# Corporate-Feed Multilayer Bow-Tie Antenna Array  Design Using a Simple Transmission Line Model

Authors: S. Didouh; M. Abri; F. T. Bendimerad
Journal: Modelling and Simulation in Engineering
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

A transmission line model is used to design corporate-fed multilayered bow-tie antennas arrays; the simulated antennas arrays are designed to resonate at the frequencies 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 8 GHz corresponding to RFID, WIFI, and radars applications. The contribution of this paper consists of modeling multilayer bow-tie antenna array fed through an aperture using transmission line model. The transmission line model is simple and precise and allows taking into account the whole geometrical, electrical, and technological characteristics of the antennas arrays. The proposed transmission line model showed its interest in the design of different multilayered bow-tie antennas and predicted the correct resonance frequency for different applications in telecommunications. To validate the proposed transmission line model, the simulation results obtained are compared with those obtained by the method of moments. The results of simulations are presented and discussed. Using this transmission line approach, the resonant frequency, input impedance, and return loss can be determined simultaneously. The paper reports several simulation results that confirm the validity of the developed model. The obtained results are then presented and discussed.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Microstrip antenna arrays are exploited in a vast number of engineering applications due to their ease of manufacturing, low cost, low profile, and light weight [1, 2].Antenna arrays are used to scan the beam of an antenna system, increase the directivity, and perform various other functions which would be difficult with any single element. In the microstrip array, elements can be fed by a single line or by multiple lines in a feed network arrangement. Based on their feeding method [3–5] the array is classified in series-feed network or corporate-feed network.Corporate-feed network is general and versatile because it offers the designer more freedom in controlling the feed of each element (amplitude and phase). Although it leads to performance degradation due to radiation, its constructional simplicity and low cost are still considered. This method has more control of the feed of each element and is ideal for scanning phased arrays, multiband arrays. Thus it provides better directivity as well as radiation efficiency and reduces the beam fluctuations over a band of frequencies compared to the series-feed array. The corporate-feed network is used to provide power splits of2n (i.e., n=2,4,8,16, etc.). This is accomplished by using either tapered lines or using quarter wavelength impedance transformers.In this paper, a transmission line model is used to design corporate-feed multilayer antennas arrays to resonate at the frequencies of 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 8 GHz corresponding to RFID, WIFI, and radars applications, and the patches chosen as radiating elements for these arrays are in the bow-tie shape. The obtained simulation results are compared with those obtained by the moment’s method (MoM).


## 2. Transmission Line Model Analysis

The preferred models for the analysis of microstrip patch antennas are the transmission line model, cavity model, and full wave model (which include primarily integral equations/Moment Method). The transmission line model is the simplest of all and it gives good physical insight, but it is less accurate.In this study, six bow-tie microstrip radiating elements are used to design the corporate-fed array antenna. A bow-tie microstrip radiating patch which is shown in Figure1 can be considered as an open-ended transmission line of length L and width W.Bow-tie antenna and its effective length.
(a)
(b)


## 3. Microstrip Corporated-Feed Array Antenna

The printed array to be considered is one using aperture-coupled bow-tie microstrip patches. The aperture-coupled patch element [4, 6] consists of two substrates, with a ground plane in between. As shown in the geometry for a single aperture-coupled patch in Figure 2, a microstrip feed line is printed on the bottom (feed) substrate, while the patch element is printed on the top (antenna) substrate. Coupling between the feed line and the radiating element is through a small slot in the ground plane below the patch.Figure 2
Configuration of bow-tie antenna fed by aperture coupled.The proposed transmission line equivalent circuit for an aperture coupled bow-tie antennas fed via microstrip line is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Equivalent circuit of the proposed antenna.In this equivalent circuit, two ideal transformers are assumed between the slot ground plane and both sides of the line. The energy is transferred and stored in these two transformers in terms of load susceptance. In fact, all the energy passes the slot aperture and delivers to the patch for radiating. The ratios of these two transformers can be determined using [4]:
(1)n1=LapL,
where Lap  is  the length of the slot.While the second transformation ration2 can be approximated by the expression:
(2)n2=LapW·h,
where h is the thickness of the substrate, the capacitance C is calculated using the following equation as in [7]:
(3)C(ε)=ε0εrAhγnγm+12γn(εreff(εr,h,W)c0Z(εr=1,h,W))-ε0εrAh,(4)γj={1,j=02,j≠0.


## 4. Results and Discussions

The validity of the suggested model is highlighted by comparing the results of the return loss, the input phase, input antenna VSWR, and input impedance locus to those obtained by the moment’s method of the Momentum Software. The simulated antennas arrays are designed to resonate, respectively, at the frequencies 2.4 GHz and 8 GHz.


### 4.1. Bow-Tie Antenna  Array Operating at the Resonant Frequency 2.4 GHz

The configuration of the proposed array is shown in Figure4, which consists of 6 identical bow-tie patch elements in parallel or corporate feed to cover 2.4 GHz operating frequency. The corporate  feed has  a single input port and multiple feed lines in parallel constituting the output ports. Each of these feed lines terminates at an individual radiating element and therefore transfers all its energy into the element.Figure 4
Mask of the multilayered bow-tie antenna array operating at the frequency 2.4 GHz.The antenna array is to be designed on substrate which has a relative permittivityεr of 2.54, a dielectric thickness h of 1.6 mm, and a loss tangent of about 0,019 and 0.05 mm conductor thickness. A rectangular slot with Lap=26 mm and width Wap=2.6 mm is used for coupling the patch to a microstrip line of length Lf=20 mm, etched on substrate which has a relative permittivity εr of 2.54, a dielectric thickness h of 1.6 mm, and a loss tangent of about 0.019 and 0.05 mm conductor thickness.The mask of the multilayer bow-tie antenna array with dimensions is shown in Figure4.The simulated input return loss of multilayer bow-tie antenna array is displayed at the frequency 2.4 GHz in Figure5.Figure 5
Simulated input antenna array return loss.The representation of the reflection coefficient as a function of the resonance frequency is shown by the appearance of several resonance frequencies, which  is a characteristic of the multiband antenna array.The results show the appearance of a resonant mode at the frequency 2.4 GHz and a good agreement by the proposed model and the Momentum software. It appears that a peak of −17.52 dB using transmission line model with a light shift by the moment method provides a return loss of −11.24 dB at the frequency 2.42 GHz.The moments results and those obtained from transmission line model of the input phase of return loss for this antenna array are shown in Figure6.Figure 6
Reflected phase at the antenna array input.From Figure6, both models have the same shape and we note very well that the phase is null by the two models at the resonant frequencies, which means a perfect adaptation.The impedance locus of the antennas array from 1.5 to 3 GHz is illustrated on Smith's chart in Figure7.Figure 7
Smith's chart of the input impedance return losses.It can be seen from Figure7 that both models represent the locations of input impedances in a manner almost identical; this justifies the good agreement between the two models.From Figure8, there is a good agreement between the two models; the level of VSWR is close to unity, implying a good adaptation of the antenna array and precision of the model line transmission.Figure 8
Bow-tie antennas array VSWR.


### 4.2. Bow-Tie Antenna Array Operating at the Resonant Frequency 5 GHz

The selected configuration is shown in Figure9 and consists of six bow-tie identical patches multilayer operating at the resonant frequency 5 GHz.Figure 9
Mask of the multilayered bow-tie antenna array operating at the frequency 5 GHz.The antenna array is to be designed on substrate which has a relative permittivityεr of 2.54, a dielectric thickness h of 1.6 mm, and a loss tangent of about 0,019 and 0.05 mm conductor thickness. A rectangular slot with Lap=18 mm and width Wap=0.6 mm is used for coupling the patch to a microstrip line of length Lf=10 mm, etched on substrate which has a relative permittivity εr of 2.54, a dielectric thickness h of 1.6 mm, and a loss tangent of about 0.019 and 0.05 mm conductor thickness.The multilayer bow-tie antenna array designed with dimensions in millimeter is represented in Figure9.The mask of the multilayer bow-tie antenna array with dimensions is shown in Figure10.Figure 10
Simulated input antenna array return loss.From Figure10, the resonance of antenna array is correctly predicted by both models to be 5 GHz, and as a result we note a peak of about −13.54 dB obtained by transmission line model and of about −19.6 dB by the moment’s method.The moments results and those obtained from transmission line model of the input phase of return loss for this antenna array are shown in Figure11.Figure 11
The antenna array input-reflected phase.The reflected phase is null by the two models in spite of the shift observed by transmission line model.The input impedance locus of the multilayer bow-tie antenna array is illustrated on Smith's chart in Figure12.Figure 12
Smith's chart of the input impedance locus.It is observed that the curves of the two models pass by the axis of 50 Ω. The simulated VSWR is represented on Figure13.Figure 13
Bow-tie antenna array VSWR.According to Figure13, there is good agreement between the two models (transmission line model and the moment method). Around the resonant frequency the VSWR is close to unity implying a good adaptation of the network.


### 4.3. Bow-Tie Antenna  Array Operating at the Resonant Frequency 8 GHz

In this section, other geometry is analyzed by using the method proposed in this paper. The antenna array consists of six bow-tie identical  multilayer patches, as shown in Figure14 and is designed to operate at 8 GHz frequency.Figure 14
Mask of the multilayered bow-tie antenna array operating at the frequency 8 GHz.The antenna array is to be designed on substrate which has a relative permittivityεr of 2.54, a dielectric thickness h of 1.6 mm, and a loss tangent of about 0,019 and 0.05 mm conductor thickness. A rectangular slot with Lap=16 mm and width Wap=2.6 mm is used for coupling the microstrip line of 10 mm length to the patch, etched on a substrate which has a relative permittivity εr of 2.54, a dielectric thickness h of 1.6 mm, and a loss tangent of about 0,019 and 0.05 mm conductor thickness.Figure14 presents the mask layout for multilayer bow-tie antenna array at the resonant frequency 8 GHz.The simulated input return loss of multilayer bow-tie antenna array is displayed at the frequency 8 GHz in Figure15.Figure 15
Simulated input antenna array return loss.From Figure15, it is observed that the resonance of the antenna array is correctly predicted to 8 GHz by the two models. It shows a peak of −19.60 dB using transmission line model and a peak of 12.84 dB by the moment method.The moments results and those obtained from transmission line model of the input phase of return loss for this antenna array are shown in Figure16.Figure 16
The antenna array input-reflected phase.As shown in Figure16, a good agreement between the transmission line model and moment’s method, the simulation results also show that the phase is null by the two models.The impedance locus of the multilayer bow-tie antenna array is illustrated on Smith's chart in Figure17.Figure 17
Smith's chart of the input impedance return losses.The input impedance or the antenna has been calculated over a frequency range of 7.8–8.2 GHz. It can be seen from Figure17 that the curves of the two models pass by the axis of 50 Ω.From Figure18, in the vicinity of the resonant frequency the VSWR is close to the unit which corresponds to an ideal matching.Figure 18
Bow-tie antenna array VSWR.To better illustrate the results obtained in terms of adaptation, the comparison of the results in terms of return loss and resonant frequency between the transmission line model (MLT) and the method of moments (MoM) is summarized in Table1.Table 1
Comparison between transmission line model and method of moments.
Antennas  arrays
Model
Return loss (dB)
Resonant frequency (GHz)
Frequency shift (%)
2.4 GHz (RFID)
MLT
−17.52
2.4
MoM
−11.24
2.42
0.8
%
5 GHz (WIFI)
MLT
−13.54
5
MoM
−19.60
5.01
0.2
%
8 GHz (RADAR)
MLT
−19.60
8
MoM
−12.84
8
0
%Table1 shows that the largest amount of frequency shift is produced by antenna 2.4 GHz which produced a resonance frequency of 2.4 GHz by MLT and 2.42 GHz by MoM, a shift of about 0.8% from 2.4 GHz. The lowest frequency shift is shown by antenna 8 GHz, a shift of about 0% from 8 GHz.The return losses generated by all antennas arrays, which are all in the magnitudes less than −11 dB, show that a good impedance matching has been achieved in both models.


## 4.1. Bow-Tie Antenna  Array Operating at the Resonant Frequency 2.4 GHz

The configuration of the proposed array is shown in Figure4, which consists of 6 identical bow-tie patch elements in parallel or corporate feed to cover 2.4 GHz operating frequency. The corporate  feed has  a single input port and multiple feed lines in parallel constituting the output ports. Each of these feed lines terminates at an individual radiating element and therefore transfers all its energy into the element.Figure 4
Mask of the multilayered bow-tie antenna array operating at the frequency 2.4 GHz.The antenna array is to be designed on substrate which has a relative permittivityεr of 2.54, a dielectric thickness h of 1.6 mm, and a loss tangent of about 0,019 and 0.05 mm conductor thickness. A rectangular slot with Lap=26 mm and width Wap=2.6 mm is used for coupling the patch to a microstrip line of length Lf=20 mm, etched on substrate which has a relative permittivity εr of 2.54, a dielectric thickness h of 1.6 mm, and a loss tangent of about 0.019 and 0.05 mm conductor thickness.The mask of the multilayer bow-tie antenna array with dimensions is shown in Figure4.The simulated input return loss of multilayer bow-tie antenna array is displayed at the frequency 2.4 GHz in Figure5.Figure 5
Simulated input antenna array return loss.The representation of the reflection coefficient as a function of the resonance frequency is shown by the appearance of several resonance frequencies, which  is a characteristic of the multiband antenna array.The results show the appearance of a resonant mode at the frequency 2.4 GHz and a good agreement by the proposed model and the Momentum software. It appears that a peak of −17.52 dB using transmission line model with a light shift by the moment method provides a return loss of −11.24 dB at the frequency 2.42 GHz.The moments results and those obtained from transmission line model of the input phase of return loss for this antenna array are shown in Figure6.Figure 6
Reflected phase at the antenna array input.From Figure6, both models have the same shape and we note very well that the phase is null by the two models at the resonant frequencies, which means a perfect adaptation.The impedance locus of the antennas array from 1.5 to 3 GHz is illustrated on Smith's chart in Figure7.Figure 7
Smith's chart of the input impedance return losses.It can be seen from Figure7 that both models represent the locations of input impedances in a manner almost identical; this justifies the good agreement between the two models.From Figure8, there is a good agreement between the two models; the level of VSWR is close to unity, implying a good adaptation of the antenna array and precision of the model line transmission.Figure 8
Bow-tie antennas array VSWR.


## 4.2. Bow-Tie Antenna Array Operating at the Resonant Frequency 5 GHz

The selected configuration is shown in Figure9 and consists of six bow-tie identical patches multilayer operating at the resonant frequency 5 GHz.Figure 9
Mask of the multilayered bow-tie antenna array operating at the frequency 5 GHz.The antenna array is to be designed on substrate which has a relative permittivityεr of 2.54, a dielectric thickness h of 1.6 mm, and a loss tangent of about 0,019 and 0.05 mm conductor thickness. A rectangular slot with Lap=18 mm and width Wap=0.6 mm is used for coupling the patch to a microstrip line of length Lf=10 mm, etched on substrate which has a relative permittivity εr of 2.54, a dielectric thickness h of 1.6 mm, and a loss tangent of about 0.019 and 0.05 mm conductor thickness.The multilayer bow-tie antenna array designed with dimensions in millimeter is represented in Figure9.The mask of the multilayer bow-tie antenna array with dimensions is shown in Figure10.Figure 10
Simulated input antenna array return loss.From Figure10, the resonance of antenna array is correctly predicted by both models to be 5 GHz, and as a result we note a peak of about −13.54 dB obtained by transmission line model and of about −19.6 dB by the moment’s method.The moments results and those obtained from transmission line model of the input phase of return loss for this antenna array are shown in Figure11.Figure 11
The antenna array input-reflected phase.The reflected phase is null by the two models in spite of the shift observed by transmission line model.The input impedance locus of the multilayer bow-tie antenna array is illustrated on Smith's chart in Figure12.Figure 12
Smith's chart of the input impedance locus.It is observed that the curves of the two models pass by the axis of 50 Ω. The simulated VSWR is represented on Figure13.Figure 13
Bow-tie antenna array VSWR.According to Figure13, there is good agreement between the two models (transmission line model and the moment method). Around the resonant frequency the VSWR is close to unity implying a good adaptation of the network.


## 4.3. Bow-Tie Antenna  Array Operating at the Resonant Frequency 8 GHz

In this section, other geometry is analyzed by using the method proposed in this paper. The antenna array consists of six bow-tie identical  multilayer patches, as shown in Figure14 and is designed to operate at 8 GHz frequency.Figure 14
Mask of the multilayered bow-tie antenna array operating at the frequency 8 GHz.The antenna array is to be designed on substrate which has a relative permittivityεr of 2.54, a dielectric thickness h of 1.6 mm, and a loss tangent of about 0,019 and 0.05 mm conductor thickness. A rectangular slot with Lap=16 mm and width Wap=2.6 mm is used for coupling the microstrip line of 10 mm length to the patch, etched on a substrate which has a relative permittivity εr of 2.54, a dielectric thickness h of 1.6 mm, and a loss tangent of about 0,019 and 0.05 mm conductor thickness.Figure14 presents the mask layout for multilayer bow-tie antenna array at the resonant frequency 8 GHz.The simulated input return loss of multilayer bow-tie antenna array is displayed at the frequency 8 GHz in Figure15.Figure 15
Simulated input antenna array return loss.From Figure15, it is observed that the resonance of the antenna array is correctly predicted to 8 GHz by the two models. It shows a peak of −19.60 dB using transmission line model and a peak of 12.84 dB by the moment method.The moments results and those obtained from transmission line model of the input phase of return loss for this antenna array are shown in Figure16.Figure 16
The antenna array input-reflected phase.As shown in Figure16, a good agreement between the transmission line model and moment’s method, the simulation results also show that the phase is null by the two models.The impedance locus of the multilayer bow-tie antenna array is illustrated on Smith's chart in Figure17.Figure 17
Smith's chart of the input impedance return losses.The input impedance or the antenna has been calculated over a frequency range of 7.8–8.2 GHz. It can be seen from Figure17 that the curves of the two models pass by the axis of 50 Ω.From Figure18, in the vicinity of the resonant frequency the VSWR is close to the unit which corresponds to an ideal matching.Figure 18
Bow-tie antenna array VSWR.To better illustrate the results obtained in terms of adaptation, the comparison of the results in terms of return loss and resonant frequency between the transmission line model (MLT) and the method of moments (MoM) is summarized in Table1.Table 1
Comparison between transmission line model and method of moments.
Antennas  arrays
Model
Return loss (dB)
Resonant frequency (GHz)
Frequency shift (%)
2.4 GHz (RFID)
MLT
−17.52
2.4
MoM
−11.24
2.42
0.8
%
5 GHz (WIFI)
MLT
−13.54
5
MoM
−19.60
5.01
0.2
%
8 GHz (RADAR)
MLT
−19.60
8
MoM
−12.84
8
0
%Table1 shows that the largest amount of frequency shift is produced by antenna 2.4 GHz which produced a resonance frequency of 2.4 GHz by MLT and 2.42 GHz by MoM, a shift of about 0.8% from 2.4 GHz. The lowest frequency shift is shown by antenna 8 GHz, a shift of about 0% from 8 GHz.The return losses generated by all antennas arrays, which are all in the magnitudes less than −11 dB, show that a good impedance matching has been achieved in both models.


## 5. Conclusion

In this paper three multilayered bow-tie antennas arrays have been designed, which consist of 6 identical bowtie patch elements in parallel or corporate feed to resonate at the frequencies 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 8 GHz corresponding to RFID, WIFI, and radars applications using an equivalent circuit. The transmission line model can be successfully used to design the corporate-fed multilayer bow-tie antennas arrays, and even though the model is conceptually simple, it still produces accurate results in a relatively short period of computing time. The proposed transmission line model showed its interest in the design of different multilayered bow-tie antennas arrays feed in parallel, predicting the correct resonance frequency for different applications in telecommunications. The results obtained highlighted a good agreement between the transmission line model and the moment’s method. A comparison of the results produced by the final model with the moment’s method showed the validity of the proposed model.



---

*Source: 327901-2012-12-04.xml*