# Potent Antiproliferative Effect on Liver Cancer of Medicinal Plants Selected from the Thai/Lanna Medicinal Plant Recipe Database “MANOSROI III”

Authors: Aranya Manosroi; Hiroyuki Akazawa; Worapong Kitdamrongtham; Toshihiro Akihisa; Worapaka Manosroi; Jiradej Manosroi
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Thai/Lanna medicinal plant recipes have been used for the treatment of several diseases including liver cancer. In this study, methanolic extracts (MEs) of 23 plants were tested for antiproliferative activity on human hepatoma cell line (Hep G2) by the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. Nine MEs with potent antiproliferative activity (IC50 < 100 µg/mL) were obtained and further semipurified by liquid/liquid partition extraction. The semipurified fractions were tested for the antiproliferative and antioxidative activities. ME of Stemona collinsae and the semipurified extract and methanol-water fraction (MF) of Gloriosa superba gave the highest antiproliferative activity on HepG2 which were 4.79- and 50.07-fold cisplatin, respectively. The semipurified fractions showed an increased antiproliferative activity. MF of Caesalpinia sappan and HF of Senna alata showed the highest free radical scavenging and metal chelating activities, respectively. The compound in n-hexane fraction (HF) of Ventilago denticulata which showed an increase in antiproliferative activity comparing to its ME was isolated and identified as emodin. This study has demonstrated the potential of the ME from S. collinsae, MF from G. superba, and emodin isolated from V. denticulata, for further development as an antiliver cancer agent.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Hepatocellular cancer and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are the two major forms of primary liver cancers. The incidence of these two carcinomas is the fifth most common widespread cancer in the world. Hepatocellular carcinoma can damage the hepatic cells via oxidative stress and generation of inflammation related to hepatocarcinogenesis [1]. Several types of chemotherapeutic drugs have been used to treat hepatic cancer such as cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and paclitaxel. However, these drugs usually have some problems of cancer resistance, due to multidrug resistance protein and the decrease of apoptotic proteins. Recently, many medicinal plants have been investigated as an alternative of chemotherapeutic drugs. Most medicinal plants from traditional medicines are safer than the chemical substances with effectiveness. This may be due to the traditional uses in human for several generations. Only those which showed therapeutic efficacy and safety will be recorded and used until now.The Lanna region covered several provinces in China, Laos, Myanmar, and Thailand. The Lanna region in Thailand includes seven provinces which are Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, Lamphun, Lampang, Phayao, Phrae, and Nan. Lanna has its own folklore wisdom including traditional medicinal plant recipes. These recipes have been recorded and used for over 700 years. Interestingly, some of the recipes are still currently used in the northern part of Thailand for the treatment of several diseases such as fever, diarrhea, diabetes, tuberculosis, arthritis, and cancer. Professor Dr. Jiradej Manosroi from the Manose Research Center has collected the medicinal plant recipes from several institutions, temples, and folklore doctors in the Lanna area and other regions all over Thailand and put into the database called “MANOSROI III.” Presently, this database contains about 200,000 medicinal plant recipes covering all diseases including cosmetics and food supplements [2, 3].Anticancer activities of many Thai medicinal plants can be selected from the recipes in the “MANOSROI III” database. Some plants have shown potent antiproliferative activitiesvia apoptotic action [3]. In this study, the antiproliferative activity on human hepatoma cell line (HepG2) and antioxidative activities of the methanol extracts of 23 plants selected from the Thai medicinal recipes database “MANOSROI III” were investigated. The extracts with strong antiproliferative activity were selected, further purified by liquid-liquid partition extraction, and reinvestigated and the potential to develop as anticancer compounds was anticipated.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials and Chemicals

Twenty-three plants with high frequency in the anticancer recipes were selected from the anticancer recipes in the Thai/Lanna medicinal recipe database “MANOSROI III.” Searching of the anticancer recipes was performed by using Thai keywords which were Ma-reng and San which mean cancer. The plants were collected from Chiang Mai, Thailand during March to May 2010. The voucher specimens of the plants were authenticated by a botanist and deposited at NPRDC, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University in Chiang Mai, Thailand (Table1). Methanol was obtained from Labscan Asia Co. Ltd. (Thailand). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was from Gibco BRL (Ontario, Canada). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) cell culture medium, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), sulforhodamine B (SRB),l-(+)-ascorbic acid, α-tocopherol, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), ferrozine, ferrous chloride (FeCl2), Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, aluminium chloride (AlCl3), potassium acetate (CH3CO2K), and quercetin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Cisplatin and doxorubicin hydrochloride (doxorubicin) were from Dabur Pharma Ltd. (Hampshire, UK).Table 1
Botanical names, families, part used, yields, and antiproliferative activity on human hepatoma cell line (HepG2) of the 23 methanol extracts of the medicinal plant selected from Thai/Lanna medicinal recipe database “MANOSROI III.”
Plant number
Name of the medicinal plant
Family
Part used
Yield (w/w%)
Voucher specimen number
Local name
English name
Antiproliferative activity on Hep G2
IC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
NCI criteria
Rank
C
D
1
Acanthus ebracteatusVahl
Acanthaceae
Stem
11.50
MANOSROI#0033
Ngueak Pla Moh
Sea holly
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
2
Aegle marmelos(L.) Correa ex Roxb.
Rutaceae
Fruit
43.88
MANOSROI#0034
Ma Toom
Bael
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
3
Albizia chinensis(Osbeck) Merr.
Leguminosae-Mimosoideae
Wood
5.79
MANOSROI#0021
Kang Luang
Silk tree
34.50
0.77
0.02
MA
7
4
Caesalpinia sappanL.
Caesalpiniaceae
Wood
14.23
MANOSROI#0022
Nam Khong, Fang
Sappan tree
20.12
1.31
0.03
MA
3
5
Cassia fistulaL.
Leguminosae
Wood
6.71
MANOSROI#0012
Ratcha Phruek
Golden shower
372.23
0.07
0.00
IA
11
6
Fibraurea tinctoriaLour.
Menispermaceae
Wood
7.04
MANOSROI#0035
Kamphaeng Ched Chan
—
89.11
0.30
0.01
MA
9
7
Gloriosa superbaL.
Colchicaceae
Root
7.92
MANOSROI#0036
Dong Dueng
Flame lily
20.11
1.31
0.03
MA
2
8
Hydnophytum formicarumJack
Rubiaceae
Bulb
17.06
MANOSROI#0037
Hua Roi Ru
Ant plant
129.02
0.20
0.00
IA
10
9
Nymphoides indicaKtze.
Gentianaceae
Wood
8.37
MANOSROI#0025
Tab Tao Yai
Water snowflake
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
10
Peltophorum pterocarpum(DC.) Backer ex K. Heyne
Leguminosae-Caesalpinoideae
Wood
10.52
MANOSROI#0023
San Ngoen
Copper pod
395.01
0.07
0.00
IA
13
11
Polyalthia debilisPierre Finet et Gagnep.
Annonaceae
Wood
5.96
MANOSROI#0024
Kluay Tao, Tab Tao
—
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
12
Pouzolzia pentandraBenn.
Urticaceae
Leaf
5.54
MANOSROI#0045
Kob Cha Nang Dang
—
35.51
0.74
0.02
MA
8
13
Psocarpus tetragonolobus(L.) DC.
Leguminosae-Papilionoideae
Rhizome
10.07
MANOSROI#0003
Thua Phu
Winged bean
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
14
Rhinacanthus nasutus(L.) Kurz
Acanthaceae
Whole
8.61
MANOSROI#0038
Thong Phan Chang
Snake jasmine
30.91
0.85
0.02
MA
6
15
Senna alata(L.) Roxb.
Leguminosae-Caesalpinoideae
Root
21.52
MANOSROI#0030
Chumhet Thet
Candle tree
22.46
1.18
0.02
MA
5
16
Sida rhombifoliaL.
Malvaceae
Root
7.68
MANOSROI#0020
Ya Khat, Khat Mon
Paddy’s lucerne
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
17
Smilax glabraWall ex Roxb.
Smilaceae
Bulb
17.05
MANOSROI#0039
Khao Yen Tai
China root
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
18
Smilax corbulariaKunth
Smilaceae
Bulb
17.22
MANOSROI#0040
Khao Yen Nuea
Long-leaved greenbrier
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
19
Stemona collinsaeCraib
Stemonaceae
Stem
23.00
MANOSROI#0041
Non Tai Yak
—
5.51
4.79
0.10
A
1
20
Suregada multiflora(A. Juss.) Baill
Euphorbiaceae
Wood
6.35
MANOSROI#0042
Khan Thong Phayabat
Flase lime
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
21
Tiliacora triandraDiels.
Menispermaceae
Leaf
12.90
MANOSROI#0043
Thao Ya Nang
—
487.85
0.05
0.00
IA
14
22
Urceola minutifloraPierre. (DJ. Middleton)
Apocynaceae
Vine
9.64
MANOSROI#0026
Thao Muak Khao
—
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
23
Ventilago denticulataWild.
Rhamnaceae
Stem
4.97
MANOSROI#0044
Thaowal Lek
—
20.88
1.26
0.03
MA
4
Standard
Cisplatin (C)
26.41
1
—
—
—
Doxorubicin (D)
0.54
—
1
—
—
NCI criteria: the criteria indicated 3 types of activity.  A: active (IC50 < 20 mg/mL), MA: moderately active (IC50 = 20~100 mg/mL), and IA: inactive (IC50 > 100 mg/mL). ND: not determined. 1 of 23 plants (4.34%) was found active (A) and 8 of 23 plants (34.78%) were found moderately active (MA).


### 2.2. Crude Plant Extract Preparation

Ten grams of the dried and powdered plants was extracted with 200 mL of methanol (2 h reflux, 3 times). The mixture was filtered and the methanol filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator (Buchi, Switzerland) to give the methanol extract (ME). The yield was represented as percentages of the crude extracts comparing to the dried plant.


### 2.3. Liquid-Liquid Partition Extraction

The 9 MEs which gave the GI50 values of less than 100 μg/mL [active (A)/moderately active (MA) according to the NCI criteria] were selected and further fractionated by liquid-liquid partition extraction. Briefly, one gram of the MEs was dissolved in 100 mL of water and partitioned with an equal volume of ethyl acetate. The aqueous layer was reextracted with an equal volume of ethyl acetate for 2 times. The ethyl acetate layer was pooled, concentrated to 5 mL, dissolved in 95 mL of methanol, and reextracted with 100 mL of hexane for 3 times to obtain the hexane (HF) and methanol-water (MF) soluble fractions. The aqueous layer was reextracted with an equal volume of n-butanol for 3 times to obtain n-butanol (BF) and water (WF) soluble fractions (Figure 1).Figure 1
Liquid-liquid partition method from the methanolic extract (ME) to the 4 fractions (n-hexane, methanol-water, n-butanol, and water soluble fractions).


### 2.4. Compound Isolation fromVentilago denticulata

The dried stem ofV. denticulata (1.6 kg) was extracted by methanol to obtain ME (100 g). A portion of ME (78 g) was extracted by liquid-liquid partition extraction to yield HF (15 g), MF (14 g), BF (17 g), and WF (16 g). According to the antiproliferative activity results, HF (2.6 g) was further fractionated by silica gel column chromatography (50 g) using the mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate as the mobile phase. Seven fractions (HF-1~7) according to the successive polarity range solvents (hexane/ethyl acetate = 1 : 0 to 0 : 1) were obtained. Fraction HF-2 (1.3 g) which was eluted by 90% hexane in ethyl acetate was further purified by silica gel column chromatography (50 g) using hexane-ethyl acetate to obtain the orange fraction (HF-2-O, hexane/ethyl acetate = 95 : 5). This fraction was purified by the preparative HPLC with C18 column (10ϕ×250 mm, 5 μ) using methanol/water = 9 : 1 and the flow rate at 2.0 mL/min to obtain a single compound.


### 2.5. Antiproliferative Activity

#### 2.5.1. Sample Preparation

The MEs and fractions were dissolved in DMEM medium containing 0.5% v/v of DMSO [4] and DMSO, respectively. The samples were centrifuged at 5,000 g, room temperature (25±2°C) for 5 min, sterilized by filtering through 0.2 μm cellulose acetate membranes (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany), and stored at −20°C. The final concentrations of MEs and fractions were in the range of 1 × 101–1 × 10−5 and 1–1 × 10−6 mg/mL, respectively.


#### 2.5.2. Human Hepatic Cancer Cell Culture

The human hepatoma (Hep G2) cell line was obtained from Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. The cells were subcultured into a 25 cm2 plastic flask containing DMEM supplemented with 10% of FBS, 100 U/mL of penicillin, and 100 mg/mL of streptomycin. The flask was incubated at 37°C in a humidified air incubator containing 5% carbon dioxide (CO2).


#### 2.5.3. Antiproliferative Activity by the Sulforhodamine B (SRB) Assay

Effects of extracts on the growth of Hep G2 cell line were evaluated according to the procedure of the American National Cancer Institute (NCI) for thein vitro anticancer drug screening using the protein-binding dye SRB to assess cell growth [5]. The assay was performed as previously described by Manosroi et al. [6] with some modifications. Briefly, cells were harvested, seeded into 96-well plate (Gibthai Co. Ltd. Thailand) at the density of 1 × 104 cells/well, and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cells were treated with various concentrations (10–10−6mg/mL) of the samples for 24 hours. After incubation, the cells were fixed with 50% trichloroacetic acid and dyed with SRB solution. One hundred μL of Tris-solution was added to each well and incubated for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm by a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, model 680, Philadelphia, PA, USA). The final concentration of DMSO in each well was less than 1% v/v and the assays were done in triplicate. The percentage of growth inhibition (%G) was calculated as %G=(Ttreat-T0)/(Tcontrol-T0)×100, where Ttreat was the absorbance of the samples after incubation for 24 h, T0 was the absorbance at initial (0 h), and Tcontrol was the absorbance of the control (DMSO only) after incubation for 24 h. The dose response curve was prepared by plotting the %G versus the concentrations of the samples and the IC50 values (the concentrations of the samples giving 50% growth inhibition) were determined. Cisplatin and doxorubicin, the standard anticancer drugs, were used as the positive controls. Folds of activity in comparing with the standard drugs were calculated as follows: Folds = (IC50 values of the standard drugs)/(IC50 values of the samples).


### 2.6. Antioxidative Activities

#### 2.6.1. 1,1-Diphenyl-2-Picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity

The DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined by the method previously described [7]. Briefly, 50 μL of the samples was put into 96-well microplate (Nalge Nunc International, NY, USA) and 50 μL of ethanol solution of DPPH were added into each well and mixed. After incubation for 30 min at room temperature (25±2°C), the absorbance was measured at 515 nm by a well plate reader (Bio-Rad, model 680 microplate reader, PA, USA) against the blank (DMSO). All samples were dissolved in DMSO and the final concentrations were adjusted to the range of 0.01–100 μg/mL. Ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol were used as the positive controls. The experiments were done in triplicate. The SC50 value, the concentration of the sample that scavenged 50% of DPPH radical, was determined from the plotted curve.


#### 2.6.2. Metal Chelating Activity

The metal chelating activity was determined by the ferrous iron-ferrozine complex method as previously described [7]. The mixture of the sample (50 μL) and water (20 μL) was added into a 96-well plate and 1.5 mM FeCl2 (10 μL) in water was added into each well and mixed. After incubation for 15 min at room temperature (25±2°C) in darkness, 20 μL of 3 mM ferrozine in water was added into each well and the absorbance was measured by a microplate reader at 570 nm using DMSO as a negative control. The final concentration of the samples was varied within the range of 0.005–500 μg/mL. EDTA was used as a positive control and the experiments were done in triplicate. The concentration in which the sample exhibited 50% metal chelating activity of ferrous ion (CC50) was determined.


#### 2.6.3. Total Phenolic Contents

The total phenolic contents as quercetin equivalents of the extracts and fractions were determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent [7]. Briefly, 10 mg/mL of the samples was mixed with Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and 20% (w/v) of sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) at room temperature (25±2°C). After incubation for 60 min, the absorbance at 760 nm was measured by a microplate reader. The total phenolic contents of the samples were expressed as μg of quercetin equivalents (QE) per mg of the samples.


#### 2.6.4. Total Flavonoid Contents

Aluminium chloride (AlCl3) colorimetric method was used to determine the flavonoid contents with slight modification [8]. Briefly, 10 mg/mL of the samples was mixed with methanol, 5 μL of 10% AlCl3, 5 μL of 1 M CH3CO2K, and 140 μL of distilled water and the mixture was adjusted to 250 μL with methanol. After incubation at room temperature (25±2°C) for 30 min, the absorbance at 415 nm was measured with a microplate reader. The total flavonoid contents of the samples were expressed as μg of quercetin equivalents (QE) per mg of the samples.


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

All assays were performed in triplicate of three independent and separate experiments. The means of each test were calculated.


## 2.1. Materials and Chemicals

Twenty-three plants with high frequency in the anticancer recipes were selected from the anticancer recipes in the Thai/Lanna medicinal recipe database “MANOSROI III.” Searching of the anticancer recipes was performed by using Thai keywords which were Ma-reng and San which mean cancer. The plants were collected from Chiang Mai, Thailand during March to May 2010. The voucher specimens of the plants were authenticated by a botanist and deposited at NPRDC, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University in Chiang Mai, Thailand (Table1). Methanol was obtained from Labscan Asia Co. Ltd. (Thailand). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was from Gibco BRL (Ontario, Canada). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) cell culture medium, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), sulforhodamine B (SRB),l-(+)-ascorbic acid, α-tocopherol, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), ferrozine, ferrous chloride (FeCl2), Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, aluminium chloride (AlCl3), potassium acetate (CH3CO2K), and quercetin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Cisplatin and doxorubicin hydrochloride (doxorubicin) were from Dabur Pharma Ltd. (Hampshire, UK).Table 1
Botanical names, families, part used, yields, and antiproliferative activity on human hepatoma cell line (HepG2) of the 23 methanol extracts of the medicinal plant selected from Thai/Lanna medicinal recipe database “MANOSROI III.”
Plant number
Name of the medicinal plant
Family
Part used
Yield (w/w%)
Voucher specimen number
Local name
English name
Antiproliferative activity on Hep G2
IC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
NCI criteria
Rank
C
D
1
Acanthus ebracteatusVahl
Acanthaceae
Stem
11.50
MANOSROI#0033
Ngueak Pla Moh
Sea holly
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
2
Aegle marmelos(L.) Correa ex Roxb.
Rutaceae
Fruit
43.88
MANOSROI#0034
Ma Toom
Bael
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
3
Albizia chinensis(Osbeck) Merr.
Leguminosae-Mimosoideae
Wood
5.79
MANOSROI#0021
Kang Luang
Silk tree
34.50
0.77
0.02
MA
7
4
Caesalpinia sappanL.
Caesalpiniaceae
Wood
14.23
MANOSROI#0022
Nam Khong, Fang
Sappan tree
20.12
1.31
0.03
MA
3
5
Cassia fistulaL.
Leguminosae
Wood
6.71
MANOSROI#0012
Ratcha Phruek
Golden shower
372.23
0.07
0.00
IA
11
6
Fibraurea tinctoriaLour.
Menispermaceae
Wood
7.04
MANOSROI#0035
Kamphaeng Ched Chan
—
89.11
0.30
0.01
MA
9
7
Gloriosa superbaL.
Colchicaceae
Root
7.92
MANOSROI#0036
Dong Dueng
Flame lily
20.11
1.31
0.03
MA
2
8
Hydnophytum formicarumJack
Rubiaceae
Bulb
17.06
MANOSROI#0037
Hua Roi Ru
Ant plant
129.02
0.20
0.00
IA
10
9
Nymphoides indicaKtze.
Gentianaceae
Wood
8.37
MANOSROI#0025
Tab Tao Yai
Water snowflake
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
10
Peltophorum pterocarpum(DC.) Backer ex K. Heyne
Leguminosae-Caesalpinoideae
Wood
10.52
MANOSROI#0023
San Ngoen
Copper pod
395.01
0.07
0.00
IA
13
11
Polyalthia debilisPierre Finet et Gagnep.
Annonaceae
Wood
5.96
MANOSROI#0024
Kluay Tao, Tab Tao
—
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
12
Pouzolzia pentandraBenn.
Urticaceae
Leaf
5.54
MANOSROI#0045
Kob Cha Nang Dang
—
35.51
0.74
0.02
MA
8
13
Psocarpus tetragonolobus(L.) DC.
Leguminosae-Papilionoideae
Rhizome
10.07
MANOSROI#0003
Thua Phu
Winged bean
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
14
Rhinacanthus nasutus(L.) Kurz
Acanthaceae
Whole
8.61
MANOSROI#0038
Thong Phan Chang
Snake jasmine
30.91
0.85
0.02
MA
6
15
Senna alata(L.) Roxb.
Leguminosae-Caesalpinoideae
Root
21.52
MANOSROI#0030
Chumhet Thet
Candle tree
22.46
1.18
0.02
MA
5
16
Sida rhombifoliaL.
Malvaceae
Root
7.68
MANOSROI#0020
Ya Khat, Khat Mon
Paddy’s lucerne
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
17
Smilax glabraWall ex Roxb.
Smilaceae
Bulb
17.05
MANOSROI#0039
Khao Yen Tai
China root
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
18
Smilax corbulariaKunth
Smilaceae
Bulb
17.22
MANOSROI#0040
Khao Yen Nuea
Long-leaved greenbrier
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
19
Stemona collinsaeCraib
Stemonaceae
Stem
23.00
MANOSROI#0041
Non Tai Yak
—
5.51
4.79
0.10
A
1
20
Suregada multiflora(A. Juss.) Baill
Euphorbiaceae
Wood
6.35
MANOSROI#0042
Khan Thong Phayabat
Flase lime
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
21
Tiliacora triandraDiels.
Menispermaceae
Leaf
12.90
MANOSROI#0043
Thao Ya Nang
—
487.85
0.05
0.00
IA
14
22
Urceola minutifloraPierre. (DJ. Middleton)
Apocynaceae
Vine
9.64
MANOSROI#0026
Thao Muak Khao
—
>1000
ND
ND
IA
15
23
Ventilago denticulataWild.
Rhamnaceae
Stem
4.97
MANOSROI#0044
Thaowal Lek
—
20.88
1.26
0.03
MA
4
Standard
Cisplatin (C)
26.41
1
—
—
—
Doxorubicin (D)
0.54
—
1
—
—
NCI criteria: the criteria indicated 3 types of activity.  A: active (IC50 < 20 mg/mL), MA: moderately active (IC50 = 20~100 mg/mL), and IA: inactive (IC50 > 100 mg/mL). ND: not determined. 1 of 23 plants (4.34%) was found active (A) and 8 of 23 plants (34.78%) were found moderately active (MA).


## 2.2. Crude Plant Extract Preparation

Ten grams of the dried and powdered plants was extracted with 200 mL of methanol (2 h reflux, 3 times). The mixture was filtered and the methanol filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator (Buchi, Switzerland) to give the methanol extract (ME). The yield was represented as percentages of the crude extracts comparing to the dried plant.


## 2.3. Liquid-Liquid Partition Extraction

The 9 MEs which gave the GI50 values of less than 100 μg/mL [active (A)/moderately active (MA) according to the NCI criteria] were selected and further fractionated by liquid-liquid partition extraction. Briefly, one gram of the MEs was dissolved in 100 mL of water and partitioned with an equal volume of ethyl acetate. The aqueous layer was reextracted with an equal volume of ethyl acetate for 2 times. The ethyl acetate layer was pooled, concentrated to 5 mL, dissolved in 95 mL of methanol, and reextracted with 100 mL of hexane for 3 times to obtain the hexane (HF) and methanol-water (MF) soluble fractions. The aqueous layer was reextracted with an equal volume of n-butanol for 3 times to obtain n-butanol (BF) and water (WF) soluble fractions (Figure 1).Figure 1
Liquid-liquid partition method from the methanolic extract (ME) to the 4 fractions (n-hexane, methanol-water, n-butanol, and water soluble fractions).


## 2.4. Compound Isolation fromVentilago denticulata

The dried stem ofV. denticulata (1.6 kg) was extracted by methanol to obtain ME (100 g). A portion of ME (78 g) was extracted by liquid-liquid partition extraction to yield HF (15 g), MF (14 g), BF (17 g), and WF (16 g). According to the antiproliferative activity results, HF (2.6 g) was further fractionated by silica gel column chromatography (50 g) using the mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate as the mobile phase. Seven fractions (HF-1~7) according to the successive polarity range solvents (hexane/ethyl acetate = 1 : 0 to 0 : 1) were obtained. Fraction HF-2 (1.3 g) which was eluted by 90% hexane in ethyl acetate was further purified by silica gel column chromatography (50 g) using hexane-ethyl acetate to obtain the orange fraction (HF-2-O, hexane/ethyl acetate = 95 : 5). This fraction was purified by the preparative HPLC with C18 column (10ϕ×250 mm, 5 μ) using methanol/water = 9 : 1 and the flow rate at 2.0 mL/min to obtain a single compound.


## 2.5. Antiproliferative Activity

### 2.5.1. Sample Preparation

The MEs and fractions were dissolved in DMEM medium containing 0.5% v/v of DMSO [4] and DMSO, respectively. The samples were centrifuged at 5,000 g, room temperature (25±2°C) for 5 min, sterilized by filtering through 0.2 μm cellulose acetate membranes (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany), and stored at −20°C. The final concentrations of MEs and fractions were in the range of 1 × 101–1 × 10−5 and 1–1 × 10−6 mg/mL, respectively.


### 2.5.2. Human Hepatic Cancer Cell Culture

The human hepatoma (Hep G2) cell line was obtained from Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. The cells were subcultured into a 25 cm2 plastic flask containing DMEM supplemented with 10% of FBS, 100 U/mL of penicillin, and 100 mg/mL of streptomycin. The flask was incubated at 37°C in a humidified air incubator containing 5% carbon dioxide (CO2).


### 2.5.3. Antiproliferative Activity by the Sulforhodamine B (SRB) Assay

Effects of extracts on the growth of Hep G2 cell line were evaluated according to the procedure of the American National Cancer Institute (NCI) for thein vitro anticancer drug screening using the protein-binding dye SRB to assess cell growth [5]. The assay was performed as previously described by Manosroi et al. [6] with some modifications. Briefly, cells were harvested, seeded into 96-well plate (Gibthai Co. Ltd. Thailand) at the density of 1 × 104 cells/well, and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cells were treated with various concentrations (10–10−6mg/mL) of the samples for 24 hours. After incubation, the cells were fixed with 50% trichloroacetic acid and dyed with SRB solution. One hundred μL of Tris-solution was added to each well and incubated for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm by a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, model 680, Philadelphia, PA, USA). The final concentration of DMSO in each well was less than 1% v/v and the assays were done in triplicate. The percentage of growth inhibition (%G) was calculated as %G=(Ttreat-T0)/(Tcontrol-T0)×100, where Ttreat was the absorbance of the samples after incubation for 24 h, T0 was the absorbance at initial (0 h), and Tcontrol was the absorbance of the control (DMSO only) after incubation for 24 h. The dose response curve was prepared by plotting the %G versus the concentrations of the samples and the IC50 values (the concentrations of the samples giving 50% growth inhibition) were determined. Cisplatin and doxorubicin, the standard anticancer drugs, were used as the positive controls. Folds of activity in comparing with the standard drugs were calculated as follows: Folds = (IC50 values of the standard drugs)/(IC50 values of the samples).


## 2.5.1. Sample Preparation

The MEs and fractions were dissolved in DMEM medium containing 0.5% v/v of DMSO [4] and DMSO, respectively. The samples were centrifuged at 5,000 g, room temperature (25±2°C) for 5 min, sterilized by filtering through 0.2 μm cellulose acetate membranes (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany), and stored at −20°C. The final concentrations of MEs and fractions were in the range of 1 × 101–1 × 10−5 and 1–1 × 10−6 mg/mL, respectively.


## 2.5.2. Human Hepatic Cancer Cell Culture

The human hepatoma (Hep G2) cell line was obtained from Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. The cells were subcultured into a 25 cm2 plastic flask containing DMEM supplemented with 10% of FBS, 100 U/mL of penicillin, and 100 mg/mL of streptomycin. The flask was incubated at 37°C in a humidified air incubator containing 5% carbon dioxide (CO2).


## 2.5.3. Antiproliferative Activity by the Sulforhodamine B (SRB) Assay

Effects of extracts on the growth of Hep G2 cell line were evaluated according to the procedure of the American National Cancer Institute (NCI) for thein vitro anticancer drug screening using the protein-binding dye SRB to assess cell growth [5]. The assay was performed as previously described by Manosroi et al. [6] with some modifications. Briefly, cells were harvested, seeded into 96-well plate (Gibthai Co. Ltd. Thailand) at the density of 1 × 104 cells/well, and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cells were treated with various concentrations (10–10−6mg/mL) of the samples for 24 hours. After incubation, the cells were fixed with 50% trichloroacetic acid and dyed with SRB solution. One hundred μL of Tris-solution was added to each well and incubated for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm by a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, model 680, Philadelphia, PA, USA). The final concentration of DMSO in each well was less than 1% v/v and the assays were done in triplicate. The percentage of growth inhibition (%G) was calculated as %G=(Ttreat-T0)/(Tcontrol-T0)×100, where Ttreat was the absorbance of the samples after incubation for 24 h, T0 was the absorbance at initial (0 h), and Tcontrol was the absorbance of the control (DMSO only) after incubation for 24 h. The dose response curve was prepared by plotting the %G versus the concentrations of the samples and the IC50 values (the concentrations of the samples giving 50% growth inhibition) were determined. Cisplatin and doxorubicin, the standard anticancer drugs, were used as the positive controls. Folds of activity in comparing with the standard drugs were calculated as follows: Folds = (IC50 values of the standard drugs)/(IC50 values of the samples).


## 2.6. Antioxidative Activities

### 2.6.1. 1,1-Diphenyl-2-Picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity

The DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined by the method previously described [7]. Briefly, 50 μL of the samples was put into 96-well microplate (Nalge Nunc International, NY, USA) and 50 μL of ethanol solution of DPPH were added into each well and mixed. After incubation for 30 min at room temperature (25±2°C), the absorbance was measured at 515 nm by a well plate reader (Bio-Rad, model 680 microplate reader, PA, USA) against the blank (DMSO). All samples were dissolved in DMSO and the final concentrations were adjusted to the range of 0.01–100 μg/mL. Ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol were used as the positive controls. The experiments were done in triplicate. The SC50 value, the concentration of the sample that scavenged 50% of DPPH radical, was determined from the plotted curve.


### 2.6.2. Metal Chelating Activity

The metal chelating activity was determined by the ferrous iron-ferrozine complex method as previously described [7]. The mixture of the sample (50 μL) and water (20 μL) was added into a 96-well plate and 1.5 mM FeCl2 (10 μL) in water was added into each well and mixed. After incubation for 15 min at room temperature (25±2°C) in darkness, 20 μL of 3 mM ferrozine in water was added into each well and the absorbance was measured by a microplate reader at 570 nm using DMSO as a negative control. The final concentration of the samples was varied within the range of 0.005–500 μg/mL. EDTA was used as a positive control and the experiments were done in triplicate. The concentration in which the sample exhibited 50% metal chelating activity of ferrous ion (CC50) was determined.


### 2.6.3. Total Phenolic Contents

The total phenolic contents as quercetin equivalents of the extracts and fractions were determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent [7]. Briefly, 10 mg/mL of the samples was mixed with Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and 20% (w/v) of sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) at room temperature (25±2°C). After incubation for 60 min, the absorbance at 760 nm was measured by a microplate reader. The total phenolic contents of the samples were expressed as μg of quercetin equivalents (QE) per mg of the samples.


### 2.6.4. Total Flavonoid Contents

Aluminium chloride (AlCl3) colorimetric method was used to determine the flavonoid contents with slight modification [8]. Briefly, 10 mg/mL of the samples was mixed with methanol, 5 μL of 10% AlCl3, 5 μL of 1 M CH3CO2K, and 140 μL of distilled water and the mixture was adjusted to 250 μL with methanol. After incubation at room temperature (25±2°C) for 30 min, the absorbance at 415 nm was measured with a microplate reader. The total flavonoid contents of the samples were expressed as μg of quercetin equivalents (QE) per mg of the samples.


## 2.6.1. 1,1-Diphenyl-2-Picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity

The DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined by the method previously described [7]. Briefly, 50 μL of the samples was put into 96-well microplate (Nalge Nunc International, NY, USA) and 50 μL of ethanol solution of DPPH were added into each well and mixed. After incubation for 30 min at room temperature (25±2°C), the absorbance was measured at 515 nm by a well plate reader (Bio-Rad, model 680 microplate reader, PA, USA) against the blank (DMSO). All samples were dissolved in DMSO and the final concentrations were adjusted to the range of 0.01–100 μg/mL. Ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol were used as the positive controls. The experiments were done in triplicate. The SC50 value, the concentration of the sample that scavenged 50% of DPPH radical, was determined from the plotted curve.


## 2.6.2. Metal Chelating Activity

The metal chelating activity was determined by the ferrous iron-ferrozine complex method as previously described [7]. The mixture of the sample (50 μL) and water (20 μL) was added into a 96-well plate and 1.5 mM FeCl2 (10 μL) in water was added into each well and mixed. After incubation for 15 min at room temperature (25±2°C) in darkness, 20 μL of 3 mM ferrozine in water was added into each well and the absorbance was measured by a microplate reader at 570 nm using DMSO as a negative control. The final concentration of the samples was varied within the range of 0.005–500 μg/mL. EDTA was used as a positive control and the experiments were done in triplicate. The concentration in which the sample exhibited 50% metal chelating activity of ferrous ion (CC50) was determined.


## 2.6.3. Total Phenolic Contents

The total phenolic contents as quercetin equivalents of the extracts and fractions were determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent [7]. Briefly, 10 mg/mL of the samples was mixed with Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and 20% (w/v) of sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) at room temperature (25±2°C). After incubation for 60 min, the absorbance at 760 nm was measured by a microplate reader. The total phenolic contents of the samples were expressed as μg of quercetin equivalents (QE) per mg of the samples.


## 2.6.4. Total Flavonoid Contents

Aluminium chloride (AlCl3) colorimetric method was used to determine the flavonoid contents with slight modification [8]. Briefly, 10 mg/mL of the samples was mixed with methanol, 5 μL of 10% AlCl3, 5 μL of 1 M CH3CO2K, and 140 μL of distilled water and the mixture was adjusted to 250 μL with methanol. After incubation at room temperature (25±2°C) for 30 min, the absorbance at 415 nm was measured with a microplate reader. The total flavonoid contents of the samples were expressed as μg of quercetin equivalents (QE) per mg of the samples.


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

All assays were performed in triplicate of three independent and separate experiments. The means of each test were calculated.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Antiproliferative Activity of the 23 Methanolic Plant Extracts

Botanical names, families, parts used, yields, and antiproliferative activity on Hep G2 cell line of the 23 Thai medicinal plant MEs were shown in Table1. According to the cytotoxicity activity criteria as established by the NCI, the IC50 values lower than 20 μg/mL, in the range of 20 to 100 μg/mL, and more than 100 μg/mL are regarded as active (A), moderately active (MA), and inactive (IA), respectively [9]. Only ME ofS. collinsae showed A activity with the highest antiproliferative activities (IC50 = 5.51 μg/mL) on HepG2 cell line which was 4.79- and 0.10-fold cisplatin and doxorubicin, respectively. Eight MEs ofG. superba (IC50 = 20.11 μg/mL),C. sappan (IC50 = 20.12 μg/mL),V. denticulata (IC50 = 20.88 μg/mL),S. alata (IC50 = 22.46 μg/mL),Rhinacanthus nasutus (IC50 = 30.91 μg/mL),Albizia chinensis (IC50 = 34.50 μg/mL),Pouzolzia pentandra (IC50 = 35.51 μg/mL), andFibraurea tinctoria (IC50 = 89.11 μg/mL) which gave the IC50 values of less than 100 μg/mL were regarded as MA. The A and MA MEs and their fractions were further fractionated, tested for antiproliferative activity of these 9 MEs, and summarized in Table 2. TheG. superba MF extract exhibited the highest antiproliferative activity with the IC50 value of 0.53 μg/mL (A) which was 37.79-, 50.07-, and 1.02-fold its ME, cisplatin, and doxorubicin, respectively.Table 2
Antiproliferative activity on HepG2 cell line, DPPH radical scavenging and metal chelating activities, total phenolic and flavonoid contents of 9 methanolic extracts (MEs) and 36 semipurified fractions of the 9 selected medicinal plants selected from Thai/Lanna medicinal plant recipe database “MANOSROI III.”
Plant number
Name of medicinal plant
Hep G2
DPPH
Chelating
Phenolic content
Flavonoid content
IC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
NCI criteria
Rank
SC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
Rank
CC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
Rank
QE (µg/mg)
Rank
QE (µg/mg)
Rank
C
D
T
A
E
3
Albizia chinensis ME
34.50
0.77
0.02
MA
23
59.30
0.40
0.31
8
>500
ND
16
218.51
6
0.81
28
A. chinensis HF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
435.60
0.03
14
12.98
39
ND
31
A. chinensis MF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
40.20
0.59
0.46
4
>500
ND
16
149.17
9
3.95
19
A. chinensis BF
10.80
2.44
0.05
A
7
47.30
0.50
0.39
6
>500
ND
16
323.63
3
2.13
23
A. chinensis WF
31.50
0.84
0.02
MA
22
87.60
0.27
0.21
11
>500
ND
16
122.73
10
1.13
27
4
Caesalpinia sappan ME
20.12
1.31
0.03
MA
14
26.00
0.92
0.70
2
>500
ND
16
475.41
1
22.39
5
C. sappan HF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
22.90
31
ND
31
C. sappan MF
27.11
0.97
0.02
MA
20
21.91
1.09
0.84
1
>500
ND
16
61.58
18
9.61
10
C. sappan BF
9.97
2.65
0.05
A
6
26.60
0.89
0.69
3
>500
ND
16
361.69
2
4.62
15
C. sappan WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
64.16
17
0.59
29
6
Fibraurea tinctoria ME
89.11
0.30
0.01
MA
25
43.20
0.55
0.42
5
>500
ND
16
305.17
4
2.32
22
F. tinctoria HF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
367.30
0.04
11
16.14
36
ND
31
F. tinctoriaMF
19.11
1.38
0.03
A
12
51.10
0.47
0.36
7
>500
ND
16
155.36
8
4.15
17
F. tinctoria BF
21.33
1.24
0.03
MA
17
76.40
0.31
0.24
10
>500
ND
16
260.24
5
4.57
16
F. tinctoria WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
62.40
0.38
0.29
9
>500
ND
16
175.41
7
3.91
20
7
Gloriosa superba ME
20.11
1.31
0.03
MA
14
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
52.83
20
8.32
11
G. superba HF
3.82
6.91
0.14
A
2
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
20.00
32
ND
31
G. superba MF
0.53
50.07
1.02
A
1
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
59.69
19
3.98
18
G. superba BF
14.73
1.79
0.04
A
9
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
36.46
24
ND
31
G. superba WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
336.60
0.04
8
8.61
41
ND
31
12
Pouzolzia pentandra ME
35.51
0.74
0.02
MA
24
>100
ND
ND
12
228.20
0.06
5
5.85
42
5.23
13
P. pentandra HF
18.36
1.44
0.03
A
11
>100
ND
ND
12
78.80
0.16
2
14.41
37
ND
31
P. pentandra MF
11.82
2.23
0.05
A
8
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
46.38
22
16.24
7
P. pentandra BF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
26.15
28
0.13
30
P. pentandra WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
5.30
44
ND
31
14
Rhinacanthus nasutus ME
30.91
0.85
0.02
MA
21
>100
ND
ND
12
264.10
0.05
7
13.72
38
12.76
8
R. nasutus HF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
130.60
0.10
3
17.39
33
ND
31
R. nasutus MF
4.90
5.38
0.11
A
3
>100
ND
ND
12
243.50
0.05
6
35.16
25
35.91
1
R. nasutus BF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
17.08
34
ND
31
R. nasutus WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
398.40
0.03
13
9.24
40
1.85
24
15
Senna alata ME
22.46
1.18
0.02
MA
18
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
67.68
16
21.84
6
S. alata HF
26.58
0.99
0.02
MA
19
>100
ND
ND
12
45.60
0.28
1
3.63
45
26.19
3
S. alata MF
5.75
4.59
0.09
A
5
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
112.97
12
33.73
2
S. alata BF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
362.70
0.04
10
86.89
13
1.40
26
S. alata WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
186.60
0.07
4
35.09
26
ND
31
19
Stemona
colinsae
ME
5.51
4.79
0.10
A
4
>100
ND
ND
12
391.70
0.03
12
27.45
27
1.69
25
S. colinsae HF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
24.08
30
ND
31
S. colinsae MF
14.73
1.79
0.04
A
9
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
44.83
23
4.82
14
S. colinsae BF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
16.82
35
ND
31
S. colinsae WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
436.00
0.03
15
5.83
43
ND
31
23
Ventilago denticulata ME
20.88
1.26
0.03
MA
16
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
83.73
14
10.08
9
V. denticulata HF
19.30
1.37
0.03
A
13
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
48.75
21
26.00
4
V. denticulata MF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
120.09
11
7.25
12
V. denticulata BF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
78.36
15
2.63
21
V. denticulata WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
343.20
0.04
9
25.14
29
ND
31
Standard
Cisplatin (C)
26.40
1.00
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Doxorubicin (D)
0.54
—
1.00
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
α-Tocopherol (T)
—
—
—
—
—
23.80
1.00
0.77
—
NT
ND
—
Ascorbic acid (A)
—
—
—
—
—
18.30
1.30
1.00
—
NT
ND
—
EDTA (E)
—
—
—
—
—
NT
ND
ND
—
12.90
1.00
—
Folds of the standard drug were calculated as the ratio between the IC50 value of the standard drug and samples. NCI criteria: NCI criteria indicated three types of the activity. A: active (IC50value was less than 20 µg/mL), MA: moderately active (IC50 value was between 20 and 100 µg/mL), and IA: inactive (IC50 value was more than 100 µg/mL). NT: not tested, ND: not determined.
ME: methanolic extract, HF:n-hexane fraction, MF: methanol-water fraction, BF: n-butanol fraction, and WF: water fraction.


### 3.2. Antioxidative Activities of 9 MEs and Their Fractions

The antioxidative activities of 9 MEs and their fractions were presented in Table2. The MF ofC. sappan exhibited the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity with the SC50 of 21.91 μg/mL which was 1.09- and 0.84-fold α-tocopherol (SC50 = 23.80 μg/mL) and ascorbic acid (SC50 = 18.30 μg/mL), respectively. HF ofS.alata gave the highest metal chelating activity with the CC50 of 45.60 μg/mL which was 0.28-fold EDTA, the standard chelating agent (CC50 = 12.90 μg/mL). Interestingly, the high phenolic and flavonoid contents were related to the strong antioxidative DPPH radical scavenging and metal chelating activities (Table 2). ME ofC.sappan showed the highest phenolic contents with the QE of 475.41 μg/mg, whereas the MF ofR.nasutus gave the highest flavonoid contents with the QE of 35.91 μg/mg.


### 3.3. Antiproliferative and Oxidative Activities of the Semipurified Fractions from HF ofV. denticulata

Only HF ofV.denticulata was further semipurified by column chromatography using polarity range solvents since the active constituents that are responsible for the potent antiproliferative activity have not been much investigated. The seven semipurified fractions were evaluated for antiproliferative activity (Table 3). The HF-2 fraction exhibited potent antiproliferative activity with the IC50 value of 6.49 μg/mL which was 2.97-, 4.07-, and 0.08-fold its HF, cisplatin, and doxorubicin, respectively. The HF-4 which gave the strongest metal chelating activity (CC50 = 158.45 μg/mL) with the highest phenolic (QE = 169.99 μg/mg) and flavonoid contents (QE = 556.54 μg/mg) was regarded as MA antiproliferative activity (IC50 = 59.60 μg/mL). Phenolic and flavonoid compounds might be responsible for the potent antiproliferative activity ofV. denticulata. The preparative HPLC of HF-2 ofV. denticulata yielded a single compound, emodin (60.6 mg, Rt 19.62 min) which was characterized by the 1H and 13C-NMR spectra comparing with the reference data [10, 11]. The chemical structure of emodin was shown in Figure 2. The spectral data of isolated compound was as follow.Table 3
Antiproliferative activity on HepG2 cell line, DPPH radical scavenging and metal chelating activities and total phenolic and flavonoid contents of 7 semipurified fractions from the HF ofV. denticulata ME.
Number
Extracts ofVentilago denticulata
Hep G2
DPPH
Chelating
Phenolic content
Flavonoid content
IC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
NCI criteria
Rank
SC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
Rank
CC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
Rank
QE (µg/mg)
Rank
QE (µg/mg)
Rank
C
D
T
A
E
1
ME
20.88
1.26
0.03
MA
3
>100
ND
ND
—
>500
ND
5
83.73
3
10.08
6
2
HF
19.30
1.37
0.03
A
2
>100
ND
ND
—
>500
ND
5
48.75
4
26.00
5
3
HF-1
>100
—
—
IA
5
>100
ND
ND
—
319.60
0.04
3
12.70
7
36.63
2
4
HF-2
6.49
4.07
0.08
A
1
>100
ND
ND
—
>500
ND
5
7.41
8
35.08
3
5
HF-3
>100
—
—
IA
5
>100
ND
ND
—
>500
ND
5
32.75
6
33.52
4
6
HF-4
59.60
0.44
0.01
MA
4
>100
ND
ND
—
158.45
0.08
1
169.99
1
556.54
1
7
HF-5
>100
—
—
IA
5
>100
ND
ND
—
216.40
0.06
2
108.97
2
ND
8
8
HF-6
>100
—
—
IA
5
>100
ND
ND
—
375.33
0.03
4
27.40
5
5.90
7
9
HF-7
>100
—
—
IA
5
>100
ND
ND
—
>500
ND
5
6.54
9
ND
8
Standard
Cisplatin (C)
26.40
1.00
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Doxorubicin (D)
0.54
—
1.00
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
α-Tocopherol (T)
—
—
—
—
—
23.80
1.00
0.77
—
NT
ND
—
Ascorbic acid (A)
—
—
—
—
—
18.30
1.30
1.00
—
NT
ND
—
EDTA (E)
—
—
—
—
—
NT
ND
ND
—
12.90
1.00
—
Folds of the standard drug were calculated as the ratio between the IC50 value of the standard drug and samples. NCI criteria: NCI criteria indicated three types of the activity. A: active (IC50value was less than 20 µg/mL), MA: moderately active (IC50 value was between 20 and 100 µg/mL), and IA: inactive (IC50 value was more than 100 µg/mL). NT: not tested, ND: not determined.
QE: quercetin equivalent.Figure 2
The structure of isolated compound from the HF-2 fraction ofV.denticulata stem.Emodin;1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.38 (s, 3H), 6.52 (d, J=1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (s, 1H), 7.11 (s, 1H), 7.43 (s, 1H), 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 21.96, 108.36, 108.98, 109.74, 113.83, 120.84, 124.53, 133.22, 135.46, 148.51, 161.83, 164.99, 166.84, 181.90, 189.75.


## 3.1. Antiproliferative Activity of the 23 Methanolic Plant Extracts

Botanical names, families, parts used, yields, and antiproliferative activity on Hep G2 cell line of the 23 Thai medicinal plant MEs were shown in Table1. According to the cytotoxicity activity criteria as established by the NCI, the IC50 values lower than 20 μg/mL, in the range of 20 to 100 μg/mL, and more than 100 μg/mL are regarded as active (A), moderately active (MA), and inactive (IA), respectively [9]. Only ME ofS. collinsae showed A activity with the highest antiproliferative activities (IC50 = 5.51 μg/mL) on HepG2 cell line which was 4.79- and 0.10-fold cisplatin and doxorubicin, respectively. Eight MEs ofG. superba (IC50 = 20.11 μg/mL),C. sappan (IC50 = 20.12 μg/mL),V. denticulata (IC50 = 20.88 μg/mL),S. alata (IC50 = 22.46 μg/mL),Rhinacanthus nasutus (IC50 = 30.91 μg/mL),Albizia chinensis (IC50 = 34.50 μg/mL),Pouzolzia pentandra (IC50 = 35.51 μg/mL), andFibraurea tinctoria (IC50 = 89.11 μg/mL) which gave the IC50 values of less than 100 μg/mL were regarded as MA. The A and MA MEs and their fractions were further fractionated, tested for antiproliferative activity of these 9 MEs, and summarized in Table 2. TheG. superba MF extract exhibited the highest antiproliferative activity with the IC50 value of 0.53 μg/mL (A) which was 37.79-, 50.07-, and 1.02-fold its ME, cisplatin, and doxorubicin, respectively.Table 2
Antiproliferative activity on HepG2 cell line, DPPH radical scavenging and metal chelating activities, total phenolic and flavonoid contents of 9 methanolic extracts (MEs) and 36 semipurified fractions of the 9 selected medicinal plants selected from Thai/Lanna medicinal plant recipe database “MANOSROI III.”
Plant number
Name of medicinal plant
Hep G2
DPPH
Chelating
Phenolic content
Flavonoid content
IC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
NCI criteria
Rank
SC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
Rank
CC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
Rank
QE (µg/mg)
Rank
QE (µg/mg)
Rank
C
D
T
A
E
3
Albizia chinensis ME
34.50
0.77
0.02
MA
23
59.30
0.40
0.31
8
>500
ND
16
218.51
6
0.81
28
A. chinensis HF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
435.60
0.03
14
12.98
39
ND
31
A. chinensis MF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
40.20
0.59
0.46
4
>500
ND
16
149.17
9
3.95
19
A. chinensis BF
10.80
2.44
0.05
A
7
47.30
0.50
0.39
6
>500
ND
16
323.63
3
2.13
23
A. chinensis WF
31.50
0.84
0.02
MA
22
87.60
0.27
0.21
11
>500
ND
16
122.73
10
1.13
27
4
Caesalpinia sappan ME
20.12
1.31
0.03
MA
14
26.00
0.92
0.70
2
>500
ND
16
475.41
1
22.39
5
C. sappan HF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
22.90
31
ND
31
C. sappan MF
27.11
0.97
0.02
MA
20
21.91
1.09
0.84
1
>500
ND
16
61.58
18
9.61
10
C. sappan BF
9.97
2.65
0.05
A
6
26.60
0.89
0.69
3
>500
ND
16
361.69
2
4.62
15
C. sappan WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
64.16
17
0.59
29
6
Fibraurea tinctoria ME
89.11
0.30
0.01
MA
25
43.20
0.55
0.42
5
>500
ND
16
305.17
4
2.32
22
F. tinctoria HF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
367.30
0.04
11
16.14
36
ND
31
F. tinctoriaMF
19.11
1.38
0.03
A
12
51.10
0.47
0.36
7
>500
ND
16
155.36
8
4.15
17
F. tinctoria BF
21.33
1.24
0.03
MA
17
76.40
0.31
0.24
10
>500
ND
16
260.24
5
4.57
16
F. tinctoria WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
62.40
0.38
0.29
9
>500
ND
16
175.41
7
3.91
20
7
Gloriosa superba ME
20.11
1.31
0.03
MA
14
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
52.83
20
8.32
11
G. superba HF
3.82
6.91
0.14
A
2
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
20.00
32
ND
31
G. superba MF
0.53
50.07
1.02
A
1
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
59.69
19
3.98
18
G. superba BF
14.73
1.79
0.04
A
9
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
36.46
24
ND
31
G. superba WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
336.60
0.04
8
8.61
41
ND
31
12
Pouzolzia pentandra ME
35.51
0.74
0.02
MA
24
>100
ND
ND
12
228.20
0.06
5
5.85
42
5.23
13
P. pentandra HF
18.36
1.44
0.03
A
11
>100
ND
ND
12
78.80
0.16
2
14.41
37
ND
31
P. pentandra MF
11.82
2.23
0.05
A
8
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
46.38
22
16.24
7
P. pentandra BF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
26.15
28
0.13
30
P. pentandra WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
5.30
44
ND
31
14
Rhinacanthus nasutus ME
30.91
0.85
0.02
MA
21
>100
ND
ND
12
264.10
0.05
7
13.72
38
12.76
8
R. nasutus HF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
130.60
0.10
3
17.39
33
ND
31
R. nasutus MF
4.90
5.38
0.11
A
3
>100
ND
ND
12
243.50
0.05
6
35.16
25
35.91
1
R. nasutus BF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
17.08
34
ND
31
R. nasutus WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
398.40
0.03
13
9.24
40
1.85
24
15
Senna alata ME
22.46
1.18
0.02
MA
18
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
67.68
16
21.84
6
S. alata HF
26.58
0.99
0.02
MA
19
>100
ND
ND
12
45.60
0.28
1
3.63
45
26.19
3
S. alata MF
5.75
4.59
0.09
A
5
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
112.97
12
33.73
2
S. alata BF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
362.70
0.04
10
86.89
13
1.40
26
S. alata WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
186.60
0.07
4
35.09
26
ND
31
19
Stemona
colinsae
ME
5.51
4.79
0.10
A
4
>100
ND
ND
12
391.70
0.03
12
27.45
27
1.69
25
S. colinsae HF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
24.08
30
ND
31
S. colinsae MF
14.73
1.79
0.04
A
9
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
44.83
23
4.82
14
S. colinsae BF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
16.82
35
ND
31
S. colinsae WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
436.00
0.03
15
5.83
43
ND
31
23
Ventilago denticulata ME
20.88
1.26
0.03
MA
16
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
83.73
14
10.08
9
V. denticulata HF
19.30
1.37
0.03
A
13
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
48.75
21
26.00
4
V. denticulata MF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
120.09
11
7.25
12
V. denticulata BF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
>500
ND
16
78.36
15
2.63
21
V. denticulata WF
>100
ND
ND
IA
26
>100
ND
ND
12
343.20
0.04
9
25.14
29
ND
31
Standard
Cisplatin (C)
26.40
1.00
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Doxorubicin (D)
0.54
—
1.00
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
α-Tocopherol (T)
—
—
—
—
—
23.80
1.00
0.77
—
NT
ND
—
Ascorbic acid (A)
—
—
—
—
—
18.30
1.30
1.00
—
NT
ND
—
EDTA (E)
—
—
—
—
—
NT
ND
ND
—
12.90
1.00
—
Folds of the standard drug were calculated as the ratio between the IC50 value of the standard drug and samples. NCI criteria: NCI criteria indicated three types of the activity. A: active (IC50value was less than 20 µg/mL), MA: moderately active (IC50 value was between 20 and 100 µg/mL), and IA: inactive (IC50 value was more than 100 µg/mL). NT: not tested, ND: not determined.
ME: methanolic extract, HF:n-hexane fraction, MF: methanol-water fraction, BF: n-butanol fraction, and WF: water fraction.


## 3.2. Antioxidative Activities of 9 MEs and Their Fractions

The antioxidative activities of 9 MEs and their fractions were presented in Table2. The MF ofC. sappan exhibited the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity with the SC50 of 21.91 μg/mL which was 1.09- and 0.84-fold α-tocopherol (SC50 = 23.80 μg/mL) and ascorbic acid (SC50 = 18.30 μg/mL), respectively. HF ofS.alata gave the highest metal chelating activity with the CC50 of 45.60 μg/mL which was 0.28-fold EDTA, the standard chelating agent (CC50 = 12.90 μg/mL). Interestingly, the high phenolic and flavonoid contents were related to the strong antioxidative DPPH radical scavenging and metal chelating activities (Table 2). ME ofC.sappan showed the highest phenolic contents with the QE of 475.41 μg/mg, whereas the MF ofR.nasutus gave the highest flavonoid contents with the QE of 35.91 μg/mg.


## 3.3. Antiproliferative and Oxidative Activities of the Semipurified Fractions from HF ofV. denticulata

Only HF ofV.denticulata was further semipurified by column chromatography using polarity range solvents since the active constituents that are responsible for the potent antiproliferative activity have not been much investigated. The seven semipurified fractions were evaluated for antiproliferative activity (Table 3). The HF-2 fraction exhibited potent antiproliferative activity with the IC50 value of 6.49 μg/mL which was 2.97-, 4.07-, and 0.08-fold its HF, cisplatin, and doxorubicin, respectively. The HF-4 which gave the strongest metal chelating activity (CC50 = 158.45 μg/mL) with the highest phenolic (QE = 169.99 μg/mg) and flavonoid contents (QE = 556.54 μg/mg) was regarded as MA antiproliferative activity (IC50 = 59.60 μg/mL). Phenolic and flavonoid compounds might be responsible for the potent antiproliferative activity ofV. denticulata. The preparative HPLC of HF-2 ofV. denticulata yielded a single compound, emodin (60.6 mg, Rt 19.62 min) which was characterized by the 1H and 13C-NMR spectra comparing with the reference data [10, 11]. The chemical structure of emodin was shown in Figure 2. The spectral data of isolated compound was as follow.Table 3
Antiproliferative activity on HepG2 cell line, DPPH radical scavenging and metal chelating activities and total phenolic and flavonoid contents of 7 semipurified fractions from the HF ofV. denticulata ME.
Number
Extracts ofVentilago denticulata
Hep G2
DPPH
Chelating
Phenolic content
Flavonoid content
IC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
NCI criteria
Rank
SC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
Rank
CC50 (µg/mL)
Folds of
Rank
QE (µg/mg)
Rank
QE (µg/mg)
Rank
C
D
T
A
E
1
ME
20.88
1.26
0.03
MA
3
>100
ND
ND
—
>500
ND
5
83.73
3
10.08
6
2
HF
19.30
1.37
0.03
A
2
>100
ND
ND
—
>500
ND
5
48.75
4
26.00
5
3
HF-1
>100
—
—
IA
5
>100
ND
ND
—
319.60
0.04
3
12.70
7
36.63
2
4
HF-2
6.49
4.07
0.08
A
1
>100
ND
ND
—
>500
ND
5
7.41
8
35.08
3
5
HF-3
>100
—
—
IA
5
>100
ND
ND
—
>500
ND
5
32.75
6
33.52
4
6
HF-4
59.60
0.44
0.01
MA
4
>100
ND
ND
—
158.45
0.08
1
169.99
1
556.54
1
7
HF-5
>100
—
—
IA
5
>100
ND
ND
—
216.40
0.06
2
108.97
2
ND
8
8
HF-6
>100
—
—
IA
5
>100
ND
ND
—
375.33
0.03
4
27.40
5
5.90
7
9
HF-7
>100
—
—
IA
5
>100
ND
ND
—
>500
ND
5
6.54
9
ND
8
Standard
Cisplatin (C)
26.40
1.00
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Doxorubicin (D)
0.54
—
1.00
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
α-Tocopherol (T)
—
—
—
—
—
23.80
1.00
0.77
—
NT
ND
—
Ascorbic acid (A)
—
—
—
—
—
18.30
1.30
1.00
—
NT
ND
—
EDTA (E)
—
—
—
—
—
NT
ND
ND
—
12.90
1.00
—
Folds of the standard drug were calculated as the ratio between the IC50 value of the standard drug and samples. NCI criteria: NCI criteria indicated three types of the activity. A: active (IC50value was less than 20 µg/mL), MA: moderately active (IC50 value was between 20 and 100 µg/mL), and IA: inactive (IC50 value was more than 100 µg/mL). NT: not tested, ND: not determined.
QE: quercetin equivalent.Figure 2
The structure of isolated compound from the HF-2 fraction ofV.denticulata stem.Emodin;1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.38 (s, 3H), 6.52 (d, J=1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (s, 1H), 7.11 (s, 1H), 7.43 (s, 1H), 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 21.96, 108.36, 108.98, 109.74, 113.83, 120.84, 124.53, 133.22, 135.46, 148.51, 161.83, 164.99, 166.84, 181.90, 189.75.


## 4. Discussion

Twenty-three plants were found in high frequency in the anticancer recipes which were selected from the “MANOSROI III” database. Although most recipes were traditionally prepared by boiling with water, in this study these 23 plants were extracted by methanol, a high polarity range solvent under reflux. Then, the wide polarity range of constituents comparing with the water extract will be obtained. The anticancer activities of phytochemicals in some of the 23 plants have been previously reported. Saponins isolated fromA.chinensis stem bark extract had cytotoxic activity on human colon, hepatoma, lung, and gastric cancer cell lines [12]. Brazilin (homoisoflavonoid) from the heartwood ofC. sappan showed antiproliferative activity against human glioblastoma cells (U87) via apoptosis induction [13]. Thiocolchicoside (colchicinoidal compounds) from the plantG. superba exhibited anticancer activity against leukemia, myeloma, squamous cell carcinoma, breast, colon, and kidney cancer cells through inhibition of NF-κB and NF-κB regulated gene products [14]. Rhinacanthin-C (naphthoquinone esters) from the roots ofR. nasutus gave antiproliferative activity against panel of 10 kinds of cancer cells (KB, Hep-2, MCF-7, HepG2, HeLa SiHa, C-32, LLC, Colon-26, and P388) together with antitumor activity in Meth-A sarcoma bearing mice [15].As shown in Table1, the ME ofS.collinsae exhibited the highest antiproliferative activity on HepG2 cell line. According to the NCI criteria, 1 (4.34%) and 8 (34.78%) out of 23 plants were considered as A and MA of antiproliferative activity, respectively, whereas other 14 plant extracts did not exhibit any activity, even though they were the composition of the anticancer recipes. These plants might have activity on other cancers, but not on HepG2 cell line or have other supporting or synergistic effects for cancer treatment, such as antitumor and anti-inflammatory activities or reduced the toxicity of other plants. It has been previously reported thatC.fistula seed extracts have antitumor activity in Ehrlich ascites carcinoma [16], whereasA. ebracteatus showed anti-inflammatory activities [17]. The medicinal plants in the recipe N040 such asC. sappan,A. chinensis, andSida rhombifolia which showed potent antiproliferative activity on HeLa (human cervical adenocarcinoma) cell have been reported to have antiproliferative effect. The antiproliferative activity of the recipe N040 might be due to the bioactive compounds from the mixed medicinal plants in the recipe [18].After fractionation, all fractions from MEs of the 9 selected plants exceptS.collinsae showed higher antiproliferative activity than their corresponding MEs. Although the fraction fromS.collinsae gave lower activity than its ME, its activity was still in the A range. This study indicated that liquid-liquid partition technique appeared to be a suitable purification method to obtain the active anticancer fraction. In Table 2, MF ofG.superba indicated the highest activity. The activity might be mainly due to the colchicine of the plant in the nonpolar fractions [14, 19]. No study on the highly polar fractions of the methanolic extract of this plant has been reported. In this study, not only has the nonpolar fraction (HF) of this plant been investigated, but the higher-polar fraction (BF) which exhibited the high antiproliferative activities on HepG2 cell line was also described.For antioxidative activities, MF ofC.sappan exhibited the highest DPPH radical scavenging activities. In fact, the similar antioxidative and anticancer activities ofC.sappan have been previously reported [20, 21]. One of the major components ofC.sappan heartwood was homoisoflavanoids [22–24]. HF ofS.alata showed the highest metal chelating activity. The nonpolar constituents such as flavonoids ofS.alata seemed to play a role for the metal chelating activity. Phenolic compounds such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, and tannins are attributed to the antioxidative effect ofS. alata [25]. ME ofC.sappan and MF ofR.nasutus indicated the highest phenolic and flavonoid contents, respectively. As known, phenolic compounds such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, and tannins are considered as the major contributor to the antioxidative property of vegetables, fruits, or medicinal plants. The antioxidative activity of the phenolic compounds was attributed to its redox properties, which allowed them to act as reducing agents, hydrogen donators, singlet oxygen quenchers, and also metal chelating properties [26]. The strong DPPH radical scavenging and metal chelating activities of ME ofC.sappan and MF ofR. nasutus might be from the presence of phenolic compounds and flavonoids.Twelve out of 36 fractions of the 9 selected plants were regarded as A antiproliferative activity (Table2). The active compounds in some plants which were responsible for the potent antiproliferative activity have been reported. Colchicine fromG. superba, brazilin and brazilein (homoisoflavonoids) fromC. sappan, and rhinacanthin-C (naphthoquinone esters) fromR. nasutus have been reported as active compounds responsible for the antiproliferative activity of their MEs and fractions [13–15, 27]. Besides, stemofoline (stemona alkaloids) fromS. collinsae has been reported as chemosensitizer agents that increase chemosensitivity in the treatment of multidrug-resistant cancers [28]. However, the antiproliferative constituents inV.denticulata were not clearly identified, whereas anthraquinones have been found in this plant [29]. This study has been the first description of antiproliferative activity ofV.denticulata on human hepatoma cell line (Hep G2). HF ofV.denticulata which indicated improved activity comparing to its ME was further semipurified. In Table 3, HF-2 fraction exhibited the highest antiproliferative activity with 4.07- and 0.08-fold cisplatin and doxorubicin, respectively, whereas the HF-4 fraction gave the highest metal chelating activity and contained the highest phenolic and flavonoid contents. By preparative HPLC of HF-2 fraction, emodin was isolated as the major constituent. Emodin and its derivatives have been reported as the major constituents of the root bark ofV. denticulata [30]. The antiproliferative activity on HepG2 cell line of emodin with the GI50 of 13.1 μM (3.4 μg/mL) has been indicated [31]. Also, emodin has been shown to have ability to induce the apoptosis on HepG2 and HeLa cell lines [32–34]. Hence, emodin may be responsible for the potent antiproliferative activity on HepG2 cell line. This present study has first described the antiproliferative activity of emodin in Hep G2 cell line. However, the anticancer activity against Hep G2 cell line of emodin isolated fromV. denticulata in animals has never been reported. Hence, thein vivo anticancer activity using Hep G2 cell xenograft nude mice model will be further investigated.


## 5. Conclusion

The antiproliferative activity on Hep G2 cell line of the 23 medicinal plants selected from the “MANOSROI III” database was investigated. Among the 23 MEs,S.collinsae root extract showed potent with the highest antiproliferative activity in HepG2 cell line at 4.79- and 0.10-fold cisplatin and doxorubicin, respectively. After liquid-liquid partition of the selected 9 MEs, MF ofG.superba gave the highest antiproliferative activity at 50.07- and 1.02-fold cisplatin and doxorubicin, respectively. The 9 selected plants, exceptS.collinsae, indicated higher antiproliferative activity than their corresponding MEs. The highest DPPH free radical scavenging (1.09-fold α-tocopherol) and metal chelating activities (0.28-fold EDTA) were observed in MF ofC. sappan and HF ofS. alata, respectively. After purification of HF ofV.denticulata, emodin was isolated. This compound seemed to be responsible for the antiproliferative activity ofV.denticulata. This study has confirmed not only the traditional use of the Thai/Lanna medicinal plant recipes for cancer treatments, but also the potential of plants selected from these recipes for the further development to modern anticancer drug with antioxidative activities.



---

*Source: 397181-2015-06-07.xml*