# Large-Scale Shopping Mall Architectural Design Based on Intelligent BIM Technology

Authors: Yuan Zhou; Ibrahim Mishaal
Journal: Security and Communication Networks
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

In this paper, limit analysis method and limit analysis finite element method are used to study the stability of large-scale shopping mall building structure. Moreover, this paper combines data analysis to verify the algorithm analysis process of this paper and uses statistical methods to verify that the algorithm proposed in this paper is applicable to the architectural design of large shopping malls. Furthermore, this work uses BIM and finite element technologies to test the usefulness of this strategy by simulating the shopping mall design process. The experimental research shows that the large-scale shopping mall architectural design model proposed in this paper, which is based on intelligent BIM technology, has a good large-scale shopping mall architectural design effect as well as a large-scale shopping mall architectural structure analysis effect.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The architectural layout, spatial form, and environmental atmosphere of public buildings are constantly changing. Nowadays, public buildings have gradually become the main place for handling business activities and gradually become the basis of social production with the progress of society. In order to meet this development demand, public buildings need to be diversified in form and function. In particular, the rapid development of social informatization in recent years has accelerated the speed of this change. There have been many large-scale multistory public buildings such as comprehensive shopping malls and large supermarkets, such as Carrefour supermarket, Wanda shopping mall, and Wal-Mart supermarket. These buildings are highly comprehensive in terms of function and generally cover underground parking lots, above-ground shopping malls, cinemas, restaurants, etc., and generally require larger column grids, higher stories, and open spaces. Therefore, the choice of the structural system has a greater impact on the cost. In most cases, the structural form of these buildings will choose a reinforced concrete frame structure. Although this structure uses a lot of steel and cement, its cost is higher than that of other hybrid structures. It has the qualities of employing beams and columns to support the weight, with the walls serving solely as a means of separation and enclosure, allowing for more flexibility in the design of rooms, as well as the size and form of doors and windows. The designer may make maximum use of the building’s space according to the specifications and readily meet the various needs of the consumers. As a result, reinforced concrete frame structures are often used for multistory and large-story public buildings. The lateral rigidity of the building, however, is poor because of the high story and vast span. In order to achieve the side shift criteria, it is often essential to expand the cross-sectional dimensions of the beam and column, which increases the structure’s cost and compromises the use function.The business environment is mostly related to the market survey of business planning, involving many issues such as economic environment and living structure, urban structure and urban development planning, business development planning and policies, customer consumption behavior, regional retail industry structure and market conditions, regional competition relationships, the supply of future commercial real estate, and the infrastructure of the area where the business is located [1]. The analysis results of this type of investigation should be given by the project planning document or design task book. The project environment has an important impact on the location of the shopping mall and has a certain impact on the design of the shopping mall. Moreover, architects need to pay attention to the project environment of shopping mall construction [2]. For shopping malls, there is a saying of “one step and three cities,” and a small difference in location will result in a loss of performance by thousands of miles. It can be seen that the importance of “situation” in shopping malls is self-evident. The so-called “site force” in the narrow sense refers to the site selection conditions of the shopping mall, and in the broad sense, it refers to the shopping mall project environment. The project environment refers to the collection of various subjective and objective conditions that restrict the existence of shopping malls. It includes the geographic environment of shopping mall site selection, commercial project planning influencing factors on design, various policy norms and constraints of urban planning, and commercial environment of shopping mall operation, traffic environment, and urban context [3].In order to improve the design effect of large-scale shopping malls, this paper combines BIM technology and finite element analysis algorithms to improve the smart shopping mall design system and uses experimental research to verify the model of this paper, which provides a theoretical reference for subsequent large-scale shopping mall architectural design.


## 2. Related Work

The frame shear wall construction was improved and compared in the literature [4]. The stiffness ratio between the frame and the shear wall was chosen as the design variable, the least horizontal seismic load was chosen as the objective function, and the maximum interstory angular displacement and the maximum interstory angular displacement were chosen as the design variables. The two characteristics of shear wall stiffness that are not equal to zero are employed as constraints, and a mathematical model for structural optimization is created. The author solves the optimal stiffness ratio by running the program and then uses the calculation formula of the stiffness ratio to convert the stiffness ratio into the number and thickness of the shear walls. The conclusion is that the greater the number of shear walls, the greater the seismic performance of the structure. It will be improved, and each structure has the most appropriate number of shear walls; when general shear walls are arranged in the structure, a certain number of short-leg shear walls are arranged at the same time to make them work together, which is more conducive to the seismic resistance of the structure. Reference [5] conducted an optimization study on the frame shear wall structure under horizontal earthquakes. In the article, the optimal stiffness characteristic interval was discussed, and the optimization model was established to make the structure when the maximum interstory displacement angle meets the specified limit of the code. The effect is minimal, and a set of optimization programs have been written in computer language. Through calculation and analysis of examples, the stiffness of shear wall and building height, structural self-weight, total number of layers of the structure, site characteristic period, maximum horizontal earthquake influence coefficient, and elastic interlayer are calculated and analyzed. The relationship between the displacement angle limit and the period reduction coefficient of nonbearing walls is considered, and the basic natural vibration period of the structure is used to verify the rationality of the calculated number of shear walls. Literature [6] optimized the lateral stiffness of the concrete frame shear wall structure, analyzed how the frame and the shear wall work together, obtained the expressions of internal force and displacement, and proposed a solution for the optimal stiffness of the structure The method of eigenvalue, then derives the expression of the optimal stiffness of the shear wall on the basis of the displacement limit of the structure vertex. The elastoplastic performance of the short-leg shear wall was investigated and researched in the literature [7]. The elastoplastic rod element with a stiff domain mimics the connecting beam of the short-leg shear wall using the equivalent frame method’s finite element model. The elastoplastic analysis of the short-leg shear wall is also performed, taking into account the influence of shear deformation. The limb strength coefficient, the integrity coefficient, the flange width, and the reinforcement ratio of the connecting beam, among other factors, are studied throughout the analysis. The impact of these variables on the short-limb shear wall’s elastoplastic performance is explored. Literature [8] carried out an experimental study on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete short-leg shear walls, performing low-cycle repeated loading tests on specimens, observing and studying the seismic performance of reinforced concrete short-leg shear walls, and comparing them to ordinary shear walls. Compared. Literature [9] analyzed the parameters of the reinforced concrete frame short-leg shear wall structure, using dynamic and static elastoplastic analysis methods, and it studied the axial compression ratio, the longitudinal reinforcement ratio of the short-leg wall, and the wall under rare earthquakes and the influence of the main section height thickness ratio and other parameters on the seismic performance of the structure is analyzed. It is concluded that increasing the reinforcement ratio of the shear wall will increase the cost, but the seismic capacity of the structure will be significantly increased, and the ductility will also be enhanced; compared with the ordinary shear wall, the height thickness ratio of the short leg shear wall section decreases. If it is reduced, the yield stiffness reduction factor of the structure is increased, and the ductility is better, but the bearing capacity is reduced and the side shift is also increased. Reference [10] conducted a study on the stiffness optimization of reinforced concrete shear wall structure based on seismic response spectrum. The article established a finite element model of a sixteen-story shear wall structure with controlled deformation as a constraint condition, and the thickness of the shear wall was used as a design variable. The light structure as the objective function is taken for optimization. After optimization, the bottom and internal stresses become higher, and concentrated stress occurs in the corners, the middle roof, and the open shear wall. The seismic effect of the structure and the floor slab with the maximum displacement angle are in the middle of the structure, and whiplash appears on the top of the structure. Tip effect. Literature [11] analyzes the shape control factors of the overall optimization design of the high-rise frame shear wall structure. Starting from the basic theory of structural optimization design and shape control factors, it introduces the characteristics and control of the optimization control factors of the high-rise frame-shear wall structure. Research and analysis show that structural system, building height, building plane aspect ratio, and vertical aspect ratio play an important role in structural optimization. Literature [12] conducted experimental research and numerical analysis on steel plate shear walls with only beam single-plate webs (SSW-BO) and found that using HYS mesh plates in SSW-BO is an effective solution to compensate for low shear capacity and low energy consumption due to separation from the steel plate. In addition, the finite element software ABAQUS has studied the performance of SSW-BO through nonlinear analysis, and the final experimental results are compared with the numerical results, showing good consistency. Literature [13] uses STAAD-Pro software to analyze the three-dimensional model of reinforced concrete frame structure resisting several specific external forces. Through the analysis model, it is found that the shear force of the shear wall starts to affect the shear wall frame and the inner frame at 50% of the building height. The horizontal shear distribution between the two produces a marginal effect, but the building height still plays an important role in the interstory shear distribution.


## 3. Research on Shopping Mall Building Stability Based on Limit Analysis Method

This paper proposes a new model of shopping mall building stability analysis based on the discrete mechanism (“point generating point” mechanism). Then, based on the upper limit method of limit analysis, this paper proposes an analytical formula for calculating the support force to be sought. After that, this paper compares the results of this section with the previous research results to verify the accuracy of the model proposed in this section. Finally, this article examines and discusses the impact of numerous influencing characteristics (such as geometry and material parameters) on shopping mall stability.The discrete mechanism is utilised to build the corner failure mechanism in order to investigate the stability of the circular tunnel’s face. Since its introduction, the discrete mechanism has been extensively employed to tackle stability issues in a variety of engineering constructions.This section will first propose a new destruction mechanism based on the discrete mechanism. It can be seen from Figure1 that Pi is a point on the lower sliding surface of the newly proposed failure mechanism, θi is the angle between the line OPi and the straight direction, and dθ is the angle between the line OPi and OPi+1. When rA and θA are known, the coordinates of the rotation center O can be expressed as follows [14]:(1)xo=−rAcosθA,yo=rAsinθA.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the new destruction mechanism.It can be seen from Figure1 that the key point of the new failure mechanism generation is to solve the failure sliding surface Pi+1 under the premise of the known point Pi coordinate. Figure 1 shows the process of solving Pi+1 with a known Pi coordinate.It can be seen from Figure2 that v⟶i=xv,yvv is the unit speed of the point Pi around the center of rotation O, and n⟶i=xni,yni is the unit normal vector of the microsegment PiPi+1. According to Figure 2, the unit speed of point Pi can be expressed as follows [15]:(2)xvi=−sinθi,yvi=cosθi.Figure 2
Schematic diagram of generating point P(i+1) from point P(i).According to the Mohr–Coulomb fluidity law, the angle between the unit velocity of pointPi and the unit normal vector of the microsegment PiPi+1 is π/2+φi. Therefore, according to the Mohr–Coulomb fluidity rule, the unit normal vector of the microsegment PiPi+1 can be obtained as follows:(3)xni=−cosθi+φi,yni=−sinθi+φi.Sincen⟶i=xn,yn is the unit normal vector of the microsegment PiPi+1, the following relationship can be obtained:(4)ni⟶PiO⟶+OP⟶i+1=0.In order to solve the coordinate ofPi+1, this section will express OPi+1 as the following form:(5)OP⟶i+1=λi+1δi+1⟶.λi+1 indicates the length of OPi+1 which can be expressed as follows:(6)λi+1=xnix0−xi+yniy0−yixnicosθi+1+ynisinθi+1.Combining the above equations, the expression of pointPi+1 can be known as follows:(7)xi+1=x0−λi+1cosθi+1,yi+1=y0−λi+1sinθi+1.Substituting formula (6) into formula (7), the Pi+1 expression can be obtained as follows [16]:(8)xi+1=x0−xnix0−xi+yniy0−yixnicosθi+1+ynisinθi+1cosθi+1,yi+1=y0−xnix0−xi+yniy0−yixnicosθi+1+ynisinθi+1sinθi+1.It can be seen from Figure2 that when the generated point Pi+1 exceeds the line AC, the coordinates of point C of the mall building destruction mechanism generated by the discrete mechanism can be obtained according to the linear calculation method, and the expression is as follows:(9)xC=xn−yn−dxn−xn−1yn−yn−1,yC=b.The failure planesCE and CE are assumed to be lines with an angle φ0 from the vertical direction (see Figure 1). It can be seen from formulas (1) and (9) that when the geometric parameters rA and θA are known, a new failure mode of shopping mall buildings can be obtained.The ultimate sustaining force of shopping malls may be addressed using the virtual work concept of the upper limit technique of limit analysis when the discrete mechanism is utilised to develop new failure modes for shopping malls. The final support force of the mall structure may be calculated using the relationship between total internal power and total dissipated power acting on the slip surface. It can be seen from Figure1 that the external forces acting on the failure mode of a shopping mall building include supporting forces q1 and q2 (Figure 1), soil gravity in the failure mode, and ground load. The solution process is as follows [17].


### 3.1. Internal Power

#### 3.1.1. Supporting Forceq1 and q2 Power

The power of supporting force q1 can be solved as follows:(10)Wq1=∬Σq1⋅vd∑=12ωq1⋅rA2cosθAcosθB2−1.The power of supporting force q2 can be expressed as follows:(11)Wq2=−q2bv0.Here,v0 represents the speed of the broken block CC′E′E (due to the symmetry of the broken block CC′E′E, it can be known that the direction of the broken block’s speed is straight downward).Therefore, the total power of the available supporting forcesq1 and q2 is [18](12)Wq=−q2bv0+12ωq1rA2cosθAcosθB2−1.We assumeq1=Kq2, and equation (12) is expressed as the following form:(13)Wq=−q2bv0+K2ωq2rA2cosθAcosθB2−1.In this section, when analyzing the stability of shopping malls, we only consider the case ofK=1.


#### 3.1.2. Power per Soil Weight

The power of some unit soil weight under the new damage mechanism constructed in this section can be expressed as follows:(14)Wγ1=∭Vγ⟶⋅v⟶dV=ω∑i=1nγRiSicosθi.Among them, there are(15)Ri=xB+xi+xi+13−xo2+yB+yi+yi+13−yo2,(16)Si=12⋅xByi−xiyB+xiyi+1−xi+1yi+xi+1yB−xByi+1.The power of part of the unit soil weight on the new damage mechanism constructed in this section can be expressed as follows:(17)Wγ2=12γSCCEEv0.Here,v0 represents the speed of the broken block CC′E′E (due to the symmetry of the broken block CC′E′E, it can be known that the direction of the speed of the broken block is straight downward).Combining formula (14) and (17), the power per unit weight of the soil in the final damage mechanism can be expressed as follows:(18)Wγ=ω∑i=1nγRiSicosθi+12γSCCEEv0.


### 3.2. Power Dissipation

It can be seen from Figure2 that the total power dissipation along the slip surface includes the power dissipation along the slip surface AC (or A′C′) and the power dissipation along the slip surface CE (or C′E′). Among them, the power dissipation along the slip surface AC is(19)WD1=∬Scv⟶cosφdS=ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri⋅Si.Among them, there are(20)Ri=xi+xi+12−x02+yi+yi+12−y02,Si=xi−xi+122+yi−yi+122.The power dissipation along the slip surfaceCE can be expressed as follows [19]:(21)WD2=cCE/2v0LCEcosφCE/2.Here,cCE/2 represents the cohesive force in the middle of the slip surface CE, φCE/2 represents the friction angle in the middle of the slip surface CE, LCE represents the length of the slip surface CE, and v0 represents the speed of the broken block CC′E′E (due to the symmetry of the broken block CC′E′E, it can be seen that the speed direction of the broken block is straight downward).The total power dissipation can be calculated by equations (19) and (21).Finally, the ultimate supporting force on the surrounding rock of the mall building can be solved as follows:(22)Wc=Wγ+Wq1+Wq2.This section discusses the influence of heterogeneous geotechnical parameters on the stability of surrounding rocks of shopping mall buildings. Figure3 shows the schematic diagram of the ultimate supporting force q (q1 = q2) with the variation of the heterogeneous friction angle. Figure 3 shows how the final sustaining force decreases as the ground friction angle increases. When the ground friction angle is considerable, the final sustaining force drops practically linearly as the ground friction angle increases. In addition, it can be seen from Figure 3 that as the heterogeneity coefficient λφ increases, the ultimate supporting force value also gradually decreases. Moreover, when the ground friction angle is small, the limit supporting force changes more obviously with the increase of the heterogeneity coefficient λφ. The above discussion shows that the nonhomogeneous friction angle coefficient has a non-negligible influence on the ultimate supporting force, and ignoring the influence of the heterogeneous friction angle coefficient λφ on the ultimate supporting force will result in inaccurate results. Therefore, considering the heterogeneous friction angle can better assess the stability of shopping malls [20].Figure 3
The influence of the heterogeneous internal friction angle on the ultimate supporting forceq.The impact of heterogeneous rock-soil cohesion on the stability of surrounding rock of shopping mall structures is discussed in this section. Figure4 depicts the change in the limit sustaining force q as a function of the heterogeneous cohesive force. Figure 4 shows that when the ground cohesiveness increases, the final sustaining force reduces linearly. Figure 4 clearly shows that when the heterogeneity coefficient c increases, the limit support force value lowers. The preceding explanation demonstrates that the coefficient of heterogeneous cohesion c has a significant impact on the eventual sustaining force, and that disregarding this influence would result in erroneous findings. Therefore, considering the heterogeneous cohesion can better evaluate the stability of shopping malls [21].Figure 4
The influence of heterogeneous cohesion on the ultimate supporting forceq.The double helix failure mechanism is used to study the stability of the face of a circular tunnel. Since the double helix mechanism was proposed, this method has been widely used to solve many stability problems of engineering structures (the stability of tunnels and slopes).Figure5 shows the traditional double helix damage mechanism. The expression of the traditional double helix damage mechanism can be expressed as follows:(23)AC:r=rAeθ−θAtanφ,BD:r=rBeθB−θtanφ.Figure 5
Traditional double helix destruction mechanism.This mechanism can be used to evaluate the stability of the excavation surface of the low space of a shopping mall building under the condition of homogeneous soil (with and without considering seepage) and to solve the ultimate support pressure acting on the excavation surface. This damage mechanism, however, cannot be employed to investigate the impact of heterogeneous soil on the excavation surface of a retail mall’s low-level area. As a result, the classic double helix failure mechanism has a limited utility in geotechnical engineering. This section suggests an enhanced new active destruction process based on the “point spawning point” technique as a result of this (Figure6). It can be seen from Figure 6 that the focus of the new failure mechanism generat“on is to solve the fa”lure sliding surface Pi+1 (or P′i+1) under the premise of the known coordinates of the point Pi (or P′i). Based on the traditional double helix failure model and the “point generation” mechanism, based on the known coordinates of point Pi (or P′i+1), the expression process for solving the failure sliding surface Pi+1 (or P′i+1) is proposed as follows.Figure 6
Destruction mechanism based on “point spawning point.”First, whenrA and θA are known, the coordinates of the rotation center O point can be expressed as follows:(24)xo=−rAcosθA,yo=rAsinθA.According to the double helix formula and the value of the angledθ between the line PiO (or P′iO) and the line Pi+1O (or P′i+1O), the distance ri+1 (or ri+1′) between point Pi+1 (or P′i) and point O can be obtained, and the expression can be solved as follows [22]:(25)AC:ri+1=rieθi+1−θitanφi,BD:ri+1′=ri′eθi′−θi+1′tanφi.According to the value of the distanceri+1 (or ri+1′) between point Pi+1 (or P′i+1) and point O and the angle θi+1 (or θi+1′) between line Pi+1O (or line P′i+1O) and the straight direction, the coordinate expression of the point Pi+1 (or P′i+1) can be obtained as follows:(26)xi+1=ri+1sinθi+1+xo,yi+1=ri+1cosθi+1.Alternatively, it is(27)xi+1′=ri+1′sinθi+1′+xo,yi+1′=ri+1′cosθi+1′.In addition, the coordinates of pointC can be obtained by combining equations (23) to (27). It is worth noting that when i=1, ri=rA,∈ri′=rB,θi=θA and θi′=θB′. The algorithm uses straight lines to connect the obtained points in sequence to obtain the constructed new active destruction mechanism.When the new failure mode of the excavation surface of the low space of the shopping mall building is generated, according to the virtual work principle of the limit analysis upper limit method, the limit support force acting on the excavation surface of the low space of the shopping mall building can be solved. The connection between the total internal force power and the total dissipation power operating on the slip surface may be used to calculate the final sustaining force acting on the excavation surface of the low space of a shopping mall construction. Supporting forceq, soil gravity in the failure model, and ground load are examples of external forces acting on the failure mode of the excavation surface in subterranean space. The solution process is as follows.


### 3.3. Solving Internal Force Power

#### 3.3.1. Supporting Forceq Power

The power of the supporting forceq acting on the excavation surface of the low space of the shopping mall building can be solved as follows:(28)Wq=∬Σq⋅vd∑=12ωq⋅rA2cosθAcosθB2−1.


#### 3.3.2. Upper Heavyγ Power

The damage mechanism is divided horizontally to find the power per unit soil weightγ. The power per unit soil weight of the new damage mechanism constructed in this section can be expressed as follows:(29)Wγ=∭Vγ⟶⋅v⟶dV=ω∑i=1nγRiSicosθi.Here,Ri represents the distance from the center of gravity of each i-th horizontal bar to point O, and Si represents the area of each i-th horizontal bar.In addition, based on assumptions, this section does not consider the impact of ground load on the ultimate support pressure during the analysis of the stability of the excavation surface in the low space of the shopping mall building. Therefore, this section will not discuss the influence of ground load on the ultimate supporting force acting on the excavation surface of the low space of the shopping mall building.


### 3.4. Solving the Total Power Dissipation

The dissipated power is the power generated by the cohesive force along the failure mode slip surface. It can be seen from Figure6 that the total dissipated power includes the power dissipated along AC and along BC, and the expressions are as follows:Among them, the power dissipation along the slip surface AC is(30)WD1=∬Scv⟶cosφdS=ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri⋅Li.Among them, there are(31)Ri=xi+xi+12−x02+yi+yi+12−y02,Li=xi−xi+12+yi−yi+12.Among them, the power dissipation along the slip surfaceBC is(32)WD2=∬Scv⟶cosφdS=ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri′⋅Li′.Among them, there are(33)Ri′=xi′+xi+1′2−x02+yi′+yi+1′2−y02,(34)Li′=xi′−xi+1′2+yi′−yi+1′2.Therefore, the total power dissipation can be expressed as the following form:(35)WD=ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri⋅Li+ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri′⋅Li′.


### 3.5. Solving the Ultimate Supporting Force

According to the upper limit method of limit analysis, it can be known that the total power of internal force is equal to the total power of dissipation. Combining equations (28) to (35), the expression of the ultimate supporting force of the excavation surface in the low space of the shopping mall building can be obtained as follows:(36)q=ω∑i=1nγRiSicosθi−ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri⋅Li+ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri′⋅Li′1/2ωrA2cosθA/cosθB2−1.This section discusses the influence of heterogeneous rock and soil parameters on the stability of surrounding rock in square underground spaces. Figure7 shows a schematic diagram of the change of q/γD with the heterogeneous friction angle. It can be seen from Figure 7 that as the ground friction angle increases, q/γD gradually decreases. When the ground friction angle is larger, q/γD changes smaller and smaller with the increase of the ground friction angle. In addition, it can be seen from Figure 7 that as the heterogeneity coefficient λφ increases, the rate at which q/γD decreases gradually decreases. However, when the ground friction angle is small, q/γD changes significantly with the increase of the heterogeneity coefficient λφ. The foregoing explanation demonstrates that the nonhomogeneous friction angle coefficient has a significant impact on the eventual supporting force, and that disregarding this impact would result in erroneous findings. Therefore, considering the heterogeneous friction angle can better evaluate the stability of shopping malls.Figure 7
The influence of heterogeneous internal friction angle on the stability of excavated surface.Figure8 shows a schematic diagram of q/γD changing with heterogeneous cohesion. It can be seen from Figure 8 that as the ground friction angle increases, q/γD decreases linearly. In addition, it can be seen from Figure 8 that as the heterogeneity coefficient λc increases, q/γD also gradually decreases. The above discussion shows that the nonhomogeneous friction angle coefficient has a non-negligible influence on the ultimate supporting force, and ignoring the influence of the heterogeneous cohesion coefficient λc on the ultimate supporting force will result in inaccurate results. Therefore, considering the heterogeneous cohesion can better evaluate the stability of shopping malls.Figure 8
The influence of heterogeneous cohesion on the stability of excavated face.


## 3.1. Internal Power

### 3.1.1. Supporting Forceq1 and q2 Power

The power of supporting force q1 can be solved as follows:(10)Wq1=∬Σq1⋅vd∑=12ωq1⋅rA2cosθAcosθB2−1.The power of supporting force q2 can be expressed as follows:(11)Wq2=−q2bv0.Here,v0 represents the speed of the broken block CC′E′E (due to the symmetry of the broken block CC′E′E, it can be known that the direction of the broken block’s speed is straight downward).Therefore, the total power of the available supporting forcesq1 and q2 is [18](12)Wq=−q2bv0+12ωq1rA2cosθAcosθB2−1.We assumeq1=Kq2, and equation (12) is expressed as the following form:(13)Wq=−q2bv0+K2ωq2rA2cosθAcosθB2−1.In this section, when analyzing the stability of shopping malls, we only consider the case ofK=1.


### 3.1.2. Power per Soil Weight

The power of some unit soil weight under the new damage mechanism constructed in this section can be expressed as follows:(14)Wγ1=∭Vγ⟶⋅v⟶dV=ω∑i=1nγRiSicosθi.Among them, there are(15)Ri=xB+xi+xi+13−xo2+yB+yi+yi+13−yo2,(16)Si=12⋅xByi−xiyB+xiyi+1−xi+1yi+xi+1yB−xByi+1.The power of part of the unit soil weight on the new damage mechanism constructed in this section can be expressed as follows:(17)Wγ2=12γSCCEEv0.Here,v0 represents the speed of the broken block CC′E′E (due to the symmetry of the broken block CC′E′E, it can be known that the direction of the speed of the broken block is straight downward).Combining formula (14) and (17), the power per unit weight of the soil in the final damage mechanism can be expressed as follows:(18)Wγ=ω∑i=1nγRiSicosθi+12γSCCEEv0.


## 3.1.1. Supporting Forceq1 and q2 Power

The power of supporting force q1 can be solved as follows:(10)Wq1=∬Σq1⋅vd∑=12ωq1⋅rA2cosθAcosθB2−1.The power of supporting force q2 can be expressed as follows:(11)Wq2=−q2bv0.Here,v0 represents the speed of the broken block CC′E′E (due to the symmetry of the broken block CC′E′E, it can be known that the direction of the broken block’s speed is straight downward).Therefore, the total power of the available supporting forcesq1 and q2 is [18](12)Wq=−q2bv0+12ωq1rA2cosθAcosθB2−1.We assumeq1=Kq2, and equation (12) is expressed as the following form:(13)Wq=−q2bv0+K2ωq2rA2cosθAcosθB2−1.In this section, when analyzing the stability of shopping malls, we only consider the case ofK=1.


## 3.1.2. Power per Soil Weight

The power of some unit soil weight under the new damage mechanism constructed in this section can be expressed as follows:(14)Wγ1=∭Vγ⟶⋅v⟶dV=ω∑i=1nγRiSicosθi.Among them, there are(15)Ri=xB+xi+xi+13−xo2+yB+yi+yi+13−yo2,(16)Si=12⋅xByi−xiyB+xiyi+1−xi+1yi+xi+1yB−xByi+1.The power of part of the unit soil weight on the new damage mechanism constructed in this section can be expressed as follows:(17)Wγ2=12γSCCEEv0.Here,v0 represents the speed of the broken block CC′E′E (due to the symmetry of the broken block CC′E′E, it can be known that the direction of the speed of the broken block is straight downward).Combining formula (14) and (17), the power per unit weight of the soil in the final damage mechanism can be expressed as follows:(18)Wγ=ω∑i=1nγRiSicosθi+12γSCCEEv0.


## 3.2. Power Dissipation

It can be seen from Figure2 that the total power dissipation along the slip surface includes the power dissipation along the slip surface AC (or A′C′) and the power dissipation along the slip surface CE (or C′E′). Among them, the power dissipation along the slip surface AC is(19)WD1=∬Scv⟶cosφdS=ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri⋅Si.Among them, there are(20)Ri=xi+xi+12−x02+yi+yi+12−y02,Si=xi−xi+122+yi−yi+122.The power dissipation along the slip surfaceCE can be expressed as follows [19]:(21)WD2=cCE/2v0LCEcosφCE/2.Here,cCE/2 represents the cohesive force in the middle of the slip surface CE, φCE/2 represents the friction angle in the middle of the slip surface CE, LCE represents the length of the slip surface CE, and v0 represents the speed of the broken block CC′E′E (due to the symmetry of the broken block CC′E′E, it can be seen that the speed direction of the broken block is straight downward).The total power dissipation can be calculated by equations (19) and (21).Finally, the ultimate supporting force on the surrounding rock of the mall building can be solved as follows:(22)Wc=Wγ+Wq1+Wq2.This section discusses the influence of heterogeneous geotechnical parameters on the stability of surrounding rocks of shopping mall buildings. Figure3 shows the schematic diagram of the ultimate supporting force q (q1 = q2) with the variation of the heterogeneous friction angle. Figure 3 shows how the final sustaining force decreases as the ground friction angle increases. When the ground friction angle is considerable, the final sustaining force drops practically linearly as the ground friction angle increases. In addition, it can be seen from Figure 3 that as the heterogeneity coefficient λφ increases, the ultimate supporting force value also gradually decreases. Moreover, when the ground friction angle is small, the limit supporting force changes more obviously with the increase of the heterogeneity coefficient λφ. The above discussion shows that the nonhomogeneous friction angle coefficient has a non-negligible influence on the ultimate supporting force, and ignoring the influence of the heterogeneous friction angle coefficient λφ on the ultimate supporting force will result in inaccurate results. Therefore, considering the heterogeneous friction angle can better assess the stability of shopping malls [20].Figure 3
The influence of the heterogeneous internal friction angle on the ultimate supporting forceq.The impact of heterogeneous rock-soil cohesion on the stability of surrounding rock of shopping mall structures is discussed in this section. Figure4 depicts the change in the limit sustaining force q as a function of the heterogeneous cohesive force. Figure 4 shows that when the ground cohesiveness increases, the final sustaining force reduces linearly. Figure 4 clearly shows that when the heterogeneity coefficient c increases, the limit support force value lowers. The preceding explanation demonstrates that the coefficient of heterogeneous cohesion c has a significant impact on the eventual sustaining force, and that disregarding this influence would result in erroneous findings. Therefore, considering the heterogeneous cohesion can better evaluate the stability of shopping malls [21].Figure 4
The influence of heterogeneous cohesion on the ultimate supporting forceq.The double helix failure mechanism is used to study the stability of the face of a circular tunnel. Since the double helix mechanism was proposed, this method has been widely used to solve many stability problems of engineering structures (the stability of tunnels and slopes).Figure5 shows the traditional double helix damage mechanism. The expression of the traditional double helix damage mechanism can be expressed as follows:(23)AC:r=rAeθ−θAtanφ,BD:r=rBeθB−θtanφ.Figure 5
Traditional double helix destruction mechanism.This mechanism can be used to evaluate the stability of the excavation surface of the low space of a shopping mall building under the condition of homogeneous soil (with and without considering seepage) and to solve the ultimate support pressure acting on the excavation surface. This damage mechanism, however, cannot be employed to investigate the impact of heterogeneous soil on the excavation surface of a retail mall’s low-level area. As a result, the classic double helix failure mechanism has a limited utility in geotechnical engineering. This section suggests an enhanced new active destruction process based on the “point spawning point” technique as a result of this (Figure6). It can be seen from Figure 6 that the focus of the new failure mechanism generat“on is to solve the fa”lure sliding surface Pi+1 (or P′i+1) under the premise of the known coordinates of the point Pi (or P′i). Based on the traditional double helix failure model and the “point generation” mechanism, based on the known coordinates of point Pi (or P′i+1), the expression process for solving the failure sliding surface Pi+1 (or P′i+1) is proposed as follows.Figure 6
Destruction mechanism based on “point spawning point.”First, whenrA and θA are known, the coordinates of the rotation center O point can be expressed as follows:(24)xo=−rAcosθA,yo=rAsinθA.According to the double helix formula and the value of the angledθ between the line PiO (or P′iO) and the line Pi+1O (or P′i+1O), the distance ri+1 (or ri+1′) between point Pi+1 (or P′i) and point O can be obtained, and the expression can be solved as follows [22]:(25)AC:ri+1=rieθi+1−θitanφi,BD:ri+1′=ri′eθi′−θi+1′tanφi.According to the value of the distanceri+1 (or ri+1′) between point Pi+1 (or P′i+1) and point O and the angle θi+1 (or θi+1′) between line Pi+1O (or line P′i+1O) and the straight direction, the coordinate expression of the point Pi+1 (or P′i+1) can be obtained as follows:(26)xi+1=ri+1sinθi+1+xo,yi+1=ri+1cosθi+1.Alternatively, it is(27)xi+1′=ri+1′sinθi+1′+xo,yi+1′=ri+1′cosθi+1′.In addition, the coordinates of pointC can be obtained by combining equations (23) to (27). It is worth noting that when i=1, ri=rA,∈ri′=rB,θi=θA and θi′=θB′. The algorithm uses straight lines to connect the obtained points in sequence to obtain the constructed new active destruction mechanism.When the new failure mode of the excavation surface of the low space of the shopping mall building is generated, according to the virtual work principle of the limit analysis upper limit method, the limit support force acting on the excavation surface of the low space of the shopping mall building can be solved. The connection between the total internal force power and the total dissipation power operating on the slip surface may be used to calculate the final sustaining force acting on the excavation surface of the low space of a shopping mall construction. Supporting forceq, soil gravity in the failure model, and ground load are examples of external forces acting on the failure mode of the excavation surface in subterranean space. The solution process is as follows.


## 3.3. Solving Internal Force Power

### 3.3.1. Supporting Forceq Power

The power of the supporting forceq acting on the excavation surface of the low space of the shopping mall building can be solved as follows:(28)Wq=∬Σq⋅vd∑=12ωq⋅rA2cosθAcosθB2−1.


### 3.3.2. Upper Heavyγ Power

The damage mechanism is divided horizontally to find the power per unit soil weightγ. The power per unit soil weight of the new damage mechanism constructed in this section can be expressed as follows:(29)Wγ=∭Vγ⟶⋅v⟶dV=ω∑i=1nγRiSicosθi.Here,Ri represents the distance from the center of gravity of each i-th horizontal bar to point O, and Si represents the area of each i-th horizontal bar.In addition, based on assumptions, this section does not consider the impact of ground load on the ultimate support pressure during the analysis of the stability of the excavation surface in the low space of the shopping mall building. Therefore, this section will not discuss the influence of ground load on the ultimate supporting force acting on the excavation surface of the low space of the shopping mall building.


## 3.3.1. Supporting Forceq Power

The power of the supporting forceq acting on the excavation surface of the low space of the shopping mall building can be solved as follows:(28)Wq=∬Σq⋅vd∑=12ωq⋅rA2cosθAcosθB2−1.


## 3.3.2. Upper Heavyγ Power

The damage mechanism is divided horizontally to find the power per unit soil weightγ. The power per unit soil weight of the new damage mechanism constructed in this section can be expressed as follows:(29)Wγ=∭Vγ⟶⋅v⟶dV=ω∑i=1nγRiSicosθi.Here,Ri represents the distance from the center of gravity of each i-th horizontal bar to point O, and Si represents the area of each i-th horizontal bar.In addition, based on assumptions, this section does not consider the impact of ground load on the ultimate support pressure during the analysis of the stability of the excavation surface in the low space of the shopping mall building. Therefore, this section will not discuss the influence of ground load on the ultimate supporting force acting on the excavation surface of the low space of the shopping mall building.


## 3.4. Solving the Total Power Dissipation

The dissipated power is the power generated by the cohesive force along the failure mode slip surface. It can be seen from Figure6 that the total dissipated power includes the power dissipated along AC and along BC, and the expressions are as follows:Among them, the power dissipation along the slip surface AC is(30)WD1=∬Scv⟶cosφdS=ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri⋅Li.Among them, there are(31)Ri=xi+xi+12−x02+yi+yi+12−y02,Li=xi−xi+12+yi−yi+12.Among them, the power dissipation along the slip surfaceBC is(32)WD2=∬Scv⟶cosφdS=ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri′⋅Li′.Among them, there are(33)Ri′=xi′+xi+1′2−x02+yi′+yi+1′2−y02,(34)Li′=xi′−xi+1′2+yi′−yi+1′2.Therefore, the total power dissipation can be expressed as the following form:(35)WD=ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri⋅Li+ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri′⋅Li′.


## 3.5. Solving the Ultimate Supporting Force

According to the upper limit method of limit analysis, it can be known that the total power of internal force is equal to the total power of dissipation. Combining equations (28) to (35), the expression of the ultimate supporting force of the excavation surface in the low space of the shopping mall building can be obtained as follows:(36)q=ω∑i=1nγRiSicosθi−ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri⋅Li+ω∑i=1nci⋅cosφi⋅Ri′⋅Li′1/2ωrA2cosθA/cosθB2−1.This section discusses the influence of heterogeneous rock and soil parameters on the stability of surrounding rock in square underground spaces. Figure7 shows a schematic diagram of the change of q/γD with the heterogeneous friction angle. It can be seen from Figure 7 that as the ground friction angle increases, q/γD gradually decreases. When the ground friction angle is larger, q/γD changes smaller and smaller with the increase of the ground friction angle. In addition, it can be seen from Figure 7 that as the heterogeneity coefficient λφ increases, the rate at which q/γD decreases gradually decreases. However, when the ground friction angle is small, q/γD changes significantly with the increase of the heterogeneity coefficient λφ. The foregoing explanation demonstrates that the nonhomogeneous friction angle coefficient has a significant impact on the eventual supporting force, and that disregarding this impact would result in erroneous findings. Therefore, considering the heterogeneous friction angle can better evaluate the stability of shopping malls.Figure 7
The influence of heterogeneous internal friction angle on the stability of excavated surface.Figure8 shows a schematic diagram of q/γD changing with heterogeneous cohesion. It can be seen from Figure 8 that as the ground friction angle increases, q/γD decreases linearly. In addition, it can be seen from Figure 8 that as the heterogeneity coefficient λc increases, q/γD also gradually decreases. The above discussion shows that the nonhomogeneous friction angle coefficient has a non-negligible influence on the ultimate supporting force, and ignoring the influence of the heterogeneous cohesion coefficient λc on the ultimate supporting force will result in inaccurate results. Therefore, considering the heterogeneous cohesion can better evaluate the stability of shopping malls.Figure 8
The influence of heterogeneous cohesion on the stability of excavated face.


## 4. Large-Scale Shopping Mall Architectural Design Based on Intelligent BIM Technology

In the initial stage of BIM application, the design process has not changed much, and the division of scheme design stage, preliminary design stage, and construction drawing design stage is still very clear. Some firms, however, have started to concentrate on professional cooperation in each design step in order to better use the synergy of BIM. Figure9 depicts a typical design process in the early stages of BIM. The present use of BIM is still sensitive to the level of connected software and hardware, which is a significant justification for adopting this method. Simply told, most BIM software today has extremely high computer setup requirements, and even “top configuration” systems cannot handle a large project. As a result, in this situation, the designer would first establish a design concept (such as managing the project origin coordinates), then model various professions independently, with certain large-scale projects requiring modelling within the same profession. At complex design nodes or key time points, the designer uses the “Link” mode to integrate the design results or export the design results to a special software (such as Autodesk Navisworks) for collaborative work. When one stage of collaborative work is successfully completed, the designer enters the next stage of design work.Figure 9
BIM design process at the initial stage.This article combines BIM technology and finite element technology and takes a shopping mall as an example to study the effectiveness of this method by simulating the design process of the shopping mall. Figure10 shows the finite element model of the simulated shopping mall in this paper.Figure 10
Finite element analysis model of shopping mall building. (a) Partial finite element analysis of shopping mall buildings. (b) Finite element analysis of the overall structure of shopping malls.
(a)(b)First of all, this paper verifies the effect of the system design proposed in this paper, combines BIM to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the process of large-scale shopping mall architectural design, and obtains the results shown in Table1.Table 1
Evaluation of shopping mall architectural design effect based on BIM intelligent technology of large-scale shopping mall architectural design model.
NumArchitectural design evaluation180.5559275.8143375.3830471.5944568.9272668.6747781.7511869.0331979.17851081.71891179.89031276.35141382.93961469.91931581.94861670.93321776.73221873.77021973.63902079.76202176.20872271.10802373.64152480.25922574.00472670.91102776.45452868.23402981.69823069.46103182.66393270.33443369.05613474.21493572.90943681.23143772.83303880.90993980.80394071.44354172.75554282.19904379.86604468.79864579.2538The large-scale shopping mall architectural design model based on intelligent BIM technology suggested in this research has an excellent shopping mall architectural design impact, as shown by the aforementioned statistics. The influence of structural finite element analysis of a major shopping mall architectural design model is assessed on this basis, and the findings indicated in Table2 are achieved.Table 2
Evaluation of the structural analysis effect of the large-scale shopping mall architectural design model based on BIM intelligent technology.
NumBuilding structure analysis190.7270284.6731386.0295486.9265571.6231688.6527780.4022887.3672975.49741089.71341177.28151275.63101381.45061476.06091578.36921671.47061789.10211874.25041985.38572089.61872172.68082280.43432387.26562480.45502580.68292674.64982780.96862873.09322986.74023086.79813173.88383272.30593390.71923490.37693588.45373686.56503770.36483880.53533982.86774090.89984188.75354284.48824381.65004482.69744574.4918From the above analysis, it can be seen that the large-scale shopping mall architectural design model based on intelligent BIM technology proposed in this paper has a good shopping mall architectural structure analysis effect.


## 5. Conclusion

Before proceeding with the architectural design of a large shopping mall, a detailed investigation and analysis of the project environment is required. Moreover, it is necessary to confirm the feasibility of shopping mall construction based on the analysis results, clarify the business format and construction scale, and determine the direction of the design ideas. Due to the limited time for commercial operation and design, specific projects need to be used selectively in light of actual conditions. However, owing to the challenging inquiry settings, collecting numerous variables may be problematic. As a result, doing qualitative research on shopping malls using just one approach is unscientific. In any chosen study strategy, both qualitative and quantitative research must be employed extensively. This study employs experimental research to validate the model of this paper, which offers a theoretical reference for later large-scale shopping mall architectural design and integrates BIM technology and finite element analysis techniques to enhance the smart shopping mall design system. Through experimental research, it can be seen that the large-scale shopping mall architectural design model based on intelligent BIM technology proposed in this paper has a good large-scale shopping mall architectural design effect and a good large-scale shopping mall architectural structure analysis effect.



---

*Source: 3116074-2022-06-23.xml*