# Investigations on Oil Flow Rates Projected on the Casing Walls by Splashed Lubricated Gears

Authors: G. Leprince; C. Changenet; F. Ville; P. Velex
Journal: Advances in Tribology
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

In order to investigate the oil projected by gears rotating in an oil bath, a test rig has been set up in which the quantity of lubricant splashed at several locations on the casing walls can be measured. An oblong-shaped window of variable size is connected to a tank for flow measurements, and the system can be placed at several locations. A series of formulae have been deduced using dimensional analysis which can predict the lubricant flow rate generated by one spur gear or one disk at various places on the casing. These results have been experimentally validated over a wide range of operating conditions (rotational speed, geometry, immersion depth, etc.).


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Splash lubrication is traditionally used in low- to medium-speed enclosed gears such as automotive gearboxes in which the lubricant is projected by the rotation of the gears. The main disadvantages are (i) the generation of significant power losses by churning and (ii) the absence of precise control in terms of lubricant supply. Based on a number of studies [1–10], there is general agreement on the fact that losses increase with rotational speed and immersion depth. Although lubricant churning can be considered as a major source of power loss in gearboxes, splash lubrication also contributes to the regulation of gear bulk temperature since some heat is removed from the tooth faces by centrifugal fling-off as demonstrated by Blok [11]. Using a general thermal model of an automotive manual gearbox, Changenet et al. [12] have confirmed the influence of the heat exchanges between the oil sump and several rotating elements on the global thermal behaviour and emphasized, in particular, the role of the immersion depth. Höhn et al. [13] have conducted a number of experiments showing that lowering the oil level in the sump reduces churning losses but also leads to higher gear bulk temperatures. These results have been theoretically confirmed by Durand de Gevigney et al. [14].From the above-mentioned studies, it seems possible to define an optimal lubricant level in the sump in order to reduce churning losses and, from a thermal viewpoint, ensure satisfactory gear-lubricant heat exchanges. However, as far as the authors know, the influence of the oil level on the lubricant circulation and flow has received scant attention in the open literature despite the practical importance of ensuring sufficient lubrication and cooling of sensitive elements such as bearings. Because of its intrinsically chaotic nature, splash lubrication properties are hardly predictable and a lot of the development for this lubrication technique relies on a trial-and-error approach. In automotive applications, for example, casings with transparent walls are frequently employed in order to try to visualize the oil flow for a variety of operating conditions (rotational speeds, engaged gears, etc.). Such empirical methods are expensive and cannot be used at the early stages of design thus emphasizing the interest of studies aimed at predicting the volumes and spatial distributions of projected lubricant in a gearbox. In this paper, a methodology is proposed which makes it possible to estimate the amount of lubricant projected at several positions on the casing. To this end, a specific test rig has been exploited, and some general formulae are presented based on dimensional analysis.


## 2. Test Rig

The test rig developed to study churning losses and described in [7] has been modified in order to measure the oil flow rates projected on the casing walls. The pinion shaft is operated by an electric motor via a belt multiplying the rotational speed up to 7150 rpm. One of the faces of the oil sump is made of Plexiglas, and a tank has been placed in the housing to catch a part of the oil projected by the gear teeth due to centrifugal fling-off. To this end, an oblong-shaped window was drilled in the tank, and a level sensor is used to measure the time needed to fill a given volume (192 mL here) (Figure 1). In order to avoid the measurement uncertainties possibly induced by the more or less turbulent flows in the tank, a dividing wall has been introduced to separate the entry area from the measurement area in which the lubricant is far less agitated and levels can actually be read.Figure 1
Oil tank in churning test rig.The hydraulic circuit in Figure2 simultaneously enables the housing to be filled with oil and the tank to be drained when the sensor reaches the high-level detection threshold. Since measurements have to be carried out at a constant gear immersion depth, the oil in the tank is pumped and then injected into the casing (pump number 2). Finally, pump number 1 is used to fill the reservoir with lubricant at a set level.Figure 2
Hydraulic circuit.The oil tank positioning is defined in Figure3. Length L corresponds to the distance between the gear axis of rotation and the tank which can be varied up to a maximum of 130 mm. H is the height of the window from the axis of rotation which can be changed between 0 and 115 mm (the latter corresponding to the case of a completely obstructed window). The width of the window is equal to 40 mm and the rotating gear is axially centred with respect to the tank.Figure 3
Definition of oil tank location.The results presented in this paper are limited to the disks and spur gears defined in Table1. Experiments were conducted with two different fluids: water and a mineral oil (ν at 40°C = 45.11 Cst − ν at 100°C = 7.75 Cst − ρ at 21°C = 885 kg/m3).Table 1
Gear and disk data.
Gear 1
Gear 2
Gear 3
Gear 4
Disk 1
Disk 2
Module (mm)
1.5
3
5
3
/
/
Number of teeth
102
53
30
30
/
/
Face width (mm)
14
24
24
24
25
1
Outside diameter (mm)
156
165
165
96
161
160


## 3. Validity of the Measurements

Splash lubrication generates free surface flows characterised by wave trains created by the gear rotation which travel at certain speeds at the lubricant-air interface typical of transient flows. In such conditions, the number of data measurements has to be assessed in order to define a reliable experimental procedure. A number of measurements were performed for a range of operating conditions (gear geometry, rotational speed, tank location etc.) and various data acquisitions. Figure4 presents some typical results using gear 1 partly immersed (relative immersion = h/Rp=0.3) at 1500 rpm and for a tank location defined such that H=10 mm and L=110 mm. Any individual acquisition corresponds to the complete cycle for filling and emptying the tank. It can be observed that, as the number of acquisitions increases, temperature increases too because of the power losses by churning which, in turn, influence the quantity of projected lubricant by centrifugal fling-off. In order to eliminate this influence in the analysis, all the results presented in this paper correspond to measurements based on 50 data acquisitions.Figure 4
Influence of the number of acquisitions on flow rate measurement.In order to analyse the reliability of the test machine, measurements were performed at various rotational speeds. Table2 presents three series of tests carried out with gear 1 for the following tank location: H=20 mm and L=105 mm. The results show that the maximum relative deviation in flow rate is about 8% which, considering the whole range of tests, corresponds to an average standard deviation of 4.9 mL/s. Compared with the nominal flow rates which generally lie between 50 and 200 mL/s, the standard deviation is considered as sufficiently small and the experimental results as acceptable. Finally, the uncertainty on the volume measured by the two sensors was found to be around 2 mL leading to an error of 1%.Table 2
Reliability of measurements.
N (rpm)
Flow rate (mL/s)
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Mean value
Standard deviation
500
174
168
166
169.3
4.16
1000
119
118
119
118.7
0.58
2000
86
88
93
89
3.61
3000
79
80
81
80
1.00


## 4. Experimental Results

Figure5 shows the flow rate evolutions versus rotational speed obtained for gear 2 with a relative immersion depth of 0.25 and three different tank locations characterised by L=130 mm and H between 10 and 30 mm.Figure 5
Typical evolutions of oil flow rates.As expected, Figure5 shows that the flow rate received depends on the position on the wall and it can be noticed that a pinion rotating partly in oil does not behave as a gear pump since the flow rate does not vary linearly with the rotational speed. The curves in Figure 5 also reveal the existence of two flow regimes with a transition around 1500 rpm, above which the flow rate is nearly constant with speed (constant depending on geometry) whereas, at lower speeds, the flow decreases as speed increases. These results can be explained as follows:(i)
At low rotational speeds, near 500 rpm, a significant amount of lubricant is located at the gear periphery and moves with it so that large quantities of lubricant can be expelled and reach certain places on the walls if they are sufficiently close to the gear.(ii)
At higher rotational speeds, centrifugal forces become predominant, no bulk fluid motion occurs but the lubricant is sprayed in a large cone and only a fraction of it can reach the aperture of the measuring device.(iii)
It has also to be noticed that, below 300 rpm, no lubricant can enter the tank whereas, between 300 and 500 rpm, the intertooth spaces are filled with oil and the flow rate increases with speed.These observations have been confirmed with other geometries. For example, Figure6 shows the flow rate evolutions versus rotational speed obtained for disk 1 with a relative immersion depth of 0.25 and two different tank locations characterised by L=130 mm and H between 20 and 40 mm. The results in this figure confirm the presence of a transition point around 1500 rpm, above which the oil flow rate becomes nearly constant versus speed. Experiments were also performed at 6000 rpm in order to verify that this result remains the same at higher rotational speeds.Figure 6
oil flow rates with a disk.In order to identify the relevant parameters with regard to the volume of oil projected by a rotating pinion on the casing walls, some specific tests have been performed at 1500 rpm for a given tank location (L=130 mm and H=10 mm) using disks and gears. The results are synthesised in Figure 7 from which the following conclusions have been drawn:(i)
The amount of lubricant received at one given location increases with the immersion depth.(ii)
Even disks of small face-width can generate significant flow rates suggesting that both the peripheral surface and the flanks contribute.(iii)
For equivalent geometrical parameters (radius, face width), a disk and a gear generate similar flow rates from which, it can be concluded that flow rates are largely independent of the parameters related to gear geometry, such as the module or the number of teeth.(iv)
For a given operating condition, flow rates are reduced by increasing the oil temperature or alternatively replacing oil by water suggesting that the fluid physical properties, and more specifically its viscosity, are influential.Figure 7
Influential parameters on flow rate.Based on the conclusions above, it can be confirmed that the mechanism of oil projection differs from that in gear pumps. In this context, it seems interesting to investigate the hypothesis of a boundary-layer developing throughout the submerged part of a rotating disk and expelled by centrifugal forces. Theoretical flow rates can be deduced from this model and compared with the experimental evidence in order to assess the validity of this approach. Considering Figure8, the leading edge is supposed to be located at the entry in the sump and boundary layers simultaneously develop on the two flanks and the side of the disc.Figure 8
Schematic representation of the boundary layer on the side of a rotating disk.The lengthl of the boundary-layer on the peripheral surface of the disk depends on its outer radius and its immersion depth as:
(1)l=DoAcos(Do/2-hDo/2).
Using the classic assumptions for laminar flows over flat plates, the hydrodynamic-boundary-layer thickness δ is found to be proportional to the disk arc length and the associated Reynolds number, such that
(2)δ≅lRel.Since the flow velocity can be related to the peripheral speed of the rotating disk, an approximate order of magnitude of the flow rate generated by the side is(3)qside≅b2νΩDo22Acos(Do-2hDo).As noted before, the flanks of a rotating disk can substantially contribute to the total flow rate. Using a similar approach for every elemental slice of widthdr, located at a radius r, and integrating the associated elemental flow over the total immersed surface, the flow rate associated with the immersed flanks can be expressed as
(4)qfl≅8Ων∫Do/2-hDo/2Acos(Do/2-hr)r·dr.The total flow rate expelled by the disk is obtained by adding the results of (3) and (4). Based on this approach, the reduction in boundary-layer thickness could explain why flow rates are reduced for lower viscosities. A comparison between the corresponding calculated values and the results from the test rig is displayed in Figure 9 for the following operating conditions: disk 2 running partly immersed in mineral oil (Toil= 20°C) with a relative immersion depth equal to 0.44 and a tank location defined by L=130 mm and H=10 mm. This figure clearly shows that (3) and (4) do not correctly reproduce the experimentally found variations versus speed. The actual projection mechanisms are certainly more complex than the proposed simplified approach and further studies are needed.Figure 9
Comparison between experimental and numerical results by using boundary-layer theory.


## 5. Dimensional Analysis

In an attempt to propose empirical equations valid over a range of geometry and operating conditions, dimensional analysis is used by assuming that the most influential parameters are:(i)
The geometrical parameters associated with the gear or disk:Do, b, and h.(ii)
The geometrical parameters associated with the tank location:L and H.(iii)
The fluid parameters:ρ, μ and σ.(iv)
The dynamic parameters:Ω and g.The oil flow rateq can therefore be sought as a function of these parameters above, that is:
(5)q=f(Do,b,h,L,H,ρ,μ,σ,Ω,g).As noticed in the previous section, parameters such as the module or tooth number have a negligible influence and can consequently be discarded. The remaining geometrical parametersDo, h, L, and H can be associated to form a single group of parameters defined by
(6)tg(θ)=Do/2-h+HL-(Do/2sin(Acos(1-2h/Do))),
where tg(θ) represents the minimum initial slope of the fluid path (Figure 3) ensuring that the liquid projected by the rotating gear/disk can pass through the oblong-shaped window of the measuring device (Figure 3).Figure10 reveals a 2-slope linear relationship between the measured oil flow rates and tg(θ). These measurements were performed by using gear 4 with a relative immersion depth of 0.33 and different tank locations: L varies from 90 to 130 mm and H from 30 to 60 mm. It is to be noted that similar results have been obtained for other operating conditions.Figure 10
Oil flow rate versus angleθ.From the above remark it is deduced that parametersDo, h, L, and H are not independent, then (5) has to be transformed as follows:
(7)q=f(Do,b,θ,ρ,μ,σ,Ω,g).
Using the results from the boundary layer approach, a dimensionless flow rate is defined by using (3) and (4), that is, the contributions from the flanks and side of a rotating element as:
(8)q¯=qqfl+qside.
The three fundamental parameters Do, Ω, and μ representing length, time, and mass are used to normalize all the other factors and, according to the theorem of Vaschy-Buckingham in dimensional analysis [15], q¯ is found to depend on five groups of parameters as follows:
(9)q¯=ψ1(bDo)ψ2tg(θ)ψ3Reψ4Weψ5Frψ6,
where ψ1···ψ6 are constant coefficients to be adjusted from experimental results.The influence of the Reynolds number Re can be identified from tests with a lubricant at several temperatures (20 and 50°C) while all the other parameters (geometry, rotational speed, etc.) remain constant.ψ4 can therefore be deduced from any pair of experimental results labelled a and b, respectively, under the form:
(10)ψ4=ln(qa¯/qb¯)ln(Rea/Reb).From the experimental evidence, a value of approximately 0.17 has been found for exponentψ4.Tests with the pinion running partly immersed in water have been used in order to quantify the exponent of the Weber number leading to(11)ψ5=ln(qa¯/qb¯(Reb/Rea)0.17)ln(Wea/Web).
The experimental results show that ψ5 is almost equal to 0 or, in other words, that surface tension is not influential and can be discarded in the dimensional analysis.A number of complementary tests were conducted in which (a) only the rotational speed is varied and, (b) only the geometrical characteristics: tg(θ) or face width are changed in order to successively determine the remaining exponents:
(12)ψ6=ln(qa¯/qb¯(Reb/Rea)0.17)ln(Fra/Frb),ψ3=ln(qa¯/qb¯(Reb/Rea)0.17(Frb/Fra)ψ6)ln(tg(θ)a/tg(θ)b).
Additionally, the experimental results show that ψ2 is almost equal to 0. The final relationships are synthesised below:If tg(θ) > 0.88(i)
For500<N<1500 rpm
(13)q¯=0.31tg(θ)-1.5Re0.17Fr-0.6.(ii)
ForN>1500 rpm
(14)q¯=0.09tg(θ)-1.5Re0.17Fr-0.3.If tg(θ) < 0.88(i)
For500<N<1500 rpm
(15)q¯=0.78tg(θ)-1Re0.17Fr-0.6.(ii)
ForN>1500 rpm
(16)q¯=0.17tg(θ)-1Re0.17Fr-0.3.For rotational speeds below 300 rpm, the dimensionless flow rate is equal to zero. In the transition zone (300<N<500 rpm) a linear interpolation between this value and (13) or (15) is employed.A typical series of comparisons between the experimental and the numerical results from (13) to (16) are displayed in Figure 11 where dimensionless flow rates are plotted against rotational speed for gear 1 and different locations of the oil tank. In this figure, the dotted lines represent the numerical results. The results show that the flow rate predictions are satisfactory with a larger discrepancy at the lowest rotational speeds (average error of 11%). More than 250 tests were carried out and the maximum deviation between the numerical and experimental flow rate was found to be equal to 15%. For the sake of illustration, additional curves are given in Figure 12 for different geometries and operating conditions which prove the versatility of the proposed formulae.Figure 11
Comparison between experimental and numerical results [gear 1 −Toil= 20°C − h/Rp = 0.36 − L=130 mm].Figure 12
Comparison between experimental and numerical results [gear 2 −Toil = 50°C − h/Rp = 0.25 − L=130 mm].


## 6. Conclusion

A test rig had been modified in order to quantify the amount of lubricant splashed at various locations on the casing walls by the rotation of a pinion partly immersed in oil. Based on a number of experimental results, a set of analytical formulae has been established using dimensional analysis in relation to an approximate theoretical approach relying on the concept of boundary layer. More than 250 different configurations have been tested and the agreement between the predictions and the experimental evidence is good. It is believed that these results can be useful at the early design stage and help understand splash lubrication characteristics particularly in automotive applications.From a practical viewpoint, it has been demonstrated that a disk and a gear with similar geometry (outer radius and face width) generate equivalent flow rates. This conclusion is important for automotive applications as it underlines that synchronizers can also contribute to gearbox lubrication. The role of the physical properties of the lubricant is emphasized and viscosity appears as highly influential since it has been found that flow rates decrease with the operating viscosity. However, further experiments with different types of lubricants (mineral and synthetic oils) are certainly needed in order to confirm these findings or not. Experiments in this paper were limited to individual disks and spur gears; further investigations are certainly needed concerning the contribution of pinion-gear pairs along with that of helical teeth.



---

*Source: 365414-2012-11-11.xml*