# Polymeric Foams as the Matrix of Voltammetric Sensors for the Detection of Catechol, Hydroquinone, and Their Mixtures

Authors: C. Fernandez-Blanco; M. Mugica; M. A. Rodriguez-Perez; C. Garcia-Cabezón; M. L. Rodriguez-Mendez
Journal: Journal of Sensors
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Porous electrodes based on polymethylmethacrylate and graphite foams (PMMA_G_F) have been developed and characterized. Such devices have been successfully used as voltammetric sensors to analyze catechol, hydroquinone, and their mixtures. The presence of pores induces important changes in the oxidation/reduction mechanism of catechol and hydroquinone with respect to the sensing properties observed in nonfoamed PMMA_graphite electrodes (PMMA_G). The electropolymerization processes of catechol or hydroquinone at the electrode surface observed using PMMA_G do not occur at the surface of the foamed PMM_G_F. In addition, the limits of detection observed in foamed electrodes are one order of magnitude lower than the observed in the nonfoamed electrodes. Moreover, foamed electrodes can be used to detect simultaneously both isomers and a remarkable increase in the electrocatalytic properties shown by the foamed samples, produces a decrease in the oxidation potential peak of catechol in presence of hydroquinone, from +0.7 V to +0.3 V. Peak currents increased linearly with concentration of catechol in presence of hydroquinone over the range of 0.37·10−3 M to 1.69·10−3 M with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.27 mM. These effects demonstrate the advantages obtained by increasing the active surface by means of porous structures.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The assessment of antioxidants in foods is of great importance due to the health benefits associated to their intake, to their influence in the organoleptic characteristics of foods and beverages, and to their role in their preservation. Catechol (1,2-dihydroxybenze, CT) and hydroquinone (1,4-dihydroxybenze, HQ) are two dihydroxybenzene isomers that occur naturally in many plant foods (onions, coffee, tea leaves, etc.) and beverages such as wines [1].Simultaneous detection of dihydroxybenzene isomers as CT and HQ is difficult because they have similar structure and characteristics. The main methods for the determination of CT and HQ mixtures are high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [2–5], gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry [5, 6], spectrophotometry [7–9], fluorescence [10, 11], chemiluminescence [12–14], or capillary electrochromatography [15, 16]. Among all these techniques, electrochemical methods represent an advantage due to their low price, high sensitivity, short experimental times, and portability [17, 18].The simultaneous assessment of CT and HQ at conventional carbon electrodes is difficult because their similar chemical structures lead to resembling responses which produce an overlap of their redox peaks [19–21]. In order to overcome this problem, electrodes have been chemically modified with many materials such as activated glassy carbon [22], modified electrodes with graphene [18, 23–26], carbon nanoparticles [27], carbon nanofibers [28, 29], carbon nanotubes [30], or gold nanoparticles [29, 31].In addition, electrodes can be modified using different techniques, leading to electrodes with distinct characteristics which depend (among other factors) in the number of active sites at the electrode surface. Thus, the sensitivity and limits of detection can be improved by increasing the number of active sites at the electrode surface. Different strategies can be used to increase the number of active sites such as the use of layered hydroxide films [24], mesoporous materials [25], or nanostructured sensing layers [32, 33]. A different approach could be to use foamed materials as the sensing element. Recently, foams from metals like nickel [34–36] or copper [37–39] have been developed to obtain efficient electrochemical sensors. These electrodes show a high specific active surface, but they are not ideal materials to fabricate electrodes because they have redox activity. Foamed carbon materials are also good candidates, but the electrodes are fragile.Our group proposes here a new class of foamed electrodes based on a polymeric matrix. The reason is that polymeric foams are easy to obtain and the pore size and structure can be easily controlled. In addition, their conductivity can be improved by doping the foam with a carbonaceous material. In particular, in this work, a composite foam formed by a polymeric matrix of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and graphite as the conductive additive is developed here using the gas dissolution foaming method in which the saturation temperature, foaming temperature, and saturation pressure are controlled parameters during the foaming process [40]. The obtained foams have been employed as electrochemical sensors for the detection of CT and HQ which are two phenols of high interest for food industry. The dynamic properties of the electrodes and the limits of detection have been evaluated. The possibility of distinguishing these similar isomers has been analyzed.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Chemicals

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) V 825T was kindly supplied by ALTUGLAS® International (Colombes, France) in the form of pellets. The material used presents a density (ρ) of 1.19 g·cm−3 (measured at 23°C and 50% HR) and a glass transition temperature (Tg) of 114.5°C measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Medical grade CO2 (99.9% purity) was used as blowing agent.Catechol (CT), hydroquinone (HQ), and KCl were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and graphite (G) (>99%) was purchase from Fluka. Chloroform stabilized with ethanol was purchased from Scharlab. All chemicals were used as received. Aqueous solutions were prepared using high-quality water (resistivity of 18.2 MΩ·cm−1) from a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).


### 2.2. Sensor Preparation

1.4 g of PMMA was dissolved in 32 mL of hot chloroform (50°C). Then, the solution was placed in a Petri dish to evaporate the solvent until a PMMA film was obtained.Working in a similar way, films of PMMA/graphite (2/1) were prepared. Previously, the mixture was homogenized using a sonicator probe (Vibra Cell sonics) to get a good dispersion of graphite in the PMMA solution. This PMMA/graphite ratio was chosen according to preliminary experiments that showed that using lower amounts of graphite did not produce enough conductivity to be used as sensitive material.Foamed samples were produced in a high pressure vessel (model PARR 4681) provided by Parr Instrument Company (Moline, IL, USA). The pressure system comprises an accurate pressure pump controller (model SFT-10) provided by Supercritical Fluid Technologies Inc. With this set-up, a set of foaming experiments has been performed through the so-called gas dissolution foaming process. This process consists of two basic steps. The first one is the saturation of the polymeric sample with gas under high pressure. In this step, the gas reaches an equilibrium concentration when given enough time for diffusion of gas into the polymer, giving rise to a gas-polymer system. In the second step, bubbles are nucleated in the gas-polymer system by means of a thermodynamic instability which, in this specific case, can be obtained by a sudden drop in pressure [41]. The foaming experiments have been performed by a single-step foaming process [40] to prevent fast diffusion of the gas during the extraction of the polymer films from the autoclave after saturation. In this process, the gas saturation temperature is higher than the Tg,ef of the polymer (which is in a rubbery state), allowing the gas expansion during the pressure release. Hence, the samples are already foamed when extracted from the pressure vessel. In these tests, the saturation pressure has been set at 30 MPa. Saturation temperature and saturation time were fixed at 50°C and 24 h. After saturation, the pressure was released at a high depressurization rate (90 MPa/s) by means of an electrovalve.Moreover, gas diffusion can provoke heterogeneous cellular structures in the samples even on the single-step foaming method. Consequently, films have been confined in a mold consisting of two aluminum frames (Figure1), restricting CO2 surface diffusion and increasing the gas availability for cell nucleation and growth [42]. The mold was closed by means a torque wrench so as the screws reach the same tighten level, achieving the desired constrainment effect.Figure 1
Aluminum frame used to constrain the films during the foaming tests.


### 2.3. Structure Characterization by SEM

A scanning electron microscope (Quanta 200 FEG, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used to obtain images of both the surface and the inner structure of the foams. Images of the surface were obtained by covering the surface with gold using a sputter coater (model SDC 005, Balzers Union, Balzers, Liechtenstein). Images of the inner structure were obtained by fracturing the samples: samples were cooled down with liquid nitrogen and then fractured and coated with gold using a sputtering.


### 2.4. Electrochemical Measurements

Electrochemical experiments were carried out using a PARSTAT 2273 potentiostat/galvanostat (AMETEK scientific instrument) in a three-cell configuration. A platinum foil with a size of 2 cm × 1 cm and a Ag/AgCl/KCl 3M electrode was used as counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively. PMMA samples were used as the working electrode including a PMMA film (PMMA), a PMMA foam (PMMA_F), a PMMA film doped with graphite (2/1), which is denoted as PMMA_G, and a PMMA foam doped with graphite (2/1) which is denoted as PMMA_F_G.Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out in a 0.1 M KCl solution with a frequency range from 31600 Hz to 0.1 Hz with signal amplitude of 10 mV at a working potential of 0.0 V.Square wave voltammetry was used for studying the response for our sensors towards phenols. The reason to use this  technique is that it reduces the faradaic current, producing lower limits of detection than cyclic voltammetry [43]. Calibration curves were built using square wave voltammetry (SWV) as electrochemical technique from −0.6 V to +1.0 V at a scan rate of 50 mV/s with an amplitude pulse of 50 mV, a duration of pulse of 0.02 s, and a step height of 2 mV. Dynamic properties were evaluated carrying out a cyclic voltammetry in a 0.1 M of KCl solution that contains 10−3 M of CT from −0.5 V to +1.5 V for increasing scan rates (from 0.1 V/s to 0.3 mV/s).


## 2.1. Chemicals

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) V 825T was kindly supplied by ALTUGLAS® International (Colombes, France) in the form of pellets. The material used presents a density (ρ) of 1.19 g·cm−3 (measured at 23°C and 50% HR) and a glass transition temperature (Tg) of 114.5°C measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Medical grade CO2 (99.9% purity) was used as blowing agent.Catechol (CT), hydroquinone (HQ), and KCl were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and graphite (G) (>99%) was purchase from Fluka. Chloroform stabilized with ethanol was purchased from Scharlab. All chemicals were used as received. Aqueous solutions were prepared using high-quality water (resistivity of 18.2 MΩ·cm−1) from a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).


## 2.2. Sensor Preparation

1.4 g of PMMA was dissolved in 32 mL of hot chloroform (50°C). Then, the solution was placed in a Petri dish to evaporate the solvent until a PMMA film was obtained.Working in a similar way, films of PMMA/graphite (2/1) were prepared. Previously, the mixture was homogenized using a sonicator probe (Vibra Cell sonics) to get a good dispersion of graphite in the PMMA solution. This PMMA/graphite ratio was chosen according to preliminary experiments that showed that using lower amounts of graphite did not produce enough conductivity to be used as sensitive material.Foamed samples were produced in a high pressure vessel (model PARR 4681) provided by Parr Instrument Company (Moline, IL, USA). The pressure system comprises an accurate pressure pump controller (model SFT-10) provided by Supercritical Fluid Technologies Inc. With this set-up, a set of foaming experiments has been performed through the so-called gas dissolution foaming process. This process consists of two basic steps. The first one is the saturation of the polymeric sample with gas under high pressure. In this step, the gas reaches an equilibrium concentration when given enough time for diffusion of gas into the polymer, giving rise to a gas-polymer system. In the second step, bubbles are nucleated in the gas-polymer system by means of a thermodynamic instability which, in this specific case, can be obtained by a sudden drop in pressure [41]. The foaming experiments have been performed by a single-step foaming process [40] to prevent fast diffusion of the gas during the extraction of the polymer films from the autoclave after saturation. In this process, the gas saturation temperature is higher than the Tg,ef of the polymer (which is in a rubbery state), allowing the gas expansion during the pressure release. Hence, the samples are already foamed when extracted from the pressure vessel. In these tests, the saturation pressure has been set at 30 MPa. Saturation temperature and saturation time were fixed at 50°C and 24 h. After saturation, the pressure was released at a high depressurization rate (90 MPa/s) by means of an electrovalve.Moreover, gas diffusion can provoke heterogeneous cellular structures in the samples even on the single-step foaming method. Consequently, films have been confined in a mold consisting of two aluminum frames (Figure1), restricting CO2 surface diffusion and increasing the gas availability for cell nucleation and growth [42]. The mold was closed by means a torque wrench so as the screws reach the same tighten level, achieving the desired constrainment effect.Figure 1
Aluminum frame used to constrain the films during the foaming tests.


## 2.3. Structure Characterization by SEM

A scanning electron microscope (Quanta 200 FEG, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used to obtain images of both the surface and the inner structure of the foams. Images of the surface were obtained by covering the surface with gold using a sputter coater (model SDC 005, Balzers Union, Balzers, Liechtenstein). Images of the inner structure were obtained by fracturing the samples: samples were cooled down with liquid nitrogen and then fractured and coated with gold using a sputtering.


## 2.4. Electrochemical Measurements

Electrochemical experiments were carried out using a PARSTAT 2273 potentiostat/galvanostat (AMETEK scientific instrument) in a three-cell configuration. A platinum foil with a size of 2 cm × 1 cm and a Ag/AgCl/KCl 3M electrode was used as counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively. PMMA samples were used as the working electrode including a PMMA film (PMMA), a PMMA foam (PMMA_F), a PMMA film doped with graphite (2/1), which is denoted as PMMA_G, and a PMMA foam doped with graphite (2/1) which is denoted as PMMA_F_G.Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out in a 0.1 M KCl solution with a frequency range from 31600 Hz to 0.1 Hz with signal amplitude of 10 mV at a working potential of 0.0 V.Square wave voltammetry was used for studying the response for our sensors towards phenols. The reason to use this  technique is that it reduces the faradaic current, producing lower limits of detection than cyclic voltammetry [43]. Calibration curves were built using square wave voltammetry (SWV) as electrochemical technique from −0.6 V to +1.0 V at a scan rate of 50 mV/s with an amplitude pulse of 50 mV, a duration of pulse of 0.02 s, and a step height of 2 mV. Dynamic properties were evaluated carrying out a cyclic voltammetry in a 0.1 M of KCl solution that contains 10−3 M of CT from −0.5 V to +1.5 V for increasing scan rates (from 0.1 V/s to 0.3 mV/s).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Structural Characterization of the Electrodes

In a first step, both the internal and the surface structure of the foamed samples were characterized using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). This information was used to evaluate the influence of the porosity of the samples in the sensing properties of PMMA/graphite composites.Figure2(a) shows the internal structure of the PMMA foam (PMMA_F) where a homogeneous microporous structure with an average pore diameter of 2 μm was observed. The image of the foam surface (Figure 2(b)) showed larger pores with irregular shapes and sizes with an average diameter of 7 μm. When PMMA foam was doped with graphite (PMMA_F_G), the internal porous structure changed. Large pores with 100 μm diameter were accompanied by many small pores with an average diameter of 12 μm (Figure 2(c)). It is also noticeable that the pores were more irregular in shape than those observed in the undoped PMMA_F. This effect can be attributed to the presence of the graphite flakes that modify the foaming process. The surface structure changed drastically in the presence of graphite, and a profusion of small pores of about 4 μm diameter (Figure 2(d)) was observed.Figure 2
SEM images of (a) PMMA_F inner structure, (b) PMMA_F surface structure, (c) PMMA_F_G inner structure, and (d) PMMA_F_G surface structure.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.2. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) Characterization

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used to study the changes in the electrochemical properties of PMMA induced by the insertion of graphite and by the foaming.As expected, the Nyquist plots of nonfoamed PMMA and foamed PMMA_F immersed in 0.1 M KCl showed vertical straight lines, confirming that undoped samples behaved as insulators.When graphite was added to the structure of a PMMA film (PMMA_G) or a PMMA foam (PMMA_F_G), samples became conductive and the Nyquist diagram (Figure3(a)) revealed two unfinished capacitive loops. The semicircle in the high frequency region showed a smaller radius than the large arc observed in the low frequency region. As observed in Figure 3(a), the radii increased in foamed samples. Given that radii of the semicircles are related to the efficiency of the charge transfer, it can be concluded that the electron transfer resistance was higher in the foamed sample. In good accordance, the Bode plots showed that the impedance modulus of the foamed PMMA_F_G was more than one order of magnitude larger than in the nonfoamed PMMA_G (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)).Figure 3
(a) Nyquist and (b) impedance Bode plot and (c) phase Bode plot of PMMA_G film and PMMA_F_G in 0.1 M KCl. Frequency swept from 31,600 Hz to 0.1 Hz at 0 V in a 0.1 M KCl solution.
(a)
(b)
(c)In order to calculate the charge transfer resistance, the impedance values were fitted to the electrical circuit shown in Figure4. In the proposed model, two constant phase elements CPE (representing a nonideal capacitive response of the interface material solution) and two resistances were used. The depression in the Nyquist semicircle and the phase angle of capacitor different from −90° are an indication of this non-pure capacitive behavior. The impedance of a CPE element was defined as:
(1)ZCPE=1Cjωn,where C is a parameter numerically equal to the admittance at ω = 1 rad·s−1, j is the imaginary unit, ω is the frequency, and n is the phase shift. When n=1 the CPE describes an ideal capacitor, when n=0 is an ideal resistor and, when n≈0.5 is a finite-Warburg element accounting for diffusion of mobile charge. In practice, n is in the range of zero to one, and C can be approximately converted into a capacitance.Figure 4
Equivalent electrical circuit used to simulate the response of the samples where Rs is the solution resistance, CPE1 is a first constant phase element, R1 is a first resistance, CPE2 is a second constant phase element, and R2 is a second resistance.The results are presented in Table1. Chi-squared (χ2) values were used to evaluate the quality of fitting. The obtained values were in the range of 10−4, indicating the suitability of the circuit.Table 1
Analytical data obtained from the impedance spectroscopy measurements.
Rs (Ω·cm2)
CCPE1 (sn Ω−1·cm−2)
nCPE1
R1 (Ω·cm2)
CCPE1 (sn Ω−1·cm−2)
nCPE2
R2 (Ω·cm2)
χ2 (10−4)
PMMA_G
610
6.7·10−5
0.67
205.3
1.5·10−4
0.70
15270
3.7
PMMA_F_G
3151
3.4·10−6
0.58
13974
6.8·10−6
0.75
418250
4.6Table1 shows that R1 values were always significantly lower than R2. The addition of R1 and R2 (considered as the electron transfer resistance) clearly increased in the foamed sample and the CPE-C values were lower for the foamed sample. The decrease in the capacitance and the increase in the resistance was induced by porosity.Moreover, the impedance behavior indicated that the electron transfer resistance was higher in the foamed sample due to the air trapped into the foam micropores, increasing thus the resistivity [44]. In spite of this, the conductivity was high enough to use the foams as highly porous electrodes where the increase in the porosity and the subsequent higher superficial area can be an advantage.


### 3.3. Sensing Behavior. Detection of Antioxidants

Once the structure and the conductivity were characterized by SEM and EIS, graphite-doped samples were used as working electrodes in an electrochemical cell for the detection of CT and HQ, two of the most interesting antioxidants found in foods and beverages.


#### 3.3.1. Catechol and Hydroquinone Determination

Figures5(a) and 5(b) show the square wave voltammetry (SWV) recorded for increasing catechol concentrations using nonfoamed and foamed sensors. As observed, the foaming process induced important differences in the electrochemical responses. In the case of PMMA_G, low catechol concentrations produced a single redox peak at about +0.35 V (peak 1); as the concentration of catechol increased, a second peak appeared at higher potentials (+0.75 V) (peak 2), which is usually attributed to the dimerization or polymerization of phenols at the electrode surface [45, 46]. In contrast, the response of the foamed PMMA_F_G to catechol was characterized by a single peak centered at around +0.35 V, and polymerization was not observed. The absence of polymerization is an advantage because polymerization is an important cause of electrode fouling.Figure 5
SWV of (a) PMMA_G immersed in CT concentrations from 0 to 2.91 mM; (b) PMMA_F_G immersed in CT concentrations from 0 to 1.67 mM; (c) PMMA_G immersed in HQ concentrations from 0 to 3.15 mM; and (d) PMMA_F_G immersed in HQ concentrations from 0 to 2.68 mM. 0.1 M KCl was used as supporting electrolyte.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)SWVs recorded at increasing hydroquinone concentrations are shown in Figures5(c) and 5(d) for PMMA_G and PMMA_F_G sensors, respectively. In the case of the nonfoamed electrode, two peaks were observed even at low concentrations: the first peak appeared at +0.15 V (peak 1) and the second one appeared at +0.55 V (peak 2). When the concentration increased, a new peak at about +0.75 V was observed as a shoulder. In the voltammograms registered using the foamed PMMA_F_G, the first peak was centered about +0.12 V (peak 1). This time, the polymerization peak was observed at high concentrations (peak 2) and shifted to higher potentials as the concentration increased, reaching a final value of +0.9 V.According to these results, the nonfoamed and the foamed electrodes have different electrochemical behaviors. Thus, the oxidation mechanism for catechol and hydroquinone on both surfaces is different. In addition, foamed electrodes prevent polymerization processes that can cause fouling of the electrodes.Limits of detection (LOD) were calculated from the calibration curves constructed by representing the current intensity of the redox peaks versus catechol or hydroquinone concentrations. It has to be noticed that in some cases, two linear ranges were observed. Table2 shows the linear ranges, the analytical linear calibration curves, the analytical parameters obtained from the curves including the regression coefficients (R2), the residual standard errors (syx), and the LODs calculated form the curves using R-project as the program for statistical computing.Table 2
Analytical data obtained from the calibration curves.
Linear range (mM)
Calibration curves
R2
syx
LOD (mM)
PMMA_G
CT
Peak 1
0.99–2.68
y = 1.00·10−4 + 3.92·10−6x
0.9812
3.20·10−7
0.47
Peak 2
0.50–1.72
y = 6.77·10−5 + 1.99·10−5x
0.9890
1.10·10−6
0.29
Peak 2
1.96–2.91
y = 8.58·10−5 + 9.39·10−6x
0.9906
3.44·10−7
0.53
HQ
Peak 1
1.23–3.15
y = 9.77·10−5 + 8.73·10−7x
0.9786
8.85·10−8
0.62
Peak 2
0.50–2.44
y = 7.86·10−5 + 6.39·10−6x
0.9982
1.85·10−7
0.13
PMMA_F_G
CT
Peak 1
0.15–0.45
y = 2.94·10−6 + 3.44·10−7x
0.9931
3.09·10−9
0.06
Peak 1
0.45–1.67
y = 3.04·10−6 + 1.19·10−7x
0.9921
4.30·10−9
0.17
HQ
Peak 1
0.37–1.11
y = 3.09·10−6 + 1.59·10−7x
0.9941
3.26·10−9
0.12
Peak 2
0.37–2.68
y = 2.95·10−6 + 1.64·10−7x
0.9991
3.55·10−9
0.09According to data listed in Table2, important advantages can be observed in the foamed samples: linear ranges are larger in the foamed sensors, the residual standard errors are smaller, and LODs are lower. For instance, using PMMA_G, limits of detection for CT of 0.47 mM and 0.29 mM were calculated for the first and second oxidation peak, respectively, with a probability of false positive (α) and false negative (β) of 0.05. In contrast, LODs calculated using PMMA_F_G were 0.06 mM and 0.17 mM. This means that LODs are clearly diminished, mainly in the case of the first linear range, where a decrease of one order of magnitude was observed.Similar results were obtained for HQ determination. In this case, the decrease observed in the LODs calculated using peak 1 was more marked than in peak 2, and a LOD of 0.12 mM was attained for the foamed sensor.


#### 3.3.2. Simultaneous Determination of Hydroquinone and Catechol

Hydroquinone and catechol are two isomers and therefore, their oxidation peaks occur at very close potentials. This makes difficult the simultaneous assessment of both compounds. According to the results shown in Figure5, the oxidation peak of CT is around +0.35 V and the oxidation peak for HQ is around +0.15 V. In addition, the degree of polymerization in foamed sensors is smaller. These results point to the possible advantage of PMMA foamed sensors to discriminate between both isomers, allowing the simultaneous assessment of both components.In order to evaluate the capability of our foamed sensors to discriminate between both isomers, voltammograms were registered in solutions containing a fixed concentration of hydroquinone (2 mM) and increasing concentrations of catechol, from 0.26 to 1.92 mM. The response of the PMMA_G sensor immersed in a solution that contains 2 mM of hydroquinone and increasing concentrations of catechol (Figure6(a)) showed a peak at about +0.70 V that was growing progressively with the catechol concentration. This peak could be used to build a robust calibration curve in function of the catechol concentration with a good regression coefficient and low residual standard error (Table 3 collects the regression parameters). The calibration curve showed a linear range, from 0.61 to 1.92 mM. A LOD of 0.34 mM was obtained from the curve with a probability of false positive (α) and false negative (β) of 0.05. Similarly, the response for the PMMA_F_G towards hydroquinone 2 mM and increasing amounts of catechol also showed a peak at +0.25 V that increased linearly with the catechol concentration. In this case, the linear range was larger and ranged from 0.37 to 1.69 mM. Carrying out a robust regression, it was possible to obtain a calibration curve with a good regression coefficient and low residual standard error (Table 3 summarizes the regression parameters). Furthermore, this calibration curve could be used to calculate a limit of detection of 0.27 mM, with a probability of false positive (α) and false negative (β) of 0.05.Figure 6
(a) SWV recorded using PMMA_G for increasing concentrations of catechol from 0.61 to 1.92 mM in the presence of 2 mM hydroquinone in 0.1 M KCl as supporting electrolyte, and (b) comparison for SWV recorded for PMMA_G (red line) and PMMA_F_G (blue line) for 1.92 mM of catechol in the presence of 2 mM hydroquinone in 0.1 M KCl as supporting electrolyte.
(a)
(b)Table 3
Analytical data obtained from the calibration curves of mixtures CT/HQ.
Linear range (mM)
Regression curve
R2
syx
LOD (mM)
PMMA_G
CT
0.61–1.92
y = 9.73·10−5 + 5.38·10−6x
0.9806
3.32·10−7
0.34
PMMA_F_G
CT
0.37–1.69
y = 3.28·10−6 + 7.82·10−8x
0.9804
4.67·10−9
0.27According to these results, both the PMMA_G and the PMMA_G_F sensors can be used to assess catechol in presence of hydroquinone with very close limits of detection. However, foamed sensors show two important advantages. First, the foamed sensor has a larger linear range. But the main advantage is the high electrocatalytic activity of the foamed porous electrode that caused an important shift of the catechol peak from +0.70 V to +0.25 V that can reduce considerably the potential that needs to be applied in the working conditions of amperometry. This electrocatalytic effect has been illustrated in Figure6(b), where the SWV recorded for the same concentration of catechol and hydroquinone (1.92 and 2 mM, resp.) is displayed.


### 3.4. Dynamic Properties

Once the different electrocatalytic properties of PMMA electrodes were established, the dynamic properties were analyzed by registering cyclic voltammograms at increasing scan rates. The dynamic properties for our PMMA_G and PMMA_F_G sensors were characterized in a catechol solution of 10−3 M in 0.1 M KCl as supporting electrolyte from −0.50 V to +1.50 V at scan rates from 0.1 to 0.3 V/s.Representing the current intensity of the reduction peak (at around +0.40 V) versus the square root of the scan rate, a linear relationship was obtained. Data could be adjusted to the Randles-Sevcik equation (2), indicating a quasi-reversible process controlled by diffusion [43] (Table 4).
(2)ip=0.4463·n·F·A·C·nFvDRT1/2Table 4
Dynamic character. Analytical data obtained from the dynamic properties using a solution that contains catechol 10−3 M and KCl 0.1 M as supporting electrolyte.
Regression curve
R2
syx
PMMA_G
CT
y = 4.19·10−5-4.31·10−4x
0.9994
8.20·10−7
PMMA_F_G
CT
y = −2.30·10−6-1.29·10−5x
0.9951
7.17·10−8Whereip is the peak current, n is the electron number transferred in the redox process, F is the Faraday constant, R is the gas constant, T is the temperature, A is the area of the working electrode, C is the concentration for the electroactive species, D is the diffusion coefficient for the electroactive species, and v is the scan rate.As observed in Table4, the slopes of the curves were one order of magnitude lower in the foamed sensor, indicating that kinetics was clearly modified by the presence of pores in the structure and a foamed surface.


## 3.1. Structural Characterization of the Electrodes

In a first step, both the internal and the surface structure of the foamed samples were characterized using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). This information was used to evaluate the influence of the porosity of the samples in the sensing properties of PMMA/graphite composites.Figure2(a) shows the internal structure of the PMMA foam (PMMA_F) where a homogeneous microporous structure with an average pore diameter of 2 μm was observed. The image of the foam surface (Figure 2(b)) showed larger pores with irregular shapes and sizes with an average diameter of 7 μm. When PMMA foam was doped with graphite (PMMA_F_G), the internal porous structure changed. Large pores with 100 μm diameter were accompanied by many small pores with an average diameter of 12 μm (Figure 2(c)). It is also noticeable that the pores were more irregular in shape than those observed in the undoped PMMA_F. This effect can be attributed to the presence of the graphite flakes that modify the foaming process. The surface structure changed drastically in the presence of graphite, and a profusion of small pores of about 4 μm diameter (Figure 2(d)) was observed.Figure 2
SEM images of (a) PMMA_F inner structure, (b) PMMA_F surface structure, (c) PMMA_F_G inner structure, and (d) PMMA_F_G surface structure.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.2. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) Characterization

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used to study the changes in the electrochemical properties of PMMA induced by the insertion of graphite and by the foaming.As expected, the Nyquist plots of nonfoamed PMMA and foamed PMMA_F immersed in 0.1 M KCl showed vertical straight lines, confirming that undoped samples behaved as insulators.When graphite was added to the structure of a PMMA film (PMMA_G) or a PMMA foam (PMMA_F_G), samples became conductive and the Nyquist diagram (Figure3(a)) revealed two unfinished capacitive loops. The semicircle in the high frequency region showed a smaller radius than the large arc observed in the low frequency region. As observed in Figure 3(a), the radii increased in foamed samples. Given that radii of the semicircles are related to the efficiency of the charge transfer, it can be concluded that the electron transfer resistance was higher in the foamed sample. In good accordance, the Bode plots showed that the impedance modulus of the foamed PMMA_F_G was more than one order of magnitude larger than in the nonfoamed PMMA_G (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)).Figure 3
(a) Nyquist and (b) impedance Bode plot and (c) phase Bode plot of PMMA_G film and PMMA_F_G in 0.1 M KCl. Frequency swept from 31,600 Hz to 0.1 Hz at 0 V in a 0.1 M KCl solution.
(a)
(b)
(c)In order to calculate the charge transfer resistance, the impedance values were fitted to the electrical circuit shown in Figure4. In the proposed model, two constant phase elements CPE (representing a nonideal capacitive response of the interface material solution) and two resistances were used. The depression in the Nyquist semicircle and the phase angle of capacitor different from −90° are an indication of this non-pure capacitive behavior. The impedance of a CPE element was defined as:
(1)ZCPE=1Cjωn,where C is a parameter numerically equal to the admittance at ω = 1 rad·s−1, j is the imaginary unit, ω is the frequency, and n is the phase shift. When n=1 the CPE describes an ideal capacitor, when n=0 is an ideal resistor and, when n≈0.5 is a finite-Warburg element accounting for diffusion of mobile charge. In practice, n is in the range of zero to one, and C can be approximately converted into a capacitance.Figure 4
Equivalent electrical circuit used to simulate the response of the samples where Rs is the solution resistance, CPE1 is a first constant phase element, R1 is a first resistance, CPE2 is a second constant phase element, and R2 is a second resistance.The results are presented in Table1. Chi-squared (χ2) values were used to evaluate the quality of fitting. The obtained values were in the range of 10−4, indicating the suitability of the circuit.Table 1
Analytical data obtained from the impedance spectroscopy measurements.
Rs (Ω·cm2)
CCPE1 (sn Ω−1·cm−2)
nCPE1
R1 (Ω·cm2)
CCPE1 (sn Ω−1·cm−2)
nCPE2
R2 (Ω·cm2)
χ2 (10−4)
PMMA_G
610
6.7·10−5
0.67
205.3
1.5·10−4
0.70
15270
3.7
PMMA_F_G
3151
3.4·10−6
0.58
13974
6.8·10−6
0.75
418250
4.6Table1 shows that R1 values were always significantly lower than R2. The addition of R1 and R2 (considered as the electron transfer resistance) clearly increased in the foamed sample and the CPE-C values were lower for the foamed sample. The decrease in the capacitance and the increase in the resistance was induced by porosity.Moreover, the impedance behavior indicated that the electron transfer resistance was higher in the foamed sample due to the air trapped into the foam micropores, increasing thus the resistivity [44]. In spite of this, the conductivity was high enough to use the foams as highly porous electrodes where the increase in the porosity and the subsequent higher superficial area can be an advantage.


## 3.3. Sensing Behavior. Detection of Antioxidants

Once the structure and the conductivity were characterized by SEM and EIS, graphite-doped samples were used as working electrodes in an electrochemical cell for the detection of CT and HQ, two of the most interesting antioxidants found in foods and beverages.


### 3.3.1. Catechol and Hydroquinone Determination

Figures5(a) and 5(b) show the square wave voltammetry (SWV) recorded for increasing catechol concentrations using nonfoamed and foamed sensors. As observed, the foaming process induced important differences in the electrochemical responses. In the case of PMMA_G, low catechol concentrations produced a single redox peak at about +0.35 V (peak 1); as the concentration of catechol increased, a second peak appeared at higher potentials (+0.75 V) (peak 2), which is usually attributed to the dimerization or polymerization of phenols at the electrode surface [45, 46]. In contrast, the response of the foamed PMMA_F_G to catechol was characterized by a single peak centered at around +0.35 V, and polymerization was not observed. The absence of polymerization is an advantage because polymerization is an important cause of electrode fouling.Figure 5
SWV of (a) PMMA_G immersed in CT concentrations from 0 to 2.91 mM; (b) PMMA_F_G immersed in CT concentrations from 0 to 1.67 mM; (c) PMMA_G immersed in HQ concentrations from 0 to 3.15 mM; and (d) PMMA_F_G immersed in HQ concentrations from 0 to 2.68 mM. 0.1 M KCl was used as supporting electrolyte.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)SWVs recorded at increasing hydroquinone concentrations are shown in Figures5(c) and 5(d) for PMMA_G and PMMA_F_G sensors, respectively. In the case of the nonfoamed electrode, two peaks were observed even at low concentrations: the first peak appeared at +0.15 V (peak 1) and the second one appeared at +0.55 V (peak 2). When the concentration increased, a new peak at about +0.75 V was observed as a shoulder. In the voltammograms registered using the foamed PMMA_F_G, the first peak was centered about +0.12 V (peak 1). This time, the polymerization peak was observed at high concentrations (peak 2) and shifted to higher potentials as the concentration increased, reaching a final value of +0.9 V.According to these results, the nonfoamed and the foamed electrodes have different electrochemical behaviors. Thus, the oxidation mechanism for catechol and hydroquinone on both surfaces is different. In addition, foamed electrodes prevent polymerization processes that can cause fouling of the electrodes.Limits of detection (LOD) were calculated from the calibration curves constructed by representing the current intensity of the redox peaks versus catechol or hydroquinone concentrations. It has to be noticed that in some cases, two linear ranges were observed. Table2 shows the linear ranges, the analytical linear calibration curves, the analytical parameters obtained from the curves including the regression coefficients (R2), the residual standard errors (syx), and the LODs calculated form the curves using R-project as the program for statistical computing.Table 2
Analytical data obtained from the calibration curves.
Linear range (mM)
Calibration curves
R2
syx
LOD (mM)
PMMA_G
CT
Peak 1
0.99–2.68
y = 1.00·10−4 + 3.92·10−6x
0.9812
3.20·10−7
0.47
Peak 2
0.50–1.72
y = 6.77·10−5 + 1.99·10−5x
0.9890
1.10·10−6
0.29
Peak 2
1.96–2.91
y = 8.58·10−5 + 9.39·10−6x
0.9906
3.44·10−7
0.53
HQ
Peak 1
1.23–3.15
y = 9.77·10−5 + 8.73·10−7x
0.9786
8.85·10−8
0.62
Peak 2
0.50–2.44
y = 7.86·10−5 + 6.39·10−6x
0.9982
1.85·10−7
0.13
PMMA_F_G
CT
Peak 1
0.15–0.45
y = 2.94·10−6 + 3.44·10−7x
0.9931
3.09·10−9
0.06
Peak 1
0.45–1.67
y = 3.04·10−6 + 1.19·10−7x
0.9921
4.30·10−9
0.17
HQ
Peak 1
0.37–1.11
y = 3.09·10−6 + 1.59·10−7x
0.9941
3.26·10−9
0.12
Peak 2
0.37–2.68
y = 2.95·10−6 + 1.64·10−7x
0.9991
3.55·10−9
0.09According to data listed in Table2, important advantages can be observed in the foamed samples: linear ranges are larger in the foamed sensors, the residual standard errors are smaller, and LODs are lower. For instance, using PMMA_G, limits of detection for CT of 0.47 mM and 0.29 mM were calculated for the first and second oxidation peak, respectively, with a probability of false positive (α) and false negative (β) of 0.05. In contrast, LODs calculated using PMMA_F_G were 0.06 mM and 0.17 mM. This means that LODs are clearly diminished, mainly in the case of the first linear range, where a decrease of one order of magnitude was observed.Similar results were obtained for HQ determination. In this case, the decrease observed in the LODs calculated using peak 1 was more marked than in peak 2, and a LOD of 0.12 mM was attained for the foamed sensor.


### 3.3.2. Simultaneous Determination of Hydroquinone and Catechol

Hydroquinone and catechol are two isomers and therefore, their oxidation peaks occur at very close potentials. This makes difficult the simultaneous assessment of both compounds. According to the results shown in Figure5, the oxidation peak of CT is around +0.35 V and the oxidation peak for HQ is around +0.15 V. In addition, the degree of polymerization in foamed sensors is smaller. These results point to the possible advantage of PMMA foamed sensors to discriminate between both isomers, allowing the simultaneous assessment of both components.In order to evaluate the capability of our foamed sensors to discriminate between both isomers, voltammograms were registered in solutions containing a fixed concentration of hydroquinone (2 mM) and increasing concentrations of catechol, from 0.26 to 1.92 mM. The response of the PMMA_G sensor immersed in a solution that contains 2 mM of hydroquinone and increasing concentrations of catechol (Figure6(a)) showed a peak at about +0.70 V that was growing progressively with the catechol concentration. This peak could be used to build a robust calibration curve in function of the catechol concentration with a good regression coefficient and low residual standard error (Table 3 collects the regression parameters). The calibration curve showed a linear range, from 0.61 to 1.92 mM. A LOD of 0.34 mM was obtained from the curve with a probability of false positive (α) and false negative (β) of 0.05. Similarly, the response for the PMMA_F_G towards hydroquinone 2 mM and increasing amounts of catechol also showed a peak at +0.25 V that increased linearly with the catechol concentration. In this case, the linear range was larger and ranged from 0.37 to 1.69 mM. Carrying out a robust regression, it was possible to obtain a calibration curve with a good regression coefficient and low residual standard error (Table 3 summarizes the regression parameters). Furthermore, this calibration curve could be used to calculate a limit of detection of 0.27 mM, with a probability of false positive (α) and false negative (β) of 0.05.Figure 6
(a) SWV recorded using PMMA_G for increasing concentrations of catechol from 0.61 to 1.92 mM in the presence of 2 mM hydroquinone in 0.1 M KCl as supporting electrolyte, and (b) comparison for SWV recorded for PMMA_G (red line) and PMMA_F_G (blue line) for 1.92 mM of catechol in the presence of 2 mM hydroquinone in 0.1 M KCl as supporting electrolyte.
(a)
(b)Table 3
Analytical data obtained from the calibration curves of mixtures CT/HQ.
Linear range (mM)
Regression curve
R2
syx
LOD (mM)
PMMA_G
CT
0.61–1.92
y = 9.73·10−5 + 5.38·10−6x
0.9806
3.32·10−7
0.34
PMMA_F_G
CT
0.37–1.69
y = 3.28·10−6 + 7.82·10−8x
0.9804
4.67·10−9
0.27According to these results, both the PMMA_G and the PMMA_G_F sensors can be used to assess catechol in presence of hydroquinone with very close limits of detection. However, foamed sensors show two important advantages. First, the foamed sensor has a larger linear range. But the main advantage is the high electrocatalytic activity of the foamed porous electrode that caused an important shift of the catechol peak from +0.70 V to +0.25 V that can reduce considerably the potential that needs to be applied in the working conditions of amperometry. This electrocatalytic effect has been illustrated in Figure6(b), where the SWV recorded for the same concentration of catechol and hydroquinone (1.92 and 2 mM, resp.) is displayed.


## 3.3.1. Catechol and Hydroquinone Determination

Figures5(a) and 5(b) show the square wave voltammetry (SWV) recorded for increasing catechol concentrations using nonfoamed and foamed sensors. As observed, the foaming process induced important differences in the electrochemical responses. In the case of PMMA_G, low catechol concentrations produced a single redox peak at about +0.35 V (peak 1); as the concentration of catechol increased, a second peak appeared at higher potentials (+0.75 V) (peak 2), which is usually attributed to the dimerization or polymerization of phenols at the electrode surface [45, 46]. In contrast, the response of the foamed PMMA_F_G to catechol was characterized by a single peak centered at around +0.35 V, and polymerization was not observed. The absence of polymerization is an advantage because polymerization is an important cause of electrode fouling.Figure 5
SWV of (a) PMMA_G immersed in CT concentrations from 0 to 2.91 mM; (b) PMMA_F_G immersed in CT concentrations from 0 to 1.67 mM; (c) PMMA_G immersed in HQ concentrations from 0 to 3.15 mM; and (d) PMMA_F_G immersed in HQ concentrations from 0 to 2.68 mM. 0.1 M KCl was used as supporting electrolyte.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)SWVs recorded at increasing hydroquinone concentrations are shown in Figures5(c) and 5(d) for PMMA_G and PMMA_F_G sensors, respectively. In the case of the nonfoamed electrode, two peaks were observed even at low concentrations: the first peak appeared at +0.15 V (peak 1) and the second one appeared at +0.55 V (peak 2). When the concentration increased, a new peak at about +0.75 V was observed as a shoulder. In the voltammograms registered using the foamed PMMA_F_G, the first peak was centered about +0.12 V (peak 1). This time, the polymerization peak was observed at high concentrations (peak 2) and shifted to higher potentials as the concentration increased, reaching a final value of +0.9 V.According to these results, the nonfoamed and the foamed electrodes have different electrochemical behaviors. Thus, the oxidation mechanism for catechol and hydroquinone on both surfaces is different. In addition, foamed electrodes prevent polymerization processes that can cause fouling of the electrodes.Limits of detection (LOD) were calculated from the calibration curves constructed by representing the current intensity of the redox peaks versus catechol or hydroquinone concentrations. It has to be noticed that in some cases, two linear ranges were observed. Table2 shows the linear ranges, the analytical linear calibration curves, the analytical parameters obtained from the curves including the regression coefficients (R2), the residual standard errors (syx), and the LODs calculated form the curves using R-project as the program for statistical computing.Table 2
Analytical data obtained from the calibration curves.
Linear range (mM)
Calibration curves
R2
syx
LOD (mM)
PMMA_G
CT
Peak 1
0.99–2.68
y = 1.00·10−4 + 3.92·10−6x
0.9812
3.20·10−7
0.47
Peak 2
0.50–1.72
y = 6.77·10−5 + 1.99·10−5x
0.9890
1.10·10−6
0.29
Peak 2
1.96–2.91
y = 8.58·10−5 + 9.39·10−6x
0.9906
3.44·10−7
0.53
HQ
Peak 1
1.23–3.15
y = 9.77·10−5 + 8.73·10−7x
0.9786
8.85·10−8
0.62
Peak 2
0.50–2.44
y = 7.86·10−5 + 6.39·10−6x
0.9982
1.85·10−7
0.13
PMMA_F_G
CT
Peak 1
0.15–0.45
y = 2.94·10−6 + 3.44·10−7x
0.9931
3.09·10−9
0.06
Peak 1
0.45–1.67
y = 3.04·10−6 + 1.19·10−7x
0.9921
4.30·10−9
0.17
HQ
Peak 1
0.37–1.11
y = 3.09·10−6 + 1.59·10−7x
0.9941
3.26·10−9
0.12
Peak 2
0.37–2.68
y = 2.95·10−6 + 1.64·10−7x
0.9991
3.55·10−9
0.09According to data listed in Table2, important advantages can be observed in the foamed samples: linear ranges are larger in the foamed sensors, the residual standard errors are smaller, and LODs are lower. For instance, using PMMA_G, limits of detection for CT of 0.47 mM and 0.29 mM were calculated for the first and second oxidation peak, respectively, with a probability of false positive (α) and false negative (β) of 0.05. In contrast, LODs calculated using PMMA_F_G were 0.06 mM and 0.17 mM. This means that LODs are clearly diminished, mainly in the case of the first linear range, where a decrease of one order of magnitude was observed.Similar results were obtained for HQ determination. In this case, the decrease observed in the LODs calculated using peak 1 was more marked than in peak 2, and a LOD of 0.12 mM was attained for the foamed sensor.


## 3.3.2. Simultaneous Determination of Hydroquinone and Catechol

Hydroquinone and catechol are two isomers and therefore, their oxidation peaks occur at very close potentials. This makes difficult the simultaneous assessment of both compounds. According to the results shown in Figure5, the oxidation peak of CT is around +0.35 V and the oxidation peak for HQ is around +0.15 V. In addition, the degree of polymerization in foamed sensors is smaller. These results point to the possible advantage of PMMA foamed sensors to discriminate between both isomers, allowing the simultaneous assessment of both components.In order to evaluate the capability of our foamed sensors to discriminate between both isomers, voltammograms were registered in solutions containing a fixed concentration of hydroquinone (2 mM) and increasing concentrations of catechol, from 0.26 to 1.92 mM. The response of the PMMA_G sensor immersed in a solution that contains 2 mM of hydroquinone and increasing concentrations of catechol (Figure6(a)) showed a peak at about +0.70 V that was growing progressively with the catechol concentration. This peak could be used to build a robust calibration curve in function of the catechol concentration with a good regression coefficient and low residual standard error (Table 3 collects the regression parameters). The calibration curve showed a linear range, from 0.61 to 1.92 mM. A LOD of 0.34 mM was obtained from the curve with a probability of false positive (α) and false negative (β) of 0.05. Similarly, the response for the PMMA_F_G towards hydroquinone 2 mM and increasing amounts of catechol also showed a peak at +0.25 V that increased linearly with the catechol concentration. In this case, the linear range was larger and ranged from 0.37 to 1.69 mM. Carrying out a robust regression, it was possible to obtain a calibration curve with a good regression coefficient and low residual standard error (Table 3 summarizes the regression parameters). Furthermore, this calibration curve could be used to calculate a limit of detection of 0.27 mM, with a probability of false positive (α) and false negative (β) of 0.05.Figure 6
(a) SWV recorded using PMMA_G for increasing concentrations of catechol from 0.61 to 1.92 mM in the presence of 2 mM hydroquinone in 0.1 M KCl as supporting electrolyte, and (b) comparison for SWV recorded for PMMA_G (red line) and PMMA_F_G (blue line) for 1.92 mM of catechol in the presence of 2 mM hydroquinone in 0.1 M KCl as supporting electrolyte.
(a)
(b)Table 3
Analytical data obtained from the calibration curves of mixtures CT/HQ.
Linear range (mM)
Regression curve
R2
syx
LOD (mM)
PMMA_G
CT
0.61–1.92
y = 9.73·10−5 + 5.38·10−6x
0.9806
3.32·10−7
0.34
PMMA_F_G
CT
0.37–1.69
y = 3.28·10−6 + 7.82·10−8x
0.9804
4.67·10−9
0.27According to these results, both the PMMA_G and the PMMA_G_F sensors can be used to assess catechol in presence of hydroquinone with very close limits of detection. However, foamed sensors show two important advantages. First, the foamed sensor has a larger linear range. But the main advantage is the high electrocatalytic activity of the foamed porous electrode that caused an important shift of the catechol peak from +0.70 V to +0.25 V that can reduce considerably the potential that needs to be applied in the working conditions of amperometry. This electrocatalytic effect has been illustrated in Figure6(b), where the SWV recorded for the same concentration of catechol and hydroquinone (1.92 and 2 mM, resp.) is displayed.


## 3.4. Dynamic Properties

Once the different electrocatalytic properties of PMMA electrodes were established, the dynamic properties were analyzed by registering cyclic voltammograms at increasing scan rates. The dynamic properties for our PMMA_G and PMMA_F_G sensors were characterized in a catechol solution of 10−3 M in 0.1 M KCl as supporting electrolyte from −0.50 V to +1.50 V at scan rates from 0.1 to 0.3 V/s.Representing the current intensity of the reduction peak (at around +0.40 V) versus the square root of the scan rate, a linear relationship was obtained. Data could be adjusted to the Randles-Sevcik equation (2), indicating a quasi-reversible process controlled by diffusion [43] (Table 4).
(2)ip=0.4463·n·F·A·C·nFvDRT1/2Table 4
Dynamic character. Analytical data obtained from the dynamic properties using a solution that contains catechol 10−3 M and KCl 0.1 M as supporting electrolyte.
Regression curve
R2
syx
PMMA_G
CT
y = 4.19·10−5-4.31·10−4x
0.9994
8.20·10−7
PMMA_F_G
CT
y = −2.30·10−6-1.29·10−5x
0.9951
7.17·10−8Whereip is the peak current, n is the electron number transferred in the redox process, F is the Faraday constant, R is the gas constant, T is the temperature, A is the area of the working electrode, C is the concentration for the electroactive species, D is the diffusion coefficient for the electroactive species, and v is the scan rate.As observed in Table4, the slopes of the curves were one order of magnitude lower in the foamed sensor, indicating that kinetics was clearly modified by the presence of pores in the structure and a foamed surface.


## 4. Conclusions

Catechol (CT), hydroquinone (HQ), and their mixtures have been successfully analyzed at nonenzymatic electrodes based on PMMA doped with graphite. The porous structure of foamed electrodes induced important advantages including reduction of fouling effects, excellent electrocatalytic activity, and decrease in the limits of detection of CT and HQ that were one order of magnitude lower in foamed electrodes. In the case of mixtures, the electrocatalytic effect played an important role and LODs obtained were in the range of 10−4 M. These results confirmed the promising capabilities of foamed polymers as sensitive materials for electrochemical sensors.



---

*Source: 2714752-2018-05-21.xml*