# Synthesis and Characterisation of New Symmetrical Binucleating Ligands and Their Binuclear Copper(II) Complexes

Authors: K. Jothivenkatachalam; S. Chandra Mohan
Journal: Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

New symmetrical binucleating ligands N,N-bis[2-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-(4-methyl-piperazinomethyl)benzyl]-alkylamines L1 and L2 and their copper(II) complexes [Cu2L(X)2]·2H2O, where X = CH3COO−, C6H5COO−, Cl−, and C
l
O
4
-, were prepared and characterised. All the complexes undergo quasi-reversible reduction at negative potential (E = −0.48 to −1.02 V). The acetate and benzoate complexes undergo a two-step single electron transfer at –0.48 to –0.60 V and −0.9 to −1.02 V. The chloro and perchlorate complexes undergo a single step two-electron transfer at −0.55 to −0.75 V. Variable temperature magnetic studies show the presence of weak exchange interaction for acetate (−2 J around 25 to 40 cm−1) and benzoate (−2 J around 45 to 55 cm−1) bridged complexes and no exchange interaction is found for chloro and perchlorate complexes. ESR spectra of chloro and perchlorate complexes are like mononuclear copper(II) complexes with hyperfine splitting (A = 165 ± 5, g
∥ = 2.17–2.23, and g
⊥ = 2.05–2.10). The ESR spectra of acetate and benzoate complexes are like binuclear copper(II) complexes with broad signal (g = 2.2).


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Interest in the synthesis of new binucleating ligands with different donor atoms and flexibility [1–6] attracts the attention of several coordination chemists, because complexes prepared using these ligands emerge with peculiar chemical behaviours mainly due to their application in bioinorganic chemistry, magnetochemistry, electrochemistry, and homogeneous catalysis. This interest has arisen because such ligands can accommodate two metal centers and thus may provide the basis of models for the active sites of biological systems. Several bi- and polynuclear copper containing proteins have been identified such as hemocyanin, tyrosinase, catechol oxidases, ceruloplasmin, laccase, and ascorbate oxidase [7–15]. Understanding the functional and structural properties of binuclear active site by developing small dicopper complexes as models for these metalloproteins is the main aim of the bioinorganic chemist. In physicochemical aspects, these dicopper complexes have noteworthy significance as new inorganic materials capable of showing peculiar magnetic and redox properties and hence these dinuclear copper(II) complexes have wealthy applications in magnetochemistry and homogeneous catalysis [16–20]. In our laboratory we are dealing with binucleating ligands and their metal complexes for more than one decade. So far we have synthesised series of binucleating ligands with phenolic and piperazinyl donor atoms [21–29]. The magnetic and ESR spectral behaviours of the complexes are interesting. The dicopper(II) complexes of the ligand “a” [21, 22] are strongly antiferromagnetic, the complexes of the ligand “b” are weakly antiferromagnetic [23, 24], and the complexes of the ligand “c” are paramagnetic [25] as shown in Scheme 1. The present study deals with the synthesis of similar compounds like “c” in which the two 2-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-(4-methylpiperazinyl)-substituted phenyl residues are separated by a –CH2–N–CH2– fragment instead of methylene group.Scheme 1


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials and Methods

All the chemicals and reagents used in this study were obtained from Merck and Sigma Aldrich. Tetra-N-butyl ammonium perchlorate was purchased from Fluka and recrystallised from ethanol-water mixture (caution: TBAP is potentially explosive; hence, care should be taken in the handling of this compound). HPLC grade dimethylformamide and acetonitrile were obtained from S.D. Fine chemicals.


### 2.2. Physical Measurements

Elemental analyses were carried out by using Carlo Erba model 1106 elemental analyser. Atomic absorption spectra were recorded on Varian AA-200 model atomic absorption spectrophotometer.1H NMR (90 MHz) spectra were recorded in CDCl3 using a FX-90Q Fourier transform NMR spectrometer. 13C-NMR spectra (200 MHz) were recorded on a JEOL model 400 NMR spectrometer and the EI mass spectra were recorded on a JMS DX 303-HF mass spectrometer. IR spectra were recorded on a Hitachi 320 spectrophotometer on KBr disks in the range 250–4000 cm−1. Electronic spectra were recorded on a Hewlett-Packard 8452 A diode array spectrophotometer in the range 250–850 nm. Molar conductivity measurements were measured on an Elico digital conductivity bridge model M88 and conventional cell which was previously calibrated with an aqueous solution of KCl (0.1 N).For cyclic voltammetry, a three-electrode system was used, in which the counter and working electrode were small platinum foils and saturated Ag/AgCl was the reference electrode. TBAP was used as the supporting electrolyte (0.1 M) and all the solutions were around 10−3 M in concentration. The cyclic voltammograms were obtained on an apparatus comprising a PAR model-173 potentiostat/galvanostat, model-175 universal programmer, model-176 coulometer, and a Perkin-Elmer Hitachi (057) X-Y recorder. The measurements were carried out in DMF under oxygen free conditions. Variable temperature magnetic studies were performed on PAR model-155 vibrating sample magnetometer operating at 5000 gauss and the instrument was calibrated with metallic nickel supplied with the instrument. ESR spectra were recorded using a Bruker ER-200D-SRC spectrometer.


### 2.3. Synthesis of the Ligand

The ligands, L1 and L2, were prepared by following a two-step procedure. In the first step N,N-bis[2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl]methylamine (PC1) and N,N-bis[2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl]ethylamine (PC2) were prepared by reacting p-cresol, paraformaldehyde, and primary amines in 2 : 2 : 1 ratio in ethanol medium, by following the literature procedure [30]. In the second step these compounds (PC1 and PC2) were aminoalkylated according to the Mannich reaction with N-methylpiperazine and formalin. The schematic diagram for the synthesis of the ligands and complexes is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Schematic diagram for the synthesis of ligands and complexes.


#### 2.3.1. N,N-Bis[2-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-(4-methylpiperazinomethyl)benzyl]methylamine L1

Paraformaldehyde (0.75 g, 0.025 mol) was taken in 150 mL of glacial acetic acid and allowed to stir for 4 hours. To this N-methylpiperazine (2.3 mL, 0.02 mol) was added and stirring was continued for 24 hours. The N,N-bis[2-hydroxy5-methylbenzyl]methylamine (2.71 g, 0.01 mol) was added and stirred for 48 hours. The resulting solution was kept at 75°C for about 3 hours. It was cooled and neutralised using saturated Na2CO3. A pasty product obtained was thoroughly washed using distilled water. Then it was extracted using dichloromethane (350 mL). The extracted was treated with activated charcoal and filtered. The filtrate was evaporated. A pale yellow oily substrate separated was recrystallised in benzene-ethanol mixture and dried under vacuum. Mp: 71°C. 13C-NMR-(CDCl3/200 MHz/TMS), δ = 15.7, 20.3 (–CH3), 40.6, 53.0, 54.8, 55.6, 57.8, and 60.0 (benzylic carbons), 122.3, 122.5, 124.4, 128.0, 130.7, and 155.5 (aromatic carbons). 1H-NMR (CDCl3/90 MHz/TMS), δ = 1.13 (t, 3H), 2.21 (s, 6H, and N-CH3), 2.26 (s, 6H, and Ar-CH3), 2.52 (br, 16H, and piperazinyl protons), 3.6 (two close singlets, 8H, benzylic), and 6.7–7.0 (m, 4H, and Ar-H). Mass (EI): m/z = 496 (M + 1). Anal. Calcd. for C29H45N5O2 (%): C, 70.3; H, 9.1; N, 14.1. Found: C, 70.1; H, 9.2; N, 14.2.


#### 2.3.2. N,N-Bis[2-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-(4-methyl-piperazinomethyl)benzyl]ethylamine L2

The above procedure was used for the preparation of this compound using N,N-bis[2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl]ethylamine, instead of N,N-bis[2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl]methylamine. Mp: 79°C.13C-NMR-(CDCl3/200 MHz/TMS), δ = 7.3 (ali-CH3), 15.6 and 15.8 (N-CH3 and N-CH2), 20.3 (Ar-CH3), 40.6, 54.6, 55.2, 55.8, 57.8, and 60.1 (benzylic carbons), and 122.3, 122.6, 124.4, 128.1, 130.8, and 155.4 (aromatic carbons). 1H-NMR (CDCl3/90 MHz/TMS), δ = 1.13 (t, 3H, and CH3 of ethyl group), 2.21 (s, 6H, and N-CH3), 2.26 (s, 6H, and Ar-CH3), 2.52 (br, 18H, piperazinyl, and CH2 protons of ethyl group), 3.6 (two close singlets, 8H, and methylene protons), and 6.7–7.0 (m, 4H, and Ar-H). Mass (EI): m/z = 510 (M + 1). Anal. Calcd. for C30H47N5O2 (%): C, 70.7; H, 9.2; N, 13.8. Found: C, 70.7; H, 9.2; N, 13.7.


### 2.4. Synthesis of Copper(II) Complexes

#### 2.4.1. [Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. (1)

To a hot methanol-dichloromethane (2 : 1, 50 : 25 v/v) solution of the ligand L1 (1.0 g, 2 mmol) copper(II) perchlorate hexahydrate (1.48 g, 4 mmol) was added, and the mixture was refluxed on a water bath for 2 hours. Then sodium acetate trihydrate (2.7216 g, 2 mmol) dissolved in minimum amount of water was added and refluxed for one more hour. The resulting solution was filtered and kept at room temperature for few days. The green precipitate separated was filtered off, washed with cold methanol and a little diethyl ether, and dried under vacuum. Yield 1.15 g (70.6%). Anal. Calcd. for C31H50ClCu2 N5O10 (%): C, 45.7; H, 6.1; Cu, 15.6; N, 8.6. Found: C, 45.1; H, 6.0; Cu, 15.5; N, 8.4.


#### 2.4.2. [Cu2L2(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. (2)

The above procedure was used for the preparation of this complex using ligand L2 (1.018 g, 2 mmol) instead of ligand L1. Green solid was obtained. Yield 1.17 g (70%). Anal. Calcd. for C32H52ClCu2N5O10 (%): C, 46.4; H, 6.3; Cu, 15.4; N, 8.4. Found: C, 45.9; H, 6.1; Cu 15.3; N, 8.2.


#### 2.4.3. [Cu2L1(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O. (3) and [Cu2L2(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O. (4)

The procedure used for the preparation of these complexes is same as that of [Cu2L1 (OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. Here sodium benzoate (0.298 g, 2 mmol) was used instead of sodium acetate. The reaction was carried in methanol-dichloromethane mixture. Dark green solid colour was obtained Yield 1.32 g (75.42%) for (3). Anal. Calcd. for C36H52ClCu2N5O10 (%): C, 49.3; H, 5.9; Cu, 14.4; N, 8.0. Found: C, 49.3; H, 5.9; Cu, 14.3; N, 8.0. Dark green solid colour was obtained. Yield 1.40 g (78.6%) for (4). Anal. Calcd. for C37H54ClCu2N5O10 (%): C, 49.9; H, 6.0; Cu, 14.26; N, 7.9. Found: C, 49.6; H, 6.1; Cu, 14.3; N, 7.7.


#### 2.4.4. [Cu2L1(Cl)2]·2H2O. (5)

To a hot methanolic solution (100 mL) of the ligand L1 (1.0 g, 2 mmol) copper(II) chloride dihydrate (3.409 g, 4 mmol) was added to dissolved distilled methanol (50 mL) and the mixture was refluxed on a water bath for 2 hours. The resulting yellowish green solution was evaporated at room temperature for several days, filtered off, washed with water, followed by little diethyl ether, and dried under vacuum. Yellowish green precipitate was obtained. Yield 0.95 g (65.5%). Anal. Calcd. for (5) C29H47Cl2Cu2N5O4 (%): C, 47.9; H, 6.5; Cu, 17.4; N, 9.6. Found: C, 47.8; H, 6.4; Cu, 17.3; N, 9.7.


#### 2.4.5. [Cu2L2(Cl)2]·2H2O.(6)

This complex was prepared by following the above procedure using ligand L2 (1.018 g, 2 mmol) instead of ligand L1. Green solid colour was obtained. Yield 1.05 g (70.9%). Anal. Calcd. for (6) C30H49Cl2Cu2N5O4 (%): C, 48.6; H, 6.6; Cu, 17.4; N, 9.44. Found: C, 48.5; H, 6.6; Cu, 17.3; N, 9.4.


#### 2.4.6. [Cu2L1(ClO4)2]·2H2O. (7)

This complex was prepared by following the procedure adopted for the preparation of (1), and no sodium acetate was added. Dark green solid colour was obtained. Yield 1.21 g (70.8%). Anal. Calcd. For (7) C29H47Cl2Cu2N5O12 (%): C, 40.7; H, 5.5; Cu, 14.9; N, 8.2. Found: C, 40.6; H, 5.4; Cu, 14.8; N, 8.13.


#### 2.4.7. [Cu2L2(ClO4)2]·2H2O. (8)

The above procedure was used, using ligand L2 (1.018 g, 2 mmol) instead of ligand L1. Dark green-coloured product formed was filtered, washed with water, and dried under a vacuum. Yield 1.15 g (66.4%). Anal. Calcd. for (8) C30H49Cl2Cu2N5O12 (%): C, 41.4; H, 5.6; Cu, 14.7; N, 8.1. Found: C, 41.3; H, 5.6; Cu, 14.6; N, 8.0.All these complexes (1–8) are recrystallised and not able to obtain crystals suitable for X-ray studies.


## 2.1. Materials and Methods

All the chemicals and reagents used in this study were obtained from Merck and Sigma Aldrich. Tetra-N-butyl ammonium perchlorate was purchased from Fluka and recrystallised from ethanol-water mixture (caution: TBAP is potentially explosive; hence, care should be taken in the handling of this compound). HPLC grade dimethylformamide and acetonitrile were obtained from S.D. Fine chemicals.


## 2.2. Physical Measurements

Elemental analyses were carried out by using Carlo Erba model 1106 elemental analyser. Atomic absorption spectra were recorded on Varian AA-200 model atomic absorption spectrophotometer.1H NMR (90 MHz) spectra were recorded in CDCl3 using a FX-90Q Fourier transform NMR spectrometer. 13C-NMR spectra (200 MHz) were recorded on a JEOL model 400 NMR spectrometer and the EI mass spectra were recorded on a JMS DX 303-HF mass spectrometer. IR spectra were recorded on a Hitachi 320 spectrophotometer on KBr disks in the range 250–4000 cm−1. Electronic spectra were recorded on a Hewlett-Packard 8452 A diode array spectrophotometer in the range 250–850 nm. Molar conductivity measurements were measured on an Elico digital conductivity bridge model M88 and conventional cell which was previously calibrated with an aqueous solution of KCl (0.1 N).For cyclic voltammetry, a three-electrode system was used, in which the counter and working electrode were small platinum foils and saturated Ag/AgCl was the reference electrode. TBAP was used as the supporting electrolyte (0.1 M) and all the solutions were around 10−3 M in concentration. The cyclic voltammograms were obtained on an apparatus comprising a PAR model-173 potentiostat/galvanostat, model-175 universal programmer, model-176 coulometer, and a Perkin-Elmer Hitachi (057) X-Y recorder. The measurements were carried out in DMF under oxygen free conditions. Variable temperature magnetic studies were performed on PAR model-155 vibrating sample magnetometer operating at 5000 gauss and the instrument was calibrated with metallic nickel supplied with the instrument. ESR spectra were recorded using a Bruker ER-200D-SRC spectrometer.


## 2.3. Synthesis of the Ligand

The ligands, L1 and L2, were prepared by following a two-step procedure. In the first step N,N-bis[2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl]methylamine (PC1) and N,N-bis[2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl]ethylamine (PC2) were prepared by reacting p-cresol, paraformaldehyde, and primary amines in 2 : 2 : 1 ratio in ethanol medium, by following the literature procedure [30]. In the second step these compounds (PC1 and PC2) were aminoalkylated according to the Mannich reaction with N-methylpiperazine and formalin. The schematic diagram for the synthesis of the ligands and complexes is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Schematic diagram for the synthesis of ligands and complexes.


### 2.3.1. N,N-Bis[2-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-(4-methylpiperazinomethyl)benzyl]methylamine L1

Paraformaldehyde (0.75 g, 0.025 mol) was taken in 150 mL of glacial acetic acid and allowed to stir for 4 hours. To this N-methylpiperazine (2.3 mL, 0.02 mol) was added and stirring was continued for 24 hours. The N,N-bis[2-hydroxy5-methylbenzyl]methylamine (2.71 g, 0.01 mol) was added and stirred for 48 hours. The resulting solution was kept at 75°C for about 3 hours. It was cooled and neutralised using saturated Na2CO3. A pasty product obtained was thoroughly washed using distilled water. Then it was extracted using dichloromethane (350 mL). The extracted was treated with activated charcoal and filtered. The filtrate was evaporated. A pale yellow oily substrate separated was recrystallised in benzene-ethanol mixture and dried under vacuum. Mp: 71°C. 13C-NMR-(CDCl3/200 MHz/TMS), δ = 15.7, 20.3 (–CH3), 40.6, 53.0, 54.8, 55.6, 57.8, and 60.0 (benzylic carbons), 122.3, 122.5, 124.4, 128.0, 130.7, and 155.5 (aromatic carbons). 1H-NMR (CDCl3/90 MHz/TMS), δ = 1.13 (t, 3H), 2.21 (s, 6H, and N-CH3), 2.26 (s, 6H, and Ar-CH3), 2.52 (br, 16H, and piperazinyl protons), 3.6 (two close singlets, 8H, benzylic), and 6.7–7.0 (m, 4H, and Ar-H). Mass (EI): m/z = 496 (M + 1). Anal. Calcd. for C29H45N5O2 (%): C, 70.3; H, 9.1; N, 14.1. Found: C, 70.1; H, 9.2; N, 14.2.


### 2.3.2. N,N-Bis[2-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-(4-methyl-piperazinomethyl)benzyl]ethylamine L2

The above procedure was used for the preparation of this compound using N,N-bis[2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl]ethylamine, instead of N,N-bis[2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl]methylamine. Mp: 79°C.13C-NMR-(CDCl3/200 MHz/TMS), δ = 7.3 (ali-CH3), 15.6 and 15.8 (N-CH3 and N-CH2), 20.3 (Ar-CH3), 40.6, 54.6, 55.2, 55.8, 57.8, and 60.1 (benzylic carbons), and 122.3, 122.6, 124.4, 128.1, 130.8, and 155.4 (aromatic carbons). 1H-NMR (CDCl3/90 MHz/TMS), δ = 1.13 (t, 3H, and CH3 of ethyl group), 2.21 (s, 6H, and N-CH3), 2.26 (s, 6H, and Ar-CH3), 2.52 (br, 18H, piperazinyl, and CH2 protons of ethyl group), 3.6 (two close singlets, 8H, and methylene protons), and 6.7–7.0 (m, 4H, and Ar-H). Mass (EI): m/z = 510 (M + 1). Anal. Calcd. for C30H47N5O2 (%): C, 70.7; H, 9.2; N, 13.8. Found: C, 70.7; H, 9.2; N, 13.7.


## 2.3.1. N,N-Bis[2-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-(4-methylpiperazinomethyl)benzyl]methylamine L1

Paraformaldehyde (0.75 g, 0.025 mol) was taken in 150 mL of glacial acetic acid and allowed to stir for 4 hours. To this N-methylpiperazine (2.3 mL, 0.02 mol) was added and stirring was continued for 24 hours. The N,N-bis[2-hydroxy5-methylbenzyl]methylamine (2.71 g, 0.01 mol) was added and stirred for 48 hours. The resulting solution was kept at 75°C for about 3 hours. It was cooled and neutralised using saturated Na2CO3. A pasty product obtained was thoroughly washed using distilled water. Then it was extracted using dichloromethane (350 mL). The extracted was treated with activated charcoal and filtered. The filtrate was evaporated. A pale yellow oily substrate separated was recrystallised in benzene-ethanol mixture and dried under vacuum. Mp: 71°C. 13C-NMR-(CDCl3/200 MHz/TMS), δ = 15.7, 20.3 (–CH3), 40.6, 53.0, 54.8, 55.6, 57.8, and 60.0 (benzylic carbons), 122.3, 122.5, 124.4, 128.0, 130.7, and 155.5 (aromatic carbons). 1H-NMR (CDCl3/90 MHz/TMS), δ = 1.13 (t, 3H), 2.21 (s, 6H, and N-CH3), 2.26 (s, 6H, and Ar-CH3), 2.52 (br, 16H, and piperazinyl protons), 3.6 (two close singlets, 8H, benzylic), and 6.7–7.0 (m, 4H, and Ar-H). Mass (EI): m/z = 496 (M + 1). Anal. Calcd. for C29H45N5O2 (%): C, 70.3; H, 9.1; N, 14.1. Found: C, 70.1; H, 9.2; N, 14.2.


## 2.3.2. N,N-Bis[2-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-(4-methyl-piperazinomethyl)benzyl]ethylamine L2

The above procedure was used for the preparation of this compound using N,N-bis[2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl]ethylamine, instead of N,N-bis[2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl]methylamine. Mp: 79°C.13C-NMR-(CDCl3/200 MHz/TMS), δ = 7.3 (ali-CH3), 15.6 and 15.8 (N-CH3 and N-CH2), 20.3 (Ar-CH3), 40.6, 54.6, 55.2, 55.8, 57.8, and 60.1 (benzylic carbons), and 122.3, 122.6, 124.4, 128.1, 130.8, and 155.4 (aromatic carbons). 1H-NMR (CDCl3/90 MHz/TMS), δ = 1.13 (t, 3H, and CH3 of ethyl group), 2.21 (s, 6H, and N-CH3), 2.26 (s, 6H, and Ar-CH3), 2.52 (br, 18H, piperazinyl, and CH2 protons of ethyl group), 3.6 (two close singlets, 8H, and methylene protons), and 6.7–7.0 (m, 4H, and Ar-H). Mass (EI): m/z = 510 (M + 1). Anal. Calcd. for C30H47N5O2 (%): C, 70.7; H, 9.2; N, 13.8. Found: C, 70.7; H, 9.2; N, 13.7.


## 2.4. Synthesis of Copper(II) Complexes

### 2.4.1. [Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. (1)

To a hot methanol-dichloromethane (2 : 1, 50 : 25 v/v) solution of the ligand L1 (1.0 g, 2 mmol) copper(II) perchlorate hexahydrate (1.48 g, 4 mmol) was added, and the mixture was refluxed on a water bath for 2 hours. Then sodium acetate trihydrate (2.7216 g, 2 mmol) dissolved in minimum amount of water was added and refluxed for one more hour. The resulting solution was filtered and kept at room temperature for few days. The green precipitate separated was filtered off, washed with cold methanol and a little diethyl ether, and dried under vacuum. Yield 1.15 g (70.6%). Anal. Calcd. for C31H50ClCu2 N5O10 (%): C, 45.7; H, 6.1; Cu, 15.6; N, 8.6. Found: C, 45.1; H, 6.0; Cu, 15.5; N, 8.4.


### 2.4.2. [Cu2L2(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. (2)

The above procedure was used for the preparation of this complex using ligand L2 (1.018 g, 2 mmol) instead of ligand L1. Green solid was obtained. Yield 1.17 g (70%). Anal. Calcd. for C32H52ClCu2N5O10 (%): C, 46.4; H, 6.3; Cu, 15.4; N, 8.4. Found: C, 45.9; H, 6.1; Cu 15.3; N, 8.2.


### 2.4.3. [Cu2L1(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O. (3) and [Cu2L2(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O. (4)

The procedure used for the preparation of these complexes is same as that of [Cu2L1 (OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. Here sodium benzoate (0.298 g, 2 mmol) was used instead of sodium acetate. The reaction was carried in methanol-dichloromethane mixture. Dark green solid colour was obtained Yield 1.32 g (75.42%) for (3). Anal. Calcd. for C36H52ClCu2N5O10 (%): C, 49.3; H, 5.9; Cu, 14.4; N, 8.0. Found: C, 49.3; H, 5.9; Cu, 14.3; N, 8.0. Dark green solid colour was obtained. Yield 1.40 g (78.6%) for (4). Anal. Calcd. for C37H54ClCu2N5O10 (%): C, 49.9; H, 6.0; Cu, 14.26; N, 7.9. Found: C, 49.6; H, 6.1; Cu, 14.3; N, 7.7.


### 2.4.4. [Cu2L1(Cl)2]·2H2O. (5)

To a hot methanolic solution (100 mL) of the ligand L1 (1.0 g, 2 mmol) copper(II) chloride dihydrate (3.409 g, 4 mmol) was added to dissolved distilled methanol (50 mL) and the mixture was refluxed on a water bath for 2 hours. The resulting yellowish green solution was evaporated at room temperature for several days, filtered off, washed with water, followed by little diethyl ether, and dried under vacuum. Yellowish green precipitate was obtained. Yield 0.95 g (65.5%). Anal. Calcd. for (5) C29H47Cl2Cu2N5O4 (%): C, 47.9; H, 6.5; Cu, 17.4; N, 9.6. Found: C, 47.8; H, 6.4; Cu, 17.3; N, 9.7.


### 2.4.5. [Cu2L2(Cl)2]·2H2O.(6)

This complex was prepared by following the above procedure using ligand L2 (1.018 g, 2 mmol) instead of ligand L1. Green solid colour was obtained. Yield 1.05 g (70.9%). Anal. Calcd. for (6) C30H49Cl2Cu2N5O4 (%): C, 48.6; H, 6.6; Cu, 17.4; N, 9.44. Found: C, 48.5; H, 6.6; Cu, 17.3; N, 9.4.


### 2.4.6. [Cu2L1(ClO4)2]·2H2O. (7)

This complex was prepared by following the procedure adopted for the preparation of (1), and no sodium acetate was added. Dark green solid colour was obtained. Yield 1.21 g (70.8%). Anal. Calcd. For (7) C29H47Cl2Cu2N5O12 (%): C, 40.7; H, 5.5; Cu, 14.9; N, 8.2. Found: C, 40.6; H, 5.4; Cu, 14.8; N, 8.13.


### 2.4.7. [Cu2L2(ClO4)2]·2H2O. (8)

The above procedure was used, using ligand L2 (1.018 g, 2 mmol) instead of ligand L1. Dark green-coloured product formed was filtered, washed with water, and dried under a vacuum. Yield 1.15 g (66.4%). Anal. Calcd. for (8) C30H49Cl2Cu2N5O12 (%): C, 41.4; H, 5.6; Cu, 14.7; N, 8.1. Found: C, 41.3; H, 5.6; Cu, 14.6; N, 8.0.All these complexes (1–8) are recrystallised and not able to obtain crystals suitable for X-ray studies.


## 2.4.1. [Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. (1)

To a hot methanol-dichloromethane (2 : 1, 50 : 25 v/v) solution of the ligand L1 (1.0 g, 2 mmol) copper(II) perchlorate hexahydrate (1.48 g, 4 mmol) was added, and the mixture was refluxed on a water bath for 2 hours. Then sodium acetate trihydrate (2.7216 g, 2 mmol) dissolved in minimum amount of water was added and refluxed for one more hour. The resulting solution was filtered and kept at room temperature for few days. The green precipitate separated was filtered off, washed with cold methanol and a little diethyl ether, and dried under vacuum. Yield 1.15 g (70.6%). Anal. Calcd. for C31H50ClCu2 N5O10 (%): C, 45.7; H, 6.1; Cu, 15.6; N, 8.6. Found: C, 45.1; H, 6.0; Cu, 15.5; N, 8.4.


## 2.4.2. [Cu2L2(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. (2)

The above procedure was used for the preparation of this complex using ligand L2 (1.018 g, 2 mmol) instead of ligand L1. Green solid was obtained. Yield 1.17 g (70%). Anal. Calcd. for C32H52ClCu2N5O10 (%): C, 46.4; H, 6.3; Cu, 15.4; N, 8.4. Found: C, 45.9; H, 6.1; Cu 15.3; N, 8.2.


## 2.4.3. [Cu2L1(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O. (3) and [Cu2L2(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O. (4)

The procedure used for the preparation of these complexes is same as that of [Cu2L1 (OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. Here sodium benzoate (0.298 g, 2 mmol) was used instead of sodium acetate. The reaction was carried in methanol-dichloromethane mixture. Dark green solid colour was obtained Yield 1.32 g (75.42%) for (3). Anal. Calcd. for C36H52ClCu2N5O10 (%): C, 49.3; H, 5.9; Cu, 14.4; N, 8.0. Found: C, 49.3; H, 5.9; Cu, 14.3; N, 8.0. Dark green solid colour was obtained. Yield 1.40 g (78.6%) for (4). Anal. Calcd. for C37H54ClCu2N5O10 (%): C, 49.9; H, 6.0; Cu, 14.26; N, 7.9. Found: C, 49.6; H, 6.1; Cu, 14.3; N, 7.7.


## 2.4.4. [Cu2L1(Cl)2]·2H2O. (5)

To a hot methanolic solution (100 mL) of the ligand L1 (1.0 g, 2 mmol) copper(II) chloride dihydrate (3.409 g, 4 mmol) was added to dissolved distilled methanol (50 mL) and the mixture was refluxed on a water bath for 2 hours. The resulting yellowish green solution was evaporated at room temperature for several days, filtered off, washed with water, followed by little diethyl ether, and dried under vacuum. Yellowish green precipitate was obtained. Yield 0.95 g (65.5%). Anal. Calcd. for (5) C29H47Cl2Cu2N5O4 (%): C, 47.9; H, 6.5; Cu, 17.4; N, 9.6. Found: C, 47.8; H, 6.4; Cu, 17.3; N, 9.7.


## 2.4.5. [Cu2L2(Cl)2]·2H2O.(6)

This complex was prepared by following the above procedure using ligand L2 (1.018 g, 2 mmol) instead of ligand L1. Green solid colour was obtained. Yield 1.05 g (70.9%). Anal. Calcd. for (6) C30H49Cl2Cu2N5O4 (%): C, 48.6; H, 6.6; Cu, 17.4; N, 9.44. Found: C, 48.5; H, 6.6; Cu, 17.3; N, 9.4.


## 2.4.6. [Cu2L1(ClO4)2]·2H2O. (7)

This complex was prepared by following the procedure adopted for the preparation of (1), and no sodium acetate was added. Dark green solid colour was obtained. Yield 1.21 g (70.8%). Anal. Calcd. For (7) C29H47Cl2Cu2N5O12 (%): C, 40.7; H, 5.5; Cu, 14.9; N, 8.2. Found: C, 40.6; H, 5.4; Cu, 14.8; N, 8.13.


## 2.4.7. [Cu2L2(ClO4)2]·2H2O. (8)

The above procedure was used, using ligand L2 (1.018 g, 2 mmol) instead of ligand L1. Dark green-coloured product formed was filtered, washed with water, and dried under a vacuum. Yield 1.15 g (66.4%). Anal. Calcd. for (8) C30H49Cl2Cu2N5O12 (%): C, 41.4; H, 5.6; Cu, 14.7; N, 8.1. Found: C, 41.3; H, 5.6; Cu, 14.6; N, 8.0.All these complexes (1–8) are recrystallised and not able to obtain crystals suitable for X-ray studies.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The ligands (L1 and L2) were characterised by analytical method and mass spectral studies. In the 1H-NMR spectra the peaks for aromatic hydrogens appear around δ = 6.7–7.0, benzylic protons appear around δ = 3.6, N-methyl of the piperazine residue and aromatic methyl protons appear around δ = 2.2, piperazinyl protons appear as a broad peak in the region δ = 2.5, and the aliphatic methyl protons appear at δ = 1.13. In the 13C-NMR, signals for the aliphatic carbon atoms were observed in the region δ = 7 to 61, and the signals for the aromatic carbon atoms were observed in the region δ = 121 to 156. The IR spectra of all the complexes show broad bands in the region around 3450 cm−1 indicating the presence of coordinated or lattice water in the complexes [25, 26]. Characteristic peak for acetate was observed at 1540 cm−1 and peak for the perchlorate anion was observed at 1100 cm−1.


### 3.1. Electronic Spectra

Electronic spectra of all the complexes were studied in methanolic medium, and the data are summarised in Table1. For dicopper complexes, the absorption spectra exhibit three main features, two high energy intense peaks below 300 nm assigned to the intraligand charge transfer transitions (LLCT), a peak or shoulder around 400 nm (ε
≈ 2000 dm3mol−1) due to phenolate to copper charge transfer transitions (LMCT) [31–34], and weak band around 630–670 nm (ε
≈ 300 dm3mol−1) for the usual copper d-d transitions.Table 1
Electronic spectral data for the complexes (in methanol).
No.
Complexes
d-d
LMCT
LLCT
[
λ
max (nm)  (ε, M−1 cm−1)]
1
[Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O
650 (184)
388 (1270)
288 (15 800)248 (19 500)
2
[Cu2L2(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O
664 (297)
436 (1330)
288 (15 500)246 (19 700)
3
[Cu2L1(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O
650 (143)
390 (687)
292 (10 900)242 (18 600)
4
[Cu2L2(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O
645 (220)
396 (1200)
287 (15 200)248 (17 200)
5
[Cu2L1Cl2
]·2H2O
650 (290)
420 (1310)
284 (14 100)244 (19 800)
6
[Cu2L2Cl2
]·2H2O
638 (249)
412 (540)
286 (12 500)238 (13 000)
7
[Cu2L1(ClO4)2
]·2H2O
657 (208)
405 (sh)
287 (14 700)235 (16 300)
8
[Cu2L2(ClO4)2
]·2H2O
658 (192)
410 (sh)
285 (13 300)234 (14 900)
CT: charge transfer, Sh: shoulder.


### 3.2. Electrochemistry

The electrochemical behaviour of the complexes was studied by cyclic voltammetry and the electrochemical data such as cathodic peak potential (E
p
c), anodic peak potential (E
p
a), peak separation (Δ
E
p), and redox potential E
1
/
2 are given in Table 2. The typical cyclic voltammogram for the complexes 2 and 8 is given in Figure 2. The cyclic voltammogram of the complexes bridged by acetate and benzoate exogenous donor atoms shows two well defined quasi-reversible redox waves in the potential range −0.2 to −1.2 V. However, for the chloro and perchlorate complexes only one redox wave in the potential range −0.55 to −0.75 V was observed. In order to ascertain the mechanism of the electrochemical reduction, coulometric measurement was carried out. At a potential −1.10 V, the acetate and benzoate complexes consumed 2 electrons per mole of the complexes (n
=
1.94) and at a potential −0.70 V the complexes consumed only one electron (n
=
0.95) per molecule, which indicate that the involvement of two single electron transfers in the reduction processes of these complexes. Based on the coulometric results, the two reduction peaks observed in the cyclic voltammograms are attributed to the two stepwise one electron transfers as observed in several binuclear copper(II) complexes [30, 35]. Consider
(1)
Cu
(
II
)
Cu
(
II
)
⇌
e
-
Cu
(
II
)
Cu
(
I
)
⇌
e
-
Cu
(
I
)
Cu
(
I
)
.Table 2
Electrochemical data for the complexes (in dmfa).
No.
Complexes
E
1 pc/v
E
1 pa/v
E
1
/
2
1/v (Δ
E/mv)
E
2 pc/v
E
2 pa/v
E
1
/
2
2/V (Δ
E/mv)
1
[Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O
−0.52
−0.36
−0.44 (160)
−0.94
−0.70
0.82 (240)
2
[Cu2L2(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O
−0.58
−0.42
−0.50 (160)
−0.91
−0.75
−0.80 (160)
3
[Cu2L1(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O
−0.50
−0.34
−0.42 (160)
−0.98
−0.74
−0.86 (240)
4
[Cu2L2(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O
−0.48
−0.32
−0.40 (160)
−1.02
−0.88
−0.85 (140)
5
[Cu2L1Cl2
]·2H2O
−0.66
−0.52
−0.59 (140)
—
—
—
6
[Cu2L2Cl2
]·2H2O
−0.72
−0.50
−0.61 (220)
—
—
—
7
[Cu2L1(ClO4)2
]·2H2O
−0.68
−0.50
−0.59 (180)
—
—
—
8
[Cu2L2(ClO4)2
]·2H2O
−0.70
−0.48
−0.59 (220)
—
—
—
aPotential V versus SCE. Conditions: Pt working and SCE reference electrodes;
supporting electrolyte: TBAP; concentration: complex (1
×
10
-
3 M), TBAP (1
×
10
-
1 M).Cyclic voltammogram for the complexes (a) [Cu2L2(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. (2) and (b) [Cu2L2(ClO4)2]·2H2O. (6).
(a)
(b)The coulometric studies of the chloro and perchlorate bridged complexes at a –0.85 V indicate that the complexes consumed two electrons per molecule (n
=
1.86), showing typical electrochemical behaviour of remote donor set copper(II) complexes [36, 37]. Consider
(2)
Cu
(
II
)
Cu
(
II
)
⇌
2
e
-
Cu
(
I
)
Cu
(
I
)
.A comparison of the reduction potentials of the complexes of a particular ligand indicates that the reduction potential is exogenous bridging donor dependent. Acetate and benzoate bridged complexes undergo two-step single electron transfer, whereas chloro and perchlorate complexes undergo single step two-electron transfer.


### 3.3. Magnetochemistry

Room temperature as well as variable temperature (77–300 K) magnetic studies were performed for all the complexes, and the magnetic data are given in Table3. The magnetic data obtained from variable temperature magnetic studies were fitted to the modified Bleaney-Bowers equation [38, 39] to evaluate the singlet-triplet energy separation (−2 J). Consider
(3)
χ
m
=
(
N
g
2
β
2
3
k
T
)
[
3
+
exp
(
-
2
J
k
T
)
]
-
1
(
1
-
p
)
+
0.45
p
T
+
N
α
,
where χ
m is the molar magnetic susceptibility, p is the percentage of monomeric impurities, and other symbols have their usual meanings. N
α has been fixed at 120 × 10−6cm3mol−1 and based on ESR studies; g was fixed as 2.20 for all magnetic simulations. −2 J values were evaluated by a nonlinear regression analysis in which −2 J and p are the variables. The variation of the magnetic properties with temperature is given in Figure 3.Table 3
ESR spectral and magnetic data for the complexesa.
No.
Complexes
μ
β/Cu at 298 K
−2 J/cm−1
g-values
P
A
g from ESR
g
∥
g
⊥
1
[Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O
1.56
26
2.20
0.003
—
—
—
2
[Cu2L2(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O
1.52
38
2.20
0.003
—
—
—
3
[Cu2L1(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O
1.45
53
2.20
0.001
—
—
—
4
[Cu2L2(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O
1.50
48
2.20
0.002
—
—
—
5
[Cu2L1Cl2
]·2H2O
1.72
—
—
—
165
2.17
2.05
6
[Cu2L2Cl2
]·2H2O
1.73
—
—
—
170
2.23
2.10
7
[Cu2L1(ClO4)2
]·2H2O
1.71
—
—
—
160
2.20
2.10
8
[Cu2L2(ClO4)2
]·2H2O
1.72
—
—
—
160
2.22
2.09
a
N
α has been fixed as 120
×
10
-
6 cm3/mole for all magnetic simulations.Figure 3
Temperature dependence magnetic properties of the complex [Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O· (1).The room temperature magnetic moment value of the complexes1–4 shows lower μ
β/Cu values (−2 J around 25 to 40 cm−1 for acetate, −2 J around 45 to 55 cm−1 for benzoate complexes) than the spin only value, but for the complexes 5–8 it shows that μ
β/Cu values are close to the spin only values.


### 3.4. ESR Spectra

Both room temperature and liquid nitrogen temperature ESR spectra of the complexes were recorded in DMF and theg-values were evaluated using the relationship h
ν
=
g
β
H shown in Table 3. The ESR spectra of the complexes 1 and 8 are shown in Figure 4. In the room temperature ESR spectra, the complexes 1–4 show a broad band centered at g-2.20, but the complexes 5–8 show poorly resolved hyperfine splitting signals (
g
∥ = 2.17 – 2.23 and g
⊥
=
2.05 to 2.10) which are typical of mono nuclearcopper(II) complexes and no change in the intensity of the signal at liquid nitrogen temperature was observed [25, 26, 36].Figure 4
ESR Spectra for the complexes (a) [Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. (1) and (b) [Cu2L2(ClO4)2]·2H2O. (8).


## 3.1. Electronic Spectra

Electronic spectra of all the complexes were studied in methanolic medium, and the data are summarised in Table1. For dicopper complexes, the absorption spectra exhibit three main features, two high energy intense peaks below 300 nm assigned to the intraligand charge transfer transitions (LLCT), a peak or shoulder around 400 nm (ε
≈ 2000 dm3mol−1) due to phenolate to copper charge transfer transitions (LMCT) [31–34], and weak band around 630–670 nm (ε
≈ 300 dm3mol−1) for the usual copper d-d transitions.Table 1
Electronic spectral data for the complexes (in methanol).
No.
Complexes
d-d
LMCT
LLCT
[
λ
max (nm)  (ε, M−1 cm−1)]
1
[Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O
650 (184)
388 (1270)
288 (15 800)248 (19 500)
2
[Cu2L2(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O
664 (297)
436 (1330)
288 (15 500)246 (19 700)
3
[Cu2L1(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O
650 (143)
390 (687)
292 (10 900)242 (18 600)
4
[Cu2L2(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O
645 (220)
396 (1200)
287 (15 200)248 (17 200)
5
[Cu2L1Cl2
]·2H2O
650 (290)
420 (1310)
284 (14 100)244 (19 800)
6
[Cu2L2Cl2
]·2H2O
638 (249)
412 (540)
286 (12 500)238 (13 000)
7
[Cu2L1(ClO4)2
]·2H2O
657 (208)
405 (sh)
287 (14 700)235 (16 300)
8
[Cu2L2(ClO4)2
]·2H2O
658 (192)
410 (sh)
285 (13 300)234 (14 900)
CT: charge transfer, Sh: shoulder.


## 3.2. Electrochemistry

The electrochemical behaviour of the complexes was studied by cyclic voltammetry and the electrochemical data such as cathodic peak potential (E
p
c), anodic peak potential (E
p
a), peak separation (Δ
E
p), and redox potential E
1
/
2 are given in Table 2. The typical cyclic voltammogram for the complexes 2 and 8 is given in Figure 2. The cyclic voltammogram of the complexes bridged by acetate and benzoate exogenous donor atoms shows two well defined quasi-reversible redox waves in the potential range −0.2 to −1.2 V. However, for the chloro and perchlorate complexes only one redox wave in the potential range −0.55 to −0.75 V was observed. In order to ascertain the mechanism of the electrochemical reduction, coulometric measurement was carried out. At a potential −1.10 V, the acetate and benzoate complexes consumed 2 electrons per mole of the complexes (n
=
1.94) and at a potential −0.70 V the complexes consumed only one electron (n
=
0.95) per molecule, which indicate that the involvement of two single electron transfers in the reduction processes of these complexes. Based on the coulometric results, the two reduction peaks observed in the cyclic voltammograms are attributed to the two stepwise one electron transfers as observed in several binuclear copper(II) complexes [30, 35]. Consider
(1)
Cu
(
II
)
Cu
(
II
)
⇌
e
-
Cu
(
II
)
Cu
(
I
)
⇌
e
-
Cu
(
I
)
Cu
(
I
)
.Table 2
Electrochemical data for the complexes (in dmfa).
No.
Complexes
E
1 pc/v
E
1 pa/v
E
1
/
2
1/v (Δ
E/mv)
E
2 pc/v
E
2 pa/v
E
1
/
2
2/V (Δ
E/mv)
1
[Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O
−0.52
−0.36
−0.44 (160)
−0.94
−0.70
0.82 (240)
2
[Cu2L2(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O
−0.58
−0.42
−0.50 (160)
−0.91
−0.75
−0.80 (160)
3
[Cu2L1(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O
−0.50
−0.34
−0.42 (160)
−0.98
−0.74
−0.86 (240)
4
[Cu2L2(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O
−0.48
−0.32
−0.40 (160)
−1.02
−0.88
−0.85 (140)
5
[Cu2L1Cl2
]·2H2O
−0.66
−0.52
−0.59 (140)
—
—
—
6
[Cu2L2Cl2
]·2H2O
−0.72
−0.50
−0.61 (220)
—
—
—
7
[Cu2L1(ClO4)2
]·2H2O
−0.68
−0.50
−0.59 (180)
—
—
—
8
[Cu2L2(ClO4)2
]·2H2O
−0.70
−0.48
−0.59 (220)
—
—
—
aPotential V versus SCE. Conditions: Pt working and SCE reference electrodes;
supporting electrolyte: TBAP; concentration: complex (1
×
10
-
3 M), TBAP (1
×
10
-
1 M).Cyclic voltammogram for the complexes (a) [Cu2L2(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. (2) and (b) [Cu2L2(ClO4)2]·2H2O. (6).
(a)
(b)The coulometric studies of the chloro and perchlorate bridged complexes at a –0.85 V indicate that the complexes consumed two electrons per molecule (n
=
1.86), showing typical electrochemical behaviour of remote donor set copper(II) complexes [36, 37]. Consider
(2)
Cu
(
II
)
Cu
(
II
)
⇌
2
e
-
Cu
(
I
)
Cu
(
I
)
.A comparison of the reduction potentials of the complexes of a particular ligand indicates that the reduction potential is exogenous bridging donor dependent. Acetate and benzoate bridged complexes undergo two-step single electron transfer, whereas chloro and perchlorate complexes undergo single step two-electron transfer.


## 3.3. Magnetochemistry

Room temperature as well as variable temperature (77–300 K) magnetic studies were performed for all the complexes, and the magnetic data are given in Table3. The magnetic data obtained from variable temperature magnetic studies were fitted to the modified Bleaney-Bowers equation [38, 39] to evaluate the singlet-triplet energy separation (−2 J). Consider
(3)
χ
m
=
(
N
g
2
β
2
3
k
T
)
[
3
+
exp
(
-
2
J
k
T
)
]
-
1
(
1
-
p
)
+
0.45
p
T
+
N
α
,
where χ
m is the molar magnetic susceptibility, p is the percentage of monomeric impurities, and other symbols have their usual meanings. N
α has been fixed at 120 × 10−6cm3mol−1 and based on ESR studies; g was fixed as 2.20 for all magnetic simulations. −2 J values were evaluated by a nonlinear regression analysis in which −2 J and p are the variables. The variation of the magnetic properties with temperature is given in Figure 3.Table 3
ESR spectral and magnetic data for the complexesa.
No.
Complexes
μ
β/Cu at 298 K
−2 J/cm−1
g-values
P
A
g from ESR
g
∥
g
⊥
1
[Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O
1.56
26
2.20
0.003
—
—
—
2
[Cu2L2(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O
1.52
38
2.20
0.003
—
—
—
3
[Cu2L1(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O
1.45
53
2.20
0.001
—
—
—
4
[Cu2L2(Benz)]ClO4·2H2O
1.50
48
2.20
0.002
—
—
—
5
[Cu2L1Cl2
]·2H2O
1.72
—
—
—
165
2.17
2.05
6
[Cu2L2Cl2
]·2H2O
1.73
—
—
—
170
2.23
2.10
7
[Cu2L1(ClO4)2
]·2H2O
1.71
—
—
—
160
2.20
2.10
8
[Cu2L2(ClO4)2
]·2H2O
1.72
—
—
—
160
2.22
2.09
a
N
α has been fixed as 120
×
10
-
6 cm3/mole for all magnetic simulations.Figure 3
Temperature dependence magnetic properties of the complex [Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O· (1).The room temperature magnetic moment value of the complexes1–4 shows lower μ
β/Cu values (−2 J around 25 to 40 cm−1 for acetate, −2 J around 45 to 55 cm−1 for benzoate complexes) than the spin only value, but for the complexes 5–8 it shows that μ
β/Cu values are close to the spin only values.


## 3.4. ESR Spectra

Both room temperature and liquid nitrogen temperature ESR spectra of the complexes were recorded in DMF and theg-values were evaluated using the relationship h
ν
=
g
β
H shown in Table 3. The ESR spectra of the complexes 1 and 8 are shown in Figure 4. In the room temperature ESR spectra, the complexes 1–4 show a broad band centered at g-2.20, but the complexes 5–8 show poorly resolved hyperfine splitting signals (
g
∥ = 2.17 – 2.23 and g
⊥
=
2.05 to 2.10) which are typical of mono nuclearcopper(II) complexes and no change in the intensity of the signal at liquid nitrogen temperature was observed [25, 26, 36].Figure 4
ESR Spectra for the complexes (a) [Cu2L1(OAc)]ClO4·2H2O. (1) and (b) [Cu2L2(ClO4)2]·2H2O. (8).


## 4. Conclusion

Comparison of the coulometric, magnetic, and ESR spectral studies indicates that, in the complexes, the chemical behaviour varies depending upon the nature of the exogenous donor atoms. The electrochemical studies of these complexes indicate that all the complexes undergo quasi-reversible reduction at negative potential in the range ofE
=
-
0.48 to −1.20 V. The acetate and benzoate exogenous ligand complexes behave like a bridged binuclear system due to the presence of O–C–O bridging unit. Chloro and perchlorate ligand complexes do not form bridged binuclear complexes because of weak bridging capabilities of these ligands. Magnetic properties of these complexes indicate that there is a interaction for acetate and benzoate bridged complexes and there is no exchange interaction for chloro and perchlorate complexes. All these data indicate that the chloro and perchlorate complexes are not bridged, but the acetate and benzoate complexes are bridged.Comparison of the chemical behaviour of the complexes ofc with the present ligand d is also interesting. The unit which unites the two 2-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-(4-methyl-piperazinyl)-substituted phenyl residues in c is –CH2 and in d the unit is –CH2–N–CH2. The X-ray structures of the ligand c and similar compound of PC of ligand b are relatively that of ligand d[19, 21]. In c both units are anti, therefore there is no possibility to form bridged binuclear complexes, but in d the two phenolic residues are cis, and the flexibility of the –CH2–N–CH2– linkage may allow the molecules to come closer in the complexes of the ligand d, leading to weak interaction between the copper atoms, and in the case of ligand such as chloride or perchlorate, formation of a bridge between the two copper atoms seems to be not possible; hence, they behave as mononuclear complexes.



---

*Source: 461546-2014-01-02.xml*