# Vinyl Ester Oligomer Crosslinked Porous Polymers Prepared via Surfactant-Free High Internal Phase Emulsions

Authors: Yun Zhu; Ye Hua; Shengmiao Zhang; Jianding Chen; Chun Pu Hu
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Using vinyl ester resin (VER) containing styrene (or methyl methacrylate) and vinyl ester oligomer (VEO) as external phase, Pickering high internal phase emulsions (Pickering HIPEs) having internal phase volume fraction of up to 95 vol% were prepared with copolymer particles as sole stabilizer. Polymerizing the external phase of these Pickering HIPEs led to porous polymers (poly-Pickering-HIPEs). Compared to the polystyrene- (PS-) based poly-Pickering-HIPEs which were prepared with mixture of styrene and divinylbenzene (DVB) as crosslinker, the poly-Pickering-HIPEs herein showed much higher elastic modulus and toughness. The elastic modulus of these poly-Pickering-HIPEs increased with increasing the VEO concentration in the external phase, while it decreased with increasing internal phase volume fraction. Increasing VEO concentration in the external phase also resulted in a decrease in the average void diameter as well as a narrow void diameter distribution of the resulting poly-Pickering-HIPEs. In addition, there were many small pores in the voids surface caused by the volume contraction of VER during the polymerization, which suggests a new method to fabricate porous polymers having a well-defined hierarchical pore structure.


---

## Body

## 1.  Introduction

High internal phase emulsions (HIPEs) are defined as emulsions, in which the internal phase occupies higher than 74.05 vol% of the emulsion. These emulsions are important for a wide range of applications in the food, cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and petroleum industries [1, 2]. Recently, increasing interests are attracted to use the emulsions as templates for the production of highly porous polymers (known as polyHIPEs) [3–16]. Such materials are prepared by polymerizing the thin films that surround the droplets of the HIPEs if the continuous phase contains one or more monomeric species that are polymerizable. Conversional HIPEs are commonly stabilized against coalescence by large fractions (5–50 vol%) of nonionic surfactant [2, 13]. The sheer quantity of surfactant required to stabilize HIPEs both limits properties and is a major cost factor.To eliminate the surfactants used in HIPEs, the authors, and other groups, have prepared HIPEs using organic or inorganic particles as stabilizer [3–9, 16]. Such emulsions are known as Pickering HIPEs. And the porous polymers based on this type of emulsions are known as poly-Pickering-HIPEs. By far, the most widely studied monomer used in poly-Pickering-HIPEs is styrene (St). Usually, a varied amount of hydrophobic crosslinker, such as divinylbenzene (DVB), is also added to enhance the structural stability [16, 17]. This porous polymer is being considered for many applications such as filtration media and support for heterogenic catalytic reactions and has even been explored for tissue engineering application, that is, as scaffold to support the growth of osteoblast cells [17–20]. However, it is difficult to use polystyrene- (PS-) based poly-Pickering-HIPEs as commercial production because of their undesirable properties, such as brittleness and chalkiness.In order to enhance the mechanical properties of PS-based poly-Pickering-HIPEs, during the course of the work on developing novel poly-Pickering-HIPEs, the authors undertook the preparation of species containing vinyl ester resin (VER). Generally, VER is a mixture of St with methacrylated epoxy compounds (often referred to as vinyl ester oligomer (VEO)) [21, 22]. In this case, styrene is a reactive diluent, and VEO serves as a crosslinking agent for preparing poly-Pickering-HIPEs. VER has superior properties relative to unsaturated polyester systems and is easy to process.In this study, VER-based poly-Pickering-HIPEs were prepared using poly(styrene-co-methyl methacrylate-co-acrylic acid) (P(St-co-MMA-co-AA)) copolymer particles as stabilizer. The elastic modulus of the porous polymers was investigated, and the morphology of these porous materials was also tailored by changing internal phase (aqueous phase) volume fraction and VEO concentration in organic phase. In addition, poly(methyl methacrylate)- (PMMA-) based poly-Pickering-HIPEs were also prepared with mixture of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and VEO as organic phase.


## 2. Experimental Section

### 2.1. Materials

Styrene (St, 99%), methyl methacrylate (MMA, 99%), and acrylic acid (AA, 98%) were purchased from Shanghai Lingfeng Chemical Reagent Ltd. Co. and were distilled under a reduced-pressure nitrogen atmosphere before use. Divinylbenzene (DVB, 80%, the remainder being m- and p-ethylstyrene,) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich and was purified by passing through neutral chromatographic aluminum oxide to eliminate the inhibitor. Ammonium persulphate (APS, 98%) was purchased from Shanghai Lingfeng Chemical Reagent Ltd. Co. and was purified via recrystallization. Sodium chloride (NaCl) was purchased from Shanghai Experiment Reagent Ltd. Co. and was used as received. E-51 epoxy resin (bisphenol A-type, 0.51 epoxide equivalent/100 g resin) was produced by Shanghai Synthetic Resin.α-methacrylic acid (α-MAA, 97%), tetrabutyl ammonium bromide (TBAB, 99%), and 1,4-hydroquinone (HQ, 99%), were purchased from Shanghai Lingfeng Chemical Reagent Ltd. Co. and were used as received. Water was fresh deionized.


### 2.2. Synthesis of Vinyl Ester Oligomer

VEO was synthesized by the reaction of epoxy resin and methacrylic acid as shown in Figure1. All the synthesis and characterization of VEO were described in detail elsewhere [22–24]. Thus, a mixture of 1 mol E-51, TBAB (0.1 wt%, relative to E-51), and HQ (0.03 wt%, relative to E-51) was added to a 500 mL three-neck flask equipped with an overhead leaf-shaped stirrer paddle and a condenser. After the nitrogen was bubbled through the mixture for 30 min, the temperature of the mixture was elevated to 90°C, and then 2 mol α-MAA was added dropwise to the mixture with stirring. After the addition of α-MAA, the temperature of the mixture was elevated gradually to 110°C and kept at 110°C. When the acid number (AN) of the mixture was below 6 mgKOH/g (determined according to GB 2895-82), the reaction continued under vacuum to reduce the AN further (AN < 0.6 mgKOH/g), and the VEO was obtained. The St (or MMA) was then introduced into this VEO to prepare the VER (VEO/St (or MMA) = 64/36, wt/wt). The resulting VER was designated as VER-St (or VER-MMA).Figure 1
Synthetic schemes of VEO.


### 2.3. Preparation and Characterization of P(St-co-MMA-co-AA) Copolymer Particles

The preparation of monodisperse P(St-co-MMA-co-AA) particles has been reported elsewhere [25]. Water (100 mL) containing APS of 7.0 × 10−3mol L−1 was added to a four-necked glass reactor (250 mL) with an overhead leaf-shaped stirrer paddle and a condenser. Then the mixture consisted of 18.2 g St, 0.8 g MMA, and 1.0 g AA was added to the reactor. The mixture was stirred steadily at 200 rpm and left at 70°C for 12 h, before it was cooled to room temperature. The average particle size of the copolymer particles is 240±6 nm, as determined from transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-1200EX II, Japan). The composition of the copolymer was obtained by 1H-NMR spectral. A sample of the latex particles was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 40 min after the polymerization was completed and then washed with distilled water. After repetition of this, the particles were dried 48 h under vacuum at 60°C. The 1H-NMR spectra of the copolymer sample were recorded with a 500 MHz high-resolution NMR spectrometer (AVANCE 500) using deuterated chloroform as solvent. 1H-NMR spectra data showed that the copolymer obtained here consisted of 92, 3.85, and 4.15 wt% of St, MMA, and AA unit, respectively.


### 2.4. Preparation and Characterization of Surfactant-Free HIPEs

Appropriate VER-St, VER-MMA, or mixture of St and DVB as organic phase was added to a 100 mL beaker and was stirred with a magnetic stirrer at 400 rpm for 5 min at 25°C. Aqueous phase containing P(St-co-MMA-co-AA) particles of 1.0 wt% and NaCl of 0.2 mol L−1 was gradually added to the organic phase. The total liquid volume of each emulsion was kept at 30 mL. The mixture was further stirred for 1 min after the addition of aqueous phase was completed. The component of the runs was shown in Tables 1 and 2. The resulting emulsions were named as SVX-Y, MVX-Y, or SDX-Y. SV (MV or SD) means VER-St (VER-MMA or the mixture of St and DVB) was used as the organic phase; X represents the concentration of the crosslinking agent (VEO or DVB) in the organic phase;  Y represents the water phase volume percentage in the emulsion.Table 1
Poly-Pickering-HIPEs via varied VEO concentrations in VER-Sta.
RunVEOb/wt%Dvc/μmEd/MPaSV0-900902.1SV10-90106812.2SV20-90204016.8SV40-90401824.6SV50-9050——aThe NaCl concentration (relative to the aqueous phase) was 0.2 mol L−1, the copolymer particles content (relative to the aqueous phase) was 1.0 wt%, and the aqueous phase volume fraction was 90%.bRelative to the organic phase.cAverage void diameter, calculated from SEM images.dElastic modulus.Table 2
With VER-St or VER-MMA as organic phase, poly-Pickering-HIPEs were prepared via varied aqueous phase volume fractiona.
Runbfwc/%Dvd/μmEe/MPaSV20-80801724.8SV20-90904016.8SV20-9595631.1SV20-9797——MV20-80802022.3MV20-90904115.4MV20-95951221.8MV20-9797——aThe NaCl concentration (relative to the aqueous phase) was 0.2 mol L−1, and the copolymer particles content (relative to the aqueous phase) was 1.0 wt%.bSV20-80, SV20-90, SV20-95, and SV20-97: VER-St containing VEO of 20 wt% as organic phase; MV20-80, MV20-90, MV20-95, and MV20-97: VER-MMA containing VEO of 20 wt% as organic phase.cAqueous phase volume fraction.dAverage void diameter, calculated from SEM images.eElastic modulus.Stability of HIPEs was evaluated by measuring the backscattering of monochromatic light (λ=880 nm) from the suspension employing an optical analyzer, Turbiscan Lab Expert (Formulaction, France). As soon as the HIPEs were prepared, about 22 mL HIPE was transferred to a flat-bottomed cylindrical glass tube (70 mm height, 27.5 mm external diameter), then the tube was placed in the instrument, and the backscattering of light from emulsion was periodically measured along the height at 25°C. The results are presented as the sedimentation profile, that is, backscattering data versus time. The photographs of the samples were taken on digital camera (Coolpix-L1, Nikon).


### 2.5. Preparation and Characterization of Poly-Pickering-HIPEs

Stable HIPEs were initiated by 1 wt% (relative to the aqueous phase) APS and polymerized in water bath at 70°C for 24 h. The resulting poly-Pickering-HIPEs were removed from the molds and dried in vacuum at 70°C for 24 h then extracted in Soxhlet apparatus with distilled water to remove any impurities. Finally, the resulting polymers were dried to constant weight in vacuum at 70°C.The morphology of polyHIPEs was detected by a JSM-6360LV SEM. Samples were mounted on aluminum studs using adhesive graphite tape and sputter coated with approximately 5 nm of gold before analysis. The average void diameters of the poly-Pickering-HIPEs were performed using image analysis software Image J (NIH image) [26].A Sans Universal Testing Machine equipped with a 20 kN load cell (Shenzhen SANS Testing Machine Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China) was used to measure mechanical properties in compression. The samples were loaded at a rate of 1 mm/min. Five samples of 20 mm in diameter and 10 mm in height were tested for each poly-Pickering-HIPE. The samples were loaded until a displacement of half the height of the examined sample was reached. The elastic modulus (E) was determined from the initial linear slope of the stress/strain plot.


## 2.1. Materials

Styrene (St, 99%), methyl methacrylate (MMA, 99%), and acrylic acid (AA, 98%) were purchased from Shanghai Lingfeng Chemical Reagent Ltd. Co. and were distilled under a reduced-pressure nitrogen atmosphere before use. Divinylbenzene (DVB, 80%, the remainder being m- and p-ethylstyrene,) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich and was purified by passing through neutral chromatographic aluminum oxide to eliminate the inhibitor. Ammonium persulphate (APS, 98%) was purchased from Shanghai Lingfeng Chemical Reagent Ltd. Co. and was purified via recrystallization. Sodium chloride (NaCl) was purchased from Shanghai Experiment Reagent Ltd. Co. and was used as received. E-51 epoxy resin (bisphenol A-type, 0.51 epoxide equivalent/100 g resin) was produced by Shanghai Synthetic Resin.α-methacrylic acid (α-MAA, 97%), tetrabutyl ammonium bromide (TBAB, 99%), and 1,4-hydroquinone (HQ, 99%), were purchased from Shanghai Lingfeng Chemical Reagent Ltd. Co. and were used as received. Water was fresh deionized.


## 2.2. Synthesis of Vinyl Ester Oligomer

VEO was synthesized by the reaction of epoxy resin and methacrylic acid as shown in Figure1. All the synthesis and characterization of VEO were described in detail elsewhere [22–24]. Thus, a mixture of 1 mol E-51, TBAB (0.1 wt%, relative to E-51), and HQ (0.03 wt%, relative to E-51) was added to a 500 mL three-neck flask equipped with an overhead leaf-shaped stirrer paddle and a condenser. After the nitrogen was bubbled through the mixture for 30 min, the temperature of the mixture was elevated to 90°C, and then 2 mol α-MAA was added dropwise to the mixture with stirring. After the addition of α-MAA, the temperature of the mixture was elevated gradually to 110°C and kept at 110°C. When the acid number (AN) of the mixture was below 6 mgKOH/g (determined according to GB 2895-82), the reaction continued under vacuum to reduce the AN further (AN < 0.6 mgKOH/g), and the VEO was obtained. The St (or MMA) was then introduced into this VEO to prepare the VER (VEO/St (or MMA) = 64/36, wt/wt). The resulting VER was designated as VER-St (or VER-MMA).Figure 1
Synthetic schemes of VEO.


## 2.3. Preparation and Characterization of P(St-co-MMA-co-AA) Copolymer Particles

The preparation of monodisperse P(St-co-MMA-co-AA) particles has been reported elsewhere [25]. Water (100 mL) containing APS of 7.0 × 10−3mol L−1 was added to a four-necked glass reactor (250 mL) with an overhead leaf-shaped stirrer paddle and a condenser. Then the mixture consisted of 18.2 g St, 0.8 g MMA, and 1.0 g AA was added to the reactor. The mixture was stirred steadily at 200 rpm and left at 70°C for 12 h, before it was cooled to room temperature. The average particle size of the copolymer particles is 240±6 nm, as determined from transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-1200EX II, Japan). The composition of the copolymer was obtained by 1H-NMR spectral. A sample of the latex particles was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 40 min after the polymerization was completed and then washed with distilled water. After repetition of this, the particles were dried 48 h under vacuum at 60°C. The 1H-NMR spectra of the copolymer sample were recorded with a 500 MHz high-resolution NMR spectrometer (AVANCE 500) using deuterated chloroform as solvent. 1H-NMR spectra data showed that the copolymer obtained here consisted of 92, 3.85, and 4.15 wt% of St, MMA, and AA unit, respectively.


## 2.4. Preparation and Characterization of Surfactant-Free HIPEs

Appropriate VER-St, VER-MMA, or mixture of St and DVB as organic phase was added to a 100 mL beaker and was stirred with a magnetic stirrer at 400 rpm for 5 min at 25°C. Aqueous phase containing P(St-co-MMA-co-AA) particles of 1.0 wt% and NaCl of 0.2 mol L−1 was gradually added to the organic phase. The total liquid volume of each emulsion was kept at 30 mL. The mixture was further stirred for 1 min after the addition of aqueous phase was completed. The component of the runs was shown in Tables 1 and 2. The resulting emulsions were named as SVX-Y, MVX-Y, or SDX-Y. SV (MV or SD) means VER-St (VER-MMA or the mixture of St and DVB) was used as the organic phase; X represents the concentration of the crosslinking agent (VEO or DVB) in the organic phase;  Y represents the water phase volume percentage in the emulsion.Table 1
Poly-Pickering-HIPEs via varied VEO concentrations in VER-Sta.
RunVEOb/wt%Dvc/μmEd/MPaSV0-900902.1SV10-90106812.2SV20-90204016.8SV40-90401824.6SV50-9050——aThe NaCl concentration (relative to the aqueous phase) was 0.2 mol L−1, the copolymer particles content (relative to the aqueous phase) was 1.0 wt%, and the aqueous phase volume fraction was 90%.bRelative to the organic phase.cAverage void diameter, calculated from SEM images.dElastic modulus.Table 2
With VER-St or VER-MMA as organic phase, poly-Pickering-HIPEs were prepared via varied aqueous phase volume fractiona.
Runbfwc/%Dvd/μmEe/MPaSV20-80801724.8SV20-90904016.8SV20-9595631.1SV20-9797——MV20-80802022.3MV20-90904115.4MV20-95951221.8MV20-9797——aThe NaCl concentration (relative to the aqueous phase) was 0.2 mol L−1, and the copolymer particles content (relative to the aqueous phase) was 1.0 wt%.bSV20-80, SV20-90, SV20-95, and SV20-97: VER-St containing VEO of 20 wt% as organic phase; MV20-80, MV20-90, MV20-95, and MV20-97: VER-MMA containing VEO of 20 wt% as organic phase.cAqueous phase volume fraction.dAverage void diameter, calculated from SEM images.eElastic modulus.Stability of HIPEs was evaluated by measuring the backscattering of monochromatic light (λ=880 nm) from the suspension employing an optical analyzer, Turbiscan Lab Expert (Formulaction, France). As soon as the HIPEs were prepared, about 22 mL HIPE was transferred to a flat-bottomed cylindrical glass tube (70 mm height, 27.5 mm external diameter), then the tube was placed in the instrument, and the backscattering of light from emulsion was periodically measured along the height at 25°C. The results are presented as the sedimentation profile, that is, backscattering data versus time. The photographs of the samples were taken on digital camera (Coolpix-L1, Nikon).


## 2.5. Preparation and Characterization of Poly-Pickering-HIPEs

Stable HIPEs were initiated by 1 wt% (relative to the aqueous phase) APS and polymerized in water bath at 70°C for 24 h. The resulting poly-Pickering-HIPEs were removed from the molds and dried in vacuum at 70°C for 24 h then extracted in Soxhlet apparatus with distilled water to remove any impurities. Finally, the resulting polymers were dried to constant weight in vacuum at 70°C.The morphology of polyHIPEs was detected by a JSM-6360LV SEM. Samples were mounted on aluminum studs using adhesive graphite tape and sputter coated with approximately 5 nm of gold before analysis. The average void diameters of the poly-Pickering-HIPEs were performed using image analysis software Image J (NIH image) [26].A Sans Universal Testing Machine equipped with a 20 kN load cell (Shenzhen SANS Testing Machine Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China) was used to measure mechanical properties in compression. The samples were loaded at a rate of 1 mm/min. Five samples of 20 mm in diameter and 10 mm in height were tested for each poly-Pickering-HIPE. The samples were loaded until a displacement of half the height of the examined sample was reached. The elastic modulus (E) was determined from the initial linear slope of the stress/strain plot.


## 3. Results and Discussion

First of all, the emulsification of water and VER-St (containing 10 wt% VEO) was examined with P(St-co-MMA-co-AA) particles as stabilizer. Milky-white W/O emulsion (HIPE SV10-90) was formed after stirring was ceased. The Turbiscan analysis of the emulsion showed that the backscattering data of the emulsion was stable, as shown in Figure2. This means that with VER-St as organic phase, stable w/o HIPE can be formed.Figure 2
Backscattering of the HIPE stabilized by P(St-co-MMA-co-AA) copolymer particles. VER-St was used as organic phase.Initiating the HIPEs SV10-90 and SD10-90, poly-Pickering-HIPEs SV10-90 and SD10-90 were obtained, respectively, as shown in Figure3. The average void diameter (Dv) of the poly-Pickering-HIPEs SV10-90 was 68 μm, and this value was similar to that (64 μm) of the poly-Pickering-HIPEs SD10-90. However, the E (12.2 MPa) of poly-Pickering-HIPE SV10-90 was much higher than that (6.4 MPa) of the poly-Pickering-HIPE SD10-90 and was also much higher than the E (3.0 MPa) of the PS-based polyHIPE prepared with the HIPE having internal phase volume fraction of 89% [27]. Moreover, when the samples were loaded until a displacement of half the height of the examined sample was reached, poly-Pickering-HIPE SD10-90 was crushed, while no crack was observed in poly-Pickering-HIPE SV10-90, as shown in Figure 4. This means that both E and toughness of poly-Pickering-HIPEs can be enhanced appreciably with VEO replacing DVB as crosslinker.Figure 3
SEM images of the poly-Pickering-HIPEs. The water volume fraction of the Pickering emulsion was 90 vol%. SV10-90: VEO as crosslinker, 10 wt% based on the organic phase, (SD10-90): DVB as crosslinker, 10 wt% based on the organic phase.Figure 4
Photograph of the poly-Pickering-HIPEs which were compressed 50%.The effect of VEO on the morphology andE of VER-St-based poly-Pickering-HIPEs was investigated. As shown in Table 1, poly-Pickering-HIPEs with organic phase containing VEO of 0, 10, 20, and 40 wt%, respectively, were prepared (see Figures 3 and 5). It was found that increasing VEO from 0 to 40 wt% resulted in an increase in E by about 22 MPa (Figure 6) and a decrease in Dv by about 70 μm. The decrease in Dv was attributed to the fact that increasing VEO concentration in the organic phase caused an increase in the viscosity of the organic phase, which enhanced the emulsion stability [28, 29] and therefore led to an increasing number of small droplets and the narrow distribution of droplet size. These resulted in the decrease in poly-Pickering-HIPE void diameter and its narrow distribution (see Figure 7), since the porous polymer was effectively a replica of the emulsion structure by gel formation. However, the poly-Pickering-HIPE with organic phase containing 50 wt% of VEO could not be prepared, because the viscosity of the organic phase was too high so that the aqueous phase could not be wrapped effectively by the organic phase.Figure 5
SEM images of VER-based poly-Pickering-HIPEs which were obtained with varied VEO concentrations.Figure 6
Effect of VEO concentration in the organic phase on the elastic modulus of the poly-Pickering-HIPEs. The water volume fraction of the emulsion was 90 vol%, and the NaCl and copolymer particle concentration relative to aqueous phase were 0.2 mol L−1 and 1.0 wt%, respectively.Figure 7
Void diameter distributions of poly-Pickering-HIPEs obtained with varied VEO concentrations. From front to back: SV0-90, SV10-90, SV20-90, and SV40-90.Moreover, increasing the VEO concentration in organic phase also affected the morphology of the void surface. When VER-St containing 0 or 10 wt% VEO was used as organic phase, there were no pores in the void surface. However, when the VER-St containing VEO of 20 or 40 wt% was used, in the void surface many pores with diameters ranged from 20 to 100 nm were observed (see Figure4). In all likelihood, the cause of the pore formation was the volume contraction of VER-St during the polymerization, and the extent of shrinkage highly depended on VEO concentration [30, 31].Using VER-St (or VER-MMA) containing VEO of 20 wt% as organic phase, stable Pickering HIPEs with aqueous phase volume fraction of 80, 90, and 95 vol% were obtained, respectively, as listed in Table2. However, the Pickering HIPEs SV20-97 and MV20-97 having aqueous phase volume fraction of 97 vol% could not be prepared, because the aqueous phase was too much to be wrapped effectively by the organic phase. This phenomenon showed that the up limits of the aqueous phase volume fraction in these Pickering HIPEs were between 95 and 97 vol% which was higher than that (≤92 vol%) of those Pickering HIPEs with inorganic particles (e.g., SiO2 or TiO2) as stabilizer [32, 33]. The polymerizing stable Pickering HIPEs, poly-Pickering-HIPEs SV20-80-SV20-95 and MV20-80-MV20-95 were obtained (as shown in Figures 3 and 8). It was found that increasing aqueous phase volume fraction resulted in an increase in Dv (see the detailed data in Table 2) and a broader distribution of Dv (see Figure 9). This result is consistent with the previous report about poly-Pickering-HIPEs with MMA and St as organic phase [3]. Compress analysis showed that increasing aqueous phase volume fraction caused a significant decrease in E(see Table 2 and Figure 10). This phenomenon was consistent with other researchers’ report [27] and could be due to the fact that increasing aqueous phase of the Pickering HIPEs resulted in a decrease in the density of the resulting porous polymers.Figure 8
SEM images for VER-based poly-Pickering-HIPEs obtained with different aqueous phase volume fraction.Figure 9
Void diameter distributions of poly-Pickering-HIPEs obtained with VER-St as organic phase and varied aqueous phase volume fraction. From front to back: SV20-80, SV20-90, and SV20-95.Figure 10
Effect of aqueous phase volume fraction on the elastic modulus of the poly-Pickering-HIPEs.


## 4. Conclusions

In this study, using VER as organic phase, poly-Pickering-HIPEs having internal phase volume fraction up to 95 vol% were prepared. Compared to the poly-Pickering-HIPEs with DVB as crosslinker, VEO as crosslinker is conducive to the enhancement of bothE and toughness of the poly-Pickering-HIPEs. The elastic modulus of these poly-Pickering-HIPEs was increased by increasing the VEO concentration in the organic phase, while decreased by increasing aqueous phase volume fraction. Increasing VEO concentration in the organic phase resulted in a decrease in the average void diameter and a narrow void diameter distribution of the resulting poly-Pickering-HIPEs. In addition, there were many small pores in the voids surface caused by volume contraction of VER during the polymerization, which highlights an opportunity for poly-Pickering-HIPEs to possess hierarchical structures without any additive agent.



---

*Source: 307496-2012-05-14.xml*