# Theoretical Insight into Organic Dyes Incorporating Triphenylamine-Based Donors and Binaryπ-Conjugated Bridges for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Authors: Shuxian Wei; Xiaoqing Lu; Xiaofan Shi; Zhigang Deng; Yang Shao; Lianming Zhao; Wenyue Guo; Chi-Man Lawrence Wu
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

The design of light-absorbent sensitizers with sustainable and environment-friendly material is one of the key issues for the future development of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). In this work, a series of organic sensitizers incorporating alkoxy-substituted triphenylamine (tpa) donors and binaryπ-conjugated bridges were investigated using density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT). Molecular geometry, electronic structure, and optical absorption spectra are analyzed in the gas phase, chloroform, and dimethylformamide (DMF) solutions. Our results show that properly choosing the heteroaromatic atoms and/or adding one more alkoxy-substituted tpa group can finely adjust the molecular orbital energy. The solvent effect renders the HOMO-LUMO gaps of the tpa-based sensitizers decrease in the sequence of DMF solution < chloroform solution < gas phase. The absorption spectra are assigned to the ligand-to-ligand charge transfer (LLCT) characteristics via transitions mainly from tpa, 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (edot), and alkyl-substituted dithienosilole (dts) groups to edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups. The binary π-conjugated bridges play different roles in balancing the electron transfer and recombination for the different tpa-based sensitizers. The protonation/deprotonation effect has great effect on the HOMO-LUMO gaps and thus has great influence on the bands at the long wavelength region, but little influence on the bands at the short wavelength region.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are currently under active investigation for the solar energy utilization along with the growing worldwide demand for environmentally friendly energy sources [1–7]. The relative high performance, simple fabrication process, and low production costs render DSSCs as competitive alternative to conventional silicon devices. Usually, DSSCs are fabricated by sensitizers (dyes), photoanodes (mesoporous TiO2 films), counterelectrodes, and electrolytes/hole transporters. So far, polypyridyl Ru(II)-based complexes are proven to be the most efficient sensitizers employed in DSSCs [8–11], such as the tetraprotonated Ru(4,4′-dicarboxy-2,2′-bipyridine)2(NCS)2 complex (coded asN3) [8] and its doubly protonated analog (coded asN719) [10]. Although highly efficient, with a high efficiency over 12.1% [12], Ru-based prototypes are facing the problem of costly synthesis and undesired environmental issues. Metal-free organic sensitizers, which are in good agreement with the trend of the future developments of DSSCs using environmentally friendly and inexpensive materials, show several advantageous features relative to Ru-based complexes: (1) diversity of organic molecular structures can ensure more diversity of sensitizers for DSSCs; (2) high molar extinction coefficients of organic sensitizers can render the use of thinner semiconductor to promote charge separation; (3) more flexibility of organic sensitizers can be beneficial for constructing semitransparent and/or multicolor solar cells. At present, the highest photon-to-electron energy conversion efficiency has exceeded 13% for DSSCs using organic sensitizer [13].From a theoretical point of view, a few criteria should be fulfilled for the design of ideal organic sensitizers: (1) the molecular orientation should facilitate intramolecular charge transfer, and spatial separation should maintain the photooxidized donor at a distance from the photoinjected electrons, diminishing the impact of back electron transfer processes; (2) the energy level of LUMO should be sufficiently high for efficient electron injection into the TiO2, whereas the energy level of HOMO should be sufficiently low for efficient regeneration of the oxidized state; (3) the absorption band should extend from the whole visible region to near infrared range with strong absorption strength; (4) the stability should be good enough for about 108 turnover cycles of exposure to nature [14, 15]. Based on these requirements, the organic sensitizers are usually designed to be of electron donor-conjugated bridge-electron acceptor structure, called D-π-A architecture, with TiO2 surface anchoring groups integrated into the acceptor moiety. Arylamines and alkylamines, due to strong electron donating abilities as well as efficient intramolecular charge transfer characteristics, are usually used as electron donors in the D-π-A organic sensitizers [16–23]. Among them, DSSC using this metal-free organic sensitizer incorporating the lipophilic triphenylamine as electron donor and the hydrophilic cyanoacrylic acid as electron acceptor (coded asC219) has achieved an efficiency over 10% [24].However, a detailed atomistic characterization of this sensitizer is still not clear enough. Such an atomistic characterization can not only provide information that complements the experimental work, but also help to understand the structural and the electronic properties for design of novel sensitizers with improved performances [25–28]. In this work, we present a theoretical characterization ofC219 and its derivatives1–5. Molecular geometry, electronic structure, and spectral property of the sensitizers are investigated in the gas phase, chloroform, and dimethylformamide (DMF) solutions by means of the density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations.


## 2. Computational Methods

All calculations on the tpa-based sensitizers were performed with DFT and TD-DFT in the Gaussian 09 program package [29]. The B3LYP exchange correlation functional in conjunction with the 6-31G(d) basis set, which has already been proved to be an optimal compromise between accuracy and computational cost for such large aromatic molecules [30], was employed in the geometrical optimizations without any symmetry constraints for the sensitizers considered in both gas phase and solutions. The solvent effects were evaluated using the nonequilibrium [31] implementation of the conductor-like polarizable continuum model (C-PCM) [32–34]. This approach provides results very close to those obtained by the original dielectric model for high dielectric constant solvents but is significantly more effective in geometry optimizations and less prone to the numerical errors arising from the small part of the solute electron cloud lying outside the cavity [34]. TD-DFT calculations were used to investigate the optical properties of the sensitizers using the approximation of E
0
-
0 with the lowest vertical excitation energy of the system at the ground state geometry, which can be accurately and efficiently calculated by TD-DFT [35]. The 50 lowest spin-allowed singlet-singlet transitions, up to an energy of at least ~4.0 eV, were taken into account in the calculations of the adsorption spectra.


## 3. Results and Discussion

In the following sections, we start with the geometrical description ofC219 and its derivatives, followed by the discussion of electronic structures and molecular orbital energy levels and then the analysis of absorption spectra in the real environment of chloroform and DMF solutions, and finally the comparison of the relative light-harvesting efficiency (RLHE) of the tpa-based sensitizers.


### 3.1. Geometrical Considerations

The chemical structures ofC219 and its derivatives1–5 are shown in Figure 1.C219 is composed of three parts: (1) an alkoxy-substituted triphenylamine (tpa) as donor, (2) a cyanoacrylic acid as acceptor and anchoring group, and (3) a binary π-conjugated unit consisting of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (edot) and alkyl-substituted dithienosilole (dts) as bridge [24]. For computational convenience, the C6
H
13
+ and C8
H
17
+ groups of the experimentalC219 sensitizer are replaced by methyl groups marked with blue dash-lined ellipses and red dash-lined circles, as shown in Figure 1. Considering that the electron transfer mainly takes place via the high π-electron conjugated tpa center to acceptor and/or bridge centers, the end-on substitutions of the C6
H
13
+ and C8
H
17
+ groups by methyl groups have slight influence on the spectral properties of theC219 sensitizer.Figure 1
Schematic structures of the tpa-based sensitizers. The C6
H
13
+ and C8
H
17
+ groups in the tpa-based sensitizers are replaced by methyl groups marked with blue dash-lined ellipses and red dash-lined circles.In fact, these substitutions are checked in order not to result in appreciable changes in the electronic structures as well as the absorption spectra. The S atoms in the conjugated bridge of the prototype moleculeC219 are substituted by the same electron-rich heteroaromatic O and Se atoms in sensitizers1 and2. For sensitizers3,4, and5, one more alkoxy-substituted tpa group is added to substitute the ethylenedioxy group in1,C219, and2. This structural design is based on two considerations: (1) the heteroaromatic atoms may adjust the molecular orbital energies appropriately and (2) one more alkoxy-substituted tpa group may not only enhance the electron-donating ability, but also effectively inhibit I
3
- from approaching the surface of TiO2 by forming a denser layer at the surface. In addition, Na+ is used to substitute for H+ on cyanoacrylic acid groups in order to evaluate the protonation/deprotonation effect, that is, 1
′, C
219
′, 2
′, 3
′, 4
′
, and 5
′, as shown in Figure 1.According to the experimental setup ofC219, the solvents for calculations are chloroform (relative dielectric constant EPS = 4.71) and DMF (EPS = 37.22). The spectra recorded in different solvents are available, thus rendering it conceivable to investigate the solvent effects. For all the ground state geometries, our results show that different solvents have no noticeable impact because of the difference of the solvent polarity.


### 3.2. The Frontier Orbitals and Energy Levels

The electronic excitation occurs mainly from the highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMOs) to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMOs), and usually the HOMOs localize on the donor subunit and LUMOs on the acceptor subunit. The electronic structure analysis is thus essential to evaluate whether the molecular orbital contributions facilitate the efficient charge separation or not. Considering the similarity of their geometries,C219 and C
219
′ are chosen to exhibit the frontier molecular orbitals for1,C219,2 and 1
′, C
219
′, 2
′,4 and 4
′ are used to show the frontier molecular orbitals for3–5 and 3
′
–
5
′, respectively. Figure 2 shows the selected frontier molecular orbitals ofC219, C
219
′,4 and 4
′ calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level in chloroform solution. The first six frontier molecular orbital energies and the HOMO-LUMO gaps are depicted in Figure 3.Figure 2
The frontier molecular orbitals of sensitizersC219, C
219
′,4, and 4
′. Isodensity contour = 0.02.Energy levels and HOMO-LUMO gaps of the tpa-based sensitizers.
(a)
(b)It is clear, seen from Figure2, that the first three HOMOs (HOMO, HOMO-1, and HOMO-2) ofC219 are mainly composed of the π combinations of C and N on tpa, edot, and dts groups. Particularly, for the HOMO, considerable contribution is from the tpa ligand. This point is confirmed as one more tpa ligand is introduced in4, in which the first two HOMOs show almost entirely tpa-based characteristics. The bridge involved or not in the HOMOs would be of great difference for the electron transfer. If the binary bridge of edot and dts is involved in the HOMOs, it would facilitate the direct transfer of electron from the donor to the acceptor subunit, but it is also easy to occur recombinations for the transferred electrons. Otherwise, it would prevent electron recombination effectively but is not beneficial for the electron transfer. The key point for the binary bridge is that spatial separation should balance the photooxidized donor at a distance from the photoinjected electrons, diminishing the impact of back electron transfer processes [24, 36–39]. In this sense, the binary bridge of edot and dts inC219 plays a more positive role in promoting electron transfer but a more negative role in diminishing back electron transfer than that in4 [24]. That is, the binary π-conjugated bridges play different roles in balancing the electron transfer and recombination for the different tpa-based sensitizers.The first three LUMOs ofC219 are delocalized through the edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups, as shown in Figure 2. Sizeable contributions are from the cyanoacrylic acid group, which would facilitate the excited electrons injection into the semiconductors directly. The π
* orbitals from tpa ligand are almost not involved in the LUMOs. Considering that the LUMOs also include the spatial separation, it would be favorable for the electron recombination if the binary bridge of edot and dts is involved in the HOMOs. That is,4 and 4
′ are much better thanC219 and C
219
′ for diminishing the impact of back electron transfer. Seen from Figure 2, substitutions of Na+ for H+ (C219,4 → C
219
′, 4
′) on cyanoacrylic acid groups have more effects on the LUMOs than the HOMOs, as mirrored by the alterations of the Na+-associated cyanoacrylic acid orbital shapes. Substitutions of O and Se for S atom on the bridge alter the energy levels of the frontier molecular orbitals obviously. The energy levels of both HOMO and LUMO in the same framework are in the sequence of5 <4 <3 and2 <C219 <1 in the gas phase and solutions, as shown in Figure 3. This is due to the electron donating ability of the heteroatom involved, Se > S > O, which stabilizes the complexes by lowering their energy levels. Similar trend appears for the Na+-substituted analogs.As seen from Figure3, the HOMO-LUMO gaps of the tpa-based sensitizers decrease in the sequence of DMF solution < chloroform solution < gas phase. For instance, the HOMO-LUMO gaps ofC219 are 1.92, 1.97, and 2.09 eV obtained in DMF, chloroform, and the gas phase, respectively. This trend is due to the interactions of the sensitizers and the surroundings with different relative dielectric constant. As the relative dielectric constant increases, that is, gas phase (EPS = 0.00) < chloroform solution (EPS = 4.71) < DMF solution (EPS = 37.22), the interaction between the tpa-based sensitizers and the surroundings increases, and thus intramolecular interactions become weak and their energy levels increase [40, 41]. The tpa-based sensitizers are less insensitive to the change of solvent, as mirrored by a 0.05 eV shift when going from chloroform solution to DMF solution, while more sensitive to the change when going from the gas phase to the solutions. Besides, substitutions of Na+ for H+ on cyanoacrylic acid groups have great effect on the HOMO-LUMO gaps. As shown in Figure 3, the values increase by 0.28 and 0.31 eV when going fromC219 and4 to C
219
′ and 4
′, respectively. This is ascribed to the fact that these substitutions destabilize the LUMOs greater than the HOMOs and thus enlarge the HOMO-LUMO gaps, in good consistency with the alteration trend of the frontier molecular orbital distributions.


### 3.3. Electronic Excitations and Absorption Spectra

The absorption spectra of the tpa-based sensitizers are shown in Figure4, in which H+- and Na+-contained sensitizers are depicted in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. Overall, the band line shapes obtained in the gas phase and solutions agree well with each other, but the spectra obtained in solutions are shifted toward the long wavelength region with respect to those obtained in the gas phase [42, 43]. Comparison of the results gained in two solutions shows that the spectra in DMF solution are slightly red-shifted with respect to those in chloroform solution. This trend is in good agreement with the sequence of the HOMO-LUMO gaps obtained in two solutions. As for the protonation/deprotonation effect, substitutions of Na+ for H+ render the spectra toward the short wavelength region, as shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b). This trend agrees well with the enlarged HOMO-LUMO gaps of tpa-based sensitizers caused by these substitutions. In view of the real environment of DSSCs and the experimental setups, the results obtained in chloroform solution are used for the discussion of spectral properties as follows. Table 1 lists the selected excitation energies (E, nm), oscillator strength (f), and relative orbital contributions to the optical transitions between 350 and 800 nm of the absorption spectra in chloroform solution.Table 1
Selected excitation energies (E, nm), oscillator strength (f), and relative orbital contributions to the optical transitions between 350 and 800 nm of the absorption spectra of tpa-based sensitizers in chloroform solutiona.
E
f
Composition
E
f
Composition
C219
C219
′
713.1
1.281
H
-
0
→
L
+
0 (100%)
630.0
1.456
H
-
0
→
L
+
0 (99%)
530.4
0.616
H
-
1
→
L
+
0 (97%)
487.4
0.409
H
-
1
→
L
+
0 (97%)
438.5
0.281
H
-
0
→
L
+
1 (88%)
423.0
0.292
H
-
0
→
L
+
1 (91%)
387.3
0.023
H
-
3
→
L
+
0 (72%)
H
-
1
→
L
+
1 (14%)
354.5
0.085
H
-
0
→
L
+
2 (67%)
H
-
1
→
L
+
1 (24%)
363.3
0.212
H
-
0
→
L
+
2 (86%)
350.5
0.023
H
-
0
→
L
+
3 (90%)
356.4
0.152
H
-
1
→
L
+
1 (68%)
4
4
′
754.3
0.487
H
-
0
→
L
+
0 (100%)
635.1
0.699
H
-
0
→
L
+
0 (99%)
658.2
0.286
H
-
1
→
L
+
0 (99%)
559.7
0.314
H
-
1
→
L
+
0 (98%)
532.3
0.967
H
-
2
→
L
+
0 (98%)
490.5
0.713
H
-
2
→
L
+
0 (97%)
450.5
0.137
H
-
0
→
L
+
1 (94%)
429.5
0.201
H
-
0
→
L
+
1 (93%)
412.3
0.170
H
-
1
→
L
+
1 (79%)
H
-
3
→
L
+
0 (17%)
390.6
0.193
H
-
1
→
L
+
1 (88%)
382.5
0.078
H
-
4
→
L
+
0 (69%)
H
-
0
→
L
+
2 (25%)
366.4
0.267
H
-
0
→
L
+
2 (81%)
381.9
0.211
H
-
0
→
L
+
2 (62%)
H
-
4
→
L
+
0 (30%)
353.6
0.029
H
-
0
→
L
+
3 (88%)
355.6
0.109
H
-
2
→
L
+
1 (59%)
H
-
6
→
L
+
0 (24%)
350.9
0.076
H
-
2
→
L
+
1 (70%)
352.2
0.029
H
-
0
→
L
+
3 (88%)
349.1
0.201
H
-
1
→
L
+
2 (90%)
aOnly oscillator strength f
>
0.02 and orbital percentage > 10% are reported, where H = HOMO and L = LUMO.Simulated absorption spectra of H+- (a) and Na+- (b) contained tpa-based sensitizers.
(a)
(b)ForC219 in chloroform solution, four separated absorption bands are found to center at ~360, ~439, ~529, and ~714 nm. At ~360 nm, the band is composed of two peaks at 356.4 and 363.3 nm, originated from the starting orbitals of the HOMO/HOMO-1 combinations to the arriving orbitals of LUMO+1/LUMO+2 (see Table 1). Frontier orbital analysis shows that this band has the interligand and intraligand ligand-to-ligand charge transfer (LLCT) characteristics; that is, transitions occur from tpa, edot, and dts groups to edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups. Similarly, the bands at ~439, ~529, and ~714 nm also show interligand LLCT characteristics. It is quite different from the metal-centered complexes in previous investigations [25–28], in which spectra at the short wavelengths of the visible region show mainly the LLCT characteristic while those at the long wavelengths of the visible region show mixed characteristics of metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) and LLCT. ForC219, there is an increasing trend of oscillator strength (which is regarded as the measure of the intensity of the absorption peaks [37, 44]) along with the shift of the absorption band toward the long wavelength region; that is, the stronger oscillator strength appears in the band at the longer wavelength region. The lowest vertical excitation forC219 occurs at 713.1 nm with the oscillator strength of 1.281, originated from the 100% HOMO → LUMO transition. This transition occurs from tpa, edot, and dts groups to edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups, a mixed LLCT characteristic. Similar spectra and electronic excitation trends also appear for the O- and Se-substituted sensitizers1 and2, as shown in Figure 4(a).The spectra tend to shift toward the short wavelength region when substituting Na+ for H+, as shown in Figure 4(b). For C
219
′ in chloroform solution, four separated absorption bands are found to center at ~350, ~424, ~488, and ~630 nm. Compared with the corresponding bands ofC219, the substitution of Na+ for H+ has little effect on the bands at the short wavelength region (~360 and ~439 nm versus ~350 and ~424 nm) but has great effect on the bands at the long wavelength region (~529 and ~714 nm versus ~488 and ~630 nm). However, the increasing trend of oscillator strength in 1
′, C
219
′ and 2
′ is still the same as that inC219 along with the absorption band toward the long wavelength region. The lowest vertical excitation for C
219
′ occurs at 630.0 nm with the stronger oscillator strength of 1.456 than the corresponding value ofC219. In the energy range investigated, the band calculated at ~630 nm for C
219
′ is in good agreement with the experimental result of 584 nm, more consistent thanC219 at ~714 nm [24]. This means the spectra of the tpa-based organic sensitizers, as well as the energy levels and the HOMO-LUMO gaps, are sensitive to the protonation/deprotonation effect.The introduction of one more alkoxy-substituted tpa group alters the spectra significantly, as shown in Figure4. For4 in chloroform solution, the oscillator strength of bands becomes weaker at the long wavelength region of 600–800 nm, while stronger at middle wavelength region of 500–600 nm than the corresponding values ofC219. With respect to oscillator strength, it will be affected by the electron-donating capability from π-conjugation and heteroaromatic groups in sensitizers [27, 44, 45]. Similar trends occur for the O- and Se-substituted sensitizers3,5, and their Na+-substituted sensitizers 3
′, 4
′
, and 5
′. For4 at ~532 nm, the band results from the 98% HOMO-2 → LUMO transition with the oscillator strength of 0.967 (see Table 1). This transition shows the interligand and intraligand LLCT characteristic from tpa, edot, dts, and even cyanoacrylic acid groups to edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups. The lowest vertical excitation for4 occurs at 754.3 nm with the oscillator strength of 0.487, originated from the 100% HOMO → LUMO transition. Obviously, this transition has interligand LLCT characteristic; that is, transition occurs from double tpa groups to edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups.


### 3.4. Light-Harvesting Efficiency (LHE)

Light-harvesting efficiency (LHE), as a good indicator of the incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency (IPCE), characterizes the ability of dyes in harvesting light. The LHE can be approximately expressed as [46]
(1)
LHE
=
1
-
10
-
A
=
1
-
10
-
f
,
where A
(
f
) is the absorption (oscillator strength) of the dye associated with the λ
max
⁡, that is, the lowest vertical excitation energy (E
A). Table 2 lists the HOMO and LUMO energies, HOMO-LUMO gaps, lowest vertical excitation energies (E
A), oscillator strengths (
f
), and relative LHE (RLHE) of all sensitizers calculated in chloroform and DMF solutions. According to the structural and spectral properties, the relative LHE (RLHE) is evaluated by comparing sensitizers1,C219 and2 withC219, sensitizers3,4, and5 with4. The influence of solutions on LHE is negligible, due to the little difference in E
A and f for sensitizers in different solutions, as shown in Table 2. For1,C219 and2 in chloroform solution,2 owns the highest RLHE of 1.016, followed byC219 with 1.000 and1 of 0.980. This trend is in good agreement with the sequence of electron donating ability of heteroatoms involved, Se > S > O. For3,4, and5 in chloroform solution,3 shows the highest RLHE of 1.123, followed by5 of 1.040 and4 of 1.000. This indicates that the adjustment on the LHE via the heteroatoms would not be of much help after greatly enhancing the electron-donating group, such as another tpa donor involved.Table 2
The HOMO and LUMO energies, HOMO-LUMO gaps, lowest vertical excitation energies (E
A), oscillator strengths (f), and relative LHE (RLHE) for all sensitizersa.
Solutions
Sensitizers
LUMO
HOMO
HOMO-LUMO
E
A
f
RLHE
Chloroform
1
−2.51
−4.56
2.05
1.82
1.150
0.980
C219
−2.70
−4.67
1.97
1.74
1.281
1.000
2
−2.73
−4.65
1.92
1.70
1.435
1.016
3
−2.56
−4.56
2.00
1.76
0.614
1.123
4
−2.76
−4.65
1.89
1.65
0.487
1.000
5
−2.81
−4.64
1.84
1.60
0.524
1.040
DMF
1
−2.59
−4.60
2.01
1.79
1.153
0.982
C219
−2.76
−4.69
1.92
1.71
1.273
1.000
2
−2.79
−4.67
1.88
1.67
1.431
1.017
3
−2.64
−4.61
1.98
1.74
0.630
1.120
4
−2.82
−4.69
1.87
1.63
0.500
1.000
5
−2.86
−4.68
1.82
1.58
0.537
1.038
aAll energies are in eV.


## 3.1. Geometrical Considerations

The chemical structures ofC219 and its derivatives1–5 are shown in Figure 1.C219 is composed of three parts: (1) an alkoxy-substituted triphenylamine (tpa) as donor, (2) a cyanoacrylic acid as acceptor and anchoring group, and (3) a binary π-conjugated unit consisting of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (edot) and alkyl-substituted dithienosilole (dts) as bridge [24]. For computational convenience, the C6
H
13
+ and C8
H
17
+ groups of the experimentalC219 sensitizer are replaced by methyl groups marked with blue dash-lined ellipses and red dash-lined circles, as shown in Figure 1. Considering that the electron transfer mainly takes place via the high π-electron conjugated tpa center to acceptor and/or bridge centers, the end-on substitutions of the C6
H
13
+ and C8
H
17
+ groups by methyl groups have slight influence on the spectral properties of theC219 sensitizer.Figure 1
Schematic structures of the tpa-based sensitizers. The C6
H
13
+ and C8
H
17
+ groups in the tpa-based sensitizers are replaced by methyl groups marked with blue dash-lined ellipses and red dash-lined circles.In fact, these substitutions are checked in order not to result in appreciable changes in the electronic structures as well as the absorption spectra. The S atoms in the conjugated bridge of the prototype moleculeC219 are substituted by the same electron-rich heteroaromatic O and Se atoms in sensitizers1 and2. For sensitizers3,4, and5, one more alkoxy-substituted tpa group is added to substitute the ethylenedioxy group in1,C219, and2. This structural design is based on two considerations: (1) the heteroaromatic atoms may adjust the molecular orbital energies appropriately and (2) one more alkoxy-substituted tpa group may not only enhance the electron-donating ability, but also effectively inhibit I
3
- from approaching the surface of TiO2 by forming a denser layer at the surface. In addition, Na+ is used to substitute for H+ on cyanoacrylic acid groups in order to evaluate the protonation/deprotonation effect, that is, 1
′, C
219
′, 2
′, 3
′, 4
′
, and 5
′, as shown in Figure 1.According to the experimental setup ofC219, the solvents for calculations are chloroform (relative dielectric constant EPS = 4.71) and DMF (EPS = 37.22). The spectra recorded in different solvents are available, thus rendering it conceivable to investigate the solvent effects. For all the ground state geometries, our results show that different solvents have no noticeable impact because of the difference of the solvent polarity.


## 3.2. The Frontier Orbitals and Energy Levels

The electronic excitation occurs mainly from the highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMOs) to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMOs), and usually the HOMOs localize on the donor subunit and LUMOs on the acceptor subunit. The electronic structure analysis is thus essential to evaluate whether the molecular orbital contributions facilitate the efficient charge separation or not. Considering the similarity of their geometries,C219 and C
219
′ are chosen to exhibit the frontier molecular orbitals for1,C219,2 and 1
′, C
219
′, 2
′,4 and 4
′ are used to show the frontier molecular orbitals for3–5 and 3
′
–
5
′, respectively. Figure 2 shows the selected frontier molecular orbitals ofC219, C
219
′,4 and 4
′ calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level in chloroform solution. The first six frontier molecular orbital energies and the HOMO-LUMO gaps are depicted in Figure 3.Figure 2
The frontier molecular orbitals of sensitizersC219, C
219
′,4, and 4
′. Isodensity contour = 0.02.Energy levels and HOMO-LUMO gaps of the tpa-based sensitizers.
(a)
(b)It is clear, seen from Figure2, that the first three HOMOs (HOMO, HOMO-1, and HOMO-2) ofC219 are mainly composed of the π combinations of C and N on tpa, edot, and dts groups. Particularly, for the HOMO, considerable contribution is from the tpa ligand. This point is confirmed as one more tpa ligand is introduced in4, in which the first two HOMOs show almost entirely tpa-based characteristics. The bridge involved or not in the HOMOs would be of great difference for the electron transfer. If the binary bridge of edot and dts is involved in the HOMOs, it would facilitate the direct transfer of electron from the donor to the acceptor subunit, but it is also easy to occur recombinations for the transferred electrons. Otherwise, it would prevent electron recombination effectively but is not beneficial for the electron transfer. The key point for the binary bridge is that spatial separation should balance the photooxidized donor at a distance from the photoinjected electrons, diminishing the impact of back electron transfer processes [24, 36–39]. In this sense, the binary bridge of edot and dts inC219 plays a more positive role in promoting electron transfer but a more negative role in diminishing back electron transfer than that in4 [24]. That is, the binary π-conjugated bridges play different roles in balancing the electron transfer and recombination for the different tpa-based sensitizers.The first three LUMOs ofC219 are delocalized through the edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups, as shown in Figure 2. Sizeable contributions are from the cyanoacrylic acid group, which would facilitate the excited electrons injection into the semiconductors directly. The π
* orbitals from tpa ligand are almost not involved in the LUMOs. Considering that the LUMOs also include the spatial separation, it would be favorable for the electron recombination if the binary bridge of edot and dts is involved in the HOMOs. That is,4 and 4
′ are much better thanC219 and C
219
′ for diminishing the impact of back electron transfer. Seen from Figure 2, substitutions of Na+ for H+ (C219,4 → C
219
′, 4
′) on cyanoacrylic acid groups have more effects on the LUMOs than the HOMOs, as mirrored by the alterations of the Na+-associated cyanoacrylic acid orbital shapes. Substitutions of O and Se for S atom on the bridge alter the energy levels of the frontier molecular orbitals obviously. The energy levels of both HOMO and LUMO in the same framework are in the sequence of5 <4 <3 and2 <C219 <1 in the gas phase and solutions, as shown in Figure 3. This is due to the electron donating ability of the heteroatom involved, Se > S > O, which stabilizes the complexes by lowering their energy levels. Similar trend appears for the Na+-substituted analogs.As seen from Figure3, the HOMO-LUMO gaps of the tpa-based sensitizers decrease in the sequence of DMF solution < chloroform solution < gas phase. For instance, the HOMO-LUMO gaps ofC219 are 1.92, 1.97, and 2.09 eV obtained in DMF, chloroform, and the gas phase, respectively. This trend is due to the interactions of the sensitizers and the surroundings with different relative dielectric constant. As the relative dielectric constant increases, that is, gas phase (EPS = 0.00) < chloroform solution (EPS = 4.71) < DMF solution (EPS = 37.22), the interaction between the tpa-based sensitizers and the surroundings increases, and thus intramolecular interactions become weak and their energy levels increase [40, 41]. The tpa-based sensitizers are less insensitive to the change of solvent, as mirrored by a 0.05 eV shift when going from chloroform solution to DMF solution, while more sensitive to the change when going from the gas phase to the solutions. Besides, substitutions of Na+ for H+ on cyanoacrylic acid groups have great effect on the HOMO-LUMO gaps. As shown in Figure 3, the values increase by 0.28 and 0.31 eV when going fromC219 and4 to C
219
′ and 4
′, respectively. This is ascribed to the fact that these substitutions destabilize the LUMOs greater than the HOMOs and thus enlarge the HOMO-LUMO gaps, in good consistency with the alteration trend of the frontier molecular orbital distributions.


## 3.3. Electronic Excitations and Absorption Spectra

The absorption spectra of the tpa-based sensitizers are shown in Figure4, in which H+- and Na+-contained sensitizers are depicted in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. Overall, the band line shapes obtained in the gas phase and solutions agree well with each other, but the spectra obtained in solutions are shifted toward the long wavelength region with respect to those obtained in the gas phase [42, 43]. Comparison of the results gained in two solutions shows that the spectra in DMF solution are slightly red-shifted with respect to those in chloroform solution. This trend is in good agreement with the sequence of the HOMO-LUMO gaps obtained in two solutions. As for the protonation/deprotonation effect, substitutions of Na+ for H+ render the spectra toward the short wavelength region, as shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b). This trend agrees well with the enlarged HOMO-LUMO gaps of tpa-based sensitizers caused by these substitutions. In view of the real environment of DSSCs and the experimental setups, the results obtained in chloroform solution are used for the discussion of spectral properties as follows. Table 1 lists the selected excitation energies (E, nm), oscillator strength (f), and relative orbital contributions to the optical transitions between 350 and 800 nm of the absorption spectra in chloroform solution.Table 1
Selected excitation energies (E, nm), oscillator strength (f), and relative orbital contributions to the optical transitions between 350 and 800 nm of the absorption spectra of tpa-based sensitizers in chloroform solutiona.
E
f
Composition
E
f
Composition
C219
C219
′
713.1
1.281
H
-
0
→
L
+
0 (100%)
630.0
1.456
H
-
0
→
L
+
0 (99%)
530.4
0.616
H
-
1
→
L
+
0 (97%)
487.4
0.409
H
-
1
→
L
+
0 (97%)
438.5
0.281
H
-
0
→
L
+
1 (88%)
423.0
0.292
H
-
0
→
L
+
1 (91%)
387.3
0.023
H
-
3
→
L
+
0 (72%)
H
-
1
→
L
+
1 (14%)
354.5
0.085
H
-
0
→
L
+
2 (67%)
H
-
1
→
L
+
1 (24%)
363.3
0.212
H
-
0
→
L
+
2 (86%)
350.5
0.023
H
-
0
→
L
+
3 (90%)
356.4
0.152
H
-
1
→
L
+
1 (68%)
4
4
′
754.3
0.487
H
-
0
→
L
+
0 (100%)
635.1
0.699
H
-
0
→
L
+
0 (99%)
658.2
0.286
H
-
1
→
L
+
0 (99%)
559.7
0.314
H
-
1
→
L
+
0 (98%)
532.3
0.967
H
-
2
→
L
+
0 (98%)
490.5
0.713
H
-
2
→
L
+
0 (97%)
450.5
0.137
H
-
0
→
L
+
1 (94%)
429.5
0.201
H
-
0
→
L
+
1 (93%)
412.3
0.170
H
-
1
→
L
+
1 (79%)
H
-
3
→
L
+
0 (17%)
390.6
0.193
H
-
1
→
L
+
1 (88%)
382.5
0.078
H
-
4
→
L
+
0 (69%)
H
-
0
→
L
+
2 (25%)
366.4
0.267
H
-
0
→
L
+
2 (81%)
381.9
0.211
H
-
0
→
L
+
2 (62%)
H
-
4
→
L
+
0 (30%)
353.6
0.029
H
-
0
→
L
+
3 (88%)
355.6
0.109
H
-
2
→
L
+
1 (59%)
H
-
6
→
L
+
0 (24%)
350.9
0.076
H
-
2
→
L
+
1 (70%)
352.2
0.029
H
-
0
→
L
+
3 (88%)
349.1
0.201
H
-
1
→
L
+
2 (90%)
aOnly oscillator strength f
>
0.02 and orbital percentage > 10% are reported, where H = HOMO and L = LUMO.Simulated absorption spectra of H+- (a) and Na+- (b) contained tpa-based sensitizers.
(a)
(b)ForC219 in chloroform solution, four separated absorption bands are found to center at ~360, ~439, ~529, and ~714 nm. At ~360 nm, the band is composed of two peaks at 356.4 and 363.3 nm, originated from the starting orbitals of the HOMO/HOMO-1 combinations to the arriving orbitals of LUMO+1/LUMO+2 (see Table 1). Frontier orbital analysis shows that this band has the interligand and intraligand ligand-to-ligand charge transfer (LLCT) characteristics; that is, transitions occur from tpa, edot, and dts groups to edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups. Similarly, the bands at ~439, ~529, and ~714 nm also show interligand LLCT characteristics. It is quite different from the metal-centered complexes in previous investigations [25–28], in which spectra at the short wavelengths of the visible region show mainly the LLCT characteristic while those at the long wavelengths of the visible region show mixed characteristics of metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) and LLCT. ForC219, there is an increasing trend of oscillator strength (which is regarded as the measure of the intensity of the absorption peaks [37, 44]) along with the shift of the absorption band toward the long wavelength region; that is, the stronger oscillator strength appears in the band at the longer wavelength region. The lowest vertical excitation forC219 occurs at 713.1 nm with the oscillator strength of 1.281, originated from the 100% HOMO → LUMO transition. This transition occurs from tpa, edot, and dts groups to edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups, a mixed LLCT characteristic. Similar spectra and electronic excitation trends also appear for the O- and Se-substituted sensitizers1 and2, as shown in Figure 4(a).The spectra tend to shift toward the short wavelength region when substituting Na+ for H+, as shown in Figure 4(b). For C
219
′ in chloroform solution, four separated absorption bands are found to center at ~350, ~424, ~488, and ~630 nm. Compared with the corresponding bands ofC219, the substitution of Na+ for H+ has little effect on the bands at the short wavelength region (~360 and ~439 nm versus ~350 and ~424 nm) but has great effect on the bands at the long wavelength region (~529 and ~714 nm versus ~488 and ~630 nm). However, the increasing trend of oscillator strength in 1
′, C
219
′ and 2
′ is still the same as that inC219 along with the absorption band toward the long wavelength region. The lowest vertical excitation for C
219
′ occurs at 630.0 nm with the stronger oscillator strength of 1.456 than the corresponding value ofC219. In the energy range investigated, the band calculated at ~630 nm for C
219
′ is in good agreement with the experimental result of 584 nm, more consistent thanC219 at ~714 nm [24]. This means the spectra of the tpa-based organic sensitizers, as well as the energy levels and the HOMO-LUMO gaps, are sensitive to the protonation/deprotonation effect.The introduction of one more alkoxy-substituted tpa group alters the spectra significantly, as shown in Figure4. For4 in chloroform solution, the oscillator strength of bands becomes weaker at the long wavelength region of 600–800 nm, while stronger at middle wavelength region of 500–600 nm than the corresponding values ofC219. With respect to oscillator strength, it will be affected by the electron-donating capability from π-conjugation and heteroaromatic groups in sensitizers [27, 44, 45]. Similar trends occur for the O- and Se-substituted sensitizers3,5, and their Na+-substituted sensitizers 3
′, 4
′
, and 5
′. For4 at ~532 nm, the band results from the 98% HOMO-2 → LUMO transition with the oscillator strength of 0.967 (see Table 1). This transition shows the interligand and intraligand LLCT characteristic from tpa, edot, dts, and even cyanoacrylic acid groups to edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups. The lowest vertical excitation for4 occurs at 754.3 nm with the oscillator strength of 0.487, originated from the 100% HOMO → LUMO transition. Obviously, this transition has interligand LLCT characteristic; that is, transition occurs from double tpa groups to edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups.


## 3.4. Light-Harvesting Efficiency (LHE)

Light-harvesting efficiency (LHE), as a good indicator of the incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency (IPCE), characterizes the ability of dyes in harvesting light. The LHE can be approximately expressed as [46]
(1)
LHE
=
1
-
10
-
A
=
1
-
10
-
f
,
where A
(
f
) is the absorption (oscillator strength) of the dye associated with the λ
max
⁡, that is, the lowest vertical excitation energy (E
A). Table 2 lists the HOMO and LUMO energies, HOMO-LUMO gaps, lowest vertical excitation energies (E
A), oscillator strengths (
f
), and relative LHE (RLHE) of all sensitizers calculated in chloroform and DMF solutions. According to the structural and spectral properties, the relative LHE (RLHE) is evaluated by comparing sensitizers1,C219 and2 withC219, sensitizers3,4, and5 with4. The influence of solutions on LHE is negligible, due to the little difference in E
A and f for sensitizers in different solutions, as shown in Table 2. For1,C219 and2 in chloroform solution,2 owns the highest RLHE of 1.016, followed byC219 with 1.000 and1 of 0.980. This trend is in good agreement with the sequence of electron donating ability of heteroatoms involved, Se > S > O. For3,4, and5 in chloroform solution,3 shows the highest RLHE of 1.123, followed by5 of 1.040 and4 of 1.000. This indicates that the adjustment on the LHE via the heteroatoms would not be of much help after greatly enhancing the electron-donating group, such as another tpa donor involved.Table 2
The HOMO and LUMO energies, HOMO-LUMO gaps, lowest vertical excitation energies (E
A), oscillator strengths (f), and relative LHE (RLHE) for all sensitizersa.
Solutions
Sensitizers
LUMO
HOMO
HOMO-LUMO
E
A
f
RLHE
Chloroform
1
−2.51
−4.56
2.05
1.82
1.150
0.980
C219
−2.70
−4.67
1.97
1.74
1.281
1.000
2
−2.73
−4.65
1.92
1.70
1.435
1.016
3
−2.56
−4.56
2.00
1.76
0.614
1.123
4
−2.76
−4.65
1.89
1.65
0.487
1.000
5
−2.81
−4.64
1.84
1.60
0.524
1.040
DMF
1
−2.59
−4.60
2.01
1.79
1.153
0.982
C219
−2.76
−4.69
1.92
1.71
1.273
1.000
2
−2.79
−4.67
1.88
1.67
1.431
1.017
3
−2.64
−4.61
1.98
1.74
0.630
1.120
4
−2.82
−4.69
1.87
1.63
0.500
1.000
5
−2.86
−4.68
1.82
1.58
0.537
1.038
aAll energies are in eV.


## 4. Conclusions

In this work, we have presented a theoretical investigation on organic sensitizers incorporating alkoxy-substituted triphenylamine donors and binaryπ-conjugated bridges based on DFT/TD-DFT calculations in the gas phase, chloroform, and DMF solutions. Our results show that properly choosing the heteroaromatic atoms and adding one more alkoxy-substituted tpa group can finely adjust the molecular orbital energies. Frontier orbital analysis shows that the three highest HOMOs are mainly composed of the π combinations on tpa, edot, and dts groups forC219-like sensitizers but only tpa group for4-like analogs. The three LUMOs are delocalized through the edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups for all tpa-based sensitizers. The HOMO-LUMO gaps of the tpa-based sensitizers decrease in the sequence of DMF solution < chloroform solution < gas phase, according well to the increase of relative dielectric constant of gas phase < chloroform solution < DMF solution. The spectra are assigned to the LLCT characteristics which are originated mainly from transitions of tpa, edot, and dts groups to edot, dts, and cyanoacrylic acid groups. The binary π-conjugated bridge plays a dual role in balancing the electron transfer and recombination forC219-like sensitizers but an active role in diminishing the impact of back electron transfer for4-like analogs. The protonation/deprotonation effect enlarges the HOMO-LUMO gaps and thus has great influence on the bands at the long wavelength region, but little influence on the bands at the short wavelength region.



---

*Source: 280196-2014-06-11.xml*