# Synthesis of Flexible Aerogel Composites Reinforced with Electrospun Nanofibers and Microparticles for Thermal Insulation

Authors: Huijun Wu; Yantao Chen; Qiliang Chen; Yunfei Ding; Xiaoqing Zhou; Haitao Gao
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Flexible silica aerogel composites in intact monolith of 12 cm were successfully fabricated by reinforcing SiO2 aerogel with electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) webs via electrospinning and sol-gel processing. Three electrospun PVDF webs with different microstructures (e.g., nanofibers, microparticles, and combined nanofibers and microparticles) were fabricated by regulating electrospinning parameters. The as-electrospun PVDF webs with various microstructures were impregnated into the silica sol to synthesize the PVDF/SiO2 composites followed by solvent exchange, surface modification, and drying at ambient atmosphere. The morphologies of the PVDF/SiO2 aerogel composites were characterized and the thermal and mechanical properties were measured. The effects of electrospun PVDF on the thermal and mechanical properties of the aerogel composites were evaluated. The aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF nanofibers showed intact monolith, improved strength, and perfect flexibility and hydrophobicity. Moreover, the aerogel composites reinforced with the electrospun PVDF nanofibers had the lowest thermal conductivity (0.028 W·m−1·K−1). It indicates that the electrospun PVDF nanofibers could greatly improve the mechanical strength and flexibility of the SiO2 aerogels while maintaining a lower thermal conductivity, which provides increasing potential for thermal insulation applications.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Silica aerogel is a highly porous material with pore diameters in the range of 2–50 nm [1, 2]. The nanoporous structure of the silica aerogels having a high porosity above 90% makes the aerogels a highly thermal insulating materials with a super-low thermal conductivity as low as 0.013 W·m−1·K−1. The silica aerogels have well been acknowledged as one of the most attracting thermal insulation materials for wide applications in aircrafts and aerospace, chemical engineering, building constructions, and so forth [3–5]. However, the silica aerogels generally have poor mechanical stability (e.g., low strength and high brittleness) owing to their nanoporous nature and high porosity. The flexural strength of the pure silica aerogel with the density of 0.1 g·cm−3 was approximately 0.02 MPa [6] and the collapse strength under compression of the silica aerogel with the density of 0.21 g·cm−3 was approximately 2.5 MPa [7]. The low flexural and collapse strength of the aerogels greatly limited their applications for thermal insulation.Besides strengthening the aerogel framework by optimizing the sol-gel techniques [8], adding reinforced fibers into the silica aerogels and synthesizing the fiber-reinforced aerogel composites have become one of the most effective methods so as to improve the mechanical properties of the aerogels [2]. Various inorganic fibers [9–11] such as glass fibers, mullite fibers, ceramic fibers, and aluminum fibers were used to reinforce the aerogels. The previous literatures [9, 10] showed that the organic fibers could significantly improve the compressing strength of the aerogels. Moreover, the inorganic fibers could improve the shielding ability of the aerogels to the heat radiation at high temperature. However, owing to the brittleness of the inorganic fibers, the aerogel composites reinforced by the inorganic fibers were brittle and less flexible. Feng et al. [12] synthesized the carbon aerogel composites reinforced by carbon fibers via the pyrolysis of the resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF) aerogels reinforced with oxidized polyacrylonitrile (PAN). Finlay et al. [13] impregnated the 2-mm-length short-cut natural polymer fibers into clay aerogels and achieved 4-time increase in compressive strength while only 20% increase in density. Compared to the inorganic fibers, the organic fibers have better flexibility so that the organic fibers are advantageous to synthesize flexible aerogel composites.The previous literatures [9–13] on the aerogel composites focused on the reinforcements of the inorganic and organic fibers with the diameters in dozens of or several microns. The diameters of the reinforced fibers are greatly greater than those of the holes and the particles of the SiO2 aerogels (namely, in several or dozens of nanometers). The great difference in the sizes of the reinforced fibers and the aerogel matrix leads to a great difference of the strains of the fibers and aerogels during the drying process of the fiber/aerogel composites. It often results in great cracks and weak mechanical stability of the fiber reinforced aerogel composites [14]. Therefore, reducing the diameters of the reinforced fibers and decreasing the difference of the sizes of the reinforced fibers and the aerogel matrix may improve the monolith integrity and the mechanical stability of the fiber/aerogel composites.Electrospinning is a simple and low-cost method for making polymer and ceramic fibers with superfine diameters [15–17]. In recent years, it has attracted an increasing interest in the electrospinning technique owing to the promising properties of the electrospun nanofibers. Various structured and assembled nanofibers have been developed via electrospinning for specific functions and wide applications [18–20]. Very recently, Li et al. [21] developed a type of SiO2 aerogel composite reinforced with electrospun poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)/Elast-Eon TM (E2A) nanofibers via hybrid film casting and nanofiber electrospinning. Since the electrospun PEO/E2A nanofibers had the diameter of approximately 500 nm which was significantly finer than common inorganic and organic fibers and more closer to the size of the SiO2 aerogels, the aerogel composites reinforced with the electrospun PEO/E2A nanofibers developed by Li et al. [21] showed intact morphology, little cracks, and good flexibility. However, the size of the flexible aerogel composite specimen prepared by Li et al. [21] was small (1.307 cm × 1.264 cm × 0.0857 cm). Moreover, the thermal conductivity of the aerogel composites was significanlty increased to 0.0505 W/(m·K) owing to the limitation of the fabrication technique. Therefore, although the electrospun nanofibers have been proposed to strengthen the aerogels, the preparation technique of the electrospun nanofibers reinforced aerogel composites with larger size, and lower thermal conductivity has to be further developed.In this paper, flexible SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF web were synthesized via electrospinning and sol-gel processing. Three electrospun PVDF webs with different microstructures are fabricated and then used to reinforce the SiO2 aerogels. The effects of the electrospun PVDF on the thermal conductivity and the mechanical properties of the SiO2 aerogels composites are evaluated.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Tetraethylorthosilicate (>98%, TEOS), ethylalcohol (>99%, EtOH), N,N-dimenthyl-formamide (>98%, DMF),N-hexane (>99%), and trimethylchlorosilane (>95%, TMCS) were purchased from Baishi Co. Ltd. (China) and used as received. Hydrochloric acid (37%, HCl) and ammonia (25%, NH4OH) were purchased from Guanghua Co. Ltd. (China) and used after diluted 10-fold with deionized water. PVDF was purchased from Baishi Co. Ltd. (China).


### 2.2. Electrospinning of PVDF Web

PVDF solutions with certain concentrations (namely, 18 wt.%, 23 wt.%, and 28 wt.%) were prepared by dissolving PVDF particles in DMF in a water bath at 65°C under magnetic stirring for 6 h, followed by cooling to room temperature with continuation of stirring for another 6 h. The PVDF solutions were, respectively, inserted into a plastic syringe with a stainless steel nozzle with the diameter of 1.0 mm for electrospinning by using an electrospinning apparatus (Model: NEU) from Kato Tech Co. Ltd., Japan. The apparatus consists of a syringe pump for supplying the PVDF solution, a grounded electrode for collecting the fibres, and a DC power for supplying high voltage. In the electrospinning process, the voltage of 13 kV was applied to the stainless steel connected with the PVDF solution. The distance of the nozzle and the collecting electrodes was 15 cm. The electrospun PVDF webs with a certain thickness were collected via electrospinning for about 5 days. The PVDF webs were dried at 80°C for 12 h before being used to reinforce the SiO2 aerogels.


### 2.3. Preparation of Silica Sol

100 mL silica sol was prepared by a two-step acid/base catalyzed sol-gel process. In the first step, TEOS, EtOH, deionized H2O, and HCl were mixed in the molar ratio 1 : 7 :  1  :  1 × 10−5 and magnetically stirred for 30 mins. The solution was then refluxed for 24 h at room temperature. In the second step, DMF, H2O, and NH4OH were added into the stock solution and stirred for 30 mins. The final molar ratio of TMOS : EtOH : H2O : DMF : HCl : NH4OH is 1 : 7 : 2 : 0.25 : 10−5 : 3.57 × 10−3.


### 2.4. Synthesis of SiO2 Aerogel Composites Reinforced with Electrospun PVDF Web

The electrospun PVDF webs were added into the silica sol as framework and the PVDF/SiO2 composites were obtained. The PVDF/SiO2 composite gelled to monoliths after 0.5–1 h. The composite gels were kept at room temperature for 2 days for further solidification to form silica monoliths. These monoliths were aged in H2O/EtOH (1 : 4, vol.) solution for 24 h and then TEOS/EtOH (1 : 4, vol.) solution to strengthen the gel network. The water and ethanol solvents in the pores of the wet gel were exchanged with isopropanol and n-hexane, respectively. After being immersed in a solution of 10% vol. TMCS/n-hexane at 35°C for about 8 h for surface modification, the monoliths were washed in n-hexane for 32 h. The SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs were synthesized by drying the monoliths at 70°C for 12 h followed by further drying at 100°C for 12 h.


### 2.5. Instruments and Characterizations

The as-synthesized SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs were coated with gold/palladium to be investigated on their morphology and microstructure by using a 1530VP scanning election microscopy (SEM, LEO, Germany). The thermal conductivity was measured by a TPS2500 thermal conductivity apparatus (Hot Disk, Germany) in terms of a transient plane heat source method at room temperature. The testing power and period of the thermal conductivity apparatus were 10 mW and 20 s, respectively. The thermostability of the aerogel composites was measured by using a TGA400 thermal gravimetric analyzer (TG, PerkinElmer, USA) at the heating rate of 10°C/min, respectively. The surface hydrophobicity of the aerogel composites was determined using a Kruss DSA100 droplet scanning analysis (DSA, Germany) at a static analysis mode.The bulk density of the aerogel composite was determined by measuring the weight and volume of the aerogel composites. The compression tests of the aerogel composite were carried out on a WHY-50 automatic pressure testing machine (Hualong, China) at a time-displacement model with a loading speed of 2 mm/min. The bending modulus of the aerogel composites was investigated with a three-point flexural bending method on a CMT6104 universal testing machine (Sunthink, China) with a loading speed of 5 mm/min at room temperature [9].


## 2.1. Materials

Tetraethylorthosilicate (>98%, TEOS), ethylalcohol (>99%, EtOH), N,N-dimenthyl-formamide (>98%, DMF),N-hexane (>99%), and trimethylchlorosilane (>95%, TMCS) were purchased from Baishi Co. Ltd. (China) and used as received. Hydrochloric acid (37%, HCl) and ammonia (25%, NH4OH) were purchased from Guanghua Co. Ltd. (China) and used after diluted 10-fold with deionized water. PVDF was purchased from Baishi Co. Ltd. (China).


## 2.2. Electrospinning of PVDF Web

PVDF solutions with certain concentrations (namely, 18 wt.%, 23 wt.%, and 28 wt.%) were prepared by dissolving PVDF particles in DMF in a water bath at 65°C under magnetic stirring for 6 h, followed by cooling to room temperature with continuation of stirring for another 6 h. The PVDF solutions were, respectively, inserted into a plastic syringe with a stainless steel nozzle with the diameter of 1.0 mm for electrospinning by using an electrospinning apparatus (Model: NEU) from Kato Tech Co. Ltd., Japan. The apparatus consists of a syringe pump for supplying the PVDF solution, a grounded electrode for collecting the fibres, and a DC power for supplying high voltage. In the electrospinning process, the voltage of 13 kV was applied to the stainless steel connected with the PVDF solution. The distance of the nozzle and the collecting electrodes was 15 cm. The electrospun PVDF webs with a certain thickness were collected via electrospinning for about 5 days. The PVDF webs were dried at 80°C for 12 h before being used to reinforce the SiO2 aerogels.


## 2.3. Preparation of Silica Sol

100 mL silica sol was prepared by a two-step acid/base catalyzed sol-gel process. In the first step, TEOS, EtOH, deionized H2O, and HCl were mixed in the molar ratio 1 : 7 :  1  :  1 × 10−5 and magnetically stirred for 30 mins. The solution was then refluxed for 24 h at room temperature. In the second step, DMF, H2O, and NH4OH were added into the stock solution and stirred for 30 mins. The final molar ratio of TMOS : EtOH : H2O : DMF : HCl : NH4OH is 1 : 7 : 2 : 0.25 : 10−5 : 3.57 × 10−3.


## 2.4. Synthesis of SiO2 Aerogel Composites Reinforced with Electrospun PVDF Web

The electrospun PVDF webs were added into the silica sol as framework and the PVDF/SiO2 composites were obtained. The PVDF/SiO2 composite gelled to monoliths after 0.5–1 h. The composite gels were kept at room temperature for 2 days for further solidification to form silica monoliths. These monoliths were aged in H2O/EtOH (1 : 4, vol.) solution for 24 h and then TEOS/EtOH (1 : 4, vol.) solution to strengthen the gel network. The water and ethanol solvents in the pores of the wet gel were exchanged with isopropanol and n-hexane, respectively. After being immersed in a solution of 10% vol. TMCS/n-hexane at 35°C for about 8 h for surface modification, the monoliths were washed in n-hexane for 32 h. The SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs were synthesized by drying the monoliths at 70°C for 12 h followed by further drying at 100°C for 12 h.


## 2.5. Instruments and Characterizations

The as-synthesized SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs were coated with gold/palladium to be investigated on their morphology and microstructure by using a 1530VP scanning election microscopy (SEM, LEO, Germany). The thermal conductivity was measured by a TPS2500 thermal conductivity apparatus (Hot Disk, Germany) in terms of a transient plane heat source method at room temperature. The testing power and period of the thermal conductivity apparatus were 10 mW and 20 s, respectively. The thermostability of the aerogel composites was measured by using a TGA400 thermal gravimetric analyzer (TG, PerkinElmer, USA) at the heating rate of 10°C/min, respectively. The surface hydrophobicity of the aerogel composites was determined using a Kruss DSA100 droplet scanning analysis (DSA, Germany) at a static analysis mode.The bulk density of the aerogel composite was determined by measuring the weight and volume of the aerogel composites. The compression tests of the aerogel composite were carried out on a WHY-50 automatic pressure testing machine (Hualong, China) at a time-displacement model with a loading speed of 2 mm/min. The bending modulus of the aerogel composites was investigated with a three-point flexural bending method on a CMT6104 universal testing machine (Sunthink, China) with a loading speed of 5 mm/min at room temperature [9].


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Microstructures of Three Electrospun PVDF Webs from Different Concentrations

Figure1 shows the morphologies and microstructures of the three electrospun PVDF webs from the different PVDF/DMF solutions with various concentration (namely, 18 wt.%, 23 wt.%, 28 wt.%). Figures 1(a)–1(f) are the optical images of the three electrospun PVDF webs cut in circles with the diameter about 12 cm. It can be observed that the two PVDF webs electrospun from the 23 wt.% and 28 wt.% PVDF solutions have better integrity and flexibility than that from 18 wt.% PVDF solution. Figures 1(g)–1(i) show the SEM images of the three electrospun PVDF webs. Three different microstructures (namely,  microparticles, combined microparticles and nanofibers, and nanofibers) could be observed which were electrospun from the PVDF solutions with the concentrations of 18 wt.%, 23 wt.%, and 28 wt.%, respectively. The microparticles with the diameter in several micrometers were obtained via electrospinning from the 18 wt.% PVDF solution, while the nanofibers with the diameter in several hundred nanometers were obtained from the 28 wt.% PVDF solution. For the 23 wt.% PVDF solution both the microparticles and the nanofibers could be observed in the electrospun PVDF web.Morphology and microstructure of three electrospun PVDF webs (a, d, and g) microparticles electrospun from 18 wt.% PVDF; (b, e, and h) combined microparticles and nanofibers electrospun from 23 wt.% PVDF; (c, f, and i) nanofibers electrospun from 28 wt.% PVDF.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)It has been well acknowledged that the microstructures of the electrospun PVDF web are relevant to the viscosity of the PVDF solution. As the viscosity of PVDF solution was increased from 18 wt.% to 23 wt.%, the proportion of nanofiber in webs was increased due to the increased spinnability. Table1 lists physical properties of the three electrospun PVDF webs. It can be observed that the PVDF nanofibers electrospun from 28 wt.% solution had the lowest density of 0.202 g·cm−3 and the lowest thermal conductivity of 0.037 W·m−1·K−1, compared to the microparticles and the combined microparticles and nanofibers electrospun from 23 wt.% and 18 wt.%, respectively.Table 1
Properties of electrospun PVDF webs from different concentrations.
Concentration of PVDF solution (wt.%)
Properties of electrospun PVDF webs
Microstructures
Density (g·cm−3)
Thermal conductivity (W·m−1·K−1)
18
Microparticle
0.277
0.048
23
Microparticle/nanofiber
0.235
0.041
29
Nanofiber
0.202
0.037


### 3.2. Morphologies of SiO2 Aerogel Composites Reinforced Electrospun PVDF Webs

Figure2 shows optical and SEM image of the SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with the three electrospun PVDF webs with different microstructures. The SiO2 aerogel composites were cut as the specimen in circles with the diameter about 12 cm. It can be observed that the SiO2 aerogel composite specimens reinforced with the electrospun PVDF nanofibers and with combined PVDF microparticles and nanofibers showed intact integrity with a large size of diameter of 12 cm, which is significantly bigger than that in the previous literature [21]. From Figures 2(e) and 2(f) the SiO2 aerogel composite specimens reinforced with the electrospun PVDF nanofibers and with combined PVDF microparticles and nanofibers showed good flexibility even if they were bending into a circle. Therefore, the intact and flexible SiO2 aerogel composite specimens reinforced with the electrospun PVDF nanofibers and with combined PVDF microparticles and nanofibers have been firstly synthesized in this study. As a comparison, the SiO2 aerogel composite specimen reinforced with electrospun PVDF microparticles (Figure 2(a)) was fragile and readily turned into pieces while being bended. As the external bend force was exerted on the specimens, the specimen reinforced with microparticle was easily broken.Morphology and flexibility of SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs: (a, d, and g) microparticles; (b, e, and h) microparticles/nanofibers; (c, f, and i) nanofibers.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)The description of the morphologies of the aerogel composites reinforced with the three microstructured PVDF webs is shown in Table2. The intact morphology of the aerogel composites reinforced with PVDF nanofibers and the fragile morphology of that reinforced with PVDF microparticles imply that the electrospun PVDF nanofibers effectively improved the strength and the flexibility of the aerogels. It is because the electrospun PVDF nanofibers absorb the destructive energy and keep the integration of aerogel composite specimens. The second reason is that the diameter of the PVDF nanofibers is around 20 ~ 200 nm which is much closer to the size of holes and particles of the SiO2 aerogels. Moreover, as the electrospun PVDF nanofibers were added in the SiO2 aerogels, the SiO2 aerogels were separated into large quantity of small areas as shown in Figure 2(i). For the aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF nanofibers the induced tension difference between the interfaces of the nanofibers and the aerogel was reduced and the defects being bended were correspondingly decreased. As a result, the aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF nanofibers exhibited more perfect flexibility than the pure SiO2 aerogel and the SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF microparticles.Table 2
Properties of SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs.
Concentration of PVDF solution (wt.%)
SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced wih electrospun PVDF web
Integrity
Flexibility
Density (g·cm−3)
18
Crack
Fragile
0.277
23
Intact
Flexible
0.235
29
Intact
Flexible
0.202Figure3 shows the contact angle of the pure aerogel and the aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs. It can be observed that the contact angle of the pure aerogel is 139.0°. The contact angle of the aerogel composites was slightly reduced to 128.5°–134.1° as the electrospun PVDF webs were added. It may be because the added electrospun PVDF microparticles or nanofibers increase the surface roughness of the aerogels. The SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF microparticles were still perfectly hydrophobic to water so that the aerogel composites could keep perfect thermal insulations even in moist environment.Contact angle of aerogel and aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs: (a) pure aerogel; (b) aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF microparticles; (c) aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF microparticles nanofibers; (d) aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF microparticles nanofibers.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.3. Thermal Properties of SiO2 Aerogel Composites Reinforced with Electrospun PVDF Webs

Table3 lists the thermal conductivities of the SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with the electrospun PVDF webs with three different microstructures at room temperature. From Tables 1 and 3, it can be observed that the thermal conductivity of the electrospun PVDF nanofibrous webs was significantly decreased from 0.037 W·m−1·K−1 and 0.027 W·m−1·K−1 as the electrospun PVDF nanofibrous webs were filled with SiO2 aerogels. It is because the pores of the electrospun PVDF nanofibrous webs in the micron scale were filled with and separated by the aerogels to smaller pores in the nanometer scale. The gas thermal conductivity of the electrospun PVDF webs filled with nanoporous aerogels was significantly reduced since the size of the aerogel nanopores was even smaller than that of the molecular free path of the air in the pores. As a result the aerogel composites reinforced with the electrospun PVDF webs had lower thermal conductivity than the electrospun PVDF webs.Table 3
Thermal conductivity of aerogel composites supported by electrospun PVDF.
Microstructure type of electrospun PVDF
Thermal conductivity of aerogel composites (W·m−1· K−1)
Microparticle
0.039
Microparticle/nanofiber
0.032
Nanofiber
0.027
Without PVDF (pure aerogel)
0.024The aerogel composites reinforced with the electrospun PVDF nanofibers yielded the lowest thermal conductivity of 0.027 W·m−1·K−1 in all the three aerogel composites. The composite aerogel reinforced with the PVDF microparticles had the highest thermal conductivity of 0.039 W·m−1·K−1, and the composite with combined PVDF microparticles and nanofibers had a moderate thermal conductivity of 0.032 W·m−1·K−1. It is because the electrospun nanofibers had smaller diameters and greater specific surface area which is advantageous to shield the heat radiation and reduce the effective thermal conductivity.Figure4 shows the thermal gravimetric analysis of the pure SiO2 aerogels and the SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with the electrospun PVDF webs. It can be observed that the SiO2 aerogel composites have higher thermal stability below 475°C but lower thermal stability above 475°C than the pure SiO2 aerogels. The pure aerogel showed approximately around 10% weight loss in the temperature range of 350 ~ 475°C, which is derived from the degeneration of Si–O–C2H5 group. The aerogel composites reinforced with the electrospun PVDF webs showed significant weight loss in the temperature range of 450 ~ 510°C owing to the degeneration of PVDF. The weight loss of the three aerogel composites reinforced by nanofibers, combined microparticles/nanofibers, and microparticles was 60%, 44%, and 34% at 510°C, respectively. Therefore, the aerogel composites reinforced by PVDF nanofibers showed better stability than that reinforced by PVDF microparticles. However, it should be noted that the PVDF materials including three electrospun PVDF webs may melt at 172°C although no noticeable weight loss exists. Therefore, the SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF are suitable for the application in thermal insulation below 172°C.Figure 4
Thermal gravimetric analysis of pure aerogel and aerogel composites.


### 3.4. Mechanical Properties of SiO2 Aerogel Composites Reinforced with Electrospun PVDF Webs

Table4 demonstrates the mechanical properties of the aerogel composites reinforced with different electrospun PVDF webs. It can be observed that the composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF nanofibers had the highest tensile strength of 1.03 MPa. The tensile strength of the composites reinforced with combined PVDF microparticles and nanofibers was 0.51 MPa which was significantly less than that of the composites with nanofibers. Figure 5 illustrates the relation of the tensile strength and the deformation for the two aerogel composites. Compared to the combined microparticles/nanofibers reinforced composite, the nanofiber-reinforced composite exhibits higher yield strength. The nanofiber-reinforced composite experienced large deformation with a slight increase of the tensile strength while the combined microparticle/nanofiber-reinforced composite was readily broken at a small deformation. It is because the nanofibers can easily absorb the power exerted on the composite which leads an intact morphology of the aerogel composites.Table 4
Mechanical properties of aerogel composite reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs.
Microstructures of electrospun PVDF
Mechanical properties of aerogel composite reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs
Tensile strength (MPa)
Compressive strength (MPa)
Bending strength (MPa)
Microparticles
—
2.74
0.12
Microparticles/nanofibers
0.51
4.56
0.79
Nanofibers
1.03
5.23
1.1
Without PVDF (pure aerogel)
—
0.75
—Figure 5
Stretching stress-deformation curves of aerogel composite.Table4 also shows that the aerogel composite reinforced with electrospun PVDF nanofiber had the compressive strength of 5.23 MPa, which is significantly higher than that reinforced with PVDF microparticle (2.74 MPa) and noticeably higher than that with the combined PVDF microparticle/nanofiber (4.56 MPa). As a comparison, the compressive strength of the pure SiO2 aerogels was 4.56 MPa. It can be deduced that the electrospun PVDF nanofibers significantly improved the compressive strength of the aerogels. Moreover, the electrospun PVDF nanofibers significantly improved the bending strength of the aerogel composites up to 1.10 MPa compared to 0.12 MPa for the aerogel composites reinforced with PVDF microparticles. Therefore, the compressive strength and the flexibility of the SiO2 aerogels could be significantly improved by using the electrospun PVDF nanofibers as the reinforcements. It opens a promising way to improve the mechanical stability of the aerogels while keeping a low thermal conductivity via reinforcing the SiO2 aerogels by using electrospun nanofibers.


## 3.1. Microstructures of Three Electrospun PVDF Webs from Different Concentrations

Figure1 shows the morphologies and microstructures of the three electrospun PVDF webs from the different PVDF/DMF solutions with various concentration (namely, 18 wt.%, 23 wt.%, 28 wt.%). Figures 1(a)–1(f) are the optical images of the three electrospun PVDF webs cut in circles with the diameter about 12 cm. It can be observed that the two PVDF webs electrospun from the 23 wt.% and 28 wt.% PVDF solutions have better integrity and flexibility than that from 18 wt.% PVDF solution. Figures 1(g)–1(i) show the SEM images of the three electrospun PVDF webs. Three different microstructures (namely,  microparticles, combined microparticles and nanofibers, and nanofibers) could be observed which were electrospun from the PVDF solutions with the concentrations of 18 wt.%, 23 wt.%, and 28 wt.%, respectively. The microparticles with the diameter in several micrometers were obtained via electrospinning from the 18 wt.% PVDF solution, while the nanofibers with the diameter in several hundred nanometers were obtained from the 28 wt.% PVDF solution. For the 23 wt.% PVDF solution both the microparticles and the nanofibers could be observed in the electrospun PVDF web.Morphology and microstructure of three electrospun PVDF webs (a, d, and g) microparticles electrospun from 18 wt.% PVDF; (b, e, and h) combined microparticles and nanofibers electrospun from 23 wt.% PVDF; (c, f, and i) nanofibers electrospun from 28 wt.% PVDF.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)It has been well acknowledged that the microstructures of the electrospun PVDF web are relevant to the viscosity of the PVDF solution. As the viscosity of PVDF solution was increased from 18 wt.% to 23 wt.%, the proportion of nanofiber in webs was increased due to the increased spinnability. Table1 lists physical properties of the three electrospun PVDF webs. It can be observed that the PVDF nanofibers electrospun from 28 wt.% solution had the lowest density of 0.202 g·cm−3 and the lowest thermal conductivity of 0.037 W·m−1·K−1, compared to the microparticles and the combined microparticles and nanofibers electrospun from 23 wt.% and 18 wt.%, respectively.Table 1
Properties of electrospun PVDF webs from different concentrations.
Concentration of PVDF solution (wt.%)
Properties of electrospun PVDF webs
Microstructures
Density (g·cm−3)
Thermal conductivity (W·m−1·K−1)
18
Microparticle
0.277
0.048
23
Microparticle/nanofiber
0.235
0.041
29
Nanofiber
0.202
0.037


## 3.2. Morphologies of SiO2 Aerogel Composites Reinforced Electrospun PVDF Webs

Figure2 shows optical and SEM image of the SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with the three electrospun PVDF webs with different microstructures. The SiO2 aerogel composites were cut as the specimen in circles with the diameter about 12 cm. It can be observed that the SiO2 aerogel composite specimens reinforced with the electrospun PVDF nanofibers and with combined PVDF microparticles and nanofibers showed intact integrity with a large size of diameter of 12 cm, which is significantly bigger than that in the previous literature [21]. From Figures 2(e) and 2(f) the SiO2 aerogel composite specimens reinforced with the electrospun PVDF nanofibers and with combined PVDF microparticles and nanofibers showed good flexibility even if they were bending into a circle. Therefore, the intact and flexible SiO2 aerogel composite specimens reinforced with the electrospun PVDF nanofibers and with combined PVDF microparticles and nanofibers have been firstly synthesized in this study. As a comparison, the SiO2 aerogel composite specimen reinforced with electrospun PVDF microparticles (Figure 2(a)) was fragile and readily turned into pieces while being bended. As the external bend force was exerted on the specimens, the specimen reinforced with microparticle was easily broken.Morphology and flexibility of SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs: (a, d, and g) microparticles; (b, e, and h) microparticles/nanofibers; (c, f, and i) nanofibers.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)The description of the morphologies of the aerogel composites reinforced with the three microstructured PVDF webs is shown in Table2. The intact morphology of the aerogel composites reinforced with PVDF nanofibers and the fragile morphology of that reinforced with PVDF microparticles imply that the electrospun PVDF nanofibers effectively improved the strength and the flexibility of the aerogels. It is because the electrospun PVDF nanofibers absorb the destructive energy and keep the integration of aerogel composite specimens. The second reason is that the diameter of the PVDF nanofibers is around 20 ~ 200 nm which is much closer to the size of holes and particles of the SiO2 aerogels. Moreover, as the electrospun PVDF nanofibers were added in the SiO2 aerogels, the SiO2 aerogels were separated into large quantity of small areas as shown in Figure 2(i). For the aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF nanofibers the induced tension difference between the interfaces of the nanofibers and the aerogel was reduced and the defects being bended were correspondingly decreased. As a result, the aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF nanofibers exhibited more perfect flexibility than the pure SiO2 aerogel and the SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF microparticles.Table 2
Properties of SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs.
Concentration of PVDF solution (wt.%)
SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced wih electrospun PVDF web
Integrity
Flexibility
Density (g·cm−3)
18
Crack
Fragile
0.277
23
Intact
Flexible
0.235
29
Intact
Flexible
0.202Figure3 shows the contact angle of the pure aerogel and the aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs. It can be observed that the contact angle of the pure aerogel is 139.0°. The contact angle of the aerogel composites was slightly reduced to 128.5°–134.1° as the electrospun PVDF webs were added. It may be because the added electrospun PVDF microparticles or nanofibers increase the surface roughness of the aerogels. The SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF microparticles were still perfectly hydrophobic to water so that the aerogel composites could keep perfect thermal insulations even in moist environment.Contact angle of aerogel and aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs: (a) pure aerogel; (b) aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF microparticles; (c) aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF microparticles nanofibers; (d) aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF microparticles nanofibers.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.3. Thermal Properties of SiO2 Aerogel Composites Reinforced with Electrospun PVDF Webs

Table3 lists the thermal conductivities of the SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with the electrospun PVDF webs with three different microstructures at room temperature. From Tables 1 and 3, it can be observed that the thermal conductivity of the electrospun PVDF nanofibrous webs was significantly decreased from 0.037 W·m−1·K−1 and 0.027 W·m−1·K−1 as the electrospun PVDF nanofibrous webs were filled with SiO2 aerogels. It is because the pores of the electrospun PVDF nanofibrous webs in the micron scale were filled with and separated by the aerogels to smaller pores in the nanometer scale. The gas thermal conductivity of the electrospun PVDF webs filled with nanoporous aerogels was significantly reduced since the size of the aerogel nanopores was even smaller than that of the molecular free path of the air in the pores. As a result the aerogel composites reinforced with the electrospun PVDF webs had lower thermal conductivity than the electrospun PVDF webs.Table 3
Thermal conductivity of aerogel composites supported by electrospun PVDF.
Microstructure type of electrospun PVDF
Thermal conductivity of aerogel composites (W·m−1· K−1)
Microparticle
0.039
Microparticle/nanofiber
0.032
Nanofiber
0.027
Without PVDF (pure aerogel)
0.024The aerogel composites reinforced with the electrospun PVDF nanofibers yielded the lowest thermal conductivity of 0.027 W·m−1·K−1 in all the three aerogel composites. The composite aerogel reinforced with the PVDF microparticles had the highest thermal conductivity of 0.039 W·m−1·K−1, and the composite with combined PVDF microparticles and nanofibers had a moderate thermal conductivity of 0.032 W·m−1·K−1. It is because the electrospun nanofibers had smaller diameters and greater specific surface area which is advantageous to shield the heat radiation and reduce the effective thermal conductivity.Figure4 shows the thermal gravimetric analysis of the pure SiO2 aerogels and the SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with the electrospun PVDF webs. It can be observed that the SiO2 aerogel composites have higher thermal stability below 475°C but lower thermal stability above 475°C than the pure SiO2 aerogels. The pure aerogel showed approximately around 10% weight loss in the temperature range of 350 ~ 475°C, which is derived from the degeneration of Si–O–C2H5 group. The aerogel composites reinforced with the electrospun PVDF webs showed significant weight loss in the temperature range of 450 ~ 510°C owing to the degeneration of PVDF. The weight loss of the three aerogel composites reinforced by nanofibers, combined microparticles/nanofibers, and microparticles was 60%, 44%, and 34% at 510°C, respectively. Therefore, the aerogel composites reinforced by PVDF nanofibers showed better stability than that reinforced by PVDF microparticles. However, it should be noted that the PVDF materials including three electrospun PVDF webs may melt at 172°C although no noticeable weight loss exists. Therefore, the SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF are suitable for the application in thermal insulation below 172°C.Figure 4
Thermal gravimetric analysis of pure aerogel and aerogel composites.


## 3.4. Mechanical Properties of SiO2 Aerogel Composites Reinforced with Electrospun PVDF Webs

Table4 demonstrates the mechanical properties of the aerogel composites reinforced with different electrospun PVDF webs. It can be observed that the composites reinforced with electrospun PVDF nanofibers had the highest tensile strength of 1.03 MPa. The tensile strength of the composites reinforced with combined PVDF microparticles and nanofibers was 0.51 MPa which was significantly less than that of the composites with nanofibers. Figure 5 illustrates the relation of the tensile strength and the deformation for the two aerogel composites. Compared to the combined microparticles/nanofibers reinforced composite, the nanofiber-reinforced composite exhibits higher yield strength. The nanofiber-reinforced composite experienced large deformation with a slight increase of the tensile strength while the combined microparticle/nanofiber-reinforced composite was readily broken at a small deformation. It is because the nanofibers can easily absorb the power exerted on the composite which leads an intact morphology of the aerogel composites.Table 4
Mechanical properties of aerogel composite reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs.
Microstructures of electrospun PVDF
Mechanical properties of aerogel composite reinforced with electrospun PVDF webs
Tensile strength (MPa)
Compressive strength (MPa)
Bending strength (MPa)
Microparticles
—
2.74
0.12
Microparticles/nanofibers
0.51
4.56
0.79
Nanofibers
1.03
5.23
1.1
Without PVDF (pure aerogel)
—
0.75
—Figure 5
Stretching stress-deformation curves of aerogel composite.Table4 also shows that the aerogel composite reinforced with electrospun PVDF nanofiber had the compressive strength of 5.23 MPa, which is significantly higher than that reinforced with PVDF microparticle (2.74 MPa) and noticeably higher than that with the combined PVDF microparticle/nanofiber (4.56 MPa). As a comparison, the compressive strength of the pure SiO2 aerogels was 4.56 MPa. It can be deduced that the electrospun PVDF nanofibers significantly improved the compressive strength of the aerogels. Moreover, the electrospun PVDF nanofibers significantly improved the bending strength of the aerogel composites up to 1.10 MPa compared to 0.12 MPa for the aerogel composites reinforced with PVDF microparticles. Therefore, the compressive strength and the flexibility of the SiO2 aerogels could be significantly improved by using the electrospun PVDF nanofibers as the reinforcements. It opens a promising way to improve the mechanical stability of the aerogels while keeping a low thermal conductivity via reinforcing the SiO2 aerogels by using electrospun nanofibers.


## 4. Conclusions

Flexible aerogel composites, with a size of 12 cm diameter and a low thermal conductivity up to 0.027 W·m−1·K−1, were successfully synthesized via electrospinning and sol-gel processing. Three SiO2 aerogel composites reinforced with different electrospun PVDF microstructures (e.g., microparticles, nanofibers, combined microparticles, and nanofibers) were obtained and the effects of the electrospun PVDF microstructures on the thermal and mechanical properties of the aerogel composites were evaluated. The results show that the aerogel composite reinforced with the electrospun PVDF nanofibers had the lowest thermal conductivity and the greatest mechanical strength. The electrospun PVDF nanofiber supported SiO2 aerogel composites that had a low thermal conductivity of 0.027 W·m−1·K−1 which was slightly higher than the pure aerogel. However, the compressive strength and the flexibility of the aerogel composites were significantly improved via the reinforcement of the electrospun PVDF fibers. It opens a controllable way to improve and engineer the mechanical properties of the aerogel composites with low thermal conductivity via reinforcing the aerogels by using electrospun nanofibers.



---

*Source: 375093-2013-06-02.xml*