# Characterization of Native and Graft CopolymerizedAlbizia Gums and Their Application as a Flocculant

Authors: T. Adeniyi Afolabi; Daniel G. Adekanmi
Journal: Journal of Polymers
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

The functional properties and flocculation efficiency of purifiedAlbizia saman (AS) andAlbizia glaberrima (AG) gum exudates modified by graft copolymerization with acrylamide were investigated. The grafting efficiency ofAS andAG was 54 and 58%, respectively. The cold water-insoluble gel of nativeAS andAG was 38.23 and 35.55%, which increased to 39.75 and 40.55% after graft copolymerization. Graft copolymerization ofAS andAG gums reduced their oil binding and emulsion capacity from 4.89 and 3.44% to 3.69 and 2.40%, respectively. The dissolution kinetics of the native gums between 40 and 90°C and 0 and 150 min revealed a steady increase in solubility of the native gums from 6.05 to 9.53 g/L(AS) and 5.90 to 8.78 g/L(AG). The flocculation efficiency of the nativeAS andAG gums at 50 ppm concentration was 74.30 and 74.73%, which increased to 98.46% and 98.29% in the graft copolymerized gums, respectively.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The increase in world population has greatly influenced the expansion and sophistication of the industrial growth, with its concomitant environmental hazard. One of these hazards is water pollution by industrial and agricultural waste systems. The generation of wastewater which contains very fine suspended solids, organic and inorganic particles, dissolved solids, metals, and other impurities is harmful to the environment with major health issues in various organisms. These impurities have a very small particle size and rarely settle down; hence their filtration is very difficult and expensive. Among the several traditional and advanced technologies applied for the removal of colloidal particles from wastewater [1], flocculation is one of the most widely used solid-liquid separation process [1–3].Lee et al. [3] classified flocculants used in wastewater treatments as chemical coagulants/flocculants, natural bioflocculants, and grafted flocculants. The chemical coagulants/flocculants include coagulants which are inorganic metal salts and flocculants which are synthetic organic polymers. Grafted flocculants (or graft copolymers) include synthetic polymers and natural polymers such as chitosan, cellulose, starch, and gums. The natural bioflocculants are chitosan, cellulose, sodium alginate, tannin, gums, and mucilage.The presence of residual metal concentration in treated water and poor flocculating efficiency is the major disadvantage of using inorganic coagulants despite their low cost and ease of use [1]. Similarly, lack of biodegradability and dispersion of monomers residue in treated water negate the wide application of organic polymeric flocculants because of its associated health hazards [4]. Hence, biopolymers based flocculants are gaining much interest by researchers because they are biodegradable and environmentally friendly [1, 3]. One of such biopolymers is gum.Gums are widely used as flocculants in water treatment because they are nontoxic, biodegradable, and effective [5]. Their efficiency as flocculants is largely dependent on the gum’s molecular ability to trap suspended particles to form flocs. Gums are believed to be produced through metabolic activity, as a protective mechanism against pathological conditions or as a consequence of infection on the plant by microorganisms [6]. Gums and other natural flocculants are however needed in large dosage due to their moderate flocculating efficiency and shorter shelf life [3]. Hence, polysaccharides are grafted with synthetic polymers, such as acrylamide, to obtain tailor-made grafted flocculants with specialized functions [7].Extensive studies have been carried out on polysaccharide gums because they are sustainable, biodegradable, and biosafe [8, 9]. The most utilized gum with diverse industrial application is gum arabic [9, 10]. The demand for major gums such as gum arabic, guar gum, and xanthan gum for applications in the food, pharmaceutical, and allied industries has led to the concomitant increase in their cost. New inexpensive gum exudates obtained from diverse plants have attracted the attention of researchers for a wide range of industrial applications [8, 9, 11, 12]. Hence, the need to search for gums from lesser known and underutilized plants species such asAlbizia,which will be economical and readily available, has become expedient.Albizia (family: Fabaceae; subfamily: Mimosoideae) is a genus of about 150 species of mostly fast growing subtropical and tropical trees and shrubs occurring in Africa, Asia, Australia, and America [13].Albizia trees are a good source of gums, and its gums have been explored as a suitable substitute for gum arabic as a natural emulsifier for foods and pharmaceuticals [14]. Dabhade et al. [15] reported the extraction of proteinaceous trypsin inhibitor from seeds ofAlbizia amara and its potentials as an antimicrobial agent. Leaf extracts fromAG [16] andAlbizia gummifera [17] were investigated for their neuropharmacological and antimicrobial effects, respectively. The phytochemical properties of the roots ofAG were investigated [18], while the gums ofAlbizia stipulata were used in the development of controlled-release tablets in cancer therapeutics [19].AS andAG are tree crops cultivated mainly for timber production in Nigeria, with huge gum exudates that are usually wasted. From literature search, records of characterization and industrial application ofAS andAG are scarce; hence the study of the functional properties and their industrial application as flocculants in waste water treatment may provide an efficient and functionally viable gum with industrial appeal.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials and Gum Purification

Gum exudates fromAS andAG were collected at the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria campus. Analar grade ceric ammonium nitrate and acrylamide were used without further purification. Bark-free impure gum exudates fromAS andAG were selected and soaked in water overnight, allowing them to hydrate sufficiently. The schematic diagram of the gum purification process is presented in Figure 1.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of theAlbizia gum’s purification.


### 2.2. Synthesis of Graft Copolymerized Gum

The purifiedAlbizia gums (5 g, on dry weight basis) were dissolved in 200 mL distilled water, and 25 g of acrylamide (dissolved in 250 mL water) was added to the dispersion. The suspension was thoroughly mixed for about 10 minutes with a blender and transferred to the reaction vessel, followed by the addition of 2 g ceric ammonium nitrate. The reaction was allowed to proceed at 65°C (using thermostatic water bath) until a gel-like mass was obtained. Unreacted acrylamide monomer was removed by the addition of excess acetone and methanol. The gel formed (graft copolymer) was collected, dried, pulverized, and sieved. The percentage grafting (% G) and percentage grafting efficiency (% GE) of the synthesized graft copolymers were evaluated:(1)%G=Weightofgraftcopolymer-WeightofpolysaccharideWeightofgum×100,(2)%GE=Weightofgraftcopolymer-WeightofgumWeightofmonomer×100.


### 2.3. FTIR Spectroscopy

The grafting reaction was confirmed by FTIR. The FTIR spectra of the native and acrylamide graftedAS andAG gum samples (using KBr pellets) were obtained with the aid of FTIR spectrometer (Nicolet Magna-IR 750, series II, Thermo Scientific, Portsmouth, NH, USA) at 400 to 4000 cm−1.


### 2.4. Proximate Composition

The AACC (2000) method was used in determining the ash content, fat (ether extract), and crude fiber of the gum samples. The bulk and tapped density determined gravimetrically was used to calculate the compressibility index, that is, Carr’s index (see (3)). Hausner’s ratio measures the cohesiveness of the exudate gum powder and was calculated using (4) [20]. (3)Carr’sIndex=Bulkdensity-TappeddensityBulkdensity×100,(4)Hausnerratio=TappedDensityBulkDensity.The oil binding capacity of the gum was determined gravimetrically using the method of Okezie and Bello [21]. The concentration of five minerals (sodium, manganese, lead, calcium, and and magnesium) was determined using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer AAS (Perkin-Elmer 305B).


### 2.5. Emulsion Capacity

The gum sample (0.25 g) was blended with 10 mL of distilled water at room temperature for 30 seconds. After complete dispersion, 10 mL of oil was added and blended for 5 minutes. The mixture was then quantitatively transferred to a centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 minutes. The volume of oil separated from the sample after centrifugation was read directly from the tube. Emulsification capacity, EC, expressed as mL of oil emulsified by 1 g samples, was calculated using(5)EC=HeightofemulsifiedlayerHeightofthewholesolutioninthecentrifugetube×100.


### 2.6. Cold and Hot Water-Insoluble Gel

A mixture of 1 g gum sample and 100 cm3 distilled water was thoroughly mixed for 1 hour. The mixture was then centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 15 minutes and the clear supernatant liquid discarded. The insoluble fraction was washed by adding distilled water and stirring for 3 minutes and recentrifuged at 1200 rpm for 15 minutes. This procedure was repeated four times, before transferring the insoluble fraction into a preweighed porcelain dish. The insoluble fraction was dried in an oven for 12 hours at 105°C, cooled in a desiccator, and weighed. The difference in weight gives the cold water-insoluble gel (CWIG).The hot water-insoluble gel (HWIG) determination was carried out by stirring 1 g of gum in 100 mL of distilled water for 30 minutes and heating the mixture in a water bath at 95°C for 1 hour; the mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 4 hours. Separation and determination of the HWIG were carried out as described for CWIG.


### 2.7. Intrinsic Viscosity

The specific viscosity of the 1% gum solutions (native and graft copolymerizedAS andAG) was measured with the Brookfield viscometer at 50, 60, and 100 rpm and calculated as follows: (6)ηsp=ηrel-1,ηred=ηspC,ηinh=ln⁡ηrelC.From the time of flow of polymer solutions (t) and that of the solvent (to, for distilled water), relative viscosity (ηrel=t/to) was obtained. The reduced viscosity (ηred) and the inherent viscosity (ηinh) were simultaneously plotted against concentration. “C” represents polymer concentration in g/dL. The intrinsic viscosity was obtained from the point of the intersection after extrapolation of two plots (i.e., ηred versus C and ηinh versus C) to zero concentration [22].


### 2.8. Solubility Capacity

A 1% gum solution (2.5 g of gum in 250 cm3 of water) was vigorously shaken in a thermostatically controlled water bath at 30°C for specified time interval (0, 30, 60, 90, 120, or 150 minutes). Then 20 cm3 is drawn out, allowed to cool, and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. Aliquots (10 cm3) of the supernatant were dried to constant weight at 105°C to determine the mass of the gum dissolved. The above experiment was repeated at 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80°C.


### 2.9. Flocculation Study

The flocculation test was done using the modified method of Rani et al. [22]. 100 mL of 0.25% Kaolin suspension was added to 10 ppm of the flocculant (native and acrylamide grafted gums). The suspension was stirred at 75 rpm for 3 minutes and 25 rpm for 7 minutes and then allowed to settle for 10 minutes. The absorbance of the supernatant liquids was measured with a UV-Visible spectrophotometer at 600 nm. Low absorbance value is indicative of good flocculation efficacy. The procedure was repeated for 30 and 50 ppm of the flocculants.


### 2.10. Metal Ion Sorption

Metal ion sorption was carried out by stirring 30 ppm (3 mg of gum in 100 mL of water) of the native and grafted gums and 100 mL solution containing 180 ppm of nickel ion (40 mg of Ni2SO4·6H2O in 100 mL of water) for 20 minutes, which was filtered, and its concentrations were determined with AAS. The metal ion concentration of the filtrate and its retention capacity were determined using (7) and (8), respectively [22].(7)Metalionuptake%=Initialconc.ofmetalion-finalconc.ofmetalionInitialconc.ofion×100%,(8)RetentionCapacityppm/mg=Initialconcofmetalion-finalconcofmetalionWeightofdrypolymer.where molar mass of Ni2SO4·6H2O and Ni is 262.85 g/mol and 58.7 g/mol, respectively, and conc. is the concentration.


### 2.11. Statistical Analysis

All determinations were carried out in triplicate and result was reported as the mean ± standard deviation. The swelling and solubility profile were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS (Version 16.0 software) to investigate the effect of pH and temperature on starch samples. TheShapiro-Wilk test of normality andLevene’s tests of homogenous variance were carried out to assess the assumptions of ANOVA in order to validate the results.


## 2.1. Materials and Gum Purification

Gum exudates fromAS andAG were collected at the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria campus. Analar grade ceric ammonium nitrate and acrylamide were used without further purification. Bark-free impure gum exudates fromAS andAG were selected and soaked in water overnight, allowing them to hydrate sufficiently. The schematic diagram of the gum purification process is presented in Figure 1.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of theAlbizia gum’s purification.


## 2.2. Synthesis of Graft Copolymerized Gum

The purifiedAlbizia gums (5 g, on dry weight basis) were dissolved in 200 mL distilled water, and 25 g of acrylamide (dissolved in 250 mL water) was added to the dispersion. The suspension was thoroughly mixed for about 10 minutes with a blender and transferred to the reaction vessel, followed by the addition of 2 g ceric ammonium nitrate. The reaction was allowed to proceed at 65°C (using thermostatic water bath) until a gel-like mass was obtained. Unreacted acrylamide monomer was removed by the addition of excess acetone and methanol. The gel formed (graft copolymer) was collected, dried, pulverized, and sieved. The percentage grafting (% G) and percentage grafting efficiency (% GE) of the synthesized graft copolymers were evaluated:(1)%G=Weightofgraftcopolymer-WeightofpolysaccharideWeightofgum×100,(2)%GE=Weightofgraftcopolymer-WeightofgumWeightofmonomer×100.


## 2.3. FTIR Spectroscopy

The grafting reaction was confirmed by FTIR. The FTIR spectra of the native and acrylamide graftedAS andAG gum samples (using KBr pellets) were obtained with the aid of FTIR spectrometer (Nicolet Magna-IR 750, series II, Thermo Scientific, Portsmouth, NH, USA) at 400 to 4000 cm−1.


## 2.4. Proximate Composition

The AACC (2000) method was used in determining the ash content, fat (ether extract), and crude fiber of the gum samples. The bulk and tapped density determined gravimetrically was used to calculate the compressibility index, that is, Carr’s index (see (3)). Hausner’s ratio measures the cohesiveness of the exudate gum powder and was calculated using (4) [20]. (3)Carr’sIndex=Bulkdensity-TappeddensityBulkdensity×100,(4)Hausnerratio=TappedDensityBulkDensity.The oil binding capacity of the gum was determined gravimetrically using the method of Okezie and Bello [21]. The concentration of five minerals (sodium, manganese, lead, calcium, and and magnesium) was determined using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer AAS (Perkin-Elmer 305B).


## 2.5. Emulsion Capacity

The gum sample (0.25 g) was blended with 10 mL of distilled water at room temperature for 30 seconds. After complete dispersion, 10 mL of oil was added and blended for 5 minutes. The mixture was then quantitatively transferred to a centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 minutes. The volume of oil separated from the sample after centrifugation was read directly from the tube. Emulsification capacity, EC, expressed as mL of oil emulsified by 1 g samples, was calculated using(5)EC=HeightofemulsifiedlayerHeightofthewholesolutioninthecentrifugetube×100.


## 2.6. Cold and Hot Water-Insoluble Gel

A mixture of 1 g gum sample and 100 cm3 distilled water was thoroughly mixed for 1 hour. The mixture was then centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 15 minutes and the clear supernatant liquid discarded. The insoluble fraction was washed by adding distilled water and stirring for 3 minutes and recentrifuged at 1200 rpm for 15 minutes. This procedure was repeated four times, before transferring the insoluble fraction into a preweighed porcelain dish. The insoluble fraction was dried in an oven for 12 hours at 105°C, cooled in a desiccator, and weighed. The difference in weight gives the cold water-insoluble gel (CWIG).The hot water-insoluble gel (HWIG) determination was carried out by stirring 1 g of gum in 100 mL of distilled water for 30 minutes and heating the mixture in a water bath at 95°C for 1 hour; the mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 4 hours. Separation and determination of the HWIG were carried out as described for CWIG.


## 2.7. Intrinsic Viscosity

The specific viscosity of the 1% gum solutions (native and graft copolymerizedAS andAG) was measured with the Brookfield viscometer at 50, 60, and 100 rpm and calculated as follows: (6)ηsp=ηrel-1,ηred=ηspC,ηinh=ln⁡ηrelC.From the time of flow of polymer solutions (t) and that of the solvent (to, for distilled water), relative viscosity (ηrel=t/to) was obtained. The reduced viscosity (ηred) and the inherent viscosity (ηinh) were simultaneously plotted against concentration. “C” represents polymer concentration in g/dL. The intrinsic viscosity was obtained from the point of the intersection after extrapolation of two plots (i.e., ηred versus C and ηinh versus C) to zero concentration [22].


## 2.8. Solubility Capacity

A 1% gum solution (2.5 g of gum in 250 cm3 of water) was vigorously shaken in a thermostatically controlled water bath at 30°C for specified time interval (0, 30, 60, 90, 120, or 150 minutes). Then 20 cm3 is drawn out, allowed to cool, and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. Aliquots (10 cm3) of the supernatant were dried to constant weight at 105°C to determine the mass of the gum dissolved. The above experiment was repeated at 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80°C.


## 2.9. Flocculation Study

The flocculation test was done using the modified method of Rani et al. [22]. 100 mL of 0.25% Kaolin suspension was added to 10 ppm of the flocculant (native and acrylamide grafted gums). The suspension was stirred at 75 rpm for 3 minutes and 25 rpm for 7 minutes and then allowed to settle for 10 minutes. The absorbance of the supernatant liquids was measured with a UV-Visible spectrophotometer at 600 nm. Low absorbance value is indicative of good flocculation efficacy. The procedure was repeated for 30 and 50 ppm of the flocculants.


## 2.10. Metal Ion Sorption

Metal ion sorption was carried out by stirring 30 ppm (3 mg of gum in 100 mL of water) of the native and grafted gums and 100 mL solution containing 180 ppm of nickel ion (40 mg of Ni2SO4·6H2O in 100 mL of water) for 20 minutes, which was filtered, and its concentrations were determined with AAS. The metal ion concentration of the filtrate and its retention capacity were determined using (7) and (8), respectively [22].(7)Metalionuptake%=Initialconc.ofmetalion-finalconc.ofmetalionInitialconc.ofion×100%,(8)RetentionCapacityppm/mg=Initialconcofmetalion-finalconcofmetalionWeightofdrypolymer.where molar mass of Ni2SO4·6H2O and Ni is 262.85 g/mol and 58.7 g/mol, respectively, and conc. is the concentration.


## 2.11. Statistical Analysis

All determinations were carried out in triplicate and result was reported as the mean ± standard deviation. The swelling and solubility profile were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS (Version 16.0 software) to investigate the effect of pH and temperature on starch samples. TheShapiro-Wilk test of normality andLevene’s tests of homogenous variance were carried out to assess the assumptions of ANOVA in order to validate the results.


## 3. Result and Discussion

### 3.1. Chemical Composition

The physicochemical characteristics of theAlbizia gums were presented in Table 1. The grafting efficiency ofAS (110%) andAG (108%) was similar to that reported for gum ghatti using microwave assisted synthesis (Rani et al.,2012). The 10.89% and 9.9% moisture contents ofAS andAG gums, respectively, are within the specification limit of ≤20% for food and pharmaceutical applications [23]. Moisture content determines the storage conditions of materials and the pharmacopeia limit for moisture contents of natural gums is ≤15.0% [24]. The moisture content ofAS andAG gums was at par with that reported for xanthan gum and gum arabic but lower than that reported for otherAlbizia species [25, 26]. The 7.87% and 8.60% ash content ofASandAG, respectively, which is higher than that of most commercial gums (Table 2), is indicative of the high mineral content of the gums [25–27].Table 1
Physicochemical properties of native (ASN) and graft copolymerized (ASG)Albizia saman gums and native (AGN) and graft copolymerized (AGG) Albizia glaberrimagums.
Parameter
ASN
ASG
AGN
AGG
Moisture content (%)
10.89 ± 0.01
—
9.91 ± 0.02
—
Crude fibre (g/100 g)
8.59 ± 0.04
—
9.57 ± 0.02
—
Ether extract (g/100 g)
9.81 ± 0.01
—
8.01 ± 0.02
—
Ash content (g/100 g)
7.87 ± 0.02
—
8.60 ± 0.01
—
Bulk density (g/cm3)
0.710 ± 0.01
0.662 ± 0.07
0.738 ± 0.07
0.694 ± 0.04
Tapped density (g/cm3)
0.835 ± 0.04
0.740 ± 0.04
0.870 ± 0.04
0.782 ± 0.11
Carr’s index
17.535 ± 0.06
11.005 ± 0.07
17.555 ± 0.18
9.480 ± 0.11
Hausner’s ratio
1.176 ± 0.01
1.117 ± 0.01
1.179 ± 0.02
1.127 ± 0.13
aCWIG (%)
40.23 ± 2.47
39.75 ± 0.95
35.55 ± 1.34
40.55 ± 0.14
bHWIG (%)
8.00 ± 1.41
14.23 ± 1.11
10.96 ± 0.08
15.00 ± 0.07
cOBC (g)
4.89 ± 0.03
3.69 ± 0.13
3.44 ± 0.00
2.40 ± 0.06
dEC (%)
40.00 ± 0.00
30.09 ± 0.16
48.58 ± 0.81
19.88 ± 0.18
Intrinsic viscosity (cP)
0.78 ± 0.23
1.29 ± 0.94
1.11 ± 0.85
1.74 ± 1.33
Grafting (%)
550.00 ± 0.04
543.00 ± 0.08
—
—
Grafting yield (%)
54.00 ± 0.06
58.00 ± 0.02
—
—
Grafting efficiency (%)
110.00 ± 0.05
108.00 ± 0.07
—
—
aCWIG, cold water insoluble gel; bHWIG, hot water insoluble gel; cOBC, oil binding capacity; dEC, emulsion capacity.Table 2
The mineral composition of nativeAlbizia saman (ASN) and Albizia glaberrima(AGN) gums.
Minerals
ASN
AGN
Calcium (ppm)
64087
99394
Magnesium (ppm)
835.52
964.68
Sodium (ppm)
57842
50436
Lead (ppm)
43.82
42.52The CWIG ofAS andAG (40.23% and 35.55%) rapidly decreased in hot water to 8.00% and 10.96% (HWIG), respectively. The insoluble gel values observed forAS andAG were higher than that reported for otherAlbizia species [25, 26]. Gums are a complex mixture of polysaccharide with soluble and insoluble fractions; however, the quality of a gum is dependent on the soluble fraction [25].The emulsifying and oil binding capacity of theAG gum was higher than that ofAS (Table 1). Also, the emulsifying capacities of the modified gums were lower than their corresponding native gums. This can be associated with a decrease in percentage protein content due to the presence of acrylamide graft, which probably solubilizes the protein. Polysaccharide contains a small amount of strongly hydrophobic protein component bonded to the polysaccharides [28]. These hydrophobic protein components can adsorb at oil-water interfaces to form stabilizing layers around oil droplets [29]. Hence, the oil binding and emulsifying capacity could be associated with the amount of protein in the polysaccharide.The bulk density (0.710 and 0.738 g/cm3) ofAS andAG (Table 1) is comparable with the 0.721 g/cm3 reported for badam gum [30] but higher than the value of 0.564 g/cm3 for dioclea gum [31] and 0.500 g/cm3 and 0.600 g/cm3 for gum arabic and almond gum [27]. The bulk and tapped densities reduced after graft copolymerization of the gums. The bulk and tapped densities quantify the packing arrangement of the particles of a material and its compaction behavior. The powder flow property is important in the consideration of polysaccharide for industrial use [32]. The flowability of powders can be predicted by its compressibility index (expressed as Carr’s index). Compressibility index greater than 26 indicates poor flowability; also, low compressibility index is synonymous with excellent flowability [27, 33]. The 17.535 and 17.555 Carr’s index of theAlbizia gums which reduced after graft copolymerization is indicative of the gum’s excellent flowability.The intrinsic viscosities of the native gums increased from 0.78 and 1.29% forAS andAG gums to 1.11 and 1.74% after graft copolymerization of the gums, respectively (Table 1).AG has a higher intrinsic viscosity (higher molecular weight) thanAS. An important property of hydrocolloid is their viscosity which exists due to hydrogen bonding between and within segments of the molecules and also with water molecules. Gums have the ability to influence water many times their own volume significantly. The intrinsic viscosity (which is directly related to molecular weight) increased in the graft copolymerized gums.The FTIR spectra of the native and grafted copolymerized (modified)AS andAG were presented in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. The spectra of the native gums have broadband around OH band in the 3400–3200 cm−1 range indicating the OH functional group and a peak around 1028–1022 cm−1 indicating the C–O–C functional group. In addition to the above bands, the spectra of the modified gums both have bands for N–H stretch around 3342–3333 cm−1 and for C–N around 1097–1088 cm−1.Figure 2
FTIR spectrum of native (ASN) and graft copolymerized (ASG)Albizia saman gums.
(a)
ASN
(b)
ASGFigure 3
FTIR spectrum of native (AGN) and graft copolymerized (AGG)Albizia glaberrima gums.
(a)
AGN
(b)
AGGThe grafted copolymerized gums in addition to being lighter in colour had tougher texture compared with the native gums, which could be as a result of stronger covalent bonds (amide linkage). This is corroborated by the peaks around 1646 cm−1 (ASG) and 1664 cm−1 (AGG) in the spectra which is indicative of presence of amide (Figures 2 and 3).


### 3.2. Mineral Composition of theAlbiziaGums

The mineral composition of theAS andAG is presented in Table 2. TheAS and AG gums are richer in calcium and sodium when compared with most of the popular commercial gums such as gum arabic, guar gum, and xanthan gum [25, 26, 34]. Gums contain various metal ions as neutralized atoms; the nature and amount of these constituents depend on the composition of soil upon which the trees grew [35]. Gel formation in certain gums (such asKhaya grandifoliola) has been attributed to calcium ions [36].TheAS andAG gums have the essential cations needed by the body (calcium, sodium, and magnesium), and the metal composition trend is Ca > Na ≫ Mg trend which is at par with that reported for otherAlbizia gums (Anderson and Morisson, 1990). TheAlbizia gums could be a good gelling agent due to their high calcium content. Lead consumption is dangerous and has a profound effect upon accumulation in the body over a period of time.


### 3.3. Solubility of the Gums

The effect of temperature (40–80°C) on the solubility profile of the gums is presented in Table3. As temperature and heating duration increased, the solubility of the gum samples increased. The solubility of the gums at 40°C (within 0–150 minutes) was 6.225–7.575 g/L (ASN) and 5.900–8.375 g/L (AGN); this increased steadily as the temperature increased; at 80°C, it was 6.050–9.525 (ASN) and 5.875–8.775 g/L (AGN). The graft copolymerized gum’s solubility was lower than that of the native gums but also increased with increase in temperature.Table 3
The effect of temperature on the solubility of native (ASN) and graft copolymerized (ASG)Albizia samangums and native (AGN) and graft copolymerized (AGG) Albizia glaberrimagums over time.
Gum
Time (min)
Temperature
40°C
50°C
60°C
70°C
80°C
ASN
0
6.225 ± 0.040
6.175 ± 0.040
6.175 ± 0.04
6.100 ± 0.07
6.050 ± 0.07
ASG
0
5.775 ± 0.040
5.424 ± 0.040
5.775 ± 0.04
5.750 ± 0.07
5.630 ± 0.15
AGN
0
5.900 ± 0.070
5.850 ± 0.070
5.875 ± 0.04
5.875 ± 0.00
5.875 ± 0.04
AGG
0
4.525 ± 0.040
4.425 ± 0.040
4.525 ± 0.04
4.575 ± 0.11
4.225 ± 0.04
ASN
30
6.200 ± 0.000
6.300 ± 0.070
7.075 ± 0.04
7.300 ± 0.07
8.325 ± 0.11
ASG
30
6.075 ± 0.110
6.100 ± 0.070
6.125 ± 0.04
6.075 ± 0.04
7.075 ± 0.04
AGN
30
6.650 ± 0.070
7.050 ± 0.000
7.025 ± 0.04
7.600 ± 0.07
7.025 ± 0.04
AGG
30
5.075 ± 0.040
5.075 ± 0.040
5.500 ± 0.07
5.525 ± 0.04
5.825 ± 0.04
ASN
60
6.225 ± 0.040
6.625 ± 0.04
7.375 ± 0.04
8.125 ± 0.04
8.925 ± 0.11
ASG
60
6.575 ± 0.040
6.775 ± 0.04
7.100 ± 0.00
7.575 ± 0.04
8.275 ± 0.04
AGN
60
7.025 ± 0.040
7.475 ± 0.04
8.100 ± 0.07
8.025 ± 0.11
8.100 ± 0.07
AGG
60
6.050 ± 0.070
6.525 ± 0.11
6.625 ± 0.11
7.775 ± 0.04
8.100 ± 0.07
ASN
90
6.575 ± 0.110
7.475 ± 0.04
8.100 ± 0.07
8.950 ± 0.07
9.475 ± 0.04
ASG
90
6.900 ± 0.140
7.500 ± 0.00
7.800 ± 0.00
8.100 ± 0.07
8.550 ± 0.07
AGN
90
7.800 ± 0.000
7.950 ± 0.07
8.325 ± 0.18
8.200 ± 0.07
8.325 ± 0.18
AGG
90
7.825 ± 0.040
7.075 ± 0.04
7.500 ± 0.14
8.100 ± 0.07
8.275 ± 0.04
ASN
120
7.025 ± 0.040
7.975 ± 0.04
8.975 ± 0.04
9.175 ± 0.11
9.250 ± 0.35
ASG
120
7.775 ± 0.040
8.075 ± 0.04
8.300 ± 0.07
8.575 ± 0.04
9.200 ± 0.07
AGN
120
8.050 ± 0.070
8.300 ± 0.00
8.525 ± 0.04
8.550 ± 0.07
8.525 ± 0.04
AGG
120
7.475 ± 0.040
8.175 ± 0.04
8.075 ± 0.04
8.450 ± 0.04
8.425 ± 0.04
ASN
150
7.575 ± 0.040
8.025 ± 0.04
9.075 ± 0.04
9.300 ± 0.21
9.525 ± 0.04
ASG
150
8.525 ± 0.040
9.075 ± 0.04
9.525 ± 0.04
9.075 ± 0.04
9.350 ± 0.04
AGN
150
8.375 ± 0.040
8.450 ± 0.00
8.775 ± 0.32
8.770 ± 0.14
8.775 ± 0.32
AGG
150
7.975 ± 0.040
8.450 ± 0.07
8.575 ± 0.00
8.770 ± 0.14
8.670 ± 0.11The result of the two-way ANOVA test conducted to investigate the effect of temperature (40, 50, 60, 70, and 80°C) and time (0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes) on the gum’s solubility is presented in Table4. TheShapiro-Wilk test of normality andLevene’s tests of homogenous variance were carried out to validate the assumptions of ANOVA in order to authenticate the results. TheWilk Statistic for the gum samples is 0.921, 0.953, 0.894, and 0.872 for ASN, ASG, AGN, and AGG, respectively, and its significance was greater than 0.05.Levene’s test of gum samples was 2.659 with a significance value of 1.64. This result showed that there is a statistically significant interaction between temperature and timing, F(14,49)=19.013, p=0.129. This suggests that, at lower temperatures, longer time could enhance solubility. An observation of the main effects shows that the two factors, temperature and time, have statistically significant effect on solubility; temperature: F(3,49)=68.099, p≤0.001; time: F(5,49)=424.728, p≤0.001.Table 4
Analysis of variation (ANOVA) for the solubility of theAlbizia gum samples at different temperatures.
Source
Type III sum of squares
Df
Mean square
F
Sig.
Intercept
15252.898
1
15252.898
9.593
E
4
.000
Time
337.653
5
67.531
424.728
.000
Temp
32.483
3
10.828
68.099
.000
Time∗ temp
42.319
14
3.023
19.013
.000
Error
10.017
49
.159


### 3.4. Flocculation Efficiency of the Gums

The flocculation study in 0.25% kaolin suspension (“jar test” apparatus) for 10, 30, and 50 ppm dosage was presented in Table5. The flocculation efficiency of the native gums increased after modifications from 60.76% (ASN) to 96.03% (ASG) and 60.80% (AGN) to 96.38% (AGG) at 10 ppm, with significant increase as the dosage increased. The better flocculation efficacy exhibited by the graft copolymerizedAlbizia gums (ASG and AGG) compared with their native gums (ASN and AGN) may be due to their higher intrinsic viscosity as evidenced in Table 1 [22, 37].AG gum has better flocculant characteristic in the native and the modified gums compared withAS. Branching and molecular weight of polymer chains determine the effectiveness of flocculants [37]. The floc formation is higher in high-molecular-weight branched polysaccharide backbone with flexible grafted polyacrylamide chains.Table 5
Flocculation efficiency of native (ASN) and graft copolymerized (ASG)Albizia saman and native (AGN) and graft copolymerized (AGG) Albizia glaberrimagums at different concentrations in 0.25% kaolin suspension.
Gums
Clarity of kaolin solution (%)
10 (ppm)
30 (ppm)
50 (ppm)
ASN
60.76
68.66
74.30
ASG
96.03
98.16
98.29
AGN
60.80
70.07
74.73
AGG
96.38
98.30
98.46The ion removal capacity of the native and graft copolymerizedAS andAG gums was presented in Table 6. The native and modifiedAS andAG had high metal ion uptake (42.07–44.00%) and high retention capacity (38.76–39.47 ppm/mg). There was no significant difference in the metal ion uptake and retention capacity of the native and modifiedAlbizia gums. However, the native and modifiedAG gums have better ion removal and retention capacity than the native and modifiedAS gum, respectively.Table 6
Ion removal capacity of native (ASN) and graft copolymerizedAlbizia saman(ASG) and native (AGN) and graft copolymerized (AGG) Albizia glaberrimagums.
Gums
Initial conc. of Ni2+ (ppm)
Final conc. of Ni2+ (ppm)
Metal ion uptake (%)
Retention capacity (ppm/mg)
ASN
110.000
63.721
42.07
38.760
ASG
110.000
63.342
42.42
38.886
AGN
110.000
62.046
43.59
39.318
AGG
110.000
61.598
44.00
39.467


## 3.1. Chemical Composition

The physicochemical characteristics of theAlbizia gums were presented in Table 1. The grafting efficiency ofAS (110%) andAG (108%) was similar to that reported for gum ghatti using microwave assisted synthesis (Rani et al.,2012). The 10.89% and 9.9% moisture contents ofAS andAG gums, respectively, are within the specification limit of ≤20% for food and pharmaceutical applications [23]. Moisture content determines the storage conditions of materials and the pharmacopeia limit for moisture contents of natural gums is ≤15.0% [24]. The moisture content ofAS andAG gums was at par with that reported for xanthan gum and gum arabic but lower than that reported for otherAlbizia species [25, 26]. The 7.87% and 8.60% ash content ofASandAG, respectively, which is higher than that of most commercial gums (Table 2), is indicative of the high mineral content of the gums [25–27].Table 1
Physicochemical properties of native (ASN) and graft copolymerized (ASG)Albizia saman gums and native (AGN) and graft copolymerized (AGG) Albizia glaberrimagums.
Parameter
ASN
ASG
AGN
AGG
Moisture content (%)
10.89 ± 0.01
—
9.91 ± 0.02
—
Crude fibre (g/100 g)
8.59 ± 0.04
—
9.57 ± 0.02
—
Ether extract (g/100 g)
9.81 ± 0.01
—
8.01 ± 0.02
—
Ash content (g/100 g)
7.87 ± 0.02
—
8.60 ± 0.01
—
Bulk density (g/cm3)
0.710 ± 0.01
0.662 ± 0.07
0.738 ± 0.07
0.694 ± 0.04
Tapped density (g/cm3)
0.835 ± 0.04
0.740 ± 0.04
0.870 ± 0.04
0.782 ± 0.11
Carr’s index
17.535 ± 0.06
11.005 ± 0.07
17.555 ± 0.18
9.480 ± 0.11
Hausner’s ratio
1.176 ± 0.01
1.117 ± 0.01
1.179 ± 0.02
1.127 ± 0.13
aCWIG (%)
40.23 ± 2.47
39.75 ± 0.95
35.55 ± 1.34
40.55 ± 0.14
bHWIG (%)
8.00 ± 1.41
14.23 ± 1.11
10.96 ± 0.08
15.00 ± 0.07
cOBC (g)
4.89 ± 0.03
3.69 ± 0.13
3.44 ± 0.00
2.40 ± 0.06
dEC (%)
40.00 ± 0.00
30.09 ± 0.16
48.58 ± 0.81
19.88 ± 0.18
Intrinsic viscosity (cP)
0.78 ± 0.23
1.29 ± 0.94
1.11 ± 0.85
1.74 ± 1.33
Grafting (%)
550.00 ± 0.04
543.00 ± 0.08
—
—
Grafting yield (%)
54.00 ± 0.06
58.00 ± 0.02
—
—
Grafting efficiency (%)
110.00 ± 0.05
108.00 ± 0.07
—
—
aCWIG, cold water insoluble gel; bHWIG, hot water insoluble gel; cOBC, oil binding capacity; dEC, emulsion capacity.Table 2
The mineral composition of nativeAlbizia saman (ASN) and Albizia glaberrima(AGN) gums.
Minerals
ASN
AGN
Calcium (ppm)
64087
99394
Magnesium (ppm)
835.52
964.68
Sodium (ppm)
57842
50436
Lead (ppm)
43.82
42.52The CWIG ofAS andAG (40.23% and 35.55%) rapidly decreased in hot water to 8.00% and 10.96% (HWIG), respectively. The insoluble gel values observed forAS andAG were higher than that reported for otherAlbizia species [25, 26]. Gums are a complex mixture of polysaccharide with soluble and insoluble fractions; however, the quality of a gum is dependent on the soluble fraction [25].The emulsifying and oil binding capacity of theAG gum was higher than that ofAS (Table 1). Also, the emulsifying capacities of the modified gums were lower than their corresponding native gums. This can be associated with a decrease in percentage protein content due to the presence of acrylamide graft, which probably solubilizes the protein. Polysaccharide contains a small amount of strongly hydrophobic protein component bonded to the polysaccharides [28]. These hydrophobic protein components can adsorb at oil-water interfaces to form stabilizing layers around oil droplets [29]. Hence, the oil binding and emulsifying capacity could be associated with the amount of protein in the polysaccharide.The bulk density (0.710 and 0.738 g/cm3) ofAS andAG (Table 1) is comparable with the 0.721 g/cm3 reported for badam gum [30] but higher than the value of 0.564 g/cm3 for dioclea gum [31] and 0.500 g/cm3 and 0.600 g/cm3 for gum arabic and almond gum [27]. The bulk and tapped densities reduced after graft copolymerization of the gums. The bulk and tapped densities quantify the packing arrangement of the particles of a material and its compaction behavior. The powder flow property is important in the consideration of polysaccharide for industrial use [32]. The flowability of powders can be predicted by its compressibility index (expressed as Carr’s index). Compressibility index greater than 26 indicates poor flowability; also, low compressibility index is synonymous with excellent flowability [27, 33]. The 17.535 and 17.555 Carr’s index of theAlbizia gums which reduced after graft copolymerization is indicative of the gum’s excellent flowability.The intrinsic viscosities of the native gums increased from 0.78 and 1.29% forAS andAG gums to 1.11 and 1.74% after graft copolymerization of the gums, respectively (Table 1).AG has a higher intrinsic viscosity (higher molecular weight) thanAS. An important property of hydrocolloid is their viscosity which exists due to hydrogen bonding between and within segments of the molecules and also with water molecules. Gums have the ability to influence water many times their own volume significantly. The intrinsic viscosity (which is directly related to molecular weight) increased in the graft copolymerized gums.The FTIR spectra of the native and grafted copolymerized (modified)AS andAG were presented in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. The spectra of the native gums have broadband around OH band in the 3400–3200 cm−1 range indicating the OH functional group and a peak around 1028–1022 cm−1 indicating the C–O–C functional group. In addition to the above bands, the spectra of the modified gums both have bands for N–H stretch around 3342–3333 cm−1 and for C–N around 1097–1088 cm−1.Figure 2
FTIR spectrum of native (ASN) and graft copolymerized (ASG)Albizia saman gums.
(a)
ASN
(b)
ASGFigure 3
FTIR spectrum of native (AGN) and graft copolymerized (AGG)Albizia glaberrima gums.
(a)
AGN
(b)
AGGThe grafted copolymerized gums in addition to being lighter in colour had tougher texture compared with the native gums, which could be as a result of stronger covalent bonds (amide linkage). This is corroborated by the peaks around 1646 cm−1 (ASG) and 1664 cm−1 (AGG) in the spectra which is indicative of presence of amide (Figures 2 and 3).


## 3.2. Mineral Composition of theAlbiziaGums

The mineral composition of theAS andAG is presented in Table 2. TheAS and AG gums are richer in calcium and sodium when compared with most of the popular commercial gums such as gum arabic, guar gum, and xanthan gum [25, 26, 34]. Gums contain various metal ions as neutralized atoms; the nature and amount of these constituents depend on the composition of soil upon which the trees grew [35]. Gel formation in certain gums (such asKhaya grandifoliola) has been attributed to calcium ions [36].TheAS andAG gums have the essential cations needed by the body (calcium, sodium, and magnesium), and the metal composition trend is Ca > Na ≫ Mg trend which is at par with that reported for otherAlbizia gums (Anderson and Morisson, 1990). TheAlbizia gums could be a good gelling agent due to their high calcium content. Lead consumption is dangerous and has a profound effect upon accumulation in the body over a period of time.


## 3.3. Solubility of the Gums

The effect of temperature (40–80°C) on the solubility profile of the gums is presented in Table3. As temperature and heating duration increased, the solubility of the gum samples increased. The solubility of the gums at 40°C (within 0–150 minutes) was 6.225–7.575 g/L (ASN) and 5.900–8.375 g/L (AGN); this increased steadily as the temperature increased; at 80°C, it was 6.050–9.525 (ASN) and 5.875–8.775 g/L (AGN). The graft copolymerized gum’s solubility was lower than that of the native gums but also increased with increase in temperature.Table 3
The effect of temperature on the solubility of native (ASN) and graft copolymerized (ASG)Albizia samangums and native (AGN) and graft copolymerized (AGG) Albizia glaberrimagums over time.
Gum
Time (min)
Temperature
40°C
50°C
60°C
70°C
80°C
ASN
0
6.225 ± 0.040
6.175 ± 0.040
6.175 ± 0.04
6.100 ± 0.07
6.050 ± 0.07
ASG
0
5.775 ± 0.040
5.424 ± 0.040
5.775 ± 0.04
5.750 ± 0.07
5.630 ± 0.15
AGN
0
5.900 ± 0.070
5.850 ± 0.070
5.875 ± 0.04
5.875 ± 0.00
5.875 ± 0.04
AGG
0
4.525 ± 0.040
4.425 ± 0.040
4.525 ± 0.04
4.575 ± 0.11
4.225 ± 0.04
ASN
30
6.200 ± 0.000
6.300 ± 0.070
7.075 ± 0.04
7.300 ± 0.07
8.325 ± 0.11
ASG
30
6.075 ± 0.110
6.100 ± 0.070
6.125 ± 0.04
6.075 ± 0.04
7.075 ± 0.04
AGN
30
6.650 ± 0.070
7.050 ± 0.000
7.025 ± 0.04
7.600 ± 0.07
7.025 ± 0.04
AGG
30
5.075 ± 0.040
5.075 ± 0.040
5.500 ± 0.07
5.525 ± 0.04
5.825 ± 0.04
ASN
60
6.225 ± 0.040
6.625 ± 0.04
7.375 ± 0.04
8.125 ± 0.04
8.925 ± 0.11
ASG
60
6.575 ± 0.040
6.775 ± 0.04
7.100 ± 0.00
7.575 ± 0.04
8.275 ± 0.04
AGN
60
7.025 ± 0.040
7.475 ± 0.04
8.100 ± 0.07
8.025 ± 0.11
8.100 ± 0.07
AGG
60
6.050 ± 0.070
6.525 ± 0.11
6.625 ± 0.11
7.775 ± 0.04
8.100 ± 0.07
ASN
90
6.575 ± 0.110
7.475 ± 0.04
8.100 ± 0.07
8.950 ± 0.07
9.475 ± 0.04
ASG
90
6.900 ± 0.140
7.500 ± 0.00
7.800 ± 0.00
8.100 ± 0.07
8.550 ± 0.07
AGN
90
7.800 ± 0.000
7.950 ± 0.07
8.325 ± 0.18
8.200 ± 0.07
8.325 ± 0.18
AGG
90
7.825 ± 0.040
7.075 ± 0.04
7.500 ± 0.14
8.100 ± 0.07
8.275 ± 0.04
ASN
120
7.025 ± 0.040
7.975 ± 0.04
8.975 ± 0.04
9.175 ± 0.11
9.250 ± 0.35
ASG
120
7.775 ± 0.040
8.075 ± 0.04
8.300 ± 0.07
8.575 ± 0.04
9.200 ± 0.07
AGN
120
8.050 ± 0.070
8.300 ± 0.00
8.525 ± 0.04
8.550 ± 0.07
8.525 ± 0.04
AGG
120
7.475 ± 0.040
8.175 ± 0.04
8.075 ± 0.04
8.450 ± 0.04
8.425 ± 0.04
ASN
150
7.575 ± 0.040
8.025 ± 0.04
9.075 ± 0.04
9.300 ± 0.21
9.525 ± 0.04
ASG
150
8.525 ± 0.040
9.075 ± 0.04
9.525 ± 0.04
9.075 ± 0.04
9.350 ± 0.04
AGN
150
8.375 ± 0.040
8.450 ± 0.00
8.775 ± 0.32
8.770 ± 0.14
8.775 ± 0.32
AGG
150
7.975 ± 0.040
8.450 ± 0.07
8.575 ± 0.00
8.770 ± 0.14
8.670 ± 0.11The result of the two-way ANOVA test conducted to investigate the effect of temperature (40, 50, 60, 70, and 80°C) and time (0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes) on the gum’s solubility is presented in Table4. TheShapiro-Wilk test of normality andLevene’s tests of homogenous variance were carried out to validate the assumptions of ANOVA in order to authenticate the results. TheWilk Statistic for the gum samples is 0.921, 0.953, 0.894, and 0.872 for ASN, ASG, AGN, and AGG, respectively, and its significance was greater than 0.05.Levene’s test of gum samples was 2.659 with a significance value of 1.64. This result showed that there is a statistically significant interaction between temperature and timing, F(14,49)=19.013, p=0.129. This suggests that, at lower temperatures, longer time could enhance solubility. An observation of the main effects shows that the two factors, temperature and time, have statistically significant effect on solubility; temperature: F(3,49)=68.099, p≤0.001; time: F(5,49)=424.728, p≤0.001.Table 4
Analysis of variation (ANOVA) for the solubility of theAlbizia gum samples at different temperatures.
Source
Type III sum of squares
Df
Mean square
F
Sig.
Intercept
15252.898
1
15252.898
9.593
E
4
.000
Time
337.653
5
67.531
424.728
.000
Temp
32.483
3
10.828
68.099
.000
Time∗ temp
42.319
14
3.023
19.013
.000
Error
10.017
49
.159


## 3.4. Flocculation Efficiency of the Gums

The flocculation study in 0.25% kaolin suspension (“jar test” apparatus) for 10, 30, and 50 ppm dosage was presented in Table5. The flocculation efficiency of the native gums increased after modifications from 60.76% (ASN) to 96.03% (ASG) and 60.80% (AGN) to 96.38% (AGG) at 10 ppm, with significant increase as the dosage increased. The better flocculation efficacy exhibited by the graft copolymerizedAlbizia gums (ASG and AGG) compared with their native gums (ASN and AGN) may be due to their higher intrinsic viscosity as evidenced in Table 1 [22, 37].AG gum has better flocculant characteristic in the native and the modified gums compared withAS. Branching and molecular weight of polymer chains determine the effectiveness of flocculants [37]. The floc formation is higher in high-molecular-weight branched polysaccharide backbone with flexible grafted polyacrylamide chains.Table 5
Flocculation efficiency of native (ASN) and graft copolymerized (ASG)Albizia saman and native (AGN) and graft copolymerized (AGG) Albizia glaberrimagums at different concentrations in 0.25% kaolin suspension.
Gums
Clarity of kaolin solution (%)
10 (ppm)
30 (ppm)
50 (ppm)
ASN
60.76
68.66
74.30
ASG
96.03
98.16
98.29
AGN
60.80
70.07
74.73
AGG
96.38
98.30
98.46The ion removal capacity of the native and graft copolymerizedAS andAG gums was presented in Table 6. The native and modifiedAS andAG had high metal ion uptake (42.07–44.00%) and high retention capacity (38.76–39.47 ppm/mg). There was no significant difference in the metal ion uptake and retention capacity of the native and modifiedAlbizia gums. However, the native and modifiedAG gums have better ion removal and retention capacity than the native and modifiedAS gum, respectively.Table 6
Ion removal capacity of native (ASN) and graft copolymerizedAlbizia saman(ASG) and native (AGN) and graft copolymerized (AGG) Albizia glaberrimagums.
Gums
Initial conc. of Ni2+ (ppm)
Final conc. of Ni2+ (ppm)
Metal ion uptake (%)
Retention capacity (ppm/mg)
ASN
110.000
63.721
42.07
38.760
ASG
110.000
63.342
42.42
38.886
AGN
110.000
62.046
43.59
39.318
AGG
110.000
61.598
44.00
39.467


## 4. Conclusion

TheAS andAG gums were rich in minerals and contain a higher percentage of insoluble matter compared to most commercial gums. The gums can also be stored for a long time without losing their integrity and have excellent functional properties comparable with those of most commercial gums. The physicochemical properties of theAlbizia gums were within the acceptable limits and standards for food pharmaceutical and other industrial applications. A stable graft was formed between acrylamide and theAS andAG gums, withAG gums having higher grafting efficiency.AG gum also has higher flocculation efficiency and ion removal capacity thanAS. The modified (acrylamide grafted)Albizia gums are better flocculants than the native gums, with the acrylamide graftedAG gum having the best flocculation efficiency.



---

*Source: 3125385-2017-06-18.xml*