# Design and Steady-State Performance of a Novel Winding Type Permanent Magnet Coupling with Slip Power Recovery Function

Authors: Lei Xia; Haobin Jiang
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

A novel winding type permanent magnet coupling (WTPMC) is proposed to work as an adjustable speed drive with slip power recovery function. As a kind of dual-mechanical-port electric machine with radial-flux configuration, the WTPMC consists of an outer rotor embedded with three-phase windings, an inner rotor populated with permanent magnets, and a slip power recovery circuit comprising a rectifier, a boost converter, and an ultracapacitor. The working principle of the WTPMC is presented, and its mathematical model is derived. To develop a WTPMC prototype for automotive applications, two-dimensional (2D) finite element analysis (FEA) is conducted using Ansoft Maxwell software to study the steady-state (constant slip speed) performance. For the experimental validation, the WTPMC prototype is manufactured and tested on a test bench. To show the accuracy of the 2D FEA, the computed results are compared with those obtained from experimental measurements. It is shown that the agreement between the 2D FEA and experimental results is good. Moreover, the WTPMC prototype can operate in the output speed range under different load torque conditions. The slip power recovery efficiency for the 2D FEA is 66.7%, while, for experimental measurements, it is 57.2%.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Magnetic couplings have been widely employed in various industrial applications that require power transmission with no mechanical connection. They can transmit torque through an air gap between two rotors that are, respectively, attached to the prime mover and the load. There are mainly three types of magnetic couplings, namely, electromagnetic coupling [1, 2], permanent magnet synchronous coupling [3–9], and permanent magnet eddy current coupling [10–16]. These types of magnetic couplings have both axial-flux or radial-flux configurations.The electromagnetic coupling and permanent magnet eddy current coupling can be used as adjustable speed drives, since their torque generation is based on the relative motion between one rotor generating a magnetic field and another rotor acting as a conductive part. By now, some corporations, like MagnaDrive, Frings Auerbach, and Sandvik, have developed related products and put them into the market. However, these couplings have their own disadvantages. For electromagnetic couplings, the magnetic field is created using a winding system and can be regulated by varying the exciting current. The disadvantage lies in that it requires an electrical supply system and consumes considerable energy during operation. For permanent magnet eddy current couplings, the magnetic field is produced by permanent magnets, thus eliminating the electrical supply system. In this case, the magnetic field can be regulated by varying the air gap length for axial-flux configuration or by adjusting the overlapping area between two rotors for radial-flux configuration. Nevertheless, in practical applications, it becomes difficult for mostly used axial-flux couplings to realize the millimeter-level precision of air gap adjustment via a mechanism. Moreover, due to the induction of eddy current in the conductive rotor, the slip power, that is the power difference between input and output terminals, is dissipated as heat and can not be recovered. This will significantly decrease the coupling’s efficiency under large-slip conditions. Therefore, the normal working range of permanent magnet eddy current couplings corresponds to low slip values. Note that it is promising to develop a type of magnetic coupling which can also work efficiently under large-slip conditions, and one of the feasible ways is trying to recover the slip power.The design and analysis of magnetic couplings can be achieved with the numerical or analytical methods. Numerical approaches, such as finite element analysis (FEA), can give accurate results considering the material nonlinearity and geometric details [17]. However, magnetic coupling is an inherent three-dimensional (3D) geometry from the modeling point of view, which takes long computation time for FEA. In order to simplify the analysis, the 3D problem can be reduced to a two-dimensional (2D) one by introducing a cutting plane for creating the cross section. Note that it becomes necessary to verify the accuracy of the 2D FEA by comparing with experimental or analytical approaches.Inspired by the above discussion, this paper proposes a novel winding type permanent magnet coupling (WTPMC), which can work as an adjustable speed drive with slip power recovery function. The structure and working principle of the WTPMC are presented. Based on the working principle, its mathematical model is derived. In order to develop a WTPMC prototype for automotive applications, the 2D FEA is conducted using Ansoft Maxwell software to study the steady-state (constant slip speed) performance. For the experimental validation, the WTPMC prototype is manufactured and tested on a test bench. The results computed with the 2D FEA are compared with those obtained from experimental measurements.


## 2. Design of WTPMC

The schematic of the proposed WTPMC is illustrated in Figure1. It is basically composed of three components: (1) an outer rotor that is embedded with three-phase windings and attached to the input shaft; (2) an inner rotor that is populated with permanent magnets and attached to the output shaft; (3) a slip power recovery circuit comprising a diode bridge rectifier, a boost converter based on insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT), an ultracapacitor, and an electronic control unit (ECU). Note that the outer and inner rotors are usually called the rotor assembly. Moreover, the three-phase windings are connected to the slip power recovery circuit via slip rings. The permanent magnets are radially magnetized, as indicated by arrows on them. In general, the WTPMC can be regarded as a kind of dual-mechanical-port electric machine with radial-flux configuration.Figure 1
Schematic of WTPMC.The working principle of the WTPMC is as follows. When the prime mover drives the input shaft and outer rotor to rotate, the relative motion between outer and inner rotors induces alternating current (AC) in the three-phase windings under the excitation of magnetic field produced by permanent magnets. The induced AC then interacts with the magnetic field to produce an electromagnetic torque against the load, which drives the inner rotor to rotate at a speed lower than the outer rotor speed. Note that the inner rotor speed is regarded as the output speed of the WTPMC. Moreover, the induced AC is transformed into direct current (DC) through the rectifier, and the boost converter is assumed to operate in continuous conduction mode (CCM). In order to work as an adjustable speed drive, the ECU regulates the duty cycle of the IGBT to change the DC in the circuit, so as to further control the electromagnetic torque and output speed of the WTPMC. In addition, in order to achieve slip power recovery function, the DC charges the ultracapacitor when the IGBT is turned OFF during the operation of the boost converter.


## 3. Mathematical Modeling

Based on the working principle, the mathematical model of the WTPMC is derived.The equivalent circuits of slip power recovery when the IGBT is turned ON or OFF are shown in Figure2, respectively. The parameters are as follows:U represents the effective back-electromotive force (EMF);i denotes the circuit current; Lw and Rw are the equivalent inductance and resistance of the three-phase windings, respectively; Lbc denotes the inductance of the boost converter’s inductor;Uc represents the terminal voltage of the ultracapacitor.Figure 2
Equivalent circuit of slip power recovery.
(a)
When IGBT is ON
(b)
When IGBT is OFFThe effective back-EMF is proportional to the slip speedΩ that is the speed difference between outer and inner rotors, which can be expressed as(1)U=keΩ=keΩ1-Ω2,whereke is the back-EMF coefficient. Ω1 and Ω2 denote the outer rotor speed and inner rotor speed, respectively.(i) When the IGBT is turned ON, the circuit relations meet the following equations:(2)U=Lw+Lbci˙+Rwi,CU˙c=0.(ii) When the IGBT is turned OFF, we can get(3)U=Lw+Lbci˙+Rwi+Uc,CU˙c=i,whereC is the rated capacity of the ultracapacitor.Combining (2)-(3) and using the averaging method, we have(4)U=Lw+Lbci˙+Rwi+1-DUc,CU˙c=1-Di,whereD is the duty cycle of the IGBT.Moreover, the electromagnetic torqueTe is proportional to the circuit current, which can be written as(5)Te=kTi,wherekT denotes the electromagnetic torque coefficient.The motion equations for outer and inner rotors are given by(6)J1Ω˙1+B1Ω1=Tpm-Te,J2Ω˙2+B2Ω2=Te-Tl,whereJ1 andB1 are the moment of inertia and viscous damping coefficient of the outer rotor, respectively.J2 andB2 are the moment of inertia and viscous damping coefficient of the inner rotor, respectively. Tpm denotes the prime mover torque, andTl represents the load torque.In addition, the power recovered by the ultracapacitorP can be obtained as(7)P=CUc22-Uc122Δt,whereUc1 andUc2 represent the initial and final terminal voltage of the ultracapacitor, respectively. Δt denotes the time duration.


## 4. FEA Approach

To develop a WTPMC prototype for automotive applications, its 2D FEA is conducted using Ansoft Maxwell software.Table1 gives the design requirements for the WTPMC prototype. Note that the outer rotor speed is 500 r/min and the inner rotor speed range is 100–400 r/min, which means that the maximum slip speed is 400 r/min that corresponds to a slip rate of 80%. Under the steady-state condition, the constant slip speed corresponds to constant inner rotor speed, which means that the electromagnetic torque nearly equals the load torque. Table 1 shows that the maximum load torque is 40 N·m. In this case, the maximum input power is 2.094 kW, and the maximum output power can be up to 1.675 kW with the inner rotor speed to be 400 r/min.Table 1
Design requirements.
Parameter
Value
Outer rotor speed (r/min)
500
Inner rotor speed range (r/min)
100–400
Maximum load torque (N⋅m)
40
Maximum input power (kW)
2.094
Maximum output power (kW)
1.675According to the above design requirements, a 2D geometrical model is established, as shown in Figure3. Table 2 lists its main geometrical and physical parameters. These parameters have been optimized, but the optimization procedure is not discussed in this paper. As can be seen in Figure 3, the geometrical model shows the cross section of the rotor assembly normal to the axial direction. The double layer three-phase windings are housed inside 18 slots. Moreover, there are 8 pole-pairs of permanent magnets alternating in the direction of magnetization, as indicated by arrows on them. To simulate the slip power recovery circuit, an equivalent circuit model is built in the module of Maxwell Circuit Editor, as shown in Figure 4.Table 2
Geometrical and physical parameters.
Parameter
Value
Outer radius of outer rotor (mm)
90
Inner radius of outer rotor (mm)
50
Inner radius of inner rotor (mm)
20
Axial length of rotors (mm)
100
Air gap length (mm)
1.5
Permanent magnets thickness (mm)
6
Slots number
18
Pole-pairs number
8Figure 3
2D geometrical model.Figure 4
Equivalent circuit model.Based on the geometrical model, the adaptive meshing technique is adopted to obtain a 2D finite element (FE) model, as shown in Figure5. The meshing size of outer and inner rotors, three-phase windings, and permanent magnets are 8.1 mm, 6.3 mm, and 1.8 mm, respectively. The FEA can be conducted after the preprocessing steps are done.Figure 5
2D FE model.


## 5. Experimental Approach

For the experimental validation, the WTPMC prototype is manufactured by a local corporation which specializes in permanent magnetic equipment. Figures6 and 7 show the rotor assembly with casting and the slip power recovery circuit, respectively. According to the corporation’s request, the rotor assembly without casting is not shown in this paper. Moreover, as can be seen from the bottom of Figure 7, an ultracapacitor produced by the corporation of Maxwell Technologies is used for slip power recovery with the rated capacity of 165 F and rated voltage of 48 V.Figure 6
Rotor assembly with casting.Figure 7
Slip power recovery circuit.The steady-state and dynamic performance of the WTPMC prototype is tested on a test bench, whose schematic and photograph are shown in Figures8 and 9, respectively. In addition to the WTPMC prototype, the test bench mainly consists of a three-phase induction motor, a dynamometer, two torque/speed sensors, and a control cabinet. The three-phase induction motor acts as the prime mover, and the dynamometer applies the load torque. One torque/speed sensor is set between the three-phase induction motor and the WTPMC prototype for measuring the outer rotor speed. Moreover, another torque/speed sensor is set between the WTPMC prototype and the dynamometer for measuring the inner rotor speed. The control cabinet is used to monitor and adjust the signals such as the load torque, the terminal voltage of the ultracapacitor, and the duty cycle of the IGBT.Figure 8
Schematic of test bench.Figure 9
Photograph of test bench.


## 6. Results and Discussion

In this section, we use the 2D FEA to study the steady-state (constant slip speed) performance of the developed WTPMC prototype. In order to verify the effectiveness of the 2D FEA, the computed results are compared with those obtained from experimental measurements.


### 6.1. Effective Back-EMF versus Slip Speed

Figure10 shows the effective back-EMF versus the slip speed for the WTPMC prototype. Table 3 gives the comparison of effective back-EMF. Good agreements can be observed between the 2D FEA and experimental results. It can be seen that the deviations of effective back-EMF between the 2D FEA and experimental results for each slip speed are always below 10%, except for the case of zero slip speed. Due to the remanent flux density of permanent magnets in experiments, there exists an effective back-EMF of 2 V for zero slip speed. Nevertheless, the remanent flux density of permanent magnets is not considered in the 2D FEA. Moreover, the 2D FEA and experimental results indicate the proportional relationship between effective back-EMF and slip speed, as previously described in (1). According to Table 3 and (1), the back-EMF coefficientke is approximated to be 0.086 and 0.081 for the 2D FEA and experimental results, respectively.Table 3
Comparison of effective back-EMF.
Slip speed (r/min)
Effective back-EMF (V)
2D FEA
Experimental
0
0
2
100
8.6
8
200
17.2
16.3
300
25.6
24.4
400
34.2
32.5
500
42.8
40.8Figure 10
Effective back-EMF versus slip speed.


### 6.2. Electromagnetic Torque versus Circuit Current

Figure11 shows the electromagnetic torque versus the circuit current for the WTPMC prototype. Table 4 gives the comparison of circuit current. Once again, the agreement between the 2D FEA and experimental results is good. It can be observed that the deviations of circuit current between the 2D FEA and experimental results for each electromagnetic torque are always below 10%. Moreover, the 2D FEA and experimental results indicate that the electromagnetic torque has a proportional relationship with regard to the circuit current, as previously expressed in (5). According to Table 4 and (5), the electromagnetic torque coefficientkT is approximated to be 2.02 and 1.89 for the 2D FEA and experimental results, respectively.Table 4
Comparison of circuit current.
Electromagnetic torque (N⋅m)
Circuit current (A)
2D FEA
Experimental
0
0
0
10
5
5.2
20
9.9
10.6
30
14.7
15.9
40
19.6
21.1Figure 11
Electromagnetic torque versus circuit current.


### 6.3. Performance as Adjustable Speed Drive

As an adjustable speed drive, the WTPMC prototype should have the ability to operate in the output speed range. Tables5 and 6 give the duty cycle of the IGBT with different output speed and load torque for the 2D FEA and experimental measurements, respectively. In this case, the terminal voltage of the ultracapacitor is 43 V. For ease of comparison between the 2D FEA and experimental results, the output speed versus the duty cycle of the IGBT for the load torque of 10 N·m, 20 N·m, 30 N·m, and 40 N·m is shown in Figures 12–15, respectively. Since the deviations of the duty cycle of the IGBT for each output speed are always below 20%, the agreement between the 2D FEA and experimental results is good. It is shown that the WTPMC prototype can operate in the output speed range under different load torque conditions. With the same load torque, the duty cycle of the IGBT increases linearly with the increase of output speed. Moreover, with the same output speed, the duty cycle of the IGBT increases linearly with the increase of load torque.Table 5
Duty cycle of IGBT with different output speed and load torque (2D FEA).
Duty cycle of IGBT
Load torque (N⋅m)
10
20
30
40
Output speed (r/min)
100
0.25
0.29
0.32
0.36
200
0.45
0.49
0.52
0.56
300
0.64
0.68
0.72
0.76
400
0.84
0.88
0.92
0.96Table 6
Duty cycle of IGBT with different output speed and load torque (experimental).
Duty cycle of IGBT
Load torque (N⋅m)
10
20
30
40
Output speed (r/min)
100
0.29
0.33
0.37
0.42
200
0.47
0.52
0.56
0.6
300
0.66
0.71
0.75
0.79
400
0.86
0.9
0.94
0.99Figure 12
Output speed versus duty cycle of IGBT for load torque of 10 N⋅m.Figure 13
Output speed versus duty cycle of IGBT for load torque of 20 N⋅m.Figure 14
Output speed versus duty cycle of IGBT for load torque of 30 N⋅m.Figure 15
Output speed versus duty cycle of IGBT for load torque of 40 N⋅m.


### 6.4. Slip Power Recovery Performance

The slip power recovery efficiency, which is the ratio of the power recovered by the ultracapacitor to the slip power, is selected as the crucial index to evaluate the slip power recovery performance. Figure16 demonstrates the response of the terminal voltage of the ultracapacitor, and Table 7 gives the comparison of performance indices. In this case, the slip speed is constant at 400 r/min for the load torque of 40 N·m, which corresponds to the maximum slip power of 1675 W. From Figure 16, good agreements can be observed between the 2D FEA and experimental results. Note that the initial terminal voltage of the ultracapacitor is 43 V, and the time duration is 5 s. The final terminal voltages of the ultracapacitor for the 2D FEA and experimental measurements are 43.78 V and 43.67 V, respectively. According to (7), the power recovered by the ultracapacitor can be calculated, as shown in Table 7. Furthermore, the slip power recovery efficiency is calculated to be 66.7% and 57.2% for the 2D FEA and experimental measurements, respectively.Table 7
Comparison of performance indices.
Performance indices
2D FEA
Experimental
Final terminal voltage of ultracapacitor (V)
43.78
43.67
Power recovered by ultracapacitor (W)
1116.86
958.17
Slip power recovery efficiency (%)
66.7
57.2Figure 16
Terminal voltage of ultracapacitor.


## 6.1. Effective Back-EMF versus Slip Speed

Figure10 shows the effective back-EMF versus the slip speed for the WTPMC prototype. Table 3 gives the comparison of effective back-EMF. Good agreements can be observed between the 2D FEA and experimental results. It can be seen that the deviations of effective back-EMF between the 2D FEA and experimental results for each slip speed are always below 10%, except for the case of zero slip speed. Due to the remanent flux density of permanent magnets in experiments, there exists an effective back-EMF of 2 V for zero slip speed. Nevertheless, the remanent flux density of permanent magnets is not considered in the 2D FEA. Moreover, the 2D FEA and experimental results indicate the proportional relationship between effective back-EMF and slip speed, as previously described in (1). According to Table 3 and (1), the back-EMF coefficientke is approximated to be 0.086 and 0.081 for the 2D FEA and experimental results, respectively.Table 3
Comparison of effective back-EMF.
Slip speed (r/min)
Effective back-EMF (V)
2D FEA
Experimental
0
0
2
100
8.6
8
200
17.2
16.3
300
25.6
24.4
400
34.2
32.5
500
42.8
40.8Figure 10
Effective back-EMF versus slip speed.


## 6.2. Electromagnetic Torque versus Circuit Current

Figure11 shows the electromagnetic torque versus the circuit current for the WTPMC prototype. Table 4 gives the comparison of circuit current. Once again, the agreement between the 2D FEA and experimental results is good. It can be observed that the deviations of circuit current between the 2D FEA and experimental results for each electromagnetic torque are always below 10%. Moreover, the 2D FEA and experimental results indicate that the electromagnetic torque has a proportional relationship with regard to the circuit current, as previously expressed in (5). According to Table 4 and (5), the electromagnetic torque coefficientkT is approximated to be 2.02 and 1.89 for the 2D FEA and experimental results, respectively.Table 4
Comparison of circuit current.
Electromagnetic torque (N⋅m)
Circuit current (A)
2D FEA
Experimental
0
0
0
10
5
5.2
20
9.9
10.6
30
14.7
15.9
40
19.6
21.1Figure 11
Electromagnetic torque versus circuit current.


## 6.3. Performance as Adjustable Speed Drive

As an adjustable speed drive, the WTPMC prototype should have the ability to operate in the output speed range. Tables5 and 6 give the duty cycle of the IGBT with different output speed and load torque for the 2D FEA and experimental measurements, respectively. In this case, the terminal voltage of the ultracapacitor is 43 V. For ease of comparison between the 2D FEA and experimental results, the output speed versus the duty cycle of the IGBT for the load torque of 10 N·m, 20 N·m, 30 N·m, and 40 N·m is shown in Figures 12–15, respectively. Since the deviations of the duty cycle of the IGBT for each output speed are always below 20%, the agreement between the 2D FEA and experimental results is good. It is shown that the WTPMC prototype can operate in the output speed range under different load torque conditions. With the same load torque, the duty cycle of the IGBT increases linearly with the increase of output speed. Moreover, with the same output speed, the duty cycle of the IGBT increases linearly with the increase of load torque.Table 5
Duty cycle of IGBT with different output speed and load torque (2D FEA).
Duty cycle of IGBT
Load torque (N⋅m)
10
20
30
40
Output speed (r/min)
100
0.25
0.29
0.32
0.36
200
0.45
0.49
0.52
0.56
300
0.64
0.68
0.72
0.76
400
0.84
0.88
0.92
0.96Table 6
Duty cycle of IGBT with different output speed and load torque (experimental).
Duty cycle of IGBT
Load torque (N⋅m)
10
20
30
40
Output speed (r/min)
100
0.29
0.33
0.37
0.42
200
0.47
0.52
0.56
0.6
300
0.66
0.71
0.75
0.79
400
0.86
0.9
0.94
0.99Figure 12
Output speed versus duty cycle of IGBT for load torque of 10 N⋅m.Figure 13
Output speed versus duty cycle of IGBT for load torque of 20 N⋅m.Figure 14
Output speed versus duty cycle of IGBT for load torque of 30 N⋅m.Figure 15
Output speed versus duty cycle of IGBT for load torque of 40 N⋅m.


## 6.4. Slip Power Recovery Performance

The slip power recovery efficiency, which is the ratio of the power recovered by the ultracapacitor to the slip power, is selected as the crucial index to evaluate the slip power recovery performance. Figure16 demonstrates the response of the terminal voltage of the ultracapacitor, and Table 7 gives the comparison of performance indices. In this case, the slip speed is constant at 400 r/min for the load torque of 40 N·m, which corresponds to the maximum slip power of 1675 W. From Figure 16, good agreements can be observed between the 2D FEA and experimental results. Note that the initial terminal voltage of the ultracapacitor is 43 V, and the time duration is 5 s. The final terminal voltages of the ultracapacitor for the 2D FEA and experimental measurements are 43.78 V and 43.67 V, respectively. According to (7), the power recovered by the ultracapacitor can be calculated, as shown in Table 7. Furthermore, the slip power recovery efficiency is calculated to be 66.7% and 57.2% for the 2D FEA and experimental measurements, respectively.Table 7
Comparison of performance indices.
Performance indices
2D FEA
Experimental
Final terminal voltage of ultracapacitor (V)
43.78
43.67
Power recovered by ultracapacitor (W)
1116.86
958.17
Slip power recovery efficiency (%)
66.7
57.2Figure 16
Terminal voltage of ultracapacitor.


## 7. Conclusions

In this paper, a novel WTPMC has been proposed to work as an adjustable speed drive with slip power recovery function. The structure and working principle of the WTPMC have been presented. Based on the working principle, its mathematical model has been derived. In order to develop a WTPMC prototype for automotive applications, the 2D FEA has been conducted using Ansoft Maxwell software to study the steady-state (constant slip speed) performance. For the experimental validation, the WTPMC prototype has been manufactured and tested on a test bench. The results computed with the 2D FEA have been compared with those obtained from experimental measurements. It is shown that the agreement between the 2D FEA and experimental results is good. Moreover, the WTPMC prototype can operate in the output speed range under different load torque conditions. The slip power recovery efficiency for the 2D FEA is 66.7%, while, for experimental measurements, it is 57.2%.



---

*Source: 3141089-2017-05-30.xml*