# Midazolam Suppresses Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Metastasis and Enhances Apoptosis by Elevating miR-217

Authors: Qian Shen; Yanqiong Xia; Leilei Yang; Bo Wang; Jian Peng
Journal: Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Background. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant cause of human death in the world. Recently, it is found that midazolam can modulate miRs to participate in HCC progression. This research project was designed to elucidate the impacts of midazolam and miR-217 on HCC cell metastasis and apoptosis. Methods. Human HCC cell strains (Hep3B and SK-HEP-1) were selected and intervened by midazolam at different concentrations in our research. miR-217-inhibitor intervened in the two HCC cell strains to observe the alterations of cell migration, invasiveness, and apoptosis. The miR-217 level in HCC cells was identified by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Results. As midazolam concentration was elevated, Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 viabilities were more obviously suppressed. The 10 μg/mL concentration was selected for analysis since Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 had an IC50 of 10.57 μg/mL and 9.35 μg/m, respectively. The qRT-PCR results showed the decreased of miR-217 in HCC cells, which was enhanced notably by midazolam intervention. Compared with the blank group, the invasiveness and migration (Transwell assay) of miR-217-inhibitor-transfected HCC cells were distinctly enhanced and the apoptosis rate (flow cytometry) was noticeably reduced. Conclusion. Midazolam can upregulate miR-217 in HCC cells, thus inhibiting HCC cell metastasis and apoptosis.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Liver cancer (LC) is a prevalent gastrointestinal malignancy [1]. According to the survey, more than 800,000 people are diagnosed with LC each year and 700,000 dies [2]. Preinvasive liver cancer is consisted of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma, and mixed primary carcinoma of the liver. Clinically, HCC is the main type of LC, which accounts for 90% of total LC cases [3]. Some progress has been made in the clinical treatment of HCC [4–6]. Surgery with chemoradiotherapy is an important mean to treat HCC clinically, which, however, still leads to disappointing 5-year survival in some patients [7]. Given the atypical clinical presentations of early HCC and the failure of most patients to receive timely treatment derived from the low prevalence rate of early diagnosis of HCC [8], it is urgent to find the potential therapeutic targets of HCC and explore its specific mechanism.MicroRNAs (miRs) are small, highly conserved noncoding RNA molecules involved in the regulation of gene expression. miRs have 18-25 nucleotides, 19-25 base-long highly conserved endogenous noncoding hairpin nucleotide transcripts. The miRs combine with the target genes’ 3′UTR via complementary pairing and thus degrade or inhibit the target gene expression [7]. miR-217, located at 2p16.1 of human chromosome, is a miRNA that suppresses cell multiplication and has an inhibitory action on the growth and development of a myriad of various cells [9, 10]. Downregulation of miR-217 alleviates atherosclerosis by targeting sirtuin 1 [11]. And miR-217 also inhibits endothelial cell apoptosis by targeting intracellular chloride channel 4 [12]. miRNAs are associated with reduced inflammation [13]. Since malignancy is also related to inflammation [14], the beneficial effects of mRNAs on cancer could be lowered by lowering the inflammatory burden in the tumor microenvironment [15]. It has been shown that miR-217 was closely linked to the multiplication and migration of tumor cells [16]. For example, in the research of Zhu et al., miR-217 can inhibit cervical cancer cell migration and invasiveness via modulating MAPK1 [17]. Another research has found that the low miR-217 expression in HCC reduces HCC cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis [18]. Midazolam (MZ), a sedative and anesthetic inducer extensively applied in the clinic, is a derivative of benzodiazepine. In animal experiments, MZ has reported to damage the exercise ability of animals and cause muscle relaxation [19]. While recently, MZ is reported to induce apoptosis in human cancer cells and block tumor growth in xenotransplantation mice [20], as well as to modulate miRs [21]. Nonetheless, there is no research to verify whether MZ can inhibit HCC cells and regulate miR-217.Accordingly, this study mainly explores the impacts of MZ on HCC cell growth and progression and further investigates the possible regulatory connection between MZ and miR-217.


## 2. Methods and Materials

### 2.1. Cell Source

In a 37°C and 5% CO2 incubator, Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 of HCC cell strains and THLE-2 of human hepatocyte line all provided by ATCC (Virginia, US) were immersed in 10% FBS-containing EMEM (Gibco) for culture. The cells were moved to renewed culture medium every two days and passaged when the cell fusion got to 80-90%. Cells in logarithmic growth phase observed after 2-3 subcultures were collected for further research.


### 2.2. Cell Processing

Logarithmic growth phased Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 were selected for transfection using the Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, US). The inhibitor and blank control of miR-217 were offered by GenePharma (Suzhou, CHN). Transfection was carried out with Lipofectamine 2000 in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with 100 pmol miR-217-inhibitor or control when the cells fused to about 60%. Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 were harvested after transfection for 24-48 h.


### 2.3. Grouping

MZ were purchased from Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland. According to the experimental requirements, HCC cells were intervened by MZ at different concentrations. The mean of half inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 10μg/mL was selected as the optimal concentration for the experimental intervention to study the connection between MZ, miR-217, and HCC. We further divided the two groups of cells into eight groups, namely, blank group (cells were conducted without any treatment), MZ group, miR-217-inhibitor group, and MZ+miR-217-inhibitor group, to further observe cell biological function alterations.


### 2.4. qRT-PCR Experiment

The total RNA of the cells was extracted by TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The OD value and RNA concentration were measured by ultraviolet spectroscopy and NanoDrop2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA); the value of RNAA260 nm/A280 nm between 1.8 and 2.0 indicated a well purity of RNA. Provided by Beijing Transgen, CHN, the TransScript Green miRNA Two-Step qRT-PCR SuperMix (AQ202-01) was used to reverse-transcribe the extracted total RNA as instructed by the kit instructions. The resultant cDNA was collected for PCR amplification experiments. The qPCR amplification system (20μL) was composed of 1 μL of cDNA, 0.4 μL each of upstream and downstream primers, 10 μL of 2x TransTaq® Tip Green qPCR SuperMix, 0.4 μL of passive reference dye (50x), and appropriate ddH2O. qPCR amplification parameters (40 cycles): 94°C, 30 s; 94°C, 5 s; 60°C, 30 s. The sample and replicate well were set at 1 : 3, and the test was run in triplicate. Sense and antisense primers for miR-217 and U6 were 5′-TACTCAACTCACTACTGCATCAGG-3′, 5′-TATGGTTGTTCTGCTCTCTGTGTC-3′, and 5′-CGCTTCGGCAGCACATATAC-3′, 5′-CAGGGGCCATGCTAATCTT-3′. Data analysis was done by 2-ΔΔct [22].


### 2.5. MTT Detection

Cells were digested with trypsin and immersed in DMEM (10% FBS) to prepare cell suspension. Then, cells (8×103 cells/mL) were planted in 96-well plates at 100 μL cell suspension per well. The main medium was discarded after 24 h of cultivation but was replaced with 90 μL blank cell culture medium/well and 5, 10, and 20 μg/mL MZ, respectively. The inoculated cells were cultivated at 37°C for 4 h and cultivated with 10 μg [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] (MTT) solution for 4 h. Calculation of optical density (OD) value at 450 nm was performed in each group to compare the MTT values. After determining the best concentration of MZ affecting HepG2 cells, follow-up experiments were carried out.


### 2.6. Transwell Detection

Transwell assay was used to evaluate the alterations of cell invasiveness and migration in each group. Invasiveness experiment: placed on the sterile 24-well plates, each of the Transwell chambers was added with 100μL Matrigel (deliquated with precooled high-sugar DMEM (serum-free) at 1 : 10) for 24 h of cultivation at 37°C. The transfected cell suspension was deliquated with serum-free medium and 10% FBS-containing medium, respectively. Then, a cell suspension (1×106 cells/mL, deliquated with serum-free medium) was placed into the apical compartment, and 600 μL of 10% FBS-containing medium was put into the basolateral compartment for culture in an incubator. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were processed for paraformaldehyde (4%) immobilization for 20 min, crystal violet (0.1%) staining, and two rinses with clear water. Finally, cell invasiveness was observed under a microscope. The migration test was basically the same as the invasiveness test except that Transwell did not add Matrigel. Eight random fields were selected under a microscope (magnification: ×200) for cell counting, and the invasive and migratory cells in each group were averaged.


### 2.7. Apoptosis Detection

Cell apoptosis was detected using the pi staining, a method described previously [23]. Briefly, cells were collected 48 h after transfection and then were digested with trypsin and made to 1×106, followed by overnight immobilization with precooled ethanol (70%) at 4°C. They were then cultivated in a 37°C water bath for 30 min after mixing with RNAse (10 μg/mL) and then cultured at 4°C for 30 min after the addition of PI (final concentration 10 μg/mL). The apoptosis of cells after 30 min of staining was observed by FACSCalibur flow cytometry. The percent apoptotic cells were estimated by normalizing the total cells to 100% and then calculate the apoptotic cells from the normalized total cells.


### 2.8. Statistical Processing

GraphPad PRISM 6.0 and SPSS 20.0 have been employed to analyze the data. Independent samplest-test and one-way ANOVA (F) and LSD-t post hoc test are used to implement intergroup and multiple group comparisons. Those of multitime point expression profiles employed repeated measures ANOVA (F) and Bonferroni post hoc test. Data are presented as mean (SD), and the experimented were triplicated as indicated in the figure legend. The significance level was taken as P<0.05.


## 2.1. Cell Source

In a 37°C and 5% CO2 incubator, Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 of HCC cell strains and THLE-2 of human hepatocyte line all provided by ATCC (Virginia, US) were immersed in 10% FBS-containing EMEM (Gibco) for culture. The cells were moved to renewed culture medium every two days and passaged when the cell fusion got to 80-90%. Cells in logarithmic growth phase observed after 2-3 subcultures were collected for further research.


## 2.2. Cell Processing

Logarithmic growth phased Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 were selected for transfection using the Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, US). The inhibitor and blank control of miR-217 were offered by GenePharma (Suzhou, CHN). Transfection was carried out with Lipofectamine 2000 in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with 100 pmol miR-217-inhibitor or control when the cells fused to about 60%. Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 were harvested after transfection for 24-48 h.


## 2.3. Grouping

MZ were purchased from Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland. According to the experimental requirements, HCC cells were intervened by MZ at different concentrations. The mean of half inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 10μg/mL was selected as the optimal concentration for the experimental intervention to study the connection between MZ, miR-217, and HCC. We further divided the two groups of cells into eight groups, namely, blank group (cells were conducted without any treatment), MZ group, miR-217-inhibitor group, and MZ+miR-217-inhibitor group, to further observe cell biological function alterations.


## 2.4. qRT-PCR Experiment

The total RNA of the cells was extracted by TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The OD value and RNA concentration were measured by ultraviolet spectroscopy and NanoDrop2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA); the value of RNAA260 nm/A280 nm between 1.8 and 2.0 indicated a well purity of RNA. Provided by Beijing Transgen, CHN, the TransScript Green miRNA Two-Step qRT-PCR SuperMix (AQ202-01) was used to reverse-transcribe the extracted total RNA as instructed by the kit instructions. The resultant cDNA was collected for PCR amplification experiments. The qPCR amplification system (20μL) was composed of 1 μL of cDNA, 0.4 μL each of upstream and downstream primers, 10 μL of 2x TransTaq® Tip Green qPCR SuperMix, 0.4 μL of passive reference dye (50x), and appropriate ddH2O. qPCR amplification parameters (40 cycles): 94°C, 30 s; 94°C, 5 s; 60°C, 30 s. The sample and replicate well were set at 1 : 3, and the test was run in triplicate. Sense and antisense primers for miR-217 and U6 were 5′-TACTCAACTCACTACTGCATCAGG-3′, 5′-TATGGTTGTTCTGCTCTCTGTGTC-3′, and 5′-CGCTTCGGCAGCACATATAC-3′, 5′-CAGGGGCCATGCTAATCTT-3′. Data analysis was done by 2-ΔΔct [22].


## 2.5. MTT Detection

Cells were digested with trypsin and immersed in DMEM (10% FBS) to prepare cell suspension. Then, cells (8×103 cells/mL) were planted in 96-well plates at 100 μL cell suspension per well. The main medium was discarded after 24 h of cultivation but was replaced with 90 μL blank cell culture medium/well and 5, 10, and 20 μg/mL MZ, respectively. The inoculated cells were cultivated at 37°C for 4 h and cultivated with 10 μg [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] (MTT) solution for 4 h. Calculation of optical density (OD) value at 450 nm was performed in each group to compare the MTT values. After determining the best concentration of MZ affecting HepG2 cells, follow-up experiments were carried out.


## 2.6. Transwell Detection

Transwell assay was used to evaluate the alterations of cell invasiveness and migration in each group. Invasiveness experiment: placed on the sterile 24-well plates, each of the Transwell chambers was added with 100μL Matrigel (deliquated with precooled high-sugar DMEM (serum-free) at 1 : 10) for 24 h of cultivation at 37°C. The transfected cell suspension was deliquated with serum-free medium and 10% FBS-containing medium, respectively. Then, a cell suspension (1×106 cells/mL, deliquated with serum-free medium) was placed into the apical compartment, and 600 μL of 10% FBS-containing medium was put into the basolateral compartment for culture in an incubator. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were processed for paraformaldehyde (4%) immobilization for 20 min, crystal violet (0.1%) staining, and two rinses with clear water. Finally, cell invasiveness was observed under a microscope. The migration test was basically the same as the invasiveness test except that Transwell did not add Matrigel. Eight random fields were selected under a microscope (magnification: ×200) for cell counting, and the invasive and migratory cells in each group were averaged.


## 2.7. Apoptosis Detection

Cell apoptosis was detected using the pi staining, a method described previously [23]. Briefly, cells were collected 48 h after transfection and then were digested with trypsin and made to 1×106, followed by overnight immobilization with precooled ethanol (70%) at 4°C. They were then cultivated in a 37°C water bath for 30 min after mixing with RNAse (10 μg/mL) and then cultured at 4°C for 30 min after the addition of PI (final concentration 10 μg/mL). The apoptosis of cells after 30 min of staining was observed by FACSCalibur flow cytometry. The percent apoptotic cells were estimated by normalizing the total cells to 100% and then calculate the apoptotic cells from the normalized total cells.


## 2.8. Statistical Processing

GraphPad PRISM 6.0 and SPSS 20.0 have been employed to analyze the data. Independent samplest-test and one-way ANOVA (F) and LSD-t post hoc test are used to implement intergroup and multiple group comparisons. Those of multitime point expression profiles employed repeated measures ANOVA (F) and Bonferroni post hoc test. Data are presented as mean (SD), and the experimented were triplicated as indicated in the figure legend. The significance level was taken as P<0.05.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Impact of MZ on HCC Cell Viability

The effects of MZ on the growth of HCC cells were assessed. HepG2 cells were cocultured with different concentrations of Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 of HCC. It was found that HCC cell viability was more inhibited as MZ concentration increased (Figures1(a) and 1(c)). The mean of half inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 10 μg/mL was selected as the optimal concentration for the experimental intervention, to study the connection between MZ, miR-217, and HCC. IC50 results showed that Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 had a IC50 of 10.57 μg/mL and 9.35 μg/mL, respectively (Figures 1(b) and 1(d)), so we chose the concentration of 10 μg/mL for subsequent analysis through calculation. The results unraveled that MZ could evidently suppress the viability of HCC cells, and there existed significant difference among the control group and the groups in which the cells were treated with different concentrations of Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 of HCC.Figure 1
Effect of midazolam on HCC cell viability. (a) Effect of midazolam on Hep3B cytotoxicity. (b) Midazolam IC50 of Hep3B. (c) Effect of midazolam on SK-HEP-1 cytotoxicity. (d) Midazolam IC50 of SK-HEP-1. The mean of half inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 10μg/mL was selected as the optimal concentration for the experimental intervention, to study the connection between MZ, miR-217, and HCC. Data are presented as mean (SD), and the experimented were triplicated.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


### 3.2. Impact of MZ on HCC Cell Metastasis and Apoptosis

A previous study showed that MZ at low concentration can induce apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells, while inducing cell necrosis at high concentration [24]. However, the effect of MZ on HCC cell metastasis and apoptosis is not clear. Through toxicity test, we confirmed MZ’s ability to suppress HCC cell viability. Further, we observed MZ’s influence on HCC cell metastasis and apoptosis. We employed Transwell test and flow cytometer to analyze the alterations of HCC cell invasiveness, migration, and apoptosis following 10 μg/mL MZ intervention. The experimental results MZ revealed notably reduced invasiveness and migration (Figures 2(a)–2(c), P<0.01) and noticeably enhanced apoptosis (Figure 2(c), P<0.05) of HCC cells following MZ intervention compared with the blank group. This suggests that MZ has the ability to inhibit HCC cell metastasis and induce apoptosis.Figure 2
Effect of midazolam on metastasis and apoptosis of HCC cells. (a) Effect of midazolam on invasion ability of HCC cells by Transwell. (b) Effect of midazolam on migration ability of HCC cells by Transwell. (c) Effect of midazolam on apoptosis rate of HCC cells by flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean (SD), and the experimented were triplicated.∗P<0.05 and ∗∗P<0.01.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.3. The Effects of MZ on miR-217 in HCC Cells

miR-217 is closely bound up with tumor progression and adverse prognosis. We have confirmed MZ’s ability to inhibit HCC cell metastasis and induce apoptosis through experiments, but the specific mechanism is still unclear. In earlier studies, it was found that MZ can modulate miR expression to participate in tumor development. In this paper, the connection between MZ and miR-217 is analyzed. qRT-PCR identified a markedly declined miR-217 in HCC cells (Figure3(a), P<0.01), while distinctly elevated miR-217 after MZ intervention (Figure 3(b), P<0.01). Therefore, MZ can upregulate miR-217 in HCC cells.Figure 3
Midazolam enhances the expression of miR-217 in HCC cells. (a) The relative expression level of miR-217 in HCC cells by qRT-PCR. (b) Changes of miR-217 relative expression level in HCC cells after midazolam intervention by qRT-PCR. Data are presented as mean (SD), and the experimented were triplicated.∗P<0.05 and ∗∗P<0.01.
(a)(b)


### 3.4. miR-217 Downregulation Reverses MZ’s Impacts on HCC Cell Growth and Metastasis

It has been reported that miR-217 can suppress carcinogenesis and development of various cancer [25, 26]. In recent years, some studies have found that MZ can reduce miR transcription in tumors, thus inhibiting tumor progression. However, the impacts of MZ’s on HCC cell growth and metastasis have not yet been confirmed. At last, miR-217-inhibitor-transfected HCC cells (Figure 4(a), P<0.01) were cocultured with MZ to further observe HCC cell growth and metastasis alterations, so as to determine the connection between MZ and miR-217. And the invasiveness and migration of miR-217-inhibitor-transfected HCC cells were remarkably enhanced, while those of miR-217-inhibitor+MZ-transfected HCC cells exhibited no distinct difference, as compared to the blank group (Figure 4(b), P>0.05). Based on flow cytometry analysis, the apoptosis rate of miR-217-inhibitor-intervened HCC cells was distinctly lower while that of miR-217-inhibitor+MZ HCC cells showed no evident difference, as compared to the blank group (Figure 4(c), P>0.05). The above results demonstrate that MZ can suppress HCC cell metastasis and apoptosis via increasing miR-217.Figure 4
Effect of midazolam on the growth and metastasis of HCC cells via regulating miR-217. (a) qRT-PCR detection of the relative expression level of miR-217 in HCC cells transfected with miR-217-inhibitor. Data are presented as mean (SD), and the experimented were triplicated. (b) Effect of midazolam+miR-217-inhibitor on the invasion ability of HCC cells by Transwell assay. (c) Effect of midazolam+miR-217-inhibitor on the migration ability of HCC cells by Transwell assay. (d) Effect of midazolam+miR-217-inhibitor on apoptosis rate of HCC cells by flow cytometry. The Q4 represents the pi-stained cells which are apoptotic cells. Data are presented as mean (SD), and the experimented were triplicated.∗P<0.05 and ∗∗P<0.01.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.1. Impact of MZ on HCC Cell Viability

The effects of MZ on the growth of HCC cells were assessed. HepG2 cells were cocultured with different concentrations of Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 of HCC. It was found that HCC cell viability was more inhibited as MZ concentration increased (Figures1(a) and 1(c)). The mean of half inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 10 μg/mL was selected as the optimal concentration for the experimental intervention, to study the connection between MZ, miR-217, and HCC. IC50 results showed that Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 had a IC50 of 10.57 μg/mL and 9.35 μg/mL, respectively (Figures 1(b) and 1(d)), so we chose the concentration of 10 μg/mL for subsequent analysis through calculation. The results unraveled that MZ could evidently suppress the viability of HCC cells, and there existed significant difference among the control group and the groups in which the cells were treated with different concentrations of Hep3B and SK-HEP-1 of HCC.Figure 1
Effect of midazolam on HCC cell viability. (a) Effect of midazolam on Hep3B cytotoxicity. (b) Midazolam IC50 of Hep3B. (c) Effect of midazolam on SK-HEP-1 cytotoxicity. (d) Midazolam IC50 of SK-HEP-1. The mean of half inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 10μg/mL was selected as the optimal concentration for the experimental intervention, to study the connection between MZ, miR-217, and HCC. Data are presented as mean (SD), and the experimented were triplicated.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.2. Impact of MZ on HCC Cell Metastasis and Apoptosis

A previous study showed that MZ at low concentration can induce apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells, while inducing cell necrosis at high concentration [24]. However, the effect of MZ on HCC cell metastasis and apoptosis is not clear. Through toxicity test, we confirmed MZ’s ability to suppress HCC cell viability. Further, we observed MZ’s influence on HCC cell metastasis and apoptosis. We employed Transwell test and flow cytometer to analyze the alterations of HCC cell invasiveness, migration, and apoptosis following 10 μg/mL MZ intervention. The experimental results MZ revealed notably reduced invasiveness and migration (Figures 2(a)–2(c), P<0.01) and noticeably enhanced apoptosis (Figure 2(c), P<0.05) of HCC cells following MZ intervention compared with the blank group. This suggests that MZ has the ability to inhibit HCC cell metastasis and induce apoptosis.Figure 2
Effect of midazolam on metastasis and apoptosis of HCC cells. (a) Effect of midazolam on invasion ability of HCC cells by Transwell. (b) Effect of midazolam on migration ability of HCC cells by Transwell. (c) Effect of midazolam on apoptosis rate of HCC cells by flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean (SD), and the experimented were triplicated.∗P<0.05 and ∗∗P<0.01.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.3. The Effects of MZ on miR-217 in HCC Cells

miR-217 is closely bound up with tumor progression and adverse prognosis. We have confirmed MZ’s ability to inhibit HCC cell metastasis and induce apoptosis through experiments, but the specific mechanism is still unclear. In earlier studies, it was found that MZ can modulate miR expression to participate in tumor development. In this paper, the connection between MZ and miR-217 is analyzed. qRT-PCR identified a markedly declined miR-217 in HCC cells (Figure3(a), P<0.01), while distinctly elevated miR-217 after MZ intervention (Figure 3(b), P<0.01). Therefore, MZ can upregulate miR-217 in HCC cells.Figure 3
Midazolam enhances the expression of miR-217 in HCC cells. (a) The relative expression level of miR-217 in HCC cells by qRT-PCR. (b) Changes of miR-217 relative expression level in HCC cells after midazolam intervention by qRT-PCR. Data are presented as mean (SD), and the experimented were triplicated.∗P<0.05 and ∗∗P<0.01.
(a)(b)


## 3.4. miR-217 Downregulation Reverses MZ’s Impacts on HCC Cell Growth and Metastasis

It has been reported that miR-217 can suppress carcinogenesis and development of various cancer [25, 26]. In recent years, some studies have found that MZ can reduce miR transcription in tumors, thus inhibiting tumor progression. However, the impacts of MZ’s on HCC cell growth and metastasis have not yet been confirmed. At last, miR-217-inhibitor-transfected HCC cells (Figure 4(a), P<0.01) were cocultured with MZ to further observe HCC cell growth and metastasis alterations, so as to determine the connection between MZ and miR-217. And the invasiveness and migration of miR-217-inhibitor-transfected HCC cells were remarkably enhanced, while those of miR-217-inhibitor+MZ-transfected HCC cells exhibited no distinct difference, as compared to the blank group (Figure 4(b), P>0.05). Based on flow cytometry analysis, the apoptosis rate of miR-217-inhibitor-intervened HCC cells was distinctly lower while that of miR-217-inhibitor+MZ HCC cells showed no evident difference, as compared to the blank group (Figure 4(c), P>0.05). The above results demonstrate that MZ can suppress HCC cell metastasis and apoptosis via increasing miR-217.Figure 4
Effect of midazolam on the growth and metastasis of HCC cells via regulating miR-217. (a) qRT-PCR detection of the relative expression level of miR-217 in HCC cells transfected with miR-217-inhibitor. Data are presented as mean (SD), and the experimented were triplicated. (b) Effect of midazolam+miR-217-inhibitor on the invasion ability of HCC cells by Transwell assay. (c) Effect of midazolam+miR-217-inhibitor on the migration ability of HCC cells by Transwell assay. (d) Effect of midazolam+miR-217-inhibitor on apoptosis rate of HCC cells by flow cytometry. The Q4 represents the pi-stained cells which are apoptotic cells. Data are presented as mean (SD), and the experimented were triplicated.∗P<0.05 and ∗∗P<0.01.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 4. Discussion

HCC is the most frequent-occurring malignancies of the digestive tract, showing increasing incidence in recent years with rapid onset, serious deterioration, and low five-year survival rate [27–29]. Although comprehensive treatments such as surgical resection and chemotherapy have been applied to the clinic, the prognosis of patients is still unfavorable due to various factors [30]. Previous researches have shown that the adverse effects of malignancies were caused by the runaway mechanism of cell growth, multiplication, and apoptosis. For instance, when oncogenes are activated while antioncogenes are inhibited, it will cause the continuous spread of cancer cells and the increasingly serious diseases [31, 32].Recent studies have shown that narcotic drugs have an inhibitory action on tumor cell growth and metastasis. For example, dexmedetomidine accelerates breast cancer cell migration via Rab11-mediated secretion of exosomal TMPRSS2 [33] and regulates ovarian cancer cell multiplication, apoptosis, migration, and invasiveness through the miR-155/HIF-1α axis [34]. Besides, via regulating the lncRNA-MEG3/miR-421/BTG1 axis, lidocaine suppresses cervical cancer cell multiplication and enhances apoptosis [35].It has been unearthed that the abnormal expression of miRNAs was associated with the development as well as tumorigenesis in human cancers [36]. There was a recent research which proved the expression and prospective functional pathways of miRNA in HCC [37], in which the relationship between miRNA and HCC has been ascertained. MZ, a gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA A) receptor agonist and an anesthetic extensively used in benzodiazepines, has been recently found to exert inhibitory action against tumors [38]. MZ and other anesthetics show apoptosis-inducing activity and neuronal cytotoxicity in neuronal, hematopoietic, ectodermal, and mesenchymal cells [39]. It has been proved that MZ at low concentration can induce apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells, while inducing cell necrosis at high concentration [24]. However, it remains unclear whether MZ has the same effect of promoting apoptosis in other tumors. Here, we observed that HCC cell activity was notably suppressed with the increase of MZ concentration, and through calculation, we found that MZ inhibited HCC cell activity by 50% at 10 μg/mL. Therefore, the alterations of HCC cell metastasis and apoptosis under 10 μg/mL MZ was been observed. Through experiments, we determined that 10 μg/mL MZ can validly inhibit HCC cell metastasis and induce apoptosis, indicating that MZ also has tumor suppressive effects in HCC.miR is an endogenous small RNA molecule that can modulate the abundance and protein expression of mRNA. It can also have multiple or even hundreds of mRNA targets to bind and may be involved in various biological processes [40]. Besides, as a noninvasive biomarker of tumor, miR is of various clinical value such as diagnosis and prognosis prediction, playing a regulatory role in the occurrence, metastasis, progression, and other molecular mechanisms of HCC and possessing potential therapeutic efficacy [26, 41]. miR-217 is closely bound up with tumor progression and adverse prognosis. It has been reported that miR-217 could suppress carcinogenesis and development such as gastric [25] and liver carcinomas [42]. In recent years, some studies have found that MZ can reduce miR transcription in tumors, thus inhibiting tumor progression. However, whether MZ can modulate miR-217 has not been confirmed by relevant studies. In this study, we confirmed that MZ can upregulate miR-217 in HCC cells. Besides, the coculture of MZ and miR-217-inhibitor reversed miR-217-inhibitor’s impacts on HCC cell metastasis promotion and apoptosis inhibition, indicating that MZ restrains HCC cell metastasis and apoptosis by increasing miR-217. Qi et al. found that MZ could inhibit HCC cell proliferation and facilitate cell apoptosis [43], which is consistent with our findings. They also found that MZ inhibited the development of HCC cells by increasing miR-124-3p; while in our research, it was found that MZ had the ability to regulate miR-217 in addition to miR-124-3p, which suggests that MZ may participate in HCC cell growth by modulating multiple miRs. In line with this outcome, the positive impacts of miR-124-3p on apoptosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells have been reported in an existing research [7]. In addition, Zhang et al. also discovered that the overexpression of miR-124-3p had the ability to repress the apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in glioblastoma multiforme through regulating NRP-1 [7].What is more, MDZ could evidently suppress the growth of HCC cells. Similarly, the repressive impacts of MDZ on HCC cells have been affirmed in other studies [7]. More than that, the effects of MDZ on other liver-related diseases, such as hepatic malignancy and liver cirrhosis have been clarified [7].Based on the above studies, we basically confirmed that MZ could restrain HCC cell metastasis and apoptosis via increasing miR-217. However, there are some limits in our research. First, further verification is warranted to check whether miR-217 has the same effect in animal models sincein vivo experiments were absent in this study. Second, this study has not deeply explored whether miR-217 regulated HCC progression through downstream target genes or signaling pathways. Therefore, we hope to conduct more experiments in future research to improve our conclusions.Collectively, MZ can upregulate miR-217 in HCC cells, thus inhibiting HCC cell metastasis and inducing apoptosis.



---

*Source: 2813521-2022-03-09.xml*