# Prognostic and Clinical Significance of Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Index in Individuals with Liver Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Authors: Xiulan Peng; Yali Huang; Min Zhang; Yan Chen; Lihua Zhang; Anbing He; Renfeng Luo
Journal: Disease Markers
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Objective. This study was aimed at exploring the prognostic and clinicopathological roles of aspartate aminotransferase-to-lymphocyte ratio index (ALRI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma via a meta-analysis. Methods. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP databases were comprehensively searched from inception to November 20, 2021. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the relationship between ALRI and overall survival (OS) as well as progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Odds ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% CI were also used to investigate correlations between clinical factors and ALRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Results. A total of 3914 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma from eleven retrospective cohorts were included in this meta-analysis. The combined results revealed that patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with elevated ALRI tended to have unfavorable OS (HR 1.53 [95% CI 1.25–1.82]; P<0.001). Pooled HRs revealed that high ALRI was an independent risk factor for inferior PFS in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HR 1.36 [95% CI 1.10–1.63]; P<0.001). In addition, high ALRI was strongly associated with male sex (OR 1.32 [95% CI 1.02–1.70]; P=0.035), presence of cirrhosis (OR 1.68 [95% CI 1.01–2.81]; P=0.046), larger tumor size (OR 2.25 [95% CI 1.31–3.88]; P<0.001), presence of portal vein tumor thrombus (OR 2.50 [95% CI 1.52–4.11]; P<0.001), and distant metastasis (OR 1.72 [95% CI 1.05-2.82]; P=0.031). Conclusion. Elevated ALRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma predicted inferior survival outcomes and was strongly associated with some important features of hepatocellular carcinoma.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent cause of cancer-related death worldwide and ranks fifth in terms of incidence in the United States [1]. Unfortunately, the incidence of HCC continues to increase annually [2]. Recognized risk factors for HCC include hepatitis virus infection, alcohol-related cirrhosis, fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, diabetes, and various dietary exposures [3]. Because of the high rate of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among the Chinese population, the HCC causes heavy medical and economic burden in China, and China accounts for approximately 50% of HCC cases worldwide [4]. The prognosis of individuals with HCC is far from satisfactory partially due to the lack of accurate prognostic biomarkers. The primary role of prognostic indexes is to give an estimation of the aggressiveness of HCC on a case-by-case basis. The promising biomarkers related to HCC could be applied appropriately to stratify patients, thus enabling more accurate treatment allocation. Therefore, there is a highly urgent medical demand to identify reliable prognostic biomarkers, especially for HCC, that would be conducive to the design and development of optimal treatment regimens and improve the clinical outcomes of individuals with HCC.Recent studies have demonstrated that inflammatory response plays an essential role in the progression and metastasis of HCC [5–7]. Therefore, a panel of serum biomarkers based on inflammation parameters from routine bloodwork, such as systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) [8], prognostic nutritional index (PNI) [9], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [10], and Integrated Liver Inflammatory Score [11], have been demonstrated to be efficient prognostic biomarkers for patients with cancer. The aspartate aminotransferase- (AST-) to-lymphocyte ratio index (ALRI) is a novel inflammatory index for HCC [12] and is derived from the ratio of AST to lymphocyte count. ALRI has been reported to be related to the survival of patients with HCC [13–23]; however, results have not been consistent across studies. Therefore, we conducted the current meta-analysis to determine the prognostic impact and clinical significance of ALRI in patients with HCC by aggregating all available data.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. Search Strategy

This meta-analysis was prospectively enrolled in PROSPERO (ID:CRD42021238765, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/) and was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (i.e., PRISMA) statement [24]. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP databases were comprehensively searched from inception to November 20, 2021. Search terms included “liver cancer,” “liver neoplasm,” “hepatocellular carcinoma,” “HCC” AND “aspartate aminotransferase/lymphocyte,” “aspartate aminotransferase-to-lymphocyte ratio index,” “aspartate aminotransferase to lymphocyte ratio,” and “ALRI.” Additionally, the references of relevant studies were manually screened to identify additional potentially eligible studies. The included studies were restricted to those published in English and Chinese.


### 2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Study inclusion criteria were as follows: primary HCC was the only cancer diagnosis; age >18 years; individuals with HCC were classified into two groups based on an ALRI cut-off value; investigation of the association between ALRI and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with HCC; and reported hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for ALRI. Reviews, meta-analyses, letters, case reports, clinical studies without full text, or studies not reporting HR and 95% CI for ALRI were excluded.


### 2.3. Data Collection and Quality Evaluation

Two investigators (YH and MZ) independently reviewed the articles retrieved in the literature search and extracted the relevant data. Any disagreements were ultimately resolved by discussion with a third reviewer (RL). The following clinical information was extracted from the retrieved articles by LZ and YC: year of publication; author’s surname; study period; study design; staging criteria; age of participants; country of origin, sex; sample size; tumor stage; treatment plan; cut-off value for ALRI; selection of cut-off value; follow-up; and HR and 95% CI for ALRI. The HRs in this meta-analysis were derived from multivariate Cox analysis.The quality of all included studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) [25]. The NOS rating generally ranges from 0 to 9, and studies with a score >7 were regarded to be of high quality.


### 2.4. Statistical Analysis

In this meta-analysis, all statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 15.0 (STATACorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). The overall HRs and 95% CIs were calculated to determine the relationship between ALRI and OS or PFS in patients with HCC. Pooled ORs with 95% CIs were also calculated to investigate the correlation between ALRI and common clinical features of HCC. Cochran’sQ test combined with the I2 test was used to assess the statistical heterogeneity across the included studies, with significant heterogeneity viewed as I2>50%. A random-effect model was used for pooled data analysis when significant heterogeneity (i.e., I2>50%) was observed; otherwise, a fixed effect model was used. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the stability of the pooled ORs or HRs by sequentially excluding one study from the analysis. Begg’s test together with Egger’s test was used to explore for the presence of publication bias.


## 2.1. Search Strategy

This meta-analysis was prospectively enrolled in PROSPERO (ID:CRD42021238765, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/) and was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (i.e., PRISMA) statement [24]. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP databases were comprehensively searched from inception to November 20, 2021. Search terms included “liver cancer,” “liver neoplasm,” “hepatocellular carcinoma,” “HCC” AND “aspartate aminotransferase/lymphocyte,” “aspartate aminotransferase-to-lymphocyte ratio index,” “aspartate aminotransferase to lymphocyte ratio,” and “ALRI.” Additionally, the references of relevant studies were manually screened to identify additional potentially eligible studies. The included studies were restricted to those published in English and Chinese.


## 2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Study inclusion criteria were as follows: primary HCC was the only cancer diagnosis; age >18 years; individuals with HCC were classified into two groups based on an ALRI cut-off value; investigation of the association between ALRI and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with HCC; and reported hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for ALRI. Reviews, meta-analyses, letters, case reports, clinical studies without full text, or studies not reporting HR and 95% CI for ALRI were excluded.


## 2.3. Data Collection and Quality Evaluation

Two investigators (YH and MZ) independently reviewed the articles retrieved in the literature search and extracted the relevant data. Any disagreements were ultimately resolved by discussion with a third reviewer (RL). The following clinical information was extracted from the retrieved articles by LZ and YC: year of publication; author’s surname; study period; study design; staging criteria; age of participants; country of origin, sex; sample size; tumor stage; treatment plan; cut-off value for ALRI; selection of cut-off value; follow-up; and HR and 95% CI for ALRI. The HRs in this meta-analysis were derived from multivariate Cox analysis.The quality of all included studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) [25]. The NOS rating generally ranges from 0 to 9, and studies with a score >7 were regarded to be of high quality.


## 2.4. Statistical Analysis

In this meta-analysis, all statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 15.0 (STATACorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). The overall HRs and 95% CIs were calculated to determine the relationship between ALRI and OS or PFS in patients with HCC. Pooled ORs with 95% CIs were also calculated to investigate the correlation between ALRI and common clinical features of HCC. Cochran’sQ test combined with the I2 test was used to assess the statistical heterogeneity across the included studies, with significant heterogeneity viewed as I2>50%. A random-effect model was used for pooled data analysis when significant heterogeneity (i.e., I2>50%) was observed; otherwise, a fixed effect model was used. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the stability of the pooled ORs or HRs by sequentially excluding one study from the analysis. Begg’s test together with Egger’s test was used to explore for the presence of publication bias.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Study Characteristics

The primary literature search retrieved 81 articles. After removing duplicate publications and reviewing the abstracts, only eleven clinical studies [13–23] that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. The process of the literature selection is presented in Figure 1. The eleven clinical studies included retrospective cohorts and were published between 2015 and 2021. Sample sizes ranged from 78 to 983, with a total of 3914. Interestingly, all eleven studies were performed in China. Three clinical trials were published in the Chinese language [18–20] and the remainder in English. The cut-off value for ALRI ranged from 18.734 to 86, with a mean value of 33.96. All eleven clinical studies reported the association between ALRI and OS, and only seven studies [18–20, 22, 23] demonstrated a correlation between ALRI and PFS. Regarding quality evaluation, only two studies [13, 15] scored 7 and nine studies scored 8; as such, all studies were regarded to be of high quality (Table S1). Detailed clinical information of the nine included studies are summarized in Table 1.Figure 1
The flow diagram of literature selection.Table 1
Major features of eleven references included in this meta-analysis.
Author yearCountyStudy periodStudy designSample sizeAge (years)Sex (M/F)Staging criteriaHe (2017)China2007-2013Retrospective24150.3210 (87%)/31 (13%)Milan criteriaLiu (2020)China2011-2016Retrospective20653160 (78%)/46 (22%)AJCC 8thJin (2015)China1997-2008Retrospective371NA323 (87%)/48 (13%)NAYang (2015)China2009-2015Retrospective18953.4161 (85%)/28 (15%)BCLCZhao (2019)China2009-2013Retrospective42954392 (91%)/37 (9%)AJCC 7thZheng (2019)China2011-2013Retrospective7860.1267 (86%)/11 (14%)BCLCSuo (2019)China1993-2010Retrospective46350.14401 (87%)/62 (13%)BCLCQin (2019)China2013-2017Retrospective19148.62154 (81%)/37 (19%)AJCC 8thChen (2020)China2007-2016Retrospective98350.5829 (84%)/154 (16%)BCLCLiao (2021)China2009-2016Retrospective41650.47359 (86%)/57 (14%)NAWu (2021)China2014-2017Retrospective347NA290 (83.6%)/57 (16.4%)BCLC/AJCC8thAuthor yearTumor stageTreatmentCut-off valueCut-off selectionFollow-up monthsSurvival analysisNOS scoreHe (2017)Size <3; 3-5 cmSurgical resection32Mean value54.2OS, PFS7Liu (2020)I-IVSurgical resection18.734ROC analysis35OS8Jin (2015)I-IVSurgical resection25.2ROC analysis20OS, PFS7Yang (2015)A-CTACE57R software30.2∗OS8Zhao (2019)I-IVPalliative treatments86.3ROC analysisNAOS8Zheng (2019)B-CTACE22.82ROC analysis18.16∗OS, PFS8Suo (2019)0-CSurgical resection25.2ROC analysis47.12OS, PFS8Qin (2019)I-IIISurgical resection26.06ROC analysis32.4OS8Chen (2020)ASurgical resection26.6X-tile48.8OS, PFS8Liao (2021)I-IIISurgical resection22.6ROC analysis36.7O, PFS8Wu (2021)Size≤5; >5 cmSurgical resection31ROC analysis45OS, PFS8


### 3.2. Pooled Analysis of the Association between ALRI and OS

A total of 3914 patients with HCC from eleven retrospective cohorts were included in this meta-analysis. Because of notable study heterogeneity (I2=80.4% and P<0.0001), the random-effect model was selected for the combined meta-analysis. The combined results revealed that patients with HCC with elevated ALRI tended to have unfavorable OS (HR 1.53 [95% CI 1.25–1.82]; P<0.001]) (Figure 2(a)). Owing to the presence of significant heterogeneity in the meta-analysis, subgroup analyses were performed based on a list of common clinical factors. As shown in Table 2, significant correlations between ALRI and inferior OS persisted in the subgroup analyses of treatment, staging criteria, sample size, ALRI cut-off value, cut-off selection, and NOS score.Figure 2
Forest plots of the hazard ration evaluating the association between the ALRI and survival in liver cancer individuals. (a) Overall survival and (b) progression-free survival.
(a)(b)Table 2
Subgroup analysis of pooled HRs and 95% CIs between ALRI and OS and PFS in hepatocellular carcinoma.
VariablesNo. of studiesNo. of patientsEffects modelHR (95% CI)PHeterogeneityI2 (%)POSTotal113914Random1.53 (1.25-1.82)<0.00180.4<0.001TreatmentSurgical resection83218Random1.49 (1.17-1.81)<0.00182.7<0.001TACE2267Random2.20 (1.19-3.22)<0.00100.940Palliative treatments1429_0.004__Staging criteriaAJCC/NA61960Random1.60 (1.38-1.81)<0.00100.823BCLC52060Random1.56 (1.20-1.91)<0.00143.30.133Milan criteria1241_1.02 (1.01-1.02)<0.001__Sample size<2304664Random1.82 (1.29-2.34)<0.00100.701≥23073250Random1.45 (1.14-1.76)<0.00185.2<0.001Cut-off value of ALRI<2651534Random1.51 (1.21-1.80)<0.00131.40.212≥2662380Random1.54 (1.12-1.96)<0.00183.3<0.001Cut-off selectionROC analysis82501Random1.49 (1.31-1.68)<0.00100.441R software1189_2.18 (1.30-3.65)0.003__Mean value1241_1.02 (1.01-1.02)<0.001__X-tile1983_1.76 (1.42-2.17)<0.001NOS score<82612Random1.24 (0.73-1.76)<0.001840.012≥893302Random1.58 (1.37-1.78)<0.00116.30.298PFSTotal72899Random1.36 (1.10-1.63)<0.00181.8<0.001TreatmentSurgical resection62821Random1.35 (1.08-1.61)<0.00184<0.001TACE178_2.21 (1.04-4.71)0.040__Staging criteriaNA2787Random1.60 (1.31-1.89)<0.00100.521BCLC41871Random1.37 (1.18-1.55)<0.00100.651Milan criteria1241_1.01 (1.01-1.02)<0.001__Sample size<230178_2.21 (1.04-4.71)0.040__≥23062821Random1.35 (1.08-1.61)<0.00184<0.001Cut-off value of ALRI<2641328Random1.48 (1.21-1.74)<0.00118.70.297≥2631571Random1.24 (0.92-1.57)<0.00185.50.001Cut-off selectionROC analysis51675Random1.46 (1.26-1.66)<0.00100.448Mean value1241_1.01 (1.01-1.02)<0.001__X-tile1983_1.39 (1.17-1.65)<0.001__NOS score<82612Random1.22 (0.73-1.70)<0.00182.90.016≥851524Random1.42 (1.25-1.58)<0.00100.443F: female; M: male; NA: not available; TACE: transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; BCLC: Barcelona clinic hepatocellular carcinoma; AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer; NOS: Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival; ROC: receiver-operating characteristics curve. Age were presented as means; follow-up months were presented as median value, while “∗” was presented as means.


### 3.3. Pooled Analysis of the Correlation between ALRI and PFS

Seven studies including 2865 patients with HCC reported information addressing the relationship between ALRI and PFS. Because of the notable heterogeneity (I2=81.8% and P<0.0001), the random-effect model was selected for the combined meta-analysis. The overall results revealed a significant relationship between elevated ALRI and worse PFS among individuals with HCC (HR 1.53 [95% CI 1.25–1.82]; P<0.001]) (Figure 2(b)). As shown in Table 2, remarkable relationships between high ALRI and unfavorable PFS persisted in the subgroup analyses of treatment, staging criteria, sample size, ALRI cut-off value, cut-off selection, and NOS score.CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; NA: not available; TACE: transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; BCLC: Barcelona clinic hepatocellular carcinoma; AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer; NOS: Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival; ROC: receiver-operating characteristics curve.


### 3.4. Relationship between ALRI and Clinical Features

Based on the clinical characteristics reported in the eleven articles, the clinical significance of ALRI among patients with HCC was further analyzed. The overall OR and corresponding 95% CI were calculated using the STATA software to assess the associations between ALRI and selected clinical characteristics, including sex (male vs. female), age (>60 years vs. ≤60 years), hepatitis B surface antigen (positive vs. negative), alpha-fetoprotein level (>400 vs. ≤400 ng/mL), cirrhosis (yes vs. no), tumor size (≥5 cm vs. <5 cm), tumor number (multiple vs. single), TNM stage (III-IV vs. I-II), portal vein tumor thrombus (yes vs. no), and distant metastasis (yes vs. no). As shown in Table3, high ALRI was closely associated with male sex (OR 1.32 [95% CI 1.02–1.70]; P=0.035), presence of cirrhosis (OR 1.68 [95% CI 1.01–2.81]; P=0.046), larger tumor size (OR 2.25 [95% CI 1.31–3.88]; P<0.001), presence of portal vein tumor thrombus (OR 2.50 [95% CI 1.52–4.11]; P<0.001), and distant metastasis (OR 1.72 [95% CI 1.05–2.82]; P=0.031).Table 3
Correlations of ALRI and clinical factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
CharacteristicsNo. of studiesNo. of patientsEffects modelOR (95% CI)PHeterogeneityI2 (%)PSex, male vs. female61995Random1.32 (1.02-1.70)0.03500.613Age, years, >60 vs. ≤603475Random0.89 (0.56-1.43)0.63700.630HBsAg, positive vs. negative51566Random1.26 (0.95-1.67)0.10400.410AFP, ng/ml, >400 vs. ≤40041418Random1.45 (0.89-2.37)0.13671.90.014Cirrhosis, yes vs. no51566Random1.68 (1.01-2.81)0.046630.029Tumor size, ≥5 cm vs. <5 cm51566Random2.25 (1.31-3.88)0.00381<0.001Tumor number, multiple vs. single41360Random1.19 (0.87-1.64)0.27100.685TNM stage, III-IV vs. I-II41246Random1.94 (0.97-3.90)0.06287.6<0.001PVTT, yes vs. no41069Random2.50 (1.52-4.11)<0.00147.40.127Distant metastasis, yes vs.no3878Random1.72 (1.05-2.82)0.03100.472HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen; AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; TNM: tumor-node-metastasis; PVTT: portal vein tumor thrombus; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.


### 3.5. Sensitivity Analysis

To assess the robustness of the pooled HRs with 95% CI, a sensitivity analysis was performed by sequentially excluding one study at a time from the meta-analysis. The sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled relationship (i.e., HR) between ALRI and OS was not affected by the removal of any single study (Figure3(a)). In addition, the results of the sensitivity analyses implied that the overall results of PFS were not significantly altered by the removal of any single study (Figure 3(b)). In other words, results related to OS and PFS in the meta-analysis were robust.Figure 3
Sensitivity analyses of the impact of ALRI on the survival time among individuals with liver cancer. (a). Overall survival and (b) progression-free survival.
(a)(b)


### 3.6. Publication Bias

Begg’s and Egger’s tests were used to detect the presence of publication bias. As shown in the funnel plots (Figure4(a)), no significant publication bias (P=0.533) was observed related to the association between ALRI and OS in the current analysis. However, significant publication bias was noticed based on Egger’s test (P<0.05). Moreover, the funnel plot of association between ALRI and PFS showed an asymmetry of the result (Figure 4(b); Begg’s test P=0.548), and a significant publication bias was observed in Egger’s test (P=0.002).Figure 4
Funnel plots for the evaluation of publication bias. (a) Overall survival and (b) progression-free survival.
(a)(b)


## 3.1. Study Characteristics

The primary literature search retrieved 81 articles. After removing duplicate publications and reviewing the abstracts, only eleven clinical studies [13–23] that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. The process of the literature selection is presented in Figure 1. The eleven clinical studies included retrospective cohorts and were published between 2015 and 2021. Sample sizes ranged from 78 to 983, with a total of 3914. Interestingly, all eleven studies were performed in China. Three clinical trials were published in the Chinese language [18–20] and the remainder in English. The cut-off value for ALRI ranged from 18.734 to 86, with a mean value of 33.96. All eleven clinical studies reported the association between ALRI and OS, and only seven studies [18–20, 22, 23] demonstrated a correlation between ALRI and PFS. Regarding quality evaluation, only two studies [13, 15] scored 7 and nine studies scored 8; as such, all studies were regarded to be of high quality (Table S1). Detailed clinical information of the nine included studies are summarized in Table 1.Figure 1
The flow diagram of literature selection.Table 1
Major features of eleven references included in this meta-analysis.
Author yearCountyStudy periodStudy designSample sizeAge (years)Sex (M/F)Staging criteriaHe (2017)China2007-2013Retrospective24150.3210 (87%)/31 (13%)Milan criteriaLiu (2020)China2011-2016Retrospective20653160 (78%)/46 (22%)AJCC 8thJin (2015)China1997-2008Retrospective371NA323 (87%)/48 (13%)NAYang (2015)China2009-2015Retrospective18953.4161 (85%)/28 (15%)BCLCZhao (2019)China2009-2013Retrospective42954392 (91%)/37 (9%)AJCC 7thZheng (2019)China2011-2013Retrospective7860.1267 (86%)/11 (14%)BCLCSuo (2019)China1993-2010Retrospective46350.14401 (87%)/62 (13%)BCLCQin (2019)China2013-2017Retrospective19148.62154 (81%)/37 (19%)AJCC 8thChen (2020)China2007-2016Retrospective98350.5829 (84%)/154 (16%)BCLCLiao (2021)China2009-2016Retrospective41650.47359 (86%)/57 (14%)NAWu (2021)China2014-2017Retrospective347NA290 (83.6%)/57 (16.4%)BCLC/AJCC8thAuthor yearTumor stageTreatmentCut-off valueCut-off selectionFollow-up monthsSurvival analysisNOS scoreHe (2017)Size <3; 3-5 cmSurgical resection32Mean value54.2OS, PFS7Liu (2020)I-IVSurgical resection18.734ROC analysis35OS8Jin (2015)I-IVSurgical resection25.2ROC analysis20OS, PFS7Yang (2015)A-CTACE57R software30.2∗OS8Zhao (2019)I-IVPalliative treatments86.3ROC analysisNAOS8Zheng (2019)B-CTACE22.82ROC analysis18.16∗OS, PFS8Suo (2019)0-CSurgical resection25.2ROC analysis47.12OS, PFS8Qin (2019)I-IIISurgical resection26.06ROC analysis32.4OS8Chen (2020)ASurgical resection26.6X-tile48.8OS, PFS8Liao (2021)I-IIISurgical resection22.6ROC analysis36.7O, PFS8Wu (2021)Size≤5; >5 cmSurgical resection31ROC analysis45OS, PFS8


## 3.2. Pooled Analysis of the Association between ALRI and OS

A total of 3914 patients with HCC from eleven retrospective cohorts were included in this meta-analysis. Because of notable study heterogeneity (I2=80.4% and P<0.0001), the random-effect model was selected for the combined meta-analysis. The combined results revealed that patients with HCC with elevated ALRI tended to have unfavorable OS (HR 1.53 [95% CI 1.25–1.82]; P<0.001]) (Figure 2(a)). Owing to the presence of significant heterogeneity in the meta-analysis, subgroup analyses were performed based on a list of common clinical factors. As shown in Table 2, significant correlations between ALRI and inferior OS persisted in the subgroup analyses of treatment, staging criteria, sample size, ALRI cut-off value, cut-off selection, and NOS score.Figure 2
Forest plots of the hazard ration evaluating the association between the ALRI and survival in liver cancer individuals. (a) Overall survival and (b) progression-free survival.
(a)(b)Table 2
Subgroup analysis of pooled HRs and 95% CIs between ALRI and OS and PFS in hepatocellular carcinoma.
VariablesNo. of studiesNo. of patientsEffects modelHR (95% CI)PHeterogeneityI2 (%)POSTotal113914Random1.53 (1.25-1.82)<0.00180.4<0.001TreatmentSurgical resection83218Random1.49 (1.17-1.81)<0.00182.7<0.001TACE2267Random2.20 (1.19-3.22)<0.00100.940Palliative treatments1429_0.004__Staging criteriaAJCC/NA61960Random1.60 (1.38-1.81)<0.00100.823BCLC52060Random1.56 (1.20-1.91)<0.00143.30.133Milan criteria1241_1.02 (1.01-1.02)<0.001__Sample size<2304664Random1.82 (1.29-2.34)<0.00100.701≥23073250Random1.45 (1.14-1.76)<0.00185.2<0.001Cut-off value of ALRI<2651534Random1.51 (1.21-1.80)<0.00131.40.212≥2662380Random1.54 (1.12-1.96)<0.00183.3<0.001Cut-off selectionROC analysis82501Random1.49 (1.31-1.68)<0.00100.441R software1189_2.18 (1.30-3.65)0.003__Mean value1241_1.02 (1.01-1.02)<0.001__X-tile1983_1.76 (1.42-2.17)<0.001NOS score<82612Random1.24 (0.73-1.76)<0.001840.012≥893302Random1.58 (1.37-1.78)<0.00116.30.298PFSTotal72899Random1.36 (1.10-1.63)<0.00181.8<0.001TreatmentSurgical resection62821Random1.35 (1.08-1.61)<0.00184<0.001TACE178_2.21 (1.04-4.71)0.040__Staging criteriaNA2787Random1.60 (1.31-1.89)<0.00100.521BCLC41871Random1.37 (1.18-1.55)<0.00100.651Milan criteria1241_1.01 (1.01-1.02)<0.001__Sample size<230178_2.21 (1.04-4.71)0.040__≥23062821Random1.35 (1.08-1.61)<0.00184<0.001Cut-off value of ALRI<2641328Random1.48 (1.21-1.74)<0.00118.70.297≥2631571Random1.24 (0.92-1.57)<0.00185.50.001Cut-off selectionROC analysis51675Random1.46 (1.26-1.66)<0.00100.448Mean value1241_1.01 (1.01-1.02)<0.001__X-tile1983_1.39 (1.17-1.65)<0.001__NOS score<82612Random1.22 (0.73-1.70)<0.00182.90.016≥851524Random1.42 (1.25-1.58)<0.00100.443F: female; M: male; NA: not available; TACE: transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; BCLC: Barcelona clinic hepatocellular carcinoma; AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer; NOS: Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival; ROC: receiver-operating characteristics curve. Age were presented as means; follow-up months were presented as median value, while “∗” was presented as means.


## 3.3. Pooled Analysis of the Correlation between ALRI and PFS

Seven studies including 2865 patients with HCC reported information addressing the relationship between ALRI and PFS. Because of the notable heterogeneity (I2=81.8% and P<0.0001), the random-effect model was selected for the combined meta-analysis. The overall results revealed a significant relationship between elevated ALRI and worse PFS among individuals with HCC (HR 1.53 [95% CI 1.25–1.82]; P<0.001]) (Figure 2(b)). As shown in Table 2, remarkable relationships between high ALRI and unfavorable PFS persisted in the subgroup analyses of treatment, staging criteria, sample size, ALRI cut-off value, cut-off selection, and NOS score.CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; NA: not available; TACE: transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; BCLC: Barcelona clinic hepatocellular carcinoma; AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer; NOS: Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival; ROC: receiver-operating characteristics curve.


## 3.4. Relationship between ALRI and Clinical Features

Based on the clinical characteristics reported in the eleven articles, the clinical significance of ALRI among patients with HCC was further analyzed. The overall OR and corresponding 95% CI were calculated using the STATA software to assess the associations between ALRI and selected clinical characteristics, including sex (male vs. female), age (>60 years vs. ≤60 years), hepatitis B surface antigen (positive vs. negative), alpha-fetoprotein level (>400 vs. ≤400 ng/mL), cirrhosis (yes vs. no), tumor size (≥5 cm vs. <5 cm), tumor number (multiple vs. single), TNM stage (III-IV vs. I-II), portal vein tumor thrombus (yes vs. no), and distant metastasis (yes vs. no). As shown in Table3, high ALRI was closely associated with male sex (OR 1.32 [95% CI 1.02–1.70]; P=0.035), presence of cirrhosis (OR 1.68 [95% CI 1.01–2.81]; P=0.046), larger tumor size (OR 2.25 [95% CI 1.31–3.88]; P<0.001), presence of portal vein tumor thrombus (OR 2.50 [95% CI 1.52–4.11]; P<0.001), and distant metastasis (OR 1.72 [95% CI 1.05–2.82]; P=0.031).Table 3
Correlations of ALRI and clinical factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
CharacteristicsNo. of studiesNo. of patientsEffects modelOR (95% CI)PHeterogeneityI2 (%)PSex, male vs. female61995Random1.32 (1.02-1.70)0.03500.613Age, years, >60 vs. ≤603475Random0.89 (0.56-1.43)0.63700.630HBsAg, positive vs. negative51566Random1.26 (0.95-1.67)0.10400.410AFP, ng/ml, >400 vs. ≤40041418Random1.45 (0.89-2.37)0.13671.90.014Cirrhosis, yes vs. no51566Random1.68 (1.01-2.81)0.046630.029Tumor size, ≥5 cm vs. <5 cm51566Random2.25 (1.31-3.88)0.00381<0.001Tumor number, multiple vs. single41360Random1.19 (0.87-1.64)0.27100.685TNM stage, III-IV vs. I-II41246Random1.94 (0.97-3.90)0.06287.6<0.001PVTT, yes vs. no41069Random2.50 (1.52-4.11)<0.00147.40.127Distant metastasis, yes vs.no3878Random1.72 (1.05-2.82)0.03100.472HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen; AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; TNM: tumor-node-metastasis; PVTT: portal vein tumor thrombus; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.


## 3.5. Sensitivity Analysis

To assess the robustness of the pooled HRs with 95% CI, a sensitivity analysis was performed by sequentially excluding one study at a time from the meta-analysis. The sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled relationship (i.e., HR) between ALRI and OS was not affected by the removal of any single study (Figure3(a)). In addition, the results of the sensitivity analyses implied that the overall results of PFS were not significantly altered by the removal of any single study (Figure 3(b)). In other words, results related to OS and PFS in the meta-analysis were robust.Figure 3
Sensitivity analyses of the impact of ALRI on the survival time among individuals with liver cancer. (a). Overall survival and (b) progression-free survival.
(a)(b)


## 3.6. Publication Bias

Begg’s and Egger’s tests were used to detect the presence of publication bias. As shown in the funnel plots (Figure4(a)), no significant publication bias (P=0.533) was observed related to the association between ALRI and OS in the current analysis. However, significant publication bias was noticed based on Egger’s test (P<0.05). Moreover, the funnel plot of association between ALRI and PFS showed an asymmetry of the result (Figure 4(b); Begg’s test P=0.548), and a significant publication bias was observed in Egger’s test (P=0.002).Figure 4
Funnel plots for the evaluation of publication bias. (a) Overall survival and (b) progression-free survival.
(a)(b)


## 4. Discussion

Recently, an increasing number of serum markers, such as PNI, SII, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, have been used in the clinical practice owing to their ready availability and cost-effectiveness [26–28]. Among them, ALRI is a novel combined indicator, although its prognostic value and clinical significance in HCC remain uncertain. To our knowledge, the present meta-analysis was the first to determine the overall prognostic impact and clinical significance in HCC by aggregating available data from nine clinical studies.The results of our meta-analysis have some clinical implications. Based on the available data (N=3914), higher ALRI values were associated with inferior survival—for both OS and PFS—in patients with HCC. Our meta-analysis indicated that patients with HCC with increased ALRI had a higher risk for larger tumor size, presence of portal vein tumor thrombus, and distant metastasis, which would shorten survival time. Because of ready availability and low cost, ALRI could be routinely used to monitor disease progression in individuals with HCC. Our study was helpful for the oncologists in the risk assessment among patients with HCC based on ALRI and also helping them in designing and developing optimal treatment strategies. Individuals with HCC who have higher ALRI before treatment may benefit from radical treatments, such as postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and/or surgery, than those who have lower ALRI.Because AST is highly sensitive to damaged liver function, serum AST levels are commonly used to evaluate liver function [29]. Once hepatocytes are damaged/injured, intracellular AST is directly released into the peripheral blood, which leads to increased serum AST levels. Increased AST levels generally imply the activity of HBV in liver cancer patients infected with the virus, and the activity of HBV is a risk factor for decreased survival time in patients with HCC [30]. The close correlation between the pathogenesis of malignant tumor and systemic inflammation is quite common in patients with HCC because most result from chronic hepatitis [31]. Accumulating evidence has revealed that lymphocytes play a central role in the antitumor immune response [32, 33]. CD4+ T helper 1 cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes can kill HCC cells and effectively prevent oncogenesis and progression of HCC [34]. Hence, increased lymphocyte counts signify a relatively favorable prognosis in individuals with HCC. In summary, elevated serum AST levels are strongly associated with the progression of HCC, and a decrease in lymphocyte count reflects damage to antitumor immunity. Therefore, high ALRI suggests worse prognosis in individuals with HCC.The survival outcomes of HCC mainly depend on the prognostic biomarkers and staging systems, while it is not sufficient to assess the survival of patients with HCC by these criteria alone, as the survival outcome of HCC is not only affected by the tumor biology but also affected by the individuals’ liver function. So, ALRI seems to be a promising biomarker for patients with HCC. In addition to the prognostic relevance, ALRI also exhibited clinical relevance with significant clinical features, such as distant metastases, portal vein thrombosis, and tumor size greater than 5 cm.Our meta-analysis had four obvious limitations. First, all eleven included studies were retrospective trials, and no prospective trials were included. Second, all nine studies were performed in China, and the prognostic significance of ALRI in patients with HCC in other countries remains uncertain. Finally, the cut-off values for ALRI varied across the eleven included studies, and the calculation methods were also inconsistent. Lastly, as the original study did not report underlying liver disease (i.e., the presence of cirrhosis, HBV, HCV, or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis), we could not perform subgroup analysis based on this variable. Hence, an updated meta-analysis including more clinical studies from various areas is still needed in the future.In conclusion, high ALRI in patients with HCC predicted inferior survival outcomes and was strongly associated with some important features that imply tumor progression in HCC. However, more prospective clinical trials investigating the association between ALRI and survival among HCC patients from diverse ethnicities are necessary to verify this conclusion.



---

*Source: 3533714-2022-02-09.xml*