# Analysis of Tribological Behavior of Carbon Nanotube Based Industrial Mineral Gear Oil 250 cSt Viscosity

Authors: Shubrajit Bhaumik; S. Prabhu; Kingsly Jeba Singh
Journal: Advances in Tribology
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

The paper investigates the exceptional antiwear and extreme pressure properties of multiwalled carbon nanotube based mineral oil. Different samples of oil containing varying proportions of MWNT (MWNT) and graphite were prepared. The samples were tested for their antiwear and load bearing capacity according to ASTM G99 and ASTM D-2783 standards. After pass load test in four ball tester the rubbed surfaces were investigated with Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images. The wear test results show a decrease wear by 70–75% in case of multiwalled nanotube based mineral oil as compared with pure mineral oil. Furthermore, it has been observed that the load bearing capacity in case of multiwalled carbon nanotube based mineral oil increases by 20% as compared to pure mineral oil. A comparison in the antiwear and load bearing capacity properties of graphite and nanotube based mineral oil was studied which showed the inefficiency of graphite based lubricant over MWNT based oil. Thus, the finding would be helpful in developing new nanoparticle based lubricants.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Lubrication is an important concept in the world of tribology. With the advancements of modern technologies the production rate in process plants has increased. The researchers are trying to avoid the frictional wear which occurs between the mating bodies, for example, gears. Gears are the most important mechanical elements in any industry and hence lubrication of gears is of high concern. Mineral oil has been known for a long time because of its low cost and ease of availability. The industrial gear mineral oil contains additives and sometimes graphite is added manually to improve the lubrication properties. Graphite is used as solid lubricant because of its lamellar structure which has slip planes which participates in lubrication. But graphite has its own disadvantages too. Being a solid, graphite is also responsible for wearing out of parent surfaces. Many types of additives such as molybdenum disulphide, phosphorus, sulfur, nitrogen, and chlorine compounds have been formulated and added to the base mineral oil to increase their antiwear (AW) and extreme pressure (EP) properties.The recent developments in the field of nanoparticles have attracted the researchers for critical applications. The newly developed nanoparticles have been observed to have superior mechanical and chemical properties than the macroparticles. Carbon nanotubes (MWNT) are one such discovery which has attracted the researchers because of their excellent mechanical and chemical properties. Carbon nanotubes were discovered by an eminent researcher, IIjima, in 1991 and have found their place in many critical applications. Mang and Dresel [1] investigated that it is essential to use antiwear and extreme pressure additives in order to reduce the wear in between machine parts when experiencing severe stress and strong forces. Iijima [2] discovered the carbon nanotubes which has drawn the attention of researchers because of their excellent properties. Mamalis et al. [3] investigated the flexibility in the physical properties of carbon nanotubes. Curasu et al. [4] investigated the frictional reduction capability and excellent AW/EP properties of SWMWNTs and obtained the optimum concentration as 0.5 wt% SWMWNTs. Hong et al. [5] observed that MWNT greases distinguish themselves from more common graphitic materials that of many years have been commonly used as solid grease additives. The performance of MWNT grease could be much better with the improvement of nanotube quality and purity. Marquis and Chibante [6] investigated that MWNT is found to considerably increase the thermal conductivity of many heat transfer fluids such as mineral and synthetic oils, water, water/ethylene glycol mixtures, and other commercial heat transfer fluids such as antifreeze. Wang et al. [7] concluded that when Ca
F
2 nanocrystals are used as lubricant additive in lithium grease, it can improve the wear resistance, load carrying capacity, and antifriction ability of lithium grease and obtained the optimum concentration is around 1 wt%. Ji et al. [8] observed that CaC
o
3 nanoparticles as an additive in lithium grease significantly improve its antiwear performance, friction reduction property, load carrying capacity, and extreme pressure property. The optimum concentration was observed to be at 5 wt %. Vakiki-Nezhaad and Dorany [9] investigated the increase in kinematic viscosity and viscosity index of 32.94% in case of lubricant on addition of single walled carbon nanotube. Hernández Battez et al. [10] studied the antiwear behavior of nanoparticles dispersed in PAO 6 oil in different concentrations and investigated the tribological behavior of various nanoparticles. Various other nanoparticles are such as LaF3 [11], carbon nanoonions [12], and copper oxide nanoparticles [13].Very few works have been reported on industrial gear oils using carbon nanotubes. This paper investigates the antiwear and extreme pressure properties of industrial mineral gear oil. The tests have been performed according to ASTM G 99 and ASTM D 2783 standards. Five different samples having different concentrations of additives have been analyzed for wear and load bearing capacity. The properties of the carbon nanotube (MWNT) based lubricant have been shown in Table1.Table 1
Properties of the lubricants.
Property
Mineral oil
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
Viscosity (cSt) at 40°C
248.61
249
249.70
251.85
249.56
Viscosity (cSt) at 100°C
29.6
30.01
31.2
31.52
31.68
Viscosity index
157.94
160.25
167.07
168.98
170.01
Flash point (°C)
216
218
220
218
222
Fire point (°C)
224
226
232
228
234Graphite has been added to the mineral oil as it is the most common solid lubricant used in industries. It has been observed that there is a slight increase in the chemicophysical in case of MWNT based lubricant compared with graphite based mineral oil. Carbon nanotubes are not flammable. Flash point refers to the condition where the fumes produced from the oil are just sufficient to produce flash. For continuous burning, that is, fire point, continuous vapor formation is necessary. Since carbon nanotubes are not flammable, hence higher temperatures are necessary for continuous burning of oil when concentrations of carbon nanotubes are higher. This could be the reason for an increase in fire point with increase in concentration of nanotubes.


## 2. Experimental Details

### 2.1. Materials

#### 2.1.1. Base Oil

Commercially available industrial gear mineral oil of viscosity 250 cSt, procured from lubricant dealer at Chennai, India, is chosen as it is commonly used in closed gear boxes in many process plants.


#### 2.1.2. Additives

Multiwalled carbon nanotubes as shown in Figure1 are used as an additive for comparing the tribological properties with classical additives (graphite which was bought from local vendor at Chennai, India). The MWNTs have been commercially bought from Cheap Tubes Inc.Figure 1
SEM image of MWNT.


### 2.2. Preparation of Nanolubricant

It is observed that MWNTs disperse well in mineral oil but sometimes agglomeration occurs. In order to get a stable lubricant for a longer time, a surfactant can be mixed when mixing other nanoadditives to the mineral oil. In the present work a stable lubricant is obtained by ultrasonication followed by hominization. No surfactants were used in the present work. Figure2 shows the specimens with various concentrations of MWNTs dispersed in mineral oil.Figure 2
(a) Mineral oil, (b) mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite, (c) mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT, (d) mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT, and (e) mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT.


### 2.3. Extreme Pressure Test

#### 2.3.1. Four-Ball Tester

A four-ball tester is used to evaluate the extreme pressure (EP) property of lubricant. The tribosystem consists of three stationary balls fixed in a ball pot which are pressed against the fourth ball fixed to the collet at required pressure. The top ball rotates at defined speed according to the test standards. The load is uniformly distributed over the three points where the three balls touch the fourth ball. The pot is filled with the lubricant. Rotation of the driving spindle causes a frictional torque that produces a scar on the lower balls. The test balls used had a 12.7 mm diameter and a roughness ofR
a = 0.016 mm and were made of AISI E 52100 steel. The test standards were performed according to the ASTM D-2783.The test was performed at M/s Ducom, Bangalore, using four-ball tester (model no. TR 30 L).


### 2.4. Wear Test

#### 2.4.1. Pin on Disk Test

The pin on disc test consists of an EN24 steel pin against an EN31 steel disc in the presence of 5 ± 0.2 mL lubricant under a 120 N load and a 0.26 m/s sliding speed. Steel pins of diameter 10 mm and length of 25 mm with a hardness of 88-89 HRB were used. The rotating disk in the present experiment had a hardness of 60 HRC. The test was performed at M/s Ducom, Bangalore, India, using pin-on-disk equipment (model no. TR 20).


### 2.5. SEM Analysis

The morphology of the rubbed surfaces was investigated using a field emission inspect (FEI) scanning electron microscope with a maximum resolution of 3 nm. SEM Analysis was carried out at Nanotechnology Research Centre, SRM University, Chennai, India, using high resolution scanning electron microscope (model no. FEI Quanta FEG 200).


### 2.6. Results and Discussions

#### 2.6.1. Four-Ball Test Results

To study the behavior of MWNTs under the above mentioned conditions, five specimens were compared under the same conditions: base mineral oil, base mineral oil with MWNT as an additive in three different concentrations (0.1, 0.5, and 0.6 wt%), and base mineral oil with graphite as an additive. The four-ball test results in Table2 investigated the load bearing capacity of each specimen.Table 2
Pass load and weld load values from the four-ball test.
Specimen
Pass load (Kg)
Weld load (Kg)
Mineral oil
126
160
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
160
200
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
160
200
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
160
200
Mineral oil + graphite
160
200As observed from Table2 and Figure 3, the pass load and weld load of the base mineral oil are less than that of the samples containing MWNT and graphite. Since the pass load and weld load values are the same, it does not mean that all the specimens have the same efficiency. The most efficient lubricant among the additive added specimens is investigated by comparing the scar diameter, flash temperature parameter, frictional torque, and coefficient of friction at their pass loads.Figure 3
Pass load and weld load values from the four-ball test setup.


#### 2.6.2. Scar Diameter

The scars are formed on the balls as they rotate at very high speeds in contact with each other. The lower the scar diameter is the higher the load bearing capacity is. The scar diameters of the four additive added samples are shown in Table3 and Figure 4.Table 3
Scar diameters of different specimens.
Specimen
Scar diameter at pass load (mm)
Base mineral oil
3.624
Base mineral oil + graphite
3.136
Base mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
2.431
Base mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
2.225
Base mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
2.313Figure 4
Scar diameter for different samples.Though the graphite and MWNT are allotropes of carbon, MWNTs have better physical properties compared to that of graphite. As the elastic modulus of MWNT is much higher than graphite, the MWNTs have the capability to withstand higher loads than graphite. Thus, graphite added specimen has larger scar diameter compared to MWNT specimens. From Figure4 it can be investigated that scar diameter decreases with the increase in concentration of MWNT but an increase in trend is observed on increasing the MWNT concentration. This may be due to the agglomeration of the nanoparticles. The parent metal might have absorbed the nanoparticles either chemically/physically and any excess in the concentration of the nanoparticles might have resulted in agglomeration of the particles which might have increased the drag force and internal resistance of the fluid due to which the lubricant film becomes unstable and results in metal to metal friction and hence a higher scar diameter.


#### 2.6.3. Flash Temperature Parameter

Flash temperature parameter (FTP) is a number that is used to express the critical flash temperature at which a lubricant will fail under given conditions. The higher value of FTP means that the lubricant film is less likely to break down:(1)
FTP
=
W
d
1.4
,
where W is load (N) and d is scar (mm) [14].From Table4 and Figure 5 it can be investigated that the higher the FTP value is, the more stable the film is. As observed from Figure 5 mineral oil with 0.5% wt MWNT shows the best FTP value. Thus, 0.5% wt MWNT would be more stable than any other sample due to the reason that at 0.5% wt MWNT the agglomeration of nanoparticles has not occurred. The lubricant film formed here is stable and hence no metal to metal friction has occurred due to which the scar generated is also minimal.Table 4
FTP values of all the specimens.
Specimen
FTP
Mineral oil
20.77
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
46.13
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
52.22
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
49.46
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
32.29Figure 5
FTP values of different oil samples.


#### 2.6.4. Frictional Torque

The frictional torque opposes the directional torque as there exists friction between the balls in contact as they are in rotary motion. When lubricant is added in the ball pot it forms a thin film between the balls in contact and hence reduces the coefficient of friction which results in reduction of frictional torque. The thickness of the lubricant film depends upon the properties of lubricant. If the film thickness is high then frictional torque will be low and vice versa. The frictional torques of four additive added specimens are given in Table5. Thus, it can be observed from Figure 6 that frictional torque decreases when nanotubes are added to the oil sample but an increasing trend is also observed due to the agglomeration of nanotubes.Table 5
Frictional torque at pass load.
Samples
Load (N)
Frictional torque (Nm)
Mineral oil
1569.6
4.86
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
1569.6
4.48
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
1569.6
3.11
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
1569.6
1.55
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
1569.6
2.90Figure 6
Graphical representation of frictional torque.


#### 2.6.5. Coefficient of Friction

The coefficient of friction plays a major role in determining the transmission efficiency via moving components where less resistance contributes to higher efficiency. Therefore, in terms of lubrication, less frictional coefficient is desirable. The coefficient of friction is obtained using the following formula:(2)
μ
=
T
6
3
W
r
,
where T is the frictional torque (Nm), W is the load (N), and r is the distance (m).As observed from Table6 and Figure 7, the coefficient of friction of MWNT based mineral oil is much less than graphite based mineral oil. As stated earlier and increase in trend in the observation is observed. Thus, it can be investigated that agglomeration of MWNT is a serious problem which needs to be arrested.Table 6
Coefficient of friction for different samples.
Specimen
Frictional torque (Nm)
Load (N)
Coefficient of friction
Mineral oil
4.86
1569.6
0.842
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
4.48
1569.6
0.63
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
3.11
1569.6
0.440
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
1.55
1569.6
0.21
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
2.90
1569.6
0.411Figure 7
Coefficient of friction for different specimens.


#### 2.6.6. Pin on Disk Test

The property of a lubricant is to reduce the wear rate additional to load bearing capacity. To test the wear rate the specimens are tested using a pin on disk apparatus under the above mentioned conditions. Figures9 and 10 show the wear results. The wear occurred using different lubricants which are tabulated in Table 7.Table 7
Pin on disk test results.
Specimen
Wear (micrometer)
Mineral oil
56
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
41
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
22
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
13.6
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
19.3From Table7 and Figure 8, it can be observed that wear in case of MWNT based mineral oil is much less than that of pure oil and graphite based oil. Thus, MWNT acts as better solid lubricant than graphite.Figure 8
Graphical representation of wear.Wear in (a) mineral oil and (b) mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite.
(a)
(b)Amount of wear in (a) mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT, (b) mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT, and (c) mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 2.7. SEM Analysis

The morphology of the rubbed surfaces of the balls of four-ball tester was analysed by scanning electron (make: Quanta FEG) microscope as shown in Figure11.SEM image of metal ball used in four-ball tester at pass load of (a) mineral oil, (b) mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite, (c) mineral oil + 0.1% MWNT, (d) mineral oil + 0.5% MWNT, and (e) mineral + 0.6% MWNT.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)From Figure11 it can be inferred that the heat generated due to metal to metal friction in case of the mineral oil and mineral oil + 0.5% graphite sample is higher due to which white layers are being observed in Figures 11(a) and 11(e). Thus, it can be seen that the lubricant film is not much stable in case of mineral oil and mineral oil + 0.5% graphite. In case of mineral oil + 0.1% MWNT and mineral oil + 0.6% MWNT the lubricant film is stable to a greater extent; hence, the formation of white layer is lower as compared to the base oil and graphite added specimen which can be seen in Figure 11. The image of mineral oil + 0.5% MWNT investigated lesser formation of heat effected zone. Thus, 0.5% wt MWNTs can be regarded to be the optimum quantity of MWNT. Rough surfaces are observed in large extent in case of the samples not containing MWNT that may have occurred due to the lubricant film failure leading to metal to metal friction. Further addition of MWNT may result in agglomeration of MWNTs which may have increased the frictional drag leading to lubrication film failure and resulting in microcracks as observed in Figure 11(e).The frictional reduction property and the antiwear property both depend on the dispersibility of the MWNT. Due to enormous aspect ratio and small diameter of MWNTs, a strong Van der-Waals attraction exists between the MWNTs which results in bundling of MWNTs. Hence, proper sonication has to be done in order to overcome the agglomeration of the MWNTs.


### 2.8. Conclusion

From the results investigated in the present work it can be concluded that MWNTs are more efficient additives than commonly used graphite. The properties of lubricants such as viscosity, viscosity index, flash point, and fire point have been enhanced after addition of nanoparticles. The load carrying capacity and antiwear properties which are important parameters for the lubricant have been observed to be higher in case of nanolubricants than the conventional lubricant. There exists an optimum concentration of 0.5% wt MWNT at which the coefficient of friction is least. Results show that on addition of carbon nanotubes the antiwear and load bearing capacity of the lubricant has improved, but an increase in concentration caused a reduction in lubricating properties of gear oil due to agglomeration and precipitation of nanoparticles which resulted in damage to frictional surfaces. This may also be attributed to the fact that a third body rolling effect between sliding surfaces occurs when nanoparticles are added in lubricant at lower concentration, whereas they interact in larger concentration, thus increasing friction. So determining the appropriate concentration to achieve better properties is a very important issue.


## 2.1. Materials

### 2.1.1. Base Oil

Commercially available industrial gear mineral oil of viscosity 250 cSt, procured from lubricant dealer at Chennai, India, is chosen as it is commonly used in closed gear boxes in many process plants.


### 2.1.2. Additives

Multiwalled carbon nanotubes as shown in Figure1 are used as an additive for comparing the tribological properties with classical additives (graphite which was bought from local vendor at Chennai, India). The MWNTs have been commercially bought from Cheap Tubes Inc.Figure 1
SEM image of MWNT.


## 2.1.1. Base Oil

Commercially available industrial gear mineral oil of viscosity 250 cSt, procured from lubricant dealer at Chennai, India, is chosen as it is commonly used in closed gear boxes in many process plants.


## 2.1.2. Additives

Multiwalled carbon nanotubes as shown in Figure1 are used as an additive for comparing the tribological properties with classical additives (graphite which was bought from local vendor at Chennai, India). The MWNTs have been commercially bought from Cheap Tubes Inc.Figure 1
SEM image of MWNT.


## 2.2. Preparation of Nanolubricant

It is observed that MWNTs disperse well in mineral oil but sometimes agglomeration occurs. In order to get a stable lubricant for a longer time, a surfactant can be mixed when mixing other nanoadditives to the mineral oil. In the present work a stable lubricant is obtained by ultrasonication followed by hominization. No surfactants were used in the present work. Figure2 shows the specimens with various concentrations of MWNTs dispersed in mineral oil.Figure 2
(a) Mineral oil, (b) mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite, (c) mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT, (d) mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT, and (e) mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT.


## 2.3. Extreme Pressure Test

### 2.3.1. Four-Ball Tester

A four-ball tester is used to evaluate the extreme pressure (EP) property of lubricant. The tribosystem consists of three stationary balls fixed in a ball pot which are pressed against the fourth ball fixed to the collet at required pressure. The top ball rotates at defined speed according to the test standards. The load is uniformly distributed over the three points where the three balls touch the fourth ball. The pot is filled with the lubricant. Rotation of the driving spindle causes a frictional torque that produces a scar on the lower balls. The test balls used had a 12.7 mm diameter and a roughness ofR
a = 0.016 mm and were made of AISI E 52100 steel. The test standards were performed according to the ASTM D-2783.The test was performed at M/s Ducom, Bangalore, using four-ball tester (model no. TR 30 L).


## 2.3.1. Four-Ball Tester

A four-ball tester is used to evaluate the extreme pressure (EP) property of lubricant. The tribosystem consists of three stationary balls fixed in a ball pot which are pressed against the fourth ball fixed to the collet at required pressure. The top ball rotates at defined speed according to the test standards. The load is uniformly distributed over the three points where the three balls touch the fourth ball. The pot is filled with the lubricant. Rotation of the driving spindle causes a frictional torque that produces a scar on the lower balls. The test balls used had a 12.7 mm diameter and a roughness ofR
a = 0.016 mm and were made of AISI E 52100 steel. The test standards were performed according to the ASTM D-2783.The test was performed at M/s Ducom, Bangalore, using four-ball tester (model no. TR 30 L).


## 2.4. Wear Test

### 2.4.1. Pin on Disk Test

The pin on disc test consists of an EN24 steel pin against an EN31 steel disc in the presence of 5 ± 0.2 mL lubricant under a 120 N load and a 0.26 m/s sliding speed. Steel pins of diameter 10 mm and length of 25 mm with a hardness of 88-89 HRB were used. The rotating disk in the present experiment had a hardness of 60 HRC. The test was performed at M/s Ducom, Bangalore, India, using pin-on-disk equipment (model no. TR 20).


## 2.4.1. Pin on Disk Test

The pin on disc test consists of an EN24 steel pin against an EN31 steel disc in the presence of 5 ± 0.2 mL lubricant under a 120 N load and a 0.26 m/s sliding speed. Steel pins of diameter 10 mm and length of 25 mm with a hardness of 88-89 HRB were used. The rotating disk in the present experiment had a hardness of 60 HRC. The test was performed at M/s Ducom, Bangalore, India, using pin-on-disk equipment (model no. TR 20).


## 2.5. SEM Analysis

The morphology of the rubbed surfaces was investigated using a field emission inspect (FEI) scanning electron microscope with a maximum resolution of 3 nm. SEM Analysis was carried out at Nanotechnology Research Centre, SRM University, Chennai, India, using high resolution scanning electron microscope (model no. FEI Quanta FEG 200).


## 2.6. Results and Discussions

### 2.6.1. Four-Ball Test Results

To study the behavior of MWNTs under the above mentioned conditions, five specimens were compared under the same conditions: base mineral oil, base mineral oil with MWNT as an additive in three different concentrations (0.1, 0.5, and 0.6 wt%), and base mineral oil with graphite as an additive. The four-ball test results in Table2 investigated the load bearing capacity of each specimen.Table 2
Pass load and weld load values from the four-ball test.
Specimen
Pass load (Kg)
Weld load (Kg)
Mineral oil
126
160
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
160
200
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
160
200
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
160
200
Mineral oil + graphite
160
200As observed from Table2 and Figure 3, the pass load and weld load of the base mineral oil are less than that of the samples containing MWNT and graphite. Since the pass load and weld load values are the same, it does not mean that all the specimens have the same efficiency. The most efficient lubricant among the additive added specimens is investigated by comparing the scar diameter, flash temperature parameter, frictional torque, and coefficient of friction at their pass loads.Figure 3
Pass load and weld load values from the four-ball test setup.


### 2.6.2. Scar Diameter

The scars are formed on the balls as they rotate at very high speeds in contact with each other. The lower the scar diameter is the higher the load bearing capacity is. The scar diameters of the four additive added samples are shown in Table3 and Figure 4.Table 3
Scar diameters of different specimens.
Specimen
Scar diameter at pass load (mm)
Base mineral oil
3.624
Base mineral oil + graphite
3.136
Base mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
2.431
Base mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
2.225
Base mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
2.313Figure 4
Scar diameter for different samples.Though the graphite and MWNT are allotropes of carbon, MWNTs have better physical properties compared to that of graphite. As the elastic modulus of MWNT is much higher than graphite, the MWNTs have the capability to withstand higher loads than graphite. Thus, graphite added specimen has larger scar diameter compared to MWNT specimens. From Figure4 it can be investigated that scar diameter decreases with the increase in concentration of MWNT but an increase in trend is observed on increasing the MWNT concentration. This may be due to the agglomeration of the nanoparticles. The parent metal might have absorbed the nanoparticles either chemically/physically and any excess in the concentration of the nanoparticles might have resulted in agglomeration of the particles which might have increased the drag force and internal resistance of the fluid due to which the lubricant film becomes unstable and results in metal to metal friction and hence a higher scar diameter.


### 2.6.3. Flash Temperature Parameter

Flash temperature parameter (FTP) is a number that is used to express the critical flash temperature at which a lubricant will fail under given conditions. The higher value of FTP means that the lubricant film is less likely to break down:(1)
FTP
=
W
d
1.4
,
where W is load (N) and d is scar (mm) [14].From Table4 and Figure 5 it can be investigated that the higher the FTP value is, the more stable the film is. As observed from Figure 5 mineral oil with 0.5% wt MWNT shows the best FTP value. Thus, 0.5% wt MWNT would be more stable than any other sample due to the reason that at 0.5% wt MWNT the agglomeration of nanoparticles has not occurred. The lubricant film formed here is stable and hence no metal to metal friction has occurred due to which the scar generated is also minimal.Table 4
FTP values of all the specimens.
Specimen
FTP
Mineral oil
20.77
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
46.13
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
52.22
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
49.46
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
32.29Figure 5
FTP values of different oil samples.


### 2.6.4. Frictional Torque

The frictional torque opposes the directional torque as there exists friction between the balls in contact as they are in rotary motion. When lubricant is added in the ball pot it forms a thin film between the balls in contact and hence reduces the coefficient of friction which results in reduction of frictional torque. The thickness of the lubricant film depends upon the properties of lubricant. If the film thickness is high then frictional torque will be low and vice versa. The frictional torques of four additive added specimens are given in Table5. Thus, it can be observed from Figure 6 that frictional torque decreases when nanotubes are added to the oil sample but an increasing trend is also observed due to the agglomeration of nanotubes.Table 5
Frictional torque at pass load.
Samples
Load (N)
Frictional torque (Nm)
Mineral oil
1569.6
4.86
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
1569.6
4.48
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
1569.6
3.11
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
1569.6
1.55
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
1569.6
2.90Figure 6
Graphical representation of frictional torque.


### 2.6.5. Coefficient of Friction

The coefficient of friction plays a major role in determining the transmission efficiency via moving components where less resistance contributes to higher efficiency. Therefore, in terms of lubrication, less frictional coefficient is desirable. The coefficient of friction is obtained using the following formula:(2)
μ
=
T
6
3
W
r
,
where T is the frictional torque (Nm), W is the load (N), and r is the distance (m).As observed from Table6 and Figure 7, the coefficient of friction of MWNT based mineral oil is much less than graphite based mineral oil. As stated earlier and increase in trend in the observation is observed. Thus, it can be investigated that agglomeration of MWNT is a serious problem which needs to be arrested.Table 6
Coefficient of friction for different samples.
Specimen
Frictional torque (Nm)
Load (N)
Coefficient of friction
Mineral oil
4.86
1569.6
0.842
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
4.48
1569.6
0.63
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
3.11
1569.6
0.440
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
1.55
1569.6
0.21
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
2.90
1569.6
0.411Figure 7
Coefficient of friction for different specimens.


### 2.6.6. Pin on Disk Test

The property of a lubricant is to reduce the wear rate additional to load bearing capacity. To test the wear rate the specimens are tested using a pin on disk apparatus under the above mentioned conditions. Figures9 and 10 show the wear results. The wear occurred using different lubricants which are tabulated in Table 7.Table 7
Pin on disk test results.
Specimen
Wear (micrometer)
Mineral oil
56
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
41
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
22
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
13.6
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
19.3From Table7 and Figure 8, it can be observed that wear in case of MWNT based mineral oil is much less than that of pure oil and graphite based oil. Thus, MWNT acts as better solid lubricant than graphite.Figure 8
Graphical representation of wear.Wear in (a) mineral oil and (b) mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite.
(a)
(b)Amount of wear in (a) mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT, (b) mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT, and (c) mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 2.6.1. Four-Ball Test Results

To study the behavior of MWNTs under the above mentioned conditions, five specimens were compared under the same conditions: base mineral oil, base mineral oil with MWNT as an additive in three different concentrations (0.1, 0.5, and 0.6 wt%), and base mineral oil with graphite as an additive. The four-ball test results in Table2 investigated the load bearing capacity of each specimen.Table 2
Pass load and weld load values from the four-ball test.
Specimen
Pass load (Kg)
Weld load (Kg)
Mineral oil
126
160
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
160
200
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
160
200
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
160
200
Mineral oil + graphite
160
200As observed from Table2 and Figure 3, the pass load and weld load of the base mineral oil are less than that of the samples containing MWNT and graphite. Since the pass load and weld load values are the same, it does not mean that all the specimens have the same efficiency. The most efficient lubricant among the additive added specimens is investigated by comparing the scar diameter, flash temperature parameter, frictional torque, and coefficient of friction at their pass loads.Figure 3
Pass load and weld load values from the four-ball test setup.


## 2.6.2. Scar Diameter

The scars are formed on the balls as they rotate at very high speeds in contact with each other. The lower the scar diameter is the higher the load bearing capacity is. The scar diameters of the four additive added samples are shown in Table3 and Figure 4.Table 3
Scar diameters of different specimens.
Specimen
Scar diameter at pass load (mm)
Base mineral oil
3.624
Base mineral oil + graphite
3.136
Base mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
2.431
Base mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
2.225
Base mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
2.313Figure 4
Scar diameter for different samples.Though the graphite and MWNT are allotropes of carbon, MWNTs have better physical properties compared to that of graphite. As the elastic modulus of MWNT is much higher than graphite, the MWNTs have the capability to withstand higher loads than graphite. Thus, graphite added specimen has larger scar diameter compared to MWNT specimens. From Figure4 it can be investigated that scar diameter decreases with the increase in concentration of MWNT but an increase in trend is observed on increasing the MWNT concentration. This may be due to the agglomeration of the nanoparticles. The parent metal might have absorbed the nanoparticles either chemically/physically and any excess in the concentration of the nanoparticles might have resulted in agglomeration of the particles which might have increased the drag force and internal resistance of the fluid due to which the lubricant film becomes unstable and results in metal to metal friction and hence a higher scar diameter.


## 2.6.3. Flash Temperature Parameter

Flash temperature parameter (FTP) is a number that is used to express the critical flash temperature at which a lubricant will fail under given conditions. The higher value of FTP means that the lubricant film is less likely to break down:(1)
FTP
=
W
d
1.4
,
where W is load (N) and d is scar (mm) [14].From Table4 and Figure 5 it can be investigated that the higher the FTP value is, the more stable the film is. As observed from Figure 5 mineral oil with 0.5% wt MWNT shows the best FTP value. Thus, 0.5% wt MWNT would be more stable than any other sample due to the reason that at 0.5% wt MWNT the agglomeration of nanoparticles has not occurred. The lubricant film formed here is stable and hence no metal to metal friction has occurred due to which the scar generated is also minimal.Table 4
FTP values of all the specimens.
Specimen
FTP
Mineral oil
20.77
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
46.13
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
52.22
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
49.46
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
32.29Figure 5
FTP values of different oil samples.


## 2.6.4. Frictional Torque

The frictional torque opposes the directional torque as there exists friction between the balls in contact as they are in rotary motion. When lubricant is added in the ball pot it forms a thin film between the balls in contact and hence reduces the coefficient of friction which results in reduction of frictional torque. The thickness of the lubricant film depends upon the properties of lubricant. If the film thickness is high then frictional torque will be low and vice versa. The frictional torques of four additive added specimens are given in Table5. Thus, it can be observed from Figure 6 that frictional torque decreases when nanotubes are added to the oil sample but an increasing trend is also observed due to the agglomeration of nanotubes.Table 5
Frictional torque at pass load.
Samples
Load (N)
Frictional torque (Nm)
Mineral oil
1569.6
4.86
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
1569.6
4.48
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
1569.6
3.11
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
1569.6
1.55
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
1569.6
2.90Figure 6
Graphical representation of frictional torque.


## 2.6.5. Coefficient of Friction

The coefficient of friction plays a major role in determining the transmission efficiency via moving components where less resistance contributes to higher efficiency. Therefore, in terms of lubrication, less frictional coefficient is desirable. The coefficient of friction is obtained using the following formula:(2)
μ
=
T
6
3
W
r
,
where T is the frictional torque (Nm), W is the load (N), and r is the distance (m).As observed from Table6 and Figure 7, the coefficient of friction of MWNT based mineral oil is much less than graphite based mineral oil. As stated earlier and increase in trend in the observation is observed. Thus, it can be investigated that agglomeration of MWNT is a serious problem which needs to be arrested.Table 6
Coefficient of friction for different samples.
Specimen
Frictional torque (Nm)
Load (N)
Coefficient of friction
Mineral oil
4.86
1569.6
0.842
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
4.48
1569.6
0.63
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
3.11
1569.6
0.440
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
1.55
1569.6
0.21
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
2.90
1569.6
0.411Figure 7
Coefficient of friction for different specimens.


## 2.6.6. Pin on Disk Test

The property of a lubricant is to reduce the wear rate additional to load bearing capacity. To test the wear rate the specimens are tested using a pin on disk apparatus under the above mentioned conditions. Figures9 and 10 show the wear results. The wear occurred using different lubricants which are tabulated in Table 7.Table 7
Pin on disk test results.
Specimen
Wear (micrometer)
Mineral oil
56
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite
41
Mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT
22
Mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT
13.6
Mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT
19.3From Table7 and Figure 8, it can be observed that wear in case of MWNT based mineral oil is much less than that of pure oil and graphite based oil. Thus, MWNT acts as better solid lubricant than graphite.Figure 8
Graphical representation of wear.Wear in (a) mineral oil and (b) mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite.
(a)
(b)Amount of wear in (a) mineral oil + 0.1% wt MWNT, (b) mineral oil + 0.5% wt MWNT, and (c) mineral oil + 0.6% wt MWNT.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 2.7. SEM Analysis

The morphology of the rubbed surfaces of the balls of four-ball tester was analysed by scanning electron (make: Quanta FEG) microscope as shown in Figure11.SEM image of metal ball used in four-ball tester at pass load of (a) mineral oil, (b) mineral oil + 0.5% wt graphite, (c) mineral oil + 0.1% MWNT, (d) mineral oil + 0.5% MWNT, and (e) mineral + 0.6% MWNT.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)From Figure11 it can be inferred that the heat generated due to metal to metal friction in case of the mineral oil and mineral oil + 0.5% graphite sample is higher due to which white layers are being observed in Figures 11(a) and 11(e). Thus, it can be seen that the lubricant film is not much stable in case of mineral oil and mineral oil + 0.5% graphite. In case of mineral oil + 0.1% MWNT and mineral oil + 0.6% MWNT the lubricant film is stable to a greater extent; hence, the formation of white layer is lower as compared to the base oil and graphite added specimen which can be seen in Figure 11. The image of mineral oil + 0.5% MWNT investigated lesser formation of heat effected zone. Thus, 0.5% wt MWNTs can be regarded to be the optimum quantity of MWNT. Rough surfaces are observed in large extent in case of the samples not containing MWNT that may have occurred due to the lubricant film failure leading to metal to metal friction. Further addition of MWNT may result in agglomeration of MWNTs which may have increased the frictional drag leading to lubrication film failure and resulting in microcracks as observed in Figure 11(e).The frictional reduction property and the antiwear property both depend on the dispersibility of the MWNT. Due to enormous aspect ratio and small diameter of MWNTs, a strong Van der-Waals attraction exists between the MWNTs which results in bundling of MWNTs. Hence, proper sonication has to be done in order to overcome the agglomeration of the MWNTs.


## 2.8. Conclusion

From the results investigated in the present work it can be concluded that MWNTs are more efficient additives than commonly used graphite. The properties of lubricants such as viscosity, viscosity index, flash point, and fire point have been enhanced after addition of nanoparticles. The load carrying capacity and antiwear properties which are important parameters for the lubricant have been observed to be higher in case of nanolubricants than the conventional lubricant. There exists an optimum concentration of 0.5% wt MWNT at which the coefficient of friction is least. Results show that on addition of carbon nanotubes the antiwear and load bearing capacity of the lubricant has improved, but an increase in concentration caused a reduction in lubricating properties of gear oil due to agglomeration and precipitation of nanoparticles which resulted in damage to frictional surfaces. This may also be attributed to the fact that a third body rolling effect between sliding surfaces occurs when nanoparticles are added in lubricant at lower concentration, whereas they interact in larger concentration, thus increasing friction. So determining the appropriate concentration to achieve better properties is a very important issue.



---

*Source: 341365-2014-03-13.xml*