# Antioxidant Activities of Extracts from Sarcocarp ofCotoneaster multiflorus

Authors: Xiangping Liu; Jia Jia; Xuemin Jing; Guoliang Li
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

The ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v) extract ofCotoneaster multiflorus sarcocarp was sequentially fractionated by liquid-liquid partition using n-hexane, diethyl ether, methylene dichloride, and ethyl acetate. The contents of total polyphenols, total flavones, and oligomeric proanthocyanidins in the five parts (including the ethanol-water extract) were determined. In addition, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl free radical-scavenging, 2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt radical cation decolorization, reducing power, ferric reducing antioxidant power, and lipid peroxidation inhibition assays were conducted to test the antioxidant activities of Sample 1 (the ethanol-water fraction) and Sample 2 (the ethyl acetate fraction)in vitro. In the above five assays, Sample 2 showed greater antioxidant capacities than Sample 1. Furthermore, Sample 2 was better able to protect low-density lipoproteins from oxidation in a dose-dependent manner. The test results show thatC. multiflorussarcocarp, especially the ethyl acetate-soluble fraction, may be a potential source of natural antioxidants.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Free radicals are atoms or groups with unpaired electrons, and they are generally unstable and highly reactive. The most common free radicals are oxygen-reactive species, such as singlet oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, carboxyradical, and superoxide radical, which have the greatest biological significance [1, 2]. The oxygen-reactive species generated in the human body can cause oxidative damage associated with membrane damage, aging, heart disease, and cancer [3, 4]. There is growing interest in phytochemicals, which have been hailed as “a gift from plants to humans,” as they have various health benefits and may be a new source of natural antioxidants [5, 6]. People look for natural antioxidants and use them in pharmaceutical preparations, foods, and cosmetics to replace synthetic antioxidants due to their potential health risks and toxicity [7, 8]. The application of natural antioxidants can effectively improve the stability of foods, nutrients, and drugs and at the same time enhance the body’s anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, and antitumor capacities via the polyphenolic characteristics of these antioxidants [9]. Many studies have shown that natural antioxidants in plants are usually derived from polyphenols, flavonoids, and proanthocyanidins. The antioxidant activities of the extracts are positively correlated with their contents of polyphenols, flavonoids, or proanthocyanidins [10, 11]. The plants having high phenolic compounds contents were proved to be a good source of powerful antioxidants [12]. Finding new, effective natural antioxidants is an important research topic. The isolation and purification procedures for pure compounds are often expensive and time-consuming and require considerable resources. The evaluation of the antioxidant activities of the extracts and fractions is regarded as a required step due to their potentials for high antioxidant potency [13].The genusCotoneaster plant that belongs to the Rosaceae family is broadly distributed in Asia and Europe [14–16]. There are over 50 species in this genus found in China, and many of these species are found in the Chinese provinces of Yunnan and Sichuan [14, 17]. ManyCotoneasterspecies have become popular ornamental plants due to their attractive foliage and abundant flowers and in particular for their bright red fruits [18]. Various species of the genusCotoneaster are used in the treatment of bronchitis, gastritis, vasculitis, and wound infections [15, 19]. As ornamental plants, few studies on the phytochemical properties and utilization of the genusCotoneaster have been conducted. Some flavonoid constituents fromC. wilsonii leaves were identified by Chang and Jeon [14] and Chumbalov et al. [20]; many phenolic glycosides were isolated and identified fromC. orbicularis by El-Mousallamy et al. [21]; the flavonol and isoflavones fromC. simonsii were studied and the flavonoid glycoside composition inC.thymaefolia was determined by Palme et al. [19]; the proanthocyanidins inC. oligantha were identified by Pashinina et al. [22].C. multiflorusis an ornamental plant that is widely distributed in China, Korea, and Europe; it is a fruit-bearing shrub with strong branches and deciduous leaves that is rich in nutrients and is a wild fruit tree resource that is still underexplored [23, 24]. To date, the pharmacological effects and chemical composition of various species of the genusCotoneaster have been reported, but to the best of our knowledge the chemical components and related activities ofC. multiflorus have not been reported.The aim of the study was to measure the total polyphenols, total flavonoids, and the oligomeric proanthocyanidins contents inC. multiflorussarcocarp, which directly impact its antioxidant activity, determine the optimal solvents for partitioning, and evaluate thein vitro antioxidant capacity of the sarcocarp extracts.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Plant Material

Fresh fruits were manually picked from similar 3 m, 15-year-oldC. multiflorus trees in October 2017 from the outskirts of Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China. The material was identified by Professor Huiyan Gu of the Forestry College, Northeast Forestry University, China, and voucher specimens were placed in the herbarium. To keep the material stable, 1 kg picked ripe red fruits were stored in plastic bags in a freezer at −18°C until the experiment began. The moisture content of theC. multiflorus sarcocarps was 76%  ± 4%, and this value was used in every step of the following experiments.


### 2.2. Chemicals

Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, 2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS), 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ), 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), andL-ascorbic acid (L-AA) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Rutin and grape seed extracts (90%) were obtained from Tongtian Bio-Tech Co. (Shanghai, China).


### 2.3. Extraction Process

The pulp of the fresh fruits ofC. multifloruswas separated from the seeds, and 20 g of the pulp was extracted with 200 mL of ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v) for 24 h in a 500 mL round-bottomed flask in shaking water bath at 25°C. Then, the filtered solution was concentrated using a rotatory evaporator (Shensheng Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at 55°C and −0.09 MPa until the volume of the solution remained approximately steady. The aqueous suspension was partitioned into five fractions. One fraction was directly frozen to afford a powder, and this was taken as Sample 1. The other four fractions were reextracted with the same volume of ethyl acetate, n-hexane, ether, and methylene dichloride. The organic phases were dried under reduced pressure with a rotatory evaporator. These dried powders were named Sample 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. These samples were stored in a desiccator protected from light until further use.


### 2.4. Measurement of the Total Polyphenols

The Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method was used to estimate the total phenolic content in theC. multiflorusextracts and fractions based on the procedure of Velioglu et al. [25] with a slight modification. Briefly, 1 mL of each sample was mixed with 1 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent which was diluted by a factor of two using distilled water prior to use. Subsequently, the mixtures were gently oscillated and held at room temperature for 4 min. After that, 1 mL of freshly prepared 10% (w/w) Na2CO3 solution was added to each sample. Then, the mixed solution was diluted with deionized water to a final volume of 25 mL and stored at room temperature for 2 h. Then, we measured the absorbance of the solution at 765 nm using a spectrophotometer (UV-5500PC, Shanghai Metash Instrument Co., Ltd., China). We calculated the total polyphenols content using a calibration curve, and gallic acid was used as the reference substance for preparing the calibration curve. The total polyphenols content is expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE) in mg/g samples.


### 2.5. Measurement of the Total Flavonoids

The total flavonoids (TF) content of each sample was determined by a colorimetric method as described in the literature [26] with a slight modification. In brief, each sample (1 mL) was mixed with 2 mL of distilled water and 0.5 mL of sodium nitrite (5%). The mixtures were gently oscillated and allowed to stand at room temperature for 6 min. After that, 0.5 mL of aluminum nitrate (10%) was added to the mixed solutions, and they were left to stand for an additional 6 min. Then, 2.5 mL of sodium hydroxide (5%) was added. After 15 min, 2.5 mL of distilled water was added to make the final volume 9 mL, and the absorbance of the dilute solution was measured at 500 nm using a spectrophotometer. Rutin was used as the standard. The total flavonoids content is expressed as rutin equivalents (RE) in mg/g samples.


### 2.6. Measurement of the Oligomeric Proanthocyanidins (OPC)

The OPC content of each sample was determined by then-butyl alcohol-hydrochloric acid method [27]. The samples (1 mL) were mixed with 0.2 mL of ammonium ferric sulfate (2% in 2 M hydrochloric acid) and 6 mL of n-butyl alcohol-hydrochloric acid (95 : 5, v/v). Then, the mixture was incubated in a water bath at 95°C for 40 min. After cooling, the absorbance of the solution was determined at 546 nm. The extract of grape seeds (90%) was used as the standard.


### 2.7. Determination of the Antioxidant Activity

#### 2.7.1. DPPH Free Radical-Scavenging Activity Assay

The radical-scavenging activities of the samples were measured according to the method described by Yang et al. [28] with a slight modification. Briefly, 0.4 mL of the samples at various concentrations (0.1–0.2 mg/mL) was added to 3 mL of DPPH solution (25 μg/mL) as the free radical source and left to stand for 30 min at room temperature. Then, the absorbance of each solution was determined at 517 nm. The same concentrations of L-AA, BHA, and BHT were used as references to compare with the activities of the plant extracts. The DPPH radical-scavenging activity was calculated using the following equation: (1)I=1-A1A0×100%.I is inhibition ratio, IC50 is half of the maximum inhibitory concentration; A0 is the absorbance of the control; A1 is the absorbance of the sample


#### 2.7.2. ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization Assay

The ABTS radical-scavenging activities of the samples were determined according to the method described by Arnao et al. [29] with a slight modification. The working solution was prepared by mixing equal volumes of 7.4 mM ABTS solution and 2.6 mM K2S2O8 solution and leaving the mixture to stand at room temperature for 12 h in the dark. A 1 mL aliquot of the mixed solution was added to 47 mL of methanol to obtain a solution with an absorbance of 7.0±0.02 units at 744 nm. Fresh ABTS solution was prepared for each assay. Aliquots of 0.15 mL of solutions of different concentrations (0.047–0.1 mg/mL) were added to 2.85 mL of ABTS solution, and the mixture was left at room temperature for 2 h in the dark. Different concentrations of L-AA, BHA, and BHT were used as reference experiments to compare with the activities of the plant extracts. The absorbance at 744 nm was determined using a spectrophotometer. A standard curve of Trolox in concentrations ranging from 50 to 600 μM was prepared. The ABTS radical-scavenging activity is expressed as μmol Trolox equivalents (TE)/g extracts.


#### 2.7.3. Reducing Power Assay

The reducing power of the extracts of the sarcocarp ofC. multifloruswas measured according to method of Liu et al. [30]. Solutions of the samples at different concentrations (0.2–0.04 mg/mL) were mixed with 2.5 mL of 0.2 mol/L phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL of a 1% (w/v) K3[Fe(CN)6] solution. The mixture was incubated for 20 min at 50°C in a water bath. After cooling, 2.5 mL of 10% (w/v) Cl3CCOOH solution was added and centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 10 min. A 2.5 mL aliquot of the upper layer was combined with 2.5 mL of deionized water and 0.5 mL of 0.1% (w/v) FeCl3 solution. After allowing the mixture to stand at room temperature for 10 min, the absorbance was determined at 707 nm. L-AA, BHA, and BHT were used as reference compounds. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was positively correlated with the reducing power.


#### 2.7.4. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

The FRAP assay is based on determining the antioxidant potentials of the samples through the reduction of the Fe3+-TPTZ complex to Fe2+-TPTZ by the presence of antioxidants according to the procedure described by Benzie and Strain [31]. The working solution was prepared freshly by mixing 2.5 mL of 20 mmol/L FeCl3 solution, 2.5 mL of 10 mmol/L TPTZ solution, and 25 mL of 300 mmol/L acetate buffer (pH 3.6). This solution was incubated at 37°C for 30 min and was used as the FRAP working solution. Different concentrations of sample solutions (0.15 mL) were reacted with 2.85 mL of FRAP solution for 30 min in a dark place. The absorbance of the Fe2+ -TPTZ complex was measured at 593 nm. L-AA, BHA, and BHT were used as positive controls. A standard curve was prepared using Trolox concentrations in the range of 50 to 600 mmol/L. The ferric reducing antioxidant activity is expressed as μmol Trolox equivalents (TE)/g extracts.


### 2.8. Lipid Peroxidation Inhibition Assay

The oxidative deterioration of the samples was investigated using the Schaal oven test according to Economou et al. [32]. Solutions of the samples at different concentrations (10, 20, 40, and 80 μg/mL of the samples) were added to 50 mL of sunflower oil. Then, the oil samples were put in an oven at 65°C for 72 h. A blank sample was subjected to the same conditions without adding any additives. The absorbance was determined at 538 nm. The rate of autoxidation of the sunflower oil was measured based on the increase in 2-thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS). L-AA, BHT, and BHA were used as references for comparison. The contents in TBARS in untreated and treated samples were used to calculate the inhibition of lipid oxidation using the following equation:(2)I=1-A1A0×100%.I is inhibition ratio; A0 is the absorbance of the control; A1 is the absorbance of the sample.


## 2.1. Plant Material

Fresh fruits were manually picked from similar 3 m, 15-year-oldC. multiflorus trees in October 2017 from the outskirts of Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China. The material was identified by Professor Huiyan Gu of the Forestry College, Northeast Forestry University, China, and voucher specimens were placed in the herbarium. To keep the material stable, 1 kg picked ripe red fruits were stored in plastic bags in a freezer at −18°C until the experiment began. The moisture content of theC. multiflorus sarcocarps was 76%  ± 4%, and this value was used in every step of the following experiments.


## 2.2. Chemicals

Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, 2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS), 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ), 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), andL-ascorbic acid (L-AA) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Rutin and grape seed extracts (90%) were obtained from Tongtian Bio-Tech Co. (Shanghai, China).


## 2.3. Extraction Process

The pulp of the fresh fruits ofC. multifloruswas separated from the seeds, and 20 g of the pulp was extracted with 200 mL of ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v) for 24 h in a 500 mL round-bottomed flask in shaking water bath at 25°C. Then, the filtered solution was concentrated using a rotatory evaporator (Shensheng Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at 55°C and −0.09 MPa until the volume of the solution remained approximately steady. The aqueous suspension was partitioned into five fractions. One fraction was directly frozen to afford a powder, and this was taken as Sample 1. The other four fractions were reextracted with the same volume of ethyl acetate, n-hexane, ether, and methylene dichloride. The organic phases were dried under reduced pressure with a rotatory evaporator. These dried powders were named Sample 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. These samples were stored in a desiccator protected from light until further use.


## 2.4. Measurement of the Total Polyphenols

The Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method was used to estimate the total phenolic content in theC. multiflorusextracts and fractions based on the procedure of Velioglu et al. [25] with a slight modification. Briefly, 1 mL of each sample was mixed with 1 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent which was diluted by a factor of two using distilled water prior to use. Subsequently, the mixtures were gently oscillated and held at room temperature for 4 min. After that, 1 mL of freshly prepared 10% (w/w) Na2CO3 solution was added to each sample. Then, the mixed solution was diluted with deionized water to a final volume of 25 mL and stored at room temperature for 2 h. Then, we measured the absorbance of the solution at 765 nm using a spectrophotometer (UV-5500PC, Shanghai Metash Instrument Co., Ltd., China). We calculated the total polyphenols content using a calibration curve, and gallic acid was used as the reference substance for preparing the calibration curve. The total polyphenols content is expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE) in mg/g samples.


## 2.5. Measurement of the Total Flavonoids

The total flavonoids (TF) content of each sample was determined by a colorimetric method as described in the literature [26] with a slight modification. In brief, each sample (1 mL) was mixed with 2 mL of distilled water and 0.5 mL of sodium nitrite (5%). The mixtures were gently oscillated and allowed to stand at room temperature for 6 min. After that, 0.5 mL of aluminum nitrate (10%) was added to the mixed solutions, and they were left to stand for an additional 6 min. Then, 2.5 mL of sodium hydroxide (5%) was added. After 15 min, 2.5 mL of distilled water was added to make the final volume 9 mL, and the absorbance of the dilute solution was measured at 500 nm using a spectrophotometer. Rutin was used as the standard. The total flavonoids content is expressed as rutin equivalents (RE) in mg/g samples.


## 2.6. Measurement of the Oligomeric Proanthocyanidins (OPC)

The OPC content of each sample was determined by then-butyl alcohol-hydrochloric acid method [27]. The samples (1 mL) were mixed with 0.2 mL of ammonium ferric sulfate (2% in 2 M hydrochloric acid) and 6 mL of n-butyl alcohol-hydrochloric acid (95 : 5, v/v). Then, the mixture was incubated in a water bath at 95°C for 40 min. After cooling, the absorbance of the solution was determined at 546 nm. The extract of grape seeds (90%) was used as the standard.


## 2.7. Determination of the Antioxidant Activity

### 2.7.1. DPPH Free Radical-Scavenging Activity Assay

The radical-scavenging activities of the samples were measured according to the method described by Yang et al. [28] with a slight modification. Briefly, 0.4 mL of the samples at various concentrations (0.1–0.2 mg/mL) was added to 3 mL of DPPH solution (25 μg/mL) as the free radical source and left to stand for 30 min at room temperature. Then, the absorbance of each solution was determined at 517 nm. The same concentrations of L-AA, BHA, and BHT were used as references to compare with the activities of the plant extracts. The DPPH radical-scavenging activity was calculated using the following equation: (1)I=1-A1A0×100%.I is inhibition ratio, IC50 is half of the maximum inhibitory concentration; A0 is the absorbance of the control; A1 is the absorbance of the sample


### 2.7.2. ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization Assay

The ABTS radical-scavenging activities of the samples were determined according to the method described by Arnao et al. [29] with a slight modification. The working solution was prepared by mixing equal volumes of 7.4 mM ABTS solution and 2.6 mM K2S2O8 solution and leaving the mixture to stand at room temperature for 12 h in the dark. A 1 mL aliquot of the mixed solution was added to 47 mL of methanol to obtain a solution with an absorbance of 7.0±0.02 units at 744 nm. Fresh ABTS solution was prepared for each assay. Aliquots of 0.15 mL of solutions of different concentrations (0.047–0.1 mg/mL) were added to 2.85 mL of ABTS solution, and the mixture was left at room temperature for 2 h in the dark. Different concentrations of L-AA, BHA, and BHT were used as reference experiments to compare with the activities of the plant extracts. The absorbance at 744 nm was determined using a spectrophotometer. A standard curve of Trolox in concentrations ranging from 50 to 600 μM was prepared. The ABTS radical-scavenging activity is expressed as μmol Trolox equivalents (TE)/g extracts.


### 2.7.3. Reducing Power Assay

The reducing power of the extracts of the sarcocarp ofC. multifloruswas measured according to method of Liu et al. [30]. Solutions of the samples at different concentrations (0.2–0.04 mg/mL) were mixed with 2.5 mL of 0.2 mol/L phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL of a 1% (w/v) K3[Fe(CN)6] solution. The mixture was incubated for 20 min at 50°C in a water bath. After cooling, 2.5 mL of 10% (w/v) Cl3CCOOH solution was added and centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 10 min. A 2.5 mL aliquot of the upper layer was combined with 2.5 mL of deionized water and 0.5 mL of 0.1% (w/v) FeCl3 solution. After allowing the mixture to stand at room temperature for 10 min, the absorbance was determined at 707 nm. L-AA, BHA, and BHT were used as reference compounds. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was positively correlated with the reducing power.


### 2.7.4. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

The FRAP assay is based on determining the antioxidant potentials of the samples through the reduction of the Fe3+-TPTZ complex to Fe2+-TPTZ by the presence of antioxidants according to the procedure described by Benzie and Strain [31]. The working solution was prepared freshly by mixing 2.5 mL of 20 mmol/L FeCl3 solution, 2.5 mL of 10 mmol/L TPTZ solution, and 25 mL of 300 mmol/L acetate buffer (pH 3.6). This solution was incubated at 37°C for 30 min and was used as the FRAP working solution. Different concentrations of sample solutions (0.15 mL) were reacted with 2.85 mL of FRAP solution for 30 min in a dark place. The absorbance of the Fe2+ -TPTZ complex was measured at 593 nm. L-AA, BHA, and BHT were used as positive controls. A standard curve was prepared using Trolox concentrations in the range of 50 to 600 mmol/L. The ferric reducing antioxidant activity is expressed as μmol Trolox equivalents (TE)/g extracts.


## 2.7.1. DPPH Free Radical-Scavenging Activity Assay

The radical-scavenging activities of the samples were measured according to the method described by Yang et al. [28] with a slight modification. Briefly, 0.4 mL of the samples at various concentrations (0.1–0.2 mg/mL) was added to 3 mL of DPPH solution (25 μg/mL) as the free radical source and left to stand for 30 min at room temperature. Then, the absorbance of each solution was determined at 517 nm. The same concentrations of L-AA, BHA, and BHT were used as references to compare with the activities of the plant extracts. The DPPH radical-scavenging activity was calculated using the following equation: (1)I=1-A1A0×100%.I is inhibition ratio, IC50 is half of the maximum inhibitory concentration; A0 is the absorbance of the control; A1 is the absorbance of the sample


## 2.7.2. ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization Assay

The ABTS radical-scavenging activities of the samples were determined according to the method described by Arnao et al. [29] with a slight modification. The working solution was prepared by mixing equal volumes of 7.4 mM ABTS solution and 2.6 mM K2S2O8 solution and leaving the mixture to stand at room temperature for 12 h in the dark. A 1 mL aliquot of the mixed solution was added to 47 mL of methanol to obtain a solution with an absorbance of 7.0±0.02 units at 744 nm. Fresh ABTS solution was prepared for each assay. Aliquots of 0.15 mL of solutions of different concentrations (0.047–0.1 mg/mL) were added to 2.85 mL of ABTS solution, and the mixture was left at room temperature for 2 h in the dark. Different concentrations of L-AA, BHA, and BHT were used as reference experiments to compare with the activities of the plant extracts. The absorbance at 744 nm was determined using a spectrophotometer. A standard curve of Trolox in concentrations ranging from 50 to 600 μM was prepared. The ABTS radical-scavenging activity is expressed as μmol Trolox equivalents (TE)/g extracts.


## 2.7.3. Reducing Power Assay

The reducing power of the extracts of the sarcocarp ofC. multifloruswas measured according to method of Liu et al. [30]. Solutions of the samples at different concentrations (0.2–0.04 mg/mL) were mixed with 2.5 mL of 0.2 mol/L phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL of a 1% (w/v) K3[Fe(CN)6] solution. The mixture was incubated for 20 min at 50°C in a water bath. After cooling, 2.5 mL of 10% (w/v) Cl3CCOOH solution was added and centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 10 min. A 2.5 mL aliquot of the upper layer was combined with 2.5 mL of deionized water and 0.5 mL of 0.1% (w/v) FeCl3 solution. After allowing the mixture to stand at room temperature for 10 min, the absorbance was determined at 707 nm. L-AA, BHA, and BHT were used as reference compounds. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was positively correlated with the reducing power.


## 2.7.4. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

The FRAP assay is based on determining the antioxidant potentials of the samples through the reduction of the Fe3+-TPTZ complex to Fe2+-TPTZ by the presence of antioxidants according to the procedure described by Benzie and Strain [31]. The working solution was prepared freshly by mixing 2.5 mL of 20 mmol/L FeCl3 solution, 2.5 mL of 10 mmol/L TPTZ solution, and 25 mL of 300 mmol/L acetate buffer (pH 3.6). This solution was incubated at 37°C for 30 min and was used as the FRAP working solution. Different concentrations of sample solutions (0.15 mL) were reacted with 2.85 mL of FRAP solution for 30 min in a dark place. The absorbance of the Fe2+ -TPTZ complex was measured at 593 nm. L-AA, BHA, and BHT were used as positive controls. A standard curve was prepared using Trolox concentrations in the range of 50 to 600 mmol/L. The ferric reducing antioxidant activity is expressed as μmol Trolox equivalents (TE)/g extracts.


## 2.8. Lipid Peroxidation Inhibition Assay

The oxidative deterioration of the samples was investigated using the Schaal oven test according to Economou et al. [32]. Solutions of the samples at different concentrations (10, 20, 40, and 80 μg/mL of the samples) were added to 50 mL of sunflower oil. Then, the oil samples were put in an oven at 65°C for 72 h. A blank sample was subjected to the same conditions without adding any additives. The absorbance was determined at 538 nm. The rate of autoxidation of the sunflower oil was measured based on the increase in 2-thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS). L-AA, BHT, and BHA were used as references for comparison. The contents in TBARS in untreated and treated samples were used to calculate the inhibition of lipid oxidation using the following equation:(2)I=1-A1A0×100%.I is inhibition ratio; A0 is the absorbance of the control; A1 is the absorbance of the sample.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Total Polyphenols (TP), Total Flavonoids (TF), and Oligomeric Proanthocyanidins (OPC) Contents

The proportions of total polyphenols (TP), total flavonoids (TF), and oligomeric proanthocyanidins (OPC) for the five different extracts from the fresh sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus using different extraction solvents are shown in Table 1. Among the five samples, the highest contents of TP, TF, and OPC were found in Sample 2 (extracted with ethyl acetate), whereas the lowest contents of all three components were found in Sample 3 (extracted with n-hexane) based on the extraction efficiency. After partitioning into ethyl acetate, the concentrations of TP, TF, and OPC increased from 80.7±3.9 mg GAE/g, 112.4±5.4 mg RE/g, and 251.0±12.2 mg GSEE/g (in Sample 1) to 155.1±7.5 mg GAE/g, 226.9±11.0 mg RE/g, and 328.7±15.5 mg GSEE/g (in Sample 2, based on the extraction efficiency), respectively. The increases in the concentrations of TP, TF, and OPC are significant (P<0.05), which might indicate that most of the polyphenols, flavonoids, and oligomeric proanthocyanidins in the ethanol-water extract were more soluble in a less polar solvent, such as ethyl acetate. Ethyl acetate is an ester that can be found in fruit and wine. Ethyl acetate is manufactured in industry mainly via the reaction of ethanol and acetic acid. Due to its low toxicity, it is commonly used in extractions as a solvent. Ethyl acetate fractions were verified to be safe by acute toxicity study [33]. Therefore, the two samples with the highest contents of TP, TF, and OPC (Sample 1, Sample 2) were chosen for the following antioxidant activity assays.Table 1
Total polyphenol (TP), total flavonoid (TF), and oligomeric proanthocyanidins (OPC) content of five fractions fromC. multiflorus sarcocarp (values are mean ± SD of three replicate determinations).
Sample TPC (gallic acid equivalents (GAE) in mg/g samples)a TFC (rutin equivalents (RE) in mg/g sample)b OPCC (grape seed extract equivalents (GSEE) in mg/g sample)c FWB DWB EPB FWB DWB EPB FWB DWB EPB Sample 1 14.8 ± 0.7 38.6 ± 1.7 80.7 ± 3.9 20.6 ± 0.9 53.7 ± 2.2 112.4 ± 5.4 46.0 ± 1.8 120.0 ± 5.5 251.0 ± 12.2 Sample 2 6.7 ± 0.3 17.5 ± 0.8 155.1 ± 7.5 9.8 ± 0.5 25.6 ± 1.0 226.9 ± 11.0 14.2 ± 0.7 37.0 ± 1.5 328.7 ± 15.5 Sample 3 0.3 ± 0.0 0.9 ± 0.0 50.0 ± 1.6 0.3 ± 0.0 0.8 ± 0.0 45.6 ± 1.9 0.9 ± 0.0 2.3 ± 0.1 129.4 ± 5.6 Sample 4 4.6 ± 0.2 12.0 ± 0.5 122.3 ± 4.6 5.7 ± 0.2 14.9 ± 0.7 151.6 ± 7.3 6.4 ± 0.2 16.7 ± 0.9 170.2 ± 7.8 Sample 5 0.3 ± 0.0 0.7 ± 0.1 17.1 ± 0.8 0.2 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.0 13.8 ± 0.6 0.3 ± 0.0 0.7 ± 0.1 18.4 ± 0.9 FWB: fresh weight basis; DWB: dry weight basis; EPB: extracted powder basis.Totala polyphenol content, expressed in milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per gram. Totalb flavonoids content, expressed in milligrams of rutin equivalents per gram. Totalc oligomeric proanthocyanidins content, expressed in milligrams of grape seed extract equivalents per gram. Sample 1: the crude power extracted with ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v). Sample 2: the power reextracted from Sample 1 with ethyl acetate. Sample 3: the power reextracted from Sample 1 with n-hexane. Sample 4: the power reextracted from Sample 1 with ether. Sample 5: the power reextracted from Sample 1 with methylene dichloride.


### 3.2. Antioxidant Activity

#### 3.2.1. DPPH Radical-Scavenging Activity

The DPPH method has been used extensively to screen for antioxidant activityin vitro, and it is sufficiently sensitive to be detected at low concentrations [34, 35]. The DPPH radical-scavenging activities of different concentrations of Sample 1, Sample 2, and the three standard solutions (butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and L-ascorbic acid (L-AA)) are shown in Figure 1. In addition, the IC50 was calculated from the equation of the regression curve. It can be seen that the two samples exhibited varying degrees of scavenging capacities. Sample 2 showed greater activity in a dose-dependent manner and showed an IC50 value of 42.72 μg/mL, which is higher than that of Sample 1 (the IC50 could not be determined from the regression equation) and comparable to those of BHA (34.39 μg/mL), BHT (40.75 μg/mL), and L-AA (40.74 μg/mL). The increase in these curves illustrates that more concentrated solutions of these compounds have greater DPPH radical-scavenging activities. The results show that some or all of the components of the ethyl acetate fraction have significant strong DPPH radical-scavenging activitiesin vitro. Similar results have been reported in the literature [36].Figure 1
Free radical-scavenging activity of extracts fromC. multiflorus sarcocarp measured by DPPH assay. Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


#### 3.2.2. ABTS Radical-Scavenging Activity

The ABTS assay is an elegant method for investigating the antioxidant activity of chain-breaking antioxidants and of hydrogen-donating antioxidants [37]. The results with various concentrations of the two samples and the three standard solutions (BHA, BHT, and L-AA) are shown in Figure 2. Compared with the results of the DPPH radical-scavenging activity, Sample 2 showed greater ABTS radical-scavenging activity than those of all the positive controls. There is a significant difference between the activities of Sample 1 and Sample 2. The results suggested that the components in Sample 2 might quench both ABTS and DPPH free radicals.Figure 2
Free radical-scavenging activity of extracts fromC. multiflorus sarcocarp measured by ABTS assay. Results are mean ± SD (n=3). Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


#### 3.2.3. Reducing Power

It can be seen from the literature that the electron donating capacity of the component is a significant indicator of its potential antioxidant activity [38]. The antioxidant activities of the two samples and the three standard solutions (BHA, BHT, and L-AA), as reflected in their reducing power, are presented in Figure 3. In this assay, as well as in the first two assays, the reducing powers of the two samples and three positive controls were concentration-dependent. The reducing power of Sample 2 is just as strong as those of BHA and BHT, although they were all inferior to that of L-AA. In addition, a much lower reducing power was found for Sample 1. It can be seen that the ethyl acetate fraction shows a much higher reducing power than the ethanol-water fraction. Based on this result, the ethyl acetate fraction can more easily transfer electrons to the reactive radicals and convert them to more stable, nonreactive species.Figure 3
Antioxidant activity of extracts fromC. multiflorus sarcocarp measured by reducing power assay. Results are mean ± SD (n=3). Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


#### 3.2.4. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The FRAP assay is a quick and simple test for estimating the antioxidant capacity of any component in a reaction medium in terms of its reducing power. The antioxidant potentials of the extracts and fractions from the sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus were evaluated based on their capacity to reduce the TPTZ-Fe3+ complex to the TPTZ-Fe2+ complex. The antioxidant potentials of Sample 1 and Sample 2 from the sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus were estimated from their ferric ion-reducing activities as shown in Figure 4. The FRAP of Sample 2 is higher than L-AA, BHT, and Sample 1, although it is somewhat lower than that of BHA. Sample 1 showed the lowest ferric ion-reducing activities. Sample 2 had a strong ability to reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+.Figure 4
Antioxidant activity of extracts from the sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus plus positive controls by using FRAP method. Results are mean ± SD (n=3). Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


#### 3.2.5. Lipid Peroxidation in Sunflower Oil

The process of the lipid peroxidation consists of the fatty acids of the lipid reacting with the oxidant to generate primary oxidation products, which then decompose into small molecules such as dialdehydes, ketones, and acids, known as secondary oxidation products. These secondary oxidation products can give the oil an unpleasant odor. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is a secondary oxidation product, and it can be used as an indicator of the degree of lipid oxidation. In Figure5, we can see that Sample 2 has a strong ability of preventing the peroxidation of sunflower oil. At the same concentration, the inhibitory effects on the oxidation of LDL of the samples decreased in the order BHA > Sample 2 > L-AA > BHT > Sample 1. These results suggested that the compounds extracted by ethyl acetate can reduce the production of the oxidized intermediates during lipid peroxidation.Figure 5
Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) assay of extracts from the sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus plus positive controls. Results are mean ± SD (n=3). Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


## 3.1. Total Polyphenols (TP), Total Flavonoids (TF), and Oligomeric Proanthocyanidins (OPC) Contents

The proportions of total polyphenols (TP), total flavonoids (TF), and oligomeric proanthocyanidins (OPC) for the five different extracts from the fresh sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus using different extraction solvents are shown in Table 1. Among the five samples, the highest contents of TP, TF, and OPC were found in Sample 2 (extracted with ethyl acetate), whereas the lowest contents of all three components were found in Sample 3 (extracted with n-hexane) based on the extraction efficiency. After partitioning into ethyl acetate, the concentrations of TP, TF, and OPC increased from 80.7±3.9 mg GAE/g, 112.4±5.4 mg RE/g, and 251.0±12.2 mg GSEE/g (in Sample 1) to 155.1±7.5 mg GAE/g, 226.9±11.0 mg RE/g, and 328.7±15.5 mg GSEE/g (in Sample 2, based on the extraction efficiency), respectively. The increases in the concentrations of TP, TF, and OPC are significant (P<0.05), which might indicate that most of the polyphenols, flavonoids, and oligomeric proanthocyanidins in the ethanol-water extract were more soluble in a less polar solvent, such as ethyl acetate. Ethyl acetate is an ester that can be found in fruit and wine. Ethyl acetate is manufactured in industry mainly via the reaction of ethanol and acetic acid. Due to its low toxicity, it is commonly used in extractions as a solvent. Ethyl acetate fractions were verified to be safe by acute toxicity study [33]. Therefore, the two samples with the highest contents of TP, TF, and OPC (Sample 1, Sample 2) were chosen for the following antioxidant activity assays.Table 1
Total polyphenol (TP), total flavonoid (TF), and oligomeric proanthocyanidins (OPC) content of five fractions fromC. multiflorus sarcocarp (values are mean ± SD of three replicate determinations).
Sample TPC (gallic acid equivalents (GAE) in mg/g samples)a TFC (rutin equivalents (RE) in mg/g sample)b OPCC (grape seed extract equivalents (GSEE) in mg/g sample)c FWB DWB EPB FWB DWB EPB FWB DWB EPB Sample 1 14.8 ± 0.7 38.6 ± 1.7 80.7 ± 3.9 20.6 ± 0.9 53.7 ± 2.2 112.4 ± 5.4 46.0 ± 1.8 120.0 ± 5.5 251.0 ± 12.2 Sample 2 6.7 ± 0.3 17.5 ± 0.8 155.1 ± 7.5 9.8 ± 0.5 25.6 ± 1.0 226.9 ± 11.0 14.2 ± 0.7 37.0 ± 1.5 328.7 ± 15.5 Sample 3 0.3 ± 0.0 0.9 ± 0.0 50.0 ± 1.6 0.3 ± 0.0 0.8 ± 0.0 45.6 ± 1.9 0.9 ± 0.0 2.3 ± 0.1 129.4 ± 5.6 Sample 4 4.6 ± 0.2 12.0 ± 0.5 122.3 ± 4.6 5.7 ± 0.2 14.9 ± 0.7 151.6 ± 7.3 6.4 ± 0.2 16.7 ± 0.9 170.2 ± 7.8 Sample 5 0.3 ± 0.0 0.7 ± 0.1 17.1 ± 0.8 0.2 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.0 13.8 ± 0.6 0.3 ± 0.0 0.7 ± 0.1 18.4 ± 0.9 FWB: fresh weight basis; DWB: dry weight basis; EPB: extracted powder basis.Totala polyphenol content, expressed in milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per gram. Totalb flavonoids content, expressed in milligrams of rutin equivalents per gram. Totalc oligomeric proanthocyanidins content, expressed in milligrams of grape seed extract equivalents per gram. Sample 1: the crude power extracted with ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v). Sample 2: the power reextracted from Sample 1 with ethyl acetate. Sample 3: the power reextracted from Sample 1 with n-hexane. Sample 4: the power reextracted from Sample 1 with ether. Sample 5: the power reextracted from Sample 1 with methylene dichloride.


## 3.2. Antioxidant Activity

### 3.2.1. DPPH Radical-Scavenging Activity

The DPPH method has been used extensively to screen for antioxidant activityin vitro, and it is sufficiently sensitive to be detected at low concentrations [34, 35]. The DPPH radical-scavenging activities of different concentrations of Sample 1, Sample 2, and the three standard solutions (butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and L-ascorbic acid (L-AA)) are shown in Figure 1. In addition, the IC50 was calculated from the equation of the regression curve. It can be seen that the two samples exhibited varying degrees of scavenging capacities. Sample 2 showed greater activity in a dose-dependent manner and showed an IC50 value of 42.72 μg/mL, which is higher than that of Sample 1 (the IC50 could not be determined from the regression equation) and comparable to those of BHA (34.39 μg/mL), BHT (40.75 μg/mL), and L-AA (40.74 μg/mL). The increase in these curves illustrates that more concentrated solutions of these compounds have greater DPPH radical-scavenging activities. The results show that some or all of the components of the ethyl acetate fraction have significant strong DPPH radical-scavenging activitiesin vitro. Similar results have been reported in the literature [36].Figure 1
Free radical-scavenging activity of extracts fromC. multiflorus sarcocarp measured by DPPH assay. Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


### 3.2.2. ABTS Radical-Scavenging Activity

The ABTS assay is an elegant method for investigating the antioxidant activity of chain-breaking antioxidants and of hydrogen-donating antioxidants [37]. The results with various concentrations of the two samples and the three standard solutions (BHA, BHT, and L-AA) are shown in Figure 2. Compared with the results of the DPPH radical-scavenging activity, Sample 2 showed greater ABTS radical-scavenging activity than those of all the positive controls. There is a significant difference between the activities of Sample 1 and Sample 2. The results suggested that the components in Sample 2 might quench both ABTS and DPPH free radicals.Figure 2
Free radical-scavenging activity of extracts fromC. multiflorus sarcocarp measured by ABTS assay. Results are mean ± SD (n=3). Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


### 3.2.3. Reducing Power

It can be seen from the literature that the electron donating capacity of the component is a significant indicator of its potential antioxidant activity [38]. The antioxidant activities of the two samples and the three standard solutions (BHA, BHT, and L-AA), as reflected in their reducing power, are presented in Figure 3. In this assay, as well as in the first two assays, the reducing powers of the two samples and three positive controls were concentration-dependent. The reducing power of Sample 2 is just as strong as those of BHA and BHT, although they were all inferior to that of L-AA. In addition, a much lower reducing power was found for Sample 1. It can be seen that the ethyl acetate fraction shows a much higher reducing power than the ethanol-water fraction. Based on this result, the ethyl acetate fraction can more easily transfer electrons to the reactive radicals and convert them to more stable, nonreactive species.Figure 3
Antioxidant activity of extracts fromC. multiflorus sarcocarp measured by reducing power assay. Results are mean ± SD (n=3). Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


### 3.2.4. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The FRAP assay is a quick and simple test for estimating the antioxidant capacity of any component in a reaction medium in terms of its reducing power. The antioxidant potentials of the extracts and fractions from the sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus were evaluated based on their capacity to reduce the TPTZ-Fe3+ complex to the TPTZ-Fe2+ complex. The antioxidant potentials of Sample 1 and Sample 2 from the sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus were estimated from their ferric ion-reducing activities as shown in Figure 4. The FRAP of Sample 2 is higher than L-AA, BHT, and Sample 1, although it is somewhat lower than that of BHA. Sample 1 showed the lowest ferric ion-reducing activities. Sample 2 had a strong ability to reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+.Figure 4
Antioxidant activity of extracts from the sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus plus positive controls by using FRAP method. Results are mean ± SD (n=3). Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


### 3.2.5. Lipid Peroxidation in Sunflower Oil

The process of the lipid peroxidation consists of the fatty acids of the lipid reacting with the oxidant to generate primary oxidation products, which then decompose into small molecules such as dialdehydes, ketones, and acids, known as secondary oxidation products. These secondary oxidation products can give the oil an unpleasant odor. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is a secondary oxidation product, and it can be used as an indicator of the degree of lipid oxidation. In Figure5, we can see that Sample 2 has a strong ability of preventing the peroxidation of sunflower oil. At the same concentration, the inhibitory effects on the oxidation of LDL of the samples decreased in the order BHA > Sample 2 > L-AA > BHT > Sample 1. These results suggested that the compounds extracted by ethyl acetate can reduce the production of the oxidized intermediates during lipid peroxidation.Figure 5
Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) assay of extracts from the sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus plus positive controls. Results are mean ± SD (n=3). Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


## 3.2.1. DPPH Radical-Scavenging Activity

The DPPH method has been used extensively to screen for antioxidant activityin vitro, and it is sufficiently sensitive to be detected at low concentrations [34, 35]. The DPPH radical-scavenging activities of different concentrations of Sample 1, Sample 2, and the three standard solutions (butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and L-ascorbic acid (L-AA)) are shown in Figure 1. In addition, the IC50 was calculated from the equation of the regression curve. It can be seen that the two samples exhibited varying degrees of scavenging capacities. Sample 2 showed greater activity in a dose-dependent manner and showed an IC50 value of 42.72 μg/mL, which is higher than that of Sample 1 (the IC50 could not be determined from the regression equation) and comparable to those of BHA (34.39 μg/mL), BHT (40.75 μg/mL), and L-AA (40.74 μg/mL). The increase in these curves illustrates that more concentrated solutions of these compounds have greater DPPH radical-scavenging activities. The results show that some or all of the components of the ethyl acetate fraction have significant strong DPPH radical-scavenging activitiesin vitro. Similar results have been reported in the literature [36].Figure 1
Free radical-scavenging activity of extracts fromC. multiflorus sarcocarp measured by DPPH assay. Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


## 3.2.2. ABTS Radical-Scavenging Activity

The ABTS assay is an elegant method for investigating the antioxidant activity of chain-breaking antioxidants and of hydrogen-donating antioxidants [37]. The results with various concentrations of the two samples and the three standard solutions (BHA, BHT, and L-AA) are shown in Figure 2. Compared with the results of the DPPH radical-scavenging activity, Sample 2 showed greater ABTS radical-scavenging activity than those of all the positive controls. There is a significant difference between the activities of Sample 1 and Sample 2. The results suggested that the components in Sample 2 might quench both ABTS and DPPH free radicals.Figure 2
Free radical-scavenging activity of extracts fromC. multiflorus sarcocarp measured by ABTS assay. Results are mean ± SD (n=3). Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


## 3.2.3. Reducing Power

It can be seen from the literature that the electron donating capacity of the component is a significant indicator of its potential antioxidant activity [38]. The antioxidant activities of the two samples and the three standard solutions (BHA, BHT, and L-AA), as reflected in their reducing power, are presented in Figure 3. In this assay, as well as in the first two assays, the reducing powers of the two samples and three positive controls were concentration-dependent. The reducing power of Sample 2 is just as strong as those of BHA and BHT, although they were all inferior to that of L-AA. In addition, a much lower reducing power was found for Sample 1. It can be seen that the ethyl acetate fraction shows a much higher reducing power than the ethanol-water fraction. Based on this result, the ethyl acetate fraction can more easily transfer electrons to the reactive radicals and convert them to more stable, nonreactive species.Figure 3
Antioxidant activity of extracts fromC. multiflorus sarcocarp measured by reducing power assay. Results are mean ± SD (n=3). Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


## 3.2.4. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The FRAP assay is a quick and simple test for estimating the antioxidant capacity of any component in a reaction medium in terms of its reducing power. The antioxidant potentials of the extracts and fractions from the sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus were evaluated based on their capacity to reduce the TPTZ-Fe3+ complex to the TPTZ-Fe2+ complex. The antioxidant potentials of Sample 1 and Sample 2 from the sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus were estimated from their ferric ion-reducing activities as shown in Figure 4. The FRAP of Sample 2 is higher than L-AA, BHT, and Sample 1, although it is somewhat lower than that of BHA. Sample 1 showed the lowest ferric ion-reducing activities. Sample 2 had a strong ability to reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+.Figure 4
Antioxidant activity of extracts from the sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus plus positive controls by using FRAP method. Results are mean ± SD (n=3). Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


## 3.2.5. Lipid Peroxidation in Sunflower Oil

The process of the lipid peroxidation consists of the fatty acids of the lipid reacting with the oxidant to generate primary oxidation products, which then decompose into small molecules such as dialdehydes, ketones, and acids, known as secondary oxidation products. These secondary oxidation products can give the oil an unpleasant odor. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is a secondary oxidation product, and it can be used as an indicator of the degree of lipid oxidation. In Figure5, we can see that Sample 2 has a strong ability of preventing the peroxidation of sunflower oil. At the same concentration, the inhibitory effects on the oxidation of LDL of the samples decreased in the order BHA > Sample 2 > L-AA > BHT > Sample 1. These results suggested that the compounds extracted by ethyl acetate can reduce the production of the oxidized intermediates during lipid peroxidation.Figure 5
Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) assay of extracts from the sarcocarp ofC. multiflorus plus positive controls. Results are mean ± SD (n=3). Sample 1: the sample extracted by ethanol-water (7 : 3, v/v); Sample 2: the sample reextracted from Sample 1 by ethyl acetate.


## 4. Conclusions

This work highlights the importance ofC. multiflorus sarcocarp, which has been traditionally used as ornamental and medicinal plant in China and as a rich source of natural antioxidants. More specifically, the contents of total polyphenols (155.1±7.5 mg/g), total flavonoids (226.9±11.0 mg/g), and the oligomeric proanthocyanidins (328.7±15.5 mg/g) of the sample partitioned into ethyl acetate were higher (determined based on the dry powdered extracts) than the fractions of other solvents. Moreover, this sample showed the highestin vitro antioxidant and free radical-scavenging activities with the IC50 value of 42.72 μg/mL (based on second-degree polynomials equation: Y=-0.0049x2+1.2322x+6.3052, R2=0.9981) for DPPH radical-scavenging activitiesin vitro. Therefore, the present work provides powerful and useful information about the antioxidant activities of this plant.



---

*Source: 4619768-2018-05-13.xml*