# Gold Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stability Test, and Application for the Rice Growth

Authors: Aiwu Wang; Hoi Pong Ng; Yi Xu; Yuyu Li; Yuhong Zheng; Jingping Yu; Fugui Han; Feng Peng; Li Fu
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

In today’s science, with the use of nanotechnology, nanomaterials, which behave very differently from the bulk solid, can be made. One of the capable uses of nanomaterials is bioapplications which make good use of the specific properties of nanoparticles. However, since the nanoparticles will be used bothin-vivo and in-vitro, their stability is an important issue to the scientists, concern. In this dissertation, we are going to test the stability of gold nanoparticles in a number of media including the biocompatible medium and their behaviors will be illustrated in terms of optical properties change and aggregation degree. Herein, we report the synthesis of gold nanoparticles of different shapes and applications for the rice growth with significant difference. The gold nanoparticles can inhibit the elongation of rice root without inhibiting the germination of rice seeds.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are also called colloidal gold or gold colloids. Similar to semiconductors, when metals decrease their size from bulk to the nanoscale, they also experience quantum confinement effect [1]. The conduction band electrons of the metal nanoparticles will resonate with the electromagnetic field, that is, light, and hence cause light absorption; this phenomenon is known as surface plasmon resonance [2–5]. Surface plasmon resonance was explained by Mie in 1908 [6]. However, at that time, Mie’s theory could only be applied on metal nanoparticles which are much smaller than wavelength of light (about 25 nm) due to the assumption of the theory. The theory shows that plasmon absorption is size independent [7–9]. By the full expression of Mie’s theory, it can be applied to large metal nanoparticles (>25 nm) and can show size dependence of plasmon absorption [10–13].Since the plasmon absorption maximum of AuNPs is size dependent [14–19], by tuning their size, their absorption maximum and color can be tuned.Although gold is one of the most stable elements in the world, when AuNPs with diameter smaller than 5 nm are deposited on select metal oxides, they exhibit extraordinary selectivities and/or activities in some reactions such as combustion of carbon monoxide and saturated hydrocarbons [20] which show catalytic property.In the presence of light, the conduction band electrons of AuNPs oscillate due to surface plasmon resonance. The oscillating electrons interact with the crystal lattice of AuNPs and transfer thermal energy to the lattice. Thus, AuNPs are heated up and can further dissipate their thermal energy to the surrounding medium to achieve the heating effect [21].


## 2. Experimental Parts

### 2.1. Synthesis of Citrate Gold Nanoparticles

First, 25 mL of water and a magnetic stir bar were added into a flask and the flask was placed on stirrer and heated to 100°C. Second, 52.4 mg of HAuCl4 was weighed in a dry 100 mL flask and was placed on a stirrer. Then, 75 mL of water was added and the gold salt was dissolved under stirring. After all of the gold salt was dissolved, 10 mL of the solution was poured into the hot water flask. Next, citrate stock solution was prepared by dissolving 506.3 mg Na3C6H5O7·2H2O in 75 mL of Milli-Q water. After the gold solution was boiled, 4 mL of citrate stock solution was added and the solution was boiled for 1.5 hours. After 1.5 hours, the flask was put onto a table and we waited till it cools down. Finally, the solution was stored in a 50 mL test tube at room temperature without any special treatment.


### 2.2. Synthesis of CTAB Gold Nanoparticles

First, 100 mL of 0.1 M CTAB, 10 mL of 0.01 M HAuCl4, 5 mL of 0.1 M of ascorbic acid, and 10 mL of 0.01 M of AgNO3 solution were prepared. The CTAB solution was heated to 30°C in a water bath. Then, 3 mL of 0.1 M CTAB was added into a test tube. 1.748 mL of Milli-Q water, 200 μL HAuCl4, and 32 μL ascorbic acid were added one by one. The solution was mixed gently after each addition. Next, 20 μL of 0.01 M silver nitrate was added into the test tube and we waited for 4 seconds before gently mixing it. After the solution was prepared, it was placed inside a 30°C water bath and we waited for 3 hours for complete reaction. Finally, the solution was washed twice by centrifuging at 4500 rmp for 5 min each time and then it was stored at room temperature.


## 2.1. Synthesis of Citrate Gold Nanoparticles

First, 25 mL of water and a magnetic stir bar were added into a flask and the flask was placed on stirrer and heated to 100°C. Second, 52.4 mg of HAuCl4 was weighed in a dry 100 mL flask and was placed on a stirrer. Then, 75 mL of water was added and the gold salt was dissolved under stirring. After all of the gold salt was dissolved, 10 mL of the solution was poured into the hot water flask. Next, citrate stock solution was prepared by dissolving 506.3 mg Na3C6H5O7·2H2O in 75 mL of Milli-Q water. After the gold solution was boiled, 4 mL of citrate stock solution was added and the solution was boiled for 1.5 hours. After 1.5 hours, the flask was put onto a table and we waited till it cools down. Finally, the solution was stored in a 50 mL test tube at room temperature without any special treatment.


## 2.2. Synthesis of CTAB Gold Nanoparticles

First, 100 mL of 0.1 M CTAB, 10 mL of 0.01 M HAuCl4, 5 mL of 0.1 M of ascorbic acid, and 10 mL of 0.01 M of AgNO3 solution were prepared. The CTAB solution was heated to 30°C in a water bath. Then, 3 mL of 0.1 M CTAB was added into a test tube. 1.748 mL of Milli-Q water, 200 μL HAuCl4, and 32 μL ascorbic acid were added one by one. The solution was mixed gently after each addition. Next, 20 μL of 0.01 M silver nitrate was added into the test tube and we waited for 4 seconds before gently mixing it. After the solution was prepared, it was placed inside a 30°C water bath and we waited for 3 hours for complete reaction. Finally, the solution was washed twice by centrifuging at 4500 rmp for 5 min each time and then it was stored at room temperature.


## 3. Results and Discussion

From Figure1(a), we can observe that the CTAB AuNPs are star shaped with the longest dimension in between 80 and 90 nm. So it is expected that we can observe two peaks or one peak and one shoulder from the absorption spectra.(a) TEM image of CTAB AuNPs. (b) TEM image of citrate AuNPs.
(a)
(b)Figure1(b) shows that the citrate AuNPs are almost spherical in shape with the diameter from about 30 to 50 nm. The larger, brighter, and irregular shaped particles on the left hand side should be the precipitated citrate.From Figure2, we can observe that citrate AuNPs have a peak and a shoulder while citrate AuNPs only have one peak.Figure 2
Absorption spectra of citrate and CTAB AuNPs.


### 3.1. Stability of CTAB AuNPs in Different Media

Table1 showed the absorption peak position and intensity of CTAB AuNPs.Table 1
Absorption peak position and intensity variation of CTAB AuNPs with time in different media.
Hour
Position 1
Position 2
Intensity 1%
Intensity 2%
Water
0
639
840—
100
100
0.25
639
840—
100
100
0.5
639
840—
100
100
1
639
840—
100
100
2
639
840—
100
100
72
639
840—
94
93
168
639
840—
102
102
pH 4 buffer
0
640
852.2—
90
104
0.25
617
852.2—
63
87
0.5
617
852.2—
57
79
1
617
852.2—
53
73
2
617
852.2—
48
66
72
640—
852.2—
7
9
168
640—
852.2—
25
29
pH 7 buffer
0
623
851
80
98
0.25
620
851—
57
74
0.5
620
851—
53
67
1
620
851—
50
63
2
620
851—
44
57
72
623—
851—
1
2
168
623—
851—
14
16
pH 8 buffer
0
629
850
84
105
0.25
607
850—
56
78
0.5
607
850—
52
70
1
607
850—
48
65
2
607
850—
43
60
72
629—
850—
1
1
168
629—
850—
18
21
pH 10 buffer
0
631
836
90
97
0.25
611
836—
53
71
0.5
611
836—
47
64
1
611
836—
42
53
2
611
836—
36
48
72
631—
836—
2
2
168
631—
836—
17
21
Biobuffer
0
560
584
61
68
0.25
560
585
60
67
0.5
560
586
60
66
1
560
587
59
67
2
560
588
59
67
3
560
588
59
67
72
560
584—
59
65
168
560
584—
57
64
*
*For the number with “—” behind means no clear peak can be observed and we measure the intensity at that wavelength.


#### 3.1.1. CTAB AuNPs in Milli-Q Water and Biobuffer

The absorption intensities of CTAB AuNPs in both Milli-Q water and biobuffer are very stable within the time of inspection. And their absorption peak positions were very stable too. These mean that CTAB AuNPs were very stable in both Milli-Q water and biobuffer.


#### 3.1.2. CTAB AuNPs in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 Buffers

CTAB AuNPs behave similarly in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers. They showed a rapid drop in absorption intensities in the first 15 minutes and decreased slowly afterwards. Meanwhile, their absorption peak positions also demonstrated a blue shift in the first 15 minutes and remained unchanged up to 2 hours. Subsequently, their absorption intensities dropped to a few intensity percentages and no peaks can be observed at the third day. However, their absorption intensities increased again at the seventh day; this may be because the CTAB AuNPs form larger aggregates than those at the third day; therefore, scattering of the CTAB AuNPs increased. These represented that CTAB AuNPs are not stable in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers.To sum up, CTAB AuNPs were very stable in Milli-Q water and biobuffer; this indicated that they can be used for bioapplications. But they were unstable in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers.


### 3.2. Stability of Citrate AuNPs in Different Media

Citrate has a shorter carbon length than CTAB. As there is no big difference in peak position, only the absorption peak intensity variation was shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Absorption peak intensity of citrate AuNPs in different media varies with time.


#### 3.2.1. Citrate AuNPs in Milli-Q Water and Biobuffer

We can observe that the absorption peak intensities of citrate AuNPs in Milli-Q water and biobuffer were very stable within the period of inspection. And their absorption peak position in Milli-Q water and biobuffer was always the same in the experimental time. These represented that citrate AuNPs were very stable in Milli-Q water and biobuffer.


#### 3.2.2. Citrate AuNPs in pH 4, pH 7, and pH 10 Buffers

Citrate AuNPs perform similarly in pH 4, pH 7, and pH 10 buffers. All of them showed fast drop in absorption peak intensity in the first 15 minutes and then dropped slowly thereafter. At the fourth day, they only have about 5% absorption peak intensity. Moreover, the absorption peak position of pH 4 buffer showed small red shift from 524 nm at 0 minutes to 533 nm at 2 hours which may be because of the increase in aggregate size and showed a large blue shift to 507 nm at the fourth day; this may be due to the degradation of citrate AuNPs which have a smaller size than their size at 0 minutes. But the absorption peak positions of citrate AuNPs in pH 7 and pH 10 buffers were almost the same within the first 2 hours and then no peaks can be found afterwards. These phenomena mean that citrate AuNPs are unstable in pH 4, pH 7, and pH 10 buffers.


#### 3.2.3. Citrate AuNPs in pH 8 Buffer

The absorption peak intensity of citrate AuNPs in pH 8 buffer decreases slowly within the first 2 hours and then drops to about 40% intensity thereafter. And their absorption peak position was almost the same with the experimental time. Thus, they are unstable in pH 8 buffer in terms of absorption peak intensity.To sum up, citrate AuNPs were very stable in Milli-Q water and biobuffer which made them able to be used for bioapplications. But they were unstable in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers. Compared with the first absorption peak of CTAB AuNPs, both of them showed similar behavior for all buffers, that is, being unstable in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers but very stable in Milli-Q water and biobuffer, which allows them to be used for bioapplications.


### 3.3. Zeta Potential and Size of Citrate AuNPs

For the citrate AuNPs in Milli-Q water, referring to Table2, it is noted that the zeta potential is very good at 0 hours but decreased with time in the first 3 hours. At the same time, the color of the citrate AuNPs in the zeta cell for zeta potential measurement fades out after each measurement. This may be because in the measurement of zeta potential the citrate AuNPs adhere to the surface of the gold-plated electrodes.Table 2
Zeta potential and size of citrate AuNPs in Milli-Q water.
Time (hour)
Zeta potential (mV)
Zeta potential (mV)(second measure)
Size 1 (nm)
Size 2 (nm)
0
−27.5
—
5.6
50.8
1
−16.1
—
5.6
50.8
2
−19.0
—
5.6
50.8
3
−17.1
−32.2
5.6
50.8
24
−37.5
—
5.6
50.8
72
−33.4
—
5.6
50.8
168
−39.9
—
5.6
50.8
“—” means no measurement has been done.But if the citrate AuNPs in the zeta cell were replaced by the spare solution that has not been used for measurement before, a good zeta potential can be observed again, that is, zeta potential of second measurement of the 3 hours and measurement after 3 hours.And the size of the citrate AuNPs was the same for all time ranges. These were in good agreement with the absorption spectrum.From Table3, the zeta potential of the citrate AuNPs in pH 4 buffer was evenly more negative than that in Milli-Q water. But aggregation happened because some components in the buffer adsorb on the surface of the citrate AuNPs and crosslinks form in between AuNPs. These results agreed with the absorption spectrum.Table 3
Zeta potential and size of citrate AuNPs in pH 4 buffer.
Time (hour)
Zeta potential (mV)
Size (nm)
0
−46.1
342.0
1
−39.4
825.0
2
−38.8
531.2
3
−36.0
255.0
24
−33.0
295.3
72
−29.9
712.4
168
−13.9
141.8According to Table4, the zeta potential of citrate AuNPs in biobuffer was about 5 times lower than that in Milli-Q water at 0 hours. And size 1 was due to the biobuffer and size 2 was the size of the citrate AuNPs which was almost the same within the measurement period. As the zeta potential and size were stable with time, so it was in a good agreement with the absorption spectrum.Table 4
Zeta potential and size of citrate AuNPs in biobuffer.
Time (hour)
Zeta potential (mV)
Size 1 (nm)
Size 2 (nm)
0
−9.54
10.1
78.8
1
−10.6
5.6
122.4
2
−10.2
10.1
91.3
3
−10.5
10.1
78.8
24
−11.4
13.5
78.8
72
−11
11.7
78.8
168
−10.6
10.1
78.8To sum up, the zeta potentials of citrate AuNPs in Milli-Q water and biobuffer were very stable while those in pH 4 buffer were decreasing during the experiment. Moreover, their size in Milli-Q water and biobuffer was also stable for all times within the experimental period while they showed aggregation in pH 4 buffer.


### 3.4. Application for the Rice Growth

As citrate AuNPs were rather stable in water and biobuffer, they were used in the application for the rice growth.From Figure4 and Table 5 we can observe that with the AuNPs in a rather low concentration the rice roots stopped growing and the height of seedlings got influenced too; however the presence of AuNPs did not inhibit the germination of rice seed.Table 5
The height, number, and length for rice.
The height of seedlings
The number of roots
The length of roots
The ratio of root length and seedling height
CK
17.78 ± 1.82 Aa
7.50 ± 1.80 Aa
3.39 ± 1.35 Aa
0.191 Aa
T1
10.79 ± 3.03 Bb
6.90 ± 1.29 Aa
1.90 ± 0.74 Bb
0.176 Bb
T2
11.60 ± 0.15 Bb
7.30 ± 1.42 Aa
1.67 ± 0.50 Bb
0.144 Bb
Aa Bb are Significant symbols which commonly used in the Data Analysis. Use the uppercase and lowercase letters (A a) due to the significant results.Figure 4
Images of rice: no gold nanoparticles,5*10-6 M gold nanoparticles, and 5*10-8 M gold nanoparticles.


## 3.1. Stability of CTAB AuNPs in Different Media

Table1 showed the absorption peak position and intensity of CTAB AuNPs.Table 1
Absorption peak position and intensity variation of CTAB AuNPs with time in different media.
Hour
Position 1
Position 2
Intensity 1%
Intensity 2%
Water
0
639
840—
100
100
0.25
639
840—
100
100
0.5
639
840—
100
100
1
639
840—
100
100
2
639
840—
100
100
72
639
840—
94
93
168
639
840—
102
102
pH 4 buffer
0
640
852.2—
90
104
0.25
617
852.2—
63
87
0.5
617
852.2—
57
79
1
617
852.2—
53
73
2
617
852.2—
48
66
72
640—
852.2—
7
9
168
640—
852.2—
25
29
pH 7 buffer
0
623
851
80
98
0.25
620
851—
57
74
0.5
620
851—
53
67
1
620
851—
50
63
2
620
851—
44
57
72
623—
851—
1
2
168
623—
851—
14
16
pH 8 buffer
0
629
850
84
105
0.25
607
850—
56
78
0.5
607
850—
52
70
1
607
850—
48
65
2
607
850—
43
60
72
629—
850—
1
1
168
629—
850—
18
21
pH 10 buffer
0
631
836
90
97
0.25
611
836—
53
71
0.5
611
836—
47
64
1
611
836—
42
53
2
611
836—
36
48
72
631—
836—
2
2
168
631—
836—
17
21
Biobuffer
0
560
584
61
68
0.25
560
585
60
67
0.5
560
586
60
66
1
560
587
59
67
2
560
588
59
67
3
560
588
59
67
72
560
584—
59
65
168
560
584—
57
64
*
*For the number with “—” behind means no clear peak can be observed and we measure the intensity at that wavelength.


### 3.1.1. CTAB AuNPs in Milli-Q Water and Biobuffer

The absorption intensities of CTAB AuNPs in both Milli-Q water and biobuffer are very stable within the time of inspection. And their absorption peak positions were very stable too. These mean that CTAB AuNPs were very stable in both Milli-Q water and biobuffer.


### 3.1.2. CTAB AuNPs in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 Buffers

CTAB AuNPs behave similarly in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers. They showed a rapid drop in absorption intensities in the first 15 minutes and decreased slowly afterwards. Meanwhile, their absorption peak positions also demonstrated a blue shift in the first 15 minutes and remained unchanged up to 2 hours. Subsequently, their absorption intensities dropped to a few intensity percentages and no peaks can be observed at the third day. However, their absorption intensities increased again at the seventh day; this may be because the CTAB AuNPs form larger aggregates than those at the third day; therefore, scattering of the CTAB AuNPs increased. These represented that CTAB AuNPs are not stable in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers.To sum up, CTAB AuNPs were very stable in Milli-Q water and biobuffer; this indicated that they can be used for bioapplications. But they were unstable in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers.


## 3.1.1. CTAB AuNPs in Milli-Q Water and Biobuffer

The absorption intensities of CTAB AuNPs in both Milli-Q water and biobuffer are very stable within the time of inspection. And their absorption peak positions were very stable too. These mean that CTAB AuNPs were very stable in both Milli-Q water and biobuffer.


## 3.1.2. CTAB AuNPs in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 Buffers

CTAB AuNPs behave similarly in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers. They showed a rapid drop in absorption intensities in the first 15 minutes and decreased slowly afterwards. Meanwhile, their absorption peak positions also demonstrated a blue shift in the first 15 minutes and remained unchanged up to 2 hours. Subsequently, their absorption intensities dropped to a few intensity percentages and no peaks can be observed at the third day. However, their absorption intensities increased again at the seventh day; this may be because the CTAB AuNPs form larger aggregates than those at the third day; therefore, scattering of the CTAB AuNPs increased. These represented that CTAB AuNPs are not stable in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers.To sum up, CTAB AuNPs were very stable in Milli-Q water and biobuffer; this indicated that they can be used for bioapplications. But they were unstable in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers.


## 3.2. Stability of Citrate AuNPs in Different Media

Citrate has a shorter carbon length than CTAB. As there is no big difference in peak position, only the absorption peak intensity variation was shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Absorption peak intensity of citrate AuNPs in different media varies with time.


### 3.2.1. Citrate AuNPs in Milli-Q Water and Biobuffer

We can observe that the absorption peak intensities of citrate AuNPs in Milli-Q water and biobuffer were very stable within the period of inspection. And their absorption peak position in Milli-Q water and biobuffer was always the same in the experimental time. These represented that citrate AuNPs were very stable in Milli-Q water and biobuffer.


### 3.2.2. Citrate AuNPs in pH 4, pH 7, and pH 10 Buffers

Citrate AuNPs perform similarly in pH 4, pH 7, and pH 10 buffers. All of them showed fast drop in absorption peak intensity in the first 15 minutes and then dropped slowly thereafter. At the fourth day, they only have about 5% absorption peak intensity. Moreover, the absorption peak position of pH 4 buffer showed small red shift from 524 nm at 0 minutes to 533 nm at 2 hours which may be because of the increase in aggregate size and showed a large blue shift to 507 nm at the fourth day; this may be due to the degradation of citrate AuNPs which have a smaller size than their size at 0 minutes. But the absorption peak positions of citrate AuNPs in pH 7 and pH 10 buffers were almost the same within the first 2 hours and then no peaks can be found afterwards. These phenomena mean that citrate AuNPs are unstable in pH 4, pH 7, and pH 10 buffers.


### 3.2.3. Citrate AuNPs in pH 8 Buffer

The absorption peak intensity of citrate AuNPs in pH 8 buffer decreases slowly within the first 2 hours and then drops to about 40% intensity thereafter. And their absorption peak position was almost the same with the experimental time. Thus, they are unstable in pH 8 buffer in terms of absorption peak intensity.To sum up, citrate AuNPs were very stable in Milli-Q water and biobuffer which made them able to be used for bioapplications. But they were unstable in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers. Compared with the first absorption peak of CTAB AuNPs, both of them showed similar behavior for all buffers, that is, being unstable in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers but very stable in Milli-Q water and biobuffer, which allows them to be used for bioapplications.


## 3.2.1. Citrate AuNPs in Milli-Q Water and Biobuffer

We can observe that the absorption peak intensities of citrate AuNPs in Milli-Q water and biobuffer were very stable within the period of inspection. And their absorption peak position in Milli-Q water and biobuffer was always the same in the experimental time. These represented that citrate AuNPs were very stable in Milli-Q water and biobuffer.


## 3.2.2. Citrate AuNPs in pH 4, pH 7, and pH 10 Buffers

Citrate AuNPs perform similarly in pH 4, pH 7, and pH 10 buffers. All of them showed fast drop in absorption peak intensity in the first 15 minutes and then dropped slowly thereafter. At the fourth day, they only have about 5% absorption peak intensity. Moreover, the absorption peak position of pH 4 buffer showed small red shift from 524 nm at 0 minutes to 533 nm at 2 hours which may be because of the increase in aggregate size and showed a large blue shift to 507 nm at the fourth day; this may be due to the degradation of citrate AuNPs which have a smaller size than their size at 0 minutes. But the absorption peak positions of citrate AuNPs in pH 7 and pH 10 buffers were almost the same within the first 2 hours and then no peaks can be found afterwards. These phenomena mean that citrate AuNPs are unstable in pH 4, pH 7, and pH 10 buffers.


## 3.2.3. Citrate AuNPs in pH 8 Buffer

The absorption peak intensity of citrate AuNPs in pH 8 buffer decreases slowly within the first 2 hours and then drops to about 40% intensity thereafter. And their absorption peak position was almost the same with the experimental time. Thus, they are unstable in pH 8 buffer in terms of absorption peak intensity.To sum up, citrate AuNPs were very stable in Milli-Q water and biobuffer which made them able to be used for bioapplications. But they were unstable in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers. Compared with the first absorption peak of CTAB AuNPs, both of them showed similar behavior for all buffers, that is, being unstable in pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers but very stable in Milli-Q water and biobuffer, which allows them to be used for bioapplications.


## 3.3. Zeta Potential and Size of Citrate AuNPs

For the citrate AuNPs in Milli-Q water, referring to Table2, it is noted that the zeta potential is very good at 0 hours but decreased with time in the first 3 hours. At the same time, the color of the citrate AuNPs in the zeta cell for zeta potential measurement fades out after each measurement. This may be because in the measurement of zeta potential the citrate AuNPs adhere to the surface of the gold-plated electrodes.Table 2
Zeta potential and size of citrate AuNPs in Milli-Q water.
Time (hour)
Zeta potential (mV)
Zeta potential (mV)(second measure)
Size 1 (nm)
Size 2 (nm)
0
−27.5
—
5.6
50.8
1
−16.1
—
5.6
50.8
2
−19.0
—
5.6
50.8
3
−17.1
−32.2
5.6
50.8
24
−37.5
—
5.6
50.8
72
−33.4
—
5.6
50.8
168
−39.9
—
5.6
50.8
“—” means no measurement has been done.But if the citrate AuNPs in the zeta cell were replaced by the spare solution that has not been used for measurement before, a good zeta potential can be observed again, that is, zeta potential of second measurement of the 3 hours and measurement after 3 hours.And the size of the citrate AuNPs was the same for all time ranges. These were in good agreement with the absorption spectrum.From Table3, the zeta potential of the citrate AuNPs in pH 4 buffer was evenly more negative than that in Milli-Q water. But aggregation happened because some components in the buffer adsorb on the surface of the citrate AuNPs and crosslinks form in between AuNPs. These results agreed with the absorption spectrum.Table 3
Zeta potential and size of citrate AuNPs in pH 4 buffer.
Time (hour)
Zeta potential (mV)
Size (nm)
0
−46.1
342.0
1
−39.4
825.0
2
−38.8
531.2
3
−36.0
255.0
24
−33.0
295.3
72
−29.9
712.4
168
−13.9
141.8According to Table4, the zeta potential of citrate AuNPs in biobuffer was about 5 times lower than that in Milli-Q water at 0 hours. And size 1 was due to the biobuffer and size 2 was the size of the citrate AuNPs which was almost the same within the measurement period. As the zeta potential and size were stable with time, so it was in a good agreement with the absorption spectrum.Table 4
Zeta potential and size of citrate AuNPs in biobuffer.
Time (hour)
Zeta potential (mV)
Size 1 (nm)
Size 2 (nm)
0
−9.54
10.1
78.8
1
−10.6
5.6
122.4
2
−10.2
10.1
91.3
3
−10.5
10.1
78.8
24
−11.4
13.5
78.8
72
−11
11.7
78.8
168
−10.6
10.1
78.8To sum up, the zeta potentials of citrate AuNPs in Milli-Q water and biobuffer were very stable while those in pH 4 buffer were decreasing during the experiment. Moreover, their size in Milli-Q water and biobuffer was also stable for all times within the experimental period while they showed aggregation in pH 4 buffer.


## 3.4. Application for the Rice Growth

As citrate AuNPs were rather stable in water and biobuffer, they were used in the application for the rice growth.From Figure4 and Table 5 we can observe that with the AuNPs in a rather low concentration the rice roots stopped growing and the height of seedlings got influenced too; however the presence of AuNPs did not inhibit the germination of rice seed.Table 5
The height, number, and length for rice.
The height of seedlings
The number of roots
The length of roots
The ratio of root length and seedling height
CK
17.78 ± 1.82 Aa
7.50 ± 1.80 Aa
3.39 ± 1.35 Aa
0.191 Aa
T1
10.79 ± 3.03 Bb
6.90 ± 1.29 Aa
1.90 ± 0.74 Bb
0.176 Bb
T2
11.60 ± 0.15 Bb
7.30 ± 1.42 Aa
1.67 ± 0.50 Bb
0.144 Bb
Aa Bb are Significant symbols which commonly used in the Data Analysis. Use the uppercase and lowercase letters (A a) due to the significant results.Figure 4
Images of rice: no gold nanoparticles,5*10-6 M gold nanoparticles, and 5*10-8 M gold nanoparticles.


## 4. Conclusions

In Milli-Q water, both AuNPs are very stable. In pH 4, pH 7, pH 8, and pH 10 buffers, both of them are unstable. In biobuffer, they were very stable which indicated that both CTAB and citrate AuNPs can be used for bioapplications.To conclude, we found important information for the practical use of nanoparticles in bioapplications. Both CTAB and citrate AuNPs are also very good for bioapplications. And citrate AuNPs can inhibit the elongation of rice root to a large degree without inhibiting the germination of rice seed.



---

*Source: 451232-2014-09-02.xml*