# Synthesis and Application of Nanocrystalline-Cellulose-Supported Acid Ionic Liquid Catalyst in Pechmann Reaction

Authors: Moslem Mansour Lakouraj; Nazanin Bagheri; Vahid Hasantabar
Journal: International Journal of Carbohydrate Chemistry
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Nanocrystalline-cellulose-supported acidic ionic liquid carrying SO3H functional group was prepared using nanocrystalline cellulose, imidazole and 1,4-butane sultone as the source chemicals. The prepared nanocrystalline-cellulose-supported ionic liquid catalyst was characterized by AFM and SEM and its catalytic activity in the reaction of resorcinol with ethyl acetoacetate was tested in a solvent-free condition. The effects of reaction time, reaction temperature, and the ratio of catalyst on the conversion of resorcinol were investigated. A variety of coumarin derivatives were obtained in good yield in the absence of solvent.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Coumarins are very significant heterocyclic compounds in organic synthesis. These compounds are known as benzo-2-pyrone derivatives which are principally found in plants. Most of coumarin derivatives show some useful bioactivities. These compounds are widely used for pharmaceutical and agricultural applications and fragrance [1]. The Pechmann reaction is one of the most valuable methods for synthesis of coumarin which starts by phenols and acidic catalysts like concentrated sulfuric acid and Bronsted acidic ionic liquid [2]. Moreover, some other harsh catalysts used in the Pechmann reaction are InCl3, ZrCl4, Yb(OTF)3, and p-TSOH [3]. These methods have some disadvantages such as by-products formation, long reaction time, and corrosion problems. So, there have been some attempts to find optional and safe synthetic routes [4]. However, most of these methods also suffer from problematic conditions such as expensive reagent, durable workup, large amount of support, or a catalyst which makes large amount of toxic waste. Therefore, with considering these problems, we tried to introduce a new ecofriendly catalyst to promote the Pechmann reaction. Obviously, heterogeneous catalysts such as solid phase supported catalysts are particularly attractive for synthesis of chemical compounds because they allow simple separation of catalyst from the reaction mixture and prevent the release of toxic material to the environment. In recent years science of catalysts is shifting to reusable resources and ecofriendly processes. Thus, biodegradable and biocompatible polymers are appropriate alternatives in serving on the catalytic field [5, 6].Among the biopolymers, cellulose and its derivatives are extensively used in chemicals and bioapplications. They are also applied as support for synthesis of organic compounds because cellulose and its derivatives are biodegradable, environmentally safe, widely abundant in nature, and easy to handle.On the other hand, because of the unique physical and chemical properties of nanoscale materials especially in catalytic reactions, synthesis and application of nanostructured materials are an important field in nanoscience and technology. Through these, nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) has attracted a great deal of interest in the nanocomposite field due to its intensive properties such as nanosize dimension, high surface area, and unique morphology [7]. Extensive researches have showed that NCC can be used for many application such as pharmaceutical, optical, and nanocomposite materials [8–10].Therefore, in this project, we have prepared and applied nanocrystalline-cellulose-supported sulfonic acid ionic liquid as a highly efficient catalyst in promotion of the Pechmann reaction for convenient synthesis of coumarins in solvent free conditions.


## 2. Materials and Methods

Chemicals were purchased from Merck and Fluka chemical companies.1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance DRX 400 MHz spectrometer. IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker FTIR spectrometer. Melting points were measured on an Electrothermal 9100 apparatus. Characterization of cellulose whiskers was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (XL30, Philips, the Netherlands) at 30 kV and atomic force microscopy (AFM) Nanosurf Easy Scan 2 Flex AFM (tapping mode).


### 2.1. Preparation of Nanocrystalline Cellulose (NCC)

NCC suspension was produced according to the already reported procedure with slight modification [11]. Microcrystalline cellulose powder (1.0 g) was hydrolyzed by sulfuric acid (8.75 mL, 64% w/v) for 4 h at 50°C with continuous stirring. The hydrolysis was quenched by adding an excess amount of distilled water (50 mL) to the reaction mixture. The resulting mixture was centrifuged at 3,500 rpm for 30 min. After decanting, water (50 mL) was added to the precipitate and the mixture was then sonicated for 5 min to form a new suspension. This centrifugation/sonication process was repeated six times.


### 2.2.  Preparation of Catalyst Glycidyl Ether of the Nanocrystalline Cellulose

In a round-bottom flask equipped with condenser, 1 N NaOH (2 mL) was added to a suspension of prepared NCC (2 g). The system was homogenized for 10 min on an ice bath (T≤5°C). For the synthesis of epoxidized nanocrystalline cellulose, the excess amount of epichlorohydrin (6 mL) was added in stepwise manner and homogenization continued for another 15 min. The obtained milky solution was then heated gradually to 60–65°C for 2.5 h. The mixture was then neutralized with distilled water and washed twice with 10 mL of a solution of acetone : water (85 : 15) and finally twice more with 20 mL of acetone. The resulting solid was separated by simple filtration and dried overnight at room temperature.IR (KBr): 989, 1060, 2881, 2995, 3388 cm−1.


### 2.3. Ring Opening of Epoxidized Nanocrystalline Cellulose with Imidazole

A mixture of imidazole (0.34 g), epoxidized nanocrystalline cellulose (0.9 g), and THF (2 mL) was placed in a round-bottom flask and stirred magnetically for 12 h at 60°C. The resulting mixture was separated by simple filtration and washed with THF which afforded 1.2 g of imidazole functionalized NCC.IR (KBr): 1100, 1160, 1370, 1634, 2920, 3352 cm−1.Elemental analysis: found; C (41.91%), H (4.45%), N (10.47%); calculated (based on monofunctionalized glucopyranose repeating units of cellulose); C (59.87%), H (6.4%), N (17.46%).


### 2.4. Synthesis of NCC-Supported Ionic Liquid

SO3H-functionalized Bronsted acidic ionic liquid was prepared in the laboratory according to the procedure outlined in the literature [12, 13]. In a typical preparation procedure, the imidazole functionalized NCC (0.5 g) was mixed with 1,4-butane sultone (0.31 g) while being stirred at 40°C for 12 h. After completion, the zwitterions mass was washed three times with diethyl ether and then dried under vacuum (120°C, 0.01 Torr). A stoichiometric amount of sulfuric acid was then added to the zwitterionic precipitate. The mixture was stirred at 50°C for 8 h to obtain the supported ionic liquid. The structures of the prepared supported ionic liquid are shown in Scheme 1.Scheme 1
The Pechmann reaction.IR (KBr): 1040, 1180, 1349, 1450, 1632, 2900, 3320 cm−1.


### 2.5. Typical Procedure for Synthesis of Coumarins

In a typical experiment, nanocrystalline-cellulose-supported acidic ionic liquid which was prepared based on some literature (Scheme1) [11–13] (0.02 g) was mixed in a mixture of resorcinol (1.5 mmol) and ethyl acetoacetate (1.5 mmol) in a 25 mL round-bottom flask equipped with a distillation condenser. The content was stirred vigorously for the desired time at 80°C. The reaction progress was monitored by TLC using n-hexane : ethyl acetate, 3 : 1, as eluent. On completion, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature. The liquid mixture solidified at ambient temperature. Ethanol (10 mL) was added and heated at 50°C until complete dissolution of the solid. Then the mixture was filtered to separate the catalyst. The solution was poured in a 100 mL beaker containing a lot of water. Crystalline product was collected by filtration to give 7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin in 95% yield. The crude crystal was recrystallized from EtOH to give pure 7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin [14].


### 2.6. Spectral Data for Coumarins

Entry 1: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.42 (d, 3H), 6.32 (q, 1H), 7.15–7.42 (m, 3H), 7.48 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.1, 116, 117.9, 122, 124.1, 124.6, 132.6, 153, 154.5, 161.6.IR (KBr): 1064, 1238, 1543, 1705, 3020 cm−1.Entry 2:1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.35 (d, 3H), 6.11 (q, 1H), 6.69 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (dd, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 10.52 (s, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.56, 102.62, 110.70, 112.47, 113.29, 127.05, 153.97, 155.28, 160.74, 161.60.IR (KBr): 1060, 1225, 1590, 1680, 3100 cm−1.Entry 3: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.42 (d, 3H), 6.33 (q, 1H), 6.73 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (s, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.38, 109.40, 114.40, 117.50, 120.65, 121.54, 147.10, 153.93, 155.10, 159.70.IR (KBr): 1055, 1225, 1565, 1693, 3010, 3412 cm−1.Entry 4: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.10 (s, 3H), 2.31 (d, 3H), 4.17 (s, 1H), 6.71–7.29 (m, 3H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.04, 24.17, 110.70, 117.43, 118.20, 124.10, 126.50, 144.50, 152.74, 153.92, 162.10.IR (KBr): 1070, 1146, 1212, 1248, 1378, 1579, 1636, 1704, 2920, 2970 cm−1.Entry 5: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 2.40 (d, 3H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 6.21 (q, 1H), 6.95 (d, 1H), 6.98 (q, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 18.60, 56.37, 101.17, 111.58, 112.58, 113.57, 126.93, 153.93, 155.24, 160.63, 162.84.IR (KBr): 1068, 1284, 1510, 1725, 2927, 3070 cm−1.Entry 6: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.34 (d, 3H), 6.13 (q, 1H), 6.63 (s, 1H), 6.65 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.40, 101.57, 109.40, 111.58, 114.57, 123.46, 153.17, 154.41, 154.63, 162.84.IR (KBr): 1052, 1238, 1570, 1688, 3012, 3312, 3468 cm−1.Entry 7: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 2.35 (d, 3H), 6.12 (q, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 9.67 (s, 1H), 10.04 (s, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 18.72, 110.64, 112.56, 113.21, 115.95, 132.61, 143.74, 149.87, 154.41, 160.68.IR (KBr): 629, 807, 1006, 1064, 1186, 1337, 1480, 1524, 1653, 2925, 3217 cm−1.Entry 8: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 2.53 (d, 3H), 6.50 (q, 1H), 7.68–7.74 (m, 2H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.02–8.06 (m, 1H), 8.34–8.37 (m, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 19.14, 114.34, 115.58, 121.74, 122.10, 122.66, 124.44, 127.86, 128.44, 129.12, 134.83, 150.13, 154.70, 160.13.IR (KBr) 1044, 1275, 1572, 1750, 2922, 3012 cm−1.Entry 9: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.45 (d, 3H), 6.32 (q, 1H), 7.32–7.60 (m, 4H), 7.9 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.54 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 24.40, 109.47, 115.70, 117.76, 123.60, 126.35, 126.53, 128.91, 129.84, 134.58, 153.40, 154.90, 160.30.IR (KBr) 1044, 1215, 1514, 1630, 3052 cm−1.Entry 11: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 2.46 (d, 3H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 5.98 (q, J=1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.46 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.54 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 24.05, 56.31, 56.65, 94.01, 95.99, 104.35, 111.08, 154.63, 156.79, 159.43, 160.15, 163.14.IR (KBr): 1130, 1353, 1460, 1616, 1733, 2939, 2992, 3024 cm−1.


## 2.1. Preparation of Nanocrystalline Cellulose (NCC)

NCC suspension was produced according to the already reported procedure with slight modification [11]. Microcrystalline cellulose powder (1.0 g) was hydrolyzed by sulfuric acid (8.75 mL, 64% w/v) for 4 h at 50°C with continuous stirring. The hydrolysis was quenched by adding an excess amount of distilled water (50 mL) to the reaction mixture. The resulting mixture was centrifuged at 3,500 rpm for 30 min. After decanting, water (50 mL) was added to the precipitate and the mixture was then sonicated for 5 min to form a new suspension. This centrifugation/sonication process was repeated six times.


## 2.2.  Preparation of Catalyst Glycidyl Ether of the Nanocrystalline Cellulose

In a round-bottom flask equipped with condenser, 1 N NaOH (2 mL) was added to a suspension of prepared NCC (2 g). The system was homogenized for 10 min on an ice bath (T≤5°C). For the synthesis of epoxidized nanocrystalline cellulose, the excess amount of epichlorohydrin (6 mL) was added in stepwise manner and homogenization continued for another 15 min. The obtained milky solution was then heated gradually to 60–65°C for 2.5 h. The mixture was then neutralized with distilled water and washed twice with 10 mL of a solution of acetone : water (85 : 15) and finally twice more with 20 mL of acetone. The resulting solid was separated by simple filtration and dried overnight at room temperature.IR (KBr): 989, 1060, 2881, 2995, 3388 cm−1.


## 2.3. Ring Opening of Epoxidized Nanocrystalline Cellulose with Imidazole

A mixture of imidazole (0.34 g), epoxidized nanocrystalline cellulose (0.9 g), and THF (2 mL) was placed in a round-bottom flask and stirred magnetically for 12 h at 60°C. The resulting mixture was separated by simple filtration and washed with THF which afforded 1.2 g of imidazole functionalized NCC.IR (KBr): 1100, 1160, 1370, 1634, 2920, 3352 cm−1.Elemental analysis: found; C (41.91%), H (4.45%), N (10.47%); calculated (based on monofunctionalized glucopyranose repeating units of cellulose); C (59.87%), H (6.4%), N (17.46%).


## 2.4. Synthesis of NCC-Supported Ionic Liquid

SO3H-functionalized Bronsted acidic ionic liquid was prepared in the laboratory according to the procedure outlined in the literature [12, 13]. In a typical preparation procedure, the imidazole functionalized NCC (0.5 g) was mixed with 1,4-butane sultone (0.31 g) while being stirred at 40°C for 12 h. After completion, the zwitterions mass was washed three times with diethyl ether and then dried under vacuum (120°C, 0.01 Torr). A stoichiometric amount of sulfuric acid was then added to the zwitterionic precipitate. The mixture was stirred at 50°C for 8 h to obtain the supported ionic liquid. The structures of the prepared supported ionic liquid are shown in Scheme 1.Scheme 1
The Pechmann reaction.IR (KBr): 1040, 1180, 1349, 1450, 1632, 2900, 3320 cm−1.


## 2.5. Typical Procedure for Synthesis of Coumarins

In a typical experiment, nanocrystalline-cellulose-supported acidic ionic liquid which was prepared based on some literature (Scheme1) [11–13] (0.02 g) was mixed in a mixture of resorcinol (1.5 mmol) and ethyl acetoacetate (1.5 mmol) in a 25 mL round-bottom flask equipped with a distillation condenser. The content was stirred vigorously for the desired time at 80°C. The reaction progress was monitored by TLC using n-hexane : ethyl acetate, 3 : 1, as eluent. On completion, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature. The liquid mixture solidified at ambient temperature. Ethanol (10 mL) was added and heated at 50°C until complete dissolution of the solid. Then the mixture was filtered to separate the catalyst. The solution was poured in a 100 mL beaker containing a lot of water. Crystalline product was collected by filtration to give 7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin in 95% yield. The crude crystal was recrystallized from EtOH to give pure 7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin [14].


## 2.6. Spectral Data for Coumarins

Entry 1: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.42 (d, 3H), 6.32 (q, 1H), 7.15–7.42 (m, 3H), 7.48 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.1, 116, 117.9, 122, 124.1, 124.6, 132.6, 153, 154.5, 161.6.IR (KBr): 1064, 1238, 1543, 1705, 3020 cm−1.Entry 2:1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.35 (d, 3H), 6.11 (q, 1H), 6.69 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (dd, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 10.52 (s, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.56, 102.62, 110.70, 112.47, 113.29, 127.05, 153.97, 155.28, 160.74, 161.60.IR (KBr): 1060, 1225, 1590, 1680, 3100 cm−1.Entry 3: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.42 (d, 3H), 6.33 (q, 1H), 6.73 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (s, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.38, 109.40, 114.40, 117.50, 120.65, 121.54, 147.10, 153.93, 155.10, 159.70.IR (KBr): 1055, 1225, 1565, 1693, 3010, 3412 cm−1.Entry 4: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.10 (s, 3H), 2.31 (d, 3H), 4.17 (s, 1H), 6.71–7.29 (m, 3H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.04, 24.17, 110.70, 117.43, 118.20, 124.10, 126.50, 144.50, 152.74, 153.92, 162.10.IR (KBr): 1070, 1146, 1212, 1248, 1378, 1579, 1636, 1704, 2920, 2970 cm−1.Entry 5: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 2.40 (d, 3H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 6.21 (q, 1H), 6.95 (d, 1H), 6.98 (q, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 18.60, 56.37, 101.17, 111.58, 112.58, 113.57, 126.93, 153.93, 155.24, 160.63, 162.84.IR (KBr): 1068, 1284, 1510, 1725, 2927, 3070 cm−1.Entry 6: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.34 (d, 3H), 6.13 (q, 1H), 6.63 (s, 1H), 6.65 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.40, 101.57, 109.40, 111.58, 114.57, 123.46, 153.17, 154.41, 154.63, 162.84.IR (KBr): 1052, 1238, 1570, 1688, 3012, 3312, 3468 cm−1.Entry 7: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 2.35 (d, 3H), 6.12 (q, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 9.67 (s, 1H), 10.04 (s, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 18.72, 110.64, 112.56, 113.21, 115.95, 132.61, 143.74, 149.87, 154.41, 160.68.IR (KBr): 629, 807, 1006, 1064, 1186, 1337, 1480, 1524, 1653, 2925, 3217 cm−1.Entry 8: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 2.53 (d, 3H), 6.50 (q, 1H), 7.68–7.74 (m, 2H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.02–8.06 (m, 1H), 8.34–8.37 (m, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 19.14, 114.34, 115.58, 121.74, 122.10, 122.66, 124.44, 127.86, 128.44, 129.12, 134.83, 150.13, 154.70, 160.13.IR (KBr) 1044, 1275, 1572, 1750, 2922, 3012 cm−1.Entry 9: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.45 (d, 3H), 6.32 (q, 1H), 7.32–7.60 (m, 4H), 7.9 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.54 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 24.40, 109.47, 115.70, 117.76, 123.60, 126.35, 126.53, 128.91, 129.84, 134.58, 153.40, 154.90, 160.30.IR (KBr) 1044, 1215, 1514, 1630, 3052 cm−1.Entry 11: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 2.46 (d, 3H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 5.98 (q, J=1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.46 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.54 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H).13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 24.05, 56.31, 56.65, 94.01, 95.99, 104.35, 111.08, 154.63, 156.79, 159.43, 160.15, 163.14.IR (KBr): 1130, 1353, 1460, 1616, 1733, 2939, 2992, 3024 cm−1.


## 3. Results and Discussion

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) is a useful technique for studying polysaccharides chemistry. Therefore, FT-IR analysis was performed to investigate the functionalization reaction. The spectrum of cellulose is well known in the literature which shows the characteristic vibrational bands including strong broad OH stretching (3300–4000 cm−1), C–H stretching of methine and methylene groups (2800–3000 cm−1), and the alcoholic C–O and glycosidic bond vibrations around 1100–1150 cm−1 [19, 20].As seen in Figure1, the spectra of both functionalized NCC showed the C–C ring breathing band at ~1040–1100 cm−1 and the C–O–C glycosidic ether band at ~1150 cm−1 which arose from the cellulose segment. The presence of the stretching vibrations at ~2800 and 2900 cm−1 also indicated the methine and methylene content of the substituted NCC. No noticeable differences were observed between the spectra of epoxidized cellulose (as seen in Figure 1(a)) and that of original cellulose, demonstrating that the glucopyranoside rings were preserved during the functionalization reaction.Figure 1
(a) Epoxidized NCC, (b) imidazole-NCC, and (c) NCC-supported ionic liquid.Comparison of IR spectra of imidazole-containing NCC (Figure1(b)) with that of epoxidized NCC (Figure 1(a)) basically revealed that the vibrational frequency at 2995 cm−1 corresponding to the C–H of the epoxide ring disappeared and new submerged bands were appeared about 1510 and 1634 cm−1 (aromatic skeletal stretching and N–H bending vibrations) and 1050–1200 cm−1 corresponding to C–N vibrations.In Figure1(c), a strong vibrational band at 1349 cm−1 and a sharp peak at 1180 cm−1 together with a strong broad band of the acid functionality around 2500–3500 cm−1 approved the presence of sulfonic acid group on the catalyst. Summing up, these observations confirmed the successful formation of the functionalized sulfonic acid supported by NCC.Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals was also performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The size distribution of the cellulose nanocrystals was determined by AFM. It has been widely used to provide valuable and rapid indication of surface topography of NCC under ambient conditions.Figures2(a)–2(c) show the AFM which was obtained from dilute suspension of the cellulose nanocrystals. According to the AFM images, Figure 2(b) shows that the average and maximum height of NCC maintained diameters less than 50 nm.Atomic force microscope (AFM) image of NCC.
(a)
(b)
(c)Morphology of this nanocomposite was studied with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). A representative SEM image of the cellulose-nanocrystals-supported ionic liquid is shown in Figure3. It was clearly observed that the composite was in nanodimension size (about 48 nm).Figure 3
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of nanocrystalline-cellulose-supported ionic liquid.Chemically, coumarins can be synthesized by a range of methods such as the Perkin, Pechmann reaction, Knoevenagel condensation, Reformatsky, Wittig, and catalytic cyclization reactions [21–29]. Acid catalyzed Pechmann reaction is the simple and normally used method for synthesizing coumarins from activated phenols, mainly metasubstituted phenols containing nucleophilic substituent at meta-position.We herein report an ecofriendly, facile, and efficient methodology for the synthesis of 4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-ones using a nanosized acidic catalyst. This method involves the convenient synthesis of substituted coumarins by treatment of ethyl acetoacetate and substituted phenol using NCC supported sulfonic acid ionic liquid as an environmentally safe and efficient nanocomposite in catalytic amount to promote the reaction under solvent-free condition at 80°C (Scheme2).Scheme 2
Preparation of catalyst.To establish the optimum condition on this reaction, first of all, various amounts of catalyst were examined using ethyl acetoacetate and resorcinol as model compounds. The effect of ratio of catalyst on resorcinol conversion and product selectivity was studied at 80°C using 5 to 20% of the catalyst while keeping the ethyl acetoacetate/resorcinol molar ratio at 1 : 1 (Table1).Table 1
Effect of catalyst ratio on Pechmann reaction.
Entry
Catalysta
Time (min)
Yieldb (%)
1
5%
37
90
2
10%
20
95
3
15%
12
90
4
20%
20
85
aWeight percentage of catalyst. bYield refers to isolate products.The excellent yield was obtained with 10% of the catalyst. Next, to find the best solvent, the reaction of ethylacetoacetate and resorcinol using 10% of catalyst was monitored at 80°C in different solvents, namely, n-Hexane, THF, CH2Cl2, and CH3CN, and also in solvent-free condition. The results are summarized in Table 2.Table 2
Effect of solvent on condensation of ethyl acetoacetate with resorcinol.
Entry
Solvent
Time (min)
Yield (%)
1
Solvent free
20
95
2
THF
30
90
3
CH3CN
35
95
4
CH2Cl2
12
95
5
n-Hexane
20
90It was found that solvent-free condition stands out as the choice, with its fast conversion, high yield, and no side product, such as chromones formation [30, 31].And finally the influence of reaction temperature on conversion of resorcinol was investigated. The reaction was studied at various temperatures from room temperature up to 100°C and the results were summarized in Table3 for 1 : 1 molar ratio of resorcinol/ethyl acetoacetate. Upon increasing the reaction temperature, the conversion of resorcinol and yield of coumarin increased rapidly and reached an equilibrium level up to 80°C and remained almost constant thereafter.Table 3
Effect of reaction temperature on resorcinol conversion.
Entry
Temperature (°C)
Time
Yield (%)
1
r.t
24 (h)
92
2
50
5 (h)
89
3
70
35 (min)
80
4
80
20 (min)
95
5
100
18 (min)
80Using optimized reaction parameters, a variety of 4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-ones were synthesized from ethyl acetoacetate and corresponding phenols (Table4). In summary, a novel approach for the synthesis of 4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-ones has been explored by using nanocrystalline-cellulose-supported sulfonic acid ionic liquid in solvent-free condition, which showed advantages leading to an effective and attractive process for the preparation of coumarins. Results showed that in the presence of stronger electron donating groups on phenolic reactants the rate and yield of reaction will be enhanced significantly due to the positive electronic effect of the substituents. In the case of β-naphthol (entry 9), the steric hindrance of hydrogen atom at 8-position inhibits the cyclization reaction, while α-naphthol reacts more easily to produce the corresponding coumarin (Scheme 3).Table 4
Preparation of coumarins using NCC-supported sulfonic acid ionic liquida.
Entry
Reactant
Product
Time
Yield (%)b
m.p (°C)
Lit.c
1
24 (h)
trace
77–79
79–81 [15]
2
20 (min)
95
185
182–184 [14]
3
6.5 (h)
60
244
241-242 [15]
4
6 (h)
20
130–132
130-131 [16]
5
5 (h)
80
161-162
158–160 [14]
6
1.5 (h)
75
221–224
220–224 [17]
7
20 (min)
85
230–233
234-235 [14]
8
5 (h)
94
154–156
153–155 [14]
9
10 (h)
40
180–182
182-183 [18]
10
24 (h)
N.R
—
—
11
18 (min)
98
172–175
170–172 [16]
aThe reactions were performed in the absence of solvent at 80°C. bIsolated yields. cThe products were characterized by comparison of their spectroscopic and physical data with reference samples synthesized by the reported procedure.Scheme 3
Proposed mechanistic pathway for naphthols.


## 4. Conclusion

The reaction condition is relatively mild and workup procedure is simple. The catalyst was separated by filtration and after washing with petroleum ether reused for the new experiments. The reaction conversion for the model reaction after 3 times recycling and reuse of the catalyst gradually reduced to 68%. In conclusion, we have found that NCC-supported acidic ionic liquid is an efficient catalyst for solid phase synthesis of coumarins via the Pechmann reaction. The significant features of the method are (a) operation simplicity, (b) mild reaction condition, and (c) use of an environmentally benign and reusable catalyst.



---

*Source: 452580-2013-10-29.xml*