# Single Feed Aperture-Coupled Wideband Dielectric Resonator Antenna with Circular Polarization for Ku-Band Applications

Authors: Joshua M. Patin; Satish K. Sharma
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

A novel single feed aperture-coupled wideband dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) exhibiting righ-handed circular polarization (RHCP) operating in the Ku-band frequency range is presented. The aperture-coupled single feed design utilizes back-side microstrip excitation through a novel bow-tie-shaped cross-slots in the ground plane. Extensive simulation parametric studies resulted in a 3 dB axial ratio (AR) bandwidth of 17.24% at a center frequency of 13 GHz, where the dielectric resonator is excited in its HEM11δ resonant mode. A prototype DRA was fabricated with some limitations and experimentally verified for the impedance matching and radiation patterns showing circular polarization.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dielectric resonator antennas (DRAs) were first discovered in 1983 by Long et al., and since then they have been widely studied [1]. Their inherent features of high radiation efficiency, ease of excitation, compactness, and ability to obtain radiation patterns using different excitation modes offer much to an antenna application [2]. Furthermore, the shape of a DRA can be custom, resulting in favorable operating modes or polarizations. The DRAs supporting circular polarizations have been studied and can be found in the literature. Traditionally, circular polarization is achieved using quadrature couplers and elaborate feed systems which can also be done with DRAs as well [3, 4]. The design in [4] is unique in using a dual mode dielectric resonator (DR) excited by vertical strips fed in quadrature, while [3] uses an underlaid hybrid coupler. Furthermore, four DRA arrays can be excited using sequential rotation to obtain wide axial ratio bandwidths [5].Single feed excited DRAs providing circular polarization are typically more desirable due to their simple geometry and are also more challenging to obtain wide axial ratio bandwidths. A half cylinder circular sector DRA on a ground plane was demonstrated to provide single feed circular polarization 3 dB axial ratio (AR) bandwidth of 10%  [6]. This design uses tuned probe feed placement which excites the two spatially orthogonal modes in quadrature phase to achieve the circular polarization.  Another more recent design utilizes a complex configuration of an upside-down rectangular stair-shaped DRA excited by a microstrip through a rotated 45° slot to achieve circular polarization [7]. This design was able to achieve 10.6% 3 dB AR bandwidth; however, it requires a complex DRA shape and precise registration of the DRA with respect to the slot in order to achieve the performance.One common method for achieving the spatially orthogonal modes for circular polarization is to use crossed slots in the ground plane excited by a microstrip transmission line. In this configuration, the crossed slots are at 90° with respect to (w.r.t.) each other and are both at 45° w.r.t. the back-side microstrip line. An optimization of this topology was presented in [1], where offsetting each slot from the end of the microstrip line (thereby having the slot’s intersection off from DR center) allows for AR bandwidths up to 4.7% at broadside angle (θ=0°). This design excites the fundamental HEM11δ mode at 5.7 GHz, where the lengths of slots and distance of slots to the end of the microstrip line are tuned for the optimized performance. In [8], a trapezoidal DRA is presented which offers wideband circular polarization performance. In [9], simulated results on a dual band single feed excited cylindrical DRA are discussed which provides both linear and circular polarizations. However, in this paper, investigation results on a single feed excited single wideband cylindrical DRA is presented which further enhances the design concept in [1] by using a novel bow-tie-shaped slot to increase the AR bandwidth to 17.24% at Ku-band frequencies.


## 2. DRA Geometry

The aperture-coupled excited DRA through the bow-tie cross-slots was designed and simulated using Ansoft’s High Frequency Structural Simulator (HFSS) and is shown in Figure1. The DRA consists of an end-launched SMA excited by a 50Ω microstrip transmission line with stub on the backside of a low-loss substrate (Rogers Duroid 5880, εr=2.20), the bow-tie cross-slots in the ground plane, and the DR on top of the slots. The dimensions of the cross-slots, the DR, and the ground plane determining the antenna performance are labeled in Figure 1. The slot widths at the center of the bow-tie and the ends of the slots are 0.1 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively, with the length of slot 1 and slot 2 being 3.4 mm and 4.65 mm, respectively.  The slots are centered with each other and with the DR in the ground plane and substrate.  The substrate is 33 mm × 33 mm, 32 mil (0.7874 mm) thick, and is made out of Rogers Duroid 5880TM (εr=2.20). The backside of the substrate has a 50Ω microstrip transmission line with a small stub of 2 mm × 4 mm  at the end which aids in the impedance matching. The DR is made out of Rogers TMM10 material (εr=9.20). The resonator is cylindrical with a radius of 6 mm and a height of 2.12 mm.Figure 1
Geometry of the DRA displaying various components.The DR is excited in the fundamental HEM11δ mode. The E-Field vectors clearly displaying the excited HEM11δ mode are shown in Figure 2. In the configuration shown in Figure 1, the antenna has right hand circular polarization (RHCP) since slot 2 is longer than slot 1. The RHCP operation of the DRA is clearly illustrated in Figures 3(a)–3(c), where the field rotates circularly with phase.Figure 2
E-Field vectors showing HEM11δ mode of DRA.E-Fields rotating from 0° (a), to 90° (b), to 180° (c), showing mechanism of RHCP operation.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3. Simulated DRA Performance

### 3.1. Parametric Studies

Extensive parametric studies were conducted on an early variant of the final design in order to understand how best to tune for wide axial ratio (AR) bandwidth, and impedance matching. Although this study incorporated eight parameters, the most prominent and useful were the cross-slot lengthsL1 and L2, the slot start widths WS1 and WS2, slot end widths We1 and We2. These parameters are shown graphically in Figure 4 for clarity.Figure 4
DRA with labels showing important design parameters.


#### 3.1.1. Slot Lengths

The DRA is excited from the backside microstrip line, through the bow-tie cross-slots, where their physical dimensions play a critical role in proper DRA excitation. The slots were modified one at a time to isolate each slot’s effect on the antenna performance.L1 was swept from 3.13 mm to 3.53 mm in 0.1 mm steps, while L2 was swept from 4.24 mm to 4.64 mm in 0.1 mm increments.The length of slot 1,L1, has a pronounced effect on both impedance match (S11) and axial ratio versus frequency, as shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b). Due to its shorter length, L1 dominates the higher frequency resonance seen in the impedance match (S11) plot of Figure 5(a). As L1 is increased, the CP performance moves down in frequency, while spanning a smaller frequency band, and the input impedance is better matched at the lower frequencies under this condition. As the length is decreased, there is a point where optimal axial ratio bandwidth is achieved as the two resonances of the antenna even out giving the largest bandwidth. The antenna loses matching at the lower frequency band while the upper part of the impedance match moves up in frequency.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of  L1, slot 1 length.
(a)
(b)The length of slot 2,L2, does not exhibit the same controlled characteristics over the antenna's AR performance. As shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b), as L2 is decreased, the antenna impedance match improves, but the AR performance is degraded. The variation of AR is not as great as from varying L1. Due to its larger size, L2 dominates the lower frequency resonance in this design.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of L2, slot 2 length.
(a)
(b)


#### 3.1.2. Slot Start Widths

Next, the bow-tie slot’s starting widths,WS1 and WS2, were swept independently from 0 mm to 0.2 mm in 0.05 mm increments. While one slot was modified, the other was set at 0.1 mm. The results from this study are summarized in Figures 7(a) and 7(b) for WS1 and Figures 8(a) and 8(b) for WS2. The results from this study are similar to the slot length study conducted earlier. From Figures 7(a) and 8(a), it is apparent that modifying slot 1 affects the upper resonance and slot 2 affects the lower resonance. An interesting note here is that increasing WS1 causes the resonance in S11 to move up in frequency. Increasing WS2 causes the lower resonance to become more pronounced, improving match, while axial ratio (AR) suffers. In this study, variation on WS2 does not have the same magnitude of effect on the AR and impedance matching as  WS1, showing that the geometry of WS1 dominates these parameters.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of WS1, slot 1 start width.
(a)
(b)(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of WS2, slot 2 start width.
(a)
(b)


#### 3.1.3. Slot End Widths

In this study, the bow-tie slot’s ending widths,We1 and We2, were swept independently from each other to discover their effects on the design. The results of this study were similar to the slot length and slot start widths in that slot 1 dominates the impedance matching and AR performance. Figures 9(a) and 9(b) display the impedance matching and AR performance versus frequency for We1, and Figures 10(a) and 10(b) display the impedance matching and AR performance versus frequency for We2. Figures 9(a) and 9(b) show that as We1 is increased, the higher frequency resonance is affected most, decreasing in frequency and narrowing the impedance bandwidth. Impedance matching bandwidth and AR bandwidth performance also decrease in frequency. A value of 0.4 mm seems to have the most symmetrical and flattest AR response, centered around 13.75 GHz, but 0.5 mm actually provides a larger AR bandwidth. As with previously discussed studies, slot 2 dominates the lower frequency resonance and has less of a pronounced impact on impedance matching and axial ratio (AR).  Figures 10(a) and 10(b) show the response for We2 for impedance match and AR bandwidths. As We2 is decreased, the lower resonance becomes more defined and impedance match improves, but AR performance slightly worsens.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of  We1, slot 1 end width.
(a)
(b)(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of  We2, slot 2 end width.
(a)
(b)


### 3.2. Final Design

The desired center frequency of operation for the DRA is 13 GHz. The parametric studies indicated that the operating frequency was closer to 13.75 GHz. This was accomplished by modifying the DR, slots, and ground plane. The DR was changed from a cylinder of radius 6.22 mm and height of 2 mm to a cylinder of radius 6 mm and height of 2.12 mm. The slot dimensions were increased from 3.33 mm to 3.4 mm for slot 1, and 4.44 mm to 4.65 mm for slot 2. The ground plane was increased from 25 mm square to 33 mm square. A 2 mm × 4 mm stub was added to the end of the microstrip line to aid in matching. These changes were driven heavily by the parametric studies and resulted in a 13 GHz center frequency, 17.24% 3 dB axial ratio (AR) bandwidth, and 35.3% largest continuous impedance bandwidth.


#### 3.2.1. Impedance and Axial Ratio Bandwidths

The DRA achieves acceptable impedance matching, axial ratios, and gain for the RHCP band.  TheS11 plot for the antenna is shown in Figure 11(a), and the AR plot is shown in Figure 11(b).  Figure 11(a) shows the −10 dB matching to be in two areas, from 10.28 GHz to 11.15 GHz (8.1%), and then from 11.5 GHz to 16.48 GHz (35.3%). Attempts to match the entire band resulted in degraded antenna performance on other metrics, such as axial ratio bandwidth and gain.  Figure 11(b) illustrates the AR over frequency, where AR is computed at θ = 0°. This plot shows the CP region spanning from 11.82 GHz to 14.05 GHz, defined by less than 3 dB AR, which accounts to 17.2% fractional bandwidth while impedance matched better than S11 = −10 dB.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for simulated final DRA design.
(a)
(b)


#### 3.2.2. Gain and Efficiency

The radiation efficiency versus frequency for the DRA is shown in Figure12(a), where the RHCP band exhibits radiation efficiencies ranging from 96.2% to 97.4%. The gain versus frequency plot in Figure 12(b) displays positive gain (dBic) throughout the RHCP band. Clearly the RHCP and LHCP gain plots show how the antenna changes from being almost linearly polarized around 10.55 GHz with both RHCP and LHCP being nearly equal, to RHCP at 13 GHz as the LHCP gain degrades to below −10 dBic.Radiation efficiency (a) and CP gain (b) versus frequency.
(a)
(b)


#### 3.2.3. Radiation Pattern Performance

The radiation patterns were studied over the frequency bandwidth of interest and are shown in Figures13(a)–13(c) at 12 GHz, 13 GHz, and 14 GHz within the bandwidth, respectively. At 12 GHz, the bottom of the CP band, the DRA exhibits a 3 dB beamwidth of 105.5° with an 11.4 dB front-to-back (F/B) ratio. The maximum gain found at θ = 0° is 4.16 dBic. At 13 GHz, the center of the CP band, the DRA exhibits a 3 dB beamwidth of 117° with a front-to-back (F/B) ratio of 17.4 dB. The maximum gain found at θ = 0° is 4.7 dBic. Similarly, at 14 GHz, the top of the RHCP band, the 3 dB beamwidth is 134.5° with a 15.45 dB front-to-back (F/B) ratio.  The maximum gain found at θ = 0° is 3.82 dBic, which is somewhat lower than the other two frequencies in this band because cross-polarization LHCP component is slightly higher than other two frequencies.RHPC radiation pattern for (a) 12 GHz, (b) 13 GHz, and (c) 14 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.1. Parametric Studies

Extensive parametric studies were conducted on an early variant of the final design in order to understand how best to tune for wide axial ratio (AR) bandwidth, and impedance matching. Although this study incorporated eight parameters, the most prominent and useful were the cross-slot lengthsL1 and L2, the slot start widths WS1 and WS2, slot end widths We1 and We2. These parameters are shown graphically in Figure 4 for clarity.Figure 4
DRA with labels showing important design parameters.


### 3.1.1. Slot Lengths

The DRA is excited from the backside microstrip line, through the bow-tie cross-slots, where their physical dimensions play a critical role in proper DRA excitation. The slots were modified one at a time to isolate each slot’s effect on the antenna performance.L1 was swept from 3.13 mm to 3.53 mm in 0.1 mm steps, while L2 was swept from 4.24 mm to 4.64 mm in 0.1 mm increments.The length of slot 1,L1, has a pronounced effect on both impedance match (S11) and axial ratio versus frequency, as shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b). Due to its shorter length, L1 dominates the higher frequency resonance seen in the impedance match (S11) plot of Figure 5(a). As L1 is increased, the CP performance moves down in frequency, while spanning a smaller frequency band, and the input impedance is better matched at the lower frequencies under this condition. As the length is decreased, there is a point where optimal axial ratio bandwidth is achieved as the two resonances of the antenna even out giving the largest bandwidth. The antenna loses matching at the lower frequency band while the upper part of the impedance match moves up in frequency.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of  L1, slot 1 length.
(a)
(b)The length of slot 2,L2, does not exhibit the same controlled characteristics over the antenna's AR performance. As shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b), as L2 is decreased, the antenna impedance match improves, but the AR performance is degraded. The variation of AR is not as great as from varying L1. Due to its larger size, L2 dominates the lower frequency resonance in this design.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of L2, slot 2 length.
(a)
(b)


### 3.1.2. Slot Start Widths

Next, the bow-tie slot’s starting widths,WS1 and WS2, were swept independently from 0 mm to 0.2 mm in 0.05 mm increments. While one slot was modified, the other was set at 0.1 mm. The results from this study are summarized in Figures 7(a) and 7(b) for WS1 and Figures 8(a) and 8(b) for WS2. The results from this study are similar to the slot length study conducted earlier. From Figures 7(a) and 8(a), it is apparent that modifying slot 1 affects the upper resonance and slot 2 affects the lower resonance. An interesting note here is that increasing WS1 causes the resonance in S11 to move up in frequency. Increasing WS2 causes the lower resonance to become more pronounced, improving match, while axial ratio (AR) suffers. In this study, variation on WS2 does not have the same magnitude of effect on the AR and impedance matching as  WS1, showing that the geometry of WS1 dominates these parameters.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of WS1, slot 1 start width.
(a)
(b)(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of WS2, slot 2 start width.
(a)
(b)


### 3.1.3. Slot End Widths

In this study, the bow-tie slot’s ending widths,We1 and We2, were swept independently from each other to discover their effects on the design. The results of this study were similar to the slot length and slot start widths in that slot 1 dominates the impedance matching and AR performance. Figures 9(a) and 9(b) display the impedance matching and AR performance versus frequency for We1, and Figures 10(a) and 10(b) display the impedance matching and AR performance versus frequency for We2. Figures 9(a) and 9(b) show that as We1 is increased, the higher frequency resonance is affected most, decreasing in frequency and narrowing the impedance bandwidth. Impedance matching bandwidth and AR bandwidth performance also decrease in frequency. A value of 0.4 mm seems to have the most symmetrical and flattest AR response, centered around 13.75 GHz, but 0.5 mm actually provides a larger AR bandwidth. As with previously discussed studies, slot 2 dominates the lower frequency resonance and has less of a pronounced impact on impedance matching and axial ratio (AR).  Figures 10(a) and 10(b) show the response for We2 for impedance match and AR bandwidths. As We2 is decreased, the lower resonance becomes more defined and impedance match improves, but AR performance slightly worsens.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of  We1, slot 1 end width.
(a)
(b)(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of  We2, slot 2 end width.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1.1. Slot Lengths

The DRA is excited from the backside microstrip line, through the bow-tie cross-slots, where their physical dimensions play a critical role in proper DRA excitation. The slots were modified one at a time to isolate each slot’s effect on the antenna performance.L1 was swept from 3.13 mm to 3.53 mm in 0.1 mm steps, while L2 was swept from 4.24 mm to 4.64 mm in 0.1 mm increments.The length of slot 1,L1, has a pronounced effect on both impedance match (S11) and axial ratio versus frequency, as shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b). Due to its shorter length, L1 dominates the higher frequency resonance seen in the impedance match (S11) plot of Figure 5(a). As L1 is increased, the CP performance moves down in frequency, while spanning a smaller frequency band, and the input impedance is better matched at the lower frequencies under this condition. As the length is decreased, there is a point where optimal axial ratio bandwidth is achieved as the two resonances of the antenna even out giving the largest bandwidth. The antenna loses matching at the lower frequency band while the upper part of the impedance match moves up in frequency.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of  L1, slot 1 length.
(a)
(b)The length of slot 2,L2, does not exhibit the same controlled characteristics over the antenna's AR performance. As shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b), as L2 is decreased, the antenna impedance match improves, but the AR performance is degraded. The variation of AR is not as great as from varying L1. Due to its larger size, L2 dominates the lower frequency resonance in this design.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of L2, slot 2 length.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1.2. Slot Start Widths

Next, the bow-tie slot’s starting widths,WS1 and WS2, were swept independently from 0 mm to 0.2 mm in 0.05 mm increments. While one slot was modified, the other was set at 0.1 mm. The results from this study are summarized in Figures 7(a) and 7(b) for WS1 and Figures 8(a) and 8(b) for WS2. The results from this study are similar to the slot length study conducted earlier. From Figures 7(a) and 8(a), it is apparent that modifying slot 1 affects the upper resonance and slot 2 affects the lower resonance. An interesting note here is that increasing WS1 causes the resonance in S11 to move up in frequency. Increasing WS2 causes the lower resonance to become more pronounced, improving match, while axial ratio (AR) suffers. In this study, variation on WS2 does not have the same magnitude of effect on the AR and impedance matching as  WS1, showing that the geometry of WS1 dominates these parameters.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of WS1, slot 1 start width.
(a)
(b)(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of WS2, slot 2 start width.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1.3. Slot End Widths

In this study, the bow-tie slot’s ending widths,We1 and We2, were swept independently from each other to discover their effects on the design. The results of this study were similar to the slot length and slot start widths in that slot 1 dominates the impedance matching and AR performance. Figures 9(a) and 9(b) display the impedance matching and AR performance versus frequency for We1, and Figures 10(a) and 10(b) display the impedance matching and AR performance versus frequency for We2. Figures 9(a) and 9(b) show that as We1 is increased, the higher frequency resonance is affected most, decreasing in frequency and narrowing the impedance bandwidth. Impedance matching bandwidth and AR bandwidth performance also decrease in frequency. A value of 0.4 mm seems to have the most symmetrical and flattest AR response, centered around 13.75 GHz, but 0.5 mm actually provides a larger AR bandwidth. As with previously discussed studies, slot 2 dominates the lower frequency resonance and has less of a pronounced impact on impedance matching and axial ratio (AR).  Figures 10(a) and 10(b) show the response for We2 for impedance match and AR bandwidths. As We2 is decreased, the lower resonance becomes more defined and impedance match improves, but AR performance slightly worsens.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of  We1, slot 1 end width.
(a)
(b)(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for variation of  We2, slot 2 end width.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2. Final Design

The desired center frequency of operation for the DRA is 13 GHz. The parametric studies indicated that the operating frequency was closer to 13.75 GHz. This was accomplished by modifying the DR, slots, and ground plane. The DR was changed from a cylinder of radius 6.22 mm and height of 2 mm to a cylinder of radius 6 mm and height of 2.12 mm. The slot dimensions were increased from 3.33 mm to 3.4 mm for slot 1, and 4.44 mm to 4.65 mm for slot 2. The ground plane was increased from 25 mm square to 33 mm square. A 2 mm × 4 mm stub was added to the end of the microstrip line to aid in matching. These changes were driven heavily by the parametric studies and resulted in a 13 GHz center frequency, 17.24% 3 dB axial ratio (AR) bandwidth, and 35.3% largest continuous impedance bandwidth.


### 3.2.1. Impedance and Axial Ratio Bandwidths

The DRA achieves acceptable impedance matching, axial ratios, and gain for the RHCP band.  TheS11 plot for the antenna is shown in Figure 11(a), and the AR plot is shown in Figure 11(b).  Figure 11(a) shows the −10 dB matching to be in two areas, from 10.28 GHz to 11.15 GHz (8.1%), and then from 11.5 GHz to 16.48 GHz (35.3%). Attempts to match the entire band resulted in degraded antenna performance on other metrics, such as axial ratio bandwidth and gain.  Figure 11(b) illustrates the AR over frequency, where AR is computed at θ = 0°. This plot shows the CP region spanning from 11.82 GHz to 14.05 GHz, defined by less than 3 dB AR, which accounts to 17.2% fractional bandwidth while impedance matched better than S11 = −10 dB.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for simulated final DRA design.
(a)
(b)


### 3.2.2. Gain and Efficiency

The radiation efficiency versus frequency for the DRA is shown in Figure12(a), where the RHCP band exhibits radiation efficiencies ranging from 96.2% to 97.4%. The gain versus frequency plot in Figure 12(b) displays positive gain (dBic) throughout the RHCP band. Clearly the RHCP and LHCP gain plots show how the antenna changes from being almost linearly polarized around 10.55 GHz with both RHCP and LHCP being nearly equal, to RHCP at 13 GHz as the LHCP gain degrades to below −10 dBic.Radiation efficiency (a) and CP gain (b) versus frequency.
(a)
(b)


### 3.2.3. Radiation Pattern Performance

The radiation patterns were studied over the frequency bandwidth of interest and are shown in Figures13(a)–13(c) at 12 GHz, 13 GHz, and 14 GHz within the bandwidth, respectively. At 12 GHz, the bottom of the CP band, the DRA exhibits a 3 dB beamwidth of 105.5° with an 11.4 dB front-to-back (F/B) ratio. The maximum gain found at θ = 0° is 4.16 dBic. At 13 GHz, the center of the CP band, the DRA exhibits a 3 dB beamwidth of 117° with a front-to-back (F/B) ratio of 17.4 dB. The maximum gain found at θ = 0° is 4.7 dBic. Similarly, at 14 GHz, the top of the RHCP band, the 3 dB beamwidth is 134.5° with a 15.45 dB front-to-back (F/B) ratio.  The maximum gain found at θ = 0° is 3.82 dBic, which is somewhat lower than the other two frequencies in this band because cross-polarization LHCP component is slightly higher than other two frequencies.RHPC radiation pattern for (a) 12 GHz, (b) 13 GHz, and (c) 14 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.2.1. Impedance and Axial Ratio Bandwidths

The DRA achieves acceptable impedance matching, axial ratios, and gain for the RHCP band.  TheS11 plot for the antenna is shown in Figure 11(a), and the AR plot is shown in Figure 11(b).  Figure 11(a) shows the −10 dB matching to be in two areas, from 10.28 GHz to 11.15 GHz (8.1%), and then from 11.5 GHz to 16.48 GHz (35.3%). Attempts to match the entire band resulted in degraded antenna performance on other metrics, such as axial ratio bandwidth and gain.  Figure 11(b) illustrates the AR over frequency, where AR is computed at θ = 0°. This plot shows the CP region spanning from 11.82 GHz to 14.05 GHz, defined by less than 3 dB AR, which accounts to 17.2% fractional bandwidth while impedance matched better than S11 = −10 dB.(a) Reflection coefficient magnitude (S11), and (b) axial ratio versus frequency for simulated final DRA design.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2.2. Gain and Efficiency

The radiation efficiency versus frequency for the DRA is shown in Figure12(a), where the RHCP band exhibits radiation efficiencies ranging from 96.2% to 97.4%. The gain versus frequency plot in Figure 12(b) displays positive gain (dBic) throughout the RHCP band. Clearly the RHCP and LHCP gain plots show how the antenna changes from being almost linearly polarized around 10.55 GHz with both RHCP and LHCP being nearly equal, to RHCP at 13 GHz as the LHCP gain degrades to below −10 dBic.Radiation efficiency (a) and CP gain (b) versus frequency.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2.3. Radiation Pattern Performance

The radiation patterns were studied over the frequency bandwidth of interest and are shown in Figures13(a)–13(c) at 12 GHz, 13 GHz, and 14 GHz within the bandwidth, respectively. At 12 GHz, the bottom of the CP band, the DRA exhibits a 3 dB beamwidth of 105.5° with an 11.4 dB front-to-back (F/B) ratio. The maximum gain found at θ = 0° is 4.16 dBic. At 13 GHz, the center of the CP band, the DRA exhibits a 3 dB beamwidth of 117° with a front-to-back (F/B) ratio of 17.4 dB. The maximum gain found at θ = 0° is 4.7 dBic. Similarly, at 14 GHz, the top of the RHCP band, the 3 dB beamwidth is 134.5° with a 15.45 dB front-to-back (F/B) ratio.  The maximum gain found at θ = 0° is 3.82 dBic, which is somewhat lower than the other two frequencies in this band because cross-polarization LHCP component is slightly higher than other two frequencies.RHPC radiation pattern for (a) 12 GHz, (b) 13 GHz, and (c) 14 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 4. Experimental Verifications

The antenna was challenging to fabricate due to its small size and high frequency, making it sensitive to physical variations from the simulated design. A best attempt was made at milling the Rogers TMM10 dielectric material of thickness 2.54 mm for achieving the DR with height of 2.12 mm, while an LPKF milling machine was used to route the substrate and microstrip transmission line from the Rogers Duroid 5880TM including the bow-tie cross-slots. The next challenge was in aligning the DR on top of the cross-slots, which was done by drawing cross points, both on the DR and cross-slots using a fine point marker pen. The DR was glued using regular permanent glue with unknown electrical properties. However, it seems some misalignment appeared in doing so, which appears difficult to fix manually at Ku-band frequency (13 GHz). Photographs of the fabricated prototype antenna is shown in Figures14(a) and 14(b) for the top and bottom views of the antenna, respectively.Photographs of the fabricated D showing top and bottom views.
(a)
(b)The fabricated antenna performance is shown in Figures15 and 16. The impedance plot in Figure 15 illustrates the measured versus simulated reflection coefficient magnitude (S11) performance for the DRA. It is clear that some matching is obtained close to the band of interest, but some variation exists especially in the higher frequency above 13.5 GHz. From Figure 15, the fabricated antenna appears to be shifted down in frequency by nearly 1 GHz from the simulation result. In addition, frequencies between 11.5 GHz and 12.5 GHz are showing matching level approaching S11 = −9 dB, which can be attributed to the fabrication errors.Figure 15
Simulated and measured reflection coefficient magnitudes (S11).Radiation pattern for the fabricated DRA at (a) 11.5 GHz, (b) 12 GHz,  and (c) 12.5 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figures16(a)–16(c) show radiation patterns at 11.5 GHz, 12 GHz, and 12.5 GHz, respectively. The radiation pattern measurements were made using a continuously rotating linear polarized Satimo broadband horn calibrated for the band of operation in the Antenna and Microwave Laboratory (AML) at San Diego State University. These measurements show acceptable circular polarized (CP) patterns with axial ratio within 3 dB limit at the broadside angle.  Further, it confirms the operation of the fabricated antenna at a lower frequency than the expected simulated frequencies which are attributed to the fabrication errors.


## 5. Conclusions

An aperture-coupled RHCP DRA operating in Ku-band has been presented which is driven from a single feed and excited through a novel bow-tie cross-slots. Extensive parametric studies were conducted which identified important tuning parameters aside from the standard DR dimension sensitivities. The DRA was then tuned for 13 GHz center frequency operation providing a 3 dB axial ratio (AR) bandwidth of 17.24% while −10 dB matching criteria are met. The simulated radiation patterns show acceptable co- and crosspolarization separation over the AR band. The DRA was fabricated and tested using rotating linear polarization method. The fabricated DRA exhibited operation centered around 12 GHz, with acceptable circularly polarized radiation patterns. The difference in simulated and measured performance of the antenna is   primarily attributed to manufacturing errors of the DR and its misalignment on the cross-slots. This DRA can find applications in Ku-band-based satellite communication applications.



---

*Source: 378798-2012-06-12.xml*