# High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method for Analysis of Emtricitabine in Rat Plasma: Method Development, Validation and Application to a Pharmacokinetic Study

Authors: Gurinder Singh; Roopa S. Pai
Journal: ISRN Chromatography
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

A new reverse phase liquid chromatographic method for the investigation of emtricitabine in rat plasma was developed after oral administration to Wistar rats. The desired chromatographic separation was achieved on Phenomenex C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm I.D., 5 µm) column, under isocratic conditions using UV detection at 280 nm. The optimized mobile phase consisted of a mixture of 10 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer- (adjusted to pH 6.8) methanol-2% acetic acid in a ratio of (73 : 25 : 2, v/v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The system was found to produce sharp and well-resolved peaks for emtricitabine with retention time of 5.78 min. The linear regression analysis for the calibration curves showed a good linear correlation over the concentration range 0.050–3.0 µg mL−1, with determination coefficients, R2, exceeding 0.9970. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) were found to be 0.016 µg mL−1 and 0.049 µg mL−1, respectively. The method was successfully applied for the pharmacokinetic in rats. Emtricitabine concentration in plasma reached (Cmax) was 1.357 µg mL−1 about 2 h after oral administration of 15 mg/kg/rat. The AUC0-24 was 12.175 µg mL−1* h and the apparent elimination half-life (t1/2) was 8.153 h. This method was found to be suitable for examining emtricitabine concentration in rats, after oral administration of emtricitabine in a single dose.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Emtricitabine (5-fluoro-1-(2R, 5S)-[2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-oxathiolan-5-yl]cytosine) (Figure1(a)) is a potent deoxycytidine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection [1]. In adults, emtricitabine recommended dose is 200 mg once a day (QD) [2]. Both in vitro[3] and in vivo[4] testing demonstrated that emtricitabine presents enough potential to be tested in the prevention of HIV-1, either alone or in combination [5].Chemical structure of emtricitabine (a) and lamivudine (b).
(a)
(b)A few HPLC and a brief reference to one UPLC method for simultaneous determination of emtricitabine in combination with other antiretroviral drugs in human plasma and rats have been described in the literature, mainly with the objective of method development for application to a bioequivalence study [6–8]. A simultaneous determination of emtricitabine and tenofovir in human plasma was described [9]. HPLC-UV detection method was developed for simultaneous determination of emtricitabine and tenofovir in tablet dosage form with LOQ of 0.091 μg mL−1 [10]. A rapid RP-HPLC method for a combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz was developed and subjected to forced degradation studies with LOQ of emtricitabine that was 1.19 μg mL−1 [11]. A validated RP-HPLC method for the estimation of emtricitabine was not appropriate for detection of low emtricitabine concentration in capsules. In this method, the LOQ value was found to be 16.786 μg mL−1 and retention time was more than 9.341 min [12]. In the above reported HPLC methods, acetonitrile was employed as the organic phase. It is a toxic chemical as it can cause pollution and health hazards to humans and animals [13].The purpose of the present study was to develop and validate a simple and time-saving RP-HPLC method with UV detection for the investigation of emtricitabine after oral administration to Wistar rats. The method was validated according to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines with respect to linearity, precision, accuracy, and specificity and stability studies [14, 15]. Lamivudine (0.8 μg mL−1) was used as an internal standard (IS).


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials and Reagents

Emtricitabine and lamivudine (Figure1(b)) (99.8% w/w and 98.7% w/w, HPLC) were provided ex-gratis by M/S Cipla Laboratories, Mumbai, India. HPLC grade methanol was purchased from SD fine-chem limited (Mumbai, India). Deionized water used in all the experiments was passed through a Milli-Q water purification system (18.2 MΩ/cm) Millipore (Bangalore, Karnataka, India).


### 2.2. Instrumentation

The HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) instrument was equipped with binary pump and SPD-20AVP UV detector. Sample injection was done by Rheodyne injector with a 50μL loop and a computer running Varian workstation version 6.42 software for data acquisition and processing. The chromatographic analysis was carried out on Phenomenex C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm I.D., 5 μm).


### 2.3. Chromatographic Conditions

Chromatographic separation was achieved using Phenomenex C18 column. The mobile phase was composed of 10 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (adjusted to pH 6.8)-methanol-2% acetic acid in a ratio of 73 : 25 : 2 (v/v/v) run under isocratic elution and pumped at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The column was thermostated at 30°C. Under these conditions the run time was less than 8 min.


### 2.4. Optimization and Chromatographic Method Development

Trial experiments were carried out initially, in order to choose most appropriate solvent system for precise analysis and to achieve good resolution. Column chemistry, solvent type, solvent ratio (volume of organic solvents in the mobile phase), flow rate detection, and wavelength were varied to establish the chromatographic conditions giving the good separation. On the basis of time required for analysis, sensitivity of the assay, resolution time, and use of readily available cost-effective solvents, the aptness of the mobile phase and the flow rate was decided. These included water-methanol (50 : 50, v/v), 10 mM pH 6.8 PBS-methanol (50 : 50, v/v), 10 mM pH 6.8 PBS-methanol (70 : 30, v/v), 10 mM pH 6.8 PBS-methanol-2% acetic acid (70 : 25 : 5, v/v/v), and 10 mM pH 6.8 PBS-methanol-2% acetic acid (73 : 25 : 2, v/v/v). A mobile phase system comprised of 10 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 6.8)-methanol-2% acetic acid (73 : 25 : 2, v/v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1 was found to be optimum. The experimental work was performed in an air-conditioned room maintained at 20–25°C.


### 2.5. Preparation of Calibration Curve (CC) and Quality Control Samples (QC)

Eight-point calibration curve (CC) was prepared by serial dilution of emtricitabine stock solution (100μg mL−1) in the range of 0.050, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3 μg mL−1 that were obtained by measuring the required amount of 100 μg mL−1 working standard solution, mixed with a sufficient quantity of mobile phase and making up to 10 mL. Similarly, six standard solutions were prepared by serial dilution of emtricitabine stock solution (10 μg mL−1) in the range of 0.005, 0.010, 0.020, 0.030, 0.040 and 0.050 μg mL−1. Six standard solutions were obtained from the 10 μg mL−1 working standard solution, in order to determine the LOD and LOQ of the method.Calibration standards were prepared daily by spiking 100μL of blank plasma with 10 μL of the appropriate working solution resulting in concentrations of 0.050, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3 μg mL−1 and 0.005, 0.010, 0.020, 0.030, 0.040, and 0.050 μg mL−1, respectively, of emtricitabine. Stock solution (0.8 μg mL−1) of lamivudine (I.S) was prepared in methanol and stored at −20°C. The solutions were stable for one day when stored at room temperature (20–25°C). The stock and standard solutions) were prepared on a daily basis and stored in the dark at about 5°C. All solutions were used on the day they were prepared.Quality control (QC) samples (low quality control (LQC), 0.1μg mL−1; medium quality control (MQC), 1.0 μg mL−1; high quality control (HQC), 2.5 μg mL−1; limit of quantification (LOQ), 0.049 μg mL−1 were prepared by spiking 0.1 mL aliquot of blank plasma with 10 μL of spiking solution of drug as well as the IS. All solutions were stored in the refrigerator at 4.0±2.0°C. The bulk spiked CC and QC samples were stored at −20°C and brought to room temperature before use.


### 2.6. Sample Preparation

To a 50μL of rat plasma, 10 μL of IS and 100 μL of emtricitabine were added and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Emtricitabine was then extracted using 30 μL of acetonitrile followed by vortexing for 2 min. After vortexing, the samples were subjected to centrifuge at 12,000 ×g for 10 min. The supernatant was decanted into a china dish and evaporated to dryness at room temperature. This was further reconstituted with 100 μL of mobile phase and vortexed for 30 s and 20 μL was injected into an HPLC system. Emtricitabine was detected at a wavelength of 280 nm.


### 2.7. Method Validation Study

The developed method was validated as per ICH guidelines using emtricitabine with respect to the following parameters: accuracy, precision, LOD, LOQ, specificity, stability, and system suitability.


#### 2.7.1. Linearity

For testing linearity, seven calibration standards were prepared in the concentration range of 0.05–3.0μg mL−1 (0.050, 0.1, 0.5, 1.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 μg mL−1). Standard curve was achieved by plotting peak area against concentration, and the evaluation of linearity was completed by linear regression analysis using least square method.


#### 2.7.2. Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantitation

Normally, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) are estimated at a signal to noise ratio of 3 : 1 and 10 : 1, respectively. LOD and LOQ were determined based on the response and slope of a specific calibration curve obtained from six standard solutions (0.005, 0.010, 0.020, 0.030, 0.040, and 0.050μg mL−1) that were in proximity of these limit concentration values.


#### 2.7.3. Selectivity, Specificity, and Linearity

Selectivity was verified by analyzing the blank plasma from rats to test interference at the analyte retention times. By employing the proposed extraction procedure each blank plasma sample was tested and then compared with the results of plasma samples spiked with emtricitabine (n=6) in calibration standard to ensure no interference of emtricitabine from plasma.Spiked plasma samples that contained increasing concentrations of emtricitabine from 0.050 to 3.0μg mL−1 were analyzed according to the procedure described above. The linearity was detected by calculating the correlation coefficient (r) of the curves by means of least-squared linear regression method. All calibration curves of emtricitabine were constructed prior to the experiments with correlation coefficient of (r2>0.9987).


#### 2.7.4. Accuracy

The accuracy of the assay method was evaluated in triplicate at three different concentration levels (0.1, 1.0, and 2.5μg mL−1), and the percentage recoveries were calculated.


#### 2.7.5. Precision

The precision is usually reported as the percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) of a set of responses. Precision was represented into two categories, namely, repeatability (intraday precision) and intermediate precision (interday precision).


#### 2.7.6. Repeatability or Intraday Precision

Repeatability was tested by analyzing six determinations at three different concentrations, namely, low, medium, and high within the linearity range.


#### 2.7.7. Intermediate or Interday Precision

The inter-day variability of this method was assessed over three days at three low, medium, and high concentrations of emtricitabine standard in replicates of six.


#### 2.7.8. Pharmacokinetic Study in Rats

The pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in healthy male Wistar rats (200–250 g), and the animals were fasted overnight before dosing with free access to water. The animals were acclimatized to laboratory conditions over the week before experiments and fed with standard rat diet, under controlled conditions of a 12 : 12 h light : dark cycle, with a temperature of22±3°C and a relative humidity of 50±5% RH. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (AACP/IAEC/Jun-2012-02).Twelve rats were randomly separated into two groups (six animals each group). The grouping of animals was as follows:Group I: control normal rats (received saline solution),Group II: administered with pure drug (as solution) (15 mg/kg/rat) [16].At regular time intervals 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 12, 20 and 24 h samples of blood were withdrawn (100 μL) from the retro-orbital plexus by microcapillary technique under light ether anesthesia into heparinized microcentrifuge tubes (50 units heparin/mL of blood). Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 12,000 ×g for 15 min and analyzed by the following method. Plasma samples were deproteinated with 1 mL of acetonitrile, vortexed for 2 min, and centrifuged at 12,000 ×g for 10 min. The supernatant was decanted into a China dish and evaporated to dryness at room temperature. This was further reconstituted with 100 μL of mobile phase and vortexed for 30 s and 20 μL was injected into an HPLC system. Emtricitabine was detected at a wavelength of 280 nm.


## 2.1. Materials and Reagents

Emtricitabine and lamivudine (Figure1(b)) (99.8% w/w and 98.7% w/w, HPLC) were provided ex-gratis by M/S Cipla Laboratories, Mumbai, India. HPLC grade methanol was purchased from SD fine-chem limited (Mumbai, India). Deionized water used in all the experiments was passed through a Milli-Q water purification system (18.2 MΩ/cm) Millipore (Bangalore, Karnataka, India).


## 2.2. Instrumentation

The HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) instrument was equipped with binary pump and SPD-20AVP UV detector. Sample injection was done by Rheodyne injector with a 50μL loop and a computer running Varian workstation version 6.42 software for data acquisition and processing. The chromatographic analysis was carried out on Phenomenex C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm I.D., 5 μm).


## 2.3. Chromatographic Conditions

Chromatographic separation was achieved using Phenomenex C18 column. The mobile phase was composed of 10 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (adjusted to pH 6.8)-methanol-2% acetic acid in a ratio of 73 : 25 : 2 (v/v/v) run under isocratic elution and pumped at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The column was thermostated at 30°C. Under these conditions the run time was less than 8 min.


## 2.4. Optimization and Chromatographic Method Development

Trial experiments were carried out initially, in order to choose most appropriate solvent system for precise analysis and to achieve good resolution. Column chemistry, solvent type, solvent ratio (volume of organic solvents in the mobile phase), flow rate detection, and wavelength were varied to establish the chromatographic conditions giving the good separation. On the basis of time required for analysis, sensitivity of the assay, resolution time, and use of readily available cost-effective solvents, the aptness of the mobile phase and the flow rate was decided. These included water-methanol (50 : 50, v/v), 10 mM pH 6.8 PBS-methanol (50 : 50, v/v), 10 mM pH 6.8 PBS-methanol (70 : 30, v/v), 10 mM pH 6.8 PBS-methanol-2% acetic acid (70 : 25 : 5, v/v/v), and 10 mM pH 6.8 PBS-methanol-2% acetic acid (73 : 25 : 2, v/v/v). A mobile phase system comprised of 10 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 6.8)-methanol-2% acetic acid (73 : 25 : 2, v/v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1 was found to be optimum. The experimental work was performed in an air-conditioned room maintained at 20–25°C.


## 2.5. Preparation of Calibration Curve (CC) and Quality Control Samples (QC)

Eight-point calibration curve (CC) was prepared by serial dilution of emtricitabine stock solution (100μg mL−1) in the range of 0.050, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3 μg mL−1 that were obtained by measuring the required amount of 100 μg mL−1 working standard solution, mixed with a sufficient quantity of mobile phase and making up to 10 mL. Similarly, six standard solutions were prepared by serial dilution of emtricitabine stock solution (10 μg mL−1) in the range of 0.005, 0.010, 0.020, 0.030, 0.040 and 0.050 μg mL−1. Six standard solutions were obtained from the 10 μg mL−1 working standard solution, in order to determine the LOD and LOQ of the method.Calibration standards were prepared daily by spiking 100μL of blank plasma with 10 μL of the appropriate working solution resulting in concentrations of 0.050, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3 μg mL−1 and 0.005, 0.010, 0.020, 0.030, 0.040, and 0.050 μg mL−1, respectively, of emtricitabine. Stock solution (0.8 μg mL−1) of lamivudine (I.S) was prepared in methanol and stored at −20°C. The solutions were stable for one day when stored at room temperature (20–25°C). The stock and standard solutions) were prepared on a daily basis and stored in the dark at about 5°C. All solutions were used on the day they were prepared.Quality control (QC) samples (low quality control (LQC), 0.1μg mL−1; medium quality control (MQC), 1.0 μg mL−1; high quality control (HQC), 2.5 μg mL−1; limit of quantification (LOQ), 0.049 μg mL−1 were prepared by spiking 0.1 mL aliquot of blank plasma with 10 μL of spiking solution of drug as well as the IS. All solutions were stored in the refrigerator at 4.0±2.0°C. The bulk spiked CC and QC samples were stored at −20°C and brought to room temperature before use.


## 2.6. Sample Preparation

To a 50μL of rat plasma, 10 μL of IS and 100 μL of emtricitabine were added and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Emtricitabine was then extracted using 30 μL of acetonitrile followed by vortexing for 2 min. After vortexing, the samples were subjected to centrifuge at 12,000 ×g for 10 min. The supernatant was decanted into a china dish and evaporated to dryness at room temperature. This was further reconstituted with 100 μL of mobile phase and vortexed for 30 s and 20 μL was injected into an HPLC system. Emtricitabine was detected at a wavelength of 280 nm.


## 2.7. Method Validation Study

The developed method was validated as per ICH guidelines using emtricitabine with respect to the following parameters: accuracy, precision, LOD, LOQ, specificity, stability, and system suitability.


### 2.7.1. Linearity

For testing linearity, seven calibration standards were prepared in the concentration range of 0.05–3.0μg mL−1 (0.050, 0.1, 0.5, 1.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 μg mL−1). Standard curve was achieved by plotting peak area against concentration, and the evaluation of linearity was completed by linear regression analysis using least square method.


### 2.7.2. Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantitation

Normally, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) are estimated at a signal to noise ratio of 3 : 1 and 10 : 1, respectively. LOD and LOQ were determined based on the response and slope of a specific calibration curve obtained from six standard solutions (0.005, 0.010, 0.020, 0.030, 0.040, and 0.050μg mL−1) that were in proximity of these limit concentration values.


### 2.7.3. Selectivity, Specificity, and Linearity

Selectivity was verified by analyzing the blank plasma from rats to test interference at the analyte retention times. By employing the proposed extraction procedure each blank plasma sample was tested and then compared with the results of plasma samples spiked with emtricitabine (n=6) in calibration standard to ensure no interference of emtricitabine from plasma.Spiked plasma samples that contained increasing concentrations of emtricitabine from 0.050 to 3.0μg mL−1 were analyzed according to the procedure described above. The linearity was detected by calculating the correlation coefficient (r) of the curves by means of least-squared linear regression method. All calibration curves of emtricitabine were constructed prior to the experiments with correlation coefficient of (r2>0.9987).


### 2.7.4. Accuracy

The accuracy of the assay method was evaluated in triplicate at three different concentration levels (0.1, 1.0, and 2.5μg mL−1), and the percentage recoveries were calculated.


### 2.7.5. Precision

The precision is usually reported as the percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) of a set of responses. Precision was represented into two categories, namely, repeatability (intraday precision) and intermediate precision (interday precision).


### 2.7.6. Repeatability or Intraday Precision

Repeatability was tested by analyzing six determinations at three different concentrations, namely, low, medium, and high within the linearity range.


### 2.7.7. Intermediate or Interday Precision

The inter-day variability of this method was assessed over three days at three low, medium, and high concentrations of emtricitabine standard in replicates of six.


### 2.7.8. Pharmacokinetic Study in Rats

The pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in healthy male Wistar rats (200–250 g), and the animals were fasted overnight before dosing with free access to water. The animals were acclimatized to laboratory conditions over the week before experiments and fed with standard rat diet, under controlled conditions of a 12 : 12 h light : dark cycle, with a temperature of22±3°C and a relative humidity of 50±5% RH. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (AACP/IAEC/Jun-2012-02).Twelve rats were randomly separated into two groups (six animals each group). The grouping of animals was as follows:Group I: control normal rats (received saline solution),Group II: administered with pure drug (as solution) (15 mg/kg/rat) [16].At regular time intervals 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 12, 20 and 24 h samples of blood were withdrawn (100 μL) from the retro-orbital plexus by microcapillary technique under light ether anesthesia into heparinized microcentrifuge tubes (50 units heparin/mL of blood). Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 12,000 ×g for 15 min and analyzed by the following method. Plasma samples were deproteinated with 1 mL of acetonitrile, vortexed for 2 min, and centrifuged at 12,000 ×g for 10 min. The supernatant was decanted into a China dish and evaporated to dryness at room temperature. This was further reconstituted with 100 μL of mobile phase and vortexed for 30 s and 20 μL was injected into an HPLC system. Emtricitabine was detected at a wavelength of 280 nm.


## 2.7.1. Linearity

For testing linearity, seven calibration standards were prepared in the concentration range of 0.05–3.0μg mL−1 (0.050, 0.1, 0.5, 1.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 μg mL−1). Standard curve was achieved by plotting peak area against concentration, and the evaluation of linearity was completed by linear regression analysis using least square method.


## 2.7.2. Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantitation

Normally, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) are estimated at a signal to noise ratio of 3 : 1 and 10 : 1, respectively. LOD and LOQ were determined based on the response and slope of a specific calibration curve obtained from six standard solutions (0.005, 0.010, 0.020, 0.030, 0.040, and 0.050μg mL−1) that were in proximity of these limit concentration values.


## 2.7.3. Selectivity, Specificity, and Linearity

Selectivity was verified by analyzing the blank plasma from rats to test interference at the analyte retention times. By employing the proposed extraction procedure each blank plasma sample was tested and then compared with the results of plasma samples spiked with emtricitabine (n=6) in calibration standard to ensure no interference of emtricitabine from plasma.Spiked plasma samples that contained increasing concentrations of emtricitabine from 0.050 to 3.0μg mL−1 were analyzed according to the procedure described above. The linearity was detected by calculating the correlation coefficient (r) of the curves by means of least-squared linear regression method. All calibration curves of emtricitabine were constructed prior to the experiments with correlation coefficient of (r2>0.9987).


## 2.7.4. Accuracy

The accuracy of the assay method was evaluated in triplicate at three different concentration levels (0.1, 1.0, and 2.5μg mL−1), and the percentage recoveries were calculated.


## 2.7.5. Precision

The precision is usually reported as the percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) of a set of responses. Precision was represented into two categories, namely, repeatability (intraday precision) and intermediate precision (interday precision).


## 2.7.6. Repeatability or Intraday Precision

Repeatability was tested by analyzing six determinations at three different concentrations, namely, low, medium, and high within the linearity range.


## 2.7.7. Intermediate or Interday Precision

The inter-day variability of this method was assessed over three days at three low, medium, and high concentrations of emtricitabine standard in replicates of six.


## 2.7.8. Pharmacokinetic Study in Rats

The pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in healthy male Wistar rats (200–250 g), and the animals were fasted overnight before dosing with free access to water. The animals were acclimatized to laboratory conditions over the week before experiments and fed with standard rat diet, under controlled conditions of a 12 : 12 h light : dark cycle, with a temperature of22±3°C and a relative humidity of 50±5% RH. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (AACP/IAEC/Jun-2012-02).Twelve rats were randomly separated into two groups (six animals each group). The grouping of animals was as follows:Group I: control normal rats (received saline solution),Group II: administered with pure drug (as solution) (15 mg/kg/rat) [16].At regular time intervals 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 12, 20 and 24 h samples of blood were withdrawn (100 μL) from the retro-orbital plexus by microcapillary technique under light ether anesthesia into heparinized microcentrifuge tubes (50 units heparin/mL of blood). Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 12,000 ×g for 15 min and analyzed by the following method. Plasma samples were deproteinated with 1 mL of acetonitrile, vortexed for 2 min, and centrifuged at 12,000 ×g for 10 min. The supernatant was decanted into a China dish and evaporated to dryness at room temperature. This was further reconstituted with 100 μL of mobile phase and vortexed for 30 s and 20 μL was injected into an HPLC system. Emtricitabine was detected at a wavelength of 280 nm.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Method Development and Optimization of HPLC-UV Conditions

A liquid chromatographic method for the estimation of emtricitabine in rat plasma has been developed and validated according to the principles of Good Laboratory Practices. An appropriate wavelength was important for good sensitivity. It is shown in Figure1(a) that emtricitabine has a special conjugation structure which leads to strong UV absorption at the wavelength of 280 nm. Therefore, the detection wavelength was set at 280 nm. It was necessary to use an IS in extraction techniques and HPLC method to compensate for extraction variation, efficiency, and analytical errors. Lamivudine was adopted as the IS in this study for the reasons that it is structurally similar to emtricitabine and its behavioural characteristics and properties conform to the chemical requirement for IS in HPLC. In addition, lamivudine is commercially available in high purity, and it is stable and nonreactive with sample or mobile phase. Meanwhile, it also has good response at the detection wavelength of 280 nm.To acquire short run time and good resolution for both analyte and IS several trials were carried out to optimized the mobile phase. The feasibility of various combinations of solvents such as acetonitrile and methanol with altered flowrates (in the range 1–1.2 mL min−1) was investigated for complete chromatographic resolution of the emtricitabine with best sensitivity, efficiency, and peak shape. Methanol was selected as organic phase because of its least viscosity and has strong eluting power. Therefore, according to the chemical characteristics of emtricitabine and IS, appropriate concentration of acidic modifier, acetic acid added into mobile phase, and an increase in the methanol content could improve peak shape. An increase in the water content not only broadened the peak but also resulted in extremely rapid desorption and elution of emtricitabine.Finally, it was found that a mixture of 10 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer- (adjusted to pH 6.8) methanol-2% acetic acid in a ratio of (73 : 25 : 2, v/v/v) with pH adjusted with orthophosphoric acid to 3.5 at a flowrate of 1 mL min−1 could achieve the above purpose that was found to be optimum and provided adequate peak separation, with less tailing and resulted in good resolution among all the other combinations tested which was finally adopted as the mobile phase.


### 3.2. Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantitation

Concentrations of LOD and LOQ were found to be 0.016 and 0.049μg mL−1, respectively.


### 3.3. Specificity

Specificity is expressed as the capability of a method to distinguish the analyte from all potentially intrusive substance. The specificity of the method was scrutinized by blank plasma detection, peak purity, and spiking blank plasma with pure standard compounds. Blank plasma had no interference, when emtricitabine and the IS were eluted. At optimized conditions, the separation of emtricitabine and lamivudine was completed within 8 min (Figure2).Figure 2
At optimized conditions: (a) chromatographic profile of the plasma spiked with emtricitabine (2μg mL−1) in the presence of the I.S (0.8 μg mL−1).


### 3.4. Linearity

Each sample was analyzed in replicates of six to verify the reproducibility of detector response at each concentration level. The detector responses were found to be linear over the concentration range from 0.050 to 3.0μg mL−1 as portrays in Figure 3. The regression equation for the graph is y=533.99x+35.72, and the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.9970 showing excellent correlation between the area and the concentration.Figure 3
Linearity graph of emtricitabine at 0.050, 0.1, 0.5, 1.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0μg mL−1.


### 3.5. Precision

The percentage relative standard deviation (%RSD) of the area of emtricitabine during intraday study was found to be less than 5 and for interday study was found to be less than 6.5, which indicated a good precision of the method (Table1). Intra-day and inter-day precision (% R.S.D) of the methods were lower than 7% and were within the acceptable limits to meet the guidelines for bioanalytical method validation which is considered to be ≤15% [13, 15].Table 1
Intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy of emtricitabine in rat plasma (n=6).
Concentration (µg mL−1)
Observed concentration(µg mL−1)
Precision%
Accuracy%
Intraday
0.1
0.097 ± 0.003
3.09
97.0
1.0
0.982 ± 0.044
4.48
98.20
2.5
2.465 ± 0.078
3.16
98.0
Interday
0.1
0.092 ± 0.005
5.45
92.0
1.0
0.975 ± 0.063
6.46
97.50
2.5
2.427 ± 0.105
4.32
97.08


### 3.6. Accuracy

The quantitative recovery of emtricitabine achieved ranged from 92.0 to 98.20% with a low %RSD value. The results of the recovery experiments done at three concentration levels and the %RSD values are given in Table1.


### 3.7. Stability

Bench-top stability was investigated to ensure that emtricitabine was not degraded in plasma samples at room temperature for a time period to cover the sample preparation. It was measured by divulging the QC samples to ambient laboratory conditions for 10 h. Freeze-thaw stability was measured over three cycles. Because of the need for occasional delayed injection of extraction samples, the stability of reconstituted samples was assessed at ambient temperature for 24 h. The freezer storage stability of emtricitabine rat plasma at −20°C was evaluated by assaying QC samples at the beginning and one week later. All stability QC samples were analyzed in six replicates. The results indicated that emtricitabine had an acceptable stability under those conditions (Table2).Table 2
Stability of emtricitabine in rat plasma (n=6).
Sample condition
Spiked concentration (μg/mL)
Mean determined concentration(µg/mL)
Accuracy (%)
Bench-top stability♣
0.1
0.094
94.00
1.0
0.98
98.00
2.5
2.42
96.80
Freeze-thaw stability▸
0.1
0.099
99.00
1.0
1.03
103.00
2.5
2.46
98.40
One-week stability♦
0.1
0.092
92.00
1.0
0.89
89.00
2.5
2.38
95.20
♣Exposed at ambient temperature (25°C) for 4 h.
▸After three freeze-thaw cycles.
♦Stored at −16°C.


### 3.8. Application of the Assay

The validated method was successfully applied to investigate the content of emtricitabine inin vivo, after administered orally to rats. Oral administration of emtricitabine in the present study resulted in a sharp Cmax of 1.357 μg mL−1 within 2 h after which the plasma concentration declined rapidly, indicating a rapid absorption of emtricitabine. The areas under the concentration versus time curve were 12.175 μg mL−1 * h. The representative chromatogram of a plasma sample, which was collected from Wistar rats 2 h following oral administration of emtricitabine as portrays in Figure 4. The plasma profile of emtricitabine is shown in Figure 5. The results substantiate the suitability of the developed method for determining emtricitabine concentration in plasma after oral administration. The pharmacokinetic data of emtricitabine after oral administration in rats is shown in Table 3.Table 3
Pharmacokinetic parameters of emtricitabine at a dose of 15 mg/kg/rat.
Pharmacokinetic parameters
Emtricitabine
C
max (µg mL−1)
1.357 ± 0.029
t
max (h)
2.0 ± 0.007
t
1
/
2 (h)
8.153 ± 0.670
AUC
0
–
24 (µg mL−1 * h)
12.175 ± 0.326
AUMC
0
–
24 (µg mL−1 * h)
163.51 ± 24.038
K
e (1/h)
0.0681 ± 0.007
MRT
15.6 ± 0.743
Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n=6).Figure 4
Chromatogram of plasma sample collected from rats 2 h after oral administration of emtricitabine.Figure 5
Plasma concentration-time curve of emtricitabine after being orally administered male Wistar rats at dose of 15 mg/kg/rat (n=6, mean ± S.D).


## 3.1. Method Development and Optimization of HPLC-UV Conditions

A liquid chromatographic method for the estimation of emtricitabine in rat plasma has been developed and validated according to the principles of Good Laboratory Practices. An appropriate wavelength was important for good sensitivity. It is shown in Figure1(a) that emtricitabine has a special conjugation structure which leads to strong UV absorption at the wavelength of 280 nm. Therefore, the detection wavelength was set at 280 nm. It was necessary to use an IS in extraction techniques and HPLC method to compensate for extraction variation, efficiency, and analytical errors. Lamivudine was adopted as the IS in this study for the reasons that it is structurally similar to emtricitabine and its behavioural characteristics and properties conform to the chemical requirement for IS in HPLC. In addition, lamivudine is commercially available in high purity, and it is stable and nonreactive with sample or mobile phase. Meanwhile, it also has good response at the detection wavelength of 280 nm.To acquire short run time and good resolution for both analyte and IS several trials were carried out to optimized the mobile phase. The feasibility of various combinations of solvents such as acetonitrile and methanol with altered flowrates (in the range 1–1.2 mL min−1) was investigated for complete chromatographic resolution of the emtricitabine with best sensitivity, efficiency, and peak shape. Methanol was selected as organic phase because of its least viscosity and has strong eluting power. Therefore, according to the chemical characteristics of emtricitabine and IS, appropriate concentration of acidic modifier, acetic acid added into mobile phase, and an increase in the methanol content could improve peak shape. An increase in the water content not only broadened the peak but also resulted in extremely rapid desorption and elution of emtricitabine.Finally, it was found that a mixture of 10 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer- (adjusted to pH 6.8) methanol-2% acetic acid in a ratio of (73 : 25 : 2, v/v/v) with pH adjusted with orthophosphoric acid to 3.5 at a flowrate of 1 mL min−1 could achieve the above purpose that was found to be optimum and provided adequate peak separation, with less tailing and resulted in good resolution among all the other combinations tested which was finally adopted as the mobile phase.


## 3.2. Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantitation

Concentrations of LOD and LOQ were found to be 0.016 and 0.049μg mL−1, respectively.


## 3.3. Specificity

Specificity is expressed as the capability of a method to distinguish the analyte from all potentially intrusive substance. The specificity of the method was scrutinized by blank plasma detection, peak purity, and spiking blank plasma with pure standard compounds. Blank plasma had no interference, when emtricitabine and the IS were eluted. At optimized conditions, the separation of emtricitabine and lamivudine was completed within 8 min (Figure2).Figure 2
At optimized conditions: (a) chromatographic profile of the plasma spiked with emtricitabine (2μg mL−1) in the presence of the I.S (0.8 μg mL−1).


## 3.4. Linearity

Each sample was analyzed in replicates of six to verify the reproducibility of detector response at each concentration level. The detector responses were found to be linear over the concentration range from 0.050 to 3.0μg mL−1 as portrays in Figure 3. The regression equation for the graph is y=533.99x+35.72, and the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.9970 showing excellent correlation between the area and the concentration.Figure 3
Linearity graph of emtricitabine at 0.050, 0.1, 0.5, 1.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0μg mL−1.


## 3.5. Precision

The percentage relative standard deviation (%RSD) of the area of emtricitabine during intraday study was found to be less than 5 and for interday study was found to be less than 6.5, which indicated a good precision of the method (Table1). Intra-day and inter-day precision (% R.S.D) of the methods were lower than 7% and were within the acceptable limits to meet the guidelines for bioanalytical method validation which is considered to be ≤15% [13, 15].Table 1
Intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy of emtricitabine in rat plasma (n=6).
Concentration (µg mL−1)
Observed concentration(µg mL−1)
Precision%
Accuracy%
Intraday
0.1
0.097 ± 0.003
3.09
97.0
1.0
0.982 ± 0.044
4.48
98.20
2.5
2.465 ± 0.078
3.16
98.0
Interday
0.1
0.092 ± 0.005
5.45
92.0
1.0
0.975 ± 0.063
6.46
97.50
2.5
2.427 ± 0.105
4.32
97.08


## 3.6. Accuracy

The quantitative recovery of emtricitabine achieved ranged from 92.0 to 98.20% with a low %RSD value. The results of the recovery experiments done at three concentration levels and the %RSD values are given in Table1.


## 3.7. Stability

Bench-top stability was investigated to ensure that emtricitabine was not degraded in plasma samples at room temperature for a time period to cover the sample preparation. It was measured by divulging the QC samples to ambient laboratory conditions for 10 h. Freeze-thaw stability was measured over three cycles. Because of the need for occasional delayed injection of extraction samples, the stability of reconstituted samples was assessed at ambient temperature for 24 h. The freezer storage stability of emtricitabine rat plasma at −20°C was evaluated by assaying QC samples at the beginning and one week later. All stability QC samples were analyzed in six replicates. The results indicated that emtricitabine had an acceptable stability under those conditions (Table2).Table 2
Stability of emtricitabine in rat plasma (n=6).
Sample condition
Spiked concentration (μg/mL)
Mean determined concentration(µg/mL)
Accuracy (%)
Bench-top stability♣
0.1
0.094
94.00
1.0
0.98
98.00
2.5
2.42
96.80
Freeze-thaw stability▸
0.1
0.099
99.00
1.0
1.03
103.00
2.5
2.46
98.40
One-week stability♦
0.1
0.092
92.00
1.0
0.89
89.00
2.5
2.38
95.20
♣Exposed at ambient temperature (25°C) for 4 h.
▸After three freeze-thaw cycles.
♦Stored at −16°C.


## 3.8. Application of the Assay

The validated method was successfully applied to investigate the content of emtricitabine inin vivo, after administered orally to rats. Oral administration of emtricitabine in the present study resulted in a sharp Cmax of 1.357 μg mL−1 within 2 h after which the plasma concentration declined rapidly, indicating a rapid absorption of emtricitabine. The areas under the concentration versus time curve were 12.175 μg mL−1 * h. The representative chromatogram of a plasma sample, which was collected from Wistar rats 2 h following oral administration of emtricitabine as portrays in Figure 4. The plasma profile of emtricitabine is shown in Figure 5. The results substantiate the suitability of the developed method for determining emtricitabine concentration in plasma after oral administration. The pharmacokinetic data of emtricitabine after oral administration in rats is shown in Table 3.Table 3
Pharmacokinetic parameters of emtricitabine at a dose of 15 mg/kg/rat.
Pharmacokinetic parameters
Emtricitabine
C
max (µg mL−1)
1.357 ± 0.029
t
max (h)
2.0 ± 0.007
t
1
/
2 (h)
8.153 ± 0.670
AUC
0
–
24 (µg mL−1 * h)
12.175 ± 0.326
AUMC
0
–
24 (µg mL−1 * h)
163.51 ± 24.038
K
e (1/h)
0.0681 ± 0.007
MRT
15.6 ± 0.743
Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n=6).Figure 4
Chromatogram of plasma sample collected from rats 2 h after oral administration of emtricitabine.Figure 5
Plasma concentration-time curve of emtricitabine after being orally administered male Wistar rats at dose of 15 mg/kg/rat (n=6, mean ± S.D).


## 4. Conclusion

A specific, linear, accurate, reliable, and reproducible new method of emtricitabine in rat plasma was developed and fully validated over the range 0.050–3.0μg mL−1 with LOQ of 0.049 μg mL−1. The method was successfully applied to measure the drug concentration in plasma after oral administration to rats. Such low LOQ is very important for pharmacokinetic study of sustained release oral formulations, where a drug concentration in blood is very low at several time points. Reproducible high recovery of emtricitabine was achieved. Because of its highly satisfactory sensitivity, accuracy, linearity, and specificity, this HPLC methodology could thus be an appropriate tool for further determination of emtricitabine in plasma samples in the pharmacokinetic studies.



---

*Source: 329072-2013-11-30.xml*