# DietarySaccharomyces cerevisiae Cell Wall Extract Supplementation Alleviates Oxidative Stress and Modulates Serum Amino Acids Profiles in Weaned Piglets

Authors: Gang Liu; Lei Yu; Yordan Martínez; Wenkai Ren; Hengjia Ni; Naif Abdullah Al-Dhabi; Veeramuthu Duraipandiyan; Yulong Yin
Journal: Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the effects of dietary supplementation withSaccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract (SCCWE) on growth performance, oxidative stress, intestinal morphology, and serum amino acid concentration in weaned piglets. Utilizing a completely randomized design, 40 healthy piglets weaned at 21 d were grouped into 4 experimental treatments with 10 pigs per treatment group. Treatments consisted of a basal diet (T0), a basal diet with a 0.05% SCCWE (T1), a basal diet with a 0.10% SCCWE (T2), and a basal diet with a 0.15% SCCWE (T3). SCCWE supplementation increased the average daily gain and final body weight compared with T0 (P<0.05). SCCWE in T2 and T3 improved the average daily feed intake and decreased the feed/gain ratio compared with T1 and T2 (P<0.05). SCCWE decreased serum malondialdehyde (MDA) and increased activities of catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) significantly compared to T0 (P<0.05). SCCWE increased the concentration of Ile compared to T0 (P<0.05). Moreover, the concentrations of Leu, Phe, and Arg were higher in T2 and T3 (P<0.05). These findings indicate beneficial effects of SCCWE supplementation on growth performance, the concentration of some essential amino acids, and alleviation of oxidative stress in weaned piglets.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Weaning is the most important stress in the pig farming industry, and it deeply affects gut health and the immune system. During the first weeks after weaning, piglets need to adjust to solid feed [1]. As a consequence, weaning may result in decreased feed intake, and piglets may undergo serious diarrhea and immune dysfunction. In weaned piglets, environmental factors can also result in oxidative stress. When the environment changes, the balance between oxidation and antioxidation is disturbed, resulting in mass production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the body, eventually leading to oxidative stress. ROS such as superoxide and H2O2 [2, 3] are constantly produced from oxygen during the body’s metabolic processes. Under normal conditions, ROS are maintained at certain levels, and excessive oxidative radicals are usually removed by a series of antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD).Yeast cell wall is rich in prebiotics and has been studied in pig production, mainly focusing on its effects on growth performance, immune modulation, and microbiology [4–6]. As a result, several reports have suggested that it is capable of promoting growth performance. However, the animal response results are relatively variable [4]. Li and Kim have demonstrated that supplementation with 0.10% SCCWE improved the growth performance and digestibility, modulated the fecal microbiota, and decreased the emissions of fecal gas in growing pigs [7]. However, Sauerwein et al. found that feeding pigs with SCCWE did not increase growth performance and that the immunomodulatory response was mild [4].However, to our knowledge, only a few investigations have been conducted involving yeast extract on piglet diets, with the purpose of finding ways to reconcile the scientific contradictions on the topic. We hypothesized that dietary supplementation withSaccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract could improve growth performance by decreasing oxidative stress and increasing the circulation of nutrients and intestinal health in piglets. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dietarySaccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract supplementation on growth performance, oxidative stress, intestinal morphology, and serum amino acid concentration in weaned piglets.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Animal, Housing, and Treatment

The experiment conformed to the guidelines for animal welfare and experimental protocol of the Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences. A total of 40 healthy piglets [(Yorkshire × Landrace) × Duroc] weaned at 21 d were obtained from a local commercial swine herd. Piglets were randomly grouped into four groups based on their body weight (BW) and placed into 40 pens (length, 0.5 m; width, 0.4 m; height, 0.5 m) with 10 replicates per group [8].After a five-day adjustment, piglets were separately fed with one of four kinds of diets (Table1): basal diet (T0), basal diet + 0.05%Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract (T1), basal diet + 0.10%Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract (T2), and basal diet + 0.15%Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract (T3). TheSaccharomyces cerevisiaecell wall extract (Antaferm-MG; Dr. Eckel GmbH, Niederzissen, Germany) was prepared according to a previous study [4]. These diets were formulated to meet or exceed the NRC (2012) nutrient specifications for pigs weighing 5 to 20 kg and had similar ingredients and nutrient levels. All piglets were given free access to feed and water for 21 d.Table 1
Dietary ingredients and nutrient levels in the diets (as fed).
Ingredients (g kg−1)
T0
T1
T2
T3
Corn
530.0
529.5
529.0
528.5
Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract
—
0.5
1.0
1.5
Soybean meal
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
Wheat bean
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Fish meal
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Soybean oil
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Dried porcine soluble
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Sucrose
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
Glucose
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
Lysine
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Threonine
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
Salt
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Limestone
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
Calcium hydrophosphate
22.0
22.0
22.0
22.0
Premix†
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Calculated composition
Digestive energy (MJ kg−1)
14.8
14.8
14.8
14.8
Crude protein (g kg−1)
215.0
215.0
215.0
215.0
Calcium (g kg−1)
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
Phosphorus (g kg−1)
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
†Supplied per kg diet: 10 mg copper; 100 mg iron; 0.3 mg sodium; 100 mg zinc; 10 mg manganese; 386 IU cholecalciferol; 3086 IU retinyl acetate; 15.4 IU all-rac-α-tocopheryl acetate; 2.3 mg menadione; 3.9 mg riboflavin; 15.4 mg D-pantothenic acid; 23 mg niacin; 77 mg choline; and 15.4 μg cyanocobalamin.


### 2.2. Growth Performance and Diarrhea Rate

The initial and final body weights and feed consumption were recorded during the whole trial. Based on these data, the average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed/gain (F : G) ratio were calculated according to the method of Liu et al. [9].The diarrhea rate for the piglets was calculated as follows:(1)Diarrhearate=numberofpigletswithdiarrhea×numberofdaysofdiarrheatotalnumberofpiglets×numberofdaysofexperiment×100%.


### 2.3. Serum Antioxidative Enzymes and Amino Acids

On day 21 of the trial, 10 mL of blood was drawn from the jugular vein into plastic uncoated tubes. After collection, blood samples were centrifuged at 8,000 rpm and 4°C for 10 min. Serum was then collected and frozen at −20°C for further analysis. MDA, CAT, GPx, and SOD were analyzed with kits purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A 7.5% trichloroacetic acid solution (2.5 mL) was added to 1 mL serum and mixed thoroughly. This mixture was centrifuged at 12000 rpm and 4°C for 15 min. The supernatant was collected and applied to an ion-exchange AA analyzer (Hitachi L-8900 Auto-Analyzer, Tokyo, Japan) for the determination of amino acids.


### 2.4. Sampling and Morphological Analyses

At the end of the experiment, all piglets were killed and small intestine samples were collected. For histomorphological analysis, the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum tissues (5 cm) were fixed with 10% formalin in PBS at 4°C, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, and then embedded in paraffin wax. Then, they were sectioned at 5μm thickness and mounted on slides; this was followed by dewaxing, hydrating, and staining the tissues with Hematoxylin-Eosin. The villus height (VH) and crypt depth (CD) were measured using an Axiostar plus microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The VH/CD ratio (VCR) was then calculated.


### 2.5. Statistical Analyses

The results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Duncan’s multiple range test was used to compare differences among different groups.P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


## 2.1. Animal, Housing, and Treatment

The experiment conformed to the guidelines for animal welfare and experimental protocol of the Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences. A total of 40 healthy piglets [(Yorkshire × Landrace) × Duroc] weaned at 21 d were obtained from a local commercial swine herd. Piglets were randomly grouped into four groups based on their body weight (BW) and placed into 40 pens (length, 0.5 m; width, 0.4 m; height, 0.5 m) with 10 replicates per group [8].After a five-day adjustment, piglets were separately fed with one of four kinds of diets (Table1): basal diet (T0), basal diet + 0.05%Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract (T1), basal diet + 0.10%Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract (T2), and basal diet + 0.15%Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract (T3). TheSaccharomyces cerevisiaecell wall extract (Antaferm-MG; Dr. Eckel GmbH, Niederzissen, Germany) was prepared according to a previous study [4]. These diets were formulated to meet or exceed the NRC (2012) nutrient specifications for pigs weighing 5 to 20 kg and had similar ingredients and nutrient levels. All piglets were given free access to feed and water for 21 d.Table 1
Dietary ingredients and nutrient levels in the diets (as fed).
Ingredients (g kg−1)
T0
T1
T2
T3
Corn
530.0
529.5
529.0
528.5
Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract
—
0.5
1.0
1.5
Soybean meal
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
Wheat bean
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Fish meal
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Soybean oil
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Dried porcine soluble
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Sucrose
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
Glucose
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
Lysine
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Threonine
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
Salt
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Limestone
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
Calcium hydrophosphate
22.0
22.0
22.0
22.0
Premix†
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Calculated composition
Digestive energy (MJ kg−1)
14.8
14.8
14.8
14.8
Crude protein (g kg−1)
215.0
215.0
215.0
215.0
Calcium (g kg−1)
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
Phosphorus (g kg−1)
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
†Supplied per kg diet: 10 mg copper; 100 mg iron; 0.3 mg sodium; 100 mg zinc; 10 mg manganese; 386 IU cholecalciferol; 3086 IU retinyl acetate; 15.4 IU all-rac-α-tocopheryl acetate; 2.3 mg menadione; 3.9 mg riboflavin; 15.4 mg D-pantothenic acid; 23 mg niacin; 77 mg choline; and 15.4 μg cyanocobalamin.


## 2.2. Growth Performance and Diarrhea Rate

The initial and final body weights and feed consumption were recorded during the whole trial. Based on these data, the average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed/gain (F : G) ratio were calculated according to the method of Liu et al. [9].The diarrhea rate for the piglets was calculated as follows:(1)Diarrhearate=numberofpigletswithdiarrhea×numberofdaysofdiarrheatotalnumberofpiglets×numberofdaysofexperiment×100%.


## 2.3. Serum Antioxidative Enzymes and Amino Acids

On day 21 of the trial, 10 mL of blood was drawn from the jugular vein into plastic uncoated tubes. After collection, blood samples were centrifuged at 8,000 rpm and 4°C for 10 min. Serum was then collected and frozen at −20°C for further analysis. MDA, CAT, GPx, and SOD were analyzed with kits purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A 7.5% trichloroacetic acid solution (2.5 mL) was added to 1 mL serum and mixed thoroughly. This mixture was centrifuged at 12000 rpm and 4°C for 15 min. The supernatant was collected and applied to an ion-exchange AA analyzer (Hitachi L-8900 Auto-Analyzer, Tokyo, Japan) for the determination of amino acids.


## 2.4. Sampling and Morphological Analyses

At the end of the experiment, all piglets were killed and small intestine samples were collected. For histomorphological analysis, the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum tissues (5 cm) were fixed with 10% formalin in PBS at 4°C, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, and then embedded in paraffin wax. Then, they were sectioned at 5μm thickness and mounted on slides; this was followed by dewaxing, hydrating, and staining the tissues with Hematoxylin-Eosin. The villus height (VH) and crypt depth (CD) were measured using an Axiostar plus microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The VH/CD ratio (VCR) was then calculated.


## 2.5. Statistical Analyses

The results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Duncan’s multiple range test was used to compare differences among different groups.P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


## 3. Results

Data on the effect of dietary supplementation withSaccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract (SCCWE) on growth performance and diarrhea rate are presented in Table 2. SCCWE supplementation increased the final BW and ADG and reduced the diarrhea rate compared with T0 (P<0.05). Similarly, T2 and T3 improved the ADFI (P<0.05); meanwhile, T1 did not differ significantly with T0 (P>0.05). The feed/gain ratio decreased in T1 and T2 compared to T0 (P<0.05). However, the feed/gain ratio of T0 and T3 were not significantly different (P>0.05).Table 2
Effect of dietary supplementation with extract ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall on growth performance and diarrhea rate in weaned piglets.
Items
T0
T1
T2
T3
SEM±
P value
Initial BW (kg)
5.76
5.76
5.75
5.75
0.43
0.88
Final BW (kg)
12.75b
13.34a
13.65a
13.60a
0.56
0.042
ADG (g)
333.0b
361.0a
376.0a
374.0a
49.0
0.035
ADFI (g d−1)
536.0b
549.0ab
568.0a
583.0a
63.0
0.018
F/G
1.61b
1.52a
1.51a
1.56ab
0.11
0.036
Diarrhea rate (%)
21.60
18.75
17.45
18.24
a
,
bMeans in the same row with different superscripts are significant (P<0.05).Data on MDA, CAT, SOD, and GPx are shown in Table3. Compared with the control group, SCCWE supplementation decreased MDA in the serum (P<0.05), while SCCWE supplementation in T1, T2, and T3 increased CAT, SOD, and GPx (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences among T1, T2, and T3 (P>0.05).Table 3
Effect of dietary supplementation with extract ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall on MDA and antioxidative enzymes.
Items
T0
T1
T2
T3
SEM±
P value
MDA (nmol/mL)
1.83a
1.45b
1.51b
1.48b
0.12
0.035
CAT (U/mL)
125.8a
143.2b
152.1b
150.4b
8.5
0.030
SOD (U/mL)
68.50a
75.1b
77.4.0b
77.8b
5.4
0.038
GPx (U/mL)
630.8a
734.3b
728.4b
719.2b
43.6
0.011
a
,
bMeans in the same row with different superscripts are significant (P<0.05).On day 21 (Table4), the concentrations of Ile, Leu, Phe, and Arg were changed by the effect of experimental treatments with SCCWE. The other amino acids did not show significant differences between groups (P>0.05). SCCWE supplementation up to 0.15% increased the concentration of Ile compared to T0 (P<0.05). Moreover, the levels of Leu and Phe were higher in T2 and T3 compared to T0 and T1 (P<0.05). Additionally, T2 and T3 increased the concentration of Arg compared to T0 (P<0.05).Table 4
Effect of dietary supplementation with extract ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall on serum amino acids concentration (μg/mL) in weaned piglets.
Items
T0
T1
T2
T3
SEM±
P value
Asp
19.07
18.63
19.12
18.96
1.32
0.457
Thr
71.90
70.63
72.94
71.55
3.52
0.675
Ser
40.01
42.32
41.48
40.96
1.86
0.447
Glu
102.77
103.56
103.27
102.96
8.12
0.463
Gly
84.30
78.85
83.28
85.96
7.54
0.521
Ala
143.24
155.32
147.25
148.62
7.63
0.216
Val
37.26
33.65
38.62
35.48
7.49
0.345
Met
91.47
88.74
92.13
86.61
8.65
0.425
Ile
24.63b
30.61a
31.57a
32.11a
2.56
0.033
Leu
49.88c
56.86b
66.81a
68.32a
2.31
0.014
Tyr
37.74
35.26
35.22
34.67
2.69
0.532
Phe
29.41c
32.41b
36.65a
37.21a
1.85
0.023
Lys
40.20
42.63
41.56
42.44
3.29
0.336
His
13.57
14.36
13.99
14.11
0.98
0.445
Arg
35.80b
39.52ab
43.67a
42.19a
3.11
0.043
a
,
b
,
cMeans in the same row with different superscripts are significant (P<0.05).Table5 shows the effect ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract supplementation on small intestinal morphology in weaned piglets. The villus height of the jejunum and ileum increased gradually (P<0.05) with SCCWE supplementation. However, the duodenum villus height did not show significant differences (P>0.05) among treatments. Similarly, SCCWE supplementation did not change (P>0.05) the crypt depth of the previously mentioned intestinal regions (Table 5). Nevertheless, the villus height : crypt depth ratio in jejunum and ileum increased significantly in T3 (P>0.05) compared with T0.Table 5
Effect of dietary supplementation with extract ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall on small intestinal morphology.
Items
T0
T1
T2
T3
SEM±
P value
Villus height,μm
Duodenum
398.6
403.6
406.8
406.5
9.12
0.153
Jejunum
399.1c
406.2b
413.4a
412.7a
10.58
0.024
Ileum
328.6c
348.2b
353.9a
352.1a
15.32
0.013
Crypt depth,μm
Duodenum
217.3
213.4
213.9
212.8
12.44
0.541
Jejunum
221.4
218.3
219.6
216.5
8.36
0.459
Ileum
208.1
206.5
205.7
206.4
7.65
0.612
Villus height: crypt depth
Duodenum
1.83
1.89
1.90
1.91
0.12
0.217
Jejunum
1.80b
1.86ab
1.88ab
1.91a
0.08
0.035
Ileum
1.58b
1.69ab
1.72ab
1.71a
0.10
0.028
a
,
b
,
cMeans in the same row with different superscripts are significant (P<0.05).


## 4. Discussion

Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast is a rich source of prebiotics, mainly β-glucan. Several studies have reported beneficial effects of β-glucans on growth performance and health in pigs. Kogan and Kocher found that SCCWE polysaccharides (mainly β-glucan) can modulate immunity and the absorption of mycotoxin, prevent the adhesion and dissemination of bacteria, and finally improve the health of pigs [10]. Additionally, Sweeney et al. showed that oral administration of β-glucans extracted fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae increased the growth performance of piglets [11]. Additionally, Li and Kim reported an increase in BW and feed intake in growing pigs fed with SCCWE, attributed to its beneficial effect on lactic acid bacteria [7]. The present results showing thatSaccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract supplementation up to 0.15% led to the highest BW suggest that this product may enhance the growth performance of pigs, a finding corroborated by Li and Kim [7], who attributed these responses to its beneficial effects on immunity, microbiology, feed intake, and digestion. Thus, our results find a growth promoting effect ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract in piglets.Another novel and important point in this study is that SCCWE supplementation reduces the diarrhea rate in weaned piglets (Table2). Diarrheal syndrome, which causes the loss of water and electrolytes in semiliquid and liquid feces, occurs mainly due to the proliferation ofEscherichia coli and other pathogenic bacteria in the gut after weaning [12]. There is a relationship between fecal pH, the intestinal microflora population, and the diarrhea rate of pigs [13]. Stabilization of intestinal pH at a reasonably low level and maintaining an optimal balance of intestinal microbiota both play major roles in decreasing the diarrhea rate [14].β-Glucans are capable of activating the innate immune system, thereby reinforcing defense barriers and preventing pathogen infection. Some studies report that the polysaccharides in yeast cell wall have been used against various bacterial infections and yeast, fungal, viral, and parasitic diseases. In this sense, Stuyven et al. testified that β-glucans fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae as a feed ingredient could protect against an ETEC infection [15]. Moreover, Li and Kim found a decrease ofEscherichia coli and an increase ofLactobacillus when they used SCCWE and poplar propolis ethanol extract in pig diets [7]. Thus, considering our result that SCCWE supplementation greater than 0.05% decreased the diarrhea rate (Table 2), we can affirm an antidiarrheal effect of yeast cell wall extract in weaned piglets. However, studies in which (1-3)(1-6)-β-glucans are tested to protect piglets against diarrheal syndrome in pigs are few.Many factors could contribute to cell damage due to oxidative stress in pig production. Oxidative stress may lead to worsening health status and decreased growth performance, as Yuan et al. described that growth performance was impaired in piglets under oxidative stress [16]. In the present study, the concentration of MDA in plasma was also higher in T0 than T1, T2, and T3. MDA is a metabolite produced after lipid peroxidation, and with the thiobarbituric acid assay, we can analyze lipid peroxidation and products. Cat, SOD, and GPx are the main antioxidant enzymes that can be used to monitor antioxidative capability in piglets [17]. In this research, the activities of these enzymes in serum were significantly increased in the SCCWE groups, suggesting that the antioxidative capabilities of piglets were increased. Moreover, we found that dietary supplementation of SCCWE significantly decreased the concentration of MDA, indicating that supplementation of SCCWE can effectively relieve the oxidative stress of piglets.According to Wu et al., an increase in the amount of amino acids that enter the portal vein can be useful in promoting tissue protein synthesis in animals [18]. Similar to other investigations with nutraceutical foods on pig diets [13], we found a higher serum amino acid concentration, mainly essential amino acids. In this sense, the leucine that increased with SCCWE supplementation together with isoleucine and valine intervened in the formation and repair of muscle tissue, helping to protect muscles and regulating blood sugar levels. It also acts as a good energy source and helps increase production of growth hormone, which is important in the intensive production of pigs [18]. Additionally, isoleucine, which increased at concentrations of SCCWE greater than 0.05% (Table 4), participates in the formation of hemoglobin and regulates and stabilizes blood sugar and energy levels. Furthermore, isoleucine helps in repairing muscle tissue, skin, and bones [8].Generally, the use of prebiotics, probiotics, and herbs in pig diets increases the concentration of arginine, leading to a better animal response [19], as is evident in our results (Table 4). Apparently, improved intestinal health could help to improve the content of this amino acid. Arginine is a vital amino acid in metabolism and participates in multiple pathways, including the synthesis of proteins, polyamines, NO, and creatine. Moreover, Tan et al. (2009) demonstrated that arginine reduces body fat mass and increases muscle gain by its effects on endothelial vasodilators. Similarly, this amino acid plays a role in T-lymphocyte proliferation in response to mitogens [20].Another amino acid that increased (P<0.05) with SCCWE supplementation on day 21 after initiation of the experiment was phenylalanine, which is an important precursor for the synthesis of acetoacetyl-CoA and tyrosine. In the intestine, phenylalanine acts as a competitive inhibitor in the regulation of amino acid absorption. Some interactions between phenylalanine and the anionic amino acids, aspartate and glutamate, are also observed during metabolic processes [21]. Phenylalanine oxidation is used to indicate the partition of absorbed amino acids between protein synthesis and oxidation.Intestinal morphological structure is affected by diet and intestinal health. The intestinal villus and crypt are correlated with gut health and growth in pigs [22]. Therefore, our results suggest a beneficial effect of SCCWE supplementation (from 0.10%) on growth performance and on the villus height of the jejunum and ileum. Similarly, Zhang et al. have reported a higher villus height in birds fed with yeast cell wall compared to a control treatment, but there was no significant change in crypt depth in the small intestine [23]. Apparently this product (SCCWE) did not affect the crypt depth, possibly because fiber contributions (Table 1) did not surpass the permissible limits for the category and animal species, and high fiber diets cause a reduction of feed intake with a lower crypt depth in pigs [24]. In pigs, there have been few studies noting the benefits of yeast cell walls on intestinal morphology.Although the composition or the activity of the microflora in the digestive tract was not determined in this study, other studies have indicated that SCCWE supplementation reduced the population ofE. coli [7] and increased lactic acid bacteria. Thus, the weight of the small intestine might be reduced by decreasing inflammation with better development of intestinal villi, in our case, in the jejunum and ileum (Table 5). However, other authors using dietary additives have found an increased villus height of the duodenum, despite the fact that it generally atrophies more seriously than the jejunum and ileum after weaning [25].These findings show a beneficial dietary effect ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall extract supplementation on growth performance, the serum concentration of some essential and nonessential amino acids, and intestinal morphology. Additionally, these results show that this product is safe and effective in reducing diarrhea, and it may be used as a substitute for antibiotics in weaned piglets.



---

*Source: 3967439-2017-03-12.xml*