# Phytochemicals fromKaempferia angustifolia Rosc. and Their Cytotoxic and Antimicrobial Activities

Authors: Sook Wah Tang; Mohd Aspollah Sukari; Bee Keat Neoh; Yunie Soon Yu Yeap; Ahmad Bustamam Abdul; Nurolaini Kifli; Gwendoline Cheng Lian Ee
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Phytochemical investigation on rhizomes ofKaempferia angustifolia has afforded a new abietene diterpene, kaempfolienol (1) along with crotepoxide (2), boesenboxide (3), 2′-hydroxy-4,4′,6′-trimethoxychalcone (4), zeylenol (5), 6-methylzeylenol (6), (24S)-24-methyl-5α-lanosta-9(11), 25-dien-3β-ol (7), sucrose, β-sitosterol, and its glycoside (8). The structures of the compounds were elucidated on the basis of spectroscopic methods (IR, MS, and NMR). Isolation of 6-methylzeylenol (6), (24S)-24-methyl-5α-lanosta-9(11), 25-dien-3β-ol (7), and β-sitosterol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (8) from this plant species has never been reported previously. The spectroscopic data of (7) is firstly described in this paper. Cytotoxic screening indicated that most of the pure compounds tested showed significant activity with (4) showing the most potent activity against HL-60 (human promyelocytic leukemia) and MCF-7 (human breast cancer) cell lines. However, all extracts and most of the pure compounds tested were found to be inactive against HT-29 (human colon cancer) and HeLa (human cervical cancer) cell lines. Similarly, none of the extracts or compounds showed activity in the antimicrobial testing.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Kaempferiais a genus of herbs of over 50 species natives of east tropical Asia belonging to the Zingiberaceae family. It is small rhizomatous herb with usually thick aromatic tuberous roots and short rhizomes.Kaempferia angustifolia is one of theKaempferiaspecies which is less well known in Malaysia, if compared withK. galangaandK. rotunda. Itis locally known asKunci pepet, Kunci menir,orKunci kunot. This plant is tuberous and stemless, has small leaves, and could be found growing wildly in the forests of west and center of Java. It has nice smell and is usually used as medicine to treat cold, stomach-ache, and dysentery, while its rhizome is used for coughs and as a masticatory [1].In recent years, many researchers have indicated the high potential of edible Southeast Asia plants for cancer chemoprevention and as antimicrobial agents. Zingiberaceae have been found to be one of the desirable sources of effective cancer-preventive agents since Zingiberaceous plants demonstrated promising inhibitory effect on the growth of human breast cancer (MCF-7), colon cancer (HT-29 and Col2), lung cancer (A549), stomach cancer (SNU-638), and cervical cancer (CaSki) cell lines [2–4]. Besides, antimicrobial activities of ginger were also a topic of interest. Reports on the screening of extracts or essential oils of members from Zingiberaceae family against bacterial strains, fungi, and yeast have been published [5–7].Alpinia,Curcuma, andZingiberspecies were frequently studied but literature on antimicrobial properties ofKaempferia species was not studied as much. Essential oil ofKaempferia angustifolia has been reported [8] to have moderate antimicrobial activity towards inhibition ofStaphylococcus aureus andPseudomonas aeruginosa (10.63±0.23, 10.03±0.22 mm, resp.) but not againstEscherichia coli,Bacillus subtilis,Streptococcus faecalis,Candida albicans, andMicrosporum gypseum.Phytochemical investigations ofKaempferia species have yielded several compounds including cyclohexane diepoxide derivatives, flavonoids, and diterpenes [9–11]. Most of the consumable ginger rhizomes have long been used as folk medicine for centuries but have not been thoroughly investigated for their bioactive properties yet. Thus, here we wish to report the isolation and cytotoxic and antimicrobial properties of chemical constituents from rhizomes ofKaempferia angustifolia.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. General Experimental Procedures

Melting points (uncorrected) were determined using Barnstead Electrothermal IA 9100 Series melting points equipment. Optical rotations were measured on a Jasco P-2000 polarimeter equipped with a sodium lamp (589 nm). The IR spectra were recorded using KBr discs on Perkin Elmer FTIR spectrophotometer 1650.1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained on JEOL spectrometer at 500 and 125 MHz and/or 400 and 100 MHz, respectively, with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard. Mass spectra were recorded on Shimadzu model QP 5050 A spectrometer. Ultraviolet spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-1601 spectrophotometer. Separation by column chromatography was carried out by using silica gel (Merck 7749, 7734, and 9385), while silica gel 60 PF254 aluminium sheets were used for TLC analysis.


### 2.2. Plant Material and Cytotoxic Cell Lines

Kaempferia angustifoliawas collected from Java, Indonesia, in 2001. The plant was identified by Dr. Sugeng Riyanto, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, and the voucher specimen (number 16/SR/0601-01) was deposited at the herbarium of the institution. The HL-60 (human promyelocytic leukemia), MCF-7 (human breast cancer), HT-29 (human colon cancer), and HeLa (human cervical cancer) cell lines were obtained from the National Cancer Institute, Maryland, USA. Bacterial strains were originally obtained from American Type Cell Culture Collection (ATCC), USA.


### 2.3. Extraction and Isolation

The finely ground air-dried rhizomes (1.0 kg) were extracted repeatedly with petroleum ether, chloroform, and methanol thrice each for 72 hours. The extracts were filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain petroleum ether (8.40 g), chloroform (7.50 g), and methanol (6.70 g) extracts. The petroleum ether extract was triturated with methanol at room temperature to give a solid product which was then filtered and recrystallized in methanol to yield crotepoxide (2) (16 mg). Brown oil extract (5.80 g) was obtained upon evaporation of the filtrate. The extract was subjected to vacuum column chromatography and eluted stepwise with 100% hexane, hexane-ethyl acetate, ethyl acetate-methanol, and 100% methanol. This afforded boesenboxide (3) (40 mg), 2′-hydroxy-4, 4′, 6′-trimethoxychalcone (4) (26 mg), and β-sitosterol (18 mg). Spectroscopic data of compounds2–4 have been reported previously [12]. Chloroform extract was subjected to column chromatography separation and eluted with mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate to give 23 fractions (200 mL each). Fraction three which was eluted from hexane-ethyl acetate (5 : 5) was purified to afford zeylenol (5) (0.238 g), while fraction four obtained from elution with mixture of hexane-ethyl acetate (3 : 7) was rechromatographed over silica gel to give subfractions 17–19 which were then recrystallized with methanol to afford 6-methylzeylenol (6) (42 mg). Methanol extract was fractionated using column chromatography in a similar manner. Eighteen fractions of 200 mL each were collected. Combination and purification of fractions 14 and 15 from elution with ethyl acetate-methanol (7 : 3) gave sucrose (11 mg). A reinvestigation of the sample (765.0 g) from the same source was conducted by extraction with methanol (3×72 hours) to obtain a dark brown viscous liquid extract which was then partitioned with hexane and water with 10% methanol (1 : 1) to give hexane-soluble fraction (10.60 g) as brown yellowish viscous liquid. The hexane fraction (8.00 g) was subjected to column chromatography eluted with mixtures of hexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol of increasing polarity to give 86 fractions (200 mL each). Upon washing and recrystallizing with methanol, fractions 13-4 which were eluted from hexane : ethyl acetate (97 : 3) afforded (24S)-24-methyl-5α-lanosta-9(11) and 25-dien-3β-ol (7) (40 mg). Fraction 84 which was eluted from ethyl acetate : methanol (50 : 50) was further washed with methanol to give β-sitosterol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (8) (8 mg). Similarly, compound2 (10 mg), compound4 (7 mg), and β-sitosterol (35 mg) were also obtained from this extract. Chloroform-soluble fraction (40.000 g) was fractionated in a similar manner to obtain 100 fractions (200 mL each) which were combined into major fractions based on their TLC profiles. Compounds1 (20 mg),2(0.79 g),3(16 mg),4(10 mg), and5 (0.97 g) were subsequently obtained. Isolation procedures and spectroscopic data of compounds1 and5have been reported previously [13].


### 2.4. Spectral Data

(24S)-Methyl-5α-lanosta-9(11),25-dien-3β-ol (7); C31H52O, white needle-shaped crystal. Melting point: 180-181°C. [α]D: +67.5(c 0.04, CHCl3). Rf: 0.60 (Hexane-EtOAc, 4 : 1). IR (KBr): 3684, 3402, 2940, 1644, 1098, 888 cm−1. UV/Vis λmax⁡ (CHCl3) nm (log⁡ε): 239.2 (3.837). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): Table 1. EI-MS: m/z(%)=440 (M+, 27), 425 (56), 407 (31), 313 (100), 69 (72), 55(81).Table 1
1H (400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (100 MHz) spectral data of compound 7 (CDCl3).
Position
δ
1H (ppm) (multiplicity, J in Hz)
δ
13C (ppm)
1
1.35 (m), 1.45 (m)
36.1
2
1.67 (m)a, 1.72 (m)
27.8
3
3.22 (dd, 11.9, 4.6)
78.9
4
—
39.1
5
0.87 (d, 6.4)b
52.5
6
1.47 (dd, 12.9, 2.7), 1.68 (m)a
21.4
7
1.30 (m)
28.1
8
2.16 (m)
41.8
9
—
148.5
10
—
39.4
11
5.22 (d, 6.4)
115.0
12
1.91 (br d, 6.4),
37.1
2.08 (br d, 6.4)
13
—
44.3
14
—
47.0
15
1.33 (m)c
33.9
16
1.87 (br d, 4.6)
27.9
17
1.57 (m)
50.9
18
0.64 (s)
14.4
19
1.04 (s)
22.3
20
1.80 (m)
36.0
21
0.87 (d, 6.4)b
18.4
22
1.33 (m)c
34.0
23
1.15 (m), 1.42 (m)
31.4
24
2.10 (m)
41.6
25
—
150.2
26
4.66 (s)
109.4
27
1.64 (s)
18.6
28
0.99 (s)
28.2
29
0.82 (s)
15.7
30
0.73 (s)
18.5
31
1.00 (d, 7.4)
20.2
a,b,cOverlapped signals.


### 2.5. Cytotoxic Assay

The cytotoxic assay was carried out according to the methods described previously [14]. Cytotoxic and proliferation profiles were determined by MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthioazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay whereby cell viability of treated cell population was compared to the control cell population. The cell viability was determined by the formation of blue formazan crystals of MTT in which the crystals were dissolved in DMSO and the absorbance was read with Elisa reader test wavelength of 570 nm and references wavelength of 630 nm. Four human cancer cell lines which included HL-60 (human promyelocytic leukemia), MCF-7 (human breast cancer), HT-29 (human colon cancer), and HeLa (human cervical cancer) cell lines were tested against crude extracts and pure compounds isolated. A graph of percentage of cell viability versus the concentration of crude extracts or pure compounds tested was plotted and the IC50 values were determined. The cytotoxic index used was IC50, which is the concentration that yields 50% inhibition of the treated cell compared with untreated control. Extracts that show IC50<30 μg/mL are considered to have significant cytotoxic activity whilst pure compounds that show cytotoxicity IC50<20 μg/mL are qualified for further cytotoxicity investigations [15].


### 2.6. Antimicrobial Assay

The extracts and isolated compounds were subjected to antimicrobial testing against several microbes including methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureus,Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 60690),Salmonella choleraesuis, andBacillus subtilis(wild) (B29) for antibacterial screening andCandida albicans,Saccharomyces cerevisiae, andAspergillus ochraceus (ATCC 398) for antifungal screening using disc diffusion method as described in [16]. Ampicillin (Gram-negative bacteria) and streptomycin (Gram-positive bacteria) standards were used for each of the bacteria whilst nystatin was used for fungi and yeast as positive control. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated qualitatively by measuring the diameter of the clear inhibition zones around the impregnated discs. The activity index was determined by dividing its zone of inhibition by the standard antibacterial agent. The samples that show activity of >0.5 were considered to exhibit significant antibacterial activity [17].


## 2.1. General Experimental Procedures

Melting points (uncorrected) were determined using Barnstead Electrothermal IA 9100 Series melting points equipment. Optical rotations were measured on a Jasco P-2000 polarimeter equipped with a sodium lamp (589 nm). The IR spectra were recorded using KBr discs on Perkin Elmer FTIR spectrophotometer 1650.1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained on JEOL spectrometer at 500 and 125 MHz and/or 400 and 100 MHz, respectively, with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard. Mass spectra were recorded on Shimadzu model QP 5050 A spectrometer. Ultraviolet spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-1601 spectrophotometer. Separation by column chromatography was carried out by using silica gel (Merck 7749, 7734, and 9385), while silica gel 60 PF254 aluminium sheets were used for TLC analysis.


## 2.2. Plant Material and Cytotoxic Cell Lines

Kaempferia angustifoliawas collected from Java, Indonesia, in 2001. The plant was identified by Dr. Sugeng Riyanto, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, and the voucher specimen (number 16/SR/0601-01) was deposited at the herbarium of the institution. The HL-60 (human promyelocytic leukemia), MCF-7 (human breast cancer), HT-29 (human colon cancer), and HeLa (human cervical cancer) cell lines were obtained from the National Cancer Institute, Maryland, USA. Bacterial strains were originally obtained from American Type Cell Culture Collection (ATCC), USA.


## 2.3. Extraction and Isolation

The finely ground air-dried rhizomes (1.0 kg) were extracted repeatedly with petroleum ether, chloroform, and methanol thrice each for 72 hours. The extracts were filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain petroleum ether (8.40 g), chloroform (7.50 g), and methanol (6.70 g) extracts. The petroleum ether extract was triturated with methanol at room temperature to give a solid product which was then filtered and recrystallized in methanol to yield crotepoxide (2) (16 mg). Brown oil extract (5.80 g) was obtained upon evaporation of the filtrate. The extract was subjected to vacuum column chromatography and eluted stepwise with 100% hexane, hexane-ethyl acetate, ethyl acetate-methanol, and 100% methanol. This afforded boesenboxide (3) (40 mg), 2′-hydroxy-4, 4′, 6′-trimethoxychalcone (4) (26 mg), and β-sitosterol (18 mg). Spectroscopic data of compounds2–4 have been reported previously [12]. Chloroform extract was subjected to column chromatography separation and eluted with mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate to give 23 fractions (200 mL each). Fraction three which was eluted from hexane-ethyl acetate (5 : 5) was purified to afford zeylenol (5) (0.238 g), while fraction four obtained from elution with mixture of hexane-ethyl acetate (3 : 7) was rechromatographed over silica gel to give subfractions 17–19 which were then recrystallized with methanol to afford 6-methylzeylenol (6) (42 mg). Methanol extract was fractionated using column chromatography in a similar manner. Eighteen fractions of 200 mL each were collected. Combination and purification of fractions 14 and 15 from elution with ethyl acetate-methanol (7 : 3) gave sucrose (11 mg). A reinvestigation of the sample (765.0 g) from the same source was conducted by extraction with methanol (3×72 hours) to obtain a dark brown viscous liquid extract which was then partitioned with hexane and water with 10% methanol (1 : 1) to give hexane-soluble fraction (10.60 g) as brown yellowish viscous liquid. The hexane fraction (8.00 g) was subjected to column chromatography eluted with mixtures of hexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol of increasing polarity to give 86 fractions (200 mL each). Upon washing and recrystallizing with methanol, fractions 13-4 which were eluted from hexane : ethyl acetate (97 : 3) afforded (24S)-24-methyl-5α-lanosta-9(11) and 25-dien-3β-ol (7) (40 mg). Fraction 84 which was eluted from ethyl acetate : methanol (50 : 50) was further washed with methanol to give β-sitosterol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (8) (8 mg). Similarly, compound2 (10 mg), compound4 (7 mg), and β-sitosterol (35 mg) were also obtained from this extract. Chloroform-soluble fraction (40.000 g) was fractionated in a similar manner to obtain 100 fractions (200 mL each) which were combined into major fractions based on their TLC profiles. Compounds1 (20 mg),2(0.79 g),3(16 mg),4(10 mg), and5 (0.97 g) were subsequently obtained. Isolation procedures and spectroscopic data of compounds1 and5have been reported previously [13].


## 2.4. Spectral Data

(24S)-Methyl-5α-lanosta-9(11),25-dien-3β-ol (7); C31H52O, white needle-shaped crystal. Melting point: 180-181°C. [α]D: +67.5(c 0.04, CHCl3). Rf: 0.60 (Hexane-EtOAc, 4 : 1). IR (KBr): 3684, 3402, 2940, 1644, 1098, 888 cm−1. UV/Vis λmax⁡ (CHCl3) nm (log⁡ε): 239.2 (3.837). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): Table 1. EI-MS: m/z(%)=440 (M+, 27), 425 (56), 407 (31), 313 (100), 69 (72), 55(81).Table 1
1H (400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (100 MHz) spectral data of compound 7 (CDCl3).
Position
δ
1H (ppm) (multiplicity, J in Hz)
δ
13C (ppm)
1
1.35 (m), 1.45 (m)
36.1
2
1.67 (m)a, 1.72 (m)
27.8
3
3.22 (dd, 11.9, 4.6)
78.9
4
—
39.1
5
0.87 (d, 6.4)b
52.5
6
1.47 (dd, 12.9, 2.7), 1.68 (m)a
21.4
7
1.30 (m)
28.1
8
2.16 (m)
41.8
9
—
148.5
10
—
39.4
11
5.22 (d, 6.4)
115.0
12
1.91 (br d, 6.4),
37.1
2.08 (br d, 6.4)
13
—
44.3
14
—
47.0
15
1.33 (m)c
33.9
16
1.87 (br d, 4.6)
27.9
17
1.57 (m)
50.9
18
0.64 (s)
14.4
19
1.04 (s)
22.3
20
1.80 (m)
36.0
21
0.87 (d, 6.4)b
18.4
22
1.33 (m)c
34.0
23
1.15 (m), 1.42 (m)
31.4
24
2.10 (m)
41.6
25
—
150.2
26
4.66 (s)
109.4
27
1.64 (s)
18.6
28
0.99 (s)
28.2
29
0.82 (s)
15.7
30
0.73 (s)
18.5
31
1.00 (d, 7.4)
20.2
a,b,cOverlapped signals.


## 2.5. Cytotoxic Assay

The cytotoxic assay was carried out according to the methods described previously [14]. Cytotoxic and proliferation profiles were determined by MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthioazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay whereby cell viability of treated cell population was compared to the control cell population. The cell viability was determined by the formation of blue formazan crystals of MTT in which the crystals were dissolved in DMSO and the absorbance was read with Elisa reader test wavelength of 570 nm and references wavelength of 630 nm. Four human cancer cell lines which included HL-60 (human promyelocytic leukemia), MCF-7 (human breast cancer), HT-29 (human colon cancer), and HeLa (human cervical cancer) cell lines were tested against crude extracts and pure compounds isolated. A graph of percentage of cell viability versus the concentration of crude extracts or pure compounds tested was plotted and the IC50 values were determined. The cytotoxic index used was IC50, which is the concentration that yields 50% inhibition of the treated cell compared with untreated control. Extracts that show IC50<30 μg/mL are considered to have significant cytotoxic activity whilst pure compounds that show cytotoxicity IC50<20 μg/mL are qualified for further cytotoxicity investigations [15].


## 2.6. Antimicrobial Assay

The extracts and isolated compounds were subjected to antimicrobial testing against several microbes including methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureus,Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 60690),Salmonella choleraesuis, andBacillus subtilis(wild) (B29) for antibacterial screening andCandida albicans,Saccharomyces cerevisiae, andAspergillus ochraceus (ATCC 398) for antifungal screening using disc diffusion method as described in [16]. Ampicillin (Gram-negative bacteria) and streptomycin (Gram-positive bacteria) standards were used for each of the bacteria whilst nystatin was used for fungi and yeast as positive control. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated qualitatively by measuring the diameter of the clear inhibition zones around the impregnated discs. The activity index was determined by dividing its zone of inhibition by the standard antibacterial agent. The samples that show activity of >0.5 were considered to exhibit significant antibacterial activity [17].


## 3. Results and Discussion

Extraction and separation on the isolates of various extracts ofK. angustifolia led to the isolation and characterization of kaempfolienol (1), crotepoxide (2), boesenboxide (3), 2′-hydroxy-4,4′,6′-trimethoxychalcone (4), zeylenol (5), 6-methylzeylenol (6), (24S)-24-methyl-5α-lanosta-9(11), and 25-dien-3β-ol (7), together with sucrose, β-sitosterol, and its glycoside (8) (Figure 1). To the best of our knowledge, compounds6,7,and8 were isolated for the first time from this plant species. In this report, we describe the spectroscopic data of compound7 as well as cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of the plant constituents. The details of the isolation and characterization of new compound, kaempfolienol (1), zeylenol (5), and its derivatives have been described in our previous report [13]. The compounds were characterized using spectroscopic methods and by comparison with the literature [12, 18–21].Figure 1
Structures of chemical constituents fromKaempferia angustifolia, kaempfolienol (1), crotepoxide (2), boesenboxide (3), 2′-hydroxy-4,4′,6′-trimethoxychalcone (4), zeylenol (5), 6-methylzeylenol (6), (24S)-24-methyl-lanosta-9(11), 25-dien-3β-ol (7), and β-sitosterol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (8).Compound6 (0.042 g) with molecular formula of C22H22O7 was obtained as colourless needle-shaped crystals with melting point of 206-207°C. The FAB-MS spectrum showed the [M+H]+ peak atm/z 399 which corresponds to the molecular formula mentioned. All spectral data were in accordance with the previously reported data of compound6 which is isolated fromUvaria purpurea [14].Compound7 was isolated as white needle-shaped crystal with melting point of 180-181°C. The EI-MS spectrum showed a molecular ion atm/z 440 corresponding to molecular formula of C31H52O, indicative of six degrees of unsaturation. The IR spectrum of (7) indicated the presence of hydroxyl group at 3684 and 3402 cm−1 and olefinic functional group at 1644 cm−1. The 1H NMR spectrum demonstrated signals for six tertiary methyl groups and two secondary methyl groups ranging from δ 0.64 to 1.64, three olefinic protons at δ 4.66 (2H) and 5.22 (1H), and a deshielded methine proton at δ 3.22. These spectral data (Table 1) suggested that compound7 is an unsaturated triterpene alcohol. The 13C NMR experiments including DEPT sorted 31 signals into eight methyls, ten methylenes, six methines, and seven quaternary carbons. The carbon signals for (7) were almost identical to the corresponding carbon signals of reported data for its acetyl derivative [20] except for C-2 to C-4 and the signals for 4β-methyl (C-29). The chemical shifts values of C-3, C-2, and C-4 revealed an upfield shift of 2.0 ppm and a downfield shift of 3.6 and 1.1 ppm, respectively, compared to those of corresponding data of (24S)-24-methyl-5α-lanosta-9(11), 25-dien-3β-acetate [20]. It was thus clear that a hydroxyl group was located at C-3. The precise NMR signals connectivities of (7) were deduced by interpretation of the significant HMBC spectrum and are shown in Figure 2. The olefinic proton at δ 5.22 (d, 6.4 Hz) was correlated with C-10, C-13, and C-8 via 3J correlation and, hence, the double bond was placed at C-9/C-11. Two exomethylene protons which resonated as singlet at δ 4.66 exhibited aw-coupling to the deshielded methyl group at δ 1.64 (H-27) in COSY spectrum and were correlated to C-24, C-25, and C-27 in HMBC spectrum. On the basis of the above results, compound7 was characterized as (24S)-24-methyl-5α-lanosta-9(11), 25-dien-3β-ol. This is the first isolation of the compound as triterpene alcohol since previous literature reported it as its acetyl derivatives isolated fromGlycosmis arborea andNeolitsea aciculata[20, 21].Figure 2
Selected HMBC correlations of (7).Compound8 was obtained as white amorphous powder from the last fraction of hexane extract. The molecular ion peak for compound8 which is suggested to be atm/z 576 could not be traced in the EI-MS spectrum. However, the fragment ions atm/z 414 [M-C6H10O5]+, 396 [M-C6H10O5-H2O]+, 255 [M-C6H10O5-H2O-C10H21(side chain)]+, andm/z 127, 73, and 57 which were obtained from the sugar moiety suggested that compound8 may be monoglycoside with a C29-sterol (m/z 414) aglycone moiety. Further analysis of FAB-MS spectrum demonstrated the molecular ion peak at 599 [M+Na]+ which supported the molecular formula of C35H60O6. From the evidences in spectral data and comparison with reported data [19], compound8was, therefore, established as β-sitosterol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside which was isolated previously fromPrunella vulgaris.The cytotoxic screening results (Table2) suggested the antagonist effect shown by the isolated compounds ofKaempferia angustifolia against HL-60 (human promyelocytic leukemia), MCF-7 (human breast cancer), and HeLa (human cervical cancer) cell lines. All crude extracts tested were inactive against all cell lines tested, with IC50>30 μg/mL. Among the cell lines examined, HL-60 and MCF-7 cells exhibited high sensitivity for all tested compounds (1–8), except for the weak activity shown by compound2 against HL-60 cell and compound5 towards MCF-7. Most of the isolated compounds were inactive against HT-29 (human colon cancer) and HeLa cell lines, with the exception of compound7 which showed strong activity with IC50 of 1.4 μg/mL, which is comparable to standard (5-fluorouracil). Compounds6 and8 also showed moderate inhibition against HeLa cell line. Extracts or isolated compounds, which give IC50<10 μg/mL, were considered to have significant cytotoxic activity [19]. Cytotoxic agents that have been used as standard (positive control) in the screening test were tamoxifen, goniothalamin, and 5-fluorouracil.Table 2
IC50values for pure compounds of K. angustifolia against HL-60, MCF-7, HT-29, and HeLa cell lines.
Samples
*IC50 (μg/mL)
HL-60
MCF-7
HT-29
HeLa
1
24.22 ± 0.30
23.50 ± 1.70
>30
>30
2
>30
18.09 ± 0.20
>30
>30
3
7.77 ± 0.48
19.23 ± 0.69
>30
>30
4
7.49 ± 1.24
6.24 ± 0.57
>30
>30
5
11.65 ± 0.52
>30
>30
>30
6
19.63 ± 0.51
17.63 ± 0.84
—
19.45 ± 0.50
7
6.10 ± 0.22
5.75 ± 1.54
>30
1.42 ± 0.16
8
23.09 ± 3.39
19.83 ± 1.15
>30
23.95 ± 0.36
Standard goniothalamin tamoxifen 5-fluorouracil
1.4
2.8
4.2
1.2
*Values were means ± standard deviation of triplicate analyses.Interestingly, 2′-hydroxy-4,4′,6′-trimethoxychalcone (also known as flavokawain A) (4) appeared to be the most potent compound in cytotoxic screening against both HL-60 and MCF-7 cell lines. A recent publication [22] investigated the antiproliferative effects of this compound against a panel of cancerous cell lines. The results revealed that flavokawain A (4) exhibited similar cytotoxic property against MCF-7 cell line but demonstrated better anticancer effect against HT-29 cell line as compared with our findings, with GI50 values of 17.5 μM (5.5 μg/mL) and 45.3 μM (14.2 μg/mL), respectively. The presence of methoxy substituents and α-methylation of the enone moiety and the presence of 2′ oxygenated substituents are favourable structural requirements for cytotoxic activity due to antimitotic activity while several ring-A methoxylated chalcones exhibited cytotoxic activity by inhibiting tubulin polymerization against a variety of tumor cell lines in the low micromolar range (IC50<50 μM) [23]. Kaempfolienol (1) showed moderate inhibition against HL-60 and MCF-7 cell lines with IC50<30 μg/mL while zeylenol (2) demonstrated moderate inhibition towards HL-60 only with IC50 of 11.6 μg/mL as reported previously [13].As for antimicrobial testing, crude extracts and constituents ofKaempferia angustifolia were assayed against Gram-positiveBacillus subtilis, MRSA, Gram-negativePseudomonas aeruginosa,Salmonella choleraesuis,Candida albicans (yeast), and fungiAspergillus ochraceus andSaccharomyces cerevisiae. However, no activity was detected for all the samples against all microbes tested. Compounds (4) and (6) were not tested towardsC. albicans and fungi due to insufficient amount of samples. The antifungal properties of flavokawain A (4) againstSaccharomyces cerevisiae,Candida albicans,and some other fungi were reported to be inactive [24], and these results complement our findings. Compound4 did not show any inhibition towards Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria tested in this study.The isolation of triterpene fromKaempferia species is unprecedented besides reports on common plant sterols such as β-sitosterol and stigmasterol. The physical properties and spectral data of (24S)-24-methyl-5α-lanosta-9(11), 25-dien-3β-ol (7) are firstly described in this paper. The biotaxonomic distribution of lanostanes is quite restricted [25]. They are abundant in Polyporaceae and other fungi but also appear in some Spermatophyta like Orchidaceae, Pinaceae, and Anacardiaceae. The isolation of lanostane-type triterpene (compound7) from Zingiberaceae has never been reported before and, hence, this finding has contributed to the chemotaxonomic significance.


## 4. Conclusion

The rhizome extracts ofKaempferia angustifoliaRosc. afforded eight compounds (terpene, triterpene, cyclohexane derivatives, chalcone, and glycoside) which showed cytotoxicity against some human cancer cell lines. The structures of the isolates were identified and elucidated based on spectroscopic method and comparison of literature reviews.



---

*Source: 417674-2014-06-25.xml*