# Optimal Heater Control with Technology of Fault Tolerance for Compensating Thermoforming Preheating System

Authors: Zhen-Zhe Li; Tai-Hong Cheng; Yun-De Shen; Dong-Ji Xuan
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

The adjustment of heater power is very important because the distribution of thickness strongly depends on the distribution of sheet temperature. In this paper, the steady state optimum distribution of heater power is searched by numerical optimization in order to get uniform sheet temperature. In the following step, optimal heater power distribution with a damaged heater was found out using the technology of fault tolerance, which will be used to reduce the repairing time when some heaters are damaged. The merit of this work is that the design variable was the power of each heater which can be directly used in the preheating process of thermoforming.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Currently, the properties of the composite materials have been improved with development of the materials science and engineering. The study on the composite materials in the past was mainly focused on the chemical components and the physical structures. There is a trend that the composite materials take the place of the original metal materials in some engineering fields with development of the properties of the composite materials. Therefore, the study on the forming performance of the composite materials is also important.Thermoforming is one of the most versatile and economical processes available for shaping polymer products, but obtaining a uniform thickness of final products using this method is difficult. Thermal management of thermoforming processes is very important because the thickness distribution strongly depends on the distribution of the sheet temperature [1, 2].In order to improve the performance of final products and decrease the manufacturing cost, the design variables of thermoforming system and the operating parameters should be optimized. For realizing the optimization, the processes of thermoforming should be simulated. But, the simulation models for these processes of thermoforming have not been systematically constructed well. Therefore, the engineers only depend on trial and error. The design efficiency is too low, and design and manufacturing cost cannot be decreased significantly when using the method based on trial and error.For simulating the preheating process of thermoforming, the complex phenomena such as phase change should be considered. Many researchers have studied the preheating process of thermoforming using many kinds of techniques. The materials used for thermoforming have their own absorption bands, and the ceramic heaters can be considered in which only the surfaces of the sheet are heated by the heaters. Therefore, the temperature between the surface and the center of the sheet is significantly different. In order to solve this problem, Jeffery and so forth have applied the infrared heaters to the preheating system of thermoforming, but the problem has not been solved ultimately due to the properties of the materials used for thermoforming [3–8].The optimization study should be carried out for satisfying the requirements about the size, the operating conditions, and so forth defined by the users. Many researchers have studied the optimization of thermoforming processes using a lot of techniques such as numerical optimization, neural network, and design of experiments [9–14].The focus of this study has been set to the preheating process of thermoforming. When the temperature of ABS (Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene) sheet is heated to over glass transition temperature in the preheating process, the specific heat of ABS sheet is significantly changed, and the heat caused by radiation heat transfer and convection heat transfer is also changed. So, nonlinear problem should be considered because of variation of properties and operating condition. At first, the steady state optimum distribution of heater power is searched by a numerical optimization in order to get uniform sheet temperature. If the final temperature of sheet is considered, unsteady analysis must be required. To reduce the analysis time, mean value of initial and objective temperature is used in the calculation of steady state. In the following step, the optimal heater power distribution under the condition of having a damaged heater was found out using the technology of fault tolerance, which will be used to reduce the repairing time when some heaters are damaged.


## 2. Analysis Model and Governing Equation

### 2.1. Analysis Model

In this study, the ceramic heater shown in Figure1 was considered. The feature of the ceramic heaters in the preheating chamber was shown in Figure 2. In the preheating process, ABS sheet was located as shown in Figure 3. The size of the sheet is 2 m × 1 m × 0.003 m. There are 80 (10 × 8) heaters in the upper and lower sides, respectively, and the heating time is 100 s. The distance between the heaters and the sheet is 0.2 m. The temperature in the forming machine is set as 303 K. The convection between the heater and outside was neglected. There is power input (q
e
l
e
c) in each heater during the heating time. The maximum available heating power of each heater is 650 W.Figure 1
Ceramic heater.Figure 2
Feature of installed heaters in heating chamber.Figure 3
Schematic of model.The sheet and the heater were assumed as diffuse, gray surface, and the environment was assumed as blackbody. The emissivities of the sheet and the heater are 0.85 and 0.9, respectively.


### 2.2. Governing Equation

#### 2.2.1. Radiation Heat Transfer

Net Radiation Method was used to calculate radiation heat transfer. The following equation can be obtained using heat from the heater and the surface temperature of sheet [15]:(1)
∑
j
=
1
N
a
k
j
J
j
=
C
k
(2)
a
k
j
=
δ
k
j
-
F
k
-
j
δ
k
j
-
1
-
ε
k
F
k
-
j
,where (3)
C
k
=
q
h
,
k
A
k
-
σ
T
∞
4
1
≤
k
≤
n
h
ε
k
σ
T
k
4
-
σ
T
∞
4
n
h
+
1
≤
k
≤
n
k
+
n
s
δ
k
j
=
1
w
h
e
n
k
=
j
0
w
h
e
n
k
≠
j
,where J
j is the radiosity of jth element (Wm−2); F
k
-
j is the view factor from k surface to j surface; ε
k is the emissivity of kth element; A
k is the area of kth element (m2); σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.67 × 10–8 Wm−2 K−1); and T
∞ is the environmental temperature (K).Using (4), the heat flux can be obtained using the calculated radiosity, and the temperature of the heater can be calculated by using (5). Consider(4)
q
r
a
d
,
j
′
′
=
-
ε
j
1
-
ε
j
σ
T
j
4
-
J
j
j
=
n
h
+
1
~
N
(5)
T
j
=
ε
j
/
1
-
ε
j
q
j
′
′
+
J
j
σ
4
j
=
1
~
n
h
.


#### 2.2.2. Convective Heat Transfer

Natural convection must be considered to analyze the preheating process of thermoforming [16]. The heat transfer coefficient (h) can be calculated using Goldstei, Lloyd, and Moran’s correlation. Equations (6) and (7) can be used to calculate the heat transfer coefficient of the upper surface of the sheet, and (8) can be used to obtain the heat transfer coefficient of the lower surface of the sheet [16], where k is the thermal conductivity (Wm−1 K−1). Consider(6)
h
-
L
k
=
0.54
R
a
L
1
/
4
1
0
4
≤
R
a
L
≤
1
0
7
(7)
h
-
L
k
=
0.15
R
a
L
1
/
3
1
0
7
≤
R
a
L
≤
1
0
11
(8)
h
-
L
k
=
0.27
R
a
L
1
/
4
1
0
5
≤
R
a
L
≤
1
0
10
.The characteristic length (L) is formulated as (9), and Rayleigh number (R
a
L) is expressed as (10). Consider(9)
L
≡
A
s
P
(10)
R
a
L
=
g
β
T
-
T
∞
L
3
υ
a
,where P is the length of the circumference (m); g is the acceleration of gravity (m/s2); β is the volume expansion coefficient of air (K−1); υ is the dynamic viscosity of air (m2 s−1); and a is the thermal diffusivity of air (m2 s−1).The convective heat transfer from the sheet to the environment (q
c
o
n
v
,
j
′
′) is obtained by using the calculated heat transfer coefficient.


#### 2.2.3. Conductive Heat Transfer

The conductive heat transfer is used to simulate the sheet’s preheating process, and it was simplified to a 1D problem through the direction of the sheet’s thickness [17]. Fully implicit method is used as (11), and the boundary condition is expressed as (12) [18–20], where ρ is the density of ABS sheet (kg/m−3). Consider(11)
T
i
-
T
i
o
l
d
Δ
t
=
k
ρ
c
T
i
+
1
-
2
T
i
+
T
i
-
1
Δ
z
2
(12)
q
i
n
,
j
′
′
=
q
r
a
d
,
j
′
′
-
q
∞
n
υ
,
j
′
′
j
=
n
h
+
1
~
N
.


## 2.1. Analysis Model

In this study, the ceramic heater shown in Figure1 was considered. The feature of the ceramic heaters in the preheating chamber was shown in Figure 2. In the preheating process, ABS sheet was located as shown in Figure 3. The size of the sheet is 2 m × 1 m × 0.003 m. There are 80 (10 × 8) heaters in the upper and lower sides, respectively, and the heating time is 100 s. The distance between the heaters and the sheet is 0.2 m. The temperature in the forming machine is set as 303 K. The convection between the heater and outside was neglected. There is power input (q
e
l
e
c) in each heater during the heating time. The maximum available heating power of each heater is 650 W.Figure 1
Ceramic heater.Figure 2
Feature of installed heaters in heating chamber.Figure 3
Schematic of model.The sheet and the heater were assumed as diffuse, gray surface, and the environment was assumed as blackbody. The emissivities of the sheet and the heater are 0.85 and 0.9, respectively.


## 2.2. Governing Equation

### 2.2.1. Radiation Heat Transfer

Net Radiation Method was used to calculate radiation heat transfer. The following equation can be obtained using heat from the heater and the surface temperature of sheet [15]:(1)
∑
j
=
1
N
a
k
j
J
j
=
C
k
(2)
a
k
j
=
δ
k
j
-
F
k
-
j
δ
k
j
-
1
-
ε
k
F
k
-
j
,where (3)
C
k
=
q
h
,
k
A
k
-
σ
T
∞
4
1
≤
k
≤
n
h
ε
k
σ
T
k
4
-
σ
T
∞
4
n
h
+
1
≤
k
≤
n
k
+
n
s
δ
k
j
=
1
w
h
e
n
k
=
j
0
w
h
e
n
k
≠
j
,where J
j is the radiosity of jth element (Wm−2); F
k
-
j is the view factor from k surface to j surface; ε
k is the emissivity of kth element; A
k is the area of kth element (m2); σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.67 × 10–8 Wm−2 K−1); and T
∞ is the environmental temperature (K).Using (4), the heat flux can be obtained using the calculated radiosity, and the temperature of the heater can be calculated by using (5). Consider(4)
q
r
a
d
,
j
′
′
=
-
ε
j
1
-
ε
j
σ
T
j
4
-
J
j
j
=
n
h
+
1
~
N
(5)
T
j
=
ε
j
/
1
-
ε
j
q
j
′
′
+
J
j
σ
4
j
=
1
~
n
h
.


### 2.2.2. Convective Heat Transfer

Natural convection must be considered to analyze the preheating process of thermoforming [16]. The heat transfer coefficient (h) can be calculated using Goldstei, Lloyd, and Moran’s correlation. Equations (6) and (7) can be used to calculate the heat transfer coefficient of the upper surface of the sheet, and (8) can be used to obtain the heat transfer coefficient of the lower surface of the sheet [16], where k is the thermal conductivity (Wm−1 K−1). Consider(6)
h
-
L
k
=
0.54
R
a
L
1
/
4
1
0
4
≤
R
a
L
≤
1
0
7
(7)
h
-
L
k
=
0.15
R
a
L
1
/
3
1
0
7
≤
R
a
L
≤
1
0
11
(8)
h
-
L
k
=
0.27
R
a
L
1
/
4
1
0
5
≤
R
a
L
≤
1
0
10
.The characteristic length (L) is formulated as (9), and Rayleigh number (R
a
L) is expressed as (10). Consider(9)
L
≡
A
s
P
(10)
R
a
L
=
g
β
T
-
T
∞
L
3
υ
a
,where P is the length of the circumference (m); g is the acceleration of gravity (m/s2); β is the volume expansion coefficient of air (K−1); υ is the dynamic viscosity of air (m2 s−1); and a is the thermal diffusivity of air (m2 s−1).The convective heat transfer from the sheet to the environment (q
c
o
n
v
,
j
′
′) is obtained by using the calculated heat transfer coefficient.


### 2.2.3. Conductive Heat Transfer

The conductive heat transfer is used to simulate the sheet’s preheating process, and it was simplified to a 1D problem through the direction of the sheet’s thickness [17]. Fully implicit method is used as (11), and the boundary condition is expressed as (12) [18–20], where ρ is the density of ABS sheet (kg/m−3). Consider(11)
T
i
-
T
i
o
l
d
Δ
t
=
k
ρ
c
T
i
+
1
-
2
T
i
+
T
i
-
1
Δ
z
2
(12)
q
i
n
,
j
′
′
=
q
r
a
d
,
j
′
′
-
q
∞
n
υ
,
j
′
′
j
=
n
h
+
1
~
N
.


## 2.2.1. Radiation Heat Transfer

Net Radiation Method was used to calculate radiation heat transfer. The following equation can be obtained using heat from the heater and the surface temperature of sheet [15]:(1)
∑
j
=
1
N
a
k
j
J
j
=
C
k
(2)
a
k
j
=
δ
k
j
-
F
k
-
j
δ
k
j
-
1
-
ε
k
F
k
-
j
,where (3)
C
k
=
q
h
,
k
A
k
-
σ
T
∞
4
1
≤
k
≤
n
h
ε
k
σ
T
k
4
-
σ
T
∞
4
n
h
+
1
≤
k
≤
n
k
+
n
s
δ
k
j
=
1
w
h
e
n
k
=
j
0
w
h
e
n
k
≠
j
,where J
j is the radiosity of jth element (Wm−2); F
k
-
j is the view factor from k surface to j surface; ε
k is the emissivity of kth element; A
k is the area of kth element (m2); σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.67 × 10–8 Wm−2 K−1); and T
∞ is the environmental temperature (K).Using (4), the heat flux can be obtained using the calculated radiosity, and the temperature of the heater can be calculated by using (5). Consider(4)
q
r
a
d
,
j
′
′
=
-
ε
j
1
-
ε
j
σ
T
j
4
-
J
j
j
=
n
h
+
1
~
N
(5)
T
j
=
ε
j
/
1
-
ε
j
q
j
′
′
+
J
j
σ
4
j
=
1
~
n
h
.


## 2.2.2. Convective Heat Transfer

Natural convection must be considered to analyze the preheating process of thermoforming [16]. The heat transfer coefficient (h) can be calculated using Goldstei, Lloyd, and Moran’s correlation. Equations (6) and (7) can be used to calculate the heat transfer coefficient of the upper surface of the sheet, and (8) can be used to obtain the heat transfer coefficient of the lower surface of the sheet [16], where k is the thermal conductivity (Wm−1 K−1). Consider(6)
h
-
L
k
=
0.54
R
a
L
1
/
4
1
0
4
≤
R
a
L
≤
1
0
7
(7)
h
-
L
k
=
0.15
R
a
L
1
/
3
1
0
7
≤
R
a
L
≤
1
0
11
(8)
h
-
L
k
=
0.27
R
a
L
1
/
4
1
0
5
≤
R
a
L
≤
1
0
10
.The characteristic length (L) is formulated as (9), and Rayleigh number (R
a
L) is expressed as (10). Consider(9)
L
≡
A
s
P
(10)
R
a
L
=
g
β
T
-
T
∞
L
3
υ
a
,where P is the length of the circumference (m); g is the acceleration of gravity (m/s2); β is the volume expansion coefficient of air (K−1); υ is the dynamic viscosity of air (m2 s−1); and a is the thermal diffusivity of air (m2 s−1).The convective heat transfer from the sheet to the environment (q
c
o
n
v
,
j
′
′) is obtained by using the calculated heat transfer coefficient.


## 2.2.3. Conductive Heat Transfer

The conductive heat transfer is used to simulate the sheet’s preheating process, and it was simplified to a 1D problem through the direction of the sheet’s thickness [17]. Fully implicit method is used as (11), and the boundary condition is expressed as (12) [18–20], where ρ is the density of ABS sheet (kg/m−3). Consider(11)
T
i
-
T
i
o
l
d
Δ
t
=
k
ρ
c
T
i
+
1
-
2
T
i
+
T
i
-
1
Δ
z
2
(12)
q
i
n
,
j
′
′
=
q
r
a
d
,
j
′
′
-
q
∞
n
υ
,
j
′
′
j
=
n
h
+
1
~
N
.


## 3. Optimal Heater Power Distribution

The distribution of the heater power inputs in each position is important to obtain uniform temperature distribution of ABS sheet. Using (13), the requirement of heat flux heated from initial temperature (T
i) to objective temperature (T
f) can be calculated. The temperature-dependent specific heat of ABS sheet was from our previous research [21]. Consider(13)
q
r
e
q
,
j
′
′
=
m
j
2
t
h
A
j
∫
T
i
T
f
C
p
T
d
T
,where t
h is the heating time (s); m
j is the mass of jth element (kg); and C
p
(
T
) is the temperature-dependent specific heat of ABS sheet (Jkg−1 K−1).To find out the optimal distribution of heater power inputs for uniform temperature distribution, each heater power input is the design variable. The objective function has been set as (14). The temperature of the sheet was set as (
T
i
+
T
f
)
/
2. In steady state, only the calculation of radiation heat transfer and convective heat transfer is needed. The constraints were set in such a way that each heater input must be smaller than the maximum usable power (650 W). SQP (sequential quadratic programming) was used as the optimization algorithm [22–24]. Consider(14)
f
=
∑
j
=
n
+
1
N
q
r
e
q
,
j
′
′
-
q
i
n
,
j
′
′
2
R
I
G
H
T
1
/
2
N
.In this section, the optimization was only carried out for the heater at the upper side. The optimal results of every heater power input are shown in Table1; the value of each position expresses the percentage to maximum usable power.Table 1
Optimal power distribution of heaters on upper side.
%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
100.0
80.7
88.5
86.4
86.3
88.6
80.7
100.0
2
49.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
49.8
3
8.7
11.5
28.0
22.9
23.0
27.8
11.6
8.6
4
70.8
34.5
29.8
31.2
30.8
30.1
34.3
70.9
5
30.7
12.7
22.3
19.1
19.6
21.9
13.0
30.5
6
30.5
13.0
21.9
19.6
19.1
22.4
12.7
30.6
7
70.9
34.3
30.1
30.8
31.2
29.8
34.5
70.8
8
8.6
11.6
27.8
23.0
22.9
28.0
11.5
8.6
9
49.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
49.8
10
100.0
80.6
88.6
86.3
86.4
88.5
80.7
100.0For unsteady simulation in Section4, another heater power distribution of the lower side was obtained using the same method.


## 4. Optimal Heater Power Distribution Using Technology of Fault Tolerance

When some heaters are damaged in the preheating process, some regions of the sheet will be not suitable for forming. The ideal method is to change the damaged heaters, but it will affect the mass production. In this case, the usable method is to find the new optimal heater power distribution under the condition of having the damaged heaters based on the technology of fault tolerance.


### 4.1. Effect of a Damaged Heater

In order to check the effect of a damaged heater, unsteady simulation should be carried out based on the heater power distributions of the upper and lower sides, and the effect of a damaged heater can be found from the temperature distribution of the sheet. When the upper side’s heater element(
4,4
) was assumed as the damaged heater, the region affected by the damaged heater can be found in Table 2.Table 2
Relative temperature error caused by the damaged heater.
%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
−0.09
−0.26
−0.76
−1.28
−0.76
−0.26
−0.09
−0.03
2
−0.11
−0.36
−1.39
−2.84
−1.38
−0.36
−0.11
−0.04
3
−0.13
−0.46
−2.37
−6.01
−2.37
−0.45
−0.13
−0.05
4
−0.13
−0.49
−2.91
−8.12
−2.91
−0.49
−0.14
−0.05
5
−0.13
−0.46
−2.36
−5.96
−2.36
−0.46
−0.14
−0.05
6
−0.12
−0.38
−1.42
−2.88
−1.42
−0.38
−0.12
−0.05
7
−0.10
−0.29
−0.80
−1.32
−0.80
−0.29
−0.11
−0.04
8
−0.08
−0.21
−0.47
−0.67
−0.47
−0.21
−0.09
−0.04
9
−0.06
−0.14
−0.28
−0.36
−0.28
−0.14
−0.06
−0.03
10
−0.05
−0.10
−0.17
−0.21
−0.17
−0.10
−0.05
−0.02The values in Table2 show the relative temperature errors of each position compared with the temperature distribution of the normal case. The region expressed by italic numbers is the region significantly affected by the damaged heater.


### 4.2. Optimal Design with Technology of Fault Tolerance

In order to minimize the effect caused by the damaged heater, an optimization with the technology of fault tolerance was carried out [25, 26]. In this case, the number of the design variables was 16 as shown in Table 2 with italic numbers. The objective function has been set as (5), where q
1
,
j
′
′ is the heat flux with no damaged heater and q
2
,
j
′
′ is the heat flux with damaged heater. The constraints were set in such a way that each design variable must be smaller than the maximum usable power (650 W). SQP was used as the optimization algorithm. Consider(15)
f
=
∑
j
=
n
+
1
N
q
1
,
j
′
′
-
q
2
,
j
′
′
2
1
/
2
N
.Table3 shows the optimal heater power distribution of upper surface under the condition of having the damaged heater based on the technology of fault tolerance. Table 4 shows the temperature difference of upper surface between the cases in which the upper surface’s heater element (
4,4
) was normal or not. Table 4 shows that the effect of the damaged heater has been neglected.Table 3
Optimal heater power distribution with the damaged heater.
%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
100.0
80.7
88.5
82.8
86.3
88.6
80.7
100.0
2
49.8
0.0
1.9
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
49.8
3
8.7
11.5
21.5
39.0
16.6
27.8
11.6
8.6
4
70.8
34.5
39.4
X
40.4
30.1
34.3
70.9
5
30.7
12.7
14.8
49.7
12.1
21.9
13.0
30.5
6
30.5
13.0
24.6
2.1
21.8
22.4
12.7
30.6
7
70.9
34.3
30.1
35.5
31.2
29.8
34.5
70.8
8
8.6
11.6
27.8
23.0
22.9
28.0
11.5
8.6
9
49.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
49.8
10
100.0
80.6
88.6
86.3
86.4
88.5
80.7
100.0Table 4
Temperature difference (normal versus damaged).
%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
0.6
0.2
0.1
−0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.6
2
−0.2
0.0
0.1
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
−0.2
3
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.4
4
0.0
0.1
0.2
−0.9
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
5
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
6
0.2
0.1
−0.1
−0.1
−0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
7
0.0
0.0
0.1
−0.3
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
8
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.4
9
−0.2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
−0.2
10
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.6On the view of computational effort, 16 design variables were selected. When more design variables were selected, the error can be decreased more. In this study, acceptable results were obtained using a few design variables.


## 4.1. Effect of a Damaged Heater

In order to check the effect of a damaged heater, unsteady simulation should be carried out based on the heater power distributions of the upper and lower sides, and the effect of a damaged heater can be found from the temperature distribution of the sheet. When the upper side’s heater element(
4,4
) was assumed as the damaged heater, the region affected by the damaged heater can be found in Table 2.Table 2
Relative temperature error caused by the damaged heater.
%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
−0.09
−0.26
−0.76
−1.28
−0.76
−0.26
−0.09
−0.03
2
−0.11
−0.36
−1.39
−2.84
−1.38
−0.36
−0.11
−0.04
3
−0.13
−0.46
−2.37
−6.01
−2.37
−0.45
−0.13
−0.05
4
−0.13
−0.49
−2.91
−8.12
−2.91
−0.49
−0.14
−0.05
5
−0.13
−0.46
−2.36
−5.96
−2.36
−0.46
−0.14
−0.05
6
−0.12
−0.38
−1.42
−2.88
−1.42
−0.38
−0.12
−0.05
7
−0.10
−0.29
−0.80
−1.32
−0.80
−0.29
−0.11
−0.04
8
−0.08
−0.21
−0.47
−0.67
−0.47
−0.21
−0.09
−0.04
9
−0.06
−0.14
−0.28
−0.36
−0.28
−0.14
−0.06
−0.03
10
−0.05
−0.10
−0.17
−0.21
−0.17
−0.10
−0.05
−0.02The values in Table2 show the relative temperature errors of each position compared with the temperature distribution of the normal case. The region expressed by italic numbers is the region significantly affected by the damaged heater.


## 4.2. Optimal Design with Technology of Fault Tolerance

In order to minimize the effect caused by the damaged heater, an optimization with the technology of fault tolerance was carried out [25, 26]. In this case, the number of the design variables was 16 as shown in Table 2 with italic numbers. The objective function has been set as (5), where q
1
,
j
′
′ is the heat flux with no damaged heater and q
2
,
j
′
′ is the heat flux with damaged heater. The constraints were set in such a way that each design variable must be smaller than the maximum usable power (650 W). SQP was used as the optimization algorithm. Consider(15)
f
=
∑
j
=
n
+
1
N
q
1
,
j
′
′
-
q
2
,
j
′
′
2
1
/
2
N
.Table3 shows the optimal heater power distribution of upper surface under the condition of having the damaged heater based on the technology of fault tolerance. Table 4 shows the temperature difference of upper surface between the cases in which the upper surface’s heater element (
4,4
) was normal or not. Table 4 shows that the effect of the damaged heater has been neglected.Table 3
Optimal heater power distribution with the damaged heater.
%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
100.0
80.7
88.5
82.8
86.3
88.6
80.7
100.0
2
49.8
0.0
1.9
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
49.8
3
8.7
11.5
21.5
39.0
16.6
27.8
11.6
8.6
4
70.8
34.5
39.4
X
40.4
30.1
34.3
70.9
5
30.7
12.7
14.8
49.7
12.1
21.9
13.0
30.5
6
30.5
13.0
24.6
2.1
21.8
22.4
12.7
30.6
7
70.9
34.3
30.1
35.5
31.2
29.8
34.5
70.8
8
8.6
11.6
27.8
23.0
22.9
28.0
11.5
8.6
9
49.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
49.8
10
100.0
80.6
88.6
86.3
86.4
88.5
80.7
100.0Table 4
Temperature difference (normal versus damaged).
%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
0.6
0.2
0.1
−0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.6
2
−0.2
0.0
0.1
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
−0.2
3
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.4
4
0.0
0.1
0.2
−0.9
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
5
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
6
0.2
0.1
−0.1
−0.1
−0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
7
0.0
0.0
0.1
−0.3
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
8
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.4
9
−0.2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
−0.2
10
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.6On the view of computational effort, 16 design variables were selected. When more design variables were selected, the error can be decreased more. In this study, acceptable results were obtained using a few design variables.


## 5. Conclusion

The analysis code which can be used to simulate the preheating process has been developed. In order to get the uniform distribution of temperature, the optimal distribution of heater power inputs has been found out at first under the condition of setting the temperature of sheet as the mean value of initial and objective temperature. In the following step, optimal heater power distribution with a damaged heater was found out using the technology of fault tolerance. The optimization strategy with technology of fault tolerance will be widely used in many kinds of engineering fields.



---

*Source: 403730-2015-07-07.xml*