# Antimycobacterial Activities of Novel 5-(1H-1,2,3-Triazolyl)Methyl Oxazolidinones

Authors: Oludotun Adebayo Phillips; Edet Ekpenyong Udo; Reny Varghese
Journal: Tuberculosis Research and Treatment
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

The antibacterial activities of a series of triazolyl oxazolidinones againstMycobacterium tuberculosis strain in vitro and in vivo in a mice model are presented. Most active compounds were noncytotoxic against VERO cells with acceptable selectivity indexes (SI) as measures of compound tolerability. Structure activity relationships (SARs) revealed that analogs with alkylcarbonyl (IC90: < 0.2 to 0.422 μg/mL) and arylcarbonyl (IC90: < 0.2 to 2.103 μg/mL) groups at the piperazine 4N-position-displayed potent antimycobacterium activities, comparable to the methanesulfonyl (IC90: < 0.2 μg/mL) analog, linezolid (IC90: < 0.2 μg/mL), and isoniazid (IC90: < 0.034 μg/mL). The furanylcarbonyl derivative also displayed potent activity, while the arylsulfonyl analogs were inactive. Of the triazolyl oxazolidinones, the morpholino (PH-27) derivative with medium bioavailability in plasma was most active in vivo, but relatively less efficacious than isoniazid.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) caused byMycobacterium  tuberculosis, a contagious and fatal disease, is considered a global epidemic and a major threat to public health. TB is becoming more prevalent in the world today than any other time in human history. It has been estimated that over a third of the world’s population is infected with the TB bacilli, with 9.4 million new cases and nearly 1.7 million deaths in 2009 [1, 2]. Most infected people harbor latent TB infection (LTBI), and people with HIV/AIDS and compromised immune system are more likely to develop the disease. TB continues to be a leading cause of death in HIV/AIDS patients, forming a lethal combination.A number of drugs, namely, isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide are often administered over a prolonged period of time and may lead to the development of resistant strains due to patient-poor compliance among other factors. The development and spread of resistantM. tuberculosis,pose a vital challenge to the control of TB world-wide. In recent years, the emergence and spread of resistant M. tuberculosis strains has fuelled the TB epidemic by making it more difficult to treat. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB, which is resistant to the first line anti-TB agents, namely, isoniazid and rifampicin are increasing with >500,000/yr new cases of MDR-TB worldwide [3, 4]. Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB, resistant to first line anti-TB agents, namely, isoniazid, rifampicin, fluoroquinolones, and one of three injectable drugs, such as capreomycin, kanamycin, or amikacin is awfully difficult to treat and is considered a worldwide threat to TB control [3, 4]. These statistics serve as impetus for development of more effective and safer anti-TB drugs [5]. For more than 40 years, there has been a drought of new anti-TB drugs. However, more recently, there are increasing reports of newer agents demonstrating activity against drug-resistant M.  tuberculosis strains [5–8]. Among these new agents are the oxazolidinones (linezolid—LZD; and PNU-100480; Figure 1), diarylquinoline (TMC-207; Figure 1), the nitroimidazole-oxazole (OPC-67683; Figure 1), the nitroimidazo-oxazine (PA-824, Figure 1), and some quinolone class of compounds. Linezolid (LZD; Figure 1), a prototypical oxazolidinone used in the clinic to treat gram-positive bacterial infections, the thiomorpholino derivative of LZD (PNU-100480; Figure 1), and others in this class, have demonstrated activity against susceptible and drug-resistant M. tuberculosis. Our laboratories have been interested in the synthesis of triazolylmethyl oxazolidinones of general structures PH-27, 1, 2, and 3 (Figure 1) with antibacterial activity [9–12]. Studies from other laboratories and ours have shown that the triazolyl oxazolidinones have potent activity against gram-positive bacterial species [9–14], comparable or superior to linezolid in vitro, thus affirming the bioisosteric replacement of the C5 acetamido functional group by the triazolyl moiety. On the basis of the potent antibacterial activities of the triazolyl oxazolidinones and the demonstrated antimycobacterium activities of representative oxazolidinones, namely, LZD and PNU-100480, we evaluated the antiMycobacterium tuberculosis activity of selected novel triazolylmethyl oxazolidinones synthesized from our laboratories. Therefore, this study outlines the in vitro and in vivo antimycobacterial activity of selected triazolylmethyl oxazolidinones and to establish observable qualitative structure-activity relationships.Figure 1
Chemical structure of oxazolidinone antibacterial agents and novel antimycobacterial agents.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Synthesis of Compounds

The preparation of the compounds1a-p, 2a-m, and 3a-e has been described previously [9–12]. The reference antituberculosis agents isoniazid (INH) and linezolid (LZD) were provided by the Tuberculosis Antimicrobial Acquisition and Coordinating Facility (TAACF), Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL., USA.


### 2.2. Antituberculosis Susceptibility Testing

Thein vitro antitubercular testing was determined according to the protocols of the Tuberculosis Antimicrobial Acquisition and Coordinating Facility (TAACF), USA [15, 16]. The activity of all compounds against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv (ATCC 27294, American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA) was performed in BACTEC 12B medium using a fluorescence readout in the Microplate Alamar Blue Assay (MABA) according to the TAACF initial primary screen assays. Compounds were dissolved in 80% DMSO or 60% EtOH in water or H2O and tested in ten 2-fold dilutions, ranging from 0.19 to 100 μg/mL; the IC90 (μg/mL) values defined as “inhibitory concentration” effecting a reduction in fluorescence of 90% relative to the controls. The values were determined from dose-response curves, and compounds with IC90≤10 μg/mL were considered active for anti-tubercular activity.


### 2.3. Mammalian VERO Cell Cytotoxicity (CC50) Assay

The compounds were screened to assess toxicity to African green monkey kidney (VERO) cells using the Promage’s Cell Titer Glo Luminescent Cell Viability assay by TAACF. The assay returns a CC50 value, which allows a selectivity index (SI: ratio of CC50/IC90) to be calculated. Compounds with SI value ≥ 10 are considered safe for further screening.


### 2.4. PreliminaryIn Vivo Bioavailability Testing (BioAssay)

Allin vivo assays/evaluations were determined according to the TAACF protocols [15]. This assay was used to estimate drug levels in mice at specific time points after oral dosing, using the inhibition of growth of M. tuberculosis H37Rv as an indicator for drug activity. Selected compounds were orally dosed (300 mg/kg in 0.5% methyl cellulose) in three C57BL/6 mice and the animals were bled by nicking the lateral vein at 30 mins and 2.5 hrs, respectively, to collect blood samples. The blood samples were allowed to clot and centrifuged to collect serum, which were serially diluted and added to 96-well assay plates containing M. tuberculosis H37Rv (104 bacterial) on 100 μL 7H9 broth with 10% serum. Each assay also contains lanes of wells with drugs of known concentrations, with or without 10% mouse serum. Inhibition of bacterial growth was determined by optical density (λ=600 nm) measurements every 3-4 days up to 14 days. The results were further confirmed by visual inspection at 10 days. Inhibition of bacterial growth in the assay (<50% of control without drugs) indicates sufficiently high concentration of compound in blood and hence an acceptable bioavailability.


### 2.5.In Vivo Efficacy Gamma Knock-Out (GKO) Mouse Model

Interferon gamma knockout female mice C57BL/6 IFN-KO (n=5) unable to control an infection of M. tuberculosis were infected with M. tuberculosis ATCC 35801 (Erdman strain) by aerosol infection utilizing the Glass-Col Inhalation Exposure System. Treatment was started on day 13 after infection for 9 consecutive daily treatments until day 21. Test compounds were dissolved in 0.5% methyl cellulose and administered via oral gavage. An isoniazid (INH) control group, administered via oral gavage at 25 mg/Kg/day (H2O), was included in each study. Mice were sacrificed on day 22 postinfection, and bacterial loads in the lungs and spleen were determined [15]. The Log10 CFU reduction values > 0.30 generally indicate activity.


## 2.1. Synthesis of Compounds

The preparation of the compounds1a-p, 2a-m, and 3a-e has been described previously [9–12]. The reference antituberculosis agents isoniazid (INH) and linezolid (LZD) were provided by the Tuberculosis Antimicrobial Acquisition and Coordinating Facility (TAACF), Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL., USA.


## 2.2. Antituberculosis Susceptibility Testing

Thein vitro antitubercular testing was determined according to the protocols of the Tuberculosis Antimicrobial Acquisition and Coordinating Facility (TAACF), USA [15, 16]. The activity of all compounds against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv (ATCC 27294, American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA) was performed in BACTEC 12B medium using a fluorescence readout in the Microplate Alamar Blue Assay (MABA) according to the TAACF initial primary screen assays. Compounds were dissolved in 80% DMSO or 60% EtOH in water or H2O and tested in ten 2-fold dilutions, ranging from 0.19 to 100 μg/mL; the IC90 (μg/mL) values defined as “inhibitory concentration” effecting a reduction in fluorescence of 90% relative to the controls. The values were determined from dose-response curves, and compounds with IC90≤10 μg/mL were considered active for anti-tubercular activity.


## 2.3. Mammalian VERO Cell Cytotoxicity (CC50) Assay

The compounds were screened to assess toxicity to African green monkey kidney (VERO) cells using the Promage’s Cell Titer Glo Luminescent Cell Viability assay by TAACF. The assay returns a CC50 value, which allows a selectivity index (SI: ratio of CC50/IC90) to be calculated. Compounds with SI value ≥ 10 are considered safe for further screening.


## 2.4. PreliminaryIn Vivo Bioavailability Testing (BioAssay)

Allin vivo assays/evaluations were determined according to the TAACF protocols [15]. This assay was used to estimate drug levels in mice at specific time points after oral dosing, using the inhibition of growth of M. tuberculosis H37Rv as an indicator for drug activity. Selected compounds were orally dosed (300 mg/kg in 0.5% methyl cellulose) in three C57BL/6 mice and the animals were bled by nicking the lateral vein at 30 mins and 2.5 hrs, respectively, to collect blood samples. The blood samples were allowed to clot and centrifuged to collect serum, which were serially diluted and added to 96-well assay plates containing M. tuberculosis H37Rv (104 bacterial) on 100 μL 7H9 broth with 10% serum. Each assay also contains lanes of wells with drugs of known concentrations, with or without 10% mouse serum. Inhibition of bacterial growth was determined by optical density (λ=600 nm) measurements every 3-4 days up to 14 days. The results were further confirmed by visual inspection at 10 days. Inhibition of bacterial growth in the assay (<50% of control without drugs) indicates sufficiently high concentration of compound in blood and hence an acceptable bioavailability.


## 2.5.In Vivo Efficacy Gamma Knock-Out (GKO) Mouse Model

Interferon gamma knockout female mice C57BL/6 IFN-KO (n=5) unable to control an infection of M. tuberculosis were infected with M. tuberculosis ATCC 35801 (Erdman strain) by aerosol infection utilizing the Glass-Col Inhalation Exposure System. Treatment was started on day 13 after infection for 9 consecutive daily treatments until day 21. Test compounds were dissolved in 0.5% methyl cellulose and administered via oral gavage. An isoniazid (INH) control group, administered via oral gavage at 25 mg/Kg/day (H2O), was included in each study. Mice were sacrificed on day 22 postinfection, and bacterial loads in the lungs and spleen were determined [15]. The Log10 CFU reduction values > 0.30 generally indicate activity.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The main goals of this study included evaluating the antimycobacterial activities of a series of triazolyl oxazolidinone derivatives1a-p and 2a-m and 3a-e, in vitro and in vivo, and explore recognizable structure-activity relationships (SARs) around the phenyloxazolidinone moiety. The synthesis of the compounds was described previously [9–12]. The results from the in vitro and in vivo (mice model) studies, presented in the Tables 1–5, were determined according to TAACF protocols [15, 16]. Data from in vitro antimycobacterium and VERO cytoctoxicity assays are presented in Tables 1 and 2. From these data most of the compounds displayed potent to lack of activity against M. tuberculosis H37Rv strain with IC90 values in the range of <0.2 to >100 μg/mL, while the reference compounds linezolid (LZD) and isoniazid (INH) showed IC90 values of <0.2 and 0.034 μg/mL, respectively. The 4N-acylpiperazinyl derivatives displayed potent activity (IC90 range of >0.2–0.422 μg/mL, Table 1), in comparison to the 4N-aryl-carbonylpiperazinyl derivatives, which were relatively less active with IC90 in the range of <0.2–2.103 μg/mL. On the other hand, the 4N-arylsulfonyl derivatives were devoid of antimycobacterium activity (IC90 range of 5.469–100 μg/mL), while the methane-sulfonylpiperazinyl derivative 3a showed potent activity with IC90 value of <0.2 μg/mL. Although positive correlations between log P values and antimycobacterium activity have been demonstrated by previous other studies [17], however, such correlations could not be drawn in the present study since the MIC end-points were not determined. The ClogP values of the compounds were estimated using ChemDraw Ultra 8.0.Table 1
In vitro antimycobacterium activity of 4N-acylpiperazinyl oxazolidinones against M. tuberculosis H37Rv.
Compd.–RClogP valuesIC90 (μg/mL)CC50 (μg/mL) VEROSI1aHCO−1.1502<0.20>37.43>187.1bCH3CO−1.2042<0.20>41.64>208.2cCF3CO−0.09520.281>44.23>156.8dCHCl2CO0.1218<0.20>45.72>228.6eCH3CH2CO−0.67520.334>40.24>120.4fCH3CH2OCO0.97480.422>41.84>98.91g(CH3)2CHCO−0.36620.283>41.64>146.6h(CH3)3COCO1.6828<0.20>44.64>223.2iCH3(CH2)4CO0.9118<0.20>44.45>222.2jcyclohexanoyl0.82682.095>45.65>21.79kCH3(CH2)5CO1.4408<0.20>45.85>229.2lCH3(CH2)6CO1.9698<0.20>47.25>236.2mCH3(CH2)7CO2.4988<0.20>48.65>243.2nCH3(CH2)8CO3.0278<0.20>50.06>250.3oCH3(CH2)9CO3.5568<0.20>51.46>257.3p1.7208<0.20>48.25>241.2PH-270.63080.466>34.73>74.53LZD0.5321<0.20>33.73>168.6INH−0.6680.034>100>2941Table 2
In vitro antimycobacterium activity of 4N-arylcarbonyl- and 4N-arylsulfonyl-piperazinyl oxazolidinones against M. tuberculosis H37Rv.
Compd.–RClogP valuesIC90 (μg/mL)CC50 (μg/mL) VEROSI2aPhCO0.61480.722>45.04>62.3b4-ClPhCO1.4304<0.20>48.49>242.4c3-NO2PhCO0.51980.759>49.54>65.27d2-CH3PhCO1.11383.375>46.45>13.76e3-CH3PhCO1.11380.422>46.45>110f4-CH3PhCO1.11382.103>46.45>22.08g2-CH3OPhCO0.83471.04>48.05>46.15h3-CH3OPhCO0.83470.829>48.05>57.89i4-CH3OPhCO0.83470.843>48.05>56.93j2-furylCO−0.2092<0.20>44.04>220.2k2-thienylCO0.39130.209>45.65>217.3l3-pyridylCO−0.48620.236>45.14>190.4m2-Cl 3-pyridylCO0.26411.389>48.59>34.983aCH3SO2−0.6042<0.20>42.44>212.2b2-furylSO21.0658>100 (0.419)an/dn/dcPhSO21.34485.469>48.65>8.896d3-CH3PhSO21.8438>100 (1.024)an/dn/de4-CH3PhSO21.8438>100an/dn/dPH-270.63080.466>34.73>74.53LZD0.5321<0.20>33.73>168.6INH−0.6680.034>100>2941aConcentration that inhibited 50% growth of M. tb. (IC50).Table 3
In vivobioavailability of selected oxazolidinones.
Compd.~ MIC (μg/mL) − serum~ MIC (μg/mL) + serumDilution factora~ Compd in serum (μg/mL)Bioavailabilityb1g1.13.31 : 2022low1i3.33.300none1o0.373.300none2b3.33.300none2j1.11.100none2k1.11.100none2l1.10.371 : 1011low3a0.371.100nonePH-271.10.371 : 8088mediumLZD0.370.371 : 320118.4highINH0.0140.0411 : 3204.48highaDilution factor represents the last dilution step of the serum samples in which drug activity was still observed in the bioassay. (Drug levels in mouse serum are estimated by multiplying the dilution factor by the MIC value of the drug in absence of serum).bRating of bioavailability: low: activity of drug can be seen in 1 or 2 wells of the bioassay; medium: activity of drug can be seen in 3 or 4 wells of the bioassay; high: activity of drug can be seen in 5 or 6 wells.Table 4
In vivo efficacy and observation at time of sacrifice.
Compd.LungsSpleenOther remarksControl+++6 enlarged; 1 very large2 with enlarged lymph nodesINH+1 slightly enlarged; 4 normaln/a2l (306019)++1 enlarged; 4 slightly enlargedLarge intestine distended full of feces and air1g (306027)+1 slightly enlarged; 4 normalLarge intestine distended full of feces and airPH-27 (306006)+normalLarge intestine distended full of feces and air+++; highly infected.   ++/+; hardly any infected.         n/a; not applicable.Table 5
In vivo efficacy log10 CFU reduction in bacterial load in lungs and spleen.
Test groupOrganDose mg/Kg/dyMean ± SEM CFULog10CFU reductionActivityUntreatedd13Lungn/a6.90 ± 0.11n/an/aSpleen4.75 ± 0.21Untreatedd22Lungn/a8.06 ± 0.11n/an/aSpleen6.38 ± 0.07INHLung254.77 ± 0.123.29ActiveSpleen2.04 ± 0.384.34Active2l (306019)Lung1507.67 ± 0.220.39InactiveaSpleen6.24 ± 0.060.14Inactivea1g (306027)Lung3007.28 ± 0.140.78Slightly activeSpleen5.95 ± 0.090.43InactiveaPH-27 (306006)Lung1506.62 ± 0.081.44ActiveSpleen4.64 ± 0.211.74Activea306027: slightly active in lung, but activity in spleen was not statistically significant.In this study, interpretation of thein vitro assays (IC90 and VERO cell cytotoxicity: CC50) data assisted in selection of compounds for further testing in vivo. Hence, data from the selectivity index (SI ratio = CC50/IC90, Tables 1 and 2) further indicated that most of the active compounds also displayed acceptable safety and therapeutic index profiles, represented by their SI ranges of >21 to >250. According to the TAACF criteria, compounds with SI value ≥ 10 are considered safe for further screening. In this regard, nine triazolyl oxazolidinones (1g,1i,1o,2b,2j,2k,2l,3a, and PH-27) along with LZD and INH as reference compounds were selected for preliminary bioavailability study. This bioassay was used to estimate the levels of the drug in mice at specific times after oral dosing. From the results presented in Table 3, the reference compounds LZD and INH displayed high concentrations (118.4 and 4.48 μg/mL) of the drugs in mice serum, suggesting high bioavailability of the drugs as demonstrated by the activity against M. tuberculosis H37Rv in 5 or 6 wells. While three of the triazolyl oxazolidinones, namely, 1g (4N-isobutyryl), 2l (4N-nicotinoyl), and PH-27 (morpholino) displayed low to medium concentrations in mice, indicating low-to-medium bioavailability of drugs as demonstrated by activity in only 1 or 2 and 3 or 4 wells of the bioassay, respectively. In addition, the most lipophilic compound, the 4N-undecanoyl derivative 1o(ClogP=3.5568) demonstrated 10 times higher MIC in the presence of serum suggesting that this compound probably has higher protein binding. Although all the other 5 compounds tested also showed relatively insignificant protein binding (Table 3), they also demonstrated no bioavailability similar to that of 4N-undecanoyl derivative 1o. The probable reason(s) for this lack of bioavailability of these other 5 compounds could be due to rapid metabolism and/or poor permeability of the compounds.Finally, thein vivo antimycobacterial activities of the compounds that displayed bioavailability of low to high concentrations were evaluated against gamma knock-out (GKO) C57BL/6 female mice model, which are unable to control aerosol infection with the Erdman strains ATCC 35801. Treatment was initiated 13 days after infection by orally administering the drugs and treatment continued for 9 consecutive days until 21 days. The results of this in vivo study are presented in Tables 4 and 5 following sacrifice of the animals. As can be seen in Table 4, the triazolyl oxazolidinones 1g (306027) and PH-27 (306006) demonstrated efficacy comparable to INH in mice lungs and spleen, while 2l (306019) were less efficacious. Generally, the triazolyl compounds were more effective in lungs. Furthermore, mice treated with the triazolyl oxazolidinones presented with distended large intestine. The morpholino derivative PH-27 was the most active of the triazolyl oxazolidinones tested providing 1.44logCFU reduction in the lung and 1.74log reduction in the spleen. While the 4N-isobutyryl derivative 1g showed 0.78logCFU reduction in the lungs, which was statistically significant, but no statistically significant activity was noted in the spleen. On the contrary, the 4N-nicotinoyl derivative 2l did not show statistically significant logCFU reduction in either lung or spleen with 0.39 and 0.14logCFU (Table 5), respectively. However, the reference compound INH provided 3.29log and 4.34logCFU reduction in lungs and spleen, respectively.The main reason for the significant differences in thein vivo efficacy of these three derivatives 4N-isobutyryl 1g, 4N-nicotinoyl 2l, and morpholino PH-27 is not clear, apart from the obvious differences in the preliminary bioavailability results. Although the bioavailability studies of the efficacious compounds are very preliminary in nature, the efficacy results seem to go well in hand with the reported oral exposure of the compounds. Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that these class of compounds are relatively stable in plasma at physiologic conditions and may bind to plasma protein [18]. In particular, the most probable reasons for lack of bioavailability of the six triazolyl oxazolidinones 1i,1o,2b,2j,2k, and3a may be due to rapid in vivo metabolism and/or poor permeability upon oral administration. Further investigations on these class of compounds and other derivatives including their monoamine oxidase inhibitory activities are ongoing in our laboratories.


## 4. Conclusion

This study discloses thein vitro and in vivoantimycobacterium activity of a series of triazolyl oxazolidinones. Most of the compounds displayed potent in vitro activity against M.  tuberculosis H37Rv, but this in vitro potency was not strongly reflected at the same level in vivo. This could be due to the low bioavailability of the compounds in vivo, however, the precise reason for this is unresolved. In conclusion, these derivatives may serve as templates for further modifications to attain more effective antimycobacterial compounds.



---

*Source: 289136-2012-04-11.xml*