# UAE Neem Extract as a Corrosion Inhibitor for Carbon Steel in HCl Solution

Authors: Ayssar Nahlé; Ideisan Abu-Abdoun; Ibrahim Abdel-Rahman; Maysoon Al-Khayat
Journal: International Journal of Corrosion
 (2010)

---

## Abstract

The effect of aqueous extract of UAE Neem (Azadirachta Indica) on the corrosion inhibition of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl solution was investigated electrochemically, and by weight-loss experiments at temperatures ranging from 303 to 343 K. The percentage inhibition increased with the increase of the concentration of the inhibitor. At a concentration of 2.0 g/L, the percentage inhibition reached about 87% at room temperature and 80% at 303 K. The percentage inhibition decreased with the increase of temperature. The thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption of this inhibitor on the metal surface were calculated using the Temkin adsorption isotherm. The aqueous Neem leaves extract was found to be an excellent potential corrosion inhibitor because of the high content of tannin content as well as the presence of a series of complex triterpene glycosides.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The corrosion of metals in many industries,  constructions, installations, and civil services such as electricity, water, and sewage supplies is a serious problem. In order to prevent or minimize corrosion, inhibitors are usually used especially in flow cooling systems. Organic, inorganic, or a mixture of both inhibitors can inhibit corrosion by either chemisorption on the metal surface or reacting with metal ions and forming a barrier-type precipitate on its surface [1].Because of the toxic nature and/or high cost of some chemicals currently in use as inhibitors, it is necessary to develop environmentally acceptable and inexpensive ones. Natural products can be considered as a good source for this purpose. The aqueous extracts from different parts of some plants such as Henna,Lawsonia inermis [1], Rosmarinous officinalis L. [2], Carica papaya[3], cordia latifolia and curcumin [4], date palm, phoenix dactylifera,henna, lawsonia inermis,corn,Zea mays[5], and Nypa Fruticans Wurmb[6] have been found to be good corrosion inhibitors for many metals and alloys. Recently, an excellent review about “natural products as corrosion inhibitors for metals in corrosive media” has been published [7].No studies have been reported on the aqueous extract of Neem leaves planted in UAE,Azadirachta indica,as corrosion inhibitor used in our present work, in terms of studying both the electrochemical effect and the temperature effect on the corrosion inhibition of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl solution. Carbon steel was chosen in our studies since high temperature aggressive acids are widely used in industries in connection to carbon and low alloy steels.The aim of this work is to study, using potentiodynamic and weight-loss measurements, the effect of temperature on the corrosion inhibition of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl solution by the aqueous extract of Neem leaves, and to calculate the thermodynamic parameters. The output of this study is intended to be a cheap and an eco-friendly natural source that can be utilized as a corrosion inhibitor for metals and alloys.


## 2. Experimental

The leaves were collected from 10 years old Neem trees planted on the University of Sharjah premises (Sharjah, United Arab Emirates), dried at room temperature, and stored in dark for later use.Several extraction procedures were tested. These extraction procedures included extraction by distilled water at80°C, extraction by distilled water at room temperature, and extraction by boiling ethanol (78°C). Preliminary corrosion studies by weight-loss measurements were carried out in order to find the optimal extraction procedure. These preliminary corrosion measurements showed that the aqueous extraction at room temperature was the same or far more efficient than the two other procedures. This extraction procedure was adopted in our current work.In order to optimize the time of extraction of the Neem, 2.0 g of the dry Neem leaves were soaked in 60 mL distilled water at room temperature (20°C) for various time ranging from 0.17 hours to 168 hours, followed by filtration, then added to an aqueous HCl solution to make a 1.0 L solution in 1.0 M HCl. Weight-loss measurements described in (Section 2.2.3) were carried out on steel specimens prepared as shown in (Section 2.2.1) in each extract solution. The percent inhibition was finally calculated according to (2). It was found that 7 hours was the optimal soaking time as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1.Table 1
The effect of soaking time of Neem leaves in distilled water on the percentage inhibition.
Time of soaking neem leaves in water (hours)Inhibition at 303 K(%)0.17500.33550.5601703777801480248016880Figure 1
The effect of soaking time of Neem leaves in distilled water on the percentage inhibition.In this work, 2.0 g of dry Neem leaves were soaked in 60.0 mL distilled water at room temperature (20°C) for 7 hours (the optimal time), and then filtered. The filtrate was added to an aqueous HCl solution to make a 1.0 L stock solution in 1.0 M HCl. From the stock solution, a series of diluted solutions in 1.0 M HCl were prepared with concentrations ranging from 2.0 g/L to 0.02 g/L.


### 2.1. Electrochemistry

#### 2.1.1. Electrode Preparation

5 mm diameter working electrode was prepared from a 5 mm diameter carbon steel rod (IS 226 containing 0.18% C, 0.6% Mn, and 0.35% Si) supplied by “Reliable Steel Traders”, Sharjah, UAE; and mounted, using Araldite epoxy resin, in a glass tube that fits in the electrochemical cell. The working carbon steel electrode was abraded using a series of carborundum papers starting with 600 grades and ending with 1200 grades prior to each experiment. The electrode surface was then polished with 0.3μm alumina on cloth, washed with deionized distilled water, and rinsed with pure ethanol before it was transferred to the electrochemical cell that contained deaerated fresh electrolyte.


#### 2.1.2. Instrumentation

The same electrochemical glass cell (made in Southampton University, England) used in our previous works [8–13] and described in Figure 2 was here employed. The electrochemical cell consisted of a carbon steel working electrode (WE), a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as a reference electrode (RE), and platinum gauze counter electrode (CE). Prior to each experiment, the electrolyte was deaerated by nitrogen bubbling. The cell design allowed nitrogen to escape into the solution, precluding its collection at the electrode surface that is fitted horizontally.Figure 2
The electrochemical cell. (1) gas bubbler, (2) B 12 glass socket, (3) Platinum gauze (counter electrode), (4) glass frit, (5) inlet for nitrogen gas, (6) luggin capillary (reference electrode), (7) steel rod (working electrode), (8) epoxy resin, (9) B 24 glass socket, (10) copper wire.The counter-electrode compartment was separated from the working-electrode compartment with a glass frit. This way, the working electrode was protected from any substance that may be produced at the counter electrode during the electrochemical reactions. The electrochemical equipment and chemicals used were as follows.A PC-controlled Sycopel AEW2-1000 electrochemical workstation (supplied from Sycopel Scientific Limited, England) capable of driving currents up to ±1 A with an output potential across the cell of up to ±10 V.Analytical-grade hydrochloric acid (Ajax) was used.


#### 2.1.3. Measuring Procedure

Electrochemical corrosion measurements (Tafel plots) were carried out on the carbon steel electrode, prepared as described above, in 1.0 M HCl and in 1.0 M HCl containing various concentrations of the aqueous Neem extract. The concentration of the Neem extract ranged from 2.0 g/L to 0.2 g/L.60 milliliters of the freshly prepared electrolyte was filled in the electrochemical cell. The solution was then deaerated with nitrogen gas; and the working electrode equilibrium potential versus SCE was recorded until it reached a steady state. Finally, the electrode potential was scanned from −700 mV to −100 mV versus SCE at a sweep rate of 1 mV·s-1. The data were collected and plotted as logarithm of the absolute value of the current (log|I|, mA) versus the electrode potential (E, mV) versus SCE. With extreme experimental precautions taken, and with a newly polished electrode and fresh electrolyte, the experiment was repeated for at least three times in order to ensure the reproducibility of the results. Once reproducible plots were obtained, the corrosion currents were then extrapolated from the log|I| (logarithm of current, mA) versus electrode potential plots (Tafel plots).


### 2.2. Effect of Temperature

#### 2.2.1. Specimen Preparation

Rectangular specimens (1cm×2.3cm×0.3cm) were cut from a 3 mm thick carbon steel sheet (IS 226 containing 0.18% C, 0.6% Mn, and 0.35% Si) supplied by “Reliable Steel Traders”, Sharjah, UAE; and used in the weight loss measurements. Close to the upper edge of the specimen, a 2 mm diameter hole was drilled and served to be hooked with a glass rod for immersion purposes. The specimens were polished with 600 grade emery paper, rinsed with distilled water, degreased with acetone, dried, and finally weighed precisely on an accurate analytical balance prior to each experiment.


#### 2.2.2. Instrumentation

For the weight-loss measurements [14, 15], a 250 mL round bottom flask fitted with a reflux condenser and long glass rod which served to hook and immerse the specimen and in turn immersed in a thermally controlled water bath was used.


#### 2.2.3. Measuring Procedure

100 mL of 1.0 M HCl solution either with or without the presence of various concentrations of aqueous Neem extract were transferred in the flask. The flask was then placed in water bath. When the required temperature was reached, the precisely weighed carbon steel specimen hooked with a glass rod was immersed in the solution for exactly six hours. After that time, the sample was removed, rinsed with distilled deionized water, degreased with acetone, dried, and finally weighed precisely on an accurate analytical balance. This procedure was repeated for a variety of inhibitor concentrations ranging from 0.02 g/L to 2.00 g/L; and at temperatures ranging from 303 K to 343 K.


## 2.1. Electrochemistry

### 2.1.1. Electrode Preparation

5 mm diameter working electrode was prepared from a 5 mm diameter carbon steel rod (IS 226 containing 0.18% C, 0.6% Mn, and 0.35% Si) supplied by “Reliable Steel Traders”, Sharjah, UAE; and mounted, using Araldite epoxy resin, in a glass tube that fits in the electrochemical cell. The working carbon steel electrode was abraded using a series of carborundum papers starting with 600 grades and ending with 1200 grades prior to each experiment. The electrode surface was then polished with 0.3μm alumina on cloth, washed with deionized distilled water, and rinsed with pure ethanol before it was transferred to the electrochemical cell that contained deaerated fresh electrolyte.


### 2.1.2. Instrumentation

The same electrochemical glass cell (made in Southampton University, England) used in our previous works [8–13] and described in Figure 2 was here employed. The electrochemical cell consisted of a carbon steel working electrode (WE), a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as a reference electrode (RE), and platinum gauze counter electrode (CE). Prior to each experiment, the electrolyte was deaerated by nitrogen bubbling. The cell design allowed nitrogen to escape into the solution, precluding its collection at the electrode surface that is fitted horizontally.Figure 2
The electrochemical cell. (1) gas bubbler, (2) B 12 glass socket, (3) Platinum gauze (counter electrode), (4) glass frit, (5) inlet for nitrogen gas, (6) luggin capillary (reference electrode), (7) steel rod (working electrode), (8) epoxy resin, (9) B 24 glass socket, (10) copper wire.The counter-electrode compartment was separated from the working-electrode compartment with a glass frit. This way, the working electrode was protected from any substance that may be produced at the counter electrode during the electrochemical reactions. The electrochemical equipment and chemicals used were as follows.A PC-controlled Sycopel AEW2-1000 electrochemical workstation (supplied from Sycopel Scientific Limited, England) capable of driving currents up to ±1 A with an output potential across the cell of up to ±10 V.Analytical-grade hydrochloric acid (Ajax) was used.


### 2.1.3. Measuring Procedure

Electrochemical corrosion measurements (Tafel plots) were carried out on the carbon steel electrode, prepared as described above, in 1.0 M HCl and in 1.0 M HCl containing various concentrations of the aqueous Neem extract. The concentration of the Neem extract ranged from 2.0 g/L to 0.2 g/L.60 milliliters of the freshly prepared electrolyte was filled in the electrochemical cell. The solution was then deaerated with nitrogen gas; and the working electrode equilibrium potential versus SCE was recorded until it reached a steady state. Finally, the electrode potential was scanned from −700 mV to −100 mV versus SCE at a sweep rate of 1 mV·s-1. The data were collected and plotted as logarithm of the absolute value of the current (log|I|, mA) versus the electrode potential (E, mV) versus SCE. With extreme experimental precautions taken, and with a newly polished electrode and fresh electrolyte, the experiment was repeated for at least three times in order to ensure the reproducibility of the results. Once reproducible plots were obtained, the corrosion currents were then extrapolated from the log|I| (logarithm of current, mA) versus electrode potential plots (Tafel plots).


## 2.1.1. Electrode Preparation

5 mm diameter working electrode was prepared from a 5 mm diameter carbon steel rod (IS 226 containing 0.18% C, 0.6% Mn, and 0.35% Si) supplied by “Reliable Steel Traders”, Sharjah, UAE; and mounted, using Araldite epoxy resin, in a glass tube that fits in the electrochemical cell. The working carbon steel electrode was abraded using a series of carborundum papers starting with 600 grades and ending with 1200 grades prior to each experiment. The electrode surface was then polished with 0.3μm alumina on cloth, washed with deionized distilled water, and rinsed with pure ethanol before it was transferred to the electrochemical cell that contained deaerated fresh electrolyte.


## 2.1.2. Instrumentation

The same electrochemical glass cell (made in Southampton University, England) used in our previous works [8–13] and described in Figure 2 was here employed. The electrochemical cell consisted of a carbon steel working electrode (WE), a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as a reference electrode (RE), and platinum gauze counter electrode (CE). Prior to each experiment, the electrolyte was deaerated by nitrogen bubbling. The cell design allowed nitrogen to escape into the solution, precluding its collection at the electrode surface that is fitted horizontally.Figure 2
The electrochemical cell. (1) gas bubbler, (2) B 12 glass socket, (3) Platinum gauze (counter electrode), (4) glass frit, (5) inlet for nitrogen gas, (6) luggin capillary (reference electrode), (7) steel rod (working electrode), (8) epoxy resin, (9) B 24 glass socket, (10) copper wire.The counter-electrode compartment was separated from the working-electrode compartment with a glass frit. This way, the working electrode was protected from any substance that may be produced at the counter electrode during the electrochemical reactions. The electrochemical equipment and chemicals used were as follows.A PC-controlled Sycopel AEW2-1000 electrochemical workstation (supplied from Sycopel Scientific Limited, England) capable of driving currents up to ±1 A with an output potential across the cell of up to ±10 V.Analytical-grade hydrochloric acid (Ajax) was used.


## 2.1.3. Measuring Procedure

Electrochemical corrosion measurements (Tafel plots) were carried out on the carbon steel electrode, prepared as described above, in 1.0 M HCl and in 1.0 M HCl containing various concentrations of the aqueous Neem extract. The concentration of the Neem extract ranged from 2.0 g/L to 0.2 g/L.60 milliliters of the freshly prepared electrolyte was filled in the electrochemical cell. The solution was then deaerated with nitrogen gas; and the working electrode equilibrium potential versus SCE was recorded until it reached a steady state. Finally, the electrode potential was scanned from −700 mV to −100 mV versus SCE at a sweep rate of 1 mV·s-1. The data were collected and plotted as logarithm of the absolute value of the current (log|I|, mA) versus the electrode potential (E, mV) versus SCE. With extreme experimental precautions taken, and with a newly polished electrode and fresh electrolyte, the experiment was repeated for at least three times in order to ensure the reproducibility of the results. Once reproducible plots were obtained, the corrosion currents were then extrapolated from the log|I| (logarithm of current, mA) versus electrode potential plots (Tafel plots).


## 2.2. Effect of Temperature

### 2.2.1. Specimen Preparation

Rectangular specimens (1cm×2.3cm×0.3cm) were cut from a 3 mm thick carbon steel sheet (IS 226 containing 0.18% C, 0.6% Mn, and 0.35% Si) supplied by “Reliable Steel Traders”, Sharjah, UAE; and used in the weight loss measurements. Close to the upper edge of the specimen, a 2 mm diameter hole was drilled and served to be hooked with a glass rod for immersion purposes. The specimens were polished with 600 grade emery paper, rinsed with distilled water, degreased with acetone, dried, and finally weighed precisely on an accurate analytical balance prior to each experiment.


### 2.2.2. Instrumentation

For the weight-loss measurements [14, 15], a 250 mL round bottom flask fitted with a reflux condenser and long glass rod which served to hook and immerse the specimen and in turn immersed in a thermally controlled water bath was used.


### 2.2.3. Measuring Procedure

100 mL of 1.0 M HCl solution either with or without the presence of various concentrations of aqueous Neem extract were transferred in the flask. The flask was then placed in water bath. When the required temperature was reached, the precisely weighed carbon steel specimen hooked with a glass rod was immersed in the solution for exactly six hours. After that time, the sample was removed, rinsed with distilled deionized water, degreased with acetone, dried, and finally weighed precisely on an accurate analytical balance. This procedure was repeated for a variety of inhibitor concentrations ranging from 0.02 g/L to 2.00 g/L; and at temperatures ranging from 303 K to 343 K.


## 2.2.1. Specimen Preparation

Rectangular specimens (1cm×2.3cm×0.3cm) were cut from a 3 mm thick carbon steel sheet (IS 226 containing 0.18% C, 0.6% Mn, and 0.35% Si) supplied by “Reliable Steel Traders”, Sharjah, UAE; and used in the weight loss measurements. Close to the upper edge of the specimen, a 2 mm diameter hole was drilled and served to be hooked with a glass rod for immersion purposes. The specimens were polished with 600 grade emery paper, rinsed with distilled water, degreased with acetone, dried, and finally weighed precisely on an accurate analytical balance prior to each experiment.


## 2.2.2. Instrumentation

For the weight-loss measurements [14, 15], a 250 mL round bottom flask fitted with a reflux condenser and long glass rod which served to hook and immerse the specimen and in turn immersed in a thermally controlled water bath was used.


## 2.2.3. Measuring Procedure

100 mL of 1.0 M HCl solution either with or without the presence of various concentrations of aqueous Neem extract were transferred in the flask. The flask was then placed in water bath. When the required temperature was reached, the precisely weighed carbon steel specimen hooked with a glass rod was immersed in the solution for exactly six hours. After that time, the sample was removed, rinsed with distilled deionized water, degreased with acetone, dried, and finally weighed precisely on an accurate analytical balance. This procedure was repeated for a variety of inhibitor concentrations ranging from 0.02 g/L to 2.00 g/L; and at temperatures ranging from 303 K to 343 K.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Electrochemistry

The anodic and cathodic polarization curves (Tafel plot) of the carbon steel electrode in deaerated 1.0 M HCl solution with and without the addition of various concentrations of the aqueous Neem extract are shown in Figure3. The aqueous Neem extract acted as a mixed inhibitor because its presence at all concentrations affected both, the anodic and the cathodic branches of the polarization curves. Furthermore, the polarization curves corresponding to all concentrations of the aqueous Neem extract were all almost at equal distance from that recorded with uninhibited 1.0 M HCl. The corrosion current of carbon steel electrode in each solution was determined by locating the intersections of extrapolated tangents of the anodic and cathodic curves of the Tafel plot at the corrosion potential (Erest). Values of associated electrochemical parameters and corresponding percent inhibition are given in Table 2. The corrosion current was found to decrease with the increase of the concentration of the inhibitor as shown in Table 2. In the absence of inhibitor (1.0 M HCl), the corrosion current was 0.76 mA; and dropped to 0.101 mA when the concentration of aqueous Neem leaves extract reached 2.0 g/L in 1.0 M HCl (Table 2).Table 2
Tafel corrosion currents and percentage inhibitions of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves at various concentrations in 1.0 M HCl at room temperature.
1.0 M HCl1.0 M HCl + 0.20 g/LExtract of Neem1.0 M HCl + 0.50 g/LExtract of Neem1.0 M HCl + 1.00 g/LExtract of Neem1.0 M HCl + 2.00 g/LExtract of NeemErest/V versus SCE−0.465−0.438−0.433−0.472−0.583ba/(mV/dec.)57.561.194.5112.0143.9ba/(mV/dec.)63.856.187.777.276.1I“corrosion”/mA0.760.2370.1690.1510.101PercentInhibition—68.8277.7680.1386.84Figure 3
Anodic and cathodic polarization curves of carbon steel in an uninhibited 1.0 M HCl solution and in 1.0 M HCl containing various concentrations of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves.(1) 1.0 M HCl; (2) 1.0 M HCl + 0.20 g/L extract; (3) 1.0 M HCl + 0.50 g/L extract; (4) 1.0 M HCl + 1.00 g/L extract; (5) 1.0 M HCl + 2.00 g/L extract.The values of percentage inhibition of aqueous Neem extract at various concentrations in 1.0 M HCl were calculated according to (1), and are shown in Table 2:
(1)Percentage Inhibition=(ICorr.)Uninh.-(ICorr.)Inh.(ICorr.)Uninh.×100,
where (ICorr.)Uninh.= Corrosion current in the uninhibited solution, and (ICorr.)Inh. = Corrosion current in inhibited solution.The plot of the percentage inhibition versus the concentration of the aqueous Neem extract in 1.0 M HCl is shown in Figure4. This figure shows that the percentage inhibition has steeply increased from about 69% with 0.20 g/L inhibitor to about 87% with 2.0 g/L inhibitor.Figure 4
Percentage inhibition of different concentrations of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on carbon steel surface in 1.0 M HCl solution at room temperature based on anodic and cathodic polarization curves.There are many factors affecting the corrosion inhibition efficiency by organic compounds such as the number and types of adsorbing groups as well as their molecular size, molecular structure, and mode of interaction with the corroding metal surface. These molecules have the ability to inhibit corrosion either by chemisorption or physisorption on the metal surface. The molecules that physisorbed reduce corrosion by shifting the cathodic reaction at the sides where they attached, while the chemisorbed ones that attached at the anodic areas retard the reactivity of these areas towards corrosion. Neem is bitter in taste due to the high content of tannins and a series of complex compounds called “triterpenes” or more specifically “limonoids”. One of the most important triterpenes is azadirachtin. Nearly 100 protolimonoids, limonoids or tetranortriterpenoids, pentanortriterpenoids, exanortriterpenoids, and some ponterpenoid constituents have been isolated from various parts of the Neem tree; still more are being isolated. As tannins contain polyphenolic moieties and these moieties have the ability to form tanninate salts with ferric ions, the corrosion inhibition of tannins is due to the formation of a highly cross-lined network of ferric tanninate salts that protect the metal surface. In the same way, triterpenes have some functional groups such as (OH, C = O, C = C) that can interact with the metal surface and protect it from the attack of hydronium (H3O+) ions.When the electrode was pulled out from the 1.0 M HCl containing an aqueous extract of 2.0 g/L of Neem leaves (at the end of the experiment), the carbon steel surface was more clean (about 87% inhibition) compared with the experiment with concentration of 0.20 g/L in 1.0 M HCl (about 69% inhibition).The high inhibition efficiency may be attributed to the presence of tannins, triterpenes, and many other organic compounds that have been extracted by only soaking the dry Neem leaves in distilled water.


### 3.2. Effect of Temperature

Weight-loss corrosion tests were carried out on the carbon steel immersed in 1.0 M HCl in the absence or presence of aqueous Neem extract over a period of 6 hours. Table3 represents the corrosion rate [mg·cm-2·h-1] and the percentage efficiency for Neem inhibitor with concentrations varying from 0.02 g/L to 2.00 g/L at 303, 313, 323, 333, and 343 K, respectively. The percentage efficiency was calculated according to (2):
(2)%Inhibition=WUninh.-WInh.WUninh.×100,
where WUninh.= corrosion rate without inhibitor; and WInh.=corrosion rate with inhibitor.Table 3
The Effect of concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on the corrosion rate (mg·cm−2·h−1) and percentage efficiency of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at various temperatures.
Temperaure e/K343333323313303Concentration of Inhibitor% EfficienyCorr. Rate% EfficienyCorr. Rate% EfficienyCorr. Rate% EfficienyCorr. RateCorr. Rate% Efficieny1.0 M HCl0.961—1.394—4.671—12.225—26.280—1.0 M HCl + 0.02 g/L0.548430.920343.6432211.247832.324−231.0 M HCl + 0.20 g/L0.336650.600572.9893611.0031031.010−181.0 M HCl + 0.50 g/L0.250740.544612.382499.1692527.594−51.0 M HCl + 1.00 g/L0.221770.516632.055567.9643525.22941.0 M HCl + 2.00 g/L0.192800.446681.822617.3354024.1788The corrosion rate of the carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl as a function of various concentrations of aqueous extract of Neem leaves at temperatures between 303 and 343 K were shown in Figures5 and 6. It was obviously noticed that the corrosion rate dropped rapidly at lower concentrations of the extract Neem than at higher ones at 303 K and 313 K, while the situation was the opposite at 323 K and 333 K. At 343 K, there was no inhibition at all at low concentrations and instead, acceleration in the rate of corrosion was noticed. This could be due to the presence of the ions in the Neem leaves extract (extracted with water), and because at this elevated temperature the adsorption of the inhibitor (at low concentration) was low, the dissolved ions had high influence on the increase of the corrosion rate in addition to the HCl solution. When the concentration of the extract increased, more inhibitor seemed to get adsorbed on the metal surface, which in turn caused less effect of dissolved ions on the corrosion rate.Figure 5
Effect of concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on the corrosion rate (mg·cm-2·h-1) of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at various temperatures.Figure 6
Effect of concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on the corrosion rate (mg·cm-2·h-1) of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at various temperatures.The relative decrease in the corrosion rate was more significant at lower temperatures than at higher ones as shown in Figures5 and 6. This means that the rate of corrosion decreased more significantly at lower temperatures.The plots of the percentage inhibition as a function of the concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves at temperatures ranging from 303 K to 343 K were shown in Figure7. Similar to the rate of corrosion in Figures 5 and 6, the inhibition was so obvious and more effective at low temperatures than at higher ones, and even a catalysis effect (negative inhibition values) was noticed at 343 K and concentrations of equal or less than 0.50 g/L.Figure 7
Effect of concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on the percent inhibition of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at various temperatures.According to Arrhenius Equation (3), the values of natural logarithms of the rate of corrosion (ln Rate of corrosion) and the values of the reciprocal of the temperature in K-1 (1/T) were tabulated in Table 4:
(3)lnrate=-EaRT+constant,
where Ea = activation energy [kcal·mol-1], R = gas constant [kcal·mol-1], T = absolute temperature [K], and const. = constantTable 4
The data obtained from the weight loss measurements for Arrhenius Equation: (I/T) against Ln (Corrosion Rate).
Ln (Corrosion Rate)/mg·cm−2·h−1(1/T) ×103/K−11.0 M HCl1.0 M HCl+ 0.02 g/L1.0M HCl+ 0.20 g/L1.0 M HCl+ 0.50 g/L1.0 M HCl+ 1.00 g/L1.0 M HCl+ 2.00 g/L3.30−0.03978−0.60148−1.09064−1.38629−1.50959−1.650263.190.33218−0.08338−0.51083−0.59059−0.66165−0.807443.101.541371.292811.094940.867940.720280.599933.002.503482.42012.398172.215832.074931.992662.923.268813.475813.434313.31763.227993.18544The Arrhenius plots of the corrosion of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl solution, (ln corrosion rate as a function of 1/T) with or without the presence of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves at concentrations ranging from 0.02 g/L to 2.0 g/L are plotted in Figure 8. From this figure, the slope (-Ea/R) of each line was determined and used to calculate the activation energy according to (3), with R=1.987×10-3 kcal·mol-1. It is clearly noticed that as the concentration of the extract increases, the activation energy for the corrosion of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl is also increase (18.27 kcal·mol-1in 1.0 M HCl without inhibitor to 25.96 kcal·mol-1with an aqueous extract of  Neem leaves of 2.0 g/L in 1.0 M HCl), (Table 5).Table 5
The activation energy (Ea) for the corrosion of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl with and without the aqueous extract of Neem leaves at various concentrations.
SystemActivation Energy,Ea (kcal·mol-1)2.00 g/L1.00 g/L0.50 g/L0.20 g/L0.02 g/L1.0 M HCl18.2718.2718.2718.2718.271.0 M HCl + The Aqueous Extract of Neem Leaves25.9625.4225.4324.8822.15Figure 8
The Arrhenius plots of the corrosion rate of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl solution with and without the presence of various concentrations of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves.The values of the surface coverage of various concentrations of the aqueous Neem leaves extract (from 0.02 g/L to 2.0 g/L) on carbon steel surface at various temperatures are tabulated in Table6. These values were extracted from the corresponding percentage efficiency values reported earlier in Table 3. The plot of the values of surface coverage, θ, against the natural logarithm of the concentration of Neem leaves aqueous extract; lnC, for carbon steel at various inhibitor temperatures is shown in Figure 9. After examining these data and adjusting them to different theoretical adsorption isotherms, it was concluded that the inhibitor was adsorbed on the carbon steel surface according to Temkin Adsorption Isotherm:
(4)-2aθ=lnKC,
where a = molecular interaction constant, θ = degree of coverage, K = equilibrium constant for the adsorption reaction, and C = concentration of the inhibitor.Table 6
The Effect of concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on surface coverage for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at various temperatures.
Temperature/K303313323333343Concentration of InhibitorSurface CoverageθSurface CoverageθSurface CoverageθSurface CoverageθSurface Coverageθ1.0 M HCl + 0.02 g/L0.430.340.220.08−0.231.0 M HCl + 0.20 g/L0.650.570.360.10−0.181.0 M HCl + 0.50 g/L0.740.610.490.25−0.051.0 M HCl + 1.00 g/L0.770.630.560.350.041.0 M HCl + 2.00 g/L0.800.680.610.400.08Figure 9
Effect of concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on the surface coverage of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at various temperatures.The equilibrium constant for the adsorption reaction,K, is related to the standard free energy of adsorption via (5) [16]:
(5)K=155.5exp(-ΔGRT),
Where: K = equilibrium constant for the adsorption reaction, 55.5 = concentration of water [mol·L-1], ΔG = standard free energy [kcal·mol-1], R = gas constant [kcal·mol-1], and T = absolute temperature [K].According to (4), the straight lines shown in Figure 9 will have the following slopes and intercepts:
(6)Slope=-12a,(7)Intercept=-12alnK.Combination of (6) and (7) leads to the following relationships:
(8)Intercept=(Slope)(lnK),(9)K=e(Intercept/Slope).Using (9), the equilibrium constant for the adsorption reaction, K, was calculated.The free energy of adsorption of the inhibitor,ΔG, was calculated using (5) at various temperatures (303 K to 343 K) as shown in Table 7.Table 7
The Free energy of adsorption(ΔGads) for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl in the presence of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves at various temperatures (303 K−343 K).
ΔG, kcal·mol-1303 K313 K323 K333 K343 K−8.01−8.04−6.58−5.52−2.84The enthalpy of adsorption,ΔH, for the inhibitor was calculated from the following and is shown in Table 8:
(10)ΔH=Ea-RT.
The entropy, ΔS, was calculated at various temperatures for the inhibitor using the following and is shown in Table 9:
(11)ΔG=ΔH-TΔS.Table 8
The enthalpy of adsorption (ΔH) for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl in the presence of the aqueous extract of (2.0 g/L) Neem leaves at various temperatures (303 K−343 K).
ΔH, kcal·mol-1303 K313 K323 K333 K343 K25.3625.3425.3225.3025.28Table 9
The change in entropy (ΔS) for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl in the presence of the aqueous extract of (2.0 g/L) Neem leaves at various temperatures (303 K−343 K).
ΔS, kcal·K-1·mol-1303 K313 K323 K333 K343 K0.1100.1070.09880.09260.0820The activation energy (Ea) for the corrosion of carbon steel in the presence of the aqueous extract of neem leaves at all concentrations (0.02 g/L to 2.0 g/L) are higher compared to the activation energy in the absence of the extract (25.96 kcal·mol-1 with the extract of 2.0 g/L in 1.0 M HCl compared with 18.27 kcal·mol-1 in 1.0 M HCl without extract). This can be attributed to the fact that higher values of Ea in the presence of inhibitor compared to its absence are generally consistent with a physisorption, while unchanged or lower values of Ea in inhibited solution suggest charge sharing or transfer from the organic inhibitor to the metal surface to form coordinate covalent bonds (chemisorption).The increase in the activation energies for the corrosion is attributed to a decrease in the adsorption of the inhibitor on the metal surface as the temperature increased, and subsequently, an increase in the corrosion rate will result due to the greater exposed area of the metal surface to the acid. At temperatures as high as 343 K and concentrations of extract equal or lower than 0.50 g/L an acceleration of corrosion of carbon steel was occurred.The thermodynamic data obtained in the presence of the Neem extract at various temperatures were tabulated in Tables 7 to 9. These thermodynamic quantities represent the algebraic sum of the values for adsorption and desorption. The negative value of ΔG indicates the spontaneous adsorption of inhibitor on the surface of the carbon steel. The free energy, ΔG, increases from about −8 kcal·mol−1 at 303 K to about −3 kcal·mol−1 at 343 K. The adsorption process is believed to be exothermic and associated with a decrease in entropy (ΔS) of solute, while the opposite is true for the solvent [17]. The gain in entropy which accompanies the substitutional adsorption process is attributed to the increase in the solvent entropy (Table 9). This agrees with the general suggestion that the absolute values of free energy, |ΔG|, increase with the increase of inhibition efficiency [18–20] as the adsorption of organic compound is accompanied by desorption of water molecules off the surface.The high inhibition efficiency may be attributed to the presence of tannins, triterpenes, and many other organic compounds that have been extracted by only soaking the dry Neem leaves in distilled water. This inhibition may be also due to synergistic interactions between the adsorbed compounds.These results agree with Fouda et al. [21, 22] who suggested that the inhibition efficiency of organic compounds depends on many factors including their charge density, number of adsorption sites, heat of hydrogenation, mode of interaction with the metal surface, and formation of metallic complexes.


## 3.1. Electrochemistry

The anodic and cathodic polarization curves (Tafel plot) of the carbon steel electrode in deaerated 1.0 M HCl solution with and without the addition of various concentrations of the aqueous Neem extract are shown in Figure3. The aqueous Neem extract acted as a mixed inhibitor because its presence at all concentrations affected both, the anodic and the cathodic branches of the polarization curves. Furthermore, the polarization curves corresponding to all concentrations of the aqueous Neem extract were all almost at equal distance from that recorded with uninhibited 1.0 M HCl. The corrosion current of carbon steel electrode in each solution was determined by locating the intersections of extrapolated tangents of the anodic and cathodic curves of the Tafel plot at the corrosion potential (Erest). Values of associated electrochemical parameters and corresponding percent inhibition are given in Table 2. The corrosion current was found to decrease with the increase of the concentration of the inhibitor as shown in Table 2. In the absence of inhibitor (1.0 M HCl), the corrosion current was 0.76 mA; and dropped to 0.101 mA when the concentration of aqueous Neem leaves extract reached 2.0 g/L in 1.0 M HCl (Table 2).Table 2
Tafel corrosion currents and percentage inhibitions of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves at various concentrations in 1.0 M HCl at room temperature.
1.0 M HCl1.0 M HCl + 0.20 g/LExtract of Neem1.0 M HCl + 0.50 g/LExtract of Neem1.0 M HCl + 1.00 g/LExtract of Neem1.0 M HCl + 2.00 g/LExtract of NeemErest/V versus SCE−0.465−0.438−0.433−0.472−0.583ba/(mV/dec.)57.561.194.5112.0143.9ba/(mV/dec.)63.856.187.777.276.1I“corrosion”/mA0.760.2370.1690.1510.101PercentInhibition—68.8277.7680.1386.84Figure 3
Anodic and cathodic polarization curves of carbon steel in an uninhibited 1.0 M HCl solution and in 1.0 M HCl containing various concentrations of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves.(1) 1.0 M HCl; (2) 1.0 M HCl + 0.20 g/L extract; (3) 1.0 M HCl + 0.50 g/L extract; (4) 1.0 M HCl + 1.00 g/L extract; (5) 1.0 M HCl + 2.00 g/L extract.The values of percentage inhibition of aqueous Neem extract at various concentrations in 1.0 M HCl were calculated according to (1), and are shown in Table 2:
(1)Percentage Inhibition=(ICorr.)Uninh.-(ICorr.)Inh.(ICorr.)Uninh.×100,
where (ICorr.)Uninh.= Corrosion current in the uninhibited solution, and (ICorr.)Inh. = Corrosion current in inhibited solution.The plot of the percentage inhibition versus the concentration of the aqueous Neem extract in 1.0 M HCl is shown in Figure4. This figure shows that the percentage inhibition has steeply increased from about 69% with 0.20 g/L inhibitor to about 87% with 2.0 g/L inhibitor.Figure 4
Percentage inhibition of different concentrations of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on carbon steel surface in 1.0 M HCl solution at room temperature based on anodic and cathodic polarization curves.There are many factors affecting the corrosion inhibition efficiency by organic compounds such as the number and types of adsorbing groups as well as their molecular size, molecular structure, and mode of interaction with the corroding metal surface. These molecules have the ability to inhibit corrosion either by chemisorption or physisorption on the metal surface. The molecules that physisorbed reduce corrosion by shifting the cathodic reaction at the sides where they attached, while the chemisorbed ones that attached at the anodic areas retard the reactivity of these areas towards corrosion. Neem is bitter in taste due to the high content of tannins and a series of complex compounds called “triterpenes” or more specifically “limonoids”. One of the most important triterpenes is azadirachtin. Nearly 100 protolimonoids, limonoids or tetranortriterpenoids, pentanortriterpenoids, exanortriterpenoids, and some ponterpenoid constituents have been isolated from various parts of the Neem tree; still more are being isolated. As tannins contain polyphenolic moieties and these moieties have the ability to form tanninate salts with ferric ions, the corrosion inhibition of tannins is due to the formation of a highly cross-lined network of ferric tanninate salts that protect the metal surface. In the same way, triterpenes have some functional groups such as (OH, C = O, C = C) that can interact with the metal surface and protect it from the attack of hydronium (H3O+) ions.When the electrode was pulled out from the 1.0 M HCl containing an aqueous extract of 2.0 g/L of Neem leaves (at the end of the experiment), the carbon steel surface was more clean (about 87% inhibition) compared with the experiment with concentration of 0.20 g/L in 1.0 M HCl (about 69% inhibition).The high inhibition efficiency may be attributed to the presence of tannins, triterpenes, and many other organic compounds that have been extracted by only soaking the dry Neem leaves in distilled water.


## 3.2. Effect of Temperature

Weight-loss corrosion tests were carried out on the carbon steel immersed in 1.0 M HCl in the absence or presence of aqueous Neem extract over a period of 6 hours. Table3 represents the corrosion rate [mg·cm-2·h-1] and the percentage efficiency for Neem inhibitor with concentrations varying from 0.02 g/L to 2.00 g/L at 303, 313, 323, 333, and 343 K, respectively. The percentage efficiency was calculated according to (2):
(2)%Inhibition=WUninh.-WInh.WUninh.×100,
where WUninh.= corrosion rate without inhibitor; and WInh.=corrosion rate with inhibitor.Table 3
The Effect of concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on the corrosion rate (mg·cm−2·h−1) and percentage efficiency of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at various temperatures.
Temperaure e/K343333323313303Concentration of Inhibitor% EfficienyCorr. Rate% EfficienyCorr. Rate% EfficienyCorr. Rate% EfficienyCorr. RateCorr. Rate% Efficieny1.0 M HCl0.961—1.394—4.671—12.225—26.280—1.0 M HCl + 0.02 g/L0.548430.920343.6432211.247832.324−231.0 M HCl + 0.20 g/L0.336650.600572.9893611.0031031.010−181.0 M HCl + 0.50 g/L0.250740.544612.382499.1692527.594−51.0 M HCl + 1.00 g/L0.221770.516632.055567.9643525.22941.0 M HCl + 2.00 g/L0.192800.446681.822617.3354024.1788The corrosion rate of the carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl as a function of various concentrations of aqueous extract of Neem leaves at temperatures between 303 and 343 K were shown in Figures5 and 6. It was obviously noticed that the corrosion rate dropped rapidly at lower concentrations of the extract Neem than at higher ones at 303 K and 313 K, while the situation was the opposite at 323 K and 333 K. At 343 K, there was no inhibition at all at low concentrations and instead, acceleration in the rate of corrosion was noticed. This could be due to the presence of the ions in the Neem leaves extract (extracted with water), and because at this elevated temperature the adsorption of the inhibitor (at low concentration) was low, the dissolved ions had high influence on the increase of the corrosion rate in addition to the HCl solution. When the concentration of the extract increased, more inhibitor seemed to get adsorbed on the metal surface, which in turn caused less effect of dissolved ions on the corrosion rate.Figure 5
Effect of concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on the corrosion rate (mg·cm-2·h-1) of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at various temperatures.Figure 6
Effect of concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on the corrosion rate (mg·cm-2·h-1) of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at various temperatures.The relative decrease in the corrosion rate was more significant at lower temperatures than at higher ones as shown in Figures5 and 6. This means that the rate of corrosion decreased more significantly at lower temperatures.The plots of the percentage inhibition as a function of the concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves at temperatures ranging from 303 K to 343 K were shown in Figure7. Similar to the rate of corrosion in Figures 5 and 6, the inhibition was so obvious and more effective at low temperatures than at higher ones, and even a catalysis effect (negative inhibition values) was noticed at 343 K and concentrations of equal or less than 0.50 g/L.Figure 7
Effect of concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on the percent inhibition of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at various temperatures.According to Arrhenius Equation (3), the values of natural logarithms of the rate of corrosion (ln Rate of corrosion) and the values of the reciprocal of the temperature in K-1 (1/T) were tabulated in Table 4:
(3)lnrate=-EaRT+constant,
where Ea = activation energy [kcal·mol-1], R = gas constant [kcal·mol-1], T = absolute temperature [K], and const. = constantTable 4
The data obtained from the weight loss measurements for Arrhenius Equation: (I/T) against Ln (Corrosion Rate).
Ln (Corrosion Rate)/mg·cm−2·h−1(1/T) ×103/K−11.0 M HCl1.0 M HCl+ 0.02 g/L1.0M HCl+ 0.20 g/L1.0 M HCl+ 0.50 g/L1.0 M HCl+ 1.00 g/L1.0 M HCl+ 2.00 g/L3.30−0.03978−0.60148−1.09064−1.38629−1.50959−1.650263.190.33218−0.08338−0.51083−0.59059−0.66165−0.807443.101.541371.292811.094940.867940.720280.599933.002.503482.42012.398172.215832.074931.992662.923.268813.475813.434313.31763.227993.18544The Arrhenius plots of the corrosion of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl solution, (ln corrosion rate as a function of 1/T) with or without the presence of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves at concentrations ranging from 0.02 g/L to 2.0 g/L are plotted in Figure 8. From this figure, the slope (-Ea/R) of each line was determined and used to calculate the activation energy according to (3), with R=1.987×10-3 kcal·mol-1. It is clearly noticed that as the concentration of the extract increases, the activation energy for the corrosion of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl is also increase (18.27 kcal·mol-1in 1.0 M HCl without inhibitor to 25.96 kcal·mol-1with an aqueous extract of  Neem leaves of 2.0 g/L in 1.0 M HCl), (Table 5).Table 5
The activation energy (Ea) for the corrosion of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl with and without the aqueous extract of Neem leaves at various concentrations.
SystemActivation Energy,Ea (kcal·mol-1)2.00 g/L1.00 g/L0.50 g/L0.20 g/L0.02 g/L1.0 M HCl18.2718.2718.2718.2718.271.0 M HCl + The Aqueous Extract of Neem Leaves25.9625.4225.4324.8822.15Figure 8
The Arrhenius plots of the corrosion rate of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl solution with and without the presence of various concentrations of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves.The values of the surface coverage of various concentrations of the aqueous Neem leaves extract (from 0.02 g/L to 2.0 g/L) on carbon steel surface at various temperatures are tabulated in Table6. These values were extracted from the corresponding percentage efficiency values reported earlier in Table 3. The plot of the values of surface coverage, θ, against the natural logarithm of the concentration of Neem leaves aqueous extract; lnC, for carbon steel at various inhibitor temperatures is shown in Figure 9. After examining these data and adjusting them to different theoretical adsorption isotherms, it was concluded that the inhibitor was adsorbed on the carbon steel surface according to Temkin Adsorption Isotherm:
(4)-2aθ=lnKC,
where a = molecular interaction constant, θ = degree of coverage, K = equilibrium constant for the adsorption reaction, and C = concentration of the inhibitor.Table 6
The Effect of concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on surface coverage for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at various temperatures.
Temperature/K303313323333343Concentration of InhibitorSurface CoverageθSurface CoverageθSurface CoverageθSurface CoverageθSurface Coverageθ1.0 M HCl + 0.02 g/L0.430.340.220.08−0.231.0 M HCl + 0.20 g/L0.650.570.360.10−0.181.0 M HCl + 0.50 g/L0.740.610.490.25−0.051.0 M HCl + 1.00 g/L0.770.630.560.350.041.0 M HCl + 2.00 g/L0.800.680.610.400.08Figure 9
Effect of concentration of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves on the surface coverage of carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at various temperatures.The equilibrium constant for the adsorption reaction,K, is related to the standard free energy of adsorption via (5) [16]:
(5)K=155.5exp(-ΔGRT),
Where: K = equilibrium constant for the adsorption reaction, 55.5 = concentration of water [mol·L-1], ΔG = standard free energy [kcal·mol-1], R = gas constant [kcal·mol-1], and T = absolute temperature [K].According to (4), the straight lines shown in Figure 9 will have the following slopes and intercepts:
(6)Slope=-12a,(7)Intercept=-12alnK.Combination of (6) and (7) leads to the following relationships:
(8)Intercept=(Slope)(lnK),(9)K=e(Intercept/Slope).Using (9), the equilibrium constant for the adsorption reaction, K, was calculated.The free energy of adsorption of the inhibitor,ΔG, was calculated using (5) at various temperatures (303 K to 343 K) as shown in Table 7.Table 7
The Free energy of adsorption(ΔGads) for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl in the presence of the aqueous extract of Neem leaves at various temperatures (303 K−343 K).
ΔG, kcal·mol-1303 K313 K323 K333 K343 K−8.01−8.04−6.58−5.52−2.84The enthalpy of adsorption,ΔH, for the inhibitor was calculated from the following and is shown in Table 8:
(10)ΔH=Ea-RT.
The entropy, ΔS, was calculated at various temperatures for the inhibitor using the following and is shown in Table 9:
(11)ΔG=ΔH-TΔS.Table 8
The enthalpy of adsorption (ΔH) for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl in the presence of the aqueous extract of (2.0 g/L) Neem leaves at various temperatures (303 K−343 K).
ΔH, kcal·mol-1303 K313 K323 K333 K343 K25.3625.3425.3225.3025.28Table 9
The change in entropy (ΔS) for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl in the presence of the aqueous extract of (2.0 g/L) Neem leaves at various temperatures (303 K−343 K).
ΔS, kcal·K-1·mol-1303 K313 K323 K333 K343 K0.1100.1070.09880.09260.0820The activation energy (Ea) for the corrosion of carbon steel in the presence of the aqueous extract of neem leaves at all concentrations (0.02 g/L to 2.0 g/L) are higher compared to the activation energy in the absence of the extract (25.96 kcal·mol-1 with the extract of 2.0 g/L in 1.0 M HCl compared with 18.27 kcal·mol-1 in 1.0 M HCl without extract). This can be attributed to the fact that higher values of Ea in the presence of inhibitor compared to its absence are generally consistent with a physisorption, while unchanged or lower values of Ea in inhibited solution suggest charge sharing or transfer from the organic inhibitor to the metal surface to form coordinate covalent bonds (chemisorption).The increase in the activation energies for the corrosion is attributed to a decrease in the adsorption of the inhibitor on the metal surface as the temperature increased, and subsequently, an increase in the corrosion rate will result due to the greater exposed area of the metal surface to the acid. At temperatures as high as 343 K and concentrations of extract equal or lower than 0.50 g/L an acceleration of corrosion of carbon steel was occurred.The thermodynamic data obtained in the presence of the Neem extract at various temperatures were tabulated in Tables 7 to 9. These thermodynamic quantities represent the algebraic sum of the values for adsorption and desorption. The negative value of ΔG indicates the spontaneous adsorption of inhibitor on the surface of the carbon steel. The free energy, ΔG, increases from about −8 kcal·mol−1 at 303 K to about −3 kcal·mol−1 at 343 K. The adsorption process is believed to be exothermic and associated with a decrease in entropy (ΔS) of solute, while the opposite is true for the solvent [17]. The gain in entropy which accompanies the substitutional adsorption process is attributed to the increase in the solvent entropy (Table 9). This agrees with the general suggestion that the absolute values of free energy, |ΔG|, increase with the increase of inhibition efficiency [18–20] as the adsorption of organic compound is accompanied by desorption of water molecules off the surface.The high inhibition efficiency may be attributed to the presence of tannins, triterpenes, and many other organic compounds that have been extracted by only soaking the dry Neem leaves in distilled water. This inhibition may be also due to synergistic interactions between the adsorbed compounds.These results agree with Fouda et al. [21, 22] who suggested that the inhibition efficiency of organic compounds depends on many factors including their charge density, number of adsorption sites, heat of hydrogenation, mode of interaction with the metal surface, and formation of metallic complexes.


## 4. Conclusions

The aqueous Neem leaves extract was found to be a highly efficient inhibitor for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl solution, reaching about 87% at 2.0 g/L and room temperature, a concentration considered to be very moderate. Even at one half of this of this concentration, 1.0 g/L, an inhibition of about 80% was obtained at room temperature.The rate of corrosion of the carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl is a function of the concentration of the neem extract. This rate decreased as the concentration of the Neem extract is increased.The percentage of inhibition in the presence of this inhibitor was decreased with temperature which indicates that physical adsorption was the predominant inhibition mechanism because the quantity of adsorbed inhibitor decreases with increasing temperature.The aqueous Neem leaves extract is an excellent, green, eco-friendly, and very cheap corrosion inhibitor for carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl solution, so it can be used to replace toxic and highly cost chemicals.



---

*Source: 460154-2010-08-30.xml*