# Determination of Optimum Conditions for the Production of Activated Carbon Derived from Separate Varieties of Coconut Shells

Authors: E. S. Sanni; M. E. Emetere; J. O. Odigure; V. E. Efeovbokhan; O. Agboola; E. R. Sadiku
Journal: International Journal of Chemical Engineering
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Activated carbons were produced from coconut shells of tall and dwarf tree varieties. The activated carbon from the tall tree variety was initially synthesized using 1 M concentration of each of ZnCl2, H3PO4, and KOH solutions. From the adsorptive tests conducted using methylene blue solution, the activated carbon produced with H3PO4 gave the best absorbance and adsorptive performance. Coconut shells of dwarf tree variety were then obtained and treated with same mass of coconut shells of the tall tree variety using varied concentrations of the acid in order to determine whether the optimum concentration and temperature for producing carbon black from the coconut shells are distinct or similar for both varieties. The process was also modelled using the Differential Response Method (DRM) in order to determine the yields and adsorptive performances of the activated carbons by varying the carbonization temperature and concentration. The results from experiment and the developed mathematical model were both found to be in agreement giving the optimum concentration of phosphoric acid and pH for producing activated carbon to be 0.67 M and 2.07 for the tall tree variety and 1 M and 1.98 for the dwarf variety at optimum temperatures in the range of 450–575°C and 575°C, respectively.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Activated carbon, a carbonaceous material with characteristic surface area and highly developed porous structure, consists of 87 to 97% carbon with other trace elements [1]. It can be produced from coal, wood, agricultural, and paper wastes for the adsorption of methylene blue [2]. Applications of activated carbon include air and water purification, water filtration, ground water remediation, adsorption of poisons, and drug overdoses. These and several other reasons are behind its increased market demand. According to [3], its preparation involves carbonization of the precursor below 800°C in an inert atmosphere before carbonization. In this research, coconut shells were used because they are cheap and readily available in Nigeria. The shells contain volatile matter and moisture that are removed by the application of heat [4]. Gratuito et al. [5] carried out process optimization of activated carbon yield produced from coconut shells using RSM. Different methods are available for producing activated carbon but for specific industrial application, a solid adsorbent with wide pore size distribution can be preferably obtained via chemical activation [6]. Activated carbons obtained from snail shells and apple peels were discussed [6, 7]. Hung [8] used a fluidized bed reactor to convert crushed coconut shells to activated carbon, syngas, bio-oils, and water while, in [9], bamboo was used to prepare activated carbon of high surface area. The various methods for preparing activated carbon from carbon precursors are contained in [10]. Karacan et al. [11] optimized the manufacturing conditions for producing activated carbon from lignite. Ketcha et al. [12] prepared activated carbon from maize cobs using zinc chloride as activating agent. The reduction of hexamine III cobalt was carried out using activated carbon produced from coconut shells as catalyst [13], while the work of Mourao et al. [14] considered the influence of oxidation on the adsorptive capacity of activated carbon synthesized from lignocellulosic precursors. The preparation and characterization of activated carbons from cellulosic waste materials for waste water treatment were carried out [15–17]. Before carbonization, the raw materials are impregnated with chemicals such as acid, strong base, or salt [18]. Production and characterization of activated carbons from coconut shells were discussed [19]; their adsorption capacities were determined by contacting them separately with methyl red and potassium permanganate. Shalna and Yogamoortthi [20] produced activated carbon with high chromium removal efficiency from tea dust using H3PO4 as the activating agent. Sodeinde [21] used activated carbon produced from coconut shells impregnated with ZnCl2 to obtain cobalt II from cobalt III, and the results were similar to those of Long et al. [13]. Bagasse, apricot stones, hazelnut, almond, pistachio, and walnut hard shells when used as precursors for producing activated carbon show that activation temperature/time and chemical-to-carbon impregnation ratio are important parameters for determining the quality of activated carbon [22]. Coconut fibre was used for synthesizing activated carbon using H3PO4 as activating agent [23]. Several works on synthesis of activated carbon via chemical activation involve the use of popular chemicals such as H3PO4, ZnCl2 and KOH as activating agents; however, H3PO4 is preferred to ZnCl2 because of the adverse effect ZnCl2 has on the environment, hence the reason for its limitation in use in the food and pharmaceutical industries [24]. The use of other raw materials such as rubber, wood dust [24], and sugar cane bagasse pith [25] has also been exploited as raw materials for producing activating carbon. Tan et al. [26] also conducted an optimization study on activated carbon produced from coconut husk which was found suitable for the removal of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol using KOH treatment and CO2 gasification. This paper focuses on determining the optimum temperature and concentration for the synthesis of activated carbon with excellent adsorptive performance using DRM since previous works had their intents on obtaining the best activating agent, carbon yield, carbon-to-chemical impregnation ratio, and so forth. The mathematical approach widely used is RSM. Till date, no research work states the optimum temperature and concentration(s) of H3PO4 required for producing one or more varieties of coconut shell activated carbon; again, this brings to mind the need to find out if the optimum conditions for producing activated carbon with excellent adsorptive performance is the same for separate varieties of coconut shells.


## 2. Equipment, Materials, and Reagents

### 2.1. Raw Materials, Chemicals, and Reagents

The materials and reagents used include coconut shells from tall and dwarf trees, distilled water, 0.3 M, 0.5 M, 0.67 M, and 1.33 M concentrated phosphoric acid of 99% purity manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich, 95% pure zinc chloride pellets made by MRS Scientific Ltd., 1 M KOH of 85% purity, made by Sigma-Aldrich and methylene blue dye, buffer solutions4.01±0.02 (colour-coded pink, HACH 22835-48, 1 L) and 7.01±0.02 (colour-coded yellow, HACH 22835-49, 0.5 L) for pH meter calibration made by HM Digital Inc., USA, measuring cylinder, flat bottom flasks, conical flask, and beakers manufactured by J Sill Borosilicates, and filter paper by Whatman No. 2V and of 18 cm diameter.


### 2.2. Instrumentation and Equipment

Automated sieve shaker by Matest-Treviolo (for sieving particles of coconut shells), Italy, UV mass spectrophotometer: 7310 visible Scanning Spectrophotometer fitted with 10 × 10 mm cuvette holder, 320–1000 nm wavelength, resolution = 1 nm accuracy of ±2 nm, manufactured by Jenway (used to measure the transmittance and absorbance of filtrate/unabsorbed dye solution), muffle furnace with maximum temp. of 1300°C and 5–23 L chamber volume, made by Carbolite Gero (for heating the samples/carbonization), Oven Vs-1202d3 made by Vision Scientific Co. Ltd. (for drying the samples), electronic weighing balance manufactured by Swastic Systems and Services, India (used to measure the weights of samples), pH meter (used to determine the pH of the activating agents and activated carbons), Orion™ Dual Star™ pH, ISE Mv, ORP with temperature dual channel bench top meter manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Joel Field Emission Electron Microscope JESM-7600F were used to obtain the elemental compositions of the activated carbons and visualize the surfaces of the samples.


### 2.3. Mathematical Determination of Optimization Boundaries

The Differential Response Technique was used to establish the experimental conditions and parameters of interest include carbonization temperatureX1 and concentration of reagent X2 towards obtaining activated carbon of high adsorption capacity and economic viability. Central composite design was used to determine the minimum number of experiments required. We then calculatedN using(1)N=2n+2n+nc=21+21+0=4,where N is the total number of experiments required, nc is center runs (nc = 0), and n is the number of factors (n=1). Hence, for minimum experimental runs, N is given as 4.We modified the factorial design propounded by Karacan et al. [11]: (2)Y=b0+b1X1+b2X2+b3X3+b4X1X2+b5X1X3+b6X2X3+b7X1X2X3,where Y is the yield, b0 is the global mean, and bi represents the other regression coefficients, where i=1,2,3,…,j.The model formulation depends on carbon yield because it is common to all variables. The number of terms equals the number of experiments; hence(3)Y=b0+b1X1X2+b2X1X22.For every difference in yield (Y+ΔY), it is as a result of an increase in the input variables (X1+ΔX1) and (X2+ΔX2), therefore, (4a)Y+ΔY=b0+b1X1+ΔX1X2+ΔX2+b2X1+ΔX1X2+ΔX22.Subtract (3) from (4a)(4b)ΔY=b1X2ΔX1+b1X1ΔX2+b1ΔX1ΔX2+2b2X12X2ΔX2+b2X12ΔX22+2b2X1X22ΔX1+4b2X1X2ΔX1ΔX2+2b2X1ΔX1ΔX22+b2X22ΔX12+2b2X2ΔX12ΔX2+b2ΔX12ΔX22.Divide through by ΔX1 and set ΔX1→0. The above equation then gives(5)dYdX1=b1X2+ΔX2+b22X1X22+4X1X2ΔX2+2X1ΔX22,(6)d2YdX12=b22X22+4X2ΔX2+2ΔX22=2b2X2+ΔX22.We take the second differential equation by dividing (4a) through by ΔX2 and set ΔX2→0. (7)dYdX2=b1X1+ΔX1+b22X2X12+4X1X2ΔX1+2X2ΔX12,d2YdX22=b22X12+4X1ΔX1+2ΔX12=2b2X1+ΔX12.From (5), (8)d2YdX1X2=b1+b24X1X2+4X1+2X1ΔX2.From (6),(9)d2YdX2X1=b1+b24X1X2+4X2+2X2ΔX1.The coefficients in (5)–(9) above act as normalizing agents. The optimum condition for minimum experimental runs is very difficult to draw conclusions from; however, the DRT has the ability to monitor minute changes. The solution of (9) was chosen because of the role of concentration of chemical reagent for minimum experimental runs. However, we recommend the solutions of (5)–(8) for higher experimental runs. For economic reasons, few experimental runs were considered as they help to understudy the weaknesses and strengths of the approach adopted.


## 2.1. Raw Materials, Chemicals, and Reagents

The materials and reagents used include coconut shells from tall and dwarf trees, distilled water, 0.3 M, 0.5 M, 0.67 M, and 1.33 M concentrated phosphoric acid of 99% purity manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich, 95% pure zinc chloride pellets made by MRS Scientific Ltd., 1 M KOH of 85% purity, made by Sigma-Aldrich and methylene blue dye, buffer solutions4.01±0.02 (colour-coded pink, HACH 22835-48, 1 L) and 7.01±0.02 (colour-coded yellow, HACH 22835-49, 0.5 L) for pH meter calibration made by HM Digital Inc., USA, measuring cylinder, flat bottom flasks, conical flask, and beakers manufactured by J Sill Borosilicates, and filter paper by Whatman No. 2V and of 18 cm diameter.


## 2.2. Instrumentation and Equipment

Automated sieve shaker by Matest-Treviolo (for sieving particles of coconut shells), Italy, UV mass spectrophotometer: 7310 visible Scanning Spectrophotometer fitted with 10 × 10 mm cuvette holder, 320–1000 nm wavelength, resolution = 1 nm accuracy of ±2 nm, manufactured by Jenway (used to measure the transmittance and absorbance of filtrate/unabsorbed dye solution), muffle furnace with maximum temp. of 1300°C and 5–23 L chamber volume, made by Carbolite Gero (for heating the samples/carbonization), Oven Vs-1202d3 made by Vision Scientific Co. Ltd. (for drying the samples), electronic weighing balance manufactured by Swastic Systems and Services, India (used to measure the weights of samples), pH meter (used to determine the pH of the activating agents and activated carbons), Orion™ Dual Star™ pH, ISE Mv, ORP with temperature dual channel bench top meter manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Joel Field Emission Electron Microscope JESM-7600F were used to obtain the elemental compositions of the activated carbons and visualize the surfaces of the samples.


## 2.3. Mathematical Determination of Optimization Boundaries

The Differential Response Technique was used to establish the experimental conditions and parameters of interest include carbonization temperatureX1 and concentration of reagent X2 towards obtaining activated carbon of high adsorption capacity and economic viability. Central composite design was used to determine the minimum number of experiments required. We then calculatedN using(1)N=2n+2n+nc=21+21+0=4,where N is the total number of experiments required, nc is center runs (nc = 0), and n is the number of factors (n=1). Hence, for minimum experimental runs, N is given as 4.We modified the factorial design propounded by Karacan et al. [11]: (2)Y=b0+b1X1+b2X2+b3X3+b4X1X2+b5X1X3+b6X2X3+b7X1X2X3,where Y is the yield, b0 is the global mean, and bi represents the other regression coefficients, where i=1,2,3,…,j.The model formulation depends on carbon yield because it is common to all variables. The number of terms equals the number of experiments; hence(3)Y=b0+b1X1X2+b2X1X22.For every difference in yield (Y+ΔY), it is as a result of an increase in the input variables (X1+ΔX1) and (X2+ΔX2), therefore, (4a)Y+ΔY=b0+b1X1+ΔX1X2+ΔX2+b2X1+ΔX1X2+ΔX22.Subtract (3) from (4a)(4b)ΔY=b1X2ΔX1+b1X1ΔX2+b1ΔX1ΔX2+2b2X12X2ΔX2+b2X12ΔX22+2b2X1X22ΔX1+4b2X1X2ΔX1ΔX2+2b2X1ΔX1ΔX22+b2X22ΔX12+2b2X2ΔX12ΔX2+b2ΔX12ΔX22.Divide through by ΔX1 and set ΔX1→0. The above equation then gives(5)dYdX1=b1X2+ΔX2+b22X1X22+4X1X2ΔX2+2X1ΔX22,(6)d2YdX12=b22X22+4X2ΔX2+2ΔX22=2b2X2+ΔX22.We take the second differential equation by dividing (4a) through by ΔX2 and set ΔX2→0. (7)dYdX2=b1X1+ΔX1+b22X2X12+4X1X2ΔX1+2X2ΔX12,d2YdX22=b22X12+4X1ΔX1+2ΔX12=2b2X1+ΔX12.From (5), (8)d2YdX1X2=b1+b24X1X2+4X1+2X1ΔX2.From (6),(9)d2YdX2X1=b1+b24X1X2+4X2+2X2ΔX1.The coefficients in (5)–(9) above act as normalizing agents. The optimum condition for minimum experimental runs is very difficult to draw conclusions from; however, the DRT has the ability to monitor minute changes. The solution of (9) was chosen because of the role of concentration of chemical reagent for minimum experimental runs. However, we recommend the solutions of (5)–(8) for higher experimental runs. For economic reasons, few experimental runs were considered as they help to understudy the weaknesses and strengths of the approach adopted.


## 3. Method

### 3.1. Procedure

The procedure for preparing the activated carbon samples is discussed as follows.


#### 3.1.1. Preparation of the Raw Material

Coconut shells of the West African tall tree variety, about 90 ft tall, were collected from Okiewo in Edo state, Nigeria. To remove moisture, they were sun-dried for 3 days. The shells were pulverized and sieved using the 0.15 mm size sieve of the automated sieve shaker in order to obtain uniform fines with increased surface area.


#### 3.1.2. Dye Solution for Adsorptive Performance Test

Methylene blue dye solution was used to test the performance of the activated carbons.


#### 3.1.3. Calibration Curve for Methylene Blue

To test for the adsorptive performance of the activated carbon samples, a produced activated carbon sample was mixed with a 50 mL fixed concentration of methylene blue dye solution at 1 g/L for 2 hours. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate was then analysed using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer to get the absorbance of dye solution. Different concentrations of dye solutions in the range of 1 mgL−1 to 1000 mg L−1, as shown in Table 1, were prepared. They were each mixed with equal portions of the produced activated carbon. The mixtures were filtered and the filtrates were analysed using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer. A calibration graph (plot of absorbance against residual concentration of methylene blue solution, Beer Lambert’s plot) was then obtained from which the absorbance of each activated carbon sample was determined. From (10), the adsorptive capacities of the activated carbon samples were calculated: (10)adsorptive  capacity%=Co-CCo×100,where Co is the initial concentration of dye;C is the concentration of dye after adsorption.Table 1
Concentration variation with absorbance for the methylene blue solutions, methylene blue wavelength (665 nm).
Concentration (mg/L)
Absorbance
0
0
1
0.263
2
0.412
10
1.424
25
1.595
50
1.653
100
1.727
125
1.754
250
1.842
375
1.909
500
1.959
625
1.992
750
2.051
1000
2.153


### 3.2. Experiments

#### 3.2.1. Experiment  1

Effect of Chemical Agent on Activated Carbon Performance and Yield. 100 mL solutions of 1 M ZnCl2, KOH, and H3PO4 having pH of 5.26, 11.18, and 3.0 at 29°C, respectively, were prepared. Three 7 g portions of the coconut shell samples prepared in Section 3.1.1 were weighed, mixed, and soaked for 24 hours in the ZnCl2, KOH, and H3PO4 labelledS1,S2, andS3, respectively. They were kept in an oven to dry at 105°C. The samples were then heated in a muffle furnace at 575°C. After one hour, the samples were washed with distilled water to remove the residual inorganic matter and excess chemical agent after which they were dried again in the oven at 105°C for 24 hours.Another sample labelledS4 (NAC), that is, coconut shell without any form of chemical impregnation, was prepared by the method described above.The produced activated carbons from samplesS1, S2, S3, andS4 were then weighed to evaluate their carbon yields. Thereafter, the procedure in Section 3.1.3 was used to determine the absorbance of the filtrates by adding 50 mL of the methylene blue dye prepared with the activated carbon for 2 hours and (10) was used to obtain their adsorption capacities.


#### 3.2.2. Experiment  2

Effect of Concentration of Chemical Agent on Activated Carbon Performance and Yield. H3PO4 was chosen for this experiment because the sample activated with H3PO4 in Experiment  1 gave the best adsorptive performance; see Table 5. Five solutions of 0.3 M, 0.5 M, 0.67 M, 1.00 M, and 1.33 M of the acid were made. Five separate 7 g portions of the tall tree coconut shell samples were soaked separately in 100 mL of 0.3 M, 0.5 M, 0.67 M, 1 M, and 1.33 M H3PO4 having pH of 2.2, 2.17, 2.07, 1.98, and 1.96 at 29°C, respectively, for 24 hours. The samples were then labelledA1,A1.5,A2,A3, andA4, respectively, before being heated in the oven at 105°C.In order to find out if the optimum concentration of H3PO4 for producing a very good activated carbon is general for all coconut varieties, shells from a Malayan Yellow Dwarf Variety sourced from Warri area of Delta State Nigeria were also collected, prepared, and processed to yield activated carbon using the procedure in Section 3.1.1 and the adsorptive performances of the carbon samples were determined using the method described in Section 3.2.1 but, here, four parts of the shells obtained from the dwarf variety each weighing 7 g were processed using 100 mL 0.3 M, 0.67 M, 1 M, and 1.33 M H3PO4, respectively. The samples were labelled A1∗, A2∗, A3∗, and A4∗; see Tables 4 and 5 for the yields and adsorptive performance (as described in Section 3.2.1) of the activated carbon samples, respectively.


#### 3.2.3. Experiment  3

Effect of Carbonization Temperature on Activated Carbon Performance and Yield. Four separate 100 mL solutions of 0.67 M H3PO4 having a pH of 2.07 at 29°C were prepared; 0.67 M H3PO4 was selected for this experiment because, in Experiment  2, the activated carbon produced with 0.67 M H3PO4 gave the best adsorptive performance.Four parts of coconut shell samples were weighed and soaked in 100 mL of the four solutions for 24 hours. The first three samples labelledB1,B2, andB3 weighed 7 g each while the last sample (B4) weighed 6.2 g. The samples were dried in the oven at 105°C. The samples were placed in the muffle furnace for carbonization at 450°C (B1), 575°C (B2), 700°C (B3), and 850°C (B4) for 1 hour. The procedure in Section 3.2.1 was repeated so as to evaluate the yield of the activated carbon. In order to determine the adsorptive capacity of the carbon samples, the procedure in Section 3.1.3 was repeated using 50 mL dye solution at 2 hours of adsorption time.


#### 3.2.4. Experiment  4

Effect of Chemical Agent on Physicochemical Properties of the Activated Carbon. In this experiment, the best tall tree variety activated carbon in Section 3.2.3 and commercial activated carbon (CAC) samples were tested for their moisture, ash, and volatile matter contents. Each sample was weighed and carbonized in the muffle furnace at 600°C for 1 hour; the properties were found as follows.(i) Moisture Content. The mass of empty crucible with lid (m1) was first measured and recorded. The sample was then placed in the crucible and the total massm2 was measured. The crucible with sample in it but with its lid removed was heated in an oven at 150°C. After 3 hours, the crucible was covered with its lid and the total massm3 was measured. Equation (11) was used to calculate the percent moisture removed from each sample: (11)moisture  content%=100%×m1-m2m1-m3,wherem1 is the mass of empty crucible with lid (g);m2 is the mass of crucible with lid and sample (g);m3 is the mass of crucible, lid, and dried sample (g).(ii) Ash Content. Some of the sample that gave the best result in Section 3.2.3 was placed in an open crucible of massm4 and the total weight was recorded asm5. The sample was placed in a muffle furnace whose temperature was adjusted to 650°C. After 3 hours, the resultant weightm5 of the crucible and contents was recorded. Using (12), the ash content of the activated carbon sample was obtained: (12)ash  content%=100%×m6-m4m5-m4,wherem4 is the mass of empty crucible in (g);m5 is the mass of crucible plus original sample in (g);m6 is the mass of crucible plus ash in (g).(iii) Volatile Matter Content. Some of the sample with best results in Section 3.2.3 was transferred into a crucible of massm4 and covered with lid; the total weight was recorded asm7. The crucible with sample in it was then placed in the muffle furnace whose temperature was adjusted to 900°C. After 7 minutes, the crucible was removed, allowed to cool, and reweighed; the mass was recorded asm8. The volatile matter content of the activated carbon was obtained from (13)volatile  matter  content%=100%×100m7-m3-mcm7-m8m7-m3100-mc,wherem7 is the mass in g of the crucible, lid, and sample before heating;m8 is the mass in g of the crucible, lid, and content after heating;m3 is the mass in g of the empty crucible and lid; mc is the percentage by mass of moisture in the sample.


#### 3.2.5. Surface Morphology and Elemental Compositions of Activated Carbons

The scanning electron microscope (JESM-7600F) was used to visualize the surfaces of the samples. The samples prepared were mounted on a double-sided carbon tape. The samples were exposed to an electron beam at an accelerating voltage of 15 keV in order to obtain a signal for the SEM studies. The micromarker on the micrographs was used to estimate the pore size (diameter). The elemental composition, which is given in both atomic percent and weight percent that reflects the amount of a particular element in the analysed volume, was obtained with SEM.


## 3.1. Procedure

The procedure for preparing the activated carbon samples is discussed as follows.


### 3.1.1. Preparation of the Raw Material

Coconut shells of the West African tall tree variety, about 90 ft tall, were collected from Okiewo in Edo state, Nigeria. To remove moisture, they were sun-dried for 3 days. The shells were pulverized and sieved using the 0.15 mm size sieve of the automated sieve shaker in order to obtain uniform fines with increased surface area.


### 3.1.2. Dye Solution for Adsorptive Performance Test

Methylene blue dye solution was used to test the performance of the activated carbons.


### 3.1.3. Calibration Curve for Methylene Blue

To test for the adsorptive performance of the activated carbon samples, a produced activated carbon sample was mixed with a 50 mL fixed concentration of methylene blue dye solution at 1 g/L for 2 hours. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate was then analysed using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer to get the absorbance of dye solution. Different concentrations of dye solutions in the range of 1 mgL−1 to 1000 mg L−1, as shown in Table 1, were prepared. They were each mixed with equal portions of the produced activated carbon. The mixtures were filtered and the filtrates were analysed using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer. A calibration graph (plot of absorbance against residual concentration of methylene blue solution, Beer Lambert’s plot) was then obtained from which the absorbance of each activated carbon sample was determined. From (10), the adsorptive capacities of the activated carbon samples were calculated: (10)adsorptive  capacity%=Co-CCo×100,where Co is the initial concentration of dye;C is the concentration of dye after adsorption.Table 1
Concentration variation with absorbance for the methylene blue solutions, methylene blue wavelength (665 nm).
Concentration (mg/L)
Absorbance
0
0
1
0.263
2
0.412
10
1.424
25
1.595
50
1.653
100
1.727
125
1.754
250
1.842
375
1.909
500
1.959
625
1.992
750
2.051
1000
2.153


## 3.1.1. Preparation of the Raw Material

Coconut shells of the West African tall tree variety, about 90 ft tall, were collected from Okiewo in Edo state, Nigeria. To remove moisture, they were sun-dried for 3 days. The shells were pulverized and sieved using the 0.15 mm size sieve of the automated sieve shaker in order to obtain uniform fines with increased surface area.


## 3.1.2. Dye Solution for Adsorptive Performance Test

Methylene blue dye solution was used to test the performance of the activated carbons.


## 3.1.3. Calibration Curve for Methylene Blue

To test for the adsorptive performance of the activated carbon samples, a produced activated carbon sample was mixed with a 50 mL fixed concentration of methylene blue dye solution at 1 g/L for 2 hours. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate was then analysed using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer to get the absorbance of dye solution. Different concentrations of dye solutions in the range of 1 mgL−1 to 1000 mg L−1, as shown in Table 1, were prepared. They were each mixed with equal portions of the produced activated carbon. The mixtures were filtered and the filtrates were analysed using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer. A calibration graph (plot of absorbance against residual concentration of methylene blue solution, Beer Lambert’s plot) was then obtained from which the absorbance of each activated carbon sample was determined. From (10), the adsorptive capacities of the activated carbon samples were calculated: (10)adsorptive  capacity%=Co-CCo×100,where Co is the initial concentration of dye;C is the concentration of dye after adsorption.Table 1
Concentration variation with absorbance for the methylene blue solutions, methylene blue wavelength (665 nm).
Concentration (mg/L)
Absorbance
0
0
1
0.263
2
0.412
10
1.424
25
1.595
50
1.653
100
1.727
125
1.754
250
1.842
375
1.909
500
1.959
625
1.992
750
2.051
1000
2.153


## 3.2. Experiments

### 3.2.1. Experiment  1

Effect of Chemical Agent on Activated Carbon Performance and Yield. 100 mL solutions of 1 M ZnCl2, KOH, and H3PO4 having pH of 5.26, 11.18, and 3.0 at 29°C, respectively, were prepared. Three 7 g portions of the coconut shell samples prepared in Section 3.1.1 were weighed, mixed, and soaked for 24 hours in the ZnCl2, KOH, and H3PO4 labelledS1,S2, andS3, respectively. They were kept in an oven to dry at 105°C. The samples were then heated in a muffle furnace at 575°C. After one hour, the samples were washed with distilled water to remove the residual inorganic matter and excess chemical agent after which they were dried again in the oven at 105°C for 24 hours.Another sample labelledS4 (NAC), that is, coconut shell without any form of chemical impregnation, was prepared by the method described above.The produced activated carbons from samplesS1, S2, S3, andS4 were then weighed to evaluate their carbon yields. Thereafter, the procedure in Section 3.1.3 was used to determine the absorbance of the filtrates by adding 50 mL of the methylene blue dye prepared with the activated carbon for 2 hours and (10) was used to obtain their adsorption capacities.


### 3.2.2. Experiment  2

Effect of Concentration of Chemical Agent on Activated Carbon Performance and Yield. H3PO4 was chosen for this experiment because the sample activated with H3PO4 in Experiment  1 gave the best adsorptive performance; see Table 5. Five solutions of 0.3 M, 0.5 M, 0.67 M, 1.00 M, and 1.33 M of the acid were made. Five separate 7 g portions of the tall tree coconut shell samples were soaked separately in 100 mL of 0.3 M, 0.5 M, 0.67 M, 1 M, and 1.33 M H3PO4 having pH of 2.2, 2.17, 2.07, 1.98, and 1.96 at 29°C, respectively, for 24 hours. The samples were then labelledA1,A1.5,A2,A3, andA4, respectively, before being heated in the oven at 105°C.In order to find out if the optimum concentration of H3PO4 for producing a very good activated carbon is general for all coconut varieties, shells from a Malayan Yellow Dwarf Variety sourced from Warri area of Delta State Nigeria were also collected, prepared, and processed to yield activated carbon using the procedure in Section 3.1.1 and the adsorptive performances of the carbon samples were determined using the method described in Section 3.2.1 but, here, four parts of the shells obtained from the dwarf variety each weighing 7 g were processed using 100 mL 0.3 M, 0.67 M, 1 M, and 1.33 M H3PO4, respectively. The samples were labelled A1∗, A2∗, A3∗, and A4∗; see Tables 4 and 5 for the yields and adsorptive performance (as described in Section 3.2.1) of the activated carbon samples, respectively.


### 3.2.3. Experiment  3

Effect of Carbonization Temperature on Activated Carbon Performance and Yield. Four separate 100 mL solutions of 0.67 M H3PO4 having a pH of 2.07 at 29°C were prepared; 0.67 M H3PO4 was selected for this experiment because, in Experiment  2, the activated carbon produced with 0.67 M H3PO4 gave the best adsorptive performance.Four parts of coconut shell samples were weighed and soaked in 100 mL of the four solutions for 24 hours. The first three samples labelledB1,B2, andB3 weighed 7 g each while the last sample (B4) weighed 6.2 g. The samples were dried in the oven at 105°C. The samples were placed in the muffle furnace for carbonization at 450°C (B1), 575°C (B2), 700°C (B3), and 850°C (B4) for 1 hour. The procedure in Section 3.2.1 was repeated so as to evaluate the yield of the activated carbon. In order to determine the adsorptive capacity of the carbon samples, the procedure in Section 3.1.3 was repeated using 50 mL dye solution at 2 hours of adsorption time.


### 3.2.4. Experiment  4

Effect of Chemical Agent on Physicochemical Properties of the Activated Carbon. In this experiment, the best tall tree variety activated carbon in Section 3.2.3 and commercial activated carbon (CAC) samples were tested for their moisture, ash, and volatile matter contents. Each sample was weighed and carbonized in the muffle furnace at 600°C for 1 hour; the properties were found as follows.(i) Moisture Content. The mass of empty crucible with lid (m1) was first measured and recorded. The sample was then placed in the crucible and the total massm2 was measured. The crucible with sample in it but with its lid removed was heated in an oven at 150°C. After 3 hours, the crucible was covered with its lid and the total massm3 was measured. Equation (11) was used to calculate the percent moisture removed from each sample: (11)moisture  content%=100%×m1-m2m1-m3,wherem1 is the mass of empty crucible with lid (g);m2 is the mass of crucible with lid and sample (g);m3 is the mass of crucible, lid, and dried sample (g).(ii) Ash Content. Some of the sample that gave the best result in Section 3.2.3 was placed in an open crucible of massm4 and the total weight was recorded asm5. The sample was placed in a muffle furnace whose temperature was adjusted to 650°C. After 3 hours, the resultant weightm5 of the crucible and contents was recorded. Using (12), the ash content of the activated carbon sample was obtained: (12)ash  content%=100%×m6-m4m5-m4,wherem4 is the mass of empty crucible in (g);m5 is the mass of crucible plus original sample in (g);m6 is the mass of crucible plus ash in (g).(iii) Volatile Matter Content. Some of the sample with best results in Section 3.2.3 was transferred into a crucible of massm4 and covered with lid; the total weight was recorded asm7. The crucible with sample in it was then placed in the muffle furnace whose temperature was adjusted to 900°C. After 7 minutes, the crucible was removed, allowed to cool, and reweighed; the mass was recorded asm8. The volatile matter content of the activated carbon was obtained from (13)volatile  matter  content%=100%×100m7-m3-mcm7-m8m7-m3100-mc,wherem7 is the mass in g of the crucible, lid, and sample before heating;m8 is the mass in g of the crucible, lid, and content after heating;m3 is the mass in g of the empty crucible and lid; mc is the percentage by mass of moisture in the sample.


### 3.2.5. Surface Morphology and Elemental Compositions of Activated Carbons

The scanning electron microscope (JESM-7600F) was used to visualize the surfaces of the samples. The samples prepared were mounted on a double-sided carbon tape. The samples were exposed to an electron beam at an accelerating voltage of 15 keV in order to obtain a signal for the SEM studies. The micromarker on the micrographs was used to estimate the pore size (diameter). The elemental composition, which is given in both atomic percent and weight percent that reflects the amount of a particular element in the analysed volume, was obtained with SEM.


## 3.2.1. Experiment  1

Effect of Chemical Agent on Activated Carbon Performance and Yield. 100 mL solutions of 1 M ZnCl2, KOH, and H3PO4 having pH of 5.26, 11.18, and 3.0 at 29°C, respectively, were prepared. Three 7 g portions of the coconut shell samples prepared in Section 3.1.1 were weighed, mixed, and soaked for 24 hours in the ZnCl2, KOH, and H3PO4 labelledS1,S2, andS3, respectively. They were kept in an oven to dry at 105°C. The samples were then heated in a muffle furnace at 575°C. After one hour, the samples were washed with distilled water to remove the residual inorganic matter and excess chemical agent after which they were dried again in the oven at 105°C for 24 hours.Another sample labelledS4 (NAC), that is, coconut shell without any form of chemical impregnation, was prepared by the method described above.The produced activated carbons from samplesS1, S2, S3, andS4 were then weighed to evaluate their carbon yields. Thereafter, the procedure in Section 3.1.3 was used to determine the absorbance of the filtrates by adding 50 mL of the methylene blue dye prepared with the activated carbon for 2 hours and (10) was used to obtain their adsorption capacities.


## 3.2.2. Experiment  2

Effect of Concentration of Chemical Agent on Activated Carbon Performance and Yield. H3PO4 was chosen for this experiment because the sample activated with H3PO4 in Experiment  1 gave the best adsorptive performance; see Table 5. Five solutions of 0.3 M, 0.5 M, 0.67 M, 1.00 M, and 1.33 M of the acid were made. Five separate 7 g portions of the tall tree coconut shell samples were soaked separately in 100 mL of 0.3 M, 0.5 M, 0.67 M, 1 M, and 1.33 M H3PO4 having pH of 2.2, 2.17, 2.07, 1.98, and 1.96 at 29°C, respectively, for 24 hours. The samples were then labelledA1,A1.5,A2,A3, andA4, respectively, before being heated in the oven at 105°C.In order to find out if the optimum concentration of H3PO4 for producing a very good activated carbon is general for all coconut varieties, shells from a Malayan Yellow Dwarf Variety sourced from Warri area of Delta State Nigeria were also collected, prepared, and processed to yield activated carbon using the procedure in Section 3.1.1 and the adsorptive performances of the carbon samples were determined using the method described in Section 3.2.1 but, here, four parts of the shells obtained from the dwarf variety each weighing 7 g were processed using 100 mL 0.3 M, 0.67 M, 1 M, and 1.33 M H3PO4, respectively. The samples were labelled A1∗, A2∗, A3∗, and A4∗; see Tables 4 and 5 for the yields and adsorptive performance (as described in Section 3.2.1) of the activated carbon samples, respectively.


## 3.2.3. Experiment  3

Effect of Carbonization Temperature on Activated Carbon Performance and Yield. Four separate 100 mL solutions of 0.67 M H3PO4 having a pH of 2.07 at 29°C were prepared; 0.67 M H3PO4 was selected for this experiment because, in Experiment  2, the activated carbon produced with 0.67 M H3PO4 gave the best adsorptive performance.Four parts of coconut shell samples were weighed and soaked in 100 mL of the four solutions for 24 hours. The first three samples labelledB1,B2, andB3 weighed 7 g each while the last sample (B4) weighed 6.2 g. The samples were dried in the oven at 105°C. The samples were placed in the muffle furnace for carbonization at 450°C (B1), 575°C (B2), 700°C (B3), and 850°C (B4) for 1 hour. The procedure in Section 3.2.1 was repeated so as to evaluate the yield of the activated carbon. In order to determine the adsorptive capacity of the carbon samples, the procedure in Section 3.1.3 was repeated using 50 mL dye solution at 2 hours of adsorption time.


## 3.2.4. Experiment  4

Effect of Chemical Agent on Physicochemical Properties of the Activated Carbon. In this experiment, the best tall tree variety activated carbon in Section 3.2.3 and commercial activated carbon (CAC) samples were tested for their moisture, ash, and volatile matter contents. Each sample was weighed and carbonized in the muffle furnace at 600°C for 1 hour; the properties were found as follows.(i) Moisture Content. The mass of empty crucible with lid (m1) was first measured and recorded. The sample was then placed in the crucible and the total massm2 was measured. The crucible with sample in it but with its lid removed was heated in an oven at 150°C. After 3 hours, the crucible was covered with its lid and the total massm3 was measured. Equation (11) was used to calculate the percent moisture removed from each sample: (11)moisture  content%=100%×m1-m2m1-m3,wherem1 is the mass of empty crucible with lid (g);m2 is the mass of crucible with lid and sample (g);m3 is the mass of crucible, lid, and dried sample (g).(ii) Ash Content. Some of the sample that gave the best result in Section 3.2.3 was placed in an open crucible of massm4 and the total weight was recorded asm5. The sample was placed in a muffle furnace whose temperature was adjusted to 650°C. After 3 hours, the resultant weightm5 of the crucible and contents was recorded. Using (12), the ash content of the activated carbon sample was obtained: (12)ash  content%=100%×m6-m4m5-m4,wherem4 is the mass of empty crucible in (g);m5 is the mass of crucible plus original sample in (g);m6 is the mass of crucible plus ash in (g).(iii) Volatile Matter Content. Some of the sample with best results in Section 3.2.3 was transferred into a crucible of massm4 and covered with lid; the total weight was recorded asm7. The crucible with sample in it was then placed in the muffle furnace whose temperature was adjusted to 900°C. After 7 minutes, the crucible was removed, allowed to cool, and reweighed; the mass was recorded asm8. The volatile matter content of the activated carbon was obtained from (13)volatile  matter  content%=100%×100m7-m3-mcm7-m8m7-m3100-mc,wherem7 is the mass in g of the crucible, lid, and sample before heating;m8 is the mass in g of the crucible, lid, and content after heating;m3 is the mass in g of the empty crucible and lid; mc is the percentage by mass of moisture in the sample.


## 3.2.5. Surface Morphology and Elemental Compositions of Activated Carbons

The scanning electron microscope (JESM-7600F) was used to visualize the surfaces of the samples. The samples prepared were mounted on a double-sided carbon tape. The samples were exposed to an electron beam at an accelerating voltage of 15 keV in order to obtain a signal for the SEM studies. The micromarker on the micrographs was used to estimate the pore size (diameter). The elemental composition, which is given in both atomic percent and weight percent that reflects the amount of a particular element in the analysed volume, was obtained with SEM.


## 4. Results and Discussion

### 4.1. The Calibration Curve

The calibration curve was drawn using the method discussed in Section  3.1.3 at a wavelength of 665 nm. In Table1, concentration of dye in the samples increased with absorbance and the highest absorbance was recorded for the 1000 mg L−1 solution. Figure 1 partly obeys Beer Lambert’s law which states that a linear relationship exists between absorbance and concentration, although the law has conditions for nonlinearity especially for concentrations greater than 0.000001 M. The lowest concentration in the calibration curve of Figure 1 is 1 mgL−1 which is equivalent to 0.0000031 M; hence, a nonlinear plot was obtained.Figure 1
Absorbance versus concentration of the methylene blue dye.


### 4.2. The Effect of Activating Agent on the Carbon

The effect of activating agent was determined in order to ascertain the following.


#### 4.2.1. Adsorptive Performance

In Table2 and Figure 2, the sample with the highest absorbance and adsorptive performance isS4, that is, the NAC. SampleS3 gave the least absorbance but the highest adsorptive performance of 99.9%, hence, the most efficient adsorbent for methylene blue dye. SampleS3 gave the best adsorptive performance followed byS1 because the H3PO4 and ZnCl2 impregnated samples may have resulted in better developed pores compared to other samples at the stated conditions. H3PO4 in carbon precursors splits cellulose fibres and depolymerizes lignin and hemicellulose which results in mechanical resistance decline of the particle, inflammation of the material, and more cross-linked aromatic products. Additional cross-linking may be induced by the presence of phosphates [17]. ZnCl2 exhibits Bronsted-acidity; hence, it donated protons to the particle which helped to break down the cellulose and lignin structures of the particle. Inflammation of the particles occurred as a result of the degradation; hence, there was reduction in mechanical resistance of the carbon particles. The presence of ZnCl2 and H3PO4 in the interior of the particles during carbonization gave rise to some degree of resistance to contraction of their pore volumes.Table 2
Effect of activating agent on adsorptive performance.
Sample
Activating agent
Absorbance
Adsorptive performance (%)
S1
ZnCl2
1.661
94.9
S2
KOH
1.87
70
S3
H3PO4
0.166
99.9
S4
Nil
1.903
45Figure 2
Adsorptive performance for activated carbon.It was suspected that KOH did not react at the 575°C; hence, it could not restrain the shrinking of the pore volume of the carbon particle. In addition, the porous structure of the sample was not well developed compared to those of samplesS1 andS3. Also, the particles pore volume could have been blocked by products of decomposition which reduced its adsorptive capacity.


#### 4.2.2. Activated Carbon Yield

(i) Effect of Type of Chemical Agent on Yield. In Table 3, sampleS1 gave the highest yield of 25% because it underwent the most efficient dehydration during carbonization. For carbonization to be highly effective, complete removal of oxygen and hydrogen is necessary. The degree of conversion of the precursor to carbon varies because of the loss of some amount of carbon with oxygen and hydrogen as CO2, CO, or hydrocarbons. InS1, the ZnCl2 fosters the removal of hydrogen and oxygen probably as water leaving behind the carbon atoms. According to [17], a typical lignocellulosic material comprises about 48% carbon. The highest yield of 25% was obtained probably because of several factors including the carbonization temperature and the ZnCl2 concentration used. Closest to the yield ofS1 is the yield from sampleS3 due to their similar dehydrating effect on the precursor; see Table 3 and Figure 3.Table 3
Effect of activating agent on activated carbon yield.
Sample
Activating agent
Yield (%)
S
1
ZnCl2
25
S
2
KOH
18.3
S
3
H3PO4
23.3
S
4
Nil
16.7Table 4
Effect of activating agent concentration on activated carbon yield.
Samples
H3PO4 concentration (M)
Tall tree variety yield (%) (A1–A4) at 575°C
Dwarf tree variety yield (%) (A1∗–A4∗) at 575°C
A
1, A1∗
0.30
22.4
26.3
A
1.5,—
0.50
24.1
—
A
2, A2∗
0.67
32.8
34.0
A
3, A3∗
1.00
37.9
46.6
A
4, A4∗
1.33
32.3
40.1Table 5
Effect of activating agent concentration on absorbance and adsorptive performance.
Sample
H3PO4 concentration (M)
Absorbance
Adsorptive performance (%)
A
1, A1∗
0.30
0.116, 2.29
99.9, 97
A
1.5, —
0.50
0.066
100, —
A
2, A2∗
0.67
0.04, 1.76
100, 99.7
A
3, A3∗
1.00
1.707, 0.77
91.5, 99.9
A
4, A4∗
1.33
2.36, 3.187
80.2, 71.4Figure 3
Chemical agent versus activated carbon yield.18% yield was obtained for the KOH impregnated sample. The NAC sample gave the lowest yield because there was no dehydrating agent in the sample leading to loss of more carbon atoms along with hydrogen and oxygen; see Figure3.


### 4.3. Effect of Activating Agent Concentration

The effect of activating agent concentration on activated carbon yield was obtained and the results are as seen in Table4.


#### 4.3.1. Effect of Activating Agent Concentration on Activated Carbon Yield

In Table4, the sample impregnated with 1 M H3PO4 gave the highest activated carbon yield while the sample impregnated with 0.3 M of the acid gave the lowest yield for both samples, although that of the dwarf variety is higher; see Table 4. Figure 4(a) shows the variation of the activating agent concentration with activated carbon yield.Figure 4For the activated carbon samplesA1∗, A2∗, A3∗, and A4∗, the yield of the activated carbon also increased with increased concentrations of H3PO4; see Table 4. The value recorded for 1.33 M acid concentration (A4∗) is 40.1% which is 6% higher than the carbon yield obtained with 1 M concentration of H3PO4. The trend observed can be likened to the dehydrating effect of H3PO4 on the precursors during carbonization. Also, samples with higher concentrations of H3PO4 up to 1.33 M lost more atoms of oxygen and hydrogen extracted as water causing an increase in the activated carbon yield.For sampleA4∗, the yield was less by 6% when compared to that of A3∗; thus, the optimum H3PO4 concentration for preparing activated carbon of high yield, with little attention on performance for both species, is 1 M based on the findings of this study; see Table 4.


#### 4.3.2. Effect of Activating Agent Concentration on Adsorptive Performance of Activated Carbon

Based on the DRT, (9) was used to simulate the optimum conditions discussed in Figures 4(b) and 4(c). Figure 4(b) shows an optimization process when temperature controls the chemical reaction. The variation between 0.3 M and 0.97 M shows that processing activated carbon within this concentration range may positively increase the expected carbon yield; this agrees with the experimental results. The results in Figure 4(c) show that concentration may not have positive influence on the yield if further increased. Again, this agrees well with our experiment since, for the tall tree variety, the sample with the best adsorptive performance is the sample impregnated with 0.67 M H3PO4 as described in Section 3.2.2; hence this is the reason it was chosen for the analysis. The carbonization temperature for all samples was 575°C and the activation time was 1 hour.A1,A1.5,A2, andA3 were the activated carbon samples produced using H3PO4 impregnation at 0.3 M, 0.5 M, 0.67 M, and 1 M concentrations, respectively. However, in Table 5, samplesA2 andA1.5 gave the best adsorptive performance of 100% with corresponding absorbance of 0.04 and 0.07, respectively, whereas, for samples A1∗–A4∗ of the dwarf variety, the sample with the best adsorptive performance was sample A3∗ with adsorptive performance of 99.9% and absorbance of 0.76. While the operating conditions remain unaltered, in order that the adsorptive capacity of the activated carbon is maximized, the acid concentration must be kept between 0.3 and 0.67 M for the tall tree sample but between 0.3 and 1 M for the dwarf variety because the activated carbon pore structure tends to be destroyed or expanded above the stated concentrations of H3PO4 which in turn reduces their adsorptive capacities; see Figure 5. Again, for the tall tree variety, sampleA3 shows the highest absorbance but least performance. Absorbance is higher for sampleA1 thanA2. Therefore, the adsorptive performance increased with acid concentration from 0.3 to 0.67 M. The lower performance of sampleA3 may be due to excessive breakdown of the cellulose structure which may cause very little or no modification in the micropores at 575°C. Figures 7(a) and 7(b) give an overview of B1 and its pore size distribution as obtained from SEM analyses.Figure 5
Profile of concentration of H3PO4 with absorbance and adsorptive performance samples.


### 4.4. The Effect of Carbonization Temperature on Activated Carbon Yield

#### 4.4.1. Effect of Carbonization Temperature on Adsorptive Performance of Carbon

In Experiment  3, all samples were impregnated with 0.67 M concentration of H3PO4. Table 6 shows the results obtained for the different samples. There was a slight increase in the adsorptive performance from 99.8% to 100% due to an increase in the carbonization temperature from 450°C to 575°C. At 575°C, it could be seen that the results from the scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis show that more defined/finer pores were formed leading to a higher internal surface area and improved adsorptive properties ofB2; see Figures 8(a) and 8(b) for the structural morphology and pore size distribution of B2 (i.e., in the range of 0.62 μm–1.76 μm) as compared to the morphology and pore size distribution (i.e., in the range of 0.73–2.57) for B1. Also, a decrease in the adsorptive performance of the activated carbon from 100% to 94.8% was observed for samplesB3 andB4, with pore sizes in the range of 0.68–1.50 μm and 0.77–3.77 μm, respectively, for an increase in the carbonization temperature from 575°C to 850°C; see Figures 9(a) and 9(b) and Figures 10(a) and 10(b) for the structural morphologies and pore size distributions of the activated carbons formed at both temperatures, respectively. This may be due to excessive carbonization causing distortion or further expansion of other pore walls between successive neighbouring pores. Furthermore, the phosphate and polyphosphate links formed during the condensation reaction become volatile above 650°C which makes it difficult for these compounds to be able to inhibit contraction of the pore volume thus, giving a decrease in porosity and adsorptive characteristic of the particle.Table 6
Variation of temperature with activated carbon yield for tall tree variety.
Sample
Carbonization temperature (°C)
Performance (%)
Yield (%)
B
1
450
99.8
43.1
B
2
575
100.0
32.8
B
3
700
94.8
24.1
B
4
850
94.8
15.5For the dwarf variety, sampleA3∗ gave even pore size distribution, that is, 1.80 μm, while for sampleA4 the pore size distribution is in the range of 0.53–0.68 μm; see Figures 11(a) and 11(b) and 12(a) and 12(b) respectively, for their morphologies and pore size distributions.


#### 4.4.2. Effect of Carbonization Temperature on Activated Carbon Yield

In Table6 and Figure 6(a), the activated carbon yield reduced at temperatures above 450°C; the same can be seen in Figure 6(b). The decrease in yield was as a result of the expulsion of phosphate compounds and volatile matter from the samples and this is in agreement with the results of Ip et al. [9]. Higher temperatures of 575 to 850°C alter the mesoporous and macroporous structures of the particles and under these conditions, the yield dropped to 15.5%; the highest yield was obtained at 450°C; hence, in order to maximize the yield, the carbonization temperature should be kept at 450°C which corresponds to an activated carbon yield of 43.1%.Figure 6Figure 7
(a) Overview ofB1 from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution of B1 at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)Figure 8Figure 9
(a) Overview ofB3 from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution of B3 at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)Figure 10
(a) Overview ofB4 from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution ofB4 at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)Figure 11
(a) Overview ofA3∗ from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution of A3∗ at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)Figure 12
(a) Overview ofA4∗ from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution of A4∗ at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)In Figure6(b), based on the model, the variation between 450°C and 850°C shows that processing activated carbon at higher temperatures will decrease the expected yield. We also considered a condition when concentration controls the chemical reaction; see Figures 4(b) and 4(c). This shows that concentration of the acid has influence on the yield if further increased which agrees well with the experimental data despite the slight deviations.


### 4.5. Comparing the Sample Activated Carbon with Commercial Activated Carbon

In Table7, comparingB2 and the CAC, a similar adsorptive performance of 100% is indicative of good product efficiency and quality, although the absorbance of the CAC is slightly lower which may be due to the type of activating agent, nature of precursor, carbonization temperature, and concentration of the active agent used to produce the CAC.Table 7
Adsorptive performance and absorbance of the synthesized and commercial activated carbons.
Material
Absorbance
Adsorptive performance (%)
SampleB2
0.04
100
Commercial AC
0.023
100


### 4.6. Physicochemical Properties of the Sample Activated Carbon

In Table8, the physicochemical properties of the activated carbonB2 obtained in Section 3.2.4 are shown with those of the NAC sample.Table 8
Physicochemical properties of the synthesized and commercial activated carbons.
Carbon sample
Moisture content, %
Ash content, %
Volatile matter, %
CAC
5
5.28
68.4
B
2
7
7.2
57(i) Moisture Content. According to Indo German Carbons Limited, the moisture content of activated carbon should be ≤6%. Under standard conditions, moisture has no effect on the performance of activated carbon. The moisture content of the NAC sample was 5% while that of B2 was 7% because the H3PO4 used to impregnate the activated carbon sample was in its aqueous state which added more water to sample B2.(ii) Ash Content. B2 gave ash of about 7.2% while the NAC gave 5.28% ash. This is because the phosphate compounds formed by the acid in B2 increased the volume of the inorganic matter in the activated carbon thus increasing the amount of nonignitable residue left in the furnace. The smaller % ash in the NAC sample is likened to the lack of chemical agent within the precursor. Based on literature, the ash content of CAC is between 2 and 10%; hence that of B2 is acceptable since high percent ash reduces the efficiency of reactivation/regeneration of activated carbons.(iii) Volatile Matter. From the experiment, sample B2 was seen to contain less volatile matter relative to the NAC whose values are 57% and 68.4%, respectively. Sample B2 had lower volatile contents because H3PO4 forms phosphates and polyphosphate esters with hydrogen and oxygen atoms which would have been given off as gases during the carbonization process. Also, the dehydrating effect of the acid caused the water in the material to vaporize; hence, the covalent bond in the carbon matrix was therefore strengthened leaving no room for carbon loss. For the NAC sample, it lacked any chemical agent that could bring about those reactions. Also, the carbon matrix is weaker than that of sample B2 which makes for possible loss of carbon atoms in gaseous forms.The elemental composition of sampleB2 can be found in Table 9 which shows the percentage composition of the atoms in the activated carbon. The percentage atom of carbon in the sample is 88.46% and that of oxygen is 11.04% while for phosphorus trace amount, that is, 0.5%, was found; see also Figure 8(c) for the atomic spectrum of B2 at 600 μm wavelength. Figure 8(d) shows the atomic spectrum of A3∗ with percent weight of carbon, oxygen, aluminium, silicon, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and iron of 36.85%, 45.53%, 2.82%, 0.27%, 12.72%, 0.2%, 0.57%, 0.56%, 0.36%, and 0.7%; that is, the amount of oxygen present is higher than the amount of carbon. Also, the sample can be seen to have high amount of impurities.Table 9
Elemental composition ofB2.
Element
Weight%
Atomic%
C K
84.69
88.46
O K
14.07
11.04
P K
1.24
0.50
Total
100.00
100.00


### 4.7. Solutions pH and pH of Activated Carbon

The pH values of the reagents used are as documented in Table10. The degrees of acidities of the acid solutions are seen to increase with decreased pH. The optimum pH for 0.67 M concentration of the H3PO4 required for making activated carbon of excellent performance from the tall tree variety coconut shell is 2.07 while that for the dwarf variety is 1.98. The pH of B2 is 2.20 while that of A3∗ is 2.08; these values are indicative of the medium/media for activation.Table 10
pH of the solutions (activating agents).
ZnCl2, 1 M29°C
KOH,1 M29°C
(0.3 M H3PO4)29°C
(0.5 M H3PO4)29°C
(0.67 M H3PO4)29°C
(1.00 M H3PO4)29°C
1.33 M (H3PO4)29°C
5.26
11.18
2.20
2.17
2.07
1.98
1.96


### 4.8. Statistical Analyses of Model

Statistical analyses of the performance of the model was carried out considering the model predictions shown in Figures4(b)(i) and (ii), 4(c)(i) and (ii), 6(b)(i) and (ii), and 6(c)(i) and (ii). Table 11 shows that the confidence interval of the model predictions lies between 95 and 99% with the correlation coefficients of the model for concentration effect on yield in Figures 4(b) and 4(c)(i) in the range of 96–99%, while the correlation coefficients for effect of temperature variation on the yield for both varieties as shown in Figures 6(b) and 6(c)(i) and (ii), for both varieties as predicted by the model, are in the range of 96%–99%, which shows that the model predictions agree well with experimental data; see Tables 11 and 12.Table 11
Statistical analysis of model.
Item measured
Optimization (dwarf) Figure4(b)(i)
Optimization (tall) Figure4(b)(ii)
Optimization (dwarf) Figure4(c)(i)
Optimization (tall) Figure4(c)(ii)
Standard error
2.735
6.796
14.334
5.7687
95% confidence interval
8.704
21.625
45.611
18.356
99% confidence interval
15.98
39.696
83.725
33.695
Standard deviation
5.471
13.592
28.668
11.537
Coefficient of variation
0.371
0.5146
0.5148
0.371
Correlation with experiment
0.994
0.9559
0.9559
0.9936Table 12
Statistical analysis of model.
Item measured
Optimization (tall)Figure 6(b)(i)
Optimization (dwarf) Figure6(b)(ii)
Optimization (tall)Figure 6(c)(i)
Optimization (dwarf) Figure6(c)(ii)
Standard error
6.796
2.7353
5.769
14.334
95% confidence interval
21.625
8.7037
18.36
45.611
99% confidence interval
39.696
15.977
33.69
83.725
Standard deviation
13.592
5.4706
11.54
28.668
Coefficient of variation
0.5146
0.3708
0.371
0.5148
Correlation with experiment
0.9559
0.9936
0.994
0.9559


## 4.1. The Calibration Curve

The calibration curve was drawn using the method discussed in Section  3.1.3 at a wavelength of 665 nm. In Table1, concentration of dye in the samples increased with absorbance and the highest absorbance was recorded for the 1000 mg L−1 solution. Figure 1 partly obeys Beer Lambert’s law which states that a linear relationship exists between absorbance and concentration, although the law has conditions for nonlinearity especially for concentrations greater than 0.000001 M. The lowest concentration in the calibration curve of Figure 1 is 1 mgL−1 which is equivalent to 0.0000031 M; hence, a nonlinear plot was obtained.Figure 1
Absorbance versus concentration of the methylene blue dye.


## 4.2. The Effect of Activating Agent on the Carbon

The effect of activating agent was determined in order to ascertain the following.


### 4.2.1. Adsorptive Performance

In Table2 and Figure 2, the sample with the highest absorbance and adsorptive performance isS4, that is, the NAC. SampleS3 gave the least absorbance but the highest adsorptive performance of 99.9%, hence, the most efficient adsorbent for methylene blue dye. SampleS3 gave the best adsorptive performance followed byS1 because the H3PO4 and ZnCl2 impregnated samples may have resulted in better developed pores compared to other samples at the stated conditions. H3PO4 in carbon precursors splits cellulose fibres and depolymerizes lignin and hemicellulose which results in mechanical resistance decline of the particle, inflammation of the material, and more cross-linked aromatic products. Additional cross-linking may be induced by the presence of phosphates [17]. ZnCl2 exhibits Bronsted-acidity; hence, it donated protons to the particle which helped to break down the cellulose and lignin structures of the particle. Inflammation of the particles occurred as a result of the degradation; hence, there was reduction in mechanical resistance of the carbon particles. The presence of ZnCl2 and H3PO4 in the interior of the particles during carbonization gave rise to some degree of resistance to contraction of their pore volumes.Table 2
Effect of activating agent on adsorptive performance.
Sample
Activating agent
Absorbance
Adsorptive performance (%)
S1
ZnCl2
1.661
94.9
S2
KOH
1.87
70
S3
H3PO4
0.166
99.9
S4
Nil
1.903
45Figure 2
Adsorptive performance for activated carbon.It was suspected that KOH did not react at the 575°C; hence, it could not restrain the shrinking of the pore volume of the carbon particle. In addition, the porous structure of the sample was not well developed compared to those of samplesS1 andS3. Also, the particles pore volume could have been blocked by products of decomposition which reduced its adsorptive capacity.


### 4.2.2. Activated Carbon Yield

(i) Effect of Type of Chemical Agent on Yield. In Table 3, sampleS1 gave the highest yield of 25% because it underwent the most efficient dehydration during carbonization. For carbonization to be highly effective, complete removal of oxygen and hydrogen is necessary. The degree of conversion of the precursor to carbon varies because of the loss of some amount of carbon with oxygen and hydrogen as CO2, CO, or hydrocarbons. InS1, the ZnCl2 fosters the removal of hydrogen and oxygen probably as water leaving behind the carbon atoms. According to [17], a typical lignocellulosic material comprises about 48% carbon. The highest yield of 25% was obtained probably because of several factors including the carbonization temperature and the ZnCl2 concentration used. Closest to the yield ofS1 is the yield from sampleS3 due to their similar dehydrating effect on the precursor; see Table 3 and Figure 3.Table 3
Effect of activating agent on activated carbon yield.
Sample
Activating agent
Yield (%)
S
1
ZnCl2
25
S
2
KOH
18.3
S
3
H3PO4
23.3
S
4
Nil
16.7Table 4
Effect of activating agent concentration on activated carbon yield.
Samples
H3PO4 concentration (M)
Tall tree variety yield (%) (A1–A4) at 575°C
Dwarf tree variety yield (%) (A1∗–A4∗) at 575°C
A
1, A1∗
0.30
22.4
26.3
A
1.5,—
0.50
24.1
—
A
2, A2∗
0.67
32.8
34.0
A
3, A3∗
1.00
37.9
46.6
A
4, A4∗
1.33
32.3
40.1Table 5
Effect of activating agent concentration on absorbance and adsorptive performance.
Sample
H3PO4 concentration (M)
Absorbance
Adsorptive performance (%)
A
1, A1∗
0.30
0.116, 2.29
99.9, 97
A
1.5, —
0.50
0.066
100, —
A
2, A2∗
0.67
0.04, 1.76
100, 99.7
A
3, A3∗
1.00
1.707, 0.77
91.5, 99.9
A
4, A4∗
1.33
2.36, 3.187
80.2, 71.4Figure 3
Chemical agent versus activated carbon yield.18% yield was obtained for the KOH impregnated sample. The NAC sample gave the lowest yield because there was no dehydrating agent in the sample leading to loss of more carbon atoms along with hydrogen and oxygen; see Figure3.


## 4.2.1. Adsorptive Performance

In Table2 and Figure 2, the sample with the highest absorbance and adsorptive performance isS4, that is, the NAC. SampleS3 gave the least absorbance but the highest adsorptive performance of 99.9%, hence, the most efficient adsorbent for methylene blue dye. SampleS3 gave the best adsorptive performance followed byS1 because the H3PO4 and ZnCl2 impregnated samples may have resulted in better developed pores compared to other samples at the stated conditions. H3PO4 in carbon precursors splits cellulose fibres and depolymerizes lignin and hemicellulose which results in mechanical resistance decline of the particle, inflammation of the material, and more cross-linked aromatic products. Additional cross-linking may be induced by the presence of phosphates [17]. ZnCl2 exhibits Bronsted-acidity; hence, it donated protons to the particle which helped to break down the cellulose and lignin structures of the particle. Inflammation of the particles occurred as a result of the degradation; hence, there was reduction in mechanical resistance of the carbon particles. The presence of ZnCl2 and H3PO4 in the interior of the particles during carbonization gave rise to some degree of resistance to contraction of their pore volumes.Table 2
Effect of activating agent on adsorptive performance.
Sample
Activating agent
Absorbance
Adsorptive performance (%)
S1
ZnCl2
1.661
94.9
S2
KOH
1.87
70
S3
H3PO4
0.166
99.9
S4
Nil
1.903
45Figure 2
Adsorptive performance for activated carbon.It was suspected that KOH did not react at the 575°C; hence, it could not restrain the shrinking of the pore volume of the carbon particle. In addition, the porous structure of the sample was not well developed compared to those of samplesS1 andS3. Also, the particles pore volume could have been blocked by products of decomposition which reduced its adsorptive capacity.


## 4.2.2. Activated Carbon Yield

(i) Effect of Type of Chemical Agent on Yield. In Table 3, sampleS1 gave the highest yield of 25% because it underwent the most efficient dehydration during carbonization. For carbonization to be highly effective, complete removal of oxygen and hydrogen is necessary. The degree of conversion of the precursor to carbon varies because of the loss of some amount of carbon with oxygen and hydrogen as CO2, CO, or hydrocarbons. InS1, the ZnCl2 fosters the removal of hydrogen and oxygen probably as water leaving behind the carbon atoms. According to [17], a typical lignocellulosic material comprises about 48% carbon. The highest yield of 25% was obtained probably because of several factors including the carbonization temperature and the ZnCl2 concentration used. Closest to the yield ofS1 is the yield from sampleS3 due to their similar dehydrating effect on the precursor; see Table 3 and Figure 3.Table 3
Effect of activating agent on activated carbon yield.
Sample
Activating agent
Yield (%)
S
1
ZnCl2
25
S
2
KOH
18.3
S
3
H3PO4
23.3
S
4
Nil
16.7Table 4
Effect of activating agent concentration on activated carbon yield.
Samples
H3PO4 concentration (M)
Tall tree variety yield (%) (A1–A4) at 575°C
Dwarf tree variety yield (%) (A1∗–A4∗) at 575°C
A
1, A1∗
0.30
22.4
26.3
A
1.5,—
0.50
24.1
—
A
2, A2∗
0.67
32.8
34.0
A
3, A3∗
1.00
37.9
46.6
A
4, A4∗
1.33
32.3
40.1Table 5
Effect of activating agent concentration on absorbance and adsorptive performance.
Sample
H3PO4 concentration (M)
Absorbance
Adsorptive performance (%)
A
1, A1∗
0.30
0.116, 2.29
99.9, 97
A
1.5, —
0.50
0.066
100, —
A
2, A2∗
0.67
0.04, 1.76
100, 99.7
A
3, A3∗
1.00
1.707, 0.77
91.5, 99.9
A
4, A4∗
1.33
2.36, 3.187
80.2, 71.4Figure 3
Chemical agent versus activated carbon yield.18% yield was obtained for the KOH impregnated sample. The NAC sample gave the lowest yield because there was no dehydrating agent in the sample leading to loss of more carbon atoms along with hydrogen and oxygen; see Figure3.


## 4.3. Effect of Activating Agent Concentration

The effect of activating agent concentration on activated carbon yield was obtained and the results are as seen in Table4.


### 4.3.1. Effect of Activating Agent Concentration on Activated Carbon Yield

In Table4, the sample impregnated with 1 M H3PO4 gave the highest activated carbon yield while the sample impregnated with 0.3 M of the acid gave the lowest yield for both samples, although that of the dwarf variety is higher; see Table 4. Figure 4(a) shows the variation of the activating agent concentration with activated carbon yield.Figure 4For the activated carbon samplesA1∗, A2∗, A3∗, and A4∗, the yield of the activated carbon also increased with increased concentrations of H3PO4; see Table 4. The value recorded for 1.33 M acid concentration (A4∗) is 40.1% which is 6% higher than the carbon yield obtained with 1 M concentration of H3PO4. The trend observed can be likened to the dehydrating effect of H3PO4 on the precursors during carbonization. Also, samples with higher concentrations of H3PO4 up to 1.33 M lost more atoms of oxygen and hydrogen extracted as water causing an increase in the activated carbon yield.For sampleA4∗, the yield was less by 6% when compared to that of A3∗; thus, the optimum H3PO4 concentration for preparing activated carbon of high yield, with little attention on performance for both species, is 1 M based on the findings of this study; see Table 4.


### 4.3.2. Effect of Activating Agent Concentration on Adsorptive Performance of Activated Carbon

Based on the DRT, (9) was used to simulate the optimum conditions discussed in Figures 4(b) and 4(c). Figure 4(b) shows an optimization process when temperature controls the chemical reaction. The variation between 0.3 M and 0.97 M shows that processing activated carbon within this concentration range may positively increase the expected carbon yield; this agrees with the experimental results. The results in Figure 4(c) show that concentration may not have positive influence on the yield if further increased. Again, this agrees well with our experiment since, for the tall tree variety, the sample with the best adsorptive performance is the sample impregnated with 0.67 M H3PO4 as described in Section 3.2.2; hence this is the reason it was chosen for the analysis. The carbonization temperature for all samples was 575°C and the activation time was 1 hour.A1,A1.5,A2, andA3 were the activated carbon samples produced using H3PO4 impregnation at 0.3 M, 0.5 M, 0.67 M, and 1 M concentrations, respectively. However, in Table 5, samplesA2 andA1.5 gave the best adsorptive performance of 100% with corresponding absorbance of 0.04 and 0.07, respectively, whereas, for samples A1∗–A4∗ of the dwarf variety, the sample with the best adsorptive performance was sample A3∗ with adsorptive performance of 99.9% and absorbance of 0.76. While the operating conditions remain unaltered, in order that the adsorptive capacity of the activated carbon is maximized, the acid concentration must be kept between 0.3 and 0.67 M for the tall tree sample but between 0.3 and 1 M for the dwarf variety because the activated carbon pore structure tends to be destroyed or expanded above the stated concentrations of H3PO4 which in turn reduces their adsorptive capacities; see Figure 5. Again, for the tall tree variety, sampleA3 shows the highest absorbance but least performance. Absorbance is higher for sampleA1 thanA2. Therefore, the adsorptive performance increased with acid concentration from 0.3 to 0.67 M. The lower performance of sampleA3 may be due to excessive breakdown of the cellulose structure which may cause very little or no modification in the micropores at 575°C. Figures 7(a) and 7(b) give an overview of B1 and its pore size distribution as obtained from SEM analyses.Figure 5
Profile of concentration of H3PO4 with absorbance and adsorptive performance samples.


## 4.3.1. Effect of Activating Agent Concentration on Activated Carbon Yield

In Table4, the sample impregnated with 1 M H3PO4 gave the highest activated carbon yield while the sample impregnated with 0.3 M of the acid gave the lowest yield for both samples, although that of the dwarf variety is higher; see Table 4. Figure 4(a) shows the variation of the activating agent concentration with activated carbon yield.Figure 4For the activated carbon samplesA1∗, A2∗, A3∗, and A4∗, the yield of the activated carbon also increased with increased concentrations of H3PO4; see Table 4. The value recorded for 1.33 M acid concentration (A4∗) is 40.1% which is 6% higher than the carbon yield obtained with 1 M concentration of H3PO4. The trend observed can be likened to the dehydrating effect of H3PO4 on the precursors during carbonization. Also, samples with higher concentrations of H3PO4 up to 1.33 M lost more atoms of oxygen and hydrogen extracted as water causing an increase in the activated carbon yield.For sampleA4∗, the yield was less by 6% when compared to that of A3∗; thus, the optimum H3PO4 concentration for preparing activated carbon of high yield, with little attention on performance for both species, is 1 M based on the findings of this study; see Table 4.


## 4.3.2. Effect of Activating Agent Concentration on Adsorptive Performance of Activated Carbon

Based on the DRT, (9) was used to simulate the optimum conditions discussed in Figures 4(b) and 4(c). Figure 4(b) shows an optimization process when temperature controls the chemical reaction. The variation between 0.3 M and 0.97 M shows that processing activated carbon within this concentration range may positively increase the expected carbon yield; this agrees with the experimental results. The results in Figure 4(c) show that concentration may not have positive influence on the yield if further increased. Again, this agrees well with our experiment since, for the tall tree variety, the sample with the best adsorptive performance is the sample impregnated with 0.67 M H3PO4 as described in Section 3.2.2; hence this is the reason it was chosen for the analysis. The carbonization temperature for all samples was 575°C and the activation time was 1 hour.A1,A1.5,A2, andA3 were the activated carbon samples produced using H3PO4 impregnation at 0.3 M, 0.5 M, 0.67 M, and 1 M concentrations, respectively. However, in Table 5, samplesA2 andA1.5 gave the best adsorptive performance of 100% with corresponding absorbance of 0.04 and 0.07, respectively, whereas, for samples A1∗–A4∗ of the dwarf variety, the sample with the best adsorptive performance was sample A3∗ with adsorptive performance of 99.9% and absorbance of 0.76. While the operating conditions remain unaltered, in order that the adsorptive capacity of the activated carbon is maximized, the acid concentration must be kept between 0.3 and 0.67 M for the tall tree sample but between 0.3 and 1 M for the dwarf variety because the activated carbon pore structure tends to be destroyed or expanded above the stated concentrations of H3PO4 which in turn reduces their adsorptive capacities; see Figure 5. Again, for the tall tree variety, sampleA3 shows the highest absorbance but least performance. Absorbance is higher for sampleA1 thanA2. Therefore, the adsorptive performance increased with acid concentration from 0.3 to 0.67 M. The lower performance of sampleA3 may be due to excessive breakdown of the cellulose structure which may cause very little or no modification in the micropores at 575°C. Figures 7(a) and 7(b) give an overview of B1 and its pore size distribution as obtained from SEM analyses.Figure 5
Profile of concentration of H3PO4 with absorbance and adsorptive performance samples.


## 4.4. The Effect of Carbonization Temperature on Activated Carbon Yield

### 4.4.1. Effect of Carbonization Temperature on Adsorptive Performance of Carbon

In Experiment  3, all samples were impregnated with 0.67 M concentration of H3PO4. Table 6 shows the results obtained for the different samples. There was a slight increase in the adsorptive performance from 99.8% to 100% due to an increase in the carbonization temperature from 450°C to 575°C. At 575°C, it could be seen that the results from the scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis show that more defined/finer pores were formed leading to a higher internal surface area and improved adsorptive properties ofB2; see Figures 8(a) and 8(b) for the structural morphology and pore size distribution of B2 (i.e., in the range of 0.62 μm–1.76 μm) as compared to the morphology and pore size distribution (i.e., in the range of 0.73–2.57) for B1. Also, a decrease in the adsorptive performance of the activated carbon from 100% to 94.8% was observed for samplesB3 andB4, with pore sizes in the range of 0.68–1.50 μm and 0.77–3.77 μm, respectively, for an increase in the carbonization temperature from 575°C to 850°C; see Figures 9(a) and 9(b) and Figures 10(a) and 10(b) for the structural morphologies and pore size distributions of the activated carbons formed at both temperatures, respectively. This may be due to excessive carbonization causing distortion or further expansion of other pore walls between successive neighbouring pores. Furthermore, the phosphate and polyphosphate links formed during the condensation reaction become volatile above 650°C which makes it difficult for these compounds to be able to inhibit contraction of the pore volume thus, giving a decrease in porosity and adsorptive characteristic of the particle.Table 6
Variation of temperature with activated carbon yield for tall tree variety.
Sample
Carbonization temperature (°C)
Performance (%)
Yield (%)
B
1
450
99.8
43.1
B
2
575
100.0
32.8
B
3
700
94.8
24.1
B
4
850
94.8
15.5For the dwarf variety, sampleA3∗ gave even pore size distribution, that is, 1.80 μm, while for sampleA4 the pore size distribution is in the range of 0.53–0.68 μm; see Figures 11(a) and 11(b) and 12(a) and 12(b) respectively, for their morphologies and pore size distributions.


### 4.4.2. Effect of Carbonization Temperature on Activated Carbon Yield

In Table6 and Figure 6(a), the activated carbon yield reduced at temperatures above 450°C; the same can be seen in Figure 6(b). The decrease in yield was as a result of the expulsion of phosphate compounds and volatile matter from the samples and this is in agreement with the results of Ip et al. [9]. Higher temperatures of 575 to 850°C alter the mesoporous and macroporous structures of the particles and under these conditions, the yield dropped to 15.5%; the highest yield was obtained at 450°C; hence, in order to maximize the yield, the carbonization temperature should be kept at 450°C which corresponds to an activated carbon yield of 43.1%.Figure 6Figure 7
(a) Overview ofB1 from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution of B1 at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)Figure 8Figure 9
(a) Overview ofB3 from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution of B3 at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)Figure 10
(a) Overview ofB4 from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution ofB4 at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)Figure 11
(a) Overview ofA3∗ from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution of A3∗ at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)Figure 12
(a) Overview ofA4∗ from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution of A4∗ at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)In Figure6(b), based on the model, the variation between 450°C and 850°C shows that processing activated carbon at higher temperatures will decrease the expected yield. We also considered a condition when concentration controls the chemical reaction; see Figures 4(b) and 4(c). This shows that concentration of the acid has influence on the yield if further increased which agrees well with the experimental data despite the slight deviations.


## 4.4.1. Effect of Carbonization Temperature on Adsorptive Performance of Carbon

In Experiment  3, all samples were impregnated with 0.67 M concentration of H3PO4. Table 6 shows the results obtained for the different samples. There was a slight increase in the adsorptive performance from 99.8% to 100% due to an increase in the carbonization temperature from 450°C to 575°C. At 575°C, it could be seen that the results from the scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis show that more defined/finer pores were formed leading to a higher internal surface area and improved adsorptive properties ofB2; see Figures 8(a) and 8(b) for the structural morphology and pore size distribution of B2 (i.e., in the range of 0.62 μm–1.76 μm) as compared to the morphology and pore size distribution (i.e., in the range of 0.73–2.57) for B1. Also, a decrease in the adsorptive performance of the activated carbon from 100% to 94.8% was observed for samplesB3 andB4, with pore sizes in the range of 0.68–1.50 μm and 0.77–3.77 μm, respectively, for an increase in the carbonization temperature from 575°C to 850°C; see Figures 9(a) and 9(b) and Figures 10(a) and 10(b) for the structural morphologies and pore size distributions of the activated carbons formed at both temperatures, respectively. This may be due to excessive carbonization causing distortion or further expansion of other pore walls between successive neighbouring pores. Furthermore, the phosphate and polyphosphate links formed during the condensation reaction become volatile above 650°C which makes it difficult for these compounds to be able to inhibit contraction of the pore volume thus, giving a decrease in porosity and adsorptive characteristic of the particle.Table 6
Variation of temperature with activated carbon yield for tall tree variety.
Sample
Carbonization temperature (°C)
Performance (%)
Yield (%)
B
1
450
99.8
43.1
B
2
575
100.0
32.8
B
3
700
94.8
24.1
B
4
850
94.8
15.5For the dwarf variety, sampleA3∗ gave even pore size distribution, that is, 1.80 μm, while for sampleA4 the pore size distribution is in the range of 0.53–0.68 μm; see Figures 11(a) and 11(b) and 12(a) and 12(b) respectively, for their morphologies and pore size distributions.


## 4.4.2. Effect of Carbonization Temperature on Activated Carbon Yield

In Table6 and Figure 6(a), the activated carbon yield reduced at temperatures above 450°C; the same can be seen in Figure 6(b). The decrease in yield was as a result of the expulsion of phosphate compounds and volatile matter from the samples and this is in agreement with the results of Ip et al. [9]. Higher temperatures of 575 to 850°C alter the mesoporous and macroporous structures of the particles and under these conditions, the yield dropped to 15.5%; the highest yield was obtained at 450°C; hence, in order to maximize the yield, the carbonization temperature should be kept at 450°C which corresponds to an activated carbon yield of 43.1%.Figure 6Figure 7
(a) Overview ofB1 from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution of B1 at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)Figure 8Figure 9
(a) Overview ofB3 from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution of B3 at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)Figure 10
(a) Overview ofB4 from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution ofB4 at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)Figure 11
(a) Overview ofA3∗ from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution of A3∗ at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)Figure 12
(a) Overview ofA4∗ from SEM analysis; (b) pore size distribution of A4∗ at ×5000 magnification.
(a)
(b)In Figure6(b), based on the model, the variation between 450°C and 850°C shows that processing activated carbon at higher temperatures will decrease the expected yield. We also considered a condition when concentration controls the chemical reaction; see Figures 4(b) and 4(c). This shows that concentration of the acid has influence on the yield if further increased which agrees well with the experimental data despite the slight deviations.


## 4.5. Comparing the Sample Activated Carbon with Commercial Activated Carbon

In Table7, comparingB2 and the CAC, a similar adsorptive performance of 100% is indicative of good product efficiency and quality, although the absorbance of the CAC is slightly lower which may be due to the type of activating agent, nature of precursor, carbonization temperature, and concentration of the active agent used to produce the CAC.Table 7
Adsorptive performance and absorbance of the synthesized and commercial activated carbons.
Material
Absorbance
Adsorptive performance (%)
SampleB2
0.04
100
Commercial AC
0.023
100


## 4.6. Physicochemical Properties of the Sample Activated Carbon

In Table8, the physicochemical properties of the activated carbonB2 obtained in Section 3.2.4 are shown with those of the NAC sample.Table 8
Physicochemical properties of the synthesized and commercial activated carbons.
Carbon sample
Moisture content, %
Ash content, %
Volatile matter, %
CAC
5
5.28
68.4
B
2
7
7.2
57(i) Moisture Content. According to Indo German Carbons Limited, the moisture content of activated carbon should be ≤6%. Under standard conditions, moisture has no effect on the performance of activated carbon. The moisture content of the NAC sample was 5% while that of B2 was 7% because the H3PO4 used to impregnate the activated carbon sample was in its aqueous state which added more water to sample B2.(ii) Ash Content. B2 gave ash of about 7.2% while the NAC gave 5.28% ash. This is because the phosphate compounds formed by the acid in B2 increased the volume of the inorganic matter in the activated carbon thus increasing the amount of nonignitable residue left in the furnace. The smaller % ash in the NAC sample is likened to the lack of chemical agent within the precursor. Based on literature, the ash content of CAC is between 2 and 10%; hence that of B2 is acceptable since high percent ash reduces the efficiency of reactivation/regeneration of activated carbons.(iii) Volatile Matter. From the experiment, sample B2 was seen to contain less volatile matter relative to the NAC whose values are 57% and 68.4%, respectively. Sample B2 had lower volatile contents because H3PO4 forms phosphates and polyphosphate esters with hydrogen and oxygen atoms which would have been given off as gases during the carbonization process. Also, the dehydrating effect of the acid caused the water in the material to vaporize; hence, the covalent bond in the carbon matrix was therefore strengthened leaving no room for carbon loss. For the NAC sample, it lacked any chemical agent that could bring about those reactions. Also, the carbon matrix is weaker than that of sample B2 which makes for possible loss of carbon atoms in gaseous forms.The elemental composition of sampleB2 can be found in Table 9 which shows the percentage composition of the atoms in the activated carbon. The percentage atom of carbon in the sample is 88.46% and that of oxygen is 11.04% while for phosphorus trace amount, that is, 0.5%, was found; see also Figure 8(c) for the atomic spectrum of B2 at 600 μm wavelength. Figure 8(d) shows the atomic spectrum of A3∗ with percent weight of carbon, oxygen, aluminium, silicon, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and iron of 36.85%, 45.53%, 2.82%, 0.27%, 12.72%, 0.2%, 0.57%, 0.56%, 0.36%, and 0.7%; that is, the amount of oxygen present is higher than the amount of carbon. Also, the sample can be seen to have high amount of impurities.Table 9
Elemental composition ofB2.
Element
Weight%
Atomic%
C K
84.69
88.46
O K
14.07
11.04
P K
1.24
0.50
Total
100.00
100.00


## 4.7. Solutions pH and pH of Activated Carbon

The pH values of the reagents used are as documented in Table10. The degrees of acidities of the acid solutions are seen to increase with decreased pH. The optimum pH for 0.67 M concentration of the H3PO4 required for making activated carbon of excellent performance from the tall tree variety coconut shell is 2.07 while that for the dwarf variety is 1.98. The pH of B2 is 2.20 while that of A3∗ is 2.08; these values are indicative of the medium/media for activation.Table 10
pH of the solutions (activating agents).
ZnCl2, 1 M29°C
KOH,1 M29°C
(0.3 M H3PO4)29°C
(0.5 M H3PO4)29°C
(0.67 M H3PO4)29°C
(1.00 M H3PO4)29°C
1.33 M (H3PO4)29°C
5.26
11.18
2.20
2.17
2.07
1.98
1.96


## 4.8. Statistical Analyses of Model

Statistical analyses of the performance of the model was carried out considering the model predictions shown in Figures4(b)(i) and (ii), 4(c)(i) and (ii), 6(b)(i) and (ii), and 6(c)(i) and (ii). Table 11 shows that the confidence interval of the model predictions lies between 95 and 99% with the correlation coefficients of the model for concentration effect on yield in Figures 4(b) and 4(c)(i) in the range of 96–99%, while the correlation coefficients for effect of temperature variation on the yield for both varieties as shown in Figures 6(b) and 6(c)(i) and (ii), for both varieties as predicted by the model, are in the range of 96%–99%, which shows that the model predictions agree well with experimental data; see Tables 11 and 12.Table 11
Statistical analysis of model.
Item measured
Optimization (dwarf) Figure4(b)(i)
Optimization (tall) Figure4(b)(ii)
Optimization (dwarf) Figure4(c)(i)
Optimization (tall) Figure4(c)(ii)
Standard error
2.735
6.796
14.334
5.7687
95% confidence interval
8.704
21.625
45.611
18.356
99% confidence interval
15.98
39.696
83.725
33.695
Standard deviation
5.471
13.592
28.668
11.537
Coefficient of variation
0.371
0.5146
0.5148
0.371
Correlation with experiment
0.994
0.9559
0.9559
0.9936Table 12
Statistical analysis of model.
Item measured
Optimization (tall)Figure 6(b)(i)
Optimization (dwarf) Figure6(b)(ii)
Optimization (tall)Figure 6(c)(i)
Optimization (dwarf) Figure6(c)(ii)
Standard error
6.796
2.7353
5.769
14.334
95% confidence interval
21.625
8.7037
18.36
45.611
99% confidence interval
39.696
15.977
33.69
83.725
Standard deviation
13.592
5.4706
11.54
28.668
Coefficient of variation
0.5146
0.3708
0.371
0.5148
Correlation with experiment
0.9559
0.9936
0.994
0.9559


## 5. Conclusion

Coconut shell activated carbon with excellent adsorptive properties can be produced using H3PO4 concentrations between 0.3 and 1 M. 0.67 M phosphoric acid gave the best adsorptive performance and absorbance for the activated carbon synthesized from the tall tree variety. Increase in carbonization temperature caused a decrease in the activated carbon yield. Activated carbon produced at 575°C gave the highest adsorptive performance of 100%. However, because of the relative difference (10%) in activated carbon yield of B1 relative to B2 and the slight variation of 0.2% in their adsorptive performances, the optimum temperature for producing activated carbon of the tall tree variety therefore lies between 450 and 575°C. The activating agents increased the ash and moisture contents of the carbon particles and decreased their volatile constituents. Based on the findings of this research, the optimum H3PO4 concentration and pH for preparing activated carbon of high yield from the tall and the dwarf variety coconut shells are 0.67 M and 2.07, respectively; higher concentrations above the optimum value gave lower yields for both varieties. The optimum temperatures were found to be in the range of 450–575°C for the tall tree variety coconut shell activated carbon, while, for the dwarf variety activated carbon, the optimum temperature was found to be 575°C. Also, based on the results in Table 10, the optimum pH for producing activated carbon with the best adsorptive performance using phosphoric acid from the tall tree variety is 2.07 while that of the dwarf variety was found to be 1.98 of the acid solution. Based on the statistical analyses, the model’s confidence interval between 95 and 99% gives correlation coefficient values with levels of accuracy in the range of 96–99%; hence, the model results agree well with data generated experimentally.



---

*Source: 2801359-2017-08-03.xml*