# The Application of Traditional Chinese Medicine Injection on Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome during the Perioperative Period of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Authors: Zhaofeng Shi; Chen Zhao; Jiayuan Hu; Qianqian Dai; Manke Guan; Changming Zhong; Guihua Tian; Hongcai Shang
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Introduction. TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue and Yiqihuoxue has been applied as complementary therapies during the perioperative period of PCI for patients with ACS, while the recommended time points and plans of TCMI are still short of the support of evidence-based medicine. Methods. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of TCMI on patients with ACS during the perioperative period of PCI. RCTs were searched based on standardized searching rules in seven medical databases from the inception up to August 2019. Two reviewers conducted the study selection, data extraction, and quality analysis independently. Data were analysed with the support of software RevMan and Stata. Results. A total of 68 articles with 6,043 patients were enrolled. The result of meta-analysis showed that the TCMI combined with western medicine was superior to the western medicine alone on clinical efficiency (before the PCI, before and after the PCI, or overall, P<0.05), the occurrence of MACE (myocardial infarction and stenocardia: before the PCI, before and after the PCI, or overall, P<0.05; arrhythmia: before and after the PCI, P<0.05), and the level of inflammatory factors (hs-CRP: before the PCI, before and after the PCI, or overall, P<0.05; IL-6: after the PCI, P<0.05). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue obtained more support compared with Yiqihuoxue based on the result of meta-analysis. Conclusions. TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue combined with western medicine generally showed the potential advantage on the treatment of ACS during the perioperative period of PCI. However, the optimal time point of intervention and recommended plan based on the effect still needs more clinical evidence. We consider that the research of precise and standardized application of TCMI will be a promising direction for TCM in the future.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), which is caused by rupture or erosion of atherosclerotic plaque in the coronary artery or fresh thrombosis, can be classified as unstable angina (UA), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) based on the electrocardiographic changes and cardiac biomarker [1]. In most developed countries, the incidence of ACS is declining in the past 30 years [2, 3]; however, it is still increasing in China with each passing year and the vast majority of patients with ACS was first diagnosed and received treatment in the emergency department [4]. There are currently 290 million cardiovascular patients in China, and the number of patients with ACS is expected to reach 22.6 million by 2030 [5].The clinical manifestation of ACS patients is variable, with the most common symptom such as chest pain or chest tightness [6]. However, some patients such as elderly women and diabetes may not have typical symptoms. The diagnosis of ACS can be defined as the increase in troponin levels with at least one value > 99th percentile of upper reference limit and plus the at least one part of diagnostic evidence from the symptom of myocardial ischemia, electrocardiograph (ECG), and image finding [7]. The risk stratification for ACS is a prerequisite on the establishment of clinical strategy, which means only by applying an appropriate risk stratification, a preferable therapeutic efficiency can be achieved. Some publications have identified new biomarkers for risk stratification of patients with ACS, including gut-microbiota-dependent trimethylamine N-oxide [8], microRNAs (26b-5, 660-5, and 320a) [9], and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) telomere length in peripheral blood cells [10]. As for the clinical score for risk stratification, the PRECISE-DAPT (dual antiplatelet therapy) [11] and the CRUSADE bleeding score [12] has proved its value on the prediction of the risk of bleeding events; meanwhile, the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score and the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score have identified the effect on the evaluation of ischemia risk [13]. Basic treatments for ACS include dual antiplatelet (such as aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors) [14], anticoagulant (such as fondaparinux and low-molecular-weight heparin) [15], and anti-ischemic (such as beta-blockers) [16] therapies. The treatment of revascularization includes the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), thrombolytic therapy (tissue plasminogen activator), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [17].PCI, which owns the immediate effect on revascularizing the infarct-related arteries (IRA), is being widely applied and dramatically improved the prognosis of ACS [18]. In 2015, more than 567,000 patients registered and finished the PCI in China, ranking the second in the world [19]. It should be noticed that this figure reached 753,142 in 2017 based on the report of China Cardiovascular Intervention Forum (CCIF). However, despite the improvement in antithrombotic technology and innovation of revascularizing strategy, the prognosis of PCI for patients with ACS is still unsatisfactory [20], and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is still at a high level [21]. Some PCI-related problems, such as no-reflow, ischemia-reperfusion injury, perioperative myocardial injury (PMI), in-stent restenosis, and stent thrombosis, are difficult to avoid. In the past 30 years, with the development in clinical trials of TCM in China, it has been found that the traditional Chinese medicine injection (TCMI) has a good effect on treating and preventing arrhythmia and reperfusion injury, improving heart function and protecting myocardium [22]. The Liqihuoxue and Yiqihuoxue are two essential effects of TCMI. According to the theory of TCM, Qi is the most basic substance to constitute and maintain human life activities. The stagnation or deficiency of Qi will induce the blood stasis, which is basically equivalent to endothelial dysfunction (ETDF), forming an essential pathological basis of cardiovascular disease. Liqihuoxue is used in the ACS patients with asthenia syndrome through the function of regulating Qi and removing blood stasis, while Yiqihuoxue is used for the deficiency syndrome through the function of nourishing Qi and removing blood stasis.The application of TCMI combined with western medicine during the perioperative period of PCI has become a hotspot on the treatment of ACS in China, but the optimal time point of intervention is still a matter of debate and the recommended plan from TCMI with the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue is still unknown. Moreover, some clinical centers randomly use the TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue and Yiqihuoxue before or even after PCI. Finding the optimal time point of intervention and providing the therapeutic plan based on the effect of Chinese medicine are necessary for the development of TCM. Given the great variation in previous results, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCMI in the treatment of ACS based on the different time points and the effect of Liqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.


## 2. Methods

This research is based on the guideline of PRISMA [23] and followed the instruction from the Cochrane Reviewer Handbook (version 5.1) [24].


### 2.1. Data Sources and Search Methods

Seven electronic medical databases named PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, the CNKI (Chinese), Wanfang Data (Chinese), and Vip Data (Chinese) were searched from the inception up to August 2019. Articles were included with the language of Chinese or English. The relevant systematic reviews were also temporarily included and analysed for the supplementation of the potentially qualified articles. Emails were sent to authors for the acquirement of the non-full-text articles. The supplemental search was performed in the library of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine and the China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine for the acquisition of grey studies. The searching terms, which were conducted and adjusted for the variation in language, contained as follows: acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, acute myocardial infarction, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina, UA, injection, Chinese patent medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, percutaneous coronary intervention, PCI, and randomized clinical trials.


### 2.2. Eligibility Criteria

The eligibility criteria of inclusion and exclusion were performed by two researchers (MD. Zhaofeng Shi and MM. Qianqian Dai) independently, and the disagreement was resolved by the common discussion or the guidance of the third researcher (Pro. Hongcai Shang).The eligibility criteria of included studies were suited for the following criteria: (1) RCTs; (2) patients who complied with the diagnostic criteria of ACS based on the guideline of ESC for STEMI [25] or UA/NSTEMI [26]; (3) patients of either gender and of any age who received the PCI, including the PTCA and coronary artery stent implantation (such as bare metal stent and drug eluting stent), within 12 hours from the occurrence of symptoms of myocardial ischemia; (4) patients who received the TCMI with the effect of regulating Qi and removing stasis (Liqihuoxue) or nourishing Qi and removing stasis (Yiqihuoxue) based on the guidelines of drug description. TCMI combined with western medicine (dual antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and anti-ischemic) was defined as the experimental group; meanwhile, western medicine alone was as the controlled group; (5) the time point of intervention for TCMI was settled before the PCI (less than 3 hours), after the PCI (more than 3 hours), or before and after the PCI together; (6) the outcome indicators should include at least one of following items: (a) clinical efficiency (including the criteria of complete response, partial response, and invalid response; complete response plus partial response was defined as the total effective response) [27]; (b) MACE (including death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, transient ischemic attack and stroke, heart failure event, percutaneous coronary intervention, peripheral vascular intervention, and stent thrombosis) [28]; (c) inflammatory factors (CRP, hs-CRP, IL-6, IL-10, IL-18, or TNF-α); (d) adverse events resulting from TCMI or western medicine.Studies were excluded if they met one of the following criteria: (1) non-RCTs (including quasi-RCTs, CCTs, cohort study, case series, and case reports); (2) received the traditional Chinese herbal medicine or TCMI in the controlled group; (3) received the unrelated TCMI, which was not focused on the treatment of ACS, or Chinese herbal medicine in the experimental group; (4) the types of diseases were not compatible with the criteria of ACS (STEMI, USTEMI, and UA); and (5) severe clinical illness, including (a) had active bleeding or the tendency of bleeding; (b) cardiogenic shock, cardiac rupture, or ventricular septal perforation; (c) acute pericarditis, subacute infective endocarditis, or aortic dissection; (d) severe arrhythmia (left bundle branch block, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular flutter, and ventricular fibrillation); and (e) serious disease in the liver, kidney, hematopoietic system, or malignant tumours.Particularly, it should be highlighted that STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA had many commonalities in the pathogenesis and pathophysiology, which were related to the formation of atherosclerotic plaque. Although the difference among them was the degree of occlusion of coronary artery (STEMI is more seriously than NSTEMI), the long-term prognosis and the severity were similar and the treatment of PCI was of great significance. As for the classifications of stents in the insertion of vessel stents, even though the BVS (bioresorbable vessel scaffold) was no worse than EES (everolimus-eluting stent) in 1-year TLF (target lesion failure) rate, cardiogenic death, and TLR (target lesion revascularization) induced by target vessel MI and ischemia [29], we did not limit the type of stent in the inclusion criteria of this research in view of the current status of PCI in China. Chinese herbal medicine should not be combined with TCMI, even though they had the synergistic effects without interfering with the major function of TCMI. The dosage of the TCMI and western medicine was discrepant in experimental groups or controlled groups, and there was no limitation for the dosage in the selection of research.


### 2.3. Study Selection

The software namedEndNote X8 was used to establish a preliminary literature database which met the requirements of removing duplicates and screening the procedure of selection. Two researchers (MD. Zhaofeng Shi and Prof. Chen Zhao) did the procedure by reading title and abstract based on the previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After obtaining the full-text papers, the researchers read the inclusion and exclusion criteria once again for further screening. If the information of the included papers was incomplete or difficult to be judged during the process of screening, the original author would be contacted by email. If it was difficult to receive a response from the original author, the missing information would be excluded. The third researcher (Prof. Hongcai Shang) did the judgment after the discussion if there was disagreement during the cross-correction.


### 2.4. Data Extraction and Quality Analysis

Two researchers (MM. Changming Zhong and MD. Zhaofeng Shi) extracted data and established a summary table independently, which contained the following items: (1) the name of author and the year of publication, (2) the researching area, (3) sample size, (4) age of patients, (5) other information (such as the past medical history, personal history, and classification of heart function), (6) treatments of experimental and controlled groups, (7) duration of treatments and follow-up, (8) evaluation of outcome indicators and quality assessment, and (9) adverse events of the TCMI. The results were cross-checked in this process, and any disagreement between the results will be resolved after a discussion and judged by the arbiter (Prof. Hongcai Shang).The quality analysis was performed by two investigators independently (MD. Zhaofeng Shi and MD. Jiayuan Hu), using the tool of the Cochrane Reviewer Handbook 5.1 [24]. This tool was conducted to evaluate the risk bias of included studies across seven domains: (1) random sequence generation (selection bias), (2) allocation concealment (selection bias), (3) blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias), (4) blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias), (5) incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), (6) selective reporting (reporting bias), and (7) other sources of bias (other bias). Researchers would answer these questions with “yes (Y),” “unclear (U),” or “no (N)” to evaluate the degree of risk of bias. If an included research is satisfied with more than four domains, it should be grouped as the low risk of bias; one to four domains should be grouped as the moderate risk of bias; and one or no domain should be grouped as the high risk of bias. The disagreement during this procedure would be resolved after a discussion and judged by the arbiter (Prof. Hongcai Shang). The outcomes above were established as tables and images with the support of software Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.3, the Nordic Cochrane Centre, the Cochrane Collaboration, 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark).


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed by the softwareRevMan and Stata (version 14.0, StataCorp LP, College Station, US). The analysis was conducted after the comparison of outcomes between the experimental and the controlled groups. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for the dichotomous data and the standard mean difference (Std. MD) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% CI was calculated for the continuous data, respectively.Theχ2 test and the I2 statistic were conducted to identify and measure the statistical heterogeneity. These methods could provide an estimate of variation which resulted from heterogeneity. The heterogeneity was divided into three levels based on the I2 statistic outcomes: (1) between 25 and 50% was low, (2) between 50 and 75% was moderate, and (3) above 75% was high. The P value lower than 0.05 and I2 statistic outcome higher than 50% were considered to obtain significant heterogeneity. The heterogeneity source needed to be further explored with the method of subgroup analysis or metaregression analysis. The sample size, research areas, and levels of hospitals were used as the classification for subgroup analysis.A random-effects model which used the method ofDerSimonian–Laird (DS-L) [30] or Inverse Variance (IV) was conducted to pool data based on the moderate or high heterogeneity and a fixed-effects model which used the method of Mantel–Haenszel (M-H) was established to pool data based on the low heterogeneity [31]. The sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the stability of analysis by using different effects model and examining the effects of individual factors on the overall combined effect size. The method of funnel plot and Egger’s test/Begg’s test was used to assess the publication bias by the software RevMan and Stata if an outcome included more than 10 studies [32, 33].


## 2.1. Data Sources and Search Methods

Seven electronic medical databases named PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, the CNKI (Chinese), Wanfang Data (Chinese), and Vip Data (Chinese) were searched from the inception up to August 2019. Articles were included with the language of Chinese or English. The relevant systematic reviews were also temporarily included and analysed for the supplementation of the potentially qualified articles. Emails were sent to authors for the acquirement of the non-full-text articles. The supplemental search was performed in the library of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine and the China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine for the acquisition of grey studies. The searching terms, which were conducted and adjusted for the variation in language, contained as follows: acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, acute myocardial infarction, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina, UA, injection, Chinese patent medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, percutaneous coronary intervention, PCI, and randomized clinical trials.


## 2.2. Eligibility Criteria

The eligibility criteria of inclusion and exclusion were performed by two researchers (MD. Zhaofeng Shi and MM. Qianqian Dai) independently, and the disagreement was resolved by the common discussion or the guidance of the third researcher (Pro. Hongcai Shang).The eligibility criteria of included studies were suited for the following criteria: (1) RCTs; (2) patients who complied with the diagnostic criteria of ACS based on the guideline of ESC for STEMI [25] or UA/NSTEMI [26]; (3) patients of either gender and of any age who received the PCI, including the PTCA and coronary artery stent implantation (such as bare metal stent and drug eluting stent), within 12 hours from the occurrence of symptoms of myocardial ischemia; (4) patients who received the TCMI with the effect of regulating Qi and removing stasis (Liqihuoxue) or nourishing Qi and removing stasis (Yiqihuoxue) based on the guidelines of drug description. TCMI combined with western medicine (dual antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and anti-ischemic) was defined as the experimental group; meanwhile, western medicine alone was as the controlled group; (5) the time point of intervention for TCMI was settled before the PCI (less than 3 hours), after the PCI (more than 3 hours), or before and after the PCI together; (6) the outcome indicators should include at least one of following items: (a) clinical efficiency (including the criteria of complete response, partial response, and invalid response; complete response plus partial response was defined as the total effective response) [27]; (b) MACE (including death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, transient ischemic attack and stroke, heart failure event, percutaneous coronary intervention, peripheral vascular intervention, and stent thrombosis) [28]; (c) inflammatory factors (CRP, hs-CRP, IL-6, IL-10, IL-18, or TNF-α); (d) adverse events resulting from TCMI or western medicine.Studies were excluded if they met one of the following criteria: (1) non-RCTs (including quasi-RCTs, CCTs, cohort study, case series, and case reports); (2) received the traditional Chinese herbal medicine or TCMI in the controlled group; (3) received the unrelated TCMI, which was not focused on the treatment of ACS, or Chinese herbal medicine in the experimental group; (4) the types of diseases were not compatible with the criteria of ACS (STEMI, USTEMI, and UA); and (5) severe clinical illness, including (a) had active bleeding or the tendency of bleeding; (b) cardiogenic shock, cardiac rupture, or ventricular septal perforation; (c) acute pericarditis, subacute infective endocarditis, or aortic dissection; (d) severe arrhythmia (left bundle branch block, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular flutter, and ventricular fibrillation); and (e) serious disease in the liver, kidney, hematopoietic system, or malignant tumours.Particularly, it should be highlighted that STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA had many commonalities in the pathogenesis and pathophysiology, which were related to the formation of atherosclerotic plaque. Although the difference among them was the degree of occlusion of coronary artery (STEMI is more seriously than NSTEMI), the long-term prognosis and the severity were similar and the treatment of PCI was of great significance. As for the classifications of stents in the insertion of vessel stents, even though the BVS (bioresorbable vessel scaffold) was no worse than EES (everolimus-eluting stent) in 1-year TLF (target lesion failure) rate, cardiogenic death, and TLR (target lesion revascularization) induced by target vessel MI and ischemia [29], we did not limit the type of stent in the inclusion criteria of this research in view of the current status of PCI in China. Chinese herbal medicine should not be combined with TCMI, even though they had the synergistic effects without interfering with the major function of TCMI. The dosage of the TCMI and western medicine was discrepant in experimental groups or controlled groups, and there was no limitation for the dosage in the selection of research.


## 2.3. Study Selection

The software namedEndNote X8 was used to establish a preliminary literature database which met the requirements of removing duplicates and screening the procedure of selection. Two researchers (MD. Zhaofeng Shi and Prof. Chen Zhao) did the procedure by reading title and abstract based on the previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After obtaining the full-text papers, the researchers read the inclusion and exclusion criteria once again for further screening. If the information of the included papers was incomplete or difficult to be judged during the process of screening, the original author would be contacted by email. If it was difficult to receive a response from the original author, the missing information would be excluded. The third researcher (Prof. Hongcai Shang) did the judgment after the discussion if there was disagreement during the cross-correction.


## 2.4. Data Extraction and Quality Analysis

Two researchers (MM. Changming Zhong and MD. Zhaofeng Shi) extracted data and established a summary table independently, which contained the following items: (1) the name of author and the year of publication, (2) the researching area, (3) sample size, (4) age of patients, (5) other information (such as the past medical history, personal history, and classification of heart function), (6) treatments of experimental and controlled groups, (7) duration of treatments and follow-up, (8) evaluation of outcome indicators and quality assessment, and (9) adverse events of the TCMI. The results were cross-checked in this process, and any disagreement between the results will be resolved after a discussion and judged by the arbiter (Prof. Hongcai Shang).The quality analysis was performed by two investigators independently (MD. Zhaofeng Shi and MD. Jiayuan Hu), using the tool of the Cochrane Reviewer Handbook 5.1 [24]. This tool was conducted to evaluate the risk bias of included studies across seven domains: (1) random sequence generation (selection bias), (2) allocation concealment (selection bias), (3) blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias), (4) blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias), (5) incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), (6) selective reporting (reporting bias), and (7) other sources of bias (other bias). Researchers would answer these questions with “yes (Y),” “unclear (U),” or “no (N)” to evaluate the degree of risk of bias. If an included research is satisfied with more than four domains, it should be grouped as the low risk of bias; one to four domains should be grouped as the moderate risk of bias; and one or no domain should be grouped as the high risk of bias. The disagreement during this procedure would be resolved after a discussion and judged by the arbiter (Prof. Hongcai Shang). The outcomes above were established as tables and images with the support of software Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.3, the Nordic Cochrane Centre, the Cochrane Collaboration, 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark).


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed by the softwareRevMan and Stata (version 14.0, StataCorp LP, College Station, US). The analysis was conducted after the comparison of outcomes between the experimental and the controlled groups. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for the dichotomous data and the standard mean difference (Std. MD) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% CI was calculated for the continuous data, respectively.Theχ2 test and the I2 statistic were conducted to identify and measure the statistical heterogeneity. These methods could provide an estimate of variation which resulted from heterogeneity. The heterogeneity was divided into three levels based on the I2 statistic outcomes: (1) between 25 and 50% was low, (2) between 50 and 75% was moderate, and (3) above 75% was high. The P value lower than 0.05 and I2 statistic outcome higher than 50% were considered to obtain significant heterogeneity. The heterogeneity source needed to be further explored with the method of subgroup analysis or metaregression analysis. The sample size, research areas, and levels of hospitals were used as the classification for subgroup analysis.A random-effects model which used the method ofDerSimonian–Laird (DS-L) [30] or Inverse Variance (IV) was conducted to pool data based on the moderate or high heterogeneity and a fixed-effects model which used the method of Mantel–Haenszel (M-H) was established to pool data based on the low heterogeneity [31]. The sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the stability of analysis by using different effects model and examining the effects of individual factors on the overall combined effect size. The method of funnel plot and Egger’s test/Begg’s test was used to assess the publication bias by the software RevMan and Stata if an outcome included more than 10 studies [32, 33].


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Study Selection

The flow diagram of the screening and selection of potential articles was illustrated in Figure1. A total of 579 related studies were identified from the medical databases, and 342 studies were ruled out due to the duplication. After the screening of the title and abstract, one hundred and forty-two studies were further excluded for the following reasons: (1) twenty-eight were experimental studies, (2) sixty-six clinical studies did not belong to RCTs, (3) fifteen studies belonged to reviews or meta-analyses, (4) twenty-two studies were protocols, and (5) eleven studies could not obtain the full-text paper. There were 27 studies excluded after the full-text paper reading for the following reasons: (1) the experimental group was not eligible for 6 studies, (2) the controlled group was not eligible for 2 studies, (3) insufficient data were found in 7 studies, and (4) twelve studies had inappropriate criteria for the indicators of outcome. Overall, a total of 68 articles with 6,043 patients were enrolled in this research.Figure 1
The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.


### 3.2. Study Characteristics

A total of 68 studies conformed to the final eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis (Table1). All studies were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and fifteen trials among them were multicentred studies, which performed in different hospitals of China [34, 48, 49, 51, 55, 58, 59, 61, 66, 82, 88, 94, 95, 100, 101]. The publishing year of studies was found between 2004 and 2018. The sample size of studies ranged from 38 [46] to 203 [65], and the age range of male and female was between 31 [37] and 84 [41] years old. As for the classification of ACS, only twenty-one studies clearly defined including seven studies for UA [36, 73, 74, 78, 80, 86], eleven studies for STEMI [42, 45, 46, 49, 51, 66, 70, 71, 91, 92, 95], and three for NSTEMI [52, 72, 75]. However, the rest of forty-eight studies did not introduce the classification. The types of TCMI in the experimental group were diversified and listed as follows: injection of Dazhuhongjingtian [34–38], Shuxuetong [39, 42, 83–89], Shenmai [40–44, 46–48], Danshen [45, 49], Danhong [50–67, 73, 74], Dengzhanhuasu [68], Gualoupi [69], Guanxinning [70, 71], Safflower yellow [72, 75], Safflower [76–78], Kudiezi [79], Shengmai [80–82], Xiangdan [90], Xuesaitong [91–95], Xueshuantong [96–100], and Yiqifumai [101]. The detailed information of TCMI, which included constituents of TCMI, Latin names of constituents for Chinese medicine, ratios of constituents, specifications clinical use of the TCMI, and Chinese national medicine permission numbers, was well illustrated (see Table S2 and Figures S13–S28 in the Supplementary Materials). The western medicine contained the anticoagulant, antimyocardial ischemia, antiplatelet, lipid-lowering, and antihypertensive treatment. As for the duration of therapy, all included studies except seven [56, 71, 72, 78, 80, 81, 100] clearly reported. The time of follow-up was mentioned in fifteen included studies [43, 44, 46, 48, 51, 53, 58, 71, 75, 76, 79, 95, 97, 99, 100]. It needs to highlight that only fourteen included studies [37, 41–43, 46, 50, 51, 57, 59, 60, 62, 91, 92, 95] reported the adverse events, which focused on the bleeding event, gastrointestinal reaction, and arrhythmia.Table 1
The characteristics of included studies.
ArticleAreaClassification of diseaseSample size (male/female)Age (years, average age: mean ± SD or mean)Other information of baseline characteristicsExperimental group (E)Controlled group (C)Duration of treatment and follow-upOutcome evaluation and quality assessmentAdverse event(1) Hongtao and Yuan [34]Henan Province; China;multicentersAMI80 (48/32)E: 43 to 61; 51.4 ± 5.1C: 42 to 59; 49. 3 ± 4.6NYHA:E/C: I: 13/14, II: 12/13, III: 8/8, IV: 7/5Injection ofDazhuhongjingtian combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)Four weeks; Six months(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (MPO, hs-CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α)(3) Color Doppler ultrasound (LVEDD and LVESD)(4) Indexes of markers of myocardial injury (BNP, cTnT, and CK-MB)(5) MACE(2) Jia and Jun [35]Jiangsu Province; China; single centerACS80 (48/32)40 to 83; 63.11NRInjection ofDazhuhongjingtian combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)Three to seven days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Laboratory indexes (CK-MB, LDH, and AST)(3) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, SOD, NO, and CRP)(3) Huirong et al. [36]Hebei Province; China; single centerUA64 (31/33)E: 50 to 72; 60.39 ± 7.79C: 51 to 70; 58.9 ± 7.45BMI:E/C: (25.87 ± 3.29)/(26.62 ± 3.16)Injection ofDazhuhongjingtian combined with ①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 32, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 32, after the PCI)Fourteen days;NRLaboratory indexes (MCP-1 and hs-CRP)NR(4) Yushan et al. [37]Henan Province; China; single centerAMI82 (52/30)31 to 72; 51.3 ± 27.3NRInjection ofDazhuhongjingtian combined with ①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 42, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)Fourteen days;NRLaboratory indexes (ET, hs-CRP, Fb, and blood lipid)I(5) Xin [38]Jiangsu Province; China; single centerACS40 (30/10)E: 61.05 ± 9.62C: 63.35 ± 10.67NRInjection ofDazhuhongjingtian combined with ①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 20, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 20, after the PCI)Five to seven days;NR(1) Indexes of markers of myocardial injury (CK-MB, LDH, and cTnT)NR(2) Blood biochemical examination(3) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, SOD, and CRP)(6) Lanrong [39]Hebei Province; China; single centerAMI100 (58/42)E: 50 to 72C: 50 to 75NRInjection ofShuxuetong and Shenmai combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)One week;NR(1) hs-CRPNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound (LA, LVEDD, LVESD, and VEF%)(3) MACE(7) Fengmei et al. [40]Zhejiang Province; China; single centerAMI67 (52/15)E: 65.9 ± 10.4C: 66.2 ± 11.1Combined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 22/23; diabetes: 17/13; hyperlipidemia: 5/7Injection ofShenmai combined with ①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 35, before and after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 32, before and after the PCI)Seven days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Laboratory indexes (apelin-13 and NO)(8) Lin et al. [41]Liaoning Province; China; single centerACS74 (35/39)35 to 84; 59.22 ± 7.03NRInjection ofShenmai combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 37, after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 37, after the PCI)Eight weeks;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyI; II; III; IV; IX(2) Laboratory index(3) ECG(4) Adverse events(9) Zhaoxia [42]Hebei Province; China; single centerSTEMI100 (55/45)E: 69. 0 ± 7.6C: 68.2 ± 7.1HYHA: E/C: I: 22/24; II: 28/26Site of MI: E/C: anterior wall and extensive anterior wall: 28/26; inferior wall: 14/15; high lateral: 8/9.Injection ofShuxuetong and Shenmai combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)One week;NR(1) Laboratory indexes (hs-CRP, SOD, and MDA)III; IV(2) Color Doppler ultrasound (LVEF and size of MI)(3) MACE(10) Lilan and Xiaoxiao [43]Zhejiang Province; China; single centerAMI100 (61/39)E: 45 to 78, 58.41 ± 12.39C: 43 to 78, 57.68 ± 12.03NRInjection ofShenmai combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)Seven days; one to six months(1) Color Doppler ultrasoundIII; IV(2) Indexes of markers of myocardial injury (CK-MB, BNP, and cTnT)(3) Adverse events(11) Hua et al. [44]Anhui Province; China; single centerAMI92 (58/34)E: 62.72 ± 12.12C: 61.27 ± 10.84Combined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 19/21; diabetes: 12/13; smoke: 17/21; alcohol consumption: 14/12.Injection ofShenmai combined with ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 46, before and after the PCI)②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 46, before and after the PCI)Seven days; three months(1) Blood biochemical examinationNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound(3) MACE(12) Peng et al. [45]Jiangsu Province; China; single centerSTEMI120 (104/16)E1: 47 to 75, 61.2 ± 9.8E2: 45 to 75, 61.9 ± 10.1E3: 48 to 75, 59.7 ± 8.5C: 47 to 75, 59.7 ± 8.1NRE1:Salvianolate injection combined with ①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)E2: Shenmai injection combined with ①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)E3: Salvianolate injection and Shenmai injection combined with ①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)Seven days; NR(1) LVEFNR(2) Nt-proBNP(3) hs-CRP(4) Adverse events(13) Caiyan et al. [46]Zhejiang Province; China; single centerSTEMI38 (23/15)43 to 77, 63.83 ± 8.3NRShenmai injection combined with ①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 19, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 19, after the PCI)Two weeks; twenty-two weeks(1) Plasma aldosteroneIII; IV; V(2) Color Doppler ultrasound(3) Adverse events(14) Min et al. [47]Zhejiang Province; China; single centerAMI68 (NR)NRNRShenmai injection combined with conventional western medicine (NR) (n = 34, after the PCI)Conventional western medicine (NR) (n = 34, after the PCI)One week;NRIndexes of inflammatory cytokines (NO, ET, SOD, hs-CRP, CD62P, and CD63)NR(15) Rong et al. [48]Liaoning Province; China; multicentersAMI56 (35/21)E: 47 to 68, 56.7 ± 10.2C: 46 to 67, 55.9 ± 11NRShenmai injection combined with ①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 26, before and after the PCI)Two weeks; four weeks(1) Color Doppler ultrasoundNR(2) Clinical events(16) Faming et al. [49]Shandong Province; China; multicentersSTEMI98 (65/33)E: 64.28 ± 12.28C: 63.96 ± 12.25Killip classification: E/C: I: 38/39, II: 5/4, III: 1/2, and IV: 1.Compound Salvia miltiorrhiza injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 49, before and after PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 49, before and after PCI)17 days;NRMACENR(17) Yonghao et al. [50]Guangdong Province; China; single centerACS60 (34/26)E: 30 to 78, 49.45 ± 11.03C: 30 to 76, 48.63 ± 10.49Combined diseases and personal history: E/C: diabetes: 8/7; hypertension: 6/7; smoke: 13/11; hyperlipidemia: 3/5Danhong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)Two weeks; NR(1) Indexes of markers of myocardial injuryNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound (LVEF and LVED)(3) MACE(18) Guangwei et al. [51]Shaanxi Province; China; multicentersSTEMI120 (74/46)E: 58 to 80, 65.13 ± 2.38C: 56 to 78, 64.38 ± 2.12NRDanhong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)Fourteen days; six months(1) Clinical efficiencyII; VI(2) Indexes of IL-6 and IL-17(3) LVEF(4) MACE(5) Adverse events(19) Zhiqiang et al. [52]Henan Province; China; single centerNSTEMI180 (NR)NRNRDanhong injection combined with ② treatment (n = 90, after the PCI)② treatment (n = 90, after the PCI)14 days;NR(1) Indexes of hs-CRP and ETNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound (cardiac function)(3) Clinical efficiency(20) Weiwei et al. [53]Shandong Province; China; single centerACS100 (67/33)E: 61 to 80, 71.26 ± 4.82C: 61 to 79, 68.28 ± 4.88NRDanhong injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, after the PCI)Two weeks;Two months(1) Vascular endothelial functionNR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, MMP-9, and hs-CRP)(21) Mengzhao [54]Guangxi Province; China; single centerAMI100 (63/37)35 to 70, 52.87 ± 9.03NRDanhong injection combined with ⑥ (n = 52, after PCI)⑥ (n = 52, after PCI)Three days after the PCI;NR(1) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP, and IL-10)NR(2) Laboratory indexes (MMP-9 and BNP)(3) Color Doppler ultrasound(22) Yang [55]Hebei Province; China; multicentersACS104 (55/49)E: 47 to 74, 58.73 ± 8.45C: 48 to 72, 59.21 ± 8.57NRDanhong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 52, after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 52, after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) Vascular endothelial functionNR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (pentraxin-3, IL-18, IL-10, and LpPLA2)(3) Color Doppler ultrasound(23) Min et al. [56]Hebei Province; China; single centerAMI120 (75/45)E: 51 to 74, 62.23 ± 11.26C: 51 to 77, 64.56 ± 12.85NRDanhong injection combined with ② treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)② treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)NR(1) CRPNR(2) Rate of no-reflow(24) Xinmin et al. [57]Shanghai city; China; single centerAMI71 (49/22)48 to 81, 64 ± 12NRDanhong injection combined with conventional western medical treatment (n = 36, after the PCI)Conventional western medical treatment (n = 35, after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyVII; VI(2) MACE(3) LVEF(4) Adverse events(25) Jianfeng et al. [58]Zhejiang Province; China; multicentersACS125 (69/56)E: 55 to 79, 62.1 ± 10.6C: 53 to 76, 61.5 ± 10.3Classification of ACSE/C: AMI: 36/35; UA: 27/27.Danhong injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 63, before and after the PCI surgery)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 62, before and after the PCI surgery)Two weeks;Two months(1) Vascular endothelial functionNR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, and CRP)(3) MACE(26) Yinghua and Lin [59]Tianjing city; China; multicentersAMI180 (106/47)E: 57 to 79, 72.1 ± 6.5C: 55 to 80, 72.3 ± 5.8NRDanhong injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 90, after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 90, after the PCI)Ten days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyI(2) Level of SOD and hs-CRP(3) Adverse events(27) Yongxiang and Qiang [60]Henan Province; China; single centerACS68 (41/27)E: 55.7 ± 7.4C: 54.5 ± 8.2BMI: E/C: (20.6 ± 2.1)/(21.5 ± 1.6)Danhong injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 34, after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 34, after the PCI)10 days;NR(1) Falling rate of ST-segmentI(2) Adverse events(28) Xiaonan et al. [61]Tianjing city; China; multicentersAMI60 (39/21)NRNRDanhong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) Cardiac arrhythmia before and after the PCINR(2) CK-MB(3) Scattering parameters(29) Beixin and Shan [62]Liaoning Province; China; single centerACS70 (37/33)33 to 75, 54.5 ± 10.9NRDanhong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 36, after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 36, after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) hs-CRP and ET-1I; VI(2) Adverse events(30) Hong et al. [63]Hebei Province; China; single centerAMI59 (43/16)E: 55 to 71, 61.9 ± 5.2C: 54 to 71, 65.2 ± 4.5Combined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 28/29; diabetes: 16/23; hyperlipidemia: 26/24.Danhong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 29, before and after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) hs-CRPNR(2) Falling rate of ST-segment(31) Yong et al. [64]Hunan Province; China; single centerACS42 (27/15)E: 70.6 ± 5.4C: 69.1 ± 6.0Classification of ACS: E/C: AMI: 6/5; UA: 15/16Danhong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 21, after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 21, after the PCI)Fourteen days; NRIndexes of platelet activation (CD62P and CD63)NR(32) Zhihui et al. [65]Jilin Province; China; single centerAMI203 (111/92)E: 39 to 79, 71.6 ± 8.6C: 49 to 75, 70.1 ± 8.1Combined diseases: E/C: AMI: 31/26; diabetes: 30/29; hypertension: 35/27Danhong injection combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 116, after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 87, after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Indexes of coagulation function(3) Color Doppler ultrasound(4) TIMI(33) Xiaodong et al. [66]Beijing city; China; multicentersSTEMI61 (38/23)E: 60.1 ± 10.6C: 59.8 ± 7.6NRDanhong injection combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 31, before and after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) ECGNR(2) Symptom of MI(3) CRP(34) Kai et al. [67]Shanghai city; China; single centerACS91 (66/25)E: 65.6 ± 17.3C: 67.2 ± 16.2Classification of ACS: E/C: UA: 23/23; STEMI: 14/13; NSTEMI: 8/10.Danhong injection combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 46, before and after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 45, before and after the PCI)Four weeks;NR(1) Lipid levelsNR(2) hs-CRP(3) MACE(35) Fan and Shayi [68]Guangxi Province; China; single centerACS67 (NR)NRCombined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 25/21; hyperlipidemia: 19/16; diabetes: 10/8Dengzhanhuasu injection combined with ①, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 37, before and after the PCI)①, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)One week; NR(1) HemorrheologyNR(2) Braunwald classification of angina pectoris(3) MACE(36) Yuting and Zheng [69]Neimenggu Province; China; single centerACS56 (NR)E: 67.8 ± 9.3C: 65.6 ± 0.1Combined diseases and personal history: E/C: smoke: 64.2%/21.4%; diabetes: 21.4%/25%Gualoupi injection combined with ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 28 after the PCI)②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 28 after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) Vascular endothelial functionNR(2) Platelet function(37) Hong et al. [70]Hebei Province; China; single centerSTEMI98 (52/46)E: 35 to 71, 55 ± 4C: 34 to 71, 56 ± 5Killip classification: E/C: I: 44/45; II: 4/5Guanxinning injection combined with ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 48 after the PCI surgery)②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 50 after the PCI surgery)Ten days;NR(1) Color Doppler ultrasoundNR(38) Hong et al. [71]Hebei Province; China; single centerSTEMI86 (56/30)34 to 72NRGuanxinning injection combined with ②, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 42 after the PCI)②, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 44 after the PCI)NR;Three months(1) LVEFNR(2) MACE(39) Rui et al. [72]Shaanxi Province; China; single centerUA60 (41/19)E: 63.5 ± 11.2C: 61.3 ± 13.7Combined diseases and personal history: E/C: hypertension: 11/9; diabetes: 9/12; smoke: 17/13Safflower yellow injection combined with ②, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30 before the PCI)②, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30 before the PCI)NR(1) Myocardial injury markersNR(40) Weiwei et al. [73]Beijing city; China; single centerUA100 (70/30)42 to 77, 58 ± 9.2NRDanhong injection combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)Seven days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Laboratory indexes (IL-6, cTNT, and hs-CRP)(41) Chuntao and Lihua [74]Shaanxi Province; China; single centerUA180 (102/78)E: 45 to 76, 62.38 ± 7.14C: 46 to 78, 62.53 ± 7.48Combined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 40/47; hyperlipidemia: 28/28; diabetes: 22/13Danhong injection combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 90, before and after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 90, before and after the PCI)Two weeks; NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Vascular endothelial function (NO, ET-1, vWF, and FMD)(42) Yunshu et al. [75]Jilin Province; China; single centerNSTEMI100 (61/39)More than 65 years oldNRSafflower yellow injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)Ten to fourteen days; thirty days(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Laboratory indexes(3) Adverse events(4) Bleeding events(43) Dingxue and Wenbao [76]Shaanxi province; China; single centerACS88 (33/53)44 to 85, 68.1 ± 8.5The area of infraction: anterior wall: infarction: 6, extensive anterior wall infarction: 24; lateral wall infarction: 28; inferior and posterior wall infarction: 20Safflower injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 44, after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 44, after the PCI)Fourteen days;Four weeks(1) Color Doppler ultrasoundNR(2) MACE(44) Xian et al. [77]Shanghai city; China; single centerACS88 (51/37)E: 45 to 83, 63.5;C: 51 to 82, 64.5Classification: E/C: UA: 30/28; NSTEMI: 14/12Safflower injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 44, before and after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 44, before and after the PCI)Seven days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Laboratory indexes (CRP and TnI)(45) Suyun et al. [78]Hebei Province; China; single centerUA102 (62/40)E: 54.4 ± 8.6C: 56.6 ± 7.4NRSafflower injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 51, before the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 51, before the PCI)NR(1) ECG (ST-segment)NR(2) Vascular endothelial function (NO and ET-1)(3) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α)(46) Yujuan and Maiti [79]Xinjiang Province; China; single centerAMI124 (73/51)E: 58.4 ± 9.6C:57.6 ± 10.1Infarction relate artery: E/C: center anterior descending branch: 32/30; center circumflex branch: 10/11; right coronary artery: 20/21.Kudiezi injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 62, before and after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 62, before and after the PCI)Two weeksSix months(1) ECGNR(2) MACE(3) Laboratory indexes (CK-MB, cTnI, and ET-1)(47) Yuefan et al. [80]Shandong Province; China; single centerUA81 (NR)E: 68.7 ± 10C: 68.1 ± 9.1Personal history and combined diseases: E/C: smoke: 24/23; hypertension: 29/30; diabetes: 8/7Shengmai injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 41, after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 41, after the PCI)NR(1) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and TNF-α)NR(48) Yinghui [81]Sichuan Province; China; single centerACS120 (67/53)E: 34 to 65, 41 ± 1.2C: 35 to 63, 42 ± 1.4Combined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 58.33%/61.67%, diabetes: 33.3%/31.67%; family history of coronary heart disease: 6.67%/8.33%Shengmai injection combined with ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)NR(1) Blood lipid levelNR(2) The score of PL, AS, and AF(3) The score SL and LP(4) Color Doppler ultrasound(5) Blood platelets(49) Xuan et al. [82]Beijing city; China; multicentersAMI62 (35/27)E: 36 to 89, 58 ± 14.9C: 43 to 85, 54.9 ± 15.2Combined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 24/22; diabetes: 10/7; dyslipidemia: 9/6; stroke: 3/3Shengmai injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 32, before and after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)Seven days;NR(1) TIMINr(2) Color Doppler ultrasound(3) Laboratory indexes(4) MACE(50) Zhe et al. [83]Shandong Province; China; single centerAMI90 (49/41)E: 61.1 ± 5.3;C: 61.0 ± 5.3Combined diseases: E/C: hyperlipidemia: 17/15; hypertension: 22/23; diabetes: 6/7NYHA: E/C: II: 30/32; III: 15/13.Shuxuetong injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 45, before and after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 45, before and after the PCI)Ten days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound (LVMI, LVPWT, LVEDD, and LVEF)(3) Laboratory indexes (CK-MB and cTnI)(4) MACE(51) Xiaoyan [84]Shaanxi Province; China; single centerAMI60 (35/25)E: 64 to 89, 73.5 ± 6.6)C: 63 to 88, 73.1 ± 6.5Course of diseases: E/C: (4.3 ± 1.2)/(4.2 ± 1.1) yearsShuxuetong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)One week;NR(1) HemorheologyNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound(3). MACE(52) Zhenda et al. [85]Guangdong Province; China; single centerAMI40 (NR)E: 64.2 ± 8.0D: 63.5 ± 11.0Combined diseases: E/C: diabetes: 24.2%/23.6%; hypertension: 72.7%/71.5%Shuxuetong injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 20, after the PCI surgery)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 20, after the PCI surgery)Two weeks; NR(1) Color Doppler ultrasoundNR(2) Laboratory indexes(3) Adverse events(4) MACE(53) Xuguang and Rong [86]Neimenggu Province; China; single centerUA96 (52/44)E: 42 to 72, 62.5 ± 10.1C: 45 to 72, 61.6 ± 11.3Course of disease: E/C: (7.2 ± 3.6)/(7.7 ± 3.8) yearsShuxuetong injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, before the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, before the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) Blood lipid levelNR(2) Coagulation function(3) MACE(54) Tiezhou and Jie [87]Jiangsu Province; China; single centerAMI120 (82/38)E: 40 to 84, 68.5 ± 8.5C: 38 to 88, 67.5 ± 7.5NRShuxuetong injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) ECG(55) Yushuang et al. [88]Jilin Province; China; multicentersAMI60 (31/29)43 to 71, 57.8 ± 13.1NRShuxuetong injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)Three days;NR(1) SICAM-1NR(56) Jingchun et al. [89]Jiangxi Province; China; single centerACS84 (54/30)E: 54 to 82, 58 ± 4C: 52 to 78, 56 ± 4NRShuxuetong injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 34, after the PCI)One week;NR(1) Vascular endothelial functionNR(2) MACE(57) Jianping et al. [90]Guangdong Province; China; single centerAMI60 (38/22)E: 48 to 68, 53C: 51 to 65, 59.3Combined diseases: E/C: arrhythmia: 4/5; cardiogenic shock: 5/4; heart failure: 3/2.Xiangdan injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)Seven days;NRClinical efficiencyNR(58) Huajin et al. [91]Shanghai city; China; single centerSTEMI120 (73/47)E: 40 to 72;C: 39 to 73Combined diseases: E/C: diabetes: 14/15; hypertension: 25/26; hyperlipidemia: 21/19Xuesaitong injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, before and after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, before and after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) TIMIIV; V; VIII(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and PTX-3)(3) Color Doppler ultrasound(4) Adverse events(59) Lianren [92]Shandong Province; China; single centerSTEMI104 (59/45)E: 23 to 78, 56.71 ± 6.25C: 21 to 80, 57.29 ± 6.61Combined diseases: E/C: diabetes: 13/11; hypertension: 29/30; hyperlipidemia: 22/23.Xuesaitong injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 52, before and after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 52, before and after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) TIMII; IV; VIII; IX; IX(2) Color Doppler ultrasound(3) Adverse events(60) Danzhen and Lingfei [93]Zhejiang Province; China; single centerAMI107 (64/43)E: 51.9 ± 8.4C: 52.3 ± 8.2NRXuesaitong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 52, before and after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 52, before and after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) ECGNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound(3) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (sLoX-1, hs-CRP, and TNF-α)(4) Blood stasis syndrome score(5) MACE(61) Zhili et al. [94]Heilongjiang Province; China; multicentersAMI80 (46/34)E: 62.1 ± 7.9C: 63.5 ± 7.8NRXuesaitong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 40, before and after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 40, before and after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) Laboratory indexes (BNP and MMP-2)NR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and IL-6)(62) Lijun et al. [95]Shandong Province; China; multicentersSTEMI39 (23/16)E: 57.6 ± 10.2C: 55.4 ± 9.8Combined diseases and personal history: E/C: diabetes: 8/6; hypertension: 8/6; smoke: 9/8Xuesaitong injection combined with conventional western medical treatment (NR) (n = 20, after the PCI)Conventional western medical treatment (NR) (n = 19, after the PCI)Two days;Six months(1) TIMII(2) ECG (ST-segment)(3) Adverse events(4) MACE(63) Zhongchun et al. [96]Hunan Province; China; single centerACS92 (56/36)E: 52.97 ± 10.42C: 53.38 ± 9.46Combined diseases and personal history: E/C: hypertension: 16/18; smoke: 21/20Xueshuantong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 46, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 46, after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) Blood lipid levelNR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and TNF-α)(3) ET-1(4) MACE(64) Yingxin et al. [97]Guangdong Province; China; single centerAMI68 (37/31)E: 60.23 ± 7.98C: 59.84 ± 8.27NRXueshuantong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 34, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 34, after the PCI)Three weeks;Twelve months(1) Blood lipid levelNR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP, TNF-α, and NT-proBNP)(3) Color Doppler ultrasound(4) Rehabilitation results (QoF and Barthel score)(5) MACE(65) Ni [98]Shaanxi Province; China; single centerACS114 (71/43)E: 47 to 78, 55.8 ± 4.4C: 49 to 76, 55.4 ± 4.2Classification of disease: E/C: AMI: 27/27; UA: 30/30Xueshuantong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 57, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 57, after the PCI)One month;NR(1) Blood lipid levelNE(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and IL-6)(3) MACE(66) Yiguang et al. [99]Beijing city; China; single centerACS64 (37/27)E: 28 to 69, 55.68 ± 5.9C: 26 to 68, 55.41 ± 5.63Classification of disease: E/C: AMI: 14/13; UA: 19/17Xueshuantong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 32, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 32, after the PCI)Fourteen to twenty-one days;One month(1) Myocardial microcirculation perfusionNR(2) Blood lipid level(3) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and IL-6)(4) Vascular endothelial functions (ET, Fg, and vWF)(5) MACE(67) Caihong and Jiuxi [100]Henan Province; China; multicentersACS80 (47/33)E: 55.7 ± 5.7C: 55.4 ± 4.4Classification of disease: E/C: AMI: 17/16; UA: 23/26Xueshuantong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)NR;One month(1) Myocardial microcirculation perfusionNR(2) Blood lipid level(3) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and IL-6)(4) Vascular endothelial functions (ET, Fg, and vWF)(5) MACE(68) Hongyu and Lan [101]Hebei Province; China; multicentersAMI80 (47/33)E: 34 to 72, 52.6 ± 10.3C: 38 to 74, 53.4 ± 11.2NRYiqifumai injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)Seven days;NR(1) Scores of TCM symptomsNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasoundNotes. AMI: acute myocardial infarction; E: experimental group; C: control group; NYHA: New York Heart Association; NR: not report; BMI: body mass index; MI: myocardial infarction; CRP: C-reactive protein; LVEF: center ventricular ejection fraction; TIMI: thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; ①: lipid lowering; ②: anticoagulant; ③: antiplatelet; ④: antihypertensive; ⑤: antimyocardial ischemia; ⑥: nitroglycerin injection; I: bleeding events; II: abnormal renal function; IV: angina pectoris or myocardial infarction; III: arrhythmia; V: heart failure; VI: allergy; VII: headache; IX: abnormal digestive system; VIII: dizziness; IX: respiratory system disfunction.


### 3.3. Quality Analysis

For the included studies, twenty-two [42, 47, 50, 51, 54, 55, 57, 60, 62, 63, 72, 73, 76, 81, 83–85, 91, 92, 96, 97, 100] mentioned the random sequence generation. No study clearly illustrated or contained the allocation concealment. Only 2 studies [74, 76] introduced the blinding method, which was the sealed envelope method. As for the aspect of incomplete outcome data, no included studies had the attrition bias basically. Only 6 studies [48, 78, 87–90] had the question of existing of other biases (see Figures S1 and S2 and Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials).


### 3.4. Meta-Analysis

#### 3.4.1. Clinical Efficiency

Figure2 illustrates the clinical efficiency of TCMI based on the effect of Yiqihuoxue or Liqihuoxue and the time points of intervention. There were 15 articles including 3,332 participants analysed in the forest plot [34, 35, 40, 41, 51–53, 59, 65, 74, 75, 77, 83, 87, 90]. We extracted 8 articles [34, 35, 41, 51, 52, 59, 65, 87] (2,090 participants) from the 15 studies to compare with the rest of 7 articles [40, 53, 74, 75, 77, 83, 90] (1,242 patients) based on the different time points of intervention during the perioperative period of PCI. The result showed that the clinical efficiency of TCMI combined with the western medicine (experimental group) was superior to the western medicine alone (controlled group) on patients with ACS (before the PCI: RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.20, P<0.01; before and after PCI: RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.34, P<0.01; overall: RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.23, P<0.01). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [34, 35, 51–53, 59, 65, 74, 75, 77, 83, 87] combined with western medicine was superior to the western medicine in the time points of before and after the PCI and after the PCI. The results of the clinical efficiency between the experimental group and the controlled group had statistical difference. The heterogeneity was small (before the PCI: P=0.33, I2 = 12%; before and after the PCI: P=0.79, I2 = 0%; overall: P=0.13, I2 = 13%), and the fixed-effects model was performed to calculate combined data by the M-H test. However, the results could not recommend the best time point of intervention for TCMI on ACS.Figure 2
Forest plot of clinical efficiency of TCMI based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue. Note. represents the TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue;  represents the TCMI with the effect of Yiqihuoxue.


#### 3.4.2. MACE

Figures3–6 illustrate the MACE of patients with ACS after the treatment of experimental group and controlled group based on the effect of Liqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue and the time point of intervention.Figure 3
Forest plot of all-cause mortality based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.Figure 4
Forest plot of myocardial infarction based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.Figure 5
Forest plot of stenocardia based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.Figure 6
Forest plot of arrhythmia based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.(1) All-Cause Mortality. There were 6 articles including 508 participants analysed the all-cause mortality in the forest plot [49, 57, 71, 76, 83, 84] (Figure 3). Three articles [49, 83, 84] with 250 participants received the treatment before and after the PCI compared with the rest of 3 articles [57, 71, 76] with 258 patients received the treatment after the PCI. The meta-analysis showed that the occurrence of all-cause mortality of the experimental group after the PCI, before and after the PCI, and overall was not lower than the controlled group on patients with ACS (before and after the PCI: RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.23 to 2.18, P=0.55; after the PCI: RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.23 to 1.85, P=0.42; overall: RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.32 to 1.46, P=0.32). TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue [57, 76, 83, 84] did not show the superiority. The heterogeneity was not found (before and after the PCI: P=0.44, I2 = 0%; after the PCI: P=0.89, I2 = 0%; overall: P=0.86, I2 = 0%), and the fixed-effects model was performed by the M-H test.(2) Myocardial Infraction. As for the myocardial infraction, twelve articles [34, 41, 50, 51, 76, 89, 95–100] with 993 participants received the treatment after the PCI compared with the 4 articles [43, 44, 58, 67] with 424 patients before and after the PCI (Figure 4). The result illustrated that the occurrence of myocardial infraction of the experimental group was lower than the controlled group based on the intervention of time point after the PCI (RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.87, P=0.02). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [34, 50, 51, 58, 67, 76, 89, 95–100] showed the superiority on the time point after the PCI. The heterogeneity was also not found (after the PCI: P=1.00, I2 = 0%; before and after the PCI: P=0.96, I2 = 0%; overall: P=1.00, I2 = 0%), and the fixed-effects model was performed by the M-H test.(3) Stenocardia. Twelve studies [34, 41, 46, 50, 51, 57, 89, 95, 96, 98–100] with 1,011 patients were treated after the PCI compared with the rest of four studies [39, 58, 67, 83] with 434 patients being treated before and after the PCI (Figure 5). The result showed that the occurrence of stenocardia for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group both on the two time points of intervention (after the PCI: RR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.72, P=0.0003; before and after the PCI: RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.89, P=0.02; overall: RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.66, P<0.0001). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [34, 39, 50, 51, 57, 58, 67, 89, 95, 96, 98–100] showed the superiority on the time points before and after the PCI and after the PCI. No heterogeneity was found (after the PCI: P=0.94, I2 = 0%; before and after the PCI: P=0.61, I2 = 0%; overall: P=0.97, I2 = 0%), and the fixed-effects model was performed by the M-H test.(4) Arrhythmia. Figure 6 illustrated the outcome of arrhythmia. Three studies [41, 46, 71] with 216 patients received the treatment after the PCI compared with the five studies [39, 42–44, 93] with 567 patients received the treatment before and after the PCI. The result showed that the occurrence of arrhythmia for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group on the time points before and after the PCI (RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.56, P<0.001). Both TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [39, 42, 93] and Yiqihuoxue [41, 43, 44, 46, 71] showed the superiority on the intervention of time points before and after the PCI. No heterogeneity was found (after the PCI: P=0.73, I2 = 0%; before and after the PCI: P=0.95, I2 = 0%; overall: P=0.99, I2 = 0%), and the fixed-effects model was performed by the M-H test.In a word, even though the TCMI combined with western medicine showed the advantage on some indicators of the MACE compared with western medicine alone , the result still could not recommend the best applying point of TCMI during the perioperative period of PCI for patients with ACS.


#### 3.4.3. Inflammatory Factors

Figures7 and 8 illustrate the inflammatory factors (hs-CRP and IL-6) of patients with ACS after the treatment of experimental group and controlled group based on the effect of Yiqihuoxue or Liqihuoxue and the time points of intervention.Figure 7
Forest plot of hs-CRP based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.Figure 8
Forest plot of IL-6 based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.(1) hs-CRP. A total of 13 studies [34, 37, 45, 47, 52, 53, 59, 62, 94, 96, 98–100] with 1,249 patients were treated after the PCI compared with 8 studies [36, 39, 42, 63, 66, 67, 91, 93] with 699 patients being treated before and after the PCI (Figure 7). The result of meta-analysis indicated that the level of hs-CRP for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group (after the PCI: Std. MD = −1.95, 95% CI = −2.53 to −1.38, P<0.001; before and after the PCI: Std. MD = −1.65, 95% CI = −2.19 to −1.11, P<0.001; overall: Std. MD = −1.77, 95% CI = −2.17 to −1.36, P<0.001). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [34, 36, 37, 39, 42, 52, 53, 59, 62, 63, 66, 67, 91, 93, 94, 96, 98–100] was superior to the Yiqihuoxue [45, 47] during the perioperative period of PCI. But it still could not recommend the best time point of intervention during the perioperative period of PCI. Significant statistical heterogeneity was found (after the PCI: P<0.01, I2 = 99%; before and after the PCI: P<0.01, I2 = 97%; overall: P<0.01, I2 = 98%), and the random-effects model was performed by the IV test. The subgroup analysis was applied to explore the source of heterogeneity based on the classification of area (north or south of China), level of hospitals (three A hospital or not), and sample size of studies (more than 100 or less than 100). The result indicated that the level of hospitals might was the source of heterogeneity (see Figures S3–S5 in the Supplementary Materials).(2) IL-6. Seven articles [34, 35, 53, 97–100] with 556 patients received the treatment after the PCI compared with only 1 article [73] with 100 patients received the treatment before and after the PCI (Figure 8). The result showed that the IL-6 for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group on the time point after the PCI (Std. MD = −1.77, 95% CI = −2.22 to −1.31, P<0.001), and the Liqihuoxue [34, 35, 53, 73, 97–100] was the most frequent effect of TCMI in this part. Obvious heterogeneity was found (after the PCI: P<0.01, I2 = 81%; overall: P<0.01, I2 = 92%), and the random-effects model was performed by the IV test. The subgroup analysis was also conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity based on the classification of area (north or south of China), level of hospitals (three A hospital or not), and sample size of studies (more than 100 or less than 100). But the result could not reveal the source of heterogeneity (see Figures S6–S8 in the Supplementary Materials).


### 3.5. Adverse Events

From the included researches, the report of potential adverse events mainly concentrated on bleeding events [37, 46, 58, 60, 62, 95], kidney disfunction [41, 51], angina pectoris or myocardial infarction [41–43, 91, 92], arrhythmia [41–43, 46], respiratory system disfunction [41, 92], heart failure [46, 91], allergy [51, 57, 62], headache [57], digestive system disfunction [92], and dizziness [91, 92]. Although there was no evidence that adverse events were directly caused by the application of TCMI, the bleeding events including gastrointestinal and gingival bleeding, haemoptysis, puncture point hematoma, and subcutaneous congestion were the most relevant events.


### 3.6. Publication Bias

We applied the RR or MD as the midpoint to draw the funnel plot (Figure9). The publication bias was evaluated in the funnel plot by comparing the symmetry of included studies on clinical efficiency, MI, stenocardia, and hs-CRP. Each outcome indicator should include more than 10 studies. The funnel plot was symmetrical in visual for clinical efficiency, MI, and stenocardia, while not for hs-CRP. The statistical method of Egger’s and Begg’s test was conducted and further verified the publication bias by the software Stata. The results of Egger’s and Begg’s test indicated that the publication bias did not exist in clinical efficiency (Egger’s test (t = 0.05, P=0.962>0.05); Begg’s test (z = 0.25, P=0.805>0.05)) and hs-CRP (Egger’s test (t = −0.89, P=0.389>0.05); Begg’s test (z = 1.86, P=0.063>0.05)). However, the MI (Egger’s test (t = −5.73, P=0.001); Begg’s test (z = 2.60, P=0.009)) and stenocardia (Egger’s test (t = −4.08, P=0.001); Begg’s test (z = 2.28, P=0.023)) obtained the publication bias (see Figures S9–S12 in the Supplementary Materials).Figure 9
The funnel plot of (a) clinical efficiency, (b) MI, (c) stenocardia, and (d) hs-CRP.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.1. Study Selection

The flow diagram of the screening and selection of potential articles was illustrated in Figure1. A total of 579 related studies were identified from the medical databases, and 342 studies were ruled out due to the duplication. After the screening of the title and abstract, one hundred and forty-two studies were further excluded for the following reasons: (1) twenty-eight were experimental studies, (2) sixty-six clinical studies did not belong to RCTs, (3) fifteen studies belonged to reviews or meta-analyses, (4) twenty-two studies were protocols, and (5) eleven studies could not obtain the full-text paper. There were 27 studies excluded after the full-text paper reading for the following reasons: (1) the experimental group was not eligible for 6 studies, (2) the controlled group was not eligible for 2 studies, (3) insufficient data were found in 7 studies, and (4) twelve studies had inappropriate criteria for the indicators of outcome. Overall, a total of 68 articles with 6,043 patients were enrolled in this research.Figure 1
The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.


## 3.2. Study Characteristics

A total of 68 studies conformed to the final eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis (Table1). All studies were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and fifteen trials among them were multicentred studies, which performed in different hospitals of China [34, 48, 49, 51, 55, 58, 59, 61, 66, 82, 88, 94, 95, 100, 101]. The publishing year of studies was found between 2004 and 2018. The sample size of studies ranged from 38 [46] to 203 [65], and the age range of male and female was between 31 [37] and 84 [41] years old. As for the classification of ACS, only twenty-one studies clearly defined including seven studies for UA [36, 73, 74, 78, 80, 86], eleven studies for STEMI [42, 45, 46, 49, 51, 66, 70, 71, 91, 92, 95], and three for NSTEMI [52, 72, 75]. However, the rest of forty-eight studies did not introduce the classification. The types of TCMI in the experimental group were diversified and listed as follows: injection of Dazhuhongjingtian [34–38], Shuxuetong [39, 42, 83–89], Shenmai [40–44, 46–48], Danshen [45, 49], Danhong [50–67, 73, 74], Dengzhanhuasu [68], Gualoupi [69], Guanxinning [70, 71], Safflower yellow [72, 75], Safflower [76–78], Kudiezi [79], Shengmai [80–82], Xiangdan [90], Xuesaitong [91–95], Xueshuantong [96–100], and Yiqifumai [101]. The detailed information of TCMI, which included constituents of TCMI, Latin names of constituents for Chinese medicine, ratios of constituents, specifications clinical use of the TCMI, and Chinese national medicine permission numbers, was well illustrated (see Table S2 and Figures S13–S28 in the Supplementary Materials). The western medicine contained the anticoagulant, antimyocardial ischemia, antiplatelet, lipid-lowering, and antihypertensive treatment. As for the duration of therapy, all included studies except seven [56, 71, 72, 78, 80, 81, 100] clearly reported. The time of follow-up was mentioned in fifteen included studies [43, 44, 46, 48, 51, 53, 58, 71, 75, 76, 79, 95, 97, 99, 100]. It needs to highlight that only fourteen included studies [37, 41–43, 46, 50, 51, 57, 59, 60, 62, 91, 92, 95] reported the adverse events, which focused on the bleeding event, gastrointestinal reaction, and arrhythmia.Table 1
The characteristics of included studies.
ArticleAreaClassification of diseaseSample size (male/female)Age (years, average age: mean ± SD or mean)Other information of baseline characteristicsExperimental group (E)Controlled group (C)Duration of treatment and follow-upOutcome evaluation and quality assessmentAdverse event(1) Hongtao and Yuan [34]Henan Province; China;multicentersAMI80 (48/32)E: 43 to 61; 51.4 ± 5.1C: 42 to 59; 49. 3 ± 4.6NYHA:E/C: I: 13/14, II: 12/13, III: 8/8, IV: 7/5Injection ofDazhuhongjingtian combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)Four weeks; Six months(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (MPO, hs-CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α)(3) Color Doppler ultrasound (LVEDD and LVESD)(4) Indexes of markers of myocardial injury (BNP, cTnT, and CK-MB)(5) MACE(2) Jia and Jun [35]Jiangsu Province; China; single centerACS80 (48/32)40 to 83; 63.11NRInjection ofDazhuhongjingtian combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)Three to seven days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Laboratory indexes (CK-MB, LDH, and AST)(3) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, SOD, NO, and CRP)(3) Huirong et al. [36]Hebei Province; China; single centerUA64 (31/33)E: 50 to 72; 60.39 ± 7.79C: 51 to 70; 58.9 ± 7.45BMI:E/C: (25.87 ± 3.29)/(26.62 ± 3.16)Injection ofDazhuhongjingtian combined with ①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 32, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 32, after the PCI)Fourteen days;NRLaboratory indexes (MCP-1 and hs-CRP)NR(4) Yushan et al. [37]Henan Province; China; single centerAMI82 (52/30)31 to 72; 51.3 ± 27.3NRInjection ofDazhuhongjingtian combined with ①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 42, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)Fourteen days;NRLaboratory indexes (ET, hs-CRP, Fb, and blood lipid)I(5) Xin [38]Jiangsu Province; China; single centerACS40 (30/10)E: 61.05 ± 9.62C: 63.35 ± 10.67NRInjection ofDazhuhongjingtian combined with ①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 20, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 20, after the PCI)Five to seven days;NR(1) Indexes of markers of myocardial injury (CK-MB, LDH, and cTnT)NR(2) Blood biochemical examination(3) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, SOD, and CRP)(6) Lanrong [39]Hebei Province; China; single centerAMI100 (58/42)E: 50 to 72C: 50 to 75NRInjection ofShuxuetong and Shenmai combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)One week;NR(1) hs-CRPNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound (LA, LVEDD, LVESD, and VEF%)(3) MACE(7) Fengmei et al. [40]Zhejiang Province; China; single centerAMI67 (52/15)E: 65.9 ± 10.4C: 66.2 ± 11.1Combined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 22/23; diabetes: 17/13; hyperlipidemia: 5/7Injection ofShenmai combined with ①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 35, before and after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 32, before and after the PCI)Seven days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Laboratory indexes (apelin-13 and NO)(8) Lin et al. [41]Liaoning Province; China; single centerACS74 (35/39)35 to 84; 59.22 ± 7.03NRInjection ofShenmai combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 37, after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 37, after the PCI)Eight weeks;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyI; II; III; IV; IX(2) Laboratory index(3) ECG(4) Adverse events(9) Zhaoxia [42]Hebei Province; China; single centerSTEMI100 (55/45)E: 69. 0 ± 7.6C: 68.2 ± 7.1HYHA: E/C: I: 22/24; II: 28/26Site of MI: E/C: anterior wall and extensive anterior wall: 28/26; inferior wall: 14/15; high lateral: 8/9.Injection ofShuxuetong and Shenmai combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)One week;NR(1) Laboratory indexes (hs-CRP, SOD, and MDA)III; IV(2) Color Doppler ultrasound (LVEF and size of MI)(3) MACE(10) Lilan and Xiaoxiao [43]Zhejiang Province; China; single centerAMI100 (61/39)E: 45 to 78, 58.41 ± 12.39C: 43 to 78, 57.68 ± 12.03NRInjection ofShenmai combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)Seven days; one to six months(1) Color Doppler ultrasoundIII; IV(2) Indexes of markers of myocardial injury (CK-MB, BNP, and cTnT)(3) Adverse events(11) Hua et al. [44]Anhui Province; China; single centerAMI92 (58/34)E: 62.72 ± 12.12C: 61.27 ± 10.84Combined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 19/21; diabetes: 12/13; smoke: 17/21; alcohol consumption: 14/12.Injection ofShenmai combined with ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 46, before and after the PCI)②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 46, before and after the PCI)Seven days; three months(1) Blood biochemical examinationNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound(3) MACE(12) Peng et al. [45]Jiangsu Province; China; single centerSTEMI120 (104/16)E1: 47 to 75, 61.2 ± 9.8E2: 45 to 75, 61.9 ± 10.1E3: 48 to 75, 59.7 ± 8.5C: 47 to 75, 59.7 ± 8.1NRE1:Salvianolate injection combined with ①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)E2: Shenmai injection combined with ①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)E3: Salvianolate injection and Shenmai injection combined with ①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)Seven days; NR(1) LVEFNR(2) Nt-proBNP(3) hs-CRP(4) Adverse events(13) Caiyan et al. [46]Zhejiang Province; China; single centerSTEMI38 (23/15)43 to 77, 63.83 ± 8.3NRShenmai injection combined with ①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 19, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 19, after the PCI)Two weeks; twenty-two weeks(1) Plasma aldosteroneIII; IV; V(2) Color Doppler ultrasound(3) Adverse events(14) Min et al. [47]Zhejiang Province; China; single centerAMI68 (NR)NRNRShenmai injection combined with conventional western medicine (NR) (n = 34, after the PCI)Conventional western medicine (NR) (n = 34, after the PCI)One week;NRIndexes of inflammatory cytokines (NO, ET, SOD, hs-CRP, CD62P, and CD63)NR(15) Rong et al. [48]Liaoning Province; China; multicentersAMI56 (35/21)E: 47 to 68, 56.7 ± 10.2C: 46 to 67, 55.9 ± 11NRShenmai injection combined with ①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 26, before and after the PCI)Two weeks; four weeks(1) Color Doppler ultrasoundNR(2) Clinical events(16) Faming et al. [49]Shandong Province; China; multicentersSTEMI98 (65/33)E: 64.28 ± 12.28C: 63.96 ± 12.25Killip classification: E/C: I: 38/39, II: 5/4, III: 1/2, and IV: 1.Compound Salvia miltiorrhiza injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 49, before and after PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 49, before and after PCI)17 days;NRMACENR(17) Yonghao et al. [50]Guangdong Province; China; single centerACS60 (34/26)E: 30 to 78, 49.45 ± 11.03C: 30 to 76, 48.63 ± 10.49Combined diseases and personal history: E/C: diabetes: 8/7; hypertension: 6/7; smoke: 13/11; hyperlipidemia: 3/5Danhong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, after the PCI)Two weeks; NR(1) Indexes of markers of myocardial injuryNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound (LVEF and LVED)(3) MACE(18) Guangwei et al. [51]Shaanxi Province; China; multicentersSTEMI120 (74/46)E: 58 to 80, 65.13 ± 2.38C: 56 to 78, 64.38 ± 2.12NRDanhong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)Fourteen days; six months(1) Clinical efficiencyII; VI(2) Indexes of IL-6 and IL-17(3) LVEF(4) MACE(5) Adverse events(19) Zhiqiang et al. [52]Henan Province; China; single centerNSTEMI180 (NR)NRNRDanhong injection combined with ② treatment (n = 90, after the PCI)② treatment (n = 90, after the PCI)14 days;NR(1) Indexes of hs-CRP and ETNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound (cardiac function)(3) Clinical efficiency(20) Weiwei et al. [53]Shandong Province; China; single centerACS100 (67/33)E: 61 to 80, 71.26 ± 4.82C: 61 to 79, 68.28 ± 4.88NRDanhong injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, after the PCI)Two weeks;Two months(1) Vascular endothelial functionNR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, MMP-9, and hs-CRP)(21) Mengzhao [54]Guangxi Province; China; single centerAMI100 (63/37)35 to 70, 52.87 ± 9.03NRDanhong injection combined with ⑥ (n = 52, after PCI)⑥ (n = 52, after PCI)Three days after the PCI;NR(1) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP, and IL-10)NR(2) Laboratory indexes (MMP-9 and BNP)(3) Color Doppler ultrasound(22) Yang [55]Hebei Province; China; multicentersACS104 (55/49)E: 47 to 74, 58.73 ± 8.45C: 48 to 72, 59.21 ± 8.57NRDanhong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 52, after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 52, after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) Vascular endothelial functionNR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (pentraxin-3, IL-18, IL-10, and LpPLA2)(3) Color Doppler ultrasound(23) Min et al. [56]Hebei Province; China; single centerAMI120 (75/45)E: 51 to 74, 62.23 ± 11.26C: 51 to 77, 64.56 ± 12.85NRDanhong injection combined with ② treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)② treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)NR(1) CRPNR(2) Rate of no-reflow(24) Xinmin et al. [57]Shanghai city; China; single centerAMI71 (49/22)48 to 81, 64 ± 12NRDanhong injection combined with conventional western medical treatment (n = 36, after the PCI)Conventional western medical treatment (n = 35, after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyVII; VI(2) MACE(3) LVEF(4) Adverse events(25) Jianfeng et al. [58]Zhejiang Province; China; multicentersACS125 (69/56)E: 55 to 79, 62.1 ± 10.6C: 53 to 76, 61.5 ± 10.3Classification of ACSE/C: AMI: 36/35; UA: 27/27.Danhong injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 63, before and after the PCI surgery)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 62, before and after the PCI surgery)Two weeks;Two months(1) Vascular endothelial functionNR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, and CRP)(3) MACE(26) Yinghua and Lin [59]Tianjing city; China; multicentersAMI180 (106/47)E: 57 to 79, 72.1 ± 6.5C: 55 to 80, 72.3 ± 5.8NRDanhong injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 90, after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 90, after the PCI)Ten days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyI(2) Level of SOD and hs-CRP(3) Adverse events(27) Yongxiang and Qiang [60]Henan Province; China; single centerACS68 (41/27)E: 55.7 ± 7.4C: 54.5 ± 8.2BMI: E/C: (20.6 ± 2.1)/(21.5 ± 1.6)Danhong injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 34, after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 34, after the PCI)10 days;NR(1) Falling rate of ST-segmentI(2) Adverse events(28) Xiaonan et al. [61]Tianjing city; China; multicentersAMI60 (39/21)NRNRDanhong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) Cardiac arrhythmia before and after the PCINR(2) CK-MB(3) Scattering parameters(29) Beixin and Shan [62]Liaoning Province; China; single centerACS70 (37/33)33 to 75, 54.5 ± 10.9NRDanhong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 36, after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 36, after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) hs-CRP and ET-1I; VI(2) Adverse events(30) Hong et al. [63]Hebei Province; China; single centerAMI59 (43/16)E: 55 to 71, 61.9 ± 5.2C: 54 to 71, 65.2 ± 4.5Combined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 28/29; diabetes: 16/23; hyperlipidemia: 26/24.Danhong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 29, before and after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) hs-CRPNR(2) Falling rate of ST-segment(31) Yong et al. [64]Hunan Province; China; single centerACS42 (27/15)E: 70.6 ± 5.4C: 69.1 ± 6.0Classification of ACS: E/C: AMI: 6/5; UA: 15/16Danhong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 21, after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 21, after the PCI)Fourteen days; NRIndexes of platelet activation (CD62P and CD63)NR(32) Zhihui et al. [65]Jilin Province; China; single centerAMI203 (111/92)E: 39 to 79, 71.6 ± 8.6C: 49 to 75, 70.1 ± 8.1Combined diseases: E/C: AMI: 31/26; diabetes: 30/29; hypertension: 35/27Danhong injection combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 116, after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 87, after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Indexes of coagulation function(3) Color Doppler ultrasound(4) TIMI(33) Xiaodong et al. [66]Beijing city; China; multicentersSTEMI61 (38/23)E: 60.1 ± 10.6C: 59.8 ± 7.6NRDanhong injection combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 31, before and after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) ECGNR(2) Symptom of MI(3) CRP(34) Kai et al. [67]Shanghai city; China; single centerACS91 (66/25)E: 65.6 ± 17.3C: 67.2 ± 16.2Classification of ACS: E/C: UA: 23/23; STEMI: 14/13; NSTEMI: 8/10.Danhong injection combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 46, before and after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 45, before and after the PCI)Four weeks;NR(1) Lipid levelsNR(2) hs-CRP(3) MACE(35) Fan and Shayi [68]Guangxi Province; China; single centerACS67 (NR)NRCombined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 25/21; hyperlipidemia: 19/16; diabetes: 10/8Dengzhanhuasu injection combined with ①, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 37, before and after the PCI)①, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)One week; NR(1) HemorrheologyNR(2) Braunwald classification of angina pectoris(3) MACE(36) Yuting and Zheng [69]Neimenggu Province; China; single centerACS56 (NR)E: 67.8 ± 9.3C: 65.6 ± 0.1Combined diseases and personal history: E/C: smoke: 64.2%/21.4%; diabetes: 21.4%/25%Gualoupi injection combined with ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 28 after the PCI)②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 28 after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) Vascular endothelial functionNR(2) Platelet function(37) Hong et al. [70]Hebei Province; China; single centerSTEMI98 (52/46)E: 35 to 71, 55 ± 4C: 34 to 71, 56 ± 5Killip classification: E/C: I: 44/45; II: 4/5Guanxinning injection combined with ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 48 after the PCI surgery)②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 50 after the PCI surgery)Ten days;NR(1) Color Doppler ultrasoundNR(38) Hong et al. [71]Hebei Province; China; single centerSTEMI86 (56/30)34 to 72NRGuanxinning injection combined with ②, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 42 after the PCI)②, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 44 after the PCI)NR;Three months(1) LVEFNR(2) MACE(39) Rui et al. [72]Shaanxi Province; China; single centerUA60 (41/19)E: 63.5 ± 11.2C: 61.3 ± 13.7Combined diseases and personal history: E/C: hypertension: 11/9; diabetes: 9/12; smoke: 17/13Safflower yellow injection combined with ②, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30 before the PCI)②, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30 before the PCI)NR(1) Myocardial injury markersNR(40) Weiwei et al. [73]Beijing city; China; single centerUA100 (70/30)42 to 77, 58 ± 9.2NRDanhong injection combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)Seven days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Laboratory indexes (IL-6, cTNT, and hs-CRP)(41) Chuntao and Lihua [74]Shaanxi Province; China; single centerUA180 (102/78)E: 45 to 76, 62.38 ± 7.14C: 46 to 78, 62.53 ± 7.48Combined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 40/47; hyperlipidemia: 28/28; diabetes: 22/13Danhong injection combined with ①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 90, before and after the PCI)①, ②, and ③ treatment (n = 90, before and after the PCI)Two weeks; NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Vascular endothelial function (NO, ET-1, vWF, and FMD)(42) Yunshu et al. [75]Jilin Province; China; single centerNSTEMI100 (61/39)More than 65 years oldNRSafflower yellow injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 50, before and after the PCI)Ten to fourteen days; thirty days(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Laboratory indexes(3) Adverse events(4) Bleeding events(43) Dingxue and Wenbao [76]Shaanxi province; China; single centerACS88 (33/53)44 to 85, 68.1 ± 8.5The area of infraction: anterior wall: infarction: 6, extensive anterior wall infarction: 24; lateral wall infarction: 28; inferior and posterior wall infarction: 20Safflower injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 44, after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 44, after the PCI)Fourteen days;Four weeks(1) Color Doppler ultrasoundNR(2) MACE(44) Xian et al. [77]Shanghai city; China; single centerACS88 (51/37)E: 45 to 83, 63.5;C: 51 to 82, 64.5Classification: E/C: UA: 30/28; NSTEMI: 14/12Safflower injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 44, before and after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 44, before and after the PCI)Seven days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Laboratory indexes (CRP and TnI)(45) Suyun et al. [78]Hebei Province; China; single centerUA102 (62/40)E: 54.4 ± 8.6C: 56.6 ± 7.4NRSafflower injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 51, before the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 51, before the PCI)NR(1) ECG (ST-segment)NR(2) Vascular endothelial function (NO and ET-1)(3) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α)(46) Yujuan and Maiti [79]Xinjiang Province; China; single centerAMI124 (73/51)E: 58.4 ± 9.6C:57.6 ± 10.1Infarction relate artery: E/C: center anterior descending branch: 32/30; center circumflex branch: 10/11; right coronary artery: 20/21.Kudiezi injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 62, before and after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 62, before and after the PCI)Two weeksSix months(1) ECGNR(2) MACE(3) Laboratory indexes (CK-MB, cTnI, and ET-1)(47) Yuefan et al. [80]Shandong Province; China; single centerUA81 (NR)E: 68.7 ± 10C: 68.1 ± 9.1Personal history and combined diseases: E/C: smoke: 24/23; hypertension: 29/30; diabetes: 8/7Shengmai injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 41, after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 41, after the PCI)NR(1) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and TNF-α)NR(48) Yinghui [81]Sichuan Province; China; single centerACS120 (67/53)E: 34 to 65, 41 ± 1.2C: 35 to 63, 42 ± 1.4Combined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 58.33%/61.67%, diabetes: 33.3%/31.67%; family history of coronary heart disease: 6.67%/8.33%Shengmai injection combined with ②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)②, ③, and ④ treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)NR(1) Blood lipid levelNR(2) The score of PL, AS, and AF(3) The score SL and LP(4) Color Doppler ultrasound(5) Blood platelets(49) Xuan et al. [82]Beijing city; China; multicentersAMI62 (35/27)E: 36 to 89, 58 ± 14.9C: 43 to 85, 54.9 ± 15.2Combined diseases: E/C: hypertension: 24/22; diabetes: 10/7; dyslipidemia: 9/6; stroke: 3/3Shengmai injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 32, before and after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)Seven days;NR(1) TIMINr(2) Color Doppler ultrasound(3) Laboratory indexes(4) MACE(50) Zhe et al. [83]Shandong Province; China; single centerAMI90 (49/41)E: 61.1 ± 5.3;C: 61.0 ± 5.3Combined diseases: E/C: hyperlipidemia: 17/15; hypertension: 22/23; diabetes: 6/7NYHA: E/C: II: 30/32; III: 15/13.Shuxuetong injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 45, before and after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 45, before and after the PCI)Ten days;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound (LVMI, LVPWT, LVEDD, and LVEF)(3) Laboratory indexes (CK-MB and cTnI)(4) MACE(51) Xiaoyan [84]Shaanxi Province; China; single centerAMI60 (35/25)E: 64 to 89, 73.5 ± 6.6)C: 63 to 88, 73.1 ± 6.5Course of diseases: E/C: (4.3 ± 1.2)/(4.2 ± 1.1) yearsShuxuetong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)One week;NR(1) HemorheologyNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound(3). MACE(52) Zhenda et al. [85]Guangdong Province; China; single centerAMI40 (NR)E: 64.2 ± 8.0D: 63.5 ± 11.0Combined diseases: E/C: diabetes: 24.2%/23.6%; hypertension: 72.7%/71.5%Shuxuetong injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 20, after the PCI surgery)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 20, after the PCI surgery)Two weeks; NR(1) Color Doppler ultrasoundNR(2) Laboratory indexes(3) Adverse events(4) MACE(53) Xuguang and Rong [86]Neimenggu Province; China; single centerUA96 (52/44)E: 42 to 72, 62.5 ± 10.1C: 45 to 72, 61.6 ± 11.3Course of disease: E/C: (7.2 ± 3.6)/(7.7 ± 3.8) yearsShuxuetong injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, before the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, before the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) Blood lipid levelNR(2) Coagulation function(3) MACE(54) Tiezhou and Jie [87]Jiangsu Province; China; single centerAMI120 (82/38)E: 40 to 84, 68.5 ± 8.5C: 38 to 88, 67.5 ± 7.5NRShuxuetong injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) Clinical efficiencyNR(2) ECG(55) Yushuang et al. [88]Jilin Province; China; multicentersAMI60 (31/29)43 to 71, 57.8 ± 13.1NRShuxuetong injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)Three days;NR(1) SICAM-1NR(56) Jingchun et al. [89]Jiangxi Province; China; single centerACS84 (54/30)E: 54 to 82, 58 ± 4C: 52 to 78, 56 ± 4NRShuxuetong injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 50, after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 34, after the PCI)One week;NR(1) Vascular endothelial functionNR(2) MACE(57) Jianping et al. [90]Guangdong Province; China; single centerAMI60 (38/22)E: 48 to 68, 53C: 51 to 65, 59.3Combined diseases: E/C: arrhythmia: 4/5; cardiogenic shock: 5/4; heart failure: 3/2.Xiangdan injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 30, before and after the PCI)Seven days;NRClinical efficiencyNR(58) Huajin et al. [91]Shanghai city; China; single centerSTEMI120 (73/47)E: 40 to 72;C: 39 to 73Combined diseases: E/C: diabetes: 14/15; hypertension: 25/26; hyperlipidemia: 21/19Xuesaitong injection combined with ②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, before and after the PCI)②, ③, ④, and ⑤ treatment (n = 60, before and after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) TIMIIV; V; VIII(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and PTX-3)(3) Color Doppler ultrasound(4) Adverse events(59) Lianren [92]Shandong Province; China; single centerSTEMI104 (59/45)E: 23 to 78, 56.71 ± 6.25C: 21 to 80, 57.29 ± 6.61Combined diseases: E/C: diabetes: 13/11; hypertension: 29/30; hyperlipidemia: 22/23.Xuesaitong injection combined with ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 52, before and after the PCI)②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 52, before and after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) TIMII; IV; VIII; IX; IX(2) Color Doppler ultrasound(3) Adverse events(60) Danzhen and Lingfei [93]Zhejiang Province; China; single centerAMI107 (64/43)E: 51.9 ± 8.4C: 52.3 ± 8.2NRXuesaitong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 52, before and after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 52, before and after the PCI)Fourteen days;NR(1) ECGNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasound(3) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (sLoX-1, hs-CRP, and TNF-α)(4) Blood stasis syndrome score(5) MACE(61) Zhili et al. [94]Heilongjiang Province; China; multicentersAMI80 (46/34)E: 62.1 ± 7.9C: 63.5 ± 7.8NRXuesaitong injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 40, before and after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 40, before and after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) Laboratory indexes (BNP and MMP-2)NR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and IL-6)(62) Lijun et al. [95]Shandong Province; China; multicentersSTEMI39 (23/16)E: 57.6 ± 10.2C: 55.4 ± 9.8Combined diseases and personal history: E/C: diabetes: 8/6; hypertension: 8/6; smoke: 9/8Xuesaitong injection combined with conventional western medical treatment (NR) (n = 20, after the PCI)Conventional western medical treatment (NR) (n = 19, after the PCI)Two days;Six months(1) TIMII(2) ECG (ST-segment)(3) Adverse events(4) MACE(63) Zhongchun et al. [96]Hunan Province; China; single centerACS92 (56/36)E: 52.97 ± 10.42C: 53.38 ± 9.46Combined diseases and personal history: E/C: hypertension: 16/18; smoke: 21/20Xueshuantong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 46, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 46, after the PCI)Two weeks;NR(1) Blood lipid levelNR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and TNF-α)(3) ET-1(4) MACE(64) Yingxin et al. [97]Guangdong Province; China; single centerAMI68 (37/31)E: 60.23 ± 7.98C: 59.84 ± 8.27NRXueshuantong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 34, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 34, after the PCI)Three weeks;Twelve months(1) Blood lipid levelNR(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP, TNF-α, and NT-proBNP)(3) Color Doppler ultrasound(4) Rehabilitation results (QoF and Barthel score)(5) MACE(65) Ni [98]Shaanxi Province; China; single centerACS114 (71/43)E: 47 to 78, 55.8 ± 4.4C: 49 to 76, 55.4 ± 4.2Classification of disease: E/C: AMI: 27/27; UA: 30/30Xueshuantong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 57, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 57, after the PCI)One month;NR(1) Blood lipid levelNE(2) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and IL-6)(3) MACE(66) Yiguang et al. [99]Beijing city; China; single centerACS64 (37/27)E: 28 to 69, 55.68 ± 5.9C: 26 to 68, 55.41 ± 5.63Classification of disease: E/C: AMI: 14/13; UA: 19/17Xueshuantong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 32, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 32, after the PCI)Fourteen to twenty-one days;One month(1) Myocardial microcirculation perfusionNR(2) Blood lipid level(3) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and IL-6)(4) Vascular endothelial functions (ET, Fg, and vWF)(5) MACE(67) Caihong and Jiuxi [100]Henan Province; China; multicentersACS80 (47/33)E: 55.7 ± 5.7C: 55.4 ± 4.4Classification of disease: E/C: AMI: 17/16; UA: 23/26Xueshuantong injection combined with ①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)①, ②, ③, and ⑤ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)NR;One month(1) Myocardial microcirculation perfusionNR(2) Blood lipid level(3) Indexes of inflammatory cytokines (hs-CRP and IL-6)(4) Vascular endothelial functions (ET, Fg, and vWF)(5) MACE(68) Hongyu and Lan [101]Hebei Province; China; multicentersAMI80 (47/33)E: 34 to 72, 52.6 ± 10.3C: 38 to 74, 53.4 ± 11.2NRYiqifumai injection combined with ② and ③ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)② and ③ treatment (n = 40, after the PCI)Seven days;NR(1) Scores of TCM symptomsNR(2) Color Doppler ultrasoundNotes. AMI: acute myocardial infarction; E: experimental group; C: control group; NYHA: New York Heart Association; NR: not report; BMI: body mass index; MI: myocardial infarction; CRP: C-reactive protein; LVEF: center ventricular ejection fraction; TIMI: thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; ①: lipid lowering; ②: anticoagulant; ③: antiplatelet; ④: antihypertensive; ⑤: antimyocardial ischemia; ⑥: nitroglycerin injection; I: bleeding events; II: abnormal renal function; IV: angina pectoris or myocardial infarction; III: arrhythmia; V: heart failure; VI: allergy; VII: headache; IX: abnormal digestive system; VIII: dizziness; IX: respiratory system disfunction.


## 3.3. Quality Analysis

For the included studies, twenty-two [42, 47, 50, 51, 54, 55, 57, 60, 62, 63, 72, 73, 76, 81, 83–85, 91, 92, 96, 97, 100] mentioned the random sequence generation. No study clearly illustrated or contained the allocation concealment. Only 2 studies [74, 76] introduced the blinding method, which was the sealed envelope method. As for the aspect of incomplete outcome data, no included studies had the attrition bias basically. Only 6 studies [48, 78, 87–90] had the question of existing of other biases (see Figures S1 and S2 and Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials).


## 3.4. Meta-Analysis

### 3.4.1. Clinical Efficiency

Figure2 illustrates the clinical efficiency of TCMI based on the effect of Yiqihuoxue or Liqihuoxue and the time points of intervention. There were 15 articles including 3,332 participants analysed in the forest plot [34, 35, 40, 41, 51–53, 59, 65, 74, 75, 77, 83, 87, 90]. We extracted 8 articles [34, 35, 41, 51, 52, 59, 65, 87] (2,090 participants) from the 15 studies to compare with the rest of 7 articles [40, 53, 74, 75, 77, 83, 90] (1,242 patients) based on the different time points of intervention during the perioperative period of PCI. The result showed that the clinical efficiency of TCMI combined with the western medicine (experimental group) was superior to the western medicine alone (controlled group) on patients with ACS (before the PCI: RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.20, P<0.01; before and after PCI: RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.34, P<0.01; overall: RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.23, P<0.01). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [34, 35, 51–53, 59, 65, 74, 75, 77, 83, 87] combined with western medicine was superior to the western medicine in the time points of before and after the PCI and after the PCI. The results of the clinical efficiency between the experimental group and the controlled group had statistical difference. The heterogeneity was small (before the PCI: P=0.33, I2 = 12%; before and after the PCI: P=0.79, I2 = 0%; overall: P=0.13, I2 = 13%), and the fixed-effects model was performed to calculate combined data by the M-H test. However, the results could not recommend the best time point of intervention for TCMI on ACS.Figure 2
Forest plot of clinical efficiency of TCMI based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue. Note. represents the TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue;  represents the TCMI with the effect of Yiqihuoxue.


### 3.4.2. MACE

Figures3–6 illustrate the MACE of patients with ACS after the treatment of experimental group and controlled group based on the effect of Liqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue and the time point of intervention.Figure 3
Forest plot of all-cause mortality based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.Figure 4
Forest plot of myocardial infarction based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.Figure 5
Forest plot of stenocardia based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.Figure 6
Forest plot of arrhythmia based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.(1) All-Cause Mortality. There were 6 articles including 508 participants analysed the all-cause mortality in the forest plot [49, 57, 71, 76, 83, 84] (Figure 3). Three articles [49, 83, 84] with 250 participants received the treatment before and after the PCI compared with the rest of 3 articles [57, 71, 76] with 258 patients received the treatment after the PCI. The meta-analysis showed that the occurrence of all-cause mortality of the experimental group after the PCI, before and after the PCI, and overall was not lower than the controlled group on patients with ACS (before and after the PCI: RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.23 to 2.18, P=0.55; after the PCI: RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.23 to 1.85, P=0.42; overall: RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.32 to 1.46, P=0.32). TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue [57, 76, 83, 84] did not show the superiority. The heterogeneity was not found (before and after the PCI: P=0.44, I2 = 0%; after the PCI: P=0.89, I2 = 0%; overall: P=0.86, I2 = 0%), and the fixed-effects model was performed by the M-H test.(2) Myocardial Infraction. As for the myocardial infraction, twelve articles [34, 41, 50, 51, 76, 89, 95–100] with 993 participants received the treatment after the PCI compared with the 4 articles [43, 44, 58, 67] with 424 patients before and after the PCI (Figure 4). The result illustrated that the occurrence of myocardial infraction of the experimental group was lower than the controlled group based on the intervention of time point after the PCI (RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.87, P=0.02). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [34, 50, 51, 58, 67, 76, 89, 95–100] showed the superiority on the time point after the PCI. The heterogeneity was also not found (after the PCI: P=1.00, I2 = 0%; before and after the PCI: P=0.96, I2 = 0%; overall: P=1.00, I2 = 0%), and the fixed-effects model was performed by the M-H test.(3) Stenocardia. Twelve studies [34, 41, 46, 50, 51, 57, 89, 95, 96, 98–100] with 1,011 patients were treated after the PCI compared with the rest of four studies [39, 58, 67, 83] with 434 patients being treated before and after the PCI (Figure 5). The result showed that the occurrence of stenocardia for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group both on the two time points of intervention (after the PCI: RR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.72, P=0.0003; before and after the PCI: RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.89, P=0.02; overall: RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.66, P<0.0001). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [34, 39, 50, 51, 57, 58, 67, 89, 95, 96, 98–100] showed the superiority on the time points before and after the PCI and after the PCI. No heterogeneity was found (after the PCI: P=0.94, I2 = 0%; before and after the PCI: P=0.61, I2 = 0%; overall: P=0.97, I2 = 0%), and the fixed-effects model was performed by the M-H test.(4) Arrhythmia. Figure 6 illustrated the outcome of arrhythmia. Three studies [41, 46, 71] with 216 patients received the treatment after the PCI compared with the five studies [39, 42–44, 93] with 567 patients received the treatment before and after the PCI. The result showed that the occurrence of arrhythmia for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group on the time points before and after the PCI (RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.56, P<0.001). Both TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [39, 42, 93] and Yiqihuoxue [41, 43, 44, 46, 71] showed the superiority on the intervention of time points before and after the PCI. No heterogeneity was found (after the PCI: P=0.73, I2 = 0%; before and after the PCI: P=0.95, I2 = 0%; overall: P=0.99, I2 = 0%), and the fixed-effects model was performed by the M-H test.In a word, even though the TCMI combined with western medicine showed the advantage on some indicators of the MACE compared with western medicine alone , the result still could not recommend the best applying point of TCMI during the perioperative period of PCI for patients with ACS.


### 3.4.3. Inflammatory Factors

Figures7 and 8 illustrate the inflammatory factors (hs-CRP and IL-6) of patients with ACS after the treatment of experimental group and controlled group based on the effect of Yiqihuoxue or Liqihuoxue and the time points of intervention.Figure 7
Forest plot of hs-CRP based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.Figure 8
Forest plot of IL-6 based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.(1) hs-CRP. A total of 13 studies [34, 37, 45, 47, 52, 53, 59, 62, 94, 96, 98–100] with 1,249 patients were treated after the PCI compared with 8 studies [36, 39, 42, 63, 66, 67, 91, 93] with 699 patients being treated before and after the PCI (Figure 7). The result of meta-analysis indicated that the level of hs-CRP for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group (after the PCI: Std. MD = −1.95, 95% CI = −2.53 to −1.38, P<0.001; before and after the PCI: Std. MD = −1.65, 95% CI = −2.19 to −1.11, P<0.001; overall: Std. MD = −1.77, 95% CI = −2.17 to −1.36, P<0.001). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [34, 36, 37, 39, 42, 52, 53, 59, 62, 63, 66, 67, 91, 93, 94, 96, 98–100] was superior to the Yiqihuoxue [45, 47] during the perioperative period of PCI. But it still could not recommend the best time point of intervention during the perioperative period of PCI. Significant statistical heterogeneity was found (after the PCI: P<0.01, I2 = 99%; before and after the PCI: P<0.01, I2 = 97%; overall: P<0.01, I2 = 98%), and the random-effects model was performed by the IV test. The subgroup analysis was applied to explore the source of heterogeneity based on the classification of area (north or south of China), level of hospitals (three A hospital or not), and sample size of studies (more than 100 or less than 100). The result indicated that the level of hospitals might was the source of heterogeneity (see Figures S3–S5 in the Supplementary Materials).(2) IL-6. Seven articles [34, 35, 53, 97–100] with 556 patients received the treatment after the PCI compared with only 1 article [73] with 100 patients received the treatment before and after the PCI (Figure 8). The result showed that the IL-6 for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group on the time point after the PCI (Std. MD = −1.77, 95% CI = −2.22 to −1.31, P<0.001), and the Liqihuoxue [34, 35, 53, 73, 97–100] was the most frequent effect of TCMI in this part. Obvious heterogeneity was found (after the PCI: P<0.01, I2 = 81%; overall: P<0.01, I2 = 92%), and the random-effects model was performed by the IV test. The subgroup analysis was also conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity based on the classification of area (north or south of China), level of hospitals (three A hospital or not), and sample size of studies (more than 100 or less than 100). But the result could not reveal the source of heterogeneity (see Figures S6–S8 in the Supplementary Materials).


## 3.4.1. Clinical Efficiency

Figure2 illustrates the clinical efficiency of TCMI based on the effect of Yiqihuoxue or Liqihuoxue and the time points of intervention. There were 15 articles including 3,332 participants analysed in the forest plot [34, 35, 40, 41, 51–53, 59, 65, 74, 75, 77, 83, 87, 90]. We extracted 8 articles [34, 35, 41, 51, 52, 59, 65, 87] (2,090 participants) from the 15 studies to compare with the rest of 7 articles [40, 53, 74, 75, 77, 83, 90] (1,242 patients) based on the different time points of intervention during the perioperative period of PCI. The result showed that the clinical efficiency of TCMI combined with the western medicine (experimental group) was superior to the western medicine alone (controlled group) on patients with ACS (before the PCI: RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.20, P<0.01; before and after PCI: RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.34, P<0.01; overall: RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.23, P<0.01). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [34, 35, 51–53, 59, 65, 74, 75, 77, 83, 87] combined with western medicine was superior to the western medicine in the time points of before and after the PCI and after the PCI. The results of the clinical efficiency between the experimental group and the controlled group had statistical difference. The heterogeneity was small (before the PCI: P=0.33, I2 = 12%; before and after the PCI: P=0.79, I2 = 0%; overall: P=0.13, I2 = 13%), and the fixed-effects model was performed to calculate combined data by the M-H test. However, the results could not recommend the best time point of intervention for TCMI on ACS.Figure 2
Forest plot of clinical efficiency of TCMI based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue. Note. represents the TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue;  represents the TCMI with the effect of Yiqihuoxue.


## 3.4.2. MACE

Figures3–6 illustrate the MACE of patients with ACS after the treatment of experimental group and controlled group based on the effect of Liqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue and the time point of intervention.Figure 3
Forest plot of all-cause mortality based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.Figure 4
Forest plot of myocardial infarction based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.Figure 5
Forest plot of stenocardia based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.Figure 6
Forest plot of arrhythmia based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.(1) All-Cause Mortality. There were 6 articles including 508 participants analysed the all-cause mortality in the forest plot [49, 57, 71, 76, 83, 84] (Figure 3). Three articles [49, 83, 84] with 250 participants received the treatment before and after the PCI compared with the rest of 3 articles [57, 71, 76] with 258 patients received the treatment after the PCI. The meta-analysis showed that the occurrence of all-cause mortality of the experimental group after the PCI, before and after the PCI, and overall was not lower than the controlled group on patients with ACS (before and after the PCI: RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.23 to 2.18, P=0.55; after the PCI: RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.23 to 1.85, P=0.42; overall: RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.32 to 1.46, P=0.32). TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue [57, 76, 83, 84] did not show the superiority. The heterogeneity was not found (before and after the PCI: P=0.44, I2 = 0%; after the PCI: P=0.89, I2 = 0%; overall: P=0.86, I2 = 0%), and the fixed-effects model was performed by the M-H test.(2) Myocardial Infraction. As for the myocardial infraction, twelve articles [34, 41, 50, 51, 76, 89, 95–100] with 993 participants received the treatment after the PCI compared with the 4 articles [43, 44, 58, 67] with 424 patients before and after the PCI (Figure 4). The result illustrated that the occurrence of myocardial infraction of the experimental group was lower than the controlled group based on the intervention of time point after the PCI (RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.87, P=0.02). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [34, 50, 51, 58, 67, 76, 89, 95–100] showed the superiority on the time point after the PCI. The heterogeneity was also not found (after the PCI: P=1.00, I2 = 0%; before and after the PCI: P=0.96, I2 = 0%; overall: P=1.00, I2 = 0%), and the fixed-effects model was performed by the M-H test.(3) Stenocardia. Twelve studies [34, 41, 46, 50, 51, 57, 89, 95, 96, 98–100] with 1,011 patients were treated after the PCI compared with the rest of four studies [39, 58, 67, 83] with 434 patients being treated before and after the PCI (Figure 5). The result showed that the occurrence of stenocardia for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group both on the two time points of intervention (after the PCI: RR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.72, P=0.0003; before and after the PCI: RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.89, P=0.02; overall: RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.66, P<0.0001). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [34, 39, 50, 51, 57, 58, 67, 89, 95, 96, 98–100] showed the superiority on the time points before and after the PCI and after the PCI. No heterogeneity was found (after the PCI: P=0.94, I2 = 0%; before and after the PCI: P=0.61, I2 = 0%; overall: P=0.97, I2 = 0%), and the fixed-effects model was performed by the M-H test.(4) Arrhythmia. Figure 6 illustrated the outcome of arrhythmia. Three studies [41, 46, 71] with 216 patients received the treatment after the PCI compared with the five studies [39, 42–44, 93] with 567 patients received the treatment before and after the PCI. The result showed that the occurrence of arrhythmia for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group on the time points before and after the PCI (RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.56, P<0.001). Both TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [39, 42, 93] and Yiqihuoxue [41, 43, 44, 46, 71] showed the superiority on the intervention of time points before and after the PCI. No heterogeneity was found (after the PCI: P=0.73, I2 = 0%; before and after the PCI: P=0.95, I2 = 0%; overall: P=0.99, I2 = 0%), and the fixed-effects model was performed by the M-H test.In a word, even though the TCMI combined with western medicine showed the advantage on some indicators of the MACE compared with western medicine alone , the result still could not recommend the best applying point of TCMI during the perioperative period of PCI for patients with ACS.


## 3.4.3. Inflammatory Factors

Figures7 and 8 illustrate the inflammatory factors (hs-CRP and IL-6) of patients with ACS after the treatment of experimental group and controlled group based on the effect of Yiqihuoxue or Liqihuoxue and the time points of intervention.Figure 7
Forest plot of hs-CRP based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.Figure 8
Forest plot of IL-6 based on the time point of intervention and the effect ofLiqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue.(1) hs-CRP. A total of 13 studies [34, 37, 45, 47, 52, 53, 59, 62, 94, 96, 98–100] with 1,249 patients were treated after the PCI compared with 8 studies [36, 39, 42, 63, 66, 67, 91, 93] with 699 patients being treated before and after the PCI (Figure 7). The result of meta-analysis indicated that the level of hs-CRP for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group (after the PCI: Std. MD = −1.95, 95% CI = −2.53 to −1.38, P<0.001; before and after the PCI: Std. MD = −1.65, 95% CI = −2.19 to −1.11, P<0.001; overall: Std. MD = −1.77, 95% CI = −2.17 to −1.36, P<0.001). The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue [34, 36, 37, 39, 42, 52, 53, 59, 62, 63, 66, 67, 91, 93, 94, 96, 98–100] was superior to the Yiqihuoxue [45, 47] during the perioperative period of PCI. But it still could not recommend the best time point of intervention during the perioperative period of PCI. Significant statistical heterogeneity was found (after the PCI: P<0.01, I2 = 99%; before and after the PCI: P<0.01, I2 = 97%; overall: P<0.01, I2 = 98%), and the random-effects model was performed by the IV test. The subgroup analysis was applied to explore the source of heterogeneity based on the classification of area (north or south of China), level of hospitals (three A hospital or not), and sample size of studies (more than 100 or less than 100). The result indicated that the level of hospitals might was the source of heterogeneity (see Figures S3–S5 in the Supplementary Materials).(2) IL-6. Seven articles [34, 35, 53, 97–100] with 556 patients received the treatment after the PCI compared with only 1 article [73] with 100 patients received the treatment before and after the PCI (Figure 8). The result showed that the IL-6 for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group on the time point after the PCI (Std. MD = −1.77, 95% CI = −2.22 to −1.31, P<0.001), and the Liqihuoxue [34, 35, 53, 73, 97–100] was the most frequent effect of TCMI in this part. Obvious heterogeneity was found (after the PCI: P<0.01, I2 = 81%; overall: P<0.01, I2 = 92%), and the random-effects model was performed by the IV test. The subgroup analysis was also conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity based on the classification of area (north or south of China), level of hospitals (three A hospital or not), and sample size of studies (more than 100 or less than 100). But the result could not reveal the source of heterogeneity (see Figures S6–S8 in the Supplementary Materials).


## 3.5. Adverse Events

From the included researches, the report of potential adverse events mainly concentrated on bleeding events [37, 46, 58, 60, 62, 95], kidney disfunction [41, 51], angina pectoris or myocardial infarction [41–43, 91, 92], arrhythmia [41–43, 46], respiratory system disfunction [41, 92], heart failure [46, 91], allergy [51, 57, 62], headache [57], digestive system disfunction [92], and dizziness [91, 92]. Although there was no evidence that adverse events were directly caused by the application of TCMI, the bleeding events including gastrointestinal and gingival bleeding, haemoptysis, puncture point hematoma, and subcutaneous congestion were the most relevant events.


## 3.6. Publication Bias

We applied the RR or MD as the midpoint to draw the funnel plot (Figure9). The publication bias was evaluated in the funnel plot by comparing the symmetry of included studies on clinical efficiency, MI, stenocardia, and hs-CRP. Each outcome indicator should include more than 10 studies. The funnel plot was symmetrical in visual for clinical efficiency, MI, and stenocardia, while not for hs-CRP. The statistical method of Egger’s and Begg’s test was conducted and further verified the publication bias by the software Stata. The results of Egger’s and Begg’s test indicated that the publication bias did not exist in clinical efficiency (Egger’s test (t = 0.05, P=0.962>0.05); Begg’s test (z = 0.25, P=0.805>0.05)) and hs-CRP (Egger’s test (t = −0.89, P=0.389>0.05); Begg’s test (z = 1.86, P=0.063>0.05)). However, the MI (Egger’s test (t = −5.73, P=0.001); Begg’s test (z = 2.60, P=0.009)) and stenocardia (Egger’s test (t = −4.08, P=0.001); Begg’s test (z = 2.28, P=0.023)) obtained the publication bias (see Figures S9–S12 in the Supplementary Materials).Figure 9
The funnel plot of (a) clinical efficiency, (b) MI, (c) stenocardia, and (d) hs-CRP.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 4. Discussion

As one of the diseases that endanger human health and life seriously, ACS has aroused extensive attention all over the world [5]. The PCI has been widely applied in the treatment of ACS, and the prognosis has dramatically improved [18]. However, some PCI-related problems, such as no-reflow, ischemia-reperfusion injury, PMI, in-stent restenosis, and stent thrombosis, are difficult to avoid. Previous research studies illustrated that TCMI had a good effect on preventing arrhythmia and reperfusion injury, improving heart function, and protecting myocardium [22]. However, there was insufficient medical evidence for the TCMI in patients with ACS based on the effective classification of Liqihuoxue and Yiqihuoxue. This study was based on the PRISMA statement, focusing on the efficacy and safety of TCMI for ACS with the effect of Yiqihuoxue or Liqihuoxue and the time points of intervention during the perioperative period of PCI. The characteristics of TCMI and the precision of intervention are well illustrated.A total of 68 articles with 6,043 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The result of meta-analysis showed that the clinical efficiency of TCMI combined with western medicine (experimental group) was superior to the western medicine alone (controlled group) on patients with ACS during the perioperative period of PCI (before the PCI, before and after the PCI, or both), and the TCMI with the effect ofLiqihuoxue was the relatively better choice. The result of MACE illustrated that the occurrence of MI, stenocardia, and arrhythmia for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group (MI and stenocardia: time points before the PCI, before and after the PCI, or both; arrhythmia: time points before and after PCI). However, the occurrence of all-cause mortality did not prove the advantage of TCMI. The TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue was the relatively better choice for the prevention of MACE based on the evaluation of classification. The result of meta-analysis for inflammatory factors showed that the level of hs-CRP and IL-6 for the experimental group was lower than the controlled group (hs-CRP: in the period of before the PCI, before and after the PCI, or both; IL-6: after the PCI) and both TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue and Yiqihuoxue has shown the superiority. The heterogeneity of some indicators (hs-CRP and IL-6) was extremely obvious, and the result of subgroup analysis indicated the level of hospitals might be the source of heterogeneity for hs-CRP. After each included study was excluded individually based on the procedure of sensitivity analysis, the majority of the combined effects were relatively close and stable.The publication bias existed in this research afterEgger’s and Begg’s tests. It might come from the following reasons: (a) some authors tended to deliver positive results to editors while prejudiced negative results [102]; (b) some editors or reviewers had a preference to positive results while cavilled to negative results to some extent [103]; (c) government funding researches had more possibilities to be published in some magazines than receiving private or company funding [104]. The meta-analysis would overstate the degree of association between treating effects and risk factors because of the publication bias, bringing mistakes for clinical therapy or health decision-making.Numerous previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been published to confirm the clinical efficacy and safety of TCM for the treatment of CHD. However, there still remained some problems. Firstly, some of them only focused on the broad category of CHD without evaluating the specific type of disease, leading to the restriction of clinical application [105, 106]. Secondly, some of them did not classify the category and dosage of TCM, leading to more confounding factors and high risk of bias [107]. Thirdly, some studies did not highlight the precise time point of intervention for TCMI during the perioperative period of PCI [108, 109]. Compared with previous research studies, the characteristics of our research were clearly classification of TCMI (the effect of Yiqihuoxue and Liqihuoxue), accurate selection of disease types from the CHD, and precise time point of intervention during the perioperative period of PCI (before the PCI, before and after the PCI, after the PCI, and overall).It should be noted that some limitations did exist as follows. Firstly, all included studies were conducted in different hospitals in China, which might bring the regional and cultural bias based on the different clinical abilities of ACS diagnosis and PCI treatment. Secondly, the included RCTs had flaws caused by human baseline risk factors (all patients were Chinese), incomplete methodological design of trials (lack of blinding method), and small sample size (less than 30 patients per group). Thirdly, some results showed significant heterogeneity, which might be due to the sample size, the different experimental regions in China, medicine application and dose, publication years, and the duration of treatment. The lower quality of included RCTs restricted the promotion of evidence. Fourthly, the random-effects model was established to pool data, which might not provide the exact and stable conclusion based on this situation.The report of adverse events of TCM, including the TCMI, has always been a hotspot issue in clinical practice. Recently published retrospective research, which reviewed the data from 10,000 heart failure patients, found that Salvia miltiorrhiza/Danshen might increase the risk of bleeding and death [110]. Some articles emphasized that the occurrence of adverse events was actually related to the nonstandardized use of Chinese medicine in western medical hospitals so that the clinical value of TCM should not be negated completely. The precise treatment and safety evaluation of TCM are essential for the development of TCM, and this meta-analysis could provide evidence-based support and guidance.


## 5. Conclusions

Our research provides a beneficial and promising result for the application of TCMI (Liqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue) combined with western medicine on patients with ACS during the perioperative period of PCI. This combined therapy can provide assistance for improving clinical efficiency, reducing the incidence rate of MACE, and lowering the level of inflammatory factors. We did not find the optimal time point of intervention during the perioperative period of PCI. Although the application of TCMI with the effect of Liqihuoxue obtained support from this research, the effect of Liqihuoxue or Yiqihuoxue for TCMI still needs more evidence from the standard, multicentre, double-blind RCTs in the future. The precise application of TCMI during the perioperative period of PCI will be one of the new directions for TCM in the future.



---

*Source: 3834128-2020-05-19.xml*