# Numerical Simulation during Short-Shot Water-Assisted Injection Molding Based on the Overflow Cavity for Short-Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polypropylene

Authors: Zhong Yu; He-Sheng Liu; Tang-Qing Kuang; Xing-Yuan Huang; Wei Zhang; Zhong-Shi Chen; Kai Zhang
Journal: Advances in Polymer Technology
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Compared with water penetration condition of short-shot water-assisted injection molding with or without overflow cavity, it can be known from theory and common knowledge that short-shot water-assisted injection molding with overflow cavity has many advantages, such as it can save materials and energy. Then, the effects of melt short shot size, water injection delay time, melt temperature and water injection pressure on the penetration of water after penetration, and the orientation distribution of short fibers during water-assisted injection molding of the overflow cavity short-shot method were studied. It is found that the melt short shot size had the greatest influence on it, followed by water injection pressure, water injection delay time, and finally, melt temperature. With the increase of the melt short shot size, the thickness of the residual wall of the whole main cavity becomes thinner, the orientation of short fiber along the melt flow direction becomes higher, and the degree of fiber orientation changes becomes lower. In the front half of the main cavity, with the decrease of water injection pressure, the delay time of water injection, and the melt temperature, in the front part of the main cavity, the residual wall thickness becomes thinner, the fiber orientation along the melt flow direction becomes lower, and the fiber orientation changes degree becomes higher; in the latter half of the main cavity, the influence of the water penetration and the orientation distribution of short fibers along the melt flow direction are not significant.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Fluid-assisted injection molding is a new injection molding technique that uses high-pressure fluid to push molten polymer forward to form a hollow or partially hollow product. It consists of gas-assisted injection molding and water-assisted injection molding. Because the gas-assisted system was more mature than the water-assisted system, gas-assisted injection molding first entered the researcher’s field of vision. With the development of science and technology, the technology of the water-assisted system has gradually improved, and water-assisted injection molding has gradually entered the field of researchers. Compared with gas, water has the advantages of high thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity, and recyclability, so water-assisted injection molding can shorten the molding cycle, reduce the production cost, and improve the inner surface smoothness, and so on [1, 2]. Therefore, in recent years, water-assisted injection molding has been widely concerned.In water-assisted injection molding, according to whether the molten polymer is fully filled with the main cavity before high-pressure water injection, it can be divided into short-shot water-assisted injection molding and overflow water-assisted injection molding. Whether it is short-shot or overflow molding, researchers focus on the influence of process parameters on macrostructure such as the water penetration length and residual wall thickness [3]. For example, Huang and Deng [4] studied the influence of process parameters on the water penetration length and residual wall thickness of PP curved pipe products by using a single-factor method. Zhang et al. [5] and Zhang et al. [6] studied the influence of relevant process parameters on the residual wall thickness of water-assisted injection molded products. Polynkin et al. [7] simulated the influence of water injection pressure on the residual wall thickness of water-assisted injection molded circular pipe products. Pudpong et al. [8] used Moldflow to simulate the influence of process parameters on the residual wall thickness of overflow water-assisted injection molding PP products by an overflow method. Park et al. [9] found that the residual wall thickness of the workpiece decreases with the increase of polymer melt temperature and water injection pressure through experiments and theories. Tangqing et al. and Tang-Qing et al. [10, 11] studied the influence of the water pressure and water delay time on the residual wall thickness of water-assisted coinjection molding by experiment. Recently, the researchers also conducted correlation studies on the microstructure and performance control of water-assisted injection molding products by changing process parameters and physical parameters [12]. For example, Wang et al. [13] prepared polypropylene/acrylonitrile-styrene copolymer products with four mass ratios through different water injection pressure and melt temperature and studied the formation mechanism of transverse crystal. Xianhu et al. [14, 15] studied the effect of HDPE with different molecular weights on the crystal morphology of water-assisted injection molded products. Haiying et al. [16] studied the effect of process parameters on the short fiber circumferential orientation by experiments and theories. In the literature investigation, there are many researches on short-shot water-assisted injection molding without the overflow cavity. However, there are few researches on the short-shot water-assisted injection molding based on the overflow cavity.In this paper, the numerical calculation is carried out based the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with and without overflow cavity. The residual wall thickness and water penetration length were compared when the short-shot molding with and without the overflow cavity is used under the same process parameters. It is proved by common sense and theory that short injection with overflow cavity can save more materials than short injection without overflow cavity. Then, the influence of process parameters on the residual wall thickness and fiber orientation distribution degree of short fiber-reinforced PP products by short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is analyzed. At the same time, it also broadens the basic theoretical and experimental research content of short-shot water-assisted injection molding.


## 2. Numerical Research Method

The short-shot water-assisted injection molding process based on the overflow cavity, which first fills short glass fiber-reinforced polymer composite melt into the main cavity, and then injects high-pressure water into the main cavity to push the melt forward to the overflow cavity, which finally keeps pressure and cooling. Due to the intervention of high-pressure water, the whole process involves many process parameters. The melt short shot size, water injection delay time, melt temperature, and water injection pressure are the main research objects in the calculation.


## 3. Mathematical Model and Assumption

Short-shot water-assisted injection molding based on the overflow cavity involves both short fiber-reinforced polymer composites with viscoelastic melt and high-pressure water for Newtonian fluids. In order to make the calculation convergence and the calculation process conform to the actual molding conditions, the mathematical model is simplified as follows: (1) the density, heat capacity, and thermal conductivity in the fluid remain unchanged; (2) no slip between the melt and the mold wall; (3) ignoring surface tension, gravity, inertial force, and body force; and (4) not considering the phase transition enthalpy during melt crystallization. Therefore, the three-dimensional nonisothermal flow behavior governing equation is obtained as follows:Continuity equation:(1)∂ρ∂t+∇⋅ρu=0Momentum equation:(2)∂∂tρu+∇⋅ρuu+τ=−∇p+ρgEnergy equation:(3)ρCp∂T∂t+u⋅∇T=∇⋅k∇T+ηγ̇2where u is the velocity vector, T is temperature, t is time, p is pressure, τ is stress tensor, g is acceleration vector of gravity, ρ is density, η is viscosity, k is thermal conductivity, Cp is specific heat, and γ̇ is shear rate.In order to describe the rheological properties of polymer melt in the mold flow channel, one of the classical constitutive equations reflecting the short fiber-reinforced polymer composites, the White-Metzner constitutive equation, is selected:(4)τ+λ∂τ∂t+u⋅∇τ−∇uT⋅τ−τ⋅∇u=η∇u+∇uT,λT,γ̇=ηT,γ̇G,η=η01+η0γ̇/τ∗1−n,η0=D1exp‐A1T−TcA2+T−Tc,Tc=D2+D3p,A2=A~2+D3p,where T is the melt temperature, G is shear modulus, η0 is zero shear viscosity, τ∗ is the parameter of the transition region between the zero shear rate and the power law region of the viscosity curve, n is the power law index, and D1, D2,D3, A1, and A~2 are all the material constants.In fiber orientation simulation, orientation probability distribution function and orientation tensor are often used to describe fiber orientation. The orientation distribution function can describe the fiber orientation state directly, but the complexity limits its use. The orientation tensor describes the fiber orientation state in the form of the matrix of the orientation distribution function. In previous studies, the standard Folgar-Tucker orientation equation combined with the fluid dynamics model of the IRD model was a useful method to theoretically determine the orientation of isotropic fibers in the concentrated suspension, but when quantitatively compared with the relevant experimental observations, the equation showed the inaccuracy of excessive prediction. Recently, the Phelps-Tucker anisotropic rotational diffusion (ARD) model has demonstrated the ability to deal with the orientation of primary anisotropic fibers; however, ARD tensors dependent on HD tensors are generally difficult to apply. In this paper, the recently improved iARD-RPR orientation model [17] is adopted, which not only considers the interaction between fibers but also considers the rotation resistance of fibers in three-dimensional space. Its expression is as follows:
(5)Ȧ=ȦHD+ȦiARDCI,CM+ȦRPRα,ȦHD=W⋅A‐A⋅W+ξD⋅A+A⋅D‐2A4:D,where ȦiARD has two available parameters: the fiber-fiber interaction parameter CI and the fiber-matrix interaction parameter CM; ȦRPR has one parameter α, which is meant to slow down the response rate of the fiber orientation.In this paper, the material selected was a short fiber-reinforced polypropylene (SGFPP) with a mass content of 10% short fibers, which was produced by LyondellBasell Industries. According to the equations mentioned above, the physical parameters involved are shown in Table1.Table 1
Characteristics of polypropylene composites (10% by weight of short fibers).
Thermal conductivity
k=0.1776W/m.K
Specific heat capacity
CP=2700J/kg.K
White-Metzner constitutive equation parameters
n=0.20426, τ∗=33086.7Pa, D1=4.58E+20Pa⋅s, D2=263.15K, D3=0K/Pa, A1=40.388, A~2=51.6K, and G=2.1E+05Pa
Fiber orientation model iARD-PRP parameters
CI=0.005, CM=0, ansd α=0.7


### 3.1. Melt front tracking

A volume percent function is introduced to describe the melt front position and the evolution of fluid penetration with respect to time. Here,f=0 is defined as the fluid phase, f=1 as the plastic melt phase, whereas the melt front is located in the 0<f<1 unit. The increase in the volume percent fraction from the kinematics process is governed by the following advection equation:
(6)∂f∂t+∇⋅uf=0,where f is the volume percent fraction; u is the velocity vector.In this paper, based on the White-Metzner constitutive equation describing the short fiber-reinforced polymer composite and the short fiber orientation model iRAD-PRP, a mathematical model was constructed based on three major equations of fluid dynamics. Using the finite volume method and the melt front tracking method, three fluid equations, constitutive equations, and fiber orientation models were calculated based on the given process parameters and physical parameters.


## 3.1. Melt front tracking

A volume percent function is introduced to describe the melt front position and the evolution of fluid penetration with respect to time. Here,f=0 is defined as the fluid phase, f=1 as the plastic melt phase, whereas the melt front is located in the 0<f<1 unit. The increase in the volume percent fraction from the kinematics process is governed by the following advection equation:
(6)∂f∂t+∇⋅uf=0,where f is the volume percent fraction; u is the velocity vector.In this paper, based on the White-Metzner constitutive equation describing the short fiber-reinforced polymer composite and the short fiber orientation model iRAD-PRP, a mathematical model was constructed based on three major equations of fluid dynamics. Using the finite volume method and the melt front tracking method, three fluid equations, constitutive equations, and fiber orientation models were calculated based on the given process parameters and physical parameters.


## 4. Model Structure and Process Parameters

Short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is different from the general short-shot water-assisted injection molding by adding an overflow cavity. Its model consists mainly of the main cavity, overflow cavity, melt injection nozzle, and water injection nozzle. Its main structural parameters: the main cavity size isΦ16∗245, the overflow cavity diameter is Φ10. Compared with short-shot water-assisted injection molding based on the overflow cavity, there is no overflow cavity for the short-shot water-assisted injection molding without the overflow cavity. The schematic diagrams and physical figure are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively.Figure 1
The schematic diagrams.Figure 2
The physical figure.In this paper, firstly, the residual wall thickness and water penetration length were compared when the short-shot molding without the overflow cavity and the short-shot molding with the overflow cavity are used under the same process parameters. The following, the influence of process parameters on the residual wall thickness and fiber orientation distribution degree of short fiber-reinforced PP products by short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity, are further analyzed; the process parameters studied are shown in Table2.Table 2
The process parameters.
Melt short shot size (%)
Water injection delay time(s)
Melt temperature (°C)
Water injection pressure(MPa)
70
0
210
4
75
1
230
6
80
3
250
8
85
5
270
10
Note: The numerical bolding in the table is the basic parameter to investigate the melt short shot size, water injection delay time, melt temperature, and water injection pressure.


## 5. Materials and Experiments

### 5.1. Materials

In the experiments, short glass fiber-reinforced polyethylene (SGFPP, Grade Hostacom SB224-1, LyondellBasell Industries, Germany) was used. The materials were 10% reinforced by the mass content of short glass fiber. Its flow index MFI230,2.16=7g/10min, and its density was 0.9 g/cc.


### 5.2. Experiments

The experimental platform is mainly composed of injection molding machine, water injection system, and mold, as shown in Figure3. The experiment adopts a single-factor experiment, in which the injection molding machine mainly implements melt short shot size and melt temperature, and the water injection system mainly implements injection water injection delay time and water injection pressure.Figure 3
The experimental platform.


### 5.3. Theoretical and Experimental Data Processing

#### 5.3.1. Residual Wall Thickness and Its Percentage

The residual wall thickness of the product refers to the radial thickness of the melt after filling, and the percentage of residual wall thickness refers to the ratio of the residual wall thickness to the main cavity diameter. The larger the percentage of the residual wall thickness, the larger the cross-section of melt penetrated by water, and vice versa.


#### 5.3.2. Fiber Orientation

Fiber orientation refers to the orientation value of the fiber along the melt flow direction. The more the orientation value fluctuates or the more chaotic the orientation value is, the greater the orientation change degree is. In this paper, the main cavity is divided into three sections on average. At the end of each section, a 5 mm ring is cut out (Figure4) and then placed in a liquid nitrogen container for half an hour cooling and brittle fracture treatment. Finally, the brittle section is sliced and placed in a carrier platform with conductive adhesive for gold spraying (Figure 5) and scanning electron microscope (Figure 6).Figure 4
Schematic diagram of SEM sample sampling position and detection area.Figure 5
Experimental test sample.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
SEM observation.


## 5.1. Materials

In the experiments, short glass fiber-reinforced polyethylene (SGFPP, Grade Hostacom SB224-1, LyondellBasell Industries, Germany) was used. The materials were 10% reinforced by the mass content of short glass fiber. Its flow index MFI230,2.16=7g/10min, and its density was 0.9 g/cc.


## 5.2. Experiments

The experimental platform is mainly composed of injection molding machine, water injection system, and mold, as shown in Figure3. The experiment adopts a single-factor experiment, in which the injection molding machine mainly implements melt short shot size and melt temperature, and the water injection system mainly implements injection water injection delay time and water injection pressure.Figure 3
The experimental platform.


## 5.3. Theoretical and Experimental Data Processing

### 5.3.1. Residual Wall Thickness and Its Percentage

The residual wall thickness of the product refers to the radial thickness of the melt after filling, and the percentage of residual wall thickness refers to the ratio of the residual wall thickness to the main cavity diameter. The larger the percentage of the residual wall thickness, the larger the cross-section of melt penetrated by water, and vice versa.


### 5.3.2. Fiber Orientation

Fiber orientation refers to the orientation value of the fiber along the melt flow direction. The more the orientation value fluctuates or the more chaotic the orientation value is, the greater the orientation change degree is. In this paper, the main cavity is divided into three sections on average. At the end of each section, a 5 mm ring is cut out (Figure4) and then placed in a liquid nitrogen container for half an hour cooling and brittle fracture treatment. Finally, the brittle section is sliced and placed in a carrier platform with conductive adhesive for gold spraying (Figure 5) and scanning electron microscope (Figure 6).Figure 4
Schematic diagram of SEM sample sampling position and detection area.Figure 5
Experimental test sample.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
SEM observation.


## 5.3.1. Residual Wall Thickness and Its Percentage

The residual wall thickness of the product refers to the radial thickness of the melt after filling, and the percentage of residual wall thickness refers to the ratio of the residual wall thickness to the main cavity diameter. The larger the percentage of the residual wall thickness, the larger the cross-section of melt penetrated by water, and vice versa.


## 5.3.2. Fiber Orientation

Fiber orientation refers to the orientation value of the fiber along the melt flow direction. The more the orientation value fluctuates or the more chaotic the orientation value is, the greater the orientation change degree is. In this paper, the main cavity is divided into three sections on average. At the end of each section, a 5 mm ring is cut out (Figure4) and then placed in a liquid nitrogen container for half an hour cooling and brittle fracture treatment. Finally, the brittle section is sliced and placed in a carrier platform with conductive adhesive for gold spraying (Figure 5) and scanning electron microscope (Figure 6).Figure 4
Schematic diagram of SEM sample sampling position and detection area.Figure 5
Experimental test sample.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
SEM observation.


## 6. Results and Analysis

Figure7 shows the water penetration of the two water-assisted injection moldings along the melt flow direction at the melt short shot size of 75%, the water injection delay time of 1 s, the melt temperature of 230° C, and the water injection pressure of 8 MPa. It can be seen from the figure that the main cavity is completely penetrated by water during short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity, while the main cavity is penetrated by water more than half during short-shot water-assisted injection molding without the overflow cavity.Figure 7
Water penetration of two short-shot water-assisted injection molding at the melt injection volume of 75%.The reason is that in the short-shot water-assisted injection molding without the overflow cavity, the volume of the main cavity corresponds to the sum of the volume of the melt penetrated by water and the volume of the residual wall thickness, and the more the melt is penetrated by water, the smaller the residual wall thickness. On the contrary, the less the melt is penetrated by water, the larger the residual wall thickness. In short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity, although the volume of the main cavity is equal to the sum of the volume of the melt penetrated by water and the volume of the residual wall thickness, the overflow cavity is connected with the main cavity causes the excess melt to gradually flow into the overflow cavity during the process of the melt penetrated by water. Under the same process parameters, compared with the short-shot water-assisted injection molding without the overflow cavity, when the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is used, the melt is longer penetrated by water and the residual wall thickness is thinner; the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity saves more material or energy, such as melt short shot size.Therefore, both in theory and in common sense, the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is more advantageous than that without the overflow cavity. Subsequently, the influence of different process parameters on water penetration and fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction will be analyzed during the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity.


### 6.1. Water Penetration

Figure8 shows the residual wall thickness percentage along the melt flow direction when the melt short shot size of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 70%, 75%, 80%, and 85%, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. As can be seen from the figure, as the melt short shot size increases, residual wall thickness percentage increases, and residual wall thickness is thickening. At a distance from the water injection port to the end of the main cavity, as the melt short shot size is smaller, the residual wall thickness percentage is flatter and smaller, and the residual wall thickness is more uniform. The reason is that as the melt short shot size increases, the resistance of water penetrates increases, and the longer the cooling time of the melt that is not penetrated by the water at the low temperature mold wall, the greater the effect.Figure 8
Effect of melt short shot size on water penetration.Figure9 shows that the residual wall thickness percentage along the melt flow direction when the injection delay time of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 0 s, 1 s, 3 s, and 5 s, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. It can be seen from the figure that with the longer of water injection delay time, residual wall thickness percentage increases in the front half of the main cavity, and residual wall thickness percentage in the latter half is basically the same. The reason is that before the high-pressure water is injected, the high-temperature melt mainly stays in the front half of the main cavity, and as the cooling time of low-temperature mold wall becomes longer, the thickness of solidified layer becomes larger. After the high-pressure water is injected, the melt of the front half of the main cavity is pushed into the overflow cavity through the latter half of the main cavity. In this process, the residual wall thickness of the latter half of the main cavity is determined by the mold surface and the water cooling period. This period is very short, resulting in substantially the same percentage of residual wall thickness in the latter half. In addition, it can be seen that when the water injection time is 0 s, residual wall thickness percentage is the flattest along the melt flow direction.Figure 9
Effect of water injection delay time on water penetration.Figure10 shows that the residual wall thickness percentage along the melt flow direction when the melt temperature of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 210°C, 230°C, 250°C, and 270°C, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. According to the figure, as the melt temperature increases, residual wall thickness percentage decreases relatively, but not significant. The reason is that as the melt temperature increases, the melt viscosity decreases, the resistance of high-pressure water pushing melt decreases, and residual wall thickness percentage also decreases.Figure 10
Effect of melt temperature on water penetration.Figure11 shows that the residual wall thickness percentage along the melt flow direction when the water injection pressure of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 4 MPa, 6 MPa, 8 MPa, and 10 MPa, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. It can be seen from the figure that as the water injection pressure increases, residual wall thickness percentage decreases, and the distribution of residual wall thickness is flatter along the melt flow direction, and the percentage of residual wall thickness in the latter half of the main cavity is almost the same. The reason is that as the water injection pressure increases, the water diameter becomes large when the high-pressure water enters from the water injection nozzle, thereby pushing the water penetration cross-section to be larger. In the latter half of the main cavity, the melt here is driven by the high-pressure water in the first half of the main cavity and continues to be pushed into the overflow cavity by the high-pressure water. During this process, the melt is pushed by the high-pressure water for a short time, resulting in a shorter time for the melt to be cooled by water and mold wall.Figure 11
Effect of water injection pressure on water penetration.


### 6.2. Degree of Fiber Orientation Distribution

Figure12 shows that the fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction when the melt short shot size of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 70%, 75%, 80%, and 85%, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. As can be seen from the figure, as the melt short shot size increases, the fiber orientation is lower and the degree of change in the fiber orientation distribution is higher along the melt flow direction. According to the characteristics of short fiber-reinforced polymer water-assisted injection molding products, the products are divided into a wall layer, core layer, and water channel layer along the direction of thickness. The fiber at the wall layer and water channel layer has a high orientation along the melt flow direction and a low degree of change, while the fiber at the core layer has a random orientation along the melt flow direction and a high degree of change. The reasons are as follows: as can be seen from Figure 8, as the melt short shot size increases, residual wall thickness percentage increases, and residual wall thickness is thickening. The thickening of residual wall thickness means that the smaller the percentage of wall thickness of the wall layer and water channel layer, the higher the percentage of core layer, resulting in the lower orientation and higher degree of change of fiber along the melt flow direction.Figure 12
Effect of melt short shot size on fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction.
(a)
Numerical analysis of water injection delay time on fiber orientation
(b)
SEM image of fiber orientation, the left side of each picture is the mold wall, the right side is the channel, and the three pictures of each process parameter are the near water end, the middle end, and the far water end, respectively, from left to right (the result of 0 s the same as the result of 1 s)Figure13 shows that the fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction when the water injection delay time of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 0 s, 1 s, 3 s, and 5 s, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. As can be seen from the figure, in the front half of the main cavity, as the water injection delay time is prolonged, the fiber orientation is lower and the degree of the fiber orientation change is higher along the melt flow direction. In the latter half of the main cavity, the change in the water injection delay time has little effect on it. The reasons are as follows: as can be seen from Figure 9, with the longer of water injection delay time, residual wall thickness percentage increases in the front half of the main cavity, and residual wall thickness percentage in the latter half is basically the same. With the extension of water injection delay time, the percentage of residual wall thickness in the front half of the main cavity increases and the residual wall thickness thickens, resulting in the percentage of core layer in the wall thickness increases and the lower orientation and higher change degree of the fibers in the front half of the main cavity along the melt flow direction.Figure 13
Effect of water injection delay time on fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction.
(a)
numerical analysis of water injection delay time on fiber orientation
(b)
SEM image of fiber orientation, the left side of each picture is the mold wall, the right side is the channel, and the three pictures of each process parameter are the near water end, the middle end and the far water end respectively from left to right (the result of 0 s the same as the result of 1 s)Figure14 shows that the fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction when the melt temperature of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 210°C, 230°C, 250°C, and 270°C, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. As can be seen from the figure, in the front half of the main cavity, as the melt temperature increases, the fiber orientation is higher and the degree of change in the fiber orientation distribution is lower along the melt flow direction. In the latter half of the main cavity, the change in the melt temperature has little effect on it. The reasons are as follows: as can be seen from Figure 10, as the melt temperature increases, the residual wall thickness percentage decreases in the front half of the main cavity, and the residual wall thickness percentage in the latter half is basically the same, but not significant in the main cavity. With the increase of melt temperature, the percentage of residual wall thickness in the front half of the main cavity increases and the residual wall thickness thickens, resulting in the percentage of core layer in the wall thickness increases and the lower orientation and higher change degree of the fibers in the front half of the main cavity along the melt flow direction.Figure 14
Effect of melt temperature on fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction.
(a)
Numerical analysis of melt temperature on fiber orientation
(b)
SEM image of fiber orientation, the left side of each picture is the mold wall, the right side is the channel, and the three pictures of each process parameter are the near water end, the middle end and the far water end, respectively, from left to rightFigure15 shows that the fiber orientation distribution along the flow direction when the water injection pressure of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 4 MPa, 6 MPa, 8 MPa, and 10 MPa, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. As can be seen from the figure, in the front half of the main cavity, as the water injection pressure increases, the fiber orientation is higher and the degree of change in the fiber orientation distribution is lower along the melt flow direction. In the latter half of the main cavity, the change in the melt temperature has little effect on it. The reasons are as follows: as can be seen from Figure 11, as the water injection pressure increases, residual wall thickness percentage decreases in the front half of the main cavity, and residual wall thickness percentage in the latter half is basically the same. With the increase of water injection pressure, the percentage of residual wall thickness in the front half of the main cavity decreases and the residual wall thickness thins, resulting in the percentage of core layer in the wall thickness decreases and the higher orientation and lower change degree of the fibers in the front half of the main cavity along the melt flow direction.Figure 15
Effect of water injection pressure on fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction.
(a)
Numerical analysis of water injection pressure on fiber orientation
(b)
SEM image of fiber orientation, the left side of each picture is the mold wall, the right side is the channel, and the three pictures of each process parameter are the near water end, the middle end and the far water end, respectively, from left to right


## 6.1. Water Penetration

Figure8 shows the residual wall thickness percentage along the melt flow direction when the melt short shot size of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 70%, 75%, 80%, and 85%, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. As can be seen from the figure, as the melt short shot size increases, residual wall thickness percentage increases, and residual wall thickness is thickening. At a distance from the water injection port to the end of the main cavity, as the melt short shot size is smaller, the residual wall thickness percentage is flatter and smaller, and the residual wall thickness is more uniform. The reason is that as the melt short shot size increases, the resistance of water penetrates increases, and the longer the cooling time of the melt that is not penetrated by the water at the low temperature mold wall, the greater the effect.Figure 8
Effect of melt short shot size on water penetration.Figure9 shows that the residual wall thickness percentage along the melt flow direction when the injection delay time of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 0 s, 1 s, 3 s, and 5 s, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. It can be seen from the figure that with the longer of water injection delay time, residual wall thickness percentage increases in the front half of the main cavity, and residual wall thickness percentage in the latter half is basically the same. The reason is that before the high-pressure water is injected, the high-temperature melt mainly stays in the front half of the main cavity, and as the cooling time of low-temperature mold wall becomes longer, the thickness of solidified layer becomes larger. After the high-pressure water is injected, the melt of the front half of the main cavity is pushed into the overflow cavity through the latter half of the main cavity. In this process, the residual wall thickness of the latter half of the main cavity is determined by the mold surface and the water cooling period. This period is very short, resulting in substantially the same percentage of residual wall thickness in the latter half. In addition, it can be seen that when the water injection time is 0 s, residual wall thickness percentage is the flattest along the melt flow direction.Figure 9
Effect of water injection delay time on water penetration.Figure10 shows that the residual wall thickness percentage along the melt flow direction when the melt temperature of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 210°C, 230°C, 250°C, and 270°C, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. According to the figure, as the melt temperature increases, residual wall thickness percentage decreases relatively, but not significant. The reason is that as the melt temperature increases, the melt viscosity decreases, the resistance of high-pressure water pushing melt decreases, and residual wall thickness percentage also decreases.Figure 10
Effect of melt temperature on water penetration.Figure11 shows that the residual wall thickness percentage along the melt flow direction when the water injection pressure of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 4 MPa, 6 MPa, 8 MPa, and 10 MPa, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. It can be seen from the figure that as the water injection pressure increases, residual wall thickness percentage decreases, and the distribution of residual wall thickness is flatter along the melt flow direction, and the percentage of residual wall thickness in the latter half of the main cavity is almost the same. The reason is that as the water injection pressure increases, the water diameter becomes large when the high-pressure water enters from the water injection nozzle, thereby pushing the water penetration cross-section to be larger. In the latter half of the main cavity, the melt here is driven by the high-pressure water in the first half of the main cavity and continues to be pushed into the overflow cavity by the high-pressure water. During this process, the melt is pushed by the high-pressure water for a short time, resulting in a shorter time for the melt to be cooled by water and mold wall.Figure 11
Effect of water injection pressure on water penetration.


## 6.2. Degree of Fiber Orientation Distribution

Figure12 shows that the fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction when the melt short shot size of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 70%, 75%, 80%, and 85%, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. As can be seen from the figure, as the melt short shot size increases, the fiber orientation is lower and the degree of change in the fiber orientation distribution is higher along the melt flow direction. According to the characteristics of short fiber-reinforced polymer water-assisted injection molding products, the products are divided into a wall layer, core layer, and water channel layer along the direction of thickness. The fiber at the wall layer and water channel layer has a high orientation along the melt flow direction and a low degree of change, while the fiber at the core layer has a random orientation along the melt flow direction and a high degree of change. The reasons are as follows: as can be seen from Figure 8, as the melt short shot size increases, residual wall thickness percentage increases, and residual wall thickness is thickening. The thickening of residual wall thickness means that the smaller the percentage of wall thickness of the wall layer and water channel layer, the higher the percentage of core layer, resulting in the lower orientation and higher degree of change of fiber along the melt flow direction.Figure 12
Effect of melt short shot size on fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction.
(a)
Numerical analysis of water injection delay time on fiber orientation
(b)
SEM image of fiber orientation, the left side of each picture is the mold wall, the right side is the channel, and the three pictures of each process parameter are the near water end, the middle end, and the far water end, respectively, from left to right (the result of 0 s the same as the result of 1 s)Figure13 shows that the fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction when the water injection delay time of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 0 s, 1 s, 3 s, and 5 s, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. As can be seen from the figure, in the front half of the main cavity, as the water injection delay time is prolonged, the fiber orientation is lower and the degree of the fiber orientation change is higher along the melt flow direction. In the latter half of the main cavity, the change in the water injection delay time has little effect on it. The reasons are as follows: as can be seen from Figure 9, with the longer of water injection delay time, residual wall thickness percentage increases in the front half of the main cavity, and residual wall thickness percentage in the latter half is basically the same. With the extension of water injection delay time, the percentage of residual wall thickness in the front half of the main cavity increases and the residual wall thickness thickens, resulting in the percentage of core layer in the wall thickness increases and the lower orientation and higher change degree of the fibers in the front half of the main cavity along the melt flow direction.Figure 13
Effect of water injection delay time on fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction.
(a)
numerical analysis of water injection delay time on fiber orientation
(b)
SEM image of fiber orientation, the left side of each picture is the mold wall, the right side is the channel, and the three pictures of each process parameter are the near water end, the middle end and the far water end respectively from left to right (the result of 0 s the same as the result of 1 s)Figure14 shows that the fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction when the melt temperature of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 210°C, 230°C, 250°C, and 270°C, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. As can be seen from the figure, in the front half of the main cavity, as the melt temperature increases, the fiber orientation is higher and the degree of change in the fiber orientation distribution is lower along the melt flow direction. In the latter half of the main cavity, the change in the melt temperature has little effect on it. The reasons are as follows: as can be seen from Figure 10, as the melt temperature increases, the residual wall thickness percentage decreases in the front half of the main cavity, and the residual wall thickness percentage in the latter half is basically the same, but not significant in the main cavity. With the increase of melt temperature, the percentage of residual wall thickness in the front half of the main cavity increases and the residual wall thickness thickens, resulting in the percentage of core layer in the wall thickness increases and the lower orientation and higher change degree of the fibers in the front half of the main cavity along the melt flow direction.Figure 14
Effect of melt temperature on fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction.
(a)
Numerical analysis of melt temperature on fiber orientation
(b)
SEM image of fiber orientation, the left side of each picture is the mold wall, the right side is the channel, and the three pictures of each process parameter are the near water end, the middle end and the far water end, respectively, from left to rightFigure15 shows that the fiber orientation distribution along the flow direction when the water injection pressure of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is 4 MPa, 6 MPa, 8 MPa, and 10 MPa, respectively; other process parameters are the basic parameters. As can be seen from the figure, in the front half of the main cavity, as the water injection pressure increases, the fiber orientation is higher and the degree of change in the fiber orientation distribution is lower along the melt flow direction. In the latter half of the main cavity, the change in the melt temperature has little effect on it. The reasons are as follows: as can be seen from Figure 11, as the water injection pressure increases, residual wall thickness percentage decreases in the front half of the main cavity, and residual wall thickness percentage in the latter half is basically the same. With the increase of water injection pressure, the percentage of residual wall thickness in the front half of the main cavity decreases and the residual wall thickness thins, resulting in the percentage of core layer in the wall thickness decreases and the higher orientation and lower change degree of the fibers in the front half of the main cavity along the melt flow direction.Figure 15
Effect of water injection pressure on fiber orientation distribution along the melt flow direction.
(a)
Numerical analysis of water injection pressure on fiber orientation
(b)
SEM image of fiber orientation, the left side of each picture is the mold wall, the right side is the channel, and the three pictures of each process parameter are the near water end, the middle end and the far water end, respectively, from left to right


## 7. Conclusion

The numerical calculation is carried out by combining the viscoelastic constitutive equation White-Metzner and the fiber orientation model iARD-RPR and then verified by experiment. Firstly, the water penetration condition of the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with and without the overflow cavity is compared. From theory and common sense, the short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity is more advantageous than that without the overflow cavity. And then, during short-shot water-assisted injection molding with the overflow cavity, the effects of the melt short shot size, water injection delay time, melt temperature, and water injection pressure on the penetration of water after penetration and the orientation distribution of short fibers along the melt flow direction were analyzed.It is known that the melt short shot size has the most significant influence on the penetration condition and the orientation distribution of short fibers along the melt flow direction after water penetration, followed by the water injection pressure, the water injection delay time, and finally, the melt temperature. To a certain extent, as the melt short shot size increases, the residual wall thickness becomes larger after water penetration, and the orientation of short fibers is lower and the degree of the fiber orientation change is higher along the melt flow direction; as the water injection pressure increases, the residual wall thickness becomes thinner after water penetration, and the orientation of short fibers is higher (especially in the front half of the main cavity) and the degree of the fiber orientation change is lower along the melt flow direction; as the water injection delay time is prolonged, the residual wall thickness becomes thicker after water penetration, and the orientation of short fibers is lower and the degree of the fiber orientation change is higher along the melt flow direction in the front half of the main cavity; however, the penetration of the water and the orientation distribution of short fibers along the melt flow direction in the latter half of the main cavity have little effect; as the melt temperature increases, the residual wall thickness becomes thinner after water penetration, and the orientation of short fibers is higher and the degree of the fiber orientation change is lower along the melt flow direction in the front half of the main cavity, and the influence of the water penetration and the orientation distribution of short fibers along the melt flow direction in the latter half of the main cavity is minimal.



---

*Source: 3718670-2020-05-05.xml*