# Experimental Study of Phase Composition of B-Fe-Mn-V Alloys and Thermodynamic Calculations of Phase Equilibria in the B-Mn-V and B-Fe-Mn-V Systems

Authors: Viera Homolová; Ján Kepič; Adéla Zemanová; Ondřej Zobač
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Phase compositions of B-Fe-Mn-V alloys were studied by several experimental methods (DTA measurement, X-ray diffractions, and scanning electron microscopy). Besides the experimental study of the quaternary system, thermodynamic modelling of the ternary B-Mn-V system by the Calphad method and thermodynamic calculations for the quaternary B-Fe-Mn-V system were performed. Calculations for the quaternary system are based on the ternary subsystems (B-Mn-V, B-Fe-V, B-Fe-Mn, and Fe-Mn-V). Boron is modelled as an interstitial element in all solid solutions of vanadium, manganese, and iron. Very good agreement between experimental results and thermodynamic calculations was achieved. The created thermodynamic database is suitable for thermodynamic calculations of phase diagrams for all the ternary subsystems and also for the B-Fe-Mn-V quaternary system.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The study of the quaternary system B-Fe-Mn-V and its ternary subsystems from the view of phase equilibria is important in several fields of materials research. The systems are the parts of advanced materials for energy industry [1–3]. Boron increases hardenability of steels; vanadium forms stable borides with high melting temperature, hardness, and wear resistance; and manganese improves the strength and toughness of metallic materials. Information about the system is also important for the study of boride coatings on various alloys and metals, including iron [4].Up to now, the B-V-Mn system was experimentally studied only by Telegus and Kuzma [5]. They constructed the isothermal section at 1073 K. However, no thermodynamic description of the ternary system was found in their work and also in other literature. Thermodynamic descriptions of the B-Fe-V and B-Fe-Mn systems are given in our previous works [6, 7]. Neither theoretical nor experimental phase diagram information was found in the literature for the quaternary B-Fe-Mn-V system.The present work is focused on an experimental study of phase composition of the B-Fe-Mn-V alloys and thermodynamic calculations of phase equilibria in the B-Fe-Mn-V quaternary system. The thermodynamic calculations are based on ternary subsystems. Therefore, thermodynamic modelling of the ternary B-Mn-V system by the Calphad method was also done in the scope of this work. Besides the study of the B-Fe-Mn-V phase diagram, the aim of this work is the verification of the database based on ternary systems (B-Mn-V, B-Fe-V, B-Fe-Mn, and Fe-Mn-V) for calculations of the quaternary system.


## 2. Materials and Methods

Three quaternary model B-Fe-Mn-V alloys were produced from high-purity powders of B (99.9%), Fe (99.98%), Mn (99.98%), and V (99.8%) bought from Alfa Aesar Company (Germany). Powders were mixed and pressed into cylindrical pellets and subsequently melted. The melting was carried out in an argon arc furnace on a water-cooled copper plate in the argon atmosphere of 99.999% purity. The solidified alloys were remelted several times in order to achieve good homogeneity. The final chemical compositions of the produced alloys (7 g) are shown in Table1. The alloys were then sealed in evacuated silica glass tubes and annealed in the furnace (LAC, Czech Republic) at 900 K for 2040 h. After the annealing, the samples were quenched into cold water.Table 1
Chemical composition of alloys and their phase composition after annealing.
Alloy
Composition (at %)
Phase composition at 900 K
1
40B-45Fe-5Mn-10V
M2B, MB, V3B4
2
5B-70Fe-5Mn-20V
BCC,σ, VB
3
2B-90Fe-5Mn-3V
BCC, M2BThe annealed material was studied by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy JEOL JSM-7000F (JEOL, Japan) equipped with a “thermal FEG” and an INCA EDX analyzer. The backscattered electron image mode of scanning electron microscopy was used to study the alloy microstructure.For X-ray diffraction, the powder of the samples was prepared by a smooth file and homogenized in a steel mortar. X-ray powder diffraction analyses were performed by a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker, USA) in Bragg–Brentano pseudofocusing geometry, using Cu-Kα radiation and a LynxEye® one-dimensional silicon strip detector.Also, DTA (differential thermal analysis) measurements of nonannealed alloy were performed on the apparatus Netzsch DSC 404C (Netzsch, Germany). Pieces of the sample weighing 200–400 mg were sealed in evacuated quartz glass crucibles. Heating and cooling curves were recorded for the sample using a scanning rate of 5 K·min−1. The DTA instrument was calibrated at the melting points of high-purity In, Sn, Sb, Zn, Ag, and Al sealed in quartz crucibles to establish an internal calibration file.


## 3. Thermodynamic Model and Calculations

Thermodynamic calculations of the B-Fe-Mn-V system were based on data for ternary subsystems. Data for B-Fe-X systems were taken from our previous works. The paper [6] was a source of data for the B-Fe-V system. Data for the B-Fe-Mn system were taken from the literature [7]. Data for the Fe-Mn-V system were taken from the private steel database [8], and the data are shown in Table 2. Data for the last ternary system were not found in any literature, and only one experimental work [5] was found for the B-V-Mn system. The experimental work [5], which described an isothermal section at 1073 K after annealing for 1200 h, was used for modelling the ternary system. Data for pure elements were taken from the work [9]. For all the calculations, Thermo-Calc software was used [10].Table 2
Thermodynamic parameters for the Fe-Mn-V system from the work [8].
Phase
Parameters
σ
G
0(Fe : V : Mn) = 8GFEFCC + 4GVBCC + 18∗GHSERMN − 200000
G
0(Mn : V : Fe) = 8GMNFCC + 4GVBCC + 18GFEBCC − 150000;
L
0(V : Mn, V) = −100000
L
0(V : FE, V; 0) = −300000
FCC
L
0(Fe, Mn : Va) = −7762 + 3.865T
L
1(Fe, Mn : Va) = −259
BCC
L
0(Fe, Mn : Va) = −2759 + 1.237T
α-Mn
G(V : Va) = GVBCC + 9000
L
0(Fe, Mn : Va) = −10184
L
0(Mn, V : Va; 0) = −22225
β-Mn
G(V : Va) = GVBCC + 10000
L
0(Fe, Mn : Va; 0) = −11518 + 2.819T
L
0(Mn, V : Va) = −17724


### 3.1. Thermodynamic Models for Solid Solutions and Liquid

The sublattice model developed by Hillert and Staffansson [11] was used in the present work to describe the Gibbs energy of the individual phases. Boron was considered as an interstitial element.The Gibbs energies of the BCC, FCC, CBCC, and CUB solid solutions in the system are described using the two-sublattice model. Metallic elements occupy the first sublattice, and vacancy (Va) and boron occupy the second (interstitial) sublattice. The Gibbs energy for the two-sublattice model Fe,Mn,VaB,Vac can be expressed as follows:(1)GSS=ΣiyiyiGi:B0+yVaGi:Va0+aRTΣiyilnyi+cRTyBlnyB+yValnyVa+Σi,jyiyjyBLi,j:B+yVaLi,j:Va+yByVaΣiyiLi:B,Va+yByVaΣi,jyiyjLi,j:B,Va+yFeyMnyVyVayBLFe,Mn,V:B,Va+Gmag.,i,j=Fe,Mn,V.In (1), y represents the site fraction of the component i in the relevant sublattice. The symbols a and c are stoichiometric coefficients of each sublattice (for BCC: a=1 and c=3; for FCC, CBCC, and CUB: a=c=1). Gi:Va0 is the Gibbs energy of a pure element i in the phase and Gi:B0 is the Gibbs energy of a hypothetical nonmagnetic boride, where the element i occupies the first sublattice and all the interstitial positions are occupied by boron.All values ofG are given relative to the standard element reference (SER) state, that is defined as the stable state of the element under standard conditions (298.15 K and 105 Pa). Interaction parameters L are expressed by the Redlich–Kister polynomial [12]:(2)Li,j:l=∑v=0nLi,j:lvyi−yjv.The interaction parametersLi:l,m, Li,j:l,m, and Li,j,k:l,m (where i,j,k=Fe,Mn,Vandl,m=B,Va) are defined analogically.The temperature dependence of theLv parameter is expressed as follows:(3)Li,j:l,mv=A+BT.G
mag
. in (1) is the magnetic contribution to the Gibbs energy. Its value is calculated according to the model of Hillert and Jarl [13].The liquid phase is described by a single sublattice. Its Gibbs energy is described as follows:(4)GLiquid=ΣixiGi0+RTΣixilnxi+Σi,jxixjLi,j+Σi,j,kxixjxkLi,j,k+Σi,j,k,lxixjxkxlLi,j,k,l,i,j,k,l=B,Fe,Mn,V.Theβ-rhombohedral B phase (βB) is modelled using one sublattice with the formula (B,Mn). The following expression described the Gibbs energy of the phase:(5)GβB=ΣiyiGi+RTΣiyilnyi+yByMnLB,Mn,i=B,Mn.


### 3.2. Thermodynamic Model for Borides

All borides are described as stoichiometric phases with two sublatticesFe,Mn,VaBc. The Gibbs energy is given as follows:(6)GBorid=ΣiyiGi:B0+aRT∑iyilnyi+cRTln1+yiyjLi,j:B+yFeyMnyVyBLFe,Mn,V:B,i,j=Fe,Mn,V.


### 3.3. Thermodynamic Model forσ-Phase

The phase is described with the three-sublattice model with the formulaFe,Mn8V4B,Fe,Mn,V18. Its Gibbs energy is given as follows:(7)Gσ=ΣiyFeIyVIIyiIIIGFe:V:i0+ΣiyMnIyVIIyiIIIGMn:V:i0+8RTΣkykIlnykI+4RTyVIIlnyVII+18RTΣiyiIIIlnyiIII+ΣkΣiΣjykIyVIIyiIIIyjIIILk:V:i,j+ΣiyFeIyMnIyVIIyiIIILFe,Mn:V:i+ΣiΣjyFeIyMnIyVIIyiIIIyjIIILFe,Mn:V:i,j+ΣkΣiΣjΣlykIyVIIyiIIIyjIIIylIIILk:V:i,j,l+ΣiΣjΣlyFeIyMnIyVIIyiIIIyjIIIylIIILFe,Mn:V:i,j,l+ΣkykIyVIIyBIIIyFeIIIyMnIIIyVIIILk:V:B,Fe,Mn,V+yFeIyMnIyVIIyBIIIyFeIIIyMnIIIyVIIILFe,Mn:V:B,Fe,Mn,V,i,j,l=B,Fe,Mn,Vwithi≠j≠l,k=Fe,Mn,where numbers I, II, and III denote the sublattice.


## 3.1. Thermodynamic Models for Solid Solutions and Liquid

The sublattice model developed by Hillert and Staffansson [11] was used in the present work to describe the Gibbs energy of the individual phases. Boron was considered as an interstitial element.The Gibbs energies of the BCC, FCC, CBCC, and CUB solid solutions in the system are described using the two-sublattice model. Metallic elements occupy the first sublattice, and vacancy (Va) and boron occupy the second (interstitial) sublattice. The Gibbs energy for the two-sublattice model Fe,Mn,VaB,Vac can be expressed as follows:(1)GSS=ΣiyiyiGi:B0+yVaGi:Va0+aRTΣiyilnyi+cRTyBlnyB+yValnyVa+Σi,jyiyjyBLi,j:B+yVaLi,j:Va+yByVaΣiyiLi:B,Va+yByVaΣi,jyiyjLi,j:B,Va+yFeyMnyVyVayBLFe,Mn,V:B,Va+Gmag.,i,j=Fe,Mn,V.In (1), y represents the site fraction of the component i in the relevant sublattice. The symbols a and c are stoichiometric coefficients of each sublattice (for BCC: a=1 and c=3; for FCC, CBCC, and CUB: a=c=1). Gi:Va0 is the Gibbs energy of a pure element i in the phase and Gi:B0 is the Gibbs energy of a hypothetical nonmagnetic boride, where the element i occupies the first sublattice and all the interstitial positions are occupied by boron.All values ofG are given relative to the standard element reference (SER) state, that is defined as the stable state of the element under standard conditions (298.15 K and 105 Pa). Interaction parameters L are expressed by the Redlich–Kister polynomial [12]:(2)Li,j:l=∑v=0nLi,j:lvyi−yjv.The interaction parametersLi:l,m, Li,j:l,m, and Li,j,k:l,m (where i,j,k=Fe,Mn,Vandl,m=B,Va) are defined analogically.The temperature dependence of theLv parameter is expressed as follows:(3)Li,j:l,mv=A+BT.G
mag
. in (1) is the magnetic contribution to the Gibbs energy. Its value is calculated according to the model of Hillert and Jarl [13].The liquid phase is described by a single sublattice. Its Gibbs energy is described as follows:(4)GLiquid=ΣixiGi0+RTΣixilnxi+Σi,jxixjLi,j+Σi,j,kxixjxkLi,j,k+Σi,j,k,lxixjxkxlLi,j,k,l,i,j,k,l=B,Fe,Mn,V.Theβ-rhombohedral B phase (βB) is modelled using one sublattice with the formula (B,Mn). The following expression described the Gibbs energy of the phase:(5)GβB=ΣiyiGi+RTΣiyilnyi+yByMnLB,Mn,i=B,Mn.


## 3.2. Thermodynamic Model for Borides

All borides are described as stoichiometric phases with two sublatticesFe,Mn,VaBc. The Gibbs energy is given as follows:(6)GBorid=ΣiyiGi:B0+aRT∑iyilnyi+cRTln1+yiyjLi,j:B+yFeyMnyVyBLFe,Mn,V:B,i,j=Fe,Mn,V.


## 3.3. Thermodynamic Model forσ-Phase

The phase is described with the three-sublattice model with the formulaFe,Mn8V4B,Fe,Mn,V18. Its Gibbs energy is given as follows:(7)Gσ=ΣiyFeIyVIIyiIIIGFe:V:i0+ΣiyMnIyVIIyiIIIGMn:V:i0+8RTΣkykIlnykI+4RTyVIIlnyVII+18RTΣiyiIIIlnyiIII+ΣkΣiΣjykIyVIIyiIIIyjIIILk:V:i,j+ΣiyFeIyMnIyVIIyiIIILFe,Mn:V:i+ΣiΣjyFeIyMnIyVIIyiIIIyjIIILFe,Mn:V:i,j+ΣkΣiΣjΣlykIyVIIyiIIIyjIIIylIIILk:V:i,j,l+ΣiΣjΣlyFeIyMnIyVIIyiIIIyjIIIylIIILFe,Mn:V:i,j,l+ΣkykIyVIIyBIIIyFeIIIyMnIIIyVIIILk:V:B,Fe,Mn,V+yFeIyMnIyVIIyBIIIyFeIIIyMnIIIyVIIILFe,Mn:V:B,Fe,Mn,V,i,j,l=B,Fe,Mn,Vwithi≠j≠l,k=Fe,Mn,where numbers I, II, and III denote the sublattice.


## 4. Results and Discussion

### 4.1. B-Mn-V Ternary System

Modelling of the system is based on the same binary data as modelling other ternary subsystems [6, 7] of the studied quaternary system and mentioned experimental work [5]. Calculated binary phase diagrams are presented in Figure 1. In the ternary system, liquid, vanadium and manganese solid solutions (BCC, FCC, CBCC, and CUB), intermetallic σ-phase, βB, five vanadium borides (V3B2, VB, V5B6, V3B4, and V2B3), six manganese borides (MnB4, MnB2, Mn3B4, MnB, and o-Mn2B), and MB2 boride were considered. MB2 boride is VB2 phase in the B-V system and MnB2 boride in the B-Mn system. The MB2 boride is equilibrium phase only for high temperatures in the B-Mn system (Figure 1(a)); however, in the B-V system, it is stable also for low temperatures (Figure 1(b)). No ternary phase was considered in the ternary system, which is conformable with the experimental work [5]. Crystallographic data of the phases are given in Table 3. Calculated isothermal sections at 973, 1073, and 1173 K are shown in Figure 2. Experimental data points from the work [5] are presented in Figure 2(b). The significant difference between the calculated phase diagram and the work of Telegus et al. [5] is the presence of the o-Mn2B phase in our calculation rather than the Mn4B phase given in the phase work [5]. The decision about the replacement of the Mn4B phase is based on the work of Tergenius [14], who studied the Mn4B phase and redefined the phase as Mn2B0.982. Very good agreement between experimental results and the modelled isothermal section at 1073 K was achieved. Thermodynamic parameters developed in the present work are given in Table 4. The set of parameters was developed to fit available experimental results at 1073 K as best as possible and also to calculate reasonable phase equilibria for lower and higher temperatures. Therefore, some parameters are temperature-dependent.Figure 1
Phase diagrams of the binary subsystems: (a) B-Mn, (b) B-V, and (c) Mn-V.
(a)
(b)
(c)Table 3
Crystallographic data of the phases.
Phase
Pearson symbol/space group
Reference
δ-Mn, α-Fe, V (BCC)
cI2/Im3m
[15]
γ-Mn, γ-Fe (FCC)
cF4/Fm3m
[15]
β-Mn (CUB)
cP20/P4132
[7]
α-Mn (CBCC)
cI58/I43m
[7]
o-Mn2B0.982
oF48/Fddd
[7]
t-Mn2B, Fe2B (M2B)
tI12/I4/mcm
[15]
MnB, FeB (MB)
oP8/Pnma
[15]
Mn3B4
oI14/Immm
[7]
MnB2, VB2 (MB2)
hP3/P6/mmm
[7]
MnB4
mC14/C2/m
[7]
β-B
hR108/R3m
[7]
V3B2
tP10/P4/mbm
[15]
VB
oC8/Cmcm
[15]
V5B6
oC22/Cmmm
[15]
V3B4
oI14/Immm
[15]
V2B3
oC8/Cmcm
[15]
σ
cP2/Pm3m
[15]
T
tP10/P4/mbm
[16]Figure 2
Calculated isothermal section of the phase diagram of the B-Mn-V system (a) at 973 K, (b) at 1073 K with experimental data points from literature [5], and (c) at 1173 K.
(a)
(b)
(c)Table 4
Thermodynamic parameters for the B-Mn-V system developed in the present work.
Phase
Parameters
M2B
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −65000
L
1(Mn, V : B) = −85000
MB
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −263490 + 130T
V3B2
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −186690
V3B4
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −310000
L
1(Mn, V : B) = 106000
L
2(Mn, V : B) = 180000
VB
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −128000
Mn3B4
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −500000
L
1(Mn, V : B) = −5000
L
2(Mn, V : B) = −10000
MB2
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −49000
L
1(Mn, V : B) = −4000
L
2(Mn, V : B) = 13540 + 12.53T
α-Mn
G
0(V : B) = GVBCC + GBβB + 2000
β-Mn
G
0(V : B) = GVBCC + GBβB + 2000The data were also used to calculate liquidus surface prediction of the system (Figure3). However, no experimental results about liquidus of the ternary system are known. So, its experimental verification was not possible at this moment.Figure 3
Liquidus projection of the B-Mn-V system.Considering no other experimental results for the system were found to be better described the B-Mn-V system, the description was used for calculations of a higher system.


### 4.2. B-Fe-Mn-V Quaternary System

Liquid, several solid solutions of metallic elements, one intermetallic phase, and lot of borides are the equilibrium phases in the quaternary system. Phases identified in the investigated alloys by experimental methods after long-term annealing are given in Table1. Borides were found in all alloys, the intermetallic σ-phase was found in alloy 2, and the BCC phase was found in iron-rich alloys.Calculations of phase equilibria for alloys are presented by isopleths (Figure4) and by mole fractions in dependence on temperature (Figure 5).Figure 4
Isopleth of the phase diagram: (a) 40B-Fe-5Mn-V and (b) 5B-Fe-5Mn-V.
(a)
(b)Figure 5
Calculated phase fractions in dependence on temperature for (a) alloy 1, (b) alloy 2, and (c) alloy 3.
(a)
(b)
(c)Microstructure of the alloy 1 is presented in Figure6. Large particles of borides are found in the alloy. There are three types of borides: M2B, MB, and V3B4. The alloy phase composition is conformable with calculation (Figures 4(a) and 5(a)). Experimentally determined chemical compositions of M2B (58Fe-5Mn-3V at %) and MB (36Fe-9V-5Mn at %) borides in the alloy are in very good agreement with the calculated values (Table 5). Experimental values of metallic elements in V3B4 are 29V-2.5Mn-11Fe at %. There are small differences between experimental and calculated values (Table 5) in the composition of V3B4 boride in the alloy.Figure 6
Microstructure of the alloy 1 after annealing with the EDX spectrum of identified phases.Table 5
Chemical composition of equilibrium phases at 900 K.
Alloy
Phases
Calculated values (at %)
1
M2B
57.3Fe-5.2Mn-4.1V
MB
38Fe-7.2V-4.8Mn
V3B4
38.2V-4.2Mn-0.5Fe
2
σ
63Fe-26V-11Mn
VB
44.6V-5.4Mn-0.01Fe
3
M2B
37.8Mn-26.8Fe-2VAlloys 2 and 3 contain significantly less boron than the alloy 1. Figure7 shows a eutectic structure of the alloy 2. The microstructure consists of the matrix and dark particles of borides. The boride particles are too small for exact determination of their chemical composition by EDX. However, the distribution of elements in the alloy (Figure 7(c)) shows that it is vanadium boride. The X-ray diffraction determined the boride as VB. The BCC phase and borides form from liquid. It is in conformance with the calculated isopleth (Figure 4(b)). The σ-phase that was determined by X-ray diffraction in the alloy forms as a secondary phase from solid phases. Very similar average atomic numbers of the σ-phase and matrix do not allow to distinguish between these phases by scanning electron microscopy because the atomic number contrast between them is negligible. It may be a reason why the σ-phase was not identified by this method. Experimentally identified phase composition of the alloy is in accordance with calculation (Figure 5(b)).Figure 7
(a) Microstructure of the alloy 2 after annealing and (b) detail and (c) distribution of vanadium in the corresponding alloy.
(a)
(b)
(c)DTA heating and cooling curves of alloy 2 show phase transformation at 1025 K (752°C) (Figure8). The experimentally determined temperature is comparable with the calculated temperature of phase transformation between BCC + σ + VB and BCC + VB (Figure 5(b)). The calculated temperature of the phase transformation is 1024 K. Based on comparison between experimental measurements and calculation, it is supposed that the peak of DTA curves at 1025 K indicates dissolution of the intermetallic σ-phase at heating, or formation of the σ-phase at cooling. There is a very good agreement between experimental measurements and calculation.Figure 8
DTA curves (two identical heating and cooling cycles) of alloy 2.The microstructure of the alloy 3 is presented in Figure9. M2B boride and BCC phase were found in the alloys after annealing. It is in accordance with calculation (Figure 5(c)).Figure 9
Microstructure of the alloy 3 after annealing.Comparison of experimental and theoretical results shows very good agreement between them. The agreement also indicates that description of the B-Mn-V ternary system modelled by using a limited number of experimental results is sufficient.


## 4.1. B-Mn-V Ternary System

Modelling of the system is based on the same binary data as modelling other ternary subsystems [6, 7] of the studied quaternary system and mentioned experimental work [5]. Calculated binary phase diagrams are presented in Figure 1. In the ternary system, liquid, vanadium and manganese solid solutions (BCC, FCC, CBCC, and CUB), intermetallic σ-phase, βB, five vanadium borides (V3B2, VB, V5B6, V3B4, and V2B3), six manganese borides (MnB4, MnB2, Mn3B4, MnB, and o-Mn2B), and MB2 boride were considered. MB2 boride is VB2 phase in the B-V system and MnB2 boride in the B-Mn system. The MB2 boride is equilibrium phase only for high temperatures in the B-Mn system (Figure 1(a)); however, in the B-V system, it is stable also for low temperatures (Figure 1(b)). No ternary phase was considered in the ternary system, which is conformable with the experimental work [5]. Crystallographic data of the phases are given in Table 3. Calculated isothermal sections at 973, 1073, and 1173 K are shown in Figure 2. Experimental data points from the work [5] are presented in Figure 2(b). The significant difference between the calculated phase diagram and the work of Telegus et al. [5] is the presence of the o-Mn2B phase in our calculation rather than the Mn4B phase given in the phase work [5]. The decision about the replacement of the Mn4B phase is based on the work of Tergenius [14], who studied the Mn4B phase and redefined the phase as Mn2B0.982. Very good agreement between experimental results and the modelled isothermal section at 1073 K was achieved. Thermodynamic parameters developed in the present work are given in Table 4. The set of parameters was developed to fit available experimental results at 1073 K as best as possible and also to calculate reasonable phase equilibria for lower and higher temperatures. Therefore, some parameters are temperature-dependent.Figure 1
Phase diagrams of the binary subsystems: (a) B-Mn, (b) B-V, and (c) Mn-V.
(a)
(b)
(c)Table 3
Crystallographic data of the phases.
Phase
Pearson symbol/space group
Reference
δ-Mn, α-Fe, V (BCC)
cI2/Im3m
[15]
γ-Mn, γ-Fe (FCC)
cF4/Fm3m
[15]
β-Mn (CUB)
cP20/P4132
[7]
α-Mn (CBCC)
cI58/I43m
[7]
o-Mn2B0.982
oF48/Fddd
[7]
t-Mn2B, Fe2B (M2B)
tI12/I4/mcm
[15]
MnB, FeB (MB)
oP8/Pnma
[15]
Mn3B4
oI14/Immm
[7]
MnB2, VB2 (MB2)
hP3/P6/mmm
[7]
MnB4
mC14/C2/m
[7]
β-B
hR108/R3m
[7]
V3B2
tP10/P4/mbm
[15]
VB
oC8/Cmcm
[15]
V5B6
oC22/Cmmm
[15]
V3B4
oI14/Immm
[15]
V2B3
oC8/Cmcm
[15]
σ
cP2/Pm3m
[15]
T
tP10/P4/mbm
[16]Figure 2
Calculated isothermal section of the phase diagram of the B-Mn-V system (a) at 973 K, (b) at 1073 K with experimental data points from literature [5], and (c) at 1173 K.
(a)
(b)
(c)Table 4
Thermodynamic parameters for the B-Mn-V system developed in the present work.
Phase
Parameters
M2B
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −65000
L
1(Mn, V : B) = −85000
MB
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −263490 + 130T
V3B2
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −186690
V3B4
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −310000
L
1(Mn, V : B) = 106000
L
2(Mn, V : B) = 180000
VB
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −128000
Mn3B4
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −500000
L
1(Mn, V : B) = −5000
L
2(Mn, V : B) = −10000
MB2
L
0(Mn, V : B) = −49000
L
1(Mn, V : B) = −4000
L
2(Mn, V : B) = 13540 + 12.53T
α-Mn
G
0(V : B) = GVBCC + GBβB + 2000
β-Mn
G
0(V : B) = GVBCC + GBβB + 2000The data were also used to calculate liquidus surface prediction of the system (Figure3). However, no experimental results about liquidus of the ternary system are known. So, its experimental verification was not possible at this moment.Figure 3
Liquidus projection of the B-Mn-V system.Considering no other experimental results for the system were found to be better described the B-Mn-V system, the description was used for calculations of a higher system.


## 4.2. B-Fe-Mn-V Quaternary System

Liquid, several solid solutions of metallic elements, one intermetallic phase, and lot of borides are the equilibrium phases in the quaternary system. Phases identified in the investigated alloys by experimental methods after long-term annealing are given in Table1. Borides were found in all alloys, the intermetallic σ-phase was found in alloy 2, and the BCC phase was found in iron-rich alloys.Calculations of phase equilibria for alloys are presented by isopleths (Figure4) and by mole fractions in dependence on temperature (Figure 5).Figure 4
Isopleth of the phase diagram: (a) 40B-Fe-5Mn-V and (b) 5B-Fe-5Mn-V.
(a)
(b)Figure 5
Calculated phase fractions in dependence on temperature for (a) alloy 1, (b) alloy 2, and (c) alloy 3.
(a)
(b)
(c)Microstructure of the alloy 1 is presented in Figure6. Large particles of borides are found in the alloy. There are three types of borides: M2B, MB, and V3B4. The alloy phase composition is conformable with calculation (Figures 4(a) and 5(a)). Experimentally determined chemical compositions of M2B (58Fe-5Mn-3V at %) and MB (36Fe-9V-5Mn at %) borides in the alloy are in very good agreement with the calculated values (Table 5). Experimental values of metallic elements in V3B4 are 29V-2.5Mn-11Fe at %. There are small differences between experimental and calculated values (Table 5) in the composition of V3B4 boride in the alloy.Figure 6
Microstructure of the alloy 1 after annealing with the EDX spectrum of identified phases.Table 5
Chemical composition of equilibrium phases at 900 K.
Alloy
Phases
Calculated values (at %)
1
M2B
57.3Fe-5.2Mn-4.1V
MB
38Fe-7.2V-4.8Mn
V3B4
38.2V-4.2Mn-0.5Fe
2
σ
63Fe-26V-11Mn
VB
44.6V-5.4Mn-0.01Fe
3
M2B
37.8Mn-26.8Fe-2VAlloys 2 and 3 contain significantly less boron than the alloy 1. Figure7 shows a eutectic structure of the alloy 2. The microstructure consists of the matrix and dark particles of borides. The boride particles are too small for exact determination of their chemical composition by EDX. However, the distribution of elements in the alloy (Figure 7(c)) shows that it is vanadium boride. The X-ray diffraction determined the boride as VB. The BCC phase and borides form from liquid. It is in conformance with the calculated isopleth (Figure 4(b)). The σ-phase that was determined by X-ray diffraction in the alloy forms as a secondary phase from solid phases. Very similar average atomic numbers of the σ-phase and matrix do not allow to distinguish between these phases by scanning electron microscopy because the atomic number contrast between them is negligible. It may be a reason why the σ-phase was not identified by this method. Experimentally identified phase composition of the alloy is in accordance with calculation (Figure 5(b)).Figure 7
(a) Microstructure of the alloy 2 after annealing and (b) detail and (c) distribution of vanadium in the corresponding alloy.
(a)
(b)
(c)DTA heating and cooling curves of alloy 2 show phase transformation at 1025 K (752°C) (Figure8). The experimentally determined temperature is comparable with the calculated temperature of phase transformation between BCC + σ + VB and BCC + VB (Figure 5(b)). The calculated temperature of the phase transformation is 1024 K. Based on comparison between experimental measurements and calculation, it is supposed that the peak of DTA curves at 1025 K indicates dissolution of the intermetallic σ-phase at heating, or formation of the σ-phase at cooling. There is a very good agreement between experimental measurements and calculation.Figure 8
DTA curves (two identical heating and cooling cycles) of alloy 2.The microstructure of the alloy 3 is presented in Figure9. M2B boride and BCC phase were found in the alloys after annealing. It is in accordance with calculation (Figure 5(c)).Figure 9
Microstructure of the alloy 3 after annealing.Comparison of experimental and theoretical results shows very good agreement between them. The agreement also indicates that description of the B-Mn-V ternary system modelled by using a limited number of experimental results is sufficient.


## 5. Conclusions

This work was focused on phase equilibria of the B-V-Mn ternary system and B-Fe-Mn-V quaternary system. The results can be summarized as follows:(i)
Thermodynamic description of the B-Mn-V system was developed by the Calphad method using available literature experimental-phase data. Boron was modelled as an interstitial element in solid solutions.(ii)
Very good agreement was achieved between experimental results and calculation of the ternary system.(iii)
Extrapolation to the B-Fe-Mn-V quaternary system by using descriptions of all ternary subsystems with no quaternary interaction parameters was done.(iv)
Experimental phase analysis of the quaternary alloys after long-time annealing was performed.(v)
Calculations for the quaternary systems are in very good agreement with the present experimental results.(vi)
Database based on the ternary systems (B-Mn-V, B-Fe-V, B-Fe-Mn, and Fe-Mn-V) is applicable also for calculations of the quaternary system.



---

*Source: 3950980-2018-06-24.xml*