# High-Performance Grouting Mortar Based on Mineral Admixtures

Authors: Cong Ma; Yuehu Tan; Erbing Li; Yinsuo Dai; Meng Yang
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

A study on high-performance grouting mortar is reported. The common mortar was modified by mineral admixtures such as gypsum, bauxite, and alunite. The effects of mineral admixtures on the fluidity, setting time, expansion, strength, and other properties of mortar were evaluated experimentally. The microstructure of the modified mortar was characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and mercury intrusion porosimetry. Moreover, the expansive performance and strength of the grouting mortar were verified by anchor pullout test. The results show that the best conditions for gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar are as follows: a water-to-binder ratio of 0.3, a mineral admixture content of ~15%, and a molar ratioK of 2. The ultimate bearing capacity of the gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar anchor increased by 39.6% compared to the common mortar anchor. The gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar has good fluidity, quick-setting, microexpansion, early strength, and high strength performances.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Cementitious grout has widespread application in engineering because of the advantages of good durability, high strength, low cost, and environmental friendliness [1, 2]. In recent years, the preparation and performance of grouting mortar have been extensively studied. The fluidity, water retention, and strength of mortar have been significantly improved by adding a certain amount of silica fume, volcanic ash, and other admixtures [3–8]. The strength and fluidity of grouting mortar can be improved by adding a superplasticizer, but it will shrink the volume of hardened cement pastes [9–12]. Ettringite (AFt) has expansion property. The formation of ettringite and its expansion have been studied using pastes made from an Al-containing compound, gypsum, and tricalcium silicate [13]. After the expansive agent was added, the mortar performance was improved because of some volume expansion. Ettringite-type expansive agents have been widely used [14, 15]. The formation and expansion of ettringite occur rapidly within a few hours [16].However, the current studies on grouting mortar focused on one aspect of performance improvement, without considering the fluidity, setting time, expansion, strength, and economy as a whole. Thus, it is difficult to improve the comprehensive performance of grouting mortar. When an Al-containing mineral reacts with Ca2+ and SO
4
2
-, ettringite (3CaO·Al2O3·3CaSO4·32H2O) is obtained. If gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) and high Al-containing minerals such as bauxite (Al2O3·6H2O) and alunite (KAl3(SO4)2(OH)6) are added to the grouting mortar, the expansion performance and setting speed of mortar are improved by the rapid generation of ettringite as shown in
(1)
Al
2
O
3
·
6
H
2
O
+
3
CaSO
4
·
2
H
2
O
+
3
Ca
OH
2
+
17
H
2
O
=
3
CaO
·
Al
2
O
3
·
3
CaSO
4
·
32
H
2
O
(2)
KAl
3
SO
4
2
OH
6
+
CaSO
4
·
2
H
2
O
+
5
Ca
OH
2
+
24
H
2
O
=
3
CaO
·
Al
2
O
3
·
3
CaSO
4
·
32
H
2
O
+
KOH
+
Al
OH
3The aim of this study is to produce expansive mortars using ettringite. Moreover, the expensive mortar should have the comprehensive performance of good fluidity, quick-setting, early strength, high strength, and economy. In this study, the common mortar was modified by mineral admixtures such as gypsum, bauxite, and alunite. The effects of mineral admixtures on the fluidity, setting time, expansion, strength, and other properties of mortar were studied experimentally. The microstructure of the modified mortar was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Moreover, the expansive performance and strength of the grouting mortar were verified by anchor pullout test.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Mineral admixtures (gypsum, bauxite, and alunite) were obtained from Anhui Province in China. The powder size of the mineral admixtures was 80μm after the grinding and sieving. The chemical compositions of these materials are listed in Table 1. CEM I 42.5 cement was used. The phase composition of Portland cement was as follows: C3S, 56.3%; C2S, 15.5%; C3A, 10.5%; C4AF, 7.1%. Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of gypsum, bauxite, and alunite.Table 1
Chemical composition of materials (wt%).
Materials
SO3
CaO
MgO
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
Na2O + K2O
Loss on ignition
Cement
2.91
63.41
1.67
21.19
5.46
2.33
2.50
1.51
Gypsum
50.43
37.45
3.71
2.13
0.53
0.15
0.24
5.01
Bauxite
1.95
28.31
0.48
5.76
46.96
2.20
1.00
11.10
Alunite
20.54
0.33
0.07
25.82
19.45
4.57
4.67
23.02XRD patterns of mineral admixtures.
(a)
Gypsum
(b)
Bauxite
(c)
AluniteManufactured sand was used; the cement-to-sand ratio of the mortar was 1 : 1. The fineness modulus of sand was 3.5, and the particle-size distribution of the sand is listed in Table2. Naphthalene series superplasticizer was obtained from Jiangsu Bote New Materials Co., Ltd.Table 2
Particle-size distribution of sand.
Sieve size (mm)
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.6
0.3
0.15
Passing (%)
99.74
84.81
38.20
13.96
7.06
0.00


### 2.2. Physical Properties

The physical properties of grouting mortar mainly refer to the fluidity, setting time, and vertical expansion rate. The fluidity of grouting mortar was measured according to the GB/T 2419-2005 standard [17]. The circular truncated cone die was made of metals with a top inside diameter of 100
±
0.5 mm, a bottom inside diameter of 70
±
0.5 mm, and the height of 60
±
0.5 mm. The setting time of grouting mortar was measured according to the GB/T1346-2011 standard [18]. The vertical expansion rate of grouting mortar was measured according to the JC/T 313-2009 standard [19].


### 2.3. Strength Test

The strength of grouting mortar was measured according to the GB/T 17671-1999 standard [20]. The size of the specimen was 40 × 40 × 160 mm. Compressive strength was measured at ages of 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 d under the standard curing conditions (the temperature of curing box was 20
±
1°C, and the relative humidity was >90%).


### 2.4. Microstructure Analysis

According to the requirement of the analysis, hardened mortar pastes of different ages and proportions were prepared. The samples were immersed in anhydrous ethanol (99.7%) to terminate hydration immediately after obtaining the samples. The crystal type, microstructure, and pore size distribution of the samples were analyzed by XRD, SEM, and MIP, respectively.


### 2.5. Anchor Pullout Test

The ultimate pullout force of the anchor was measured by the laboratory simulation of anchor pullout test. A seamless steel pipe with a length of 1000 mm, an inner diameter of 50 mm, and a wall thickness of 4 mm was used instead of an external rock soil mass. After the mortar grouting, the pipe was cured at a temperature of 10–15°C for 14 d. A computer-controlled Steel Twist Thread Tensile Testing Machine (WYGJ) was used as the test equipment, and the maximum load was 600 kN. The stepwise loading method was used. The loading tension per level was set at ~10% of the ultimate bearing capacity of anchor.


## 2.1. Materials

Mineral admixtures (gypsum, bauxite, and alunite) were obtained from Anhui Province in China. The powder size of the mineral admixtures was 80μm after the grinding and sieving. The chemical compositions of these materials are listed in Table 1. CEM I 42.5 cement was used. The phase composition of Portland cement was as follows: C3S, 56.3%; C2S, 15.5%; C3A, 10.5%; C4AF, 7.1%. Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of gypsum, bauxite, and alunite.Table 1
Chemical composition of materials (wt%).
Materials
SO3
CaO
MgO
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
Na2O + K2O
Loss on ignition
Cement
2.91
63.41
1.67
21.19
5.46
2.33
2.50
1.51
Gypsum
50.43
37.45
3.71
2.13
0.53
0.15
0.24
5.01
Bauxite
1.95
28.31
0.48
5.76
46.96
2.20
1.00
11.10
Alunite
20.54
0.33
0.07
25.82
19.45
4.57
4.67
23.02XRD patterns of mineral admixtures.
(a)
Gypsum
(b)
Bauxite
(c)
AluniteManufactured sand was used; the cement-to-sand ratio of the mortar was 1 : 1. The fineness modulus of sand was 3.5, and the particle-size distribution of the sand is listed in Table2. Naphthalene series superplasticizer was obtained from Jiangsu Bote New Materials Co., Ltd.Table 2
Particle-size distribution of sand.
Sieve size (mm)
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.6
0.3
0.15
Passing (%)
99.74
84.81
38.20
13.96
7.06
0.00


## 2.2. Physical Properties

The physical properties of grouting mortar mainly refer to the fluidity, setting time, and vertical expansion rate. The fluidity of grouting mortar was measured according to the GB/T 2419-2005 standard [17]. The circular truncated cone die was made of metals with a top inside diameter of 100
±
0.5 mm, a bottom inside diameter of 70
±
0.5 mm, and the height of 60
±
0.5 mm. The setting time of grouting mortar was measured according to the GB/T1346-2011 standard [18]. The vertical expansion rate of grouting mortar was measured according to the JC/T 313-2009 standard [19].


## 2.3. Strength Test

The strength of grouting mortar was measured according to the GB/T 17671-1999 standard [20]. The size of the specimen was 40 × 40 × 160 mm. Compressive strength was measured at ages of 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 d under the standard curing conditions (the temperature of curing box was 20
±
1°C, and the relative humidity was >90%).


## 2.4. Microstructure Analysis

According to the requirement of the analysis, hardened mortar pastes of different ages and proportions were prepared. The samples were immersed in anhydrous ethanol (99.7%) to terminate hydration immediately after obtaining the samples. The crystal type, microstructure, and pore size distribution of the samples were analyzed by XRD, SEM, and MIP, respectively.


## 2.5. Anchor Pullout Test

The ultimate pullout force of the anchor was measured by the laboratory simulation of anchor pullout test. A seamless steel pipe with a length of 1000 mm, an inner diameter of 50 mm, and a wall thickness of 4 mm was used instead of an external rock soil mass. After the mortar grouting, the pipe was cured at a temperature of 10–15°C for 14 d. A computer-controlled Steel Twist Thread Tensile Testing Machine (WYGJ) was used as the test equipment, and the maximum load was 600 kN. The stepwise loading method was used. The loading tension per level was set at ~10% of the ultimate bearing capacity of anchor.


## 3. Results

The fluidity of a grouting mortar is a precondition ensuring the construction quality of an anchor. Grouting mortar with a good fluidity can fulfill the anchor holes without vibration or vibrating slightly under its own gravity. When the initial fluidity is >260 mm, the grouting mortar has good fluidity. A mortar still has liquidity if 30 min fluidity retention value is >230 mm.The test showed that the setting time shortened significantly after alunite was added to the mortar. In particular, when the addition exceeded 5%, the final setting time was <30 min. The grouting mortar even condensed during the mixing, thus losing the fluidity. It does not meet the requirements of grouting mortar fluidity. Therefore, the gypsum-bauxite series of mortar was mainly investigated. A superplasticizer can improve the fluidity of grouting mortar effectively. The ratio test showed that the mortar fluidity was the best when the content of naphthalene series superplasticizer was 0.8%. In this study, 0.8% of naphthalene series superplasticizer was added to both common grouting mortar and gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar.


### 3.1. Fluidity of Gypsum-Bauxite Grouting Mortar

The main factors affecting the fluidity of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar are the gypsum content, bauxite content, and water-to-binder ratio. Tests were carried out by orthogonal experiment method. The gypsum contents were 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10%. The bauxite contents were the same as the gypsum contents. The water-to-binder ratios were 0.28, 0.3, 0.32, 0.34, and 0.36. Table3 shows the orthogonal factor level table.Table 3
Orthogonal factor level table.
Factor
Experiment level
Gypsum content (A)
Bauxite content (B)
Water-to-binder ratio (C)
1
2%
2%
0.28
2
4%
4%
0.30
3
6%
6%
0.32
4
8%
8%
0.34
5
10%
10%
0.36A total of 25 sets of orthogonal experiments were designed, and the range analysis method was used to analyze the orthogonal experiment results. Table4 shows the orthogonal experimental results, and Table 5 shows the range analysis results.Table 4
Orthogonal experimental results.
No.
A
B
C
3 min
30 min
1
1
1
2
300
275
2 (bleeding)
2
1
5
345
315
3 (bleeding)
3
1
4
340
310
4
4
1
1
265
225
5
5
1
3
315
295
6
1
2
3
325
285
7
2
2
2
290
260
8 (bleeding)
3
2
5
340
293
9 (bleeding)
4
2
4
340
295
10
5
2
1
200
170
11
1
3
1
235
190
12
2
3
3
315
275
13
3
3
2
275
245
14
4
3
5
335
285
15
5
3
4
310
275
16
1
4
4
330
260
17
2
4
1
215
165
18
3
4
3
285
235
19
4
4
2
262
230
20
5
4
5
335
280
21
1
5
5
330
235
22
2
5
4
290
215
23
3
5
1
180
120
24
4
5
3
255
195
25
5
5
2
230
165Table 5
Range analysis results.
Gypsum content
Bauxite content
Water-to-binder ratio
3 min
30 min
3 min
30 min
3 min
30 min
Range
130
60
280
490
590
538The results show that the factors affecting the initial fluidity in a descending order are water-to-binder ratio, bauxite content, and gypsum content. Water-to-binder ratio is the key factor, bauxite content is the important factor, and gypsum content is the general factor. The effects on 30 min fluidity in a descending order are water-to-binder ratio, bauxite content, and gypsum content. However, the difference between the range of bauxite and water-to-binder ratio is slight. Therefore, bauxite content and water-to-binder ratio are the key factors, and gypsum content is the general factor. According to the results of fluidity, water-to-binder ratio should be controlled at ~0.3 to obtain a good fluidity. If the water-to-binder ratio is too large, bleeding and segregation will occur. Conversely, it is difficult to meet the construction requirements if the water-to-binder ratio is too small. By adding mineral admixtures, the fluidity of a grouting mortar can be affected by changing the speed of the hydration reaction, particularly the fluidity retention value for 30 min.


### 3.2. Setting Time of Gypsum-Bauxite Grouting Mortar

To study the effect of gypsum and bauxite on the setting time of grouting mortar, three different amounts were selected to perform the contrast experiment. The results are listed in Table6.Table 6
Effect of gypsum and bauxite on the setting time of grouting mortar.
Number
Mortar (g)
Gypsum (g)
Bauxite (g)
Water-to-binder ratio = 0.3
Initial setting time (min)
Final setting time (min)
1
1400
0
0
215
301
2
1400
117
0
251
357
3
1400
0
48.6
55
86As shown in Table6, the setting time of grouting mortar increased after the addition of gypsum. Conversely, the setting time decreased after the addition of bauxite, and the decrease was larger. The addition of gypsum increased the previous concentration of SO
4
2
-, which reacted with the cement hydration products and generated ettringite. Ettringite covered the surface of cement clinker particles to form a compact film, thus hindering further hydration of cement particles. Gypsum shows a significant retarding effect. Bauxite contains more active ingredients such as Al2O3 which reacts with Ca(OH)2 in water to generate hydrated calcium aluminate. Simultaneously, Ca(OH)2 in the hydration products of cement clinker is consumed, and the hydration reaction is promoted. Bauxite shows a significant coagulating effect.The content of mineral admixture and molar ratioK (K = SO3/Al2O3) significantly affected the setting time of grouting mortar. The total content of mineral admixture and value of K were adjusted to perform the contrast experiment. The water-to-binder ratio was 0.3. The results are shown in Table 7.Table 7
Effect of mineral content and molar ratioK on setting time of grouting mortar.
Number
Mortar (g)
Total content (%)
Water (mL)
Cement content (%)
K = 3
K = 1
Initial setting time (min)
Final setting time (min)
Initial setting time (min)
Final setting time (min)
1
1500
5
236.3
41.0
130
175
90
153
2
1500
7.5
241.9
39.8
93
164
70
135
3
1500
10
247.5
38.6
67
124
67
119
4
1500
12.5
253.1
37.4
54
112
41
76
5
1500
15
258.8
36.2
46
86
31
57
6
1500
17.5
264.4
35.1
46
78
27
53
7
1500
20
270.0
33.9
36
66
25
48As shown in Table7, both the initial and final setting times of grouting mortar decreased with the increase in the total content of mineral admixture. To meet the requirements of the fluidity of grouting mortar, the total content of mineral admixture should be controlled within 15%. When K is 1, the setting time decreased significantly. The reduction is more prominent than that when K is 3. In the hydration reaction, the theoretical value of K is 3. If K < 3, bauxite is still surplus after gypsum is completely consumed by the reaction; that is, the amount of gypsum is insufficient. When K changed from 1 to 3, the content of gypsum increased, thus increasing the retarding action of gypsum with the increase in the setting time. The results show that the total content of mineral admixture should be controlled within 15% to obtain a better setting time. Moreover, the setting time of grouting mortar was the shortest when K was 1.


### 3.3. Expansive Performance of Gypsum-Bauxite Grouting Mortar

Gypsum and bauxite significantly affected the expansive performance of grouting mortar. Expansive performance tests were carried out by adding different amounts of gypsum or bauxite to grouting mortar. The results are shown in Figures2 and 3.Figure 2
Effect of gypsum content on expansion rate.Figure 3
Effect of bauxite content on expansion rate.Figure2 shows that the vertical expansion rate increased after the hardening of grouting mortar with the increase in gypsum content. The vertical volume expansion rate reached 0.05% when the gypsum content was 9%. Moreover, the gypsum content affected the stability time of the expansion. When the content was 3%, the stability time is at ~10 d. When the content was 9%, a certain degree of vertical expansion growth was observed. The greater the gypsum content, the longer the volume stability time. The addition of gypsum provided a large amount of  SO
4
2
- for the hydration reaction, thus affecting the yield and speed of ettringite directly. In a macroscopic view, this indicates the value of the expansion ratio and the length of the volume stability time.Figure3 shows that the change in vertical expansion rate is not clear after the hardening of grouting mortar with the addition of bauxite. The late vertical expansion rate changed slightly, particularly when the bauxite content was >4%. This is because the addition of bauxite accelerated the speed of hydration reaction, thus affecting the production speed of ettringite, but not the yields. When the amount of gypsum was insufficient, ettringite reacted with the cement hydration products and generated monosulfoaluminate (AFm, 3CaO·Al2O3·CaSO4·12H2O), which does not expand the volume. Therefore, the late vertical expansion rate was basically the same when the bauxite contents were 4% and 6%.The content of mineral admixture and molar ratioK (K = SO3/Al2O3) significantly affected the vertical expansion rate of grouting mortar. The total content of mineral admixture and value of K were adjusted to perform the contrast experiment. The water-to-binder ratio was 0.3. The results are shown in Figures 4 and 5.Figure 4
Effect of the total content on expansion rate (K = 1).Figure 5
Effect of the total content on expansion rate (K = 3).Figures4 and 5 show that the vertical expansion rate increased after the hardening of grouting mortar with the increase in the total content of mineral admixture. When the molar ratio K increased from 1 to 3, not only the vertical expansion rate increased, but also the amount of expansion increased clearly under the same total content condition.WhenK is 1, the amount of gypsum is insufficient. Ettringite continues to react with the cement hydration products and generates AFm which does not expand the volume. Therefore, the change in vertical expansion rate was not obvious with the increase in the total content of mineral admixture. When K is 3, the amount of gypsum is sufficient for the hydration reaction. Ettringite can be generated stably. The results show that the total content of mineral admixture should be controlled at ~15%, in which case, the hardened mortar has a good expansion amount in the early days and the late expansion has a better stability. Moreover, the grouting mortar exhibited the best expansive performance when K was 3.


### 3.4. Strength of Gypsum-Bauxite Grouting Mortar

According to the test results of fluidity, setting time, and expansion, the water-to-binder ratio of gypsum–bauxite grouting mortar should be 0.3, and the content of mineral admixture should be controlled at ~15%. Considering the effects on setting time and expansive performance, the molar ratioK was maintained between 2 and 2.5. The strength tests were carried out according to the data shown in Table 8. The results of fluidity tests show that two groups of specimens met the requirements of fluidity. The results of expansive performance tests show that vertical expansion rate of the two groups of samples was stabilized at ~0.2%.Table 8
Mineral content and setting time of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar.
Mortar(g)
Gypsum(g)
Bauxite(g)
Total content/%
K
Cement content (%)
Initial setting time (min)
Final setting time (min)
Common mortar
1400
0
0
0
/
43.4
245
301
A1
1400
117
59.7
12.6
2.5
37.4
66
113
A2
1400
117
74.6
13.7
2
36.9
51
75For the two groups of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar samples, strength tests were carried out according to the data shown in Table8, and the results were compared to those of the common grouting mortar. The results are shown in Table 9.Table 9
Strength of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar.
Flexural strength (MPa)
Compressive strength (MPa)
1 d
3 d
7 d
14 d
28 d
1 d
3 d
7 d
14 d
28 d
Common mortar
4.1
7.95
8.31
8.95
9.48
15.5
37.3
50.9
60.1
64.4
A1
4.17
6.06
6.65
7.3
9.4
16.6
34.5
46.9
61.5
63.1
A2
3.84
5.92
7.42
8.29
9.9
14.3
34.6
44.3
59.3
68.1Table9 shows that the compressive strengths of 1 and 3 d are approximately 14 MPa and 34 MPa, respectively. The compressive strength of 28 d is >60 MPa. The compressive strength of 3 d is 50% higher than that of 28 d. Thus, the gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar has the characteristics of early strength and high strength. The addition of gypsum and bauxite slightly affected the strength of the mortar. The early strength is slightly lower, and the latter strength is almost the same as that of the common mortar. Next, the microstructure analysis of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar is reported.


### 3.5. Microstructure Analysis

The XRD pattern was analyzed using A2 as an example. The results are shown in Figure6.XRD patterns of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar.
(a)
1 d
(b)
3 d
(c)
28 dFigure6 shows that the amount of gypsum and bauxite in the hardened pastes decreased rapidly with aging, participating in the hydration reaction of cement clinker. Moreover, with aging, the amount of ettringite (AFt) increased. In general, the strength value of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar increases continually with the increase in the hydration products.The SEM results of the gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar (A2 sample) are shown in Figure7.SEM images of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar.
(a)
3 d
(b)
28 dFigure7 shows a large number of thin sheets of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) at 3 d, filling a large amount of hydration products such as ettringite in the pores. However, the porosity is not high on the whole. At 28 d, several columnar and acicular ettringite were observed, overlapping each other intricately to form a relatively complete skeletal system. This contributes significantly to the strength of hardened paste, affecting the latter strength obviously.The strength of a mortar has a close relationship with the size and number of pores. The pore diameter distribution of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar (A2 sample) was analyzed by MIP and compared to that of the common grouting mortar. The results are shown in Figure8.Figure 8
Pore diameter distribution of hardened pastes (T = 28 d).Figure8 shows that the pore diameter of the common mortar is mainly >100 μm, whereas the pore diameter of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar (A2 sample) is between 10 and 100 μm at 28 d. Simultaneously, the pore structure results show that the total porosity of the common mortar was 3.49%, whereas that of the gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar (A2 sample) was 1.84% at 28 d. Thus, the total porosity significantly reduced, clearly indicating the effect of mineral admixture and the improvement in strength.The above tests show that the gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar (A2 sample) has the following properties.(
1
) Good fluidity: the initial fluidity is >260 mm, and the 30 min fluidity retention value is >230 mm. (
2
) Short setting time: the initial setting time is controlled at ~1 h, and the final setting time is controlled within 2 h. (
3
) Expansive performance: the hardened mortar has a good expansion amount in the early days, and the late expansion is stabilized at ~0.2%. (
4
) Early strength and high strength: the compressive strengths of 1 d and 3 d are approximately 14 MPa and 34 MPa, respectively. The compressive strength of 28 d is >60 MPa.


### 3.6. Pullout Force of Anchor

To study the effect of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar on the pullout force of anchor, A2 was used as an example to perform the pullout test of anchor. The pullout test of the common grouting mortar without mineral admixture was conducted for comparison. The results are shown in Figure9. The damage of anchor is shown in Figure 10.Figure 9
Load-displacement curves of pullout tests.Figure 10
Damage of anchor.Figure9 shows that the ultimate bearing capacity of a 1 m long simulation anchor for A2 sample is 74 kN, whereas that of a 1 m long simulation anchor using the common grouting mortar is only 53 kN. The ultimate bearing capacity increased by 39.6%. Both the load-displacement curves are relatively flat with a smaller slope, and the pullout force increased slowly.The anchor forces mainly comprise the cohesion and friction between anchorage body and rock; therefore, the strength of anchoring material can directly affect the anchor force [21]. Moreover, the modest expansion significantly benefits the anchor force. When the anchor is damaged, the anchorage body is pulled out from the pipe, and the mortar remains intact. The results show that the strength of the mortar is good, and the anchor damage occurred between the anchorage body and steel tube wall. The anchor failed because the cohesion and friction between anchorage body and steel tube wall are less than that of the anchor tension. Because of the addition of gypsum and bauxite, the mortar had modest volume expansion, thus increasing the stress between anchoring body and steel tube wall. The cohesion and friction were better than those of the ordinary grouting material. Therefore, the pullout force of anchor increased. The result shows that the gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar has a higher ultimate bearing capacity than the common mortar. The ultimate bearing capacity increased by 39.6%.


## 3.1. Fluidity of Gypsum-Bauxite Grouting Mortar

The main factors affecting the fluidity of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar are the gypsum content, bauxite content, and water-to-binder ratio. Tests were carried out by orthogonal experiment method. The gypsum contents were 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10%. The bauxite contents were the same as the gypsum contents. The water-to-binder ratios were 0.28, 0.3, 0.32, 0.34, and 0.36. Table3 shows the orthogonal factor level table.Table 3
Orthogonal factor level table.
Factor
Experiment level
Gypsum content (A)
Bauxite content (B)
Water-to-binder ratio (C)
1
2%
2%
0.28
2
4%
4%
0.30
3
6%
6%
0.32
4
8%
8%
0.34
5
10%
10%
0.36A total of 25 sets of orthogonal experiments were designed, and the range analysis method was used to analyze the orthogonal experiment results. Table4 shows the orthogonal experimental results, and Table 5 shows the range analysis results.Table 4
Orthogonal experimental results.
No.
A
B
C
3 min
30 min
1
1
1
2
300
275
2 (bleeding)
2
1
5
345
315
3 (bleeding)
3
1
4
340
310
4
4
1
1
265
225
5
5
1
3
315
295
6
1
2
3
325
285
7
2
2
2
290
260
8 (bleeding)
3
2
5
340
293
9 (bleeding)
4
2
4
340
295
10
5
2
1
200
170
11
1
3
1
235
190
12
2
3
3
315
275
13
3
3
2
275
245
14
4
3
5
335
285
15
5
3
4
310
275
16
1
4
4
330
260
17
2
4
1
215
165
18
3
4
3
285
235
19
4
4
2
262
230
20
5
4
5
335
280
21
1
5
5
330
235
22
2
5
4
290
215
23
3
5
1
180
120
24
4
5
3
255
195
25
5
5
2
230
165Table 5
Range analysis results.
Gypsum content
Bauxite content
Water-to-binder ratio
3 min
30 min
3 min
30 min
3 min
30 min
Range
130
60
280
490
590
538The results show that the factors affecting the initial fluidity in a descending order are water-to-binder ratio, bauxite content, and gypsum content. Water-to-binder ratio is the key factor, bauxite content is the important factor, and gypsum content is the general factor. The effects on 30 min fluidity in a descending order are water-to-binder ratio, bauxite content, and gypsum content. However, the difference between the range of bauxite and water-to-binder ratio is slight. Therefore, bauxite content and water-to-binder ratio are the key factors, and gypsum content is the general factor. According to the results of fluidity, water-to-binder ratio should be controlled at ~0.3 to obtain a good fluidity. If the water-to-binder ratio is too large, bleeding and segregation will occur. Conversely, it is difficult to meet the construction requirements if the water-to-binder ratio is too small. By adding mineral admixtures, the fluidity of a grouting mortar can be affected by changing the speed of the hydration reaction, particularly the fluidity retention value for 30 min.


## 3.2. Setting Time of Gypsum-Bauxite Grouting Mortar

To study the effect of gypsum and bauxite on the setting time of grouting mortar, three different amounts were selected to perform the contrast experiment. The results are listed in Table6.Table 6
Effect of gypsum and bauxite on the setting time of grouting mortar.
Number
Mortar (g)
Gypsum (g)
Bauxite (g)
Water-to-binder ratio = 0.3
Initial setting time (min)
Final setting time (min)
1
1400
0
0
215
301
2
1400
117
0
251
357
3
1400
0
48.6
55
86As shown in Table6, the setting time of grouting mortar increased after the addition of gypsum. Conversely, the setting time decreased after the addition of bauxite, and the decrease was larger. The addition of gypsum increased the previous concentration of SO
4
2
-, which reacted with the cement hydration products and generated ettringite. Ettringite covered the surface of cement clinker particles to form a compact film, thus hindering further hydration of cement particles. Gypsum shows a significant retarding effect. Bauxite contains more active ingredients such as Al2O3 which reacts with Ca(OH)2 in water to generate hydrated calcium aluminate. Simultaneously, Ca(OH)2 in the hydration products of cement clinker is consumed, and the hydration reaction is promoted. Bauxite shows a significant coagulating effect.The content of mineral admixture and molar ratioK (K = SO3/Al2O3) significantly affected the setting time of grouting mortar. The total content of mineral admixture and value of K were adjusted to perform the contrast experiment. The water-to-binder ratio was 0.3. The results are shown in Table 7.Table 7
Effect of mineral content and molar ratioK on setting time of grouting mortar.
Number
Mortar (g)
Total content (%)
Water (mL)
Cement content (%)
K = 3
K = 1
Initial setting time (min)
Final setting time (min)
Initial setting time (min)
Final setting time (min)
1
1500
5
236.3
41.0
130
175
90
153
2
1500
7.5
241.9
39.8
93
164
70
135
3
1500
10
247.5
38.6
67
124
67
119
4
1500
12.5
253.1
37.4
54
112
41
76
5
1500
15
258.8
36.2
46
86
31
57
6
1500
17.5
264.4
35.1
46
78
27
53
7
1500
20
270.0
33.9
36
66
25
48As shown in Table7, both the initial and final setting times of grouting mortar decreased with the increase in the total content of mineral admixture. To meet the requirements of the fluidity of grouting mortar, the total content of mineral admixture should be controlled within 15%. When K is 1, the setting time decreased significantly. The reduction is more prominent than that when K is 3. In the hydration reaction, the theoretical value of K is 3. If K < 3, bauxite is still surplus after gypsum is completely consumed by the reaction; that is, the amount of gypsum is insufficient. When K changed from 1 to 3, the content of gypsum increased, thus increasing the retarding action of gypsum with the increase in the setting time. The results show that the total content of mineral admixture should be controlled within 15% to obtain a better setting time. Moreover, the setting time of grouting mortar was the shortest when K was 1.


## 3.3. Expansive Performance of Gypsum-Bauxite Grouting Mortar

Gypsum and bauxite significantly affected the expansive performance of grouting mortar. Expansive performance tests were carried out by adding different amounts of gypsum or bauxite to grouting mortar. The results are shown in Figures2 and 3.Figure 2
Effect of gypsum content on expansion rate.Figure 3
Effect of bauxite content on expansion rate.Figure2 shows that the vertical expansion rate increased after the hardening of grouting mortar with the increase in gypsum content. The vertical volume expansion rate reached 0.05% when the gypsum content was 9%. Moreover, the gypsum content affected the stability time of the expansion. When the content was 3%, the stability time is at ~10 d. When the content was 9%, a certain degree of vertical expansion growth was observed. The greater the gypsum content, the longer the volume stability time. The addition of gypsum provided a large amount of  SO
4
2
- for the hydration reaction, thus affecting the yield and speed of ettringite directly. In a macroscopic view, this indicates the value of the expansion ratio and the length of the volume stability time.Figure3 shows that the change in vertical expansion rate is not clear after the hardening of grouting mortar with the addition of bauxite. The late vertical expansion rate changed slightly, particularly when the bauxite content was >4%. This is because the addition of bauxite accelerated the speed of hydration reaction, thus affecting the production speed of ettringite, but not the yields. When the amount of gypsum was insufficient, ettringite reacted with the cement hydration products and generated monosulfoaluminate (AFm, 3CaO·Al2O3·CaSO4·12H2O), which does not expand the volume. Therefore, the late vertical expansion rate was basically the same when the bauxite contents were 4% and 6%.The content of mineral admixture and molar ratioK (K = SO3/Al2O3) significantly affected the vertical expansion rate of grouting mortar. The total content of mineral admixture and value of K were adjusted to perform the contrast experiment. The water-to-binder ratio was 0.3. The results are shown in Figures 4 and 5.Figure 4
Effect of the total content on expansion rate (K = 1).Figure 5
Effect of the total content on expansion rate (K = 3).Figures4 and 5 show that the vertical expansion rate increased after the hardening of grouting mortar with the increase in the total content of mineral admixture. When the molar ratio K increased from 1 to 3, not only the vertical expansion rate increased, but also the amount of expansion increased clearly under the same total content condition.WhenK is 1, the amount of gypsum is insufficient. Ettringite continues to react with the cement hydration products and generates AFm which does not expand the volume. Therefore, the change in vertical expansion rate was not obvious with the increase in the total content of mineral admixture. When K is 3, the amount of gypsum is sufficient for the hydration reaction. Ettringite can be generated stably. The results show that the total content of mineral admixture should be controlled at ~15%, in which case, the hardened mortar has a good expansion amount in the early days and the late expansion has a better stability. Moreover, the grouting mortar exhibited the best expansive performance when K was 3.


## 3.4. Strength of Gypsum-Bauxite Grouting Mortar

According to the test results of fluidity, setting time, and expansion, the water-to-binder ratio of gypsum–bauxite grouting mortar should be 0.3, and the content of mineral admixture should be controlled at ~15%. Considering the effects on setting time and expansive performance, the molar ratioK was maintained between 2 and 2.5. The strength tests were carried out according to the data shown in Table 8. The results of fluidity tests show that two groups of specimens met the requirements of fluidity. The results of expansive performance tests show that vertical expansion rate of the two groups of samples was stabilized at ~0.2%.Table 8
Mineral content and setting time of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar.
Mortar(g)
Gypsum(g)
Bauxite(g)
Total content/%
K
Cement content (%)
Initial setting time (min)
Final setting time (min)
Common mortar
1400
0
0
0
/
43.4
245
301
A1
1400
117
59.7
12.6
2.5
37.4
66
113
A2
1400
117
74.6
13.7
2
36.9
51
75For the two groups of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar samples, strength tests were carried out according to the data shown in Table8, and the results were compared to those of the common grouting mortar. The results are shown in Table 9.Table 9
Strength of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar.
Flexural strength (MPa)
Compressive strength (MPa)
1 d
3 d
7 d
14 d
28 d
1 d
3 d
7 d
14 d
28 d
Common mortar
4.1
7.95
8.31
8.95
9.48
15.5
37.3
50.9
60.1
64.4
A1
4.17
6.06
6.65
7.3
9.4
16.6
34.5
46.9
61.5
63.1
A2
3.84
5.92
7.42
8.29
9.9
14.3
34.6
44.3
59.3
68.1Table9 shows that the compressive strengths of 1 and 3 d are approximately 14 MPa and 34 MPa, respectively. The compressive strength of 28 d is >60 MPa. The compressive strength of 3 d is 50% higher than that of 28 d. Thus, the gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar has the characteristics of early strength and high strength. The addition of gypsum and bauxite slightly affected the strength of the mortar. The early strength is slightly lower, and the latter strength is almost the same as that of the common mortar. Next, the microstructure analysis of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar is reported.


## 3.5. Microstructure Analysis

The XRD pattern was analyzed using A2 as an example. The results are shown in Figure6.XRD patterns of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar.
(a)
1 d
(b)
3 d
(c)
28 dFigure6 shows that the amount of gypsum and bauxite in the hardened pastes decreased rapidly with aging, participating in the hydration reaction of cement clinker. Moreover, with aging, the amount of ettringite (AFt) increased. In general, the strength value of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar increases continually with the increase in the hydration products.The SEM results of the gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar (A2 sample) are shown in Figure7.SEM images of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar.
(a)
3 d
(b)
28 dFigure7 shows a large number of thin sheets of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) at 3 d, filling a large amount of hydration products such as ettringite in the pores. However, the porosity is not high on the whole. At 28 d, several columnar and acicular ettringite were observed, overlapping each other intricately to form a relatively complete skeletal system. This contributes significantly to the strength of hardened paste, affecting the latter strength obviously.The strength of a mortar has a close relationship with the size and number of pores. The pore diameter distribution of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar (A2 sample) was analyzed by MIP and compared to that of the common grouting mortar. The results are shown in Figure8.Figure 8
Pore diameter distribution of hardened pastes (T = 28 d).Figure8 shows that the pore diameter of the common mortar is mainly >100 μm, whereas the pore diameter of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar (A2 sample) is between 10 and 100 μm at 28 d. Simultaneously, the pore structure results show that the total porosity of the common mortar was 3.49%, whereas that of the gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar (A2 sample) was 1.84% at 28 d. Thus, the total porosity significantly reduced, clearly indicating the effect of mineral admixture and the improvement in strength.The above tests show that the gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar (A2 sample) has the following properties.(
1
) Good fluidity: the initial fluidity is >260 mm, and the 30 min fluidity retention value is >230 mm. (
2
) Short setting time: the initial setting time is controlled at ~1 h, and the final setting time is controlled within 2 h. (
3
) Expansive performance: the hardened mortar has a good expansion amount in the early days, and the late expansion is stabilized at ~0.2%. (
4
) Early strength and high strength: the compressive strengths of 1 d and 3 d are approximately 14 MPa and 34 MPa, respectively. The compressive strength of 28 d is >60 MPa.


## 3.6. Pullout Force of Anchor

To study the effect of gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar on the pullout force of anchor, A2 was used as an example to perform the pullout test of anchor. The pullout test of the common grouting mortar without mineral admixture was conducted for comparison. The results are shown in Figure9. The damage of anchor is shown in Figure 10.Figure 9
Load-displacement curves of pullout tests.Figure 10
Damage of anchor.Figure9 shows that the ultimate bearing capacity of a 1 m long simulation anchor for A2 sample is 74 kN, whereas that of a 1 m long simulation anchor using the common grouting mortar is only 53 kN. The ultimate bearing capacity increased by 39.6%. Both the load-displacement curves are relatively flat with a smaller slope, and the pullout force increased slowly.The anchor forces mainly comprise the cohesion and friction between anchorage body and rock; therefore, the strength of anchoring material can directly affect the anchor force [21]. Moreover, the modest expansion significantly benefits the anchor force. When the anchor is damaged, the anchorage body is pulled out from the pipe, and the mortar remains intact. The results show that the strength of the mortar is good, and the anchor damage occurred between the anchorage body and steel tube wall. The anchor failed because the cohesion and friction between anchorage body and steel tube wall are less than that of the anchor tension. Because of the addition of gypsum and bauxite, the mortar had modest volume expansion, thus increasing the stress between anchoring body and steel tube wall. The cohesion and friction were better than those of the ordinary grouting material. Therefore, the pullout force of anchor increased. The result shows that the gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar has a higher ultimate bearing capacity than the common mortar. The ultimate bearing capacity increased by 39.6%.


## 4. Discussion

The tests revealed that the setting time shortened significantly after alunite was added to the mortar, particularly when the addition exceeded 5%. The grouting mortar even condensed during the mixing, thus losing the fluidity. This does not meet the requirements of grouting mortar fluidity. This characteristic of alunite makes it possible to use alunite grouting mortar in rapid repair and planting-bar anchorage.Alunite, KAl3(SO4)2(OH)6 is not soluble in water in its original form. Alunite additive cements harden rapidly and have high strength, because alunite is used as an accelerator in cement production [22]. When alunite is added to Portland cement, the hardening time decreases, while the expansion increases. It is also possible to achieve concrete with a high early strength by adding alunite to cement [23]. However, alunite mortar has been rarely studied. Katsioti et al. [24] studied the utilization of jarosite/alunite residue for the restoration of mortars, and the jarosite/alunite residue improved the mechanical behavior of the resulting mortars. In this section, the effects of alunite content on the setting time, expansion, and strength of grouting mortar are reported.To study the effect of alunite on the setting time of grouting mortar, three different amounts were selected to perform the contrast experiment. The water-to-binder ratio was 0.3, and the naphthalene series superplasticizer was not used. The results are shown in Table10.Table 10
Effect of alunite on the setting time of grouting mortar.
Number
Mortar(g)
Content(%)
Alunite(g)
Initial setting time (min)
Final setting time (min)
K1
1400
3.6
50
42
92
K2
1400
7.1
100
6
26
K3
1400
14.2
200
4
8As shown in Table10, both the initial and final setting times of grouting mortar reduced significantly with the increase in the alunite content. Alunite provides both Al3+ and SO
4
2
- for the hydration reaction, thus rapidly producing large amounts of ettringite and promoting the rapid condensation of mortar. To study the effect of alunite on the expansive performance of mortar, expansive performance tests (K2 and K3) were conducted. The results are shown in Figure 11.Figure 11
Effect of alunite content on expansion rate.Figure11 shows that the hardened mortar underwent a certain volume expansion with the addition of alunite in the early days. The vertical expansion rate increased with the increase in alunite content. However, the hardened mortar shrank after 15 d. Alunite provides both Al2O3 and SO3 for the hydration reaction, thus rapidly producing large amounts of ettringite in the early days. Therefore, the hardened mortar had a certain volume expansion. However, the hydration reaction consumes large amounts of water simultaneously, and the value of SO3/Al2O3 is ~1 in alunite. The amount of SO3 is relatively insufficient, and the ettringite continues to react with the cement hydration products and generates AFm which cannot expand the volume. Therefore, the hardened mortar shrank after 15 d.The strength tests were carried out using K2 as an example. The results show that alunite mortar has obvious characteristics of early strength. The compressive strengths of 0.5, 1, and 3 d are approximately 14.8 MPa, 26.6 Mpa, and 41.1 MPa, respectively.In summary, alunite mortar has the following characteristics: very short setting time, early volume expansion, and significant early strength. Therefore, alunite mortar can be used in rapid repair and planting-bar anchorage.


## 5. Conclusions

In this study, a gypsum-bauxite high-performance grouting mortar was developed. The mortar has the following properties.(
1
) Good fluidity: the initial fluidity value is >260 mm, and the 30 min fluidity retention value is >230 mm. (
2
) Short setting time: the initial setting time is controlled at ~1 h, and the final setting time is controlled within 2 h. (
3
) Expansive performance: the hardened mortar has a good expansion amount in the early days, and late expansion is stabilized at ~0.2%. (
4
) Early strength and high strength: the compressive strengths of 1 d and 3 d are approximately 14 MPa and 34 MPa, respectively. The compressive strength of 28 d is >60 MPa. The best conditions for gypsum-bauxite grouting mortar are as follows: a water-to-binder ratio is 0.3, a mineral admixture content of ~15%, and a molar ratio K of 2.The expansive performance and strength of the grouting mortar were verified by anchor pullout test. The results show that gypsum–bauxite grouting mortar has a higher ultimate bearing capacity than the common mortar. The ultimate bearing capacity increased by 39.6%. Alunite mortar has the following characteristics: very short setting time, early volume expansion, and significant early strength; thus, it can be used in rapid repair and planting-bar anchorage.



---

*Source: 425456-2015-02-23.xml*