# A Dual-Broadband Printed Dipole Antenna for 2G/3G/4G Base Station Applications

Authors: XiongZhi Zhu; JinLing Zhang; Tong Cui; ZhanQi Zheng
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

A new dual-broadband printed dipole antenna for base station applications is proposed in this communication. This antenna has three different dipoles with the same feed point and an extra parasitic strip. The two arms of the three dipoles are printed on opposite sides of the substrate and symmetrical on the centerline, but the parasitic strip at the end of the dipole is just put on one side. Besides, a U-shaped reflector is designed at the bottom of the antenna to realize good radiation characteristics in the working frequency. The simulated and measured results show good agreement. The two studied bands are both broadened which, respectively, achieve 36.7% (690–1000MHz) and 47.3% (1710–2770MHz) for the lower and higher bands so as to satisfy the 2G/3G/4G wireless communication, and the corresponding gains of 4-5dBi and 5-6dBi are also obtained.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

With the development of the wireless communication, the requirement of the bandwidth of the antenna for the base station applications becomes more and more wide. This trend is so clear from its development process; the bands of 690-960MHz and the 1710-1850MHz were used for the 2G systems, and the band was broadened to be 265MHz from 1880 to 2145MHz for 3G communication, and then the wider bands of both the 1745-1900 MHz and the 2300MHz-2655MHz were developed for 4G systems [1–3]. Nowadays, to integrate easily, the antenna covering all the bands of 2G/3G/4G has attracted researchers’ interest which should have the bands 32% (690-960MHz) and 45% (1710-2700MHz). This can reduce the number of antenna units, the complexity of RF, and minimization of the installation area, and they are also able to support multistandard system.Several such dual-broadband antennas have been reported [4–7], where both the three-dimensional and the irregular multimetal structures were adopted for the lower and upper bands, respectively. To do this, the antenna would have complex resonant and feed structures so that the increase of both the large volume and the difficulties for the fabrication. In contrast, only in [8] the antenna had a simple planar microstrip structure to cover all frequencies. However, the upper and the lower-band elements were independent and then dual port feedings were required, and an extra power divider was designed to feed the two elements of the upper-band section. On the other hand, the gating lobe appeared when the frequency is higher than 2500MHz. Some other antennas were studied as well in [9–14], which only cover part of the 2G/3G/4G bands.In this paper, a dual-band broadband printed dipole with only one feed for the base station applications is proposed whose –10 dB impedance bandwidths are 36.7% (690-1000MHz) and 47.3% (1710-2770MHz) for the lower and the upper bands, respectively. Here, several different series-fed dipoles were designed to realize the dual-broadband characteristics. And owing to the double-side symmetrical structure, the strip dipoles excitation can be easily reversed so that the corresponding two bands can be adjusted independently without influencing each other, and both the stable half-power beamwidth and the good cross-polarization discrimination are obtained over the entire operating frequency. Structures of all patches of the antenna are simple rectangular patches, which are fabricated by printing circuit board (PCB) processing, and only one feed port is needed. It has obvious advantages of simple structure and easy to fabricate at low cost.


## 2. Design of A Dual-Broadband Printed Dipole Antenna

### 2.1. Configuration

The top view of basic geometry of the proposed antenna is shown in Figure1. The solid line in Figure 1(a) represents the outline of the front patch and the dashed line in Figure 1(b) represents the outline of the patch on the back side. They are in an axisymmetric structure and all the sizes are the same, except for the independent printed parasitic patch. It clearly presents the three series-fed printed strip dipoles and an extra printed parasitic patch. The three printed strip dipoles of different lengths, with the arms printed on opposite sides of the dielectric substrate, are connected through a parallel stripline. The parallel stripline consists of two broadside-coupled strips with a width ofWp. The antenna is fed by a conventional coaxial connector through a matched transmission line. The extra parasitic patch is designed at the end of the antenna and is fed by the terminal printed strip dipoles.Figure 1
The top view of the proposed antenna. (a) Front. (b) Back.
(a) (b)In this design, the widthWp of the feeding strip is kept the same, and the total length is mainly determined by the distancesd1 andd2 to decrease the mutual couplings. The radiation of the antenna is divided into two parts, the shorter dipoles with lengthsL3 andL4 are responsible for the higher frequencies while the longer lengthL1 is for the lower frequency, and the parasitic patch is used to broaden the bandwidth of the lower frequency with the longer dipole. In order to reduce the size of the antenna, a folded part vertical to the dipole is added to the longest dipole whose length isH1, and thus the total length of the lower-band antenna becomesL1+H1+H1. Besides, the width of the longest dipole is studied asW1 considering the impedance matching. The parameters of the related parasitic patch to the longest dipole are lengthL2, widthW2, and the distance between the parasitic patch and the dipoled2. After using the parasitic element, the bandwidth is broadened about three times.On the other hand, the upper frequency band is provided by the two sets of upper-band dipoles. To achieve broadband work for high frequency segments, the resonant frequency of the shorter dipole is higher than the nominal center frequency of the high frequency band while the longer one generates the lower part. But both dipoles can radiate effectively in the upper-band. These corresponding parameters areL3 andW3 andL4 andW4 for the shorter and longer dipoles, respectively. The distance between the two dipoles isd3, and the dipoles are directly connected by the parallel stripline. By increasing the length difference of the two dipoles and selecting an optimal distance between them, the widest bandwidth can be obtained for the antenna [15]. Meanwhile, the distance between the upper-band diploe and the bottom of the antenna isd4.The line polarity between the lower-band dipole and the upper-band dipoles is reversed and the antenna fed is at the longer element of the upper-band dipoles through a matched transmission line at the end of the antenna. All of the printed strip dipoles are directly connected by a parallel stripline, and the corresponding phases of current of the connecting stripline are delayed sequentially resulting in end-fire radiation in the direction of propagation. This structure can achieve wideband impedance characteristics and operate at two frequency bands that are relatively far apart.As we know, each dipole generates omnidirectional radiation at its H-plane. However, in this design the radiation of one dipole directed to the other two will distort. Thus, to realize the directional radiation, a U-shaped reflector is designed to reflect the electromagnetic wave of the dipoles as shown in Figure2. It shows that the bottom of the reflector is vertical to the substrate, and the direction is parallel to that of the width of the substrate. The tilt angle between the bottom and tilt side should be adjusted carefully to get the good radiation in the whole frequency band. Finally, the optimized parameters of the antenna including those of the reflector are listed in Table 1.Table 1
The optimized parameters of the antenna and the reflector.
Parameter Value Parameter Value L 1 140mm W p 2mm L 2 112mm d 1 122mm L 3 40mm d 2 4mm L 4 64mm d 3 27mm L m 33mm d 4 40mm W 1 6mm H 1 23mm W 2 4mm W r 47mm W 3 8mm L r 63mm W 4 8mm H r 10mm W m 4mm θ 70°Figure 2
The antenna and the shaped reflector.


### 2.2. Parametric Study

To get good impedance matching, many parameters of the dipoles should be considered, especially for the lengthsL1 andL2, the length difference Ld betweenL3 andL4, and the distanced3. Their influences are obtained by the 3D electromagnetic package High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS) and discussed as follows. The parameters in the following discussions are consistent with that in Table 1; that is, we just change the discussed parameter and keep the rest.Figure3 shows the influence of differentL1 on the S-parameter. It can be clearly seen that the lower-band diploe only affects the lowest frequency response of the antenna and remains stable in the high frequency band. Moreover, the increase of the lower-band diploe leads to the decrease of resonance frequency and the antenna becomes mismatched whenL1 is longer than 148 mm.Figure 3
S-parameter versus frequency with differentL1.The influence of the parasitic patch lengthL2 is shown in Figure 4. Its influence on the bandwidth is so obvious; if the is no parasitic patch, the bandwidth of lower frequency is only 70MHz, but it becomes 310MHz (690-1000MHz) after adding the parasitic strip because an additional resonance is introduced then in the low frequency to widen the original bandwidth. It is likely that, with the low-band diploe, the parasitic diploe length only affects the low-frequency response of the antenna and remains stable in the high frequency band.Figure 4
S-parameter versus frequency with differentL2.And Figures5 and 6 present the influences of Ld andd3, respectively. Their influences on the impedance bandwidth are clear to the upper frequency range, while the lower are not so clear. This is because there exists mutual coupling between the two upper-band dipoles owing to the short distance comparing to the wavelength. Therefore, changing Ld andd3 will alter the coupling to lead to the change of the corresponding inductance and the capacitance; then the resonant frequency and impedance bandwidth for the upper-band are being adjusted. In one word, all parameters of the upper-band should be optimized to obtain an expected bandwidth.Figure 5
S-parameter versus frequency with differentLd.Figure 6
S-parameter versus frequency with differentd3.


## 2.1. Configuration

The top view of basic geometry of the proposed antenna is shown in Figure1. The solid line in Figure 1(a) represents the outline of the front patch and the dashed line in Figure 1(b) represents the outline of the patch on the back side. They are in an axisymmetric structure and all the sizes are the same, except for the independent printed parasitic patch. It clearly presents the three series-fed printed strip dipoles and an extra printed parasitic patch. The three printed strip dipoles of different lengths, with the arms printed on opposite sides of the dielectric substrate, are connected through a parallel stripline. The parallel stripline consists of two broadside-coupled strips with a width ofWp. The antenna is fed by a conventional coaxial connector through a matched transmission line. The extra parasitic patch is designed at the end of the antenna and is fed by the terminal printed strip dipoles.Figure 1
The top view of the proposed antenna. (a) Front. (b) Back.
(a) (b)In this design, the widthWp of the feeding strip is kept the same, and the total length is mainly determined by the distancesd1 andd2 to decrease the mutual couplings. The radiation of the antenna is divided into two parts, the shorter dipoles with lengthsL3 andL4 are responsible for the higher frequencies while the longer lengthL1 is for the lower frequency, and the parasitic patch is used to broaden the bandwidth of the lower frequency with the longer dipole. In order to reduce the size of the antenna, a folded part vertical to the dipole is added to the longest dipole whose length isH1, and thus the total length of the lower-band antenna becomesL1+H1+H1. Besides, the width of the longest dipole is studied asW1 considering the impedance matching. The parameters of the related parasitic patch to the longest dipole are lengthL2, widthW2, and the distance between the parasitic patch and the dipoled2. After using the parasitic element, the bandwidth is broadened about three times.On the other hand, the upper frequency band is provided by the two sets of upper-band dipoles. To achieve broadband work for high frequency segments, the resonant frequency of the shorter dipole is higher than the nominal center frequency of the high frequency band while the longer one generates the lower part. But both dipoles can radiate effectively in the upper-band. These corresponding parameters areL3 andW3 andL4 andW4 for the shorter and longer dipoles, respectively. The distance between the two dipoles isd3, and the dipoles are directly connected by the parallel stripline. By increasing the length difference of the two dipoles and selecting an optimal distance between them, the widest bandwidth can be obtained for the antenna [15]. Meanwhile, the distance between the upper-band diploe and the bottom of the antenna isd4.The line polarity between the lower-band dipole and the upper-band dipoles is reversed and the antenna fed is at the longer element of the upper-band dipoles through a matched transmission line at the end of the antenna. All of the printed strip dipoles are directly connected by a parallel stripline, and the corresponding phases of current of the connecting stripline are delayed sequentially resulting in end-fire radiation in the direction of propagation. This structure can achieve wideband impedance characteristics and operate at two frequency bands that are relatively far apart.As we know, each dipole generates omnidirectional radiation at its H-plane. However, in this design the radiation of one dipole directed to the other two will distort. Thus, to realize the directional radiation, a U-shaped reflector is designed to reflect the electromagnetic wave of the dipoles as shown in Figure2. It shows that the bottom of the reflector is vertical to the substrate, and the direction is parallel to that of the width of the substrate. The tilt angle between the bottom and tilt side should be adjusted carefully to get the good radiation in the whole frequency band. Finally, the optimized parameters of the antenna including those of the reflector are listed in Table 1.Table 1
The optimized parameters of the antenna and the reflector.
Parameter Value Parameter Value L 1 140mm W p 2mm L 2 112mm d 1 122mm L 3 40mm d 2 4mm L 4 64mm d 3 27mm L m 33mm d 4 40mm W 1 6mm H 1 23mm W 2 4mm W r 47mm W 3 8mm L r 63mm W 4 8mm H r 10mm W m 4mm θ 70°Figure 2
The antenna and the shaped reflector.


## 2.2. Parametric Study

To get good impedance matching, many parameters of the dipoles should be considered, especially for the lengthsL1 andL2, the length difference Ld betweenL3 andL4, and the distanced3. Their influences are obtained by the 3D electromagnetic package High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS) and discussed as follows. The parameters in the following discussions are consistent with that in Table 1; that is, we just change the discussed parameter and keep the rest.Figure3 shows the influence of differentL1 on the S-parameter. It can be clearly seen that the lower-band diploe only affects the lowest frequency response of the antenna and remains stable in the high frequency band. Moreover, the increase of the lower-band diploe leads to the decrease of resonance frequency and the antenna becomes mismatched whenL1 is longer than 148 mm.Figure 3
S-parameter versus frequency with differentL1.The influence of the parasitic patch lengthL2 is shown in Figure 4. Its influence on the bandwidth is so obvious; if the is no parasitic patch, the bandwidth of lower frequency is only 70MHz, but it becomes 310MHz (690-1000MHz) after adding the parasitic strip because an additional resonance is introduced then in the low frequency to widen the original bandwidth. It is likely that, with the low-band diploe, the parasitic diploe length only affects the low-frequency response of the antenna and remains stable in the high frequency band.Figure 4
S-parameter versus frequency with differentL2.And Figures5 and 6 present the influences of Ld andd3, respectively. Their influences on the impedance bandwidth are clear to the upper frequency range, while the lower are not so clear. This is because there exists mutual coupling between the two upper-band dipoles owing to the short distance comparing to the wavelength. Therefore, changing Ld andd3 will alter the coupling to lead to the change of the corresponding inductance and the capacitance; then the resonant frequency and impedance bandwidth for the upper-band are being adjusted. In one word, all parameters of the upper-band should be optimized to obtain an expected bandwidth.Figure 5
S-parameter versus frequency with differentLd.Figure 6
S-parameter versus frequency with differentd3.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The proposed antenna is manufactured and shown in Figure7. The Teflon is used as the substrate whose dielectric constant, loss tangent, and dimension are 2.65, 0.02, and 144mm×132mm×2mm, respectively. And the aluminum material is used for the reflector with a thickness of 3mm.Figure 7
The prototype of the dual-broadband antenna. (a) Front view. (b) Back view.
(a) (b)The measured and simulated S-parameter and gain versus frequency after optimization are shown in Figure8 where both show the good agreements. Measured results show that the proposed antenna has dual-band characteristics. Both frequency bands are broadband and have stable gain and stable matching performance in both frequency bands. Besides, the percentage bandwidths is 36.7% (690-1000MHz) and 47.3% (1710-2770MHz) at the lower and higher frequencies, respectively. According to the measured results, the antenna gain is 4-5dBi in the lower frequency band and 5-6dBi in the higher frequency band. The measured results of antenna gain are lower than the simulation results and may be attributed to the losses of both the coaxial line and the SMA joint, influences of the testing surrounding, and fabrication inaccuracy.Figure 8
Measured and simulated S-parameter and Gain.To validate the design further, the comparisons of both the measured and the simulated radiation patterns at 907MHz, 952MHz, 1885MHz, and 2015MHz are plotted and shown in Figure9, where all are in good agreement. The measured results show that the antenna has good direction and low cross-polarization. For the lower and the higher frequencies, the cross-polarization is less than 30dB and 22dB, the measured half-power beamwidths (HPBWs) of the H-plane are about 120° and 140°, and the front-to-back ratio is less than 15dB and 17dB, respectively.Figure 9
Measured and simulated radiation patterns. (a) 907MHz. (b) 952MHz. (c)1885MHz. (d) 2015MHz.
(a) (b)  (c) (d)


## 4. Conclusions

A novel broadband dual-band dipole antenna has been proposed. Both the simulation and test results showed that it has dual wideband characteristics and the working frequency band which can cover all the frequency bands for 2G/3G/4G wireless communications is 36.7% and 47.3% in the lower bands 690-1000 MHz and upper bands 1710-2770MHz, respectively. The antenna has stable radiation characteristics including gain, good directivity, low cross-polarization, and high front-to-back ratio in the whole band. In addition, it also had the advantages of simple structure, easy processing, low cost, and single port feed. All these properties make it possible as a strong candidate for the wireless communication system.



---

*Source: 4345819-2019-07-03.xml*