# Synthesis and Antimicrobial Resistant Modulatory Activity of 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazone Derivatives as Agents against Some ESKAPE Human Pathogens

Authors: Alberta Ade; Cedric D. K. Amengor; Abena Brobbey; Isaac Ayensu; Benjamin K. Harley; Yaw Duah Boakye
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

A library of six novel phenylhydrazones were synthesized and evaluated for theirin vitro antimicrobial and resistance modulating activity against a panel of Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and fungal species. The compounds were produced in good yields of 60–92% w/w and characterized using melting point, UV-visible spectroscopy, infrared, and nuclear magnetic resonance (1H, 13C, and DEPT-Q) techniques. Mass spectroscopy was used to confirm the identity of one of the most active compounds, 5 [SA5]. The phenylhydrazones showed activity against all the six selected microorganisms with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of the most active compounds, 1 [BP1] and 5 [SA5], at 138 µM (Klebsiella pneumoniae) and 165 µM (Streptococcus pneumoniae), respectively. Compound 1 [BP1] further demonstrated a high resistance modulatory activity at 1.078 µM against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Klebsiella pneumoniae.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The world in recent decades is running out of effective antibiotics due to the increased prevalence of multidrug resistant organisms [1]. This has led to an increase in resistant infections requiring scientists to relentlessly explore the possibility of synthesizing analogues of active or lead compounds as novel antimicrobials to curb these infections and resultant diseases. Infectious diseases over the centuries have become a major threat to the existence of mankind as they continue to negatively impact society significantly [2]. The pathogenic agents such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites continue to emerge and are on the upsurge especially in the 21st century despite several attempts to curtail them [3]. Infectious diseases account for the death of about 17 million people annually, with the emergence of at least thirty new diseases. The world is currently battling the pandemic COVID-19 caused by corona virus that has already claimed over 25,000 lives globally within three months (WHO, 2020). These diseases threaten the health of millions of people especially as no cure or vaccine exists. The increasing trend of microbial infections is largely due to the perennial issue of antimicrobial resistance which has been on the ascendency. Key myriad causes of antimicrobial resistance include prolonged chemotherapy and noncompliance to dosage regimen [4].The growing resistance to antibiotics has led to the increasing trend of pathogens like methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MDR-TB), and multidrug resistant Escherichia coli (MDR-Escherichia coli) [5, 6]. Moreover, of most concern in the treatment of nosocomial infections are the ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) [7]. Their presence in infections has been a worrying situation in the health sector since most of them are resistant to many antibiotics, and understanding the mechanism of resistance of these strains is useful in the development of novel antimicrobial agents [8, 9].The World Health Organization has made it clear that the trend of increasing infectious diseases would continue due to a number of factors including rural-urban migration, increase in global population, microbial adaptation, and climate change [10]. These would favor the emergence and spread of pathogens, so stakeholders including medicinal chemists are continuously urged to design strategies to discover new chemotherapeutic agents to overcome the antimicrobial resistance menace [11]. Resistant modulatory activity of a compound is the ability of the compound to have controlling influence on the already known standards especially in a positive way. Due to the increasing resistance of microorganisms to antibiotics, agents from natural or synthetic sources seem to modulate the activity of some standard antimicrobial agents such as amoxicillin (a), ciprofloxacin (b), and fluconazole (c) (Figure 1).Figure 1
Chemical structures of some standard antibiotics [11]: (a) amoxicillin; (b) ciprofloxacin; (c) fluconazole.
(a)(b)(c)Resistance modulatory activities of products (both natural and synthetic) on standard antibiotics have gained scientific interest in recent years. This aims at maximizing antimicrobial potency with major strides in curbing microbial resistance and hence leading to potential drug discovery. An important class of such synthetic agents with promising resistance modulation effect is hydrazones [11]. Hydrazones and their analogues possess the azomethine functionality, an important group of compounds with broad spectrum of biological activities [11, 12]. Hydrazones were chosen due to their wide array of pharmacological activities such as anticonvulsant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antiprotozoal, and anticancer activities. They play crucial roles not only in biology but also in the fields of photochemistry, analytical chemistry, and inorganic chemistry. Hydrazones are related to ketones and aldehydes by substitution of oxygen with −NNH2 functional moiety [13, 14]. Due to varying synthetic protocols and detailed structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies, different hydrazone derivatives have been developed and discovered to be pharmacologically active at various targets [15]. Some hydrazone derivatives of isonicotinoyl were found to possess antitubercular activity. Furthermore, benzoic acid hydrazone derivative 4-hydroxybenzoic acid [(5-nitro-2-furyl) methylene]-hydrazide (nifuroxazide) was found to be active against intestinal worms, and derivative 4-fluorobenzoic acid [(5-nitro-2-furyl) methylene]-hydrazide showed antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 at 3.13 μg/mL and susceptible Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37RV also at 3.13 μg/mL [16, 17]. Recently synthesized hydrazones including nifuroxazide were found to be active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37RV at minimum inhibitory concentration range of 0.78–6.25 μg/ml. A new agent, 3, 5-dibenzoylvanillin hydrazone, and transition metal complexes were found to exhibit impressive antibacterial activity [18, 19].Hence in this study, six novel phenylhydrazone derivatives have been successfully synthesized by nucleophilic condensation reaction, with their antimicrobial activities and resistance modulation effects investigated.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Synthesis: General Materials and Methods

A round bottom flask (100 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirring bar was charged with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (1 eq.) in methanol (10 mL) maintained in an ice bath. The resulting suspension was stirred and cooled to 0°C before adding concentrated H2SO4 (98% v/v, 2 mL) dropwise which gave a pale yellow solution. After cooling to room temperature, an aldehyde or ketone derivative (1.04 eq.) in methanol (5 mL) was added and the mixture stirred until there was a gradual formation of precipitate which was left for 24 hours. The progress of the chemical reactions was monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) intermittently using aluminium plates coated with silica gel (60 GF254). The plates were visualized under UV light at 254 nm and 366 nm, which was followed by spraying with anisaldehyde for spot identity confirmation. The crude product was filtered by suction filtration and recrystallized from hot absolute ethanol (96% v/v). The solid product was obtained by suction filtration, dried, and stored at room temperature.The structures of the synthesized compounds were established with melting point determinations, mass spectroscopy, 1D NMR (proton and carbon-13), and 2D NMR (DEPT-Q) spectroscopy with the support of infrared (IR) and ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy techniques [20].


#### 2.1.1. 1-(2,4-Dinitrophenyl)-2-(diphenylmethylene) Hydrazine [C19H14N4O4, 1]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.50 g, 2.74 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of benzophenone (0.53 g, 1.04 eq., 2.64 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [1] (0.84 g, 85%) as a light orange solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.90. Mpt: 141–143°C; UV-V is (MeOH) λmax: 382 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax cm−1: 3382 (OH), 3286 (NH), 1586 (C = CH), 848, 614 (ArH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH 11.24 (1H, H-C1, s, NH), 9.09–9.10 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.41 (1H, H-C5, d, J = 2.4, ArH), 8.37–8.38 (1H, H-C6, m, ArH), 7.66–7.72 (5H, H-C4′, H-C5′, H-C6′, H-C5′, H-C3′, m, ArH), 7.35 (3H, H-C6″, H-C5″, H-C4″, m, ArH), 7.57 (2H, H-C5′, H-C3′, m, ArH) ppm. 13C NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3) δc 155.7, 145.1, 136.5, 131.9, 130.5, 130.4, 130.1, 129.9, 128.6, 128.2, 127.9, 123.4, 116.6 ppm.


#### 2.1.2. 1-Benzylidene-2-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) Hydrazine [C13H10N4O4, 2]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.90 g, 4.53 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of benzaldehyde (0.50 g, 1.04 eq., 4.71 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [2] (1.01 g, 78%) as a yellow solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.83. Mpt: 178–180°C; UV-V is (MeOH) λmax: 224 nm and 378 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax cm−1: 3337 (OH), 3283 (NH), 3100 (C = CH), 1618, 1584 (ArC = C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 11.24 (1H, H-C1, s, NH), 9.09 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.30–8.31 (1H, H-C1′, s, N = CH), 8.05 (1H, H-C5, m, ArH), 8.02 (1H, H-C6, m, ArH), 7.41–7.69 (2H, H-C2′, H-C6′, m, ArH), 7.40 (1H, H-C4′, m, ArH), 7.39 (2H, H-C3′, H-C5′, m, ArH). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δc 147.9, 145.8, 144.9, 144.7, 131.0, 130.0, 129.0, 127.6, 123.5, 116.8 ppm.


#### 2.1.3. 3-(2-2-(4-Dinitrophenyl) Hydrazono) Methylphenol [C13H10N4O5, 3]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.78 g, 3.93 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence ofm-hydroxybenzaldehyde (0.50 g, 1.04 eq., 4.09 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product (0.76 g, 64%) as a dark red solid. Rf (Pet. Ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.74. Mpt: 277–280°C. UV-Vis (MeOH) λmax: 392 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax cm−1: 3420 (OH), 3257 (NH), 3116 (C = CH), 1607, 1584 (ArC = C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 11.56 (1H, H-C1, s, NH), 10.04 (1H, H-C2′, s, ArOH), 8.88 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.86 (1H, H-C7, s, N = CH), 8.35–8.37 (1H H-C5, d, J = 8.0, ArH), 8.08–8.34 (1H, H-C6), d, J = 12.0, ArH), 8.05 (1H, H-C5′, m, ArH), 7.66 (1H, H-C1′, s, ArH), 7.14 (1H, H-C4′, m, ArH), 6.87–6.89 (1H (H-C3′, m, ArH). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δc 160.5, 150.5, 144.9, 137.1, 130.2, 129.8, 129.5, 125.2, 123.6, 117.1, 116.4 ppm.


#### 2.1.4. 4-(2-(2,4-Dinitrophenyl) Hydrazono) Methyl)-2-methoxyphenol [C14H12N4O6, 4]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.78 g, 3.93 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (vanillin) (0.50 g, 1.04 eq., 4.09 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [4] (0.91 g, 70%) as a bright red solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.66. Mpt: 270–273°C. UV-Vis (MeOH) λmax: 218 nm and 394 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax cm−1: 3363 (OH), 3274 (NH), 3111 (C = CH), 1605 (ArC = C), 699 (ArH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 11.58 (1H, s, NH), 10.11 (1H, H-C4′, s, ArOH), 9.94 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.87 (1H, H-C5, s, ArH), 8.86 (1H, H-C7, s, N = CH), 8.35 (1H, H-C6, d, J = 4.0, ArH), 7.97 (1H, H-C2′, d, J = 4.0, ArH), 7.66–7.76 (1H, H-C6′, d, J = 8.0, ArH), 6.38–6.35 (1H, H-C5′, d, J = 12.0, ArH), (3H, H-C4′, Ar-OCH3). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δc 150.7, 150.2, 148.6, 144.9, 137.1, 130.2, 125.6, 123.6, 123.1, 117.2, 116.1, 110.3, 56.2 ppm.


#### 2.1.5. (Z)-2-(2, 4-Dinitrophenyl) Hydrazono) Methyl Phenol [C13H10N4O5, 5]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.78 g, 3.93 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of salicylaldehyde (0.50 g, 4.09 mmol, 1.04 eq.) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [5] (1.09 g, 92%) as a bright orange solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.84. Mpt: 176–180°C; UV-Vis (MeOH) λmax: 386 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax (cm−1): 3334 (OH), 3267 (NH), 3059 (C = CH), 1583 (ArC = C), 759 (ArH) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 11.25 (1H, H-C3′, s, ArOH), 9.98 (1H (C1), s, NH), 9.11 (1H H-C3, s, ArH), 8.34–8.36 (1H, H-C1′, s, N = CH), 8.33 (1H, H-C5, d, J = 4.0, ArH), 7.61–7.58 (1H, H-C6, d, J = 4.0, ArH), 7.31 (1H, H-C6′, m, ArH), 7.25 (1H, H-C4′, m, ArH), 7.24 (1H, H-C7, m, ArH), 6.95 (1H, H-C5′, m, ArH) ppm. 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δc 157.9, 151.3, 132.9, 131.4, 130.6, 123.7, 120.3, 117.2, 116.9, 115.3 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for [M-H]+ C13H10N4O5: 302.2400, found: 301.0000.


#### 2.1.6. 4-(2-(2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazono) Methyl) Benzene-1, 3-diol [C13H10N4O6, 6]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.69 g, 3.48 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of 2, 4-dihydroxy benzaldehyde (0.50 g, 1.04 eq., 3.62 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [6] (0.66 g, 2.07 mmol, 60%) as a dark red solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.51. Mpt: 270–274°C; UV-Vis (MeOH) λmax: 403 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax (cm−1): 3364 (OH), 3094 (C = CH), 1612, 1584 (ArC = C) 592 (ArH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 11.58 (1H, H-C3′, s, ArOH), 10.11 (1H, H-C1, s, NH), 9.94 (1H, H-C5′, s, ArOH), 8.87 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.86 (1H, s, N = CH), 8.33 (1H, H-C4′, s, ArH), 8.36 (1H, H-C5, d, J = 12.0, ArH), 7.95–7.97 (1H, H-C6, d, J = 8.0, ArH), 7.54 (1H, H-C7, m, ArH), 6.38 (1H, H-C6′, d, J = 8.0, ArH) ppm. 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δc 161.8, 159.1, 148.2, 144.6, 136.7, 130.1, 129.3, 128.8, 123.6, 116.9, 112.0, 108.7, 102.1 ppm.


### 2.2. Antimicrobial Evaluation of the Compounds

#### 2.2.1. Source of Test Organisms

Pure cultures ofStaphylococcus aureus (SA) (ATCC 25923), Escherichia coli (EC) (ATCC 25922), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) (ATCC 27853) were obtained from the Microbiology Division of the Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi. However, Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP), Candida albicans (CA), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) were clinical strains obtained from the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, and cultured in the Department of Pharmaceutics, KNUST.


#### 2.2.2. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The microbroth dilution method was employed for determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the hydrazone derivatives and the reference drugs ciprofloxacin and fluconazole. 96-well microtiter plates were filled with 125µL of double strength nutrient broth, and different concentrations of the hydrazone derivatives added. The reference drugs in the range 12.5 µL/mL to 40 µL/mL were similarly treated. An aliquot of 1 × 105 cfu/mL of test organisms was added to each well. The control plate was filled with nutrient broth and test organisms only. The test and control plates were incubated at 37°C (24 hours for bacteria and 48 hours for fungus), after which 20 µL of 1.25 mg/ml of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was introduced into each well. Observations were made after 20 minutes for a purple coloration, which indicates growth. The minimum concentrations of the hydrazone derivatives and reference drugs that did not show color change in the wells were deemed to be the MIC values [21, 22]. The determinations were carried out in replicates.


#### 2.2.3. Resistant Modulation Studies

For the modulation studies, the 96-well plates were filled with 125µL of double strength nutrient broth, and the same volume of 40 µL phenylhydrazones was added. Different concentrations in the ranges 50 µL/ml to 7.812 µL/ml and 15.625 µL/ml to 7.812 µL/ml of ciprofloxacin and fluconazole were, respectively, added. 25 µL containing 1 × 105 cfu of test organisms was added to each well, and the plates were incubated at 37°C (for 24 and 48 hours for bacteria and fungus, respectively), after which 20 µL of MTT was added to each well. The appearance of a change in color from cloudy wells to purple was recorded and compared with MICs of the reference drugs only [22, 23]. The determinations were carried out in replicates.


## 2.1. Synthesis: General Materials and Methods

A round bottom flask (100 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirring bar was charged with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (1 eq.) in methanol (10 mL) maintained in an ice bath. The resulting suspension was stirred and cooled to 0°C before adding concentrated H2SO4 (98% v/v, 2 mL) dropwise which gave a pale yellow solution. After cooling to room temperature, an aldehyde or ketone derivative (1.04 eq.) in methanol (5 mL) was added and the mixture stirred until there was a gradual formation of precipitate which was left for 24 hours. The progress of the chemical reactions was monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) intermittently using aluminium plates coated with silica gel (60 GF254). The plates were visualized under UV light at 254 nm and 366 nm, which was followed by spraying with anisaldehyde for spot identity confirmation. The crude product was filtered by suction filtration and recrystallized from hot absolute ethanol (96% v/v). The solid product was obtained by suction filtration, dried, and stored at room temperature.The structures of the synthesized compounds were established with melting point determinations, mass spectroscopy, 1D NMR (proton and carbon-13), and 2D NMR (DEPT-Q) spectroscopy with the support of infrared (IR) and ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy techniques [20].


### 2.1.1. 1-(2,4-Dinitrophenyl)-2-(diphenylmethylene) Hydrazine [C19H14N4O4, 1]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.50 g, 2.74 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of benzophenone (0.53 g, 1.04 eq., 2.64 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [1] (0.84 g, 85%) as a light orange solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.90. Mpt: 141–143°C; UV-V is (MeOH) λmax: 382 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax cm−1: 3382 (OH), 3286 (NH), 1586 (C = CH), 848, 614 (ArH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH 11.24 (1H, H-C1, s, NH), 9.09–9.10 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.41 (1H, H-C5, d, J = 2.4, ArH), 8.37–8.38 (1H, H-C6, m, ArH), 7.66–7.72 (5H, H-C4′, H-C5′, H-C6′, H-C5′, H-C3′, m, ArH), 7.35 (3H, H-C6″, H-C5″, H-C4″, m, ArH), 7.57 (2H, H-C5′, H-C3′, m, ArH) ppm. 13C NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3) δc 155.7, 145.1, 136.5, 131.9, 130.5, 130.4, 130.1, 129.9, 128.6, 128.2, 127.9, 123.4, 116.6 ppm.


### 2.1.2. 1-Benzylidene-2-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) Hydrazine [C13H10N4O4, 2]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.90 g, 4.53 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of benzaldehyde (0.50 g, 1.04 eq., 4.71 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [2] (1.01 g, 78%) as a yellow solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.83. Mpt: 178–180°C; UV-V is (MeOH) λmax: 224 nm and 378 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax cm−1: 3337 (OH), 3283 (NH), 3100 (C = CH), 1618, 1584 (ArC = C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 11.24 (1H, H-C1, s, NH), 9.09 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.30–8.31 (1H, H-C1′, s, N = CH), 8.05 (1H, H-C5, m, ArH), 8.02 (1H, H-C6, m, ArH), 7.41–7.69 (2H, H-C2′, H-C6′, m, ArH), 7.40 (1H, H-C4′, m, ArH), 7.39 (2H, H-C3′, H-C5′, m, ArH). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δc 147.9, 145.8, 144.9, 144.7, 131.0, 130.0, 129.0, 127.6, 123.5, 116.8 ppm.


### 2.1.3. 3-(2-2-(4-Dinitrophenyl) Hydrazono) Methylphenol [C13H10N4O5, 3]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.78 g, 3.93 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence ofm-hydroxybenzaldehyde (0.50 g, 1.04 eq., 4.09 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product (0.76 g, 64%) as a dark red solid. Rf (Pet. Ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.74. Mpt: 277–280°C. UV-Vis (MeOH) λmax: 392 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax cm−1: 3420 (OH), 3257 (NH), 3116 (C = CH), 1607, 1584 (ArC = C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 11.56 (1H, H-C1, s, NH), 10.04 (1H, H-C2′, s, ArOH), 8.88 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.86 (1H, H-C7, s, N = CH), 8.35–8.37 (1H H-C5, d, J = 8.0, ArH), 8.08–8.34 (1H, H-C6), d, J = 12.0, ArH), 8.05 (1H, H-C5′, m, ArH), 7.66 (1H, H-C1′, s, ArH), 7.14 (1H, H-C4′, m, ArH), 6.87–6.89 (1H (H-C3′, m, ArH). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δc 160.5, 150.5, 144.9, 137.1, 130.2, 129.8, 129.5, 125.2, 123.6, 117.1, 116.4 ppm.


### 2.1.4. 4-(2-(2,4-Dinitrophenyl) Hydrazono) Methyl)-2-methoxyphenol [C14H12N4O6, 4]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.78 g, 3.93 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (vanillin) (0.50 g, 1.04 eq., 4.09 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [4] (0.91 g, 70%) as a bright red solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.66. Mpt: 270–273°C. UV-Vis (MeOH) λmax: 218 nm and 394 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax cm−1: 3363 (OH), 3274 (NH), 3111 (C = CH), 1605 (ArC = C), 699 (ArH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 11.58 (1H, s, NH), 10.11 (1H, H-C4′, s, ArOH), 9.94 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.87 (1H, H-C5, s, ArH), 8.86 (1H, H-C7, s, N = CH), 8.35 (1H, H-C6, d, J = 4.0, ArH), 7.97 (1H, H-C2′, d, J = 4.0, ArH), 7.66–7.76 (1H, H-C6′, d, J = 8.0, ArH), 6.38–6.35 (1H, H-C5′, d, J = 12.0, ArH), (3H, H-C4′, Ar-OCH3). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δc 150.7, 150.2, 148.6, 144.9, 137.1, 130.2, 125.6, 123.6, 123.1, 117.2, 116.1, 110.3, 56.2 ppm.


### 2.1.5. (Z)-2-(2, 4-Dinitrophenyl) Hydrazono) Methyl Phenol [C13H10N4O5, 5]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.78 g, 3.93 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of salicylaldehyde (0.50 g, 4.09 mmol, 1.04 eq.) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [5] (1.09 g, 92%) as a bright orange solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.84. Mpt: 176–180°C; UV-Vis (MeOH) λmax: 386 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax (cm−1): 3334 (OH), 3267 (NH), 3059 (C = CH), 1583 (ArC = C), 759 (ArH) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 11.25 (1H, H-C3′, s, ArOH), 9.98 (1H (C1), s, NH), 9.11 (1H H-C3, s, ArH), 8.34–8.36 (1H, H-C1′, s, N = CH), 8.33 (1H, H-C5, d, J = 4.0, ArH), 7.61–7.58 (1H, H-C6, d, J = 4.0, ArH), 7.31 (1H, H-C6′, m, ArH), 7.25 (1H, H-C4′, m, ArH), 7.24 (1H, H-C7, m, ArH), 6.95 (1H, H-C5′, m, ArH) ppm. 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δc 157.9, 151.3, 132.9, 131.4, 130.6, 123.7, 120.3, 117.2, 116.9, 115.3 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for [M-H]+ C13H10N4O5: 302.2400, found: 301.0000.


### 2.1.6. 4-(2-(2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazono) Methyl) Benzene-1, 3-diol [C13H10N4O6, 6]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.69 g, 3.48 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of 2, 4-dihydroxy benzaldehyde (0.50 g, 1.04 eq., 3.62 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [6] (0.66 g, 2.07 mmol, 60%) as a dark red solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.51. Mpt: 270–274°C; UV-Vis (MeOH) λmax: 403 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax (cm−1): 3364 (OH), 3094 (C = CH), 1612, 1584 (ArC = C) 592 (ArH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 11.58 (1H, H-C3′, s, ArOH), 10.11 (1H, H-C1, s, NH), 9.94 (1H, H-C5′, s, ArOH), 8.87 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.86 (1H, s, N = CH), 8.33 (1H, H-C4′, s, ArH), 8.36 (1H, H-C5, d, J = 12.0, ArH), 7.95–7.97 (1H, H-C6, d, J = 8.0, ArH), 7.54 (1H, H-C7, m, ArH), 6.38 (1H, H-C6′, d, J = 8.0, ArH) ppm. 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δc 161.8, 159.1, 148.2, 144.6, 136.7, 130.1, 129.3, 128.8, 123.6, 116.9, 112.0, 108.7, 102.1 ppm.


## 2.1.1. 1-(2,4-Dinitrophenyl)-2-(diphenylmethylene) Hydrazine [C19H14N4O4, 1]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.50 g, 2.74 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of benzophenone (0.53 g, 1.04 eq., 2.64 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [1] (0.84 g, 85%) as a light orange solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.90. Mpt: 141–143°C; UV-V is (MeOH) λmax: 382 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax cm−1: 3382 (OH), 3286 (NH), 1586 (C = CH), 848, 614 (ArH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH 11.24 (1H, H-C1, s, NH), 9.09–9.10 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.41 (1H, H-C5, d, J = 2.4, ArH), 8.37–8.38 (1H, H-C6, m, ArH), 7.66–7.72 (5H, H-C4′, H-C5′, H-C6′, H-C5′, H-C3′, m, ArH), 7.35 (3H, H-C6″, H-C5″, H-C4″, m, ArH), 7.57 (2H, H-C5′, H-C3′, m, ArH) ppm. 13C NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3) δc 155.7, 145.1, 136.5, 131.9, 130.5, 130.4, 130.1, 129.9, 128.6, 128.2, 127.9, 123.4, 116.6 ppm.


## 2.1.2. 1-Benzylidene-2-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) Hydrazine [C13H10N4O4, 2]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.90 g, 4.53 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of benzaldehyde (0.50 g, 1.04 eq., 4.71 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [2] (1.01 g, 78%) as a yellow solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.83. Mpt: 178–180°C; UV-V is (MeOH) λmax: 224 nm and 378 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax cm−1: 3337 (OH), 3283 (NH), 3100 (C = CH), 1618, 1584 (ArC = C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 11.24 (1H, H-C1, s, NH), 9.09 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.30–8.31 (1H, H-C1′, s, N = CH), 8.05 (1H, H-C5, m, ArH), 8.02 (1H, H-C6, m, ArH), 7.41–7.69 (2H, H-C2′, H-C6′, m, ArH), 7.40 (1H, H-C4′, m, ArH), 7.39 (2H, H-C3′, H-C5′, m, ArH). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δc 147.9, 145.8, 144.9, 144.7, 131.0, 130.0, 129.0, 127.6, 123.5, 116.8 ppm.


## 2.1.3. 3-(2-2-(4-Dinitrophenyl) Hydrazono) Methylphenol [C13H10N4O5, 3]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.78 g, 3.93 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence ofm-hydroxybenzaldehyde (0.50 g, 1.04 eq., 4.09 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product (0.76 g, 64%) as a dark red solid. Rf (Pet. Ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.74. Mpt: 277–280°C. UV-Vis (MeOH) λmax: 392 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax cm−1: 3420 (OH), 3257 (NH), 3116 (C = CH), 1607, 1584 (ArC = C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 11.56 (1H, H-C1, s, NH), 10.04 (1H, H-C2′, s, ArOH), 8.88 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.86 (1H, H-C7, s, N = CH), 8.35–8.37 (1H H-C5, d, J = 8.0, ArH), 8.08–8.34 (1H, H-C6), d, J = 12.0, ArH), 8.05 (1H, H-C5′, m, ArH), 7.66 (1H, H-C1′, s, ArH), 7.14 (1H, H-C4′, m, ArH), 6.87–6.89 (1H (H-C3′, m, ArH). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δc 160.5, 150.5, 144.9, 137.1, 130.2, 129.8, 129.5, 125.2, 123.6, 117.1, 116.4 ppm.


## 2.1.4. 4-(2-(2,4-Dinitrophenyl) Hydrazono) Methyl)-2-methoxyphenol [C14H12N4O6, 4]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.78 g, 3.93 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (vanillin) (0.50 g, 1.04 eq., 4.09 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [4] (0.91 g, 70%) as a bright red solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.66. Mpt: 270–273°C. UV-Vis (MeOH) λmax: 218 nm and 394 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax cm−1: 3363 (OH), 3274 (NH), 3111 (C = CH), 1605 (ArC = C), 699 (ArH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 11.58 (1H, s, NH), 10.11 (1H, H-C4′, s, ArOH), 9.94 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.87 (1H, H-C5, s, ArH), 8.86 (1H, H-C7, s, N = CH), 8.35 (1H, H-C6, d, J = 4.0, ArH), 7.97 (1H, H-C2′, d, J = 4.0, ArH), 7.66–7.76 (1H, H-C6′, d, J = 8.0, ArH), 6.38–6.35 (1H, H-C5′, d, J = 12.0, ArH), (3H, H-C4′, Ar-OCH3). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δc 150.7, 150.2, 148.6, 144.9, 137.1, 130.2, 125.6, 123.6, 123.1, 117.2, 116.1, 110.3, 56.2 ppm.


## 2.1.5. (Z)-2-(2, 4-Dinitrophenyl) Hydrazono) Methyl Phenol [C13H10N4O5, 5]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.78 g, 3.93 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of salicylaldehyde (0.50 g, 4.09 mmol, 1.04 eq.) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [5] (1.09 g, 92%) as a bright orange solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.84. Mpt: 176–180°C; UV-Vis (MeOH) λmax: 386 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax (cm−1): 3334 (OH), 3267 (NH), 3059 (C = CH), 1583 (ArC = C), 759 (ArH) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 11.25 (1H, H-C3′, s, ArOH), 9.98 (1H (C1), s, NH), 9.11 (1H H-C3, s, ArH), 8.34–8.36 (1H, H-C1′, s, N = CH), 8.33 (1H, H-C5, d, J = 4.0, ArH), 7.61–7.58 (1H, H-C6, d, J = 4.0, ArH), 7.31 (1H, H-C6′, m, ArH), 7.25 (1H, H-C4′, m, ArH), 7.24 (1H, H-C7, m, ArH), 6.95 (1H, H-C5′, m, ArH) ppm. 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δc 157.9, 151.3, 132.9, 131.4, 130.6, 123.7, 120.3, 117.2, 116.9, 115.3 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for [M-H]+ C13H10N4O5: 302.2400, found: 301.0000.


## 2.1.6. 4-(2-(2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazono) Methyl) Benzene-1, 3-diol [C13H10N4O6, 6]

2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (0.69 g, 3.48 mmol, 1 eq.) in the presence of 2, 4-dihydroxy benzaldehyde (0.50 g, 1.04 eq., 3.62 mmol) yielded the crude product which was purified by recrystallization from hot ethanol to obtain the product [6] (0.66 g, 2.07 mmol, 60%) as a dark red solid. Rf (Pet. ether 70%: EtOAc 30%): 0.51. Mpt: 270–274°C; UV-Vis (MeOH) λmax: 403 nm. Infrared (neat) υmax (cm−1): 3364 (OH), 3094 (C = CH), 1612, 1584 (ArC = C) 592 (ArH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 11.58 (1H, H-C3′, s, ArOH), 10.11 (1H, H-C1, s, NH), 9.94 (1H, H-C5′, s, ArOH), 8.87 (1H, H-C3, s, ArH), 8.86 (1H, s, N = CH), 8.33 (1H, H-C4′, s, ArH), 8.36 (1H, H-C5, d, J = 12.0, ArH), 7.95–7.97 (1H, H-C6, d, J = 8.0, ArH), 7.54 (1H, H-C7, m, ArH), 6.38 (1H, H-C6′, d, J = 8.0, ArH) ppm. 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δc 161.8, 159.1, 148.2, 144.6, 136.7, 130.1, 129.3, 128.8, 123.6, 116.9, 112.0, 108.7, 102.1 ppm.


## 2.2. Antimicrobial Evaluation of the Compounds

### 2.2.1. Source of Test Organisms

Pure cultures ofStaphylococcus aureus (SA) (ATCC 25923), Escherichia coli (EC) (ATCC 25922), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) (ATCC 27853) were obtained from the Microbiology Division of the Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi. However, Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP), Candida albicans (CA), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) were clinical strains obtained from the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, and cultured in the Department of Pharmaceutics, KNUST.


### 2.2.2. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The microbroth dilution method was employed for determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the hydrazone derivatives and the reference drugs ciprofloxacin and fluconazole. 96-well microtiter plates were filled with 125µL of double strength nutrient broth, and different concentrations of the hydrazone derivatives added. The reference drugs in the range 12.5 µL/mL to 40 µL/mL were similarly treated. An aliquot of 1 × 105 cfu/mL of test organisms was added to each well. The control plate was filled with nutrient broth and test organisms only. The test and control plates were incubated at 37°C (24 hours for bacteria and 48 hours for fungus), after which 20 µL of 1.25 mg/ml of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was introduced into each well. Observations were made after 20 minutes for a purple coloration, which indicates growth. The minimum concentrations of the hydrazone derivatives and reference drugs that did not show color change in the wells were deemed to be the MIC values [21, 22]. The determinations were carried out in replicates.


### 2.2.3. Resistant Modulation Studies

For the modulation studies, the 96-well plates were filled with 125µL of double strength nutrient broth, and the same volume of 40 µL phenylhydrazones was added. Different concentrations in the ranges 50 µL/ml to 7.812 µL/ml and 15.625 µL/ml to 7.812 µL/ml of ciprofloxacin and fluconazole were, respectively, added. 25 µL containing 1 × 105 cfu of test organisms was added to each well, and the plates were incubated at 37°C (for 24 and 48 hours for bacteria and fungus, respectively), after which 20 µL of MTT was added to each well. The appearance of a change in color from cloudy wells to purple was recorded and compared with MICs of the reference drugs only [22, 23]. The determinations were carried out in replicates.


## 2.2.1. Source of Test Organisms

Pure cultures ofStaphylococcus aureus (SA) (ATCC 25923), Escherichia coli (EC) (ATCC 25922), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) (ATCC 27853) were obtained from the Microbiology Division of the Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi. However, Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP), Candida albicans (CA), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) were clinical strains obtained from the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, and cultured in the Department of Pharmaceutics, KNUST.


## 2.2.2. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The microbroth dilution method was employed for determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the hydrazone derivatives and the reference drugs ciprofloxacin and fluconazole. 96-well microtiter plates were filled with 125µL of double strength nutrient broth, and different concentrations of the hydrazone derivatives added. The reference drugs in the range 12.5 µL/mL to 40 µL/mL were similarly treated. An aliquot of 1 × 105 cfu/mL of test organisms was added to each well. The control plate was filled with nutrient broth and test organisms only. The test and control plates were incubated at 37°C (24 hours for bacteria and 48 hours for fungus), after which 20 µL of 1.25 mg/ml of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was introduced into each well. Observations were made after 20 minutes for a purple coloration, which indicates growth. The minimum concentrations of the hydrazone derivatives and reference drugs that did not show color change in the wells were deemed to be the MIC values [21, 22]. The determinations were carried out in replicates.


## 2.2.3. Resistant Modulation Studies

For the modulation studies, the 96-well plates were filled with 125µL of double strength nutrient broth, and the same volume of 40 µL phenylhydrazones was added. Different concentrations in the ranges 50 µL/ml to 7.812 µL/ml and 15.625 µL/ml to 7.812 µL/ml of ciprofloxacin and fluconazole were, respectively, added. 25 µL containing 1 × 105 cfu of test organisms was added to each well, and the plates were incubated at 37°C (for 24 and 48 hours for bacteria and fungus, respectively), after which 20 µL of MTT was added to each well. The appearance of a change in color from cloudy wells to purple was recorded and compared with MICs of the reference drugs only [22, 23]. The determinations were carried out in replicates.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Structural Analysis of the Phenylhydrazones

The synthetic route employed for the synthesis of the compounds was followed by the standard condensation reaction between aldehydes or ketones and hydrazines, taking into consideration the commercial availability of the building blocks (Scheme 1). A retrosynthetic disconnection approach allowed us to identify various aldehydes and a ketone as key intermediates for the synthesis of the desired compounds. The process involves a rate-determining aromatic nucleophilic attack of 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine on the carbonyl in an acidified solution. This was followed by dehydration of the reactive intermediate to give the final product 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivative.Scheme 1
Synthetic procedures and reagents for compounds 1–6. Reagents and conditions: methanol/concentrated H2SO4 (98% v/v, 2 mL), 0–25°C, 24 h.The data for the synthetic procedures are included in the experimental section and interpreted according to the sequence: melting point range (Mpt.) in degree Celsius (°C), wavelength of maximum absorptionλmax from the ultraviolet-visible spectrum, infrared spectrum, 1H NMR [chemical shift, integral, multiplicity, coupling constant, and interpretation], 13C NMR, and HRMS as a confirmatory tool for SA5 (compound 5) (one of the most active compounds).


#### 3.1.1. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

The spectra for all the six compounds [refer to high resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrum (HRESIMS)] were determined in both the ultraviolet and visible wavelengths (200–800 nm) [23, 24] as a confirmatory tool for BP1 in the supplementary information using methanol as the blank. The absorption bands at 203 nm and 403 nm, which were obtained in the electronic spectra of the synthesized phenylhydrazones, can be credited to π−π∗ transitions, which are contributed by the various substituent auxochromes on the phenylhydrazones. Phenylhydrazones are known to be absorbed at various wavelengths within the UV-visible range [25, 26].For instance, compound BP1, when dissolved in methanol and scanned within the UV-visible region, showed absorption at 203 nm, 314 nm, and 382 nm which could be attributed to extensive conjugation in the phenylhydrazones after the coupling of benzophenone and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. However, compound BP1 showed maximum absorption at 382 nm, and this could be attributed to an increase in conjugation. Also, compounds BA2, MHB3, VL4, SA5, and DHB6 showed maximum absorption at 378 nm, 392 nm, 394 nm, 386 nm, and 403 nm, respectively, as observed in the supporting information.The extensive conjugation can be attributed to the presence of chromophores in the phenylhydrazones which include BP1 (two aromatic ring chromophores), MHB3 (meta hydroxy auxochrome), VL4 (a hydroxy and methoxy auxochrome), SA5 (ortho hydroxy auxochrome), and DHB6 (two hydroxy auxochromes). This suggests that the hydrazones with auxochromes and extra chromophore had extended conjugation leading to a shift in λmax to the right (bathochromic shift).


#### 3.1.2. Infrared Spectroscopy

The infrared spectrum gives an idea of the functional groups in a compound. From the infrared spectrum of compound 5 as a sample, the presence of broad band stretching from around 3300 cm−1 and sloping into the aliphatic CH region of around 3000 cm−1 indicates the presence of a hydroxy functional group, in this case that of a phenol as observed in the supporting information.It was also observed from the IR spectrum (supplementary information) that compounds like MHB3, VL4, SA5, and DHB6 showed sharp strong peak of their C = C stretching band in the region of 1138–1620 cm−1 compared to BP1 and BA2 which do not have the hydroxy function as shown in Table 1. The presence of the C = N, which is formed from the condensation reaction between the hydrazine and the carbonyls, was overlapped by aromatic sp2 hybridized carbons (C = C) in the benzene which vibrate at 1138–1640 cm−1 depending on the substituent attachments. Since C = N vibrational frequencies fall within 1580–1600 cm−1, their bands cannot be clearly distinguished in the presence of their aromatic C = C counterparts as shown in the experimental data.Table 1
Chemical structures and physical data of the synthesized phenylhydrazones.
CompoundsCodeColorMol. For.Mol. Wt. (g/mol)Yield (%)BP1Light orangeC19H14N4O4362.3485BA2Dark yellowC13H10N4O4286.2478MHB3Dark redC13H10N4O5302.2492VL4Bright redC14H12N4O6332.2770SA5Bright orangeC13H10N4O5302.2464DHB6Dark redC13H10N4O6318.2460


#### 3.1.3. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy

NMR determinations were performed for all the six synthesized phenylhydrazones using a one-dimensional (1D) NMR technique (1H and 13C) and two-dimensional NMR technique, distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer for quaternary carbons (DEPT-Q). These data are assigned to each compound in the experimental section. The structures were confirmed with 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and DEPT-Q spectral data as shown in the supplementary information for compounds BP1, BA2, MHB3, VL4, SA5, and DHB6, respectively. Considering DHB6 (compound 6), [4-(2-(2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazono) methyl) benzene-1, 3-diol] (Figure 2, Table 1), and from the proton NMR (supplementary information), a chemical shift showing resonance far downfield signified the presence of the hydroxy proton with a singlet signal. It resonated further downfield than the secondary amine proton because of the increased deshielding effect of the electronegative oxygen [27]. This chemical shift was slightly higher than that of the hydroxyl group (δ 9.94 ppm) because the former is closer to the chemical environment of the electronegative nitrogen atom in the imine bond. Hence, the first hydroxy singlet signal at δ 11.54 ppm was followed by a singlet signal secondary amino proton at δ 10.11 due to electronegativity of the nitrogen group before the other hydroxy signal. The aromatic proton sandwiched between two electronegative nitro groups was the next signal resonating downfield at δ 8.86 ppm. This was followed by the proton close to the tertiary amino group. The tertiary amino group attached to the imine proton caused deshielding and downfield resonating of imine protons at δ 8.86 ppm with a singlet signal. The lone proton closest to the nitro group at the para position was the next signal with a doublet peak at δ 7.95–7.97 ppm. The other lone proton closest to the less electronegative secondary amino group also gave a doublet signal at δ 7.64–7.66 ppm. The two other lone protons (one in between the diol and the other ortho to the imine bond) gave a multiplet signal at δ 7.52–7.54 ppm, while the proton closest to the para hydroxy group and two carbon bonds away from the imine group gave a doublet signal at δ 6.38 ppm.Figure 2
Chemical structure of DBH6 (compound 6) [4-(2-(2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazono) methyl) benzene-1, 3-diol].DEPT-Q is used for the differentiation of the primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary carbons. In DEPT-Q, the methyl (CH3) and methine (CH) signals appear up in the positive phase, while methylene (CH2) and quaternary signals appear down in the negative phase. The DEPT-Q spectrum of DHB6 (supplementary information) reveals the presence of upward carbon signals representing only six methine carbons in this case occurring at δ 161.8, 159.1, 148.2, 136.7, 130.1, and 112.0 confirming the aromatic methine carbons and seven quaternary carbons occurring at δ 148.2, 130.1, 129.2, 123.6, 116.9, 108.7, and 102.9. The DEPT-Q for the other compounds can be found in the supplementary information.


#### 3.1.4. Mass Spectroscopy

Mass spectroscopy is used for the determination of accurate molecular weights and fragmentation of compounds using ionization techniques [28]. Compound SA5 phenylhydrazone was one of the most active compounds after antimicrobial evaluation. From the electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrum, the molecular ion peak in negative mode was 301.0000 (M−H+) which is the actual mass having a tolerance range of 0.24 (0.41%) from the theoretical mass of 302.2400. This confirmed the molecular weight of compound SA5.The mass spectroscopy was used to confirm the molecular weight of one of the most active compounds and hence was not applied to the others.


## 3.1. Structural Analysis of the Phenylhydrazones

The synthetic route employed for the synthesis of the compounds was followed by the standard condensation reaction between aldehydes or ketones and hydrazines, taking into consideration the commercial availability of the building blocks (Scheme 1). A retrosynthetic disconnection approach allowed us to identify various aldehydes and a ketone as key intermediates for the synthesis of the desired compounds. The process involves a rate-determining aromatic nucleophilic attack of 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine on the carbonyl in an acidified solution. This was followed by dehydration of the reactive intermediate to give the final product 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivative.Scheme 1
Synthetic procedures and reagents for compounds 1–6. Reagents and conditions: methanol/concentrated H2SO4 (98% v/v, 2 mL), 0–25°C, 24 h.The data for the synthetic procedures are included in the experimental section and interpreted according to the sequence: melting point range (Mpt.) in degree Celsius (°C), wavelength of maximum absorptionλmax from the ultraviolet-visible spectrum, infrared spectrum, 1H NMR [chemical shift, integral, multiplicity, coupling constant, and interpretation], 13C NMR, and HRMS as a confirmatory tool for SA5 (compound 5) (one of the most active compounds).


### 3.1.1. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

The spectra for all the six compounds [refer to high resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrum (HRESIMS)] were determined in both the ultraviolet and visible wavelengths (200–800 nm) [23, 24] as a confirmatory tool for BP1 in the supplementary information using methanol as the blank. The absorption bands at 203 nm and 403 nm, which were obtained in the electronic spectra of the synthesized phenylhydrazones, can be credited to π−π∗ transitions, which are contributed by the various substituent auxochromes on the phenylhydrazones. Phenylhydrazones are known to be absorbed at various wavelengths within the UV-visible range [25, 26].For instance, compound BP1, when dissolved in methanol and scanned within the UV-visible region, showed absorption at 203 nm, 314 nm, and 382 nm which could be attributed to extensive conjugation in the phenylhydrazones after the coupling of benzophenone and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. However, compound BP1 showed maximum absorption at 382 nm, and this could be attributed to an increase in conjugation. Also, compounds BA2, MHB3, VL4, SA5, and DHB6 showed maximum absorption at 378 nm, 392 nm, 394 nm, 386 nm, and 403 nm, respectively, as observed in the supporting information.The extensive conjugation can be attributed to the presence of chromophores in the phenylhydrazones which include BP1 (two aromatic ring chromophores), MHB3 (meta hydroxy auxochrome), VL4 (a hydroxy and methoxy auxochrome), SA5 (ortho hydroxy auxochrome), and DHB6 (two hydroxy auxochromes). This suggests that the hydrazones with auxochromes and extra chromophore had extended conjugation leading to a shift in λmax to the right (bathochromic shift).


### 3.1.2. Infrared Spectroscopy

The infrared spectrum gives an idea of the functional groups in a compound. From the infrared spectrum of compound 5 as a sample, the presence of broad band stretching from around 3300 cm−1 and sloping into the aliphatic CH region of around 3000 cm−1 indicates the presence of a hydroxy functional group, in this case that of a phenol as observed in the supporting information.It was also observed from the IR spectrum (supplementary information) that compounds like MHB3, VL4, SA5, and DHB6 showed sharp strong peak of their C = C stretching band in the region of 1138–1620 cm−1 compared to BP1 and BA2 which do not have the hydroxy function as shown in Table 1. The presence of the C = N, which is formed from the condensation reaction between the hydrazine and the carbonyls, was overlapped by aromatic sp2 hybridized carbons (C = C) in the benzene which vibrate at 1138–1640 cm−1 depending on the substituent attachments. Since C = N vibrational frequencies fall within 1580–1600 cm−1, their bands cannot be clearly distinguished in the presence of their aromatic C = C counterparts as shown in the experimental data.Table 1
Chemical structures and physical data of the synthesized phenylhydrazones.
CompoundsCodeColorMol. For.Mol. Wt. (g/mol)Yield (%)BP1Light orangeC19H14N4O4362.3485BA2Dark yellowC13H10N4O4286.2478MHB3Dark redC13H10N4O5302.2492VL4Bright redC14H12N4O6332.2770SA5Bright orangeC13H10N4O5302.2464DHB6Dark redC13H10N4O6318.2460


### 3.1.3. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy

NMR determinations were performed for all the six synthesized phenylhydrazones using a one-dimensional (1D) NMR technique (1H and 13C) and two-dimensional NMR technique, distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer for quaternary carbons (DEPT-Q). These data are assigned to each compound in the experimental section. The structures were confirmed with 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and DEPT-Q spectral data as shown in the supplementary information for compounds BP1, BA2, MHB3, VL4, SA5, and DHB6, respectively. Considering DHB6 (compound 6), [4-(2-(2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazono) methyl) benzene-1, 3-diol] (Figure 2, Table 1), and from the proton NMR (supplementary information), a chemical shift showing resonance far downfield signified the presence of the hydroxy proton with a singlet signal. It resonated further downfield than the secondary amine proton because of the increased deshielding effect of the electronegative oxygen [27]. This chemical shift was slightly higher than that of the hydroxyl group (δ 9.94 ppm) because the former is closer to the chemical environment of the electronegative nitrogen atom in the imine bond. Hence, the first hydroxy singlet signal at δ 11.54 ppm was followed by a singlet signal secondary amino proton at δ 10.11 due to electronegativity of the nitrogen group before the other hydroxy signal. The aromatic proton sandwiched between two electronegative nitro groups was the next signal resonating downfield at δ 8.86 ppm. This was followed by the proton close to the tertiary amino group. The tertiary amino group attached to the imine proton caused deshielding and downfield resonating of imine protons at δ 8.86 ppm with a singlet signal. The lone proton closest to the nitro group at the para position was the next signal with a doublet peak at δ 7.95–7.97 ppm. The other lone proton closest to the less electronegative secondary amino group also gave a doublet signal at δ 7.64–7.66 ppm. The two other lone protons (one in between the diol and the other ortho to the imine bond) gave a multiplet signal at δ 7.52–7.54 ppm, while the proton closest to the para hydroxy group and two carbon bonds away from the imine group gave a doublet signal at δ 6.38 ppm.Figure 2
Chemical structure of DBH6 (compound 6) [4-(2-(2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazono) methyl) benzene-1, 3-diol].DEPT-Q is used for the differentiation of the primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary carbons. In DEPT-Q, the methyl (CH3) and methine (CH) signals appear up in the positive phase, while methylene (CH2) and quaternary signals appear down in the negative phase. The DEPT-Q spectrum of DHB6 (supplementary information) reveals the presence of upward carbon signals representing only six methine carbons in this case occurring at δ 161.8, 159.1, 148.2, 136.7, 130.1, and 112.0 confirming the aromatic methine carbons and seven quaternary carbons occurring at δ 148.2, 130.1, 129.2, 123.6, 116.9, 108.7, and 102.9. The DEPT-Q for the other compounds can be found in the supplementary information.


### 3.1.4. Mass Spectroscopy

Mass spectroscopy is used for the determination of accurate molecular weights and fragmentation of compounds using ionization techniques [28]. Compound SA5 phenylhydrazone was one of the most active compounds after antimicrobial evaluation. From the electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrum, the molecular ion peak in negative mode was 301.0000 (M−H+) which is the actual mass having a tolerance range of 0.24 (0.41%) from the theoretical mass of 302.2400. This confirmed the molecular weight of compound SA5.The mass spectroscopy was used to confirm the molecular weight of one of the most active compounds and hence was not applied to the others.


## 3.1.1. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

The spectra for all the six compounds [refer to high resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrum (HRESIMS)] were determined in both the ultraviolet and visible wavelengths (200–800 nm) [23, 24] as a confirmatory tool for BP1 in the supplementary information using methanol as the blank. The absorption bands at 203 nm and 403 nm, which were obtained in the electronic spectra of the synthesized phenylhydrazones, can be credited to π−π∗ transitions, which are contributed by the various substituent auxochromes on the phenylhydrazones. Phenylhydrazones are known to be absorbed at various wavelengths within the UV-visible range [25, 26].For instance, compound BP1, when dissolved in methanol and scanned within the UV-visible region, showed absorption at 203 nm, 314 nm, and 382 nm which could be attributed to extensive conjugation in the phenylhydrazones after the coupling of benzophenone and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. However, compound BP1 showed maximum absorption at 382 nm, and this could be attributed to an increase in conjugation. Also, compounds BA2, MHB3, VL4, SA5, and DHB6 showed maximum absorption at 378 nm, 392 nm, 394 nm, 386 nm, and 403 nm, respectively, as observed in the supporting information.The extensive conjugation can be attributed to the presence of chromophores in the phenylhydrazones which include BP1 (two aromatic ring chromophores), MHB3 (meta hydroxy auxochrome), VL4 (a hydroxy and methoxy auxochrome), SA5 (ortho hydroxy auxochrome), and DHB6 (two hydroxy auxochromes). This suggests that the hydrazones with auxochromes and extra chromophore had extended conjugation leading to a shift in λmax to the right (bathochromic shift).


## 3.1.2. Infrared Spectroscopy

The infrared spectrum gives an idea of the functional groups in a compound. From the infrared spectrum of compound 5 as a sample, the presence of broad band stretching from around 3300 cm−1 and sloping into the aliphatic CH region of around 3000 cm−1 indicates the presence of a hydroxy functional group, in this case that of a phenol as observed in the supporting information.It was also observed from the IR spectrum (supplementary information) that compounds like MHB3, VL4, SA5, and DHB6 showed sharp strong peak of their C = C stretching band in the region of 1138–1620 cm−1 compared to BP1 and BA2 which do not have the hydroxy function as shown in Table 1. The presence of the C = N, which is formed from the condensation reaction between the hydrazine and the carbonyls, was overlapped by aromatic sp2 hybridized carbons (C = C) in the benzene which vibrate at 1138–1640 cm−1 depending on the substituent attachments. Since C = N vibrational frequencies fall within 1580–1600 cm−1, their bands cannot be clearly distinguished in the presence of their aromatic C = C counterparts as shown in the experimental data.Table 1
Chemical structures and physical data of the synthesized phenylhydrazones.
CompoundsCodeColorMol. For.Mol. Wt. (g/mol)Yield (%)BP1Light orangeC19H14N4O4362.3485BA2Dark yellowC13H10N4O4286.2478MHB3Dark redC13H10N4O5302.2492VL4Bright redC14H12N4O6332.2770SA5Bright orangeC13H10N4O5302.2464DHB6Dark redC13H10N4O6318.2460


## 3.1.3. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy

NMR determinations were performed for all the six synthesized phenylhydrazones using a one-dimensional (1D) NMR technique (1H and 13C) and two-dimensional NMR technique, distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer for quaternary carbons (DEPT-Q). These data are assigned to each compound in the experimental section. The structures were confirmed with 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and DEPT-Q spectral data as shown in the supplementary information for compounds BP1, BA2, MHB3, VL4, SA5, and DHB6, respectively. Considering DHB6 (compound 6), [4-(2-(2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazono) methyl) benzene-1, 3-diol] (Figure 2, Table 1), and from the proton NMR (supplementary information), a chemical shift showing resonance far downfield signified the presence of the hydroxy proton with a singlet signal. It resonated further downfield than the secondary amine proton because of the increased deshielding effect of the electronegative oxygen [27]. This chemical shift was slightly higher than that of the hydroxyl group (δ 9.94 ppm) because the former is closer to the chemical environment of the electronegative nitrogen atom in the imine bond. Hence, the first hydroxy singlet signal at δ 11.54 ppm was followed by a singlet signal secondary amino proton at δ 10.11 due to electronegativity of the nitrogen group before the other hydroxy signal. The aromatic proton sandwiched between two electronegative nitro groups was the next signal resonating downfield at δ 8.86 ppm. This was followed by the proton close to the tertiary amino group. The tertiary amino group attached to the imine proton caused deshielding and downfield resonating of imine protons at δ 8.86 ppm with a singlet signal. The lone proton closest to the nitro group at the para position was the next signal with a doublet peak at δ 7.95–7.97 ppm. The other lone proton closest to the less electronegative secondary amino group also gave a doublet signal at δ 7.64–7.66 ppm. The two other lone protons (one in between the diol and the other ortho to the imine bond) gave a multiplet signal at δ 7.52–7.54 ppm, while the proton closest to the para hydroxy group and two carbon bonds away from the imine group gave a doublet signal at δ 6.38 ppm.Figure 2
Chemical structure of DBH6 (compound 6) [4-(2-(2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazono) methyl) benzene-1, 3-diol].DEPT-Q is used for the differentiation of the primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary carbons. In DEPT-Q, the methyl (CH3) and methine (CH) signals appear up in the positive phase, while methylene (CH2) and quaternary signals appear down in the negative phase. The DEPT-Q spectrum of DHB6 (supplementary information) reveals the presence of upward carbon signals representing only six methine carbons in this case occurring at δ 161.8, 159.1, 148.2, 136.7, 130.1, and 112.0 confirming the aromatic methine carbons and seven quaternary carbons occurring at δ 148.2, 130.1, 129.2, 123.6, 116.9, 108.7, and 102.9. The DEPT-Q for the other compounds can be found in the supplementary information.


## 3.1.4. Mass Spectroscopy

Mass spectroscopy is used for the determination of accurate molecular weights and fragmentation of compounds using ionization techniques [28]. Compound SA5 phenylhydrazone was one of the most active compounds after antimicrobial evaluation. From the electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrum, the molecular ion peak in negative mode was 301.0000 (M−H+) which is the actual mass having a tolerance range of 0.24 (0.41%) from the theoretical mass of 302.2400. This confirmed the molecular weight of compound SA5.The mass spectroscopy was used to confirm the molecular weight of one of the most active compounds and hence was not applied to the others.


## 4. Antimicrobial Evaluation

### 4.1. Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs)

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is the least concentration of an antimicrobial agent that would inhibit the visible growth of the pathogen after 24 h (bacteria) and 48 h (fungi) incubation [28]. The MICs of the phenylhydrazones and two standard antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and fluconazole) were evaluated with the microbroth dilution test against a panel of six pathogenic microorganisms: Gram-negatives [P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), E. coli (ATCC 25922), K. pneumoniae (clinical)], Gram-positives [S. aureus (ATCC 25923), S. pneumoniae (clinical strain)], and C. albicans (fungus, clinical strain).All the compounds showed weak antimicrobial activity against test organisms at test concentrations as observed in Table2. BP1 showed the highest antimicrobial activity among the six compounds against the selected test organisms. BA2, however, had the least antimicrobial activity with MIC of 699 µM against the entire test organisms. MHB3 had MIC of 562 µM against C. albicans and 662 µM and above against the rest of the test organisms. VL4 recorded an MIC of 602 µM against all test organisms except S. pneumoniae (MIC = 300 µM). The MICs of SA5 against S. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae were 165 µM and 331 µM, respectively, while for S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and C. albicans it had a higher MIC of 662 µM. DHB6 showed activity against S. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae, and C. albicans with MIC of 314 µM, while for S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa it had MIC of 628 µM and above. The reference antibacterial drug used was ciprofloxacin, and the MICs recorded were 2.36 µM against P.aeruginosa, S. pneumoniae, and K. pneumoniae, while 4.72 µM was recorded against S. aureus and E. coli. The reference antifungal drug used was fluconazole, and the MIC obtained was 327 µM against C. albicans. The MIC of the phenylhydrazones against the two Gram-negative organisms ranged from 552 µM to 699 µM, while the standard ciprofloxacin was at 4.72 and 2.36 µM, respectively (Table 2).Table 2
Antimicrobial activity of the compounds against the panel of organisms.
Test organismsMinimum inhibitory concentrations (µM) of the phenylhydrazonesBP1BA2MHB3VL4SA5DHB6CPRFLZStaphylococcus aureus (+)>552699>662602662>6284.72NdStreptococcus pneumoniae (+)552699>662300.961653142.36NdEscherichia coli (−)>552699>6626026626284.72NdPseudomonas aeruginosa (−)>552>699>6626026626282.36NdKlebsiella pneumoniae (−)138699>6626023313142.36NdCandida albicans552699>562602662314Nd327BP1 [benzophenone derivative], BA2 [benzaldehyde derivative], MHB3 [m-hydroxy benzaldehyde], VL4 [vanillin derivative], SA5 [salicylaldehyde derivative], DHB6 [2, 4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde derivative]; standard antibiotics: CPR [ciprofloxacin] and FLZ [fluconazole]. Nd [not determined]. All tests were carried out in triplicate (n = 3).


### 4.2. Resistant Modulation Activity

The tendency of the phenylhydrazones at sub-MICs to improve the activities of some commercial antibiotics against known resistant strains was investigated through the resistant modulation test. From Tables2 and 3, BP1 (compound 1) with sub-MIC of 50 µM against S. pneumoniae lowered the MIC of ciprofloxacin from 2.36 to 1.078 µM representing 54.32% reduction in the MIC of the ciprofloxacin. BP1 also improved the performance of the ciprofloxacin at sub-MIC of 50 µM against K. pneumoniae from 2.36 µM to 1.078 µM representing 54.32% reduction in the MIC of the antibiotics. Again, BP1 modulated the activity of fluconazole against C. albicans from 327 to 2.156 µM representing 99.34% reduction in the MIC of the fluconazole. Similarly, BA2 improved the activity of ciprofloxacin against S. pneumoniae and reduced the MIC of ciprofloxacin from 2.36 to 1.36 µM showing 42.37% reduction. In addition, BA2 also modulated the activity of fluconazole at sub-MIC of 50 µM against C. albicans and caused a reduction in its MIC from 327 to 1.23 µM which is indicative of 99.6% reduction in the MIC.Table 3
Resistant modulatory activity of the compounds against the panel of organisms.
Test organismsMinimum inhibitory concentrations (µM) of the phenylhydrazonesBP1BA2MHB3VL4SA5DHB6CPRFLZStaphylococcus aureus (+)>13887.3165>150>165>1574.72—Streptococcus pneumoniae (+)1.0781.361.291.1761.291.232.36—Escherichia coli (−)>138>175>165>150>165>1574.72—Pseudomonas aeruginosa (−)>17.287.382.775.22.5839.32.36—Klebsiella pneumoniae (−)1.0785.461.291.1761.291.232.36—Candida albicans2.1562735.1091.1761.291.23—327MHB3 modulated the activity of the ciprofloxacin againstS. pneumoniae and Klebsiella pneumoniae causing a reduction in the MIC of antibiotics from 2.36 to 1.29 µM. This decrease in the MIC indicated a reduction of 45.33%. MHB3 also showed the modulation of the activity of fluconazole at sub-MIC of 50 µM against Candida albicans and lowered the MIC to 5.109 from 327 µM indicating a maximum reduction of 98.43%. VL4 enhanced the performance of ciprofloxacin at sub-MIC of 50 µM against S. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae. The MIC of the antibiotic decreased from 2.36 to 1.176 µM. in both instances. This decrease in MIC depicted 50.17% reduction. VL4 again modulated the performance of fluconazole at sub-MIC of 50 µM against C. albicans and lowered the MIC to 1.176 µM from 327 µM, which showed a maximum reduction of 99.64%.In addition, compound 5 (SA5) modulated the activity of the ciprofloxacin at sub-MIC of 50µM against S. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae. The MIC was lowered from 2.36 to 1.29 µM in both cases resulting in 45.34% reduction. SA5 again modulated the performance of fluconazole at sub-MIC of 50 µM against C. albicans and suppressed its MIC from 327 to 1.29 µM, indicating a good reduction of 99.61%. DHB6 (compound 6) also modulated the activity of ciprofloxacin at sub-MIC of 50 µM against S. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae and lowered its MIC from 2.36 to 1.23 µM in both instances representing 47.88% reduction in the MIC. DHB6 also modulated the activity of fluconazole at sub-MIC of 50 µM against C. albicans and lowered its MIC from 327 µM to 1.23 µM representing 99.62% reduction in MIC. SA5 and BP1 were better than the other four phenylhydrazones in resistance modulatory activity together with ciprofloxacin which had MIC of 2.58 µM against P.aeruginosa, followed by BP1 (17.2 µM). Hence, the presence of an ortho hydroxy group in SA5 and aromatic ketone group might be essential for resistant modulatory activity in combination with ciprofloxacin against Gram-negative P.aeruginosa and E. coli. Furthermore, the presence of meta hydroxy group (MHB3), a hydroxy and methoxy (VL4), and absence of a substituent on the benzaldehyde portion of BA2 also improved activity and could be considered for future drug development. K. pneumoniae, the other Gram-negative counterpart which causes serious infections, was more susceptible to the phenylhydrazones at 138 to 699 µM. By the combination of subinhibitory concentrations of the phenylhydrazones with ciprofloxacin, the resistance barrier of K. pneumoniae was reduced allowing for a far lower MIC of 1.078 from 5.46 µM, a trend that is more impressive than that of P. aeruginosa and E.coli.The phenylhydrazones had similar activity against the Gram-positive organisms ranging from 87.3 to 699µM which is also evident of the resistant properties of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae.


## 4.1. Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs)

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is the least concentration of an antimicrobial agent that would inhibit the visible growth of the pathogen after 24 h (bacteria) and 48 h (fungi) incubation [28]. The MICs of the phenylhydrazones and two standard antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and fluconazole) were evaluated with the microbroth dilution test against a panel of six pathogenic microorganisms: Gram-negatives [P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), E. coli (ATCC 25922), K. pneumoniae (clinical)], Gram-positives [S. aureus (ATCC 25923), S. pneumoniae (clinical strain)], and C. albicans (fungus, clinical strain).All the compounds showed weak antimicrobial activity against test organisms at test concentrations as observed in Table2. BP1 showed the highest antimicrobial activity among the six compounds against the selected test organisms. BA2, however, had the least antimicrobial activity with MIC of 699 µM against the entire test organisms. MHB3 had MIC of 562 µM against C. albicans and 662 µM and above against the rest of the test organisms. VL4 recorded an MIC of 602 µM against all test organisms except S. pneumoniae (MIC = 300 µM). The MICs of SA5 against S. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae were 165 µM and 331 µM, respectively, while for S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and C. albicans it had a higher MIC of 662 µM. DHB6 showed activity against S. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae, and C. albicans with MIC of 314 µM, while for S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa it had MIC of 628 µM and above. The reference antibacterial drug used was ciprofloxacin, and the MICs recorded were 2.36 µM against P.aeruginosa, S. pneumoniae, and K. pneumoniae, while 4.72 µM was recorded against S. aureus and E. coli. The reference antifungal drug used was fluconazole, and the MIC obtained was 327 µM against C. albicans. The MIC of the phenylhydrazones against the two Gram-negative organisms ranged from 552 µM to 699 µM, while the standard ciprofloxacin was at 4.72 and 2.36 µM, respectively (Table 2).Table 2
Antimicrobial activity of the compounds against the panel of organisms.
Test organismsMinimum inhibitory concentrations (µM) of the phenylhydrazonesBP1BA2MHB3VL4SA5DHB6CPRFLZStaphylococcus aureus (+)>552699>662602662>6284.72NdStreptococcus pneumoniae (+)552699>662300.961653142.36NdEscherichia coli (−)>552699>6626026626284.72NdPseudomonas aeruginosa (−)>552>699>6626026626282.36NdKlebsiella pneumoniae (−)138699>6626023313142.36NdCandida albicans552699>562602662314Nd327BP1 [benzophenone derivative], BA2 [benzaldehyde derivative], MHB3 [m-hydroxy benzaldehyde], VL4 [vanillin derivative], SA5 [salicylaldehyde derivative], DHB6 [2, 4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde derivative]; standard antibiotics: CPR [ciprofloxacin] and FLZ [fluconazole]. Nd [not determined]. All tests were carried out in triplicate (n = 3).


## 4.2. Resistant Modulation Activity

The tendency of the phenylhydrazones at sub-MICs to improve the activities of some commercial antibiotics against known resistant strains was investigated through the resistant modulation test. From Tables2 and 3, BP1 (compound 1) with sub-MIC of 50 µM against S. pneumoniae lowered the MIC of ciprofloxacin from 2.36 to 1.078 µM representing 54.32% reduction in the MIC of the ciprofloxacin. BP1 also improved the performance of the ciprofloxacin at sub-MIC of 50 µM against K. pneumoniae from 2.36 µM to 1.078 µM representing 54.32% reduction in the MIC of the antibiotics. Again, BP1 modulated the activity of fluconazole against C. albicans from 327 to 2.156 µM representing 99.34% reduction in the MIC of the fluconazole. Similarly, BA2 improved the activity of ciprofloxacin against S. pneumoniae and reduced the MIC of ciprofloxacin from 2.36 to 1.36 µM showing 42.37% reduction. In addition, BA2 also modulated the activity of fluconazole at sub-MIC of 50 µM against C. albicans and caused a reduction in its MIC from 327 to 1.23 µM which is indicative of 99.6% reduction in the MIC.Table 3
Resistant modulatory activity of the compounds against the panel of organisms.
Test organismsMinimum inhibitory concentrations (µM) of the phenylhydrazonesBP1BA2MHB3VL4SA5DHB6CPRFLZStaphylococcus aureus (+)>13887.3165>150>165>1574.72—Streptococcus pneumoniae (+)1.0781.361.291.1761.291.232.36—Escherichia coli (−)>138>175>165>150>165>1574.72—Pseudomonas aeruginosa (−)>17.287.382.775.22.5839.32.36—Klebsiella pneumoniae (−)1.0785.461.291.1761.291.232.36—Candida albicans2.1562735.1091.1761.291.23—327MHB3 modulated the activity of the ciprofloxacin againstS. pneumoniae and Klebsiella pneumoniae causing a reduction in the MIC of antibiotics from 2.36 to 1.29 µM. This decrease in the MIC indicated a reduction of 45.33%. MHB3 also showed the modulation of the activity of fluconazole at sub-MIC of 50 µM against Candida albicans and lowered the MIC to 5.109 from 327 µM indicating a maximum reduction of 98.43%. VL4 enhanced the performance of ciprofloxacin at sub-MIC of 50 µM against S. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae. The MIC of the antibiotic decreased from 2.36 to 1.176 µM. in both instances. This decrease in MIC depicted 50.17% reduction. VL4 again modulated the performance of fluconazole at sub-MIC of 50 µM against C. albicans and lowered the MIC to 1.176 µM from 327 µM, which showed a maximum reduction of 99.64%.In addition, compound 5 (SA5) modulated the activity of the ciprofloxacin at sub-MIC of 50µM against S. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae. The MIC was lowered from 2.36 to 1.29 µM in both cases resulting in 45.34% reduction. SA5 again modulated the performance of fluconazole at sub-MIC of 50 µM against C. albicans and suppressed its MIC from 327 to 1.29 µM, indicating a good reduction of 99.61%. DHB6 (compound 6) also modulated the activity of ciprofloxacin at sub-MIC of 50 µM against S. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae and lowered its MIC from 2.36 to 1.23 µM in both instances representing 47.88% reduction in the MIC. DHB6 also modulated the activity of fluconazole at sub-MIC of 50 µM against C. albicans and lowered its MIC from 327 µM to 1.23 µM representing 99.62% reduction in MIC. SA5 and BP1 were better than the other four phenylhydrazones in resistance modulatory activity together with ciprofloxacin which had MIC of 2.58 µM against P.aeruginosa, followed by BP1 (17.2 µM). Hence, the presence of an ortho hydroxy group in SA5 and aromatic ketone group might be essential for resistant modulatory activity in combination with ciprofloxacin against Gram-negative P.aeruginosa and E. coli. Furthermore, the presence of meta hydroxy group (MHB3), a hydroxy and methoxy (VL4), and absence of a substituent on the benzaldehyde portion of BA2 also improved activity and could be considered for future drug development. K. pneumoniae, the other Gram-negative counterpart which causes serious infections, was more susceptible to the phenylhydrazones at 138 to 699 µM. By the combination of subinhibitory concentrations of the phenylhydrazones with ciprofloxacin, the resistance barrier of K. pneumoniae was reduced allowing for a far lower MIC of 1.078 from 5.46 µM, a trend that is more impressive than that of P. aeruginosa and E.coli.The phenylhydrazones had similar activity against the Gram-positive organisms ranging from 87.3 to 699µM which is also evident of the resistant properties of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae.


## 5. Conclusion

A library of six novel phenylhydrazones was successfully synthesized and characterized: 1-(2, 4-dinitrophenyl)-2-(diphenylmethylene) hydrazine [BP1], 1-benzylidene-2-(2, 4-dinitrophenyl) hydrazine [BA2], 3-(2–2-(4-dinitrophenyl) hydrazono) methylphenol, 4-(2-(2, 4-dinitrophenyl) hydrazono) methyl)-2-methoxyphenol [VL4], (Z)-2-(2, 4-dinitrophenyl) hydrazono) methylphenol [SA5], and 4-(2-(2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazono) methyl) benzene-1, 3-diol.As part of future drug design and optimization, the phenylhydrazones can be considered as structural backbones due to their synthetic feasibility and good yield. The compounds exhibited weak antimicrobial property but demonstrated strong resistant modulating action when combined with the standard drugs. The activities of the standards improved significantly with a good reduction in the MIC values.



---

*Source: 2720697-2020-10-07.xml*