# Micromagnetic Simulation of Domain Walls in Exchange Spring Trilayers

Authors: Zijun Wang; Xingqiao Ma; Houbing Huang; Hongwen Xiao; Tianfu Li
Journal: Advances in Condensed Matter Physics
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Chiral domain wall structures in ferromagnetic exchange spring soft/hard/soft and hard/soft/hard trilayers were investigated with micromagnetic simulation, which enables us to fully characterize the nucleation and growth of buried domain walls in layered ferromagnetic thin films. Simulated results show that the trilayers are both exchange coupled and presenting chiral spin structures. Detailed features of field-dependent domain walls evolution in the spring magnets are also revealed. In process of remagnetization, the spin structure of soft/hard/soft is energetically more stable than that of hard/soft/hard.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In the past decades, there has been a tremendous increase in the investigation of magnetic properties of exchange-coupled systems. Exchange-coupled multilayers with alternating hard and soft magnetic layers are of great technological and scientific interest. They can be used as permanent magnets with giant magnetic energy production [1, 2] or as giant magnetostrictive materials with low saturation field [3, 4]. It is expected that the magnetic moments of soft magnetic layer rotate reversibly with the directions distributed successively depending on the distance from the hard/soft interface during the magnetization reversal process. This is the so-called exchange spring phenomenon [5].A variety of studies have been carried out for layered exchange springs. The magnetization reversal process in exchange spring FeTaN/FeSm/FeTaN multilayers was investigated using magneto-optical Kerr effect vector magnetometry to measure in-plane hysteresis loops both parallel and perpendicular to the applied field [6–8]. Nucleation, compression, and propagation of 180° domain walls in GdFe/TbFe/GdFe trilayers were presented. The behavior of domain walls was followed from the electric resistivity of the sample [9]. NiFe/SmFe/NiFe trilayers with in-plane uniaxial anisotropy induced by an applied magnetic field during deposition were prepared on (100)-Si substrates by dc magnetron sputtering. Magnetization hysteresis loops were measured by an alternating-gradient magnetometer for various angles between the external magnetic field and the easy axis [10]. The proposed FePt/Fe3Pt/FePt trilayer reduced the coercive field of a single-phase FePt of the same thickness [11]. FePt/Fe perpendicular exchange-coupled bilayers with different Fe thicknesses were prepared to study the exchange coupling effect and the magnetization switching mechanism [12]. Tuning exchange spring effects in FePt/Fe(Co) magnetic bilayers, possibilities to maximize the exchange spring effects via suitably chosen nonhomogeneous soft magnetic layers are open [13].Features of spin-dependent transport in many systems are related to the growth and movement of domain walls. The development of magnetic recording devices can be accelerated once we understand the physics of confined domain walls. Nevertheless, no magnetic imaging method can yield complete information about the three-dimensional magnetization distribution in a given sample. Techniques to image the moment, such as scanning electron microscopy with polarization analysis (SEMPA) [14], magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) [15], and magneto-optical indicator film (MOIF) imaging [16], are surface sensitive and/or average the moment over the thickness of the magnetic modulations. This restriction can be overcome by computer simulation on microstructure evolving. Here we apply the microscopic phase field method, which is based on Ginzburg-Landau dynamics model, to simulate the magnetic domain walls evolving process with external field in two ferromagnetic exchange spring trilayer thin films [16]. In order to solve the nonlinear Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equations efficiently, Fortran computational advanced language was adopted.


## 2. Theoretical Model

The three-dimensional micromagnetic simulations are carried out by solving the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equations numerically:(1)(1+α2)∂M⃗(r)∂t=-γ0M⃗(r)×H⃗eff-γ0αMsM⃗(r)×(M⃗(r)×H⃗eff),
where α is the damping constant, γ0 is the gyromagnetic ratio, Ms is the saturation magnetization, M⃗is the magnetization, and H⃗eff is the effective magnetic field,
(2)H⃗eff=-1μ0∂E∂M⃗(r),
where μ0 is the permeability of vacuum and E is the total free energy in magnets.The total free energy of the bilayered exchange spring system is given by(3)E=Eani+Ems+Eexch+Eexternal,
where Eani, Ems, Eexch, and Eexternal are magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy, magnetostatic energy, exchange energy, and Zeeman energy, respectively. The detailed expressions of the total free energy are
(4)E=∫(KjMsj2{(M⃗·u^)2})d3r+∫H⃗dem·M⃗d3r+AMsj2∫[gradM⃗(r)]2d3r-∫H⃗ext·M⃗d3r,
where u^ is a unit vector along the anisotropy axis, Kj is the magnetic anisotropy constant, and M⃗is the magnetization of the bilayer of magnitude Msj. H⃗dem is the demagnetization field, H⃗ext is the external magnetic field, and the interface coupling AI is assumed to be equal to the exchange coefficient A.Simulated structures include two different trilayer ferromagnets constitute of soft/hard/soft and hard/soft/hard thin films, as shown in Figure1(a). The uppermost and lowest layers are soft ferromagnets. Both of their thicknesses are 44.5 nm. The middle layer is hard layer with thickness of 89 nm. Similar to soft/hard/soft trilayer model, the hard/soft/hard exchange spring is constituted by three thin films as showed in Figure 1(b), substituting the soft layers with hard ones and hard layer with soft one, respectively. The dynamics of magnetization was investigated by numerically solving the time-dependent LLG equation using the Gauss-Seidel projection method [17–19] with a constant time step Δt=0.0238993 ps [20]. Simulations with a shorter time step gave the same results exactly. The samples were discrete in computational cells of 2×2×2 nm3. Other parameters are adopted as shown in the following: soft layer saturation magnetization Ms1=106 A/m, soft layer magnetic anisotropy constant Ks=5×102 J/m3, soft layer exchange constant As=10-11 J/m; hard layer saturation magnetization Ms2=106 A/m, hard layer magnetic anisotropy constant Kh=105 J/m3, and hard layer exchange constant Ah=10-11 J/m. According to our previous calculations [21], the anisotropy constant of soft layer has a strong influence on the magnetic properties at a small applied field. However, for a large applied field, the magnetic properties are mainly influenced by anisotropy constant of hard layers.Geometry of (a) soft/hard/soft and (b) hard/soft/hard spring trilayer nanostructures and their magnetic domain wall structures.
(a)
(b)


## 3. Results

We investigated two different magnetic structures in exchange spring trilayers of soft 44.5 nm/hard 89 nm/soft 44.5 nm and hard 44.5 nm/soft 89 nm/hard 44.5 nm by using micromagnetic simulation. Schematic magnetization domain wall configurations of the two spring trilayers are showed on the right of Figures1(a) and 1(b). The magnetic states of the samples were firstly saturation magnetized along -x-axis for (a) and +x-axis for (b), ensuring the uniform magnetization in all three layers of two structures. Then, the applied magnetic field was gradually increased along the +x-axis for (a) and -x-axis for (b). Micromagnetic simulation results indicate that the magnetic moments in the springs parallel the film plane and rotate successively with depth. As a result, the moments in each trilayer distribute as a chiral structure like Bloch domain walls. However, the two spin structures are intrinsic distinction excluding the effect of their different chemical configuration. The spin structure of soft/hard/soft distributes like a 360° Bloch domain wall while that of hard/soft/hard like two 180° Bloch domain walls.Figures2(a) and 2(b) show the in-plane hysteresis loops along x-axis for soft/hard/soft and hard/soft/hard spring trilayers, respectively. The “knee” shape of hysteresis loops is clearly observed, which indicates that both of the trilayers are exchange spring coupled. They show similar magnetic properties; for example, the two nucleation fields are nearly 1.0×104 A/m and the irreversible switching fields are less than 8.0×104A/m. From this point of view, they could be the potential materials for magnetostriction or permanent magnet with high performance. However, there is slight difference of hysteresis loops between them, and we will discuss it in Table 1.Table 1
Magnetization of hard/soft/hard and soft/hard/soft at different external magnetic fields.
H (A/m) materials
1.0 × 104
2.0 × 104
3.0 × 104
4.0 × 104
5.0 × 104
6.0 × 104
7.0 × 104
8.0 × 104
Hard/soft/hard
1
0.3004
0.1333
0.0664
0.0335
0.0145
−0.0030
−1
Soft/hard/soft
1
0.3006
0.1336
0.0667
0.0339
0.0153
0.0003
−1Hysteresis loops of (a) soft/hard/soft and (b) hard/soft/hard spring trilayers.
(a)
(b)The difference of the values of saturation magnetization between them is awfully small, which can be seen by the two nearly identical loops. To observe the difference between their saturation clearly, we present the concrete values as displayed in Table1. From the table, the difference is of the magnitude of 10-4. As the external magnetic field increases, it becomes larger. For instance, it is 0.0002 at 2×104 A/m and 0.0033 at 7×104 A/m. This is the case until the external magnetic field reaches 8×104 A/m, at which the two trilayers were both saturation magnetized. For each Hext between 2×104 A/m and 6×104 A/m, the value of soft/hard/soft trilayer is always slightly larger than that of hard/soft/hard one, which means that the moments of the latter rotate more slowly than those of the former with Hext increased. In other words, the soft/hard/soft spring magnet is more energetically stable compared to the hard/soft/hard one. That soft/hard/soft magnetic moments are harder to change under Hext also indicates that the trilayer possesses stronger exchange-coupled effect.To further elucidate the magnetic structure of the exchange spring trilayers, we divide the spring systems into 20 sublayers horizontally from up to down. Each sublayer is assumed to have a uniform direction of moment. The angles between magnetic moments and the field direction under different magnitude of magnetic fields are showed in Figure3 (2.0×104 A/m, 3.0×104A/m, 4.0×104A/m, 5.0×104 A/m, 6.0×104 A/m, 7.0×104 A/m). Each curve corresponds to one point on the hysteresis loops.The angles of the magnetization to external field in (a) soft/hard/soft and (b) hard/soft/hard structures.
(a)
(b)The moments in soft layers play an important role during the process of remagnetization. These moments can be switched much more considerably than those moments in hard layers, from which we can safely infer that remagnetization nucleation firstly formed in soft layers and gradually propagated to hard ones. Contrary to our expectations for low field, reversible magnetization involves almost completely the hard ferromagnets. Therefore, the ranges of moments rotation angle are0°~360° and 0°~180° for soft/hard/soft and hard/soft/hard, respectively. The moments in the two spring magnets are distributed as chiral structure which conforms to the principle of minimum energy.The magnetization vectors distribution with depth expressed in degrees is showed in Figure3. For soft/hard/soft, the rotation angles increase from surface to bottom, while for hard/soft/hard, the angles increase from the middle to either surface or bottom. For both trilayers, the rotation angles change successively with depth and the angular slopes increase with close to the interfaces (denoted by four vertical dashed lines). This tendency is drastically enlarged at the interfaces, suggesting exchange-coupled interaction there called energy barrier. With external field H increased, the angle difference between two magnetization vectors at the interface (one vector in soft layer and the other one locating in hard layer) becomes larger significantly, leading to an increase of energy barrier. Of course, there is more or less interfacial roughness or diffusion for thin films in practical situation, brought by the film growth, which might weaken the barrier effect.


## 4. Conclusions

In summary, we investigated two different chiral structures of exchange-coupled soft/hard/soft and hard/soft/hard trilayers with micromagnetic simulation, which makes us readily extract the magnetic domain walls distribution with depth in buried layers. The two spring magnets have almost similar hysteresis loops. Nevertheless, they show intrinsic different domain wall structures. The hard/soft/hard one forms two 180° Bloch domain walls while the soft/hard/soft one forms a 360° Bloch wall due to the exchange-coupled effect. We present both the angle and angular gradient of the moments with film depth; thus the chirality of the whole spin structures is clearly obtained.



---

*Source: 301063-2014-05-08.xml*