# An X-Band Dual-Polarized Vivaldi Antenna with High Isolation

Authors: Denghui Huang; Hu Yang; Yuqing Wu; Fei Zhao
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

An X-band dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna with high isolation is proposed. The procedure of this antenna design includes the conventional Vivaldi antenna with regular slot edge (RSE), the dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna with two Vivaldi antennas which have different feeding point positions in a cross-shaped form, and the two Vivaldi antennas with a galvanic contact in soldering point. By applying the RSE, it reduced the dimensions of the Vivaldi antenna and improved its radiation performance. The modified antenna is fabricated and measured. The measured results show thatS11<-10 dB at the entire X-band for the two Vivaldi antennas. The isolation (S21) between the two feeding ports, which has been improved by applying the different feeding point positions and the galvanic contact in soldering point, is better than 34 dB at X-band. In addition, the cross-polarized discrimination is better than 21 dB for the two Vivaldi antennas, and the measured results also include the gain of two Vivaldi antennas.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The Vivaldi antenna was firstly described by Gibson in 1979 [1] and then developed in an antipodal shape [2]. The Vivaldi antenna has been considered for many radar or communication system applications because it is an ultrawideband device, it has a planar structure, and it is lightweight, of high efficiency, and of high gain. For conventional Vivaldi antennas, the study results show that the electric field vector of the Vivaldi antenna is parallel to the substrate, which is single-linear-polarized on its two major radiation planes.In some modern high-data or very high resolution imaging radar systems, the application of polarization diversity can enhance the efficiency of such systems because the polarization information delivers further information about the target characteristics. So in order to improve the performance of such systems, the antennas are required to have the characteristics of both ultrawideband and dual polarization. The dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna is a good choice which can be used in modern imaging radar systems at X-band. In recent years, many methods have been presented, to implement two orthogonal cases of polarization with Vivaldi antennas. As in [3], the dual-polarized antenna consists of four antipodal Vivaldi antennas and places them along the outer edge. And in [4–6], the dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna array has been presented, and the conventional Vivaldi antenna or all-metal Vivaldi antenna was used as the array element.In [7–11], the dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna is composed of two conventional Vivaldi antennas in a cross-shaped form without galvanic contact, and the isolation (S21) between the two feeding ports is 23 dB in [9] and 25 dB in [7, 10]. The best result is presented in [12], the isolation is better than 30 dB at the entire function frequency band, and for the two Vivaldi antennas, one is ahead of the other, which avoids the antenna feeding lines overlapping each other. Additionally, the published antennas in [7–11] cannot be used as the dual-polarized antenna array element because the width of antenna is larger than a wavelength corresponding to the higher frequency of the operating band, which will lead to antenna array with grating lobe in higher frequency band.In this paper, a modified dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna with good radiation performance and high isolation is designed and measured. On the one hand, the low cut-off frequency of the Vivaldi antenna was extended by RSE which indicates that it can be used as the dual-polarized antenna array element at X-band, and the radiation performance was also improved. On the other hand, we used the different feeding point positions for two Vivaldi antennas instead of the one Vivaldi antenna being ahead of another Vivaldi antenna, and there is a galvanic contact in soldering point between the two Vivaldi antennas. The overall effect is that the high isolation (S21) is better than 34 dB. Additionally, for the two Vivaldi antennas, the measured gain is between 6.4 dB and 12.2 dB at X-band.


## 2. Antenna Design

Figure1 demonstrates the geometry of the dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna elements: Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2. Those antennas with the same RSE are fed by a 2.74 mm microstrip line, and the characteristic impedance of microstrip line can be calculated as 50 Ω in order to match with SMA connector. The thickness of the substrate is 1 mm and its relative permittivity is 2.65. The substrate dimension (LSUB×WSUB) is 60 × 25 mm2.Figure 1
Geometry of the designed antenna elements: Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2. Dimensions are in mm.The inside of the radiation flares for Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2 fits the following exponential curves:(1)y=C1×eα1×x+C2,C1=y1-y2eα1×x1-eα1×x2,C2=y2eα1×x1-y1eα1×x2eα1×x1-eα1×x2.α1=0.052 stands for exponential rate.P1=0,0.6 and P2=40,7.6 stand for the start and end point of exponential curves.According to [12], for the conventional Vivaldi antenna, the radius of the stub limits the upper working frequency and in order to get the best impedance matching, the cavity should keep the same radius as the stub. In [12], it offers a fast way to design wideband Vivaldi antenna except that it takes the position of the feeding or coupling point into account. In this paper, based on the theory of the equivalent circuit of Vivaldi antenna [13], the position of the feeding point has been studied.The network for the equivalent circuit model of the Vivaldi antenna is shown in Figure2. From the coupling point of microstrip to slot-line transmission, the Vivaldi antenna can be equivalent to a microwave network with four ports. As shown in Figure 2, Z0 is the character impedance of the microstrip line and Zstub, Zcavity denote the input impedance of the microstrip open-end and slot short-end, respectively. Zantenna expresses the input impedance of the isolated Vivaldi antenna fed by a slot transmission line from the coupling point.Figure 2
The network for the equivalent circuit of Vivaldi antenna.Based on [13], the input reflection coefficient Γin for port 1 can be given:(2)Γin=Zl-Z0Zl+Z0,where(3)Zl=n2×Re⁡Zantenna×ZcavityZantenna+Zcavity+j×n×Im⁡Zantenna×ZcavityZantenna+Zcavity+Zstuband the coupling coefficient n can be found in [14].For the different feeding or coupling point positionL2, shown in Figure 1, the real and imaginary parts of Zl can be calculated with the simulated input impedance for open-end stub, Zstub, short-end cavity, Zcavity, and the isolated Vivaldi antenna fed by a slot transmission line, Zantenna, shown in Figure 2, and those simulations were also presented in [12].Figure3 shows the real and imaginary parts of Zl with different L2. As the feeding point is closer to the cavity, the smaller variation of the imaginary and real parts of the Zl has been gotten, which indicates that the wider bandwidth for Vivaldi antenna will be obtained. Based on the full-wave electromagnetic model simulation of Vivaldi antenna with different L2, the magnitude of the reflection coefficient with different feeding point position L2 is shown in Figure 4; the simulated results show that the feeding point position is closer to the cavity; the wider frequency band has been gotten, which is in good agreement with the conclusion shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
The real and imaginary parts of theZl.Figure 4
SimulatedS11 for the different feeding point positions.Based on the study of the feeding point position, the Vivaldi antenna element for dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna has been designed. The coupling pointL2 is greater than 3 mm for S11<-10 dB at X-band and the optimal cavity radius is 4 mm, and the radius of the stub is 2.5 mm, with a stub angle of 120°. Moreover, the simulated S11 and gain of Vivaldi antenna with and without RSE are shown in Figure 5. In Figure 5(a), the low cut-off frequency is extended by RSE from 9.6 GHz to 7 GHz without increasing the volume of the antenna, and the gain of Vivaldi antenna is also improved by RSE at X-band in Figure 5(b).Figure 5
The simulatedS11 and gain for Vivaldi antenna with RSE and Vivaldi antenna without RSE.
(a)
(b)For the most common dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna shown in Figure6(a), in order to avoid the feeding lines overlapping each other, Vivaldi 2 is ahead of Vivaldi 1 with d mm. Based on the parameter study of d, which is the distance between Vivaldi 2 and Vivaldi 1, the isolation between two antenna ports is shown in Figure 7(a). The simulated results indicate that the isolation between two ports is better than 24 dB for d=2 mm, while it is better than 29 dB for d=1 mm. As shown in Figure 6(b), we used the different feeding or coupling point position L2 for the two Vivaldi antenna elements instead of Vivaldi 1 being ahead of Vivaldi 2, which avoids the feeding lines overlapping each other. L2 for Vivaldi 1 is 4.1 mm, while L2 is 3.5 mm for Vivaldi 2. The isolation between the two feeding ports is better than 32 dB with d=0 mm.Figure 6
The structure of dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna: (a) conventional dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna; (b) modified dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna.Figure 7
(a) Effect of the differentd on the isolation of two ports. (b) Simulated return loss of Vivaldi 2 and isolation with the different length of galvanic contact.
(a)
(b)Figure7(b) plots the isolation between the two feeding ports with galvanic contact in soldering port shown in Figure 6(b). The length of galvanic contact L1 has an effect on the return loss of Vivaldi 2, and the lower frequency limit is 8.3 GHz when L1 exceeds 3 mm. In this antenna design, in order to complement dual polarization, we place two Vivaldi antennas cross-shaped with different feeding point position, which avoids the feeding lines overlapping each other, and also there is a galvanic contact in soldering point. The overall effect is that the return loss of the two Vivaldi antennas is lower than -10 dB at X-band, and the isolation between the two feeding ports is better than 34 dB with L1=2 mm galvanic contact.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The photograph of modified dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna has been fabricated and measured. Figure8(a) shows the top and bottom view of the constructed Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2. By using the different feeding point positions, the lengths of the slots in Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2 are 16.2 and 43.8 mm, and the summarized length of the slots is equal to the length of antenna, which indicates the 0 mm displacement between Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2. The 0 mm displacement between Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2 also indicates that the separate antennas almost have the same phase center in x-axis although the feeding point of Vivaldi 2 ahead of Vivaldi 1 is 0.6 mm. The width of the slots is 1.1 mm and it is wider than the thickness of the substrate (1 mm), where Vivaldi 1 can be inserted into Vivaldi 2 in a cross-shaped form. The structure of the modified dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna is shown in Figure 8(b). As shown in Figure 8(b), there is a galvanic contact in soldering point and the feeding point of Vivaldi 2 ahead of Vivaldi 1.Figure 8
Photograph of (a) top and bottom view for Vivaldi elements: Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2; (b) modified dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna.
(a)
(b)Figure9 illustrates the measured S-parameters of the dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna. The S-parameters were measured with Agilent Performance Network Analyzer N5230C. As can be seen from Figure 9, the frequency band of S11<-10 dB is 7.4–12 GHz for Vivaldi 1, while it is 7.8–12 GHz for Vivaldi 2, where the frequency band for S11<-10 dB is covering the X-band. In addition, with the help of the different feeding point positions for Vivaldi antennas and the only galvanic contact in soldering point, the isolation between two ports is better than 34 dB at X-band. Compared to the simulated S11 and S22, because the losses of the dielectric and the SMA connector are not taken into account in simulations, the measured S11 and S22 are lower than the simulated results.Figure 9
Simulated and measuredS-parameters of the dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna.Figure10 plots the measured radiation patterns of Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2 at different frequencies for E-plane and H-plane. As shown in Figure 10, both antennas have endfire characteristics with the main lobe in the axial direction (X-direction in Figure 1). And for the two Vivaldi antennas, they have a similar performance within the X-band. Additionally, based on the measured results in Figure 10, the E-plane 3 dB beamwidth for Vivaldi 1 is 63° at 8 GHz, 56° at 10 GHz, and 39° at 12 GHz, while it is 67°at 8 GHz, 51° at 10 GHz, and 35° at 12 GHz for Vivaldi 2. All the results indicate that Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2 have a good radiation performance at the total frequency band.Figure 10
E- and H-plane radiation patterns of the antennas at different frequencies with black solid lines for Vivaldi 1 copolarization, red solid line for Vivaldi 2 copolarization, black short dash line for Vivaldi 1 cross-polarization, and red short dash line for Vivaldi 2 cross-polarization.According to the measured radiation patterns, the measured cross-polarization discrimination versus frequency of Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2 is shown in Figure11. For Vivaldi 1, the cross-polarization discrimination is below 21.9 dB at the X-band and is below 21 dB for Vivaldi 2. In addition, the dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna with good polarization purity can be applied to many radar systems at X-band.Figure 11
Variation of the cross-polarization discrimination for Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2.The gain variation of Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2 at the entire frequency range is shown in Figure12. As shown in Figure 12, the gain of Vivaldi 1 is between 7.4 dB and 11.6 dB at the X-band, while is between 6.4 dB and 12.2 dB at the same frequency band for Vivaldi 2. The gain of the antennas is improved with the increase of the frequency. Compared to Vivaldi 2, Vivaldi 1 has approximately the same gain from 9.2 GHz to 12 GHz, and at 8 GHz, the gain of Vivaldi 1 is 1 dB higher than Vivaldi 2. The difference of the gain between Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2 in lower frequency is mainly caused by the slot behind Vivaldi 2 and the manufacturing error in the two Vivaldi antennas. In addition, those factors also caused the difference on the return loss for Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2 shown in Figure 9. For the two Vivaldi antennas, the measured gain is lower than the simulations, because of the losses of the dielectric.Figure 12
Simulated and measured gain for Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2.


## 4. Conclusion

A modified X-band dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna has been designed and constructed. First, the dimensions of the dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna elements were reduced by RSE. And for the two Vivaldi antennas, the measurements show that the frequency band forS11 < −10 dB is covering the X-band. With the help of the different feeding point positions and the only galvanic contact in soldering point, the high isolation between two antenna ports is better than 34 dB. Additionally, the cross-polarization discrimination for Vivaldi 1 and Vivaldi 2 is below 21 dB, and they both have approximately the same gain at the entire frequency band. Finally, all measurements which support our simulations indicate that the dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna has miniaturized dimensions, high isolation, good radiation performance, and good polarization purity, which can be applied in many imaging radar system applications at X-band.



---

*Source: 3281095-2017-08-24.xml*