# Development of a Data-Driven Decision-Making System Using Lean and Smart Manufacturing Concept in Industry 4.0: A Case Study

Authors: Varun Tripathi; Somnath Chattopadhyaya; A. K. Mukhopadhyay; Suvandan Saraswat; Shubham Sharma; Changhe Li; S. Rajkumar
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Nowadays, industries are emphasizing the implementation of a smart shop floor management method because of different types of problems faced in controlling the production activities in Industry 4.0. Several shop floor management methods are currently implemented in the present Industry 4.0 scenario, including lean manufacturing, logistics, Internet of things, smart manufacturing, cyber-physical system, and artificial intelligence. The present research work is focused on the development and Taguchi validation methodology of a data-driven decision-making system usingL9 orthogonal array for smart shop floor management based on the relationship between production sustainability and constraints. The proposed system has been validated by a comprehensive investigation of a case of mining machinery manufacturing unit. The result of the investigation revealed that productivity has been enhanced by effective controlling of production activities on the shop floor. Taguchi L9 orthogonal array method of design of experiments is implemented to enhance flexibility for shop floor control and meanwhile minimize the production time due to inefficient operating conditions on the shop floor. Taguchi method was implemented for critical conditions affecting production lead time and resource utilization. The authors have detailed discussion on developing present novel hybrid integration of lean and smart manufacturing approaches to enhance operational excellence in production activities and other complicated manufacturing environment on the shop floor within available resources. The present finding demonstrates that the adopted digital technologies under smart manufacturing with lean manufacturing are found to be cost-effective approach under different environmental conditions. The proposed system has significantly improved the efficiency of production management and operational performance by using smart systems and has proved effective in improving the financial position by making a safer shop floor management approach. In this article, a robust problem-solving system is provided. The present work aims to introduce revolutionary methods for Industry 4.0 that would result in productivity enhancement and beneficial impact on industry persons by improving the smart shop floor management. The study also provides valuable perspective and sustainable guidelines to facilitate industry individuals to implement lean and smart manufacturing for productivity enhancement in the production environment of Industry 4.0.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Nowadays, the primary demand of Industry 4.0 is to control production within available resources. For this, advanced shop floor management methods are used to control the production in the present scenario [1]. The main objective of shop floor management is to maximize productivity within limited constraints [2, 3]. In Industry 4.0, smart manufacturing, logistics, Internet of things, lean manufacturing, cyber-physical system, and artificial intelligence are used for operation management on the shop floor [4]. These methods are based on different principles, but they have the same objective—how to optimize the production processes efficiently. These methods are used to control the operational excellence of production processes in different working conditions. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) describe methods and objectives of advanced shop floor management in Industry 4.0.Figure 1
(a) Illustration of shop floor management methods in industry 4.0. (b) Illustration of objective of advanced shop floor management in industry 4.0.
(a)(b)The shop floor management concept was originated from Toyota Production System after the crisis in production management in terms of higher production time, higher cost, poor quality, insecure environment, and higher resource utilization [5]. The concept is used to eliminate sources of non-value-added activity (waste) and to plan an efficient work plan for productivity enhancement [6, 7]. With the passage of time, the production system changes and the need for advanced methods started increasing. To accomplish this, traditional methods are changed and modified. The developed methods are implemented to enhance production in Industry 4.0 [8]. The main aim of developed methods is to eliminate waste found in different production conditions on the shop floor [9]. In previous research, several strategies were used to identify waste found in production conditions and to investigate the real shop floor condition and constraints of the relevant production management system. Figure 2 illustrates the strategies implemented in previous research works to identify wastes.Figure 2
Strategies implemented in previous works in recognition of wastes.Previous research shows that production performance depends on several factors like production planning, activities, intelligent system availability, working environment, automation adaptability, sensors, and availability of resources [10]. However, the improvements in productivity from the discussed methodology were poorer than the improvements achieved from a systematic strategy using the advanced shop floor management concept. The advanced shop floor management approach is introduced as a production reformer, and it helps to increase productivity within limited constraints [11]. Constraints are the limits of the management system, and they are found in mainly three forms in industries. Figure 3 describes the constraints faced in the production management system on the shop floor in Industry 4.0.Figure 3
Constraints faced in operation management on the shop floor in industry 4.0.The shop floor management approaches are used to eliminate waste found in production processes in the industry [12]. Previous researchers have been used in various methods to enhance operational performance in production processes by eliminating waste. Table 1 shows what has been done so far in the past in terms of the methodology used in previous research works.Table 1
Description of previous research works according to implemented work methodology.
ReferencesMedium of observationAnalysis of factorsMethodResultRamani and Lingan [13]SurveyProduction activities, workload, work planValue stream mapping (VSM)Productivity improvementShou et al. [14]Questionnaire, interviewProduction activities, production parametersVSMReduction in production timeSaqlain et al. [15]Work planProduction processes, work planInternet of thingsProductivity enhancement and prognosis of production lineGijo et al. [16]SurveyMachinery conditionLean six sigmaReduction of cost and defectsMittal et al. [17]Survey, interviewProduction process, production parameters, work planSmart manufacturingSmart manufacturing able to improve production management systemStadnicka and Litwin, [18]SurveyProduction process, production parameters, work planVSMReduction in production timeAsif and Singh [19]Production activities, work planProduction processes, work planInternet of thingsCost reductionCannas et al. [20]SurveyThe production process, machinery conditionLean manufacturing, KaizenImprovement in production time and work performanceDas et al. [21]SurveyThe production process, work plan, production parameterVSM, Kaizen, single minute exchange of dieReduction in production time, work-in-process inventory, congestion on the shop floor, and improvement in workplace safetyChien and Chen [22]Production activitiesProduction processes, work plan, machinerySmart manufacturingImproved machinery effectiveness, reduced production timeGaspar et al. [23]SurveyProduction processes, work planInternet of thingsProved superior decision-making methodKumar et al. [24]Survey, meetingProduction activities, production parameter, work plan, machinery availabilityLean manufacturing, KaizenReduction in production time, manpower, and machinery setting timeMéndez and Rodriguez [25]Interview, meetingProduction activities, machinery condition, work plan, production parameterTotal productive maintenanceImprovement in productivity and qualityThomas et al. [26]Survey, meetingProduction processes, production parameter, work planLean six sigmaReduction in production time and cost.Lu and Yang [27]SurveyThe production process, work plan, production parameters, workloadLean manufacturing, KaizenReduction in production time and improvement in resource utilizationTorres et al. [28]SurveyProduction process, work planSmart manufacturingSmart manufacturing proved an efficient method for shop floor managementTyagi et al. [29]Survey, interview, meetingProduction process, work plan, production parameterVSMReduction in production timeAndrade et al. [30]SurveyProduction process, production parameter, workloadVSMReduction in production time and improved utilization of work position.Frankό et al. [31]Work planProduction processes on the shop floorInternet of thingsEnhanced efficiency of logistic taskSeth and Gupta [32]SurveyProduction process, work plan, production parameter, workloadVSMImprovement in production and reduction in work-in-process inventoryLiao et al. [33]Production processes, work planProduction activities, machinery condition, work plan,Internet of thingsReduction in cost and improvement in customer satisfaction in terms of productVinodh et al. [34]Survey, questionnaireProduction process, work plan, production parameter, machinery availabilityVSMReduction in production time and defectsBeliatis et al. [35]Work plan, interviewTraceability of the productIndustrial Internet of thingsReduction in bottleneck and lead timeHorak et al. [36]Work planVulnerability of the production lineIndustrial Internet of thingsCyber-attack responsible of malfunction of Internet of things devices and failure of production lineResearchers have been appreciated smart manufacturing, lean manufacturing, and the Internet of things to production enhancement in Industry 4.0. Other shop floor management methods like Kaizen and lean six sigma have been used by some researchers. Because these methods can be applied only in specific production situations with many limitations. These methods use traditional strategies which are not beneficial in Industry 4.0. To increase the effectiveness of all these methods, they were integrated with advanced shop floor management methods and called the hybrid approach. The hybrid approach has been implemented in previous research, which mainly includes lean smart manufacturing, lean Kaizen, and smart Kaizen. The authors of the present research are studying the methodologies developed in previous research works to clarify the message. The research gap and conclusion identified by previous research work are as follows:(i)
All the studies that have developed the system for shop floor management applications in the production environment concluded that improving the work plan can reduce production parameters but concluded that this is not a generalized strategy that can apply in all types of the Industry 4.0 production environment.(ii)
There is no clarity in previous research on how to enhance production in Industry 4.0 by identification of waste. Therefore, the shortcomings of the previous studies reported in the literature were mainly the lack of control systems implemented for smart shop floor mapping in factories.However, only a few studies in the open literature studied the methodology development to control shop floor management for enhancement in productivity in Industry 4.0. Nevertheless, several methodologies have been developed to improve the production process using shop floor management methods. This study analyses advanced shop floor management methods implementation in Industry 4.0 by a developed methodology. The following questions are raised as part of the research work objective:(i)
How to demonstrate the problem-solving key of shop floor management in Industry 4.0 through an efficient method using a methodology for reducing nonproductive activities (waste) influencing productivity level.(ii)
How to identify wastes in the production environment by applying the proposed methodology. Here, the production environment refers to higher productivity levels within limited constraints.The present research work is focused on the development of a novel methodology using lean and smart manufacturing for control of uncertain production management system based on the relationship between shop floor management and resource availability.


## 2. Research Methodology

The development of a methodology is a systematic strategy to implement shop floor management methods that the regulation of production can be possible. In previous studies, researchers developed a system to improve the effectiveness of shop floor management methods for enhancement in productivity. In the proposed methodology, emphasis was laid on improving the control of resource utilization according to the shop floor management system in Industry 4.0. The following features distinguish the proposed methodology and prove essential for implementing the shop floor management method:(i)
The proposed system helps in identifying the reason for waste and source of waste and investigates the impact of the shop floor management method on the production environment in Industry 4.0.(ii)
The proposed data-driven decision-making system provides a systemic illustration of the shop floor, and it helps the management system to control production process and activities in smart factory.(iii)
The developed system enhances production within limited constraints, through advanced shop floor management methods including smart manufacturing, Internet of things, and cyber-physical system.(iv)
The proposed system can be implemented in Industry 4.0 and obtain industrial sustainability using smart sensor-based system.The data-driven decision-making system has been developed to improve and regulate the production processes within limited constraints. Figure4 describes the proposed system for shop floor management in Industry 4.0.Figure 4
Proposed data-driven system for shop floor management in industry 4.0.


## 3. Developed Data-Driven Decision-Making System for Shop Floor Management

The main objective of the data-driven decision-making system is to control uncertain production activities within limited constraints, and it has been possible by the elimination of waste found in production processes on the shop floor. The developed system is an effort to improve the manageability of the shop floor management system to enhance productivity within limited constraints in Industry 4.0.


### 3.1. Product Information

This case example deals with the improvement in production on a semiautomated assembly line in a leading earthmoving machinery manufacturing unit. This assembly line was dedicated to producing a skid-steer loader. Skid-steer loader is earthmoving machinery and is based on cutting-edge technology. The skid-steer loader is a marvel in the mining machinery industry, complete with maneuverability, compactness, and versatility. The present industry is unable to meet the needs of the customers within the available constraints and is facing continuous customer complaints regarding the quality of the product. This results in dissatisfaction in customers and looking to go to other manufacturers who can provide better mining equipment within the specified time. The actual information of production condition has been collected by Gemba Walk, discussion with workers in meeting, previous records, and direct observation. Table2 describes previous production records of the shop floor management system.Table 2
Observed production condition on the shop floor.
Production conditionQuantityWorking time570 minutesBreak time50 minutesAvailable time520 minutesProduction timeJob shop productionNumber of shops10Number of product/days6Number of processes18Number of employees52Number of workers44Number of shifts1Shop floor area34.5 meter × 76 meterMaterial handling equipmentHoist, forkliftCustomer requirementTime, service, quality, costConstraintsManpower, shop floor area, material handling tool, present shop floor working environment, machinery, budgetProduction problemsHigher distance between workstations, breakdown of material handling equipment, lack of production planning, congestion on the shop floor, improper clampingProcess for higher production timeOutsourcing services like painting


### 3.2. Analysis of Shop Floor Management

Lean and smart manufacturing was adopted to investigate the efficiency of the present production management system. A sample case of the earthmoving equipment assembly unit was selected as an example. The production shop floor data have been summarized by an analysis of production factors. A flow chart was developed to understand the actual activities performed on the shop floor. Figure5 shows production processes performed on the shop floor. The waste related to the production process was identified from the activities being carried out at workstations and by analyzing the production parameters derived from them; the actual state of production was evaluated as was in the proposed methodology. Table 3 describes resources available at the workstation of the present case and it has been analyzed by observation and discussion with workers.Figure 5
Observed production plan on shop floor.Table 3
Resource availability on the present production shop floor.
WorkstationShop floor management methodResourcesManpowerShop floor area (square meter)Machinery conditionMachinery positionMaterial handling equipmentTransmission assemblyLean manufacturing472.5OkUnplannedManualEngine assemblyLean six sigma218.7PoorPlannedManualWheel assemblySmart manufacturing216.36OkPlannedManualHydraulic pump assemblyLean manufacturing212.53OkUnplannedManualHydraulic motor assemblyLean manufacturing212.53OkUnplannedManualManufacturing of loader armLean manufacturing371.23OkPlannedHoistChassis manufacturingLean manufacturing545.99PoorUnplannedManualChassis and loader arm fabricationLean six sigma356.125InsufficientUnplannedForkliftComplex part manufacturingSmart manufacturing1113.94OkPlannedHoistPainting (baby part)Lean manufacturing289.02OkPlannedHoistPainting (loader and chassis)Lean six sigmaOutsourcing72.5Not availableNot availableForkliftHandover of equipment to the inspection teamLean manufacturing272.5Not requiredNot requiredManualInspection at running conditionLean manufacturing4837.47Not requiredNot requiredNot requiredTesting of tools workability on fieldLean manufacturing472.5OkPlannedManualCabin installmentSmart manufacturing2110.800MalfunctioningPlannedHoistElectric gauge assemblyLean manufacturing289.04OkPlannedManualQuality inspectionLean six sigma2135.66OkUnplannedNot requiredServicingLean manufacturing2Not requiredOkUnplannedManualThe problems faced by the management system in the present case have been identified by the analysis of resources and actual performance of production processes on the shop floor. To do this, production condition is evaluated by calculating the production parameters and identifying the problems faced on workstations. The production parameters such as lead time (LT), idle time (IT), available time (AT), uptime (UT), cycle time (CT), change over time (CO), value-added time (VAT), and non-value-added time (NVAT) of production processes have been calculated and shown in Table4. The problems faced on present production shop floor management system have been described in Table 5.Table 4
Analysis of present production processes on the shop floor.
S.No.ProcessAT (minute)UT (%)No. of operatorsCO (minute)CT (minute)NVAT (minute)IT (minutes)1Transmission assembly52082.69890360105152Manufacturing of loader arm52087.5036524595303Chassis manufacturing52085.58475265140654Wheel assembly52097.1231515025105Chassis and loader arm fabrication52079.813105300150456Inspection of fabrication52097.123156045307Painting (baby parts)52095.1922531555308Painting (large parts)52090.38150300149014409Engine assembly52093.27235190501510Hydraulic pump and motor assembly52095.19225120452011Roll off and hot testing52089.42655237016511012Cabin installment52096.15220185604013Electric gauges assembly52095.19325195704514Final inspection52098.082101603525Table 5
The problems faced by the management system in production processes.
S.No.Name of shopProblemsSource of problem1.Transmission1. Long-distance between workstations(i) Lack of workload allotment2. Unplanned location of machinery(ii) Ergonomics issues3. Lack of material handling equipment(iii) Absence of condition monitoring system4. Lack of safety on the shop floor(iv) Lack of production planning5. Improper workload2.Fabrication1. Workplaces are not decided(i) Inefficient production workflow2. More workstations(ii) Lack of layout3. Lack of fabrication plan4. Lack of fabrication equipment3.Profile cutting1. Mostly shutdown.(i) Absence of smart control system2. Higher setup time(ii) Lack of awareness3. Rarely required4. Lack of skilled workers4.Engine assembly1. A longer distance between workstations(i) Safety issues2. Higher material handling time(ii) Manual power control system3. Lack of workers(iii) Lack of work allotment plan4. Poor arrangement for material handling5.Painting1. Painting of larger parts has been done in another plant(i) Outsourcing of services2. Required extra worker for inspection of larger part painting(ii) Logistics issues3. Fewer number of workers in the painting shop(iii) Traditional safety equipment4. Ergonomics issues(iv) Congestion at the workstation6.Hot testing1. No timeline set for the workstation(i) Lack of work plan2. Due to the lack of shop floor area at the next workstation, the movement time of the product is not determined(ii) Parking in open space due to shortage of area on the shop floor7.Cabin installmentLack of worker’s experience(i) Lack of training and meetingsMalfunctioning in machinery(ii) Manual control system8.Electric gauge assembly1. Lower worker skills(i) Worker’s involvement in more than one shop2. Higher workload(ii) Lack of workload plan9.Quality inspection1. Non-detection of faults(i) Manual inspection2. Unnecessary change of workers(ii) Lack of workload plan


### 3.3. Development of New Production Shop Floor

Planning and execution of new production shop floor include four steps according to the working environment: elimination of non-value-added activities, optimization of production processes, proposal of action plan for the elimination of waste, and illustration of production planning a flow chart. The steps refer to improvement in overall production processes on the shop floor. This type of step involves all the optimization of production processes, identification of non-value-added activities, resources, and work plan. The proposed data-driven decision-making system aims to provide a guideline to industry persons for improving production on the shop floor using lean and smart manufacturing. The steps involved in the proposed methodology are shown in Figure6.Figure 6
Modified production plan.The next step is to develop a workflow chart by optimization of production processes by a suitable method, and the new workflow chart will help the production manager clearly understand the production processes and propose an action plan for the elimination of waste. With all the details of production shop floor management, a workflow sheet has been prepared and presented in Figure7.Figure 7
Modified new production management system.Table6 shows the proposal of the action plan prepared for smart production shop floor management in all activities. After the review of the production management system, it has been decided that which workstation and production process needed to improve. The review process was done by production workflow analysis session and evaluation of production parameters. The calculation of each parameter used in production shop floor management has been discussed in Table 7.Table 6
Proposed action for production planning.
S. No.Name of shopProposed actionNon-value-added activitySuggested smart production management systemProcess optimization1.Transmission(i) Reduced distance between workstationsTransportation, inventory, motion, non-utilized talentAutomated production lineYes(ii) Machinery placed at the planned location(iii) Provide material handling equipment(iv) Followed up safety norms on the shop floor(v) The workload has been decided according to the skill of the workers2.Fabrication(i) Decided workload according to the skill of the workersNon-utilized talent, motion, waiting, defectEmbedded systemYes(ii) Reduced number of workstations(iii) Developed fabrication planning(iv) Arranged fabrication equipment in a systematic manner3.Profile cutting(i) Organized training for operatorsNon-utilized talent, motionEmbedded systemNA(ii) Eliminate unnecessary activities4.Engine assembly(i) Improvement in layoutTransportation, inventory, motion, non-utilized talent, excess processingAutomated production lineYes(ii) Reduced distance between workstations(iii) Increased number of workers(iv) Arranged material handling equipment in a proper manner5.Painting(i) Increased number of workersMotion, waiting, overproductionEmbedded systemYes(ii) Provided safety equipment for workers(iii) Both the processes were started simultaneously6.Hot testing(i) Decided timeline on the workstationMotionEmbedded system, asset tracking systemYes(ii) Increased shop floor area in layout7.Cabin installment(i) Organized meetings and trainingExcess processing, motionAutomated production line, embedded systemYes8.Electric gauge assembly(i) Replaced operator by skilled operatorExcess processing, non-utilized talent, inventoryEmbedded systemYes(ii) Decided workload distribution9.Quality inspection(i) Improve production planningMotion, excess processingAutomated production lineYes(ii) Eliminate unnecessary activitiesTable 7
Improvement in production parameter in product.
S. No.ProcessAT (minute)UT{UT = (AT − CO)/AT)} (%)Number of workersCO (minute)CT (minute)NVAT (minutes)Idle time (minutes)1Transmission assembly52085.5877534085102Manufacturing of loader arm52088.4646024580203Chassis manufacturing52086.54570250130604Wheel assembly52098.0831013520105Chassis and loader arm fabrication52079.815105320160456Painting52090.38250240147014207Engine assembly52093.2733518050158Hydraulic pump and motor assembly52096.1532012040209Roll off and hot testing52091.3574523101359010Cabin installment and electric gauge assembly52094.23330330754511Final inspection52098.082101503020


## 3.1. Product Information

This case example deals with the improvement in production on a semiautomated assembly line in a leading earthmoving machinery manufacturing unit. This assembly line was dedicated to producing a skid-steer loader. Skid-steer loader is earthmoving machinery and is based on cutting-edge technology. The skid-steer loader is a marvel in the mining machinery industry, complete with maneuverability, compactness, and versatility. The present industry is unable to meet the needs of the customers within the available constraints and is facing continuous customer complaints regarding the quality of the product. This results in dissatisfaction in customers and looking to go to other manufacturers who can provide better mining equipment within the specified time. The actual information of production condition has been collected by Gemba Walk, discussion with workers in meeting, previous records, and direct observation. Table2 describes previous production records of the shop floor management system.Table 2
Observed production condition on the shop floor.
Production conditionQuantityWorking time570 minutesBreak time50 minutesAvailable time520 minutesProduction timeJob shop productionNumber of shops10Number of product/days6Number of processes18Number of employees52Number of workers44Number of shifts1Shop floor area34.5 meter × 76 meterMaterial handling equipmentHoist, forkliftCustomer requirementTime, service, quality, costConstraintsManpower, shop floor area, material handling tool, present shop floor working environment, machinery, budgetProduction problemsHigher distance between workstations, breakdown of material handling equipment, lack of production planning, congestion on the shop floor, improper clampingProcess for higher production timeOutsourcing services like painting


## 3.2. Analysis of Shop Floor Management

Lean and smart manufacturing was adopted to investigate the efficiency of the present production management system. A sample case of the earthmoving equipment assembly unit was selected as an example. The production shop floor data have been summarized by an analysis of production factors. A flow chart was developed to understand the actual activities performed on the shop floor. Figure5 shows production processes performed on the shop floor. The waste related to the production process was identified from the activities being carried out at workstations and by analyzing the production parameters derived from them; the actual state of production was evaluated as was in the proposed methodology. Table 3 describes resources available at the workstation of the present case and it has been analyzed by observation and discussion with workers.Figure 5
Observed production plan on shop floor.Table 3
Resource availability on the present production shop floor.
WorkstationShop floor management methodResourcesManpowerShop floor area (square meter)Machinery conditionMachinery positionMaterial handling equipmentTransmission assemblyLean manufacturing472.5OkUnplannedManualEngine assemblyLean six sigma218.7PoorPlannedManualWheel assemblySmart manufacturing216.36OkPlannedManualHydraulic pump assemblyLean manufacturing212.53OkUnplannedManualHydraulic motor assemblyLean manufacturing212.53OkUnplannedManualManufacturing of loader armLean manufacturing371.23OkPlannedHoistChassis manufacturingLean manufacturing545.99PoorUnplannedManualChassis and loader arm fabricationLean six sigma356.125InsufficientUnplannedForkliftComplex part manufacturingSmart manufacturing1113.94OkPlannedHoistPainting (baby part)Lean manufacturing289.02OkPlannedHoistPainting (loader and chassis)Lean six sigmaOutsourcing72.5Not availableNot availableForkliftHandover of equipment to the inspection teamLean manufacturing272.5Not requiredNot requiredManualInspection at running conditionLean manufacturing4837.47Not requiredNot requiredNot requiredTesting of tools workability on fieldLean manufacturing472.5OkPlannedManualCabin installmentSmart manufacturing2110.800MalfunctioningPlannedHoistElectric gauge assemblyLean manufacturing289.04OkPlannedManualQuality inspectionLean six sigma2135.66OkUnplannedNot requiredServicingLean manufacturing2Not requiredOkUnplannedManualThe problems faced by the management system in the present case have been identified by the analysis of resources and actual performance of production processes on the shop floor. To do this, production condition is evaluated by calculating the production parameters and identifying the problems faced on workstations. The production parameters such as lead time (LT), idle time (IT), available time (AT), uptime (UT), cycle time (CT), change over time (CO), value-added time (VAT), and non-value-added time (NVAT) of production processes have been calculated and shown in Table4. The problems faced on present production shop floor management system have been described in Table 5.Table 4
Analysis of present production processes on the shop floor.
S.No.ProcessAT (minute)UT (%)No. of operatorsCO (minute)CT (minute)NVAT (minute)IT (minutes)1Transmission assembly52082.69890360105152Manufacturing of loader arm52087.5036524595303Chassis manufacturing52085.58475265140654Wheel assembly52097.1231515025105Chassis and loader arm fabrication52079.813105300150456Inspection of fabrication52097.123156045307Painting (baby parts)52095.1922531555308Painting (large parts)52090.38150300149014409Engine assembly52093.27235190501510Hydraulic pump and motor assembly52095.19225120452011Roll off and hot testing52089.42655237016511012Cabin installment52096.15220185604013Electric gauges assembly52095.19325195704514Final inspection52098.082101603525Table 5
The problems faced by the management system in production processes.
S.No.Name of shopProblemsSource of problem1.Transmission1. Long-distance between workstations(i) Lack of workload allotment2. Unplanned location of machinery(ii) Ergonomics issues3. Lack of material handling equipment(iii) Absence of condition monitoring system4. Lack of safety on the shop floor(iv) Lack of production planning5. Improper workload2.Fabrication1. Workplaces are not decided(i) Inefficient production workflow2. More workstations(ii) Lack of layout3. Lack of fabrication plan4. Lack of fabrication equipment3.Profile cutting1. Mostly shutdown.(i) Absence of smart control system2. Higher setup time(ii) Lack of awareness3. Rarely required4. Lack of skilled workers4.Engine assembly1. A longer distance between workstations(i) Safety issues2. Higher material handling time(ii) Manual power control system3. Lack of workers(iii) Lack of work allotment plan4. Poor arrangement for material handling5.Painting1. Painting of larger parts has been done in another plant(i) Outsourcing of services2. Required extra worker for inspection of larger part painting(ii) Logistics issues3. Fewer number of workers in the painting shop(iii) Traditional safety equipment4. Ergonomics issues(iv) Congestion at the workstation6.Hot testing1. No timeline set for the workstation(i) Lack of work plan2. Due to the lack of shop floor area at the next workstation, the movement time of the product is not determined(ii) Parking in open space due to shortage of area on the shop floor7.Cabin installmentLack of worker’s experience(i) Lack of training and meetingsMalfunctioning in machinery(ii) Manual control system8.Electric gauge assembly1. Lower worker skills(i) Worker’s involvement in more than one shop2. Higher workload(ii) Lack of workload plan9.Quality inspection1. Non-detection of faults(i) Manual inspection2. Unnecessary change of workers(ii) Lack of workload plan


## 3.3. Development of New Production Shop Floor

Planning and execution of new production shop floor include four steps according to the working environment: elimination of non-value-added activities, optimization of production processes, proposal of action plan for the elimination of waste, and illustration of production planning a flow chart. The steps refer to improvement in overall production processes on the shop floor. This type of step involves all the optimization of production processes, identification of non-value-added activities, resources, and work plan. The proposed data-driven decision-making system aims to provide a guideline to industry persons for improving production on the shop floor using lean and smart manufacturing. The steps involved in the proposed methodology are shown in Figure6.Figure 6
Modified production plan.The next step is to develop a workflow chart by optimization of production processes by a suitable method, and the new workflow chart will help the production manager clearly understand the production processes and propose an action plan for the elimination of waste. With all the details of production shop floor management, a workflow sheet has been prepared and presented in Figure7.Figure 7
Modified new production management system.Table6 shows the proposal of the action plan prepared for smart production shop floor management in all activities. After the review of the production management system, it has been decided that which workstation and production process needed to improve. The review process was done by production workflow analysis session and evaluation of production parameters. The calculation of each parameter used in production shop floor management has been discussed in Table 7.Table 6
Proposed action for production planning.
S. No.Name of shopProposed actionNon-value-added activitySuggested smart production management systemProcess optimization1.Transmission(i) Reduced distance between workstationsTransportation, inventory, motion, non-utilized talentAutomated production lineYes(ii) Machinery placed at the planned location(iii) Provide material handling equipment(iv) Followed up safety norms on the shop floor(v) The workload has been decided according to the skill of the workers2.Fabrication(i) Decided workload according to the skill of the workersNon-utilized talent, motion, waiting, defectEmbedded systemYes(ii) Reduced number of workstations(iii) Developed fabrication planning(iv) Arranged fabrication equipment in a systematic manner3.Profile cutting(i) Organized training for operatorsNon-utilized talent, motionEmbedded systemNA(ii) Eliminate unnecessary activities4.Engine assembly(i) Improvement in layoutTransportation, inventory, motion, non-utilized talent, excess processingAutomated production lineYes(ii) Reduced distance between workstations(iii) Increased number of workers(iv) Arranged material handling equipment in a proper manner5.Painting(i) Increased number of workersMotion, waiting, overproductionEmbedded systemYes(ii) Provided safety equipment for workers(iii) Both the processes were started simultaneously6.Hot testing(i) Decided timeline on the workstationMotionEmbedded system, asset tracking systemYes(ii) Increased shop floor area in layout7.Cabin installment(i) Organized meetings and trainingExcess processing, motionAutomated production line, embedded systemYes8.Electric gauge assembly(i) Replaced operator by skilled operatorExcess processing, non-utilized talent, inventoryEmbedded systemYes(ii) Decided workload distribution9.Quality inspection(i) Improve production planningMotion, excess processingAutomated production lineYes(ii) Eliminate unnecessary activitiesTable 7
Improvement in production parameter in product.
S. No.ProcessAT (minute)UT{UT = (AT − CO)/AT)} (%)Number of workersCO (minute)CT (minute)NVAT (minutes)Idle time (minutes)1Transmission assembly52085.5877534085102Manufacturing of loader arm52088.4646024580203Chassis manufacturing52086.54570250130604Wheel assembly52098.0831013520105Chassis and loader arm fabrication52079.815105320160456Painting52090.38250240147014207Engine assembly52093.2733518050158Hydraulic pump and motor assembly52096.1532012040209Roll off and hot testing52091.3574523101359010Cabin installment and electric gauge assembly52094.23330330754511Final inspection52098.082101503020


## 4. Results and Discussion

### 4.1. Development of the Current System in Order to Enhance the Operational Performance by Using Hybrid Integrated Lean and Smart Manufacturing Methodology

In line with the research, the objective raised the result demonstrated non-value-added activities and production time reduction and provided benefits in production improvement within limited constraints through the proposed methodology using the shop floor management method for the mining machinery assembly unit in Industry 4.0. In this production management application study, production time reduction was successfully achieved by reducing the waste by facing the challenges of complex environments of the production shop floor. Authors used a new methodology on production shop floor conditions, logically followed only production workflow which does not get into the concept of production management methods, like production parameters, production factors within limited contraints which have been promoted by the previous researchers. The study reports overall production time reduction within available constraints on the production shop floor. To know actual improvement achieved by proposed methodology implementation, an analysis has done between previous condition and improved condition of the production shop floor. The analysis of production enhancement has been shown in Table8.Table 8
Analysis of improvement in terms of production parameter and utilization of resource.
Name of shopProduction parametersUtilization of resourceCT (minutes)CO (minutes)IT (minutes)NVAT (minutes)UT (%)No. of workerMachineryShop floor area (square meter)Assembly45255303.972Yes224.9Fabrication3059510519012.562Yes0Painting3752550204.350NA89.1Roll off and hot testing601020301.761NA837.5Installment501540552.712Yes110.8Inspection1005503Yes0The similar results have been found out by Dehghani et al. [37], who proposed a new game-based optimization algorithm named dart game optimizer. The quality and ability of the performance of dart game optimizer was checked by twenty-three objective functions and was compared with other eight optimization algorithms, including particle swarm optimization, genetic algorithm, gravitational search algorithm, grey wolf optimizer, teaching learning-based algorithm, grasshopper optimization algorithm, marine predators algorithm, and whale optimization algorithm. The result of the study showed that the developed algorithm was efficient and able to exploit and explore in solving different optimization problems. Dehghani et al. [38] developed a new optimizer named multileader optimizer to solve optimization problems. The designed optimizer was used to conduct the algorithm toward a quasi-optimal solution by using information from population members. The result of the study showed that the developed algorithm was superior in solving optimization problems. Dehghani et al. [39] developed a binary model of orientation search algorithm named binary orientation search algorithm. The twenty-three benchmark test functions tested the developed model. The result of the study showed that the developed model was able to solve optimization problems efficiently.Dehghani et al. [40] developed a spring search algorithm to solve single-objective constraints optimization problems. The functionality of the developed algorithm was evaluated by thirty-eight established test mark functions and compared with other eight optimization algorithms, including a teaching learning-based algorithm, genetic algorithm, gravitational search algorithm, grasshopper optimization algorithm, particle swarm optimization, a spotted hyena optimizer, a grey wolf optimizer, and emperor penguin optimizer. The result of the study showed that the developed algorithm has superior exploitation and exploration capabilities compared to other algorithms.The proposed methodology has been efficiently implemented in the present case example of Industry 4.0, in which systematic work planning has been helpful for the reduction in congestion on the shop floor and results in productivity enhancement. Productivity improvement on the shop floor in terms of production parameters has been shown in Figure8.Figure 8
Analysis on parameter between present and proposed shop floor (P1-observed shop floor condition, P2-modified shop floor condition).The similar results have been reported by Dhiman and Kumar [41], who developed a metaheuristic algorithm called spotted hyena optimizer. The developed algorithm was implemented to one unconstrained engineering design problem and five real-life constraints and compared with eight algorithms on twenty-nine benchmark test functions. The result of the study demonstrated that the developed algorithm was better than other metaheuristic algorithms. Dhiman and Kaur [42] developed a bio-inspired algorithm named sooty tern optimization algorithm for constrained industrial problems. The developed algorithm was implemented to solve six constrained industrial applications and compared with nine algorithms over forty-four benchmark functions. The result of the study revealed that the developed model was able to solve constrained problems and was efficient in comparison to other algorithms. Kaur et al. [43] proposed a bio-inspired algorithm named tunicate swarm algorithm. The performance of the tunicate swarm algorithm was evaluated on seventy-four benchmark test problems by ANOVA test. The result of the study revealed that the developed algorithm was able to provide a better optimal solution compared to other algorithms. Dhiman and Kumar [44] developed an optimization algorithm called emperor penguin optimizer. The performance of the developed algorithm was evaluated on forty-four benchmark test functions by implementing seven nonlinear and mixed-integer structural problems. The result of the study demonstrated that the developed algorithm was able to provide better results than other metaheuristic problems. Dhiman and Kumar [45] proposed a bio-inspired algorithm named seagull optimization algorithm. The performance of seagull optimization algorithm was compared with forty-four benchmark functions. The result of the study revealed that the developed algorithm was able to solve large-scale constrained problems and was efficient in comparison to other optimization algorithms.Due to the problems encountered in production shop floor management, the present case study shows the elimination of waste and the improvement in productivity levels that have been possible through the proposed system. To substantiate this statement, a comparative analysis was performed on the present research work with previous research works. It was found from the analysis that the proposed methodology is superior in the elimination of each production problem and non-value-added activities in Industry 4.0. The comparative analysis on some important production conditions between previous researches and the present study has been shown in Table9.Table 9
Benefits of the proposed methodology in comparison of previous methodologies.
Industry conditionPrevious methodologiesProposed methodologyAuthorsChangesStatusChangesStatusProduction capacity[25]10.7%Improved66.67%ImprovedProduction cost[5]40%Improved46%ImprovedProduction lead time[34]1.07%Improved11.10%ImprovedManpower requirement[36]26.08%Improved34.09%ImprovedUtilization of machinery[25]8.9%Improved16.67%ImprovedShop floor utilization[21]NAImproved33.55%ImprovedReduction of defects[16]85.26%Improved88.89%ImprovedSetup time reduction[24]65.85%Improved72.37%ImprovedWorking environment[21]NAImprovedSafety, working time, workloadImprovedThe related work has been revealed by Dhiman et al. [46], who developed a metaheuristic algorithm named emperor penguin optimizer. Twenty-five benchmark functions validated the output of the developed algorithm. Furthermore, the result of the study demonstrated that the developed algorithm was superior in comparison to other algorithms. Dhiman [47] developed a bio-inspired metaheuristic optimization approach named emperor penguin and salp swarm algorithm. The efficiency of the developed algorithm was evaluated by convergence analysis, scalability analysis, ANOVA test, and sensitivity analysis. The result of the study revealed that the developed algorithm was superior and provided optimal solutions compared to other algorithms. Dhiman et al. [48] developed a bio-inspired optimization algorithm named rat swarm optimizer to solve optimization problems. In the study, the performance of the developed algorithm was validated by comparing it with eight optimization algorithms. The result of the experiment revealed that the developed algorithm was efficient in solving real-world optimization problems. Vaishnav et al. [49] performed a logical analysis on total death, total cases, and total recovery reported in the pandemic of COVID-19. In the study, decision tree regression and random forest models were used to perform logical analysis. The result of the study revealed that the prediction accuracy of the random forest model and a regression model was 76% and 70%, respectively.After a comparison of the proposed data-driven decision-making system with previous research works as suggested in the literature, it has been concluded that majorly three drawbacks were found in previous systems. The drawbacks included the inability to produce within limited resources, giant gaps in resource utilization, and poor working conditions on the production shop management. The present article proposed a data-driven decision-making system that pays attention to these drawbacks. The proposed methodology was proved superior by productivity enhancement obtained in results within limited constraints in Industry 4.0. The comparison between results obtained by the previous methodology and presented methodology as discussed in Table8 revealed that the proposed system is able to provide superior results within limited constraints in Industry 4.0.


### 4.2. Implementation ofL9 Taguchi Orthogonal Array to Reduce Production Time

The management teams were curious to optimize production processes in the present industry for operational enhancement because they were facing several problems in production management, including higher cycle time, inefficient workers, higher downtime, and excess power consumption. In the present work, brainstorming sessions have been organized with team members and workers to recognize the exact reason for problems in the production processes on the shop floor. Brainstorming sessions have concluded that the main reasons for the problem were the excess movement of workers due to lack of workload distribution, breakdown of material handling equipment due to lack of planning, shop floor congestion, disarrangement of machinery, outsourcing, and lack of monitoring system. Therefore, three parameters, including cycle time, number of operators, and available time, influenced operational performance on the shop floor. In the study, Minitab is used to design experiment-based Taguchi method considering three parameters with three levels in which level 1 is lowest and 3 is highest (Table10).Table 10
Experimental data used for the analysis.
Available time (mins)No. of operatorsCycle time (mins)PT (mins)SNRA34904352457820−77.86414904452608510−78.59864904552807544−77.5525204352608280−78.36065204452808832−78.92125204552458004−78.06615604352807590−77.60485604452458510−78.59865604552607590−77.6048Analysis of variance is used to identify the relative significance of the individual production parameters as illustrated in Table11. The table can conclude that the idle time, cycle time, and non-value-added time reduction have contributed efficiently.Table 11
Analysis of variance.
SourceDFSeq SSAdj SSAdj MSFPPercentage contributionAvailable time (mins)20.465620.465620.23280947.840.02022.40%No. of operators21.554391.554390.777196159.690.00674.78%Cycle time (mins)20.048960.048960.0244815.030.1662.36%Residual error20.009730.009730.0048670.47%Total82.07871ANOVA proved that number of operators is the most significant parameter effecting the production time and it contributes 74.78% to obtain minimum production time. Available time is also another significant parameter, and its contribution is 22.40%, while cycle time is insignificant. Table12 shows the model summary.Table 12
Model summary.
SR-SqR-Sq (adj)0.069899.53%98.13%The operational performance of production processes is analyzed by Taguchi’sL9 orthogonal array method and expressed in signal-to-noise ratio. This analysis is performed to obtain the precise operational setting for production time on the Industry 4.0 shop floor. Tables 13 and 14 illustrate the response table for the signal-to-noise ratio (smaller is better) and the means. Figures 9 and 10 show the analysis found on the signal-to-noise ratio.Table 13
Response table for signal-to-noise ratios.
LevelAvailable time (mins)No. of operatorsCycle time (mins)1−78.00−77.94−78.182−78.45−78.71−78.193−77.94−77.74−78.03Delta0.510.970.16Rank213Table 14
Response table for means.
LevelAvailable time (mins)No. of operatorsCycle time (mins)179587897811128372861781273789777137989Delta475905138Rank213Figure 9
Main effect plot for production time.Figure 10
Signal-to-noise ratio for production time.Response table for S/N ratio and means signifies that no. of operators is the important factor that effects production time followed by available time and cycle time.Main effects plot for production time reveals that available time of 520 minutes, cycle time of 5260 minutes, and number of operators of 44 yield minimum production time.


### 4.3. Validation of Methodology

The results of validation are compared with the estimated with the optimum production parameters. Minimum production time could be obtained at available time of 520 minutes, cycle time of 5260 minutes, and number of operators of 44 based upon the response plots as shown in Figures5 and 6 of production time analysis. This indicate that the obtained optimal setting of controllable factors for available time, cycle time, and number of operators results in the lower production time. As a result, Taguchi validation method as great potential application in highly competitive mining machinery shop floor industry due to its reliability and predictive accuracy in managing the process operating factors and limited number of trial experimentation required, which saves time, effort, and resources. As far as optimization and plan validation is concerned, the production time has been optimized by using L9 Taguchi orthogonal array by considering available time, cycle time, and number of operators as input parameters. This novel process optimization methodology has been strongly recommended to detect, mitigate, and eliminate the production uncertainties and non-value-added activities within available resources in order to achieve vital progressive objectives of Industry 4.0.A smart system should monitor some types of validations (constraints, resource conditions, workload distribution, workflow flexibility, shop floor capability, etc.). As discussed above, each type of validation is related to production efficiency or operational excellence on the shop floor [50]. Production efficiency means that the desired production process parameters can be improved by maximizing resources. At the same time, operational excellence demonstrates that eliminating waste can improve the desired production process parameter. The types of validations should be evaluated to investigate the production system’s actual effectiveness and significant for the improvement in production efficiency and elimination of waste [51].The developed system has been implemented to optimize production processes and identify waste. The proposed data-driven decision-making system uses the lean and smart manufacturing concept to execute production planning on the shop floor. Production evaluation shows that the production system has improved in terms of productivity level, floor layout, safety, production time, working environment and worker efficiency. The validation of the proposed methodology involves four levels of action according to the present industrial working environment: analysis of production enhancement in terms of production parameter and utilization of resources; comparison of improvement on the shop floor in terms of production conditions; comparative analysis between proposed system and previous system as suggested in previous research work; and validation of methodology by analysis of improvement achieved in production. These levels help validate the proposed methodology and can give the management system confidence that it can provide improvements in the production system with increased productivity in Industry 4.0. Figure11 describes improvement obtained on the production shop floor in terms of production parameter within available resources, and it validates that the proposed methodology will be helpful for the production management system in Industry 4.0.Figure 11
Improvement obtained in production parameters.


## 4.1. Development of the Current System in Order to Enhance the Operational Performance by Using Hybrid Integrated Lean and Smart Manufacturing Methodology

In line with the research, the objective raised the result demonstrated non-value-added activities and production time reduction and provided benefits in production improvement within limited constraints through the proposed methodology using the shop floor management method for the mining machinery assembly unit in Industry 4.0. In this production management application study, production time reduction was successfully achieved by reducing the waste by facing the challenges of complex environments of the production shop floor. Authors used a new methodology on production shop floor conditions, logically followed only production workflow which does not get into the concept of production management methods, like production parameters, production factors within limited contraints which have been promoted by the previous researchers. The study reports overall production time reduction within available constraints on the production shop floor. To know actual improvement achieved by proposed methodology implementation, an analysis has done between previous condition and improved condition of the production shop floor. The analysis of production enhancement has been shown in Table8.Table 8
Analysis of improvement in terms of production parameter and utilization of resource.
Name of shopProduction parametersUtilization of resourceCT (minutes)CO (minutes)IT (minutes)NVAT (minutes)UT (%)No. of workerMachineryShop floor area (square meter)Assembly45255303.972Yes224.9Fabrication3059510519012.562Yes0Painting3752550204.350NA89.1Roll off and hot testing601020301.761NA837.5Installment501540552.712Yes110.8Inspection1005503Yes0The similar results have been found out by Dehghani et al. [37], who proposed a new game-based optimization algorithm named dart game optimizer. The quality and ability of the performance of dart game optimizer was checked by twenty-three objective functions and was compared with other eight optimization algorithms, including particle swarm optimization, genetic algorithm, gravitational search algorithm, grey wolf optimizer, teaching learning-based algorithm, grasshopper optimization algorithm, marine predators algorithm, and whale optimization algorithm. The result of the study showed that the developed algorithm was efficient and able to exploit and explore in solving different optimization problems. Dehghani et al. [38] developed a new optimizer named multileader optimizer to solve optimization problems. The designed optimizer was used to conduct the algorithm toward a quasi-optimal solution by using information from population members. The result of the study showed that the developed algorithm was superior in solving optimization problems. Dehghani et al. [39] developed a binary model of orientation search algorithm named binary orientation search algorithm. The twenty-three benchmark test functions tested the developed model. The result of the study showed that the developed model was able to solve optimization problems efficiently.Dehghani et al. [40] developed a spring search algorithm to solve single-objective constraints optimization problems. The functionality of the developed algorithm was evaluated by thirty-eight established test mark functions and compared with other eight optimization algorithms, including a teaching learning-based algorithm, genetic algorithm, gravitational search algorithm, grasshopper optimization algorithm, particle swarm optimization, a spotted hyena optimizer, a grey wolf optimizer, and emperor penguin optimizer. The result of the study showed that the developed algorithm has superior exploitation and exploration capabilities compared to other algorithms.The proposed methodology has been efficiently implemented in the present case example of Industry 4.0, in which systematic work planning has been helpful for the reduction in congestion on the shop floor and results in productivity enhancement. Productivity improvement on the shop floor in terms of production parameters has been shown in Figure8.Figure 8
Analysis on parameter between present and proposed shop floor (P1-observed shop floor condition, P2-modified shop floor condition).The similar results have been reported by Dhiman and Kumar [41], who developed a metaheuristic algorithm called spotted hyena optimizer. The developed algorithm was implemented to one unconstrained engineering design problem and five real-life constraints and compared with eight algorithms on twenty-nine benchmark test functions. The result of the study demonstrated that the developed algorithm was better than other metaheuristic algorithms. Dhiman and Kaur [42] developed a bio-inspired algorithm named sooty tern optimization algorithm for constrained industrial problems. The developed algorithm was implemented to solve six constrained industrial applications and compared with nine algorithms over forty-four benchmark functions. The result of the study revealed that the developed model was able to solve constrained problems and was efficient in comparison to other algorithms. Kaur et al. [43] proposed a bio-inspired algorithm named tunicate swarm algorithm. The performance of the tunicate swarm algorithm was evaluated on seventy-four benchmark test problems by ANOVA test. The result of the study revealed that the developed algorithm was able to provide a better optimal solution compared to other algorithms. Dhiman and Kumar [44] developed an optimization algorithm called emperor penguin optimizer. The performance of the developed algorithm was evaluated on forty-four benchmark test functions by implementing seven nonlinear and mixed-integer structural problems. The result of the study demonstrated that the developed algorithm was able to provide better results than other metaheuristic problems. Dhiman and Kumar [45] proposed a bio-inspired algorithm named seagull optimization algorithm. The performance of seagull optimization algorithm was compared with forty-four benchmark functions. The result of the study revealed that the developed algorithm was able to solve large-scale constrained problems and was efficient in comparison to other optimization algorithms.Due to the problems encountered in production shop floor management, the present case study shows the elimination of waste and the improvement in productivity levels that have been possible through the proposed system. To substantiate this statement, a comparative analysis was performed on the present research work with previous research works. It was found from the analysis that the proposed methodology is superior in the elimination of each production problem and non-value-added activities in Industry 4.0. The comparative analysis on some important production conditions between previous researches and the present study has been shown in Table9.Table 9
Benefits of the proposed methodology in comparison of previous methodologies.
Industry conditionPrevious methodologiesProposed methodologyAuthorsChangesStatusChangesStatusProduction capacity[25]10.7%Improved66.67%ImprovedProduction cost[5]40%Improved46%ImprovedProduction lead time[34]1.07%Improved11.10%ImprovedManpower requirement[36]26.08%Improved34.09%ImprovedUtilization of machinery[25]8.9%Improved16.67%ImprovedShop floor utilization[21]NAImproved33.55%ImprovedReduction of defects[16]85.26%Improved88.89%ImprovedSetup time reduction[24]65.85%Improved72.37%ImprovedWorking environment[21]NAImprovedSafety, working time, workloadImprovedThe related work has been revealed by Dhiman et al. [46], who developed a metaheuristic algorithm named emperor penguin optimizer. Twenty-five benchmark functions validated the output of the developed algorithm. Furthermore, the result of the study demonstrated that the developed algorithm was superior in comparison to other algorithms. Dhiman [47] developed a bio-inspired metaheuristic optimization approach named emperor penguin and salp swarm algorithm. The efficiency of the developed algorithm was evaluated by convergence analysis, scalability analysis, ANOVA test, and sensitivity analysis. The result of the study revealed that the developed algorithm was superior and provided optimal solutions compared to other algorithms. Dhiman et al. [48] developed a bio-inspired optimization algorithm named rat swarm optimizer to solve optimization problems. In the study, the performance of the developed algorithm was validated by comparing it with eight optimization algorithms. The result of the experiment revealed that the developed algorithm was efficient in solving real-world optimization problems. Vaishnav et al. [49] performed a logical analysis on total death, total cases, and total recovery reported in the pandemic of COVID-19. In the study, decision tree regression and random forest models were used to perform logical analysis. The result of the study revealed that the prediction accuracy of the random forest model and a regression model was 76% and 70%, respectively.After a comparison of the proposed data-driven decision-making system with previous research works as suggested in the literature, it has been concluded that majorly three drawbacks were found in previous systems. The drawbacks included the inability to produce within limited resources, giant gaps in resource utilization, and poor working conditions on the production shop management. The present article proposed a data-driven decision-making system that pays attention to these drawbacks. The proposed methodology was proved superior by productivity enhancement obtained in results within limited constraints in Industry 4.0. The comparison between results obtained by the previous methodology and presented methodology as discussed in Table8 revealed that the proposed system is able to provide superior results within limited constraints in Industry 4.0.


## 4.2. Implementation ofL9 Taguchi Orthogonal Array to Reduce Production Time

The management teams were curious to optimize production processes in the present industry for operational enhancement because they were facing several problems in production management, including higher cycle time, inefficient workers, higher downtime, and excess power consumption. In the present work, brainstorming sessions have been organized with team members and workers to recognize the exact reason for problems in the production processes on the shop floor. Brainstorming sessions have concluded that the main reasons for the problem were the excess movement of workers due to lack of workload distribution, breakdown of material handling equipment due to lack of planning, shop floor congestion, disarrangement of machinery, outsourcing, and lack of monitoring system. Therefore, three parameters, including cycle time, number of operators, and available time, influenced operational performance on the shop floor. In the study, Minitab is used to design experiment-based Taguchi method considering three parameters with three levels in which level 1 is lowest and 3 is highest (Table10).Table 10
Experimental data used for the analysis.
Available time (mins)No. of operatorsCycle time (mins)PT (mins)SNRA34904352457820−77.86414904452608510−78.59864904552807544−77.5525204352608280−78.36065204452808832−78.92125204552458004−78.06615604352807590−77.60485604452458510−78.59865604552607590−77.6048Analysis of variance is used to identify the relative significance of the individual production parameters as illustrated in Table11. The table can conclude that the idle time, cycle time, and non-value-added time reduction have contributed efficiently.Table 11
Analysis of variance.
SourceDFSeq SSAdj SSAdj MSFPPercentage contributionAvailable time (mins)20.465620.465620.23280947.840.02022.40%No. of operators21.554391.554390.777196159.690.00674.78%Cycle time (mins)20.048960.048960.0244815.030.1662.36%Residual error20.009730.009730.0048670.47%Total82.07871ANOVA proved that number of operators is the most significant parameter effecting the production time and it contributes 74.78% to obtain minimum production time. Available time is also another significant parameter, and its contribution is 22.40%, while cycle time is insignificant. Table12 shows the model summary.Table 12
Model summary.
SR-SqR-Sq (adj)0.069899.53%98.13%The operational performance of production processes is analyzed by Taguchi’sL9 orthogonal array method and expressed in signal-to-noise ratio. This analysis is performed to obtain the precise operational setting for production time on the Industry 4.0 shop floor. Tables 13 and 14 illustrate the response table for the signal-to-noise ratio (smaller is better) and the means. Figures 9 and 10 show the analysis found on the signal-to-noise ratio.Table 13
Response table for signal-to-noise ratios.
LevelAvailable time (mins)No. of operatorsCycle time (mins)1−78.00−77.94−78.182−78.45−78.71−78.193−77.94−77.74−78.03Delta0.510.970.16Rank213Table 14
Response table for means.
LevelAvailable time (mins)No. of operatorsCycle time (mins)179587897811128372861781273789777137989Delta475905138Rank213Figure 9
Main effect plot for production time.Figure 10
Signal-to-noise ratio for production time.Response table for S/N ratio and means signifies that no. of operators is the important factor that effects production time followed by available time and cycle time.Main effects plot for production time reveals that available time of 520 minutes, cycle time of 5260 minutes, and number of operators of 44 yield minimum production time.


## 4.3. Validation of Methodology

The results of validation are compared with the estimated with the optimum production parameters. Minimum production time could be obtained at available time of 520 minutes, cycle time of 5260 minutes, and number of operators of 44 based upon the response plots as shown in Figures5 and 6 of production time analysis. This indicate that the obtained optimal setting of controllable factors for available time, cycle time, and number of operators results in the lower production time. As a result, Taguchi validation method as great potential application in highly competitive mining machinery shop floor industry due to its reliability and predictive accuracy in managing the process operating factors and limited number of trial experimentation required, which saves time, effort, and resources. As far as optimization and plan validation is concerned, the production time has been optimized by using L9 Taguchi orthogonal array by considering available time, cycle time, and number of operators as input parameters. This novel process optimization methodology has been strongly recommended to detect, mitigate, and eliminate the production uncertainties and non-value-added activities within available resources in order to achieve vital progressive objectives of Industry 4.0.A smart system should monitor some types of validations (constraints, resource conditions, workload distribution, workflow flexibility, shop floor capability, etc.). As discussed above, each type of validation is related to production efficiency or operational excellence on the shop floor [50]. Production efficiency means that the desired production process parameters can be improved by maximizing resources. At the same time, operational excellence demonstrates that eliminating waste can improve the desired production process parameter. The types of validations should be evaluated to investigate the production system’s actual effectiveness and significant for the improvement in production efficiency and elimination of waste [51].The developed system has been implemented to optimize production processes and identify waste. The proposed data-driven decision-making system uses the lean and smart manufacturing concept to execute production planning on the shop floor. Production evaluation shows that the production system has improved in terms of productivity level, floor layout, safety, production time, working environment and worker efficiency. The validation of the proposed methodology involves four levels of action according to the present industrial working environment: analysis of production enhancement in terms of production parameter and utilization of resources; comparison of improvement on the shop floor in terms of production conditions; comparative analysis between proposed system and previous system as suggested in previous research work; and validation of methodology by analysis of improvement achieved in production. These levels help validate the proposed methodology and can give the management system confidence that it can provide improvements in the production system with increased productivity in Industry 4.0. Figure11 describes improvement obtained on the production shop floor in terms of production parameter within available resources, and it validates that the proposed methodology will be helpful for the production management system in Industry 4.0.Figure 11
Improvement obtained in production parameters.


## 5. Notable Contributions of Lean and Smart Manufacturing Concept in Industry 4.0

The production management team members emphasize developing a decision-making system to enhance operational excellence in complex manufacturing environments, including Industry 4.0, using process optimization methods. Various process optimization methods that have been used in previous research work for shop floor management include smart manufacturing, artificial neural network, lean manufacturing, Internet of things, and cyber-physical system. In an extensive literature review, it has been found that the researchers and industry individuals preferred to implement lean manufacturing concept on the shop floor, but industrial revolutions and changes have led to a demand for new methods in shop floor management. The researchers focus on developing a hybrid method for operations management on the shop floor to accomplish this. The hybrid method uses the integration of two or more methods to enhance the adaptability of operational excellence in production processes on the shop floor. Lean and smart manufacturing concepts works as hybrid method and fulfil this need of the industry individuals to enhance productivity within limited constraints. Implementing lean manufacturing in the shop floor management, including Industry 4.0, can effectively improve operational excellence when integrated with the smart manufacturing concept. Ghobakhloo and Ching [52] discussed the identification of determinants of smart manufacturing-related information and digital technologies. The data for analysis were collected from an electronic survey and questionnaire organized in Malaysian and Iranian small and medium enterprises. The results showed that smart manufacturing-related information and digital technologies were costly for most small and medium enterprises and significantly influenced by the imposition from the environment. Tripathi et al. [53] developed an agile system to improve operational performance using a methodology coupled with VSM. The developed method was validated by improving the operating performance of a production management system in Industry 4.0 environment. Furthermore, the result of the study revealed that the developed system was able to enhance operational excellence by eliminating waste within available resources in Industry 4.0.Li [54] developed a conceptual model using lean, smart manufacturing and implemented it in the bicycle industry. The result of the study demonstrated that lean and smart manufacturing could enhance operational excellence of the management system by setting up a smart factory platform in Industry 4.0. Dey et al. [55] proposed smart chain management for imperfect production processes where demand rate was variable and demand depended on the advertisement. The study developed a mathematical model to identify imperfect items in production processes for making more innovative processes. The results revealed that the developed model could help managers reduce total costs and enhance system profit. Chiarini and Kumar [56] investigated on the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies and lean six sigma. The analysis has been done by direct observations and interviewing experts and managers of ten Italian manufacturing industries. The result demonstrated that lean six sigma could enhance outcomes effectively by using Industry 4.0 technologies. Amjad et al. [57] developed a framework for integration of green manufacturing, lean manufacturing, and Industry 4.0 in harmonious way. The framework was validated by implementing in an auto-parts manufacturing industry. The result of the study demonstrated that the developed framework was efficiently optimized and reduced the lead time, value-added time, greenhouses gas emission, and non-value-added time emission effectively by 25.60%, 24.68%, 55%, and 56.20%, respectively.It has been observed that the hybrid methods attract the attention of researchers in operation management on the shop floor because of the enhancement of operational excellence within limited constraints [4, 12, 16, 24, 26, 47, 56, 58]. The present research work focuses to develop a data-driven decision-making system using lean and smart manufacturing for smart and safer shop floor management. The developed system has been validated by implementing it in an actual production condition for the shop floor management. The study revealed that the developed data-driven decision-making system enables the shop floor management teams to enhance productivity and industrial sustainability by eliminating waste within available resources in Industry 4.0. Figure 12 demonstrates the benefits of the developed data-driven decision-making system compared to previous research outcomes regarding standardized factors of the shop floor management system.Figure 12
Description of benefits of the developed system in comparison with findings of previous research works.Lean and smart manufacturing is a prevalent approach for operation management on the shop floor and it is used to enhance operational performance by optimization of processes and elimination of waste. Lean and smart concept helps industry individual in improvement in operational control on the shop floor by understanding and analyzing actual production condition. The management teams use various standard parameters to evaluate the observed production system using lean and smart manufacturing. The parameters include available time, uptime, worker, changeover time, cycle time, idle time, and non-value-added time.In previous research works, it has been observed that available time has been calculated by finding the difference between total working hours and break time; uptime is measured as the difference between available time and changeover time and the ratio between their available time; the number of operators has been calculated by observing allotment of workers at each workstation; change over time has been computed by observing time taken for changing time between two processes including setup time; cycle time has been calculated by completion time of each process; the non-value-added time has been computed by the sum of changeover time and idle time; and idle time has been measured by observing the time in which no any activity performed. These parameters are used to investigate the actual performance of the shop floor management system. The researchers and management teams used all the parameters in previous research works to identify the primary source of the problem. The parameters help industry individuals to understand and control production processes by implementing a robust action plan.Ramani and Lingan [13] improved the performance of the production management system by implementing value stream mapping in an industry of gas-insulated switchgear design. Value stream mapping is a lean-based method to enhance productivity by eliminating waste. The management team members drew an actual shop floor diagram using the value stream mapping principle to identify and eliminate sources of waste. Results showed a 30% improvement in productivity and a 30% reduction in man-hours. Sutharsan et al. [59] examined the application of the lean concept in the Monoblock pump industry using value stream mapping. Value stream mapping improved the workflow chart diagram of production processes by eliminating waste by calculating parameters including available time, lead time, value-added time, and cycle time. The study showed a reduction in lead time, cycle time, and defect rate by 1.4 days, 12.8 minutes, and 2%, respectively. Sahoo et al. [5] developed a systematic strategy to implement Taguchi’s method’s lean concept. The developed strategy was implemented in a forging industry for improvement in operational performance by the elimination of waste. The study’s result revealed a significant reduction in non-value-added activities, shop floor area, and lead time by 72 minutes, 27%, and 325 minutes, respectively. Tripathi et al. [60] developed a model for shop floor management using an artificial neural network coupled with value stream mapping. The developed model was implemented in an earthmoving equipment machinery manufacturing unit. In the study, value stream mapping was used to enhance operational performance by eliminating waste. In addition, various parameters were analyzed, including available time, uptime, cycle time, uptime, non-value-added time, and the number of workers, to understand the present production shop floor condition. The developed model was machine learning-based and tested by proposed shop floor management. The result of the study revealed that the developed model was efficient for prediction purposes with mean absolute error and mean square error.


## 6. Conclusions

In the present research article, a methodology has been developed for robust regulation of shop floor management in uncertain production conditions in Industry 4.0. It has been observed that lean and smart manufacturing is able to control uncertain production conditions on the shop floor in Industry 4.0. The proposed data-driven decision-making system enables the management team to enhance productivity and industrial sustainability within limited constraints in Industry 4.0. From the reported result, it was observed that the proposed system significantly improved the efficiency of production management and operational performance by suggesting smart systems. The results of the study showed that a substantial reduction in production time and cost has been achieved. In this article, the authors suggested an ingenious methodology that allows a simultaneous optimization and process parameter validation that is production time by using Taguchi approach in order to provide more flexibility and productivity efficiency for shop floor management in Industry 4.0. Based on the results obtained under validation of Taguchi method, ANOVA results evidenced that number of operators is the most significant parameter effecting the production time and it contributes 74.78% to obtain minimum production time. Available time is also another significant parameter, and its contribution is 22.40%, while cycle time is insignificant. The developed data-driven decision-making system would be a benchmarking and problem-solving for enhancement in productivity and provide a smart production management system using lean and smart manufacturing principles in Industry 4.0. The authors of the present research work strongly believe that the developed system would be beneficial to industry individuals in the smart production shop floor management system in the uncertain condition in Industry 4.0. The study helps control operational excellence by reducing waste and idle time through the TaguchiL9 orthogonal array method and enhancing its effectiveness using lean and smart manufacturing. Thus, we can suggest that the advanced Taguchi approach could be applicable for industrial environments at optimal production process parameter with high-quality statistical design to enhance the operational excellence. Furthermore, the finding can be used for those production conditions where the production time and resources consumption increase due to excessive changes in adjustments of production processes.


## 7. Future Scope

The implementation of an appropriate strategy is a crucial decision for shop floor management. Therefore, industry people emphasize developing a robust decision-making system and guidelines to make this decision right [6, 9, 16, 26, 53, 56, 58, 60, 61]. The present research focuses on developing a data-driven decision-making system for sustainable shop floor management using lean and smart manufacturing concepts. The developed system has been validated by implementing it in a real production shop floor management condition of Industry 4.0. The result revealed that the developed system could enhance production efficiency and financial profitability within limited constraints. Furthermore, the developed decision-making system’s efficacy can be improved by implementing lean principle with other process optimization methods for shop floor management in different production conditions, including Industry 4.0.



---

*Source: 3012215-2022-05-12.xml*