# Miniaturized CPW-Fed Triband Antenna with Asymmetric Ring for WLAN/WiMAX Applications

Authors: Shanshan Huang; Jun Li; Jianzhong Zhao
Journal: Journal of Computer Networks and Communications
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

A compact CPW-fed triband slot antenna for WLAN/WiMAX applications is proposed. The proposed antenna is formed by an asymmetric ring, an inverted L-strip, and a straight strip. By employing these structures, the antenna can generate three operation bands with compact size and simple structure. The measured and simulated results show the presented antenna has impedance bandwidths of 100 MHz (2.39–2.49 GHz), 360 MHz (3.36–3.72 GHz), and 760 MHz (5.13–5.89 GHz), which covers both WLAN in the 2.4/5.2 GHz bands and WiMAX in the 3.5/5.5 GHz bands. The antenna is successfully simulated and measured, showing triple bands can be obtained by using three different radiators and also indicating that the proposed antenna is suitable for the WiMAX/WLAN applications.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent years, with the rapid development of WLAN/WiMAX systems, the demand for antennas with small size, low cost, multifrequency operation capabilities, and high efficiency has increased. In order to meet WLAN/WiMAX applications, a broadband antenna or a multiband antenna covering all the WLAN/WiMAX operation bands is a candidate. However the multiband antenna is more attractive than broadband antenna, because the broadband antennas contain dispensable bands in WLAN/WiMAX system. Many multiband antennas have been proposed for WLAN or WiMAX applications such as [1–15]. For example, a CPW-fed antenna [1] composed of U-shaped and triangular radiating elements can generate two bands to meet the requirements for WLAN/WiMAX systems. The proposed antenna in [2] is coupled-fed through L-shaped and E-shaped resonant elements to obtain two operation bands. Although the antennas in [1–4] can yield two widebands for WLAN or WiMAX operations, there are still some drawbacks to be improved. Triband antenna only for WiMAX application is obtained by a coupled dual-U-shaped radiator in [5]. Ultrawideband (UWB) antenna with triple band-notched characteristics is presented in [6]. In [9] a microstrip-fed monopole antenna with a fork-shaped strip is proposed to meet WLAN and WiMAX applications. The antennas in [5–11] have some disadvantages. For instance, designs procedures of the proposed antennas in [6–8] are complex, antenna presented in [6] cannot cover the frequency band 2.4–2.48-GHz, and antenna in [8] is only capable of WLAN operation which limits the numbers of operation modes in portable equipment. The dimensions of antennas in [9, 10] are with large size of 34.5 × 18 × 1 mm3 [9], 30 × 20 × 0.8 mm3 [10], and 30 × 18 × 1.6 mm3 [11] which may limit their integration with future miniaturized wireless communication systems.In this paper, we present the design, fabrication, and characterization of a novel and compact CPW-fed triband antenna. The proposed antenna consists of an asymmetric ring, an inverted L-strip, and a straight strip in order to drive three different resonant modes. According to the sizes of these three elements, three distinct bands can be obtained, respectively. The dimension of the proposed antenna is only 22 × 20 × 1.6 mm3. Measured results demonstrate that the antenna can effectively cover three impedance bandwidths of 100 MHz (2.39–2.49 GHz), 360 MHz (3.36–3.72 GHz), and 760 MHz (5.13–5.89 GHz), which is suitable for 2.4/5.2/5.8 GHz WLAN bands and 3.5/5.5 GHz WiMAX bands. The simulation works of the proposed antenna are carried out by using a full-wave electromagnetic (EM) simulator ANSYS HFSS V13.


## 2. Design Procedure

To meet the three operation bands for WLAN/WiMAX applications, the design procedure of the proposed triband antenna is illustrated in Figure1. First, an asymmetric ring is designed (Antenna 1), which is composed of two resonant elements. Then, an inverted L-strip is attached to the asymmetric ring as shown in Figure 1, Antenna 2. The inverted L-strip and the left side of the asymmetric ring can yield the lower band. Finally, a straight strip is added to Antenna 2, as depicted in Figure 1, Antenna 3, to generate the third band. Thus, the proposed triband antenna (Antenna 3) for WLAN/WiMAX communication systems is designed. Figure 2 shows the simulated return losses of Antenna 1, Antenna 2, and Antenna 3.Geometry of Antenna 1, Antenna 2, and Antenna 3.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 2
Simulated|
S
11
| of Antenna 1, Antenna 2, and Antenna 3.The configuration of the proposed triband antenna (i.e., Antenna 3 in Figure1) is exhibited in Figure 3(a), and the photograph of the fabricated prototype antenna is shown in Figure 3(b). The proposed antenna is designed and fabricated on a low-cost single-layer FR-4 substrate with a relative permittivity of 4.4 and a thickness of 1.6 mm. The overall size of the proposed antenna occupies only 22 × 20 mm2 which is much smaller than the antennas exhibited in [9–15]. The width of the 50-Ω CPW-fed line is 3.0 mm and the gap distance between the 50-Ω CPW-fed line and the coplanar ground plane is 0.4 mm. The length of each resonant element (l) is close to a quarter of the guided wavelength (λ
g) calculated at the desired resonant frequencies and λ
g is obtain according to
(1)
λ
g
=
c
ε
eff
f
ε
eff
≈
(
ε
r
+
1
)
2
l
=
λ
g
4
,
where c (m/s) is the speed of light in free space, f (Hz) is the required resonant frequency, l is the total length of each resonant element, and ε
eff is the effective relative permittivity. By regulating the geometry parameters of these three resonant elements based on (1), the design can be obtained by numerical simulations. The measurement works are implemented by an Agilent N5244A network analyzer. Good agreement between the simulated results and measured ones can be observed as shown in Figure 4.(a) Layout of the proposed triband antenna. (b) Photograph of the fabricated prototype antenna.
(a)
(b)Figure 4
Simulated and measured return loss of the proposed antenna.


## 3. Results and Discussion

In order to further discuss the performance of the presented antenna, the simulated surface current distributions of the antenna at frequencies of 2.4, 3.5, and 5.5 GHz are shown in Figure5. From this plot, one can clearly observe that most of the surface current is distributed on the inverted L-strip and left side of the asymmetric ring resonator at 2.4 GHz, whereas the surface current distributions become more concentrated on the right side of the asymmetric ring resonator and the straight strip at 3.5 and 5.5 GHz, respectively.Surface current distributions of proposed antenna at (a) 2.4, (b) 3.5, and (c) 5.5 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)The triband antenna is influenced by different parameters as shown in Figure6. Figure 6(a) depicts the simulated reflection coefficients of the antenna when the size of l
1 (shown in Figure 3(a)) changes. From Figure 6(a), it is clear that the resonant frequency at about 2.4 GHz decreases gradually with the increase of l
1. As shown in Figures 6(b) and 6(c), the resonant frequencies at about 3.5 and 5.5 GHz are affected by l
2 and l
3, respectively. The simulated reflection coefficients of the antenna with varied l
4 are plotted in Figure 6(d). It can be seen that center frequencies of the three bands are almost unchanged, and the first band of the proposed triband antenna is unaffected by l
4. In addition, bandwidth of the second band increases with the increase of l
4, and bandwidth of the third band decreases when l
4 increases. So, the desired resonant frequencies of the triband antenna can be achieved by changing the values of l
1, l
2, and l
3.Simulated reflection coefficients of the triband antenna with varied(a)l
1, (b) l
2, (c) l
3, and (d) l
4.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The simulated and measured far field radiation patterns of co- and cross-polarizations for E- and H-cuts of the proposed antenna at 2.4/3.5/5.5 GHz are illustrated in Figures7(a), 7(b), and 7(c), respectively. The peak gains in all the operating bands are plotted in Figure 8 which reveals that the average peak gains of the three bands are 1.78, 2.35, and 3.82 dBi, respectively.Measured and simulated co- and cross-polarizations for E- and H-cuts of the proposed antenna at frequencies of (a) 2.4, (b) 3.5, and (c) 5.5 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 8
Measured peak gains of the proposed triband antenna.Table1 gives a comparison between the proposed triband antenna and some previous works. It can be observed that the proposed work realizes triband performance capable of WLAN and WiMAX applications on a low-cost substrate with a compact circuit size as well as wide impedance bandwidths.Table 1
Comparison of the proposed triband antenna with some reported works.
References
Size (mm2)
Applications
Bandwidths (GHz)
[5]
27
×
39.5
WiMAX
2.42–2.7/3.46–4.46/5.72–5.85
[9]
34.5
×
18
WLAN/WiMAX
2.35–2.49/3.27–3.8/4.65–5.89
[10]
30
×
20
WLAN/WiMAX
2.4–2.74/3.41–3.75/5.24–5.88
[11]
30
×
18
WLAN/WiMAX
2.39–2.69/3.38–3.73/5–5.99
[12]
40
×
40
WLAN/WiMAX
2.28–2.58/3.38–3.66/5.07–5.86
[13]
30
×
40
WLAN/WiMAX
2–2.89/3.18–3.95/4.7–5.95
[14]
40
×
40
WLAN/WiMAX
2.28–3.23/3.28–3.94/5.05–6.17
[15]
42
×
25
WLAN/WiMAX
2.37–2.72/3.39–4.07/4.92–6
This work
22
×
20
WLAN/WiMAX
2.39–2.49/3.36–3.72/5.13–5.89


## 4. Conclusion

In this paper, a CPW-fed triband antenna for WLAN/WiMAX communication systems is proposed. The proposed triband antenna consists of an asymmetric ring, an inverted L-strip, and a straight strip. According to the sizes of these three elements, three distinct bands can be obtained, respectively. Compared to antennas proposed in [1–15], the presented antenna has a simple structure with a compact size of only 22 × 20 × 1.6 mm3. Measured results demonstrate that the proposed antenna covers the WLAN (2.4/5.2/5.8 GHz) and WiMAX (3.5/5.5 GHz) bands and the antenna has reasonable gains. All these merits indicate that the triband antenna is quite suitable for WLAN and WiMAX applications.



---

*Source: 419642-2014-10-16.xml*