# Numerical Solution of the Kirchhoff Plate Bending Problem with BEM

Authors: V. V. Zozulya
Journal: ISRN Mechanical Engineering
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

Direct approach based on Betty's reciprocal theorem is employed to obtain a general formulation of Kirchhoff plate bending problems in terms of the boundary integral equation (BIE) method. For spatial discretization a collocation method with linear boundary elements (BEs) is adopted. Analytical formulas for regular and divergent integrals calculation are presented. Numerical calculations that illustrate effectiveness of the proposed approach have been done.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The BIE method and its  numerical realization  BEM are powerful tools for analysis of the wide range problems in mechanics and engineering [1, 2]. The main advantage of the BEM in comparison with other numerical methods (e.g., finite element method (FEM)) is that in the BEM only boundary of the domain and unknown functions on it have to be approximated. It leads to reduction of the problem dimension, that is, a 3D problem is transformed to a 2D one, and so forth. As result the amount of calculation is significantly reduced.During the last decade, the BEM has been established as a robust numerical method for solution of the elastic thin plate problems [3]. Various aspects of the BEM application to the problems of thin Kirchhoff’s plates bending have been reported in (see [4–11, 22], etc). In these and other publications calculations the  corresponding integrals have been doing with application of numerical Gaussian’s quadratures. It reduces accuracy and effectiveness of the BEM. In [10, 12] analytical integration has been applied, and exact formulas for the integrals evaluation have been obtained.Another problem which gives many troubles in application of the BEM to the Kirchhoff’s plates bending is the divergent integrals with singularities of the following type: weakly singularO(lnr), strongly singular O(r-1), and hypersingular O(r-2). For their calculation special methods have to be applied. Various methods for divergent integrals regularization have been developed in (see [13–16], etc). Application of the regularization algorithms for the divergent integrals evaluation in the BEM solution of the plate bending problems can be found in [5, 6, 8, 17]. Information related to various aspects of the numerical solution of integral equations can be found in [14, 18, 19] and related to integral calculation numerical using various quadrature formulas in [20, 21].In this paper, we present a general direct BEM approach for thin Kirchhoff’s plate bending problems. For evaluation of the regular integrals we use analytical formulas which give accurate results and need less time for calculation. For divergent integrals regularization we use special method developed in [15, 16]. This method is based on theory of distribution and gives simple analytical equations for evaluation of weakly singular, strongly singular, and hypersingular integrals in the same way. Numerical examples that illustrate effectiveness of the developed BEM for calculation of the thin plate bending problems are presented.


## 2. The Plate Equations

Let us consider thin elastic plate with thickness2h. The plate is subjected by load of the density p(x), transversal to its middle surface Ω, as it is shown on Figure 1. We suppose that deflection of the plate is small in comparison with its thickness, and Kirchhoff’s hypothesis takes place [8].Figure 1
Bending of a thin plate.We consider element that cuts out from the plate by two pairs of planes which are parallel to the planesx1x3 and x2x3 (Figure 2). Then equilibrium of the plate element can be expressed by the equations(1)∂iqi(x)+∂jqj(x)+p(x)=0,∂imij(x)-∂jmj(x)+qj(x)=0,∂jmji(x)+∂imi(x)-qi(x)=0.
Here and further on w is a deflection of the plate, mij are the bending and twisting moments, and qi(x) is a shear force. Indices i,j possess the value 1,2 and correspond to coordinates x1,x2. Arrows on Figure 2 show positive directions of the bending and twisting moments.Figure 2
Elements of the bending plate.From (1) follows inhomogeneous biharmonic differential equation for the deflection of the plate in the form [8] (2)ΔΔw=pD,∀x∈Ω,
where ΔΔ is the biharmonic differential operator, Δ=∂i∂i is the Laplace operator, ∂i=∂/∂xi is the partial derivative with respect to coordinate xi, ν is Poisson’s ratio, D=2Eh2/3(1-ν2) is the plate stiffness, and E is the elastic modulus.The plate deflection is related to other parameters of the plate by relations(3)θi=∂iw,mi,j=-D⌊(1-ν)∂i∂jw+νδij∂k∂kw⌋,qi=-D∂iΔw,
where θi is the slope of the element perpendicular to the middle surface of the plate.Stress-strain state of the plate is defined by stress and strain tensors. Due to Kirchhoff’s hypothesis they are related to the deflection by the equations(4)σij=-x3(λδijΔw+2μ∂i∂jw),εij=x3∂i∂jw.Moments and shear force are expressed through stress tensor in the form(5)mij=∫-hhσijx3dx3,qi=∫-hhσi3x3dx3,(i=1,2).Generalized shear force may be introduced by the relation(6)vn=qn-∂tmt.Correct statement of the plate bending problem supposes that (2) is supplemented by suitable conditions on the boundary ∂Ω. In the Kirchhoff’s theory of plates boundary conditions are usually prescribed to the functions [8](7)w,θn=θini=∂nw,mn=mijninj=-D(∂n∂nw+ν∂t∂tw),vn=qini-∂t(mijnitj)=-D∂n[Δw+(1-ν)∂t2w],
where niиti are the  components of vectors normal and tangential to the boundary ∂Ω, respectively, ∂n=ni∂i and ∂t=ti∂i are normal and tangential derivatives, respectively.For arbitrary part of the boundary we have (see Figure3) (8)mi=mijnj,mn=mini=mijninj,qi=qini,mt=miti=mijnitj,mi=mnni+mtti,θti=θiti,θi=θnni+θtti.Figure 3
Arbitrary part of the boundary.In the case if boundary contains corner points, corner forcesqc which are generated by mt in the points where tangential vector has break have to be taken into account in the expression for vn. Really from the Figure 4 follows that the mt acts on different sides of any angle α in opposite directions and mt- and mt+ related to the different sides of the angle therefore, qc=mt--mt+.Figure 4
Action of the generalized shear force on the corner pint.Under the Kirchhoff assumptions boundary conditions can be defined as follows:(9)w=0,θn=0,clampedcontour(qc=0,wc=0)(10)w=0,mn=0,simply-supportedcontour(qc≠0,wc=0)(11)vn=0,mn=0,freecontour(qc=0,wc≠0)Each of the boundary conditions (9)–(11) together with differential equation for the deflection of the plate (2) represents corresponding boundary value problem.


## 3. Betty’s Reciprocal Theorem and  Elastic Potentials

The boundary-value problems (2), (9)–(11) can be solved by the BIE method. In order to transform a boundary-value problem to the BIE, Betty’s reciprocal theorem can be used in the following form [1, 3]:(12)∫Ωpw′dΩ+∫∂Ω(qnw′+miθi′)dS=∫Ωp′wdΩ+∫∂Ω(qn′w+mi′θi)dS.
In expression (12) functions with accent p′,w′,θn′,mn′,vn′ and without accent p,w,θn,mn,vn are  parameters of two different states of the elastic plate, respectively.Let us transform (12) to the form suitable for the case of presence mentioned above corner points. For that purpose we consider series of integral transformations(13)∫Ωmiθi′dS=∫∂Ω(mnni+mtti)(θn′ni+θt′ti)dS=∫∂Ω(mnθn′+mtθt′)dS=∫∂Ω(mnθn′+mt∂tw′)dS.
Last integral in (13) can be represented in the form(14)∫∂Ωmt∂tw′dS=∫∂Ω∂t(mtw′)dS-∫∂Ω∂tmtw′dS.
For close contour the first right integral in (14) is equal to (15)I=∫∂Ω∂t(mtw′)dS=∫∂Ωd(mtw′)dS=0.
For contour with corner points (16)I=mt-w′-mt+w=(mt--mt+)w=qcwc′.
Finally integral (13) can be presented in the form (17)∫∂Ωmiθi′dS=∫∂Ω(mnθn′-∂tmtw′)dS+qcwc′.In the same way can be transformed integral(18)∫∂Ωmi′θidS=∫∂Ω(mn′θn-∂tmt′w)dS+qc′wc.With taking into account representations (17) and (18) Betty’s reciprocal relation (12) can be extended for the case of the corner points presence and can be represented in the form (19)∫Ωpw′dΩ+∫∂Ω(vnw′+mnθn′)dS+qcwc′=∫Ωp′wdΩ+∫∂Ω(vn′w+mn′θn)dS+qc′wc.From Betty’s reciprocal relation (13) one can obtain Somigliano’s type identity for the deflection of the plate w. To do that we choose as the first state of plate (without accent) that state, which has to be calculated. The second state of the plate (with accent) is auxiliary and correspond to infinite plate subjected to action of the concentrated force of unit density that applied at point x in the direction  normal to the middle surface. Functions that correspond to the second state are fundamental solutions for the plate. For convenience the following notations will be used: (20)p′=δ(y,x),w′=W(y,x),θn′=Θ(y,x),mn′=M(y,x),vn′=V(y,x).Taking into account that Dirac’s delta functionδ(x,y) transform regular functions in the following way: (21)∫Ωw(y)δ(y,x)dΩ=w(x),
Betty’s reciprocal relation (19) can be transformed to the Somigliano’s type identity for the plate deflection (22)w(x)=∫∂Ω[vn(y)W(y,x)+mn(y)Θ(y,x)-θn(y)M(y,x)-w(y)V(y,x)]dS+∫Ωp(y)W(y,x)dΩ+∑k=1K(qcWc(y,x)-Mc(y,x)wc)k,∀x∈R2∖∂Ω.
Here K is the number of corner points on the contour of the plate ∂Ω.The slope of the element perpendicular to the middle surface of the plateθn(x) can be obtained applying operator of the normal derivative ∂n to (22). We assume that point x∈R2∖∂Ω and therefore kernels in (22) are sufficiently smooth and differentiation with respect to parameter x is correct. As result we obtain (23)θn(x)=∫∂Ω[vn(y)Wn(y,x)+mn(y)Θn(y,x)-θn(y)Mn(y,x)-w(y)Vn(y,x)]dS+∫Ωp(y)Wn(y,x)dΩ+∑k=1K(qcWnc(y,x)-Mnc(y,x)∂nwc)k,∀x∈R2∖∂Ω.
The kernels Wn, Θn, Mn, and Vn can be obtained by applying operator of the normal derivative ∂n with respect to x to corresponding fundamental solutions in (22).Further in order to construct BIE limit transition to the boundaryx→∂Ω will be done.For convenience and compactness of the BIE consideration we introduce the following contour and area potentials:(24)W(vn,x,∂Ω)=∫∂Ωvn(y)W(y,x)dS,Θ(mn,x,∂Ω)=∫∂Ωmn(y)Θ(y,x)dS,M(θn,x,∂Ω)=∫∂Ωθn(y)M(y,x)dS,V(w,x,∂Ω)=∫∂Ωw(y)V(y,x)dS,Wn(vn,x,∂Ω)=∫∂Ωvn(y)Wn(y,x)dS,Θn(mn,x,∂Ω)=∫∂Ωmn(y)Θn(y,x)dS,(25)Mn(θn,x,∂Ω)=∫∂Ωθn(y)Mn(y,x)dS,Vn(w,x,∂Ω)=∫∂Ωw(y)Vn(y,x)dS,W(p,x,Ω)=∫Ωp(y)W(y,x)dΩ,Wn(p,x,Ω)=∫Ωp(y)Wn(y,x)dΩ.Now with taking into account (23) и (25) integral representations, (22) и (23) can be written in the form(26)w(x)=W(vn,x,∂Ω)+Θ(mn,x,∂Ω)-M(θn,x,∂Ω)-V(w,x,∂Ω)+W(p,x,Ω)+∑k=1K(qcWc(y,x)-Mc(y,x)wc)k,∀x∈R2∖∂Ωθn(x)=Wn(vn,x,∂Ω)+Θn(mn,x,∂Ω)-Mn(θn,x,∂Ω)-Vn(w,x,∂Ω)+Wn(p,x,Ω)+∑k=1K(qcWnc(y,x)-Mnc(y,x)∂nwc)k,∀x∈R2∖∂Ω.


## 4. Fundamental Solutions

Fundamental solutionW(y,x) for static plate bending is the solution of the differential equation (27)DΔΔ(y)W(y,x)=δ(y,x),∀x∈R2,
where ΔΔ(y) is the biharmonic differential operator with respect to y(y1,y2) defined in (2).Solution of (27) has the form (28)W(y,x)=18πDr2ln⁡⁡r,
where r=(y1-x1)2+(y2-x2)2 is the distance between points y and xFundamental solutionsΘ(y,x), M(y,x) and V(y,x) from the integral representation (22) can be calculated applying differential operators (3) to W(y,x) with taking into account (6) and direction of the unit vector n(y)(see Figure 5).Figure 5The fundamental  solutionsΘ(y,x), M(y,x), V(y,x) have the form(29)Θ(y,x)=-r8πD∂r∂n(1+2ln⁡⁡r),M(y,x)=-18π[2(∂2r∂n2+ν∂2r∂t2)+(1+ν)(1+2ln⁡⁡r)],V(y,x)=r4π∂r∂n[5-ν-2(∂2r∂n2+(2-ν)∂2r∂t2)].Fundamental solutionsWn(y,x), Θn(y,x), Mn(y,x), and Vn(y,x), from the integral representation (23) can be calculated applying operator of the normal derivative ∂n with respect to x to W(y,x), Θ(y,x), M(y,x), and V(y,x) from (28) and (29) with taking into direction of the unit vector n(x) (Figure 5).Finally the fundamental solutionsWn(y,x), Θn(y,x), Mn(y,x), and Vn(y,x) can be represented in the form(30)Wn(y,x)=-y28πD(1+2ln⁡⁡r),Θn(y,x)=-18πD(2y2r∂r∂n-(1+2ln⁡⁡r)cos⁡⁡γ),Mn(y,x)=-14πr2[(∂2r∂n2+ν∂2r∂t2)2r(∂r∂ncos⁡⁡γ-ν∂r∂tsin⁡γ)-y2(1+ν)+2y2(∂2r∂n2+ν∂2r∂t2)],Vn(y,x)=-14πr2[+2r(2-ν)+∂r∂t(∂r∂tcos⁡⁡γ-2∂r∂nsin⁡γ)(ν-5)(rcos⁡⁡γ+2y2∂r∂nsin⁡γ)×6r∂2r∂n2cos⁡⁡γ+8y2∂r∂n×(∂2r∂n2+(2-ν)∂2r∂t2)+2r(2-ν)+∂r∂t(∂r∂tcos⁡⁡γ-2∂r∂nsin⁡γ)(ν-5)(rcos⁡⁡γ+2y2∂r∂nsin⁡γ)].
Here γ is the angle between normal vector n(x) and axis y2, counted from n(x) clockwise.Analysis of (28)–(30) shows that with x→y(31)W(y,x)⟶r2ln⁡⁡r,Θ(y,x)⟶rln⁡⁡r,M(y,x)⟶ln⁡⁡r,V(y,x)⟶r-1,Wn(y,x)⟶rln⁡⁡r,Θn(y,x)⟶ln⁡⁡r,Mn(y,x)⟶r-1,Vn(y,x)⟶r-2.
From (31) it follows that for x→y kernels W(y,x), Θ(y,x) and Wn(y,x) are continuous, kernels M(y,x)иΘn(y,x) are weakly singular, kernels V(y,x)иMn(y,x) are strongly singular, and kernel Vn(y,x) is hypersingular. Potentials with continuous kernels W(vn,x,∂Ω), Θ(mn,x,∂Ω), and Wn(vn,x,∂Ω) can be considered in usual (Riemann or Lebegue) sense, potentials with weakly singular kernels M(θn,x,∂Ω) and Θn(mn,x,∂Ω) can be considered as improper, potentials with strongly singular kernels V(w,x,∂Ω), and Mn(θn,x,∂Ω) have to be considered in the sense of Cauchy principal values and potential with hypersingular kernel in sense of Hadamard’s finite part Vn(w,x,∂Ω) (see [2, 5, 6, 19, 21]).Forx→∂Ω above-mentioned singularities may arise in the boundary potentials (24) and therefore not all of them cross the boundary continuously. Boundary properties of these potentials have been well studied in (see [1, 3], etc). Therefore, only final results will be discussed here. These are expressed by the equations (32)W(vn,x,∂Ω)±=W(vn,x,∂Ω)0,Θ(mn,x,∂Ω)±=Θ(mn,x,∂Ω)0,M(θn,x,∂Ω)±=M(θn,x,∂Ω)0,V(w,x,∂Ω)±=∓12w(x)+V(w,x,∂Ω)0,Wn(vn,x,∂Ω)±=Wn(vn,x,∂Ω)0,Θn(mn,x,∂Ω)±=Θn(mn,x,∂Ω)0,Mn(θn,x,∂Ω)±=±12θn+Mn(θn,x,∂Ω)0Vn(w,x,∂Ω)±=V(w,x,∂Ω)0.
Here symbols “∓” and “∓” denote that two equalities, one with upper and the other with lower signs, are considered. The sign “0” indicates that the direct value of the corresponding potentials on the boundary ∂Ω should be taken.


## 5. Boundary Integral Equations for Boundary-Value Problems

In order to get integral representations for the deflection of the platew(x) and slope of the element perpendicular to the middle surface of the plate θn(x) on the boundary ∂Ω limit transition x→∂Ω has to be done. With taking into account boundary properties of the elastic potentials (32) on smooth parts of the boundary the following equations can be obtained:(33)12w(x)=W(vn,x,∂Ω)+Θ(mn,x,∂Ω)-M(θn,x,∂Ω)-V(w,x,∂Ω)+W(p,x,Ω),∀x∈∂Ω,12θn(x)=Wn(vn,x,∂Ω)+Θn(mn,x,∂Ω)-Mn(θn,x,∂Ω)-Vn(w,x,∂Ω)+Wn(p,x,Ω),∀x∈∂Ω.
For simplicity in this section we did not take into account corner point.For any boundary-value problem (2), (9)–(11) can be constructed corresponding BIE based on boundary integral representations (33). Several examples of the BIE that correspond to main boundary-value problems for plates  are presented bellow.Boundary-Value Problem (2), (9)One has(34)W(vn,x,∂Ω)+Θ(mn,x,∂Ω)+W(p,x,Ω)=0,∀x∈∂ΩWn(vn,x,∂Ω)+Θn(mn,x,∂Ω)+Wn(p,x,Ω)=0,∀x∈∂Ω.This system of the BIE is the system of Fredholm integral equations of the first kind with smooth kernels. Such integral equations correspond the so-called ill-posed problems [19]. Different kind of instability can occur during their numerical solution. For their correct solution special regularization technique has to be applied [19].Boundary Value Problem (2), (10)One has(35)W(vn,x,∂Ω)+M(θn,x,∂Ω)+W(p,x,Ω)=0,∀x∈∂ΩWn(vn,x,∂Ω)-12θn(x)-Mn(θn,x,∂Ω)+Wn(p,x,Ω)=0,∀x∈∂Ω.This system of the BIE consists of the Fredholm integral equation of the first kind with smooth kernels and singular integral equation. Specific features of the Fredholm integral equation solution have been considered above. Singular integral equations can be solved using technique developed in [14] of the divergent integrals regularization. In process of the system of integral equations (35) solution specific features of both equations have to be taken into account.Boundary Value Problem (2), (10)One has(36)12w(x)+V(w,x,∂Ω)+M(θn,x,∂Ω)=W(p,x,Ω),∀x∈∂Ωc12θn(x)+Mn(θn,x,∂Ω)+Vn(w,x,∂Ω)=Wn(p,x,Ω),∀x∈∂Ωc.Integral operations in this system of integral equations contain kernels with different singularities. Integrals with logarithmic singularitylnr are weakly singular, they can be consider as improper. Integrals with singularity r-1 are strongly  singular and have to be considered in the sense of Cauchy principle value. Integrals with singularity r-2 are hypersingular and have to be considered in the sense of Hadamard’s finite part. For more information about divergent integrals and their application in BIE one can refer to [5, 6, 8, 13–16] and references here.In each specific case corresponding system of BIE can be easily constructed based on (34)–(36).


## 6. BEM and Approximation of the Region  and Functions

The BEM can be treated as the approximate method for the BIE solution, which includes approximation of the functions and the domain where they are defined by discrete finite dimensional model. Let us construct discrete model the plate boundary∂Ω∈R. We fix in the ∂Ω finite number of points xg(g=1,…,G). These points are refered to as global nodes points V(g)={xg∈∂Ω:g=1,…,G}.We shall divide the boundary∂Ω into finite number of subdomains ∂Ωn(n=1,…,N), such that they satisfy the following conditions: (37)∂Ωm∩∂Ωk=∅,(ecлиm≠k),∂Ω=⋃k=1N∂Ωk.On each FE we introduce a local coordinate systemξ. We designate the nodal points xq∈Vn in the local system of coordinates by ξq. They are coordinates of the nodal points in the local coordinate system. Local and global coordinate are related in the following way:(38)xq=∑n=1NΛnξnq.
Functions Λn depend on position of the nodal points in the BE. They join individual BE together in the BE model. Borders of the BEs and position of the nodal points should be such that, after joining together, separate elements form discrete model of the plate boundary ∂Ω.Having constructed BE model of the areaΩ, we can consider approximation of the function f(x) that belong to some functional space. The BE model of the boundary ∂Ω is the domain of function which should be approximated. We denote function f(x) on the BE Ωn by fn(x). Then(39)f(x)=∑n=1Nfn(x).
On each BE the local functions fn(x) may be represented in the form (40)fn(x)≈∑q=1Qfn(xq)φnq(ξ),
where φnq(ξ) are interpolation polynomials or shape functions on the BE with number n. In nodal point with coordinates xq they are equal to 1 and in other nodal points are equal to zero. Taking into account (39) and (40) global approximation of the function f(x) looks like(41)f(x)≈∑n=1N∑q=1Qfn(xq)φnq(ξ).
If the nodal point q belongs to several FEs it is considered in these sums only once.In general case BEs can be of different shape and size with different shape functions defined on them. The simplest are linear BE with piecewise constant shape functions as it is shown in Figure6.Figure 6
Linear BE.For linear BE and piecewise constant shape functions corresponding integrals can be calculated analytically. It can significantly simplify calculations, reduce time, and increase accuracy and stability of the calculation process. Advantages of application curvilinear BE and high-order shape functions consist in more accurate approximation of the boundary and functions, but it leads to complication of calculations. Some time that circumstance can devalue the above-mentioned advantages. For more information regarding advantages and disadvantages of different BEs and function approximation refer to [1, 2]. Taking into account all the above we use here the linear BE and the piecewise constant shape functions.Let us divide boundary∂Ω into N curvilinear BE ∂Ωn, which satisfy conditions (37). Replacing curvilinear BE by linear ones as it is shown in Figure 6, we obtain discrete approximation of the plate boundary by linear segments of the length 2Δn. In accordance with model that has been used here w(x),θn(x), mn(x)иvn(x) are constant on each BE.In order to calculate integrals over domain in (25) we divide domain Ω into L triangular elements as it is shown in Figure 7.Figure 7
Discretization of the domainΩ.Therefore, finite dimensional system of the BEM equations has the form(42)12w(xm)=∑k=1N[vn(yk)W(xmyk)+mn(yk)Θ(xmyk)-θn(yk)M(xmyk)-w(yk)V(xmyk)]dS+∑l=1LW(xm,yl,p)+∑K[qcwc],∀x∈∂Ωn,(43)12θn(xm)=∑k=1N[vn(yk)Wn(xmyk)+mn(yk)Θn(xmyk)-θn(yk)Mn(xmyk)-w(yk)Vn(xmyk)]dS+∑l=1LWn(xm,yl,p)+∑K[qc∂nwc],∀x∈∂Ωn,
where(44)W(xm,yk)=∫∂ΩkW(y,xm)dS,Θ(xm,yk)=∫∂ΩkΘ(y,xm)dS,Θ(xm,yk)=∫∂ΩkΘ(y,xm)dS,Θ(xm,yk)=∫∂ΩkΘ(y,xm)dS,Wn(xm,yk)=∫∂ΩkWn(y,xm)dS,Θn(xm,yk)=∫∂ΩkΘn(y,xm)dS,(45)Mn(xm,yk)=∫∂ΩkMn(y,xm)dS,Vn(xm,yk)=∫∂ΩkVn(y,xm)dS,W(xm,yl,p)=∫Ωlp(y)W(y,xm)dΩ,Wn(xm,yl,p)=∫Ωlp(y)Wn(y,xm)dΩ.System of (42) consist of 2N+K equations, where 2N corresponds to number of BEs and K corresponds to number corner points. For convenience it can be presented in the matrix form (46)12|wθn|=|[W][Θ][Wn][Θn]|⋅|[vn][mn]|-|[M][V][Mn][Vn]|⋅|[θn][w]|+|[W][Wn]|⋅|[p][p]|
or (47)[A]⋅{X}=[P].
Here [A] is the matrix of the dimension (2N+K)·(2N+K) that depends on boundary conditions, elements of which are functions defined by (44), X is column vector of unknown functions of the dimension 2N+K, P and is column vector of known functions of the dimension 2N+K which depend on boundary conditions, external load, and discretization of the domain Ω and its boundary ∂Ω.For any specific external load and boundary conditions from system (46) can be constructed system (47). Matrix A and vector P can be calculated using (44).


## 7. Calculation Integrals over Boundary and  Domain Elements

There are two approaches to calculation of integrals (44) over the BE. The first one explores numerical calculations using quadrature formulas. The second one consists in analytical integrations of corresponding integrals.Numerically integrals over boundary elements are usually calculated using the Gaussian quadrature formulas [20, 21](48)∫abp(y)f(y)dx≅∑q=1Qωqf(yq)+R(f),
where Q is the number of nodes, [a,b] is any finite or infinite segment of the real line, yq are coordinates of the nodes, ωq is the weighting factor, p(y) is the weighting function, and R(f) is the remainder of the quadrature. It is necessary that product of functions f(y) and p(y) is integrable on [a,b]. The coordinates yq of nodes and the weighting factor ωq can be found in [20, 21].The Gaussian quadrature formulas can be effectively applied for calculation of the integrals without singularities, in the case of integrals (44) only for xm∉∂Ωk. In the case of singular boundary elements, when xm∈∂Ωk, formulas (48) cannot be applied. In this case special regularization technique has to be applied.Let us introduce the system of coordinates that related to the  BE with numberm; axis x1 coincides with that BE and axis x2 is perpendicular to it, as it is shown in Figure 6. Calculation of the regular and divergent integral will be done in that system of coordinates.


### 7.1. Calculation of the Divergent Integrals

In the above mentioned system of coordinates, the local coordinates of the pointsxk and ym have the form(49)x1m=0,x2m=0,y1m=t,y2m=0,
where t∈[-Δm,Δm] is a local coordinate.Therefore, fundamental solutions on the singular boundary element have the form [17](50)W(xm,y)=18πDt2ln⁡⁡|t|,M(xm,y)=-18π[2ν+(1+ν)(1+2ln⁡⁡|t|)],Θn(xm,y)=-18πD(1+2ln⁡⁡|t|),Vn(xm,y)=1+ν4πt2,Θ(xm,y)=V(xm,y)=Wn(xm,y)=Mn(xm,y)=0.Integrals in (50) are not complicate and can be calculated analytically using regularization technique developed in [16]. As result we obtain (51)W(xm,ym)=Δm336πD(3ln⁡⁡Δm-1),M(xm,ym)=-Δm4π[ν-1+2(1+ν)ln⁡⁡Δm],Θn(xm,ym)=-Δm4D(2ln⁡⁡Δm-1),Vn(xm,ym)=1-ν2πΔm.In (51) it has been  taken into account that integral containing kernel W is regular and no special consideration is needed. The integrals containing kernels M and Θn are strongly singular; they have to be considered in the sense of Cauchy principle value. The integral containing kernel V is hypersingular; it has to be considered in the sense of Hadamard’ finite part. For more information refer to [13, 14, 22].


### 7.2. Calculation of the Regular Integrals

In the system of coordinates presented in Figure6 coordinates of point xk and y are(52)x1m=0,y1=y1k+tcos⁡γ,x2m=0,y2=y2k-tsinγ,
where y1k, y2k are coordinates of the middle of the BE with number k, γ is the angle between vectors nm and nk that are perpendicular to the BEs with numbers m and k, respectively counted in clockwise direction. Fundamental solutions in this case are regular and are presented by (28)–(30). After analytical integration they can be presented in the following form [17]:(53)W(xm,yk)=18πD(r2I1+2BI2+I3),Θ(xm,yk)=C4πD(I1+Δk),M(xm,yk)=-14π((1+ν)(I1+Δk)+I1,0(C2+νB2)+2I1,1νB+I1,2ν),V(xm,yk)=-C4π[I1,0(5-ν)-2I2,0(C2+νB2(2-ν))-2(2-ν)(2I2,1νB+I2,2)],W(xm,yk)=-14πD(y2(I1+Δk)-I2sin⁡γ),Θn(xm,yk)=-14πD×[-(I1+Δk)cos⁡⁡γ+C(I1,0y2-I1,1sin⁡γ)];(54)Mn(xm,yk)=-14π[I1,0(2Bsin⁡γ-2Ccos⁡⁡γ-(1+ν)y2+I1,1(1+3νcos⁡⁡γ))+2I2,0y2(C2+B2ν)+2I2,0y2(C2+B2ν)+2I2,1×(2Bνy2-(C2+B2ν)sinγ)+2I2,2ν(y2-2Bsinγ),-2I2,3νsinγ],Vn(xm,yk)=-14π[I1,0(ν-5)cos⁡⁡γ+2I2,0(C(5-ν)y2+B(2-ν)×(Bcos⁡γ-2Csin⁡γ)+3C2cos⁡⁡γ)+2I2,1(-C(5-ν)sin⁡γ+2(2-ν)×(Bcos⁡⁡γ-Csin⁡γ))+2I2,2(2-ν)×cos⁡⁡γ-8I3,0Cy2(C2+(2-ν)B2)-8I3,1C(-C2sin⁡γ+B(2-ν)×(2y2-Bsin⁡γ))-8I3,2(2-ν)×(y2-2Bsin⁡γ)×C+8I3,3C(2-ν)sin⁡γ].
Here B=y1cosγ-y2sinγ,D=arctg(Δk+B)/C-arctg(-Δk+B)/C,C=y1sinγ+y2cosγ,(55)F=F1F2=ln⁡⁡|Δk2+2BΔk+r2||Δk2-2BΔk+r2|,r=|y-x|=(y12+y22)1/2,In,m=∫-ΔkΔktmdt(t2+2Bt+r2)n,n=1,2,3,m=1,2,3,In=∫-ΔkΔktnln⁡⁡rdt,n=0,1,2.


### 7.3. Calculation of the Domain Integrals

In the BIE can appear also domain integrals (25), which are used to take into account action of the load distributed over domain on the plate. They are regular and can be calculated numerically using the Gaussian quadratures [20, 21].In order to calculate integrals over domainΩ we divide it into L triangular elements as it is shown in Figure 7. Integrals in (45) over triangle can be calculated in the form (56)W(xm,yl,p)=∑q=1Qp(yq)W(xm,yq)ωq,Wn(xm,yl,p)=∑q=1Qp(yq)Wn(xm,yq)ωq,∀xm∈Ω,
where yq are coordinates of nodes on the triangular element, ωq is the weighting factor. Coordinates yq of nodes and weighting factor ωq for triangle can be found in [20, 21].


## 7.1. Calculation of the Divergent Integrals

In the above mentioned system of coordinates, the local coordinates of the pointsxk and ym have the form(49)x1m=0,x2m=0,y1m=t,y2m=0,
where t∈[-Δm,Δm] is a local coordinate.Therefore, fundamental solutions on the singular boundary element have the form [17](50)W(xm,y)=18πDt2ln⁡⁡|t|,M(xm,y)=-18π[2ν+(1+ν)(1+2ln⁡⁡|t|)],Θn(xm,y)=-18πD(1+2ln⁡⁡|t|),Vn(xm,y)=1+ν4πt2,Θ(xm,y)=V(xm,y)=Wn(xm,y)=Mn(xm,y)=0.Integrals in (50) are not complicate and can be calculated analytically using regularization technique developed in [16]. As result we obtain (51)W(xm,ym)=Δm336πD(3ln⁡⁡Δm-1),M(xm,ym)=-Δm4π[ν-1+2(1+ν)ln⁡⁡Δm],Θn(xm,ym)=-Δm4D(2ln⁡⁡Δm-1),Vn(xm,ym)=1-ν2πΔm.In (51) it has been  taken into account that integral containing kernel W is regular and no special consideration is needed. The integrals containing kernels M and Θn are strongly singular; they have to be considered in the sense of Cauchy principle value. The integral containing kernel V is hypersingular; it has to be considered in the sense of Hadamard’ finite part. For more information refer to [13, 14, 22].


## 7.2. Calculation of the Regular Integrals

In the system of coordinates presented in Figure6 coordinates of point xk and y are(52)x1m=0,y1=y1k+tcos⁡γ,x2m=0,y2=y2k-tsinγ,
where y1k, y2k are coordinates of the middle of the BE with number k, γ is the angle between vectors nm and nk that are perpendicular to the BEs with numbers m and k, respectively counted in clockwise direction. Fundamental solutions in this case are regular and are presented by (28)–(30). After analytical integration they can be presented in the following form [17]:(53)W(xm,yk)=18πD(r2I1+2BI2+I3),Θ(xm,yk)=C4πD(I1+Δk),M(xm,yk)=-14π((1+ν)(I1+Δk)+I1,0(C2+νB2)+2I1,1νB+I1,2ν),V(xm,yk)=-C4π[I1,0(5-ν)-2I2,0(C2+νB2(2-ν))-2(2-ν)(2I2,1νB+I2,2)],W(xm,yk)=-14πD(y2(I1+Δk)-I2sin⁡γ),Θn(xm,yk)=-14πD×[-(I1+Δk)cos⁡⁡γ+C(I1,0y2-I1,1sin⁡γ)];(54)Mn(xm,yk)=-14π[I1,0(2Bsin⁡γ-2Ccos⁡⁡γ-(1+ν)y2+I1,1(1+3νcos⁡⁡γ))+2I2,0y2(C2+B2ν)+2I2,0y2(C2+B2ν)+2I2,1×(2Bνy2-(C2+B2ν)sinγ)+2I2,2ν(y2-2Bsinγ),-2I2,3νsinγ],Vn(xm,yk)=-14π[I1,0(ν-5)cos⁡⁡γ+2I2,0(C(5-ν)y2+B(2-ν)×(Bcos⁡γ-2Csin⁡γ)+3C2cos⁡⁡γ)+2I2,1(-C(5-ν)sin⁡γ+2(2-ν)×(Bcos⁡⁡γ-Csin⁡γ))+2I2,2(2-ν)×cos⁡⁡γ-8I3,0Cy2(C2+(2-ν)B2)-8I3,1C(-C2sin⁡γ+B(2-ν)×(2y2-Bsin⁡γ))-8I3,2(2-ν)×(y2-2Bsin⁡γ)×C+8I3,3C(2-ν)sin⁡γ].
Here B=y1cosγ-y2sinγ,D=arctg(Δk+B)/C-arctg(-Δk+B)/C,C=y1sinγ+y2cosγ,(55)F=F1F2=ln⁡⁡|Δk2+2BΔk+r2||Δk2-2BΔk+r2|,r=|y-x|=(y12+y22)1/2,In,m=∫-ΔkΔktmdt(t2+2Bt+r2)n,n=1,2,3,m=1,2,3,In=∫-ΔkΔktnln⁡⁡rdt,n=0,1,2.


## 7.3. Calculation of the Domain Integrals

In the BIE can appear also domain integrals (25), which are used to take into account action of the load distributed over domain on the plate. They are regular and can be calculated numerically using the Gaussian quadratures [20, 21].In order to calculate integrals over domainΩ we divide it into L triangular elements as it is shown in Figure 7. Integrals in (45) over triangle can be calculated in the form (56)W(xm,yl,p)=∑q=1Qp(yq)W(xm,yq)ωq,Wn(xm,yl,p)=∑q=1Qp(yq)Wn(xm,yq)ωq,∀xm∈Ω,
where yq are coordinates of nodes on the triangular element, ωq is the weighting factor. Coordinates yq of nodes and weighting factor ωq for triangle can be found in [20, 21].


## 8. Numerical Examples

We have considered here some benchmark examples that correspond to bending of the thin plates of different shape. In all examples the ratio2h/R=0.1 has been used.


### 8.1. Calculation of the Circular Plate

First let us consider circular simply supported over-the-contour plate that subjected to action the uniformly distributed over the domainΩ load. For this case analytical solution has the form [23] (57)w(ρ)=Pρ216D(1+ν)(ρ2-R2),
where ρ is the radial polar coordinate, R is the radius of the plate.Expressions forθn, mn, vn can be obtained from (57) applying differential operators (3). Dependence of the accuracy of the BEM on number N of the BE has been studied here. In all occurrences for approximation of the domain Ω it was divided by 288 triangular elements. Results of calculations of the unknown boundary data are presented on Figure 8, where curve 1 corresponds to analytical solution, curve 2 corresponds to Δθn=θnappr/θnextact, and curve 3 corresponds to Δvn=vnappr/vnextact, respectively.Figure 8
Dependence of the boundary dataΔθn and Δvn on number of the BE.Analysis of the data presented in Figure8 shows that generalized shear force vn is calculated more accurately. For example, calculation accuracy to within 5% for vn is reached for N=13, whereas the same accuracy for the slope of the element perpendicular to the middle surface θn is reached for N=24.In order to compare traditional and proposed here analytical approach, evaluation of integrals (44) using the Gaussian quadratures (48) and presented here equations (52) has been done for circular simply supported over-the-contour plate. In both cases divergent integrals have been calculated using (50) and N=32 rectilinear BE. Time for calculation of the above-mentioned integrals in traditional approach has to be four times longer in order to reach the same accuracy as in proposed here analytical approach.


### 8.2. Calculation of the Rectangular Plate

We consider here some benchmark examples for rectangular plate with different boundary conditions. In the first example plate was loaded by concentrated force applied to the point in its center. In all other examples the plate was loaded by uniformly distributed over the domainΩ load. Boundary conditions and load are presented in the first column of Tables 1–6. For all presented here examples solution obtained by BEM was compared with existing analytical solution, which can be presented in the form of Fourier series [23].Table 1Loading patternNumber of BEPointsBoundary conditionsΔtΔwmaxΔwΔθnΔMnΔVn201—0.947—0.8133.2910.845361—0.987—0.9774.2240.938441—0.994—0.9914.6570.955Table 2Loading patternNumber of BEPointsBoundary conditionsΔtΔwmaxΔwΔθnΔMnΔVn201—0.940—0.8493.8310.950361—0.985—0.9803.9520.983441—0.993—0.9934.1540.988Table 3Loading patternNumber of BEPointsBoundary conditionsΔtΔwmaxΔwΔθnΔMnΔVn201——0.9560.9974.2510.995361——0.9900.9975.4620.996441——0.9950.9995.5640.998Table 4Loading patternNumber of BEPointsBoundary conditionsΔtΔwmaxΔwΔθnΔMnΔVn201—0.935—0.9972.6310.9692——0.9450.968361—0.985—0.9904.5290.9892——0.9870.997441—0.993—0.9924.7610.9922——0.9941.000Table 5Loading patternNumber of BEPointsBoundary conditionsΔtΔwmaxΔwΔθnΔMnΔVn201——0.9450.9673.6710.9702—0.937—0.926361——0.9870.9984.2390.9992—0.985—0.995441——0.9940.9994.2810.9962—0.993—0.993Table 6Loading patternNumber of BEPointsBoundary conditionsΔtΔwmaxΔwΔθnΔMnΔVn2010.9470.995——4.1710.9362—0.937—0.8173610.9800.998——4.2190.9762—0.984—0.9734410.9930.999——4.4610.9832—0.992—0.995Columns 4–7 of Tables1–6 show Δw,Δθn,Δmn,Δvn—the ratio of the unknown boundary conditions for different values of N to the values obtained analytically at points 1 and 2 for the schemes presented in the column 1. This data can be used to optimize the number of the BE depending on the required accuracy for different boundary conditions. According to our estimates, the value N=40 can be recommended in calculations performed for different combinations of boundary conditions and loading schemes. Here, the error in the calculation of the unknown boundary conditions does not exceed 1%. Column 9 of Tables 1–6 shows values of Δwmax—ratio of the maximum deflection calculated by the BEM to the corresponding values obtained analytically [23]. With number of the BE equal to N=40, the error is no greater than 1.7% for any variant of boundary conditions and loading presented in Tables 1–6 except the first one. It is equal to 4.5% for the first case, which can be attributed to the inaccuracy of approximation of the concentrated force.Integrals in (44) have been calculated numerically using the Gaussian quadratures (48) and analytically using presented here equations (52). An important fact testifying to the expediency of use of the presented here equations for analytical integration (52) for calculation of the coefficients of system (47) is the reduction of the computational time. Column 8 of the Tables 1–6 shows values of Δt—the ratio of the time required to construct the system of the linear algebraic equations (47) analytically using (52) and numerically using the Gaussian quadratures. Studies have shown that use of the approach proposed here makes it possible to cut the time required to obtain solution the problem by the factor from 2.5 to 5. This is particularly important when the calculations have to be performed repeatedly, such as in the solution of the dynamic and nonlinear problems. The amount of time saved depends mainly on the number of the BE approximating the boundary, as well as on the type of boundary conditions.In order to visualize results from Tables1–6 also Figures 9–14 are presented. They complement data from the corresponding tables and present them in more convenient and visual form.Figure 9
Dependence of the boundary data and time of calculations on number of the BE.Figure 10
Dependence of the boundary data and time of calculations on number of the BE.Figure 11
Dependence of the boundary data and time of calculations on number of the BE.Figure 12
Dependence of the boundary data and time of calculations on number of the BE.Figure 13
Dependence of the boundary data and time of calculations on number of the BE.Figure 14
Dependence of the boundary data and time of calculations on number of the BE.


### 8.3. Calculation of the T-Shaped Plate

The diagram of the T-shaped plate together with boundary conditions is presented in Figure15. The plate is subjected to action of the uniformly distributed over the domain Ω load of the magnitude q. Material properties of the plate have been calculated from the equation (qa4)/(Eh4)=100 and Poisson ratio υ=0.3.Figure 15
T-shaped plate.In Figure16 are presented distributions of the values σxa2/4Eh2 and w/h for the cross-section with coordinate x2=0 and for number of the BesN=96. The solid line corresponds to the BEM and dash line to FEM solutions, respectively.Figure 16From this data follows that results obtained by the BEM and by the FEM are in a good agreement but time of calculation by the BEM is significantly less.


## 8.1. Calculation of the Circular Plate

First let us consider circular simply supported over-the-contour plate that subjected to action the uniformly distributed over the domainΩ load. For this case analytical solution has the form [23] (57)w(ρ)=Pρ216D(1+ν)(ρ2-R2),
where ρ is the radial polar coordinate, R is the radius of the plate.Expressions forθn, mn, vn can be obtained from (57) applying differential operators (3). Dependence of the accuracy of the BEM on number N of the BE has been studied here. In all occurrences for approximation of the domain Ω it was divided by 288 triangular elements. Results of calculations of the unknown boundary data are presented on Figure 8, where curve 1 corresponds to analytical solution, curve 2 corresponds to Δθn=θnappr/θnextact, and curve 3 corresponds to Δvn=vnappr/vnextact, respectively.Figure 8
Dependence of the boundary dataΔθn and Δvn on number of the BE.Analysis of the data presented in Figure8 shows that generalized shear force vn is calculated more accurately. For example, calculation accuracy to within 5% for vn is reached for N=13, whereas the same accuracy for the slope of the element perpendicular to the middle surface θn is reached for N=24.In order to compare traditional and proposed here analytical approach, evaluation of integrals (44) using the Gaussian quadratures (48) and presented here equations (52) has been done for circular simply supported over-the-contour plate. In both cases divergent integrals have been calculated using (50) and N=32 rectilinear BE. Time for calculation of the above-mentioned integrals in traditional approach has to be four times longer in order to reach the same accuracy as in proposed here analytical approach.


## 8.2. Calculation of the Rectangular Plate

We consider here some benchmark examples for rectangular plate with different boundary conditions. In the first example plate was loaded by concentrated force applied to the point in its center. In all other examples the plate was loaded by uniformly distributed over the domainΩ load. Boundary conditions and load are presented in the first column of Tables 1–6. For all presented here examples solution obtained by BEM was compared with existing analytical solution, which can be presented in the form of Fourier series [23].Table 1Loading patternNumber of BEPointsBoundary conditionsΔtΔwmaxΔwΔθnΔMnΔVn201—0.947—0.8133.2910.845361—0.987—0.9774.2240.938441—0.994—0.9914.6570.955Table 2Loading patternNumber of BEPointsBoundary conditionsΔtΔwmaxΔwΔθnΔMnΔVn201—0.940—0.8493.8310.950361—0.985—0.9803.9520.983441—0.993—0.9934.1540.988Table 3Loading patternNumber of BEPointsBoundary conditionsΔtΔwmaxΔwΔθnΔMnΔVn201——0.9560.9974.2510.995361——0.9900.9975.4620.996441——0.9950.9995.5640.998Table 4Loading patternNumber of BEPointsBoundary conditionsΔtΔwmaxΔwΔθnΔMnΔVn201—0.935—0.9972.6310.9692——0.9450.968361—0.985—0.9904.5290.9892——0.9870.997441—0.993—0.9924.7610.9922——0.9941.000Table 5Loading patternNumber of BEPointsBoundary conditionsΔtΔwmaxΔwΔθnΔMnΔVn201——0.9450.9673.6710.9702—0.937—0.926361——0.9870.9984.2390.9992—0.985—0.995441——0.9940.9994.2810.9962—0.993—0.993Table 6Loading patternNumber of BEPointsBoundary conditionsΔtΔwmaxΔwΔθnΔMnΔVn2010.9470.995——4.1710.9362—0.937—0.8173610.9800.998——4.2190.9762—0.984—0.9734410.9930.999——4.4610.9832—0.992—0.995Columns 4–7 of Tables1–6 show Δw,Δθn,Δmn,Δvn—the ratio of the unknown boundary conditions for different values of N to the values obtained analytically at points 1 and 2 for the schemes presented in the column 1. This data can be used to optimize the number of the BE depending on the required accuracy for different boundary conditions. According to our estimates, the value N=40 can be recommended in calculations performed for different combinations of boundary conditions and loading schemes. Here, the error in the calculation of the unknown boundary conditions does not exceed 1%. Column 9 of Tables 1–6 shows values of Δwmax—ratio of the maximum deflection calculated by the BEM to the corresponding values obtained analytically [23]. With number of the BE equal to N=40, the error is no greater than 1.7% for any variant of boundary conditions and loading presented in Tables 1–6 except the first one. It is equal to 4.5% for the first case, which can be attributed to the inaccuracy of approximation of the concentrated force.Integrals in (44) have been calculated numerically using the Gaussian quadratures (48) and analytically using presented here equations (52). An important fact testifying to the expediency of use of the presented here equations for analytical integration (52) for calculation of the coefficients of system (47) is the reduction of the computational time. Column 8 of the Tables 1–6 shows values of Δt—the ratio of the time required to construct the system of the linear algebraic equations (47) analytically using (52) and numerically using the Gaussian quadratures. Studies have shown that use of the approach proposed here makes it possible to cut the time required to obtain solution the problem by the factor from 2.5 to 5. This is particularly important when the calculations have to be performed repeatedly, such as in the solution of the dynamic and nonlinear problems. The amount of time saved depends mainly on the number of the BE approximating the boundary, as well as on the type of boundary conditions.In order to visualize results from Tables1–6 also Figures 9–14 are presented. They complement data from the corresponding tables and present them in more convenient and visual form.Figure 9
Dependence of the boundary data and time of calculations on number of the BE.Figure 10
Dependence of the boundary data and time of calculations on number of the BE.Figure 11
Dependence of the boundary data and time of calculations on number of the BE.Figure 12
Dependence of the boundary data and time of calculations on number of the BE.Figure 13
Dependence of the boundary data and time of calculations on number of the BE.Figure 14
Dependence of the boundary data and time of calculations on number of the BE.


## 8.3. Calculation of the T-Shaped Plate

The diagram of the T-shaped plate together with boundary conditions is presented in Figure15. The plate is subjected to action of the uniformly distributed over the domain Ω load of the magnitude q. Material properties of the plate have been calculated from the equation (qa4)/(Eh4)=100 and Poisson ratio υ=0.3.Figure 15
T-shaped plate.In Figure16 are presented distributions of the values σxa2/4Eh2 and w/h for the cross-section with coordinate x2=0 and for number of the BesN=96. The solid line corresponds to the BEM and dash line to FEM solutions, respectively.Figure 16From this data follows that results obtained by the BEM and by the FEM are in a good agreement but time of calculation by the BEM is significantly less.


## 9. Conclusion

Direct BIEM based on Betty’s theorem is applied here for solution of thin elastic plate bending problems for different boundary conditions and load. Analytical integration of the regular and divergent integrals over the BE is applied, and effective formulas for calculation of coefficients of the system of linear algebraic equations for the BEM have been developed. The main advantage of the proposed approach consists in significant reduction of the calculation time comparison with traditional approach based on Gaussian’s quadratures. Numerical examples demonstrate effectiveness of the proposed here approach. In all presented examples it was demonstrated high accuracy, in good agreement with existing analytical solutions and significant reduction of the time of calculations in comparison with traditional approaches.



---

*Source: 295904-2011-07-15.xml*