# Polymers Based on Methacrylate Bearing Coumarin Side Group: Synthesis via Free Radical Polymerization, Monomer Reactivity Ratios, Dielectric Behavior, and Thermal Stabilities

Authors: Nursel Ayaz; Feride Bezgin; Kadir Demırellı
Journal: ISRN Polymer Science
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Copolymerization and homopolymerization of 7-methacryloyloxy coumarin (MAOC) and its copolymers with benzyl methacrylate (BMA), methyl methacrylate (MMA), ethyl methacrylate (EMA), and isobuthyl methacrylate (IBMA) were performed by the free radical polymerization method (FRP) at low conversions (<15%). The resulting polymers were characterized by FTIR, 1H NMR, GPC, DSC, and TGA. The monomer reactivity ratios of MAOC and BMA were computed using Kelen-Tüdös (K-T) and Fineman-Ross (F-R) methods and were found to be r1=0.45, r2=1.29; r1=0.46; r2=1.33, respectively (r1 is monomer reactivity ratio of MAOC). Blends of poly(MAOC) and poly(BMA) obtained via FRP method were prepared by casting films from dichloromethane solution and were characterized by DTA and TGA techniques. Dielectric measurements for MAOC homopolymer and its copolymers with EMA, MMA, and IBMA were carried out by means of an impedance analyzer as a function of temperature and frequence. Dielectric properties of polymer samples prepared in a plate form were measured at room temperature over the frequency range 0.1 kHz–2 MHz and given as compared with each other.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Coumarin-containing polymers have been well studied and widely applied in many fields, such as biochemicals, electrooptical materials, organic-inorganic hybrid materials, liquid crystalline materials, and light-harvesting/energy-transferring materials [1–3]. However, most reported coumarin-containing polymers were linear polymers [4]. And the coumarin functional group was introduced as a pendent group or terminal group of the polymer chain [5–7]. The chemical modification of coumarins allows us to vary emission wavelength continuously throughout the visible spectrum [8]. Photopolymers are studied for their macromolecular properties and for the properties of the photosensitive group. Among them, polymers having photocrosslinkable functional groups, such as cinnamoyl, chalcone, thymine, or coumarin, represent an active field of research in polymer science because of their technological applications in the fields of photolithography [9], nonlinear optical materials [10], liquid crystalline materials [11], and holographic elements [12]. 7-hydroxycoumarin is a widely used structure in introducing the coumarin unit into polymer [13, 14]. These polymers are known as “light harvesting” or “antenna” polymers and commonly involve vinyl aromatic polymers with pendant chromophores capable of efficient light collection and long-range energy transfer.The copolymer composition and comonomers units distribution depend on monomer reactivity ratios. The most common mathematical model of copolymerization is based on finding the relationship between the composition of copolymers and the composition of the monomer feed in which the monomer-reactivity ratios are the parameters to be determined [15]. The calculation of the monomer-reactivity ratios requires the mathematical treatment of experimental data on the composition of copolymers and monomer in feed mixtures. The most fundamental quantities characterizing a copolymer is its composition on a molar basis, which eventually is used for the determination of the relevant monomer reactivity ratios. Spectroscopic methods, preferably 1H-NMR spectroscopy [16, 17], and elemental analysis are probably the most widely used methods for the analysis of copolymers and the determination of reactivity ratios r1 and r2.At low frequencies, thermal characteristics of dielectric constant of the composites strongly depend on both the polymer polarity and flexibility. The composites based on a nonpolar polymer matrix show little variation of their dielectric constant with temperature. On the other hand, the dielectric constant of the composites based on a polar polymer matrix strongly depends on the polymer state. At the temperatures where the polymer matrix is in its glassy state, the dielectric constant is much lower than that in the elastic state with a steep increase around the glass transition temperature [16].The objective of the present work is to investigate the polymer properties of 7-methacryloyloxy coumarin having a bulky side chain onto coumarine. In this work, two different copolymer systems were prepared. One of them is MAOC/MMA, EMA, IBMA copolymer system, the other is six MAOC-BMA copolymer system. Thus, this paper describes synthesis of polymers prepared by free radical homo- and copolymerization of BMA, MMA, EMA, IBMA with 7-methacryloyloxy coumarin iniated with AIBN, the dielectric behavior by depending upon frequence and temperature of MAOC/MMA, EMA, IBMA copolymer series, to determine monomer reactivity ratios of MAOC-BMA copolymer series, and characterization of the homo- and copolymers with FTIR,1H,13C-NMR, thermal analysis, gel permeation chromatography (GPC), and impedance analysis.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

7-hydroxycoumarin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Isobutyl methyacrylate (IBMA), methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate (EMA) (Aldrich) were distilled under vacuum before use. 2,2′-Azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN), methacryloyl chloride, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and ethanol (Fluka) were used without further purification.


### 2.2. Measurements

1H NMR spectra were obtained on a AVANCE III 400 MHz Bruker, using CDCl3 as the solvent and tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. Infrared spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum One FT-IR spectrometer. Calorimetric measurements were carried out on a Shimadzu DSC-50 thermal analyzer under N2 flow a using a heating rate of 20°C/min. Experiments were carried out on approximately 3–5 mg samples at a heating rate of 10°C min−1 under nitrogen flow conditions (10 cm3 min−1). The molecular weight and molecular weight distribution were determined using an Agilent 1100 gel permeation chromatography (GPC) system equipped with a Waters Styragel column, a refractive index detector, and a pump. The column was calibrated with polystyrene, and samples were eluted using THF. The polymer was ground with an agate mortar and pestle, and the final fine powder was pressed at four tons of pressure into disk-shaped samples with a thickness ranging from 0.94 mm to 2.22 mm and a diameter of 12 mm. The entire surface of the discs was coated with silver paste, which acts as a good contact for capacitance measurements. The capacitance measurements were carried out at room temperature with a QuadTech 7600 precision LRC Meter impedance analyzer over the frequency range 1 kHz–2 MHz.


### 2.3. Synthesis of 7-methacryloyloxy Coumarin (MAOC)

The synthesis of 7-methacryloyloxy coumarin (MAOC) monomer carried out according to the usual method [17]. The product was recrystallized from ethanol (mp measured by DSC: 105°C).IR (KBr, thin film, cm−1): 3073 (−CH stretching of the aromatic ring), 2986 (−CH3), 1737 (broad, C=O in ester), 1630 (C=C), 1230 (asymmetric C–O–C), and 1142 (symmetric C–O–C).1H NMR (δ ppm, CDCl3): 2.08 (s, 3H, CH3), 5.84 (s, 1H, CH=), 6.40 (s, 1H, CH=), 7.02–7.74 (4H, on coumarin ring), and 6,38 (s, 1H, =CH next to C=O on coumarin group).


### 2.4. Synthesis of Benzyl Methacrylate (BMA)

BMA was synthesized by reaction benzylalcohol with methacryloyl chloride in presence of triethyl amine at 0–5°C.IR (cm−1, the most characteristic bands): 1738 (C=O stretching), 1638 (C=C in the vinyl group), and 1600 (C=C stretch in aromatic ring).13C NMR (CDCI3, δppm): 17.7 (CH3), 65.7 (–OCH2–), 135.9 (ipso carbon on aromatic ring), 124.8–128.0 (CH on aromatic ring), and 136.8 (=C), 166.0 (C=O).1H-NMR (CDCI3, δppm): 1.96 (s, 3H), 5.3 (s, 2H), 5.6(s, 1H), 6.2 (s, 1H), and 7.3 (5H).


### 2.5. Free Radical Polymerization of MAOC

MAOC was recrycstallized within ethylalcohol. monomer was polymerized at 60°C in 1,4-dioxane in the presence of AIBN as an initiator. The poly(MAOC) was purified by precipitation in petroleum ether. This process was repeated twice. The polymer was then dried at 40°C for 24 h.


### 2.6. Free Radical Copolymerization of MAOC with BMA, MMA, EMA, and IBMA

First, six copolymers of MAOC with BMA were prepared in 1,4-dioxane at 60°C in the presence of AIBN. Predetermined amounts of the monomers, AIBN, and the solvent were mixed in a polymerization tube. The mixture was degassed for about 10 min with argon and kept in a thermostated oil bath at 60°C. After desired time the mixture was cooled to ambient temperature. The copolymers were precipitated into excess ethanol and purified by reprecipitation, and then the copolymers were dried at 40°C for 24 h. Also, copolymers of MAOC with MMA, EMA, and IBMA was prepared under the same conditions. The copolymeric units of MAOC with MMA, EMA, and IBMA can be represented according to Scheme1.Scheme 1
The structure monomeric units of the copolymer.


### 2.7. Preparation of Polymer Blends

Poly(MAOC) and poly(BMA) blend samples were prepared by solution casting from dichloromethane at room temperature, and the blends were dried at room temperaturein vacuo.


## 2.1. Materials

7-hydroxycoumarin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Isobutyl methyacrylate (IBMA), methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate (EMA) (Aldrich) were distilled under vacuum before use. 2,2′-Azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN), methacryloyl chloride, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and ethanol (Fluka) were used without further purification.


## 2.2. Measurements

1H NMR spectra were obtained on a AVANCE III 400 MHz Bruker, using CDCl3 as the solvent and tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. Infrared spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum One FT-IR spectrometer. Calorimetric measurements were carried out on a Shimadzu DSC-50 thermal analyzer under N2 flow a using a heating rate of 20°C/min. Experiments were carried out on approximately 3–5 mg samples at a heating rate of 10°C min−1 under nitrogen flow conditions (10 cm3 min−1). The molecular weight and molecular weight distribution were determined using an Agilent 1100 gel permeation chromatography (GPC) system equipped with a Waters Styragel column, a refractive index detector, and a pump. The column was calibrated with polystyrene, and samples were eluted using THF. The polymer was ground with an agate mortar and pestle, and the final fine powder was pressed at four tons of pressure into disk-shaped samples with a thickness ranging from 0.94 mm to 2.22 mm and a diameter of 12 mm. The entire surface of the discs was coated with silver paste, which acts as a good contact for capacitance measurements. The capacitance measurements were carried out at room temperature with a QuadTech 7600 precision LRC Meter impedance analyzer over the frequency range 1 kHz–2 MHz.


## 2.3. Synthesis of 7-methacryloyloxy Coumarin (MAOC)

The synthesis of 7-methacryloyloxy coumarin (MAOC) monomer carried out according to the usual method [17]. The product was recrystallized from ethanol (mp measured by DSC: 105°C).IR (KBr, thin film, cm−1): 3073 (−CH stretching of the aromatic ring), 2986 (−CH3), 1737 (broad, C=O in ester), 1630 (C=C), 1230 (asymmetric C–O–C), and 1142 (symmetric C–O–C).1H NMR (δ ppm, CDCl3): 2.08 (s, 3H, CH3), 5.84 (s, 1H, CH=), 6.40 (s, 1H, CH=), 7.02–7.74 (4H, on coumarin ring), and 6,38 (s, 1H, =CH next to C=O on coumarin group).


## 2.4. Synthesis of Benzyl Methacrylate (BMA)

BMA was synthesized by reaction benzylalcohol with methacryloyl chloride in presence of triethyl amine at 0–5°C.IR (cm−1, the most characteristic bands): 1738 (C=O stretching), 1638 (C=C in the vinyl group), and 1600 (C=C stretch in aromatic ring).13C NMR (CDCI3, δppm): 17.7 (CH3), 65.7 (–OCH2–), 135.9 (ipso carbon on aromatic ring), 124.8–128.0 (CH on aromatic ring), and 136.8 (=C), 166.0 (C=O).1H-NMR (CDCI3, δppm): 1.96 (s, 3H), 5.3 (s, 2H), 5.6(s, 1H), 6.2 (s, 1H), and 7.3 (5H).


## 2.5. Free Radical Polymerization of MAOC

MAOC was recrycstallized within ethylalcohol. monomer was polymerized at 60°C in 1,4-dioxane in the presence of AIBN as an initiator. The poly(MAOC) was purified by precipitation in petroleum ether. This process was repeated twice. The polymer was then dried at 40°C for 24 h.


## 2.6. Free Radical Copolymerization of MAOC with BMA, MMA, EMA, and IBMA

First, six copolymers of MAOC with BMA were prepared in 1,4-dioxane at 60°C in the presence of AIBN. Predetermined amounts of the monomers, AIBN, and the solvent were mixed in a polymerization tube. The mixture was degassed for about 10 min with argon and kept in a thermostated oil bath at 60°C. After desired time the mixture was cooled to ambient temperature. The copolymers were precipitated into excess ethanol and purified by reprecipitation, and then the copolymers were dried at 40°C for 24 h. Also, copolymers of MAOC with MMA, EMA, and IBMA was prepared under the same conditions. The copolymeric units of MAOC with MMA, EMA, and IBMA can be represented according to Scheme1.Scheme 1
The structure monomeric units of the copolymer.


## 2.7. Preparation of Polymer Blends

Poly(MAOC) and poly(BMA) blend samples were prepared by solution casting from dichloromethane at room temperature, and the blends were dried at room temperaturein vacuo.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization of Copolymers

The1H NMR spectra of poly(MAOC), poly(BMA), and MAOC-BMA copolymers prepared via free radical polymerization (FRP) are shown in Figure 1. The peaks at 6.36–7.3 ppm reveal the coumarin ring protons, and the signal at 4.91 ppm is assigned to methylene adjacent to ester oxygen in BMA units. As the MAOC units in copolymer increases from 19 to 84 mol %, the intensity of =CHC=O protons in MAOC units gradually increases. The other signals, 1.1–2.2 ppm, are due to the methyl and methylene protons of the main backbone in MAOC and BMA units. The 13C NMR spectrum illustrated in Figure 2 of the copolymer (with 58 mol % MAOC units) has the most characteristic peaks of the monomeric units at 177.2 ppm (C=O in BMA units), 176.9 ppm (C=O in MOC units), 160.0 ppm (C=O on coumarin ring in MAOC units), 80.95 ppm (–OCH2–Ar), 54 and 52.78 ppm (quaternary carbons of BMA and MAOC in both units, resp.), and 160,0 ppm (C=O on coumarin ring).1H NMR spectra of poly(MAOC), poly(BMA) and six copolymer compositions.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)Figure 2
13C NMR spectrum of poly(MAOC:BMA) (42 : 58 mol %).1H NMR spectra of poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19), poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19), and poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23) showed important signals at 6.25–7.80 ppm (aromatic protons), and signals at 3.66 ppm (2H, –OCH3 in MMA unit), 4.06 ppm (2H, –OCH2 in EMA unit), and 3.72 ppm (3H, –OCH2CH(CH3)2) in IBMA unit).The IR spectra of the resulting copolymers with various feed ratios of MAOC and BMA prepared by free radical copolymerization showed the absorbance at 737 and 697 cm−1, which is attributed to a vibration characteristic of a monosubstituted benzene ring in BMA moieties. The stretchs at 737 and 697 cm−1, whose relative intensities gradually increase as the percentage of BMA in the copolymers increases from 16 to 81 mole % (or from 19 to 84% in view of MAOC unit). The peak at 1731 cm−1 is assigned to the vibration of ester carbonyl in MAOC and BMA units. IR spectra of copolymers of MAOC with MMA, EMA, and IBMA are similar to each other. But that of poly(MAOC-co-IBMA) is as a significant different for C–H vibration of isobuthyl group at 1470–1360 cm−1. Figure 3 shows the UV-vis spectra of polymer, both the homopolymer and the copolymer had a strong UV-vis absorption at 322 nm. However, the weaker UV-vis absorption intensities of the polymer from 268 nm to 300 nm wavelength could be attributed to the disappearance of intermolecular or intramolecular exciplex between the electron-donating chromophore and the electron-deficient metacrylic carbon-carbon double bonds [18].Absorption spectra of poly(MAOC) and some copolymers in THF at 10−5 moldm−3.
(a)(b)(c)(d)The monomer feed ratio and theMn and Mw/Mn for poly(MAOC) and its copolymers with MMA, EMA, and IBMA are listed in Table 1. The monomer feed ratio and the Mn and Mw/Mn of six copolymer for MAOC-BMA copolymer system are listed in Table 2. In MAOC-BMA copolymer system, it increases in Mn values with an increasing molar fraction of BMA in the copolymer. This therefore indicates that the decreasing average molecular weight of the copolymer can be manipulated by the controlled polymerization conversion of BMA units. The resulting copolymers possess relatively narrow polydispersities (1.1 < Mw/Mn < 1.27). This suggests that the contribution of chain breaking and transfer as well as termination reactions during copolymerization can be neglected until a higher polymerization conversion, which is similar to the result reported by Popielarz et al. [19].Table 1
Initial and experimental data of MAOC in copolymer compositions.
CopolymersM1aIntensity of aromatic protonsIntensities of aliphatic protonsm1bMn(MwMn) GPCPoly(MAOC-co-MMA)0.250.201.670.1931.000 (1.56)Poly(MAOC-co-EMA)0.230.151.840.1920.300 (1.68)Poly(MAOC-co-IBMA)0.300.181.200.2328.800 (1.81)a: Initial mole fraction of MAOC in feed.b: Mole fraction of MAOC in copolymers.Table 2
Copolymerization of MAOC and BMA at various monomer feedsa and copolymer characteristics.
Samplea NoM1bIntensity of =CHC=O proton in MAOC UnitIntensity of –OCH2- protons in BMA Unitm1cMn(Mw/Mn)(GPC)Time (h)d10.190.90100.155000 (1.20)1220.371.55100.244000 (1.15)1230.442.60100.355300 (1.22)1240.503.50100.423800 (1.27)1250.777.35100.603900 (1.25)1260.8415.65100.763800 (1.11)12a: conditions of polymerization; FRP at 60°C.b: mole fraction of MAOC in feed.c: mole fraction of MAOC in copolymer.d: the copolymers were prepared at low conversions (<15%).


### 3.2. Determination of Copolymer Composition by1H NMR

The1H NMR technique is well established as a simple rapid, and accurate method for the determination of copolymer composition [16, 17]. The assignment of the resonance peaks in 1H NMR spectrum allows for the accurate evaluation of the content of each kind of monomeric unit incorporated into the copolymer chain. Thus, the mole fraction of MAOC in the copolymer chains was calculated from integrated intensities of aromatic protons of MAOC and aliphatic protons of MMA, EMA, and IBMA units. The following expression applies to copolymers. Let m1 be the mole fraction of MAOC and 1-m1 that of MMA, EMA, and IBMA. There are one olephinic proton the neighboring to carbonyl in MAOC unit and, protons which are adjacent to ester oxygen in MMA, EMA and IBMA units. Table 1 gives the value of mole fraction of MAOC on the copolymers. All copolymer samples exhibited higher concentrations of MMA, EMA, and IBMA units.


### 3.3. Monomer Reactivity Ratios

The free radical copolymerization of MAOC and BMA initiated AIBN for various ratios of MAOC and BMA has been carried out 60°C. Table1 shows the influence of the initial molar compositions of the comonomers on those of the comonomers in the copolymers, for free radical copolymerization. Knowledge of the copolymer composition is an important step in the evaluation of its utility. The copolymer composition and its distribution depend on monomer reactivity ratios. The copolymer compositions to determine monomer reactivity ratios were analyzed  by  1NMR spectra. Figure 1 shows 1H NMR spectra of the copolymer prepared by FRP. The peaks at 6,36 ppm correspond to the aromatic protons, which is next to C=O on coumarin ring in MAOC units, the signal centered at 4.91 ppm is assigned to methylene protons adjacent to oxygen in BMA units. The other signals at 1–2.2 ppm are assigned to methylene and methyl in the polymer main chain for two units. Thus, the mole fractions of MAOC and BMA in the copolymer were determined from the ratio of the integral intensities of aromatic protons, which is next to C=O on coumarin ring in MAOC units, 6,36 (1H) ppm, and the methylene protons adjacent to oxygen at 4,91 ppm for BMA units. Copolymer compositions have been calculated from the following equation: integral intensities of aromatic protons (IAr), integral intensities of aliphatic protons (IAlp)(1)C=Integralvaluesof=CHC=Oprotonson⁡coumarinringofMAOCunitIntegralvaluesofOCH2protonsinBMAunit=m12m2Onsimplification;m1=2C1+2C,wherem1 is mole fraction of MAOC and m2 is that of BMA in copolymer. The K–T and F–R parameters were calculated, using data in Table 2, for free radical copolymerization of MAOC and BMA, and the results were summarized in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. It is well known that monomer reactivity ratios can be indicative of relative reactivity of comonomers [20, 21]. To estimate the relative reactivity of MAOC and BMA in free radical copolymerization, the Yee et al. [22] and Tüdös and Kelen [23] equations were used, which are η=((r1+r2)/α)ξ-r2/α and G=r1H-r2, respectively. (Notations in the equations are described in Tables 2 and 3.) The plots of G versus H and η versus ξ for copolymer system are shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. From the slope and intercept, the monomer reactivity ratios of MAOC and BMA were determined and found to be r1=0,45,r2=1,29;r1=0.46;r2=1,33, respectively (r1 is monomer reactivity ratio of MAOC). Monomer reactivity ratio of BMA is slightly higher than 1, and that of MAOC is importantly lesser than 1, for the copolymerization. r1·r2=0,58. Apparently, the values of monomer reactivity ratios indicate that the growing radicals with BMA ends were added to MAOC or BMA monomers, but the radicals with BMA ends have a lesser tendency to be added to MAOC, in radical copolymerizations. The copolymerization system is more manipulated by BMA radicals. Distributions of the monomeric units along the copolymer chains are random, and they are slightly richer in BMA units. The microstructure of a polymeric material plays an important role in the behavior of the material toward a variety of biological systems and could be especially important in copolymerizations with monomers of different reactivities [24].Table 3
Results of the free radical copolymerization of MAOC and BMA.
DeneyF=M1/M2f=m1/m2G=F(f-1)/fH=F2/fη=G/(α+H)ξ=H/(α+H)10,230,17−1,120,31−0,570,1620,580,33−1,171,01−0,440,3830,780,53−0,691,14−0,250,4141,000,72−0,381,38−0,130,4653,341,501,117,430,120,8265,253,163,588,720,350,84M1: mole fraction of PMA in feed; M2: mole fraction of MMA in feed; m1: mole fraction of PMA in copolymer; m2: mole fraction of MMA in copolymer. (Hmin, Hmax)1/2 = 1,64; Hmin: lowest value of H, Hmax: highest value of H.Table 4
TGA data for the Polymers.
PolymersTia (°C)T%50b (°C)Weight loss (%) at 350°CWeight loss (%) at 400°CResidue at 500°CPoly(MAOC)27137136738Poly(MAOC 0,60-co-BMA)22735743866Poly(MAOC 0,35-co-BMA)19036045855Poly(MAOC 0,15-co-BMA)180330658910Poly(BMA)176298788712Poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19)26835546974Poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19)26936636831Poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23)24432266981Poly(MAOC) 0,35-poly(BMA)  (blend polymer)22231875889Poly(MAOC) 0,15-poly(BMA)  (blend polymer)21933865961a: initial decomposition temperature of first stage,b: decomposition temperature at 50% weight loss,c: by mole.(a) Kelen-Tüdös and (b) Fineman-Ross plots for the free radical polymerization of MAOC and BMA.
(a)(b)For the copolymerizations, the behaviors of the systems were evaluated through plots of the copolymer compositions (m1) measured from 1H NMR as the molar fraction of MAOC versus the feed compositions is measured as the molar fraction of MAOC (M1) (Figure 5). It is seen that compositions of copolymer obtained from the copolymerization technique showed a positive deviation than linearly and did not show that they have an azeotropic composition. In normal free radical polymerization, continuous initiation leads to chain initiation and termination at different stages of the polymerization [25]. The values of Mw/Mn in copolymerization are also known to depend on chain termination in the same way as in homopolymerization [4].Figure 5
Composition diagrams of free radical copolymerization.


### 3.4. DSC Measurements

It is well recognised that intrinsic flexibility of polymeric chains is related to the glass transition temperature in amorphous macromolecules, with the measure of theTg being a good way to know the segmental mobility of polymer and copolymer chains of high molecular weight, in which the influence of chain ends is negligible [26]. The glass-transition temperatures (Tg) of poly (MAOC) and all the copolymers were determined from the inflection points on the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves (Figure 6 and Table 1). All the copolymers showed a single transition. P(MAOC) had a Tg value higher than those of all the copolymers. This means that two units in copolymer composition form a single phase. The Tg of poly(MAOC) synthesized in this study was measured as 146°C. However, Tgs of poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19), poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19), poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23) are 138, 112, and 106°C, respectively.Figure 6
DSC traces of (a) poly(MAOC), (b) poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19), (c) poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19),  and (d) poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23).The glass transition temperature of MAOC and BMA copolymers prepared by FRP was determined by DSC. TheTg values of poly(BMA) and poly(MAOC) were found to be 54°C and 146°C, respectively. The Tg values obtained for the blends were between 70°C and 120°C (Figure 7) in accordance with the increasing percentage of PMAOC. The Tg value of the 76 mol % PMAOC copolymer was 117°C. The high Tg value of the homopolymer was justified by the rigidity of coumarin ring present in the side chains, and mainly by the capability of forming intermolecular dipole-dipole attraction on coumarine with bulk side group. The observed Tgs of the blend polymers indicate a slightly positive deviation with respect to linearity, which can be associated with a slightly lower free volume than that of a mixture of MAOC and BMA. It is known that an immiscible blend shows glass transition temperature of each individual polymer, but a miscible blend shows only one glass transition temperature. Figure 8 shows DSC curves of poly(MAOC) and poly(BMA) blends. Each polymer blend prepared in this study shows single transition, which can be attributed to poly(MAOC) and poly(BMA) that give the compatible blends. An inner shift of single Tgs for poly(MAOC):poly(BMA) blends indicate good compatibility of both polymers. Plots of the Tg values versus mole fractions of PMAOC in the blends are shown in Figure 9. Both the polymers contain polar ester and nonpolar alkyl groups, and they indicate similar kinds of interactions, and also, as was seen in Table 5 their average molecular weights are relatively low. The Tgs by depending on the same composition of copolymer and blend polymers were observed very similar to each other. The Tg values of the blends and copolymer showed low-positive deviation as illustrated in Figure 9. Since syndiotactic distribution in the homopolymer units is dominant, interchain interactions along the polymer chains in the blend are low because of steric hindrance. This results in increasing of free volume in the blend, and decreasing of their Tg values with respect to linearity. The stereoeffects strongly depends on the monomer structures [27]. Therefore, enhancing the stereoeffect may be effective in view of syndiotactic for methacrylates with the relatively bulky side group such as coumarine and phenyl group.Table 5
Dielectric constant, GPC, and DSC data of the polymers.
PolymersDielectric constant (ε′) at 1 kHzMn(HI=Mw/Mn)Tg (°C)Poly(MAOC)4,7530.700 (1,56)146Poly(MAOC-co-MMA0,19)4,1820.300 (1,68)138Poly(MAOC-co-EMA0,19)4,1532.300 (1,69)112Poly(MAOC-co-IBMA0,23)4,0128.800 (1,81)107Figure 7
DSC curves of copolymer system: (a) poly(MAOC), (b) poly(MAOC 0,76-co-BMA), (c) poly(MAOC 0,60-co-BMA), (d) poly(MAOC 0,35-co-BMA), (e) poly(MAOC 0,15-co-BMA), and (f) poly(BMA) heated at 20°C/min to 200°C.Figure 8
DSC curves of  blend polymers: (a) poly(MAOC), (b) poly(MAOC)0,76-poly(BMA), (c) poly(MAOC)0,60-poly(BMA), (d) poly(MAOC)0,15-poly(BMA), and (e) poly(BMA) heated at 20°C/min to 200°C.Figure 9
Plots of theTg of a series polymers as a function of MAOC in the blend  and copolymer systems.


### 3.5. Thermogravimetric Studies of the Polymers

Thermal studies of the homopolymer and the copolymers were investigated by thermogravimetric measurements. The thermogravimetric curves of poly(MAOC), poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19), poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19), and poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23) prepared by FRP are shown in Figure10. Some thermal degradation characteristics of homo- and copolymers are summarized in Table 5. All the polymers show a thermal degradation with two stages. For the first stage, while the initial decomposition temperature of poly(MAOC) and poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19), poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19), and poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23) are 270, 267, 268, and 244°C, respectively. The second stage, that is, 64% weight loss (with a signal) random chain scission starts at 322°C for poly(MAOC), and between 310 and 360°C by depending on this kind of the copolymers. Observing higher weight loss in poly(MAOC) is due to mass of coumarin group. The second stage decomposition starts at a lower temperature for poly(IBMA). After 336°C, thermal stability of poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19) and poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19) is increasing. This tendency is also seen at temperatures with 50% weight loss, for example, 348°C for poly(MAOC), 372 and 375°C for the poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19) and poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19). All these results show that the thermal stabilities of the polymers decrease to 336°C with an presence of alkyl methacrylate units in copolymers. But after 336°C, it showed that it increased that of the other copolymers except for poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23).Figure 10
TGA curves of homo and copolymers heated under nitrogen at 10°C/min heating rate from room temperature to 500°C.The thermogravimetric curves for poly(MAOC), poly(BMA), and the three MAOC-BMA copolymers recorded under conditions above mentioned are given in Figure11 as in comparison with each other. Decomposition temperature of poly(BMA) prepared by FRP occurs in a single step at about 176°C. On the other hand, poly(MAOC) and MAOC-BMA copolymers prepared by free-radical polymerization shows a two-stage decomposition. For the first stage, while the initial decomposition temperature of poly(MAOC) is 271°C, in the second stage, that is, 64% weight loss (with a signal) random chain scission starts at 322°C for poly(MAOC). The thermal stabilities of MAOC-BMA copolymer systems are considerably different from those of homopolymers. For example, poly(MAOC-co-BMA 0,35) shows a decomposition with a two stage. For the first stage, while its initial decomposition temperature is 190°C, in the second stage, that is, 71% weight loss random chain scission starts at 302°C for poly(MAOC-co-BMA 0,35). Also, the similar behaviors are observed in the other two copolymer systems. Decreasing of initial decomposition temperature of copolymers is due to in BMA units. TGA results of MAOC-BMA copolymer system are summarized in Table 4 as compared with those of poly(BMA)-prepared FRP. The copolymers showed that thermal stability decreased with increasing BMA for copolymer system. A similar tendency for poly(MAOC):poly(BMA) blends is also seen at temperatures with 50% weight loss, for example, 338°C for poly(MAOC 0,15-co-BMA), 330°C for the poly(MAOC)0,15-poly(BMA) blend, and 350°C for the poly(MAOC) 0,35-poly(BMA) blend. All these results show that the thermal stabilities of the polymers decrease with an increase of BMA content in blend or copolymer system.Figure 11
TGA curves of  poly(MAOC) and copolymers heated under nitrogen at 10°C/min heating rate from room temperature to 500°C.


### 3.6. Dielectric Measurements

The frequency-dependent measurements of paralel capacitance,Cp, and dissipation factor, Df, were obtained using impedance analyzer for different frequencies in the range 100 Hz–2 MHz and ambient room to 453 K. The dielectric constant (ε′) and dielectric loss factor (ε′′) were determined as per the following expressions: (2)ε′=Cpdε0A,(3)ε′′=ε′Df,
where Cp is parallel capacitance, ε0 is permittivity in free space (ε0 = 8.854.10−12 F/m) [28], d is thickness of the polymer sample, and A is surface area of the sample.The plot of dielectric constant,ε′ versus frequency for poly(MAOC), poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19), poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19), and poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23) at various temperatures for constant frequency is shown in Figure 6, respectively. In all the polymers the ε′ decreased with increase in frequency and increased with increase in temperature. Overall, the dielectric constant of homo- and copolymers was measured to be in the range 4,75–4,0 at 1 kHz as was summarized in Table 4. This tendency in dielectric constant is in agreement with the reported values for similar poly(methacrylate) systems [29–31].Figure12 shows the dependence of the dielectric constant on frequence (1 kHz-2 MHz) for poly(MAOC), poly(MAOC-co-MMA), poly(MAOC-co-EMA), and poly(MAOC-co-IBMA). The dielectric constant (ε′=4,75) of poly(MAOC) has a value slightly higher according to that of its copolymers. This is probably due to the strong effect of the ester group on molecular polarity. The dielectric constant decreased in case of alkyl groups such as methyl, ethyl, and isobutyl which is next to ester in copolymer. Dielectric constant values of poly(MAOC-co-MMA) (ε′=4,18), poly(MAOC-co-EMA) (ε′=4,15) and poly(MAOC-co-IBuMA) (ε′=4,01). The increase of ε′ with increase in temperature is usually associated with the decrease in bond energies [32]. That is, as the temperature increases two effects on the dipolar polarization may occur: (i) it weakens the intermolecular forces and hence enhances the orientational vibration, (ii) it increases the thermal agitation and hence strongly disturbs the orientational vibrations. The dielectric constant becomes larger at lower frequencies and at higher temperatures which is normal in oxide glasses and is not an indication for spontaneous polarization [33]. This may be due to the fact that as the frequency increases, the polarizability contribution from ionic and orientation sources decreases and finally disappears due to the inertia of the ions. Also, this may be due to the tendency of induced dipoles in the polymer to orient themselves in the direction of the applied field [34].Variation of the dielectric constants (a) and the dielectric loss (b) with frequency for polymers.
(a)(b)In Figure13, it can also be seen that ε′ increases with increase in temperature and at high temperatures it increases more rapidly. This behavior is similar to the polar dielectrics in which the orientation of dipoles is facilitated with rising temperature and thereby the dielectric constant is increased. At low temperatures, the contribution of electronic and ionic components to the total polarizability will be small. As the temperature is increased the electronic and ionic polarizability sources start to increase or the dipoles comparatively become free and they respond to the applied electric field. Thus polarization increases and hence dielectric constant also increases with temperature and as the temperature is increased the electronic and ionic polarizability sources start to increase [35]. These temperatures are values closed to glass transition temperatures of corresponding polymers. Figure 7 shows the variation of dielectric loss factor ε′′ with temperature at three different frequencies for all the samples. Dielectric loss due to chain motion polymers are more effective at around the glass transition temperature. A result, the compositional dependence of dielectric loss is similar to that of ac conductivity and dielectric constant.Variation of dielectric constant of polymers with temperature at 1, 10, and 50 KHz.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.1. Characterization of Copolymers

The1H NMR spectra of poly(MAOC), poly(BMA), and MAOC-BMA copolymers prepared via free radical polymerization (FRP) are shown in Figure 1. The peaks at 6.36–7.3 ppm reveal the coumarin ring protons, and the signal at 4.91 ppm is assigned to methylene adjacent to ester oxygen in BMA units. As the MAOC units in copolymer increases from 19 to 84 mol %, the intensity of =CHC=O protons in MAOC units gradually increases. The other signals, 1.1–2.2 ppm, are due to the methyl and methylene protons of the main backbone in MAOC and BMA units. The 13C NMR spectrum illustrated in Figure 2 of the copolymer (with 58 mol % MAOC units) has the most characteristic peaks of the monomeric units at 177.2 ppm (C=O in BMA units), 176.9 ppm (C=O in MOC units), 160.0 ppm (C=O on coumarin ring in MAOC units), 80.95 ppm (–OCH2–Ar), 54 and 52.78 ppm (quaternary carbons of BMA and MAOC in both units, resp.), and 160,0 ppm (C=O on coumarin ring).1H NMR spectra of poly(MAOC), poly(BMA) and six copolymer compositions.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)Figure 2
13C NMR spectrum of poly(MAOC:BMA) (42 : 58 mol %).1H NMR spectra of poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19), poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19), and poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23) showed important signals at 6.25–7.80 ppm (aromatic protons), and signals at 3.66 ppm (2H, –OCH3 in MMA unit), 4.06 ppm (2H, –OCH2 in EMA unit), and 3.72 ppm (3H, –OCH2CH(CH3)2) in IBMA unit).The IR spectra of the resulting copolymers with various feed ratios of MAOC and BMA prepared by free radical copolymerization showed the absorbance at 737 and 697 cm−1, which is attributed to a vibration characteristic of a monosubstituted benzene ring in BMA moieties. The stretchs at 737 and 697 cm−1, whose relative intensities gradually increase as the percentage of BMA in the copolymers increases from 16 to 81 mole % (or from 19 to 84% in view of MAOC unit). The peak at 1731 cm−1 is assigned to the vibration of ester carbonyl in MAOC and BMA units. IR spectra of copolymers of MAOC with MMA, EMA, and IBMA are similar to each other. But that of poly(MAOC-co-IBMA) is as a significant different for C–H vibration of isobuthyl group at 1470–1360 cm−1. Figure 3 shows the UV-vis spectra of polymer, both the homopolymer and the copolymer had a strong UV-vis absorption at 322 nm. However, the weaker UV-vis absorption intensities of the polymer from 268 nm to 300 nm wavelength could be attributed to the disappearance of intermolecular or intramolecular exciplex between the electron-donating chromophore and the electron-deficient metacrylic carbon-carbon double bonds [18].Absorption spectra of poly(MAOC) and some copolymers in THF at 10−5 moldm−3.
(a)(b)(c)(d)The monomer feed ratio and theMn and Mw/Mn for poly(MAOC) and its copolymers with MMA, EMA, and IBMA are listed in Table 1. The monomer feed ratio and the Mn and Mw/Mn of six copolymer for MAOC-BMA copolymer system are listed in Table 2. In MAOC-BMA copolymer system, it increases in Mn values with an increasing molar fraction of BMA in the copolymer. This therefore indicates that the decreasing average molecular weight of the copolymer can be manipulated by the controlled polymerization conversion of BMA units. The resulting copolymers possess relatively narrow polydispersities (1.1 < Mw/Mn < 1.27). This suggests that the contribution of chain breaking and transfer as well as termination reactions during copolymerization can be neglected until a higher polymerization conversion, which is similar to the result reported by Popielarz et al. [19].Table 1
Initial and experimental data of MAOC in copolymer compositions.
CopolymersM1aIntensity of aromatic protonsIntensities of aliphatic protonsm1bMn(MwMn) GPCPoly(MAOC-co-MMA)0.250.201.670.1931.000 (1.56)Poly(MAOC-co-EMA)0.230.151.840.1920.300 (1.68)Poly(MAOC-co-IBMA)0.300.181.200.2328.800 (1.81)a: Initial mole fraction of MAOC in feed.b: Mole fraction of MAOC in copolymers.Table 2
Copolymerization of MAOC and BMA at various monomer feedsa and copolymer characteristics.
Samplea NoM1bIntensity of =CHC=O proton in MAOC UnitIntensity of –OCH2- protons in BMA Unitm1cMn(Mw/Mn)(GPC)Time (h)d10.190.90100.155000 (1.20)1220.371.55100.244000 (1.15)1230.442.60100.355300 (1.22)1240.503.50100.423800 (1.27)1250.777.35100.603900 (1.25)1260.8415.65100.763800 (1.11)12a: conditions of polymerization; FRP at 60°C.b: mole fraction of MAOC in feed.c: mole fraction of MAOC in copolymer.d: the copolymers were prepared at low conversions (<15%).


## 3.2. Determination of Copolymer Composition by1H NMR

The1H NMR technique is well established as a simple rapid, and accurate method for the determination of copolymer composition [16, 17]. The assignment of the resonance peaks in 1H NMR spectrum allows for the accurate evaluation of the content of each kind of monomeric unit incorporated into the copolymer chain. Thus, the mole fraction of MAOC in the copolymer chains was calculated from integrated intensities of aromatic protons of MAOC and aliphatic protons of MMA, EMA, and IBMA units. The following expression applies to copolymers. Let m1 be the mole fraction of MAOC and 1-m1 that of MMA, EMA, and IBMA. There are one olephinic proton the neighboring to carbonyl in MAOC unit and, protons which are adjacent to ester oxygen in MMA, EMA and IBMA units. Table 1 gives the value of mole fraction of MAOC on the copolymers. All copolymer samples exhibited higher concentrations of MMA, EMA, and IBMA units.


## 3.3. Monomer Reactivity Ratios

The free radical copolymerization of MAOC and BMA initiated AIBN for various ratios of MAOC and BMA has been carried out 60°C. Table1 shows the influence of the initial molar compositions of the comonomers on those of the comonomers in the copolymers, for free radical copolymerization. Knowledge of the copolymer composition is an important step in the evaluation of its utility. The copolymer composition and its distribution depend on monomer reactivity ratios. The copolymer compositions to determine monomer reactivity ratios were analyzed  by  1NMR spectra. Figure 1 shows 1H NMR spectra of the copolymer prepared by FRP. The peaks at 6,36 ppm correspond to the aromatic protons, which is next to C=O on coumarin ring in MAOC units, the signal centered at 4.91 ppm is assigned to methylene protons adjacent to oxygen in BMA units. The other signals at 1–2.2 ppm are assigned to methylene and methyl in the polymer main chain for two units. Thus, the mole fractions of MAOC and BMA in the copolymer were determined from the ratio of the integral intensities of aromatic protons, which is next to C=O on coumarin ring in MAOC units, 6,36 (1H) ppm, and the methylene protons adjacent to oxygen at 4,91 ppm for BMA units. Copolymer compositions have been calculated from the following equation: integral intensities of aromatic protons (IAr), integral intensities of aliphatic protons (IAlp)(1)C=Integralvaluesof=CHC=Oprotonson⁡coumarinringofMAOCunitIntegralvaluesofOCH2protonsinBMAunit=m12m2Onsimplification;m1=2C1+2C,wherem1 is mole fraction of MAOC and m2 is that of BMA in copolymer. The K–T and F–R parameters were calculated, using data in Table 2, for free radical copolymerization of MAOC and BMA, and the results were summarized in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. It is well known that monomer reactivity ratios can be indicative of relative reactivity of comonomers [20, 21]. To estimate the relative reactivity of MAOC and BMA in free radical copolymerization, the Yee et al. [22] and Tüdös and Kelen [23] equations were used, which are η=((r1+r2)/α)ξ-r2/α and G=r1H-r2, respectively. (Notations in the equations are described in Tables 2 and 3.) The plots of G versus H and η versus ξ for copolymer system are shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. From the slope and intercept, the monomer reactivity ratios of MAOC and BMA were determined and found to be r1=0,45,r2=1,29;r1=0.46;r2=1,33, respectively (r1 is monomer reactivity ratio of MAOC). Monomer reactivity ratio of BMA is slightly higher than 1, and that of MAOC is importantly lesser than 1, for the copolymerization. r1·r2=0,58. Apparently, the values of monomer reactivity ratios indicate that the growing radicals with BMA ends were added to MAOC or BMA monomers, but the radicals with BMA ends have a lesser tendency to be added to MAOC, in radical copolymerizations. The copolymerization system is more manipulated by BMA radicals. Distributions of the monomeric units along the copolymer chains are random, and they are slightly richer in BMA units. The microstructure of a polymeric material plays an important role in the behavior of the material toward a variety of biological systems and could be especially important in copolymerizations with monomers of different reactivities [24].Table 3
Results of the free radical copolymerization of MAOC and BMA.
DeneyF=M1/M2f=m1/m2G=F(f-1)/fH=F2/fη=G/(α+H)ξ=H/(α+H)10,230,17−1,120,31−0,570,1620,580,33−1,171,01−0,440,3830,780,53−0,691,14−0,250,4141,000,72−0,381,38−0,130,4653,341,501,117,430,120,8265,253,163,588,720,350,84M1: mole fraction of PMA in feed; M2: mole fraction of MMA in feed; m1: mole fraction of PMA in copolymer; m2: mole fraction of MMA in copolymer. (Hmin, Hmax)1/2 = 1,64; Hmin: lowest value of H, Hmax: highest value of H.Table 4
TGA data for the Polymers.
PolymersTia (°C)T%50b (°C)Weight loss (%) at 350°CWeight loss (%) at 400°CResidue at 500°CPoly(MAOC)27137136738Poly(MAOC 0,60-co-BMA)22735743866Poly(MAOC 0,35-co-BMA)19036045855Poly(MAOC 0,15-co-BMA)180330658910Poly(BMA)176298788712Poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19)26835546974Poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19)26936636831Poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23)24432266981Poly(MAOC) 0,35-poly(BMA)  (blend polymer)22231875889Poly(MAOC) 0,15-poly(BMA)  (blend polymer)21933865961a: initial decomposition temperature of first stage,b: decomposition temperature at 50% weight loss,c: by mole.(a) Kelen-Tüdös and (b) Fineman-Ross plots for the free radical polymerization of MAOC and BMA.
(a)(b)For the copolymerizations, the behaviors of the systems were evaluated through plots of the copolymer compositions (m1) measured from 1H NMR as the molar fraction of MAOC versus the feed compositions is measured as the molar fraction of MAOC (M1) (Figure 5). It is seen that compositions of copolymer obtained from the copolymerization technique showed a positive deviation than linearly and did not show that they have an azeotropic composition. In normal free radical polymerization, continuous initiation leads to chain initiation and termination at different stages of the polymerization [25]. The values of Mw/Mn in copolymerization are also known to depend on chain termination in the same way as in homopolymerization [4].Figure 5
Composition diagrams of free radical copolymerization.


## 3.4. DSC Measurements

It is well recognised that intrinsic flexibility of polymeric chains is related to the glass transition temperature in amorphous macromolecules, with the measure of theTg being a good way to know the segmental mobility of polymer and copolymer chains of high molecular weight, in which the influence of chain ends is negligible [26]. The glass-transition temperatures (Tg) of poly (MAOC) and all the copolymers were determined from the inflection points on the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves (Figure 6 and Table 1). All the copolymers showed a single transition. P(MAOC) had a Tg value higher than those of all the copolymers. This means that two units in copolymer composition form a single phase. The Tg of poly(MAOC) synthesized in this study was measured as 146°C. However, Tgs of poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19), poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19), poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23) are 138, 112, and 106°C, respectively.Figure 6
DSC traces of (a) poly(MAOC), (b) poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19), (c) poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19),  and (d) poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23).The glass transition temperature of MAOC and BMA copolymers prepared by FRP was determined by DSC. TheTg values of poly(BMA) and poly(MAOC) were found to be 54°C and 146°C, respectively. The Tg values obtained for the blends were between 70°C and 120°C (Figure 7) in accordance with the increasing percentage of PMAOC. The Tg value of the 76 mol % PMAOC copolymer was 117°C. The high Tg value of the homopolymer was justified by the rigidity of coumarin ring present in the side chains, and mainly by the capability of forming intermolecular dipole-dipole attraction on coumarine with bulk side group. The observed Tgs of the blend polymers indicate a slightly positive deviation with respect to linearity, which can be associated with a slightly lower free volume than that of a mixture of MAOC and BMA. It is known that an immiscible blend shows glass transition temperature of each individual polymer, but a miscible blend shows only one glass transition temperature. Figure 8 shows DSC curves of poly(MAOC) and poly(BMA) blends. Each polymer blend prepared in this study shows single transition, which can be attributed to poly(MAOC) and poly(BMA) that give the compatible blends. An inner shift of single Tgs for poly(MAOC):poly(BMA) blends indicate good compatibility of both polymers. Plots of the Tg values versus mole fractions of PMAOC in the blends are shown in Figure 9. Both the polymers contain polar ester and nonpolar alkyl groups, and they indicate similar kinds of interactions, and also, as was seen in Table 5 their average molecular weights are relatively low. The Tgs by depending on the same composition of copolymer and blend polymers were observed very similar to each other. The Tg values of the blends and copolymer showed low-positive deviation as illustrated in Figure 9. Since syndiotactic distribution in the homopolymer units is dominant, interchain interactions along the polymer chains in the blend are low because of steric hindrance. This results in increasing of free volume in the blend, and decreasing of their Tg values with respect to linearity. The stereoeffects strongly depends on the monomer structures [27]. Therefore, enhancing the stereoeffect may be effective in view of syndiotactic for methacrylates with the relatively bulky side group such as coumarine and phenyl group.Table 5
Dielectric constant, GPC, and DSC data of the polymers.
PolymersDielectric constant (ε′) at 1 kHzMn(HI=Mw/Mn)Tg (°C)Poly(MAOC)4,7530.700 (1,56)146Poly(MAOC-co-MMA0,19)4,1820.300 (1,68)138Poly(MAOC-co-EMA0,19)4,1532.300 (1,69)112Poly(MAOC-co-IBMA0,23)4,0128.800 (1,81)107Figure 7
DSC curves of copolymer system: (a) poly(MAOC), (b) poly(MAOC 0,76-co-BMA), (c) poly(MAOC 0,60-co-BMA), (d) poly(MAOC 0,35-co-BMA), (e) poly(MAOC 0,15-co-BMA), and (f) poly(BMA) heated at 20°C/min to 200°C.Figure 8
DSC curves of  blend polymers: (a) poly(MAOC), (b) poly(MAOC)0,76-poly(BMA), (c) poly(MAOC)0,60-poly(BMA), (d) poly(MAOC)0,15-poly(BMA), and (e) poly(BMA) heated at 20°C/min to 200°C.Figure 9
Plots of theTg of a series polymers as a function of MAOC in the blend  and copolymer systems.


## 3.5. Thermogravimetric Studies of the Polymers

Thermal studies of the homopolymer and the copolymers were investigated by thermogravimetric measurements. The thermogravimetric curves of poly(MAOC), poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19), poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19), and poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23) prepared by FRP are shown in Figure10. Some thermal degradation characteristics of homo- and copolymers are summarized in Table 5. All the polymers show a thermal degradation with two stages. For the first stage, while the initial decomposition temperature of poly(MAOC) and poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19), poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19), and poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23) are 270, 267, 268, and 244°C, respectively. The second stage, that is, 64% weight loss (with a signal) random chain scission starts at 322°C for poly(MAOC), and between 310 and 360°C by depending on this kind of the copolymers. Observing higher weight loss in poly(MAOC) is due to mass of coumarin group. The second stage decomposition starts at a lower temperature for poly(IBMA). After 336°C, thermal stability of poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19) and poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19) is increasing. This tendency is also seen at temperatures with 50% weight loss, for example, 348°C for poly(MAOC), 372 and 375°C for the poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19) and poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19). All these results show that the thermal stabilities of the polymers decrease to 336°C with an presence of alkyl methacrylate units in copolymers. But after 336°C, it showed that it increased that of the other copolymers except for poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23).Figure 10
TGA curves of homo and copolymers heated under nitrogen at 10°C/min heating rate from room temperature to 500°C.The thermogravimetric curves for poly(MAOC), poly(BMA), and the three MAOC-BMA copolymers recorded under conditions above mentioned are given in Figure11 as in comparison with each other. Decomposition temperature of poly(BMA) prepared by FRP occurs in a single step at about 176°C. On the other hand, poly(MAOC) and MAOC-BMA copolymers prepared by free-radical polymerization shows a two-stage decomposition. For the first stage, while the initial decomposition temperature of poly(MAOC) is 271°C, in the second stage, that is, 64% weight loss (with a signal) random chain scission starts at 322°C for poly(MAOC). The thermal stabilities of MAOC-BMA copolymer systems are considerably different from those of homopolymers. For example, poly(MAOC-co-BMA 0,35) shows a decomposition with a two stage. For the first stage, while its initial decomposition temperature is 190°C, in the second stage, that is, 71% weight loss random chain scission starts at 302°C for poly(MAOC-co-BMA 0,35). Also, the similar behaviors are observed in the other two copolymer systems. Decreasing of initial decomposition temperature of copolymers is due to in BMA units. TGA results of MAOC-BMA copolymer system are summarized in Table 4 as compared with those of poly(BMA)-prepared FRP. The copolymers showed that thermal stability decreased with increasing BMA for copolymer system. A similar tendency for poly(MAOC):poly(BMA) blends is also seen at temperatures with 50% weight loss, for example, 338°C for poly(MAOC 0,15-co-BMA), 330°C for the poly(MAOC)0,15-poly(BMA) blend, and 350°C for the poly(MAOC) 0,35-poly(BMA) blend. All these results show that the thermal stabilities of the polymers decrease with an increase of BMA content in blend or copolymer system.Figure 11
TGA curves of  poly(MAOC) and copolymers heated under nitrogen at 10°C/min heating rate from room temperature to 500°C.


## 3.6. Dielectric Measurements

The frequency-dependent measurements of paralel capacitance,Cp, and dissipation factor, Df, were obtained using impedance analyzer for different frequencies in the range 100 Hz–2 MHz and ambient room to 453 K. The dielectric constant (ε′) and dielectric loss factor (ε′′) were determined as per the following expressions: (2)ε′=Cpdε0A,(3)ε′′=ε′Df,
where Cp is parallel capacitance, ε0 is permittivity in free space (ε0 = 8.854.10−12 F/m) [28], d is thickness of the polymer sample, and A is surface area of the sample.The plot of dielectric constant,ε′ versus frequency for poly(MAOC), poly(MAOC-co-MMA 0,19), poly(MAOC-co-EMA 0,19), and poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23) at various temperatures for constant frequency is shown in Figure 6, respectively. In all the polymers the ε′ decreased with increase in frequency and increased with increase in temperature. Overall, the dielectric constant of homo- and copolymers was measured to be in the range 4,75–4,0 at 1 kHz as was summarized in Table 4. This tendency in dielectric constant is in agreement with the reported values for similar poly(methacrylate) systems [29–31].Figure12 shows the dependence of the dielectric constant on frequence (1 kHz-2 MHz) for poly(MAOC), poly(MAOC-co-MMA), poly(MAOC-co-EMA), and poly(MAOC-co-IBMA). The dielectric constant (ε′=4,75) of poly(MAOC) has a value slightly higher according to that of its copolymers. This is probably due to the strong effect of the ester group on molecular polarity. The dielectric constant decreased in case of alkyl groups such as methyl, ethyl, and isobutyl which is next to ester in copolymer. Dielectric constant values of poly(MAOC-co-MMA) (ε′=4,18), poly(MAOC-co-EMA) (ε′=4,15) and poly(MAOC-co-IBuMA) (ε′=4,01). The increase of ε′ with increase in temperature is usually associated with the decrease in bond energies [32]. That is, as the temperature increases two effects on the dipolar polarization may occur: (i) it weakens the intermolecular forces and hence enhances the orientational vibration, (ii) it increases the thermal agitation and hence strongly disturbs the orientational vibrations. The dielectric constant becomes larger at lower frequencies and at higher temperatures which is normal in oxide glasses and is not an indication for spontaneous polarization [33]. This may be due to the fact that as the frequency increases, the polarizability contribution from ionic and orientation sources decreases and finally disappears due to the inertia of the ions. Also, this may be due to the tendency of induced dipoles in the polymer to orient themselves in the direction of the applied field [34].Variation of the dielectric constants (a) and the dielectric loss (b) with frequency for polymers.
(a)(b)In Figure13, it can also be seen that ε′ increases with increase in temperature and at high temperatures it increases more rapidly. This behavior is similar to the polar dielectrics in which the orientation of dipoles is facilitated with rising temperature and thereby the dielectric constant is increased. At low temperatures, the contribution of electronic and ionic components to the total polarizability will be small. As the temperature is increased the electronic and ionic polarizability sources start to increase or the dipoles comparatively become free and they respond to the applied electric field. Thus polarization increases and hence dielectric constant also increases with temperature and as the temperature is increased the electronic and ionic polarizability sources start to increase [35]. These temperatures are values closed to glass transition temperatures of corresponding polymers. Figure 7 shows the variation of dielectric loss factor ε′′ with temperature at three different frequencies for all the samples. Dielectric loss due to chain motion polymers are more effective at around the glass transition temperature. A result, the compositional dependence of dielectric loss is similar to that of ac conductivity and dielectric constant.Variation of dielectric constant of polymers with temperature at 1, 10, and 50 KHz.
(a)(b)(c)


## 4. Conclusion

Six MAOC-BMA copolymers and copolymers of MAOC with MMA, EMA, and IBMA were prepared by free radical polymerization.1H, 13C NMR, and FTIR techniques revealed the presence of both monomeric units in the copolymer chain. The monomer reactivity ratios for MAOC-BMA system were calculated from the feed composition and copolymer composition determined by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. The monomer reactivity ratios of MAOC and BMA were computed using Kelen-Tüdös (K-T) and Fineman-Ross (F-R) methods and were found to be r1=0,45,r2=1,29;r1=0.46;r2=1,33, respectively (r1 is monomer reactivity ratio of MAOC). Two monomers have an ideal copolymer tendency because the value of r1·r2 is at around 0,58. In case of poly(MAOC-co-MMA0,19), poly(MAOC-co-EMA0,19), and poly(MAOC-co-IBMA 0,23), initial decomposition temperature of copolymers increased with an increase in the molar fraction of MAOC. Thermogravimetric measurements for copolymers of MAOC-BMA showed that thermal decomposition temperature decreased when BMA percentage was increased. On the other hand, the each polymer blend prepared in this study showed single transition, which can be attributed to poly(MAOC) and poly(BMA) to give the compatible blends. An inner shift of single Tgs for poly(MAOC):poly(BMA) blends indicated good compatibility of both polymers. Dielectric constants of homo- and copolymers were calculated as 100 Hz. It is observed that the dielectric constant decreases sharply up to about 100 Hz after which it decreases very slowly for all the samples. Dielectric constant and dielectric loss factor increased with temperature.



---

*Source: 352759-2012-02-29.xml*