# Percentage Destabilization Effect of Some West African Medicinal Plants on the Outer Membrane of Various Bacteria Involved in Infectious Diarrhea

Authors: Victorien Dougnon; Edna Hounsa; Eric Agbodjento; Lunga Paul Keilah; Brice Boris Legba; Kevin Sintondji; Anny Afaton; Jean Robert Klotoe; Lamine Baba-Moussa; Honoré Bankole
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Previous work stated thatKhaya senegalensis, Anacardium ouest L., Pterocarpus erinaceus, Diospyros mespiliformis, Ocimum gratissimum, Manihot esculenta, Vernonia amygdalina Delile, and Daniellia oliveri have a great potential for the fight against infectious diarrhea. However, data on their antibacterial activity on strains of bacteria responsible for infectious diarrhea are not available. This study is aimed at elucidating the mechanism of action of the antibacterial effect of these plants on some bacterial strains responsible for diarrheal infections. The design of the study included first evaluating the degree of sensitivity of Salmonella typhimurium 14028, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Shigella spp., and Salmonella spp. strains to aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of each plant, followed by the determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and antibiotic power (Pa). This screening was completed with the evaluation of the possible mode of action of the extracts by testing the membrane permeability of these bacterial strains. The data collected indicate that the bacterial strains tested were sensitive to the extracts to varying degrees, except Cassia sieberiana DC and Pseudocedrela kotschyi extracts. For the active extracts, inhibition diameters ranged from 18.33 mm to 7 mm. With the exception of Escherichia coli, all strains were sensitive to the aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Anacardium occidentale. MICs vary between 3.37 and 25 mg/ml. Membrane permeability test data show that all active extracts affect the bacterial strains tested by attacking the stability of their outer membrane. For all active extracts, the high percentage of membrane destabilization of the bacteria is significantly (p<0.05) better than that of cefixime used as a reference. Thus, it appears that these extracts can destroy Gram-negative bacteria and increase the fluidity and permeability of their cytoplasmic membrane. The knowledge of the mechanism of action of these extracts is an interesting contribution to the fundamental knowledge on the alternative that medicinal plants represent to antibiotics. These extracts can be used in the management of infectious diarrhea.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Infectious diseases constitute a major public health problem due to their frequency and gravity especially in developing countries [1]. Among these diseases, diarrheal diseases are the most fatal, especially in children from West Africa. In fact, these diarrheal diseases are responsible for 1.8 million deaths each year worldwide where 90% are children under the age of five living in developing countries [2]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), diarrheal diseases represent the third cause of death from infectious diseases of all ages and the 5th cause of premature death worldwide [3].In Benin, diarrheal diseases are one of the main causes of morbidity. Indeed, they have a direct impact on the costs associated with healthcare, including several factors such as consultation, medication, and, in some cases, hospitalization, which represents a burden on household spending [4]. The pathogens of diarrheal diseases are mainly bacteria [5]. Medical therapy based on the use of conventional antibiotics has shown its effectiveness but also its limits over the years. In fact, most of the bacteria responsible for diarrheal episodes develop resistance to the antibiotics used in modern therapy. Nowadays, antimicrobial resistance constitutes a real public health problem for the effective management of infectious diseases. In addition, the difficulty of access to antibiotics by the populations linked to their costs and the therapeutic failures resulting from antimicrobial resistance reinforces the use of herbal recipe by the populations. The World Health Organization (WHO) supports this solution approach and had initiated a diarrheal disease control program based on traditional medicine practices and prevention approaches [6]. This approach is even more justified given that about 80% of the population of developing countries like Benin continue to use traditional medicine based on the use of medicinal plants for their primary health needs [7].Khaya senegalensis, Anacardium ouest L., Cassia sieberiana DC., Pterocarpus erinaceus, Diospyros mespiliformis, Ocimum gratissimum, Manihot esculenta, Vernonia amygdalina Delile, Pseudocedrela kotschyi, and Daniellia oliveri are among the most widely used medicinal plants in the management of infectious diarrhea in West Africa [8]. Numerous scientific works have been carried out to enhance their value, notably through the determination of their antibacterial activity. In this way, antibacterial activity of leaves and stem bark of K. senegalensis [9], ethanol extract of leaves of Anacardium occidentale L. [10], methanol extract of C. sieberiana [11], extracts of Pterocarpus erinaceus [12], leaf and stem bark extracts of Diospyros mespiliformis [13], essential oils extracted from fresh leaves of Ocimum gratissimum [14], Vernonia amygdalina extracts [15], M. esculenta leaf extract [16], roots and leaf extracts of P. kotschyi [17], and extracts of D. oliveri [18] have been demonstrated on bacterial strains, responsible for infectious diarrhea. However, despite the multiplicity of data available on the antimicrobial properties of these plants, few studies explored the mechanism of action of their antibacterial activity.This study was initiated to fill this gap of data on the mechanism of action of the antibacterial effect ofKhaya senegalensis, Anacardium occidentale L., Cassia sieberiana DC., Pterocarpus erinaceus, Diospyros mespiliformis, Ocimum gratissimum, Manihot esculenta, Vernonia amygdalina Delile, Pseudocedrela kotschyi, and Daniellia oliveri. It is aimed at elucidating the mechanism of action of the antibacterial effect of aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of each plant on Gram-negative bacteria involved in diarrheal infections. These data will help support strategies to develop these medicinal plants as alternatives to antibiotics.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Plant Material

The plant material consists of 10 medicinal plants used in the traditional treatment of infectious diarrhea in West Africa [8]. The characteristics of each medicinal plant are presented in Table 1.Table 1
Plant material.
Identification numberScientific nameBotanical familyUsed partCollection area (municipality)Collection periodYH 434/HNBAnacardium occidentale L.AnacardiaceaeLeavesAbomey-CalaviJuly 2020YH 436/HNBDaniellia oliveri (Rolfe) Hutch. & DalzielLeguminosaeLeavesToffoJuly 2020YH 438/HNBDiospyros mespiliformis Hochst. ex A. DC.EbenaceaeLeavesToffoJuly 2020YH 435/HNBKhaya senegalensis (Desr.) A. Juss.MeliaceaeBarkAbomey-CalaviJuly 2020YH 442/HNBManihot esculenta CrantzEuphorbiaceaeLeavesAbomey-CalaviJuly 2020YH 437/HNBOcimum gratissimum L.LamiaceaeLeavesAbomey-CalaviJuly 2020YH 440/HNBPterocarpus erinaceus Poir.EuphorbiaceaeLeavesToffoJuly 2020YH 441/HNBRauvolfia vomitoria Afzel.ApocynaceaLeavesPorto-NovoAugust 2020YH 432/HNBSenna italica Mill.LeguminosaeLeavesTanguietaJuly 2020YH 439/HNBVernonia amygdalina DelileAsteraceaeLeavesAbomey-CalaviJuly 2020


### 2.2. Bacterial Strains

Five strains of Gram-negative bacteria involved in the occurrence of diarrheal infections were used. They have been obtained from the Research Unit in Applied Microbiology and Pharmacology of Natural Substances (Polytechnic School of Abomey-Calavi, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin). The characteristics of these strains are summarized in Table2.Table 2
Bacterial species.
Bacterial strainsOriginSalmonella typhimurium 14028ReferenceEscherichia coli 25922ReferenceShigella spp.Clinical strainSalmonella spp.Clinical strain


### 2.3. Plant Extraction

Plant organs were cleaned and dried at room temperature in the Research Unit in Applied Microbiology and Pharmacology of Natural Substances. They were powdered using the electric mill Retsch SM 2000/1430/Upm/Smf. Two types of extraction (aqueous and hydroethanolic) were carried out according to the methodology used by [15]. Fifty (50) grams of powder was macerated in 500 ml of solvent (water and water-ethanol in equal volume). The mixture was stirred continuously for 72 hours at room temperature. The homogenate obtained was filtered three times on cotton wool and once on Whatman paper No. 1. The filtrate obtained was then evaporated at a temperature of 40°C in an oven (oven) until obtaining a dry mass, which represents the extract. The extract thus obtained was stored in the refrigerator at 4°C and put back into solution during the various tests.


### 2.4.In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Plant Extracts

The aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of each plant were taken up in distilled water at a rate of 100 mg per 1 ml. Initial solutions concentrated at 100 mg/ml were thus prepared. The sterility of the initial extract solutions was verified by inoculating aliquots of each solution on Mueller Hinton medium according to the methodology applied by [16].


#### 2.4.1. Antibiogram by Well Diffusion Technique

A portion of pure 24-hour colony from Mueller Hinton’s medium from each strain was emulsified in 5 ml of physiological water to obtain a turbidity of 0.5 on the McFarland scale. Each inoculum was inoculated by swabbing onto Petri box containing Mueller Hinton agar [17]. Using the sterile Pasteur pipette tip, wells of 6 mm diameter were dug. 50 μl of each extract was placed in the previously dug wells. A well containing sterile distilled water served as a negative control. Standard antibiotic discs (ciprofloxacin, cefixime, and gentamicin) were used as positive controls. The Petri dish was left for 1 hour at room temperature for prediffusion of the substances, before being incubated at 37°C in an oven for 18 hours. The test was repeated three times. After the incubation period, the plates were examined for measurements of inhibition diameter. The standard used for reading the results of the antibiogram tests is presented in Table 3 [7–18].Table 3
Standard used for reading the results of antibiogram tests of plant extracts.
Inhibitory diameter (Δ)Germ sensibilityΔ<7mmResistant7mm≤Δ<8mmSensitive8mm≤Δ<9mmModerately sensitiveΔ≥9mmVery sensitive


#### 2.4.2. Determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of Active Extracts

The 96-well plate method was used in this study [19]. 100 μl of the initial extract solution, prepared at 200 mg/ml, was added to 100 μl of Mueller Hinton broth. A series of dilution from well to well was carried out, and then, 100 μl of various bacterial suspensions was added. Positive and negative controls were prepared, respectively, by adding 100 μl of MH broth to 100 μl of bacterial suspension and 100 μl of MH broth to 100 μl of the extracts. The microplates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. MIC was estimated by adding tetrazolium. All the wells of MIC at the higher concentrations were then inoculated on a Mueller Hinton agar; then, the Petri box was placed at 37°C for 24 hours for the determination of the MBC. MBC is the smallest concentration of extract for which no colony of bacteria can be observed. The antibiotic power (Pa) of each extract was then calculated with the formula MBC/MIC. The antibacterial effect or power is judged to be bactericidal or bacteriostatic based on Pa=MBC/MIC. If 1≤Pa≤2, the effect is bactericidal, and if 4≤Pa≥16, the effect is bacteriostatic.


### 2.5. Permeability Test of the Outer Membrane of Gram-Negative Bacteria

This test is based on the evaluation of the destabilizing power of the membrane of bacteria by plant extracts. In a 96-well microplate, MIC and 2 MIC of the extract in triplicate were prepared by serial dilution. 100μl of the suspension of the tested bacteria (1.5×106CFU/ml) was added to all wells, and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Cefixime was used as a positive control. Muller Hinton broth and bacterial suspension served as negative control. The optical densities were read at 405 nm (wavelength at which the complex form between lipopolysaccharides and membrane stabilizing divalent cation absorbs) [5]. The percentage of destabilization was calculated using the formula below:
(1)%D=Ao−AsAs×100.%D is the percentage of destabilization; Ao is the absorbance of the negative control; As is the absorbance of test samples.


### 2.6. Data Analysis

Thein vitro antibacterial test was repeated three times, and the results were analyzed using GraphPad 7 software. The quantitative variables were then presented as mean±standarddeviation. ANOVA was used to compare the percentage of membrane destabilization of the bacteria. The significance level was set at 5%.


## 2.1. Plant Material

The plant material consists of 10 medicinal plants used in the traditional treatment of infectious diarrhea in West Africa [8]. The characteristics of each medicinal plant are presented in Table 1.Table 1
Plant material.
Identification numberScientific nameBotanical familyUsed partCollection area (municipality)Collection periodYH 434/HNBAnacardium occidentale L.AnacardiaceaeLeavesAbomey-CalaviJuly 2020YH 436/HNBDaniellia oliveri (Rolfe) Hutch. & DalzielLeguminosaeLeavesToffoJuly 2020YH 438/HNBDiospyros mespiliformis Hochst. ex A. DC.EbenaceaeLeavesToffoJuly 2020YH 435/HNBKhaya senegalensis (Desr.) A. Juss.MeliaceaeBarkAbomey-CalaviJuly 2020YH 442/HNBManihot esculenta CrantzEuphorbiaceaeLeavesAbomey-CalaviJuly 2020YH 437/HNBOcimum gratissimum L.LamiaceaeLeavesAbomey-CalaviJuly 2020YH 440/HNBPterocarpus erinaceus Poir.EuphorbiaceaeLeavesToffoJuly 2020YH 441/HNBRauvolfia vomitoria Afzel.ApocynaceaLeavesPorto-NovoAugust 2020YH 432/HNBSenna italica Mill.LeguminosaeLeavesTanguietaJuly 2020YH 439/HNBVernonia amygdalina DelileAsteraceaeLeavesAbomey-CalaviJuly 2020


## 2.2. Bacterial Strains

Five strains of Gram-negative bacteria involved in the occurrence of diarrheal infections were used. They have been obtained from the Research Unit in Applied Microbiology and Pharmacology of Natural Substances (Polytechnic School of Abomey-Calavi, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin). The characteristics of these strains are summarized in Table2.Table 2
Bacterial species.
Bacterial strainsOriginSalmonella typhimurium 14028ReferenceEscherichia coli 25922ReferenceShigella spp.Clinical strainSalmonella spp.Clinical strain


## 2.3. Plant Extraction

Plant organs were cleaned and dried at room temperature in the Research Unit in Applied Microbiology and Pharmacology of Natural Substances. They were powdered using the electric mill Retsch SM 2000/1430/Upm/Smf. Two types of extraction (aqueous and hydroethanolic) were carried out according to the methodology used by [15]. Fifty (50) grams of powder was macerated in 500 ml of solvent (water and water-ethanol in equal volume). The mixture was stirred continuously for 72 hours at room temperature. The homogenate obtained was filtered three times on cotton wool and once on Whatman paper No. 1. The filtrate obtained was then evaporated at a temperature of 40°C in an oven (oven) until obtaining a dry mass, which represents the extract. The extract thus obtained was stored in the refrigerator at 4°C and put back into solution during the various tests.


## 2.4.In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Plant Extracts

The aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of each plant were taken up in distilled water at a rate of 100 mg per 1 ml. Initial solutions concentrated at 100 mg/ml were thus prepared. The sterility of the initial extract solutions was verified by inoculating aliquots of each solution on Mueller Hinton medium according to the methodology applied by [16].


### 2.4.1. Antibiogram by Well Diffusion Technique

A portion of pure 24-hour colony from Mueller Hinton’s medium from each strain was emulsified in 5 ml of physiological water to obtain a turbidity of 0.5 on the McFarland scale. Each inoculum was inoculated by swabbing onto Petri box containing Mueller Hinton agar [17]. Using the sterile Pasteur pipette tip, wells of 6 mm diameter were dug. 50 μl of each extract was placed in the previously dug wells. A well containing sterile distilled water served as a negative control. Standard antibiotic discs (ciprofloxacin, cefixime, and gentamicin) were used as positive controls. The Petri dish was left for 1 hour at room temperature for prediffusion of the substances, before being incubated at 37°C in an oven for 18 hours. The test was repeated three times. After the incubation period, the plates were examined for measurements of inhibition diameter. The standard used for reading the results of the antibiogram tests is presented in Table 3 [7–18].Table 3
Standard used for reading the results of antibiogram tests of plant extracts.
Inhibitory diameter (Δ)Germ sensibilityΔ<7mmResistant7mm≤Δ<8mmSensitive8mm≤Δ<9mmModerately sensitiveΔ≥9mmVery sensitive


### 2.4.2. Determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of Active Extracts

The 96-well plate method was used in this study [19]. 100 μl of the initial extract solution, prepared at 200 mg/ml, was added to 100 μl of Mueller Hinton broth. A series of dilution from well to well was carried out, and then, 100 μl of various bacterial suspensions was added. Positive and negative controls were prepared, respectively, by adding 100 μl of MH broth to 100 μl of bacterial suspension and 100 μl of MH broth to 100 μl of the extracts. The microplates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. MIC was estimated by adding tetrazolium. All the wells of MIC at the higher concentrations were then inoculated on a Mueller Hinton agar; then, the Petri box was placed at 37°C for 24 hours for the determination of the MBC. MBC is the smallest concentration of extract for which no colony of bacteria can be observed. The antibiotic power (Pa) of each extract was then calculated with the formula MBC/MIC. The antibacterial effect or power is judged to be bactericidal or bacteriostatic based on Pa=MBC/MIC. If 1≤Pa≤2, the effect is bactericidal, and if 4≤Pa≥16, the effect is bacteriostatic.


## 2.4.1. Antibiogram by Well Diffusion Technique

A portion of pure 24-hour colony from Mueller Hinton’s medium from each strain was emulsified in 5 ml of physiological water to obtain a turbidity of 0.5 on the McFarland scale. Each inoculum was inoculated by swabbing onto Petri box containing Mueller Hinton agar [17]. Using the sterile Pasteur pipette tip, wells of 6 mm diameter were dug. 50 μl of each extract was placed in the previously dug wells. A well containing sterile distilled water served as a negative control. Standard antibiotic discs (ciprofloxacin, cefixime, and gentamicin) were used as positive controls. The Petri dish was left for 1 hour at room temperature for prediffusion of the substances, before being incubated at 37°C in an oven for 18 hours. The test was repeated three times. After the incubation period, the plates were examined for measurements of inhibition diameter. The standard used for reading the results of the antibiogram tests is presented in Table 3 [7–18].Table 3
Standard used for reading the results of antibiogram tests of plant extracts.
Inhibitory diameter (Δ)Germ sensibilityΔ<7mmResistant7mm≤Δ<8mmSensitive8mm≤Δ<9mmModerately sensitiveΔ≥9mmVery sensitive


## 2.4.2. Determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of Active Extracts

The 96-well plate method was used in this study [19]. 100 μl of the initial extract solution, prepared at 200 mg/ml, was added to 100 μl of Mueller Hinton broth. A series of dilution from well to well was carried out, and then, 100 μl of various bacterial suspensions was added. Positive and negative controls were prepared, respectively, by adding 100 μl of MH broth to 100 μl of bacterial suspension and 100 μl of MH broth to 100 μl of the extracts. The microplates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. MIC was estimated by adding tetrazolium. All the wells of MIC at the higher concentrations were then inoculated on a Mueller Hinton agar; then, the Petri box was placed at 37°C for 24 hours for the determination of the MBC. MBC is the smallest concentration of extract for which no colony of bacteria can be observed. The antibiotic power (Pa) of each extract was then calculated with the formula MBC/MIC. The antibacterial effect or power is judged to be bactericidal or bacteriostatic based on Pa=MBC/MIC. If 1≤Pa≤2, the effect is bactericidal, and if 4≤Pa≥16, the effect is bacteriostatic.


## 2.5. Permeability Test of the Outer Membrane of Gram-Negative Bacteria

This test is based on the evaluation of the destabilizing power of the membrane of bacteria by plant extracts. In a 96-well microplate, MIC and 2 MIC of the extract in triplicate were prepared by serial dilution. 100μl of the suspension of the tested bacteria (1.5×106CFU/ml) was added to all wells, and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Cefixime was used as a positive control. Muller Hinton broth and bacterial suspension served as negative control. The optical densities were read at 405 nm (wavelength at which the complex form between lipopolysaccharides and membrane stabilizing divalent cation absorbs) [5]. The percentage of destabilization was calculated using the formula below:
(1)%D=Ao−AsAs×100.%D is the percentage of destabilization; Ao is the absorbance of the negative control; As is the absorbance of test samples.


## 2.6. Data Analysis

Thein vitro antibacterial test was repeated three times, and the results were analyzed using GraphPad 7 software. The quantitative variables were then presented as mean±standarddeviation. ANOVA was used to compare the percentage of membrane destabilization of the bacteria. The significance level was set at 5%.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Antibacterial Activities of the Extracts

Aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts ofAnacardium occidentale, Daniellia oliveri, Diospyros mespiliformis, Ocimum gratissimum, Khaya senegalensis, Vernonia amygdalina, Pterocarpus erinaceus, and Manihot esculenta were tested on Shigella spp., Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14029, Salmonella spp. 19, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter spp., through antibiogram and determination of MIC and MBC.


#### 3.1.1. Results of Antibiogram

As for the extracts ofOcimum gratissimum, only the aqueous extract was active. The extract inhibited Salmonella spp. (P19) with an inhibition diameter of 7±645mm. Only Daniellia oliveri hydroethanolic extract was active. The extract inhibited Shigella spp., Salmonella typhimurium, and Campylobacter sp. The highest inhibition diameter obtained with this extract is 14±2.309 on Campylobacter spp. The aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Diospyros mespiliformis had a variable sensitivity on the different strains. The largest inhibition diameters were obtained on Salmonella spp. (P19) and Campylobacter spp. (10 mm) for the hydroethanolic extract. On the aqueous extract side, the largest inhibition diameter is also obtained on Campylobacter sp. (9.67 mm). With regard to extracts of Vernonia amygdalina, a low activity was generally observed on all strains. Only the ethanolic extract was active, but on only one strain (Salmonella typhimurium), with an inhibition diameter of 9.67 mm. The aqueous extract of Khaya senegalensis was not active on any of the strains tested. Hydroethanolic extract was active on Shigella spp., Salmonella typhimurium, and Salmonella spp. (P19). Hydroethanolic (PEb) extracts of Pterocarpus erinaceus were only active on Salmonella typhimurium (10.33 mm) while hydroethanolic extract of Manihot esculenta was only active on Salmonella spp. (P19) (7 mm). With the exception of Escherichia coli, all strains were sensitive to the aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts of Anacardium occidentale (Figure 1).Figure 1
Susceptibility of bacterial strains to the plant extracts tested.


#### 3.1.2. MIC, MBC, and Pa

The results of MIC, MBC, and Pa of the different extracts on the bacterial strains are presented in Table4. MICs vary between 3.37 and 25 mg/ml. The hydroethanolic extract of Daniellia oliveri has a bactericidal effect on Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, Shigella spp., and Campylobacter spp. The aqueous extract of Anacardium occidentale has a bacteriostatic effect on Shigella spp. The hydroethanolic extract of Anacardium occidentale has a bacteriostatic effect on both Salmonella strains and on Shigella spp. Moreover, the hydroethanolic extract of Diospyros mespiliformis had a bactericidal effect on all bacterial strains tested (Table 4).Table 4
MIC, MBC, and Pa of the different extracts on the bacterial strains.
Plants extractsParametersBacterial strainsSalmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028E. coli ATCC 25922Shigella spp.Salmonella spp.Campylobacter spp.Hydroethanolic extract ofDaniellia oliveriMIC12.5012.5025MBC12.5012.5025Pa10101Aqueous extract ofAnacardium occidentaleMIC12.512.512.56.250MBC12.512.55012.50Pa11420Hydroethanolic extract ofAnacardium occidentaleMIC12.56.256.256.250MBC506.2525500Pa41480Aqueous extract ofDiospyros mespiliformisMIC25012.512.512.5MBC25012.512.5100Pa10118Hydroethanolic extract ofDiospyros mespiliformisMIC256.252512.512.5MBC256.255012.525Pa11212Aqueous extract ofOcimum gratissimumMIC00012.525MBC00012.525Pa00011Hydroethanolic extract ofOcimum gratissimumMIC00000MBC00000Pa00000Aqueous extract ofKhaya senegalensisMIC000250MBC000250Pa00010Hydroethanolic extract ofKhaya senegalensisMIC252525250MBC252525250Pa11110Hydroethanolic extract ofVernonia amygdalinaMIC250000MBC250000Pa10000Hydroethanolic extract ofPterocarpus erinaceusMIC2512.5000MBC2512.5000Pa11000Hydroethanolic extract ofManihot esculentaMIC0003.370MBC0003.370Pa00010MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC: minimum bactericidal concentration; Pa: antibacterial power.


### 3.2. Effects of Extracts on the Outer Membrane Permeability of Bacterial Strains

Figures2–6 present the percentage destabilization effect of active extracts on Salmonella spp. (P19), Campylobacter spp., Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, E. coli, and Shigella spp., respectively. For all extracts, no significant difference was reported between the two concentrations of the extracts (p>0.05).Figure 2
Percentage destabilization effect of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts ofAnacardium occidentale, aqueous extracts of Diospyros mespiliformis (DMa) and Ocimum gratissimum (OGa), and hydroethanolic extracts of Manihot esculenta (MEb) and Vernonia amygdalina (VAb) on the outer membranes of Salmonella spp. (P19).Figure 3
Percentage destabilization effect of aqueous extracts ofOcimum gratissimum (OGa), hydroethanolic extract of Daniellia oliveri (DOb), and aqueous extracts (DMa) and hydroethanolic extracts (DMb) of Diospyros mespiliformis on the outer membranes of Campylobacter spp.Figure 4
Percentage destabilization effects of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts ofAnacardium occidentale, aqueous extract of Diospyros mespiliformis (DMa), and hydroethanolic extract of Pterocarpus erinaceus (PEb) on the outer membranes of Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028.Figure 5
Percentage destabilization effect of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts ofAnacardium occidentale, hydroethanolic extract of Diospyros mespiliformis (DMa), and hydroethanolic extract of Pterocarpus erinaceus (PEb) on the outer membranes of E. coli.Figure 6
Percentage destabilization effect of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts ofAnacardium occidentale and hydroethanolic extracts of Daniellia oliveri (DOb) on the outer membranes of Shigella spp.In Figure2, the percentage destabilization effects of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts of Anacardium occidentale, aqueous extracts of Diospyros mespiliformis (DMa) and Ocimum gratissimum (OGa), and hydroethanolic extracts of Manihot esculenta (MEb) and Vernonia amygdalina (VAb) are the same on the outer membranes of Salmonella spp. (P19). The percentage of destabilization obtained for MIC (84.15%) is higher than that of 2 MIC (77.23%). The active extracts complexed more divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime) whose percentage destabilization is 50.63%.Figure3 shows the percentage destabilization effects of aqueous extracts of Ocimum gratissimum (OGa), hydroethanolic extract of Daniellia oliveri (DOb), aqueous extracts (DMa), and hydroethanolic extracts (DMb) of Diospyros mespiliformis on the outer membranes of Campylobacter spp. The percentage destabilization effects are the same for the four extracts. The percentage obtained for MIC (84.15%) is higher than that for 2 MIC (77.23%). The active extracts complexed more divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime) whose percentage destabilization is 50.63%. No significant difference was reported between the two concentrations of the extracts (p>0.05).The percentage destabilization effects of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts ofAnacardium occidentale, aqueous extract of Diospyros mespiliformis (DMa), and hydroethanolic extract of Pterocarpus erinaceus (PEb) are the same on the outer membranes of Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028. The percentage of destabilization obtained for MIC (84.15%) is higher than that for 2 MIC (77.23%). The active extracts complexed more divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime) whose percentage destabilization is 50.63%. No significant difference was reported between the two concentrations of the extracts (p>0.05) (Figure 4).The percentage destabilization effects of hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts ofAnacardium occidentale, hydroethanolic extract of Diospyros mespiliformis (DMb), and hydroethanolic extract of Pterocarpus erinaceus (PEb) are the same on the outer membranes of E. coli. The percentage of destabilization obtained for MIC (84.15%) is higher than that for 2 MIC (77.23%). The three extracts complexed more divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime) whose percentage destabilization is 50.63%. No significant difference was reported between the two concentrations of these three extracts (p>0.05) (Figure 5). On the other hand, a different result is observed with the aqueous extracts of Anacardium occidentale (AOa). The percentage of destabilization obtained for 2 MIC (48.56%) is higher than that for MIC (40.69%), but without significant difference. Furthermore, both concentrations of this extract complexed more divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime), which had a destabilization percentage of 35.73%.Figure6 shows the percentage destabilization effect of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extract of Anacardium occidentale and hydroethanolic extracts of Daniellia oliveri (DOb) on the outer membranes of Shigella spp. The percentage of destabilization obtained for MIC is higher than that for 2 MIC for aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extract of Anacardium occidentale. The active extracts complexed more divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime). No significant difference was reported between the two concentrations of the extracts (p>0.05). On the other hand, a different result is observed with hydroethanolic extracts of Daniellia oliveri (DOb). The percentage of destabilization obtained for 2 MIC (69.84%) is higher than that for MIC (53.72%), but without significant difference. Furthermore, both concentrations of this extract complexed significantly divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime), which had a destabilization percentage of 10.86%.


## 3.1. Antibacterial Activities of the Extracts

Aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts ofAnacardium occidentale, Daniellia oliveri, Diospyros mespiliformis, Ocimum gratissimum, Khaya senegalensis, Vernonia amygdalina, Pterocarpus erinaceus, and Manihot esculenta were tested on Shigella spp., Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14029, Salmonella spp. 19, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter spp., through antibiogram and determination of MIC and MBC.


### 3.1.1. Results of Antibiogram

As for the extracts ofOcimum gratissimum, only the aqueous extract was active. The extract inhibited Salmonella spp. (P19) with an inhibition diameter of 7±645mm. Only Daniellia oliveri hydroethanolic extract was active. The extract inhibited Shigella spp., Salmonella typhimurium, and Campylobacter sp. The highest inhibition diameter obtained with this extract is 14±2.309 on Campylobacter spp. The aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Diospyros mespiliformis had a variable sensitivity on the different strains. The largest inhibition diameters were obtained on Salmonella spp. (P19) and Campylobacter spp. (10 mm) for the hydroethanolic extract. On the aqueous extract side, the largest inhibition diameter is also obtained on Campylobacter sp. (9.67 mm). With regard to extracts of Vernonia amygdalina, a low activity was generally observed on all strains. Only the ethanolic extract was active, but on only one strain (Salmonella typhimurium), with an inhibition diameter of 9.67 mm. The aqueous extract of Khaya senegalensis was not active on any of the strains tested. Hydroethanolic extract was active on Shigella spp., Salmonella typhimurium, and Salmonella spp. (P19). Hydroethanolic (PEb) extracts of Pterocarpus erinaceus were only active on Salmonella typhimurium (10.33 mm) while hydroethanolic extract of Manihot esculenta was only active on Salmonella spp. (P19) (7 mm). With the exception of Escherichia coli, all strains were sensitive to the aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts of Anacardium occidentale (Figure 1).Figure 1
Susceptibility of bacterial strains to the plant extracts tested.


### 3.1.2. MIC, MBC, and Pa

The results of MIC, MBC, and Pa of the different extracts on the bacterial strains are presented in Table4. MICs vary between 3.37 and 25 mg/ml. The hydroethanolic extract of Daniellia oliveri has a bactericidal effect on Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, Shigella spp., and Campylobacter spp. The aqueous extract of Anacardium occidentale has a bacteriostatic effect on Shigella spp. The hydroethanolic extract of Anacardium occidentale has a bacteriostatic effect on both Salmonella strains and on Shigella spp. Moreover, the hydroethanolic extract of Diospyros mespiliformis had a bactericidal effect on all bacterial strains tested (Table 4).Table 4
MIC, MBC, and Pa of the different extracts on the bacterial strains.
Plants extractsParametersBacterial strainsSalmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028E. coli ATCC 25922Shigella spp.Salmonella spp.Campylobacter spp.Hydroethanolic extract ofDaniellia oliveriMIC12.5012.5025MBC12.5012.5025Pa10101Aqueous extract ofAnacardium occidentaleMIC12.512.512.56.250MBC12.512.55012.50Pa11420Hydroethanolic extract ofAnacardium occidentaleMIC12.56.256.256.250MBC506.2525500Pa41480Aqueous extract ofDiospyros mespiliformisMIC25012.512.512.5MBC25012.512.5100Pa10118Hydroethanolic extract ofDiospyros mespiliformisMIC256.252512.512.5MBC256.255012.525Pa11212Aqueous extract ofOcimum gratissimumMIC00012.525MBC00012.525Pa00011Hydroethanolic extract ofOcimum gratissimumMIC00000MBC00000Pa00000Aqueous extract ofKhaya senegalensisMIC000250MBC000250Pa00010Hydroethanolic extract ofKhaya senegalensisMIC252525250MBC252525250Pa11110Hydroethanolic extract ofVernonia amygdalinaMIC250000MBC250000Pa10000Hydroethanolic extract ofPterocarpus erinaceusMIC2512.5000MBC2512.5000Pa11000Hydroethanolic extract ofManihot esculentaMIC0003.370MBC0003.370Pa00010MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC: minimum bactericidal concentration; Pa: antibacterial power.


## 3.1.1. Results of Antibiogram

As for the extracts ofOcimum gratissimum, only the aqueous extract was active. The extract inhibited Salmonella spp. (P19) with an inhibition diameter of 7±645mm. Only Daniellia oliveri hydroethanolic extract was active. The extract inhibited Shigella spp., Salmonella typhimurium, and Campylobacter sp. The highest inhibition diameter obtained with this extract is 14±2.309 on Campylobacter spp. The aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Diospyros mespiliformis had a variable sensitivity on the different strains. The largest inhibition diameters were obtained on Salmonella spp. (P19) and Campylobacter spp. (10 mm) for the hydroethanolic extract. On the aqueous extract side, the largest inhibition diameter is also obtained on Campylobacter sp. (9.67 mm). With regard to extracts of Vernonia amygdalina, a low activity was generally observed on all strains. Only the ethanolic extract was active, but on only one strain (Salmonella typhimurium), with an inhibition diameter of 9.67 mm. The aqueous extract of Khaya senegalensis was not active on any of the strains tested. Hydroethanolic extract was active on Shigella spp., Salmonella typhimurium, and Salmonella spp. (P19). Hydroethanolic (PEb) extracts of Pterocarpus erinaceus were only active on Salmonella typhimurium (10.33 mm) while hydroethanolic extract of Manihot esculenta was only active on Salmonella spp. (P19) (7 mm). With the exception of Escherichia coli, all strains were sensitive to the aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts of Anacardium occidentale (Figure 1).Figure 1
Susceptibility of bacterial strains to the plant extracts tested.


## 3.1.2. MIC, MBC, and Pa

The results of MIC, MBC, and Pa of the different extracts on the bacterial strains are presented in Table4. MICs vary between 3.37 and 25 mg/ml. The hydroethanolic extract of Daniellia oliveri has a bactericidal effect on Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, Shigella spp., and Campylobacter spp. The aqueous extract of Anacardium occidentale has a bacteriostatic effect on Shigella spp. The hydroethanolic extract of Anacardium occidentale has a bacteriostatic effect on both Salmonella strains and on Shigella spp. Moreover, the hydroethanolic extract of Diospyros mespiliformis had a bactericidal effect on all bacterial strains tested (Table 4).Table 4
MIC, MBC, and Pa of the different extracts on the bacterial strains.
Plants extractsParametersBacterial strainsSalmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028E. coli ATCC 25922Shigella spp.Salmonella spp.Campylobacter spp.Hydroethanolic extract ofDaniellia oliveriMIC12.5012.5025MBC12.5012.5025Pa10101Aqueous extract ofAnacardium occidentaleMIC12.512.512.56.250MBC12.512.55012.50Pa11420Hydroethanolic extract ofAnacardium occidentaleMIC12.56.256.256.250MBC506.2525500Pa41480Aqueous extract ofDiospyros mespiliformisMIC25012.512.512.5MBC25012.512.5100Pa10118Hydroethanolic extract ofDiospyros mespiliformisMIC256.252512.512.5MBC256.255012.525Pa11212Aqueous extract ofOcimum gratissimumMIC00012.525MBC00012.525Pa00011Hydroethanolic extract ofOcimum gratissimumMIC00000MBC00000Pa00000Aqueous extract ofKhaya senegalensisMIC000250MBC000250Pa00010Hydroethanolic extract ofKhaya senegalensisMIC252525250MBC252525250Pa11110Hydroethanolic extract ofVernonia amygdalinaMIC250000MBC250000Pa10000Hydroethanolic extract ofPterocarpus erinaceusMIC2512.5000MBC2512.5000Pa11000Hydroethanolic extract ofManihot esculentaMIC0003.370MBC0003.370Pa00010MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC: minimum bactericidal concentration; Pa: antibacterial power.


## 3.2. Effects of Extracts on the Outer Membrane Permeability of Bacterial Strains

Figures2–6 present the percentage destabilization effect of active extracts on Salmonella spp. (P19), Campylobacter spp., Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, E. coli, and Shigella spp., respectively. For all extracts, no significant difference was reported between the two concentrations of the extracts (p>0.05).Figure 2
Percentage destabilization effect of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts ofAnacardium occidentale, aqueous extracts of Diospyros mespiliformis (DMa) and Ocimum gratissimum (OGa), and hydroethanolic extracts of Manihot esculenta (MEb) and Vernonia amygdalina (VAb) on the outer membranes of Salmonella spp. (P19).Figure 3
Percentage destabilization effect of aqueous extracts ofOcimum gratissimum (OGa), hydroethanolic extract of Daniellia oliveri (DOb), and aqueous extracts (DMa) and hydroethanolic extracts (DMb) of Diospyros mespiliformis on the outer membranes of Campylobacter spp.Figure 4
Percentage destabilization effects of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts ofAnacardium occidentale, aqueous extract of Diospyros mespiliformis (DMa), and hydroethanolic extract of Pterocarpus erinaceus (PEb) on the outer membranes of Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028.Figure 5
Percentage destabilization effect of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts ofAnacardium occidentale, hydroethanolic extract of Diospyros mespiliformis (DMa), and hydroethanolic extract of Pterocarpus erinaceus (PEb) on the outer membranes of E. coli.Figure 6
Percentage destabilization effect of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts ofAnacardium occidentale and hydroethanolic extracts of Daniellia oliveri (DOb) on the outer membranes of Shigella spp.In Figure2, the percentage destabilization effects of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts of Anacardium occidentale, aqueous extracts of Diospyros mespiliformis (DMa) and Ocimum gratissimum (OGa), and hydroethanolic extracts of Manihot esculenta (MEb) and Vernonia amygdalina (VAb) are the same on the outer membranes of Salmonella spp. (P19). The percentage of destabilization obtained for MIC (84.15%) is higher than that of 2 MIC (77.23%). The active extracts complexed more divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime) whose percentage destabilization is 50.63%.Figure3 shows the percentage destabilization effects of aqueous extracts of Ocimum gratissimum (OGa), hydroethanolic extract of Daniellia oliveri (DOb), aqueous extracts (DMa), and hydroethanolic extracts (DMb) of Diospyros mespiliformis on the outer membranes of Campylobacter spp. The percentage destabilization effects are the same for the four extracts. The percentage obtained for MIC (84.15%) is higher than that for 2 MIC (77.23%). The active extracts complexed more divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime) whose percentage destabilization is 50.63%. No significant difference was reported between the two concentrations of the extracts (p>0.05).The percentage destabilization effects of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts ofAnacardium occidentale, aqueous extract of Diospyros mespiliformis (DMa), and hydroethanolic extract of Pterocarpus erinaceus (PEb) are the same on the outer membranes of Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028. The percentage of destabilization obtained for MIC (84.15%) is higher than that for 2 MIC (77.23%). The active extracts complexed more divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime) whose percentage destabilization is 50.63%. No significant difference was reported between the two concentrations of the extracts (p>0.05) (Figure 4).The percentage destabilization effects of hydroethanolic (AOb) extracts ofAnacardium occidentale, hydroethanolic extract of Diospyros mespiliformis (DMb), and hydroethanolic extract of Pterocarpus erinaceus (PEb) are the same on the outer membranes of E. coli. The percentage of destabilization obtained for MIC (84.15%) is higher than that for 2 MIC (77.23%). The three extracts complexed more divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime) whose percentage destabilization is 50.63%. No significant difference was reported between the two concentrations of these three extracts (p>0.05) (Figure 5). On the other hand, a different result is observed with the aqueous extracts of Anacardium occidentale (AOa). The percentage of destabilization obtained for 2 MIC (48.56%) is higher than that for MIC (40.69%), but without significant difference. Furthermore, both concentrations of this extract complexed more divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime), which had a destabilization percentage of 35.73%.Figure6 shows the percentage destabilization effect of aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extract of Anacardium occidentale and hydroethanolic extracts of Daniellia oliveri (DOb) on the outer membranes of Shigella spp. The percentage of destabilization obtained for MIC is higher than that for 2 MIC for aqueous (AOa) and hydroethanolic (AOb) extract of Anacardium occidentale. The active extracts complexed more divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime). No significant difference was reported between the two concentrations of the extracts (p>0.05). On the other hand, a different result is observed with hydroethanolic extracts of Daniellia oliveri (DOb). The percentage of destabilization obtained for 2 MIC (69.84%) is higher than that for MIC (53.72%), but without significant difference. Furthermore, both concentrations of this extract complexed significantly divalent ions than the positive control (cefixime), which had a destabilization percentage of 10.86%.


## 4. Discussion

This study was aimed at providing scientific data on the mechanism of action of the antibacterial effect ofKhaya senegalensis, Anacardium occidentale L., Cassia sieberiana DC., Pterocarpus erinaceus, Diospyros mespiliformis, Ocimum gratissimum, Manihot esculenta, Vernonia amygdalina Delile, Pseudocedrela kotschyi, and Daniellia oliveri. These plants are among the most widely used medicinal plants in the management of infectious diarrhea in West Africa [8].


### 4.1. Antibacterial Screening

Antibacterial screening showed that the bacterial strains were sensitive to the plant extracts to varying degrees, exceptCassia sieberiana DC and Pseudocedrela kotschyi extracts. Inhibition diameters ranged from 18.33 mm to 7 mm, and MICs vary between 3.37 and 25 mg/ml. The antibacterial activity of the extracts of these plants on bacterial strains responsible for infectious diarrhea justifies their use in the traditional treatment of infectious diarrhea. In addition, this activity confirms the data reported in the scientific literature.The aqueous extract ofOcimum gratissimum was active on Salmonella spp. The diameter of inhibition was 7 mm, suggesting a weak antibacterial activity, especially since the extracts of this plant were active on only one strain. When digging through the literature, more interesting antibacterial activities of O. gratissimum were found on bacterial strains responsible for infectious diarrhea. But in these studies, it is much more the essential oils of the plant that are used, since it is an aromatic plant. As an illustration, essential oils of O. gratissimum were active on Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli [20]. Other study showed that the fresh leaf essential oils of Ocimum gratissimum were active against Salmonella Oakland and Salmonella Legon [14]. Daniellia oliveri hydroethanolic extract was active on Shigella spp., Salmonella typhimurium, and Campylobacter sp. The extract was not active on E. coli. However, a study performed in Nigeria showed that ethanol, methanol, acetone, and cold and hot water extracts of Daniellia oliveri were active on E. coli [21]. It can thus be assumed that the antibacterial activity could have extended to this strain if these different types of extracts were used. The hydroethanolic extract of Khaya senegalensis was active on Shigella spp., Salmonella typhimurium, and Salmonella spp. (P19) while the aqueous extract had no activity. None of the extracts was active on E. coli. However, in the scientific literature, it is shown that the aqueous, ethanolic, and methanolic extracts of Khaya senegalensis were active on Escherichia coli (carbapenem-resistant strain) [22]. The characteristics of the bacterial strains tested can possibly be evoked to explain these differences.Anacardium occidentale was the most active plant. Its extracts were active on all strains, with the exception of Escherichia coli. The largest diameter of inhibition was also obtained with this plant. The interesting antibacterial potential has already been evoked in the scientific literature, illustrated by several scientific works. There are reasons to assume that this activity is due to pinocembrin, a phenolic compound isolated from Anacardium occidentale and active on S. dysenteriae, S. typhi, and E. coli [23]. Cassia sieberiana DC and Pseudocedrela kotschyi extracts were not active on any bacterial strain. We can only attribute this result to the origin of the strains and their characteristics or even to the type of extract, since data on the antibacterial activity of these two plants exist in the literature. For example, it was shown that the ethyl acetate extract of Pseudocedrela kotschyi was effective on Salmonella typhi and Escherichia coli [24].In general, the hydroethanolic extract was more active than the aqueous extract. The difference in the antibacterial activity of the extracts observed in this study could be explained by the capacity of the mixed solvent to concentrate more bioactive molecule than the water used for the extraction of the active ingredients of medicinal plants. Indeed, Klotoé et al. [25] supported this idea via a study on the quantification of bioactive molecules in aqueous, hydroethanolic, and ethanolic extracts of some plants used in the treatment of male infertility in South Benin.


### 4.2. Mechanism of Action of the Active Extract

In the literature, several models of studying the mode of action of antibacterial agents in relation to different bacterial targets have been proposed [26]. In this study, the permeability test of the outer membrane of bacteria was adopted to evaluate the mechanism of action of the active extracts against Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., E. coli, and Salmonella spp., five strains involved in diarrheal infections. The data obtained highlight a remarkable potential for destabilizing the membrane of the bacterial strains of the extracts tested with a better effect compared to cefixime used as a reference. These observations reflect that the extracts have a more enhanced mode of action on the destabilization of the outer membrane of the bacterial strains tested than cefixime. Similar results were reported by [5] for different extracts of Garcinia kola and Alchornea cordifolia and Polymyxin B used as a reference in their study and which has the same mode of action as cefixime. Previous studies have also looked at the mechanism of action of Ocimum gratissimum. The essential oil of this plant has been shown to exert its antibacterial activity on Salmonella spp. by increasing the permeability of microbial cell membrane as evidenced by LIVE/DEAD BacLight assay. In addition, the authors also hypothesized a disruptive action of the oil on the cytoplasmic membrane of the bacteria [20].For most of the extracts tested, the percentage of destabilization on the outer membrane of the strains is higher for MIC than for the 2 MIC, which allows us to make two hypotheses to be tested in subsequent work: (1) for these extracts, the percentage of destabilization could not be related to the concentration and (2) the percentage of destabilization is higher at low concentration. On the other hand, a different result is observed withAnacardium occidentale (AOa) on E. coli and hydroethanolic extracts of Daniellia oliveri (DOb) on Shigella spp. But, in all cases, no significant difference is obtained between the percentages of the two concentrations of the same extract.The mechanism of action of the antibacterial activity of the extracts tested on strains responsible for diarrheal infections could be attributed to phenolic compounds (flavonoids, tannins, etc.).Daniellia oliveri contains steroids/terpenes, carbohydrates/sugars, flavonoids, and tannins [18]. Vernonia amygdalina leaves contain flavonoids, alkaloids, mucilages, quinone derivatives, coumarins, reducing compounds, and saponins [27]. O. gratissimum contains catechin tannins, gallic tannins, flavones, and free anthracene derivatives [28]. D. mespiliformis contains flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins, steroids, triterpenes, and saponins [29]. C. sieberiana leaves contain phenols, tannins, flavonoids, saponins, and anthraquinones [30]. Anacardium occidentale L. contains phenolic compounds, tannins, saponins, and alkaloids [31]. Phenolic compounds are known to disorganize and weaken the interactions between lipopolysaccharides by complexing divalent cations stabilizing the outer membrane of bacteria [32, 33]. This antibacterial action promotes the bursting of the cytoplasmic membrane, an increase in its fluidity and permeability, disruption of the proteins incorporated in this membrane, inhibition of respiration, and alterations in ionic homeostasis between the intracellular and extracellular compartments of Gram-negative bacteria [34]. Thus, the membrane antigens responsible for the virulence of bacteria would be affected. These observations explain the destabilizing effect of the active extracts.


## 4.1. Antibacterial Screening

Antibacterial screening showed that the bacterial strains were sensitive to the plant extracts to varying degrees, exceptCassia sieberiana DC and Pseudocedrela kotschyi extracts. Inhibition diameters ranged from 18.33 mm to 7 mm, and MICs vary between 3.37 and 25 mg/ml. The antibacterial activity of the extracts of these plants on bacterial strains responsible for infectious diarrhea justifies their use in the traditional treatment of infectious diarrhea. In addition, this activity confirms the data reported in the scientific literature.The aqueous extract ofOcimum gratissimum was active on Salmonella spp. The diameter of inhibition was 7 mm, suggesting a weak antibacterial activity, especially since the extracts of this plant were active on only one strain. When digging through the literature, more interesting antibacterial activities of O. gratissimum were found on bacterial strains responsible for infectious diarrhea. But in these studies, it is much more the essential oils of the plant that are used, since it is an aromatic plant. As an illustration, essential oils of O. gratissimum were active on Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli [20]. Other study showed that the fresh leaf essential oils of Ocimum gratissimum were active against Salmonella Oakland and Salmonella Legon [14]. Daniellia oliveri hydroethanolic extract was active on Shigella spp., Salmonella typhimurium, and Campylobacter sp. The extract was not active on E. coli. However, a study performed in Nigeria showed that ethanol, methanol, acetone, and cold and hot water extracts of Daniellia oliveri were active on E. coli [21]. It can thus be assumed that the antibacterial activity could have extended to this strain if these different types of extracts were used. The hydroethanolic extract of Khaya senegalensis was active on Shigella spp., Salmonella typhimurium, and Salmonella spp. (P19) while the aqueous extract had no activity. None of the extracts was active on E. coli. However, in the scientific literature, it is shown that the aqueous, ethanolic, and methanolic extracts of Khaya senegalensis were active on Escherichia coli (carbapenem-resistant strain) [22]. The characteristics of the bacterial strains tested can possibly be evoked to explain these differences.Anacardium occidentale was the most active plant. Its extracts were active on all strains, with the exception of Escherichia coli. The largest diameter of inhibition was also obtained with this plant. The interesting antibacterial potential has already been evoked in the scientific literature, illustrated by several scientific works. There are reasons to assume that this activity is due to pinocembrin, a phenolic compound isolated from Anacardium occidentale and active on S. dysenteriae, S. typhi, and E. coli [23]. Cassia sieberiana DC and Pseudocedrela kotschyi extracts were not active on any bacterial strain. We can only attribute this result to the origin of the strains and their characteristics or even to the type of extract, since data on the antibacterial activity of these two plants exist in the literature. For example, it was shown that the ethyl acetate extract of Pseudocedrela kotschyi was effective on Salmonella typhi and Escherichia coli [24].In general, the hydroethanolic extract was more active than the aqueous extract. The difference in the antibacterial activity of the extracts observed in this study could be explained by the capacity of the mixed solvent to concentrate more bioactive molecule than the water used for the extraction of the active ingredients of medicinal plants. Indeed, Klotoé et al. [25] supported this idea via a study on the quantification of bioactive molecules in aqueous, hydroethanolic, and ethanolic extracts of some plants used in the treatment of male infertility in South Benin.


## 4.2. Mechanism of Action of the Active Extract

In the literature, several models of studying the mode of action of antibacterial agents in relation to different bacterial targets have been proposed [26]. In this study, the permeability test of the outer membrane of bacteria was adopted to evaluate the mechanism of action of the active extracts against Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., E. coli, and Salmonella spp., five strains involved in diarrheal infections. The data obtained highlight a remarkable potential for destabilizing the membrane of the bacterial strains of the extracts tested with a better effect compared to cefixime used as a reference. These observations reflect that the extracts have a more enhanced mode of action on the destabilization of the outer membrane of the bacterial strains tested than cefixime. Similar results were reported by [5] for different extracts of Garcinia kola and Alchornea cordifolia and Polymyxin B used as a reference in their study and which has the same mode of action as cefixime. Previous studies have also looked at the mechanism of action of Ocimum gratissimum. The essential oil of this plant has been shown to exert its antibacterial activity on Salmonella spp. by increasing the permeability of microbial cell membrane as evidenced by LIVE/DEAD BacLight assay. In addition, the authors also hypothesized a disruptive action of the oil on the cytoplasmic membrane of the bacteria [20].For most of the extracts tested, the percentage of destabilization on the outer membrane of the strains is higher for MIC than for the 2 MIC, which allows us to make two hypotheses to be tested in subsequent work: (1) for these extracts, the percentage of destabilization could not be related to the concentration and (2) the percentage of destabilization is higher at low concentration. On the other hand, a different result is observed withAnacardium occidentale (AOa) on E. coli and hydroethanolic extracts of Daniellia oliveri (DOb) on Shigella spp. But, in all cases, no significant difference is obtained between the percentages of the two concentrations of the same extract.The mechanism of action of the antibacterial activity of the extracts tested on strains responsible for diarrheal infections could be attributed to phenolic compounds (flavonoids, tannins, etc.).Daniellia oliveri contains steroids/terpenes, carbohydrates/sugars, flavonoids, and tannins [18]. Vernonia amygdalina leaves contain flavonoids, alkaloids, mucilages, quinone derivatives, coumarins, reducing compounds, and saponins [27]. O. gratissimum contains catechin tannins, gallic tannins, flavones, and free anthracene derivatives [28]. D. mespiliformis contains flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins, steroids, triterpenes, and saponins [29]. C. sieberiana leaves contain phenols, tannins, flavonoids, saponins, and anthraquinones [30]. Anacardium occidentale L. contains phenolic compounds, tannins, saponins, and alkaloids [31]. Phenolic compounds are known to disorganize and weaken the interactions between lipopolysaccharides by complexing divalent cations stabilizing the outer membrane of bacteria [32, 33]. This antibacterial action promotes the bursting of the cytoplasmic membrane, an increase in its fluidity and permeability, disruption of the proteins incorporated in this membrane, inhibition of respiration, and alterations in ionic homeostasis between the intracellular and extracellular compartments of Gram-negative bacteria [34]. Thus, the membrane antigens responsible for the virulence of bacteria would be affected. These observations explain the destabilizing effect of the active extracts.


## 5. Conclusion

The antibacterial activity ofKhaya senegalensis, Anacardium occidentale L., Pterocarpus erinaceus, Diospyros mespiliformis, Ocimum gratissimum, Manihot esculenta, Vernonia amygdalina Delile, and Daniellia oliveri was confirmed on bacterial strains involved in infectious diarrhea. All active extracts affect the bacterial strains tested by attacking the stability of their outer membrane. These data will help support strategies to develop these medicinal plants as alternatives to antibiotics.



---

*Source: 4134713-2021-09-09.xml*