# Performance Assessment of Sintered Metal Fiber Filters in Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit

Authors: Liang Yang; Zhongli Ji; Qiaoqi Xu; Hao Li
Journal: International Journal of Chemical Engineering
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

A long-term test was performed in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) hot gas filtration facility using sintered metal candle filters. The operating temperature and pressure were maximum 55°C and 0.28 MPa, respectively. Specific particle sampling systems were used to measure the particle size and concentration directly at high temperature. The range of inlet particle concentration is from 150 to 165 mg/Nm3. The outlet particle concentration is in the range of 0.71–2.77 mg/Nm3 in stable operation. The filtration efficiency is from 98.23% to 99.55%. The inlet volume median diameter and the outlet volume median diameter of the particle are about 1 μm and 2.2 μm, respectively. The cake thickness is calculated based on the equation of Carman-Kozeny. The effects of operating parameters including face velocity, gas cleaning pressure, pulse duration, and maximum pressure drop were investigated. The optimal operating conditions and cleaning strategies were determined. The results show that sintered metal fiber filters are suitable for industrial application due to the good performance and high efficiency observed.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Hot gas filtration from industrial processes offers various advantages in terms of improvement of process efficiency, heat recovery, and protection of plant installation. Particularly, hot gas filtration is an essential technology for pressurized fluidized bed combustion (PFBC) and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), promising coal fired generation of electricity with substantially greater thermodynamic efficiencies and reduced particulate pollutant emissions [1–4]. The filtration can protect gas turbine blades from the erosion and corrosion and improve the performance of a heat exchanger connected to a steam turbine by decreasing particles deposition.Initially, the combined cycle power generation mentioned above has driven this development, but the focus now is shifted to the chemical and process industries. Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) is a process for converting high molecular weight into light and getting high valuable hydrocarbons through contact with a powdered catalyst at appropriate process conditions [5–7]. Basically, the FCC process includes two sections. One section is used for the cracking to take place on contact with hot catalyst particles at approximately 520°C, and another section is designed for the regeneration of the catalyst at approximately 720°C, where the carbon deposit is reduced from 1-2 wt% to 0.05–0.2 wt% by burning in air which is fed into the regenerator at about 0.3 MPa. In a gas-catalytic reaction, the major purpose of hot gas filtration is to recover waste heat and reduce particle release. In addition, the hot gas filtration can protect the downstream equipment and meet environmental standards. In gas-solid reactions, the gas must be thoroughly cleaned in order to avoid turbine blade damage, and there is a strong thermal advantage for gas turbine power generation.It is highly required to develop new materials and advanced operating strategies for FCC process at high temperatures. Ceramic filter is one of the most promising hot gas filtration techniques. However, due to the limitations on design and materials, long-term operation of ceramic filters is still not very successful [8]. There are some fundamental limitations due to the intrinsic material properties, which have to be improved [9]. The unreliability of the ceramic filters in demonstration trials has hindered their application [10]. Sintered metal fiber filters have been successfully used in hot gas systems for many years [11]. They have also been used for hot gas filtration in various plants due to their characteristics of fracture toughness, high thermal shock resistance, and long service life [12].The aim of this research is to evaluate the performance of high temperature sintered metal fiber filters under a variety of operating conditions in a FCC hot gas filtration facility. The effects of operating parameters were investigated in order to determine the optimal operating conditions and cleaning strategies.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Experimental Facility

A typical layout of a FCC unit and the location of hot gas filtration facility are illustrated in Figure1. The fluidizing velocity is very high and close to the terminal velocity of the catalyst in both the reactor and regenerator bed. At this high velocity, the exhaust gas elutriates fine particles. The output of the reactor is fed to a battery of primary and secondary cyclones, connected in series, and positioned within the reactor vessel. These cyclones return the catalyst to the reactor bed.Figure 1
A typical layout of a FCC unit and the location of hot gas filtration facility.A schematic diagram of the hot gas filtration facility is illustrated in Figure2. The main operating parameters and composition of the FCC dusty gas are summarized in Table 1. More than 7000-hour continuous test was performed during the research. The major parts of the facility include the filtration unit with pulse cleaning, particle sampling system, and data acquisition system. The facility was designed for the maximum operating temperature of 800°C. By changing the thickness of insulation layer outside the filter vessel, the operating temperature can be controlled at the required temperature level.Table 1
Main operating parameters and composition of the FCC dusty gas.
Main operating parameters
FCC dusty gas flow rate
10–100 Nm3/h
Operating temperature
200–550°C
Operating pressure
0.28 MPa
Cleaning gas
Nitrogen
Gas cleaning temperature
250°C
Gas cleaning pressure
0.3–0.7 MPa
Pulse duration
120–350 ms
Maximum pressure drop
2–6 kPa
Composition of the FCC dusty gas
O
2 4.15%
CO
2 9.55%
CO 3 ppm
NO 128 ppm
NO
2 0.8 ppm
NO
X 129 ppm
SO
2 20 ppm
H
2 3 ppm
H
2
S 6.4 ppm
Dew point of FCC dusty gas
86.3°CFigure 2
Schematic diagram of the hot gas filtration facility.The filter vessel is a stainless steel cylindrical column with 360 mm diameter, 3300 mm height, and a conical base. The vessel was designed to accept three candle filters with 60 mm outer diameter and 600 mm overall length. Each filter is suspended vertically at a tube plate with 415 mm diameter and 20 mm thickness. An overall view of the filter vessel is given in Figure3. The FCC stream from regenerator can be entered into the test facility vessel from the bypass line through a 50 mm diameter pipe with its centre line approximately 0.2 m below the tube plate. A specific gas distributor has been designed for mixing dusty gas well. A diffuse plate is placed in the front of the inlet to avoid direct impact of dusty gas on the filers. A hopper is used to collect and discharge the particles accumulated at the bottom of the filter vessel.Overall view of the filter vessel.
(a)
(b)Compressed nitrogen gas in the pressure range of 0.3–0.7 MPa is used for gas cleaning. The pulse cleaning duration is controlled by three solenoid valves mounted above the filter vessel. Each solenoid valve is connected to a nozzle which is directed vertically downward into a venturi injector mounted on top of the filter. The injector can also serve as a counterweight and compresses the gasket between the filter top and tube plate. The temperature of the compressed nitrogen gas was kept at about 250°C using an electronic heater to prevent condensation during the pulse cleaning. The frequency of pulse cleaning was automatically controlled by pressure in the way that the cleaning system is activated when a predetermined pressure drop is reached. The facility was connected with a computer so that the operating parameters of the system can be logged into the computer and continuously monitored during the tests.


### 2.2. Candle Filters

The filter elements tested during this study are sintered metal fiber filters manufactured by Bekaert Corporation. The dimensions of the filter are 60 mm outer diameter, 50 mm internal diameter, and 600 mm total length with 8 mm neck for the fixation to the tube plate. The effective filtration area is 0.113 m2 for each candle filter. The porosity is about 85% and the diameters of pores are between 10 and 60 μm. The density of the filters is about 1650 kg/m3. The filters that are fabricated from AISI 430 stainless steel can resist high temperature at 1000°C.


### 2.3. Particle Sampling System

The particle sampling system consists of an off-line particle sampling system and an on-line particles sampling system. The two systems have been specifically designed with the aim of determining the particles concentration and particle size distribution (PSD) prior to and after the filtration vessel. The particle sampling system was specifically developed and can be used under the maximum temperature of 650°C.The main part of the off-line particle sampling system is a sintered metal filter tube with high efficiency of 99.9% for removing 0.3μm particles. The temperature of the particle sampling system can be controlled above 180°C by electronic heater to avoid condensation inside the sintered metal filter tube. The weight of the particles remaining in the filter tube is determined by weighing the filter tube before and after sampling. The filtration efficiencies reported below are based on the inlet gas concentrations, gas flow rate duration of sampling, and the changes in the weight of the filter tube. The on-line particle sampling system uses an intense source of white light to illuminate a nearly cubic particle sensing volume of located at the centre of the aerosol flow path. This volume is defined by a combination of apertures placed in the optical path of the illumination and the two sensing branches, which are arranged at an observation angle of 90° opposing each other [13]. The principle and more details of the on-line particles sampling system can be found in our previous research [14].


## 2.1. Experimental Facility

A typical layout of a FCC unit and the location of hot gas filtration facility are illustrated in Figure1. The fluidizing velocity is very high and close to the terminal velocity of the catalyst in both the reactor and regenerator bed. At this high velocity, the exhaust gas elutriates fine particles. The output of the reactor is fed to a battery of primary and secondary cyclones, connected in series, and positioned within the reactor vessel. These cyclones return the catalyst to the reactor bed.Figure 1
A typical layout of a FCC unit and the location of hot gas filtration facility.A schematic diagram of the hot gas filtration facility is illustrated in Figure2. The main operating parameters and composition of the FCC dusty gas are summarized in Table 1. More than 7000-hour continuous test was performed during the research. The major parts of the facility include the filtration unit with pulse cleaning, particle sampling system, and data acquisition system. The facility was designed for the maximum operating temperature of 800°C. By changing the thickness of insulation layer outside the filter vessel, the operating temperature can be controlled at the required temperature level.Table 1
Main operating parameters and composition of the FCC dusty gas.
Main operating parameters
FCC dusty gas flow rate
10–100 Nm3/h
Operating temperature
200–550°C
Operating pressure
0.28 MPa
Cleaning gas
Nitrogen
Gas cleaning temperature
250°C
Gas cleaning pressure
0.3–0.7 MPa
Pulse duration
120–350 ms
Maximum pressure drop
2–6 kPa
Composition of the FCC dusty gas
O
2 4.15%
CO
2 9.55%
CO 3 ppm
NO 128 ppm
NO
2 0.8 ppm
NO
X 129 ppm
SO
2 20 ppm
H
2 3 ppm
H
2
S 6.4 ppm
Dew point of FCC dusty gas
86.3°CFigure 2
Schematic diagram of the hot gas filtration facility.The filter vessel is a stainless steel cylindrical column with 360 mm diameter, 3300 mm height, and a conical base. The vessel was designed to accept three candle filters with 60 mm outer diameter and 600 mm overall length. Each filter is suspended vertically at a tube plate with 415 mm diameter and 20 mm thickness. An overall view of the filter vessel is given in Figure3. The FCC stream from regenerator can be entered into the test facility vessel from the bypass line through a 50 mm diameter pipe with its centre line approximately 0.2 m below the tube plate. A specific gas distributor has been designed for mixing dusty gas well. A diffuse plate is placed in the front of the inlet to avoid direct impact of dusty gas on the filers. A hopper is used to collect and discharge the particles accumulated at the bottom of the filter vessel.Overall view of the filter vessel.
(a)
(b)Compressed nitrogen gas in the pressure range of 0.3–0.7 MPa is used for gas cleaning. The pulse cleaning duration is controlled by three solenoid valves mounted above the filter vessel. Each solenoid valve is connected to a nozzle which is directed vertically downward into a venturi injector mounted on top of the filter. The injector can also serve as a counterweight and compresses the gasket between the filter top and tube plate. The temperature of the compressed nitrogen gas was kept at about 250°C using an electronic heater to prevent condensation during the pulse cleaning. The frequency of pulse cleaning was automatically controlled by pressure in the way that the cleaning system is activated when a predetermined pressure drop is reached. The facility was connected with a computer so that the operating parameters of the system can be logged into the computer and continuously monitored during the tests.


## 2.2. Candle Filters

The filter elements tested during this study are sintered metal fiber filters manufactured by Bekaert Corporation. The dimensions of the filter are 60 mm outer diameter, 50 mm internal diameter, and 600 mm total length with 8 mm neck for the fixation to the tube plate. The effective filtration area is 0.113 m2 for each candle filter. The porosity is about 85% and the diameters of pores are between 10 and 60 μm. The density of the filters is about 1650 kg/m3. The filters that are fabricated from AISI 430 stainless steel can resist high temperature at 1000°C.


## 2.3. Particle Sampling System

The particle sampling system consists of an off-line particle sampling system and an on-line particles sampling system. The two systems have been specifically designed with the aim of determining the particles concentration and particle size distribution (PSD) prior to and after the filtration vessel. The particle sampling system was specifically developed and can be used under the maximum temperature of 650°C.The main part of the off-line particle sampling system is a sintered metal filter tube with high efficiency of 99.9% for removing 0.3μm particles. The temperature of the particle sampling system can be controlled above 180°C by electronic heater to avoid condensation inside the sintered metal filter tube. The weight of the particles remaining in the filter tube is determined by weighing the filter tube before and after sampling. The filtration efficiencies reported below are based on the inlet gas concentrations, gas flow rate duration of sampling, and the changes in the weight of the filter tube. The on-line particle sampling system uses an intense source of white light to illuminate a nearly cubic particle sensing volume of located at the centre of the aerosol flow path. This volume is defined by a combination of apertures placed in the optical path of the illumination and the two sensing branches, which are arranged at an observation angle of 90° opposing each other [13]. The principle and more details of the on-line particles sampling system can be found in our previous research [14].


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Initial and Residual Pressure Drop

The initial pressure drop is defined as variation of the pressure drop across filters with the face velocity by considering clean gas through them. The influence of the temperature and face velocity on the pressure drop across the filters can be investigated during these tests.Figure4 shows the evolution of the initial pressure drop with the face velocity at five temperature levels: 305°C, 365°C, 425°C, 495°C, and 550°C, respectively. It can be observed that the pressure drop increases approximately linearly with the face velocity, as Darcy’s Law indicates. When the operating temperature increases from 305°C to 550°C, the pressure drop increases for the same face velocity values; this phenomenon is mainly due to the rise of the gas viscosity with temperature.Figure 4
Evolution of the initial pressure drop with the face velocity at five temperature levels.One of the parameters which can be used to measure the influence of the operating time is the residual pressure drop. Figure5 shows the variations of pressure drop along the operating time of filtration. The initial pressure drop is about 0.85 kPa. When the pressure drop approaches 2 kPa, the filters are cleaned by pulse cleaning and the pressure drop is reduced nearly to the initial. However, the particles collected on the filters cannot be removed completely. Some particles remain in the filters; therefore, the pressure drop is not recovered to the initial and a residual pressure drop is generated. The possible reason is that the fine particles which have been collected deeply into the filter pores are difficult to be detached. As the pulse cleaning is repeated, the residual pressure drop increases and becomes over 1.1 kPa after the operating time of 120 h. Figure 6 shows the change of residual pressure drop with the filtration time. It can be observed that the residual pressure drop increases significantly at the operating time of 0–720 h. After 720 h, the residual pressure drop keeps stable at about 1.35 kPa.Figure 5
The variations of pressure drop during operation.Figure 6
The variations of residual pressure drop during operation.


### 3.2. Catalyst Particle Properties

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe the microstructure of catalyst particles. The SEM pictures are shown in Figure7. The relative percentage of elements of the catalyst particle is measured by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrum (EDX). Figure 8 and Table 2 show the EDX measured results. The particle size distribution (PSD) in the off-line particle system is determined by a Coulter counter analyzer (Coulter Multisizer 3). The results are shown in Figure 9. The PSD results measured by the on-line particle system are given in Figure 10.Table 2
The relative percentage of elements of the catalyst particle.
Element
Wt/%
At/%
OK
36.54
52.45
AlK
23.97
20.40
SiK
28.99
23.71
MoL
02.49
00.60
CaK
01.04
00.60
BaL
02.50
00.42
FeK
04.47
01.84SEM of the catalyst particle ((a) is the outlet particle and (b) is the inlet particle).
(a)
(b)Figure 8
The image of EDX measured results.Figure 9
PSD measured by the Coulter counter analyzer.Figure 10
PSD measured by the on-line particle sampling system.It can be observed from Figure7 that the inlet particles show a good spherical shape. The inlet volume median diameter and the outlet volume median diameter of the particles measured by the off-line particle sampling system are about 1.14 μm and 2.37 μm, respectively. The inlet volume median diameter and the outlet volume median diameter of the particles measured by the on-line particle sampling system are about 0.92 μm and 2.21 μm, respectively. The results measured by off-line particle sampling system agree well with those measured by on-line particle sampling system.


### 3.3. Filtration Efficiency

A peak emission is found after each pulse cleaning during an unstable operation, and a typical emission profile is illustrated in Figure11. However, the emission phenomenon disappeared after the 100th cycle. During pulse cleaning, it is found that the outlet particle concentration increases rapidly. The outlet particle concentration changes from 16.25 mg/Nm3 to 37.55 mg/Nm3 during the pulse cleaning. This phenomenon could be caused by several mechanisms such as the decrease of filtration efficiency due to the dust cake detachment, the particle penetration through the filter media due to the pulse cleaning shock, or the direct particle penetration through the filters [15–17]. One of the reasons for this problem may be the serious gas reflux from outside to inside of filters during pulse cleaning. The reflux causes fine particles to redeposit on outer surface of the filters or even penetrate into the filters. However, due to the formation of a constant and dense residual dust cake layer on the filters surface, the emission peaks progressively decrease. This residual dust cake layer dominates the subsequent filtration and stable operation.Figure 11
Typical particles emission profile during operation.When the filters are in stable operation, the filtration efficiencies can be measured at three face velocities (1.15 m/min, 1.5 m/min, and 2.2 m/min) and three temperatures (305°C, 425°C, and 550°C). The maximum pressure drop is 2 kPa and the gas cleaning pressure is 0.6 MPa. The test results of particle concentration and filtration efficiency are listed in Table3. A significant effect of temperature on the filtration efficiency cannot be observed during these tests. The inlet particle average concentration range is from 150 to 165 mg/Nm3. The outlet particle average concentration is in the range of 0.71–2.77 mg/Nm3. Slower pressure drop building up during the filtration, which results in longer pulse cleaning intervals, was one of the reasons for the higher filtration efficiencies. The filtration efficiency decreases from 99.55% to 98.23% when the face velocity is increased from 1.15 m/min to 2.2 m/min. The decrease in the filtration efficiency is associated with an increase in the pulse cleaning frequency, which could eventually result in a thinner dust cake and poorer filtration.Table 3
Test results of particles concentration and filtration efficiency.
Face velocity/m/min
Temperature/°C
Inlet particles concentration/mg/Nm3
Outlet particles concentration/mg/Nm3
Filtration efficiency/%
1.15
305
162.65
1.24
99.23
425
155.76
1.02
99.34
550
159.43
0.71
99.55
1.5
305
158.32
1.23
99.22
425
152.45
1.13
99.26
550
161.23
1.37
99.15
2.2
305
156.54
2.77
98.23
425
163.42
2.35
98.56
550
153.25
2.02
98.68


### 3.4. Dust Cake Thickness

Since it is difficult to measure the cake thickness directly, the cake thickness is estimated from the measured increase of pressure drop across the dust cake using the well-known equation of Carman-Kozeny [18], which is applied to the laminar flow conditions (Re < 1), giving
(1)h=(ΔPcakeφ2dv2ε3)[Cμ(1-ε)2U],
where h is the dust cake thickness, ΔPcake is the pressure drop across the dust cake, φ is the particle sphericity, dv is the diameter of an ideal sphere having the same volume as the particles in the experiment, ε is the cake porosity, C is the Carman-Kozeny constant (C=180), μ is dynamic viscosity of gas at filter’s operating temperature, and U is face velocity. Particle diameter of 2.4 μm and particle sphericity of 0.87 (observed from the SEM image of Figure 7) are used for dust cake. The cake porosity was estimated from experimental investigations by Schmidt on dust cakes deposited on filter media [19]. Schmidt reported that, for limiting pressure drops of 0.5, 1, and 2 kPa, the dust cake porosity ranged from 85% at the cake surface to 68% at the filter surface. In this research, a cake porosity of 80% was used to estimate the cake thickness. Depending on the maximum pressure drop and the face velocity, the estimated cake thickness is in the range of 0.43–4.15 mm. The estimated cake thickness can be used to determine the cake mass as well as the percentage of dust attached to the filters. The cake mass can be calculated from the equation below:
(2)mcake=ρBL[π(Ri+h)2-πRi2],
where mcake is the cake mass, ρB is the bulk density of the particles, L is the effective candle filter length, and Ri is the outer radius of the clean filter.The operating temperature is 425°C, the gas cleaning pressure is 0.6 MPa, and the inlet particles concentration is approximately 160 mg/Nm3. The bulk density of the particles is approximately 730 kg/m3. The results indicate that the percentage of particles attached on filters was in the range of 65–90%. At a face velocity of 2.2 m/min, nearly 86% particles can be attached to the filters. Dust cake thicknesses estimated and pressure drop across the cake are summarized in Table 4.Table 4
Dust cake thicknesses estimated and pressure drop across the cake.
Maximum pressure drop/kPa
Face velocity/m/min
Pressure drop across cake/kPa
Estimated cake thickness/mm
Estimated cake mass/g
Dust attached to filters/%
3.5
1.15
2.06
1.75
68.74
65
1.5
1.56
1.32
54.23
72
2.2
0.37
0.43
28.69
78
4.2
1.15
2.79
3.04
97.65
68
1.5
2.28
2.37
85.22
78
2.2
1.12
1.21
60.37
81
5.0
1.15
3.52
4.15
129.05
71
1.5
3.04
3.32
110.24
82
2.2
1.83
1.43
78.56
86


### 3.5. Effect of the Operational Parameters

#### 3.5.1. Face Velocity

The pressure drop across the filters was primarily affected by the face velocity. Figures12 and 13 show the pressure drop variations as a function of time for face velocities of 1.15, 1.5, 2.2, and 2.55 m/min. The maximum pressure drop was set at 5 kPa during these tests. At a face velocity of 1.15 m/min, it took about 28 h for the pressure drop to build from the initial to the maximum pressure drop. The reasons for the extremely slow increase in the pressure drop include the high bulk density of the catalyst particles, the low inlet particle concentration, and the relatively smooth and slippery surfaces of the filters, which lead to a weak adhesion of the dust cake to the filters. Similar behaviour can be observed for the face velocity of 1.5 m/min and 2.2 m/min, and it can be observed that operation is stable when filtration velocity is from 1.15 m/min to 2.2 m/min. However, unstable operation occurs at the face velocity of 2.55 m/min. During the unstable operation illustrated in Figure 13, a rapid increase in the pressure drop across the filters can be found and the slope of initial pressure drop increases continuously, leading to an unstable operation and more frequent pulse cleaning and determining a maximum value for the face velocity that should not be overcome.Figure 12
Pressure drop variations for face velocities of 1.15 m/min and 1.5 m/min.Figure 13
Pressure drop variations for face velocities of 2.2 m/min and 2.55 m/min.


#### 3.5.2. Gas Cleaning Pressure

Four different gas cleaning pressures are tested under the same operating conditions. Figures14 and 15 present the effect of the gas cleaning pressure on the pressure drop evolution. However, it must be pointed out that an upper limit of pressure cleaning can be determined, from which the frequency of the pulse remains constant despite an increase in the cleaning pressure. The improvement of pressure drop, using a cleaning pressure higher than 0.6 MPa, was not very significant; therefore, cleaning pressure value of 0.6 MPa was selected for the tests so as to minimize the consumption of nitrogen. A lower limit of gas cleaning pressure was also determined, below which the operation was not feasible. It can be observed that the operation is not stable when gas cleaning pressure is lower than 0.45 MPa. The efficient gas cleaning pressure value depends on the operating conditions but it is normally about twice the pressure value inside the filter vessel.Figure 14
Pressure drop variations for gas cleaning pressure of 0.68 MPa, 0.6 MPa, and 0.53 MPa.Figure 15
Pressure drop variations for gas cleaning pressure of 0.45 MPa.


#### 3.5.3. Pulse Duration

Figure16 shows the results of pressure drop variations measured at different duration times of the cleaning pulse, including 180 ms, 240 ms, and 300 ms. It can be found that the long pulse duration values of 240 ms and 300 ms do not show a significant effect on the pressure drop compared with the short pulse duration of 180 ms.Figure 16
Pressure drop variations for pulse durations of 180 ms, 240 ms, and 300 ms.


#### 3.5.4. Maximum Pressure Drop

Figure17 shows the results of pressure drop variations as a function of time for three different maximum pressure drops at a face velocity of 1.5 m/min. In Figure 17, it can be seen that stable operation is possible at three values of maximum pressure drop. For maximum pressure drop values of 3.5 kPa and 4.2 kPa, both initial pressure drop remained constant and the same to each other. But for the maximum pressure drop of 2.8 kPa, the initial pressure drop is higher than those of the other two values. The reason for this phenomenon is that the lower maximum pressure drop results in a thin dust cake thickness which decreases the pulse cleaning efficiency. The frequency of the pulse cleaning decreases with increasing the level of maximum pressure drop. The pulse interval increased from 3 h to 5 h when the maximum pressure drop was increased from 3.5 kPa to 4.2 kPa. Thus, a 40% reduction of pulse cleaning interval can be achieved by the higher value of maximum pressure drop. However, serious deterioration of the filters may be expected since the operation becomes more severe at higher levels of maximum pressure drop.Figure 17
Pressure drop variations for maximum pressure drop of 2.8 kPa, 3.5 kPa, and 4.2 kPa.


## 3.1. Initial and Residual Pressure Drop

The initial pressure drop is defined as variation of the pressure drop across filters with the face velocity by considering clean gas through them. The influence of the temperature and face velocity on the pressure drop across the filters can be investigated during these tests.Figure4 shows the evolution of the initial pressure drop with the face velocity at five temperature levels: 305°C, 365°C, 425°C, 495°C, and 550°C, respectively. It can be observed that the pressure drop increases approximately linearly with the face velocity, as Darcy’s Law indicates. When the operating temperature increases from 305°C to 550°C, the pressure drop increases for the same face velocity values; this phenomenon is mainly due to the rise of the gas viscosity with temperature.Figure 4
Evolution of the initial pressure drop with the face velocity at five temperature levels.One of the parameters which can be used to measure the influence of the operating time is the residual pressure drop. Figure5 shows the variations of pressure drop along the operating time of filtration. The initial pressure drop is about 0.85 kPa. When the pressure drop approaches 2 kPa, the filters are cleaned by pulse cleaning and the pressure drop is reduced nearly to the initial. However, the particles collected on the filters cannot be removed completely. Some particles remain in the filters; therefore, the pressure drop is not recovered to the initial and a residual pressure drop is generated. The possible reason is that the fine particles which have been collected deeply into the filter pores are difficult to be detached. As the pulse cleaning is repeated, the residual pressure drop increases and becomes over 1.1 kPa after the operating time of 120 h. Figure 6 shows the change of residual pressure drop with the filtration time. It can be observed that the residual pressure drop increases significantly at the operating time of 0–720 h. After 720 h, the residual pressure drop keeps stable at about 1.35 kPa.Figure 5
The variations of pressure drop during operation.Figure 6
The variations of residual pressure drop during operation.


## 3.2. Catalyst Particle Properties

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe the microstructure of catalyst particles. The SEM pictures are shown in Figure7. The relative percentage of elements of the catalyst particle is measured by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrum (EDX). Figure 8 and Table 2 show the EDX measured results. The particle size distribution (PSD) in the off-line particle system is determined by a Coulter counter analyzer (Coulter Multisizer 3). The results are shown in Figure 9. The PSD results measured by the on-line particle system are given in Figure 10.Table 2
The relative percentage of elements of the catalyst particle.
Element
Wt/%
At/%
OK
36.54
52.45
AlK
23.97
20.40
SiK
28.99
23.71
MoL
02.49
00.60
CaK
01.04
00.60
BaL
02.50
00.42
FeK
04.47
01.84SEM of the catalyst particle ((a) is the outlet particle and (b) is the inlet particle).
(a)
(b)Figure 8
The image of EDX measured results.Figure 9
PSD measured by the Coulter counter analyzer.Figure 10
PSD measured by the on-line particle sampling system.It can be observed from Figure7 that the inlet particles show a good spherical shape. The inlet volume median diameter and the outlet volume median diameter of the particles measured by the off-line particle sampling system are about 1.14 μm and 2.37 μm, respectively. The inlet volume median diameter and the outlet volume median diameter of the particles measured by the on-line particle sampling system are about 0.92 μm and 2.21 μm, respectively. The results measured by off-line particle sampling system agree well with those measured by on-line particle sampling system.


## 3.3. Filtration Efficiency

A peak emission is found after each pulse cleaning during an unstable operation, and a typical emission profile is illustrated in Figure11. However, the emission phenomenon disappeared after the 100th cycle. During pulse cleaning, it is found that the outlet particle concentration increases rapidly. The outlet particle concentration changes from 16.25 mg/Nm3 to 37.55 mg/Nm3 during the pulse cleaning. This phenomenon could be caused by several mechanisms such as the decrease of filtration efficiency due to the dust cake detachment, the particle penetration through the filter media due to the pulse cleaning shock, or the direct particle penetration through the filters [15–17]. One of the reasons for this problem may be the serious gas reflux from outside to inside of filters during pulse cleaning. The reflux causes fine particles to redeposit on outer surface of the filters or even penetrate into the filters. However, due to the formation of a constant and dense residual dust cake layer on the filters surface, the emission peaks progressively decrease. This residual dust cake layer dominates the subsequent filtration and stable operation.Figure 11
Typical particles emission profile during operation.When the filters are in stable operation, the filtration efficiencies can be measured at three face velocities (1.15 m/min, 1.5 m/min, and 2.2 m/min) and three temperatures (305°C, 425°C, and 550°C). The maximum pressure drop is 2 kPa and the gas cleaning pressure is 0.6 MPa. The test results of particle concentration and filtration efficiency are listed in Table3. A significant effect of temperature on the filtration efficiency cannot be observed during these tests. The inlet particle average concentration range is from 150 to 165 mg/Nm3. The outlet particle average concentration is in the range of 0.71–2.77 mg/Nm3. Slower pressure drop building up during the filtration, which results in longer pulse cleaning intervals, was one of the reasons for the higher filtration efficiencies. The filtration efficiency decreases from 99.55% to 98.23% when the face velocity is increased from 1.15 m/min to 2.2 m/min. The decrease in the filtration efficiency is associated with an increase in the pulse cleaning frequency, which could eventually result in a thinner dust cake and poorer filtration.Table 3
Test results of particles concentration and filtration efficiency.
Face velocity/m/min
Temperature/°C
Inlet particles concentration/mg/Nm3
Outlet particles concentration/mg/Nm3
Filtration efficiency/%
1.15
305
162.65
1.24
99.23
425
155.76
1.02
99.34
550
159.43
0.71
99.55
1.5
305
158.32
1.23
99.22
425
152.45
1.13
99.26
550
161.23
1.37
99.15
2.2
305
156.54
2.77
98.23
425
163.42
2.35
98.56
550
153.25
2.02
98.68


## 3.4. Dust Cake Thickness

Since it is difficult to measure the cake thickness directly, the cake thickness is estimated from the measured increase of pressure drop across the dust cake using the well-known equation of Carman-Kozeny [18], which is applied to the laminar flow conditions (Re < 1), giving
(1)h=(ΔPcakeφ2dv2ε3)[Cμ(1-ε)2U],
where h is the dust cake thickness, ΔPcake is the pressure drop across the dust cake, φ is the particle sphericity, dv is the diameter of an ideal sphere having the same volume as the particles in the experiment, ε is the cake porosity, C is the Carman-Kozeny constant (C=180), μ is dynamic viscosity of gas at filter’s operating temperature, and U is face velocity. Particle diameter of 2.4 μm and particle sphericity of 0.87 (observed from the SEM image of Figure 7) are used for dust cake. The cake porosity was estimated from experimental investigations by Schmidt on dust cakes deposited on filter media [19]. Schmidt reported that, for limiting pressure drops of 0.5, 1, and 2 kPa, the dust cake porosity ranged from 85% at the cake surface to 68% at the filter surface. In this research, a cake porosity of 80% was used to estimate the cake thickness. Depending on the maximum pressure drop and the face velocity, the estimated cake thickness is in the range of 0.43–4.15 mm. The estimated cake thickness can be used to determine the cake mass as well as the percentage of dust attached to the filters. The cake mass can be calculated from the equation below:
(2)mcake=ρBL[π(Ri+h)2-πRi2],
where mcake is the cake mass, ρB is the bulk density of the particles, L is the effective candle filter length, and Ri is the outer radius of the clean filter.The operating temperature is 425°C, the gas cleaning pressure is 0.6 MPa, and the inlet particles concentration is approximately 160 mg/Nm3. The bulk density of the particles is approximately 730 kg/m3. The results indicate that the percentage of particles attached on filters was in the range of 65–90%. At a face velocity of 2.2 m/min, nearly 86% particles can be attached to the filters. Dust cake thicknesses estimated and pressure drop across the cake are summarized in Table 4.Table 4
Dust cake thicknesses estimated and pressure drop across the cake.
Maximum pressure drop/kPa
Face velocity/m/min
Pressure drop across cake/kPa
Estimated cake thickness/mm
Estimated cake mass/g
Dust attached to filters/%
3.5
1.15
2.06
1.75
68.74
65
1.5
1.56
1.32
54.23
72
2.2
0.37
0.43
28.69
78
4.2
1.15
2.79
3.04
97.65
68
1.5
2.28
2.37
85.22
78
2.2
1.12
1.21
60.37
81
5.0
1.15
3.52
4.15
129.05
71
1.5
3.04
3.32
110.24
82
2.2
1.83
1.43
78.56
86


## 3.5. Effect of the Operational Parameters

### 3.5.1. Face Velocity

The pressure drop across the filters was primarily affected by the face velocity. Figures12 and 13 show the pressure drop variations as a function of time for face velocities of 1.15, 1.5, 2.2, and 2.55 m/min. The maximum pressure drop was set at 5 kPa during these tests. At a face velocity of 1.15 m/min, it took about 28 h for the pressure drop to build from the initial to the maximum pressure drop. The reasons for the extremely slow increase in the pressure drop include the high bulk density of the catalyst particles, the low inlet particle concentration, and the relatively smooth and slippery surfaces of the filters, which lead to a weak adhesion of the dust cake to the filters. Similar behaviour can be observed for the face velocity of 1.5 m/min and 2.2 m/min, and it can be observed that operation is stable when filtration velocity is from 1.15 m/min to 2.2 m/min. However, unstable operation occurs at the face velocity of 2.55 m/min. During the unstable operation illustrated in Figure 13, a rapid increase in the pressure drop across the filters can be found and the slope of initial pressure drop increases continuously, leading to an unstable operation and more frequent pulse cleaning and determining a maximum value for the face velocity that should not be overcome.Figure 12
Pressure drop variations for face velocities of 1.15 m/min and 1.5 m/min.Figure 13
Pressure drop variations for face velocities of 2.2 m/min and 2.55 m/min.


### 3.5.2. Gas Cleaning Pressure

Four different gas cleaning pressures are tested under the same operating conditions. Figures14 and 15 present the effect of the gas cleaning pressure on the pressure drop evolution. However, it must be pointed out that an upper limit of pressure cleaning can be determined, from which the frequency of the pulse remains constant despite an increase in the cleaning pressure. The improvement of pressure drop, using a cleaning pressure higher than 0.6 MPa, was not very significant; therefore, cleaning pressure value of 0.6 MPa was selected for the tests so as to minimize the consumption of nitrogen. A lower limit of gas cleaning pressure was also determined, below which the operation was not feasible. It can be observed that the operation is not stable when gas cleaning pressure is lower than 0.45 MPa. The efficient gas cleaning pressure value depends on the operating conditions but it is normally about twice the pressure value inside the filter vessel.Figure 14
Pressure drop variations for gas cleaning pressure of 0.68 MPa, 0.6 MPa, and 0.53 MPa.Figure 15
Pressure drop variations for gas cleaning pressure of 0.45 MPa.


### 3.5.3. Pulse Duration

Figure16 shows the results of pressure drop variations measured at different duration times of the cleaning pulse, including 180 ms, 240 ms, and 300 ms. It can be found that the long pulse duration values of 240 ms and 300 ms do not show a significant effect on the pressure drop compared with the short pulse duration of 180 ms.Figure 16
Pressure drop variations for pulse durations of 180 ms, 240 ms, and 300 ms.


### 3.5.4. Maximum Pressure Drop

Figure17 shows the results of pressure drop variations as a function of time for three different maximum pressure drops at a face velocity of 1.5 m/min. In Figure 17, it can be seen that stable operation is possible at three values of maximum pressure drop. For maximum pressure drop values of 3.5 kPa and 4.2 kPa, both initial pressure drop remained constant and the same to each other. But for the maximum pressure drop of 2.8 kPa, the initial pressure drop is higher than those of the other two values. The reason for this phenomenon is that the lower maximum pressure drop results in a thin dust cake thickness which decreases the pulse cleaning efficiency. The frequency of the pulse cleaning decreases with increasing the level of maximum pressure drop. The pulse interval increased from 3 h to 5 h when the maximum pressure drop was increased from 3.5 kPa to 4.2 kPa. Thus, a 40% reduction of pulse cleaning interval can be achieved by the higher value of maximum pressure drop. However, serious deterioration of the filters may be expected since the operation becomes more severe at higher levels of maximum pressure drop.Figure 17
Pressure drop variations for maximum pressure drop of 2.8 kPa, 3.5 kPa, and 4.2 kPa.


## 3.5.1. Face Velocity

The pressure drop across the filters was primarily affected by the face velocity. Figures12 and 13 show the pressure drop variations as a function of time for face velocities of 1.15, 1.5, 2.2, and 2.55 m/min. The maximum pressure drop was set at 5 kPa during these tests. At a face velocity of 1.15 m/min, it took about 28 h for the pressure drop to build from the initial to the maximum pressure drop. The reasons for the extremely slow increase in the pressure drop include the high bulk density of the catalyst particles, the low inlet particle concentration, and the relatively smooth and slippery surfaces of the filters, which lead to a weak adhesion of the dust cake to the filters. Similar behaviour can be observed for the face velocity of 1.5 m/min and 2.2 m/min, and it can be observed that operation is stable when filtration velocity is from 1.15 m/min to 2.2 m/min. However, unstable operation occurs at the face velocity of 2.55 m/min. During the unstable operation illustrated in Figure 13, a rapid increase in the pressure drop across the filters can be found and the slope of initial pressure drop increases continuously, leading to an unstable operation and more frequent pulse cleaning and determining a maximum value for the face velocity that should not be overcome.Figure 12
Pressure drop variations for face velocities of 1.15 m/min and 1.5 m/min.Figure 13
Pressure drop variations for face velocities of 2.2 m/min and 2.55 m/min.


## 3.5.2. Gas Cleaning Pressure

Four different gas cleaning pressures are tested under the same operating conditions. Figures14 and 15 present the effect of the gas cleaning pressure on the pressure drop evolution. However, it must be pointed out that an upper limit of pressure cleaning can be determined, from which the frequency of the pulse remains constant despite an increase in the cleaning pressure. The improvement of pressure drop, using a cleaning pressure higher than 0.6 MPa, was not very significant; therefore, cleaning pressure value of 0.6 MPa was selected for the tests so as to minimize the consumption of nitrogen. A lower limit of gas cleaning pressure was also determined, below which the operation was not feasible. It can be observed that the operation is not stable when gas cleaning pressure is lower than 0.45 MPa. The efficient gas cleaning pressure value depends on the operating conditions but it is normally about twice the pressure value inside the filter vessel.Figure 14
Pressure drop variations for gas cleaning pressure of 0.68 MPa, 0.6 MPa, and 0.53 MPa.Figure 15
Pressure drop variations for gas cleaning pressure of 0.45 MPa.


## 3.5.3. Pulse Duration

Figure16 shows the results of pressure drop variations measured at different duration times of the cleaning pulse, including 180 ms, 240 ms, and 300 ms. It can be found that the long pulse duration values of 240 ms and 300 ms do not show a significant effect on the pressure drop compared with the short pulse duration of 180 ms.Figure 16
Pressure drop variations for pulse durations of 180 ms, 240 ms, and 300 ms.


## 3.5.4. Maximum Pressure Drop

Figure17 shows the results of pressure drop variations as a function of time for three different maximum pressure drops at a face velocity of 1.5 m/min. In Figure 17, it can be seen that stable operation is possible at three values of maximum pressure drop. For maximum pressure drop values of 3.5 kPa and 4.2 kPa, both initial pressure drop remained constant and the same to each other. But for the maximum pressure drop of 2.8 kPa, the initial pressure drop is higher than those of the other two values. The reason for this phenomenon is that the lower maximum pressure drop results in a thin dust cake thickness which decreases the pulse cleaning efficiency. The frequency of the pulse cleaning decreases with increasing the level of maximum pressure drop. The pulse interval increased from 3 h to 5 h when the maximum pressure drop was increased from 3.5 kPa to 4.2 kPa. Thus, a 40% reduction of pulse cleaning interval can be achieved by the higher value of maximum pressure drop. However, serious deterioration of the filters may be expected since the operation becomes more severe at higher levels of maximum pressure drop.Figure 17
Pressure drop variations for maximum pressure drop of 2.8 kPa, 3.5 kPa, and 4.2 kPa.


## 4. Conclusions

A long-term test was performed in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) hot gas filtration facility using three sintered metal candle filters under a variety of operating conditions. The effects of operating parameters including face velocity, gas cleaning pressure, pulse duration, and maximum pressure drop were investigated.Due to the rise of the gas viscosity with temperature, the pressure drop increases when the operating temperature increases at the same face velocity values. There are three reasons for the slow increase in the pressure drop, including the high bulk density of the catalyst particles, the low inlet particle concentration, and the relatively smooth and slippery surface of the filters, which leads to weak adhesion of the dust cake to the filters. The range of inlet particle concentration is from 150 to 165 mg/Nm3. The outlet particle concentration is in the range of 0.71–2.77 mg/Nm3 during the stable operation. The inlet volume median diameters and the outlet volume median diameters of the particles are about 1 μm and 2.2 μm, respectively. The filtration efficiency is more than 99% when the face velocity is kept in the range of 1.15–1.5 m/min. At a face velocity of 2.2 m/min, however, the filtration efficiency is reduced to a value lower than 99%. The cake thickness can be calculated based on the equation of Carman-Kozeny.The pressure drop across the filters is primarily affected by the face velocity. The appropriate face velocity should not exceed 2.2 m/min in this research. Excessive filtration velocity leads to an unfeasible operation. Using gas cleaning pressure higher than 0.6 MPa was not very significant, and the operation was not feasible when the gas cleaning pressure was lower than 0.45 MPa. Pulse duration does not show a significant effect on pulse cleaning performance. The frequency of the pulse cleaning decreases with the higher level of maximum pressure drop. However, serious deterioration of the filters may be caused since the operation becomes more severe under a higher maximum pressure drop. In general, the study in this paper shows that the sintered metal fiber filter is suitable for industrial application due to the good performance and high efficiency observed in the experiments. The results are very useful for the next research. The main purposes of the next research are to reduce the emissions to the atmosphere according to the progressively more stringent emission standards and to protect downstream equipment from erosion. We will discuss the long-term operation data in detail later in the next paper.



---

*Source: 371853-2014-07-16.xml*