# Antiresistin Neutralizing Antibody Alleviates Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiac Injury in Mice

Authors: Yewen Hu; Jian Wang; Weiping Du; Nan Wu; Shuangshuang Wang; Chaoxia Zhang; Xiaomin Chen; Caijie Shen
Journal: Disease Markers
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Background. Resistin is closely related to cardiovascular diseases, and this study is aimed at examining the role of resistin in doxorubicin- (DOX-) induced cardiac injury. Methods. First, 48 mice were divided into 2 groups and treated with saline or DOX, and the expression of resistin at different time points was examined (N=24). A total of 40 mice were pretreated with the antiresistin neutralizing antibody (nAb) or isotype IgG for 1 hour and further administered DOX or saline for 5 days. The mice were divided into 4 groups: saline-IgG, saline-nAb, DOX-IgG, and DOX-nAb (N=10). Cardiac injury, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, inflammatory factors, and the biomarkers of M1 and M2 macrophages in each group were analyzed. Result. DOX administration increased the expression of resistin. DOX treatment exacerbated the loss of body and heart weight and cardiac vacuolation in mice. The antiresistin nAb reversed these conditions, downregulated the expression of myocardial injury markers, and decreased apoptosis. In addition, the antiresistin nAb decreased p65 pathway activation, decreased M1 macrophage differentiation and the expression of related inflammatory factors, and increased M2 macrophage differentiation and the expression of related inflammatory factors. Conclusion. The antiresistin nAb protected against DOX-induced cardiac injury by reducing cardiac inflammation and may be a promising target to relieve DOX-related cardiac injury.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Doxorubicin (DOX) is an anthracycline antibiotic isolated from Streptomyces and is one of the most common chemotherapeutic drugs for many cancers [1, 2]. However, the dose-dependent toxic effects on cardiomyocytes induce cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure (CHF) [3]. Research methodologies and discoveries have largely improved over the years, and the mechanisms of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity seem to be multifarious; in particular, inflammation plays an important role.Resistin, which is a polypeptide associated with type 2 diabetes [4], was named for its effect of causing insulin resistance and inducing secondary elevated blood glucose levels in diabetic patients [5, 6]. Resistin is a 12.5 kD protein that is rich in cysteine and is mainly produced by activated white blood cells or adipose tissue. Previous studies have shown that circulating concentrations of resistin are elevated in patients with diabetes and obesity and are associated with CVD [4]. Besides, human serum resistin is increased significantly in women with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy at 3 months and remains high at 6 months in those with subsequent cardiotoxicity, which means resistin may participate in cardiac injury induced by anthracycline-containing medicine [7]. Resistin is a proinflammatory marker that participates in atherosclerosis [8], hypertension [9], heart failure [10], and coronary heart disease [11]. Overexpression of resistin also promotes myocardial dysfunction in rats [12]. However, whether resistin participates in DOX-induced cardiac injury in mice has rarely been studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of resistin in DOX-induced cardiac injury in mice and investigate the possible molecular mechanism.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Animals and Treatment

Wild-type male mice (C57BL/6J) were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology and maintained in a temperature-controlled animal vivarium with adequate food and water. Antiresistin neutralizing antibody (nAb) is purchased from Merck Millipore. Isotype IgG is purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. First, 48 mice were divided into 2 groups: the DOX and the saline group; the DOX group was administered 15 mg/kg DOX by a single intraperitoneal injection, and the other group was administered saline as a control (N=24). Then, every other day, we harvested 4 mice from each group to obtain cardiac and serum resistin levels. In addition, another 40 mice were divided into 4 groups: saline-IgG, saline-nAb, DOX-IgG, and DOX-nAb (N=10). The saline-nAb group and the DOX-nAb group were pretreated with 200 μg of mouse antiresistin nAb while the same dose of isotype IgG for the saline-IgG and DOX-IgG groups. After one hour, the mice were treated with 15 mg/kg DOX or saline by a single intraperitoneal injection (N=10). All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Ningbo First Hospital (Approval No. 2021DC2408).


### 2.2. Cardiac Function Analysis

To determine cardiac function in each group, ultrasound echocardiography was performed by using a Vevo 2100 Imaging System for ultrasound imaging. The mice were anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane, and the heart rate was maintained at ~450 to 550 beats/min. We examined the heart data in the short-axis view at the papillary muscle level and examined the mid ventricle by an M-mode echocardiogram. Cardiac function data included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), and left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD). In addition, the maximum drop rate of pressure in the left ventricle, the -diastolic pressure/diastolic time (-DP/DTmax), and the +DP/DTmax was determined to estimate myocardial relaxation.


### 2.3. Biomarkers of Cardiac Function and the Expression of Resistin

The blood samples were separated and centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min to collect the supernatant as the serum. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), resistin, and creatine phosphokinase-MB (CK-MB) using a mouse-specific ELISA kit (Neo-Bioscience, China). These assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.


### 2.4. Western Blotting

Isolated LV tissue was homogenized in whole-cell lysis buffer (#9803 Cell Signaling Technology) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche). Protein lysates (40μg) were separated by SDS–PAGE (8-12%) and transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad). The antibodies used (1 : 1000 dilution) were phospho-P65 (#3031), P65 (#8242), cleaved-caspase3 (C-caspase3) (#9662), B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) (#3498), Bcl-2-associated X (BAX) (#14796), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (#5174). Protein loading was quantitated by densitometric analysis and verified against the density of GAPDH.


### 2.5. Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from LV tissue using TRIzol reagent and reverse transcribed into cDNA using a Prime Script RT Reagent Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT–qPCR was performed with a CFX96™ Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA) using SYBR Green (SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ II; TaKaRa) for fluorescence quantification. In this study, the mRNA expression of tumor necrosis factorα (TNF-α), IL-1β, IL-6, monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), IL-4, IL-10, CD80, CD86, CD206, CD163, arginase-1 (Arg-1), resistin, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) was measured. Relative mRNA expression levels were calculated using the 2∆∆Ct method. The mean value of each transcript was normalized to GAPDH. The primers used in the experiments are listed in Table 1.Table 1
RT-qPCR primer sequence.
GeneForwardReverseIL-1βTGCCACCTTTTGACAGTGATGATACTGCCTGCCTGAAGCTCTNF-αTGATCCGCGACGTGGAAACCGCCTGGAGTTCTGGAAMCP-1CAGGTCCCTGTCATGCTTCTGTGGGGCGTTAACTGCATCTIL-6GAGGATACCACTCCCAACAGACCAAGTGCATCATCGTTGTTCATACAArg-1CTTAACAGGCGTTGCCTTGGGCCACACAGTGGTGAAGAGACD163TTTGTCAACTTGAGTCCCTTCACTCCCGCTACACTCGTTTTCACCD80GGCCTGAAGAAGCATTAGCTGGAGGCTTCACCTAGAGAACCGCD86TGTTGGCCTATCTGCTCTCAGCTCACTCGGGCTTATGCD206TGTGCCTATCTCTCCAACCTCTCTGCTTCGTGCCATiNOSTGACGCTCGGAACTGTAGCACAGTGATGGCCGACCTGATResistinCCAGCTGCAATGAAGAACACCCGCTGTCCAGTCTATGCTTIL-4GCTGAACATCCTCACAACGACGCCTAAGCTCAATTCCAACIL-10CCTTGTCGGAAATGATCCAGCGCAGGGTCTTCAGCTTCTGAPDHGGTTGTCTCCTGCGACTTCATGGTCCAGGGTTTCTTACTCC


### 2.6. Histological Staining

To assess cardiac apoptosis and the polarization of macrophages, sections (5μm) were cut from heart tissue and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Apoptosis was determined using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) staining (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute). Furthermore, immunohistochemical staining was performed using anti-CD86 and anti-CD206 antibodies (Abcam) to examine M1 macrophages and M2 macrophages in the heart. Images were acquired with a fluorescence microscope (DX51, Olympus).


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

The data are presented asmean±SD. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA with the Student-Newman–Keuls post hoc analysis. A p value less than 0.05 (p<0.05) was considered statistically significant.


## 2.1. Animals and Treatment

Wild-type male mice (C57BL/6J) were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology and maintained in a temperature-controlled animal vivarium with adequate food and water. Antiresistin neutralizing antibody (nAb) is purchased from Merck Millipore. Isotype IgG is purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. First, 48 mice were divided into 2 groups: the DOX and the saline group; the DOX group was administered 15 mg/kg DOX by a single intraperitoneal injection, and the other group was administered saline as a control (N=24). Then, every other day, we harvested 4 mice from each group to obtain cardiac and serum resistin levels. In addition, another 40 mice were divided into 4 groups: saline-IgG, saline-nAb, DOX-IgG, and DOX-nAb (N=10). The saline-nAb group and the DOX-nAb group were pretreated with 200 μg of mouse antiresistin nAb while the same dose of isotype IgG for the saline-IgG and DOX-IgG groups. After one hour, the mice were treated with 15 mg/kg DOX or saline by a single intraperitoneal injection (N=10). All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Ningbo First Hospital (Approval No. 2021DC2408).


## 2.2. Cardiac Function Analysis

To determine cardiac function in each group, ultrasound echocardiography was performed by using a Vevo 2100 Imaging System for ultrasound imaging. The mice were anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane, and the heart rate was maintained at ~450 to 550 beats/min. We examined the heart data in the short-axis view at the papillary muscle level and examined the mid ventricle by an M-mode echocardiogram. Cardiac function data included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), and left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD). In addition, the maximum drop rate of pressure in the left ventricle, the -diastolic pressure/diastolic time (-DP/DTmax), and the +DP/DTmax was determined to estimate myocardial relaxation.


## 2.3. Biomarkers of Cardiac Function and the Expression of Resistin

The blood samples were separated and centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min to collect the supernatant as the serum. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), resistin, and creatine phosphokinase-MB (CK-MB) using a mouse-specific ELISA kit (Neo-Bioscience, China). These assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.


## 2.4. Western Blotting

Isolated LV tissue was homogenized in whole-cell lysis buffer (#9803 Cell Signaling Technology) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche). Protein lysates (40μg) were separated by SDS–PAGE (8-12%) and transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad). The antibodies used (1 : 1000 dilution) were phospho-P65 (#3031), P65 (#8242), cleaved-caspase3 (C-caspase3) (#9662), B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) (#3498), Bcl-2-associated X (BAX) (#14796), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (#5174). Protein loading was quantitated by densitometric analysis and verified against the density of GAPDH.


## 2.5. Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from LV tissue using TRIzol reagent and reverse transcribed into cDNA using a Prime Script RT Reagent Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT–qPCR was performed with a CFX96™ Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA) using SYBR Green (SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ II; TaKaRa) for fluorescence quantification. In this study, the mRNA expression of tumor necrosis factorα (TNF-α), IL-1β, IL-6, monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), IL-4, IL-10, CD80, CD86, CD206, CD163, arginase-1 (Arg-1), resistin, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) was measured. Relative mRNA expression levels were calculated using the 2∆∆Ct method. The mean value of each transcript was normalized to GAPDH. The primers used in the experiments are listed in Table 1.Table 1
RT-qPCR primer sequence.
GeneForwardReverseIL-1βTGCCACCTTTTGACAGTGATGATACTGCCTGCCTGAAGCTCTNF-αTGATCCGCGACGTGGAAACCGCCTGGAGTTCTGGAAMCP-1CAGGTCCCTGTCATGCTTCTGTGGGGCGTTAACTGCATCTIL-6GAGGATACCACTCCCAACAGACCAAGTGCATCATCGTTGTTCATACAArg-1CTTAACAGGCGTTGCCTTGGGCCACACAGTGGTGAAGAGACD163TTTGTCAACTTGAGTCCCTTCACTCCCGCTACACTCGTTTTCACCD80GGCCTGAAGAAGCATTAGCTGGAGGCTTCACCTAGAGAACCGCD86TGTTGGCCTATCTGCTCTCAGCTCACTCGGGCTTATGCD206TGTGCCTATCTCTCCAACCTCTCTGCTTCGTGCCATiNOSTGACGCTCGGAACTGTAGCACAGTGATGGCCGACCTGATResistinCCAGCTGCAATGAAGAACACCCGCTGTCCAGTCTATGCTTIL-4GCTGAACATCCTCACAACGACGCCTAAGCTCAATTCCAACIL-10CCTTGTCGGAAATGATCCAGCGCAGGGTCTTCAGCTTCTGAPDHGGTTGTCTCCTGCGACTTCATGGTCCAGGGTTTCTTACTCC


## 2.6. Histological Staining

To assess cardiac apoptosis and the polarization of macrophages, sections (5μm) were cut from heart tissue and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Apoptosis was determined using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) staining (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute). Furthermore, immunohistochemical staining was performed using anti-CD86 and anti-CD206 antibodies (Abcam) to examine M1 macrophages and M2 macrophages in the heart. Images were acquired with a fluorescence microscope (DX51, Olympus).


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

The data are presented asmean±SD. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA with the Student-Newman–Keuls post hoc analysis. A p value less than 0.05 (p<0.05) was considered statistically significant.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. DOX Administration Promotes Resistin Release in Mice

The dynamic changes of resistin were detected in saline- and DOX-treated mice; the results of RT-PCR showed that cardiac resistin mRNA expression was gradually increased and at peach on day 3, then gradually decreased on day 4 and day 5 (Figure1(a)). In addition, the cardiac resistin expression levels at all time points were higher than those in the control group. The serum resistin levels exhibited similar trends as the cardiac resistin levels (Figure 1(b)).Figure 1
Impact of DOX on cardiac resistin expression. (a, b) Cardiac resistin expressions and serum resistin levels on different days in the saline and DOX groups.N=24 in each group. ∗p<0.05 vs. the saline group.
(a)(b)


### 3.2. The Antiresistin nAb Alleviates DOX-Induced Cardiac Injury and Dysfunction in Mice

Mice that were treated with DOX showed significantly increased weight loss and cardiac vacuolation (Figures2(a) and 2(c)), as well as increased serum CK-MB, cardiac CK-MB, serum LDH, and cardiac LDH levels compared with those in the saline group (p<0.05) (Figure 2(b)). However, administration of the antiresistin nAb reversed these results. Lower cardiomyocyte vacuolization percentages were obtained in the DOX-nAb group than in the DOX-IgG group (Figure 2(c)). In addition, the LVEF and LVFS were markedly lower in the DOX-IgG group than in the DOX-nAb group (Figure 3). The antiresistin nAb significantly decreased LVEDD and LVESD in DOX-treated mice. The maximum change rate of pressure in the left ventricle, −DP/DTmax, and +DP/DTmax was higher in the DOX-nAb group than in the DOX-IgG group (p<0.05).Figure 2
Impact of antiresistin nAb on DOX-induced cardiac injury and dysfunction. (a) Body weight changes on different days and the ratio of heart weight to body weight ratios in the four groups (ANOVA). (b) Serum CK-MB, serum LDH, cardiac CK-MB, and cardiac LDH levels were obtained (ANOVA). (c) HE staining and cardiomyocyte vacuolization analysis of every group (200x, ANOVA).N=10 in each group. ∗p<0.05 vs. the saline-IgG group. #p<0.05 vs. the DOX-IgG group.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 3
Echocardiographic parameters of LV function and hemodynamic data of each group.N=10 for each group (ANOVA). ∗p<0.05 vs. the saline-IgG group. #p<0.05 vs. the DOX-IgG group.


### 3.3. Antiresistin nAb Protects against DOX-Induced Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis in Mice

We examined apoptosis markers in each group by Western blotting. Cardiomyocyte apoptosis-associated proteins were markedly increased after DOX treatment, but the antiresistin nAb decreased the levels of C-caspase3 and BAX in the DOX-nAb group while increasing the level of BCL2 (Figure4(a)). Furthermore, DOX increased the number of TUNEL-positive cells, which was reduced by the antiresistin nAb (Figure 4(b)).Figure 4
Impact of antiresistin nAb on DOX-induced myocardial apoptosis. (a) Cardiac expression of C-caspase3, Bax, and Bcl2 proteins was detected in the LV tissue, and the ratios of C-caspase3 to GAPDH, Bcl2 to GAPDH, and Bcl2 to GAPDH were measured (ANOVA). (b) Cardiac TUNEL-positive cells were detected.∗p<0.05 vs. the saline-IgG group. #p<0.05 vs. the DOX-IgG group.
(a)(b)


### 3.4. The Antiresistin nAb Inhibits M1 Macrophage Differentiation and Promotes M2 Macrophage Differentiation by Inhibiting p65 Activation in DOX-Treated Mice

Immunohistochemical staining showed that the antiresistin nAb decreased cardiac CD86 and increased CD206 expression in DOX-treated mice (Figure5(a)). In addition, the cardiac levels of the M1 markers CD86, CD80, and iNOS were downregulated, whereas the levels of the M2 markers CD206, CD163, and Arg-1 were upregulated in the DOX-nAb group (Figure 5(b)). The same trends in the mRNA expression of M1 macrophage-associated inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, and MCP-1, and M2 macrophage-associated inflammatory cytokines, including IL-4 and IL-10, in the heart were measured (Figure 5(c)). We also obtained the p65 phosphorylation by Western blotting, and we found that nuclear p-p65 was increased while giving the antiresistin nAb reverses it (Figure 5(d)). It hinted that the p65 signal pathway may regulate macrophage differentiation to alleviate cardiac injury after DOX treatment.Figure 5
Impact of antiresistin nAb on DOX-induced M1 and M2 macrophage polarization. (a) Immunohistochemical staining with anti-CD86 and anti-CD206 in four groups (200x). (b) Cardiac mRNA levels of CD86, CD80, iNOS, CD206, CD163, and Arg-1 were detected in each group by RT-qPCR (ANOVA). (c) Cardiac mRNA levels of IL-4, IL-10, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, and MCP-1 were detected in each group by RT-qPCR (ANOVA). (d) Cardiac t-p65 and p-p65 proteins were detected in each group, and the ratios of p-p65 to t-p65 were analyzed (ANOVA). N=10 for each group. ∗p<0.05 vs. the saline-IgG group. #p<0.05 vs. the DOX-IgG group.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.1. DOX Administration Promotes Resistin Release in Mice

The dynamic changes of resistin were detected in saline- and DOX-treated mice; the results of RT-PCR showed that cardiac resistin mRNA expression was gradually increased and at peach on day 3, then gradually decreased on day 4 and day 5 (Figure1(a)). In addition, the cardiac resistin expression levels at all time points were higher than those in the control group. The serum resistin levels exhibited similar trends as the cardiac resistin levels (Figure 1(b)).Figure 1
Impact of DOX on cardiac resistin expression. (a, b) Cardiac resistin expressions and serum resistin levels on different days in the saline and DOX groups.N=24 in each group. ∗p<0.05 vs. the saline group.
(a)(b)


## 3.2. The Antiresistin nAb Alleviates DOX-Induced Cardiac Injury and Dysfunction in Mice

Mice that were treated with DOX showed significantly increased weight loss and cardiac vacuolation (Figures2(a) and 2(c)), as well as increased serum CK-MB, cardiac CK-MB, serum LDH, and cardiac LDH levels compared with those in the saline group (p<0.05) (Figure 2(b)). However, administration of the antiresistin nAb reversed these results. Lower cardiomyocyte vacuolization percentages were obtained in the DOX-nAb group than in the DOX-IgG group (Figure 2(c)). In addition, the LVEF and LVFS were markedly lower in the DOX-IgG group than in the DOX-nAb group (Figure 3). The antiresistin nAb significantly decreased LVEDD and LVESD in DOX-treated mice. The maximum change rate of pressure in the left ventricle, −DP/DTmax, and +DP/DTmax was higher in the DOX-nAb group than in the DOX-IgG group (p<0.05).Figure 2
Impact of antiresistin nAb on DOX-induced cardiac injury and dysfunction. (a) Body weight changes on different days and the ratio of heart weight to body weight ratios in the four groups (ANOVA). (b) Serum CK-MB, serum LDH, cardiac CK-MB, and cardiac LDH levels were obtained (ANOVA). (c) HE staining and cardiomyocyte vacuolization analysis of every group (200x, ANOVA).N=10 in each group. ∗p<0.05 vs. the saline-IgG group. #p<0.05 vs. the DOX-IgG group.
(a)(b)(c)Figure 3
Echocardiographic parameters of LV function and hemodynamic data of each group.N=10 for each group (ANOVA). ∗p<0.05 vs. the saline-IgG group. #p<0.05 vs. the DOX-IgG group.


## 3.3. Antiresistin nAb Protects against DOX-Induced Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis in Mice

We examined apoptosis markers in each group by Western blotting. Cardiomyocyte apoptosis-associated proteins were markedly increased after DOX treatment, but the antiresistin nAb decreased the levels of C-caspase3 and BAX in the DOX-nAb group while increasing the level of BCL2 (Figure4(a)). Furthermore, DOX increased the number of TUNEL-positive cells, which was reduced by the antiresistin nAb (Figure 4(b)).Figure 4
Impact of antiresistin nAb on DOX-induced myocardial apoptosis. (a) Cardiac expression of C-caspase3, Bax, and Bcl2 proteins was detected in the LV tissue, and the ratios of C-caspase3 to GAPDH, Bcl2 to GAPDH, and Bcl2 to GAPDH were measured (ANOVA). (b) Cardiac TUNEL-positive cells were detected.∗p<0.05 vs. the saline-IgG group. #p<0.05 vs. the DOX-IgG group.
(a)(b)


## 3.4. The Antiresistin nAb Inhibits M1 Macrophage Differentiation and Promotes M2 Macrophage Differentiation by Inhibiting p65 Activation in DOX-Treated Mice

Immunohistochemical staining showed that the antiresistin nAb decreased cardiac CD86 and increased CD206 expression in DOX-treated mice (Figure5(a)). In addition, the cardiac levels of the M1 markers CD86, CD80, and iNOS were downregulated, whereas the levels of the M2 markers CD206, CD163, and Arg-1 were upregulated in the DOX-nAb group (Figure 5(b)). The same trends in the mRNA expression of M1 macrophage-associated inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, and MCP-1, and M2 macrophage-associated inflammatory cytokines, including IL-4 and IL-10, in the heart were measured (Figure 5(c)). We also obtained the p65 phosphorylation by Western blotting, and we found that nuclear p-p65 was increased while giving the antiresistin nAb reverses it (Figure 5(d)). It hinted that the p65 signal pathway may regulate macrophage differentiation to alleviate cardiac injury after DOX treatment.Figure 5
Impact of antiresistin nAb on DOX-induced M1 and M2 macrophage polarization. (a) Immunohistochemical staining with anti-CD86 and anti-CD206 in four groups (200x). (b) Cardiac mRNA levels of CD86, CD80, iNOS, CD206, CD163, and Arg-1 were detected in each group by RT-qPCR (ANOVA). (c) Cardiac mRNA levels of IL-4, IL-10, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, and MCP-1 were detected in each group by RT-qPCR (ANOVA). (d) Cardiac t-p65 and p-p65 proteins were detected in each group, and the ratios of p-p65 to t-p65 were analyzed (ANOVA). N=10 for each group. ∗p<0.05 vs. the saline-IgG group. #p<0.05 vs. the DOX-IgG group.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 4. Discussion

Numerous studies have demonstrated that resistin participates in insulin resistance, diabetes, and CVD [6, 13, 14]. In patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), a higher level of resistin was associated with worsened endothelial function and an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events [13]. Increased circulating resistin in patients with nonischemic dilated (DCM) and inflammatory (DCMi) cardiomyopathy resulted in hypertrophic myocardial remodeling and reduced the indices of ventricular function [10]. However, the role of resistin in the pathogenesis of DOX-induced cardiac injury is still unclear. This study is aimed at revealing the connection between resistin and DOX-induced cardiotoxicity and evaluating resistin as a contributing factor that exacerbates myocardial apoptosis and hypertrophy through inflammatory effects.We found that DOX administration increased the levels of resistin and that an antiresistin nAb alleviated cardiac dysfunction, the inflammatory response, and cell apoptosis. In our study, the effect of resistin on macrophage differentiation was mediated by the p65 signaling pathway. The activation of the p65 protein is closely associated with neuroinflammation [15], atherosclerosis [16], and other inflammatory diseases [17]. The p65 signaling pathway is the main pathological mechanism of inflammatory diseases and stimulates proinflammatory macrophage activation [18]. The antiresistin nAb inhibited p65 activation and suppressed the differentiation of M1 macrophages, ultimately alleviating cardiac inflammation and injury.In addition, there were other potential mechanisms that might elucidate this pronounced effect of resistin on DOX-induced cardiotoxicity in mice. Oxidative stress [19], inflammation, and cardiomyocyte apoptosis participate in DOX-induced cardiac injury.Oxidative stress is associated with mitochondrion dysfunction [20]. Cardiomyocytes have more mitochondria than cells in other organs [19], which might be the reason why the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cardiac cells occurs and results in cardiac injury. After DOX treatment, a large amount of ROS was produced and impaired adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis. Mitochondria are the main source of ROS, and ROS-producing enzymes transform DOX to semiquinone, which easily reacts with oxygen to produce superoxide anions (O2-), which can increase the levels of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) via superoxide dismutase [21]. H2O2 and O2- can create toxic hydroxyl radicals (OH-) via the Fenton reaction due to an iron imbalance, resulting in cardiac cell death.In addition, NO also plays a vital role in DOX-induced oxidative stress. DOX binds to the reductase domain of endothelial NOS (eNOS), leading to increased cardiac NO synthesis, which is catalyzed by eNOS and iNOS. Resistin downregulated the expression of eNOS and upregulated iNOS, thereby promoting the formation of NO in vivo [12, 21]. Moreover, cardiomyocytes overexpressing resistin produced high levels of TNF-α to activate the phosphorylation of IκBα, inducing a large amount of intracellular ROS in rats [12]. Oxidative stress induced by long-term resistin caused cell apoptosis and myocardial dysfunction and remodeling in vitro. These results suggested that resistin could synergistically enhance DOX-induced oxidative stress and contribute to cardiotoxicity.The switch in macrophage phenotype recapitulated key features of inflammation [22]. We measured the expression of macrophage-related inflammatory genes in heart tissue, and the results suggested that the antiresistin nAb inhibited M1 macrophage differentiation and the associated cardiac inflammatory response in mice. In addition, the antiresistin nAb also increased M2 macrophages and the expression of related inflammatory cytokines.Overall, the neutralization of resistin inhibited M1 macrophage-induced inflammation by inhibiting the p65 signaling pathway in DOX-treated mice, reducing cardiac dysfunction, inflammation, and cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Due to life-threatening cardiotoxicity during and after therapy in cancer patients, antiresistin therapy may play a role in clinical strategies.



---

*Source: 3040521-2022-12-13.xml*