# An Experimental Investigation of Karanja Biodiesel Production in Sarawak, Malaysia

Authors: Dewi Harreh; A. A. Saleh; A. N. R. Reddy; S. Hamdan
Journal: Journal of Engineering
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

The application of nonedible feedstock for the production of biodiesel has become an area of research interest among clean energy experts in the past few years. This research is aimed at the utilization ofPongamia pinnata (karanja), a nonedible feedstock from the state of Sarawak, Malaysia, to produce biodiesel to be known as crude karanja oil (CKO). A one-step transesterification process utilizing 7 : 1–10 : 1 wt% methanol (CH3OH) and 0.5–1.2 wt% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at 65°C for 1.5 hrs has been used for the biodiesel production yielding 84% conversion. The physiochemical properties of the CKO produced revealed that it conforms with EN14214 standards for brake power (BP), brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC), and brake thermal efficiency (BTE) as they are all noted be optimal at B40.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The diesel engine vehicles are well known as one of the largest contributors to air pollution that produce routine hazardous emissions within cities and along urban traffic routes caused by exhaust emissions [1, 2]. With rapid industrialization and exponential growth of the transport sector, environmental pollution along with global warming that arise in the developing countries faces major challenges of the energy demand as well as increased environmental concerns. Impact of health problems caused by emitted of toxic air and how it is distributed within a city is crucial for sustainable development. Therefore, it has become very essential to explore a renewable energy source that will serve as an alternative fuel that will replace the consumption of petroleum fuels and reduce toxic emissions. Due to the increase in human population and awareness about climate change, attempts have been made to utilize crude karanja oil (CKO) as a feedstock for biodiesel production so as to replace costly and scarce petroleum fuels [3].Biodiesel has been identified as a cost-effective energy source with less harmful emission and readily availability to be use as substitute fuel in the internal combustion (CI) engines. The chemical name for biodiesel is fatty acid methyl ester (FAME). It has been recognized globally around the world and is continuously been identified for its environmental friendliness and an alternative renewable energy source [4, 5]. Recently, serious efforts are in progress by several researchers to operate CI engines using oil that is made from plant oil and its esters (biodiesel).The theory of using vegetable oils as substitute for diesel engine is over a past decade. In 1910, Dr. Rudolf Diesel was the first researcher to invent a compression ignition (CI) engine using peanut oil [5]. He observed that vegetable oils are not suitable for use directly as diesel engine oil due to their high viscosity and incomplete combustion that triggers higher smoke density when compared to fossil fuel which leads to poor fuel atomization [6]. This phenomenon has been identified as potential cause of engine failure such as sticking in ring piston, choking of injectors, and formation of carbon deposits [7]. In order to minimize these problems, techniques such as oxidation process, pyrolysis, dilution, microemulsion, and transesterification have been used for production of biodiesel [5, 8]. Among all these techniques, transesterification is the most viable and effective [9]. Biodiesel production from vegetable oils has given rise to debate of “food” versus “fuel” demand. Consequently, the demand for vegetable oil for biodiesel production has led to increase in price of the commodity due to its high consumption as food. Hence, the quest for alternative to edible oil for biodiesel production has given rise to use nonedible oils such as CKO. It has been identified as more sustainable and promising biodiesel feedstock when compared to edible oils [10].Karanja tree also known asPongamia pinnata,belongs to the family of Leguminosae.It is an evergreen tree in medium-size, with an average height of between 12–15 m [11, 12]. It is normally planted along the highways for landscaping purpose because of its large canopy and showy fragrant flowers. Its roots and canals are equally useful for prevention of soil erosion. Similarly, karanja tree is highly tolerant to high salinity conditions and can be grown on most soil textures ranging from stony to sandy to clayey [9, 10]. Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, East Indies, Philippines, and India are tropical and temperate Asia which offers ideal climate condition for karanja growth. In recent times, this tree has been introduced in United States and Egypt [13, 14]. Karanja is a fast-growing tree in which its fruits get mature within 4–7 years after planting. Karanja seeds are elliptical in shape and flat pods with size 3–6 cm long and 2-3 cm wide [15]. The reddish brown of karanja fruit contains 1-2 kernels that exactly look like of the human kidney shape. The karanja seed kernel is claimed to have 30%–40% of oil content. The main constraints of this oil are its dark brown colour, bitter test, and disagreeable odour [11]. Karanja oil can yield 900 to 9000 kg per hectare. It is one of potential oils with production of 13500 million tonnes per annum but only 6% is being utilized [16]. According to Karmee et al., karanja oil emits less amount of harmful substances and inexpensive as compared to jatropha oil [14].The main objective of this current research is to study the production of Karanja methyl ester (KME) using locally available karanja seed feedstock as a renewable fuel. A laboratory scale experimental set-up has been established to produce the crude karanja seed oil. Base catalyzed transesterification protocol has been followed for production of KME. The biofuel properties are characterized according to EN 14214 biodiesel standards. Besides, the efficiency of a diesel engine fueled KME blends has been performed to ascertain its suitability as an alternative fuel source.


## 2. Material and Method

### 2.1. Material

Karanja(Pongamia pinnata) seeds have been collected from karanja tree within Universiti Malaysia Sarawak campus (UNIMAS), Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia. Healthy karanja seeds have been identified after thorough inspection and separated from damaged seeds. The healthy seeds are deshelled, cleaned from dust, and dried in convection oven for moisture removal whereas damage seeds were discarded. Oil is extracted from the seeds using laboratory scaled chemicals such as methanol CH3OH, (>99% pure), H2SO4 (95–97% pure), distilled water, and sodium hydroxide, NaOH.


### 2.2. Extraction of Crude Karanja Oil

CKO was extracted using Soxhlet apparatus and mechanical expeller. Soxhlet extraction method has been selected so as to achieve the best result during extraction while hexane has been used as solvent. Hexane has been continuously refluxed until the colour of the hexane in the thimble is very clear. This process requires a longer period of time and only few amounts of oil recovered as compared to other technique [17, 18]. The extracted CKO has been filtered and heated to eliminate solid impurities. After filtration process, the CKO then heated up to 120°C to remove any water content in the oil. Finally, the pretreated CKO has been stored in the 500 mL beaker sealed with aluminium foil. The stepwise extraction of CKO is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Crude karanja oil extraction process.


### 2.3. Measurement of Free Fatty Acid

Free Fatty Acid (FFAs) content in the CKO has been determined using standard titrimetric methods. It has been reported that the amount of potassium hydroxide, KOH, that requires neutralizing the fatty acid contained in CKO is 1 mg of FAME [17–19]. According to Azhari et al. [19], high amount of soap would be produced simultaneously when transesterification reaction of the feedstock contains a high amount of FFA than the required maximum amount of basic homogenous catalyst. Thus, to overcome this reaction, an alternative mechanism can be applied. For example, enzymes, solid resins, homogenous acid catalyst, or supercritical process has been used [20, 21]. Initially, 200 ml beaker has been filled with 15 ml of 95% ethanol and 15 ml of diethyl ether along with 5 drops of phenolphthalein indicator. Afterwards, 40 g of CKO was poured into a conical flask and titrated with KOH solution with continuous stirring until pink colour appear.


### 2.4. Karanja Biodiesel Production

For the second step, base catalyzed transesterification process has been conducted to produce KME. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) has been utilized as a base catalyst. The sodium methoxide solution has been prepared by mixing the different methanol to oil ratio by volume (7 : 1, 8 : 1, 9 : 1, and 10 : 1) with NaOH and stirred at 250 rpm using a magnetic stirrer and heated the contents continuously for 90 min [22]. Afterwards, the reaction mixture has been left to settle overnight so as to separate the mixture into 2 different layers: the upper layer being the methanol-water fraction and the bottom layer being the methyl ester. The mixture has been allowed to settle completely, and the bottom layer containing glycerol is removed. The KME is washed with distilled water to remove impurities such as catalyst and excess methanol [23]. The biodiesel obtained is again heated until 60°C–80°C until it turns clear. Lastly, the biodiesel is kept in a beaker and sealed with aluminium foil to prevent contamination. Sequential of karanja biodiesel production was shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Karanja biodiesel production by transesterification.


### 2.5. Engine Performance Test

The engine performance test has been carried out using Techno-mate, TNM-TDE-700 machine as shown in Figure3. In the study, various combination of blends has been prepared to identify the recommended biodiesel blend. B10 (10% KB + 90% PD), B20 (20% KB + 80% PD), B30 (30% KB + 70% PD), B40 (40% KB + 60% PD), B50 (50% KB + 50% PD), and B100 (100% KB) blends have been prepared and tested using diesel engine to evaluate the engine performance [24]. The performance parameters such as brake power (BP), brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC), and brake thermal efficiency (BTE) have been calculated using the collected test data [24, 25].Figure 3
Diesel Engine Performance Test Bed (Techno-mate, TNM-TDE-700).


## 2.1. Material

Karanja(Pongamia pinnata) seeds have been collected from karanja tree within Universiti Malaysia Sarawak campus (UNIMAS), Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia. Healthy karanja seeds have been identified after thorough inspection and separated from damaged seeds. The healthy seeds are deshelled, cleaned from dust, and dried in convection oven for moisture removal whereas damage seeds were discarded. Oil is extracted from the seeds using laboratory scaled chemicals such as methanol CH3OH, (>99% pure), H2SO4 (95–97% pure), distilled water, and sodium hydroxide, NaOH.


## 2.2. Extraction of Crude Karanja Oil

CKO was extracted using Soxhlet apparatus and mechanical expeller. Soxhlet extraction method has been selected so as to achieve the best result during extraction while hexane has been used as solvent. Hexane has been continuously refluxed until the colour of the hexane in the thimble is very clear. This process requires a longer period of time and only few amounts of oil recovered as compared to other technique [17, 18]. The extracted CKO has been filtered and heated to eliminate solid impurities. After filtration process, the CKO then heated up to 120°C to remove any water content in the oil. Finally, the pretreated CKO has been stored in the 500 mL beaker sealed with aluminium foil. The stepwise extraction of CKO is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Crude karanja oil extraction process.


## 2.3. Measurement of Free Fatty Acid

Free Fatty Acid (FFAs) content in the CKO has been determined using standard titrimetric methods. It has been reported that the amount of potassium hydroxide, KOH, that requires neutralizing the fatty acid contained in CKO is 1 mg of FAME [17–19]. According to Azhari et al. [19], high amount of soap would be produced simultaneously when transesterification reaction of the feedstock contains a high amount of FFA than the required maximum amount of basic homogenous catalyst. Thus, to overcome this reaction, an alternative mechanism can be applied. For example, enzymes, solid resins, homogenous acid catalyst, or supercritical process has been used [20, 21]. Initially, 200 ml beaker has been filled with 15 ml of 95% ethanol and 15 ml of diethyl ether along with 5 drops of phenolphthalein indicator. Afterwards, 40 g of CKO was poured into a conical flask and titrated with KOH solution with continuous stirring until pink colour appear.


## 2.4. Karanja Biodiesel Production

For the second step, base catalyzed transesterification process has been conducted to produce KME. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) has been utilized as a base catalyst. The sodium methoxide solution has been prepared by mixing the different methanol to oil ratio by volume (7 : 1, 8 : 1, 9 : 1, and 10 : 1) with NaOH and stirred at 250 rpm using a magnetic stirrer and heated the contents continuously for 90 min [22]. Afterwards, the reaction mixture has been left to settle overnight so as to separate the mixture into 2 different layers: the upper layer being the methanol-water fraction and the bottom layer being the methyl ester. The mixture has been allowed to settle completely, and the bottom layer containing glycerol is removed. The KME is washed with distilled water to remove impurities such as catalyst and excess methanol [23]. The biodiesel obtained is again heated until 60°C–80°C until it turns clear. Lastly, the biodiesel is kept in a beaker and sealed with aluminium foil to prevent contamination. Sequential of karanja biodiesel production was shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Karanja biodiesel production by transesterification.


## 2.5. Engine Performance Test

The engine performance test has been carried out using Techno-mate, TNM-TDE-700 machine as shown in Figure3. In the study, various combination of blends has been prepared to identify the recommended biodiesel blend. B10 (10% KB + 90% PD), B20 (20% KB + 80% PD), B30 (30% KB + 70% PD), B40 (40% KB + 60% PD), B50 (50% KB + 50% PD), and B100 (100% KB) blends have been prepared and tested using diesel engine to evaluate the engine performance [24]. The performance parameters such as brake power (BP), brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC), and brake thermal efficiency (BTE) have been calculated using the collected test data [24, 25].Figure 3
Diesel Engine Performance Test Bed (Techno-mate, TNM-TDE-700).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Titrimetric Results on Crude Karanja Oil

Table1 shows the measurement of FFA content in CKO is essential in the transesterification process for biodiesel production [26]. Titration is done using 0.1 mol of KOH solution and it has been repeated 3 times to obtain the average value in order to eliminate parallax errors. Karanja oil was found less than 1%. Thus, one-step transesterification has been carried out. From the titration method, the FFA content in CKO has been found to be within the ranges of 0-1%, which is lower 1%. The best conversion method has been one-step transesterification.Table 1
Free Fatty Acid analysis results of crude karanja oil.
Cycle
W (g)
V (ml)
M (mol)
Acid value (%)
First
2.09
2.4
0.1
0.645
Second
2.02
2.39
0.1
0.666
Third
2.3
2.52
0.1
0.615


### 3.2. Effect of Particle Size of the Seeds to Oil Yield Ratio

Variations of the particle size occur during size reduction in crushing or grinding seeds. Particle size is one critical parameter when using solvent extraction [27]. Small size of seed particles will facilitate solvent extraction by reducing the distances that solvent and oil must diffuse in and out of the seed particle during the extraction process. The smaller the particle size, the greater the interfacial area between the solid and the solvent, thus increasing the rate of transfer of the oil and solvent outside of the seed particles [28]. Figure 4 shows that the smaller size of the particle will produce high amount of oil yield.Figure 4
Biodiesel conversion by changing the particle size.


### 3.3. Karanja Biodiesel Yield Analysis

#### 3.3.1. The Effect of Methanol to Oil Ratio

It has been reported that alcohol to oil ratio has a significant parameter, affecting the conversion yield of triglycerides to methyl ester [29]. According to stoichiometric ratio for transesterification process, 1 mol. of triglyceride and 3 mol. of alcohol are required to yield 1 mol. of glycerol and 3 mol. of fatty acid alkyl esters. Nevertheless, transesterification is an equilibrium reaction where large amount of alcohol is needed to drive the reaction to right. Relationship between molar ratio and esters yield are not affected by iodine value, peroxide, acid, and saponification. From Figure 5, the feasible proportion that will induce higher KME yield increased as the methanol to oil ratio increases. Nevertheless, with a later increase of molar ratio to 10 : 1, the lower yield obtained is 75.45%. This was due to the difficulties in separation of glycerol when the molar ratio is higher, as the excess methanol delays the decantation by gravity, thus causing the yield decreases since there are still glycerol leftovers in the biodiesel phase Ac [30, 31]. Krisnangkura and Simamaharnnop [32] have stated that the leftovers glycerol in solution helps to drive the equilibrium back to the left, thus resulting in lowering the biodiesel yield.Figure 5
Biodiesel conversion by changing methanol to oil ratio.


#### 3.3.2. The Effect of Catalyst to Oil Ratio

Figure6 shows the influence of concentration NaOH varied in the range from 0.5% to 1.2% (wt/wt of oil). The best result has been achieved at 84% with a concentration of 1% of catalyst. As a consequence, the further increase in concentration of catalyst causes the formation of an emulsion which increases the viscosity, thus leading to gels development that prohibit the separation of glycerol, thus reducing the yield of methyl ester [33].Figure 6
Biodiesel conversion by changing catalyst to oil ratio.


#### 3.3.3. Effect of Equipment Used

Orbital shaker (OS) and magnetic stirrer cum heater (MS) have been used to study on how different types of equipment can affect the biodiesel yield conversion. Sodium hydroxide has been used as a catalyst with concentration of 1% when methanol to oil ratio was 6 : 1 for 90 minutes. From the results shown in Figure7, OS had successfully converted KME by 86% when compared to MS which obtained yield is only 72%. OS has shown a better and more complete of mixing process for biodiesel conversion. Also, it provides a more balance which contributes to higher conversion efficiency as compared to MS. Therefore, it can be concluded that OS is more reliable equipment to be used in production of methyl esters.Figure 7
Biodiesel conversion by changing type of equipment.


### 3.4. FTIR Analysis

The infrared spectrum of the each of the results is compared and analyzed to identify the functional group, respectively. In the infrared spectrum of karanja biodiesel (Figure8(a)) and conventional diesel (Figure 8(b)), the existing functional group is alkane C–H bond 2800 cm-1 to 3000 m-1 and 1350 cm-1 to 1480 m-1. Although it has been observed that both biodiesel and diesel have the functional group of C–H bond, only biodiesel displays the oxygen functional group such as C=O and C–O. This means that biodiesel, with the existence of oxygen functional group, will promote cleaner and complete combustion.Figure 8
FTIR spectrum of (a) karanja biodiesel and (b) conventional diesel.
(a)
(b)


### 3.5. Properties of Biodiesel

Tables2 and 3 show the analysis and the test methods adopted for the determination of CKO methyl esters properties.Table 2
Properties of crude karanja oil before transesterification and test methods used.
Properties
Karanja oil
Test method
Density, g/mL 15°C
0.924
EN ISO 3675
Kinematic viscosity (40°C), mm2/s
27.82
EN ISO 3104
Water content, %
10.20
EN ISO 12937
FFA, %
15.62
ASTM D5555
Saponification number, mg/g
186.4
ASTM D5558
Acid number, mg KOH/g oil
31.24
EN 14104Table 3
Properties of karanja methyl esters and test methods used.
Property
CKO methyl ester
EN 14214/ASTM limits
Test methods
Acid value, KOH, mg g−1
0.17
0.5 max
EN 14104
Water content, %
0.038
0.05% max
EN ISO 12937
Kinematic viscosity (40°C), mm2/s
4.66 ± 0.02
3.50–5.00
EN ISO 3104
Cloud point, °C
6
NS
EN14214
Pour point, °C
3
NS
ASTM D 97
Flash point, °C
212
120 min
EN22719
Density (15°C), g cm−3
0.883
0.860–0.900
EN ISO 3675
Group 1 metals (Na + K), mg/kg
0.5
EN14214
Free glycerin, wt%
0.0064
0.02
ASTM D6584
Total glycerin, wt%
0.082
0.240
ASTM D6584
Phosphorus, mg/kg
0.04
<4–10
ASTM D4951
Monoglyceride content, wt%
2.63
<0.8
EN4214
Diglyceride content, wt%
0.78
<0.2
EN4214
Triglyceride content, wt%
0.06
<0.2
EN4214
NS: not specified.


### 3.6. Engine Performance Test

The performance of engine using diesel, KME blended with diesel, and CKO is presented and discussed below.Figure9 shows the influence of load on brake horse power (BHP) for different fuels. The graph indicates that BP increases up to 70% load as the load increases and then decreases for all the fuel samples. It can be observed that the BP increases up to B40 and then decreases when compared with different types of blends at different loads [34]. According to Stalin and Prabhu [24], BP for blends B10 to B30 is higher when compared with various blends different load. From the figure, it has been found that brake power for B40 is the best alternative and nearly close to the conventional diesel [20], while the BP for B50 and B100 is less than commercial diesel. Hence, it can be concluded that B40 is suitable blend to be used in diesel engine without modifications. Also, price of B40 can be considerably reduced as compared to commercial diesel.Figure 9
Break power for different loads.Figure10 shows the variation of brake thermal efficiency (BTE). The BTE of KME blends have been found to be on increasing trend up to 70% as the load increases and started to decrease for all blends tested. B50 and B100 show a low brake thermal efficiency. According to Raheman and Phadatare [35], this lower brake thermal efficiency obtained for B60 and B100 could be due to reduction in calorific value and increase in fuel consumption. Besides, it has been observed that the BTE for B40 is nearly the same as the commercial diesel. According to Nagarhalli and Nandedkar [36] no significant change in efficiency is shown in the 40% and 60% blends, thus making them highly recommended.Figure 10
Brake thermal efficiency for different loads.The variation of brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) at different loads is shown in Figure11. Results show that BSFC decreased as the load increases and then BSFC increases for all the fuel samples tested. Similar results have been reported by Stalin and Prabhu [24]. This can be linked with the test results of the BHP. The SFC for B10, B15, and B20 is nearly the same as that of commercial diesel. The results obtained for B40, B50, and B100 are found to be increasing in specific fuel consumption (SFC) but still less than SFC for commercial diesel.Figure 11
Beak horsepower for different loads.


## 3.1. Titrimetric Results on Crude Karanja Oil

Table1 shows the measurement of FFA content in CKO is essential in the transesterification process for biodiesel production [26]. Titration is done using 0.1 mol of KOH solution and it has been repeated 3 times to obtain the average value in order to eliminate parallax errors. Karanja oil was found less than 1%. Thus, one-step transesterification has been carried out. From the titration method, the FFA content in CKO has been found to be within the ranges of 0-1%, which is lower 1%. The best conversion method has been one-step transesterification.Table 1
Free Fatty Acid analysis results of crude karanja oil.
Cycle
W (g)
V (ml)
M (mol)
Acid value (%)
First
2.09
2.4
0.1
0.645
Second
2.02
2.39
0.1
0.666
Third
2.3
2.52
0.1
0.615


## 3.2. Effect of Particle Size of the Seeds to Oil Yield Ratio

Variations of the particle size occur during size reduction in crushing or grinding seeds. Particle size is one critical parameter when using solvent extraction [27]. Small size of seed particles will facilitate solvent extraction by reducing the distances that solvent and oil must diffuse in and out of the seed particle during the extraction process. The smaller the particle size, the greater the interfacial area between the solid and the solvent, thus increasing the rate of transfer of the oil and solvent outside of the seed particles [28]. Figure 4 shows that the smaller size of the particle will produce high amount of oil yield.Figure 4
Biodiesel conversion by changing the particle size.


## 3.3. Karanja Biodiesel Yield Analysis

### 3.3.1. The Effect of Methanol to Oil Ratio

It has been reported that alcohol to oil ratio has a significant parameter, affecting the conversion yield of triglycerides to methyl ester [29]. According to stoichiometric ratio for transesterification process, 1 mol. of triglyceride and 3 mol. of alcohol are required to yield 1 mol. of glycerol and 3 mol. of fatty acid alkyl esters. Nevertheless, transesterification is an equilibrium reaction where large amount of alcohol is needed to drive the reaction to right. Relationship between molar ratio and esters yield are not affected by iodine value, peroxide, acid, and saponification. From Figure 5, the feasible proportion that will induce higher KME yield increased as the methanol to oil ratio increases. Nevertheless, with a later increase of molar ratio to 10 : 1, the lower yield obtained is 75.45%. This was due to the difficulties in separation of glycerol when the molar ratio is higher, as the excess methanol delays the decantation by gravity, thus causing the yield decreases since there are still glycerol leftovers in the biodiesel phase Ac [30, 31]. Krisnangkura and Simamaharnnop [32] have stated that the leftovers glycerol in solution helps to drive the equilibrium back to the left, thus resulting in lowering the biodiesel yield.Figure 5
Biodiesel conversion by changing methanol to oil ratio.


### 3.3.2. The Effect of Catalyst to Oil Ratio

Figure6 shows the influence of concentration NaOH varied in the range from 0.5% to 1.2% (wt/wt of oil). The best result has been achieved at 84% with a concentration of 1% of catalyst. As a consequence, the further increase in concentration of catalyst causes the formation of an emulsion which increases the viscosity, thus leading to gels development that prohibit the separation of glycerol, thus reducing the yield of methyl ester [33].Figure 6
Biodiesel conversion by changing catalyst to oil ratio.


### 3.3.3. Effect of Equipment Used

Orbital shaker (OS) and magnetic stirrer cum heater (MS) have been used to study on how different types of equipment can affect the biodiesel yield conversion. Sodium hydroxide has been used as a catalyst with concentration of 1% when methanol to oil ratio was 6 : 1 for 90 minutes. From the results shown in Figure7, OS had successfully converted KME by 86% when compared to MS which obtained yield is only 72%. OS has shown a better and more complete of mixing process for biodiesel conversion. Also, it provides a more balance which contributes to higher conversion efficiency as compared to MS. Therefore, it can be concluded that OS is more reliable equipment to be used in production of methyl esters.Figure 7
Biodiesel conversion by changing type of equipment.


## 3.3.1. The Effect of Methanol to Oil Ratio

It has been reported that alcohol to oil ratio has a significant parameter, affecting the conversion yield of triglycerides to methyl ester [29]. According to stoichiometric ratio for transesterification process, 1 mol. of triglyceride and 3 mol. of alcohol are required to yield 1 mol. of glycerol and 3 mol. of fatty acid alkyl esters. Nevertheless, transesterification is an equilibrium reaction where large amount of alcohol is needed to drive the reaction to right. Relationship between molar ratio and esters yield are not affected by iodine value, peroxide, acid, and saponification. From Figure 5, the feasible proportion that will induce higher KME yield increased as the methanol to oil ratio increases. Nevertheless, with a later increase of molar ratio to 10 : 1, the lower yield obtained is 75.45%. This was due to the difficulties in separation of glycerol when the molar ratio is higher, as the excess methanol delays the decantation by gravity, thus causing the yield decreases since there are still glycerol leftovers in the biodiesel phase Ac [30, 31]. Krisnangkura and Simamaharnnop [32] have stated that the leftovers glycerol in solution helps to drive the equilibrium back to the left, thus resulting in lowering the biodiesel yield.Figure 5
Biodiesel conversion by changing methanol to oil ratio.


## 3.3.2. The Effect of Catalyst to Oil Ratio

Figure6 shows the influence of concentration NaOH varied in the range from 0.5% to 1.2% (wt/wt of oil). The best result has been achieved at 84% with a concentration of 1% of catalyst. As a consequence, the further increase in concentration of catalyst causes the formation of an emulsion which increases the viscosity, thus leading to gels development that prohibit the separation of glycerol, thus reducing the yield of methyl ester [33].Figure 6
Biodiesel conversion by changing catalyst to oil ratio.


## 3.3.3. Effect of Equipment Used

Orbital shaker (OS) and magnetic stirrer cum heater (MS) have been used to study on how different types of equipment can affect the biodiesel yield conversion. Sodium hydroxide has been used as a catalyst with concentration of 1% when methanol to oil ratio was 6 : 1 for 90 minutes. From the results shown in Figure7, OS had successfully converted KME by 86% when compared to MS which obtained yield is only 72%. OS has shown a better and more complete of mixing process for biodiesel conversion. Also, it provides a more balance which contributes to higher conversion efficiency as compared to MS. Therefore, it can be concluded that OS is more reliable equipment to be used in production of methyl esters.Figure 7
Biodiesel conversion by changing type of equipment.


## 3.4. FTIR Analysis

The infrared spectrum of the each of the results is compared and analyzed to identify the functional group, respectively. In the infrared spectrum of karanja biodiesel (Figure8(a)) and conventional diesel (Figure 8(b)), the existing functional group is alkane C–H bond 2800 cm-1 to 3000 m-1 and 1350 cm-1 to 1480 m-1. Although it has been observed that both biodiesel and diesel have the functional group of C–H bond, only biodiesel displays the oxygen functional group such as C=O and C–O. This means that biodiesel, with the existence of oxygen functional group, will promote cleaner and complete combustion.Figure 8
FTIR spectrum of (a) karanja biodiesel and (b) conventional diesel.
(a)
(b)


## 3.5. Properties of Biodiesel

Tables2 and 3 show the analysis and the test methods adopted for the determination of CKO methyl esters properties.Table 2
Properties of crude karanja oil before transesterification and test methods used.
Properties
Karanja oil
Test method
Density, g/mL 15°C
0.924
EN ISO 3675
Kinematic viscosity (40°C), mm2/s
27.82
EN ISO 3104
Water content, %
10.20
EN ISO 12937
FFA, %
15.62
ASTM D5555
Saponification number, mg/g
186.4
ASTM D5558
Acid number, mg KOH/g oil
31.24
EN 14104Table 3
Properties of karanja methyl esters and test methods used.
Property
CKO methyl ester
EN 14214/ASTM limits
Test methods
Acid value, KOH, mg g−1
0.17
0.5 max
EN 14104
Water content, %
0.038
0.05% max
EN ISO 12937
Kinematic viscosity (40°C), mm2/s
4.66 ± 0.02
3.50–5.00
EN ISO 3104
Cloud point, °C
6
NS
EN14214
Pour point, °C
3
NS
ASTM D 97
Flash point, °C
212
120 min
EN22719
Density (15°C), g cm−3
0.883
0.860–0.900
EN ISO 3675
Group 1 metals (Na + K), mg/kg
0.5
EN14214
Free glycerin, wt%
0.0064
0.02
ASTM D6584
Total glycerin, wt%
0.082
0.240
ASTM D6584
Phosphorus, mg/kg
0.04
<4–10
ASTM D4951
Monoglyceride content, wt%
2.63
<0.8
EN4214
Diglyceride content, wt%
0.78
<0.2
EN4214
Triglyceride content, wt%
0.06
<0.2
EN4214
NS: not specified.


## 3.6. Engine Performance Test

The performance of engine using diesel, KME blended with diesel, and CKO is presented and discussed below.Figure9 shows the influence of load on brake horse power (BHP) for different fuels. The graph indicates that BP increases up to 70% load as the load increases and then decreases for all the fuel samples. It can be observed that the BP increases up to B40 and then decreases when compared with different types of blends at different loads [34]. According to Stalin and Prabhu [24], BP for blends B10 to B30 is higher when compared with various blends different load. From the figure, it has been found that brake power for B40 is the best alternative and nearly close to the conventional diesel [20], while the BP for B50 and B100 is less than commercial diesel. Hence, it can be concluded that B40 is suitable blend to be used in diesel engine without modifications. Also, price of B40 can be considerably reduced as compared to commercial diesel.Figure 9
Break power for different loads.Figure10 shows the variation of brake thermal efficiency (BTE). The BTE of KME blends have been found to be on increasing trend up to 70% as the load increases and started to decrease for all blends tested. B50 and B100 show a low brake thermal efficiency. According to Raheman and Phadatare [35], this lower brake thermal efficiency obtained for B60 and B100 could be due to reduction in calorific value and increase in fuel consumption. Besides, it has been observed that the BTE for B40 is nearly the same as the commercial diesel. According to Nagarhalli and Nandedkar [36] no significant change in efficiency is shown in the 40% and 60% blends, thus making them highly recommended.Figure 10
Brake thermal efficiency for different loads.The variation of brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) at different loads is shown in Figure11. Results show that BSFC decreased as the load increases and then BSFC increases for all the fuel samples tested. Similar results have been reported by Stalin and Prabhu [24]. This can be linked with the test results of the BHP. The SFC for B10, B15, and B20 is nearly the same as that of commercial diesel. The results obtained for B40, B50, and B100 are found to be increasing in specific fuel consumption (SFC) but still less than SFC for commercial diesel.Figure 11
Beak horsepower for different loads.


## 4. Conclusions

This research has successfully investigated the potential of crude karanja oil (CKO) as a sustainable feedstock from Sarawak, Malaysia, for biodiesel production. Soxhlet extraction has been used to produce CKO, while biodiesel has been produced by transesterification of CKO using NaOH and MeOH. Physiochemical properties of CKO and karanja biodiesel were investigated according to EN 14214 biodiesel standards. Besides, the biodiesel blends fueled engine test results such as BHP, BTE, and BSFC have been used to describe the suitability of KME as substitute fuel for diesel engines and the performance this engine has been found to be optimum.



---

*Source: 4174205-2018-01-30.xml*