# Coccophagus scutellaris

Authors: Shaaban Abd-Rabou
Journal: Psyche
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

About 953000 individuals of the cosmopolitan  parasitoid,Coccophagus scutellaris (Dalman) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), were released and evaluated  during 2009-2010 for the control of the following soft scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccidae) infesting the following economic crops in Egypt: Ceroplastes rusci on citrus in Beni Seuf, Ceroplastes floridensis Comstock on citrus in Gharbiya, Coccus hesperidum L. on guava in Giza, Pulvinaria floccifera (Westwood) on mango in Sharqiya, Pulvinaria psidii Maskell on mango in Ismailia, Saissetia coffeae (Walker) on olive in Marsa Matruh, and Saissetia oleae (Oliver) on olive in the Northern Coast. The population of C. scutellaris showed a significant correlation with the build up of the population of the soft scale insects population in all of the release sites studied. The maximum rate of parasitism of  the other species of parasitoids associated with soft scale insects at the release sites decreased after the release of C. scutellaris.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Soft scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccidae) constitute one of the most important groups of pests in agriculture. Many species are destructive especially to fruit trees and ornamentals plants.  Organophosphorus insecticides have been used in an effort to control these pests; however, these products have often been ineffective, costly and have resulted in the contamination of the soil, water, and environment in the areas of Egypt that were previously unpolluted. Whereas biological control of soft scale species has been very effective, with relatively low costs and with little or no negative effects on the environment.The genusCoccophagusWestwood (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) is cosmopolitan in distribution and is comprised of many of the most frequently encountered parasitoids of soft scales, several of which have been used in biological control programs [1]. Coccophagus scutellaris (Dalman) is a cosmopolitan parasitoid of various soft scale species [2] including Coccus longulus (Douglas) [3], Parasaissetia nigra (Nietner) and Parthenolecanium corni (Bouché) [4], Saissetia oleae (Oliver) and Ceroplastes floridensis (Comstock) [5] among other species.   In Egypt,   Priesner  and  Hosny  [6]  recorded this species  associated  with  Coccus  hesperidum L.  and  Pulvinaria floccifera (Westwood). Later, Abd-Rabou [7] added Pulvinaria mesembryanthemi (Vallot) and Saissetia coffeae (Walker) as coccid hosts of this species in Egypt. Bodenheimer [8] and Abd-Rabou et al. [9] recorded C. scutellaris as a common parasitoid of Coccus hesperidumand Ceroplastes floridensis.Coccophagus scutellarisis considered to be an effective parasitoid of Saissetia coffeaeand S. oleaewith maximum parasitism rates of 26 and 22% during November and August 1999, respectively [10]. Currently, it is known to attack six species of soft scales insects in Egypt and is considered to be an effective parasitoid of some of these pests. It is an autoparasitoid; the female is a primary parasitoid of soft scales and the male is a hyperparasitoid of primary parasitoids of soft scales including its own species [4]. During 2009-2010, it was reared and released in different locations in Upper Egypt [11] to control various species of soft scale insects on economic crops.  The release, and establishment of this biological control agent in Egypt allows future studies to be conducted on its effects on the survival of soft scale insects at low population densities.The aim of this work is to clarify the importance of rearing, release and establishment ofCoccophagus scutellarisfor the control of the soft scale insects and to evaluate  its efficacy and the role it plays in controlling of soft scales on  economic crops  in Egypt.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Laboratory Rearing

The parasitoid was reared in three glasshouses. In the first glasshouse, green potato sprouts and tubers were sown in shallow trays, the bottoms of which were perforated with many holes for drainage. The trays were filled with a mixture of equal quantities of loam, sand, and peat moss and irrigated every 1-2 days.  When the sprouts reached approximately 10–12 cm in height, eggs and crawlers ofSaissetia coffeaewere individually scattered on the potato sprouts in the second glasshouse conditioned at 25 ± 2°C, 65% of relative humidity, and 14 hours of light per day. A colony of Coccophagus  scutellariswas initiated in the third glasshouse with specimens that had emergedS.  coffeae in the field and released on a culture of  S.  coffeae(5-6 weeks old). The procedures followed in the treatment experiments were also applied to the control experiment. The development from egg deposition to adult under the above mentioned thermic conditions required 34–36 days. Parasitoids emerging from field and from laboratory rearing were utilized for field releases.


### 2.2. Field Releases

About 963,000 adultC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period 2009-2010 on the following crops and locations: (1) citrus in Beni Seuf  infested with Ceroplastes rusci, (2) citrus in Gharbiya infested with Ceroplastes floridensisComstock, (3) guava in Giza infested with Coccus hesperidumL., (4) mango in Sharqiya infested with Pulvinaria floccifera(Westwood), (5) mango in Ismailia infested with Pulvinaria psidiiMaskell, (6) olive in Marsa Matruh infested withSaissetia coffeae(Walker), and (7) olive in Northern Coast infested withSaissetia oleae(Oliver).  Parasitoids were released as adults by fixing vials or cups containing these parasitoids  on stems of  the various hosts and allowing the adults to exit.


### 2.3. Assessment of Efficacy

The efficacy of released parasitoids was assessed by parasitoid emergence  or dissection of their hosts. Rearing of soft scale stages was achieved by holding a total of 30 leaves each  of citrus, guava, and mango and 60 olive leaves from each site in 0.5 liter cardboard containers with ventilated tops at 25 ± 2°C for two weeks. During 2009-2010, soft scales obtained from 7 locations in Egypt were dissected to detect prepupa and pupa of parasitoids. Samples were collected every month from October 2009 through October 2010.  Three replicates of the study were performed on 1⁄4 feddan (about 0.1 hectares) of each crop.  Each leaf was stored in a well-ventilated emergence glass tube and monitored daily for parasitism which was calculated as follows: (1)Percentage=No.parasitizedNo.parasitized+No.unparasitized.


### 2.4. Statistical Analysis

Simple correlation and regression [12] origin were performed on data to determine the relationship between the populations of C. scutellaris and populations of the various species of soft scales.


## 2.1. Laboratory Rearing

The parasitoid was reared in three glasshouses. In the first glasshouse, green potato sprouts and tubers were sown in shallow trays, the bottoms of which were perforated with many holes for drainage. The trays were filled with a mixture of equal quantities of loam, sand, and peat moss and irrigated every 1-2 days.  When the sprouts reached approximately 10–12 cm in height, eggs and crawlers ofSaissetia coffeaewere individually scattered on the potato sprouts in the second glasshouse conditioned at 25 ± 2°C, 65% of relative humidity, and 14 hours of light per day. A colony of Coccophagus  scutellariswas initiated in the third glasshouse with specimens that had emergedS.  coffeae in the field and released on a culture of  S.  coffeae(5-6 weeks old). The procedures followed in the treatment experiments were also applied to the control experiment. The development from egg deposition to adult under the above mentioned thermic conditions required 34–36 days. Parasitoids emerging from field and from laboratory rearing were utilized for field releases.


## 2.2. Field Releases

About 963,000 adultC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period 2009-2010 on the following crops and locations: (1) citrus in Beni Seuf  infested with Ceroplastes rusci, (2) citrus in Gharbiya infested with Ceroplastes floridensisComstock, (3) guava in Giza infested with Coccus hesperidumL., (4) mango in Sharqiya infested with Pulvinaria floccifera(Westwood), (5) mango in Ismailia infested with Pulvinaria psidiiMaskell, (6) olive in Marsa Matruh infested withSaissetia coffeae(Walker), and (7) olive in Northern Coast infested withSaissetia oleae(Oliver).  Parasitoids were released as adults by fixing vials or cups containing these parasitoids  on stems of  the various hosts and allowing the adults to exit.


## 2.3. Assessment of Efficacy

The efficacy of released parasitoids was assessed by parasitoid emergence  or dissection of their hosts. Rearing of soft scale stages was achieved by holding a total of 30 leaves each  of citrus, guava, and mango and 60 olive leaves from each site in 0.5 liter cardboard containers with ventilated tops at 25 ± 2°C for two weeks. During 2009-2010, soft scales obtained from 7 locations in Egypt were dissected to detect prepupa and pupa of parasitoids. Samples were collected every month from October 2009 through October 2010.  Three replicates of the study were performed on 1⁄4 feddan (about 0.1 hectares) of each crop.  Each leaf was stored in a well-ventilated emergence glass tube and monitored daily for parasitism which was calculated as follows: (1)Percentage=No.parasitizedNo.parasitized+No.unparasitized.


## 2.4. Statistical Analysis

Simple correlation and regression [12] origin were performed on data to determine the relationship between the populations of C. scutellaris and populations of the various species of soft scales.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The efficacy of the release of the individuals  ofC. scutellarisin controlling different species of soft scales on different crops and locations in Egypt was evaluated .


### 3.1. Ceroplastes floridensis on Citrus in Gharbiya

About  136,000 adults ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period of 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 1). The buildup of the population of C. scutellaris in the Gharbiya governorate on citrus correlated with that of  C. floridensis (r=0.973) with simple regression values of  b=0.311, R2=0.951, and P<.01. Parasitism reached a maximum of 22.1% during October 2010 in the treatment plot (after release) while a maximum of 1.8% was reached during October 2009 in the control plot (before release). Parasitism by  the other associated primary parasitoids Microterys flavus (Howard) and Metaphycus flavus (Howard)  decreased from 1.4 to 1.1% and from 1.4 to 0.8%,  respectively, after the release of  C. scutellaris (Figures 1 and 2).Table 1
Total numbers of  the adult parasitoidCoccophagus scutellaris released in different  fields of citrus, guava, mango, olive in Beni Seuf, Gharbiya, Giza, Ismailia, Marsa Matruh,  Northern Coast, and Sharqiya    governorates in Egypt during each year from 2009/2010.
MonthNo. of released   parasitoids  by scale insect speciesCeroplastes floridensisCeroplastes rusciCoccus hesperidumPulvinaria flocciferaPulvinaria psidiiSaissetia coffeaeSaissetia oleaeOct.100001100090001100090001200010000Nov.1000011000800010000110001100010000Dec.1200010000110001100011000110009000Jan.11000100001000011000100001000011000Feb.1200010000110001100011000110009000March10000110001100010000120001100010000April900010000100001100010000100009000May11000100001200011000100001000011000June10000110001200010000110001200010000July1000090001100010000110001100012000Aug.10000110001100010000120001100010000Sept.11000120001000011000120001000010000Oct.10000110001200010000110001000013000Total136000137000138000127000141000140000134000Figure 1
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Ceroplastes floridensison citrus in Gharbiya governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 2
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Ceroplastes floridensison citrus in Gharbiya governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.


### 3.2. Ceroplastes rusci on Citrus in Beni Seuf

About  137,000 adult ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period of 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 3). The buildup of the population of C. scutellaris in the Beni Seuf governorate on citrus correlated with that of C. rusci(r=0.813) with simple regression to these revealed values of b=0.311, R2=0.804, and P<.01. Parasitism reached a maximum of 15.9% during Oct. 2010 in the treatment plot (after the release), while parasitism reached a maximum 1.3% during Oct. 2010 in the control plot (before the release). Parasitism by  the primary parasitoidMetaphycus zebratus (Mercet) and the egg predator, Sutellista caerulea (Boyer de Fonscolombe), decreased from 3.8 to 1.1%  and  from 10.4 to 2.4%, respectively, after the release of C. scutellaris (Figures 3 and 4).Figure 3
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Ceroplastes ruscion citrus in Beni Seuf governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 4
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Ceroplastes ruscion citrus in Beni Seuf governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.


### 3.3. Coccus hesperidum on Guava in Giza

About  138,000 adult ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period of 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 5). The buildup of the population C. scutellaris in the Giza governorate on guava correlated with that of C. hesperidumpopulation buildup (r=0.870) with simple regression values of b=0.301, R2=0.842, and P<.01. Maximum parasitism reached 21.5% during Oct. 2010 in the treatment plot (after release), while maximum parasitism reached 1.3% during November 2009 in the control plot (before release). Parasitism by the egg parasitoid, Alaptus pallidicornis Förster, decreased from 1.4 to 1.1% after the release (Figures 5 and 6).Figure 5
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoid of Coccus hesperidumon guava in Giza governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 6
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoid of Coccus hesperidumon guava in Giza governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.


### 3.4. Pulvinaria floccifera on Mango in Sharqiya

About  127,000 adult ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period of 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 7). The buildupof the population ofC. scutellaris in the Sharqiya governorate on mango correlated with that of P. floccifera(r=0.798) with simple regression values of b=0.295, R2=0.788, and P<.01. Maximum parasitism reached 22.4% during Oct. 2010 in the treatment plot (after the release), while maximum parasitism reached 6.7% during Oct. 2010 in the control plot (before the release). Parasitism by the primary parasitoid S. caerulea decreased from 2.2 to 1.0% after the release (Figures 7 and 8).Figure 7
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoid of Pulvinaria flocciferaon mango in Sharqiya governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 8
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoid of Pulvinaria flocciferaon mango in Sharqiya governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.


### 3.5. Pulvinaria psidii  on Mango in Ismailia

About  141,000 adults ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period of 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 9). The buildup of the population of C. scutellaris in the Ismailia governorate on mango correlated with that of P. psidii(r=0.934) with simple regression values of b=0.324, R2=0.903, and P<.01.  Maximum parasitism reached 9.7% during Oct. 2010  in the treatment plot (after release), while no parasitism was observed during Oct. 2010  in the control plot (before release). Parasitism by the primary parasitoids Metaphycus flavus (Howard), M. helvolus (Compere), and Diversinervus elegans Silvestri   decreased from 3.5 to 0%, from 5.9 to 1.4%, and from 0.2 to 0%,  respectively, after release (Figures 9 and 10).Figure 9
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Pulvinaria psidiion mango in Ismailia governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 10
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Pulvinaria psidiion mango in Ismailia governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.


### 3.6. Saissetia coffeae on Olive in Marsa Matruh

About  140,000 adult ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 11). The buildup of the population of C. scutellaris in the Marsa Matruh governorate on olive correlated with that of  S. coffeae(r=0.798) with simple regression values of b=0.299, R2=0.787, and P<.01.  Maximum parasitism reached 17.3% during Oct. 2010 in the treatment plot (after release), while maximum parasitism reached 2.5% during Oct. 2010 in the control plot (before release). Parasitism by the primary parasitoidsMetaphycus lounsburyi (Howard)  and  M. flavus decreased from 7.1 to 3.2%  and  from 8.4 to 1.3%, respectively, after the release (Figures 11 and 12).Figure 11
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Saissetia coffeaeon olive in Marsa Matruh governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 12
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Saissetia coffeaeon olive in Marsa Matruh governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.


### 3.7. Saissetia oleae on Olive in Northern Coast

About  134,000 adult ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period of 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 13). The buildup in the population of  C. scutellaris in the Northern Coast region on olive correlated with that of S. oleaepopulation buildup (r=0.855) with simple regression values of b=0.301, R2=0.846, and P<.01. Maximum parasitism reached 25.8% during Oct. 2010 in the treatment plot (after the release), while maximum parasitism reached 6.1% during Oct. 2010 in the control plot (before the release). Parasitism by the primary parasitoids Metaphycus flavus (Howard), M. helvolus (Compere), and the egg predator Scutellista caerulea (Boyer de Fonscolombe), decreased from 10.5 to 2.4%, from 7.1 to 4.5%, and from 13.4 to 8.9%,  respectively, after the release (Figures 13 and 14).Figure 13
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Saissetia oleaeon olive in Northern Coast governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 14
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Saissetia oleaeon olive in Northern Coast governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.Results of the mass rearing showed that large numbers of this parasitoid species can be obtained by mass rearing. Parasitoids collected in areas where they are abundant and those reared in the laboratory can be transferred, distributed, and released in locations where the parasitoid is rare or not known to occur. Monthly collections of scale hosts and parasitoids were made in the release sites to monitor the population of the parasitoid where it was not previously known to exist.The seven sites in Egypt where the parasitoids were released distinctive in their locations as well as their environmental conditions. Prior to its release,Coccophagus scutellaris  was not found in Ismailia but was found in the other locations with parasitism rates ranging from 1.3 to 6.7% in control plot and from 15.9 to 25.8% in the treatment plot. After its release,Coccophagus scutellaris,was found to be established in Ismailia, with maximum parasitism rate of 9.7% during Oct. 2010. The egg parasitoid, Alaptus pallidicorniswas collected only in Giza, located south of Nile Delta, an area   characterized as having high humidity. Also the parasitoid, Diversinervus elegans, was only collected in Ismailia, located on Suez Canal and Temsah Lake, which is characterized as having   low humidity.This work is an important step towards replacing the chemical insecticides currently used for controlling these soft scale species with  environmentally friendly biological control agents. The control of these serious pests on economic crops in Egypt is especially important for products exported to other countries.


## 3.1. Ceroplastes floridensis on Citrus in Gharbiya

About  136,000 adults ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period of 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 1). The buildup of the population of C. scutellaris in the Gharbiya governorate on citrus correlated with that of  C. floridensis (r=0.973) with simple regression values of  b=0.311, R2=0.951, and P<.01. Parasitism reached a maximum of 22.1% during October 2010 in the treatment plot (after release) while a maximum of 1.8% was reached during October 2009 in the control plot (before release). Parasitism by  the other associated primary parasitoids Microterys flavus (Howard) and Metaphycus flavus (Howard)  decreased from 1.4 to 1.1% and from 1.4 to 0.8%,  respectively, after the release of  C. scutellaris (Figures 1 and 2).Table 1
Total numbers of  the adult parasitoidCoccophagus scutellaris released in different  fields of citrus, guava, mango, olive in Beni Seuf, Gharbiya, Giza, Ismailia, Marsa Matruh,  Northern Coast, and Sharqiya    governorates in Egypt during each year from 2009/2010.
MonthNo. of released   parasitoids  by scale insect speciesCeroplastes floridensisCeroplastes rusciCoccus hesperidumPulvinaria flocciferaPulvinaria psidiiSaissetia coffeaeSaissetia oleaeOct.100001100090001100090001200010000Nov.1000011000800010000110001100010000Dec.1200010000110001100011000110009000Jan.11000100001000011000100001000011000Feb.1200010000110001100011000110009000March10000110001100010000120001100010000April900010000100001100010000100009000May11000100001200011000100001000011000June10000110001200010000110001200010000July1000090001100010000110001100012000Aug.10000110001100010000120001100010000Sept.11000120001000011000120001000010000Oct.10000110001200010000110001000013000Total136000137000138000127000141000140000134000Figure 1
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Ceroplastes floridensison citrus in Gharbiya governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 2
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Ceroplastes floridensison citrus in Gharbiya governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.


## 3.2. Ceroplastes rusci on Citrus in Beni Seuf

About  137,000 adult ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period of 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 3). The buildup of the population of C. scutellaris in the Beni Seuf governorate on citrus correlated with that of C. rusci(r=0.813) with simple regression to these revealed values of b=0.311, R2=0.804, and P<.01. Parasitism reached a maximum of 15.9% during Oct. 2010 in the treatment plot (after the release), while parasitism reached a maximum 1.3% during Oct. 2010 in the control plot (before the release). Parasitism by  the primary parasitoidMetaphycus zebratus (Mercet) and the egg predator, Sutellista caerulea (Boyer de Fonscolombe), decreased from 3.8 to 1.1%  and  from 10.4 to 2.4%, respectively, after the release of C. scutellaris (Figures 3 and 4).Figure 3
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Ceroplastes ruscion citrus in Beni Seuf governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 4
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Ceroplastes ruscion citrus in Beni Seuf governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.


## 3.3. Coccus hesperidum on Guava in Giza

About  138,000 adult ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period of 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 5). The buildup of the population C. scutellaris in the Giza governorate on guava correlated with that of C. hesperidumpopulation buildup (r=0.870) with simple regression values of b=0.301, R2=0.842, and P<.01. Maximum parasitism reached 21.5% during Oct. 2010 in the treatment plot (after release), while maximum parasitism reached 1.3% during November 2009 in the control plot (before release). Parasitism by the egg parasitoid, Alaptus pallidicornis Förster, decreased from 1.4 to 1.1% after the release (Figures 5 and 6).Figure 5
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoid of Coccus hesperidumon guava in Giza governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 6
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoid of Coccus hesperidumon guava in Giza governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.


## 3.4. Pulvinaria floccifera on Mango in Sharqiya

About  127,000 adult ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period of 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 7). The buildupof the population ofC. scutellaris in the Sharqiya governorate on mango correlated with that of P. floccifera(r=0.798) with simple regression values of b=0.295, R2=0.788, and P<.01. Maximum parasitism reached 22.4% during Oct. 2010 in the treatment plot (after the release), while maximum parasitism reached 6.7% during Oct. 2010 in the control plot (before the release). Parasitism by the primary parasitoid S. caerulea decreased from 2.2 to 1.0% after the release (Figures 7 and 8).Figure 7
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoid of Pulvinaria flocciferaon mango in Sharqiya governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 8
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoid of Pulvinaria flocciferaon mango in Sharqiya governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.


## 3.5. Pulvinaria psidii  on Mango in Ismailia

About  141,000 adults ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period of 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 9). The buildup of the population of C. scutellaris in the Ismailia governorate on mango correlated with that of P. psidii(r=0.934) with simple regression values of b=0.324, R2=0.903, and P<.01.  Maximum parasitism reached 9.7% during Oct. 2010  in the treatment plot (after release), while no parasitism was observed during Oct. 2010  in the control plot (before release). Parasitism by the primary parasitoids Metaphycus flavus (Howard), M. helvolus (Compere), and Diversinervus elegans Silvestri   decreased from 3.5 to 0%, from 5.9 to 1.4%, and from 0.2 to 0%,  respectively, after release (Figures 9 and 10).Figure 9
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Pulvinaria psidiion mango in Ismailia governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 10
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Pulvinaria psidiion mango in Ismailia governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.


## 3.6. Saissetia coffeae on Olive in Marsa Matruh

About  140,000 adult ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 11). The buildup of the population of C. scutellaris in the Marsa Matruh governorate on olive correlated with that of  S. coffeae(r=0.798) with simple regression values of b=0.299, R2=0.787, and P<.01.  Maximum parasitism reached 17.3% during Oct. 2010 in the treatment plot (after release), while maximum parasitism reached 2.5% during Oct. 2010 in the control plot (before release). Parasitism by the primary parasitoidsMetaphycus lounsburyi (Howard)  and  M. flavus decreased from 7.1 to 3.2%  and  from 8.4 to 1.3%, respectively, after the release (Figures 11 and 12).Figure 11
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Saissetia coffeaeon olive in Marsa Matruh governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 12
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Saissetia coffeaeon olive in Marsa Matruh governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.


## 3.7. Saissetia oleae on Olive in Northern Coast

About  134,000 adult ofC. scutellaris individuals were released during the period of 2009-2010 (Table 1). Parasitism increased after the release (Figure 13). The buildup in the population of  C. scutellaris in the Northern Coast region on olive correlated with that of S. oleaepopulation buildup (r=0.855) with simple regression values of b=0.301, R2=0.846, and P<.01. Maximum parasitism reached 25.8% during Oct. 2010 in the treatment plot (after the release), while maximum parasitism reached 6.1% during Oct. 2010 in the control plot (before the release). Parasitism by the primary parasitoids Metaphycus flavus (Howard), M. helvolus (Compere), and the egg predator Scutellista caerulea (Boyer de Fonscolombe), decreased from 10.5 to 2.4%, from 7.1 to 4.5%, and from 13.4 to 8.9%,  respectively, after the release (Figures 13 and 14).Figure 13
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Saissetia oleaeon olive in Northern Coast governorate after releasing during 2009-2010.Figure 14
Percent parasitism ofCoccophagus scutellarisand other associated parasitoids of Saissetia oleaeon olive in Northern Coast governorate before releasing during 2009-2010.Results of the mass rearing showed that large numbers of this parasitoid species can be obtained by mass rearing. Parasitoids collected in areas where they are abundant and those reared in the laboratory can be transferred, distributed, and released in locations where the parasitoid is rare or not known to occur. Monthly collections of scale hosts and parasitoids were made in the release sites to monitor the population of the parasitoid where it was not previously known to exist.The seven sites in Egypt where the parasitoids were released distinctive in their locations as well as their environmental conditions. Prior to its release,Coccophagus scutellaris  was not found in Ismailia but was found in the other locations with parasitism rates ranging from 1.3 to 6.7% in control plot and from 15.9 to 25.8% in the treatment plot. After its release,Coccophagus scutellaris,was found to be established in Ismailia, with maximum parasitism rate of 9.7% during Oct. 2010. The egg parasitoid, Alaptus pallidicorniswas collected only in Giza, located south of Nile Delta, an area   characterized as having high humidity. Also the parasitoid, Diversinervus elegans, was only collected in Ismailia, located on Suez Canal and Temsah Lake, which is characterized as having   low humidity.This work is an important step towards replacing the chemical insecticides currently used for controlling these soft scale species with  environmentally friendly biological control agents. The control of these serious pests on economic crops in Egypt is especially important for products exported to other countries.


## 4. Conclusion

The methodology developed in amassing large numbers of the parasitoid,C. scutellaris, in the laboratory, reared or collected in the field and distributed them in areas where they are not known to occur is an effective way of establishing the parasitoid in areas where the parasitoid is needed to control soft scale species. The percentage of parasitism was satisfactory, and the population of soft scales decreased to a satisfactory level at the sites studied.



---

*Source: 431874-2011-06-20.xml*