# Characterization of Nanosilica/Low-Density Polyethylene Nanocomposite Materials

Authors: Malek Alghdeir; Khaled Mayya; Mohamed Dib
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Six ratios of nanosilica particles were employed to fabricate low-density polyethylene (LDPE) composites using melt mixing and hot molding methods. Several composite films with different ratios (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 wt%) of SiO2 were prepared. The obtained composite films were identified and characterized by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-VIS). At a specific mixing ratio, far infrared radiation transmittance was prohibited while the ultraviolet-visible transmittance is allowed; this will be explained in detail. Optical measurements show that the composite films prevent the transmission of IR radiation near 9 μm and allow UV-VIS transmission during sun-shining time. The mechanical behaviour of a nanosilica-reinforced LDPE composite was studied using tensile tests. The addition of 1 wt% nanosilica has successfully enhanced the mechanical properties of the LDPE material.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Polymeric materials are widely used in food packaging and in greenhouses. Typical examples of such materials are polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [1, 2].During the past years, much effort has been devoted to polymer nanocomposites [3]. Polymer nanocomposites often show excellent mechanical properties compared to the traditional composites at a lower loading of the nanoparticles [4]. So far, a few researches have studied the effects of different nanoparticles on the performances of composite materials such as nanosilica [3]. The excellent performance of silica film has attracted attention in academia and industry due to its antiresistance, hardness, corrosion resistance [5], dielectric properties [6], optical transparency, etc. [7]. Silica as a thin film is widely used to improve the surface properties of materials. This is why silica thin films are used in many fields as in antireflection coating film field [8]. In the packaging industry, silica films are used as barrier layers in polymer packaging materials. Most of the modern packaging materials do not provide an efficient barrier against the permeation of gases. This leads to food and drinks getting rotten quickly. Because of this, a silica film deposited on the surface of the polymer packaging becomes popular and indispensable. Besides, silica films can be also used as corrosion protective layers of metals. Because of the universal application of silicon dioxide films in various fields, the preparation of silica with high quality is always an important aim of scientific research [9].Lately, a number of different barrier technologies were being developed. Theoretically, a barrier function can be inserted into a plastic-based material via two different means: either by mixing a barrier material into the base polymer or by coating a layer of the barrier material on the polymer surface [10, 11].The traditional method of preparing polymer/silica composites was direct mixing of the silica into the polymer. The mixing could be done by melt blending and solution blending. The main difficulty in the mixing process is the effective dispersion of the silica nanoparticles in the polymer matrix, because they usually tend to agglomerate [12].This work represents the results of optical and thermal experiments on LDPE mixed with nanosilica particles at different ratios (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 wt%). The aim is to achieve a nanocomposite that prevents the transmittance of IR radiation and allows the transmittance of UV-VIS, so that most of the thermal radiation of the ground and plants in the greenhouse is conserved. The mechanical properties of the nanocomposite, such as the tensile strength, the elongation at break, and Young’s modulus, were also evaluated and discussed.By studying the blackbody thermal radiation, all objects with a temperature above absolute zero were shown to emit energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation. A blackbody is a theoretical or model body which absorbs all radiation falling on it. It is a hypothetical object which is a “perfect” absorber and a “perfect” emitter of radiation. The electromagnetic radiation emitted by a blackbody has a specific spectrum and intensity that depends only on the body’s temperature; the thermal radiation spontaneously emitted by ordinary objects, land, and plants, for example, can be approximated as blackbody radiation. Figure1 shows the blackbody radiation spectrum at 273, 293, 313, 333, 373, 393, 413, 433, and 453 K. We are interested in the vicinity of 10 μm (9 to 11), because at the temperatures near 0°C, (273 K) the thermal radiation from the ground is the maximum at 10 μm, while at the temperature of 30°C (303 K), the thermal radiation from the ground is the maximum at 9.5 μm [9].Figure 1
Blackbody radiation spectra at 273, 293, 313, 333, 373, 393, 413, 433, and 453 K. This figure was reproduced from Alghdeir et al. [9] (under the Creative Commons Attribution License/public domain).


## 2. Material and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Low-density polyethylene (LDPE), a thermoplastic made from an ethylene monomer with a density of 0.922 g/cm3, was purchased from Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC). High-purity fumed nanosilica (purity>99%) with an average particle size of ~12 nm and the trademark of A200 was obtained from Evonik Degussa AG (Germany). Table 1 shows the basic physical and chemical properties of the fumed nanosilica used in the present work.Table 1
Basic physical and chemical properties of fumed nanosilica.
Properties
Value
Physical state
Solid
Color
White
Form
Powder
pH
3.7-4.5
Surface area
200±25 (m2/g)
Melting point/range
Approx. 1700°C
Density
Approx. 2.2 g/cm3
Water solubility
>1 mg/l
Thermal decomposition
>2000°C
Loss on drying
≤1.5% (2 hours at 105°C)
SiO2 content based on ignited material
>99.8%


### 2.2. Sample Preparation

Samples were prepared by blending LDPE and silica with different ratios (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 wt%). The different nanosilica ratios were mechanically mixed with the LDPE granules at a processing temperature of 130°C and a speed of 50 rpm for 10 min using the internal mixer (Brabender Plasti-Corder PL-2200, W50, Germany). Films with dimensions of10cm×10cm×120μm of the neat LDPE and nanocomposites were obtained by a hot-press method at 140°C and under 50 bar. For the mechanical behaviour tests of the composite, other plates were prepared using the abovementioned procedure with a thickness of 1.8±0.1mm.


## 2.1. Materials

Low-density polyethylene (LDPE), a thermoplastic made from an ethylene monomer with a density of 0.922 g/cm3, was purchased from Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC). High-purity fumed nanosilica (purity>99%) with an average particle size of ~12 nm and the trademark of A200 was obtained from Evonik Degussa AG (Germany). Table 1 shows the basic physical and chemical properties of the fumed nanosilica used in the present work.Table 1
Basic physical and chemical properties of fumed nanosilica.
Properties
Value
Physical state
Solid
Color
White
Form
Powder
pH
3.7-4.5
Surface area
200±25 (m2/g)
Melting point/range
Approx. 1700°C
Density
Approx. 2.2 g/cm3
Water solubility
>1 mg/l
Thermal decomposition
>2000°C
Loss on drying
≤1.5% (2 hours at 105°C)
SiO2 content based on ignited material
>99.8%


## 2.2. Sample Preparation

Samples were prepared by blending LDPE and silica with different ratios (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 wt%). The different nanosilica ratios were mechanically mixed with the LDPE granules at a processing temperature of 130°C and a speed of 50 rpm for 10 min using the internal mixer (Brabender Plasti-Corder PL-2200, W50, Germany). Films with dimensions of10cm×10cm×120μm of the neat LDPE and nanocomposites were obtained by a hot-press method at 140°C and under 50 bar. For the mechanical behaviour tests of the composite, other plates were prepared using the abovementioned procedure with a thickness of 1.8±0.1mm.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Study of Mechanical Properties

For the studies of mechanical properties, the test specimens were molded and cut according to the dimensions specified in Table2.Table 2
Dimensions of samples for tensile test.
Specifications
Dimensions (mm)
Sample length
75
Display ends
12.5±1
Length of the active part
25±1
Display the effective part
4±0.1
External radius
8±0.5
Internal radius
12.5±1The tensile test was achieved using a traction-compression machine (Adamel Lhomargy DY34) under atmospheric conditions. For each ratio, including the neat LDPE (the control sample), five samples were tested and their values were averaged. The tensile tests were carried at a speed of 5 mm/min. Table3 shows a summary of the tensile data for the control sample and the samples of six composites.Table 3
Summary of tensile data for the control sample and six composites of LDPE.
Material
Property
Sample no. 1
Sample no. 2
Sample no. 3
Sample no. 4
Sample no. 5
Average
Std. Dev.
Neat LDPE (control sample)
Maximum load (N)
60
60
50
60
60
58
4.47
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.40
8.42
7.13
8.67
8.28
8.18
0.60
% elongation at break
190
230
323
258
248
250
48
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
66.64
56.73
67.53
69.45
62.01
64.47
5.1
LDPE 0.5 wt% SiO2
Maximum load (N)
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.13
8.39
8.24
8.28
8.35
8.27
0.1
% elongation at break
263
394
276
311
293
307
52
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
104
102
98
81
92
95.4
9.2
LDPE 1 wt% SiO2
Maximum load (N)
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.83
8.75
8.82
8.65
8.89
8.78
0.09
% elongation at break
410
355
377
410
318
374
40
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
95
90
93
96
68
88.4
12
LDPE 2.5 wt% SiO2
Maximum load (N)
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.46
8.67
8.82
8.48
8.80
8.64
0.17
% elongation at break
260
444
273
456
379
362
92
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
99
96
94
99
92
96
3.5
LDPE 5 wt% SiO2
Maximum load (N)
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.34
8.17
8.39
8.32
8.16
8.27
0.10
% elongation at break
142
201
229
338
247
231
71
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
105
118
135
124
128
122
11
LDPE 7.5 wt% SiO2
Maximum load (N)
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.37
8.43
8.36
8.24
8.38
8.35
0.07
% elongation at break
242
231
222
300
270
253
31
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
106
139
110
109
96
112
16
LDPE 10 wt% SiO2
Maximum load (N)
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.43
8.04
8.51
8.48
8.47
8.38
0.19
% elongation at break
139
126
95
116
114
118
16
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
104
129
95
141
141
122
21Stress-strain curves from tensile tests for LDPE/silica nanocomposites are shown in Figure2. It can be noticed that the stress at break gradually increases with the increase of up to 1 wt% of the silica ratio. This result suggests that the nanosilica particles would reinforce stress and cause the increase of the tensile strength of the nanocomposite.Figure 2
Typical stress-strain curves of neat LDPE and LDPE/silica nanocomposites.Figure2 also shows that the elongation at break values of the nanocomposite greatly increases with the nanosilica particle ratio that is also up to 1 wt%. This can be explained by the increase in the surface bonding between the molecules of the polymer, when the nanosilica particles are added to it. Similar results have been obtained with other oxides [13].Beyond 1 wt%, it can be noticed from Figure2 that the values of both the tensile strength and elongation at break of the nanocomposite decrease with the increase in the nanosilica particle ratio incorporated. This result can be explained by the agglomeration of the nanosilica particles within the polymer matrix. This agglomeration can even be seen with the naked eye in the form of white spots within the samples (see Figure 3).Figure 3
Images of the surface of the LDPE/silica composites containing (a) 0 wt%, (b) 1 wt%, (c) 5 wt%, and 10 wt% of nanosilica particles.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure4 shows the variations in Young’s modulus of the nanocomposite with the nanosilica particle ratios. The elongation at break was also added to the figure. It can be noticed that Young’s modulus increases with the nanosilica particle ratios of up to 5 wt%. Beyond this value, we notice that the values of Young’s modulus remain practically constant (up to the uncertainties). The already mentioned decrease in the elongation at break is explained by the agglomeration of the nanosilica particles within the polymer matrix, as already mentioned.Figure 4
Elongation at break and modulus of elasticity (averaged values) as a function of different ratios of SiO2.


### 3.2. Optical Study

#### 3.2.1. Infrared Spectroscopic Study

The transmittance of samples was examined by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) (VERTEX 70/70v FT-IR spectrometer from Bruker™ Optics) in the wavelength range of 1-25μm. Figure 5 shows the transmittance spectra of the SiO2/LDPE films with different ratios. Different absorption peaks could be identified in the MIR range. The first one at ~3 μm is caused by the OH group; other peaks at ~9 μm, ~12 μm, and ~21 μm are due to the Si-O-Si resonance mode of vibrations [14]. Some of these peaks also involve the LDPE substrate in the IR absorption spectra. The peak at 9 μm gives SiO2 its importance and allows it to be used in this application. We observe a decrease in the transmittance when the mixing ratio of SiO2 increases. The changes in the average transmittance for wavelengths ranging from 7 to 10.5 μm are shown in Figure 6. We notice a sharp decline in transmittance when the ratio of SiO2 is increased.Figure 5
FTIR spectra for different ratios of LDPE/silica nanocomposite films.Figure 6
FTIR spectra in the range 7-10.5μm.


#### 3.2.2. Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy Study

The optical transmittance measurements of LDPE/silica nanocomposite substrate films were carried out with a UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (A560 UV Spectrophotometer, AOE Instruments) at the normal incident of light in the wavelength range of 200-1100 nm. Figure7 shows the transmittance spectra of the samples. The UV spectra show that the composite substrates (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 wt% SiO2) have no significant effect on the transmittance. On the other hand, a significant decrease in the transmittance is observed with a mixture ratio of 10 wt% SiO2 compared to the LDPE without mixing. This decrease is addressed in Results and Discussion.Figure 7
UV-visible spectra of LDPE/silica nanocomposite films.


### 3.3. Thermal Study

We built a minigreenhouse using LDPE without mixing and another one using LDPE mixed with 2.5 wt% SiO2. We also built a third minigreenhouse using window silka glass (the glass thickness is 6 mm, and the transmittance from 350 to 1100 nm is approximately 88%) (see Figure 8). All the three greenhouses have a cube shape with sides measuring 20 cm. Inside each greenhouse, we put a small plant. These plants were previously grown under similar conditions.Figure 8
Three greenhouses: (a) LDPE without mixing, (b) LDPE mixed with 2.5 wt% SiO2, and (c) silica glass. This figure was reproduced from Alghdeir et al. [9] (under the Creative Commons Attribution License/public domain).
(a)
(b)
(c)The temperature inside each greenhouse was measured using identical temperature sensors (Tecnologic UK with 0.1°C resolution). The external temperature was also measured using an identical sensor. All the measurements were made at the same moment every thirty minutes starting from 1 p.m. until 6 a.m. the next day. Figure9 shows the temperature variations inside the three greenhouses along with the external air temperature. An increase in the temperature inside the greenhouse mixed with 2.5 wt% SiO2 is noticed. This increase is estimated to be more than 2°C compared with the LDPE greenhouse without mixing (2°C overall and 2.2°C between 11 PM and 5 AM). We also notice that the transmittance of the greenhouse mixed with 2.5 wt% SiO2 closely approaches that of the glass house (see the green and blue triangles in Figure 9). In fact, the average temperature difference is about 0.14°C overall and the two temperatures between 11 PM and 5 AM match each other very well.Figure 9
The variations of the difference of temperature (ΔT) between the temperature inside the greenhouse and the temperature in the external air during the time.By studying the IR transmission in Figures5, 6, and 10, a decrease in the transmittance near 9 μm with increasing mixture ratios is noticed. This result explains the rise in temperature inside the minigreenhouses (shown in Figure 10). The LDPE/silica nanocomposite barrier films preserve the thermal radiation of the ground. Thus, the internal temperature inside the greenhouse is maintained.Figure 10
Transmittance at 9μm as a function of different ratios of SiO2.One can also notice that in the vicinity of 9μm, the transmittance of the sample with a ratio of 5 wt% SiO2 is very close to that of the sample with a ratio of 2.5 wt% SiO2. We deduce that it may not be very beneficial to go beyond a ratio of 2.5 wt% SiO2.By studying the UV-VIS transmission in Figure7, a significant decrease is noticed in the transmittance of the film with a ratio of 10 wt% SiO2, compared with the other films with a lesser ratio (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 wt% SiO2). These five composite barrier films do not have any significant effect on the transmittance compared with that of the LDPE without mixing. Thus, the film with a ratio of 2.5 wt% SiO2 composite was adopted to build the minigreenhouse. It has no effect on the UV-VIS transmission but it reduces the maximum transmission of the IR radiation to around 9 μm.The refractive index of LDPE in the visible domain is 1.51, while the imaginary part isk=0 [15]. It is very close to the value of the real part of the refractive index of SiO2 which is equal to 1.43 [16]. Therefore, there should not be any significant change in the transmittance of the LDPE in the visible range when mixed with SiO2. This is clearly seen in Figure 7) except for the last case where the ratio of SiO2 is 10 wt%. Consequently, there should not be any significant change in the greenhouse temperature during sun-shining time. The significant reduction in the transmittance in the case where the ratio of 10 wt% SiO2 is probably due to Mie scattering [17].


## 3.1. Study of Mechanical Properties

For the studies of mechanical properties, the test specimens were molded and cut according to the dimensions specified in Table2.Table 2
Dimensions of samples for tensile test.
Specifications
Dimensions (mm)
Sample length
75
Display ends
12.5±1
Length of the active part
25±1
Display the effective part
4±0.1
External radius
8±0.5
Internal radius
12.5±1The tensile test was achieved using a traction-compression machine (Adamel Lhomargy DY34) under atmospheric conditions. For each ratio, including the neat LDPE (the control sample), five samples were tested and their values were averaged. The tensile tests were carried at a speed of 5 mm/min. Table3 shows a summary of the tensile data for the control sample and the samples of six composites.Table 3
Summary of tensile data for the control sample and six composites of LDPE.
Material
Property
Sample no. 1
Sample no. 2
Sample no. 3
Sample no. 4
Sample no. 5
Average
Std. Dev.
Neat LDPE (control sample)
Maximum load (N)
60
60
50
60
60
58
4.47
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.40
8.42
7.13
8.67
8.28
8.18
0.60
% elongation at break
190
230
323
258
248
250
48
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
66.64
56.73
67.53
69.45
62.01
64.47
5.1
LDPE 0.5 wt% SiO2
Maximum load (N)
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.13
8.39
8.24
8.28
8.35
8.27
0.1
% elongation at break
263
394
276
311
293
307
52
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
104
102
98
81
92
95.4
9.2
LDPE 1 wt% SiO2
Maximum load (N)
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.83
8.75
8.82
8.65
8.89
8.78
0.09
% elongation at break
410
355
377
410
318
374
40
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
95
90
93
96
68
88.4
12
LDPE 2.5 wt% SiO2
Maximum load (N)
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.46
8.67
8.82
8.48
8.80
8.64
0.17
% elongation at break
260
444
273
456
379
362
92
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
99
96
94
99
92
96
3.5
LDPE 5 wt% SiO2
Maximum load (N)
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.34
8.17
8.39
8.32
8.16
8.27
0.10
% elongation at break
142
201
229
338
247
231
71
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
105
118
135
124
128
122
11
LDPE 7.5 wt% SiO2
Maximum load (N)
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.37
8.43
8.36
8.24
8.38
8.35
0.07
% elongation at break
242
231
222
300
270
253
31
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
106
139
110
109
96
112
16
LDPE 10 wt% SiO2
Maximum load (N)
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
Tensile strength (MPa)
8.43
8.04
8.51
8.48
8.47
8.38
0.19
% elongation at break
139
126
95
116
114
118
16
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
104
129
95
141
141
122
21Stress-strain curves from tensile tests for LDPE/silica nanocomposites are shown in Figure2. It can be noticed that the stress at break gradually increases with the increase of up to 1 wt% of the silica ratio. This result suggests that the nanosilica particles would reinforce stress and cause the increase of the tensile strength of the nanocomposite.Figure 2
Typical stress-strain curves of neat LDPE and LDPE/silica nanocomposites.Figure2 also shows that the elongation at break values of the nanocomposite greatly increases with the nanosilica particle ratio that is also up to 1 wt%. This can be explained by the increase in the surface bonding between the molecules of the polymer, when the nanosilica particles are added to it. Similar results have been obtained with other oxides [13].Beyond 1 wt%, it can be noticed from Figure2 that the values of both the tensile strength and elongation at break of the nanocomposite decrease with the increase in the nanosilica particle ratio incorporated. This result can be explained by the agglomeration of the nanosilica particles within the polymer matrix. This agglomeration can even be seen with the naked eye in the form of white spots within the samples (see Figure 3).Figure 3
Images of the surface of the LDPE/silica composites containing (a) 0 wt%, (b) 1 wt%, (c) 5 wt%, and 10 wt% of nanosilica particles.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure4 shows the variations in Young’s modulus of the nanocomposite with the nanosilica particle ratios. The elongation at break was also added to the figure. It can be noticed that Young’s modulus increases with the nanosilica particle ratios of up to 5 wt%. Beyond this value, we notice that the values of Young’s modulus remain practically constant (up to the uncertainties). The already mentioned decrease in the elongation at break is explained by the agglomeration of the nanosilica particles within the polymer matrix, as already mentioned.Figure 4
Elongation at break and modulus of elasticity (averaged values) as a function of different ratios of SiO2.


## 3.2. Optical Study

### 3.2.1. Infrared Spectroscopic Study

The transmittance of samples was examined by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) (VERTEX 70/70v FT-IR spectrometer from Bruker™ Optics) in the wavelength range of 1-25μm. Figure 5 shows the transmittance spectra of the SiO2/LDPE films with different ratios. Different absorption peaks could be identified in the MIR range. The first one at ~3 μm is caused by the OH group; other peaks at ~9 μm, ~12 μm, and ~21 μm are due to the Si-O-Si resonance mode of vibrations [14]. Some of these peaks also involve the LDPE substrate in the IR absorption spectra. The peak at 9 μm gives SiO2 its importance and allows it to be used in this application. We observe a decrease in the transmittance when the mixing ratio of SiO2 increases. The changes in the average transmittance for wavelengths ranging from 7 to 10.5 μm are shown in Figure 6. We notice a sharp decline in transmittance when the ratio of SiO2 is increased.Figure 5
FTIR spectra for different ratios of LDPE/silica nanocomposite films.Figure 6
FTIR spectra in the range 7-10.5μm.


### 3.2.2. Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy Study

The optical transmittance measurements of LDPE/silica nanocomposite substrate films were carried out with a UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (A560 UV Spectrophotometer, AOE Instruments) at the normal incident of light in the wavelength range of 200-1100 nm. Figure7 shows the transmittance spectra of the samples. The UV spectra show that the composite substrates (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 wt% SiO2) have no significant effect on the transmittance. On the other hand, a significant decrease in the transmittance is observed with a mixture ratio of 10 wt% SiO2 compared to the LDPE without mixing. This decrease is addressed in Results and Discussion.Figure 7
UV-visible spectra of LDPE/silica nanocomposite films.


## 3.2.1. Infrared Spectroscopic Study

The transmittance of samples was examined by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) (VERTEX 70/70v FT-IR spectrometer from Bruker™ Optics) in the wavelength range of 1-25μm. Figure 5 shows the transmittance spectra of the SiO2/LDPE films with different ratios. Different absorption peaks could be identified in the MIR range. The first one at ~3 μm is caused by the OH group; other peaks at ~9 μm, ~12 μm, and ~21 μm are due to the Si-O-Si resonance mode of vibrations [14]. Some of these peaks also involve the LDPE substrate in the IR absorption spectra. The peak at 9 μm gives SiO2 its importance and allows it to be used in this application. We observe a decrease in the transmittance when the mixing ratio of SiO2 increases. The changes in the average transmittance for wavelengths ranging from 7 to 10.5 μm are shown in Figure 6. We notice a sharp decline in transmittance when the ratio of SiO2 is increased.Figure 5
FTIR spectra for different ratios of LDPE/silica nanocomposite films.Figure 6
FTIR spectra in the range 7-10.5μm.


## 3.2.2. Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy Study

The optical transmittance measurements of LDPE/silica nanocomposite substrate films were carried out with a UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (A560 UV Spectrophotometer, AOE Instruments) at the normal incident of light in the wavelength range of 200-1100 nm. Figure7 shows the transmittance spectra of the samples. The UV spectra show that the composite substrates (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 wt% SiO2) have no significant effect on the transmittance. On the other hand, a significant decrease in the transmittance is observed with a mixture ratio of 10 wt% SiO2 compared to the LDPE without mixing. This decrease is addressed in Results and Discussion.Figure 7
UV-visible spectra of LDPE/silica nanocomposite films.


## 3.3. Thermal Study

We built a minigreenhouse using LDPE without mixing and another one using LDPE mixed with 2.5 wt% SiO2. We also built a third minigreenhouse using window silka glass (the glass thickness is 6 mm, and the transmittance from 350 to 1100 nm is approximately 88%) (see Figure 8). All the three greenhouses have a cube shape with sides measuring 20 cm. Inside each greenhouse, we put a small plant. These plants were previously grown under similar conditions.Figure 8
Three greenhouses: (a) LDPE without mixing, (b) LDPE mixed with 2.5 wt% SiO2, and (c) silica glass. This figure was reproduced from Alghdeir et al. [9] (under the Creative Commons Attribution License/public domain).
(a)
(b)
(c)The temperature inside each greenhouse was measured using identical temperature sensors (Tecnologic UK with 0.1°C resolution). The external temperature was also measured using an identical sensor. All the measurements were made at the same moment every thirty minutes starting from 1 p.m. until 6 a.m. the next day. Figure9 shows the temperature variations inside the three greenhouses along with the external air temperature. An increase in the temperature inside the greenhouse mixed with 2.5 wt% SiO2 is noticed. This increase is estimated to be more than 2°C compared with the LDPE greenhouse without mixing (2°C overall and 2.2°C between 11 PM and 5 AM). We also notice that the transmittance of the greenhouse mixed with 2.5 wt% SiO2 closely approaches that of the glass house (see the green and blue triangles in Figure 9). In fact, the average temperature difference is about 0.14°C overall and the two temperatures between 11 PM and 5 AM match each other very well.Figure 9
The variations of the difference of temperature (ΔT) between the temperature inside the greenhouse and the temperature in the external air during the time.By studying the IR transmission in Figures5, 6, and 10, a decrease in the transmittance near 9 μm with increasing mixture ratios is noticed. This result explains the rise in temperature inside the minigreenhouses (shown in Figure 10). The LDPE/silica nanocomposite barrier films preserve the thermal radiation of the ground. Thus, the internal temperature inside the greenhouse is maintained.Figure 10
Transmittance at 9μm as a function of different ratios of SiO2.One can also notice that in the vicinity of 9μm, the transmittance of the sample with a ratio of 5 wt% SiO2 is very close to that of the sample with a ratio of 2.5 wt% SiO2. We deduce that it may not be very beneficial to go beyond a ratio of 2.5 wt% SiO2.By studying the UV-VIS transmission in Figure7, a significant decrease is noticed in the transmittance of the film with a ratio of 10 wt% SiO2, compared with the other films with a lesser ratio (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 wt% SiO2). These five composite barrier films do not have any significant effect on the transmittance compared with that of the LDPE without mixing. Thus, the film with a ratio of 2.5 wt% SiO2 composite was adopted to build the minigreenhouse. It has no effect on the UV-VIS transmission but it reduces the maximum transmission of the IR radiation to around 9 μm.The refractive index of LDPE in the visible domain is 1.51, while the imaginary part isk=0 [15]. It is very close to the value of the real part of the refractive index of SiO2 which is equal to 1.43 [16]. Therefore, there should not be any significant change in the transmittance of the LDPE in the visible range when mixed with SiO2. This is clearly seen in Figure 7) except for the last case where the ratio of SiO2 is 10 wt%. Consequently, there should not be any significant change in the greenhouse temperature during sun-shining time. The significant reduction in the transmittance in the case where the ratio of 10 wt% SiO2 is probably due to Mie scattering [17].


## 4. Conclusion

Throughout this study, silicon dioxide films with different ratios (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 wt% SiO2) were mixed with a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) polymer using the melt mixing technique.The effect of the incorporation of 0.5–10 wt% of silica particles to a tensile property of LDPE was investigated. The results showed that the addition of 1 wt% of nanosilica has successfully enhanced the tensile strength and elongation at break of the nanosilica-filled LDPE material. The incorporation of >1 wt% of nanosilica particles had caused agglomeration and uneven distribution of the particles in LDPE.By using these LDPE/silica nanocomposites to build a minigreenhouse, SiO2 reduces the transmission of radiation near 9 μm and allows the transmission of ultraviolet and visible radiation to pass through them during daytime (period of sunshine, without being exposed to direct sunshine). Thus, we were able to preserve the thermal radiation of the ground by raising the internal temperature of the greenhouse up to more than 2°C, compared with the same greenhouse without mixing. The temperature inside the LDPE/silica greenhouse was found to be almost identical to that inside the glass greenhouse.Statistically speaking, the conclusions are acceptable because the experiment was replicated many times. The main gain is the fact that the LDPE/silica greenhouse has the same temperature as the glass-made greenhouse.



---

*Source: 4184351-2019-03-20.xml*