# On the Mechanical Properties of Hybrid Aluminium 7075 Matrix Composite Material Reinforced with SiC and TiC Produced by Powder Metallurgy Method

Authors: S. Pradeep Devaneyan; R. Ganesh; T. Senthilvelan
Journal: Indian Journal of Materials Science
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Metal matrix composites are widely used in components of various components of industrial equipment because of their superior material properties like high stiffness to weight ratio and high impact strength and fracture toughness while compared to the conventional material. Due to the concepts of high strength to low weight ratio, Al 7075 was extensively applied in aircraft engine and wings. Even if Al 7075 has higher hardness, higher strength, excellent wear resistance, and high-temperature corrosion protection, it is in need of further enhancement of properties for increasing its applicability. This paper presents the mechanical behavior of aluminium 7075 reinforced with Silicon Carbide (SiC) and Titanium Carbide (TiC) through powder metallurgy route. These specimens were produced by powder metallurgy method. The hybrid composite was made by Al 7075 alloy as the matrix with Silicon Carbide and Titanium Carbide as reinforcement. Silicon Carbide and Titanium Carbide are mixed in different weight ratio based on the design matrix formulated through a statistical tool, namely, Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Enhanced mechanical properties have been obtained with 90% of Al 7075, 4% of TiC, and 8% of SiC composition in the composite. Coefficient of friction appears to be more which has been determined by ring compression test.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Powder metallurgy is one of the fast emerging routes in the industrial application because of its advantages such as high dimensional control and avoids secondary machining operation. Powder metallurgy is the method of producing a component to a net shape or near net shape [1]. Density of the components can be controlled easily through powder metallurgy method when compared to other manufacturing processes [2, 3]. Aluminium 7075 is widely adopted in aircraft engines and wings, due to its advantageous properties such as high strength to low weight ratio, higher hardness, high strength, excellent wear resistance, and high-temperature corrosion protection [4]. Metal Matrix Composites (MMC) were highly known for their superior material properties like high stiffness to weight ratio and high impact strength and fracture toughness when compared to the conventional materials [5]. In the aerospace industry, metal matrix composite enables it to be applied extensively because of its superior properties [6]. Nanosized Silicon Carbide (SiC) when embedded in the metals exhibits higher hardness, higher wear resistance, and corrosion resistance [7]. Hence, nano-SiC particles can be embedded along with aluminium which is used to manufacture various machine elements like drive shafts, brake rotors, and brake drums in automobiles, for ventral fins and fuel access covers in aircraft to reduce wear. Similarly, nano-Titanium Carbide (TiC) possesses several advantages such as high specific strength, good corrosion resistance, and good wear property [1]. Along with these properties, Titanium Carbide has excellent strength to weight ratio which is particularly in need to the aerospace, chemical, and architectural industries. Literature reveals that MMC, in particular aluminium 7075 as matrix and SiC/TiC as reinforcement, increases the mechanical properties of aluminium [4]. Many researches were done through powder metallurgy by incorporating ceramic particles as reinforcements on pure aluminium whereas, in this work, a novel idea of reinforcing ceramic particles in aluminium 7075 alloy is attempted. Powders of aluminium 7075 were generated through ball milling for this work. This paper focuses on further enhancement of the properties of aluminium 7075 alloy through powder metallurgy process by incorporating SiC and TiC as a hybrid reinforcement.


## 2. Fabrication by Powder Metallurgy

RSM is a collection of mathematical and statistical techniques that are useful for the modeling and analysis of problems in which a response of interest is influenced by several variables and the objective is to optimize this response [1]. The Design Expert version 7 software was used to develop the design matrix for conducting the experimentation and same software was used to optimize the process parameters [8]. Table 1 shows the design matrix with coded value and actual values of the process parameters selected in this work. Al 7075 rod of 25 mm in diameter was turned in lathe machine and scraps are collected with the ball milling; the scraps are made as the powder [9]. By using the Design Expert software, SiC and TiC were added according to the matrix along with Al 7075 and the mixture was blended well. The mixed powders of varying proportions were shown in Figure 1.Table 1
Design matrix formulated by RSM.
Actual value Coded value % of Al % of SiC % of TiC % of Al % of SiC % of TiC 100 0 8 1 1 −1 80 8 8 −1 −1 −1 90 4 0 0 0 1 100 0 0 1 1 1 80 0 8 −1 1 −1 90 0 4 0 1 0 90 4 4 0 0 0 80 8 0 −1 −1 1 90 4 4 0 0 0 100 8 8 1 −1 −1 90 4 4 0 0 0 90 8 4 0 −1 0 90 4 8 0 0 −1 90 4 4 0 0 0 100 8 0 1 −1 1Figure 1
Blended powders based on design matrix.The blended powder was poured into the die and compacted in certain pressure (20–25 tonnes) using universal testing machine which was shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Compaction process in UTM machine.The green compact was sintered in the furnace at 75% of the melting point of Al 7075 (550°C) and then the sample was allowed to cool for 8 hours in the furnace. Sintered samples were shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Sintered samples based on design matrix. (1) 100% of Al, 0% of SiC, and 8% of TiC. (2) 80% of Al, 8% of SiC, and 8% of TiC. (3) 90% of Al, 4% of SiC, and 0% of TiC. (4) 100% of Al, 0% of SiC, and 0% of TiC. (5) 80% of Al, 0% of SiC, and 8% of TiC. (6) 90% of Al, 0% of SiC, and 4% of TiC. (7) 90% of Al, 4% of SiC, and 4% of TiC. (8) 80% of Al, 8% of SiC, and 0% of TiC. (9) 100% of Al, 8% of SiC, and 8% of TiC. (10) 90% of Al, 8% of SiC, and 4% of TiC. (11) 90% of Al, 4% of SiC, and 8% of TiC. (12) 100% Al, 8% of SiC, and 0% of TiC. (13) 80% of Al, 4% of SiC, and 4% of TiC. (14) 100% of Al, 0% of SiC, and 0% of TiC. (15) 100% Al, 4% of SiC, and 4% of TiC.


## 3. Mechanical Tests

### 3.1. Microhardness

The hardness of the sample was measured using a micro-Vickers hardness measuring machine and a load of 1.962 N was applied for 10 seconds. To avoid error possibility, a minimum of five hardness readings were taken for each sample and they were averaged. Theoretically, the hardness should be uniform throughout sample prepared, if the particles distribution was uniform throughout compaction. The experimentation result shows that the Vickers hardness of the compaction was varying from 33.2 HV to 55.2 HV. The highest hardness value (52.12) obtained for sample 11 was produced with the combination of 90% of Al, 4% of SiC, and 8% of TiC.


### 3.2. Ring Compression Test

The specimens were machined as per the standard ratio of 6 : 3 : 2 for the ring compression test to facilitate the measurement of coefficient of friction. As per the standard proportions ratio (6 : 3 : 2), the outer diameter of the specimens has been taken as 20 mm and inner diameter as 10 mm with the initial height of 6.6 mm. The specimens prepared were shown in Figure4.Figure 4
Specimens prepared for ring compression test.Universal testing machine was utilized for conducting ring compression test and case hardened steel plate was utilized to apply a maximum load of 200 KN and the rings were compressed. The lubricant, zinc stearate was applied to the top, bottom, and lateral surfaces of the ring specimen before testing. The dimensions of outer and inner diameters of each samples were measured using Vernier caliper after the test. However, because of barreling and irregularity on both outer and inner cylindrical surfaces of the specimen, several diametric readings were taken and a median value was recorded. Figure5 shows deformation of specimen after carrying ring compression test.Figure 5
Deformation of specimen after ring compression testing.


## 3.1. Microhardness

The hardness of the sample was measured using a micro-Vickers hardness measuring machine and a load of 1.962 N was applied for 10 seconds. To avoid error possibility, a minimum of five hardness readings were taken for each sample and they were averaged. Theoretically, the hardness should be uniform throughout sample prepared, if the particles distribution was uniform throughout compaction. The experimentation result shows that the Vickers hardness of the compaction was varying from 33.2 HV to 55.2 HV. The highest hardness value (52.12) obtained for sample 11 was produced with the combination of 90% of Al, 4% of SiC, and 8% of TiC.


## 3.2. Ring Compression Test

The specimens were machined as per the standard ratio of 6 : 3 : 2 for the ring compression test to facilitate the measurement of coefficient of friction. As per the standard proportions ratio (6 : 3 : 2), the outer diameter of the specimens has been taken as 20 mm and inner diameter as 10 mm with the initial height of 6.6 mm. The specimens prepared were shown in Figure4.Figure 4
Specimens prepared for ring compression test.Universal testing machine was utilized for conducting ring compression test and case hardened steel plate was utilized to apply a maximum load of 200 KN and the rings were compressed. The lubricant, zinc stearate was applied to the top, bottom, and lateral surfaces of the ring specimen before testing. The dimensions of outer and inner diameters of each samples were measured using Vernier caliper after the test. However, because of barreling and irregularity on both outer and inner cylindrical surfaces of the specimen, several diametric readings were taken and a median value was recorded. Figure5 shows deformation of specimen after carrying ring compression test.Figure 5
Deformation of specimen after ring compression testing.


## 4. Results and Discussion

### 4.1. Microhardness Results

The results of microhardness test of the samples produced through powder metallurgy of Al 7075 alloy reinforced with nano-SiC and nano TiC were shown in Figure6. The microhardness results of the samples are attributed to the fact that pure aluminium 7075 shows lowest microhardness when compared to other samples reinforced with SiC and TiC. Incorporation of TiC alone in the aluminium matrix leads to the higher microhardness value which is evident in sample 1 which has 100% of Al, 0% of SiC, and 8% of TiC. However, addition of SiC increases the microhardness value which can be noted in sample 8 which was produced with 100% of Al, 8% of SiC, and 8% of TiC.Figure 6
Microhardness of the samples.Figure7 shows indentation of the microhardness test of pure aluminium. Figure 8 shows the indentation of sample 10 which was produced with 100% of Al, 8% of SiC, and 8% of TiC. It is evident from these figures that the hardness of the composite material was much higher than that of the pure metal. It was observed that the hardness of the composite material increases with the increase in weight% of TiC and SiC content. The addition of TiC and SiC makes the ductile Al 7075 alloy into more brittle in nature. Similarly, the incorporation of TiC and SiC in the aluminium matrix enhances the hardness of the samples. Hardness test image of specimen 10 with composition of 100% of Al, 8% of SiC, and 8% of TiC was shown in Figure 8.Figure 7
Indentation image of the sample produced with 100% of Al, 0% of SiC, and 0% of TiC (pure aluminium).Figure 8
Indentation image of the sample produced with 100% of Al, 8% of SiC, and 8% of TiC.


### 4.2. Ring Compression Test

Ring compression test is the most applied method for finding contact conditions in the bulk deformation process. Hence in this work, coefficient of friction was calculated by adopting ring compression test [10]. Coefficient of friction is determined by A.G. Male and M.G. Cockroft calibration chart by measuring the percentage change in the internal diameter of the specimen after compaction [11]. When the hollow short cylinder is compressed by universal testing machine with a flat, parallel, and rigid plates, the diameter of the hole may either increase or decrease depending upon the amount of friction offered by the material [12]. Imposing the coefficient of friction values of all the samples on the calibration chart clearly depicts that pure aluminium sample has highest coefficient of friction value when compared to other samples. It is attributed to the higher ductility of pure aluminium and subsequently its sticking friction nature. This higher coefficient of friction would have detrimental effect especially when MMC produced by powder metallurgy route are subjected to forging [13]. Coefficient of friction calibration curve is shown in Figure 9.Figure 9
Coefficient of friction calibration curve.


### 4.3. Surface Contours of RSM

The plot shown in Figure10 is attributed to the fact that when wt% of SiC is increased, it leads to increase in the hardness value of the compacted specimen. It also reveals that SiC incorporation leads to better hardness in such a way that amount of SiC added during the process is directly proportional to increase hardness value. Figure 11 shows surface contour representation of amount of Al 7075 and amount of TiC versus hardness value.Figure 10
Surface contour representation of Al 7075 and SiC versus microhardness.Figure 11
Surface contour representation of Al 7075 and TiC versus microhardness.Figure12 shows surface contour representation of amount of aluminium and the amount of TiC versus hardness value. It indicates that with the increase in amount of TiC the MMC increases the hardness value of the specimen gradually. Hence incorporation of TiC in the aluminium matrix is directly proportional to hardness value [8].Figure 12
Surface contour representation of SiC and TiC versus microhardness.These plots reveals that increase in the % of SiC and TiC leads to further increases in the hardness value which brings to a conclusion that increase in the percentage of SiC and TiC is directly proportional to hardness value [9].


## 4.1. Microhardness Results

The results of microhardness test of the samples produced through powder metallurgy of Al 7075 alloy reinforced with nano-SiC and nano TiC were shown in Figure6. The microhardness results of the samples are attributed to the fact that pure aluminium 7075 shows lowest microhardness when compared to other samples reinforced with SiC and TiC. Incorporation of TiC alone in the aluminium matrix leads to the higher microhardness value which is evident in sample 1 which has 100% of Al, 0% of SiC, and 8% of TiC. However, addition of SiC increases the microhardness value which can be noted in sample 8 which was produced with 100% of Al, 8% of SiC, and 8% of TiC.Figure 6
Microhardness of the samples.Figure7 shows indentation of the microhardness test of pure aluminium. Figure 8 shows the indentation of sample 10 which was produced with 100% of Al, 8% of SiC, and 8% of TiC. It is evident from these figures that the hardness of the composite material was much higher than that of the pure metal. It was observed that the hardness of the composite material increases with the increase in weight% of TiC and SiC content. The addition of TiC and SiC makes the ductile Al 7075 alloy into more brittle in nature. Similarly, the incorporation of TiC and SiC in the aluminium matrix enhances the hardness of the samples. Hardness test image of specimen 10 with composition of 100% of Al, 8% of SiC, and 8% of TiC was shown in Figure 8.Figure 7
Indentation image of the sample produced with 100% of Al, 0% of SiC, and 0% of TiC (pure aluminium).Figure 8
Indentation image of the sample produced with 100% of Al, 8% of SiC, and 8% of TiC.


## 4.2. Ring Compression Test

Ring compression test is the most applied method for finding contact conditions in the bulk deformation process. Hence in this work, coefficient of friction was calculated by adopting ring compression test [10]. Coefficient of friction is determined by A.G. Male and M.G. Cockroft calibration chart by measuring the percentage change in the internal diameter of the specimen after compaction [11]. When the hollow short cylinder is compressed by universal testing machine with a flat, parallel, and rigid plates, the diameter of the hole may either increase or decrease depending upon the amount of friction offered by the material [12]. Imposing the coefficient of friction values of all the samples on the calibration chart clearly depicts that pure aluminium sample has highest coefficient of friction value when compared to other samples. It is attributed to the higher ductility of pure aluminium and subsequently its sticking friction nature. This higher coefficient of friction would have detrimental effect especially when MMC produced by powder metallurgy route are subjected to forging [13]. Coefficient of friction calibration curve is shown in Figure 9.Figure 9
Coefficient of friction calibration curve.


## 4.3. Surface Contours of RSM

The plot shown in Figure10 is attributed to the fact that when wt% of SiC is increased, it leads to increase in the hardness value of the compacted specimen. It also reveals that SiC incorporation leads to better hardness in such a way that amount of SiC added during the process is directly proportional to increase hardness value. Figure 11 shows surface contour representation of amount of Al 7075 and amount of TiC versus hardness value.Figure 10
Surface contour representation of Al 7075 and SiC versus microhardness.Figure 11
Surface contour representation of Al 7075 and TiC versus microhardness.Figure12 shows surface contour representation of amount of aluminium and the amount of TiC versus hardness value. It indicates that with the increase in amount of TiC the MMC increases the hardness value of the specimen gradually. Hence incorporation of TiC in the aluminium matrix is directly proportional to hardness value [8].Figure 12
Surface contour representation of SiC and TiC versus microhardness.These plots reveals that increase in the % of SiC and TiC leads to further increases in the hardness value which brings to a conclusion that increase in the percentage of SiC and TiC is directly proportional to hardness value [9].


## 5. Conclusions

Based on the study conducted on the TiC and SiC containing Al 7075 composite material, the following conclusions have been arrived.By measuring the microhardness with various samples a reasonable comparison could be made and out of them the results were improved for various compositions. The higher value of microhardness was 52.12 HV which can be obtained with 90% of Al 7075, 4% of SiC, and 8% of TiC. The ring compression test reveals that the sample with 90% of Al 7075, 4% of SiC, and 4% TiC of density has lowest coefficient of friction than that of the other samples. This is due to the addition of SiC and TiC which leads to the increase in wear resistance of the MMC. In sample, 100% of Al 7075, 0% of SiC, and 0% of TiC, the maximum value of coefficient of friction was attained and similarly, it experiences lowest microhardness. This phenomena clearly depicts the fact that incorporation of SiC and TiC along the aluminium matrix increases the wear resistant property of the alloy.



---

*Source: 3067257-2017-01-23.xml*