# Virulence Genes amongEnterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Isolated from Coastal Beaches and Human and Nonhuman Sources in Southern California and Puerto Rico

Authors: Donna M. Ferguson; Ginamary Negrón Talavera; Luis A. Ríos Hernández; Stephen B. Weisberg; Richard F. Ambrose; Jennifer A. Jay
Journal: Journal of Pathogens
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

MostEnterococcus faecalis andE. faecium are harmless to humans; however, strains harboring virulence genes, includingesp, gelE, cylA, asa1, andhyl, have been associated with human infections.E. faecalis andE. faecium are present in beach waters worldwide, yet little is known about their virulence potential. Here, multiplex PCR was used to compare the distribution of virulence genes amongE. faecalis andE. faecium isolated from beaches in Southern California and Puerto Rico to isolates from potential sources including humans, animals, birds, and plants. All five virulence genes were found inE. faecalis andE. faecium from beach water, mostly amongE. faecalis.gelE was the most common among isolates from all source types. There was a lower incidence ofasa1,esp,cylA, andhyl genes among isolates from beach water, sewage, septage, urban runoff, sea wrack, and eelgrass as compared to human isolates, indicating that virulent strains ofE. faecalis andE. faecium may not be widely disseminated at beaches. A higher frequency ofasa1 andesp amongE. faecalis from dogs and ofasa1 among birds (mostly seagull) suggests that further studies on the distribution and virulence potential of strains carrying these genes may be warranted.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Enterococcus faecalis andEnterococcus faecium are commonly found in the intestinal tracts of humans and animals and also ubiquitous in the environment [1]. While generally considered to be harmless, certain strains ofE. faecalis andE. faecium are among the leading causes of nosocomial infections including urinary tract infections, abdominal and wound infections, endocarditis, and bacteremia [2–5].E. faecalis andE. faecium isolated from patients in hospital settings have been shown to harbor a higher frequency ofgelE (gelatinase),asa1 (aggregation substance),esp (enterococcal surface protein),cylA (cytolysin activator), andhyl (glycoside-hydrolase) as compared to strains found in nonhospitalized individuals, animals, and food [6–12]. Commensal, that is, harmless,E. faecalis andE. faecium can become opportunistic pathogens by acquiring antibiotic resistant and putative virulent genes from other bacteria via horizontal gene transfer [2, 4, 13–17].E. faecalis andE. faecium are among the most common species of enterococci found in the beach environment [18–21]. Enterococci found in the beach environment can include naturalized populations existing in soil and vegetation as well as strains from humans, sewage, animals, birds, reptiles, and insects [1]. Presumably, potentially pathogenicE. faecalis andE. faecium in human fecal waste would harbor higher numbers of virulence genes as compared to strains from animal and environmental sources.In Puerto Rico, beaches receive storm flows containing contaminated septage and agricultural runoff potentially carrying enterococci derived from human and animal fecal waste. In Southern California, urban runoff, beach sand, and sea wrack (macroalgae on beach sand) have been identified as important sources of enterococci to beach water [22–25].Previous studies showed thatE. faecalis andE. faecium from the beach water and sand harbor antibiotic resistant genes suggesting a potential health risk for beach goers [26–30]; however, the frequency of other virulence factors was not determined. Here, we compared the frequency of putative enterococcal virulence genes (esp,gelE,cylA,asa1, andhyl) amongE. faecalis andE. faecium from beaches in Southern California and Puerto Rico impacted by different enterococci source inputs to assess beaches as an environmental reservoir of potentially virulent enterococci.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Sources ofE. faecalis andE. faecium Isolates

#### 2.1.1. Southern California

A total of 170Enterococcus (91E. faecalis and 79E. faecium) isolates were screened for putative enterococcal virulence genes (Table 1). The environmental isolates were randomly selected from a collection of strains obtained from previous studies [20, 31] including beach water, eelgrass (Zostera marina), wrack (mainlyMacrocystis pyrifera), sand, creek, or storm drain runoff upstream of beaches and sewage influent (untreated waste) and effluent. Isolates from animals were obtained from bird (mostly seagull) stools on beach and dog stools. Human (nonclinical) strains ofE. faecalis andE. faecium were isolated from urine and fecal samples from 18 healthy (nonhospitalized) individuals residing in Southern California. Human fecal and urine specimens obtained from healthy individuals were considered representative of strains that could be found in beach water due to human shedding or contamination from sewage and/or septage. TenE. faecium isolates identified as vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE), 5 clinical strains ofE. faecium (non-VRE), and 10E. faecalis isolated from rectal swabs (3), urine (1), blood (1), abscess (1), ascites (2), vagina (1), and joint (1) were provided by Orange County Public Health Laboratory (OCPHL). Clinical isolates were included for comparison to strains with enhanced virulence potential.Table 1
Sources ofE. faecalis and E. faecium isolated from Southern California.
Source
Number of samples
Number of sites
Number of isolates
Total number of isolates
E. faecalis
E. faecium
Environmental
Beach water
5
5
8
10
18
Urban runoff
10
5
20
8
28
Sand
5
5
0
5
5
Sea wrack
5
1
5
5
10
Eelgrass
7
1
5
3
8
Wastewater influent
4
4
6
3
9
Wastewater effluent
5
2
6
11
17
Human
Human, healthy
18
NA
15
8
23
Human, clinical
10
Unk
10
5
15
Vancomycin resistant enterococci
Unk
Unk
0
10
10
Animal
Dogs
7
7
7
3
10
Birds
16
2
9
8
17
Total
92
91
79
170
NA = not applicable.
Unk = unknown.


#### 2.1.2. Puerto Rico

A total of 247Enterococcus (174E. faecalis and 73E. faecium) isolates from Puerto Rico were analyzed (Table 2). Enterococcal isolates from beach water were obtained from two beaches in Puerto Rico. Human (nonclinical) enterococcal strains were isolated from fresh fecal samples from nine healthy individuals from Mayaguez, Puerto Rico. Clinical enterococcal strains were isolated from urine specimens and identified to species level by a local hospital in Mayaguez. Six septage samples were obtained from individual houses or from septic tank trucks after emptying individual family tanks.Table 2
Sources ofE. faecalis and E. faecium isolated from Puerto Rico.
Source
Number of samples
Number of sites
Number of isolates
Total number of isolates
E. faecalis
E. faecium
Environmental
Beach water
9
2
108
32
140
Septage
6
6
19
26
45
Human
Human, healthy
9
1
5
4
9
Human, clinical
53
1
42
11
53
Total
77
174
73
247


### 2.2. Isolation and Identification of Enterococci

#### 2.2.1. Southern California

Enterococcal isolates from all samples (except for clinical specimens) were obtained using mEI agar and identified to species level using the Vitek II (bioMérieux) plus additional biochemical tests and pigment and motility as per Ferguson et al. [32]. Clinical strains were isolated by OCPHL using TSA with 5% sheep’s blood; presumptive enterococcal colonies were gram-stained and identified using MicroScan (Siemens Healthcare) and/or API Strep 20 (bioMérieux). Up to 3 isolates per sample identified asE. faecalis andE. faecium were randomly selected for virulence gene analysis. Species identification of 8 different isolates obtained using biochemical methods was also confirmed by 16S rRNA sequencing conducted at GenoSeq, University of California, Los Angeles.


#### 2.2.2. Puerto Rico

Enterococcal isolates from all samples (except for clinical specimens) were obtained using mE agar. All isolates were divided into four groups based on pigmentation and motility. The isolates were identified to the genus level based on growth in BHI with 6.5% NaCl, growth at 45°C, esculin hydrolysis, catalase, and PCR amplifying of the Tuf gene [33]. Species level identification was done by a double digestion of the PCR product of the ATP synthase α subunit gene in combination with a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay (paper in preparation). Clinical strains obtained from a local hospital were identified using MicroScan system (Siemens Health Care). Up to 12 isolates each ofE. faecalis orE. faecium were randomly selected per sample for virulence gene analysis.


### 2.3. DNA Extraction

#### 2.3.1. Southern California and Puerto Rico

E. faecalis andE. faecium strains were grown in BHI broth, incubated overnight at 37°C, and harvested by centrifugation (13,000 RPM for 5 min). The cells were washed three times in TE buffer and resuspended in 200 μL 1x TE (10 mM Tris-HCl; 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and lysed by heating at 95°C for 10 min. The lysed cells were transferred to tubes with glass beads, subjected to bead beating for five minutes, and centrifuged as before.


### 2.4. Multiplex PCR for the Detection of Enterococcal Virulence Genes

Total DNA extracted from all isolates obtained from California and Puerto Rico was screened for enterococcal virulence genes (gelE,asa1,esp,cylA, andhyl) using PCR primers and multiplex method developed by Vankerckhoven et al. [34] with the following modifications: we used Promega Flexi Taq DNA polymerase instead of Hot-StarTaq DNA polymerase in the master mix; the initial activation step was done at 95°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (95°C for 30 sec), annealing (49.5°C for 30 sec), and extension (72°C for 2 min) and 1 cycle of elongation at 72°C for 10 min. Each set of primers has a characteristic product size to differentiate within the five virulence genes (asa1 at 375 bp,gelE at 213 bp,cylA at 688 bp,esp at 510 bp, andhyl at 276 bp). PCR products obtained by the Puerto Rico laboratory were confirmed by 1.8% agarose-gel electrophoresis (90 v, 2.5 hrs), stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized by UV transillumination (VersaDoc MP 4000). In Southern California, PCR products were visualized using the FlashGel® (Lonza) system. 2 μL of extracted DNA was diluted in 2 μL FlashGel loading dye and inserted into 12 + 1-cassette wells. A 50 bp–1.5 kb DNA ladder (Lonza) was used as a molecular size marker. FlashGels were run at 150 V for up to 13 minutes. Each PCR run included a no-template control; the positive control strain used forgelE,esp,asa1, andcylA wasE. faecalis MMH594 kindly donated by N. Shankar, Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmaceutics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City [14].


## 2.1. Sources ofE. faecalis andE. faecium Isolates

### 2.1.1. Southern California

A total of 170Enterococcus (91E. faecalis and 79E. faecium) isolates were screened for putative enterococcal virulence genes (Table 1). The environmental isolates were randomly selected from a collection of strains obtained from previous studies [20, 31] including beach water, eelgrass (Zostera marina), wrack (mainlyMacrocystis pyrifera), sand, creek, or storm drain runoff upstream of beaches and sewage influent (untreated waste) and effluent. Isolates from animals were obtained from bird (mostly seagull) stools on beach and dog stools. Human (nonclinical) strains ofE. faecalis andE. faecium were isolated from urine and fecal samples from 18 healthy (nonhospitalized) individuals residing in Southern California. Human fecal and urine specimens obtained from healthy individuals were considered representative of strains that could be found in beach water due to human shedding or contamination from sewage and/or septage. TenE. faecium isolates identified as vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE), 5 clinical strains ofE. faecium (non-VRE), and 10E. faecalis isolated from rectal swabs (3), urine (1), blood (1), abscess (1), ascites (2), vagina (1), and joint (1) were provided by Orange County Public Health Laboratory (OCPHL). Clinical isolates were included for comparison to strains with enhanced virulence potential.Table 1
Sources ofE. faecalis and E. faecium isolated from Southern California.
Source
Number of samples
Number of sites
Number of isolates
Total number of isolates
E. faecalis
E. faecium
Environmental
Beach water
5
5
8
10
18
Urban runoff
10
5
20
8
28
Sand
5
5
0
5
5
Sea wrack
5
1
5
5
10
Eelgrass
7
1
5
3
8
Wastewater influent
4
4
6
3
9
Wastewater effluent
5
2
6
11
17
Human
Human, healthy
18
NA
15
8
23
Human, clinical
10
Unk
10
5
15
Vancomycin resistant enterococci
Unk
Unk
0
10
10
Animal
Dogs
7
7
7
3
10
Birds
16
2
9
8
17
Total
92
91
79
170
NA = not applicable.
Unk = unknown.


### 2.1.2. Puerto Rico

A total of 247Enterococcus (174E. faecalis and 73E. faecium) isolates from Puerto Rico were analyzed (Table 2). Enterococcal isolates from beach water were obtained from two beaches in Puerto Rico. Human (nonclinical) enterococcal strains were isolated from fresh fecal samples from nine healthy individuals from Mayaguez, Puerto Rico. Clinical enterococcal strains were isolated from urine specimens and identified to species level by a local hospital in Mayaguez. Six septage samples were obtained from individual houses or from septic tank trucks after emptying individual family tanks.Table 2
Sources ofE. faecalis and E. faecium isolated from Puerto Rico.
Source
Number of samples
Number of sites
Number of isolates
Total number of isolates
E. faecalis
E. faecium
Environmental
Beach water
9
2
108
32
140
Septage
6
6
19
26
45
Human
Human, healthy
9
1
5
4
9
Human, clinical
53
1
42
11
53
Total
77
174
73
247


## 2.1.1. Southern California

A total of 170Enterococcus (91E. faecalis and 79E. faecium) isolates were screened for putative enterococcal virulence genes (Table 1). The environmental isolates were randomly selected from a collection of strains obtained from previous studies [20, 31] including beach water, eelgrass (Zostera marina), wrack (mainlyMacrocystis pyrifera), sand, creek, or storm drain runoff upstream of beaches and sewage influent (untreated waste) and effluent. Isolates from animals were obtained from bird (mostly seagull) stools on beach and dog stools. Human (nonclinical) strains ofE. faecalis andE. faecium were isolated from urine and fecal samples from 18 healthy (nonhospitalized) individuals residing in Southern California. Human fecal and urine specimens obtained from healthy individuals were considered representative of strains that could be found in beach water due to human shedding or contamination from sewage and/or septage. TenE. faecium isolates identified as vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE), 5 clinical strains ofE. faecium (non-VRE), and 10E. faecalis isolated from rectal swabs (3), urine (1), blood (1), abscess (1), ascites (2), vagina (1), and joint (1) were provided by Orange County Public Health Laboratory (OCPHL). Clinical isolates were included for comparison to strains with enhanced virulence potential.Table 1
Sources ofE. faecalis and E. faecium isolated from Southern California.
Source
Number of samples
Number of sites
Number of isolates
Total number of isolates
E. faecalis
E. faecium
Environmental
Beach water
5
5
8
10
18
Urban runoff
10
5
20
8
28
Sand
5
5
0
5
5
Sea wrack
5
1
5
5
10
Eelgrass
7
1
5
3
8
Wastewater influent
4
4
6
3
9
Wastewater effluent
5
2
6
11
17
Human
Human, healthy
18
NA
15
8
23
Human, clinical
10
Unk
10
5
15
Vancomycin resistant enterococci
Unk
Unk
0
10
10
Animal
Dogs
7
7
7
3
10
Birds
16
2
9
8
17
Total
92
91
79
170
NA = not applicable.
Unk = unknown.


## 2.1.2. Puerto Rico

A total of 247Enterococcus (174E. faecalis and 73E. faecium) isolates from Puerto Rico were analyzed (Table 2). Enterococcal isolates from beach water were obtained from two beaches in Puerto Rico. Human (nonclinical) enterococcal strains were isolated from fresh fecal samples from nine healthy individuals from Mayaguez, Puerto Rico. Clinical enterococcal strains were isolated from urine specimens and identified to species level by a local hospital in Mayaguez. Six septage samples were obtained from individual houses or from septic tank trucks after emptying individual family tanks.Table 2
Sources ofE. faecalis and E. faecium isolated from Puerto Rico.
Source
Number of samples
Number of sites
Number of isolates
Total number of isolates
E. faecalis
E. faecium
Environmental
Beach water
9
2
108
32
140
Septage
6
6
19
26
45
Human
Human, healthy
9
1
5
4
9
Human, clinical
53
1
42
11
53
Total
77
174
73
247


## 2.2. Isolation and Identification of Enterococci

### 2.2.1. Southern California

Enterococcal isolates from all samples (except for clinical specimens) were obtained using mEI agar and identified to species level using the Vitek II (bioMérieux) plus additional biochemical tests and pigment and motility as per Ferguson et al. [32]. Clinical strains were isolated by OCPHL using TSA with 5% sheep’s blood; presumptive enterococcal colonies were gram-stained and identified using MicroScan (Siemens Healthcare) and/or API Strep 20 (bioMérieux). Up to 3 isolates per sample identified asE. faecalis andE. faecium were randomly selected for virulence gene analysis. Species identification of 8 different isolates obtained using biochemical methods was also confirmed by 16S rRNA sequencing conducted at GenoSeq, University of California, Los Angeles.


### 2.2.2. Puerto Rico

Enterococcal isolates from all samples (except for clinical specimens) were obtained using mE agar. All isolates were divided into four groups based on pigmentation and motility. The isolates were identified to the genus level based on growth in BHI with 6.5% NaCl, growth at 45°C, esculin hydrolysis, catalase, and PCR amplifying of the Tuf gene [33]. Species level identification was done by a double digestion of the PCR product of the ATP synthase α subunit gene in combination with a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay (paper in preparation). Clinical strains obtained from a local hospital were identified using MicroScan system (Siemens Health Care). Up to 12 isolates each ofE. faecalis orE. faecium were randomly selected per sample for virulence gene analysis.


## 2.2.1. Southern California

Enterococcal isolates from all samples (except for clinical specimens) were obtained using mEI agar and identified to species level using the Vitek II (bioMérieux) plus additional biochemical tests and pigment and motility as per Ferguson et al. [32]. Clinical strains were isolated by OCPHL using TSA with 5% sheep’s blood; presumptive enterococcal colonies were gram-stained and identified using MicroScan (Siemens Healthcare) and/or API Strep 20 (bioMérieux). Up to 3 isolates per sample identified asE. faecalis andE. faecium were randomly selected for virulence gene analysis. Species identification of 8 different isolates obtained using biochemical methods was also confirmed by 16S rRNA sequencing conducted at GenoSeq, University of California, Los Angeles.


## 2.2.2. Puerto Rico

Enterococcal isolates from all samples (except for clinical specimens) were obtained using mE agar. All isolates were divided into four groups based on pigmentation and motility. The isolates were identified to the genus level based on growth in BHI with 6.5% NaCl, growth at 45°C, esculin hydrolysis, catalase, and PCR amplifying of the Tuf gene [33]. Species level identification was done by a double digestion of the PCR product of the ATP synthase α subunit gene in combination with a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay (paper in preparation). Clinical strains obtained from a local hospital were identified using MicroScan system (Siemens Health Care). Up to 12 isolates each ofE. faecalis orE. faecium were randomly selected per sample for virulence gene analysis.


## 2.3. DNA Extraction

### 2.3.1. Southern California and Puerto Rico

E. faecalis andE. faecium strains were grown in BHI broth, incubated overnight at 37°C, and harvested by centrifugation (13,000 RPM for 5 min). The cells were washed three times in TE buffer and resuspended in 200 μL 1x TE (10 mM Tris-HCl; 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and lysed by heating at 95°C for 10 min. The lysed cells were transferred to tubes with glass beads, subjected to bead beating for five minutes, and centrifuged as before.


## 2.3.1. Southern California and Puerto Rico

E. faecalis andE. faecium strains were grown in BHI broth, incubated overnight at 37°C, and harvested by centrifugation (13,000 RPM for 5 min). The cells were washed three times in TE buffer and resuspended in 200 μL 1x TE (10 mM Tris-HCl; 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and lysed by heating at 95°C for 10 min. The lysed cells were transferred to tubes with glass beads, subjected to bead beating for five minutes, and centrifuged as before.


## 2.4. Multiplex PCR for the Detection of Enterococcal Virulence Genes

Total DNA extracted from all isolates obtained from California and Puerto Rico was screened for enterococcal virulence genes (gelE,asa1,esp,cylA, andhyl) using PCR primers and multiplex method developed by Vankerckhoven et al. [34] with the following modifications: we used Promega Flexi Taq DNA polymerase instead of Hot-StarTaq DNA polymerase in the master mix; the initial activation step was done at 95°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (95°C for 30 sec), annealing (49.5°C for 30 sec), and extension (72°C for 2 min) and 1 cycle of elongation at 72°C for 10 min. Each set of primers has a characteristic product size to differentiate within the five virulence genes (asa1 at 375 bp,gelE at 213 bp,cylA at 688 bp,esp at 510 bp, andhyl at 276 bp). PCR products obtained by the Puerto Rico laboratory were confirmed by 1.8% agarose-gel electrophoresis (90 v, 2.5 hrs), stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized by UV transillumination (VersaDoc MP 4000). In Southern California, PCR products were visualized using the FlashGel® (Lonza) system. 2 μL of extracted DNA was diluted in 2 μL FlashGel loading dye and inserted into 12 + 1-cassette wells. A 50 bp–1.5 kb DNA ladder (Lonza) was used as a molecular size marker. FlashGels were run at 150 V for up to 13 minutes. Each PCR run included a no-template control; the positive control strain used forgelE,esp,asa1, andcylA wasE. faecalis MMH594 kindly donated by N. Shankar, Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmaceutics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City [14].


## 3. Results

A total of 170E. faecalis andE. faecium isolates from Southern California (SC) and 247 isolates from Puerto Rico (PR) from beach water and potential sources of enterococci to beaches were analyzed for enterococcal virulence genesgelE,asa1,esp,cylA, andhyl.Eighty-seven (80.6%)E. faecalis isolates from PR beach water harbored one or more of the following genes:gelE (98.1%),asa1 (44.4%),esp (11.1%), andcylA (3.3%) (Table 3). Five (26.3%)E. faecalis isolates from septage containedgelE (21.0%),asa1 (5.3%),cylA (5.3%), andhyl (5.3%). Eighteen (91.7%)E. faecalis isolates from human specimens (clinical and nonclinical) containedgelE (17.4–100%),asa1 (50–100%),esp (33.3–40%), andcylA (19–60%).Table 3
Distribution of virulence factor genes amongE. faecalis isolates from Southern California (SC) and Puerto Rico (PR).
Source (number) of isolates
% (number) of isolates for the following virulence factor genes:
gelE
asa1
esp
cylA
hyl
None
PR beach water (108)
98.1%
(106)
44.4%
(48)
11.1%
(12)
3.3%
(3)
0.0%
(0)
19.4%
(21)
SC beach water (8)
100.0%
(8)
12.5%
(1)
0.0%
(0)
12.5%
(1)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
SC wrack (5)
100.0%
(5)
20.0%
(1)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
SC eelgrass (5)
80.0%
(4)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
20.0%
(1)
SC urban runoff (20)
70.0%
(14)
10.0%
(2)
5.0%
(1)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
30.0%
(6)
SC sewage influent (6)
50.0%
(3)
50.0%
(3)
16.7%
(1)
16.7%
(1)
0.0%
(0)
33.3%
(2)
SC sewage effluent (6)
83.3%
(5)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
16.7%
(1)
PR septage (19)
21.0%
(4)
5.3%
(1)
0.0%
(0)
5.3%
(1)
5.3%
(1)
73.7%
(14)
SC dog (7)
85.7%
(6)
42.9%
(3)
28.6%
(2)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
SC bird (9)
100.0%
(9)
55.5%
(5)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
PR human, nonclinical (5)
100.0%
(5)
100.0%
(5)
40.0%
(2)
60.0%
(3)
0.0%
(0)
44.4%
(2)
SC human, nonclinical (15)
100.0%
(15)
66.7%
(10)
33.3%
(5)
13.3%
(2)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
PR human, clinical (42)
71.4%
(30)
50.0%
(21)
33.3%
(14)
19.0%
(8)
0.0%
(0)
7.1%
(3)
SC human, clinical (10)
90.0%
(9)
90.0%
(9)
30.0%
(3)
70.0%
(7)
0.0%
(0)
10.0%
(1)Eight (100%)E. faecalis isolates from SC beach water contained one or more of the following genes:gelE (100%),asa1 (12.5%), andcylA (12.5%) (Table 3). Fourteen (70%)E. faecalis isolates from urban runoff containedgelE (70%),asa1 (10%), andesp (1%).gelE was present among wrack and eelgrass; however, the other virulence genes were rare or absent in occurrence.E. faecalis from dogs containedgelE (85.7%),asa1 (42.9%), andesp (28.6%); isolates from birds containedgelE (100%) andasa1 (55.5%).The frequency of enterococcal virulence genes differed betweenE. faecalis andE. faecium. Virulence genes were absent among the majority ofE. faecium beach water isolates from PR and SC (62.5% and 100%), respectively (Table 4). Interestingly, enterococcal virulence genes were also rare amongE. faecium from sewage from SC and septage from PR.esp was the most common virulence gene found amongE. faecium from humans (12.5% to 83.3%). Ten clinical isolates ofE. faecium from SC that were identified as vancomycin resistant strains by OCPHL were positive for theesp (80%) andhyl (10%) genes. In SC, none of the 5 virulence genes were detected amongE. faecium isolates obtained from dog stools, wrack, and beach sand.gelE was the only virulence gene found amongE. faecium from eelgrass.Table 4
Distribution of virulence factor genes amongE. faecium isolates from Southern California (SC) and Puerto Rico (PR).
Source (number) of isolates
% (number) of isolates for the following virulence factor genes:
gelE
asa1
esp
cylA
hyl
None
SC beach water (10)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
100%
(1)
PR beach water (32)
37.5%
(12)
25.0%
(8)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
62.5%
(20)
SC wrack (5)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
100%
(5)
SC eelgrass (3)
33.0%
(1)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
67.0%
(2)
SC sand (5)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
100%
(5)
SC urban runoff (8)
50.0%
(4)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
50.0%
(4)
SC sewage influent (3)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
100%
(3)
SC sewage effluent (11)
9.1%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
90.9%
(10)
PR septage (26)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
100%
(26)
SC dog (3)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
100%
(3)
SC bird (8)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
37.5%
(3)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
62.5%
(5)
PR human, nonclinical (4)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
100%
(4)
SC human, nonclinical (8)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
12.5%
(1)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
87.5%
(7)
PR human, clinical (11)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
72.7%
(8)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
SC human, clinical (5)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
83.3%
(4)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
16.7%
(1)
SC vancomycin resistant enterococci (10)
0.0%
(0)
0.0%
(0)
80.0%
(8)
0.0%
(0)
10.0%
(1)
10.0%
(1)The distribution of enterococcal virulence genes was also compared based on categorizing the source ofE. faecalis andE. faecium isolates as environmental, animal, and human.E. faecalis isolates from human specimens (clinical and nonclinical) from both geographic locations had a higher frequency of the five virulence genes overall (Figure 1).gelE was the most abundant virulence gene found amongE. faecalis isolates from human, animal, and environmental sources (59.6% to 95%), followed byasa1 (15.4% to 78.4%).cylA was found among 19.0% to 41.7% ofE.faecalis human isolates and 4.9% to 19.0% environmental isolates and not detected in animal isolates.Figure 1
Distribution of virulence factor genes amongE. faecalis isolates from environmental, animal, and human sources in Puerto Rico (PR) and Southern California (SC).esp was the most commonly found virulence gene detected amongE. faecium isolates (0% to 47.9%), followed bygelE (0% to 18.8%),asa1 (0% to 12.5%), andhyl (0% to 1.3%) (Figure 2). At both study sites, human derivedE. faecium isolates had the highest frequency ofesp (36.4% to 47.9%).Figure 2
Distribution of virulence factor genes amongE. faecium isolates from environmental, animal, and human sources in Puerto Rico (PR) and Southern California (SC).


## 4. Discussion

E. faecalis andE. faecium obtained from multiple sources, including the beach environment, humans (clinical and nonclinical), animals, and birds in Southern California and Puerto Rico, harbored putative enterococcal virulence genes that differed in frequency depending on source. At both study locations, there was a higher prevalence of virulence genes amongE. faecalis as compared toE. faecium. Among both species groups, virulence genes were less abundant among beach strains overall compared to human isolates, which was also consistent with a similar study conducted in Australia [35].Enterococcal virulence genesasa1 (aggregation substance) andcylA (cytolysin activator) were found amongE. faecalis isolates from beach water, humans, dogs, and birds, indicative of strains with enhanced virulence potential.asa1 andcylA were first identified in the genome of multidrug resistantE. faecalis strain MMH594 and have also been associated withE. faecalis pathogenicity islands [16, 36]. Aggregation substance is encoded on a sex pheromone plasmid and mediates aggregation between bacteria, enabling the transfer of plasmids [37]. Cytolysins are toxins secreted by bacteria that damage cell membranes, facilitating the infection process.cylA can be carried on a plasmid or occur on the bacterial chromosome [38].The distribution ofasa1 andcylA amongE. faecalis from human clinical specimens was 90% and 70%, respectively, ofE. faecalis from SC as compared to 50% and 19%, respectively, of isolates from PR. These differences likely reflect variability in the types of clinical specimens analyzed from each study location; clinical isolates ofE. faecalis from SC were obtained from rectal swabs, urine, blood, abscess, ascites, vagina, and joints; those from PR were obtained primarily from urine specimens.asa1 andesp were also found amongE. faecalis strains in dogs and birds (mostly seagull), suggesting that they may be important reservoirs of strains that could potentially be transferred to humans.esp is thought to aid enterococci in evading the immune system and also form biofilm [36, 39], which facilities colonization ofE. faecalis in acute urinary tract infections [14]. Animals and birds have been suggested as potential sources of virulent strains to humans;gelE,asa1,esp, andcylA were detected in fecalE. faecalis isolated from dogs at veterinary hospitals [40, 41], poultry [42], and ducks and wild geese [43]. The presence of these genes amongE. faecalis strains from dogs and birds warrants further studies to assess potential human health risks.Among the virulence genes analyzed,gelE was the most frequently detected and widely distributed amongE. faecalis strains from multiple sources, including the environment which is consistent with previous studies [9, 44, 45].gelE is thought to enhance survivability of enterococci in extraintestinal environments [46].In the beach environment,E. faecium was rare among enterococci identified from eelgrass, sewage influent, and dog samples, thus limiting the number of isolates that could be analyzed for virulence genes.E. faecium andE. faecalis were also rare or not detected in composite fecal samples from horses, goats, and pigs from PR, which is consistent with studies showing the low prevalence of these species in livestock [43, 47, 48]. Birds were rarely observed at the study beaches in PR, which precluded efforts to obtain enterococci isolates.It is important to note that the presence of virulent strains amongE. faecalis andE. faecium alone is not predictive of infection as there may be other mediators of pathogenicity that have yet to be elucidated [49]. It has been suggested that pathogenicity is also related to the ability of virulent strains to grow in high densities in the intestinal tract and spread to other sites in the body [50]. Host factors, such as predisposing medical conditions, immune status, and exposure to antibiotics, are also thought to play a role in the ability of enterococci to establish infection [51].


## 5. Conclusion

The low incidence ofasa1,esp, andcylA amongE. faecalis andE. faecium from the PR and SC beaches indicates that these virulence genes were not widely disseminated among strains found here, suggesting low potential health risks to humans. Still, the presence ofE. faecalis andE. faecium harboringasa1,esp, andcylA suggests humans, birds, and dogs as potential sources of enterococci to beach water. Future surveys of enterococcal virulence genes at beaches should include those with different source inputs and populations of enterococci.



---

*Source: 3437214-2016-04-10.xml*