# A Defected Structure Shaped CPW-Fed Wideband Microstrip Antenna for Wireless Applications

Authors: Puneet Khanna; Amar Sharma; Kshitij Shinghal; Arun Kumar
Journal: Journal of Engineering
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

A coplanar waveguide- (CPW-) fed compact wideband defected structure shaped microstrip antenna is proposed for wireless applications. Defected structure is produced by cutting theU shape antenna in the form of two-sided T shape. The proposed antenna consists of two-sided T shape strip as compared to usual monopole patch antenna for minimizing the height of the antenna. The large space around the radiator is fully utilized as the ground is on the same plane as of radiator. Microstrip line feed is used to excite the proposed antenna placed on an FR4 substrate (dielectric constant εr=4.4). The antenna is practically fabricated and simulated. Simulated results of the proposed antenna have been obtained by using Ansoft High-Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS) software. These results are compared with measured results by using network analyzer. Measured result shows good agreement with the simulated results. It is observed that the proposed antenna shows a wideband from 2.96 GHz to 7.95 GHz with three bands at f1=3.23 GHz, f2=4.93 GHz, and f3=7.04 GHz.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Earlier, a number of studies used different antenna structures to design wideband microstrip patch antenna. However, the dimension of antenna is a very challenging task especially in the case of ground structure [1–3].The familiar structure ofλ/4 single antenna radiator gives wideband. All the researchers have focused on the shrinking of monopole antenna size. Most of the designs are facing the shortcomings of the monopole antenna such as large ground area, height of antenna radiator, and the space around the antenna radiator [4–6]. Design of simple, compact, and multipurpose antenna is an important aspect in the integration of wideband system with moveable devices so that it can reduce the difficulty of the transmitter and receiver of the system [7]. Various shapes of microstrip antennas have been used for compact wideband antenna. Some of them are as butterfly shape [8], inverted cone slot [9], tapered slot with tuning patch [10], inverted L-strip slot [11], LTCC technology [12], triple layer double U shape slot [13], inverted U shape slot [14], and many other shapes [15].The present paper presents a minute study of coplanar waveguide- (CPW-) fed compact wideband antenna that is proposed and designed. The antenna is composed of a radiating patch having good radiation ranges from 2.96 to 7.95 GHz with an impedance bandwidth of 91.47%. The proposed antenna uses two-sidedT shape strip over the conventional radiator patch antenna for reducing the height of the antenna. The ground is also on the same plane as of radiator so that the large space around the radiator is fully utilized. The advantage of proposed antenna is that it covers wide range of frequency while single band antenna requires installation of two or more antennas for the same purpose at the same location that creates complexity. The proposed structure of the antenna is shown in Figure 1. The next section deals with antenna designing technique, in detail. Section 3 covers experimental results and its discussion. Section 4 concludes all the discussion made earlier.Figure 1
Schematic configuration of the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna.
(a)
(b)


## 2. Antenna Design

The design of the two-sidedT shape proposed antenna has been shown in Figure 1. The proposed antenna design is chosen to generate three resonant bands for achieving wide bandwidth. It consists of two-sided T shape strip and two grounds placed on the same plane as of radiator fed by CPW. The antenna is fabricated and printed on an FR4 substrate having relative permittivity εr=4.4, thickness h=1.6 mm, and loss tangent tan⁡δ=0.024. The overall size of the antenna is 25 × 25 × 1.6 mm3. The electromagnetic solver, Ansoft HFSS [16], is used to investigate and optimize the dimensions of the proposed design on the basis of best performance. The width of the CPW feed line is fixed at 1.5 mm to achieve 50 Ω characteristic impedance. While the radiator is bounded by a metal ground plane for reducing the antenna area, the small gap between the radiator and the ground plane causes capacitive coupling. This type of design is introduced to obtain wideband with good impedance matching over the entire band. The base of the monopole radiator is a rectangular U shape having dimensions of length Lp2 and width Wp3 which is further converted into two-sided T shape by connecting two strips on both the sides with dimensions of length Lp1 and width Wp1 having a distance of Lp3 from the base of rectangular U shape.The ground planes are embedded from the patch's left and right sides on the same plane to provide the CPW feed. The proposed antenna having dimensions listed in Table1 are used to obtain wideband and better return loss along with an efficiency of 91.47%. A photograph of the fabricated antenna is shown in Figure 2. Figure 3 trace (iii) shows the simulated return loss of the proposed antenna. Simulated results show wide bandwidth from 2.96 to 7.95 GHz. Initially the rectangular patch was tested for wide bandwidth shown in Figure 3 trace (i), and then the radiator shape was further modified to rectangular U shape shown in Figure 3 trace (ii). In both these cases worst return loss appears over the entire frequency band with a single resonant band at about 3.23 GHz. As for the case of the proposed design of two-sided T shaped antenna Figure 3 trace (iii) improves the impedance matching conditions for the entire band and shows three resonant bands f1=3.23 GHz, f2=4.93 GHz, and f3=7.04 GHz, respectively. Note that, in all these three cases, the ground structure is the same as shown in Figure 3, while all the unspecified dimensions are the same as listed in Table 1.Table 1
Proposed antenna design parameters.
Parameters
L
p
1
L
p
2
L
p
3
L
p
4
L
g
1
L
g
2
L
p
d
L
r
Unit (mm)
3
7
2
6.6
8
1
0.8
5.3
Parameters
W
p
1
W
p
2
W
p
3
W
g
1
W
g
2
W
g
3
W
f
h
Unit (mm)
2.5
2.5
5
10.6
4
1
1.5
1.6Figure 2
Photograph of the fabricated CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna.Figure 3
Simulated return loss against frequency for the rectangular antenna, rectangularU shape antenna, and proposed CPW-fed two-sided T strip wideband microstrip antenna.


### 2.1. Variation ofT Strip Parameters

Figure4 shows the simulated results of the proposed antenna with T strip length Lp3 that varies from 1.0 to 3.0 mm. On increasing the length of Lp3, it was observed that with increase of length the radiating patch shows increase in bandwidth and also increase in the resonant bands >10 dB for every change in length. The patch shows the wide bandwidth except for 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm. The return loss with three resonant bands >10 dB comes in the case when Lp3=2.0 mm while at resonant band f2=4.93 GHz it shows the maximum return loss and covers the whole band. Therefore it is decided to take Lp3=2.0 mm as the optimum length, to get wide bandwidth from 2.96 to 7.95 GHz.Figure 4
Simulated return loss against frequency for the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna with various values of Lp3; other parameters are the same as listed in Table 1.The simulated results of the proposed antenna with the patch widthWp1 is shown in Figure 5. Wp1 varies from 1.5 mm to 3.5 mm. It was observed that the return loss <10 dB with three resonant bands is achieved only at Wp1=2.5 mm; for other values of Wp1 it was found out that they do not cover up the entire wideband with three resonant bands with greater return loss. Therefore it is decided to take Wp1=2.5 mm as the optimum patch width, resulting in the bandwidth from 2.96 to 7.95 GHz.Figure 5
Simulated return loss against frequency for the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna with various values of Wp1; other parameters are the same as listed in Table 1.


### 2.2. Variation of Centre Part of Rectangular Slot Parameters

Figure6 shows the simulated result of the proposed antenna with the variation of the centre part of rectangular slot length Lp4. The length of Lp4 varies from 6.5 to 6.7 mm. The result shows that for all lengths the return loss is >10 dB which covers the whole band, but for resonant bands f1=3.23 GHz and f2=4.93 GHz the maximum return loss was obtained when Lp4=6.6 mm. Therefore it is decided to take Lp4=6.6 mm as the optimum length for the use in the proposed antenna.Figure 6
Simulated return loss against frequency for the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna with various values of Lp4; other parameters are the same as listed in Table 1.


### 2.3. Variation of Microstrip Feed Parameters

Figure7 shows the simulated result of the proposed antenna with the variation of the feed width Wf. The width Wf varies from 1.3 mm to 1.7 mm. The result shows that with the increase in feed width the resonant bands increase up to the value of Wf=1.5 mm. For more than 1.5 mm value of Wf the bandwidth decreases. Therefore we took Wf=1.5 as the optimum feed width, resulting in the bandwidth from 2.96 to 7.95 GHz.Figure 7
Simulated return loss against frequency for the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna with various values of Wf; other parameters are the same as listed in Table 1.


## 2.1. Variation ofT Strip Parameters

Figure4 shows the simulated results of the proposed antenna with T strip length Lp3 that varies from 1.0 to 3.0 mm. On increasing the length of Lp3, it was observed that with increase of length the radiating patch shows increase in bandwidth and also increase in the resonant bands >10 dB for every change in length. The patch shows the wide bandwidth except for 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm. The return loss with three resonant bands >10 dB comes in the case when Lp3=2.0 mm while at resonant band f2=4.93 GHz it shows the maximum return loss and covers the whole band. Therefore it is decided to take Lp3=2.0 mm as the optimum length, to get wide bandwidth from 2.96 to 7.95 GHz.Figure 4
Simulated return loss against frequency for the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna with various values of Lp3; other parameters are the same as listed in Table 1.The simulated results of the proposed antenna with the patch widthWp1 is shown in Figure 5. Wp1 varies from 1.5 mm to 3.5 mm. It was observed that the return loss <10 dB with three resonant bands is achieved only at Wp1=2.5 mm; for other values of Wp1 it was found out that they do not cover up the entire wideband with three resonant bands with greater return loss. Therefore it is decided to take Wp1=2.5 mm as the optimum patch width, resulting in the bandwidth from 2.96 to 7.95 GHz.Figure 5
Simulated return loss against frequency for the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna with various values of Wp1; other parameters are the same as listed in Table 1.


## 2.2. Variation of Centre Part of Rectangular Slot Parameters

Figure6 shows the simulated result of the proposed antenna with the variation of the centre part of rectangular slot length Lp4. The length of Lp4 varies from 6.5 to 6.7 mm. The result shows that for all lengths the return loss is >10 dB which covers the whole band, but for resonant bands f1=3.23 GHz and f2=4.93 GHz the maximum return loss was obtained when Lp4=6.6 mm. Therefore it is decided to take Lp4=6.6 mm as the optimum length for the use in the proposed antenna.Figure 6
Simulated return loss against frequency for the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna with various values of Lp4; other parameters are the same as listed in Table 1.


## 2.3. Variation of Microstrip Feed Parameters

Figure7 shows the simulated result of the proposed antenna with the variation of the feed width Wf. The width Wf varies from 1.3 mm to 1.7 mm. The result shows that with the increase in feed width the resonant bands increase up to the value of Wf=1.5 mm. For more than 1.5 mm value of Wf the bandwidth decreases. Therefore we took Wf=1.5 as the optimum feed width, resulting in the bandwidth from 2.96 to 7.95 GHz.Figure 7
Simulated return loss against frequency for the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna with various values of Wf; other parameters are the same as listed in Table 1.


## 3. Experimental Results and Discussion

An Agilent 8757E scalar network analyzer was used to measure the performance of the proposed antenna such as return loss. Figure8 shows the measured and simulated return loss curves of the two-sided T shape wideband antenna. There is a balanced agreement in measured and simulated results that is shown in Figure 8. The small difference between the measured and simulated result is due to the effect of SMA (subminiature version A) connector soldering and fabrication tolerance. The designed antenna has a wide bandwidth performance from 2.96 to 7.95 GHz with three resonant bands at f1=3.23 GHz, f2=4.93 GHz, and f3=7.04 GHz, respectively.Figure 8
Measured and simulated return loss for the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna.Table2 shows a comparative study between the proposed antenna and some existing antennas on the basis of wideband CPW structure. The tabulated data clearly shows that the proposed antenna has highest gain among the other antennas having approximate similar dimensions. On the other part, some of the antennas have smaller gain with enhanced bandwidth and dimension. These large size antennas would require more space for installation in portable device which is not a preferable situation.Table 2
Comparison between the proposed antenna and some existing wideband microstrip antenna.
Reference
Antenna type
Overall dimension (mm3)
Frequency range (GHz)
Fract. bandwidth (%)
Maximum gain (dBi)
Relative dielectric constant,εr
Application
[1]
Wideband
60 × 30 × 1.6
1.2–4.5
142
2.2
4.4
General
[17]
UWB
29 × 31 × 1.6
3.0–10.6
111
5.5
4.4
UWB
[18]
Wideband
30 × 31 × 1.6
3.8–5.5
Not given
10.8
4.4
WLAN and WiMAX
[19]
Dual band
30 × 30 × 1.58
1.86–1.97, 3.0–12.0
52, 120
5
4.4
PCS and UWB
[20]
Wideband
38 × 25 × 1.6
2.4–6.0
86.71
2.85
4.4
WLAN,WiMAX
Proposedantenna
Wideband
25 × 25 × 1.6
2.96–7.95
91.47
7.3
4.4
S and C bandFigures9(a)–9(c) show the simulated and measured far field radiation patterns in the H and E planes at frequencies 3.23 GHz, 4.93 GHz, and 7.04 GHz. It has been found out that the proposed antenna has nearly good omnidirectional radiation pattern at all frequencies in the E plane and the H plane. As shown in Figure 1(a), the shape of proposed antenna is two-sided T strip. The proposed antenna has nonregular geometric shape. This shape is chosen to get desired wideband and high gain. Due to this nonregular geometry, the radiation pattern of proposed antenna is not smooth, but at all three frequencies (3.23 GHz, 4.93 GHz, and 7.04 GHz) 3 dB beam width is sufficient for all wireless applications.Figure 9
Measured and simulated radiation pattern of various resonance frequencies for the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna (a) at 3.23 GHz, (b) 4.93 GHz, and (c) 7.04 GHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)Gain is an important parameter in the design of wideband antenna. Figure10 illustrates the simulated and measured gain of the proposed antenna. It was found out that the gain of the antenna varies within 1.5 to 7.3 dBi against the frequency band of 2.96 to 7.95 GHz. Group delay is also an important parameter in the design of the wideband antenna because it shows the degree of distortion in transmitted pulses. For good pulse transmission group delay should be less than 0.5 ns. Figure 11 illustrates the group delay of the proposed antenna. It was found out that the variation of the group delay for proposed antenna is almost constant for the entire frequency band of 2.96 to 7.95 GHz. This shows that the proposed antenna is suitable for wideband communication.Figure 10
Measured and simulated gain for the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna.Figure 11
Group delay for the proposed CPW-fed two-sidedT strip wideband microstrip antenna.


## 4. Conclusion

The proposed coplanar waveguide- (CPW-) fed compact wideband defected structure shaped microstrip antenna with two-sidedT strip is designed and fabricated. The measured result of the fabricated antenna shows omnidirectional radiation pattern over the entire operating bandwidth. Three different resonant bands are obtained at 3.23 GHz, 4.04 GHz, and 7.04 GHz which works on S and C band, which are most suitable for various communication systems. The antenna has a wide bandwidth of about 91.47% in the frequency range from 2.96 to 7.95 GHz.



---

*Source: 2863508-2016-02-17.xml*