# Generation Control of ZnO Nanoparticles Using a Coaxial Gas-Flow Pulse Plasma Ar/O2 Plasma

Authors: Hiroki Shirahata; Satoru Iizuka
Journal: Journal of Nanoparticles
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Generation of ZnO nanoparticles was investigated using a coaxial gas-flow pulse plasma. We studied how zinc atoms, sputtered from a zinc target, reacted with oxygen in a plasma and/or on a substrate to form ZnO nanoparticles when the discharge parameters, such as applied pulse voltage and gas flow rate, were controlled in an O2/Ar plasma. The formation processes were estimated by SEM, TEM, and EDX. We observed many ZnO nanoparticles deposited on Si substrate. The particle yield and size were found to be controlled by changing the experimental parameters. The diameter of the particles was typically 50–200 nm.


---

## Body

## 1.
Introduction

Zinc oxide (ZnO) is an n-type semiconductor with a wide band gap of 3.37 eV, a large exciton binding energy of 60 meV, and high thermal and mechanical stability. Therefore, there are many applications of ZnO such as transparent electrodes, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and semiconductor materials [1–6].ZnO nanostructures such as nanorods and nanoparticles showed a definite promise for an employment in nanoscale devices, including field emitters, UV lasers, field-effect transistors, dye sensitized solar cells, and gas sensors. In addition, spherical ZnO nanoparticle was expected for an application to quantum dot solar cells [7–9].In general, ZnO nanorods and nanoparticles have been produced by vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) process, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and liquid laser melting method. Our group is focusing on a plasma process for the growth of oxide metal nanostructures [10–14]. This process is superior to the other processes for low temperature and large area deposition. Besides, when the energy of plasma is controlled, ZnO thin films or ZnO nanoparticles can be selectively produced. However, very few studies have dealt with energy-controlled plasma.In this study, the formation of ZnO nanoparticles was investigated by focusing on its dependence on the discharge parameters such as applied pulse voltageV
p (−500 to −800 V) and total gas flow rate of Ar/O2 (20 to 100 sccm) under the fixed total pressure (30 Pa) of working gases of Ar and O2.


## 2.
Experimental Setup

Figure1 shows a schematic of the experimental apparatus [14]. The experiment was performed in low-pressure plasma by employing reactive ion sputtering. As a source of Zn, Zn rod electrode (diameter 2 mm) was used and installed in a glass tube of 6 mm in inner diameter and 1 mm thick. The flow rates of Ar and O2 gases were adjusted by mass flow controllers independently and the mixed gas was introduced into a stainless tube. A pulse voltage V
p with pulse width of 5 μs was employed for the plasma production.Figure 1
Experimental apparatus.Partial pressure ratio of Ar/O2 and pulse repetition frequency were fixed during the experiment. The substrate used was Si wafer (p type, crystal orientation 100). The electrode configuration including the substrate position was also fixed. The distance between the electrode tip and Si substrate was fixed at 5 mm. The wavelength of the optical emission from the plasma was monitored and evaluated by the optical emission spectroscope (OES). ZnO deposition was analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Since the length of the glass tube and the substrate plate was small (~10 mm), the pressure in the discharge region was nearly as much as that in the vacuum chamber. Typically, the gas flow rate ratio of argon to oxygen was fixed at Ar/O2 = 1/1 under a total pressure of Ar and O2 fixed at 30 Pa.


## 3. Experimental Results

The experiment was conducted when O2 and Ar flow rates were 25 and 25 sccm, respectively; that is, O2/Ar = 1/1, and the total pressure was 30 Pa. From the results of optical emission spectroscopy (OES) during the deposition, the emission spectra of Ar and O2 were observed, but those of Zn were not observed. The results implied that our experimental condition was in an oxide mode. That is, the zinc target electrode surface was oxidized to form ZnO thin layer during the sputtering deposition.


### 3.1. Time Dependence of Nanoparticle Deposition

Figure2 shows typical SEM images of the depositions on the Si substrate with a deposition time as a parameter at applied voltage −650 V. Very few particles were observed at 10 minutes after turning on the plasma. At 90 minute, we clearly observed many particles deposited on the Si substrate. The changes of the particle density and the particle size were plotted in Figure 3 as a function of deposition time. For 10-minute deposition an average diameter of the particles was 55.3 nm and their density was 0.25 particles/μm2. However, for 30-minute deposition, the average diameter of particles was increased to 137 nm, but their density was still 0.23 particles/μm2. As the deposition time was further increased, both the diameter and density were increased. Finally, we got average diameter of 207 nm and the density of 1.3 particles/μm2 for 90-minute deposition.Figure 2
SEM images of particles deposited on Si substrate with deposition time as a parameter. Applied voltageV
p is −650 V and flow rate ratio of Ar/O2 is 25 sccm/25 sccm.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 3
Variation of particle size and density as a function of the deposition time. Applied voltageV
p is −650 V and flow rate ratio of Ar/O2 is 25 sccm/25 sccm.As shown by the SEM image in Figure2(c), the particle size seemed to be very uniform. In order to evaluate the uniformity of particle size, particle size distribution function was taken by sampling the particles within an area of 10 μm × 10 μm, which was chosen randomly. Figure 4 shows the particle size distribution function for the particles deposited after 90 minutes shown in Figure 2(c). We got a very sharp profile with a mean size of 208 nm. Half width of the distribution was about 20 nm; therefore almost all particles have a size within 208
±
10 nm. Therefore, the uniformity or the irregularity was within ±5%. The reason why the particle size was so uniform was closely related to the growth mechanism of these particles. The reason was discussed in Section 4.Figure 4
Particle size distribution function of the particles deposited on Si substrate after 90 minutes deposition.


### 3.2. Identification of Nanoparticles

Figure5(a) is a magnified SEM image for the 90-minute deposition. We can observe many particles deposited on the background layer with fine structures. Cross-sectional TEM image of Figure 5(a) is shown in Figure 5(b), where we find that two nanoparticles are adhered to the background surface layer deposited on Si surface. The particle size was 100 nm and the shape was a little bit irregular with polygon surface. Many triangular-shape corners were seemed to grow on the particle surface. This structure meant that many polycrystals were coagulated to form a nanoparticle. On the other hand, the background layer, to which nanoparticle was adhered, consisted of columnar rod structure. Fine surface structures of the background layer shown in Figure 5(a) were identified as a top view of such columnar layers.Figure 5
(a) SEM image of particles deposited on Si substrate. (b) TEM image of the cross section of (a). Nanoparticles on background surface layer deposited on Si substrate. (c) Magnified nanoparticles in (a). (d) EDX spectrum of nanoparticle marked by + on the particle in (c).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)It should be noted that the nanoparticles were not buried in the background layer. The nanoparticles were simply adhered to the top surface of the background layer. This result showed important information on the formation mechanism of nanoparticles. It should be also noted that the polygon surface structure of nanoparticles shown in Figure5(b) indicated that these nanoparticles consisted of polycrystals, as described above.In order to identify the atomic composition of such nanoparticles, EDX analysis was carried out. SEM image in Figure5(c) shows a typical particle, which is subjected to EDX analysis. As shown by the spectrum in Figure 5(d), both zinc and oxygen were detected together with intense signals coming from Si substrate. No other atomic species were detected as a contamination contained in the nanoparticles. From this result, it was confirmed that the nanoparticles only consisted of zinc and oxygen. Here, atomic ratio of Zn/O2 was not estimated from this signal, because signal of O2 came from both ZnO and oxidized silicon surface SiO2.Figure6 shows Raman spectra of the deposited sample shown in Figure 5(a) (upper trace) and standard ZnO sample (lower trace). It is known that ZnO has a single peak at 440 cm−1 as shown in the lower trace. There also appeared a sharp peak at 440 cm−1 in the upper trace together with a strong peak of Si at 530 cm−1. Therefore, our sample containing nanoparticles consisted of ZnO crystal. Although the laser spot diameter was about 2 μm, larger than the size of nanoparticles, the signal in Figure 6 showed a growth of ZnO crystal on Si substrate including nanoparticles. By taking their sharp polygon structures into account, the nanoparticles observed were identified as ZnO nanoparticles.Figure 6
Raman spectra of the sample after 90 minutes deposition (upper trace) and ZnO standard sample (lower trace).


### 3.3. Applied Voltage Dependence of Nanoparticle Deposition

Typical SEM images of the depositions on Si substrate were shown in Figure7 with applied voltage V
p as a parameter for 30-minute deposition. Very few particles were observed when V
p = −500 V. When applied voltage was below −500 V, almost no particle deposition was observed. However, with increasing the applied voltage, the number of particles was increased. When V
p = −800 V, we observed many particles deposited on Si substrate. The change of particle size and density was plotted in Figure 8 as a function of the applied voltage. When V
p
=
-
500 V, the particle size was 140 nm. The size was increased with V
p. It was remarkable that the particle deposition density was abruptly increased with V
p. When V
p
=
-
800 V, the particle size was 190 nm and its density was 1.9 particles/μm2. From this experiment, the applied voltage was very important for the production of ZnO nanoparticles. The uniformity of nanoparticle size was also preferable for a high voltage deposition.Figure 7
SEM images of particles deposited on Si substrate with applied voltageV
p as a parameter. Flow rate ratio of Ar/O2 is 25 sccm/25 sccm for 30 min deposition.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 8
Variation of particle size and density as a function of applied voltage. Flow rate ratio of Ar/O2 is 25 sccm/25 sccm for 30 min deposition.


### 3.4. Gas Flow Rate Dependence of Nanoparticle Deposition

Gas flow rate is also important factor for the particle deposition. Since in our case the oxidation of zinc took place on the surface of the zinc target, oxygen component ratio was important factor. Moreover, the oxidized zinc particles were sputtered by Ar ions. Therefore, the amount of Ar was also an important factor. We here fixed the gas flow rate ratio as O2 : Ar = 1 : 1. Only total flow rate of the mixed gas was changed when keeping the gas pressure constant by changing the pumping speed. Figure 9 shows SEM images for 3 different total flow rates, that is, 20 sccm, 50 sccm, and 100 sccm. It became clear that the particle deposition was also depending on the gas flow rate. Very few particles were observed at 20 sccm. However, the number of particles was increased with the gas flow rate.Figure 9
SEM images of particles deposited on Si substrate with total gas flow rate as a parameter. Applied voltageV
p is −650 V for 30 min deposition with flow rate ratio of Ar/O2 being 1/1.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure10 shows variation of particle size and density as a function of total gas flow rate. As shown in this figure, the particle density was saturated when the flow rate was 100 sccm; but the particle size was strongly dependent on the gas flow rate. The size was abruptly increased with the flow rate. The particle density was 0.9 particles/μm2 at total flow rate of 100 sccm. This dependency seemed to be closely related to a variation of plasma parameters such as electron density and electron temperature. We will discuss the mechanism in final section.Figure 10
Variation of particle size and density as a function of total gas flow rate. Applied voltageV
p is −650 V for 30 min deposition with flow rate ratio of Ar/O2 being 1/1. Total pressure is fixed at 30 Pa by changing the pumping speed.


### 3.5. Plasma Parameter Measurement

The dependences of nanoparticle formation on the applied voltage and gas flow rate showed that the size and density of ZnO nanoparticles were able to be controlled by these experimental parameters. In particular, high voltage with a large amount of gas flow rate was a key parameter for getting a preferable nanoparticle yield. In order to understand particle size and density dependencies on the applied voltage and the gas flow rate, we carried out the plasma parameter measurement, that is, the electron density and electron temperature of the plasma produced.Figure11 shows the electron density and electron temperature as a function of the applied voltage. When the voltage was increased, the electron density increased in almost proportion to the applied voltage. Application of high voltage led to an increase of the electric field for the discharge, which resulted in a plasma density increase. On the other hand, the electron temperature was not much varied by the applied voltage. The energy absorbed by the electrons was mainly used for ionization and was not used for the increase of electron temperature.Figure 11
Variation of electron density and electron temperature of the plasma as a function of applied voltage.The dependency of the plasma parameters on the total gas flow rate was shown in Figure12. Although the electron temperature was almost constant, the electron density was increased with the gas flow rate, even when the total gas pressure was kept constant. The increase of the plasma density gave rise to an increase of the sputtering yield, which finally increased the number of nanoparticles. From these results, the plasma density was very important for the nanoparticle formation.Figure 12
Variation of electron density and electron temperature of the plasma as a function of total gas flow rate.


## 3.1. Time Dependence of Nanoparticle Deposition

Figure2 shows typical SEM images of the depositions on the Si substrate with a deposition time as a parameter at applied voltage −650 V. Very few particles were observed at 10 minutes after turning on the plasma. At 90 minute, we clearly observed many particles deposited on the Si substrate. The changes of the particle density and the particle size were plotted in Figure 3 as a function of deposition time. For 10-minute deposition an average diameter of the particles was 55.3 nm and their density was 0.25 particles/μm2. However, for 30-minute deposition, the average diameter of particles was increased to 137 nm, but their density was still 0.23 particles/μm2. As the deposition time was further increased, both the diameter and density were increased. Finally, we got average diameter of 207 nm and the density of 1.3 particles/μm2 for 90-minute deposition.Figure 2
SEM images of particles deposited on Si substrate with deposition time as a parameter. Applied voltageV
p is −650 V and flow rate ratio of Ar/O2 is 25 sccm/25 sccm.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 3
Variation of particle size and density as a function of the deposition time. Applied voltageV
p is −650 V and flow rate ratio of Ar/O2 is 25 sccm/25 sccm.As shown by the SEM image in Figure2(c), the particle size seemed to be very uniform. In order to evaluate the uniformity of particle size, particle size distribution function was taken by sampling the particles within an area of 10 μm × 10 μm, which was chosen randomly. Figure 4 shows the particle size distribution function for the particles deposited after 90 minutes shown in Figure 2(c). We got a very sharp profile with a mean size of 208 nm. Half width of the distribution was about 20 nm; therefore almost all particles have a size within 208
±
10 nm. Therefore, the uniformity or the irregularity was within ±5%. The reason why the particle size was so uniform was closely related to the growth mechanism of these particles. The reason was discussed in Section 4.Figure 4
Particle size distribution function of the particles deposited on Si substrate after 90 minutes deposition.


## 3.2. Identification of Nanoparticles

Figure5(a) is a magnified SEM image for the 90-minute deposition. We can observe many particles deposited on the background layer with fine structures. Cross-sectional TEM image of Figure 5(a) is shown in Figure 5(b), where we find that two nanoparticles are adhered to the background surface layer deposited on Si surface. The particle size was 100 nm and the shape was a little bit irregular with polygon surface. Many triangular-shape corners were seemed to grow on the particle surface. This structure meant that many polycrystals were coagulated to form a nanoparticle. On the other hand, the background layer, to which nanoparticle was adhered, consisted of columnar rod structure. Fine surface structures of the background layer shown in Figure 5(a) were identified as a top view of such columnar layers.Figure 5
(a) SEM image of particles deposited on Si substrate. (b) TEM image of the cross section of (a). Nanoparticles on background surface layer deposited on Si substrate. (c) Magnified nanoparticles in (a). (d) EDX spectrum of nanoparticle marked by + on the particle in (c).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)It should be noted that the nanoparticles were not buried in the background layer. The nanoparticles were simply adhered to the top surface of the background layer. This result showed important information on the formation mechanism of nanoparticles. It should be also noted that the polygon surface structure of nanoparticles shown in Figure5(b) indicated that these nanoparticles consisted of polycrystals, as described above.In order to identify the atomic composition of such nanoparticles, EDX analysis was carried out. SEM image in Figure5(c) shows a typical particle, which is subjected to EDX analysis. As shown by the spectrum in Figure 5(d), both zinc and oxygen were detected together with intense signals coming from Si substrate. No other atomic species were detected as a contamination contained in the nanoparticles. From this result, it was confirmed that the nanoparticles only consisted of zinc and oxygen. Here, atomic ratio of Zn/O2 was not estimated from this signal, because signal of O2 came from both ZnO and oxidized silicon surface SiO2.Figure6 shows Raman spectra of the deposited sample shown in Figure 5(a) (upper trace) and standard ZnO sample (lower trace). It is known that ZnO has a single peak at 440 cm−1 as shown in the lower trace. There also appeared a sharp peak at 440 cm−1 in the upper trace together with a strong peak of Si at 530 cm−1. Therefore, our sample containing nanoparticles consisted of ZnO crystal. Although the laser spot diameter was about 2 μm, larger than the size of nanoparticles, the signal in Figure 6 showed a growth of ZnO crystal on Si substrate including nanoparticles. By taking their sharp polygon structures into account, the nanoparticles observed were identified as ZnO nanoparticles.Figure 6
Raman spectra of the sample after 90 minutes deposition (upper trace) and ZnO standard sample (lower trace).


## 3.3. Applied Voltage Dependence of Nanoparticle Deposition

Typical SEM images of the depositions on Si substrate were shown in Figure7 with applied voltage V
p as a parameter for 30-minute deposition. Very few particles were observed when V
p = −500 V. When applied voltage was below −500 V, almost no particle deposition was observed. However, with increasing the applied voltage, the number of particles was increased. When V
p = −800 V, we observed many particles deposited on Si substrate. The change of particle size and density was plotted in Figure 8 as a function of the applied voltage. When V
p
=
-
500 V, the particle size was 140 nm. The size was increased with V
p. It was remarkable that the particle deposition density was abruptly increased with V
p. When V
p
=
-
800 V, the particle size was 190 nm and its density was 1.9 particles/μm2. From this experiment, the applied voltage was very important for the production of ZnO nanoparticles. The uniformity of nanoparticle size was also preferable for a high voltage deposition.Figure 7
SEM images of particles deposited on Si substrate with applied voltageV
p as a parameter. Flow rate ratio of Ar/O2 is 25 sccm/25 sccm for 30 min deposition.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 8
Variation of particle size and density as a function of applied voltage. Flow rate ratio of Ar/O2 is 25 sccm/25 sccm for 30 min deposition.


## 3.4. Gas Flow Rate Dependence of Nanoparticle Deposition

Gas flow rate is also important factor for the particle deposition. Since in our case the oxidation of zinc took place on the surface of the zinc target, oxygen component ratio was important factor. Moreover, the oxidized zinc particles were sputtered by Ar ions. Therefore, the amount of Ar was also an important factor. We here fixed the gas flow rate ratio as O2 : Ar = 1 : 1. Only total flow rate of the mixed gas was changed when keeping the gas pressure constant by changing the pumping speed. Figure 9 shows SEM images for 3 different total flow rates, that is, 20 sccm, 50 sccm, and 100 sccm. It became clear that the particle deposition was also depending on the gas flow rate. Very few particles were observed at 20 sccm. However, the number of particles was increased with the gas flow rate.Figure 9
SEM images of particles deposited on Si substrate with total gas flow rate as a parameter. Applied voltageV
p is −650 V for 30 min deposition with flow rate ratio of Ar/O2 being 1/1.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure10 shows variation of particle size and density as a function of total gas flow rate. As shown in this figure, the particle density was saturated when the flow rate was 100 sccm; but the particle size was strongly dependent on the gas flow rate. The size was abruptly increased with the flow rate. The particle density was 0.9 particles/μm2 at total flow rate of 100 sccm. This dependency seemed to be closely related to a variation of plasma parameters such as electron density and electron temperature. We will discuss the mechanism in final section.Figure 10
Variation of particle size and density as a function of total gas flow rate. Applied voltageV
p is −650 V for 30 min deposition with flow rate ratio of Ar/O2 being 1/1. Total pressure is fixed at 30 Pa by changing the pumping speed.


## 3.5. Plasma Parameter Measurement

The dependences of nanoparticle formation on the applied voltage and gas flow rate showed that the size and density of ZnO nanoparticles were able to be controlled by these experimental parameters. In particular, high voltage with a large amount of gas flow rate was a key parameter for getting a preferable nanoparticle yield. In order to understand particle size and density dependencies on the applied voltage and the gas flow rate, we carried out the plasma parameter measurement, that is, the electron density and electron temperature of the plasma produced.Figure11 shows the electron density and electron temperature as a function of the applied voltage. When the voltage was increased, the electron density increased in almost proportion to the applied voltage. Application of high voltage led to an increase of the electric field for the discharge, which resulted in a plasma density increase. On the other hand, the electron temperature was not much varied by the applied voltage. The energy absorbed by the electrons was mainly used for ionization and was not used for the increase of electron temperature.Figure 11
Variation of electron density and electron temperature of the plasma as a function of applied voltage.The dependency of the plasma parameters on the total gas flow rate was shown in Figure12. Although the electron temperature was almost constant, the electron density was increased with the gas flow rate, even when the total gas pressure was kept constant. The increase of the plasma density gave rise to an increase of the sputtering yield, which finally increased the number of nanoparticles. From these results, the plasma density was very important for the nanoparticle formation.Figure 12
Variation of electron density and electron temperature of the plasma as a function of total gas flow rate.


## 4. Discussion

As shown in Figure5(b), ZnO nanoparticles were adhered to the surface of the background layer. Therefore, two mechanisms were considered. One was a mechanism for the formation of nanoparticles and the other was that for the formation of background surface films on Si substrate. Our results showed that nanoparticles and background thin layer were independently generated at the same time. The most important point was the fact that the nanoparticles were not buried in the background layer but were simply adhered to the top of the background layer.This result showed that the nanoparticles were arrived at the substrate after the background layer formation. This meant that the nanoparticles were produced in a space of plasma and grew during their levitation in the discharge [12–14]. It was well known that the nanoparticles were able to be negatively charged by the electrons and were levitating near the sheath edge in front of the wall. Owing to the gas flow, these levitating nanoparticles were carried toward the sheath edge in front of Si substrate and maintained for a long time by a force balance between the electrostatic force by the retarding electric field near the sheath edge and the neutral drag force by the gas flow toward the substrate. In this case, the gravity force might not be so effective, because the mass of nanoparticles was not so much heavy. On the other hand, the background layer was growing independently on the surface of Si substrate during the discharge.We consider the following process. Since oxygen was fed in the gas phase with mixing ratio of Ar/O2 = 1/1, zinc target surface was oxidized by O2 during the discharge. So, surface of Zn target would be covered by ZnO thin film. Therefore, an increase of the plasma density would cause an increase of the sputtering, by which Zn and O atoms were sputtered from the surface ZnO film into the gas phase. These atoms and O2 in the discharge would react to each other to produce ZnO molecules. Then, ZnO clusters were formed after molecular reaction. Since such atoms (Zn and O), molecules (O2 and ZnO), and small size ZnO clusters were scarcely charged, they could arrive at Si substrate, which was known to be negatively biased during the discharge. Then, background surface ZnO layer was deposited as shown in Figure 5(b). On the other hand, since amount of charges by electron attachment increases with an increase in the particle size, ZnO clusters of larger size are charged negatively. So, they were electrostatically trapped in the sheath region in front of the negatively biased substrate. Finally, these charged ZnO clusters grew as ZnO nanoparticles by coagulation in the plasma space. Negatively charged particles were unable to attach to Si surface by a repulsive electric force. Therefore, nanoparticles were unable to be buried in the background layer during their growth during the discharge.The above trapping and growth mechanism could also explain the reason why the particle size was so uniform as shown in Figure4. It was known that mean value and standard deviation of the particle size were determined by successive generation of nucleation and growth depending on the plasma conditions. If the growth conditions are homogeneous in the plasma volume, the process of successive nucleation can be avoided and monosized particle distributions can be achieved, where very sharp particle size distribution could be obtained [15]. It was also shown that mean value of the particle diameter was varied by the deposition time and plasma conditions [15]. These results were well consistent with our results in Figures 2, 7, and 9.When the plasma was turned off, electrons accumulated on Si substrate immediately leaked into the external circuit through semiconducting ZnO background layer. On the other hand, electrons on the negatively charged particles were slowly cancelled by positive ions flowing into the particles. In this way, after turning the discharge off, levitating nanoparticles with slowly decaying narrative charges were able to be transported and adhered to almost charge-free surface of the background layer on Si substrate.It was also remarkable that the spacing of the particles, that is, particle-particle distance on Si substrate, was rather uniform as shown in Figures2(c), 7(c), and 9(c). There was almost no place where the particles were so closely distributed and accumulated. Conversely, very vacant space where almost no particle existed was not observed. Mean distance among the particles on Si substrate was fairly uniform. The reason why they were so arranged with an almost equal particle distance was also related to their slowly decaying negative charges during the flight to the substrate. In the space of the plasma these charged particles were arranged with an almost equal distance during the levitation, forming a regular structure like a lattice in the solid state, by the Coulomb repulsive force. It was considered that these regular structures in the plasma space might be transferred and copied on the substrate surface when the plasma was turned off.In application of this technique to quantum dot devices, for example, a small nanoparticle below a few 10 nm is required. In our experiment, nanoparticles of 55 nm were generated for 10 min deposition as shown in Figure2. In order to generate small nanoparticles with size of 10 nm, short deposition time with low gas flow rate will be effective in future. The importance of the deposition time on a formation of small nanoparticle was also pointed out in [15].


## 5. Conclusion

ZnO nanoparticles were generated under various conditions using a coaxial type electric discharge with Ar/O2 mixed gas. The plasma parameters were measured and characteristic properties of the argon and oxygen plasma were clarified. By comparing with the deposition experiment, it was noted that high density plasma was important for the nanoparticle yield. The diameters of these nanoparticles could be varied in the range of 50–200 nm by controlling the applied voltage and the total gas flow rate.It became clear that ZnO nanoparticles were created in the space of plasma and grew during their levitation under a force balance between the electrostatic force by the sheath edge electric field and the neutral drag force by the gas flow. When the discharge was turned off, these nanoparticles arrived at Si surface where ZnO background layer grew. This mechanism could also explain the size uniformity of the nanoparticles. The particle-particle spacing of these particles on Si substrate could be also explained by the particle charging model.The coaxial electrode discharge system proposed here would be quite useful for growing ZnO nanostructures including nanoparticles.



---

*Source: 410468-2015-09-07.xml*