# Association between a Variant in MicroRNA-646 and the Susceptibility to Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Large-Scale Population

Authors: Rui Wang; Jun Zhang; Weiru Jiang; Yanyun Ma; Wenshuai Li; Bohan Jin; Heping Hu; Jiucun Wang; Yi Liu; Jie Liu
Journal: The Scientific World Journal
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Background. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in microRNAs play important roles in oncogenesis and cancer development. Objective. We aim to explore whether miR-646 rs6513497 is associated with the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods. Total 997 HCC patients and 993 cancer-free controls were enrolled in this study. Genotyping was performed using MassARRAY method. Results. Compared with the T allele of rs6513497, the G allele was associated with a significantly decreased risk of HCC (OR = 0.788, 95% CI = 0.631–0.985, P = 0.037); moreover, a more protective effect of the G allele was shown in males (OR = 0.695, 95% CI = 0.539–0.897, P = 0.005 in HCC and OR = 0.739, 95% CI = 0.562–0.972, P = 0.030 in HBV-related HCC), basically in a dominant manner (HCC: OR = 0.681, 95% CI = 0.162–0.896, P = 0.006; HBV-related HCC: OR = 0.715, 95% CI = 0.532–0.962, P = 0.027). Conclusions. Our findings support the view that the miR-646 SNP rs6513497 may contribute to the susceptibility of HCC.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent cancers and is the third leading cause of cancer-related death due to its extremely poor prognosis [1]. Both genetic and environmental factors can contribute to the occurrence of HCC. The chronic infection of the Hepatitis B or C virus is the main risk factor for HCC, while alcohol abuse, smoking, or exposure to toxic substances is also found to have the potential to increase the risk of HCC [2].MicroRNA (miRNA) is a class of single-stranded, 19–25 nucleotides in length, noncoding RNA molecules in eukaryotes. Binding to the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of target mRNAs, miRNA regulates the translation and degradation of its target mRNAs and thus influences the gene expression [3, 4]. More and more evidence has shown that miRNAs are strongly related to oncogenesis [5, 6]. It has been shown that miRNAs play critical roles in tumor suppression or carcinogenesis by regulating gene expression at posttranscriptional levels [7]. A large number of tumor-derived microRNAs exist in human serum/plasma in a stable, reproducible, and consistent form, which thus can serve as potential biomarkers for blood-based detection of human cancers [8, 9]. Therefore, as a regulatory molecule, miRNA offers us a new diagnostic approach for cancers. Indeed, a recent study screened a plasma microRNA panel and identified several miRNAs which showed high effectiveness and accuracy in HCC diagnosis [10]. Such inspiring result pushed forward the development of the early detection of HCC based on microRNA.Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), one form of DNA variation, are pervasive in miRNAs, including pri-miRNAs, pre-miRNAs, and mature miRNAs. They could influence various biological processes by changing the secondary structure of pre-miRNAs, interfering the maturation and/or target selection of miRNAs [11, 12], and may thus play roles in the development and progression of some cancers.Previous studies have shown that miR-646 is implicated in human cancers [13, 14]. Moreover, the SNPs in miR-646, rs112880289, rs6513496, and rs6513497, have been reported to be associated with the susceptibility to colorectal cancer [15]. Thus, it is worth questioning whether these SNPs are associated with HCC as well. However, rs112880289 is not valid in Han Chinese people while rs6513496 seems to have no effect on the structural stability of miR-646 precursor (Δ
Δ
G
<
0 KJ/mol calculated by miRNASNP database [16]). Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate the clinical significance of the miR-646 SNP rs6513497 in human HCC, by analyzing a case-control Chinese population of 997 HCC patients and 993 cancer-free controls.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Study Population

Subjects were recruited from a case-control Chinese population as described previously [17]. In brief, patients from Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University and Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were diagnosed with HCC by a pathological examination or a-fetoprotein elevation (>20 ug/L) combined with imaging examination (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI and/or computerized tomography, CT). Cancer-free controls from the Taizhou Longitudinal Study had no self-reported history of cancer. All subjects including both cases and controls were unrelated Chinese Han individuals residing in East China (Shanghai, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Jiangxi province). All patient materials including peripheral blood samples were obtained with informed consent, and the whole procedure was approved by local ethic review committee.


### 2.2. Genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from the peripheral blood of the participants using AxyPrep Blood Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, USA). Genotyping was done using Sequenom MassARRAY technique. The amplification primers were 5′-ACGTTGGATGCACACCTGCTTTTCACCTGT-3′ and 5′-ACGTTGGATGGTAAAGATAGGCCACTGAGC-3′, while the extension primer was 5′-CCCCCAGGAAGCAGCTGCCTC-3′.


### 2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 13.0) and Excel. Observed and expected genotype frequencies were evaluated for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) using Pearson’s chi-square test. Odds ratio (OR) adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, and drinking status, along with 95% confidence interval (CI), was determined by logistic regression. Pearson’s chi-square test was also used to assess qualitative data among different groups, while Student’st-test and nonparametric test were applied to compare quantitative variables. A two-sided P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


## 2.1. Study Population

Subjects were recruited from a case-control Chinese population as described previously [17]. In brief, patients from Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University and Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were diagnosed with HCC by a pathological examination or a-fetoprotein elevation (>20 ug/L) combined with imaging examination (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI and/or computerized tomography, CT). Cancer-free controls from the Taizhou Longitudinal Study had no self-reported history of cancer. All subjects including both cases and controls were unrelated Chinese Han individuals residing in East China (Shanghai, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Jiangxi province). All patient materials including peripheral blood samples were obtained with informed consent, and the whole procedure was approved by local ethic review committee.


## 2.2. Genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from the peripheral blood of the participants using AxyPrep Blood Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, USA). Genotyping was done using Sequenom MassARRAY technique. The amplification primers were 5′-ACGTTGGATGCACACCTGCTTTTCACCTGT-3′ and 5′-ACGTTGGATGGTAAAGATAGGCCACTGAGC-3′, while the extension primer was 5′-CCCCCAGGAAGCAGCTGCCTC-3′.


## 2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 13.0) and Excel. Observed and expected genotype frequencies were evaluated for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) using Pearson’s chi-square test. Odds ratio (OR) adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, and drinking status, along with 95% confidence interval (CI), was determined by logistic regression. Pearson’s chi-square test was also used to assess qualitative data among different groups, while Student’st-test and nonparametric test were applied to compare quantitative variables. A two-sided P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Sample Overview

997 HCC patients (including 771 HBV-related HCC patients) and 993 controls were enrolled in this study. The demographic characteristics were summarized in Table1. Briefly, it was shown that age, gender, and smoking status were significantly different between the cases and the controls (controls older than cases), while drinking status was no different between two groups.Table 1
General characteristics in hepatocellular carcinoma patients and controls.
Cases (n = 997)
Controls (n = 993)
P value
Number (%) or mean ± SD
Number (%) or mean ± SD
Age (years)
54.70 ± 11.27
59.57 ± 11.65
<0.001*
Gender
Male
819 (82.1)
721 (72.6)
<0.001*
Female
178 (17.9)
272 (27.4)
Smoking status
Never
665 (67.6)
527 (53.1)
<0.001*
Ever
319 (32.4)
466 (46.9)
Drinking status
Never
734 (74.4)
732 (73.7)
0.712
Ever
252 (25.6)
261 (26.3)
HBsAg (n = 951)
Negative
180 (18.9)
Positive
771 (81.1)
Tumor size (n = 540)
<5 cm
218 (40.4)
≥5 cm
322 (59.6)
Tumor number (n = 539)
Single
475 (88.1)
Multiple
64 (11.9)
Tumor grade (n = 385)
I-II
84 (21.8)
III-IV
301 (78.2)
Serum level of tumor markers
ALT (U/L, in 989 subjects)
58.29 ± 86.04
AST (U/L, in 985 subjects)
62.24 ± 81.06
AFP
<20 ug/L
363 (37.2)
≥20 ug/L
612 (62.8)
(ug/L, in 404 subjects)
126.87 ± 289.61 (0.6–1210)
HBV-DNA (IU/mL, in 450 subjects)
1.742
E
06
±
5.430
E
06 (1000
-
6.9
E
07)
*
P value less than 0.05.


### 3.2. Association between the miR-646 Variant and the Susceptibility to Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The genotype distributions of rs6513497 in controls, HCC patients, and HBV-related HCC patients are shown in Table2. In the logistic regression analysis between HCC and the control subjects, it was shown that in comparison with the T allele of rs6513497, the G allele were associated with a significantly decreased risk of HCC (OR
=
0.788, 95% CI = 0.631–0.985, P
=
0.037).Table 2
Association between genotypes/alleles of miR-646 rs6513497 and the risk of HCC.
Genotypes
Controls
HCC patients
HCC patients with HBV
Number (%)
Number (%)
OR (95% CI)a
P valuea
Number (%)
OR (95% CI)a
P valuea
miR-646 rs6513497
n = 993
n = 997
n = 771
TT
795 (80.1)
825 (82.7)
1.000
639 (82.9)
1.000
GT
186 (18.7)
166 (16.6)
0.812 (0.635–1.037)
0.095
126 (16.3)
0.814 (0.621–1.067)
0.137
GG
12 (12.2)
6 (0.6)
0.468 (0.167–1.308)
0.147
6 (0.8)
0.631 (0.222–1.793)
0.387
Dominant model(TT versus GT + GG)
0.791 (0.622–1.005)
0.055
0.803 (0.616–1.046)
0.104
Recessive model(TT + GT versus GG)
0.485 (0.174–1.355)
0.168
0.654 (0.230–1.856)
0.425
T
1776 (0.9)
1816 (0.9)
1.000
1402 (91.0)
1.000
G
210 (0.1)
178 (0.1)
0.788 (0.631–0.985)
0.037*
138 (9.0)
0.814 (0.637–1.039)
0.098
aORs and P values were all obtained after adjusting for age, gender, smoking status, and wine status.
P
* value less than 0.05.In males (Table3), some much more significant associations were found. Firstly, in comparison with the T allele of rs6513497, the G allele were associated with a greater decreased risk of HCC (adjusted OR
=
0.695, 95% CI = 0.539–0.897, P
=
0.005) and HBV-related HCC (adjusted OR
=
0.739, 95% CI = 0.562–0.972, P
=
0.030). Secondly, compared with the wild type TT of rs6513497, those with the GT genotype also have a decreased risk for HCC (adjusted OR of 0.692, 95% CI = 0.523–0.915, P
=
0.010) and HBV-related HCC (adjusted OR of 0.719, 95% CI = 0.531–0.973, P
=
0.033). Thirdly, we found that dominant model was suitable for the association between rs6513497 and the risk of HCC (OR
=
0.681, 95% CI = 0.162–0.896, P
=
0.006) or HBV-related HCC (OR
=
0.715, 95% CI = 0.532–0.962, P
=
0.027). Nevertheless, no association was founded in female subjects (Table 4).Table 3
Comparison of genotype/allele frequencies of miR-646 rs6513497 in male subjects.
Genotypes
Controls
HCC patients
HCC patients with HBV
Number (%)
Number (%)
OR (95% CI)a
P-valuea
Number (%)
OR (95% CI)a
P valuea
miR-646 rs6513497
n = 721
n = 819
n = 643
TT
570 (79.1)
685 (83.6)
1.000
536 (83.4)
1.000
GT
143 (19.8)
129 (15.8)
0.692 (0.523–0.915)
0.010*
102 (15.9)
0.719 (0.531–0.973)
0.033*
GG
8 (1.1)
5 (0.6)
0.492 (0.151–1.596)
0.237
5 (0.7)
0.650 (0.198–2.134)
0.478
Dominant model(TT versus GT + GG)
0.681 (0.517–0.896)
0.006*
0.715 (0.532–0.962)
0.027*
Recessive model(TT + GT versus GG)
0.525 (0.162–1.701)
0.023*
0.690 (0.211–2.259)
0.540
T
1283 (89.0)
1499 (91.5)
1.000
1172 (91.3)
1.000
G
159 (11.0)
139 (8.5)
0.695 (0.539–0.897)
0.005*
112 (8.7)
0.739 (0.562–0.972)
0.030*
aORs and P values were obtained after the adjustment of age, gender, smoking status, and wine status.
P
* value less than 0.05.Table 4
Comparison of genotype/allele frequencies of miR-646 rs6513497 in female subjects.
Genotypes
Controls
HCC patients
HCC patients with HBV
Number (%)
Number (%)
OR (95% CI)a
P valuea
Number (%)
OR (95% CI)a
P valuea
miR-646 rs6513497
n = 272
n = 178
n = 128
TT
225 (82.7)
140 (78.7)
1.000
103 (80.5)
1.000
GT
43 (15.8)
37 (20.8)
1.355 (0.817–2.246)
0.239
24 (18.8)
1.318 (0.727–2.389)
0.363
GG
4 (1.5)
1 (0.5)
0.409 (0.0443–0.799)
0.431
1 (0.7)
0.597 (0.061–5.833)
0.657
Dominant model(TT versus GT + GG)
1.274 (0.777–2.088)
0.377
1.254 (0.702–2.240)
0.444
Recessive model(TT + GT versus GG)
0.386 (0.042–3.579)
0.402
0.568 (0.058–5.534)
0.626
T
493 (90.6)
317 (89.0)
1.000
230 (89.8)
1.000
G
51 (9.4)
39 (11.0)
1.177 (0.746–1.855)
0.484
26 (10.2)
1.183 (0.693–2.018)
0.538
aORs and P values were obtained after adjusting for age, gender, smoking status, and wine status.


### 3.3. Association between rs6513497 and Demographic Characteristic in HCC Patients

The association between rs6513497 and HCC or HBV infection was also evaluated by stratifying on other clinical indexes including total bilirubin, HBV-DNA, ALT, AST, and the number, size, and grade of tumor foci. However, no significant heterogeneity was detected between the subgroups, suggesting the independent genetic effect of rs6513497 (Table5).Table 5
Clinicopathologic characteristics and genotype/allele frequencies of miR-646 rs6513497 in HCC patients.
Indexes
Genotype
P value
Allele
P value
Tumor size
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.713
T
G
0.617
<5 cm
180 (84.1)
35 (16.9)
0 (0)
395 (31.9)
35 (68.1)
≥5 cm
261 (82.6)
53 (16.8)
2 (0.6)
575 (34.3)
57 (65.7)
Tumor focus number
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.195
T
G
0.343
Single
396 (83.4)
78 (16.4)
1 (0.2)
870 (91.6)
80 (8.4)
Multiple
51 (79.7)
12 (18.8)
1 (1.5)
114 (89.1)
14 (10.9)
Tumor grade
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.897
T
G
0.771
I-II
71 (84.5)
13 (15.5)
0 (0)
155 (92.3)
13 (7.7)
III-IV
250 (83.1)
50 (16.6)
1 (0.3)
550 (91.4)
52 (8.6)
AFP
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.548
T
G
0.371
<20 ug/L
294 (81.0)
67 (18.5)
2 (0.6)
655 (90.2)
71 (9.8)
≥20 ug/L
511 (83.5)
97 (15.8)
4 (0.7)
1119 (91.4)
105 (8.6)
Total bilirubin
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.184
18.79 ± 0.94
20.12 ± 3.18
21.90 ± 2.86
Direct bilirubin
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.347
8.78 ± 0.70
9.91 ± 2.47
8.43 ± 1.32
Indirect bilirubin
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.125
9.81 ± 0.24
10.22 ± 0.77
13.50 ± 1.78
ALT
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.643
57.14 ± 2.79
59.92 ± 7.51
51.38 ± 8.13
AST
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.730
62.17 ± 2.78
63.58 ± 7.04
41.50 ± 3.90
HBV-DNA
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.526
1.73
E
06
±
2.85
E
05
1.73
E
06
±
6.15
E
05
2.93
E
06
±
1.68
E
06


## 3.1. Sample Overview

997 HCC patients (including 771 HBV-related HCC patients) and 993 controls were enrolled in this study. The demographic characteristics were summarized in Table1. Briefly, it was shown that age, gender, and smoking status were significantly different between the cases and the controls (controls older than cases), while drinking status was no different between two groups.Table 1
General characteristics in hepatocellular carcinoma patients and controls.
Cases (n = 997)
Controls (n = 993)
P value
Number (%) or mean ± SD
Number (%) or mean ± SD
Age (years)
54.70 ± 11.27
59.57 ± 11.65
<0.001*
Gender
Male
819 (82.1)
721 (72.6)
<0.001*
Female
178 (17.9)
272 (27.4)
Smoking status
Never
665 (67.6)
527 (53.1)
<0.001*
Ever
319 (32.4)
466 (46.9)
Drinking status
Never
734 (74.4)
732 (73.7)
0.712
Ever
252 (25.6)
261 (26.3)
HBsAg (n = 951)
Negative
180 (18.9)
Positive
771 (81.1)
Tumor size (n = 540)
<5 cm
218 (40.4)
≥5 cm
322 (59.6)
Tumor number (n = 539)
Single
475 (88.1)
Multiple
64 (11.9)
Tumor grade (n = 385)
I-II
84 (21.8)
III-IV
301 (78.2)
Serum level of tumor markers
ALT (U/L, in 989 subjects)
58.29 ± 86.04
AST (U/L, in 985 subjects)
62.24 ± 81.06
AFP
<20 ug/L
363 (37.2)
≥20 ug/L
612 (62.8)
(ug/L, in 404 subjects)
126.87 ± 289.61 (0.6–1210)
HBV-DNA (IU/mL, in 450 subjects)
1.742
E
06
±
5.430
E
06 (1000
-
6.9
E
07)
*
P value less than 0.05.


## 3.2. Association between the miR-646 Variant and the Susceptibility to Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The genotype distributions of rs6513497 in controls, HCC patients, and HBV-related HCC patients are shown in Table2. In the logistic regression analysis between HCC and the control subjects, it was shown that in comparison with the T allele of rs6513497, the G allele were associated with a significantly decreased risk of HCC (OR
=
0.788, 95% CI = 0.631–0.985, P
=
0.037).Table 2
Association between genotypes/alleles of miR-646 rs6513497 and the risk of HCC.
Genotypes
Controls
HCC patients
HCC patients with HBV
Number (%)
Number (%)
OR (95% CI)a
P valuea
Number (%)
OR (95% CI)a
P valuea
miR-646 rs6513497
n = 993
n = 997
n = 771
TT
795 (80.1)
825 (82.7)
1.000
639 (82.9)
1.000
GT
186 (18.7)
166 (16.6)
0.812 (0.635–1.037)
0.095
126 (16.3)
0.814 (0.621–1.067)
0.137
GG
12 (12.2)
6 (0.6)
0.468 (0.167–1.308)
0.147
6 (0.8)
0.631 (0.222–1.793)
0.387
Dominant model(TT versus GT + GG)
0.791 (0.622–1.005)
0.055
0.803 (0.616–1.046)
0.104
Recessive model(TT + GT versus GG)
0.485 (0.174–1.355)
0.168
0.654 (0.230–1.856)
0.425
T
1776 (0.9)
1816 (0.9)
1.000
1402 (91.0)
1.000
G
210 (0.1)
178 (0.1)
0.788 (0.631–0.985)
0.037*
138 (9.0)
0.814 (0.637–1.039)
0.098
aORs and P values were all obtained after adjusting for age, gender, smoking status, and wine status.
P
* value less than 0.05.In males (Table3), some much more significant associations were found. Firstly, in comparison with the T allele of rs6513497, the G allele were associated with a greater decreased risk of HCC (adjusted OR
=
0.695, 95% CI = 0.539–0.897, P
=
0.005) and HBV-related HCC (adjusted OR
=
0.739, 95% CI = 0.562–0.972, P
=
0.030). Secondly, compared with the wild type TT of rs6513497, those with the GT genotype also have a decreased risk for HCC (adjusted OR of 0.692, 95% CI = 0.523–0.915, P
=
0.010) and HBV-related HCC (adjusted OR of 0.719, 95% CI = 0.531–0.973, P
=
0.033). Thirdly, we found that dominant model was suitable for the association between rs6513497 and the risk of HCC (OR
=
0.681, 95% CI = 0.162–0.896, P
=
0.006) or HBV-related HCC (OR
=
0.715, 95% CI = 0.532–0.962, P
=
0.027). Nevertheless, no association was founded in female subjects (Table 4).Table 3
Comparison of genotype/allele frequencies of miR-646 rs6513497 in male subjects.
Genotypes
Controls
HCC patients
HCC patients with HBV
Number (%)
Number (%)
OR (95% CI)a
P-valuea
Number (%)
OR (95% CI)a
P valuea
miR-646 rs6513497
n = 721
n = 819
n = 643
TT
570 (79.1)
685 (83.6)
1.000
536 (83.4)
1.000
GT
143 (19.8)
129 (15.8)
0.692 (0.523–0.915)
0.010*
102 (15.9)
0.719 (0.531–0.973)
0.033*
GG
8 (1.1)
5 (0.6)
0.492 (0.151–1.596)
0.237
5 (0.7)
0.650 (0.198–2.134)
0.478
Dominant model(TT versus GT + GG)
0.681 (0.517–0.896)
0.006*
0.715 (0.532–0.962)
0.027*
Recessive model(TT + GT versus GG)
0.525 (0.162–1.701)
0.023*
0.690 (0.211–2.259)
0.540
T
1283 (89.0)
1499 (91.5)
1.000
1172 (91.3)
1.000
G
159 (11.0)
139 (8.5)
0.695 (0.539–0.897)
0.005*
112 (8.7)
0.739 (0.562–0.972)
0.030*
aORs and P values were obtained after the adjustment of age, gender, smoking status, and wine status.
P
* value less than 0.05.Table 4
Comparison of genotype/allele frequencies of miR-646 rs6513497 in female subjects.
Genotypes
Controls
HCC patients
HCC patients with HBV
Number (%)
Number (%)
OR (95% CI)a
P valuea
Number (%)
OR (95% CI)a
P valuea
miR-646 rs6513497
n = 272
n = 178
n = 128
TT
225 (82.7)
140 (78.7)
1.000
103 (80.5)
1.000
GT
43 (15.8)
37 (20.8)
1.355 (0.817–2.246)
0.239
24 (18.8)
1.318 (0.727–2.389)
0.363
GG
4 (1.5)
1 (0.5)
0.409 (0.0443–0.799)
0.431
1 (0.7)
0.597 (0.061–5.833)
0.657
Dominant model(TT versus GT + GG)
1.274 (0.777–2.088)
0.377
1.254 (0.702–2.240)
0.444
Recessive model(TT + GT versus GG)
0.386 (0.042–3.579)
0.402
0.568 (0.058–5.534)
0.626
T
493 (90.6)
317 (89.0)
1.000
230 (89.8)
1.000
G
51 (9.4)
39 (11.0)
1.177 (0.746–1.855)
0.484
26 (10.2)
1.183 (0.693–2.018)
0.538
aORs and P values were obtained after adjusting for age, gender, smoking status, and wine status.


## 3.3. Association between rs6513497 and Demographic Characteristic in HCC Patients

The association between rs6513497 and HCC or HBV infection was also evaluated by stratifying on other clinical indexes including total bilirubin, HBV-DNA, ALT, AST, and the number, size, and grade of tumor foci. However, no significant heterogeneity was detected between the subgroups, suggesting the independent genetic effect of rs6513497 (Table5).Table 5
Clinicopathologic characteristics and genotype/allele frequencies of miR-646 rs6513497 in HCC patients.
Indexes
Genotype
P value
Allele
P value
Tumor size
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.713
T
G
0.617
<5 cm
180 (84.1)
35 (16.9)
0 (0)
395 (31.9)
35 (68.1)
≥5 cm
261 (82.6)
53 (16.8)
2 (0.6)
575 (34.3)
57 (65.7)
Tumor focus number
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.195
T
G
0.343
Single
396 (83.4)
78 (16.4)
1 (0.2)
870 (91.6)
80 (8.4)
Multiple
51 (79.7)
12 (18.8)
1 (1.5)
114 (89.1)
14 (10.9)
Tumor grade
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.897
T
G
0.771
I-II
71 (84.5)
13 (15.5)
0 (0)
155 (92.3)
13 (7.7)
III-IV
250 (83.1)
50 (16.6)
1 (0.3)
550 (91.4)
52 (8.6)
AFP
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.548
T
G
0.371
<20 ug/L
294 (81.0)
67 (18.5)
2 (0.6)
655 (90.2)
71 (9.8)
≥20 ug/L
511 (83.5)
97 (15.8)
4 (0.7)
1119 (91.4)
105 (8.6)
Total bilirubin
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.184
18.79 ± 0.94
20.12 ± 3.18
21.90 ± 2.86
Direct bilirubin
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.347
8.78 ± 0.70
9.91 ± 2.47
8.43 ± 1.32
Indirect bilirubin
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.125
9.81 ± 0.24
10.22 ± 0.77
13.50 ± 1.78
ALT
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.643
57.14 ± 2.79
59.92 ± 7.51
51.38 ± 8.13
AST
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.730
62.17 ± 2.78
63.58 ± 7.04
41.50 ± 3.90
HBV-DNA
miR-646 rs6513497
TT
GT
GG
0.526
1.73
E
06
±
2.85
E
05
1.73
E
06
±
6.15
E
05
2.93
E
06
±
1.68
E
06


## 4. Discussion

Traditional diagnostic methods of HCC have suboptimal efficacy, sensitivity, and specificity [18, 19]. The demand of outstanding biomarkers and innovational methods with high validity and efficacy is extremely urgent [20]. The growing evidence has shown that microRNA, as a new tumor biomarker, has considerable potential to improve the accuracy of early diagnosis of HCC [21, 22]. For example, the plasma miRNA panel had high predictive accuracy for early-staged HCC [10], suggesting that miRNA could be served as a valid and noninvasive method for prediction and diagnosis of HCC. Besides, it has been well acknowledged that microRNA SNPs have relevance to the susceptibility to cancers [23, 24]. SNPs in pre-miRNAs or mature miRNAs, especially in the seed region, may interfere with miRNA processing and maturation and affect the specificity of gene silencing [25–27]. Aberrant expression of mature miRNAs or the alteration of their targets may contribute to the deregulation of relevant genes and finally lead to different cancer susceptibility, as well as different prognosis and treatment reaction [23]. Therefore, the identification of significant functional SNP sites may open a new avenue for HCC early diagnosis/predication.MiR-646 belongs to miR-15/107 gene group which serves key functions in humans such as cell division, metabolism, stress response, and angiogenesis. Moreover, there is a seed sequence “AGCAGC” near the 5′ end of the mature miR-646 [28]. Particularly, the miR-646 SNP rs6513497, which is in the seed sequence, has been identified to be involved in the susceptibility to colorectal cancer [15, 28] and potentially to be used as a noninvasive biomarker for cervical squamous cell carcinoma [13]. The secondary structure prediction by miRNASNP database [16] showed that the structure of miR-646 with the T allele of rs6513497 has a Δ
G of −34.2 KJ/mol, less than that with the G allele (Δ
G
=
-
33
.
4 KJ/mol), indicating that G allele may decrease the stability of miR-646 and then result in the dysregulation of mature miR-646.Thus, in this study, we investigated the association between rs6513497 and the susceptibility to HCC and HBV-related HCC in a large-scale population. Our findings support the view that rs6513497 was associated with HCC and HBV-related HCC. Furthermore, the protective effect of the variant genotypes of rs6513497 (GT genotype and the G allele) was more evident in male subjects, which decreases their HCC susceptibility. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to discover the association of miR-646 SNP with HCC susceptibility in clinical samples, suggesting that rs6513497 could be a useful marker to predict the risk of this disease. Further studies are required to explore the molecular function of this SNP. In addition, previous studies found that the SNPs of pri-miR-218 [29], miR-499 [30, 31], and miR-196a2 [32] were also associated with the risk of HCC. Their possible corporative effects and the underlying mechanisms are also worth being discovered.Using TargetScan [33] and miRanda [34] database, we found that the potential predicated target genes of miR-646 consist of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), WEE1 G2 checkpoint kinase (WEE1), and cyclin D2 (CCND2), which are involved in the development of liver cancer. rs6513497 may influence the target selection of miR-646 and then alter HCC predisposition in the population with this SNP. Although there is no report or predictive record showing that targets have been gained or lost by rs6513497 so far, such speculation is still worth being explored.In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the miR-646 SNP rs6513497 is associated with HCC, and the G allele may be a genetic protective factor which decreases the susceptibility of HCC, especially in male subjects. To better understand the relationship between rs6513497 and cancer risk, more functional studies of miR-646 and this SNP are proposed.



---

*Source: 312704-2014-08-07.xml*