# A Study on Physical Performance for Poly(L-lactic acid) in Addition to Layered Strontium Phenylphosphonate

Authors: Yan-Hua Zhang; Yan-Hua Cai
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The organic-inorganic hybrid layered strontium phenylphosphonate (SrP) was synthesized by using strontium chloride and phenylphosphinic acid. And the influence of layered SrP on the crystallization behavior and thermal stability of poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) was investigated through DSC, XRD, and TGA. Both DSC and XRD results demonstrated that layered SrP had the powerful accelerated ability for PLLA crystallization, and in the range of studied concentration, 0.7 wt%–1 wt% is the optimum concentration range to achieve rapid crystallization of PLLA. Meantime, as a result, the increase of cooling rate in nonisothermal crystallization procedure seriously affected the crystallization accelerated efficiency of SrP. Thermal stability measurement showed that layered SrP could cause the onset decomposition temperature of PLLA to decrease, but the thermal decomposition behavior of PLLA hardly depended on the SrP concentration.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The metal phenylphosphonate is one of the most important synthesized inorganic/organic hybrid materials. According to its unique structure similar to layered clay [1], metal phenylphosphonate has attracted continuous growing attentions in recent years [2]. Thus, many works based on metal phenylphosphonate were explored to investigate its function and effect. In chemical synthesis field, the flower-like porous aluminum phenylphosphonate microspheres with an average diameter of 8 μm were reported, and this flower-like porous structure could be achieved through a hydrothermal method; the relevant experimental results showed that the nanoflakes appearing in the initial growing stage exhibited a very important role in the formation of microflowers structure [3], whereas the aluminum phenylphosphonate was also obtained by refluxing reaction in water, and the resultant aluminum phenylphosphonate exhibited a layered structure with an interlayer spacing about 15 Å [4]. Mahmoudkhani and Langer [5] reported that the synthesized calcium phenylphosphonate not only had excellent thermal stability, but also was not soluble in water and organic solvents upon pH higher than 2, indicating a promising application in surface treatment field. In functional additive field, layered zinc phenylphosphonate was used to serve as nucleating agent for isotactic polypropylene. The crystallization behavior study showed that 0.1 wt% layered zinc phenylphosphonate caused the crystallization half-time of polypropylene to decrease from 19.42 to 1.87 min at 134°C due to the increase of nuclei density in polypropylene matrix. However, zinc phenylphosphonate could not change the crystalline structure of polypropylene [1]. Similarly, zinc phenylphosphonate was also found to be a good nucleating agent on the crystallization of the as-bacterially synthesized poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly[(3-hydroxybutyrate)-co-(3-hydroxyhexanoate)] [6] and poly(vinylidene fluoride) [7]. Additionally, the layered metal phenylphosphonate could also play an important role in enhancing the thermal stability and mechanical performance of polymers; the literature [8] reported that the layered lanthanum phenylphosphonate could remarkably promote the thermal decomposition temperature, the tensile strength, and storage moduli of glass-fiber reinforced poly(ethylene terephthalate)/microencapsulated red phosphorus systems. In catalysis field, He et al. [9] firstly synthesized the zirconium phenylphosphonate-anchored methyltrioxorhenium, and then the evaluation of the catalytic performance for epoxidation of cyclohexene was performed. The relevant results suggested that zirconium phenylphosphonate-anchored methyltrioxorhenium had advanced catalytic activity and selectivity for cyclohexene epoxidation.Poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) is type of environment-friendly polymer materials owing to its biodegradability and green production technology. Especially with the worse environmental pollution day by day, PLLA will become important general-purpose plastics and be employed in more industry and daily life fields. However, so far there are still some challenges, such as slow crystallization rate and poor heat resistance [10], to restrict the development of PLLA industry. In the case of application, it is a fact that improvement of PLLA crystallization rate is very critical. Herein, many attempts were carried out to overcome this defect [11–13]. For example, a small amount of both multiwalled carbon nanotubes and graphene nanosheets could accelerate the overall crystallization of PLLA, but the multiwalled carbon nanotubes with above 2 wt% concentration almost unchanged the overall crystallization rate of PLLA, and a high amount of graphene nanosheets (above 2.5 wt%) even retarded crystallization rate, resulting from the network structures of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and graphene nanosheets [14]. The zinc lactate is also an effective additive for changing PLLA crystallization behavior; the result of isothermal crystallization measurement showed that the crystallization half-time of 7 wt% zinc lactate nucleated PLLA decreased from 2359.91 s to 152.68 s at 115°C [15].Recently, the metal phenylphosphonate was also introduced into PLLA matrix to promote its crystallization performance [16–18]. Pan et al. [17] reported that the addition of 0.02 wt% layered zinc phenylphosphonate could make PLLA finish crystallization at high cooling rate (10°C/min). Furthermore, with further increasing of zinc phenylphosphonate concentration, the crystallization rate also increased. The comparative study on nucleating ability of three metal phenylphosphonates including zinc phenylphosphonate, barium phenylphosphonate, and calcium phenylphosphonate was investigated by Wang and his colleagues [18]. And the nucleating ability for PLLA was as the following order: zinc phenylphosphonate > calcium phenylphosphonate > barium phenylphosphonate. However, as far as we know, there is no report of the effect of layered strontium phenylphosphonate on the performance of PLLA. Meantime, it is very necessary to develop more metal phenylphosphonates to confirm the nucleation mechanism of metal phenylphosphonate for PLLA. Thus, in this work, the layered strontium phenylphosphonate was synthesized through phenylphosphinic acid and strontium chloride; then the crystallization behavior and thermal stability of PLLA incorporation of the layered strontium phenylphosphonate were investigated using DSC, XRD, and TGA. This work is of interest to develop more PLLA composites modified by inorganic/organic hybrid material.


## 2. Experimental Section

### 2.1. Materials

Poly(L-lactic acid) (2002D) was purchased from Nature Works LLC, USA. The phenylphosphinic acid was obtained from Shanghai Danxi Chemical Science & Technology Co., Ltd., China. The strontium chloride and sodium hydroxide were supplied by Chongqing Chuandong Chemical (Group) Co., Ltd., China.


### 2.2. Synthesis of Strontium Phenylphosphonate (SrP)

The phenylphosphinic acid was dissolved in water with stirring, the strontium chloride aqueous solution was slowly added into the phenylphosphinic acid solution, and then pH of the mixture solution was adjusted to 5-6 using 0.1 mol/L sodium hydroxide. The mixture solution was filtrated, and the filtrate was stirred at 50°C to achieve the full crystallization, followed by filtrating again. The resultant product was washed by methanol and deionized water for 3 times, respectively. Finally, the strontium phenylphosphonate (SrP) was dried in vacuum at 45°C.


### 2.3. Preparation of PLLA/SrP Sample

The preparation of PLLA modified by SrP was performed in torque rheometer, and the melt processed procedure is the following: PLLA and SrP were blended with a rotation speed of 32 rpm for 7 min at 180°C and at 64 rpm for 7 min at 180°C. Then the PLLA/SrP samples were hot pressed and cool pressed for 7 min, respectively.


### 2.4. Testing

#### 2.4.1. Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC)

The nonisothermal crystallization behaviors of the neat PLLA and PLLA/SrP samples were measured through differential scanning calorimeter (Q2000, TA instrument, USA). The measured samples were firstly heated to the set melting temperature (180°C) for 3 min and then cooled from 180°C to 40°C at different cooling rate. Finally, the samples were heated to 180°C again at a heating rate of 10°C/min, and the relevant nonisothermal crystallization data were recorded to further analysis.


#### 2.4.2. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD measurements of layered SrP and PLLA/SrP samples after different conditions were operated on a diffractometer (XRD6000, Shimadzu, Japan) at room temperature with scanning rate of 2°/min.


#### 2.4.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

The thermal stability of the SrP, PLLA, and PLLA with different concentration of SrP was recorded using a thermal analyzer (Q500, TA instrument, USA) under 60 mL/min air flow from room temperature to 650°C.


#### 2.4.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The morphology of the layered SrP was observed by scanning electron microscopy (XL-30 ESEM FEG, Philips, Holland) in 15–20 kV accelerating voltage (Tungsten filament).


## 2.1. Materials

Poly(L-lactic acid) (2002D) was purchased from Nature Works LLC, USA. The phenylphosphinic acid was obtained from Shanghai Danxi Chemical Science & Technology Co., Ltd., China. The strontium chloride and sodium hydroxide were supplied by Chongqing Chuandong Chemical (Group) Co., Ltd., China.


## 2.2. Synthesis of Strontium Phenylphosphonate (SrP)

The phenylphosphinic acid was dissolved in water with stirring, the strontium chloride aqueous solution was slowly added into the phenylphosphinic acid solution, and then pH of the mixture solution was adjusted to 5-6 using 0.1 mol/L sodium hydroxide. The mixture solution was filtrated, and the filtrate was stirred at 50°C to achieve the full crystallization, followed by filtrating again. The resultant product was washed by methanol and deionized water for 3 times, respectively. Finally, the strontium phenylphosphonate (SrP) was dried in vacuum at 45°C.


## 2.3. Preparation of PLLA/SrP Sample

The preparation of PLLA modified by SrP was performed in torque rheometer, and the melt processed procedure is the following: PLLA and SrP were blended with a rotation speed of 32 rpm for 7 min at 180°C and at 64 rpm for 7 min at 180°C. Then the PLLA/SrP samples were hot pressed and cool pressed for 7 min, respectively.


## 2.4. Testing

### 2.4.1. Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC)

The nonisothermal crystallization behaviors of the neat PLLA and PLLA/SrP samples were measured through differential scanning calorimeter (Q2000, TA instrument, USA). The measured samples were firstly heated to the set melting temperature (180°C) for 3 min and then cooled from 180°C to 40°C at different cooling rate. Finally, the samples were heated to 180°C again at a heating rate of 10°C/min, and the relevant nonisothermal crystallization data were recorded to further analysis.


### 2.4.2. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD measurements of layered SrP and PLLA/SrP samples after different conditions were operated on a diffractometer (XRD6000, Shimadzu, Japan) at room temperature with scanning rate of 2°/min.


### 2.4.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

The thermal stability of the SrP, PLLA, and PLLA with different concentration of SrP was recorded using a thermal analyzer (Q500, TA instrument, USA) under 60 mL/min air flow from room temperature to 650°C.


### 2.4.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The morphology of the layered SrP was observed by scanning electron microscopy (XL-30 ESEM FEG, Philips, Holland) in 15–20 kV accelerating voltage (Tungsten filament).


## 2.4.1. Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC)

The nonisothermal crystallization behaviors of the neat PLLA and PLLA/SrP samples were measured through differential scanning calorimeter (Q2000, TA instrument, USA). The measured samples were firstly heated to the set melting temperature (180°C) for 3 min and then cooled from 180°C to 40°C at different cooling rate. Finally, the samples were heated to 180°C again at a heating rate of 10°C/min, and the relevant nonisothermal crystallization data were recorded to further analysis.


## 2.4.2. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD measurements of layered SrP and PLLA/SrP samples after different conditions were operated on a diffractometer (XRD6000, Shimadzu, Japan) at room temperature with scanning rate of 2°/min.


## 2.4.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

The thermal stability of the SrP, PLLA, and PLLA with different concentration of SrP was recorded using a thermal analyzer (Q500, TA instrument, USA) under 60 mL/min air flow from room temperature to 650°C.


## 2.4.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The morphology of the layered SrP was observed by scanning electron microscopy (XL-30 ESEM FEG, Philips, Holland) in 15–20 kV accelerating voltage (Tungsten filament).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Structure of SrP

Figure1 presents the XRD pattern of aforementioned synthesized SrP. It is easily found that the XRD pattern of SrP is in good agreement with reported result [19], demonstrating the successful preparation of SrP. And the characteristic and strongest diffraction peak of SrP in Figure 1 appears at 2θ=5.68°, belonging to the (010) plane reflection. The relevant interlayer spacing d010 of SrP is 1.555 nm, indicating that the phenyl exists in the interlamellar region beyond that of the phosphate group [17].Figure 1
XRD of SrP.The study of the morphology is of great importance to understand the structure arrangement of SrP and evaluate the effect of SrP on performance of the primary PLLA. Therefore, the morphology of SrP was observed through SEM. As shown in Figures2(a) and 2(b), the SrP exhibits type layered structure similar to layered silicates and other layered metal phenylphosphonate including lanthanum phenylphosphonate [8], calcium phenylphosphonate [5], and barium phenylphosphonate [20]. And it is also clearly observed from the enlarged images (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)) that this layered structure is formed by many lamellae with thickness of about 6 nm, and these lamellae are in favor of promoting the crystallization of the pristine PLLA [21]. Besides, the high decomposition temperature of SrP in the following text further suggests the possibility of SrP for serving as nucleating agent for accelerating the crystallization of PLLA.Figure 2
SEM of SrP.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.2. Nonisothermal Crystallization

The heat resistance and practical process of semicrystalline polymer primarily depend on the crystallization behavior. In particular, the study of nonisothermal crystallization behavior is more valuable for practical application. Figure3 is the nonisothermal crystallization curves of the pristine PLLA and PLLA with different concentration of SrP from melt at a cooling rate of 1°C/min. As for the pristine PLLA, the crystallization peak is negligible under this nonisothermal crystallization condition owing to the poor crystallization ability. However, in the case of all PLLA/SrP samples, the sharp nonisothermal crystallization peaks appear in nonisothermal crystallization procedure, indicating the advanced crystallization accelerated ability of SrP for PLLA. On the other hand, it is a distinct fact that the effect of SrP concentration on the nonisothermal crystallization is very weak through the DSC data analysis (see Table 1). When SrP concentration is from 0.3 wt% to 1.5 wt%, the onset crystallization temperature (To), the crystallization peak temperature (Tcp), and the nonisothermal crystallization enthalpy (ΔHc) exhibit slight increase, and at 1 wt% loading of the layered SrP, the To and Tcp have the largest value of 117.1°C and 110.1°C, respectively. But 0.7 wt% SrP makes the PLLA obtain the largest ΔHc 31.0 J·g−1. This slight effect of the SrP concentration on the crystallization behavior of PLLA shows that a small amount of SrP can achieve the dramatic enhancement of PLLA crystallization rate, indicating that layered SrP is a potential candidate for use in rapid prototyping modified PLLA materials. In addition, because the pristine PLLA almost cannot show the crystallization peak during both nonisothermal crystallization and the second heating procedure, the melting peak almost cannot be observed in the second heating process, whereas all PLLA/SrP samples have the obvious melting peaks, and the PLLA/1% SrP exhibits the highest melting temperature 146.9°C. Meantime, the higher cooling rate (above 5°C/min) cannot make PLLA form crystal (see Figure 4), resulting from the competition relevance between accelerated crystallization of SrP and retarded crystallization of cooling rate.Table 1
DSC data of PLLA and PLLA/SrP samples at a cooling rate of 1°C/min.
Sample
Rate/°C/min
T
o/°C
T
c
p/°C
Δ
H
c/J·g−1
T
m/°C
PLLA
1
101.4
94.5
0.1
—
PLLA/0.3% SrP
1
111.6
107.1
30.7
145.8
PLLA/0.7% SrP
1
116.3
109.4
31.0
146.2
PLLA/1% SrP
1
117.1
110.1
30.6
146.9
PLLA/1.5% SrP
1
116.9
110.1
30.4
146.8Figure 3
DSC curves of PLLA and PLLA/SrP samples at a cooling rate of 1°C/min.Figure 4
DSC curves of PLLA/0.5% SrP at the different cooling rate.The different nonisothermal crystallization behavior will directly affect the glass transition temperature (Tg) in the second heating procedure. Figure 5 shows Tg of the pristine PLLA and PLLA containing 1 wt% SrP at a heating rate of 10°C/min after nonisothermal crystallization. It is observed that PLLA/1% SrP presents higher Tg than the pristine PLLA. The reason is that the incorporation of SrP makes PLLA form more regular structure in cooling crystallization, and these regular structures firstly need to be destroyed before the glass transition of PLLA occurs, resulting in the increase of Tg from 56.5°C to 59.6°C. The similar result also can be observed in PLLA/N,N,N′-tris(1H-benzotriazole) trimesinic acid acethydrazide system [10].Figure 5
T
g of PLLA and PLLA/1% SrP after nonisothermal crystallization.


### 3.3. XRD Analysis

XRD is the other important measurement method to evaluate the crystallization behavior of semicrystalline polymer. Usually, the higher the crystallinity is, the more intensity the diffraction peak exhibits. Figure6 is the XRD curves of the pristine PLLA and PLLA/SrP after melt processed procedure. It is obvious that the intensity of the characteristic diffraction peak of SrP gradually increases with the increase of SrP concentration in PLLA matrix, but PLLA and PLLA/SrP still exhibit the flat and broad diffraction peaks; the possible reason is that a small amount of crystal of PLLA or PLLA/SrP could not form at quite high cooling rate, and the cooling rate is the key factor determining the crystallization behavior of PLLA under this condition.Figure 6
XRD curves of PLLA and PLLA/SrP after melting blend.However, PLLA/SrP samples exhibit different XRD curves after nonisothermal crystallization at a cooling rate of 1°C/min (see Figure7). Though the diffraction peak of the pristine PLLA is still flat and broad, the diffraction peaks of PLLA/SrP samples become very sharp, and the characteristic diffraction peaks from the (110) plane and (203) plane appear at 2θ=16.7° and 19.0°, respectively [22]; this difference further evidenced that SrP is very effective crystallization accelerator. Similarly, the intensity of diffraction peak of SrP strengthens with the increase of SrP concentration, but PLLA/SrP samples do not exhibit the regular change, and the PLLA/1.5% SrP has the weakest diffraction peak compared with other PLLA/SrP samples, indicating that excess SrP is a powerful inhibitor for PLLA crystallization. In contrast, PLLA/0.7% SrP and PLLA/1% SrP exhibit the stronger diffraction peak, showing that 0.7 wt% to 1 wt% is the optimum concentration range to achieve advanced nucleating effect.Figure 7
XRD curves of PLLA and PLLA/SrP after nonisothermal crystallization.


### 3.4. Thermal Stability

Thermal stability is the key research index to achieve and broaden practical application. Figure8 is the TGA curves of SrP, PLLA, and PLLA/SrP at the heating rate of 5°C/min under 60 mL/min air. As seen in Figure 8, the onset thermal decomposition temperature of SrP is much higher than that of PLLA and PLLA/SrP, showing that SrP has good thermal stability during melting blend of PLLA with SrP, which is one of the prerequisites for SrP to serve as a nucleating agent for PLLA. And the onset decomposition temperatures of PLLA, PLLA/0.1% SrP, PLLA/0.3% SrP, PLLA/0.7% SrP, PLLA/1% SrP, and PLLA/1.5% SrP are 341.1°C, 336.2°C, 334.2°C, 334.7°C, 335.3°C, and 335.4°C, respectively, showing that the introduction of SrP causes the onset decomposition temperature of the PLLA to decrease. Moreover, apart from 0.1% SrP, the SrP concentration has no discernible effect on the onset thermal decomposition temperature of the PLLA. In addition, PLLA/SrP, as PLLA, exhibits one stage during thermal decomposition, indicating the relevant SrP concentration cannot change the thermal decomposition behavior of the pure PLLA.Figure 8
TGA curves of SrP, PLLA, and PLLA/SrP.


## 3.1. Structure of SrP

Figure1 presents the XRD pattern of aforementioned synthesized SrP. It is easily found that the XRD pattern of SrP is in good agreement with reported result [19], demonstrating the successful preparation of SrP. And the characteristic and strongest diffraction peak of SrP in Figure 1 appears at 2θ=5.68°, belonging to the (010) plane reflection. The relevant interlayer spacing d010 of SrP is 1.555 nm, indicating that the phenyl exists in the interlamellar region beyond that of the phosphate group [17].Figure 1
XRD of SrP.The study of the morphology is of great importance to understand the structure arrangement of SrP and evaluate the effect of SrP on performance of the primary PLLA. Therefore, the morphology of SrP was observed through SEM. As shown in Figures2(a) and 2(b), the SrP exhibits type layered structure similar to layered silicates and other layered metal phenylphosphonate including lanthanum phenylphosphonate [8], calcium phenylphosphonate [5], and barium phenylphosphonate [20]. And it is also clearly observed from the enlarged images (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)) that this layered structure is formed by many lamellae with thickness of about 6 nm, and these lamellae are in favor of promoting the crystallization of the pristine PLLA [21]. Besides, the high decomposition temperature of SrP in the following text further suggests the possibility of SrP for serving as nucleating agent for accelerating the crystallization of PLLA.Figure 2
SEM of SrP.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.2. Nonisothermal Crystallization

The heat resistance and practical process of semicrystalline polymer primarily depend on the crystallization behavior. In particular, the study of nonisothermal crystallization behavior is more valuable for practical application. Figure3 is the nonisothermal crystallization curves of the pristine PLLA and PLLA with different concentration of SrP from melt at a cooling rate of 1°C/min. As for the pristine PLLA, the crystallization peak is negligible under this nonisothermal crystallization condition owing to the poor crystallization ability. However, in the case of all PLLA/SrP samples, the sharp nonisothermal crystallization peaks appear in nonisothermal crystallization procedure, indicating the advanced crystallization accelerated ability of SrP for PLLA. On the other hand, it is a distinct fact that the effect of SrP concentration on the nonisothermal crystallization is very weak through the DSC data analysis (see Table 1). When SrP concentration is from 0.3 wt% to 1.5 wt%, the onset crystallization temperature (To), the crystallization peak temperature (Tcp), and the nonisothermal crystallization enthalpy (ΔHc) exhibit slight increase, and at 1 wt% loading of the layered SrP, the To and Tcp have the largest value of 117.1°C and 110.1°C, respectively. But 0.7 wt% SrP makes the PLLA obtain the largest ΔHc 31.0 J·g−1. This slight effect of the SrP concentration on the crystallization behavior of PLLA shows that a small amount of SrP can achieve the dramatic enhancement of PLLA crystallization rate, indicating that layered SrP is a potential candidate for use in rapid prototyping modified PLLA materials. In addition, because the pristine PLLA almost cannot show the crystallization peak during both nonisothermal crystallization and the second heating procedure, the melting peak almost cannot be observed in the second heating process, whereas all PLLA/SrP samples have the obvious melting peaks, and the PLLA/1% SrP exhibits the highest melting temperature 146.9°C. Meantime, the higher cooling rate (above 5°C/min) cannot make PLLA form crystal (see Figure 4), resulting from the competition relevance between accelerated crystallization of SrP and retarded crystallization of cooling rate.Table 1
DSC data of PLLA and PLLA/SrP samples at a cooling rate of 1°C/min.
Sample
Rate/°C/min
T
o/°C
T
c
p/°C
Δ
H
c/J·g−1
T
m/°C
PLLA
1
101.4
94.5
0.1
—
PLLA/0.3% SrP
1
111.6
107.1
30.7
145.8
PLLA/0.7% SrP
1
116.3
109.4
31.0
146.2
PLLA/1% SrP
1
117.1
110.1
30.6
146.9
PLLA/1.5% SrP
1
116.9
110.1
30.4
146.8Figure 3
DSC curves of PLLA and PLLA/SrP samples at a cooling rate of 1°C/min.Figure 4
DSC curves of PLLA/0.5% SrP at the different cooling rate.The different nonisothermal crystallization behavior will directly affect the glass transition temperature (Tg) in the second heating procedure. Figure 5 shows Tg of the pristine PLLA and PLLA containing 1 wt% SrP at a heating rate of 10°C/min after nonisothermal crystallization. It is observed that PLLA/1% SrP presents higher Tg than the pristine PLLA. The reason is that the incorporation of SrP makes PLLA form more regular structure in cooling crystallization, and these regular structures firstly need to be destroyed before the glass transition of PLLA occurs, resulting in the increase of Tg from 56.5°C to 59.6°C. The similar result also can be observed in PLLA/N,N,N′-tris(1H-benzotriazole) trimesinic acid acethydrazide system [10].Figure 5
T
g of PLLA and PLLA/1% SrP after nonisothermal crystallization.


## 3.3. XRD Analysis

XRD is the other important measurement method to evaluate the crystallization behavior of semicrystalline polymer. Usually, the higher the crystallinity is, the more intensity the diffraction peak exhibits. Figure6 is the XRD curves of the pristine PLLA and PLLA/SrP after melt processed procedure. It is obvious that the intensity of the characteristic diffraction peak of SrP gradually increases with the increase of SrP concentration in PLLA matrix, but PLLA and PLLA/SrP still exhibit the flat and broad diffraction peaks; the possible reason is that a small amount of crystal of PLLA or PLLA/SrP could not form at quite high cooling rate, and the cooling rate is the key factor determining the crystallization behavior of PLLA under this condition.Figure 6
XRD curves of PLLA and PLLA/SrP after melting blend.However, PLLA/SrP samples exhibit different XRD curves after nonisothermal crystallization at a cooling rate of 1°C/min (see Figure7). Though the diffraction peak of the pristine PLLA is still flat and broad, the diffraction peaks of PLLA/SrP samples become very sharp, and the characteristic diffraction peaks from the (110) plane and (203) plane appear at 2θ=16.7° and 19.0°, respectively [22]; this difference further evidenced that SrP is very effective crystallization accelerator. Similarly, the intensity of diffraction peak of SrP strengthens with the increase of SrP concentration, but PLLA/SrP samples do not exhibit the regular change, and the PLLA/1.5% SrP has the weakest diffraction peak compared with other PLLA/SrP samples, indicating that excess SrP is a powerful inhibitor for PLLA crystallization. In contrast, PLLA/0.7% SrP and PLLA/1% SrP exhibit the stronger diffraction peak, showing that 0.7 wt% to 1 wt% is the optimum concentration range to achieve advanced nucleating effect.Figure 7
XRD curves of PLLA and PLLA/SrP after nonisothermal crystallization.


## 3.4. Thermal Stability

Thermal stability is the key research index to achieve and broaden practical application. Figure8 is the TGA curves of SrP, PLLA, and PLLA/SrP at the heating rate of 5°C/min under 60 mL/min air. As seen in Figure 8, the onset thermal decomposition temperature of SrP is much higher than that of PLLA and PLLA/SrP, showing that SrP has good thermal stability during melting blend of PLLA with SrP, which is one of the prerequisites for SrP to serve as a nucleating agent for PLLA. And the onset decomposition temperatures of PLLA, PLLA/0.1% SrP, PLLA/0.3% SrP, PLLA/0.7% SrP, PLLA/1% SrP, and PLLA/1.5% SrP are 341.1°C, 336.2°C, 334.2°C, 334.7°C, 335.3°C, and 335.4°C, respectively, showing that the introduction of SrP causes the onset decomposition temperature of the PLLA to decrease. Moreover, apart from 0.1% SrP, the SrP concentration has no discernible effect on the onset thermal decomposition temperature of the PLLA. In addition, PLLA/SrP, as PLLA, exhibits one stage during thermal decomposition, indicating the relevant SrP concentration cannot change the thermal decomposition behavior of the pure PLLA.Figure 8
TGA curves of SrP, PLLA, and PLLA/SrP.


## 4. Conclusion

Layered SrP was synthesized to investigate its influence on the nonisothermal crystallization and thermal stability of PLLA. The relevant results showed that layered SrP could serve as a crystallization accelerated agent for PLLA, and compared to the neat PLLA, 1 wt% SrP made theTo and Tcp increase from 101.4°C and 94.5°C to 117.1°C and 110.1°C, respectively, and 0.7 wt% SrP caused ΔHc to give rise to an increase from 0.1 J·g−1 to 31.0 J·g−1. The increase of Tg and difference of XRD curves also further confirmed the enhancement effect of SrP to PLLA crystallization. In addition, the cooling rate could significantly affect the crystallization behavior of PLLA. Thermal decomposition showed that the addition of SrP could decrease the onset decomposition temperature of the pure PLLA, but the influence of SrP concentration on the thermal decomposition behavior of PLLA is negligible.



---

*Source: 3926876-2016-05-22.xml*