# Hydroxysafflor Yellow A Inhibits TNF-α-Induced Inflammation of Human Fetal Lung Fibroblasts via NF-κB Signaling Pathway

Authors: Sen Liu; Yan Wang; Huijuan Wen; Xiaofang Sun; Yu Wang
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Objective. Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HSYA), an effective ingredient of the Chinese herb Carthamus tinctorius L, attenuated bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. This study is to investigate the effect of HSYA on the proliferation and inflammatory level of human fetal lung fibroblasts (MRC-5 cells) induced by tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and explore the underlying mechanisms. Methods. MRC-5 cells were treated with different concentrations of TNF-α, HSYA, or/and etanercept (ENCP, TNF-α receptor (TNFR1) antagonist, 500 ng/mL) before cell proliferation was detected. The laser confocal microscope was used to observe the role of HSYA in binding of TNF-α and its receptor. Co-immunoprecipitation was used to detect the binding of TNFR1 and TAK1-TAB2 complex. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR and western blot were used to detect the expressions of inflammation-related cytokines and proteins related with the NF-κB pathway. Luciferase reporter gene assay and chromatin coprecipitation method were used to detect the interaction between AP-1 and TGF-β1 promoter. Results. TNF-α (5 ng/mL) was used to induce inflammation and proliferation in MRC-5 cells. HSYA can partially suppress the stimulation of TNF-α on proliferation and inflammatory response of MRC-5 cells. HSYA could compete with TNF-α to bind with TNFR1 and hamper the binding of TNFR1 to TAK1-TAB2 complex. In addition, HSYA could also inhibit the activation of the NF-κB signal pathway and suppress the binding of TGF-β1 promoter with AP-1. Conclusion. Evidence in this study suggested that HSYA affects TNF-α-induced proliferation and inflammatory response of MRC-5 cells through the NF-κB/AP-1 signaling pathway, which may provide theoretical basis for HSYA treatment in pulmonary fibrosis.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a slowly and progressing interstitial lung disease with poor prognosis is featured by accumulation of fibroblasts (FB) and remodeling of extracellular matrix (ECM) [1]. FB, known as mesenchymal cells, play an important role in normal and fibrotic repair processes and can be activated to differentiate into smooth muscle-like cells with high secretion and contraction, named myofibroblasts (MF) [2]. MF has been well established for its implication in tissue remodeling, fibrotic lesion and organ dysfunction by hampering or inhibiting cell apoptosis on wound epithelialization [3]. In response to stimulation of IL-1α and IL-1β released from wound healing and fibrosis progression, fibrocytes can stimulate the secretion of cytokines including IL-13, TGF-β, CTGF, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) that enhance the proliferation, migration, and extracellular matrix production of FB [4, 5]. Until now, pulmonary fibrosis has been bemused among medical authority for its uncertain etiology and to explore effective pharmacologic therapy has been urgent concerned [6]. Fortunately, evidence has reported TNF-α plays a vital role in the progress of pulmonary fibrosis [7]. Thus, FB and MF represent an attractive target for the treatment of IPF.Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HSYA), as a water-soluble compound isolated from safflower, is a traditional Chinese medicine exerting function of blood circulation and removing blood stasis [8, 9]. HSYA possesses several pharmacological properties, for instance, anti-inflammation, antioxidant, and cardiovascular protection [10]. Also, HSYA’s antihepatic and renal fibrosis function has been reported [10], in addition to its inhibitory function on proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells [11]. But whether HSYA can directly suppress the viability of TNF-α treated lung FB has remained uncertainly by now.TNF-α, an inducer of inflammatory responses, upregulates many genes including cytokines [12]. TGF-β1, as a multifunctional cytokine is abundantly expressed in many epithelial tumors, which cooperates with TNF-α to enhance the activation of multiple signaling pathways, including the NF-κB signal pathway [13]. Furthermore, HSYA blocks angiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma through suppressing ERK/MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathway in H22 tumor-bearing mice [14], implicating the regulatory role of HSYA on the NF-κB signal pathway. However, whether HSYA can regulate the biological activity of FB in pulmonary fibrosis through the NF-κB signal pathway remains an area of active research. For this reason, we aimed to explore the role of HSYA on TNF-α induced inflammatory response and proliferation of human fetal lung FB (MRC-5 cells) and then investigated its underlying mechanisms.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Preparation and High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analysis of HSYA

Safflower, the dried flower ofCarthamus tinctorius L, is a member of the family Compositae or Asteraceae. Safflower was purchased from Huahui kaide Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Shanxi, China) and identified by Professor Jiashi Li of Beijing University of traditional Chinese medicine. The macroporous resin-gel column chromatography technique was utilized to isolate and purify HSYA from the aqueous extract of Carthamus tinctorius L [15]. The molecular weight and structure of HSYA were previously reported [16]. The purity of HSYA was analyzed by the HPLC system [17], and the extracted HSYA was dissolved in sterile normal saline for subsequent experiments. The purity of HSYA was 95.34% (Figure 1(a)) by the area normalization method for HPLC [15].Figure 1
Effect of HSYA on TNF-α-induced proliferation and inflammatory response of MRC-5 cells. (a), (e), and (h), MTT assays were used to detect the effect of TNF-α or/and HSYA on the proliferation of MRC-5 cells; (b), (f), and (i), quantitative RT-PCR was used to detect the mRNA expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1; (c), (g), and (j), IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 protein expression levels were determined by western blot analysis; (d); high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis of HSYA; HSYA retention time was 20 min; HSYA, hydroxysafflor yellow A; ∗P<0.05; ∗∗P<0.01; ∗∗∗P<0.001.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)


### 2.2. Cell Culture and Treatment

MRC-5 cells were purchased from the cell center of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) and maintained in MEM culture medium (Thermo Scientific) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Thermo Scientific, Walton, MA, USA), 1% nonessential amino acids (Keygen, China), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100μg/ml streptomycin (Thermo Scientific). Cells were incubated for 24 h and then starved for 12 h in serum-free MEM strictly according to cell culture instructions. Cells were pretreated with HSYA (5, 15, or 45 μmol/L, diluted with normal saline) for 30 min and then incubated with 500 ng/mL TNF-α receptor antagonist ENCP (diluted with DMSO) (Enbrel(®)) for 30 min. Subsequently, TNF-α was added to co-culture for 24 h for following experimental analysis. During the experiment, equivalent volumes of solvent were added as negative controls for HSYA, TNF-α, and ENCP.


### 2.3. MTT Assay

MRC-5 cells were counted after treatment for 24 h and/or 48 h, respectively. Then, 100μL of cell suspension (104 to 105 cells) was then placed in 96-well plates for incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2. Three duplicate wells were set for each group. After that, cells were then added with 20 μL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL, Sigma, USA) in an incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. After 4 h of incubation, the culture medium was removed and 150 μL of DMSO was then added to each well and shake gently for 10 min to promote the solubility of crystallization. Finally, the absorbance value (OD490 value) of each well was measured at 490 nm wavelength on the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Set absorbance value as ordinate and time as abscissa to draw the MTT curve. The absorbance value of each group was measured repeatedly for three times to obtain the average value.


### 2.4. Immunofluorescence Assay

MRC-5 cells were cultured on 6-well plates covered with coverslips for 24 h and starved with serum-free MEM culture medium for 12 h. Cells were then treated with 45μmol/L HSYA or ENCP for 30 min and stimulated by TNF-α for 24 h. PBS wash is done 3 times before 4% paraformaldehyde (Thermo Scientific) used for fixation at room temperature for 20 min and PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for permeation for 10 min. Cells were washed with PBS and then sealed with 1:50 sheep serum for 30 min, followed by 3 PBS washes (5 min each time). Anti-TNFR1 primary antibody was added for incubation for 2 h at room temperature, and after that, cells were washed with 3 × PBS and incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG labeled with Tex red for 1 h. Each well was washed with 3 × PBS. Cells were then incubated with FITC-labeled TNF-α for 2 h. Nucleus was stained with DAPI (4′, 6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Vector laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) for 5 min at room temperature. Fluorescence images were analyzed by confocal microscopy (Olympus, Japan).


### 2.5. Co-Immunoprecipitation Experiments (Co-IP)

MRC-5 cells were treated with 2.5 ng/mL of TNF-α or 45 μmol/L of HSYA for 48 h before protein supernatant was collected. Then, 400 μL of supernatant was used for IP experiment and incubated with TNFR1 antibody or IgG antibody (as negative control) at 4°C overnight. At that time, Protein G beads were added and incubated for 3 ∼ 5 h in rotation at 4°C. Then, the incubated mixture was centrifuged at 1,000 g at 4°C for 5 min. After that, supernatant was discarded, immune mixture were collected, and subsequently it washed 3 times using washing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl/pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl 2, 5 mM MGC L2, 0.1% Nonidet P-40); the precipitate was then finally resuspended with 1 × SDS-PAGE loading buffer. Then, the proteins were subjected to a metal bath at 100°C for 5 min and loaded with 10% polyacrylamide gel for electrophoresis. At last, the protein band separated was transferred to PVDF membrane. TAK1 (ab109526, 1:1000, Abcam, USA) and TAB2 (ab153882, 1:500, Abcam, USA) antibodies were used as primary antibody, and goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000, Beijing ComWin Biotech Co., Ltd) was used as secondary antibody for western blot analysis.


### 2.6. Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Analysis

MRC-5 cells were firstly dissolved in 1 ml of Trizol (Invitrogen Company), and RNA was extracted according to Trizol instructions. After quantification, RNA was then reversely transcribed into cDNA. Further, the PCR reaction system was configured according to fluorescence-quantitative PCR kit (Takara, Dali, China) instructions. The real-time quantitative RT-PCR experiment was carried out by ABI7500 quantitative PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) with the reaction conditions of predenaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, annealing at 60°C for 20 s, and extension at 72°C for 34 s. RT-PCR primers were as follows: IL-1β primer (IL-1β-F: 5′-ATAAGCCCACTCTACACCT-3′, IL-1β-R: 5′-ATTGGCCCTGAAAGGAGAGA-3′), IL-6 pri-mer (IL-6-F: 5′-GCTTCGGTCCAGTCCTT-3′, IL-6-R: 5′-A-GTGCCTTGCTGCTTTCAC-3′), TGF-β1 primer (TGF-β 1-F: 5′-AGGGCTACCATGCCAACTTC-3′, TGF-β 1-R: 5′-GCGGCACGCAGCACTGAT-3′), TGF-β1 primer (TGF-β1-TA-F: 5′-AGTATGAGTGCTGCGGTTCC-3′, TGF-β1-TA-R: 5′-TGAGGCCAGAGGAGTAACCA-3′), GAPDH primer (GAPDP-F: 5′-GAAGGTGAGGGAGTGAGTTC-3′, GAPDH-R: 5′-GAAGAGGTGAGGGATTC-3′). All primers were synthesized by GENEWIZ, Inc. The internal reference of miRNA was U6, and the internal reference of mRNA was GAPDH. The data analysis was conducted by the 2−ΔΔCt method, with the following formula: ΔΔCt =[Ct(target gene) − Ct(reference gene)]experimental group − [Ct(target gene) − Ct(reference gene)]control group.


### 2.7. Western Blot Analysis

The MRC-5 cells treated for 48 h were washed with precooled PBS buffer for 3 times and then added with protein extraction lysis buffer in a 100μL/50 mL culture flask on ice for 30 min. Subsequently, under the condition of 12,000 rpm at 4°C, lysis buffer was then centrifuged for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and split into 0.5 mL centrifuge tubes for storage in −20°C or quantification using a BCA kit. Next, 6 × SDS loading buffer was added at 100°C for protein denaturation. The protein was then separated by SDS electrophoresis, and the membrane was transferred by a precooled transfer buffer at 4°C for 1.5 h. The membrane was then blocked with 5% nonfat milk in TBST buffer for 1 h. TBST configured primary antibodies of IL-1β (ab2105, 1:200), TGF-β1 (ab92486, 1:500, Abcam, USA), IL-6 (sc-28343, 1:200, Santa Cruz, CA), Phospho-IKKα/β (2697, 1:200, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), IKKβ (8943, 1:500, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), Phospho-NF-κB p65 (3033, 1:200, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), NF-κB p65 (8242, 1:500, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), IκBα (9242, 1:500, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), and β-actin (ab4970s, 1: 1000, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA) were separately incubated at 4°C overnight before TBST wash for 3 × 10 min. After that, goat anti-rabbit IgG or goat anti-mouse IgG was used for incubation for 2 h at room temperature (1:5000, Beijing ComWin Biotech Co., Ltd), followed by TBST wash. Expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TGF-β1, and β-actin was determined after color development.


### 2.8. Dual-Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay

The designed TGF-β1 promoter-TA-luc fragment and TGF-β1 promoter mutant fragment were cloned and bound to the Promega vector (named WT-TGF-β1-TA and MT-TGF-β1-TA, respectively). The constructed vector and Tag-AP-1 plasmid (designed and synthesized by GenePharma, Shanghai, China) were transfected into TNF-α stimulated MRC-5 cells, followed by treatment with or without HSYA (45 μmol/L). After 48 h, fluorescence intensity of each group was measured using a luciferase kit (Beijing Yuanpinghao Biotechnology Co., Ltd.).


### 2.9. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis (ChIP)

TNF-α (2.5 ng/mL) stimulated MRC-5 cells were treated with/without 45 μmol/L HSYA for 8 h. Then, cells were transfected with WT-TGF-β1-TA and Tag-AP-1 plasmids, and 48 h later, cells were fixed by 37% formaldehyde to a final concentration of 1%. The fixation reactions were terminated by adding 10 ml of glycine. Then, cells were exfoliated with cell scraping solution containing protease inhibitor, centrifuged, precipitated, and resuspended with 1 ml precooled SDS lysate. The prepared sample was subjected to ultrasonic fragmentation (output power 5 W, 4 times, 10 s each) (sonifier 450 type, Branson, USA) to break chromatin into 200∼1000 bp on ice, with ultrasonic interval of 40 s each time. AP-1 antibody (4.0 μg, ab21981, Abcam, USA) or negative control IgG antibody and positive control c-jun polyclonal antibody (Santa cruz, USA) were added to chromatin centrifuge tubes after elimination of nonspecific antibody for overnight at 4°C. Then, 60 μL of Protein G was added for incubation on a shaker at 4°C. When IgG/DNA, c-jun/DNA, and AP-1/DNA complexes were eluted using eluent, 8 μl of 5 mol/L NaCL was added overnight in 65°C water bath to de-crosslink. DNA was purified by using the ChIP kit (UPSTATE, USA), and the purified DNA was used for quantitative PCR detection. PCR products (10 μl) were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis with mass fraction of 2.0%. Input DNA, used as positive control, is de-crosslinked and purified genomic DNA after nonspecific antibodies were eliminated.


### 2.10. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed by SPSS 18.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6.0. The statistical significance between two sets of data was calculated usingT test. While one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to measure multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was regarded as a P value of <0.05.


## 2.1. Preparation and High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analysis of HSYA

Safflower, the dried flower ofCarthamus tinctorius L, is a member of the family Compositae or Asteraceae. Safflower was purchased from Huahui kaide Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Shanxi, China) and identified by Professor Jiashi Li of Beijing University of traditional Chinese medicine. The macroporous resin-gel column chromatography technique was utilized to isolate and purify HSYA from the aqueous extract of Carthamus tinctorius L [15]. The molecular weight and structure of HSYA were previously reported [16]. The purity of HSYA was analyzed by the HPLC system [17], and the extracted HSYA was dissolved in sterile normal saline for subsequent experiments. The purity of HSYA was 95.34% (Figure 1(a)) by the area normalization method for HPLC [15].Figure 1
Effect of HSYA on TNF-α-induced proliferation and inflammatory response of MRC-5 cells. (a), (e), and (h), MTT assays were used to detect the effect of TNF-α or/and HSYA on the proliferation of MRC-5 cells; (b), (f), and (i), quantitative RT-PCR was used to detect the mRNA expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1; (c), (g), and (j), IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 protein expression levels were determined by western blot analysis; (d); high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis of HSYA; HSYA retention time was 20 min; HSYA, hydroxysafflor yellow A; ∗P<0.05; ∗∗P<0.01; ∗∗∗P<0.001.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)


## 2.2. Cell Culture and Treatment

MRC-5 cells were purchased from the cell center of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) and maintained in MEM culture medium (Thermo Scientific) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Thermo Scientific, Walton, MA, USA), 1% nonessential amino acids (Keygen, China), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100μg/ml streptomycin (Thermo Scientific). Cells were incubated for 24 h and then starved for 12 h in serum-free MEM strictly according to cell culture instructions. Cells were pretreated with HSYA (5, 15, or 45 μmol/L, diluted with normal saline) for 30 min and then incubated with 500 ng/mL TNF-α receptor antagonist ENCP (diluted with DMSO) (Enbrel(®)) for 30 min. Subsequently, TNF-α was added to co-culture for 24 h for following experimental analysis. During the experiment, equivalent volumes of solvent were added as negative controls for HSYA, TNF-α, and ENCP.


## 2.3. MTT Assay

MRC-5 cells were counted after treatment for 24 h and/or 48 h, respectively. Then, 100μL of cell suspension (104 to 105 cells) was then placed in 96-well plates for incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2. Three duplicate wells were set for each group. After that, cells were then added with 20 μL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL, Sigma, USA) in an incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. After 4 h of incubation, the culture medium was removed and 150 μL of DMSO was then added to each well and shake gently for 10 min to promote the solubility of crystallization. Finally, the absorbance value (OD490 value) of each well was measured at 490 nm wavelength on the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Set absorbance value as ordinate and time as abscissa to draw the MTT curve. The absorbance value of each group was measured repeatedly for three times to obtain the average value.


## 2.4. Immunofluorescence Assay

MRC-5 cells were cultured on 6-well plates covered with coverslips for 24 h and starved with serum-free MEM culture medium for 12 h. Cells were then treated with 45μmol/L HSYA or ENCP for 30 min and stimulated by TNF-α for 24 h. PBS wash is done 3 times before 4% paraformaldehyde (Thermo Scientific) used for fixation at room temperature for 20 min and PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for permeation for 10 min. Cells were washed with PBS and then sealed with 1:50 sheep serum for 30 min, followed by 3 PBS washes (5 min each time). Anti-TNFR1 primary antibody was added for incubation for 2 h at room temperature, and after that, cells were washed with 3 × PBS and incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG labeled with Tex red for 1 h. Each well was washed with 3 × PBS. Cells were then incubated with FITC-labeled TNF-α for 2 h. Nucleus was stained with DAPI (4′, 6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Vector laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) for 5 min at room temperature. Fluorescence images were analyzed by confocal microscopy (Olympus, Japan).


## 2.5. Co-Immunoprecipitation Experiments (Co-IP)

MRC-5 cells were treated with 2.5 ng/mL of TNF-α or 45 μmol/L of HSYA for 48 h before protein supernatant was collected. Then, 400 μL of supernatant was used for IP experiment and incubated with TNFR1 antibody or IgG antibody (as negative control) at 4°C overnight. At that time, Protein G beads were added and incubated for 3 ∼ 5 h in rotation at 4°C. Then, the incubated mixture was centrifuged at 1,000 g at 4°C for 5 min. After that, supernatant was discarded, immune mixture were collected, and subsequently it washed 3 times using washing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl/pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl 2, 5 mM MGC L2, 0.1% Nonidet P-40); the precipitate was then finally resuspended with 1 × SDS-PAGE loading buffer. Then, the proteins were subjected to a metal bath at 100°C for 5 min and loaded with 10% polyacrylamide gel for electrophoresis. At last, the protein band separated was transferred to PVDF membrane. TAK1 (ab109526, 1:1000, Abcam, USA) and TAB2 (ab153882, 1:500, Abcam, USA) antibodies were used as primary antibody, and goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000, Beijing ComWin Biotech Co., Ltd) was used as secondary antibody for western blot analysis.


## 2.6. Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Analysis

MRC-5 cells were firstly dissolved in 1 ml of Trizol (Invitrogen Company), and RNA was extracted according to Trizol instructions. After quantification, RNA was then reversely transcribed into cDNA. Further, the PCR reaction system was configured according to fluorescence-quantitative PCR kit (Takara, Dali, China) instructions. The real-time quantitative RT-PCR experiment was carried out by ABI7500 quantitative PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) with the reaction conditions of predenaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, annealing at 60°C for 20 s, and extension at 72°C for 34 s. RT-PCR primers were as follows: IL-1β primer (IL-1β-F: 5′-ATAAGCCCACTCTACACCT-3′, IL-1β-R: 5′-ATTGGCCCTGAAAGGAGAGA-3′), IL-6 pri-mer (IL-6-F: 5′-GCTTCGGTCCAGTCCTT-3′, IL-6-R: 5′-A-GTGCCTTGCTGCTTTCAC-3′), TGF-β1 primer (TGF-β 1-F: 5′-AGGGCTACCATGCCAACTTC-3′, TGF-β 1-R: 5′-GCGGCACGCAGCACTGAT-3′), TGF-β1 primer (TGF-β1-TA-F: 5′-AGTATGAGTGCTGCGGTTCC-3′, TGF-β1-TA-R: 5′-TGAGGCCAGAGGAGTAACCA-3′), GAPDH primer (GAPDP-F: 5′-GAAGGTGAGGGAGTGAGTTC-3′, GAPDH-R: 5′-GAAGAGGTGAGGGATTC-3′). All primers were synthesized by GENEWIZ, Inc. The internal reference of miRNA was U6, and the internal reference of mRNA was GAPDH. The data analysis was conducted by the 2−ΔΔCt method, with the following formula: ΔΔCt =[Ct(target gene) − Ct(reference gene)]experimental group − [Ct(target gene) − Ct(reference gene)]control group.


## 2.7. Western Blot Analysis

The MRC-5 cells treated for 48 h were washed with precooled PBS buffer for 3 times and then added with protein extraction lysis buffer in a 100μL/50 mL culture flask on ice for 30 min. Subsequently, under the condition of 12,000 rpm at 4°C, lysis buffer was then centrifuged for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and split into 0.5 mL centrifuge tubes for storage in −20°C or quantification using a BCA kit. Next, 6 × SDS loading buffer was added at 100°C for protein denaturation. The protein was then separated by SDS electrophoresis, and the membrane was transferred by a precooled transfer buffer at 4°C for 1.5 h. The membrane was then blocked with 5% nonfat milk in TBST buffer for 1 h. TBST configured primary antibodies of IL-1β (ab2105, 1:200), TGF-β1 (ab92486, 1:500, Abcam, USA), IL-6 (sc-28343, 1:200, Santa Cruz, CA), Phospho-IKKα/β (2697, 1:200, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), IKKβ (8943, 1:500, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), Phospho-NF-κB p65 (3033, 1:200, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), NF-κB p65 (8242, 1:500, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), IκBα (9242, 1:500, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), and β-actin (ab4970s, 1: 1000, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA) were separately incubated at 4°C overnight before TBST wash for 3 × 10 min. After that, goat anti-rabbit IgG or goat anti-mouse IgG was used for incubation for 2 h at room temperature (1:5000, Beijing ComWin Biotech Co., Ltd), followed by TBST wash. Expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TGF-β1, and β-actin was determined after color development.


## 2.8. Dual-Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay

The designed TGF-β1 promoter-TA-luc fragment and TGF-β1 promoter mutant fragment were cloned and bound to the Promega vector (named WT-TGF-β1-TA and MT-TGF-β1-TA, respectively). The constructed vector and Tag-AP-1 plasmid (designed and synthesized by GenePharma, Shanghai, China) were transfected into TNF-α stimulated MRC-5 cells, followed by treatment with or without HSYA (45 μmol/L). After 48 h, fluorescence intensity of each group was measured using a luciferase kit (Beijing Yuanpinghao Biotechnology Co., Ltd.).


## 2.9. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis (ChIP)

TNF-α (2.5 ng/mL) stimulated MRC-5 cells were treated with/without 45 μmol/L HSYA for 8 h. Then, cells were transfected with WT-TGF-β1-TA and Tag-AP-1 plasmids, and 48 h later, cells were fixed by 37% formaldehyde to a final concentration of 1%. The fixation reactions were terminated by adding 10 ml of glycine. Then, cells were exfoliated with cell scraping solution containing protease inhibitor, centrifuged, precipitated, and resuspended with 1 ml precooled SDS lysate. The prepared sample was subjected to ultrasonic fragmentation (output power 5 W, 4 times, 10 s each) (sonifier 450 type, Branson, USA) to break chromatin into 200∼1000 bp on ice, with ultrasonic interval of 40 s each time. AP-1 antibody (4.0 μg, ab21981, Abcam, USA) or negative control IgG antibody and positive control c-jun polyclonal antibody (Santa cruz, USA) were added to chromatin centrifuge tubes after elimination of nonspecific antibody for overnight at 4°C. Then, 60 μL of Protein G was added for incubation on a shaker at 4°C. When IgG/DNA, c-jun/DNA, and AP-1/DNA complexes were eluted using eluent, 8 μl of 5 mol/L NaCL was added overnight in 65°C water bath to de-crosslink. DNA was purified by using the ChIP kit (UPSTATE, USA), and the purified DNA was used for quantitative PCR detection. PCR products (10 μl) were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis with mass fraction of 2.0%. Input DNA, used as positive control, is de-crosslinked and purified genomic DNA after nonspecific antibodies were eliminated.


## 2.10. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed by SPSS 18.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6.0. The statistical significance between two sets of data was calculated usingT test. While one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to measure multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was regarded as a P value of <0.05.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. HSYA Inhibits TNF-α Induced Proliferation and Inflammation in MRC-5 Cells

MRC-5 cells were stimulated by TNF-α at concentrations of 0, 2.5, 5, 7.,5 and 10 ng/mL. After 48 h, the effects of different concentrations of TNF-α on the proliferation of MRC-5 cells were determined. The results showed that the 5 ng/mL TNF-α treatment could markedly promote the proliferation of MRC-5 cells (Figure 1(a), P<0.01), as well as increasing the mRNA and the expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 (Figures 1(b) and 1(c), P<0.01), compared with 0 ng/mL TNF-α treatment. The 2.5 and 7.5 ng/mL TNF-α could slightly promote MRC-5 cell proliferation, while 10 ng/mL TNF-α treatment could not promote the proliferation of MRC-5 cells (all P>0.05). As shown in Figure 1(a), 7.5 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL TNF-α treatment could markedly promote mRNA and protein expression levels of inflammatory factors IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 (Figures 1(b) and 1(c), P<0.01). Taken together, 5 ng/mL TNF-α was used for subsequent experiments.Next, this paper explored the effect of HSYA on TNF-α induced proliferation and inflammatory response of lung FB. The analysis result of HSYA by high-pressure liquid chromatography is presented in Figure 1(d), and its purity is 95.34%. MRC-5 cells were treated with different concentrations of HSYA. Results after 48 h treatment showed that compared with cells without HSYA treatment, there was no obvious difference in cell proliferation (Figure 1(e), P>0.05) as well as the mRNA and protein expression levels of inflammatory factors IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 in cells subjected to 5, 15, and 45 μmol/L HSYA treatment (Figures 1(f) and 1(g), P>0.05), which proved that HSYA had no toxic or side effects on normal cells. Compared with the TNF-α group, the TNF-α + HSYA (5 μmol/L) group has no obvious effect on cell proliferation, while the TNF-α + HSYA (15 μmol/L) group and TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) group can significantly inhibit cell proliferation (Figure 1(h), P<0.01), indicating that HSYA could suppress TNF-α induced proliferation of MRC-5 cells in a dose-dependent manner.Quantitative RT-PCR and western blot experiments showed that compared with the TNF-α group, the mRNA and protein expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 in the TNF-α + HSYA (5 μmol/L) group had no distinct difference, while the mRNA and protein expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 in the TNF-α + HSYA(15 μmol/L) group and TNF-α + HSYA(45 μmol/L) group were significantly reduced (Figures 1(i) and 1(j), P<0.01). These results indicate that HSYA can inhibit TNF-α induced proliferation and inflammatory response in MRC-5 cells.


### 3.2. HSYA Competes with TNF-α to Bind with TNFR1

Next, in this step, we surmise that HSYA regulates TNF-α stimulated MRC-5 cells proliferation and expression of inflammatory factors by competing with TNF-α to bind with its receptor TNFR1. The experimental results showed that, compared with the TNF-α + ENCP group, no obvious difference on OD value and mRNA and protein expression levels of inflammatory factors IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 in the TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) + ENCP group was found (Figures 2(a)–2(d)). Comprehensive previous studies showed that HSYA can inhibit TNF-α stimulated proliferation and inflammatory response of MRC-5 cells, while TNFR1 antagonist ENCP could hamper the inhibitory effect of HSYA on TNF-α induced cell proliferation and inflammatory response. We further performed immunofluorescence experiments and found that the colocalization level of FITC-TNF-α and TNFR1 in the FITC-TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) group was significantly lower than that in the FITC-TNF-α group (Figure 2(e), P<0.01). In contrast with the FITC-TNF-α + ENCP group, the colocalization level of FITC-TNF-α and TNFR1 in the FITC-TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) + ENCP group was slighted suppressed, although failed to achieve any significant difference (Figure 2(e), P>0.05). All in all, the above results showed that HSYA inhibits the proliferation and inflammatory level of MRC-5 cells induced by TNF-α by competing with TNF-α to bind with TNFR1. After TNFR1 antagonist was added, HSYA was not able to inhibit cell proliferation and inflammatory response of MRC-5 cells induced by TNF-α.Figure 2
HSYA competes with TNF-α to bind with TNFR1. (a) MTT assay was used to detect the proliferation of TNF-α stimulated MRC-5 cells; (b) quantitative RT-PCR was used to detect mRNA expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1; (c-d), western blot was used to detect the protein expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1; (e) immunofluorescence was used to detect the colocalization of TNF-α and TNFR1; HSYA, hydroxysafflor yellow A; ∗P<0.05; ∗∗P<0.01.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)


### 3.3. HSYA Inhibits the Binding of TNFR1 and TAK1-TAB2 Complex in TNF-α Stimulated MRC-5 Cells

To investigate whether HSYA competes with TNF-α to bind with TNFR1 and also inhibits the binding of TNFR1 with TAK1-TAB2 complex, Co-IP was performed to detect the expressions of TAK1 and TAB2 in TNFR1 complexes. Co-IP was carried out using TNFR1 antibody, and TAK1 or TAB2 antibodies used for western blot. The results manifested that, compared with the TNF-α group, TAK1 and TAB2 signals were undetectable in the HSYA (45 μmol/L) group. The protein expressions of TAK1 and TAB2 in the TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) group were clearly decreased. Meanwhile, corresponding protein bands of TNFR1, TAK1, and TAB2 were detected in total cell lysis (Figure 3, P<0.01), which indicated that HSYA can significantly inhibit the binding of TNFR1 and TAK1-TAB2 complexes, thus affecting TNF-α induced proliferation and inflammation response in MRC-5 cells.Figure 3
HSYA inhibits the binding of TNFR1 and TAK1-TAB2 complexes in TNF-α induced MRC-5 cells. Note: western blot results manifested that TNFR1 can bind with TAK1 and TAB2 proteins; HSYA, hydroxysafflor yellow A; ∗P<0.05; ∗∗∗P<0.01.


### 3.4. HSYA Inhibits TNF-α Induced Proliferation and Inflammatory Response in MRC-5 Cells via NF-κB/AP-1 Signaling Pathway

We then sought to determine whether HSYA affects TNF-α induced proliferation and inflammatory response in MRC-5 cells via the NF-κB signaling pathway. Those findings revealed that, compared with the TNF-α group, the levels of IKK and p65 phosphorylation in TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) group were clearly decreased, while the protein levels of IκBα were markedly increased, indicating that HSYA can inhibit the activation of the NF-κB signal pathway (Figures 4(a)–4(d), P<0.01).Figure 4
HSYA inhibits TNF-α induced proliferation and inflammatory response in MRC-5 cells via the NF-κB/AP-1 signaling pathway. (a) Western blot was used to detect the level of IKK and p65 phosphorylation and protein expression level of IκBα; (b–d) quantitative evaluation on phosphorylated levels of IKK, p65, and IκBα protein expressions; (e) luciferase reporter assay was used to detect the fluorescent activity of TGF-β1-TA. Chromatin immunoprecipitation was used to detect the binding effect of AP-1 and TGF-β1-TA using anti-AP-1 as antibody in immunoprecipitation; (f) the expression of TGF-β1-TA was detected by PCR; (g) TGF-β1-TA band was detected by agarose gel electrophoresis; HSYA, hydroxysafflor yellow A; ns, P>0.05; ∗P<0.05; ∗∗∗P<0.01.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)Subsequently, luciferase reporter assay was used to detect whether HSYA can inhibit the binding of TGF-β1 promoter and AP-1. TGF-β1 promoter-TA-luc plasmid (TGF-β1-TA) plasmid was constructed, and the experimental results showed that the fluorescence signal intensity in the TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) group was significantly enhanced (Figure 4(e), P<0.01) compared with the TNF-α group. Meanwhile, the binding of AP-1 protein and TGF-β1 promoter was inspected by chromatin immunocoprecipitation and the content of TGF-β1 promoter by quantitative RT-PCR. The experiment clearly indicated that the expression of TGF-β1-TA was not detected in the group supplemented with IgG antibody. The content of TGF-β1-TA was higher in the group with AP-1 antibody and the group with c-jun antibody (Figure 4(f), P<0.01). The expression of TGF-β1-TA in the TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) group was clearly decreased compared with the TNF-α group (Figure 4(f), P<0.01). The results were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis experiment (Figure 4(g)), indicating that HSYA can inhibit the binding of TGF-β1 promoter to AP-1, thus inhibiting the expression of TGF-β1. Taken together, these results indicate that HSYA affects TNF-α-induced biological processes in MRC-5 cells by inhibiting the activation of the NF-κB/AP-1 signaling pathway.


## 3.1. HSYA Inhibits TNF-α Induced Proliferation and Inflammation in MRC-5 Cells

MRC-5 cells were stimulated by TNF-α at concentrations of 0, 2.5, 5, 7.,5 and 10 ng/mL. After 48 h, the effects of different concentrations of TNF-α on the proliferation of MRC-5 cells were determined. The results showed that the 5 ng/mL TNF-α treatment could markedly promote the proliferation of MRC-5 cells (Figure 1(a), P<0.01), as well as increasing the mRNA and the expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 (Figures 1(b) and 1(c), P<0.01), compared with 0 ng/mL TNF-α treatment. The 2.5 and 7.5 ng/mL TNF-α could slightly promote MRC-5 cell proliferation, while 10 ng/mL TNF-α treatment could not promote the proliferation of MRC-5 cells (all P>0.05). As shown in Figure 1(a), 7.5 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL TNF-α treatment could markedly promote mRNA and protein expression levels of inflammatory factors IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 (Figures 1(b) and 1(c), P<0.01). Taken together, 5 ng/mL TNF-α was used for subsequent experiments.Next, this paper explored the effect of HSYA on TNF-α induced proliferation and inflammatory response of lung FB. The analysis result of HSYA by high-pressure liquid chromatography is presented in Figure 1(d), and its purity is 95.34%. MRC-5 cells were treated with different concentrations of HSYA. Results after 48 h treatment showed that compared with cells without HSYA treatment, there was no obvious difference in cell proliferation (Figure 1(e), P>0.05) as well as the mRNA and protein expression levels of inflammatory factors IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 in cells subjected to 5, 15, and 45 μmol/L HSYA treatment (Figures 1(f) and 1(g), P>0.05), which proved that HSYA had no toxic or side effects on normal cells. Compared with the TNF-α group, the TNF-α + HSYA (5 μmol/L) group has no obvious effect on cell proliferation, while the TNF-α + HSYA (15 μmol/L) group and TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) group can significantly inhibit cell proliferation (Figure 1(h), P<0.01), indicating that HSYA could suppress TNF-α induced proliferation of MRC-5 cells in a dose-dependent manner.Quantitative RT-PCR and western blot experiments showed that compared with the TNF-α group, the mRNA and protein expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 in the TNF-α + HSYA (5 μmol/L) group had no distinct difference, while the mRNA and protein expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 in the TNF-α + HSYA(15 μmol/L) group and TNF-α + HSYA(45 μmol/L) group were significantly reduced (Figures 1(i) and 1(j), P<0.01). These results indicate that HSYA can inhibit TNF-α induced proliferation and inflammatory response in MRC-5 cells.


## 3.2. HSYA Competes with TNF-α to Bind with TNFR1

Next, in this step, we surmise that HSYA regulates TNF-α stimulated MRC-5 cells proliferation and expression of inflammatory factors by competing with TNF-α to bind with its receptor TNFR1. The experimental results showed that, compared with the TNF-α + ENCP group, no obvious difference on OD value and mRNA and protein expression levels of inflammatory factors IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1 in the TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) + ENCP group was found (Figures 2(a)–2(d)). Comprehensive previous studies showed that HSYA can inhibit TNF-α stimulated proliferation and inflammatory response of MRC-5 cells, while TNFR1 antagonist ENCP could hamper the inhibitory effect of HSYA on TNF-α induced cell proliferation and inflammatory response. We further performed immunofluorescence experiments and found that the colocalization level of FITC-TNF-α and TNFR1 in the FITC-TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) group was significantly lower than that in the FITC-TNF-α group (Figure 2(e), P<0.01). In contrast with the FITC-TNF-α + ENCP group, the colocalization level of FITC-TNF-α and TNFR1 in the FITC-TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) + ENCP group was slighted suppressed, although failed to achieve any significant difference (Figure 2(e), P>0.05). All in all, the above results showed that HSYA inhibits the proliferation and inflammatory level of MRC-5 cells induced by TNF-α by competing with TNF-α to bind with TNFR1. After TNFR1 antagonist was added, HSYA was not able to inhibit cell proliferation and inflammatory response of MRC-5 cells induced by TNF-α.Figure 2
HSYA competes with TNF-α to bind with TNFR1. (a) MTT assay was used to detect the proliferation of TNF-α stimulated MRC-5 cells; (b) quantitative RT-PCR was used to detect mRNA expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1; (c-d), western blot was used to detect the protein expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1; (e) immunofluorescence was used to detect the colocalization of TNF-α and TNFR1; HSYA, hydroxysafflor yellow A; ∗P<0.05; ∗∗P<0.01.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)


## 3.3. HSYA Inhibits the Binding of TNFR1 and TAK1-TAB2 Complex in TNF-α Stimulated MRC-5 Cells

To investigate whether HSYA competes with TNF-α to bind with TNFR1 and also inhibits the binding of TNFR1 with TAK1-TAB2 complex, Co-IP was performed to detect the expressions of TAK1 and TAB2 in TNFR1 complexes. Co-IP was carried out using TNFR1 antibody, and TAK1 or TAB2 antibodies used for western blot. The results manifested that, compared with the TNF-α group, TAK1 and TAB2 signals were undetectable in the HSYA (45 μmol/L) group. The protein expressions of TAK1 and TAB2 in the TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) group were clearly decreased. Meanwhile, corresponding protein bands of TNFR1, TAK1, and TAB2 were detected in total cell lysis (Figure 3, P<0.01), which indicated that HSYA can significantly inhibit the binding of TNFR1 and TAK1-TAB2 complexes, thus affecting TNF-α induced proliferation and inflammation response in MRC-5 cells.Figure 3
HSYA inhibits the binding of TNFR1 and TAK1-TAB2 complexes in TNF-α induced MRC-5 cells. Note: western blot results manifested that TNFR1 can bind with TAK1 and TAB2 proteins; HSYA, hydroxysafflor yellow A; ∗P<0.05; ∗∗∗P<0.01.


## 3.4. HSYA Inhibits TNF-α Induced Proliferation and Inflammatory Response in MRC-5 Cells via NF-κB/AP-1 Signaling Pathway

We then sought to determine whether HSYA affects TNF-α induced proliferation and inflammatory response in MRC-5 cells via the NF-κB signaling pathway. Those findings revealed that, compared with the TNF-α group, the levels of IKK and p65 phosphorylation in TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) group were clearly decreased, while the protein levels of IκBα were markedly increased, indicating that HSYA can inhibit the activation of the NF-κB signal pathway (Figures 4(a)–4(d), P<0.01).Figure 4
HSYA inhibits TNF-α induced proliferation and inflammatory response in MRC-5 cells via the NF-κB/AP-1 signaling pathway. (a) Western blot was used to detect the level of IKK and p65 phosphorylation and protein expression level of IκBα; (b–d) quantitative evaluation on phosphorylated levels of IKK, p65, and IκBα protein expressions; (e) luciferase reporter assay was used to detect the fluorescent activity of TGF-β1-TA. Chromatin immunoprecipitation was used to detect the binding effect of AP-1 and TGF-β1-TA using anti-AP-1 as antibody in immunoprecipitation; (f) the expression of TGF-β1-TA was detected by PCR; (g) TGF-β1-TA band was detected by agarose gel electrophoresis; HSYA, hydroxysafflor yellow A; ns, P>0.05; ∗P<0.05; ∗∗∗P<0.01.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)Subsequently, luciferase reporter assay was used to detect whether HSYA can inhibit the binding of TGF-β1 promoter and AP-1. TGF-β1 promoter-TA-luc plasmid (TGF-β1-TA) plasmid was constructed, and the experimental results showed that the fluorescence signal intensity in the TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) group was significantly enhanced (Figure 4(e), P<0.01) compared with the TNF-α group. Meanwhile, the binding of AP-1 protein and TGF-β1 promoter was inspected by chromatin immunocoprecipitation and the content of TGF-β1 promoter by quantitative RT-PCR. The experiment clearly indicated that the expression of TGF-β1-TA was not detected in the group supplemented with IgG antibody. The content of TGF-β1-TA was higher in the group with AP-1 antibody and the group with c-jun antibody (Figure 4(f), P<0.01). The expression of TGF-β1-TA in the TNF-α + HSYA (45 μmol/L) group was clearly decreased compared with the TNF-α group (Figure 4(f), P<0.01). The results were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis experiment (Figure 4(g)), indicating that HSYA can inhibit the binding of TGF-β1 promoter to AP-1, thus inhibiting the expression of TGF-β1. Taken together, these results indicate that HSYA affects TNF-α-induced biological processes in MRC-5 cells by inhibiting the activation of the NF-κB/AP-1 signaling pathway.


## 4. Discussion

Lung FB, derived from mesenchymal cells, is the main effector cell and plays a critical way in the progression of IPF [15]. In this research, we explored how HSYA affects TNF-α induced inflammatory response and cell proliferation of MRC-5 cells. Collectively, our study showed that HSYA can modulate the NF-κB/AP-1 signaling pathway to inhibit TNF-α induced inflammation and cell proliferation of FB.Experiments in this thesis indicated that HSYA could distinctly attenuate TNF-α induced inflammatory response and proliferation of FB. Initially, we used different concentrations of TNF-α to stimulate MRC-5 cells and 5 ng/mL TNF-α was selected for the subsequently experiments. Then, we identified that HSYA could hamper TNF-α induced cell proliferation and inflammatory response in a dose-dependent manner. Further, RT-PCR and western blot detected HSYA in treatment with 45 μmol/L could distinctly result in the decrease of mRNA and protein levels of IL-6, IL-1β, and TGF-β1, implying for the suppression effect of HSYA on cell inflammation. Previous findings concluded that TNF-α, as proinflammatory cytokine, is a major player in initiation and amplification of inflammatory responses [18], and it has been related to a variety of pulmonary inflammatory diseases including acute lung injury, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sarcoidosis, and IPF [19]. In our study, we used TNF-α to induce inflammatory reaction in FB and to detect the effect of HSYA on cell inflammation and proliferation. Then, evidence has testified that the addition of TNFR1 antagonist ENCP could block the treatment of HSYA on TNF-α-induced cell proliferation and inflammatory response, and therefore, we came to a conclusion that HSYA could compete with TNF-α to bind with TNF-α receptor TNFR1, thus regulating TNF-α induced cell proliferation and inflammatory response. Further mechanism investigations indicated that HSYA hampers the binding of TNFR1 to TAK1-TAB2 complex, thereby affecting TNF-α induced the proliferation and inflammatory response of FB. Although these results were solid evidence to support the inhibitory effect of HSYA on TNF-α induced inflammation and cell proliferation of FB, the specific mechanism, however, is far from illustrated.TGF-β1 is deemed as the major profibrotic cytokine, and numerous studies have confirmed its critical role in the treatment of fibrotic diseases [20]. Transcription of TGF-β1 gene is dependent on transcription factor activator protein-1 (AP-1), and the study has confirmed that TNF-α promotes the expression of TGF-β1 in FB by activating AP-1 [21, 22]. TGF-β1 gene promoter contains two AP-1 binding sites [23], and any mutation on the binding sites or the specific inhibitor of AP-1, curcumin, can block the expression of TGF-β1 gene. In our study, we confirmed that HSYA inhibits the binding of TGF-β1 promoter to AP-1, thereby suppressing the expression of TGF-β1, indicating HSYA could block AP-1 pathway. Consistent with the results of our study, HSYA was proved to suppress TGF-β1 expression and thus attenuates airway remodeling in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [17].Also, previous findings elucidate that TNF-α, binding to TNFR1, can facilitate multiple signal transduction pathways, including mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases and NF-κB pathways [24]. Next, we explored whether HSYA’s inhibition of inflammatory response is related to inhibition of the NF-κB pathway. Studies have shown that, in the process of lung fibrosis, NF-κB can mediate pulmonary fibrosis and alveolar inflammation by promoting gene transcription of cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-8, IL-1β, and TGF-β1 [25, 26]. In addition, HSYA pharmacologic effects of anti-inflammatory and antioxidative on neuronal protection study proved the function of HSYA inhibiting NF-κB activation [27]. Detection on the NF-κB signal pathway related proteins showed that HSYA can inhibit the activation of NF-κB pathway and suppress the expressions of IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β1. Therefore, HSYA suppress TNF-α induced inflammatory response of FB by inhibiting the activation of NF-κB pathway. In our research, we have found that HSYA could block the binding of TGF-β1 promoter with AP-1, thus inhibiting the expression of TGF-β1. Taking together, HSYA affects TNF-α-induced inflammatory and proliferation of MRC-5 cells via blocking the activation of the NF-κB/AP-1 signaling pathway.To sum up, experiments of this study revealed that HSYA may be used for a therapeutic agent for IPF treatment based on the finding that HSYA suppresses TNF-α induced proliferation and inflammatory response of FB through inhibiting the NF-κB/AP-1 signaling pathway. However, further investigation is necessary to reveal these results and expound the precise mechanisms whereby HSYA suppresses the downstream signal transduction pathway.



---

*Source: 4050327-2019-12-26.xml*