# Extraction and Characterization of Sugarcane Peel Wax

Authors: Mangesh B. Inarkar; S. S. Lele
Journal: ISRN Agronomy
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Sugarcane peel is an agrowaste product and contains considerable amount of wax. This has a good technoeconomic potential. In view of this, the present study aims at extraction and characterization of wax from sugarcane peel. The yield of crude wax was 0.95% on dry weight basis. During Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) prominent peaks obtained at 2921.73 and 2851.64 (–CH), 1463.44 (–CH2), 1376.96 (–CH3), 1108.4 and 1170.16 (–C–O) 3395.60 (–OH), 1710.25 (–CHO), and 1736.63 (–COOH) indicate presence of alkanes, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, and carboxylic acids, respectively. Alcohol and hydrocarbon fractions were also found by thin layer chromatography (TLC). Melting point of crude wax was observed to be 62.1°C. Molecular weight of wax was estimated to be 1706 Dalton.  Composition of crude wax found using gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) was alkanes (28.83%), ester (66.26%), fatty acids (4.58%), aldehyde (0.11%), and alcohol (0.22%).


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Sugar cane (Saccharum officinarumL.) is one of the industrially important crops mainly grown in Brazil and India. The global production in the year 2009 was reported to be 1900 million tones of which India produced 285 million tones accounting for 14.9% [1]. In India, sugarcane supports one of the largest agro-processing industries and more than 6 million farmers are engaged in its cultivation [2]. According to the Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research (IISR) Vision 2030 report, India is expected to increase sugar cane production to 520 million tones. Sugar industry has many byproducts like bagasse, molasses, press mud, and leaves (trash). Sugarcane wax, a whitish to dark yellowish coating on the surface of sugarcane, gets extracted and separated along with press mud during crushing and processing of the cane juice. This wax portion finds applications in cosmetics, paper coating, textiles, fruit and vegetable coating, leather sizing, lubricants, adhesives, polishes, and pharmaceutical industry [3, 4]. Thus, it can be considered as an alternative to costly carnauba wax, candelilla wax, and chitosan for edible coating applications [5–7]. Sreenivas et al. found ash gourd peel a good source of wax which was used as edible coat for strawberries to enhance their shelf life [8].Wax from press mud has been extracted and characterized in many earlier studies [9, 10]. In India, the process of juice extraction from cane at industrial scale involves the unwashed cane being first shredded, pressed followed by filtration of the muddy juice obtained. As a result, wax gets incorporated in the mud and it needs to be extracted and purified before application. On the other hand, sugar cane peels are first removed and then pressed for the juice in case of juice processed for the retail market. Thus, it was comprehended that if one removes peel before juice processing, extraction of wax would be a much easier and cleaner process. The present study was undertaken with aims of extraction and characterization of the sugarcane peel wax.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Plant Material

Sugarcane peels were collected from some a local juice centre (Figure1). The waste material was oven dried at 60°C for 24 hours. Dried peels were triturated in a mill, packed in polyethylene bags and stored at a dry place for further use. All chemicals used in the study were procured from M/s. Merck Ltd. and M/s. Himedia Ltd., Mumbai, India and were of analytical grade and  HPLC grade.Figure 1
Sugarcane peels collected from local juice centre.


### 2.2. Wax Extraction

Wax was extracted from sugarcane peels as reported by Phukan and Boruah [9]. The process involves soxhlet extraction of peel powder with carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) for 8–10 hours. The solvent was later evaporated using Rota evaporator (Buchi, Switzerland), and the residue primarily contained wax mixtures with some impurities. The residue was dissolved in isopropanol and was refluxed with charcoal for 1-2 hours to remove any undesirable color or pigments present. The extract was then filtered to remove charcoal and evaporated at 60°C to obtain crude wax.


### 2.3.  Analytical Methodologies

#### 2.3.1. Spectrophotometric Analysis

A known quantity of wax (0.1% w/v) was dissolved in hexane for spectroscopic measurement. The solvent was scanned across wavelength of 200 to 700 nm by using Heliosα  spectrophotometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, USA).


#### 2.3.2. Fourier Transform Infrared Analysis

FT-IR spectra of the wax extracts were recorded at 30°C using a Perkin Elmer spectrum 100 model (Perkin Elmer, USA). The FT-IR spectrometer was scanned over the frequency range of 4000–450 cm−1 at a resolution of 8 cm−1. The spectrum was collected by using PE spectrum software.


#### 2.3.3. Thin Layer Chromatography Analysis

The wax extracted was subjected to TLC for separation of its various fractions, such as fatty esters, free fatty alcohols, and free fatty acids [11]. Separations were done on aluminum Silufol UV 254 plates (Merck, Mumbai) coated with silica gel layer of 0.25 mm thickness. Wax dissolved in hexane (0.1% w/v) was applied onto the plates which were developed using the solvent system toluene : acetic acid (99 : 1). The spots were visualized using iodine vapor and scanned immediately at 254 nm.


#### 2.3.4. Physicochemical Parameters

The physicochemical parameters like acid value, iodine value, and saponification value were done according to the AOAC Official Method [12].Molecular weight of the crude wax was determined using gel permeation chromatography (GPC) that was performed with Waters system equipped with a refractive index detector and Waters Styragel column (HR 4THF (7.8 × 300 mm), Waters, MA, USA) [13]. A flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1 and injection volume of 20 μL were used. The analysis was performed with tetrahydrofuran as the mobile phase, and polystyrene standards, covering a broad molar mass range.The thermal characteristics of the wax sample were measured according to the modified method of Athukorala et al. [14] with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC-60; Shimadzu, Japan). The instrument was calibrated for temperature and heat flow with indium metal (mp = 156.6°C,  ΔH=28.71 J g−1). In determining the melting point, a flow of nitrogen gas (40 mL min−1) was purged in the cell and cooled by liquid nitrogen in a refrigerated cooling system. The sample (~5 mg) was weighed in an aluminum pan and placed in the test cell along with a similar empty reference pan. The sample was heated from −20 to 105°C at a rate of 10°C min−1, held at 105°C for 1 min, and cooled to 25°C at −10°C min−1. DSC curves of the last heating cycle were used to determine the melting point range.


#### 2.3.5. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy Analysis

The crude wax (~4 mg) was methylated as mentioned by Athukorala et al. [14]. Crude wax was trimethylsilylated with 200 μL of bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide and 100 μL toluene at 75°C for 30 min. The reaction mixture was cooled and concentrated under nitrogen flush and redissolved in hexane.The analysis was conducted with GC-MS QP 2010 Ultra (Shimadzu, Japan) as mentioned by Deswarte et al. [15]. The GC-MS was equipped with a splitless injector. The capillary column used was Rtx-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 0.1 mm film thickness; Restek). Helium was used as the carrier gas (1.3 mL/min). The temperature of the injector was 300°C. The oven condition was 50°C for 1 min, which was increased by 10°C min−1 to 280°C held for 1 min followed by 5°C min−1 ramping to 320°C and held for 10 min. The data was retrieved by using GC-MS solution software and corresponding identification of peaks was done with the help of NIST library.


## 2.1. Plant Material

Sugarcane peels were collected from some a local juice centre (Figure1). The waste material was oven dried at 60°C for 24 hours. Dried peels were triturated in a mill, packed in polyethylene bags and stored at a dry place for further use. All chemicals used in the study were procured from M/s. Merck Ltd. and M/s. Himedia Ltd., Mumbai, India and were of analytical grade and  HPLC grade.Figure 1
Sugarcane peels collected from local juice centre.


## 2.2. Wax Extraction

Wax was extracted from sugarcane peels as reported by Phukan and Boruah [9]. The process involves soxhlet extraction of peel powder with carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) for 8–10 hours. The solvent was later evaporated using Rota evaporator (Buchi, Switzerland), and the residue primarily contained wax mixtures with some impurities. The residue was dissolved in isopropanol and was refluxed with charcoal for 1-2 hours to remove any undesirable color or pigments present. The extract was then filtered to remove charcoal and evaporated at 60°C to obtain crude wax.


## 2.3.  Analytical Methodologies

### 2.3.1. Spectrophotometric Analysis

A known quantity of wax (0.1% w/v) was dissolved in hexane for spectroscopic measurement. The solvent was scanned across wavelength of 200 to 700 nm by using Heliosα  spectrophotometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, USA).


### 2.3.2. Fourier Transform Infrared Analysis

FT-IR spectra of the wax extracts were recorded at 30°C using a Perkin Elmer spectrum 100 model (Perkin Elmer, USA). The FT-IR spectrometer was scanned over the frequency range of 4000–450 cm−1 at a resolution of 8 cm−1. The spectrum was collected by using PE spectrum software.


### 2.3.3. Thin Layer Chromatography Analysis

The wax extracted was subjected to TLC for separation of its various fractions, such as fatty esters, free fatty alcohols, and free fatty acids [11]. Separations were done on aluminum Silufol UV 254 plates (Merck, Mumbai) coated with silica gel layer of 0.25 mm thickness. Wax dissolved in hexane (0.1% w/v) was applied onto the plates which were developed using the solvent system toluene : acetic acid (99 : 1). The spots were visualized using iodine vapor and scanned immediately at 254 nm.


### 2.3.4. Physicochemical Parameters

The physicochemical parameters like acid value, iodine value, and saponification value were done according to the AOAC Official Method [12].Molecular weight of the crude wax was determined using gel permeation chromatography (GPC) that was performed with Waters system equipped with a refractive index detector and Waters Styragel column (HR 4THF (7.8 × 300 mm), Waters, MA, USA) [13]. A flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1 and injection volume of 20 μL were used. The analysis was performed with tetrahydrofuran as the mobile phase, and polystyrene standards, covering a broad molar mass range.The thermal characteristics of the wax sample were measured according to the modified method of Athukorala et al. [14] with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC-60; Shimadzu, Japan). The instrument was calibrated for temperature and heat flow with indium metal (mp = 156.6°C,  ΔH=28.71 J g−1). In determining the melting point, a flow of nitrogen gas (40 mL min−1) was purged in the cell and cooled by liquid nitrogen in a refrigerated cooling system. The sample (~5 mg) was weighed in an aluminum pan and placed in the test cell along with a similar empty reference pan. The sample was heated from −20 to 105°C at a rate of 10°C min−1, held at 105°C for 1 min, and cooled to 25°C at −10°C min−1. DSC curves of the last heating cycle were used to determine the melting point range.


### 2.3.5. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy Analysis

The crude wax (~4 mg) was methylated as mentioned by Athukorala et al. [14]. Crude wax was trimethylsilylated with 200 μL of bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide and 100 μL toluene at 75°C for 30 min. The reaction mixture was cooled and concentrated under nitrogen flush and redissolved in hexane.The analysis was conducted with GC-MS QP 2010 Ultra (Shimadzu, Japan) as mentioned by Deswarte et al. [15]. The GC-MS was equipped with a splitless injector. The capillary column used was Rtx-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 0.1 mm film thickness; Restek). Helium was used as the carrier gas (1.3 mL/min). The temperature of the injector was 300°C. The oven condition was 50°C for 1 min, which was increased by 10°C min−1 to 280°C held for 1 min followed by 5°C min−1 ramping to 320°C and held for 10 min. The data was retrieved by using GC-MS solution software and corresponding identification of peaks was done with the help of NIST library.


## 2.3.1. Spectrophotometric Analysis

A known quantity of wax (0.1% w/v) was dissolved in hexane for spectroscopic measurement. The solvent was scanned across wavelength of 200 to 700 nm by using Heliosα  spectrophotometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, USA).


## 2.3.2. Fourier Transform Infrared Analysis

FT-IR spectra of the wax extracts were recorded at 30°C using a Perkin Elmer spectrum 100 model (Perkin Elmer, USA). The FT-IR spectrometer was scanned over the frequency range of 4000–450 cm−1 at a resolution of 8 cm−1. The spectrum was collected by using PE spectrum software.


## 2.3.3. Thin Layer Chromatography Analysis

The wax extracted was subjected to TLC for separation of its various fractions, such as fatty esters, free fatty alcohols, and free fatty acids [11]. Separations were done on aluminum Silufol UV 254 plates (Merck, Mumbai) coated with silica gel layer of 0.25 mm thickness. Wax dissolved in hexane (0.1% w/v) was applied onto the plates which were developed using the solvent system toluene : acetic acid (99 : 1). The spots were visualized using iodine vapor and scanned immediately at 254 nm.


## 2.3.4. Physicochemical Parameters

The physicochemical parameters like acid value, iodine value, and saponification value were done according to the AOAC Official Method [12].Molecular weight of the crude wax was determined using gel permeation chromatography (GPC) that was performed with Waters system equipped with a refractive index detector and Waters Styragel column (HR 4THF (7.8 × 300 mm), Waters, MA, USA) [13]. A flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1 and injection volume of 20 μL were used. The analysis was performed with tetrahydrofuran as the mobile phase, and polystyrene standards, covering a broad molar mass range.The thermal characteristics of the wax sample were measured according to the modified method of Athukorala et al. [14] with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC-60; Shimadzu, Japan). The instrument was calibrated for temperature and heat flow with indium metal (mp = 156.6°C,  ΔH=28.71 J g−1). In determining the melting point, a flow of nitrogen gas (40 mL min−1) was purged in the cell and cooled by liquid nitrogen in a refrigerated cooling system. The sample (~5 mg) was weighed in an aluminum pan and placed in the test cell along with a similar empty reference pan. The sample was heated from −20 to 105°C at a rate of 10°C min−1, held at 105°C for 1 min, and cooled to 25°C at −10°C min−1. DSC curves of the last heating cycle were used to determine the melting point range.


## 2.3.5. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy Analysis

The crude wax (~4 mg) was methylated as mentioned by Athukorala et al. [14]. Crude wax was trimethylsilylated with 200 μL of bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide and 100 μL toluene at 75°C for 30 min. The reaction mixture was cooled and concentrated under nitrogen flush and redissolved in hexane.The analysis was conducted with GC-MS QP 2010 Ultra (Shimadzu, Japan) as mentioned by Deswarte et al. [15]. The GC-MS was equipped with a splitless injector. The capillary column used was Rtx-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 0.1 mm film thickness; Restek). Helium was used as the carrier gas (1.3 mL/min). The temperature of the injector was 300°C. The oven condition was 50°C for 1 min, which was increased by 10°C min−1 to 280°C held for 1 min followed by 5°C min−1 ramping to 320°C and held for 10 min. The data was retrieved by using GC-MS solution software and corresponding identification of peaks was done with the help of NIST library.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Sugarcane Wax Yield

The yield of wax was found to be 0.95% (w/w) of dried sugarcane peels. This yield was less compared to wax extracted from press mud (3.50 to 4.10%) reported by Phukan and Boruah [9]. This can be attributed to the fact that huge quantity of sugarcane juice gets filtered during pressing resulting in press mud having higher concentration of wax, whereas sugarcane peels are produced by shredding surface of sugarcane before crushing, thus affecting the total yield.


### 3.2. UV-Vis and FT-IR Analysis

Fatty acids, conjugated dienes, and hydroperoxides formed as a result of lipid oxidation absorb UV light at about 232 nm and conjugated trienes at about 270 nm [16]. In the UV range (100–400 nm) sugarcane peel wax showed sharp peaks near 230 and 270 nm indicating the presence of conjugated dienes and trienes (Figure 2). Also, in 535–600 nm range no peaks were found indicating absence of carotenoids [17]. The results are in accordance with Athukorala et al. [14] where wax from (Linum usitatissimum) straw has shown similar pattern.Figure 2
UV-Visible spectra of crude wax.FT-IR analysis of wax sample revealed the presence of many organic functional groups present in crude wax indicating their respective compounds. Comparison of the absorption frequencies of various organic functional groups mentioned by Nielsen [16] revealed bands at 2921.73 and 2851.64 cm−1 characteristic of –CH stretch and bend; whereas bands at 1463.44 and 1376.96 cm−1 indicate –CH2 and –CH3 bend. Bands at 3395.60 and 1108.4, 1170.16 cm−1 showed presence of –OH stretch and –C–O stretch, respectively, indicating alcoholic group in the wax sample. Similarly, bands at 1710.25 and 1736.63 cm−1 showed the presence of –C=O stretch but represented two different functional group namely aldehydic and carboxylic acid (Figure 3). It was found that FT-IR results were comparable with those reported by Athukorala et al. [14]. Knuutinen and Norrman [18] reported bands at 2918, 2849, 1745, and 1462 cm−1 for natural and bees wax. Sugarcane peel wax also exhibited similar absorption patterns.Figure 3
FT-IR spectra of crude wax.


### 3.3. Thin Layer Chromatography Analysis

Thin layer chromatography revealed bands having Rf value of 0.29 and 0.85 which corresponds to alcohol and hydrocarbon fraction [11]. The presence of these compounds was further confirmed by GC-MS result where Isotridecyl alcohol and many fatty acids were found to be present.


### 3.4. Physicochemical Parameter

Table1 shows comparative account of physicochemical parameters for wax extracted from sugarcane peels and press mud. Phukan and Boruah [9] reported higher melting point, lower acid value, saponification value, and molecular weight (for both refined and double refined) hard cane sugar wax. In the present study, it was found that wax from sugarcane peels, being crude in nature, shows lower melting point (Figure 4) and higher acid value, saponification value, and molecular weight compared to press mud wax.Table 1
Physicochemical parameters of wax.
Physicochemical parameter
Sugarcane peel wax  (present study)
Sugarcane press mud wax [9]
Color
Pale yellow
Light yellow
Melting point (°C)
62.12
72–75
Acid value (mg KOH/g)
129.15
6.640
Saponification value (mg KOH/g)
374.58
6.894
Molecular wt
Mn
1665
—
Mw
1706
770Figure 4
DSC thermogram of crude wax.


### 3.5. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy Analysis

This method is suitable for the analysis of compounds which are volatile as such or after derivatization [19]. Gas chromatography has been used for the separation of very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA). Identification of long chain fatty acid from sugarcane wax has been done by Řezanka and Sigler [20], where compounds up to C50 were found to be present. Sugarcane peel wax in present study was also subjected to the GC-MS analysis for characterization. Table 2 shows class of compounds present with their retention time and percent composition.Table 2
GC-MS profile of crude wax.
Class of compounds
Name of compounds
Retention time
Area
Percent (%) composition
Alkane
Isobutane
1.280
133790
0.35
Triptane
1.767
9317828
24.22
Cyclopentane
1.861
785256
2.04
Cyclohexane
2.034
795870
2.07
Heneicosane
24.55
55073
0.14
Fatty acid
Propanoic acid
1.485
298913
0.78
Tetradecanoic acid
17.182
25385
0.07
Hexadecanoic acid
19.139
289207
0.75
9, 12-Octadecadienoic acid
20.68
193029
0.50
Trans-9-Octadecenoic acid
20.717
188538
0.49
Octadecanoic acid
20.928
175689
0.46
9-Tetradecenoic acid
22.391
70499
0.18
Tetradecanoic acid
22.579
56098
0.15
Dodecanoic acid
29.008
33706
0.09
Undecanoic acid
29.134
178049
0.46
Malonic acid
31.125
227122
0.59
Ester
Sec-Butyl isothiocyanate
1.716
25488899
66.26
Aldehyde
Pentadecanol
29.258
43882
0.11
Alcohol
Isotridecyl alcohol
26.528
83900
0.22Sugarcane peel wax was predominately founds to contain five main classes of compounds namely, alkanes, fatty acids, alcohol, aldehyde, and ester. Among these, major component was observed to be sec-butyl isothiocyanate. In plants, isothiocyantes are hydrolyzed products of glucosinolates having biological activities including antioxidative, antibacterial, anticancer, gastroprotective, and chemoprotective properties [21, 22]. The presence of sec-butyl isothiocyanate has been reported in stem, leaf, and seed kernel of Moringa peregrima [23, 24].Another major component was alkane which was found to be 28.83% of the total extract. It mainly includes compounds like isobutane, triptane, heneicosane, and so forth (C4–C21). Fatty acids in the sample ranged from propanoic (C3) to Octatdecanoic acid (C18) contributing 4.51% of total extract. Mass spectra of some of the major fatty acids are shown in Figure 5. Propanoic acid, the major fatty acid in the sample has antimicrobial effect, indicating that plants must be producing it as defense action against microbial attack. Apart from these major components aldehyde and alcohol (pentadecanol and isotridecyl alcohol) were found to be present.Mass spectra of major fatty acids (trimethylsilyl derivatives) of sugarcane peel wax. (a) Mass spectrum of propanoic acid. (b) Mass spectrum of hexadecanoic acid. (c) Mass spectrum of malonic acid. (d) Mass spectrum of trans-9-octadecenoic acid.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.1. Sugarcane Wax Yield

The yield of wax was found to be 0.95% (w/w) of dried sugarcane peels. This yield was less compared to wax extracted from press mud (3.50 to 4.10%) reported by Phukan and Boruah [9]. This can be attributed to the fact that huge quantity of sugarcane juice gets filtered during pressing resulting in press mud having higher concentration of wax, whereas sugarcane peels are produced by shredding surface of sugarcane before crushing, thus affecting the total yield.


## 3.2. UV-Vis and FT-IR Analysis

Fatty acids, conjugated dienes, and hydroperoxides formed as a result of lipid oxidation absorb UV light at about 232 nm and conjugated trienes at about 270 nm [16]. In the UV range (100–400 nm) sugarcane peel wax showed sharp peaks near 230 and 270 nm indicating the presence of conjugated dienes and trienes (Figure 2). Also, in 535–600 nm range no peaks were found indicating absence of carotenoids [17]. The results are in accordance with Athukorala et al. [14] where wax from (Linum usitatissimum) straw has shown similar pattern.Figure 2
UV-Visible spectra of crude wax.FT-IR analysis of wax sample revealed the presence of many organic functional groups present in crude wax indicating their respective compounds. Comparison of the absorption frequencies of various organic functional groups mentioned by Nielsen [16] revealed bands at 2921.73 and 2851.64 cm−1 characteristic of –CH stretch and bend; whereas bands at 1463.44 and 1376.96 cm−1 indicate –CH2 and –CH3 bend. Bands at 3395.60 and 1108.4, 1170.16 cm−1 showed presence of –OH stretch and –C–O stretch, respectively, indicating alcoholic group in the wax sample. Similarly, bands at 1710.25 and 1736.63 cm−1 showed the presence of –C=O stretch but represented two different functional group namely aldehydic and carboxylic acid (Figure 3). It was found that FT-IR results were comparable with those reported by Athukorala et al. [14]. Knuutinen and Norrman [18] reported bands at 2918, 2849, 1745, and 1462 cm−1 for natural and bees wax. Sugarcane peel wax also exhibited similar absorption patterns.Figure 3
FT-IR spectra of crude wax.


## 3.3. Thin Layer Chromatography Analysis

Thin layer chromatography revealed bands having Rf value of 0.29 and 0.85 which corresponds to alcohol and hydrocarbon fraction [11]. The presence of these compounds was further confirmed by GC-MS result where Isotridecyl alcohol and many fatty acids were found to be present.


## 3.4. Physicochemical Parameter

Table1 shows comparative account of physicochemical parameters for wax extracted from sugarcane peels and press mud. Phukan and Boruah [9] reported higher melting point, lower acid value, saponification value, and molecular weight (for both refined and double refined) hard cane sugar wax. In the present study, it was found that wax from sugarcane peels, being crude in nature, shows lower melting point (Figure 4) and higher acid value, saponification value, and molecular weight compared to press mud wax.Table 1
Physicochemical parameters of wax.
Physicochemical parameter
Sugarcane peel wax  (present study)
Sugarcane press mud wax [9]
Color
Pale yellow
Light yellow
Melting point (°C)
62.12
72–75
Acid value (mg KOH/g)
129.15
6.640
Saponification value (mg KOH/g)
374.58
6.894
Molecular wt
Mn
1665
—
Mw
1706
770Figure 4
DSC thermogram of crude wax.


## 3.5. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy Analysis

This method is suitable for the analysis of compounds which are volatile as such or after derivatization [19]. Gas chromatography has been used for the separation of very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA). Identification of long chain fatty acid from sugarcane wax has been done by Řezanka and Sigler [20], where compounds up to C50 were found to be present. Sugarcane peel wax in present study was also subjected to the GC-MS analysis for characterization. Table 2 shows class of compounds present with their retention time and percent composition.Table 2
GC-MS profile of crude wax.
Class of compounds
Name of compounds
Retention time
Area
Percent (%) composition
Alkane
Isobutane
1.280
133790
0.35
Triptane
1.767
9317828
24.22
Cyclopentane
1.861
785256
2.04
Cyclohexane
2.034
795870
2.07
Heneicosane
24.55
55073
0.14
Fatty acid
Propanoic acid
1.485
298913
0.78
Tetradecanoic acid
17.182
25385
0.07
Hexadecanoic acid
19.139
289207
0.75
9, 12-Octadecadienoic acid
20.68
193029
0.50
Trans-9-Octadecenoic acid
20.717
188538
0.49
Octadecanoic acid
20.928
175689
0.46
9-Tetradecenoic acid
22.391
70499
0.18
Tetradecanoic acid
22.579
56098
0.15
Dodecanoic acid
29.008
33706
0.09
Undecanoic acid
29.134
178049
0.46
Malonic acid
31.125
227122
0.59
Ester
Sec-Butyl isothiocyanate
1.716
25488899
66.26
Aldehyde
Pentadecanol
29.258
43882
0.11
Alcohol
Isotridecyl alcohol
26.528
83900
0.22Sugarcane peel wax was predominately founds to contain five main classes of compounds namely, alkanes, fatty acids, alcohol, aldehyde, and ester. Among these, major component was observed to be sec-butyl isothiocyanate. In plants, isothiocyantes are hydrolyzed products of glucosinolates having biological activities including antioxidative, antibacterial, anticancer, gastroprotective, and chemoprotective properties [21, 22]. The presence of sec-butyl isothiocyanate has been reported in stem, leaf, and seed kernel of Moringa peregrima [23, 24].Another major component was alkane which was found to be 28.83% of the total extract. It mainly includes compounds like isobutane, triptane, heneicosane, and so forth (C4–C21). Fatty acids in the sample ranged from propanoic (C3) to Octatdecanoic acid (C18) contributing 4.51% of total extract. Mass spectra of some of the major fatty acids are shown in Figure 5. Propanoic acid, the major fatty acid in the sample has antimicrobial effect, indicating that plants must be producing it as defense action against microbial attack. Apart from these major components aldehyde and alcohol (pentadecanol and isotridecyl alcohol) were found to be present.Mass spectra of major fatty acids (trimethylsilyl derivatives) of sugarcane peel wax. (a) Mass spectrum of propanoic acid. (b) Mass spectrum of hexadecanoic acid. (c) Mass spectrum of malonic acid. (d) Mass spectrum of trans-9-octadecenoic acid.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 4. Conclusion

The yield of crude wax from sugarcane peel was 0.95% (w/w). This study revealed the presence of many classes of compounds like alkane, ester, alcohol, fatty acids, and so forth present in sugarcane peel wax. The major component of wax, that is, sec-butyl isothiocyanates which has many beneficial effects can be utilised for medicinal purpose. Alkane heneicosane finds its application as insect semiochemical. Fatty acids playing significant role in human nutrition were found to be present in the wax. Apart from medicinal, semiochemical and nutritional applications, wax can be used in food preservation as an edible coating for fruits and vegetables. Thus, sugarcane wax has many compounds of biological and industrial importance.



---

*Source: 340158-2012-07-25.xml*