# Quantitative Proteomic (iTRAQ) Analysis of 1st Trimester Maternal Plasma Samples in Pregnancies at Risk for Preeclampsia

Authors: Varaprasad Kolla; Paul Jenö; Suzette Moes; Olav Lapaire; Irene Hoesli; Sinuhe Hahn
Journal: Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

A current major obstacle is that no reliable screening markers exist to detect pregnancies at risk for preeclampsia. Quantitative proteomic analysis employing isobaric labelling (iTRAQ) has been suggested to be suitable for the detection of potential plasma biomarkers, a feature we recently verified in analysis of pregnancies with Down syndrome foetuses. We have now examined whether this approach could yield biomarkers to screen pregnancies at risk for preeclampsia. In our study, we used maternal plasma samples obtained at 12 weeks of gestation, six from women who subsequently developed preeclampsia and six with uncomplicated deliveries. In our analysis, we observed elevations in 10 proteins out of 64 proteins in the preeclampsia study group when compared to the healthy control group. These proteins included clusterin, fibrinogen, fibronectin, and angiotensinogen, increased levels of which are known to be associated with preeclampsia. An elevation in the immune-modulatory molecule, galectin 3 binding protein, was also noted. Our pilot study, therefore, indicates that quantitative proteomic iTRAQ analysis could be a useful tool for the detection of new preeclampsia screening markers.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Preeclampsia is a major health concern, as it is a leading cause of fetal and maternal mortality and morbidity, worldwide [1]. A major clinical deficit is that no reliable screening markers exist to detect at-risk pregnancies, thereby offering no opportunity for intervening therapies prior to the onset of symptoms [2, 3]. This is especially relevant for severe cases of early onset forms of the disorder, resulting in the delivery of premature babies, who are frequently affected by intrauterine growth retardation.It is widely accepted that the underlying aetiology of this enigmatic disorder, characterised by sudden hypertension in previously normotensive pregnant women, involves the placenta. In this context, the placentae of early onset preeclampsia are usually characterised by abnormalities in trophoblast differentiation, lack of modification of the maternal spiral arteries, and ill-defined villous structure [4].Recent studies have indicated that the clinical symptoms, such as hypertension and proteinuria, are largely brought about by alterations in the levels of angiogenic factors produced by the placenta such as placental growth factor (PIGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), soluble Flt-1, and endoglin [5, 6] Although alterations in the levels of these cytokines do precede the onset of clinical symptoms, it is not clear how effective they will be as screening markers, as these changes occur relatively late in gestation.A considerable effort in prenatal medicine is being devoted to the development of efficacious first trimester screening tools, to detect pregnancies at risk for fetal aneuploidies, but also pregnancy-related disorders such as preeclampsia, as this would permit sufficient time for intervention. In this regard, quantitative changes at 11–14 weeks of pregnancy in proteins such as ADAM-12 [7], PP-13 (placental protein13) [8, 9], and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) in combination with Doppler ultrasound, have been shown to posses some predictive value in detecting cases at risk for preeclampsia [10].Since the aetiological cascade leading to the development of manifest preeclampsia is multifactorial, it is very unlikely that a single molecule (or small group of analytes) will possess sufficient sensitivity and specificity. Hence, new strategies will need to be explored in order to increase the pool of biomarker candidates.One such route is by proteomic analysis of the maternal plasma proteome. The underling rationale for such investigations is that as the placenta is in direct contact with the maternal circulation, proteins released by it should be detectable in maternal plasma. Since preeclampsia is associated with structural placental anomalies, the underlying alterations in protein expression should be reflected in plasma proteome. Consequently, this serves as a promising route for the detection of biomarkers indicative of abnormal placentation [11].Consequently, a recent study carried out under this premise [12] has shown that alterations in protein expression are evident maternal serum or plasma of affected pregnancies. Unfortunately the validity of these studies is limited, as they were performed on samples obtained from cases with manifest symptoms and, furthermore, did not employ state-of-the-art quantitative approaches permitting precise assessment of the extent of up- or downregulation of the newly discovered markers.A further limitation in these studies is the extremely complex nature of the plasma/serum proteome, whereby low-abundance proteins are masked by the preponderance of a small number of highly abundant plasma proteins. In addition, the high dynamic range of the plasma proteome precludes the use of conventional proteomic strategies employing gel electrophoresis, even when making use of fluorescent labeling, for example, DIGE (difference gel electrophoresis). Hence, the identification of new biomarkers in plasma/serum by conventional proteomic approaches is not very feasible.A method that has been proposed to largely overcome these deficits is isobaric labelling (iTRAQ: isobaric tags for absolute and relative quantitation) coupled with MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis. In this approach, the plasma peptides, following trypsin digestion, are chemically labelled with a discrete set of isotopes via an amine-tagging reagent [13]. These isotope tags permit ready discrimination by mass spectrometry, thereby permitting comparative quantification to a reference sample in a multiplex manner. To date, most applications have made use of commercial 4-plex or 8-plex reagents. By the use of these different isobaric tags, it is possible to examine different samples in a single mass spectrometric analysis.Since this method has been shown to permit highly reproducible comparative assessment of tagged peptides [14], it has been suggested to be suitable for the discovery of biomarkers in complex body fluid such as plasma [15]. In a recent study we have shown that the iTRAQ isobaric labelling approach may indeed be valid for the detection of biomarkers for pregnancy related conditions, such as fetuses with Down syndrome, in that we were able to discern quantitative alterations in known screening markers such as βhCG [16].Confident by the validity of the iTRAQ methodology, we have now in a pilot experiment investigated whether this approach could be suitable for the detection of biomarkers useful for determining pregnancies at risk for preeclampsia. In this study we examined 12 maternal plasma samples obtained at 12 weeks of pregnancy, of which 6 cases subsequently developed preeclampsia, while 6 cases had uncomplicated deliveries.Maternal plasma peptides were examined by 4-plex iTRAQ labelling in conjunction with a 4800 MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis. Our results indicate that quantitative differences can be being already detected in the first trimester of pregnancy between pregnancies which subsequently developed preeclampsia and those which had normal healthy outcome.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Samples

Blood samples for this case-control proteome study were collected prospectively from pregnant women at approximately 12 weeks of gestation. In a retrospective manner, 6 samples from cases that subsequently developed preeclampsia were matched with 6 samples from pregnancies with normal healthy outcome (Table1). This study was undertaken with the approval of the Institutional Ethical Board of the University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland and written informed consent was required in all instances.Table 1
Characteristic of study population.
(a)
Criteria used for pregnancy with or without preeclampsia for the longitudinal study
ControlPEMaternal age (years)35.1±1.335.1±6.8Gestational age (weeks)38.8±0.834.9±2.4Systolic BP (mmHg)122.5±14.2188.8±18.6Diastolic BP (mmHg)73.6±7.0111.8±14.1Proteinuria (dipstick)Negativepositive(b)
Gestational window selected for the current study (n=6) who subsequently developed the preeclampsia
ControlPEGestational age (years)12.4±1.212.3±1.1


### 2.2. Sample Preparation

As described previously, 9 mL blood was drawn into BD P100 tubes (BD Diagnostics, Franklin Lake, NY, USA), which are specially designed for proteomics experiments, in that the EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) and protease inhibitor present in the tube prevent coagulation and stabilize the plasma proteome. Following phlebotomy the samples were centrifuged at 3,000×g for 30 minutes at 10°C, whereby the plasma was separated from the cellular fraction by aid of a mechanical separator, 100 μL aliquots were stored at −80°C until further use. For an overview of the workflow used in this analysis refer to Figure 1.Figure 1
Workflow for quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ reagent. Equal amounts of plasma protein (100μg) from control and PE (n=6) were pooled separately and duplicated (technical replicates), controls were labeled with 114 and 116 iTRAQ label, and PE were labeled with 115 and 117 iTRAQ label. The labeled samples were pooled and were subjected to a strong cation exchange chromatography to remove the excess label. Afterwards, LC-MALDI MS/MS was performed for protein identification and quantification.


### 2.3. Immuno-Depletion of High-Abundance Plasma Proteins

Highly abundant plasma proteins were depleted using ProteoMiner protein enrichment kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. 1 mL of plasma was used for the depletion and after the whole procedure, 300μL was eluted in elution reagent. After depletion protein concentration was measured using RC DC Protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).


### 2.4. Tryptic Digestion and iTRAQ Reagent Labelling

Equal amounts (100μg) of depleted plasma protein from six of the PE cases and controls were pooled separately and splitted into two technical replicate for the iTRAQ labelling. These samples were denatured with 2% SPE in 500 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 minutes at room temperature, following which they were reduced with 2 μL of 50 mM tris-(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP) (Sigma-Aldrich) at 60°C for 1 h and were then alkylated with 10 mM s-methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS) for 10 minutes in room temperature. After alkylation, the proteins were digested overnight at 37°C with 1 U/μL trypsin (TPCK treated) (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA 94404, USA). Peptides were labelled with one unit of iTRAQ Reagent Multiplex kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA 94404, USA) that was reconstituted in 70 μL of ethanol. iTRAQ labels 114 and 116 were used separately for labelling the pooled duplicated control sample (technical replicates), and 115 and 117 were used separately to label the pooled duplicate preeclampsia samples (technical replicates). The iTRAQ labelling reagent solution was added to the digest and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. To assess the accuracy of the ratiometric quantitation of iTRAQ reagent a split in signal was performed, and the data was corrected as described in detail by Unwin and colleagues [17].


### 2.5. Strong Cation Exchange Chromatography (SCX)

Strong cation exchange chromatography was preformed to remove the excess iTRAQ reagent and interfering substances for the mass analysis. Dried peptides were resuspended in 200 mL of Buffer A and were loaded on polysulfoethyl A column (200 mm length × 4.6 id, 5μm particle size, and 200 Å´ pore size) on a BioLC HPLC unit (Dionex). Buffer A consisted of 10 mM KHPO4, 25% acetonitrile, and 500 mM KCl, pH 3.0, and Buffer B consisted of 10 mM KH2PO4, 25% acetonitrile, and 500 mM KCl, pH 3.0. The 60 min gradient comprised 100% Buffer A for 5 min, 5–30% Buffer B for 40 min, 30–100% Buffer B for 5 min, 100% Buffer B for 5 min, and finally 100% Buffer A for 5 min. Thirteen fractions were collected using a Foxy Jr. Fraction Collector (Dionex). Subsequently, 2 and 3 fractions were pooled according to the chromatogram profile based on the peak intensity, and all the products were dried in a vacuum concentrator, after which they were stored at −20°C prior to mass spectrometric analysis.


### 2.6. Nano-LC-MALDI

Should we changeThe dried SCX iTRAQ-labeled peptides were dissolved in Buffer A which consists of 95% H2O, 5% acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA and were loaded on C18 trap column (1 mm × 300 μm i.d. column) at 30 μl/minand separated on an analytical column (150 mm × 100 μm i.d. column) at 500 nL/min using the LC Packings Ultimate system. The peptides were separated using a linearly increasing concentration of acetonitrile in Buffer B from 5% to 30% in 120 min, and from 30% to 60% in 40 min. The elute was mixed with matrix (2 mg/mL alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 80% acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA) at a flow rate of 800 nl/min and deposited on an Opti-TOF LC/MALDI (Applied Biosystems) plate in 10s fractions, using an automatic robot, (Probot, Dionex).


### 2.7. MS and MS/MS

The mass spectrometer 4800 Plus MALDI TOF/TOF Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) was set to perform data acquisition in positive ion mode. An MS condition of 1000 shots per spectrum was used. Monoisotopic precursor selection for MS/MS was done by automatic precursor selection using an interpretation method using the 12 most intense peaks per spot with an MS/MS mode condition of 4000 laser shots per spectrum. Minimum peak width was one fraction, and mass tolerance was 80 ppm. Adduct tolerance (m/z) ±0.003. MSMS was done with a gas pressure of2×10-2 bar in the collision cell. Air was used as collision gas.


#### 2.7.1. Protein Identification and Database Searches

Protein identification and quantification were done by using the ProteinPilot software v2.0 (Applied Biosystems; MPE-Sciex). The search was performed against the human database of UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (version 3.52, November 2008) from the EBI website (http://www.ebi.ac.uk./IPI/IPIhelp.html), and concatenated target-decoy database-search strategy was used to check the false positive rate [18].


### 2.8. Relative Quantitation Criteria

The Paragon algorithm [19, 20] in ProteinPilot v2.0 software was used as the default search program with digestion enzyme set as trypsin and methyl methanethiosulfonate as cysteine modification. The search also included the possibility of more than eighty biological modifications and amino acid substitution of up to two substitutions per peptide using the BLOSUM62 matrix. Data was normalized for loading error by bias correction calculated with ProGroup algorithm, and identified proteins with at least 95% confidence and with a ProtScore of 1.3 were reported. The results obtained from ProteinPilot v2.0 software were exported to Microsoft Excel for further analysis. The study was performed in double duplex manner, where PE samples were labelled with 115 and 117; control was labelled with 114 and 116. Peptides were selected based on the criteria defined in the Protein Pilot software, which means that all the peptides were included for quantitation with an exception for those without an iTRAQ modification or reporter ion; an area count less than 40 and peptides with P value less than 0.001 were excluded [21]. As described by Gan and colleague in their study on estimation of relative quantitative ratio from iTRAQ experiments, we also used only peptides above or equal to 70% confidence level for the estimation of relative quantitation [22].


### 2.9. PANTHER Analysis

The PANTHER database was used to elucidate the molecular function, biological process, and signalling pathway associated with each individual protein (http://panther.appliedbiosystems.com/). (See Supplementary Material available online at doi:10.1155/2011/305964.)


## 2.1. Samples

Blood samples for this case-control proteome study were collected prospectively from pregnant women at approximately 12 weeks of gestation. In a retrospective manner, 6 samples from cases that subsequently developed preeclampsia were matched with 6 samples from pregnancies with normal healthy outcome (Table1). This study was undertaken with the approval of the Institutional Ethical Board of the University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland and written informed consent was required in all instances.Table 1
Characteristic of study population.
(a)
Criteria used for pregnancy with or without preeclampsia for the longitudinal study
ControlPEMaternal age (years)35.1±1.335.1±6.8Gestational age (weeks)38.8±0.834.9±2.4Systolic BP (mmHg)122.5±14.2188.8±18.6Diastolic BP (mmHg)73.6±7.0111.8±14.1Proteinuria (dipstick)Negativepositive(b)
Gestational window selected for the current study (n=6) who subsequently developed the preeclampsia
ControlPEGestational age (years)12.4±1.212.3±1.1


## 2.2. Sample Preparation

As described previously, 9 mL blood was drawn into BD P100 tubes (BD Diagnostics, Franklin Lake, NY, USA), which are specially designed for proteomics experiments, in that the EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) and protease inhibitor present in the tube prevent coagulation and stabilize the plasma proteome. Following phlebotomy the samples were centrifuged at 3,000×g for 30 minutes at 10°C, whereby the plasma was separated from the cellular fraction by aid of a mechanical separator, 100 μL aliquots were stored at −80°C until further use. For an overview of the workflow used in this analysis refer to Figure 1.Figure 1
Workflow for quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ reagent. Equal amounts of plasma protein (100μg) from control and PE (n=6) were pooled separately and duplicated (technical replicates), controls were labeled with 114 and 116 iTRAQ label, and PE were labeled with 115 and 117 iTRAQ label. The labeled samples were pooled and were subjected to a strong cation exchange chromatography to remove the excess label. Afterwards, LC-MALDI MS/MS was performed for protein identification and quantification.


## 2.3. Immuno-Depletion of High-Abundance Plasma Proteins

Highly abundant plasma proteins were depleted using ProteoMiner protein enrichment kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. 1 mL of plasma was used for the depletion and after the whole procedure, 300μL was eluted in elution reagent. After depletion protein concentration was measured using RC DC Protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).


## 2.4. Tryptic Digestion and iTRAQ Reagent Labelling

Equal amounts (100μg) of depleted plasma protein from six of the PE cases and controls were pooled separately and splitted into two technical replicate for the iTRAQ labelling. These samples were denatured with 2% SPE in 500 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 minutes at room temperature, following which they were reduced with 2 μL of 50 mM tris-(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP) (Sigma-Aldrich) at 60°C for 1 h and were then alkylated with 10 mM s-methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS) for 10 minutes in room temperature. After alkylation, the proteins were digested overnight at 37°C with 1 U/μL trypsin (TPCK treated) (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA 94404, USA). Peptides were labelled with one unit of iTRAQ Reagent Multiplex kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA 94404, USA) that was reconstituted in 70 μL of ethanol. iTRAQ labels 114 and 116 were used separately for labelling the pooled duplicated control sample (technical replicates), and 115 and 117 were used separately to label the pooled duplicate preeclampsia samples (technical replicates). The iTRAQ labelling reagent solution was added to the digest and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. To assess the accuracy of the ratiometric quantitation of iTRAQ reagent a split in signal was performed, and the data was corrected as described in detail by Unwin and colleagues [17].


## 2.5. Strong Cation Exchange Chromatography (SCX)

Strong cation exchange chromatography was preformed to remove the excess iTRAQ reagent and interfering substances for the mass analysis. Dried peptides were resuspended in 200 mL of Buffer A and were loaded on polysulfoethyl A column (200 mm length × 4.6 id, 5μm particle size, and 200 Å´ pore size) on a BioLC HPLC unit (Dionex). Buffer A consisted of 10 mM KHPO4, 25% acetonitrile, and 500 mM KCl, pH 3.0, and Buffer B consisted of 10 mM KH2PO4, 25% acetonitrile, and 500 mM KCl, pH 3.0. The 60 min gradient comprised 100% Buffer A for 5 min, 5–30% Buffer B for 40 min, 30–100% Buffer B for 5 min, 100% Buffer B for 5 min, and finally 100% Buffer A for 5 min. Thirteen fractions were collected using a Foxy Jr. Fraction Collector (Dionex). Subsequently, 2 and 3 fractions were pooled according to the chromatogram profile based on the peak intensity, and all the products were dried in a vacuum concentrator, after which they were stored at −20°C prior to mass spectrometric analysis.


## 2.6. Nano-LC-MALDI

Should we changeThe dried SCX iTRAQ-labeled peptides were dissolved in Buffer A which consists of 95% H2O, 5% acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA and were loaded on C18 trap column (1 mm × 300 μm i.d. column) at 30 μl/minand separated on an analytical column (150 mm × 100 μm i.d. column) at 500 nL/min using the LC Packings Ultimate system. The peptides were separated using a linearly increasing concentration of acetonitrile in Buffer B from 5% to 30% in 120 min, and from 30% to 60% in 40 min. The elute was mixed with matrix (2 mg/mL alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 80% acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA) at a flow rate of 800 nl/min and deposited on an Opti-TOF LC/MALDI (Applied Biosystems) plate in 10s fractions, using an automatic robot, (Probot, Dionex).


## 2.7. MS and MS/MS

The mass spectrometer 4800 Plus MALDI TOF/TOF Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) was set to perform data acquisition in positive ion mode. An MS condition of 1000 shots per spectrum was used. Monoisotopic precursor selection for MS/MS was done by automatic precursor selection using an interpretation method using the 12 most intense peaks per spot with an MS/MS mode condition of 4000 laser shots per spectrum. Minimum peak width was one fraction, and mass tolerance was 80 ppm. Adduct tolerance (m/z) ±0.003. MSMS was done with a gas pressure of2×10-2 bar in the collision cell. Air was used as collision gas.


### 2.7.1. Protein Identification and Database Searches

Protein identification and quantification were done by using the ProteinPilot software v2.0 (Applied Biosystems; MPE-Sciex). The search was performed against the human database of UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (version 3.52, November 2008) from the EBI website (http://www.ebi.ac.uk./IPI/IPIhelp.html), and concatenated target-decoy database-search strategy was used to check the false positive rate [18].


## 2.7.1. Protein Identification and Database Searches

Protein identification and quantification were done by using the ProteinPilot software v2.0 (Applied Biosystems; MPE-Sciex). The search was performed against the human database of UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot (version 3.52, November 2008) from the EBI website (http://www.ebi.ac.uk./IPI/IPIhelp.html), and concatenated target-decoy database-search strategy was used to check the false positive rate [18].


## 2.8. Relative Quantitation Criteria

The Paragon algorithm [19, 20] in ProteinPilot v2.0 software was used as the default search program with digestion enzyme set as trypsin and methyl methanethiosulfonate as cysteine modification. The search also included the possibility of more than eighty biological modifications and amino acid substitution of up to two substitutions per peptide using the BLOSUM62 matrix. Data was normalized for loading error by bias correction calculated with ProGroup algorithm, and identified proteins with at least 95% confidence and with a ProtScore of 1.3 were reported. The results obtained from ProteinPilot v2.0 software were exported to Microsoft Excel for further analysis. The study was performed in double duplex manner, where PE samples were labelled with 115 and 117; control was labelled with 114 and 116. Peptides were selected based on the criteria defined in the Protein Pilot software, which means that all the peptides were included for quantitation with an exception for those without an iTRAQ modification or reporter ion; an area count less than 40 and peptides with P value less than 0.001 were excluded [21]. As described by Gan and colleague in their study on estimation of relative quantitative ratio from iTRAQ experiments, we also used only peptides above or equal to 70% confidence level for the estimation of relative quantitation [22].


## 2.9. PANTHER Analysis

The PANTHER database was used to elucidate the molecular function, biological process, and signalling pathway associated with each individual protein (http://panther.appliedbiosystems.com/). (See Supplementary Material available online at doi:10.1155/2011/305964.)


## 3. Results

Samples were obtained from 6 cases which subsequently developed preeclampsia and 6 cases which delivered normal healthy babies. Care was taken to match both maternal and gestational age, to rule out any confounding influence of these two parameters.Low-abundant-plasma proteins were enriched by using ProteoMiner protein enrichment kit. This was accomplished through the use of a large highly diverse bead-based library of combinatorial peptide ligands. When plasma was applied to the beads, a small fraction of the high-abundance proteins saturated their high-affinity ligands, and the excess high-abundance proteins were washed away. In addition a very small amount of high-abundance proteins and low-abundance proteins were concentrated on their specific affinity ligands. This provides for a significant enrichment of medium- and low-abundant plasma proteins.The samples were pooled separately and duplicated in order to have more precise analytical replicate measurements. The iTRAQ analysis was done in double duplex style, the PE samples were labelled with iTRAQ 115 and 117 and the control samples with iTRAQ 114 and 116, using the workflow illustrated in Figure1.Following tandem MSMS, and by focussing on iTRAQ reporter ions in low molecular mass range (114–117 Da) for quantification, we identified 64 proteins with ≥95% confidence. However, after manually rechecking the MS/MS data thoroughly peak by peak, only 57 out of 64 proteins (92%) had a relative quantitation derived from the analysis of two or more peptides, while for 5 proteins, the quantitation was based on single peptide. For 2 proteins no quantitation could be ascertained by analysis using ProteinPilot. Figure2 shows the MSMS spectrum of the precursor ([M+H]+, m/z 1259.67 Da). In low-mass region the reporter ions are seen, while the area under the curve was used for quantification. A concatenated target-decoy database search strategy was used to check the false positive rate in our case, it was found to be 0%, which boosted the reliability of our data.Figure 2
Components of the spectrum illustrated are (i) MS and MS spectrum of the precursor ([M+H]+, m/z 1259.67 Da) (ii) low-mass region showing the reporter ions used for quantitation. The peptide is labeled by isobaric tags at both the N-terminus and C-terminal lysine side chain. The precursor ion and all the fragment ions therefore contain all four members of the tag set, but remain isobaric. The MS and MS spectrum was obtained from the singly charged [M+H]+ peptide using a 4800 MALDI TOF-TOF Analyzer.As we did the experiment in double duplex manner PE (115 and 117) and control (114 and 116), it was possible to estimate the cutoff point for the differentially expressed protein in our sample. Based on 64 relatively abundant protein ratios from PE and control an average variation of 4.4% was (±0.04) measured. If the cutoff was set at 10% average variance then only 74% of the proteins would fall within this variation range, but when it was increased to 20% then about 98% of the proteins fall in this variation range.So the cutoff point in this experiment was set at 20% (±0.2). That means that any relative change in protein ratio below or above ±1.2-fold was considered as differentially under or overexpressed Figure3.Figure 3
Frequency distribution (bars) from both PE and control replicates across different ranges of variation. The cumulative percentage (lines) is defined as the cumulative number of proteins falling within the defined variation range against the total number of proteins.The functional distribution of these proteins is illustrated in Figure4. For this interpretation, an analysis of 64 proteins was performed using the PANTHER classification system, which sorts the proteins into respective classes based on their biological process.Figure 4
Number of plasma protein identified using iTRAQ reagent. In total, 64 proteins were identified. Shown above is the classification of these proteins in different categories based on molecular function.It is of interest that three of the major groups involve cell adhesion molecules (13%), extracellular matrix proteins (13%), and member of the protease family (13%),and factors that are known to be aberrant in placental insufficiency apparent in preeclampsia. Furthermore, large groups were found to involve signalling molecules (13%) and carrier proteins (20%).A list of 10 of the upregulated proteins with fold change more than 1.2 is provided in Table2. A PANTHER subanalysis for pathway association of these 10 proteins indicates that 33% are associated with blood coagulation, 33% with plasminogen activation, 17% with angiotensin II, and 17% with integrin function shown in Figure 5.Table 2
List of protein up regulated in iTRAQ experiment with relative protein ratio (P value 0.001).
NAcc. no.Protein namesBiological processesMolecular function1P02679Fibrinogen Fragment DSignal transductionCalcium ion binding2P10909Clusterin isoform 2Compliment activationMisfolded protein binding3P02647Apolipoprotein A-ISignal transductionReceptor binding4P02751FibronectinAngiogenesisCollagen binding5P01019AngiotensinogenBlood vessel remodelingReceptor binding6P09382Galectin 3 bindingApoptosisGalactoside binding7P00750PlasminogenProteolysisProtein binding8P02787TransferrinIron ion transporterFerric ion binding9P04003C4 beta bindingCompliment activationProtein binding10P02790HemopexinHeme transporterIron ion bindingFigure 5
PANTHER analysis for pathway. In total, 10 proteins were identified as elevated. Shown above is the different signaling pathways hits by these protein.


## 4. Discussion

The comparative quantitative assessment of serum or plasma proteins via iTRAQ isobaric labelling combined with MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis has suggested to be suitable for the detection of biomarkers. This is largely due to the highly reproducible nature of the system, which exhibits little run-to-run variation, determined after a lengthy comparison of pooled and individual samples of case and control, yielding a coefficient of variation of 11.7% [15].In a previous proof-of-principle study, we examined whether this approach was suitable for the detection of screening markers that could be used to screen for pregnancies with a Down syndrome fetus [16]. This analysis indicated that this approach may indeed be valid, as we found a known screening marker, namely, βhCG (β human chorionic gonadotropin), amongst the pool of elevated proteins we detected.In our current study, we have now assessed whether this method could be suitable for the detection of biomarkers useful for PE screening. In our analysis we identified over 10 proteins whose concentration was altered in the plasma of pregnancies that subsequently developed PE when compared to those with normal deliveries. Amongst this group, we observed previously described glycoproteins [12] reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of PE such as fibrinogen, galectin, transferrin, hemopexin, and clusterine. Fibrinogen is present in the extracellular matrix of the placenta and plays an important role in cellular and matrix interaction. It can also play a role in inflammatory response, as an increase in level of fibrinogen can lead to adhesion of leukocytes and platelets to the endothelium [23]. Pathway analysis has shown that 33% of proteins are associated with blood coagulation pathway [24]. This suggests a larger-than-expected role that fibrinogen is playing in the pathogenesis of PE and needs to be further investigated in detail.Extracellular matrix protein fibronectin was also found to be overexpressed. Fibronectin is an important glycoprotein with a major role in early embryogenesis, trophoblast invasion, and vascular remodelling [25, 26]. Fibronectin has been suggested to be a potential predictive marker for PE. It is also of interest that 13% of proteins we detected are associated with integrin pathway signalling, of which fibronectin is an important component.We also found elevation in the level of apolipoprotein A1 which is involved in lipid metabolism. We also found altered level ins protease inhibitor (serpin) family member angiotensinogen and proteolytic factor like plasmin. Complement factor C4 beta, which plays important role in compliment activation was also observed to be elevated in our study.In a recent study Blumenstein and colleagues [12] have also observed an elevation in clusterin prior to onset of preeclampsia, thereby suggesting that it may also serve as a predictive marker. In our study we were, however, able to detect this elevation at a much earlier time-point in gestation in those cases that subsequently developed PE.It is of interest that the blood pressure regulating molecule angiotensinogen was also amongst the group of proteins we observed to be increased. This important molecule has previously reported to be elevated in manifest PE. The presence of this important screening marker in our pool of elevated plasma proteins suggests that the strategy we have chosen for the identification of new biomarkers is functional and worthy of further pursuit [27].That our assay is indeed capable of detecting proteins of placental origin is illustrated by presence of galectin, a placentally derived glycoprotein. This molecule is important in pregnancy by playing a potential role in preventing the attack from maternal immune system on the developing fetus, which can be seen as foreign semiallograft [28].That the conditions leading to PE are multifactorial is suggested by our observation that it may also involve factors such as apolipoprotein A-I, whose altered production might impair cholesterol transport, thereby contributing to arterial damage in those cases which develop PE [29].The underlying role of inflammatory processes are is also underscored by our observed elevation in complement C4 beta. Although this elevation may be largely contributed by the mother, it may be a reflection upon a maternal response to the increased release of placental debris which has been suggested to occur in pregnancies with PE.Our study supports the current view that the iTRAQ approach is very useful for the detection of biomarkers, largely due to its reproducibility and robustness. However, in order to assess the clinical utility of these new biomarkers, we will need to further investigate them using modern technologies such as selected reaction monitoring (SRM), which has emerged as the method of choice for biomarkers validation using mass spectroscopy [30, 31].As very few specific biomarkers currently exist to assist with the screening of pregnancy-related disorders such preeclampsia or preterm labour, it is possible that the approach we have described in this study will be useful for the discovery of such important clinical tools.



---

*Source: 305964-2012-04-10.xml*