# Enhanced Ciprofloxacin Removal from Aqueous Solution Using a Chemically Modified Biochar Derived from Bamboo Sawdust: Adsorption Process Optimization with Response Surface Methodology

Authors: Wondimu K. Wakejo; Beteley T. Meshasha; Joon W. Kang; Yonas Chebude
Journal: Adsorption Science & Technology
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Contamination of water by ciprofloxacin has become a significant concern due to its adverse health effects and growing evidence of antimicrobial-resistant gene evolution. To this end, a chemically modified bamboo biochar was prepared from bamboo sawdust to effectively remove ciprofloxacin (CIP) from an aqueous solution. Under similar adsorption conditions, the modified bamboo biochar (MBC) has an excellent CIP removal efficiency (96%) compared to unmodified bamboo biochar (UBC) efficiency (45%). Thus, MBC was used in batch adsorption experiments, and the process was optimized with the central composite design (CCD) framework of response surface methodology (RSM). Sorption process parameters such as initial CIP concentration, pH, adsorbent dose, and contact time were studied and found to have a significant effect on CIP removal. The optimal CIP removal (96%) was obtained at MBC dose (0.5 g L-1), CIP initial concentration (20 mg L-1), pH (7.5), and contact time (46 min). The adsorption kinetic data were well described by the pseudo-second-order model (R2=0.999), and both Langmuir (R2=0.994) and Freundlich (R2=0.972) models gave the best fit in CIP adsorption isotherm analysis. The maximum monolayer adsorption capacity of the MBC was 78.43 mg g-1 based on the Langmuir isotherm model. These results suggest that CIP adsorption was mainly controlled by chemisorption. Moreover, the CIP adsorption process was endothermic and spontaneous. Overall, MBC is a low-cost, efficient, and recyclable adsorbent for eliminating emerging contaminants such as ciprofloxacin from an aqueous solution.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Emerging water contaminants such as pharmaceuticals have recently gained considerable research attention [1]. Among pharmaceuticals, antibiotics are the most widely consumed pharmaceutical drugs [2] that pollute water bodies. There are different classes of antibiotics based on their mechanism of action, chemical structure, action spectrum, and route of administration [3]. The most common classification of antibiotics is based on their mode of action, which includes fluoroquinolones, quinolones, β-lactams, sulfonamides, monobactams, carbapenems, and aminoglycosides. Quinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin) are broad-spectrum antibiotics that are widely prescribed [3]. More importantly, CIP stands in the first place based on the number of antibiotics prescribed in this group [4]. Ciprofloxacin (CIP), a second-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic, was developed by a German businessman in 1983. It has a fluorine atom at position 6 in the quinolone group to target most gram-negative and some gram-positive bacteria [5]. CIP prevents the replication of bacteria and ultimately inhibits their proliferation [6]. Due to its wide consumption as a broad-spectrum drug [3], incomplete metabolism (15-20%) in humans and animals [4, 7], higher environmental concentration (up to 20,321 ng L-1), and frequent detection in the environment [3, 4, 8], CIP has become one of the top priority water contaminants that needs research intervention. It has been released into the environment and detected in groundwater, surface water, and wastewater treatment plant effluents [9]. Antibiotic pollution of ecosystems can pose serious health risks to humans due to their high toxicity and carcinogenic properties [10]. Contamination of drinking water supplies with CIP, in particular, can result in serious health effects such as thrombocytopenia, acute renal failure, eosinophilia, elevation of liver enzymes, and leucopenia [11]. Albeit low concentration, CIP can promote and accelerate the growth of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) genes in water [5]. Therefore, the removal of CIP from an aqueous environment has become an urgent issue [8].Conventional wastewater treatment methods are unable to sufficiently remove CIP from water, owing to CIP’s biodegradation resistance [12, 13]. In response to this problem, removal mechanisms such as ozonation [14], catalytic oxidation [15], photocatalytic degradation of CIP with hematite (Fe2O3) nanoparticles [16], electro-Fenton [17], electrocoagulation [18], magnetic nanomaterials [19], reverse osmosis [20], solar photo-oxidation [21], and adsorption [13, 20, 22] have been explored for the removal of CIP from water. Among the advanced oxidation processes mentioned above, solar photo-oxidation is recently considered a promising way of degrading recalcitrant pollutants in industrial wastewater. Solar energy-based water treatment processes are regarded as a sustainable way of pollutant remediation with promising potential [21]. Recently, photocatalytic degradation has been employed for the removal of recalcitrant water contaminants such as norfloxacin [23], ampicillin [24], and methylene blue dye [25] and showed promising efficiency. However, most of the treatment methods cited above have the issue of efficiency, high energy requirement, generation of toxic by-products, and high treatment cost [1, 26]. Therefore, efficient and low-cost treatment options that do not introduce harmful by-products are required to eliminate antibiotics from water [27]. In this regard, adsorption is a promising method that achieves these noted benefits; plus, it can be implemented without difficulty [26, 28–30].Various adsorbents such as montmorillonite [31], clinoptilolite [32], metal-organic framework [33], graphene hydrogel [34], activated bentonite [35], iron oxide nanoparticle [36], titanate nanotubes [28], silica xerogels [29], nanocomposite [37], chitosan [38], and biochar [8, 39, 40] have been applied for CIP removal. Magnetic nanoparticles such as magnetic core-shell MnFe2O4@TiO2 nanoparticles [19], humic acid, and levulinic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles are efficient in removing CIP from water [41]. Other non-magnetic nanoparticles such as graphene oxide nanoparticles were also reported to be efficient for the removal of antidiabetic pharmaceutical (metformin) from an aqueous solution [42]. However, most of these adsorbents are associated with complicated preparation techniques, sustainability problems, low CIP uptake [22], availability, and higher preparation cost. Despite the promising potential of nanoadsorbents, issues related to separation challenges from aqueous solutions and the associated secondary pollution limited their large-scale applications. As a result, the quest for more cost-effective and efficient adsorbents is ongoing [22]. Among the adsorbents proposed for CIP removal, biochar has several advantages because of its sustainability, low-cost, feedstock availability, and easy separation from aqueous solution [43]. On the other hand, transforming low-value biomass waste material into value-added materials such as biochar is an example of promoting the circular economy [44].The type and availability of functional groups on the surface of biochar play a critical role in removing pollutants [45]. The high surface area, high mineral content, and sufficient oxygen-containing groups of biochar tend to favor the adsorption of water contaminants [43]. Most importantly, chemical modification techniques can easily improve the surface of the biochar. Osman et al. [46] reported surface areas of 1368 m2 g-1 and 1142 m2 g-1 after one-step (H3PO4) and two-step (H3PO4+KOH) chemical activation of herbaceous lignocellulosic biomass with a surface area of 17 m2 g-1 before activation.The adsorptive capacity of the biochar can be enhanced by employing different methods such as chemical modification, physical modification, impregnating with mineral sorbents, and magnetic modification. These modifications can alter the physicochemical and surface nature of biochars. Compared with physical modification, chemical activation enhances the surface area due to the shorter activation time and lower activation energy of functionalized porous carbons in the presence of an alkaline activation agent [43]. Generally, chemical modification of biochar is done via the addition of acids or bases to alter the surface functional properties of the biochar before or after carbonation. Acid activation results in surface acidities and modification of the porous structure of biochar. More often, phosphoric (H3PO4), sulphuric (H2SO4), nitric (HNO3), and hydrochloric (HCl) acids [47] are used for acid activation, which yielded improved adsorption capacity. Biochar modified by H2SO4, KOH, and methanol has shown enhanced tetracycline (TC) removal through π-π EDA interactions because of the functional groups on its surface [47]. Alternatively, impregnation with FeCl3, Fe2O3, Fe (NO3)3, and MgCl2 is performed by soaking biochars or their feedstock in metal nitrates or chlorides solution [47].Adsorbent preparation using iron salts has the advantages of inducing magnetic properties to the adsorbent for easy separation and enhancing the sorption capacity of the adsorbent by providing additional sorption sites for the removal of the contaminants [48–51]. It has been reported that magnetic biochar has demonstrated higher sorption capability for organic pollutants removal compared to non-magnetic biochar [48]. The higher adsorptive capacity of a magnetic sorbent is probably due to the involvement of Fe-O in the adsorption process [52]. On the other hand, the alkaline modification of biochar may change the biochar’s physical/chemical properties (surface area, pore size, and types of functional groups). Li et al. [53] reported that the KOH-treated biochar possessed more mesopores than the raw biochar and showed higher adsorptive performance than the raw biochar [53]. Until now, amine-functionalized bamboo biochar [54], bamboo biochar modified with H3PO4 and K2CO3 [55], and co-pyrolysis bamboo and sewage sludge char [56] have been investigated for CIP adsorption. However, most of these modification processes involve multi-step processes for biochar preparation. As a result, a simple protocol for producing biochar with a high adsorptive capacity can provide a viable alternative for CIP removal from water. To the best of our knowledge, simultaneous treatment of bamboo sawdust with FeCl3 and KOH for CIP removal from water has not been reported yet.Bamboo is a plentiful and fast-growing renewable woody plant used in construction and furniture applications. During the technological processing of bamboo for various applications, a considerable amount of bamboo sawdust is generated. Also, it is reported that bamboo waste (BW) has high organic matter content [56]. Due to its low-cost and availability, this study considered bamboo sawdust for CIP adsorbent preparation. This study investigated the potential of modified bamboo biochar for CIP removal from aqueous solutions using batch adsorption experiments. The CIP adsorption process parameters such as initial CIP concentration, pH, contact time, and adsorbent dosage were optimized employing response surface methodology (CCD experimental design). Adsorption kinetics, isotherm, and thermodynamic studies were conducted to describe the removal mechanism and nature of CIP adsorption with modified bamboo biochar. Furthermore, an adsorbent reuse and recycle test was conducted for five consecutive CIP adsorption-desorption cycles.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Chemical and Materials

The bamboo sawdust was collected from the local areas where bamboo is processed for furniture applications. All chemicals (FeCl3.6H2O, KOH, HCl, NaOH, and NaCl) used in this study were purchased from Rankem chemical supplier, Ethiopia. The analytical standard for ciprofloxacin hydrochloride (CIP) with purity >99.7% was obtained from Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. All chemicals used in this study were analytical grade and used without further purification.


### 2.2. Adsorbent Preparation

The collected bamboo sawdust was washed to remove any dirt bound to the biomass and dried overnight at 120°C. Afterward, it was grounded to a particle size less than 850μm. Bamboo sawdust was chemically modified with ferric chloride and potassium hydroxide at the same time, employing a 5 : 1 w/w ratio of bamboo sawdust to FeCl3.6H2O and a 1 : 5 w/v ratio of bamboo sawdust to KOH (1 M). The chemical modification was carried out at 80°C and 600 rpm for 2 hrs. The mixture was then dried at 60°C in a vacuum oven for 24 hrs. The dried and chemically treated bamboo sawdust was ground to a particle size of less than 450 μm before being carbonized at 700°C for 1 hr at a heating ramp rate of 10°C/min in an oxygen-limited carbolite furnace. The carbonized bamboo (bamboo biochar) was then washed with ultrapure water until the filtrate pH became 7 and dried at 120°C overnight to get modified bamboo biochar (MBC). The MBC was then ground to a particle size less than 150 μm and stored in air-tight polyethylene bags for further use. Moreover, unmodified bamboo biochar (UBC), bamboo treated solely with ferric chloride (FMBC), and bamboo treated with only potassium hydroxide (KMBC) were also prepared via a similar synthesis route to investigate the effect of chemical modification and individual chemical modifications.


### 2.3. Adsorbent Characterization

The structure and crystal phase of the modified (MBC) and unmodified bamboo biochar (UBC) were analyzed by conducting the X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD; Rigaku MiniFlex 600 Benchtop). In XRD analysis, Cu Kα radiation was applied to generate X-rays at 1.54441 Å wavelength employing the following operational conditions, 40 kV and 15 mA, and angle scanning (2θ) ranging from 10° to 60°. Moreover, the presence of functional groups was identified by Spectrum 65 PerkinElmer-FTIR in the range of 4000-400 cm-1 (resolution: 4 cm-1, no. of scans: 16) using KBr pellets. In addition, the specific surface areas of the biochars were analyzed with nitrogen adsorption-desorption at 77°K using SA-9600 Series Surface Area Analyzer (Horiba Instruments, Inc.). The samples were degassed at 100°C for 2 hrs before analysis. The specific surface area was determined by the multipoint BET method in the N2 relative pressure (P/P0) range of 0.05–0.30.


#### 2.3.1. Determination ofpHpzc

The point of zero charge (pHpzc) is one of the vital material characterization parameters that describes the net surface charge of adsorbents as a function of solution pH [26, 57]. The point of zero charge (pHpzc) of MBC was conducted according to the method used in the previous studies [26, 57, 58]. In this study, pHpzc was determined using eight Erlenmeyer flasks filled with 50 mL CIP solution (20 mg L-1). Initially, the pH values of the solutions were adjusted to 2–11 using 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH. Following that, 0.1 g of the MBC was added to each flask and shaken at 200 rpm for 24 hrs. The final pH values of the solutions were then measured. The variations between final and initial pH values were recorded (y-axis) and plotted against the initial pH values (x-axis). The initial pH value at which y-axis = 0 denotes the point of zero charge (pHpzc) value.


### 2.4. Adsorption Experiments

A preliminary batch adsorption study was undertaken to investigate the CIP removal efficiencies of UBC, MBC, FMBC, and KMBC. Based on the preliminary study, MBC showed superior performance on CIP removal and was chosen for further adsorption study. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted in a water bath shaker under controlled temperature and shaking speed. A stock solution of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride monohydrate (1 g L-1) was prepared by dissolving 1000 mg of ciprofloxacin in one-litre ultrapure water. The adsorption equilibrium time was determined at pH=7.0, CIP initial concentration of 20 mg L-1, and adsorbent dosage of 0.5 g L-1 considering contact time of 10, 30, 50, 70, 90, 110, and 130 minutes. To obtain an optimal operational condition, adsorption process parameters such as CIP initial concentration (5–50 mg L-1), pH=2−12, contact time (5–60 min), and adsorbents dose (0.25–1.25 g L-1) were studied. These parameter ranges were selected based on adsorption experiments (equilibrium study, point of zero charges, and preliminary test) as well as commonly reported operational conditions for CIP removal in the literature. The pH of the CIP solution was adjusted using 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH. All adsorption studies were carried out in a 100 mL conical flask using a water shaker bath at 200 rpm and 25°C. The temperature was varied from 25 to 45°C for the thermodynamic study. Before CIP analysis, the adsorption solution was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 minutes and filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter. Adsorption experiments of kinetics, isotherms, and thermodynamics were carried out in triplicate. Equations (1) and (2) were used to compute CIP removal efficiency and adsorption capacity, respectively [5].
(1)Removal%=Co−CtCo×100.The adsorption capacity was obtained from the following equation:(2)qt=Co−CtVM,where C0, Ct, V, and M are the initial CIP concentration (mg L-1), ciprofloxacin concentration (mg L-1) at a given time t (min), volume of the solution (L), and mass of the adsorbent (g), respectively.


### 2.5. Ciprofloxacin Analysis

Ciprofloxacin concentration was analyzed using a spectrophotometer (UV1610, China) at 274.8 nm. The calibration curve was plotted using seven standard ciprofloxacin solutions: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 mg L-1, as well as a blank. The obtained standard calibration (R2=0.998) curve is expressed in
(3)Y=0.09117X+0.02133,where Y is CIP concentration (mg L-1) and X is the UV–vis spectrophotometer absorbance reading of the solution at 274.8 nm wavelength.


### 2.6. Adsorbent Regeneration

Adsorbent reusability is one of the most important economic parameters of the adsorption systems in water and wastewater treatment applications [10]. Therefore, in this study, the reusability of MBC was examined for five consecutive CIP adsorption-desorption cycles at an optimal operating conditions (pH=7.5, CIP concentration=20 mg L-1, MBC dose=0.5 g L-1, time=120 min, shaking speed=200 rpm, and temperature=25°C) obtained in the previous steps. CIP desorption optimization experiments were conducted using 0.3 M NaOH, 0.3 M HCl, methanol, and 3% NaOH+methanol to get the best desorbing solution for the CIP. These solutions were employed in the previous studies as eluents for CIP desorption from various adsorbents. The MBC reusability test was then conducted using the best desorbing solution. After each cycle, MBC was thoroughly washed with ultrapure water, filtered and dried up in an oven, and then reused in the next adsorption cycle. The adsorption efficiency of MBC after each cycle was calculated using Equation (1).


### 2.7. Design of Experiments Using a Central Composite Design

Central composite design (CCD) is one of the frameworks of response surface methodology (RSM) often employed to statistically analyze experimental data. Design expert software (trial version: 11.0) was used to evaluate all parameters and experimental data. In this approach, responses are affected by various process variables. Main process variables such as pH, adsorbent dose, contact time, and CIP concentration were combined to give 30 experiments for CIP removal from an aqueous solution. An equilibrium time study and determination of the point of zero charges of MBC were conducted before developing the CCD experimental design. Thus, the selection of levels of pH and contact time was based on the data obtained from these studies and the review of the previous studies. Levels of other parameters such as initial CIP concentration and adsorbent dose were based on the CIP adsorption preliminary study and commonly reported values in previous studies. Table1 shows the independent variable ranges and their coded values. CIP has pKa values of 6.1 and 8.7. In this regard, the pH values of low (5.25), central (7.5), and high (9.75) were selected to include the pH level less than 6.1, greater than 8.7, and 6.1-8.7. Low contact time (18.75 min) and high (46.25 min) were selected after conducting the equilibrium time study. Contact time values below the equilibrium time (70 min) were selected to analyze the effect of contact time on CIP adsorption. The relationship between the coded and real (uncoded) values is presented in [59]
(4)xi=Xi−X0ΔX,where xi stands for the dimensionless coded value of the ith independent variable, Xi is the actual value of the independent variable, X0 is the central point actual value, and ∆X is the step change value of the variable.Table 1
The independent variables and their levels in the CCD experimental design.
FactorsLevelsStar pointsActualCodedLow (-1)Central (0)High (+)-α+αCIP initial concentration (mg L-1)A2030401050Adsorbent dosage (g L-1)B0.50.751.000.1251.25pHC5.257.59.75312Contact time (min)D18.7530.0046.25560In this regard, RSM was used to derive a quadratic polynomial model for expressing the effects of the independent variables on the response. The quadratic equation of the optimal model was given by [59]
(5)Y=βo+∑i=1n=4βiXi+∑i=04∑j=14βijXiXj+∑i=14βiiXj2+ε,where Y is the model predicted response, β0 is the coefficient of the model (constant), Xi (i=1to4) represents the independent variables, and βi, βii, and βij (iandj=1–4) indicate the linear, quadratic, and second-order interaction coefficients, and ε is the corresponding error. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to statistically assess the potential of the developed polynomial model in predicting the experimental results.


### 2.8. Adsorption Kinetic Study

The time profile data of CIP adsorption onto the modified biochar were analyzed using four kinetic models commonly used in solid-liquid adsorption processes: the pseudo-first-order equation, the pseudo-second-order equation, Elovich, and intraparticle kinetic models as written in Equations (6)–(9), respectively [60]. Adsorption kinetics was studied using the optimum parameters obtained in the RSM optimization step.
(6)lnqe−qt=lnqe−K1t,(7)tqt=1K22qe2+tqe,(8)qt=1βlnαβ+1βlnt,(9)qt=Kidt1/2+K0,where qe and qt are the amounts of CIP (mg g-1) adsorbed per unit mass of MBC at equilibrium and at a time t, respectively; K1, K2, and Kid are the pseudo-first-order (min-1), pseudo-second-order (g mg-1min-1), and intraparticle mg (g min0.5)-1 rate constants, respectively; α (mg g−1min−1) indicates the initial adsorption rate; β (g mg−1) represents the activation energy rate change with surface coverage; and Ko represents the thickness of the boundary layer.


### 2.9. Adsorption Isotherm Study

The adsorption performance of the CIP isotherm model is essential for investigating the interactions between CIP and biochar (MBC) during the adsorption process [1]. This study considered four isotherm models: Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) to evaluate the equilibrium CIP adsorption isotherm data expressed in Equations (10)–(13), respectively. The isotherm study was conducted using optimum operating conditions obtained from the CCD experimental design.
(10)Ceqe=1qmb+Ceqm,(11)lnqe=lnKF+lnCen,(12)qe=βlnKT+βlnCe,(13)lnqe=lnqm−Kε2,where Ce is the equilibrium concentration of the CIP in solution (mg L-1), qe is the adsorption capacity at equilibrium (mg g-1), b (L mg-1) is the Langmuir constant, and qm (mg g-1) is the maximum adsorption capacity. The maximum monolayer adsorption capacity (qm) and b were obtained from the slope and intercept of Ce versus Ce/qe plot. KF (mg g-1) denotes the Freundlich isotherm constant. Freundlich intensity parameter (n) indicates existing adsorption driving forces and heterogeneity degree of the surface. The Temkin model constants, β, and KT (L mg-1) are related to the heat of adsorption and maximum binding energy, respectively. In the D-R model, K stands for adsorption energy constant, qm represents the theoretical saturation capacity (mg g-1), and ε is the Polanyi potential, calculated from Equation (14). Based on the Langmuir equation, an essential parameter of adsorption (RL) is expressed in
(14)RL=11+bC0,where C0 (mg L-1) and b (L mg-1) are initial CIP concentration and Langmuir constant, respectively. The calculated value of RL can characterize the type of the isotherm and its nature: (i) irreversible isotherm (RL=0), (ii) favorable isotherm (0<RL<1), (iii) linear isotherm (RL=1), and unfavorable isotherm (RL>1) [8, 61]. The above D-R model can be evaluated using
(15)ε=RTln1+1Ce.The constantK is expressed by the slope of the plot of lnqe vs. ε2, and the adsorption capacity, qm (mg g-1), can be obtained from the intercept.


### 2.10. Adsorption Thermodynamic Study

The thermodynamic study was conducted using 25, 35, and 45°C at a shaking speed of 200 rpm. Optimum CIP adsorption conditions obtained in the CCD design were employed to conduct the thermodynamic study. There are three essential parameters for thermodynamic study, namely, Gibbs free energy change (ΔG0), enthalpy change (ΔG0), and entropy change (ΔG0). Gibbs free energy change (ΔG0) can be evaluated by applying Van’t Hoff equation.
(16)ΔG°=−RTlnK0,where T, R, and K0 are absolute temperature (K), universal gas constant (8.314 J K-1mol-1), and thermodynamic constant (dimensionless), respectively. The third principle in thermodynamics emphasizes the relationship between ΔG0 and the other two parameters in
(17)ΔG0=ΔH0−TΔS0,where ΔG0, ΔH0, and ΔS0 are Gibbs free energy change (J mol-1), enthalpy change (J mol-1), and entropy change (J mol-1K-1). Combining Equations (16) and (17) will generate a new formula for Van’t Hoff equation expressed in Equation (18). Based on Equation (18), ΔG0 and ΔS0 of the reaction can be determined from the slope and the intercept of the plot of lnK0 (y-axis) versus T−1 (x-axis).
(18)lnK0=−−ΔH0RT+ΔS0R.


## 2.1. Chemical and Materials

The bamboo sawdust was collected from the local areas where bamboo is processed for furniture applications. All chemicals (FeCl3.6H2O, KOH, HCl, NaOH, and NaCl) used in this study were purchased from Rankem chemical supplier, Ethiopia. The analytical standard for ciprofloxacin hydrochloride (CIP) with purity >99.7% was obtained from Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. All chemicals used in this study were analytical grade and used without further purification.


## 2.2. Adsorbent Preparation

The collected bamboo sawdust was washed to remove any dirt bound to the biomass and dried overnight at 120°C. Afterward, it was grounded to a particle size less than 850μm. Bamboo sawdust was chemically modified with ferric chloride and potassium hydroxide at the same time, employing a 5 : 1 w/w ratio of bamboo sawdust to FeCl3.6H2O and a 1 : 5 w/v ratio of bamboo sawdust to KOH (1 M). The chemical modification was carried out at 80°C and 600 rpm for 2 hrs. The mixture was then dried at 60°C in a vacuum oven for 24 hrs. The dried and chemically treated bamboo sawdust was ground to a particle size of less than 450 μm before being carbonized at 700°C for 1 hr at a heating ramp rate of 10°C/min in an oxygen-limited carbolite furnace. The carbonized bamboo (bamboo biochar) was then washed with ultrapure water until the filtrate pH became 7 and dried at 120°C overnight to get modified bamboo biochar (MBC). The MBC was then ground to a particle size less than 150 μm and stored in air-tight polyethylene bags for further use. Moreover, unmodified bamboo biochar (UBC), bamboo treated solely with ferric chloride (FMBC), and bamboo treated with only potassium hydroxide (KMBC) were also prepared via a similar synthesis route to investigate the effect of chemical modification and individual chemical modifications.


## 2.3. Adsorbent Characterization

The structure and crystal phase of the modified (MBC) and unmodified bamboo biochar (UBC) were analyzed by conducting the X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD; Rigaku MiniFlex 600 Benchtop). In XRD analysis, Cu Kα radiation was applied to generate X-rays at 1.54441 Å wavelength employing the following operational conditions, 40 kV and 15 mA, and angle scanning (2θ) ranging from 10° to 60°. Moreover, the presence of functional groups was identified by Spectrum 65 PerkinElmer-FTIR in the range of 4000-400 cm-1 (resolution: 4 cm-1, no. of scans: 16) using KBr pellets. In addition, the specific surface areas of the biochars were analyzed with nitrogen adsorption-desorption at 77°K using SA-9600 Series Surface Area Analyzer (Horiba Instruments, Inc.). The samples were degassed at 100°C for 2 hrs before analysis. The specific surface area was determined by the multipoint BET method in the N2 relative pressure (P/P0) range of 0.05–0.30.


### 2.3.1. Determination ofpHpzc

The point of zero charge (pHpzc) is one of the vital material characterization parameters that describes the net surface charge of adsorbents as a function of solution pH [26, 57]. The point of zero charge (pHpzc) of MBC was conducted according to the method used in the previous studies [26, 57, 58]. In this study, pHpzc was determined using eight Erlenmeyer flasks filled with 50 mL CIP solution (20 mg L-1). Initially, the pH values of the solutions were adjusted to 2–11 using 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH. Following that, 0.1 g of the MBC was added to each flask and shaken at 200 rpm for 24 hrs. The final pH values of the solutions were then measured. The variations between final and initial pH values were recorded (y-axis) and plotted against the initial pH values (x-axis). The initial pH value at which y-axis = 0 denotes the point of zero charge (pHpzc) value.


## 2.3.1. Determination ofpHpzc

The point of zero charge (pHpzc) is one of the vital material characterization parameters that describes the net surface charge of adsorbents as a function of solution pH [26, 57]. The point of zero charge (pHpzc) of MBC was conducted according to the method used in the previous studies [26, 57, 58]. In this study, pHpzc was determined using eight Erlenmeyer flasks filled with 50 mL CIP solution (20 mg L-1). Initially, the pH values of the solutions were adjusted to 2–11 using 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH. Following that, 0.1 g of the MBC was added to each flask and shaken at 200 rpm for 24 hrs. The final pH values of the solutions were then measured. The variations between final and initial pH values were recorded (y-axis) and plotted against the initial pH values (x-axis). The initial pH value at which y-axis = 0 denotes the point of zero charge (pHpzc) value.


## 2.4. Adsorption Experiments

A preliminary batch adsorption study was undertaken to investigate the CIP removal efficiencies of UBC, MBC, FMBC, and KMBC. Based on the preliminary study, MBC showed superior performance on CIP removal and was chosen for further adsorption study. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted in a water bath shaker under controlled temperature and shaking speed. A stock solution of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride monohydrate (1 g L-1) was prepared by dissolving 1000 mg of ciprofloxacin in one-litre ultrapure water. The adsorption equilibrium time was determined at pH=7.0, CIP initial concentration of 20 mg L-1, and adsorbent dosage of 0.5 g L-1 considering contact time of 10, 30, 50, 70, 90, 110, and 130 minutes. To obtain an optimal operational condition, adsorption process parameters such as CIP initial concentration (5–50 mg L-1), pH=2−12, contact time (5–60 min), and adsorbents dose (0.25–1.25 g L-1) were studied. These parameter ranges were selected based on adsorption experiments (equilibrium study, point of zero charges, and preliminary test) as well as commonly reported operational conditions for CIP removal in the literature. The pH of the CIP solution was adjusted using 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH. All adsorption studies were carried out in a 100 mL conical flask using a water shaker bath at 200 rpm and 25°C. The temperature was varied from 25 to 45°C for the thermodynamic study. Before CIP analysis, the adsorption solution was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 minutes and filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter. Adsorption experiments of kinetics, isotherms, and thermodynamics were carried out in triplicate. Equations (1) and (2) were used to compute CIP removal efficiency and adsorption capacity, respectively [5].
(1)Removal%=Co−CtCo×100.The adsorption capacity was obtained from the following equation:(2)qt=Co−CtVM,where C0, Ct, V, and M are the initial CIP concentration (mg L-1), ciprofloxacin concentration (mg L-1) at a given time t (min), volume of the solution (L), and mass of the adsorbent (g), respectively.


## 2.5. Ciprofloxacin Analysis

Ciprofloxacin concentration was analyzed using a spectrophotometer (UV1610, China) at 274.8 nm. The calibration curve was plotted using seven standard ciprofloxacin solutions: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 mg L-1, as well as a blank. The obtained standard calibration (R2=0.998) curve is expressed in
(3)Y=0.09117X+0.02133,where Y is CIP concentration (mg L-1) and X is the UV–vis spectrophotometer absorbance reading of the solution at 274.8 nm wavelength.


## 2.6. Adsorbent Regeneration

Adsorbent reusability is one of the most important economic parameters of the adsorption systems in water and wastewater treatment applications [10]. Therefore, in this study, the reusability of MBC was examined for five consecutive CIP adsorption-desorption cycles at an optimal operating conditions (pH=7.5, CIP concentration=20 mg L-1, MBC dose=0.5 g L-1, time=120 min, shaking speed=200 rpm, and temperature=25°C) obtained in the previous steps. CIP desorption optimization experiments were conducted using 0.3 M NaOH, 0.3 M HCl, methanol, and 3% NaOH+methanol to get the best desorbing solution for the CIP. These solutions were employed in the previous studies as eluents for CIP desorption from various adsorbents. The MBC reusability test was then conducted using the best desorbing solution. After each cycle, MBC was thoroughly washed with ultrapure water, filtered and dried up in an oven, and then reused in the next adsorption cycle. The adsorption efficiency of MBC after each cycle was calculated using Equation (1).


## 2.7. Design of Experiments Using a Central Composite Design

Central composite design (CCD) is one of the frameworks of response surface methodology (RSM) often employed to statistically analyze experimental data. Design expert software (trial version: 11.0) was used to evaluate all parameters and experimental data. In this approach, responses are affected by various process variables. Main process variables such as pH, adsorbent dose, contact time, and CIP concentration were combined to give 30 experiments for CIP removal from an aqueous solution. An equilibrium time study and determination of the point of zero charges of MBC were conducted before developing the CCD experimental design. Thus, the selection of levels of pH and contact time was based on the data obtained from these studies and the review of the previous studies. Levels of other parameters such as initial CIP concentration and adsorbent dose were based on the CIP adsorption preliminary study and commonly reported values in previous studies. Table1 shows the independent variable ranges and their coded values. CIP has pKa values of 6.1 and 8.7. In this regard, the pH values of low (5.25), central (7.5), and high (9.75) were selected to include the pH level less than 6.1, greater than 8.7, and 6.1-8.7. Low contact time (18.75 min) and high (46.25 min) were selected after conducting the equilibrium time study. Contact time values below the equilibrium time (70 min) were selected to analyze the effect of contact time on CIP adsorption. The relationship between the coded and real (uncoded) values is presented in [59]
(4)xi=Xi−X0ΔX,where xi stands for the dimensionless coded value of the ith independent variable, Xi is the actual value of the independent variable, X0 is the central point actual value, and ∆X is the step change value of the variable.Table 1
The independent variables and their levels in the CCD experimental design.
FactorsLevelsStar pointsActualCodedLow (-1)Central (0)High (+)-α+αCIP initial concentration (mg L-1)A2030401050Adsorbent dosage (g L-1)B0.50.751.000.1251.25pHC5.257.59.75312Contact time (min)D18.7530.0046.25560In this regard, RSM was used to derive a quadratic polynomial model for expressing the effects of the independent variables on the response. The quadratic equation of the optimal model was given by [59]
(5)Y=βo+∑i=1n=4βiXi+∑i=04∑j=14βijXiXj+∑i=14βiiXj2+ε,where Y is the model predicted response, β0 is the coefficient of the model (constant), Xi (i=1to4) represents the independent variables, and βi, βii, and βij (iandj=1–4) indicate the linear, quadratic, and second-order interaction coefficients, and ε is the corresponding error. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to statistically assess the potential of the developed polynomial model in predicting the experimental results.


## 2.8. Adsorption Kinetic Study

The time profile data of CIP adsorption onto the modified biochar were analyzed using four kinetic models commonly used in solid-liquid adsorption processes: the pseudo-first-order equation, the pseudo-second-order equation, Elovich, and intraparticle kinetic models as written in Equations (6)–(9), respectively [60]. Adsorption kinetics was studied using the optimum parameters obtained in the RSM optimization step.
(6)lnqe−qt=lnqe−K1t,(7)tqt=1K22qe2+tqe,(8)qt=1βlnαβ+1βlnt,(9)qt=Kidt1/2+K0,where qe and qt are the amounts of CIP (mg g-1) adsorbed per unit mass of MBC at equilibrium and at a time t, respectively; K1, K2, and Kid are the pseudo-first-order (min-1), pseudo-second-order (g mg-1min-1), and intraparticle mg (g min0.5)-1 rate constants, respectively; α (mg g−1min−1) indicates the initial adsorption rate; β (g mg−1) represents the activation energy rate change with surface coverage; and Ko represents the thickness of the boundary layer.


## 2.9. Adsorption Isotherm Study

The adsorption performance of the CIP isotherm model is essential for investigating the interactions between CIP and biochar (MBC) during the adsorption process [1]. This study considered four isotherm models: Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) to evaluate the equilibrium CIP adsorption isotherm data expressed in Equations (10)–(13), respectively. The isotherm study was conducted using optimum operating conditions obtained from the CCD experimental design.
(10)Ceqe=1qmb+Ceqm,(11)lnqe=lnKF+lnCen,(12)qe=βlnKT+βlnCe,(13)lnqe=lnqm−Kε2,where Ce is the equilibrium concentration of the CIP in solution (mg L-1), qe is the adsorption capacity at equilibrium (mg g-1), b (L mg-1) is the Langmuir constant, and qm (mg g-1) is the maximum adsorption capacity. The maximum monolayer adsorption capacity (qm) and b were obtained from the slope and intercept of Ce versus Ce/qe plot. KF (mg g-1) denotes the Freundlich isotherm constant. Freundlich intensity parameter (n) indicates existing adsorption driving forces and heterogeneity degree of the surface. The Temkin model constants, β, and KT (L mg-1) are related to the heat of adsorption and maximum binding energy, respectively. In the D-R model, K stands for adsorption energy constant, qm represents the theoretical saturation capacity (mg g-1), and ε is the Polanyi potential, calculated from Equation (14). Based on the Langmuir equation, an essential parameter of adsorption (RL) is expressed in
(14)RL=11+bC0,where C0 (mg L-1) and b (L mg-1) are initial CIP concentration and Langmuir constant, respectively. The calculated value of RL can characterize the type of the isotherm and its nature: (i) irreversible isotherm (RL=0), (ii) favorable isotherm (0<RL<1), (iii) linear isotherm (RL=1), and unfavorable isotherm (RL>1) [8, 61]. The above D-R model can be evaluated using
(15)ε=RTln1+1Ce.The constantK is expressed by the slope of the plot of lnqe vs. ε2, and the adsorption capacity, qm (mg g-1), can be obtained from the intercept.


## 2.10. Adsorption Thermodynamic Study

The thermodynamic study was conducted using 25, 35, and 45°C at a shaking speed of 200 rpm. Optimum CIP adsorption conditions obtained in the CCD design were employed to conduct the thermodynamic study. There are three essential parameters for thermodynamic study, namely, Gibbs free energy change (ΔG0), enthalpy change (ΔG0), and entropy change (ΔG0). Gibbs free energy change (ΔG0) can be evaluated by applying Van’t Hoff equation.
(16)ΔG°=−RTlnK0,where T, R, and K0 are absolute temperature (K), universal gas constant (8.314 J K-1mol-1), and thermodynamic constant (dimensionless), respectively. The third principle in thermodynamics emphasizes the relationship between ΔG0 and the other two parameters in
(17)ΔG0=ΔH0−TΔS0,where ΔG0, ΔH0, and ΔS0 are Gibbs free energy change (J mol-1), enthalpy change (J mol-1), and entropy change (J mol-1K-1). Combining Equations (16) and (17) will generate a new formula for Van’t Hoff equation expressed in Equation (18). Based on Equation (18), ΔG0 and ΔS0 of the reaction can be determined from the slope and the intercept of the plot of lnK0 (y-axis) versus T−1 (x-axis).
(18)lnK0=−−ΔH0RT+ΔS0R.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization of Biochar

#### 3.1.1. FTIR Analysis

The FTIR spectra of unmodified biochar (UMC), modified biochar (MBC), and modified biochar after CIP adsorption (MBC-CIP) and CIP are presented in Figure1. In MBC, new peaks appeared at 3543–3456 cm-1 (broad peak), 2918–2835 cm-1, 2250–2000 cm-1, and 1052 cm-1, which were assigned to the stretching vibrations of –OH (hydroxyl or carboxyl groups [54], C-H (asymmetrically and symmetrically stretching vibrations of aliphatic), C ≡ O (alkyne), and C-O (carboxylic acid and esters), respectively. The dehydration of biochar (chemically treated) sample during the carbonation process resulted in the O-H vibration stretching of water molecules [26]. Additionally, the new peak emerged in MBC at 540 cm−1 shows Fe-O-Fe stretching vibration, indicating that iron oxide was successfully supported on the biochar surface [26, 62]. Thus, the FTIR spectra result showed that the surface of MBC contained rich oxygen-containing groups and aromatic structures, which provided favorable conditions for CIP adsorption.Figure 1
FTIR spectra of unmodified (UBC), modified biochar (MBC), modified biochar after adsorption (MBC-CIP), and ciprofloxacin (CIP).After CIP adsorption onto MBC (CIP-MBC), as shown in Figure1, the peaks observed in MBC at 3500, 2872, and 1052 cm-1 were shifted to 3407, 2917, and 1018 cm-1, respectively. On the other hand, the peaks observed at 2188 and 540 disappeared after adsorption. Moreover, the new narrow peak (2920 cm-1) that appeared on MBC-CIP is similar to the peak observed in CIP (2920 cm-1). The intensity of the peak observed in MBC after adsorption (MBC-CIP) at 3400 cm-1 is similar to the intensity of the peak at 3500 cm-1 in CIP. Hence, it is evident that the –OH, C-H, C-O, C ≡ O, and Fe-O groups observed on MBC were involved in the CIP adsorption process. The presence of several functional groups on the surface of MBC played an important role in CIP removal from aqueous solution via electrostatic interactions, complexation reaction, π-π EDA interactions, and hydrogen bonding [47].


#### 3.1.2. BET Surface Area

The BET surface area of MBC (1158.050 m2 g-1) was remarkably higher than that of UBC (565.095 m2 g-1). This result indicated that simultaneous activation of bamboo sawdust with ferric chloride and potassium hydroxide enhanced the surface area of the biochar significantly. The increase in surface area may be attributed to the formation of new pores and the opening of initially inaccessible pores during the chemical activation process, which would help develop a more porous structure [54]. The surface area is an important parameter that plays a significant role in physical adsorption. The higher surface area of the material leads to higher adsorption of the pollutant due to the availability of many adsorption sites for more organic pollutant removal [54]. Accordingly, MBC is expected to have higher removal of CIP molecules from aqueous solutions than the UBC.


#### 3.1.3. XRD

The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) (XRD; Rigaku MiniFlex 600 Benchtop) was conducted to investigate the crystalline compositions of the bamboo biochars. The XRD analysis result is shown in Figure2. The peaks at 30.1, 35.6, 43.2, and 57.2 are assigned to magnetite [63], whereas the peak observed in MBC at 33.2 is assigned to hematite. The emergence of these peaks on the surface of MBC confirmed the presence of Fe-O in the structure of the modified biochar adsorbent. Al et al. [26] detected a peak at a similar angular degree for Fe3O4 cubic crystals on an adsorbent prepared from powdered activated carbon magnetized by iron(III) oxide magnetic nanoparticles.Figure 2
XRD patterns of raw and modified biochars.Iron (Fe) was believed to be present on the surface of modified biochar (MBC) as indicated by characteristic peaks of magnetite and hematite [64–66]. The XRD result revealed that Fe was successfully loaded onto the MBC, which is consistent with the findings of the FTIR analysis. Therefore, the chemical modification of the biochar has desirable structural changes on the biochar, as evidenced by the XRD plot.


#### 3.1.4. Point of Zero Charge (pHpzc)

DeterminingpHpzc is essential for the adsorption process study as the adsorption mechanism strongly depends on the solution pH. The point of zero charge of MBC is about 6.5, as shown in FigureS1. Based on the pHpzc result, the surface of MBC is positively charged when pH is below 6.5 and negatively charged when pH is above 6.5. At pH below 6.0, ciprofloxacin is mainly present in its cationic form [54], and the surface of the MBC is positively charged. Hence, the adsorbent and ciprofloxacin molecules repel each other, and thus, CIP removal efficiency decreased. Increasing pH above 6.1 changes the CIP molecule from cationic to zwitterionic leading to a gradual increase in CIP adsorption [67]. Due to the strong electrostatic interaction between MBC and CIP zwitterion (pH 6.0-8.7), maximum adsorption was obtained.In contrast, at pH higher than 8.7, the adsorption process efficiency decreased as the repulsive force increased between the negatively charged MBC surface and anionic CIP molecules [59]. Similar results were obtained by Asghar et al. [59] in removing ciprofloxacin from water using γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles. Consistently, Ji et al. [28] reported similar results with a pH range (6–8) as an optimal condition for titanate nanotubes to remove CIP molecules.


### 3.2. Adsorption of CIP onto MBC Adsorbent

In this work, different bamboo-based adsorbents, unmodified bamboo biochar (UBC), bamboo biochar modified with ferric chloride (FBC), bamboo biochar modified with potassium hydroxide (KMBC), and bamboo biochar modified with both ferric chloride and potassium hydroxide (MBC), were prepared. The CIP removal efficiencies and adsorption capacities of the as-synthesized bamboo-based adsorbents are shown in Table2. MBC was prepared chemically by modifying the bamboo sawdust with ferric chloride and potassium hydroxide at the same time as depicted in Section 2.2. As shown in Table 2, the UBC, FMBC, KMBC, and MBC gave 45.01, 67.38, 79.45, and 95.67% CIP removal, respectively. This experiment was conducted at CIP initial concentration (25 mg L-1), adsorbent dose (0.5 g L-1), contact time (46.25 min), and pH (7.0). The result indicated that modification of the bamboo by KOH, FeCl3, or KOH/FeCl3 has resulted in increased CIP removal. The high adsorption capacity can be ascribed to the high surface area of the adsorbent (1158.05 m2g-1) and the strong interaction of CIP molecules with MBC surface functional groups.Table 2
Adsorbent screening test for CIP removal.
AdsorbentShort name% CIP removalDecisionUnmodified bamboo biocharUBC45.01Not selectedFerric chloride modified bamboo biocharFMBC67.38Not selectedPotassium hydroxide modified bamboo biocharKMBC79.45Not selectedFerric chloride+potassium hydroxide modified bamboo biocharMBC95.67Selected∗Experimental condition: CIP initial concentration: 25 mg L-1, adsorbent dose: 0.5 g L-1, time: 46.25 min, and pH: 7.0.MBC has remarkably superior adsorption capacity (78.43 mg g-1) than all other bamboo-based adsorbents (UBC, FMBC, and KMBC). This may be attributed to the collaborative effect of both KOH and FeCl3 activation. Fe-O group was detected on the surface of the MBC as confirmed by XRD and FTIR spectra analysis. The high adsorption performance observed for KOH/FeCl3 modified adsorbent is may be due to the formation of Fe-O sorption sites [48–51] in addition to the formation of -OH, C-H, C-O, and C ≡ O functional groups. Iron functional groups may form a complex reaction with CIP zwitterions increasing CIP removal from aqueous solution. Hence, MBC (bamboo biochar with combined modification) was selected and used as the best adsorbent throughout this study. The adsorbent has magnetic properties because of iron which may help during the separation of the adsorbent.


#### 3.2.1. Model Fitting and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Using CCD

The central composite design (CCD) was used to optimize the CIP adsorption process parameters. The CCD experimental design of CIP adsorption data is presented in TableS1. The second-order polynomial model fitted the experimental data of CIP adsorption onto MBC. The suggested quadratic model’s R2 and adjusted R2 were 0.9876 and 0.9820, respectively. ANOVA was used to assess the validity and adequacy of the model and determine the effect of main factors and possible interaction factors. ANOVA indicated that the suggested polynomial model was statistically significant. The result of the ANOVA analysis is presented in Table 3. As shown in Table 3, the F and p values of the model were 229.46 and <0.0001, respectively. There is only a 0.01% chance that an F value this large could occur due to noise. A, B, C, D, AB, BD, CD, B2, and C2 are significant model terms from the ANOVA table. Hence, all the independent variables (initial CIP concentration, pH, contact time, and adsorbent dosage) significantly affected the CIP removal. Both Yousefi et al. and Asghar et al. reported similar findings for the CIP removal using magnetization of functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes and γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles as an adsorbent, respectively [9, 59]. In their studies, adsorption parameters including initial CIP concentration, pH, contact time, and adsorbent dose were significant in CIP removal from an aqueous solution.Table 3
ANOVA results of the CIP adsorption onto MBC.
SourceSum of squaresdfMean squareF valuep valueModel4671.169519.02229.46<0.0001SignificantA-initial CIP con787.421787.42348.12<0.0001B-adsorbent dose2224.3412224.34983.38<0.0001C-pH144.011144.0163.67<0.0001D-contact time691.761691.76305.83<0.0001AB326.801326.80144.48<0.0001BD129.791129.7957.38<0.0001CD138.471138.4761.22<0.0001B2150.601150.6066.58<0.0001C2102.791102.7945.45<0.0001Residual45.24202.26Lack of fit37.98152.531.740.2806Not significantPure error7.2651.45Cor total4716.4029df: degree of freedom.Model terms withp values less than 0.05 are significant, and terms with p values higher than 0.05 are not significant. Relative to pure error, the lack of fit is not significant, as indicated by the lack of fit F value of 1.74. There is a 28.06% chance that a lack of fit F value this large could occur due to noise. As a result, a lack of fit that is not significant is desired since we want the model to fit the CIP experimental data well. Adeq precision measures the signal-to-noise ratio, and a value greater than 4 is desirable. In this design, the ratio of 56.593 indicates an adequate signal. This model can be used to navigate the design space successfully.Based on the CCD statistical analysis, the final predicted model equation in terms of coded factors is expressed in Equation (19) with significant factors (main and interaction). In Equation (19), A, B, C, and D are the coded values of initial ciprofloxacin concentration, adsorbent dose, pH, and contact time, respectively, whereas AB, BD, and CD are the significant interaction parameters.
(19)CIPRemoval=89.49−5.73A+9.63B−2.45C+5.37D+4.52AB−2.85BD+2.94CD−2.30B2−1.90C2.The influence of each factor on the removal of CIP can be seen from their coefficients in Equation (19). The coefficients of each factor are -5.73, 9.63, -2.45, and 5.37, respectively, confirming that A and C have a negative effect, whereas B and D have a positive effect on the CIP removal. The results displayed in Table 3 indicated that the influence of each parameter on the CIP removal followed the order: B > A > D > C, which is in agreement with the results described in Equation (19). Notably, the adsorbent dose and the initial concentration of CIP had the most significant effect on the CIP removal process. Also, the final equation in terms of the actual factors for CIP adsorption onto MBC is presented in
(20)CIPRemoval=75.058−1.92∗initialCIP+1328.55∗adsorbentdose+1.45∗pH+0.29∗contacttime+36.15∗initilalCIP∗adsorbentdose−16.57∗adsorbentdose∗contacttime+0.09∗pH∗contacttime−14726.5∗adsorbentdose2−0.37∗pH2.According to the model fit statistics, the regression parameters such as the coefficient of determination (R2), adjusted coefficient of determination, and predicted determination coefficients are 0.9876, 0.9820, and 0.9670, respectively. Thus, the model represents 98% of the variation in the CIP removal response. The values of model regression parameters indicate proper fitness of the model as shown in Table 2. Using the CCD experimental design, Asghar et al. reported similar model fit statistics values (R2=0.96) for the CIP adsorption [59].Diagnostic plots such as externally studentized residuals against predicted, predicted against actual, and the normal probability against externally studentized residuals were analyzed to assess the model’s adequacy. These results are presented in FigureS2(a)-S2(c). The normal probability against externally studentized residual plot shown in Figure S2(a) indicated that all the points are close to the straight line, showing that the error was normally distributed. From the plot of predicted against actual shown in Figure S2(b), it can be seen that the predicted values are well correlated with the actual (experimental) values, and the model predicted data were not significantly different from the experimental results. The highest residual (difference between actual and predicted) is 2.93 for the CIP removal of 88.35%. In a plot of externally studentized residuals against predicted shown in Figure S2(c), the residuals were randomly distributed between +3.00 and −3.00, indicating that the CCD model successfully established the relationship between the independent variable and the CIP removal [68]. Overall, the diagnostic plot results agree with the coefficient of determination values of the model. Thus, the quadratic model suggested by CCD experimental design described the experimental CIP adsorption data adequately.


#### 3.2.2. Effect of Individual Process Variables

The effect of the adsorption process variables such as pH, initial CIP concentration, adsorbent dose, and contact time on CIP removal was investigated. FigureS3(a)-S3(d) displays the one factor plots for each main factor. These include initial CIP concentration, adsorbent dose, pH, and contact time.(1) Effect of CIP Initial Concentration. The effect of initial CIP concentration on the adsorption efficiency was investigated. Figure S3(a) depicted that increasing the CIP initial concentration from 10 to 40 mg L-1 decreased the CIP removal efficiency from 100 to 75.52% at pH (7.5), adsorbent dose (0.5 g L-1), and contact time (46.25 min). In line with this result, Yousefi et al. reported that increasing the CIP concentration from 30 to 100 mg L-1 decreased CIP removal efficiency from 83% to 59% [9]. On the other hand, Wang et al. investigated the effect of the initial CIP concentration (10–200 mg L-1) at pH (6) and adsorbent dosage (135 mg L-1) on the adsorption capacity. In their study, the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent for cationic CIP increased very quickly for CIP initial concentration of less than 50 mg L-1 and then decreased with the increase of CIP initial concentration above 50 mg L-1 [69]. Hence, an increase in CIP initial concentration decreased the removal efficiency. This may be attributed to the lack of available sites on the adsorbent for the uptake of high CIP concentration [70]. In this study, unlike the case for CIP percentage removal, the CIP adsorption capacity increased from 20 mg g-1 to 60 mg g-1 by increasing the initial CIP concentration from 10 to 40 mg L-1. This is due to the reduction of the resistance to CIP uptake from the aqueous solution. Moreover, the higher initial CIP concentration provides a driving force to overcome the mass transfer resistance of the CIP between the solid and aqueous phases [70].(2) Effect of Adsorbent Dose. The adsorbent dose has a significant effect on the CIP removal from an aqueous solution. As depicted in Figure S3(b), using an adsorbent dose of 0.25 g L-1 at pH 7.5, 30 mg L-1 initial CIP concentration, and 46.25 min contact time resulted in 96.02% CIP removal, whereas using an adsorbent dose of 1.0 g L-1 at similar adsorption conditions almost completely removed CIP from the solution. A similar adsorption trend was observed by Gulen and Demircivi [71] in the adsorption of CIP from water using a 2: 1 dioctahedral clay structure with the increase of CIP adsorption from 1.8% (0.034 g L-1) to 99.2% (2 g L-1). Moreover, Shang et al. reported a significant increase in the CIP removal efficiency from 36 to 100%, for an increase in adsorbent (herbal residue biochar) dosage from 0.025 to 0.5 g L-1 [72]. The increase in the percentage of CIP removal with an increase in adsorbent dose is because of the increase of available active sites, which enhanced the CIP uptake [59, 73].(3) Effect of pH. The pH of the solution is an important parameter of adsorption processes because it affects the surface nature of the adsorbent and adsorbate-adsorbent interactions [59]. At pH less than pKa1 (6.1), the amine group in piperazine moiety receives a proton, and CIP+ appears. However, for pH above pKa2 (8.7), CIP occurs in anionic form (CIP−) due to amine group deprotonation. At pH between pKa1 and pKa2 of CIP, the CIP molecule exists in zwitterionic form due to the charge balance of the amine and carboxylic groups [9, 74]. Figure S3(c) depicted that the CIP removal efficiency of MBC increased by increasing the pH of the solution from 5.25 to 7.5 and then decreased with any further increase in pH. Hence, increasing pH from 5.25 to 7.5 at fixed initial CIP concentration (20 mg L-1), adsorbent dose (0.5 g L-1), and contact time (46.25 min) increased the CIP removal from 93.62% to 96.02%. Further elevation of pH to 9.75 reduced the CIP removal to 94.61%. Thus, the optimal pH for CIP adsorption onto the MBC is 7.5. This pH level is very important since ciprofloxacin forms zwitterion and that led to the strong electrostatic attraction between CIP and negatively charged MBC. Hence, maximum adsorption was obtained at this pH level. Dehghan et al. [75] observed a similar adsorption trend for the CIP using a metal-organic framework (MOF). They reported that an increase in pH from 3 to 7.5 increased the adsorption of CIP onto MOF. However, at pH values above 7.5, CIP adsorption decreased. The reason for this adsorption behavior can be attributed to protonation–deprotonation reactions in groups of CIP molecules [75].(4) Effect of Contact Time. Contact time is one of the significant factors in the adsorption of the CIP onto the MBC in this work. As shown in Figure S3(d), adsorption at an adsorbent dose (0.5 g L-1), pH (7.5), CIP initial concentration (20 mg L-1), and the contact time (18.75 min) resulted in 79.58% of CIP removal. However, CIP removal efficiency increased to 96.02% under similar adsorption conditions when the contact time increased to 46.25 min. Moreover, Figure S4 showed that the adsorption rate was rapid in the first 30 minutes and moderate in 30-70 minutes. This may be attributed to the availability of abundant free active sites on MBC at the initial adsorption stage for CIP sorption. The rate became very slow after 70 minutes, and no appreciable CIP removal was achieved. Hence, equilibrium was reached at about 70 min. The number of available active sites decreases with time, and eventually, the adsorbent becomes saturated [70]. For CIP adsorption process, optimization and adsorption experiments were conducted using the contact time range (less than 60 min), which is intentionally taken to fully investigate the effect of contact time and its interaction effects. Increasing the contact time allowed CIP molecules to reach the active sites of the adsorbent up to equilibrium time. Beyond the equilibrium time, no significant uptake of CIP took place as depicted in Figure S4.


#### 3.2.3. Interaction Effects of Process Variables

Response surface methodology is a powerful tool with important features for evaluating the interactive effect of variables. In this study, 3D surface plots (Figures3(a)–3(c)) were employed to study the interaction effects on the CIP removal. The significant interaction effects include initial CIP concentration-adsorbent dose, adsorbent dose-contact time, and pH-contact time.Figure 3
Interaction effects: (a) adsorbent dose versus CIP initial concentration, (b) contact time versus adsorbent dose, and (c) contact time versus pH.
(a)(b)(c)(1) CIP Initial Concentration and Adsorbent Dose Interaction Effect. The interaction effect of CIP initial concentration and the adsorbent dose was shown in Figure 3(a). The interaction effect of CIP initial concentration and the adsorbent dose was positively significant. From the 3D plot, it was observed that the CIP removal was highest at the initial CIP concentration range of 20-25 mg L-1 and adsorbent dose range of 0.75–1.0 g L-1. The enhanced removal of CIP at the higher MBC dose was due to higher active sites for CIP adsorption [76].(2) Adsorbent Dose and Contact Time Interaction Effect. The interaction effect of MBC dose and the contact time on CIP removal is displayed using a 3D plot in Figure 3(b). CIP removal was highest at the MBC dose of 0.75-1.0 g L-1 and at the reaction time of 40-46 min. This study revealed that CIP removal increased with an increase in contact time and adsorbent dose. This is may be attributed to the availability of more active sites with adsorbent dose increment and enough contact time for MBC and CIP molecules to interact with each other [76].(3) pH and Contact Time Interaction Effect. The interaction effect of pH and contact time on CIP removal is shown in Figure 3(c). The percentage of CIP removal increased with an increase in contact time. A kinetic study showed that the adsorption rate was rapid in the first 30 minutes and became slow after 30 minutes. The CIP adsorption is strongly dependent on the pH of the solution. CIP exists in zwitterion form at pH between 6.1 and 8.7, and the electrostatic interaction between CIP and MBC is strong. The point of zero charge of MBC was 6.5, and for pH less than 6.1 and beyond 8.7, the repulsive forces became dominant, and less CIP removal was achieved. Thus, this pH range is an optimum pH level for the highest CIP removal. Figure 3(c) depicted that when pH decreased from 9.75 to 5.25 with an increase in contact time from 18.75 to 46.25 min, the CIP removal increased from 71.88 to 93.62%. In contrast, an increase in pH and a decrease in contact time decreased CIP removal. The reverse of this condition decreased the CIP removal. This showed that contact time had a superior influence on CIP removal than pH for interaction effects. However, for an increase in pH and contact time from 5.25 and 18.75 min to 9.75 and 46.25 min, CIP removal increased from 83.07 to 94.61%, respectively. Maximum CIP removal (96.02) was obtained at pH (7.5) and contact time (46.25 min) using MBC adsorbent.


#### 3.2.4. Process Optimization

The optimization approach followed in CCD design to obtain the best operating conditions was by minimizing the adsorbent dosage, taking the initial CIP concentration in the range, pH in the range, and contact time in the range, and by maximizing CIP removal. Based on this criterion, the optimal condition that gave maximum CIP removal efficiency (96.02%) using the MBC adsorbent was pH (7.5), adsorbent (0.5 g L-1), contact time (46.257 min), and initial CIP concentration (20 mg L-1) with a good desirability value of 0.971. Adsorption tests were conducted at these optimum conditions to confirm the model’s credibility. Accordingly, CIP removal values of 95.68, 96.42, and 96.24 were obtained, and the mean value of these results is 96.11%. Thus, the model predicted CIP removal (96%) is close to the experimental value obtained (96.11%), showing that the model is valid.


### 3.3. Adsorption Kinetics

The kinetic study determines the effect of contact time on CIP adsorption onto MBC. The results of CIP adsorption kinetics parameters are described in Table4. The kinetic models are presented in Figures 4(a)–4(d). Initially, the sorption process was vigorous due to abundant free actives sites on the biochar surface where CIP molecules can be sorbed quickly. With time, the unoccupied active sites reduced significantly, declining the solution and solid adsorption rate to attain a steady state [67].Table 4
Kinetic models and values of their parameters.
Pseudo-first-order modelPseudo-second-orderK1 (min-1)qe,cal (mg g-1)qe,exp (mg g-1)R2K2 (g mg-1 min-1)qe,cal (mg g-1)qe,exp (mg g-1)R20.0507239.605.0290.8130.01139.6040.3870.994Intraparticle modelElovichKid (mg g-1 min-1/2)K0R2α (mg g-1 min-1)β (g mg-1)R23.2728311.8940.6400.12115.9040.859Note:qe,cal: calculated adsorbent capacity; qe,exp: experimental adsorbent capacity.Figure 4
Kinetic models of CIP adsorption onto MBC. (a) Pseudo-first-order, (b) pseudo-second-order, (c) Elovich, and (d) intraparticle models.
(a)(b)(c)(d)As shown in Table4, the pseudo-second-order model has the highest coefficient of determination (R2=0.994) compared to other kinetic models. In addition, qe (calculated) using a pseudo-second-order kinetic model is very close to the experimental qe. Hence, the pseudo-second-order model provided the best fit for the CIP experimental data as shown in Figure 4(b), suggesting that the rate of ciprofloxacin adsorption onto the MBC followed the pseudo-second-order model. Overall, these results suggest that chemisorption controlled the rate of CIP adsorption [1, 60], which involves covalent bonding through sharing electrons between MBC and CIP molecule [67]. More specifically, the π-π interaction, complexation reaction, and hydrogen bonding may have played a role in the chemisorption process. Similar findings have been reported in the literature [55].The intraparticle diffusion model was employed to investigate the rate-controlling step [77]. As the K0 increases, the contribution of the surface sorption in the rate-controlling step increases. The linear fit plot of qt versus t0.5 is displayed in Figure 4(d). The simple plot of qt versus t0.5 for the intraparticle model presented in Fig S5 showed multilinear behavior. This suggests that the adsorption process possessed multiple steps. Solute adsorption by porous adsorbents consists of three consecutive steps [27]. The first step represents the improvisational or external adsorption process. The second step is the intraparticle diffusion phase having gradual adsorption that occurs when intraparticle diffusion is rate-limiting. The last step is regarded as a final equilibrium phase in which the intraparticle diffusion starts to slow down due to a significantly lower adsorbate concentration. The intraparticle diffusion is the rate-limiting step when the regression line passes through the origin. In contrast, when the regression line does not pass through the origin, other mechanisms can control the adsorption process in addition to intraparticle diffusion.The plots showed a multilinear trend, indicating that there were three steps during the CIP adsorption process, as shown in FigureS5. The first stage occurred from 0 to 30 min0.5 and represented boundary layer mass transfer [11]. The second linear segment included the adsorption period from 30 to 80 min0.5 and which represents the intraparticle diffusion process. The third stage took place between 80 and 120 min0.5, and adsorption of CIP molecules occurred on the interior surface of the MBC. The last stage showed quite low slope due to the decrease in CIP concentrations [74] and available active sites [1] suggesting that the adsorption equilibrium was reached. In the first step, the adsorption rate was rapid, indicating a fast removal of CIP, while in the subsequent steps, the adsorption process decreased due to the decrease in CIP concentrations and available active sites [1]. Also, the low linear dependency of CIP adsorption on t0.5 indicated that the CIP adsorption dynamics seemed to be less influenced by the intraparticle diffusion mechanism [77]. On the other hand, the high K0 parameter value showed that the effect of the boundary layer was also responsible for the CIP adsorption onto MBC. Hence, it was noted that the adsorption of CIP onto MBC was enhanced due to the high surface area of the MBC and by the involvement of various functional groups on the surface of biochar [67]. Overall, the adsorption rate of CIP onto MBC was jointly controlled by liquid film diffusion, surface adsorption, and intraparticle diffusion [39].


### 3.4. Adsorption Isotherms

The isotherm models are crucial for adsorption processes because the isotherm models can provide maximum sorption capacity and the expected interactions between adsorbent and adsorbate [27]. This study considered four isotherm models to interpret and describe CIP adsorption data, including Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R). Adsorption isotherm parameters were evaluated and presented in Table 5. Also, the plots of CIP adsorption isotherm are presented in Figure 5(a)–5(d). An increase in initial concentration increased CIP adsorption capacity because the binding sites could easily come into contact with the adsorbate. After the saturation of the active sites at a particular concentration, the adsorption remains unaffected with initial concentrations [67].Table 5
Isotherm models and values of their parameters.
LangmuirFreundlichqm (mg g-1)bR2KFnR278.430.3060.9945.28446.220.972TemkinDubinin-Radushkevich (DR)bKT (L mg-1)R2qmKR2407.9252765.5640.93168.5622.784∗10−80.859Figure 5
Isotherm models plots for CIP adsorption. (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, (c) Temkin, and (d) Dubinin-Radushkevich.
(a)(b)(c)(d)From the Langmuir isotherm, the calculated value ofRL using Equation (13) can characterize the type of the isotherm and its nature: (i) irreversible isotherm (RL=0), (ii) favorable isotherm (0<RL<1), (iii) linear isotherm (RL=1), and unfavorable isotherm (RL>1) [8, 61]. In this study, RL was 0.0264, which depicted that the CIP adsorption process by MBC was favorable. The results of regression coefficients indicated that the Langmuir (R2=0.99) model fits the adsorption process well, as shown in Figure 4(a). Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models fitted the CIP adsorption data reasonably, as described in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. Conformity to these models showed that the MBC surface nature was heterogeneous, and this result is consistent with the intraparticle kinetic study that hypothesized the multimechanistic nature of CIP adsorption onto MBC [78].In this study, the MBC surface heterogeneity was confirmed by the Freundlich constant, 1/n, which was 0.11 and lay between 0 and 1 for heterogeneous surfaces. In this model, if the value of n is higher than 10, an irreversible isotherm is obtained. Values of n greater than unity indicate preferential adsorption, and less than unity indicates poor adsorption. In the present study, the value of n is greater than unity, as indicated in Table 5. Hence, the adsorption of CIP onto MBC was favorable. It can be concluded that the adsorption process was monolayer adsorption on a heterogeneous surface which is in agreement with the previous work by Li et al. [8]. The functional groups of the modified biochar (MBC) responsible for the CIP adsorption include the OH, C-H, C-O, C ≡ O, and Fe–O–Fe. These functional groups on the biochar provided a heterogeneous surface. According to the experimental findings, CIP adsorption onto these functional groups of the MBC would be in a monolayer fashion.


### 3.5. Adsorption Thermodynamics

Thermodynamic parameters of CIP adsorption onto MBC were calculated using Equations (16)–(18), and the results are shown in Table 6.Table 6
Values of thermodynamic parameters for CIP adsorption onto MBC.
Temperature (K)ΔG0 (KJ mol-1)ΔH0 (KJ mol-1)ΔS0 (KJ mol-1 K-1)298.15-13.1089.7960.775308.15-14.557318.15-14.629The obtained negative values of∆G0 indicated the spontaneity of the sorption process [39]. These results show that higher temperatures slightly favored CIP adsorption onto the MBC. The positive values of change in enthalpy (ΔH°) for CIP adsorption showed that the CIP sorption was an endothermic process. The change in entropy (ΔS0) represents the adsorbent’s attraction to the biochar surface.The positive value of the entropy for CIP adsorption onto MBC indicated that the solvent molecules occupied on the surface were easily displaced by CIP molecules enhancing the adsorption capacity [67]. In the current study, the positive values of change in entropy showed that the process of CIP adsorption was spontaneous. In conclusion, the negative Gibbs free energy and positive entropy values revealed that the CIP adsorption was favorable [67].


### 3.6. Adsorbent Regeneration Study

A regeneration study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of MBC in the CIP adsorption process. Various CIP desorption solutions such as methanol, dilute HCl, 3% NaOH+methanol, and NaOH have been used in previous studies [12, 26, 42] and thus selected and tested in MBC regeneration study. The CIP removal efficiency of MBC after first cycle desorption with 0.3 M NaOH, methanol, 3% NaOH+methanol, and 0.3 M HCl was 72.7, 47.09, 67.96, and 93.56%, respectively. Hence, 0.3 M HCl was used as an eluent for CIP desorption throughout the regeneration study. After 5 sequential adsorption/desorption cycles, the removal of CIP by MBC varied from 95.68% to 88.13% (reduction of 7.55%) as shown in Figure 6. The reusability studies revealed that 88% of CIP can be removed even in the fifth cycle suggesting enhanced stability and reusability of MBC. The reusability of the MBC without significant loss in CIP removal is one of the benefits of this process regarding environmental concerns and economic feasibility.Figure 6
CIP removal efficiency of MBC per each usage cycle.


### 3.7. Comparison of MBC with Other Sorbents

The maximum adsorption capacity of MBC was 78.43 mg g-1. The high adsorption capacity of MBC can be ascribed to the cooperative adsorption mechanism between CIP molecules and MBC. Table 7 summarizes the CIP adsorption capacity reported for various sorbents.Table 7
CIP removal efficiencies of various adsorbents.
AdsorbentCapacity (maximum uptake)Operational conditionsIsotherm and kinetics data best fit models% CIP removal (max)ReferencesAzolla filiculoides activated carbon35.14 mg g-1CIP=10 mg L-1, adsorbent dose=2.5 g L-1, and contact time=75 minLangmuir isotherm model99.1Balarak, et al. [1]NiO (synthesized)Adsorbentdose=1 g L-1, pH=3, contact time=90 min, and 50°CPseudo-second-order kinetic model99.2Balarak, et al. [1]Amine-functionalized mobil composition of matter no. 41 (MCM–41) mesoporous silica nanoparticle164.3 mg g-1pH=7, adsorbent dose = 0.8 g L-1, CIP concentration=10 mg/L, adsorption time=120 min, and shaking speed=200 rpmLangmuir isotherm model and pseudo-second-order model99.25Abu Rumman et al. [10]Activated carbon from Lemna minor plant magnetized with iron(III) oxide magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4-ACLM)178.7 mg g-1 at 50°CCIP=25 mg L-1, pH=3, Fe3O4−ACLM=0.75g L-1, contact time=75 min, and 50°CLangmuir isotherm model100Yilmaz et al. [79]γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles—pH=7.5, initial CIP=20 mg L-1, adsorbent dose=0.775, and contact time=46.25 minTemkin isotherm model and pseudo-second-order kinetic model53Asghar et al. [59]Multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNTs/Al2O3)41.73 mg g-1pH=7, MWCNTs/Al2O3=1.2 g L-1, contact time=60 min, initial CIP con=10 mg L-1, and 50°CLangmuir isotherm model—Balarak & Mckay [11]Powdered activated carbon magnetized by iron(III)oxide nanoparticles (PAC@Fe3O4-MN)109.833 mg g-1pH=7, PAC@Fe3O4-MN dose=1 g L-1, shaking speed=200 rpm, initial CIP=100 mg/L, contact time=60 min, and temperature=298 KFilm diffusion—Al et al. [26]Magnetic chalcogenide composite (KMS-1/L-cysteine/Fe3O4 (KCF)181.32 mg g-1pH=6Pseudo-second-order kinetic model—Wang et al. [69]Biochar derived from copyrolysis of sewage sludge and bamboo waste62.48 mg g-1—Pseudo-second-order, Freundlich, and Langmuir model95Li et al. [56]Herbal residue biochar43.668 mg g-1—Pseudo-second-order kinetics modelShang et al. [72]Activated carbon coated with multiwalled carbon nanotubes—pH=7, contact time=30 min, adsorbent dosage=20 mg L-1, temperature=40°C, and initial CIP=20 mg L-1Pseudo-second-order and Freundlich isotherm100Sharifpour et al. [78]Magnetic polyaniline/graphene oxide-based nanocomposites—pH=6, adsorbent dosage=1 g L-1, CIP=50 mg L-1, and contact time = 30 minFreundlich model and pseudo-second-order kinetics97Kazem et al. [80]Low-cost hydrogel derived from agrowaste106.038 mg g-1Adsorbentdose=1.0 g L-1, contact time=300 min, and pH=7Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order model—Nguyen et al. [81]Iron oxide/cellulose magnetic recyclable nanocomposite168.03 mg g-1pH=7, CIP concentration=15 mg L-1, adsorbent dosage=20 mg L-1, and contact time=40 minLangmuir isotherm and pseudo-first-order kinetic model92.01Azizi [2]Oat hulls83 mg g-1—Freundlich isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic mode—Movasaghi et al. [4]Chitosan/biochar hydrogel beads (CBHB)76 mg g-1Langmuir and pseudo-second-order kinetics—Afzal et al. [82]Magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgO)3.46 mg g-1—Langmuir adsorption isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic model85Khoshnamvand et al. [73]Humic acid modified hydrogel beads154.89 mg g-1CIPconcentration=250 mg L-1Langmuir isotherm model and pseudo-second-order kinetic model—Zaheer et al. [83]Magnetic chalcogenide composite, KMS-1/L-cysteine/Fe3O4 (KCF)181.32 mg g-1pH=6Pseudo-second-order kinetic model and Langmuir adsorption isotherm model—Wang et al. [69]Tannin foam immobilized with ferric ions91.8 mg g-1pH=7.0Pseudo-second-order rate model and Langmuir model96.60Hao et al. [84]Surfactant modified sepiolite63.84 mg g-1CIP=10 mg L-1 and adsorbent dosage=2 g L-1Pseudo-second-order model99.1Balarak et al. [85]Modified bamboo biochar (MBC)78.43 mg g-1Adsorbentdose=0.5 g L-1, CIP=20 mg L-1, pH=7.5, and contact time=46.25 minPseudo-second-order rate model and Langmuir model96This studyThe use of adsorbents for the effective removal of emerging pollutants such as pharmaceutical contaminants from water is a promising technology. In this study, MBC was found to be effective for the removal of pharmaceutical contaminants such as ciprofloxacin from wastewater. Compared to others, MBC has shown higher adsorption efficiency at a relatively lower dose and less contact time for higher pollutant concentration. The adsorbent (MBC) can be synthesized from cheap and easily available raw materials promoting the circular economy. Another benefit of MBC is the simplicity of the preparation steps compared to other adsorbents having complex synthesis steps. Moreover, MBC can be easily separated from the solution by filtration or magnetic separation. For practical water remediation applications, issues related to biochar applications in water such as the release of poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) need to be considered. In this regard, the biochar has to meet certification requirements at the commercial scale before being applied in practical water treatment processes as presented in the recent work on biochar production and certification [86]. Future research works need to focus on the effect of real wastewater matrix, type of the activated biochar (granular or powder), and chemical activation after pyrolysis on the removal of CIP using MBC.


### 3.8. Adsorption Mechanism

According to the FTIR analysis, it can be concluded that the -OH groups, C-H groups in aromatic rings, C-O alkyne, phenolic C-O bonds, and Fe-O-Fe detected on the surface of MBC may have played a significant role in the CIP adsorption process. This indicates that MBC mainly consists of aromatics, andπ-π donor-acceptor interactions may occur during adsorption [8]. The graphitic and aromatic nature of the biochar provides electron-rich π clouds, which act as π donors. Hence, the π-π electron-donor-acceptor (EDA) interaction occurs between the biochar and electron-deficient moieties of CIP (π acceptors), enhancing the overall adsorption process. In CIP adsorption using MBC (pHpzc=6.5), at low pH values (less than pKa1=6.1), the surface functional groups and unsaturated arene groups of the MBC were protonated; thus, the π electron donor interaction with CIP was minimum. However, when pH increases from 6.1 to 8.7 (pKa2), CIP becomes zwitterionic and capable of acting as both π donor and acceptor, promoting interactions with the biochar surface [67]. Moreover, the –OH and –COOH groups on the MBC surface may form hydrogen bonding with moieties such as N- and F-containing groups on the CIP molecules.Furthermore, ion exchange may happen in the adsorption process. The piperazine rings of CIP molecules were positively charged (NH2+) in neutral or faintly acid solution, and the CIP+ may be attracted by the polar and alkaline surface of biochar with H+ releasing [56]. Also, a complexation reaction between the Fe on the biochar and CIP molecules might be another removal mechanism [56]. The Fe species probably produce hydrous oxide on the surface of biochar, and one O of the carboxylate group in the CIP molecule may bind with the hydrous oxide surface. The reason may be that the CIP molecule forms a six-membered ring with an Fe atom through one O of the carboxylate group and keto O [87]. The complexation reaction probably occurs between the ketone or carboxylate functional groups of zwitterions, CIP, and Fe2O3 of the biochar. The O atom in the carboxylic group of CIP zwitterions has been reported with a more potent ligand to interact with Fe3+ [88]. The iron species on the surface of MBC may have enhanced CIP adsorption through a complexation reaction. In fact, the adsorbent screening test revealed that bamboo biochar modified solely with ferric chloride has higher CIP removal efficiency (67.38%) than the unmodified or raw bamboo biochar (45.01%), suggesting that the iron species were involved in the CIP adsorption process. This can be supported by the disappearance of the peak assigned to the iron species on the FTIR spectra after adsorption.


## 3.1. Characterization of Biochar

### 3.1.1. FTIR Analysis

The FTIR spectra of unmodified biochar (UMC), modified biochar (MBC), and modified biochar after CIP adsorption (MBC-CIP) and CIP are presented in Figure1. In MBC, new peaks appeared at 3543–3456 cm-1 (broad peak), 2918–2835 cm-1, 2250–2000 cm-1, and 1052 cm-1, which were assigned to the stretching vibrations of –OH (hydroxyl or carboxyl groups [54], C-H (asymmetrically and symmetrically stretching vibrations of aliphatic), C ≡ O (alkyne), and C-O (carboxylic acid and esters), respectively. The dehydration of biochar (chemically treated) sample during the carbonation process resulted in the O-H vibration stretching of water molecules [26]. Additionally, the new peak emerged in MBC at 540 cm−1 shows Fe-O-Fe stretching vibration, indicating that iron oxide was successfully supported on the biochar surface [26, 62]. Thus, the FTIR spectra result showed that the surface of MBC contained rich oxygen-containing groups and aromatic structures, which provided favorable conditions for CIP adsorption.Figure 1
FTIR spectra of unmodified (UBC), modified biochar (MBC), modified biochar after adsorption (MBC-CIP), and ciprofloxacin (CIP).After CIP adsorption onto MBC (CIP-MBC), as shown in Figure1, the peaks observed in MBC at 3500, 2872, and 1052 cm-1 were shifted to 3407, 2917, and 1018 cm-1, respectively. On the other hand, the peaks observed at 2188 and 540 disappeared after adsorption. Moreover, the new narrow peak (2920 cm-1) that appeared on MBC-CIP is similar to the peak observed in CIP (2920 cm-1). The intensity of the peak observed in MBC after adsorption (MBC-CIP) at 3400 cm-1 is similar to the intensity of the peak at 3500 cm-1 in CIP. Hence, it is evident that the –OH, C-H, C-O, C ≡ O, and Fe-O groups observed on MBC were involved in the CIP adsorption process. The presence of several functional groups on the surface of MBC played an important role in CIP removal from aqueous solution via electrostatic interactions, complexation reaction, π-π EDA interactions, and hydrogen bonding [47].


### 3.1.2. BET Surface Area

The BET surface area of MBC (1158.050 m2 g-1) was remarkably higher than that of UBC (565.095 m2 g-1). This result indicated that simultaneous activation of bamboo sawdust with ferric chloride and potassium hydroxide enhanced the surface area of the biochar significantly. The increase in surface area may be attributed to the formation of new pores and the opening of initially inaccessible pores during the chemical activation process, which would help develop a more porous structure [54]. The surface area is an important parameter that plays a significant role in physical adsorption. The higher surface area of the material leads to higher adsorption of the pollutant due to the availability of many adsorption sites for more organic pollutant removal [54]. Accordingly, MBC is expected to have higher removal of CIP molecules from aqueous solutions than the UBC.


### 3.1.3. XRD

The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) (XRD; Rigaku MiniFlex 600 Benchtop) was conducted to investigate the crystalline compositions of the bamboo biochars. The XRD analysis result is shown in Figure2. The peaks at 30.1, 35.6, 43.2, and 57.2 are assigned to magnetite [63], whereas the peak observed in MBC at 33.2 is assigned to hematite. The emergence of these peaks on the surface of MBC confirmed the presence of Fe-O in the structure of the modified biochar adsorbent. Al et al. [26] detected a peak at a similar angular degree for Fe3O4 cubic crystals on an adsorbent prepared from powdered activated carbon magnetized by iron(III) oxide magnetic nanoparticles.Figure 2
XRD patterns of raw and modified biochars.Iron (Fe) was believed to be present on the surface of modified biochar (MBC) as indicated by characteristic peaks of magnetite and hematite [64–66]. The XRD result revealed that Fe was successfully loaded onto the MBC, which is consistent with the findings of the FTIR analysis. Therefore, the chemical modification of the biochar has desirable structural changes on the biochar, as evidenced by the XRD plot.


### 3.1.4. Point of Zero Charge (pHpzc)

DeterminingpHpzc is essential for the adsorption process study as the adsorption mechanism strongly depends on the solution pH. The point of zero charge of MBC is about 6.5, as shown in FigureS1. Based on the pHpzc result, the surface of MBC is positively charged when pH is below 6.5 and negatively charged when pH is above 6.5. At pH below 6.0, ciprofloxacin is mainly present in its cationic form [54], and the surface of the MBC is positively charged. Hence, the adsorbent and ciprofloxacin molecules repel each other, and thus, CIP removal efficiency decreased. Increasing pH above 6.1 changes the CIP molecule from cationic to zwitterionic leading to a gradual increase in CIP adsorption [67]. Due to the strong electrostatic interaction between MBC and CIP zwitterion (pH 6.0-8.7), maximum adsorption was obtained.In contrast, at pH higher than 8.7, the adsorption process efficiency decreased as the repulsive force increased between the negatively charged MBC surface and anionic CIP molecules [59]. Similar results were obtained by Asghar et al. [59] in removing ciprofloxacin from water using γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles. Consistently, Ji et al. [28] reported similar results with a pH range (6–8) as an optimal condition for titanate nanotubes to remove CIP molecules.


## 3.1.1. FTIR Analysis

The FTIR spectra of unmodified biochar (UMC), modified biochar (MBC), and modified biochar after CIP adsorption (MBC-CIP) and CIP are presented in Figure1. In MBC, new peaks appeared at 3543–3456 cm-1 (broad peak), 2918–2835 cm-1, 2250–2000 cm-1, and 1052 cm-1, which were assigned to the stretching vibrations of –OH (hydroxyl or carboxyl groups [54], C-H (asymmetrically and symmetrically stretching vibrations of aliphatic), C ≡ O (alkyne), and C-O (carboxylic acid and esters), respectively. The dehydration of biochar (chemically treated) sample during the carbonation process resulted in the O-H vibration stretching of water molecules [26]. Additionally, the new peak emerged in MBC at 540 cm−1 shows Fe-O-Fe stretching vibration, indicating that iron oxide was successfully supported on the biochar surface [26, 62]. Thus, the FTIR spectra result showed that the surface of MBC contained rich oxygen-containing groups and aromatic structures, which provided favorable conditions for CIP adsorption.Figure 1
FTIR spectra of unmodified (UBC), modified biochar (MBC), modified biochar after adsorption (MBC-CIP), and ciprofloxacin (CIP).After CIP adsorption onto MBC (CIP-MBC), as shown in Figure1, the peaks observed in MBC at 3500, 2872, and 1052 cm-1 were shifted to 3407, 2917, and 1018 cm-1, respectively. On the other hand, the peaks observed at 2188 and 540 disappeared after adsorption. Moreover, the new narrow peak (2920 cm-1) that appeared on MBC-CIP is similar to the peak observed in CIP (2920 cm-1). The intensity of the peak observed in MBC after adsorption (MBC-CIP) at 3400 cm-1 is similar to the intensity of the peak at 3500 cm-1 in CIP. Hence, it is evident that the –OH, C-H, C-O, C ≡ O, and Fe-O groups observed on MBC were involved in the CIP adsorption process. The presence of several functional groups on the surface of MBC played an important role in CIP removal from aqueous solution via electrostatic interactions, complexation reaction, π-π EDA interactions, and hydrogen bonding [47].


## 3.1.2. BET Surface Area

The BET surface area of MBC (1158.050 m2 g-1) was remarkably higher than that of UBC (565.095 m2 g-1). This result indicated that simultaneous activation of bamboo sawdust with ferric chloride and potassium hydroxide enhanced the surface area of the biochar significantly. The increase in surface area may be attributed to the formation of new pores and the opening of initially inaccessible pores during the chemical activation process, which would help develop a more porous structure [54]. The surface area is an important parameter that plays a significant role in physical adsorption. The higher surface area of the material leads to higher adsorption of the pollutant due to the availability of many adsorption sites for more organic pollutant removal [54]. Accordingly, MBC is expected to have higher removal of CIP molecules from aqueous solutions than the UBC.


## 3.1.3. XRD

The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) (XRD; Rigaku MiniFlex 600 Benchtop) was conducted to investigate the crystalline compositions of the bamboo biochars. The XRD analysis result is shown in Figure2. The peaks at 30.1, 35.6, 43.2, and 57.2 are assigned to magnetite [63], whereas the peak observed in MBC at 33.2 is assigned to hematite. The emergence of these peaks on the surface of MBC confirmed the presence of Fe-O in the structure of the modified biochar adsorbent. Al et al. [26] detected a peak at a similar angular degree for Fe3O4 cubic crystals on an adsorbent prepared from powdered activated carbon magnetized by iron(III) oxide magnetic nanoparticles.Figure 2
XRD patterns of raw and modified biochars.Iron (Fe) was believed to be present on the surface of modified biochar (MBC) as indicated by characteristic peaks of magnetite and hematite [64–66]. The XRD result revealed that Fe was successfully loaded onto the MBC, which is consistent with the findings of the FTIR analysis. Therefore, the chemical modification of the biochar has desirable structural changes on the biochar, as evidenced by the XRD plot.


## 3.1.4. Point of Zero Charge (pHpzc)

DeterminingpHpzc is essential for the adsorption process study as the adsorption mechanism strongly depends on the solution pH. The point of zero charge of MBC is about 6.5, as shown in FigureS1. Based on the pHpzc result, the surface of MBC is positively charged when pH is below 6.5 and negatively charged when pH is above 6.5. At pH below 6.0, ciprofloxacin is mainly present in its cationic form [54], and the surface of the MBC is positively charged. Hence, the adsorbent and ciprofloxacin molecules repel each other, and thus, CIP removal efficiency decreased. Increasing pH above 6.1 changes the CIP molecule from cationic to zwitterionic leading to a gradual increase in CIP adsorption [67]. Due to the strong electrostatic interaction between MBC and CIP zwitterion (pH 6.0-8.7), maximum adsorption was obtained.In contrast, at pH higher than 8.7, the adsorption process efficiency decreased as the repulsive force increased between the negatively charged MBC surface and anionic CIP molecules [59]. Similar results were obtained by Asghar et al. [59] in removing ciprofloxacin from water using γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles. Consistently, Ji et al. [28] reported similar results with a pH range (6–8) as an optimal condition for titanate nanotubes to remove CIP molecules.


## 3.2. Adsorption of CIP onto MBC Adsorbent

In this work, different bamboo-based adsorbents, unmodified bamboo biochar (UBC), bamboo biochar modified with ferric chloride (FBC), bamboo biochar modified with potassium hydroxide (KMBC), and bamboo biochar modified with both ferric chloride and potassium hydroxide (MBC), were prepared. The CIP removal efficiencies and adsorption capacities of the as-synthesized bamboo-based adsorbents are shown in Table2. MBC was prepared chemically by modifying the bamboo sawdust with ferric chloride and potassium hydroxide at the same time as depicted in Section 2.2. As shown in Table 2, the UBC, FMBC, KMBC, and MBC gave 45.01, 67.38, 79.45, and 95.67% CIP removal, respectively. This experiment was conducted at CIP initial concentration (25 mg L-1), adsorbent dose (0.5 g L-1), contact time (46.25 min), and pH (7.0). The result indicated that modification of the bamboo by KOH, FeCl3, or KOH/FeCl3 has resulted in increased CIP removal. The high adsorption capacity can be ascribed to the high surface area of the adsorbent (1158.05 m2g-1) and the strong interaction of CIP molecules with MBC surface functional groups.Table 2
Adsorbent screening test for CIP removal.
AdsorbentShort name% CIP removalDecisionUnmodified bamboo biocharUBC45.01Not selectedFerric chloride modified bamboo biocharFMBC67.38Not selectedPotassium hydroxide modified bamboo biocharKMBC79.45Not selectedFerric chloride+potassium hydroxide modified bamboo biocharMBC95.67Selected∗Experimental condition: CIP initial concentration: 25 mg L-1, adsorbent dose: 0.5 g L-1, time: 46.25 min, and pH: 7.0.MBC has remarkably superior adsorption capacity (78.43 mg g-1) than all other bamboo-based adsorbents (UBC, FMBC, and KMBC). This may be attributed to the collaborative effect of both KOH and FeCl3 activation. Fe-O group was detected on the surface of the MBC as confirmed by XRD and FTIR spectra analysis. The high adsorption performance observed for KOH/FeCl3 modified adsorbent is may be due to the formation of Fe-O sorption sites [48–51] in addition to the formation of -OH, C-H, C-O, and C ≡ O functional groups. Iron functional groups may form a complex reaction with CIP zwitterions increasing CIP removal from aqueous solution. Hence, MBC (bamboo biochar with combined modification) was selected and used as the best adsorbent throughout this study. The adsorbent has magnetic properties because of iron which may help during the separation of the adsorbent.


### 3.2.1. Model Fitting and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Using CCD

The central composite design (CCD) was used to optimize the CIP adsorption process parameters. The CCD experimental design of CIP adsorption data is presented in TableS1. The second-order polynomial model fitted the experimental data of CIP adsorption onto MBC. The suggested quadratic model’s R2 and adjusted R2 were 0.9876 and 0.9820, respectively. ANOVA was used to assess the validity and adequacy of the model and determine the effect of main factors and possible interaction factors. ANOVA indicated that the suggested polynomial model was statistically significant. The result of the ANOVA analysis is presented in Table 3. As shown in Table 3, the F and p values of the model were 229.46 and <0.0001, respectively. There is only a 0.01% chance that an F value this large could occur due to noise. A, B, C, D, AB, BD, CD, B2, and C2 are significant model terms from the ANOVA table. Hence, all the independent variables (initial CIP concentration, pH, contact time, and adsorbent dosage) significantly affected the CIP removal. Both Yousefi et al. and Asghar et al. reported similar findings for the CIP removal using magnetization of functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes and γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles as an adsorbent, respectively [9, 59]. In their studies, adsorption parameters including initial CIP concentration, pH, contact time, and adsorbent dose were significant in CIP removal from an aqueous solution.Table 3
ANOVA results of the CIP adsorption onto MBC.
SourceSum of squaresdfMean squareF valuep valueModel4671.169519.02229.46<0.0001SignificantA-initial CIP con787.421787.42348.12<0.0001B-adsorbent dose2224.3412224.34983.38<0.0001C-pH144.011144.0163.67<0.0001D-contact time691.761691.76305.83<0.0001AB326.801326.80144.48<0.0001BD129.791129.7957.38<0.0001CD138.471138.4761.22<0.0001B2150.601150.6066.58<0.0001C2102.791102.7945.45<0.0001Residual45.24202.26Lack of fit37.98152.531.740.2806Not significantPure error7.2651.45Cor total4716.4029df: degree of freedom.Model terms withp values less than 0.05 are significant, and terms with p values higher than 0.05 are not significant. Relative to pure error, the lack of fit is not significant, as indicated by the lack of fit F value of 1.74. There is a 28.06% chance that a lack of fit F value this large could occur due to noise. As a result, a lack of fit that is not significant is desired since we want the model to fit the CIP experimental data well. Adeq precision measures the signal-to-noise ratio, and a value greater than 4 is desirable. In this design, the ratio of 56.593 indicates an adequate signal. This model can be used to navigate the design space successfully.Based on the CCD statistical analysis, the final predicted model equation in terms of coded factors is expressed in Equation (19) with significant factors (main and interaction). In Equation (19), A, B, C, and D are the coded values of initial ciprofloxacin concentration, adsorbent dose, pH, and contact time, respectively, whereas AB, BD, and CD are the significant interaction parameters.
(19)CIPRemoval=89.49−5.73A+9.63B−2.45C+5.37D+4.52AB−2.85BD+2.94CD−2.30B2−1.90C2.The influence of each factor on the removal of CIP can be seen from their coefficients in Equation (19). The coefficients of each factor are -5.73, 9.63, -2.45, and 5.37, respectively, confirming that A and C have a negative effect, whereas B and D have a positive effect on the CIP removal. The results displayed in Table 3 indicated that the influence of each parameter on the CIP removal followed the order: B > A > D > C, which is in agreement with the results described in Equation (19). Notably, the adsorbent dose and the initial concentration of CIP had the most significant effect on the CIP removal process. Also, the final equation in terms of the actual factors for CIP adsorption onto MBC is presented in
(20)CIPRemoval=75.058−1.92∗initialCIP+1328.55∗adsorbentdose+1.45∗pH+0.29∗contacttime+36.15∗initilalCIP∗adsorbentdose−16.57∗adsorbentdose∗contacttime+0.09∗pH∗contacttime−14726.5∗adsorbentdose2−0.37∗pH2.According to the model fit statistics, the regression parameters such as the coefficient of determination (R2), adjusted coefficient of determination, and predicted determination coefficients are 0.9876, 0.9820, and 0.9670, respectively. Thus, the model represents 98% of the variation in the CIP removal response. The values of model regression parameters indicate proper fitness of the model as shown in Table 2. Using the CCD experimental design, Asghar et al. reported similar model fit statistics values (R2=0.96) for the CIP adsorption [59].Diagnostic plots such as externally studentized residuals against predicted, predicted against actual, and the normal probability against externally studentized residuals were analyzed to assess the model’s adequacy. These results are presented in FigureS2(a)-S2(c). The normal probability against externally studentized residual plot shown in Figure S2(a) indicated that all the points are close to the straight line, showing that the error was normally distributed. From the plot of predicted against actual shown in Figure S2(b), it can be seen that the predicted values are well correlated with the actual (experimental) values, and the model predicted data were not significantly different from the experimental results. The highest residual (difference between actual and predicted) is 2.93 for the CIP removal of 88.35%. In a plot of externally studentized residuals against predicted shown in Figure S2(c), the residuals were randomly distributed between +3.00 and −3.00, indicating that the CCD model successfully established the relationship between the independent variable and the CIP removal [68]. Overall, the diagnostic plot results agree with the coefficient of determination values of the model. Thus, the quadratic model suggested by CCD experimental design described the experimental CIP adsorption data adequately.


### 3.2.2. Effect of Individual Process Variables

The effect of the adsorption process variables such as pH, initial CIP concentration, adsorbent dose, and contact time on CIP removal was investigated. FigureS3(a)-S3(d) displays the one factor plots for each main factor. These include initial CIP concentration, adsorbent dose, pH, and contact time.(1) Effect of CIP Initial Concentration. The effect of initial CIP concentration on the adsorption efficiency was investigated. Figure S3(a) depicted that increasing the CIP initial concentration from 10 to 40 mg L-1 decreased the CIP removal efficiency from 100 to 75.52% at pH (7.5), adsorbent dose (0.5 g L-1), and contact time (46.25 min). In line with this result, Yousefi et al. reported that increasing the CIP concentration from 30 to 100 mg L-1 decreased CIP removal efficiency from 83% to 59% [9]. On the other hand, Wang et al. investigated the effect of the initial CIP concentration (10–200 mg L-1) at pH (6) and adsorbent dosage (135 mg L-1) on the adsorption capacity. In their study, the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent for cationic CIP increased very quickly for CIP initial concentration of less than 50 mg L-1 and then decreased with the increase of CIP initial concentration above 50 mg L-1 [69]. Hence, an increase in CIP initial concentration decreased the removal efficiency. This may be attributed to the lack of available sites on the adsorbent for the uptake of high CIP concentration [70]. In this study, unlike the case for CIP percentage removal, the CIP adsorption capacity increased from 20 mg g-1 to 60 mg g-1 by increasing the initial CIP concentration from 10 to 40 mg L-1. This is due to the reduction of the resistance to CIP uptake from the aqueous solution. Moreover, the higher initial CIP concentration provides a driving force to overcome the mass transfer resistance of the CIP between the solid and aqueous phases [70].(2) Effect of Adsorbent Dose. The adsorbent dose has a significant effect on the CIP removal from an aqueous solution. As depicted in Figure S3(b), using an adsorbent dose of 0.25 g L-1 at pH 7.5, 30 mg L-1 initial CIP concentration, and 46.25 min contact time resulted in 96.02% CIP removal, whereas using an adsorbent dose of 1.0 g L-1 at similar adsorption conditions almost completely removed CIP from the solution. A similar adsorption trend was observed by Gulen and Demircivi [71] in the adsorption of CIP from water using a 2: 1 dioctahedral clay structure with the increase of CIP adsorption from 1.8% (0.034 g L-1) to 99.2% (2 g L-1). Moreover, Shang et al. reported a significant increase in the CIP removal efficiency from 36 to 100%, for an increase in adsorbent (herbal residue biochar) dosage from 0.025 to 0.5 g L-1 [72]. The increase in the percentage of CIP removal with an increase in adsorbent dose is because of the increase of available active sites, which enhanced the CIP uptake [59, 73].(3) Effect of pH. The pH of the solution is an important parameter of adsorption processes because it affects the surface nature of the adsorbent and adsorbate-adsorbent interactions [59]. At pH less than pKa1 (6.1), the amine group in piperazine moiety receives a proton, and CIP+ appears. However, for pH above pKa2 (8.7), CIP occurs in anionic form (CIP−) due to amine group deprotonation. At pH between pKa1 and pKa2 of CIP, the CIP molecule exists in zwitterionic form due to the charge balance of the amine and carboxylic groups [9, 74]. Figure S3(c) depicted that the CIP removal efficiency of MBC increased by increasing the pH of the solution from 5.25 to 7.5 and then decreased with any further increase in pH. Hence, increasing pH from 5.25 to 7.5 at fixed initial CIP concentration (20 mg L-1), adsorbent dose (0.5 g L-1), and contact time (46.25 min) increased the CIP removal from 93.62% to 96.02%. Further elevation of pH to 9.75 reduced the CIP removal to 94.61%. Thus, the optimal pH for CIP adsorption onto the MBC is 7.5. This pH level is very important since ciprofloxacin forms zwitterion and that led to the strong electrostatic attraction between CIP and negatively charged MBC. Hence, maximum adsorption was obtained at this pH level. Dehghan et al. [75] observed a similar adsorption trend for the CIP using a metal-organic framework (MOF). They reported that an increase in pH from 3 to 7.5 increased the adsorption of CIP onto MOF. However, at pH values above 7.5, CIP adsorption decreased. The reason for this adsorption behavior can be attributed to protonation–deprotonation reactions in groups of CIP molecules [75].(4) Effect of Contact Time. Contact time is one of the significant factors in the adsorption of the CIP onto the MBC in this work. As shown in Figure S3(d), adsorption at an adsorbent dose (0.5 g L-1), pH (7.5), CIP initial concentration (20 mg L-1), and the contact time (18.75 min) resulted in 79.58% of CIP removal. However, CIP removal efficiency increased to 96.02% under similar adsorption conditions when the contact time increased to 46.25 min. Moreover, Figure S4 showed that the adsorption rate was rapid in the first 30 minutes and moderate in 30-70 minutes. This may be attributed to the availability of abundant free active sites on MBC at the initial adsorption stage for CIP sorption. The rate became very slow after 70 minutes, and no appreciable CIP removal was achieved. Hence, equilibrium was reached at about 70 min. The number of available active sites decreases with time, and eventually, the adsorbent becomes saturated [70]. For CIP adsorption process, optimization and adsorption experiments were conducted using the contact time range (less than 60 min), which is intentionally taken to fully investigate the effect of contact time and its interaction effects. Increasing the contact time allowed CIP molecules to reach the active sites of the adsorbent up to equilibrium time. Beyond the equilibrium time, no significant uptake of CIP took place as depicted in Figure S4.


### 3.2.3. Interaction Effects of Process Variables

Response surface methodology is a powerful tool with important features for evaluating the interactive effect of variables. In this study, 3D surface plots (Figures3(a)–3(c)) were employed to study the interaction effects on the CIP removal. The significant interaction effects include initial CIP concentration-adsorbent dose, adsorbent dose-contact time, and pH-contact time.Figure 3
Interaction effects: (a) adsorbent dose versus CIP initial concentration, (b) contact time versus adsorbent dose, and (c) contact time versus pH.
(a)(b)(c)(1) CIP Initial Concentration and Adsorbent Dose Interaction Effect. The interaction effect of CIP initial concentration and the adsorbent dose was shown in Figure 3(a). The interaction effect of CIP initial concentration and the adsorbent dose was positively significant. From the 3D plot, it was observed that the CIP removal was highest at the initial CIP concentration range of 20-25 mg L-1 and adsorbent dose range of 0.75–1.0 g L-1. The enhanced removal of CIP at the higher MBC dose was due to higher active sites for CIP adsorption [76].(2) Adsorbent Dose and Contact Time Interaction Effect. The interaction effect of MBC dose and the contact time on CIP removal is displayed using a 3D plot in Figure 3(b). CIP removal was highest at the MBC dose of 0.75-1.0 g L-1 and at the reaction time of 40-46 min. This study revealed that CIP removal increased with an increase in contact time and adsorbent dose. This is may be attributed to the availability of more active sites with adsorbent dose increment and enough contact time for MBC and CIP molecules to interact with each other [76].(3) pH and Contact Time Interaction Effect. The interaction effect of pH and contact time on CIP removal is shown in Figure 3(c). The percentage of CIP removal increased with an increase in contact time. A kinetic study showed that the adsorption rate was rapid in the first 30 minutes and became slow after 30 minutes. The CIP adsorption is strongly dependent on the pH of the solution. CIP exists in zwitterion form at pH between 6.1 and 8.7, and the electrostatic interaction between CIP and MBC is strong. The point of zero charge of MBC was 6.5, and for pH less than 6.1 and beyond 8.7, the repulsive forces became dominant, and less CIP removal was achieved. Thus, this pH range is an optimum pH level for the highest CIP removal. Figure 3(c) depicted that when pH decreased from 9.75 to 5.25 with an increase in contact time from 18.75 to 46.25 min, the CIP removal increased from 71.88 to 93.62%. In contrast, an increase in pH and a decrease in contact time decreased CIP removal. The reverse of this condition decreased the CIP removal. This showed that contact time had a superior influence on CIP removal than pH for interaction effects. However, for an increase in pH and contact time from 5.25 and 18.75 min to 9.75 and 46.25 min, CIP removal increased from 83.07 to 94.61%, respectively. Maximum CIP removal (96.02) was obtained at pH (7.5) and contact time (46.25 min) using MBC adsorbent.


### 3.2.4. Process Optimization

The optimization approach followed in CCD design to obtain the best operating conditions was by minimizing the adsorbent dosage, taking the initial CIP concentration in the range, pH in the range, and contact time in the range, and by maximizing CIP removal. Based on this criterion, the optimal condition that gave maximum CIP removal efficiency (96.02%) using the MBC adsorbent was pH (7.5), adsorbent (0.5 g L-1), contact time (46.257 min), and initial CIP concentration (20 mg L-1) with a good desirability value of 0.971. Adsorption tests were conducted at these optimum conditions to confirm the model’s credibility. Accordingly, CIP removal values of 95.68, 96.42, and 96.24 were obtained, and the mean value of these results is 96.11%. Thus, the model predicted CIP removal (96%) is close to the experimental value obtained (96.11%), showing that the model is valid.


## 3.2.1. Model Fitting and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Using CCD

The central composite design (CCD) was used to optimize the CIP adsorption process parameters. The CCD experimental design of CIP adsorption data is presented in TableS1. The second-order polynomial model fitted the experimental data of CIP adsorption onto MBC. The suggested quadratic model’s R2 and adjusted R2 were 0.9876 and 0.9820, respectively. ANOVA was used to assess the validity and adequacy of the model and determine the effect of main factors and possible interaction factors. ANOVA indicated that the suggested polynomial model was statistically significant. The result of the ANOVA analysis is presented in Table 3. As shown in Table 3, the F and p values of the model were 229.46 and <0.0001, respectively. There is only a 0.01% chance that an F value this large could occur due to noise. A, B, C, D, AB, BD, CD, B2, and C2 are significant model terms from the ANOVA table. Hence, all the independent variables (initial CIP concentration, pH, contact time, and adsorbent dosage) significantly affected the CIP removal. Both Yousefi et al. and Asghar et al. reported similar findings for the CIP removal using magnetization of functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes and γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles as an adsorbent, respectively [9, 59]. In their studies, adsorption parameters including initial CIP concentration, pH, contact time, and adsorbent dose were significant in CIP removal from an aqueous solution.Table 3
ANOVA results of the CIP adsorption onto MBC.
SourceSum of squaresdfMean squareF valuep valueModel4671.169519.02229.46<0.0001SignificantA-initial CIP con787.421787.42348.12<0.0001B-adsorbent dose2224.3412224.34983.38<0.0001C-pH144.011144.0163.67<0.0001D-contact time691.761691.76305.83<0.0001AB326.801326.80144.48<0.0001BD129.791129.7957.38<0.0001CD138.471138.4761.22<0.0001B2150.601150.6066.58<0.0001C2102.791102.7945.45<0.0001Residual45.24202.26Lack of fit37.98152.531.740.2806Not significantPure error7.2651.45Cor total4716.4029df: degree of freedom.Model terms withp values less than 0.05 are significant, and terms with p values higher than 0.05 are not significant. Relative to pure error, the lack of fit is not significant, as indicated by the lack of fit F value of 1.74. There is a 28.06% chance that a lack of fit F value this large could occur due to noise. As a result, a lack of fit that is not significant is desired since we want the model to fit the CIP experimental data well. Adeq precision measures the signal-to-noise ratio, and a value greater than 4 is desirable. In this design, the ratio of 56.593 indicates an adequate signal. This model can be used to navigate the design space successfully.Based on the CCD statistical analysis, the final predicted model equation in terms of coded factors is expressed in Equation (19) with significant factors (main and interaction). In Equation (19), A, B, C, and D are the coded values of initial ciprofloxacin concentration, adsorbent dose, pH, and contact time, respectively, whereas AB, BD, and CD are the significant interaction parameters.
(19)CIPRemoval=89.49−5.73A+9.63B−2.45C+5.37D+4.52AB−2.85BD+2.94CD−2.30B2−1.90C2.The influence of each factor on the removal of CIP can be seen from their coefficients in Equation (19). The coefficients of each factor are -5.73, 9.63, -2.45, and 5.37, respectively, confirming that A and C have a negative effect, whereas B and D have a positive effect on the CIP removal. The results displayed in Table 3 indicated that the influence of each parameter on the CIP removal followed the order: B > A > D > C, which is in agreement with the results described in Equation (19). Notably, the adsorbent dose and the initial concentration of CIP had the most significant effect on the CIP removal process. Also, the final equation in terms of the actual factors for CIP adsorption onto MBC is presented in
(20)CIPRemoval=75.058−1.92∗initialCIP+1328.55∗adsorbentdose+1.45∗pH+0.29∗contacttime+36.15∗initilalCIP∗adsorbentdose−16.57∗adsorbentdose∗contacttime+0.09∗pH∗contacttime−14726.5∗adsorbentdose2−0.37∗pH2.According to the model fit statistics, the regression parameters such as the coefficient of determination (R2), adjusted coefficient of determination, and predicted determination coefficients are 0.9876, 0.9820, and 0.9670, respectively. Thus, the model represents 98% of the variation in the CIP removal response. The values of model regression parameters indicate proper fitness of the model as shown in Table 2. Using the CCD experimental design, Asghar et al. reported similar model fit statistics values (R2=0.96) for the CIP adsorption [59].Diagnostic plots such as externally studentized residuals against predicted, predicted against actual, and the normal probability against externally studentized residuals were analyzed to assess the model’s adequacy. These results are presented in FigureS2(a)-S2(c). The normal probability against externally studentized residual plot shown in Figure S2(a) indicated that all the points are close to the straight line, showing that the error was normally distributed. From the plot of predicted against actual shown in Figure S2(b), it can be seen that the predicted values are well correlated with the actual (experimental) values, and the model predicted data were not significantly different from the experimental results. The highest residual (difference between actual and predicted) is 2.93 for the CIP removal of 88.35%. In a plot of externally studentized residuals against predicted shown in Figure S2(c), the residuals were randomly distributed between +3.00 and −3.00, indicating that the CCD model successfully established the relationship between the independent variable and the CIP removal [68]. Overall, the diagnostic plot results agree with the coefficient of determination values of the model. Thus, the quadratic model suggested by CCD experimental design described the experimental CIP adsorption data adequately.


## 3.2.2. Effect of Individual Process Variables

The effect of the adsorption process variables such as pH, initial CIP concentration, adsorbent dose, and contact time on CIP removal was investigated. FigureS3(a)-S3(d) displays the one factor plots for each main factor. These include initial CIP concentration, adsorbent dose, pH, and contact time.(1) Effect of CIP Initial Concentration. The effect of initial CIP concentration on the adsorption efficiency was investigated. Figure S3(a) depicted that increasing the CIP initial concentration from 10 to 40 mg L-1 decreased the CIP removal efficiency from 100 to 75.52% at pH (7.5), adsorbent dose (0.5 g L-1), and contact time (46.25 min). In line with this result, Yousefi et al. reported that increasing the CIP concentration from 30 to 100 mg L-1 decreased CIP removal efficiency from 83% to 59% [9]. On the other hand, Wang et al. investigated the effect of the initial CIP concentration (10–200 mg L-1) at pH (6) and adsorbent dosage (135 mg L-1) on the adsorption capacity. In their study, the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent for cationic CIP increased very quickly for CIP initial concentration of less than 50 mg L-1 and then decreased with the increase of CIP initial concentration above 50 mg L-1 [69]. Hence, an increase in CIP initial concentration decreased the removal efficiency. This may be attributed to the lack of available sites on the adsorbent for the uptake of high CIP concentration [70]. In this study, unlike the case for CIP percentage removal, the CIP adsorption capacity increased from 20 mg g-1 to 60 mg g-1 by increasing the initial CIP concentration from 10 to 40 mg L-1. This is due to the reduction of the resistance to CIP uptake from the aqueous solution. Moreover, the higher initial CIP concentration provides a driving force to overcome the mass transfer resistance of the CIP between the solid and aqueous phases [70].(2) Effect of Adsorbent Dose. The adsorbent dose has a significant effect on the CIP removal from an aqueous solution. As depicted in Figure S3(b), using an adsorbent dose of 0.25 g L-1 at pH 7.5, 30 mg L-1 initial CIP concentration, and 46.25 min contact time resulted in 96.02% CIP removal, whereas using an adsorbent dose of 1.0 g L-1 at similar adsorption conditions almost completely removed CIP from the solution. A similar adsorption trend was observed by Gulen and Demircivi [71] in the adsorption of CIP from water using a 2: 1 dioctahedral clay structure with the increase of CIP adsorption from 1.8% (0.034 g L-1) to 99.2% (2 g L-1). Moreover, Shang et al. reported a significant increase in the CIP removal efficiency from 36 to 100%, for an increase in adsorbent (herbal residue biochar) dosage from 0.025 to 0.5 g L-1 [72]. The increase in the percentage of CIP removal with an increase in adsorbent dose is because of the increase of available active sites, which enhanced the CIP uptake [59, 73].(3) Effect of pH. The pH of the solution is an important parameter of adsorption processes because it affects the surface nature of the adsorbent and adsorbate-adsorbent interactions [59]. At pH less than pKa1 (6.1), the amine group in piperazine moiety receives a proton, and CIP+ appears. However, for pH above pKa2 (8.7), CIP occurs in anionic form (CIP−) due to amine group deprotonation. At pH between pKa1 and pKa2 of CIP, the CIP molecule exists in zwitterionic form due to the charge balance of the amine and carboxylic groups [9, 74]. Figure S3(c) depicted that the CIP removal efficiency of MBC increased by increasing the pH of the solution from 5.25 to 7.5 and then decreased with any further increase in pH. Hence, increasing pH from 5.25 to 7.5 at fixed initial CIP concentration (20 mg L-1), adsorbent dose (0.5 g L-1), and contact time (46.25 min) increased the CIP removal from 93.62% to 96.02%. Further elevation of pH to 9.75 reduced the CIP removal to 94.61%. Thus, the optimal pH for CIP adsorption onto the MBC is 7.5. This pH level is very important since ciprofloxacin forms zwitterion and that led to the strong electrostatic attraction between CIP and negatively charged MBC. Hence, maximum adsorption was obtained at this pH level. Dehghan et al. [75] observed a similar adsorption trend for the CIP using a metal-organic framework (MOF). They reported that an increase in pH from 3 to 7.5 increased the adsorption of CIP onto MOF. However, at pH values above 7.5, CIP adsorption decreased. The reason for this adsorption behavior can be attributed to protonation–deprotonation reactions in groups of CIP molecules [75].(4) Effect of Contact Time. Contact time is one of the significant factors in the adsorption of the CIP onto the MBC in this work. As shown in Figure S3(d), adsorption at an adsorbent dose (0.5 g L-1), pH (7.5), CIP initial concentration (20 mg L-1), and the contact time (18.75 min) resulted in 79.58% of CIP removal. However, CIP removal efficiency increased to 96.02% under similar adsorption conditions when the contact time increased to 46.25 min. Moreover, Figure S4 showed that the adsorption rate was rapid in the first 30 minutes and moderate in 30-70 minutes. This may be attributed to the availability of abundant free active sites on MBC at the initial adsorption stage for CIP sorption. The rate became very slow after 70 minutes, and no appreciable CIP removal was achieved. Hence, equilibrium was reached at about 70 min. The number of available active sites decreases with time, and eventually, the adsorbent becomes saturated [70]. For CIP adsorption process, optimization and adsorption experiments were conducted using the contact time range (less than 60 min), which is intentionally taken to fully investigate the effect of contact time and its interaction effects. Increasing the contact time allowed CIP molecules to reach the active sites of the adsorbent up to equilibrium time. Beyond the equilibrium time, no significant uptake of CIP took place as depicted in Figure S4.


## 3.2.3. Interaction Effects of Process Variables

Response surface methodology is a powerful tool with important features for evaluating the interactive effect of variables. In this study, 3D surface plots (Figures3(a)–3(c)) were employed to study the interaction effects on the CIP removal. The significant interaction effects include initial CIP concentration-adsorbent dose, adsorbent dose-contact time, and pH-contact time.Figure 3
Interaction effects: (a) adsorbent dose versus CIP initial concentration, (b) contact time versus adsorbent dose, and (c) contact time versus pH.
(a)(b)(c)(1) CIP Initial Concentration and Adsorbent Dose Interaction Effect. The interaction effect of CIP initial concentration and the adsorbent dose was shown in Figure 3(a). The interaction effect of CIP initial concentration and the adsorbent dose was positively significant. From the 3D plot, it was observed that the CIP removal was highest at the initial CIP concentration range of 20-25 mg L-1 and adsorbent dose range of 0.75–1.0 g L-1. The enhanced removal of CIP at the higher MBC dose was due to higher active sites for CIP adsorption [76].(2) Adsorbent Dose and Contact Time Interaction Effect. The interaction effect of MBC dose and the contact time on CIP removal is displayed using a 3D plot in Figure 3(b). CIP removal was highest at the MBC dose of 0.75-1.0 g L-1 and at the reaction time of 40-46 min. This study revealed that CIP removal increased with an increase in contact time and adsorbent dose. This is may be attributed to the availability of more active sites with adsorbent dose increment and enough contact time for MBC and CIP molecules to interact with each other [76].(3) pH and Contact Time Interaction Effect. The interaction effect of pH and contact time on CIP removal is shown in Figure 3(c). The percentage of CIP removal increased with an increase in contact time. A kinetic study showed that the adsorption rate was rapid in the first 30 minutes and became slow after 30 minutes. The CIP adsorption is strongly dependent on the pH of the solution. CIP exists in zwitterion form at pH between 6.1 and 8.7, and the electrostatic interaction between CIP and MBC is strong. The point of zero charge of MBC was 6.5, and for pH less than 6.1 and beyond 8.7, the repulsive forces became dominant, and less CIP removal was achieved. Thus, this pH range is an optimum pH level for the highest CIP removal. Figure 3(c) depicted that when pH decreased from 9.75 to 5.25 with an increase in contact time from 18.75 to 46.25 min, the CIP removal increased from 71.88 to 93.62%. In contrast, an increase in pH and a decrease in contact time decreased CIP removal. The reverse of this condition decreased the CIP removal. This showed that contact time had a superior influence on CIP removal than pH for interaction effects. However, for an increase in pH and contact time from 5.25 and 18.75 min to 9.75 and 46.25 min, CIP removal increased from 83.07 to 94.61%, respectively. Maximum CIP removal (96.02) was obtained at pH (7.5) and contact time (46.25 min) using MBC adsorbent.


## 3.2.4. Process Optimization

The optimization approach followed in CCD design to obtain the best operating conditions was by minimizing the adsorbent dosage, taking the initial CIP concentration in the range, pH in the range, and contact time in the range, and by maximizing CIP removal. Based on this criterion, the optimal condition that gave maximum CIP removal efficiency (96.02%) using the MBC adsorbent was pH (7.5), adsorbent (0.5 g L-1), contact time (46.257 min), and initial CIP concentration (20 mg L-1) with a good desirability value of 0.971. Adsorption tests were conducted at these optimum conditions to confirm the model’s credibility. Accordingly, CIP removal values of 95.68, 96.42, and 96.24 were obtained, and the mean value of these results is 96.11%. Thus, the model predicted CIP removal (96%) is close to the experimental value obtained (96.11%), showing that the model is valid.


## 3.3. Adsorption Kinetics

The kinetic study determines the effect of contact time on CIP adsorption onto MBC. The results of CIP adsorption kinetics parameters are described in Table4. The kinetic models are presented in Figures 4(a)–4(d). Initially, the sorption process was vigorous due to abundant free actives sites on the biochar surface where CIP molecules can be sorbed quickly. With time, the unoccupied active sites reduced significantly, declining the solution and solid adsorption rate to attain a steady state [67].Table 4
Kinetic models and values of their parameters.
Pseudo-first-order modelPseudo-second-orderK1 (min-1)qe,cal (mg g-1)qe,exp (mg g-1)R2K2 (g mg-1 min-1)qe,cal (mg g-1)qe,exp (mg g-1)R20.0507239.605.0290.8130.01139.6040.3870.994Intraparticle modelElovichKid (mg g-1 min-1/2)K0R2α (mg g-1 min-1)β (g mg-1)R23.2728311.8940.6400.12115.9040.859Note:qe,cal: calculated adsorbent capacity; qe,exp: experimental adsorbent capacity.Figure 4
Kinetic models of CIP adsorption onto MBC. (a) Pseudo-first-order, (b) pseudo-second-order, (c) Elovich, and (d) intraparticle models.
(a)(b)(c)(d)As shown in Table4, the pseudo-second-order model has the highest coefficient of determination (R2=0.994) compared to other kinetic models. In addition, qe (calculated) using a pseudo-second-order kinetic model is very close to the experimental qe. Hence, the pseudo-second-order model provided the best fit for the CIP experimental data as shown in Figure 4(b), suggesting that the rate of ciprofloxacin adsorption onto the MBC followed the pseudo-second-order model. Overall, these results suggest that chemisorption controlled the rate of CIP adsorption [1, 60], which involves covalent bonding through sharing electrons between MBC and CIP molecule [67]. More specifically, the π-π interaction, complexation reaction, and hydrogen bonding may have played a role in the chemisorption process. Similar findings have been reported in the literature [55].The intraparticle diffusion model was employed to investigate the rate-controlling step [77]. As the K0 increases, the contribution of the surface sorption in the rate-controlling step increases. The linear fit plot of qt versus t0.5 is displayed in Figure 4(d). The simple plot of qt versus t0.5 for the intraparticle model presented in Fig S5 showed multilinear behavior. This suggests that the adsorption process possessed multiple steps. Solute adsorption by porous adsorbents consists of three consecutive steps [27]. The first step represents the improvisational or external adsorption process. The second step is the intraparticle diffusion phase having gradual adsorption that occurs when intraparticle diffusion is rate-limiting. The last step is regarded as a final equilibrium phase in which the intraparticle diffusion starts to slow down due to a significantly lower adsorbate concentration. The intraparticle diffusion is the rate-limiting step when the regression line passes through the origin. In contrast, when the regression line does not pass through the origin, other mechanisms can control the adsorption process in addition to intraparticle diffusion.The plots showed a multilinear trend, indicating that there were three steps during the CIP adsorption process, as shown in FigureS5. The first stage occurred from 0 to 30 min0.5 and represented boundary layer mass transfer [11]. The second linear segment included the adsorption period from 30 to 80 min0.5 and which represents the intraparticle diffusion process. The third stage took place between 80 and 120 min0.5, and adsorption of CIP molecules occurred on the interior surface of the MBC. The last stage showed quite low slope due to the decrease in CIP concentrations [74] and available active sites [1] suggesting that the adsorption equilibrium was reached. In the first step, the adsorption rate was rapid, indicating a fast removal of CIP, while in the subsequent steps, the adsorption process decreased due to the decrease in CIP concentrations and available active sites [1]. Also, the low linear dependency of CIP adsorption on t0.5 indicated that the CIP adsorption dynamics seemed to be less influenced by the intraparticle diffusion mechanism [77]. On the other hand, the high K0 parameter value showed that the effect of the boundary layer was also responsible for the CIP adsorption onto MBC. Hence, it was noted that the adsorption of CIP onto MBC was enhanced due to the high surface area of the MBC and by the involvement of various functional groups on the surface of biochar [67]. Overall, the adsorption rate of CIP onto MBC was jointly controlled by liquid film diffusion, surface adsorption, and intraparticle diffusion [39].


## 3.4. Adsorption Isotherms

The isotherm models are crucial for adsorption processes because the isotherm models can provide maximum sorption capacity and the expected interactions between adsorbent and adsorbate [27]. This study considered four isotherm models to interpret and describe CIP adsorption data, including Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R). Adsorption isotherm parameters were evaluated and presented in Table 5. Also, the plots of CIP adsorption isotherm are presented in Figure 5(a)–5(d). An increase in initial concentration increased CIP adsorption capacity because the binding sites could easily come into contact with the adsorbate. After the saturation of the active sites at a particular concentration, the adsorption remains unaffected with initial concentrations [67].Table 5
Isotherm models and values of their parameters.
LangmuirFreundlichqm (mg g-1)bR2KFnR278.430.3060.9945.28446.220.972TemkinDubinin-Radushkevich (DR)bKT (L mg-1)R2qmKR2407.9252765.5640.93168.5622.784∗10−80.859Figure 5
Isotherm models plots for CIP adsorption. (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, (c) Temkin, and (d) Dubinin-Radushkevich.
(a)(b)(c)(d)From the Langmuir isotherm, the calculated value ofRL using Equation (13) can characterize the type of the isotherm and its nature: (i) irreversible isotherm (RL=0), (ii) favorable isotherm (0<RL<1), (iii) linear isotherm (RL=1), and unfavorable isotherm (RL>1) [8, 61]. In this study, RL was 0.0264, which depicted that the CIP adsorption process by MBC was favorable. The results of regression coefficients indicated that the Langmuir (R2=0.99) model fits the adsorption process well, as shown in Figure 4(a). Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models fitted the CIP adsorption data reasonably, as described in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. Conformity to these models showed that the MBC surface nature was heterogeneous, and this result is consistent with the intraparticle kinetic study that hypothesized the multimechanistic nature of CIP adsorption onto MBC [78].In this study, the MBC surface heterogeneity was confirmed by the Freundlich constant, 1/n, which was 0.11 and lay between 0 and 1 for heterogeneous surfaces. In this model, if the value of n is higher than 10, an irreversible isotherm is obtained. Values of n greater than unity indicate preferential adsorption, and less than unity indicates poor adsorption. In the present study, the value of n is greater than unity, as indicated in Table 5. Hence, the adsorption of CIP onto MBC was favorable. It can be concluded that the adsorption process was monolayer adsorption on a heterogeneous surface which is in agreement with the previous work by Li et al. [8]. The functional groups of the modified biochar (MBC) responsible for the CIP adsorption include the OH, C-H, C-O, C ≡ O, and Fe–O–Fe. These functional groups on the biochar provided a heterogeneous surface. According to the experimental findings, CIP adsorption onto these functional groups of the MBC would be in a monolayer fashion.


## 3.5. Adsorption Thermodynamics

Thermodynamic parameters of CIP adsorption onto MBC were calculated using Equations (16)–(18), and the results are shown in Table 6.Table 6
Values of thermodynamic parameters for CIP adsorption onto MBC.
Temperature (K)ΔG0 (KJ mol-1)ΔH0 (KJ mol-1)ΔS0 (KJ mol-1 K-1)298.15-13.1089.7960.775308.15-14.557318.15-14.629The obtained negative values of∆G0 indicated the spontaneity of the sorption process [39]. These results show that higher temperatures slightly favored CIP adsorption onto the MBC. The positive values of change in enthalpy (ΔH°) for CIP adsorption showed that the CIP sorption was an endothermic process. The change in entropy (ΔS0) represents the adsorbent’s attraction to the biochar surface.The positive value of the entropy for CIP adsorption onto MBC indicated that the solvent molecules occupied on the surface were easily displaced by CIP molecules enhancing the adsorption capacity [67]. In the current study, the positive values of change in entropy showed that the process of CIP adsorption was spontaneous. In conclusion, the negative Gibbs free energy and positive entropy values revealed that the CIP adsorption was favorable [67].


## 3.6. Adsorbent Regeneration Study

A regeneration study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of MBC in the CIP adsorption process. Various CIP desorption solutions such as methanol, dilute HCl, 3% NaOH+methanol, and NaOH have been used in previous studies [12, 26, 42] and thus selected and tested in MBC regeneration study. The CIP removal efficiency of MBC after first cycle desorption with 0.3 M NaOH, methanol, 3% NaOH+methanol, and 0.3 M HCl was 72.7, 47.09, 67.96, and 93.56%, respectively. Hence, 0.3 M HCl was used as an eluent for CIP desorption throughout the regeneration study. After 5 sequential adsorption/desorption cycles, the removal of CIP by MBC varied from 95.68% to 88.13% (reduction of 7.55%) as shown in Figure 6. The reusability studies revealed that 88% of CIP can be removed even in the fifth cycle suggesting enhanced stability and reusability of MBC. The reusability of the MBC without significant loss in CIP removal is one of the benefits of this process regarding environmental concerns and economic feasibility.Figure 6
CIP removal efficiency of MBC per each usage cycle.


## 3.7. Comparison of MBC with Other Sorbents

The maximum adsorption capacity of MBC was 78.43 mg g-1. The high adsorption capacity of MBC can be ascribed to the cooperative adsorption mechanism between CIP molecules and MBC. Table 7 summarizes the CIP adsorption capacity reported for various sorbents.Table 7
CIP removal efficiencies of various adsorbents.
AdsorbentCapacity (maximum uptake)Operational conditionsIsotherm and kinetics data best fit models% CIP removal (max)ReferencesAzolla filiculoides activated carbon35.14 mg g-1CIP=10 mg L-1, adsorbent dose=2.5 g L-1, and contact time=75 minLangmuir isotherm model99.1Balarak, et al. [1]NiO (synthesized)Adsorbentdose=1 g L-1, pH=3, contact time=90 min, and 50°CPseudo-second-order kinetic model99.2Balarak, et al. [1]Amine-functionalized mobil composition of matter no. 41 (MCM–41) mesoporous silica nanoparticle164.3 mg g-1pH=7, adsorbent dose = 0.8 g L-1, CIP concentration=10 mg/L, adsorption time=120 min, and shaking speed=200 rpmLangmuir isotherm model and pseudo-second-order model99.25Abu Rumman et al. [10]Activated carbon from Lemna minor plant magnetized with iron(III) oxide magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4-ACLM)178.7 mg g-1 at 50°CCIP=25 mg L-1, pH=3, Fe3O4−ACLM=0.75g L-1, contact time=75 min, and 50°CLangmuir isotherm model100Yilmaz et al. [79]γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles—pH=7.5, initial CIP=20 mg L-1, adsorbent dose=0.775, and contact time=46.25 minTemkin isotherm model and pseudo-second-order kinetic model53Asghar et al. [59]Multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNTs/Al2O3)41.73 mg g-1pH=7, MWCNTs/Al2O3=1.2 g L-1, contact time=60 min, initial CIP con=10 mg L-1, and 50°CLangmuir isotherm model—Balarak & Mckay [11]Powdered activated carbon magnetized by iron(III)oxide nanoparticles (PAC@Fe3O4-MN)109.833 mg g-1pH=7, PAC@Fe3O4-MN dose=1 g L-1, shaking speed=200 rpm, initial CIP=100 mg/L, contact time=60 min, and temperature=298 KFilm diffusion—Al et al. [26]Magnetic chalcogenide composite (KMS-1/L-cysteine/Fe3O4 (KCF)181.32 mg g-1pH=6Pseudo-second-order kinetic model—Wang et al. [69]Biochar derived from copyrolysis of sewage sludge and bamboo waste62.48 mg g-1—Pseudo-second-order, Freundlich, and Langmuir model95Li et al. [56]Herbal residue biochar43.668 mg g-1—Pseudo-second-order kinetics modelShang et al. [72]Activated carbon coated with multiwalled carbon nanotubes—pH=7, contact time=30 min, adsorbent dosage=20 mg L-1, temperature=40°C, and initial CIP=20 mg L-1Pseudo-second-order and Freundlich isotherm100Sharifpour et al. [78]Magnetic polyaniline/graphene oxide-based nanocomposites—pH=6, adsorbent dosage=1 g L-1, CIP=50 mg L-1, and contact time = 30 minFreundlich model and pseudo-second-order kinetics97Kazem et al. [80]Low-cost hydrogel derived from agrowaste106.038 mg g-1Adsorbentdose=1.0 g L-1, contact time=300 min, and pH=7Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order model—Nguyen et al. [81]Iron oxide/cellulose magnetic recyclable nanocomposite168.03 mg g-1pH=7, CIP concentration=15 mg L-1, adsorbent dosage=20 mg L-1, and contact time=40 minLangmuir isotherm and pseudo-first-order kinetic model92.01Azizi [2]Oat hulls83 mg g-1—Freundlich isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic mode—Movasaghi et al. [4]Chitosan/biochar hydrogel beads (CBHB)76 mg g-1Langmuir and pseudo-second-order kinetics—Afzal et al. [82]Magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgO)3.46 mg g-1—Langmuir adsorption isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic model85Khoshnamvand et al. [73]Humic acid modified hydrogel beads154.89 mg g-1CIPconcentration=250 mg L-1Langmuir isotherm model and pseudo-second-order kinetic model—Zaheer et al. [83]Magnetic chalcogenide composite, KMS-1/L-cysteine/Fe3O4 (KCF)181.32 mg g-1pH=6Pseudo-second-order kinetic model and Langmuir adsorption isotherm model—Wang et al. [69]Tannin foam immobilized with ferric ions91.8 mg g-1pH=7.0Pseudo-second-order rate model and Langmuir model96.60Hao et al. [84]Surfactant modified sepiolite63.84 mg g-1CIP=10 mg L-1 and adsorbent dosage=2 g L-1Pseudo-second-order model99.1Balarak et al. [85]Modified bamboo biochar (MBC)78.43 mg g-1Adsorbentdose=0.5 g L-1, CIP=20 mg L-1, pH=7.5, and contact time=46.25 minPseudo-second-order rate model and Langmuir model96This studyThe use of adsorbents for the effective removal of emerging pollutants such as pharmaceutical contaminants from water is a promising technology. In this study, MBC was found to be effective for the removal of pharmaceutical contaminants such as ciprofloxacin from wastewater. Compared to others, MBC has shown higher adsorption efficiency at a relatively lower dose and less contact time for higher pollutant concentration. The adsorbent (MBC) can be synthesized from cheap and easily available raw materials promoting the circular economy. Another benefit of MBC is the simplicity of the preparation steps compared to other adsorbents having complex synthesis steps. Moreover, MBC can be easily separated from the solution by filtration or magnetic separation. For practical water remediation applications, issues related to biochar applications in water such as the release of poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) need to be considered. In this regard, the biochar has to meet certification requirements at the commercial scale before being applied in practical water treatment processes as presented in the recent work on biochar production and certification [86]. Future research works need to focus on the effect of real wastewater matrix, type of the activated biochar (granular or powder), and chemical activation after pyrolysis on the removal of CIP using MBC.


## 3.8. Adsorption Mechanism

According to the FTIR analysis, it can be concluded that the -OH groups, C-H groups in aromatic rings, C-O alkyne, phenolic C-O bonds, and Fe-O-Fe detected on the surface of MBC may have played a significant role in the CIP adsorption process. This indicates that MBC mainly consists of aromatics, andπ-π donor-acceptor interactions may occur during adsorption [8]. The graphitic and aromatic nature of the biochar provides electron-rich π clouds, which act as π donors. Hence, the π-π electron-donor-acceptor (EDA) interaction occurs between the biochar and electron-deficient moieties of CIP (π acceptors), enhancing the overall adsorption process. In CIP adsorption using MBC (pHpzc=6.5), at low pH values (less than pKa1=6.1), the surface functional groups and unsaturated arene groups of the MBC were protonated; thus, the π electron donor interaction with CIP was minimum. However, when pH increases from 6.1 to 8.7 (pKa2), CIP becomes zwitterionic and capable of acting as both π donor and acceptor, promoting interactions with the biochar surface [67]. Moreover, the –OH and –COOH groups on the MBC surface may form hydrogen bonding with moieties such as N- and F-containing groups on the CIP molecules.Furthermore, ion exchange may happen in the adsorption process. The piperazine rings of CIP molecules were positively charged (NH2+) in neutral or faintly acid solution, and the CIP+ may be attracted by the polar and alkaline surface of biochar with H+ releasing [56]. Also, a complexation reaction between the Fe on the biochar and CIP molecules might be another removal mechanism [56]. The Fe species probably produce hydrous oxide on the surface of biochar, and one O of the carboxylate group in the CIP molecule may bind with the hydrous oxide surface. The reason may be that the CIP molecule forms a six-membered ring with an Fe atom through one O of the carboxylate group and keto O [87]. The complexation reaction probably occurs between the ketone or carboxylate functional groups of zwitterions, CIP, and Fe2O3 of the biochar. The O atom in the carboxylic group of CIP zwitterions has been reported with a more potent ligand to interact with Fe3+ [88]. The iron species on the surface of MBC may have enhanced CIP adsorption through a complexation reaction. In fact, the adsorbent screening test revealed that bamboo biochar modified solely with ferric chloride has higher CIP removal efficiency (67.38%) than the unmodified or raw bamboo biochar (45.01%), suggesting that the iron species were involved in the CIP adsorption process. This can be supported by the disappearance of the peak assigned to the iron species on the FTIR spectra after adsorption.


## 4. Conclusions

In this study, the adsorption of ciprofloxacin onto MBC was optimized by response surface methodology through the central composite design approach. The results depicted that the efficiency of ciprofloxacin adsorption was reduced at both acidic and alkaline conditions due to the interplay between the pKa value of ciprofloxacin and thepHpzc value of the MBC. The optimization study indicated that the adsorbent dose and contact time variables directly correlate with CIP removal efficiency, whereas the initial concentration of CIP has an inverse relationship with the removal efficiency. Statistical analysis revealed that the considered levels of MBC dose and CIP initial concentration had the most significant effects on CIP adsorption compared to other parameters studied. Based on the CCD design, the optimal operating conditions obtained for CIP adsorption onto MBC were pH (7.5), adsorbent dose (0.5 g L-1), initial CIP concentration (20 mg L-1), and contact time (46 min), which gave a remarkably high CIP removal of 96%. The adsorption process experimental kinetic data were well described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, suggesting that the chemisorption process mainly controlled the adsorption rate. On the other hand, a kinetic study of intraparticle diffusion revealed that the adsorption rate was jointly controlled by liquid film diffusion, surface adsorption, and intraparticle diffusion.Moreover, the isotherm study showed that Langmuir (R2=0.994) and the Freundlich (R2=0.972) models fit the experimental CIP adsorption data with Langmuir’s superior goodness of fit. Thus, it can be deduced from these results that the adsorption of CIP onto MBC was a monolayer on a heterogeneous surface. Also, Langmuir’s (RL) and Freundlich’s (n) model parameters have indicated that CIP adsorption was favorable. Compared to the unmodified biochar, modifying bamboo with ferric chloride and alkali (potassium hydroxide) improved its surface structure and specific surface area. Hence, higher adsorption of CIP was observed for MBC than for UBC. Besides surface area increment, modification of the biochar increased biochar aromaticity. The various functional groups on the biochar surface were mainly responsible for CIP adsorption onto the MBC through π-π interaction, hydrogen bonding, ion exchange, and electrostatic interaction. Moreover, the iron species on the surface of MBC resulting from the bamboo’s ferric chloride modification has probably led complexation reaction between biochar and CIP molecule. Thus, the high BET surface area (1158.05 m2g-1) and the involvement of various functional groups in the adsorption process resulted in higher CIP removal by MBC from an aqueous solution. The thermodynamic study has shown that the CIP adsorption process was endothermic and spontaneous. Thus, this study revealed that MBC could be an effective adsorbent for removing ciprofloxacin from water due to its high adsorptive capacity and excellent recyclability.Higher CIP uptake capacity and excellent reusability of the MBC could be a promising indication for practical applications. In the future, the performance of MBC in the removal of multiple pharmaceutical contaminants with different characteristics shall be addressed using fixed-bed column adsorption.



---

*Source: 2699530-2022-07-31.xml*