# Influence of Flax Fibre Hybridization on Mechanical Behaviour of Sisal Fibre-Polypropylene Composites Prepared with an Injection Moulding Machine

Authors: J. Allen Jeffrey; A. Sivakumar; R. Naveen Kumar; A. Anbazhagan; G. Manojkumar; Sami Al Obaid; Saleh Alfarraj; S. Sivakumar; S. Rajkumar
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Due to their low weight, high specific strength, and low environmental impact, sisal fibre-polypropylene composites have gained popularity. However, the material has a low modulus and poor moisture resistance, among other shortcomings. This study investigated how flax fibre hybridization affects the physical parameters of sisal fibre-polypropylene composites. We used maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene to improve compatibility between fibres and polypropylene. Adding flax fibres to polypropylene-silica composites resulted in increased tensile strength, flexibility, and impact strength, according to researchers. Water resistance was further improved by adding flax fibres. Tensile strength values of polypropylene-sisal fibre composites filled with 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt% of flax fibres were 29.46, 30.56, 31.57, 33.12, and 34.64 MPa, respectively.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent years, researchers have shifted their attention to developing pollution-free green composites that can replace polymer materials in commercial applications. In the development of natural composites, environmental resources have been used as reinforcement materials [1]. Organic fibre composite materials are used in the automobile and furniture industries. At present, coir, jute, and flax are the three most important organic fibres. They are also biodegradable [2]. Biodegradability and renewability of natural fibres make them effective reinforcement materials for composites [3]. Due to the availability of biocomposites, their use has skyrocketed across a variety of industries. Due to the scarcity of synthetic and traditional materials, most material science research focuses on biomaterials. Biocomposites have been studied by a number of academicians. These particles show superior hardness when mixed with epoxy resin matrix and banana fibre composites [4]. Due to their reduced compatibility with hydrophobic polymer matrixes, hydrophilicity is a disadvantage for natural fibres [5–9]. In composites with lignocellulosic fibres and polymeric matrix, such as polypropylene (PP), low levels of dispersion and adhesion occur [10]. Using acid compounds, organosilanes, or alkali treatments, fibre surfaces can be altered to adhere to each other. It has been demonstrated that the maleic anhydride-polypropylene copolymer is a very effective lignocellulosic fibre/PP composite compatibilizer [11–15]. In temperate and subtropical climates, flax fibres are formed in the inner bark of the stem. Flax fibre is a cellulosic, multicellular bast fibre composed of natural materials like wood and cellulose. Flax fibres range from 10 to 100 centimetres in length. They have a 35–90 m diameter range. Because their polymers are almost perpendicular to the fibre axis, flax is more durable than cotton. Flax is an ancient textile material. Linen is the fabric name given to flax, the plant that is used to produce it. Several studies have compared the mechanical properties of natural fibre/organic matrix composites after similar treatments [16–19]. Fibre-reinforced composites made of natural fibres have a lower modulus and strength than those made of glass fibres and are less resistant to moisture. Two or more fibre types in a single matrix can improve a composite’s mechanical performance [13, 15, 20]. Hybrid composites provide a wide range of material properties in the end. As a result, one type of fibre can compensate for the shortcomings of the other [21–25]. Using a combination of glass and natural fibres, we create hybrid composites that offer superior mechanical performance and environmental benefits. An effective material design could achieve a balance between performance and environmental benefits [26]. As a coupling agent, the maleic anhydride-polypropylene copolymer improved the mechanical properties of flax fibre-PP composites [27]. A flax-sisal fibre/polypropylene composite was examined for its mechanical properties. The mechanical and water absorption properties of these composite materials were compared with those of flax fibre-added composites [28–30]. In addition to impact strength, we compared sisal/flax blend strength, Young’s modulus, flexural strength, and flexibility modulus. Flax fibre/polypropylene matrix composites and hybrid composites were also evaluated for their water absorption capacities. Figure 1 reveals the challenges and technical problems faced during fabrication of natural fibre composites.Figure 1
Challenges and technical problems faced during fabrication of natural fibre composites.


## 2. Experimental Arrangements

### 2.1. Materials

Shine Polymers & Trading provided polypropylene. Crystal Fiber Products supplied the sisal fibres. Bharatiya Natural Fibres provided flax fibres in roving shape. The sisal and flax fibres had densities of 1.39 and 2.41 g/cm3, respectively. Super Chemical Traders supplied polypropylene grafted with maleic anhydride, which was used as a compatibilizer.


### 2.2. Sisal Fibres

1.45 grams per cubic centimetre of real density and 1.20 grams per cubic centimetre of apparent density have been observed in this material. At 65% relative humidity, moisture regain capacity is 11%, while at 100% RH, moisture regain capacity is 32%. The fibre has a moderate crystalline structure. Around the fibre axis, the spiral angle is 20–25°. 9.7% elastic strain is found in sisal fibres with a diameter of 21.5103 cm. Transverse compression of these fibres is higher than longitudinal compression. Lignin in sisal fibres causes them to fade rapidly when exposed to sunlight. The moisture reabsorption value of these fibres is affected by their swelling. Despite their low porosity, plant fibres with high moisture absorption swelling do not show much change in porosity. This indicates a less organised molecular arrangement in indirectly dried fibres. The chemical, physical, and mechanical composition of sisal fibres is shown in Table1.Table 1
Chemical, physical, and mechanical composition of sisal fibres.
IngredientsSisal fibres (%)Cellulose41.6–62.6Hemicellulose9.2–14.6Lignin11.4–19.5Density (g/cm3)1.28–1.42Tensile strength (MPa)126–860Tensile modulus (GPa)4.6–16.8Elongation (%)1.54–3.85Fibre diameter (µm)145–440


### 2.3. Flax Fibres

They range from 25 to 150“millimetres in length and have a diameter of 12 to 16”micrometres. Shorter tow fibres are used for coarser fabrics, while longer line fibres are used for refined fabrics. The flexibility and texture of the fabric are enhanced by flax fibre’s “nodes.” Flax fibres have irregular polygonal cross sections, which contribute to the fabric’s abrasive surface. The chemical composition of flax fibres is given in Table2.Table 2
Chemical composition of flax fibres.
IngredientsRaw flax%Retted flax%Cellulose56.564.1Hemicellulose15.416.7Pectin3.81.8Lignin2.52.0Fat and wax1.31.5Water solubility10.53.9Moisture regain capacity (water)10.010.0Total100%100%


### 2.4. Preparation of Fibres

Sisal and flax fibres of five millimetres were cut. A total of three hours of cooking in a methanol/benzene mixture was required to remove waxes and low-molecular-weight species from the fibres before further processing. Hemicellulose was removed from the fibres by soaking them in a 3% NaOH solution for three hours before washing. In the following days, we rinsed and dried the fibres at 90°C over the course of 24 hours.


### 2.5. Composite Preparation

In a vacuum oven set at 150°C for 14 hours, the fibres were dried before being mixed. Chemical treatments and compounding processes were used to determine the mechanical properties of flax and sisal fibre blends. Ingredients were mixed in an internal mixer and extruded using a twin screw extruder to create the final product. In the internal mixer, they were all mixed for 15 minutes at 60 rpm and 190°C after they were loaded. A speed of 60 rpm was set to run the twin screw extruder (rpm). The first zone was set at 170°C, the second at 180°C, the third at 185°C, and the fourth at 190°C (at die). Figure2 depicts the twin screw extrusion process in schematic form.Figure 2
Schematic of the twin screw extrusion process.A 12-hour vacuum oven at 120°C was used for both mixing procedures. Using an injection moulding machine, the pellets were injected in dry form. Plastic pellets were injected directly into the injection moulding machine as a comparison. As shown in Figure3, the injection moulding process follows a flow chart. The ASTM D5943, ASTM D638, ASTM D256, and ASTM D570 standards were followed in the moulding of the samples. The true fibre content of composites was determined using xylene. In an oven, the recovered fibres were dried and weighed after the matrix had been dissolved and removed. Table 3 shows the different composite compositions and their descriptions.Figure 3
Schematic of the injection moulding process.Table 3
Detailed description of the composite specimens and its compositions.
Description of the composite specimenPolypropylene (PP) (wt%)Sisal fibres (wt%)Flax fibres (wt%)PP10000PP/SF70300PP/FF70030PP/25SF/5FF702505PP/20SF/10FF702010PP/15SF/15FF701515PP/10SF/20FF701020


### 2.6. Characterizations

#### 2.6.1. Measurement of Fibre Length

The composites were heated in a furnace for 4 hours at 500°C to eliminate short glass fibres. The length of the fibres was determined using a reflectance light microscope on 200 samples.


#### 2.6.2. Evaluation of Mechanical Properties

The speed of the Universal Testing Machine was set at five millimetres per second during the testing. ASTM D256-compliant impact tests were performed on Izods that had been notched. A hammer used to test the composite’s impact characteristics weighed 25 kg. The crosshead speed on an ASTM D5943-compliant Universal Testing Machine was 5 mm/s. Figure4 reveals the impact test specimen position.Figure 4
Impact test specimen position.


### 2.7. Water Absorption Properties

According to ASTM D570, PP and fibre composites were tested for water absorption. During this experiment, five samples were submerged in distilled water (2 days). The water absorption rate formula is given as follows:(1)percentageofwaterabsorption=SW2−SW1SW1×100,where SW1 = specimen weight before the test (grams) and SW2 = specimen weight after the test (grams).


## 2.1. Materials

Shine Polymers & Trading provided polypropylene. Crystal Fiber Products supplied the sisal fibres. Bharatiya Natural Fibres provided flax fibres in roving shape. The sisal and flax fibres had densities of 1.39 and 2.41 g/cm3, respectively. Super Chemical Traders supplied polypropylene grafted with maleic anhydride, which was used as a compatibilizer.


## 2.2. Sisal Fibres

1.45 grams per cubic centimetre of real density and 1.20 grams per cubic centimetre of apparent density have been observed in this material. At 65% relative humidity, moisture regain capacity is 11%, while at 100% RH, moisture regain capacity is 32%. The fibre has a moderate crystalline structure. Around the fibre axis, the spiral angle is 20–25°. 9.7% elastic strain is found in sisal fibres with a diameter of 21.5103 cm. Transverse compression of these fibres is higher than longitudinal compression. Lignin in sisal fibres causes them to fade rapidly when exposed to sunlight. The moisture reabsorption value of these fibres is affected by their swelling. Despite their low porosity, plant fibres with high moisture absorption swelling do not show much change in porosity. This indicates a less organised molecular arrangement in indirectly dried fibres. The chemical, physical, and mechanical composition of sisal fibres is shown in Table1.Table 1
Chemical, physical, and mechanical composition of sisal fibres.
IngredientsSisal fibres (%)Cellulose41.6–62.6Hemicellulose9.2–14.6Lignin11.4–19.5Density (g/cm3)1.28–1.42Tensile strength (MPa)126–860Tensile modulus (GPa)4.6–16.8Elongation (%)1.54–3.85Fibre diameter (µm)145–440


## 2.3. Flax Fibres

They range from 25 to 150“millimetres in length and have a diameter of 12 to 16”micrometres. Shorter tow fibres are used for coarser fabrics, while longer line fibres are used for refined fabrics. The flexibility and texture of the fabric are enhanced by flax fibre’s “nodes.” Flax fibres have irregular polygonal cross sections, which contribute to the fabric’s abrasive surface. The chemical composition of flax fibres is given in Table2.Table 2
Chemical composition of flax fibres.
IngredientsRaw flax%Retted flax%Cellulose56.564.1Hemicellulose15.416.7Pectin3.81.8Lignin2.52.0Fat and wax1.31.5Water solubility10.53.9Moisture regain capacity (water)10.010.0Total100%100%


## 2.4. Preparation of Fibres

Sisal and flax fibres of five millimetres were cut. A total of three hours of cooking in a methanol/benzene mixture was required to remove waxes and low-molecular-weight species from the fibres before further processing. Hemicellulose was removed from the fibres by soaking them in a 3% NaOH solution for three hours before washing. In the following days, we rinsed and dried the fibres at 90°C over the course of 24 hours.


## 2.5. Composite Preparation

In a vacuum oven set at 150°C for 14 hours, the fibres were dried before being mixed. Chemical treatments and compounding processes were used to determine the mechanical properties of flax and sisal fibre blends. Ingredients were mixed in an internal mixer and extruded using a twin screw extruder to create the final product. In the internal mixer, they were all mixed for 15 minutes at 60 rpm and 190°C after they were loaded. A speed of 60 rpm was set to run the twin screw extruder (rpm). The first zone was set at 170°C, the second at 180°C, the third at 185°C, and the fourth at 190°C (at die). Figure2 depicts the twin screw extrusion process in schematic form.Figure 2
Schematic of the twin screw extrusion process.A 12-hour vacuum oven at 120°C was used for both mixing procedures. Using an injection moulding machine, the pellets were injected in dry form. Plastic pellets were injected directly into the injection moulding machine as a comparison. As shown in Figure3, the injection moulding process follows a flow chart. The ASTM D5943, ASTM D638, ASTM D256, and ASTM D570 standards were followed in the moulding of the samples. The true fibre content of composites was determined using xylene. In an oven, the recovered fibres were dried and weighed after the matrix had been dissolved and removed. Table 3 shows the different composite compositions and their descriptions.Figure 3
Schematic of the injection moulding process.Table 3
Detailed description of the composite specimens and its compositions.
Description of the composite specimenPolypropylene (PP) (wt%)Sisal fibres (wt%)Flax fibres (wt%)PP10000PP/SF70300PP/FF70030PP/25SF/5FF702505PP/20SF/10FF702010PP/15SF/15FF701515PP/10SF/20FF701020


## 2.6. Characterizations

### 2.6.1. Measurement of Fibre Length

The composites were heated in a furnace for 4 hours at 500°C to eliminate short glass fibres. The length of the fibres was determined using a reflectance light microscope on 200 samples.


### 2.6.2. Evaluation of Mechanical Properties

The speed of the Universal Testing Machine was set at five millimetres per second during the testing. ASTM D256-compliant impact tests were performed on Izods that had been notched. A hammer used to test the composite’s impact characteristics weighed 25 kg. The crosshead speed on an ASTM D5943-compliant Universal Testing Machine was 5 mm/s. Figure4 reveals the impact test specimen position.Figure 4
Impact test specimen position.


## 2.6.1. Measurement of Fibre Length

The composites were heated in a furnace for 4 hours at 500°C to eliminate short glass fibres. The length of the fibres was determined using a reflectance light microscope on 200 samples.


## 2.6.2. Evaluation of Mechanical Properties

The speed of the Universal Testing Machine was set at five millimetres per second during the testing. ASTM D256-compliant impact tests were performed on Izods that had been notched. A hammer used to test the composite’s impact characteristics weighed 25 kg. The crosshead speed on an ASTM D5943-compliant Universal Testing Machine was 5 mm/s. Figure4 reveals the impact test specimen position.Figure 4
Impact test specimen position.


## 2.7. Water Absorption Properties

According to ASTM D570, PP and fibre composites were tested for water absorption. During this experiment, five samples were submerged in distilled water (2 days). The water absorption rate formula is given as follows:(1)percentageofwaterabsorption=SW2−SW1SW1×100,where SW1 = specimen weight before the test (grams) and SW2 = specimen weight after the test (grams).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Mechanical Properties

#### 3.1.1. Ultimate Tensile Strength and Young’s Modulus

Composite materials, as shown in Figure5, have high tensile strength and yield stress. When sisal fibres were added to polypropylene, Young’s modulus increased. After flax fibres had been added to polypropylene/sisal fibre composites, tensile strength as well as Young’s modulus increased. The interfacial adhesion of sisal-flax fibres and polypropylene matrix increased as a result of the composites’ improved tensile properties. In comparison with polypropylene-sisal fibre composites, flax fibre-reinforced composites with a final tensile strength of 34.64 MPa have the best bonding and load-carrying capacity. Moreover, 0 wt% flax fibre-reinforced composites have a minimum tensile strength of 29.46 MPa. Tensile strength values of polypropylene-sisal fibre composites filled with 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt% of flax fibres were 29.46, 30.56, 31.57, 33.12, and 34.64 MPa, respectively. Figure 6 illustrates how flax fibre content affects Young’s modulus in pure and hybrid composites.Figure 5
Effect of flax fibre content on tensile strength of pure and hybrid composites.Figure 6
Effect of flax fibre content on Young’s modulus of pure and hybrid composites.Using sisal fibre and polypropylene as a base, composites with a glass fibre content of 30 wt% were investigated to test the effects of glass fibre on composites. The 22.84 vol percent for sisal fibre and 14.23 vol percent for glass fibre are used to fabricate the composites. Adding glass fibres to the sisal fibre-polypropylene composite increased its strength slightly. Flax fibres, on the other hand, had no effect on Young’s modulus and flexural modulus of polypropylene-silica fibre composites. Young’s modulus and flexural modulus of polypropylene-sisal fibre composites were not significantly different when flax fibres were added. Flax fibre contents of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt% correspond to 3.89, 5.42, 6.44, 9.97, and 10.62 vol%, respectively. Sisal fibre-polypropylene composites were found to have little or no synergistic effect when flax fibres were added, according to the study.


#### 3.1.2. Flexural Strength and Flexural Modulus

Bending the composite specimens in three directions results in a high degree of flexibility (see Figure7). Due to the highest possible amount of flax fibre content present inside the composites, composite specimens reinforced with 20 wt% flax fibre had a better flexural strength of 71.38 MPa. The entire absence of flax fibre particles inside the composite specimens resulted in a minimum flexural strength of 67.01 MPa, that is, in 0 wt% flax fibre-polypropylene composites. The flexural strength ranged from 66.51 MPa to 71.38 MPa when polypropylene matrix-sisal fibre-reinforced composites were mixed with flax fibres at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt%. It was found that increasing the flax fibre content had no significant impact on hybrid composites’ flexural properties during the mixing process and the flax fibres were thoroughly mixed, as shown in Figure 8.Figure 7
Effect of flax fibre content on flexural strength of pure and hybrid composites.Figure 8
Effect of flax fibre content on flexural modulus of pure and hybrid composites.Flexural moduli of pure and hybrid composites were affected by flax fibre content, as shown in Figure8. In polypropylene-sisal fibre composites reinforced with 0 wt% and 20 wt% of flax fibres, the maximum and minimum three-point bending test moduli were found to be 1.32 and 4.82 GPa, respectively. Composites reinforced with five, ten, fifteen, and twenty wt%. of fibres had flexural modulus values of 1.89, 3.97, 4.36, and 4.38 GPa, respectively. Flax fibres were added to epoxy polypropylene matrix-sisal fibre-reinforced composites to improve the flexural modulus.


#### 3.1.3. Impact Strength

Adding flax fibres to natural fibre-polypropylene composites, on the other hand, was found to improve mechanical performance as per a number of researchers. Polypropylene’s impact strength as a stress concentrator was lowered when sisal fibres were added. Impact strength of sisal-polypropylene composites was improved by adding flax fibres. The impact strength of composite specimens during the Izod impact test is shown in Figure9. Flax fibre composites containing 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20% flax fibres had impact strengths of 14.78, 15.23, 16.86, 19.48, and 21.52 kJ/m2. Surprisingly, as the weight percentage of flax fibres dispersed in the polypropylene-sisal fibre-reinforced composites increased, the specimens’ impact strength improved. The highest impact strength of the 20 w% flax fibre-reinforced composites was 21.52 kJ/m2, while the minimum impact strength of the 0 wt% flax fibre-reinforced composites was 14.78 kJ/m2.Figure 9
Effect of flax fibre content on impact strength of pure and hybrid composites.


#### 3.1.4. Water Absorption Behaviour

The water absorption behaviour of sisal-flax fibre-polypropylene composite is shown in Figure10. Water absorption in sisal fibre-polypropylene composites was found to be reduced by flax fibres. In a polypropylene matrix containing flax and sisal fibres, researchers found that water absorption decreased.Figure 10
Water absorption of pure and hybrid composites during 48 hours of immersion in water.


## 3.1. Mechanical Properties

### 3.1.1. Ultimate Tensile Strength and Young’s Modulus

Composite materials, as shown in Figure5, have high tensile strength and yield stress. When sisal fibres were added to polypropylene, Young’s modulus increased. After flax fibres had been added to polypropylene/sisal fibre composites, tensile strength as well as Young’s modulus increased. The interfacial adhesion of sisal-flax fibres and polypropylene matrix increased as a result of the composites’ improved tensile properties. In comparison with polypropylene-sisal fibre composites, flax fibre-reinforced composites with a final tensile strength of 34.64 MPa have the best bonding and load-carrying capacity. Moreover, 0 wt% flax fibre-reinforced composites have a minimum tensile strength of 29.46 MPa. Tensile strength values of polypropylene-sisal fibre composites filled with 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt% of flax fibres were 29.46, 30.56, 31.57, 33.12, and 34.64 MPa, respectively. Figure 6 illustrates how flax fibre content affects Young’s modulus in pure and hybrid composites.Figure 5
Effect of flax fibre content on tensile strength of pure and hybrid composites.Figure 6
Effect of flax fibre content on Young’s modulus of pure and hybrid composites.Using sisal fibre and polypropylene as a base, composites with a glass fibre content of 30 wt% were investigated to test the effects of glass fibre on composites. The 22.84 vol percent for sisal fibre and 14.23 vol percent for glass fibre are used to fabricate the composites. Adding glass fibres to the sisal fibre-polypropylene composite increased its strength slightly. Flax fibres, on the other hand, had no effect on Young’s modulus and flexural modulus of polypropylene-silica fibre composites. Young’s modulus and flexural modulus of polypropylene-sisal fibre composites were not significantly different when flax fibres were added. Flax fibre contents of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt% correspond to 3.89, 5.42, 6.44, 9.97, and 10.62 vol%, respectively. Sisal fibre-polypropylene composites were found to have little or no synergistic effect when flax fibres were added, according to the study.


### 3.1.2. Flexural Strength and Flexural Modulus

Bending the composite specimens in three directions results in a high degree of flexibility (see Figure7). Due to the highest possible amount of flax fibre content present inside the composites, composite specimens reinforced with 20 wt% flax fibre had a better flexural strength of 71.38 MPa. The entire absence of flax fibre particles inside the composite specimens resulted in a minimum flexural strength of 67.01 MPa, that is, in 0 wt% flax fibre-polypropylene composites. The flexural strength ranged from 66.51 MPa to 71.38 MPa when polypropylene matrix-sisal fibre-reinforced composites were mixed with flax fibres at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt%. It was found that increasing the flax fibre content had no significant impact on hybrid composites’ flexural properties during the mixing process and the flax fibres were thoroughly mixed, as shown in Figure 8.Figure 7
Effect of flax fibre content on flexural strength of pure and hybrid composites.Figure 8
Effect of flax fibre content on flexural modulus of pure and hybrid composites.Flexural moduli of pure and hybrid composites were affected by flax fibre content, as shown in Figure8. In polypropylene-sisal fibre composites reinforced with 0 wt% and 20 wt% of flax fibres, the maximum and minimum three-point bending test moduli were found to be 1.32 and 4.82 GPa, respectively. Composites reinforced with five, ten, fifteen, and twenty wt%. of fibres had flexural modulus values of 1.89, 3.97, 4.36, and 4.38 GPa, respectively. Flax fibres were added to epoxy polypropylene matrix-sisal fibre-reinforced composites to improve the flexural modulus.


### 3.1.3. Impact Strength

Adding flax fibres to natural fibre-polypropylene composites, on the other hand, was found to improve mechanical performance as per a number of researchers. Polypropylene’s impact strength as a stress concentrator was lowered when sisal fibres were added. Impact strength of sisal-polypropylene composites was improved by adding flax fibres. The impact strength of composite specimens during the Izod impact test is shown in Figure9. Flax fibre composites containing 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20% flax fibres had impact strengths of 14.78, 15.23, 16.86, 19.48, and 21.52 kJ/m2. Surprisingly, as the weight percentage of flax fibres dispersed in the polypropylene-sisal fibre-reinforced composites increased, the specimens’ impact strength improved. The highest impact strength of the 20 w% flax fibre-reinforced composites was 21.52 kJ/m2, while the minimum impact strength of the 0 wt% flax fibre-reinforced composites was 14.78 kJ/m2.Figure 9
Effect of flax fibre content on impact strength of pure and hybrid composites.


### 3.1.4. Water Absorption Behaviour

The water absorption behaviour of sisal-flax fibre-polypropylene composite is shown in Figure10. Water absorption in sisal fibre-polypropylene composites was found to be reduced by flax fibres. In a polypropylene matrix containing flax and sisal fibres, researchers found that water absorption decreased.Figure 10
Water absorption of pure and hybrid composites during 48 hours of immersion in water.


## 3.1.1. Ultimate Tensile Strength and Young’s Modulus

Composite materials, as shown in Figure5, have high tensile strength and yield stress. When sisal fibres were added to polypropylene, Young’s modulus increased. After flax fibres had been added to polypropylene/sisal fibre composites, tensile strength as well as Young’s modulus increased. The interfacial adhesion of sisal-flax fibres and polypropylene matrix increased as a result of the composites’ improved tensile properties. In comparison with polypropylene-sisal fibre composites, flax fibre-reinforced composites with a final tensile strength of 34.64 MPa have the best bonding and load-carrying capacity. Moreover, 0 wt% flax fibre-reinforced composites have a minimum tensile strength of 29.46 MPa. Tensile strength values of polypropylene-sisal fibre composites filled with 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt% of flax fibres were 29.46, 30.56, 31.57, 33.12, and 34.64 MPa, respectively. Figure 6 illustrates how flax fibre content affects Young’s modulus in pure and hybrid composites.Figure 5
Effect of flax fibre content on tensile strength of pure and hybrid composites.Figure 6
Effect of flax fibre content on Young’s modulus of pure and hybrid composites.Using sisal fibre and polypropylene as a base, composites with a glass fibre content of 30 wt% were investigated to test the effects of glass fibre on composites. The 22.84 vol percent for sisal fibre and 14.23 vol percent for glass fibre are used to fabricate the composites. Adding glass fibres to the sisal fibre-polypropylene composite increased its strength slightly. Flax fibres, on the other hand, had no effect on Young’s modulus and flexural modulus of polypropylene-silica fibre composites. Young’s modulus and flexural modulus of polypropylene-sisal fibre composites were not significantly different when flax fibres were added. Flax fibre contents of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt% correspond to 3.89, 5.42, 6.44, 9.97, and 10.62 vol%, respectively. Sisal fibre-polypropylene composites were found to have little or no synergistic effect when flax fibres were added, according to the study.


## 3.1.2. Flexural Strength and Flexural Modulus

Bending the composite specimens in three directions results in a high degree of flexibility (see Figure7). Due to the highest possible amount of flax fibre content present inside the composites, composite specimens reinforced with 20 wt% flax fibre had a better flexural strength of 71.38 MPa. The entire absence of flax fibre particles inside the composite specimens resulted in a minimum flexural strength of 67.01 MPa, that is, in 0 wt% flax fibre-polypropylene composites. The flexural strength ranged from 66.51 MPa to 71.38 MPa when polypropylene matrix-sisal fibre-reinforced composites were mixed with flax fibres at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt%. It was found that increasing the flax fibre content had no significant impact on hybrid composites’ flexural properties during the mixing process and the flax fibres were thoroughly mixed, as shown in Figure 8.Figure 7
Effect of flax fibre content on flexural strength of pure and hybrid composites.Figure 8
Effect of flax fibre content on flexural modulus of pure and hybrid composites.Flexural moduli of pure and hybrid composites were affected by flax fibre content, as shown in Figure8. In polypropylene-sisal fibre composites reinforced with 0 wt% and 20 wt% of flax fibres, the maximum and minimum three-point bending test moduli were found to be 1.32 and 4.82 GPa, respectively. Composites reinforced with five, ten, fifteen, and twenty wt%. of fibres had flexural modulus values of 1.89, 3.97, 4.36, and 4.38 GPa, respectively. Flax fibres were added to epoxy polypropylene matrix-sisal fibre-reinforced composites to improve the flexural modulus.


## 3.1.3. Impact Strength

Adding flax fibres to natural fibre-polypropylene composites, on the other hand, was found to improve mechanical performance as per a number of researchers. Polypropylene’s impact strength as a stress concentrator was lowered when sisal fibres were added. Impact strength of sisal-polypropylene composites was improved by adding flax fibres. The impact strength of composite specimens during the Izod impact test is shown in Figure9. Flax fibre composites containing 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20% flax fibres had impact strengths of 14.78, 15.23, 16.86, 19.48, and 21.52 kJ/m2. Surprisingly, as the weight percentage of flax fibres dispersed in the polypropylene-sisal fibre-reinforced composites increased, the specimens’ impact strength improved. The highest impact strength of the 20 w% flax fibre-reinforced composites was 21.52 kJ/m2, while the minimum impact strength of the 0 wt% flax fibre-reinforced composites was 14.78 kJ/m2.Figure 9
Effect of flax fibre content on impact strength of pure and hybrid composites.


## 3.1.4. Water Absorption Behaviour

The water absorption behaviour of sisal-flax fibre-polypropylene composite is shown in Figure10. Water absorption in sisal fibre-polypropylene composites was found to be reduced by flax fibres. In a polypropylene matrix containing flax and sisal fibres, researchers found that water absorption decreased.Figure 10
Water absorption of pure and hybrid composites during 48 hours of immersion in water.


## 4. Conclusions

A polypropylene matrix reinforced with sisal fibres was subjected to a flax fibre addition experiment to determine the mechanical properties of the composite. In addition to improving composite tensile, flexural, and impact properties, the compatibilizer improved interfacial adhesion. It was found that the fusion of flax fibres did not significantly improve the mechanical properties of composite materials. When compared to other weight percentages of flax fibres, composites comprising 20 wt% flax fibres, which were added into the polypropylene matrix-sisal fibre-reinforced biocomposites, demonstrated superior tensile and flexural behaviour. The water absorption of sisal-PP composites was reduced when they were hybridised with flax fibres. Flax fibre composites of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt% showed impact strengths of 14.78, 15.23, 16.86, 19.48, and 21.52 kJ/m2.



---

*Source: 4594465-2021-11-22.xml*