# Investigation of Structural, Magnetic, and Optical Properties of ZnO Codoped with  Co and Cd

Authors: Lubna Mustafa; Safia Anjum; Salma Waseem; Rehana Zia; Rameesha Choudhry; Shahid M. Ramay; Asif Mahmood; Shahid Atiq; Salah Ud-Din Khan
Journal: Advances in Condensed Matter Physics
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Co and Cd have been codoped in ZnO using a simple solid state reaction technique to synthesize dilute magnetic oxide semiconductors of composition Zn0.9Co0.1−xCdxO (x=0.0-0.1 with an increment of 0.02). Hexagonal wurtzite structure has been obtained for samples up to x=0.06, using X-ray diffractometry. However, at x=0.08 and 0.1, secondary peak of CdO is observed. Raman spectra of the samples have been obtained in 200–800 cm−1 range. UV-VIS spectrophotometer is used to study the optical properties, which shows that band gap energy decreases with the increase in Cd concentration. A weak ferromagnetic behavior was evident which decreased further by adding Cd in the series. Room temperature resistivity measurements performed using four-point probe technique showed that their values lie in the semiconductor range. Structural morphology of the samples has been investigated by a scanning electron microscope and grain size has been determined. Raman spectra and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed the successful incorporation of Co and Cd ions into the host ZnO lattice.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dilute magnetic oxide semiconductors (DMS) are a class of materials in which a fraction of ions are magnetic. The main concern in magnetic semiconductor research is the interaction between semiconductor band electrons (e.g., charge carriers or impurity states) and magnetic moments of the ions. This interaction results in a range of electronic phenomena, such as giant magnetoresistance, strong magneto-optical rotation, magnetically driven semiconductor-metal transition, and magnetic polaron effects. The presence of semiconducting and magnetic properties in these compounds and the ability to independently control them offer the possibilities for a number of technological and scientific opportunities [1, 2]. The magnetic interactions in II-VI DMSs, for example, in ZnO, are dominated by antiferromagnetic exchange among the spins of a proper dopant, which results in the paramagnetic, antiferromagnetic, or spin-glass behavior of the materials [3, 4]. Ferromagnetism in codoped ZnO was first found by Ueda et al. [5] in thin films. A few research groups have fabricated bulk samples of Mn and Co doped ZnO by different synthesis routes. It is observed that, with low concentration of Co, material is paramagnetic. At 5 at%, some secondary phases were witnessed and were suggested as a source of magnetism [6]. ZnO doped with Ni showed super paramagnetic behavior at 300 K and charge carriers mediated ferromagnetic state was established at 2 K [7]. Nevertheless, room temperature ferromagnetism in Zn1-xMxO (M = Co, Ni, Fe) is still controversial, because of contradictory reports from many experimental studies [8].Donor states are produced by intrinsic defects in ZnO as it has been observed that (Zn, Ni)O, (Zn, Fe)O, and (Zn, Co)O show ferromagnetism with a Curie temperature (Tc) in the absence of carrier concentration [9]. The addition of carriers in doped ZnO is found to increase this ferromagnetic behavior. Appearance of secondary phases at high dopant concentration and high annealing temperature motivated the researchers towards simultaneous doping of two or more transition metal ions in ZnO [10]. The above discussion led the present work to explore the characteristic properties of Co and Cd codoped ZnO based DMS materials.In this paper, we present the synthesis of dilute magnetic oxide semiconductors with compositionZn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x=0.0-0.1 by an increment of 0.02) using a simple and low cast solid state reaction method. The effect of Co and Cd codoping on the structural, magnetic, and optical response of ZnO has been investigated.


## 2. Materials and Methods

A series of six samples having general formulaZn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x = 0.0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08 & 1.0) were prepared by solid state reaction method. This method has been adopted due to its simplicity and economical value. In addition, it allows chemical reactions without the need of solvents. Stoichiometric amounts of analytical grade reagents like ZnO, CoO, and CdO were separately weighed using a precise electronic balance. The oxide powders were mixed and milled using a ball milling machine for 45 minutes. After sieving, calcination of the raw samples was carried out at 850°C for 16 h in high temperature furnace.The resultant samples were characterized for structural properties using D-8 Discover X-ray diffractometer (XRD). Raman spectroscopy and MIDAC 2000 (USA) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were performed to determine the incorporation of dopants in the host matrix. The FTIR spectroscopy was performed using background subtractor scan range of 400–4500 with wavelength range of 300–900 nm. UV-visible spectrometry (UV-VIS, UV2800, Hitachi, Japan) was employed to find the optical band gap of the samples. Structural morphology was investigated using a S-3400N Hitachi scanning electron microscope (SEM). Magnetic properties were determined using a Lakeshore 7436 vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM).


## 3. Results and Discussion

Crystal structure of the samples has been investigated by XRD using CuKα radiations with λ=0.154 nm. Figure 1 shows diffraction patterns of Zn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x = 0.0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, and 0.1). The patterns reveal that the samples below x=0.06 consist of hexagonal wurtzite structure, as all the peaks were matched with the standard JCPD card, characteristic of ZnO structure. As the doping concentration of Cd was raised to 6%, some impurity peaks began to peep. The intensity of these impurity peaks became significant as the doping concentration was raised above 6%. These peaks were identified as belonging to CdO, one of the reactants. The possible reason might be attributed to its excess value and/or insufficient reaction temperature. The most intense diffraction peak was utilized to find various structural parameters. Lattice parameters a and c were determined manually by using
(1)sin2θ=λ24a243h2+hk+k2+l2c/a2,
where d is the interplanar distance and hkl are the miller indices of the corresponding plane. It was found that a and c increased with the increase in the Cd concentration in the series. This increase could be attributed to the larger ionic radius of Cd2+ as compared to Co2+.Figure 1
XRD pattern ofZn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x = 0.0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, and 0.1).The crystallite size has been calculated by Scherrer’s formula [11], given as
(2)D=kλBcos⁡θ,
where B is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) in radians, θ is Bragg’s angle, λ represents the wavelength (λ=0.154 nm) of Cu Kα radiation, and “D” is the crystallite size. The evaluated crystalline sizes were in 70–100 nm range.Raman spectroscopy ofZn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x = 0.0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, and 0.08) samples in the range 200–800 cm−1 is shown in Figure 2. All the labeled modes belong to ZnO. The main dominant peak (E2) is found in the range 430–433 cm−1 for all samples. Theoretically calculated value of E2 is 436 cm−1 called Raman optical active phonon mode, characteristic of wurtzite hexagonal phase, also associated with ZnO structure. E2 values slightly shift towards lower frequency side. This shift may be due to structural disorder because of secondary peaks and different ionic radii of Co and Cd dopants [12].Figure 2
Raman spectra ofZn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x = 0.0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, and 0.08).FTIR is a technique used to obtain information about the chemical bonding in a material. Figure3 shows comparative FTIR spectra of all the six samples. Distinct absorption peak around 468.9 cm−1 for all the samples represents stretching bond for Zn–O mode [13]. The peak at 1651 cm−1 is due to water molecules in KBr, which has been used in the preparation of samples for FTIR analysis. A small absorption peak observed around 2436–2438 cm−1 is due to the existence of CO2 molecule in air. The broad absorption peaks centered at 3467 cm−1 are attributed to O–H stretching vibration of H2O in Zn–O lattice. The gradual shift in the absorption frequency is due to the different bond lengths that occur when Co2+ and Cd2+ ions replace Zn2+ ions. This assures the integration of Co and Cd ions into ZnO lattice.Figure 3
FTIR spectra ofZn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x = 0.0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, and 0.1).UV-visible spectroscopy technique determines the absorbance, reflectance, and transmission through a sample. The absorption spectra help us find the band gap, which is an important characteristic of a semiconductor. Direct band gap energy “Eg” is calculated by using Tauc’s equation, given as
(3)αhν2=Bhν-Eg.
Here, “B” is a constant known as band tailing parameter. The band gap values are calculated by plotting graph of αhν2 versus hν and extrapolating straight line down to αhν2=0, as shown in Figure 4. The band gap value of 10% Co doped sample was found to be 3.73 eV, which was more than that of pure ZnO, in accordance with some recent results [14, 15]. Band gap values of Zn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x = 0.00, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08 & 0.10) shift to the lower energy from 3.73 to 2.37 eV, as listed in Table 1. The red shift shows that the dopants have successfully blended into the lattice of ZnO. The sp-d exchange interaction between band electrons and d electrons of Co2+and Cd2+ ions that are substituting Zn2+ ions causes the narrowing of band gaps. It has been understood that, with the increased concentration of dopant species, energy levels or overlapping orbitals increases and width of the band starts to increase, which cause a decrease in the band gap energy.Table 1
Band gap energy, magnetization, and coercivity ofZn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x = 0.0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, and 0.1).
Samples
Band gap (eV)
MagnetizationM (emu/g) ×10−1
CoercivityHc (Oe)
x = 0.0
3.74
3.90
46.09
x = 0.02
3.71
1.60
2.915
x = 0.04
2.83
1.22
2.739
x = 0.06
2.63
0.65
2.683
x = 0.08
2.45
0.42
2.915
x = 0.1
2.38
0.15
8.335Plot ofαhν2 versus energy of (a) Zn0.9Co0.1Cd0.0O and (b) Zn0.9Co0.04Cd0.06O.
(a)
(b)The effect of various dopants to decrease the optical band gap has been explained by many groups who have suggested the alloying effect in the host compound and the presence of some impurity phases as the main cause to affectEg [16].Surface morphology of prepared samples was studied by SEM. Representative SEM micrographs ofZn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x = 0.0, 0.04 & 0.1) and EDX spectra of Zn0.9Co0.06Cd0.04O have been shown in Figure 5. The micrographs show high crystallinity of samples because of development of grains with well-defined boundaries. The size of grains, determined by line intercept method, was found to increase from 0.3 μm to 0.7 μm in the series of samples. The EDX spectra confirmed the stoichiometric at% and wt% of all the elements in the samples in accordance with the theoretical calculations, as revealed by the representative spectra of sample Zn0.9Co0.06Ni0.04O shown in Figure 5(d).SEM micrographs of (a) Zn0.9Co0.1O, (b) Zn0.9Co0.06Cd0.04O, (c) Zn0.9Cd0.1O, and (d) EDX of Zn0.9Co0.06Cd0.04O.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The magnetic properties of all the samples were studied using VSM at room temperature. The magnetic hysteresis (M-H) loops of first three samples are shown in Figure 6 and the last three are shown in Figure 7, displaying a weak ferromagnetic behavior. In the sample x=0.0, the value of magnetization (M) is maximum (0.390 emu/g). This is because maximum Co spins are ferromagnetically (FM) coupled and few are antiferromagnetically coupled or uncoupled [17]. As concentration of Cd increases, magnetization decreases and becomes lowest (0.015 emu/g) at x=0.1. This is because FM coupling between Co2+⋯Co2+ ions decreases by the addition of Cd2+ into the material, since all the d shell of Cd is fully occupied. Furthermore, when Cd is added into the material the lattice parameter a increases due to larger ionic radii of Cd, and magnetization shows a sensitive behavior to such changes [18]. An increase in lattice parameter shows greater (Co, Cd⋯Co, Cd) distances, which will ultimately influence their magnetic interactions and cause lowering of magnetization.Figure 6
M-H loop of Zn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x = 0.0, 0.02, and 0.04). The inset shows corresponding magnified loops.Figure 7
M-H loop of Zn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x = 0.06, 0.08, and 0.1). The inset shows corresponding magnified loops.The development of secondary phase is also considered as source of magnetization in DMS materials. In the present case, fromx≥0.06, a secondary phase of CdO has been observed. However, this phase could not contribute towards magnetization as it decreased with increased CdO contents in the samples. Higher carrier concentration induces magnetization but the resistivity of our samples is found to be of the order of 108–109 Ω-m. This indicates low carrier concentration, so the carrier induced magnetization cannot be considered here.The value of coercivity decreased from 46.1 Oe to 8.34 Oe in the series, listed in Table1, as grain size increases from 0.3 μm to 0.7 μm. It is due to the fact that large grain size produces less grain boundaries which are magnetically isolated from neighboring grains and it requires lesser magnetizing force for magnetization.


## 4. Conclusions

A series ofZn0.9Co0.1-xCdxO (x = 0.00, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, and 0.10) samples was synthesized by solid state reaction method. The samples up to x=0.06 exhibit hexagonal wurtzite structure same as that of host material. The main dominant peak around 430–433 cm−1 corresponds to hexagonal wurtzite structure found by Raman spectra. The absorption peak around 468.9 cm−1 for all the samples represents stretching bond for Zn–O mode. A weak ferromagnetic behavior was observed in the samples, but the saturation value of magnetization could not be attained. Synthesized samples possess optimum semiconducting and magnetic characteristics that could be exploited for potential spintronic applications.



---

*Source: 362864-2014-11-24.xml*