# Porous Epoxy: Effect of Mixing Sequences (ELH versus EHL) Using Toluene as Extraction Medium via Ultrasonic Technique

Authors: Siti Noorkhartina Ishak; Pei Leng Teh; Uy Lan Du Ngoc; Cheow Keat Yeoh
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Porous epoxy was fabricated using natural rubber latex (NRL) as the void template. In this study, two mixing sequences were selected: epoxy, hardener, and then latex (EHL) and epoxy, latex, and then hardener (ELH). The extraction process was carried out to extract the latex particles from the cured epoxy sample using toluene as extraction medium with ultrasonic technique for 1 hour. The formation of porous structure in epoxy system is dependent essentially on the amount of latex removed from the epoxy matrix. As expected, the density results showed lower values in the porous epoxy in ELH mixing sequences. More porous structure in epoxy was obtained which was proven by the increasing in porosity % which has led to lowering of the value in dielectric constant which is preferred for electronic packaging application. However, it also caused a decrease in flexural strength and modulus.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Recently, porous materials have received increasing attentions in the fields of electronics, photonics, and life science [1–3]. Epoxy resin has been widely used in electronic packaging industries due to their ease of processing and low cost. Epoxy resin has been widely used by many researchers due to their excellent heat, moisture, and chemical resistance [4–6]. Low dielectric constant (low k) materials are the subject of intense investigation and development in order to replace conventional SiO2 dielectrics for the manufacturing of future generation microelectronic devices [7, 8]. The primary method of lowering the dielectric constant is to make the dielectric film less dense by introducing porosity [9]. There are two fundamental routes to porosity in polymers: either blowing due to sudden gas expansion (as with polymer foams) or the removal of one or more disperse phases [10]. This paper utilized the latter, which encompassed the technique to form porous epoxy based on template method by a mixture with epoxy, polyamine hardener, and latex to produce disperse phase in an epoxy matrix, and then removed the dispersed by extraction using toluene as extraction. The advantages of the present technique over other methods are severalfold. First, the chemistry is limited to only three or four inexpensive chemicals, all of which are relatively stable to water and oxygen, relatively nontoxic, and very forgiving to alterations of the preparation method [11]. Second, the porous structure produced by the present template method can be easily adjusted by controlling the viscosity of latex to produce smaller pores. Third, the epoxy and polyamine used in this study are available in a wide range of molecular weights and can be easily exchanged to induce significant changes in the mechanical and electrical properties of the final epoxy [12]. Ultimately, the purpose of this paper is to highlight a simple method to introduce porosity in epoxy system in order to lower the dielectric constant.


## 2. Materials and Method

### 2.1. Materials

Epoxy DER 331 and polyamide A062 were supplied by Euro Chemo-Pharma Sdn. Bhd. Natural rubber latex was supplied by Grtah Hindus Sdn. Bhd. Epoxy DER 331 has an epoxide equivalent weight of 182–192 g/eq. Polyamide A062 as a curing agent has 110 equivalent per H active. Toluene 2,4-diisocyanate was obtained from Merck Schuchardt OHG, Germany, with density of 1.22 g/cm3.


### 2.2. Sample Preparation

The epoxy resin, hardener, and latex were added according to 100 phr, 60 phr, and 0.5 phr, respectively. The latex content was fixed from 0.5 to 2.0 phr. The first series was followed by the sequences of epoxy, hardener, and then latex (EHL). The second series was followed by the sequences of epoxy, latex, and then hardener (ELH). Epoxy resin and hardener were stirred using mechanical stirrer and then latex was added using dropper until homogenous. After that, the mixture was put in container and placed in oven for curing at 100°C for 1 hour.


### 2.3. Formation of Porous Structure

The samples were immersed in toluene using ultrasonic technique for 60 minutes. Porous structure formed once the latex was extracted out.


### 2.4. SEM

The morphology of the fracture surface was observed using scanning electron microscope (SEM) model JSM-6460LA. The cross section of the SEM specimen was sputter coated with a thin layer of palladiums using the auto fine coater, model JEOL JFC 1600.


### 2.5. Density

The relative density and total pore volume of the porous structure were determined using ACCUPYC II 1340 Gas Displacement Pycnometer according to ASTM D6226.


### 2.6. Porosity

Based on density data, the porosity was determined using(1)
Porosity
%
=
1
-
density  porous
density  bulk
×
100
%
=
1
-
ρ
1
ρ
0
×
100
%
,where ρ
0 and ρ
1 are the densities of the dense polymer and the porous epoxy, respectively.


### 2.7. Mechanical Properties

The flexural test was done according to ASTM D790 using a universal testing machine Instron 5560. The test was done at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The specimen was cut to the required dimension of 60 mm × 13 mm × 3 mm.


### 2.8. Dielectric Constant

The dielectric measurement was performed using impedance gain/phase analyzer (Solartron 1260) in the frequency range of 1 kHz to 1 MHz at room temperature:(2)
Dielectric  constant
=
Capacitance
,
material  as  dielectric
Capacitance
,
air  or  vacuums  as  dielectric
.


## 2.1. Materials

Epoxy DER 331 and polyamide A062 were supplied by Euro Chemo-Pharma Sdn. Bhd. Natural rubber latex was supplied by Grtah Hindus Sdn. Bhd. Epoxy DER 331 has an epoxide equivalent weight of 182–192 g/eq. Polyamide A062 as a curing agent has 110 equivalent per H active. Toluene 2,4-diisocyanate was obtained from Merck Schuchardt OHG, Germany, with density of 1.22 g/cm3.


## 2.2. Sample Preparation

The epoxy resin, hardener, and latex were added according to 100 phr, 60 phr, and 0.5 phr, respectively. The latex content was fixed from 0.5 to 2.0 phr. The first series was followed by the sequences of epoxy, hardener, and then latex (EHL). The second series was followed by the sequences of epoxy, latex, and then hardener (ELH). Epoxy resin and hardener were stirred using mechanical stirrer and then latex was added using dropper until homogenous. After that, the mixture was put in container and placed in oven for curing at 100°C for 1 hour.


## 2.3. Formation of Porous Structure

The samples were immersed in toluene using ultrasonic technique for 60 minutes. Porous structure formed once the latex was extracted out.


## 2.4. SEM

The morphology of the fracture surface was observed using scanning electron microscope (SEM) model JSM-6460LA. The cross section of the SEM specimen was sputter coated with a thin layer of palladiums using the auto fine coater, model JEOL JFC 1600.


## 2.5. Density

The relative density and total pore volume of the porous structure were determined using ACCUPYC II 1340 Gas Displacement Pycnometer according to ASTM D6226.


## 2.6. Porosity

Based on density data, the porosity was determined using(1)
Porosity
%
=
1
-
density  porous
density  bulk
×
100
%
=
1
-
ρ
1
ρ
0
×
100
%
,where ρ
0 and ρ
1 are the densities of the dense polymer and the porous epoxy, respectively.


## 2.7. Mechanical Properties

The flexural test was done according to ASTM D790 using a universal testing machine Instron 5560. The test was done at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The specimen was cut to the required dimension of 60 mm × 13 mm × 3 mm.


## 2.8. Dielectric Constant

The dielectric measurement was performed using impedance gain/phase analyzer (Solartron 1260) in the frequency range of 1 kHz to 1 MHz at room temperature:(2)
Dielectric  constant
=
Capacitance
,
material  as  dielectric
Capacitance
,
air  or  vacuums  as  dielectric
.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Porosity

Figure1 shows the porosity percentage (%) of porous epoxy. Porous epoxy using both ELH and EHL mixing sequences shows increasing trend in porosity %. As seen in the figure, ELH mixing sequence shows higher porosity %. It was postulated that higher porosity means that more porous structure was produced. The data is in line with the flexural properties result which will be discussed in Section 3.3; it is clear that the bending strength and modulus decreased with increasing porosity, which is the decrease of carrying capacity of materials. This typical behavior has been reported by many researchers, and it has been vaguely explained that the densification is assumed to cause relief in the stress concentration in the defects [13, 14].Figure 1
Porosity % of porous epoxy extracted by toluene using mixing sequence of EHL and ELH, respectively.


### 3.2. Density

Figure2 shows the density of porous epoxy with different latex content. The density increased with increasing of latex content. The density of ELH is lower compared to EHL mixing sequence at the same latex content. When more latex was extracted, more porous structure will be formed, and then the density reduced. This is in agreement with Hemmasi et al.; the density reduction is related to the void content achieved in polymer matrix [15].Figure 2
Density of porous epoxy extracted by toluene using mixing sequence of EHL and ELH, respectively.


### 3.3. Flexural Properties

Figure3 shows the effect of latex content on porous epoxy with different mixing sequences using ultrasonic technique. As shown in the figure, flexural strength for both mixing sequences decreased with the increase of latex content. The mixing sequences for epoxy, latex, and then hardener (ELH) show the lower value compared to epoxy, hardener, and then latex (EHL). It can be observed that the flexural strength of mixing sequence ELH exhibited lower flexural strength as compared to mixing sequence ELH at the same latex content at 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 phr, respectively. It is believed that the quantity of porous structure in porous epoxy produced following the sequence of ELH is higher as compared to mixing sequence EHL. This can be explained using the density results which was discussed in Section 3.2. During ultrasonic process, latex particle was extracted from the epoxy to form a porous structure. The lower value means that more latex particle was extracted from the epoxy and formed voids or holes; thus no reinforcing effect is expected [16, 17]. As stress applied to the porous epoxy, it cannot be transferred through the voids nor could the voids absorb the energy, and it thus acted as stress concentration point.Figure 3
The flexural strength of porous epoxy extracted by toluene using mixing sequence of EHL and ELH, respectively.Figure4 shows the SEM micrograph of flexural fracture surface of the porous epoxy. Porous epoxy followed by the mixing sequence of ELH (Figure 4(a)) has smaller and more porous structure compared to EHL. The dispersion of latex in ELH mixing sequences is more dispersed because no crosslinking occurred between epoxy and latex when latex was added to epoxy before the addition of hardener. Thus it produced smaller particles which can be easily extracted using toluene. This led to decrease in density and increase in percentage of porosity, therefore reducing the total ability of the porous epoxy to absorb load during fracture.Figure 4
SEM micrograph showing the flexural fracture surface morphology of porous epoxy at 2.0 phr latex in mixing sequences: (a) epoxy, latex, and then hardener (ELH) and (b) epoxy, hardener, and then latex (EHL), respectively.
(a)
(b)The flexural modulus of porous epoxy is shown in Figure5. The data reveals that the flexural modulus of all latex content decreased with increasing in latex content in the porous epoxy. It can be seen that more voids were obtained by increasing the latex content of the porous epoxy. At the same time, more stress concentrators are introduced to the material. These stress concentrators initiated many weak points in the material that aid in lowering the mechanical properties of the composites.Figure 5
The flexural modulus of porous epoxy extracted by toluene using mixing sequence of EHL and ELH, respectively.


### 3.4. Dielectric Constant

Figures6 and 7 show dielectric constant value with different latex content at different mixing sequences. As shown in both figures, dielectric constant decreased when the latex content was increased. The more porous structure caused the porous epoxy to have low dielectric constant. The dielectric constant is predicted to drop even lower when the latex content is higher. In view of the strong correlation between the increase in porous structure and the decrease in the dielectric constant, it can be concluded that the main microstructural parameter affecting the dielectric constant is the porosity of the samples. Low polymer volume fractions result in a low dielectric constant, presumably because of the residual porosity of the porous epoxy [18, 19]. Also in previous study, the increasing in frequency results in decreasing in dielectric constant. The dielectric constant value also decreased with increasing frequency for both mixing compositions. Table 1 shows the value of dielectric constant at 2.0 phr of latex content. Larger changes of dielectric constant were observed from 103 to 106. These results were attributed to the increase in the amount of latex in ELH mixing sequences. Banjuraizah et al., 2010, stated that a material with a low dielectric constant has a great advantage to be used in high speed integrated circuit substrate since a low dielectric constant will increase signal transmission speeds by decreasing the propagation delay [20].Table 1
Dielectric constant value of porous epoxy at 103 and 106.
Mixing sequence
103 Hz
106 Hz
ELH
36.75
5.01
EHL
48.56
8.59Figure 6
The dielectric constant of porous epoxy for epoxy, latex, and hardener (ELH) mixing by ultrasonic technique.Figure 7
The value of dielectric constant of porous epoxy for epoxy, hardener, and latex (EHL) mixing by ultrasonic technique.


## 3.1. Porosity

Figure1 shows the porosity percentage (%) of porous epoxy. Porous epoxy using both ELH and EHL mixing sequences shows increasing trend in porosity %. As seen in the figure, ELH mixing sequence shows higher porosity %. It was postulated that higher porosity means that more porous structure was produced. The data is in line with the flexural properties result which will be discussed in Section 3.3; it is clear that the bending strength and modulus decreased with increasing porosity, which is the decrease of carrying capacity of materials. This typical behavior has been reported by many researchers, and it has been vaguely explained that the densification is assumed to cause relief in the stress concentration in the defects [13, 14].Figure 1
Porosity % of porous epoxy extracted by toluene using mixing sequence of EHL and ELH, respectively.


## 3.2. Density

Figure2 shows the density of porous epoxy with different latex content. The density increased with increasing of latex content. The density of ELH is lower compared to EHL mixing sequence at the same latex content. When more latex was extracted, more porous structure will be formed, and then the density reduced. This is in agreement with Hemmasi et al.; the density reduction is related to the void content achieved in polymer matrix [15].Figure 2
Density of porous epoxy extracted by toluene using mixing sequence of EHL and ELH, respectively.


## 3.3. Flexural Properties

Figure3 shows the effect of latex content on porous epoxy with different mixing sequences using ultrasonic technique. As shown in the figure, flexural strength for both mixing sequences decreased with the increase of latex content. The mixing sequences for epoxy, latex, and then hardener (ELH) show the lower value compared to epoxy, hardener, and then latex (EHL). It can be observed that the flexural strength of mixing sequence ELH exhibited lower flexural strength as compared to mixing sequence ELH at the same latex content at 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 phr, respectively. It is believed that the quantity of porous structure in porous epoxy produced following the sequence of ELH is higher as compared to mixing sequence EHL. This can be explained using the density results which was discussed in Section 3.2. During ultrasonic process, latex particle was extracted from the epoxy to form a porous structure. The lower value means that more latex particle was extracted from the epoxy and formed voids or holes; thus no reinforcing effect is expected [16, 17]. As stress applied to the porous epoxy, it cannot be transferred through the voids nor could the voids absorb the energy, and it thus acted as stress concentration point.Figure 3
The flexural strength of porous epoxy extracted by toluene using mixing sequence of EHL and ELH, respectively.Figure4 shows the SEM micrograph of flexural fracture surface of the porous epoxy. Porous epoxy followed by the mixing sequence of ELH (Figure 4(a)) has smaller and more porous structure compared to EHL. The dispersion of latex in ELH mixing sequences is more dispersed because no crosslinking occurred between epoxy and latex when latex was added to epoxy before the addition of hardener. Thus it produced smaller particles which can be easily extracted using toluene. This led to decrease in density and increase in percentage of porosity, therefore reducing the total ability of the porous epoxy to absorb load during fracture.Figure 4
SEM micrograph showing the flexural fracture surface morphology of porous epoxy at 2.0 phr latex in mixing sequences: (a) epoxy, latex, and then hardener (ELH) and (b) epoxy, hardener, and then latex (EHL), respectively.
(a)
(b)The flexural modulus of porous epoxy is shown in Figure5. The data reveals that the flexural modulus of all latex content decreased with increasing in latex content in the porous epoxy. It can be seen that more voids were obtained by increasing the latex content of the porous epoxy. At the same time, more stress concentrators are introduced to the material. These stress concentrators initiated many weak points in the material that aid in lowering the mechanical properties of the composites.Figure 5
The flexural modulus of porous epoxy extracted by toluene using mixing sequence of EHL and ELH, respectively.


## 3.4. Dielectric Constant

Figures6 and 7 show dielectric constant value with different latex content at different mixing sequences. As shown in both figures, dielectric constant decreased when the latex content was increased. The more porous structure caused the porous epoxy to have low dielectric constant. The dielectric constant is predicted to drop even lower when the latex content is higher. In view of the strong correlation between the increase in porous structure and the decrease in the dielectric constant, it can be concluded that the main microstructural parameter affecting the dielectric constant is the porosity of the samples. Low polymer volume fractions result in a low dielectric constant, presumably because of the residual porosity of the porous epoxy [18, 19]. Also in previous study, the increasing in frequency results in decreasing in dielectric constant. The dielectric constant value also decreased with increasing frequency for both mixing compositions. Table 1 shows the value of dielectric constant at 2.0 phr of latex content. Larger changes of dielectric constant were observed from 103 to 106. These results were attributed to the increase in the amount of latex in ELH mixing sequences. Banjuraizah et al., 2010, stated that a material with a low dielectric constant has a great advantage to be used in high speed integrated circuit substrate since a low dielectric constant will increase signal transmission speeds by decreasing the propagation delay [20].Table 1
Dielectric constant value of porous epoxy at 103 and 106.
Mixing sequence
103 Hz
106 Hz
ELH
36.75
5.01
EHL
48.56
8.59Figure 6
The dielectric constant of porous epoxy for epoxy, latex, and hardener (ELH) mixing by ultrasonic technique.Figure 7
The value of dielectric constant of porous epoxy for epoxy, hardener, and latex (EHL) mixing by ultrasonic technique.


## 4. Conclusion

Porous epoxy thermosets were successfully prepared and compared between mixing sequences of epoxy/latex/hardener (ELH) and epoxy/hardener/latex (EHL) using toluene as extraction medium with ultrasonic technique. Overall ELH mixing sequences showed the higher porosity as compared to EHL mixing sequences and it can be concluded that ELH is the better mixing sequence in forming the porous epoxy. As the latex content increased from 0 phr to 2.0 phr, the microstructure of the epoxy systems changed from dense to porous. Both the flexural strength and modulus for porous epoxy decreased with increasing the latex content. This was due to the increase in porosity % in the porous epoxy and correlated well with morphological observations obtained by SEM. Lastly, dielectric constant value for porous epoxy was found to decrease with decrease in the density of material.



---

*Source: 4385626-2016-02-18.xml*