# Experimental Analysis of Residual Stress and Bending Strength of Gear Tooth Surface after Shot Peening Treatment

Authors: Dong Liang; Sheng Meng; Yi Chen; Chengli Hua
Journal: Shock and Vibration
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

The fatigue strength of a gear tooth surface is affected by various factors, which subsequently impacts the transmission performance of gears. Usually, shot peening treatment is carried out during processing to improve the performance of gears. Most current studies focus on theoretical descriptions and simulation analyses of shot peening treatment. However, in this paper, the relationships among shot peening treatment, residual stress, and bending fatigue strength of a gear tooth surface are discussed, through experimental methods. Based on X-ray stress analysis, at select locations on the test samples, the residual stresses on gear tooth surfaces with and without shot peening treatment are determined and contrasted. The results show that shot peening treatment can effectively increase the residual stress on gear tooth surfaces. In addition, an electromagnetic resonance fatigue tester is used to analyze the bending fatigue strength of gear tooth surfaces. The test results indicate that the bending fatigue strength of the gear teeth with shot peening is higher than that of the gear teeth without shot peening. The obtained conclusions lay the foundation for further practical engineering applications of gears.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Residual stresses in the parts are caused by various kinds of elastic and plastic deformation in the machining process [1]. The formation of residual stress is related to the material, shape, forming, and processing technology of a part, and residual stresses usually cannot be directly determined through formulas or empirical evidence. Residual stress greatly influences the fatigue strength, stress corrosion, and shape accuracy of the parts. In recent years, many scholars have used different principles and methods to conduct studies pertaining to residual stress, including the measurement and calculation of residual stress, analyses of residual stresses in key parts during service, and analyses of residual stresses in new materials and new technology [2–12].Gear transmissions are an important part of the modern industry. Related research has gradually focused on producing high-speed, heavy-duty, long-life, and low-cost gear transmissions. Shot peening treatment is usually used in gear processing to provide improved fatigue strength. At present, there are in-depth studies on shot peening strengthening that review the development of traditional shot peening machines and discuss new shot peening methods, such as laser impact technology and ultrasonic impact technology [13–17]. Scholars have found that shot peening treatment can improve material performance because of the residual compressive stress distributed on the part surface. However, the relationship between shot peening and residual stress and the relationship between residual stress and gear performance have gradually become the research focus in recent years.Due to the limitations in experimental conditions, most studies on the relationship between shot peening and residual stress have been made based on finite element simulation analysis or residual stress measurement with mechanical methods. For studies on gear strength, summarized conclusions have been obtained, but there is little specific experimental data to analyze.In this paper, gears are subjected to shot peening treatments, wherein the shot peening variables are controlled during processing; other gears from the same batch are not subjected to shot peening and are used as a comparison. Furthermore, experimental studies based on an X-ray stress analyzer and an electromagnetic resonance fatigue tester is proposed. The results from these studies are utilized to determine the relationships among shot peening strengthening, residual stress, and bending strength of gears.


## 2. Residual Stress Comparison Test

### 2.1. Experimental Scheme

The gear material used in this experiment was 20CrMnMo, which has good comprehensive mechanical properties. The basic design parameters of the gears are shown in Table1.Table 1
Design parameters of the gears.
ParametersValuesModulemn (mm)5Number of teethZ30Tooth widthB (mm)50Pressure angleα (°)30°Modification coefficientx0Helix angleβ0°Tooth root radiusrf (mm)1.9Fifty gears from the same batch were randomly selected and divided into groups A and B. For group A, shot peening treatment was performed on the tooth root after processing, whereas group B was not subjected to a shot peening treatment. Table2 shows the parameters and the standard used in the shot peening process.Table 2
Shot peening parameters and standard.
Shot peening standardMIL-S-13165CProjectile diameterCW23Shot peening intensity0.35–0.4ACoverage200%After performing the shot peening procedure, measurements were carried out using a Proto-iXRD type X-ray stress analyzer. Three gears were randomly selected from group A and group B. Locations T1, T2, and T3 were also determined along the outer circle of the gear, wherein these locations are separated by 120°. Morever, two test points were selected for each position. The stress analysis site is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Stress analysis site.


### 2.2. Residual Stress Test

The detected residual stresses on the gear surface for group A and group B are displayed in Table3.Table 3
Detected residual stresses.
Gear numberGear locationTest point 1 (N)Test point 2 (N)Absolute value of difference |Δ| (N)B1T1−498−51820B1T2−531−52110B1T3−540−5355A1T1−621−6129A1T2−572−55121A1T3−621−61110B2T1−511−49120B2T2−507−48819B2T3−538−56224A2T1−565−55312A2T2−516−52913A2T3−586−5779B3T1−501−48615B3T2−499−5045B3T3−511−49813A3T1−637−59641A3T2−557−5658A3T3−639−6372The absolute value of the maximum stress difference between test point 1 and test point 2 was 41 MPa. Obviously, the residual stress was higher on the shot peened gear surface with shot peening treatment than on the gear surface without shot peening treatment. The increases in residual stress varied because of the randomness of the residual stress distribution. To evaluate the overall improvement level, we used the average residual stress as a comparison. The average stresses of group A and group B were −585.833 MPa and −513.278 MPa, respectively. Compared with group B, group A had 14% higher residual strength. Thus, shot peening treatment can effectively increase the residual stress in gear teeth.


## 2.1. Experimental Scheme

The gear material used in this experiment was 20CrMnMo, which has good comprehensive mechanical properties. The basic design parameters of the gears are shown in Table1.Table 1
Design parameters of the gears.
ParametersValuesModulemn (mm)5Number of teethZ30Tooth widthB (mm)50Pressure angleα (°)30°Modification coefficientx0Helix angleβ0°Tooth root radiusrf (mm)1.9Fifty gears from the same batch were randomly selected and divided into groups A and B. For group A, shot peening treatment was performed on the tooth root after processing, whereas group B was not subjected to a shot peening treatment. Table2 shows the parameters and the standard used in the shot peening process.Table 2
Shot peening parameters and standard.
Shot peening standardMIL-S-13165CProjectile diameterCW23Shot peening intensity0.35–0.4ACoverage200%After performing the shot peening procedure, measurements were carried out using a Proto-iXRD type X-ray stress analyzer. Three gears were randomly selected from group A and group B. Locations T1, T2, and T3 were also determined along the outer circle of the gear, wherein these locations are separated by 120°. Morever, two test points were selected for each position. The stress analysis site is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Stress analysis site.


## 2.2. Residual Stress Test

The detected residual stresses on the gear surface for group A and group B are displayed in Table3.Table 3
Detected residual stresses.
Gear numberGear locationTest point 1 (N)Test point 2 (N)Absolute value of difference |Δ| (N)B1T1−498−51820B1T2−531−52110B1T3−540−5355A1T1−621−6129A1T2−572−55121A1T3−621−61110B2T1−511−49120B2T2−507−48819B2T3−538−56224A2T1−565−55312A2T2−516−52913A2T3−586−5779B3T1−501−48615B3T2−499−5045B3T3−511−49813A3T1−637−59641A3T2−557−5658A3T3−639−6372The absolute value of the maximum stress difference between test point 1 and test point 2 was 41 MPa. Obviously, the residual stress was higher on the shot peened gear surface with shot peening treatment than on the gear surface without shot peening treatment. The increases in residual stress varied because of the randomness of the residual stress distribution. To evaluate the overall improvement level, we used the average residual stress as a comparison. The average stresses of group A and group B were −585.833 MPa and −513.278 MPa, respectively. Compared with group B, group A had 14% higher residual strength. Thus, shot peening treatment can effectively increase the residual stress in gear teeth.


## 3. Analysis of the Bending Strength of Shot Peened Gear Teeth

Usually, a gear tooth can be simplified as a cantilever beam under the working condition. Given the normal load on gear teeth, bending stresses will occur on the root of the teeth; as a result, cracks often appear due to the serious stress concentrations. With continuous crack propagation, whole teeth or parts of teeth may fracture [18].In this section, an analysis of shot peening treatment on the bending strength of gear teeth is discussed by means of experimental comparisons.


### 3.1. Experimental Scheme

This experiment adopted a high-frequency pulsation gear test, wherein the tested gear is always in a state of rest within the testing apparatus. Moreover, the pressure head applied a pulsating cyclic load on the tested gear teeth to allow the gear teeth to break off. The test equipment used for this test was a Zwick/Amsler 250 HFP 5100 electromagnetic resonance fatigue testing machine (Germany), as shown in Figure2. The testing machine possessed a high loading precision: the static-dynamic loading was ±0.5%, the static loading range was ±150 kN, and the dynamic unidirectional pulsation was ±125 kN. The loading frequency range was 35–300 Hz.Figure 2
Zwick/Amsler 250 HFP 5100.According to GB/T 14230-1993 [19], the following can be determined through calculations and simulations with the tested gear parameters while the gear was clamped. The test was performed on five teeth of the tested gears. The distance between the high point of action and the low point of action was 68.523788 mm, which was the same as the length of the common normal line spanning 5 teeth. The dimensional error during installation was controlled within ±0.1 mm.This test adopted group and staircase methods. The test load can also be divided into four load levels. The group method was used to determine the diagonal part of the P–S–N curve, and the staircase method was used to determine the straight line in the curve.The test load was set in accordance with GB/T14230-1993. The number of bending stress cycles of each test point at the highest stress level was ≥0.5 × 105. Random sampling in all products can reflect the general features. The test aimed to fully utilize each gear tooth and minimize the mutual effect of loading gear teeth. Two gear teeth separated every two tested gear teeth, and each loaded gear tooth was numbered accordingly. The tested gears can be divided into two categories under three kinds of numbering, which adhered to the following principles:(1)
In this test, a gear with shot peening treatment was an A series and a gear without shot peening treatment was defined as a B series.(2)
According to the test order of the same gear series, the tested gear teeth were numbered as 1, 2, 3, etc.(3)
The test load level was labeled.For example, B1-1-78 kN means testing the first tooth of the No. 1 gear without shot peening treatment with a load of 78 kN.The tested gear teeth were in a certain order of test. The high working teeth were numbered 1, 2, 3, and 4, whereas the corresponding low working teeth were numbered 1′, 2′, 3′, and 4′.The gear teeth labeling is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Gear teeth labeling.The criteria for stopping the bending fatigue test are as follows.During the test, if one of the following conditions occurs, then the bending is terminated:(1)
Fatigue cracks observed in the tooth root.(2)
The load or frequency dropped by 5%–10%.(3)
The tooth broke along the root. If the gear does not fail within the 3 × 106 stress cycle, then the test will also be stopped.


### 3.2. Tooth Root Stress Calculation

According to the load capacity calculation method for an involute cylindrical gear [20], the equation for tooth root stress calculation is shown as follows:(1)σF′=Ft⋅YFA⋅YSAb⋅m⋅YST⋅YδrelT⋅YRrelT⋅Yx,where Ft is the nominal tangential force of the pitch circle in the end face (N), b is the tooth width, m is the tooth modulus, YFA is the tooth profile coefficient of the action point of the gear teeth under load, YSA is the stress correction coefficient of the action point of the gear teeth under load, YST is the stress correction coefficient of the tested gear, YδrelT is the relative sensitivity coefficient of the root fillet, YRrelT is the relative condition coefficient of the root surface, and Yx is the bending strength calculation dimension coefficient.Table4 shows the parameters settings for the calculation of the root stress in this test.Table 4
Calculation parameters of tooth root stress.
SymbolValueB50 mmm5 mmYSA1.836YFA2.482YST2YδrelT1YRrelT1.12Yx1Substituting the parameter values into the equation above indicated that the relationship of root stress and load is as follows:(2)σF′=Ft⋅YFA⋅YSAb⋅m⋅YST⋅YδrelT⋅YRrelT⋅Yx=0.007425Ft.Due to the limitations in the test equipment, the loading pressure head created instability in the clamp and the test piece. Therefore, to avoid this instability effect, a certain minimum load, which is the cyclic performance coefficientR=Fmin/Fmax, is maintained in the test. The actual root stress should be converted to the pulsating cycle root stress σF when R = 0. The conversion equation is as follows:(3)σF=1−RσF′1−RσF′/σb+350,where σb is the tensile strength (N/mm2).


### 3.3. Bending Fatigue Strength Test of the Gear without Shot Peening Treatment

#### 3.3.1. Test with Group Method and Data Processing

Through the gear root stress calculations and the preliminary experiments, the experimental load with the group method was determined, as shown in Table5.Table 5
Bending fatigue test load of the gear.
Stress levelIIIIIIIVLoad value (kN)78757372Calculated tooth root stress (MPa)579.15556.88542.03534.60Pulsating tooth root stress (MPa)560.80538.84524.21516.90Mean test load (kN)40.95039.37538.32537.800Test dynamic load (kN)37.05035.62534.62534.200Fmin (kN)3.903.753.653.60Fmax (kN)78757372The results of the test with the group method are shown in Table6.Table 6
Data processing of the bending fatigue test of the gear.
Ordinal numberFatigue life at different stress levelsIIIIIIIVLifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.152001B2-4-7880295B16-2-75189195B19-1-73803965B1-3-72254434B13-4-78150568B6-2-75532257B18-2-73925469B5-2-72366220B13-1-78164084B18-1-75879460B15-4-731346204B4-3-72481369B1-1-78224971B9-2-751057880B2-2-732181065B4-2-72591155B11-4-78695260B11-2-751515670B15-1-732395745B5-4-726154634B9-1-78712435B5-1-751721448B17-2-732857876B11-3-727170261B16-3-781020368B8-4-751811442B7-4-733000000B19-2-72Lognormal distribution and three-parameter Weibull distribution tests were performed on the fatigue life at the load levels above.Weibull distribution is derived from the weakest link model. It can be simply described that a chain is formed by many chain links in series. When both ends are under tension, any one of the links breaks and the chain fails. Obviously, the chain fracture occurs in the weakest link. The life of components, parts, devices, and equipment stopping whole running due to a certain local failure can be regarded as following the Weibull distribution, while the fatigue strength, fatigue life, and wear life in machinery mostly follow the Weibull distribution. The probability density function and distribution function of three-parameter Weibull distribution are defined as(4)fx=βηx−γηβ−1exp−x−γηβ,x≥γ,Fx=1−exp−x−γηβ,x≥γ,where β, γ, and η are three parameters for describing Weibull distribution, β is a shape parameter, which determines the shape of the distribution curve, γ is a position parameter and it determines the starting position of the distribution curve, and η is a scale parameter, which reflects the dispersion of the life data.The correlation coefficients (R) were calculated, and the results are shown in Table 7.Table 7
Distribution test results.
Lifetime distributionLifetime correlation coefficients (R) at different stress levels560.80538.84524.21516.90Lognormal distribution0.96150.96340.92960.9667Three-parameter weibull distribution0.98860.97580.97250.9765The three-parameter Weibull distribution exhibited the best fitting effect on the bending fatigue life of the gear. Thus, the three-parameter Weibull distribution calculation in each stress level is shown in Table8.Table 8
Fitting parameters.
Stress levelThree-parameter Weibull distribution parametersShape parameter (M)Scale parameter (η)Location parameter (r)560.800.61544355350889538.840.70193790066318524.211.297613167600516.900.77351149989728240The position parameterr showed that the lifetime of the gear without shot peening treatment followed the three-parameter Weibull distribution at stress levels I, II, and IV. This gear also followed the two-parameter Weibull distribution at stress level III.


#### 3.3.2. Test with Staircase Method and Data Processing

The test loads with the staircase method are shown in Table9.Table 9
Bending fatigue test load of the gear.
Stress levelIIIIIIIVLoad value (kN)74727068Calculated tooth root stress (MPa)549.45534.60519.75504.90Pulsating tooth root stress (MPa)531.52516.90502.30487.70Mean test load (kN)38.8537.8036.7535.70Test dynamic load (kN)35.1534.2033.2532.30Fmin (kN)3.73.63.53.4Fmax (kN)74727068The test data with the staircase method are shown in Table10.Table 10
Stability test data.
No.Sample no.Load value (kN)Lifetime (N × 105)FN=1/n∑i=1nFiσn=Fn−Fn−1/Fn1B6-3-72724.372.00000—2B6-4-707030.071.000000.0140803B15-2-72722.371.333330.0046734B16-1-70701.171.000000.004695B16-4-686830.070.400000.008526B14-1-70707.070.333330.000957B14-3-686830.070.000000.004768B20-2-70702.770.0000009B20-4-686830.069.777780.00318010B10-4-707030.069.800000.00031811B10-3-72724.270.000000.00285712B20-5-74748.070.333330.00473913B5-3-72722.670.461540.00182014B1-4-707030.070.428570.00047015B18-3-72721.470.533330.00148516B9-4-707030.070.500000.0004717B9-3-727230.070.588240.0012518B5-5-74747.770.777780.002678Table10 shows that the test from the 6th testing point through the 18th testing point satisfies the following stability error condition:(5)σn≤0.5%.The up-and-down test results obtained with the staircase method are shown in Figure4. The total number of samples was 18, of which 9 broke.Figure 4
Up-and-down test results with the staircase method.The median load of this gear can be obtained asF = 70.5 kN through calculation with the staircase method. The median fatigue strength of the gear is shown as follows:(6)σA50=505.95MPa.The P–S–N curve of the bending fatigue strength of the gear without shot peening treatment is displayed in Figure5.Figure 5
P–S–N curve of the bending fatigue strength of the gear without shot peening treatment.According to the results in the figure above, the ultimate bending strength of the gear without shot peening treatment under different degrees of reliability is shown in Table11.Table 11
Ultimate bending strength of the tested gear without shot peening treatment under different degrees of reliability.
Degree of reliability (%)99959050105Ultimate bending strength (MPa)444.64466.89477.07504.77523.25527.40


### 3.4. Bending Fatigue Strength Test for the Shot Peened Gear

#### 3.4.1. Test with Group Method and Data Processing

The test loads were determined, as shown in Table12. The results of the test with group method are displayed in Table 13.Table 12
Bending fatigue test load of the gear.
Stress levelIIIIIIIVLoad value (kN)81787675Calculated tooth root stress (MPa)601.43579.15564.30556.88Corrected tooth root stress (MPa)582.81560.80546.16538.84Mean test load (kN)42.52540.95039.90039.375Test dynamic load (kN)38.47537.05036.10035.625Fmin (kN)4.053.903.803.75Fmax (kN)81787675Table 13
Data processing of the gear bending fatigue life.
Ordinal numberFatigue life at different stress levelsIIIIIIIVLifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.150892A8-4-81141594A10-3-78190347A1-2-76543860A17-3-75279582A7-2-81156529A6-1-78194017A2-2-76726517A19-2-753111899A7-3-81251908A2-1-78241713A8-1-761227752A6-2-754112428A3-4-81269224A17-2-78278029A1-1-761324990A10-3-755124084A10-2-81342719A7-4-78811387A4-1-761748937A4-2-756156865A11-1-81376832A11-2-781125686A1-3-761939033A15-2-757————1401843A2-4-762057398A17-4-75——————4251335A13-4-75Lognormal distribution and three-parameter Weibull distribution tests were also performed on the fatigue life at the load levels above. TheR values are shown in Table 14.Table 14
Distribution test results.
Lifetime distributionLifetime correlation coefficients (R) at different stress levels582.81560.80546.16538.84Lognormal distribution0.95240.96440.93230.9734Three-parameter Weibull distribution0.97670.96760.98160.9707The three-parameter Weibull distribution exhibited the best fitting effect on the bending fatigue life of the gear. Thus, the three-parameter Weibull distribution calculation at each stress level is depicted in Table15.Table 15
Fitting parameters.
Stress levelThree-parameter Weibull distribution parametersShape parameter (M)Scale parameter (η)Location parameter (r)582.812.57201230530560.802.55282927560546.160.3518279014189939538.842.062015853350The location parameter showed that the bending fatigue life of the shot peened gear followed the two-parameter Weibull distribution at stress levels I, II, and IV and followed the three-parameter Weibull distribution at stress level III.


#### 3.4.2. Test with Staircase Method and Data Processing

Through preliminary tests with the test data collected from the group method, the test loads with the staircase method were obtained, as shown in Table16. The results of the test with the staircase method are also shown in Table 17.Table 16
Bending fatigue test load of the gear.
Stress levelIIIIIIIVLoad value (kN)75747372Calculated tooth root stress (MPa)556.88549.45542.03534.60Pulsating tooth root stress (MPa)538.84531.52524.21516.90Mean test load (kN)38.8537.8036.7535.70Test dynamic load (kN)35.1534.2033.2532.30Fmin (kN)3.73.63.53.4Fmax (kN)75747372Table 17
Stability test data.
No.Sample no.Load valueFN (kN)Lifetime (N × 105)FN=1/n∑i=1nFiσn=Fn−Fn−1/Fn1A13-2-75753.8375.00000—2A13-1-747430.0074.500000.0067103A12-1-75753.4974.666670.0022324A13-3-747430.0074.500000.0022405A12-2-75753.5474.600000.0013406A16-1-74746.0974.500000.0013407A6-3-737330.0074.285710.0028808A14-2-74743.5774.250000.0004809A20-1-737330.0074.111110.00187010A20-2-747430.0074.100000.00015011A20-3-75751.6574.181820.00110312A14-1-74746.2574.166670.00020013A6-4-73737.8974.076920.00121014A4-4-727230.0073.928570.00201015A12-4-737330.0073.866670.00084016A20-2-747430.0073.875000.000113Table17 shows that the staircase test from the 3rd testing point through the 16th testing point satisfies the stability error σn≤0.5%.The up-and-down test results with the staircase method are shown in Figure6. The total number of samples was 16, of which 8 broke.Figure 6
Test results with the staircase method.The median load of this type of gear can be obtained asF = 73.875 kN through calculation with the staircase method. The median fatigue strength of the gear is shown as follows:(7)σA50=530.61MPa.The P–S–N curve of the gear with shot peening treatment is displayed in Figure7.Figure 7
P–S–N curve of the bending fatigue strength of the gear with shot peening treatment.Table18 shows the ultimate bending strength of the gear with shot peening treatment under different degrees of reliability, according to Figure 7.Table 18
Ultimate bending strength of the gear with shot peening treatment under different degrees of reliability.
Degree of reliability (%)99959050105Ultimate bending strength (MPa)508.46517.06520.90531.09537.69539.15


### 3.5. Results and Discussion

In accordance with reliability theory, the P-S-N curves of the gears with and without shot peening treatment and the bending fatigue strength of these gears under different reliability degrees can be obtained. The results are summarized in Table19.Table 19
Ultimate bending strength under different degrees of reliability.
Degree of reliability (%)99959050105Bending fatigue strength test with shot peening treatment (MPa)508.46517.06520.9531.09537.69539.15Bending fatigue strength test without shot peening treatment (MPa)444.64466.89477.07504.77523.25527.40Bending fatigue strength increase (%)14.3510.759.125.212.762.23The shot peening treatment increased the bending fatigue strength by 14.35% at a reliability degree of 99%. The residual stress test indicated that the residual compressive stress in the shot peened gear roots (group A) was 14% higher than that of gear roots without shot peening (group B). The mean values of the gear residual compressive stress with and without shot peening were −585.5 MPa and −513.3 MPa, respectively. The data showed that the residual compressive stress layer distributed at the root of the gear teeth after shot peening treatment can effectively increase the gear tooth bending fatigue strength.Further study on analysis of the microstructure and surface roughness of gear tooth surface after shot peening treatment will be carried out. And, the influences of different shot peening conditions on microstructure and surface roughness will also be analyzed.


## 3.1. Experimental Scheme

This experiment adopted a high-frequency pulsation gear test, wherein the tested gear is always in a state of rest within the testing apparatus. Moreover, the pressure head applied a pulsating cyclic load on the tested gear teeth to allow the gear teeth to break off. The test equipment used for this test was a Zwick/Amsler 250 HFP 5100 electromagnetic resonance fatigue testing machine (Germany), as shown in Figure2. The testing machine possessed a high loading precision: the static-dynamic loading was ±0.5%, the static loading range was ±150 kN, and the dynamic unidirectional pulsation was ±125 kN. The loading frequency range was 35–300 Hz.Figure 2
Zwick/Amsler 250 HFP 5100.According to GB/T 14230-1993 [19], the following can be determined through calculations and simulations with the tested gear parameters while the gear was clamped. The test was performed on five teeth of the tested gears. The distance between the high point of action and the low point of action was 68.523788 mm, which was the same as the length of the common normal line spanning 5 teeth. The dimensional error during installation was controlled within ±0.1 mm.This test adopted group and staircase methods. The test load can also be divided into four load levels. The group method was used to determine the diagonal part of the P–S–N curve, and the staircase method was used to determine the straight line in the curve.The test load was set in accordance with GB/T14230-1993. The number of bending stress cycles of each test point at the highest stress level was ≥0.5 × 105. Random sampling in all products can reflect the general features. The test aimed to fully utilize each gear tooth and minimize the mutual effect of loading gear teeth. Two gear teeth separated every two tested gear teeth, and each loaded gear tooth was numbered accordingly. The tested gears can be divided into two categories under three kinds of numbering, which adhered to the following principles:(1)
In this test, a gear with shot peening treatment was an A series and a gear without shot peening treatment was defined as a B series.(2)
According to the test order of the same gear series, the tested gear teeth were numbered as 1, 2, 3, etc.(3)
The test load level was labeled.For example, B1-1-78 kN means testing the first tooth of the No. 1 gear without shot peening treatment with a load of 78 kN.The tested gear teeth were in a certain order of test. The high working teeth were numbered 1, 2, 3, and 4, whereas the corresponding low working teeth were numbered 1′, 2′, 3′, and 4′.The gear teeth labeling is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Gear teeth labeling.The criteria for stopping the bending fatigue test are as follows.During the test, if one of the following conditions occurs, then the bending is terminated:(1)
Fatigue cracks observed in the tooth root.(2)
The load or frequency dropped by 5%–10%.(3)
The tooth broke along the root. If the gear does not fail within the 3 × 106 stress cycle, then the test will also be stopped.


## 3.2. Tooth Root Stress Calculation

According to the load capacity calculation method for an involute cylindrical gear [20], the equation for tooth root stress calculation is shown as follows:(1)σF′=Ft⋅YFA⋅YSAb⋅m⋅YST⋅YδrelT⋅YRrelT⋅Yx,where Ft is the nominal tangential force of the pitch circle in the end face (N), b is the tooth width, m is the tooth modulus, YFA is the tooth profile coefficient of the action point of the gear teeth under load, YSA is the stress correction coefficient of the action point of the gear teeth under load, YST is the stress correction coefficient of the tested gear, YδrelT is the relative sensitivity coefficient of the root fillet, YRrelT is the relative condition coefficient of the root surface, and Yx is the bending strength calculation dimension coefficient.Table4 shows the parameters settings for the calculation of the root stress in this test.Table 4
Calculation parameters of tooth root stress.
SymbolValueB50 mmm5 mmYSA1.836YFA2.482YST2YδrelT1YRrelT1.12Yx1Substituting the parameter values into the equation above indicated that the relationship of root stress and load is as follows:(2)σF′=Ft⋅YFA⋅YSAb⋅m⋅YST⋅YδrelT⋅YRrelT⋅Yx=0.007425Ft.Due to the limitations in the test equipment, the loading pressure head created instability in the clamp and the test piece. Therefore, to avoid this instability effect, a certain minimum load, which is the cyclic performance coefficientR=Fmin/Fmax, is maintained in the test. The actual root stress should be converted to the pulsating cycle root stress σF when R = 0. The conversion equation is as follows:(3)σF=1−RσF′1−RσF′/σb+350,where σb is the tensile strength (N/mm2).


## 3.3. Bending Fatigue Strength Test of the Gear without Shot Peening Treatment

### 3.3.1. Test with Group Method and Data Processing

Through the gear root stress calculations and the preliminary experiments, the experimental load with the group method was determined, as shown in Table5.Table 5
Bending fatigue test load of the gear.
Stress levelIIIIIIIVLoad value (kN)78757372Calculated tooth root stress (MPa)579.15556.88542.03534.60Pulsating tooth root stress (MPa)560.80538.84524.21516.90Mean test load (kN)40.95039.37538.32537.800Test dynamic load (kN)37.05035.62534.62534.200Fmin (kN)3.903.753.653.60Fmax (kN)78757372The results of the test with the group method are shown in Table6.Table 6
Data processing of the bending fatigue test of the gear.
Ordinal numberFatigue life at different stress levelsIIIIIIIVLifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.152001B2-4-7880295B16-2-75189195B19-1-73803965B1-3-72254434B13-4-78150568B6-2-75532257B18-2-73925469B5-2-72366220B13-1-78164084B18-1-75879460B15-4-731346204B4-3-72481369B1-1-78224971B9-2-751057880B2-2-732181065B4-2-72591155B11-4-78695260B11-2-751515670B15-1-732395745B5-4-726154634B9-1-78712435B5-1-751721448B17-2-732857876B11-3-727170261B16-3-781020368B8-4-751811442B7-4-733000000B19-2-72Lognormal distribution and three-parameter Weibull distribution tests were performed on the fatigue life at the load levels above.Weibull distribution is derived from the weakest link model. It can be simply described that a chain is formed by many chain links in series. When both ends are under tension, any one of the links breaks and the chain fails. Obviously, the chain fracture occurs in the weakest link. The life of components, parts, devices, and equipment stopping whole running due to a certain local failure can be regarded as following the Weibull distribution, while the fatigue strength, fatigue life, and wear life in machinery mostly follow the Weibull distribution. The probability density function and distribution function of three-parameter Weibull distribution are defined as(4)fx=βηx−γηβ−1exp−x−γηβ,x≥γ,Fx=1−exp−x−γηβ,x≥γ,where β, γ, and η are three parameters for describing Weibull distribution, β is a shape parameter, which determines the shape of the distribution curve, γ is a position parameter and it determines the starting position of the distribution curve, and η is a scale parameter, which reflects the dispersion of the life data.The correlation coefficients (R) were calculated, and the results are shown in Table 7.Table 7
Distribution test results.
Lifetime distributionLifetime correlation coefficients (R) at different stress levels560.80538.84524.21516.90Lognormal distribution0.96150.96340.92960.9667Three-parameter weibull distribution0.98860.97580.97250.9765The three-parameter Weibull distribution exhibited the best fitting effect on the bending fatigue life of the gear. Thus, the three-parameter Weibull distribution calculation in each stress level is shown in Table8.Table 8
Fitting parameters.
Stress levelThree-parameter Weibull distribution parametersShape parameter (M)Scale parameter (η)Location parameter (r)560.800.61544355350889538.840.70193790066318524.211.297613167600516.900.77351149989728240The position parameterr showed that the lifetime of the gear without shot peening treatment followed the three-parameter Weibull distribution at stress levels I, II, and IV. This gear also followed the two-parameter Weibull distribution at stress level III.


### 3.3.2. Test with Staircase Method and Data Processing

The test loads with the staircase method are shown in Table9.Table 9
Bending fatigue test load of the gear.
Stress levelIIIIIIIVLoad value (kN)74727068Calculated tooth root stress (MPa)549.45534.60519.75504.90Pulsating tooth root stress (MPa)531.52516.90502.30487.70Mean test load (kN)38.8537.8036.7535.70Test dynamic load (kN)35.1534.2033.2532.30Fmin (kN)3.73.63.53.4Fmax (kN)74727068The test data with the staircase method are shown in Table10.Table 10
Stability test data.
No.Sample no.Load value (kN)Lifetime (N × 105)FN=1/n∑i=1nFiσn=Fn−Fn−1/Fn1B6-3-72724.372.00000—2B6-4-707030.071.000000.0140803B15-2-72722.371.333330.0046734B16-1-70701.171.000000.004695B16-4-686830.070.400000.008526B14-1-70707.070.333330.000957B14-3-686830.070.000000.004768B20-2-70702.770.0000009B20-4-686830.069.777780.00318010B10-4-707030.069.800000.00031811B10-3-72724.270.000000.00285712B20-5-74748.070.333330.00473913B5-3-72722.670.461540.00182014B1-4-707030.070.428570.00047015B18-3-72721.470.533330.00148516B9-4-707030.070.500000.0004717B9-3-727230.070.588240.0012518B5-5-74747.770.777780.002678Table10 shows that the test from the 6th testing point through the 18th testing point satisfies the following stability error condition:(5)σn≤0.5%.The up-and-down test results obtained with the staircase method are shown in Figure4. The total number of samples was 18, of which 9 broke.Figure 4
Up-and-down test results with the staircase method.The median load of this gear can be obtained asF = 70.5 kN through calculation with the staircase method. The median fatigue strength of the gear is shown as follows:(6)σA50=505.95MPa.The P–S–N curve of the bending fatigue strength of the gear without shot peening treatment is displayed in Figure5.Figure 5
P–S–N curve of the bending fatigue strength of the gear without shot peening treatment.According to the results in the figure above, the ultimate bending strength of the gear without shot peening treatment under different degrees of reliability is shown in Table11.Table 11
Ultimate bending strength of the tested gear without shot peening treatment under different degrees of reliability.
Degree of reliability (%)99959050105Ultimate bending strength (MPa)444.64466.89477.07504.77523.25527.40


## 3.3.1. Test with Group Method and Data Processing

Through the gear root stress calculations and the preliminary experiments, the experimental load with the group method was determined, as shown in Table5.Table 5
Bending fatigue test load of the gear.
Stress levelIIIIIIIVLoad value (kN)78757372Calculated tooth root stress (MPa)579.15556.88542.03534.60Pulsating tooth root stress (MPa)560.80538.84524.21516.90Mean test load (kN)40.95039.37538.32537.800Test dynamic load (kN)37.05035.62534.62534.200Fmin (kN)3.903.753.653.60Fmax (kN)78757372The results of the test with the group method are shown in Table6.Table 6
Data processing of the bending fatigue test of the gear.
Ordinal numberFatigue life at different stress levelsIIIIIIIVLifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.152001B2-4-7880295B16-2-75189195B19-1-73803965B1-3-72254434B13-4-78150568B6-2-75532257B18-2-73925469B5-2-72366220B13-1-78164084B18-1-75879460B15-4-731346204B4-3-72481369B1-1-78224971B9-2-751057880B2-2-732181065B4-2-72591155B11-4-78695260B11-2-751515670B15-1-732395745B5-4-726154634B9-1-78712435B5-1-751721448B17-2-732857876B11-3-727170261B16-3-781020368B8-4-751811442B7-4-733000000B19-2-72Lognormal distribution and three-parameter Weibull distribution tests were performed on the fatigue life at the load levels above.Weibull distribution is derived from the weakest link model. It can be simply described that a chain is formed by many chain links in series. When both ends are under tension, any one of the links breaks and the chain fails. Obviously, the chain fracture occurs in the weakest link. The life of components, parts, devices, and equipment stopping whole running due to a certain local failure can be regarded as following the Weibull distribution, while the fatigue strength, fatigue life, and wear life in machinery mostly follow the Weibull distribution. The probability density function and distribution function of three-parameter Weibull distribution are defined as(4)fx=βηx−γηβ−1exp−x−γηβ,x≥γ,Fx=1−exp−x−γηβ,x≥γ,where β, γ, and η are three parameters for describing Weibull distribution, β is a shape parameter, which determines the shape of the distribution curve, γ is a position parameter and it determines the starting position of the distribution curve, and η is a scale parameter, which reflects the dispersion of the life data.The correlation coefficients (R) were calculated, and the results are shown in Table 7.Table 7
Distribution test results.
Lifetime distributionLifetime correlation coefficients (R) at different stress levels560.80538.84524.21516.90Lognormal distribution0.96150.96340.92960.9667Three-parameter weibull distribution0.98860.97580.97250.9765The three-parameter Weibull distribution exhibited the best fitting effect on the bending fatigue life of the gear. Thus, the three-parameter Weibull distribution calculation in each stress level is shown in Table8.Table 8
Fitting parameters.
Stress levelThree-parameter Weibull distribution parametersShape parameter (M)Scale parameter (η)Location parameter (r)560.800.61544355350889538.840.70193790066318524.211.297613167600516.900.77351149989728240The position parameterr showed that the lifetime of the gear without shot peening treatment followed the three-parameter Weibull distribution at stress levels I, II, and IV. This gear also followed the two-parameter Weibull distribution at stress level III.


## 3.3.2. Test with Staircase Method and Data Processing

The test loads with the staircase method are shown in Table9.Table 9
Bending fatigue test load of the gear.
Stress levelIIIIIIIVLoad value (kN)74727068Calculated tooth root stress (MPa)549.45534.60519.75504.90Pulsating tooth root stress (MPa)531.52516.90502.30487.70Mean test load (kN)38.8537.8036.7535.70Test dynamic load (kN)35.1534.2033.2532.30Fmin (kN)3.73.63.53.4Fmax (kN)74727068The test data with the staircase method are shown in Table10.Table 10
Stability test data.
No.Sample no.Load value (kN)Lifetime (N × 105)FN=1/n∑i=1nFiσn=Fn−Fn−1/Fn1B6-3-72724.372.00000—2B6-4-707030.071.000000.0140803B15-2-72722.371.333330.0046734B16-1-70701.171.000000.004695B16-4-686830.070.400000.008526B14-1-70707.070.333330.000957B14-3-686830.070.000000.004768B20-2-70702.770.0000009B20-4-686830.069.777780.00318010B10-4-707030.069.800000.00031811B10-3-72724.270.000000.00285712B20-5-74748.070.333330.00473913B5-3-72722.670.461540.00182014B1-4-707030.070.428570.00047015B18-3-72721.470.533330.00148516B9-4-707030.070.500000.0004717B9-3-727230.070.588240.0012518B5-5-74747.770.777780.002678Table10 shows that the test from the 6th testing point through the 18th testing point satisfies the following stability error condition:(5)σn≤0.5%.The up-and-down test results obtained with the staircase method are shown in Figure4. The total number of samples was 18, of which 9 broke.Figure 4
Up-and-down test results with the staircase method.The median load of this gear can be obtained asF = 70.5 kN through calculation with the staircase method. The median fatigue strength of the gear is shown as follows:(6)σA50=505.95MPa.The P–S–N curve of the bending fatigue strength of the gear without shot peening treatment is displayed in Figure5.Figure 5
P–S–N curve of the bending fatigue strength of the gear without shot peening treatment.According to the results in the figure above, the ultimate bending strength of the gear without shot peening treatment under different degrees of reliability is shown in Table11.Table 11
Ultimate bending strength of the tested gear without shot peening treatment under different degrees of reliability.
Degree of reliability (%)99959050105Ultimate bending strength (MPa)444.64466.89477.07504.77523.25527.40


## 3.4. Bending Fatigue Strength Test for the Shot Peened Gear

### 3.4.1. Test with Group Method and Data Processing

The test loads were determined, as shown in Table12. The results of the test with group method are displayed in Table 13.Table 12
Bending fatigue test load of the gear.
Stress levelIIIIIIIVLoad value (kN)81787675Calculated tooth root stress (MPa)601.43579.15564.30556.88Corrected tooth root stress (MPa)582.81560.80546.16538.84Mean test load (kN)42.52540.95039.90039.375Test dynamic load (kN)38.47537.05036.10035.625Fmin (kN)4.053.903.803.75Fmax (kN)81787675Table 13
Data processing of the gear bending fatigue life.
Ordinal numberFatigue life at different stress levelsIIIIIIIVLifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.150892A8-4-81141594A10-3-78190347A1-2-76543860A17-3-75279582A7-2-81156529A6-1-78194017A2-2-76726517A19-2-753111899A7-3-81251908A2-1-78241713A8-1-761227752A6-2-754112428A3-4-81269224A17-2-78278029A1-1-761324990A10-3-755124084A10-2-81342719A7-4-78811387A4-1-761748937A4-2-756156865A11-1-81376832A11-2-781125686A1-3-761939033A15-2-757————1401843A2-4-762057398A17-4-75——————4251335A13-4-75Lognormal distribution and three-parameter Weibull distribution tests were also performed on the fatigue life at the load levels above. TheR values are shown in Table 14.Table 14
Distribution test results.
Lifetime distributionLifetime correlation coefficients (R) at different stress levels582.81560.80546.16538.84Lognormal distribution0.95240.96440.93230.9734Three-parameter Weibull distribution0.97670.96760.98160.9707The three-parameter Weibull distribution exhibited the best fitting effect on the bending fatigue life of the gear. Thus, the three-parameter Weibull distribution calculation at each stress level is depicted in Table15.Table 15
Fitting parameters.
Stress levelThree-parameter Weibull distribution parametersShape parameter (M)Scale parameter (η)Location parameter (r)582.812.57201230530560.802.55282927560546.160.3518279014189939538.842.062015853350The location parameter showed that the bending fatigue life of the shot peened gear followed the two-parameter Weibull distribution at stress levels I, II, and IV and followed the three-parameter Weibull distribution at stress level III.


### 3.4.2. Test with Staircase Method and Data Processing

Through preliminary tests with the test data collected from the group method, the test loads with the staircase method were obtained, as shown in Table16. The results of the test with the staircase method are also shown in Table 17.Table 16
Bending fatigue test load of the gear.
Stress levelIIIIIIIVLoad value (kN)75747372Calculated tooth root stress (MPa)556.88549.45542.03534.60Pulsating tooth root stress (MPa)538.84531.52524.21516.90Mean test load (kN)38.8537.8036.7535.70Test dynamic load (kN)35.1534.2033.2532.30Fmin (kN)3.73.63.53.4Fmax (kN)75747372Table 17
Stability test data.
No.Sample no.Load valueFN (kN)Lifetime (N × 105)FN=1/n∑i=1nFiσn=Fn−Fn−1/Fn1A13-2-75753.8375.00000—2A13-1-747430.0074.500000.0067103A12-1-75753.4974.666670.0022324A13-3-747430.0074.500000.0022405A12-2-75753.5474.600000.0013406A16-1-74746.0974.500000.0013407A6-3-737330.0074.285710.0028808A14-2-74743.5774.250000.0004809A20-1-737330.0074.111110.00187010A20-2-747430.0074.100000.00015011A20-3-75751.6574.181820.00110312A14-1-74746.2574.166670.00020013A6-4-73737.8974.076920.00121014A4-4-727230.0073.928570.00201015A12-4-737330.0073.866670.00084016A20-2-747430.0073.875000.000113Table17 shows that the staircase test from the 3rd testing point through the 16th testing point satisfies the stability error σn≤0.5%.The up-and-down test results with the staircase method are shown in Figure6. The total number of samples was 16, of which 8 broke.Figure 6
Test results with the staircase method.The median load of this type of gear can be obtained asF = 73.875 kN through calculation with the staircase method. The median fatigue strength of the gear is shown as follows:(7)σA50=530.61MPa.The P–S–N curve of the gear with shot peening treatment is displayed in Figure7.Figure 7
P–S–N curve of the bending fatigue strength of the gear with shot peening treatment.Table18 shows the ultimate bending strength of the gear with shot peening treatment under different degrees of reliability, according to Figure 7.Table 18
Ultimate bending strength of the gear with shot peening treatment under different degrees of reliability.
Degree of reliability (%)99959050105Ultimate bending strength (MPa)508.46517.06520.90531.09537.69539.15


## 3.4.1. Test with Group Method and Data Processing

The test loads were determined, as shown in Table12. The results of the test with group method are displayed in Table 13.Table 12
Bending fatigue test load of the gear.
Stress levelIIIIIIIVLoad value (kN)81787675Calculated tooth root stress (MPa)601.43579.15564.30556.88Corrected tooth root stress (MPa)582.81560.80546.16538.84Mean test load (kN)42.52540.95039.90039.375Test dynamic load (kN)38.47537.05036.10035.625Fmin (kN)4.053.903.803.75Fmax (kN)81787675Table 13
Data processing of the gear bending fatigue life.
Ordinal numberFatigue life at different stress levelsIIIIIIIVLifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.LifetimeNo.150892A8-4-81141594A10-3-78190347A1-2-76543860A17-3-75279582A7-2-81156529A6-1-78194017A2-2-76726517A19-2-753111899A7-3-81251908A2-1-78241713A8-1-761227752A6-2-754112428A3-4-81269224A17-2-78278029A1-1-761324990A10-3-755124084A10-2-81342719A7-4-78811387A4-1-761748937A4-2-756156865A11-1-81376832A11-2-781125686A1-3-761939033A15-2-757————1401843A2-4-762057398A17-4-75——————4251335A13-4-75Lognormal distribution and three-parameter Weibull distribution tests were also performed on the fatigue life at the load levels above. TheR values are shown in Table 14.Table 14
Distribution test results.
Lifetime distributionLifetime correlation coefficients (R) at different stress levels582.81560.80546.16538.84Lognormal distribution0.95240.96440.93230.9734Three-parameter Weibull distribution0.97670.96760.98160.9707The three-parameter Weibull distribution exhibited the best fitting effect on the bending fatigue life of the gear. Thus, the three-parameter Weibull distribution calculation at each stress level is depicted in Table15.Table 15
Fitting parameters.
Stress levelThree-parameter Weibull distribution parametersShape parameter (M)Scale parameter (η)Location parameter (r)582.812.57201230530560.802.55282927560546.160.3518279014189939538.842.062015853350The location parameter showed that the bending fatigue life of the shot peened gear followed the two-parameter Weibull distribution at stress levels I, II, and IV and followed the three-parameter Weibull distribution at stress level III.


## 3.4.2. Test with Staircase Method and Data Processing

Through preliminary tests with the test data collected from the group method, the test loads with the staircase method were obtained, as shown in Table16. The results of the test with the staircase method are also shown in Table 17.Table 16
Bending fatigue test load of the gear.
Stress levelIIIIIIIVLoad value (kN)75747372Calculated tooth root stress (MPa)556.88549.45542.03534.60Pulsating tooth root stress (MPa)538.84531.52524.21516.90Mean test load (kN)38.8537.8036.7535.70Test dynamic load (kN)35.1534.2033.2532.30Fmin (kN)3.73.63.53.4Fmax (kN)75747372Table 17
Stability test data.
No.Sample no.Load valueFN (kN)Lifetime (N × 105)FN=1/n∑i=1nFiσn=Fn−Fn−1/Fn1A13-2-75753.8375.00000—2A13-1-747430.0074.500000.0067103A12-1-75753.4974.666670.0022324A13-3-747430.0074.500000.0022405A12-2-75753.5474.600000.0013406A16-1-74746.0974.500000.0013407A6-3-737330.0074.285710.0028808A14-2-74743.5774.250000.0004809A20-1-737330.0074.111110.00187010A20-2-747430.0074.100000.00015011A20-3-75751.6574.181820.00110312A14-1-74746.2574.166670.00020013A6-4-73737.8974.076920.00121014A4-4-727230.0073.928570.00201015A12-4-737330.0073.866670.00084016A20-2-747430.0073.875000.000113Table17 shows that the staircase test from the 3rd testing point through the 16th testing point satisfies the stability error σn≤0.5%.The up-and-down test results with the staircase method are shown in Figure6. The total number of samples was 16, of which 8 broke.Figure 6
Test results with the staircase method.The median load of this type of gear can be obtained asF = 73.875 kN through calculation with the staircase method. The median fatigue strength of the gear is shown as follows:(7)σA50=530.61MPa.The P–S–N curve of the gear with shot peening treatment is displayed in Figure7.Figure 7
P–S–N curve of the bending fatigue strength of the gear with shot peening treatment.Table18 shows the ultimate bending strength of the gear with shot peening treatment under different degrees of reliability, according to Figure 7.Table 18
Ultimate bending strength of the gear with shot peening treatment under different degrees of reliability.
Degree of reliability (%)99959050105Ultimate bending strength (MPa)508.46517.06520.90531.09537.69539.15


## 3.5. Results and Discussion

In accordance with reliability theory, the P-S-N curves of the gears with and without shot peening treatment and the bending fatigue strength of these gears under different reliability degrees can be obtained. The results are summarized in Table19.Table 19
Ultimate bending strength under different degrees of reliability.
Degree of reliability (%)99959050105Bending fatigue strength test with shot peening treatment (MPa)508.46517.06520.9531.09537.69539.15Bending fatigue strength test without shot peening treatment (MPa)444.64466.89477.07504.77523.25527.40Bending fatigue strength increase (%)14.3510.759.125.212.762.23The shot peening treatment increased the bending fatigue strength by 14.35% at a reliability degree of 99%. The residual stress test indicated that the residual compressive stress in the shot peened gear roots (group A) was 14% higher than that of gear roots without shot peening (group B). The mean values of the gear residual compressive stress with and without shot peening were −585.5 MPa and −513.3 MPa, respectively. The data showed that the residual compressive stress layer distributed at the root of the gear teeth after shot peening treatment can effectively increase the gear tooth bending fatigue strength.Further study on analysis of the microstructure and surface roughness of gear tooth surface after shot peening treatment will be carried out. And, the influences of different shot peening conditions on microstructure and surface roughness will also be analyzed.


## 4. Conclusions

The relationships among shot peening treatment, residual stress, and bending fatigue strength of the gear tooth surface were discussed based on the experimental study in this paper. Based on X-ray stress analysis, the residual stresses on gear tooth surfaces with and without shot peening treatment were determined and contrasted. The average residual stress in group A (shot peening treatment) and group B (without shot peening treatment) were −585.833 MPa and −513.278 MPa, respectively, illustrating that shot peening produced a 14% increase in residual stress. Thus, shot peening treatment can effectively improve the residual stress of gear teeth. The bending fatigue strength of the gear tooth surfaces was also analyzed with an electromagnetic resonance fatigue tester. The test results indicated that the bending fatigue strength of the gear teeth with shot peening was higher than that of gear teeth without shot peening; the shot peening treatment increased the bending fatigue strength of the gears by 14.35% at a reliability degree of 99%. Therefore, the data showed that the residual compressive stress layer distributed at the root of the gear teeth after shot peening treatment can effectively increase the gear tooth bending fatigue strength.



---

*Source: 3426504-2020-06-10.xml*