# Evaluation of the Impact of the Introduction of Overseas High-Level Talents on the Development of Central Cities with Artificial Neural Network

Authors: Yinpin Huang
Journal: Security and Communication Networks
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

For the central cities, the transformation and upgrading of the industrial structure, the continuous deepening of innovation capabilities, and the improvement of sustainable development capabilities, human resources are playing an increasingly important role. In the modern era, assembling an army of highly educated, high-quality, and highly talented personnel has become a practical demand of talent development strategy. In order to respond to national policies, keep up with the trend of the times, and give play to the comparative advantages of talent competition, the primary task of central cities is to do a good job in the introduction of overseas high-level talents. It is necessary for the central cities to establish a mechanism for the introduction of overseas high-level talents with the government as an important task and to formulate targeted talent introduction policies according to the local characteristics of the central cities. It is very important to evaluate the impact of the introduction of overseas high-level talents on the development of central cities so that the central cities can formulate talent introduction strategies according to the actual situation. This work uses an artificial neural network to evaluate the impact of the introduction of overseas high-level talents on the development of central cities. Aiming at the problem that the evaluation accuracy and computing efficiency of the deep learning-based method decrease due to the proliferation of neural network layers, and the improved residual network model is proposed. On the one hand, a multiscale feature fusion block is designed in the first layer of the network model, which can extract the multiscale feature information in the original special. On the other hand, the residual block is optimized and improved by using depthwise separable convolution to remove the computational burden on the network.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Talents play a vital role in economic and social development and are an important driving force for social development and progress, especially in modern society with the explosion of knowledge. A Harvard professor pointed out that when the economy enters the era of the knowledge economy and informationization, talents, will be the key to solving the bottleneck problem of development and enhancing the international competitive advantage. It can be seen that, for a country, the competition for comprehensive national strength is the competition of talents. For the central cities, the competition for their comprehensive economic strength is also a competition for talents in the final analysis. The outstanding talents are overseas high-level talents. Because of their unique qualities and advantages in overcoming key technical problems, independently developing high-tech projects, and promoting the transformation and application of scientific research achievements, their quantity and quality have become a guarantee for a city. It is an important force for the sustainable, steady, and healthy development of a country’s economy. High-level and high-quality talents in different industries and fields are the core elements of economic and social innovation and development in central cities. Innovation is the primary driving force for development, and talent is the primary resource supporting development. At present, the national economic growth mode is changing from the input of labor, land, currency, and other factors to innovation-driven, but the essence of innovation-driven is talent-driven. The government clearly proposes innovative development and accelerates the construction of a country with strong talents. This series of decisions and deployments further demonstrates the country’s extreme emphasis and firm determination on talent work. It can be seen that talents, especially high-level talents, have become an important strategic resource for the country’s innovative development and an indispensable force for realizing the goals of the national government. At the same time, talents are an important group that can achieve major breakthroughs through policy adjustment [1–5].Western developed countries have long realized the importance of talent. From the middle of the 20th century, they have adjusted their national policies one after another and began to track and introduce large-scale and high-level talents around the world. Its specific performance is to provide foreign high-level talents with generous remuneration and naturalization policies and to provide excellent high-end young talents with convenience for exchange, study, scientific research, and other policy measures. China’s overseas high-level talent introduction has gone through a relatively long and complicated process. In 2008, China proposed the implementation of the national “Thousand Talents Plan,” ushering in the spring of vigorous development of high-level talent introduction. In this context, the central city governments at all levels have also placed talents in an important position to enhance the city’s core competitiveness. Many cities have formulated and introduced policies for the introduction and cultivation of overseas high-level talents in accordance with local economic development trends and the need for industrial structure adjustment and upgrading in order to promote the development, transformation, and upgrading of local industries [6–10].Compared with the developed coastal cities, there is still a large gap in the talent competitiveness of the central cities, and the talent competition index is relatively low. This is not compatible with the construction of a modern and open industrial system in central cities, and the talent policy still faces many problems. For example, the level of policy effectiveness is low, the regional characteristics of the policy are not obvious, the policy content is more important than the introduction, and the policy evaluation mechanism needs to be improved. This series of problems will make it difficult to attract and retain high-level talents. How to improve the high-level talent introduction policies in central cities, optimize the content of talent introduction policies, strengthen the effectiveness of talent policies at different levels, and promote the economic and social development of central cities [11–14].In this context, how to evaluate the impact of the introduction of overseas high-level talents on the development of central cities is very important. This is helpful for local governments to grasp the formulation of relevant talent introduction policies and is conducive to the high-level economic and cultural development of central cities. In recent years, neural networks have developed rapidly and are widely used in various industries. Therefore, this project designs a neural network to evaluate the impact of the introduction of overseas high-level talents on the development of central cities. Therefore, the application of convolutional neural networks in visualization research such as image classification is more and more extensive [15–18], which further promotes the development of artificial intelligence.The paper organizations are as follows: Section2 defines the related work. Section 3 discusses the methods of the proposed work. Section 4 discusses the experimental analysis. Section 5 concludes the article.


## 2. Related Work

In literature [19], CNN was first proposed to solve the problem of handwritten digit recognition. It applies the backpropagation to the neural network model and has a classic convolutional neural network called LeNet-5 [20]. This model also lays the structural foundation for the development of convolutional neural networks [21]. The convolutional neural network has a strong processing ability in visualization problems such as image classification. It can deeply learn the data itself and has multiple hidden layers, so it has a stronger ability to learn data features. The layered function can solve difficult research problems, especially in training deeper neural networks. Therefore, the application of convolutional neural networks in visualization research such as image classification is more and more extensive [15–18], which further promotes the development of artificial intelligence.Reference [22] proposed the LeNet model, whose earliest generation also means that the model has certain defects. Its network layers are relatively shallow, so there are few parameters and obvious disadvantages in classification problems. Reference [23] proposed the AlexNet model, which was trained by Krizhevsky et al. in the ImageNet-2012 competition. With a total of 650,000 neurons, the model comprises incredibly deep convolutional layers that are extremely sensitive to picture characteristics. Local response normalization, dropout random deactivation, max-pooling, ReLU nonlinear activation, and other principles are used in the training process. These concepts are first proposed and defined by this model. All the models in training uses GPU acceleration to improve the gradient descent speed of the model, which greatly avoids the possibility of gradient divergence to a certain extent. These improvements drive the further development of neural networks. Reference [24] proposed the VGGNet model. The model inherits the simple and effective structure of AlexNet by stacking 3 × 3 convolution kernels followed by a 2 × 2 max-pooling structure. The VGGNet model usually uses a small convolution kernel and a large kernel, so the use of a small convolution kernel can reduce the training parameters to achieve the advantage of reducing the amount of calculation.Reference [25] proposed the GoogLeNet model. The biggest difference between this model and the above network model is that Google Net not only extends the depth but also expands the width of the network. The performance of the model is improved by this double extension. The network depth reaches 22 layers, and the structure is composed of multiple Inception modules stacked. The Inception module uses convolution kernels of different sizes to perform convolution operations on the output of the previous layer to obtain multiscale features. This module uses a 1 × 1 convolution kernel for feature reduction, which reduces the calculation amount of the module and improves performance by improving the parameter utilization. Reference [26] proposed the ResNet model, which has structures of different depths. In deep learning, as network layers deepen, performance is better, so the method of the deepening network layers is usually used to improve the ability to learn features. But there are problems, such as gradient disappearance and gradient explosion. The researchers proposed the residual network structure of the ResNet model. Its structure contains residual blocks, which can avoid these situations and ensure that the model’s performance can be improved when the number of layers is deepened. Reference [27] proposed the DenseNet model, which consists of several interconnected dense blocks. The input of each dense block is the output of all the previous dense blocks, which realizes the close connection between blocks [28]. This unique structure enables the DenseNet network to use the feature information repeatedly so that the feature information can fully play its role and avoid the loss of the feature information [29].


## 3. Method

### 3.1. Convolutional Neural Network

A neural network (ANN) is a computer system based on biological neural networks that perform data analysis by training and learning from samples of data. Every NN is composed of a large number of nodes called neurons connected to each other. Each node corresponds to an activation function, and every two connected nodes correspond to the weighting function of the connected signal, that is, the weight. The deep learning models have a similar structure to NNs, with one notable difference being that the former has more hidden layers, thus showing better handling of imprecise and ambiguous information.With the development of computer vision technology, CNN has become increasingly mature and common as one of the deep learning techniques. CNN is playing an increasingly important role. CNN is a classic feed-forward neural network. The training process includes forward feature extraction and error back-propagation. By minimizing the loss error of the output layer and adjusting the weights layer-by-layer in reverse, the optimal performance of the model is finally achieved.Convolution was originally used in signal processing. Convolution is a matrix computation, which includes the multiplication and addition of matrices. The purpose of convolution operations is feature learning, and this operation is related to matrices defined as the convolutional kernels. A convolution kernel is a trainable feature extractor whose output is often referred to as a feature map. The convolution kernel performs a convolution operation on the output of the previous layer and extracts learned features to the next layer. The convolutional layer realizes sparse connection and parameter sharing in the process of data layer-by-layer transmission, which greatly reduces the computational complexity. The operation process of the convolutional layer can be expressed as following equation:(1)yjl=f∑inyi,jl−1∗ki,jl+bjl,where f represents the activation function and ∗ represents the convolution operation.The pooling operation can reduce the spatial feature dimension by compressing the input feature map; thereby simplifying the computational complexity of CNN. At the same time, the pooling operation can keep the rotation and translation invariance of the features. Pooling operations are usually added after convolution operations in the network. In the pooling arena, there are a variety of options, such as average pooling, max-pooling, and the global average pooling (GAP). It is possible to handle the problem of shifting variables with GAP’s computation of the mean from a feature map, and the features learned by the network are not influenced by changes in the position of incorrect pulses while using this operation.Deep learning networks can be trained more quickly and accurately using batch normalization (BN), a feature regularization technique. It is common to utilize BN layers between the convolutional layers and the activation processes to normalize features to a predefined distribution with mean of 0 and standard deviation 1:(2)x^n=xn−ασ2+ε,yn=μx^n+β.Fully connected layers are usually added after the entire CNN architecture to collect all the features by the previous layer for classification or prediction. When used for classification tasks, the output of a fully connected layer uses the Softmax as the activation function, and when faced with prediction tasks, activation functions such as Sigmoid or ReLU can be used. In the multiclass recognition process, the Softmax cross-entropy loss is used as the objective function. To compute cross-entropy loss, use the Softmax function to take a vector of arbitrary real-valued scores as well as compress them to [0,1]. The Softmax function is defined as follows:(3)yj=exj∑i=1Nexi.


### 3.2. Residual Neural Network

ResNet won first place in 2015. As the number of layers of traditional CNN increases, the performance of the network becomes worse and worse, and the eventually degrades. The residual network solves this phenomenon of accuracy degradation caused by nonoverfitting and allows the network to be as deep as possible. Figure1 shows an identity mapping residual block.Figure 1
Residual module.The residual mapping function learned by the residual block is as follows:(4)Fx=Hx−x.At this time, the learned objective functionFx adds a parameter, but it solves the problem of gradient disappearance to a certain extent.Based on the residual network, the literature [30] optimized the residual network. As illustrated in Figure 2, the residual module has been rebuilt to include a preactivation mechanism before the weight layer; that is, placing ReLU and BN before the volume and operation. The upgraded residual network outperforms the residual network in terms of test accuracy, and it is also easier to train and have better generalization ability.Figure 2
Improved Residual module.The improved residual network retains the same residual connection method as the residual network. At the same time, the improved residual network adjusts the order of components such as BN, ReLU activation functions, and weight layers in the main path of the residual block and changes the position where the output of the residual connection acts on the main path. The residual network directly adds the output feature map after the BN layer with the output feature map; that is, output parameters of the same position of the corresponding channel are added, and finally, the nonlinear activation is performed by the ReLU as the final output of a residual block. The improved residual network sums the output of the last weight layer in the main path of the residual block as well as the output of the residual connection for the same position parameters of the corresponding channel.


### 3.3. Improved ResNet Block

The scale at which the entry of high-level foreign talent has an impact on the growth of central cities varies. With multiscale characteristics, pertinent data are represented precisely. The size of the convolution kernel in a classical CNN, on the other hand, is variable, allowing only a limited amount of feature information to be extracted. Multiscale feature information is also contained in signals that are concatenated using kernels of different sizes. Because of this, convolution kernels of varying sizes can be applied to the input signal.When building the network, an MSFFB (Multiscale Feature Fusion Block) is suggested to address these issues. Figure3 shows the two-stage architecture of MSFFB. In the first stage of multiscale feature extraction, four convolution kernels of variable sizes are utilized to recognize feature input at multiple scales. The convolution kernels have a size of 1 × 1, 3 × 3, 5 × 5, and 7 × 7. It is worth mentioning that the output lengths of different kernel sizes vary. The feature fusion procedure is MSFFB’s second stage. The cascade layer is used to cascade all of the output’s multi-scale features in order to ensure their fusion. After the cascade layer, there is one more BN layer. A convolutional layer with variable kernel sizes can be used by MSFFB to discover multiscale features and fuse multiscale feature information for input to subsequent networks.Figure 3
Architecture of MSFFB.There is a decline in ResNet performance as the number of remaining blocks grows. In comparison to the BN and activation layers, convolutional layer operations take more time. In order to increase productivity, DSC has taken the place of classical convolution. DSC [31] was created by a Google Brain intern in 2013. Both point and depth convolution are used in this convolution procedure. Convolution kernels are applied to each input channel in depthwise convolution. A 1 × 1 convolution is used to combine the depthwise convolution outputs in pointwise convolution. Convolution and merging procedures based on separation layers separate and combine DSC.The input of the DSC layer is set toN channels, the output of the depthwise convolutional layer is also N channels, and the output channel of the pointwise convolutional layer is M. The number of parameters in the DSC can be calculated as the following equation:(5)G=M×DK×DK+N.The number of parameters is reduced compared to classical convolutional layers can be calculated as the following equation:(6)ΔG=DK×DK×MN−1−NM.DSC can drastically reduce the number of parameters compared to standard convolutions, especially as the number of convolutional layers grows. While classical convolution requires a lot of processing power, DSC does not. This paper presents a strategy to replace the traditional convolution with DSC based on the aforesaid analysis. Figure4 depicts the proposed residual block architecture. The ReLU activation layer is also eliminated from the RB, thus simplifying the RB’s basic structure. DSC is applied in the residual block (RB). For residual connections, DC replaces the traditional 11 convolutions, as shown in Figure 4. The stride is 2 and the DC convolution kernel is 11. The new RB is capable of reducing the computational burden of training and testing by a large margin. With better RB, network models can be trained more quickly.Figure 4
The proposed residual block structure.


### 3.4. Improved ResNet Model

Currently, popular neural networks, such as LeNet, AlexNet, Exception, and ResNet, were originally used to process 2D image data. 1D CNNs may occasionally lose their edge on 2D signals. Also, some CNN architectures are not compatible with 1-dimensional data. Meanwhile, the DC is applicable to 2D image data. On this basis, this paper applies a 2D CNN model.The input data designed in this work is composed of 1 × 10 features, and the specific feature information is shown in Table1. Each feature is a comparison of indicators before and after the introduction of overseas high-level talents in central cities. This can effectively evaluate the impact of the introduction of overseas high-level talents.Table 1
The detailed input features.
IndexItemx1Economic level improvementx2Industrial structure optimizationx3Technological innovation and promotionx4Improvement of employment qualityx5Education level improvementx6Improvement of medical levelx7Cultural level improvementx8Improvement of transportation facilitiesx9Energy structure optimizationx10UrbanizationIt should be noted that the input feature here is a one-dimensional vector. To match the designed neural network, it needs to be extended to 2-dimensional features. This work adopts a simple and effective method, which is to directly copy the feature and expand it into a 100 × 100 image input.The improved ResNet (IResNet) design, which combines MSFFB with modified residual blocks, is shown in Figure5.Figure 5
The structure of IResNet.A linear stack of RBs receives input data after it has passed through MSFFB. RBs 4 and 7 in the planned network are connected to DC via residual connections. Once the GAP and dropout rate of 0.5 are designed, a fully connected output layer is added to the model. As a result of the dropout procedure, a convolution kernel and training process can be converted into semiconnectivity, which helps prevent overfitting. Following all the DSCs, there is a BN, a DSC with depth factor 1, and a DC with depth factor 2.In this work, there are five categories of output, which represent five different degrees of impact of the introduction of overseas high-level talents on the development of central cities.


## 3.1. Convolutional Neural Network

A neural network (ANN) is a computer system based on biological neural networks that perform data analysis by training and learning from samples of data. Every NN is composed of a large number of nodes called neurons connected to each other. Each node corresponds to an activation function, and every two connected nodes correspond to the weighting function of the connected signal, that is, the weight. The deep learning models have a similar structure to NNs, with one notable difference being that the former has more hidden layers, thus showing better handling of imprecise and ambiguous information.With the development of computer vision technology, CNN has become increasingly mature and common as one of the deep learning techniques. CNN is playing an increasingly important role. CNN is a classic feed-forward neural network. The training process includes forward feature extraction and error back-propagation. By minimizing the loss error of the output layer and adjusting the weights layer-by-layer in reverse, the optimal performance of the model is finally achieved.Convolution was originally used in signal processing. Convolution is a matrix computation, which includes the multiplication and addition of matrices. The purpose of convolution operations is feature learning, and this operation is related to matrices defined as the convolutional kernels. A convolution kernel is a trainable feature extractor whose output is often referred to as a feature map. The convolution kernel performs a convolution operation on the output of the previous layer and extracts learned features to the next layer. The convolutional layer realizes sparse connection and parameter sharing in the process of data layer-by-layer transmission, which greatly reduces the computational complexity. The operation process of the convolutional layer can be expressed as following equation:(1)yjl=f∑inyi,jl−1∗ki,jl+bjl,where f represents the activation function and ∗ represents the convolution operation.The pooling operation can reduce the spatial feature dimension by compressing the input feature map; thereby simplifying the computational complexity of CNN. At the same time, the pooling operation can keep the rotation and translation invariance of the features. Pooling operations are usually added after convolution operations in the network. In the pooling arena, there are a variety of options, such as average pooling, max-pooling, and the global average pooling (GAP). It is possible to handle the problem of shifting variables with GAP’s computation of the mean from a feature map, and the features learned by the network are not influenced by changes in the position of incorrect pulses while using this operation.Deep learning networks can be trained more quickly and accurately using batch normalization (BN), a feature regularization technique. It is common to utilize BN layers between the convolutional layers and the activation processes to normalize features to a predefined distribution with mean of 0 and standard deviation 1:(2)x^n=xn−ασ2+ε,yn=μx^n+β.Fully connected layers are usually added after the entire CNN architecture to collect all the features by the previous layer for classification or prediction. When used for classification tasks, the output of a fully connected layer uses the Softmax as the activation function, and when faced with prediction tasks, activation functions such as Sigmoid or ReLU can be used. In the multiclass recognition process, the Softmax cross-entropy loss is used as the objective function. To compute cross-entropy loss, use the Softmax function to take a vector of arbitrary real-valued scores as well as compress them to [0,1]. The Softmax function is defined as follows:(3)yj=exj∑i=1Nexi.


## 3.2. Residual Neural Network

ResNet won first place in 2015. As the number of layers of traditional CNN increases, the performance of the network becomes worse and worse, and the eventually degrades. The residual network solves this phenomenon of accuracy degradation caused by nonoverfitting and allows the network to be as deep as possible. Figure1 shows an identity mapping residual block.Figure 1
Residual module.The residual mapping function learned by the residual block is as follows:(4)Fx=Hx−x.At this time, the learned objective functionFx adds a parameter, but it solves the problem of gradient disappearance to a certain extent.Based on the residual network, the literature [30] optimized the residual network. As illustrated in Figure 2, the residual module has been rebuilt to include a preactivation mechanism before the weight layer; that is, placing ReLU and BN before the volume and operation. The upgraded residual network outperforms the residual network in terms of test accuracy, and it is also easier to train and have better generalization ability.Figure 2
Improved Residual module.The improved residual network retains the same residual connection method as the residual network. At the same time, the improved residual network adjusts the order of components such as BN, ReLU activation functions, and weight layers in the main path of the residual block and changes the position where the output of the residual connection acts on the main path. The residual network directly adds the output feature map after the BN layer with the output feature map; that is, output parameters of the same position of the corresponding channel are added, and finally, the nonlinear activation is performed by the ReLU as the final output of a residual block. The improved residual network sums the output of the last weight layer in the main path of the residual block as well as the output of the residual connection for the same position parameters of the corresponding channel.


## 3.3. Improved ResNet Block

The scale at which the entry of high-level foreign talent has an impact on the growth of central cities varies. With multiscale characteristics, pertinent data are represented precisely. The size of the convolution kernel in a classical CNN, on the other hand, is variable, allowing only a limited amount of feature information to be extracted. Multiscale feature information is also contained in signals that are concatenated using kernels of different sizes. Because of this, convolution kernels of varying sizes can be applied to the input signal.When building the network, an MSFFB (Multiscale Feature Fusion Block) is suggested to address these issues. Figure3 shows the two-stage architecture of MSFFB. In the first stage of multiscale feature extraction, four convolution kernels of variable sizes are utilized to recognize feature input at multiple scales. The convolution kernels have a size of 1 × 1, 3 × 3, 5 × 5, and 7 × 7. It is worth mentioning that the output lengths of different kernel sizes vary. The feature fusion procedure is MSFFB’s second stage. The cascade layer is used to cascade all of the output’s multi-scale features in order to ensure their fusion. After the cascade layer, there is one more BN layer. A convolutional layer with variable kernel sizes can be used by MSFFB to discover multiscale features and fuse multiscale feature information for input to subsequent networks.Figure 3
Architecture of MSFFB.There is a decline in ResNet performance as the number of remaining blocks grows. In comparison to the BN and activation layers, convolutional layer operations take more time. In order to increase productivity, DSC has taken the place of classical convolution. DSC [31] was created by a Google Brain intern in 2013. Both point and depth convolution are used in this convolution procedure. Convolution kernels are applied to each input channel in depthwise convolution. A 1 × 1 convolution is used to combine the depthwise convolution outputs in pointwise convolution. Convolution and merging procedures based on separation layers separate and combine DSC.The input of the DSC layer is set toN channels, the output of the depthwise convolutional layer is also N channels, and the output channel of the pointwise convolutional layer is M. The number of parameters in the DSC can be calculated as the following equation:(5)G=M×DK×DK+N.The number of parameters is reduced compared to classical convolutional layers can be calculated as the following equation:(6)ΔG=DK×DK×MN−1−NM.DSC can drastically reduce the number of parameters compared to standard convolutions, especially as the number of convolutional layers grows. While classical convolution requires a lot of processing power, DSC does not. This paper presents a strategy to replace the traditional convolution with DSC based on the aforesaid analysis. Figure4 depicts the proposed residual block architecture. The ReLU activation layer is also eliminated from the RB, thus simplifying the RB’s basic structure. DSC is applied in the residual block (RB). For residual connections, DC replaces the traditional 11 convolutions, as shown in Figure 4. The stride is 2 and the DC convolution kernel is 11. The new RB is capable of reducing the computational burden of training and testing by a large margin. With better RB, network models can be trained more quickly.Figure 4
The proposed residual block structure.


## 3.4. Improved ResNet Model

Currently, popular neural networks, such as LeNet, AlexNet, Exception, and ResNet, were originally used to process 2D image data. 1D CNNs may occasionally lose their edge on 2D signals. Also, some CNN architectures are not compatible with 1-dimensional data. Meanwhile, the DC is applicable to 2D image data. On this basis, this paper applies a 2D CNN model.The input data designed in this work is composed of 1 × 10 features, and the specific feature information is shown in Table1. Each feature is a comparison of indicators before and after the introduction of overseas high-level talents in central cities. This can effectively evaluate the impact of the introduction of overseas high-level talents.Table 1
The detailed input features.
IndexItemx1Economic level improvementx2Industrial structure optimizationx3Technological innovation and promotionx4Improvement of employment qualityx5Education level improvementx6Improvement of medical levelx7Cultural level improvementx8Improvement of transportation facilitiesx9Energy structure optimizationx10UrbanizationIt should be noted that the input feature here is a one-dimensional vector. To match the designed neural network, it needs to be extended to 2-dimensional features. This work adopts a simple and effective method, which is to directly copy the feature and expand it into a 100 × 100 image input.The improved ResNet (IResNet) design, which combines MSFFB with modified residual blocks, is shown in Figure5.Figure 5
The structure of IResNet.A linear stack of RBs receives input data after it has passed through MSFFB. RBs 4 and 7 in the planned network are connected to DC via residual connections. Once the GAP and dropout rate of 0.5 are designed, a fully connected output layer is added to the model. As a result of the dropout procedure, a convolution kernel and training process can be converted into semiconnectivity, which helps prevent overfitting. Following all the DSCs, there is a BN, a DSC with depth factor 1, and a DC with depth factor 2.In this work, there are five categories of output, which represent five different degrees of impact of the introduction of overseas high-level talents on the development of central cities.


## 4. Experiment

Experiments reveal cause-and-effect relationships by illustrating what happens when a particular component is changed.


### 4.1. Dataset

This work uses two different datasets DE1 and DE2, and the number of samples contained in each dataset is different. In the DE1 dataset, there are 9027 training samples and 5126 testing samples. In the DE2 dataset, there are 12731 training samples and 6103 testing samples. In this work, the evaluation metrics used are precision and F1 score.


### 4.2. Comparison of Similar Methods

To verify the effectiveness of the IResNet proposed in this work for evaluating the impact of the introduction of overseas high-level talents on the development of central cities, we first compare IResNet with other neural network methods. The comparison methods involved include the BP network, the CNN method, and the ResNet method. The experimental results are shown in Table2.Table 2
Comparison of similar methods.
MethodDE1DE2PrecisionF1PrecisionF1BP-based82.7078.9085.1082.10CNN-based86.6082.5088.3084.20ResNet-based91.2088.9092.1089.70IResNet93.7090.2095.3091.60It is easy to see that the proposed strategy can obtain the best results on both datasets. Compared with the best performing ResNet in the table, the IResNet method can achieve 2.5% precision improvement and 1.3% F1 improvement on DE1. Similarly, IResNet method can achieve 3.2% precision improvement and 1.9% F1 improvement on the DE2. This verifies the effectiveness and correctness of the IResNet method.


### 4.3. Evaluation of MSFFB

As mentioned earlier, this work uses the MSFFB structure to enhance multiscale feature information. To verify the effectiveness, this work conducts comparative experiments to compare the evaluation performed with and without MSFFB. The experimental results are illustrated in Figure6.Figure 6
Evaluation of MSFFB.It is not difficult to see that compared with not using MSFFB, IResNet achieves 1.5% precision improvement and 1.9% F1 improvement on DE1 and 1.8% precision improvement, and 1.7% F1 improvement on DE2. This proves the correctness of the MSFFB strategy used in this work.


### 4.4. Evaluation of Improved ResNet Block

As mentioned earlier, this work uses the improved ResNet block structure (IRB) to enhance feature extraction. To verify the effectiveness of this strategy, this work conducts comparative experiments to compare the evaluation performed with and without IRB. The experimental results are illustrated in Figure7.Figure 7
Evaluation of improved ResNet block.It is not difficult to see that compared with not using IRB, IResNet achieves 1.2% precision improvement and 1.5% F1 improvement on DE1 and 1.1% precision improvement and 1.1% F1 improvement on DE2. This proves the correctness of the IRB strategy.


### 4.5. Evaluation of BN Layer

This work uses the BN layer to enhance feature extraction. To verify the effectiveness, this work conducts comparative experiments to compare the evaluation performed with and without BN. The experimental results are illustrated in Figure8.Figure 8
Evaluation of BN layer.It is not difficult to see that compared with not using BN, IResNet achieves 0.8% precision improvement and 1.0% F1 improvement on the DE1 dataset and 0.5% precision improvement and 0.7% F1 improvement on the DE2 dataset. This proves the correctness of the BN strategy used in this work.


## 4.1. Dataset

This work uses two different datasets DE1 and DE2, and the number of samples contained in each dataset is different. In the DE1 dataset, there are 9027 training samples and 5126 testing samples. In the DE2 dataset, there are 12731 training samples and 6103 testing samples. In this work, the evaluation metrics used are precision and F1 score.


## 4.2. Comparison of Similar Methods

To verify the effectiveness of the IResNet proposed in this work for evaluating the impact of the introduction of overseas high-level talents on the development of central cities, we first compare IResNet with other neural network methods. The comparison methods involved include the BP network, the CNN method, and the ResNet method. The experimental results are shown in Table2.Table 2
Comparison of similar methods.
MethodDE1DE2PrecisionF1PrecisionF1BP-based82.7078.9085.1082.10CNN-based86.6082.5088.3084.20ResNet-based91.2088.9092.1089.70IResNet93.7090.2095.3091.60It is easy to see that the proposed strategy can obtain the best results on both datasets. Compared with the best performing ResNet in the table, the IResNet method can achieve 2.5% precision improvement and 1.3% F1 improvement on DE1. Similarly, IResNet method can achieve 3.2% precision improvement and 1.9% F1 improvement on the DE2. This verifies the effectiveness and correctness of the IResNet method.


## 4.3. Evaluation of MSFFB

As mentioned earlier, this work uses the MSFFB structure to enhance multiscale feature information. To verify the effectiveness, this work conducts comparative experiments to compare the evaluation performed with and without MSFFB. The experimental results are illustrated in Figure6.Figure 6
Evaluation of MSFFB.It is not difficult to see that compared with not using MSFFB, IResNet achieves 1.5% precision improvement and 1.9% F1 improvement on DE1 and 1.8% precision improvement, and 1.7% F1 improvement on DE2. This proves the correctness of the MSFFB strategy used in this work.


## 4.4. Evaluation of Improved ResNet Block

As mentioned earlier, this work uses the improved ResNet block structure (IRB) to enhance feature extraction. To verify the effectiveness of this strategy, this work conducts comparative experiments to compare the evaluation performed with and without IRB. The experimental results are illustrated in Figure7.Figure 7
Evaluation of improved ResNet block.It is not difficult to see that compared with not using IRB, IResNet achieves 1.2% precision improvement and 1.5% F1 improvement on DE1 and 1.1% precision improvement and 1.1% F1 improvement on DE2. This proves the correctness of the IRB strategy.


## 4.5. Evaluation of BN Layer

This work uses the BN layer to enhance feature extraction. To verify the effectiveness, this work conducts comparative experiments to compare the evaluation performed with and without BN. The experimental results are illustrated in Figure8.Figure 8
Evaluation of BN layer.It is not difficult to see that compared with not using BN, IResNet achieves 0.8% precision improvement and 1.0% F1 improvement on the DE1 dataset and 0.5% precision improvement and 0.7% F1 improvement on the DE2 dataset. This proves the correctness of the BN strategy used in this work.


## 5. Conclusion

For a political party, a nation, a country, and a region, talent is the first and most valuable resource. The region’s technological innovation capability and economic development level are determined by its attraction and agglomeration of highly educated and high-tech talents. High-level talents from other countries play a crucial role in boosting the economic, cultural, scientific, and technical growth of key cities. As a result, how effective is it for local governments and businesses in core cities to introduce and retain abroad high-level talent in order to fulfill the objective of comprehensive and rapid economic and social development. Local governments and businesses in central cities must assess the impact of bringing in high-level foreign talent on urban growth in order to build more optimized strategies for talent introduction. Taking this as a starting point, this work is committed to designing an intelligent algorithm based on an artificial neural network to evaluate the impact of the introduction of overseas high-level talents on urban development. This work proposes an improved residual network to study the impact of overseas high-level talents on the development of central cities. Firstly, a multiscale feature fusion block is constructed to mine the multiscale data feature information in the input data to improve the pattern recognition ability of the model. Secondly, to increase the model’s running speed, an improved residual block is built using depthwise separable convolution and depthwise convolution.



---

*Source: 3495179-2022-05-19.xml*