# Preparation and Properties of Cross-Linked Starch Nanocrystals/Polylactic Acid Nanocomposites

Authors: Zuodong Yin; Jiliang Zeng; Cai Wang; Zelin Pan
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Cross-linked starch nanocrystals (CStN)/polylactic acid (PLA) nanocomposites were prepared by blending CStN and PLA, wherein CStN were homogeneously dispersed in the nanocomposites. The structure and morphology of the nanocomposites were studied through FTIR, XRD, and SEM. The results of mechanical test showed that the strength and toughness of the nanocomposites could be improved when the additive amount of hydrophobic CStN was 3% (weight ratio). Meanwhile, the microstructures of tensile fracture surface showed that CStN were uniformly dispersed in PLA matrix, and the tensile fracture surface was presented as ductile fracture. Moreover, water vapor permeability experiments illustrated that the addition of CStN reduced the water vapor permeability of PLA nanocomposites, so CStN have some resistance to water vapor. Those above indicated that CStN have functions of reinforcement and toughness in PLA matrix; therefore, they are expected to be used as functional additives in polymer matrix such as PLA, polycaprolactone (PCL), and polybutylene succinate (PBS).


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As a kind of natural polymer, starch is of low price, biodegradable, and rich of sources and also has a broad industrial application. To study the preparation and application of functional starch derivatives, especially using industrial starch as raw material, will have a more extensive application prospect. Starch nanocrystals [1–3] are a kind of natural starch derivative and have a high crystallinity and hydrophilic structure of platelet, and they attract much attention of many researchers. Researchers have proceeded chemical modifications on the surface of starch nanocrystals and have prepared fatty acid modified starch nanocrystals [4], acetylated starch nanocrystals [5], polycaprolactone grafted starch nanocrystals [6, 7], polylactic acid grafted starch nanocrystals [8], polystyrene grafted starch nanocrystals [9, 10], cross-linked starch nanocrystals [11], and so on to improve the compatibility and the dispersion stability of starch nanocrystals in polymer matrix. It shows that the mechanical properties of the nanocomposites obtained by blending the prepared polycaprolactone grafted starch nanocrystals with polylactic acid (PLA) are enhanced obviously in literature [7].In this paper, hydrophobic cross-linked starch nanocrystals were prepared through a simple cross-linking modification reaction, and, then, they were blended with PLA to get CStN/PLA nanocomposites. The structure, mechanical properties, and micromorphology of the nanocomposites were studied, and the effects of CStN on the nanocomposites were also analyzed; moreover, the effect of CStN on water vapor permeability of the nanocomposites was researched by cup method.


## 2. Materials and Methods

The corn starch with the moisture content of 14% was industrial products and purchased from Beijing Hongxing Starch Factory. Epichlorohydrin was supplied by Beijing Chemical Works and its grade was AR. The polylactic acid (PLA), whose thermal deformation temperature was 56°C, was sheet and from Shenzhen Guanghua Weiye Industrial Co., Ltd. (China). Other reagents were all commercially available chemical reagents.


### 2.1. Preparation of Cross-Linked Starch Nanocrystals

180 g of starch (dry weight) was mixed with 1250 mL of sulfuric acid (2.87 M) [1]. The suspension was kept with the constant stirring speed under 45°C for acid hydrolysis for 7 days. Then the resulting suspension was washed with deionized water by successive centrifugations until the pH of the suspension was neutral. After the treatment of ultrasonic processor (Ultrasonic Cell Crusher, Type JY92-II, Ningbo XinYi Ultrasonic Equipment Co., Ltd. (China); the maximum power is 650 w) for 3 min to ensure that the starch nanocrystals dispersed homogeneously, the aqueous suspension of starch nanocrystals with the weight concentration of about 0.8% was obtained.2500 mL of the above aqueous suspension (equivalent to 20.0 g of dry starch) was put into the 5 L three-neck flask equipped with a reflux condensing tube, and, then, under stirring, the aqueous solution of NaOH (5%) was added to keep the pH around 10 to 11. When the temperature of the solution was heated to 30–35°C, 2.0 g of epichlorohydrin was added. After 2 hours, we measured the pH and refilled the alkali to keep the pH around 10-11. Then, hydrochloric acid was added to neutralize after reacting for another 6 hours, and the product was separated by centrifugation and washed with deionized water, acetone, and chloroform, respectively, 3 times for each. Finally, the resulting chloroform suspension of CStN was obtained, whose concentration was about 0.5% (wt). The molar ratio of epichlorohydrin (ECH) and starch glucose unit (AGU) was about 0.08, which was calculated through utilizing the weight changes of starch nanocrystals before and after reaction.


### 2.2. Preparation of Cross-Linked Starch Nanocrystals/PLA Nanocomposites

Under the stirring, the above chloroform suspensions of CStN with dry weight 0.1 g, 0.3 g, 0.5 g, and 0.8 g were separately added to 80 mL chloroform solution which contained 10 g PLA, and the chloroform was recycled by gradual distillation. Then, the resulting products were dried in a vacuum at 60°C for 4 h, and different additive amounts of CStN/PLA nanocomposites were obtained. Subsequently, they were put on the hydraulic press (double-speed manual hydraulic press, Type YYS-1, Guoying FengHua Machinery Factory), and the films with the thickness of 0.1–0.3 mm were molded by hot pressing at 180–190°C and marked, respectively, as CStN-PLA-1, CStN-PLA-2, CStN-PLA-3, and CStN-PLA-4, whose additive amount of CStN corresponded to 1%, 3%, 5%, and 8%, respectively.


### 2.3. Materials Characterization

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the nanocomposites films in the range of 4000–500 cm−1 were recorded on FTIR TENSOR 27 spectra (BRUKER, Germany) with the method of ATR-FTIR.The XRD patterns of CStN/PLA nanocomposites films were obtained on Rigaku D/max-2500 X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα radiation at 40 kV and 200 mA. The diffraction data were recorded over the 2
θ range of 2–40°.The morphologies of fractured surfaces of CStN/PLA nanocomposites after the tensile tests were observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, JSM-6701F, JEOL, Japan) with the highest resolution of 1 nm. The sample surface was first coated with a thin layer of gold.According to China National Standards GB/T 1040-2006, the mechanical properties (including tensile modulus, tensile strength, and breaking elongation) of the nanocomposites films were tested on universal tensile tester (Instron 3365 machine, Instron Company, UK) at 50 mm·min−1. The samples were with the size of 150 mm × 10 mm. At least five specimens were tested for an average value.Thermal analysis of CStN/PLA nanocomposites was carried out using a DSC Q200 differential calorimeter (TA instruments, USA) equipped with a manual liquid nitrogen cooling system between 0 and 200°C at a rate of 20°C·min−1. The using dosage of the samples was 7–10 mg and the flow rate of nitrogen was 50 mL·min−1.


### 2.4. Water Vapor Permeability (WVP) Test

Water vapor permeability of the nanocomposites films was determined by the method according to China National Standards GB 1037-88 and the thickness of the films was measured on the basis of China National Standards GB/T6672-2001. The samples were placed in the permeability cup filled with the desiccant (CaCl2) and then sealed up and put into a temperature humidity chamber with the temperature of 38
±
0.6°C and the relative humidity of 90
±
2%. There was no need to weigh the samples at intervals until the contiguous mass difference was less than 5%. In accordance with the resulting data, water vapor permeability (WVP) [(g·m)/(m2·s·Pa)] was calculated by the following formula:(1)
WVP
=
Δ
m
·
d
A
·
t
·
Δ
p
,where Δ
m (g) was taken for the contiguous mass difference, d (m) the thickness of the films, A (m2) the valid water vapor permeability area of the films with the value of 0.002826 m2, t (s) the interval time, and Δ
p (Pa) the pressure difference, whose value was 5966.82 Pa.


## 2.1. Preparation of Cross-Linked Starch Nanocrystals

180 g of starch (dry weight) was mixed with 1250 mL of sulfuric acid (2.87 M) [1]. The suspension was kept with the constant stirring speed under 45°C for acid hydrolysis for 7 days. Then the resulting suspension was washed with deionized water by successive centrifugations until the pH of the suspension was neutral. After the treatment of ultrasonic processor (Ultrasonic Cell Crusher, Type JY92-II, Ningbo XinYi Ultrasonic Equipment Co., Ltd. (China); the maximum power is 650 w) for 3 min to ensure that the starch nanocrystals dispersed homogeneously, the aqueous suspension of starch nanocrystals with the weight concentration of about 0.8% was obtained.2500 mL of the above aqueous suspension (equivalent to 20.0 g of dry starch) was put into the 5 L three-neck flask equipped with a reflux condensing tube, and, then, under stirring, the aqueous solution of NaOH (5%) was added to keep the pH around 10 to 11. When the temperature of the solution was heated to 30–35°C, 2.0 g of epichlorohydrin was added. After 2 hours, we measured the pH and refilled the alkali to keep the pH around 10-11. Then, hydrochloric acid was added to neutralize after reacting for another 6 hours, and the product was separated by centrifugation and washed with deionized water, acetone, and chloroform, respectively, 3 times for each. Finally, the resulting chloroform suspension of CStN was obtained, whose concentration was about 0.5% (wt). The molar ratio of epichlorohydrin (ECH) and starch glucose unit (AGU) was about 0.08, which was calculated through utilizing the weight changes of starch nanocrystals before and after reaction.


## 2.2. Preparation of Cross-Linked Starch Nanocrystals/PLA Nanocomposites

Under the stirring, the above chloroform suspensions of CStN with dry weight 0.1 g, 0.3 g, 0.5 g, and 0.8 g were separately added to 80 mL chloroform solution which contained 10 g PLA, and the chloroform was recycled by gradual distillation. Then, the resulting products were dried in a vacuum at 60°C for 4 h, and different additive amounts of CStN/PLA nanocomposites were obtained. Subsequently, they were put on the hydraulic press (double-speed manual hydraulic press, Type YYS-1, Guoying FengHua Machinery Factory), and the films with the thickness of 0.1–0.3 mm were molded by hot pressing at 180–190°C and marked, respectively, as CStN-PLA-1, CStN-PLA-2, CStN-PLA-3, and CStN-PLA-4, whose additive amount of CStN corresponded to 1%, 3%, 5%, and 8%, respectively.


## 2.3. Materials Characterization

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the nanocomposites films in the range of 4000–500 cm−1 were recorded on FTIR TENSOR 27 spectra (BRUKER, Germany) with the method of ATR-FTIR.The XRD patterns of CStN/PLA nanocomposites films were obtained on Rigaku D/max-2500 X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα radiation at 40 kV and 200 mA. The diffraction data were recorded over the 2
θ range of 2–40°.The morphologies of fractured surfaces of CStN/PLA nanocomposites after the tensile tests were observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, JSM-6701F, JEOL, Japan) with the highest resolution of 1 nm. The sample surface was first coated with a thin layer of gold.According to China National Standards GB/T 1040-2006, the mechanical properties (including tensile modulus, tensile strength, and breaking elongation) of the nanocomposites films were tested on universal tensile tester (Instron 3365 machine, Instron Company, UK) at 50 mm·min−1. The samples were with the size of 150 mm × 10 mm. At least five specimens were tested for an average value.Thermal analysis of CStN/PLA nanocomposites was carried out using a DSC Q200 differential calorimeter (TA instruments, USA) equipped with a manual liquid nitrogen cooling system between 0 and 200°C at a rate of 20°C·min−1. The using dosage of the samples was 7–10 mg and the flow rate of nitrogen was 50 mL·min−1.


## 2.4. Water Vapor Permeability (WVP) Test

Water vapor permeability of the nanocomposites films was determined by the method according to China National Standards GB 1037-88 and the thickness of the films was measured on the basis of China National Standards GB/T6672-2001. The samples were placed in the permeability cup filled with the desiccant (CaCl2) and then sealed up and put into a temperature humidity chamber with the temperature of 38
±
0.6°C and the relative humidity of 90
±
2%. There was no need to weigh the samples at intervals until the contiguous mass difference was less than 5%. In accordance with the resulting data, water vapor permeability (WVP) [(g·m)/(m2·s·Pa)] was calculated by the following formula:(1)
WVP
=
Δ
m
·
d
A
·
t
·
Δ
p
,where Δ
m (g) was taken for the contiguous mass difference, d (m) the thickness of the films, A (m2) the valid water vapor permeability area of the films with the value of 0.002826 m2, t (s) the interval time, and Δ
p (Pa) the pressure difference, whose value was 5966.82 Pa.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. FTIR Spectrum Analysis

The FTIR spectra of CStN/PLA nanocomposites are shown in Figure1. At 1750 cm−1, all the samples have strong stretching vibration absorption of ester carbonyl in PLA and no obvious difference, which indicates that CStN almost have no effect on the molecule structure of PLA. As compared with PLA, CStN/PLA nanocomposites have slight difference in absorption peaks of 3392 cm−1 (the stretching vibration absorption of OH in CStN) and 1645 cm−1 (the stretching vibration absorption of ether bond in CStN). The absorption peaks of 3392 cm−1 and 1645 cm−1 become more obvious with the increase of additive CStN, which explains that CStN are of good dispersibility in PLA.Figure 1
ATR-FTIR spectra of CStN/PLA nanocomposites and PLA films.


### 3.2. WAXD Analysis

X-ray patterns of different compositions are displayed in Figure2 and there appears no obvious crystal diffraction peak. At 2
θ of 15°, 17°, 18°, and 21°, there are weak peaks in the diffractogram of CStN-PLA-4, which are the typical diffraction peaks of CStN and further illustrate that the high crystallinity structure of CStN did not alter under the condition of hot pressing process and that the interaction between CStN and PLA matrix is not apparent.Figure 2
X-ray diffraction patterns of CStN/PLA nanocomposites and PLA films.


### 3.3. Morphology of the Nanocomposites Films

The SEM images of fractured morphologies of CStN/PLA nanocomposites are shown in Figure3. In Figure 3(a), the fractured morphology is clear and relatively smooth, which indicates that CStN hardly influence the interface of nanocomposites and do not play a significant reinforcement. There are many evident uniform microhumps resulting from the ductile fracture found in Figure 3(b), assuming that CStN are compatible with PLA matrix and form a certain interaction that would reinforce and toughen PLA matrix, and it also speculates that the mechanical properties of CStN-PLA-2 are superior to those of CStN-PLA-1. It is shown in Figure 3(c) that the fractured morphology is relatively clear and CStN are significantly accumulated and have a relatively poor uniformity in PLA, resulting in the poor mechanical properties of the nanocomposites. In Figure 3(d), there are a lot of obvious uniform microhumps forming from the ductile fracture on the fractured surface, which postulates that there exists a certain interaction between CStN and PLA matrix; nevertheless, the mechanical properties are worse because of the obvious cracks and the accumulation of particles.Figure 3
Morphologies of fractured surfaces of CStN/PLA nanocomposites after the tensile tests.
(a)
CStN-PLA-1
(b)
CStN-PLA-2
(c)
CStN-PLA-3
(d)
CStN-PLA-4


### 3.4. Mechanical Properties of CStN/PLA Nanocomposites

Figure4 shows the change of the mechanical properties of CStN/PLA nanocomposites. When the additive amount of CStN is less than 3%, tensile strength, tensile modulus, and breaking elongation are all increased with the rising additive amount. When arriving 3%, tensile strength of CStN/PLA nanocomposites is increased about 12%, tensile modulus about 35%, and breaking elongation 16%; namely, the strength and toughness of CStN/PLA nanocomposites are enhanced, which agrees with the microstructure of the nanocomposites that Figure 3 reflects. This is because CStN are compatible and dispersible well in PLA matrix and the interaction force between CStN and PLA is enlarged; therefore, CStN have functions of enhancement and toughness; when the amount is more than 3%, the functions of enhancement and toughness are weakened. The reason is that the dispersity of abundant CStN in PLA is turned worse and CStN begin aggregating, which weakens the interaction force between CStN and PLA. As the amount reaches 8%, the volume fraction of CStN in PLA matrix is increased and the matrix layer of adjacent CStN particles becomes thinner, which makes the interaction force between the particles strengthen, resulting in a high stress triaxiality surrounding the particle and making the shift of molecular chain difficult; sequentially, the tensile modulus of CStN/PLA nanocomposites is larger than that of pure PLA.Figure 4
Mechanical properties of CStN/PLA nanocomposites.


### 3.5. Thermal Performance Analysis

The thermal performances of CStN/PLA nanocomposites are exhibited in Figure5. The softening temperature of PLA is about 62°C, and the softening temperature of CStN/PLA nanocomposites is lower, about 53°C. The melting temperature decreases slightly with the increasing additive amount of CStN. The reason of softening temperature decreased should be mainly because the lubricating effect of nanoscale CStN between PLA molecules reduces the interactions of PLA molecules. CStN do not interact with PLA matrix during the melting process, and the lubricating effect is no more important than the thermal motion of PLA macromolecules, so the increasing additive amount of CStN has little effect on the melting temperature of PLA.Figure 5
DSC thermograms of CStN/PLA nanocomposites and PLA films.


### 3.6. Water Vapor Permeability Analysis

Table1 shows the water vapor permeability (WVP) of PLA and different CStN/PLA nanocomposites films. After blending PLA and CStN, the WVP is all reduced; the reason is that CStN are of good hydrophilicity that strengthen the interaction force with water molecule and possess a high crystallinity, which make water molecule difficult to penetrate the sheet of CStN and need to move along the surface of CStN. The uniformly dispersive CStN slow the penetrating speed of water molecule; thus the WVP is decreased. Moreover, water molecules could cluster through personal hydrogen bond [12], which makes water clusters have a larger average size, and then the WVP of PLA nanocomposites is further reduced.Table 1
Water vapor permeability of CStN/PLA nanocomposites and PLA films.
CStN/%
Δ
m/g
d/m
t/h
WVP/(g ·m/(m2 ·s·Pa))
PLA
0
0.3127
1
.
46
×
10
-
4
72
10.44
×
10
-
1
6
CStN-PLA-1
1
0.0810
3
.
00
×
10
-
4
48
8.32
×
10
-
1
6
CStN-PLA-2
3
0.1789
1
.
51
×
10
-
4
48
8.23
×
10
-
1
6
CStN-PLA-3
5
0.1603
1
.
60
×
10
-
4
48
8.81
×
10
-
1
6
CStN-PLA-4
8
0.1136
2
.
44
×
10
-
4
48
9.51
×
10
-
1
6


## 3.1. FTIR Spectrum Analysis

The FTIR spectra of CStN/PLA nanocomposites are shown in Figure1. At 1750 cm−1, all the samples have strong stretching vibration absorption of ester carbonyl in PLA and no obvious difference, which indicates that CStN almost have no effect on the molecule structure of PLA. As compared with PLA, CStN/PLA nanocomposites have slight difference in absorption peaks of 3392 cm−1 (the stretching vibration absorption of OH in CStN) and 1645 cm−1 (the stretching vibration absorption of ether bond in CStN). The absorption peaks of 3392 cm−1 and 1645 cm−1 become more obvious with the increase of additive CStN, which explains that CStN are of good dispersibility in PLA.Figure 1
ATR-FTIR spectra of CStN/PLA nanocomposites and PLA films.


## 3.2. WAXD Analysis

X-ray patterns of different compositions are displayed in Figure2 and there appears no obvious crystal diffraction peak. At 2
θ of 15°, 17°, 18°, and 21°, there are weak peaks in the diffractogram of CStN-PLA-4, which are the typical diffraction peaks of CStN and further illustrate that the high crystallinity structure of CStN did not alter under the condition of hot pressing process and that the interaction between CStN and PLA matrix is not apparent.Figure 2
X-ray diffraction patterns of CStN/PLA nanocomposites and PLA films.


## 3.3. Morphology of the Nanocomposites Films

The SEM images of fractured morphologies of CStN/PLA nanocomposites are shown in Figure3. In Figure 3(a), the fractured morphology is clear and relatively smooth, which indicates that CStN hardly influence the interface of nanocomposites and do not play a significant reinforcement. There are many evident uniform microhumps resulting from the ductile fracture found in Figure 3(b), assuming that CStN are compatible with PLA matrix and form a certain interaction that would reinforce and toughen PLA matrix, and it also speculates that the mechanical properties of CStN-PLA-2 are superior to those of CStN-PLA-1. It is shown in Figure 3(c) that the fractured morphology is relatively clear and CStN are significantly accumulated and have a relatively poor uniformity in PLA, resulting in the poor mechanical properties of the nanocomposites. In Figure 3(d), there are a lot of obvious uniform microhumps forming from the ductile fracture on the fractured surface, which postulates that there exists a certain interaction between CStN and PLA matrix; nevertheless, the mechanical properties are worse because of the obvious cracks and the accumulation of particles.Figure 3
Morphologies of fractured surfaces of CStN/PLA nanocomposites after the tensile tests.
(a)
CStN-PLA-1
(b)
CStN-PLA-2
(c)
CStN-PLA-3
(d)
CStN-PLA-4


## 3.4. Mechanical Properties of CStN/PLA Nanocomposites

Figure4 shows the change of the mechanical properties of CStN/PLA nanocomposites. When the additive amount of CStN is less than 3%, tensile strength, tensile modulus, and breaking elongation are all increased with the rising additive amount. When arriving 3%, tensile strength of CStN/PLA nanocomposites is increased about 12%, tensile modulus about 35%, and breaking elongation 16%; namely, the strength and toughness of CStN/PLA nanocomposites are enhanced, which agrees with the microstructure of the nanocomposites that Figure 3 reflects. This is because CStN are compatible and dispersible well in PLA matrix and the interaction force between CStN and PLA is enlarged; therefore, CStN have functions of enhancement and toughness; when the amount is more than 3%, the functions of enhancement and toughness are weakened. The reason is that the dispersity of abundant CStN in PLA is turned worse and CStN begin aggregating, which weakens the interaction force between CStN and PLA. As the amount reaches 8%, the volume fraction of CStN in PLA matrix is increased and the matrix layer of adjacent CStN particles becomes thinner, which makes the interaction force between the particles strengthen, resulting in a high stress triaxiality surrounding the particle and making the shift of molecular chain difficult; sequentially, the tensile modulus of CStN/PLA nanocomposites is larger than that of pure PLA.Figure 4
Mechanical properties of CStN/PLA nanocomposites.


## 3.5. Thermal Performance Analysis

The thermal performances of CStN/PLA nanocomposites are exhibited in Figure5. The softening temperature of PLA is about 62°C, and the softening temperature of CStN/PLA nanocomposites is lower, about 53°C. The melting temperature decreases slightly with the increasing additive amount of CStN. The reason of softening temperature decreased should be mainly because the lubricating effect of nanoscale CStN between PLA molecules reduces the interactions of PLA molecules. CStN do not interact with PLA matrix during the melting process, and the lubricating effect is no more important than the thermal motion of PLA macromolecules, so the increasing additive amount of CStN has little effect on the melting temperature of PLA.Figure 5
DSC thermograms of CStN/PLA nanocomposites and PLA films.


## 3.6. Water Vapor Permeability Analysis

Table1 shows the water vapor permeability (WVP) of PLA and different CStN/PLA nanocomposites films. After blending PLA and CStN, the WVP is all reduced; the reason is that CStN are of good hydrophilicity that strengthen the interaction force with water molecule and possess a high crystallinity, which make water molecule difficult to penetrate the sheet of CStN and need to move along the surface of CStN. The uniformly dispersive CStN slow the penetrating speed of water molecule; thus the WVP is decreased. Moreover, water molecules could cluster through personal hydrogen bond [12], which makes water clusters have a larger average size, and then the WVP of PLA nanocomposites is further reduced.Table 1
Water vapor permeability of CStN/PLA nanocomposites and PLA films.
CStN/%
Δ
m/g
d/m
t/h
WVP/(g ·m/(m2 ·s·Pa))
PLA
0
0.3127
1
.
46
×
10
-
4
72
10.44
×
10
-
1
6
CStN-PLA-1
1
0.0810
3
.
00
×
10
-
4
48
8.32
×
10
-
1
6
CStN-PLA-2
3
0.1789
1
.
51
×
10
-
4
48
8.23
×
10
-
1
6
CStN-PLA-3
5
0.1603
1
.
60
×
10
-
4
48
8.81
×
10
-
1
6
CStN-PLA-4
8
0.1136
2
.
44
×
10
-
4
48
9.51
×
10
-
1
6


## 4. Conclusions

In cross-linked starch nanocrystals (CStN)/polylactic acid (PLA) nanocomposites, the addition of CStN can significantly improve the dispersive stability and interface compatibility in polymer matrix. When the additive amount of CStN was 3% (wt), the strength and toughness of PLA nanocomposites were increased. The addition of CStN can significantly reduce the softening temperature of PLA nanocomposites but did have little influence on its melting temperature. The water vapor permeability of CStN/PLA nanocomposites can reduce significantly. As a conclusion, the CStN were expected to be used as a functional biopolymer additive in polymer composites.



---

*Source: 454708-2015-03-29.xml*