# Phylogeny of Ten KenyanPlectranthus Species in theColeus Clade Inferred from Leaf Micromorphology,Rbcl andMatK Genes

Authors: Fredrick M. Musila; Catherine W. Lukhoba; Joseph M. Nguta; Saifuddin F. Dossaji
Journal: Journal of Botany
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Plectranthus species are difficult to taxonomically delimit due to lack of clear-cut morphological synapomorphies. This study is aimed at bringing insights into classification of tenPlectranthus species in theColeus clade by using leaf micromorphology and molecular data. Stomatal counts and observation of microtome leaf sections generated leaf micromorphology data, while molecular data was obtained from sequencingMatK andRbcl genes from each species. Phylogeny based on theMatK andRbcl gene sequences clustered four speciesP. caninus,P. otostegioides,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus together (Clusters A and D, respectively), whileP. pseudomarrubioides,P. ornatus, andP. aegyptiacus were grouped together into Clusters B and E, respectively, andP. montanus andP. amboinicus were grouped together (Cluster C). A dendrogram was generated through a cluster analysis of the leaf micromorphological characters grouped together,P. caninus,P. ornatus,P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides (Cluster F). The dendrogram also grouped togetherP. aegyptiacus,P. amboinicus,P. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus (Cluster G). The present study has grouped the ten studiedPlectranthus species using molecular and leaf micromorphology characters into phylogenies, which are supported by previous studies, and proved that these characters can aid in plant identification and phylogenetic studies.


---

## Body

## 1. Background and Justification

Plectranthus belongs to the family Labiatae (Subfamily Nepetoideae, tribe Ocimeae).Plectranthus genus consists of about 300 species distributed in the tropical and warm regions of the world.Plectranthus species are aromatic, perennial subshrub, or succulent shrub ranging from 0.2 m to 5 m tall [1]. It has proved difficult to classify species withinPlectranthus genus as there are no clear morphological synapomorphies and the genus is faced with a lot of synonymy whereby a species is referred by another name somewhere else [2]. In addition, several other closely related genera within Labiatae such asOcimum L.,Solenostemon Thonn., andEnglerastrum Briq. are still treated separately and thereforePlectranthus in broad sense could be still paraphyletic [3]. Few taxonomic studies have been published on phylogenetic relationships amongPlectranthus species. Initially,Plectranthus species were classified using morphological characters only and this led to placement of various species in different families like Verbenaceae rather than in their right Labiatae family [4]. In the latest revision of the genus based on morphological characters, two major clades are recognized withinPlectranthus genus:Plectranthus andColeus clades [5].Plectranthus clade consists of about 30 species whileColeus clade consists of 70 species [5].Coleus clade is further subdivided into three subclades by Paton et al. [5] which areHolostylon (species with an entire style),Solenostemon (species with fused anterior calyx lobes), andCalceolanthus (species whose calyx throat is surrounded by dense ring of hairs). UnlikePlectranthus clade, the most taxonomic difficulties are observed in theColeus clade which is well-represented in Kenya and of which majority of the species are used as medicinal plants [2].Paton et al. [4] proposed a new classification system using molecular data after he carried out a phylogeny of basils and allies (Labiatae, tribe Ocimeae) based on sequences of thetrnL intron,trnL-trnF intergenic spacer andrps16 intron. The study led to better understanding of the relationships among members of the tribe Ocimeae which includesPlectranthus genus and it was established that the tribe Ocimeae was monophyletic and easily diagnosable with morphological synapomorphies. Moreover, the study by Paton et al. [4] also indicated thatPycnostachys andHolostylon formed a monophyletic group which was closely related toPlectranthus genus. In another study, Lukhoba mappedPlectranthus economic uses to the phylogenetic tree based on molecular analysis proposed by Paton et al. [4] and concluded that species within theColeus clade were richer in number and diversity of uses among the species ofPlectranthus [2]. Elsewhere, Grayer carried out a chemosystematic study by looking at the distribution of exudate flavonoids inPlectranthus and found out that 40% of the species within thePlectranthus clade produced exudate flavonoids, mainly flavones, and that at least five species within thePlectranthus clade could produce flavanones while flavanols were only found in two species within theColeus clade [3]. A phylogenetic study conducted on the medicinal plantP. asirensis J.R.I Wood, a plant endemic to Saud Arabia usingrps16,rpoB,Rbcl,nrITS, andrpoC1 genes, reported thatP. asirensis was closely related toP. barbatus andP. hadiensis (Forssk.) Schweinf. Ex Spreng. and even more closely related toP. caninus andP. coeruleus based on DNA sequences from thenrITS andrps16 genes [6]. DNA from four species ofPlectranthus, which includeP. grandis,P. barbatus,P. neochilus, andP. amboinicus, was studied using RAPD analysis to show interspecific diversity among the four species by Bandeira et al. [7]. All the four species were shown to be monophyletic in origin withP. neochilus Schltr. being closely related toP. amboinicus whileP. grandis (L.H.Cramer) R.H.Willemse was closely related toP. barbatus [7]. Moreover, a study on the development of barcodes for investigating phylogenetic relationships ofP. hadiensis by Amarasinghe et al. [8] observed thatP. hadiensis was closely related toP. amboinicus andP. amicorum S.T.Blake and even more closely related to bothP. caninus andP. barbatus.Leaf micromorphology may provide insights into how plant species evolve in terms of leaf anatomy and respond to different climatic conditions. Morphology of epidermal cells, stomata, and trichome types have been used as systematic characters and a combination of some of these features is relevant especially to the identification of species within the tribe Mentheae (subfamily Nepetoideae) in Labiatae family [9]. Several micromorphological studies have been conducted onPlectranthus and related genera. To begin with, comprehensive morphological studies of trichomes have been done on species of Lamiaceae family, notably the genusSalvia [10, 11]. Ordinary caulinar secondary growth has been observed in many dicotyledons and has been reported inPlectranthus neochilus [12]. Rectangular transection is also frequently observed in members of Labiatae and also the presence of collenchyma in the four angles has also been observed in the family as well [13]. A quadrangular cross-section of the stem has been observed inP. barbatus andP. neochilus [14]. InP. barbatus stem, the endodermis has been reported to contain many amyloplasts and the vascular bundle arrangement ofP. neochilus has a striking similarity with that ofP. barbatus [14]. Such similarity has also been observed by Evert where the vascular bundles inColeus are primarily formed in the fascicular regions [12].With regard to leaf anatomy, members within the Labiatae family have diacytic and anomocytic stomata both on the abaxial and adaxial surfaces although tetracytic stomata have been observed in the family as well [14].P. neochilus has been reported to have diacytic stomata (stomata surrounded by two cells) on both surfaces whileP. barbatus has been reported to have anomocytic stomata where stomata are surrounded by many subsidiary cells [14]. InPlectranthus australis, diallelocytic stomata have been reported where three or more cells of different sizes at the right angles of the guard cells are found surrounding the stomata [15]. Micromorphological studies of trichomes of Lamiaceae revealed that different types of glandular and nonglandular trichomes occur in the family [16]. Glandular trichomes are responsible for the production of essential oils, flavone aglycones, and resiniferous acids which protect the plant from herbivores, pathogens as well as attracting insects for pollination. For example, peltate trichomes which have uniform morphology, capitate glandular, and nonglandular trichomes have been reported in the family [17]. Capitate trichomes have also been reported inP. madagascariensis (Pers.) Benth,P. ornatus and inP. barbatus [14]. Peltate trichomes ofP. ornatus have been reported to be found only on the abaxial leaf surface while inP. madagascariensis they occur on both sides of the leaf [18].With regard to organization of the leaf chlorenchyma, isobilateral, centric, or dorsiventral mesophyll has occasionally been reported in Lamiaceae family [16]. Dorsiventral mesophyll has been reported inP. barbatus while homogenous mesophyll occurs inP. neochilus [14]. In homogenous mesophyll, the leaf anatomy layers are very hard to differentiate and this kind of mesophyll is predominant in those species with succulent leaves [19]. Epidermal cell shapes inPlectranthus can either be polygonal, where they resemble polygons or sinuous, where they have many curved edges while midrib may be convex, concave, plain convex, biconvex, or concave-convex [14].Plectranthus still remains a controversial genus when it comes to classification and some species grouped under other genera could be still underPlectranthus. More studies are needed to investigate whetherPlectranthus is monophyletic, to test the current generic circumscription and to determine morphological characters that are suitable to support a comprehensive phylogeny based classification. For example, studies on molecular phylogeny ofPlectranthus using sequences from various regions of nucleus and chloroplast DNA such astrnK, nuclear ITS,Rbcl, andMatK or even using other methods such as SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms), RAPDS (random amplified polymorphic DNA), and RFLPs (restriction fragment length polymorphisms) need to be conducted. These molecular characters and methods may suggest relationships in phylogeny as they have been used successfully in other species [20–22]. Chemotaxonomic studies, leaf micromorphology, and cytology are also needed and may help in phylogenetic elucidation ofPlectranthus genus. This will help in the development of a formal classification since the current groupings ofPlectranthus species are not congruent with previous morphological classification ofPlectranthus species [5]. The majority of species withinPlectranthus genus is succulent leaves and stems and is aromatic due to glandular trichomes present on its leaves. Stems are quadrangular, leaves are simple, broad, and oval-shaped with a tapering tip and are very thick; they are thickly studded with hairs and the lower surface usually has numerous glandular hairs. Flowers are borne on a short stem, pale purplish in dense whorls at distant intervals in a long slender raceme [5]. Various diagnostic morphological characters described in the Flora of Tropical East Africa (FTEA) for identifying the ten species under investigation have been summarized in Table 1.Table 1
Description of the tenPlectranthus species.
Species
Succulent leaf
Height (m)
No. of inflorescence Flowers
Cymes
Pedicels length (mm)
Calyx length (mm)
Corolla length (mm)
Petiole length (mm)
Leaf apex
Bracts
Nutlet color
Staminal filaments
Leaf blade
Succulent stem
Eglandular hairs
P. barbatus
+
1–5
10–14
5–7
3–7
3–5
8–26
3–50
Ob/rd
ov/api
Brown/black
Fused
El/ov
+
An/pt
P. caninus
+
0.1–0.6
6
3
2
3–5
6–14
3–10
Ob/rd
ov
Grey/black
Fused
El/ov
−
Rt/pt
P. montanus
+
0.4–2.5
10–40
5–20
2-3
1.5
3–5
0
Ob/rd
El/ov
Brown/red
Free
El/obv
+
Rt/pt
P. otostegioides
+
0.3–0.5
6
3
6-7
5
11–15
3
Ob/rd
Obv/El
Brown/red
Fused
Ov/El/Obv
−
pt
P. lanuginosus
+
0.3–1
6–12
3–6
3–6
3-4
8–16
5–30
Ob
EL
Brown/black
Fused
Triangular
−
pt
P. pseudomarrubioides
+
1
10–14
5–7
1–3
2
5–9
1–15
Ob
El
Brown/red
Free
Rhombic
+
Rt/pt
P. edulis
−
0.3–1.2
6–10
3–5
3–5
2-3
6–8
1–20
Ob/rd
ov
Brown/black
Fused
Ov
−
Unknown
P. ornatus
+
0.4–1.5
6
3
3
5-6
14–22
2–10
Ob/rd
ov
Grey/black
Fused
El/ov
−
An/pt
P. aegyptiacus
+
0.5–2.5
6–24
3–12
3–10
2-3
8–15
5–20
Ac/rd
ov
Brown/red
Fused
Triangular
−
An/pt
P. amboinicus
+
0.3–0.5
10–20
5–10
3
3
4–15
2–13
Ob/rd
Ov/api
Brown/red
Fused
Ov
+
rt/pt
Morphological characters obtained from the latestPlectranthus classification in the FTEA [5]; Key. + (present); − (absent); Ob (obtuse); rd (round); Ac (acute); Ov (ovate); api (apiculate); El (elliptic); Obv (obovate); An (antrorse); pt (patent); rt (retrorse).


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Collection ofPlectranthus Species Samples

Leaves and voucher specimens of tenPlectranthus species grouped under theColeus clade were collected from various geographical regions of Kenya in 2014. Following information available in the Flora of Tropical East Africa onPlectranthus genus and also from already available nomenclatural types in the herbarium, it was possible to identify the specific locality of the species and collect them. Collected species were identified and voucher specimens deposited in Nairobi University Herbarium (NAI). The following are the voucher specimen numbers of the specimens collected:Plectranthus barbatus (FM2014/01),Plectranthus edulis (FM2014/02),Plectranthus ornatus (FM2014/03),Plectranthus caninus (FM2014/04),Plectranthus pseudomarrubioides (FM2014/05),Plectranthus otostegioides (FM2014/06),Plectranthus amboinicus (FM201407),Plectranthus aegyptiacus (FM2014/08),Plectranthus montanus (FM2014/09), andPlectranthus lanuginosus (FM2014/10).


### 2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR, and Sequencing

DNA was extracted from fresh leaves of the collectedPlectranthus species using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) DNA extraction method. Two chloroplast genes regarded as universal molecular markers suitable for phylogenetic studies for lower taxonomic ranks in plants were targeted. These genes were maturase K gene(MatK) and large subunit of the ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylasegene (Rbcl). Amplification of DNA was carried out using primers of the two genes selected from previous phylogenetic studies of species within Labiatae. The primers wereMatK-390F [23] andMatK-1326R [8] for amplifying theMatK gene andRbcl-1F [24] andRbcl724R [25] for amplifying theRbcl gene. The primers and synthetic oligonucleotides for DNA amplification were ordered from Inqaba Biotec East Africa (IBEA), South Africa. PCR products were purified and bidirectionally sequenced at Inqaba Biotec East Africa (IBEA). The obtained sequences of the two genes from the tenPlectranthus species were then exported to MEGA 6 software (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6) for phylogenetic analysis [26].


### 2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

All theMatK andRbcl sequences from the tenPlectranthus species were subjected to multiple alignment using muscle alignment method in MEGA6 [27]. Multiple sequence alignment helped identify gaps and similar and mismatch regions among the two molecular characters (MatK andRbcl genes), which are prerequisite steps in the creation of phylogenetic trees. During phylogenetic analysis, the evolution model followed was maximum composite likelihood model [26] while the statistical method used was UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) [28] and the test for phylogeny was bootstrap method [29]. The number of bootstrap iterations for the sequences was set at 1000. The aligned sequences already in MEGA 6 were subjected to these three parameters resulting in construction ofMatK andRbcl maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees. Maximum composite likelihood is frequently preferred because it aids taxonomists to discriminate among many equally likely assignments by using the posterior probabilities for each probable nucleotide or amino acid assignment and to generate the most likely (most parsimonious) tree which fits the data [26].


### 2.4. Stomatal Distribution and Density inPlectranthus Leaves

One centimeter cubed of leaf tissue was removed from the middle section of the leaves of three individuals of eachPlectranthus species and placed in a glass boiling tube. This was followed by addition of 5 ml of glacial acetic acid and hydrogen peroxide in equal parts, in sufficient quantity to cover the material, and the tubes were then heated to 70°C. After 2 hours, the epidermal layers were teased apart from each other, washed in water, stained and mounted on microscope slides, and observed at ×100 and ×400 magnifications [30]. Microscope type used was LEICA DM 500 microscope. Stomatal density was determined for each surface by counting stomata in magnification fields in the three individuals of each of the tenPlectranthus species investigated, then the average was calculated.


### 2.5. Leaf Micromorphology

To study leaf anatomy, portions of leaf lamina from three individuals of each species were cut into 4–10 mm2 sections prior to rehydration. Tissues were then rehydrated in a series of 25% alcohol, 10% alcohol, and distilled water followed by staining in saturated aqueous safranin O. The stained tissues were then dehydrated in an alcohol series, 50% alcohol and 100% Xylene. The dehydrated tissues were then infiltrated in a series of xylene : paraffin oil (50% : 50%) and 100% paraffin oil followed by a second series of molten paraplast. The infiltrated tissues were later embedded in paraffin in casting boats. Paraffin embedded blocks were then sectioned transversely at 2 μm thickness with razor blades on a rotary microtome [31]. Slides were later observed and photographed at ×100 and ×400 magnifications in LEICA DM 500 microscope to observe differences in the arrangement of various internal leaf layers (epidermal cells, palisade layer, and spongy mesophyll) as well as trichomes among thePlectranthus species.


### 2.6. Cluster Analysis Based on Leaf Characters

Phenetic analysis (cluster and principal components) is commonly used as a tool to better understand the trends of morphological variations, by indicating relationships among taxa inform of dendrograms or cladograms [32]. Character states from the characters obtained in the study were assigned values and were subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis in SPSS Version 23 to generate a dendrogram showing linkages between the species based on their character values. The statistical method used was average linkage between groups which is also referred to as UPGMA [33]. This is the same statistical method used in the analysis ofMatK andRbcl sequences. Cluster analysis usually groups organisms together based on their overall similarity generating dendrograms. The dendrograms can be used to draw inferences about interspecific taxonomic relationships among the species investigated and can also be compared with molecular phylogenetic trees.


## 2.1. Collection ofPlectranthus Species Samples

Leaves and voucher specimens of tenPlectranthus species grouped under theColeus clade were collected from various geographical regions of Kenya in 2014. Following information available in the Flora of Tropical East Africa onPlectranthus genus and also from already available nomenclatural types in the herbarium, it was possible to identify the specific locality of the species and collect them. Collected species were identified and voucher specimens deposited in Nairobi University Herbarium (NAI). The following are the voucher specimen numbers of the specimens collected:Plectranthus barbatus (FM2014/01),Plectranthus edulis (FM2014/02),Plectranthus ornatus (FM2014/03),Plectranthus caninus (FM2014/04),Plectranthus pseudomarrubioides (FM2014/05),Plectranthus otostegioides (FM2014/06),Plectranthus amboinicus (FM201407),Plectranthus aegyptiacus (FM2014/08),Plectranthus montanus (FM2014/09), andPlectranthus lanuginosus (FM2014/10).


## 2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR, and Sequencing

DNA was extracted from fresh leaves of the collectedPlectranthus species using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) DNA extraction method. Two chloroplast genes regarded as universal molecular markers suitable for phylogenetic studies for lower taxonomic ranks in plants were targeted. These genes were maturase K gene(MatK) and large subunit of the ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylasegene (Rbcl). Amplification of DNA was carried out using primers of the two genes selected from previous phylogenetic studies of species within Labiatae. The primers wereMatK-390F [23] andMatK-1326R [8] for amplifying theMatK gene andRbcl-1F [24] andRbcl724R [25] for amplifying theRbcl gene. The primers and synthetic oligonucleotides for DNA amplification were ordered from Inqaba Biotec East Africa (IBEA), South Africa. PCR products were purified and bidirectionally sequenced at Inqaba Biotec East Africa (IBEA). The obtained sequences of the two genes from the tenPlectranthus species were then exported to MEGA 6 software (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6) for phylogenetic analysis [26].


## 2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

All theMatK andRbcl sequences from the tenPlectranthus species were subjected to multiple alignment using muscle alignment method in MEGA6 [27]. Multiple sequence alignment helped identify gaps and similar and mismatch regions among the two molecular characters (MatK andRbcl genes), which are prerequisite steps in the creation of phylogenetic trees. During phylogenetic analysis, the evolution model followed was maximum composite likelihood model [26] while the statistical method used was UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) [28] and the test for phylogeny was bootstrap method [29]. The number of bootstrap iterations for the sequences was set at 1000. The aligned sequences already in MEGA 6 were subjected to these three parameters resulting in construction ofMatK andRbcl maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees. Maximum composite likelihood is frequently preferred because it aids taxonomists to discriminate among many equally likely assignments by using the posterior probabilities for each probable nucleotide or amino acid assignment and to generate the most likely (most parsimonious) tree which fits the data [26].


## 2.4. Stomatal Distribution and Density inPlectranthus Leaves

One centimeter cubed of leaf tissue was removed from the middle section of the leaves of three individuals of eachPlectranthus species and placed in a glass boiling tube. This was followed by addition of 5 ml of glacial acetic acid and hydrogen peroxide in equal parts, in sufficient quantity to cover the material, and the tubes were then heated to 70°C. After 2 hours, the epidermal layers were teased apart from each other, washed in water, stained and mounted on microscope slides, and observed at ×100 and ×400 magnifications [30]. Microscope type used was LEICA DM 500 microscope. Stomatal density was determined for each surface by counting stomata in magnification fields in the three individuals of each of the tenPlectranthus species investigated, then the average was calculated.


## 2.5. Leaf Micromorphology

To study leaf anatomy, portions of leaf lamina from three individuals of each species were cut into 4–10 mm2 sections prior to rehydration. Tissues were then rehydrated in a series of 25% alcohol, 10% alcohol, and distilled water followed by staining in saturated aqueous safranin O. The stained tissues were then dehydrated in an alcohol series, 50% alcohol and 100% Xylene. The dehydrated tissues were then infiltrated in a series of xylene : paraffin oil (50% : 50%) and 100% paraffin oil followed by a second series of molten paraplast. The infiltrated tissues were later embedded in paraffin in casting boats. Paraffin embedded blocks were then sectioned transversely at 2 μm thickness with razor blades on a rotary microtome [31]. Slides were later observed and photographed at ×100 and ×400 magnifications in LEICA DM 500 microscope to observe differences in the arrangement of various internal leaf layers (epidermal cells, palisade layer, and spongy mesophyll) as well as trichomes among thePlectranthus species.


## 2.6. Cluster Analysis Based on Leaf Characters

Phenetic analysis (cluster and principal components) is commonly used as a tool to better understand the trends of morphological variations, by indicating relationships among taxa inform of dendrograms or cladograms [32]. Character states from the characters obtained in the study were assigned values and were subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis in SPSS Version 23 to generate a dendrogram showing linkages between the species based on their character values. The statistical method used was average linkage between groups which is also referred to as UPGMA [33]. This is the same statistical method used in the analysis ofMatK andRbcl sequences. Cluster analysis usually groups organisms together based on their overall similarity generating dendrograms. The dendrograms can be used to draw inferences about interspecific taxonomic relationships among the species investigated and can also be compared with molecular phylogenetic trees.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Molecular Phylogeny of TenPlectranthus Species

After DNA sequencing,MatK andRbcl genes from the tenPlectranthus species were deposited in the nucleotide database of GenBank. The assigned GenBank accession numbers (MF495684–MF495703) are presented in Table 2.Table 2
GenBank accession numbers for genes from the tenPlectranthus species.
Plectranthus species
Gene
GenBank accession number
Gene
GenBank accession number
P. barbatus
MatK
MF495684
Rbcl
MF495698
P. edulis
MatK
MF495685
Rbcl
MF495696
P. montanus
MatK
MF495686
Rbcl
MF495700
P. amboinicus
MatK
MF495687
Rbcl
MF495701
P. lanuginosus
MatK
MF495688
Rbcl
MF495699
P. otostegioides
MatK
MF495689
Rbcl
MF495703
P. ornatus
MatK
MF495690
Rbcl
MF495695
P. aegyptiacus
MatK
MF495691
Rbcl
MF495702
P. caninus
MatK
MF495692
Rbcl
MF495697
P. pseudomarrubioides
MatK
MF495693
Rbcl
MF495694Aligned sequences were used in the creation of phylogenetic trees following maximum composite likelihood model and employing UPGMA and Bootstrap resampling as a statistical method and as a test of phylogeny, respectively. The most likely phylogenetic trees were constructed using gene sequences from the tenPlectranthus species as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
A bootstrap consensus phylogenetic tree based onMatK gene sequences.The numbers at branch nodes are bootstrap values which indicate percentage number of bootstrap iterations which support the tree at that particular point of divergence/at each node of the phylogenetic tree. The higher the bootstrap value, the more the topology of the phylogenetic tree is supported. Species close to each other in the phylogenetic tree are closely related. BasedMatK gene sequences,P. caninus,P. otostegioides,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus, have been shown to be closely related (Cluster A), this clade has a moderate bootstrap support value of 58, whileP. ornatus,P. pseudomarrubioides, andP. aegyptiacus have been grouped together (Cluster B) and this grouping has a bootstrap value of 34 implying it is poorly supported. The phylogenetic tree also shows thatP. montanus andP. amboinicus are closely related and form a monophyletic group (Cluster C) which has a moderate bootstrap support value of 52. All the species share a distant common ancestor withP. edulis.Based on theRbcl gene sequences,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. montanous,P.ornatus,P. amboinicus, andP. edulis have also been grouped together (Cluster D), whileP. caninus,P. lanuginosus,P. barbatus, andP. otostegioides have also been grouped together (Cluster E) and both groups are related toP. aegyptiacus which is grouped alone. Cluster D has a moderate bootstrap support value of 54, while Cluster E is well supported with a high bootstrap value of 87.BothMatK andRbcl phylogenetic trees are strikingly similar. For example, based on theMatK genes,P. caninus,P. otostegioides,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been grouped together and all the four species form a monophyletic group (Cluster A). The same pattern can be observed in the phylogenetic tree created using theRbcl genes (Cluster E). Again based on theMatK genes,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. ornatus,P. montanus, andP. amboinicus have been showed to be closely related (Cluster B). This close relationship of these species can also be observed in phylogenetic trees produced using theRbcl genes (Cluster D). However, based onMatK genes,P. aegyptiacus has been shown to be closely related toP. pseudomarrubioides andP. ornatus (Cluster B), while based on theRbcl genes,P. edulis is closely related toP. amboinicus,P. ornatus,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. amboinicus, andP. montanus (Cluster D).


### 3.2. Leaf Micromorphology ofPlectranthus Species

#### 3.2.1. Leaf Micromorphology ofPlectranthus Species

Overall variations in leaf anatomical characters observed in three individuals of each of the tenPlectranthus species are tabulated in Table 3. The characters include nature of the leaf, stomata occurrence, stomata type, epidermal cell type, trichome type, glandular trichomes, nature of the mesophyll, nature of the palisade layer, and the number of stomata on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces.Table 3
Leaf micromorphology in the tenPlectranthus species.
Species
Nature of the leaf
Stomata occurrence
Stomata type
Epidermal cell type
Trichome type
Glandular trichomes
Mesophyll
Palisade layer
Average number of stomata on the abaxial surface
Average number of stomata on the adaxial surface
P. caninus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
Long- stalked
Present
Dorsiventral
Long columnar cells
35
25
P. aegyptiacus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
50
36
P. edulis
Nonsucculent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
Short-stalked
Absent
Dorsiventral
Long columnar cells
47
35
P. pseudomarrubioides
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
36
25
P. barbatus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
Capitate
Present
Dorsiventral
Long columnar cells
45
39
P. lanuginosus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
Capitate
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
58
49
P. otostegioides
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
28
20
P. montanus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
28
23
P. ornatus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
long-stalked
Present
Dorsiventral
Long columnar cells
35
27
P. amboinicus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Absent
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
45
33
Sinuous: containing many curved edges,Polygonal: resembling a polygon, anomocytic: surrounded by more than four subsidiary cells, homogenous mesophyll: a mesophyll whose layers are hard to differentiate, dorsiventral mesophyll: a mesophyll with distinct dorsal and ventral surfaces, capitate: a trichome culminating in a compact head, Ad: adaxial leaf surface, and Ab: abaxial leaf surface.Leaf anatomical characters which contributed to most of the differences among the tenPlectranthus investigated include epidermal cell type which was either sinuous (Figure 3) or polygonal (Figure 4), trichome type which ranged from being long-stalked, short-stalked, glandular, and nonglandular to capitate (Figure 5), nature of the leaf mesophyll which was either dorsiventral (whereby upper epidermis, palisade layer, spongy mesophyll, and lower epidermis were easily identified as distinct) or homogenous (whereby the various layers of the leaf mesophyll were indiscreet and not easily identified) (Figures 3 and 4). For thePlectranthus species with dorsiventral mesophyll, the palisade layer could easily be identified bearing the usual long columnar cells while for those with homogenous mesophyll, the palisade layer was inconspicuous just like the other layers of that homogenous mesophyll. The average number of stomata on both sides was highest inP. barbatus,P. amboinicus,P. aegyptiacus,P. lanuginosus, andP.edulis. Fewer numbers of stomata were observed inP. pseudomarrubioides,P. otostegioides, andP. montanus. In all the species, fewer numbers of stomata were observed in the adaxial surface compared to the abaxial surface (Table 3).


#### 3.2.2. Dendrogram Based on the Leaf Micromorphology Data

Leaf micromorphology data was subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis. Character states were assigned values and scored in a matrix, the matrix (Table4) was subjected to cluster analysis.Table 4
Leaf micromorphology character states matrix of the tenPlectranthus species.
Plectranthus species
Leaf micromorphology characters from the tenPlectranthus species
Succulent leaf
Stomata distribution
Stomata type
Epidermal Cell type
Trichome type
Glandular Trichomes
Nature of mesophyll
Palisade layer
Stomata no. (adaxial)
Stomata no. (abaxial)
P. caninus
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
Character state scores/values
P. aegyptiacus
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
P. edulis
2.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
P. seudomarruboides
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
P. barbatus
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 & 3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
P. lanuginosus
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 & 3.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
4.00
5.00
P. otostegioides
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
P. montanous
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
P. ornatus
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 & 3.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
P. amboinicus
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
Succulent leaf: 1 (present), 2 (absent), stomata occurrence: 1 (adaxial surface), 2 (Abaxial surface), and 3 (both surfaces), stomata type: 1 (anomocytic), epidermal cell type: 1 (sinuous), 2 (polygonal), trichome type: 1 (long-stalked), 2 (short-stalked), and 3 (capitate), glandulartrichomes: 1 (present), 2 (absent), and 3 (both glandular and nonglandular trichomes present), mesophyll: 1 (homogenous), 2 (dorsiventral), palisade layer: 1 (normal long columnar cells), 2 (inconspicuous), stomata number on the adaxial surface: 1 (<20 stomata), 2 (20–30 stomata), 3 (30–40 stomata), 4 (40–50 stomata), and 5 (>50 stomata), stomata number on the abaxial surface: 1 (<20 stomata), 2 (20–30 stomata), 3 (30–40 stomata), 4 (40–50 stomata), and 5 (>50 stomata).Hierarchical cluster analysis of the leaf micromorphology character state matrix in Table4 in SPSS led to the average linkage dendrogram (Figure 6).P. caninus,P. ornatus,P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides were together in one group (Cluster F), whileP. aegyptiacus,P. amboinicus,P. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been placed in another group (Cluster G). The inner branches of the dendrogram show thatP. caninus is similar toP. ornatus.P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides are likewise similar, hence, they have been grouped together.P. aegyptiacus has also been placed close toP. amboinicus and, lastly,P. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been grouped together as well (Figure 6).


#### 3.2.3. Dendrogram Based on Morphological Characters Described in the FTEA

Using gross morphological characters of the tenPlectranthus species previously described in Table 1, the following character state matrix (Table 5) was created and subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis.Table 5
Gross morphology character state matrix of the tenPlectranthus species.
Plectranthusspecies
Gross morphological characters from the tenPlectranthus species
Succulent leaf
Height
Inflorescence
Cymes
Pedicel length
Calyx length
Calyx nature
Corolla length
Corolla colour
Leaf apex
Bracts
Nutlets
Staminal filaments
Leaf blade
Petiole
Stems
Stems colour
Eglandular hairs
Stems shape
P. barbatus
1.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Character state scores/values
P. caninus
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
P. montanus
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
4.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
P. otostegioides
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
P. lanuginosus
1.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
P. pseudomarrubioides
1.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
5.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
P. edulis
2.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
1.00
P. ornatus
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
P. aegyptiacus
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
P. amboinicus
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
Succulent leaf: 1 (present), 2 (absent), height: 1 (<0.3 m), 2 (0.3–0.5 m), 3 (0.5–1 m), and 4 (>1 m), inflorescence: 1 (with <10 flowered verticils), 2 (with 10–20 flowered verticils), and 3 (with >20 flowered verticils), cymes: 1 (<5 flowered), 2 (5–10 flowered), and 3 (>10 flowered), pedicel length: 1 (<3 mm long), 2 (3–6 mm long), and 3 (>6 mm long), calyx length: 1 (<2 mm long), 2 (2–4 mm long), and 3 (>4 mm long), nature of calyx: 1 (pubescent), 2 (tomentose), 3 (villose), and 4 (pubescent to villose), corolla length: 1 (<10 mm long), 2 (10–20 mm long), and 3 (>30 mm long), corolla colour: 1 (blue to purple with white marks), 2 (white with white marks), 3 (pale blue to lilac), and 4 (blue with purple marks), leaf apex: 1 (obtuse to rounded), 2 (obtuse), and 3 (acute to rounded), bracts: 1 (ovate, apiculate), 2 (ovate), 3 (ovate to elliptic), 4 (obovate to elliptic), and 5 (broadly elliptic), nutlets: 1 (brown with reddish dots), 2 (brown with dark dots), and 3 (dark grey with dark dots), staminal filaments: 1 (fused), 2 (free), Leaf blade: 1 (elliptic, ovate, obovate), 2 (triangular), and 3 (trullate, rhombic), petiole length: 1 (<10 mm long), 2 (10–20 mm long), 3 (20–50 mm long), and 4 (epetiolate/sessile), stem: 1 (succulent), 2 (nonsucculent/soft wooded), stem colour: 1 (sometimes purplish above), 2 (pinkish to dark red), and 3 (unknown), eglandular hairs: 1 (antrose and patent), 2 (patent), 3 (retrose and patent), and 4 (unknown), stem shape: 1 (rounded and quadrangular).Hierarchical cluster analysis of the above gross morphology character state matrix (Table5) resulted in the following average linkage dendrogram (Figure 7). The dendrogram shows taxonomic relationships among thePlectranthus species based on gross morphological characters as described in FTEA [5].Two main clusters/groups are evident from the dendrogram above which occur at about the same horizontal distance. One cluster (H) containsP. lanuginosus,P. edulis,P. barbatus,P. caninus,P. otostegioides, andP. ornatus. The other cluster (I) containsP. montanus,P. amboinicus,P. pseudomarrubioides, andP. aegyptiacus. Cluster H further showsP. lanuginosus,P. edulis, and P. barbatus have been grouped together andP. caninus,P. otostegioides, andP. ornatus have been grouped together as well. This implies that members within each cluster are very close morphologically (Figure 7).


### 3.3. Discussion

Based on the current study, theMatK andRbcl genes from tenPlectranthus species have been sequenced and phylogenetic trees have been reconstructed from the sequences. Based on theMatK gene sequences,P. caninus,P. otostegioides,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been grouped together (Cluster A), whileP. ornatus,P. pseudomarrubioides, andP. aegyptiacus have been grouped together in another group, Cluster B (Figure 1). Species grouped together imply that they share a close common ancestor. The phylogenetic tree also shows thatP. montanus andP. amboinicus form another group (Cluster C) and all the species share a distance common ancestor withP. edulis. On the other hand, a phylogenetic tree reconstructed based on theRbcl gene sequences grouped togetherP. pseudomarrubioides,P. montanus,P. ornatus,P. amboinicus, andP. edulis (Cluster D), indicating that these four species are closely related (Figure 2). TheRbcl phylogenetic tree also grouped togetherP. caninus,P. lanuginosus,P. barbatus, andP. otostegioides forming another group (Cluster E), also indicating that both groups are related toP. aegyptiacus which is grouped alone. From the results, it may be argued that theMatK gene is better in delimitingP. aegyptiacus and, likewise, theRbcl gene is better in delimitingP. edulis among species within theColeus clade.Figure 2
A bootstrap consensus phylogenetic tree based onRbcl gene sequences.Figure 3
(a) Transverse section ofP. lanuginosus leaf (mg = ×100) showing homogenous mesophyll, sinuous epidermal cells, and long-stalked trichomes. (b) Abaxial surface ofP. pseudomarrubioides leaf (mg = ×400) showing anomocytic stomata.
(a)
(b)Figure 4
Transverse section ofP. ornatus leaf. This pattern inP. ornatus of long columnar cells, long-stalked trichomes, dorsiventral mesophyll, and polygonal epidermal cells was also observed inP. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. caninus.Figure 5
Trichomes identified inPlectranthus species: (A) long-stalked glandular trichome (inP. caninus andP. ornatus), (B) short-stalked glandular trichome (inP. aegyptiacus,P. edulis,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. amboinicus), (C) capitate nonstalked trichome (inP. ornatus), (D) nonglandular trichomes (inP. ornatus), (E) capitate glandular trichome (inP. lanuginosus andP. barbatus), and (F) capitate glands (inP. ornatus).Figure 6
Leaf micromorphology average linkage dendrogram.Figure 7
Average linkage dendrogram showing taxonomic relationships of the tenPlectranthus species based on morphological characters in the FTEA.Comparison of the two trees based on theMatK and theRbcl analyses shows that they are very similar. For example based on theMatK genes,P. caninus,P. otostegioides,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been grouped together. The same pattern can be observed in the phylogenetic tree created using theRbcl genes implying that Cluster A based on theMatK genes is similar to Cluster E based on theRbcl genes. Again based on theMatK genes,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. ornatus,P. montanus, andP. amboinicus have been shown to be closely related. This close relationship of these species can also be observed in phylogenetic tree produced using theRbcl genes which likewise implies that Cluster B based on theMatK genes is similar to Cluster D based on theRbcl genes. Based on theMatK genes,P. aegyptiacus was shown to be closely related toP. pseudomarrubioides andP. ornatus, while based on theRbcl genes,P. edulis is closely related toP. amboinicus,P. ornatus,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. amboinicus, andP. montanus. Generally species grouped together in phylogenetic trees imply that they share a more recent ancestor.Plectranthus species have been classified based on their ethnobotanical uses by Lukhoba et al. [2]. In that study, the authors were able to assign all thePlectranthus species in this study to theColeus clade. Further,P. montanus was grouped together withP. pseudomarrubioides,P. amboinicus was grouped together withP. aegyptiacus, whileP. barbatus,P. caninus, andP. lanuginosus were grouped together [2]. Their findings are similar to the observation in this study based on theMatK andRbcl gene sequences.P. montanus andP. pseudomarrubioides have been shown to be closely related andP. barbatus,P. caninus, andP. lanuginosus have been shown to be closely related as well and hence have been grouped together.P. amboinicus grouped together withP. montanus was shown to be distantly related toP. barbatus based on phylogenetic trees reconstructed from three plastid DNA gene sequences:trnL intron,trnL-trnF intergene spacer, andrps16 gene by Paton et al. [4]. In addition, Al-Qurainy et al. [6] likewise observed thatP. amboinicus was closely related toP. montanus. Such findings are supported by the results in the current study where byMatK andRbcl phylogenetic trees showed thatP. amboinicus was closely related toP. montanus, but distantly related toP. barbatus. In addition, the phylogenetic tree reconstructed by Al-Qurainy et al. [6] based onnrITS gene also indicated thatP. barbatus was closely related toP. caninus. The findings by Paton et al. [4] and Al-Qurainy et al. [6] are in line with the data in the current study based on theMatK andRbcl which have grouped togetherP. amboinicus andP. montanus and also grouped togetherP. barbatus andP. caninus, implying that these pairs of species are closely related.A dendrogram produced from the cluster analysis of morphological characters described in the Flora of Tropical East Africa (Figure7) showed two main groups: Cluster H and Cluster I. Cluster H contained the speciesP. lanuginosus,P. edulis,P. barbatus,P. caninus,P. otostegioides, andP. ornatus, while Cluster I containedP. montanus,P. amboinicus,P. pseudomarrubioides, andP. aegyptiacus. Inner branches of Cluster H further showed thatP. lanuginosus,P. edulis, and P. barbatus were morphologically similar andP. caninus,P. otostegioides, andP. ornatus are morphologically similar as well hence they have been grouped together. Morphological similarity in most cases is correlated to genetic similarity [34]. Hence, these close relations based on morphology within each group implied that members within each group were closely related. Such relationships ofPlectranthus species described in the FTEA were very similar to what has been observed from the phylogenetic trees created from theMatK andRbcl gene sequences in the current study.Grayer investigated the distribution of exudate flavonoids inPlectranthus species and consequently came up with a phylogenetic tree based on the distribution of the exudate flavonoids [3]. Of particular interest to the current study areP. aegyptiacus,P. pseudomarrubioides, andP. montanus which are among thePlectranthus species Grayer investigated [3]. The study reported that bothP. pseudomarrubioides andP. montanus produce Quercetin 3-methyl ether and Quercetin 3,7-dimethyl ether and also reported that bothP. pseudomarrubioides andP. aegyptiacus produced Cirsimaritin [3]. This implies thatP. pseudomarrubioides is genetically similar to bothP. aegyptiacus andP. montanus and this supports the findings of the current study.Leaf micromorphology in the present study involved investigation of the internal leaf anatomy and stomatal distribution of the tenPlectranthus species in theColeus clade. Such a study focused on the arrangement of the leaf mesophylls, type of epidermal cells, trichomes, stomata density, stomata type, and stomata occurrence on both the abaxial and adaxial surfaces of the leaves. Data obtained from the study was used to generate average linkage dendrogram for better understanding of the taxonomic relationships between the ten species. Leaf anatomical characters which contributed to most of the differences in the tenPlectranthus investigated included epidermal cell type which was sinuous or polygonal (Figures 3 and 4), trichome type which ranged from being long-stalked, short-stalked, glandular, and nonglandular to capitate (Figure 5), the nature of the leaf mesophyll which was either homogenous or dorsiventral, and the nature of the palisade layer (Figures 3 and 4). From the leaf micromorphology dendrogram (Figure 6), the tenPlectranthus species were grouped into two main groups:P. caninus,P. ornatus,P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides were grouped together in Cluster F, whileP. aegyptiacus,P. amboinicus,P. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus were placed in Cluster G. The inner branches of Cluster F show thatP. caninus is similar toP. ornatus. In addition, by looking at Cluster F,P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides were found to be morphologically similar.P. aegyptiacus was also placed close toP. amboinicus and, lastly,P. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus were grouped together as well as seen in Cluster G.Epidermal cell type, type of stomata, type of trichome, and the nature of the mesophyll have been used before to differentiateP. barbatus andP. neochilus from other South American Labiatae species referred by the same common name [14].P. barbatus was reported to possess anomocytic stomata, dorsiventral mesophyll, capitate glandular trichomes, and polygonal epidermal cells [14]. Such findings on leaf anatomical characters ofP. barbatus have been supported by the results of the current study. Four types of glandular trichomes of taxonomic significance on the abaxial surface of leaves have been reported in various developmental stages ofP. ornatus. These include long-stalked capitate trichomes, short-stalked capitate trichome, and digitiform and conoidal trichomes [18] and this supports the current study wherebyP. ornatus was found to possess long-stalked glandular trichomes.P. montanus andP. pseudomarrubioides have been reported to have short-stalked peltate trichomes [35] and this likewise corroborates the current leaf micromorphology study where the two species have been reported to have short-stalked trichomes.P. amboinicus was reported to have rectangular to polygonal leaf epidermal cells with more glandular than nonglandular trichomes on both the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces [36]. In addition, the leaf mesophyll ofP. amboinicus was also described to be homogenous consisting of undifferentiated compact square-like cells [36]. These results of leaf micromorphology ofP. amboinicus were in agreement with the results obtained in the current study wherebyP. amboinicus was reported to have homogenous mesophyll and short-stalked trichomes. Generally, isobilateral, centric, or dorsiventral leaf mesophyll has been reported in species within the Lamiaceae family [16].Organisms grouped together in a dendrogram imply that they are more similar morphologically. In most cases similarity based on morphology is related to genetic similarity because traits are determined by genes and a similar character in different plants strongly suggests that there is a shared gene by those species possessing the morphological character. Hence, it can be assumed that, the more close the species are grouped, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor. Morphological characters are often affected by environmental factors and morphological variation seen in species can either be environmentally induced or genetically based [37]. The same species growing in different ecological zones can display varied morphological characters. For example, by referring to the leaf micromorphology dendrogram, Cluster F shows thatP. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides have been grouped together andP. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been grouped together as well in Cluster G. Such a grouping based on character can similarly be attributed to environmental influence on the species growing in their habitats.P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides were collected in dry regions of Kenya which were Olorgesailie, Makueni, and Naivasha. respectively, whileP. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus were collected from wet regions in Kenya which were Trans-nzoia, Nairobi, and Nairobi, respectively. This may strongly suggest that the environment might have influenced their stomata density and other leaf micromorphology characters making the species possess near similar characters hence after the cluster analysis they were grouped together.As mentioned before, a dendrogram produced from cluster analysis of gross morphological characters described in the Flora of Tropical East Africa (Figure7) groups the tenPlectranthus species into two main groups: Cluster H and Cluster I. By comparing the gross morphological dendrogram (Cluster H and I) with the leaf micromorphology dendrogram (Cluster F and G), some similarities between the two can be deduced. For instance,P. lanuginosus,P. edulis, andP. barbatus have been grouped together by the two dendrograms (Cluster G and H). SimilarlyP. montanus andP. pseudomarrubioides have been grouped together in the two dendrograms (Cluster F and I). One major similarity between the leaf micromorphology dendrogram and the molecular phylogenetic trees include placement ofP. barbatus andP. lanuginosus in the same group. Other species which have been placed in the same group by both the leaf micromorphology dendrogram and the molecular phylogenetic trees areP. pseudomarrubioides,P. montanous, andP. ornatus. This clearly shows that the obtained leaf micromorphology data is supported by molecular data from theMatK andRbcl sequences. This strongly implies thatP. barbatus andP. lanuginosus are closely related and the same conclusion of close relatedness can be made onP. pseudomarrubioides,P. montanus, andP. ornatus.Findings of the leaf micromorphology study have been supported by previous classification based on their ethnobotanical uses where most of the species belonging toColeus clade were grouped together by Lukhoba et al. [2].P. montanus was placed in the same group withP. pseudomarrubioides,P. amboinicus was placed together withP. aegyptiacus, whileP. barbatus,P. caninus, andP. lanuginosus were grouped together as well [2]. A study carried out by Khalik using ultrastructure characters of pollen grains and trichomes to classify Saudi ArabianPlectranthus species showed thatP. montanus andP. pseudomarrubioides were closely related to each other [35] and this agrees with the current study whereby the two species have been grouped together.Morphological characters have been employed widely in the identification and classification of plants. In closely related species, these morphological characters may differ by a small margin and it may not be easy to identify and classify closely related species. Studies on leaf micromorphology are important sources of taxonomic characters for classification of plants which are difficult to delimit. Some of these characters are of diagnostic value and have been used successfully in infrageneric and interspecific classification in plants. Most morphological characters overlap when we look at species at the lower taxonomic ranks especially in genus and subgenus levels making it hard to classify species based on the general morphological characters. As a result diagnostic morphological characters are vital when it comes to morphology based phylogenetic studies. Micromorphological characters are examples of such diagnostic characters which have proved vital in the delimitation of species below the genus level [38, 39].Based on the current leaf micromorphology study epidermal cell type, type and nature of trichomes, mesophyll type, and palisade layer have proved to be vital diagnostic characters for differentiating the ten species investigated, while characters such as the presence or absence of a succulent leaf, type of stomata, number of stomata, and occurrence of stomata have been shown to be less important in differentiating the ten species. Dendrogram produced from the leaf micromorphology characters classifies the tenPlectranthus species in a pattern which has been supported by previous researchers. Hence, the current study has proved that studies of leaf micromorphology can aid in determination of diagnostic morphological characters which can aid in plant delimitation and phylogenetic studies.With regard to molecular phylogeny, phylogenetic trees reconstructed based on theMatK and theRbcl gene sequences have showed phylogenetic relationships among the tenPlectranthus species and proved that the species are actually monophyletic in origin. Furthermore, the results obtained were in congruent with results obtained by previous researchers on phylogeny of thePlectranthus genus as far as the ten species are concerned. The study proved that molecular characters are indeed valuable in phylogenetic studies especially in the lower taxonomic ranks whereby morphological characters may not delimit species successfully.


## 3.1. Molecular Phylogeny of TenPlectranthus Species

After DNA sequencing,MatK andRbcl genes from the tenPlectranthus species were deposited in the nucleotide database of GenBank. The assigned GenBank accession numbers (MF495684–MF495703) are presented in Table 2.Table 2
GenBank accession numbers for genes from the tenPlectranthus species.
Plectranthus species
Gene
GenBank accession number
Gene
GenBank accession number
P. barbatus
MatK
MF495684
Rbcl
MF495698
P. edulis
MatK
MF495685
Rbcl
MF495696
P. montanus
MatK
MF495686
Rbcl
MF495700
P. amboinicus
MatK
MF495687
Rbcl
MF495701
P. lanuginosus
MatK
MF495688
Rbcl
MF495699
P. otostegioides
MatK
MF495689
Rbcl
MF495703
P. ornatus
MatK
MF495690
Rbcl
MF495695
P. aegyptiacus
MatK
MF495691
Rbcl
MF495702
P. caninus
MatK
MF495692
Rbcl
MF495697
P. pseudomarrubioides
MatK
MF495693
Rbcl
MF495694Aligned sequences were used in the creation of phylogenetic trees following maximum composite likelihood model and employing UPGMA and Bootstrap resampling as a statistical method and as a test of phylogeny, respectively. The most likely phylogenetic trees were constructed using gene sequences from the tenPlectranthus species as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
A bootstrap consensus phylogenetic tree based onMatK gene sequences.The numbers at branch nodes are bootstrap values which indicate percentage number of bootstrap iterations which support the tree at that particular point of divergence/at each node of the phylogenetic tree. The higher the bootstrap value, the more the topology of the phylogenetic tree is supported. Species close to each other in the phylogenetic tree are closely related. BasedMatK gene sequences,P. caninus,P. otostegioides,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus, have been shown to be closely related (Cluster A), this clade has a moderate bootstrap support value of 58, whileP. ornatus,P. pseudomarrubioides, andP. aegyptiacus have been grouped together (Cluster B) and this grouping has a bootstrap value of 34 implying it is poorly supported. The phylogenetic tree also shows thatP. montanus andP. amboinicus are closely related and form a monophyletic group (Cluster C) which has a moderate bootstrap support value of 52. All the species share a distant common ancestor withP. edulis.Based on theRbcl gene sequences,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. montanous,P.ornatus,P. amboinicus, andP. edulis have also been grouped together (Cluster D), whileP. caninus,P. lanuginosus,P. barbatus, andP. otostegioides have also been grouped together (Cluster E) and both groups are related toP. aegyptiacus which is grouped alone. Cluster D has a moderate bootstrap support value of 54, while Cluster E is well supported with a high bootstrap value of 87.BothMatK andRbcl phylogenetic trees are strikingly similar. For example, based on theMatK genes,P. caninus,P. otostegioides,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been grouped together and all the four species form a monophyletic group (Cluster A). The same pattern can be observed in the phylogenetic tree created using theRbcl genes (Cluster E). Again based on theMatK genes,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. ornatus,P. montanus, andP. amboinicus have been showed to be closely related (Cluster B). This close relationship of these species can also be observed in phylogenetic trees produced using theRbcl genes (Cluster D). However, based onMatK genes,P. aegyptiacus has been shown to be closely related toP. pseudomarrubioides andP. ornatus (Cluster B), while based on theRbcl genes,P. edulis is closely related toP. amboinicus,P. ornatus,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. amboinicus, andP. montanus (Cluster D).


## 3.2. Leaf Micromorphology ofPlectranthus Species

### 3.2.1. Leaf Micromorphology ofPlectranthus Species

Overall variations in leaf anatomical characters observed in three individuals of each of the tenPlectranthus species are tabulated in Table 3. The characters include nature of the leaf, stomata occurrence, stomata type, epidermal cell type, trichome type, glandular trichomes, nature of the mesophyll, nature of the palisade layer, and the number of stomata on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces.Table 3
Leaf micromorphology in the tenPlectranthus species.
Species
Nature of the leaf
Stomata occurrence
Stomata type
Epidermal cell type
Trichome type
Glandular trichomes
Mesophyll
Palisade layer
Average number of stomata on the abaxial surface
Average number of stomata on the adaxial surface
P. caninus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
Long- stalked
Present
Dorsiventral
Long columnar cells
35
25
P. aegyptiacus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
50
36
P. edulis
Nonsucculent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
Short-stalked
Absent
Dorsiventral
Long columnar cells
47
35
P. pseudomarrubioides
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
36
25
P. barbatus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
Capitate
Present
Dorsiventral
Long columnar cells
45
39
P. lanuginosus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
Capitate
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
58
49
P. otostegioides
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
28
20
P. montanus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
28
23
P. ornatus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
long-stalked
Present
Dorsiventral
Long columnar cells
35
27
P. amboinicus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Absent
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
45
33
Sinuous: containing many curved edges,Polygonal: resembling a polygon, anomocytic: surrounded by more than four subsidiary cells, homogenous mesophyll: a mesophyll whose layers are hard to differentiate, dorsiventral mesophyll: a mesophyll with distinct dorsal and ventral surfaces, capitate: a trichome culminating in a compact head, Ad: adaxial leaf surface, and Ab: abaxial leaf surface.Leaf anatomical characters which contributed to most of the differences among the tenPlectranthus investigated include epidermal cell type which was either sinuous (Figure 3) or polygonal (Figure 4), trichome type which ranged from being long-stalked, short-stalked, glandular, and nonglandular to capitate (Figure 5), nature of the leaf mesophyll which was either dorsiventral (whereby upper epidermis, palisade layer, spongy mesophyll, and lower epidermis were easily identified as distinct) or homogenous (whereby the various layers of the leaf mesophyll were indiscreet and not easily identified) (Figures 3 and 4). For thePlectranthus species with dorsiventral mesophyll, the palisade layer could easily be identified bearing the usual long columnar cells while for those with homogenous mesophyll, the palisade layer was inconspicuous just like the other layers of that homogenous mesophyll. The average number of stomata on both sides was highest inP. barbatus,P. amboinicus,P. aegyptiacus,P. lanuginosus, andP.edulis. Fewer numbers of stomata were observed inP. pseudomarrubioides,P. otostegioides, andP. montanus. In all the species, fewer numbers of stomata were observed in the adaxial surface compared to the abaxial surface (Table 3).


### 3.2.2. Dendrogram Based on the Leaf Micromorphology Data

Leaf micromorphology data was subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis. Character states were assigned values and scored in a matrix, the matrix (Table4) was subjected to cluster analysis.Table 4
Leaf micromorphology character states matrix of the tenPlectranthus species.
Plectranthus species
Leaf micromorphology characters from the tenPlectranthus species
Succulent leaf
Stomata distribution
Stomata type
Epidermal Cell type
Trichome type
Glandular Trichomes
Nature of mesophyll
Palisade layer
Stomata no. (adaxial)
Stomata no. (abaxial)
P. caninus
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
Character state scores/values
P. aegyptiacus
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
P. edulis
2.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
P. seudomarruboides
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
P. barbatus
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 & 3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
P. lanuginosus
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 & 3.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
4.00
5.00
P. otostegioides
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
P. montanous
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
P. ornatus
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 & 3.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
P. amboinicus
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
Succulent leaf: 1 (present), 2 (absent), stomata occurrence: 1 (adaxial surface), 2 (Abaxial surface), and 3 (both surfaces), stomata type: 1 (anomocytic), epidermal cell type: 1 (sinuous), 2 (polygonal), trichome type: 1 (long-stalked), 2 (short-stalked), and 3 (capitate), glandulartrichomes: 1 (present), 2 (absent), and 3 (both glandular and nonglandular trichomes present), mesophyll: 1 (homogenous), 2 (dorsiventral), palisade layer: 1 (normal long columnar cells), 2 (inconspicuous), stomata number on the adaxial surface: 1 (<20 stomata), 2 (20–30 stomata), 3 (30–40 stomata), 4 (40–50 stomata), and 5 (>50 stomata), stomata number on the abaxial surface: 1 (<20 stomata), 2 (20–30 stomata), 3 (30–40 stomata), 4 (40–50 stomata), and 5 (>50 stomata).Hierarchical cluster analysis of the leaf micromorphology character state matrix in Table4 in SPSS led to the average linkage dendrogram (Figure 6).P. caninus,P. ornatus,P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides were together in one group (Cluster F), whileP. aegyptiacus,P. amboinicus,P. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been placed in another group (Cluster G). The inner branches of the dendrogram show thatP. caninus is similar toP. ornatus.P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides are likewise similar, hence, they have been grouped together.P. aegyptiacus has also been placed close toP. amboinicus and, lastly,P. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been grouped together as well (Figure 6).


### 3.2.3. Dendrogram Based on Morphological Characters Described in the FTEA

Using gross morphological characters of the tenPlectranthus species previously described in Table 1, the following character state matrix (Table 5) was created and subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis.Table 5
Gross morphology character state matrix of the tenPlectranthus species.
Plectranthusspecies
Gross morphological characters from the tenPlectranthus species
Succulent leaf
Height
Inflorescence
Cymes
Pedicel length
Calyx length
Calyx nature
Corolla length
Corolla colour
Leaf apex
Bracts
Nutlets
Staminal filaments
Leaf blade
Petiole
Stems
Stems colour
Eglandular hairs
Stems shape
P. barbatus
1.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Character state scores/values
P. caninus
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
P. montanus
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
4.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
P. otostegioides
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
P. lanuginosus
1.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
P. pseudomarrubioides
1.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
5.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
P. edulis
2.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
1.00
P. ornatus
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
P. aegyptiacus
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
P. amboinicus
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
Succulent leaf: 1 (present), 2 (absent), height: 1 (<0.3 m), 2 (0.3–0.5 m), 3 (0.5–1 m), and 4 (>1 m), inflorescence: 1 (with <10 flowered verticils), 2 (with 10–20 flowered verticils), and 3 (with >20 flowered verticils), cymes: 1 (<5 flowered), 2 (5–10 flowered), and 3 (>10 flowered), pedicel length: 1 (<3 mm long), 2 (3–6 mm long), and 3 (>6 mm long), calyx length: 1 (<2 mm long), 2 (2–4 mm long), and 3 (>4 mm long), nature of calyx: 1 (pubescent), 2 (tomentose), 3 (villose), and 4 (pubescent to villose), corolla length: 1 (<10 mm long), 2 (10–20 mm long), and 3 (>30 mm long), corolla colour: 1 (blue to purple with white marks), 2 (white with white marks), 3 (pale blue to lilac), and 4 (blue with purple marks), leaf apex: 1 (obtuse to rounded), 2 (obtuse), and 3 (acute to rounded), bracts: 1 (ovate, apiculate), 2 (ovate), 3 (ovate to elliptic), 4 (obovate to elliptic), and 5 (broadly elliptic), nutlets: 1 (brown with reddish dots), 2 (brown with dark dots), and 3 (dark grey with dark dots), staminal filaments: 1 (fused), 2 (free), Leaf blade: 1 (elliptic, ovate, obovate), 2 (triangular), and 3 (trullate, rhombic), petiole length: 1 (<10 mm long), 2 (10–20 mm long), 3 (20–50 mm long), and 4 (epetiolate/sessile), stem: 1 (succulent), 2 (nonsucculent/soft wooded), stem colour: 1 (sometimes purplish above), 2 (pinkish to dark red), and 3 (unknown), eglandular hairs: 1 (antrose and patent), 2 (patent), 3 (retrose and patent), and 4 (unknown), stem shape: 1 (rounded and quadrangular).Hierarchical cluster analysis of the above gross morphology character state matrix (Table5) resulted in the following average linkage dendrogram (Figure 7). The dendrogram shows taxonomic relationships among thePlectranthus species based on gross morphological characters as described in FTEA [5].Two main clusters/groups are evident from the dendrogram above which occur at about the same horizontal distance. One cluster (H) containsP. lanuginosus,P. edulis,P. barbatus,P. caninus,P. otostegioides, andP. ornatus. The other cluster (I) containsP. montanus,P. amboinicus,P. pseudomarrubioides, andP. aegyptiacus. Cluster H further showsP. lanuginosus,P. edulis, and P. barbatus have been grouped together andP. caninus,P. otostegioides, andP. ornatus have been grouped together as well. This implies that members within each cluster are very close morphologically (Figure 7).


## 3.2.1. Leaf Micromorphology ofPlectranthus Species

Overall variations in leaf anatomical characters observed in three individuals of each of the tenPlectranthus species are tabulated in Table 3. The characters include nature of the leaf, stomata occurrence, stomata type, epidermal cell type, trichome type, glandular trichomes, nature of the mesophyll, nature of the palisade layer, and the number of stomata on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces.Table 3
Leaf micromorphology in the tenPlectranthus species.
Species
Nature of the leaf
Stomata occurrence
Stomata type
Epidermal cell type
Trichome type
Glandular trichomes
Mesophyll
Palisade layer
Average number of stomata on the abaxial surface
Average number of stomata on the adaxial surface
P. caninus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
Long- stalked
Present
Dorsiventral
Long columnar cells
35
25
P. aegyptiacus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
50
36
P. edulis
Nonsucculent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
Short-stalked
Absent
Dorsiventral
Long columnar cells
47
35
P. pseudomarrubioides
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
36
25
P. barbatus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
Capitate
Present
Dorsiventral
Long columnar cells
45
39
P. lanuginosus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
Capitate
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
58
49
P. otostegioides
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
28
20
P. montanus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Present
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
28
23
P. ornatus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Polygonal
long-stalked
Present
Dorsiventral
Long columnar cells
35
27
P. amboinicus
Succulent
Ab/Ad
Anomocytic
Sinuous
Short-stalked
Absent
Homogenous
Inconspicuous
45
33
Sinuous: containing many curved edges,Polygonal: resembling a polygon, anomocytic: surrounded by more than four subsidiary cells, homogenous mesophyll: a mesophyll whose layers are hard to differentiate, dorsiventral mesophyll: a mesophyll with distinct dorsal and ventral surfaces, capitate: a trichome culminating in a compact head, Ad: adaxial leaf surface, and Ab: abaxial leaf surface.Leaf anatomical characters which contributed to most of the differences among the tenPlectranthus investigated include epidermal cell type which was either sinuous (Figure 3) or polygonal (Figure 4), trichome type which ranged from being long-stalked, short-stalked, glandular, and nonglandular to capitate (Figure 5), nature of the leaf mesophyll which was either dorsiventral (whereby upper epidermis, palisade layer, spongy mesophyll, and lower epidermis were easily identified as distinct) or homogenous (whereby the various layers of the leaf mesophyll were indiscreet and not easily identified) (Figures 3 and 4). For thePlectranthus species with dorsiventral mesophyll, the palisade layer could easily be identified bearing the usual long columnar cells while for those with homogenous mesophyll, the palisade layer was inconspicuous just like the other layers of that homogenous mesophyll. The average number of stomata on both sides was highest inP. barbatus,P. amboinicus,P. aegyptiacus,P. lanuginosus, andP.edulis. Fewer numbers of stomata were observed inP. pseudomarrubioides,P. otostegioides, andP. montanus. In all the species, fewer numbers of stomata were observed in the adaxial surface compared to the abaxial surface (Table 3).


## 3.2.2. Dendrogram Based on the Leaf Micromorphology Data

Leaf micromorphology data was subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis. Character states were assigned values and scored in a matrix, the matrix (Table4) was subjected to cluster analysis.Table 4
Leaf micromorphology character states matrix of the tenPlectranthus species.
Plectranthus species
Leaf micromorphology characters from the tenPlectranthus species
Succulent leaf
Stomata distribution
Stomata type
Epidermal Cell type
Trichome type
Glandular Trichomes
Nature of mesophyll
Palisade layer
Stomata no. (adaxial)
Stomata no. (abaxial)
P. caninus
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
Character state scores/values
P. aegyptiacus
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
P. edulis
2.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
P. seudomarruboides
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
P. barbatus
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 & 3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
P. lanuginosus
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 & 3.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
4.00
5.00
P. otostegioides
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
P. montanous
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
P. ornatus
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 & 3.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
P. amboinicus
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
Succulent leaf: 1 (present), 2 (absent), stomata occurrence: 1 (adaxial surface), 2 (Abaxial surface), and 3 (both surfaces), stomata type: 1 (anomocytic), epidermal cell type: 1 (sinuous), 2 (polygonal), trichome type: 1 (long-stalked), 2 (short-stalked), and 3 (capitate), glandulartrichomes: 1 (present), 2 (absent), and 3 (both glandular and nonglandular trichomes present), mesophyll: 1 (homogenous), 2 (dorsiventral), palisade layer: 1 (normal long columnar cells), 2 (inconspicuous), stomata number on the adaxial surface: 1 (<20 stomata), 2 (20–30 stomata), 3 (30–40 stomata), 4 (40–50 stomata), and 5 (>50 stomata), stomata number on the abaxial surface: 1 (<20 stomata), 2 (20–30 stomata), 3 (30–40 stomata), 4 (40–50 stomata), and 5 (>50 stomata).Hierarchical cluster analysis of the leaf micromorphology character state matrix in Table4 in SPSS led to the average linkage dendrogram (Figure 6).P. caninus,P. ornatus,P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides were together in one group (Cluster F), whileP. aegyptiacus,P. amboinicus,P. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been placed in another group (Cluster G). The inner branches of the dendrogram show thatP. caninus is similar toP. ornatus.P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides are likewise similar, hence, they have been grouped together.P. aegyptiacus has also been placed close toP. amboinicus and, lastly,P. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been grouped together as well (Figure 6).


## 3.2.3. Dendrogram Based on Morphological Characters Described in the FTEA

Using gross morphological characters of the tenPlectranthus species previously described in Table 1, the following character state matrix (Table 5) was created and subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis.Table 5
Gross morphology character state matrix of the tenPlectranthus species.
Plectranthusspecies
Gross morphological characters from the tenPlectranthus species
Succulent leaf
Height
Inflorescence
Cymes
Pedicel length
Calyx length
Calyx nature
Corolla length
Corolla colour
Leaf apex
Bracts
Nutlets
Staminal filaments
Leaf blade
Petiole
Stems
Stems colour
Eglandular hairs
Stems shape
P. barbatus
1.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Character state scores/values
P. caninus
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
P. montanus
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
4.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
P. otostegioides
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
P. lanuginosus
1.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
P. pseudomarrubioides
1.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
5.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
P. edulis
2.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
1.00
P. ornatus
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
4.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
P. aegyptiacus
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
P. amboinicus
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
Succulent leaf: 1 (present), 2 (absent), height: 1 (<0.3 m), 2 (0.3–0.5 m), 3 (0.5–1 m), and 4 (>1 m), inflorescence: 1 (with <10 flowered verticils), 2 (with 10–20 flowered verticils), and 3 (with >20 flowered verticils), cymes: 1 (<5 flowered), 2 (5–10 flowered), and 3 (>10 flowered), pedicel length: 1 (<3 mm long), 2 (3–6 mm long), and 3 (>6 mm long), calyx length: 1 (<2 mm long), 2 (2–4 mm long), and 3 (>4 mm long), nature of calyx: 1 (pubescent), 2 (tomentose), 3 (villose), and 4 (pubescent to villose), corolla length: 1 (<10 mm long), 2 (10–20 mm long), and 3 (>30 mm long), corolla colour: 1 (blue to purple with white marks), 2 (white with white marks), 3 (pale blue to lilac), and 4 (blue with purple marks), leaf apex: 1 (obtuse to rounded), 2 (obtuse), and 3 (acute to rounded), bracts: 1 (ovate, apiculate), 2 (ovate), 3 (ovate to elliptic), 4 (obovate to elliptic), and 5 (broadly elliptic), nutlets: 1 (brown with reddish dots), 2 (brown with dark dots), and 3 (dark grey with dark dots), staminal filaments: 1 (fused), 2 (free), Leaf blade: 1 (elliptic, ovate, obovate), 2 (triangular), and 3 (trullate, rhombic), petiole length: 1 (<10 mm long), 2 (10–20 mm long), 3 (20–50 mm long), and 4 (epetiolate/sessile), stem: 1 (succulent), 2 (nonsucculent/soft wooded), stem colour: 1 (sometimes purplish above), 2 (pinkish to dark red), and 3 (unknown), eglandular hairs: 1 (antrose and patent), 2 (patent), 3 (retrose and patent), and 4 (unknown), stem shape: 1 (rounded and quadrangular).Hierarchical cluster analysis of the above gross morphology character state matrix (Table5) resulted in the following average linkage dendrogram (Figure 7). The dendrogram shows taxonomic relationships among thePlectranthus species based on gross morphological characters as described in FTEA [5].Two main clusters/groups are evident from the dendrogram above which occur at about the same horizontal distance. One cluster (H) containsP. lanuginosus,P. edulis,P. barbatus,P. caninus,P. otostegioides, andP. ornatus. The other cluster (I) containsP. montanus,P. amboinicus,P. pseudomarrubioides, andP. aegyptiacus. Cluster H further showsP. lanuginosus,P. edulis, and P. barbatus have been grouped together andP. caninus,P. otostegioides, andP. ornatus have been grouped together as well. This implies that members within each cluster are very close morphologically (Figure 7).


## 3.3. Discussion

Based on the current study, theMatK andRbcl genes from tenPlectranthus species have been sequenced and phylogenetic trees have been reconstructed from the sequences. Based on theMatK gene sequences,P. caninus,P. otostegioides,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been grouped together (Cluster A), whileP. ornatus,P. pseudomarrubioides, andP. aegyptiacus have been grouped together in another group, Cluster B (Figure 1). Species grouped together imply that they share a close common ancestor. The phylogenetic tree also shows thatP. montanus andP. amboinicus form another group (Cluster C) and all the species share a distance common ancestor withP. edulis. On the other hand, a phylogenetic tree reconstructed based on theRbcl gene sequences grouped togetherP. pseudomarrubioides,P. montanus,P. ornatus,P. amboinicus, andP. edulis (Cluster D), indicating that these four species are closely related (Figure 2). TheRbcl phylogenetic tree also grouped togetherP. caninus,P. lanuginosus,P. barbatus, andP. otostegioides forming another group (Cluster E), also indicating that both groups are related toP. aegyptiacus which is grouped alone. From the results, it may be argued that theMatK gene is better in delimitingP. aegyptiacus and, likewise, theRbcl gene is better in delimitingP. edulis among species within theColeus clade.Figure 2
A bootstrap consensus phylogenetic tree based onRbcl gene sequences.Figure 3
(a) Transverse section ofP. lanuginosus leaf (mg = ×100) showing homogenous mesophyll, sinuous epidermal cells, and long-stalked trichomes. (b) Abaxial surface ofP. pseudomarrubioides leaf (mg = ×400) showing anomocytic stomata.
(a)
(b)Figure 4
Transverse section ofP. ornatus leaf. This pattern inP. ornatus of long columnar cells, long-stalked trichomes, dorsiventral mesophyll, and polygonal epidermal cells was also observed inP. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. caninus.Figure 5
Trichomes identified inPlectranthus species: (A) long-stalked glandular trichome (inP. caninus andP. ornatus), (B) short-stalked glandular trichome (inP. aegyptiacus,P. edulis,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. amboinicus), (C) capitate nonstalked trichome (inP. ornatus), (D) nonglandular trichomes (inP. ornatus), (E) capitate glandular trichome (inP. lanuginosus andP. barbatus), and (F) capitate glands (inP. ornatus).Figure 6
Leaf micromorphology average linkage dendrogram.Figure 7
Average linkage dendrogram showing taxonomic relationships of the tenPlectranthus species based on morphological characters in the FTEA.Comparison of the two trees based on theMatK and theRbcl analyses shows that they are very similar. For example based on theMatK genes,P. caninus,P. otostegioides,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been grouped together. The same pattern can be observed in the phylogenetic tree created using theRbcl genes implying that Cluster A based on theMatK genes is similar to Cluster E based on theRbcl genes. Again based on theMatK genes,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. ornatus,P. montanus, andP. amboinicus have been shown to be closely related. This close relationship of these species can also be observed in phylogenetic tree produced using theRbcl genes which likewise implies that Cluster B based on theMatK genes is similar to Cluster D based on theRbcl genes. Based on theMatK genes,P. aegyptiacus was shown to be closely related toP. pseudomarrubioides andP. ornatus, while based on theRbcl genes,P. edulis is closely related toP. amboinicus,P. ornatus,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. amboinicus, andP. montanus. Generally species grouped together in phylogenetic trees imply that they share a more recent ancestor.Plectranthus species have been classified based on their ethnobotanical uses by Lukhoba et al. [2]. In that study, the authors were able to assign all thePlectranthus species in this study to theColeus clade. Further,P. montanus was grouped together withP. pseudomarrubioides,P. amboinicus was grouped together withP. aegyptiacus, whileP. barbatus,P. caninus, andP. lanuginosus were grouped together [2]. Their findings are similar to the observation in this study based on theMatK andRbcl gene sequences.P. montanus andP. pseudomarrubioides have been shown to be closely related andP. barbatus,P. caninus, andP. lanuginosus have been shown to be closely related as well and hence have been grouped together.P. amboinicus grouped together withP. montanus was shown to be distantly related toP. barbatus based on phylogenetic trees reconstructed from three plastid DNA gene sequences:trnL intron,trnL-trnF intergene spacer, andrps16 gene by Paton et al. [4]. In addition, Al-Qurainy et al. [6] likewise observed thatP. amboinicus was closely related toP. montanus. Such findings are supported by the results in the current study where byMatK andRbcl phylogenetic trees showed thatP. amboinicus was closely related toP. montanus, but distantly related toP. barbatus. In addition, the phylogenetic tree reconstructed by Al-Qurainy et al. [6] based onnrITS gene also indicated thatP. barbatus was closely related toP. caninus. The findings by Paton et al. [4] and Al-Qurainy et al. [6] are in line with the data in the current study based on theMatK andRbcl which have grouped togetherP. amboinicus andP. montanus and also grouped togetherP. barbatus andP. caninus, implying that these pairs of species are closely related.A dendrogram produced from the cluster analysis of morphological characters described in the Flora of Tropical East Africa (Figure7) showed two main groups: Cluster H and Cluster I. Cluster H contained the speciesP. lanuginosus,P. edulis,P. barbatus,P. caninus,P. otostegioides, andP. ornatus, while Cluster I containedP. montanus,P. amboinicus,P. pseudomarrubioides, andP. aegyptiacus. Inner branches of Cluster H further showed thatP. lanuginosus,P. edulis, and P. barbatus were morphologically similar andP. caninus,P. otostegioides, andP. ornatus are morphologically similar as well hence they have been grouped together. Morphological similarity in most cases is correlated to genetic similarity [34]. Hence, these close relations based on morphology within each group implied that members within each group were closely related. Such relationships ofPlectranthus species described in the FTEA were very similar to what has been observed from the phylogenetic trees created from theMatK andRbcl gene sequences in the current study.Grayer investigated the distribution of exudate flavonoids inPlectranthus species and consequently came up with a phylogenetic tree based on the distribution of the exudate flavonoids [3]. Of particular interest to the current study areP. aegyptiacus,P. pseudomarrubioides, andP. montanus which are among thePlectranthus species Grayer investigated [3]. The study reported that bothP. pseudomarrubioides andP. montanus produce Quercetin 3-methyl ether and Quercetin 3,7-dimethyl ether and also reported that bothP. pseudomarrubioides andP. aegyptiacus produced Cirsimaritin [3]. This implies thatP. pseudomarrubioides is genetically similar to bothP. aegyptiacus andP. montanus and this supports the findings of the current study.Leaf micromorphology in the present study involved investigation of the internal leaf anatomy and stomatal distribution of the tenPlectranthus species in theColeus clade. Such a study focused on the arrangement of the leaf mesophylls, type of epidermal cells, trichomes, stomata density, stomata type, and stomata occurrence on both the abaxial and adaxial surfaces of the leaves. Data obtained from the study was used to generate average linkage dendrogram for better understanding of the taxonomic relationships between the ten species. Leaf anatomical characters which contributed to most of the differences in the tenPlectranthus investigated included epidermal cell type which was sinuous or polygonal (Figures 3 and 4), trichome type which ranged from being long-stalked, short-stalked, glandular, and nonglandular to capitate (Figure 5), the nature of the leaf mesophyll which was either homogenous or dorsiventral, and the nature of the palisade layer (Figures 3 and 4). From the leaf micromorphology dendrogram (Figure 6), the tenPlectranthus species were grouped into two main groups:P. caninus,P. ornatus,P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides were grouped together in Cluster F, whileP. aegyptiacus,P. amboinicus,P. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus were placed in Cluster G. The inner branches of Cluster F show thatP. caninus is similar toP. ornatus. In addition, by looking at Cluster F,P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides were found to be morphologically similar.P. aegyptiacus was also placed close toP. amboinicus and, lastly,P. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus were grouped together as well as seen in Cluster G.Epidermal cell type, type of stomata, type of trichome, and the nature of the mesophyll have been used before to differentiateP. barbatus andP. neochilus from other South American Labiatae species referred by the same common name [14].P. barbatus was reported to possess anomocytic stomata, dorsiventral mesophyll, capitate glandular trichomes, and polygonal epidermal cells [14]. Such findings on leaf anatomical characters ofP. barbatus have been supported by the results of the current study. Four types of glandular trichomes of taxonomic significance on the abaxial surface of leaves have been reported in various developmental stages ofP. ornatus. These include long-stalked capitate trichomes, short-stalked capitate trichome, and digitiform and conoidal trichomes [18] and this supports the current study wherebyP. ornatus was found to possess long-stalked glandular trichomes.P. montanus andP. pseudomarrubioides have been reported to have short-stalked peltate trichomes [35] and this likewise corroborates the current leaf micromorphology study where the two species have been reported to have short-stalked trichomes.P. amboinicus was reported to have rectangular to polygonal leaf epidermal cells with more glandular than nonglandular trichomes on both the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces [36]. In addition, the leaf mesophyll ofP. amboinicus was also described to be homogenous consisting of undifferentiated compact square-like cells [36]. These results of leaf micromorphology ofP. amboinicus were in agreement with the results obtained in the current study wherebyP. amboinicus was reported to have homogenous mesophyll and short-stalked trichomes. Generally, isobilateral, centric, or dorsiventral leaf mesophyll has been reported in species within the Lamiaceae family [16].Organisms grouped together in a dendrogram imply that they are more similar morphologically. In most cases similarity based on morphology is related to genetic similarity because traits are determined by genes and a similar character in different plants strongly suggests that there is a shared gene by those species possessing the morphological character. Hence, it can be assumed that, the more close the species are grouped, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor. Morphological characters are often affected by environmental factors and morphological variation seen in species can either be environmentally induced or genetically based [37]. The same species growing in different ecological zones can display varied morphological characters. For example, by referring to the leaf micromorphology dendrogram, Cluster F shows thatP. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides have been grouped together andP. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been grouped together as well in Cluster G. Such a grouping based on character can similarly be attributed to environmental influence on the species growing in their habitats.P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides were collected in dry regions of Kenya which were Olorgesailie, Makueni, and Naivasha. respectively, whileP. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus were collected from wet regions in Kenya which were Trans-nzoia, Nairobi, and Nairobi, respectively. This may strongly suggest that the environment might have influenced their stomata density and other leaf micromorphology characters making the species possess near similar characters hence after the cluster analysis they were grouped together.As mentioned before, a dendrogram produced from cluster analysis of gross morphological characters described in the Flora of Tropical East Africa (Figure7) groups the tenPlectranthus species into two main groups: Cluster H and Cluster I. By comparing the gross morphological dendrogram (Cluster H and I) with the leaf micromorphology dendrogram (Cluster F and G), some similarities between the two can be deduced. For instance,P. lanuginosus,P. edulis, andP. barbatus have been grouped together by the two dendrograms (Cluster G and H). SimilarlyP. montanus andP. pseudomarrubioides have been grouped together in the two dendrograms (Cluster F and I). One major similarity between the leaf micromorphology dendrogram and the molecular phylogenetic trees include placement ofP. barbatus andP. lanuginosus in the same group. Other species which have been placed in the same group by both the leaf micromorphology dendrogram and the molecular phylogenetic trees areP. pseudomarrubioides,P. montanous, andP. ornatus. This clearly shows that the obtained leaf micromorphology data is supported by molecular data from theMatK andRbcl sequences. This strongly implies thatP. barbatus andP. lanuginosus are closely related and the same conclusion of close relatedness can be made onP. pseudomarrubioides,P. montanus, andP. ornatus.Findings of the leaf micromorphology study have been supported by previous classification based on their ethnobotanical uses where most of the species belonging toColeus clade were grouped together by Lukhoba et al. [2].P. montanus was placed in the same group withP. pseudomarrubioides,P. amboinicus was placed together withP. aegyptiacus, whileP. barbatus,P. caninus, andP. lanuginosus were grouped together as well [2]. A study carried out by Khalik using ultrastructure characters of pollen grains and trichomes to classify Saudi ArabianPlectranthus species showed thatP. montanus andP. pseudomarrubioides were closely related to each other [35] and this agrees with the current study whereby the two species have been grouped together.Morphological characters have been employed widely in the identification and classification of plants. In closely related species, these morphological characters may differ by a small margin and it may not be easy to identify and classify closely related species. Studies on leaf micromorphology are important sources of taxonomic characters for classification of plants which are difficult to delimit. Some of these characters are of diagnostic value and have been used successfully in infrageneric and interspecific classification in plants. Most morphological characters overlap when we look at species at the lower taxonomic ranks especially in genus and subgenus levels making it hard to classify species based on the general morphological characters. As a result diagnostic morphological characters are vital when it comes to morphology based phylogenetic studies. Micromorphological characters are examples of such diagnostic characters which have proved vital in the delimitation of species below the genus level [38, 39].Based on the current leaf micromorphology study epidermal cell type, type and nature of trichomes, mesophyll type, and palisade layer have proved to be vital diagnostic characters for differentiating the ten species investigated, while characters such as the presence or absence of a succulent leaf, type of stomata, number of stomata, and occurrence of stomata have been shown to be less important in differentiating the ten species. Dendrogram produced from the leaf micromorphology characters classifies the tenPlectranthus species in a pattern which has been supported by previous researchers. Hence, the current study has proved that studies of leaf micromorphology can aid in determination of diagnostic morphological characters which can aid in plant delimitation and phylogenetic studies.With regard to molecular phylogeny, phylogenetic trees reconstructed based on theMatK and theRbcl gene sequences have showed phylogenetic relationships among the tenPlectranthus species and proved that the species are actually monophyletic in origin. Furthermore, the results obtained were in congruent with results obtained by previous researchers on phylogeny of thePlectranthus genus as far as the ten species are concerned. The study proved that molecular characters are indeed valuable in phylogenetic studies especially in the lower taxonomic ranks whereby morphological characters may not delimit species successfully.


## 4. Conclusions

Plectranthus species are difficult to distinguish morphologically and specific species have been given different names by different authors instead of one legitimate name. Use of morphological characters is not sufficiently enough to delimit the genus successfully. Molecular, anatomical, and biochemical markers are valuable when studying interspecific variation compared to gross morphological markers. By comparing the same gene sequence across species within a genus, a phylogenetic tree can be constructed which can support or give new insights into the existing classification and rule out the confusion brought by synonymy. From the results, a phylogenetic tree reconstructed using theMatK genes groupedP. caninus,P. otostegioides,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus together (Cluster A). Again based on theMatK genes,P. pseudomarrubioides,P. ornatus,P. montanus, andP. amboinicus were shown to be closely related and hence grouped together in Clusters B and C. Still based on theMatK phylogenetic tree, the aforementioned species were shown to share a distant common ancestor withP. edulis. The same trend was observed in the phylogenetic tree created using theRbcl genes sequences (Cluster D and E), although theRbcl phylogenetic tree groupedP. edulis close toP. amboinicus and showedP. aegyptiacus to be distantly related to the other nine species despite being grouped close toP. pseudomarrubioides andP. ornatus by theMatK phylogenetic tree.From the leaf micromorphology study,P. caninus,P. ornatus,P. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides are closely related (Cluster F), whileP. aegyptiacus,P. amboinicus,P. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus are closely related as well (Cluster G). Furthermore, the leaf micromorphology study showed thatP. caninus is closely related toP. ornatus, whileP. otostegioides,P. montanus, andP. pseudomarrubioides have been shown to be related as well.P. aegyptiacus has been placed close toP. amboinicus and lastlyP. edulis,P. barbatus, andP. lanuginosus have been grouped together as well. The findings from the study have been supported by findings from previous morphological, biochemical, and molecular studies which have reported thatPlectranthus species are closely related. It can be concluded that, studies of leaf micromorphology can aid in the determination of diagnostic morphological characters which can aid in plant identification and phylogenetic studies.Analysis of morphological data through cluster analysis groups species together based on their overall similarity and this grouping can be presented in form of cladograms, dendrograms, or even phylogenetic trees. Morphological characters have various shortcomings especially when used to delimit species at the genus level. Most of these characters overlap and it’s hard to identify the diagnostic characters which can be used to differentiate one species from the rest. It has been argued that the most suitable method for classifying species based on morphological data has not yet been decided and different methods applied on the same data can result in different classifications [38]. However, analysis of morphological data can prove valuable when placing a new species within a higher taxonomic rank [40].Although molecular and biochemical data have many advantages and their increase is being used in systematic studies, it is important that morphological systematics should not be entirely abandoned because they can aid in the classification of poorly known groups as well as study of fossil data [41]. The first process of identifying a collected plant species is describing it by listing its morphological characters. Hence, if plant taxonomists focus entirely on molecular and biochemical techniques, then they might not be able to identify new species and research on unidentified species may come to a halt. Correct identification of species in the field and in the herbarium is based on the species morphological data [42].Further research involving morePlectranthus species within theColeus andPlectranthus clade should be conducted to better understand their taxonomic relationships. Roughly one hundredPlectranthus are found in East Africa; about seventy of the species belong to theColeus clade and about thirty of them belong to thePlectranthus clade. Investigations on molecular phylogeny of all the species will help researchers in dealing with the problems of synonymy and placePlectranthus species in their right positions. Such studies will not only involve the use of theMatK and theRbcl genes but it can also involve the use of other molecular markers and methods which have been used successfully in phylogenetic studies of angiosperms such asndh-F,atpB,trnT-trnL,trnL-trnF, andatpB-Rbcl. A comparison of phylogenetic trees based on two or three gene sequences can prove valuable in systematics.Morphological characters are affected by environmental factors and the same morphological character within the same species can be pronounced or decreased depending on the ecological zone where the species is thriving. Hence, it is very important for one to establish whether differences among species observed from morphological characters are due to actual genetic differences or environmental factors. Species classification using morphological data is usually based on diagnostic characters rather than phylogenetic analysis and the classification produced may not give the correct evolutionary relationships of the species involved. For one to make accurate phylogenetic inferences from morphological data dendrograms, it is important to compare such dendrograms with phylogenetic trees based on molecular or biochemical data.



---

*Source: 4369029-2017-12-18.xml*