# PRPF3-Associated Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa and CYP4V2-Associated Bietti’s Crystalline Corneoretinal Dystrophy Coexist in a Multigenerational Chinese Family

Authors: Xiaohong Meng; Qiyou Li; Hong Guo; Haiwei Xu; Shiying Li; Zhengqin Yin
Journal: Journal of Ophthalmology
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Purpose. To characterize the clinical and molecular genetic characteristics of a large, multigenerational Chinese family showing different phenotypes. Methods. A pedigree consisted of 56 individuals in 5 generations was recruited. Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations were performed in 16 family members affected. Mutation screening of CYP4V2 was performed by Sanger sequencing. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed to capture and sequence all exons of 47 known retinal dystrophy-associated genes in two affected family members who had no mutations in CYP4V2. The detected variants in NGS were validated by Sanger sequencing in the family members. Results. Two compound heterozygous CYP4V2 mutations (c.802-8_810del17insGC and c.992A>C) were detected in the proband who presented typical clinical features of BCD. One missense mutation (c.1482C>T, p.T494M) in the PRPF3 gene was detected in 9 out of 22 affected family members who manifested classical clinical features of RP. Conclusions. Our results showed that two compound heterozygous CYP4V2 mutations caused BCD, and one missense mutation in PRPF3 was responsible for adRP in this large family. This study suggests that accurate phenotypic diagnosis, molecular diagnosis, and genetic counseling are necessary for patients with hereditary retinal degeneration in some large mutigenerational family.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) (MIM 268000) is the most common form of hereditary retinal degeneration (HRD), with a worldwide prevalence of 1 in 4000 [1]. The disease can be inherited in an autosomal recessive (AR), autosomal dominant (AD), or X-linked manner [2]. Autosomal dominant RP (adRP) is the most common form of RP and typically begins with night blindness in the early teens, followed by progressive loss in the peripheral visual field, subsequent loss of vision, and eventually legal blindness. To date, mutations in 22 genes have been associated with adRP (RetNet: http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/retnet/sum-dis.htm, last updated November 16, 2016), of which five genes have been reported in Chinese adRP patients [3–7].Bietti’s crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy (BCD) (MIM 210370) is an autosomal recessive retinal dystrophy that is characterized by numerous tiny glistening yellow-white crystals that are scattered at the posterior pole of the retina, progressive atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and choroidal sclerosis. Patients with BCD are usually present in the 2nd or 3rd decade of life and progress to legal blindness by the 5th or 6th decade [8]. Mutations in the CYP4V2 gene (MIM 608614) are associated with BCD [9]. BCD is relatively common in the East Asian populations, especially in Chinese and Japanese populations [9–18].BCD and RP are considered as two different types of retinal dystrophies with distinct clinical courses and features during its early stage. However, the fundus features at the later stage of BCD are occasionally similar to a severe form of RP. The interaction or coexistence of the two clinical phenotypes thus requires further elucidation. In the present study, we distinguish the inheritance patterns, clinical phenotype, and molecular genetic characteristics of the patients in a large, multigeneration Chinese family with RP and BCD.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. Pedigree

A pedigree consisted of 56 individuals in 5 generations was recruited. The Ethics Review Board of the Southwest Hospital (Chongqing, China) approved the research protocol (number 2012-11), which adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.The proband (Figure1, VI:1) was initially presented to our medical institution for genetic counseling based on the observation that most of the family members developed night blindness and visual loss and even complete blindness, resulting in an inability to work. This five-generation family from Southwest of China was assessed in terms of RP and BCD. Thirty-nine participants were ascertained at the Southwest Eye Hospital, Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China (Figure 1). No consanguineous marriage in the family was declared.Figure 1
Pedigree plot. The proband is indicated by an arrow. One affected patient with red solid box showed clinical findings compatible to the diagnosis of Bietti’s crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy (VI:1), and the other affected members with black solid box presented clinical features of retinitis pigmentosa. Males and females are represented by squares and circles, respectively. Filled symbols: affected members; open symbols: unaffected members.The proband presented clinical features that were compatible with a diagnosis of BCD (VI:1), and the family members were subsequently evaluated. Twenty-two living individuals in the family had the clinical features of RP and presented similar symptoms of night blindness and progressive reduction in their field of vision. The RP phenotype followed an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance in this pedigree (Figure1).Thirteen affected individuals (III:9, IV:1, IV:3, IV:5, IV:6, IV:10, IV:12, IV:14, IV:20, V:3, V:9, V:12, and VI:1) and twenty-six unaffected family members (Table1) underwent examination, including best-corrected visual acuity testing with the Snellen vision chart, fundoscopy, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT, Spectralis OCT, Version 6.0; Heidelberg Engineering, Germany), full-field electroretinogram (FERG), and multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). For the ages 6 months, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years old, the visual acuity was assessed using Teller acuity cards and then converted into Snellen vision chart.Table 1
Demographic and clinical features and genotypes ofPRPF3 and CYP4V2 mutations in a family with adRP and arBCD.
Number
Gender
Age
First symptom
Phenotype
BCVA
Eye complications
Systemic diseases
PRPF3 mutation
CYP4V2 mutations
OD
OS
c.1481C>G
c.802-8_810del17insGC
c.992A>C
III:8
Female
76
None
Normal
20/250
20/250
Cataract
ND
ND
ND
III:9
Male
80
Night blindness
RP
LP
LP
Cataract
MT
Wild
Wild
III:10
Female
80
None
Normal
20/50
20/50
Cataract
ND
ND
ND
IV:1
Female
82
Night blindness
RP
LP
LP
Cataract
MT
Wild
Wild
IV:3
Male
57
Night blindness
RP
LP
LP
Cataract
ND
Wild
Wild
IV:5
Male
57
Night blindness
RP
LP
LP
Cataract
ND
ND
ND
IV:6
Male
57
Night blindness
RP
LP
LP
Cataract
MT
Wild
Wild
IV:7
Female
54
None
Normal
20/30
20/30
None
Wild
Wild
Wild
IV:10
Male
39
Night blindness
RP
20/200
20/200
None
MT
Wild
Wild
IV:12
Male
35
Night blindness
RP
20/400
LP
None
ND
Wild
Wild
IV:14
Male
55
Night blindness
RP
20/100
20/200
Cataract
MT
Wild
Wild
IV:15
Female
50
None
Normal
20/35
20/35
None
ND
ND
ND
IV:16
Female
51
None
Normal
20/35
20/20
None
ND
ND
ND
IV:18
Male
49
None
Normal
20/20
20/20
None
ND
ND
ND
IV:20
Male
45
Night blindness
RP
20/100
20/200
None
MT
Wild
Wild
V:1
Female
57
None
Normal
20/20
20/25
None
Breast cancer
ND
MT
Wild
V:2
Male
60
None
Normal
20/30
20/30
Cataract
Fatty liver disease
ND
Wild
MT
V:3
Female
55
Night blindness
RP
20/10
20/200
None
Breast cancer
MT
Wild
Wild
V:7
Male
45
None
Normal
20/30
20/30
Myopia
Wild
Wild
Wild
V:8
Female
46
None
Normal
20/18
20/18
None
Wild
Wild
Wild
V:9
Male
43
Night blindness
RP
20/200
LP
Myopia
MT
Wild
Wild
V:11
Male
24
None
Normal
20/18
20/18
None
Wild
Wild
Wild
V:12
Male
22
Night blindness
RP
20/100
20/100
Myopia
MT
Wild
Wild
V:13
Male
13
None
Normal
20/30
20/20
None
ND
Wild
Wild
V:15
Female
8
None
Normal
20/20
20/20
None
ND
Wild
Wild
V:17
Male
37
None
Normal
20/25
20/25
None
ND
Wild
Wild
V:18
Female
35
None
Normal
20/18
20/18
High myopia
ND
ND
ND
V:19
Female
35
None
Normal
20/25
20/20
Myopia
ND
ND
ND
V:20
Male
33
None
Normal
20/18
20/18
None
Wild
Wild
Wild
V:31
Male
15
None
Normal
20/18
20/18
Myopia
ND
ND
ND
VI:1
Male
33
Decreased vision
BCD
20/25
20/30
Myopia, uveitis
Wild
MT
MT
VI:2
Female
29
None
Normal
20/40
20/50
High myopia
ND
ND
ND
VI:10
Female
22
None
Normal
20/18
20/18
Myopia
ND
Wild
Wild
VI:12
Male
15
None
Normal
20/20
20/20
None
ND
Wild
Wild
VI:14
Male
13
None
Normal
20/20
20/20
None
ND
Wild
Wild
VI:15
Male
10
None
Normal
20/20
20/20
None
ND
Wild
Wild
VI:16
Male
9
None
Normal
20/20
20/20
None
ND
Wild
Wild
VII:1
Male
5
None
Normal
20/30
20/30
None
ND
MT
Wild
VII:2
Female
1
None
Normal
20/30
20/200
Hyperopia
ND
Wild
Wild
MT: mutation; ND: not detected; LP: light perception; NLP: nonlight perception.


### 2.2. Mutation Screening

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples of 39 family members (Table1) using a QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s standard procedure. All coding exons and intron-exon boundaries of the CYP4V2 gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers described by Li et al. [9]. The PCR products were subsequently purified with a TIANgen Mini Purification Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) and sequenced by Sanger sequencing with an ABI BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit v3.1 (Applied Biosystems (ABI), Foster City, CA). CYP4V2 sequencing was performed in eight patients (III:9, IV:1, IV:6, IV:12, V:1, V:12, VI:1, and VI:2), and the detected mutation was further screened in 12 affected family members and 11 unaffected members.Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was then applied to two affected family members with RP (III:9 and IV:1), who did not haveCYP4V2 mutations, then to identify disease-causing variants in 47 RP-related genes including the PRPF31, CRB1, PRPF8, CA4, TULP1, PRPF3, ABCA4, RPE65, EYS, CERKL, NRL, FAM161A, FSCN2, TOPORS, SNRNP200, SEMA4A, PRCD, NR2E3, MERTK, USH2A, PDE6B, PROM1, KLHL7, PDE6A, RGR, CNGB1, IDH3B, SAG, GUCA1B, CNGA1, BEST1, TTC8, C2orf71, ARL6, IMPG2, PDE6G, ZNF513, DHDDS, PRPF6, CLRN1, MAK, CDHR1, FLVCR1, RLBP1, SPATA7, AIPL1, and LRAT genes. The detected variants in NGS were validated by Sanger sequencing and screened in other 6 affected and 7 unaffected individuals in the family.


## 2.1. Pedigree

A pedigree consisted of 56 individuals in 5 generations was recruited. The Ethics Review Board of the Southwest Hospital (Chongqing, China) approved the research protocol (number 2012-11), which adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.The proband (Figure1, VI:1) was initially presented to our medical institution for genetic counseling based on the observation that most of the family members developed night blindness and visual loss and even complete blindness, resulting in an inability to work. This five-generation family from Southwest of China was assessed in terms of RP and BCD. Thirty-nine participants were ascertained at the Southwest Eye Hospital, Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China (Figure 1). No consanguineous marriage in the family was declared.Figure 1
Pedigree plot. The proband is indicated by an arrow. One affected patient with red solid box showed clinical findings compatible to the diagnosis of Bietti’s crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy (VI:1), and the other affected members with black solid box presented clinical features of retinitis pigmentosa. Males and females are represented by squares and circles, respectively. Filled symbols: affected members; open symbols: unaffected members.The proband presented clinical features that were compatible with a diagnosis of BCD (VI:1), and the family members were subsequently evaluated. Twenty-two living individuals in the family had the clinical features of RP and presented similar symptoms of night blindness and progressive reduction in their field of vision. The RP phenotype followed an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance in this pedigree (Figure1).Thirteen affected individuals (III:9, IV:1, IV:3, IV:5, IV:6, IV:10, IV:12, IV:14, IV:20, V:3, V:9, V:12, and VI:1) and twenty-six unaffected family members (Table1) underwent examination, including best-corrected visual acuity testing with the Snellen vision chart, fundoscopy, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT, Spectralis OCT, Version 6.0; Heidelberg Engineering, Germany), full-field electroretinogram (FERG), and multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). For the ages 6 months, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years old, the visual acuity was assessed using Teller acuity cards and then converted into Snellen vision chart.Table 1
Demographic and clinical features and genotypes ofPRPF3 and CYP4V2 mutations in a family with adRP and arBCD.
Number
Gender
Age
First symptom
Phenotype
BCVA
Eye complications
Systemic diseases
PRPF3 mutation
CYP4V2 mutations
OD
OS
c.1481C>G
c.802-8_810del17insGC
c.992A>C
III:8
Female
76
None
Normal
20/250
20/250
Cataract
ND
ND
ND
III:9
Male
80
Night blindness
RP
LP
LP
Cataract
MT
Wild
Wild
III:10
Female
80
None
Normal
20/50
20/50
Cataract
ND
ND
ND
IV:1
Female
82
Night blindness
RP
LP
LP
Cataract
MT
Wild
Wild
IV:3
Male
57
Night blindness
RP
LP
LP
Cataract
ND
Wild
Wild
IV:5
Male
57
Night blindness
RP
LP
LP
Cataract
ND
ND
ND
IV:6
Male
57
Night blindness
RP
LP
LP
Cataract
MT
Wild
Wild
IV:7
Female
54
None
Normal
20/30
20/30
None
Wild
Wild
Wild
IV:10
Male
39
Night blindness
RP
20/200
20/200
None
MT
Wild
Wild
IV:12
Male
35
Night blindness
RP
20/400
LP
None
ND
Wild
Wild
IV:14
Male
55
Night blindness
RP
20/100
20/200
Cataract
MT
Wild
Wild
IV:15
Female
50
None
Normal
20/35
20/35
None
ND
ND
ND
IV:16
Female
51
None
Normal
20/35
20/20
None
ND
ND
ND
IV:18
Male
49
None
Normal
20/20
20/20
None
ND
ND
ND
IV:20
Male
45
Night blindness
RP
20/100
20/200
None
MT
Wild
Wild
V:1
Female
57
None
Normal
20/20
20/25
None
Breast cancer
ND
MT
Wild
V:2
Male
60
None
Normal
20/30
20/30
Cataract
Fatty liver disease
ND
Wild
MT
V:3
Female
55
Night blindness
RP
20/10
20/200
None
Breast cancer
MT
Wild
Wild
V:7
Male
45
None
Normal
20/30
20/30
Myopia
Wild
Wild
Wild
V:8
Female
46
None
Normal
20/18
20/18
None
Wild
Wild
Wild
V:9
Male
43
Night blindness
RP
20/200
LP
Myopia
MT
Wild
Wild
V:11
Male
24
None
Normal
20/18
20/18
None
Wild
Wild
Wild
V:12
Male
22
Night blindness
RP
20/100
20/100
Myopia
MT
Wild
Wild
V:13
Male
13
None
Normal
20/30
20/20
None
ND
Wild
Wild
V:15
Female
8
None
Normal
20/20
20/20
None
ND
Wild
Wild
V:17
Male
37
None
Normal
20/25
20/25
None
ND
Wild
Wild
V:18
Female
35
None
Normal
20/18
20/18
High myopia
ND
ND
ND
V:19
Female
35
None
Normal
20/25
20/20
Myopia
ND
ND
ND
V:20
Male
33
None
Normal
20/18
20/18
None
Wild
Wild
Wild
V:31
Male
15
None
Normal
20/18
20/18
Myopia
ND
ND
ND
VI:1
Male
33
Decreased vision
BCD
20/25
20/30
Myopia, uveitis
Wild
MT
MT
VI:2
Female
29
None
Normal
20/40
20/50
High myopia
ND
ND
ND
VI:10
Female
22
None
Normal
20/18
20/18
Myopia
ND
Wild
Wild
VI:12
Male
15
None
Normal
20/20
20/20
None
ND
Wild
Wild
VI:14
Male
13
None
Normal
20/20
20/20
None
ND
Wild
Wild
VI:15
Male
10
None
Normal
20/20
20/20
None
ND
Wild
Wild
VI:16
Male
9
None
Normal
20/20
20/20
None
ND
Wild
Wild
VII:1
Male
5
None
Normal
20/30
20/30
None
ND
MT
Wild
VII:2
Female
1
None
Normal
20/30
20/200
Hyperopia
ND
Wild
Wild
MT: mutation; ND: not detected; LP: light perception; NLP: nonlight perception.


## 2.2. Mutation Screening

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples of 39 family members (Table1) using a QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s standard procedure. All coding exons and intron-exon boundaries of the CYP4V2 gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers described by Li et al. [9]. The PCR products were subsequently purified with a TIANgen Mini Purification Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) and sequenced by Sanger sequencing with an ABI BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit v3.1 (Applied Biosystems (ABI), Foster City, CA). CYP4V2 sequencing was performed in eight patients (III:9, IV:1, IV:6, IV:12, V:1, V:12, VI:1, and VI:2), and the detected mutation was further screened in 12 affected family members and 11 unaffected members.Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was then applied to two affected family members with RP (III:9 and IV:1), who did not haveCYP4V2 mutations, then to identify disease-causing variants in 47 RP-related genes including the PRPF31, CRB1, PRPF8, CA4, TULP1, PRPF3, ABCA4, RPE65, EYS, CERKL, NRL, FAM161A, FSCN2, TOPORS, SNRNP200, SEMA4A, PRCD, NR2E3, MERTK, USH2A, PDE6B, PROM1, KLHL7, PDE6A, RGR, CNGB1, IDH3B, SAG, GUCA1B, CNGA1, BEST1, TTC8, C2orf71, ARL6, IMPG2, PDE6G, ZNF513, DHDDS, PRPF6, CLRN1, MAK, CDHR1, FLVCR1, RLBP1, SPATA7, AIPL1, and LRAT genes. The detected variants in NGS were validated by Sanger sequencing and screened in other 6 affected and 7 unaffected individuals in the family.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Clinical Features

The demographic and clinical features of the living affected members and mutation carriers are summarized in Table1. The age of enrollment ranged from 1 to 82 years. The visual acuity ranged from 20/30 to nonlight perception (NLP). Seven family members had refractive errors, including myopia (ranging −0.75 to −8 diopters) and astigmatism, and twelve members presented with cataract. All affected individuals except for the proband had congenital night blindness, and seven affected members already presented legal blindness. The proband’s mother (V:1) and aunt (V:3) had breast cancer, and his father (V:2) had fatty liver disease.


### 3.2. Mutations in the CYP4V2 Gene

Two previously reportedCYP4V2 mutations (c.802-8_810del17insGC and c.992A>C (p.H331P)) were detected in this family. The proband (VI:1) was compound heterozygous for both mutations. The c.802-8_810del17insGC mutation was maternally derived (V:1), whereas the c.992A>C mutation was paternally inherited (V:2). Two other family members (V:9 and VII:1) were heterozygous for the c.802-8_810del17insGC mutation.


### 3.3. Mutations in the PRPF3 Gene

Targeted NGS of two affected members (IV:1 and III:9) revealed one common missense mutation in thePRPF3 gene (c.1481C>T) (Figure 2), which was then screened by Sanger sequencing in 8 affected (III:9, IV:1, IV:3, IV:6, IV:14, V:9, V:12, and VI:1) and seven unaffected family members (IV:9, V:1,V:7, V:11, V:16, V:20, and VI:13) for cosegregation analysis.Figure 2
The depth and coverage of next-generation sequencing of thePRPF3 gene and the chromatogram obtained by Sanger sequencing (patient III:9). (a) The rectangle shows the averaged sequencing depth and coverage of the family for all 16 exons of the PRPF3 gene as screened by next-generation sequencing. (b) Sanger sequencing detected a heterozygous mutation (c.1481C>T, p.Thr494Met) in PRPF3.
(a)
(b)


### 3.4. Clinical and Molecular Manifestations of Affected Family Members

Two types of clinical and molecular manifestations were observed in this family: (i) a BCD phenotype that was related to the compound heterozygousCYP4V2 mutations and (ii) a RP phenotype that was associated with the PRPF3 mutation and followed an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance.


#### 3.4.1. Type 1 (Proband VI:1)

The proband was a 33-year-old man referred to us for genetic counseling based on a significant decrease in visual acuity starting at the age of 17 years. The patient developed night blindness in his early 30s. He had high myopia (−7.00 D) in both eyes, and best-corrected Snellen visual acuity was 20/30 in his both eyes. There was a history of chronic uveitis in his left eye since age 28. He was diagnosed with BCD based on clinical findings that included numerous tiny glistening yellow-white crystals scattered at the posterior pole of the retina, RPE atrophy (Figure3), and decreased responses in FERGs and mfERGs.Figure 3
Fundal images and chromatograms of the proband with a clinical diagnosis with Bietti’s crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy and harboring compound heterozygous mutations in theCYP4V2 gene (patient VI:1). Fundal photographs (a, b), autofluorescence images (c, d), and near-infrared images (e, f) of both eyes are shown on the left, and chromatograms of two mutations are demonstrated on the right (g, h).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)Two previously reported disease-causing mutations inCYP4V2 (c.802-8_810del17insGC in exon 7 and c.992A>C (p.H331P) in exon 8) were identified in the proband [19]. The compound heterozygosity was confirmed by screening his unaffected parents; his mother (V:1) carried the c.802-8_810del17insGC variant, and his father (V:2) harbored the c.992A>C mutation. The proband’s unaffected son (VII:1) had the c.802-8_810del17insGC mutation, whereas no pathogenic CYP4V2 mutations were detected in the apparently normal daughter (VII:2). Notably, no PRPF3 mutations were detected in the proband.


#### 3.4.2. Type 2

In addition to the proband, other family members affected with adRP presented with night blindness since birth. Best-corrected visual acuity was from 200/400 to NLP. Fundus examination showed severe features of RP, with a mass of bone-spicule pigmentation depositions, more severe RPE atrophy involving the macular and choroidal sclerosis extending to the midperipheral retina, whereas partial attenuation of the retinal blood vessels, slight waxy pallor of the optic disc, was presented (Figure4). FERG demonstrated undetectable responses both in scotopic and photopic conditions and extinguished mfERG.Figure 4
Fundal photographs and chromatogram of a patient with severe phenotype of retinitis pigmentosa and harboringPRPF3 mutations (patient IV:12). Fundal photographs of the right eye (a, b) and the left eye (c, d), and chromatogram of the PRPF3 mutation (c.1481C>T, p.T494M) is shown (e).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)OnePRPF3 mutation, c.1481C>T (p.T494M), was detected in 13 family members, including 11 males and 2 females. No novel mutation and previously reported mutations were detected in the other 45 genes in the panel. The identified mutation (c.1481C>T) cosegregated with the RP phenotype in 11 affected family members tested and was not observed in 9 unaffected family members (Figure 1). This mutation was observed across four generations. Taken together, the c.1481C>T mutation was considered to be the main cause of adRP in this family.


## 3.1. Clinical Features

The demographic and clinical features of the living affected members and mutation carriers are summarized in Table1. The age of enrollment ranged from 1 to 82 years. The visual acuity ranged from 20/30 to nonlight perception (NLP). Seven family members had refractive errors, including myopia (ranging −0.75 to −8 diopters) and astigmatism, and twelve members presented with cataract. All affected individuals except for the proband had congenital night blindness, and seven affected members already presented legal blindness. The proband’s mother (V:1) and aunt (V:3) had breast cancer, and his father (V:2) had fatty liver disease.


## 3.2. Mutations in the CYP4V2 Gene

Two previously reportedCYP4V2 mutations (c.802-8_810del17insGC and c.992A>C (p.H331P)) were detected in this family. The proband (VI:1) was compound heterozygous for both mutations. The c.802-8_810del17insGC mutation was maternally derived (V:1), whereas the c.992A>C mutation was paternally inherited (V:2). Two other family members (V:9 and VII:1) were heterozygous for the c.802-8_810del17insGC mutation.


## 3.3. Mutations in the PRPF3 Gene

Targeted NGS of two affected members (IV:1 and III:9) revealed one common missense mutation in thePRPF3 gene (c.1481C>T) (Figure 2), which was then screened by Sanger sequencing in 8 affected (III:9, IV:1, IV:3, IV:6, IV:14, V:9, V:12, and VI:1) and seven unaffected family members (IV:9, V:1,V:7, V:11, V:16, V:20, and VI:13) for cosegregation analysis.Figure 2
The depth and coverage of next-generation sequencing of thePRPF3 gene and the chromatogram obtained by Sanger sequencing (patient III:9). (a) The rectangle shows the averaged sequencing depth and coverage of the family for all 16 exons of the PRPF3 gene as screened by next-generation sequencing. (b) Sanger sequencing detected a heterozygous mutation (c.1481C>T, p.Thr494Met) in PRPF3.
(a)
(b)


## 3.4. Clinical and Molecular Manifestations of Affected Family Members

Two types of clinical and molecular manifestations were observed in this family: (i) a BCD phenotype that was related to the compound heterozygousCYP4V2 mutations and (ii) a RP phenotype that was associated with the PRPF3 mutation and followed an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance.


### 3.4.1. Type 1 (Proband VI:1)

The proband was a 33-year-old man referred to us for genetic counseling based on a significant decrease in visual acuity starting at the age of 17 years. The patient developed night blindness in his early 30s. He had high myopia (−7.00 D) in both eyes, and best-corrected Snellen visual acuity was 20/30 in his both eyes. There was a history of chronic uveitis in his left eye since age 28. He was diagnosed with BCD based on clinical findings that included numerous tiny glistening yellow-white crystals scattered at the posterior pole of the retina, RPE atrophy (Figure3), and decreased responses in FERGs and mfERGs.Figure 3
Fundal images and chromatograms of the proband with a clinical diagnosis with Bietti’s crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy and harboring compound heterozygous mutations in theCYP4V2 gene (patient VI:1). Fundal photographs (a, b), autofluorescence images (c, d), and near-infrared images (e, f) of both eyes are shown on the left, and chromatograms of two mutations are demonstrated on the right (g, h).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)Two previously reported disease-causing mutations inCYP4V2 (c.802-8_810del17insGC in exon 7 and c.992A>C (p.H331P) in exon 8) were identified in the proband [19]. The compound heterozygosity was confirmed by screening his unaffected parents; his mother (V:1) carried the c.802-8_810del17insGC variant, and his father (V:2) harbored the c.992A>C mutation. The proband’s unaffected son (VII:1) had the c.802-8_810del17insGC mutation, whereas no pathogenic CYP4V2 mutations were detected in the apparently normal daughter (VII:2). Notably, no PRPF3 mutations were detected in the proband.


### 3.4.2. Type 2

In addition to the proband, other family members affected with adRP presented with night blindness since birth. Best-corrected visual acuity was from 200/400 to NLP. Fundus examination showed severe features of RP, with a mass of bone-spicule pigmentation depositions, more severe RPE atrophy involving the macular and choroidal sclerosis extending to the midperipheral retina, whereas partial attenuation of the retinal blood vessels, slight waxy pallor of the optic disc, was presented (Figure4). FERG demonstrated undetectable responses both in scotopic and photopic conditions and extinguished mfERG.Figure 4
Fundal photographs and chromatogram of a patient with severe phenotype of retinitis pigmentosa and harboringPRPF3 mutations (patient IV:12). Fundal photographs of the right eye (a, b) and the left eye (c, d), and chromatogram of the PRPF3 mutation (c.1481C>T, p.T494M) is shown (e).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)OnePRPF3 mutation, c.1481C>T (p.T494M), was detected in 13 family members, including 11 males and 2 females. No novel mutation and previously reported mutations were detected in the other 45 genes in the panel. The identified mutation (c.1481C>T) cosegregated with the RP phenotype in 11 affected family members tested and was not observed in 9 unaffected family members (Figure 1). This mutation was observed across four generations. Taken together, the c.1481C>T mutation was considered to be the main cause of adRP in this family.


## 3.4.1. Type 1 (Proband VI:1)

The proband was a 33-year-old man referred to us for genetic counseling based on a significant decrease in visual acuity starting at the age of 17 years. The patient developed night blindness in his early 30s. He had high myopia (−7.00 D) in both eyes, and best-corrected Snellen visual acuity was 20/30 in his both eyes. There was a history of chronic uveitis in his left eye since age 28. He was diagnosed with BCD based on clinical findings that included numerous tiny glistening yellow-white crystals scattered at the posterior pole of the retina, RPE atrophy (Figure3), and decreased responses in FERGs and mfERGs.Figure 3
Fundal images and chromatograms of the proband with a clinical diagnosis with Bietti’s crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy and harboring compound heterozygous mutations in theCYP4V2 gene (patient VI:1). Fundal photographs (a, b), autofluorescence images (c, d), and near-infrared images (e, f) of both eyes are shown on the left, and chromatograms of two mutations are demonstrated on the right (g, h).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)Two previously reported disease-causing mutations inCYP4V2 (c.802-8_810del17insGC in exon 7 and c.992A>C (p.H331P) in exon 8) were identified in the proband [19]. The compound heterozygosity was confirmed by screening his unaffected parents; his mother (V:1) carried the c.802-8_810del17insGC variant, and his father (V:2) harbored the c.992A>C mutation. The proband’s unaffected son (VII:1) had the c.802-8_810del17insGC mutation, whereas no pathogenic CYP4V2 mutations were detected in the apparently normal daughter (VII:2). Notably, no PRPF3 mutations were detected in the proband.


## 3.4.2. Type 2

In addition to the proband, other family members affected with adRP presented with night blindness since birth. Best-corrected visual acuity was from 200/400 to NLP. Fundus examination showed severe features of RP, with a mass of bone-spicule pigmentation depositions, more severe RPE atrophy involving the macular and choroidal sclerosis extending to the midperipheral retina, whereas partial attenuation of the retinal blood vessels, slight waxy pallor of the optic disc, was presented (Figure4). FERG demonstrated undetectable responses both in scotopic and photopic conditions and extinguished mfERG.Figure 4
Fundal photographs and chromatogram of a patient with severe phenotype of retinitis pigmentosa and harboringPRPF3 mutations (patient IV:12). Fundal photographs of the right eye (a, b) and the left eye (c, d), and chromatogram of the PRPF3 mutation (c.1481C>T, p.T494M) is shown (e).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)OnePRPF3 mutation, c.1481C>T (p.T494M), was detected in 13 family members, including 11 males and 2 females. No novel mutation and previously reported mutations were detected in the other 45 genes in the panel. The identified mutation (c.1481C>T) cosegregated with the RP phenotype in 11 affected family members tested and was not observed in 9 unaffected family members (Figure 1). This mutation was observed across four generations. Taken together, the c.1481C>T mutation was considered to be the main cause of adRP in this family.


## 4. Discussion

PRPF3 (MIM 607301) is a precursor mRNA-processing factor gene that was first identified for adRP in 2002 [20]. In the present study, a pathogenic mutation (c.1481C>T, p.T494M) in the PRPF3 gene was identified in 11 individuals presenting an adRP phenotype in a five-generation Chinese family. The molecular genetic features of a Chinese pedigree with a PRPF3 mutation have been previously reported. The c.1481C>T mutation is considered to be one of the most common mutations in PRPF3 [20–25]. Previous reports have shown that patients harboring the c.1481C>T mutation develop early-onset night blindness, visual field loss, and visual acuity loss between the ages of 30 and 40, as well as loss of ERG responses after the age of 30. Compared to those in previously reported Japanese, Spanish, Korean, Swiss, and North American families, members of this Chinese family with the c.1481C>T mutation presented a more severe disease phenotype, which included congenital blindness, severe visual acuity loss, extended RPE atrophy, and completely extinguished ERG responses.Mutations in theCYP4V2 gene (MIM 608614) are the only known causative factor for BCD to date. The CYP4V2 gene consists of 11 exons and encodes a 525 amino acid protein belonging to the CYP450 family. CYP4V2 is widely expressed in tissues, including the retina, RPE, lymphocytes, heart, brain, placenta, lung, liver, skeletal muscle, kidney, and pancreas, which has been thought to play a crucial role in fatty acid and corticosteroid metabolism. In the present study, two compound heterozygous mutations in CYP4V2 (c.802-8_810del17insGC and c.992A>C) were identified in the proband who presented typical BCD. In our previous study, CYP4V2 mutation screening among 92 Chinese patients with BCD showed that c.802-8_810del17insGC and c.992A>C are common pathogenic mutations in Chinese with BCD [26]. The parents of the proband are not a consanguineous marriage couple. So we speculate that these heterozygous mutations in Chinese population may be universal. This phenomenon may be related to the common ancestor based on the huge population of China. The heterozygous state of the same gene carried by parents is consistent with the autosomal recessive inheritance pattern. This will be important for prenatal testing for family planning, early finding carrier status, and determining risk of inheritance in Chinese.Coexistence of variants in two or three genes associated with retinal degeneration has rarely been reported in a family [3]. In the present study, we identified the coexistence of two distinct phenotypes in one family, namely, BCD and RP, which were caused by the pathogenic variants in the CYP4V2 and PRPF3 genes, respectively. The mode of inheritance of the two diseases was maintained in this family, in which BCD demonstrated an autosomal recessive trait and RP showed an autosomal dominant trait.Two types of clinical and molecular manifestations identified in this study include (i) a BCD phenotype related toCYP4V2 mutations and (ii) an RP phenotype related to PRPF3 variants. Clinical features for (i) BCD and (ii) RP of this family were similar to those in previous reports. The proband affected with BCD in this family had a later onset for night blindness and relatively slow progression, with a predominantly affected choroid at the posterior pole. On the other hand, family members with RP caused by the PRPF3 mutation showed a more severe phenotype. Our study provides a better understanding of the genotype-phenotype correlation in a family with two independent pathogenic gene mutations and may be used in clinics for the differential diagnosis of retinal degenerations.In summary, this is the first report onPRPF3-associated adRP and CYP4V2-associated arBCD in a large multigenerational Chinese family. The inheritance pattern of each gene mutation is independent. Our study provides an insight into the clinical effects of two independent gene mutations in a large family to facilitate accurate diagnosis and disease counseling.



---

*Source: 4156386-2017-08-07.xml*