# Studies on the Food and Feeding Habits of Swamp Deer (Rucervus duvaucelii duvaucelii) in Jhilmil Jheel Conservation Reserve, Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India

Authors: R. Tewari; G. S. Rawat
Journal: ISRN Zoology
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Food habits of the swamp deer (Rucervus duvaucelii duvaucelii) were studied in and around Jhilmil Jheel Conservation Reserve (JJCR), Uttarakhand, for two years. This population (320 in number) was recently rediscovered in the state (2005) and warranted an ecological study because the habitat around this study area is heavily fragmented due to expansion of agriculture, habitation, and various other land use practices. Therefore, this study was initiated by the major objective of studying seasonal variation in food habits of swamp deer. Proportionate food consumption was studied using feeding quadrat method. The study reveals that the overall diet of swamp deer consisted mainly of graminoids (grasses and sedges) and herbs (terrestrial and aquatic). In the protected areas studied earlier, the swamp deer habitat was dominated by grasses, and hence they were reported to be predominantly a grazer who occasionally fed on aquatic plants (Schaller 1967 and others). In contrast, at Jhilmil, the area also has equal presence of other plant types namely, sedges and terrestrial herbs. This resulted in polyphagous feeding habit of animal here.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Swamp deer (Rucervus duvaucelii duvaucelii) also known as the Barasingha lives in the swampy grasslands and floodplains of Indian subcontinent [1]. It is currently found in isolated localities in north and central India and southwestern Nepal [2]. It eats mainly grasses and remains close to water all the time [1]. Barasingha is listed as Vulnerable C1 because the estimated population lies between 3,500 and 5,100 animals (not all of which will be mature individuals), and outside several key populations the protection status is not secure. The species range is now highly fragmented, and the total area of occupancy (AOO) possibly falls below 2,000 km². This species is reliant upon hands-on management in protected areas, and changes in management style could see a resumption of very rapid declines echoing those of the mid-twentieth century [3].Studies on the food habits of swamp deer have been carried out in different habitats by a number of researchers. The earliest account available about forage species of swamp deer in Dudhwa was given by Schaller [1]. Later on, Singh [4], Qureshi et al. [5], and Khan and Ahmed [6] also studied the feeding habits of swamp deer in Dudhwa forest. Observations on food habits of barasingha in Kanha were made by Martin [7]. Swamp deer of Nepal were studied by Schaaf [8], Moe [9], Pokharel [10], Bhatta [11], and Wegge et al. [12]. Jhilmil Jheel happens to be the last refuge of swamp deer in western most portion of its distribution range [13]. The present study was undertaken with an aim to identify the plant species consumed by swamp deer and their feeding habits in different seasons.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Study Area

Jhilmil Jheel is a saucer shaped wetland located between Haridwar-Najimabad highway and the River Ganges, in Chidiyapur Range of Haridwar Division, Uttarakhand, covering an area of 37.83 km² of Reserve Forest and elevation ranging from 200 to 250 meters above MSL [14]. The spectacular terai landscape of the study area is a mosaic of short and tall grasslands, tropical mixed moist deciduous forests, and secondary scrub (Figure 1). Throughout the landscape, shifting of river channels over time has left behind many old channels where numerous seasonal and perennial swamps (“tals”) or wetlands occur. The central swamp zone represents one of the above swamps such-oxbow-lake formed along the eastern bank of River Ganges. Surrounding areas get submerged during the monsoon. A number of small rivulets (total 32 in number) emerge from the woodland and discharge into Jhilmil Jheel, which finally drain into the Ganges. Most of them provide water throughout the year, while some dry up for about 6-7 months. The reserve area also receives water from the Shivaliks formations of Chidiyapur and the adjacent ranges such as underground streams, locally called “Choyas.” The area experiences subtropical climate. Annual rainfall averages about 1300 mm (recorded between 1997 and 2007) and is most prominent during June–September (monsoon). Temperature soars up to 44°C in May and drops to 2°C in January. The texture of the soil varies from fine sand to clay loam. The area is rich in faunal and floral diversity, including spotted deer, elephant, blue bull, wild boar, monkey, langur, mongoose, hare, common leopard and occasionally tiger, jungle cat, otter, porcupine, sambar, barking deer, and hog deer that are also seen in the area. The dominant vegetation types include Typha elephantina, Phragmites karka, Imperata cylindrica, Vetiveria zizanioides, Ziziphus mauritiana, and Salix tetrasperma. The local inhabitants of Tantwala Village, adjacent to Jhilmil Jheel, consist of 146 households. They are of different communities, namely, Punjabis, Sainis, Garhwalis, and Gujjars who settled here in the early 1950s. Before the enforcement of Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972, limited wildlife shooting was permitted here. The working plans in the initial 70–80 years of the management history (1896–1973) aimed only at obtaining more revenue out of the forest wealth. Later 1973 onward from there was a shift with the inclusion of wildlife conservation initiatives in the working plans (B.K.P. Sinha plan of 1973–89). On August 5, 2005, the government of Uttarakhand declared the area as a Conservation Reserve. Before this declaration, people (villagers and illegally settled nomads, “gujjars”) were freely grazing their livestock in the grasslands of Jhilmil Jheel area. Later, gujjars were rehabilitated outside Conservation Reserve area (in adjoining forest divisions) along Rawasan River (Figure 1).Figure 1
Location map of Jhilmil Jheel Conservation Reserve. Source: anonymous 2005 [14].


### 2.2. Methods

Sampling sites in different habitats covering moist deciduous, secondary scrub, dry grassland, swamp, and cropland habitats, an area of 6 km2, were selected for the present study. Observation was done on foot. A year-round study was carried out for two years. Three methods were employed for studying food habits: (i) direct observation, (ii) quantification of feeding, and (iii) faecal analysis.


#### 2.2.1. Direct Observation

To study the food habits of swamp deer, a scan sampling method [15] was employed. Observations were made from selected vantage points in the area using a pair of 8 × 40 binoculars and 15 × 45 spotting scope. Since the animals were observed in groups, a scan was taken once in 15 minutes. Study time was for two years and was divided into four-month period corresponding to summer, monsoon, and winter. A total of 100 hours of observation per season were compared. The diurnal cycle was divided into 5 periods: (1) 0700–0900, (2) 0900–1100, (3) 1100–1300, (4) 1300–1500, and (5) 1500–1700 hours. The number of individuals and age-sex composition of groups of swamp deer were also recorded. Individuals in the group were classified into different age and sex classes following Martin [7] with appropriate modifications. Over 250 detections of swamp deer groups were made. Chi-square test was performed to see the variation in frequency distribution of different food plants selected among different age and sex categories and among seasons within categories.


#### 2.2.2. Quantification of Feeding

The feeding sites were examined, after the animal left the location, for plants with fresh feeding signs. Identification of plants in the field was done with the help of floras, research papers, and reports (e.g., [16–21]). Proportionate food consumption was estimated through feeding quadrat method [22, 23]. The plots (1 × 1 m for grass and herbs and 5 × 5 m for shrubs) were laid at random, and the number varied depending upon the size of the area used by the animal at the time of observation. The numbers of food species, the percentage cover of each species, and the phenology of available and utilized species were recorded. The principal food was worked out for grass, herb, and sedge, separately.


#### 2.2.3. Faecal Analysis

The method involves two major steps: first, the preparation of reference material of the food plant species; second, the microhistological examination of faecal material to estimate the frequency of fragments of various plant species [24]. Identification of plant fragments was based on keys given by Satakopan [25] and Johnson et al. [26]. The results were compared with field observations.


## 2.1. Study Area

Jhilmil Jheel is a saucer shaped wetland located between Haridwar-Najimabad highway and the River Ganges, in Chidiyapur Range of Haridwar Division, Uttarakhand, covering an area of 37.83 km² of Reserve Forest and elevation ranging from 200 to 250 meters above MSL [14]. The spectacular terai landscape of the study area is a mosaic of short and tall grasslands, tropical mixed moist deciduous forests, and secondary scrub (Figure 1). Throughout the landscape, shifting of river channels over time has left behind many old channels where numerous seasonal and perennial swamps (“tals”) or wetlands occur. The central swamp zone represents one of the above swamps such-oxbow-lake formed along the eastern bank of River Ganges. Surrounding areas get submerged during the monsoon. A number of small rivulets (total 32 in number) emerge from the woodland and discharge into Jhilmil Jheel, which finally drain into the Ganges. Most of them provide water throughout the year, while some dry up for about 6-7 months. The reserve area also receives water from the Shivaliks formations of Chidiyapur and the adjacent ranges such as underground streams, locally called “Choyas.” The area experiences subtropical climate. Annual rainfall averages about 1300 mm (recorded between 1997 and 2007) and is most prominent during June–September (monsoon). Temperature soars up to 44°C in May and drops to 2°C in January. The texture of the soil varies from fine sand to clay loam. The area is rich in faunal and floral diversity, including spotted deer, elephant, blue bull, wild boar, monkey, langur, mongoose, hare, common leopard and occasionally tiger, jungle cat, otter, porcupine, sambar, barking deer, and hog deer that are also seen in the area. The dominant vegetation types include Typha elephantina, Phragmites karka, Imperata cylindrica, Vetiveria zizanioides, Ziziphus mauritiana, and Salix tetrasperma. The local inhabitants of Tantwala Village, adjacent to Jhilmil Jheel, consist of 146 households. They are of different communities, namely, Punjabis, Sainis, Garhwalis, and Gujjars who settled here in the early 1950s. Before the enforcement of Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972, limited wildlife shooting was permitted here. The working plans in the initial 70–80 years of the management history (1896–1973) aimed only at obtaining more revenue out of the forest wealth. Later 1973 onward from there was a shift with the inclusion of wildlife conservation initiatives in the working plans (B.K.P. Sinha plan of 1973–89). On August 5, 2005, the government of Uttarakhand declared the area as a Conservation Reserve. Before this declaration, people (villagers and illegally settled nomads, “gujjars”) were freely grazing their livestock in the grasslands of Jhilmil Jheel area. Later, gujjars were rehabilitated outside Conservation Reserve area (in adjoining forest divisions) along Rawasan River (Figure 1).Figure 1
Location map of Jhilmil Jheel Conservation Reserve. Source: anonymous 2005 [14].


## 2.2. Methods

Sampling sites in different habitats covering moist deciduous, secondary scrub, dry grassland, swamp, and cropland habitats, an area of 6 km2, were selected for the present study. Observation was done on foot. A year-round study was carried out for two years. Three methods were employed for studying food habits: (i) direct observation, (ii) quantification of feeding, and (iii) faecal analysis.


### 2.2.1. Direct Observation

To study the food habits of swamp deer, a scan sampling method [15] was employed. Observations were made from selected vantage points in the area using a pair of 8 × 40 binoculars and 15 × 45 spotting scope. Since the animals were observed in groups, a scan was taken once in 15 minutes. Study time was for two years and was divided into four-month period corresponding to summer, monsoon, and winter. A total of 100 hours of observation per season were compared. The diurnal cycle was divided into 5 periods: (1) 0700–0900, (2) 0900–1100, (3) 1100–1300, (4) 1300–1500, and (5) 1500–1700 hours. The number of individuals and age-sex composition of groups of swamp deer were also recorded. Individuals in the group were classified into different age and sex classes following Martin [7] with appropriate modifications. Over 250 detections of swamp deer groups were made. Chi-square test was performed to see the variation in frequency distribution of different food plants selected among different age and sex categories and among seasons within categories.


### 2.2.2. Quantification of Feeding

The feeding sites were examined, after the animal left the location, for plants with fresh feeding signs. Identification of plants in the field was done with the help of floras, research papers, and reports (e.g., [16–21]). Proportionate food consumption was estimated through feeding quadrat method [22, 23]. The plots (1 × 1 m for grass and herbs and 5 × 5 m for shrubs) were laid at random, and the number varied depending upon the size of the area used by the animal at the time of observation. The numbers of food species, the percentage cover of each species, and the phenology of available and utilized species were recorded. The principal food was worked out for grass, herb, and sedge, separately.


### 2.2.3. Faecal Analysis

The method involves two major steps: first, the preparation of reference material of the food plant species; second, the microhistological examination of faecal material to estimate the frequency of fragments of various plant species [24]. Identification of plant fragments was based on keys given by Satakopan [25] and Johnson et al. [26]. The results were compared with field observations.


## 2.2.1. Direct Observation

To study the food habits of swamp deer, a scan sampling method [15] was employed. Observations were made from selected vantage points in the area using a pair of 8 × 40 binoculars and 15 × 45 spotting scope. Since the animals were observed in groups, a scan was taken once in 15 minutes. Study time was for two years and was divided into four-month period corresponding to summer, monsoon, and winter. A total of 100 hours of observation per season were compared. The diurnal cycle was divided into 5 periods: (1) 0700–0900, (2) 0900–1100, (3) 1100–1300, (4) 1300–1500, and (5) 1500–1700 hours. The number of individuals and age-sex composition of groups of swamp deer were also recorded. Individuals in the group were classified into different age and sex classes following Martin [7] with appropriate modifications. Over 250 detections of swamp deer groups were made. Chi-square test was performed to see the variation in frequency distribution of different food plants selected among different age and sex categories and among seasons within categories.


## 2.2.2. Quantification of Feeding

The feeding sites were examined, after the animal left the location, for plants with fresh feeding signs. Identification of plants in the field was done with the help of floras, research papers, and reports (e.g., [16–21]). Proportionate food consumption was estimated through feeding quadrat method [22, 23]. The plots (1 × 1 m for grass and herbs and 5 × 5 m for shrubs) were laid at random, and the number varied depending upon the size of the area used by the animal at the time of observation. The numbers of food species, the percentage cover of each species, and the phenology of available and utilized species were recorded. The principal food was worked out for grass, herb, and sedge, separately.


## 2.2.3. Faecal Analysis

The method involves two major steps: first, the preparation of reference material of the food plant species; second, the microhistological examination of faecal material to estimate the frequency of fragments of various plant species [24]. Identification of plant fragments was based on keys given by Satakopan [25] and Johnson et al. [26]. The results were compared with field observations.


## 3.  Results

Age and sex categories as a whole and across seasons showed no significant variation in feeding habits. Yearling and fawn showed significant differences in feeding habits across seasons (χ² = 14.646, P=0.023 and χ²= 1.190, P=0.551, resp.). Swamp deer in Jhilmil was observed to feed on 42 species of plants belonging to 15 families. More than 75% of the food species were of the families Poaceae (16 species), Cyperaceae (5 species), Fabaceae (5 species), Asteraceae (4 species), and Typhaceae (2 species) (Table 1, Figure 2). Aerial parts, chiefly comprising leaves, were fed. Root stock of Typhaspp. was fed throughout monsoon, while its fresh sprout was fed in winter and new leaves in summer. Percentage contribution of the food types, namely, grasses, aquatic flora, sedges, and herbs, to the overall diet and in individual seasons is presented in Figure 3. A lesser number of food plant species were identified by faecal analysis, when compared to the direct observations. The reason was that monocot faecal fragments could not be differentiated to species level that’s why named as similar species. While 13 plant species were identified from faecal fragments in summer, 8 in monsoon and 12 in winter.Table 1
The principal food plant species, in which habitat it occurs, and major categories of food plants of swamp deer in Jhilmil Jheel Conservation Reserve.
Food plant species
Family
Type of food plant
Habitat category
Coix lachryma-jobi
Poaceae
Grass
Swamp
Cynodon dactylon
Poaceae
Grass
Dry grassland
Cyrtococcum accrescens
Poaceae
Grass
Swamp
Echinochloa colona
Poaceae
Grass
Cropland
Imperata cylindrica
Poaceae
Grass
Dry grassland
Oplismenus compositus
Poaceae
Grass
Moist deciduous forest
Oryza sativa
Poaceae
Grass
Cropland
Paspalidium flavidum
Poaceae
Grass
Moist deciduous forest
Paspalum conjugatum
Poaceae
Grass
Cropland
Paspalum scrobiculatum
Poaceae
Grass
Swamp
Phragmites karka
Poaceae
Grass
Swamp
Polypogon fugax
Poaceae
Grass
Cropland
Saccharum officinarum
Poaceae
Grass
Cropland
Saccharum spontaneum
Poaceae
Grass
Secondary scrub
Setaria glauca
Poaceae
Grass
Dry grassland
Vetiveria zizanioides
Poaceae
Grass
Dry grassland
Carex myosurus
Cyperaceae
Sedge
Swamp
Cyperus brevifolius
Cyperaceae
Sedge
Swamp
Cyperus cyperoides
Cyperaceae
Sedge
Swamp
Fimbristylis dichotoma
Cyperaceae
Sedge
Swamp
Fimbristylis miliacea
Cyperaceae
Sedge
Swamp
Desmodium triflorum
Fabaceae
Herb
Secondary scrub
Medicago lupulina
Fabaceae
Herb
Secondary scrub
Melilotus indica
Fabaceae
Herb
Cropland
Trifolium alexandrinum
Fabaceae
Herb
Cropland
Trifolium tomentosum
Fabaceae
Herb
Cropland
Blainvillea acmella
Asteraceae
Herb
Swamp
Parthenium hysterophorus
Asteraceae
Herb
Moist deciduous forest
Silybum marianum
Asteraceae
Herb
Moist deciduous forest
Xanthium strumarium
Asteraceae
Herb
Swamp
Typha angustifolia
Typhaceae
Aquatic flora
Swamp
Typha elephantina
Typhaceae
Aquatic flora
SwampFigure 2
Percentage relationships among the principal families of the food species of swamp deer in JJCR.Figure 3
Percentage contribution of the food types to the overall diet of swamp deer and their seasonal ranking.


## 4. Discussion

The variation in feeding habits of yearling and fawn categories across seasons was probably an outcome of low sampling intensity (fewer sightings). We have observed that swamp deer have proportionally more of grasses and aquatic plants in their diet. These observations are in agreement with the reports of Schaller 1967, Martin 1977, Schaff 1978, Singh 1984, Moe 1994, Qureshi et al. 1995, Pokharel 1996, Khan et al. 2004, and Bhatta 2004 who reported that swamp deer is primarily a grazer who largely fed on grasses and aquatic plants. In contrast, a study on dry-season diet of swamp deer in Nepal [12] showed that swamp deer diet had a proportion of woody plants as well (12.5%). However, dominance of forage species and its distribution pattern in a certain locality have a great deal to do with its proportionate consumption [7]. At Jhilmil, the area also has equal presence of other plant types, namely, sedges and terrestrial herbs. This resulted in polyphagous feeding habit of the animals there (Table 2). Higher consumption for a particular food type showed seasonal variation. Swamp deer (mixed feeders though) commonly concentrated on grasses during high-rainfall periods and high rate of grass growth. The proportion of terrestrial and aquatic herbs in diet increased gradually in winter and summer.Table 2
Food plants of swamp deer reported in previous and present study.
Present study
Schaller 1967 [1],Qureshi et al. 2004 [2]
Singh 1984 [4]
Khan andAhmed 2004 [6]
Martin 1977 [7]
Schaaf 1978 [8],Moe 1994 [9],Pokharel 1996 [10],Bhatta 2004 [11]
Wegge et al. 2006 [12]
Typha spp.
Hydrilla spp.
Arundo donax
I. cylindrica
Grasses
Brachiaria spp.
A.  donax
Grasses
Hygroryza spp.
I. cylindrica
Corchorus  capsularis
Colebrookia oppositifolia
Sedges
Imperata cylindrica
N. porphyrocoma
Cynodon  dactylon
Cymbopogon spp.
Narenga porphyrocoma
S. spontaneum
Cyperus  rotundus
Dalbergia  sissoo
Oryza  rufipogon
Themeda spp.
Desmostachya bipinnata
I. cylindrica
Phragmites  karka
Ziziphus  mauritiana
Grewia sapida
N. porphyrocoma
Saccharum spontaneum
I. cylindrica
P. karka
P. karka
Phoenix humilis
Saccharum munja
S.spontaneum
S. spontaneum
Themeda spp.
Vetiveria zizanoides
Z. mauritianaSwamp deer showed shifts in their diet to specific part (root stock) ofTyphaspp. in monsoon for physiological requirement. This is presumed to be a way to supplement calcium intake [27]. In summer, there is an equal choice for both new leaves of Typhaspp. and sedges. This can be attributed to their almost equal availability and palatability. In this study site, the overall principal diet of swamp deer consists of Typha spp. in contrast to Imperata cylindrica reported by all the authors in past. The reason is Typha’s availability (in prime swamp deer habitat) and proportion area covered in comparison to those of Imperata grasslands.


## 5.  Conclusion

The swamp deer is a mixed feeder, consuming a wide variety of food types, and diet composition may vary according to season and food availability. They are selective only in monsoon, the time of abundant food supply, and are nonselective or opportunistic feeders in summer when food is limited. Long-term survival and conservation of herbivores depend on the availability of suitable habitats; hence, protection of the plant species utilized by herbivores is a significant factor in conservation biology.



---

*Source: 278213-2013-08-24.xml*