# Panelist Acceptance, Proximate Characteristics of Amino Acids and Volatile Compounds, and Color Profile of Fermented Cempedak (Artocarpus champeden) and Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) Seasoning

Authors: Miftakhur Rohmah; Bernatal Saragih; Nur Amaliah; Rimbawan Apriadi; Anton Rahmadi
Journal: Journal of Food Quality
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

The potential of mandai cempedak (Artocarpus champeden) powder to be mixed with other abundant raw materials such as oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) as a flavoring ingredient is an exciting thing to study as a unique flavor source for the archipelago. This study aims to observe panelist acceptance, proximate characteristics of amino acid, volatile compounds, and color profiles on five mixed formulas of fermented cempedak (Artocarpus champeden) and oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) seasoning. The five seasoning formulas combine 30–70% flavored mushroom powder and 30–70% mandai cempedak powder with control of commercial mushroom powder and pure mandai powder. Hedonic quality assessment on seasoning samples of flavored mushroom powder and mandai cempedak powder played a more critical role in the acceptance of the final product, with a slightly reddish yellow color tendency with a paleness level of around 66–67%. Seasoning samples had a savory taste with dominant amino acid profiles of ileusine (1.46%, w/w), glutamate (1.37%), methionine (0.82%), and aspartic acid (0.72%). All seasoning formulations of flavored mushroom and mandai cempedak powder have a moisture content of 8.4–10.9%, total protein 7.0–9.0%, soluble protein 2.4–3.5%, ash content 4.5–19.2%, fat content 2.3–4.5%, carbohydrates 62.7–79.4%, and the solubility is 31.0–89.4%. The dominant volatile compounds in seasoning are heptanone, dodecoxyethanol, and etradecyloxyethanol with pleasant aroma profiles, pungent fruity, green, citrus, and herbal. In conclusion, mandai cempedak powder to be mixed with other abundant raw materials such as oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) can be used as a typical Indonesian flavor ingredient with unique characteristics in terms of its amino acid content, volatile compounds, and essential oils.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Mandai cempedak is a typical product from Kalimantan, and this product utilizes waste from the cempedak fruit (Artocarpus champeden). Mandai making is done by spontaneous fermentation and stored at room temperature. The processing steps include peeling the fruit skin, removing the epidermis, and soaking it in salt water to preserve and soften the texture. The duration of immersion is from several hours to a month [1]. The process of making mandai cempedak by induction of lactic acid bacteria starter has received a patent number S00201708792.Mandai cempedak can be used as a source of typical Indonesian flavor, as fruits with a strong and distinctive aroma. Mandai cempedak which has been fermented at 37°C for seven days has characteristics such as valeric acid (46.83% of the GCMS chromatogram area), lactic acid (8.17%), 1-hydroxy-2-propanone (7.86%), 3-isopropoxy-1, 1, 1, 7, 7, 7-hexamethyl-3,5,5-tris (trimethylsiloxy) tetrasiloxane (7.01%), and N-methyl-beta,3,4-tris (trimethylsiloxy) phenethylamine (6.86%). The typical mandai cempedak has been used in ice cream products [2]. One of the best drying results of fermented mandai cempedak is obtained at 45°C, with a total polyphenol content (TPC) of 358.8 ± 55.6 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE) kg−1 dry sample, total hydrolyzed tannin content (HTC) of 143.8 ± 9.3 mg tannic acid equivalent (TAE) kg−1 dry sample, total flavonoid content (TFC) of 17.5 ± 1.3 mg catechin equivalent (CAE) kg−1 dry sample, and antioxidant activity (IC50) 56.96 g/mL [1]. The taste of mandai cempedak as a plant-derived product fermented by lactic acid bacteria is preferred [1], similar to other fermented products [3]. Lactic acid bacteria as flavor enhancers and seasoning food products have been widely used [4–6].Oyster mushroom is a popular product widely used as a snack, usually served in dry, crispy fried foods. Oyster mushrooms have a taste readily accepted due to the high content of free amino acids [7]. The composition of umami components detected in mushrooms consisted of 5′-nucleotides groups, namely, inosinic acid (IMP), adenylate monophosphate (AMP), guanylate monophosphate (GMP), xanthosine monophosphate (XMP), and free amino acid groups, namely: aspartic and glutamic acid. The components of 5′-nucleotides and free amino acids are what cause the acceptance of oyster mushrooms to be the best when compared to other mushrooms [8].The potential of mandai cempedak powder to be mixed with other abundant raw materials such as oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) as a flavor ingredient is an interesting thing to study. The production process of vegetable seasoning from mandai cempedak and oyster mushrooms has been registered as a patent (no. S00202007443). The success of seasoning products is determined by the ability to improve the taste. Therefore, this study aims to observe the panelist acceptance, proximate characteristics, amino acids, volatile compounds, and color profile on five mixed formulas of fermented cempedak (Artocarpus champeden) and oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) seasoning.


## 2. Method

### 2.1. Mandai Cempedak Powder

The mandai cempedak fermentation process follows patent no S00201708792 regarding the suboptimal temperature slow fermentation process with starter culture for mandai cempedak production. Fermented mandai cempedak powder followed the previously published method [1]. The fermented mandai cempedak was separated from the liquid, and the solid was taken. The solid was dried at 55°C for 18 hours in a 300 W electric dryer.


### 2.2. Flavored Mushroom Powder

Fresh wet oyster mushrooms added with spices such as pepper (2.5%, w/w), shallot (10%, w/w), garlic (8%, w/w), sugar (2%, w/w), and salt (6%, w/w). Furthermore, the new oyster mushroom formula and seasonings mixture was dried at 55°C for 18 hours in a 300 W electric dryer. Mandai cempedak powder and mushroom and spice powder were mixed with specific formulations (6 combinations), as shown in Table1. Details of the vegetable seasoning production process from mandai cempedak (Artocarpus champeden) and oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) had been protected by patents in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia with registration number S00202007443.Table 1
Composition of flavored mushroom powder and mandai cempedak powder.
CodeFlavored mushroom powder (%)Mandai cempedak powder (%)A4060B7030C3070D5050E6040F∗Mandai cempedak powder (100%)GCommercial mushroom powder (100%)∗Sample F is only used as a comparison for sensory tests and will not be continued with further tests.


### 2.3. Hedonic and Hedonic Quality Tests

There are 30 panelists, ranging in age from 18 to 40 years, with a minimum education of a bachelor’s degree and having attended lectures on spice and seasoning technology. the term of Hedonic quality tests can be interchangeable with Acceptance quality tests and are carried out in a room designated for organoleptic tests. There is a separate tasting booth for each panelist. The table and partitions are white in color and are made of wood and have no odor. Room temperature ranges from 20 to 27°C with a humidity of 65–75%. The light source is a neutral LED lamp (3000°K). Tests were carried out simultaneously for six people. The panelist who carried out the test was in good health and gave a written statement to participate in the test. Testing time is around 10.00 and 16.00 Central Indonesia Time. The hedonic test uses 5 rating scales, namely, (5) very much like, (4) like, (3) somewhat like, (2) do not like, and (1) do not like it at all. The six formulas were tested for the quality of organoleptic acceptance consisting of taste, color, aroma, texture, and overall acceptance of the six treatments of the samples presented (Table2). The control product used was 0.5 g of commercial mushroom seasoning dissolved in 750 mL of boiling water (100°C). This formula refers to the product usage rules listed on the packaging. Sample and control were presented by dissolving seasoning at 100°C and served at 40°C. Then, as much as 30 mL of each sample was given to the panelists according to the minimum number of servings for organoleptic testing [9].Table 2
Hedonic quality scale.
ScaleSavorytasteBrowning colorMandai cempedak-specific odorFineness/roughnesstexture5Very savoryWhite-paleHighly sour cempedak fruitVery smooth4SavoryLight brownSour cempedak fruitFine smooth3A bit savoryBrownSlightly sour cempedak fruitA bit smooth2Not savoryDark brownLess sour cempedak presenceRough1Not very savoryVery darkCempedak presence not detectedVery roughThe assessment results obtained from all panelists were then analyzed by the nonparametric ANOVA method using the Kruskal–Wallis method with GraphPad Prism software version 8.0. If there is a significant difference at 5%, the differences between formulas are analyzed further with Dunn’s Test.


### 2.4. Proximate, Dissolved Protein, and Solubility Analysis

For samples of all treatments except control mandai cempedak powder 100% (sample F), solubility, water content, ash, protein, and fat were analyzed using the Sudarmadji method [10]. Carbohydrate content is calculated based on the difference between water, ash, protein, and fat content. The dissolved protein test was analyzed by the Rohman and Sumantri [11] method.


### 2.5. Amino Acid Analysis

Amino acid analysis (AAA) was performed using the standard fluorescence orthophthalaldehyde (OPA) method from the Laboratory Unit for Testing, Calibration and Certification Services, Bogor Agricultural University, procedure number IK.LP-04.7-LT-1.0. Conditions for HPLC (Shimadzu) were as follows: Thermo Scientific ODS-2 Hypersil column, buffers A and B, the gradient flow rate of mobile phase at 1 mL/min, and fluorescence detector (Shimadzu). Buffer A consisted of Na-acetate (pH 6.5; 0.02% w/v), Na-EDTA (0.005% w/v), methanol (9.00% v/v), and tetrahydrofuran (THF) (1, 50% v/v) dissolved in 1 liter of ultrapure water (Merck-Millipore). This buffer was filtered through 0.45 m Millipore paper and used for five days at room temperature (28 ± 2°C), stored in dark bottles, and filled with He or Nitrogen gas. Buffer B consists of 95% methanol and ultrapure water (Merck-Millipore). 0.45-micron Millipore paper was used for filtration.


### 2.6. Volatile Component Analysis (GCMS)

Seasoning powder analysis with GCMS was carried out using the modified method of Misnawi and Ariza [12]. Identification and determination of the volatile component content obtained using the GCMS instrument with the stages of work including (1) extraction with SPME (solid phase microextraction), (2) sample injection into the GCMS device, and (3) qualitative determination of volatile components.The volatile compound extraction phase with SPME (solid phase microextraction) begins with the sample weighing process. Seasoning powder weighed as much as 5 g placed in a vial with a capacity of 40 ml. Next, the vial containing the powder was heated with a water bath at 60°C. During the heating process in a water bath, the volatile components of the powder were extracted with SPME. The absorber used was polydimethylsyloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) polymer at 1 cm in length (Supelco, USA).Analysis of volatile component composition by GCMS: the GCMS instrument used is the GCMS-QP2010 Plus Shimadzu which is equipped with a split-split less injector which is set at 260°C. The MS detector temperature was set at 200°C. The column used is Rtx-50 with an inner diameter of 0.25 mm, a length of 30 m, and a thickness of 0.25 m. The detector temperature was programmed at an initial temperature of 60°C for 3 minutes, and then the temperature was increased to 220°C for 20 minutes at a rate of 5°C/minute. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a rate of 3 mL/min. Samples of 1 L were injected by the split less method. Sampling time is 1.00 min with flow control in the pressure mode. The pressure used is 38.9 kPa with a total flow of 37.5 mL/min and a column flow of 0.78 mL/min. The linear velocity was measured at 32.2 cm/sec, the purge flow was measured at 3.0 mL/min, and the split ratio was set at −1.0. The analysis was carried out at the UPT Bioscience Laboratory, Jember State Polytechnic, Jember, East Java. The peaks on chromatogram were identified using Shimadzu Mass Spectral Libraries and Databases.


### 2.7. Color Analysis

For samples, all treatments except control of 100% mandai cempedak powder (sample F) were carried out using the Chromameter CR-400 instrument at the food technology laboratory of Gadjah Mada University Yogyakarta.L∗, a∗, and b∗ values determine color coordinates in the CIELAB color space system.


## 2.1. Mandai Cempedak Powder

The mandai cempedak fermentation process follows patent no S00201708792 regarding the suboptimal temperature slow fermentation process with starter culture for mandai cempedak production. Fermented mandai cempedak powder followed the previously published method [1]. The fermented mandai cempedak was separated from the liquid, and the solid was taken. The solid was dried at 55°C for 18 hours in a 300 W electric dryer.


## 2.2. Flavored Mushroom Powder

Fresh wet oyster mushrooms added with spices such as pepper (2.5%, w/w), shallot (10%, w/w), garlic (8%, w/w), sugar (2%, w/w), and salt (6%, w/w). Furthermore, the new oyster mushroom formula and seasonings mixture was dried at 55°C for 18 hours in a 300 W electric dryer. Mandai cempedak powder and mushroom and spice powder were mixed with specific formulations (6 combinations), as shown in Table1. Details of the vegetable seasoning production process from mandai cempedak (Artocarpus champeden) and oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) had been protected by patents in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia with registration number S00202007443.Table 1
Composition of flavored mushroom powder and mandai cempedak powder.
CodeFlavored mushroom powder (%)Mandai cempedak powder (%)A4060B7030C3070D5050E6040F∗Mandai cempedak powder (100%)GCommercial mushroom powder (100%)∗Sample F is only used as a comparison for sensory tests and will not be continued with further tests.


## 2.3. Hedonic and Hedonic Quality Tests

There are 30 panelists, ranging in age from 18 to 40 years, with a minimum education of a bachelor’s degree and having attended lectures on spice and seasoning technology. the term of Hedonic quality tests can be interchangeable with Acceptance quality tests and are carried out in a room designated for organoleptic tests. There is a separate tasting booth for each panelist. The table and partitions are white in color and are made of wood and have no odor. Room temperature ranges from 20 to 27°C with a humidity of 65–75%. The light source is a neutral LED lamp (3000°K). Tests were carried out simultaneously for six people. The panelist who carried out the test was in good health and gave a written statement to participate in the test. Testing time is around 10.00 and 16.00 Central Indonesia Time. The hedonic test uses 5 rating scales, namely, (5) very much like, (4) like, (3) somewhat like, (2) do not like, and (1) do not like it at all. The six formulas were tested for the quality of organoleptic acceptance consisting of taste, color, aroma, texture, and overall acceptance of the six treatments of the samples presented (Table2). The control product used was 0.5 g of commercial mushroom seasoning dissolved in 750 mL of boiling water (100°C). This formula refers to the product usage rules listed on the packaging. Sample and control were presented by dissolving seasoning at 100°C and served at 40°C. Then, as much as 30 mL of each sample was given to the panelists according to the minimum number of servings for organoleptic testing [9].Table 2
Hedonic quality scale.
ScaleSavorytasteBrowning colorMandai cempedak-specific odorFineness/roughnesstexture5Very savoryWhite-paleHighly sour cempedak fruitVery smooth4SavoryLight brownSour cempedak fruitFine smooth3A bit savoryBrownSlightly sour cempedak fruitA bit smooth2Not savoryDark brownLess sour cempedak presenceRough1Not very savoryVery darkCempedak presence not detectedVery roughThe assessment results obtained from all panelists were then analyzed by the nonparametric ANOVA method using the Kruskal–Wallis method with GraphPad Prism software version 8.0. If there is a significant difference at 5%, the differences between formulas are analyzed further with Dunn’s Test.


## 2.4. Proximate, Dissolved Protein, and Solubility Analysis

For samples of all treatments except control mandai cempedak powder 100% (sample F), solubility, water content, ash, protein, and fat were analyzed using the Sudarmadji method [10]. Carbohydrate content is calculated based on the difference between water, ash, protein, and fat content. The dissolved protein test was analyzed by the Rohman and Sumantri [11] method.


## 2.5. Amino Acid Analysis

Amino acid analysis (AAA) was performed using the standard fluorescence orthophthalaldehyde (OPA) method from the Laboratory Unit for Testing, Calibration and Certification Services, Bogor Agricultural University, procedure number IK.LP-04.7-LT-1.0. Conditions for HPLC (Shimadzu) were as follows: Thermo Scientific ODS-2 Hypersil column, buffers A and B, the gradient flow rate of mobile phase at 1 mL/min, and fluorescence detector (Shimadzu). Buffer A consisted of Na-acetate (pH 6.5; 0.02% w/v), Na-EDTA (0.005% w/v), methanol (9.00% v/v), and tetrahydrofuran (THF) (1, 50% v/v) dissolved in 1 liter of ultrapure water (Merck-Millipore). This buffer was filtered through 0.45 m Millipore paper and used for five days at room temperature (28 ± 2°C), stored in dark bottles, and filled with He or Nitrogen gas. Buffer B consists of 95% methanol and ultrapure water (Merck-Millipore). 0.45-micron Millipore paper was used for filtration.


## 2.6. Volatile Component Analysis (GCMS)

Seasoning powder analysis with GCMS was carried out using the modified method of Misnawi and Ariza [12]. Identification and determination of the volatile component content obtained using the GCMS instrument with the stages of work including (1) extraction with SPME (solid phase microextraction), (2) sample injection into the GCMS device, and (3) qualitative determination of volatile components.The volatile compound extraction phase with SPME (solid phase microextraction) begins with the sample weighing process. Seasoning powder weighed as much as 5 g placed in a vial with a capacity of 40 ml. Next, the vial containing the powder was heated with a water bath at 60°C. During the heating process in a water bath, the volatile components of the powder were extracted with SPME. The absorber used was polydimethylsyloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) polymer at 1 cm in length (Supelco, USA).Analysis of volatile component composition by GCMS: the GCMS instrument used is the GCMS-QP2010 Plus Shimadzu which is equipped with a split-split less injector which is set at 260°C. The MS detector temperature was set at 200°C. The column used is Rtx-50 with an inner diameter of 0.25 mm, a length of 30 m, and a thickness of 0.25 m. The detector temperature was programmed at an initial temperature of 60°C for 3 minutes, and then the temperature was increased to 220°C for 20 minutes at a rate of 5°C/minute. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a rate of 3 mL/min. Samples of 1 L were injected by the split less method. Sampling time is 1.00 min with flow control in the pressure mode. The pressure used is 38.9 kPa with a total flow of 37.5 mL/min and a column flow of 0.78 mL/min. The linear velocity was measured at 32.2 cm/sec, the purge flow was measured at 3.0 mL/min, and the split ratio was set at −1.0. The analysis was carried out at the UPT Bioscience Laboratory, Jember State Polytechnic, Jember, East Java. The peaks on chromatogram were identified using Shimadzu Mass Spectral Libraries and Databases.


## 2.7. Color Analysis

For samples, all treatments except control of 100% mandai cempedak powder (sample F) were carried out using the Chromameter CR-400 instrument at the food technology laboratory of Gadjah Mada University Yogyakarta.L∗, a∗, and b∗ values determine color coordinates in the CIELAB color space system.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Acceptance/Hedonic Analysis

Table3 describes the acceptability (hedonic) analysis results for the six seasoning formulas derived from a mixture of mushroom-spice powder and mandai powder in terms of taste, color, aroma, texture, and overall acceptability parameters. In general, the aroma and texture of all samples were not significantly different compared to control references (samples F and G). However, in terms of taste acceptance, the seasoning sample with a composition of 70% flavored mushroom powder and 30% mandai cempedak powder (B) showed an acceptance closer to the control of commercial mushroom powder. Of course, this is because sample B has the highest content of the flavored mushroom powder. On the other hand, on the color parameter, the seasoning sample with a composition of 30% mushroom spice powder and 70% mandai cempedak powder (C) had a different reception when compared to control references (sample F and G). At the drying time, mandai cempedak powder will have a pale color, presumably because the color is influenced by water content. The phenomenon of discoloration in the drying process of foodstuffs has also been reported in garlic powder [13].Table 3
The acceptability analysis for the six seasoning formulas.
SampleTasteColorOdorTextureOverallA2.7 ± 1.0a3.6 ± 0.6a3.5 ± 0.8a3.5 ± 0.8a3.0 ± 0.8aB3.4 ± 1.0ab3.9 ± 0.5a3.6 ± 0.7a3.9 ± 0.6a3.7 ± 1.0bC3.0 ± 1.0a3.2 ± 0.8b3.2 ± 0.8a3.6 ± 0.8a3.2 ± 0.9bD2.7 ± 0.7a3.4 ± 0.8a3.1 ± 0.8a3.5 ± 0.9a3.0 ± 0.9aE3.1 ± 0.7a3.6 ± 0.7a3.3 ± 0.8a3.6 ± 0.9a3.1 ± 0.7bF3.1 ± 0.8a3.6 ± 0.8a3.2 ± 0.9a3.3 ± 1.0a3.5 ± 1.1bG3.6 ± 0.9b3.8 ± 0.6a3.5 ± 0.9a3.7 ± 0.7a3.6 ± 0.9bOverall, the panelists assessed that the seasoning sample with a composition of 40% flavored mushroom powder and 60% mandai cempedak powder (A) and the seasoning sample with a composition of 50% flavored mushroom powder and 50% mandai cempedak powder (D) were significantly different when compared to control references (samples F and G). Therefore, the difference in acceptance between the components of the assessment parameters does not seem to be a consideration for overall approval. Still, the panelists are likely to focus more on the hedonic quality than on the product’s hedonic rating only. Therefore, it is suspected that the panelists emphasized the hedonic quality aspect, which is cognitively more valuable when compared to the general acceptance of likes and dislikes [14]. Furthermore, the psychochemical characteristics produced in each formula, including soluble protein and fat (Figure 1), are thought to influence the likes and dislikes of a product [15].Figure 1
Results of the proximate analysis, soluble protein, and water solubility.Values are presented in average ± standard deviation. Different letter after the values indicates the respective values are significantly different (p<0.05) in comparison to control references (samples F and G).


### 3.2. Hedonic Quality Analysis

Hedonic quality analysis was carried out on taste parameters with an umami scale of very unsavory to very savory, color parameters with a dark scale due to browning to pale white, aroma parameters with a ranking of very unscented to very fragrant, and texture parameters with a very coarse scale leading to very smooth. After going through the nonparametric ANOVA test, the aroma parameters were not significantly different for all samples (Table4).Table 4
Results of hedonic quality analysis.
SampleSavory TasteBrowning ColorMandai cempedak-specific odorFineness/roughness textureA2.8 ± 0.8a2.5 ± 0.9a3.2 ± 0.8a3.8 ± 0.7aB3.2 ± 0.9b3.4 ± 1.0c3.3 ± 0.9a3.6 ± 0.9acC2.8 ± 0.9a2.7 ± 1.2a3.2 ± 0.9a3.9 ± 0.6acD2.7 ± 0.8a2.5 ± 1.2a3.4 ± 0.9a3.8 ± 0.7acThe highest savory taste was found in commercial mushroom powder (sample G). Furthermore, the seasoning sample with a composition of 70% flavored mushroom powder and 30% mandai cempedak powder (B) and a sample with a composition of 60% flavored mushroom powder and 40% mandai cempedak powder (E) were not statistically different (p<0.05) when compared with control references (samples F and G). The combination of compositions in the range of 60–70% flavored mushroom powder and 30–40% mandai cempedak powder is a balanced composition in terms of the umami quality of the seasoning products produced. The composition plays an essential role in determining the taste of the final product, especially in seasoning, as has been observed in similar products [16], sea grape protein hydrolysate sauce [17], and dried Suillus granulatus products [18].The panelists can significantly distinguish the two reference controls from the texture and color parameters (F and G). Flavored mushrooms play an important role in determining texture and color. The texture tendency of the combination composition of 50–70% flavored mushroom powder and 30–50% mandai cempedak powder (B, C, D, and E) is closer to the texture of commercial mushroom powder (G). Due to the presence of spices such as pepper and shallots, the seasoning color tends to be dark, with a score of 2.5 ± 1.2 (dark brown) to 3.4 ± 1.0 (pale brown). For texture, mixing mandai cempedak powder with mushroom spice powder increased the acceptability observed in the control of mandai cempedak powder, namely, 1.7 ± 1.0 (tends to be coarse) to a range of 3.6 ± 0.9 to 3.9 ± 0.6 (tends to be rough and fine). Brown color is an indicator of the Maillard reaction in food raw materials. The stronger the browning reaction caused by heating, the darker the resulting color. However, in the browning reaction of some products, such asTakifugu obscurus by-products hydrolysates [19], the product’s taste is more acceptable to the panelists as the degree of browning increases to a certain extent. The drying process, heat treatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, and frying will change the taste of the food. Amino acid umami imagers are generally primary residues of peptides that have the N-terminus position. Peptides have umami imagers with double or triple sequences because the heating process can amplify the umami taste [18].Values are presented in average ± standard deviation. A different letter after the values indicates the respective value is significantly different (p<0.05) in comparison to control references (samples F and G).


### 3.3. Proximate Analysis, Soluble Protein, and Solubility

Proximate analysis of seasoning of flavored mushroom powder and mandai cempedak powder was carried out to observe changes in composition due to formulation. For example, the seasoning sample with a composition of 70% flavored mushroom powder and 30% mandai cempedak powder (B) and a seasoning sample with a composition of 30% flavored mushroom powder and 70% mandai cempedak powder (C) turned out to contain dissolved protein, total protein, ash, fat, and carbohydrates were significantly different (Figure1). Furthermore, the seasoning sample with a composition of 40% mushroom spice powder and 60% mandai cempedak powder (A) and the seasoning sample with a composition of 60% flavored mushroom powder and 40% mandai cempedak powder (E) also had significantly different proximate content and solubility. Likewise, the seasoning sample with a composition of 60% flavored mushroom powder and 40% mandai cempedak powder (D) was significantly different from all other samples tested. From Figure 1, it can be concluded that the 10% difference in each composition of the flavored mushroom powder and mandai cempedak powder will influence the proximate levels of the resulting seasoning.


### 3.4. Amino Acid Analysis

Table5 presents the results of the amino acid analysis of (i) mandai cempedak powder, (ii) unflavored mushroom powder, (iii) flavored mushroom powder, and (iv) sample (E) 50% flavored mushroom powder and 50% mandai cempedak powder obtained with the chromatographic method. These data show that pure mushroom powder (ii) has more than double the total amino acid composition than mandai cempedak powder (i). The largest different compositions are in the amino acids leusine, glutamate, ileusine, aspartic acid, alanine, and phenylalanine. Amino acids related to umami taste are aspartic acid and glutamate.Table 5
Amino acid composition of flavored mushroom powder and mandai cempedak powder.
Amino acid (%w/w)(i) Mandai cempedak powder(ii) Unflavored mushroom powder(iii) Flavored mushroom powder(iv) Sample (E) 50% flavored mushroom powder and 50% mandai cempedak powderAspartic acid0.551.121.280.72Threonine0.270.590.680.44Serine0.30.590.670.46Glutamate0.972.072.151.37Glysine0.310.620.630.43Alanine0.360.920.880.56Valine0.40.680.950.04Methionine0.030.190.210.82The addition of spices increased the amino acids valine from 0.68 to 0.95% and aspartic acid by about 0.16%, and to a lesser extent, threonine, serine, and methionine (Table5). The composition of the spices used was pepper (2.5%, w/w), shallot (10%, w/w), and garlic (8%, w/w). Glutamic acid, aspartic acid, leucine, proline, and alanine are dominant amino acids in pepper (Piper nigrum) powder [20]. Shallots (Allium cepa) have dominant amino acids: arginine, glutamate, aspartic acid, threonine, leucine, and valine [21]. The predominant amino acid contents of garlic (Allium sativum) are proline, glutamate, phenylalanine, valine, and asparagine, in addition to alliin and methiin degradation products [22]. The addition of valine from the composition of the spice ingredients is obtained from shallots and garlic. Aspartic acid in flavored mushroom powder (iii) is obtained from pepper and shallot. Threonine is mainly sourced from onions.In the sample of 50% mushroom spice powder and 50% mandai cempedak powder, the most significant compositions of amino acids were ileusine (1.46%, w/w), glutamate (1.37%), methionine (0.82%), aspartic acid (0.72%), and then the other amino acids (Table5). This shows that the resulting seasoning will enhance savory flavors [23]. The total amino acids for these products are 9.08% or less when compared to unseasoned mushroom powder.


### 3.5. Volatile Component Analysis (GCMS)

The composition of volatile compounds from samples (i) mandai cempedak powder, (ii) mushroom powder without spices, (iii) mushroom powder, and (iv) samples (E) 50% flavored mushroom powder and 50% mandai cempedak powder were presented chromatographically on Figure2, and the results of identification with the Mass Spectro (Shimadzu) databank are presented in Table 6. Several compounds that dominate when viewed from the % area for mandai cempedak powder are (1) 1-hexanol, 2-ethyl-(cas)2-ethyl hexanol (6% area), (2) 1-dodecanol (cas) n-dodecanol (6.89% area), (3) oxirane, [(dodecyloxy)methyl]-(cas) lauryl glycidyl ether (8.85% area), (4) morpholine, 4-octadecyl-(7.41% area), (5) 9-octadecenoic acid (z)-(cas) oleic acid (14.12% area), and (6) furo [3,4-d]-1,3,2-dioxaborole, 2-ethyltetrahydro-cis-(cas) (6.26% area). Halim et al. [24] have analyzed the aromatic components of tropical fruits such as jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus). The aromatic components of the fruit are characterized as decanoic acid, 1-decene, methyl salicylate, and stearyl alcohol. Meanwhile, hexanol, dodecanol, oxirane, morpholine, and octadecenoic acid are characteristics of fermented and powdered mandai cempedak.Figure 2
Chromatogram of GCMS.Table 6
Results of GCMS identification of the content of volatile compounds.
(i) Mandai cempedak powder(ii) Unflavored mushroom powder(iii) Flavored mushroom powder(iv) Sample (E) 50% flavored mushroom powder and 50% mandai cempedak powderCompound name% AreaCompound name% AreaCompound name% AreaCompound name% Area1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl- (cas) 2-ethylhexanol6.48Beta,d-xylopyranose tetrabenzoate0.66Ethanol, 2- (2-ethoxyethoxy)- (cas) 2- (2-ethoxyethoxy) ethanol1.264-Heptanol (cas) dipropylcarbinol0.75Ethane, 1,1′-oxybis [2-ethoxy- (cas) bis (2-ethoxyethyl) ether0.81Ethane, 1,1′-oxybis [2-ethoxy- (cas) bis (2-ethoxyethyl) ether2.531-Octanol (cas) octilin1.80Ethane, 1,1′-oxybis [2-ethoxy- (cas) bis (2-ethoxyethyl) ether1.28Ethanol, 2,2′-oxybis- (cas) diethylene glycol2.79Butanoic acid, 4-chloro2.081-Allyl-cyclopropanecarboxylic acid10.78Butanoic acid, 4-chloro2.521-Decanol (cas) decyl alcohol1.831-Pentanol, 3-methyl- (cas) 3-methyl-1-pentanol1.502,6-Dihydro-2h-pyran-2-one5.761-Hexanol, 3-methyl- (cas) 3-methyl-1-hexanol1.28Butanoic acid, butyl ester (cas) n-butyl n-butyrate0.64Ethanedial, monohydrate, dimer (cas) glyoxal monohydrate dimer0.512,5-Furandione (cas) maleic anhydride2.296-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one8.261-Heptanol, 6-methyl- (cas) 6-methyl-1-heptanol1.176-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one15.513-Oxo-alpha-ionone0.692-Propenoic acid, 3-[ (phenylmethyl) sulfonyl]-, methyl ester, (z)1.75Heptanoic acid (cas) heptoic acid0.592,5-Furandione (cas) maleic anhydride1.83[3r- (3.alpha.,3a.alpha.,5as,7a.alpha.,11a.beta.,11b.alpha.)]- (+)-1,3,3a,6,7,7a,8,9,10,11,11a,11b-Dodecahydro-3-hydroxy-8,8,11a-trimethyl-2h-cyclobuta [j] phenanthren-3-carboxylic acid methyl ester0.492-Furan methanol, tetrahydro- (cas) tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol0.741-Pentanol, 5-cyclopropyliden-0.762H-Pyran, 2-butoxytetrahydro- (cas) n-butyl tetrahydropyranyl ether0.47Bis-[3-oxo-6′-diethylamino-spiro (phthalan-1,9′-xanth-2-yl] sulphide1.15Phenyllactic acid benzyl ester0.942-Propenamide, 2-methyl-n-phenyl-1.384-Benzyloxy-1-bromobutane0.46Acetonyl decyl ether0.432 (3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-methyl- (cas) lactone 3-methylbutyric acid1.35Decanoic acid, 2-hydroxy- (cas) 2-hydroxy decanoic acid0.32Guanidine, methyl-hydrochloride (cas) n-methylguanidine hydrochloride3.411-Dodecanol (cas) n-dodecanol8.51Oxetane, 2-propyl- (cas) 2-n-propyl-oxetan2.501-Dodecanol (cas) n-dodecanol6.89Oxetane, 2-propyl- (cas) 2-n-propyl-oxetan1.981-Tetradecanol (cas) alfol 140.88Rs-2,3-hexanediol0.652-Propyldecan-1-ol0.36Beta-myrcene1.252-Nonen-1-ol0.43Cyclohexylidene triflate1.31Hexadecanoic acid (cas) palmitic acid5.112-Propenamide, 2-methyl-n-phenyl-2.216.Beta-acetoxy-3.alpha-angeloyloxy-1,10.beta-epoxyfuranolremophilan0.64Decane, 1-chloro- (cas) 1-chlorodecane1.76Tridecane, 4-cyclohexyl1.611-Dodecanol (cas) n-dodecanol3.301-Heptadecene (cas) hexahydroaplotaxene2.681- (1,3-Dimethylcyclohex-2-enyl) propan-2-one0.851,3-Dimethyl-1,3-dispeptidin-2,4-dione0.39Azetidine, 1-nitroso- (cas) nitrosoazetidine0.84Ethanol, 2- (dodecyloxy)- (cas) dodecoxyethanol8.341-Undecanol (cas) n-undecanol4.172-Propenamide, 2-methyl-n-phenyl0.882H-Pyran-3,4-dihydro-2-carboxamide0.65Butane, 2,2-dimethyl- (cas) 2,2-dimethylbutane0.6110-Oxoundecyl acetate0.521-Propyl-1-[ (tert-butyldimethylsilyl) oxy] perfloroheptene0.20Tridecanoic acid (cas) tridecylic acid0.88Methyl 2-azidobenzoate0.433-Chloro-2-methyl-1-propanol0.781-Tridecanol (cas) n-tridecanol3.55Bis-[3-oxo-6′-diethylamino-spiro (phthalan)-1,9′-xanth-2′-yl]sulphide0.791- (3- (Morpholin-4-yl) propyl)cyclopentanol0.83Hexadecanoic acid (cas) palmitic acid3.42Oxirane, 2,3-diethyl- (cas) 3,4-epoxyhexane0.452H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-pentyl- (cas) 5-decanolide1.16N,n-dimethyl-heptadecylamine1.423-Hydroxy-4,4-dimethyldihydro (2-13c)furan-2-one0.68Cyclohexane, (1,1-dimethylethyl)- (cas) tert-butylcyclohexane0.221-Heptadecanol (cas) n-heptadecanol1.39Nonanoic acid, 7-methyl-, methyl ester (cas) methyl 7-methylnonanoate4.39Bis-[3-oxo-6′-diethylamino-spiro (phthalan-1,9′-xanth-2'-yl]sulphide0.84Di-lauryl thio-di-propionate0.14Acetamide, n- (2-phenylethyl)- (cas) n- (2-phenylethyl) acetamide3.84(+)-Dehydrocamphor0.431-Hexadecanol (cas) cetal2.22Octadecanoic acid, (2-phenyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl) methyl ester (cas) benzylidene glycerol stearate2.347.Alpha-methacryloyloxy-or-tiglinoyloxy-9-beta-methacrycoyloxy-or-tiglin-oyloxy-1-oxo-alpha0.42Dodecane, 1,1′-oxybis- (cas) didodecane ether1.122-Hexylallyl alcohol0.58Oxirane, [ (dodecyloxy) methyl]- (cas) lauryl glycidyl ether8.851-Hexacosanol (cas) hexacosanol-110.97Hexadecanoic acid (cas) palmitic acid6.16Butane, 2-chloro-2-methyl- (cas) tert-amyl chloride1.74Ethanedione, diphenyl- (cas) benzil0.851- (3- (Morpholin-4-yl) propyl) cyclopentanol0.513-Methyldioxopiperazine0.69Ethanol, 2- (dodecyloxy)- (cas) dodecoxyethanol14.011-Undecene, 9-methyl- (cas)0.782-Propenamide, n-[2- (dimethylamino) ethyl]-0.882,3,6,7-Tetramethyl-10- (4-methylphenylsulfonyloxy)-1,4,4.alpha.,5,8,8a.beta.,9.beta.,9a.beta.,10.alpha.,10a.alpha.-decahydroanthracen-9-ol3.63N-methyl-n-nitro-o-benzoylhydroxylamine0.72Morpholine, 4-octadecyl-7.41Nonanoic acid, 7-methyl-, methyl ester (cas) methyl 7-methylnonanoate2.03Pulegone0.971 h-1,2,4-Triazole, 1-methyl- (cas) 1-methyl-1,2,4-triazole0.67Furo [3,4-d]-1,3,2-dioxaborole, 2-ethyltetrahydro-, cis- (cas)6.269-Octadecenoic acid (z)- (cas) oleic acid1.341,6-Dioxaspiro [4.4] non-3-ene0.424-Methylpent-3-en-2-ol1.452h-Pyran-2-methanol, tetrahydro- (cas) 2-methanol tetrahydropyran0.46Bicyclo (3.3.1) nonan-1-ol0.71Docosane (cas) n-docosane1.551-Hydroxy-cyclohexanecarboxylic acid tert-butyl-amide1.50Ethyl tridecanoate0.82Octadecanoic acid (cas) stearic acid5.812-Ethyl-5-methylfuran0.40Heptadecanoic acid, methyl ester (cas) methyl heptadecanoate1.729-Octadecenoic acid (z)- (cas) oleic acid14.122-Heptanol, 5-ethyl- (cas) 5-ethyl-2-heptanol8.29Pentanal, 2,3-dimethyl- (cas) 2,3-dimethylpentanal1.181-Fluoro-2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-3-pentanone0.811-Docosanol (cas) behenic alcohol3.53(3r∗,4r∗)-3,4-Dimethyl-1-butyn-4-ol0.7910-Undecenoic acid, methyl ester (cas) methyl 10-undecenoate3.641,2-Hydrazinedicarboxaldehyde (cas) 1,2-diformylhydrazine1.111,14-Tetradecanediol (cas) tetra decamethylene glycol1.836- (Allyloxy) hexane-1,2-diol1.439-Octadecyne (cas)3.949-Octadecenoic acid (z)- (cas) oleic acid10.24Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 3-methylbutyl ester (cas) apple oil0.442-Pyrazoline, 1-butyl-5-methyl- (cas) 5-methyl-1-n-butyl-delta[2]-pyrazoline1.14Diethyl (decyloxy)-borane2.13Ethanol, 2- (tetradecyloxy)- (cas) 2-tetradecyloxyethanol6.995-Undecene, 3-methyl-, (e)- (cas)0.92Morpholine, 4-octadecyl0.90Methyl 3-[ (tetrahydropyranyl)oxy] but-2-enoate0.442-Cyanato methyl cyclohexane2.25Morpholine, 4-octadecyl-6.49Methylester of 3-cyclohexyl-propionic acid2.201,3-Dioxolane, 2- (1,1-dimethylethyl)- (cas) 2-t-butyl-1,3-dioxolane0.445-Oxo-tetrahydro-furan-2-carboxylic acid2.18Nonanoic acid, 7-methyl-, methyl ester (cas) methyl 7-methylnonanoate0.65Bombykol4.921-Methyl-cis-2- (n, n-dimethylaminomethyl-d2)isopropylidenecyclopentane0.962,3,13-Trioxabicyclo [8.2.1] tridecane1.13Silane, chloro (1,1-dimethylethyl) dimethyl-0.56Propane, 2-chloro-2-methyl- (cas) tert-butyl chloride0.595-Iminopyrrolidine-2-carbonitrile0.492-Thiazolamine (cas) abadol0.819-Octadecenoic acid (z)- (cas) oleic acid4.454-Methylchloride-hex-4-ene-1-ol0.473′,4′'-Dihydro-2′'- (morpholin-4-yl)-5′,7′-dinitrospiro[cyclopentane-1,3′-quinazoline]3.00Methylester of 3-cyclohexyl-propionic acid1.63Nonane, 3-methyl-5-propyl- (cas)0.49Cyclohexanepropanoic acid (cas) 3-cyclohexylpropionic acid1.27Octanal, 7-methoxy-3,7-dimethyl- (cas) methoxycitronellal0.62Cyclooctene, 3-methyl-2.88Laurinsaeure, hex-3-enylester0.631-Vinyl-1-cyclopropyl methyl ether0.431,3-Dioxolane, 2-pentadecyl- (cas) 2-pentadecyl-1,3-dioxolane0.61Propane, 1- (ethenyloxy)-2-methyl- (cas) isobutyl vinyl ether0.78Morpholine, 4-octadecyl-0.691-Thymine-2-deoxy-.beta.-d-ribofuranos-5-yl butanoate0.49Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl- (cas) 2,6,10,15-tetramethylheptadecane4.67Hexadecanoic acid (cas) palmitic acid3.09Spiropentane-1,3-dicarboxaldehyde0.13Citronellyl isobutyrate2.301,3-Dioxolane, 2-pentadecyl- (cas) 2-pentadecyl-1,3-dioxolane0.65Cyclohexaneethanol (cas) 2-cyclohexylethanol1.63Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl- (cas) 2,6,10,15-tetramethylheptadecane0.73Bicyclo [2.2.2] octan-1-ol (cas) 1-hydroxybicyclo [2.2.2] octane2.443-Dodecanol, 3,7,11-trimethyl- (cas) hexahydronerolidol0.402,3,4-Trimethyl-1-pentanol1.792-{[5-Methyl-1- (1-methylethenyl)-5-hexenyloxy] methyl}furan0.573′,4′-Dihydro-2'- (morpholin-4-Yl)-5′,7′-dinitrospiro [cyclopentane-1,3′-Quinazoline]7.68Tricosane, 2-methyl- (CAS) 2-methyltricosane1.702H-Pyran-2-methanol, tetrahydro- (cas) 2-methanol tetrahydropyran1.87Some of the compounds identified for the mushroom powder samples without spices were (1) 1-hexacosanol (cas) hexacosanol-1 (10.97% area), (2) 2-heptanol, 5-ethyl-(cas) 5-ethyl-2-heptanol (8.29% area), (3) 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (15.51% area), and (4) octadecanoic acid (cas) stearic acid (5.81% area). Tagkouli et al. [25] and Selli et al. [26] identified aromatic compounds in fresh Pleurotus ostreatus mushrooms into groups of (1) eight carbon atoms compounds, (2) alcohols, (3) aldehydes, (4) fatty acids (FAME methyl esters), (5) toluene, and (6) ketones. The powdering process causes the volatile components of oyster mushroom powder to be dominated by alcohol, furan, and fatty acids and their derivatives.Gas chromatography can be used to detect compounds that affect the olfactory, as in previous studies [27]. The validity of the test results from the GCMS is influenced by several things, mainly, the calibration of the tool, the accuracy of the test method, and the preparation of materials [28]. Judging from the results obtained in the tested samples (Table 6), the groups of compounds that appeared were mostly ethanol, furans, esters, ethers, fatty acids, and volatile acids. The flavored mushroom powder sample had several compounds identified as (1) 1-allyl-cyclopropane carboxylic acid (10.78% area), (2) 2,6-dihydro-2 h-pyran-2-one (5.76% area), (3) 1-dodecanol (cas) n-dodecanol (8.51% area), (4) ethanol, 2-(dodecyloxy)-(cas) dodecoxyethanol (8.34% area), (5) Hexadecanoic acid (cas) palmitic acid (6.16% area), and (6) 3′,4′-dihydro-2′-(morpholin-4-Yl) (7.68% area). Some compounds with significant area on the GCMS chromatogram for samples (E) 50% flavored mushroom powder and 50% mandai cempedak powder were (1) 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (8.26% area), (2) ethanol, 2-(dodecyloxy)-(cas) dodecoxyethanol (14.01% area), and (3) ethanol, 2-(tetradecyloxy)-(cas) 2-tetradecyloxyethanol (6.99% area).


### 3.6. Color Analysis

The color mapping of a product sample referring to the CIELAB color space is identified by three parameters:L∗, a∗, and b∗. The L∗ represents the brightness from dark (black) to light (white), starting from zero (dark) to 100 (light). In contrast, a∗ is the range with the identification of green (negative a∗) to red (positive a∗) and the b∗ axis is the range with the identification of blue (negative b∗) to yellow (positive b∗) [29]. All formulations had a color tendency similar to that of commercial mushroom powder control referring to the data presented in Table 7, namely, with brightness ranging from 65.68 to 67.06 (tends to be pale), positive a∗ chromatic (tends to red), and positive b∗ chromatic with larger values (tends to strengthen to yellow). The a∗ color chromatic range for all samples and controls of commercial mushroom powders was 4.53–5.83 and b∗ 21.46–22.46. From this data, it can be concluded that the color tendency of the formulation is slightly reddish yellow with a paleness level of around 66–67%.Table 7
Results of color analysis.
CodeSample (flavored mushroom powder:mandai cempedak powder, %)L∗a∗b∗A40 : 6066.285.8321.46B70 : 3066.85.8221.48


## 3.1. Acceptance/Hedonic Analysis

Table3 describes the acceptability (hedonic) analysis results for the six seasoning formulas derived from a mixture of mushroom-spice powder and mandai powder in terms of taste, color, aroma, texture, and overall acceptability parameters. In general, the aroma and texture of all samples were not significantly different compared to control references (samples F and G). However, in terms of taste acceptance, the seasoning sample with a composition of 70% flavored mushroom powder and 30% mandai cempedak powder (B) showed an acceptance closer to the control of commercial mushroom powder. Of course, this is because sample B has the highest content of the flavored mushroom powder. On the other hand, on the color parameter, the seasoning sample with a composition of 30% mushroom spice powder and 70% mandai cempedak powder (C) had a different reception when compared to control references (sample F and G). At the drying time, mandai cempedak powder will have a pale color, presumably because the color is influenced by water content. The phenomenon of discoloration in the drying process of foodstuffs has also been reported in garlic powder [13].Table 3
The acceptability analysis for the six seasoning formulas.
SampleTasteColorOdorTextureOverallA2.7 ± 1.0a3.6 ± 0.6a3.5 ± 0.8a3.5 ± 0.8a3.0 ± 0.8aB3.4 ± 1.0ab3.9 ± 0.5a3.6 ± 0.7a3.9 ± 0.6a3.7 ± 1.0bC3.0 ± 1.0a3.2 ± 0.8b3.2 ± 0.8a3.6 ± 0.8a3.2 ± 0.9bD2.7 ± 0.7a3.4 ± 0.8a3.1 ± 0.8a3.5 ± 0.9a3.0 ± 0.9aE3.1 ± 0.7a3.6 ± 0.7a3.3 ± 0.8a3.6 ± 0.9a3.1 ± 0.7bF3.1 ± 0.8a3.6 ± 0.8a3.2 ± 0.9a3.3 ± 1.0a3.5 ± 1.1bG3.6 ± 0.9b3.8 ± 0.6a3.5 ± 0.9a3.7 ± 0.7a3.6 ± 0.9bOverall, the panelists assessed that the seasoning sample with a composition of 40% flavored mushroom powder and 60% mandai cempedak powder (A) and the seasoning sample with a composition of 50% flavored mushroom powder and 50% mandai cempedak powder (D) were significantly different when compared to control references (samples F and G). Therefore, the difference in acceptance between the components of the assessment parameters does not seem to be a consideration for overall approval. Still, the panelists are likely to focus more on the hedonic quality than on the product’s hedonic rating only. Therefore, it is suspected that the panelists emphasized the hedonic quality aspect, which is cognitively more valuable when compared to the general acceptance of likes and dislikes [14]. Furthermore, the psychochemical characteristics produced in each formula, including soluble protein and fat (Figure 1), are thought to influence the likes and dislikes of a product [15].Figure 1
Results of the proximate analysis, soluble protein, and water solubility.Values are presented in average ± standard deviation. Different letter after the values indicates the respective values are significantly different (p<0.05) in comparison to control references (samples F and G).


## 3.2. Hedonic Quality Analysis

Hedonic quality analysis was carried out on taste parameters with an umami scale of very unsavory to very savory, color parameters with a dark scale due to browning to pale white, aroma parameters with a ranking of very unscented to very fragrant, and texture parameters with a very coarse scale leading to very smooth. After going through the nonparametric ANOVA test, the aroma parameters were not significantly different for all samples (Table4).Table 4
Results of hedonic quality analysis.
SampleSavory TasteBrowning ColorMandai cempedak-specific odorFineness/roughness textureA2.8 ± 0.8a2.5 ± 0.9a3.2 ± 0.8a3.8 ± 0.7aB3.2 ± 0.9b3.4 ± 1.0c3.3 ± 0.9a3.6 ± 0.9acC2.8 ± 0.9a2.7 ± 1.2a3.2 ± 0.9a3.9 ± 0.6acD2.7 ± 0.8a2.5 ± 1.2a3.4 ± 0.9a3.8 ± 0.7acThe highest savory taste was found in commercial mushroom powder (sample G). Furthermore, the seasoning sample with a composition of 70% flavored mushroom powder and 30% mandai cempedak powder (B) and a sample with a composition of 60% flavored mushroom powder and 40% mandai cempedak powder (E) were not statistically different (p<0.05) when compared with control references (samples F and G). The combination of compositions in the range of 60–70% flavored mushroom powder and 30–40% mandai cempedak powder is a balanced composition in terms of the umami quality of the seasoning products produced. The composition plays an essential role in determining the taste of the final product, especially in seasoning, as has been observed in similar products [16], sea grape protein hydrolysate sauce [17], and dried Suillus granulatus products [18].The panelists can significantly distinguish the two reference controls from the texture and color parameters (F and G). Flavored mushrooms play an important role in determining texture and color. The texture tendency of the combination composition of 50–70% flavored mushroom powder and 30–50% mandai cempedak powder (B, C, D, and E) is closer to the texture of commercial mushroom powder (G). Due to the presence of spices such as pepper and shallots, the seasoning color tends to be dark, with a score of 2.5 ± 1.2 (dark brown) to 3.4 ± 1.0 (pale brown). For texture, mixing mandai cempedak powder with mushroom spice powder increased the acceptability observed in the control of mandai cempedak powder, namely, 1.7 ± 1.0 (tends to be coarse) to a range of 3.6 ± 0.9 to 3.9 ± 0.6 (tends to be rough and fine). Brown color is an indicator of the Maillard reaction in food raw materials. The stronger the browning reaction caused by heating, the darker the resulting color. However, in the browning reaction of some products, such asTakifugu obscurus by-products hydrolysates [19], the product’s taste is more acceptable to the panelists as the degree of browning increases to a certain extent. The drying process, heat treatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, and frying will change the taste of the food. Amino acid umami imagers are generally primary residues of peptides that have the N-terminus position. Peptides have umami imagers with double or triple sequences because the heating process can amplify the umami taste [18].Values are presented in average ± standard deviation. A different letter after the values indicates the respective value is significantly different (p<0.05) in comparison to control references (samples F and G).


## 3.3. Proximate Analysis, Soluble Protein, and Solubility

Proximate analysis of seasoning of flavored mushroom powder and mandai cempedak powder was carried out to observe changes in composition due to formulation. For example, the seasoning sample with a composition of 70% flavored mushroom powder and 30% mandai cempedak powder (B) and a seasoning sample with a composition of 30% flavored mushroom powder and 70% mandai cempedak powder (C) turned out to contain dissolved protein, total protein, ash, fat, and carbohydrates were significantly different (Figure1). Furthermore, the seasoning sample with a composition of 40% mushroom spice powder and 60% mandai cempedak powder (A) and the seasoning sample with a composition of 60% flavored mushroom powder and 40% mandai cempedak powder (E) also had significantly different proximate content and solubility. Likewise, the seasoning sample with a composition of 60% flavored mushroom powder and 40% mandai cempedak powder (D) was significantly different from all other samples tested. From Figure 1, it can be concluded that the 10% difference in each composition of the flavored mushroom powder and mandai cempedak powder will influence the proximate levels of the resulting seasoning.


## 3.4. Amino Acid Analysis

Table5 presents the results of the amino acid analysis of (i) mandai cempedak powder, (ii) unflavored mushroom powder, (iii) flavored mushroom powder, and (iv) sample (E) 50% flavored mushroom powder and 50% mandai cempedak powder obtained with the chromatographic method. These data show that pure mushroom powder (ii) has more than double the total amino acid composition than mandai cempedak powder (i). The largest different compositions are in the amino acids leusine, glutamate, ileusine, aspartic acid, alanine, and phenylalanine. Amino acids related to umami taste are aspartic acid and glutamate.Table 5
Amino acid composition of flavored mushroom powder and mandai cempedak powder.
Amino acid (%w/w)(i) Mandai cempedak powder(ii) Unflavored mushroom powder(iii) Flavored mushroom powder(iv) Sample (E) 50% flavored mushroom powder and 50% mandai cempedak powderAspartic acid0.551.121.280.72Threonine0.270.590.680.44Serine0.30.590.670.46Glutamate0.972.072.151.37Glysine0.310.620.630.43Alanine0.360.920.880.56Valine0.40.680.950.04Methionine0.030.190.210.82The addition of spices increased the amino acids valine from 0.68 to 0.95% and aspartic acid by about 0.16%, and to a lesser extent, threonine, serine, and methionine (Table5). The composition of the spices used was pepper (2.5%, w/w), shallot (10%, w/w), and garlic (8%, w/w). Glutamic acid, aspartic acid, leucine, proline, and alanine are dominant amino acids in pepper (Piper nigrum) powder [20]. Shallots (Allium cepa) have dominant amino acids: arginine, glutamate, aspartic acid, threonine, leucine, and valine [21]. The predominant amino acid contents of garlic (Allium sativum) are proline, glutamate, phenylalanine, valine, and asparagine, in addition to alliin and methiin degradation products [22]. The addition of valine from the composition of the spice ingredients is obtained from shallots and garlic. Aspartic acid in flavored mushroom powder (iii) is obtained from pepper and shallot. Threonine is mainly sourced from onions.In the sample of 50% mushroom spice powder and 50% mandai cempedak powder, the most significant compositions of amino acids were ileusine (1.46%, w/w), glutamate (1.37%), methionine (0.82%), aspartic acid (0.72%), and then the other amino acids (Table5). This shows that the resulting seasoning will enhance savory flavors [23]. The total amino acids for these products are 9.08% or less when compared to unseasoned mushroom powder.


## 3.5. Volatile Component Analysis (GCMS)

The composition of volatile compounds from samples (i) mandai cempedak powder, (ii) mushroom powder without spices, (iii) mushroom powder, and (iv) samples (E) 50% flavored mushroom powder and 50% mandai cempedak powder were presented chromatographically on Figure2, and the results of identification with the Mass Spectro (Shimadzu) databank are presented in Table 6. Several compounds that dominate when viewed from the % area for mandai cempedak powder are (1) 1-hexanol, 2-ethyl-(cas)2-ethyl hexanol (6% area), (2) 1-dodecanol (cas) n-dodecanol (6.89% area), (3) oxirane, [(dodecyloxy)methyl]-(cas) lauryl glycidyl ether (8.85% area), (4) morpholine, 4-octadecyl-(7.41% area), (5) 9-octadecenoic acid (z)-(cas) oleic acid (14.12% area), and (6) furo [3,4-d]-1,3,2-dioxaborole, 2-ethyltetrahydro-cis-(cas) (6.26% area). Halim et al. [24] have analyzed the aromatic components of tropical fruits such as jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus). The aromatic components of the fruit are characterized as decanoic acid, 1-decene, methyl salicylate, and stearyl alcohol. Meanwhile, hexanol, dodecanol, oxirane, morpholine, and octadecenoic acid are characteristics of fermented and powdered mandai cempedak.Figure 2
Chromatogram of GCMS.Table 6
Results of GCMS identification of the content of volatile compounds.
(i) Mandai cempedak powder(ii) Unflavored mushroom powder(iii) Flavored mushroom powder(iv) Sample (E) 50% flavored mushroom powder and 50% mandai cempedak powderCompound name% AreaCompound name% AreaCompound name% AreaCompound name% Area1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl- (cas) 2-ethylhexanol6.48Beta,d-xylopyranose tetrabenzoate0.66Ethanol, 2- (2-ethoxyethoxy)- (cas) 2- (2-ethoxyethoxy) ethanol1.264-Heptanol (cas) dipropylcarbinol0.75Ethane, 1,1′-oxybis [2-ethoxy- (cas) bis (2-ethoxyethyl) ether0.81Ethane, 1,1′-oxybis [2-ethoxy- (cas) bis (2-ethoxyethyl) ether2.531-Octanol (cas) octilin1.80Ethane, 1,1′-oxybis [2-ethoxy- (cas) bis (2-ethoxyethyl) ether1.28Ethanol, 2,2′-oxybis- (cas) diethylene glycol2.79Butanoic acid, 4-chloro2.081-Allyl-cyclopropanecarboxylic acid10.78Butanoic acid, 4-chloro2.521-Decanol (cas) decyl alcohol1.831-Pentanol, 3-methyl- (cas) 3-methyl-1-pentanol1.502,6-Dihydro-2h-pyran-2-one5.761-Hexanol, 3-methyl- (cas) 3-methyl-1-hexanol1.28Butanoic acid, butyl ester (cas) n-butyl n-butyrate0.64Ethanedial, monohydrate, dimer (cas) glyoxal monohydrate dimer0.512,5-Furandione (cas) maleic anhydride2.296-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one8.261-Heptanol, 6-methyl- (cas) 6-methyl-1-heptanol1.176-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one15.513-Oxo-alpha-ionone0.692-Propenoic acid, 3-[ (phenylmethyl) sulfonyl]-, methyl ester, (z)1.75Heptanoic acid (cas) heptoic acid0.592,5-Furandione (cas) maleic anhydride1.83[3r- (3.alpha.,3a.alpha.,5as,7a.alpha.,11a.beta.,11b.alpha.)]- (+)-1,3,3a,6,7,7a,8,9,10,11,11a,11b-Dodecahydro-3-hydroxy-8,8,11a-trimethyl-2h-cyclobuta [j] phenanthren-3-carboxylic acid methyl ester0.492-Furan methanol, tetrahydro- (cas) tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol0.741-Pentanol, 5-cyclopropyliden-0.762H-Pyran, 2-butoxytetrahydro- (cas) n-butyl tetrahydropyranyl ether0.47Bis-[3-oxo-6′-diethylamino-spiro (phthalan-1,9′-xanth-2-yl] sulphide1.15Phenyllactic acid benzyl ester0.942-Propenamide, 2-methyl-n-phenyl-1.384-Benzyloxy-1-bromobutane0.46Acetonyl decyl ether0.432 (3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-methyl- (cas) lactone 3-methylbutyric acid1.35Decanoic acid, 2-hydroxy- (cas) 2-hydroxy decanoic acid0.32Guanidine, methyl-hydrochloride (cas) n-methylguanidine hydrochloride3.411-Dodecanol (cas) n-dodecanol8.51Oxetane, 2-propyl- (cas) 2-n-propyl-oxetan2.501-Dodecanol (cas) n-dodecanol6.89Oxetane, 2-propyl- (cas) 2-n-propyl-oxetan1.981-Tetradecanol (cas) alfol 140.88Rs-2,3-hexanediol0.652-Propyldecan-1-ol0.36Beta-myrcene1.252-Nonen-1-ol0.43Cyclohexylidene triflate1.31Hexadecanoic acid (cas) palmitic acid5.112-Propenamide, 2-methyl-n-phenyl-2.216.Beta-acetoxy-3.alpha-angeloyloxy-1,10.beta-epoxyfuranolremophilan0.64Decane, 1-chloro- (cas) 1-chlorodecane1.76Tridecane, 4-cyclohexyl1.611-Dodecanol (cas) n-dodecanol3.301-Heptadecene (cas) hexahydroaplotaxene2.681- (1,3-Dimethylcyclohex-2-enyl) propan-2-one0.851,3-Dimethyl-1,3-dispeptidin-2,4-dione0.39Azetidine, 1-nitroso- (cas) nitrosoazetidine0.84Ethanol, 2- (dodecyloxy)- (cas) dodecoxyethanol8.341-Undecanol (cas) n-undecanol4.172-Propenamide, 2-methyl-n-phenyl0.882H-Pyran-3,4-dihydro-2-carboxamide0.65Butane, 2,2-dimethyl- (cas) 2,2-dimethylbutane0.6110-Oxoundecyl acetate0.521-Propyl-1-[ (tert-butyldimethylsilyl) oxy] perfloroheptene0.20Tridecanoic acid (cas) tridecylic acid0.88Methyl 2-azidobenzoate0.433-Chloro-2-methyl-1-propanol0.781-Tridecanol (cas) n-tridecanol3.55Bis-[3-oxo-6′-diethylamino-spiro (phthalan)-1,9′-xanth-2′-yl]sulphide0.791- (3- (Morpholin-4-yl) propyl)cyclopentanol0.83Hexadecanoic acid (cas) palmitic acid3.42Oxirane, 2,3-diethyl- (cas) 3,4-epoxyhexane0.452H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-pentyl- (cas) 5-decanolide1.16N,n-dimethyl-heptadecylamine1.423-Hydroxy-4,4-dimethyldihydro (2-13c)furan-2-one0.68Cyclohexane, (1,1-dimethylethyl)- (cas) tert-butylcyclohexane0.221-Heptadecanol (cas) n-heptadecanol1.39Nonanoic acid, 7-methyl-, methyl ester (cas) methyl 7-methylnonanoate4.39Bis-[3-oxo-6′-diethylamino-spiro (phthalan-1,9′-xanth-2'-yl]sulphide0.84Di-lauryl thio-di-propionate0.14Acetamide, n- (2-phenylethyl)- (cas) n- (2-phenylethyl) acetamide3.84(+)-Dehydrocamphor0.431-Hexadecanol (cas) cetal2.22Octadecanoic acid, (2-phenyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl) methyl ester (cas) benzylidene glycerol stearate2.347.Alpha-methacryloyloxy-or-tiglinoyloxy-9-beta-methacrycoyloxy-or-tiglin-oyloxy-1-oxo-alpha0.42Dodecane, 1,1′-oxybis- (cas) didodecane ether1.122-Hexylallyl alcohol0.58Oxirane, [ (dodecyloxy) methyl]- (cas) lauryl glycidyl ether8.851-Hexacosanol (cas) hexacosanol-110.97Hexadecanoic acid (cas) palmitic acid6.16Butane, 2-chloro-2-methyl- (cas) tert-amyl chloride1.74Ethanedione, diphenyl- (cas) benzil0.851- (3- (Morpholin-4-yl) propyl) cyclopentanol0.513-Methyldioxopiperazine0.69Ethanol, 2- (dodecyloxy)- (cas) dodecoxyethanol14.011-Undecene, 9-methyl- (cas)0.782-Propenamide, n-[2- (dimethylamino) ethyl]-0.882,3,6,7-Tetramethyl-10- (4-methylphenylsulfonyloxy)-1,4,4.alpha.,5,8,8a.beta.,9.beta.,9a.beta.,10.alpha.,10a.alpha.-decahydroanthracen-9-ol3.63N-methyl-n-nitro-o-benzoylhydroxylamine0.72Morpholine, 4-octadecyl-7.41Nonanoic acid, 7-methyl-, methyl ester (cas) methyl 7-methylnonanoate2.03Pulegone0.971 h-1,2,4-Triazole, 1-methyl- (cas) 1-methyl-1,2,4-triazole0.67Furo [3,4-d]-1,3,2-dioxaborole, 2-ethyltetrahydro-, cis- (cas)6.269-Octadecenoic acid (z)- (cas) oleic acid1.341,6-Dioxaspiro [4.4] non-3-ene0.424-Methylpent-3-en-2-ol1.452h-Pyran-2-methanol, tetrahydro- (cas) 2-methanol tetrahydropyran0.46Bicyclo (3.3.1) nonan-1-ol0.71Docosane (cas) n-docosane1.551-Hydroxy-cyclohexanecarboxylic acid tert-butyl-amide1.50Ethyl tridecanoate0.82Octadecanoic acid (cas) stearic acid5.812-Ethyl-5-methylfuran0.40Heptadecanoic acid, methyl ester (cas) methyl heptadecanoate1.729-Octadecenoic acid (z)- (cas) oleic acid14.122-Heptanol, 5-ethyl- (cas) 5-ethyl-2-heptanol8.29Pentanal, 2,3-dimethyl- (cas) 2,3-dimethylpentanal1.181-Fluoro-2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-3-pentanone0.811-Docosanol (cas) behenic alcohol3.53(3r∗,4r∗)-3,4-Dimethyl-1-butyn-4-ol0.7910-Undecenoic acid, methyl ester (cas) methyl 10-undecenoate3.641,2-Hydrazinedicarboxaldehyde (cas) 1,2-diformylhydrazine1.111,14-Tetradecanediol (cas) tetra decamethylene glycol1.836- (Allyloxy) hexane-1,2-diol1.439-Octadecyne (cas)3.949-Octadecenoic acid (z)- (cas) oleic acid10.24Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 3-methylbutyl ester (cas) apple oil0.442-Pyrazoline, 1-butyl-5-methyl- (cas) 5-methyl-1-n-butyl-delta[2]-pyrazoline1.14Diethyl (decyloxy)-borane2.13Ethanol, 2- (tetradecyloxy)- (cas) 2-tetradecyloxyethanol6.995-Undecene, 3-methyl-, (e)- (cas)0.92Morpholine, 4-octadecyl0.90Methyl 3-[ (tetrahydropyranyl)oxy] but-2-enoate0.442-Cyanato methyl cyclohexane2.25Morpholine, 4-octadecyl-6.49Methylester of 3-cyclohexyl-propionic acid2.201,3-Dioxolane, 2- (1,1-dimethylethyl)- (cas) 2-t-butyl-1,3-dioxolane0.445-Oxo-tetrahydro-furan-2-carboxylic acid2.18Nonanoic acid, 7-methyl-, methyl ester (cas) methyl 7-methylnonanoate0.65Bombykol4.921-Methyl-cis-2- (n, n-dimethylaminomethyl-d2)isopropylidenecyclopentane0.962,3,13-Trioxabicyclo [8.2.1] tridecane1.13Silane, chloro (1,1-dimethylethyl) dimethyl-0.56Propane, 2-chloro-2-methyl- (cas) tert-butyl chloride0.595-Iminopyrrolidine-2-carbonitrile0.492-Thiazolamine (cas) abadol0.819-Octadecenoic acid (z)- (cas) oleic acid4.454-Methylchloride-hex-4-ene-1-ol0.473′,4′'-Dihydro-2′'- (morpholin-4-yl)-5′,7′-dinitrospiro[cyclopentane-1,3′-quinazoline]3.00Methylester of 3-cyclohexyl-propionic acid1.63Nonane, 3-methyl-5-propyl- (cas)0.49Cyclohexanepropanoic acid (cas) 3-cyclohexylpropionic acid1.27Octanal, 7-methoxy-3,7-dimethyl- (cas) methoxycitronellal0.62Cyclooctene, 3-methyl-2.88Laurinsaeure, hex-3-enylester0.631-Vinyl-1-cyclopropyl methyl ether0.431,3-Dioxolane, 2-pentadecyl- (cas) 2-pentadecyl-1,3-dioxolane0.61Propane, 1- (ethenyloxy)-2-methyl- (cas) isobutyl vinyl ether0.78Morpholine, 4-octadecyl-0.691-Thymine-2-deoxy-.beta.-d-ribofuranos-5-yl butanoate0.49Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl- (cas) 2,6,10,15-tetramethylheptadecane4.67Hexadecanoic acid (cas) palmitic acid3.09Spiropentane-1,3-dicarboxaldehyde0.13Citronellyl isobutyrate2.301,3-Dioxolane, 2-pentadecyl- (cas) 2-pentadecyl-1,3-dioxolane0.65Cyclohexaneethanol (cas) 2-cyclohexylethanol1.63Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl- (cas) 2,6,10,15-tetramethylheptadecane0.73Bicyclo [2.2.2] octan-1-ol (cas) 1-hydroxybicyclo [2.2.2] octane2.443-Dodecanol, 3,7,11-trimethyl- (cas) hexahydronerolidol0.402,3,4-Trimethyl-1-pentanol1.792-{[5-Methyl-1- (1-methylethenyl)-5-hexenyloxy] methyl}furan0.573′,4′-Dihydro-2'- (morpholin-4-Yl)-5′,7′-dinitrospiro [cyclopentane-1,3′-Quinazoline]7.68Tricosane, 2-methyl- (CAS) 2-methyltricosane1.702H-Pyran-2-methanol, tetrahydro- (cas) 2-methanol tetrahydropyran1.87Some of the compounds identified for the mushroom powder samples without spices were (1) 1-hexacosanol (cas) hexacosanol-1 (10.97% area), (2) 2-heptanol, 5-ethyl-(cas) 5-ethyl-2-heptanol (8.29% area), (3) 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (15.51% area), and (4) octadecanoic acid (cas) stearic acid (5.81% area). Tagkouli et al. [25] and Selli et al. [26] identified aromatic compounds in fresh Pleurotus ostreatus mushrooms into groups of (1) eight carbon atoms compounds, (2) alcohols, (3) aldehydes, (4) fatty acids (FAME methyl esters), (5) toluene, and (6) ketones. The powdering process causes the volatile components of oyster mushroom powder to be dominated by alcohol, furan, and fatty acids and their derivatives.Gas chromatography can be used to detect compounds that affect the olfactory, as in previous studies [27]. The validity of the test results from the GCMS is influenced by several things, mainly, the calibration of the tool, the accuracy of the test method, and the preparation of materials [28]. Judging from the results obtained in the tested samples (Table 6), the groups of compounds that appeared were mostly ethanol, furans, esters, ethers, fatty acids, and volatile acids. The flavored mushroom powder sample had several compounds identified as (1) 1-allyl-cyclopropane carboxylic acid (10.78% area), (2) 2,6-dihydro-2 h-pyran-2-one (5.76% area), (3) 1-dodecanol (cas) n-dodecanol (8.51% area), (4) ethanol, 2-(dodecyloxy)-(cas) dodecoxyethanol (8.34% area), (5) Hexadecanoic acid (cas) palmitic acid (6.16% area), and (6) 3′,4′-dihydro-2′-(morpholin-4-Yl) (7.68% area). Some compounds with significant area on the GCMS chromatogram for samples (E) 50% flavored mushroom powder and 50% mandai cempedak powder were (1) 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (8.26% area), (2) ethanol, 2-(dodecyloxy)-(cas) dodecoxyethanol (14.01% area), and (3) ethanol, 2-(tetradecyloxy)-(cas) 2-tetradecyloxyethanol (6.99% area).


## 3.6. Color Analysis

The color mapping of a product sample referring to the CIELAB color space is identified by three parameters:L∗, a∗, and b∗. The L∗ represents the brightness from dark (black) to light (white), starting from zero (dark) to 100 (light). In contrast, a∗ is the range with the identification of green (negative a∗) to red (positive a∗) and the b∗ axis is the range with the identification of blue (negative b∗) to yellow (positive b∗) [29]. All formulations had a color tendency similar to that of commercial mushroom powder control referring to the data presented in Table 7, namely, with brightness ranging from 65.68 to 67.06 (tends to be pale), positive a∗ chromatic (tends to red), and positive b∗ chromatic with larger values (tends to strengthen to yellow). The a∗ color chromatic range for all samples and controls of commercial mushroom powders was 4.53–5.83 and b∗ 21.46–22.46. From this data, it can be concluded that the color tendency of the formulation is slightly reddish yellow with a paleness level of around 66–67%.Table 7
Results of color analysis.
CodeSample (flavored mushroom powder:mandai cempedak powder, %)L∗a∗b∗A40 : 6066.285.8321.46B70 : 3066.85.8221.48


## 4. Conclusion

Hedonic quality assessment on seasoning samples of flavored mushroom powder and mandai cempedak powder plays a more critical role in accepting the final product. Seasoning samples with a composition of 60–70% flavored mushroom powder and 30–40% mandai powder had a savory taste which was statistically (p<0.05) not significantly different from the control of commercial mushroom powder. All seasoning formulations of flavored mushroom and mandai cempedak powder have a moisture content of 8.4–10.9%, total protein 7.0–9.0%, soluble protein 2.4–3.5%, ash content 4.5–19.2%, fat content 2.3–4.5%, carbohydrates 62.7–79.4%, and the solubility is 31.0–89.4%. Samples of 50% mushroom spice powder and 50% mandai cempedak powder had the dominant amino acid profiles of ileusine (1.46%, w/w), glutamate (1.37%), methionine (0.82%), and aspartic acid (0.72%), as well as volatile compounds. In addition, the formula had dominant heptanone, dodecoxyethanol, and etradecyloxyethanol with a pleasant aroma profile, pungent fruity, green, citrus, and herbal. The color tendency of the entire formulation is slightly reddish yellow with a paleness level of about 66–67%.



---

*Source: 3092246-2022-07-07.xml*