# Morphological Transformation and Photophysical Properties of Polyfluorene-Based Luminescent Rod-Coil Block Copolymers

Authors: Yang-Yen Yu; Chun-Yen Huang
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The morphologies, synthesis, and photophysical characterizations of poly[2,7-(9,9-dihexylfluorene)]-block-poly(2-(diethylamino)ethylmethacrylate) using amphiphilic rod-coil (PF-b-PDEAEMA) were demonstrated. The aggregation morphologies of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 were manipulated by tuning the selectivity of mixed THF/methanol solvents with methanol contents ranging from 0 to 90 vol%. The morphological transformation of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 caused significant changes in its photophysical properties, including absorption, fluorescence spectra, and fluorescence quenching. Moreover, the thermal stability of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 was investigated by varying the annealing temperature. The results of the present study suggest that the solvent selectivity influences the photophysical properties and aggregation morphologies of rod-coil block copolymers in solid and solution states.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The potential of self-assembling amphiphilic rod-coil block copolymers in developing polymeric materials with novel supramolecular nanostructures and tunable physical properties has been demonstrated [1–4]. Such copolymers, which comprise mutually repulsive hydrophobic rod-like and hydrophilic coil-like segments, exhibit various nanoscale aggregation morphologies, such as spherical, lamellar, cylindrical, and worm-like structures [5–8]. The physical and optical properties and aggregation morphologies of rod-coil block copolymers can be manipulated by employing various driving forces, including relative block length, block polarity, mixed solvent selectivity, and temperature. Recently, block rod-coil copolymers have been investigated for many potential applications, such as in realizing drug diversity and in sensing [9–11], owing to their useful properties and morphological transformation.In particular, block rod-coil copolymers containing semiconductingπ-conjugated rods are considered promising candidates for low-cost, large-area, and flexible optoelectronic applications [12–16]. Conjugated rod-coil block copolymers exhibit unusual photophysical characteristics and may serve as novel optoelectronic materials. For example, Jenekhe and Chen demonstrated that poly(phenylquinoline)-b-poly(styrene), a rod-coil copolymer, which showed an unusual honeycomb morphology, enhanced the solubility of fullerenes, such as C60 and C70, by encapsulating the fullerenes in the block conjugated copolymer aggregates [16].Polyfluorene (PF) derivatives are high-performance blue light-emitting materials used in polymeric light-emitting diodes because they have a high fluorescence quantum yield and strong thermal and chemical stability [10, 17]. Several research groups have reported rod-coil block copolymers that are based on fluorene segments [18–21]. Rigid fluorene segments with flexible coil chains can be incorporated to not only manipulate the photophysical properties and aggregation morphologies of fluorene-based block copolymers but also increase the solubility of fluorene-based block copolymers in hydrophilic solvents, further improving processability. The potential biological applications, such as pH and DNA sensing, of block rod-coil copolymers with PF as rods and poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethylmethacrylate) (PDMAEMA) as coils have been reported [9, 22]; the highly hydrophilic PDMAEMA forms an ionic state with anions. However, the effect of the morphological transformation of di-block rod-coil copolymers composed of PF and PDMAEMA on their optoelectronic characteristics in solution and solid states has not been fully explored yet.In this study, we demonstrated the synthesis, aggregation morphologies, and photophysical properties of amphiphilic poly[2,7-(9,9-dihexylfluorene)]-block-poly[2-(diethylamino)ethylmethacrylate] (PF-b-PDEAEMA) rod-coil di-block copolymers. PF-b-PDEAEMA was prepared through atom transfer radical polymerization, as illustrated in Figure 1. By using solvents with different selectivities, namely, tetrahydrofuran (THF) and methanol (MeOH), various aggregation morphologies of the block copolymers were observed in thin films and in a dilute solution through atomic force microscopy (AFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), respectively. Furthermore, the photophysical properties of the block copolymers with various MeOH contents were characterized through UV-vis optical absorption and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. In addition, their self-assembly behaviors are discussed in this paper.Figure 1
Chemical structure of rod-coil di-block PF-b-PDEAEMA.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

9,9-Dihexyl-2,7-dibromofluorene (PF, Aldrich, 97%), 2-(diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DEAEMA, TCI, 98.5%), ethyl ether anhydrous (TEDIA), copper(I) bromide (CuBr, Aldrich, 99.999%), anhydrous THF (Echo), N,N,N′,N′,N′′-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA, Aldrich, 99%), anhydrous MeOH (Mallinckrodt), n-hexane (TEDIA, 95%), aluminum oxide (50–200 microns, Acros), and chloroform-d (99.8 atm% D, Aldrich) were used as received to prepare the PF-b-PDEAEMA copolymers.


### 2.2. Preparation of PF-Br Macroinitiator and PF-b-PDEAEMA

First, a-{4-[2-(2-bromo-2-methylpropoyloxy)methyl]phenyl}-bromo-poly[2,7-(9,9- dihexylfluorene)] (PF-Br) was synthesized through the Suzuki coupling reaction [23, 24]. The resulting mixture was reacted with 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide to obtain PF-Br, which was dried under vacuum overnight. PF-b-PDEAEMA (Figure 1) was prepared as follows: 79.2 mg of PF-Br (1 mmol), 5.2 mg of CuBr (2 mmol), and 1516 mL of DEAEMA (500 mmol) were added to a dry round-bottom flask, and the system was maintained under vacuum for 10 min. A solution of pentamethyl-diethylenetriamine (PMDETA, 8 mL, 2 mmol) in 0.7 mL of anisole was added to the round-bottom flask under nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was degassed three times, filled with nitrogen, stirred at ambient temperature for 30 min, and immersed in an oil bath at 110°C for 24 h. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was passed through an Al2O3 column to remove the copper catalyst, precipitated into an excess amount of n-hexane, and filtered; the product was dried under vacuum at 30°C to obtain 300 mg of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 yellow solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d (ppm): 0.78–0.98 (3 H, –CH2C(CH3)–), 1.78–1.91 (2 H, –CH2C(CH3)–), 2.41–2.59 (10H, –N(CH2CH3)2), 2.69 (2 H, –OCH2CH2N(CH2CH3)2), 3.98 (2 H, –OCH2CH2N –(CH2CH3)2), 7.25–7.79 (10 H, fluorene aromatic protons and phenyl end group) (Figure 2).Figure 2
1NMR spectra of rod-coil di-block PF13-b-PDEAEMA100.


### 2.3. Preparation of PF-b-PDEAEMA Aggregates in Solution

PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 aggregates in solution were prepared by dissolving the polymer in THF and subsequently adding MeOH at volume ratios of 0%, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 90%; the polymer concentration was maintained at 0.1 wt% in the solution.


## 2.1. Materials

9,9-Dihexyl-2,7-dibromofluorene (PF, Aldrich, 97%), 2-(diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DEAEMA, TCI, 98.5%), ethyl ether anhydrous (TEDIA), copper(I) bromide (CuBr, Aldrich, 99.999%), anhydrous THF (Echo), N,N,N′,N′,N′′-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA, Aldrich, 99%), anhydrous MeOH (Mallinckrodt), n-hexane (TEDIA, 95%), aluminum oxide (50–200 microns, Acros), and chloroform-d (99.8 atm% D, Aldrich) were used as received to prepare the PF-b-PDEAEMA copolymers.


## 2.2. Preparation of PF-Br Macroinitiator and PF-b-PDEAEMA

First, a-{4-[2-(2-bromo-2-methylpropoyloxy)methyl]phenyl}-bromo-poly[2,7-(9,9- dihexylfluorene)] (PF-Br) was synthesized through the Suzuki coupling reaction [23, 24]. The resulting mixture was reacted with 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide to obtain PF-Br, which was dried under vacuum overnight. PF-b-PDEAEMA (Figure 1) was prepared as follows: 79.2 mg of PF-Br (1 mmol), 5.2 mg of CuBr (2 mmol), and 1516 mL of DEAEMA (500 mmol) were added to a dry round-bottom flask, and the system was maintained under vacuum for 10 min. A solution of pentamethyl-diethylenetriamine (PMDETA, 8 mL, 2 mmol) in 0.7 mL of anisole was added to the round-bottom flask under nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was degassed three times, filled with nitrogen, stirred at ambient temperature for 30 min, and immersed in an oil bath at 110°C for 24 h. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was passed through an Al2O3 column to remove the copper catalyst, precipitated into an excess amount of n-hexane, and filtered; the product was dried under vacuum at 30°C to obtain 300 mg of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 yellow solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d (ppm): 0.78–0.98 (3 H, –CH2C(CH3)–), 1.78–1.91 (2 H, –CH2C(CH3)–), 2.41–2.59 (10H, –N(CH2CH3)2), 2.69 (2 H, –OCH2CH2N(CH2CH3)2), 3.98 (2 H, –OCH2CH2N –(CH2CH3)2), 7.25–7.79 (10 H, fluorene aromatic protons and phenyl end group) (Figure 2).Figure 2
1NMR spectra of rod-coil di-block PF13-b-PDEAEMA100.


## 2.3. Preparation of PF-b-PDEAEMA Aggregates in Solution

PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 aggregates in solution were prepared by dissolving the polymer in THF and subsequently adding MeOH at volume ratios of 0%, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 90%; the polymer concentration was maintained at 0.1 wt% in the solution.


## 3. Characterization

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the prepared copolymers were obtained with a KBr pellet by using a PerkinElmer Spectrum spectrophotometer.1H-NMR spectra of the prepared polymers were obtained using a JEOL EX-400 spectrometer. Molecular weight was determined using a GPC instrument equipped with a refractive index detector (Schambeck SFD GmbH, model RI 2000), a Lab Alliance solvent delivery system, and a GPC column (PLgel 5 μm mixed-C and D). Calibration was achieved by injecting a polystyrene standard diluted to 0.5 wt% in THF (1 mL/min) at 40°C. Thermal analyses were conducted on a differential scanning calorimeter (TA Instruments, TA Q20)—with a heating cycle from room temperature to 200°C at a heating rate of 20°C/min—and a thermogravimetric analyzer (TA Instruments, TA Q50) with a heating range of room temperature to 900°C at 20°C/min.The PF-b-PDEAEMA aggregate morphologies were characterized through TEM by using a JEOL 1210 operating at an acceleration voltage of 100 kV. A drop of the aggregate dispersion was cast onto a 200-mesh copper TEM grid deposited with carbon and dried under vacuum before imaging. The deuterated solvent used for obtaining the spectra was chloroform-d. The AFM data was obtained in the tapping mode on a Nanoscope DI III multimode instrument. UV-vis spectra were obtained from polymer thin films prepared on glass through spin-coating at a speed of approximately 1000 rpm by using a Jasco Model V-650 spectrometer. PL spectra were obtained using a Horiba Jobin Yvon Fluoromax-4 Spectrofluorometer with 450 nm excitation wavelength.


## 4. Results and Discussion

Figure3 shows the FTIR spectra of (a) PF-ph-CH2OH macroinitiator and (b) PF-Br macroinitiator. The broad characteristic band from 2980 to 2835 cm−1 was attributed to benzene. The peak at 1754 cm−1 is attributable to C=O, suggesting the hydroxyl group of replaced 2-bromoisobutyrate. Figure 3 is a plot of the gel permeation chromatographic analysis of the PF macroinitiator, where PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 was added to a 2% THF solution at 1 mL min−1. The retention time of the PF macroinitiator reduced significantly with the addition of DMAEMA monomers, indicating the successful polymerization of the DMAEMA monomer into the PF macroinitiator. In addition, the PDI of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 estimated through GPC ranged from 1.3 to 1.5. The thermal properties of the PF macroinitiator and PF-b-PDEAEMA were estimated through thermogravimetric analysis (TGA; Figure 4). The thermal degradation temperatures of the PF macroinitiator and PF-b-PDEAEMA (weight loss of 5%) were 400°C and 343°C, respectively, suggesting that the thermal stability of PF decreased with the incorporation of PDEAEMA.Figure 3
FTIR spectra of (a) PF-ph-CH2OH macroinitiator and (b) PF-Br macroinitiator.Figure 4
TGA spectra of (a) PF-Br macroinitiator and (b) PF13-b-PDEAEMA100.The micellar aggregation of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 for various selectivities of THF/MeOH was investigated through TEM. THF is a good solvent for PF but a selective solvent for PDEAEMA. By contrast, MeOH is a good solvent for PDEAEMA but a selective solvent for PF. Figure 5 shows the aggregation behaviors of PF-b-PDEAEMA in a mixed THF/MeOH solution for MeOH contents of 0–90 vol%. Spherical micelles were observed in pure THF solution (Figure 5(a)). THF acted as a good solvent for PF but a poor solvent for PDEAEMA, leading to the extension of PF chains as the corona and the aggregation of PDEAEMA as the core. When the MeOH content was increased to 10 vol%, the spherical micelles preferentially aggregated as a bundle with worm-like morphology, because this morphology efficiently reduces the high interfacial energy of PF. When the MeOH content was increased to 25 vol%, the worm-like micelles acted as dendritic structures, and the size of the micelles decreased. On increasing the MeOH content to 50%, ribbon-like micelles were observed (Figure 5(d)), presumably because, for a THF : MeOH ratio of 50 : 50, MeOH increases the interfacial energy between the PF corona and the PDEAEMA core, leading to a ribbon-like morphology that reduces the increased interfacial energy. When the MeOH content exceeded that of THF, the ribbon-like micelles transformed to spherical aggregates, presumably because the mixed solution consisting of a large amount of MeOH causes the stretching of hydrophilic PDEAEMA and PF aggregation. Therefore, the micelles comprising PDEAEMA cores and PF coronas preferentially inverted to form micelles comprising PF cores and PDEAEMA coronas when the MeOH content was high (Figures 5(e) and 5(f)). These observations suggest that solvent selectivity is a critical factor influencing the aggregation morphology of di-block copolymers in solution.Figure 5
TEM images of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 aggregates in dilute MeOH/THF solution with MeOH content of (a) 0, (b) 10, (c) 25, (d) 50, (e) 75, and (f) 90 vol%, respectively.
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)The aggregation morphologies of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 in the solid state were also investigated through AFM. Figure 6 presents AFM images of thin films of PF-b-PDEAEMA obtained from dilute THF/MeOH solutions with various MeOH contents. At high MeOH content, the AFM images of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 revealed spheres and worm-like micelles and ribbon-like morphologies, which are consistent with the TEM images. These observations suggest that the morphological transformation of PF-b-PDEAEMA induced by solvent selectivity can occur in the solid and solution states.Figure 6
AFM images of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 aggregates in dilute MeOH/THF solution with MeOH content of (a) 0, (b) 10, (c) 25, (d) 50, (e) 75, and (f) 90 vol%, respectively.
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)Figure7 shows the UV and PL spectra of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 in a dilute THF/MeOH solution with MeOH content ranging from 0 to 90 vol%. The maximum absorption wavelength of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 in pure THF solution was 370 nm. On increasing the MeOH content to 75 vol%, the maximum absorption wavelength of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 exhibited a hypsochromic shift from 370 to 363 nm, presumably because the aggregation induced by the selective solvent makes the PF segments less coplanar, leading to a decrease in the conjugated length [12]. This hypsochromic shift is commonly attributed to H-type aggregation, in which the conjugation segments are oriented in parallel. In the PL spectra, the small conjugation length similarly caused fluorescence quenching and lower structure emission of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100[9, 12]. Thus, the fluorescence intensity of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 decreased significantly with an increase in the amount of the selective solvent. The hypsochromic shift and quenching of the emission spectra indicate a typical H-type stacking of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 in the MeOH/THF solution. Moreover, the PL quantum yields of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 decreased from 73% in pure THF solution to 62, 60, 57, 48, and 43% in 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 90 vol.% mixed MeOH/THF solvents, respectively. The degree of hypsochromic shift and the decrease in PL quantum yield increased as the length of PDEAEMA coils and the content of the poor solvent increased, indicating that photophysical properties can be manipulated by the coil length of the PDEAEMA block and the selectivity of the solvents.Figure 7
Optical UV and PL spectra of PF-b-PDEAEMA in dilute MeOH/THF solution with MeOH content ranging from 0 to 90 vol%.Figure8 shows the thin-film PL spectra of PF-Br macroinitiator annealed for a long duration at 120°C. The PL emission of PF-Br macroinitiator varied only slightly with annealing time, suggesting the high thermal stability of PF-Br macroinitiator compared with the PF-Br macroinitiator. During annealing, enhanced emission in the 500–600 nm range is commonly attributed to the formation of fluorenone or excimers [25, 26]. To investigate the enhanced PL emission, we employed infrared spectroscopy to determine the thermal stability of the PF-Br macroinitiator (Figure 9). After high-temperature annealing for a long duration, the peak of the PF-Br macroinitiator at 1754 cm−1 increased remarkably; this is attributable to the appearance of fluorenone. Therefore, the enhanced emission of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 in the 500–600 nm range is attributable primarily to the formation of fluorenone. In comparison with the PF-Br macroinitiator, as shown in our previous study, PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 exhibited higher thermal stability because of the di-block architecture, which can suppress the formation of fluorenone during annealing.Figure 8
PL spectra of PF-Br macroinitiator thin film annealed for different durations at 120°C.Figure 9
FTIR spectra of PF-Br macroinitiator thin film annealed at R.T., 120°C, and 240°C.


## 5. Conclusion

The morphologies, synthesis, and photophysical characterizations of amphiphilic rod-coil PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 were demonstrated. A variety of morphologies, including spheres, worm-like micelles, ribbon-like micelles and inverted spheres, were obtained after tuning the selectivity of mixed THF/MeOH solvents. The morphological transformation caused significant variations in the absorption, fluorescence spectra, and fluorescence quenching of rod-coil copolymers. The hypsochromic shifting and PL quenching of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 were influenced largely by the selective solvent content (MeOH), presumably because of H-type aggregation. Furthermore, the di-block structure of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 suppressed the formation of fluorenone and afforded higher thermal stability in comparison with PF-Br macroinitiator. The results of the present study suggest the effect of solvent selectivity on the photophysical properties of rod-coil block copolymers. The PL quantum yields of PF13-b-PDEAEMA100 decreased from 73% in pure THF solution to 62, 60, 57, 48, and 43% in 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 90 vol.% mixed MeOH/THF solvents, respectively.



---

*Source: 4041837-2016-10-17.xml*