# Essential Oil Composition and Antimicrobial Activities of Two Closely Related Species,Alpinia mutica Roxb. and Alpinia latilabris Ridl., from Peninsular Malaysia

Authors: Halijah Ibrahim; Yasodha Sivasothy; Devi Rosmy Syamsir; Noor Hasima Nagoor; Natasha Jamil; Khalijah Awang
Journal: The Scientific World Journal
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

The essential oils obtained by hydrodistillation of the unripe and ripe fruits ofAlpinia mutica Roxb. and Alpinia latilabris Ridl. were analysed by capillary GC and GC-MS. The oils were principally monoterpenic in nature. The unripe and ripe fruit oils of A. mutica were characterized by camphor (21.0% and 15.8%), camphene (16.6% and 10.2%), β-pinene (8.6% and 13.5%), and trans,trans-farnesol (8.0% and 11.2%), respectively. The oils of the unripe and ripe fruits were moderately active against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, and Trichophyton rubrum. 1,8-Cineole (34.2% and 35.9%) and β-pinene (20.2% and 19.0%) were the two most abundant components in the unripe and ripe fruit oils of A. latilabris. The oil of the unripe fruits elicits moderate activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Trichophyton mentagrophytes while Candida glabrata was moderately sensitive to the oil of the ripe fruits.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Alpinia is one of the largest genera in the Zingiberaceae and it is widely distributed in the Southeast Asian region. In Malaysia and Indonesia, the rhizomes of the commonAlpinia species,A. galangaWilld. known aslengkuas, are mainly used to flavour food. In Malay traditional use, the leaves of this plant are boiled and used as a body lotion [1].A. conchigera Griff.,locally known aslengkuas ranting andlengkuas kecil, is used for treating rheumatism after child birth [1]. Several other species ofAlpinia are used as ornamentals due to the beautiful inflorescence and flowers such asA. purpurata K. Schum.,A. zerumbet (Pers.) Burt and R. M. Smith, andA. mutica. It is interesting to investigate the chemistry and the bioactivity of theAlpinia species in particular, the wild species which are yet to be exploited. Some of the essential oils of theAlpinia species were reported to exhibit various bioactivities such as antimicrobial, larvicidal, and antioxidant  [2–5].A. mutica is a herbaceous perennial plant, 1.2–1.7 m tall, indigenous to Peninsular Malaysia and Thailand. Several variants can be observed in the wild, but the type species are distributed within the northern part of Peninsular Malaysia where the specimen used in this study was collected from. The leaves are distichous and narrowly elliptic. The fruits are spherical, less than 2 cm in diameter, and sparsely covered with hairs and the edible fruits turn orange when ripe. This plant is commonly used by the locals to treat flatulence and the fruits are used by some village folk to treat diarrhoea (pers. comm). In comparison, A. latilabris is a taller plant with broader leaves that grows up to 3 m or more and found wild in Peninsular Malaysia [6]. The flowers are yellow with crimson spots and stripes, orchid-like, and borne in an inflorescence. The fruits are more or less globose, 2–2.5 cm in diameter, and covered with many stiff hairs. The unripe fruits are green turning orange on ripening. The ripe fruits contain many aromatic seeds and are edible. Both the rhizomatous and perennial species are naturally grouped together within the subsection Catimbium [7] as their floral characteristics are closely similar to one another. A. mutica has been frequently planted in gardens and public parks; however, due to rapid development and deforestation activities, both species are becoming rare in the wild.In our continuous effort to study the essential oils of the Zingiberaceae species and their antimicrobial activities [2, 3, 8, 9], the present study aims to investigate the essential oil composition of the unripe and ripe fruit oils ofA. mutica andA. latilabris and their antimicrobial activity.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Plant Material and Reagents

The unripe and ripe fruits ofA. mutica andA. latilabris, authenticated by Professor Halijah Ibrahim, were collected from the Rimba Ilmu Botanic Garden, in the vicinity of University Malaya in October 2009. Voucher specimens (HI 1417 and HI 1418, resp.) have been deposited in the university herbarium. Pentane (GC-MS grade) and the homologous series of n-alkanes (C6–C30) were purchased from Merck (Germany) and Dr. Ehrenstorfer Gmbh (Germany), respectively.


### 2.2. Isolation of Essential Oils

Fresh unripe and ripe fruits ofA. mutica (280 g and 38 g) andA. latilabris (1200 g and 290 g), respectively, were separately hydrodistilled for 4 hours in an all-glass apparatus similar to that described in the British Pharmacopoeia using pentane as the collecting solvent [10]. The solvent was carefully removed using a gentle stream of nitrogen gas, yielding aromatic oils in each case. The oil yields (w/w) wereA. mutica: 0.04% (unripe fruits) and 0.16% (ripe fruits);A. latilabris: 0.08% (unripe fruits) and 0.05% (ripe fruits), all on a fresh weight-basis.


### 2.3. Gas Chromatography (GC) Analysis

GC analysis was carried out using an Agilent 7890A GC System equipped with a FID and an Agilent 7683B Series autoinjector. A HP-5MS UI (30 m × 0.25 mm id, film thickness 0.25μm) fused-silica capillary column was employed. Operating conditions were as follows: initial oven temperature, 60°C for 10 mins, then to 230°C at 3°C min−1 and held for 20 mins; injector and detector temperatures, 250°C; carrier gas, 1.0 mL min−1 N2; injection volume, 0.2 μL; split ratio, 20 : 1. Quantitative data were obtained electronically from FID area percent without the use of correction factors.


### 2.4. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis

GC-MS analysis was performed using an Agilent 6890N Network GC System equipped with an Agilent 7683 Series autoinjector coupled to an Agilent 5975 Inert Mass Selective Detector and the same capillary GC conditions as described above. Carrier gas used was He at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. Significant MS operating parameters were ionization voltage, 70 eV;  ion source temperature, 230°C;  and mass range, 50–600 u.


### 2.5. Identification of Constituents

Constituents were identified by comparison of their mass spectra with those of authentic compounds or with reference spectra in the computer library (NIST 05) and confirmed by comparison of retention indices with those of authentic compounds or with data in the literature [8, 9, 11].


### 2.6. Antimicrobial Assay

#### 2.6.1. Test Microorganisms

The essential oils were tested against a panel of eight microorganisms:Staphylococcus aureus(ATCC 25923), a methicillin susceptibleS. aureus isolate, Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633),Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739),Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853),Candida glabrata (ATCC 64677),Microsporum canis (ATCC 36299),Trichophyton mentagrophytes (ATCC 18748), andTrichophyton rubrum (ATCC 28188). The inoculum was adjusted to obtain a turbidity comparable to that of McFarland standard tube number 0.5 [12] for further use.


#### 2.6.2. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

Media were sterilized by autoclaving at 120°C for 15 minutes and all subsequent manipulations were carried out in a class 2 laminar flow cabinet. The effectiveness of the antifungal and antibacterial activities of the essential oils was quantified in liquid media by employing the microdilution method using microtiter plates (12 × 8 wells). 10μL of the stock solution (50 mg/mL) of each essential oil in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (not more than 10% of total volume in well A) and 90 μL of broth were added to the well labeled as A. Only 50 μL of broth was added to wells labeled as B until H. The oils and broth in well A were mixed thoroughly before transferring 50 μL of the resultant mixture into well B. The same procedure was repeated for mixtures in well B until H, thus creating a serial dilution of the test materials. 50 μL of inoculum (microbes tested) was added to well A to well H. The microtiter plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Cycloheximide (50 mg/mL) was used as the standard antibiotic for comparison with the antifungal activities of the essential oils while Oxacillin (50 mg/mL) was used as the standard for the antibacterial testing. DMSO served as the negative control. Turbidity was taken as indication of growth; thus, the lowest concentration which remains clear after macroscopic evaluation was taken as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The MIC was recorded as a mean concentration of triplicates. The activities were categorized as weak (MIC ≥ 5.0 mg/mL), moderate (MIC 1 mg/mL–4.9 mg/mL), and strong (MIC ≤ 1 mg/mL).


## 2.1. Plant Material and Reagents

The unripe and ripe fruits ofA. mutica andA. latilabris, authenticated by Professor Halijah Ibrahim, were collected from the Rimba Ilmu Botanic Garden, in the vicinity of University Malaya in October 2009. Voucher specimens (HI 1417 and HI 1418, resp.) have been deposited in the university herbarium. Pentane (GC-MS grade) and the homologous series of n-alkanes (C6–C30) were purchased from Merck (Germany) and Dr. Ehrenstorfer Gmbh (Germany), respectively.


## 2.2. Isolation of Essential Oils

Fresh unripe and ripe fruits ofA. mutica (280 g and 38 g) andA. latilabris (1200 g and 290 g), respectively, were separately hydrodistilled for 4 hours in an all-glass apparatus similar to that described in the British Pharmacopoeia using pentane as the collecting solvent [10]. The solvent was carefully removed using a gentle stream of nitrogen gas, yielding aromatic oils in each case. The oil yields (w/w) wereA. mutica: 0.04% (unripe fruits) and 0.16% (ripe fruits);A. latilabris: 0.08% (unripe fruits) and 0.05% (ripe fruits), all on a fresh weight-basis.


## 2.3. Gas Chromatography (GC) Analysis

GC analysis was carried out using an Agilent 7890A GC System equipped with a FID and an Agilent 7683B Series autoinjector. A HP-5MS UI (30 m × 0.25 mm id, film thickness 0.25μm) fused-silica capillary column was employed. Operating conditions were as follows: initial oven temperature, 60°C for 10 mins, then to 230°C at 3°C min−1 and held for 20 mins; injector and detector temperatures, 250°C; carrier gas, 1.0 mL min−1 N2; injection volume, 0.2 μL; split ratio, 20 : 1. Quantitative data were obtained electronically from FID area percent without the use of correction factors.


## 2.4. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis

GC-MS analysis was performed using an Agilent 6890N Network GC System equipped with an Agilent 7683 Series autoinjector coupled to an Agilent 5975 Inert Mass Selective Detector and the same capillary GC conditions as described above. Carrier gas used was He at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. Significant MS operating parameters were ionization voltage, 70 eV;  ion source temperature, 230°C;  and mass range, 50–600 u.


## 2.5. Identification of Constituents

Constituents were identified by comparison of their mass spectra with those of authentic compounds or with reference spectra in the computer library (NIST 05) and confirmed by comparison of retention indices with those of authentic compounds or with data in the literature [8, 9, 11].


## 2.6. Antimicrobial Assay

### 2.6.1. Test Microorganisms

The essential oils were tested against a panel of eight microorganisms:Staphylococcus aureus(ATCC 25923), a methicillin susceptibleS. aureus isolate, Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633),Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739),Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853),Candida glabrata (ATCC 64677),Microsporum canis (ATCC 36299),Trichophyton mentagrophytes (ATCC 18748), andTrichophyton rubrum (ATCC 28188). The inoculum was adjusted to obtain a turbidity comparable to that of McFarland standard tube number 0.5 [12] for further use.


### 2.6.2. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

Media were sterilized by autoclaving at 120°C for 15 minutes and all subsequent manipulations were carried out in a class 2 laminar flow cabinet. The effectiveness of the antifungal and antibacterial activities of the essential oils was quantified in liquid media by employing the microdilution method using microtiter plates (12 × 8 wells). 10μL of the stock solution (50 mg/mL) of each essential oil in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (not more than 10% of total volume in well A) and 90 μL of broth were added to the well labeled as A. Only 50 μL of broth was added to wells labeled as B until H. The oils and broth in well A were mixed thoroughly before transferring 50 μL of the resultant mixture into well B. The same procedure was repeated for mixtures in well B until H, thus creating a serial dilution of the test materials. 50 μL of inoculum (microbes tested) was added to well A to well H. The microtiter plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Cycloheximide (50 mg/mL) was used as the standard antibiotic for comparison with the antifungal activities of the essential oils while Oxacillin (50 mg/mL) was used as the standard for the antibacterial testing. DMSO served as the negative control. Turbidity was taken as indication of growth; thus, the lowest concentration which remains clear after macroscopic evaluation was taken as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The MIC was recorded as a mean concentration of triplicates. The activities were categorized as weak (MIC ≥ 5.0 mg/mL), moderate (MIC 1 mg/mL–4.9 mg/mL), and strong (MIC ≤ 1 mg/mL).


## 2.6.1. Test Microorganisms

The essential oils were tested against a panel of eight microorganisms:Staphylococcus aureus(ATCC 25923), a methicillin susceptibleS. aureus isolate, Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633),Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739),Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853),Candida glabrata (ATCC 64677),Microsporum canis (ATCC 36299),Trichophyton mentagrophytes (ATCC 18748), andTrichophyton rubrum (ATCC 28188). The inoculum was adjusted to obtain a turbidity comparable to that of McFarland standard tube number 0.5 [12] for further use.


## 2.6.2. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

Media were sterilized by autoclaving at 120°C for 15 minutes and all subsequent manipulations were carried out in a class 2 laminar flow cabinet. The effectiveness of the antifungal and antibacterial activities of the essential oils was quantified in liquid media by employing the microdilution method using microtiter plates (12 × 8 wells). 10μL of the stock solution (50 mg/mL) of each essential oil in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (not more than 10% of total volume in well A) and 90 μL of broth were added to the well labeled as A. Only 50 μL of broth was added to wells labeled as B until H. The oils and broth in well A were mixed thoroughly before transferring 50 μL of the resultant mixture into well B. The same procedure was repeated for mixtures in well B until H, thus creating a serial dilution of the test materials. 50 μL of inoculum (microbes tested) was added to well A to well H. The microtiter plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Cycloheximide (50 mg/mL) was used as the standard antibiotic for comparison with the antifungal activities of the essential oils while Oxacillin (50 mg/mL) was used as the standard for the antibacterial testing. DMSO served as the negative control. Turbidity was taken as indication of growth; thus, the lowest concentration which remains clear after macroscopic evaluation was taken as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The MIC was recorded as a mean concentration of triplicates. The activities were categorized as weak (MIC ≥ 5.0 mg/mL), moderate (MIC 1 mg/mL–4.9 mg/mL), and strong (MIC ≤ 1 mg/mL).


## 3. Results and Discussion

Table1 lists the constituents identified in the essential oils of the unripe and ripe fruits of A. mutica and A. latilabris, the relative GC peak areas of these constituents, and their experimental retention indices on the HP-5 MS UI column.Table 1
Essential oil constituents of the flowers, unripe and ripe fruits ofA. mutica Roxb. and A. latilabris Ridl.
Constituent
RI(HP-5MS UI)
Area (%)a
A. mutica
A. latilabris
Unripe fruits
Ripe fruits
Unripe fruits
Ripe fruits
2-Heptanone
888
t
0.1
—
—
2-Heptanol
899
0.7
0.5
0.8
0.7
Tricyclene
920
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.2
α-Thujene
925
0.1
0.1
—
0.2
α-Pineneb
935
5.7
6.9
8.2
8.8
Campheneb
948
16.6
10.2
5.1
5.8
Benzaldehyde
959
0.1
0.1
—
0.1
Sabinene
972
—
0.1
—
—
β-Pineneb
980
8.6
13.5
20.2
19.0
6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one
987
t
0.1
—
0.1
Myrceneb
991
3.2
2.1
2.1
1.6
α-Phellandreneb
1003
1.0
1.2
2.5
0.7
α-Terpinene
1017
0.1
0.1
—
—
p-Cymeneb
1024
0.3
0.5
—
0.1
Limonene
1029
4.2
2.9
0.2
—
1,8-Cineoleb
1031
5.1
9.6
34.2
35.9
cis-β-Ocimeneb
1037
t
t
—
—
2-Heptyl acetate
1048
0.1
—
t
—
trans-β-Ocimeneb
1050
0.1
0.1
—
0.4
γ-Terpineneb
1059
t
0.2
0.8
0.3
Octanol
1071
0.1
—
—
—
trans-Linalool oxide (furanoid)
1073
—
t
0.1
—
Fenchone
1083
—
t
—
—
Terpinoleneb
1088
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
2-Nonanone
1090
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
Linaloolb
1099
1.8
1.5
2.7
2.3
Fencholb
1115
t
0.1
—
t
trans-Sabinene hydrate
1117
—
0.1
—
—
cis-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol
1121
—
0.1
—
—
Camphorb
1143
21.0
15.8
7.4
8.8
Camphene hydrate
1147
—
—
0.3
—
β-Pinene oxide
1162
—
0.1
0.1
—
Isoborneolb
1163
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
Borneolb
1168
0.9
0.8
1.8
2.2
Terpinen-4-olb
1176
0.6
0.5
1.0
1.0
p-Cymen-8-ol
1184
0.1
—
—
—
α-Terpineolb
1190
2.2
1.9
3.2
3.1
Myrtenalb
1196
0.1
0.1
—
0.3
Myrtenol
1197
—
—
0.1
0.1
trans-Piperitol
1208
t
—
—
—
β-Citronellolb
1228
0.1
0.6
t
0.1
Neral
1238
—
t
0.1
0.1
Geraniolb
1255
0.3
1.0
0.3
—
Geranial
1270
—
0.5
0.1
0.2
Bornyl acetateb
1289
0.4
0.2
0.4
0.2
Thymol
1294
—
t
2-Undecanone
1299
t
0.1
0.1
—
Carvacrol
1299
—
—
—
0.1
Methyl geranate
1324
—
t
—
—
α-Cubebene
1350
—
—
t
0.1
Neryl acetate
1367
t
—
—
—
α-Copaeneb
1372
0.1
—
—
—
Geranyl acetateb
1380
0.2
0.1
0.1
—
β-Elemene
1402
—
—
t
—
β-Caryophylleneb
1419
2.5
2.1
1.0
0.5
trans-α-Bergamotene
1435
0.4
0.4
—
0.2
α-Humuleneb
1454
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
trans-β-Farnesene
1456
0.1
0.1
—
0.1
allo-Aromadendrene
1457
—
—
0.1
—
β-Santalene
1461
—
t
—
—
ar-Curcumeneb
1481
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
α-Zingibereneb
1495
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.1
trans,trans-α-farnesene
1507
1.9
1.9
0.5
0.4
γ-Cadinene
1515
—
0.2
—
—
β-Sesquiphellandrene
1523
1.4
1.0
0.5
0.4
α-Elemol
1534
—
—
0.1
—
Germacrene B
1561
—
t
—
—
trans-Nerolidolb
1563
0.9
1.2
1.1
1.0
Caryophyllene oxideb
1583
0.8
1.3
—
0.6
γ-Eudesmol
1631
—
—
0.1
—
β-Eudesmol
1644
—
—
0.1
—
α-Cadinol
1653
0.1
—
0.2
—
α-Santalol
1680
0.4
0.4
—
—
α
-Bisabolol
1684
0.9
0.3
—
0.2
cis,cis-Farnesol
1717
—
—
—
0.5
trans,trans-Farnesolb
1723
8.0
11.2
—
—
trans,trans-Farnesal
1739
—
0.3
—
0.2
trans,cis-Farnesol
1743
—
—
0.2
—
93.7%
94.1%
97.0%
97.7%
aPercentage of total FID area obtained on HP-5 MS UI column, t = (<0.05%).
bPreviously reported in the young and matured fruits of A. mutica Roxb. by Sirat et al., 2009 [13].53 constituents were identified in the unripe fruit oil ofA. mutica while the ripe fruit oil yielded 60 identified constituents. Monoterpenoids dominated the volatile profile of the unripe and ripe fruit oils, contributing to total 74.0% and 71.9%, respectively. These figures were largely due to camphor (21.0% and 15.8%), camphene (16.6% and 10.2%), β-pinene (8.6% and 13.5%), 1,8-cineole (5.1% and 9.6%), and α-pinene (5.7% and 6.9%), respectively, the first being the most abundant component in both oils. Sesquiterpenoids were significant in number, totaling 18.4% in the unripe fruit oil and 21.1% in the oil of the ripe fruits, withtrans,trans-farnesol clearly predominating (8.0% and 11.2%, resp.). Comparison of the composition of the unripe and ripe fruit oils of A. mutica with those previously examined by Sirat and coworkers revealed marked differences [13]. In contrast to the present analysis, the oils reported by Sirat and her coworkers identified high yields of sesquiterpenoids (74.4%–77.4%). Among the 44 and 41 constituents identified in the young and matured fruits, respectively, by the previous group, 31 were found to be common in the present investigation [13]. With regard to camphor, camphene, β-pinene, and α-pinene, the compounds which characterized the fruit oils in this study, they were only detected at concentrations below 2.0% in the previous investigation [13].trans,trans-Farnesol, the most abundant constituent in the fruit oils isolated by Sirat et al. (44.3%–51.2%), only made up a smaller fraction of the sesquiterpenoid composition in the present investigation [13]. Unlike Sirat et al., the exact isomers for β-farnesene, α-farnesene, and α-bergamotene were determined in this analysis. However, we were not able to detect 3-phenyl-2-butanone, carvacrol, α-cubebene, β-elemene, γ-elemene, β-bisabolene, docosane, tricosane, tetracosane, and pentacosane. These differences may have been attributed to the source, cultivation, vegetative stage, and the growing season of the species under investigation [14].Analysis of the unripe and ripe fruit oils ofA. latilabris resulted in the identification of 45 and 44 constituents, respectively. In contrast to its rhizome oil being rich in phenylpropanoids, in particulartrans-methyl cinnamate (89.5%) [15], monoterpenoids (91.7% and 92.1%) characterized the oils of the unripe and ripe fruits, respectively, with 1,8-cineole (34.2% and 35.9%), β-pinene (20.2% and 19.0%), α-pinene (8.2% and 8.8%), camphor (7.4% and 8.8%), and camphene (5.1% and 5.8%) accounting for more than half of each sample, respectively.Overall, the similarity of compounds in the unripe and ripe fruits ofA. mutica andA. latilabris is 48% and 61%, respectively. Botanically,A. mutica andA. latilabris are believed to be two closely related species. Preliminary molecular study of the length and GC (guanine, cytosine) composition of internal transcribed spacer (ITS1 and ITS2) regions of these two species showed that both species have the same length for ITS1 (177 bp) and ITS2 (224 bp) spacer. The total GC content ofA. latilabris(55.1% in ITS1 and 58.9% in ITS2) varies only slightly from that ofA. mutica (54.7% in ITS1 and 57.6 in ITS2). The relatively high similarities in the chemical composition and the preliminary molecular data implicate that these two species are closely related.The unripe and ripe fruit oils ofA. mutica andA. latilabris were tested against two Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus andBacillus subtilis), two Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli andPseudomonas aeruginosa), and four fungal strains (Candida glabrata,Microsporum canis,Trichophyton mentagrophytes, andTrichophyton rubrum) as showed in Table 2. Both the unripe fruit oil and ripe fruit oil ofA. mutica showed antibacterial activity againstB. subtilis (2.50 mg/mL and 1.25 mg/mL, resp.) andS. aureus (2.50 mg/mL for both). The ripe fruit oil showed the highest activity towardsB. subtilis; however, it is about ninefold less active than the standard, oxacillin. Both oils also showed potency of 2.50 mg/mL to 5.0 mg/mL against the dermatophytesM. canis, T. mentagrophytes, andT. rubrum. Interestingly both oils exhibited the same potency as the standard, cycloheximide againstT. mentagrophytes. Overall the ripe fruit oil ofAlpinia mutica exhibited slightly higher activity (lower MIC againstB. subtilis andM. canis) as compared to the unripe fruit. Both oils, however, showed no activity (MIC > 5.0 mg/mL) against the pathogensE. coli, P. aeruginosa,andC. glabrata.Table 2
Antimicrobial activity (MIC) of the unripe and ripe fruit oils ofA. mutica and A. latilabris.
Microorganisms
MIC (mg/mL)*
A. mutica
A. latilabris
Standards
Unripe fruit oil
Ripe fruit oil
Unripe fruit oil
Ripe fruit oil
Oxacillin
Cycloheximide
Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923)
2.50
2.50
2.50
5.00
0.20
n.t
Bacillus subtilis  (ATCC 6633)
2.50
1.25
5.00
5.00
0.14
n.t
Escherichia coli  (ATCC 8739)
>5.00
>5.00
>5.00
5.00
0.65
n.t
Pseudomonas aeruginosa  (ATCC 27853)
>5.00
>5.00
>5.00
5.00
5.08
n.t
Candida glabrata  (ATCC 64677)
>5.00
>5.00
>5.00
2.50
n.t
0.04
Microsporum canis  (ATCC 36299)
5.00
2.50
5.00
5.00
n.t
1.88
Trichophyton mentagrophytes  (ATCC 18748)
2.50
2.50
2.50
5.00
n.t
2.50
Trichophyton rubrum  (ATCC 28188)
2.50
2.50
5.00
5.00
n.t
1.88
n.t = not tested.
*Weak (MIC ≥ 5.0 mg/mL), moderate (MIC 1 mg/mL–4.9 mg/mL), and strong (MIC ≤ 1 mg/mL).The oils ofA. latilabris, both unripe and ripe, showed inhibition towards the bacteriaS. aureus andB. subtilis with MIC values between 2.50 mg/mL and 5.0 mg/mL. However, only the ripe fruit oil showed weak activity againstE. coli andP. aeruginosa with MIC value of 5.0 mg/mL. Both oils also elicited antifungal activities against the dermatophytesM. canis, T. mentagrophytes, andT. rubrum with MIC values of 2.50 mg/mL to 5.0 mg/mL. On the other hand, only the ripe fruit oil showed moderate potency againstC. glabrata while the unripe oil is void of activity. Interestingly, the unripe fruit oil ofA. latilabris showed the same MIC value againstT. mentagrophytes as that of cycloheximide. Therefore, both the unripe and ripe oils ofA. mutica and the unripe fruit oil ofA. latilabris showed similar antifungal activity as the antifungal drug, cycloheximide.


## 4. Conclusions

The unripe and ripe fruit oils of bothA. mutica andA. latilabris were principally monoterpenic in nature. The unripe and ripe fruit oils ofA. mutica were characterized by high levels of camphor (21.0% and 15.8%) and camphene (16.6% and 10.2%) while those ofA. latilabris were dominated by 1,8-cineole (34.2% and 35.9%) and β-pinene (20.2% and 19.0%). In general, the fruit oils exhibited weak to moderate antimicrobial activity. However, it is interesting to note that both unripe and ripe fruit oils ofA. mutica and the unripe fruit oil ofA. latilabrisshowed similar potency as the standard drug, cycloheximide, againstTrichophyton mentagrophytes.



---

*Source: 430831-2014-05-27.xml*