# Evaluation of a Culturally Adapted Training in Indigenous Mental Health and Wellbeing for the Alcohol and Other Drug Workforce

Authors: Rachael Hinton; Tricia Nagel
Journal: ISRN Public Health
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Indigenous Australians have high rates of mental illness comorbid with substance misuse. The complex needs of this client group create challenges for the alcohol and other drug (AOD) workforce. This paper  describes the outcomes of an Indigenous-specific “Yarning about Mental Health” training for the AOD workforce to strengthen knowledge and skills in mental health approaches and in their engagement with Indigenous clients. The training provides culturally adapted strategies and tools for understanding mental health, promoting wellbeing, and delivering brief interventions in the substance misuse setting. A nonexperimental evaluation which incorporated pre-post questionnaires was conducted with workshop participants attending one of four trainings. The training was perceived to be highly appropriate and helpful in participants’ work with Indigenous AOD clients. There was significant improvement in confidence and knowledge related to Indigenous mental health and wellbeing and qualitative data supported these positive outcomes. This study supports the need to blend Indigenous concepts of health and wellbeing with non-Indigenous ways of understanding and treating illness in order to develop services which are appropriate to Indigenous peoples. It also suggests research is required to understand whether self-reported increases in knowledge and confidence can translate into behavioural changes in participants' teaching and practice of culturally competent care and to improved client outcomes.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Mental illness is associated with substantial disability, yet many people with mental disorders do not seek help from any health professional for their mental health problems [1]. In Australia, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are even less likely than non-Indigenous people to access treatment [2], with a contributing factor being that some existing services lack the capacity to take account of Indigenous conceptualisations of health and wellbeing [3]. In using the term Indigenous we refer to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and acknowledge their diversity of language and culture. Indigenous people do not necessarily distinguish between wellbeing and “physical” health or “mental” health or “cultural” or “spiritual” wellbeing; instead, they have a “whole of life” view [4]. Furthermore, Indigenous Australians have high rates of mental illness comorbid with substance misuse. It is particularly important, therefore, to provide mental health care at first point of contact, especially in alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment settings.Alcohol and other drug services are reporting a steady increase in the number of Indigenous clients with comorbid mental health problems [5], many of whom are at higher risk of relapse, self-harm, and suicide [6]. The complex needs of this client group create challenges for the AOD workforce in terms of engagement, resources and skills [7]. The need to build the capacity of this heterogeneous workforce (which includes non-AOD health professionals, social professionals; AOD specialist health professionals, such as psychologists and counselors; AOD workers and nonhealth professionals, e.g., managers) in mental health care is well documented [5, 8–11], and resources and training have proliferated in the past decade aligned with changing policy priorities [12].Australian guidelines on the management of cooccurring alcohol and other drug and mental health conditions provide evidence-based information to assist with the management of comorbid AOD and mental health conditions [11, 13]. Standardised tools such as Psycheck can be used by the AOD workforce to screen for symptoms of mental health conditions in their clients [14] and an Indigenous-specific assessment, the Indigenous risk impact Screen (IRIS), assists with detection of AOD problems and some mental health risks [15]. Despite these resources, it remains a challenge for AOD services to empower consumers [16] and provide recovery oriented client-centred care that respects lived experience, promotes mutual self-help, is holistic and looks beyond symptoms and illness [17]. A specific challenge for these services is the need to adapt treatment approaches to different cultural contexts. Many Indigenous people live in remote and rural areas with limited access to specialist mental health services [18] and marked differences exist in literacy, language, and worldview [19] which further complicates accurate and sensitive assessment and treatment. In the light of these difficulties, there is a need to develop culturally adapted psychological interventions that can be delivered in AOD settings.Studies among New Zealand Māori AOD treatment workers have shown that both Māori and Western knowledge bases and practices are seen as not only equally relevant but also complementary in the treatment of addiction for Maori people. Accordingly, it is recommended that specific training for this workforce integrate Māori and Western knowledge, skills and processes of learning [20]. Similarly in Australia, Indigenous-specific mental health training is needed for the AOD workforce which integrates Indigenous cultural frameworks and recognises the historical, cultural, and political forces that affect the health of Indigenous people [21]. The priority is the delivery of culturally appropriate health care, which acknowledges and promotes cultural identity, links with traditional ways of communication and incorporates different understandings of health and identity [22].The Aboriginal and Islander Mental health initiative (AIMhi) has developed a brief, culturally adapted intervention for strengthening mental health and wellbeing in Indigenous communities [23]. The AIMhi approach promotes consumer empowerment. It applies a recovery focus through therapeutic goal setting, motivation, and recognition of the family and community context of the individual client. AIMhi developed tools and resources that support each step of engagement of Indigenous people in services: mental health literacy, assessment, screening, early intervention, treatment, and outcome measurement. The Indigenous-specific training program, “Yarning about Mental Health”, integrates the tools developed in the AIMhi program and is provided by a five person training team, three of whom are Indigenous. The name of the training incorporates a commonly used word in parts of Australia for having an informal conversation, that is, “to have a yarn.” The training is delivered in flexible workshop formats (two hour, half-day, full-day, and two-day training) in either urban centres or remote communities. It incorporates different learning styles (uses simple English, audio, pictorial, and interactive methods), literacy levels, and Indigenous cultural frameworks, including a holistic concept of health and wellbeing. It was developed to provide service provider training in cross-cultural approaches to mental health with the aim of translating research outcomes into specialist and primary care settings. The Yarning about Mental Health training has since been adapted to different health settings including chronic disease and alcohol and other drug treatment. As a result, demand for training and resources have increased across a broad range of practitioners including youth services, perinatal, and child and maternal health services.The authors recognise that education and training comprise only a part of workforce development, taking equal places with support strategies for skills and knowledge and workplace structure and policy [9]. This paper focuses on describing the outcomes of Yarning about Mental Health training, the first stage (2008–2010) of a workforce development project which provided Indigenous-specific training for the AOD workforce to strengthen knowledge and skills in recovery approaches and in their engagement with Indigenous clients. The second stage of the project (2008 to 2010) provided a train the trainer component for participants of the Yarning about Mental Health training, while the third and final stage, completed in 2011, examined the application of the training in practice. The aim of the current study was to measure the effectiveness of the one day Yarning about Mental Health training in strengthening the knowledge and confidence of the AOD workforce in mental health assessment, screening, early intervention, and treatment specific to their Indigenous clients.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. Description of the Training

The Yarning about Mental Health training is embedded within a consumer empowerment and recovery approach and provides culturally appropriate strategies and tools for understanding mental health, promoting wellbeing and delivering brief interventions in the setting of mental illness, substance misuse, and physical illness. The content is described in the “Yarning About Mental Health” training manual [24] and covers the following: Indigenous concepts of mental health and wellbeing, strengths-based care planning, early warning signs, goal setting, risk assessment, mental state examination, and medication. Participants are trained in the use of strengths based approaches and resources and materials are designed to be used specifically with Indigenous people, including the “mental health stay strong care plan package,” flip charts and information sheets on depression, mania, psychosis, dementia, delirium, and medication [23].From 2008 to 2010, four Yarning about Mental Health one-day training workshops were conducted with members of Western Australian Network of Alcohol and other Drug Agencies (WANADA) and Network of Alcohol and Drug Agencies (NADA). Each workshop was followed by a one-day train the trainer workshop. The training was in response to a request from both networks to address the identified gap in knowledge, confidence, and skills within the AOD workforce in addressing mental health and wellbeing issues specifically among Indigenous clients. Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants attended one of the four workshops held in Kununurra and Albany in Western Australia and in Sydney, New South Wales.


### 2.2. Ethics

The project received approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Territory Department of Health and Families and the Menzies School of Health Research. Informed consent was obtained from participants prior to the pre-workshop evaluation. Confidentiality was maintained by the allocation of a unique identification number, necessary for matching pre- and post-workshop responses.


### 2.3. Evaluation

The design was a nonexperimental evaluation which incorporated pre-post questionnaires with workshop participants attending the Yarning about Mental Health training workshops. A structured questionnaire incorporating ordinal scales and open-ended questions complemented the quantitative data to provide further insight into participant’s perspectives and experiences. Participants completed questionnaires at the beginning of the training (pre-workshop) and at the end of the training (post-workshop). The findings of post-training questionnaires administered immediately following the train the trainer workshop as well as 12–24 months after the workshop are outside the scope of the paper and a detailed discussion of this data is forthcoming.The pre-workshop questionnaire included sociodemographic questions and examined experience, training, and current client load. Participants were asked about confidence in assessment and treatment of Indigenous people with mental illness and their knowledge of causes, treatment, and early warning signs of mental health problems, specifically for Indigenous people. Knowledge and confidence were rated on a scale from 1 (not much/not confident) to 9 (a lot/very confident). Participants were also asked to rate their use of AIMhi resources on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (all of the time). The post-workshop questionnaire included the same questions with additional questions rating the training on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 4 (very) in terms of usefulness, interest, and building of cross-cultural partnerships.


### 2.4. Analysis

Analysis was conducted using the statistical data analysis program “STATA” [25] and Wilcoxon’s signed rank tests were used to compare trainees’ mental health knowledge and confidence at baseline and after training. Summative scales rated knowledge and confidence on a scale of 1 to 9 as low (1–3), medium (4–6), and high (7–9).


## 2.1. Description of the Training

The Yarning about Mental Health training is embedded within a consumer empowerment and recovery approach and provides culturally appropriate strategies and tools for understanding mental health, promoting wellbeing and delivering brief interventions in the setting of mental illness, substance misuse, and physical illness. The content is described in the “Yarning About Mental Health” training manual [24] and covers the following: Indigenous concepts of mental health and wellbeing, strengths-based care planning, early warning signs, goal setting, risk assessment, mental state examination, and medication. Participants are trained in the use of strengths based approaches and resources and materials are designed to be used specifically with Indigenous people, including the “mental health stay strong care plan package,” flip charts and information sheets on depression, mania, psychosis, dementia, delirium, and medication [23].From 2008 to 2010, four Yarning about Mental Health one-day training workshops were conducted with members of Western Australian Network of Alcohol and other Drug Agencies (WANADA) and Network of Alcohol and Drug Agencies (NADA). Each workshop was followed by a one-day train the trainer workshop. The training was in response to a request from both networks to address the identified gap in knowledge, confidence, and skills within the AOD workforce in addressing mental health and wellbeing issues specifically among Indigenous clients. Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants attended one of the four workshops held in Kununurra and Albany in Western Australia and in Sydney, New South Wales.


## 2.2. Ethics

The project received approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Territory Department of Health and Families and the Menzies School of Health Research. Informed consent was obtained from participants prior to the pre-workshop evaluation. Confidentiality was maintained by the allocation of a unique identification number, necessary for matching pre- and post-workshop responses.


## 2.3. Evaluation

The design was a nonexperimental evaluation which incorporated pre-post questionnaires with workshop participants attending the Yarning about Mental Health training workshops. A structured questionnaire incorporating ordinal scales and open-ended questions complemented the quantitative data to provide further insight into participant’s perspectives and experiences. Participants completed questionnaires at the beginning of the training (pre-workshop) and at the end of the training (post-workshop). The findings of post-training questionnaires administered immediately following the train the trainer workshop as well as 12–24 months after the workshop are outside the scope of the paper and a detailed discussion of this data is forthcoming.The pre-workshop questionnaire included sociodemographic questions and examined experience, training, and current client load. Participants were asked about confidence in assessment and treatment of Indigenous people with mental illness and their knowledge of causes, treatment, and early warning signs of mental health problems, specifically for Indigenous people. Knowledge and confidence were rated on a scale from 1 (not much/not confident) to 9 (a lot/very confident). Participants were also asked to rate their use of AIMhi resources on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (all of the time). The post-workshop questionnaire included the same questions with additional questions rating the training on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 4 (very) in terms of usefulness, interest, and building of cross-cultural partnerships.


## 2.4. Analysis

Analysis was conducted using the statistical data analysis program “STATA” [25] and Wilcoxon’s signed rank tests were used to compare trainees’ mental health knowledge and confidence at baseline and after training. Summative scales rated knowledge and confidence on a scale of 1 to 9 as low (1–3), medium (4–6), and high (7–9).


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Characteristics of Participants

Fifty-nine members of the AOD workforce participated in four workshops and the majority (75%) of participants was female. Most participants identified as AOD workers or AOD counsellors, mental health and allied health workers. Although over half of participants had formal mental health training and worked in partnership with Indigenous colleagues, most were relatively new to the care of Indigenous clients (Table1).Table 1
Participant self-reported workplace experience and training.
Participant characteristicsValuen (%)Female*43 (75.4)Service provider roleAOD worker/AOD counsellor12 (20.3)Mental health worker10 (16.9)Allied health worker10 (16.9)Coordinator/manager7 (11.8)Case worker/counsellor7 (11.8)Aboriginal mental health worker4  (6.7)Other8 (15.2)Number of current clients#0–524 (41.4)6–1015 (25.9)11–208 (13.8)>209 (15.5)Unknown1 (1.7)Formal training in mental health<2 weeks14 (23.7)2 weeks to 3 months12 (20.3)>3 months32 (54.2)Unknown1 (1.7)Years experience working in Indigenous mental health†<2 years30 (51.7)2–5 years11 (19)>5 years17 (29.3)Work in partnership with Indigenous colleagues‡None5 (8.9)Little11 (19.6)Some7 (12.5)Most9 (16.1)All the time24 (42.9)*2 values missing; #2 values missing; †1 value missing; ‡3 values missing.


### 3.2. Knowledge and Confidence

Fifty-nine participants completed the pre- and post-workshop questionnaire. Pre-to-post workshop comparison of confidence and knowledge showed significant change in all measures excluding “knowledge of the cause of mental illness” (Table2). Post-workshop participants reported improved knowledge of the warning signs and treatment of mental illness and in levels of confidence to assess, treat and communicate with Indigenous mental health clients. There was a significant increase in confidence in treatment and assessment irrespective of participants’ level of training and experience.Table 2
Participant mental health knowledge and confidencea.
SubscalePre-trainingM (SD)Post-trainingM (SD)Wilcoxonz (P)Know about causes6.77 (1.78)7.28 (1.43)−1.199 (0.2306)Know about treatment5.82 (2.08)7.12 (1.46)−3.932 (0.0001)Know early warning signs5.87 (2.11)6.91 (1.74)−2.931 (0.034)Confidence to communicate5.78 (2.06)6.98 (1.65)−3.251 (0.0012)Confidence to assess4.96 (1.97)6.81 (1.65)−4.511 (0.0000)Confidence to treat4.79 (2.10)6.64 (1.88)−4.453 (0.0000)aScale 1–9. Higher score indicative of a greater level of confidence and knowledge of mental health.Participants (n=15) described increased access to practical tools and resources for use with Indigenous clients, as an Allied Health Worker explained:[It was a] really good engaging workshop…developed really usable skills & engendered confidence in working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with mental health concerns.The training helped participants to overcome lack of confidence in working cross-culturally with comorbid clients as an AOD counsellor highlighted:I have learnt a lot from this training and feel very confident now to work with people …. It is not fear based anymore.


### 3.3. Usefulness and Interest in AIMhi Resources

At baseline, the majority of participants (n=36, 63%) were either not aware of or not regularly using any AIMhi resources. AIMhi flipcharts (n=19, 33%) were the resources most commonly used, followed by AIMhi information sheets (n=16, 28%). All of the participants agreed after the workshop that the training would be beneficial and useful in their work with Indigenous clients (Table 3). In particular 81% of participants found the workshop very interesting and 88% indicated that the resources were very helpful. Many (60%) of the participants commented that the culturally appropriate strategies and resources would promote better communication and understanding between the AOD workforce and Indigenous clients; for example:Table 3
Participant post-workshop ratings of the Yarning about Mental Health training.
ItemA littlen (%)Somen (%)A lotn (%)Workshop was interesting11 (19)46 (81)Resources are useful7 (12)50 (88)Training and resources build my confidence and knowledge6 (11)51 (89)Training will help me to build cross cultural partnerships1 (2)10 (17)46 (81)[I was] very impressed with the resources—our client group will understand and feel included in the process (AOD counsellor).The majority of participants (89%) reported that the training and resources would contribute to building confidence and knowledge in the assessment and treatment of mental illness among Indigenous AOD clients. Participants were also asked to consider the extent to which the training and resources would help to build cross-cultural partnerships in assessment and treatment of mental illness. The majority of participants (81%) responded that the training and resources would be beneficial, for example,The more information the better and trying this different educational material, it would benefit myself, clients and community (Aboriginal mental health worker).Several participants (n=7) noted that the training and resources would also contribute to the creation of a more mutually beneficial and less intimidating relationship between client and practitioner:This is something I can use easily … I have had trouble getting clients to come up with smaller realistic goals and small steps they can make rather than do everything and when I suggest things to them they feel frustrated (Aboriginal Mental Health Worker).


### 3.4. Experience of the Workshop and Knowledge Translation

The final two questions of the post-workshop questionnaire asked participants to consider their experience of the workshop and opportunities for change in practice. Fifty-one (86%) participants responded to the question on their experience and the majority (n=49) gave a response that aggregated to one of two main themes: satisfaction with the process of the workshop and usefulness and applicability of training content. Positive comments from participants about the process related to the workshop structure, the interactive and engaging delivery, the benefits of having a mix of Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants and the apparent experience and knowledge of the trainers, including the inclusion of Aboriginal co-trainers:Fantastic. Interesting informative, well presented. Tools are colourful well thought out & a delight to use. The knowledge skills and experience of the facilitators shines through (Role unknown).Excellent quality training and training style. Great to have Aboriginal co-trainers. Loved the simplicity of how the resource is delivered and used (AOD worker).Participants’ responses to workshop applicability related to the culturally-specific information, tools, strategies, and resources that were introduced and examined as part of the training. This practical approach appeared to help to demystify and simplify the management of mental health and wellbeing concerns of Indigenous AOD clients, and in turn, provide participants with new skills, knowledge and confidence to apply their learning in practice. As several participants explained:I really enjoyed the training. I have been thinking on easy ways to engage with teenagers and I believe this will really be useful. It was clear, simple, to the point and it provided me with tools that increase my confidence with the therapy (Mental Health Worker).Five participants suggested ways to improve the training, which in all cases related to practical outcomes and the application of the tools. Their responses could also reflect the different experience and knowledge among the professional mix of participants and the challenge of tailoring the training to meet this diversity:It was valuable, informative and helpful, but a little slow. There could be far more focus on the tool and its use. The tool is simple and streamlined, the training could be too (Mental Health Worker).Three main themes emerged from participants’ responses (n=47) to opportunities for practice change: the confirmation of their intended use of the tools (n=26, 55%); integration of the tools with existing resources and strategies (n=9, 19%) to increase their options for the management of individual clients and enhance current practice; and continuing to build a better understanding and relationships (n=16, 34%) between AOD workers and Indigenous clients with AOD and mental health comorbidities.


## 3.1. Characteristics of Participants

Fifty-nine members of the AOD workforce participated in four workshops and the majority (75%) of participants was female. Most participants identified as AOD workers or AOD counsellors, mental health and allied health workers. Although over half of participants had formal mental health training and worked in partnership with Indigenous colleagues, most were relatively new to the care of Indigenous clients (Table1).Table 1
Participant self-reported workplace experience and training.
Participant characteristicsValuen (%)Female*43 (75.4)Service provider roleAOD worker/AOD counsellor12 (20.3)Mental health worker10 (16.9)Allied health worker10 (16.9)Coordinator/manager7 (11.8)Case worker/counsellor7 (11.8)Aboriginal mental health worker4  (6.7)Other8 (15.2)Number of current clients#0–524 (41.4)6–1015 (25.9)11–208 (13.8)>209 (15.5)Unknown1 (1.7)Formal training in mental health<2 weeks14 (23.7)2 weeks to 3 months12 (20.3)>3 months32 (54.2)Unknown1 (1.7)Years experience working in Indigenous mental health†<2 years30 (51.7)2–5 years11 (19)>5 years17 (29.3)Work in partnership with Indigenous colleagues‡None5 (8.9)Little11 (19.6)Some7 (12.5)Most9 (16.1)All the time24 (42.9)*2 values missing; #2 values missing; †1 value missing; ‡3 values missing.


## 3.2. Knowledge and Confidence

Fifty-nine participants completed the pre- and post-workshop questionnaire. Pre-to-post workshop comparison of confidence and knowledge showed significant change in all measures excluding “knowledge of the cause of mental illness” (Table2). Post-workshop participants reported improved knowledge of the warning signs and treatment of mental illness and in levels of confidence to assess, treat and communicate with Indigenous mental health clients. There was a significant increase in confidence in treatment and assessment irrespective of participants’ level of training and experience.Table 2
Participant mental health knowledge and confidencea.
SubscalePre-trainingM (SD)Post-trainingM (SD)Wilcoxonz (P)Know about causes6.77 (1.78)7.28 (1.43)−1.199 (0.2306)Know about treatment5.82 (2.08)7.12 (1.46)−3.932 (0.0001)Know early warning signs5.87 (2.11)6.91 (1.74)−2.931 (0.034)Confidence to communicate5.78 (2.06)6.98 (1.65)−3.251 (0.0012)Confidence to assess4.96 (1.97)6.81 (1.65)−4.511 (0.0000)Confidence to treat4.79 (2.10)6.64 (1.88)−4.453 (0.0000)aScale 1–9. Higher score indicative of a greater level of confidence and knowledge of mental health.Participants (n=15) described increased access to practical tools and resources for use with Indigenous clients, as an Allied Health Worker explained:[It was a] really good engaging workshop…developed really usable skills & engendered confidence in working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with mental health concerns.The training helped participants to overcome lack of confidence in working cross-culturally with comorbid clients as an AOD counsellor highlighted:I have learnt a lot from this training and feel very confident now to work with people …. It is not fear based anymore.


## 3.3. Usefulness and Interest in AIMhi Resources

At baseline, the majority of participants (n=36, 63%) were either not aware of or not regularly using any AIMhi resources. AIMhi flipcharts (n=19, 33%) were the resources most commonly used, followed by AIMhi information sheets (n=16, 28%). All of the participants agreed after the workshop that the training would be beneficial and useful in their work with Indigenous clients (Table 3). In particular 81% of participants found the workshop very interesting and 88% indicated that the resources were very helpful. Many (60%) of the participants commented that the culturally appropriate strategies and resources would promote better communication and understanding between the AOD workforce and Indigenous clients; for example:Table 3
Participant post-workshop ratings of the Yarning about Mental Health training.
ItemA littlen (%)Somen (%)A lotn (%)Workshop was interesting11 (19)46 (81)Resources are useful7 (12)50 (88)Training and resources build my confidence and knowledge6 (11)51 (89)Training will help me to build cross cultural partnerships1 (2)10 (17)46 (81)[I was] very impressed with the resources—our client group will understand and feel included in the process (AOD counsellor).The majority of participants (89%) reported that the training and resources would contribute to building confidence and knowledge in the assessment and treatment of mental illness among Indigenous AOD clients. Participants were also asked to consider the extent to which the training and resources would help to build cross-cultural partnerships in assessment and treatment of mental illness. The majority of participants (81%) responded that the training and resources would be beneficial, for example,The more information the better and trying this different educational material, it would benefit myself, clients and community (Aboriginal mental health worker).Several participants (n=7) noted that the training and resources would also contribute to the creation of a more mutually beneficial and less intimidating relationship between client and practitioner:This is something I can use easily … I have had trouble getting clients to come up with smaller realistic goals and small steps they can make rather than do everything and when I suggest things to them they feel frustrated (Aboriginal Mental Health Worker).


## 3.4. Experience of the Workshop and Knowledge Translation

The final two questions of the post-workshop questionnaire asked participants to consider their experience of the workshop and opportunities for change in practice. Fifty-one (86%) participants responded to the question on their experience and the majority (n=49) gave a response that aggregated to one of two main themes: satisfaction with the process of the workshop and usefulness and applicability of training content. Positive comments from participants about the process related to the workshop structure, the interactive and engaging delivery, the benefits of having a mix of Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants and the apparent experience and knowledge of the trainers, including the inclusion of Aboriginal co-trainers:Fantastic. Interesting informative, well presented. Tools are colourful well thought out & a delight to use. The knowledge skills and experience of the facilitators shines through (Role unknown).Excellent quality training and training style. Great to have Aboriginal co-trainers. Loved the simplicity of how the resource is delivered and used (AOD worker).Participants’ responses to workshop applicability related to the culturally-specific information, tools, strategies, and resources that were introduced and examined as part of the training. This practical approach appeared to help to demystify and simplify the management of mental health and wellbeing concerns of Indigenous AOD clients, and in turn, provide participants with new skills, knowledge and confidence to apply their learning in practice. As several participants explained:I really enjoyed the training. I have been thinking on easy ways to engage with teenagers and I believe this will really be useful. It was clear, simple, to the point and it provided me with tools that increase my confidence with the therapy (Mental Health Worker).Five participants suggested ways to improve the training, which in all cases related to practical outcomes and the application of the tools. Their responses could also reflect the different experience and knowledge among the professional mix of participants and the challenge of tailoring the training to meet this diversity:It was valuable, informative and helpful, but a little slow. There could be far more focus on the tool and its use. The tool is simple and streamlined, the training could be too (Mental Health Worker).Three main themes emerged from participants’ responses (n=47) to opportunities for practice change: the confirmation of their intended use of the tools (n=26, 55%); integration of the tools with existing resources and strategies (n=9, 19%) to increase their options for the management of individual clients and enhance current practice; and continuing to build a better understanding and relationships (n=16, 34%) between AOD workers and Indigenous clients with AOD and mental health comorbidities.


## 4. Discussion

Culturally appropriate intervention strategies in Indigenous mental health can contribute to countering the disproportionate burden of disease in the Indigenous population through increasing accessing to services [13]. This study finds that culturally adapted brief mental health training was perceived to be highly appropriate and helpful in participants’ work with Indigenous AOD clients. The results show that the AOD workforce was initially low in confidence in assessment and treatment of Indigenous peoples with mental illness. Pre- to post-workshop scores highlight significant improvement in confidence and knowledge related to Indigenous mental health and qualitative data supported these positive outcomes. These findings are similar to other studies that have shown culturally adapted training, education, and resources can improve provider knowledge, self, efficacy [26], and competency [27].In the current context of high prevalence of emotional distress among Indigenous AOD clients, there is a particular need to resource and train the AOD workforce. This includes a need to blend Indigenous concepts of health and wellbeing and non-Indigenous ways of understanding and treating illness in order to develop services which are appropriate to Indigenous peoples [28–30] and to integrate recovery oriented approaches to mental health care. The overall findings of this study indicate that this culturally-specific client-centred training strengthened participants’ knowledge and skills in collaborative mental health care. The training also met the needs, interests, and perspectives of a diverse group of participants and was seen to be appropriate for AOD workers who have different experiences and levels of training.Despite a number of important findings, the results should be interpreted in the context of the study’s limitations. The majority of participants reported that they would change their practice as a result of the training, although the findings do not show the extent to which the training is sustained and implemented as part of routine clinical practice or whether it contributed to improved client outcomes. Mentoring, observation, and supervision of participants post-training was outside the scope of this project and other studies have shown that training of AOD practitioners in screening for mental health disorders, combined with supervision, improved detection rates, and the quality of interventions in AOD services [14]. The sample was also small and restricted to a specific sector, limiting the generalisability of the findings.


## 5. Conclusion

The study provides support for the use of AIMhi resources and approach to Indigenous mental health within the AOD workforce. The training is useful and applicable for experienced practitioners as well as those new to mental health. In the field of AOD workforce development, an important question for future research is whether self-reported increases in knowledge and confidence translate to changes in participants’ teaching and practice of culturally competent care and improved client outcomes.



---

*Source: 380581-2012-03-13.xml*