# Antifungal Activity of ZnO and MgO Nanomaterials and Their Mixtures againstColletotrichum gloeosporioides Strains from Tropical Fruit

Authors: Susana C. De la Rosa-García; Pablo Martínez-Torres; Sergio Gómez-Cornelio; Mario Alberto Corral-Aguado; Patricia Quintana; Nikte M. Gómez-Ortíz
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Avocado (Persea americana) and papaya (Carica papaya) are tropical fruits with high international demand. However, these commercially important crops are affected by the fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, which causes anthracnose and results in significant economic losses. The antifungal activity of metal oxide nanomaterials (zinc oxide (ZnO), magnesium oxide (MgO), and ZnO:MgO and ZnO:Mg(OH)2 composites) prepared under different conditions of synthesis was evaluated against strains of C. gloeosporioides obtained from papaya and avocado. All nanoparticles (NPs) at the tested concentrations significantly inhibited the germination of conidia and caused structural damage to the fungal cells. According to the radial growth test, the fungal strain obtained from avocado was more susceptible to the NPs than the strain obtained from papaya. The effect of the tested NPs on the fungal strains confirmed that these NPs could be used as strong antifungal agents against C. gloeosporioides to control anthracnose in tropical fruits.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides is a phytopathogenic agent that causes anthracnose disease in several fruits and crops, including avocado, papaya, mango, pitaya, tomatoes, citrus, and almonds, among others [1–3]. The anthracnose pathogen invades the leaves, flowers, and fruits during preharvest and also invades postharvest fresh products [4]. The severity of the disease is related with environmental conditions. The most severe attacks on fruits or crops occur when crops are most susceptible (e.g., during flowering and/or fruiting) and under conditions of high humidity (e.g., during the rainy season). Meanwhile, the fungus is inactive under dry climate conditions, sunlight, and extreme temperatures [3].The symptoms of anthracnose depend on the affected plant and its physiology. The symptoms of anthracnose in papaya (Carica papaya L.) include sunken spots of different colors on the leaves and necrosis on the stems, fruits, or flowers, which often result in the wilting or death of plant tissues. In avocado (Persea americana), the fungus mainly infects small fruits growing in orchards; conidia are deposited on small fruits, germinate, and form appressoria. Anthracnose does not fully develop until fruits mature yet eventually results in the appearance of sunken necrotic black spots [5].Synthetic fungicides are used to protect harvests from such fungal diseases. However, these can potentially contaminate soils and water and can present potential risks for human and animal health [6]. Furthermore, fungi have developed resistance to several commercial fungicides [7], resulting in important economic losses. This problem has led to the search of new technologies and antimicrobial agents, such as nanomaterials, to control fungal infections in crops.Currently, nanotechnology could have the potential to revolutionize the agriculture and food industry, to provide new tools to treat phytopathogenic diseases, and to enhance the ability of plants to absorb nutrients [8]. Several nanomaterials have been shown to have antifungal properties like silver [9, 10], copper [11, 12], zincite [13, 14], titania [15], nickel, and core-shell Ag-SiO2 [16]. The nanoparticles (NPs) may be good candidates as fungicides in crops, by their unique physical and chemical properties, which often differ significantly from their bulk properties [17, 18]. For example, the size of NPs affects the optical, catalytic, and electronic properties of these materials [19, 20] that can provide different antifungal effects.In particular, inorganic metal oxides such as MgO and ZnO have attracted interest as antimicrobial agents because of their safety and stability [21]. However, several physical and chemical methods are used for the synthesis of NPs and may provide nanoparticles of different morphologies and sizes. In this work, we synthesized ZnO powder using both coprecipitation and hydrothermal methods, while the MgO powder was only prepared by coprecipitation. We got ZnO and MgO nanoparticles with different sizes and morphologies and determined their antifungal properties against the causal agent of anthracnose, C. gloeosporioides isolated from avocado leaves and papaya fruits.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Synthesis of Metal Oxides

#### 2.1.1. Synthesis of Metal Oxides by Coprecipitation Method

Zinc and magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (denoted as X(NO3)·6H2O with X = Zn or Mg) were used as precursors to obtain ZnO and MgO NPs, and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was used as a precipitating agent.Specifically, the coprecipitation of ZnO and MgO was performed following the method of Tamilsevi [22]. Briefly, the NPs were synthesized as follows: a solution of 0.4 M NaOH (Aldrich, 98%) was added drop by drop to a solution of 0.2 M X(NO3)·6H2O (Aldrich, 98%) under constant stirring at two different temperatures of synthesis (25°C and 70°C).To formulate the ZnO/MgO composites, a mixture of 0.2 M Zn(NO3)·6H2O and Mg(NO3)·6H2O (1 : 1) was reacted with 0.8 M NaOH drop by drop under constant stirring at two different temperatures of synthesis (25°C and 70°C).


#### 2.1.2. Synthesis of Metal Oxides by Hydrothermal Method

The hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO NPs was also performed as follows: 100 mL of 0.2 M Zn(NO3)·6H2O water solution was added drop by drop to 100 mL of 0.4 M NaOH (Aldrich, 98%) under constant stirring. This reaction was hydrothermally treated in a Teflon cup enclosed in a stainless steel pressure vessel (Parr, 4749). The hydrothermal treatments were carried out at temperatures of 100°C and 160°C for 24 h to modify and control the average particle size.To formulate the ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composites, a mixture of 0.2 M Zn(NO3)·6H2O and Mg(NO3)·6H2O (1 : 1) was reacted with 0.8 M NaOH drop by drop under constant stirring at two different temperatures of synthesis (25°C and 70°C). The reaction was hydrothermally treated at 100°C or 160°C for 24 h.Following the methods described above, all samples were centrifuged and washed using distilled water (18 MΩ·cm) and ethanol (1 : 1), and the resultant precipitates were dried at 50°C. The samples obtained by the coprecipitation method were calcined in a programmable muffle furnace at 500°C or 1000°C with a constant heating rate of 5°C/min and a 2 h dwell time.The main features of the methods used to synthesize these nanomaterials are presented in Table1.Table 1
Methods of synthesis of different metal oxide nanomaterials.
Material
Method of synthesis
Sample
Temperature of synthesis(°C)
Hydrothermal treatment(°C)/time (h)
Calcination(°C)
MgO
Coprecipitation
S1
70
—
500
S2
70
—
1000
ZnO
Coprecipitation
S3
25
—
500
S4
70
—
1000
Hydrothermal
S5
25
100/24
—
S6
25
160/24
—
ZnO/Mg(OH)2
Hydrothermal
S7
25
100/24
—
S8
25
160/24
—
S9
70
100/24
—
S10
70
160/24
—
ZnO/MgO
Coprecipitation
S11
25
—
500
S12
70
—
500
S13
70
—
1000


### 2.2. Characterization of Nanoparticles

The phase composition of the oxide NPs was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D5000 Siemens) with Bragg-Brentano geometry and Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) under the following scan parameters: step size = 0.02°, t = 5 s, and 20° ≤ 2θ ≤ 80°. The phase analysis of the materials was carried out before the antifungal evaluation. The crystallite size, r, was also calculated using the Scherrer equation:
(1)r=0.9λ2Bcosθ,where λ is the wavelength of the radiation source, θ is the angle of reflection, and B is the peak width (FWHM; in radians) corrected for instrument broadening and determined from the spectra of large crystallites of the same materials (Βins=2.9×10−3rad).Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-7600F) was used to determine the morphology and size of the NPs. To collect SEM images, the nanomaterials were suspended in deionized water and ultrasonicated for about 10 min. Then, a drop of this solution was deposited onto graphite paper, and the images were taken.


### 2.3. Isolation and Identification of Strains Caused by Anthracnose

Fungi were isolated from avocado leaves (Persea americana) and papaya fruits (Carica papaya) with characteristics symptoms of anthracnose from the states of Michoacan and Campeche, Mexico, respectively.Tiny black spots of papaya fruit were incubated at 28°C for three days in a humidity chamber to increase the infected areas. Avocado leaves with lesions typical of anthracnose were washed in running tap water and surface sterilized by immersing and agitating in 70% ethanol for 1 min and in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 min followed by 3 washes in sterile distilled water for 5 min each.The black spots on papaya fruits and avocado leaves were removed (1 × 1 cm2) using a sterile scalpel and deposited onto potato dextrose agar (PDA, Difco) amended with chloramphenicol (50 μg/L) to suppress bacterial growth. The samples were incubated at 25°C for 10–15 days. The fungal hyphal tips growing in this prior culture were then transferred to fresh PDA without antibiotic and incubated again.The isolated strains were identified by their micro- and macroscopic morphologies asColletotrichum gloeosporioides according to Sutton and Weir et al. [23, 24].


### 2.4. Assay of Pathogenic Activity and Profiles of Susceptibility

All isolates were conducted to pathogenicity tests. Koch’s postulates were used to confirm anthracnose on avocado and papaya fruits, and the fungal strains were labeled as AP-14 and PG-16, respectively. Fruits were evaluated by the presence or absence of lesions, and diseased fruits were submitted to reisolation to confirm the presence of the pathogen in infected tissues and completed by the Koch’s Postulates.The profile of susceptibility of both strains ofC. gloeosporioides was evaluated with different commercial fungicides commonly used to prevent and control anthracnose in orchards for comparing with the synthesized NPs.The commercial fungicides were prochloraz (Mirage® 40 EC (1-[N-propyl-N-[2-(2,4,6-trichlorophenoxy)ethyl]carbomoyl]imidazole) ADAMA, Chile) and benomyl (Benomyl 50 pH Antrak® (methyl 1-(butylcarbamoyl)benzimidazol-2-yl-carbamate) Agroquímica Tridente, Mexico) at concentrations of 1000, 100, 10, and 1μg/mL.


### 2.5.In Vitro Antifungal Assay

#### 2.5.1. Broth Microdilution Method

TheC. gloeosporioides inocula of both strains were grown on PDA plates at 28°C for 5–10 days. Fungal growth from the plates was flooded with sterile saline solution (0.85%) and gently scraped with a sterile slide. Under aseptic conditions, the conidial suspensions were filtered through sterile gauze to remove mycelia. The number of conidia in the filtered material was counted in a Neubauer chamber and adjusted to a final concentration of 1 × 106 conidia/mL by adding potato dextrose broth (PDB, Difco).Thein vitro antifungal activity was determined by calculating the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the synthesized nanomaterials [25] using microdilution methods in culture broth, following the M38-A2 protocol of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute® (CLSI). All NPs were dissolved in DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and diluted in sterile 96-well plates (Nunc F96 microtiter plates) with PDB in a geometric progression from 2 to 2048 times. Thus, the wells contained 100 μL of PDB with different concentrations of NPs in serial 2-fold dilutions (5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, 0.312, 0.156, 0.078, 0.039, 0.019, 0.009, 0.004, and 0.002 mg/mL). After the NPs were diluted, 100 μL suspensions of 1 × 105 conidia/mL were inoculated. Prochloraz was used as the positive control and DMSO as the negative control. The assays were performed in triplicate and were incubated for 48 h at 28°C. The MIC end-point criterion for each fungus was defined as the lowest concentration of fungal growth and was determined visually by optical microscopy.The fungicidal activity was then determined by calculating the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of the NPs with fungicidal or fungistatic action. A fungicidal agent kills cells at concentrations similar to its MIC. Conversely, a fungistatic compound may be unable to kill all fungal cells despite having a strong MIC. After the MIC measurements, the MFCs were established by taking 5μL of each well with no visible fungal growth and inoculating it on a fresh PDA medium. After incubation for 72 h at 28°C, the number of surviving organisms was determined. The MFC was defined as the lowest concentration at which 99.9% of the fungus was killed.


#### 2.5.2. Effect of Nanoparticles on Mycelial Radial Growth

The effect of the synthesized nanomaterials on the inhibition of the mycelial growth of the two evaluated strains ofC. gloeosporioides was also determined. The evaluated treatments were as follows: (1) culture medium without treatment (negative control), (2) culture media with two commercial fungicides (positive controls), and (3) culture media with three MICs of NPs (0.625, 0.312, and 0.156 mg/mL) according to the broth microdilution assay.The evaluated NP concentrations were added to culture media that were cooled to 50°C prior to being placed in Petri dishes (90 mm diameter × 15 mm thick). One day later, the center of each dish was inoculated with an agar disk (6 mm diameter) bearing mycelial growth from an 8-day-oldC. gloeosporioides culture. The experiment was carried out in triplicate and incubated at 28°C for nine days. The radial inhibition rate was calculated when the mycelial growth of the control plate reached the edge of the Petri dish using the equation R−r/R×100% [26], where R is the radial growth of the fungal mycelia on the control plate and r is the radial growth of fungal mycelia on plates treated with NPs or commercial fungicides. From these assays, slides were prepared to analyze the structural damage to fungi resulting from the NPs via optical microscopy (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and atomic force microscopy (AFM, NT-MDT-NTEGRA Prima, Russia). The AFM images were captured under ambient conditions (RH = 45%, T = 25°C) using a R-TESPA probe (Bruker) in semicontact mode with a spring constant of k = 40 N/m at a scanning rate of 0.7 Hz. The images were analyzed in the NOVA 1.1.0.1921 software.


## 2.1. Synthesis of Metal Oxides

### 2.1.1. Synthesis of Metal Oxides by Coprecipitation Method

Zinc and magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (denoted as X(NO3)·6H2O with X = Zn or Mg) were used as precursors to obtain ZnO and MgO NPs, and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was used as a precipitating agent.Specifically, the coprecipitation of ZnO and MgO was performed following the method of Tamilsevi [22]. Briefly, the NPs were synthesized as follows: a solution of 0.4 M NaOH (Aldrich, 98%) was added drop by drop to a solution of 0.2 M X(NO3)·6H2O (Aldrich, 98%) under constant stirring at two different temperatures of synthesis (25°C and 70°C).To formulate the ZnO/MgO composites, a mixture of 0.2 M Zn(NO3)·6H2O and Mg(NO3)·6H2O (1 : 1) was reacted with 0.8 M NaOH drop by drop under constant stirring at two different temperatures of synthesis (25°C and 70°C).


### 2.1.2. Synthesis of Metal Oxides by Hydrothermal Method

The hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO NPs was also performed as follows: 100 mL of 0.2 M Zn(NO3)·6H2O water solution was added drop by drop to 100 mL of 0.4 M NaOH (Aldrich, 98%) under constant stirring. This reaction was hydrothermally treated in a Teflon cup enclosed in a stainless steel pressure vessel (Parr, 4749). The hydrothermal treatments were carried out at temperatures of 100°C and 160°C for 24 h to modify and control the average particle size.To formulate the ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composites, a mixture of 0.2 M Zn(NO3)·6H2O and Mg(NO3)·6H2O (1 : 1) was reacted with 0.8 M NaOH drop by drop under constant stirring at two different temperatures of synthesis (25°C and 70°C). The reaction was hydrothermally treated at 100°C or 160°C for 24 h.Following the methods described above, all samples were centrifuged and washed using distilled water (18 MΩ·cm) and ethanol (1 : 1), and the resultant precipitates were dried at 50°C. The samples obtained by the coprecipitation method were calcined in a programmable muffle furnace at 500°C or 1000°C with a constant heating rate of 5°C/min and a 2 h dwell time.The main features of the methods used to synthesize these nanomaterials are presented in Table1.Table 1
Methods of synthesis of different metal oxide nanomaterials.
Material
Method of synthesis
Sample
Temperature of synthesis(°C)
Hydrothermal treatment(°C)/time (h)
Calcination(°C)
MgO
Coprecipitation
S1
70
—
500
S2
70
—
1000
ZnO
Coprecipitation
S3
25
—
500
S4
70
—
1000
Hydrothermal
S5
25
100/24
—
S6
25
160/24
—
ZnO/Mg(OH)2
Hydrothermal
S7
25
100/24
—
S8
25
160/24
—
S9
70
100/24
—
S10
70
160/24
—
ZnO/MgO
Coprecipitation
S11
25
—
500
S12
70
—
500
S13
70
—
1000


## 2.1.1. Synthesis of Metal Oxides by Coprecipitation Method

Zinc and magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (denoted as X(NO3)·6H2O with X = Zn or Mg) were used as precursors to obtain ZnO and MgO NPs, and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was used as a precipitating agent.Specifically, the coprecipitation of ZnO and MgO was performed following the method of Tamilsevi [22]. Briefly, the NPs were synthesized as follows: a solution of 0.4 M NaOH (Aldrich, 98%) was added drop by drop to a solution of 0.2 M X(NO3)·6H2O (Aldrich, 98%) under constant stirring at two different temperatures of synthesis (25°C and 70°C).To formulate the ZnO/MgO composites, a mixture of 0.2 M Zn(NO3)·6H2O and Mg(NO3)·6H2O (1 : 1) was reacted with 0.8 M NaOH drop by drop under constant stirring at two different temperatures of synthesis (25°C and 70°C).


## 2.1.2. Synthesis of Metal Oxides by Hydrothermal Method

The hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO NPs was also performed as follows: 100 mL of 0.2 M Zn(NO3)·6H2O water solution was added drop by drop to 100 mL of 0.4 M NaOH (Aldrich, 98%) under constant stirring. This reaction was hydrothermally treated in a Teflon cup enclosed in a stainless steel pressure vessel (Parr, 4749). The hydrothermal treatments were carried out at temperatures of 100°C and 160°C for 24 h to modify and control the average particle size.To formulate the ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composites, a mixture of 0.2 M Zn(NO3)·6H2O and Mg(NO3)·6H2O (1 : 1) was reacted with 0.8 M NaOH drop by drop under constant stirring at two different temperatures of synthesis (25°C and 70°C). The reaction was hydrothermally treated at 100°C or 160°C for 24 h.Following the methods described above, all samples were centrifuged and washed using distilled water (18 MΩ·cm) and ethanol (1 : 1), and the resultant precipitates were dried at 50°C. The samples obtained by the coprecipitation method were calcined in a programmable muffle furnace at 500°C or 1000°C with a constant heating rate of 5°C/min and a 2 h dwell time.The main features of the methods used to synthesize these nanomaterials are presented in Table1.Table 1
Methods of synthesis of different metal oxide nanomaterials.
Material
Method of synthesis
Sample
Temperature of synthesis(°C)
Hydrothermal treatment(°C)/time (h)
Calcination(°C)
MgO
Coprecipitation
S1
70
—
500
S2
70
—
1000
ZnO
Coprecipitation
S3
25
—
500
S4
70
—
1000
Hydrothermal
S5
25
100/24
—
S6
25
160/24
—
ZnO/Mg(OH)2
Hydrothermal
S7
25
100/24
—
S8
25
160/24
—
S9
70
100/24
—
S10
70
160/24
—
ZnO/MgO
Coprecipitation
S11
25
—
500
S12
70
—
500
S13
70
—
1000


## 2.2. Characterization of Nanoparticles

The phase composition of the oxide NPs was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D5000 Siemens) with Bragg-Brentano geometry and Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) under the following scan parameters: step size = 0.02°, t = 5 s, and 20° ≤ 2θ ≤ 80°. The phase analysis of the materials was carried out before the antifungal evaluation. The crystallite size, r, was also calculated using the Scherrer equation:
(1)r=0.9λ2Bcosθ,where λ is the wavelength of the radiation source, θ is the angle of reflection, and B is the peak width (FWHM; in radians) corrected for instrument broadening and determined from the spectra of large crystallites of the same materials (Βins=2.9×10−3rad).Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-7600F) was used to determine the morphology and size of the NPs. To collect SEM images, the nanomaterials were suspended in deionized water and ultrasonicated for about 10 min. Then, a drop of this solution was deposited onto graphite paper, and the images were taken.


## 2.3. Isolation and Identification of Strains Caused by Anthracnose

Fungi were isolated from avocado leaves (Persea americana) and papaya fruits (Carica papaya) with characteristics symptoms of anthracnose from the states of Michoacan and Campeche, Mexico, respectively.Tiny black spots of papaya fruit were incubated at 28°C for three days in a humidity chamber to increase the infected areas. Avocado leaves with lesions typical of anthracnose were washed in running tap water and surface sterilized by immersing and agitating in 70% ethanol for 1 min and in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 min followed by 3 washes in sterile distilled water for 5 min each.The black spots on papaya fruits and avocado leaves were removed (1 × 1 cm2) using a sterile scalpel and deposited onto potato dextrose agar (PDA, Difco) amended with chloramphenicol (50 μg/L) to suppress bacterial growth. The samples were incubated at 25°C for 10–15 days. The fungal hyphal tips growing in this prior culture were then transferred to fresh PDA without antibiotic and incubated again.The isolated strains were identified by their micro- and macroscopic morphologies asColletotrichum gloeosporioides according to Sutton and Weir et al. [23, 24].


## 2.4. Assay of Pathogenic Activity and Profiles of Susceptibility

All isolates were conducted to pathogenicity tests. Koch’s postulates were used to confirm anthracnose on avocado and papaya fruits, and the fungal strains were labeled as AP-14 and PG-16, respectively. Fruits were evaluated by the presence or absence of lesions, and diseased fruits were submitted to reisolation to confirm the presence of the pathogen in infected tissues and completed by the Koch’s Postulates.The profile of susceptibility of both strains ofC. gloeosporioides was evaluated with different commercial fungicides commonly used to prevent and control anthracnose in orchards for comparing with the synthesized NPs.The commercial fungicides were prochloraz (Mirage® 40 EC (1-[N-propyl-N-[2-(2,4,6-trichlorophenoxy)ethyl]carbomoyl]imidazole) ADAMA, Chile) and benomyl (Benomyl 50 pH Antrak® (methyl 1-(butylcarbamoyl)benzimidazol-2-yl-carbamate) Agroquímica Tridente, Mexico) at concentrations of 1000, 100, 10, and 1μg/mL.


## 2.5.In Vitro Antifungal Assay

### 2.5.1. Broth Microdilution Method

TheC. gloeosporioides inocula of both strains were grown on PDA plates at 28°C for 5–10 days. Fungal growth from the plates was flooded with sterile saline solution (0.85%) and gently scraped with a sterile slide. Under aseptic conditions, the conidial suspensions were filtered through sterile gauze to remove mycelia. The number of conidia in the filtered material was counted in a Neubauer chamber and adjusted to a final concentration of 1 × 106 conidia/mL by adding potato dextrose broth (PDB, Difco).Thein vitro antifungal activity was determined by calculating the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the synthesized nanomaterials [25] using microdilution methods in culture broth, following the M38-A2 protocol of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute® (CLSI). All NPs were dissolved in DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and diluted in sterile 96-well plates (Nunc F96 microtiter plates) with PDB in a geometric progression from 2 to 2048 times. Thus, the wells contained 100 μL of PDB with different concentrations of NPs in serial 2-fold dilutions (5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, 0.312, 0.156, 0.078, 0.039, 0.019, 0.009, 0.004, and 0.002 mg/mL). After the NPs were diluted, 100 μL suspensions of 1 × 105 conidia/mL were inoculated. Prochloraz was used as the positive control and DMSO as the negative control. The assays were performed in triplicate and were incubated for 48 h at 28°C. The MIC end-point criterion for each fungus was defined as the lowest concentration of fungal growth and was determined visually by optical microscopy.The fungicidal activity was then determined by calculating the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of the NPs with fungicidal or fungistatic action. A fungicidal agent kills cells at concentrations similar to its MIC. Conversely, a fungistatic compound may be unable to kill all fungal cells despite having a strong MIC. After the MIC measurements, the MFCs were established by taking 5μL of each well with no visible fungal growth and inoculating it on a fresh PDA medium. After incubation for 72 h at 28°C, the number of surviving organisms was determined. The MFC was defined as the lowest concentration at which 99.9% of the fungus was killed.


### 2.5.2. Effect of Nanoparticles on Mycelial Radial Growth

The effect of the synthesized nanomaterials on the inhibition of the mycelial growth of the two evaluated strains ofC. gloeosporioides was also determined. The evaluated treatments were as follows: (1) culture medium without treatment (negative control), (2) culture media with two commercial fungicides (positive controls), and (3) culture media with three MICs of NPs (0.625, 0.312, and 0.156 mg/mL) according to the broth microdilution assay.The evaluated NP concentrations were added to culture media that were cooled to 50°C prior to being placed in Petri dishes (90 mm diameter × 15 mm thick). One day later, the center of each dish was inoculated with an agar disk (6 mm diameter) bearing mycelial growth from an 8-day-oldC. gloeosporioides culture. The experiment was carried out in triplicate and incubated at 28°C for nine days. The radial inhibition rate was calculated when the mycelial growth of the control plate reached the edge of the Petri dish using the equation R−r/R×100% [26], where R is the radial growth of the fungal mycelia on the control plate and r is the radial growth of fungal mycelia on plates treated with NPs or commercial fungicides. From these assays, slides were prepared to analyze the structural damage to fungi resulting from the NPs via optical microscopy (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and atomic force microscopy (AFM, NT-MDT-NTEGRA Prima, Russia). The AFM images were captured under ambient conditions (RH = 45%, T = 25°C) using a R-TESPA probe (Bruker) in semicontact mode with a spring constant of k = 40 N/m at a scanning rate of 0.7 Hz. The images were analyzed in the NOVA 1.1.0.1921 software.


## 2.5.1. Broth Microdilution Method

TheC. gloeosporioides inocula of both strains were grown on PDA plates at 28°C for 5–10 days. Fungal growth from the plates was flooded with sterile saline solution (0.85%) and gently scraped with a sterile slide. Under aseptic conditions, the conidial suspensions were filtered through sterile gauze to remove mycelia. The number of conidia in the filtered material was counted in a Neubauer chamber and adjusted to a final concentration of 1 × 106 conidia/mL by adding potato dextrose broth (PDB, Difco).Thein vitro antifungal activity was determined by calculating the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the synthesized nanomaterials [25] using microdilution methods in culture broth, following the M38-A2 protocol of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute® (CLSI). All NPs were dissolved in DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and diluted in sterile 96-well plates (Nunc F96 microtiter plates) with PDB in a geometric progression from 2 to 2048 times. Thus, the wells contained 100 μL of PDB with different concentrations of NPs in serial 2-fold dilutions (5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, 0.312, 0.156, 0.078, 0.039, 0.019, 0.009, 0.004, and 0.002 mg/mL). After the NPs were diluted, 100 μL suspensions of 1 × 105 conidia/mL were inoculated. Prochloraz was used as the positive control and DMSO as the negative control. The assays were performed in triplicate and were incubated for 48 h at 28°C. The MIC end-point criterion for each fungus was defined as the lowest concentration of fungal growth and was determined visually by optical microscopy.The fungicidal activity was then determined by calculating the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of the NPs with fungicidal or fungistatic action. A fungicidal agent kills cells at concentrations similar to its MIC. Conversely, a fungistatic compound may be unable to kill all fungal cells despite having a strong MIC. After the MIC measurements, the MFCs were established by taking 5μL of each well with no visible fungal growth and inoculating it on a fresh PDA medium. After incubation for 72 h at 28°C, the number of surviving organisms was determined. The MFC was defined as the lowest concentration at which 99.9% of the fungus was killed.


## 2.5.2. Effect of Nanoparticles on Mycelial Radial Growth

The effect of the synthesized nanomaterials on the inhibition of the mycelial growth of the two evaluated strains ofC. gloeosporioides was also determined. The evaluated treatments were as follows: (1) culture medium without treatment (negative control), (2) culture media with two commercial fungicides (positive controls), and (3) culture media with three MICs of NPs (0.625, 0.312, and 0.156 mg/mL) according to the broth microdilution assay.The evaluated NP concentrations were added to culture media that were cooled to 50°C prior to being placed in Petri dishes (90 mm diameter × 15 mm thick). One day later, the center of each dish was inoculated with an agar disk (6 mm diameter) bearing mycelial growth from an 8-day-oldC. gloeosporioides culture. The experiment was carried out in triplicate and incubated at 28°C for nine days. The radial inhibition rate was calculated when the mycelial growth of the control plate reached the edge of the Petri dish using the equation R−r/R×100% [26], where R is the radial growth of the fungal mycelia on the control plate and r is the radial growth of fungal mycelia on plates treated with NPs or commercial fungicides. From these assays, slides were prepared to analyze the structural damage to fungi resulting from the NPs via optical microscopy (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and atomic force microscopy (AFM, NT-MDT-NTEGRA Prima, Russia). The AFM images were captured under ambient conditions (RH = 45%, T = 25°C) using a R-TESPA probe (Bruker) in semicontact mode with a spring constant of k = 40 N/m at a scanning rate of 0.7 Hz. The images were analyzed in the NOVA 1.1.0.1921 software.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization of Metal Oxide Nanomaterials

Figure1 shows a representative XRD patterns for all synthetized nanomaterials described in Table 1. S2, S4, S6, S10, and S12 correspond to MgO by coprecipitation, ZnO by coprecipitation, ZnO by hydrothermal, ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composite by hydrothermal, and ZnO/MgO composite by coprecipitation, respectively. The XRD data indicate the high crystallinity of all samples. The structural phase of MgO was periclase (S1, S2; Table 1). The ZnO synthesized by both the coprecipitation and the hydrothermal methods had the same XRD pattern corresponding to zincite (S3, S4, S5, and S6; Table 1). Their diffraction patterns only differed in terms of the width of peaks, which is related with the size of crystallites (Table 2). The ZnO/MgO composite presented the diffraction peaks of both phases of zincite and periclase (S11, S12, and S13; Table 1). The XRD of ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composite presented the diffraction peaks of zincite and brucite (Mg(OH)2) phases (S7, S8, S9, and S10; Table 1).Figure 1
Representative X-ray diffraction patterns of the synthesized nanoparticles. The samples are in agreement with the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) reference pattern numbers 00-087-0653 (MgO, periclase), 00-036-1451 (ZnO, zincite), and 00-007-0239 (Mg(OH)2, brucite).Table 2
Determination of the crystallite size, the average diameter, and MICs of different nanoparticle samples onColletotrichum gloeosporioides obtained from papaya (PG-16) and avocado (AP-14).
Samples
Crystallite size(nm)
Average diameter(nm)
C. gloeosporioidesMICs (mg/mL)
PG-16
AP-14
S1
13
52 ± 18
0.156
0.312
S2
24
96 ± 33
0.312
0.312
S3
22
51 ± 13
0.156
0.312
S4
26
53 ± 17
0.156
0.312
S5
24
63 ± 18
0.312
0.312
S6
37
77 ± 31
0.312
0.312
S7
ZnO NMMg(OH)2 23
54 ± 17
0.156
0.312
S8
ZnO NMMg(OH)2 30
88 ± 30
0.312
0.312
S9
ZnO NMMg(OH)2 23
71 ± 22
0.312
0.312
S10
ZnO NMMg(OH)2 24
98 ± 41
0.312
0.312
S11
ZnO 49MgO 23
139 ± 49
0.312
0.312
S12
ZnO 49Mg 25
161 ± 44
0.312
0.312
S13
ZnO NMMgO 24
219 ± 39
0.625
0.625
NM: not measured.The SEM images of the synthesized materials S1 and S2 (Figure2) correspond with MgO calcined at 500°C and 1000°C, respectively; these two materials have layers with flake morphology. Samples S3 and S4 correspond with ZnO calcined at 500°C and 1000°C, respectively, via coprecipitation method. Small spheres and some cylinders can be observed in S3, whereas S4 exhibits well-defined hexagonal bars. Meanwhile, in the hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO, some hexagonal bars and ovoid structures are observed in S5; in addition, S6 shows some prisms with pyramidal ends. ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composite (S7–S10), amorphous flakes and some bars are observed. Finally, ZnO/MgO composites (S11, S12, and S13) show aggregates of amorphous flakes. S11 is not presented because it had the same morphology, crystallite, and particle size with the sample S12.Figure 2
Scanning electron microscopy images of the different synthesized metal oxide nanoparticles. Scale bars correspond to 100 nm for all images.


### 3.2. Antifungal Effect of Nanoparticles onColletotrichum gloeosporioides

The crystallite size (Table2) of MgO and ZnO synthesized by coprecipitation method at two temperatures was determined using (1) and increases at higher temperature of calcination. The same behavior was observed for ZnO synthesized by hydrothermal method. In the latter case, the pressure inside the vessel contributed to the growth of the crystallites. In the case of ZnO observed in ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composite material, the crystallite size was not determined by the Scherrer equation (1), because the sizes of the crystallites were much larger than 50 nm [27]. Meanwhile, for Mg(OH)2, the size was nearly the same at all treatment temperatures. Finally, the crystallite size of MgO formed in ZnO/MgO composite obtained by coprecipitation method did not change as the calcination temperature increased, although for ZnO, it increases as the calcination temperature is higher, as mentioned earlier.The average diameter of the particles was also measured (Table2). The average size and size dispersion of ZnO NPs formed by the coprecipitation method were smaller than those formed by the hydrothermal method. According to the Scherrer approximation, the ZnO crystallite particles had an average diameter larger than 70 nm.


#### 3.2.1. Broth Microdilution Method

In all assay, the MICs were equal to the MFCs, indicating that the action of the NPs was fungicidal. The MICs of MgO NPs (S1 and S2) againstC. gloeosporioides from papaya increased as the crystallite size grows, although this effect was not observed for the fungus obtained from avocado. The ZnO NPs synthesized by both coprecipitation and hydrothermal methods had similar crystallite sizes; however, slight differences in the generated particle sizes (i.e., smaller sizes) could be related with the lowest MICs against papaya fungi, which corresponded with samples S3, S4, and S7. In the case of the composite NPs, it is difficult to compare the crystallites because they were larger than 50 nm; therefore, the Scherrer equation was not valid [27]. However, particles within the range of 60–161 nm had the same MIC against both fungal strains (0.312 mg/mL). For particles larger than 200 nm, the values of MIC are twice, as observed in sample S13.With respect to the antifungal activity of the NPs against theC. gloeosporioides strains isolated from papaya (PG-16) and avocado (AP-14), we found that a MIC of 0.312 mg/mL was required to totally inhibit strain AP-14, independently of the type of NP (Table 2). The NPs with the lowest MICs against PG-16 were S1, S3, S4, and S7 (0.156 mg/mL); in these latter samples, the size of NPs fluctuated between 51 and 54 nm. With these results, we infer that the smaller NPs have greater antifungal activity and inhibit the germination of the evaluated fungal strains to a greater extent.


#### 3.2.2. Effect of Nanoparticles on Mycelial Radial Growth

The NPs were assayed in culture media with the evaluated strains ofC. gloeosporioides to test their antifungal activity. The percentages of radial inhibition of the evaluated fungal strains were calculated to understand the antagonistic effects of the NPs on these fungi (Figure 3). Pure ZnO (S3–S6) most actively inhibited both strains of fungi and resulted in percentages of inhibition greater than 80%. Conversely, the MgO NPs as well as the ZnO/MgO and ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composites were the least effective against the fungi, as the presence of Mg had an antagonistic effect on the activity of the ZnO NPs (Figure 4). These results were similar to those reported for the activity of silver NPs against C. gloeosporioides from papaya at lower concentrations [9]. Silver NPs can have a higher antimicrobial activity than zinc but have been shown to be toxic in some cases [28]; in addition, zinc oxide NPs can also be used as nutrients by plants [29].Figure 3
Antifungal activity against two strains ofC. gloeosporioides of three different concentrations of nanoparticles.
(a)
(b)Figure 4
Radial growth inhibition of strains AP-14 and PG-16, by different concentrations of nanoparticles. The synthesis parameters of each image are described in Table1.The radial growth of the fungal strain from papaya (versus avocado) was the least inhibited by the NPs. These results were confirmed by a susceptibility test carried out with commercial antifungal agents (benomyl and prochloraz) in the positive controls of anthracnose strains obtained from avocado and papaya. In both trials, the strain from papaya was more resistant to benomyl than the strain from avocado; the strains from papaya and avocado had MICs of 0.625 and 0.312μg/mL, respectively. Although, 10 μg/mL of benomyl was necessary to reach 80% and 85% growth inhibition of the strains, from papaya and avocado, respectively. The behavior of prochloraz was similar; the MICs for the strains from papaya and avocado were 0.05 and 0.025 μg/mL, respectively. In this case, only 1 μg/mL of prochloraz was necessary to achieve the total inhibition of both fungi.Benomyl and prochloraz are effective fungicides for the inhibition ofColletotrichum strains that cause anthracnose and other symptoms in several tropical fruits; diverse studies have shown that Colletotrichum strains could present resistance to these compounds [30, 31]. In this study, we found that both evaluated fungal strains showed resistance to 1 μg/mL of benomyl.Several studies have also examined the interaction of NPs with bacteria [11, 13, 32, 33], although few have examined the effects of NPs on fungi [9, 12, 34]. This may be due to the simplicity of bacterial systems in comparison to fungal systems. Some studies have demonstrated that smaller ZnO particles have greater activity on different kinds of bacteria [32, 35]. In our study, we observed a similar behavior of ZnO NPs on fungi; nevertheless, not all biological systems exhibit similar behavior under the influence of the same external agent.Notably, Lipovsky and collaborators provided one explanation on the action of ZnO NPs as a fungicide againstCandida albicans [36]. These researchers found a correlation between ZnO NPs and reactive oxygen species (ROS) that induce cell injury. Also, these researchers reported in a previous work that ZnO NPs are capable of producing ROS in water suspensions [32].Finally, in the radial growth test, different concentrations of NPs inhibited sporulation or caused deformation by swelling the spores of both strains ofC. gloeosporioides. In addition, structural deformation and melanization to the hyphae of fungi were observed (Figure 5), as the NPs resulted in the deformation of the hyphae via swelling or vacuolar expansion. Consequently, fungal growth was generally inhibited. Structural damage caused by NPs to other pathogens has been reported by other authors who have found levels of cellular damage similar to those in this study [37–39].Figure 5
Deformation and structural changes were observed by optical (a) and atomic force microscopy (b). In both strains, the controls with normal hyphae without alterations (C-AG-14 and C-PG-16) are shown, while hyphae swallowed (red and white arrows) and melanization (blue arrows) were caused by the S4 and S3 nanoparticles, respectively.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1. Characterization of Metal Oxide Nanomaterials

Figure1 shows a representative XRD patterns for all synthetized nanomaterials described in Table 1. S2, S4, S6, S10, and S12 correspond to MgO by coprecipitation, ZnO by coprecipitation, ZnO by hydrothermal, ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composite by hydrothermal, and ZnO/MgO composite by coprecipitation, respectively. The XRD data indicate the high crystallinity of all samples. The structural phase of MgO was periclase (S1, S2; Table 1). The ZnO synthesized by both the coprecipitation and the hydrothermal methods had the same XRD pattern corresponding to zincite (S3, S4, S5, and S6; Table 1). Their diffraction patterns only differed in terms of the width of peaks, which is related with the size of crystallites (Table 2). The ZnO/MgO composite presented the diffraction peaks of both phases of zincite and periclase (S11, S12, and S13; Table 1). The XRD of ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composite presented the diffraction peaks of zincite and brucite (Mg(OH)2) phases (S7, S8, S9, and S10; Table 1).Figure 1
Representative X-ray diffraction patterns of the synthesized nanoparticles. The samples are in agreement with the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) reference pattern numbers 00-087-0653 (MgO, periclase), 00-036-1451 (ZnO, zincite), and 00-007-0239 (Mg(OH)2, brucite).Table 2
Determination of the crystallite size, the average diameter, and MICs of different nanoparticle samples onColletotrichum gloeosporioides obtained from papaya (PG-16) and avocado (AP-14).
Samples
Crystallite size(nm)
Average diameter(nm)
C. gloeosporioidesMICs (mg/mL)
PG-16
AP-14
S1
13
52 ± 18
0.156
0.312
S2
24
96 ± 33
0.312
0.312
S3
22
51 ± 13
0.156
0.312
S4
26
53 ± 17
0.156
0.312
S5
24
63 ± 18
0.312
0.312
S6
37
77 ± 31
0.312
0.312
S7
ZnO NMMg(OH)2 23
54 ± 17
0.156
0.312
S8
ZnO NMMg(OH)2 30
88 ± 30
0.312
0.312
S9
ZnO NMMg(OH)2 23
71 ± 22
0.312
0.312
S10
ZnO NMMg(OH)2 24
98 ± 41
0.312
0.312
S11
ZnO 49MgO 23
139 ± 49
0.312
0.312
S12
ZnO 49Mg 25
161 ± 44
0.312
0.312
S13
ZnO NMMgO 24
219 ± 39
0.625
0.625
NM: not measured.The SEM images of the synthesized materials S1 and S2 (Figure2) correspond with MgO calcined at 500°C and 1000°C, respectively; these two materials have layers with flake morphology. Samples S3 and S4 correspond with ZnO calcined at 500°C and 1000°C, respectively, via coprecipitation method. Small spheres and some cylinders can be observed in S3, whereas S4 exhibits well-defined hexagonal bars. Meanwhile, in the hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO, some hexagonal bars and ovoid structures are observed in S5; in addition, S6 shows some prisms with pyramidal ends. ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composite (S7–S10), amorphous flakes and some bars are observed. Finally, ZnO/MgO composites (S11, S12, and S13) show aggregates of amorphous flakes. S11 is not presented because it had the same morphology, crystallite, and particle size with the sample S12.Figure 2
Scanning electron microscopy images of the different synthesized metal oxide nanoparticles. Scale bars correspond to 100 nm for all images.


## 3.2. Antifungal Effect of Nanoparticles onColletotrichum gloeosporioides

The crystallite size (Table2) of MgO and ZnO synthesized by coprecipitation method at two temperatures was determined using (1) and increases at higher temperature of calcination. The same behavior was observed for ZnO synthesized by hydrothermal method. In the latter case, the pressure inside the vessel contributed to the growth of the crystallites. In the case of ZnO observed in ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composite material, the crystallite size was not determined by the Scherrer equation (1), because the sizes of the crystallites were much larger than 50 nm [27]. Meanwhile, for Mg(OH)2, the size was nearly the same at all treatment temperatures. Finally, the crystallite size of MgO formed in ZnO/MgO composite obtained by coprecipitation method did not change as the calcination temperature increased, although for ZnO, it increases as the calcination temperature is higher, as mentioned earlier.The average diameter of the particles was also measured (Table2). The average size and size dispersion of ZnO NPs formed by the coprecipitation method were smaller than those formed by the hydrothermal method. According to the Scherrer approximation, the ZnO crystallite particles had an average diameter larger than 70 nm.


### 3.2.1. Broth Microdilution Method

In all assay, the MICs were equal to the MFCs, indicating that the action of the NPs was fungicidal. The MICs of MgO NPs (S1 and S2) againstC. gloeosporioides from papaya increased as the crystallite size grows, although this effect was not observed for the fungus obtained from avocado. The ZnO NPs synthesized by both coprecipitation and hydrothermal methods had similar crystallite sizes; however, slight differences in the generated particle sizes (i.e., smaller sizes) could be related with the lowest MICs against papaya fungi, which corresponded with samples S3, S4, and S7. In the case of the composite NPs, it is difficult to compare the crystallites because they were larger than 50 nm; therefore, the Scherrer equation was not valid [27]. However, particles within the range of 60–161 nm had the same MIC against both fungal strains (0.312 mg/mL). For particles larger than 200 nm, the values of MIC are twice, as observed in sample S13.With respect to the antifungal activity of the NPs against theC. gloeosporioides strains isolated from papaya (PG-16) and avocado (AP-14), we found that a MIC of 0.312 mg/mL was required to totally inhibit strain AP-14, independently of the type of NP (Table 2). The NPs with the lowest MICs against PG-16 were S1, S3, S4, and S7 (0.156 mg/mL); in these latter samples, the size of NPs fluctuated between 51 and 54 nm. With these results, we infer that the smaller NPs have greater antifungal activity and inhibit the germination of the evaluated fungal strains to a greater extent.


### 3.2.2. Effect of Nanoparticles on Mycelial Radial Growth

The NPs were assayed in culture media with the evaluated strains ofC. gloeosporioides to test their antifungal activity. The percentages of radial inhibition of the evaluated fungal strains were calculated to understand the antagonistic effects of the NPs on these fungi (Figure 3). Pure ZnO (S3–S6) most actively inhibited both strains of fungi and resulted in percentages of inhibition greater than 80%. Conversely, the MgO NPs as well as the ZnO/MgO and ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composites were the least effective against the fungi, as the presence of Mg had an antagonistic effect on the activity of the ZnO NPs (Figure 4). These results were similar to those reported for the activity of silver NPs against C. gloeosporioides from papaya at lower concentrations [9]. Silver NPs can have a higher antimicrobial activity than zinc but have been shown to be toxic in some cases [28]; in addition, zinc oxide NPs can also be used as nutrients by plants [29].Figure 3
Antifungal activity against two strains ofC. gloeosporioides of three different concentrations of nanoparticles.
(a)
(b)Figure 4
Radial growth inhibition of strains AP-14 and PG-16, by different concentrations of nanoparticles. The synthesis parameters of each image are described in Table1.The radial growth of the fungal strain from papaya (versus avocado) was the least inhibited by the NPs. These results were confirmed by a susceptibility test carried out with commercial antifungal agents (benomyl and prochloraz) in the positive controls of anthracnose strains obtained from avocado and papaya. In both trials, the strain from papaya was more resistant to benomyl than the strain from avocado; the strains from papaya and avocado had MICs of 0.625 and 0.312μg/mL, respectively. Although, 10 μg/mL of benomyl was necessary to reach 80% and 85% growth inhibition of the strains, from papaya and avocado, respectively. The behavior of prochloraz was similar; the MICs for the strains from papaya and avocado were 0.05 and 0.025 μg/mL, respectively. In this case, only 1 μg/mL of prochloraz was necessary to achieve the total inhibition of both fungi.Benomyl and prochloraz are effective fungicides for the inhibition ofColletotrichum strains that cause anthracnose and other symptoms in several tropical fruits; diverse studies have shown that Colletotrichum strains could present resistance to these compounds [30, 31]. In this study, we found that both evaluated fungal strains showed resistance to 1 μg/mL of benomyl.Several studies have also examined the interaction of NPs with bacteria [11, 13, 32, 33], although few have examined the effects of NPs on fungi [9, 12, 34]. This may be due to the simplicity of bacterial systems in comparison to fungal systems. Some studies have demonstrated that smaller ZnO particles have greater activity on different kinds of bacteria [32, 35]. In our study, we observed a similar behavior of ZnO NPs on fungi; nevertheless, not all biological systems exhibit similar behavior under the influence of the same external agent.Notably, Lipovsky and collaborators provided one explanation on the action of ZnO NPs as a fungicide againstCandida albicans [36]. These researchers found a correlation between ZnO NPs and reactive oxygen species (ROS) that induce cell injury. Also, these researchers reported in a previous work that ZnO NPs are capable of producing ROS in water suspensions [32].Finally, in the radial growth test, different concentrations of NPs inhibited sporulation or caused deformation by swelling the spores of both strains ofC. gloeosporioides. In addition, structural deformation and melanization to the hyphae of fungi were observed (Figure 5), as the NPs resulted in the deformation of the hyphae via swelling or vacuolar expansion. Consequently, fungal growth was generally inhibited. Structural damage caused by NPs to other pathogens has been reported by other authors who have found levels of cellular damage similar to those in this study [37–39].Figure 5
Deformation and structural changes were observed by optical (a) and atomic force microscopy (b). In both strains, the controls with normal hyphae without alterations (C-AG-14 and C-PG-16) are shown, while hyphae swallowed (red and white arrows) and melanization (blue arrows) were caused by the S4 and S3 nanoparticles, respectively.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2.1. Broth Microdilution Method

In all assay, the MICs were equal to the MFCs, indicating that the action of the NPs was fungicidal. The MICs of MgO NPs (S1 and S2) againstC. gloeosporioides from papaya increased as the crystallite size grows, although this effect was not observed for the fungus obtained from avocado. The ZnO NPs synthesized by both coprecipitation and hydrothermal methods had similar crystallite sizes; however, slight differences in the generated particle sizes (i.e., smaller sizes) could be related with the lowest MICs against papaya fungi, which corresponded with samples S3, S4, and S7. In the case of the composite NPs, it is difficult to compare the crystallites because they were larger than 50 nm; therefore, the Scherrer equation was not valid [27]. However, particles within the range of 60–161 nm had the same MIC against both fungal strains (0.312 mg/mL). For particles larger than 200 nm, the values of MIC are twice, as observed in sample S13.With respect to the antifungal activity of the NPs against theC. gloeosporioides strains isolated from papaya (PG-16) and avocado (AP-14), we found that a MIC of 0.312 mg/mL was required to totally inhibit strain AP-14, independently of the type of NP (Table 2). The NPs with the lowest MICs against PG-16 were S1, S3, S4, and S7 (0.156 mg/mL); in these latter samples, the size of NPs fluctuated between 51 and 54 nm. With these results, we infer that the smaller NPs have greater antifungal activity and inhibit the germination of the evaluated fungal strains to a greater extent.


## 3.2.2. Effect of Nanoparticles on Mycelial Radial Growth

The NPs were assayed in culture media with the evaluated strains ofC. gloeosporioides to test their antifungal activity. The percentages of radial inhibition of the evaluated fungal strains were calculated to understand the antagonistic effects of the NPs on these fungi (Figure 3). Pure ZnO (S3–S6) most actively inhibited both strains of fungi and resulted in percentages of inhibition greater than 80%. Conversely, the MgO NPs as well as the ZnO/MgO and ZnO/Mg(OH)2 composites were the least effective against the fungi, as the presence of Mg had an antagonistic effect on the activity of the ZnO NPs (Figure 4). These results were similar to those reported for the activity of silver NPs against C. gloeosporioides from papaya at lower concentrations [9]. Silver NPs can have a higher antimicrobial activity than zinc but have been shown to be toxic in some cases [28]; in addition, zinc oxide NPs can also be used as nutrients by plants [29].Figure 3
Antifungal activity against two strains ofC. gloeosporioides of three different concentrations of nanoparticles.
(a)
(b)Figure 4
Radial growth inhibition of strains AP-14 and PG-16, by different concentrations of nanoparticles. The synthesis parameters of each image are described in Table1.The radial growth of the fungal strain from papaya (versus avocado) was the least inhibited by the NPs. These results were confirmed by a susceptibility test carried out with commercial antifungal agents (benomyl and prochloraz) in the positive controls of anthracnose strains obtained from avocado and papaya. In both trials, the strain from papaya was more resistant to benomyl than the strain from avocado; the strains from papaya and avocado had MICs of 0.625 and 0.312μg/mL, respectively. Although, 10 μg/mL of benomyl was necessary to reach 80% and 85% growth inhibition of the strains, from papaya and avocado, respectively. The behavior of prochloraz was similar; the MICs for the strains from papaya and avocado were 0.05 and 0.025 μg/mL, respectively. In this case, only 1 μg/mL of prochloraz was necessary to achieve the total inhibition of both fungi.Benomyl and prochloraz are effective fungicides for the inhibition ofColletotrichum strains that cause anthracnose and other symptoms in several tropical fruits; diverse studies have shown that Colletotrichum strains could present resistance to these compounds [30, 31]. In this study, we found that both evaluated fungal strains showed resistance to 1 μg/mL of benomyl.Several studies have also examined the interaction of NPs with bacteria [11, 13, 32, 33], although few have examined the effects of NPs on fungi [9, 12, 34]. This may be due to the simplicity of bacterial systems in comparison to fungal systems. Some studies have demonstrated that smaller ZnO particles have greater activity on different kinds of bacteria [32, 35]. In our study, we observed a similar behavior of ZnO NPs on fungi; nevertheless, not all biological systems exhibit similar behavior under the influence of the same external agent.Notably, Lipovsky and collaborators provided one explanation on the action of ZnO NPs as a fungicide againstCandida albicans [36]. These researchers found a correlation between ZnO NPs and reactive oxygen species (ROS) that induce cell injury. Also, these researchers reported in a previous work that ZnO NPs are capable of producing ROS in water suspensions [32].Finally, in the radial growth test, different concentrations of NPs inhibited sporulation or caused deformation by swelling the spores of both strains ofC. gloeosporioides. In addition, structural deformation and melanization to the hyphae of fungi were observed (Figure 5), as the NPs resulted in the deformation of the hyphae via swelling or vacuolar expansion. Consequently, fungal growth was generally inhibited. Structural damage caused by NPs to other pathogens has been reported by other authors who have found levels of cellular damage similar to those in this study [37–39].Figure 5
Deformation and structural changes were observed by optical (a) and atomic force microscopy (b). In both strains, the controls with normal hyphae without alterations (C-AG-14 and C-PG-16) are shown, while hyphae swallowed (red and white arrows) and melanization (blue arrows) were caused by the S4 and S3 nanoparticles, respectively.
(a)
(b)


## 4. Conclusions

Of the synthesized NPs, ZnO obtained by both methods of synthesis (hydrothermal and coprecipitation) demonstrated greater antifungal activity against the two analyzed strains ofC. gloeosporioides that cause anthracnose in avocado and papaya. The microdilution technique was used to confirm that NP concentrations between 0.156 and 0.625 mg/mL inhibited the spore germination of C. gloeosporioides according to the measurement of radial growth and also caused hyphal deformation. In all experiments, the MICs were equal to the MFCs, indicating that the action of the NPs was fungicidal.However, regardless of the mechanism of action, ZnO NPs can be effective fungicides againstC. gloeosporioides strains obtained from papaya and avocado. In addition, ZnO NPs may offer additional benefits to plants. The fungal strain from papaya exhibited greater resistance to the evaluated NPs; in contrast, the strain from avocado was more susceptible to the action of the NPs.Traditional fungicidal treatments to controlC. gloeosporioides are expensive, and C. gloeosporioides presents resistance to some treatments. In this context, NPs represent one alternative for controlling anthracnose caused by C. gloeosporioides and can also provide additional nutrients to plants.



---

*Source: 3498527-2018-08-19.xml*