# Ways to Realize the Recessive Educational Function of Green Campus Construction in Colleges and Universities

Authors: Yao Sun
Journal: Mobile Information Systems
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

The construction of green campus in colleges and universities in the new era is an important part of the construction of socialist modern ecological civilization. Therefore, in the process of building a green campus, we should not simply pay attention to “green”, but integrate the ecological civilization into it. In order to further enhance the role of implicit education function in the process of green campus construction, with the help of actual case analysis, this study focuses on how to actively integrate implicit education into the process of building a green campus, and truly give full play to the role of implicit education in building morality, cultivating people and cultural inheritance, starting from three aspects: the realization of the implicit education function, the construction mechanism of green campus environment, and the realization path of implicit ideological and political education in Colleges and universities in the new era.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The report of the 19th Congress of the Communist Party of China comprehensively and in-depth explained the great strategic goal of further advancing the pace of construction and reform of ecological civilization, and with the focus of promoting green growth and building a beautiful China. It shows ways to move the concept forward. In recent years, colleges and universities have been pursuing the concept of sustainable development and conducting a lot of research and experimentation to create a green and ecological campus environment. As the development of green towns intensifies, how to better perform the role of underground education in the development of green towns, as well as the continuous improvement of construction efficiency, has become an important topic in the field of educational research. The study of the implementation of recessive functions is of great practical importance in the training of cultural heritage, and college and university personnel [1].The academy has not yet developed a clear definition of the hidden meaning of hidden ideology and political education. There are four theories of orientation: The first is the definition of resource orientation. Basically, resource-based hidden ideological and political education is an in-depth study of the educational resources contained in other ideological and political theory subjects and in extracurricular activities. Some scholars believe that recessive ideological and political education means that educators use recessive educational resources such as recessive courses as carriers to guide students and enhance students’ awareness, so as to enable students to achieve the overall development of body, mind, and personality. Gao Ming believes that implicit ideological and political education exists on university campuses, such as campus material and humanistic environment. The second is the definition of methodology orientation. Some scholars put forward that “the implicit education method is opposite to the explicit education method, and people can receive education unconsciously with the help of social practice and activities”; It is proposed that “explicit education and implicit education are different ideological and political education methods adopted around the same purpose”. The third is the definition of curriculum orientation. Some scholars believe that “the implicit curriculum, as opposed to the explicit curriculum, is the content of informal education, which is contained in school situations such as school rules and regulations.” Some scholars believe that “Recessive Ideological and political education is a spiritual and cultural activity that focuses on non-intellectual factors such as emotion and will of college students in addition to ideological and political theory courses.” Some scholars pointed out that “the extension of the concept of the curriculum has been expanded, and any culture acquired in school can become a curriculum, resulting in hidden curriculum” [2–4]. The fourth is the definition of practice orientation. Some scholars pointed out that “implicit ideological and political education belongs to non-specific ideological and political education, which is carried out in social practice and is not the focus of educators”.Research on the practice and construction of implicit ideological and political education; some scholars have proposed that implicit ideological and political education should adhere to the concept of people-oriented, close to life, and adhere to the practice criterion of respecting differences [5]. It has played an important role; it is proposed that “the predicament of solving the hidden ideological and political education in colleges and universities lies in realizing scientific cognition, strengthening the innovation of methods and strengthening the development of educational resources”. The practice of hidden ideological and political education, one is to make full use of the on-campus resources. Pay attention to teachers’ words and deeds to students, and pay attention to the impact of the campus environment on students. Second, pay attention to social practice and field inspection, and make proper use of social resources. Third, focus on using family resources. Fourth, effectively use network resources. Ideological and political workers must Master the law of new media communication and make good use of the main position of the campus network.


## 2. Current Situation of Hidden Ideological and Political Education in Colleges and Universities in the Process of Green Campus Construction

### 2.1. Analysis of Implicit Ideological and Political Education Questionnaire

A detailed and in-depth investigation was conducted to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the practical application of hidden ideology and political education in universities, and to gain a realistic and comprehensive understanding of the real progress of hidden ideology and political education conducted with college students as an object of investigation [6]. With the help of questionnaires, the current state of hidden ideological and political education in colleges and universities is analyzed, and the level of acceptance and practical application of college students’ understanding of hidden ideological and political education is known. Based on the principles of objectivity and impartiality, the questionnaire is designed and distributed randomly according to the function law of implicit ideological and political education and the formation law of educatees’ knowledge, emotion, faith, behavior, and other ideological and moral characters. In order to ensure the authenticity and reliability of the questionnaire data, this study investigated 10 colleges and universities in Hangzhou, including undergraduate colleges and junior colleges. A total of 500 questionnaires were distributed in the sample, including comprehensive universities, universities of arts, and universities of finance and economics, 480 of which were effectively restored, to some extent representing a 96% effectiveness [7].There are 480 valid questionnaires collected this time. Most of the respondents are undergraduates, accounting for 85.3%, postgraduates and above accounting for 14.7%, boys accounting for 48.2%, and girls accounting for 51.8%. Among the surveyed majors, liberal arts accounted for 65.3%, science 19.2%, and engineering 15.5%, including economics, law, management, engineering, literature, education, art, and other disciplines. The basic information of the above respondents is generally in line with the current situation of college students, and has great credibility [8].


### 2.2. Analysis of Questionnaire Results

#### 2.2.1. College Students’ Understanding and Experience of Implicit Ideological and Political Education

When asked “are you interested in the content of Ideological and political education in your school?” Some students expressed low interest. When asked “do you think the ideological and political education in your school has an impact on the formation of your values?”, 15.71% of the students thought it had an important influence, 71.82% of the students thought it had partial influence, and 12.47% of the students thought it had no influence (as shown in Figure1). Through the cross analysis of students’ interest in the content of Ideological and political education and their impact on the formation of values, it can be seen that college students’ interest in the content of Ideological and political education is closely related to their impact on the formation of values.Figure 1
Cross table of college students’ interest in the content of ideological and political education and their influence on the formation of values.When asked about the influence of teachers of Ideological and political education theory courses, teachers of professional courses and general education courses, counselors and class teachers, outstanding student pacesetters, Party members around them, moral models and figures of the year who moved China on the formation of their own values (as shown in Figure2), 15.46% of college students said that teachers of Ideological and political theory courses had a great impact on the formation of their own values. Its influence is second only to the moral model and the person of the year who moved China. Teachers of professional courses, general education courses, counselors and class teachers also have a great impact on the formation of College Students’ values. When asked how satisfied you are with the ideological and political education carried out by your school with the help of the above figures, only 6.71% of the college students expressed great satisfaction, 18.21% of the college students expressed satisfaction, 40.42% of the college students expressed average, 29.13% of the college students expressed dissatisfaction, and 5.52% of the College students expressed dissatisfaction. The above data show that although most college students believe that these figures have a certain impact on the formation of their own values, only about one-quarter of college students say that they are “satisfied” with the ideological and political education of the above figures, and even about 35% of college students are “not very satisfied” and “not satisfied” [9].Figure 2
The influence of each character on the formation of their own values.


#### 2.2.2. On the Implementation Path of Recessive Ideological and Political Education in Colleges and Universities

When asked how colleges and universities conduct ideological and political education in addition to theoretical courses in ideological and political education, 48.60% of college students answered that they are professional and general subjects (shown in Figure3). Their colleges and universities do not include ideological and political education. Among them, about 10 percent of college students said that colleges and universities do not provide ideological and political education through campus cultural environment, practical activities, and online platforms.Figure 3
Education methods of ideological and political education in colleges and universities.Cross-analysis was made between the majors of the interviewed students and the ideological and political education carried out by their schools through the teaching of specialized courses and general courses (as shown in Figure4). More students receive ideological and political education in the teaching of knowledge courses, and fewer students who are partial to science and engineering majors in economics, science, and engineering receive ideological and political education in the teaching of specialized courses and general courses [10, 11]. The proportion of college students who have received ideological and political education in professional and general courses is much lower than the proportion of students who have not received ideological and political education. This shows that the work of infiltrating ideological and political education in professional and general courses in colleges and universities needs to be improved, and ideological and political courses have a long way to go.Figure 4
Majors of college students and ideological and political education through professional courses and general education courses.When asked “do you think it is necessary for teachers of professional courses and general education courses to involve the content of Ideological and political education in the classroom?”, up to 61.08% of college students think it is necessary. When asked “what is your impression of the campus cultural activities held by your school?” (as shown in Figure5), only 29% of college students said that campus cultural activities were rich and colorful, 59% of college students said that campus cultural activities were average, 4% of college students said that they were boring, and 8% of college students said that they did not participate in campus cultural activities [12, 13].Figure 5
Impression of college students on campus cultural activities held by their school.When asked “which of the following campus culture embodies the idea of implicit ideological and political education, which do you think is more acceptable to you? (multiple choices are allowed)” (as shown in Figure6), more than 60% of college students are easy to accept the ideological and political education contained in “Scholarly Campus construction” and “enriching campus cultural walls and cultural corridors”. About 50% of college students are easy to accept the implicit ideological and political education ideas embodied in campus culture such as “planting flowers and trees with moral value”, “organizing visits to the school history exhibition hall”, “community activities”, and about 40% of college students are easy to accept the implicit ideological and Political Education ideas embodied in campus culture such as “establishing celebrity sculptures” and “establishing campus rules and regulations” [14].Figure 6
College students’ acceptance of implicit ideological and political education reflected in campus culture.As shown in Figure7, 74.53% of the college students mainly participate in practical activities such as special lectures, and 52.8% of the college students mainly participate in voluntary service, with rich types of activities. However, it can also be seen from the data that nearly 10% of college students have never participated in practical activities related to ideological and political education. When asked “how satisfied are you with the content of Ideological and political education infiltrated by social practice activities in your school?” 7.31% of the college students were very satisfied, 16.45% were satisfied, 48.34% were average, 15.41% were not very satisfied, and 12.49% were not satisfied. In view of the low frequency of practical activities organized by colleges and universities inside and outside the school [15, 16].Figure 7
Ideological and political practice activities participated by college students.Cross analysis (Figure8) shows that 16.71% of college students think “yes and many”, 71.67% think “yes and few”, and 11.61% think No. When asked “do you learn more knowledge through mobile client, which is helpful for your personal growth?”, 7.93% of college students think it is very helpful, 48.16% think it is helpful, 40.79% think it is a little helpful, and only 3.12% think it is not helpful [17].Figure 8
The formation or change of some ways of thinking or behavior habits comes from the power of the network platform and its contribution to personal growth.


## 2.1. Analysis of Implicit Ideological and Political Education Questionnaire

A detailed and in-depth investigation was conducted to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the practical application of hidden ideology and political education in universities, and to gain a realistic and comprehensive understanding of the real progress of hidden ideology and political education conducted with college students as an object of investigation [6]. With the help of questionnaires, the current state of hidden ideological and political education in colleges and universities is analyzed, and the level of acceptance and practical application of college students’ understanding of hidden ideological and political education is known. Based on the principles of objectivity and impartiality, the questionnaire is designed and distributed randomly according to the function law of implicit ideological and political education and the formation law of educatees’ knowledge, emotion, faith, behavior, and other ideological and moral characters. In order to ensure the authenticity and reliability of the questionnaire data, this study investigated 10 colleges and universities in Hangzhou, including undergraduate colleges and junior colleges. A total of 500 questionnaires were distributed in the sample, including comprehensive universities, universities of arts, and universities of finance and economics, 480 of which were effectively restored, to some extent representing a 96% effectiveness [7].There are 480 valid questionnaires collected this time. Most of the respondents are undergraduates, accounting for 85.3%, postgraduates and above accounting for 14.7%, boys accounting for 48.2%, and girls accounting for 51.8%. Among the surveyed majors, liberal arts accounted for 65.3%, science 19.2%, and engineering 15.5%, including economics, law, management, engineering, literature, education, art, and other disciplines. The basic information of the above respondents is generally in line with the current situation of college students, and has great credibility [8].


## 2.2. Analysis of Questionnaire Results

### 2.2.1. College Students’ Understanding and Experience of Implicit Ideological and Political Education

When asked “are you interested in the content of Ideological and political education in your school?” Some students expressed low interest. When asked “do you think the ideological and political education in your school has an impact on the formation of your values?”, 15.71% of the students thought it had an important influence, 71.82% of the students thought it had partial influence, and 12.47% of the students thought it had no influence (as shown in Figure1). Through the cross analysis of students’ interest in the content of Ideological and political education and their impact on the formation of values, it can be seen that college students’ interest in the content of Ideological and political education is closely related to their impact on the formation of values.Figure 1
Cross table of college students’ interest in the content of ideological and political education and their influence on the formation of values.When asked about the influence of teachers of Ideological and political education theory courses, teachers of professional courses and general education courses, counselors and class teachers, outstanding student pacesetters, Party members around them, moral models and figures of the year who moved China on the formation of their own values (as shown in Figure2), 15.46% of college students said that teachers of Ideological and political theory courses had a great impact on the formation of their own values. Its influence is second only to the moral model and the person of the year who moved China. Teachers of professional courses, general education courses, counselors and class teachers also have a great impact on the formation of College Students’ values. When asked how satisfied you are with the ideological and political education carried out by your school with the help of the above figures, only 6.71% of the college students expressed great satisfaction, 18.21% of the college students expressed satisfaction, 40.42% of the college students expressed average, 29.13% of the college students expressed dissatisfaction, and 5.52% of the College students expressed dissatisfaction. The above data show that although most college students believe that these figures have a certain impact on the formation of their own values, only about one-quarter of college students say that they are “satisfied” with the ideological and political education of the above figures, and even about 35% of college students are “not very satisfied” and “not satisfied” [9].Figure 2
The influence of each character on the formation of their own values.


### 2.2.2. On the Implementation Path of Recessive Ideological and Political Education in Colleges and Universities

When asked how colleges and universities conduct ideological and political education in addition to theoretical courses in ideological and political education, 48.60% of college students answered that they are professional and general subjects (shown in Figure3). Their colleges and universities do not include ideological and political education. Among them, about 10 percent of college students said that colleges and universities do not provide ideological and political education through campus cultural environment, practical activities, and online platforms.Figure 3
Education methods of ideological and political education in colleges and universities.Cross-analysis was made between the majors of the interviewed students and the ideological and political education carried out by their schools through the teaching of specialized courses and general courses (as shown in Figure4). More students receive ideological and political education in the teaching of knowledge courses, and fewer students who are partial to science and engineering majors in economics, science, and engineering receive ideological and political education in the teaching of specialized courses and general courses [10, 11]. The proportion of college students who have received ideological and political education in professional and general courses is much lower than the proportion of students who have not received ideological and political education. This shows that the work of infiltrating ideological and political education in professional and general courses in colleges and universities needs to be improved, and ideological and political courses have a long way to go.Figure 4
Majors of college students and ideological and political education through professional courses and general education courses.When asked “do you think it is necessary for teachers of professional courses and general education courses to involve the content of Ideological and political education in the classroom?”, up to 61.08% of college students think it is necessary. When asked “what is your impression of the campus cultural activities held by your school?” (as shown in Figure5), only 29% of college students said that campus cultural activities were rich and colorful, 59% of college students said that campus cultural activities were average, 4% of college students said that they were boring, and 8% of college students said that they did not participate in campus cultural activities [12, 13].Figure 5
Impression of college students on campus cultural activities held by their school.When asked “which of the following campus culture embodies the idea of implicit ideological and political education, which do you think is more acceptable to you? (multiple choices are allowed)” (as shown in Figure6), more than 60% of college students are easy to accept the ideological and political education contained in “Scholarly Campus construction” and “enriching campus cultural walls and cultural corridors”. About 50% of college students are easy to accept the implicit ideological and political education ideas embodied in campus culture such as “planting flowers and trees with moral value”, “organizing visits to the school history exhibition hall”, “community activities”, and about 40% of college students are easy to accept the implicit ideological and Political Education ideas embodied in campus culture such as “establishing celebrity sculptures” and “establishing campus rules and regulations” [14].Figure 6
College students’ acceptance of implicit ideological and political education reflected in campus culture.As shown in Figure7, 74.53% of the college students mainly participate in practical activities such as special lectures, and 52.8% of the college students mainly participate in voluntary service, with rich types of activities. However, it can also be seen from the data that nearly 10% of college students have never participated in practical activities related to ideological and political education. When asked “how satisfied are you with the content of Ideological and political education infiltrated by social practice activities in your school?” 7.31% of the college students were very satisfied, 16.45% were satisfied, 48.34% were average, 15.41% were not very satisfied, and 12.49% were not satisfied. In view of the low frequency of practical activities organized by colleges and universities inside and outside the school [15, 16].Figure 7
Ideological and political practice activities participated by college students.Cross analysis (Figure8) shows that 16.71% of college students think “yes and many”, 71.67% think “yes and few”, and 11.61% think No. When asked “do you learn more knowledge through mobile client, which is helpful for your personal growth?”, 7.93% of college students think it is very helpful, 48.16% think it is helpful, 40.79% think it is a little helpful, and only 3.12% think it is not helpful [17].Figure 8
The formation or change of some ways of thinking or behavior habits comes from the power of the network platform and its contribution to personal growth.


## 2.2.1. College Students’ Understanding and Experience of Implicit Ideological and Political Education

When asked “are you interested in the content of Ideological and political education in your school?” Some students expressed low interest. When asked “do you think the ideological and political education in your school has an impact on the formation of your values?”, 15.71% of the students thought it had an important influence, 71.82% of the students thought it had partial influence, and 12.47% of the students thought it had no influence (as shown in Figure1). Through the cross analysis of students’ interest in the content of Ideological and political education and their impact on the formation of values, it can be seen that college students’ interest in the content of Ideological and political education is closely related to their impact on the formation of values.Figure 1
Cross table of college students’ interest in the content of ideological and political education and their influence on the formation of values.When asked about the influence of teachers of Ideological and political education theory courses, teachers of professional courses and general education courses, counselors and class teachers, outstanding student pacesetters, Party members around them, moral models and figures of the year who moved China on the formation of their own values (as shown in Figure2), 15.46% of college students said that teachers of Ideological and political theory courses had a great impact on the formation of their own values. Its influence is second only to the moral model and the person of the year who moved China. Teachers of professional courses, general education courses, counselors and class teachers also have a great impact on the formation of College Students’ values. When asked how satisfied you are with the ideological and political education carried out by your school with the help of the above figures, only 6.71% of the college students expressed great satisfaction, 18.21% of the college students expressed satisfaction, 40.42% of the college students expressed average, 29.13% of the college students expressed dissatisfaction, and 5.52% of the College students expressed dissatisfaction. The above data show that although most college students believe that these figures have a certain impact on the formation of their own values, only about one-quarter of college students say that they are “satisfied” with the ideological and political education of the above figures, and even about 35% of college students are “not very satisfied” and “not satisfied” [9].Figure 2
The influence of each character on the formation of their own values.


## 2.2.2. On the Implementation Path of Recessive Ideological and Political Education in Colleges and Universities

When asked how colleges and universities conduct ideological and political education in addition to theoretical courses in ideological and political education, 48.60% of college students answered that they are professional and general subjects (shown in Figure3). Their colleges and universities do not include ideological and political education. Among them, about 10 percent of college students said that colleges and universities do not provide ideological and political education through campus cultural environment, practical activities, and online platforms.Figure 3
Education methods of ideological and political education in colleges and universities.Cross-analysis was made between the majors of the interviewed students and the ideological and political education carried out by their schools through the teaching of specialized courses and general courses (as shown in Figure4). More students receive ideological and political education in the teaching of knowledge courses, and fewer students who are partial to science and engineering majors in economics, science, and engineering receive ideological and political education in the teaching of specialized courses and general courses [10, 11]. The proportion of college students who have received ideological and political education in professional and general courses is much lower than the proportion of students who have not received ideological and political education. This shows that the work of infiltrating ideological and political education in professional and general courses in colleges and universities needs to be improved, and ideological and political courses have a long way to go.Figure 4
Majors of college students and ideological and political education through professional courses and general education courses.When asked “do you think it is necessary for teachers of professional courses and general education courses to involve the content of Ideological and political education in the classroom?”, up to 61.08% of college students think it is necessary. When asked “what is your impression of the campus cultural activities held by your school?” (as shown in Figure5), only 29% of college students said that campus cultural activities were rich and colorful, 59% of college students said that campus cultural activities were average, 4% of college students said that they were boring, and 8% of college students said that they did not participate in campus cultural activities [12, 13].Figure 5
Impression of college students on campus cultural activities held by their school.When asked “which of the following campus culture embodies the idea of implicit ideological and political education, which do you think is more acceptable to you? (multiple choices are allowed)” (as shown in Figure6), more than 60% of college students are easy to accept the ideological and political education contained in “Scholarly Campus construction” and “enriching campus cultural walls and cultural corridors”. About 50% of college students are easy to accept the implicit ideological and political education ideas embodied in campus culture such as “planting flowers and trees with moral value”, “organizing visits to the school history exhibition hall”, “community activities”, and about 40% of college students are easy to accept the implicit ideological and Political Education ideas embodied in campus culture such as “establishing celebrity sculptures” and “establishing campus rules and regulations” [14].Figure 6
College students’ acceptance of implicit ideological and political education reflected in campus culture.As shown in Figure7, 74.53% of the college students mainly participate in practical activities such as special lectures, and 52.8% of the college students mainly participate in voluntary service, with rich types of activities. However, it can also be seen from the data that nearly 10% of college students have never participated in practical activities related to ideological and political education. When asked “how satisfied are you with the content of Ideological and political education infiltrated by social practice activities in your school?” 7.31% of the college students were very satisfied, 16.45% were satisfied, 48.34% were average, 15.41% were not very satisfied, and 12.49% were not satisfied. In view of the low frequency of practical activities organized by colleges and universities inside and outside the school [15, 16].Figure 7
Ideological and political practice activities participated by college students.Cross analysis (Figure8) shows that 16.71% of college students think “yes and many”, 71.67% think “yes and few”, and 11.61% think No. When asked “do you learn more knowledge through mobile client, which is helpful for your personal growth?”, 7.93% of college students think it is very helpful, 48.16% think it is helpful, 40.79% think it is a little helpful, and only 3.12% think it is not helpful [17].Figure 8
The formation or change of some ways of thinking or behavior habits comes from the power of the network platform and its contribution to personal growth.


## 3. Function Mechanism and Realization Path of Implicit Education Function in Green Campus Landscape Construction

### 3.1. Function Mechanism of Implicit Educational Function of Campus Landscape

There are primary and secondary aspects of campus landscape in school construction. Exploring the implicit educational function of landscape and promoting campus landscape culture education can be divided into subject and object. For the construction of campus landscape, the builders are the main body and the campus landscape is the object. For the implicit educational function of campus landscape, the campus landscape culture is the main body, and the educated students are the object. For the latter, the information existing in the subject acts on the teachers and students of the school through various display forms. Teachers and students either actively or passively feel and absorb the nutrition brought by the landscape culture, and get education from it. There is a phenomenon of behavior cut in between two subjects and two objects, which is divided into two stages. First, for the builders and the subject and object of landscape construction, the cut-in of educational behavior is to integrate cultural factors into landscape design, construction and shaping, and cultural factors are internalized into landscape culture. Then, for the campus culture and the subject and object of students, the cut in of educational behavior lies in the process that students contact the campus landscape and receive education [18]. The second stage is the process of showing the mechanism of the implicit educational function of the landscape: the potential function guides, inspires, intervenes, and promotes the educatees through the educational mechanism and means, and adopts appropriate educational methods, so that the educatees’ passive cognition evolves into active cognition. (see Figure 9).Figure 9
Function mechanism of implicit education function of campus environment landscape culture.The three sections of manifestation of environmental landscape: modeling, orientation, materials, etc; Images, drawings, curves, colors, and words; Planning and design, abstract artistic conception, cultural connotation, etc. The gradual order of the subject’s understanding of the object: observation (appreciation)—Enlightenment (comprehension)—promotion (Education).


### 3.2. Operating Mechanism of Implicit Educational Function of Campus Landscape Construction

In order to achieve the educational objectives and complete the national educational tasks, the school strives to adopt the best comprehensive education method to achieve the teaching objectives. The school is not satisfied that the students have been in the primary stage of consciously understanding things. It will adopt various measures and means to influence the students and promote the students to have the initiative to understand things. Therefore, constructing the corresponding education mechanism and adopting certain educational measures to strengthen the encouragement, inspiration, and guidance of students are the inevitable choice to carry out the recessive education of the campus landscape and give full play to its functions.The purpose of constructing the recessive education mechanism is to intervene in the interaction between the cognitive subject (teachers and students) and the object (campus environment landscape culture), and to integrate the spiritual wealth of the school, such as the educational concept, educational goal and values, into the campus environment landscape, so as to intervene in the interaction between the subject and object. Teachers and students, as the main body of cognition, make self-interest actions in the process of understanding the campus environment and landscape culture, so as to improve themselves and realize their own personal values; At the same time, they consciously make altruistic actions to realize the transformation of individual social values. The main purpose and goal of constructing the operating mechanism of the implicit educational function of the campus landscape are to take measures to solve the problem of the harmonious unity and common development of the individual value orientation and social value orientation of teachers and students’ understanding of the campus environment landscape culture. Therefore, the guiding and initiating measures taken by the school should be set around the main purpose and goal of the operating mechanism (see Figure10). If the measures are appropriate, the operation mechanism constructed will be reasonable and effective. As a result, teachers’ and students’ understanding of the implicit educational role of campus environmental culture will play a significant positive role in realizing the coordinated development of “personal value” and “social value” [19, 20].Figure 10
Operating mechanism of implicit education function of campus environment landscape culture.The manifestation of realizing the personal value of the subject: rich professional knowledge, good ideology and morality, will-power quality, etc.The forms of social value expression of the realization subject: the concept of national education, the goal of school education, and social values.The implicit educational function of campus landscape culture comes into play when the educational concept expressed by campus landscape culture is recognized by students. Under the influence of transcending individual social values, the educated have the power to serve and contribute to the society, and use the amount of social contribution as the judgment standard of campus landscape culture. With the cooperation of the recessive educational function of the campus landscape, the talent training goal of the school can be realized. The school makes use of the recessive educational function of the campus landscape to promote the students to change from self-interest to altruism. It brings the established talent training objectives and various cultural factors into the campus landscape construction, grasps the strength, and actively realizes the influence and control on the educatees’ thoughts and behaviors. This is the operating mechanism of the implicit educational function of campus landscape.


### 3.3. Construction of Value Index System of Campus Landscape Culture Education

#### 3.3.1. Index System

In order to establish a set of scientific and reasonable evaluation index system, based on the theories of campus landscape culture, and referring to the relevant books and literature, combined with the actual situation of university landscape culture, through repeated investigation and revision, 16 evaluation indexes are finally determined. This study uses the analytic hierarchy process to analyze. Based on the feasibility evaluation of the educational value of landscape culture in a university campus, the 16 evaluation indexes are systematically divided into three levels: the first level is the target level, which is the evaluation U of the educational value of landscape culture in the university campus; The second criterion layer is divided into three aspects, namely, recessive educational U1, cultural connotation U2 and cultural level U3; The third layer is the index layer, i.e., the 16 evaluation indexes determined. See Figure11 for details:Figure 11
Index system for evaluation of campus landscape culture education value.


#### 3.3.2. The Calculation Process of the Educational Value of Campus Environment Landscape Culture

As shown in Figure11, the creation of a hierarchical structure helps to determine the relationship between the upper and lower level elements. Assuming that the upper-level Ck element is used as the criterion, it has a predominant relationship with the next level elements A1, …, An, in relative importance [21].First, during a pairwise comparison, the decision maker must repeatedly answer the question of which of the two elements is more important and which is more important for the Ck criterion. There is a need for a clear assessment of how important this is.Second, forn A1, …, An, the pairwise comparison judgment matrix is obtained after pairwise comparison:(1)A=aijn×n.The properties of the judgment matrix are as follows:(2)aij>0,aij=1aij,aij=1.According to the method of pairwise comparison, the implicit educationalU1, cultural connotation U2 and cultural level U3 in the questionnaire are scored according to the degree of importance, which are a、b、c respectively, and then a judgment matrix is created. The rows and columns of the judgment matrix are U1, U2 and U3 respectively. Any element in the judgment matrix is called aij, and:(3)aij=aiaj,where ai is the importance score of indicator Ui; aj is the importance score of index Uj. The matrix table is shown in Table 1:Table 1
Index matrix.
ai/ajU1U2U3U11a/ba/cU2b/a1b/cU3c/ac/b1Since the indicator layers are of the same importance to each other, it is not necessary to conduct pairwise comparison to construct a judgment matrix. Equal weight division is carried out according to the number of indicators in each dimension.Let the maximum eigenvalue of the judgment matrixAn×n be λmax, and the corresponding eigenvector w can be obtained from formula (6):(4)Aw=λmaxw.After normalization, the obtainedw can be regarded as the weight vector of the relative importance of the corresponding elements at the same level to a factor at the upper level. The maximum characteristic root of the judgment matrix An×n is λmax, and its approximate calculation formula is:(5)λmax=∑i=1nAWinWI,where,(6)AW=aWT.Due to the influence of people’s subjective judgment, consistency test must be carried out. The specific steps are as follows:First, calculate the consistency index:(7)C.I.=λmax−nn−1.Second, find the corresponding average random consistency index R.I.Table2 Shows the average random consistency index obtained by 1000 calculations of the positive reciprocal matrix of order 1∼8.Table 2
Average random consistency index R.I.
Matrix order12345678R.I.000.510.881.011.151.251.31Third, calculate the consistency ratio C.R.(8)C.R.=C.I.R.I.,When formula (9) is satisfied, it is considered that the consistency of the judgment matrix is acceptable; When formula (10) is satisfied, the judgment matrix should be properly modified to obtain a new set of weights until the consistency is passed.(9)C.R.<0.1,(10)C.R.≥0.1.Fourth, calculate the final score(11)Score=∑i=1nSi∗Ci,i=1,2,3.


### 3.4. Result Analysis

#### 3.4.1. Analysis onU Comprehensive Score of Educational Value of Campus Environment Landscape Culture

The comprehensive score of the cultural and educational value of the campus environment landscape is about 3.223, which is in the “general” state compared with the evaluation scale table, i.e., Table3. In the first-class factor evaluation, the scores of cultural connotation and cultural level are higher, which are 3.224 and 3.215 respectively, but both are in the “general” state. The recessive educational score of campus environment landscape culture is 3.169, which is also in the “general” state. The scores of the three first-class factors are relatively close, and they are all in the “average” state, but there is still a certain gap compared with the “relatively good” state. As a university campus landscape is under continuous construction, the landscape quality will be greatly improved, and its cultural and educational value will be more prominent. Therefore, in general, the cultural and educational value of a university campus landscape will have greater room for improvement.Table 3
Evaluation scale of educational value of campus environmental landscape culture.
Comprehensive evaluation score S>4.53.5∼4.52.5∼3.51.5∼2.5<1.5Evaluation scaleVery niceQuite goodCommonlyPoorVery poor


#### 3.4.2. Analysis of Hidden Educational U1 Score

In the secondary factor score analysis of recessive educational sub items, the highest score for thought improvement is 3.83, followed by the wide field of vision is 3.37, followed by normative behavior is 3.13, and the lowest score is environmental protection is 2.11. On the whole, the recessive educational function of campus environment landscape culture has a certain impact on people, which makes people who have been to a university campus deeply impressed by it. It has a good cultural quality, and can better reflect the characteristics of culture, People’s implicit euphemism, and the characteristics of eastern culture. However, environmental protection needs to be strengthened, which is weak compared with other items.


#### 3.4.3. U2 Score Analysis of Cultural Connotation

In the sub-item score analysis of secondary factors of cultural connotation, the evaluation scores of ecology and architecture are higher, which are 3.75 and 3.65, followed by literature at 3.55, art at 3.53, biology at 3.37, geography at 3.01, philosophy at 2.85, politics at 2.25, and finally religion at 2.08. The cultural connotation of the campus environment landscape is reflected in all aspects. From the above analysis, it can be seen that the cultural connotation of the campus landscape of a university is mainly reflected in the aspects of ecology, architecture, literature, biology, geography, etc. because a university is donated and built by patriots at home and abroad of the “ Gang”, the political influence in its cultural connotation is small, which can also be seen from the research and analysis. Then art, philosophy, and biological connotation need to be improved and strengthened.


#### 3.4.4. U3 Score Analysis of Cultural Level

In the sub-item score analysis of secondary factors at the cultural level, the highest score of Gang is 3.42, followed by the eastern Zhejiang culture evaluation score of 3.30, and the lowest is the egret culture score of 3.01. From the scores, it can be seen that the cultural hierarchy of the environmental landscape of a university campus focuses on the Gang culture and the eastern Zhejiang culture, which is specifically reflected in the physical embodiment of the architectural structure. The names of the teaching building and the college building are named after the donors, which fully reflects the “Gang” merchant culture and the feelings of patriotism and benefiting Sangzi. At the same time, the roads in the campus are named after historical scholars, such as “Yangming Road,” which reflects the eastern Zhejiang culture. Therefore, the cultural characteristics of the environmental landscape of a university campus are obvious and impressive.


## 3.1. Function Mechanism of Implicit Educational Function of Campus Landscape

There are primary and secondary aspects of campus landscape in school construction. Exploring the implicit educational function of landscape and promoting campus landscape culture education can be divided into subject and object. For the construction of campus landscape, the builders are the main body and the campus landscape is the object. For the implicit educational function of campus landscape, the campus landscape culture is the main body, and the educated students are the object. For the latter, the information existing in the subject acts on the teachers and students of the school through various display forms. Teachers and students either actively or passively feel and absorb the nutrition brought by the landscape culture, and get education from it. There is a phenomenon of behavior cut in between two subjects and two objects, which is divided into two stages. First, for the builders and the subject and object of landscape construction, the cut-in of educational behavior is to integrate cultural factors into landscape design, construction and shaping, and cultural factors are internalized into landscape culture. Then, for the campus culture and the subject and object of students, the cut in of educational behavior lies in the process that students contact the campus landscape and receive education [18]. The second stage is the process of showing the mechanism of the implicit educational function of the landscape: the potential function guides, inspires, intervenes, and promotes the educatees through the educational mechanism and means, and adopts appropriate educational methods, so that the educatees’ passive cognition evolves into active cognition. (see Figure 9).Figure 9
Function mechanism of implicit education function of campus environment landscape culture.The three sections of manifestation of environmental landscape: modeling, orientation, materials, etc; Images, drawings, curves, colors, and words; Planning and design, abstract artistic conception, cultural connotation, etc. The gradual order of the subject’s understanding of the object: observation (appreciation)—Enlightenment (comprehension)—promotion (Education).


## 3.2. Operating Mechanism of Implicit Educational Function of Campus Landscape Construction

In order to achieve the educational objectives and complete the national educational tasks, the school strives to adopt the best comprehensive education method to achieve the teaching objectives. The school is not satisfied that the students have been in the primary stage of consciously understanding things. It will adopt various measures and means to influence the students and promote the students to have the initiative to understand things. Therefore, constructing the corresponding education mechanism and adopting certain educational measures to strengthen the encouragement, inspiration, and guidance of students are the inevitable choice to carry out the recessive education of the campus landscape and give full play to its functions.The purpose of constructing the recessive education mechanism is to intervene in the interaction between the cognitive subject (teachers and students) and the object (campus environment landscape culture), and to integrate the spiritual wealth of the school, such as the educational concept, educational goal and values, into the campus environment landscape, so as to intervene in the interaction between the subject and object. Teachers and students, as the main body of cognition, make self-interest actions in the process of understanding the campus environment and landscape culture, so as to improve themselves and realize their own personal values; At the same time, they consciously make altruistic actions to realize the transformation of individual social values. The main purpose and goal of constructing the operating mechanism of the implicit educational function of the campus landscape are to take measures to solve the problem of the harmonious unity and common development of the individual value orientation and social value orientation of teachers and students’ understanding of the campus environment landscape culture. Therefore, the guiding and initiating measures taken by the school should be set around the main purpose and goal of the operating mechanism (see Figure10). If the measures are appropriate, the operation mechanism constructed will be reasonable and effective. As a result, teachers’ and students’ understanding of the implicit educational role of campus environmental culture will play a significant positive role in realizing the coordinated development of “personal value” and “social value” [19, 20].Figure 10
Operating mechanism of implicit education function of campus environment landscape culture.The manifestation of realizing the personal value of the subject: rich professional knowledge, good ideology and morality, will-power quality, etc.The forms of social value expression of the realization subject: the concept of national education, the goal of school education, and social values.The implicit educational function of campus landscape culture comes into play when the educational concept expressed by campus landscape culture is recognized by students. Under the influence of transcending individual social values, the educated have the power to serve and contribute to the society, and use the amount of social contribution as the judgment standard of campus landscape culture. With the cooperation of the recessive educational function of the campus landscape, the talent training goal of the school can be realized. The school makes use of the recessive educational function of the campus landscape to promote the students to change from self-interest to altruism. It brings the established talent training objectives and various cultural factors into the campus landscape construction, grasps the strength, and actively realizes the influence and control on the educatees’ thoughts and behaviors. This is the operating mechanism of the implicit educational function of campus landscape.


## 3.3. Construction of Value Index System of Campus Landscape Culture Education

### 3.3.1. Index System

In order to establish a set of scientific and reasonable evaluation index system, based on the theories of campus landscape culture, and referring to the relevant books and literature, combined with the actual situation of university landscape culture, through repeated investigation and revision, 16 evaluation indexes are finally determined. This study uses the analytic hierarchy process to analyze. Based on the feasibility evaluation of the educational value of landscape culture in a university campus, the 16 evaluation indexes are systematically divided into three levels: the first level is the target level, which is the evaluation U of the educational value of landscape culture in the university campus; The second criterion layer is divided into three aspects, namely, recessive educational U1, cultural connotation U2 and cultural level U3; The third layer is the index layer, i.e., the 16 evaluation indexes determined. See Figure11 for details:Figure 11
Index system for evaluation of campus landscape culture education value.


### 3.3.2. The Calculation Process of the Educational Value of Campus Environment Landscape Culture

As shown in Figure11, the creation of a hierarchical structure helps to determine the relationship between the upper and lower level elements. Assuming that the upper-level Ck element is used as the criterion, it has a predominant relationship with the next level elements A1, …, An, in relative importance [21].First, during a pairwise comparison, the decision maker must repeatedly answer the question of which of the two elements is more important and which is more important for the Ck criterion. There is a need for a clear assessment of how important this is.Second, forn A1, …, An, the pairwise comparison judgment matrix is obtained after pairwise comparison:(1)A=aijn×n.The properties of the judgment matrix are as follows:(2)aij>0,aij=1aij,aij=1.According to the method of pairwise comparison, the implicit educationalU1, cultural connotation U2 and cultural level U3 in the questionnaire are scored according to the degree of importance, which are a、b、c respectively, and then a judgment matrix is created. The rows and columns of the judgment matrix are U1, U2 and U3 respectively. Any element in the judgment matrix is called aij, and:(3)aij=aiaj,where ai is the importance score of indicator Ui; aj is the importance score of index Uj. The matrix table is shown in Table 1:Table 1
Index matrix.
ai/ajU1U2U3U11a/ba/cU2b/a1b/cU3c/ac/b1Since the indicator layers are of the same importance to each other, it is not necessary to conduct pairwise comparison to construct a judgment matrix. Equal weight division is carried out according to the number of indicators in each dimension.Let the maximum eigenvalue of the judgment matrixAn×n be λmax, and the corresponding eigenvector w can be obtained from formula (6):(4)Aw=λmaxw.After normalization, the obtainedw can be regarded as the weight vector of the relative importance of the corresponding elements at the same level to a factor at the upper level. The maximum characteristic root of the judgment matrix An×n is λmax, and its approximate calculation formula is:(5)λmax=∑i=1nAWinWI,where,(6)AW=aWT.Due to the influence of people’s subjective judgment, consistency test must be carried out. The specific steps are as follows:First, calculate the consistency index:(7)C.I.=λmax−nn−1.Second, find the corresponding average random consistency index R.I.Table2 Shows the average random consistency index obtained by 1000 calculations of the positive reciprocal matrix of order 1∼8.Table 2
Average random consistency index R.I.
Matrix order12345678R.I.000.510.881.011.151.251.31Third, calculate the consistency ratio C.R.(8)C.R.=C.I.R.I.,When formula (9) is satisfied, it is considered that the consistency of the judgment matrix is acceptable; When formula (10) is satisfied, the judgment matrix should be properly modified to obtain a new set of weights until the consistency is passed.(9)C.R.<0.1,(10)C.R.≥0.1.Fourth, calculate the final score(11)Score=∑i=1nSi∗Ci,i=1,2,3.


## 3.3.1. Index System

In order to establish a set of scientific and reasonable evaluation index system, based on the theories of campus landscape culture, and referring to the relevant books and literature, combined with the actual situation of university landscape culture, through repeated investigation and revision, 16 evaluation indexes are finally determined. This study uses the analytic hierarchy process to analyze. Based on the feasibility evaluation of the educational value of landscape culture in a university campus, the 16 evaluation indexes are systematically divided into three levels: the first level is the target level, which is the evaluation U of the educational value of landscape culture in the university campus; The second criterion layer is divided into three aspects, namely, recessive educational U1, cultural connotation U2 and cultural level U3; The third layer is the index layer, i.e., the 16 evaluation indexes determined. See Figure11 for details:Figure 11
Index system for evaluation of campus landscape culture education value.


## 3.3.2. The Calculation Process of the Educational Value of Campus Environment Landscape Culture

As shown in Figure11, the creation of a hierarchical structure helps to determine the relationship between the upper and lower level elements. Assuming that the upper-level Ck element is used as the criterion, it has a predominant relationship with the next level elements A1, …, An, in relative importance [21].First, during a pairwise comparison, the decision maker must repeatedly answer the question of which of the two elements is more important and which is more important for the Ck criterion. There is a need for a clear assessment of how important this is.Second, forn A1, …, An, the pairwise comparison judgment matrix is obtained after pairwise comparison:(1)A=aijn×n.The properties of the judgment matrix are as follows:(2)aij>0,aij=1aij,aij=1.According to the method of pairwise comparison, the implicit educationalU1, cultural connotation U2 and cultural level U3 in the questionnaire are scored according to the degree of importance, which are a、b、c respectively, and then a judgment matrix is created. The rows and columns of the judgment matrix are U1, U2 and U3 respectively. Any element in the judgment matrix is called aij, and:(3)aij=aiaj,where ai is the importance score of indicator Ui; aj is the importance score of index Uj. The matrix table is shown in Table 1:Table 1
Index matrix.
ai/ajU1U2U3U11a/ba/cU2b/a1b/cU3c/ac/b1Since the indicator layers are of the same importance to each other, it is not necessary to conduct pairwise comparison to construct a judgment matrix. Equal weight division is carried out according to the number of indicators in each dimension.Let the maximum eigenvalue of the judgment matrixAn×n be λmax, and the corresponding eigenvector w can be obtained from formula (6):(4)Aw=λmaxw.After normalization, the obtainedw can be regarded as the weight vector of the relative importance of the corresponding elements at the same level to a factor at the upper level. The maximum characteristic root of the judgment matrix An×n is λmax, and its approximate calculation formula is:(5)λmax=∑i=1nAWinWI,where,(6)AW=aWT.Due to the influence of people’s subjective judgment, consistency test must be carried out. The specific steps are as follows:First, calculate the consistency index:(7)C.I.=λmax−nn−1.Second, find the corresponding average random consistency index R.I.Table2 Shows the average random consistency index obtained by 1000 calculations of the positive reciprocal matrix of order 1∼8.Table 2
Average random consistency index R.I.
Matrix order12345678R.I.000.510.881.011.151.251.31Third, calculate the consistency ratio C.R.(8)C.R.=C.I.R.I.,When formula (9) is satisfied, it is considered that the consistency of the judgment matrix is acceptable; When formula (10) is satisfied, the judgment matrix should be properly modified to obtain a new set of weights until the consistency is passed.(9)C.R.<0.1,(10)C.R.≥0.1.Fourth, calculate the final score(11)Score=∑i=1nSi∗Ci,i=1,2,3.


## 3.4. Result Analysis

### 3.4.1. Analysis onU Comprehensive Score of Educational Value of Campus Environment Landscape Culture

The comprehensive score of the cultural and educational value of the campus environment landscape is about 3.223, which is in the “general” state compared with the evaluation scale table, i.e., Table3. In the first-class factor evaluation, the scores of cultural connotation and cultural level are higher, which are 3.224 and 3.215 respectively, but both are in the “general” state. The recessive educational score of campus environment landscape culture is 3.169, which is also in the “general” state. The scores of the three first-class factors are relatively close, and they are all in the “average” state, but there is still a certain gap compared with the “relatively good” state. As a university campus landscape is under continuous construction, the landscape quality will be greatly improved, and its cultural and educational value will be more prominent. Therefore, in general, the cultural and educational value of a university campus landscape will have greater room for improvement.Table 3
Evaluation scale of educational value of campus environmental landscape culture.
Comprehensive evaluation score S>4.53.5∼4.52.5∼3.51.5∼2.5<1.5Evaluation scaleVery niceQuite goodCommonlyPoorVery poor


### 3.4.2. Analysis of Hidden Educational U1 Score

In the secondary factor score analysis of recessive educational sub items, the highest score for thought improvement is 3.83, followed by the wide field of vision is 3.37, followed by normative behavior is 3.13, and the lowest score is environmental protection is 2.11. On the whole, the recessive educational function of campus environment landscape culture has a certain impact on people, which makes people who have been to a university campus deeply impressed by it. It has a good cultural quality, and can better reflect the characteristics of culture, People’s implicit euphemism, and the characteristics of eastern culture. However, environmental protection needs to be strengthened, which is weak compared with other items.


### 3.4.3. U2 Score Analysis of Cultural Connotation

In the sub-item score analysis of secondary factors of cultural connotation, the evaluation scores of ecology and architecture are higher, which are 3.75 and 3.65, followed by literature at 3.55, art at 3.53, biology at 3.37, geography at 3.01, philosophy at 2.85, politics at 2.25, and finally religion at 2.08. The cultural connotation of the campus environment landscape is reflected in all aspects. From the above analysis, it can be seen that the cultural connotation of the campus landscape of a university is mainly reflected in the aspects of ecology, architecture, literature, biology, geography, etc. because a university is donated and built by patriots at home and abroad of the “ Gang”, the political influence in its cultural connotation is small, which can also be seen from the research and analysis. Then art, philosophy, and biological connotation need to be improved and strengthened.


### 3.4.4. U3 Score Analysis of Cultural Level

In the sub-item score analysis of secondary factors at the cultural level, the highest score of Gang is 3.42, followed by the eastern Zhejiang culture evaluation score of 3.30, and the lowest is the egret culture score of 3.01. From the scores, it can be seen that the cultural hierarchy of the environmental landscape of a university campus focuses on the Gang culture and the eastern Zhejiang culture, which is specifically reflected in the physical embodiment of the architectural structure. The names of the teaching building and the college building are named after the donors, which fully reflects the “Gang” merchant culture and the feelings of patriotism and benefiting Sangzi. At the same time, the roads in the campus are named after historical scholars, such as “Yangming Road,” which reflects the eastern Zhejiang culture. Therefore, the cultural characteristics of the environmental landscape of a university campus are obvious and impressive.


## 3.4.1. Analysis onU Comprehensive Score of Educational Value of Campus Environment Landscape Culture

The comprehensive score of the cultural and educational value of the campus environment landscape is about 3.223, which is in the “general” state compared with the evaluation scale table, i.e., Table3. In the first-class factor evaluation, the scores of cultural connotation and cultural level are higher, which are 3.224 and 3.215 respectively, but both are in the “general” state. The recessive educational score of campus environment landscape culture is 3.169, which is also in the “general” state. The scores of the three first-class factors are relatively close, and they are all in the “average” state, but there is still a certain gap compared with the “relatively good” state. As a university campus landscape is under continuous construction, the landscape quality will be greatly improved, and its cultural and educational value will be more prominent. Therefore, in general, the cultural and educational value of a university campus landscape will have greater room for improvement.Table 3
Evaluation scale of educational value of campus environmental landscape culture.
Comprehensive evaluation score S>4.53.5∼4.52.5∼3.51.5∼2.5<1.5Evaluation scaleVery niceQuite goodCommonlyPoorVery poor


## 3.4.2. Analysis of Hidden Educational U1 Score

In the secondary factor score analysis of recessive educational sub items, the highest score for thought improvement is 3.83, followed by the wide field of vision is 3.37, followed by normative behavior is 3.13, and the lowest score is environmental protection is 2.11. On the whole, the recessive educational function of campus environment landscape culture has a certain impact on people, which makes people who have been to a university campus deeply impressed by it. It has a good cultural quality, and can better reflect the characteristics of culture, People’s implicit euphemism, and the characteristics of eastern culture. However, environmental protection needs to be strengthened, which is weak compared with other items.


## 3.4.3. U2 Score Analysis of Cultural Connotation

In the sub-item score analysis of secondary factors of cultural connotation, the evaluation scores of ecology and architecture are higher, which are 3.75 and 3.65, followed by literature at 3.55, art at 3.53, biology at 3.37, geography at 3.01, philosophy at 2.85, politics at 2.25, and finally religion at 2.08. The cultural connotation of the campus environment landscape is reflected in all aspects. From the above analysis, it can be seen that the cultural connotation of the campus landscape of a university is mainly reflected in the aspects of ecology, architecture, literature, biology, geography, etc. because a university is donated and built by patriots at home and abroad of the “ Gang”, the political influence in its cultural connotation is small, which can also be seen from the research and analysis. Then art, philosophy, and biological connotation need to be improved and strengthened.


## 3.4.4. U3 Score Analysis of Cultural Level

In the sub-item score analysis of secondary factors at the cultural level, the highest score of Gang is 3.42, followed by the eastern Zhejiang culture evaluation score of 3.30, and the lowest is the egret culture score of 3.01. From the scores, it can be seen that the cultural hierarchy of the environmental landscape of a university campus focuses on the Gang culture and the eastern Zhejiang culture, which is specifically reflected in the physical embodiment of the architectural structure. The names of the teaching building and the college building are named after the donors, which fully reflects the “Gang” merchant culture and the feelings of patriotism and benefiting Sangzi. At the same time, the roads in the campus are named after historical scholars, such as “Yangming Road,” which reflects the eastern Zhejiang culture. Therefore, the cultural characteristics of the environmental landscape of a university campus are obvious and impressive.


## 4. Conclusion

When discussing the recessive education of landscape culture, this study first expounds on the difference between Recessive Education of landscape culture and environmental education from the characteristics of natural landscape culture and its effect on people’s thoughts and behavior. Taking the environmental culture of the campus landscape as the thinking goal, this study analyzes the current situation of the implicit education of the campus environment, summarizes the environmental cultural factors that produce the implicit education function of the campus landscape, and obtains the necessity and importance of developing and utilizing the implicit education function of the campus environment. Further, this study analyzes the defects and root causes of the current campus environment construction from the perspective of the function mechanism, function mechanism and operation mechanism of the implicit educational function of the campus environment culture. At the same time, the research was carried out with the theme of a university campus landscape and its cultural construction and the implicit education of landscape culture, and the opinions and suggestions of the respondents on the school landscape and its cultural construction and the development and utilization of the implicit education function of landscape culture were collected and sorted out.(1)
The school should follow certain principles and laws in carrying out the recessive education of the environment. It should combine the educational purpose of the school, highlight the educational function, integrate the cultural factors into the landscape, proceed from reality, and carry out teaching guidance according to people and local conditions, so as to promote teachers and students to accept the transformation of the recessive education of campus landscape culture from passive to active, and realize their own social value.(2)
The implicit education of campus landscape environment is an indispensable part of school education. Schools should build a systematic campus environment landscape step by step and plan, give play to the static and dynamic functional mechanisms of campus landscape culture, and make the campus environment construction complete the transformation of two types of education forms: That is, the transformation of landscape environment from beautifying the environment to affecting people, and the transformation of school teaching from “people to people” to “environment and people to people”.



---

*Source: 3576689-2022-09-07.xml*