# Development of Low Energy Gap and Fully Regioregular  Polythienylenevinylene Derivative

Authors: Tanya M. S. David; Cheng Zhang; Sam-Shajing Sun
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Low energy gap and fully regioregular conjugated polymers find its wide use in solar energy conversion applications.  This paper will first briefly review this type of polymers and also report synthesis and characterization of a specific example new polymer, a low energy gap, fully regioregular, terminal functionalized, and processable conjugated polymer poly-(3-dodecyloxy-2,5-thienylene vinylene) or PDDTV.  The polymer exhibited an optical energy gap of 1.46 eV based on the UV-vis-NIR absorption spectrum. The electrochemically measured highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) level is −4.79 eV, resulting in the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) level of −3.33 eV based on optical energy gap. The polymer was synthesized via Horner-Emmons condensation and is fairly soluble in common organic solvents such as tetrahydrofuran and chloroform with gentle heating.  DSC showed two endothermic peaks at 67°C and 227°C that can be attributed to transitions between crystalline and liquid states.  The polymer is thermally stable up to about 300°C.  This polymer appears very promising for cost-effective solar cell applications.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Availability of organic conjugated polymers with different frontier orbitals and energy gaps is crucial and vital for the development and optimizations of polymer based optoelectronic devices such as solar cells or photodetectors. Polythienylene vinylene (PTVs) are one class of conjugated polymers that are very attractive for optoelectronic applications due to its relatively lower energy gaps compared to polyphenylenevinylenes (PPVs) and polythiophenes (PThs), and particularly its capability of forming regioregular polymers with high crystallinity in solid states [1]. PTVs are derivatives of polythiophenes that have vinylene linkages between the aromatic thiophene rings. With the combination of the low resonance energy and good thermal stability of the thiophene ring, incorporation of the vinylene linkage as well as other tailoring methods into the macroscopic structure all contribute to the very promising electronic and photonic properties that have been observed from PTVs [2–4]. The introduction of the vinylene linkage into the polymer main chain lowers band gaps by about 0.3 eV in comparison to polythiophenes [4]. One of the appealing features about PTVs is that chemical modification for tuning optoelectronic properties can be done with relative ease and gives rise to promising properties.PTVs have been synthesized using a number of synthetic methods such as Ni-catalyzed Grignard [2, 5, 6], Stille coupling [7–9], Heck coupling [2], Horner-Emmons [1, 10], acyclic diene metathesis (ADMET) [11], dithiocarbamate route [12, 13], sulphinyl route [14], and bis(xanthate) route [14] (Figure 1).Figure 1
Various synthetic routes to synthesize PTV:1 [2, 5, 6],2 [7–9],3 [2],4 [1, 10],5 [11],6 [12, 13],7 [14], and8 [14].Many of these synthetic methods give regiorandom coupling (head-head and tail-tail) (Figure2). However, it has been shown that the Ni-catalyzed Grignard method and the Horner-Emmons method can promote 100% regioregular coupling (head-tail).Figure 2
Regiorandom and regioregular coupling of PTV polymer.Alkoxy-substituted PTV (RO-PTV) has been synthesized by many of these methods; however, the resulting polymers have a regiorandom coupling [7, 12]. From our earlier work on the synthesis of a 3-dodecyl-substituted PTV (RR-C12-PTV) via Horner-Emmons reaction as well as Stille coupling reaction [1], we learned that PTV from the Stille reaction was neither regioregular nor structurally free of defect. On the other hand, Horner-Emmons reaction produced C12-PTV with 100% head-to-tail regioregularity, which showed much higher crystallinity than the regiorandom C12-PTV obtained via the Stille coupling reaction [1].In this work, a 3-dodecyloxy-substituted PTV (C12O-PTV) or PDDTV, the alkoxy analog of our previously synthesized PTV, was synthesized by Horner-Emmons reaction utilizing asymmetrically functionalized monomers. A different synthetic approach was taken for the synthesis of PDDTV than our preciously synthesized RR-C12-PTV, which proved more favorable for the more electron rich alkoxy-substituted thiophene. Compared to PTV, the new PDDTV exhibits the advantage of having a lower band gap due to the electron donating properties of the alkoxy substituent and better for matching photons of similar energy on surface of the earth. The optoelectronic properties of the polymer will also be discussed.


## 2. Experimental Section

All commercially available products were used as received. Proton and carbon NMR spectra were recorded at a 300 MHz NMR spectrometer. Flash column chromatography was performed using Sigma-Aldrich silica gel 60 (200–400 mesh). Electrochemical studies (cyclic voltammetry) were performed on a Bioanalytical (BAS) Epsilon-100w tri-electrode cell system. Three electrodes are a glassy carbon working electrode, an ancillary Pt electrode, and a silver reference electrode (in a CH3CN solution of 0.01 M AgNO3 and 0.1 M TBA-HFP). The polymer samples were dried directly on the electrode and placed a solution of anhydrous CH3CN with 0.10 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBA-HFP). Ferrocene (2 mM in 0.10 M TBA-HFP/THF solution) was used as an internal reference standard (its HOMO level of −4.8 eV was used in calculations). Before starting a measurement, dry nitrogen gas was bubbled through the solution for at least 10 min to remove any dissolved oxygen. Between the experiments, the surface of the electrodes was cleaned or polished. Scan rate was 100 mV/s.


### 2.1. 3-Methoxythiophene (1)

Literature method was followed with minor modifications [15, 16].Copper bromide (9.629 g, 67 mmol) was weighed in a 500 mL round bottom flask and placed in a nitrogen atmosphere glove box. Within the glove box sodium methoxide (54.067 g, 1000 mmol) and dry NMP (171.476 g, 1729 mmol) were added, and the flask was stoppered and removed from the glove box. With a syringe, 3-bromothiophene (108.130 g, 663.2 mmol) was added, and the solid reagents were allowed to dissolve at 110°C for 15 min. After the addition of anhydrous methanol (100 mL), the reaction was allowed to reflux at 110°C for 3 hours and 15 minutes. Throughout the reaction time a receiving flask collected vaporized methanol. At reaction end, the product was separated by vacuum distillation, followed by washing the organic layer with water (100 mL × 3) and aqueous layer with pentane (100 mL × 3). The organic layer was then dried with magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) and filtered, and all the solvent was removed by a rotary evaporator. The product was pale yellow oil with a 78.59% yield. NMR data match with the literature data.


### 2.2. 3-Dodecyloxythiophene (2)

The literature method for 3-octylthiophene was followed [17].3-Methoxythiophene (26.86 g, 235 mmol), p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.91 g, 4.78 mmol), and 1-dodecanol (39.21 g, 210.4 mmol) were mixed together in a 1000 mL round bottom flask and refluxed at 92°C at low pressure (220 mTorr–132 mTorr) for 3.5 hours. The reaction was allowed to cool down to room temperature, followed by the addition of a 1 : 1 molar equivalent of sodium carbonate to p-toluenesulfonic acid in order to quench the acid. The solution was then washed with water (100 mL) and hexane (100 mL). Subsequent washings of the aqueous and organic layer were done with hexane (50 mL × 3) and water (50 mL × 3), respectively. Separation of organic layer was done by low pressure to vacuum distillation, and purification was performed by column chromatography (hexane as eluent). The product was a light green solid with a 91.64% (57.88 g) yield.1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.88 (t, 3H), 1.26 (m, 18H), 1.76 (t, 2H), 3.91 (t, 2H), 6.22 (t, 2H), 6.71 (t, 2H), 7.12 (t, 2H). 13C NMR: δ 14.1, 22.71, 26.0, 29.6, 31.9, 70.2, 76.6 (CDCl3), 96.9, 119.5, 124.4, 158.0. Anal. Calcd: C, 71.58; H, 10.51; S, 11.94. Found: C, 71.41; H, 10.57; S, 11.69.


### 2.3. 2,5-Dibromo-3-dodecyloxythiophene (3)

NBS (45 g, 247 mmol/~2.7 mol equiv.) was dissolved in anhydrous DMF (100 mL) and added dropwise to a mixture of 3-dodecyloxythiophene (27.88 g, 103.8 mmol) and anhydrous DMF (120 mL) in a low temperature bath. The addition and the reaction were done with the exclusion of light by covering the flask in a black plastic bag. The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 3–6 hours. The product was extracted with hexane and water (2 mL × 5) and purified by column chromatography (hexane as eluent). The product retrieved was light green oil with a yield 47.97% (18.09 g).1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.88 (t, 3H), 1.26 (m, 18H), 1.73 (t, 2H), 3.98 (t, 2H), 6.75 (s, 2H).13C NMR: δ 14.0, 22.6, 25.7, 29.3, 72.5, 76.5 (CDCl3), 90.5, 109.3, 120.8, 153.8 Anal. Calcd for C16H26Br2OS: C, 45.08; H, 6.15; Br, 37.49; S, 7.52 Found: C, 45.18; H, 6.22; Br, 37.27.


### 2.4. 3-Dodecyloxy-2,5-diformylthiophene (4)

Anhydrous THF (40 mL) was added to 2,5-dibromo-3-dodecyloxythiophene (12.2 g, 28.6 mmol). This mixture was then added dropwise, by syringe, to a mixture of THF (50 mL) and 1.6 M butyl lithium (53.66 mL/3 mol equiv.) that was in a dry ice/hexane bath. The reagents reacted at~
-
78°C for 5 to 10 minutes and then were removed from the dry ice bath. This solution was slowly added with a syringe to anhydrous DMF (7.09 mL, 3.2 mol eq.) and allowed to react for 5 minutes after addition. The product was extracted by first washing the solution with water (100 mL), hexane (100 mL), and acetic acid (15 mL to 20 mL) (which was monitored using litmus paper as the acid was added) in a separatory funnel. Once the organic and aqueous solution visibly separated, the aqueous layer was discarded, and sodium carbonate was added until the organic solution was basic. The organic layer was further washed with water (50 mL × 4) and aqueous layer with hexane (50 mL × 4). The product was dried with MgSO4, solvent removed by rotary evaporator, and the product recrystallized. The filtrate from the recrystallized crystals was purified using column chromatography (1EtAc:17 hexane used as eluent). The solid yellow product had a 59.5% (5.527 g) yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.87 (t, 3H), 1.26 (m, 18H), 1.85 (t, 2H), 4.21 (t, 2H), 7.25 (s, 1H), 9.89 (s, 1H), 10.1 (s, 1H). 13C NMR: δ 14.1, 22.6, 25.7, 29.6, 31.9, 72.4, 77.1 (CDCl3), 121.7, 127.4, 146.5, 163.2, 182.2, 183.0 Anal. Calcd for C18H28O3S: C, 66.63; H, 8.70; S, 9.88. Found: C, 66.91; H, 8.65; S, 9.81.


### 2.5. 3-Dodecyloxy-2-formyl-5-methylhydroxyl Thiophene (5)

A solution of ethyl alcohol (60 mL), 3-dodecyloxy-2,5-diformyl thiophene (3.69 g, 11.3 mmol), and sodium carbonate (4 drops) were allowed to stir at room temperature until all of the starting material dissolved. In a 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask, water (4 g) was added to potassium hydroxide flakes (3.22 g, 3 mol eq.) and the solid was first allowed to dissolve then placed in an ice bath to cool. Once the solution cooled, sodium borohydride (0.2154 g, 0.367 mol eq.) was then added and stirred until it dissolved. After the sodium borohydride dissolved, that solution was added dropwise to the 3-dodecyloxy-2,5-diformyl thiophene solution with vigorous stirring and allowed to react for five minutes. Next, in a warm water bath (40°C) solid sodium bicarbonate (5.82 g, 6.1 mol eq.) was added to the solution, and a light flow of air blew into the flask through a tube to slowly remove the ethanol. The solution was taken out of the warm bath after five minutes once the solution turned dark brown with a precipitate at the bottom of the flask. The product was extracted by first washing the solution with water (7 mL), and diethyl ether, and the aqueous layer was discarded. Then, water (2 mL) and sodium chloride (brine) were added to the organic layer and were discarded along with any inorganic salts. The organic layer was further washed with water (2 mL × 3) and aqueous layer with ether (3 mL × 4). The product was dried with MgSO4, and the solvent removed by rotary evaporator. The product was purified by column chromatography (1 EtAc:5 hexane used as eluent). The solid yellowish orange product had a 92.45% (3.43 g) yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.88 (t, 3H), 1.26 (m, 18H), 1.79 (t, 2H), 3.25 (t, 1H), 4.11 (t, 2H), 4.77 (d, 2H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 9.89 (s, 1H). 13C NMR: δ 14.1, 22.6, 25.8, 29.6, 31.9, 60.7, 72.0, 76.6 (CDCl3), 113.3, 119.7, 156.3, 164.9, 181.3 Anal. Calcd for C18H30O3S: C, 66.22; H, 9.26; S, 9.82. Found: C, 66.10; H, 9.26; S, 9.66.


### 2.6. 5-Chloromethyl-3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl Thiophene (6)

A solution of 3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl-5-methylhydroxyl thiophene (1.515 g, 4.64 mmol), anhydrous DCM (28 mL), and pyridine (0.734 g, 2 mol equ) were placed in a water bath with no ice (22°C) until the starting material dissolved. Then, 1.2 molar equivalence of thionyl chloride (0.406 mL, 0.662 g) was diluted with anhydrous DCM in a syringe (4 mL) and added dropwise by syringe to the solution. Once the addition was completed, the solution was added to a 2 : 1 molar ratio of 2 N HCl (4.6 mL) to pyridine and a few cubes of ice to quench the base. Extraction was done with ether and water (2 mL × 3). A small amount of sodium carbonate was added and monitored by litmus paper until reaction was neutral to slightly basic. The product was dried with MgSO4, and the solvent removed by rotary evaporator. No further purification was done on the sample, due to the possibility that it would decompose, so the yellowish orange solid product had a yield of 108% (1.714 g). The sample contained a small amount of impurity. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.87 (t, 3H), 1.26 (m, 18H), 1.80 (t, 2H), 4.13 (t, 2H), 4.66 (s, 2H), 6.88 (s, 2H), 9.96 (s, 1H). 13C NMR: δ 12.2, 20.8, 27.6, 30.0, 38.5, 70.2, 75.6 (CDCl3), 114.6, 119.6, 147.4, 161.8, 179.1.


### 2.7. (3-Dodecyloxy-2-formyl-thiophen-5-ylmethyl) Phosphonic Acid Diethyl Ester (7)

A solution of 3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl-5-methylhydroxyl thiophene (1.515 g, 4.64 mmol), anhydrous DCM (28 mL), and pyridine (0.734 g, 2 mol eq.) were placed in a water bath with no ice (22°C) until the starting material dissolved. Then, 1.2 molar equivalence of thionyl chloride (0.406 mL, 0.662 g) was diluted with anhydrous DCM in a syringe (4 mL) and added dropwise by syringe to the solution. Once the addition was completed, the solution was added to a 2 : 1 molar ratio of 2 N HCl (4.6 mL) to pyridine and a few cubes of ice to quench the base. Extraction was done with ether and water (2 mL × 3). A small amount of sodium carbonate was added and monitored by litmus paper until reaction was neutral to slightly basic. The product was dried with MgSO4, and the solvent removed by rotary evaporator. No further purification was done on the sample, due to the possibility that it would decompose, so the yellowish orange solid product had a yield of 108% (1.714 g). The sample contained a small amount of impurity. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.87 (t, 3H), 1.26 (m, 18H), 1.80 (t, 2H), 4.13 (t, 2H), 4.66 (s, 2H), 6.88 (s, 2H), 9.96 (s, 1H). 13C NMR: δ 12.2, 20.8, 27.6, 30.0, 38.5, 70.2, 75.6 (CDCl3), 114.6, 119.6, 147.4, 161.8, 179.1.


### 2.8. Poly-(3-dodecyloxy-2,5-thienylene Vinylene) (8)

Anhydrous THF (2 mL) and 1.2 molar equivalent of potassium t-butoxide (0.0959 g, 0.854 mmol) were added to (3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl-thiophen-5-ylmethyl) phosphonic acid diethyl ester (0.318 g, .712 mmol), in a nitrogen atmosphere glove box. After 3.5 hours of reacting at 78°C, the polymer was dissolved with THF and washed with methanol. The polymer was purified by filtration after washing with methanol. The bluish purple solid had a yield of 45.2% (0.094 mg).1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.87(t, (3H)n), 1.25 (m, (18H)n), 1.66 (t, (2H)n), 4.05 (t, (2H)n), 6.66, 6.74, 7.02, 7.07 (–C=C–, aromatic3), 9.90, 10.0 (–CHO).


## 2.1. 3-Methoxythiophene (1)

Literature method was followed with minor modifications [15, 16].Copper bromide (9.629 g, 67 mmol) was weighed in a 500 mL round bottom flask and placed in a nitrogen atmosphere glove box. Within the glove box sodium methoxide (54.067 g, 1000 mmol) and dry NMP (171.476 g, 1729 mmol) were added, and the flask was stoppered and removed from the glove box. With a syringe, 3-bromothiophene (108.130 g, 663.2 mmol) was added, and the solid reagents were allowed to dissolve at 110°C for 15 min. After the addition of anhydrous methanol (100 mL), the reaction was allowed to reflux at 110°C for 3 hours and 15 minutes. Throughout the reaction time a receiving flask collected vaporized methanol. At reaction end, the product was separated by vacuum distillation, followed by washing the organic layer with water (100 mL × 3) and aqueous layer with pentane (100 mL × 3). The organic layer was then dried with magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) and filtered, and all the solvent was removed by a rotary evaporator. The product was pale yellow oil with a 78.59% yield. NMR data match with the literature data.


## 2.2. 3-Dodecyloxythiophene (2)

The literature method for 3-octylthiophene was followed [17].3-Methoxythiophene (26.86 g, 235 mmol), p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.91 g, 4.78 mmol), and 1-dodecanol (39.21 g, 210.4 mmol) were mixed together in a 1000 mL round bottom flask and refluxed at 92°C at low pressure (220 mTorr–132 mTorr) for 3.5 hours. The reaction was allowed to cool down to room temperature, followed by the addition of a 1 : 1 molar equivalent of sodium carbonate to p-toluenesulfonic acid in order to quench the acid. The solution was then washed with water (100 mL) and hexane (100 mL). Subsequent washings of the aqueous and organic layer were done with hexane (50 mL × 3) and water (50 mL × 3), respectively. Separation of organic layer was done by low pressure to vacuum distillation, and purification was performed by column chromatography (hexane as eluent). The product was a light green solid with a 91.64% (57.88 g) yield.1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.88 (t, 3H), 1.26 (m, 18H), 1.76 (t, 2H), 3.91 (t, 2H), 6.22 (t, 2H), 6.71 (t, 2H), 7.12 (t, 2H). 13C NMR: δ 14.1, 22.71, 26.0, 29.6, 31.9, 70.2, 76.6 (CDCl3), 96.9, 119.5, 124.4, 158.0. Anal. Calcd: C, 71.58; H, 10.51; S, 11.94. Found: C, 71.41; H, 10.57; S, 11.69.


## 2.3. 2,5-Dibromo-3-dodecyloxythiophene (3)

NBS (45 g, 247 mmol/~2.7 mol equiv.) was dissolved in anhydrous DMF (100 mL) and added dropwise to a mixture of 3-dodecyloxythiophene (27.88 g, 103.8 mmol) and anhydrous DMF (120 mL) in a low temperature bath. The addition and the reaction were done with the exclusion of light by covering the flask in a black plastic bag. The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 3–6 hours. The product was extracted with hexane and water (2 mL × 5) and purified by column chromatography (hexane as eluent). The product retrieved was light green oil with a yield 47.97% (18.09 g).1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.88 (t, 3H), 1.26 (m, 18H), 1.73 (t, 2H), 3.98 (t, 2H), 6.75 (s, 2H).13C NMR: δ 14.0, 22.6, 25.7, 29.3, 72.5, 76.5 (CDCl3), 90.5, 109.3, 120.8, 153.8 Anal. Calcd for C16H26Br2OS: C, 45.08; H, 6.15; Br, 37.49; S, 7.52 Found: C, 45.18; H, 6.22; Br, 37.27.


## 2.4. 3-Dodecyloxy-2,5-diformylthiophene (4)

Anhydrous THF (40 mL) was added to 2,5-dibromo-3-dodecyloxythiophene (12.2 g, 28.6 mmol). This mixture was then added dropwise, by syringe, to a mixture of THF (50 mL) and 1.6 M butyl lithium (53.66 mL/3 mol equiv.) that was in a dry ice/hexane bath. The reagents reacted at~
-
78°C for 5 to 10 minutes and then were removed from the dry ice bath. This solution was slowly added with a syringe to anhydrous DMF (7.09 mL, 3.2 mol eq.) and allowed to react for 5 minutes after addition. The product was extracted by first washing the solution with water (100 mL), hexane (100 mL), and acetic acid (15 mL to 20 mL) (which was monitored using litmus paper as the acid was added) in a separatory funnel. Once the organic and aqueous solution visibly separated, the aqueous layer was discarded, and sodium carbonate was added until the organic solution was basic. The organic layer was further washed with water (50 mL × 4) and aqueous layer with hexane (50 mL × 4). The product was dried with MgSO4, solvent removed by rotary evaporator, and the product recrystallized. The filtrate from the recrystallized crystals was purified using column chromatography (1EtAc:17 hexane used as eluent). The solid yellow product had a 59.5% (5.527 g) yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.87 (t, 3H), 1.26 (m, 18H), 1.85 (t, 2H), 4.21 (t, 2H), 7.25 (s, 1H), 9.89 (s, 1H), 10.1 (s, 1H). 13C NMR: δ 14.1, 22.6, 25.7, 29.6, 31.9, 72.4, 77.1 (CDCl3), 121.7, 127.4, 146.5, 163.2, 182.2, 183.0 Anal. Calcd for C18H28O3S: C, 66.63; H, 8.70; S, 9.88. Found: C, 66.91; H, 8.65; S, 9.81.


## 2.5. 3-Dodecyloxy-2-formyl-5-methylhydroxyl Thiophene (5)

A solution of ethyl alcohol (60 mL), 3-dodecyloxy-2,5-diformyl thiophene (3.69 g, 11.3 mmol), and sodium carbonate (4 drops) were allowed to stir at room temperature until all of the starting material dissolved. In a 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask, water (4 g) was added to potassium hydroxide flakes (3.22 g, 3 mol eq.) and the solid was first allowed to dissolve then placed in an ice bath to cool. Once the solution cooled, sodium borohydride (0.2154 g, 0.367 mol eq.) was then added and stirred until it dissolved. After the sodium borohydride dissolved, that solution was added dropwise to the 3-dodecyloxy-2,5-diformyl thiophene solution with vigorous stirring and allowed to react for five minutes. Next, in a warm water bath (40°C) solid sodium bicarbonate (5.82 g, 6.1 mol eq.) was added to the solution, and a light flow of air blew into the flask through a tube to slowly remove the ethanol. The solution was taken out of the warm bath after five minutes once the solution turned dark brown with a precipitate at the bottom of the flask. The product was extracted by first washing the solution with water (7 mL), and diethyl ether, and the aqueous layer was discarded. Then, water (2 mL) and sodium chloride (brine) were added to the organic layer and were discarded along with any inorganic salts. The organic layer was further washed with water (2 mL × 3) and aqueous layer with ether (3 mL × 4). The product was dried with MgSO4, and the solvent removed by rotary evaporator. The product was purified by column chromatography (1 EtAc:5 hexane used as eluent). The solid yellowish orange product had a 92.45% (3.43 g) yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.88 (t, 3H), 1.26 (m, 18H), 1.79 (t, 2H), 3.25 (t, 1H), 4.11 (t, 2H), 4.77 (d, 2H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 9.89 (s, 1H). 13C NMR: δ 14.1, 22.6, 25.8, 29.6, 31.9, 60.7, 72.0, 76.6 (CDCl3), 113.3, 119.7, 156.3, 164.9, 181.3 Anal. Calcd for C18H30O3S: C, 66.22; H, 9.26; S, 9.82. Found: C, 66.10; H, 9.26; S, 9.66.


## 2.6. 5-Chloromethyl-3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl Thiophene (6)

A solution of 3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl-5-methylhydroxyl thiophene (1.515 g, 4.64 mmol), anhydrous DCM (28 mL), and pyridine (0.734 g, 2 mol equ) were placed in a water bath with no ice (22°C) until the starting material dissolved. Then, 1.2 molar equivalence of thionyl chloride (0.406 mL, 0.662 g) was diluted with anhydrous DCM in a syringe (4 mL) and added dropwise by syringe to the solution. Once the addition was completed, the solution was added to a 2 : 1 molar ratio of 2 N HCl (4.6 mL) to pyridine and a few cubes of ice to quench the base. Extraction was done with ether and water (2 mL × 3). A small amount of sodium carbonate was added and monitored by litmus paper until reaction was neutral to slightly basic. The product was dried with MgSO4, and the solvent removed by rotary evaporator. No further purification was done on the sample, due to the possibility that it would decompose, so the yellowish orange solid product had a yield of 108% (1.714 g). The sample contained a small amount of impurity. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.87 (t, 3H), 1.26 (m, 18H), 1.80 (t, 2H), 4.13 (t, 2H), 4.66 (s, 2H), 6.88 (s, 2H), 9.96 (s, 1H). 13C NMR: δ 12.2, 20.8, 27.6, 30.0, 38.5, 70.2, 75.6 (CDCl3), 114.6, 119.6, 147.4, 161.8, 179.1.


## 2.7. (3-Dodecyloxy-2-formyl-thiophen-5-ylmethyl) Phosphonic Acid Diethyl Ester (7)

A solution of 3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl-5-methylhydroxyl thiophene (1.515 g, 4.64 mmol), anhydrous DCM (28 mL), and pyridine (0.734 g, 2 mol eq.) were placed in a water bath with no ice (22°C) until the starting material dissolved. Then, 1.2 molar equivalence of thionyl chloride (0.406 mL, 0.662 g) was diluted with anhydrous DCM in a syringe (4 mL) and added dropwise by syringe to the solution. Once the addition was completed, the solution was added to a 2 : 1 molar ratio of 2 N HCl (4.6 mL) to pyridine and a few cubes of ice to quench the base. Extraction was done with ether and water (2 mL × 3). A small amount of sodium carbonate was added and monitored by litmus paper until reaction was neutral to slightly basic. The product was dried with MgSO4, and the solvent removed by rotary evaporator. No further purification was done on the sample, due to the possibility that it would decompose, so the yellowish orange solid product had a yield of 108% (1.714 g). The sample contained a small amount of impurity. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.87 (t, 3H), 1.26 (m, 18H), 1.80 (t, 2H), 4.13 (t, 2H), 4.66 (s, 2H), 6.88 (s, 2H), 9.96 (s, 1H). 13C NMR: δ 12.2, 20.8, 27.6, 30.0, 38.5, 70.2, 75.6 (CDCl3), 114.6, 119.6, 147.4, 161.8, 179.1.


## 2.8. Poly-(3-dodecyloxy-2,5-thienylene Vinylene) (8)

Anhydrous THF (2 mL) and 1.2 molar equivalent of potassium t-butoxide (0.0959 g, 0.854 mmol) were added to (3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl-thiophen-5-ylmethyl) phosphonic acid diethyl ester (0.318 g, .712 mmol), in a nitrogen atmosphere glove box. After 3.5 hours of reacting at 78°C, the polymer was dissolved with THF and washed with methanol. The polymer was purified by filtration after washing with methanol. The bluish purple solid had a yield of 45.2% (0.094 mg).1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 0.87(t, (3H)n), 1.25 (m, (18H)n), 1.66 (t, (2H)n), 4.05 (t, (2H)n), 6.66, 6.74, 7.02, 7.07 (–C=C–, aromatic3), 9.90, 10.0 (–CHO).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1.  Synthesis

In order to promote 100% regioregularity in the polymer, a monomer was designed and synthesized to be monoaldehyde monophosphonate functionalized (asymmetric), as to eliminate any possibility of regiorandomness as seen in polymers of difunctionalized monomers [12, 14, 18]. The asymmetric PTV monomer, (3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl-thiophen-5-ylmethyl) phosphonic acid diethyl ester (7), was synthesized using a seven-step synthetic process (Figure 3). In order to form the asymmetric functional groups on the thiophene ring, the alkoxy thiophene underwent bromonation to form the dibromo groups (3), followed by formylation to form dialdehyde (4). Then, one of the dialdehydes was selectively reduced to a hydroxyl group (5), which was in the proceeding reaction chlorinated (6). The phosphonate functional group was formed successfully using Michaelis-Arbusov reaction (7). The 1H NMR of the monomer (7) is shown in Figure 4.Figure 3
Synthetic scheme for asymmetric monomer7 (3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl-thiophen-5-ylmethyl) phosphonic acid diethyl ester.Figure 4
1H NMR spectrum of (3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl-thiophen-5-ylmethyl) phosphonic acid diethyl ester.The Horner-Emmons reactivity of the monomer7 with potassium tert-butoxide (a nucleophile) is much lower than its alkyl version [1] possibly due to the lack of electron deficiency of the aldehyde group resulting in low reactivity. In the first trial and second trial, THF and t-BuOK were added to the monomer and allowed to react at room temperature for 10–20 minutes. In the first trial, the color of the reaction changed from reddish amber to green. However, the 1H NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture extract showed that there was only monomer in the solution; no polymer had formed. In the second trial the solution contained only 8% of the polymer. Since the first and second trials were not fully successful the solvent was changed from THF (a weakly polar aprotic solvent) to dimethylformamide (DMF) (stronger polar aprotic solvent) and allowed to react for 20 hrs. The change in solvent was to determine if the reaction environment to polymerize was polar enough. The 1H NMR showed no reaction occurred, and only starting material remained. After it was concluded from the third trial that THF was a sufficient enough solvent for the reaction, the reaction conditions from the second trial were repeated with the exception of duration and temperature. The reaction was boiled for 10 minutes, and the 1H NMR showed that only 15% of the monomer remained. Most of the polymer had formed. Once the reaction condition was determined, the remaining monomer reaction mixture was allowed to react for 3.5 hours at 78°C (Figure 5). The 1H NMR shown in Figure 6 indicate the formation of polymer (8) as evidenced from the loss of –CH2 doublet peak of –CH2P(O)(OCH2CH3)2 (position 5) and the –CHO peak (position 2) on the monomer (Figure 4). –OCH2 peaks from the dodecyloxy substituent on the monomer (position 3, D) appeared at 4.0 ppm on the 1H NMR (Figure 6). Peaks from the phosphonate group also disappeared. The broadening of the other peaks, especially those in the aromatic region (A–C), is another indication of the polymer formation.Figure 5
Polymerization of asymmetric monomer7.Figure 6
1H NMR spectrum of poly (3-dodecyloxy-2,5-thienylene vinylene).


### 3.2. Thermal Properties

Thermal properties of the PDDTV (polymer8) were studied using TGA and DSC under Nitrogen atmosphere. The DSC thermogram (Figure 7) shows two endothermic peaks at 67°C and 227°C. These data could indicate that this polymer exhibits polymorphic behavior similar to the reported comparable poly(3-alkyl thiophene)s [19, 20]. The peak at 67°C could be attributed to the transition from crystalline state to liquid crystal (mesophase). The second peak at 227°C could be due to the transition from liquid crystal (mesophase) to an isotropic liquid [19, 20]. The exothermic peak with an onset at 290°C is due to decomposition by reactions involving C=C bonds. Figure 8 shows the TGA graph of the polymer. A weight loss of 5% starts at ~330°C.Figure 7
DSC plot of the PDDTV with a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.Figure 8
TGA plot of the PDDTV with a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.


### 3.3. Optoelectronic Properties

UV-vis absorption spectrum was used to determine theπ-π
* transition and the excitation energy gap of the polymer8 backbone. The optical excitation energy gap was measured at 1.46 eV from the onset of the UV-vis absorption peak in chloroform. A UV-vis spectrum of P3HT in chloroform was also measured to compare the absorption shift of polymer (8) with that of P3HT. As shown in Figure 9, there is a red shift of polymer (8) absorption peak in comparison with P3HT, with a lambda max at 662 nm and a shoulder peak at 723 nm (P3HT has a lambda max absorption at 450 nm). The shoulder at 723 nm could be attributed to the vibronic fine structure seen in fully regioregular PTVs [19]. Photoluminescence measurements were conducted; however, there was no observable emission. This is in agreement with previous observations that PTVs have little or no luminescence due to the forbidden transition from the lowest energy excite state (2
A
g) to the ground state (1
A
g) [9].Figure 9
Absorption spectra of PDDTV versus P3HT.


### 3.4. Electrochemical Properties

The electrochemical properties of the polymer (8) were studied using cyclic voltammetry (CV). The first onset of oxidation potential was used to determine the HOMO level. The LUMO level was calculated from the optical excitation energy gap combined with the measured HOMO (ELUMO = Optical Eg + EHOMO). The identification of the HOMO level position was based on the correlation between oxidation potentials and the HOMO orbitals were referenced to ferrocene. The CV graph of the polymer8 is shown in Figure 10, and the results of the calculations are given in Table 1. The calculated HOMO level was −4.79 eV and the calculated LUMO using the above equation was −3.33 eV. Since the oxidation is reversible, this polymer (8) is very stable for a variety of optoelectronic applications as a donor or p-type material. The reduction is not reversible on the other hand, but that is not a major concern as this material will not be used as an N-type or acceptor material. For a donor material, a photovoltaic process is similar to an electrochemical redox process with the removal and recovery of electrons during the oxidation process.Table 1
Electrochemical onset potential and electronic energy levels of the polymer.
φ
ox (eV)
HOMO (eV)
LUMO (eV)
0.049
−4.789
−3.329Figure 10
Cyclic voltamogram of the PDDTV dried on a platinum electrode immersed in a solution of AgNO3 and Bu4NPF6, in CH3CN.


## 3.1.  Synthesis

In order to promote 100% regioregularity in the polymer, a monomer was designed and synthesized to be monoaldehyde monophosphonate functionalized (asymmetric), as to eliminate any possibility of regiorandomness as seen in polymers of difunctionalized monomers [12, 14, 18]. The asymmetric PTV monomer, (3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl-thiophen-5-ylmethyl) phosphonic acid diethyl ester (7), was synthesized using a seven-step synthetic process (Figure 3). In order to form the asymmetric functional groups on the thiophene ring, the alkoxy thiophene underwent bromonation to form the dibromo groups (3), followed by formylation to form dialdehyde (4). Then, one of the dialdehydes was selectively reduced to a hydroxyl group (5), which was in the proceeding reaction chlorinated (6). The phosphonate functional group was formed successfully using Michaelis-Arbusov reaction (7). The 1H NMR of the monomer (7) is shown in Figure 4.Figure 3
Synthetic scheme for asymmetric monomer7 (3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl-thiophen-5-ylmethyl) phosphonic acid diethyl ester.Figure 4
1H NMR spectrum of (3-dodecyloxy-2-formyl-thiophen-5-ylmethyl) phosphonic acid diethyl ester.The Horner-Emmons reactivity of the monomer7 with potassium tert-butoxide (a nucleophile) is much lower than its alkyl version [1] possibly due to the lack of electron deficiency of the aldehyde group resulting in low reactivity. In the first trial and second trial, THF and t-BuOK were added to the monomer and allowed to react at room temperature for 10–20 minutes. In the first trial, the color of the reaction changed from reddish amber to green. However, the 1H NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture extract showed that there was only monomer in the solution; no polymer had formed. In the second trial the solution contained only 8% of the polymer. Since the first and second trials were not fully successful the solvent was changed from THF (a weakly polar aprotic solvent) to dimethylformamide (DMF) (stronger polar aprotic solvent) and allowed to react for 20 hrs. The change in solvent was to determine if the reaction environment to polymerize was polar enough. The 1H NMR showed no reaction occurred, and only starting material remained. After it was concluded from the third trial that THF was a sufficient enough solvent for the reaction, the reaction conditions from the second trial were repeated with the exception of duration and temperature. The reaction was boiled for 10 minutes, and the 1H NMR showed that only 15% of the monomer remained. Most of the polymer had formed. Once the reaction condition was determined, the remaining monomer reaction mixture was allowed to react for 3.5 hours at 78°C (Figure 5). The 1H NMR shown in Figure 6 indicate the formation of polymer (8) as evidenced from the loss of –CH2 doublet peak of –CH2P(O)(OCH2CH3)2 (position 5) and the –CHO peak (position 2) on the monomer (Figure 4). –OCH2 peaks from the dodecyloxy substituent on the monomer (position 3, D) appeared at 4.0 ppm on the 1H NMR (Figure 6). Peaks from the phosphonate group also disappeared. The broadening of the other peaks, especially those in the aromatic region (A–C), is another indication of the polymer formation.Figure 5
Polymerization of asymmetric monomer7.Figure 6
1H NMR spectrum of poly (3-dodecyloxy-2,5-thienylene vinylene).


## 3.2. Thermal Properties

Thermal properties of the PDDTV (polymer8) were studied using TGA and DSC under Nitrogen atmosphere. The DSC thermogram (Figure 7) shows two endothermic peaks at 67°C and 227°C. These data could indicate that this polymer exhibits polymorphic behavior similar to the reported comparable poly(3-alkyl thiophene)s [19, 20]. The peak at 67°C could be attributed to the transition from crystalline state to liquid crystal (mesophase). The second peak at 227°C could be due to the transition from liquid crystal (mesophase) to an isotropic liquid [19, 20]. The exothermic peak with an onset at 290°C is due to decomposition by reactions involving C=C bonds. Figure 8 shows the TGA graph of the polymer. A weight loss of 5% starts at ~330°C.Figure 7
DSC plot of the PDDTV with a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.Figure 8
TGA plot of the PDDTV with a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.


## 3.3. Optoelectronic Properties

UV-vis absorption spectrum was used to determine theπ-π
* transition and the excitation energy gap of the polymer8 backbone. The optical excitation energy gap was measured at 1.46 eV from the onset of the UV-vis absorption peak in chloroform. A UV-vis spectrum of P3HT in chloroform was also measured to compare the absorption shift of polymer (8) with that of P3HT. As shown in Figure 9, there is a red shift of polymer (8) absorption peak in comparison with P3HT, with a lambda max at 662 nm and a shoulder peak at 723 nm (P3HT has a lambda max absorption at 450 nm). The shoulder at 723 nm could be attributed to the vibronic fine structure seen in fully regioregular PTVs [19]. Photoluminescence measurements were conducted; however, there was no observable emission. This is in agreement with previous observations that PTVs have little or no luminescence due to the forbidden transition from the lowest energy excite state (2
A
g) to the ground state (1
A
g) [9].Figure 9
Absorption spectra of PDDTV versus P3HT.


## 3.4. Electrochemical Properties

The electrochemical properties of the polymer (8) were studied using cyclic voltammetry (CV). The first onset of oxidation potential was used to determine the HOMO level. The LUMO level was calculated from the optical excitation energy gap combined with the measured HOMO (ELUMO = Optical Eg + EHOMO). The identification of the HOMO level position was based on the correlation between oxidation potentials and the HOMO orbitals were referenced to ferrocene. The CV graph of the polymer8 is shown in Figure 10, and the results of the calculations are given in Table 1. The calculated HOMO level was −4.79 eV and the calculated LUMO using the above equation was −3.33 eV. Since the oxidation is reversible, this polymer (8) is very stable for a variety of optoelectronic applications as a donor or p-type material. The reduction is not reversible on the other hand, but that is not a major concern as this material will not be used as an N-type or acceptor material. For a donor material, a photovoltaic process is similar to an electrochemical redox process with the removal and recovery of electrons during the oxidation process.Table 1
Electrochemical onset potential and electronic energy levels of the polymer.
φ
ox (eV)
HOMO (eV)
LUMO (eV)
0.049
−4.789
−3.329Figure 10
Cyclic voltamogram of the PDDTV dried on a platinum electrode immersed in a solution of AgNO3 and Bu4NPF6, in CH3CN.


## 4. Conclusions

Fully regioregular and terminally functionalized poly(3-dodecyloxy-2,5-thienylene vinylene) or PDDTV has been successfully synthesized via Horner-Emmons reaction. Regioregularity coupling was ensured by the design and polymerization of an asymmetrically functionalized monomer (monoaldehyde monophosphonate). Monomer and polymer formation were confirmed by NMR. The synthetic method utilized in this research allows for an alternative approach for the synthesis of alkoxy-substituted PTV, while ensuring regioregularity. The method also provides facile approaches to synthesizing difunctionalized symmetric and asymmetric intermediate alkoxy-substituted thiophene compounds.Optical characterization of the polymer showed a distinct red shift in the absorption spectra when compared to P3HT with aλ
max
at 662 nm and a shoulder peak at 723 nm. The measured optical energy gap is at 1.46 eV, which is an acceptable energy to capture photons in the highest irradiation range on the Earth’s surface of 1 to 2 eV. This band gap is also as much as ~0.3 eV less than other reported PTVs [1–3, 7]. Electrochemical characterization of the polymer indicated that the electrooxidation process is reversible but the electroreduction process was nonreversible. The CV measured HOMO level is at −4.79 eV. The polymer is partially soluble in common organic solvents such as tetrahydrofuran and chloroform, and solubility increases at elevated temperatures. The TGA and DSC showed that the polymer has good thermal stability with onsets of decomposition at 330°C and 290°C, respectively.This polymer shows great promise as a p-type material for photovoltaic application with its low optical energy gap and good thermal stability. Further optoelectronic studies including morphological studies and device fabrications will be studied and reported separately.



---

*Source: 379372-2014-09-03.xml*