# Nondestructive Measurement of Momentum Transfer Collision Frequency for Low Temperature Combustion Plasma

Authors: Douglas Letsholathebe; Kgakgamatso M. Mphale; Samuel Chimidza
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Accurately measured momentum transfer collision frequency and electron density for fire plasma enable correct simulation of electromagnetic wave propagation in the medium. The simulation is essential for designing high-performance systems suitable for the environment. Despite this, momentum transfer collision frequency for fire plumes has always been an estimated quantity and/or crudely determined. There are anecdotal reports of severe line-of-sight (LOS) radio frequency signal degradation on firegrounds. The problem has implications on safety of fire-fighters during wildfire suppression hence the need of high performance communication systems. In the experiment, a nonintrusive and direct method for measuring momentum transfer collision frequency in a fire plume was carried out. Using an automatic network analyser,x-band microwaves were caused to propagate combustion zones of eucalyptus and grass litter fires to measure the flames, scattering parameters. The parameters were then used to determine average collision frequencies for the plumes. The average collision frequencies for the eucalyptus and grass fire plumes were measured to be 5.84
×
10
10 and 5.92
×
10
10 rad/s, respectively.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Large high intensity wildfires are a recurring phenomenon in eucalyptus dominated forests of temperate south-eastern Australia and southern California shrublands [1, 2]. Antecedent climate under which the fires burn is often characterised by the occurrence of El-Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) related drought and persistent hot dry winds which sweep through the ecosystems making them fire prone [3]. When ignited under extreme fire weather, the dehydrated vegetation burns into large high intensity wildfires which are a threat to human lives and property at urban-wildland interfaces. At times, the wildfires result in tragic loss of human lives and properties worth millions of dollars, for example, Black Saturday fire incident (see [4]). Under such apprehensive situations, reliable radio communications systems which are capable of operating under severe atmospheric conditions are essential for distribution of information among fire-fighters. Despite this, there are anecdotal reports of failure to maintain LOS radio frequency communication through large wildfire plumes [5]. This is a safety concern for fire-fighters on the fireground.Accurate knowledge of radio wave propagation characteristics in a fire plume is essential for designing high-performance systems suitable for the environment [6]. Since the early 1970s, a significant amount of research on propagation measurements of radio waves in vegetation fire plumes has been done, for example, [5, 7–10]. However, carrying out such measurements is time consuming and expensive. Nevertheless, the propagation data and simulation schemes are needed for performance evaluation of the systems. Hitherto, very little research has been done on simulation modelling of radio wave propagation characteristics in fire, for example, [11, 12].A fire plume is weakly ionised atmospheric pressure low temperature combustion plasma which is highly collisional [5]. Collision frequency is a crucial electromagnetic constitutive parameter for radio frequency propagation in the medium [13]. In spite of this, accurate determination of the parameter is still a challenge. Several methods have been used to determine the momentum transfer collision frequency in flames. They include the use of (a) graphical methods, for example, [14]; (b) interferometry (attenuation and phase change measurements), for example, [13]; and (c) expressions derived from the kinetictheory, for example, [10, 15, 16]. The graphical method is error prone [14]. The kinetic theory based expressions often lead to conflicting values of momentum transfer collision frequency at any particular temperature and hence leading to order of magnitude errors in the prediction of signal attenuation.The objective of the experiment is to provide a quick, nonintrusive, and accurate method for determining momentum transfer collision frequency for fire plasma using an automatic network analyser. In the experiment, scattering parameters (S
21 and S
11) were measured using an automatic network analyser and uploaded into a computer for analysis. A MATLAB program was written to extract complex relative dielectric permittivity from the scattering parameters and momentum transfer collision frequency determined from the imaginary and real parts of the relative dielectric permittivity. The theory pertinent to the method is discussed in Section 2. Section 3 of the paper discusses some of the theoretical equations used for calculation momentum collision frequency. Results of the measured collision frequencies are discussed in Section 5.


## 2. Theoretical Considerations

### 2.1. Momentum Transfer Collision Frequency

Consider a homogeneous, nonmagnetised weakly ionised fire plume which is illuminated with a low intensity electric field,E
=
E
0
e
i
ω
t
-
γ
·
x, propagating in the x-direction. The Boltzmann equation for electrons in the plume is given as [17]
(1)
∂
f
∂
t
+
q
e
E
m
e
∂
f
∂
v
=
{
∂
f
∂
t
}
coll
.
The right-hand side of (1) represents change in the distribution function by elastic and inelastic collisional processes.Expanding the distribution function,f, into a Legendre polynomial of the variable c
o
s
θ and neglecting second and higher order terms, we then have
(2)
f
=
f
0
+
f
1
·
c
o
s
θ
+
⋯
,
where c
o
s
θ
=
v
/
v. The symmetric part of the expansion in (2), f
0, is a Maxwellian distribution function given by
(3)
f
0
=
N
e
{
m
e
2
π
k
B
T
f
}
3
/
2
exp
⁡
(
-
m
e
v
2
2
π
k
B
T
f
)
.
The asymmetric part, f
1, is deviation from f
0 due to an increase in electron velocity.On Substituting (2) into (1) and integrating over the entire phase space gives [18]
(4)
f
1
=
-
q
e
E
m
e
(
φ
+
i
ω
)
∂
f
0
∂
v
.
Current density due to the electrons in the plume (J) is given by [18] as
(5)
J
=
4
π
q
e
3
∫
0
∞
v
3
f
1
d
v
.
From Ohm’s Law, current density is related to electrical conductivity (σ) by the relation:
(6)
J
=
σ
E
.
Therefore, complex electrical conductivity can then be deduced from (4) to (6) to be in the form:
(7)
σ
=
4
π
3
m
e
q
e
2
∫
0
∞
d
d
v
{
v
3
φ
+
i
ω
}
f
0
d
v
.
Let δ
=
v
/
(
2
k
B
T
f
/
m
e
)
1
/
2 and substituting (3) into (7) gives
(8)
σ
=
8
N
e
q
e
2
3
m
e
π
1
/
2
{
∫
0
∞
1
φ
+
i
ω
δ
4
e
-
δ
2
d
δ
}
.
Noting that ∫
0
∞
δ
4
e
-
δ
2
d
δ
=
(
3
/
8
)
(
π
)
1
/
2 and assuming that φ is independent of particle velocity in fire plasma as in [19], then the expression for conductivity (see (8)) reduces to the Lorentz-Drude Conductivity Equation:
(9)
σ
=
σ
′
+
i
σ
′
′
=
N
q
e
2
m
e
(
φ
2
+
ω
2
)
[
φ
-
i
ω
]
.
The real and imaginary parts of conductivity are related to relative dielectric permittivity (ε
r) by the expression [17];
(10)
ε
r
=
ε
′
-
i
ε
′
′
=
{
1
+
σ
′
i
ω
ε
0
+
σ
′
′
ω
ε
0
}
.
On substituting the real and imaginary parts of conductivity from (9) into (10) and simplifying after rearranging (10) gives electron-neutral particle momentum transfer collision frequency for the fire plasma as
(11)
φ
=
ω
{
ε
′
′
1
-
ε
′
}
.
The real and imaginary parts of relative dielectric permittivity for the plasma can be measured using an automatic network analyser.


### 2.2. Scattering Parameters and Relative Permittivity

Propagation factor (P) is related to the relative dielectric permittivity (ε
r), reflection, and transmission scattering parameters (S
11 and S
21, resp.) by the following expression [10]:
(12)
P
=
exp
⁡
{
-
i
ω
c
(
ε
r
)
d
}
=
[
S
11
2
+
S
21
2
-
Γ
1
-
(
S
11
+
S
21
)
Γ
]
.
Reflection coefficient (Γ) is given by the expression, Γ
=
χ
±
χ
2
-
1 where χ
=
(
(
S
11
2
-
S
21
2
+
1
)
/
2
S
11
). The sign in the expression for (Γ) is chosen such that |
Γ
|
<
1.Following from (12), ε
r for nonmagnetised fire plasma can be determined from the following expression:
(13)
ε
r
=
ε
′
-
i
ε
′
′
=
λ
pr
{
i
2
π
d
[
log
⁡
e
⁡
(
1
P
)
]
}
2
.


## 2.1. Momentum Transfer Collision Frequency

Consider a homogeneous, nonmagnetised weakly ionised fire plume which is illuminated with a low intensity electric field,E
=
E
0
e
i
ω
t
-
γ
·
x, propagating in the x-direction. The Boltzmann equation for electrons in the plume is given as [17]
(1)
∂
f
∂
t
+
q
e
E
m
e
∂
f
∂
v
=
{
∂
f
∂
t
}
coll
.
The right-hand side of (1) represents change in the distribution function by elastic and inelastic collisional processes.Expanding the distribution function,f, into a Legendre polynomial of the variable c
o
s
θ and neglecting second and higher order terms, we then have
(2)
f
=
f
0
+
f
1
·
c
o
s
θ
+
⋯
,
where c
o
s
θ
=
v
/
v. The symmetric part of the expansion in (2), f
0, is a Maxwellian distribution function given by
(3)
f
0
=
N
e
{
m
e
2
π
k
B
T
f
}
3
/
2
exp
⁡
(
-
m
e
v
2
2
π
k
B
T
f
)
.
The asymmetric part, f
1, is deviation from f
0 due to an increase in electron velocity.On Substituting (2) into (1) and integrating over the entire phase space gives [18]
(4)
f
1
=
-
q
e
E
m
e
(
φ
+
i
ω
)
∂
f
0
∂
v
.
Current density due to the electrons in the plume (J) is given by [18] as
(5)
J
=
4
π
q
e
3
∫
0
∞
v
3
f
1
d
v
.
From Ohm’s Law, current density is related to electrical conductivity (σ) by the relation:
(6)
J
=
σ
E
.
Therefore, complex electrical conductivity can then be deduced from (4) to (6) to be in the form:
(7)
σ
=
4
π
3
m
e
q
e
2
∫
0
∞
d
d
v
{
v
3
φ
+
i
ω
}
f
0
d
v
.
Let δ
=
v
/
(
2
k
B
T
f
/
m
e
)
1
/
2 and substituting (3) into (7) gives
(8)
σ
=
8
N
e
q
e
2
3
m
e
π
1
/
2
{
∫
0
∞
1
φ
+
i
ω
δ
4
e
-
δ
2
d
δ
}
.
Noting that ∫
0
∞
δ
4
e
-
δ
2
d
δ
=
(
3
/
8
)
(
π
)
1
/
2 and assuming that φ is independent of particle velocity in fire plasma as in [19], then the expression for conductivity (see (8)) reduces to the Lorentz-Drude Conductivity Equation:
(9)
σ
=
σ
′
+
i
σ
′
′
=
N
q
e
2
m
e
(
φ
2
+
ω
2
)
[
φ
-
i
ω
]
.
The real and imaginary parts of conductivity are related to relative dielectric permittivity (ε
r) by the expression [17];
(10)
ε
r
=
ε
′
-
i
ε
′
′
=
{
1
+
σ
′
i
ω
ε
0
+
σ
′
′
ω
ε
0
}
.
On substituting the real and imaginary parts of conductivity from (9) into (10) and simplifying after rearranging (10) gives electron-neutral particle momentum transfer collision frequency for the fire plasma as
(11)
φ
=
ω
{
ε
′
′
1
-
ε
′
}
.
The real and imaginary parts of relative dielectric permittivity for the plasma can be measured using an automatic network analyser.


## 2.2. Scattering Parameters and Relative Permittivity

Propagation factor (P) is related to the relative dielectric permittivity (ε
r), reflection, and transmission scattering parameters (S
11 and S
21, resp.) by the following expression [10]:
(12)
P
=
exp
⁡
{
-
i
ω
c
(
ε
r
)
d
}
=
[
S
11
2
+
S
21
2
-
Γ
1
-
(
S
11
+
S
21
)
Γ
]
.
Reflection coefficient (Γ) is given by the expression, Γ
=
χ
±
χ
2
-
1 where χ
=
(
(
S
11
2
-
S
21
2
+
1
)
/
2
S
11
). The sign in the expression for (Γ) is chosen such that |
Γ
|
<
1.Following from (12), ε
r for nonmagnetised fire plasma can be determined from the following expression:
(13)
ε
r
=
ε
′
-
i
ε
′
′
=
λ
pr
{
i
2
π
d
[
log
⁡
e
⁡
(
1
P
)
]
}
2
.


## 3. Calculation of Collision Frequency

For atmospheric pressure plasma, collision frequency is a very important parameter as collisions between charged particles can degrade and shift incident electromagnetic wave by a few wavelengths [20]. The collision frequency is a function of background gas number density, velocity of electrons, and collision cross section of electrons with the background gas. If the background gas is a mixture of gases, then momentum transfer collision cross-section with electrons should be averaged. Thus the average collision cross section is given by the relation:
(14)
Q
av
=
∑
i
m
i
Q
i
.
Average collision frequency for a particular electron velocity is then calculated from the equation [21]:
(15)
φ
=
v
-
N
g
Q
av
,
where v
-
=
{
2
k
B
T
f
/
m
e
}
1
/
2 is thermal velocity of the electrons of the flame gas.Several authors have used similar relations for the calculation of the momentum transfer collision frequency in flames, for example, [10, 15]. Letsholathebe and Mphale [10] calculated the parameter from the relation:
(16)
φ
=
P
D
g
2
{
π
2
k
B
T
f
m
e
}
.
Uhm [22] calculates momentum transfer collision frequency in flame plasma using the equation:
(17)
φ
=
1.36
×
1
0
12
[
T
rf
T
f
]
T
e
,
where T
rf
=
300
K is the reference temperature and T
e is fire plasma temperature in eV.Chen and Liu [15] calculated dielectric permittivity of a flame plasma using the following expression for momentum transfer collision frequency:
(18)
φ
=
3.637
×
1
0
-
10
[
P
k
B
T
f
]
.
Except for (15) and (16), collision frequency relations discussed above have no dependence on neutral gas diameter or collision cross section. A comparison of momentum transfer collision frequency calculated from the expression, (16)–(18), shows a marked deviation from each other (see Table 1) and this has a significant implication on simulation modelling.Table 1
Momentum transfer collision frequency from relation in the literature.
Fire temperature (K)
Momentum transfer collision frequency equation:
Letsholathebe and Mphale, (2013) [10]: (×1010 rad s−1)
Uhm, (1999) [22]: (×1011 rad s−1)
Lu and Laroussi, (2008) [21]: (×1010 rad s−1)
800
6.64
1.38
7.49
1100
5.66
1.17
6.39


## 4. Experimental Setup

### 4.1. Hexagonal Combustion Chamber and Analyser System

The equipment used for measuring scattering (S)-parameters for the fire is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a hexagonal combustion chamber, Hewlett-Packard automatic network analyser (HP 8577C) with 8–12 GHz transmit-receive horns and a computer. The horns were connected to the analyser through a two-port S-parameter test set by coaxial cables to measure reflection and transmission scattering parameters (S
11 and S
21). High quality mode transition adapters were used to make the connections between coaxial cables and the horns.Figure 1
Automatic network analyser set up for scattering parameters measurement.The hexagonal combustion chamber of width 76 cm was used as fuel bed for Guinea grass (Panicum maximum) and poplar gum (Eucalyptus platyphylla) litter. It was constructed from wood and hexagonally shaped for versatility. The chamber allowed for different combustion base area cross sections, for example, rectangular and circular, to be set. An 8 cm-thick sheet of a good thermal insulating material known as Fiberfrax was lined on the inside of the chamber in order to protect the wooden casing from fire. The lining reduced the microwave propagation path length to 52 cm. In the experiment, the Fiberfrax sheet was lined to form a circular base cross section. Two holes of horn antennae dimensions were also cut out from the burner casing, directly opposite to each other. Wooden supports were provided to hold the horns firmly in position during the experiment. Aeration holes of 0.25 cm in diameter were drilled on each side of the chamber, except the ones with horn inlets, to allow air to enter and mix with fuel during combustion.The litter used in the experiment was collected and left to dry in the laboratory for two (2) weeks before burning so as to increase combustion efficiency. Same amount of grass and eucalyptus litter (specific gravity = 25.50 kg m−3) was used for uniformity.


### 4.2. Temperature Measurement

A thermocouple tree was wired with three Type K thermocouples as shown in Figure1. The thermocouples were made from a braided fiberglass insulated chromel-alumel (24-G/G) wire with a diameter of 50 μm. The wires were electrofused at one end to make perfect junction and then tested for continuity with a multimeter. They were further wrapped with Fiberfrax, leaving only a centimetre (1 cm) protruding from the tree arm for temperature measurement (see Figure 1). The wrapping was done to protect the insulation from being burnt by fire. The thermocouples were then connected to a PICO Tech TC-O8 data logger to read in temperature into a laptop throughout each experiment.


### 4.3.S-Parameter Measurement

The analyser was calibrated using Transmit-Reflect-Line (TRL) method described in Baum et al., [23]. It was set to sweep from 8.00 to 10.0 GHz, logging in 601 S-parameter data points. The S-parameters were then uploaded to the computer for analysis using a MATLAB program. The analyser took approximately 2 s to sample over one sweep, and then there was a latency of about 50 s before the next sweep could be initiated. Several sweeps and logging in of the S-parameters were carried out but those for which flames filled the entire propagation path (by visual inspection) were chosen for S-parameter analysis. Two such cases were ggs1 and les1 (see Figure 2), which were in the first 60 s of the litter combustion.Figure 2
Eucalyptus litter fires temperature during the experiment.


## 4.1. Hexagonal Combustion Chamber and Analyser System

The equipment used for measuring scattering (S)-parameters for the fire is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a hexagonal combustion chamber, Hewlett-Packard automatic network analyser (HP 8577C) with 8–12 GHz transmit-receive horns and a computer. The horns were connected to the analyser through a two-port S-parameter test set by coaxial cables to measure reflection and transmission scattering parameters (S
11 and S
21). High quality mode transition adapters were used to make the connections between coaxial cables and the horns.Figure 1
Automatic network analyser set up for scattering parameters measurement.The hexagonal combustion chamber of width 76 cm was used as fuel bed for Guinea grass (Panicum maximum) and poplar gum (Eucalyptus platyphylla) litter. It was constructed from wood and hexagonally shaped for versatility. The chamber allowed for different combustion base area cross sections, for example, rectangular and circular, to be set. An 8 cm-thick sheet of a good thermal insulating material known as Fiberfrax was lined on the inside of the chamber in order to protect the wooden casing from fire. The lining reduced the microwave propagation path length to 52 cm. In the experiment, the Fiberfrax sheet was lined to form a circular base cross section. Two holes of horn antennae dimensions were also cut out from the burner casing, directly opposite to each other. Wooden supports were provided to hold the horns firmly in position during the experiment. Aeration holes of 0.25 cm in diameter were drilled on each side of the chamber, except the ones with horn inlets, to allow air to enter and mix with fuel during combustion.The litter used in the experiment was collected and left to dry in the laboratory for two (2) weeks before burning so as to increase combustion efficiency. Same amount of grass and eucalyptus litter (specific gravity = 25.50 kg m−3) was used for uniformity.


## 4.2. Temperature Measurement

A thermocouple tree was wired with three Type K thermocouples as shown in Figure1. The thermocouples were made from a braided fiberglass insulated chromel-alumel (24-G/G) wire with a diameter of 50 μm. The wires were electrofused at one end to make perfect junction and then tested for continuity with a multimeter. They were further wrapped with Fiberfrax, leaving only a centimetre (1 cm) protruding from the tree arm for temperature measurement (see Figure 1). The wrapping was done to protect the insulation from being burnt by fire. The thermocouples were then connected to a PICO Tech TC-O8 data logger to read in temperature into a laptop throughout each experiment.


## 4.3.S-Parameter Measurement

The analyser was calibrated using Transmit-Reflect-Line (TRL) method described in Baum et al., [23]. It was set to sweep from 8.00 to 10.0 GHz, logging in 601 S-parameter data points. The S-parameters were then uploaded to the computer for analysis using a MATLAB program. The analyser took approximately 2 s to sample over one sweep, and then there was a latency of about 50 s before the next sweep could be initiated. Several sweeps and logging in of the S-parameters were carried out but those for which flames filled the entire propagation path (by visual inspection) were chosen for S-parameter analysis. Two such cases were ggs1 and les1 (see Figure 2), which were in the first 60 s of the litter combustion.Figure 2
Eucalyptus litter fires temperature during the experiment.


## 5. Results and Discussions

### 5.1. Flame Temperatures

The temperatures of the eucalyptus litter samples were logged into the data logger, until the fires got extinguished. It was observed that the samples burnt fiercely in the first 100 s since ignition and this was the period in which the fires filled the whole propagation path (52 cm). The poplar gum litter burnt faster (25 K/s) than the grass sample to reach a maximum temperature of 1030 K in 52 s (see Figure2). It then burnt at steady rate of 1.9 K/s for a period of 8 s with the flame filling the whole propagation path. After 80 s the temperature of the poplar gum sample fell to 796 K. The flame was observed to burn less fiercely after this time with temperature decreasing at the rate of 5 K/s until it got extinguished after 305 sec.Guinea grass litter burnt at about the same rate as that of the poplar gum even though the latter took slightly longer to flame. The combustion rate of the grass litter was 23 K/s and took 43 s to reach maximum combustion temperature of 908 K (Figure2). After 46 s the grass burnt steadily for 10 s to reach a temperature of 832 K. S-parameters sampling was done when combustion reached a steady rate and for the grass litter it was done after 55 s when fire temperature was 839 K.


### 5.2. Measured Collision Frequency

Using aMATLAB program, real and imaginary components of fire dielectric permittivity were extracted from the S-parameters. They were then used in (11) to determine momentum transfer collision frequency. The measured momentum transfer collision frequencies were averaged over the microwave frequency range (8.00 to 10.0 GHz) and the values were 5.92
×
10
10 and 5.84
×
10
10 rad s−1 for grass and eucalyptus litter fires, respectively (Figures 3 and 4). It is noteworthy that the temperature for the leaf fire les1 was the highest and the expectation is that its collision frequency should be smaller than that of the grass fire as it was determined from the experiment.Figure 3
Measured collision frequency for the grass fire.Figure 4
Measured collision frequency for eucalyptus fire.The momentum transfer collision frequency could also be estimated fromattenuation coefficient versus propagation frequency plots. The attenuation coefficients were calculated from S-parameters measured using the network analyser at the times ggs1 and les1. However, the method is less accurate than that which uses (11). The plots were observed to have broad absorption peaks near the collision frequencies (see [20]). The peaks for the graphs corresponded to collision frequencies, 5.95
×
10
10 and 5.78
×
10
10 rad s−1, for the grass and eucalyptus litter, respectively (see Figures 5 and 6). The values are not very much different from those obtained from (11).Figure 5
Grass fire absorption maxima and collision frequency.Figure 6
Eucalyptus litter fire absorption maxima and collision frequency.


## 5.1. Flame Temperatures

The temperatures of the eucalyptus litter samples were logged into the data logger, until the fires got extinguished. It was observed that the samples burnt fiercely in the first 100 s since ignition and this was the period in which the fires filled the whole propagation path (52 cm). The poplar gum litter burnt faster (25 K/s) than the grass sample to reach a maximum temperature of 1030 K in 52 s (see Figure2). It then burnt at steady rate of 1.9 K/s for a period of 8 s with the flame filling the whole propagation path. After 80 s the temperature of the poplar gum sample fell to 796 K. The flame was observed to burn less fiercely after this time with temperature decreasing at the rate of 5 K/s until it got extinguished after 305 sec.Guinea grass litter burnt at about the same rate as that of the poplar gum even though the latter took slightly longer to flame. The combustion rate of the grass litter was 23 K/s and took 43 s to reach maximum combustion temperature of 908 K (Figure2). After 46 s the grass burnt steadily for 10 s to reach a temperature of 832 K. S-parameters sampling was done when combustion reached a steady rate and for the grass litter it was done after 55 s when fire temperature was 839 K.


## 5.2. Measured Collision Frequency

Using aMATLAB program, real and imaginary components of fire dielectric permittivity were extracted from the S-parameters. They were then used in (11) to determine momentum transfer collision frequency. The measured momentum transfer collision frequencies were averaged over the microwave frequency range (8.00 to 10.0 GHz) and the values were 5.92
×
10
10 and 5.84
×
10
10 rad s−1 for grass and eucalyptus litter fires, respectively (Figures 3 and 4). It is noteworthy that the temperature for the leaf fire les1 was the highest and the expectation is that its collision frequency should be smaller than that of the grass fire as it was determined from the experiment.Figure 3
Measured collision frequency for the grass fire.Figure 4
Measured collision frequency for eucalyptus fire.The momentum transfer collision frequency could also be estimated fromattenuation coefficient versus propagation frequency plots. The attenuation coefficients were calculated from S-parameters measured using the network analyser at the times ggs1 and les1. However, the method is less accurate than that which uses (11). The plots were observed to have broad absorption peaks near the collision frequencies (see [20]). The peaks for the graphs corresponded to collision frequencies, 5.95
×
10
10 and 5.78
×
10
10 rad s−1, for the grass and eucalyptus litter, respectively (see Figures 5 and 6). The values are not very much different from those obtained from (11).Figure 5
Grass fire absorption maxima and collision frequency.Figure 6
Eucalyptus litter fire absorption maxima and collision frequency.


## 6. Conclusions

Transmission of the microwaves was through the hottest region of the fire with significant number of thermal ions (electrons). It also happens to be the region where significant signal amplitude loss by collision occurs. The method proposed was able to measure momentum transfer collision frequency with a fair amount of accuracy.At the temperature 1006 K, collision frequency of the eucalyptus leaf fire was measured to be5.84
×
10
10 rad s−1 and 5.78
×
10
10 rad s−1 by both the direct and graphical methods, respectively. At a much cooler temperature of 839 K, collision frequency for Guinea grass litter was determined to be 5.92
×
10
10 rad s−1 and 5.95
×
10
10 rad s−1 when using the methods, respectively. There was a noticeable average discrepancy of 0.05
×
10
10 rad s−1 between the methods. This could be accounted for by errors accrued when identifying the broad absorption peak by the mean value theorem. Compared to collision frequency obtained by calculation using kinetic theory derived expressions, the expression used by [10] gives collision frequencies which are close to the ones determined from S-parameters, thus 5.82
×
10
10 and 6.37
×
10
10 rad s−1 for the temperatures 1006 and 839 K, respectively. The other expression from [15, 22] gives values which were far from the measured, for example, 8.04
×
10
10 and 1.34
×
10
11 rad s−1, respectively.Momentum transfer collision of fire plumes depends on the concentration of both the electrons and background gas. For very hot seed flames, it was observed that collision frequencies are much higher, for example,2.6
×
10
11 in Schneider and Hofmann’s study [24]. The same is also observed in Belcher and Sugden’s study [25], where collision frequency for hydrocarbon gas flame was calculated to be 8.8
×
10
10 rad s−1. This alkali seeding increased electron densities in both flames hence in high collision frequencies measured.



---

*Source: 384701-2014-02-18.xml*