# Development of Bioadhesive Microspheres for Oral Bioavailability Enhancement of Berberine Hydrochloride

Authors: Ye Zhang; Hongming Liu
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The objective of this study was to innovatively prepare chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin BBH loaded microspheres and evaluate their pharmaceutical characteristics and pharmacokinetics. The bioadhesive microspheres were prepared using an emulsification technique. Three batches of microspheres were formed and their stability was evaluated. BBH loaded microspheres were almost spherical with shallow elevation on surfaces. The mean particle size of microspheres was 368.2μm, drug loading was 3.59±0.01%, andin situ bioadhesion percentage was 91.23%±8.2% and they achieved a sustained release with 71.29% for 8 hoursin vitro. Pharmacokinetic studies in rats indicated that the bioavailability of BBH microspheres was enhanced about 1.5-fold as compared with commercial tablets. BBH microspheres exhibited a sustained-release profile over 48 h. Thus, chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin BBH loaded microspheres which combined the advantages of alginate/gelatin microspheres and chitosan may be used as a sustained delivery system for BBH to treat duodenal and benign gastric ulcers.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Berberine hydrochloride (BBH), an active isoquinoline alkaloid, is widely present in various traditional Chinese medicines such asHydrastis canadensis (goldenseal),Coptis chinensis (Coptis or golden thread),Berberis aquifolium (Oregon grape),Berberis vulgaris (barberry), andBerberis aristata (tree turmeric). BBH is commercially used to treat duodenal and benign gastric ulcers caused by bacteria. BBH has been found to be effective for diabetes and obesity, partly via stimulating AMP-activated protein kinase activity [1, 2]. BBH has also shown antidepressant activity by modulating brain biogenic amines (norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine), oxide pathway, and/or sigma receptors [3–5]. Recently, BBH has been reported as a novel cholesterol-lowering agent, and it functions through a unique mechanism distinct from statins [6]. However, BBH, one of the poorly water-soluble drugs and substrate of P-glycoprotein [7, 8], has low mucosal permeability [9], resulting in limited absorption in the gastrointestinal tract, which seriously limits its application and development as a pharmaceutical preparation. Furthermore, intramuscular and intravenous administration of BBH could result in adverse reactions such as anaphylactic shock and drug eruption [10]. Hence, a novel drug delivery system to improve the solubility and bioavailability of BBH has drawn great attention of researchers in pharmaceutical industry.In the last decade, microspheres have prospered enormously because of a variety of applications such as delivery vesicles for drugs, deoxyribonucleic acids, antigens, proteins, and enzymes, especially for controlled or sustained drug-delivering systems employing biopolymers as raw material [11–13]. Recently, in pharmaceutical industry, microspheres have drawn great attention due to their excellent efficiency in prolonging the half-life time of drug and improving bioavailability of drugin vivo by controlling release rate of drug from the microspheres [14–17]. In addition, simple techniques are involved in the preparation of microspheres [18–21]. At present, a couple of biodegradable polymers such as chitosan, alginate, and gelatin have been used to prepare microspheres [22–24]. Chitosan is a type of excellent natural hydrophilic polysaccharide among many biodegradable polymers, and it is nontoxic and shows excellent mucoadhesive and permeation-enhancing effects across biological surfaces [25]. Chitosan exhibits antacid and antiulcer effects, which may prevent or weaken drug irritation in the stomach [26]. Additionally, chitosan is a pH-sensitive hydrogel and, at low pH value, protonated amino group (-NH3+) can make chitosan molecules adhere to mucosal surfaces easily. Hence, chitosan has great potential in oral drug delivery system to treat gastric ulceration. Alginate has bioadhesive properties and can also be effective in protecting mucous membranes of the gastrointestinal tract. In the present study, a sustained drug delivery system of chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin gastric mucoadhesive BBH loaded microspheres was designed to treat duodenal and benign gastric ulcers. The microspheres were cross-linked with 1-ethyl-3- (3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS). EDC is a condensation agent between carboxyl and amino groups to form amide bonds to immobilize the microspheres and it has lower cytotoxicity compared with other chemical cross-linking agents such as glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde [27]. The microspheres were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), particle size and distribution analysis, andin situ bioadhesion test. Thein vitro dissolution rate of microspheres was measured in simulated gastric fluid by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and thein vivo bioavailability in rats was assayed using tandem mass spectroscopy coupled to ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC-MS/MS).


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

BBH, chitosan, gelatin, EDC, and NHS were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). BBH commercial tablets were bought from First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of TCM. Span 80 was purchased from Croda International Plc (Yorkshire, UK). Sodium alginate was obtained from Bio Basic Inc. (Toronto, Canada). Liquid paraffin was purchased from Tianjin No. 1 Chemical Reagent Factory (Tianjin, China). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.


### 2.2. Preparation of Chitosan-Coated Alginate/Gelatin BBH Loaded Microspheres

BBH loaded microspheres were prepared by water-in-oil emulsion technique as previously reported [28]. Briefly, water phase containing sodium alginate/gelatin (2 : 3) (5.0% w : v) and BBH (0.5 g) was dissolved in 2% (v/v) acetic acid aqueous solution. Oil phase containing liquid paraffin and emulsifiers (Span 80 and Tween 80, 4 : 1 ratio, v/v) was homogenized under stirred conditions at 40°C. Later, water phase was added to oil phase (1 : 5, v : v) under stirred conditions of 450 rpm at 40°C. The prepared mixture was kept over an ice-water bath for approximately 15 min and then 20 mL of isopropanol was added to the mixture with continuous stirring for 10 min to obtain a stable emulsion system. 4 mL of cross-linking agents (EDC/NHS, 4 : 1, w/w) was dissolved in 50 mM of MES buffer and they were then added to the inverse emulsion with continuous stirring for 1 h in ice-water bath, followed by stirring for 4 h in room temperature. Then, 120 mL of acetone was added to end the cross-linking reaction. The microspheres were collected by filtration. Washing cycles were performed with acetone and isopropanol before redispersion in distilled water and subsequent lyophilization. The prepared microspheres were immersed into the 0.5% chitosan acetate aqueous solution at 30°C for 30 min. Finally, chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin BBH loaded microspheres were collected and washed three times with deionized water. The microspheres were immersed in carbodiimide solution for 12 h and they were then dried at 40°C. Three batches of microspheres were formed.


### 2.3. Characterization of Chitosan-Coated Microspheres

#### 2.3.1. SEM Observation of Microspheres

The shape and surface features of microspheres were observed using SEM (Philips XL30, Netherlands). The microspheres were suspended in distilled water and the dispersion was dropped on glass slide and dried at ambient atmosphere. The samples were coated with gold for SEM observation.


#### 2.3.2. Particle Size and Distribution Analysis

The microspheres were dispersed in distilled water and the particle size and distribution of microspheres were measured by laser diffractometry using LS230 Coulter (Coulter Co., USA).


#### 2.3.3. Drug Entrapment Efficiency and Loading

Drug entrapment efficiency, and loading were determined by dissolving known amount of microspheres in 50 mL of simulated gastric fluid under stirring for 48 h at 37°C. Then, the supernatant was filtered and analyzed using HPLC (Waters 2695 System, Milford, USA). Drug entrapment efficiency and loading were calculated using the following equations:(1)Drug  entrapment  efficiency=actual  BBH  contenttheoreticalBBH  content×100%,Drug  loading=BBH  contentmicrocapsules  weight×100%.


#### 2.3.4. Stability Study

The microspheres were stored at60±2°C, 92.5±5% RH, and 4500±500 lx for 10 days without package. Samples were withdrawn at different time and evaluated for appearance and BBH content.


#### 2.3.5. Bioadhesion of Chitosan-Coated BBH Loaded Microspheres

The bioadhesion of chitosan-coated BBH loaded microspheres was investigated according to the method previously reported by Rao and Buri [29]. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (weighing 450–500 g) were maintained at standard conditions and fasted overnight with free access to water until experiment. All procedures were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The experimental protocol was approved by the Committee on Animal Research of Zibo Institute for Food and Drug Control.The rats were anaesthetised with 5% chloral hydrate (250 mg/kg, i.p.). Stomach was dissected and rinsed with physiological saline till the mucosa was clean. The tissue was used within 2 h after dissection. Then, the stomach was cut longitudinally, spread, and placed on a microscope slid. 50 mg of uncoated or coated microspheres was placed uniformly on the mucosa of the stomach. The microscope slid was then placed in a desiccator maintained at >80% relative humidity and room temperature. After 20 min, the microscope slid was fixed in a washing jar at an angle of 45°. The stomach mucosa was washed for 5 min with 30 mL of flushing liquid (0.9% NaCl, 0.1 mol/L HCl, pH1.2±0.1) at the rate of 0.1 mL/s using a peristaltic pump. The washings were collected, dried, and weighed. The bioadhesion of stomach was calculated according to the following equation:(2)Bioadhesion%=M-G-mM×100%,where M is the quality of microspheres (50 mg), G is the quality of the dried residue, and m is the quality of the solid in the 30 mL of flushing liquid.


### 2.4.In Vitro Release Studies

The dissolution study was performed using rotating basket method (Sotax AT7, Basel, Switzerland). The microspheres and tablets equivalent to 10 mg BBH were dispersed in 200 mL of simulated gastric fluid and stirred at 50 rpm at37±0.5°C. A 0.5 mL of the suspension was withdrawn at specified time intervals, filtered, and the concentration of the supernatant was analyzed using HPLC. 5 μL of the collected supernatant was injected into a chromatograph (Waters 2695, USA) equipped with a UV detector (Waters 2487) and a reversed phase ProntoSIL 120-5-C18-ace-APS column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, Bischoff Chromatography, Germany). The mobile phase was acetonitrile-water (30 : 70) containing 0.1% of phosphoric acid and 0.05% of triethylamine. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the UV detector was set at a wavelength of 263 nm.


### 2.5.In Vivo Availability Studies

The bioavailability of microspheres was compared with BBH commercial tablets. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (weighing 200–250 g) were randomly divided into two groups of twelve rats each. The rats were fasted overnight with free access to water until administered with microspheres (prepared by dispersing the microspheres in distilled water) or BBH commercial tablets (24 mg BBH/kg).0.5 mL of blood samples was collected from the retinal venous plexus into heparinized Eppendorf tubes at 0.083, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h. Blood samples were immediately centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min and stored at −20°C until UPLC-MS/MS analysis.Tetrahydropalmatine was used as an internal standard at a final concentration of 2 ng/mL. 200μL of acetonitrile-methanol (50 : 50, v/v) solution was added to 50 μL of rat plasma. After vortex mixing for 1 min, the resultant mixture was centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred to a clean tube and 10 μL of supernatant was injected into a Shimadzu LC-20AD system equipped with a binary pump, a micro vacuum degasser, and an autoinjector. The separation was performed on an Agilent ZORBAX XDB-C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 3.5 μm). The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water (A) and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in methanol. The flow gradient was as follows: 0–0.6 min, 90% A; 0.6–1.2 min, 90–2% A; 1.2–3.0 min, 2% A; 3.0–3.1 min, 2–90% A; and 3.1–4.5 min, 90% A, at a flow rate of 0.45 mL/min.The abovementioned UPLC system was connected with an API 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometry system via an ESI interface. The ESI-MS spectra of samples and reference compounds were acquired in positive ionization modes. The set parameters were as follows: the multiple reaction monitoring mode atm/z 336.10 → 292.10 (BBH) andm/z 356.3 → 192.10 (tetrahydropalmatine), curtain gas at 20 psi, ion spray voltage at 5.0 kV, temperature at 500°C, ion source gas1 at 55 psi, and ion source gas 2 at 55 psi.The pharmacokinetic parameters, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach Cmax (Tmax) were obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time data. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. The values of Cmax and AUC were analyzed statistically using analysis of variance after logarithmic transformation. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The relative bioavailability of microspheres was calculated using the following equation: Fr=AUCmicrophere/AUCreference(commercial  tablets).


## 2.1. Materials

BBH, chitosan, gelatin, EDC, and NHS were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). BBH commercial tablets were bought from First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of TCM. Span 80 was purchased from Croda International Plc (Yorkshire, UK). Sodium alginate was obtained from Bio Basic Inc. (Toronto, Canada). Liquid paraffin was purchased from Tianjin No. 1 Chemical Reagent Factory (Tianjin, China). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.


## 2.2. Preparation of Chitosan-Coated Alginate/Gelatin BBH Loaded Microspheres

BBH loaded microspheres were prepared by water-in-oil emulsion technique as previously reported [28]. Briefly, water phase containing sodium alginate/gelatin (2 : 3) (5.0% w : v) and BBH (0.5 g) was dissolved in 2% (v/v) acetic acid aqueous solution. Oil phase containing liquid paraffin and emulsifiers (Span 80 and Tween 80, 4 : 1 ratio, v/v) was homogenized under stirred conditions at 40°C. Later, water phase was added to oil phase (1 : 5, v : v) under stirred conditions of 450 rpm at 40°C. The prepared mixture was kept over an ice-water bath for approximately 15 min and then 20 mL of isopropanol was added to the mixture with continuous stirring for 10 min to obtain a stable emulsion system. 4 mL of cross-linking agents (EDC/NHS, 4 : 1, w/w) was dissolved in 50 mM of MES buffer and they were then added to the inverse emulsion with continuous stirring for 1 h in ice-water bath, followed by stirring for 4 h in room temperature. Then, 120 mL of acetone was added to end the cross-linking reaction. The microspheres were collected by filtration. Washing cycles were performed with acetone and isopropanol before redispersion in distilled water and subsequent lyophilization. The prepared microspheres were immersed into the 0.5% chitosan acetate aqueous solution at 30°C for 30 min. Finally, chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin BBH loaded microspheres were collected and washed three times with deionized water. The microspheres were immersed in carbodiimide solution for 12 h and they were then dried at 40°C. Three batches of microspheres were formed.


## 2.3. Characterization of Chitosan-Coated Microspheres

### 2.3.1. SEM Observation of Microspheres

The shape and surface features of microspheres were observed using SEM (Philips XL30, Netherlands). The microspheres were suspended in distilled water and the dispersion was dropped on glass slide and dried at ambient atmosphere. The samples were coated with gold for SEM observation.


### 2.3.2. Particle Size and Distribution Analysis

The microspheres were dispersed in distilled water and the particle size and distribution of microspheres were measured by laser diffractometry using LS230 Coulter (Coulter Co., USA).


### 2.3.3. Drug Entrapment Efficiency and Loading

Drug entrapment efficiency, and loading were determined by dissolving known amount of microspheres in 50 mL of simulated gastric fluid under stirring for 48 h at 37°C. Then, the supernatant was filtered and analyzed using HPLC (Waters 2695 System, Milford, USA). Drug entrapment efficiency and loading were calculated using the following equations:(1)Drug  entrapment  efficiency=actual  BBH  contenttheoreticalBBH  content×100%,Drug  loading=BBH  contentmicrocapsules  weight×100%.


### 2.3.4. Stability Study

The microspheres were stored at60±2°C, 92.5±5% RH, and 4500±500 lx for 10 days without package. Samples were withdrawn at different time and evaluated for appearance and BBH content.


### 2.3.5. Bioadhesion of Chitosan-Coated BBH Loaded Microspheres

The bioadhesion of chitosan-coated BBH loaded microspheres was investigated according to the method previously reported by Rao and Buri [29]. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (weighing 450–500 g) were maintained at standard conditions and fasted overnight with free access to water until experiment. All procedures were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The experimental protocol was approved by the Committee on Animal Research of Zibo Institute for Food and Drug Control.The rats were anaesthetised with 5% chloral hydrate (250 mg/kg, i.p.). Stomach was dissected and rinsed with physiological saline till the mucosa was clean. The tissue was used within 2 h after dissection. Then, the stomach was cut longitudinally, spread, and placed on a microscope slid. 50 mg of uncoated or coated microspheres was placed uniformly on the mucosa of the stomach. The microscope slid was then placed in a desiccator maintained at >80% relative humidity and room temperature. After 20 min, the microscope slid was fixed in a washing jar at an angle of 45°. The stomach mucosa was washed for 5 min with 30 mL of flushing liquid (0.9% NaCl, 0.1 mol/L HCl, pH1.2±0.1) at the rate of 0.1 mL/s using a peristaltic pump. The washings were collected, dried, and weighed. The bioadhesion of stomach was calculated according to the following equation:(2)Bioadhesion%=M-G-mM×100%,where M is the quality of microspheres (50 mg), G is the quality of the dried residue, and m is the quality of the solid in the 30 mL of flushing liquid.


## 2.3.1. SEM Observation of Microspheres

The shape and surface features of microspheres were observed using SEM (Philips XL30, Netherlands). The microspheres were suspended in distilled water and the dispersion was dropped on glass slide and dried at ambient atmosphere. The samples were coated with gold for SEM observation.


## 2.3.2. Particle Size and Distribution Analysis

The microspheres were dispersed in distilled water and the particle size and distribution of microspheres were measured by laser diffractometry using LS230 Coulter (Coulter Co., USA).


## 2.3.3. Drug Entrapment Efficiency and Loading

Drug entrapment efficiency, and loading were determined by dissolving known amount of microspheres in 50 mL of simulated gastric fluid under stirring for 48 h at 37°C. Then, the supernatant was filtered and analyzed using HPLC (Waters 2695 System, Milford, USA). Drug entrapment efficiency and loading were calculated using the following equations:(1)Drug  entrapment  efficiency=actual  BBH  contenttheoreticalBBH  content×100%,Drug  loading=BBH  contentmicrocapsules  weight×100%.


## 2.3.4. Stability Study

The microspheres were stored at60±2°C, 92.5±5% RH, and 4500±500 lx for 10 days without package. Samples were withdrawn at different time and evaluated for appearance and BBH content.


## 2.3.5. Bioadhesion of Chitosan-Coated BBH Loaded Microspheres

The bioadhesion of chitosan-coated BBH loaded microspheres was investigated according to the method previously reported by Rao and Buri [29]. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (weighing 450–500 g) were maintained at standard conditions and fasted overnight with free access to water until experiment. All procedures were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The experimental protocol was approved by the Committee on Animal Research of Zibo Institute for Food and Drug Control.The rats were anaesthetised with 5% chloral hydrate (250 mg/kg, i.p.). Stomach was dissected and rinsed with physiological saline till the mucosa was clean. The tissue was used within 2 h after dissection. Then, the stomach was cut longitudinally, spread, and placed on a microscope slid. 50 mg of uncoated or coated microspheres was placed uniformly on the mucosa of the stomach. The microscope slid was then placed in a desiccator maintained at >80% relative humidity and room temperature. After 20 min, the microscope slid was fixed in a washing jar at an angle of 45°. The stomach mucosa was washed for 5 min with 30 mL of flushing liquid (0.9% NaCl, 0.1 mol/L HCl, pH1.2±0.1) at the rate of 0.1 mL/s using a peristaltic pump. The washings were collected, dried, and weighed. The bioadhesion of stomach was calculated according to the following equation:(2)Bioadhesion%=M-G-mM×100%,where M is the quality of microspheres (50 mg), G is the quality of the dried residue, and m is the quality of the solid in the 30 mL of flushing liquid.


## 2.4.In Vitro Release Studies

The dissolution study was performed using rotating basket method (Sotax AT7, Basel, Switzerland). The microspheres and tablets equivalent to 10 mg BBH were dispersed in 200 mL of simulated gastric fluid and stirred at 50 rpm at37±0.5°C. A 0.5 mL of the suspension was withdrawn at specified time intervals, filtered, and the concentration of the supernatant was analyzed using HPLC. 5 μL of the collected supernatant was injected into a chromatograph (Waters 2695, USA) equipped with a UV detector (Waters 2487) and a reversed phase ProntoSIL 120-5-C18-ace-APS column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, Bischoff Chromatography, Germany). The mobile phase was acetonitrile-water (30 : 70) containing 0.1% of phosphoric acid and 0.05% of triethylamine. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the UV detector was set at a wavelength of 263 nm.


## 2.5.In Vivo Availability Studies

The bioavailability of microspheres was compared with BBH commercial tablets. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (weighing 200–250 g) were randomly divided into two groups of twelve rats each. The rats were fasted overnight with free access to water until administered with microspheres (prepared by dispersing the microspheres in distilled water) or BBH commercial tablets (24 mg BBH/kg).0.5 mL of blood samples was collected from the retinal venous plexus into heparinized Eppendorf tubes at 0.083, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h. Blood samples were immediately centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min and stored at −20°C until UPLC-MS/MS analysis.Tetrahydropalmatine was used as an internal standard at a final concentration of 2 ng/mL. 200μL of acetonitrile-methanol (50 : 50, v/v) solution was added to 50 μL of rat plasma. After vortex mixing for 1 min, the resultant mixture was centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred to a clean tube and 10 μL of supernatant was injected into a Shimadzu LC-20AD system equipped with a binary pump, a micro vacuum degasser, and an autoinjector. The separation was performed on an Agilent ZORBAX XDB-C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 3.5 μm). The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water (A) and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in methanol. The flow gradient was as follows: 0–0.6 min, 90% A; 0.6–1.2 min, 90–2% A; 1.2–3.0 min, 2% A; 3.0–3.1 min, 2–90% A; and 3.1–4.5 min, 90% A, at a flow rate of 0.45 mL/min.The abovementioned UPLC system was connected with an API 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometry system via an ESI interface. The ESI-MS spectra of samples and reference compounds were acquired in positive ionization modes. The set parameters were as follows: the multiple reaction monitoring mode atm/z 336.10 → 292.10 (BBH) andm/z 356.3 → 192.10 (tetrahydropalmatine), curtain gas at 20 psi, ion spray voltage at 5.0 kV, temperature at 500°C, ion source gas1 at 55 psi, and ion source gas 2 at 55 psi.The pharmacokinetic parameters, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach Cmax (Tmax) were obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time data. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. The values of Cmax and AUC were analyzed statistically using analysis of variance after logarithmic transformation. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The relative bioavailability of microspheres was calculated using the following equation: Fr=AUCmicrophere/AUCreference(commercial  tablets).


## 3. Results

SEM photographs showed that particles of alginate/gelatin BBH loaded microspheres with deep elevation on surfaces were spherical on the whole (Figure1(a)). However, after coating with chitosan, the microcapsules were almost spherical with shallow elevation on surfaces (Figure 1(b)). This morphological characterization may be due to ice crystal sublimation in the process of lyophilization, leading to porous sponginess-like surface. This could ensure microspheres with good fluidity and large specific surface, leading to improved drug absorption. Particle distribution of BBH microspheres is shown in Figure 2. The median diameter before and after coating with chitosan was 302.0 μm and 368.2 μm, respectively. This increase of 66.2 μm was considered to be due to the thickness of the coating layer. These two microspheres displayed Gaussian distribution. The entrapment efficiency of BBH microcapsules was found to be 98.92±0.03% with a drug loading of 3.59±0.01%. Bioadhesion percentage of coated microspheres was 91.23%±8.2%, while that of uncoated microspheres was only 21.3%±5.7%. The stability results demonstrated that there was no significant change in the appearance and BBH content after 10 days of exposure to 60°C, 92.5 RH, and 4500 lx.Figure 1
Scanning electron microscopy photographs of (a) alginate/gelatin BBH loaded microspheres and (b) chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin BBH loaded microspheres.Figure 2
Size distribution of (a) alginate/gelatin BBH loaded microspheres and (b) chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin BBH loaded microspheres.
(a) (b)In vitro release behaviors of BBH from chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin microspheres and commercial tablets are shown in Figure 3. In simulated gastric fluid, about 17.62% of the drug loaded onto the microspheres was released in 0.5 h. After 8 hours, the drug release ratio reached 71.29%. The initial burst release was not apparent, which was related to cross-linked microspheres coated with chitosan. The release of BBH was faster in commercial tablets compared to BBH microspheres. About 71.2% of the drug was released in 10 min and 85.4% of the drug was released in 0.5 h, followed by a constant release rate.Figure 3
In vitro release testing of different BBH preparations at 37°C in simulated gastric fluid. The preparations tested were BBH commercial tablets (-■-) and chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin BBH loaded microspheres (-●-).The LC-MS/MS method for the determination and quantitation of BBH in rat plasma was developed and validated. The mean recovery was from 102.1% to 104.1% for 0.5, 5.0, and 40 ng/mL of quality control samples with relative standard deviation (RSD) of less than 5%. The intra- and interday precisions were within 3.0% and 3.5%, respectively, with accuracy from 99.1% to 103.1%. The RSD of repeatability was less than 4.1%. The calibration curve wasY=0.341X+0.00741 (r=0.9995, n=6). The linear range for the determination of BBH was 0.2–50 ng/mL, and limit of detection (S/N > 3) was 0.2 ng/mL.The plasma concentration-time profiles of BBH microspheres and commercial tablets are shown in Figure4. When commercial tablets were given, BBH was undetectable at 24 h. BBH microspheres exhibited a sustained release of BBH over 48 h postfeeding. The drug from microspheres was eliminated slowly compared to that from commercial tablets. The pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, Tmax, and AUC values were 6.5±0.7 ng/mL, 2±0.46 h, and 109.4±0.8 ng·h/mL, respectively, for BBH microspheres and 7.7±0.2 ng/mL, 1±0.37 h, and 43.3±0.3 ng·h/mL, respectively, for commercial tablets. Cmax and Tmax of BBH microspheres were smaller and higher than commercial tablets, respectively. The AUC of BBH microspheres was higher than the commercial tablets by 152.5%, and the bioavailability of BBH microspheres was 2.52 times as much as the commercial tablets. Hence, BBH microspheres might be a promising sustained-release system for the oral delivery of BBH.Figure 4
Plasma concentration profiles of berberine hydrochloride (BBH) after oral administration of chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin BBH loaded microspheres (-■-) and BBH commercial tablets (-●-) in rats (n=4 and 24 mg/kg).


## 4. Discussion

In the present study, water-in-oil emulsion technique was used to prepare BBH loaded microspheres. In microsphere preparation, W/O ratio is a key parameter to be considered to obtain good quality microspheres [30]. The W/O ratio of higher than 10/1 results in excessive hydrogelation, whereas W/O ratio less than 1/10 induces adhesion microspheres. The claimed optimal ratio was between 2/25 and 2/5. To minimize the burst effect of BBH, it would have been preferable to use high W/O ratio according to a reported literature [31]. However, a high W/O ratio often results in nonspherical particles, highly variable in size, and large particle size. Thus, a relatively high W/O ratio of 1/5 was selected in this study. Emulsifiers also play an important role in the high-quality microsphere preparation [32]. Hence, the influence of the type of emulsifier was evaluated with sodium desoxycholate, polyvinyl alcohol, Tween 80, and Span 80. Mixed emulsifier of Tween 80 and Span 80 produced less heterogeneous and less disrupt microspheres. This could be due to the variation in the hydrophilic-lipophilic balance as well as the nature of the surfactant.So far, many chitosan-coated particles have been reported for oral drug delivery. The first improvement of the encapsulation process over our previous technique [33] was the enhancement of reproducibility, which remains a major issue for microsphere manufacturing process [34]. To obtain reproducible batches, the emulsion was made in a temperature-controlled apparatus, as it was very clear that emulsion temperature was a key process parameter determining the overall quality of the microspheres and thus the release patterns [35]. Hence, in the early stage of emulsion, high temperature was used to aid in the uniform dispersion of aqueous phase, which thus accelerates preparation of emulsion system. Later, the emulsion system was transferred to an ice-water bath to enhance shrinking droplets and to reduce the probability of collision and integration of dispersal droplets. Meanwhile, it also reduces the solubility of alginate and gelatin and thus improves the gelation of alginate and gelatin. In view of thermodynamics, low temperature was disadvantageous to obtain long-term stable emulsion system. Hence, dispersant agent isopropanol was added to the emulsion system to further promote the gelation and increase the dispersibility of emulsion system. Then, cross-linking agent was added to solidify the microspheres. Another strategy to obtain reproducible batches was the vigorous stirring of the emulsion at 400 rpm, which allowed a homogeneous emulsion and thus high-quality microsphere batches. The second major improvement of prepared microspheres was the surface with deep elevation which could produce larger interfacial surface area than smooth surface and thus significantly enhance absorption.The bioadhesion percentage of coated BBH loaded microspheres was higher than that of uncoated BBH loaded microspheres. This indicated that coated microspheres showed better bioadhesion properties than uncoated microspheres. Uncoated microspheres were entrapped in mucosa primarily because of their irregular shape unlike the spherical glass beads.The release behaviors of BBH from chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin microspheres suggested that the drug molecules were trapped inside the cross-linked shells and only 17.6% of BBH was released within 30 min. If it was a case of release from the surface, most of the adsorbed drug molecules could be released within 10 min when the microspheres came into contact with the release medium [13, 36]. To restrict the burst effect, several methods were used. First, BBH was purified by recrystallization and then crushed into powder, because optimized milling process could have significant effect on the release profile [37] in particular on the burst effect. Second, drug loading method was optimized, as it could influence the burst effect [30]. Indeed, if saturated aqueous solution of BBH was used as the aqueous phase, drug loading of microspheres might reach up to 9.12%. However, the microspheres showed a significant burst effect. This could be related to a percolation mechanism as previously reported for microparticles loaded with hydrophilic crystals such as cisplatin, at sufficient amounts (>18% w/w) [38].The pharmacokinetic parameters suggested that the bioavailability of BBH was significantly increased in chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin microspheres as compared to commercial tablets. The results demonstrated that chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin BBH loaded microspheres had a better sustained-release profile and better promoted oral absorption of BBH than commercial tablets. This is attributed to the bioadhesive property of chitosan and the advantages of microspheres. Thus, we conclude that a chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin delivery system, that is, a carrier combining alginate/gelatin microspheres and chitosan, is a favorable option for oral administration of BBH.


## 5. Conclusions

Spherical and uniform-sized chitosan-coated alginate/gelatin microspheres with a mean diameter of 368.2μm, drug loading of 3.59±0.01%, andin situ bioadhesion percentage of 91.23%±8.2% can be prepared using W/O emulsion method.In vitro dissolution experiments revealed that the dissolution of BBH from microspheres was slower than commercial tablets, and microspheres slowly released the BBH over 8 h duration. Meanwhile,in vivo studies revealed that the bioavailability of BBH microspheres as compared to commercial tablets was 252.5%. Cumulatively, the results suggested that BBH microspheres could be used as a possible alternative to traditional oral formulations of BBH to improve its bioavailability.



---

*Source: 4235832-2016-10-10.xml*