# Effect of Potential, Temperature, and Fluoride Ions on the Repassivation Kinetics of Titanium in Phosphate Buffered Saline Solution with the Photon Rupture Method

Authors: Masatoshi Sakairi; Hiroomi Miyata; Tatsuya Kikuchi; Hideaki Takahashi
Journal: Laser Chemistry
 (2009)

---

## Abstract

The effect of the applied potentials, temperature, andF− ions on the localized repassivation kinetics of titanium was investigated by the photon rupture method, PRM, and electrochemical techniques in phosphate buffered saline solution. The logI versus logt plots after laser beam irradiation showed a
rapid increase, then a decrease with a slope of about −1.5, which is steeper than that expected from
high field oxide film formation theory, suggesting that the repassivation of titanium is a combination of electrochemical and chemical reactions. The repassivation current increases with increases in the applied potential and addition of F− ions, while solution temperature does not influence the repassivation kinetics. The effect of F− ions on the repassivation kinetics can be explained by localized pH changes caused by very rapid dissolution of titanium when titanium was exposed to PBS solution.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Air formed oxide films or native oxide films on titanium and its alloys play a very important role in biocompatibility and corrosion resistance, however, the oxide films may be removed or destroyed mechanically or chemically during service. This oxide film breakdown may be a cause of further, continuous dissolution of the underlying metals, and as metals are dissolved in vitro, the increase in metal ion concentration may induce cell death near the dissolving metals. Therefore, many papers have investigated corrosion of metals, mainly titanium alloys and stainless steels both in vitro and in vivo [1–10]. Karthega et al. [6] reported on the electrochemical behavior of β-titanium alloys in Hank's solutions. Cheng et al. [7] studied crevice corrosion resistance of NiTi in Hanks’ solutions. Reclaru and Meyer [11] reported corrosion in the presence of a titanium implants and dental alloys. Khan et al. [12] reported  corrosion and wear of titanium alloys in biological environments. Suba et al. [13] examined the morphological changes in vitro and in vivo of the Ti/TiO2 layer and the surface changes induced by mechanical scratching of samples. Handzlik and Fitzner [14] reported electronic properties of anodic oxide films formed on titanium in phosphate buffered saline solution and artificial saliva.When titanium and its alloys are used in dental applications, the oxide films on them are removed by brushing and when in contact with foods, and then usually repassivate. Understanding the repassivation kinetics is very important for understanding corrosion and protection of metals, both in dental and other applications. Therefore, there are many papers related to repassivation behavior using mechanical oxide film stripping techniques [15–18]. Burstein and liu [15, 16] used a guillotine electrode technique to investigate repassivation kinetics. Tsuru and Sakairi [18] have reported breakdown and repassivation of passive oxide film of iron whiskers by a mechanical deformation method. Conventional mechanical oxide film stripping techniques, however, suffer from disadvantages, such as slow rates of stripping, contamination of exposed surfaces from the stripping tools, and stresses and strains on the substrate during film stripping. In the last 15 years, there are reports of film stripping by focused pulsed Nd-YAG-laser beam irradiation (Photon Rupture Method, PRM, or laser impact), which solves many of the problems caused by mechanical oxide film stripping [19–25]. The irradiation with a pulsed laser beam is able to strip oxide film at extremely high rates without contamination from the film removing tools [19]. Itagaki et al. [20] reported the amount of dissolution of iron during repassivation from a freshly generated surface by using pulsed laser beam irradiation and a channel flow double electrode. Some of the authors here [21–25] have reported on the repassivation kinetics and the initial stage of localized corrosion behavior of coated steels by PRM combined with electrochemical techniques.From a practical point of view, titanium alloys are usually used as a biomaterial, so, it is important to examine the repassivation behavior of titanium alloys both in vivo and in vitro. However, alloying elements and in vivo experiments sometimes make it difficult to understand the repassivation kinetics, therefore, commercially available pure titanium was used as specimens and in vitro experimental conditions were investigated in the present study. There are many kinds of artificial body fluids, and the phosphate buffered saline solution in this study was selected as an artificial body fluid, because of its buffer reaction, pH, and stability.The purpose of this study is to apply the PRM to investigate the effects of the applied potentials and temperature on the repassivation kinetics of titanium in phosphate buffered saline solutions.  Some commercially available tooth pastes contain NaF or other F containing compounds, meaning thatF- ion and/or HF may be formed during brushing. If titanium containing dental implants are used, and bare metal surfaces are exposed to F- or HF containing solutions, it is well known that titanium easily dissolves in the presence of F- ions especially at low pH [26]. To investigate only the effect of F- ions on repassivation kinetics of titanium, phosphate buffered saline solution with dissolved NaF was used in the present study. To examine the effect of F- ions on the repassivation kinetics of commercial pure titanium by PRM and to elucidate the role of F- ions on the repassivaion kinetics is also a purpose of this study.


## 2. Experimental

Specimens. Titanium sheet (thickness 0.3 mm, Niraco Co.) of 99.9 mass% Ti was cut into 10×20mm2 coupons, and the chemical composition of the sheet is as shown in Table 1. The specimens were cleaned for 300 second in ethanol and in doubly distilled water, ultrasonically; then electropolished at a constant cell voltage of 10 V in 3 kmol m-3H2SO4 ethanol solution at 253 K for 60 second.Table 1
Chemical composition of titanium (mass%).
FeONCHTi0.020.050.010.010.003bal.Counter and reference electrodes. Pt plate was used as the counter electrode and an Ag/AgCl (KCl sat.) electrode was used as the reference electrode in the anodizing and electrochemical measurements.Protective film formation. In this study, barrier type anodic oxide films were used as the protective film to avoid electrochemical reactions at areas that were not laser beam irradiated. The anodizing was carried out in 0.5 kmol m-3H3BO4/0.05 kmol m-3Na2B4O7 solution at 293 K at a constant anodic current density of 10 A m-2 up to a potential of 22 V, then kept at this anodic potential for 600 second. Figure 1 shows the changes in current and potential during the barrier type oxide film formation. From the final anodizing potential, the color of the specimens, and a previous report [27], the formed anodic oxide film thickness was estimated to be about 70 nm.Figure 1
Changes in current and potential during anodizing in 0.5 kmolm-3H3BO4/0.05 kmol m-3Na2B4O7 solution.Solution. A Phosphate Buffered Saline solution, PBS, 8.1 mol m-3Na2HPO4+1.5 mol m-3KH2PO4+137 mol m-3NaCl+2.7 mol m-3KCl, was used as the electrolyte. To investigate the influence of F- ions, 24 mol m-3NaF was added to the PBS.Polarization behavior. To determine the applied potential for measuring the repassivation kinetics, the polarization behavior of electropolished specimens were measured by the linear potential sweep method in PBS and PBS with NaF at 296 K, with a sweep rate = 0.33 mV/s.Repassivation kinetics. The anodized specimens were immersed in the solutions, and a potential (−0.2 V to 1.5 V) was applied while controlling the temperature, thereafter the specimens were irradiated by one focused pulse of the pulsed laser beam. Figure 2 shows a schematic outline of the PRM test equipment. The current transient after the irradiation was measured by a digital oscilloscope (Yokogawa co., DL708E) connected to a personal computer. The Nd-YAG laser (Sepctra Physics GCR-130) apparatus used in this study was at a wavelength of 532 nm, wave duration 8 nanosecond, frequency 10 s-1, and beam power 30 mW.Figure 2
Schematic outline of the PRM test equipment.Surface observations. The specimen surfaces were examined by a Confocal Scanning Laser Microscope (CSLM, Laser Tech. Co. 1SA-21).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Polarization Behavior

Figure3 shows the anodic potentiodynamic polarization curves of electropolished specimens in PBS and PBS with NaF at 296 K. The rest potential in both solutions are very similar, at −0.35 V, suggesting that the addition of F- ions does not influence the rest potential of the electropolished specimen. With increasing applied potential, the anodic current increases initially and then reaches a steady value in both solutions and the steady current increased with the sweep rate. These results suggest that barrier type anodic oxide film formed on the specimen [27], and further, the constant current increase with the addition of F- ions suggests that F- ions accelerate the dissolution of titanium or formed oxide film. From the polarization curves, the potentials of −0.2, 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 V were selected for the repassivation experiments.Figure 3
Anodic polarization curves of titanium in PBS and PBS with NaF at 296 K. Sweep rate: 0.33 mVs-1


### 3.2. Effect of Temperature and Applied Potential on Repassivation Kinetics

Figure4 shows the anodic current transient after laser beam irradiation in PBS at 313 and 296 K at 1.5 V. By the laser beam irradiation, the current increases instantaneously, goes through a maximum, Ip, at about 0.3 millisecond, then decreases with time to reach a value similar to that before the laser beam irradiation at about 100 milliseconds at both temperatures. The rapid current increase indicates that anodic oxide film was removed by the laser beam irradiation and the decrease in the current means repassivation may have taken place on the irradiated surface. The anodic current is almost the same at both temperatures, suggesting that the solution temperature does not greatly influence the current transients.Figure 4
Anodic current transient after laser beam irradiation of titanium in PBS at 313 and 296 K at 1.5 V.Current fluctuations are observed in the anodic current transients afterIp in Figure 4, but the mechanism of the current fluctuations is not fully understood. Assuming that the anodic oxide film removal mechanism is laser ablation, the specimen/solution interface is destroyed and a kind of elastic wave is also generated inside the specimen. Because the average laser beam energy was very low and these experiments were carried out in solutions, the surface temperature of the specimens would be the same as the bulk solution temperature at the time of the current measurements, while at the same time the specimen/solution interface may not be stabilized at the initial stage of the current measurements. Such instabilities at the interface could be causes of the current fluctuations.The color of the laser beam irradiated area was the same as the electropolished titanium surface, while the color of other areas was the same as after anodizing. Figure5 shows CSLM surface contrast images of specimens (a) before and (b) after the laser experiment in PBS at a constant potential of 1.5 V at 313 K. The anodic film was completely removed at the laser beam irradiated area, the area where the film was removed shows an almost circular outline and the surface appears melted and quickly solidified. The diameter of the irradiated area is about 150 μm, and this size was almost the same in all the experiments. The current transient in Figure 4 is related to repassivation of this irradiated area. No corrosion products are observed anywhere on the specimen surface, including not on the laser beam irradiated area. The current transients in Figure 4 and the surface images together suggest that repassivation occurs on the irradiated surface.CSLM surface contrast image of titanium specimen (a) before and (b) after laser irradiation in PBS at a constant potential of 1.5 V at 313 K.
(a)(b)In this experiment, the applied potential when measuring the repassivation kinetics by PRM was lower than 2 V, and this means that the oxide film which formed on the irradiated surface is about 10 nm or thinner [28]. The high electric field oxide film formation theory is generally applied for the oxidation kinetics. In this theory, the electric field inside of the thin oxide film is so strong that the velocity of drift of ions is no longer proportional to the electric field, therefore, the rate-determining step of the oxide film growth reaction may be the speed of titanium atom escape from the titanium substrate to the oxide film [22, 29]. In this situation, the slope of logI versus logt curves during oxide film formation must be about −1, however, the slopes of the logI versus logt curves in the experiments are about −1.5 suggesting that the reaction mechanism of repassivation of titanium could be a combination of electrochemical and chemical reactions. During the growth of the oxide film, the strength of the electric field inside the formed oxide film is reduced, because of the constant potential mode of the laser experiments. The electric field changes also produce electrostriction of the anodic oxide film. Hasebe and Alwitt reported electrostrictive behavior of anodic aluminum oxide films [30, 31].  If the titanium anodic oxide film is brittle, this electrostriction of the anodic film may produce nano- or microcracks inside the film. Then, thorough these cracks, bare titanium surface is exposed to solution and a possible chemical reaction is as follows [32]:(1)Ti+4H2O→TiO2+4H+.
This chemical reaction accelerates the oxide film growth kinetics and shows a steep slope in the logI versus logt curves. However, details of the chemical reaction and mechanism of oxide film growth are still unclear at present, and further experiments must be done to clarify the phenomena.Figure6 shows changes in the anodic current after the laser beam was irradiated in PBS at  −0.2 V, 0.5 V, and 1.5 V at 313 K. The tendency of the current transient is very similar to that in Figure 4 at every applied potential. The current increases with increasing applied potentials suggesting that the main reaction of the repassivation may be the electrochemical reaction. Figure 7 shows Ip as a function of the applied potential in PBS at 296 and 313 K. The Ip increases with increasing applied potential, however, solution temperature has little or no influence on Ip.Figure 6
Changes in the anodic current after the laser beam was irradiated on titanium in PBS at‒0.2 V, 0.5 V and 1.5 V, at 313 K.Figure 7
Ip as a function of applied potential in PBS at 296 and 313 K.


### 3.3. Effect ofF- ions on Repassivation kinetics

The anodic current transient after laser beam irradiation in PBS and PBS withF- ions at 0 V at 296 K[k] is shown in Figure 8, with a schematic model of slope changes of the current transients by F- ions. The tendency of the current transient is very similar to the previous results (Figures 4 and 6) in both solutions. These results suggest that oxide films are formed on the laser beam irradiated surface also when F- ions are contained in the solution. The F- ions do not greatly influence the total amount of charge, however, the slope of the logI versus logt plots around 1 millisecond appears to include a plateau like Sakairi et al. [33] has reported suggesting that the slope of the current transient after the laser beam irradiation becomes flatter in corrosive environments. Therefore, the result here suggests that the presence of F- ions accelerate dissolution of titanium or its oxide film at the very initial stage (about 1 millisecond after the laser beam irradiation) of repassivation, and the details of the mechanism of F- ions will be explained in the later part of this section.Anodic current transient after laser irradiation of titanium in PBS and PBS withF- ions at 0 V at 296 K and schematic model of slope changes of the current transients by F- ions.
(a)(b)Figure9 shows changes in the anodic current after laser beam irradiation at 0 and 1 V in PBS with F- ions at 296 K. The changes in the current transients are very similar to the previous figures, however, the slope between 0.3 millisecond and 2 milliseconds is flatter than that after 2 milliseconds. The current increases with increasing applied potential, however, specimens are also repassivated under these experimental conditions. Figure 10 shows the Ip obtained from Figure 9 as a function of the applied potential, and the Ip increases with increasing applied potential.Figure 9
Changes in anodic current after laser beam irradiation of titanium at 0 and 1 V in PBS withF- ions at 296 K.Figure 10
Ip from Figure 9 as a function of the applied potential.Figure11 is a schematic representation of the titanium/solution interface after laser beam irradiation in PBS with F- ions: (a) before the anodic current peak, the anodic oxide film is removed by laser irradiation and titanium dissolution is initiated, (b) next, the pH changes at the laser beam irradiated area at the very initial stage. Overall, after the anodic oxide film removal, titanium is exposed to solution, and titanium starts to dissolve and react with water. This reaction causes the decrease in pH at the interface and the pH change and the presence of F- ions at the interface would accelerate the dissolution of titanium or formed titanium oxide film. After several microseconds, the decrease in this local pH may be compensated to neutral values by the buffering reaction of the PBS. This may be postulated as an explanation why the slope of the initial stage (between 0.3 millisecond and 2 milliseconds in Figures 8 and 9) displays a plateau in F- ion containing solutions.Schematic representation of the changes at the titanium/solution interface after laser beam irradiation.
(a)
Anodic oxide film removed locally by laser beam irradiation.(b)
Then pH changes at the very initial stage after irradiation.


## 3.1. Polarization Behavior

Figure3 shows the anodic potentiodynamic polarization curves of electropolished specimens in PBS and PBS with NaF at 296 K. The rest potential in both solutions are very similar, at −0.35 V, suggesting that the addition of F- ions does not influence the rest potential of the electropolished specimen. With increasing applied potential, the anodic current increases initially and then reaches a steady value in both solutions and the steady current increased with the sweep rate. These results suggest that barrier type anodic oxide film formed on the specimen [27], and further, the constant current increase with the addition of F- ions suggests that F- ions accelerate the dissolution of titanium or formed oxide film. From the polarization curves, the potentials of −0.2, 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 V were selected for the repassivation experiments.Figure 3
Anodic polarization curves of titanium in PBS and PBS with NaF at 296 K. Sweep rate: 0.33 mVs-1


## 3.2. Effect of Temperature and Applied Potential on Repassivation Kinetics

Figure4 shows the anodic current transient after laser beam irradiation in PBS at 313 and 296 K at 1.5 V. By the laser beam irradiation, the current increases instantaneously, goes through a maximum, Ip, at about 0.3 millisecond, then decreases with time to reach a value similar to that before the laser beam irradiation at about 100 milliseconds at both temperatures. The rapid current increase indicates that anodic oxide film was removed by the laser beam irradiation and the decrease in the current means repassivation may have taken place on the irradiated surface. The anodic current is almost the same at both temperatures, suggesting that the solution temperature does not greatly influence the current transients.Figure 4
Anodic current transient after laser beam irradiation of titanium in PBS at 313 and 296 K at 1.5 V.Current fluctuations are observed in the anodic current transients afterIp in Figure 4, but the mechanism of the current fluctuations is not fully understood. Assuming that the anodic oxide film removal mechanism is laser ablation, the specimen/solution interface is destroyed and a kind of elastic wave is also generated inside the specimen. Because the average laser beam energy was very low and these experiments were carried out in solutions, the surface temperature of the specimens would be the same as the bulk solution temperature at the time of the current measurements, while at the same time the specimen/solution interface may not be stabilized at the initial stage of the current measurements. Such instabilities at the interface could be causes of the current fluctuations.The color of the laser beam irradiated area was the same as the electropolished titanium surface, while the color of other areas was the same as after anodizing. Figure5 shows CSLM surface contrast images of specimens (a) before and (b) after the laser experiment in PBS at a constant potential of 1.5 V at 313 K. The anodic film was completely removed at the laser beam irradiated area, the area where the film was removed shows an almost circular outline and the surface appears melted and quickly solidified. The diameter of the irradiated area is about 150 μm, and this size was almost the same in all the experiments. The current transient in Figure 4 is related to repassivation of this irradiated area. No corrosion products are observed anywhere on the specimen surface, including not on the laser beam irradiated area. The current transients in Figure 4 and the surface images together suggest that repassivation occurs on the irradiated surface.CSLM surface contrast image of titanium specimen (a) before and (b) after laser irradiation in PBS at a constant potential of 1.5 V at 313 K.
(a)(b)In this experiment, the applied potential when measuring the repassivation kinetics by PRM was lower than 2 V, and this means that the oxide film which formed on the irradiated surface is about 10 nm or thinner [28]. The high electric field oxide film formation theory is generally applied for the oxidation kinetics. In this theory, the electric field inside of the thin oxide film is so strong that the velocity of drift of ions is no longer proportional to the electric field, therefore, the rate-determining step of the oxide film growth reaction may be the speed of titanium atom escape from the titanium substrate to the oxide film [22, 29]. In this situation, the slope of logI versus logt curves during oxide film formation must be about −1, however, the slopes of the logI versus logt curves in the experiments are about −1.5 suggesting that the reaction mechanism of repassivation of titanium could be a combination of electrochemical and chemical reactions. During the growth of the oxide film, the strength of the electric field inside the formed oxide film is reduced, because of the constant potential mode of the laser experiments. The electric field changes also produce electrostriction of the anodic oxide film. Hasebe and Alwitt reported electrostrictive behavior of anodic aluminum oxide films [30, 31].  If the titanium anodic oxide film is brittle, this electrostriction of the anodic film may produce nano- or microcracks inside the film. Then, thorough these cracks, bare titanium surface is exposed to solution and a possible chemical reaction is as follows [32]:(1)Ti+4H2O→TiO2+4H+.
This chemical reaction accelerates the oxide film growth kinetics and shows a steep slope in the logI versus logt curves. However, details of the chemical reaction and mechanism of oxide film growth are still unclear at present, and further experiments must be done to clarify the phenomena.Figure6 shows changes in the anodic current after the laser beam was irradiated in PBS at  −0.2 V, 0.5 V, and 1.5 V at 313 K. The tendency of the current transient is very similar to that in Figure 4 at every applied potential. The current increases with increasing applied potentials suggesting that the main reaction of the repassivation may be the electrochemical reaction. Figure 7 shows Ip as a function of the applied potential in PBS at 296 and 313 K. The Ip increases with increasing applied potential, however, solution temperature has little or no influence on Ip.Figure 6
Changes in the anodic current after the laser beam was irradiated on titanium in PBS at‒0.2 V, 0.5 V and 1.5 V, at 313 K.Figure 7
Ip as a function of applied potential in PBS at 296 and 313 K.


## 3.3. Effect ofF- ions on Repassivation kinetics

The anodic current transient after laser beam irradiation in PBS and PBS withF- ions at 0 V at 296 K[k] is shown in Figure 8, with a schematic model of slope changes of the current transients by F- ions. The tendency of the current transient is very similar to the previous results (Figures 4 and 6) in both solutions. These results suggest that oxide films are formed on the laser beam irradiated surface also when F- ions are contained in the solution. The F- ions do not greatly influence the total amount of charge, however, the slope of the logI versus logt plots around 1 millisecond appears to include a plateau like Sakairi et al. [33] has reported suggesting that the slope of the current transient after the laser beam irradiation becomes flatter in corrosive environments. Therefore, the result here suggests that the presence of F- ions accelerate dissolution of titanium or its oxide film at the very initial stage (about 1 millisecond after the laser beam irradiation) of repassivation, and the details of the mechanism of F- ions will be explained in the later part of this section.Anodic current transient after laser irradiation of titanium in PBS and PBS withF- ions at 0 V at 296 K and schematic model of slope changes of the current transients by F- ions.
(a)(b)Figure9 shows changes in the anodic current after laser beam irradiation at 0 and 1 V in PBS with F- ions at 296 K. The changes in the current transients are very similar to the previous figures, however, the slope between 0.3 millisecond and 2 milliseconds is flatter than that after 2 milliseconds. The current increases with increasing applied potential, however, specimens are also repassivated under these experimental conditions. Figure 10 shows the Ip obtained from Figure 9 as a function of the applied potential, and the Ip increases with increasing applied potential.Figure 9
Changes in anodic current after laser beam irradiation of titanium at 0 and 1 V in PBS withF- ions at 296 K.Figure 10
Ip from Figure 9 as a function of the applied potential.Figure11 is a schematic representation of the titanium/solution interface after laser beam irradiation in PBS with F- ions: (a) before the anodic current peak, the anodic oxide film is removed by laser irradiation and titanium dissolution is initiated, (b) next, the pH changes at the laser beam irradiated area at the very initial stage. Overall, after the anodic oxide film removal, titanium is exposed to solution, and titanium starts to dissolve and react with water. This reaction causes the decrease in pH at the interface and the pH change and the presence of F- ions at the interface would accelerate the dissolution of titanium or formed titanium oxide film. After several microseconds, the decrease in this local pH may be compensated to neutral values by the buffering reaction of the PBS. This may be postulated as an explanation why the slope of the initial stage (between 0.3 millisecond and 2 milliseconds in Figures 8 and 9) displays a plateau in F- ion containing solutions.Schematic representation of the changes at the titanium/solution interface after laser beam irradiation.
(a)
Anodic oxide film removed locally by laser beam irradiation.(b)
Then pH changes at the very initial stage after irradiation.


## 4. Conclusions

The photon rupture method was applied to investigate the effects of the applied potentials, temperature, andF- ions on the repassivation kinetics for commercial pure titanium in PBS, and the following conclusions may be drawn.(1)
All specimens are repassivated after the laser beam irradiation, and the measured slope of the anodic current transient is steeper than what would be expected from high electric field oxide film formation theory.(2)
Current fluctuations are observed at the initial stage of the anodic current transient. These current fluctuations may be caused by instabilities at the specimen/solution interface formed by laser ablation.(3)
The solution temperature does not greatly influence the repassivation kinetics in PBS, while the anodic current peak increases with increasing applied potential and addition ofF- ions.



---

*Source: 436065-2009-07-14.xml*