# Synthesis and Characterization of Well-Defined SolubleAlq3- and Znq2-Functionalized Polymers via RAFT Copolymerization

Authors: Chengchao Wang; Wei Zhang; Nianchen Zhou; Yansheng Qiu; Zhengping Cheng; Xiulin Zhu
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2010)

---

## Abstract

The reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) copolymerizations of 2-((8-hydroxyquinolin-5-yl)methoxy)ethyl methacrylate (HQHEMA) with styrene (St) or methyl methacrylate (MMA) were successfully carried out in the presence of 2-cyanoprop-2-yl dithionaphthalenoate (CPDN). The polymerization behaviors showed the typical living natures by the first-order polymerization kinetics, the linear dependence of molecular weights of the polymers on the monomer conversions with the relatively narrow molecular weight distributions(Mw/Mn), and the successful chain extension experiments. The soluble polymers having tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum (Alq3) and bis(8-hydroxyquinoline) znic(II) (Znq2) side chains were obtained via complexation of the polymers with aluminium isopropoxide or zinc acetate in the presence of monomeric 8-hydroxyquinoline, which had strong fluorescent emission at 520 nm. The obtained polymers were characterized by GPC, 1H NMR, UV-vis, and fluorescent spectra.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent years, organic electroluminescence (EL) display devices have attracted more intensive attention as a promising technology for flat panel display [1]. Many emitting materials, including low-weight molecules and polymers, have been designed and utilized in fabricating organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) [2–5]. Among them, metal 8-hydroxyquinoline (Mqn) chelates, especially for tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum (Alq3), and bis(8-hydroxyquinoline) znic(II) (Znq2) have been extensively investigated for their high stabilities, good emissions, and electron-transporting properties [6–8]. Compared with low-weight 8-hydroxyquinoline (Mqn) chelate, the polymers containing Mqn pendant groups combine the fluorescent property of Mqn and the processability of the polymer [6, 7, 9]. Up to now, two types of Mqn-containing polymers (main-chain type and side-chain type) have been reported. Yamamoto and Yamaquchi reported the synthesis of poly(quinolinol) [10] and poly(aryleneethynylene) [11] containing 8-quinolinol moieties. On the other hand, various side-chain type polymers including poly(arylene ether) [12], copolymers of 7-allyl-, or 7-(2-methylvinyl)-functionalized derivatives of 8-hydroquinoline with styrene [13], functionalized polystyrene [14], and copolymers of methacrylates having 8-hydroxyquinoline moieties were also successfully prepared [15]. Furthermore, Mqn-containing polymers were obtained by the reaction of the above polymers with metal compounds in the presence of monomeric 8-hydroxyquinoline. Meyers and Weck, reported the synthesis of an Alq3-functionalized polymer via ring-open metathesis polymerization of norbornene monomer containing Alq3 unit [6]. Most recently, Liang et al. reported the formation of Al3+ complex micelles via self-assembly of diblock copolymers containing pendent 8-hydroxyquinoline units [16]. However, the molecular weights and molecular weight distributions of the obtained polymers containing Mqn units were not well controlled in most cases.The development of controlled/“living” radical polymerization (CRP) methods, such as atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) [17–19], nitroxide-mediated radical polymerization (NMRP) [20], reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) [21] polymerization, and single-electron transfer mediated living radical polymerization (SET-LRP) [22] lead to unprecedented opportunities in design and synthesis of functional polymer materials. Among them, RAFT technique has been considered as one of the most advantageous techniques due to the mild reaction conditions, functional group compatibility, and versatility to monomers. Up to date, RAFT polymerization have been applied to a wide variety of monomers, including functionalized monomers, such as methyl methacrylate, styrene, methyl acrylate, acrylamide, 6-[4-(4-methoxyphenyl)phenoxy] hexyl methacrylate, and 3-[tris(trimethylsiloxy)silyl] propyl methacrylate [23]. However, the living radical polymerization of vinyl monomers containing 8-quinolinol moieties is rarely reported [16], although the common radical polymerization of vinyl monomers containing 8-quinolinol moieties have been successfully conducted [12–15].From these points of view, we investigated the feasibility of preparation of 8-hydroxyquinoline-containing soluble polymers via RAFT technique. Furthermore, the well-defined side-chain Mqn-containing (M= Al and Zn) polymers were also prepared via complexation of the polymers with aluminium isopropoxide and zinc acetate, respectively, and their optical properties were also investigated.


## 2. Experimental Part

### 2.1. Materials

Styrene (St) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) (chemically pure, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd) were purified by extracting with a 5% sodium hydroxide aqueous solution, followed by washing with water and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate overnight, finally distillated freshly before use.2,2′-Azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) (Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd, China, 99%) was recrystallized two times from ethanol. 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) (Alfa Aesar, 98%), 8-hydroxyquinoline (Alfa Aesar, 98%), aluminium isopropoxide (Alfa Aesar, 98%), sodium acetate (analytical reagent, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd), and zinc acetate (analytical reagent, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd) were used as received. Carbon disulphide (analytical reagent, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd), 1-bromonaphthalene (Alfa Aesar, 98%), and tetrahydrofuran (analytical reagent, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd) were dried by 4 Å molecular sieve before use. 2-Cyanoprop-2-yl 1-dithionaphthalate (CPDN) [24] and 2-((8-hydroxyquinolin-5-yl)methoxy)ethyl methacrylate (HQHEMA) [25] (Scheme 1) were synthesized according to the references, respectively. Unless otherwise specified, all other chemicals were purchased from Shanghai Chemical Reagents Co. Ltd and used as received without further purification.Scheme 1
The chemical structures of 2-((8-hydroxyquinolin-5-yl)methoxy)ethyl methacrylate (HQHEMA) and 2-cyanoprop-2-yl 1-dithionaphthalate (CPDN).


### 2.2. RAFT Copolymerization of HQHEMA with St or MMA

The typical procedures for the RAFT copolymerization are as follows: 2-((8-hydroxyquinolin-5-yl)methoxy)ethyl methacrylate (HQHEMA) (0.251 g, 0.873 mmol), styrene (St) (1 mL, 8.73 mmol), 2-cyanoprop-2-yl 1-dithionaphthalate (CPDN) (26.02 mg, 0.096 mmol) and2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) (1.57 mg, 0.0096 mmol), ([M]0/[CPDN]0/[AIBN]0= 1000 : 10 : 1, M= (HQHEMA + St), [St]0/[HQHEMA]0= 10 : 1) were added to a dry glass ampoule with a magnetic bar. The solution was bubbled with argon for approximately 10 minutes to eliminate the oxygen, and then the ampoule was flame-sealed under argon atmosphere and placed in the water bath at 70°C. At the designed time, the ampoule was opened, and the contents was diluted with about 2 mL THF, and precipitated into 250 mL methanol. The sample was obtained by filtration and dried to constant weight under vacuum. The conversion of the monomer was determined by gravimetry. The procedures of copolymerization of HQHEMA with MMA are similar to those described above.


### 2.3. Chain Extension Experiment with St or MA

The procedures of chain extension experiment are similar to those mentioned above except CPDN was substituted by poly(HQHEMA-co-St) or poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA) and the second monomer is St and methacrylate (MA), respectively.


### 2.4. Preparation of Alq3-Polymer Complex

To a 20 mL THF solution containing poly(HQHEMA-co-St) (Mn(GPC)=5400 g/mol, Mw/Mn=1.17, (St unit)/(HQHEMA unit) = 7 : 1 based on the 1H NMR spectrum) (4.32 g, 0.8 mmol) and 8-hydroxyquinoline (0.493 g, 3.4 mmol) was added dropwise a 10 mL THF solution of aluminium isopropoxide (0.265 g, 1.3 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 hour and at 50°C for another 17 hours. After being cooled to room temperature, the solution was poured into methanol. To remove any trace amounts of low molecular weight Alq3, the reprecipitation was repeated several times until the methanol solution was not colored anymore to yield the product as a light yellow solid (3.66 g, 85%). The similar procedures were used to prepare Znq2-polymer complex.


### 2.5. Characterization

1H NMR spectra of the polymers were recorded on an INOVA 400 MHz NMR instrument, using CDCl3 as solvent and TMS as the internal standard. The molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of the polymer was determined with a Waters 1515 gel permeation chromatography (GPC) equipped with refractive index detector, using HR1, HR3, and HR4 column with molecular weight range 100–500,000 calibrated with poly(methyl methacrylate) standard sample. UV-vis absorption spectra were performed on a Shimadzu UV-240 recording spectrophotometer at room temperature in CHCl3 solutions. The Fluorescence emission spectra were obtained on a PerkinElmer LS-50B Fluorescence spectrophotometer in CHCl3 at room temperature. The metal ion concentrations were determined by VISTA-MPX CCD Simultaneous ICP-AES, and the operation conditions are listed: plasma flow rate: 15 L min-1; carrier gas (Ar) flow rate: 1.5 L min-1; incident power (kW): 1.2 kW; vaporization press: 240 kPa.


## 2.1. Materials

Styrene (St) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) (chemically pure, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd) were purified by extracting with a 5% sodium hydroxide aqueous solution, followed by washing with water and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate overnight, finally distillated freshly before use.2,2′-Azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) (Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd, China, 99%) was recrystallized two times from ethanol. 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) (Alfa Aesar, 98%), 8-hydroxyquinoline (Alfa Aesar, 98%), aluminium isopropoxide (Alfa Aesar, 98%), sodium acetate (analytical reagent, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd), and zinc acetate (analytical reagent, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd) were used as received. Carbon disulphide (analytical reagent, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd), 1-bromonaphthalene (Alfa Aesar, 98%), and tetrahydrofuran (analytical reagent, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd) were dried by 4 Å molecular sieve before use. 2-Cyanoprop-2-yl 1-dithionaphthalate (CPDN) [24] and 2-((8-hydroxyquinolin-5-yl)methoxy)ethyl methacrylate (HQHEMA) [25] (Scheme 1) were synthesized according to the references, respectively. Unless otherwise specified, all other chemicals were purchased from Shanghai Chemical Reagents Co. Ltd and used as received without further purification.Scheme 1
The chemical structures of 2-((8-hydroxyquinolin-5-yl)methoxy)ethyl methacrylate (HQHEMA) and 2-cyanoprop-2-yl 1-dithionaphthalate (CPDN).


## 2.2. RAFT Copolymerization of HQHEMA with St or MMA

The typical procedures for the RAFT copolymerization are as follows: 2-((8-hydroxyquinolin-5-yl)methoxy)ethyl methacrylate (HQHEMA) (0.251 g, 0.873 mmol), styrene (St) (1 mL, 8.73 mmol), 2-cyanoprop-2-yl 1-dithionaphthalate (CPDN) (26.02 mg, 0.096 mmol) and2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) (1.57 mg, 0.0096 mmol), ([M]0/[CPDN]0/[AIBN]0= 1000 : 10 : 1, M= (HQHEMA + St), [St]0/[HQHEMA]0= 10 : 1) were added to a dry glass ampoule with a magnetic bar. The solution was bubbled with argon for approximately 10 minutes to eliminate the oxygen, and then the ampoule was flame-sealed under argon atmosphere and placed in the water bath at 70°C. At the designed time, the ampoule was opened, and the contents was diluted with about 2 mL THF, and precipitated into 250 mL methanol. The sample was obtained by filtration and dried to constant weight under vacuum. The conversion of the monomer was determined by gravimetry. The procedures of copolymerization of HQHEMA with MMA are similar to those described above.


## 2.3. Chain Extension Experiment with St or MA

The procedures of chain extension experiment are similar to those mentioned above except CPDN was substituted by poly(HQHEMA-co-St) or poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA) and the second monomer is St and methacrylate (MA), respectively.


## 2.4. Preparation of Alq3-Polymer Complex

To a 20 mL THF solution containing poly(HQHEMA-co-St) (Mn(GPC)=5400 g/mol, Mw/Mn=1.17, (St unit)/(HQHEMA unit) = 7 : 1 based on the 1H NMR spectrum) (4.32 g, 0.8 mmol) and 8-hydroxyquinoline (0.493 g, 3.4 mmol) was added dropwise a 10 mL THF solution of aluminium isopropoxide (0.265 g, 1.3 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 hour and at 50°C for another 17 hours. After being cooled to room temperature, the solution was poured into methanol. To remove any trace amounts of low molecular weight Alq3, the reprecipitation was repeated several times until the methanol solution was not colored anymore to yield the product as a light yellow solid (3.66 g, 85%). The similar procedures were used to prepare Znq2-polymer complex.


## 2.5. Characterization

1H NMR spectra of the polymers were recorded on an INOVA 400 MHz NMR instrument, using CDCl3 as solvent and TMS as the internal standard. The molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of the polymer was determined with a Waters 1515 gel permeation chromatography (GPC) equipped with refractive index detector, using HR1, HR3, and HR4 column with molecular weight range 100–500,000 calibrated with poly(methyl methacrylate) standard sample. UV-vis absorption spectra were performed on a Shimadzu UV-240 recording spectrophotometer at room temperature in CHCl3 solutions. The Fluorescence emission spectra were obtained on a PerkinElmer LS-50B Fluorescence spectrophotometer in CHCl3 at room temperature. The metal ion concentrations were determined by VISTA-MPX CCD Simultaneous ICP-AES, and the operation conditions are listed: plasma flow rate: 15 L min-1; carrier gas (Ar) flow rate: 1.5 L min-1; incident power (kW): 1.2 kW; vaporization press: 240 kPa.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. RAFT Copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA

The monomer containing 8-hydroxyquinoline moiety, 2-((8-hydroxyquinolin-5-yl)methoxy)ethyl methacrylate (HQHEMA) was often used to prepare side-chain Mqn-containing (M= Al or Zn) polymers. However, the Mqn-containing PHQHEMA was also difficult to be dissolved in common organic solvents. Takayama et al. [9] increased the solubility of the polymer via introducing alkyl side chain in 7-position of 8-hydroxyquinoline unit. We aimed to increase the processability of Mqn-containing polymer by copolymerization of HQHEMA with other vinyl monomers. Firstly, we conducted atom transfer radical copolymerization (ATRP) of HQHEMA with St or MMA, however, no polymer was obtained, which may be due to the coordination between 8-hydroxyquinoline and catalyst (CuBr/Ligand) used in ATRP and resulted in the catalyst ineffective [16]. RAFT copolymerizations of HQHEMA with MMA or St were successfully carried out in the presence of 2-cyanoprop-2-yl 1-dithionaphthalate (CPDN). The results are presented in Figures 1–4 and Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Figure 1 illustrates the kinetic plot for the copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA. The linear relationship between ln([M]0/[M]) and the reaction time can be observed, which indicated that the polymerization was first-order with respect to the monomer, and the radical concentration remained constant throughout the polymerization process. Figure 2 presents the dependence of the molecular weight and molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn) on the monomer conversion for the RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA. The molecular weight of poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA) measured by GPC (Mn(GPC)) increased linearly with the monomer conversion while keeping the relatively narrow molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn≤1.63). The influence of the molar ratio of [CPDN]0/[AIBN]0 on the polymerization was also investigated. As shown in Table 1, the polymerization rate obviously decreased with increasing the initial concentration of CPDN in the polymerization system, which was agreed well with the RAFT polymerization mechanism [26].Table 1
RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA with different CPDN concentrations.
([MMA]0 : [HQHEMA]0) : [CPDN]0: [AIBN]0tT(°C)Conversion(%)Mn(GPC)g/molMw/Mn1000(10 : 1) : 10 : 137045.955001.221000(10 : 1) : 5 : 137072.0115001.521000(10 : 1) : 3 : 137099.1191001.27Table 2
RAFT copolymerization of St and HQHEMA with different CPDN concentrations.
([St]0 : [HQHEMA]0) : [CPDN]0 : [AIBN]0t (h)T (°C)Conversion (%)Mn(GPC)Mw/Mn1000(10 : 1) : 10 : 1127040.844001.261000(10 : 1) : 5 : 1127066.378001.201000(10 : 1) : 3 : 1127071.1101001.18Figure 1
ln([M0]/[M]) and monomer conversion versus polymerization time. Kinetic plot of RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA. Polymerization conditions: [Monomer]0/[CPDN]0/[AIBN]0= 1000 : 10 : 1, [Monomer]0= [MMA]0/[HQHEMA]0= 10 : 1; T=70°C.Figure 2
Dependence of molecule weights and molecule weight distributions on monomer conversions for RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA. Polymerization conditions are the same as in Figure1.Figure 3
ln([M]0/[M]) and monomer conversion versus polymerization time. Kinetic plot of RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and St. Polymerization conditions: [Monomer]0/[CPDN]0/[AIBN]0= 1000 : 10 : 1, [Monomer]0= [St]0/[HQHEMA]0= 10 : 1; T=70°C.Figure 4
Dependence of molecule weights and molecule weight distributions on monomer conversions for RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and St. Polymerization condition are the same as in Figure3.


### 3.2. RAFT Copolymerization of HQHEMA and St

The copolymerization of HQHEMA and St mediated by CPDN was also conducted and the results are given in Figure3, Figure 4, and Table 2. Figure 3 shows the kinetic plot of ln([M0]/[M]) versus polymerization time. The resulting slope indicates this copolymerization proceeded with approximately constant number of active species for the duration of the reaction. Figure 4 presents the molecular weight measured by GPC (Mn(GPC)) and molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn) of poly(HQHEMA-co-St) as a function of monomer conversion. Both the linear Mn(GPC) versus monomer conversion plot and the corresponding narrow molecular weight distribution imply the living nature of RAFT copolymerization. As expected, increasing the RAFT agent concentration (CPDN) decreased the polymerization rate as presented in Table 2 (entries 1–3).


### 3.3. Characterization of Copolymers and Chain Extension Experiment

The obtained copolymers were characterized by1H NMR spectra as shown in Figures 5 and 6. In Figure 5, the signal δ=3.70ppm (a) was attributed to the methyl protons of the MMA units, and the signals δ= 7.10 ppm (e), 7.44 ppm (e), 7.53 ppm (e), 8.54 ppm (e), and 8.83 ppm (3) demonstrate the existence of HQHEMA units, which confirmed that HQHEMA and MMA units were contained in the polymer chain. Based on Figure 5, we also can calculate that the ratio of HQHEMA unit to MMA unit is near 5 : 1 in the copolymer chain. In Figure 6, the signal δ=6.40-7.10 ppm (b) of protons of phenyl ring and the signals δ= 7.53 ppm (e), 8.54 ppm (e), and 8.83 ppm (e) of protons of 8-hydroxyquinoline units indicate the polymer chain contains HQHEMA and St units. The near 7 : 1 ratio of HQHEMA to St unit is also calculated based on Figure 6. To further prove the “living” nature of RAFT polymerization, the obtained copolymers, poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA), and poly(HQHEMA-co-St) were both used as macro-RAFT agents to conduct chain extension reactions with St and MA as the second monomers, respectively. GPC curves for the block copolymers are shown in Figure 7. It can be seen from Figure 7 that the peaks shift to higher molecular weights from macro-RAFT agent to the chain-extended block copolymers. The molecular weights increased from 7800 g/mol (Mw/Mn=1.37) to 15400 g/mol (Mw/Mn=1.37, 68.6% conversion) with poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA) as the macro-RAFT agent and St as the second monomer, and from 5400 g/mol (Mw/Mn=1.17) to 14600 g/mol (Mw/Mn=1.48, 79.3% conversion) with poly(HQHEMA-co-St) as the macro-RAFT agent and MA as the second monomer. These results reveal that almost all the macro-RAFT agents participate in the block copolymerization of MA or St, and block copolymers poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA)-b-PS and poly(HQHEMA-co-St)-b-PMA) are formed in a controlled manner.Figure 5
The1H NMR spectrum of random copolymer of HQHEMA and MMA (poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA)) in CDCl3.Figure 6
The1H NMR spectrum of random copolymer of HQHEMA and St (poly(HQHEMA-co-St)) in CDCl3.Figure 7
GPC curves of macro-RAFT agent (poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA) and poly(HQHEMA-co-St)) and polymers after chain-extension. Chain-extended experiment conditions: [St]0 : [poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA)]0: [AIBN]0= 500 : 5 : 1, t=24 hour, T=70°C, conversion(%) = 68.6%; [MA]0 : [poly(HQHEMA-co-St)]0 : [AIBN]0= 500 : 5 : 1, t=3 hour, T=80°C, conversion(%) = 75.3%. Poly(HQHEMA-co-St) (-), poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA) (-), poly(HQHEMA-co-St)-b-PMA (-), poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA)-b-PS (-).


### 3.4. Synthesis of Alq3 and Znq2-Containing Copolymer

Formation of Alq3-containing copolymers was performed in THF using poly(HQHEMA-co-St) (8-hydroxyquinoline unit/St unit = 1 : 7), 8-hydroxyquinoline and aluminium isopropoxide in a ratio of 8 : 8 : 3. The use of excess 8-hydroxyquinoline and aluminium isopropoxide was adopted in order to minimize the formation of interchain cross-linked complexs. The obtained polymer complex was soluble in several common organic solvents, such as chloroform (CHCl3), tetrahydrofuran (THF), and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). The Formation of Znq2-containing copolymers was also successfully obtained via the similar procedures. As shown in Figure 8, the color of the polymer complex (solid and CHCl3 solution) turned from slightly red to yellow, which demonstrated the successful coordination reaction between metal ion (Al3+ and Zn2+) and 8-hydroxyquinoline units. The metal (Al and Zn) ion concentrations of final samples were also determined by VISTA-MPX CCD Simultaneous ICP-AES, and the results are 6.5 × 10-6 mol/L for Al3+ and 9.5 × 10-6 mol/L for Zn2+, respectively. The above results demonstrated that the metal ions (Al3+ and Zn2+) molar ratios to 8-hydroxyquinoline unit are both close to 1 : 3 and 1 : 2, respectively, which demonstrated that almost all 8-hydroxyquinoline units in the copolymer chains were successfully complexed to form Alq3 and Znq2 in the side chain.The images of poly(HQHEMA-co-St) and the corresponding Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers in solid and solution, respectively. (a) poly(HQHEMA-co-St); (b) Znq2-containing poly(HQHEMA-co-St); (c) Alq3-containing poly(HQHEMA-co-St). The concentration of 8-hydroxyquinoline moieties is 2.0 × 10-5M for all the solutions.
(a)(b)(c)UV-vis and fluorescent spectra of the Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers were investigated as shown in Figures 9 and 10. In Figure 9, the Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers had the absorption in the range of 300 nm and 450 nm, which were the typical UV-vis absorption of Alq3- and Znq2 complexs. Figure 10 presented the fluorescent spectra of Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers with an excitation wavelength of 380 nm. As expected, the Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers had strong emission at around 520 nm. These studies clearly show that the optical properties of Alq3 and Znq2 are preserved in the copolymers, respectively.Figure 9
The UV-vis absorption spectra of Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers in CHCl3. The concentration of 8-hydroxyquinoline moieties is 2.0 × 10-5M.Figure 10
The fluorescence spectra of Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers in CHCl3. The concentration of 8-hydroxyquinoline moieties is 2.0 × 10-5M and excitation wavelength is 380 nm.


## 3.1. RAFT Copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA

The monomer containing 8-hydroxyquinoline moiety, 2-((8-hydroxyquinolin-5-yl)methoxy)ethyl methacrylate (HQHEMA) was often used to prepare side-chain Mqn-containing (M= Al or Zn) polymers. However, the Mqn-containing PHQHEMA was also difficult to be dissolved in common organic solvents. Takayama et al. [9] increased the solubility of the polymer via introducing alkyl side chain in 7-position of 8-hydroxyquinoline unit. We aimed to increase the processability of Mqn-containing polymer by copolymerization of HQHEMA with other vinyl monomers. Firstly, we conducted atom transfer radical copolymerization (ATRP) of HQHEMA with St or MMA, however, no polymer was obtained, which may be due to the coordination between 8-hydroxyquinoline and catalyst (CuBr/Ligand) used in ATRP and resulted in the catalyst ineffective [16]. RAFT copolymerizations of HQHEMA with MMA or St were successfully carried out in the presence of 2-cyanoprop-2-yl 1-dithionaphthalate (CPDN). The results are presented in Figures 1–4 and Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Figure 1 illustrates the kinetic plot for the copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA. The linear relationship between ln([M]0/[M]) and the reaction time can be observed, which indicated that the polymerization was first-order with respect to the monomer, and the radical concentration remained constant throughout the polymerization process. Figure 2 presents the dependence of the molecular weight and molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn) on the monomer conversion for the RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA. The molecular weight of poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA) measured by GPC (Mn(GPC)) increased linearly with the monomer conversion while keeping the relatively narrow molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn≤1.63). The influence of the molar ratio of [CPDN]0/[AIBN]0 on the polymerization was also investigated. As shown in Table 1, the polymerization rate obviously decreased with increasing the initial concentration of CPDN in the polymerization system, which was agreed well with the RAFT polymerization mechanism [26].Table 1
RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA with different CPDN concentrations.
([MMA]0 : [HQHEMA]0) : [CPDN]0: [AIBN]0tT(°C)Conversion(%)Mn(GPC)g/molMw/Mn1000(10 : 1) : 10 : 137045.955001.221000(10 : 1) : 5 : 137072.0115001.521000(10 : 1) : 3 : 137099.1191001.27Table 2
RAFT copolymerization of St and HQHEMA with different CPDN concentrations.
([St]0 : [HQHEMA]0) : [CPDN]0 : [AIBN]0t (h)T (°C)Conversion (%)Mn(GPC)Mw/Mn1000(10 : 1) : 10 : 1127040.844001.261000(10 : 1) : 5 : 1127066.378001.201000(10 : 1) : 3 : 1127071.1101001.18Figure 1
ln([M0]/[M]) and monomer conversion versus polymerization time. Kinetic plot of RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA. Polymerization conditions: [Monomer]0/[CPDN]0/[AIBN]0= 1000 : 10 : 1, [Monomer]0= [MMA]0/[HQHEMA]0= 10 : 1; T=70°C.Figure 2
Dependence of molecule weights and molecule weight distributions on monomer conversions for RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA. Polymerization conditions are the same as in Figure1.Figure 3
ln([M]0/[M]) and monomer conversion versus polymerization time. Kinetic plot of RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and St. Polymerization conditions: [Monomer]0/[CPDN]0/[AIBN]0= 1000 : 10 : 1, [Monomer]0= [St]0/[HQHEMA]0= 10 : 1; T=70°C.Figure 4
Dependence of molecule weights and molecule weight distributions on monomer conversions for RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and St. Polymerization condition are the same as in Figure3.


## 3.2. RAFT Copolymerization of HQHEMA and St

The copolymerization of HQHEMA and St mediated by CPDN was also conducted and the results are given in Figure3, Figure 4, and Table 2. Figure 3 shows the kinetic plot of ln([M0]/[M]) versus polymerization time. The resulting slope indicates this copolymerization proceeded with approximately constant number of active species for the duration of the reaction. Figure 4 presents the molecular weight measured by GPC (Mn(GPC)) and molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn) of poly(HQHEMA-co-St) as a function of monomer conversion. Both the linear Mn(GPC) versus monomer conversion plot and the corresponding narrow molecular weight distribution imply the living nature of RAFT copolymerization. As expected, increasing the RAFT agent concentration (CPDN) decreased the polymerization rate as presented in Table 2 (entries 1–3).


## 3.3. Characterization of Copolymers and Chain Extension Experiment

The obtained copolymers were characterized by1H NMR spectra as shown in Figures 5 and 6. In Figure 5, the signal δ=3.70ppm (a) was attributed to the methyl protons of the MMA units, and the signals δ= 7.10 ppm (e), 7.44 ppm (e), 7.53 ppm (e), 8.54 ppm (e), and 8.83 ppm (3) demonstrate the existence of HQHEMA units, which confirmed that HQHEMA and MMA units were contained in the polymer chain. Based on Figure 5, we also can calculate that the ratio of HQHEMA unit to MMA unit is near 5 : 1 in the copolymer chain. In Figure 6, the signal δ=6.40-7.10 ppm (b) of protons of phenyl ring and the signals δ= 7.53 ppm (e), 8.54 ppm (e), and 8.83 ppm (e) of protons of 8-hydroxyquinoline units indicate the polymer chain contains HQHEMA and St units. The near 7 : 1 ratio of HQHEMA to St unit is also calculated based on Figure 6. To further prove the “living” nature of RAFT polymerization, the obtained copolymers, poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA), and poly(HQHEMA-co-St) were both used as macro-RAFT agents to conduct chain extension reactions with St and MA as the second monomers, respectively. GPC curves for the block copolymers are shown in Figure 7. It can be seen from Figure 7 that the peaks shift to higher molecular weights from macro-RAFT agent to the chain-extended block copolymers. The molecular weights increased from 7800 g/mol (Mw/Mn=1.37) to 15400 g/mol (Mw/Mn=1.37, 68.6% conversion) with poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA) as the macro-RAFT agent and St as the second monomer, and from 5400 g/mol (Mw/Mn=1.17) to 14600 g/mol (Mw/Mn=1.48, 79.3% conversion) with poly(HQHEMA-co-St) as the macro-RAFT agent and MA as the second monomer. These results reveal that almost all the macro-RAFT agents participate in the block copolymerization of MA or St, and block copolymers poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA)-b-PS and poly(HQHEMA-co-St)-b-PMA) are formed in a controlled manner.Figure 5
The1H NMR spectrum of random copolymer of HQHEMA and MMA (poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA)) in CDCl3.Figure 6
The1H NMR spectrum of random copolymer of HQHEMA and St (poly(HQHEMA-co-St)) in CDCl3.Figure 7
GPC curves of macro-RAFT agent (poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA) and poly(HQHEMA-co-St)) and polymers after chain-extension. Chain-extended experiment conditions: [St]0 : [poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA)]0: [AIBN]0= 500 : 5 : 1, t=24 hour, T=70°C, conversion(%) = 68.6%; [MA]0 : [poly(HQHEMA-co-St)]0 : [AIBN]0= 500 : 5 : 1, t=3 hour, T=80°C, conversion(%) = 75.3%. Poly(HQHEMA-co-St) (-), poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA) (-), poly(HQHEMA-co-St)-b-PMA (-), poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA)-b-PS (-).


## 3.4. Synthesis of Alq3 and Znq2-Containing Copolymer

Formation of Alq3-containing copolymers was performed in THF using poly(HQHEMA-co-St) (8-hydroxyquinoline unit/St unit = 1 : 7), 8-hydroxyquinoline and aluminium isopropoxide in a ratio of 8 : 8 : 3. The use of excess 8-hydroxyquinoline and aluminium isopropoxide was adopted in order to minimize the formation of interchain cross-linked complexs. The obtained polymer complex was soluble in several common organic solvents, such as chloroform (CHCl3), tetrahydrofuran (THF), and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). The Formation of Znq2-containing copolymers was also successfully obtained via the similar procedures. As shown in Figure 8, the color of the polymer complex (solid and CHCl3 solution) turned from slightly red to yellow, which demonstrated the successful coordination reaction between metal ion (Al3+ and Zn2+) and 8-hydroxyquinoline units. The metal (Al and Zn) ion concentrations of final samples were also determined by VISTA-MPX CCD Simultaneous ICP-AES, and the results are 6.5 × 10-6 mol/L for Al3+ and 9.5 × 10-6 mol/L for Zn2+, respectively. The above results demonstrated that the metal ions (Al3+ and Zn2+) molar ratios to 8-hydroxyquinoline unit are both close to 1 : 3 and 1 : 2, respectively, which demonstrated that almost all 8-hydroxyquinoline units in the copolymer chains were successfully complexed to form Alq3 and Znq2 in the side chain.The images of poly(HQHEMA-co-St) and the corresponding Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers in solid and solution, respectively. (a) poly(HQHEMA-co-St); (b) Znq2-containing poly(HQHEMA-co-St); (c) Alq3-containing poly(HQHEMA-co-St). The concentration of 8-hydroxyquinoline moieties is 2.0 × 10-5M for all the solutions.
(a)(b)(c)UV-vis and fluorescent spectra of the Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers were investigated as shown in Figures 9 and 10. In Figure 9, the Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers had the absorption in the range of 300 nm and 450 nm, which were the typical UV-vis absorption of Alq3- and Znq2 complexs. Figure 10 presented the fluorescent spectra of Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers with an excitation wavelength of 380 nm. As expected, the Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers had strong emission at around 520 nm. These studies clearly show that the optical properties of Alq3 and Znq2 are preserved in the copolymers, respectively.Figure 9
The UV-vis absorption spectra of Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers in CHCl3. The concentration of 8-hydroxyquinoline moieties is 2.0 × 10-5M.Figure 10
The fluorescence spectra of Alq3- and Znq2-containing copolymers in CHCl3. The concentration of 8-hydroxyquinoline moieties is 2.0 × 10-5M and excitation wavelength is 380 nm.


## 4. Conclusion

The well-defined poly(HQHEMA-co-MMA) and poly(HQHEMA-co-St) were successfully prepared via RAFT copolymerization of HQHEMA and MMA (or St) mediated by a typical RAFT agent (CPDN). The soluble copolymers having Alq3 and Znq2 side chains were obtained via complexation of the polymers with aluminium isopropoxide and zinc acetate in the presence of monomeric 8-hydroxyquinoline, respectively, which had typical UV-vis absorption in the range from 300 nm to 450 nm and strong fluorescent emission at 520 nm.



---

*Source: 340926-2010-05-05.xml*