# A Compact MIMO Antenna with Inverted C-Shaped Ground Branches for Mobile Terminals

Authors: Zixian Yang; Hongchun Yang; Haijuan Cui
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

A compact printed MIMO antenna for mobile terminals is presented. With two planar antenna elements, the −6 dB impedance bandwidth of 2.32 GHz (1.48–3.8 GHz) is obtained, which covers GSM 1800/1900, UMTS, WLAN, Wimax, S-band, and most of LTE bands. Each antenna element with a small occupation of 15 × 20 mm2 consists of a driven strip and a shorted strip. Two inverted C-shaped ground branches are introduced between two elements to improve the isolation. The simulated results are studied and the measured results show that high isolation of more than 18 dB at the entire operating band is achieved. Meanwhile, the impedance performance is also improved by adding the branches. Furthermore, the measured radiation performances and envelope correlation coefficient also demonstrate that the proposed antenna could be a good candidate for mobile terminals.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In the last decade, the technologies of mobile wireless communication have been developing rapidly. From global system for mobile communication (GSM), universal mobile telecommunication system (UMTS) to long-term evolution (LTE), and wireless local area networks (WLAN), the data transfer rates reach a much higher level than ever before, so as the requirements of the mobile terminals. Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technology with multiple antennas is a very effective way to guarantee data rate and increase system capacity [1]. However, the demand for compact size and numerous functions of mobile terminals brings great challenges of designing MIMO antenna with wide operating band covering multiple bands and low mutual coupling in a limited volume and it is still an open issue.Various printed MIMO antennas designed for mobile terminals have been reported in recent years [2–9]. In [2], the proposed antenna resonates at multiple bands, which covers most 2G and 3G cellular frequency bands, some 4G LTE bands, WLAN, and Wimax bands. For two inverted L shaped ground branches and a rectangular slot with one circular end, a good isolation of more than 15 dB is achieved. But the size of the antenna is not compact enough for a mobile phone and the structure is complicated. The antennas in [3, 4] both have the operating bandwidth covering GSM850/900/1800/1900, UMTS, and a few LTE bands. However, in [3], a simple protruded ground makes the coupling only less than −10 dB; in [4], the isolation is more than 12 dB with a T-shaped ground stub as decoupling structure but still needs to be improved. In [5, 6], the design of [5] using a decoupling network of two sections of a transmission line between two radiators has a very high isolation of 23 dB. But the antenna can only work at LTE 13; the antenna in [6] operates in LTE 7 and 2.0–2.8 GHz, but the isolation is poor. For the antennas in [7–9], four-antenna MIMO system in [7] has small size of radiator and good isolation but only works at WLAN. Reference [8] also used a T-shaped ground stub to increase isolation, but the mutual coupling still reaches −11 dB at the peak. In [9], a simple meandered monopole MIMO antenna is presented. With the dual decoupling structures consisting of ground slots and inverted L ground branches, the isolation achieved is better than 15 dB. Nonetheless, the two antenna elements with the ground branches are placed at the top and bottom edges of the substrate, respectively, which occupy twice area as the antennas in other references. And the operating bandwidth is 1.7–2.9 GHz, which needs to be improved as well.In this paper, a wideband printed MIMO antenna with high isolation for mobile terminals is proposed. This antenna has two radiating elements with a compact size of 15 × 20 mm2 for each. Two inverted C-shaped ground branches as decoupling structure are located between the antenna elements to improve isolation. The antenna is simulated, fabricated, and measured. The measured −6 dB impedance bandwidth is 2.32 GHz from 1.48 to 3.8 GHz, which covers GSM1800/1900, UMTS, most of LTE bands, WLAN, Wimax, and S-band satellite communication service. At the same time, high isolation of more than 18 dB at the entire band is achieved. As compared to [9], the proposed antenna has much wider bandwidths of impedance and better isolation with less occupied area.


## 2. Antenna Design

Figure1(a) shows the geometry of the proposed antenna. The substrate is FR4, with a dielectric constant of 4.4, a loss tangent of 0.02, and a thickness of 0.8 mm. The overall size of the antenna is 100 × 65 mm2. The two printed planar antenna elements with size of 15 × 20 mm2, fed by 50 Ω impedance microstrip feedline, are placed symmetrically at the top layer. Each antenna element has a driven strip with a dimension of W1, W2, L1, L2, and L3 and a shorted strip with a dimension of W1, L4, L5, and L6. Two inverted C-shaped branches on the ground plane are located between the two elements, which have a dimension of W1, L7, and L8 and the gap of the two branches is denoted by W3. The detailed view of the antenna element is shown in Figure 1(b).Figure 1
Geometry of the proposed antenna: (a) overall view and (b) detailed view.
(a) (b)To study the effects of the inverted C-shaped ground branches, simulations ofS parameters in different situations are carried out using CST Microwave Studio, based on Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD), and the results are presented in Figure 2. As it is shown in Figure 2(a), without the ground branches, the values of S21 are greater than −15 dB from 1.3 to 2.0 GHz, especially around 1.5 GHz, and almost reach −5 dB. However, the isolation is greatly enhanced by introducing the inverted C-shaped ground branches between the antenna elements. As a result, the values of S21 are less than −16 dB at all frequencies. Meanwhile, the impedance performance is also improved by the branches from 2.5 to 3.3 GHz, as it is shown in Figure 2(b). Figure 3 shows a further study on the surface current distribution with and without the ground branches at 1.6 GHz when port 1 is excited. In Figure 3(a), without the ground branches, a large number of surface currents are coupled to port 2, leading to the low isolation between antenna elements. Contrarily, with the inverted C-shaped ground branches in Figure 3(b), most current flow from port 1 to port 2 is blocked and the mutual coupling between the antenna elements is obviously reduced.Figure 2
Simulated results with/without ground branches: (a)S21; (b) S11.
(a) (b)Figure 3
Surface current distribution at 1.6 GHz: (a) without ground branches; (b) with ground branches.
(a) (b)The radiating mechanism of the proposed antenna is also studied in Figure4, which shows the surface current distribution at different frequencies when port 1 is excited. In Figure 4(a), the antenna is radiating at 1.6 GHz from the shorted strip and part of the driven strip. The total length of the two parts is around 45.5 mm, which is about 0.5λ, where λ is the guided wavelength at 1.6 GHz and it can be calculated by(1)λ=cfc·εeff,where c is the speed of light, fc is the resonant frequency, and εeff is the effective permittivity of the substrate, which is 3.32 in this case. At 2.3 GHz, the resonance is manly generated by the driven strip and a few parts of shorted strip with the length of 0.5λ, as it is seen in Figure 4(b). Figure 4(c) shows that the part of the antenna that is radiating at 3.4 GHz is the shorted strip, which has the length of about 30 mm, nearly 0.5λ. It is also shown that the inverted C-shaped ground branches affect the upper frequency band much less than the lower frequency band.Figure 4
Surface current distribution of the proposed antenna at (a) 1.6 GHz; (b) 2.3 GHz; (c) 3.4 GHz.
(a) (b) (c)


## 3. Results and Discussion

Figure5 shows the fabricated antenna and the final optimized dimensions are as follows: W1 = 1 mm, W2 = 1.5 mm, W3 = 2 mm, W4 = 2.5 mm, L1 = 7.5 mm, L2 = 4.5 mm, L3 = 18 mm, L4 = 3.5 mm, L5 = 14 mm, L6 = 20 mm, L7 = 13 mm, L8 = 11 mm, and L9 = 15 mm.Figure 5
Photo of the fabricated antenna: (a) front view; (b) back view.
(a) (b)Figure6 shows the simulated versus measured results of S parameters. As the two antenna elements are symmetrical, only S11/S22 and S21/S12 are shown. The measured bandwidth is 2.32 GHz from 1.48 to 3.8 GHz as a return loss of 6 dB. So that the proposed antenna is capable of covering GSM1800/1900 (1.71–1.99 GHz), UMTS (1.92–2.17 GHz), WLAN (2.4–2.48 GHz), Wimax (3.4–3.6 GHz), S-band (1.55–3.4 GHz), and LTE bands 1–4, 9-11, and 21–40 [10]. Good agreement between simulated and measured results is observed except a slight shift, probably caused by manufacturing tolerance. The measured mutual coupling is less than −18 dB at the entire band. Compared to the reference antenna [9], the bandwidth is nearly as twice and the isolation is 3 dB more, with half occupation of the radiators and decoupling structures.Figure 6
Simulated and measuredS parameters of the proposed antenna: (a) S11; (b) S21.
(a) (b)Figure7 shows the measured patterns of the proposed antenna when port 1 is excited and port 2 is terminated with a 50 Ω load. The patterns on the x-z (H) plane and y-z (E) plane at 1.5 GHz, 2.4 GHz, and 3.5 GHz are presented in Figures 7(a), 7(b), and 7(c), respectively. Good performance and quasi omnidirection in H plane are obtained.Figure 7
Measured patterns of the proposed antenna at (a) 1.5 GHz; (b) 2.4 GHz; (c) 3.5 GHz.
(a) (b) (c)Figure8 shows the measured peak gains and radiation efficiency of the antenna. The peak gains are from 1.5 to 3.4 dB and the radiation efficiency is above 60% at the operating bands. It also can be seen that, compared to the frequencies with lower return loss value, the gains and efficiency are more at the frequencies where the impedance of the antenna is better.Figure 8
Measured gain and efficiency of the proposed antenna.To further describe the diversity performance of the proposed antenna, the ECCs (envelope correlation coefficient) are calculated by [11](2)ρe=S11∗S12+S21∗S2221-S112-S2121-S222-S122.Figure9 shows the simulated and measured ECCs. As it is seen, the simulated ECCs are below 0.012 over the whole band, while the measured results are below 0.01. It is promised that the proposed antenna can be a good candidate for mobile terminals.Figure 9
Simulated and measured ECCs of the proposed antenna.


## 4. Conclusion

This paper describes a wideband compact MIMO antenna with high isolation for mobile terminal applications. Each of the two antenna elements is composed of a driven strip and a shorted strip to obtain the operating bandwidth from 1.48 to 3.8 GHz, which covers GSM1800/1900, UMTS, WLAN, Wimax, S-band, and most of LTE bands. Two inverted C-shaped ground branches are introduced to decrease the mutual coupling and high isolation of more than 18 dB across the whole band is achieved. The structure of the proposed antenna is simple and easy to optimize. Good radiation performances are also obtained and the envelope correlation coefficient is less than 0.01, making it would be suitable for the MIMO system of mobile terminals.



---

*Source: 3080563-2016-06-15.xml*