# Synthesis of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles: Chemical and Green Synthesis Method and Its Toxicity Evaluation against Pathogenic Bacteria Using the ToxTrak Test

Authors: Pankaj Kumar Tyagi; Cristina Quispe; Jesús Herrera-Bravo; Shruti Tyagi; D. Barbhai Mrunal; Manoj Kumar; Anas S. Dablool; Saad Alghamdi; Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Javad Sharifi-Rad; Seema Ramniwas
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

In the current investigation, silver/gold nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized using two methods: chemical and biological, and then characterized colloidal solutions of both NPs using UV-Vis, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and zeta potential analyzers, X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) as well as the ToxTrak test forin vitro toxicity and antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria (B. subtilis) and Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli). The plasmon peak of chemical synthesized silver NPs (CH-AgNPs) and gold NPs (CH-AuNPs) was observed at 414 and 530 nm, respectively, while the sharp plasmon peak of biological synthesized silver NPs (Bio-AgNPs) and gold NPs (Bio-AuNPs) was observed at 410 and 525 nm. Under transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the average sizes of CH-AgNPs and CH-AuNPs were 50.56 and 25.98 nm, respectively. Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs, on the other hand, had average sizes of 25.25 and 16.65 nm, respectively. The stability of NPs was also investigated using the zeta potential. The crystalline structure of AgNPs was confirmed through XRD, and EDX results confirm the element compositions. In the ToxTrak test, the toxic effect value/percentage inhibition (TEV/PI) was calculated. The results showed that CH-AgNPs have the highest TEV/PI value (85.45% for B. subtilis and 83.77% for E. coli) when compared to Bio-AgNPs (55.75% for B. subtilis and 54.42% for E. coli). CH-AuNPs, on the other hand, were 33.51% toxic to B. subtilis and 36.85% toxic to E. coli, compared to Bio-AuNPs, which were 23.36% toxic to B. subtilis and 24.46% toxic to E. coli. The antibacterial activity of Ag/Au NPs was tested and monitored; zone of inhibition (mm in diameter) against B. subtilis and E. coli, with the following pattern emerging: CH-AgNPs (24.80) had the highest antibacterial activity followed by Bio-AgNPs (22.80) < CH-AuNPs (10.60) < Bio-AuNPs (09.00), whereas the control sample (tetracycline antibiotic) revealed a 25.08 mm, zone of inhabitation. Overall, Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs are the most effective pathogen-killing materials with the lowest toxicity. Our suggestion is that such materials instead of chemical synthesized NPs can be used to coat antibiotic drugs and could be a game-changer for the pharmaceutical industry in terms of effectively controlling the pathogenic bacteria.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Silver, gold, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles have long been used for its antibacterial properties. The famous historian Herodotus first wrote about the use of silver to keep water fresh in the 5th century BC, and Hippocrates was using silver for treating wounds and ulcers [1]. The prevalence of silver nanoparticles has increased significantly, but it is still unclear what antimicrobial properties with toxicity estimation make it attractive and attentive. Nowadays, biological substances such as plants, bacteria, yeast, actinomycetes, and viruses are commonly employed in the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles [2–4]. Nanosilver has been widely used to paints, dye degradation and clothing [5–8], children toys, cosmetics and medicinal products [2, 9], food storage and handling containers [10], bacterial contaminations [11–13], and other applications [14]. The interest in nanomaterial stems from their nanoscale properties that differ from their properties in bulk. For example, bulk gold has an unmistakable yellow hue. Gold nanoparticles, on the other hand, change in colour depending on their size; small NPs are red, medium NPs are purple, and giant NPs are blue, and the differences are not purely visual. In contrast to their bulk counterparts, the gold NPs are good catalysts, have a decreased melting temperature, are reactive in nature with magnetic properties, and change from metal to a semiconductor [15]. Toxicity is also impacted by size [16]. A harmless material in bulk can become toxic at the nanoscale. Another aspect of nanomaterial toxicity is their sensitivity to synthesis method, seemingly minor changes, batch-to-batch, can have drastic impacts of the resulting NP. These changes include size and shape changes, coatings, and charges [17, 18]. In an in vitro comparative study of silicon dioxide (SiO2) and TiO2, SiO2 NPs exhibited significant proinflammatory activity for human monocyte, while TiO2 had less activity [19]. Some studies were conducted in rat liver cells to assess nanosilver as an in vitro toxicity assay, and the results showed that low levels of silver NP exposure resulted in oxidative stress and impaired mitochondrial function [20]. Nowadays, green synthesis of NPs by using plant extracts is popularizing due to more safety features. The phenolic compounds and other secondary metabolites present in the plant extracts improve the specific bioactivity (for example, improvement in antimicrobial activity) of synthesized NPs. Gram’s positive and negative aspects B. subtilis and E. coli, both facultative anaerobic and rod-shaped bacteria, are commonly found in the human lower intestine and account for 0.1% of gut flora [13, 21]. These gut microbes known as probiotics and enhance immunity of the body and allowing the organism to tolerate extreme environmental conditions. The authors of the current study employed chemical and biological methods to synthesis silver and gold nanoparticles, which were then tested for toxicity and antibacterial activity against pathogenic bacteria including B. subtilis and E. coli.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Sample Preparation

Tetrachloroauric acid, silver nitrate, trisodium citrates, nutrient agar, and resazurin dye of AR grade were used and obtained from Sigma and Merck for chemical synthesis of Ag/Au NPs. Fresh plant leaves ofHibiscus Rosa sinensis (gurhal) were collected from the Institute campus for biological synthesis of Ag/Au NPs. For the study of toxicity and antibacterial activities, B. subtilis (Gram-positive) and E. coli (Gram-negative) cultures were collected from the microbiology laboratory of this Institute.


### 2.2. Extraction Preparation

To obtain the extract, the plant leaves were thoroughly washed three times with double distilled water and 10 g leaves were ground. The 10 mL extract was combined with 90 mL deionized water and boiled for 15 minutes at 90°C. The extracts were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 10000 rpm.


### 2.3. Chemical Synthesis of Silver/Gold Nanoparticles

38 mM trisodium citrate dehydrate (Na3C6H5O7·2H2O) and 0.75 mM silver nitrate used for synthesis CH-AgNPs. 50 mL AgNO3 mixed with 10 mL trisodium citrate into dropwise method and heated up to 90°C and CH-AgNPs obtained with chemical degradation and gradually by the erosion and the transparent light color turned to brownish black indicating the presence of AgNPs. On the other hand, the chemical synthesis of AuNPs, the 1% trisodium citrate dehydrate solution, and 1.0 mM HAuCl4 were used for CH-AuNPs. Continuous rolling boiled with magnetic stir bar 20 mL of chloroauric acid mixed with 1% trisodium citrate dihydrate solution of 2 mL. In this process, trisodium citrate reduces the gold solution and solution turned light reddish violet in color. The light reddish violet color indicates the formation of AuNPs.


### 2.4. Biological Synthesis of Silver/Gold Nanoparticles

95 mL plant leaf extract (supernatant) in conical flasks and added 5 mL of 0.75 mM AgNO3 aqueous solution as a precursor for obtaining Bio-AgNPs. This solution was incubated in incubator shaking at 30°C of 150 rpm up to 72 h. Under incubation time, the extract of this solution act as a reducing and stabilizing agent and silver ions may be changes into colloidal silver solution. During this process the changes in color pale yellow to blackish brown indicates the synthesis of Bio-AgNPs. The same process applied for synthesis of gold NPs. 95 mL plant leaf extract (supernatant) in conical flasks and added 5 mL of an aqueous solution of tetrachloroauric acid solution as a precursor for obtaining Bio-AuNPs. The 100 mL solution was incubated in incubator shaking of 150 rpm at 30°C for 72 h. In this process, change in color pale yellow to purple reddish indicates the synthesis of Bio-AuNPs.


### 2.5. Characterization Techniques of Ag/AuNPs

The CH-Ag/AuNPs and Bio-Ag/AuNPs in the form of colloidal solutions were primary characterized with visible spectrophotometry, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), XRD, and zeta potential analyzers were also carried out. TEM was used to examine the size and morphology of the NPs. An accelerating voltage of 200 kV was used in the microscope. After diluting the silver samples (1 : 10) in distilled water, an aliquot (20 L) was applied to a carbon-coated grid. The solution was then left for 1 minute before being blotted with filter paper to remove any excess from the grid. Before imaging, the grids were placed in the grid box for two hours to dry. The zeta potential is a physical property determined by the net surface charge of NPs. A Coulomb explosion occurs between the charges of these particles when they repel each other in a solution, resulting in no tendency for the particles to agglomerate. When the zeta potential values ranged from higher than +30 mV to lower than -30 mV, the criteria for NP stability were measured [22]. The laser zeta meter was used to measure surface zeta potentials, and using NaCl as a suspending electrolyte solution, liquid samples of NPs (5 mL) were diluted with double distilled water (50 mL) (2×10−2 M NaCl). After that, the pH was adjusted to the desired level. For 30 minutes, the samples were shaken. The zeta potential of the metallic particles was measured, and the equilibrium pH was recorded after shaking. The surface potential of NPs was determined using a zeta potential. An average of three separate measurements was reported in each case. When the zeta potential values ranged from higher than +30 mV to lower than -30 mV, the criteria for NPs stability were measured [23]. The crystalline structure of AgNPs was confirmed through XRD analysis and EDX results confirm the element compositions.


### 2.6. Toxicity of Metal Nanoparticles through ToxTrak Test

Toxicity of CH-Ag/AuNPs and Bio-Ag/AuNPs was assessed using the ToxTrak test, and the toxic effect value/percentage inhibition (TEV/PI) was calculated after a minor modification to the previously published protocol [24]. 10 culture tubes of broth for 48 hours, each containing 25 g/mL solutions of B. subtilis and E. coli cultures, divided into two groups: k1 for B. subtilis and k2 for E. coli. The first test tube of the k1 group was designated as a control sample for determining the toxicity of Ag/Au NPs against B. subtilis. The second and third culture tubes were labelled as chemically synthesized NPs, and 1 mL of CH-AgNPs and CH-AuNPs were added to each culture tube. The Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs were added to the 4th and 5th culture tubes, which were labelled as biologically synthesized NPs. The 6th culture tube of the k2 group was designated as a control sample for determining the toxicity of Ag/Au NPs against E. coli. Chemically synthesized NPs were added to the 7th and 8th culture tubes, respectively, with 1 mL of CH-AgNPs and CH-AuNPs. The ninth and tenth culture tubes were labelled as biologically synthesized NPs, and 1 mL of Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs, respectively, was added to them. In both groups (k1 and k2), 40 μL resazurin dye was added to each culture tube, and the tubes were incubated for 0 to 4 h [25]. The absorption was measured in all culture tubes of the k1 and k2 groups immediately after adding the dye, from 0 to 4 h after 1 h intervals.


#### 2.6.1.In Vitro Toxic Effect Value (TEV) Evaluation

The ToxTrak test was used to assess the toxicity of chemical and biologically synthesized Ag/AuNPs [24, 26]. At 603 nm wavelength, we calculated the percentage inhibition (PI/TEV) of B. subtilis (k1) and E. coli (k2) in this test [13, 24]. The final result of the PI reaction is known as the toxic effect value (TEV), and the PI is written as follows:
(1)PI=–ΔAsampleΔAcontrol×100,where ΔA=Initialabsorbancevalue−finalabsorbancevalueinthisequation.The differences (decrease) in absorbance for the control samples and chemical and biologically synthesized Ag and AuNPs were used to calculate the PI/TEV value in percentage [27].


#### 2.6.2. Methods for Calculating Absorbance Differences (Decreases)

(i)
ΔAcontrol is used to present the control sample, and the control value is -2.7151 (k1) and -2.6915 (k2)(ii)
CH-AgNPs resembling withΔACH−AgNPS and absorbance values of -0.3952 (k1) and -0.4368 (k2)(iii)
CH-AuNPs interacting withΔACH−AuNPS and absorbance values of -1.8072 (k1) and -1.3396 (k2)(iv)
Bio-AgNPs resembling withΔABio−AgNPs and absorbance values of -1.2026 (k1) and -1.2269 (k2)(v)
Bio-AuNPs representing withΔABio−AuNPs and absorbance values of -2.0829 (k1) and -2.0330 (k2)


### 2.7. Antibacterial Potential of Ag/AuNPs

The antibacterial potential of CH-Ag/AuNPs and Bio-Ag/AuNPS was determined using the standard disc diffusion method againstB. subtilis and E. coli [28]. The bacterial pathogens were taken from the microbiology lab of this Institute and kept on nutrient agar media. The colloidal solution of Ag/AuNPs synthesized by chemical and biological methods was prepared prior to use by dissolving Ag/AuNPs in 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 1000 g/mL) and sonicating the samples at 30°C for 15 minutes. The assay was performed using filter paper discs containing 50 g of Ag/AuNPs per disc. Tetracycline, a common antibiotic, was used as a positive control at 5 g/disk, while 5% DMSO was used as a negative control. For the assay, overnight grown cultures of tested bacteria were diluted to 1×10−7 colony-forming unit. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C, the diameter of zones of inhibition was measured to determine the antibacterial activity of the Ag/AuNPs.


### 2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data in this paper was analyzed using Statistica, release 7.0 StatSoft an advanced analytics software system.


## 2.1. Sample Preparation

Tetrachloroauric acid, silver nitrate, trisodium citrates, nutrient agar, and resazurin dye of AR grade were used and obtained from Sigma and Merck for chemical synthesis of Ag/Au NPs. Fresh plant leaves ofHibiscus Rosa sinensis (gurhal) were collected from the Institute campus for biological synthesis of Ag/Au NPs. For the study of toxicity and antibacterial activities, B. subtilis (Gram-positive) and E. coli (Gram-negative) cultures were collected from the microbiology laboratory of this Institute.


## 2.2. Extraction Preparation

To obtain the extract, the plant leaves were thoroughly washed three times with double distilled water and 10 g leaves were ground. The 10 mL extract was combined with 90 mL deionized water and boiled for 15 minutes at 90°C. The extracts were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 10000 rpm.


## 2.3. Chemical Synthesis of Silver/Gold Nanoparticles

38 mM trisodium citrate dehydrate (Na3C6H5O7·2H2O) and 0.75 mM silver nitrate used for synthesis CH-AgNPs. 50 mL AgNO3 mixed with 10 mL trisodium citrate into dropwise method and heated up to 90°C and CH-AgNPs obtained with chemical degradation and gradually by the erosion and the transparent light color turned to brownish black indicating the presence of AgNPs. On the other hand, the chemical synthesis of AuNPs, the 1% trisodium citrate dehydrate solution, and 1.0 mM HAuCl4 were used for CH-AuNPs. Continuous rolling boiled with magnetic stir bar 20 mL of chloroauric acid mixed with 1% trisodium citrate dihydrate solution of 2 mL. In this process, trisodium citrate reduces the gold solution and solution turned light reddish violet in color. The light reddish violet color indicates the formation of AuNPs.


## 2.4. Biological Synthesis of Silver/Gold Nanoparticles

95 mL plant leaf extract (supernatant) in conical flasks and added 5 mL of 0.75 mM AgNO3 aqueous solution as a precursor for obtaining Bio-AgNPs. This solution was incubated in incubator shaking at 30°C of 150 rpm up to 72 h. Under incubation time, the extract of this solution act as a reducing and stabilizing agent and silver ions may be changes into colloidal silver solution. During this process the changes in color pale yellow to blackish brown indicates the synthesis of Bio-AgNPs. The same process applied for synthesis of gold NPs. 95 mL plant leaf extract (supernatant) in conical flasks and added 5 mL of an aqueous solution of tetrachloroauric acid solution as a precursor for obtaining Bio-AuNPs. The 100 mL solution was incubated in incubator shaking of 150 rpm at 30°C for 72 h. In this process, change in color pale yellow to purple reddish indicates the synthesis of Bio-AuNPs.


## 2.5. Characterization Techniques of Ag/AuNPs

The CH-Ag/AuNPs and Bio-Ag/AuNPs in the form of colloidal solutions were primary characterized with visible spectrophotometry, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), XRD, and zeta potential analyzers were also carried out. TEM was used to examine the size and morphology of the NPs. An accelerating voltage of 200 kV was used in the microscope. After diluting the silver samples (1 : 10) in distilled water, an aliquot (20 L) was applied to a carbon-coated grid. The solution was then left for 1 minute before being blotted with filter paper to remove any excess from the grid. Before imaging, the grids were placed in the grid box for two hours to dry. The zeta potential is a physical property determined by the net surface charge of NPs. A Coulomb explosion occurs between the charges of these particles when they repel each other in a solution, resulting in no tendency for the particles to agglomerate. When the zeta potential values ranged from higher than +30 mV to lower than -30 mV, the criteria for NP stability were measured [22]. The laser zeta meter was used to measure surface zeta potentials, and using NaCl as a suspending electrolyte solution, liquid samples of NPs (5 mL) were diluted with double distilled water (50 mL) (2×10−2 M NaCl). After that, the pH was adjusted to the desired level. For 30 minutes, the samples were shaken. The zeta potential of the metallic particles was measured, and the equilibrium pH was recorded after shaking. The surface potential of NPs was determined using a zeta potential. An average of three separate measurements was reported in each case. When the zeta potential values ranged from higher than +30 mV to lower than -30 mV, the criteria for NPs stability were measured [23]. The crystalline structure of AgNPs was confirmed through XRD analysis and EDX results confirm the element compositions.


## 2.6. Toxicity of Metal Nanoparticles through ToxTrak Test

Toxicity of CH-Ag/AuNPs and Bio-Ag/AuNPs was assessed using the ToxTrak test, and the toxic effect value/percentage inhibition (TEV/PI) was calculated after a minor modification to the previously published protocol [24]. 10 culture tubes of broth for 48 hours, each containing 25 g/mL solutions of B. subtilis and E. coli cultures, divided into two groups: k1 for B. subtilis and k2 for E. coli. The first test tube of the k1 group was designated as a control sample for determining the toxicity of Ag/Au NPs against B. subtilis. The second and third culture tubes were labelled as chemically synthesized NPs, and 1 mL of CH-AgNPs and CH-AuNPs were added to each culture tube. The Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs were added to the 4th and 5th culture tubes, which were labelled as biologically synthesized NPs. The 6th culture tube of the k2 group was designated as a control sample for determining the toxicity of Ag/Au NPs against E. coli. Chemically synthesized NPs were added to the 7th and 8th culture tubes, respectively, with 1 mL of CH-AgNPs and CH-AuNPs. The ninth and tenth culture tubes were labelled as biologically synthesized NPs, and 1 mL of Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs, respectively, was added to them. In both groups (k1 and k2), 40 μL resazurin dye was added to each culture tube, and the tubes were incubated for 0 to 4 h [25]. The absorption was measured in all culture tubes of the k1 and k2 groups immediately after adding the dye, from 0 to 4 h after 1 h intervals.


### 2.6.1.In Vitro Toxic Effect Value (TEV) Evaluation

The ToxTrak test was used to assess the toxicity of chemical and biologically synthesized Ag/AuNPs [24, 26]. At 603 nm wavelength, we calculated the percentage inhibition (PI/TEV) of B. subtilis (k1) and E. coli (k2) in this test [13, 24]. The final result of the PI reaction is known as the toxic effect value (TEV), and the PI is written as follows:
(1)PI=–ΔAsampleΔAcontrol×100,where ΔA=Initialabsorbancevalue−finalabsorbancevalueinthisequation.The differences (decrease) in absorbance for the control samples and chemical and biologically synthesized Ag and AuNPs were used to calculate the PI/TEV value in percentage [27].


### 2.6.2. Methods for Calculating Absorbance Differences (Decreases)

(i)
ΔAcontrol is used to present the control sample, and the control value is -2.7151 (k1) and -2.6915 (k2)(ii)
CH-AgNPs resembling withΔACH−AgNPS and absorbance values of -0.3952 (k1) and -0.4368 (k2)(iii)
CH-AuNPs interacting withΔACH−AuNPS and absorbance values of -1.8072 (k1) and -1.3396 (k2)(iv)
Bio-AgNPs resembling withΔABio−AgNPs and absorbance values of -1.2026 (k1) and -1.2269 (k2)(v)
Bio-AuNPs representing withΔABio−AuNPs and absorbance values of -2.0829 (k1) and -2.0330 (k2)


## 2.6.1.In Vitro Toxic Effect Value (TEV) Evaluation

The ToxTrak test was used to assess the toxicity of chemical and biologically synthesized Ag/AuNPs [24, 26]. At 603 nm wavelength, we calculated the percentage inhibition (PI/TEV) of B. subtilis (k1) and E. coli (k2) in this test [13, 24]. The final result of the PI reaction is known as the toxic effect value (TEV), and the PI is written as follows:
(1)PI=–ΔAsampleΔAcontrol×100,where ΔA=Initialabsorbancevalue−finalabsorbancevalueinthisequation.The differences (decrease) in absorbance for the control samples and chemical and biologically synthesized Ag and AuNPs were used to calculate the PI/TEV value in percentage [27].


## 2.6.2. Methods for Calculating Absorbance Differences (Decreases)

(i)
ΔAcontrol is used to present the control sample, and the control value is -2.7151 (k1) and -2.6915 (k2)(ii)
CH-AgNPs resembling withΔACH−AgNPS and absorbance values of -0.3952 (k1) and -0.4368 (k2)(iii)
CH-AuNPs interacting withΔACH−AuNPS and absorbance values of -1.8072 (k1) and -1.3396 (k2)(iv)
Bio-AgNPs resembling withΔABio−AgNPs and absorbance values of -1.2026 (k1) and -1.2269 (k2)(v)
Bio-AuNPs representing withΔABio−AuNPs and absorbance values of -2.0829 (k1) and -2.0330 (k2)


## 2.7. Antibacterial Potential of Ag/AuNPs

The antibacterial potential of CH-Ag/AuNPs and Bio-Ag/AuNPS was determined using the standard disc diffusion method againstB. subtilis and E. coli [28]. The bacterial pathogens were taken from the microbiology lab of this Institute and kept on nutrient agar media. The colloidal solution of Ag/AuNPs synthesized by chemical and biological methods was prepared prior to use by dissolving Ag/AuNPs in 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 1000 g/mL) and sonicating the samples at 30°C for 15 minutes. The assay was performed using filter paper discs containing 50 g of Ag/AuNPs per disc. Tetracycline, a common antibiotic, was used as a positive control at 5 g/disk, while 5% DMSO was used as a negative control. For the assay, overnight grown cultures of tested bacteria were diluted to 1×10−7 colony-forming unit. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C, the diameter of zones of inhibition was measured to determine the antibacterial activity of the Ag/AuNPs.


## 2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data in this paper was analyzed using Statistica, release 7.0 StatSoft an advanced analytics software system.


## 3. Results

Silver/gold nanoparticles (NPs) were generated employing two ways in this study: chemical and biological. The chemical process of Ag/AuNPs can begin with AgNO3 and Aucl4, respectively, and be followed by the use of trisodium citrate dehydrate as a capping and chelating agent, which plays a critical role in chemical degradation and the production of Ag and Au ions. On the other hand, the presence of phytochemicals in the plant extract as capping agents initiates the biological process (green synthesis) of Ag/AuNPs, the leaf extract also plays a significant role as a reducing agent after being exposed to only the precursors of AgNO3 and Aucl4 without using any intermediate chemicals. After being exposed to AgNO3 and Aucl4 with the trisodium citrate dehydrate, the amount of Ag and Au ions obtained with chemical degradation and gradually by the erosion the transparent color turned to brownish black, indicating the presence of CH-AgNPs (Figure 1(b)), and light reddish violet color in CH-AuNPs (Figure 2(b)). In the biological method of Ag/AuNPs, the amount of Ag and Au ions in the leaf extract is reduced via phytochemicals present in the plant extract after being exposed to precursor AgNO3 and Aucl4 and the pale-yellow color of plant extract changed to blackish brown, indicating the Bio-AgNPs (Figure 3(b)) and purple reddish color in Bio-AuNPs (Figure 4(b)), respectively. The surface plasmon resonance phenomenon in Ag/AuNPs NPs [29, 30] as a result of the excitation of free electrons in NPs (K. [31]) causes this color change. Similar results have been reported in previous studies [32–36], indicating that the reaction between extracts and AgNO3 is complete. After 24 h, there were no more color changes, indicating that the reduction process was complete. This is consistent with previous research [37], which showed that Hibiscus Rosa sinensis leaf extract was used to synthesize Ag/Au NPs in just 24 h. In aqueous medium, surface plasmon vibrations cause AgNPs to appear yellowish brown [38]. Similar color shifts have been observed in previous studies [34, 39].Figure 1
(a) UV-Vis absorption spectrum (A) of CH-AgNPs produced by AgNO3 solution reduction. (b) Beakers showing chemical degradation and erosion, with the transparent light color gradually turning brownish black (B), indicating the presence of silver nanoparticles.Figure 2
(a) UV-Vis absorption spectrum of CH-AuNPs by reduction of HAuCl 4 solution (A). (b) Vials showing that the gold solution is reduced by trisodium citrate and the solution turn light reddish violet in colour (B), indicating the formation of Au nanoparticles.Figure 3
(a) UV-Vis absorption spectrum of Bio-AgNPs with the aqueous extract ofHibiscus Rosa sinensis (gurhal). (b) Vials showing colour changes (B), from pale yellow to blackish brown, indicating Bio-AgNP synthesis.Figure 4
(a) UV-Vis absorption spectrum of Bio-AuNPs with the aqueous extract ofHibiscus Rosa sinensis (gurhal). (b) Vials with colour changes ((B) pale yellow to purple reddish) indicate Bio-AuNP synthesis.


### 3.1. UV–Vis Spectroscopy

In the UV-Vis spectra of CH-AgNPs and CH-AuNPs, the plasmon peak was found at 414 nm with absorption of 0.77 and 530 nm with absorption of 1.20, respectively (Figures1(a) and2(a)). The surface plasmon peak in Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs was observed at 410 nm with absorption of 3.52 and at 525 nm with an absorption of 0.98, respectively (Figures 3(a) and 4(a)). In CH-AgNP, the broadening of the peak indicated that the particles are polydispersed. The formation of polydispersed large NPs due to slow reduction rates was indicated by broadening of the peak [40–44].


### 3.2. TEM Analysis of Nanoparticles

The morphology, particle shape, size, and distribution profile of Ag/AuNPs was revealed by TEM images. Figure5(a) depicts CH-AgNPs in cuboidal, hexagonal, and spherical shapes, with spherical shapes being the most common and average sizes of 50.56 nm at 100 nm scale and 200 kV accelerating voltage analysis. CH-AuNPs, on the other hand, had an average size of 25.98 nm at 100 nm scale with 200 kV accelerating voltage analysis and appeared to have a spherical morphology (Figure 5(b)). When sodium citrate was used as the reducing agent, spherical and ellipsoidal AgNPs with sizes ranging from 20 to 60 nm were obtained [45]. On the other hand, Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs with cubic, hexagonal, and spherical shapes with average sizes of 25.25 and 16.65 nm were obtained, respectively (Figure 6(a) and 6(b)). Biological synthesized AuNPs with size ranges of 15 to 55 nm with pseudospherical, triangular, and hexagonal [46–50]. All observed NPs are uniformly distributed in various sizes without significant agglomeration.Figure 5
TEM monograph of chemical synthesized nanoparticles (a) CH-AgNPs and (b) CH-AuNPs.
(a)(b)Figure 6
TEM monograph of biological synthesized nanoparticles: (a) Bio-AgNPs and (B) Bio-AuNPs.
(a)(b)


### 3.3. Zeta Potential Analysis

Surface zeta potentials were measured using a zeta analyzer in order to study the stability of NPs, which is critical for many applications. The pH of liquid NP samples (5 mL) was adjusted to the required value by diluting them with double distilled water (50 mL). For 30 minutes, the samples were shaken. The zeta potential of the metallic particles was measured after shaking. The surface potential of NPs was determined using a zeta potential. The CH-AgNPs and CH-AuNPs solutions had zeta potentials of -29.18 mV and -18.30 mV, respectively, with a single peak indicating the presence of repulsion among the synthesized NPs (Figures7(a) and 7(b)). Meanwhile, the zeta potential of the Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs solutions was -23.19 mV and -23.90 mV, respectively (Figures 8(a) and 8(b)). When all of the particles in a suspension have a large negative or positive zeta potential, they repel one another and have no tendency to clump together. There will be no force to keep the particles from colliding and flocculating if their zeta potential values are low (S. [51]). The zeta potential of chemical and biosynthesized Ag/AuNPs was found to be negative, indicating that they repel each other and increasing the formulation’s stability.Figure 7
Zeta potential distribution pattern: (a) CH-AgNPs (-29.18 mV) and (b) CH-AuNPs (-18.30 mV).
(a)(b)Figure 8
Zeta potential distribution pattern: (a) Bio-AgNPs (-23.19 mV) and (b) Bio-AuNPs (-23.90 mV).
(a)(b)


### 3.4. XRD Analysis

The powder XRD of silver nanoparticles reveals their crystalline nature. The crystalline structure of silver nanoparticles in powder form was investigated using XRD, and the results are consistent with previous research that revealed plausible silver metal peaks in Figure9(a) [52–54]. At 40°, 49°, 66°, 77°, and 83°, AgNPs display Bragg diffraction 2θ peaks, which correspond to 111, 200, 220, 311, and 222, respectively.Figure 9
XRD spectrum of synthesized AgNPs (a). EDX spectrum of synthesized AgNPs (b).
(a)(b)


### 3.5. EDX Analysis

The elemental composition of AgNPs was shown in Figure9(b). EDX investigation of silver nanoparticles at 3 keV detects the presence (10.01%), P (0.65%), S (0.45%), and Cl (0.46%). The studied sample also included the highest peak of C (88.43%). The Ag elemental peaks were identified at 1.00 and 3.00 keV.


### 3.6. Antibacterial Activity

Antibacterial activity was measured in zone of inhibition (mm in diameter), and the CH-AgNPs had high antibacterial activity of24.80±1.50 and 23.98±0.89, whereas the CH-AuNPs had moderate antibacterial activity of 10.60±0.82 and 12.80±0.90 against B. subtilis (Figure 10(a)) and E. coli (Figure 10(b)), respectively. Bio-AgNPs, on the other hand, had also excellent antibacterial activity 22.80±1.80 and 23.40±1.20, whereas Bio-AuNPs had poor antibacterial activity 09.60±1.91 and 10.70±1.22 against B. subtilis (Figure 10(a)) and E. coli (Figure 10(b)), respectively. Similar results were also reported for photosynthesized silver and gold NPs [42, 49, 55–57]. Tetracycline, a positive control and standard antibiotics, at 5 μg/disk, has good inhibitory activity 18.45±1.67 and 18.09±0.50 against B. subtilis and E. coli pathogens (Table 1). Our findings suggest that Bio-Ag/Au NPs have good antibacterial activity with low toxicity and could be a good antibiotic replacement. Despite the fact that NPs are widely used as antimicrobials, their mechanism is still unknown. Interference with cell wall synthesis, inhibition of protein synthesis, interference with nucleic acid synthesis, and inhibition of a metabolic pathway are all possible antimicrobial mechanisms [58, 59]. Nanomaterials can increase cell membrane permeability, interfere with DNA replication, denature bacterial proteins, and release silver ions within the bacterial cell [60].Figure 10
A comparison of antibacterial potential between zone of inhibition (mm) and no. of replicates of CH-Ag/AuNPs, Bio-Ag/AuNPs, and a standard control tetracycline antibiotic against (a)B. subtilis and (b) E. coli.
(a)(b)Table 1
Antibacterial activity of CH-Ag/AuNPs and Bio-Ag/AuNPs againstB. subtilis and E. coli.
S.no.Name of the organismZone of inhibition (mm in diameter)CH-AgNPsCH-AuNPsBio-AgNPsBio-AuNPsHLE-hibiscus (Aq.)PC-11B. subtilis24.80±1.5010.60±0.8222.80±1.8009.00±1.968.90.50±1.5025.00±0.192E. coli24.00±1.3212.80±0.9623.40±1.2010.80±1.2507.40±1.2025.90±0.48CH-AgNPs: chemical synthesized silver nanoparticles; CH-AuNPs: chemical synthesized gold nanoparticles; Bio-AgNPs: biological synthesized silver nanoparticles; Bio-AuNPs: biological synthesized gold nanoparticles; HLE: hibiscus leaf extract (aqueous); PC-(1): positive control (tetracycline).


### 3.7. Calculation of Toxic Effect Value (TEV) in Percentage

By plugging absorbance values into equation-X (see Section2.6.1.), TEV of chemical synthesized NPs was calculated in both the k1 and k2 groups.CH-AgNPs ofk1: PI=1−−0.3952/−2.7151×100=PI=85.45%,TEV=85.45,CH-AgNPs ofk2: PI=1−−0.4368/−2.6915×100=PI=83.77%,TEV=83.77,CH-AuNPs ofk1: PI=1−−1.8072/−2.7151×100=PI=33.51%,TEV=33.51,CH-AuNPs ofk2: PI=1−−1.3396/−2.6915×100=PI=36.85%,TEV=36.85.The data on toxicity clearly shows that CH-AgNPs are more toxic than CH-AuNPs.By plugging absorbance values into equation-X (see Section2.6.1.), TEV of biologically synthesized NPs were calculated in both the k1 and k2 groups.Bio-AgNPs ofk1: PI=1−−1.2026/−2.7151×100=PI=55.75%,TEV=55.75,Bio-AgNPs ofk2: PI=1−−1.2269/−2.6915×100=PI=54.42%,TEV=54.42,Bio-AuNPs ofk1: PI=1−−2.0829/−2.7151×100=PI=23.36%,TEV=23.36,Bio-AuNPs ofk2: PI=1−−2.0330/−2.6915×100=PI=24.46%,TEV=24.46.CH-AgNPs had the highest TEV, with 85.45% and 83.77%, compared to Bio-AgNPs, which had 55.75% and 54.42% for both thek1 and k2 groups, respectively. In the k1 and k2 groups, CH-AuNPs have 33.51 and 36.85%, whereas Bio-AuNPs have 23.36% and 24.46%, respectively. A nonsignificant difference in TEV of CH-Ag/AuNP (Figure 11(a)) and Bio-Ag/AuNP (Figure 11(b)) solutions was found in both the k1 and k2 groups. The following is the pattern of the TEV of CH-Ag/AuNPs and Bio-Ag/AuNPs in decreasing order.Figure 11
A comparison of toxic effect values (TEV) using the ToxTrak test as anin vitro. (a) CH-Ag/AuNPs vs. both bacterial species B. subtilis and E. coli. (b) Bio-Ag/AuNPs vs. both bacterial species B. subtilis and E. coli.
(a)(b)CH-AgNPs for thek1 group > CH-AgNPs for k2 group >Bio-AgNPs for k1 group > Bio-AgNPs for k2 group > CH-AuNPs for k2 group > CH-AuNPs for k1 group > Bio-AuNPs for k2 group > Bio-AgNPs for k1 group. When comparing silver NPs to gold NPs, as well as chemical vs biological methods, biologically synthesized (Ag and Au) NPs have lower toxicity than chemically synthesized (Ag and Au) NPs Figures 11(a) and 11(b). On the other hand, the chemical vs. biological method, AgNPs vs. AuNPs, and bacterial species k1 vs. k2 group, finding results were depicted in Figures 12(a) and 12(b). When comparing AgNPs vs. AuNPs in both bacterial species k1 and k2, a significant TEV difference was observed in the chemical vs. biological method. The process of whole organisms’ uptake and accumulating NPs was less well understood. However, it is clear how whole organisms will react to NPs in their bodies, but how can a possibility of translocation within the body be left to fat droplets [61, 62]. NPs can enter cells by diffusing into the cell membrane via adhesion and endocytosis, according to some studies [63–65]. In higher organisms, such as marine invertebrates, where silver bioaccumulation is relatively quick compared to other trace metals, endocytosis appears to explain silver NP toxicity. Silver can be taken up by transporters in the ionic form because its properties are most similar to sodium and copper ions [66, 67]. The mechanism by which the gut community (gut microbiota) induces its effect is not through translocation, but rather dysbiosis. This process occurs naturally as a result of aging. Aerobic bacteria dominate the gut at birth and are altered in the first weeks to form an anaerobic dominated environment. By adolescences, the gut has the highest proportion of Bifidobacteria and Clostridia that it ever will and will then begin to stabilize throughout adulthood. In old age, the gut community shows a decrease in Bifidobacteria (genus) and Bacteroidetes (phylum), an increase in Firmicutes (phylum), and overall shows an increase in the number of facultative anaerobes. The percentage inhibition of invitro toxicity of chemical and biological synthesized Ag/Au NPs was investigated in this study, and it was discovered that biological synthesized both Ag/AuNPs are less toxic, more friendly and biocompatible to human gut microbial community probiotics as compared to chemical synthesized Ag/AuNPs. Our findings corroborate previous research, which found that CH-AgNPs are more toxic than Bio-AgNPs from different plant species and algae [68–71]. Our findings suggest that, in comparison to chemically synthesized Ag/AuNPs, biologically synthesized Ag/AuNPs may be a good alternative for coating antibiotic drugs for pharma industries. The upper coatings of nanoparticles on the drugs may be more effective for killing pathogenic bacteria and safe for humans because biologically synthesized Ag/AuNPs are very less toxic and also less harmful to probiotics present in the human gut in the form of probiotic bacteria.Figure 12
A comparison of silver and gold nanoparticles toxicity synthesized from chemical (CH-NPs) and biological (Bio-NPs) methods: (a)B. subtilis and (b) B. coli.
(a)(b)


## 3.1. UV–Vis Spectroscopy

In the UV-Vis spectra of CH-AgNPs and CH-AuNPs, the plasmon peak was found at 414 nm with absorption of 0.77 and 530 nm with absorption of 1.20, respectively (Figures1(a) and2(a)). The surface plasmon peak in Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs was observed at 410 nm with absorption of 3.52 and at 525 nm with an absorption of 0.98, respectively (Figures 3(a) and 4(a)). In CH-AgNP, the broadening of the peak indicated that the particles are polydispersed. The formation of polydispersed large NPs due to slow reduction rates was indicated by broadening of the peak [40–44].


## 3.2. TEM Analysis of Nanoparticles

The morphology, particle shape, size, and distribution profile of Ag/AuNPs was revealed by TEM images. Figure5(a) depicts CH-AgNPs in cuboidal, hexagonal, and spherical shapes, with spherical shapes being the most common and average sizes of 50.56 nm at 100 nm scale and 200 kV accelerating voltage analysis. CH-AuNPs, on the other hand, had an average size of 25.98 nm at 100 nm scale with 200 kV accelerating voltage analysis and appeared to have a spherical morphology (Figure 5(b)). When sodium citrate was used as the reducing agent, spherical and ellipsoidal AgNPs with sizes ranging from 20 to 60 nm were obtained [45]. On the other hand, Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs with cubic, hexagonal, and spherical shapes with average sizes of 25.25 and 16.65 nm were obtained, respectively (Figure 6(a) and 6(b)). Biological synthesized AuNPs with size ranges of 15 to 55 nm with pseudospherical, triangular, and hexagonal [46–50]. All observed NPs are uniformly distributed in various sizes without significant agglomeration.Figure 5
TEM monograph of chemical synthesized nanoparticles (a) CH-AgNPs and (b) CH-AuNPs.
(a)(b)Figure 6
TEM monograph of biological synthesized nanoparticles: (a) Bio-AgNPs and (B) Bio-AuNPs.
(a)(b)


## 3.3. Zeta Potential Analysis

Surface zeta potentials were measured using a zeta analyzer in order to study the stability of NPs, which is critical for many applications. The pH of liquid NP samples (5 mL) was adjusted to the required value by diluting them with double distilled water (50 mL). For 30 minutes, the samples were shaken. The zeta potential of the metallic particles was measured after shaking. The surface potential of NPs was determined using a zeta potential. The CH-AgNPs and CH-AuNPs solutions had zeta potentials of -29.18 mV and -18.30 mV, respectively, with a single peak indicating the presence of repulsion among the synthesized NPs (Figures7(a) and 7(b)). Meanwhile, the zeta potential of the Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs solutions was -23.19 mV and -23.90 mV, respectively (Figures 8(a) and 8(b)). When all of the particles in a suspension have a large negative or positive zeta potential, they repel one another and have no tendency to clump together. There will be no force to keep the particles from colliding and flocculating if their zeta potential values are low (S. [51]). The zeta potential of chemical and biosynthesized Ag/AuNPs was found to be negative, indicating that they repel each other and increasing the formulation’s stability.Figure 7
Zeta potential distribution pattern: (a) CH-AgNPs (-29.18 mV) and (b) CH-AuNPs (-18.30 mV).
(a)(b)Figure 8
Zeta potential distribution pattern: (a) Bio-AgNPs (-23.19 mV) and (b) Bio-AuNPs (-23.90 mV).
(a)(b)


## 3.4. XRD Analysis

The powder XRD of silver nanoparticles reveals their crystalline nature. The crystalline structure of silver nanoparticles in powder form was investigated using XRD, and the results are consistent with previous research that revealed plausible silver metal peaks in Figure9(a) [52–54]. At 40°, 49°, 66°, 77°, and 83°, AgNPs display Bragg diffraction 2θ peaks, which correspond to 111, 200, 220, 311, and 222, respectively.Figure 9
XRD spectrum of synthesized AgNPs (a). EDX spectrum of synthesized AgNPs (b).
(a)(b)


## 3.5. EDX Analysis

The elemental composition of AgNPs was shown in Figure9(b). EDX investigation of silver nanoparticles at 3 keV detects the presence (10.01%), P (0.65%), S (0.45%), and Cl (0.46%). The studied sample also included the highest peak of C (88.43%). The Ag elemental peaks were identified at 1.00 and 3.00 keV.


## 3.6. Antibacterial Activity

Antibacterial activity was measured in zone of inhibition (mm in diameter), and the CH-AgNPs had high antibacterial activity of24.80±1.50 and 23.98±0.89, whereas the CH-AuNPs had moderate antibacterial activity of 10.60±0.82 and 12.80±0.90 against B. subtilis (Figure 10(a)) and E. coli (Figure 10(b)), respectively. Bio-AgNPs, on the other hand, had also excellent antibacterial activity 22.80±1.80 and 23.40±1.20, whereas Bio-AuNPs had poor antibacterial activity 09.60±1.91 and 10.70±1.22 against B. subtilis (Figure 10(a)) and E. coli (Figure 10(b)), respectively. Similar results were also reported for photosynthesized silver and gold NPs [42, 49, 55–57]. Tetracycline, a positive control and standard antibiotics, at 5 μg/disk, has good inhibitory activity 18.45±1.67 and 18.09±0.50 against B. subtilis and E. coli pathogens (Table 1). Our findings suggest that Bio-Ag/Au NPs have good antibacterial activity with low toxicity and could be a good antibiotic replacement. Despite the fact that NPs are widely used as antimicrobials, their mechanism is still unknown. Interference with cell wall synthesis, inhibition of protein synthesis, interference with nucleic acid synthesis, and inhibition of a metabolic pathway are all possible antimicrobial mechanisms [58, 59]. Nanomaterials can increase cell membrane permeability, interfere with DNA replication, denature bacterial proteins, and release silver ions within the bacterial cell [60].Figure 10
A comparison of antibacterial potential between zone of inhibition (mm) and no. of replicates of CH-Ag/AuNPs, Bio-Ag/AuNPs, and a standard control tetracycline antibiotic against (a)B. subtilis and (b) E. coli.
(a)(b)Table 1
Antibacterial activity of CH-Ag/AuNPs and Bio-Ag/AuNPs againstB. subtilis and E. coli.
S.no.Name of the organismZone of inhibition (mm in diameter)CH-AgNPsCH-AuNPsBio-AgNPsBio-AuNPsHLE-hibiscus (Aq.)PC-11B. subtilis24.80±1.5010.60±0.8222.80±1.8009.00±1.968.90.50±1.5025.00±0.192E. coli24.00±1.3212.80±0.9623.40±1.2010.80±1.2507.40±1.2025.90±0.48CH-AgNPs: chemical synthesized silver nanoparticles; CH-AuNPs: chemical synthesized gold nanoparticles; Bio-AgNPs: biological synthesized silver nanoparticles; Bio-AuNPs: biological synthesized gold nanoparticles; HLE: hibiscus leaf extract (aqueous); PC-(1): positive control (tetracycline).


## 3.7. Calculation of Toxic Effect Value (TEV) in Percentage

By plugging absorbance values into equation-X (see Section2.6.1.), TEV of chemical synthesized NPs was calculated in both the k1 and k2 groups.CH-AgNPs ofk1: PI=1−−0.3952/−2.7151×100=PI=85.45%,TEV=85.45,CH-AgNPs ofk2: PI=1−−0.4368/−2.6915×100=PI=83.77%,TEV=83.77,CH-AuNPs ofk1: PI=1−−1.8072/−2.7151×100=PI=33.51%,TEV=33.51,CH-AuNPs ofk2: PI=1−−1.3396/−2.6915×100=PI=36.85%,TEV=36.85.The data on toxicity clearly shows that CH-AgNPs are more toxic than CH-AuNPs.By plugging absorbance values into equation-X (see Section2.6.1.), TEV of biologically synthesized NPs were calculated in both the k1 and k2 groups.Bio-AgNPs ofk1: PI=1−−1.2026/−2.7151×100=PI=55.75%,TEV=55.75,Bio-AgNPs ofk2: PI=1−−1.2269/−2.6915×100=PI=54.42%,TEV=54.42,Bio-AuNPs ofk1: PI=1−−2.0829/−2.7151×100=PI=23.36%,TEV=23.36,Bio-AuNPs ofk2: PI=1−−2.0330/−2.6915×100=PI=24.46%,TEV=24.46.CH-AgNPs had the highest TEV, with 85.45% and 83.77%, compared to Bio-AgNPs, which had 55.75% and 54.42% for both thek1 and k2 groups, respectively. In the k1 and k2 groups, CH-AuNPs have 33.51 and 36.85%, whereas Bio-AuNPs have 23.36% and 24.46%, respectively. A nonsignificant difference in TEV of CH-Ag/AuNP (Figure 11(a)) and Bio-Ag/AuNP (Figure 11(b)) solutions was found in both the k1 and k2 groups. The following is the pattern of the TEV of CH-Ag/AuNPs and Bio-Ag/AuNPs in decreasing order.Figure 11
A comparison of toxic effect values (TEV) using the ToxTrak test as anin vitro. (a) CH-Ag/AuNPs vs. both bacterial species B. subtilis and E. coli. (b) Bio-Ag/AuNPs vs. both bacterial species B. subtilis and E. coli.
(a)(b)CH-AgNPs for thek1 group > CH-AgNPs for k2 group >Bio-AgNPs for k1 group > Bio-AgNPs for k2 group > CH-AuNPs for k2 group > CH-AuNPs for k1 group > Bio-AuNPs for k2 group > Bio-AgNPs for k1 group. When comparing silver NPs to gold NPs, as well as chemical vs biological methods, biologically synthesized (Ag and Au) NPs have lower toxicity than chemically synthesized (Ag and Au) NPs Figures 11(a) and 11(b). On the other hand, the chemical vs. biological method, AgNPs vs. AuNPs, and bacterial species k1 vs. k2 group, finding results were depicted in Figures 12(a) and 12(b). When comparing AgNPs vs. AuNPs in both bacterial species k1 and k2, a significant TEV difference was observed in the chemical vs. biological method. The process of whole organisms’ uptake and accumulating NPs was less well understood. However, it is clear how whole organisms will react to NPs in their bodies, but how can a possibility of translocation within the body be left to fat droplets [61, 62]. NPs can enter cells by diffusing into the cell membrane via adhesion and endocytosis, according to some studies [63–65]. In higher organisms, such as marine invertebrates, where silver bioaccumulation is relatively quick compared to other trace metals, endocytosis appears to explain silver NP toxicity. Silver can be taken up by transporters in the ionic form because its properties are most similar to sodium and copper ions [66, 67]. The mechanism by which the gut community (gut microbiota) induces its effect is not through translocation, but rather dysbiosis. This process occurs naturally as a result of aging. Aerobic bacteria dominate the gut at birth and are altered in the first weeks to form an anaerobic dominated environment. By adolescences, the gut has the highest proportion of Bifidobacteria and Clostridia that it ever will and will then begin to stabilize throughout adulthood. In old age, the gut community shows a decrease in Bifidobacteria (genus) and Bacteroidetes (phylum), an increase in Firmicutes (phylum), and overall shows an increase in the number of facultative anaerobes. The percentage inhibition of invitro toxicity of chemical and biological synthesized Ag/Au NPs was investigated in this study, and it was discovered that biological synthesized both Ag/AuNPs are less toxic, more friendly and biocompatible to human gut microbial community probiotics as compared to chemical synthesized Ag/AuNPs. Our findings corroborate previous research, which found that CH-AgNPs are more toxic than Bio-AgNPs from different plant species and algae [68–71]. Our findings suggest that, in comparison to chemically synthesized Ag/AuNPs, biologically synthesized Ag/AuNPs may be a good alternative for coating antibiotic drugs for pharma industries. The upper coatings of nanoparticles on the drugs may be more effective for killing pathogenic bacteria and safe for humans because biologically synthesized Ag/AuNPs are very less toxic and also less harmful to probiotics present in the human gut in the form of probiotic bacteria.Figure 12
A comparison of silver and gold nanoparticles toxicity synthesized from chemical (CH-NPs) and biological (Bio-NPs) methods: (a)B. subtilis and (b) B. coli.
(a)(b)


## 4. Conclusion

In this work, silver and gold nanoparticles were synthesized using two methods: chemical and biological. The nanoparticles were characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopy, TEM, XRD, EDX, and zeta potential analyzers. The ToxTrak test was applied asin vitro to measure the toxicity of synthesized nanoparticles as well as antibacterial activity against Gram-positive (B. subtilis) and Gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria after satisfactory characterization. The ToxTrak results show that CH-AgNPs are more hazardous than Bio-AgNPs, having a higher TEV/PI value. Similar patterns were seen with CH-AuNPs, which had somewhat higher TEV than Bio-AuNPs. When Ag/Au NPs were examined for antibacterial activity, the following pattern emerged: CH-AgNPs < Bio-AgNPs < CH-AuNPs < Bio-AuNPs, whereas the control sample (tetracycline antibiotic) revealed a highest zone of inhabitation. Overall, Bio-AgNPs and Bio-AuNPs are the most effective pathogen-killing materials with the lowest toxicity. Our findings show that biologically synthesized Ag/AuNPs might be a suitable alternative to chemically synthesized Ag/AuNPs for coating antimicrobial medicines in the pharmaceutical industry. Because biologically synthesized Ag/AuNPs are less toxic and also less destructive to probiotics present in the human gut in the form of probiotic bacteria, the upper coatings of nanoparticles on the drugs may be more effective for destroying pathogenic bacteria and safe for humans.



---

*Source: 3773943-2021-12-30.xml*