# Case Series of Monoamniotic and Pseudomonoamniotic Twin Gestations

Authors: Shunji Suzuki
Journal: ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated a series of 18 monoamniotic and 7 pseudomonoamniotic (secondary to rupture in the membrane dividing monochorionic diamniotic twins) twin gestations managed after 20 weeks’ gestation. There were no significant differences in the incidence of neonatal death or umbilical cord entanglement between the monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations (33 versus 21%,P=0.94 and 72 versus 43%, P=0.36). Therefore, the same serious management may be needed for pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations as for monoamniotic twin gestations.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Monoamniotic twinning is a rare complication, occurring in less than 1% of monozygosity and is associated with a significant mortality rate [1, 2]. The most common cause of perinatal mortality in monoamniotic twins has been reported to be cord entanglement [1, 2]. Cord entanglement has been reported in up to 70% of monoamniotic twins with 50% or more of deaths attributed to this complication [3]. Recently, some cases of disruption of the dividing membrane in monochorionic diamniotic twin gestation as pseudomonoamniotic twin gestation [4–13]. In some previous reports, pseudomonoamniotic twin gestation sometimes has been also observed to be complicated by umbilical cord entanglement. In addition, some cases of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by spontaneous antepartum rupture of the intertwin-dividing membrane (and umbilical cord entanglement) without any perinatal episodes have been reported [12, 13]; however, there have been few investigations comparing the perinatal outcomes in pseudomonoamniotic twins with those in true monoamniotic twins. Therefore, in this study, we examined the perinatal outcomes of these pregnancies.


## 2. Methods

We retrospectively evaluated a series of 18 monoamniotic and 7 pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations managed after 20 weeks’ gestation at our hospital (these contain the cases we reported previously [6–8, 14]). The diagnosis of monoamnionicity and pseudomonoamnionicity was determined on the basis of ultrasound features and it was confirmed by clinical presentations at delivery, such as the presence of disruption of the dividing membrane and histological examination of the placenta. The histology of the placenta and umbilical cord entanglement were examined at the time of delivery. Cases of congenital anomalies such as anencephaly and acardiac twins were excluded. In addition, the pregnancies were excluded, if fetal demise at least one twin at <20 weeks’ gestation was diagnosed. The gestational age of the pregnancies was established by ultrasonographic examination of the fetal crown-rump length at 8–11 weeks’ gestation.In our hospitals, elective cesarean at preterm for (true and pseudo-) monoamniotic twin gestations as previously reported [15, 16] was not performed without maternal request, if fetuses were well and the patient had no maternal complications. In monoamniotic twin gestations, twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) was diagnosed with the clinical presentations, such as cardiac dysfunction, discordance in bladder size, and/or polyhydramnios.Cases and controls were compared by theχ2 or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Differences with P<0.05 were considered significant.


## 3. Results

Table1 shows the summary of perinatal findings in the 18 (true) monoamniotic twin gestations. The incidence of perinatal loss per total number of neonates was 33% (12/36). Four cases (22%) resulted in double death, while 4 (22%) cases resulted in single death. The incidence of cerebral injury per total number of lived neonates was 13% (3/24). The incidence of umbilical cord entanglement was 72% (13/18). There were no cases of severe congenital heart anomalies. Based on the clinical presentations, 2 cases (11%: cases 4 and 9) were suggested to be complicated by TTTS.Table 1
Summary of perinatal findings in 18 monoamniotic twin gestations.
Number
GA at delivery
Twin A
Twin B
UC entanglement
Other complications
1
20
IUFD
IUFD
Yes
2
22
IUFD
IUFD
Yes
3
28
CP
IUFD
Yes
4
28
Neonatal death
IUFD (22 weeks)
No
Oligohydramnios following polyhydramnios
5
29
CP
Healthy
Yes
Hydrops
6
30
IUFD (26 weeks)
Healthy
Yes
7
31
Healthy
Healthy
Yes
8
32
Healthy
Healthy
No
9
32
IUFD (28 weeks)
PVL
No
Hydrops (IUFD), polyhydramnios
10
33
IUFD
IUFD
Yes
11
34
Healthy
Healthy
Yes
12
35
Healthy
Healthy
Yes
13
36
Healthy
Healthy
Yes
14
36
Healthy
Healthy
Yes
15
37
Healthy
Healthy
Yes
16
37
Healthy
Healthy
No
17
38
Healthy
Healthy
Yes
18
39
Healthy
IUFD (20 weeks)
No
GA: gestational age; UC: umbilical cord; IUFD: intrauterine fetal death; CP: cerebral palsy; PVL: periventricular leukomalacia.Table2 shows the summary of perinatal findings in the 7 pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations. In 3 cases of these (43%), the disruption of the dividing membrane was associated with the therapies (amniocentesis and fetoscopic laser photocoagulation) for TTTS. As our impression, at the deliveries the area of the perforated portions of dividing membranes seemed to be large enough to lead to umbilical cord entanglement. Of 4 cases with spontaneous membrane rupture, 2 mothers (cases 5 and 7) felt the amniotic fluid flow due to membrane rupture of the second twin before labor. The incidence of perinatal loss per total number of neonates was 21% (3/14). One case (14%) resulted in double death, while 1 (14%) case resulted in single death during the second trimester. The incidence of umbilical cord entanglement was 43% (3/7). There were no cases of cerebral injury or severe congenital heart anomalies.Table 2
Summary of perinatal findings in 7 pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations.
Number
GA at delivery
Twin A
Twin B
UC entanglement
Cause of membrane rupture
1
27
IUFD
IUFD
No
Amnioreduction due to TTTS
2
28
Healthy
IUFD (21 weeks)
Yes
Single IUFD
3
31
Healthy
Healthy
No
FLP due to TTTS
4
33
Healthy
Healthy
No
FLP due to TTTS
5
35
Healthy
Healthy
No
Unknown
6
36
Healthy
Healthy
Yes
Unknown
7
37
Healthy
Healthy
Yes
Unknown
GA: gestational age; UC: umbilical cord; IUFD: intrauterine fetal death; TTTS: twin-twin transfusion syndrome; FLP: fetoscopic laser photocoagulation.There were no significant differences in the incidence of neonatal death or umbilical cord entanglement between the monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations (P=0.94 and 0.36). Thirteen of 15 perinatal losses (87%) were occurred before 32 weeks of gestation.


## 4. Discussion

To date, some possible mechanisms leading to antepartum rupture of the intertwin-dividing membrane except artificial septostomy, such as amniocentesis and fetoscopic laser photocoagulation, have been proposed, such as infection (chorioamnionitis) [9], developmental disturbance [9], trauma or physical rupture by fetuses [10], and intrauterine sling formation [11]. In addition, some cases of spontaneous antepartum rupture, in which the exact cause of rupture of membrane cannot be well determined, have been reported. In our 7 cases of pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations, 3 cases were artificial and 4 cases were spontaneous.We know that the sample size of this study is very small; however, the current results may indicate that the perinatal outcomes of pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations do not differ from those of true monoamniotic twin gestations. Based on the results, the incidence of umbilical cord entanglement, which is the most critical concern in twin gestations, in monoamniotic twins seemed to be similar to that in pseudomonoamniotic twins. As our impression, the area of the perforated portions of dividing membranes seemed to be large enough to lead to umbilical cord entanglement. In addition, there was no significant difference in perinatal loss between the monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twins. Therefore, the same serious management may be needed for pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations as for monoamniotic twin gestations.In this study, the total incidence of perinatal death in monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations seemed to be high as previously reported [1, 2]; however, 87% of perinatal losses were occurred before 32 weeks of gestation, and there was no occurrence of new perinatal deaths after 34 weeks of gestation. In some literatures, the recommended timing of delivery range to prevent sudden intrauterine fetal death has been reported to be between 32 and 34 weeks [1, 15, 16]. However, the current result may support the other articles that the incidence of fetal death after 32 weeks is not high in monoamniotic twins [17, 18], which is suggesting that prophylactic preterm delivery may not be indicated in all monoamniotic twin gestations. Therefore, a further large study may be needed concerning the appropriate timing of delivery for monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twins.


## 5. Conclusion

The same management is needed for monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations.



---

*Source: 369419-2013-02-21.xml*