# A Miniaturized Meandered Dipole UHF RFID Tag Antenna for Flexible Application

Authors: Xiuwei Xuan; Lianrong Lv; Kun Li
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

A miniaturized meandered dipole antenna for UHF RFID tag is proposed. Different resonance frequencies and impedance can be achieved by adjusting the number of the meanders, which can help to reduce the size of the antenna. Due to the radiation patches, the input impedance of the antenna can be flexibly tuned in a large scale. The proposed antenna is printed on polyethylene (PET) substrate with a total volume of 48 mm × 13.7 mm × 0.5 mm. Modeling and simulation results show that the reflection coefficient of the antenna is less than −15 dB at 860–960 MHz. Experimental studies demonstrate that the minimum threshold power of the antenna is between 23 and 26 dBm and the measured read range is 3-4 m.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is a noncontact automatic identification and data acquisition technology that uses radio waves. With the excellent features, such as no line-of-sight requirement, long operating range, and working under harsh environment, RFID is widely used in various information systems. Ultrahigh frequency (UHF) RFID has many advantages compared to low-frequency system, such as longer read range and faster data rate and programmability. UHF RFID technology has become popular in everyday life. A typical RFID tag consists of an antenna and an integrated circuit chip. UHF RFID system involves electromagnetic interaction between the antenna of tag and reader. Backscattering modulation will have good performance when the microchip matches its internal load to the antenna [1, 2]. The tag’s antenna plays a key role in the system performance, such as read range, the power consumption of the microchip, and the overall size of the tag [3]. Since most UHF RFID tags are attached onto size-constrained objects, it is necessary to design small-geometry antennas with good radiation efficiency. To reduce the size of antenna, there are two strategies: meandering and inverted-F structures.In order to reduce the size of the planar inverted-F antenna (PIFA), Zhang and Long embedded a slotted via-patch in the middle layer, which made the antenna input impedance flexibly tuned in a large scale [4]. However, the dual-layer antenna is complex for large scale production.As proposed in [3], to operate on a plurality of materials for ubiquitous applications, antenna with sufficient bandwidth is necessary. The designed antenna can be mounted on a wide variety of dielectric materials of arbitrary thickness. As the permittivity increased, the resonance frequency decreased and the reflection coefficient increased, due to the amplitude-scaling factor. Microstrip antenna often reduces the antenna size by using dielectric slab with a high permittivity or increases communication frequency [5]. However, due to the limited bandwidth and large structure, microstrip antennas are not suitable for some applications. Hence, it is desirable to design small low cost, low profile antenna for simple production process [6]. According to Marrocco [2], the layout of the T-match has a considerable effect on the impedance of antenna. We adopt a T-match network to get a broadband performance.This paper concentrates on the design of an electrically small flexible tag antenna with high efficiency, simple structure, and low cost. By changing the structure of dipole, we can adjust the input impedance of the antenna, so it can match its impedance to the microchip.


## 2. Antenna Configuration

In this section, we present a miniaturized UHF RFID tag antenna with a similar structure to that of 9662, manufactured by Alien Technology. The structural configuration of the antenna is illustrated in Figure1. The antenna consists of a loop for feeding, a meandered dipole, and two radiators. The coupling between the loop and the dipole is adjusted by the distance between them and the size of loop [7].Figure 1
Structural configuration of the proposed antenna.The input impedance of the antenna in Figure1, Za, is given by(1)Za=Ra+jXa=Zloop+2πfM2Zmd+Zrad,where Zloop, Zmd, and Zrad are the individual impedance of the loop, meandered dipole, and radiator, respectively. M is the mutual inductance between the loop and meandered dipole.We can see the tag as a one-port network, shown in Figure2, which represents an antenna-chip circuit with complex source and load impedance. The power reflection coefficient between the antenna and chip S112 shows what fraction of the maximum power available from the generator is not delivered to the load:(2)S112=Zc-Za∗Zc+Za2,0≤S112≤1,where Zc=Rc+jXc is the chip impedance and Za=Ra+jXa is antenna impedance. Za∗ is the conjugate of Za.Figure 2
The equivalent circuit with two complex impedance instances.The power transmission coefficientτ is given by [8](3)τ=1-S112=1-Zc-Za∗Zc+Za2=4RcRaZc+Za2≤1.The activation distance of the tagr can be calculated using Friis free-space formula as [8](4)r=λ4πPtGtGrτPth,where λ is the wavelength, Pt is the power transmitted by the reader, Gt is the gain of the transmitting antenna, Gr is the gain of the receiving tag antenna, and Pth is the minimum threshold power to activate the RFID tag chip.The impedance matching between the antenna and the chip is the primary factor that affects the performance of the antenna. To match the input impedance to the complex impedance value of Higgs-3, a meandered dipole and inductively coupled feed are utilized. The antenna is printed on PET substrate with a thickness of 0.5 mm, a relative permittivity of 2.25, and a dielectric loss tangent of 0.001. The antenna is designed to conjugately match the passive IC chip of Alien Higgs-3 at around 920 MHz. We choose etched aluminum to manufacture the antenna.


### 2.1. Antenna with Different Number of Meanders

In order to validate the design procedure, antennas with different number of meanders are modeled and simulated using full-wave simulator Ansoft HFSS.n represents the number of the meanders. Figure 3 illustrates the antenna input impedance and reflection coefficients when n=2,3,4, respectively.Figure 3
Simulated input impedance and reflection coefficients of tag antenna with different meanders.
(a)
The number of meandersn is 2, 3, and 4, respectively
(b)
Input impedance
(c)
Reflection coefficientsIn Figure3(a), the three antennas have the same total size with different number of meanders. Figure 3(b) shows the impedance characteristic of the three antennas. We can discover that the number of meanders could effectively tune the input impedance of the antenna. Figure 3(c) indicates the corresponding reflection coefficient of S11. It can be seen that the −3 dB bandwidth stretches across 860–960 MHz, which covers the entire UHF RFID band. As the number of meanders increases, the distances between them become closer and cause more offset coupling. According to Expression (1), the impedance of the meandered dipole Zmd decreases. That is to say, by independently adjusting n, the conjugate impedance matching different microchips can be easily realized.


### 2.2. Antenna with Different Radiators

Figure4 illustrates the input impedance and reflection coefficients of antennas with different radiators when n=3. The first antenna does not have a radiator. The second antenna has a radiator with width W1=2.6mm, while the third antenna has a radiator with width W1=5.2mm. Since a larger radiator has greater impedance, we can easily control the antenna impedance and S11 by changing the width of the radiator, which can be proved by Figures 4(b) and 4(c). Noting that impedance increases with W1, we can get conjugate impedance matching different microchips by adjusting W1. Similarly, different resonant frequencies and −3 dB bandwidth can also be realized with different W1.Figure 4
Simulated input impedance and reflection coefficients of tag antenna with different radiators.
(a)
The width of radiatorsW1 is 0 mm, 2.6 mm, and 5.2 mm, respectively
(b)
Input impedance
(c)
Reflection coefficients


### 2.3. Antenna with Different Size of Loops

Figure5 illustrates the input impedance and reflection coefficients of antennas with different size of loop when n=3. The first antenna has a loop with L1=4.35mm and H=3.4mm. The second antenna has a loop with L1=4.35mm and H=7.4mm, while the size of the loop in the third antenna is L1=9.15mm, with H=7.4mm. Figure 5(b) presents that the imaginary part of the antenna impedance is largely determined by the size of the loop. By comparing S11 characteristics of the three antennas in Figure 5(c), we can discover the power reflection coefficient decrease when the size of loop increases. According to Expression (1), loop with larger size has higher impedance Zloop. Meanwhile, the mutual inductance between the loop and meandered dipole will also increase. Therefore, the conjugate impedance matching different microchips can be easily realized by adjusting the size of loop.Figure 5
Simulated input impedance and reflection coefficients of tag antenna with different loops.
(a)
Antennas with different size of loops
(b)
Input impedance
(c)
Reflection coefficients


## 2.1. Antenna with Different Number of Meanders

In order to validate the design procedure, antennas with different number of meanders are modeled and simulated using full-wave simulator Ansoft HFSS.n represents the number of the meanders. Figure 3 illustrates the antenna input impedance and reflection coefficients when n=2,3,4, respectively.Figure 3
Simulated input impedance and reflection coefficients of tag antenna with different meanders.
(a)
The number of meandersn is 2, 3, and 4, respectively
(b)
Input impedance
(c)
Reflection coefficientsIn Figure3(a), the three antennas have the same total size with different number of meanders. Figure 3(b) shows the impedance characteristic of the three antennas. We can discover that the number of meanders could effectively tune the input impedance of the antenna. Figure 3(c) indicates the corresponding reflection coefficient of S11. It can be seen that the −3 dB bandwidth stretches across 860–960 MHz, which covers the entire UHF RFID band. As the number of meanders increases, the distances between them become closer and cause more offset coupling. According to Expression (1), the impedance of the meandered dipole Zmd decreases. That is to say, by independently adjusting n, the conjugate impedance matching different microchips can be easily realized.


## 2.2. Antenna with Different Radiators

Figure4 illustrates the input impedance and reflection coefficients of antennas with different radiators when n=3. The first antenna does not have a radiator. The second antenna has a radiator with width W1=2.6mm, while the third antenna has a radiator with width W1=5.2mm. Since a larger radiator has greater impedance, we can easily control the antenna impedance and S11 by changing the width of the radiator, which can be proved by Figures 4(b) and 4(c). Noting that impedance increases with W1, we can get conjugate impedance matching different microchips by adjusting W1. Similarly, different resonant frequencies and −3 dB bandwidth can also be realized with different W1.Figure 4
Simulated input impedance and reflection coefficients of tag antenna with different radiators.
(a)
The width of radiatorsW1 is 0 mm, 2.6 mm, and 5.2 mm, respectively
(b)
Input impedance
(c)
Reflection coefficients


## 2.3. Antenna with Different Size of Loops

Figure5 illustrates the input impedance and reflection coefficients of antennas with different size of loop when n=3. The first antenna has a loop with L1=4.35mm and H=3.4mm. The second antenna has a loop with L1=4.35mm and H=7.4mm, while the size of the loop in the third antenna is L1=9.15mm, with H=7.4mm. Figure 5(b) presents that the imaginary part of the antenna impedance is largely determined by the size of the loop. By comparing S11 characteristics of the three antennas in Figure 5(c), we can discover the power reflection coefficient decrease when the size of loop increases. According to Expression (1), loop with larger size has higher impedance Zloop. Meanwhile, the mutual inductance between the loop and meandered dipole will also increase. Therefore, the conjugate impedance matching different microchips can be easily realized by adjusting the size of loop.Figure 5
Simulated input impedance and reflection coefficients of tag antenna with different loops.
(a)
Antennas with different size of loops
(b)
Input impedance
(c)
Reflection coefficients


## 3. Antenna Design and Characteristics

In this design, we fix the number of meandersn at 3 and the width of the radiator W1 at 5.2 mm. The prototype antenna is designed for Alien Higgs-3 RFID chip, whose input impedance is Z=19-j119Ω at 925 MHz. A photograph of the fabricated tag is shown in Figure 6. The relevant parameters of the antenna are as follows: L=48mm, W=13.7mm, W1=6.2mm, W2=1.2mm, W3=2.5mm, W4=6mm, L1=9.15 mm, H1=11.2 mm, H2=9.7 mm, and W5=1.5 mm. The overall size of our miniaturized tag is 48 mm × 13.7 mm × 0.5 mm, while the size of 9662 is 69 mm × 16 mm × 0.5 mm.Figure 6
Photograph of the proposed RFID tag and 9662.In order to verify the matching performance, the impedance measurement was carried out using vector network analyzer (VNA) and the port-extension technique proposed in [9]. The configuration of the measurement system is illustrated in Figure 7.Figure 7
Measurement setup using VNA.Figure8 shows the impedance characteristic and the reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna. In Figure 8(a), solid line represents the reactance while dashed line represents the resistance, and chip represents the conjugate value of tag chip’s impedance.Figure 8
Impedance matching performance of the proposed antenna.
(a)
Input impedance
(b)
Reflection coefficients ofS11The minimum threshold power as well as read range of the tag was measured in an anechoic chamber using a circularly polarized reader antenna with an effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) of 4 W. From Figure9, we can discover that the minimum threshold power is between 23 and 26 dBm over the entire UHF RFID band. Figure 10 shows that the measured read range of the proposed tag is between 3 and 4 m. That is to say, the reading performance of the tag is stable over the entire UHF RFID band.Figure 9
The minimum threshold power to activate the tag chip.Figure 10
Measured read range of the proposed tag antenna.


## 4. Conclusion

A miniaturized and flexible RFID tag antenna with a total volume of 48 mm × 13.7 mm × 0.5 mm is proposed for the UHF RFID band. Different radiation patches and number of meanders can be employed to help get diverse input impedance and small size characteristics. The simulation study of the antenna has been carried out with the help of HFSS, while the measurement study has been implemented in an anechoic chamber. Both the simulation and measurement results indicate that the impedance matching performance is acceptable, which implies that the proposed antenna is a good candidate for miniaturized, flexible, and low-power consumption tags.



---

*Source: 2951659-2016-05-23.xml*