# Age and Sex Specific Reference Intervals for Modifiable Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Diseases for Gujarati Asian Indians

Authors: Sibasis Sahoo; Komal H. Shah; Ashwati R. Konat; Kamal H. Sharma; Payal Tripathi
Journal: International Journal of Chronic Diseases
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Objective. We aimed to establish age and sex specific percentile reference data for cardiovascular risk factors such as lipids, sugar, blood pressure, and BMI in apparently healthy and disease-free Gujarati population.Methods. In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 3265 apparently healthy and disease-free individuals of both genders residing in Gujarat state. Fasting samples of blood were used for biochemical estimations of lipids and sugar. The measurement of BMI and blood pressure was also done according to the standard guidelines. Age and gender specific 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles were obtained.Results. The mean values of lipids, sugar, blood pressure, and BMI were significantly (p
<
0.001) higher in males as compared to female population. Age-wise distribution trends showed increase in the risk factors from the 2nd decade until the 5th to 6th decade in most of the cases, where loss of premenopausal protection in females was also observed. Specific trends according to gender and age were observed in percentile values of various parameters.Conclusion. The outcome of current study will contribute significantly to proposing clinically important reference values of various lipids, sugar, blood pressure, and BMI that could be used to screen the asymptomatic Gujarati Indian population with a propensity of developing dyslipidemia, diabetes, blood pressure, and obesity.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

South Asians, especially Indians, are group of communities bearing genetically diverse ethnic characteristics and are passing through epidemic health shift due to urbanization [1]. This leads to a marked increase in the incidence of noncommunicable diseases such as cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), which are subjected to race-ethnic diversity and are longitudinally related to the classical risk profile of the particular community [2]. Mortality and morbidity statistics of the last few decades had reported substantial increase and regional variation in cardiovascular epidemic trends in India [3]. Hence, it is noteworthy that despite similar risk factor profile the prediction and interpretation of mortality and morbidity in Indians are prone to ethnic and geographic variations. Socioeconomic status and presence of modifiable risk factors such as individual life style factors, lipid levels, diabetes, and hypertension are noted as the proximate/primordial determinants of CVDs [4].The circulating lipid levels provide substantially good evidence of progressive atherosclerosis in asymptomatic individuals [5, 6]. Reports from various individual studies have documented steep rise in mean values of Total Cholesterol (TC), Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (non-HDL-C), and Triglyceride (TG) and fall in HDL-C in Indians [7]. A population based survey had reported a great degree of variation in lipid associated allele frequencies across multiple racial and ethnic population [8]. Moreover, the evaluation of ethnicity based factors on lipid levels in various communities was recommended by Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (NCEP-ATP III) also [9]. Hence, expert panels from various regions of world have established well-defined guidelines for reference values of lipids, and following this in India also various states have proposed the reference ranges for lipids exclusive for particular geographic and ethnic population [10–12]. In the same manner, racial disparities in diabetes, hypertension, and obesity are reported by many.Gujarat is a rich state located in the western region of India. Numerous studies conducted on native and migrated Gujarati populations have reported that this community possesses different cardiovascular risk factor profile as compared to other ethnic groups [13, 14]. Apart from the fact that it has the highest number of newly diagnosed diabetic population, it also has considerably high incidence of smokeless tobacco consumption, obesity, and dyslipidemias [15–17]. The earlier attempt of comparing the mean values of lipid profile components of healthy Gujaratis with other Indian communities showed a great degree of variations between these groups [18]. Moreover, the age and sex specific representative percentile reference data for lipids, sugar, hypertension, and Body Mass Index (BMI) of Gujarati population is lacking. Keeping in mind the lacuna of research, current study was designed to establish the percentile values for serum lipids and sugar, blood pressure, and BMI in healthy Gujarati male and female in order to provide reference data of clinical relevance.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. Design and Data Collection

This cross-sectional study was conducted in September 2013 at U. N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Center which was approved and cleared by institutional ethics committee. In the current investigation, 3265 individuals of both genders, who were apparently healthy, free from any illness and major complications or surgery for the last three months with normal BP, ECG, ECHO, and stress test, were selected. The sample was taken from the self-reported healthy population who visited the hospital during awareness camp. The population was from various regions of Gujarat state. The demographic details of the population such as age, sex, and disease history were recorded for all the individuals. The subjects were asked to relax and then the blood pressure was measured for three times and the average was taken into account. All clinical investigations were conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.


### 2.2. Laboratory Tests

Fasting serum lipids and glucose concentrations were measured by International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) approved enzymatic methods using commercially available kit on autoanalyzer (ARCHITECT PLUS ci4100, Germany). Lipids levels were classified according to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) and Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines. Blood pressure of the population was measured according to earlier reported guidelines [19]. Individuals having BMI greater than 30 were considered to be obese as per WHO standards [20].


### 2.3. Quality Control

The accuracy and precision of laboratory parameters were achieved by participating in the external and internal quality control programs of CMC, Vellore, and Bio-Rad. To maintain the reproducibility and reliability of the test, the quality assessment programs were routinely practiced and accordingly the values were standardized for mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD). For internal quality control, the accuracy of reports was tested by retesting the same sample within the hospital. Performance of all results was done following quality control program based on west grade QC rule like 1-2s as warning rule and 2-2s, 1-3s, and 1-4s as rejection rule. Test performance was started with acceptable QC range. In case of rejection (QC outlier), recalibration and use of fresh control analysis were done. For external quality control, the sample was sent to reputed NABL accredited laboratories for interlab comparison and verification of accuracy of the reports. In addition, the participation in periodic EQAS Programs for Haematology, Clinical Chemistry and Immunoassay was done on the basis of AIIMS, Delhi, Bio-Rad, USA, respectively. The data obtained from everyday quality control check was expressed in terms of SD and Coefficient of Variation (CV) and is presented in Table1.Table 1
Comparison of quality control material at levels I and II from Bio-Rad with the mean and percentage of Coefficient of Variations obtained from laboratory.
Analyte
Reference mean
Mean obtained
% of CV
Level I
Level II
Level I
Level II
Level I
Level II
TC (mg/dL)
249.6
104.4
250.1
103.9
3.4
0.92
TG (mg/dL)
182.5
95.9
182.3
95.2
1.4
1.06
HDL-C (mg/dL)
65.4
26.9
65.2
26.5
2.5
1.96
Blood sugar (mg/dL)
297.9
81.8
297.6
81.5
3.3
3.3
Level I: Bio-Rad control (abnormal); level II: Bio-Rad control (normal); CV: Coefficient of Variation; TC: Total Cholesterol; TG: Triglyceride; HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.


### 2.4. Statistical Analysis

All collected data were analyzed by SPSS v. 20 (Chicago, IL, USA). Distribution analysis showed that most of the parameters follow non-Gaussian distribution. Mean, median, and percentile data of 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th were calculated for the values of lipids, glucose, blood pressure, and BMI.


## 2.1. Design and Data Collection

This cross-sectional study was conducted in September 2013 at U. N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Center which was approved and cleared by institutional ethics committee. In the current investigation, 3265 individuals of both genders, who were apparently healthy, free from any illness and major complications or surgery for the last three months with normal BP, ECG, ECHO, and stress test, were selected. The sample was taken from the self-reported healthy population who visited the hospital during awareness camp. The population was from various regions of Gujarat state. The demographic details of the population such as age, sex, and disease history were recorded for all the individuals. The subjects were asked to relax and then the blood pressure was measured for three times and the average was taken into account. All clinical investigations were conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.


## 2.2. Laboratory Tests

Fasting serum lipids and glucose concentrations were measured by International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) approved enzymatic methods using commercially available kit on autoanalyzer (ARCHITECT PLUS ci4100, Germany). Lipids levels were classified according to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) and Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines. Blood pressure of the population was measured according to earlier reported guidelines [19]. Individuals having BMI greater than 30 were considered to be obese as per WHO standards [20].


## 2.3. Quality Control

The accuracy and precision of laboratory parameters were achieved by participating in the external and internal quality control programs of CMC, Vellore, and Bio-Rad. To maintain the reproducibility and reliability of the test, the quality assessment programs were routinely practiced and accordingly the values were standardized for mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD). For internal quality control, the accuracy of reports was tested by retesting the same sample within the hospital. Performance of all results was done following quality control program based on west grade QC rule like 1-2s as warning rule and 2-2s, 1-3s, and 1-4s as rejection rule. Test performance was started with acceptable QC range. In case of rejection (QC outlier), recalibration and use of fresh control analysis were done. For external quality control, the sample was sent to reputed NABL accredited laboratories for interlab comparison and verification of accuracy of the reports. In addition, the participation in periodic EQAS Programs for Haematology, Clinical Chemistry and Immunoassay was done on the basis of AIIMS, Delhi, Bio-Rad, USA, respectively. The data obtained from everyday quality control check was expressed in terms of SD and Coefficient of Variation (CV) and is presented in Table1.Table 1
Comparison of quality control material at levels I and II from Bio-Rad with the mean and percentage of Coefficient of Variations obtained from laboratory.
Analyte
Reference mean
Mean obtained
% of CV
Level I
Level II
Level I
Level II
Level I
Level II
TC (mg/dL)
249.6
104.4
250.1
103.9
3.4
0.92
TG (mg/dL)
182.5
95.9
182.3
95.2
1.4
1.06
HDL-C (mg/dL)
65.4
26.9
65.2
26.5
2.5
1.96
Blood sugar (mg/dL)
297.9
81.8
297.6
81.5
3.3
3.3
Level I: Bio-Rad control (abnormal); level II: Bio-Rad control (normal); CV: Coefficient of Variation; TC: Total Cholesterol; TG: Triglyceride; HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.


## 2.4. Statistical Analysis

All collected data were analyzed by SPSS v. 20 (Chicago, IL, USA). Distribution analysis showed that most of the parameters follow non-Gaussian distribution. Mean, median, and percentile data of 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th were calculated for the values of lipids, glucose, blood pressure, and BMI.


## 3. Results

The overall results obtained from the current investigation are presented in Table2 as mean ± SD and median of lipid profile, glucose, blood pressure, and BMI in Gujarati Indian population.Table 2
Mean and median values of lipid profile, sugar, blood pressure, and BMI in Gujarati population.
Variable
Total
Male
Female
TC (mg/dL)
Mean ± SD
185.33 ± 39.24
188.48 ± 39.20
181.55 ± 38.93
Median
182
187
178
TG (mg/dL)
Mean ± SD
115.59 ± 63.47
127.91 ± 71.44
100.63 ± 48.18
Median
99
110
88
HDL-C (mg/dL)
Mean ± SD
43.7 ± 9.87
40.56 ± 8.81
47.52 ± 9.68
Median
43
40
47
LDL-C (mg/dL)
Mean ± SD
118.5 ± 33.45
122.34 ± 32.89
113.89 ± 33.54
Median
116
121.2
110
LDL-C/HDL-C
Mean ± SD
2.84 ± 1.02
3.12 ± 1.01
2.49 ± 0.88
Median
2.71
3.05
2.37
TC/HDL-C
Mean ± SD
4.42 ± 1.40
4.81 ± 1.46
3.94 ± 1.07
Median
4.26
4.68
3.77
VLDL (mg/dL)
Mean ± SD
23.11 ± 12.69
25.58 ± 14.28
20.12 ± 9.63
Median
19.8
22
17.6
TL (mg/dL)
Mean ± SD
644.62 ± 88.02
656.96 ± 95.46
629.72 ± 75.45
Median
629
641.5
617
Blood sugar (mg/dL)
Mean ± SD
86.13 ± 23.71
88.64 ± 25.12
83.08 ± 21.49
Median
83
85
81
SBP (mm/Hg)
Mean ± SD
130.45 ± 18.73
133.74 ± 17.97
126.47 ± 18.87
Median
130
130
122
DBP (mm/Hg)
Mean ± SD
82.57 ± 10.61
84.14 ± 10.55
80.67 ± 10.37
Median
80
82
80
BMI (kg/m2)
Mean ± SD
26.87 ± 66.52
27.09 ± 44.67
26.61 ± 85.88
Median
24.12
24.16
24.05
TC: Total Cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; VLDL: Very Low Density Lipoprotein; TL: Total Lipid; SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure; BMI: Body Mass Index.
Data was expressed as mean ± SD. Significance was obtained between males and females using Mann-WhitneyU Test. Level of significance was accepted at p
<
0.05 level.Our results showed mean ± SD of cholesterol to be185.33
±
39.24 mg/dL and Triglyceride in the studied population was found to be 115.59
±
63.47 mg/dL. The mean ± SD was 118.5
±
33.45 mg/dL for LDL-C and 43.7
±
9.87 mg/dL for HDL-C and 23.11
±
12.69 mg/dL for VLDL. The mean reference values obtained for TL, LDL-C/HDL-C, and TC/HDL-C were 644.62
±
88.02, 2.84
±
1.02, and 4.42
±
1.4 mg/dL, respectively. In the current study cohort females showed superior lipid profile (TC: 181.55
±
38.93 versus 188.48
±
39.2; TG: 100.63
±
48.18 versus 127.91
±
71.44; HDL-C: 47.52
±
9.68 versus 40.56
±
8.81; LDL-C: 113.89
±
33.54 versus 122.34
±
32.89; VLDL: 20.12
±
9.63 versus 25.58
±
14.28; TL: 629.72
±
75.45 versus 656.96
±
95.46; LDL-C/HDL-C: 2.49
±
0.88 versus 3.12
±
1.01; TC/HDL-C: 3.94
±
1.07 versus 4.81
±
1.46), glucose (83.08
±
21.49 versus 88.64
±
25.12), blood pressure (SBP: 126.47
±
18.87 versus 133.74
±
17.97; DBP: 80.67
±
10.37 versus 84.14
±
10.55), and BMI (26.61
±
85.88 versus 27.09
±
44.67) as compared to males, which was highly significant (p
<
0.001; Table 2).The percentile limits from 5th to 95th for various lipids, glucose, and blood pressure according to gender tabulated in Table3 show higher cutoff values of all the variables in males as compared to females except for slight elevation in BMI levels in higher percentile values. Age-wise distribution trends analysis showed steep increase in the levels of lipids, glucose, blood pressure, and obesity from the 2nd decade till the 5th to 6th decade in most of the cases (Table 4), indicating natural ageing itself as one of the risk factors. In contrast to others, the level of HDL-C was found to increase with the advancing of age. The 5th to the 95th percentile values of lipids, glucose, SBP, DBP, and BMI in various age groups were also analyzed (Table 5). Most of the variables achieved stable levels after the 5th decade and in some cases a decline was observed after the 6th decade of life.Table 3
Percentile values of lipid profile, sugar, blood pressure, and BMI in population.
n
5th percentile
25th percentile
50th percentile
75th percentile
95th percentile
97th percentile
TC (mg/dL)
Men
1789
128
161
187
213.5
255
268.3
Women
1476
127
154.25
178
204
250
262
TG (mg/dL)
Men
1789
59
83
110
152
257.5
293.5
Women
1476
50.85
68
88
119
194.3
214
HDL-C (mg/dL)
Men
1789
29
35
40
45
55
58.3
Women
1476
33
41
47
53
65
67
LDL-C (mg/dL)
Men
1789
71
99
121
142
178
188.3
Women
1476
66.85
89
110
134
174
183
LDL-C/HDL-C
Men
1789
1.64
2.4
3.05
3.76
4.8
5.04
Women
1476
1.25
1.83
2.37
3.02
4.08
4.39
TC/HDL-C
Men
1789
2.97
3.87
4.68
5.58
7.05
7.47
Women
1476
2.5
3.16
3.77
4.6
5.91
6.26
VLDL (mg/dL)
Men
1789
12
17
22
30
51.5
58.3
Women
1476
10
14
18
24
39
43
TL (mg/dL)
Men
1789
540
592
641
701
830
865
Women
1476
531
577
617
672
772.15
799.69
Blood sugar (mg/dL)
Men
1789
65
76
85
94
120
139
Women
1476
62
73
81
89
108
115
SBP (mm/Hg)
Men
1789
110
120
130
142
168
176
Women
1476
100
112
122
136
162
176
DBP (mm/Hg)
Men
1789
70
80
82
90
100
100.6
Women
1476
70
70
80
88
100
100
BMI (kg/m2)
Men
1789
17
22
24
27
32
34
Women
1476
17
20
24
27
33
35
TC: Total Cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; VLDL: Very Low Density Lipoprotein; TL: Total Lipid; SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure; BMI: Body Mass Index. Data are expressed as the 5th to 97th percentile of median.Table 4
Decade-wise percentile values of lipid profile, sugar, blood pressure, and BMI in Gujarati population.
20–29
30–39
40–49
50–59
60–69
>70
TC (mg/dL)
Total
161.29 ±  30.64
181.18 ± 178
193.10 ± 37.01
201.40  ±  38.81
201.31 ± 41.98
197.98 ± 37.94
Male
165.93 ±  32.64
187.38 ± 37.99
193.43 ± 38.89
197.94  ±  38.69
195.83 ± 40.28
193.91 ± 33.42
Female
158.15 ±  28.83
172.89 ± 30.15
192.70 ± 34.64
206.90  ±  38.51
213.04 ± 43.49
219.22 ± 53.58
TG (mg/dL)
Total
89.7 ± 42.60
116.05 ± 71.59
122.85 ± 66.11
131.56 ± 65.81
127.38 ± 58.36
128.28 ± 60.26
Male
106.09 ±  50.87
131.09 ± 82.10
133.23 ± 76.71
138.90  ±  73.11
124.34 ± 40.28
124.65 ± 61.63
Female
78.63 ±  31.50
95.95 ± 47.68
110.30 ± 47.54
119.87  ±  50.27
134.21 ± 62.95
147.22 ± 51.47
HDL-C (mg/dL)
Total
45.43 ± 10.56
42.18 ± 8.72
43.37 ± 9.34
43.44 ± 9.24
43.93 ± 11.93
44.12 ± 10.39
Male
40.30 ±  8.22
39.56 ± 7.62
40.15 ± 7.89
40.87  ±  8.49
42.58 ± 12.88
43.08 ± 9.91
Female
48.98 ±  10.57
45.69 ± 8.89
47.26 ± 9.48
47.51  ±  8.95
46.97 ± 8.75
49.55 ± 11.72
LDL-C (mg/dL)
Total
97.91 ± 26.15
115.78 ± 29.61
125.16 ± 31.80
131.64 ± 33.89
131.72 ± 35.81
128.2 ± 30.16
Male
104.41 ±  27.69
121.59 ± 31.38
126.63 ± 32.55
129.28  ±  33.62
128.38 ± 33.81
125.89 ± 26.86
Female
93.52 ±  24.12
108.01 ± 25.09
123.37 ± 30.83
135.41  ±  34.13
139.22 ± 39.11
140.22 ± 43.72
LDL-C/HDL-C
Total
2.28 ± 0.87
2.85 ± 2.71
3.00 ± 0.94
3.15 ± 1.06
3.13 ± 3.04
3.0 ± 0.82
Male
2.70 ±  0.90
3.16 ± 0.95
3.24 ± 0.95
3.28  ±  1.13
3.17 ± 1.03
3.04 ± 0.87
Female
2.00 ±  0.74
2.44 ± 0.70
2.70 ± 0.84
2.94  ±  0.91
3.04 ± 0.94
2.82 ± 0.53
TC/HDL-C
Total
3.72 ± 1.08
4.45 ± 1.19
4.62 ± 1.20
4.84 ± 1.77
4.76 ± 1.24
4.64 ± 1.11
Male
4.26 ± 1.12
4.87 ± 1.22
4.95 ± 1.22
5.06  ±  2.06
4.81 ± 1.29
4.68 ± 1.19
Female
3.35 ±  0.88
3.89 ± 0.88
4.21 ± 1.02
4.48  ±  1.08
4.65 ± 1.12
4.44 ± 0.60
VLDL (mg/dL)
Total
17.94 ± 8.52
23.21 ± 14.31
24.571 ± 13.22
26.31 ± 13.16
25.74 ± 11.67
25.65 ± 12.05
Male
21.21 ± 10.17
26.21 ± 16.42
26.64 ± 15.34
27.78  ±  14.62
24.86 ± 11.21
24.93 ± 12.32
Female
15.72 ±  6.30
19.19 ± 9.53
22.06 ± 9.50
23.97  ±  10.05
26.84 ± 12.59
29.44 ± 10.29
TL (mg/dL)
Total
596.42 ± 63.56
639.4 ± 93.55
659.33 ± 86.84
676.40 ± 85.69
672.44 ± 85.32
670.39 ± 82.16
Male
612.33 ± 72.96
658.04 ± 105.79
666.82 ± 99.99
677.72 ± 92.57
662.75 ± 82.91
661.65 ± 79.75
Female
585.68 ±  53.84
614.5 ± 66.55
650.26 ± 66.62
674.30  ±  73.77
694.23 ± 87.09
716.00 ± 83.97
Blood sugar (mg/dL)
Total
76.93 ± 11.06
82.80 ± 15.86
88.816 ± 23.10
93.49 ± 30.84
94.55 ± 36.14
89.39 ± 16.43
Male
79.23 ± 11.02
85.16 ± 17.77
87.00 ± 17.68
95.61 ± 33.78
92.48 ± 26.06
90.85 ± 17.15
Female
75.37 ± 10.81
79.64 ± 12.20
87.00 ± 17.68
90.12 ± 25.27
99.21 ± 52.04
81.77 ± 9.29
SBP (mm/Hg)
Total
120.5 ± 14.72
127.14 ± 16.49
133.28 ± 18.13
137.85 ± 19.06
139.53 ± 36.14
138.25 ± 16.36
Male
128.23 ± 15.42
129.95 ± 15.85
134.44 ± 18.36
137.59 ± 18.35
139.76 ± 20.43
137.31 ± 15.28
Female
115.28 ± 11.62
123.37 ± 16.60
131.87 ± 17.77
138.27  ±  20.20
139.01 ± 20.91
143.11 ± 21.61
DBP (mm/Hg)
Total
77.40 ± 9.04
81.70 ± 9.90
84.30 ± 9.92
86.25 ± 11.07
85.62 ± 11.66
83.28 ± 8.75
Male
80.77 ± 8.46
83.02 ± 10.02
84.90 ± 9.83
86.31 ± 11.88
85.98 ± 12.13
83.06 ± 8.95
Female
75.12 ± 8.71
79.94 ± 9.47
83.58 ± 9.99
86.15 ± 9.68
84.80 ± 10.54
84.44 ± 7.98
BMI (kg/m2)
Total
24.78 ± 42.60
24.40 ± 5.00
27.52 ± 44.00
30.98 ± 131.38
25.42 ± 6.32
36.99 ± 94.84
Male
29.48 ± 66.63
24.33 ± 4.64
28.94 ± 59.24
25.23 ± 4.46
24.81 ± 4.20
39.40 ± 103.51
Female
21.60 ± 4.55
24.50 ± 5.46
25.82 ± 5.70
40.12 ± 211.5
26.79 ± 9.39
24.39 ± 4.70
TC: Total Cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; VLDL: Very Low Density Lipoprotein; TL: Total Lipid; SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure; BMI: Body Mass Index.
Data are expressed as mean ± SD.Table 5
Decade-wise percentile values of lipid profile, sugar, blood pressure, and BMI in Gujarati population.
Age in years
n
5th percentile
25th percentile
50th percentile
75th percentile
95th percentile
97th percentile
TC (mg/dL)
20–29
796
118
140.25
157
179.75
216
228.09
30–39
653
128
157.5
178
201
242.3
254.38
40–49
844
138
169
190
213
256.5
276.3
50–59
627
140
175
200
226
270
278
60–69
289
132.5
174
198
228.5
274
288.5
>70
56
127.85
173.5
202.5
220.25
254.3
275.43
TG (mg/dL)
20–29
796
47.85
63
77
102.75
178.15
202.09
30–39
653
52
72
98
141
230.3
278
40–49
844
62
83
106
142.75
231.75
264.3
50–59
627
63.4
88
115
153
271
292.8
60–69
289
62.5
89
112
154
241.5
274.5
>70
56
59
74.75
116.5
172.75
240.1
284.66
HDL-C (mg/dL)
20–29
796
30
38
44
52
65
67.09
30–39
653
29
36
42
47
58
60
40–49
844
31
37
42
49
61
63
50–59
627
30
38
42
49
61
63
60–69
289
30
37
42
49.5
60
63.3
>70
56
30.85
36.25
41.5
51.25
64.15
66.74
LDL-C (mg/dL)
20–29
796
60
81
93
113
146
158
30–39
653
71
94
114
133
169
178.38
40–49
844
77.25
104
123
143
179
185
50–59
627
77
109
131
153
185.6
200
60–69
289
72.5
107.5
131
155
195
203
>70
56
80.25
111
127
146.75
177.35
196.6
LDL-C/HDL-C
20–29
796
1.184
1.645
2.109
2.747
3.979
4.311
30–39
653
1.573
2.185
2.717
3.414
4.498
4.792
40–49
844
1.626
2.327
2.89
3.603
4.63
4.976
50–59
627
1.719
2.476
3.045
3.711
4.871
5.249
60–69
289
1.707
2.316
3.047
3.882
4.956
5.037
>70
56
1.692
2.399
2.975
3.429
4.686
4.913
TC/HDL-C
20–29
796
2.359
2.924
3.474
4.31
5.74
6.195
30–39
653
2.842
3.562
4.315
5.164
6.78
7.395
40–49
844
2.935
3.729
4.477
5.353
6.61
7.276
50–59
627
3.116
3.914
4.666
5.468
7
7.302
60–69
289
3.008
3.805
4.738
5.602
6.88
7.278
>70
56
2.974
3.868
4.361
5.373
6.91
7.52
VLDL (mg/dL)
20–29
796
9.85
13
15
20.75
36
40.09
30–39
653
10
14.5
20
28
46
55.76
40–49
844
12
17
21
28.75
46
53
50–59
627
13
18
23
31
54.6
58.16
60–69
289
12.5
18
22
31
48
55.3
>70
56
12
15
23.5
34.75
48.05
57.19
TL (mg/dL)
20–29
796
520
555
585
623
722
763.09
30–39
653
533
579
623
677
791.9
849.9
40–49
844
560
605.25
646
691
799.75
848.3
50–59
627
563.4
618
665
714
846.6
868.8
60–69
289
555.5
614
662
714
839
895
>70
56
544.55
598.75
677.5
729.75
831.65
859.45
Blood sugar (mg/dL)
20–29
796
60
70
77
84
95
98.09
30–39
652
64
74
81
89
102
112
40–49
844
67
78
85
94
116
137.95
50–59
627
66
79
88
98
134.2
178.96
60–69
289
65
78
89
99.5
146
155.9
>70
56
69.7
79
86.5
94
130.65
143.77
SBP (mm/Hg)
20–29
796
100
110
120
130
148
152
30–39
653
104
116
126
136
154
164
40–49
844
110
120
130
142
169.75
176
50–59
627
110
126
138
150
170
180
60–69
289
110
126
140
150
179
182.6
>70
56
109.1
128
140
150
164.7
180
DBP (mm/Hg)
20–29
796
68
70
80
80
90
96
30–39
653
70
76
80
90
100
100
40–49
844
70
80
84
90
100
102
50–59
627
70
80
86
90
100
100.32
60–69
289
70
80
84
90
100
105.8
>70
56
67.4
80
82
90
100
100
BMI (kg/m2)
20–29
796
15.93
18.42
21.35
24.82
30.43
31.96
30–39
653
17.45
21.35
23.93
26.65
32.11
33.92
40–49
844
17.88
22.37
25
28.14
33.69
35.3
50–59
627
19.22
22.78
25.51
28.22
33.33
34.66
60–69
289
18.45
22.28
25.06
27.51
32.34
34.25
>70
56
17.86
21.11
23.44
26.75
33.67
35.54
TC: Total Cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; VLDL: Very Low Density Lipoprotein; TL: Total Lipid; SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure; BMI: Body Mass Index. Data are expressed as the 5th to 97th percentile of median.Comparative examination of reference values established for various communities based on the population mean has been presented in Table6. We have observed that the TC of Gujarati population had the third highest (185.33
±
39.245 mg/dL) mean value in comparison to other Indian populations, whereas LDL-C had the third highest (118.5
±
33.46) mean value amongst all including Venezuelan and Nepali populations. The level of good cholesterol, HDL-C, was lowest (43.70
±
9.870) in Gujarati population.Table 6
Comparison between mean lipid values of different studies.
N
TC (mg/dL)
TG (mg/dL)
HDL-C (mg/dL)
LDL-C (mg/dL)
LDL/HDL
TC/HDL
VLDL (mg/dL)
Our study
3265
185.33 ± 39.245
115.6 ± 33.460
43.70 ± 9.870
118.50 ± 33.460
2.843 ± 1.028
4.429 ± 1.405
23.12 ± 12.70
Rajasthan
1527
168.13 ± 31.40
113 ± 47.44
45.10 ± 10.75
100.50 ± 27.71
—
—
—
Andhra Pradesh
1922
175.3 ± 34.6
132 ± 60.9
47.2 ± 10.4
101.1 ± 3.0
2.4 ± 1
4.15 ± 1.13
—
Bengal
1396
189.7 ± 33.3
132 ± 42.2
52.9 ± 10.1
115.6 ± 29.8
—
—
21.1 ± 6.5
Maharashtra
751
198 ± 37.16
119 ± 53.27
47 ± 11.13
121 ± 29.39
—
4.4 ± 1.13
—
Venezuela
434
191.96 ± 46
130.50 ± 102.53
44.27 ± 12.12
122.10 ± 38.40
—
—
26.10 ± 20.50
Nepal
454
184.0 ± 50.7
147.4 ± 88.7
45.0 ± 11.7
111.9 ± 42.0
—
—
—
TC: Total Cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; VLDL: Very Low Density Lipoprotein. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.


## 4. Discussion

The need for establishment of different reference intervals of lipids, sugar, blood pressure, and obesity in various community could be justified by the fact that these risk factors are subjected to racial and geographic variations with life style changes, demographic shifts, epidemiological transition, and urbanization playing a prime role. Moreover, Indians possess some of the unique characteristics such as higher predisposition to the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus, excess visceral fat and centripetal obesity, and smaller body size, which needs to be considered before screening the patients with any guidelines formerly standardized on western population [21]. Along with the “genetically deformed life style,” other modifiable risk factors of CVD such as dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and obesity are increasing in Gujarati population [22, 23]. A physically inactive life style and diet rich in oil and sugar have made Gujarat the second largest contributor of Indian diabetic population. This ethnic group is highly prone to develop and suffer from premature vascular ageing as their heart age is 6.7 years higher than their chronological age with dyslipidemia, hypertension, increased waist circumference, and diabetes as the involved factors [17]. Hence, it is of utmost importance to standardize the reference range of CVD contributing risk factor in Gujaratis. The first attempt to establish normal percentile values of serum lipid levels in healthy, vegetarian Gujarati population was done by Jhala et al. in 1998 [18]. The study showed natural ageing and gender specific disturbance in lipid profile. The author had reappraised the lipid values of the same community in 2009 [24] and compared the data with other populations from different states of India showing variation in lipid profile of Gujaratis as compared to others. In spite of the significant contribution of both studies in lipid reference range establishment, the findings lacked percentile values specific to various age groups and gender. Moreover, none of the studies has established reference range for blood glucose, blood pressure, and BMI in healthy, adult Gujarati population.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first ever large study providing representative age and gender specific percentile values for serum lipids, glucose, blood pressure, and BMI in healthy Gujarati Indians. Contrary to earlier reports where no substantial sex specific difference was noted in the lipid profile [11, 25], we had obtained significant difference between the risk profiles of males and females of the study population. The females were having superior CVD risk factor profile due to the estrogenic protective effect, which was found to be lost in the 5th to the 6th decade of life.Natural ageing induced elevation in CVD risk factors was observed in the study population; however, surprisingly, the mean value of HDL was found to increase steadily after the 3rd decade with the increasing age in both genders which is in accordance with other studies (Andhra Pradesh). A significant finding reflected from decade-wise analysis is the loss of premenopausal protection in females in the 5th to 6th decade of life as the mean values of serum Total Cholesterol, LDL-C, SBP, and BMI were higher in females of 50–59 age group as compared to their male counterpart of the same age group [11, 12]. Several epidemiological studies have shown the interplay between multiple risk factors of CVD such as dyslipidemia, diabetes, BMI, and hypertension [26, 27]. In concordance with our study, the coexistence of these risk factors in Gujarati population has been reported by others also [28]. One of the most striking outcomes of the study is the relatively low level of HDL-C in Gujaratis compared to Rajasthani, Andhra Pradesh, Bengali, Maharashtrian, Venezuelan, and Nepalese population [10, 12, 29–32]. All of these studies were undertaken on apparently healthy population similar to ours. Prajapati et al. had shown great degree of association between higher carotid intima thickness and low HDL-C [33] levels in Gujarati children, making HDL-C one of the strongest predictors of CAD in the studied community. We have observed the alarmingly high proportion of population being unaware of the CVD risk factors prevalence.Representative percentile reference data of modifiable risk factors of CVD are highly required for the framing of appropriate diagnostic and preventive policies. The values provided in the current study could be effectively used as reference values that are specific for Gujarati population. The strengths of the study are the well-defined percentile values of modifiable risk factors, larger population size, standard laboratory techniques, and participants from different regions of Gujarat state. However, the study also possesses some limitations such as lack of information regarding the history of genetics, diet, and stress, daily consumption of alcohol and tobacco of the study population.


## 5. Conclusion

The outcome of the current study will contribute significantly to standardization of the reference values of various lipids, glucose, blood pressure, and BMI which are of clinical importance and will help in the designing of better diagnostic strategies.



---

*Source: 394798-2015-12-28.xml*