# Antidermatophytic Activity of Ethanolic Extract fromCroton tiglium

Authors: Han Chien Lin; Yu-Liang Kuo; Wen-Ju Lee; Hui-Yi Yap; Shao-Hung Wang
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Dermatophytosis, which is caused mainly by genera ofTrichophyton, Epidermophyton, and Microsporum, is a frequent dermatological problem in tropical and subtropical countries. Investigations were carried out in this study to evaluate the antidermatophytic activity of the stems, leaves, and seeds of Croton tiglium, one of the traditional medicine plants indigenous to Asia. Ethanolic extracts of the stems, leaves, and seeds of C. tiglium were prepared by cold soak or heat reflux methods. The antidermatophytic activities of the extracts were evaluated by disc diffusion and microdilution susceptibility assays against Trichophyton mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, and Epidermophyton floccosum. The active components in the extracts were analyzed and identified by GC-MS. All ethanolic extracts of C. tiglium showed some antifungal activities against the three dermatophytes. The ethanolic stem extract had the greatest inhibitory activities against T. mentagrophytes and E. floccosum with MICs at 0.16 mg/mL and had a lower activity against T. rubrum (MIC: 0.31 mg/mL). Oleic acid and hexadecanoic acid were found to be the major constituents in the stem extract that demonstrated strong antidermatophytic activities. The ethanolic extracts of stem or seed of C. tiglium exhibit strong antidermatophytic activities and, thus, could be considered for application on treating skin fungal infections after appropriate processing.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Fungal infections of the skin and nails are common in humans and are caused mostly by dermatophytes. A microbiological surveillance demonstrated that molds actually account for a quarter of skin fungal pathogens in hospitalized fever patients in central Taiwan [1]. While the causative agents vary in species geographically,T. mentagrophytes,T. rubrum, andE. floccosum are the most common anthropophilic dermatophytes in Taiwan [2, 3]. Essential oils or organic extracts from plants have been reported with antidermatophytic activity, includingAbies holophylla,Angelica major,Alpinia speciosa,Artemisia sieberi,Baccharis trimera,Chamaecyparis obtusa,Cinnamomum zeylanicum,Cymbopogon citratus,Eucalyptus smithii,Eugenia uniflora,Foeniculum vulgare,Ocimum gratissimum, Mentha piperita,Moringa oleifera,Olea europaea,Prunus armeniaca,Prunus dulcis, andThymus schimperi [3–13].Croton tiglium L. (Euphorbiaceae) is a medicinal plant that is indigenous to China, India, and Southeast Asia [14]. Seeds, leaves, bark, and root ofC. tiglium are used in traditional medicine to ease various illnesses, including dropsy, obstinate constipation, intestinal obstruction, lead poisoning, and high blood pressure [15]. Moreover, extracts ofC. tiglium have been reported possessing antimicrobial activities. The tested microorganisms includeBacillus subtilis,Escherichia coli,Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Pasteurella multocida,Staphylococcus epidermidis,S. aureus,Aspergillus niger,Candida albicans,Microsporum canis,Mucor mucedo, andTrichophyton rubrum [16–20]. Croton oil, prepared from the seeds ofC. tiglium, was used to treat some skin diseases, including ringworm [21, 22]. To find whetherC. tiglium has antidermatophytic activity, we extracted stems, leaves, and seeds of the plant separately and analyzed the possible active components after the extracts were further resolved by gas-chromatography (GC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS).


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Extraction ofCroton tiglium

Stems, leaves, and seeds ofCroton tiglium L. taken from the plants at Fanlu countryside, Chiayi county, Taiwan, were crushed and grinded. The powder was then extracted with ethanol either by cold soak or by heat reflux. In the cold soak method, 95% ethanol at a 10 : 1 weight ratio was used to soak the powder in dark at room temperature for 48 h. On the other hand of using heat reflux, the mixture of ethanol and powder was boiled and refluxed for 2 h in a flask equipped with a condenser. The filtrates (Advantec number 1) were concentrated and dried at 40°C in a rotary evaporator (Laborota 4000, Heidolph, Germany). After dissolving in a minimum amount of dimethyl sulfoxide, these extracts were used for the initial bioassay.Additional dried ethanolic extracts were subjected to water and ethyl acetate partition (1 : 1) at room temperature. The ethyl acetate soluble fraction and the ethyl acetate insoluble but water soluble fraction were concentrated and dried at 40°C.


### 2.2. Fungal Strains and Culture Conditions

The dermatophytes used for experimental controls in this study were obtained from the Food Industry Research and Development Institute in Taiwan.Trichophyton mentagrophytes (BCRC 32066),T. rubrum (BCRC 32805), andEpidermophyton floccosum (BCRC 30531) were regularly cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agars (SDA; Difco) at 25°C. RPMI-1640 (Sigma) buffered to pH 7.0 with MOPS was used for the broth microdilution susceptibility assay, to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Amphotericin B (AMB; Sigma) was used as a positive control for antifungal activity. All the works were performed in biosafety level-2 (P2) facility. The protocol and the procedures of the study were approved by the National Chiayi University Biosafety Committee.


### 2.3. Antifungal Disc Diffusion Susceptibility Testing

Stock fungal conidia were prepared from 15-day-old colonies grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Difco) and suspended in sterile saline as a stock. SDA plates were streaked evenly with 0.5-McFarland inoculums. Samples to be tested were dissolved appropriately, and 10μL of the solution was applied to sterile paper discs (ADVANTEC), 8 mm in diameter, and air dried. The discs were then applied to the surfaces of inoculated plates. Plates were incubated at 25°C for 48 h, and the diameters of the inhibition zone were measured.


### 2.4. Susceptibility Assay by Broth Microdilution

MICs of the samples were determined alternatively by the broth microdilution method using serially diluted extract samples. In brief, each microdilution well that contained 100μL of the MOPS-buffered RPMI-diluted extract received an equal volume of 50-fold diluted conidia stock. The well-containing plates were incubated at 25°C for 48 h. After incubation, the plates were examined visually, and the MIC for the assayed sample was the lowest extract concentration showing no apparent growth of the target microorganism.


### 2.5. Identification of Components in the Ethyl Acetate Soluble Fractions

To analyze the components in the ethyl acetate soluble fractions of theC. tiglium, GC-MS (Agilent model 6890 GC with model 5973 MSD) was applied. To DB-5ms column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 μm film thickness), 1 μL sample was injected. The oven temperature was set initially at 40°C for 1 min, followed by an increment of 4°C/min up to 180°C, then by an increase of 15°C/min up to 260°C, and then by keeping at 260°C for 10 min; the injector was set at 270°C with helium as the carrier gas (1 mL/min). The split valve was opened with a split ratio of 1 : 50 and the ionization energy was 70 eV. Spectra were scanned from 45 to 425 m/z. Volatile compounds were identified by comparing the mass spectra with the data system libraries (Wiley/NBS and NIST) and by Kovats indices (KI) estimated in accordance with modified Kovats method [23]. The relative percentages of individual compounds were calculated from the corresponding peak areas.


### 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Experimental measurements were carried out in triplicate. All values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison test using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS). Differences were considered statistically significant whenp
<
0
.
05.


## 2.1. Extraction ofCroton tiglium

Stems, leaves, and seeds ofCroton tiglium L. taken from the plants at Fanlu countryside, Chiayi county, Taiwan, were crushed and grinded. The powder was then extracted with ethanol either by cold soak or by heat reflux. In the cold soak method, 95% ethanol at a 10 : 1 weight ratio was used to soak the powder in dark at room temperature for 48 h. On the other hand of using heat reflux, the mixture of ethanol and powder was boiled and refluxed for 2 h in a flask equipped with a condenser. The filtrates (Advantec number 1) were concentrated and dried at 40°C in a rotary evaporator (Laborota 4000, Heidolph, Germany). After dissolving in a minimum amount of dimethyl sulfoxide, these extracts were used for the initial bioassay.Additional dried ethanolic extracts were subjected to water and ethyl acetate partition (1 : 1) at room temperature. The ethyl acetate soluble fraction and the ethyl acetate insoluble but water soluble fraction were concentrated and dried at 40°C.


## 2.2. Fungal Strains and Culture Conditions

The dermatophytes used for experimental controls in this study were obtained from the Food Industry Research and Development Institute in Taiwan.Trichophyton mentagrophytes (BCRC 32066),T. rubrum (BCRC 32805), andEpidermophyton floccosum (BCRC 30531) were regularly cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agars (SDA; Difco) at 25°C. RPMI-1640 (Sigma) buffered to pH 7.0 with MOPS was used for the broth microdilution susceptibility assay, to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Amphotericin B (AMB; Sigma) was used as a positive control for antifungal activity. All the works were performed in biosafety level-2 (P2) facility. The protocol and the procedures of the study were approved by the National Chiayi University Biosafety Committee.


## 2.3. Antifungal Disc Diffusion Susceptibility Testing

Stock fungal conidia were prepared from 15-day-old colonies grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Difco) and suspended in sterile saline as a stock. SDA plates were streaked evenly with 0.5-McFarland inoculums. Samples to be tested were dissolved appropriately, and 10μL of the solution was applied to sterile paper discs (ADVANTEC), 8 mm in diameter, and air dried. The discs were then applied to the surfaces of inoculated plates. Plates were incubated at 25°C for 48 h, and the diameters of the inhibition zone were measured.


## 2.4. Susceptibility Assay by Broth Microdilution

MICs of the samples were determined alternatively by the broth microdilution method using serially diluted extract samples. In brief, each microdilution well that contained 100μL of the MOPS-buffered RPMI-diluted extract received an equal volume of 50-fold diluted conidia stock. The well-containing plates were incubated at 25°C for 48 h. After incubation, the plates were examined visually, and the MIC for the assayed sample was the lowest extract concentration showing no apparent growth of the target microorganism.


## 2.5. Identification of Components in the Ethyl Acetate Soluble Fractions

To analyze the components in the ethyl acetate soluble fractions of theC. tiglium, GC-MS (Agilent model 6890 GC with model 5973 MSD) was applied. To DB-5ms column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 μm film thickness), 1 μL sample was injected. The oven temperature was set initially at 40°C for 1 min, followed by an increment of 4°C/min up to 180°C, then by an increase of 15°C/min up to 260°C, and then by keeping at 260°C for 10 min; the injector was set at 270°C with helium as the carrier gas (1 mL/min). The split valve was opened with a split ratio of 1 : 50 and the ionization energy was 70 eV. Spectra were scanned from 45 to 425 m/z. Volatile compounds were identified by comparing the mass spectra with the data system libraries (Wiley/NBS and NIST) and by Kovats indices (KI) estimated in accordance with modified Kovats method [23]. The relative percentages of individual compounds were calculated from the corresponding peak areas.


## 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Experimental measurements were carried out in triplicate. All values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison test using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS). Differences were considered statistically significant whenp
<
0
.
05.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Antidermatophytic Activity of Ethanolic Extract fromCroton tiglium

Three most common dermatophytes in Taiwan, that is,T. mentagrophytes,T. rubrum, andE. floccosum, were used for testing the antifungal activity ofC. tiglium extracts in this study (Tables 1–3). By using disc diffusion method, we demonstrated that both heat reflux and cold soak fractions of the ethanolic stem extract ofC. tiglium had inhibitory activities againstT. mentagrophytes (Table 1) andE. floccosum (Table 3) in a dose-dependent manner.T. rubrum is less sensitive to all of the extracts. However, when the heat reflux extract was used at 10 μg (Table 2), a clear zone can be seen. The heat reflux or the cold soak fractions ofC. tiglium seeds showed a weak but noteworthy inhibition againstT. mentagrophytes (Table 1) andE. floccosum (Table 3). It is conclusively seen that using the heat reflux method to extract stems ofC. tiglium yielded the highest inhibition activity to the three dermatophytes among all preparations (Tables 1 and 3).Table 1
Antifungal activity ofCroton tiglium ethanolic extracts against Trichophyton mentagrophytes by the disc diffusion method∗.
Specimen
Stem
Leave
Seed
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Extract
10μg
11.1 ± 0.4z
a
8.7 ± 0.3x
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
9.5 ± 0.4y
a
9.1 ± 0.3x
y
a
50μg
14.0 ± 0.4y
b
11.7 ± 0.2x
b
9.6 ± 0.3w
b
8.7 ± 0.5w
a
13.0 ± 0.6y
b
11.7 ± 0.6x
b
250μg
17.0 ± 0.2z
c
14.2 ± 0.6y
c
12.5 ± 0.2x
c
11.1 ± 0.2w
b
16.1 ± 0.8z
c
14.4 ± 0.7y
c
500μg
18.1 ± 0.4y
d
15.2 ± 0.4x
d
13.4 ± 0.1w
d
12.4 ± 0.8w
c
17.3 ± 0.7y
c
15.4 ± 0.8x
c
AMB (10μg)
21.3 ± 0.2e
∗The fungal spores were plated on SDA plates with the extracts or amphotericin B (AMB) absorbed on 8 mm filter paper discs. Duncan’s multiple range test (p
<
0.05) was used to statistically evaluate the difference in the diameters (mm) of inhibition zones. The letters “a, b, c, d, and e” indicated significant differences between groups treated with different amounts of the extracts. The letters “w, x, y, and z” indicate statistical differences among the extraction groups.Table 2
Antifungal activity ofCroton tiglium ethanolic extracts against Trichophyton rubrum by the disc diffusion method∗.
Specimen
Stem
Leave
Seed
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Extract
10μg
9.8 ± 0.5x
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
50μg
13.9 ± 0.1y
b
10.1 ± 0.4x
b
8.9 ± 0.2w
b
9.9 ± 0.2w
x
b
10.0 ± 0.2x
b
10.0 ± 1.0x
b
250μg
16.8 ± 0.1y
c
12.5 ± 0.3x
c
10.5 ± 0.2w
c
12.3 ± 0.1x
c
12.9 ± 0.4x
c
12.7 ± 0.9x
c
500μg
17.7 ± 0.5y
d
13.5 ± 0.21x
d
11.8 ± 0.1w
d
13.0 ± 0.2x
d
13.8 ± 0.6x
d
13.4 ± 0.5x
c
AMB (10μg)
20.2 ± 0.2e
∗The notes are the same as those in Table 1.Table 3
Antifungal activity ofCroton tiglium ethanolic extracts against Epidermophyton floccosum by the disc diffusion method∗.
Specimen
Stem
Leave
Seed
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Extract
10μg
12.04 ± 0.65w
a
10.08 ± 0.41x
a
8.50 ± 0.35v
w
a
8.00 ± 0.00v
a
8.88 ± 0.27w
a
8.00 ± 0.00v
a
50μg
15.08 ± 0.72x
b
13.88 ± 0.53w
x
b
10.29 ± 1.10v
b
9.42 ± 0.24v
b
12.79 ± 0.60w
b
10.79 ± 0.06v
b
250μg
17.50 ± 0.20z
c
16.08 ± 0.33y
c
12.42 ± 0.36v
c
13.50 ± 0.35w
c
15.17 ± 0.24x
c
13.92 ± 0.31w
c
500μg
18.29 ± 0.29x
c
17.08 ± 0.46w
c
15.04 ± 0.91v
d
14.25 ± 0.54v
c
16.38 ± 0.18w
d
14.92 ± 0.51v
d
AMB (10μg)
21.4 ± 0.1e
∗The notes are the same as those in Table 1.To determine the MICs of those extracts against the three dermatophytes, broth microdilution susceptibility was performed. The smallest values of MIC of the preparedC. tiglium extracts againstT. mentagrophytes,T. rubrum, andE. floccosum were 0.16 mg/mL, 0.31 mg/mL, and 0.16 mg/mL, respectively. They were all obtained from the heat reflux-derived extracts of stem (Table 4), an observation that was consistent with the inhibitory results using disc diffusion method (Tables 1 and 3).Table 4
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (mg/mL) ofCroton tiglium ethanolic extracts against dermatophytes.
Specimen
T. mentagrophytes
T. rubrum
E. floccosum
Stem
Heat reflux
0.16
0.31
0.16
Cold soak
0.63
1.25
0.31
Leave
Heat reflux
1.25
2.50
0.63
Cold soak
2.50
1.25
1.25
Seed
Heat reflux
0.31
1.25
0.63
Cold soak
0.63
1.25
1.25


### 3.2. Antidermatophytic Activity of the Ethyl Acetate Fractions fromCroton tiglium Ethanolic Extracts

To analyze the antidermatophytic ingredients in the extracts ofC. tiglium, the preparations were partitioned with water and ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate soluble parts, but not the water soluble fraction (i.e., ethyl acetate insoluble fractions), readily possessed antidermatophytic activity (Table 5). Moreover, the values of MIC measured for the ethyl acetate soluble fractions were all smaller than the original nonpartitioned ones (Tables 4 and 5). Among them, those ethyl acetate extracts from the heat reflux of theC. tiglium stem showed the strongest antidermatophytic activity (Table 5) with the values of MIC againstT. mentagrophytes,T. rubrum, andE. floccosum at 0.08 mg/mL, 0.16 mg/mL, and 0.04 mg/mL, respectively. Second to the stem preparations, the counterparts prepared from the heat reflux seed showed MIC strengths at 0.16 mg/mL, 0.31 mg/mL, and 0.16 mg/mL, respectively (Table 5). Those from the leaves yielded the least inhibitory activities.Table 5
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (mg/mL) against dermatophytes of the ethyl acetate fraction of theCroton tiglium ethanolic extracts∗.
Specimen
T. mentagrophytes
T. rubrum
E. floccosum
Stem
Heat reflux
0.08
0.16
0.04
Cold soak
0.31
0.63
0.16
Leave
Heat reflux
0.63
1.25
0.31
Cold soak
1.25
0.63
0.63
Seed
Heat reflux
0.16
0.31
0.16
Cold soak
0.31
0.63
0.31
∗All ethyl acetate insoluble (water soluble) fractions gave MIC values greater than 5 mg/mL.


### 3.3. Component Identification of the Ethyl Acetate-Partitioned, Heat Reflux Ethanolic Extracts fromC. tiglium

To examine what compounds within theC. tiglium extracts have the antidermatophytic activities, the final ethyl acetate preparations from the heat reflux ethanolic extracts ofC. tiglium stem and seed were separately subjected to GC-MS analysis. In the GC profiles, any peak with a volume higher than 1% of the total peak areas was examined and their components were identified by matching to the built-in data. Table 6 shows ten major components in the stem extract while showing eight components in the seed preparation. Among the ten major components in the stem extract, one (hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester) was also detected abundantly in the seed extract. The top four abundant compounds in the stem extract were oleic acid, ethyl ester (20.87%), hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid, 20.77%), hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester (14.11%), and oleic acid (14.04%).Table 6
GC-MS identification of ethyl acetate soluble components of the heat reflux ethanolic extracts fromCroton tiglium.
Compound identification
Stem
Seed
Esters
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
5.23∗
—
Decanoic acid, ethyl ester
—
6.44
Dodecanoic acid, ethyl ester
—
5.74
Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester
14.11
17.78
Tetradecanoic acid, ethyl ester
—
4.39
15-Methyl-11-hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester
1.87
—
Heptadecanoic acid, ethyl ester
—
0.95
Linoleic acid, ethyl ester
—
35.90
Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester
5.56
24.47
Oleic acid, ethyl ester
20.87
—
Alcohols
Stigmasterol
—
4.33
Acids
Hexadecanoic acid
20.77
—
Oleic acid
14.04
—
Alkanes
Dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane
2.68
—
Eicosane
7.90
—
Tetradecamethyl-cycloheptasiloxane
1.49
—
∗Numbers indicate the percentages of each GC-MS peak. Those peaks with percentages less than 1% were omitted.


### 3.4. Antidermatophytic Activity of Oleic Acid

Since the major chemicals identified in the ethyl acetate extracts ofC. tiglium stem and seed were long-chain organic acids or their esters (Table 6), we tested the top four major components found in the ethyl acetate-stem extract for their possible antifungal activities by the microdilution method, after balancing the pH values. The results in Table 7 show that oleic acid (MIC: 0.08–0.31 mg/mL) is the most active one, followed by hexadecanoic acid (MIC: 0.16–0.31 mg/mL), against the three common dermatophytes. In contrast, their ethyl esters showed less active (oleic acid, ethyl ester with MIC at 0.63 to >5 mg/mL) or negligible activities (hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester with MIC at >5 mg/mL). As aforementioned,T. rubrum displayed less sensitivity to those compounds than the other two fungi.Table 7
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (mg/mL) against dermatophytes of the major components of theCroton tiglium stem heat reflux extracts.
T. mentagrophytes
T. rubrum
E. floccosum
Oleic acid
0.08
0.31
0.08
Hexadecanoic acid
0.31
0.31
0.16
Oleate, ethyl ester
2.5
>5
0.63
Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester
>5
>5
>5


## 3.1. Antidermatophytic Activity of Ethanolic Extract fromCroton tiglium

Three most common dermatophytes in Taiwan, that is,T. mentagrophytes,T. rubrum, andE. floccosum, were used for testing the antifungal activity ofC. tiglium extracts in this study (Tables 1–3). By using disc diffusion method, we demonstrated that both heat reflux and cold soak fractions of the ethanolic stem extract ofC. tiglium had inhibitory activities againstT. mentagrophytes (Table 1) andE. floccosum (Table 3) in a dose-dependent manner.T. rubrum is less sensitive to all of the extracts. However, when the heat reflux extract was used at 10 μg (Table 2), a clear zone can be seen. The heat reflux or the cold soak fractions ofC. tiglium seeds showed a weak but noteworthy inhibition againstT. mentagrophytes (Table 1) andE. floccosum (Table 3). It is conclusively seen that using the heat reflux method to extract stems ofC. tiglium yielded the highest inhibition activity to the three dermatophytes among all preparations (Tables 1 and 3).Table 1
Antifungal activity ofCroton tiglium ethanolic extracts against Trichophyton mentagrophytes by the disc diffusion method∗.
Specimen
Stem
Leave
Seed
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Extract
10μg
11.1 ± 0.4z
a
8.7 ± 0.3x
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
9.5 ± 0.4y
a
9.1 ± 0.3x
y
a
50μg
14.0 ± 0.4y
b
11.7 ± 0.2x
b
9.6 ± 0.3w
b
8.7 ± 0.5w
a
13.0 ± 0.6y
b
11.7 ± 0.6x
b
250μg
17.0 ± 0.2z
c
14.2 ± 0.6y
c
12.5 ± 0.2x
c
11.1 ± 0.2w
b
16.1 ± 0.8z
c
14.4 ± 0.7y
c
500μg
18.1 ± 0.4y
d
15.2 ± 0.4x
d
13.4 ± 0.1w
d
12.4 ± 0.8w
c
17.3 ± 0.7y
c
15.4 ± 0.8x
c
AMB (10μg)
21.3 ± 0.2e
∗The fungal spores were plated on SDA plates with the extracts or amphotericin B (AMB) absorbed on 8 mm filter paper discs. Duncan’s multiple range test (p
<
0.05) was used to statistically evaluate the difference in the diameters (mm) of inhibition zones. The letters “a, b, c, d, and e” indicated significant differences between groups treated with different amounts of the extracts. The letters “w, x, y, and z” indicate statistical differences among the extraction groups.Table 2
Antifungal activity ofCroton tiglium ethanolic extracts against Trichophyton rubrum by the disc diffusion method∗.
Specimen
Stem
Leave
Seed
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Extract
10μg
9.8 ± 0.5x
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
8.0 ± 0.0w
a
50μg
13.9 ± 0.1y
b
10.1 ± 0.4x
b
8.9 ± 0.2w
b
9.9 ± 0.2w
x
b
10.0 ± 0.2x
b
10.0 ± 1.0x
b
250μg
16.8 ± 0.1y
c
12.5 ± 0.3x
c
10.5 ± 0.2w
c
12.3 ± 0.1x
c
12.9 ± 0.4x
c
12.7 ± 0.9x
c
500μg
17.7 ± 0.5y
d
13.5 ± 0.21x
d
11.8 ± 0.1w
d
13.0 ± 0.2x
d
13.8 ± 0.6x
d
13.4 ± 0.5x
c
AMB (10μg)
20.2 ± 0.2e
∗The notes are the same as those in Table 1.Table 3
Antifungal activity ofCroton tiglium ethanolic extracts against Epidermophyton floccosum by the disc diffusion method∗.
Specimen
Stem
Leave
Seed
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Heat reflux
Cold soak
Extract
10μg
12.04 ± 0.65w
a
10.08 ± 0.41x
a
8.50 ± 0.35v
w
a
8.00 ± 0.00v
a
8.88 ± 0.27w
a
8.00 ± 0.00v
a
50μg
15.08 ± 0.72x
b
13.88 ± 0.53w
x
b
10.29 ± 1.10v
b
9.42 ± 0.24v
b
12.79 ± 0.60w
b
10.79 ± 0.06v
b
250μg
17.50 ± 0.20z
c
16.08 ± 0.33y
c
12.42 ± 0.36v
c
13.50 ± 0.35w
c
15.17 ± 0.24x
c
13.92 ± 0.31w
c
500μg
18.29 ± 0.29x
c
17.08 ± 0.46w
c
15.04 ± 0.91v
d
14.25 ± 0.54v
c
16.38 ± 0.18w
d
14.92 ± 0.51v
d
AMB (10μg)
21.4 ± 0.1e
∗The notes are the same as those in Table 1.To determine the MICs of those extracts against the three dermatophytes, broth microdilution susceptibility was performed. The smallest values of MIC of the preparedC. tiglium extracts againstT. mentagrophytes,T. rubrum, andE. floccosum were 0.16 mg/mL, 0.31 mg/mL, and 0.16 mg/mL, respectively. They were all obtained from the heat reflux-derived extracts of stem (Table 4), an observation that was consistent with the inhibitory results using disc diffusion method (Tables 1 and 3).Table 4
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (mg/mL) ofCroton tiglium ethanolic extracts against dermatophytes.
Specimen
T. mentagrophytes
T. rubrum
E. floccosum
Stem
Heat reflux
0.16
0.31
0.16
Cold soak
0.63
1.25
0.31
Leave
Heat reflux
1.25
2.50
0.63
Cold soak
2.50
1.25
1.25
Seed
Heat reflux
0.31
1.25
0.63
Cold soak
0.63
1.25
1.25


## 3.2. Antidermatophytic Activity of the Ethyl Acetate Fractions fromCroton tiglium Ethanolic Extracts

To analyze the antidermatophytic ingredients in the extracts ofC. tiglium, the preparations were partitioned with water and ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate soluble parts, but not the water soluble fraction (i.e., ethyl acetate insoluble fractions), readily possessed antidermatophytic activity (Table 5). Moreover, the values of MIC measured for the ethyl acetate soluble fractions were all smaller than the original nonpartitioned ones (Tables 4 and 5). Among them, those ethyl acetate extracts from the heat reflux of theC. tiglium stem showed the strongest antidermatophytic activity (Table 5) with the values of MIC againstT. mentagrophytes,T. rubrum, andE. floccosum at 0.08 mg/mL, 0.16 mg/mL, and 0.04 mg/mL, respectively. Second to the stem preparations, the counterparts prepared from the heat reflux seed showed MIC strengths at 0.16 mg/mL, 0.31 mg/mL, and 0.16 mg/mL, respectively (Table 5). Those from the leaves yielded the least inhibitory activities.Table 5
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (mg/mL) against dermatophytes of the ethyl acetate fraction of theCroton tiglium ethanolic extracts∗.
Specimen
T. mentagrophytes
T. rubrum
E. floccosum
Stem
Heat reflux
0.08
0.16
0.04
Cold soak
0.31
0.63
0.16
Leave
Heat reflux
0.63
1.25
0.31
Cold soak
1.25
0.63
0.63
Seed
Heat reflux
0.16
0.31
0.16
Cold soak
0.31
0.63
0.31
∗All ethyl acetate insoluble (water soluble) fractions gave MIC values greater than 5 mg/mL.


## 3.3. Component Identification of the Ethyl Acetate-Partitioned, Heat Reflux Ethanolic Extracts fromC. tiglium

To examine what compounds within theC. tiglium extracts have the antidermatophytic activities, the final ethyl acetate preparations from the heat reflux ethanolic extracts ofC. tiglium stem and seed were separately subjected to GC-MS analysis. In the GC profiles, any peak with a volume higher than 1% of the total peak areas was examined and their components were identified by matching to the built-in data. Table 6 shows ten major components in the stem extract while showing eight components in the seed preparation. Among the ten major components in the stem extract, one (hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester) was also detected abundantly in the seed extract. The top four abundant compounds in the stem extract were oleic acid, ethyl ester (20.87%), hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid, 20.77%), hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester (14.11%), and oleic acid (14.04%).Table 6
GC-MS identification of ethyl acetate soluble components of the heat reflux ethanolic extracts fromCroton tiglium.
Compound identification
Stem
Seed
Esters
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
5.23∗
—
Decanoic acid, ethyl ester
—
6.44
Dodecanoic acid, ethyl ester
—
5.74
Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester
14.11
17.78
Tetradecanoic acid, ethyl ester
—
4.39
15-Methyl-11-hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester
1.87
—
Heptadecanoic acid, ethyl ester
—
0.95
Linoleic acid, ethyl ester
—
35.90
Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester
5.56
24.47
Oleic acid, ethyl ester
20.87
—
Alcohols
Stigmasterol
—
4.33
Acids
Hexadecanoic acid
20.77
—
Oleic acid
14.04
—
Alkanes
Dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane
2.68
—
Eicosane
7.90
—
Tetradecamethyl-cycloheptasiloxane
1.49
—
∗Numbers indicate the percentages of each GC-MS peak. Those peaks with percentages less than 1% were omitted.


## 3.4. Antidermatophytic Activity of Oleic Acid

Since the major chemicals identified in the ethyl acetate extracts ofC. tiglium stem and seed were long-chain organic acids or their esters (Table 6), we tested the top four major components found in the ethyl acetate-stem extract for their possible antifungal activities by the microdilution method, after balancing the pH values. The results in Table 7 show that oleic acid (MIC: 0.08–0.31 mg/mL) is the most active one, followed by hexadecanoic acid (MIC: 0.16–0.31 mg/mL), against the three common dermatophytes. In contrast, their ethyl esters showed less active (oleic acid, ethyl ester with MIC at 0.63 to >5 mg/mL) or negligible activities (hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester with MIC at >5 mg/mL). As aforementioned,T. rubrum displayed less sensitivity to those compounds than the other two fungi.Table 7
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (mg/mL) against dermatophytes of the major components of theCroton tiglium stem heat reflux extracts.
T. mentagrophytes
T. rubrum
E. floccosum
Oleic acid
0.08
0.31
0.08
Hexadecanoic acid
0.31
0.31
0.16
Oleate, ethyl ester
2.5
>5
0.63
Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester
>5
>5
>5


## 4. Discussion

C. tiglium, a plant considered indigenous to Asia, has been used long time for medical purposes. In the present study, we revealed that the ethanolic extract ofC. tiglium did possess strong antifungal activities against dermatophytes, includingT. mentagrophytes,T. rubrum, andE. floccosum. GC-MS analysis revealed that the major components in the stem or seed extracts ofC. tiglium were long-chain organic acids and their ester derivatives. Moreover, we found that oleic acid and hexadecanoic acid of the extracts, but not their ester forms, exhibited strong antidermatophytic activity.In a screening of medicinal plants for the antifungal activity, Jamil et al. found that crude extracts from the leaves and seeds ofC. tiglium were active against Trichocomaceae (Aspergillus niger andA. tamarii) and Mucoraceae (Mucor mucedo andRhizopus solani) [24]. In a separate experiment, Shahid et al. discovered that a 50 kDa protein had good antifungal activity [18]. However, Iraqui and Yadav [19] have discovered the ethanolic or methanolic extracts from seeds ofC. tiglium exhibiting better fungicidal activity againstT. rubrum than the water extracts. Here we consistently found that the portion ofC. tiglium ethanol extract followed by partition into ethyl ester did contain the anti-T. rubrum activities. However, we did not aim at the large molecules solubilized in water. The possible antifungal protein inC. tiglium remains to be confirmed. It is conceivable that ingredients ofC. tiglium against dermatophytes may consist of multiple components.Extracts of leaves fromHelichrysum pedunculatum have been previously proven to be active against Gram-positive bacteria and within the extracts, oleic and linoleic acids are the active constituents. Furthermore, they have synergistic bactericidal activity againstStaphylococcus aureus andMicrococcus kristinae [25]. Linolenic, linoleic, and oleic acids have been demonstrated to exhibit strong activities against some important plant fungal pathogens [26]. In our case ofC. tiglium, high contents of oleic acid and hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid) seem to play a major role in inhibiting three human fungal pathogens. Intriguingly, polyunsaturated fatty acids seem to be more active against dermatophytes than the saturated fatty acid [27] as the effective linoleic (C 18:2), linolenic (C 18:3), and oleic (C 18:1) acids are all unsaturated.


## 5. Conclusion

The ethanolic extracts of stem or seed extracts ofC. tiglium exhibited strong antidermatophytic activities. A topical application of the ethanolic extracts ofC. tiglium on treating skin fungal infection and formulation of the extracts into shampoo or soap may be practical and scientifically sounding.



---

*Source: 3237586-2016-07-03.xml*