# Directivity Enhancement of a Broadband Printed Antenna by Using Two Closely Spaced Strips

Authors: Jiangniu Wu; Jing Sun; Jinyong Fang
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

The bandwidth of a printed rectangular loop antenna with two gaps can be enlarged by using the metallic strips as directors. However, the directivity is not good. Because the two closely spaced metallic strips act as a building block, they can be used to block the propagation of electromagnetic waves. Therefore, two closely spaced metallic strips as a new reflector are adopted and investigated in this paper for improving the directivity of antenna. Two arrangement modes of the printed antennas with two closely spaced strips are designed, fabricated, and measured. Experimental results show that the impedance bandwidth of type A antenna (with inner strip) is about 62.5% ranging from 2.3 to 4.39 GHz. In addition, the gain of 3.8–5.2 dBi and 2 dB improvement of F/B ratio are achieved. Type B antenna (with outer strip) can realize a 62% measured bandwidth ranging from 2.29 to 4.35 GHz. Also, about 3.4 to 4.9 dBi of gain with 2.5 dB improvement of F/B ratio is obtained. The measured F/B ratios of the two modified antennas are both better than 10 dB within the operating frequency band. Measured results verified that adopting the two closely spaced metallic strips as a new reflector can both enhance the F/B ratio and gain without changing the overall dimensions and operating frequency.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

With the rapid development of wireless communication systems, the need for wide impedance bandwidth and low-profile antennas with good electrical characteristics is ever demanding [1, 2]. In some cases, for example, for point-to-point high-speed data communications and short-range wireless local networks, the antennas with unidirectional radiation patterns are required to suppress the unwanted interference signals and optimize the power efficiency or coverage range [3, 4].The printed Yagi antenna is a prevalent option in many applications due to its simple structure and unidirectional radiation characteristics [5]. The typical configuration of this antenna consists of a driven element (driver) and some parasitic elements, including a reflector and one or more directors. The radiation resistance of this antenna drops quickly along with the decrease of spacing between the elements, which will lead to low radiation efficiency [6–8]. For some cases, the radiation resistance drops to 50 Ω in the special frequency point. Good impedance matching can be achieved, and a new resonant frequency point can be induced [9]. This type antenna has a good directivity but has the drawback of narrow band characteristics.By introducing two gaps in the printed rectangular loop, the bent strip at the bottom acts as a reflector. Then, the printed rectangular loop antenna can be regarded as a printed bent Yagi antenna [10]. A good cardioid unidirectional radiation characteristic is achieved. However, this printed antenna has a relatively narrow bandwidth. In order to extend the impedance bandwidth, a strip was adopted in [11]. The bandwidth was greatly expanded, and a 40.7% measured bandwidth was obtained. Another metal strip was also added at the maximum radiation direction of the loop in [12] for further increasing the directivity. However, owing to the drawback of narrow characteristics of single strip, the antenna directivity will be decreased when the new resonant frequency points are designed far away from the original one decided by the loop.In this paper, the aim is to improve the antenna directivity. Because the two closely spaced metallic strips act as a building block, they can be used to block the propagation of electromagnetic waves [13]. Then, the two closely spaced metallic strips can block the propagation of electromagnetic waves. Therefore, the two closely spaced metallic strips are adopted as a new reflector to improve the F/B ratio in this paper. Two arrangement modes of the printed antennas with closely spaced metal strips are designed, fabricated, and measured. Both simulation and measured results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed designed arrangement modes.


## 2. Performance of the Reference Antenna

Due to the introduced two gaps, the rectangular loop antenna presented in [10] can be regarded as a two-element printed Yagi antenna. Thus, a unidirectional radiation characteristic is achieved. The input impedance decreases at the high-frequency resonant point and the impedance matching is improved when a metallic strip is added. A wide impedance bandwidth was obtained in [11]. However, the impendence matching and directivity are limited by the metallic strip. In order to further increase the impendence bandwidth and improve the directivity, another metallic strip as a new director is added at the maximum radiation direction [12].The structure and parameters of the reference antenna in [12] are depicted in Figure 1(a). This antenna is printed on a FR4 substrate with dielectric constant of 4.4 and thickness of 0.4 mm. This antenna utilizes two metallic strips for further improving the impedance matching and antenna directivity. As shown in Figure 1(a), the two strips (strip 1 and strip 2) are placed in the maximum radiation direction of the rectangular loop antenna. A port with 50 Ω characteristic impedance is used to feed the antenna for simulations.Figure 1
Geometries and parameters of the broadband printed antennas. (a) The reference antenna in [12] and two arrangement modes of the proposed printed antennas by adopting two closely spaced strips for directivity enhancement. (b) Type A antenna with inner strip. (c) Type B antenna with outer strip.
(a)(b)(c)Here, the effects of the strip 1 and strip 2 are firstly discussed. Figure2 shows the comparison of the rectangular loop with only strip 1 and with two strips (strip 1 and strip 2). As shown in Figure 2, the impedance matching is further improved when strip 2 is added to the maximum radiation direction. Another new resonant frequency point appears at the higher frequency band. In addition, the impedance matching between the first resonant frequency point and the second resonant frequency point is also improved due to the introduced strip 2. Thus, the bandwidth is further enlarged and a wider bandwidth is obtained. The simulated F/B ratio is also plotted in Figure 2. It is observed that about 9 dB of F/B ratio at 3.1 GHz is achieved when strip 2 is introduced. Compared with the result of rectangular loop antenna with only strip 1, the F/B ratio has been increased about 1.5 dB. However, the antenna directivity is still not good.Figure 2
Comparison of the printed rectangular loop antenna with only strip 1 and with two strips (strip 1 and strip 2) on reflection coefficient and F/B ratio for the reference antenna.The optimized parameters of the reference antenna in [12] are as follows: d1 = 10.2 mm, d2 = 4 mm, d3 = 6 mm, w0 = 2.2 mm, w1 = 2.2 mm, w2 = 2.2 mm, g = 1.4 mm, g1 = 0.8 mm, g2 = 2.8 mm, l1 = 38.4 mm, l2 = 25 mm, and l3 = 24.6 mm. The photographs of the fabricated reference antenna are shown in Figure 3. A flexible 50 Ω coaxial cable is used to feed the fabricated antenna for the measurement. The fabricated antenna is measured by using an Agilent E8363B programmable network analyzer (PNA) and SATIMO measurement system.Figure 3
Photographs of the fabricated reference antenna.The simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the loop antenna with two strips (strip 1 and strip 2) are shown in Figure4. Good agreement between the simulations and measurements can be observed. The measured bandwidth is approximately 63.1% ranging from 2.29 to 4.4 GHz, which is larger than that of the loop antenna without or only with strip 1 (the bandwidths of the antenna without and with strip 1 are about 12.7% and 40.6% according to the measured results in [11]). This proves that the impedance bandwidth has been greatly enlarged by adding the new strip 2.Figure 4
Simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the reference antenna.The gain of the reference antenna is also shown in this figure. In the operating band, the minimum gain is at 3.1 GHz with a value of 3.5 dBi and the maximum gain is at 2.3 GHz with a value of 4.9 dBi. The measured gain is higher than 3.5 dBi with a variation of 1.5 dB in the band from 2.29–4.4 GHz. The gain drops down quickly when the frequency is higher than 4.4 GHz. This is mainly caused by the impedance mismatching at the high-frequency band.Figure5 plots the measured and simulated radiation patterns of the reference antenna in the E-plane (xoy-plane) and H-plane (yoz-plane) at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4 GHz, respectively. It is observed that the simulated results and measurement results match well. As shown in the figure, the reference antenna has unidirectional radiation characteristics. More importantly, the main lobes of the radiation patterns are fixed to the endfire direction (y-axis direction) within the effective working frequency band. Stable radiation directivity can be observed.Figure 5
Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the reference antenna in both E-plane (xoy-plane) and H-plane (yoz-plane) at different frequencies: (a) 2.5 GHz, (b) 3.0 GHz, (c) 3.5 GHz, and (d) 4 GHz.
(a)(b)(c)(d)The measured F/B ratio of the reference antenna is depicted in Figure6. According to the measured results, the F/B ratio is more than 8.1 dB of the operation frequency band (2.29–4.4 GHz). The radiation efficiency of the fabricated antenna is also shown in this figure. For most of the operation frequency band, this antenna has high radiation efficiency around 80%. However, the F/B ratio of this antenna is not enough for the unidirectional radiation application. If this antenna is to be used in point-to-point communication systems, the directivity of the reference antenna needs to be further improved. In the next section, two closely spaced metallic strips are adopted to improve the antenna directivity without changing the overall antenna dimensions and the operating frequency band.Figure 6
Measured F/B ratio and radiation efficiency of the reference antenna in [12].


## 3. Antenna Designs with Improved Directivity by Using Two Closely Spaced Strips

As mentioned in the Section2, the F/B ratio of the reference antenna in [12] at the center frequency is about 8.1 dB, which is not enough for a unidirectional radiation antenna. In this section, the F/B ratio of the reference antenna is improved. Because the two closely spaced metallic strips act as a building block [13], the two closely spaced metallic strips can block the propagation of electromagnetic waves. For the printed rectangular loop antenna with two gaps, two closely spaced metal strips at the bottom of antenna are adopted as a new reflector to improve the F/B ratio of reference antenna. When the lengths of the two closely spaced metallic strips are set to different values, the two closely spaced metallic strips can provide a wideband reflection capability. Then, a higher directivity with wide impedance bandwidth can be achieved.In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the above method, two arrangement modes of the antenna with two closely spaced strips are designed. The structures of the improved antennas by using two closely spaced metallic strips at antenna bottom are also depicted in Figures1(b) and 1(c). The antenna shown in Figure 1(b) is named as type A antenna and the one shown in Figure 1(c) is named as type B antenna. All the antennas are printed on a piece of FR4 substrate with a dielectric constant of 4.4 and a thickness of 0.4 mm. A port with 50 Ω characteristic impedance is used to feed the two antennas for studying their radiation characteristics.Figure7 shows the simulated reflection coefficients and the F/B ratios of three types of antennas, which are the reference antenna in [12], type A antenna, and type B antenna, respectively. As shown in Figure 7, the impedance matching of antenna is slightly changed when a new strip is closely added to the bottom strip. However, the antenna with new strip arranged as type A or type B has a higher F/B ratio compared with that of the reference antenna in the whole operating frequency band. This means that adopting the two closely spaced strips as a new reflector is very effective to improve the antenna directivity. A wideband reflection capability can be provided by using the two bent closely spaced metallic strips to replace the bottom single bent strip.Figure 7
Comparison of simulated reflection coefficients and F/B ratios of the reference antenna and proposed improved antennas of type A and type B.During the optimization, the parameters of the two bent closely spaced strips are mainly optimized. By optimization, the final optimized parameters of the antenna are as follows:d1 = 10.2 mm, d2 = 4 mm, d3 = 6 mm, w0 = 2.2 mm, w1 = 2.2 mm, w2 = 2.2 mm, g = 1.4 mm, g1 = 0.8 mm, g2 = 2.8 mm, l1 = 38.4 mm, l2 = 25 mm, and l3 = 24.6 mm. The additional parameters for type A antenna are w4 = 1.9 mm, s1 = 0.15 mm, and d4 = 10.6 mm, and the parameters for type B antenna are w5 = 2.1 mm, s2 = 0.3 mm, and d5 = 8 mm.In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the improved designs, the prototypes of the proposed two arrangement modes are fabricated and measured. The photographs of the fabricated antennas are shown in Figure8. The left one is type A antenna with inner strip and the right one is type B antenna with outer strip. Two flexible 50 Ω coaxial cables similar to those in [7, 11, 12] are used to feed the fabricated antennas for the measurement. For each antenna, the inner conductor of coaxial cable is connected to one arm of the bent dipole of rectangular loop antenna while the outer conductor of the coaxial cable is soldered to another arm. The impedance bandwidths of the fabricated antennas are obtained by using an Agilent E8363B programmable network analyzer (PNA). Also, the realized gain and radiation patterns of the fabricated antenna are obtained by using the SATIMO antenna measurement system.Figure 8
Photographs of the fabricated improved antennas (the left one is type A antenna and the right one is type B antenna).


### 3.1. Type A Antenna

The photograph of type A antenna is shown on the left-hand side of Figure8. The simulated and measured reflection coefficients of type A antenna are shown in Figure 9. According to the measured results, the bandwidth of type A antenna is about 62.5% ranging from 2.3 to 4.39 GHz. The impedance bandwidth shrinks little compared with the result in Figure 4 due to the added inner strip. The measured gain of type A antenna is also shown in Figure 8. In the band between 2.3 and 4.39 GHz, the minimum gain is at the frequency of 4.3 GHz with a value of 3.8 dBi and the maximum gain is at the frequency of 2.3 GHz with a value of 5.2 dBi. In other words, the measured gain is better than 3.8 dBi in the whole operating frequency band. The realized gain is improved by adding the inner strip closely to the bottom strip compared with the reference antenna in [12]. As the frequency goes up, the gain decreases a little.Figure 9
Measured and simulated results of reflection coefficients and gains of type A antenna (w4 = 1.9 mm, s1 = 0.15 mm, and d4 = 10.6 mm).The simulated and measured radiation patterns of type A antenna in E-plane (xoy-plane) and H-plane (yoz-plane) at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4 GHz are depicted in Figure 10. It is observed that the experiment measurements are in agreement with the simulated results. In the operating frequency band, the main lobes of the radiation patterns are fixed to the y-axis direction. In addition, low back radiation characteristics are achieved by using two closely spaced metallic strips.Figure 10
Measured radiation patterns of type A antenna at different frequencies in (a) E-plane (xoy-plane) and (b) H-plane (yoz-plane).
(a)(b)The measured F/B ratio and radiation efficiency of type A antenna are shown in Figure11 for further illustrating the effect of the inner metallic strip. The measured F/B ratio is more than 10 dB in the whole operating frequency band. Compared with the result shown in Figure 6, approximately 1.9 dB of F/B ratio is improved due to the inner metallic strip. The measured radiation efficiency is also shown in Figure 11. For most of the frequency band (2.3–4.39 GHz), the measured radiation efficiency of type A antenna is around 80%.Figure 11
Measured F/B ratio and radiation efficiency of type A antenna.


### 3.2. Type B Antenna

The photograph of another arrangement mode named type B is shown at the right-hand side of Figure8. The simulated and measured reflection coefficients and antenna gains of type B antenna are shown in Figure 12. According to the measured results, a 62% measured bandwidth ranging from 2.29 to 4.35 GHz is obtained. In the band from 2.29 to 4.35 GHz, the minimum gain is at the frequency of 3.1 GHz with a value of 3.4 dBi and the maximum gain at the frequency of 2.3 GHz with a value of 4.9 dBi. The measured gain is better than 3.4 dBi in the whole operating frequency band. The antenna gain is slightly changed compared with the results shown in Figure 4.Figure 12
Measured and simulated results of reflection coefficients and gains of type B antenna (w5 = 2.1 mm, s2 = 0.3 mm, and d5 = 8 mm).The simulated and measured radiation patterns of type B antenna in E-plane (xoy-plane) and H-plane (yoz-plane) at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4 GHz are depicted in Figure 13. Good agreement between the simulations and measurements can also be observed. The main lobes of the radiation patterns are also fixed to the y-axis direction in the operating frequency range.Figure 13
Measured radiation patterns of type B antenna at different frequencies in (a) E-plane (xoy-plane) and (b) H-plane (yoz-plane).
(a)(b)The measured F/B ratio and radiation efficiency for type B antenna are shown in Figure14. It is observed that the measured F/B ratio is better than 10.6 dB in the whole operating frequency band. Compared with the results shown in Figure 6, approximately 2.5 dB of F/B ratio is increased due to the outer metallic strip. For most of the frequency band (2.29–4.35 GHz), the measured radiation efficiency of type B antenna is also around 80%. The radiation efficiency is almost not changed compared with that of the reference antenna in [12].Figure 14
Measured F/B ratios and radiation efficiency of type B antenna.In order to further illustrate the performances of the improved antennas, Table1 shows the comparisons among the designed antennas (type A and type B) and the reference antennas in [11, 12] in terms of bandwidth, antenna gain, front-to-back ratio, and the antenna sizes. According to the Table 1, the reference antenna shown in [11] has 40.6% impedance bandwidth. The gain of this antenna is better than 3.3 dBi within the operating frequency range. When a new additional strip is added to the director strip as in [12], although the bandwidth is further improved and a 63.1% measured bandwidth ranging from 2.29 to 4.4 GHz is achieved, the front-to-back ratio of the antenna is reduced. In order to overcome this problem, two closely spaced metallic strips were adopted as a new reflector to improve the F/B ratio of the antenna. Therefore, two arrangement modes of the improved antennas named type A and type B are designed and measured. The measured results of the two improved designs are also listed in Table 1. According to specifications in Table 1, the impedance bandwidth of type A antenna is about 62.5% ranging from 2.3 to 4.39 GHz, which is approximately equal to the reference antenna in [12]. However, about 0.3 dB of gain and 2 dB of F/B ratio are improved. Type B antenna can realize a 62% impedance bandwidth ranging from 2.29 to 4.35 GHz. Although the gain of type B antenna is about 3.4 dBi to 4.9 dBi, which is approximately equal to the reference antenna in [12], type B antenna achieved a higher F/B ratio better than 10.6 dB. Compared with that of the reference antenna in [12], the directivity of type B antenna is greatly improved. Thus, the effectiveness of adopting two closely spaced metallic strips to improve the antenna directivity is verified by using the measured results of the two fabricated antennas. In addition, the F/B ratios of the two fabricated antennas are both improved and better than 10 dB without changing the overall dimensions and the operating frequency.Table 1
Performance comparison between different antennas.
AntennasRef. [11]Ref. [12]Type AType BBandwidth (GHz)2.29–3.462.29–4.42.3–4.392.29–4.35Realized gain (dBi)3.3–4.83.5–4.93.8–5.23.4–4.9F/B ratio (dB)≥ 10≥ 8.1≥ 10.1≥ 10.6Sub. sizes (mm2)60 × 5060 × 5060 × 5060 × 50Ant. Struc. (mm2)38 × 2438 × 2838 × 2843 × 30.5


## 3.1. Type A Antenna

The photograph of type A antenna is shown on the left-hand side of Figure8. The simulated and measured reflection coefficients of type A antenna are shown in Figure 9. According to the measured results, the bandwidth of type A antenna is about 62.5% ranging from 2.3 to 4.39 GHz. The impedance bandwidth shrinks little compared with the result in Figure 4 due to the added inner strip. The measured gain of type A antenna is also shown in Figure 8. In the band between 2.3 and 4.39 GHz, the minimum gain is at the frequency of 4.3 GHz with a value of 3.8 dBi and the maximum gain is at the frequency of 2.3 GHz with a value of 5.2 dBi. In other words, the measured gain is better than 3.8 dBi in the whole operating frequency band. The realized gain is improved by adding the inner strip closely to the bottom strip compared with the reference antenna in [12]. As the frequency goes up, the gain decreases a little.Figure 9
Measured and simulated results of reflection coefficients and gains of type A antenna (w4 = 1.9 mm, s1 = 0.15 mm, and d4 = 10.6 mm).The simulated and measured radiation patterns of type A antenna in E-plane (xoy-plane) and H-plane (yoz-plane) at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4 GHz are depicted in Figure 10. It is observed that the experiment measurements are in agreement with the simulated results. In the operating frequency band, the main lobes of the radiation patterns are fixed to the y-axis direction. In addition, low back radiation characteristics are achieved by using two closely spaced metallic strips.Figure 10
Measured radiation patterns of type A antenna at different frequencies in (a) E-plane (xoy-plane) and (b) H-plane (yoz-plane).
(a)(b)The measured F/B ratio and radiation efficiency of type A antenna are shown in Figure11 for further illustrating the effect of the inner metallic strip. The measured F/B ratio is more than 10 dB in the whole operating frequency band. Compared with the result shown in Figure 6, approximately 1.9 dB of F/B ratio is improved due to the inner metallic strip. The measured radiation efficiency is also shown in Figure 11. For most of the frequency band (2.3–4.39 GHz), the measured radiation efficiency of type A antenna is around 80%.Figure 11
Measured F/B ratio and radiation efficiency of type A antenna.


## 3.2. Type B Antenna

The photograph of another arrangement mode named type B is shown at the right-hand side of Figure8. The simulated and measured reflection coefficients and antenna gains of type B antenna are shown in Figure 12. According to the measured results, a 62% measured bandwidth ranging from 2.29 to 4.35 GHz is obtained. In the band from 2.29 to 4.35 GHz, the minimum gain is at the frequency of 3.1 GHz with a value of 3.4 dBi and the maximum gain at the frequency of 2.3 GHz with a value of 4.9 dBi. The measured gain is better than 3.4 dBi in the whole operating frequency band. The antenna gain is slightly changed compared with the results shown in Figure 4.Figure 12
Measured and simulated results of reflection coefficients and gains of type B antenna (w5 = 2.1 mm, s2 = 0.3 mm, and d5 = 8 mm).The simulated and measured radiation patterns of type B antenna in E-plane (xoy-plane) and H-plane (yoz-plane) at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4 GHz are depicted in Figure 13. Good agreement between the simulations and measurements can also be observed. The main lobes of the radiation patterns are also fixed to the y-axis direction in the operating frequency range.Figure 13
Measured radiation patterns of type B antenna at different frequencies in (a) E-plane (xoy-plane) and (b) H-plane (yoz-plane).
(a)(b)The measured F/B ratio and radiation efficiency for type B antenna are shown in Figure14. It is observed that the measured F/B ratio is better than 10.6 dB in the whole operating frequency band. Compared with the results shown in Figure 6, approximately 2.5 dB of F/B ratio is increased due to the outer metallic strip. For most of the frequency band (2.29–4.35 GHz), the measured radiation efficiency of type B antenna is also around 80%. The radiation efficiency is almost not changed compared with that of the reference antenna in [12].Figure 14
Measured F/B ratios and radiation efficiency of type B antenna.In order to further illustrate the performances of the improved antennas, Table1 shows the comparisons among the designed antennas (type A and type B) and the reference antennas in [11, 12] in terms of bandwidth, antenna gain, front-to-back ratio, and the antenna sizes. According to the Table 1, the reference antenna shown in [11] has 40.6% impedance bandwidth. The gain of this antenna is better than 3.3 dBi within the operating frequency range. When a new additional strip is added to the director strip as in [12], although the bandwidth is further improved and a 63.1% measured bandwidth ranging from 2.29 to 4.4 GHz is achieved, the front-to-back ratio of the antenna is reduced. In order to overcome this problem, two closely spaced metallic strips were adopted as a new reflector to improve the F/B ratio of the antenna. Therefore, two arrangement modes of the improved antennas named type A and type B are designed and measured. The measured results of the two improved designs are also listed in Table 1. According to specifications in Table 1, the impedance bandwidth of type A antenna is about 62.5% ranging from 2.3 to 4.39 GHz, which is approximately equal to the reference antenna in [12]. However, about 0.3 dB of gain and 2 dB of F/B ratio are improved. Type B antenna can realize a 62% impedance bandwidth ranging from 2.29 to 4.35 GHz. Although the gain of type B antenna is about 3.4 dBi to 4.9 dBi, which is approximately equal to the reference antenna in [12], type B antenna achieved a higher F/B ratio better than 10.6 dB. Compared with that of the reference antenna in [12], the directivity of type B antenna is greatly improved. Thus, the effectiveness of adopting two closely spaced metallic strips to improve the antenna directivity is verified by using the measured results of the two fabricated antennas. In addition, the F/B ratios of the two fabricated antennas are both improved and better than 10 dB without changing the overall dimensions and the operating frequency.Table 1
Performance comparison between different antennas.
AntennasRef. [11]Ref. [12]Type AType BBandwidth (GHz)2.29–3.462.29–4.42.3–4.392.29–4.35Realized gain (dBi)3.3–4.83.5–4.93.8–5.23.4–4.9F/B ratio (dB)≥ 10≥ 8.1≥ 10.1≥ 10.6Sub. sizes (mm2)60 × 5060 × 5060 × 5060 × 50Ant. Struc. (mm2)38 × 2438 × 2838 × 2843 × 30.5


## 4. Conclusions

For the printed rectangular loop antenna with two gaps, the impendence matching is improved owing to the new metallic strips added to the main radiation direction. Because of the drawback of narrow characteristics of single strip, the single bent strip at the bottom of antenna cannot provide the wideband reflection capability. Then, the antenna directivity is not good. In this paper, the directivity of the broadband printed unidirectional antenna is improved by using two closely spaced metallic strips as a new reflector to provide wideband reflection capability. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the above method, two arrangement modes of the two closely spaced strips as reflector are investigated, fabricated, and measured. According to the measurements results, the bandwidth of type A antenna is about 62.5% ranging from 2.3 to 4.39 GHz with about 0.3 dB improvement of the gain and 2 dB improvement of the F/B ratio. The realized gain is about 3.8–5.2 dBi. Type B antenna can realize a 62% measured bandwidth ranging from 2.29 to 4.35 GHz and the gain of 3.4–4.9 dBi with a higher F/B ratio better than 10.6 dB. Measurement results show that the two closely spaced metallic strips can provide a wideband reflection capability for improving the antenna directivity. The F/B ratios of the two antenna arrangement modes are both better than 10 dB within the operating frequency band without changing the operating frequency.



---

*Source: 3389729-2021-10-07.xml*