# A Wideband Reflector-Backed Antenna for Applications in GPR

Authors: A. Raza; W. Lin; M. K. Ishfaq; M. Inam; F. Masud; M. H. Dahri
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

A resistively loaded wideband slotted patch antenna with optimized performance on lower frequencies is proposed for ground-penetrating radar (GPR) applications. The proposed design is backed by an optimized reflector composed of a periodic array of square loop elements, which enhances the antenna’s gain and directivity. The antenna shows good radiation characteristics and ease of integration with the GPR systems. The proposed structure features a compact size and wide bandwidth covering from 0.6 to 4.6 GHz. The peak gain of 7 dBi is achieved. The fabricated prototype of the antenna along with an integrated optimized reflective surface has overall dimensions of 18 × 22 × 5 cm3. The measured results validate the antenna’s performance in both free space and sandy medium, which enlighten its use for GPR applications.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is an important technology developed for short-range radar applications. Electromagnetic waves are used for the detection of metallic and nonmetallic buried objects. Nowadays, GPR use not only is limited to subsurface and through wall utility detection but also has a wide range of applications in the commercial sector including nondestructive testing, explorations in mining, disaster relief work, and discovery of hidden tunnels. GPR has gained popularity due to its effectiveness in the civil and geological structural investigation. Unlike conventional radar, GPR signals travel in the lossy and inhomogeneous mediums varying in properties. With investigation of buried static targets at different depths, antennas employed in GPR should have ultrawideband characteristics. High frequencies are used for the detection of small targets in shallow depths; whereas low frequencies are used for the detection of large and deeper targets. Therefore, antennas used in GPR have an operating frequency ranging from a few MHz to GHz covering a decade bandwidth [1].Two common types of GPR systems are impulse GPR and continuous wave GPR. Most commercially available GPR systems incorporate impulse techniques. In these systems, a time-domain pulse is transmitted by the antenna and a reflected wave is received; short-duration pulse of nanosecond duration is used to achieve a broad bandwidth. Therefore, the antenna performs as an essential part of impulse GPR system performance, whereas continuous-wave GPR systems operate in the frequency domain and transmit continuously. A significant challenge in a continuous wave, both swept frequency and stepped frequency technique, is the synchronization of time in the entire sweep [2, 3].For optimization of GPR antenna, several aspects including physical dimension, weight, impedance bandwidth, and footprint are considered. In recent years, many GPR antennas are designed for a diverse range of applications including civilian and military, as well as security services. A transverse electromagnetic (TEM) horn antenna for air-coupled impulse GPR applications is presented in [4]; it operates in the broad frequency range between 0.6 and 6 GHz. A dipole antenna, in [5], is presented for structural investigation, operating in the frequency range from 0.45 to 1.1 GHz. Although 3D antennas such as horn [4], dipole [5], cone [6], and spiral [7] provide satisfactory GPR performances, their 3D structure led to an increase in size and weight of the antenna.To address this issue, various planner antennas were proposed. The tapered slot antennas can be a good competitor because of their end-fire radiation, moderate gain, small dimensions, low-cost components, and easy fabrication. A few slotted designs were also presented like a CPW-fed tapered slot antenna [8], operating in 0.64 to 6 GHz, and a compact slot antenna [9], operating in 1.4 to 3.5 GHz. These slot-loaded designs are fed by the coplanar waveguide and are compact but have the disadvantage of low gain and low resolution, as back radiation of the antenna is of no use in the GPR system. Therefore, absorbing materials are used to avoid interference with the communication spectrum [10]. This back radiation can be used to illuminate the ground. Thus, some solutions are suggested for constructively enhancing the gain of planner antennas [11–16]. In the antenna casing of GPR, the use of a reflector, cavity, electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structure, loop directors, and choke rings [17–21] is proposed for high gain GPR applications.In this study, a compact and wideband reflector backed slotted patch antenna, suitable for applications in GPR, is presented. The proposed design provides a wide bandwidth from 0.6 GHz to 4.6 GHz. Furthermore, a reflective surface is designed to enhance the radiation performance of the antenna, especially at lower frequencies. The proposed antenna is compact and is constructed using low cost and lightweight materials, as well as its simple structure provides ease in fabrication. The presented antenna is tested under soil conditions to ensure its application for GPR. Also, the proposed design can be used simultaneously for 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G applications as it covers 900/1800/1900/2100/2600/3500 MHz frequency bands.


## 2. Antenna Description

The geometrical structure of the planner slotted patch antenna (SPA) is shown in Figure1. The antenna is fabricated using low cost and lightweight materials. The radiating structure is printed over a 1.6 mm thick FR-4 substrate with relative permittivity of 4.4. To have better control over characteristics impedance, the SPA antenna is fed by a tapered feed. The patch antenna has numerous advantages, such as being lightweight, low cost, and high gain, as compared to the CPW counterpart [22].Figure 1
Geometrical construction of the planner SPA: (a) top radiator and (b) bottom view (ground plane).Therefore, the antenna-radiating structure is optimized to minimize aperture reflections and achieve wideband operation while keeping the antenna size small. Generally speaking, the mentioned antenna is geometrically designed using four elliptical patches. The big elliptical patches, having radii ER1 and ER2, are parallel to each other and orthogonal to two small patches of radii ER3 and ER4. This configuration created a uniformly tapered bowtie-shaped radiating slot with a separation of 2 mm in the middle and 20 mm on the sides. The uniformly tapered bowtie-shaped radiating slot changes the direction and effective length of surface current on the radiator [23, 24]. A resistor is placed at the center of the slot for lower band operation. This design is termed as a resistive loaded slotted patch antenna (RLSPA). The planner antenna covers a dimension of 18 × 22 cm2. The antenna is further fine tuned using an inbuilt optimizer of antenna simulation software. The detailed dimensions of the antenna are described as below (in millimeters): L = 220, W = 180, ER1 = 80, ER2 = 25, ER3 = 35, ER4 = 12, LF = 111, WF = 3.6, L1 = 3.8, L2 = 19.5, g = 0.6, Lg = 110, L3 = 20.6, L4 = 20.2, SH = 60, and D = 50. The geometrical structure of the proposed reflector-backed antenna along with the fabrication is shown in Figure 2. The reflector comprises a 4 × 4 slot array, where the size of each slot is 2 × 3 cm2.Figure 2
Geometry of the reflector-backed antenna: (a) side view (b) 3D view; (b) reflector-backed fabricated antenna.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3. Working Principle

A typical antenna in an impulse radar system should operate in a lower range of frequencies with compact dimensions. Therefore, the equivalent circuit of the reflector-backed antenna is investigated, as shown in Figure3. The structure can be divided into three parts: (1) a square inductive metallic ring, (2) capacitive slot, and (3) ground plane of RLSPA act as a metallic layer [25].Figure 3
Equivalent circuit of the proposed reflector-backed antenna.The ground plane is modelled as inductance Lh and the layer between reflector and ground plane has capacitance coupling, which is represented as Ch [24, 25]. By using transmission line theory, the equivalent circuit input impedance can be expressed as a combination of inductive and capacitive components of the reflective surface as(1)ZL=1jωCh,ZH=11/jωL1+1/jωLh.The antenna’s performance can be determined by many parameters including antenna size, radiation characteristics, bandwidth, and stable gain. Aperture reflections are a considerable cause of the reduction in radiation efficiency of UWB antennas for GPR [17].GPR antennas have to satisfy a broad frequency band for better imaging resolution of the GPR system. Consequently, the removal of discontinuous points in radiation structure is considered an important optimization factor while designing. Also, slot loading, resistive loading, tapered feed, and curved ground have been utilized, and their effect to achieve specific antenna performance for GPR is recorded, respectively, and the results are described.


### 3.1. Effect of the Loaded Resistor

The resistive loading is used in many GPR antenna designs [7, 8], which is an effective method for bandwidth enhancement on lower frequencies while keeping the size of the antenna small. The optimal resistance value of 50 Ω is used for better impedance matching. Figure 4 shows the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) of SPA and resistively loaded slotted patch antenna (RLSPA). After the optimization process, the surface current distribution at frequency 1 GHz of the SPA and RLSPA is shown in Figure 5. However, the use of resistors may introduce extra losses in the antenna. The antenna structure is optimized by the removal of discontinuous points in the radiating structure to reduce the aperture reflections.Figure 4
The VSWR of SPA and RLSPA.Figure 5
Construction of the antenna: (a) top radiator and (b) bottom view (ground plane).
(a)(b)The loaded resistance absorbs a part of the residual current. The distributed current mainly concentrates on the tapered feed and resistively loaded slot. Therefore, a slot is introduced into the radiating structure, which produces two current loops. The resistive loading introduced in the middle of the slot enhances current by the creation of additional two small current loops, as shown in Figure5(b). The resistive loading increases the flow of current in the radiation structure.


### 3.2. Effect of the Tapered Ground

Many performance parameters are considered in an antenna design to attain a specific objective, such as the size of the radiating structure and center frequency. Some adjustments to these parameters were made, and effects on performance are recorded, respectively. Figure5 shows the effect of ground plane optimization for the bandwidth enhancement of the proposed antenna. The top corners of the ground plane are rounded to reduce aperture reflections and better impedance matching.The curved ground plane along with the tapered feeding structure is found useful in an enhancement of the lower frequency band. Therefore, in the proposed antenna optimization, the ground plane is used to enhance bandwidth. Figure6 shows the antenna impedance plot, while Figure 7 shows the time-domain characteristics of the antenna. When an amplitude-modulated Gaussian pulse is applied, the received output signal has a 0.5 ns time duration with some minor reflections.Figure 6
Impedance plot of the antenna.Figure 7
Time-domain performance of the proposed antenna.


## 3.1. Effect of the Loaded Resistor

The resistive loading is used in many GPR antenna designs [7, 8], which is an effective method for bandwidth enhancement on lower frequencies while keeping the size of the antenna small. The optimal resistance value of 50 Ω is used for better impedance matching. Figure 4 shows the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) of SPA and resistively loaded slotted patch antenna (RLSPA). After the optimization process, the surface current distribution at frequency 1 GHz of the SPA and RLSPA is shown in Figure 5. However, the use of resistors may introduce extra losses in the antenna. The antenna structure is optimized by the removal of discontinuous points in the radiating structure to reduce the aperture reflections.Figure 4
The VSWR of SPA and RLSPA.Figure 5
Construction of the antenna: (a) top radiator and (b) bottom view (ground plane).
(a)(b)The loaded resistance absorbs a part of the residual current. The distributed current mainly concentrates on the tapered feed and resistively loaded slot. Therefore, a slot is introduced into the radiating structure, which produces two current loops. The resistive loading introduced in the middle of the slot enhances current by the creation of additional two small current loops, as shown in Figure5(b). The resistive loading increases the flow of current in the radiation structure.


## 3.2. Effect of the Tapered Ground

Many performance parameters are considered in an antenna design to attain a specific objective, such as the size of the radiating structure and center frequency. Some adjustments to these parameters were made, and effects on performance are recorded, respectively. Figure5 shows the effect of ground plane optimization for the bandwidth enhancement of the proposed antenna. The top corners of the ground plane are rounded to reduce aperture reflections and better impedance matching.The curved ground plane along with the tapered feeding structure is found useful in an enhancement of the lower frequency band. Therefore, in the proposed antenna optimization, the ground plane is used to enhance bandwidth. Figure6 shows the antenna impedance plot, while Figure 7 shows the time-domain characteristics of the antenna. When an amplitude-modulated Gaussian pulse is applied, the received output signal has a 0.5 ns time duration with some minor reflections.Figure 6
Impedance plot of the antenna.Figure 7
Time-domain performance of the proposed antenna.


## 4. Results and Discussion

The measured reflection coefficient S11 of the fabricated reflector-backed resistively loaded slotted patch antenna (RB-RLSPA) is displayed in Figure8. The photographs of the antenna measurement setup are shown in Figure 9.Figure 8
Simulated and measured S11 of reflector-backed antenna.Figure 9
Photographs of the antenna measurement: (a) vector network analyzer (VNA) and (b) anechoic chamber.
(a)(b)The proposed antenna operates (S11 less than −10 dB) in the frequency band from 0.6 to 4.5 GHz. Generally speaking, a compact antenna structure can also reduce the antenna’s radar cross section to a certain extent, and the reflected radiation energy can illuminate the ground surface. The constructive coupling between the antenna and the reflector leads to a significant increase in the gain of the antenna [26]. The enhancement of gain over the entire frequency band is achieved with a peak gain of 7 dBi; the optimal distance between RLSPA and slotted reflector is 5 cm, as displayed in Figure 10.Figure 10
Simulated and measured gain of the proposed antenna at the different gaps between the reflector and the antenna.Despite the reflector, the ultrawideband operation of the proposed antenna is maintained. Figure11 shows the simulated and measured radiation pattern of the proposed reflector-backed antenna design at 1 GHz, 2 GHz, 3 GHz, and 4 GHz. As it can be observed, the radiation plots are directional at lower frequencies such as 1 and 2 GHz. The performance of the proposed antenna is compared with preexisting antennas, and analysis is presented in Table 1.Figure 11
Simulated and measured E-plane radiation pattern of reflector-backed RLSPA: (a) 1 GHz; (b) 2 GHz; (c) 3 GHz; (d) 4 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Table 1
Proposed antenna’s comparative analysis with already existing antennas.
ReferenceShapeAntenna dimensions (cm3)Frequency (GHz)Peak gain (dBi)Complexity/ease of manufacturingReflector type[4]Horn25 × 18 × 180.6 to 69.91Complex/costlyNo[6]Cone15.8 × 15.8 × 17.40.5 to 34.4Complex/costlyNo[7]Sinuous10 × 10 × 92 to 67ComplexNo[9]Slot10.7 × 7 × 51.4 to 3.56SimplePlanner[11]Bowtie27 × 18 × 110.5 to 312Complex/costlyCavity[12]Bow tie20 × 15 × 40.98 to 4.510.3SimpleCavity[26]Patch20.5 × 20.5 × 120.4336SimpleReactive impedance surface(RIS)Proposed designTapered feed18 × 22 × 50.6 to 4.67SimplePlanner


### 4.1. Experiment

The performance of the proposed antenna has been evaluated above sandy soil, as shown in Figure12 [17]. The proposed antenna is placed on the sand surface, whereas a loop antenna as an electromagnetic field sensor was placed under the sandy surface for measurement of reflection coefficient S21 [27, 28]. The result obtained from the electromagnetic field sensor is calculated using Agilent E5071C vector network analyzer and displayed in Figure 13 [29]. Furthermore, it can be noticed that the antenna shows good parasitic coupling performance at a whole frequency band, except for some late time ringing on higher frequencies. However, the variation is too small to be significant for electromagnetic wave behavior, as the coupling levels at all frequency bands stay below −35 dB [30, 31].Figure 12
Sandbox experiment: (a) diagram of the experiment; (b) picture of the experiment.
(a)(b)Figure 13
Measured S21 returns loss of the proposed antenna.Figure14 shows the block diagram of the sandbox test setup for the antenna’s use as GPR under field conditions [10]. While experimentally testing the antenna’s ability to be used as GPR, some factors that can affect the detectability of buried objects include uneven surface, airgap between soil and antenna, and the presence of air bubbles under the target surface. Therefore, the height of the antenna above ground is kept very low so that ground acts as a dielectric part of the antenna system. The experimental setup along with the experimental results from the pulse radar system is shown in Figure 15 [9, 20]. The hyperbolic reflection curve is observed and highlighted using a red dashed circle, which indicates the detectability of subsurface targets using the proposed antenna in pair configuration [32].Figure 14
The block diagram of GPR test arrangement in the lab.Figure 15
The block diagram of GPR test arrangement in the lab.
(a)(b)(c)


## 4.1. Experiment

The performance of the proposed antenna has been evaluated above sandy soil, as shown in Figure12 [17]. The proposed antenna is placed on the sand surface, whereas a loop antenna as an electromagnetic field sensor was placed under the sandy surface for measurement of reflection coefficient S21 [27, 28]. The result obtained from the electromagnetic field sensor is calculated using Agilent E5071C vector network analyzer and displayed in Figure 13 [29]. Furthermore, it can be noticed that the antenna shows good parasitic coupling performance at a whole frequency band, except for some late time ringing on higher frequencies. However, the variation is too small to be significant for electromagnetic wave behavior, as the coupling levels at all frequency bands stay below −35 dB [30, 31].Figure 12
Sandbox experiment: (a) diagram of the experiment; (b) picture of the experiment.
(a)(b)Figure 13
Measured S21 returns loss of the proposed antenna.Figure14 shows the block diagram of the sandbox test setup for the antenna’s use as GPR under field conditions [10]. While experimentally testing the antenna’s ability to be used as GPR, some factors that can affect the detectability of buried objects include uneven surface, airgap between soil and antenna, and the presence of air bubbles under the target surface. Therefore, the height of the antenna above ground is kept very low so that ground acts as a dielectric part of the antenna system. The experimental setup along with the experimental results from the pulse radar system is shown in Figure 15 [9, 20]. The hyperbolic reflection curve is observed and highlighted using a red dashed circle, which indicates the detectability of subsurface targets using the proposed antenna in pair configuration [32].Figure 14
The block diagram of GPR test arrangement in the lab.Figure 15
The block diagram of GPR test arrangement in the lab.
(a)(b)(c)


## 5. Conclusion

In this paper, a resistive-loaded wideband slotted patch antenna with optimized performance on low frequencies is proposed for GPR applications. The proposed design provides an ultrawide bandwidth ranging from 0.6 GHz to 4.6 GHz with compact dimensions. The fabricated prototype of the antenna along with an integrated reflective surface has overall dimensions of 18 × 22 × 5 cm3. The antenna exhibits good radiation characteristics. The presented antenna is suitable for GPR due to its simple structure, eases of fabrication, and low cost. The antenna is experimentally evaluated under soil conditions, as well as its ability to detect buried objects is tested. The experimental results validate the proposed antenna’s ability to be used in GPR.



---

*Source: 3531019-2021-11-08.xml*