# Occurrence of Interspecific Mating between Two Species ofDanaus Kluk, 1780 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Nature

Authors: Sarika Baidya; Dipendra Nath Basu; Souparno Roy; Arjan Basu Roy
Journal: Psyche
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Mating across species occurs rarely in nature, which contends prevalent idea of biological species concept. Throughout species range, mating pattern varies and reproductive barriers are also not fixed among different species. In this study, two instances of interspecific mating between two widely common Nymphalid Tiger butterflies (DanausKluk, 1780) in Indian region are reported. Observations imply lack of absolute reproductive barriers, where possible interplay exists among prezygotic and postzygotic isolating factors compensating each other in order to restrain interspecific hybridization.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Biological species concept [1] is a widely accepted hypothesis prevailing evolutionary ideas regarding species and speciation in the last century. It delineates species as a population of interbreeding individuals restrained from mating with other such populations [1, 2]. This concept is profoundly based on the absolute reproductive isolation between two species. Natural history and behavioral insights divide reproductive barriers into prezygotic and postzygotic isolating factors [2]. Effectiveness of these factors varies quiet a lot as barriers among different organisms [3–5]. Some of these barriers are not very effective in maintaining reproductive isolation between two species resulting in interspecific hybridization.Natural history records are bringing forth instances of interspecific mating, but it is considered to be a rare and stochastic phenomenon in nature. These evidences reveal presence of leaky reproductive barrier, contesting the idea of absolute isolation. Biological species concept does not support the idea of viable hybrid species, but there are a few examples of hybrid species populations in nature [6]. In different organisms, interspecific hybridization is an instrumental factor for speciation and thus has immense evolutionary significance [7–9].Moths and butterflies also have been found to have interspecific pairings. Apart from the artificially induced interspecific crosses [10–12], naturalists reported interspecific, intergeneric, and interfamilial mating in different groups of Lepidopteran insects [3, 12–16]. Interspecific pairings have been reported in Nymphalid [17–19], Lycaenid [20], Pierid [21], and Papilionid [6, 13, 14, 22] butterflies. Preceding studies on mating patterns suggested successful artificial hybridization [10, 11, 23–25] and 6% chances of natural interspecific mating in butterfly genusPapilioLinnaeus, 1758 [26]. Overall frequency estimation of interspecific mating has been doubled from 0.7% to 1.5% in North American butterflies over 50 years [3, 20]. Sometimes, chemical cues also induced such cross-specific mating [27].There are multiple conjectures of congeneric hybridizations in Papilionid and Lycaenid butterflies proposed by earlier taxonomists working on Indian butterflies [28, 29]. Occurrence of intergeneric pairing in different Lycaenid butterflies has been reported in recent years [15, 30]. We are not aware of any recent report on interspecific mating in Indian Nymphalid butterflies. In this article, we report for the first time occurrence of interspecific mating between twoDanaus butterfly species in nature:D. chrysippus (Linnaeus, 1758) andD. genutia (Cramer, 1779).


## 2. Materials and Methods

We observed two instances of interspecific mating betweenDanaus chrysippus andD. genutia in Eco Tourism Park butterfly garden in Kolkata (Figure 1). Photographs were taken with Nikon P510 camera and GPS of the location was recorded during the observation.Figure 1
Location and surrounding habitat of intraspecific mating. (a) Location of Eco Park in West Bengal, India. (b) On the map, the red and yellow spots show the GPS taken for the observation of two occurrences(map courtesy: Google Earth, Google LLC.). (c) Habitat of butterfly garden and presence of butterfly host plants and nectar plants.
(a) (b) (c)After mating, individuals were provided with their host plants and nectar plants inside a rearing cage making an artificial habitat for them. Females were kept in the enclosure with proximity of host plant to induce them for laying eggs. Eggs were subsequently reared in the standard manner.In order to see the extent of lock and key mechanism playing role in interspecies mating, theD. chrysippus andD. genutia males have been dissected for ideal genitalia morphology in these two species. To check probable variation in external genitalia morphology between parents and offspring of this interspecific pairing, if any, we have dissected the male and female offspring reared out of the brood resulting from interspecific mating. Both of the male and female genitalia have been dissected with 10% KOH. Photographs of genitalia were taken in Leica microscope and stacked multiple focal plane in CombineZM [31] to acquire better depth of field. Dissected materials have been preserved in glycerol.


## 3. Result

The first instance was observed and photographed on 19 April 2015 inside Eco Tourism Park butterfly garden, Kolkata (22.607°N, 88.465°E) (Figure1(b)) at 15:15 hrs., where a maleD. genutia was found to mate with a femaleD. chrysippus in flight for approximately fifteen minutes and then they settled down on axillary tendril ofPassiflora foetidaLinnaeus (Figure 2(a)). There, they continued the mating till 17:06 hrs. and surprisingly after that the male died before withdrawal of its copulatory organ from the body of female individual. We collected the mating pair and brought them in our laboratory, where we detached the mating pair and observed the femaleD. chrysippus in insect rearing cage providingCalotropis gigantea(Linnaeus) Dryand. as host plant andLantana camara Linnaeus as nectaring plant. The female survived normally and laid 54 eggs on 20 April from 9:08 hrs. to 12:50 hrs. but none of the eggs hatched. The female died on 21 April 2015.Figure 2
Interspecific mating inD. chrysippus andD. genutia.(a) First occurrence in 2015 and (b) second instance in 2016.
(a) (b)The second instance of mating was recorded on 26 May 2016 in Eco Tourism Park butterfly garden, Kolkata (22.608°N, 88.465°E) (Figure1(b)) at 16:10 hrs., where, like the previous occurrence, the male individual wasD. genutia and the female wasD. chrysippus. The mating continued for 50 minutes on the leaf ofTrema orientalis (Linnaeus) Blume (Figure 2(b)) after which the pair was observed further in an insect-rearing cage providing artificial habitat as the above. Both of the butterflies survived as usual but, on the next day, the male died at 11:00 hrs. On the same day, the female laid 14 eggs on the bud ofCalotropis gigantea(Linnaeus) Dryand. between 14:30 hrs. and 14:55 hrs. and it died on 29 May. 12 of the laid eggs hatched on 30 May and the remaining two eggs hatched on the next day. All the hatched caterpillars survived and completed their moulting to 5th instar. The larval stage and pupal stage continued for eight days and seven days, respectively. Only 4 individuals emerged successfully and appeared to beD. chrysippus, among which two were males and two were females. One male and one female were marked, released in nature, and observed for 10 days. The genitalia of the remaining two butterflies along with the mating pair were dissected under dissection microscope and observed.External male genitalia morphology in both species is distinguishable by the overall structure of genital capsule, shape of clasp, and aedeagus. InD. chrysippusvalves are broad and heavily sclerotized, with distal processes bent ventrally, and fused with vinculum and tegumen (Figure 3 i(a)). Additionally, the aedeagus has two sclerotized, serrated processes at the distal part near cornuti (Figure 3 i(b)). Contrarily, inD. genutia valves are short, downwardly curved, and fused ventrally with vinculum and the part of tegumen is broader than the other species (Figure 3 iii(a)). In aedeagus, there are two rows of dentation at the distal part but sclerotized process is absent (Figure 3 iii(b)). Everted vesica shows distinct dentation pattern in both species. While comparing genitalia morphology of male offspring from second instance with idealD. chrysippus male genitalia, checking probable variation if any, we found no differences,except a slight variation in the dentation of the distal sclerotized process on aedeagus (Figure 3 ii(b)). Genitalia of female offspring shows no such variation (Figure 3 iv(a, b)).Figure 3
Genitalia morphology. Male genitalia ofD. chrysippus: i(a) lateral view of genital capsule, i(b) aedeagus; male genitalia of offspring from second instance: ii(a) lateral view of genital capsule, ii(b) aedeagus; male genitalia ofD. genutia: iii(a) lateral view of genital capsule, iii(b) aedeagus; genitalia of female offspring which is similar toD. chrysippus: iv(a) dorsal view and iv(b) lateral view.


## 4. Discussion

Danaus chrysippus andD. genutiaare closely related species and are widely overlapping in spatial distribution throughout southern to southeastern Asia and Australia [32]. To prevent interspecific genetic exchange, where two species overlap spatially and temporally, selection should impose drastic variability in the reproductive barriers, ensuring incompatibility between species populations. To the contrary, we see two events of interspecific pairing within a couple of years between these twoDanaus species, indicating lack of absolute reproductive barriers.From a perspective of sexual selection, in butterflies, females are the choosy sex imposing selection on the males. As we have seen in both cases, the mating pairs were maleD. genutia and femaleD. chrysippus; there lies possibility of relaxed mate preference in females (which may be individualistic) ofD. chrysippusor the cues (namely, visual, chemical, and tactile) for mate selection overlap significantly in these two species. On the other hand, components of genitalia in femaleD. chrysippus may not be functionally selective for different genitalia structures in males of both species, resulting in interspecific pairing.External male genitalia morphology has been treated as a proxy for prezygotic barrier. According to “lock and key” hypothesis, male and female genitalia are compatible within a species but incompatible between species [33]. But there are no profound empirical findings on the functional role of key components of genitalia. Several studies showed intraspecific variation in such characters [34–36]. This clearly represents lack of an ideal lock and key mechanism and raises questions about its significance in maintaining reproductive isolation. As we compared genitalia of offspring andD. chrysippus, we found very minor variation which may be intrapopulation variation inD. chrysippus.In interspecific pairing, often it has been noticed that transfer of spermatheca does not occur. But in our scenario, spermatheca was present in female after mating. Insects including butterflies have another line of prezygotic barrier by means of females’ ability to choose from multiple spermathecae present in bursa copulatrix [37]. As we have seen that, in the second occurrence, the offspring wereD. chrysippus like their female parent, this may imply that the female was mated earlier withD. chrysippusmale and chose that spermathecae over the spermatheca be transferred by the maleD. genutia.In the first scenario, the mated female laid eggs but none hatched; this may be because either female laid unfertilized eggs without utilizing the spermatheca or postzygotic barrier played key role, where zygote lacked homologous pairing of chromosomal entities and led to nonviability.Therefore, inDanaus butterflies, ideal lock and key mechanism may not be present but other factors like selective spermatheca usage by females and postzygotic barrier play key role in restraining gene flow between two species.



---

*Source: 3059017-2018-04-01.xml*