# Fabrication and Assessment of ZnO Modified Polyethersulfone Membranes for Fouling Reduction of Bovine Serum Albumin

Authors: Tshepo Duncan Dipheko; Kgabo Philemon Matabola; Kate Kotlhao; Richard M. Moutloali; Michael Klink
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

ZnO/PES composite membranes were fabricated by phase inversion method using DMAc as a solvent. The structure of ZnO was investigated using TEM, SEM, XRD, and TGA. TEM images of ZnO nanoparticles were well-defined, small, and spherically shaped with agglomerated nanoparticles particles of 50 nm. The SEM and XRD results were an indication that ZnO nanoparticles were present in the prepared ZnO/PES composites membranes. Contact angle measurements were used to investigate surface structures of the composite membranes. The amount of ZnO nanoparticles on PES membranes was varied to obtain the optimal performance of the composite membranes in terms of pure water flux, flux recovery, and fouling resistance using the protein bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a model organic foulant. The results showed that addition of ZnO to PES membranes improved the hydrophilicity, permeation, and fouling resistance properties of the membranes. Pure water flux increased from a low of 250 L/m2h for the neat membrane to a high of 410 L/m2h for the composite membranes. A high flux recovery of 80–94% was obtained for the composite membranes. The optimal performance of the composite membranes was obtained at 1.5 wt% of ZnO.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The use of polyethersulfone (PES) in the preparation of membranes for water treatment is widespread [1–4]. This is primarily because the high mechanical strength properties of the polymer material used in fabricating the membranes make its application in water treatment desirable. The main drawback of the membranes produced from PES is that they are relatively hydrophobic and have an inherent problem of fouling [5–8].Several approaches have been explored to alleviate the fouling problem of PES membranes. These are grafting of the membranes with surface functionalities to enhance hydrophilic surface characteristics [9–11], impacting substances with catalytic properties to degrade foulants on the membrane surface [12–14], and impacting substances with antibacterial effects to limit the adhesion of biomolecules/bacteria that lead to biofouling [4, 15, 16]. Incorporating nanoparticles to increase surface hydrophilicity of the membranes in water treatment has received more attention, recently. This is due to their antibacterial characteristics, high surface to volume ratio, and photocatalytic activity [4, 9, 12, 17].Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is among the commonly used nanoparticles for enhancing surface hydrophilicity and water permeation [9, 17, 18]. However, the extensive use of TiO2 nanoparticles has over time shown that its photocatalytic activity is limited [19]. Due to this limitation, more research efforts have been directed towards making its application in water treatment effective. Among others is the use of dopants like silver, platinum, and gold as examples [20–22].On the other hand, ZnO received less attention compared to TiO2. However, it has similar or better desirable properties such as large surface area to volume ratio, mechanical and chemical properties, and photocatalysis (with a higher band gap than TiO2). It is more cost-effective than TiO2 [23]. These properties have widened its application to various areas such as solar cells [24], biosensors [25], and photocatalysis [26–28] and recently in water treatment [29, 30].The positive improvement of nanoparticles incorporated into membranes in water treatment depends on their ability to enhance surface hydrophilicity and water permeability. When ZnO nanoparticles were incorporated into PES, a low flux decline and better permeability were obtained [23]. Another study by Leo et al. [31] showed a significant reduction on hydrophobicity of the ZnO/polysulfone (Psf) membrane and an improvement on the fouling resistance by oleic acid. Shen et al. [32] used bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a protein foulant on ZnO/PES composite membranes and indicated that there was essentially no change on BSA rejection ratio from the lowest amount (0.1) of ZnO to the highest (0.4). This could mean that addition of ZnO had no effect on pore size of the PES membranes. The other reason could be that the increase in pore size did not exceed the molecular weight of the protein, BSA. These results were in agreement with that observed by Balta et al. [23]. Contrary to the results by Shen et al. and Balta et al., addition of ZnO nanoparticles into polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane had some effect on the rejection of the model foulant [33]. Another point to note from Shen et al. paper is that the ZnO/PES membranes were prepared using polyethylene glycol (PEG-400) additive and N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) as solvent.In the present study, the objective was to prepare ZnO embedded PES membranes by phase inversion method using DMAc (as a solvent) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (as pore former additive and to reduce aggregation of nanoparticles) to improve water permeation and fouling resistance. It has been indicated that DMAc enhances porosity far much better than NMP and that high porosity leads to high water fluxes [32, 34]. The ZnO/PES membranes’ performance was investigated through pure water flux and flux recovery using BSA as model organic foulant. The amount of ZnO nanoparticles for optimal performance of the ZnO/PES composite membranes was investigated.


## 2. Experimental Section

### 2.1. Materials and Equipment

Polyethersulfone (PES MW = 232.258 g/mol) was supplied by Solvay Plastics. Dimethylacetamide (DMAc), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP MW = 10,000 g/mol), zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and bovine serum albumin (BSA, MW = 66000 Da) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. All reagents were used without any further purification. Freshly deionized water was used in all the preparations.


### 2.2. Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles

ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized using established protocols [28, 35, 36]. In short, aqueous solution of NaOH (0.4 M) was added dropwise into an aqueous solution of zinc acetate (Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O, 0.2 M) to induce precipitation of zinc hydroxide nanoparticles at 60°C, pH = 12.0, for 1 h. The mixture was left to stir under these conditions for a further 1 h. The reaction mixture was cooled down to room temperature, centrifuged, and washed with copious amount of water and ethanol for effective removal of impurities. The final product was dried at 60°C for 24 h and subsequently calcined at 500°C overnight.


### 2.3. Preparation of Membranes

Neat PES membranes were prepared via phase inversion induced by immersion precipitation [11, 37, 38]. A DMAc solution of PES (18 wt.%) and PVP (2 wt.%) was prepared. Following the complete dissolution of the polymers, varying amounts of ZnO nanoparticles (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 wt.%) were introduced and the resultant mixture agitated through vigorous stirring until a consistent mixture was obtained, in about 12 h [39]. The polymer-ZnO homogeneous mixture was first degassed under vacuum for 4 h and subsequently spread on a glass plate and cast using an automated knife. The cast film was immersed into an aqueous bath after 30 s in air. The formed membrane that peeled from the glass plate was stored in fresh water for 18 h to allow complete solvent removal from the film. Composition of the reagents used in preparation of ZnO/PES is shown in Table 1.Table 1
Composition of the casting solution used to prepare ZnO/PES membrane composites.
Membranes  PES wt.% PVP wt.% ZnO wt.% DMAc wt.% Pure PES A 18 2 0 80 PES/ZnO B 18 2 0.5 80 PES/ZnO C 18 2 1 80 PES/ZnO D 18 2 1.5 80 PES/ZnO E 18 2 2 80


### 2.4. Characterisation of ZnO Nanoparticles

The surface morphology of zinc oxide nanoparticles was studied using the transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM is a technique used to produce images of a sample by passing a beam of electrons through a sample. TEM is based on transmitted electrons. The beam of electrons interacts with the sample forming images. TEM images are focused onto an imaging device. TEM has a high magnification that can go into the nanoscale range and therefore can be used to see what is inside the material, that is, beyond the surface of the material.


### 2.5. Characteristics of Membrane Surface

The physical characteristics of the membranes were assessed using a combination of techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), contact angle (CA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermal analysis (TA). In order to visualise the membrane surface structure and morphology, membranes were assessed using scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI NOVA-nanoSEM 200). The samples were coated by sputtering with gold and the micrographs obtained at operating voltage of 30 keV and the current of 10 mA Contact angles of the prepared membranes were measured using a DSA 10 Mk2 (Krüss, Germany) equipment. A water drop was lowered onto the membrane’s surface from a needle tip and a magnified image of the droplet was recorded by a digital camera until no further changes were observed. Static contact angles were determined from these images with calculation software. To minimize the experimental error, the contact angle measurement was taken as the mean value of 5 different points on each membrane sample. To confirm the presence of nanoparticles in the membranes, the X-ray diffraction analysis was done using a Bruker equipment (D8 ADVANCE axes) with a monochromatic Cu Kα radiation (λ=0.154 nm) source operated at 40 mA and 40 kV between 20° and 70°. Finally, thermal analysis of the membranes were evaluated using simultaneous thermal analyser (Netzsch, STA429 CD) under a nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10°C/min. from 20°C to 800°C.


### 2.6. Membrane Performance

The performance of the membrane was measured through permeation flux, pure water permeability (membrane hydraulic resistance), and flux recovery after passing protein bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the model foulant. The pure water flux was obtained from a filtration system that contained a Sterlitech HP4750 dead-end stirred filtration cell with an effective area and volume of 14.6 cm2 and 250 mL, respectively. The nitrogen gas compressed in a cylinder gas was controlled by a regulator. The procedure involved first compacting the membranes at 150 KPa for 30 min, followed by reducing the operating pressure to 100 KPa to obtain the membrane performance at ambient temperature.Pure water flux (Jwi) was obtained after a steady flow was reached and calculated using(1)Jwi=VA·t,where Jwi is the pure water flux (L/m2h), V is the permeate volume (L), A is the membrane area (m2), and t is the time (h). Average flux was calculated from an average obtained from five samples per membrane cast with five measurements for each sample.In obtaining the flux recovery (FR), the membranes used for BSA rejection were rinsed with deionized water by filling and shaking the cell for 1 min. three times. Thereafter, the deionized water flux (Jww) was measured again using the cleaned membrane. The flux recovery (FR) was calculated utilising the following equation:(2)FR%=JwwJwi×100,where Jww and Jwi are the pure water flux of fouled and virgin membranes, respectively.


## 2.1. Materials and Equipment

Polyethersulfone (PES MW = 232.258 g/mol) was supplied by Solvay Plastics. Dimethylacetamide (DMAc), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP MW = 10,000 g/mol), zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and bovine serum albumin (BSA, MW = 66000 Da) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. All reagents were used without any further purification. Freshly deionized water was used in all the preparations.


## 2.2. Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles

ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized using established protocols [28, 35, 36]. In short, aqueous solution of NaOH (0.4 M) was added dropwise into an aqueous solution of zinc acetate (Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O, 0.2 M) to induce precipitation of zinc hydroxide nanoparticles at 60°C, pH = 12.0, for 1 h. The mixture was left to stir under these conditions for a further 1 h. The reaction mixture was cooled down to room temperature, centrifuged, and washed with copious amount of water and ethanol for effective removal of impurities. The final product was dried at 60°C for 24 h and subsequently calcined at 500°C overnight.


## 2.3. Preparation of Membranes

Neat PES membranes were prepared via phase inversion induced by immersion precipitation [11, 37, 38]. A DMAc solution of PES (18 wt.%) and PVP (2 wt.%) was prepared. Following the complete dissolution of the polymers, varying amounts of ZnO nanoparticles (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 wt.%) were introduced and the resultant mixture agitated through vigorous stirring until a consistent mixture was obtained, in about 12 h [39]. The polymer-ZnO homogeneous mixture was first degassed under vacuum for 4 h and subsequently spread on a glass plate and cast using an automated knife. The cast film was immersed into an aqueous bath after 30 s in air. The formed membrane that peeled from the glass plate was stored in fresh water for 18 h to allow complete solvent removal from the film. Composition of the reagents used in preparation of ZnO/PES is shown in Table 1.Table 1
Composition of the casting solution used to prepare ZnO/PES membrane composites.
Membranes  PES wt.% PVP wt.% ZnO wt.% DMAc wt.% Pure PES A 18 2 0 80 PES/ZnO B 18 2 0.5 80 PES/ZnO C 18 2 1 80 PES/ZnO D 18 2 1.5 80 PES/ZnO E 18 2 2 80


## 2.4. Characterisation of ZnO Nanoparticles

The surface morphology of zinc oxide nanoparticles was studied using the transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM is a technique used to produce images of a sample by passing a beam of electrons through a sample. TEM is based on transmitted electrons. The beam of electrons interacts with the sample forming images. TEM images are focused onto an imaging device. TEM has a high magnification that can go into the nanoscale range and therefore can be used to see what is inside the material, that is, beyond the surface of the material.


## 2.5. Characteristics of Membrane Surface

The physical characteristics of the membranes were assessed using a combination of techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), contact angle (CA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermal analysis (TA). In order to visualise the membrane surface structure and morphology, membranes were assessed using scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI NOVA-nanoSEM 200). The samples were coated by sputtering with gold and the micrographs obtained at operating voltage of 30 keV and the current of 10 mA Contact angles of the prepared membranes were measured using a DSA 10 Mk2 (Krüss, Germany) equipment. A water drop was lowered onto the membrane’s surface from a needle tip and a magnified image of the droplet was recorded by a digital camera until no further changes were observed. Static contact angles were determined from these images with calculation software. To minimize the experimental error, the contact angle measurement was taken as the mean value of 5 different points on each membrane sample. To confirm the presence of nanoparticles in the membranes, the X-ray diffraction analysis was done using a Bruker equipment (D8 ADVANCE axes) with a monochromatic Cu Kα radiation (λ=0.154 nm) source operated at 40 mA and 40 kV between 20° and 70°. Finally, thermal analysis of the membranes were evaluated using simultaneous thermal analyser (Netzsch, STA429 CD) under a nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10°C/min. from 20°C to 800°C.


## 2.6. Membrane Performance

The performance of the membrane was measured through permeation flux, pure water permeability (membrane hydraulic resistance), and flux recovery after passing protein bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the model foulant. The pure water flux was obtained from a filtration system that contained a Sterlitech HP4750 dead-end stirred filtration cell with an effective area and volume of 14.6 cm2 and 250 mL, respectively. The nitrogen gas compressed in a cylinder gas was controlled by a regulator. The procedure involved first compacting the membranes at 150 KPa for 30 min, followed by reducing the operating pressure to 100 KPa to obtain the membrane performance at ambient temperature.Pure water flux (Jwi) was obtained after a steady flow was reached and calculated using(1)Jwi=VA·t,where Jwi is the pure water flux (L/m2h), V is the permeate volume (L), A is the membrane area (m2), and t is the time (h). Average flux was calculated from an average obtained from five samples per membrane cast with five measurements for each sample.In obtaining the flux recovery (FR), the membranes used for BSA rejection were rinsed with deionized water by filling and shaking the cell for 1 min. three times. Thereafter, the deionized water flux (Jww) was measured again using the cleaned membrane. The flux recovery (FR) was calculated utilising the following equation:(2)FR%=JwwJwi×100,where Jww and Jwi are the pure water flux of fouled and virgin membranes, respectively.


## 3. Results and Discussions

### 3.1. ZnO Nanoparticles Morphology

The morphology of zinc oxide was studied using the TEM. The micrograph was taken at 100 nm as shown in Figure1.Figure 1
TEM images of ZnO nanoparticles.TEM studies were carried out to find out the structure and exact particle size of the synthesized ZnO. The structure of ZnO nanoparticles mainly adopted a hexagonal configuration. The number of alternating planes composed of tetrahedral coordinated O−2 and Zn+2 ions is stacked alternatively along c-axis [40]. TEM images of ZnO nanoparticles are well-defined, small, and spherically shaped with agglomerated particles. TEM images, in Figure 1, show particle size of ZnO nanoparticles in the range of 50 nm–80 nm.


### 3.2. Membrane Physical Property Characterisation

#### 3.2.1. SEM Analysis of the Membrane Surfaces

The surfaces of the fabricated membranes were observed using SEM. Figure2 shows the neat PES membranes as well as those containing ZnO nanoparticles. From the micrographs, the surfaces before and after addition of the nanoparticles remained essentially the same. This was true for all membranes; however, at the highest amount of ZnO nanoparticles (2 wt%) added, clustering of nanoparticles was evident. All the membranes exhibited similar pore-like structure on their surfaces.Figure 2
SEM images of (a) pure PES; (b) PES/ZnO (0.5%); (c) PES/ZnO (1.0%); (d) PES/ZnO (1.5%); (e) PES/ZnO (2.0%).
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)


#### 3.2.2. Surface Hydrophilicity of the Membranes Using Contact Angle Measurement

The contact angle (CA) is the angle at which the liquid meets the solid surface. The surface can be classified as hydrophobic or hydrophilic, if the CA is 90° <θ < 180° or 0 < θ < 90°, respectively [41]. Contact angles (CA) of all membranes were measured at 25°C and the recorded values are an average of five readings. The CA of the membranes showed a steady decline with increasing amount of ZnO nanoparticles (Figure 3). The CA decreased from 87° for the neat membrane to a low of 53° for the composite membrane containing 1.5 wt.% ZnO nanoparticles. This was an indication that ZnO nanoparticles enhanced surface hydrophilicity of the PES membrane. This was attributed to the fact that ZnO has a higher affinity for water [10]. A more hydrophilic membrane surface is expected to improve the water flux and fouling resistance [32].Figure 3
Contact angle measurements of composite ZnO/PES membranes at different amounts of ZnO nanoparticles from (0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 to 2 wt%).A sudden increase in CA was observed at 2.0 wt% ZnO. The CA of 64° was recorded at this amount. A similar trend was observed by Damodar et al. (2009) [42] in which the CA of 1 wt% of TiO2 in TiO2/PVDF composite membrane was lower than at 4 wt% TiO2. The apparent reversal of the trend at 2 wt.% of ZnO nanoparticle was attributed to agglomeration and aggregation of nanoparticles on the membrane matrix leading to surface inhomogeneity [42].


#### 3.2.3. XRD Analysis of the Membrane Surfaces

The presence of ZnO nanoparticles in the membrane matrix was confirmed by XRD analysis. Figure4 shows the diffractograms of unsupported ZnO nanoparticles (A), neat PES (B) membrane, and ZnO containing PES membrane (C). The unsupported ZnO nanoparticles exhibited dominant peaks at 2θ angles of 36.91°, 39.98°, 42.17°, and 55.78° which correspond to the main characteristic peaks of zinc oxide nanoparticles [43, 44]. The neat PES membrane in contrast showed a diffractogram with diffuse broad peaks, indicative of amorphous materials [45]. The composite membrane on the other hand showed characteristic peaks of both the ZnO nanoparticles and neat membrane as expected for such a composite. For example, the ZnO/PES composite membrane had peaks at 2θ angles at 35.62°, 37.73°, 30.20°, and 53.25° which correspond to the unsupported ZnO nanoparticles. The XRD results were an indication that ZnO nanoparticles were present in the prepared ZnO/PES composites membranes [32]. It is worth noting that these diffraction peaks were slightly shifted to lower angles, which was unexpected. Previous studies of ZnO incorporated in PES membrane matrix did not report on the XRD studies. However, similar observations were reported for PES membranes incorporated with TiO2 nanoparticles [18].Figure 4
XRD patterns of PES membrane: (a) ZnO/PES composite, (b) pure PES, and (c) ZnO nanoparticles.
(a) (b) (c)


#### 3.2.4. Thermal Analysis of the Membranes

Thermal analysis (TGA) provides information on the decomposition temperature (Td) of a substance. It is defined as the temperature at 3% weight loss [46]. A simultaneous thermal analyser (Netzsch, STA429 CD) was used to investigate the weight loss of both the neat PES and composite membranes. The decomposition temperature of the pure PES and ZnO/PES membrane followed a similar trend. The temperature gradually increased with increasing addition of ZnO on PES membranes (Figure 5). Similar observations were reported by Li et al. (2008) and Wu et al. (2008) [1, 46], when TiO2 nanoparticles were incorporated into PES membranes. Addition of TiO2 nanoparticles improved the thermal stability of the PES membranes.Figure 5
TGA results for increasing decomposition temperature for (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 wt%) of ZnO on PES membranes.


### 3.3. Effect of ZnO on PES Membrane Performance

#### 3.3.1. Pure Water Flux and Flux Recovery

The dead-end cell was used to measure the filtration properties of the membranes at 25°C. It was observed that the pure water flux of the composite membranes was higher than that of the neat membrane (Figure6). As the weight of ZnO nanoparticles increased from 0 to 2 wt.%, the water flux of the membrane increased to a peak value and decreased slightly beyond 1.5 wt% ZnO. It increased from a low of 250 L/m2h for the neat membrane to a high of 410 L/m2h for the composite membrane with 1.5 wt.% ZnO. The increasing flux was attributed to increasing permeability of the composite membranes due to incorporation of ZnO nanoparticles [32]. The highest flux was obtained at 1.5 wt.% ZnO nanoparticles in the PES membrane. This corresponds to the lowest contact angle recorded at 1.5 wt.% ZnO nanoparticles (Figure 3). Both the lowest contact angle and the highest flux results were attributed to an enhanced surface hydrophilicity or pore size enlargement [31]. However, pore size determination was not done in this study. At the 2.0 wt% ZnO, there was a reversal which was attributed to pore size and nanoparticle aggregation that lead to pore blockages and hence reduced flux [47].Figure 6
Pure water flux and flux recovery, FR% (after filtration of BSA) changes with the addition of ZnO nanoparticles.Figure6 also shows that flux recovery was influenced by the incorporation of ZnO nanoparticles. Whereas this was at 60% for the neat PES membrane, the composite membranes were between a good recovery of 80 and 94%. The improved flux recovery confirmed that the prepared ZnO/PES composite membranes exhibited enhanced fouling resistance properties.


## 3.1. ZnO Nanoparticles Morphology

The morphology of zinc oxide was studied using the TEM. The micrograph was taken at 100 nm as shown in Figure1.Figure 1
TEM images of ZnO nanoparticles.TEM studies were carried out to find out the structure and exact particle size of the synthesized ZnO. The structure of ZnO nanoparticles mainly adopted a hexagonal configuration. The number of alternating planes composed of tetrahedral coordinated O−2 and Zn+2 ions is stacked alternatively along c-axis [40]. TEM images of ZnO nanoparticles are well-defined, small, and spherically shaped with agglomerated particles. TEM images, in Figure 1, show particle size of ZnO nanoparticles in the range of 50 nm–80 nm.


## 3.2. Membrane Physical Property Characterisation

### 3.2.1. SEM Analysis of the Membrane Surfaces

The surfaces of the fabricated membranes were observed using SEM. Figure2 shows the neat PES membranes as well as those containing ZnO nanoparticles. From the micrographs, the surfaces before and after addition of the nanoparticles remained essentially the same. This was true for all membranes; however, at the highest amount of ZnO nanoparticles (2 wt%) added, clustering of nanoparticles was evident. All the membranes exhibited similar pore-like structure on their surfaces.Figure 2
SEM images of (a) pure PES; (b) PES/ZnO (0.5%); (c) PES/ZnO (1.0%); (d) PES/ZnO (1.5%); (e) PES/ZnO (2.0%).
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)


### 3.2.2. Surface Hydrophilicity of the Membranes Using Contact Angle Measurement

The contact angle (CA) is the angle at which the liquid meets the solid surface. The surface can be classified as hydrophobic or hydrophilic, if the CA is 90° <θ < 180° or 0 < θ < 90°, respectively [41]. Contact angles (CA) of all membranes were measured at 25°C and the recorded values are an average of five readings. The CA of the membranes showed a steady decline with increasing amount of ZnO nanoparticles (Figure 3). The CA decreased from 87° for the neat membrane to a low of 53° for the composite membrane containing 1.5 wt.% ZnO nanoparticles. This was an indication that ZnO nanoparticles enhanced surface hydrophilicity of the PES membrane. This was attributed to the fact that ZnO has a higher affinity for water [10]. A more hydrophilic membrane surface is expected to improve the water flux and fouling resistance [32].Figure 3
Contact angle measurements of composite ZnO/PES membranes at different amounts of ZnO nanoparticles from (0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 to 2 wt%).A sudden increase in CA was observed at 2.0 wt% ZnO. The CA of 64° was recorded at this amount. A similar trend was observed by Damodar et al. (2009) [42] in which the CA of 1 wt% of TiO2 in TiO2/PVDF composite membrane was lower than at 4 wt% TiO2. The apparent reversal of the trend at 2 wt.% of ZnO nanoparticle was attributed to agglomeration and aggregation of nanoparticles on the membrane matrix leading to surface inhomogeneity [42].


### 3.2.3. XRD Analysis of the Membrane Surfaces

The presence of ZnO nanoparticles in the membrane matrix was confirmed by XRD analysis. Figure4 shows the diffractograms of unsupported ZnO nanoparticles (A), neat PES (B) membrane, and ZnO containing PES membrane (C). The unsupported ZnO nanoparticles exhibited dominant peaks at 2θ angles of 36.91°, 39.98°, 42.17°, and 55.78° which correspond to the main characteristic peaks of zinc oxide nanoparticles [43, 44]. The neat PES membrane in contrast showed a diffractogram with diffuse broad peaks, indicative of amorphous materials [45]. The composite membrane on the other hand showed characteristic peaks of both the ZnO nanoparticles and neat membrane as expected for such a composite. For example, the ZnO/PES composite membrane had peaks at 2θ angles at 35.62°, 37.73°, 30.20°, and 53.25° which correspond to the unsupported ZnO nanoparticles. The XRD results were an indication that ZnO nanoparticles were present in the prepared ZnO/PES composites membranes [32]. It is worth noting that these diffraction peaks were slightly shifted to lower angles, which was unexpected. Previous studies of ZnO incorporated in PES membrane matrix did not report on the XRD studies. However, similar observations were reported for PES membranes incorporated with TiO2 nanoparticles [18].Figure 4
XRD patterns of PES membrane: (a) ZnO/PES composite, (b) pure PES, and (c) ZnO nanoparticles.
(a) (b) (c)


### 3.2.4. Thermal Analysis of the Membranes

Thermal analysis (TGA) provides information on the decomposition temperature (Td) of a substance. It is defined as the temperature at 3% weight loss [46]. A simultaneous thermal analyser (Netzsch, STA429 CD) was used to investigate the weight loss of both the neat PES and composite membranes. The decomposition temperature of the pure PES and ZnO/PES membrane followed a similar trend. The temperature gradually increased with increasing addition of ZnO on PES membranes (Figure 5). Similar observations were reported by Li et al. (2008) and Wu et al. (2008) [1, 46], when TiO2 nanoparticles were incorporated into PES membranes. Addition of TiO2 nanoparticles improved the thermal stability of the PES membranes.Figure 5
TGA results for increasing decomposition temperature for (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 wt%) of ZnO on PES membranes.


## 3.2.1. SEM Analysis of the Membrane Surfaces

The surfaces of the fabricated membranes were observed using SEM. Figure2 shows the neat PES membranes as well as those containing ZnO nanoparticles. From the micrographs, the surfaces before and after addition of the nanoparticles remained essentially the same. This was true for all membranes; however, at the highest amount of ZnO nanoparticles (2 wt%) added, clustering of nanoparticles was evident. All the membranes exhibited similar pore-like structure on their surfaces.Figure 2
SEM images of (a) pure PES; (b) PES/ZnO (0.5%); (c) PES/ZnO (1.0%); (d) PES/ZnO (1.5%); (e) PES/ZnO (2.0%).
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)


## 3.2.2. Surface Hydrophilicity of the Membranes Using Contact Angle Measurement

The contact angle (CA) is the angle at which the liquid meets the solid surface. The surface can be classified as hydrophobic or hydrophilic, if the CA is 90° <θ < 180° or 0 < θ < 90°, respectively [41]. Contact angles (CA) of all membranes were measured at 25°C and the recorded values are an average of five readings. The CA of the membranes showed a steady decline with increasing amount of ZnO nanoparticles (Figure 3). The CA decreased from 87° for the neat membrane to a low of 53° for the composite membrane containing 1.5 wt.% ZnO nanoparticles. This was an indication that ZnO nanoparticles enhanced surface hydrophilicity of the PES membrane. This was attributed to the fact that ZnO has a higher affinity for water [10]. A more hydrophilic membrane surface is expected to improve the water flux and fouling resistance [32].Figure 3
Contact angle measurements of composite ZnO/PES membranes at different amounts of ZnO nanoparticles from (0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 to 2 wt%).A sudden increase in CA was observed at 2.0 wt% ZnO. The CA of 64° was recorded at this amount. A similar trend was observed by Damodar et al. (2009) [42] in which the CA of 1 wt% of TiO2 in TiO2/PVDF composite membrane was lower than at 4 wt% TiO2. The apparent reversal of the trend at 2 wt.% of ZnO nanoparticle was attributed to agglomeration and aggregation of nanoparticles on the membrane matrix leading to surface inhomogeneity [42].


## 3.2.3. XRD Analysis of the Membrane Surfaces

The presence of ZnO nanoparticles in the membrane matrix was confirmed by XRD analysis. Figure4 shows the diffractograms of unsupported ZnO nanoparticles (A), neat PES (B) membrane, and ZnO containing PES membrane (C). The unsupported ZnO nanoparticles exhibited dominant peaks at 2θ angles of 36.91°, 39.98°, 42.17°, and 55.78° which correspond to the main characteristic peaks of zinc oxide nanoparticles [43, 44]. The neat PES membrane in contrast showed a diffractogram with diffuse broad peaks, indicative of amorphous materials [45]. The composite membrane on the other hand showed characteristic peaks of both the ZnO nanoparticles and neat membrane as expected for such a composite. For example, the ZnO/PES composite membrane had peaks at 2θ angles at 35.62°, 37.73°, 30.20°, and 53.25° which correspond to the unsupported ZnO nanoparticles. The XRD results were an indication that ZnO nanoparticles were present in the prepared ZnO/PES composites membranes [32]. It is worth noting that these diffraction peaks were slightly shifted to lower angles, which was unexpected. Previous studies of ZnO incorporated in PES membrane matrix did not report on the XRD studies. However, similar observations were reported for PES membranes incorporated with TiO2 nanoparticles [18].Figure 4
XRD patterns of PES membrane: (a) ZnO/PES composite, (b) pure PES, and (c) ZnO nanoparticles.
(a) (b) (c)


## 3.2.4. Thermal Analysis of the Membranes

Thermal analysis (TGA) provides information on the decomposition temperature (Td) of a substance. It is defined as the temperature at 3% weight loss [46]. A simultaneous thermal analyser (Netzsch, STA429 CD) was used to investigate the weight loss of both the neat PES and composite membranes. The decomposition temperature of the pure PES and ZnO/PES membrane followed a similar trend. The temperature gradually increased with increasing addition of ZnO on PES membranes (Figure 5). Similar observations were reported by Li et al. (2008) and Wu et al. (2008) [1, 46], when TiO2 nanoparticles were incorporated into PES membranes. Addition of TiO2 nanoparticles improved the thermal stability of the PES membranes.Figure 5
TGA results for increasing decomposition temperature for (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 wt%) of ZnO on PES membranes.


## 3.3. Effect of ZnO on PES Membrane Performance

### 3.3.1. Pure Water Flux and Flux Recovery

The dead-end cell was used to measure the filtration properties of the membranes at 25°C. It was observed that the pure water flux of the composite membranes was higher than that of the neat membrane (Figure6). As the weight of ZnO nanoparticles increased from 0 to 2 wt.%, the water flux of the membrane increased to a peak value and decreased slightly beyond 1.5 wt% ZnO. It increased from a low of 250 L/m2h for the neat membrane to a high of 410 L/m2h for the composite membrane with 1.5 wt.% ZnO. The increasing flux was attributed to increasing permeability of the composite membranes due to incorporation of ZnO nanoparticles [32]. The highest flux was obtained at 1.5 wt.% ZnO nanoparticles in the PES membrane. This corresponds to the lowest contact angle recorded at 1.5 wt.% ZnO nanoparticles (Figure 3). Both the lowest contact angle and the highest flux results were attributed to an enhanced surface hydrophilicity or pore size enlargement [31]. However, pore size determination was not done in this study. At the 2.0 wt% ZnO, there was a reversal which was attributed to pore size and nanoparticle aggregation that lead to pore blockages and hence reduced flux [47].Figure 6
Pure water flux and flux recovery, FR% (after filtration of BSA) changes with the addition of ZnO nanoparticles.Figure6 also shows that flux recovery was influenced by the incorporation of ZnO nanoparticles. Whereas this was at 60% for the neat PES membrane, the composite membranes were between a good recovery of 80 and 94%. The improved flux recovery confirmed that the prepared ZnO/PES composite membranes exhibited enhanced fouling resistance properties.


## 3.3.1. Pure Water Flux and Flux Recovery

The dead-end cell was used to measure the filtration properties of the membranes at 25°C. It was observed that the pure water flux of the composite membranes was higher than that of the neat membrane (Figure6). As the weight of ZnO nanoparticles increased from 0 to 2 wt.%, the water flux of the membrane increased to a peak value and decreased slightly beyond 1.5 wt% ZnO. It increased from a low of 250 L/m2h for the neat membrane to a high of 410 L/m2h for the composite membrane with 1.5 wt.% ZnO. The increasing flux was attributed to increasing permeability of the composite membranes due to incorporation of ZnO nanoparticles [32]. The highest flux was obtained at 1.5 wt.% ZnO nanoparticles in the PES membrane. This corresponds to the lowest contact angle recorded at 1.5 wt.% ZnO nanoparticles (Figure 3). Both the lowest contact angle and the highest flux results were attributed to an enhanced surface hydrophilicity or pore size enlargement [31]. However, pore size determination was not done in this study. At the 2.0 wt% ZnO, there was a reversal which was attributed to pore size and nanoparticle aggregation that lead to pore blockages and hence reduced flux [47].Figure 6
Pure water flux and flux recovery, FR% (after filtration of BSA) changes with the addition of ZnO nanoparticles.Figure6 also shows that flux recovery was influenced by the incorporation of ZnO nanoparticles. Whereas this was at 60% for the neat PES membrane, the composite membranes were between a good recovery of 80 and 94%. The improved flux recovery confirmed that the prepared ZnO/PES composite membranes exhibited enhanced fouling resistance properties.


## 4. Conclusions

ZnO/PES composite membranes of different amounts of ZnO nanoparticles (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 wt%) were prepared by phase inversion using DMAc as the solvent. TEM images of ZnO nanoparticles were well-defined, small, and spherically shaped with agglomerated nanoparticles particles of 50 nm. The SEM and XRD results were an indication that ZnO nanoparticles were present in the prepared ZnO/PES composites membranes. Addition of TiO2 nanoparticles improved the thermal stability of the PES membrane showed by TGA. It was demonstrated that the ZnO/PES composite membranes surface hydrophilicity was greatly improved. The lowest value of ZnO/PES contact angle that corresponded to the highest hydrophilicity was 53°, obtained at 1.5 wt% ZnO nanoparticles. The performance of the membranes showed that pure water flux on ZnO/PES membrane was relatively higher when compared to the neat membrane. Finally, the flux recovery of within 80–94% was obtained for the composite membranes when compared to 60% of the neat membrane and the optimal performance of the composite membranes was obtained at 1.5 wt% ZnO.



---

*Source: 3587019-2017-01-19.xml*