# PVA/Polysaccharides Blended Films: Mechanical Properties

Authors: Fábio E. F. Silva; Maria Carolina B. Di-Medeiros; Karla A. Batista; Kátia F. Fernandes
Journal: Journal of Materials
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Blends of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and angico gum (AG) and/or cashew gum (CG) were used to produce films by casting method. Morphological and mechanical properties of these films were studied and compared to the properties of a commercial collagen membrane of bovine origin (MBO). The films presented thickness varying from 70 to 140μm (PVA/AG) and 140 to 200 μm (PVA/CG). Macroscopic analysis showed that a PVA/CG film was very similar to MBO regarding the color and transparency. The higher values of tensile strength (TS) and elastic modulus (EM) were observed in the PVA/AGHCl film. On the other hand, PVA/CG and PVA/CG-AG presented the highest value of percentage of elongation (E%). Pearson’s Correlation Analysis revealed a positive correlation (r=0.83) between TS and EM and a negative correlation (r=-0.79) between E% and EM. The PVA/CG film presented mechanical properties very similar to MBO, with the advantage of a higher E% (11.96) than MBO (2.94). The properties of the PVA blended films depended on the polysaccharide added in the blend, as well as the acid used as a catalyst. However, all produced films presented interesting mechanical characteristics which enables several biotechnological applications.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

There has been an expanding search for new materials with high performance at affordable costs in recent years [1]. Particularly important are the efforts to develop new materials with film-forming capacity for biomedical applications. Materials for biomedical applications or biomaterials have been defined as those intended to interface with biological systems to evaluate, treat, augment, or replace any tissue, organ, or function of the body [2]. Currently, bioresorbable and biodegradable membranes have been highlighted in the medical market, owing to their inherent biocompatibility [2, 3].Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) has excellent film-forming properties and has been frequently blended with synthetic and natural polymers due to its water-soluble, biodegradable, innocuous, noncarcinogenic, and biocompatible character [4, 5]. Blended materials assemble the properties of each material on its own. In general, blended materials are made of a material that acts as a matrix, while the other is imbedded in the matrix material improving its mechanical and physical properties. In this sense, the final properties of the blended material depend on the properties of the imbedded material [6].In this scenario, blends of proteins or polysaccharides with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) are promising biodegradable materials since the combination of these polymers may have beneficial effects on the characteristics of the blended material. However, the use of animal proteins in the formulation of biological membranes requires a highly purified material to avoid allergic reactions and increased inflammatory response. The laborious and time-consuming techniques of protein purification result in materials with a high cost.On the other hand, polysaccharides have been explored as biomaterials, particularly when used as scaffolds for tissue regeneration and controlled drug releasing. Several plants produce gummous exudates mainly composed of high-molecular polysaccharides. Studies of several different gummous materials showed that they consist of complex branched polysaccharides with highly varied chemical and structural composition. Red angico (Anadenanthera macrocarpa) produces gummous exudates composed of arabinose (67%), galactose (24%), rhamnose (2%), and glucuronic acid (7%) [7, 8]. Cashew (Anacardium occidentale) also produces gummous exudates, constituted of galactose (72–61%), glucose (14–8%), arabinose (4.6–14%), rhamnose (3.2–7%), and glucuronic acid (4.7–5%) [9–11]. These gummous exudates are inexpensive, nontoxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable polymers with good rheological properties. These factors enable their use for biodegradable membrane fabrication [7, 9].In this research, biodegradable films were manufactured by blending cashew gum and/or angico gum with PVA. The blended films were characterized according to their morphology and mechanical properties. Additionally, in order to evaluate the potential of these blended films, their properties were compared with those presented by a commercially available biomembrane containing collagen (bovine origin).


## 2. Material and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Samples of the cashew exudates (nodules) (Anacardium ocidentale) were collected at CIALNE (Companhia de Alimentos do Nordeste) farm, Pacajus, CE, Brazil. Samples of the angico exudates (nodules) (Anadenanthera macrocarpa) were collected at Anápolis-GO, Brazil. The commercial membrane of bovine origin (MBO) used in this work was purchased from GenDerm (Baumer, Brazil).


### 2.2. Origin and Purification of Polysaccharides

The gum from cashew exudates was extracted according to the methodology described by Silva et al. [9]. Briefly, the nodules were milled, immersed in distilled water in a proportion of 20% (w/v), and kept at room temperature (25°C), for 24 hours. The solution was filtered to remove fragments of bark and then precipitated with absolute ethanol, in the proportion of 1 : 3 (v/v), for 24 hours. The precipitated cashew gum (CG) was separated by filtration, washed with ethanol, dried at room temperature (25°C), and stored at room temperature in hermetically closed vessels.The gums from angico exudates were milled, immersed in distilled water in a proportion of 20% (w/v), and kept at room temperature (25°C), for 24 hours. The solution was filtered to remove fragments of bark and then precipitated with absolute ethanol, in the proportion of 1 : 3 (v/v), for 24 hours. Alternatively, after filtration, the angico gum solution was acidified to pH 4.0 with acetic acid followed by precipitation with cold ethanol. The precipitated angico gum (AG or AGac) was separated by filtration, washed with ethanol, dried at room temperature (25°C), and stored at room temperature in hermetically closed vessels.


### 2.3. The Preparation of the Films

In order to obtain a film with mechanical properties similar to the commercial MBO, several formulations were tested using cashew gum (CG), angico gum (AG), or a mixture of cashew and angico gum.The PVA/CG film was prepared by casting on the glass molds a solution containing a mixture of 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) acidic PVA solution (pH 2.0), 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) cashew gum aqueous solutions, 0.75 mL of 0.1 molL-1 sodium metaperiodate as a cross-linker, and 0.75 mL of 0.1 mol L-1 sulfuric acid as catalyst. The solvent evaporation was left to occur at room temperature (25°C) for 24 hours. The dry films were stored in plastic bags before all subsequent characterization procedures.The PVA/AG films were prepared by casting on the glass molds a solution containing a mixture of 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) acidic PVA solution (pH 2.0), 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) angico gum aqueous solutions, 0.75 mL of 0.1 molL-1 sodium metaperiodate as a cross-linker, and 0.75 mL of 0.1 mol L-1 phosphoric acid (PVA/AGPO4) or 0.1 mol L-1 hydrochloric acid (PVA/AGHCl) as a catalyst. The PVA/AGac film was prepared by casting on the glass molds a solution containing a mixture of 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) acidic PVA solution (pH 2.0), 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) AGac aqueous solution, 0.75 mL of 0.1 mol L-1 sodium metaperiodate as a cross-linker, and 0.75 mL of 0.1 mol L-1 sulfuric acid as a catalyst. The solvent evaporation was left to occur at room temperature (25°C) for 24 hours. The dry films were stored in plastic bags before all subsequent characterization procedures.The PVA/CG-AG film was prepared by casting on the glass molds a solution containing a mixture of 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) acidic PVA solution (pH 2.0), 3.25 mL of 3% (w/v) cashew gum aqueous solutions, 3.25 mL of 3% (w/v) angico gum aqueous solutions, 0.75 mL of 0.1 molL-1 sodium metaperiodate as a cross-linker, and 0.75 mL of 0.1 mol L-1 sulfuric acid as catalyst. The solvent evaporation was left to occur at room temperature (25°C) for 24 hours. The dry films were stored in plastic bags before all subsequent characterization procedures.


### 2.4. Film Characterization

#### 2.4.1. Films Thickness and Morphology

The thickness of the blended films was determined using a manual micrometer (Mitutoyo, São Paulo, Brazil). Final thickness was determined by means of ten random determinations in all film area. The films were analyzed according to morphological overall characteristics such as color, transparency, and homogeneity.


#### 2.4.2. Mechanical Properties

Mechanical properties were determined in an Instron M3345 (Instron Co., Norwood, MA, USA), with a 50 N load cell equipped with tensile grips. Samples of the film were cut into strips of 10 mm wide and 30 mm long, according to the ASTM D-638M-93 standard [12]. The grip separation was set at 10 mm, with a crosshead speed of 5 mm min-1. Each sample used was previously inspected and those containing any defect such as air bubbles, holes, and tears or showing average thickness variation superior to 5% were rejected. All samples were tested with curing time greater than 30 days, in dehydrated state.Tensile strength (TS), percentage of elongation (E%) at break, and elastic modulus (EM) were evaluated using the Software Blue Hill 2 (Instron Co.).  The percentage of elongation (E%) at break was calculated as follows:
(1)Elongation(E%)=(Lf-Li)×100Li,
where Li is the initial length and Lf is the final length.The modulus of elasticity (Young’s modulus) was determined according to the following equation:(2)Modulusofelasticity(Y)=FLiA0ΔL,
where F is the force exerted on an object under tension; A0 is the original cross-sectional area through which the force is applied; ΔL is the amount by which the length of the object changes; and Li is the original length of the object.


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were expressed as average± standard deviation (X±SD). The variance analysis and Tukey’s test were used to define differences in mean values of the data from 3 to 6 replicates. The variance analyses were carried out using the software Statistica 6.0 (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA, 1997). The means of the treatment with the same letters are not significantly different (P≤0.05).


## 2.1. Materials

Samples of the cashew exudates (nodules) (Anacardium ocidentale) were collected at CIALNE (Companhia de Alimentos do Nordeste) farm, Pacajus, CE, Brazil. Samples of the angico exudates (nodules) (Anadenanthera macrocarpa) were collected at Anápolis-GO, Brazil. The commercial membrane of bovine origin (MBO) used in this work was purchased from GenDerm (Baumer, Brazil).


## 2.2. Origin and Purification of Polysaccharides

The gum from cashew exudates was extracted according to the methodology described by Silva et al. [9]. Briefly, the nodules were milled, immersed in distilled water in a proportion of 20% (w/v), and kept at room temperature (25°C), for 24 hours. The solution was filtered to remove fragments of bark and then precipitated with absolute ethanol, in the proportion of 1 : 3 (v/v), for 24 hours. The precipitated cashew gum (CG) was separated by filtration, washed with ethanol, dried at room temperature (25°C), and stored at room temperature in hermetically closed vessels.The gums from angico exudates were milled, immersed in distilled water in a proportion of 20% (w/v), and kept at room temperature (25°C), for 24 hours. The solution was filtered to remove fragments of bark and then precipitated with absolute ethanol, in the proportion of 1 : 3 (v/v), for 24 hours. Alternatively, after filtration, the angico gum solution was acidified to pH 4.0 with acetic acid followed by precipitation with cold ethanol. The precipitated angico gum (AG or AGac) was separated by filtration, washed with ethanol, dried at room temperature (25°C), and stored at room temperature in hermetically closed vessels.


## 2.3. The Preparation of the Films

In order to obtain a film with mechanical properties similar to the commercial MBO, several formulations were tested using cashew gum (CG), angico gum (AG), or a mixture of cashew and angico gum.The PVA/CG film was prepared by casting on the glass molds a solution containing a mixture of 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) acidic PVA solution (pH 2.0), 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) cashew gum aqueous solutions, 0.75 mL of 0.1 molL-1 sodium metaperiodate as a cross-linker, and 0.75 mL of 0.1 mol L-1 sulfuric acid as catalyst. The solvent evaporation was left to occur at room temperature (25°C) for 24 hours. The dry films were stored in plastic bags before all subsequent characterization procedures.The PVA/AG films were prepared by casting on the glass molds a solution containing a mixture of 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) acidic PVA solution (pH 2.0), 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) angico gum aqueous solutions, 0.75 mL of 0.1 molL-1 sodium metaperiodate as a cross-linker, and 0.75 mL of 0.1 mol L-1 phosphoric acid (PVA/AGPO4) or 0.1 mol L-1 hydrochloric acid (PVA/AGHCl) as a catalyst. The PVA/AGac film was prepared by casting on the glass molds a solution containing a mixture of 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) acidic PVA solution (pH 2.0), 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) AGac aqueous solution, 0.75 mL of 0.1 mol L-1 sodium metaperiodate as a cross-linker, and 0.75 mL of 0.1 mol L-1 sulfuric acid as a catalyst. The solvent evaporation was left to occur at room temperature (25°C) for 24 hours. The dry films were stored in plastic bags before all subsequent characterization procedures.The PVA/CG-AG film was prepared by casting on the glass molds a solution containing a mixture of 7.5 mL of 3% (w/v) acidic PVA solution (pH 2.0), 3.25 mL of 3% (w/v) cashew gum aqueous solutions, 3.25 mL of 3% (w/v) angico gum aqueous solutions, 0.75 mL of 0.1 molL-1 sodium metaperiodate as a cross-linker, and 0.75 mL of 0.1 mol L-1 sulfuric acid as catalyst. The solvent evaporation was left to occur at room temperature (25°C) for 24 hours. The dry films were stored in plastic bags before all subsequent characterization procedures.


## 2.4. Film Characterization

### 2.4.1. Films Thickness and Morphology

The thickness of the blended films was determined using a manual micrometer (Mitutoyo, São Paulo, Brazil). Final thickness was determined by means of ten random determinations in all film area. The films were analyzed according to morphological overall characteristics such as color, transparency, and homogeneity.


### 2.4.2. Mechanical Properties

Mechanical properties were determined in an Instron M3345 (Instron Co., Norwood, MA, USA), with a 50 N load cell equipped with tensile grips. Samples of the film were cut into strips of 10 mm wide and 30 mm long, according to the ASTM D-638M-93 standard [12]. The grip separation was set at 10 mm, with a crosshead speed of 5 mm min-1. Each sample used was previously inspected and those containing any defect such as air bubbles, holes, and tears or showing average thickness variation superior to 5% were rejected. All samples were tested with curing time greater than 30 days, in dehydrated state.Tensile strength (TS), percentage of elongation (E%) at break, and elastic modulus (EM) were evaluated using the Software Blue Hill 2 (Instron Co.).  The percentage of elongation (E%) at break was calculated as follows:
(1)Elongation(E%)=(Lf-Li)×100Li,
where Li is the initial length and Lf is the final length.The modulus of elasticity (Young’s modulus) was determined according to the following equation:(2)Modulusofelasticity(Y)=FLiA0ΔL,
where F is the force exerted on an object under tension; A0 is the original cross-sectional area through which the force is applied; ΔL is the amount by which the length of the object changes; and Li is the original length of the object.


## 2.4.1. Films Thickness and Morphology

The thickness of the blended films was determined using a manual micrometer (Mitutoyo, São Paulo, Brazil). Final thickness was determined by means of ten random determinations in all film area. The films were analyzed according to morphological overall characteristics such as color, transparency, and homogeneity.


## 2.4.2. Mechanical Properties

Mechanical properties were determined in an Instron M3345 (Instron Co., Norwood, MA, USA), with a 50 N load cell equipped with tensile grips. Samples of the film were cut into strips of 10 mm wide and 30 mm long, according to the ASTM D-638M-93 standard [12]. The grip separation was set at 10 mm, with a crosshead speed of 5 mm min-1. Each sample used was previously inspected and those containing any defect such as air bubbles, holes, and tears or showing average thickness variation superior to 5% were rejected. All samples were tested with curing time greater than 30 days, in dehydrated state.Tensile strength (TS), percentage of elongation (E%) at break, and elastic modulus (EM) were evaluated using the Software Blue Hill 2 (Instron Co.).  The percentage of elongation (E%) at break was calculated as follows:
(1)Elongation(E%)=(Lf-Li)×100Li,
where Li is the initial length and Lf is the final length.The modulus of elasticity (Young’s modulus) was determined according to the following equation:(2)Modulusofelasticity(Y)=FLiA0ΔL,
where F is the force exerted on an object under tension; A0 is the original cross-sectional area through which the force is applied; ΔL is the amount by which the length of the object changes; and Li is the original length of the object.


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were expressed as average± standard deviation (X±SD). The variance analysis and Tukey’s test were used to define differences in mean values of the data from 3 to 6 replicates. The variance analyses were carried out using the software Statistica 6.0 (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA, 1997). The means of the treatment with the same letters are not significantly different (P≤0.05).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Appearance of the Films

The PVA/CG films presented thickness values between 140 to 200μm, while PVA/AG films presented thickness around 70 and 140 μm. Figure 1 shows samples of formulated films and the membrane of bovine origin (MBO). As can be observed, the produced films presented a high diversity of color and transparency. Among them, the PVA/CG films presented the higher transparency and slightly white color, very similar to MBO.Macroscopic morphology of the films: (a) MBO; (b) PVA/CG film; (c) PVA/CG-AG film; (d) PVA/AGPO4 film; (e) PVA/AGHCl film; and (f) PVA/AGac film.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


### 3.2. Mechanical Properties

Artificial membranes have focus of special attention owing to their potential application in the medical fields, such as drug delivery systems, artificial organs, and tissue engineering [13]. To every application, specific mechanical features are required. In general, the mechanical properties of the films produced by blending PVA with CG were similar to those of the MBO (Table 1), whereas films with AG or AGac had mechanical properties slightly different.Table 1
Mechanical properties of blended films.
Tensile strength
Elongation
Elastic modulus
(kgf)
(%)
(kgf)
MBO
193.61b
2.94b
6568.14b
PVA/CG
151.84b
11.96a
1305.25c
PVA/CG-AG
218.17b
13.24a
1800.85c
PVA/AGPO4
227.97b
4.87b
4773.82b
PVA/AGHCl
426.46a
3.80b
11590.02a
PVA/AGac
221.30b
3.18b
6972.95b
a,  b, and  c: The results are the means of three determinations. Within columns, means with the same superscript letter are not significantly different (P>0.05).The behavior of the films under tension test is depicted in Figure2. Analyzing the behavior of the MBO under tension test (Figure 2(a)), it is possible to observe three zones—the first characterized by an increase in the load accompanied by extension of the film, followed by a zone in which the extension occurs without increases in the load and the point of rupture of the film. As can be seen, the extension of MBO film occurred at a maximum load of 3.65 kgf. Similar behavior was observed for PVA/CG film (Figure 2(b)) although the maximum load to extend the film has been 2.49 kgf.Typical behavior of films under tension tests: (a) MBO; (b) PVA/CG film; (c) PVA/CG-AG film; (d) PVA/AGPO4 film; (e) PVA/AGHCl film; and (f) PVA/AGac film.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)Regarding PVA/AG (Figures2(d) and 2(e)) or PVA/AGac films (Figure 2(f)), the tension test showed an absence of an elastic zone. It seems that the acid used as a catalyst may influence the load necessary to extend the film. The PVA/AGac film required the highest load to rupture (5.0 kgf).The films produced by blending PVA/CG-AG presented the best set of features regarding the properties of strength and flexibility (Figure2(c)).The different behavior observed for the blended films may be ascribed to the chemical structure of the polysaccharides. The property of starches to produce film is related to the relative amount of amylose and amylopectin present in the starch granule. The branching degree and the relative amount of amylopectin present in the starch granule will determine the elastic property of the produced film [14]. In this sense, the different behavior of the blended films may be ascribed to different branching degree or the higher molar mass of AG (3.7×106 g mol−1) compared to CG (6.41×104 g mol−1) [7, 15].The mechanical characteristics of PVA blended films are shown in Table1. The tensile strength (TS) is defined as the capacity of resistance to rupture presented by the material when submitted to pressure force [16]. On the other hand, the percentage of elongation (E%) is related to the elasticity of a material since it is measured through the extension under traction. The blended films showed TS and E% quite diverse.The film that presented the higher TS was PVA/AGHCl with a value twofold higher than MBO. However, the value of E% of PVA/AGHCl did not differ from that of MBO. From these results, it is possible to infer that the polymers chains in the blended film are tightly bounded, with a very low degree of flexibility.On the other hand, the PVA/CG film showed a remarkable percentage of elongation (E%), fourfold higher than MBO. It seems that the polymers chains of the blended film, although covalently bounded, preserved a certain degree of chain flexibility.Regarding the elastic modulus (EM), three groups with distinct properties were observed: (i) PVA/AGHCl with the highest value of EM; (ii) MBO, PVA/AGPO4, and PVA/AGac with EM around 6900–4700 kgf; and (iii) PVA/CG and PVA/CG-AG, with values of EM around 1300–1800 kgf (Table 1).The results of the correlation analysis evidenced a positive relationship between TS and EM (r=0.84), whereas the E% had a negative correlation with EM (r=-0.79). This observation is evidenced in Figure 3.Graphic representation of Pearson’s correlation between (a) percentage of elongation (E%) and elastic modulus (EM), (b) tensile strength (TS) and percentage of elongation (E%),  and (c) tensile strength (TS) and elastic modulus (EM).
(a)
(b)
(c)Considering the macroscopic features and the mechanical properties of the blended films, the PVA/CG showed characteristics that enable this material to substitute the MBO with the advantage of higherE%. Furthermore, the composition of PVA/CG is advantageous regarding the safety of the material used, since it uses a plant polysaccharide instead of an animal protein.Although the films produced with angico gum presented inferior macroscopic characteristics, the PVA/AGHCl film showed remarkable mechanical properties such as the high values of TS and EM. In this sense, this material is also promising for biotechnological applications.


## 3.1. Appearance of the Films

The PVA/CG films presented thickness values between 140 to 200μm, while PVA/AG films presented thickness around 70 and 140 μm. Figure 1 shows samples of formulated films and the membrane of bovine origin (MBO). As can be observed, the produced films presented a high diversity of color and transparency. Among them, the PVA/CG films presented the higher transparency and slightly white color, very similar to MBO.Macroscopic morphology of the films: (a) MBO; (b) PVA/CG film; (c) PVA/CG-AG film; (d) PVA/AGPO4 film; (e) PVA/AGHCl film; and (f) PVA/AGac film.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


## 3.2. Mechanical Properties

Artificial membranes have focus of special attention owing to their potential application in the medical fields, such as drug delivery systems, artificial organs, and tissue engineering [13]. To every application, specific mechanical features are required. In general, the mechanical properties of the films produced by blending PVA with CG were similar to those of the MBO (Table 1), whereas films with AG or AGac had mechanical properties slightly different.Table 1
Mechanical properties of blended films.
Tensile strength
Elongation
Elastic modulus
(kgf)
(%)
(kgf)
MBO
193.61b
2.94b
6568.14b
PVA/CG
151.84b
11.96a
1305.25c
PVA/CG-AG
218.17b
13.24a
1800.85c
PVA/AGPO4
227.97b
4.87b
4773.82b
PVA/AGHCl
426.46a
3.80b
11590.02a
PVA/AGac
221.30b
3.18b
6972.95b
a,  b, and  c: The results are the means of three determinations. Within columns, means with the same superscript letter are not significantly different (P>0.05).The behavior of the films under tension test is depicted in Figure2. Analyzing the behavior of the MBO under tension test (Figure 2(a)), it is possible to observe three zones—the first characterized by an increase in the load accompanied by extension of the film, followed by a zone in which the extension occurs without increases in the load and the point of rupture of the film. As can be seen, the extension of MBO film occurred at a maximum load of 3.65 kgf. Similar behavior was observed for PVA/CG film (Figure 2(b)) although the maximum load to extend the film has been 2.49 kgf.Typical behavior of films under tension tests: (a) MBO; (b) PVA/CG film; (c) PVA/CG-AG film; (d) PVA/AGPO4 film; (e) PVA/AGHCl film; and (f) PVA/AGac film.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)Regarding PVA/AG (Figures2(d) and 2(e)) or PVA/AGac films (Figure 2(f)), the tension test showed an absence of an elastic zone. It seems that the acid used as a catalyst may influence the load necessary to extend the film. The PVA/AGac film required the highest load to rupture (5.0 kgf).The films produced by blending PVA/CG-AG presented the best set of features regarding the properties of strength and flexibility (Figure2(c)).The different behavior observed for the blended films may be ascribed to the chemical structure of the polysaccharides. The property of starches to produce film is related to the relative amount of amylose and amylopectin present in the starch granule. The branching degree and the relative amount of amylopectin present in the starch granule will determine the elastic property of the produced film [14]. In this sense, the different behavior of the blended films may be ascribed to different branching degree or the higher molar mass of AG (3.7×106 g mol−1) compared to CG (6.41×104 g mol−1) [7, 15].The mechanical characteristics of PVA blended films are shown in Table1. The tensile strength (TS) is defined as the capacity of resistance to rupture presented by the material when submitted to pressure force [16]. On the other hand, the percentage of elongation (E%) is related to the elasticity of a material since it is measured through the extension under traction. The blended films showed TS and E% quite diverse.The film that presented the higher TS was PVA/AGHCl with a value twofold higher than MBO. However, the value of E% of PVA/AGHCl did not differ from that of MBO. From these results, it is possible to infer that the polymers chains in the blended film are tightly bounded, with a very low degree of flexibility.On the other hand, the PVA/CG film showed a remarkable percentage of elongation (E%), fourfold higher than MBO. It seems that the polymers chains of the blended film, although covalently bounded, preserved a certain degree of chain flexibility.Regarding the elastic modulus (EM), three groups with distinct properties were observed: (i) PVA/AGHCl with the highest value of EM; (ii) MBO, PVA/AGPO4, and PVA/AGac with EM around 6900–4700 kgf; and (iii) PVA/CG and PVA/CG-AG, with values of EM around 1300–1800 kgf (Table 1).The results of the correlation analysis evidenced a positive relationship between TS and EM (r=0.84), whereas the E% had a negative correlation with EM (r=-0.79). This observation is evidenced in Figure 3.Graphic representation of Pearson’s correlation between (a) percentage of elongation (E%) and elastic modulus (EM), (b) tensile strength (TS) and percentage of elongation (E%),  and (c) tensile strength (TS) and elastic modulus (EM).
(a)
(b)
(c)Considering the macroscopic features and the mechanical properties of the blended films, the PVA/CG showed characteristics that enable this material to substitute the MBO with the advantage of higherE%. Furthermore, the composition of PVA/CG is advantageous regarding the safety of the material used, since it uses a plant polysaccharide instead of an animal protein.Although the films produced with angico gum presented inferior macroscopic characteristics, the PVA/AGHCl film showed remarkable mechanical properties such as the high values of TS and EM. In this sense, this material is also promising for biotechnological applications.


## 4. Conclusion

The films produced by blending PVA with AG and/or CG presented quite different macroscopic and mechanical properties. Among them, the PVA/CG film presented the macroscopic and mechanical properties similar to MBO film, with the advantage of a higherE% (11.96) than MBO (2.94). On the other hand, the PVA/AGHCl presented higher values of TS and EM. The inclusion of CG in the blend PVA/AG-CG improved the E% of this film, compared to the other PVA/AG films. Finally, all produced films presented interesting mechanical characteristics, which enables several biotechnological applications.



---

*Source: 413578-2013-04-04.xml*