# Pyrolysis of Tall Oil-Derived Fatty and Resin Acid Mixtures

Authors: Hanna Lappi; Raimo Alén
Journal: ISRN Renewable Energy
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Neutralised mixtures of tall oil-derived fatty acids and resin acids were separately pyrolysed (at 750∘C for 20 s) by pyrolysis gas chromatography with mass-selective and flame ionisation detection (Py-GC/MSD/FID) to clarify their thermochemical behaviour. The pyrolysate of fatty acid salts characteristically contained high amounts of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons and minor amounts of monoaromatics, whereas the pyrolysis of resin acid salts mainly resulted in the formation of aromatics with up to three benzene rings and only in very low amounts of aliphatic hydrocarbons. The data obtained are useful when considering the suitability of various tall oil products containing fatty and resin acid fractions for the production of biofuels and chemicals via pyrolysis.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Both fatty acid and resin acid (i.e., tricyclic diterpenoids) components occur in the initial oleoresin fraction of coniferous wood species [1]. In the kraft pulping industry, tall oil soap, containing mainly the sodium salts of these acids, is removed by skimming from the spent cooking liquor “black liquor” during its evaporation before combustion in a recovery furnace to produce energy and recover the inorganic cooking chemicals [2]. Traditionally, the fatty and resin acids are liberated by adding sulphuric acid to yield crude tall oil (CTO, the average yield is in the range of 30 to 50 kg ton−1 of pulp), which is then purified and fractionated by vacuum distillation. The main fractions and their mass proportions are light oil (10% to 15%), fatty acids (20% to 40%), rosin (25% to 35%), and pitch residue (20% to 30%).Various commercial fatty acid products from tall oil (TOFA) are available [3]. In general, monoenoic oleic (C18:1) and dienoic linoleic (C18:2) acids are common in most TOFA products, although during kraft pulping, the original dienoic and trienoic fatty acids with cis configuration are partly isomerised to acids with conjugated double bonds with mainly cis-trans configuration [4]. On the other hand, during kraft pulping as well as during the acidulation of tall oil soap, a general shift of fatty acid composition towards a lower degree of unsaturation has been reported [5]. The predominating resin acids in commercial tall oil rosin (TOR) are the abietane- and pimarane-type diterpenoids (Figure 1). The principal change in this fraction occurring during kraft pulping is the partial conversion of levopimaric acid into abietic acid. Furthermore, during tall oil distillation, some double-bond isomerisation of both abietane- and pimarane-type acids, disproportionation of abietadienoic acids, and dehydrogenation of abietadienoic and dehydroabietic acids take place [6]. However, the dominant reactions responsible for the losses of original resin acids include decarboxylation together with the dehydration and polymerisation of all acid types.Figure 1
Chemical structures of the most common resin acids [7].During the last two decades, various common vegetable oils have aroused considerable interest as potential sources of biofuels [8–10]. The governing idea has been to produce pyrolytically hydrocarbon-rich mixtures resembling petroleum. In our earlier investigations, the thermochemical behaviour of common fatty acid (C18, C18:1, and C18:2) sodium salts [11], vegetable oil (palm, olive, rapeseed and castor oils) soaps [12], and CTO soap [13] was clarified under pyrolytic conditions.Other commercial processes for conversion of vegetable oils into liquid fuels include, for example, transesterification and hydroprocessing to produce, respectively, fatty acid esters and linear hydrocarbons [14–16]. However, one of the main drawbacks of hydroprocessing is that it must be conducted under high pressure. In addition, conventional hydroprocesses are usually quite expensive (large reactors and compressors, costs for recycle of both feed and hydrogen, as well as cost to shut down and to replace and/or regenerate deactivated catalyst) [17]. Additional inefficiencies are due to recycle of feed because of low conversions as well as to impurities containing sulphur, nitrogen, metals, and aromatics.Commonly practiced transesterification has some drawbacks including the requirement of a large amount of alcohol, typically methanol, which is usually derived from natural gas or other fossil fuel sources [14, 18]. The formation of a low value by-product in the form of glycerol is also a problem, at least until there are enough facilities for its refining. Additionally, the heating values are lower than those of conventional diesel fuels.The analysis performed by U.S. Department of Energy [19] concludes that the production of hydrocarbon motor fuels from biomass via the pyrolysis route is economically attractive. The cost becomes even more favourable if the facility can be closely associated with an existing petroleum refinery. Fast pyrolysis is a simple, efficient (high thermal efficiency), low fossil fuel input, and inexpensive technology [20, 21]. The by-products of char and gas can be used within the process to provide process heat requirements [22]. In this way, there are no waste streams other than from flue gas and ash.The main objective of this study was to obtain more detailed data on the thermochemical reactions taking place during the pyrolysis of the main components in tall oil-derived products. For this purpose, neutralised fractions of TOFA and TOR were selected. Our tentative findings [13] indicated that due to the remarkable formation of complicated aromatics, resin acids would have, for example, a negative effect on the quality of the product during production of diesel-type biofuels. This study was based on earlier findings [11] that, when pyrolysing soaps (i.e., as sodium salts of acids) instead of using free acids as feedstocks, pyrolysis can be controlled more readily. This also means that, for example, in the case of tall oil-based feedstocks, pyrolysis can be applied directly to tall oil soap and no external sulphuric acid is needed for acidulation.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Chemicals and Tall Oil Samples

The compounds used as internal standards in the gas chromatographic (GC) analysis of the extractives were heneicosanoic acid (99%, Sigma) and betulinol (≥98%, Sigma). The external standard used in the quantitative pyrolysis experiments was adamantane (>99%, Fluka) in benzene (>99%, Fluka). Solvents used in the sample preparation of the extractives were analytical grade acetone (BDH), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) (Lab-Scan), and analytical grade pyridine (BDH). The silylation reagents bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) and trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) were from Regis Technologies.The chemicals used in the determination of saponification values were potassium hydroxide (≥85%, Riedel de Haën), sodium hydroxide (≥99%, Fluka), hydrochloric acid (≥37%, Riedel de Haën), denatured alcohol BA (99.5 w-%, Altia), and phenolphthalein (Merck). Water was obtained from a Millipore Milli-Q water system.TOFA containing about 1.4% unsaponifiables and TOR containing about 3.5% unsaponifiables were the products of Forchem Oy.


### 2.2. Analysis of Tall Oil Acid Mixtures

For the analysis of extractive constituents, the samples were diluted in acetone (0.5 mg mL−1) and derivatised for GC with a mixture of BSTFA and TMCS (99 : 1, resp.). Derivatisation of samples was performed by keeping them at 70°C for one hour. Quantitative analysis of the individual compounds was carried out on an Agilent 6850 Series GC System with an Equity-5 (30 m × 0.32 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm) column. The injector temperature was 290°C and the detector temperature was 300°C. The GC oven temperature programme was 1.5 min at 100°C, followed by an increase of 6°C min−1 to 180°C, 10 min at 180°C, an increase of 4°C min−1 to 290°C, and 20 min at 290°C. Qualitative analysis of the individual components was performed with an Agilent 6890 Series GC System equipped with a 7683 injector and an Agilent 5973 mass selective detector (MSD). The capillary column used was an HP-5MS (30 m × 0.32 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm) and the GC oven temperature programme was the same as that used in the quantitative analyses.Saponification values for the acid mixtures were determined according to the TAPPI standard T621 cm-01.


### 2.3. Pyrolysis Experiments

TOFA and TOR were both saponified with sodium hydroxide (the amount was 1.5 times the equivalent amount) prior to pyrolysis. Soap samples were pyrolysed in quartz tubes at a heating rate of 1000°C s−1 using a CDS Pyroprobe 1000 heated-filament pyrolyser coupled to an HP 5890 II gas chromatograph (Py-GC). The column was a ZB-5HT capillary GC column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm). Detection was carried out with either an HP 5972 mass selective detector (MSD, qualitative analyses) or an HP 5890 GC/flame ionisation detection (FID quantitative analyses). The sample size for qualitative analysis was about 3 mg and for quantitative analysis about 1 mg. The Py-GC interface temperature was 250°C and the injector temperature 280°C. Pyrolysis parameters were chosen according to the results of previous research [12, 13]. In each experiment, the pyrolysis temperature was 750°C and the temperature was kept constant for 20 s. The GC oven temperature was 5 min at 35°C, an increase of 5°C min−1 to 125°C, 3°C min−1 to 285°C, 5°C min−1 to 380°C, and finally 5 min at 360°C. Helium was used as the carrier gas and as an inert atmosphere in the pyrolysis interface. The carrier gas flow rate was kept at 1 mL min−1 during the gas chromatographic analysis.Due to the multiplicity of pyrolysis products, the identification of all constituents in pyrolysates appeared to be impossible only by the retention time with respect to some internal standards. For this reason, a proper interpretation of the mass spectra of the pyrolysis products was based on a commercial database, Wiley 7n, together with the recognition of fragmentation patterns as well as our earlier results [11–13]. Only quality matches of above 85% were included.The calibration curve for quantitative determination of the pyrolysis products was determined by the pyrolysis of adamantane dissolved in benzene. The calibration was performed using a similar method to that used by Bocchini et al. [23] when adding the internal standard for pyrolysis. Solutions of adamantane in the 40 to 110 μg mL−1 range were carefully added to a quartz capillary tube, which was immediately inserted into the Py-GC interface. After an equilibration period of 30 s, pyrolysis was performed. Six different concentrations were pyrolysed using the same parameters as for the samples. Two replicates were made for each concentration. The correlation coefficient (R2) of the calibration curve obtained was 0.990. Due to the multitude of peaks in the vegetable oil pyrolysates, adamantane was only used as an external standard. This quantification was used to calculate the product yields.


## 2.1. Chemicals and Tall Oil Samples

The compounds used as internal standards in the gas chromatographic (GC) analysis of the extractives were heneicosanoic acid (99%, Sigma) and betulinol (≥98%, Sigma). The external standard used in the quantitative pyrolysis experiments was adamantane (>99%, Fluka) in benzene (>99%, Fluka). Solvents used in the sample preparation of the extractives were analytical grade acetone (BDH), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) (Lab-Scan), and analytical grade pyridine (BDH). The silylation reagents bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) and trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) were from Regis Technologies.The chemicals used in the determination of saponification values were potassium hydroxide (≥85%, Riedel de Haën), sodium hydroxide (≥99%, Fluka), hydrochloric acid (≥37%, Riedel de Haën), denatured alcohol BA (99.5 w-%, Altia), and phenolphthalein (Merck). Water was obtained from a Millipore Milli-Q water system.TOFA containing about 1.4% unsaponifiables and TOR containing about 3.5% unsaponifiables were the products of Forchem Oy.


## 2.2. Analysis of Tall Oil Acid Mixtures

For the analysis of extractive constituents, the samples were diluted in acetone (0.5 mg mL−1) and derivatised for GC with a mixture of BSTFA and TMCS (99 : 1, resp.). Derivatisation of samples was performed by keeping them at 70°C for one hour. Quantitative analysis of the individual compounds was carried out on an Agilent 6850 Series GC System with an Equity-5 (30 m × 0.32 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm) column. The injector temperature was 290°C and the detector temperature was 300°C. The GC oven temperature programme was 1.5 min at 100°C, followed by an increase of 6°C min−1 to 180°C, 10 min at 180°C, an increase of 4°C min−1 to 290°C, and 20 min at 290°C. Qualitative analysis of the individual components was performed with an Agilent 6890 Series GC System equipped with a 7683 injector and an Agilent 5973 mass selective detector (MSD). The capillary column used was an HP-5MS (30 m × 0.32 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm) and the GC oven temperature programme was the same as that used in the quantitative analyses.Saponification values for the acid mixtures were determined according to the TAPPI standard T621 cm-01.


## 2.3. Pyrolysis Experiments

TOFA and TOR were both saponified with sodium hydroxide (the amount was 1.5 times the equivalent amount) prior to pyrolysis. Soap samples were pyrolysed in quartz tubes at a heating rate of 1000°C s−1 using a CDS Pyroprobe 1000 heated-filament pyrolyser coupled to an HP 5890 II gas chromatograph (Py-GC). The column was a ZB-5HT capillary GC column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm). Detection was carried out with either an HP 5972 mass selective detector (MSD, qualitative analyses) or an HP 5890 GC/flame ionisation detection (FID quantitative analyses). The sample size for qualitative analysis was about 3 mg and for quantitative analysis about 1 mg. The Py-GC interface temperature was 250°C and the injector temperature 280°C. Pyrolysis parameters were chosen according to the results of previous research [12, 13]. In each experiment, the pyrolysis temperature was 750°C and the temperature was kept constant for 20 s. The GC oven temperature was 5 min at 35°C, an increase of 5°C min−1 to 125°C, 3°C min−1 to 285°C, 5°C min−1 to 380°C, and finally 5 min at 360°C. Helium was used as the carrier gas and as an inert atmosphere in the pyrolysis interface. The carrier gas flow rate was kept at 1 mL min−1 during the gas chromatographic analysis.Due to the multiplicity of pyrolysis products, the identification of all constituents in pyrolysates appeared to be impossible only by the retention time with respect to some internal standards. For this reason, a proper interpretation of the mass spectra of the pyrolysis products was based on a commercial database, Wiley 7n, together with the recognition of fragmentation patterns as well as our earlier results [11–13]. Only quality matches of above 85% were included.The calibration curve for quantitative determination of the pyrolysis products was determined by the pyrolysis of adamantane dissolved in benzene. The calibration was performed using a similar method to that used by Bocchini et al. [23] when adding the internal standard for pyrolysis. Solutions of adamantane in the 40 to 110 μg mL−1 range were carefully added to a quartz capillary tube, which was immediately inserted into the Py-GC interface. After an equilibration period of 30 s, pyrolysis was performed. Six different concentrations were pyrolysed using the same parameters as for the samples. Two replicates were made for each concentration. The correlation coefficient (R2) of the calibration curve obtained was 0.990. Due to the multitude of peaks in the vegetable oil pyrolysates, adamantane was only used as an external standard. This quantification was used to calculate the product yields.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Raw Materials

The total amounts of fatty acids and resin acids detected in TOFA were about 94% and 3%, respectively. Values were slightly different from those given by the manufacturer (97% and 1.7%, resp.), which was probably due to our inaccurate compound quantification (i.e., in all cases, the response factors used between the GC peak areas derived from the internal standards and compounds were equal to 1) and a fact that not all peaks (the amount of unidentified peaks was about 3%, Table1) could be identified. Due to double-bond rearrangements, four different isomers of conjugated C18:2 acids were found. The main fatty acid components were unsaturated linoleic (C18:2), oleic (C18:1), and linolenic (C18:3) acids.Table 1
Composition of total extractives (% of the total).
TOFA
TOR
Formula
Fatty acids
Palmitic acid
0.1
*
C16H32O2
Margaric acid
0.1
C17H34O2
17:0 anteiso
0.1
C17H34O2
Linolenic acid
8.5
C18H30O2
Linoleic acid
48.1
C18H32O2
Oleic acid
24.6
C18H34O2
Stearic acid
3.5
*
C18H36O2
18:2 (conjugated)
0.8
C18H32O2
18:2 (conjugated)
1.8
C18H32O2
18:2 (conjugated)
2.4
C18H32O2
18:3 (conjugated)
0.9
C18H30O2
10-Nonadecenoic acid
1.1
C19H36O2
Nonadecanoic acid
0.2
C19H38O2
Eicosatrienoic acid
1.2
C20H34O2
Eicosadienoic acid
0.2
C20H36O2
Eicosenoic acid
0.2
C20H38O2
Arachidic acid
0.2
0.4
C20H40O2
Behenic acid
2.2
C22H44O2
Lignoseric acid
0.5
C24H48O2
∑
94.0
3.1
Resin acids
Secohydroabietic acid
*
C20H30O2
8,15-Isopimaridien-18-oic acid
*
1.3
C20H30O2
8,15-Pimaradien-18-oic acid
1.8
1.1
C20H30O2
Pimaric acid
1.0
3.3
C20H30O2
Sandaracopimaric acid
0.1
1.2
C20H30O2
Isopimaric acid
0.1
4.3
C20H30O2
Palustric acid
10.6
C20H30O2
Dihydroabietic acid
0.5
C20H32O2
Levopimaric acid
0.3
C20H30O2
Dehydroabietic acid
21.4
C20H28O2
Abietic acid
36.2
C20H30O2
Abietatetraenoic acid
1.0
C21H28O2
Neoabietic acid
1.7
C20H30O2
Isodehydroabietic acid
*
C20H30O2
Hydroxydehydroabietic acid
1.2
C20H28O3
Unidentified hydroxy resin acid
1.4
C20H30O3
Dihydroxydehydroabietic acid
0.3
C20H28O4
Hydroxy-7-oxodehydroabietic acid
0.4
C20H26O4
∑
3.0
86.2
Unknown
3.0
10.7
T
*races of the compound detected in qualitative analysis, not enough for the quantification.
Abbreviations: TOFA: neutralised tall oil fatty acid mixture and TOR: neutralised tall oil resin acid mixture.The composition of resin acids in TOR differed significantly from that in CTO, indicating various decomposition and isomerisation reactions during distillation [24]. For this reason, the amount of unidentified peaks (mainly various resin acid derivatives) was also relatively high (about 10% of the total peak areas, Table 1). The total amounts of fatty acids and resin acids detected in TOR were about 3% and 86%, respectively. These values differed from those given by the manufacturer (92% and 3.5%), probably because of the limitation of the analysis method mentioned above. The main resin acid components were abietane-type acids, abietic, dehydroabietic, and palustric acids.


### 3.2. Pyrolysis of Soap Mixtures

All the pyrolysates contained significant amounts of highly volatile products marked as “C3–C5 compounds” in Figure 2, primarily corresponding to both alkenes and alkanes. However, due to the low resolution of these numerous low-molecular-mass compounds, their proper identification was not possible with the apparatus used.Figure 2
Percentage of the TIC peak areas of various pyrolysis products groups and the standard deviation of the results.The pyrolysis of neutralised TOFA resulted in a high amount of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons (Figures2 and 3, Table 2), although some aromatics with one benzene ring were also formed (Figure 2, Table 3). The most prominent fractions were alkenes (C6–C12) and alkadienes (C11, C12 and C17) together with benzene and methylbenzene. The alkadienes can be considered representatives of the typical reaction products derived, for example, from oleic acid (C18:1). Due to the lower dissociation energies of allyl bonds, the presence of the double bond in the alkyl chain favours the homolytic C–C cleavage at the allyl position rather than the homolytic C–C cleavage adjacent to the carboxylic group [25]. For this reason, a relatively significant amount of 1-undecene was formed from oleic acid. The additional double bonds in the alkyl chain (cf., linoleic (C18:2) and linolenic (C18:3) acids) favoured cyclisation and aromatisation, thus explaining a considerable amount (about 13% of the total compounds, Figures 2 and 3) of aromatics detected in the TOFA pyrolysate. The amount of various unidentified compounds was about 29% of the total compounds.Table 2
Classificationa of aliphatic pyrolysis products (including their formula) from the tall oil studies.
n
-Alk-1-enes and other alkenes
1-Hexene
C6H12
1-Heptene
C7H14
1-Octene and other octenesb
C8H16
1-Noneneband other nonenesb
C9H18
1-Deceneband other decenesb
C10H20
1-Undecene and other undecenesb
C11H22
1-Dodecene and other dodecenesb
C12H24
1-Trideceneband other tridecenesb
C13H26
1-Tetradeceneb and other tetradecenesb
C14H28
1-Pentadeceneb
C15H30
1-Hexadeceneb
C16H32
1-Heptadeceneb
C17H34
Alkanes
Heptane
C7H16
Octane
C8H18
Nonaneb
C9H20
Decaneb
C10H22
Undecane
C11H24
Dodecaneb
C12H26
Tridecane
C13H28
Tetradecaneb
C14H30
Pentadecaneb
C15H32
Dienes
2-Methyl-2,3-hexadiene
C7H12
2,5-Dimethyl-2,4-hexadienec
C8H14
1,3-Octadieneb
C8H14
1,3-Nonadieneb
C9H16
1,4-Undecadieneband 2,4-undecadieneb
C11H20
2,4-Dodecadieneb
C12H22
1,9-Tetradecadieneb
C14H26
1,15-Hexadecadieneb
C16H30
6,8-Heptadecadieneb
C17H32
Cycloalkanes
Butylcyclopentaneb
C9H18
Nonylcyclopentaneb
C14H28
Nonylcyclohexaneb
C15H30
Cycloalkenes
Methylcyclopentadienec
C6H8
1-Methyl-1,4-cyclohexadiene
C7H10
3-Ethenylcyclopenteneb
C7H10
5,6-Dimethyl-1,3-cyclohexadienec and
C8H12
1,5-dimethyl-1,4-cyclohexadienec
1,3,8-p-Menthatriene
C10H14
1,4-Dimethyldihydroazulenec
C12H14
Terpenes and terpenoids
α-Terpinenec
C10H16
Δ3-Carenec
C10H16
Limonenec
C10H16
Chamazulenec
C14H16
1,4-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethyl)azulenec
C15H18
Stigmastan-3,5-dienc
C29H48
Terpenes and terpenoids containing oxygen
Borneolc
C10H18O
1-Methyloestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-18-nor-17-ketonec
C18H22O
Ketones
2-Dodecanoneb
C12H24O
2-Nonadecanoneb
C19H38O
Other Oxygen containing compounds
10,12-Hexadecadienalb
C16H28O
9,12,15-Octadecatrien-1-olb
C18H32O
Others
1,4-Bis(methylene)cyclohexanec
C8H12
5-Dodecen-7-yneb
C12H20
1-(2′-Methyl-1′-propenyl)-7-(1′-propynyl)-  tricyclohexanec
C8H12
1-Hexadecyneb
C16H30
Hexaethylidenecyclohexanec
C18H24
10-Demethylsqualenec
C19H48
C
aompounds are listed within each substance group according to their GC retention times.
O
bnly in the pyrolysate of neutralised TOFA.
O
cnly in the pyrolysate of neutralised TOR.Table 3
Classification of aromatic pyrolysis products (including their formula) from the tall oil studies.
Aromatics, one benzene ring
Benzene
C6H6
Toluene
C7H8
Ethylbenzene
C8H10
Styrene
C8H8
o-Xylene and p-xylenec
C8H10
Cumenec
C8H12
Propenylbenzene
C9H12
Isocumeneb
C9H12
o-Ethyltoluene and m-ethyltoluene
C9H12
α-Methylstyrolc
C9H10
m-Vinyltolueneb
C9H10
2-Isopropyltoluene
C10H14
Indaneb
C9H10
Indene
C9H8
1,2-Diethylbenzenec
C10H14
m-Propyltoluenec and o-propyltolueneb
C10H14
Butylbenzeneb
C10H14
β-Dimethylstyrene
C10H12
2,5-Dimethylstyrenec
C10H12
p-Methylcumenec
C10H14
o-Allyltoluenec
C10H12
2-Butenylbenzene
C10H12
α,p-Dimethylstyrenec
C10H12
p-Ethylcumenec
C11H16
2-Phenyl-2-pentene
C11H14
2,4-Dimethylcumenec
C11H16
1-Methylindeneb
C10H10
o-Isopropyl-α-methylstyrenec
C12H16
Phenoprenec
C10H10
Pentylbenzeneb
C11H16
1,2-Dihydronaphthaleneb
C10H10
p-Isobutyltolueneb
C11H16
3-Phenyl-2-pentenec
C11H14
1,1-Dimethylindene
C11H12
Trimethyl(1-methylethyl)benzenec
C12H18
2,3-Dihydro-1,1,6-trimethylindenec
C12H16
1,4-Dimethyltetralinc
C12H16
1,3-Dimethylindenec and 4,7-dimethylindenec
C11H12
1,2-Diethyl-3,4-dimethylbenzenec
C12H18
Hexylbenzeneb
C12H18
(1-Methylbuta-1,3-dienyl)benzenec
C11H12
1,2-Dihydro-3-methylnaphthalenec
C11H12
1,1,3-Trimethylindenec
C12H14
β,2,4,6-Tetramethylstyrenec
C12H16
1,1,6-Trimethyltetralinc
C13H18
1-Phenyl-1,3-hexadienec
C12H14
Heptylbenzeneb
C13H20
o-Hexyltolueneb
C13H20
(2,4,6-Trimethylphenyl)allenec
C12H14
1,1-Dimethyl-3-vinylindanc
C13H16
Octylbenzeneb
C14H22
3-Ethyl-1-(1-methylethyl)indenec
C14H18
Nonylbenzeneb
C15H24
Decylbenzeneb
C16H26
Methyl-1-methyleneoctahydrophenanthrenec
C16H20
Undecylbenzeneb
C17H28
4,8-Diethyl-1,5-dimethyldicyclopenta[a,d]benzenec
C18H26
Aromatics, two benzene rings
Naphthalene
C10H8
α-Methylnaphthalene and β-methylnaphthalene
C11H10
1,3-Dimethylnaphthalene and
C12H12
2,6-dimethylnaphthalenec
1-Ethylnaphthalenec
C12H12
2-Ethenylnaphthalenec
C12H10
2-(1-Methylethyl)naphthalenec
C13H14
1,4,5-Trimethylnaphthalenec
C13H14
1,2,3,4-Tetramethylnaphthalenec
C14H16
1-Methyl-7-(1-methylethyl)naphthalenec
C14H16
4,4′-Dimethyl-1,1′-biphenylc
C14H14
1,6-Dimethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)naphthalenec
C15H18
9,10-Dihydro-1-methylphenanthrenec
C15H16
1,1-Diphenyl-1,3-pentadienec
C17H16
Bis(1-methylethyl)-1,1′-biphenylc
C18H22
9-Butyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroanthracenec
C18H22
Aromatics, three benzene rings
1-Methyl-phenanthrenec
C15H12
2,3,5-Trimethylphenanthrenec
C17H16
1-Methyl-7-(1-methylethyl)phenanthrenec
C18H18
Methyl-n-propylphenanthrenec
C18H18
Phenolics and other oxygen containing aromatics
Phenolb
C6H6O
2-Methylphenolc
C7H8O
2,5-Dimethylphenolc
C8H10O
1-(2,4-Dimethylphenyl)ethanonec
C10H12O
4-(1-Methylethyl)benzenemethanolc
C10H14O
2,3-Dihydro-3,3-dimethylinden-1-olc
C11H14O
1-(1,1′-Biphenyl)-4-yl-ethanonec
C14H12O
Isomaturninc
C16H14O3
C
aompounds are listed within each substance group according to their GC retention times.
O
bnly in the pyrolysate of neutralised TOFA.
O
cnly in the pyrolysate of neutralised TOR.Figure 3
The main products formed in the pyrolysis experiments (750°C and 20 s) with neutralised TOFA. Numbers indicate the amount of carbon atoms in a molecule.The main compounds in the pyrolysate from the neutralised TOR characteristically comprised various aromatics with one to three benzene rings, while a lower amount of aliphatic hydrocarbons could clearly be detected (Figures2 and 4, Tables 2 and 3). In this case, the portion of unknown pyrolysis products was very high (approx., 44%). However, it could be assumed (based also on MS spectra) that a large portion of these unidentified compounds consist of a wide range of polyaromatic hydrocarbon derivatives. For example, it has been found earlier [26] that the most abundant resin acid-derived pyrolysis products are naphthalene derivatives. Moreover, pyrolysis experiments with abietic acid [27] indicated that besides fragmentation and decarboxylation reactions, dehydrogenation is of importance, suggesting thermochemical stability of the decahydrophenanthrene ring structure. In the pyrolysis of neutralised TOR, as was also the case with neutralised TOFA, no significant amounts of phenolics were formed.Figure 4
The main products formed in the pyrolysis experiments (750°C and 20 s) with neutralised TOR. Numbers indicate the amount of carbon atoms in a molecule.The total amount of pyrolysis products recovered from laboratory-scale pyrolysers is normally rather low, even though these products can be considered to reflect well the main chemistry involved. In our experiments, quantitative analyses indicated that the detectable amounts of liquefiable products were (expressed as % of the initial dry solids) 1.4% from neutralised TOFA and 1.1 from neutralised TOR.


## 3.1. Raw Materials

The total amounts of fatty acids and resin acids detected in TOFA were about 94% and 3%, respectively. Values were slightly different from those given by the manufacturer (97% and 1.7%, resp.), which was probably due to our inaccurate compound quantification (i.e., in all cases, the response factors used between the GC peak areas derived from the internal standards and compounds were equal to 1) and a fact that not all peaks (the amount of unidentified peaks was about 3%, Table1) could be identified. Due to double-bond rearrangements, four different isomers of conjugated C18:2 acids were found. The main fatty acid components were unsaturated linoleic (C18:2), oleic (C18:1), and linolenic (C18:3) acids.Table 1
Composition of total extractives (% of the total).
TOFA
TOR
Formula
Fatty acids
Palmitic acid
0.1
*
C16H32O2
Margaric acid
0.1
C17H34O2
17:0 anteiso
0.1
C17H34O2
Linolenic acid
8.5
C18H30O2
Linoleic acid
48.1
C18H32O2
Oleic acid
24.6
C18H34O2
Stearic acid
3.5
*
C18H36O2
18:2 (conjugated)
0.8
C18H32O2
18:2 (conjugated)
1.8
C18H32O2
18:2 (conjugated)
2.4
C18H32O2
18:3 (conjugated)
0.9
C18H30O2
10-Nonadecenoic acid
1.1
C19H36O2
Nonadecanoic acid
0.2
C19H38O2
Eicosatrienoic acid
1.2
C20H34O2
Eicosadienoic acid
0.2
C20H36O2
Eicosenoic acid
0.2
C20H38O2
Arachidic acid
0.2
0.4
C20H40O2
Behenic acid
2.2
C22H44O2
Lignoseric acid
0.5
C24H48O2
∑
94.0
3.1
Resin acids
Secohydroabietic acid
*
C20H30O2
8,15-Isopimaridien-18-oic acid
*
1.3
C20H30O2
8,15-Pimaradien-18-oic acid
1.8
1.1
C20H30O2
Pimaric acid
1.0
3.3
C20H30O2
Sandaracopimaric acid
0.1
1.2
C20H30O2
Isopimaric acid
0.1
4.3
C20H30O2
Palustric acid
10.6
C20H30O2
Dihydroabietic acid
0.5
C20H32O2
Levopimaric acid
0.3
C20H30O2
Dehydroabietic acid
21.4
C20H28O2
Abietic acid
36.2
C20H30O2
Abietatetraenoic acid
1.0
C21H28O2
Neoabietic acid
1.7
C20H30O2
Isodehydroabietic acid
*
C20H30O2
Hydroxydehydroabietic acid
1.2
C20H28O3
Unidentified hydroxy resin acid
1.4
C20H30O3
Dihydroxydehydroabietic acid
0.3
C20H28O4
Hydroxy-7-oxodehydroabietic acid
0.4
C20H26O4
∑
3.0
86.2
Unknown
3.0
10.7
T
*races of the compound detected in qualitative analysis, not enough for the quantification.
Abbreviations: TOFA: neutralised tall oil fatty acid mixture and TOR: neutralised tall oil resin acid mixture.The composition of resin acids in TOR differed significantly from that in CTO, indicating various decomposition and isomerisation reactions during distillation [24]. For this reason, the amount of unidentified peaks (mainly various resin acid derivatives) was also relatively high (about 10% of the total peak areas, Table 1). The total amounts of fatty acids and resin acids detected in TOR were about 3% and 86%, respectively. These values differed from those given by the manufacturer (92% and 3.5%), probably because of the limitation of the analysis method mentioned above. The main resin acid components were abietane-type acids, abietic, dehydroabietic, and palustric acids.


## 3.2. Pyrolysis of Soap Mixtures

All the pyrolysates contained significant amounts of highly volatile products marked as “C3–C5 compounds” in Figure 2, primarily corresponding to both alkenes and alkanes. However, due to the low resolution of these numerous low-molecular-mass compounds, their proper identification was not possible with the apparatus used.Figure 2
Percentage of the TIC peak areas of various pyrolysis products groups and the standard deviation of the results.The pyrolysis of neutralised TOFA resulted in a high amount of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons (Figures2 and 3, Table 2), although some aromatics with one benzene ring were also formed (Figure 2, Table 3). The most prominent fractions were alkenes (C6–C12) and alkadienes (C11, C12 and C17) together with benzene and methylbenzene. The alkadienes can be considered representatives of the typical reaction products derived, for example, from oleic acid (C18:1). Due to the lower dissociation energies of allyl bonds, the presence of the double bond in the alkyl chain favours the homolytic C–C cleavage at the allyl position rather than the homolytic C–C cleavage adjacent to the carboxylic group [25]. For this reason, a relatively significant amount of 1-undecene was formed from oleic acid. The additional double bonds in the alkyl chain (cf., linoleic (C18:2) and linolenic (C18:3) acids) favoured cyclisation and aromatisation, thus explaining a considerable amount (about 13% of the total compounds, Figures 2 and 3) of aromatics detected in the TOFA pyrolysate. The amount of various unidentified compounds was about 29% of the total compounds.Table 2
Classificationa of aliphatic pyrolysis products (including their formula) from the tall oil studies.
n
-Alk-1-enes and other alkenes
1-Hexene
C6H12
1-Heptene
C7H14
1-Octene and other octenesb
C8H16
1-Noneneband other nonenesb
C9H18
1-Deceneband other decenesb
C10H20
1-Undecene and other undecenesb
C11H22
1-Dodecene and other dodecenesb
C12H24
1-Trideceneband other tridecenesb
C13H26
1-Tetradeceneb and other tetradecenesb
C14H28
1-Pentadeceneb
C15H30
1-Hexadeceneb
C16H32
1-Heptadeceneb
C17H34
Alkanes
Heptane
C7H16
Octane
C8H18
Nonaneb
C9H20
Decaneb
C10H22
Undecane
C11H24
Dodecaneb
C12H26
Tridecane
C13H28
Tetradecaneb
C14H30
Pentadecaneb
C15H32
Dienes
2-Methyl-2,3-hexadiene
C7H12
2,5-Dimethyl-2,4-hexadienec
C8H14
1,3-Octadieneb
C8H14
1,3-Nonadieneb
C9H16
1,4-Undecadieneband 2,4-undecadieneb
C11H20
2,4-Dodecadieneb
C12H22
1,9-Tetradecadieneb
C14H26
1,15-Hexadecadieneb
C16H30
6,8-Heptadecadieneb
C17H32
Cycloalkanes
Butylcyclopentaneb
C9H18
Nonylcyclopentaneb
C14H28
Nonylcyclohexaneb
C15H30
Cycloalkenes
Methylcyclopentadienec
C6H8
1-Methyl-1,4-cyclohexadiene
C7H10
3-Ethenylcyclopenteneb
C7H10
5,6-Dimethyl-1,3-cyclohexadienec and
C8H12
1,5-dimethyl-1,4-cyclohexadienec
1,3,8-p-Menthatriene
C10H14
1,4-Dimethyldihydroazulenec
C12H14
Terpenes and terpenoids
α-Terpinenec
C10H16
Δ3-Carenec
C10H16
Limonenec
C10H16
Chamazulenec
C14H16
1,4-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethyl)azulenec
C15H18
Stigmastan-3,5-dienc
C29H48
Terpenes and terpenoids containing oxygen
Borneolc
C10H18O
1-Methyloestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-18-nor-17-ketonec
C18H22O
Ketones
2-Dodecanoneb
C12H24O
2-Nonadecanoneb
C19H38O
Other Oxygen containing compounds
10,12-Hexadecadienalb
C16H28O
9,12,15-Octadecatrien-1-olb
C18H32O
Others
1,4-Bis(methylene)cyclohexanec
C8H12
5-Dodecen-7-yneb
C12H20
1-(2′-Methyl-1′-propenyl)-7-(1′-propynyl)-  tricyclohexanec
C8H12
1-Hexadecyneb
C16H30
Hexaethylidenecyclohexanec
C18H24
10-Demethylsqualenec
C19H48
C
aompounds are listed within each substance group according to their GC retention times.
O
bnly in the pyrolysate of neutralised TOFA.
O
cnly in the pyrolysate of neutralised TOR.Table 3
Classification of aromatic pyrolysis products (including their formula) from the tall oil studies.
Aromatics, one benzene ring
Benzene
C6H6
Toluene
C7H8
Ethylbenzene
C8H10
Styrene
C8H8
o-Xylene and p-xylenec
C8H10
Cumenec
C8H12
Propenylbenzene
C9H12
Isocumeneb
C9H12
o-Ethyltoluene and m-ethyltoluene
C9H12
α-Methylstyrolc
C9H10
m-Vinyltolueneb
C9H10
2-Isopropyltoluene
C10H14
Indaneb
C9H10
Indene
C9H8
1,2-Diethylbenzenec
C10H14
m-Propyltoluenec and o-propyltolueneb
C10H14
Butylbenzeneb
C10H14
β-Dimethylstyrene
C10H12
2,5-Dimethylstyrenec
C10H12
p-Methylcumenec
C10H14
o-Allyltoluenec
C10H12
2-Butenylbenzene
C10H12
α,p-Dimethylstyrenec
C10H12
p-Ethylcumenec
C11H16
2-Phenyl-2-pentene
C11H14
2,4-Dimethylcumenec
C11H16
1-Methylindeneb
C10H10
o-Isopropyl-α-methylstyrenec
C12H16
Phenoprenec
C10H10
Pentylbenzeneb
C11H16
1,2-Dihydronaphthaleneb
C10H10
p-Isobutyltolueneb
C11H16
3-Phenyl-2-pentenec
C11H14
1,1-Dimethylindene
C11H12
Trimethyl(1-methylethyl)benzenec
C12H18
2,3-Dihydro-1,1,6-trimethylindenec
C12H16
1,4-Dimethyltetralinc
C12H16
1,3-Dimethylindenec and 4,7-dimethylindenec
C11H12
1,2-Diethyl-3,4-dimethylbenzenec
C12H18
Hexylbenzeneb
C12H18
(1-Methylbuta-1,3-dienyl)benzenec
C11H12
1,2-Dihydro-3-methylnaphthalenec
C11H12
1,1,3-Trimethylindenec
C12H14
β,2,4,6-Tetramethylstyrenec
C12H16
1,1,6-Trimethyltetralinc
C13H18
1-Phenyl-1,3-hexadienec
C12H14
Heptylbenzeneb
C13H20
o-Hexyltolueneb
C13H20
(2,4,6-Trimethylphenyl)allenec
C12H14
1,1-Dimethyl-3-vinylindanc
C13H16
Octylbenzeneb
C14H22
3-Ethyl-1-(1-methylethyl)indenec
C14H18
Nonylbenzeneb
C15H24
Decylbenzeneb
C16H26
Methyl-1-methyleneoctahydrophenanthrenec
C16H20
Undecylbenzeneb
C17H28
4,8-Diethyl-1,5-dimethyldicyclopenta[a,d]benzenec
C18H26
Aromatics, two benzene rings
Naphthalene
C10H8
α-Methylnaphthalene and β-methylnaphthalene
C11H10
1,3-Dimethylnaphthalene and
C12H12
2,6-dimethylnaphthalenec
1-Ethylnaphthalenec
C12H12
2-Ethenylnaphthalenec
C12H10
2-(1-Methylethyl)naphthalenec
C13H14
1,4,5-Trimethylnaphthalenec
C13H14
1,2,3,4-Tetramethylnaphthalenec
C14H16
1-Methyl-7-(1-methylethyl)naphthalenec
C14H16
4,4′-Dimethyl-1,1′-biphenylc
C14H14
1,6-Dimethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)naphthalenec
C15H18
9,10-Dihydro-1-methylphenanthrenec
C15H16
1,1-Diphenyl-1,3-pentadienec
C17H16
Bis(1-methylethyl)-1,1′-biphenylc
C18H22
9-Butyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroanthracenec
C18H22
Aromatics, three benzene rings
1-Methyl-phenanthrenec
C15H12
2,3,5-Trimethylphenanthrenec
C17H16
1-Methyl-7-(1-methylethyl)phenanthrenec
C18H18
Methyl-n-propylphenanthrenec
C18H18
Phenolics and other oxygen containing aromatics
Phenolb
C6H6O
2-Methylphenolc
C7H8O
2,5-Dimethylphenolc
C8H10O
1-(2,4-Dimethylphenyl)ethanonec
C10H12O
4-(1-Methylethyl)benzenemethanolc
C10H14O
2,3-Dihydro-3,3-dimethylinden-1-olc
C11H14O
1-(1,1′-Biphenyl)-4-yl-ethanonec
C14H12O
Isomaturninc
C16H14O3
C
aompounds are listed within each substance group according to their GC retention times.
O
bnly in the pyrolysate of neutralised TOFA.
O
cnly in the pyrolysate of neutralised TOR.Figure 3
The main products formed in the pyrolysis experiments (750°C and 20 s) with neutralised TOFA. Numbers indicate the amount of carbon atoms in a molecule.The main compounds in the pyrolysate from the neutralised TOR characteristically comprised various aromatics with one to three benzene rings, while a lower amount of aliphatic hydrocarbons could clearly be detected (Figures2 and 4, Tables 2 and 3). In this case, the portion of unknown pyrolysis products was very high (approx., 44%). However, it could be assumed (based also on MS spectra) that a large portion of these unidentified compounds consist of a wide range of polyaromatic hydrocarbon derivatives. For example, it has been found earlier [26] that the most abundant resin acid-derived pyrolysis products are naphthalene derivatives. Moreover, pyrolysis experiments with abietic acid [27] indicated that besides fragmentation and decarboxylation reactions, dehydrogenation is of importance, suggesting thermochemical stability of the decahydrophenanthrene ring structure. In the pyrolysis of neutralised TOR, as was also the case with neutralised TOFA, no significant amounts of phenolics were formed.Figure 4
The main products formed in the pyrolysis experiments (750°C and 20 s) with neutralised TOR. Numbers indicate the amount of carbon atoms in a molecule.The total amount of pyrolysis products recovered from laboratory-scale pyrolysers is normally rather low, even though these products can be considered to reflect well the main chemistry involved. In our experiments, quantitative analyses indicated that the detectable amounts of liquefiable products were (expressed as % of the initial dry solids) 1.4% from neutralised TOFA and 1.1 from neutralised TOR.


## 4. Conclusions

The main findings from this study can be summarised as follows.(i)
The composition of tall oil soap has a clear effect on the composition of pyrolysis products originating from it. The characteristic fragmentation patterns for this feedstock material can be detected. The effects of the main constituents in the raw material on the distribution of pyrolysis products are typically seen.(ii)
Resin-acid-containing soaps mainly result in the pronounced formation of aromatics during pyrolysis, whereas aliphatic unsaturated and saturated hydrocarbons can be principally obtained from fatty acid-containing soaps.(iii)
When considering the possible tall oil-based production of renewable diesel, with respect to product quality (i.e., the need for low contents of aromatics and oxygen-containing compounds), fatty-acid-rich fractions seem to be more suitable feedstocks than resin-acid-rich fractions.



---

*Source: 409157-2012-07-26.xml*