# Morbid Parasitological and Histopathological Events in Hamsters Infected with Intestinal Amoebiasis Given Artesunate

Authors: Soheir Mahmoud; Nevine Guirguis Nessim
Journal: Scholarly Research Exchange
 (2008)

---

## Abstract

Objectives. This work is a trial to elucidate the parasitological and histopathological sequelae of giving the antimalarial drug (artesunate) in experimental intestinal amoebiasis. Methods. A group of 24  hamsters was infected by Entamoeba histolytica cysts orally using a canula. This group was subdivided into two main subgroups. Subgroup I: given 6000 E. histolytica cysts orally by a canula, then sacrificed five weeks postinfection. Subgroup II : given the same infective dose, then two weeks later, treated with artesunate 10 mgm/Kg b. wt/hamster over 3 consecutive days. Again sacrifice was performed five weeks postinfection. Multiple stool examinations, and histopathological examination of the caecal end of the large intestine were resorted to, in order to assess the antiamoebic effect of the drug. Faecal smear examination revealed absolute disappearance of E. histolytica cysts in the treated group. Again, histopathology of the mucosal scrapings of the caecum showed complete absence of Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites in the treated group, when compared to the control animals (P<.001). This study may be beneficial, especially in areas endemic with amoebiasis to help overcoming the emerging resistance to the usually available antiamoebic drugs.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Fernández et al. [1] postulated  that the aqueous, methanol,
acetone, and hexane leaf extracts from mature Artemisia plants  were found to be active in vitro against the parasitic  protozoa Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia.Amoebiasis is a protozoal disease which is widespread primarily in developping countries.
Infections are correlated with poor hygienic conditions, poor water quality control, and overcrowding. Other risk factors include young age, poor personnal hygiene, risky social behaviour, malnutition, and hypochlorhydria [2].The goldstandard of this study is to evaluate both the parasitological and the pathological effects of the antimalarial drug, artesunate in experimental intestinal amoebiasis.


## 2. Material and Methods

A group of fifteen golden Syrian hamsters (weighing 100 gm each) was used in the experiment. This group was further subdivided into two small subgroups. Subgroup I: constituted control infected untreated hamsters. Infection was done by oral administration of  6000Entamoeba histolytica cysts through an
oesophageal tube. Subgroup II: constituted infected animals, treated three weeks later with three consecutive oral doses of 10 mg artesunate/Kg b. wt over three successive days. Animals were kept on a standard diet, under 24°C for three weeks in the Biological Unit at TBRI. Treatment was initiated three weeks
postinfection. The drug was supplied by Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt. The manufacturer is  Erfa. The experiment was carried according to the internationally valid guidelines in the Theodor Biharz Research institute. All animals were sacrificed five weeks postinfection and two weeks posttreatment.


### 2.1. Stool Parasitology

#### 2.1.1. Direct Smear Method

A stool sample from each infected hamster was examined
by direct smear method in order to confirm the infection [3]. A wet mount with saline and Lugol’s iodine (Dobell reactive) was prepared, and microscopic examination for motile trophozoites and Entamoeba cysts was carried out using the low and high power (×   200 and ×   400).


#### 2.1.2. Concentration Method MIFC

Faecal samples were collected from hamsters in clean small Petri
dishes. The samples were microscopically examined by merthiolate iodine
formaldehyde concentration (MIFC) method  [4]. From each sample, about
one gram was taken and emulsified in a tube containing five mL of merthiolate
iodine formaldehyde (MIF) solution. The mixture was strained through household
tea sieves into a 15-mL centrifuge tube. Seven mL of cold ether (kept in
refrigerator at 4°C) were
added to the top centrifuge tube. Stopper was inserted, and the tube was
shacked vigorously (in case that ether remains on top after shacking, 1mL tap
water was added and the tube shacked again). The stopper was removed, and the
tube was allowed to stand for 2 minutes. The tube was centrifuged for 5 minutes
at 3500 g (gravity). After centrifugation, 4 layers appeared in the tube: an
ether layer on top, a plug of fecal detritus, an MIF layer, then the sediment,
which contains Entamoeba cysts. All layers were poured off except the bottom
layer of the sediment. The sediment was mixed; a drop was put on a slide,
covered and examined microscopically.


### 2.2. Histopathological Studies

After sacrifice of the animals,  sections from the caecal end of the large
intestine were taken, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned. Five sections (5
microns in thickness) were taken from each large intestine specimen, each
section being at a distance of at least 500μm from the preceding one. Sections were stained
with haematoxylin and eosin [5]. In addition, examination
of inflammatory infiltrate particularly of plasmacellular type was done.


## 2.1. Stool Parasitology

### 2.1.1. Direct Smear Method

A stool sample from each infected hamster was examined
by direct smear method in order to confirm the infection [3]. A wet mount with saline and Lugol’s iodine (Dobell reactive) was prepared, and microscopic examination for motile trophozoites and Entamoeba cysts was carried out using the low and high power (×   200 and ×   400).


### 2.1.2. Concentration Method MIFC

Faecal samples were collected from hamsters in clean small Petri
dishes. The samples were microscopically examined by merthiolate iodine
formaldehyde concentration (MIFC) method  [4]. From each sample, about
one gram was taken and emulsified in a tube containing five mL of merthiolate
iodine formaldehyde (MIF) solution. The mixture was strained through household
tea sieves into a 15-mL centrifuge tube. Seven mL of cold ether (kept in
refrigerator at 4°C) were
added to the top centrifuge tube. Stopper was inserted, and the tube was
shacked vigorously (in case that ether remains on top after shacking, 1mL tap
water was added and the tube shacked again). The stopper was removed, and the
tube was allowed to stand for 2 minutes. The tube was centrifuged for 5 minutes
at 3500 g (gravity). After centrifugation, 4 layers appeared in the tube: an
ether layer on top, a plug of fecal detritus, an MIF layer, then the sediment,
which contains Entamoeba cysts. All layers were poured off except the bottom
layer of the sediment. The sediment was mixed; a drop was put on a slide,
covered and examined microscopically.


## 2.1.1. Direct Smear Method

A stool sample from each infected hamster was examined
by direct smear method in order to confirm the infection [3]. A wet mount with saline and Lugol’s iodine (Dobell reactive) was prepared, and microscopic examination for motile trophozoites and Entamoeba cysts was carried out using the low and high power (×   200 and ×   400).


## 2.1.2. Concentration Method MIFC

Faecal samples were collected from hamsters in clean small Petri
dishes. The samples were microscopically examined by merthiolate iodine
formaldehyde concentration (MIFC) method  [4]. From each sample, about
one gram was taken and emulsified in a tube containing five mL of merthiolate
iodine formaldehyde (MIF) solution. The mixture was strained through household
tea sieves into a 15-mL centrifuge tube. Seven mL of cold ether (kept in
refrigerator at 4°C) were
added to the top centrifuge tube. Stopper was inserted, and the tube was
shacked vigorously (in case that ether remains on top after shacking, 1mL tap
water was added and the tube shacked again). The stopper was removed, and the
tube was allowed to stand for 2 minutes. The tube was centrifuged for 5 minutes
at 3500 g (gravity). After centrifugation, 4 layers appeared in the tube: an
ether layer on top, a plug of fecal detritus, an MIF layer, then the sediment,
which contains Entamoeba cysts. All layers were poured off except the bottom
layer of the sediment. The sediment was mixed; a drop was put on a slide,
covered and examined microscopically.


## 2.2. Histopathological Studies

After sacrifice of the animals,  sections from the caecal end of the large
intestine were taken, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned. Five sections (5
microns in thickness) were taken from each large intestine specimen, each
section being at a distance of at least 500μm from the preceding one. Sections were stained
with haematoxylin and eosin [5]. In addition, examination
of inflammatory infiltrate particularly of plasmacellular type was done.


## 3. Statistics

Comparison was done between each treated group and its respective
untreated control. The percentage change between each two groups to be compared
was assessed using the formula(1)((Meanvalueofthefirstgroup−meanvalueofthesecondgroup)×100)×(Meanvalueofthefirstgroup)−1. Differences between the mean scores of any of the two groups to be
compared were tested for significance, using an unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t-test.
The data were considered significant if P values were less <.05.


## 4. Results

### 4.1. Parasitological Parameter (Faecal Smear Examination)

The mean parasitic count by field microscopy in the control and treated
groups, groups I and II, as  shown in Table1 was (40±7.2, and 2.4±1.00, resp.). The difference
between the treated groups was statistically
significant from respective untreated control hamsters at P<.001.
Again,  mucosal scrapings of the caecum revealed
1.8+0.6 Entamoeba trophozoites in the treated group compared to 18.4+6.8 in the
control untreated group. The difference was statistically significant at P<.001 (see
Table 1).Table 1
Faecal
trophozoite and/or cyst count, and caecal Mucosal scrapings of infected
hamsters given 6000E. histolytica cysts orally, treated 3 weeks later with artesunate
10 mgm/Kg b. wt, sacrificed 2 weeks later (5 weeks postinfection).
Animal groupNumber ofEntamoeba histolytica trophozoites and/or cysts/gm. faeces (106)Number ofEntamoeba histolytica trophozoites and/or cysts in the caecum/HP fieldGroup I: control infected untreated hamsters40
± 7.218.4±6.8Group II:
treated with 10 mmg/Kg
b. wt
artesunate triple divided dose on three successive days2.4+1.00***1.8+0.6***Means***  statistically significant
difference from infected control untreated hamsters at P<.001.


### 4.2. Pathological Parameter (Caecal Mucosal Scrapings)

In  the control infected
nontreated hamsters, atrophic degeneration of the
intestinal villi was shown (see Figure1). While the treated group revealed
complete regeneration of the endothelial cells as shown by haematoxylin and
eosin  stain (see Figure 2 and 3).Figure 1
Control
infected Giardia. Degeneration and eruption of intestinal villi in infected hamster (H&E
400x). G  = Giardia; D = degenerated endothelial cells.Figure 2
Intestinal villi in single treated infected hamster showing partial regeneration but still degenerated  endothelial cells could be detected (H&E 400x). G = Giardia; D = degenerated endothelial cells.Figure 3
Intestinal  villi in double treated infected hamster showing completed regeneration of endothelial cells (H&E 400x). G = Giardia; D = degenerated endothelial cells.


## 4.1. Parasitological Parameter (Faecal Smear Examination)

The mean parasitic count by field microscopy in the control and treated
groups, groups I and II, as  shown in Table1 was (40±7.2, and 2.4±1.00, resp.). The difference
between the treated groups was statistically
significant from respective untreated control hamsters at P<.001.
Again,  mucosal scrapings of the caecum revealed
1.8+0.6 Entamoeba trophozoites in the treated group compared to 18.4+6.8 in the
control untreated group. The difference was statistically significant at P<.001 (see
Table 1).Table 1
Faecal
trophozoite and/or cyst count, and caecal Mucosal scrapings of infected
hamsters given 6000E. histolytica cysts orally, treated 3 weeks later with artesunate
10 mgm/Kg b. wt, sacrificed 2 weeks later (5 weeks postinfection).
Animal groupNumber ofEntamoeba histolytica trophozoites and/or cysts/gm. faeces (106)Number ofEntamoeba histolytica trophozoites and/or cysts in the caecum/HP fieldGroup I: control infected untreated hamsters40
± 7.218.4±6.8Group II:
treated with 10 mmg/Kg
b. wt
artesunate triple divided dose on three successive days2.4+1.00***1.8+0.6***Means***  statistically significant
difference from infected control untreated hamsters at P<.001.


## 4.2. Pathological Parameter (Caecal Mucosal Scrapings)

In  the control infected
nontreated hamsters, atrophic degeneration of the
intestinal villi was shown (see Figure1). While the treated group revealed
complete regeneration of the endothelial cells as shown by haematoxylin and
eosin  stain (see Figure 2 and 3).Figure 1
Control
infected Giardia. Degeneration and eruption of intestinal villi in infected hamster (H&E
400x). G  = Giardia; D = degenerated endothelial cells.Figure 2
Intestinal villi in single treated infected hamster showing partial regeneration but still degenerated  endothelial cells could be detected (H&E 400x). G = Giardia; D = degenerated endothelial cells.Figure 3
Intestinal  villi in double treated infected hamster showing completed regeneration of endothelial cells (H&E 400x). G = Giardia; D = degenerated endothelial cells.


## 5. Discussion

Amoebiasisis a common  parasitic event with worldwide distribution. It can usually spread by direct faeco-oral transmission.Long before, Borst and Ouellette [6] stated that although studies of resistance mechanisms in parasites have lagged behind similar studies in bacteria and cancer cells, the tools to tackle this problem are rapidly improving. Transformation with exogenous DNA is now possible with all major parasitic
protozoa of humans. Hence, putative resistance genes can be tested in sensitive protozoa, allowing an unambiguous reconstruction of resistance mechanisms. Again, the authors approved that gene cloning, the polymerase chain reaction, and monoclonal antibodies against resistance-related proteins have made it possible to analyse potential resistance mechanisms in the few parasites that can be obtained from infected people. Loss of drug activation is the main mechanism of metronidazole resistance in Trichomonas and Giardia species. Finally, the authors concluded that a decrease of the proximal cellular electron donor for metronidazole activation, ferrodoxin, is the main cause of resistance in Trichomonas [6].The goldstandard in the defense mechanisms now available against parasitic protozoa  is chemotherapy. This defense is being eroded by drug resistance, and with few new drugs in the pipeline, prevention and circumvention of resistance are medical and veterinary priorities. By the advent of many antiamoebic preparations, and by the emergence of drug resistance to some of them, this experiment has been resorted to solve the problem of drug resistance toEntamoeba histolytica infection. From this study, it could be concluded that the antimalarial drug artesunate exerts a potent antiamoebic effect in experimental animals. This is evident by the absence of  faecal cysts recovered in the treated group. Again, this drug regimen was shown to ameliorate the deleterious effect of Entamoeba histolytica upon the caecal mucosa. This is evidenced by complete
villus regeneration recovered in this previously mentionned group. Previously, Fernández  et al. [1] noted  that the inhabitants of Northeast of Mexico use an infusion of leaves from Artemisia ludoviciana as an antidiarrheal remedy. The authors postulated that the aqueous, methanol, acetone, and hexane leaf extracts from mature plants were found to be active in vitro against the parasitic protozoa Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia.


## 6. Conclusion

The aim of this study was to testify the noxious imprint of the antimalarial drug artesunate, in intestinal
amoebiasis.  As a worldwide concern, this could be of crucial importance. In endemic areas like Egypt, amoebaisis is a common parasitic event, and resistance to the commonly used antiamoebic drugs constitutes a major health problem.



---

*Source: 327318-2009-01-20.xml*