# Design and Impedance Modeling of a Compact Sequentially Rotated Quasi-Lumped Antenna Array for Wi-Fi Applications

Authors: Yazeed M. I. Qasaymeh
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

In this study, a miniaturized 2 × 2 sequentially rotated (SR), circularly polarized (CP), and quasi-lumped antenna array that resonates in the IEEE 802.11a band is introduced. The shorting pins technique is implemented to achieve circular radiation patterns, and the resonating elements are excited using a SR quarter-wavelength feeding network. A resonance model of the four radiating elements array is postulated to give a physical insight into the relative dimensions and to allow for a study of the resonance characteristics and the effect of the shorting pins. An antenna model is simulated, fabricated, and measured to authenticate this arrangement, giving results of |S11| < −10 dB and axial ratio (AR) < 3 dB for bandwidths of 3.85% (5.645–5.867 GHz) and 1.54% (5.77–5.86 GHz) for right-hand circular polarization (RHCP). The size of the antenna array structure is0.696λ0×0.599λ0×0.0157λ0 at a center frequency of 5.8 GHz.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Shortly after their introduction in the 1970s, microstrip patch antennas attracted considerable attention due to their useful features, such as ease of analysis and fabrication, desirable radiation characteristics, low mass, cost efficiency, straightforward integration, minimal profile, mechanical robustness, and compatibility with MIMC designs [1, 2]. However, they were considered to be impractical for mobile communications, particularly, for installation in mobile handsets because of their large size. Thus, printed microwave quasi-lumped antennas appeared to be the most suitable contenders to replace classical patch antennas, as they were not subject to size limitations [3, 4].Single-element antennas are normally low-gain devices that need to be arrayed to achieve high gain performance. Several types of feed have been used in linear arrays to meet this requirement, including series [5] and parallel microstrip feeds [6]. In general, a series feed topology results in a more concise network that involves shorter transmission lengths, fewer junctions, and lower insertion losses compared to a parallel feed; however, it is subject to a narrow bandwidth and phase differences due to the differences in line lengths [7]. In contrast, a parallel-fed topology gives a wider bandwidth, as it does not produce high mismatch losses [8]. In addition, corporate and parallel feeds have the advantage that the excitation for such arrays has good design elasticity and ease of integration when two-dimensional arrays are created. The feed magnitude for each element can be easily controlled by employing either amplifiers or attenuators, and the phase can be controlled using phase shifters.Numerous single-feed CP microstrip antenna methods have been documented in the literature, such as a U-slot microstrip antenna [9], an equilateral triangular single-feed circularly polarized microstrip antenna [10], a CP annular-ring microstrip antenna developed using a pair of inserted slits [11], and a square-ring microstrip antenna with a truncated corner design [12]. Other designs have been based on the carving of a split ring resonator on a patch [13], etching of asymmetrical slots into a single probe-feed square microstrip [14], the use of an L-shaped microstrip connected to a tag-chip and terminated by a shorting pin coupled to a microstrip antenna [15], and the use of a circular eccentric ring to generate CP radiation [16]. The aforementioned methods aimed to achieve CP by altering the physical dimensions of the antenna.In this paper, a quasi-lumped resonator antenna array is presented with the aim of achieving size reduction and circular radiation performance. In conventional approaches, if the single element is small, the array is also small. In view of this, a corporate feed design for a quasi-lumped array antenna network will be implemented to reduce the footprint of the array configuration.The three major objectives of this study are (i) to provide an array equivalent impedance circuit used to give a frequency resonance preliminary indication, (ii) to generate CP radiation, and (iii) to design a miniaturized array structure with the smallest possible size. The antenna array equivalent circuit is built based on array feed and elements’ dimensions. CP is achieved using the technique of loading of shorting pins, while a quarter-wavelength transformer technique is used to feed the antenna array to improve the gain and reduce the overall array size.In Section2, the proposed antenna array excitation technique and feeding method are introduced. The impedance resonance model of the array is described in Section 3. A discussion and the experimental results from the proposed array are presented in Section 4.


## 2. Configuration of the Antenna Array

### 2.1. Quasi-Lumped Geometry

The components required for the approximate microwave operation of lumped elements in microstrip structures are microstrip shorts and stubs with dimensions shorter than a quarter wavelength at the resonating frequency. These are referred to as quasi-lumped. A primary benefit of this method is the simplicity of transition into an equivalent circuit, wherein capacitors and inductors constitute a microstrip structure. Figure1 shows the structure of a single quasi-lumped element resonator. The equivalent lumped elements of the single proposed antenna are shown in Figure 2. A winding-line inductor can be used to increase the capacitance. The inductor L is molded as a finger that is connected across the capacitor C. The pad capacitors CP1 and CP2 connected to both sides of the structure act as capacitors to the ground and can be adjusted in order to tune the resonant frequency of the proposed resonator. The details of the process of calculating the operating frequency of the proposed single quasi-lumped antenna and its dimensions are discussed in [17]. Table 1 presents the dimensions of a single quasi-lumped element at a resonant frequency of 5.8 GHz.Figure 1
Proposed quasi-lumped antenna: (a) dimensions used to calculate the lumped elements; (b) allocation of the lumped elements.
(a)(b)Figure 2
Equivalent circuit for the proposed antenna.Table 1
Parameters for the elements of the proposed quasi-lumped antenna.
ParameterDimensions (mm)We0.35IL3.35C3.05N8IL/1.23ge1.23WL1.2L5.4W5.8h0813


### 2.2. Shorting Pins

The use of shorting pins was first introduced in [18] to achieve CP radiation. If the shorting pins are situated near to the edges of a diagonal-fed patch, two resonant modes are excited, one of which is higher than the other, and hence, CP is achieved [19]. The polarization of microstrip antennas can be tuned by adjusting the positions of the shorting posts (pins) within the boundaries of the antenna. Inserting the shorting posts into the antenna patch changes the smallest point of minor frequency to a higher frequency, yielding a wide axial ratio band. Other techniques for slicing slots or adding tails are less beneficial in terms of size mitigation compared to the use of shorting pins, which is the most effective solution for the size miniaturization of patch antennas. The impact of the shorting pins depends on several parameters, such as the number and radii of the posts and the thickness of the microstrip antenna. The shorting pins are directly connected between the radiating element and the ground plane.


### 2.3. Feeding Topology

Single feeds forCP radiation operation can be categorized into two types: single port/single feed and single port/double feed. The single-port feed technique is easy to construct [20]. SR arrays were first proposed in [21] to improve the performance of CP arrays. Microstrip antenna arrays use SR to achieve improvements in polarization purity, impedance matching, and pattern symmetry across wider bandwidths [22, 23].In general, corporate feed networks are used to provide power splits of two-element numbers. The quarter-wavelength approach is a technique that is used to match the transmission line to the antenna using a transformer. The impedance characteristics of the transmission line are restricted in terms of the range and values; thus, the quarter-wavelength transformer technique is most suitable when microstrip transmission lines are used [24, 25].The proposed design is shown in Figure3. Our array consists of four radiating quasi-lumped elements fed by a 2 × 2 SR microstrip in the front layer and a ground plane in the bottom layer. The shorting pins are located at the center of the resonating elements. A quarter-wave impedance transformer of 70.7 Ω is used to convert a 100 Ω for each radiating element fed by a 50 Ω line, thus creating the conditions for impedance matching.Figure 3
Proposed SR quarter-wavelength quasi-lumped antenna array.


## 2.1. Quasi-Lumped Geometry

The components required for the approximate microwave operation of lumped elements in microstrip structures are microstrip shorts and stubs with dimensions shorter than a quarter wavelength at the resonating frequency. These are referred to as quasi-lumped. A primary benefit of this method is the simplicity of transition into an equivalent circuit, wherein capacitors and inductors constitute a microstrip structure. Figure1 shows the structure of a single quasi-lumped element resonator. The equivalent lumped elements of the single proposed antenna are shown in Figure 2. A winding-line inductor can be used to increase the capacitance. The inductor L is molded as a finger that is connected across the capacitor C. The pad capacitors CP1 and CP2 connected to both sides of the structure act as capacitors to the ground and can be adjusted in order to tune the resonant frequency of the proposed resonator. The details of the process of calculating the operating frequency of the proposed single quasi-lumped antenna and its dimensions are discussed in [17]. Table 1 presents the dimensions of a single quasi-lumped element at a resonant frequency of 5.8 GHz.Figure 1
Proposed quasi-lumped antenna: (a) dimensions used to calculate the lumped elements; (b) allocation of the lumped elements.
(a)(b)Figure 2
Equivalent circuit for the proposed antenna.Table 1
Parameters for the elements of the proposed quasi-lumped antenna.
ParameterDimensions (mm)We0.35IL3.35C3.05N8IL/1.23ge1.23WL1.2L5.4W5.8h0813


## 2.2. Shorting Pins

The use of shorting pins was first introduced in [18] to achieve CP radiation. If the shorting pins are situated near to the edges of a diagonal-fed patch, two resonant modes are excited, one of which is higher than the other, and hence, CP is achieved [19]. The polarization of microstrip antennas can be tuned by adjusting the positions of the shorting posts (pins) within the boundaries of the antenna. Inserting the shorting posts into the antenna patch changes the smallest point of minor frequency to a higher frequency, yielding a wide axial ratio band. Other techniques for slicing slots or adding tails are less beneficial in terms of size mitigation compared to the use of shorting pins, which is the most effective solution for the size miniaturization of patch antennas. The impact of the shorting pins depends on several parameters, such as the number and radii of the posts and the thickness of the microstrip antenna. The shorting pins are directly connected between the radiating element and the ground plane.


## 2.3. Feeding Topology

Single feeds forCP radiation operation can be categorized into two types: single port/single feed and single port/double feed. The single-port feed technique is easy to construct [20]. SR arrays were first proposed in [21] to improve the performance of CP arrays. Microstrip antenna arrays use SR to achieve improvements in polarization purity, impedance matching, and pattern symmetry across wider bandwidths [22, 23].In general, corporate feed networks are used to provide power splits of two-element numbers. The quarter-wavelength approach is a technique that is used to match the transmission line to the antenna using a transformer. The impedance characteristics of the transmission line are restricted in terms of the range and values; thus, the quarter-wavelength transformer technique is most suitable when microstrip transmission lines are used [24, 25].The proposed design is shown in Figure3. Our array consists of four radiating quasi-lumped elements fed by a 2 × 2 SR microstrip in the front layer and a ground plane in the bottom layer. The shorting pins are located at the center of the resonating elements. A quarter-wave impedance transformer of 70.7 Ω is used to convert a 100 Ω for each radiating element fed by a 50 Ω line, thus creating the conditions for impedance matching.Figure 3
Proposed SR quarter-wavelength quasi-lumped antenna array.


## 3. Array Equivalent Impedance Model

In this study, an equivalent impedance model is proposed in order to give a physical description of the resonance frequency of the array. This model is used to validate the simulated and measured resonance operations. The antenna array consists of a quarter-wavelength microstrip feed and resonating elements. The quarter-wave microstrip feed is developed by cascading three segments with characteristic impedance values of 50, 70.7, and 100 Ω, as shown in Figure3. The microstrip circuit consists of the equivalent radiation conductance Grm and the susceptance of the fringing field capacitance of the microstrip CL. The conductance Grm and capacitance are calculated using (1 and (2), respectively, as reported in [26]:(1)Grm=160π2h2Zcm2λ02εcm,where h is substrate height, Zcm is characteristic impedance of the microstrip, and εcm is effective dielectric constant.(2)Cl=leqCεcmZcm,where leq is equivalent extralength of microstrip and C is velocity of light.The quasi-lumped equivalent lumped elementsC, L, CP1, and CP2 are derived from equations (3–5), respectively. Table 2 presents the equivalent lumped elements for a single quasi-lumped element at 5.8 GHz obtained using the equations reported in [27–29]:(3)C=ε0εr+12N−ΔCL,(4)L=200×10−9ILln2ILWL+h+0.50049+WL3IL,(5)CP=2.85εeffln1+1/28h/εeff8h/εeff+8h/εeff2+π2×125.4×10−3,where h is substrate thickness, IL is inductor length, wL is inductor width, N is the number of fingers, and Δ is the correction factor between 0.44 and 0.65 for N = 1 and 2, respectively.Table 2
Equivalent lumped elements for the quasi-lumped resonator.
ValueParameterC0.347 PFCP10.17 PFCP20.17 PFL1.47 nHThe equivalent circuit for the shorting posts is represented in the form of shunt inductances in the locations at which the posts are connected to the ground. The inductive reactance of the posts and the feed probe are calculated from(6)XL=377εrtan2πhλ0.Figures4(a) and 4(b) show the equivalent circuits for a single quasi-lumped array element with a shorting post and with a single segment microstrip feed, respectively. The impedance of the microstrip feeder segments and the four radiating elements are connected to form the array equivalent resonant circuit, which is used to study the resonance behavior of the array.Figure 4
Equivalent circuits for (a) a single quasi-lumped element with a shorting pin at the center and (b) a microstrip feed.
(a)(b)


## 4. Results and Discussion

Figure5 shows the equivalent input impedance, modeled using Agilent Advanced Design System (ADS). The resistance and capacitance values representing the microstrip segment feeder and the four resonating quasi-lumped elements are given in Tables 2 and 3. The impedance model is used to predict the resonance behavior of the antenna array before modeling and fabrication. No radiation pattern is expected from this model.Figure 5
Equivalent impedance model for the antenna array, modeled in ADS.Table 3
Equivalent lumped elements for the microstrip feeder segments.
Grm (Ω)CLFCharacteristic impedance (Ω)0.06824.3×10−131000.01718.62×10−13500.03416.0967×10−1370.7Figure6 shows the fabricated quasi-lumped antenna array. The overall dimensions of the antenna array are 31 × 36 mm2. A single-port array consists of 2 × 2 SR quasi-lumped elements in the top layer and a ground plane in the bottom layer. In the quarter-wave transformer method, an SR is used to feed the single-element resonators on a RO4003 C microwave substrate with a relative permittivity of 3.38 and a thickness of 0.813 mm. The width and length of the quarter-wavelength transformer are 1.036 and 7.03 mm, respectively, and the 100 Ω and 50 Ω impedance widths are equal to 0.46 mm and 1.898 mm, respectively. The resonating elements are spaced at half wavelengths, and the main purpose of the proposed antenna is to excite the elements and generate a circular radiation output, therefore implementing the shorting pins loading technique. The shorting pins are located at the center of the quasi-lumped element.Figure 6
Photograph of the fabricated quasi-lumped antenna array.Figure7 shows the power flow simulated by the CST software over the proposed antenna. The power flow from the feeding port over the quarter-wave feeding network to the radiating quasi-lumped elements reaches a maximum at 5.8 GHz, thus ensuring that the maximum power is radiated from the quasi-lumped radiators. The magnitude of the current density for an array element at 5.8 GHz is depicted in Figure 8, and it can be observed that the current distribution is concentrated within the quasi-lumped fingers.Figure 7
Power flow in the proposed quasi-lumped antenna array at 5.8 GHz.Figure 8
Surface current distribution for an array element at 5.8 GHz.Figure9 shows the effect of changes in the shorting diameter on S11 for a single resonance quasi-lumped element, simulated using CST Microwave Studio. It can be seen that the proposed resonator operates at 5.8 GHz without the use of shorting pins. In addition, when the diameter is increased, the resonance shifts to a higher frequency. When the diameter of the shorting pin is 2 mm, the optimum return loss is reached at −24.94 dB.Figure 9
Effects of changes in the diameter of the shorting pin diameter onS11.Figure10 presents the simulated and measured results for the input return loss. The return loss calculated using ADS modeling occurs at 5.8 GHz, with a minimal value of −20.81 dB. Based on this result, we were able to validate the intended design before prototyping was carried out and measurements were taken. At this stage, various design parameters were not considered, such as the surrounding boundary of the antenna, soldering, and mismatches, and this can explain the slight difference between the modeled results and the simulated and measured ones. The simulated return loss exhibited a bandwidth of 201 MHz in the range 5.66–5.861 GHz, with a minimal loss of 35.5 dB at 5.81 GHz. The measured return loss exhibited a bandwidth of 222 MHz in the range 5.645–5.867 GHz, with a minimal loss of 35.68 dB at 5.814 GHz. We can therefore say that there is a good agreement between the simulated and measured results. The divergence in the results is primarily due to small construction errors and the nonuniformity arising from the manual soldering of the SMA connectors.Figure 10
Simulated and measured reflection coefficients.The simulated and measured E-co-polarization (RHCP) and E-cross-polarization (LHCP) patterns in thexz plane at the design frequency of 5.8 GHz are shown in Figure 11(b). Here, co-polarization (RHCP) is higher than cross polarization (LHCP) by 30 dB in the broadside direction. In general, the variance between the simulated and measured antenna patterns is within 20 dB, and the measured patterns agree well with the simulated ones. Figures 11(a) and 11(c) show the radiation patterns at the minimum and maximum resonance frequencies.Figure 11
Simulated and measured E-co-polarized and E-cross-polarized patterns at thexz plane: (a) at 5.7 GHz; (b) at 5.8 GHz; (c) at 5.85 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)Figure12 shows the ARs for the proposed antenna, which are determined by measuring the fields in the vertical and horizontal planes. The simulated and measured 3 dB AR bandwidths for the proposed antenna are 5.79–5.86 GHz and 5.77–5.86 GHz, respectively. The deviation between the simulated and measured results may be caused by several reasons such as the experiment accuracy, the experiment range, the loss tangent of the substrate, and the parasitic effects of the SMA connectors. However, the measured and simulated results show reasonable agreement.Figure 12
Simulated and measured 3 dB ARs.Figure13 shows the simulated and measured gains for the resonance bands. The maximum simulated gain is around 8 dBi at 5.66 GHz, while the maximum measured gain is 7.48 dBi at 5.66 GHz. This minor difference between the simulated and measured results can be attributed to fabrication tolerances and material losses. A reflector can be used in the bottom plane to enhance the gain performance.Figure 13
Simulated and measured gains.


## 5. Conclusion

In this study, a compactCP quasi-lumped antenna array was introduced. The proposed array was fed by a microstrip using the shorting pins technique to achieve CP radiation. The good agreement between the results from simulation and experiment validated our design. A significant reduction in the size of the array is observed compared to the conventional CP microstrip antennas reported in the literature. Table 4 presents a comparison between several reported 2 × 2 SR arrays and the array presented in this study.Table 4
Comparison of the proposed antenna array with several 2 × 2SR arrays reported in the literature at 5.8 GHz.
ReferencesPeak gain (dBi)Bandwidth (%)Cross polarization (dB)EfficiencySize based on wavelength[23]10.517.3925Not available1.34λ0×1.34λ0[29]7.4652Not availableNot available1.868λ0×1.868λ0[30]7.2528.515Not available0.64λ0×0.64λ0[31]8.252912Not available0.86λ0×0.86λ0Proposed work7.483.852080–84%0.696λ0×0.599λ0



---

*Source: 3874794-2021-09-18.xml*