# Antimania-Like Effect ofPanax ginseng Regulating the Glutamatergic Neurotransmission in REM-Sleep Deprivation Rats

Authors: Kang Hyun Leem; Sang A. Kim; Hae Jeong Park
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Previous studies have shown the therapeutic properties of ginseng and ginsenosides on hyperactive and impulsive behaviors in several psychiatric diseases. Herein, we investigated the effect ofPanax ginseng Meyer (PG) on hyperactive/impulsive behaviors in a manic-like animal model, sleep deprivation (SD) rats. Male rats were sleep-deprived for 48 h, and PG (200 mg/kg) was administered for 4 days, from 2 days prior to the start of SD to the end date of SD. The elevated plus maze (EPM) test showed that PG alleviated the increased frequency of entries into and spent time within open arms by SD. In order to investigate the molecular mechanism on this effect of PG, we assessed differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the prefrontal cortex of PG-treated SD rats using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and performed gene-enrichment analysis for DEGs. The gene-enrichment analysis showed that PG most prominently affected the glutamatergic synapse pathway. Among the glutamatergic synapse pathway genes, particularly, PG enhanced the expressions of glutamate transporter Slc1a3 and Slc1a2 reduced in SD rats. Moreover, we found that PG could inhibit the SD-induced phosphorylation of the NR2A subunit of the NMDA receptor. These results suggested that PG might have a therapeutic effect against the manic-like behaviors, regulating the glutamatergic neurotransmission.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Sleep disturbance is the most frequent symptom in manic episodes and a relapse factor of manic episodes in bipolar disorder (BPD) [1, 2]. In rodents, sleep deprivation (SD) has been considered as an environmental mania model [3, 4]. Indeed, in rats and mice, SD rodents have shown manic-like behaviors, including locomotor hyperactivity, hypersexuality, irritability, and aggressiveness, as observed during the manic phase in patients with BPD [3, 4]. In addition, treatments of mood stabilizers such as lithium and valproic acid, which are have been used for relieving in the manic episodes in BPD, reduced these manic-like behaviors in SD animals [5–7]. Neurochemical alterations in SD animals were also represented, similar to patients during the manic phase in BPD. In the brains of SD animals, the dopaminergic hyperactivity, the increased activity of protein kinase C, and the decreased levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were observed [5, 8–10].Ginseng is a popular herbal medicine widely used for multiple pharmacological functions such as anticancer, antioxidant, antistress, and antiaging effects [11]. Previous studies have also reported that ginseng has antidepressant and antipsychotic effects. Ginseng extract and its ingredient ginsenosides increased the level of BDNF and its signaling pathway molecules and activated the neurogenesis in the hippocampus of depressive animals exposed to chronic mild stress [12, 13]. In addition, ginseng decreased the schizophrenic symptoms in prenatally stressed neurodevelopmental and ketamine-treated schizophrenic rodents, regulating the neurodevelopmental genes and the levels of dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine [14, 15].Based on various pharmacological properties of ginseng including beneficial effects on psychiatric diseases, in this study, we examined the effect ofPanax ginseng Meyer (PG) extract on manic-like behavior in SD rats. In addition, in order to identify the molecular mechanism on the effect of PG on manic behaviors, we assessed differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by PG treatment in the prefrontal cortex of SD rats using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Among the DEGs, we particularly paid attention to the genes belonging to the glutamatergic synapse pathway, which showed the lowest p value in the gene-enrichment analysis on DEGs based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. We also focused on amphetamine addiction pathway genes because the amphetamine treatment in rodents has been widely used as a pharmacological mania model. The effect of PG on mania and BPD was further studied and discussed, focusing on the genes belonging to the glutamatergic synapse and amphetamine addiction pathways.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Preparation of PG

PG was purchased from Cheongsongyinsamsa (Kumsan, Chungnam, Korea) and was ground to powder. It (300 g) was extracted twice with 3 L of 70% ethyl alcohol for 1 day in a room temperature, filtered through filter paper (Advantec, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan), concentrated by rotary evaporator (N-1200BS, Eyela, Tokyo, Japan), and then freeze-dried (Freezone 6, Labconco, Kansas, MO, USA). The yield of freeze-dried PG was calculated to be 16.7%.


### 2.2. Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (150-200 g; Central Lab. Animal Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) were maintained under a 12-h light/dark cycle (light on at 7:00 AM and off at 7:00 PM) at a standard temperature (25±2°C) with food and water freely available. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the animal care guidelines of the National Institute for Health (NIH) Guide and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Semyum University (smecae17-07-02).


### 2.3. SD and PG Treatment

For REM-SD, the modified multiple platform method was used [10, 16]. We randomly divided rats into control (non-SD), SD, and PG-treated SD groups. The rats of the SD and PG-treated SD groups were put in a chamber with six small platforms (6 cm diameter) surrounded by water (n=4 per chamber). When the rats enter REM sleep, the rats were awakened when they touch the water by diminished muscle tone. The rats of the control group were put in a chamber with six large platforms (15 cm diameter) (n=4 per chamber). On large platforms, the rats could sleep on. But those are also surrounded by water and not enough for rats to walk around on. The water was filled up to about 2 cm below the surfaces of the platforms, and the rats could move across platforms within the chamber with large or small platforms. Food and water were available ad libitum. All rats remained in the chambers for 48 h.PG has been used as a treatment in CNS disease rats such as psychiatric and neurological diseases at doses of 100-200 mg/kg [17–19]. Based on these previous reports, we treated PG (200 mg/kg, in a concentration of 40 mg/ml in distilled water, p.o.) to rats of the PG-treated SD group, 5 times for a total period of 4 days, from 2 days prior to the start of SD (9:00 AM) to the end of SD at 9:00 AM. To the rats of the control and SD groups, distilled water was taken in the same manner. After 48 h, the rats of all groups were sacrificed. The prefrontal cortex from each rat was dissected out, weighed, and kept frozen until analysis.


### 2.4. Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) Test

After SD for 48 h, the EPM test was carried out in the manner of the previous study [20]. The EPM test apparatus was consisted of two open arms (30×10cm) and two enclosed arms (30×10×30cm, with an open roof) of black wood and raised to a height of 50 cm. After habituation in the testing room for 20 min, the rats were put in the center of a cross-maze facing the open arms. For 5 min (test session), we checked the time spent and the numbers of entries into the open or closed arms.


### 2.5. RNA Isolation and RNA-Seq

The next-generation sequencing was performed using the RNA pooled from 3 rats per group. The total RNA was isolated from the prefrontal cortex samples pooled in each group using TRIzol. RNA integrity was measured using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).The cDNA libraries were constructed using the TruSeq RNA Library kit on 1μg of total RNA according to the following process: extraction of polyA-selected RNA, fragmentation of RNA, reverse transcription using random hexamer, and 100 nt paired-end sequencing using Illumina HiSeq4000. We quantified the libraries through qPCR using an Agilent Technologies 2100 Bioanalyzer.The low quality and adapter sequences were excluded from the raw reads of the sequencer. And then, the reads were aligned to theRattus norvegicus (UCSC Baylor 3.4/rn4) using HISAT v2.0.5 [21]. The reference genome sequence of Rattus norvegicus and annotation data were acquired from the NCBI. The aligned reads were assembled into the transcripts, and their abundance was estimated using StringTie v1.3.3d [22, 23]. The relative abundance was estimated as fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped reads (FPKM) of transcript and gene expressed in each group. The RNAseq data has been uploaded to the public repository Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; submission ID: SUB8063770).


### 2.6. Statistical Analysis of Gene Expression Level

In order to select differentially expressed genes, the relative abundances for each gene were compared between groups. Genes whose FRKM was 0 in any of the groups were excluded from the analysis. After 1 was added to the FPKM values of genes, the values were converted based on log2 and then were subjected to quantile normalization. We determined the differential expression data by ∣foldchangeFC∣≥2 and independent t-test. In order to measure the similarity, hierarchical clustering for the DEG set was conducted using complete linkage and Euclidean distance. The gene-enrichment analysis for DEGs was also conducted based on the KEGG pathway (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/) database. Enrichment p values on KEGG pathway terms were calculated based on a modified Fisher’s exact test. And then, the false discovery rate (FDR-) adjusted p values using the Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm were calculated. All data analysis on RNA-seq was conducted using R 3.4.3 (http://www.r-project.org/).


### 2.7. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using a 1st strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (BioAssay Co., Daejeon, Republic of Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qRT-PCR was conducted using Real-Time PCR EvaGreen Kit (SolGent, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) and specific primers on each gene (TableS3). The analyses were performed using a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). The relative quantification of mRNA transcripts was calculated based on the 2−ΔΔCT method [24]. The expressions of UBC as a housekeeping gene were used for the analysis of relative expression levels of other genes [25].


### 2.8. Immunoblot

The prefrontal cortex dissected from each rat was homogenized in RIPA buffer with 1× protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA). For assessing the protein concentration, the Bradford reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used. After separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS-) polyacrylamide gels, proteins of 50μg were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). The membranes were incubated with mouse solute carrier family 1 (glial high-affinity glutamate transporter), member 2 (Slc1a2; also known as Eaat2) (Merck Millipore Darmstadt, Germany), rabbit Slc1a3 (also known as Eaat1), rabbit activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc), rabbit N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit 2A (NR2A), rabbit phospho-NR2A, rabbit NR2B (Y1325, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and rabbit phospho-NR2B (Y1472; Cell Signaling Technology). Then, the membranes were further incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antimouse or antirabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). ECL substrate (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) was used for the visualization of protein bands. The band intensity was quantified using the ImageJ image analysis software (version 1.4; NIH).


### 2.9. Statistical Analysis

The results are expressed asmean±standarderror of the mean (SE). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by the LSD post hoc test, using the IBM SPSS Statistics 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Values of p<0.05 were considered as statistically significant.


## 2.1. Preparation of PG

PG was purchased from Cheongsongyinsamsa (Kumsan, Chungnam, Korea) and was ground to powder. It (300 g) was extracted twice with 3 L of 70% ethyl alcohol for 1 day in a room temperature, filtered through filter paper (Advantec, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan), concentrated by rotary evaporator (N-1200BS, Eyela, Tokyo, Japan), and then freeze-dried (Freezone 6, Labconco, Kansas, MO, USA). The yield of freeze-dried PG was calculated to be 16.7%.


## 2.2. Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (150-200 g; Central Lab. Animal Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) were maintained under a 12-h light/dark cycle (light on at 7:00 AM and off at 7:00 PM) at a standard temperature (25±2°C) with food and water freely available. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the animal care guidelines of the National Institute for Health (NIH) Guide and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Semyum University (smecae17-07-02).


## 2.3. SD and PG Treatment

For REM-SD, the modified multiple platform method was used [10, 16]. We randomly divided rats into control (non-SD), SD, and PG-treated SD groups. The rats of the SD and PG-treated SD groups were put in a chamber with six small platforms (6 cm diameter) surrounded by water (n=4 per chamber). When the rats enter REM sleep, the rats were awakened when they touch the water by diminished muscle tone. The rats of the control group were put in a chamber with six large platforms (15 cm diameter) (n=4 per chamber). On large platforms, the rats could sleep on. But those are also surrounded by water and not enough for rats to walk around on. The water was filled up to about 2 cm below the surfaces of the platforms, and the rats could move across platforms within the chamber with large or small platforms. Food and water were available ad libitum. All rats remained in the chambers for 48 h.PG has been used as a treatment in CNS disease rats such as psychiatric and neurological diseases at doses of 100-200 mg/kg [17–19]. Based on these previous reports, we treated PG (200 mg/kg, in a concentration of 40 mg/ml in distilled water, p.o.) to rats of the PG-treated SD group, 5 times for a total period of 4 days, from 2 days prior to the start of SD (9:00 AM) to the end of SD at 9:00 AM. To the rats of the control and SD groups, distilled water was taken in the same manner. After 48 h, the rats of all groups were sacrificed. The prefrontal cortex from each rat was dissected out, weighed, and kept frozen until analysis.


## 2.4. Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) Test

After SD for 48 h, the EPM test was carried out in the manner of the previous study [20]. The EPM test apparatus was consisted of two open arms (30×10cm) and two enclosed arms (30×10×30cm, with an open roof) of black wood and raised to a height of 50 cm. After habituation in the testing room for 20 min, the rats were put in the center of a cross-maze facing the open arms. For 5 min (test session), we checked the time spent and the numbers of entries into the open or closed arms.


## 2.5. RNA Isolation and RNA-Seq

The next-generation sequencing was performed using the RNA pooled from 3 rats per group. The total RNA was isolated from the prefrontal cortex samples pooled in each group using TRIzol. RNA integrity was measured using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).The cDNA libraries were constructed using the TruSeq RNA Library kit on 1μg of total RNA according to the following process: extraction of polyA-selected RNA, fragmentation of RNA, reverse transcription using random hexamer, and 100 nt paired-end sequencing using Illumina HiSeq4000. We quantified the libraries through qPCR using an Agilent Technologies 2100 Bioanalyzer.The low quality and adapter sequences were excluded from the raw reads of the sequencer. And then, the reads were aligned to theRattus norvegicus (UCSC Baylor 3.4/rn4) using HISAT v2.0.5 [21]. The reference genome sequence of Rattus norvegicus and annotation data were acquired from the NCBI. The aligned reads were assembled into the transcripts, and their abundance was estimated using StringTie v1.3.3d [22, 23]. The relative abundance was estimated as fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped reads (FPKM) of transcript and gene expressed in each group. The RNAseq data has been uploaded to the public repository Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; submission ID: SUB8063770).


## 2.6. Statistical Analysis of Gene Expression Level

In order to select differentially expressed genes, the relative abundances for each gene were compared between groups. Genes whose FRKM was 0 in any of the groups were excluded from the analysis. After 1 was added to the FPKM values of genes, the values were converted based on log2 and then were subjected to quantile normalization. We determined the differential expression data by ∣foldchangeFC∣≥2 and independent t-test. In order to measure the similarity, hierarchical clustering for the DEG set was conducted using complete linkage and Euclidean distance. The gene-enrichment analysis for DEGs was also conducted based on the KEGG pathway (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/) database. Enrichment p values on KEGG pathway terms were calculated based on a modified Fisher’s exact test. And then, the false discovery rate (FDR-) adjusted p values using the Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm were calculated. All data analysis on RNA-seq was conducted using R 3.4.3 (http://www.r-project.org/).


## 2.7. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using a 1st strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (BioAssay Co., Daejeon, Republic of Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qRT-PCR was conducted using Real-Time PCR EvaGreen Kit (SolGent, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) and specific primers on each gene (TableS3). The analyses were performed using a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). The relative quantification of mRNA transcripts was calculated based on the 2−ΔΔCT method [24]. The expressions of UBC as a housekeeping gene were used for the analysis of relative expression levels of other genes [25].


## 2.8. Immunoblot

The prefrontal cortex dissected from each rat was homogenized in RIPA buffer with 1× protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA). For assessing the protein concentration, the Bradford reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used. After separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS-) polyacrylamide gels, proteins of 50μg were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). The membranes were incubated with mouse solute carrier family 1 (glial high-affinity glutamate transporter), member 2 (Slc1a2; also known as Eaat2) (Merck Millipore Darmstadt, Germany), rabbit Slc1a3 (also known as Eaat1), rabbit activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc), rabbit N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit 2A (NR2A), rabbit phospho-NR2A, rabbit NR2B (Y1325, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and rabbit phospho-NR2B (Y1472; Cell Signaling Technology). Then, the membranes were further incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antimouse or antirabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). ECL substrate (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) was used for the visualization of protein bands. The band intensity was quantified using the ImageJ image analysis software (version 1.4; NIH).


## 2.9. Statistical Analysis

The results are expressed asmean±standarderror of the mean (SE). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by the LSD post hoc test, using the IBM SPSS Statistics 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Values of p<0.05 were considered as statistically significant.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Effect of PG on Manic-Like Behavior of SD Rats

The effect of PG on the hyperactive- and impulsive-like behaviors was assessed in SD rats using the EPM test. In the EPM test, the increased frequencies of open arm entries and the spent time in open arms have been considered as a sign of impulsive-like behavior [26, 27]. As shown in Figure 1, the SD rats entered the open arms more frequently and spent more time in the open arms than the control rats. In comparison, the PG-treated SD rats showed the decreased frequency of entries into and spent time within the open arms compared to the SD rats (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). This result indicated that the PG treatment alleviated the increased impulsivity in SD rats. In addition, the PG treatment reduced the hyperlocomotion shown in SD rats. The frequency of the total entries to the open and close was increased in SD rats compared to control rats, whereas PG-treated SD rats revealed a lower frequency of total entries than SD rats (Figure 1(c)).Figure 1
Effects ofPanax ginseng (PG) on manic-like behaviors in sleep deprivation (SD) rats. Manic-like behaviors in sleep deprivation rats were measured using the elevated plus-maze (EPM) test. Impulsive behavior was indicated by (a) the percentage of open arm entries and (b) percentage of time spent in the open arms. (c) Hyperactive locomotion was indicated by the number of total entries into the open and closed arms. The results are presented as the mean±SE of two independent experiments (n=4 for each group per each experiment). ∗p<0.05 compared to the control group; †p<0.05 compared to the SD group. PG, PG.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.2. Altered Gene Expression by PG in the Prefrontal Cortex of SD Rats

In order to identify the alteration of gene expressions by PG treatment in SD rats, we performed RNA-seq in the prefrontal cortex of the control, SD, and PG-treated SD rats. Through RNA-seq, we acquired the expression data on 13,254 genes. In the DEG analysis on RNA-seq result, we selected genes showing∣FC∣ of 2.0 or greater and the a p value of 0.05 or less in comparisons among groups. A total of 66 DEGs were identified in the control vs. SD comparison (Table S1). The expressions of 31 genes were upregulated in the SD rats compared to control rats, and the expressions of 35 genes were downregulated. In the SD vs. PG-treated SD comparison, 94 DEGs were identified (Table S2). PG treatment increased the expressions of 56 genes and decreased the expressions of 38 genes in SD rats. In order to determine the effect of PG on SD, we focused on 94 DEGs identified in the SD vs. PG-treated SD comparison and carried out a gene-enrichment analysis on 94 DEGs. Through the enrichment analysis based on the KEGG pathway database, 26 significant pathways were detected (FDR-corrected p<0.05; Table 1). Among the pathways, the glutamatergic synapse pathway showed the most significant enrichment. The glutamatergic synapse pathway genes altered by PG treatment in SD rats included Slc1a2, Slc1a3, adenylate cyclase 1 (Adcy1), glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 3 (Grik3), glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 3A (Grin3a), and G protein subunit gamma 2 (Gng2). In PG-treated SD rats, the expressions of all of these genes were elevated, compared to SD rats (Table 2). We also paid attention to the amphetamine addiction pathway (Table 1), because the amphetamine treatment in rodents has been widely used as a pharmacological mania model. Among the genes belonging to the amphetamine addiction pathway, the expressions of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha (Camk2a) and Grin3a were increased in PG-treated rats compared to SD rats, whereas the expression of Arc was decreased (Table 2). Among the genes belonging to the glutamatergic synapse or amphetamine addiction pathways, Slc1a3, Gng2, and Arc were also identified as DEGs in the control vs. SD comparison. In the SD rats, the expression of Slc1a3 and Gng2 was downregulated, and the expression of Arc was upregulated, compared to control rats (Table 2).Table 1
Gene-enrichment analysis on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) byPanax ginseng (PG) in sleep deprivation (SD) rats.
KEGG MapIDMap nameNo. of genesGenesp valueFDRp value04724Glutamatergic synapse6Grin3a, Slc1a2, Slc1a3, Grik3, Adcy1, Gng2< 0.00010.000104371Apelin signaling pathway6Nos1, Spp1, Prkce, Adcy1, Klf2, Gng2< 0.00010.000205418Fluid shear stress and atherosclerosis5Dusp1, Mgst1, Bmp4, Klf2, Bmpr1b0.00010.002704062Chemokine signaling pathway5Shc3, Ccl4, Adcy1, Gng2, Gsk3b0.00010.003704024cAMP signaling pathway5Grin3a, Pde4d, Camk2a, Atp2b4, Adcy10.00010.004305032Morphine addiction4Pde4d, Gabrb2, Adcy1, Gng20.00030.007204713Circadian entrainment4Nos1, Camk2a, Adcy1, Gng20.00030.007304919Thyroid hormone signaling pathway4Thrb, Bmp4, Pdpk1, Gsk3b0.00060.010504722Neurotrophin signaling pathway4Shc3, Camk2a, Pdpk1, Gsk3b0.00070.011004550Signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells4Bmp4, Inhba, Bmpr1b, Gsk3b0.00090.013504261Adrenergic signaling in cardiomyocytes4Cacng4, Camk2a, Atp2b4, Adcy10.00100.013504921Oxytocin signaling pathway4Cacng4, Camk2a, Adcy1, Myl60.00120.014604390Hippo signaling pathway4Bmp4, Bmpr1b, Dlg2, Gsk3b0.00120.014604360Axon guidance4Camk2a, Bmpr1b, Robo3, Gsk3b0.00180.019205200Pathways in cancer5Bmp4, Adcy1, Zbtb16, Gng2, Gsk3b0.00190.019604020Calcium signaling pathway4Nos1, Camk2a, Atp2b4, Adcy10.00210.019904510Focal adhesion4Shc3, Spp1, Pdpk1, Gsk3b0.00260.022805031Amphetamine addiction3Grin3a, Camk2a, Arc0.00370.030904970Salivary secretion3Nos1, Atp2b4, Adcy10.00510.040205206MicroRNAs in cancer4Mir27b, Mir128-1, Mir26a, Prkce0.00570.041904925Aldosterone synthesis and secretion3Camk2a, Prkce, Adcy10.00580.041904350TGF-beta signaling pathway3Bmp4, Inhba, Bmpr1b0.00620.042204012ErbB signaling pathway3Shc3, Camk2a, Gsk3b0.00650.042204727GABAergic synapse3Gabrb2, Adcy1, Gng20.00680.042204080Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction4Grin3a, Thrb, Gabrb2, Grik30.00700.042204916Melanogenesis3Camk2a, Adcy1, Gsk3b0.00810.0470Gene-enrichment analysis for DEGs was performed based on the KEGG pathway database (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/). The p values were calculated based on a modified Fisher’s exact test. The false discovery rate (FDR) was controlled by adjusting the p value using the Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm.Table 2
Different expressions of glutamatergic synapse and amphetamine addiction pathway genes in the control, sleep deprivation (SD), andPanax ginseng (PG-) treated SD rats.
GeneDescriptionFCSD+PG/SSD/controlGlutamatergic synapseSlc1a3Solute carrier family 1 member 35.132-3.718Slc1a2Solute carrier family 1 (glial high-affinity glutamate transporter), member 22.181-1.18Adcy1Adenylate cyclase 1 (brain)3.268-1.125Grik3Glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 32.0321.517Grin3aGlutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 3A2.012-1.283Gng2G protein subunit gamma 262.921-53.461Amphetamine addictionCamk2aCalcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha2.111-1.135ArcActivity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein-2.0963.674Grin3aGlutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 3A2.012-1.283FC: fold-change.


### 3.3. Effect of PG on the Expressions of the Glutamatergic Synapse and Amphetamine Addiction Pathway Genes in SD Rats

To validate the RNA-seq result, we examined the expressions of 8 genes belonging to the glutamatergic synapse and amphetamine addiction pathways in the prefrontal cortex of the control, SD, and PG-treated SD rats using qRT-PCR. As shown in Figure2, the mRNA expressions of Slc1a3 and Slc1a2 were decreased in SD rats compared to the control rats, and the PG treatment alleviated the decreases. In contrast, SD elevated the expression of Arc, and the PG treatment inhibited the elevation of Arc in SD rats. The expression level of Camk2a was higher in the PG-treated SD rats than in SD rats, but the difference of the expressions between the control and SD rats was not observed. Although our RNA-seq result showed that the expressions of Adcy1, Grik3, Grin3a, and Gng2 were upregulated in PG-treated SD rats compared to SD rats, the significant difference of their expressions was not detected in the qRT-PCR analysis.Figure 2
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) validation of the glutamatergic synapse and amphetamine addiction pathway genes. Expressions of the glutamatergic synapse and amphetamine addiction pathway genes were determined using the qRT-PCR in the prefrontal cortex of the control, sleep deprivation (SD), andPanax ginseng (PG)-treated SD rats. The histogram reveals the expression levels of genes as mean±SE. Expression levels were normalized against ubiquitin C (Ubc). The experiments were repeated in duplicates (n=4 for each group per experiment). ∗p<0.05 compared to the control group; †p<0.05 compared to the SD group.


### 3.4. Effect of PG on the Protein Expressions of Slc1a2, Slc1a3, and Arc in SD Rats

We also examined the protein expressions of Slc1a2, Slc1a3, and Arc in the prefrontal cortex of the control, SD, and PG-treated SD rats (Figures3(a) and 3(b)). The protein expressions of Slc1a2 and Slc1a3 were reduced in SD rats, whereas the PG treatment restored the reduction in SD rats. In contrast, SD enhanced the protein expression of Arc, whereas the PG treatment in SD rats suppressed the enhanced expression of Arc.Figure 3
Effect ofPanax ginseng (PG) on the expression of Slc1a2, Slc1A3, and Arc and the phosphorylation of the NMDA receptor in sleep deprivation (SD) rats. (a) The expressions of Slc1a2, Slc1A3, and Arc and (b) the phosphorylations of the NR2 subunits of the NMDA receptor were determined using immunoblotting in the prefrontal cortex of the control, SD, and PG-treated SD rats. The left and middle histograms represent the protein expression and the phosphorylation levels divided by the expression level of β-actin as mean±SE. The right histogram shows the ratio of the phosphorylation levels to the protein expression levels. β-Actin expression was used as an internal control. The experiments were repeated in duplicates (n=3 for each group per experiment). ∗p<0.05 compared to the control group; †p<0.05 compared to the SD group.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


### 3.5. Effect of PG on the Activation of NMDA Receptors in SD Rats

In order to determine the effect of PG on the activation of NMDA receptor, which is a key receptor in neurotransmission through the glutamatergic synapse and amphetamine addiction pathways, we assessed the expression and phosphorylation levels of NR2A and NR2B subunits of the NMDA receptor in the prefrontal cortex of the control, SD, and PG-treated SD rats. As shown in Figures3(c) and 3(d), SD and PG treatment did not affect the protein expression of NR2A. However, SD could elevate the phosphorylation of NR2A, whereas PG inhibited the SD-induced phosphorylation of NR2A. In addition, SD increased the protein expression of NR2B. However, the PG treatment did not suppress the expression of NR2B. Neither SD nor PG treatment affects the phosphorylation of NR2B. These results indicate that the PG treatment could inhibit the SD-induced activation of the NR2A subunit of the NMDA receptor in the prefrontal cortex, but not the NR2B subunit.


## 3.1. Effect of PG on Manic-Like Behavior of SD Rats

The effect of PG on the hyperactive- and impulsive-like behaviors was assessed in SD rats using the EPM test. In the EPM test, the increased frequencies of open arm entries and the spent time in open arms have been considered as a sign of impulsive-like behavior [26, 27]. As shown in Figure 1, the SD rats entered the open arms more frequently and spent more time in the open arms than the control rats. In comparison, the PG-treated SD rats showed the decreased frequency of entries into and spent time within the open arms compared to the SD rats (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). This result indicated that the PG treatment alleviated the increased impulsivity in SD rats. In addition, the PG treatment reduced the hyperlocomotion shown in SD rats. The frequency of the total entries to the open and close was increased in SD rats compared to control rats, whereas PG-treated SD rats revealed a lower frequency of total entries than SD rats (Figure 1(c)).Figure 1
Effects ofPanax ginseng (PG) on manic-like behaviors in sleep deprivation (SD) rats. Manic-like behaviors in sleep deprivation rats were measured using the elevated plus-maze (EPM) test. Impulsive behavior was indicated by (a) the percentage of open arm entries and (b) percentage of time spent in the open arms. (c) Hyperactive locomotion was indicated by the number of total entries into the open and closed arms. The results are presented as the mean±SE of two independent experiments (n=4 for each group per each experiment). ∗p<0.05 compared to the control group; †p<0.05 compared to the SD group. PG, PG.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.2. Altered Gene Expression by PG in the Prefrontal Cortex of SD Rats

In order to identify the alteration of gene expressions by PG treatment in SD rats, we performed RNA-seq in the prefrontal cortex of the control, SD, and PG-treated SD rats. Through RNA-seq, we acquired the expression data on 13,254 genes. In the DEG analysis on RNA-seq result, we selected genes showing∣FC∣ of 2.0 or greater and the a p value of 0.05 or less in comparisons among groups. A total of 66 DEGs were identified in the control vs. SD comparison (Table S1). The expressions of 31 genes were upregulated in the SD rats compared to control rats, and the expressions of 35 genes were downregulated. In the SD vs. PG-treated SD comparison, 94 DEGs were identified (Table S2). PG treatment increased the expressions of 56 genes and decreased the expressions of 38 genes in SD rats. In order to determine the effect of PG on SD, we focused on 94 DEGs identified in the SD vs. PG-treated SD comparison and carried out a gene-enrichment analysis on 94 DEGs. Through the enrichment analysis based on the KEGG pathway database, 26 significant pathways were detected (FDR-corrected p<0.05; Table 1). Among the pathways, the glutamatergic synapse pathway showed the most significant enrichment. The glutamatergic synapse pathway genes altered by PG treatment in SD rats included Slc1a2, Slc1a3, adenylate cyclase 1 (Adcy1), glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 3 (Grik3), glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 3A (Grin3a), and G protein subunit gamma 2 (Gng2). In PG-treated SD rats, the expressions of all of these genes were elevated, compared to SD rats (Table 2). We also paid attention to the amphetamine addiction pathway (Table 1), because the amphetamine treatment in rodents has been widely used as a pharmacological mania model. Among the genes belonging to the amphetamine addiction pathway, the expressions of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha (Camk2a) and Grin3a were increased in PG-treated rats compared to SD rats, whereas the expression of Arc was decreased (Table 2). Among the genes belonging to the glutamatergic synapse or amphetamine addiction pathways, Slc1a3, Gng2, and Arc were also identified as DEGs in the control vs. SD comparison. In the SD rats, the expression of Slc1a3 and Gng2 was downregulated, and the expression of Arc was upregulated, compared to control rats (Table 2).Table 1
Gene-enrichment analysis on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) byPanax ginseng (PG) in sleep deprivation (SD) rats.
KEGG MapIDMap nameNo. of genesGenesp valueFDRp value04724Glutamatergic synapse6Grin3a, Slc1a2, Slc1a3, Grik3, Adcy1, Gng2< 0.00010.000104371Apelin signaling pathway6Nos1, Spp1, Prkce, Adcy1, Klf2, Gng2< 0.00010.000205418Fluid shear stress and atherosclerosis5Dusp1, Mgst1, Bmp4, Klf2, Bmpr1b0.00010.002704062Chemokine signaling pathway5Shc3, Ccl4, Adcy1, Gng2, Gsk3b0.00010.003704024cAMP signaling pathway5Grin3a, Pde4d, Camk2a, Atp2b4, Adcy10.00010.004305032Morphine addiction4Pde4d, Gabrb2, Adcy1, Gng20.00030.007204713Circadian entrainment4Nos1, Camk2a, Adcy1, Gng20.00030.007304919Thyroid hormone signaling pathway4Thrb, Bmp4, Pdpk1, Gsk3b0.00060.010504722Neurotrophin signaling pathway4Shc3, Camk2a, Pdpk1, Gsk3b0.00070.011004550Signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells4Bmp4, Inhba, Bmpr1b, Gsk3b0.00090.013504261Adrenergic signaling in cardiomyocytes4Cacng4, Camk2a, Atp2b4, Adcy10.00100.013504921Oxytocin signaling pathway4Cacng4, Camk2a, Adcy1, Myl60.00120.014604390Hippo signaling pathway4Bmp4, Bmpr1b, Dlg2, Gsk3b0.00120.014604360Axon guidance4Camk2a, Bmpr1b, Robo3, Gsk3b0.00180.019205200Pathways in cancer5Bmp4, Adcy1, Zbtb16, Gng2, Gsk3b0.00190.019604020Calcium signaling pathway4Nos1, Camk2a, Atp2b4, Adcy10.00210.019904510Focal adhesion4Shc3, Spp1, Pdpk1, Gsk3b0.00260.022805031Amphetamine addiction3Grin3a, Camk2a, Arc0.00370.030904970Salivary secretion3Nos1, Atp2b4, Adcy10.00510.040205206MicroRNAs in cancer4Mir27b, Mir128-1, Mir26a, Prkce0.00570.041904925Aldosterone synthesis and secretion3Camk2a, Prkce, Adcy10.00580.041904350TGF-beta signaling pathway3Bmp4, Inhba, Bmpr1b0.00620.042204012ErbB signaling pathway3Shc3, Camk2a, Gsk3b0.00650.042204727GABAergic synapse3Gabrb2, Adcy1, Gng20.00680.042204080Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction4Grin3a, Thrb, Gabrb2, Grik30.00700.042204916Melanogenesis3Camk2a, Adcy1, Gsk3b0.00810.0470Gene-enrichment analysis for DEGs was performed based on the KEGG pathway database (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/). The p values were calculated based on a modified Fisher’s exact test. The false discovery rate (FDR) was controlled by adjusting the p value using the Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm.Table 2
Different expressions of glutamatergic synapse and amphetamine addiction pathway genes in the control, sleep deprivation (SD), andPanax ginseng (PG-) treated SD rats.
GeneDescriptionFCSD+PG/SSD/controlGlutamatergic synapseSlc1a3Solute carrier family 1 member 35.132-3.718Slc1a2Solute carrier family 1 (glial high-affinity glutamate transporter), member 22.181-1.18Adcy1Adenylate cyclase 1 (brain)3.268-1.125Grik3Glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 32.0321.517Grin3aGlutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 3A2.012-1.283Gng2G protein subunit gamma 262.921-53.461Amphetamine addictionCamk2aCalcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha2.111-1.135ArcActivity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein-2.0963.674Grin3aGlutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 3A2.012-1.283FC: fold-change.


## 3.3. Effect of PG on the Expressions of the Glutamatergic Synapse and Amphetamine Addiction Pathway Genes in SD Rats

To validate the RNA-seq result, we examined the expressions of 8 genes belonging to the glutamatergic synapse and amphetamine addiction pathways in the prefrontal cortex of the control, SD, and PG-treated SD rats using qRT-PCR. As shown in Figure2, the mRNA expressions of Slc1a3 and Slc1a2 were decreased in SD rats compared to the control rats, and the PG treatment alleviated the decreases. In contrast, SD elevated the expression of Arc, and the PG treatment inhibited the elevation of Arc in SD rats. The expression level of Camk2a was higher in the PG-treated SD rats than in SD rats, but the difference of the expressions between the control and SD rats was not observed. Although our RNA-seq result showed that the expressions of Adcy1, Grik3, Grin3a, and Gng2 were upregulated in PG-treated SD rats compared to SD rats, the significant difference of their expressions was not detected in the qRT-PCR analysis.Figure 2
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) validation of the glutamatergic synapse and amphetamine addiction pathway genes. Expressions of the glutamatergic synapse and amphetamine addiction pathway genes were determined using the qRT-PCR in the prefrontal cortex of the control, sleep deprivation (SD), andPanax ginseng (PG)-treated SD rats. The histogram reveals the expression levels of genes as mean±SE. Expression levels were normalized against ubiquitin C (Ubc). The experiments were repeated in duplicates (n=4 for each group per experiment). ∗p<0.05 compared to the control group; †p<0.05 compared to the SD group.


## 3.4. Effect of PG on the Protein Expressions of Slc1a2, Slc1a3, and Arc in SD Rats

We also examined the protein expressions of Slc1a2, Slc1a3, and Arc in the prefrontal cortex of the control, SD, and PG-treated SD rats (Figures3(a) and 3(b)). The protein expressions of Slc1a2 and Slc1a3 were reduced in SD rats, whereas the PG treatment restored the reduction in SD rats. In contrast, SD enhanced the protein expression of Arc, whereas the PG treatment in SD rats suppressed the enhanced expression of Arc.Figure 3
Effect ofPanax ginseng (PG) on the expression of Slc1a2, Slc1A3, and Arc and the phosphorylation of the NMDA receptor in sleep deprivation (SD) rats. (a) The expressions of Slc1a2, Slc1A3, and Arc and (b) the phosphorylations of the NR2 subunits of the NMDA receptor were determined using immunoblotting in the prefrontal cortex of the control, SD, and PG-treated SD rats. The left and middle histograms represent the protein expression and the phosphorylation levels divided by the expression level of β-actin as mean±SE. The right histogram shows the ratio of the phosphorylation levels to the protein expression levels. β-Actin expression was used as an internal control. The experiments were repeated in duplicates (n=3 for each group per experiment). ∗p<0.05 compared to the control group; †p<0.05 compared to the SD group.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.5. Effect of PG on the Activation of NMDA Receptors in SD Rats

In order to determine the effect of PG on the activation of NMDA receptor, which is a key receptor in neurotransmission through the glutamatergic synapse and amphetamine addiction pathways, we assessed the expression and phosphorylation levels of NR2A and NR2B subunits of the NMDA receptor in the prefrontal cortex of the control, SD, and PG-treated SD rats. As shown in Figures3(c) and 3(d), SD and PG treatment did not affect the protein expression of NR2A. However, SD could elevate the phosphorylation of NR2A, whereas PG inhibited the SD-induced phosphorylation of NR2A. In addition, SD increased the protein expression of NR2B. However, the PG treatment did not suppress the expression of NR2B. Neither SD nor PG treatment affects the phosphorylation of NR2B. These results indicate that the PG treatment could inhibit the SD-induced activation of the NR2A subunit of the NMDA receptor in the prefrontal cortex, but not the NR2B subunit.


## 4. Discussion

In this study, we found that PG could attenuate the manic-like behaviors shown in SD rats. In order to identify the mechanism of the effect of PG in SD rats, we assessed the alteration of molecules by PG treatment in the prefrontal cortex of SD rats. PG prominently altered the expressions of the glutamatergic synapse and amphetamine addiction pathway genes in SD rats. In particular, PG alleviated the decreased expressions of Slc1a2 and Slc1a3 and the increased expression of Arc shown in SD rats. These alleviations by PG in SD rats were also observed in the protein levels. Moreover, PG could inhibit the SD-induced phosphorylation of the NR2A subunit of the NMDA receptor.BPD patients in a manic state represent the characteristic behaviors such as hyperactivity, impulsivity, and aggressiveness [28, 29]. Rodent models of mania have also shown the hyperactive- and the impulsive-like behaviors, increasing the total number of entries into the arms and the frequencies of the open arm entries/the spent time in the open arms in the EPM test [30–32]. Also, in our SD rats, the hyperactive and impulsive mania-like behaviors were observed through the EPM test, similar to the mania rodent models of previous studies. Interestingly, PG treatment significantly reduced these mania-like behaviors. A lot of studies have reported the effect of ginseng and ginsenosides on the hyperactive/impulsive behaviors in psychiatric diseases and conditions. Clinical studies showed that PG and Korean red ginseng (KRG) alleviated the hyperactivity/impulsivity in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [33, 34]. Additionally, in animal studies, ginsenosides relieved the hyperactive behaviors, along with reducing the behavioral sensitization and conditioned place preference in cocaine- [35], methamphetamine- [36], morphine- [37], and nicotine-treated mice [38, 39]. In addition to these behavioral effects, several studies reported that ginseng and ginsenosides could suppress the enhanced central dopaminergic transmission including dopamine-releasing and/or binding to dopamine receptors [36–39]. However, the mechanism on the alleviating effect of ginseng or ginsenosides against manic behaviors is still not largely elucidated.In our study, through RNA-seq, we found that PG could regulate potently the glutamatergic synapse pathway genes in the prefrontal cortex of SD rats. The expressions of Slc1a3, Slc1a2, Adcy1, Grik3, Grin3a, and Gng2 were increased by the PG treatment in SD rats. We also paid attention to the amphetamine addiction pathway genes such as Camk2a, Arc, and Grin3a. The expressions of Camk2a and Grin3a were upregulated by the PG treatment in SD rats, whereas the expression of Arc was downregulated. Among these genes, we expected that Slc1a3, Gng2, and Arc might be candidate genes related to the alleviating effect of PG on manic-like behaviors of SD rats. Intriguingly, these genes were not only detected as DEGs in the comparison between SD and control but also PG treatment restored the expression changes of these genes in SD rats. In qRT-PCR, we also observed the expression changes on Slc1a3 and Arc, similar to the RNA-seq result, but not on Gng2. SD attenuated the expression of Slc1a3 and enhanced the expression of Arc, whereas PG relieved SD-induced expression changes. Moreover, we found the additional candidate gene Slc1a2. Although in the DEG analysis between the control and SD, Slc1a2 was excluded by∣FC∣ cutoff of ≥2 (FC=−1.7; Table 2); qRT-PCR showed that the expression of Slc1a2 was significantly reduced by SD and PG ameliorated the reduced expression, consistent with our RNA-seq result. However, differently from the RNA-seq result, the expressions of Adcy1, Grik3, Grin3a, and Gng2 were not upregulated by PG treatment in SD rats. This inconsistency may be attributed to the expression volume of the gene that was the geometric mean of the two groups’ expression levels. Even though ∣FC∣ might be different by twofold, the expression change of gene with higher volume may be more credible [40]. In our RNA-seq result, Slc1a3, Slc1a2, Camk2a, and Arc showed higher expression volumes than Adcy1, Grik3, Ginr3a, and Gng2 (data not shown). Although the expression changes of Adcy1, Grik3, Grin3a, and Gng2 were not detected in qRT-PCR (Figure 2); instead, we could acquire the confidence on the expression changes of Slc1a3, Slc1a2, Camk2a, and Arc. We focused on Slc1a3, Slc1a2, and Arc and examined their protein expressions. SD reduced the protein expressions of Slc1a3 and Slc1a2 and elevated the expression of Arc. In comparison, PG treatment inhibited SD-induced these expression changes (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)).The concentrations of glutamate in the extracellular space are maintained by glutamate transporters. Glutamate transporters, Slc1a and Slc1a3, were potently located in the plasma membranes of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Those remove approximately 95% of the extracellular glutamate [41]. The glutamatergic neurotransmission has been involved in the pathophysiology and treatment of mania and BPD. The elevated levels of glutamate have been reported in patients with BPD [42, 43]. A mood stabilizer, valproic acid, was reported to increase the levels of Slc1a2 and Slc1a3 and the capacity of glutamate uptake in the rat hippocampus [44] and also to decrease the glutamate levels in mice whole brain [45]. Given these reports, PG may attenuate the synaptic glutamate level, enhancing the glutamate uptake via increasing the expression levels of Slc1a and Slc1a3 in SD rats. Thus, it may contribute to suppressing the glutamatergic synaptic activity, resulting in decreasing the mRNA and protein levels of Arc in SD rats.The immediate-early gene Arc, which is considered as a plasticity-related gene, plays a key role in the long-term potentiation, long-term depression, and synaptic transmission [46, 47]. Glutamate could increase the mRNA and protein expression of Arc in neurons. The increase of Arc expression in the excitatory neurons was dependent on NMDA receptor, which is one of three types of ionotropic glutamate receptors [48, 49]. In comparison, another ionotropic glutamate receptor, alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor, was reported to negatively regulate the Arc transcription or not to affect the level of Arc [48, 50]. Given these previous reports, the alteration of Arc expressions in SD and PG-treated SD rats may be mediated via the regulation of NMDA receptor activity.The NMDA receptor forms a tetramer by three different subunits: NR1, NR2, and NR3. Heterotetrameric NMDA receptor is broadly expressed in the brain, which consisted of two obligatory glycine-binding NR1 subunits and two regionally localized glutamate-binding NR2 subunits, particularly NR2A and NR2B. We examined the effect of PG on the NMDA receptor, focusing on the NR2 subunits containing the glutamate binding site. Previous studies have reported the involvement of the phosphorylation of NR2 subunits in the action of lithium. Lithium inhibited the tyrosine phosphorylation of the NR2A subunit, together with the decreased interaction of NR2A with the Src family tyrosine kinases in the rat hippocampus following cerebral ischemia [51]. Lithium also suppressed the tyrosine phosphorylation of the NR2B subunit in cultured cortical neurons [52]. The tyrosine phosphorylations of NR2A including Y1325 could potentiate the NMDA receptor currents [53, 54]. In comparison, the phosphorylation of NR2B Y1472 inhibited the endocytosis of the NR2B-containing NMDA receptor, leading to the stabilization of the receptor on the cell surface [55]. Interestingly, we found that SD increased the tyrosine phosphorylation of the NR2A subunit (Y1325), whereas PG alleviated the SD-induced phosphorylation. However, the phosphorylation of the NR2B subunit (Y1472) was induced by neither SD nor PG treatment. Therefore, our result indicated that PG might relieve the glutamate neurotransmission activated in SD rats, regulating the potential of the NMDA receptor currents rather than the surface expression or stabilizing of the receptor. There were some limitations in our RNA-seq result. In the DEG analysis, we did not determine the differential expressions by FDR-corrected p value <0.05. However, after selecting the candidate genes related to the effect of PG on SD of DEGs, we validated the mRNA expressions of candidate genes using the qRT-PCR as well as the expression levels of proteins encoded by the genes using immunoblotting.


## 5. Conclusions

In the present study, we found that PG could increase the mRNA and protein expressions of Slc1a3 and Slc1a2 in the prefrontal cortex of PG-treated SD rats. The increase of the expressions of Slc1a3 and Slc1a2 by PG may lead to the decrease of the extracellular glutamate levels. In turn, it would reduce the NMDA receptor activation and the expression level of Arc in SD rats. The attenuated glutamatergic neurotransmission by PG would contribute to the reduction of mania-like behaviors in SD rats. These results suggested the useful therapeutic effect of PG on the management of a manic phase of BPD.



---

*Source: 3636874-2020-10-17.xml*