# Vectors and Spatial Patterns ofAngiostrongylus cantonensis in Selected Rice-Farming Villages of Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines

Authors: Ma. Angelica A. Tujan; Ian Kendrich C. Fontanilla; Vachel Gay V. Paller
Journal: Journal of Parasitology Research
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

In the Philippines, rats and snails abound in agricultural areas as pests and source of food for some of the local people which poses risks of parasite transmission to humans such asAngiostrongylus cantonensis. This study was conducted to determine the extent ofA. cantonensis infection among rats and snails collected from rice-farming villages of Muñoz, Nueva Ecija. A total of 209 rats, 781 freshwater snails, and 120 terrestrial snails were collected for the study. Heart and lungs of rats and snail tissues were examined and subjected to artificial digestion for parasite collection. Adult worms from rats were identified using SSU rDNA gene. Seven nematode sequences obtained matchedA. cantonensis. Results revealed that 31% of the rats examined were positive withA. cantonensis.Rattus norvegicus andR. tanezumi showed prevalence of 46% and 29%, respectively. Furthermore, onlyPomacea canaliculata (2%) andMelanoides maculata (1%) were found to be positive forA. cantonensis among the snails collected. Analysis of host distribution showed overlapping habitats of rats and snails as well as residential and agricultural areas indicating risks to public health. This study presents a possible route of human infection forA. cantonensis through handling and consumption ofP. canaliculata andM. maculata or crops contaminated by these snails.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Angiostrongylus cantonensis or the rat lungworm is a zoonotic helminth responsible for the disease called angiostrongylosis. Its life cycle involves rodents as definitive hosts and mollusks as intermediate hosts. It can also infect other animals, for example, shrimps and frogs, without further development and still be infective when ingested. Humans, however, are dead-end hosts forA. cantonensis and can be infected through ingestion of infected mollusks, things contaminated by infected mollusks, for example, soil and vegetables [1, 2], and ingestion of paratenic hosts. As a result,A. cantonensis is the major cause of eosinophilic meningitis in humans particularly in Indo-Pacific regions where it is endemic. The animal-human environmental interface ofA. cantonensis is difficult to assess and one of the reasons is that its hosts are easily affected by changes in the environment [3]. Changes in ecology and environment may also result in changes in the epidemiology of this parasite. Thus, it is important to assess the possible transmission route of the parasite due to its risks to both veterinary and public health.Nueva Ecija is the rice granary of the Philippines and one of its towns, Muñoz, was observed to haveA. cantonensis [4, 5]. The intensity and molecular biology of the observed parasites were not determined in previous studies. However, it is important to present stronger evidence regarding the presence ofA. cantonensis as it could be mistaken for other species ofAngiostrongylus. Furthermore, the intermediate host remains unknown in the region. This is an important key in assessing the infection ofA. cantonensis particularly in humans because these hosts harbor the infective stage of the parasite. Thus, this study was conducted to determine the extent of infection ofA. cantonensis among rats and snails collected from Muñoz.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Study Site

Muñoz is located in Nueva Ecija, Philippines, comprising of 37 villages with a total population of 85,461. It is globally positioned at 15.71°N latitude and 120.90° longitude E and has a total land area of 16,305 hectares which is mainly for agricultural utilization (9,819 hectares) followed by residential zone (2,847 ha) [6]. Five rice-farming villages were randomly selected for the study during June 2014-October 2015.


### 2.2. Harvest ofAngiostrongylus cantonensis in Rats

Single live capture traps were used for the collection of rats. Rats were euthanized and dissected for the presence ofA. cantonensis. The heart and lungs of the rat were examined for adult worms. Collected worms were preserved in 100% ethanol. AdultA. cantonensis were identified with the female having a barber pole appearance and male having a copulatory bursa [7]. Additionally, the organs were artificially digested with pepsin-HCl solution in a hot plate with magnetic stirrer at 37°C ± 2°C for one hour. It was filtered and placed in a petri dish for microscopic examination of larvae.


### 2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing of Adult Worms Recovered from Rats

The identification of obtained worms was performed using the standard molecular barcode of soil nematodes, the 5′ end of the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU rDNA) [8–10]. Total genomic DNA was extracted from adult worms using PureLink® Genomic DNA (Life Technologies) kit. The SSU rDNA gene was amplified through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the following primers: SSU_F_07 (sense) 5′-AAAGATTAAGCCATGCATG-3′ and SSU_R_09 (anti-sense) 5′-AGCTGGAATTACCGCGGCTG-3′ [10]. A total of 50 μL of PCR mix was prepared consisting of 5 μL PCR buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1.0 μL 10 mM dNTP, 2.5 μL 10 μM of each primer, 10 μL Q buffer (Qiagen, Netherlands), 0.25 μL 1.25 T Taq (Roche™, USA), and 4 μL DNA sample. The amplification was performed using Labnet MultiGene™ thermocycler with PCR conditions of 94°C for three minutes, 43 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 45°C for 30 seconds, and 65°C for one minute, the final extension at 72°C for five minutes. PCR products were visualized in 1% agarose gel with ethidium bromide under ultraviolet illumination. Qiagen™ Gel Extraction Kit (USA) was used to extract the PCR products from the gel. The purified PCR products were sent to 1st Base, Malaysia, for sequencing of the antisense strands. DNA sequences were assembled using STADEN package version 1.5.3 [11] and aligned using BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor 7.0.9.0 [12]. The species with the closest SSU rDNA sequence from GenBank for each nematode sequence was determined using the nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST, http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi/, [13]).


### 2.4. Collection of Potential Intermediate Snail Hosts

Freshwater snails were handpicked from rivers, rice fields, irrigations, and around houses while terrestrial snails were handpicked along walls and trees. All collected snails were placed in labeled containers and transferred to the laboratory for identification and parasite examination. Each snail was chopped into small pieces and placed in a petri dish containing Ash’s digestive fluid [14]. It was left overnight at 37°C and live larvae were observed under a microscope.A. cantonensisthird stage larvae (L3) were identified with their two chitinous rods at the anterior end and a slightly curved and pointed tail [7].


### 2.5. Survey on Knowledge and Practices of Locals on Parasites from Rats and Snails

One hundred respondents in the study site were interviewed and a questionnaire was given out to each respondent. The respondents include farmers and housewives which are people that have high chances of gettingA. cantonensis.


### 2.6. Data Analyses

Prevalence and mean intensity were computed for both rats and snails. Index of discrepancy was used to determine the distribution pattern ofA. cantonensis in both rat species [15]. Furthermore, chi-square test of independence and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the prevalence between rat species whereas Mann Whitney U test was used to compare intensities between rat species. All statistical analyses were performed at 95% confidence level using several statistical analysis software programs including Quantitative Parasitology version 3.0 and Predictive Analysis Software version 18.0 both for Windows.


## 2.1. Study Site

Muñoz is located in Nueva Ecija, Philippines, comprising of 37 villages with a total population of 85,461. It is globally positioned at 15.71°N latitude and 120.90° longitude E and has a total land area of 16,305 hectares which is mainly for agricultural utilization (9,819 hectares) followed by residential zone (2,847 ha) [6]. Five rice-farming villages were randomly selected for the study during June 2014-October 2015.


## 2.2. Harvest ofAngiostrongylus cantonensis in Rats

Single live capture traps were used for the collection of rats. Rats were euthanized and dissected for the presence ofA. cantonensis. The heart and lungs of the rat were examined for adult worms. Collected worms were preserved in 100% ethanol. AdultA. cantonensis were identified with the female having a barber pole appearance and male having a copulatory bursa [7]. Additionally, the organs were artificially digested with pepsin-HCl solution in a hot plate with magnetic stirrer at 37°C ± 2°C for one hour. It was filtered and placed in a petri dish for microscopic examination of larvae.


## 2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing of Adult Worms Recovered from Rats

The identification of obtained worms was performed using the standard molecular barcode of soil nematodes, the 5′ end of the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU rDNA) [8–10]. Total genomic DNA was extracted from adult worms using PureLink® Genomic DNA (Life Technologies) kit. The SSU rDNA gene was amplified through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the following primers: SSU_F_07 (sense) 5′-AAAGATTAAGCCATGCATG-3′ and SSU_R_09 (anti-sense) 5′-AGCTGGAATTACCGCGGCTG-3′ [10]. A total of 50 μL of PCR mix was prepared consisting of 5 μL PCR buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1.0 μL 10 mM dNTP, 2.5 μL 10 μM of each primer, 10 μL Q buffer (Qiagen, Netherlands), 0.25 μL 1.25 T Taq (Roche™, USA), and 4 μL DNA sample. The amplification was performed using Labnet MultiGene™ thermocycler with PCR conditions of 94°C for three minutes, 43 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 45°C for 30 seconds, and 65°C for one minute, the final extension at 72°C for five minutes. PCR products were visualized in 1% agarose gel with ethidium bromide under ultraviolet illumination. Qiagen™ Gel Extraction Kit (USA) was used to extract the PCR products from the gel. The purified PCR products were sent to 1st Base, Malaysia, for sequencing of the antisense strands. DNA sequences were assembled using STADEN package version 1.5.3 [11] and aligned using BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor 7.0.9.0 [12]. The species with the closest SSU rDNA sequence from GenBank for each nematode sequence was determined using the nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST, http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi/, [13]).


## 2.4. Collection of Potential Intermediate Snail Hosts

Freshwater snails were handpicked from rivers, rice fields, irrigations, and around houses while terrestrial snails were handpicked along walls and trees. All collected snails were placed in labeled containers and transferred to the laboratory for identification and parasite examination. Each snail was chopped into small pieces and placed in a petri dish containing Ash’s digestive fluid [14]. It was left overnight at 37°C and live larvae were observed under a microscope.A. cantonensisthird stage larvae (L3) were identified with their two chitinous rods at the anterior end and a slightly curved and pointed tail [7].


## 2.5. Survey on Knowledge and Practices of Locals on Parasites from Rats and Snails

One hundred respondents in the study site were interviewed and a questionnaire was given out to each respondent. The respondents include farmers and housewives which are people that have high chances of gettingA. cantonensis.


## 2.6. Data Analyses

Prevalence and mean intensity were computed for both rats and snails. Index of discrepancy was used to determine the distribution pattern ofA. cantonensis in both rat species [15]. Furthermore, chi-square test of independence and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the prevalence between rat species whereas Mann Whitney U test was used to compare intensities between rat species. All statistical analyses were performed at 95% confidence level using several statistical analysis software programs including Quantitative Parasitology version 3.0 and Predictive Analysis Software version 18.0 both for Windows.


## 3. Results

A total of 209 rats, 781 freshwater snails, and 120 terrestrial snails were collected and examined forA. cantonensis infection. The rats were identified asR. norvegicus (n=24) andR. tanezumi (n=185). The freshwater snails were grouped according to their species:Indoplanorbis exustus (n=14),Jagora asperata (n=7),Melanoides maculata (n=89),Pomacea canaliculata (n=200),Radix quadrasi (n=138),Tarebia granifera (n=108),Vivipara angularis (n=41), andVivipara carinata (n=184). Moreover, all terrestrial snails collected were identified asAchatina fulica (n=120).


### 3.1. SSU rDNA Gene Sequences Detected in Adult Worms from Rats

Seven representative adult female worms were successfully subjected to DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing. Floyd et al. [8] proposed that two sequences belong to the same species when they are 99.5–100% identical for the 450 bp of the 5′ end of the SSU rDNA gene. Thus,A. cantonensis was identified with certainty to species level based on GenBank BLAST results (Table 1).Table 1
Adult worm sequences obtained in the study and their closest match in GenBank.
Sequence
Closest match
Identity
RN (4BDYKU3S01R)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
100%
RT1 (4BEG550U016)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
99.8%
RT2 (4BER379J016)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
100%
RT3 (4BEW135B016)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
100%
RT4 (4BEYNXB6016)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
99.8%
RT5 (4FJJJW6R013)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
99.8%
RT6 (4FJNEHJH013)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
99.8%


### 3.2.Angiostrongylus cantonensis Infection in Rats

A total of 64 rats (31%) were found to be infected withA. cantonensis (Table 2). The rats belonging toR. norvegicus showed 46% (11/24) prevalence forA. cantonensis infection whileR. tanezumi showed 29% (53/185) prevalence. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the rat species (χ2=0.086, P>0.05). Furthermore, intensity ofA. cantonensis forR. tanezumi (62 parasite/rat) is higher thanR. norvegicus (43 parasite/rat) and also showed no significant differences (U=286.5; P>0.05).Table 2
Rats examined forAngiostrongylus cantonensis infection in Muñoz, Nueva Ecija.
Rats
Sites
Total
Prevalence (%)
Bantug
Catalanacan
Matingkis
Sapang Cawayan
Villa Nati
Rattus norvegicus
8 (4)
3 (1)
5 (2)
4 (1)
4 (3)
24 (11)
46
Rattus tanezumi
34 (13)
31 (1)
28 (11)
54 (14)
38 (14)
185 (53)
29
Total
42 (17)
34 (2)
33 (13)
58 (15)
42 (17)
209 (64)
31


### 3.3.Angiostrongylus cantonensis from Snails

A total of 84 snails (9%) were found infected with nematode larvae (Table3). However, onlyM. maculata (1/89) andP. canaliculata (3/200) harbored theA. cantonensis L3. These infected snails were collected from rice fields and irrigation.Table 3
Snails examined forAngiostrongylus cantonensis infection in Muñoz, Nueva Ecija.
(a)
Snails
⁢Sites
Total
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
Infected with other nematodes
Bantug
Catalanacan
Matingkis
Sapang Cawayan
Villa Nati
Freshwater
Indoplanorbis exustus
1
1
10
0
2
14
-
-
Jagora asperata
2
1
0
4
0
7
-
-
Melanoides maculata
20
18
12
21 (1)
18
89
+
-
Pomacea canaliculata
25
37
37
76 (1)
25 (2)
200
+
+
Radix quadrasi
22
24
39
20
33
138
-
+
Tarebia granifera
13
7
0
88
0
108
-
+
Vivipara angularis
1
0
25
7
8
41
-
+
Vivipara carinata
31
29
15
66
43
184
-
+
Total
115
117
138
282
129
781
(b)
Snails
Sites
Total
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
Infected with other nematodes
Bagong Sicat
Poblacion East
Poblacion North
Poblacion South
Terrestrial
Achatina fulica
30
30
30
30
120
-
+


### 3.4. Distribution of Rats and Snails in Muñoz

The distribution map revealed that the sampling points for infected rats and snails overlap implying potential hosts occurring in the same area (Figure1). The map also showed that the selected villages have rats and snails harboringA. cantonensis and other parasites. Two villages, namely, Sapang Cawayan and Villa Nati have the known definitive and intermediate hosts ofA. cantonensis. However, there are also villages which haveA. cantonensis infected rats but noA. cantonensis infected snails.Figure 1
Map of Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, showing the distribution ofAngiostrongylus cantonensis infected rats and snails.


### 3.5. Knowledge and Practices of Locals on Parasites from Rats and Snails

One hundred respondents from Muñoz consisting of adult males (n=72) and females (n=28) were interviewed for the study (Table 4). According to the survey, most of the respondents eat rat. The local people believe that it cures skin diseases. Apparently, most of the locals have eaten rat meat once or twice especially when they were still young. Some of them also made their children eat rat meat primarily because of its presumed medicinal property. Meanwhile, most of the locals usually eatR. quadrasi,M. maculata, andVivipara species and a few of them eatP. canaliculata. In addition, locals are not aware that ingestion of snails with parasites can cause diseases in humans.Table 4
Response of the local people in Muñoz, Nueva Ecija regarding awareness on parasitic diseases from rats and snails.
Question
Response (%)
Eat rats
Yes
60
No
40
Difference of rat species
Yes
98
No
2
Eat snails
Yes
84
No
16
Snail species as food
Birabid (R. quadrasi)
41
Susong pilipit/palipit (M. maculata)
71
Susong papa (Vivipara sp.)
69
Golden apple snail (P. canaliculata)
15
Source of snail
River
52
Irrigation
53
Rice field
40
Fish Pond
20
Small creek
16
Other animals from the field as source of food
Frog
53
Igat (eel)
35
Tulya (shellfish)
77
Fish
11
Talangka (crab)
20
Awareness of disease associated with eating snails
Yes
5
No
95


## 3.1. SSU rDNA Gene Sequences Detected in Adult Worms from Rats

Seven representative adult female worms were successfully subjected to DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing. Floyd et al. [8] proposed that two sequences belong to the same species when they are 99.5–100% identical for the 450 bp of the 5′ end of the SSU rDNA gene. Thus,A. cantonensis was identified with certainty to species level based on GenBank BLAST results (Table 1).Table 1
Adult worm sequences obtained in the study and their closest match in GenBank.
Sequence
Closest match
Identity
RN (4BDYKU3S01R)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
100%
RT1 (4BEG550U016)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
99.8%
RT2 (4BER379J016)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
100%
RT3 (4BEW135B016)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
100%
RT4 (4BEYNXB6016)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
99.8%
RT5 (4FJJJW6R013)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
99.8%
RT6 (4FJNEHJH013)
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
99.8%


## 3.2.Angiostrongylus cantonensis Infection in Rats

A total of 64 rats (31%) were found to be infected withA. cantonensis (Table 2). The rats belonging toR. norvegicus showed 46% (11/24) prevalence forA. cantonensis infection whileR. tanezumi showed 29% (53/185) prevalence. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the rat species (χ2=0.086, P>0.05). Furthermore, intensity ofA. cantonensis forR. tanezumi (62 parasite/rat) is higher thanR. norvegicus (43 parasite/rat) and also showed no significant differences (U=286.5; P>0.05).Table 2
Rats examined forAngiostrongylus cantonensis infection in Muñoz, Nueva Ecija.
Rats
Sites
Total
Prevalence (%)
Bantug
Catalanacan
Matingkis
Sapang Cawayan
Villa Nati
Rattus norvegicus
8 (4)
3 (1)
5 (2)
4 (1)
4 (3)
24 (11)
46
Rattus tanezumi
34 (13)
31 (1)
28 (11)
54 (14)
38 (14)
185 (53)
29
Total
42 (17)
34 (2)
33 (13)
58 (15)
42 (17)
209 (64)
31


## 3.3.Angiostrongylus cantonensis from Snails

A total of 84 snails (9%) were found infected with nematode larvae (Table3). However, onlyM. maculata (1/89) andP. canaliculata (3/200) harbored theA. cantonensis L3. These infected snails were collected from rice fields and irrigation.Table 3
Snails examined forAngiostrongylus cantonensis infection in Muñoz, Nueva Ecija.
(a)
Snails
⁢Sites
Total
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
Infected with other nematodes
Bantug
Catalanacan
Matingkis
Sapang Cawayan
Villa Nati
Freshwater
Indoplanorbis exustus
1
1
10
0
2
14
-
-
Jagora asperata
2
1
0
4
0
7
-
-
Melanoides maculata
20
18
12
21 (1)
18
89
+
-
Pomacea canaliculata
25
37
37
76 (1)
25 (2)
200
+
+
Radix quadrasi
22
24
39
20
33
138
-
+
Tarebia granifera
13
7
0
88
0
108
-
+
Vivipara angularis
1
0
25
7
8
41
-
+
Vivipara carinata
31
29
15
66
43
184
-
+
Total
115
117
138
282
129
781
(b)
Snails
Sites
Total
Angiostrongylus cantonensis
Infected with other nematodes
Bagong Sicat
Poblacion East
Poblacion North
Poblacion South
Terrestrial
Achatina fulica
30
30
30
30
120
-
+


## 3.4. Distribution of Rats and Snails in Muñoz

The distribution map revealed that the sampling points for infected rats and snails overlap implying potential hosts occurring in the same area (Figure1). The map also showed that the selected villages have rats and snails harboringA. cantonensis and other parasites. Two villages, namely, Sapang Cawayan and Villa Nati have the known definitive and intermediate hosts ofA. cantonensis. However, there are also villages which haveA. cantonensis infected rats but noA. cantonensis infected snails.Figure 1
Map of Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, showing the distribution ofAngiostrongylus cantonensis infected rats and snails.


## 3.5. Knowledge and Practices of Locals on Parasites from Rats and Snails

One hundred respondents from Muñoz consisting of adult males (n=72) and females (n=28) were interviewed for the study (Table 4). According to the survey, most of the respondents eat rat. The local people believe that it cures skin diseases. Apparently, most of the locals have eaten rat meat once or twice especially when they were still young. Some of them also made their children eat rat meat primarily because of its presumed medicinal property. Meanwhile, most of the locals usually eatR. quadrasi,M. maculata, andVivipara species and a few of them eatP. canaliculata. In addition, locals are not aware that ingestion of snails with parasites can cause diseases in humans.Table 4
Response of the local people in Muñoz, Nueva Ecija regarding awareness on parasitic diseases from rats and snails.
Question
Response (%)
Eat rats
Yes
60
No
40
Difference of rat species
Yes
98
No
2
Eat snails
Yes
84
No
16
Snail species as food
Birabid (R. quadrasi)
41
Susong pilipit/palipit (M. maculata)
71
Susong papa (Vivipara sp.)
69
Golden apple snail (P. canaliculata)
15
Source of snail
River
52
Irrigation
53
Rice field
40
Fish Pond
20
Small creek
16
Other animals from the field as source of food
Frog
53
Igat (eel)
35
Tulya (shellfish)
77
Fish
11
Talangka (crab)
20
Awareness of disease associated with eating snails
Yes
5
No
95


## 4. Discussion

Transmission ofAngiostrongylus cantonensis is very complex and difficult to assess. It involves parasitizing both warm- and cold-blooded animals which do not necessarily share the same spatial distribution and ecological requirements [16]. Furthermore, its larval stages are easily affected by different environmental factors such as temperature, oxygen, and pH as well as other factors such as host range and spatial and temporal variations. However, there is a need to further investigate its transmission in order to understand how to control and prevent its associated disease.The importance of fast and accurate diagnostic tools for diseases caused by nematodes lies on the knowledge of their prevalence and geographical distribution [17] which is specifically true forA. cantonensis having nearly all mollusks as its intermediate host. Moreover, there are two other rat lungworms that have similar life cycle withA. cantonensis,A. malaysiensis, andA. mackerrasae. Most diagnoses of these nematodes are based on morphological characteristics; however, specific identification of these nematodes is unfeasible because of the similar descriptions on the size and body shapes among its species [17]. Hence, misidentification and misdiagnoses of these nematodes may result in the underestimation of their infections. That is why most works on nematodes have chosen rDNA regions because they are useful genetic markers for studies on diagnosis, systematics, and molecular evolution [17]. Thus, utilization of genetic markers is widely used in differentiating closely related species like in the case ofAngiostrongylus.In this study, the sampling sites were mainly comprised of agricultural areas whereR. tanezumi is abundant. Moreover, these sites are located in rice fields and water reservoirs which are perfect habitat for snails.R. tanezumi primarily consume insects, snails, slugs, and other invertebrates found in their habitats and they specifically survive on frogs and snails during non-rice periods [5]. This may have resulted in the increased contact ofR. tanezumi with possible intermediate hosts ofA. cantonensis leading to the transmission of the parasite. On the other hand,R. norvegicus is usually located in cities and towns and is less commonly found in cultivated areas [18]. Nevertheless, other factors may have also contributed to the prevalence and intensity ofA. cantonensis in both rat species such as the exposure of these rats to the intermediate hosts, behavior, and feeding habits of rats, as well as their genetic traits.The low prevalence ofA. cantonensis in freshwater snails in the study may has resulted from a number of factors such as the seasonal infection of rats withA. cantonensis. Based on a study by Antolin et al. [4], femaleR. tanezumi in PhilRice farms from Nueva Ecija were found to be infected withA. cantonensis during June to September. This could mean that the transmission of the parasite between its hosts may have happened during these months. In connection to this, snails for the study were collected during other months of the year. Furthermore, ecological characteristics ofP. canaliculata andM. maculata such as their benthic life cycle may also be accounted for the low prevalence ofA. cantonensis infection. According to Lv et al. [16], only a few species of freshwater snails naturally transmitA. cantonensis because rat feces containing its L1 are diluted in freshwater bodies. Previous studies suggest thatA. cantonensis infection in terrestrial snails and slugs are higher than freshwater snails [19–21]. In the present study, noA. cantonensis L3 was observed inA. fulica. The reason is unclear; however, possibilities exist such as effects of seasonal variations and habitat of hosts on the transmission of parasite. Based on observations,A. fulica becomes active when it starts to rain. In the study of Salibay and Luyon [22], fewer rats were caught in rainy days. This indicates that there may have been less contact between rats andA. fulica. Studies in other countries have shown thatA. fulica are naturally infected with the parasite [8, 17, 19, 23–25]. In the Philippines, few reports regardingA. cantonensis infection in snails can be found.A. fulica andLaevicaulis altae from Metro Manila were revealed to be infected withA. cantonensis [9, 10, 26] but other than the snail, no other reports have been made. This study, however, is the first record ofA. cantonensis infectedP. canaliculata andM. maculata in the Philippines.Maps may be used to predict the probability of animals occurring in an area [27–29] and in this case the rats and snails. Rodents exhibit territorial behavior [30]; however, both rat species have overlapping sampling points in the study. This may be due to residential areas being adjacent to agricultural lands.R. norvegicus is a major urban pest worldwide but it was also reported as a field pest in some parts of the Philippines. They are also often found close to water sources like rivers and irrigations [18]. Furthermore, Salibay and Luyon [22] revealed in their study thatR. norvegicus were mostly observed in areas whereR. tanezumi were also caught. The unusual change in habitat ofR. norvegicus from residential to agricultural is probably due to habitat alterations. Moreover, food consumption of rats can also be accounted for the captured rat distribution. When food is not available in their habitat, rats would either resort to cannibalism [5] or look for other sources of food. Meanwhile, snails were collected in rice fields, waterways, and near houses which can be easily accessed by rats. The locations ofA. cantonensis infected snails coincide with those ofA. cantonensisinfected rats. Hence, transmission of parasites between rats and snails has been occurring in the study sites.Eosinophilic meningitis is caused by several helminth and nonhelminth parasites [31] but the most common cause isA. cantonensis [32] which is linked to the introduction, farming, and consumption of some snail species. Meningitis was recorded as one of the leading causes of child mortality in the Philippines from 2001 to 2006 and 2008 to 2010 [33]. The analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as well as blood culture aids in their proper classification of CNS infections; however, it may not always be followed because of the limitations on the part of the patient. Thus, the final diagnosis is dependent on the assessment and opinion of the attending physician [34]. Even though the cases of meningitis were not solely based onA. cantonensis infection alone, the prevalence of the parasite is of concern and even more if diagnosis of the parasite in humans is neglected most of the times. In conclusion, human cases of angiostrongylosis have not been recorded in Muñoz but this could be due to the misdiagnoses and lack of readily available diagnostic tools. The presence of the parasite in potential hosts could not eliminate the possibility of its transmission to humans. Hence, public education regarding zoonotic parasites should be implemented. Proper handling of its intermediate hosts and crops that may be contaminated by its hosts should be practiced. Moreover,P. canaliculata andM. maculata should be further examined since it is in these populations that larvae ofA. cantonensis were observed. Other regions in the Philippines should also be evaluated particularly in those areas where rice planting is the main source of livelihood.



---

*Source: 3085639-2016-05-24.xml*