# Evaluation of Carbonisation Gas from Coal and Woody Biomass and Reduction Rate of Carbon Composite Pellets

Authors: Tateo Usui; Hirokazu Konishi; Kazuhira Ichikawa; Hideki Ono; Hirotoshi Kawabata; Francisco B. Pena; Matheus H. Souza; Alexandre A. Xavier; Paulo S. Assis
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semichar or semicharcoal were proposed from the measured results of the carbonisation gas release behaviour. The carbonisation was done under a rising temperature condition until arriving at a maximum carbonisation temperatureTc,max to release some volatile matter (VM). The starting point of reduction of carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 823 K under the rising temperature condition was observed at the reduction temperature TR = 833 K, only a little higher than Tc,max, which was the aimed phenomenon for semicharcoal composite pellets. As Tc,max increases, the emitted carbonisation gas volume increases, the residual VM decreases, and, as a whole, the total heat value of the carbonisation gas tends to increase monotonically. The effect of the particle size of the semicharcoal on the reduction rate was studied. When TR is higher than Tc,max, the reduction rate increases, as the particle size decreases. When TR is equal to Tc,max, there is no effect. With decreasing Tc,max, the activation energy Ea of semicharcoal decreases. The maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max may be optimised for reactivity (1/Ea) of semicharcoal and the total carbonisation gas volume or the heat value.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The exhaustion of natural resources (quantity and quality) and CO2 emission controls are becoming increasingly important in steel industry. A lot of steel engineers studied various means to decrease reducing agents at blast furnace for reduction of CO2 emissions [1]. For example, injection of waste plastics [2] and carbon-neutral materials such as biomass into the blast furnace is a better alternative [3, 4]. Especially, biomass has novel advantages, namely, no CO2 emissions because of carbon neutral. Production of carbon composite iron ore agglomerates having good reducibility and strength is becoming one of the most important subjects [5].In previous work, effective use of coal especially the carbonisation gas was discussed in prereduction of iron oxide pellets for total smelting reduction process [6–8]. From these carbonisation data, it was proposed that novel carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semichar or semicharcoal and the residual volatile matter (VM) in char or charcoal could be used effectively. On this basis, data analyses of the carbonisation gases from coal and woody biomass have also been carried out to evaluate their chemical and thermal possibility.


## 2. Background for the Present Work

Prereduction experiments of iron oxide pellets for the total smelting reduction process were carried out with coal carbonisation gas [6–8]. In other words, coal carbonisation gases from various coals under different heating patterns were evaluated through the degree of prereduction at various reduction temperatures.In the first step, three sorts of bituminous coal were carbonised under various rising temperature conditions (Table1, Figures 1 and 2). In Table 1, samples (including two sorts of wood) are arranged in order of increasing volatile matter (VM). In Figure 1, schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus for carbonisation of the coal (or wood chips) is shown. Constant flow rate of N2 was added to determine the flow rates of carbonisation gas components as follows [7]: the volume ratios of carbonisation gas components and N2 were measured by a gas chromatograph, and then, the comparison of each gas component to N2 yielded the absolute flow rate of each gas component [7]. Subsequently, the carbonisation gas mixed with N2 gas flowed out from the exit of the reactor and was filtered and cooled to remove the tar and the water, respectively. After that, the gas without tar and water was analysed by gas chromatography (Figure 3). In Figure 2, typical heat patterns of carbonisation at a heating rate rh = 200 K/h are shown. After arriving at the maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max, the carbonisation temperature Tc was maintained at Tc,max until total carbonisation time reached 360 min.Figure 1
Schematic view of experimental apparatus for carbonisation of coal (or wood chips) (dimensions in mm).Figure 2
Typical heating patterns of coal carbonisation from room temperature to maximum carbonisation temperatureTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K at a heating rate of 200 K/h and maintained at Tc,max until total carbonisation time reached 360 min.Figure 3
Schematic of the experimental apparatus for prereduction of iron oxide pellets by coal carbonisation gas (dimensions in mm).Table 1
Analyses of the samples used.
mass%
Sample
FC
VM
Ash
S
C
H
O
N
Newlands coal
58.9
25.9
15.2
0.50
71.5
5.24
6.15
1.40
Newcastle blend coal
58.7
32.8
8.5
0.54
74.8
4.90
9.27
1.97
Muswellbrook coal
55.2
36.5
8.3
0.70
76.0
4.93
8.51
1.57
Japanese cedar
12.05
87.38
0.57
0.01
52.52
6.76
40.4
0.03
Japanese cypress
8.12
90.8
1.08
0.014
50.7
6.16
41.1
1.01Variation of each gas component with time was measured by gas chromatography (Figure4). The reason to express the sum (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) for higher hydrocarbons is as follows: the present gas chromatograph could not divide the peaks of C2H4 and C2H6 and, moreover, the flow rates of C2H4, C2H6, and C3H8 were very small in comparison with the other gas components. In general, there was experimental error among each data set.Figure 4
Mole fraction of carbonisation gas as a function of carbonisation timet [6]. Carbonisation conditions: Muswellbrook coal: 1 kg, carrier gas: N2 1.0 L/min (s.t.p.), maximum carbonisation temperature (Tc,max): 1073 K, and heating rate (rh): 200 K/h; heating pattern is shown in Figure 2.Figure4 shows the total flow rate VTotal (above) and mole fraction (below) of the carbonisation gas for Muswellbrook coal as a function of carbonisation time t. At t = 240 min, the carbonisation temperature arrived at Tc,max = 1073 K and was maintained at Tc,max until 360 min had elapsed. After 240 min, the total flow rate decreased gradually. Around the carbonisation time of 0–120 min and 300–360 min, the total flow rate was relatively low; in these cases, the accuracy of the mole fraction would not be high. However, the overall picture of the gas composition can be seen easily. Hydrogen evolved at rather higher temperatures. Methane evolved from relatively lower carbonisation temperatures and continued across the temperature range. Higher hydrocarbons emitted within a lower temperature range. Both CO and CO2 evolved at rather constant rates all over the carbonisation time. This fact introduced the concept of the use of semichar in a carbon composite pellet and will be discussed later (Figures 5 and 6).Figure 5
Two-step heat pattern of carbonisation (heating raterh = 200 K/h).Figure 6
Emitted carbonisation gas volume and residual gas volume as a function ofTc,max (Newcastle blend coal, rh = 200 K/h).In the second step, carbonisation gas was used to prereduce iron oxide pellets (Figures3 and 7) for the iron bath smelting reduction process. The resultant char was evaluated as a reducing agent and a heat source for iron bath by simulation (calculation only); optimum amount of coal in the total iron bath smelting reduction process including the proposed prereduction stage was estimated and compared with the amount of coking coal required for a conventional blast furnace route. The proposed route was shown to be marginally better than the conventional blast furnace route in terms of coal consumption rate [9].Figure 7
Variations of final fractional reductionsF and FH with reduction temperature TR [7]. Experimental conditions: carbonisation of Muswellbrook coal (1 kg), Tc,max = 1273 K, rh = 200 K/h (Figure 2), carrier gas: N2 1.0 L/min (s.t.p.), secondary heater: off (Figure 3), and reduction of Nibrasco pellets (2 kg).Figure3 shows schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus for the prereduction of iron oxide pellets by coal carbonisation gas. The carbonisation reactor is the same as shown in Figure 1. Fractional reduction was evaluated from the loss in weight of the packed pellets. Fractional reduction by H was also evaluated by the condensed water vapour. The secondary heater can be used for heating the tar to produce the secondary carbonisation gas.Figure7 shows the final fractional reduction calculated by the gravimetric method, F, and by the final fractional reduction due to H, FH, as a function of reduction temperature TR, where H originated in hydrogen gas and hydrocarbons and was measured as condensed water vapour from the exhaust gas after reduction. Both F and FH tend to increase linearly between TR = 673 K and 1073 K, and increase more than the extrapolated lines for TR > 1073 K, which suggests the contribution of hydrocarbons to reduction reaction at higher reduction temperatures, maybe by the catalytic effect of reducing iron oxides or reduced iron. The ratio of FH to F can be seen about 0.5, which means very large contribution of H from hydrogen gas and hydrocarbons. The ultimate analysis is shown in Table 1. In Table 1, the values are written in mass% and mass% H is not so large, but mol% is important in chemical reactions and 4.93 mass% is large enough from this viewpoint.


## 3. Experimental Procedure

Carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semichar [10–12] were proposed from the measured results of the coal carbonisation gas release behaviour shown in the above section. Newlands coal, Newcastle blend coal, and Muswellbrook coal were used as samples of coal. Japanese cedar and Japanese cypress were used as samples of woody biomass. The analyses of the samples demonstrate that the woody biomass has much more VM and O and much less FC, ash, and S than the coals (Table 1). The carbonisation was done under a rising temperature condition at the same heating rate until arriving at the maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max in order to release some VM (Figure 2). The experiment was carried out by placing chips of the sample in the carbonisation reactor (Figure 1). Partly because some of the experimental items are the same as in Section 2 and partly because the present work covers many experimental items, the present experimental details are written in Section 4.


## 4. Results and Discussion

### 4.1. Heating Rate of Carbonisation

In the case of Muswellbrook coal, two heating rates (rh), 100 and 200 K/h, were used as shown in Figure 8; only carbonisation condition 4 (Case 4) was the lower heating rate of 100 K/h, applied to the Muswellbrook coal. This was applied to examine the effect of heating rate. When Case 4 in Figure 8 was applied, a little more total carbonisation gas was released, as shown in Table 2. However, the difference between total carbonisation gases of Cases 3 and 4 was only 3.4%, and therefore, it is assumed that the sample obtained by Case 3 in Figure 8 released all the volatile matter. It is also assumed that the sample carbonised at Tc,max = 1273 K under the heating rate of 200 K/h released all the volatile matter for every coal sample.Figure 8
Heat patterns of carbonisation for Muswellbrook coal.Table 2
Carbonisation gas from Muswellbrook coal.
[m3/kg (s.t.p.)]
Case (Figure8)
1
2
3
4
r
h (K/h)
200
200
200
100
T
c,max (K)
873
1073
1273
1273
H2
0.0326
0.0936
0.1252
0.1327
CO
0.0086
0.0212
0.0242
0.0232
CO2
0.0084
0.0102
0.0112
0.0092
CH4
0.0387
0.0515
0.0484
0.0516
C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8
0.0071
0.0071
0.0065
0.0066
Total
0.0955
0.1837
0.2155
0.2231


### 4.2. Carbon Composite Iron Oxide Pellets Using Semichar

#### 4.2.1. Two-Step Carbonisation Behaviour

It was inferred from the carbonisation experiments under rising temperature conditions (Figure4) that when the carbonisation was interrupted, the volatile matter release would also be interrupted, and that when the carbonisation under rising temperature conditions was started again, the release of the residual volatile matter would begin at the same interrupted carbonising temperature. This inference was demonstrated by the following two-step carbonisation. Figure 5 shows the schematic heat pattern for two steps: the first carbonisation at Tc,max (1) = 873 K and the second one at Tc,max (2) = 1273 K.Figures 9 through 13 in [10] show flow rates of the emitted gas components H2, CO, CO2, CH4, and (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) by two-step carbonisation of Newcastle blend coal at each maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max under the heating rate rh = 200 K/h. After the first carbonisation at Tc,max (1) = 873 K, when the carbonisation was started again (the second carbonisation at Tc,max (2) = 1273 K), the release of the residual volatile matter began at almost the same interrupted carbonising temperature Tc = 873 K. In Figure 9, cited from Figure 13 of [10], the total flow rate of (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) is negligibly small all over (t = 0–360 min) for the second carbonisation at Tc,max (2) = 1273 K, which can be easily understood from Figure 10, cited from Figure 7 of [10]; almost all the higher hydrocarbons (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) are released at Tc = 873 K.Figure 9
Variations of (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) flow rate with carbonisation time in the two-step carbonisation [10].Figure 10
Variations of (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) flow rate with carbonisation time in the one-step carbonisation [10].Moreover, from Figure 14 of [10], the total and individual carbonisation gas volumes for one-step (Tc,max = 1273 K) and two-step (Tc,max (1) = 873 K and Tc,max (2) = 1273 K) carbonisation were almost the same.From these findings, novel carbon composite pellets were proposed, in which the semichar including the residual volatile matter was used as the carbonaceous material. When fully carbonised char is used as the carbonaceous material, the reduction of carbon composite pellets initially occurs as a solid/solid reaction under rising temperature conditions as in a blast furnace.Whereas, when semichar is used as the carbonaceous material, the reduction of carbon composite pellets starts earlier as a gas/solid reaction just after the reduction temperatureTR arrives at Tc,max. In general, in the case of the semichar produced at lower maximum carbonisation temperature, Tc,max, the carbon composite pellets started the reduction reaction at the reduction temperature only a little higher than Tc,max under a rising temperature condition (see Figure 11 for semicharcoal composite pellets). The starting temperature of reduction and the quantity of residual volatile matter (VM) can be changed simultaneously (but not independently) by controlling Tc,max. Coal type could also be selected on the basis of VM content.Figure 11
Weight loss curves in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h) from Japanese cypress under the rising temperature condition at 10 K/min. Particle size range for the semicharcoal is 63–75 µm.Therefore, the first benefit is the decrease in the starting temperature of reaction, and the second one is the improved rate of reduction reaction by the residual volatile matter. The decrease in the starting temperature of reduction reaction of iron ore in a blast furnace leads to the decrease in consumption of reducing agents and hence, a productivity improvement.


#### 4.2.2. Reduction Behaviour of Carbon Composite Iron Oxide Pellets Using Semichar

Preparation of carbon composite iron oxide pellets was as follows:Mass ratio semichar: Fe2O3 = 1 : 4. Particle size: less than 63 μm.Binder: bentonite (1 mass% added). Pellet size: about 15 mm.Drying at 378 K for 24 h to remove water.Reagent grade hematite (95 mass% Fe2O3, particle size: less than 44 μm) was used for iron oxide. The chemical analysis of the bentonite is shown in Table 3, from which almost no effect of the bentonite is expected upon the reduction reaction because Fe2O3 content is as low as 3 mass% and the addition of the bentonite is 1 mass%. The semichar used was produced from Newcastle blend coal (Table 1). Newcastle blend coal was carbonised from room temperature to Tc,max = 823, 873, 973, 1073, or 1273 K at a heating rate of 200 K/h under the same heating time of 360 min, as shown in Figure 2. The obtained semichar was mixed with reagent grade hematite along with bentonite as a binder in order to strengthen. The semichar composite pellet was prepared by hand rolling.Table 3
Chemical analysis of the bentonite used.
mass%
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
K2O
Na2O
58.79
14.27
2.99
0.70
1.28
0.70
3.42Emitted and residual carbonisation gas volumes as a function ofTc,max are shown in Figure 6. As Tc,max increases, emitted gas volumes of H2 and CO increase and consequently residual gas volumes of H2 and CO decrease. The residual gas volume was calculated under the assumption that all the carbonisation gas components were emitted at Tc,max = 1273 K, as mentioned previously.Table4 shows the analyses of semichar carbonised from Newcastle blend coal at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K. As Tc,max increases, the residual volatile matter (VM) decreases clearly in Proximate analysis and H and O decrease gradually in Ultimate analysis, while FC in Proximate analysis and C in Ultimate analysis increase gradually.Table 4
Analyses of semichar carbonised from Newcastle blend coal atTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h).
mass%
T
c,max (K)
FC
VM
Ash
S
C
H
O
N
Initial
58.7
32.8
8.5
0.54
74.8
4.90
9.27
1.97
823
72.17
15.93
11.90
0.53
75.33
2.87
7.31
2.06
1073
82.70
4.43
12.87
0.42
81.52
1.54
1.91
1.74
1273
83.21
2.51
12.28
0.52
81.69
0.90
1.34
1.27Figure12 shows schematic view of experimental apparatus for reduction of carbon composite iron oxide pellets in Ar or N2 gas atmosphere. Constant flow rate of N2 was added to determine the flow rates of exhaust gas components [7]; the generated gases of H2, CO, CO2, CH4, (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8), and H2O along with N2 were analysed by the gas chromatography and the quadrupole mass spectrometry. Fractional reduction F (−) was calculated by(1)F=MO  in  reaction  gas−MO  in  volatile  matterRO,where MO in reaction gas is the total mole of oxygen in generated gases on iron oxide reduction (mol), MO in volatile matter is the total mole of oxygen in the released gas on carbonisation of carbonaceous materials (mol), and RO is the total mole of oxygen in case of reducing Fe2O3 as an iron oxide sample perfectly (mol) [13].Figure 12
Experimental apparatus for reduction of carbon composite pellets.Figure13 shows the comparison of reduction curves (fractional reduction F versus reduction time t) at reduction temperature TR = 1273 K in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semichar from Newcastle blend coal (Tc,max = 823 K and rh = 200 K/h), coke (VM = 0.6 mass%), and graphite (purity 98%). Particle size ranges for the semichar and coke are less than 63 μm and for the graphite less than 43 μm. The effect of the residual volatile matter in the semichar reductant can be easily seen with reduction occurring earlier and at a faster rate. The reduction rate of the graphite is much less than that of the coke, which can be explained by the degree of crystallization; the degree of crystallization of the graphite is higher than that of the coke (for another example, see Figure 14, which shows that the semichar has a crystalline structure but semicharcoal shows amorphous nature. In general, when the degree of crystallization is lower, the gasification rate is higher, and therefore, the reduction of carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal proceeds faster than that using semichar).Figure 13
Comparison of reduction curves for carbon composite pellets using semichar, coke, and graphite (TR = 1273 K).Figure 14
Comparison between the crystal structures of semichar (Newcastle blend coal) and semicharcoal (Japanese cypress) by XRD measurements. (a) Semichar. (b) Semicharcoal.
(a)
(b)


### 4.3. Carbon Composite Iron Oxide Pellets Using Semicharcoal

Semicharcoal [13–15] was also used to produce carbon composite pellets. The use of semicharcoal is aimed at not only because of carbon-neutral material but also because of high reactivity (reactivity = 1/Ea, Table 5).Table 5
Comparison of activation energies for various carbonaceous materials.
Carbonaceous material
Activation energyEa (kJ/mol)
Graphite
217 [16]
Bintyo char
182 [16]
Bamboo char
181 [16]
Coke
200 [16]
Glassy carbon
211 [16]
Activated carbon
149 [16]
Semicharcoal atTc,max = 823 K
138∗
Semicharcoal atTc,max = 1073 K
139∗
Semicharcoal atTc,max = 1273 K
162∗
Semichar atTc,max = 1073 K
174∗
Coke
219∗
∗Present work (by gasification experiments), where the semicharcoal was obtained from Japanese cypress and semichar from Newcastle blend coal (Table 1), and the analyses of the coke are shown in Table 6.


#### 4.3.1. Carbonisation Gases from Woods in Comparison with Those from Coals

Figure15 depicts total and individual components of carbonisation gases for Japanese cypress (200 g) as a function of the maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max, where the heating patterns are the same as in Figure 2. As Tc,max increases, H2 emission increases significantly, but the other components are relatively stable across the temperature range. The ratios of CO and CO2 are large, and those volumes are much the same with each other.Figure 15
Total and individual components of carbonisation gases for Japanese cypress as a function ofTc,max (rh = 200 K/h).Table6 shows the analyses of semicharcoal carbonised from Japanese cypress at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K with coke included for comparison. As Tc,max increases, the residual volatile matter (VM) decreases clearly in Proximate analysis and H and O also decrease clearly in Ultimate analysis, while FC and C increase gradually. The residual volatile matter value in the semicharcoal carbonised from Japanese cypress at Tc,max = 1273 K is relatively large and much larger than the one in the semichar carbonised from Newcastle blend coal at Tc,max = 1273 K (Table 4).Table 6
Analyses of semicharcoal carbonised from Japanese cypress atTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h) in comparison with coke.
mass%
T
c,max (K)
FC
VM
Ash
S
C
H
O
N
Japanese cypress
—
8.12
90.8
1.08
0.014
50.7
6.16
41.1
1.01
Semicharcoal
823
80.60
18.65
0.76
0.01
85.8
2.93
9.89
0.60
1073
89.35
9.64
1.01
0.03
91.2
1.33
5.89
0.55
1273
91.80
7.00
1.16
0.04
92.6
0.56
4.81
0.82
Coke
—
87.1
0.97
11.97
0.60
84.6
0.26
1.35
1.22Figure16 shows surface views of Japanese cypress carbonised at Tc,max = 823 and 1273 K by using an optical microscope. Semicharcoal has many micropores with the size of about 10 μm.Figure 16
Surface views of Japanese cypress carbonised atTc,max = 823 and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h); photos were taken by an optical microscope. (a) Tc,max = 823 K. (b) Tc,max = 1273 K.
(a)
(b)Figure17 illustrates comparisons of carbonisation gas volumes for all the analysed samples at Tc,max = 1073 and 1273 K and rh = 200 K/h. From Figure 17, it can be seen that coal and wood release almost similar total quantities of carbonisation gas. The first important point is the clear difference between the kinds of carbonisation gas components released from coals and woods. The second important point is large quantities of H2 and CH4 released from the samples of coal. This can be explained by the structure of the coal, which is composed of mainly carbon and hydrogen. The third important point is that wood releases great amount of CO and CO2 because of the large quantity of oxygen in its structure (Table 1). From Figure 6, it can be seen that the carbonisation gas will stay more within coal (or wood) especially in the residual VM, as the maximum carbonisation temperature decreases. Naturally, the total volume of carbonisation gas released at Tc,max = 1273 K is always higher than the one at Tc,max = 1073 K for all the samples used, which leads to results of the total amount of heat discussed later (Figure 18).Figure 17
Carbonisation gas volumes atTc,max = 1073 and 1273 K and rh = 200 K/h. (a) Tc,max = 1073 K. (b). Tc,max = 1273 K.
(a)
(b)Figure 18
Total amount of heat (kJ/kg) of each sample at the maximum carbonisation temperatureTc,max = 1073 and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h).Figure19 summarizes total carbonisation gas volumes as a function of Tc,max. On the whole, total carbonisation gas volumes for all the samples used increase monotonically with Tc,max.Figure 19
Total carbonisation gas volumes for all the samples used as a function of the maximum carbonisation temperature (rh = 200 K/h).


#### 4.3.2. Starting Point of Reduction of Semicharcoal Composite Pellet under Rising Temperature

Figure20 shows schematic view of experimental apparatus for measuring weight loss of a sample by a gravimetric method; in the upper box, a strain gauge-type transducer was equipped to measure the weight loss of the sample. The balance was used to counter the initial weight to be zero. Inside of the box was cooled by an N2 flow to keep the transducer at a constant temperature.Figure11 shows weight loss curves in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K from Japanese cypress under the rising temperature condition at 10 K/min (reduction temperature TR from room temperature till the maximum temperature TR,max = 1273 K). At Tc,max = 823 K, the weight loss started at TR = 833 K, which is only slightly higher than Tc,max.Figure 20
Experimental apparatus for measuring weight loss of a sample by the gravimetric method.


#### 4.3.3. Effect of Particle Size of Semicharcoal upon the Reduction Rate

In order to clarify the effect of particle size of semicharcoal upon the reduction rate of the composite pellets, variations of reduction curves at the reduction temperatureTR = 1073 and 1273 K in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 1073 K from Japanese cypress with the particle size are depicted in Figure 21.Figure 21
Influence of particle size of semicharcoal upon the reduction curves at the reduction temperatureTR = 1073 and 1273 K in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 1073 K and rh = 200 K/h from Japanese cypress. (a) TR = 1073 K. (b) TR = 1273 K.
(a)
(b)In this experiment, the apparatus used is the same as shown in Figure12 and fractional reduction F was calculated by (1).By using sieves, the particle size ranges were divided into the following three: 23–35, 63–75, and 105–150μm. In the case of Figure 21(a) at TR = 1073 K, the particle size dependence cannot be distinguished. In this case, the residual VM is unable to be released because TR = Tc,max. On the other hand, in the case of Figure 21(b) at TR = 1273 K, the residual VM is able to be released because TR > Tc,max, and moreover, the effect of particle size is very clear; the reduction rate of the composite pellet increases, as the particle size decreases, as a consequence of the specific surface area increasing.


#### 4.3.4. Comparison between Semichar and Semicharcoal

The rate enhancement effect of reduction for semicharcoal composite pellets is stronger than that for semichar composite pellets [15] because the gasification rate of semicharcoal is higher than that of semichar (Figures 22 and 23). This is caused by the following reasons: semicharcoal has an amorphous nature, while semichar has a more crystalline structure (Figure 14), and the activation energy of semicharcoal is lower than that of semichar (Table 5).Figure 22
Weight loss curves of semichar samples (Newcastle blend coal) obtained by carbonisation atTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1173 K and a coke sample (Table 6) at a gasification temperature TG = 1273 K in CO2 gas atmosphere.Figure 23
Weight loss curves of semicharcoal samples (Japanese cypress) obtained by carbonisation atTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K and a coke sample (Table 6) at TG = 1273 K in CO2 gas atmosphere.Figure 14 in [15] shows the comparison between the reduction curves of carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal (Japanese cypress) and semichar (Newcastle blend coal) carbonised at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K and rh = 200 K/h at reduction temperature TR = 1273 K in an N2 gas atmosphere. The reduction of carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal (Japanese cypress) proceeded faster than that using semichar (Newcastle blend coal).Figure22 shows weight loss curves of semichar from Newcastle blend coal obtained by carbonisation at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1173 K and a coke sample (Table 6) at a gasification temperature TG = 1273 K in CO2 gas atmosphere. The experimental apparatus for measuring the weight loss due to gasification of carbonaceous materials by a gravimetric method is the same as shown in Figure 20. Figure 23 shows weight loss curves of semicharcoal made from Japanese cypress obtained by carbonisation at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K and a coke sample at TG = 1273 K in CO2 gas atmosphere. From comparison of these figures, it can be concluded that the gasification rate of semicharcoal is higher than that of semichar.In Figure14, XRD measurements are shown; Semicharcoal has an amorphous nature, while semichar has a more crystalline structure. As shown in Figure 16, semicharcoal is very porous. From these facts, semicharcoal can be expected to be very reactive.Figure24 shows Arrhenius plots of the reaction rate of gasification for semichar and semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 1073 K as well as for coke, which are the same as in Figures 22 and 23. The reaction rate r (1/s) is given by(2)r=dXdt,where t = reaction time (s) and X = (W0 − Wt)/W0, in which W0 is the initial mass (g) and Wt is the mass at reaction time t (g). The gradient for semicharcoal is the smallest, and hence, its activation energy is the lowest. Table 5 shows comparison of activation energies for various carbonaceous materials from Kawakami et al. [16] and the data derived from this study. The most active one (the lowest activation energy) in this table is “semicharcoal at Tc,max = 823 K.” The activation energy for “semicharcoal at Tc,max = 1073 K” is lower than that for “semichar at Tc,max = 1073 K,” which means that semicharcoal is more reactive than semichar.Figure 24
Arrhenius plots of the reaction rate of gasification for semichar and semicharcoal produced atTc,max = 1073 K as well as for coke, which are the same as in Figures 22 and 23. The reaction rate r (1/s) is defined by (2) and TG: gasification temperature (K).


### 4.4. Heat Value of Carbonisation Gas

In order to evaluate the thermal potential of the gas components, the amount of heat (kJ/kg) has been calculated as for Newcastle blend coal in Table7. As Tc,max increases, the amounts of heat of H2 and CO also increase. The amounts of heat of CH4 within the temperature range of Tc,max = 823 to 973 K are much the same within some experimental error, but those from Tc,max = 973 to 1273 K increase monotonically. With regard to higher hydrocarbons, almost all these carbonisation gases (C2H4, C2H6, and C3H8) are evolved before the carbonisation temperature reaches at a little above 823 K, and therefore, the amounts of heat values for C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8 have no dependence upon the maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max over the Tc,max range from 823 to 1273 K but are scattered randomly. These tendencies can be easily understood by observing each gas emission behaviour at each Tc,max for Newcastle blend coal (see Figures 3 to 7 in [10]; Figure 7 in [10] is shown in this paper as Figure 10) or mole fraction variation for Muswellbrook coal (Figure 4). As a whole, the total heat values tend to increase almost monotonically, as Tc,max increases.Table 7
Amount of heat (kJ/kg) of each gas component as a function of maximum carbonisation temperatureTc,max (Newcastle blend coal, rh = 200 K/h).
T
c,max (K)
823
873
973
1073
1273
H2
24
453
555
1010
1648
CO
64
109
163
267
254
CH4
1384
1079
1145
1842
2206
C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8
688
725
320
509
725
Total
2160
2366
2183
3628
4833Figure18 shows the comparison among the total amounts of heat for all the samples used at Tc,max = 1073 and 1273 K. Amounts of heat for coal are somewhat higher than those for wood. The total amount of heat at Tc,max = 1273 K is always higher than the one at Tc,max = 1073 K for all the samples used.


### 4.5. Reactivity of Semicharcoal and the Total Carbonisation Gas Volume

Figure25 shows the reactivity of semicharcoal and the total carbonisation gas volume for Japanese cypress as a function of the maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max. The reactivity was calculated by the reciprocal of the activation energy Ea (kJ/mol) (Table 5). Because the scales of both ordinates are arbitrary, the optimum point cannot be considered absolute. However, we can envisage that there will be an optimum point for both high reactivity of semicharcoal and large volume of the emitted carbonisation gas, or biogas. Such an optimum point should be determined in consideration of the usage of the semicharcoal and carbonisation gas.Figure 25
Reactivity of semicharcoal and total carbonisation gas volume as a function of the maximum carbonisation temperatureTc,max (rh = 200 K/h) for Japanese cypress (sample weight in wood stage: 200 g).


## 4.1. Heating Rate of Carbonisation

In the case of Muswellbrook coal, two heating rates (rh), 100 and 200 K/h, were used as shown in Figure 8; only carbonisation condition 4 (Case 4) was the lower heating rate of 100 K/h, applied to the Muswellbrook coal. This was applied to examine the effect of heating rate. When Case 4 in Figure 8 was applied, a little more total carbonisation gas was released, as shown in Table 2. However, the difference between total carbonisation gases of Cases 3 and 4 was only 3.4%, and therefore, it is assumed that the sample obtained by Case 3 in Figure 8 released all the volatile matter. It is also assumed that the sample carbonised at Tc,max = 1273 K under the heating rate of 200 K/h released all the volatile matter for every coal sample.Figure 8
Heat patterns of carbonisation for Muswellbrook coal.Table 2
Carbonisation gas from Muswellbrook coal.
[m3/kg (s.t.p.)]
Case (Figure8)
1
2
3
4
r
h (K/h)
200
200
200
100
T
c,max (K)
873
1073
1273
1273
H2
0.0326
0.0936
0.1252
0.1327
CO
0.0086
0.0212
0.0242
0.0232
CO2
0.0084
0.0102
0.0112
0.0092
CH4
0.0387
0.0515
0.0484
0.0516
C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8
0.0071
0.0071
0.0065
0.0066
Total
0.0955
0.1837
0.2155
0.2231


## 4.2. Carbon Composite Iron Oxide Pellets Using Semichar

### 4.2.1. Two-Step Carbonisation Behaviour

It was inferred from the carbonisation experiments under rising temperature conditions (Figure4) that when the carbonisation was interrupted, the volatile matter release would also be interrupted, and that when the carbonisation under rising temperature conditions was started again, the release of the residual volatile matter would begin at the same interrupted carbonising temperature. This inference was demonstrated by the following two-step carbonisation. Figure 5 shows the schematic heat pattern for two steps: the first carbonisation at Tc,max (1) = 873 K and the second one at Tc,max (2) = 1273 K.Figures 9 through 13 in [10] show flow rates of the emitted gas components H2, CO, CO2, CH4, and (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) by two-step carbonisation of Newcastle blend coal at each maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max under the heating rate rh = 200 K/h. After the first carbonisation at Tc,max (1) = 873 K, when the carbonisation was started again (the second carbonisation at Tc,max (2) = 1273 K), the release of the residual volatile matter began at almost the same interrupted carbonising temperature Tc = 873 K. In Figure 9, cited from Figure 13 of [10], the total flow rate of (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) is negligibly small all over (t = 0–360 min) for the second carbonisation at Tc,max (2) = 1273 K, which can be easily understood from Figure 10, cited from Figure 7 of [10]; almost all the higher hydrocarbons (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) are released at Tc = 873 K.Figure 9
Variations of (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) flow rate with carbonisation time in the two-step carbonisation [10].Figure 10
Variations of (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) flow rate with carbonisation time in the one-step carbonisation [10].Moreover, from Figure 14 of [10], the total and individual carbonisation gas volumes for one-step (Tc,max = 1273 K) and two-step (Tc,max (1) = 873 K and Tc,max (2) = 1273 K) carbonisation were almost the same.From these findings, novel carbon composite pellets were proposed, in which the semichar including the residual volatile matter was used as the carbonaceous material. When fully carbonised char is used as the carbonaceous material, the reduction of carbon composite pellets initially occurs as a solid/solid reaction under rising temperature conditions as in a blast furnace.Whereas, when semichar is used as the carbonaceous material, the reduction of carbon composite pellets starts earlier as a gas/solid reaction just after the reduction temperatureTR arrives at Tc,max. In general, in the case of the semichar produced at lower maximum carbonisation temperature, Tc,max, the carbon composite pellets started the reduction reaction at the reduction temperature only a little higher than Tc,max under a rising temperature condition (see Figure 11 for semicharcoal composite pellets). The starting temperature of reduction and the quantity of residual volatile matter (VM) can be changed simultaneously (but not independently) by controlling Tc,max. Coal type could also be selected on the basis of VM content.Figure 11
Weight loss curves in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h) from Japanese cypress under the rising temperature condition at 10 K/min. Particle size range for the semicharcoal is 63–75 µm.Therefore, the first benefit is the decrease in the starting temperature of reaction, and the second one is the improved rate of reduction reaction by the residual volatile matter. The decrease in the starting temperature of reduction reaction of iron ore in a blast furnace leads to the decrease in consumption of reducing agents and hence, a productivity improvement.


### 4.2.2. Reduction Behaviour of Carbon Composite Iron Oxide Pellets Using Semichar

Preparation of carbon composite iron oxide pellets was as follows:Mass ratio semichar: Fe2O3 = 1 : 4. Particle size: less than 63 μm.Binder: bentonite (1 mass% added). Pellet size: about 15 mm.Drying at 378 K for 24 h to remove water.Reagent grade hematite (95 mass% Fe2O3, particle size: less than 44 μm) was used for iron oxide. The chemical analysis of the bentonite is shown in Table 3, from which almost no effect of the bentonite is expected upon the reduction reaction because Fe2O3 content is as low as 3 mass% and the addition of the bentonite is 1 mass%. The semichar used was produced from Newcastle blend coal (Table 1). Newcastle blend coal was carbonised from room temperature to Tc,max = 823, 873, 973, 1073, or 1273 K at a heating rate of 200 K/h under the same heating time of 360 min, as shown in Figure 2. The obtained semichar was mixed with reagent grade hematite along with bentonite as a binder in order to strengthen. The semichar composite pellet was prepared by hand rolling.Table 3
Chemical analysis of the bentonite used.
mass%
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
K2O
Na2O
58.79
14.27
2.99
0.70
1.28
0.70
3.42Emitted and residual carbonisation gas volumes as a function ofTc,max are shown in Figure 6. As Tc,max increases, emitted gas volumes of H2 and CO increase and consequently residual gas volumes of H2 and CO decrease. The residual gas volume was calculated under the assumption that all the carbonisation gas components were emitted at Tc,max = 1273 K, as mentioned previously.Table4 shows the analyses of semichar carbonised from Newcastle blend coal at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K. As Tc,max increases, the residual volatile matter (VM) decreases clearly in Proximate analysis and H and O decrease gradually in Ultimate analysis, while FC in Proximate analysis and C in Ultimate analysis increase gradually.Table 4
Analyses of semichar carbonised from Newcastle blend coal atTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h).
mass%
T
c,max (K)
FC
VM
Ash
S
C
H
O
N
Initial
58.7
32.8
8.5
0.54
74.8
4.90
9.27
1.97
823
72.17
15.93
11.90
0.53
75.33
2.87
7.31
2.06
1073
82.70
4.43
12.87
0.42
81.52
1.54
1.91
1.74
1273
83.21
2.51
12.28
0.52
81.69
0.90
1.34
1.27Figure12 shows schematic view of experimental apparatus for reduction of carbon composite iron oxide pellets in Ar or N2 gas atmosphere. Constant flow rate of N2 was added to determine the flow rates of exhaust gas components [7]; the generated gases of H2, CO, CO2, CH4, (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8), and H2O along with N2 were analysed by the gas chromatography and the quadrupole mass spectrometry. Fractional reduction F (−) was calculated by(1)F=MO  in  reaction  gas−MO  in  volatile  matterRO,where MO in reaction gas is the total mole of oxygen in generated gases on iron oxide reduction (mol), MO in volatile matter is the total mole of oxygen in the released gas on carbonisation of carbonaceous materials (mol), and RO is the total mole of oxygen in case of reducing Fe2O3 as an iron oxide sample perfectly (mol) [13].Figure 12
Experimental apparatus for reduction of carbon composite pellets.Figure13 shows the comparison of reduction curves (fractional reduction F versus reduction time t) at reduction temperature TR = 1273 K in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semichar from Newcastle blend coal (Tc,max = 823 K and rh = 200 K/h), coke (VM = 0.6 mass%), and graphite (purity 98%). Particle size ranges for the semichar and coke are less than 63 μm and for the graphite less than 43 μm. The effect of the residual volatile matter in the semichar reductant can be easily seen with reduction occurring earlier and at a faster rate. The reduction rate of the graphite is much less than that of the coke, which can be explained by the degree of crystallization; the degree of crystallization of the graphite is higher than that of the coke (for another example, see Figure 14, which shows that the semichar has a crystalline structure but semicharcoal shows amorphous nature. In general, when the degree of crystallization is lower, the gasification rate is higher, and therefore, the reduction of carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal proceeds faster than that using semichar).Figure 13
Comparison of reduction curves for carbon composite pellets using semichar, coke, and graphite (TR = 1273 K).Figure 14
Comparison between the crystal structures of semichar (Newcastle blend coal) and semicharcoal (Japanese cypress) by XRD measurements. (a) Semichar. (b) Semicharcoal.
(a)
(b)


## 4.2.1. Two-Step Carbonisation Behaviour

It was inferred from the carbonisation experiments under rising temperature conditions (Figure4) that when the carbonisation was interrupted, the volatile matter release would also be interrupted, and that when the carbonisation under rising temperature conditions was started again, the release of the residual volatile matter would begin at the same interrupted carbonising temperature. This inference was demonstrated by the following two-step carbonisation. Figure 5 shows the schematic heat pattern for two steps: the first carbonisation at Tc,max (1) = 873 K and the second one at Tc,max (2) = 1273 K.Figures 9 through 13 in [10] show flow rates of the emitted gas components H2, CO, CO2, CH4, and (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) by two-step carbonisation of Newcastle blend coal at each maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max under the heating rate rh = 200 K/h. After the first carbonisation at Tc,max (1) = 873 K, when the carbonisation was started again (the second carbonisation at Tc,max (2) = 1273 K), the release of the residual volatile matter began at almost the same interrupted carbonising temperature Tc = 873 K. In Figure 9, cited from Figure 13 of [10], the total flow rate of (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) is negligibly small all over (t = 0–360 min) for the second carbonisation at Tc,max (2) = 1273 K, which can be easily understood from Figure 10, cited from Figure 7 of [10]; almost all the higher hydrocarbons (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) are released at Tc = 873 K.Figure 9
Variations of (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) flow rate with carbonisation time in the two-step carbonisation [10].Figure 10
Variations of (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8) flow rate with carbonisation time in the one-step carbonisation [10].Moreover, from Figure 14 of [10], the total and individual carbonisation gas volumes for one-step (Tc,max = 1273 K) and two-step (Tc,max (1) = 873 K and Tc,max (2) = 1273 K) carbonisation were almost the same.From these findings, novel carbon composite pellets were proposed, in which the semichar including the residual volatile matter was used as the carbonaceous material. When fully carbonised char is used as the carbonaceous material, the reduction of carbon composite pellets initially occurs as a solid/solid reaction under rising temperature conditions as in a blast furnace.Whereas, when semichar is used as the carbonaceous material, the reduction of carbon composite pellets starts earlier as a gas/solid reaction just after the reduction temperatureTR arrives at Tc,max. In general, in the case of the semichar produced at lower maximum carbonisation temperature, Tc,max, the carbon composite pellets started the reduction reaction at the reduction temperature only a little higher than Tc,max under a rising temperature condition (see Figure 11 for semicharcoal composite pellets). The starting temperature of reduction and the quantity of residual volatile matter (VM) can be changed simultaneously (but not independently) by controlling Tc,max. Coal type could also be selected on the basis of VM content.Figure 11
Weight loss curves in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h) from Japanese cypress under the rising temperature condition at 10 K/min. Particle size range for the semicharcoal is 63–75 µm.Therefore, the first benefit is the decrease in the starting temperature of reaction, and the second one is the improved rate of reduction reaction by the residual volatile matter. The decrease in the starting temperature of reduction reaction of iron ore in a blast furnace leads to the decrease in consumption of reducing agents and hence, a productivity improvement.


## 4.2.2. Reduction Behaviour of Carbon Composite Iron Oxide Pellets Using Semichar

Preparation of carbon composite iron oxide pellets was as follows:Mass ratio semichar: Fe2O3 = 1 : 4. Particle size: less than 63 μm.Binder: bentonite (1 mass% added). Pellet size: about 15 mm.Drying at 378 K for 24 h to remove water.Reagent grade hematite (95 mass% Fe2O3, particle size: less than 44 μm) was used for iron oxide. The chemical analysis of the bentonite is shown in Table 3, from which almost no effect of the bentonite is expected upon the reduction reaction because Fe2O3 content is as low as 3 mass% and the addition of the bentonite is 1 mass%. The semichar used was produced from Newcastle blend coal (Table 1). Newcastle blend coal was carbonised from room temperature to Tc,max = 823, 873, 973, 1073, or 1273 K at a heating rate of 200 K/h under the same heating time of 360 min, as shown in Figure 2. The obtained semichar was mixed with reagent grade hematite along with bentonite as a binder in order to strengthen. The semichar composite pellet was prepared by hand rolling.Table 3
Chemical analysis of the bentonite used.
mass%
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
K2O
Na2O
58.79
14.27
2.99
0.70
1.28
0.70
3.42Emitted and residual carbonisation gas volumes as a function ofTc,max are shown in Figure 6. As Tc,max increases, emitted gas volumes of H2 and CO increase and consequently residual gas volumes of H2 and CO decrease. The residual gas volume was calculated under the assumption that all the carbonisation gas components were emitted at Tc,max = 1273 K, as mentioned previously.Table4 shows the analyses of semichar carbonised from Newcastle blend coal at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K. As Tc,max increases, the residual volatile matter (VM) decreases clearly in Proximate analysis and H and O decrease gradually in Ultimate analysis, while FC in Proximate analysis and C in Ultimate analysis increase gradually.Table 4
Analyses of semichar carbonised from Newcastle blend coal atTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h).
mass%
T
c,max (K)
FC
VM
Ash
S
C
H
O
N
Initial
58.7
32.8
8.5
0.54
74.8
4.90
9.27
1.97
823
72.17
15.93
11.90
0.53
75.33
2.87
7.31
2.06
1073
82.70
4.43
12.87
0.42
81.52
1.54
1.91
1.74
1273
83.21
2.51
12.28
0.52
81.69
0.90
1.34
1.27Figure12 shows schematic view of experimental apparatus for reduction of carbon composite iron oxide pellets in Ar or N2 gas atmosphere. Constant flow rate of N2 was added to determine the flow rates of exhaust gas components [7]; the generated gases of H2, CO, CO2, CH4, (C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8), and H2O along with N2 were analysed by the gas chromatography and the quadrupole mass spectrometry. Fractional reduction F (−) was calculated by(1)F=MO  in  reaction  gas−MO  in  volatile  matterRO,where MO in reaction gas is the total mole of oxygen in generated gases on iron oxide reduction (mol), MO in volatile matter is the total mole of oxygen in the released gas on carbonisation of carbonaceous materials (mol), and RO is the total mole of oxygen in case of reducing Fe2O3 as an iron oxide sample perfectly (mol) [13].Figure 12
Experimental apparatus for reduction of carbon composite pellets.Figure13 shows the comparison of reduction curves (fractional reduction F versus reduction time t) at reduction temperature TR = 1273 K in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semichar from Newcastle blend coal (Tc,max = 823 K and rh = 200 K/h), coke (VM = 0.6 mass%), and graphite (purity 98%). Particle size ranges for the semichar and coke are less than 63 μm and for the graphite less than 43 μm. The effect of the residual volatile matter in the semichar reductant can be easily seen with reduction occurring earlier and at a faster rate. The reduction rate of the graphite is much less than that of the coke, which can be explained by the degree of crystallization; the degree of crystallization of the graphite is higher than that of the coke (for another example, see Figure 14, which shows that the semichar has a crystalline structure but semicharcoal shows amorphous nature. In general, when the degree of crystallization is lower, the gasification rate is higher, and therefore, the reduction of carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal proceeds faster than that using semichar).Figure 13
Comparison of reduction curves for carbon composite pellets using semichar, coke, and graphite (TR = 1273 K).Figure 14
Comparison between the crystal structures of semichar (Newcastle blend coal) and semicharcoal (Japanese cypress) by XRD measurements. (a) Semichar. (b) Semicharcoal.
(a)
(b)


## 4.3. Carbon Composite Iron Oxide Pellets Using Semicharcoal

Semicharcoal [13–15] was also used to produce carbon composite pellets. The use of semicharcoal is aimed at not only because of carbon-neutral material but also because of high reactivity (reactivity = 1/Ea, Table 5).Table 5
Comparison of activation energies for various carbonaceous materials.
Carbonaceous material
Activation energyEa (kJ/mol)
Graphite
217 [16]
Bintyo char
182 [16]
Bamboo char
181 [16]
Coke
200 [16]
Glassy carbon
211 [16]
Activated carbon
149 [16]
Semicharcoal atTc,max = 823 K
138∗
Semicharcoal atTc,max = 1073 K
139∗
Semicharcoal atTc,max = 1273 K
162∗
Semichar atTc,max = 1073 K
174∗
Coke
219∗
∗Present work (by gasification experiments), where the semicharcoal was obtained from Japanese cypress and semichar from Newcastle blend coal (Table 1), and the analyses of the coke are shown in Table 6.


### 4.3.1. Carbonisation Gases from Woods in Comparison with Those from Coals

Figure15 depicts total and individual components of carbonisation gases for Japanese cypress (200 g) as a function of the maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max, where the heating patterns are the same as in Figure 2. As Tc,max increases, H2 emission increases significantly, but the other components are relatively stable across the temperature range. The ratios of CO and CO2 are large, and those volumes are much the same with each other.Figure 15
Total and individual components of carbonisation gases for Japanese cypress as a function ofTc,max (rh = 200 K/h).Table6 shows the analyses of semicharcoal carbonised from Japanese cypress at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K with coke included for comparison. As Tc,max increases, the residual volatile matter (VM) decreases clearly in Proximate analysis and H and O also decrease clearly in Ultimate analysis, while FC and C increase gradually. The residual volatile matter value in the semicharcoal carbonised from Japanese cypress at Tc,max = 1273 K is relatively large and much larger than the one in the semichar carbonised from Newcastle blend coal at Tc,max = 1273 K (Table 4).Table 6
Analyses of semicharcoal carbonised from Japanese cypress atTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h) in comparison with coke.
mass%
T
c,max (K)
FC
VM
Ash
S
C
H
O
N
Japanese cypress
—
8.12
90.8
1.08
0.014
50.7
6.16
41.1
1.01
Semicharcoal
823
80.60
18.65
0.76
0.01
85.8
2.93
9.89
0.60
1073
89.35
9.64
1.01
0.03
91.2
1.33
5.89
0.55
1273
91.80
7.00
1.16
0.04
92.6
0.56
4.81
0.82
Coke
—
87.1
0.97
11.97
0.60
84.6
0.26
1.35
1.22Figure16 shows surface views of Japanese cypress carbonised at Tc,max = 823 and 1273 K by using an optical microscope. Semicharcoal has many micropores with the size of about 10 μm.Figure 16
Surface views of Japanese cypress carbonised atTc,max = 823 and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h); photos were taken by an optical microscope. (a) Tc,max = 823 K. (b) Tc,max = 1273 K.
(a)
(b)Figure17 illustrates comparisons of carbonisation gas volumes for all the analysed samples at Tc,max = 1073 and 1273 K and rh = 200 K/h. From Figure 17, it can be seen that coal and wood release almost similar total quantities of carbonisation gas. The first important point is the clear difference between the kinds of carbonisation gas components released from coals and woods. The second important point is large quantities of H2 and CH4 released from the samples of coal. This can be explained by the structure of the coal, which is composed of mainly carbon and hydrogen. The third important point is that wood releases great amount of CO and CO2 because of the large quantity of oxygen in its structure (Table 1). From Figure 6, it can be seen that the carbonisation gas will stay more within coal (or wood) especially in the residual VM, as the maximum carbonisation temperature decreases. Naturally, the total volume of carbonisation gas released at Tc,max = 1273 K is always higher than the one at Tc,max = 1073 K for all the samples used, which leads to results of the total amount of heat discussed later (Figure 18).Figure 17
Carbonisation gas volumes atTc,max = 1073 and 1273 K and rh = 200 K/h. (a) Tc,max = 1073 K. (b). Tc,max = 1273 K.
(a)
(b)Figure 18
Total amount of heat (kJ/kg) of each sample at the maximum carbonisation temperatureTc,max = 1073 and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h).Figure19 summarizes total carbonisation gas volumes as a function of Tc,max. On the whole, total carbonisation gas volumes for all the samples used increase monotonically with Tc,max.Figure 19
Total carbonisation gas volumes for all the samples used as a function of the maximum carbonisation temperature (rh = 200 K/h).


### 4.3.2. Starting Point of Reduction of Semicharcoal Composite Pellet under Rising Temperature

Figure20 shows schematic view of experimental apparatus for measuring weight loss of a sample by a gravimetric method; in the upper box, a strain gauge-type transducer was equipped to measure the weight loss of the sample. The balance was used to counter the initial weight to be zero. Inside of the box was cooled by an N2 flow to keep the transducer at a constant temperature.Figure11 shows weight loss curves in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K from Japanese cypress under the rising temperature condition at 10 K/min (reduction temperature TR from room temperature till the maximum temperature TR,max = 1273 K). At Tc,max = 823 K, the weight loss started at TR = 833 K, which is only slightly higher than Tc,max.Figure 20
Experimental apparatus for measuring weight loss of a sample by the gravimetric method.


### 4.3.3. Effect of Particle Size of Semicharcoal upon the Reduction Rate

In order to clarify the effect of particle size of semicharcoal upon the reduction rate of the composite pellets, variations of reduction curves at the reduction temperatureTR = 1073 and 1273 K in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 1073 K from Japanese cypress with the particle size are depicted in Figure 21.Figure 21
Influence of particle size of semicharcoal upon the reduction curves at the reduction temperatureTR = 1073 and 1273 K in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 1073 K and rh = 200 K/h from Japanese cypress. (a) TR = 1073 K. (b) TR = 1273 K.
(a)
(b)In this experiment, the apparatus used is the same as shown in Figure12 and fractional reduction F was calculated by (1).By using sieves, the particle size ranges were divided into the following three: 23–35, 63–75, and 105–150μm. In the case of Figure 21(a) at TR = 1073 K, the particle size dependence cannot be distinguished. In this case, the residual VM is unable to be released because TR = Tc,max. On the other hand, in the case of Figure 21(b) at TR = 1273 K, the residual VM is able to be released because TR > Tc,max, and moreover, the effect of particle size is very clear; the reduction rate of the composite pellet increases, as the particle size decreases, as a consequence of the specific surface area increasing.


### 4.3.4. Comparison between Semichar and Semicharcoal

The rate enhancement effect of reduction for semicharcoal composite pellets is stronger than that for semichar composite pellets [15] because the gasification rate of semicharcoal is higher than that of semichar (Figures 22 and 23). This is caused by the following reasons: semicharcoal has an amorphous nature, while semichar has a more crystalline structure (Figure 14), and the activation energy of semicharcoal is lower than that of semichar (Table 5).Figure 22
Weight loss curves of semichar samples (Newcastle blend coal) obtained by carbonisation atTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1173 K and a coke sample (Table 6) at a gasification temperature TG = 1273 K in CO2 gas atmosphere.Figure 23
Weight loss curves of semicharcoal samples (Japanese cypress) obtained by carbonisation atTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K and a coke sample (Table 6) at TG = 1273 K in CO2 gas atmosphere.Figure 14 in [15] shows the comparison between the reduction curves of carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal (Japanese cypress) and semichar (Newcastle blend coal) carbonised at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K and rh = 200 K/h at reduction temperature TR = 1273 K in an N2 gas atmosphere. The reduction of carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal (Japanese cypress) proceeded faster than that using semichar (Newcastle blend coal).Figure22 shows weight loss curves of semichar from Newcastle blend coal obtained by carbonisation at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1173 K and a coke sample (Table 6) at a gasification temperature TG = 1273 K in CO2 gas atmosphere. The experimental apparatus for measuring the weight loss due to gasification of carbonaceous materials by a gravimetric method is the same as shown in Figure 20. Figure 23 shows weight loss curves of semicharcoal made from Japanese cypress obtained by carbonisation at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K and a coke sample at TG = 1273 K in CO2 gas atmosphere. From comparison of these figures, it can be concluded that the gasification rate of semicharcoal is higher than that of semichar.In Figure14, XRD measurements are shown; Semicharcoal has an amorphous nature, while semichar has a more crystalline structure. As shown in Figure 16, semicharcoal is very porous. From these facts, semicharcoal can be expected to be very reactive.Figure24 shows Arrhenius plots of the reaction rate of gasification for semichar and semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 1073 K as well as for coke, which are the same as in Figures 22 and 23. The reaction rate r (1/s) is given by(2)r=dXdt,where t = reaction time (s) and X = (W0 − Wt)/W0, in which W0 is the initial mass (g) and Wt is the mass at reaction time t (g). The gradient for semicharcoal is the smallest, and hence, its activation energy is the lowest. Table 5 shows comparison of activation energies for various carbonaceous materials from Kawakami et al. [16] and the data derived from this study. The most active one (the lowest activation energy) in this table is “semicharcoal at Tc,max = 823 K.” The activation energy for “semicharcoal at Tc,max = 1073 K” is lower than that for “semichar at Tc,max = 1073 K,” which means that semicharcoal is more reactive than semichar.Figure 24
Arrhenius plots of the reaction rate of gasification for semichar and semicharcoal produced atTc,max = 1073 K as well as for coke, which are the same as in Figures 22 and 23. The reaction rate r (1/s) is defined by (2) and TG: gasification temperature (K).


## 4.3.1. Carbonisation Gases from Woods in Comparison with Those from Coals

Figure15 depicts total and individual components of carbonisation gases for Japanese cypress (200 g) as a function of the maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max, where the heating patterns are the same as in Figure 2. As Tc,max increases, H2 emission increases significantly, but the other components are relatively stable across the temperature range. The ratios of CO and CO2 are large, and those volumes are much the same with each other.Figure 15
Total and individual components of carbonisation gases for Japanese cypress as a function ofTc,max (rh = 200 K/h).Table6 shows the analyses of semicharcoal carbonised from Japanese cypress at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K with coke included for comparison. As Tc,max increases, the residual volatile matter (VM) decreases clearly in Proximate analysis and H and O also decrease clearly in Ultimate analysis, while FC and C increase gradually. The residual volatile matter value in the semicharcoal carbonised from Japanese cypress at Tc,max = 1273 K is relatively large and much larger than the one in the semichar carbonised from Newcastle blend coal at Tc,max = 1273 K (Table 4).Table 6
Analyses of semicharcoal carbonised from Japanese cypress atTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h) in comparison with coke.
mass%
T
c,max (K)
FC
VM
Ash
S
C
H
O
N
Japanese cypress
—
8.12
90.8
1.08
0.014
50.7
6.16
41.1
1.01
Semicharcoal
823
80.60
18.65
0.76
0.01
85.8
2.93
9.89
0.60
1073
89.35
9.64
1.01
0.03
91.2
1.33
5.89
0.55
1273
91.80
7.00
1.16
0.04
92.6
0.56
4.81
0.82
Coke
—
87.1
0.97
11.97
0.60
84.6
0.26
1.35
1.22Figure16 shows surface views of Japanese cypress carbonised at Tc,max = 823 and 1273 K by using an optical microscope. Semicharcoal has many micropores with the size of about 10 μm.Figure 16
Surface views of Japanese cypress carbonised atTc,max = 823 and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h); photos were taken by an optical microscope. (a) Tc,max = 823 K. (b) Tc,max = 1273 K.
(a)
(b)Figure17 illustrates comparisons of carbonisation gas volumes for all the analysed samples at Tc,max = 1073 and 1273 K and rh = 200 K/h. From Figure 17, it can be seen that coal and wood release almost similar total quantities of carbonisation gas. The first important point is the clear difference between the kinds of carbonisation gas components released from coals and woods. The second important point is large quantities of H2 and CH4 released from the samples of coal. This can be explained by the structure of the coal, which is composed of mainly carbon and hydrogen. The third important point is that wood releases great amount of CO and CO2 because of the large quantity of oxygen in its structure (Table 1). From Figure 6, it can be seen that the carbonisation gas will stay more within coal (or wood) especially in the residual VM, as the maximum carbonisation temperature decreases. Naturally, the total volume of carbonisation gas released at Tc,max = 1273 K is always higher than the one at Tc,max = 1073 K for all the samples used, which leads to results of the total amount of heat discussed later (Figure 18).Figure 17
Carbonisation gas volumes atTc,max = 1073 and 1273 K and rh = 200 K/h. (a) Tc,max = 1073 K. (b). Tc,max = 1273 K.
(a)
(b)Figure 18
Total amount of heat (kJ/kg) of each sample at the maximum carbonisation temperatureTc,max = 1073 and 1273 K (rh = 200 K/h).Figure19 summarizes total carbonisation gas volumes as a function of Tc,max. On the whole, total carbonisation gas volumes for all the samples used increase monotonically with Tc,max.Figure 19
Total carbonisation gas volumes for all the samples used as a function of the maximum carbonisation temperature (rh = 200 K/h).


## 4.3.2. Starting Point of Reduction of Semicharcoal Composite Pellet under Rising Temperature

Figure20 shows schematic view of experimental apparatus for measuring weight loss of a sample by a gravimetric method; in the upper box, a strain gauge-type transducer was equipped to measure the weight loss of the sample. The balance was used to counter the initial weight to be zero. Inside of the box was cooled by an N2 flow to keep the transducer at a constant temperature.Figure11 shows weight loss curves in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K from Japanese cypress under the rising temperature condition at 10 K/min (reduction temperature TR from room temperature till the maximum temperature TR,max = 1273 K). At Tc,max = 823 K, the weight loss started at TR = 833 K, which is only slightly higher than Tc,max.Figure 20
Experimental apparatus for measuring weight loss of a sample by the gravimetric method.


## 4.3.3. Effect of Particle Size of Semicharcoal upon the Reduction Rate

In order to clarify the effect of particle size of semicharcoal upon the reduction rate of the composite pellets, variations of reduction curves at the reduction temperatureTR = 1073 and 1273 K in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 1073 K from Japanese cypress with the particle size are depicted in Figure 21.Figure 21
Influence of particle size of semicharcoal upon the reduction curves at the reduction temperatureTR = 1073 and 1273 K in N2 gas atmosphere for carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 1073 K and rh = 200 K/h from Japanese cypress. (a) TR = 1073 K. (b) TR = 1273 K.
(a)
(b)In this experiment, the apparatus used is the same as shown in Figure12 and fractional reduction F was calculated by (1).By using sieves, the particle size ranges were divided into the following three: 23–35, 63–75, and 105–150μm. In the case of Figure 21(a) at TR = 1073 K, the particle size dependence cannot be distinguished. In this case, the residual VM is unable to be released because TR = Tc,max. On the other hand, in the case of Figure 21(b) at TR = 1273 K, the residual VM is able to be released because TR > Tc,max, and moreover, the effect of particle size is very clear; the reduction rate of the composite pellet increases, as the particle size decreases, as a consequence of the specific surface area increasing.


## 4.3.4. Comparison between Semichar and Semicharcoal

The rate enhancement effect of reduction for semicharcoal composite pellets is stronger than that for semichar composite pellets [15] because the gasification rate of semicharcoal is higher than that of semichar (Figures 22 and 23). This is caused by the following reasons: semicharcoal has an amorphous nature, while semichar has a more crystalline structure (Figure 14), and the activation energy of semicharcoal is lower than that of semichar (Table 5).Figure 22
Weight loss curves of semichar samples (Newcastle blend coal) obtained by carbonisation atTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1173 K and a coke sample (Table 6) at a gasification temperature TG = 1273 K in CO2 gas atmosphere.Figure 23
Weight loss curves of semicharcoal samples (Japanese cypress) obtained by carbonisation atTc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K and a coke sample (Table 6) at TG = 1273 K in CO2 gas atmosphere.Figure 14 in [15] shows the comparison between the reduction curves of carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal (Japanese cypress) and semichar (Newcastle blend coal) carbonised at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K and rh = 200 K/h at reduction temperature TR = 1273 K in an N2 gas atmosphere. The reduction of carbon composite pellets using semicharcoal (Japanese cypress) proceeded faster than that using semichar (Newcastle blend coal).Figure22 shows weight loss curves of semichar from Newcastle blend coal obtained by carbonisation at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1173 K and a coke sample (Table 6) at a gasification temperature TG = 1273 K in CO2 gas atmosphere. The experimental apparatus for measuring the weight loss due to gasification of carbonaceous materials by a gravimetric method is the same as shown in Figure 20. Figure 23 shows weight loss curves of semicharcoal made from Japanese cypress obtained by carbonisation at Tc,max = 823, 1073, and 1273 K and a coke sample at TG = 1273 K in CO2 gas atmosphere. From comparison of these figures, it can be concluded that the gasification rate of semicharcoal is higher than that of semichar.In Figure14, XRD measurements are shown; Semicharcoal has an amorphous nature, while semichar has a more crystalline structure. As shown in Figure 16, semicharcoal is very porous. From these facts, semicharcoal can be expected to be very reactive.Figure24 shows Arrhenius plots of the reaction rate of gasification for semichar and semicharcoal produced at Tc,max = 1073 K as well as for coke, which are the same as in Figures 22 and 23. The reaction rate r (1/s) is given by(2)r=dXdt,where t = reaction time (s) and X = (W0 − Wt)/W0, in which W0 is the initial mass (g) and Wt is the mass at reaction time t (g). The gradient for semicharcoal is the smallest, and hence, its activation energy is the lowest. Table 5 shows comparison of activation energies for various carbonaceous materials from Kawakami et al. [16] and the data derived from this study. The most active one (the lowest activation energy) in this table is “semicharcoal at Tc,max = 823 K.” The activation energy for “semicharcoal at Tc,max = 1073 K” is lower than that for “semichar at Tc,max = 1073 K,” which means that semicharcoal is more reactive than semichar.Figure 24
Arrhenius plots of the reaction rate of gasification for semichar and semicharcoal produced atTc,max = 1073 K as well as for coke, which are the same as in Figures 22 and 23. The reaction rate r (1/s) is defined by (2) and TG: gasification temperature (K).


## 4.4. Heat Value of Carbonisation Gas

In order to evaluate the thermal potential of the gas components, the amount of heat (kJ/kg) has been calculated as for Newcastle blend coal in Table7. As Tc,max increases, the amounts of heat of H2 and CO also increase. The amounts of heat of CH4 within the temperature range of Tc,max = 823 to 973 K are much the same within some experimental error, but those from Tc,max = 973 to 1273 K increase monotonically. With regard to higher hydrocarbons, almost all these carbonisation gases (C2H4, C2H6, and C3H8) are evolved before the carbonisation temperature reaches at a little above 823 K, and therefore, the amounts of heat values for C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8 have no dependence upon the maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max over the Tc,max range from 823 to 1273 K but are scattered randomly. These tendencies can be easily understood by observing each gas emission behaviour at each Tc,max for Newcastle blend coal (see Figures 3 to 7 in [10]; Figure 7 in [10] is shown in this paper as Figure 10) or mole fraction variation for Muswellbrook coal (Figure 4). As a whole, the total heat values tend to increase almost monotonically, as Tc,max increases.Table 7
Amount of heat (kJ/kg) of each gas component as a function of maximum carbonisation temperatureTc,max (Newcastle blend coal, rh = 200 K/h).
T
c,max (K)
823
873
973
1073
1273
H2
24
453
555
1010
1648
CO
64
109
163
267
254
CH4
1384
1079
1145
1842
2206
C2H4 + C2H6 + C3H8
688
725
320
509
725
Total
2160
2366
2183
3628
4833Figure18 shows the comparison among the total amounts of heat for all the samples used at Tc,max = 1073 and 1273 K. Amounts of heat for coal are somewhat higher than those for wood. The total amount of heat at Tc,max = 1273 K is always higher than the one at Tc,max = 1073 K for all the samples used.


## 4.5. Reactivity of Semicharcoal and the Total Carbonisation Gas Volume

Figure25 shows the reactivity of semicharcoal and the total carbonisation gas volume for Japanese cypress as a function of the maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max. The reactivity was calculated by the reciprocal of the activation energy Ea (kJ/mol) (Table 5). Because the scales of both ordinates are arbitrary, the optimum point cannot be considered absolute. However, we can envisage that there will be an optimum point for both high reactivity of semicharcoal and large volume of the emitted carbonisation gas, or biogas. Such an optimum point should be determined in consideration of the usage of the semicharcoal and carbonisation gas.Figure 25
Reactivity of semicharcoal and total carbonisation gas volume as a function of the maximum carbonisation temperatureTc,max (rh = 200 K/h) for Japanese cypress (sample weight in wood stage: 200 g).


## 5. Conclusions

Carbon composite iron oxide pellets using semichar or semicharcoal were proposed from the measured results of the coal carbonisation gas release behaviour for prereduction of iron oxide, which was a part of the fundamental study for smelting reduction total process. The samples used were Newlands coal, Newcastle blend coal, Muswellbrook coal, Japanese cedar, and Japanese cypress to prepare semichar and semicharcoal as carbonaceous materials, and coke was also used for reference. The carbonisation was completed under rising temperature conditions at a constant heating rate (mainly at 200 K/h) until arriving at the maximum carbonisation temperatureTc,max in order to release some volatile matter (VM). Conclusions obtained are as follows:(1)
Comparison of reduction curves for carbon composite pellets using semichar produced atTc,max = 823 K and coke and graphite at the reduction temperature TR = 1273 K showed that the reduction rate of the semichar composite pellet was the highest and that of graphite was the lowest.(2)
From [14], the rate of reduction for semicharcoal composite pellets was greater than that for semichar composite pellets because the gasification rate of semicharcoal is higher than that of semichar for the following reasons: the amorphous nature of semicharcoal is stronger than that of semichar, and the activation energy of semicharcoal is lower than that of semichar.(3)
The starting point of reduction of the carbon composite pellet using semicharcoal produced atTc,max = 823 K in N2 gas atmosphere was observed to be at the reduction temperature TR = 833 K, only a little higher than Tc,max, which was the target of the experiment.(4)
For all the samples, the total carbonisation gas volume increases, as the maximum carbonisation temperatureTc,max increases. The heat value of the carbonisation gas depends on Tc,max and consequently the emitted gas volume and the composition. As a whole, the total heat value tends to increase almost monotonically, as Tc,max increases.(5)
Large quantities of H2 and CH4 are released from the sample coals. This can be explained from the structure of the coal, which is mainly composed of carbon and hydrogen. In contrast, large amounts of CO and CO2 are released from the sample woods because of the large quantity of oxygen in its structure.(6)
The effect of the particle size of the carbonaceous material on the reduction rate was studied by using semicharcoal composite pellets. WhenTR is higher than Tc,max, the reduction rate increases, as the particle size decreases. When TR is equal to Tc,max, there is almost no effect.(7)
The maximum carbonisation temperatureTc,max can be used to control the evolved and residual gas volumes. With decreasing Tc,max, the activation energy Ea of semicharcoal decreases, or the reactivity 1/Ea of semicharcoal increases. The maximum carbonisation temperature Tc,max may be optimised for reactivity of semicharcoal and the total carbonisation gas volume or the heat value.



---

*Source: 3807609-2018-03-11.xml*