# Determination of the Binding Parameters between Proteins and Luminol by Chemiluminescence Using Flow Injection Technique

Authors: Jie Guo; Donghua Chen; Zhenghua Song
Journal: ISRN Analytical Chemistry
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The interaction behavior of bovine serum albumin (BSA), lysozyme (LYS), myoglobin (MB), and catalase (CAT) with luminol, respectively, was first studied by chemiluminescence (CL) using flow injection (FI) technique based on the fact that the studied proteins can enhance the CL intensity of luminol. A FI-CL model of protein-luminol interaction,lg[(I0−I)/I]=1/nlg[P]+1/nlgKa+2lgn, was constructed, and the interaction parameters of BSA, LYS, MB, and CAT with luminol were determined accordingly. The binding constants Ka are in the descending order of CAT > MB > LYS > BSA at the level of 105 to 107 L mol−1, and the number of binding sites n of luminol to BSA or LYS is around 2 and to MB or CAT is around 1. The results of thermodynamic parameters (ΔH,
ΔS,
and ΔG)
showed that the binding processes of luminol to the four proteins are spontaneous mainly through the hydrophobic force.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Proteins possess many biological functions including binding, catalysis, operating as molecular switches, and serving as structural components of cells and organisms [1, 2] and play an important role in the transportation and deposition of various endogenous and exogenous substances [3, 4]. In recent years, the interaction of protein with small molecules has become a hot spot in the fields of chemistry, biology, and medicine [5–7]. As common model proteins, bovine serum albumin (BSA) [8], lysozyme (LYS) [9], myoglobin (MB) [10], and catalase (CAT) [11] are widely applied to the study of protein-small molecule interaction. Accordingly, many methods have been utilized to investigate this hot topic, such as fluorescence spectroscopy [12], resonance light scattering [13], circular dichroism [14], nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy [15], and chemiluminescence (CL) with flow injection (FI) technique [16]. The FI-CL analysis has proven to be a very useful analytical method with advantages of simple apparatus, high sensitivity, wide dynamic ranges, reproducibility, automatability, less reagent consumption [17–19], and so forth.Luminol (5-amino-2, 3-dihydro-1, 4-phthalazinedione) is known to produce CL with the characteristic wavelength of 425 nm under alkaline condition [20, 21], making it widely used around the world as a blood enhancement technique in forensic science. Also this luminescent compound is used clinically in the treatment of alopecia [22], the promotion of blood clotting [23], and wound healing [24]. Due to its high quantum yield, the CL of luminol has been used in many laboratory applications, including environmental field of analyzing trace metals [25, 26], food safety field [27], biological field of immunoassays, monitoring of metabolic pathways, and detection of free radicals [28]. Recently, the CL of luminol has been employed to study its interaction behavior with serum albumins [12, 29].In our previous study, it was found that BSA, LYS, MB, and CAT can accelerate the electrons transferring rate of excited 3-aminophthalate leading to enhancement of CL intensity from luminol [30–33]. However, no comprehensive data have been available on the binding parameters of the four proteins with luminol so far. The main aims of the current paper are to: (a) construct a mathematical model of protein-luminol interaction: lg[(I0-I)/I]=1/nlg[P]+1/nlgKa+2lgn, based on the enhancing effect of protein-to-luminol  CL intensity, (b) obtain the binding parameters of proteins with luminol, and (c) give the thermodynamic parameters of protein-luminol binding process.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Reagents

All reagents used were of analytical reagent grade unless otherwise  specified and doubly deionized water was purified in a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) for the preparation of solutions in the whole procedure. Luminol (Fluka, Switzerland), BSA (Sigma), LYS (Sigma), MB (Sigma), and CAT (Sigma) were used as received without further purification. Luminol (2.5 × 10−2 mol L−1) was prepared by dissolving 0.44 g luminol in 100 mL of 0.1 mol L−1 NaOH solution in a brown calibrated flask. BSA, LYS, MB, and CAT (5.0 × 10−5 mol L−1) were prepared in purified water and stored at 4°C.


### 2.2. Apparatus

The FI-CL system used in this work was illustrated schematically in Figure1. The flow system consisted of three lines for delivery protein, luminol/NaOH, and carrier solution. The IFFM-A Luminescence Analyzer (Xi’an Remax Electronic Science and Technology Co., and Ltd., Xi’an, China) contained the sampling system, the photomultiplier tube (PMT), and the PC with an IFFM-A client system (Remax, Xi’an, China). Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tube (1.0 mm i.d.) was used to connect all the components of the flow system. A six-way valve with a loop of 100 μL was used for quantitatively injecting luminol into carrier stream. The CL detector contained a flow cell made by coiling 15 cm of colorless glass tube (1.0 mm i.d.) into a spiral disk shape with a diameter of 2.0 cm and placed close to the PMT. Extreme precautions were taken to ensure that the sample compartment and PMT were light tight. The CL signal produced in flow cell was detected without wavelength discrimination, and the PMT output was recorded by computer with IFFM-E client system. The temperature of the solutions was controlled (T ± 0.1°C) in a water bath.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the present FI-CL system. P: pump; M: mixing tube; V: valve; FC: flow cell; W: waste; PC: personal computer.


### 2.3. General Procedures

The carrier (purified water), the solutions of luminol, and proteins were propelled by peristaltic pumps at a flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1 on each flow line. The whole flow system was washed until a stable baseline was recorded. Then 100 μL of luminol solution was injected into the carrier stream by the six-way valve and merged with proteins. The whole mixed solution was delivered into the flow cell, and the emitted CL was collected by the PMT at a voltage of −700 V and recorded by the computer. The increment of CL intensity (ΔI=I-I0, where I and  I0 were CL signals in the presence and in the absence of proteins) was measured.


### 2.4. Optimization of the Experimental Conditions

The effect of luminol concentration on the CL intensity was examined over the ranges of 5.0 × 10−7 to 5.0 × 10−4 mol L−1. It was found that the maximum CL intensity could be obtained at 2.5 × 10−5 mol L−1 luminol. Therefore, 2.5 × 10−5 mol L−1 luminol was chosen as the optimum concentration and used in subsequent experiments. A series of NaOH solutions with different concentrations ranging from 1.0 × 10−3 to 0.1 mol L−1 were tested, and 2.5 × 10−2 mol L−1 NaOH was used as the optimum concentration. The flow rate and the length of mixing tube had a great effect on the CL intensity. A flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1 and the length of mixing tube of 10.0 cm were selected in this work with good sensitivity, precision, and reproducibility.


### 2.5. The Operational Stability of the FI-CL System

Luminol alkaline solution (100μL) was injected into the flow system in the presence of 2.5 × 10−5 mol L−1 luminol and 5.0 × 10−8 mol L−1  proteins, and the CL intensity was recorded to test the stability of luminol-protein system. This experiment lasted for 3 days, and the flow system was regularly used over 8 hours per day. The results showed that the relative standard deviations were less than 3.0%, so the luminol-protein system exerted good stability.


### 2.6. Constructing the Binding Model of Protein with Luminol

It is known that proteins are biomacromolecules with binding sites for small molecules. Assuming that the number of binding sites of the small molecule luminol(L) to protein (P) is n, each site is independent and has the same intrinsic affinity for the ligand [34, 35]. The protein-luminol complex (PLn) is formed, and the binding process can be expressed as follows:
(1)P+nL⇌KaPLn
or
(2)1nP+L⇌KP1/nL,
where P, L, n, and PLn represent protein, luminol, the number of binding sites, and protein-luminol complex, respectively. The binding constant Ka or K is
(3)Ka=[PLn][P][L]norK=[P1/nL][P]1/n[L],
where [PLn], [P], and [L] represent the concentrations of protein-luminol complex, protein, and luminol at equilibrium state, respectively, and [P1/nL] is the concentration of product for reaction (2).According to chemical reaction equilibrium theory,(4)Ka=Kn,(5)[P1/nL]=1n[P]b=1n2[L]b.The CL intensity of luminol is proportional to its concentration. Equations (6) and (7) can be obtained as
(6)I0∝[L]t,
where I0 is the CL intensity in the absence of protein; [L]t  is the total concentration of luminol as
(7)I-I0∝[L]b,
where I is the CL intensity in the presence of protein; [L]b is the concentration of luminol at equilibrium. Using (6) and (7) in (5) leads to
(8)K=(1/n2)(I-I0)[P]1/nI0.
Taking logarithms of both sides,
(9)lgI-I0I0=1nlg[P]+lgK+2lgn.
Substituting (4) into (9), the following equation can be obtained:
(10)lgI-I0I0=1nlg[P]+1nlgKa+2lgn.Equation (10) is the FI-CL model for determination of binding parameters of protein with luminol from intercept and slope of lg(I0-I)/I~lg[P] curve.


## 2.1. Reagents

All reagents used were of analytical reagent grade unless otherwise  specified and doubly deionized water was purified in a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) for the preparation of solutions in the whole procedure. Luminol (Fluka, Switzerland), BSA (Sigma), LYS (Sigma), MB (Sigma), and CAT (Sigma) were used as received without further purification. Luminol (2.5 × 10−2 mol L−1) was prepared by dissolving 0.44 g luminol in 100 mL of 0.1 mol L−1 NaOH solution in a brown calibrated flask. BSA, LYS, MB, and CAT (5.0 × 10−5 mol L−1) were prepared in purified water and stored at 4°C.


## 2.2. Apparatus

The FI-CL system used in this work was illustrated schematically in Figure1. The flow system consisted of three lines for delivery protein, luminol/NaOH, and carrier solution. The IFFM-A Luminescence Analyzer (Xi’an Remax Electronic Science and Technology Co., and Ltd., Xi’an, China) contained the sampling system, the photomultiplier tube (PMT), and the PC with an IFFM-A client system (Remax, Xi’an, China). Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tube (1.0 mm i.d.) was used to connect all the components of the flow system. A six-way valve with a loop of 100 μL was used for quantitatively injecting luminol into carrier stream. The CL detector contained a flow cell made by coiling 15 cm of colorless glass tube (1.0 mm i.d.) into a spiral disk shape with a diameter of 2.0 cm and placed close to the PMT. Extreme precautions were taken to ensure that the sample compartment and PMT were light tight. The CL signal produced in flow cell was detected without wavelength discrimination, and the PMT output was recorded by computer with IFFM-E client system. The temperature of the solutions was controlled (T ± 0.1°C) in a water bath.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the present FI-CL system. P: pump; M: mixing tube; V: valve; FC: flow cell; W: waste; PC: personal computer.


## 2.3. General Procedures

The carrier (purified water), the solutions of luminol, and proteins were propelled by peristaltic pumps at a flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1 on each flow line. The whole flow system was washed until a stable baseline was recorded. Then 100 μL of luminol solution was injected into the carrier stream by the six-way valve and merged with proteins. The whole mixed solution was delivered into the flow cell, and the emitted CL was collected by the PMT at a voltage of −700 V and recorded by the computer. The increment of CL intensity (ΔI=I-I0, where I and  I0 were CL signals in the presence and in the absence of proteins) was measured.


## 2.4. Optimization of the Experimental Conditions

The effect of luminol concentration on the CL intensity was examined over the ranges of 5.0 × 10−7 to 5.0 × 10−4 mol L−1. It was found that the maximum CL intensity could be obtained at 2.5 × 10−5 mol L−1 luminol. Therefore, 2.5 × 10−5 mol L−1 luminol was chosen as the optimum concentration and used in subsequent experiments. A series of NaOH solutions with different concentrations ranging from 1.0 × 10−3 to 0.1 mol L−1 were tested, and 2.5 × 10−2 mol L−1 NaOH was used as the optimum concentration. The flow rate and the length of mixing tube had a great effect on the CL intensity. A flow rate of 2.0 mL min−1 and the length of mixing tube of 10.0 cm were selected in this work with good sensitivity, precision, and reproducibility.


## 2.5. The Operational Stability of the FI-CL System

Luminol alkaline solution (100μL) was injected into the flow system in the presence of 2.5 × 10−5 mol L−1 luminol and 5.0 × 10−8 mol L−1  proteins, and the CL intensity was recorded to test the stability of luminol-protein system. This experiment lasted for 3 days, and the flow system was regularly used over 8 hours per day. The results showed that the relative standard deviations were less than 3.0%, so the luminol-protein system exerted good stability.


## 2.6. Constructing the Binding Model of Protein with Luminol

It is known that proteins are biomacromolecules with binding sites for small molecules. Assuming that the number of binding sites of the small molecule luminol(L) to protein (P) is n, each site is independent and has the same intrinsic affinity for the ligand [34, 35]. The protein-luminol complex (PLn) is formed, and the binding process can be expressed as follows:
(1)P+nL⇌KaPLn
or
(2)1nP+L⇌KP1/nL,
where P, L, n, and PLn represent protein, luminol, the number of binding sites, and protein-luminol complex, respectively. The binding constant Ka or K is
(3)Ka=[PLn][P][L]norK=[P1/nL][P]1/n[L],
where [PLn], [P], and [L] represent the concentrations of protein-luminol complex, protein, and luminol at equilibrium state, respectively, and [P1/nL] is the concentration of product for reaction (2).According to chemical reaction equilibrium theory,(4)Ka=Kn,(5)[P1/nL]=1n[P]b=1n2[L]b.The CL intensity of luminol is proportional to its concentration. Equations (6) and (7) can be obtained as
(6)I0∝[L]t,
where I0 is the CL intensity in the absence of protein; [L]t  is the total concentration of luminol as
(7)I-I0∝[L]b,
where I is the CL intensity in the presence of protein; [L]b is the concentration of luminol at equilibrium. Using (6) and (7) in (5) leads to
(8)K=(1/n2)(I-I0)[P]1/nI0.
Taking logarithms of both sides,
(9)lgI-I0I0=1nlg[P]+lgK+2lgn.
Substituting (4) into (9), the following equation can be obtained:
(10)lgI-I0I0=1nlg[P]+1nlgKa+2lgn.Equation (10) is the FI-CL model for determination of binding parameters of protein with luminol from intercept and slope of lg(I0-I)/I~lg[P] curve.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Relative CL Intensity-Time Profiles

The relative CL intensity-time profiles in different CL systems were presented in Figure2. Herein, the concentration of luminol was 2.5 × 10−5 mol L−1, and the concentrations of BSA, LYS, MB, and CAT were 5.0 × 10−8 mol L−1. It can be seen that the maximum CL intensity (Imax) of luminol system (curve 1) is 93 at the time (Tmax) of 3.9 s; the Imax is 144, 152, 221, and 410 at the Tmax of 3.7, 3.4, 3.2, and 2.9 s in the presence of BSA (curve 2), LYS (curve 3), MB (curve 4), and CAT (curve 5), respectively. It can be seen that the CL responses for different proteins in luminol system followed the order of CAT > MB > LYS > BSA.Figure 2
Relative CL intensity-time profile in different CL systems at 298 K. Curve 1: luminol CL system; Curve 2: luminol-BSA CL system; Curve 3: luminol-LYS CL system; Curve 4: luminol-MB CL system; Curve 5: luminol-CAT CL system. Concentration: luminol, 2.5 × 10−5 mol L−1; BSA, LYS, MB, and CAT, 5.0 × 10−8 mol L−1.


### 3.2. Binding Parameters of Protein with Luminol

Under the optimum conditions, a series of standard solutions of protein were analyzed by the FI-CL system. The CL intensity increment from luminol obeys the general equation ofΔI=ACp+B, with the linear equations, linear ranges, and correlative coefficients R at different temperatures (288, 298, and 308 K) listed in Table 1. It can be seen that A varies in the increasing order of  ACAT>AMB>ALYS>ABSA, indicating that the sensitivities of determination follow the sequence CAT > MB > LYS > BSA. According to (10), lg[(I0-I)/I]=1/nlg[P]+1/nlgKa+2lgn, by plotting lg(I0-I)/Iversus lg[P], the binding constants Ka and the number of binding sites n of luminol to CAT, MB, LYS, and BSA were obtained and were given in Table 1. It was clear that the binding constants Ka increase with the increasing of temperature, and the values of Ka were at 105 to 107 levels suggesting that there existed a high binding affinity of proteins with luminol in the sequence of CAT > MB > LYS > BSA. The number of binding sites n of luminol to BSA or LYS was about 2 and to MB or CAT was about 1.Table 1
The linear equations and binding parameters by (10).
Protein
T (K)
Linear equation/R  ΔI=ACp+Ba
Linear range (nmol L−1)
lg(I0-I)/I versus Lg[P]
K
a (L mol−1)
n
BSA
288
Δ
I
=
0
.
18
C
BSA
+
29.91
/
0.99
77
5–250
1.77 × 105
2.23
298
Δ
I
=
0.19
C
BSA
+
32
.
41
/
0.99
63
2.34 × 105
1
.
75
308
Δ
I
=
0.2
1
C
BSA
+
3
5.57
/
0.99
78
2.90 × 105
1.80
LYS
288
Δ
I
=
0.15
C
LYS
+
21.49
/
0.9
990
10–500
1.93 × 105
1.95
298
Δ
I
=
0.21
C
LYS
+
21.43
/
0.9
961
4.26 × 105
1.75
308
Δ
I
=
0
.
48
C
LYS
+
22.02
/
0.9
988
5.59 × 105
1.96
MB
288
Δ
I
=
0
.
19
C
MB
+
3
2.61
/
0.9
963
10–1000
2.12 × 106
1
.
26
298
Δ
I
=
0
.
21
C
MB
+
58.55
/
0.99
66
2.40 × 106
1.35
308
Δ
I
=
0
.
29
C
MB
+
49.22
/
0.99
61
2.93 × 106
0.94
CAT
288
Δ
I
=
4
.
91
C
CAT
+
1
4.85
/
0.99
62
0.1–100
4.38 × 107
1
.
38
298
Δ
I
=
5
.
58
C
CAT
+
15.74
/
0.99
97
4.96 × 107
1
.
36
308
Δ
I
=
6
.
14
C
CAT
+
13.30
/
0.99
96
5.93 × 107
1
.
24
aEach result is the average of seven separate determinations.


### 3.3. The Thermodynamic Parameters of Protein-Luminol Interaction

By the Van’t Hoff equation [36], thermodynamic parameters of BSA, LYS, MB, and CAT with luminol were listed in Table 2. It can be seen that ΔH>0, ΔS>0, and ΔG<0, indicating that the complex formation was a spontaneous and endothermic process with hydrophobic effect as the main binding force. It was also clear that the major contribution for the ΔG comes from ΔS rather than ΔH, suggesting the binding process was entropy-driven. The sequence of binding abilities of different proteins was consistent with the order of the sensitivity of determination: CAT > MB > LYS > BSA, which indicated that the binding of CAT with luminol was much easier than MB, LYS, and BSA.Table 2
Thermodynamic parameters of protein-luminol interaction determined by FI-CL.
Protein
T (K)
Δ
G (kJ mol−1)
Δ
H (kJ mol−1)
Δ
S (J mol−1 K−1)
BSA
288
-
2
8.94
18.10
1
6
3.37
298
-
30.63
308
-
32.20
LYS
288
-
2
9.14
40.68
243.03
298
-
32.11
308
-
33.98
MB
288
-
34.87
12.00
162.62
298
-
36.40
308
-
3
8.13
CAT
288
-
42.13
11.19
185.07
298
-
43.90
308
-
45.83


## 3.1. Relative CL Intensity-Time Profiles

The relative CL intensity-time profiles in different CL systems were presented in Figure2. Herein, the concentration of luminol was 2.5 × 10−5 mol L−1, and the concentrations of BSA, LYS, MB, and CAT were 5.0 × 10−8 mol L−1. It can be seen that the maximum CL intensity (Imax) of luminol system (curve 1) is 93 at the time (Tmax) of 3.9 s; the Imax is 144, 152, 221, and 410 at the Tmax of 3.7, 3.4, 3.2, and 2.9 s in the presence of BSA (curve 2), LYS (curve 3), MB (curve 4), and CAT (curve 5), respectively. It can be seen that the CL responses for different proteins in luminol system followed the order of CAT > MB > LYS > BSA.Figure 2
Relative CL intensity-time profile in different CL systems at 298 K. Curve 1: luminol CL system; Curve 2: luminol-BSA CL system; Curve 3: luminol-LYS CL system; Curve 4: luminol-MB CL system; Curve 5: luminol-CAT CL system. Concentration: luminol, 2.5 × 10−5 mol L−1; BSA, LYS, MB, and CAT, 5.0 × 10−8 mol L−1.


## 3.2. Binding Parameters of Protein with Luminol

Under the optimum conditions, a series of standard solutions of protein were analyzed by the FI-CL system. The CL intensity increment from luminol obeys the general equation ofΔI=ACp+B, with the linear equations, linear ranges, and correlative coefficients R at different temperatures (288, 298, and 308 K) listed in Table 1. It can be seen that A varies in the increasing order of  ACAT>AMB>ALYS>ABSA, indicating that the sensitivities of determination follow the sequence CAT > MB > LYS > BSA. According to (10), lg[(I0-I)/I]=1/nlg[P]+1/nlgKa+2lgn, by plotting lg(I0-I)/Iversus lg[P], the binding constants Ka and the number of binding sites n of luminol to CAT, MB, LYS, and BSA were obtained and were given in Table 1. It was clear that the binding constants Ka increase with the increasing of temperature, and the values of Ka were at 105 to 107 levels suggesting that there existed a high binding affinity of proteins with luminol in the sequence of CAT > MB > LYS > BSA. The number of binding sites n of luminol to BSA or LYS was about 2 and to MB or CAT was about 1.Table 1
The linear equations and binding parameters by (10).
Protein
T (K)
Linear equation/R  ΔI=ACp+Ba
Linear range (nmol L−1)
lg(I0-I)/I versus Lg[P]
K
a (L mol−1)
n
BSA
288
Δ
I
=
0
.
18
C
BSA
+
29.91
/
0.99
77
5–250
1.77 × 105
2.23
298
Δ
I
=
0.19
C
BSA
+
32
.
41
/
0.99
63
2.34 × 105
1
.
75
308
Δ
I
=
0.2
1
C
BSA
+
3
5.57
/
0.99
78
2.90 × 105
1.80
LYS
288
Δ
I
=
0.15
C
LYS
+
21.49
/
0.9
990
10–500
1.93 × 105
1.95
298
Δ
I
=
0.21
C
LYS
+
21.43
/
0.9
961
4.26 × 105
1.75
308
Δ
I
=
0
.
48
C
LYS
+
22.02
/
0.9
988
5.59 × 105
1.96
MB
288
Δ
I
=
0
.
19
C
MB
+
3
2.61
/
0.9
963
10–1000
2.12 × 106
1
.
26
298
Δ
I
=
0
.
21
C
MB
+
58.55
/
0.99
66
2.40 × 106
1.35
308
Δ
I
=
0
.
29
C
MB
+
49.22
/
0.99
61
2.93 × 106
0.94
CAT
288
Δ
I
=
4
.
91
C
CAT
+
1
4.85
/
0.99
62
0.1–100
4.38 × 107
1
.
38
298
Δ
I
=
5
.
58
C
CAT
+
15.74
/
0.99
97
4.96 × 107
1
.
36
308
Δ
I
=
6
.
14
C
CAT
+
13.30
/
0.99
96
5.93 × 107
1
.
24
aEach result is the average of seven separate determinations.


## 3.3. The Thermodynamic Parameters of Protein-Luminol Interaction

By the Van’t Hoff equation [36], thermodynamic parameters of BSA, LYS, MB, and CAT with luminol were listed in Table 2. It can be seen that ΔH>0, ΔS>0, and ΔG<0, indicating that the complex formation was a spontaneous and endothermic process with hydrophobic effect as the main binding force. It was also clear that the major contribution for the ΔG comes from ΔS rather than ΔH, suggesting the binding process was entropy-driven. The sequence of binding abilities of different proteins was consistent with the order of the sensitivity of determination: CAT > MB > LYS > BSA, which indicated that the binding of CAT with luminol was much easier than MB, LYS, and BSA.Table 2
Thermodynamic parameters of protein-luminol interaction determined by FI-CL.
Protein
T (K)
Δ
G (kJ mol−1)
Δ
H (kJ mol−1)
Δ
S (J mol−1 K−1)
BSA
288
-
2
8.94
18.10
1
6
3.37
298
-
30.63
308
-
32.20
LYS
288
-
2
9.14
40.68
243.03
298
-
32.11
308
-
33.98
MB
288
-
34.87
12.00
162.62
298
-
36.40
308
-
3
8.13
CAT
288
-
42.13
11.19
185.07
298
-
43.90
308
-
45.83


## 4. Conclusions

The interaction behavior of BSA, LYS, MB, and CAT with luminol was first studied by FI-CL analysis. By the constructed FI-CL modellg[(I0-I)/I]=1/nlg[P]+1/nlgKa+2lgn, binding constants Ka and the number of binding sites n of protein with luminol were obtained. The results showed that the interaction of protein with luminol was an endothermic, spontaneous, and entropy-driven process mainly via the hydrophobic effect.



---

*Source: 391053-2013-06-20.xml*