# Surfactant Sensitized Calix[4]arenes Fluorescence Quenching Method for Speciation of Cr(VI)/Cr(III) in Water Samples

Authors: Wenjun Wang; Xiashi Zhu; Chaoguo Yan
Journal: ISRN Spectroscopy
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The surfactant sensitized spectrofluorimetry for speciation of chromium (Cr(VI)/Cr(III)) was developed. The analytical procedure was that the fluorescence intensity of l4,10,16,22-tetramethoxyl resorcinarene carboxylic acid derivatives (TRCA) could be selectively quenched by Cr(VI) and the fluorescence quenching value (ΔF=FTRCA-FCr(VI)-TRCA) was increased in cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). The main influence factors on the fluorescence quenching (ΔF) were investigated in detail. Under the optimal conditions, the linear range of calibration curve for the determination of Cr(VI) was 0.10~5.00 μg/mL, and the detection limit was 0.024 μg/mL with RSD=2.10% (c=1.0 μg/mL, n=3). The concentration of Cr(III) was calculated by subtracting Cr(VI) from the total chromium determined after oxidizing Cr(III) to Cr(VI). The preliminary sensitized mechanism was discussed with the inclusion constant (K) of TRCA-Cr(VI), the fluorescence quantum yield of TRCA, and IR spectra characterization. The method has been applied to the speciation analysis of Cr(VI)/Cr(III) in water samples.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Chromium (Cr) is one of the most commonly present heavy metal pollutants in industrial wastewater. Chromium compounds mainly exist in two oxidation states(Cr(III) and Cr(VI)) in the environment. The reduced form of chromium Cr(III) is less toxic and is an essential nutrient required for normal glucose metabolism at low concentrations. Cr(VI) is much more mobile, toxic, and carcinogenic than Cr(III), which is widely used in electroplating, leather tanning, metal finishing, photography and dye and textile industries. The effluents from these industries often contain elevated levels of Cr(VI). Therefore, there is a great risk of chromium leaching from these effluents into the environment and our food chain. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommend that the concentration of Cr(VI) in drinking water should be less than 0.05 mg L−1 and 0.1 mg L−1, respectively [1–5]. Hence, the development of accurate and reliable methods for the speciation of Cr(III)/Cr(VI) in water samples is of particular significance to obtain comprehensive information about their toxicity and human health relevance.A variety of analytical methods such as ultraviolet visible absorption spectrometry (UV-Vis) [6], electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS) [7], flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) [8–11], high performance liquid phase chromatography (HPLC) [12, 13], inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [14, 15], and gas chromatography (GC) [16] were developed for the determination of Cr(III)/Cr(VI). However, most of these methods usually needed multiple separation and preconcentration steps due to their poor sensitivity and selectivity for the extremely low concentration of chromium species in complicated matrix samples. So, a simple, rapid, and efficient sample preparation method is a need for the speciation analysis of Cr(III)/Cr(VI) in water samples.Surfactants are used in spectroscopic analysis due to their sensitization, solubilization, stabilization, growth, and contrast increasing characteristics. In our previous publications, the sensitizing effects of surfactant on the determination of metal ions by UV-Vis spectrophotometry and spectrofluorimetry were developed [17–19]. But CTAB sensitized fluorescence quenching method of the derivatives of calix[4]arene for the analysis Cr(VI)/Cr(III) seems to be lacking.As the same as crown ethers and cyclodextrins, calixarene is one of the members of supramolecular host compounds: they are often used as scaffolds onto which these functional groups can be attached. They can be readily functionalized through the phenolic groups or directly on the aromatic ring, and this has resulted in the design and synthesis of a variety of derivatives for a wide range of functions [20]. In recent years, calixarenes have an extensive application in analytical chemistry for their particular construction [21–24]. The special modified functional group (carboxyl) could enhance water solubility of the calixarene, which showed highly selective recognition function  and has been applied in biological molecules analysis [25]. The recognition of Cr based on host-guest chemistry of the derivatives of calix[4]arene has been reported [26, 27]. In this paper, a new type of calixarene carboxylic acid derivative was synthesized (Figure 1). The interaction of Cr(VI) and 4,10,16,22-tetramethoxyl resorcinarene carboxylic acid derivatives (TRCA) was investigated with fluorescence spectroscopy. The fluorescence quenching method of TRCA for the analysis Cr(VI)/Cr(III) has been established. There are many advantages for this method, such as quick, simple, efficient, and high selectivity, so it has a high application prospect.Figure 1
Structure of TRCA.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Apparatus and Chemicals

The fluorescence analysis was carried out by F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Japan); UV2550 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Japan) and Bruker Tensor 27 infrared spectrometer (Bruker Company, Germany) were used to explore the mechanism of inclusion formation; A pHS-25 type pH meter (Shanghai Precision kore magnetic Factory) was used to control the pH value of sample solutions.The preparation of calixarene carboxylic acid is based on the synthetic route depicted in Figure2. 4,10,16,22-Tetramethoxyl[4]resorcinarene 2 was prepared by the previously described methods [28–30], whereas the tetramethoxyl[4]resorcinarene derivatives 3-4 were first synthesized in this work. The structure information and purities of these compounds were confirmed by TLC, FT-IR, and NMR. A stock solution of TRCA (8.5×10-5mol/L) was prepared in ethanol.Figure 2
The synthetic routing of calixarene carboxylic acid.The stock solution of Cr(VI) (1.00 mg mL−1) was prepared by dissolving 0.2829 g  K2Cr2O7 (Shanghai Reagent Factory, Shanghai, China) in double distilled water and diluting to 100 mL. A 1.00 mg mL−1 stock solution of Cr(III) was prepared by dissolving 0.1000 g metallic chromium powder (Tokyo, Japan 5N) in appropriate concentrated hydrochloric acid and diluting to 100 mL with double distilled water. Standard solutions of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) were prepared by appropriate dilution of the stock solutions, respectively.5.0% hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), 5.0% Triton X-100, 5.0% dodecyl sulfate sodium (SDS), 1.0% C14mimBr and CH3COOH-CH3COONa, NH3·H2O-NH4Cl buffer solutions were employed.All chemicals were of analytical grade.


### 2.2. Procedure

#### 2.2.1. Measuring of Fluorescence Intensity

A quantitative reference substance solution of Cr(VI), 1.0 mL NH3·H2O-NH4Cl buffer solution (pH=9.0), 2.0 mL TRCA (8.47×10-5mol/L), and 0.5 mL 5.0% CTAB were added in a 5.0 mL centrifuge tube. The mixed solution was diluted to final volume with distilled water and was shaken thoroughly. The obtained solution was thermostated at 30.0±1°C for 30 min, and the fluorescence intensity of the solution (FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB) was measured at excitation wavelength 280 nm and emission wavelength from 250 to 400 nm in a 1.0 cm quartz cell by a F-4500 fluorospectrophotometer, and the fluorescence intensity of the blank solution (FTRCA-CTAB) was measured at the same time. Then the fluorescence quenching value ΔF  (ΔF=FTRCA-CTAB-FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB) was obtained. The excitation and emission bandwidths were both set to 5 nm. The scan rate is 1200 nm/min.


#### 2.2.2. The Benesi-Hildebrand Method

In this experiment, the Benesi-Hildebrand method [31] (double reciprocal plot) was used for calculating the inclusion constant (K) of TRCA-Cr(VI) assuming a 1 : 1 inclusion model. And the expression was given by (1), where [TRCA]0 was the total concentration of TRCA, ΔF was the fluorescence quenching value, and α was constant. Thus, the inclusion constant (K) of the 1 : 1 complex, which had been calculated by dividing the intercept by the slope of the double reciprocal plot:(1)1ΔF=1(K·α·[TRCA]0)·1[Cr(VI)]+1(α·[TRCA]0).


#### 2.2.3. Determination of Relative Fluorescence Quantum Yield [32, 33]

Fluorescence quantum yields of TRCA and TRCA-CTAB were measured using 0.1 mg/mL L-tryptophan as reference material. Under the same apparatus conditions, according to (2), the quantum yields of the analyte were calculated. Briefly, Ys and Yu are the corresponding standard and measurement-needed fluorescence quantum yield, and Fs and Fu the integral areas of two calibration fluorescence emission curves, As and Au the absorbance (λabsorbance=λemission) of the standard and measurement-needed materials, and Ys=0.14 (25°C) is known:(2)Yu=Ys×FuFs×AsAu.


#### 2.2.4. Preparation of Water Sample

The lake water from the slender west lake (Yangzhou, China) was collected in polyethylene bottles. All water samples were filtered through 0.45 µm pore size membrane filters immediately and then stored at 4.0°C in polyethylene volumetric flasks.The certified reference water samples for the total chromium (GBW(E) 080462, Shanghai Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology, Shanghai, China) and the Cr(VI) (GSBZ50027-94, Institute for Environmental Reference Materials of Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing, China) were diluted appropriately with double distilled water.


## 2.1. Apparatus and Chemicals

The fluorescence analysis was carried out by F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Japan); UV2550 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Japan) and Bruker Tensor 27 infrared spectrometer (Bruker Company, Germany) were used to explore the mechanism of inclusion formation; A pHS-25 type pH meter (Shanghai Precision kore magnetic Factory) was used to control the pH value of sample solutions.The preparation of calixarene carboxylic acid is based on the synthetic route depicted in Figure2. 4,10,16,22-Tetramethoxyl[4]resorcinarene 2 was prepared by the previously described methods [28–30], whereas the tetramethoxyl[4]resorcinarene derivatives 3-4 were first synthesized in this work. The structure information and purities of these compounds were confirmed by TLC, FT-IR, and NMR. A stock solution of TRCA (8.5×10-5mol/L) was prepared in ethanol.Figure 2
The synthetic routing of calixarene carboxylic acid.The stock solution of Cr(VI) (1.00 mg mL−1) was prepared by dissolving 0.2829 g  K2Cr2O7 (Shanghai Reagent Factory, Shanghai, China) in double distilled water and diluting to 100 mL. A 1.00 mg mL−1 stock solution of Cr(III) was prepared by dissolving 0.1000 g metallic chromium powder (Tokyo, Japan 5N) in appropriate concentrated hydrochloric acid and diluting to 100 mL with double distilled water. Standard solutions of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) were prepared by appropriate dilution of the stock solutions, respectively.5.0% hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), 5.0% Triton X-100, 5.0% dodecyl sulfate sodium (SDS), 1.0% C14mimBr and CH3COOH-CH3COONa, NH3·H2O-NH4Cl buffer solutions were employed.All chemicals were of analytical grade.


## 2.2. Procedure

### 2.2.1. Measuring of Fluorescence Intensity

A quantitative reference substance solution of Cr(VI), 1.0 mL NH3·H2O-NH4Cl buffer solution (pH=9.0), 2.0 mL TRCA (8.47×10-5mol/L), and 0.5 mL 5.0% CTAB were added in a 5.0 mL centrifuge tube. The mixed solution was diluted to final volume with distilled water and was shaken thoroughly. The obtained solution was thermostated at 30.0±1°C for 30 min, and the fluorescence intensity of the solution (FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB) was measured at excitation wavelength 280 nm and emission wavelength from 250 to 400 nm in a 1.0 cm quartz cell by a F-4500 fluorospectrophotometer, and the fluorescence intensity of the blank solution (FTRCA-CTAB) was measured at the same time. Then the fluorescence quenching value ΔF  (ΔF=FTRCA-CTAB-FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB) was obtained. The excitation and emission bandwidths were both set to 5 nm. The scan rate is 1200 nm/min.


### 2.2.2. The Benesi-Hildebrand Method

In this experiment, the Benesi-Hildebrand method [31] (double reciprocal plot) was used for calculating the inclusion constant (K) of TRCA-Cr(VI) assuming a 1 : 1 inclusion model. And the expression was given by (1), where [TRCA]0 was the total concentration of TRCA, ΔF was the fluorescence quenching value, and α was constant. Thus, the inclusion constant (K) of the 1 : 1 complex, which had been calculated by dividing the intercept by the slope of the double reciprocal plot:(1)1ΔF=1(K·α·[TRCA]0)·1[Cr(VI)]+1(α·[TRCA]0).


### 2.2.3. Determination of Relative Fluorescence Quantum Yield [32, 33]

Fluorescence quantum yields of TRCA and TRCA-CTAB were measured using 0.1 mg/mL L-tryptophan as reference material. Under the same apparatus conditions, according to (2), the quantum yields of the analyte were calculated. Briefly, Ys and Yu are the corresponding standard and measurement-needed fluorescence quantum yield, and Fs and Fu the integral areas of two calibration fluorescence emission curves, As and Au the absorbance (λabsorbance=λemission) of the standard and measurement-needed materials, and Ys=0.14 (25°C) is known:(2)Yu=Ys×FuFs×AsAu.


### 2.2.4. Preparation of Water Sample

The lake water from the slender west lake (Yangzhou, China) was collected in polyethylene bottles. All water samples were filtered through 0.45 µm pore size membrane filters immediately and then stored at 4.0°C in polyethylene volumetric flasks.The certified reference water samples for the total chromium (GBW(E) 080462, Shanghai Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology, Shanghai, China) and the Cr(VI) (GSBZ50027-94, Institute for Environmental Reference Materials of Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing, China) were diluted appropriately with double distilled water.


## 2.2.1. Measuring of Fluorescence Intensity

A quantitative reference substance solution of Cr(VI), 1.0 mL NH3·H2O-NH4Cl buffer solution (pH=9.0), 2.0 mL TRCA (8.47×10-5mol/L), and 0.5 mL 5.0% CTAB were added in a 5.0 mL centrifuge tube. The mixed solution was diluted to final volume with distilled water and was shaken thoroughly. The obtained solution was thermostated at 30.0±1°C for 30 min, and the fluorescence intensity of the solution (FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB) was measured at excitation wavelength 280 nm and emission wavelength from 250 to 400 nm in a 1.0 cm quartz cell by a F-4500 fluorospectrophotometer, and the fluorescence intensity of the blank solution (FTRCA-CTAB) was measured at the same time. Then the fluorescence quenching value ΔF  (ΔF=FTRCA-CTAB-FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB) was obtained. The excitation and emission bandwidths were both set to 5 nm. The scan rate is 1200 nm/min.


## 2.2.2. The Benesi-Hildebrand Method

In this experiment, the Benesi-Hildebrand method [31] (double reciprocal plot) was used for calculating the inclusion constant (K) of TRCA-Cr(VI) assuming a 1 : 1 inclusion model. And the expression was given by (1), where [TRCA]0 was the total concentration of TRCA, ΔF was the fluorescence quenching value, and α was constant. Thus, the inclusion constant (K) of the 1 : 1 complex, which had been calculated by dividing the intercept by the slope of the double reciprocal plot:(1)1ΔF=1(K·α·[TRCA]0)·1[Cr(VI)]+1(α·[TRCA]0).


## 2.2.3. Determination of Relative Fluorescence Quantum Yield [32, 33]

Fluorescence quantum yields of TRCA and TRCA-CTAB were measured using 0.1 mg/mL L-tryptophan as reference material. Under the same apparatus conditions, according to (2), the quantum yields of the analyte were calculated. Briefly, Ys and Yu are the corresponding standard and measurement-needed fluorescence quantum yield, and Fs and Fu the integral areas of two calibration fluorescence emission curves, As and Au the absorbance (λabsorbance=λemission) of the standard and measurement-needed materials, and Ys=0.14 (25°C) is known:(2)Yu=Ys×FuFs×AsAu.


## 2.2.4. Preparation of Water Sample

The lake water from the slender west lake (Yangzhou, China) was collected in polyethylene bottles. All water samples were filtered through 0.45 µm pore size membrane filters immediately and then stored at 4.0°C in polyethylene volumetric flasks.The certified reference water samples for the total chromium (GBW(E) 080462, Shanghai Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology, Shanghai, China) and the Cr(VI) (GSBZ50027-94, Institute for Environmental Reference Materials of Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing, China) were diluted appropriately with double distilled water.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Choice of Media

The fluorescence quenching values (ΔF) of Cr(VI)-TRCA (ΔF=FTRCA-FCr(VI)-TRCA) in different medium were investigated (Table 1). As could be seen in Table 1, the order of ΔF was
(3)ΔF5.0%CTAB>ΔF5.0%SDS>ΔF1%C14mimBr>ΔFH2O>ΔF5.0%TritonX-110.Table 1
Effect of different mediums on fluorescence intensity.
Medium
Δ
F
H2O
50.9
5. 0% Triton X-100
15.0
5.0% SDS
135.3
5.0% CTAB
150.4
1%C14mimBr
92.6The fluorescence emission spectra of TRCA (present of or absent of Cr(VI)) in CTAB and H2O media were shown in Figure 3. It could be seen that the fluorescence intensity of TRCA (FTRCA) was enhanced in presence of CTAB (FTRCA-CTAB) (curve 3, curve 1), and the ΔF2=FTRCA-CTAB-FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB (curve 1/curve 2) was larger than that ΔF1=FTRCA-FCr(VI)-TRCA (curve 3/curve 4) with the same concentration of Cr(VI): there was the sensitizing effect in CTAB. Hence, 5.0% of CTAB medium was chosen for this paper.Figure 3
Fluorescence spectra (1: TRCA, 2: TRCA-Cr(VI), 3: TRCA-Cr(III)).


### 3.2. Fluorescence Spectra

The fluorescence emission spectra of TRCA, TRCA-Cr(VI), and TRCA-Cr(III) were shown in Figure4. It could be seen that (1) the fluorescence intensity of TRCA (FTRCA) was diminished when Cr(VI) interacted with TRCA (curve 3); (2) the FTRCA remained unchanging when Cr(III) mixed with TRCA (curve 2);  (3) the FTRCA was gradually decreased with an increase of Cr(VI) concentration (auxiliary Figure 4, curve 1–7), and curve 7 was the fluorescence spectrum of TRCA-Cr(VI)  when Cr(VI) was excessive, which indicated that inclusion complex of TRCA-Cr(VI) was a weak fluorescent complex.Figure 4
Fluorescence  spectra.(1) TRCA (3.4×10-5mol/L) +CTAB; (2) Cr(VI) (1.00 μg/mL) +TRC (3.4×10-5mol/L) +CTAB; (3) TRCA (3.4×10-5mol/L) +H2O; (4) Cr(VI) (1.00 μg/mL) +TRCA (3.4×10-5mol/L) +H2O.


### 3.3. Optimization of Conditions

#### 3.3.1. Effect of pH

The influence of pH on the fluorescence quenching value (ΔF) was investigated (Figure 5). As could be seen in Figure 5, ΔF was gradually enhanced and reached the maximum (pH=9.0) then remained relatively constant after pH=9.Figure 5
Effect of pH on fluorescence intensity.CCr(VI): 1.00 μg/mL CTRCA: 3.4×10-5mol/L.In order to discuss the influence of pH on ΔF, the change of FTRCA-CTAB and FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB with pH was investigated (auxiliary Figure 5). As could be stated in auxiliary Figure 5(1) both FTRCA-CTAB and FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB were increased with pH value (pH=5.0-9.0), but FTRCA-CTAB had a larger changing tendency (ΔF↑= FTRCA-CTAB↑↑-FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB↑); (2) FTRCA-CTAB and FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB had the same changing tendency, namely, ΔF remained unchanging (pH=9.0-11.0). Above all, ΔFpH9.0-11.0>ΔFpH5.0-9.0. Thus, 1.0 mL NH3·H2O-NH4Cl buffer solution of pH=10.0 was chosen for the determination.


#### 3.3.2. Effect of TRCA Amount

The effect of the amount of TRCA on the ΔF was tested. The results were shown in Figure 6. The fluorescence quenching value (ΔF) was increased and reached a maximum value at a TRCA (8.5×10-5mol/L) amount of 2.0 mL and then decreased with the concentration of TRCA. Auxiliary Figure 6 shows the influence of TRCA amount on FTRCA-CTAB. It was clear that FTRCA-CTABor ΔF gradually decreased with the increase of TRCA amount due to the self-quenching of TRCA at higher concentrations. Thus, 2.0 mL TRCA (8.5×10-5mol /L) was chosen for the assay.Figure 6
Effect of the amount of TRCA on fluorescence intensity.CCr(VI): 1.00 μg/mL CTRCA: 8.5×10-5mol/L.


#### 3.3.3. Effect of CTAB Amount

The effect of the amount of 5.0% CTAB on the ΔF was investigated. As was shown in Figure 7, ΔF reached a maximum with 0.4 mL of 5.0% CTAB added and was kept constant in the CTAB volume range of 0.4–1.0 mL. In this work, 0.5 mL 5.0% of CTAB was chosen for the following experiments.Figure 7
Effect of the amount of CTAB on fluorescence intensity.CCr(VI): 1.00 μg/mL CTRCA: 3.4×10-5mol/L.


#### 3.3.4. Effect of Temperature and Time

The effects of temperature (10–50°C) and time (0–50 min) onΔF were tested. It was found that ΔF was steady ranging from 20 to 40°C and 25 to 50 min. Therefore, the suitable temperature of 30±1°C and preparation time of 30 min were recommended for the work.


### 3.4. Effect of Foreign Substances

The effects of the different foreign substrates were discussed on the determination of the 1.00μg/mL of Cr(VI). The results were shown in Table 2. It was observed that most of the common metal ions and dye molecules did not influence the determination of Cr(VI).Table 2
Effect of interfering substances on fluorescence.
Foreign ions
Foreign/Cr(VI) (w/w)
Na+
500.00
K+
500.00
N
H
4
+
300.00
Mg2+
200.00
Cu2+
10.00
Zn2+
10.00
Ca2+
10.00
Ni2+
10.00
Cr3+
3.00
Pb2+
2.00
Cd2+
2.00
Hg2+
1.00
Cl−
500.00
Br−
500.00
Ac−
300.00
CO
3
2
-
200.00
SO
4
2
-
200.00
NO
3
-
100.00


### 3.5. Effect of H2O2 Amount

The total chromium was determined after oxidizing Cr(III) to Cr(VI). The appropriate oxidant was (1) quantitatively oxidize Cr(III) to Cr(VI); (2) there was no quenching effect for the fluorescence intensity of TRCA. In this paper, 0.1% H2O2 was chosen as oxidant. So, the oxidation rate of Cr(III) and the effect of H2O2 on the fluorescence intensity of TRCA were investigated (Figure 8). As could be seen in Figure 8 that (1)  FTRCA was decreased when the amount of 0.1% H2O2 was 0.2 mL; (2) the oxidation ratio exceeded 95% and was almost constant when the amount of 0.1% H2O2, was more than 0.1 mL. So, 0.1 mL 0.1% of H2O2 was chosen for the oxidation of 1.00 μg/mL Cr(III).Figure 8
Effect of the amount of H2O2. (CCr(III): 1.00 μg/mL CTRCA: 3.4×10-5mol/L).


### 3.6. Analytical Performance

Under the optimum conditions, the linear regression equation wasΔF=15.39+288.68c (μg/mL) with a correlation coefficient of R=0.9966. A linear relationship was observed over the range of 0.10~5.00 μg/mL. The detection limit estimated (S/N = 3) was 0.024 μg/mL, RSD was 2.1% (n=3,c=1.00 μg/mL).


### 3.7. Sample Analysis

In order to verify the feasibility of the method, the proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in reference water samples (GSBZ50027-94 and GBW(E)080642) and real water samples (laboratory water samples). As could be seen in Tables3 and 4, the determined values were in good agreement with the certified values, and the relative recoveries in the range of 102.0%–103.0% were obtained by determination of spiked real samples.Table 3
Analysis of certified reference materials (mean ± S.D.,n=3).
Sample
Certified value (µg mL−1)
Found (µg mL−1)
Total Cr recovery (%)
Cr(VI)
Cr(III)
Total Cr
Cr(VI)
Cr(III)a
Total Cr
GSBZ50027-94
0.40
±
0.01
—
—
0.42
±
0.01
ND
0.42
±
0.01
105.0
GBW(E)080642
—
—
100.00
±
5.00
24.80
±
1.30
73.24
±
3.04
98.04
±
3.04
98.0
ND: not detected;athe concentration of Cr(III) was calculated by subtracting of Cr(VI ) from the total chromium.Table 4
Determination of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in real water samples (mean ± S.D.,n=3).
Sample
Added (µg mL−1)
Found (µg mL−1)
Recovery (%)
Cr(VI)
Cr(III)
Cr(VI)
Cr(III)a
Total Cr
Cr(VI)
Cr(III)
Total Cr
Tap water
0
0
ND
ND
ND
—
—
—
0.25
0.25
0
.
2
4
±
0
.
01
0
.
2
6
±
0
.
01
0
.
51
±
0.0
1
96.0
104.0
102.0
0.50
0.50
0
.
5
2
±
0
.
01
0
.
51
±
0
.
01
1
.
0
3
±
0
.
01
104.0
102.0
103.0
ND: Not detected;aThe concentration of Cr(III) was calculated by subtracting of Cr(VI ) from the total chromium.


### 3.8. Discussion of Mechanism

#### 3.8.1. The Interaction of TRCA and Cr(VI)

TRCA is an easy-to-select modification of both the upper and lower edges, with the benzene ring units composed of hydrophobic cavities, which have a truncated cone structure which could tie with ionic object or pack neutral molecules [28]. This special molecular structure could include guest molecule (Cr(VI)) which had matched polarity, size, shape, and property into their hydrophobic cavities to form inclusion complexes, which may affect the fluorescence intensity of TRCA.According to the Benesi-Hildebrand method, it was found that the double reciprocal plot of TRCA-Cr(VI) had good linear relationships (Figure9), which could support the formation of a 1 : 1 complex, and the inclusion constant K for Cr(VI) was 7.29×103L/mol. The larger the value of K, the more steady the inclusion complex. While, the same method was applied to investigate the interaction of TRCA and Cr(III), the results indicated that there was no interaction between them.Figure 9
Double reciprocal plot of Cr(VI) in TRCA. (CTRCA: 3.4×10-5mol/L).


#### 3.8.2. IR Spectra Characterization

From Figure10 (curve 1: TRCA, curve 2: TRCA-Cr(VI)), carbonyl peak (1728 cm−1) of TRCA disappeared and new peaks appeared at about 1683 cm−1, which proved that Cr(VI) was interacting with the carbonyl of TRCA. Therefore, the reasonable configuration of interaction of TRCA and Cr(VI) may be shown in Figure 11.Figure 10
The IR spectra (1: TRCA; 2: TRCA-Cr(VI)).Figure 11
The configuration of inclusion (TRCA-Cr(VI)).


#### 3.8.3. The Sensitizing Effect of CTAB

Generally speaking, it was demonstrated that the sensitizing effect of CTAB on spectrofluorimetry rested on two factors:(1) the solubilization capacity and (2) the microenvironment of medium [34]. In order to discuss the influence of the microenvironment on the fluorescence intensity of TRCA, the fluorescence quantum yields Yu in various media were determined, respectively (Table 5). Yu of TRCA in the presence of CTAB was approximately 2.0 times higher than that in the absence of CTAB. The fluorescence quantum yield was one of the mostly basic and significant parameters in all the characters of fluorescence substance [35], which represented the ability of translating absorption energy to fluorescence and was tightly related to chemical structure and microenvironment of the system [36]. The Yu value is higher, the ability of translating absorption energy to fluorescence is stronger. What is more, ΔF=FTRCA-FCr(VI)-TRCA, where ΔF must increase as the increasing of fluorescence quantum yield of TRCA. Therefore, the fluorescence intensity was higher in the CTAB micelle than that in H2O medium because the CTAB micelle could better accommodate the microenvironment. In other words, CTAB was able to decrease the self-fluorescence quenching of TRCA and the fluorescence quenching effort of the external quencher. So, CTAB had sensitizing effect on TRCA and the fluorescence quenching value (ΔF) of the Cr(VI)-TRCA system.Table 5
Y
u value of TRCA in different mediums.
Medium
Y
u
H2O
0.045
5% CTAB
0.089


## 3.1. Choice of Media

The fluorescence quenching values (ΔF) of Cr(VI)-TRCA (ΔF=FTRCA-FCr(VI)-TRCA) in different medium were investigated (Table 1). As could be seen in Table 1, the order of ΔF was
(3)ΔF5.0%CTAB>ΔF5.0%SDS>ΔF1%C14mimBr>ΔFH2O>ΔF5.0%TritonX-110.Table 1
Effect of different mediums on fluorescence intensity.
Medium
Δ
F
H2O
50.9
5. 0% Triton X-100
15.0
5.0% SDS
135.3
5.0% CTAB
150.4
1%C14mimBr
92.6The fluorescence emission spectra of TRCA (present of or absent of Cr(VI)) in CTAB and H2O media were shown in Figure 3. It could be seen that the fluorescence intensity of TRCA (FTRCA) was enhanced in presence of CTAB (FTRCA-CTAB) (curve 3, curve 1), and the ΔF2=FTRCA-CTAB-FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB (curve 1/curve 2) was larger than that ΔF1=FTRCA-FCr(VI)-TRCA (curve 3/curve 4) with the same concentration of Cr(VI): there was the sensitizing effect in CTAB. Hence, 5.0% of CTAB medium was chosen for this paper.Figure 3
Fluorescence spectra (1: TRCA, 2: TRCA-Cr(VI), 3: TRCA-Cr(III)).


## 3.2. Fluorescence Spectra

The fluorescence emission spectra of TRCA, TRCA-Cr(VI), and TRCA-Cr(III) were shown in Figure4. It could be seen that (1) the fluorescence intensity of TRCA (FTRCA) was diminished when Cr(VI) interacted with TRCA (curve 3); (2) the FTRCA remained unchanging when Cr(III) mixed with TRCA (curve 2);  (3) the FTRCA was gradually decreased with an increase of Cr(VI) concentration (auxiliary Figure 4, curve 1–7), and curve 7 was the fluorescence spectrum of TRCA-Cr(VI)  when Cr(VI) was excessive, which indicated that inclusion complex of TRCA-Cr(VI) was a weak fluorescent complex.Figure 4
Fluorescence  spectra.(1) TRCA (3.4×10-5mol/L) +CTAB; (2) Cr(VI) (1.00 μg/mL) +TRC (3.4×10-5mol/L) +CTAB; (3) TRCA (3.4×10-5mol/L) +H2O; (4) Cr(VI) (1.00 μg/mL) +TRCA (3.4×10-5mol/L) +H2O.


## 3.3. Optimization of Conditions

### 3.3.1. Effect of pH

The influence of pH on the fluorescence quenching value (ΔF) was investigated (Figure 5). As could be seen in Figure 5, ΔF was gradually enhanced and reached the maximum (pH=9.0) then remained relatively constant after pH=9.Figure 5
Effect of pH on fluorescence intensity.CCr(VI): 1.00 μg/mL CTRCA: 3.4×10-5mol/L.In order to discuss the influence of pH on ΔF, the change of FTRCA-CTAB and FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB with pH was investigated (auxiliary Figure 5). As could be stated in auxiliary Figure 5(1) both FTRCA-CTAB and FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB were increased with pH value (pH=5.0-9.0), but FTRCA-CTAB had a larger changing tendency (ΔF↑= FTRCA-CTAB↑↑-FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB↑); (2) FTRCA-CTAB and FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB had the same changing tendency, namely, ΔF remained unchanging (pH=9.0-11.0). Above all, ΔFpH9.0-11.0>ΔFpH5.0-9.0. Thus, 1.0 mL NH3·H2O-NH4Cl buffer solution of pH=10.0 was chosen for the determination.


### 3.3.2. Effect of TRCA Amount

The effect of the amount of TRCA on the ΔF was tested. The results were shown in Figure 6. The fluorescence quenching value (ΔF) was increased and reached a maximum value at a TRCA (8.5×10-5mol/L) amount of 2.0 mL and then decreased with the concentration of TRCA. Auxiliary Figure 6 shows the influence of TRCA amount on FTRCA-CTAB. It was clear that FTRCA-CTABor ΔF gradually decreased with the increase of TRCA amount due to the self-quenching of TRCA at higher concentrations. Thus, 2.0 mL TRCA (8.5×10-5mol /L) was chosen for the assay.Figure 6
Effect of the amount of TRCA on fluorescence intensity.CCr(VI): 1.00 μg/mL CTRCA: 8.5×10-5mol/L.


### 3.3.3. Effect of CTAB Amount

The effect of the amount of 5.0% CTAB on the ΔF was investigated. As was shown in Figure 7, ΔF reached a maximum with 0.4 mL of 5.0% CTAB added and was kept constant in the CTAB volume range of 0.4–1.0 mL. In this work, 0.5 mL 5.0% of CTAB was chosen for the following experiments.Figure 7
Effect of the amount of CTAB on fluorescence intensity.CCr(VI): 1.00 μg/mL CTRCA: 3.4×10-5mol/L.


### 3.3.4. Effect of Temperature and Time

The effects of temperature (10–50°C) and time (0–50 min) onΔF were tested. It was found that ΔF was steady ranging from 20 to 40°C and 25 to 50 min. Therefore, the suitable temperature of 30±1°C and preparation time of 30 min were recommended for the work.


## 3.3.1. Effect of pH

The influence of pH on the fluorescence quenching value (ΔF) was investigated (Figure 5). As could be seen in Figure 5, ΔF was gradually enhanced and reached the maximum (pH=9.0) then remained relatively constant after pH=9.Figure 5
Effect of pH on fluorescence intensity.CCr(VI): 1.00 μg/mL CTRCA: 3.4×10-5mol/L.In order to discuss the influence of pH on ΔF, the change of FTRCA-CTAB and FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB with pH was investigated (auxiliary Figure 5). As could be stated in auxiliary Figure 5(1) both FTRCA-CTAB and FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB were increased with pH value (pH=5.0-9.0), but FTRCA-CTAB had a larger changing tendency (ΔF↑= FTRCA-CTAB↑↑-FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB↑); (2) FTRCA-CTAB and FCr(VI)-TRCA-CTAB had the same changing tendency, namely, ΔF remained unchanging (pH=9.0-11.0). Above all, ΔFpH9.0-11.0>ΔFpH5.0-9.0. Thus, 1.0 mL NH3·H2O-NH4Cl buffer solution of pH=10.0 was chosen for the determination.


## 3.3.2. Effect of TRCA Amount

The effect of the amount of TRCA on the ΔF was tested. The results were shown in Figure 6. The fluorescence quenching value (ΔF) was increased and reached a maximum value at a TRCA (8.5×10-5mol/L) amount of 2.0 mL and then decreased with the concentration of TRCA. Auxiliary Figure 6 shows the influence of TRCA amount on FTRCA-CTAB. It was clear that FTRCA-CTABor ΔF gradually decreased with the increase of TRCA amount due to the self-quenching of TRCA at higher concentrations. Thus, 2.0 mL TRCA (8.5×10-5mol /L) was chosen for the assay.Figure 6
Effect of the amount of TRCA on fluorescence intensity.CCr(VI): 1.00 μg/mL CTRCA: 8.5×10-5mol/L.


## 3.3.3. Effect of CTAB Amount

The effect of the amount of 5.0% CTAB on the ΔF was investigated. As was shown in Figure 7, ΔF reached a maximum with 0.4 mL of 5.0% CTAB added and was kept constant in the CTAB volume range of 0.4–1.0 mL. In this work, 0.5 mL 5.0% of CTAB was chosen for the following experiments.Figure 7
Effect of the amount of CTAB on fluorescence intensity.CCr(VI): 1.00 μg/mL CTRCA: 3.4×10-5mol/L.


## 3.3.4. Effect of Temperature and Time

The effects of temperature (10–50°C) and time (0–50 min) onΔF were tested. It was found that ΔF was steady ranging from 20 to 40°C and 25 to 50 min. Therefore, the suitable temperature of 30±1°C and preparation time of 30 min were recommended for the work.


## 3.4. Effect of Foreign Substances

The effects of the different foreign substrates were discussed on the determination of the 1.00μg/mL of Cr(VI). The results were shown in Table 2. It was observed that most of the common metal ions and dye molecules did not influence the determination of Cr(VI).Table 2
Effect of interfering substances on fluorescence.
Foreign ions
Foreign/Cr(VI) (w/w)
Na+
500.00
K+
500.00
N
H
4
+
300.00
Mg2+
200.00
Cu2+
10.00
Zn2+
10.00
Ca2+
10.00
Ni2+
10.00
Cr3+
3.00
Pb2+
2.00
Cd2+
2.00
Hg2+
1.00
Cl−
500.00
Br−
500.00
Ac−
300.00
CO
3
2
-
200.00
SO
4
2
-
200.00
NO
3
-
100.00


## 3.5. Effect of H2O2 Amount

The total chromium was determined after oxidizing Cr(III) to Cr(VI). The appropriate oxidant was (1) quantitatively oxidize Cr(III) to Cr(VI); (2) there was no quenching effect for the fluorescence intensity of TRCA. In this paper, 0.1% H2O2 was chosen as oxidant. So, the oxidation rate of Cr(III) and the effect of H2O2 on the fluorescence intensity of TRCA were investigated (Figure 8). As could be seen in Figure 8 that (1)  FTRCA was decreased when the amount of 0.1% H2O2 was 0.2 mL; (2) the oxidation ratio exceeded 95% and was almost constant when the amount of 0.1% H2O2, was more than 0.1 mL. So, 0.1 mL 0.1% of H2O2 was chosen for the oxidation of 1.00 μg/mL Cr(III).Figure 8
Effect of the amount of H2O2. (CCr(III): 1.00 μg/mL CTRCA: 3.4×10-5mol/L).


## 3.6. Analytical Performance

Under the optimum conditions, the linear regression equation wasΔF=15.39+288.68c (μg/mL) with a correlation coefficient of R=0.9966. A linear relationship was observed over the range of 0.10~5.00 μg/mL. The detection limit estimated (S/N = 3) was 0.024 μg/mL, RSD was 2.1% (n=3,c=1.00 μg/mL).


## 3.7. Sample Analysis

In order to verify the feasibility of the method, the proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in reference water samples (GSBZ50027-94 and GBW(E)080642) and real water samples (laboratory water samples). As could be seen in Tables3 and 4, the determined values were in good agreement with the certified values, and the relative recoveries in the range of 102.0%–103.0% were obtained by determination of spiked real samples.Table 3
Analysis of certified reference materials (mean ± S.D.,n=3).
Sample
Certified value (µg mL−1)
Found (µg mL−1)
Total Cr recovery (%)
Cr(VI)
Cr(III)
Total Cr
Cr(VI)
Cr(III)a
Total Cr
GSBZ50027-94
0.40
±
0.01
—
—
0.42
±
0.01
ND
0.42
±
0.01
105.0
GBW(E)080642
—
—
100.00
±
5.00
24.80
±
1.30
73.24
±
3.04
98.04
±
3.04
98.0
ND: not detected;athe concentration of Cr(III) was calculated by subtracting of Cr(VI ) from the total chromium.Table 4
Determination of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in real water samples (mean ± S.D.,n=3).
Sample
Added (µg mL−1)
Found (µg mL−1)
Recovery (%)
Cr(VI)
Cr(III)
Cr(VI)
Cr(III)a
Total Cr
Cr(VI)
Cr(III)
Total Cr
Tap water
0
0
ND
ND
ND
—
—
—
0.25
0.25
0
.
2
4
±
0
.
01
0
.
2
6
±
0
.
01
0
.
51
±
0.0
1
96.0
104.0
102.0
0.50
0.50
0
.
5
2
±
0
.
01
0
.
51
±
0
.
01
1
.
0
3
±
0
.
01
104.0
102.0
103.0
ND: Not detected;aThe concentration of Cr(III) was calculated by subtracting of Cr(VI ) from the total chromium.


## 3.8. Discussion of Mechanism

### 3.8.1. The Interaction of TRCA and Cr(VI)

TRCA is an easy-to-select modification of both the upper and lower edges, with the benzene ring units composed of hydrophobic cavities, which have a truncated cone structure which could tie with ionic object or pack neutral molecules [28]. This special molecular structure could include guest molecule (Cr(VI)) which had matched polarity, size, shape, and property into their hydrophobic cavities to form inclusion complexes, which may affect the fluorescence intensity of TRCA.According to the Benesi-Hildebrand method, it was found that the double reciprocal plot of TRCA-Cr(VI) had good linear relationships (Figure9), which could support the formation of a 1 : 1 complex, and the inclusion constant K for Cr(VI) was 7.29×103L/mol. The larger the value of K, the more steady the inclusion complex. While, the same method was applied to investigate the interaction of TRCA and Cr(III), the results indicated that there was no interaction between them.Figure 9
Double reciprocal plot of Cr(VI) in TRCA. (CTRCA: 3.4×10-5mol/L).


### 3.8.2. IR Spectra Characterization

From Figure10 (curve 1: TRCA, curve 2: TRCA-Cr(VI)), carbonyl peak (1728 cm−1) of TRCA disappeared and new peaks appeared at about 1683 cm−1, which proved that Cr(VI) was interacting with the carbonyl of TRCA. Therefore, the reasonable configuration of interaction of TRCA and Cr(VI) may be shown in Figure 11.Figure 10
The IR spectra (1: TRCA; 2: TRCA-Cr(VI)).Figure 11
The configuration of inclusion (TRCA-Cr(VI)).


### 3.8.3. The Sensitizing Effect of CTAB

Generally speaking, it was demonstrated that the sensitizing effect of CTAB on spectrofluorimetry rested on two factors:(1) the solubilization capacity and (2) the microenvironment of medium [34]. In order to discuss the influence of the microenvironment on the fluorescence intensity of TRCA, the fluorescence quantum yields Yu in various media were determined, respectively (Table 5). Yu of TRCA in the presence of CTAB was approximately 2.0 times higher than that in the absence of CTAB. The fluorescence quantum yield was one of the mostly basic and significant parameters in all the characters of fluorescence substance [35], which represented the ability of translating absorption energy to fluorescence and was tightly related to chemical structure and microenvironment of the system [36]. The Yu value is higher, the ability of translating absorption energy to fluorescence is stronger. What is more, ΔF=FTRCA-FCr(VI)-TRCA, where ΔF must increase as the increasing of fluorescence quantum yield of TRCA. Therefore, the fluorescence intensity was higher in the CTAB micelle than that in H2O medium because the CTAB micelle could better accommodate the microenvironment. In other words, CTAB was able to decrease the self-fluorescence quenching of TRCA and the fluorescence quenching effort of the external quencher. So, CTAB had sensitizing effect on TRCA and the fluorescence quenching value (ΔF) of the Cr(VI)-TRCA system.Table 5
Y
u value of TRCA in different mediums.
Medium
Y
u
H2O
0.045
5% CTAB
0.089


## 3.8.1. The Interaction of TRCA and Cr(VI)

TRCA is an easy-to-select modification of both the upper and lower edges, with the benzene ring units composed of hydrophobic cavities, which have a truncated cone structure which could tie with ionic object or pack neutral molecules [28]. This special molecular structure could include guest molecule (Cr(VI)) which had matched polarity, size, shape, and property into their hydrophobic cavities to form inclusion complexes, which may affect the fluorescence intensity of TRCA.According to the Benesi-Hildebrand method, it was found that the double reciprocal plot of TRCA-Cr(VI) had good linear relationships (Figure9), which could support the formation of a 1 : 1 complex, and the inclusion constant K for Cr(VI) was 7.29×103L/mol. The larger the value of K, the more steady the inclusion complex. While, the same method was applied to investigate the interaction of TRCA and Cr(III), the results indicated that there was no interaction between them.Figure 9
Double reciprocal plot of Cr(VI) in TRCA. (CTRCA: 3.4×10-5mol/L).


## 3.8.2. IR Spectra Characterization

From Figure10 (curve 1: TRCA, curve 2: TRCA-Cr(VI)), carbonyl peak (1728 cm−1) of TRCA disappeared and new peaks appeared at about 1683 cm−1, which proved that Cr(VI) was interacting with the carbonyl of TRCA. Therefore, the reasonable configuration of interaction of TRCA and Cr(VI) may be shown in Figure 11.Figure 10
The IR spectra (1: TRCA; 2: TRCA-Cr(VI)).Figure 11
The configuration of inclusion (TRCA-Cr(VI)).


## 3.8.3. The Sensitizing Effect of CTAB

Generally speaking, it was demonstrated that the sensitizing effect of CTAB on spectrofluorimetry rested on two factors:(1) the solubilization capacity and (2) the microenvironment of medium [34]. In order to discuss the influence of the microenvironment on the fluorescence intensity of TRCA, the fluorescence quantum yields Yu in various media were determined, respectively (Table 5). Yu of TRCA in the presence of CTAB was approximately 2.0 times higher than that in the absence of CTAB. The fluorescence quantum yield was one of the mostly basic and significant parameters in all the characters of fluorescence substance [35], which represented the ability of translating absorption energy to fluorescence and was tightly related to chemical structure and microenvironment of the system [36]. The Yu value is higher, the ability of translating absorption energy to fluorescence is stronger. What is more, ΔF=FTRCA-FCr(VI)-TRCA, where ΔF must increase as the increasing of fluorescence quantum yield of TRCA. Therefore, the fluorescence intensity was higher in the CTAB micelle than that in H2O medium because the CTAB micelle could better accommodate the microenvironment. In other words, CTAB was able to decrease the self-fluorescence quenching of TRCA and the fluorescence quenching effort of the external quencher. So, CTAB had sensitizing effect on TRCA and the fluorescence quenching value (ΔF) of the Cr(VI)-TRCA system.Table 5
Y
u value of TRCA in different mediums.
Medium
Y
u
H2O
0.045
5% CTAB
0.089


## 4. Conclusion

In this paper, the fluorescence intensity of TRCA was quenched due to Cr(VI)-TRCA to form a complex, and the fluorescence quenching value (ΔF) was increased in CTAB medium. Based on this, a novel fluorescence quenching method for the determination of Cr(VI) has been developed. In comparison with ultraviolet visible absorption spectrometry (UV-Vis) [6], flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) [8–11], this present method seems to be simpler, faster, and of lower cost with better detection limit and selectivity. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first example that involves the complexation of 4,10,16,22-tetramethoxyl resorcinarene carboxylic acid derivatives with Cr(VI).



---

*Source: 409480-2013-09-02.xml*