# The Role of Education and Intellectual Activity on Cognition

Authors: Jeanine M. Parisi; George W. Rebok; Qian-Li Xue; Linda P. Fried; Teresa E. Seeman; Elizabeth K. Tanner; Tara L. Gruenewald; Kevin D. Frick; Michelle C. Carlson
Journal: Journal of Aging Research
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Although educational attainment has been consistently related to cognition in adulthood, the mechanisms are still unclear. Early education, and other social learning experiences, may provide the skills, knowledge, and interest to pursue intellectual challenges across the life course. Therefore, cognition in adulthood might reflect continued engagement with cognitively complex environments. Using baseline data from the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial, multiple mediation models were applied to examine the combined and unique contributions of intellectual, social, physical, creative, and passive lifestyle activities on the relationship between education and cognition. Separate models were tested for each cognitive outcome (i.e., reading ability, processing speed, memory). With the exception of memory tasks, findings suggest that education-cognition relations are partially explained by frequent participation in intellectual activities. The association between education and cognition was not completely eliminated, however, suggesting that other factors may drive these associations.


---

## Body

## 1. The Role of Education and IntellectualActivity on Cognition

Cognitive enrichment early in life may account for some of the variation in cognitive ability in adulthood. Consistently, higher educational attainment is associated with greater levels of cognitive performance [1–5], as well as with a reduced risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease [6–9]. Although the exact mechanisms are unclear, one possibility is that educational experiences provide the foundation for continued intellectual stimulation across the life course, resulting in improved cognitive functioning in late adulthood. Prior research findings contribute to the plausibility of this assumption. First, educational attainment is often associated with greater participation in various lifestyle activities [10, 11], especially those that are cognitively demanding [12–14]. Second, the beneficial effects of maintaining an engaged lifestyle have been demonstrated across several studies, even when activities are introduced later in life [15–19].Education may cultivate the knowledge, skills, and ability necessary for continued participation in intellectually demanding activities (e.g., reading, taking courses) well into later adulthood. According to the engagement hypothesis, individuals who continuously place significant demands on their intellectual resources (i.e., through multiple and complex decisions, ill-defined problem solving) may maintain or even enhance cognitive potential [3, 20, 21]. Therefore, compared to other forms of lifestyle activity, greater participation in intellectually demanding activities may be especially beneficial for cognitive function [3, 10, 14, 20–24]. For instance, Hultsch et al. [10] found that individuals who more frequently participated in novel information processing were less likely to show cognitive declines over time. Likewise, Ghisletta and colleagues [25] found that activities such as reading a book and playing games were related to changes in perceptual speed, whereas other forms of engagement (e.g., physical, social, and religious activities) were not associated with such changes. Conversely, activities low in cognitive stimulation, such as watching television, have been related to an increased risk of cognitive impairment [26]. Moreover, activities low in cognitive demand may be more prevalent among those with lower educational attainment [27].Although several studies have explored the independent contributions of education or activity on cognition, few studies have explored these factors in combination. The current study examines whether educational attainment and late-life activities contribute independently to cognitive performance or if education-cognition relations can be at least partly explained by participation in activities in adulthood. Specifically, our work is driven by the following assumptions: (1) education will be associated with cognition, such that individuals with higher levels of educational attainment will demonstrate better performance on cognitive measures; (2) older adults with higher levels of educational attainment will report being more active, especially in intellectually demanding activities; (3) intellectual activities will influence cognition, such that participation in intellectually demanding activities (as compared to other forms of activity) will be related to better cognitive performance, independent of education. Consequently, we expect that the association between education and cognition will be attenuated (not completely eliminated) once participation in a wide variety of lifestyle activities is considered [28, 29]. Further, we also expect that the effects will be greatest for intellectually demanding activities, as these may be more strongly associated with both education and cognition [1–5, 10, 12–14].We wish to be clear that this cross-sectional, correlational research does not allow us to establish the temporal ordering among variables and acknowledge that reciprocal relationships could be possible. Therefore, we cannot draw any conclusions regarding causal relationships between education, activity and cognition as implied by our theoretically based model (i.e., education leads to greater participation in activities, which in turn, promotes cognition). However, in the absence of longitudinal data, establishing associations among education, activity, and cognition allows us to better conceptualize plausible mechanisms for the promotion of cognitive health in adulthood.


## 2. Methods

We report data collected as part of the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial (see Fried and colleagues [30] for detailed description of recruitment procedures and study design), a community-based volunteer program designed as a health promotion model for older adults while simultaneously addressing the academic needs of elementary school children [30, 31]. Briefly, in this program older adults (age 60 and older) are trained and placed into elementary school classrooms (kindergarten to third grade) to serve as mentors and tutors for young children. To be eligible to serve as a volunteer, individuals had to meet screening criteria for general cognitive status (as indicated by a score of greater than 23 on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)) [32] and perform at a sixth grade reading level or higher on a measure of functional literacy, the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT-4) [33]. The data we report are based on baseline scores for measures before participants (N
=
702) were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: to the intervention (Experience Corps program) or to a low-activity control group.


### 2.1. Sample

For purposes of the present analyses, individuals were included (n
=
675) if they completed the Lifestyle Activities Questionnaire (LAQ) [16] and cognitive measures as part of the baseline assessment. Participants were, on average, 67 years of age (SD = 5.95, range = 60–89 years), had 13.9 years of education (SD = 2.94, range = 6–22 years), and were predominantly female (84.6%) and African American (90.5%) (Table 1). In addition, participants reported their current health as excellent, very good, or good (89.1%) and displayed very low levels of depressive symptoms (as indicated by a score less than 5 on the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale; M = 1.5 symptoms; SD = 1.7) [34]. We have reported elsewhere that individuals who did not complete the LAQ at baseline tended to be older, reported poorer health, and demonstrated lower cognitive performance (as measured by the MMSE and WRAT-4) (P’s < 0.05). There were no differences in educational attainment between those who completed and those who did not complete the LAQ measure at baseline [35].Table 1
Demographic characteristics of sample.
%
M
SD
Age (years)
67.49
5.95
Education (years)
13.85
2.94
Elementary school (K-8)
2.3
High school/equivalent (9–12)
40.2
College (13–16)
41.2
Postgraduate
13.1
Other
1.1
Income (past 12 months)
Less than $5,000
6.1
$5,000–14,999
23.1
S15,000–34,999
35.2
$35,000–74,999
27.4
$75,000 or greater
6.8
Sex
Male
15.4
Female
84.6
Race
African American
90.5
European American
5.1


### 2.2. Measures

#### 2.2.1. Education

Educational attainment was defined as the self-reported number of years of formal education completed.


#### 2.2.2. Activity

Frequency of participation in a wide range of activities was assessed via the Lifestyle Activities Questionnaire [16]. Participants rated their typical frequency of participation in various daily activities (e.g., cooking, singing, gardening, listening to music, reading) over the past year. Responses were made on a 6-point scale (never/less often than once a month, once a month, 2 to 3 times a month, once a week, a few times a week, and every day).For analyses, we classified lifestyle activities into five activity domains to examine the effects of participation in specific types of activity on education-cognition relations (Table2; also see Parisi et al. [35] for detailed information on activity items and domains). These activity domains were theoretically based on a comprehensive review of the existing literature [10, 12, 14, 16, 22, 36, 37] and have been used in our previous research [35]. Specifically, individual activity items were classified intointellectual (6 items: reading a book, reading a newspaper, balancing checkbook, using a computer, crossword puzzles, taking courses/classes), social (7 items: discussing local or national issues, visiting, clubs/organizations, attending church/religious service, playing cards/games, going to movies, going to plays/concerts), physical(3 items: shopping, gardening, hunting/fishing/camping), creative (4 items: singing, playing an instrument, cooking, drawing or painting, sewing/mending/fixing things), and passive (4 items: watching TV, listening to music, listening to the radio (not music), looking at art) activity domains (Table 2). The frequency of participation was calculated within each activity domain by averaging frequency responses to individual activity items, with lower numbers reflecting less participation.Table 2
Activity domains from the lifestyle activities questionnaire.
Activities
Percentage of individuals reporting activity
M
SD
Intellectual
Reading a book
88.7
3.1
l.8
Reading a newspaper
87.7
3.6
1.7
Balancing checkbook
82.6
2.0
1.5
Using a computer
57.0
2.2
2.2
Crossword puzzles
49.0
1.6
2.0
Taking courses or classes
25.7
0.6
1.2
Social
Discussing local or national issues
96.0
3.9
1.3
Attending church religious service
91.3
3.0
1.3
Visiting
87.2
2.3
1.4
Clubs/organizations
78.6
2.2
1.6
Playing cards or games
49.4
1.2
1.5
Going to movies
33.9
0.5
0.9
Going to plays concerts
33.5
0.4
0.7
Physical
Shopping
98.8
3.3
1.0
Gardening
46.9
1.5
l.8
Hunting, Fishing, Camping
3.7
0.1
0.3
Creative
Preparing food
97.6
4.2
1.1
Sewing, mending, fixing things
78.2
2.2
1.6
Singing, playing instrument
66.6
2.5
2.0
Drawing or Painting
21.0
0.5
1.1
Passive
Watching TV
99.1
4.8
0.6
Listening to music
99.1
4.6
0.9
Listening to radio (not music)
89.3
3.8
1.6
Looking at art
58.9
1.4
1.6
Note: Averages based on 6-point scale; 1 = never, 6 = everyday.


#### 2.2.3. Cognition

Measures were selected to assess global cognitive status (MMSE) [32] and several distinct cognitive processes, such as reading ability, processing speed, and memory performance. Reading ability was assessed using the reading subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test, version 4 (WRAT-4) [33]. To complete this test, participants are asked to read aloud a list of 15 letters and 55 words increasing in difficulty level (from cat to terpsichorean). Higher scores reflect a greater number of correctly pronounced words.Processing speed was assessed by the pattern comparison task [38] in which participants are asked to make “same” or “different” judgments as quickly as possible (for 30 seconds) for sequences of pairs of patterns. Higher scores reflect a greater number of correct responses. Memory performance was assessed by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) [39, 40], capturing both immediate and delayed recall. Using a word-list learning paradigm, participants are first presented with a 15-word list (List A) and asked to recall the list (this process is repeated for five trials). Next, participants are presented with one trial of a second 15-word list (List B; interference) and asked to recall the list. Finally, participants are asked to recall the words on the initial list (List A) after a 20-minute delay (delayed recall trial). For scoring, immediate recall reflects the sum of words recalled on trials 1 to 5 (on List A) and delayed recall reflects total number of words recalled after a 20-minute delay. For each of these outcome measures, higher scores reflect greater memory ability.


#### 2.2.4. Covariates

Final models adjusted for demographics (e.g., age, sex, ethnicity/race), household income (for the past 12 months), self-reported health status (5-point scale; 1 = poor to 5 = excellent), and depressive symptoms as measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale (15-item) [34].


### 2.3. Data Analysis

Multiple mediation models were applied to determine the following: (1) whether frequent participation in a wide range of lifestyle activities could partially explain the relationship between education and cognition, or (2) whether the relationship between education and cognition could be better explained by participation in specific activity domains (see Figure1) [41, 42]. As we were interested in exploring the relative contributions of education and activities on distinct cognitive abilities, multiple mediation models were conducted separately for each cognitive outcome (e.g., reading ability, processing speed, memory; Figure 1). Analyses were conducted with IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 19 (see http://www.quantpsy.org/ for the SPSS macro command set for multiple mediation) [42].Following the procedures defined by Preacher and Hayes [42], we examined both the totaland specific indirect effects using 5,000 bootstrap samples to calculate the 95% bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap confidence intervals (CI). These nonparametric bootstrapping techniques are often considered more statistically robust than traditional approaches (e.g., Sobel test, causal steps approach) because they do not assume normality in the sampling distribution [42–45]. The total indirect effect explains the combined contribution of activity domains (intellectual, social, physical, creative, passive) on education-cognition relations; whereas, the specificindirect effect tests the uniquecontribution of each activity domain, above and beyond participation in other domains. Point estimates were considered significant when zero was not included in the confidence interval.


## 2.1. Sample

For purposes of the present analyses, individuals were included (n
=
675) if they completed the Lifestyle Activities Questionnaire (LAQ) [16] and cognitive measures as part of the baseline assessment. Participants were, on average, 67 years of age (SD = 5.95, range = 60–89 years), had 13.9 years of education (SD = 2.94, range = 6–22 years), and were predominantly female (84.6%) and African American (90.5%) (Table 1). In addition, participants reported their current health as excellent, very good, or good (89.1%) and displayed very low levels of depressive symptoms (as indicated by a score less than 5 on the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale; M = 1.5 symptoms; SD = 1.7) [34]. We have reported elsewhere that individuals who did not complete the LAQ at baseline tended to be older, reported poorer health, and demonstrated lower cognitive performance (as measured by the MMSE and WRAT-4) (P’s < 0.05). There were no differences in educational attainment between those who completed and those who did not complete the LAQ measure at baseline [35].Table 1
Demographic characteristics of sample.
%
M
SD
Age (years)
67.49
5.95
Education (years)
13.85
2.94
Elementary school (K-8)
2.3
High school/equivalent (9–12)
40.2
College (13–16)
41.2
Postgraduate
13.1
Other
1.1
Income (past 12 months)
Less than $5,000
6.1
$5,000–14,999
23.1
S15,000–34,999
35.2
$35,000–74,999
27.4
$75,000 or greater
6.8
Sex
Male
15.4
Female
84.6
Race
African American
90.5
European American
5.1


## 2.2. Measures

### 2.2.1. Education

Educational attainment was defined as the self-reported number of years of formal education completed.


### 2.2.2. Activity

Frequency of participation in a wide range of activities was assessed via the Lifestyle Activities Questionnaire [16]. Participants rated their typical frequency of participation in various daily activities (e.g., cooking, singing, gardening, listening to music, reading) over the past year. Responses were made on a 6-point scale (never/less often than once a month, once a month, 2 to 3 times a month, once a week, a few times a week, and every day).For analyses, we classified lifestyle activities into five activity domains to examine the effects of participation in specific types of activity on education-cognition relations (Table2; also see Parisi et al. [35] for detailed information on activity items and domains). These activity domains were theoretically based on a comprehensive review of the existing literature [10, 12, 14, 16, 22, 36, 37] and have been used in our previous research [35]. Specifically, individual activity items were classified intointellectual (6 items: reading a book, reading a newspaper, balancing checkbook, using a computer, crossword puzzles, taking courses/classes), social (7 items: discussing local or national issues, visiting, clubs/organizations, attending church/religious service, playing cards/games, going to movies, going to plays/concerts), physical(3 items: shopping, gardening, hunting/fishing/camping), creative (4 items: singing, playing an instrument, cooking, drawing or painting, sewing/mending/fixing things), and passive (4 items: watching TV, listening to music, listening to the radio (not music), looking at art) activity domains (Table 2). The frequency of participation was calculated within each activity domain by averaging frequency responses to individual activity items, with lower numbers reflecting less participation.Table 2
Activity domains from the lifestyle activities questionnaire.
Activities
Percentage of individuals reporting activity
M
SD
Intellectual
Reading a book
88.7
3.1
l.8
Reading a newspaper
87.7
3.6
1.7
Balancing checkbook
82.6
2.0
1.5
Using a computer
57.0
2.2
2.2
Crossword puzzles
49.0
1.6
2.0
Taking courses or classes
25.7
0.6
1.2
Social
Discussing local or national issues
96.0
3.9
1.3
Attending church religious service
91.3
3.0
1.3
Visiting
87.2
2.3
1.4
Clubs/organizations
78.6
2.2
1.6
Playing cards or games
49.4
1.2
1.5
Going to movies
33.9
0.5
0.9
Going to plays concerts
33.5
0.4
0.7
Physical
Shopping
98.8
3.3
1.0
Gardening
46.9
1.5
l.8
Hunting, Fishing, Camping
3.7
0.1
0.3
Creative
Preparing food
97.6
4.2
1.1
Sewing, mending, fixing things
78.2
2.2
1.6
Singing, playing instrument
66.6
2.5
2.0
Drawing or Painting
21.0
0.5
1.1
Passive
Watching TV
99.1
4.8
0.6
Listening to music
99.1
4.6
0.9
Listening to radio (not music)
89.3
3.8
1.6
Looking at art
58.9
1.4
1.6
Note: Averages based on 6-point scale; 1 = never, 6 = everyday.


### 2.2.3. Cognition

Measures were selected to assess global cognitive status (MMSE) [32] and several distinct cognitive processes, such as reading ability, processing speed, and memory performance. Reading ability was assessed using the reading subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test, version 4 (WRAT-4) [33]. To complete this test, participants are asked to read aloud a list of 15 letters and 55 words increasing in difficulty level (from cat to terpsichorean). Higher scores reflect a greater number of correctly pronounced words.Processing speed was assessed by the pattern comparison task [38] in which participants are asked to make “same” or “different” judgments as quickly as possible (for 30 seconds) for sequences of pairs of patterns. Higher scores reflect a greater number of correct responses. Memory performance was assessed by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) [39, 40], capturing both immediate and delayed recall. Using a word-list learning paradigm, participants are first presented with a 15-word list (List A) and asked to recall the list (this process is repeated for five trials). Next, participants are presented with one trial of a second 15-word list (List B; interference) and asked to recall the list. Finally, participants are asked to recall the words on the initial list (List A) after a 20-minute delay (delayed recall trial). For scoring, immediate recall reflects the sum of words recalled on trials 1 to 5 (on List A) and delayed recall reflects total number of words recalled after a 20-minute delay. For each of these outcome measures, higher scores reflect greater memory ability.


### 2.2.4. Covariates

Final models adjusted for demographics (e.g., age, sex, ethnicity/race), household income (for the past 12 months), self-reported health status (5-point scale; 1 = poor to 5 = excellent), and depressive symptoms as measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale (15-item) [34].


## 2.2.1. Education

Educational attainment was defined as the self-reported number of years of formal education completed.


## 2.2.2. Activity

Frequency of participation in a wide range of activities was assessed via the Lifestyle Activities Questionnaire [16]. Participants rated their typical frequency of participation in various daily activities (e.g., cooking, singing, gardening, listening to music, reading) over the past year. Responses were made on a 6-point scale (never/less often than once a month, once a month, 2 to 3 times a month, once a week, a few times a week, and every day).For analyses, we classified lifestyle activities into five activity domains to examine the effects of participation in specific types of activity on education-cognition relations (Table2; also see Parisi et al. [35] for detailed information on activity items and domains). These activity domains were theoretically based on a comprehensive review of the existing literature [10, 12, 14, 16, 22, 36, 37] and have been used in our previous research [35]. Specifically, individual activity items were classified intointellectual (6 items: reading a book, reading a newspaper, balancing checkbook, using a computer, crossword puzzles, taking courses/classes), social (7 items: discussing local or national issues, visiting, clubs/organizations, attending church/religious service, playing cards/games, going to movies, going to plays/concerts), physical(3 items: shopping, gardening, hunting/fishing/camping), creative (4 items: singing, playing an instrument, cooking, drawing or painting, sewing/mending/fixing things), and passive (4 items: watching TV, listening to music, listening to the radio (not music), looking at art) activity domains (Table 2). The frequency of participation was calculated within each activity domain by averaging frequency responses to individual activity items, with lower numbers reflecting less participation.Table 2
Activity domains from the lifestyle activities questionnaire.
Activities
Percentage of individuals reporting activity
M
SD
Intellectual
Reading a book
88.7
3.1
l.8
Reading a newspaper
87.7
3.6
1.7
Balancing checkbook
82.6
2.0
1.5
Using a computer
57.0
2.2
2.2
Crossword puzzles
49.0
1.6
2.0
Taking courses or classes
25.7
0.6
1.2
Social
Discussing local or national issues
96.0
3.9
1.3
Attending church religious service
91.3
3.0
1.3
Visiting
87.2
2.3
1.4
Clubs/organizations
78.6
2.2
1.6
Playing cards or games
49.4
1.2
1.5
Going to movies
33.9
0.5
0.9
Going to plays concerts
33.5
0.4
0.7
Physical
Shopping
98.8
3.3
1.0
Gardening
46.9
1.5
l.8
Hunting, Fishing, Camping
3.7
0.1
0.3
Creative
Preparing food
97.6
4.2
1.1
Sewing, mending, fixing things
78.2
2.2
1.6
Singing, playing instrument
66.6
2.5
2.0
Drawing or Painting
21.0
0.5
1.1
Passive
Watching TV
99.1
4.8
0.6
Listening to music
99.1
4.6
0.9
Listening to radio (not music)
89.3
3.8
1.6
Looking at art
58.9
1.4
1.6
Note: Averages based on 6-point scale; 1 = never, 6 = everyday.


## 2.2.3. Cognition

Measures were selected to assess global cognitive status (MMSE) [32] and several distinct cognitive processes, such as reading ability, processing speed, and memory performance. Reading ability was assessed using the reading subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test, version 4 (WRAT-4) [33]. To complete this test, participants are asked to read aloud a list of 15 letters and 55 words increasing in difficulty level (from cat to terpsichorean). Higher scores reflect a greater number of correctly pronounced words.Processing speed was assessed by the pattern comparison task [38] in which participants are asked to make “same” or “different” judgments as quickly as possible (for 30 seconds) for sequences of pairs of patterns. Higher scores reflect a greater number of correct responses. Memory performance was assessed by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) [39, 40], capturing both immediate and delayed recall. Using a word-list learning paradigm, participants are first presented with a 15-word list (List A) and asked to recall the list (this process is repeated for five trials). Next, participants are presented with one trial of a second 15-word list (List B; interference) and asked to recall the list. Finally, participants are asked to recall the words on the initial list (List A) after a 20-minute delay (delayed recall trial). For scoring, immediate recall reflects the sum of words recalled on trials 1 to 5 (on List A) and delayed recall reflects total number of words recalled after a 20-minute delay. For each of these outcome measures, higher scores reflect greater memory ability.


## 2.2.4. Covariates

Final models adjusted for demographics (e.g., age, sex, ethnicity/race), household income (for the past 12 months), self-reported health status (5-point scale; 1 = poor to 5 = excellent), and depressive symptoms as measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale (15-item) [34].


## 2.3. Data Analysis

Multiple mediation models were applied to determine the following: (1) whether frequent participation in a wide range of lifestyle activities could partially explain the relationship between education and cognition, or (2) whether the relationship between education and cognition could be better explained by participation in specific activity domains (see Figure1) [41, 42]. As we were interested in exploring the relative contributions of education and activities on distinct cognitive abilities, multiple mediation models were conducted separately for each cognitive outcome (e.g., reading ability, processing speed, memory; Figure 1). Analyses were conducted with IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 19 (see http://www.quantpsy.org/ for the SPSS macro command set for multiple mediation) [42].Following the procedures defined by Preacher and Hayes [42], we examined both the totaland specific indirect effects using 5,000 bootstrap samples to calculate the 95% bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap confidence intervals (CI). These nonparametric bootstrapping techniques are often considered more statistically robust than traditional approaches (e.g., Sobel test, causal steps approach) because they do not assume normality in the sampling distribution [42–45]. The total indirect effect explains the combined contribution of activity domains (intellectual, social, physical, creative, passive) on education-cognition relations; whereas, the specificindirect effect tests the uniquecontribution of each activity domain, above and beyond participation in other domains. Point estimates were considered significant when zero was not included in the confidence interval.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Correlations

As expected, greater educational attainment was related to better performance on cognitive measures (ranging fromr
=
0.09 for processing speed to r
=
0.46 for reading ability), as well as with overall frequency of activity (r
=
0.14) (Table 3). Educational attainment was also related to greater participation in intellectual and physical activities (r
=
0.26 and 0.14, resp.). Additionally, greater participation in intellectual activities was consistently associated with performance on cognitive tasks (ranging from r
=
0.11 for delayed memory recall to r
=
0.22 for reading ability).Table 3
Unadjusted correlations among education, activity, and cognition.
Cognition
Education
MMSE
WRAT-4
Speed
Memory: immediate
Memory: delayed
Education
1.00
0.17**
0.46**
0.09*
0.10**
0.11**
Activity level
Frequency, overall
0.14**
0.08*
0.05
0.15**
0.12**
0.10*
Activity type
Intellectual
0.26**
0.12**
0.22**
0.16**
0.14**
0.11**
Social
−0.04
−0.01
−0.13**
0.08*
0.05
0.03
Physical
0.14**
−0.03
0.08*
0.04
0.04
0.01
Creative
0.01
0.02
−0.06
0.06
0.12**
0.10*
Passive
0.07
−0.02
−0.02
0.03
−0.01
−0.01
Note:P
*
<
0.05. P
*
*
<
0.01. MMSE: Mini-Mental State Exam; WRAT: Wide Range Achievement Test-4.


### 3.2. Multiple Mediation Models

The results from the bootstrapping analyses showed that the total indirect effect (i.e., aggregate effect of participation across the five activity domains) was significant for the measures of global cognition (point estimate = 0.120; CI.95 = 0.000, 0.025), reading ability (point estimate = 0.062; CI.95 = 0.014, 0.120), and processing speed (point estimate = 0.075; CI.95 = 0.033, 0.131) (Table 4). It is important to note that in each of these models, education-cognition relations were not completely eliminated (i.e., the association between education on cognition remained significant). These findings indicate that, taken as a set, frequent participation in a wide range of lifestyle activities partially accounts for the effects of education on these cognitive abilities. Further inspection of the specific indirect effects (e.g., a
1
b
1 versus a
2
b
2 in Figure 1) indicated that this effect only held true for intellectually challenging activities (point estimate = 0.014; CI.95 = 0.000, 0.025 for global cognition; point estimate = 0.070; CI.95 = 0.027, 0.125 for reading ability; point estimate = 0.078; CI.95 = 0.040, 0.134 for processing speed; Table 4), controlling for all other activity domains. Thus, these findings suggest that greater participation in social, physical, creative, or passive activity did not contribute to the total indirect effect above and beyond participation in intellectual activity for measures of global cognition, reading ability, and processing speed. We did not find similar associations (neither the total nor specific indirect effects were significant) for the AVLT immediate or delayed memory task.Table 4
Indirect effects of education on cognition through activity.
BCa 95% Cl
Indirect effects
Estimate
SE
Lower
Upper
MMSE
Total
.012
.006
.000
.025
Intellectual
.014
.006
.003
.027
Social
.000
.001
−.003
.003
Physical
−.002
.002
−.008
.002
Creative
−.001
.001
−.005
.001
Passive
−.001
.002
−.006
.001
WRAT-4
Total
.062
.027
.014
.120
Intellectual
.070
.024
.027
.125
Social
.000
.004
−.010
.009
Physical
.003
.009
−.011
.027
Creative
−.004
.008
−.029
.005
Passive
−.007
.009
−.033
.004
Processing speed
Total
.075
.025
.033
.131
Intellectual
.078
.024
.040
.134
Social
.000
.004
−.007
.007
Physical
.001
.008
−.016
.018
Creative
.001
.004
−.007
.012
Passive
−.004
.007
−.025
.003
Memory: immediate recall
Total
.043
.033
−.015
.112
Intellectual
.050
.031
−.004
.119
Social
.002
.005
−.009
.012
Physical
−.004
.012
−.033
.017
Creative
.004
.010
−.006
.036
Passive
−.008
.010
−.041
.004
Memory: delayed recall
Total
.005
.012
−.017
.030
Intellectual
.010
.012
−.012
.034
Social
.000
.002
−.005
.004
Physical
−.005
.005
−.018
.002
Creative
.001
.003
−.002
.012
Passive
−.001
.003
−.012
.002
Note: IV: independent variable (education, in years); DV: dependent variable (cognitive outcomes); BCa 95% Cl: bias-corrected and accelerated confidence intervals. Total indirect effect represents the sum of the indirect effects for specific activity pathways. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race, household income (past 12 months), health, and depression.


## 3.1. Correlations

As expected, greater educational attainment was related to better performance on cognitive measures (ranging fromr
=
0.09 for processing speed to r
=
0.46 for reading ability), as well as with overall frequency of activity (r
=
0.14) (Table 3). Educational attainment was also related to greater participation in intellectual and physical activities (r
=
0.26 and 0.14, resp.). Additionally, greater participation in intellectual activities was consistently associated with performance on cognitive tasks (ranging from r
=
0.11 for delayed memory recall to r
=
0.22 for reading ability).Table 3
Unadjusted correlations among education, activity, and cognition.
Cognition
Education
MMSE
WRAT-4
Speed
Memory: immediate
Memory: delayed
Education
1.00
0.17**
0.46**
0.09*
0.10**
0.11**
Activity level
Frequency, overall
0.14**
0.08*
0.05
0.15**
0.12**
0.10*
Activity type
Intellectual
0.26**
0.12**
0.22**
0.16**
0.14**
0.11**
Social
−0.04
−0.01
−0.13**
0.08*
0.05
0.03
Physical
0.14**
−0.03
0.08*
0.04
0.04
0.01
Creative
0.01
0.02
−0.06
0.06
0.12**
0.10*
Passive
0.07
−0.02
−0.02
0.03
−0.01
−0.01
Note:P
*
<
0.05. P
*
*
<
0.01. MMSE: Mini-Mental State Exam; WRAT: Wide Range Achievement Test-4.


## 3.2. Multiple Mediation Models

The results from the bootstrapping analyses showed that the total indirect effect (i.e., aggregate effect of participation across the five activity domains) was significant for the measures of global cognition (point estimate = 0.120; CI.95 = 0.000, 0.025), reading ability (point estimate = 0.062; CI.95 = 0.014, 0.120), and processing speed (point estimate = 0.075; CI.95 = 0.033, 0.131) (Table 4). It is important to note that in each of these models, education-cognition relations were not completely eliminated (i.e., the association between education on cognition remained significant). These findings indicate that, taken as a set, frequent participation in a wide range of lifestyle activities partially accounts for the effects of education on these cognitive abilities. Further inspection of the specific indirect effects (e.g., a
1
b
1 versus a
2
b
2 in Figure 1) indicated that this effect only held true for intellectually challenging activities (point estimate = 0.014; CI.95 = 0.000, 0.025 for global cognition; point estimate = 0.070; CI.95 = 0.027, 0.125 for reading ability; point estimate = 0.078; CI.95 = 0.040, 0.134 for processing speed; Table 4), controlling for all other activity domains. Thus, these findings suggest that greater participation in social, physical, creative, or passive activity did not contribute to the total indirect effect above and beyond participation in intellectual activity for measures of global cognition, reading ability, and processing speed. We did not find similar associations (neither the total nor specific indirect effects were significant) for the AVLT immediate or delayed memory task.Table 4
Indirect effects of education on cognition through activity.
BCa 95% Cl
Indirect effects
Estimate
SE
Lower
Upper
MMSE
Total
.012
.006
.000
.025
Intellectual
.014
.006
.003
.027
Social
.000
.001
−.003
.003
Physical
−.002
.002
−.008
.002
Creative
−.001
.001
−.005
.001
Passive
−.001
.002
−.006
.001
WRAT-4
Total
.062
.027
.014
.120
Intellectual
.070
.024
.027
.125
Social
.000
.004
−.010
.009
Physical
.003
.009
−.011
.027
Creative
−.004
.008
−.029
.005
Passive
−.007
.009
−.033
.004
Processing speed
Total
.075
.025
.033
.131
Intellectual
.078
.024
.040
.134
Social
.000
.004
−.007
.007
Physical
.001
.008
−.016
.018
Creative
.001
.004
−.007
.012
Passive
−.004
.007
−.025
.003
Memory: immediate recall
Total
.043
.033
−.015
.112
Intellectual
.050
.031
−.004
.119
Social
.002
.005
−.009
.012
Physical
−.004
.012
−.033
.017
Creative
.004
.010
−.006
.036
Passive
−.008
.010
−.041
.004
Memory: delayed recall
Total
.005
.012
−.017
.030
Intellectual
.010
.012
−.012
.034
Social
.000
.002
−.005
.004
Physical
−.005
.005
−.018
.002
Creative
.001
.003
−.002
.012
Passive
−.001
.003
−.012
.002
Note: IV: independent variable (education, in years); DV: dependent variable (cognitive outcomes); BCa 95% Cl: bias-corrected and accelerated confidence intervals. Total indirect effect represents the sum of the indirect effects for specific activity pathways. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race, household income (past 12 months), health, and depression.


## 4. Discussion

The goal of the present study was to examine whether participation in a wide range of activities (intellectual, social, physical, creative, and passive) could account for the relationship between education and cognition in adulthood. Generally, our findings suggest that education-cognition relations can be partially explained by frequent participation in intellectual demanding activities [19, 29, 46].As suggested earlier, educational experiences may provide the necessary knowledge, understanding, skills, and competencies for establishing a lifetime of participation in cognitive challenges. In fact, individuals with higher levels of educational attainment tend to allocate more time and put forth more effort when engaging in intellectually complex activities [47]. As a result, the accumulated exposure to cognitively charged environments may have a direct beneficial effect on brain structure and function, resulting in greater neurological development (e.g., increase in synaptic density) or more efficient use of existing brain networks [48–50]. In addition to such neuroprotective effects, continued practice of cognitive skills may develop compensatory strategies to help maintain cognition in the face of age-related declines [51] or may bolster perceptions of confidence and competence in one’s skills and abilities, potentially leading to more frequent engagement in cognitively demanding environments [36, 52].It is important to mention, however, that the association between education and cognition was not completely eliminated by participation in intellectually demanding activities, suggesting that both educational attainment and intellectual endeavors may independently benefit late-life cognitive performance [29]. In other words, although education may provide a foundation for continued engagement in intellectually demanding environments across the life course, it is also the “choices we make, not chance, that determines our fate” [53].The few studies that have previously investigated these hypothesized pathways have yielded mixed findings. Similar to our findings, Kleigel and colleagues [29] also demonstrated the importance of both education and intellectual stimulation for cognitive performance among the oldest old. A more recent study by Soubelet [54], however, failed to find such associations. The discrepancies may be attributable, in part, to differences in the selected sample, exclusively among centenarians (M = 100.21 years; SD = 0.40) [29] or across a large range of ages (18–96 years) [54]. Further, the definition of intellectual activity differed across studies, potentially impacting the significance of findings. For instance, some of the intellectual activities used in the study by Soubelet [54] were included in our social domain (e.g., theater, cinema, religious participation), for which we did not find significant associations. It should also be noted that the few reports examining whether education-cognition associations could be explained by intellectual activities did not simultaneously consider participation in other forms of engagement. In fact, there is very little work that has examined the relations between education and the types of lifestyle activities that were measured in the current study. The application of multiple mediation models allowed us to test the effects of participation in a wide range of activities (total indirect effect), as well as independent associations with specific activity domains (specific indirect effect), on cognitive performance. To our knowledge, no other study has explored whether participation in various forms of activity can potentially explain the association between education and cognition.Although our findings contribute to the relatively few studies that have examined education-cognition pathways, several limitations need to be addressed. First and foremost, as our data were cross-sectional, we were unable to distinguish whether variation in cognition resulted from age-related decline or from earlier life experiences. We also were unable to establish temporal precedence between activity and cognition. As such, it is also likely that cognitive ability could lead to greater activity [23, 55], rather than activity driving cognition as suggested in the current study. With this said, while correlation does not imply causation, establishing covariation among variables is a necessary (albeit insufficient) condition for causality. In the literature, several questions regarding the determinants and effects of an active lifestyle have yet to be answered [15]. Even though we cannot draw causal assumptions from cross-sectional data, our correlational findings help define what causal models are plausible. More longitudinal investigations are needed to test these competing models, as well as to determine how engaging in cognitively complex challenges across different periods of the lifespan impacts cognition in adulthood [21, 56].We also acknowledge that investigating these associations within the context of a school-based, intensive volunteer program attracted a relatively healthy, active group of volunteers potentially limits the generalizability of our findings to other populations. However, individuals included in this study reported a high prevalence of chronic health conditions (e.g., diabetes, stroke, hypertension, and vascular disease) and comorbidity, placing them at a disproportionately greater risk for cognitive and physical impairments [57]. We also recognize that the number of years of education does not directly translate to the qualityof these educational experiences [58, 59]. This is especially salient given that many of the individuals enrolled in the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial were educated prior to desegregation, a time when the quality of and access to education was not equal for African Americans.Lastly, our measure of activity (LAQ) was developed to capture participation in a broad range of lifestyle activities (e.g., cognitive, social, physical), with a limited number of items reflecting each activity domain. This is especially true for physical activities, which have demonstrated associations with both education and cognition in prior research [48]. However, these neurobiological findings have not translated as well to epidemiologic studies of dementia risk, where self-reported frequency of physical activity is the standard [60, 61]. For instance, Wang and colleagues [62] did not observe an association between physical activity and dementia incidence after accounting for participation in social, cognitive, and productive activities. Nonetheless, findings may have differed if more extensive activity measures were implemented. Further, education and lifestyle activities are not the only forms of experiential richness. For instance, occupational complexity has been consistently linked to cognition in later life [56, 63]. Moreover, occupational status is often associated with other factors (e.g., finances, time) that may impact selection and participation in activities over the life course [64]. Unfortunately, we did not have a reliable measure of occupational history or complexity and were unable to explore these relations in our dataset.Consistent with the engagement hypothesis [3, 10], remaining actively engaged in activities may provide a protective mechanism against cognitive decline and dementia in later life. Although there was some evidence that education-cognition relations could be partially explained by greater participation in intellectual activities, both education and activities uniquely contributed to cognition in adulthood. As such, interventions such as the Experience Corps program which promote broad-based engagement may help older adults maintain, or potentially enhance, cognitive function. Further research is recommended to replicate these important findings with similar activities in varied populations.



---

*Source: 416132-2012-08-09.xml*