# Micromorphological Characterization of the Leaf and Rhizome ofAgapanthus praecox subsp.praecox Willd. (Amaryllidaceae)

Authors: Olubunmi Josephine Sharaibi; Anthony Jide Afolayan
Journal: Journal of Botany
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Agapanthus praecoxsubsp.praecox Willd. is a highly valued medicinal plant of family Amaryllidaceae. The genusAgapanthus has been difficult to classify into distinct species due to broad similar morphology of its members. Present taxonomic confusion in this genus and numerous medicinal uses ofA. praecox necessitate its proper identification. The leaf and rhizome microcharacters were studied using scanning electron, light microscopy, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Epidermal cells are polygonal having wavy anticlinal walls with mean adaxial length of 80.04±0.5 μm and mean abaxial length of 85.33±0.6 μm. The leaf is amphistomatic with anomocytic stomata with mean pore length of 22.14±0.2 μm on the adaxial and 15.02±0.3 μm on the abaxial surface. The mean stomata densities on the adaxial and abaxial surfaces were 280.5±0.5 mm2 and 350.6±0.6 mm2. Trichomes and secretory ducts are absent on both surfaces. EDX spectroscopy showed that beryllium, carbon, oxygen, sodium, and silicon were present on both epidermal surfaces and rhizome while nitrogen, aluminum, and chlorine were detected only on the adaxial surface and sulphur was detected only in the rhizome.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The genusAgapanthus established by L’Heritier in 1788 belongs to the family Amaryllidaceae and order Asparagales [1]. Leighton [2] revised the genus and recognized ten species: four evergreen species which areA. africanus (L.) Hoffmanns,A. comptonii F.M. Leight,A. praecox Willd., andA. walshii L. Bolus and six deciduous species, namely,A. campanulatus F.M. Leight,A. caulescens Spreng,A. coddii F.M. Leight, A. dyeri F.M. Leight, A. inapertus (L. Bolus) F.M. Leight, andA. nutans F.M. Leight. However, based on the nuclear DNA content and pollen morphology as well as vitality, Zonneveld and Duncan [3] recognized six species in total comprising of two evergreen species which areA. africanus (L.) Hoffmannsand A. praecox Willd. and four deciduous species,A. campanulatus F.M. Leight,A. caulescens Spreng, A. coddii F.M. Leight, andA. inapertus (L. Bolus) F.M. Leight. The genus has been difficult to classify due to high rate of hybridization within member species which has led to array of garden hybrids with similar macromorphological features [4]. This accounts for the numerous misidentifications of the members of this genus.Agapanthus praecox is an evergreen species of genusAgapanthus; it is commonly called blue lily, agapanthus, Africa lily, or lily of the Nile. It is an extremely variable species consisting of three subspecies: subsp.praecox, subsp.orientalis, and subsp.minimus. It is a rhizomatous perennial herb with a large basal tuft of dark green shiny leaves. The leaves are linear, strap-like, and 20–80 cm long by 2–6 cm wide. The blue to violet flowers are clustered in an umbellate inflorescence, 10–15 cm across, which is held high above the leaves on a stout shiny stalk to 1 m high. The individual flowers have 6 tepals, 4–6 mm long, and 6 stamens and 3 carpels with greenish capsules as fruits (Figure 1).Figure 1
Morphological features ofAgapanthus praecox showing the leaves and the umbel inflorescence.It is one of the widely used and highly valued medicinal plants in South African folkloric medicine.A. praecox is considered a plant of fertility and pregnancy; it is used with other plants taken during pregnancy to prevent complications, augment labour, and ensure delivery of healthy child [5]. It is also used by the traditional healers for the treatment of heart disease, paralysis, coughs, colds, and chest discomforts [6]. The root’s decoction is given to sheep and goats as antidiarrhoea [7]. It possesses anti-inflammatory, antioedema, antitussive, immunoregulatory, antibacterial, antifungal, and antitumor properties [5]. The leaves are used to hold dressings in place and wound around wrists to bring down fevers [8]. Koduru et al. [9] also reported the anticancer potential of the root infusion. Pooley [10] stated that “bathing the newborn baby with the decoction ofA. praecox makes them strong, keeps them free from bowel problems, and prevents crusts on the head.” It was listed among the plant species traditionally used in Southern Africa for the treatment of various central nervous system-related ailments [11].Medicinal plants are good sources of therapeutic drugs for the treatment and management of various ailments and diseases. Diversity, flexibility, easy accessibility, relative low cost, low levels of technological input, and relative low side effects are some of the positive features of traditional medicine [12]. However, one of the major setbacks in traditional medicine is the species misidentification of the constituents of these herbal medicines. The substitution of the medicinal plants with closely related species poses the problem of adulteration in the herbal products which could be fatal to the consumers. Investigating the morphological and anatomical characters of closely related species is an indispensable tool for the identification of the medicinal herbs [13]. Stuessy [14] emphasized the importance of anatomical characters in differentiating plant species.The broad similar morphological characteristics within the members of the genusAgapanthus have led to substitution ofA. praecox subsp.praecox with other closely related species and this has resulted in adulteration of the herbal products. Species misidentification of herbal drugs due to broad similarity in the morphological features of the medicinal plants and closely related species is common in Africa [15]. The numerous medicinal uses ofAgapanthus praecoxsubsp.praecox and present taxonomic status of genusAgapanthus necessitate its proper identification.Micromorphological characters studies are significant research tools in plant taxonomy; their applications in the identification and delimitation of plant species as well as in resolving taxonomic problems among critical species and genera have been recognized [13]. Trichomes are epidermal appendages that are highly varied in plants; their morphological diversity and distribution have emerged as important supportive taxonomic tools useful in delimiting plant species [16]. Stomata that are highly characteristic of the epidermis occur in widely divergent parts of the plants including common foliage leaves. Variations in stomata type, size, abundance, length, and density are taxonomically important characters that have been recognized as species specific and are used as significant parameters in the angiosperm taxonomy as well as in phylogenetic studies [17].In view of the medicinal importance ofAgapanthus praecox and the present taxonomic confusion in the genusAgapanthus; this study was designed to evaluate the microcharacters of the leaf and rhizome ofAgapanthus praecox with a view to contributing to the knowledge of the genus and generating data to enhance the proper identification and classification of this species.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Plant Collection

Fresh plants ofAgapanthus praecoxsubsp.praecox were collected from the University of Fort Hare, Alice Campus, South Africa, in June, 2016. The plant was identified by Dr. OJ Sharaibi and a voucher specimen (SHAMed 2016/07) was deposited in Giffen’s herbarium of the Department of Botany, University of Fort Hare.


### 2.2. Light Microscopy

The leaf epidermal peels were obtained from the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of fresh matured leaves. They were stained with 1% Safranin-O and dehydrated by concentration series of ethanol. They were mounted on the glass slide and observed under a Zeiss light microscope (Axiovert 40). The photomicrographs were taken with a digital camera (DCM 510, 5 M pixels, and CMOS chip) that was fitted to the light microscope.


### 2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy

Squares of leaves and rhizomes of 4–6 mm thick were cut from the plant using razor blade. They were fixed for 12 h in 4% Glutaraldehyde with PH 7.3 and were rinsed with 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.5). Each sample was later rinsed three times with distilled water before dehydration in a graded ethanol series (10–100%) for 20 min per rinse. Samples were dried in a critical point drier and were mounted on aluminum stubs using two-sided adhesive carbon tape coated with gold palladium (Elko IB-3 Ion Coater). The samples were examined at varying magnifications using JEOL (JSM-6390LV) scanning electron microscope (SEM) that was operated at 10–15 kV accelerated voltage. The energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) followed the same procedures as in scanning electron microscopy. The elemental analysis of the samples was carried out using energy dispersive X-ray analyzer (Thermo Electron Corporation, 6733B-IUUSN, USA) connected to the scanning electron microscope. Electron images were captured using Noran system six imaging software.Epidermal cell shape and thickness; stomata type, location, and distribution; trichomes shape, size, and distribution; the arrangement and position of accessory cells surrounding the guard cells as well as the type of phloem and xylem vessels present were the qualitative features considered. The quantitative features considered were stomata pore length, width, and density; subsidiary cell length, width, and density; trichomes density as well as the distance between the stomata (per mm2) on both the adaxial and abaxial epidermis.


## 2.1. Plant Collection

Fresh plants ofAgapanthus praecoxsubsp.praecox were collected from the University of Fort Hare, Alice Campus, South Africa, in June, 2016. The plant was identified by Dr. OJ Sharaibi and a voucher specimen (SHAMed 2016/07) was deposited in Giffen’s herbarium of the Department of Botany, University of Fort Hare.


## 2.2. Light Microscopy

The leaf epidermal peels were obtained from the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of fresh matured leaves. They were stained with 1% Safranin-O and dehydrated by concentration series of ethanol. They were mounted on the glass slide and observed under a Zeiss light microscope (Axiovert 40). The photomicrographs were taken with a digital camera (DCM 510, 5 M pixels, and CMOS chip) that was fitted to the light microscope.


## 2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy

Squares of leaves and rhizomes of 4–6 mm thick were cut from the plant using razor blade. They were fixed for 12 h in 4% Glutaraldehyde with PH 7.3 and were rinsed with 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.5). Each sample was later rinsed three times with distilled water before dehydration in a graded ethanol series (10–100%) for 20 min per rinse. Samples were dried in a critical point drier and were mounted on aluminum stubs using two-sided adhesive carbon tape coated with gold palladium (Elko IB-3 Ion Coater). The samples were examined at varying magnifications using JEOL (JSM-6390LV) scanning electron microscope (SEM) that was operated at 10–15 kV accelerated voltage. The energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) followed the same procedures as in scanning electron microscopy. The elemental analysis of the samples was carried out using energy dispersive X-ray analyzer (Thermo Electron Corporation, 6733B-IUUSN, USA) connected to the scanning electron microscope. Electron images were captured using Noran system six imaging software.Epidermal cell shape and thickness; stomata type, location, and distribution; trichomes shape, size, and distribution; the arrangement and position of accessory cells surrounding the guard cells as well as the type of phloem and xylem vessels present were the qualitative features considered. The quantitative features considered were stomata pore length, width, and density; subsidiary cell length, width, and density; trichomes density as well as the distance between the stomata (per mm2) on both the adaxial and abaxial epidermis.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Foliar Micromorphological Characters

#### 3.1.1. Leaf Epidermal Cells

These are polygonal in shape with wavy anticlinal walls on both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. They were bigger and thicker on the abaxial surface than on the adaxial surface. Stomata were present on these surfaces but trichomes and secretory ducts were absent. The mean adaxial epidermal cell length was 80.04 ± 0.5μm and the mean adaxial epidermal cell width was 20.13 ± 1.2 μm while the mean abaxial epidermal length was 85.33 ± 0.6 μm and the mean width was 17.78 ± 0.5 μm. The number of epidermal cell counts ranges from 180 to 230 per mm2 on adaxial surface while the number of epidermal cell counts on abaxial surface ranges from 250 to 300 per mm2 (Figure 2).Figure 2
SEM micrographs of adaxial (a, b) and abaxial (c, d) epidermal cells ofA. praecox subsp.praecox (EC = epidermal cells).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


#### 3.1.2. Stomata

Both the abaxial and adaxial surfaces were characterized by anomocytic stomata which were more prevalent on the abaxial than the adaxial surface. The stomata lack subsidiary cells and were amphistomatically distributed on both surfaces. They were randomly arranged on both surfaces. The stomata were fully opened on both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. The mean stomata pore length on the adaxial surface was 22.14 ± 0.2μm and the mean adaxial stomata pore width was 21.05 ± 1.0 μm while the mean abaxial stomata pore length was 15.02 ± 0.3 μm with mean stomata pore width of 10.03 μm. The mean stomata density on the abaxial surface was 280.5 ± 0.5 mm2 while the mean stomata density on the abaxial surface was 350.6 ± 0.6 mm2. The guard cells length on both surfaces was 22.3 ± 1.2 μm; the guard cells density on the adaxial surface was 345.7 ± 0.7 mm2. The distance between the adaxial stomata was 45.6 ± 0.8 μm while the distance between the abaxial stomata was 21.2 ± 0.4 μm (Figures 3, 4, and 5).Figure 3
Photomicrographs of the light microscopy of adaxial (a, b) and abaxial (c, d) ofA. praecox subsp.praecox showing anomocytic stomata and polygonal epidermal cells (EC = epidermal cells; ANS = anomocytic stomata).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 4
SEM micrographs (a–f) of abaxial epidermis ofA. praecox subsp.praecox showing randomly arranged anomocytic stomata with open pores at different magnifications (ANS = anomocytic stomata).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)Figure 5
Scanning electron micrographs (a–f) of foliar adaxial epidermis ofA. praecoxsubsp.praecox showing anomocytic stomata with open pores at different magnifications (ANS = anomocytic stomata).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


### 3.2. Rhizome Microcharacters

The rhizome micromorphology ofA. praecox was characterized with xylem vessels with helical secondary wall, that is, the protoxylem and some unusual outgrowths. At high magnifications, these outgrowths were similar to the trichomes but could not be categorized as such. Xylem vessels and tracheids made up the bulk of the vascular bundles and were more conspicuous than the phloem tissues. There are crystal deposits around the xylem vessels as shown in Figures 6 and 7.Figure 6
Scanning electron micrographs (a–d) ofA. praecoxsubsp.praecox rhizome showing the xylem (XY), phloem (PH), tracheids (TR), and helical thickened vessels (HV).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 7
SEM micrographs ofA. praecoxsubsp.praecox rhizome showing (a) crystal deposits around the tracheids and (b) the xylem vessel (CR = crystal deposits).
(a)
(b)


### 3.3. Energy Dispersive X-Ray (EDX) Spectroscopy

The EDX analyzes some points of the adaxial and abaxial foliar epidermal layers and the rhizomes ofA. praecox revealed the presence of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), phosphorous (P), beryllium (Be), silicon (Si), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), oxygen (O), and gold (Au) assumed to be derived from the gold plating (Figures 8 and 9). The percentage atomic quantification of the elements as shown by EDX spectroscopy presented in Table 1 showed that beryllium (Be), carbon (C), oxygen (O), sodium (Na), and silicon (Si) were present on both the abaxial and adaxial epidermal surfaces as well as in the rhizome. Nitrogen (8.42 ± 2.19), aluminum (0.34 ± 0.04), and chlorine (0.14 ± 0.05) were detected only on the second point of the adaxial epidermal surface while sulphur was present only in the rhizome.Table 1
Percentage atomic compositions of the elements inA. praecox foliar epidermal surfaces and the rhizome by EDX spectroscopy.
Elements
Abaxial
Adaxial (1)
Adaxial (2)
Rhizome
Beryllium
25.03 ± 0.86
21.67 ± 0.75
17.69 ± 0.56
25.08 ± 0.93
Carbon
68.06 ± 1.09
62.06 ± 1.00
52.38 ± 1.18
68.32 ± 1.17
Nitrogen
0
0
8.42 ± 2.19
0
Oxygen
6.01 ± 0.36
6.90 ± 0.33
11.13 ± 0.72
5.99 ± 0.39
Sodium
0.09 ± 0.04
0.14 ± 0.04
0.06 ± 0.05
0.03 ± 0.03
Magnesium
0.12 ± 0.03
0
0.11 ± 0.03
0.05 ± 0.03
Aluminium
0
0
0.34 ± 0.04
0
Silicon
0.05 ± 0.04
0.15 ± 0.03
0.43 ± 0.05
0.20 ± 0.04
Phosphorous
0.08 ± 0.07
0
0.13 ± 0.09
0
Sulphur
0
0
0
0.04 ± 0.04
Chlorine
0
0
0.14 ± 0.05
0
Potassium
0.10 ± 0.05
0.19 ± 0.05
0
0.13 ± 0.05
Calcium
0.24 ± 0.05
0.21 ± 0.05
0
0.13 ± 0.06
Iron
0.12 ± 0.12
0
0
0
Gold
8.55 ± 3.19
0
0
0Figure 8
EDX photomicrographs and spectra of the adaxial (a) and abaxial epidermis (b) ofA. praecox.Figure 9
EDX photomicrographs and spectral of adaxial epidermis and rhizome ofA. praecox.


## 3.1. Foliar Micromorphological Characters

### 3.1.1. Leaf Epidermal Cells

These are polygonal in shape with wavy anticlinal walls on both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. They were bigger and thicker on the abaxial surface than on the adaxial surface. Stomata were present on these surfaces but trichomes and secretory ducts were absent. The mean adaxial epidermal cell length was 80.04 ± 0.5μm and the mean adaxial epidermal cell width was 20.13 ± 1.2 μm while the mean abaxial epidermal length was 85.33 ± 0.6 μm and the mean width was 17.78 ± 0.5 μm. The number of epidermal cell counts ranges from 180 to 230 per mm2 on adaxial surface while the number of epidermal cell counts on abaxial surface ranges from 250 to 300 per mm2 (Figure 2).Figure 2
SEM micrographs of adaxial (a, b) and abaxial (c, d) epidermal cells ofA. praecox subsp.praecox (EC = epidermal cells).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.1.2. Stomata

Both the abaxial and adaxial surfaces were characterized by anomocytic stomata which were more prevalent on the abaxial than the adaxial surface. The stomata lack subsidiary cells and were amphistomatically distributed on both surfaces. They were randomly arranged on both surfaces. The stomata were fully opened on both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. The mean stomata pore length on the adaxial surface was 22.14 ± 0.2μm and the mean adaxial stomata pore width was 21.05 ± 1.0 μm while the mean abaxial stomata pore length was 15.02 ± 0.3 μm with mean stomata pore width of 10.03 μm. The mean stomata density on the abaxial surface was 280.5 ± 0.5 mm2 while the mean stomata density on the abaxial surface was 350.6 ± 0.6 mm2. The guard cells length on both surfaces was 22.3 ± 1.2 μm; the guard cells density on the adaxial surface was 345.7 ± 0.7 mm2. The distance between the adaxial stomata was 45.6 ± 0.8 μm while the distance between the abaxial stomata was 21.2 ± 0.4 μm (Figures 3, 4, and 5).Figure 3
Photomicrographs of the light microscopy of adaxial (a, b) and abaxial (c, d) ofA. praecox subsp.praecox showing anomocytic stomata and polygonal epidermal cells (EC = epidermal cells; ANS = anomocytic stomata).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 4
SEM micrographs (a–f) of abaxial epidermis ofA. praecox subsp.praecox showing randomly arranged anomocytic stomata with open pores at different magnifications (ANS = anomocytic stomata).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)Figure 5
Scanning electron micrographs (a–f) of foliar adaxial epidermis ofA. praecoxsubsp.praecox showing anomocytic stomata with open pores at different magnifications (ANS = anomocytic stomata).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


## 3.1.1. Leaf Epidermal Cells

These are polygonal in shape with wavy anticlinal walls on both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. They were bigger and thicker on the abaxial surface than on the adaxial surface. Stomata were present on these surfaces but trichomes and secretory ducts were absent. The mean adaxial epidermal cell length was 80.04 ± 0.5μm and the mean adaxial epidermal cell width was 20.13 ± 1.2 μm while the mean abaxial epidermal length was 85.33 ± 0.6 μm and the mean width was 17.78 ± 0.5 μm. The number of epidermal cell counts ranges from 180 to 230 per mm2 on adaxial surface while the number of epidermal cell counts on abaxial surface ranges from 250 to 300 per mm2 (Figure 2).Figure 2
SEM micrographs of adaxial (a, b) and abaxial (c, d) epidermal cells ofA. praecox subsp.praecox (EC = epidermal cells).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.1.2. Stomata

Both the abaxial and adaxial surfaces were characterized by anomocytic stomata which were more prevalent on the abaxial than the adaxial surface. The stomata lack subsidiary cells and were amphistomatically distributed on both surfaces. They were randomly arranged on both surfaces. The stomata were fully opened on both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. The mean stomata pore length on the adaxial surface was 22.14 ± 0.2μm and the mean adaxial stomata pore width was 21.05 ± 1.0 μm while the mean abaxial stomata pore length was 15.02 ± 0.3 μm with mean stomata pore width of 10.03 μm. The mean stomata density on the abaxial surface was 280.5 ± 0.5 mm2 while the mean stomata density on the abaxial surface was 350.6 ± 0.6 mm2. The guard cells length on both surfaces was 22.3 ± 1.2 μm; the guard cells density on the adaxial surface was 345.7 ± 0.7 mm2. The distance between the adaxial stomata was 45.6 ± 0.8 μm while the distance between the abaxial stomata was 21.2 ± 0.4 μm (Figures 3, 4, and 5).Figure 3
Photomicrographs of the light microscopy of adaxial (a, b) and abaxial (c, d) ofA. praecox subsp.praecox showing anomocytic stomata and polygonal epidermal cells (EC = epidermal cells; ANS = anomocytic stomata).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 4
SEM micrographs (a–f) of abaxial epidermis ofA. praecox subsp.praecox showing randomly arranged anomocytic stomata with open pores at different magnifications (ANS = anomocytic stomata).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)Figure 5
Scanning electron micrographs (a–f) of foliar adaxial epidermis ofA. praecoxsubsp.praecox showing anomocytic stomata with open pores at different magnifications (ANS = anomocytic stomata).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


## 3.2. Rhizome Microcharacters

The rhizome micromorphology ofA. praecox was characterized with xylem vessels with helical secondary wall, that is, the protoxylem and some unusual outgrowths. At high magnifications, these outgrowths were similar to the trichomes but could not be categorized as such. Xylem vessels and tracheids made up the bulk of the vascular bundles and were more conspicuous than the phloem tissues. There are crystal deposits around the xylem vessels as shown in Figures 6 and 7.Figure 6
Scanning electron micrographs (a–d) ofA. praecoxsubsp.praecox rhizome showing the xylem (XY), phloem (PH), tracheids (TR), and helical thickened vessels (HV).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 7
SEM micrographs ofA. praecoxsubsp.praecox rhizome showing (a) crystal deposits around the tracheids and (b) the xylem vessel (CR = crystal deposits).
(a)
(b)


## 3.3. Energy Dispersive X-Ray (EDX) Spectroscopy

The EDX analyzes some points of the adaxial and abaxial foliar epidermal layers and the rhizomes ofA. praecox revealed the presence of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), phosphorous (P), beryllium (Be), silicon (Si), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), oxygen (O), and gold (Au) assumed to be derived from the gold plating (Figures 8 and 9). The percentage atomic quantification of the elements as shown by EDX spectroscopy presented in Table 1 showed that beryllium (Be), carbon (C), oxygen (O), sodium (Na), and silicon (Si) were present on both the abaxial and adaxial epidermal surfaces as well as in the rhizome. Nitrogen (8.42 ± 2.19), aluminum (0.34 ± 0.04), and chlorine (0.14 ± 0.05) were detected only on the second point of the adaxial epidermal surface while sulphur was present only in the rhizome.Table 1
Percentage atomic compositions of the elements inA. praecox foliar epidermal surfaces and the rhizome by EDX spectroscopy.
Elements
Abaxial
Adaxial (1)
Adaxial (2)
Rhizome
Beryllium
25.03 ± 0.86
21.67 ± 0.75
17.69 ± 0.56
25.08 ± 0.93
Carbon
68.06 ± 1.09
62.06 ± 1.00
52.38 ± 1.18
68.32 ± 1.17
Nitrogen
0
0
8.42 ± 2.19
0
Oxygen
6.01 ± 0.36
6.90 ± 0.33
11.13 ± 0.72
5.99 ± 0.39
Sodium
0.09 ± 0.04
0.14 ± 0.04
0.06 ± 0.05
0.03 ± 0.03
Magnesium
0.12 ± 0.03
0
0.11 ± 0.03
0.05 ± 0.03
Aluminium
0
0
0.34 ± 0.04
0
Silicon
0.05 ± 0.04
0.15 ± 0.03
0.43 ± 0.05
0.20 ± 0.04
Phosphorous
0.08 ± 0.07
0
0.13 ± 0.09
0
Sulphur
0
0
0
0.04 ± 0.04
Chlorine
0
0
0.14 ± 0.05
0
Potassium
0.10 ± 0.05
0.19 ± 0.05
0
0.13 ± 0.05
Calcium
0.24 ± 0.05
0.21 ± 0.05
0
0.13 ± 0.06
Iron
0.12 ± 0.12
0
0
0
Gold
8.55 ± 3.19
0
0
0Figure 8
EDX photomicrographs and spectra of the adaxial (a) and abaxial epidermis (b) ofA. praecox.Figure 9
EDX photomicrographs and spectral of adaxial epidermis and rhizome ofA. praecox.


## 4. Discussion

The dart of information on the microcharacters of the genusAgapanthus necessitated this work. This study presents the microcharacters ofA. praecoxsubsp.praecox that are of taxonomic importance. The presence of polygonal epidermal cells with wavy anticlinal walls inA. praecox subsp.praecox may be an important diagnostic character that may be helpful in delimitingAgapanthus species. It has been reported that variations in leaf epidermal cell size, shape, and thickness form the basis for the taxonomic position of some angiosperm families [18]. Stomata are highly characteristics of the leaf epidermis and occupy prominent position on the leaf surfaces. Da Silva et al. [19] stated that combining leaf epidermal data with the quantitative stomata data (density, length, and width) can enhance the information concerning species identification. Both the abaxial and adaxial surfaces ofA. praecox are characterized by anomocytic stomata which are amphistomatically distributed and are more abundant on the abaxial than the adaxial surface. Anomocytic stomata may be a diagnostic character of the family Amaryllidaceae as earlier work by Awasthi et al. [20] reported the presence of anomocytic stomata in nineteen species of Amaryllidaceae studied. Stomata abundance on the abaxial than adaxial epidermal surface ofA. praecoxsubsp.praecox is a natural phenomenon in most angiosperms and an adaptation for water conservation [21]. Stomata size is consistently higher on the abaxial surface than on the adaxial surface; this can also be a mechanism to reduce transpiration.The absence of trichomes and secretory ducts on the leaf epidermis ofA. praecox may be an indication that the bioactive compounds are produced and stored in other tissues aside the trichomes in contradiction to Koduru et al. [22] who reported that bioactive compounds are produced or stored in the trichomes.The scanning electron microscopy of the rhizome ofA. praecox revealed the presence of vessels with helical thickened secondary wall. The presence of helical thickened secondary wall is typical of protoxylem. SEM micrographs showed the metaxylem pit membranes with numerous holes of various sizes. These holes may represent thin areas in the pit membrane, revealed only when portions of the pit membrane are shaved away by the sectioning. Crystals are estimated to occur in almost all the plants; they are found on the surfaces of roots, bark, stems, leaves, flowers, fruits, and seeds. They are categorized as sands, druses, styloids, raphides, prisms, and crystal sands and exhibit various sizes and shapes [23]. Their biological roles include calcium ionic balance, protection against herbivory, mechanical support to plants, and tolerance to heavy metal [24]. Deposition of the crystals on the surface of the xylem tracheary elements ofA. praecox gives mechanical support to the plant in addition to water conduction. Also, since trichomes and secretory ducts are absent inA. praecox, most of the phytochemicals responsible for the therapeutic activities ofA. praecox may be produced and stored in the xylem tracheary elements. The results of the EDX spectroscopy revealed that the major elements of the crystals present on the leaf and rhizome ofA. praecox were beryllium (25.03 ± 0.86%), carbon (68.06 ± 1.09%), and oxygen (6.01 ± 0.36%). Though, aluminum, potassium, sodium, and silicon were present but in trace amounts. This contradicts the results of Aliero et al. [25] who reported that foliar crystals in some plants majorly composed of aluminum, potassium, sodium, and silicon. The high amount of carbon in the EDX spectra of both the leaves and rhizomes ofA. praecox may be the source of strength observed in the babies fed with infusion of this plant. This study provides for the first time comprehensive micromorphological information of the leaves and rhizomes ofAgapanthus praecox subsp.praecox.


## 5. Conclusion

This study is a positive step in resolving the taxonomic confusion that exists in the genusAgapanthus. The presence of anomocytic stomata, polygonal epidermal cells with wavy anticlinal walls, helical thickened vessels, and xylem tracheary elements with crystals as well as the absence of trichomes and secretory ducts inA. praecoxsubsp.praecox may be useful tools in the identification of this species from the closely related species ofAgapanthus. Though, further comparative micromorphological studies within species of this genus are recommended; this study was able to provide information on the microcharacters of the leaves and rhizomes ofA. praecoxsubsp.praecox.



---

*Source: 3075638-2017-07-26.xml*