# Chemical Profiling of Xueshuan Xinmaining Tablet by HPLC and UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS

Authors: Ya-Xin Han; Peng-Fei Wang; Meng Zhao; Liang-Mian Chen; Zhi-Min Wang; Xiao-Qian Liu; Hui-Min Gao; Mu-Xin Gong; Hui Li; Ji-Zhong Zhu; Chuan-Gui Liu
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Xueshuan Xinmaining Tablet (XXT) is a widely used traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of stroke, chest pain, coronary heart disease, and angina pectoris caused by blood stasis. Having a multiple-component preparation, it is still far from meeting the requirements of modernization and standardization because its detailed chemical basis and action mechanism have not been clarified. In this work, the different batches of XXT samples were analyzed by HPLC and the typical sample was analyzed by UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS to understand its chemical profiling. As a result, 77 chromatographic peaks were detected, among which 63 constituents were identified or tentatively characterized based on the comparison of retention time and UV spectra with authentic compounds as well as by summarized MS fragmentation rules and matching of empirical molecular formula with those of published components. This is the first systematic report on the chemical profiling of the commercial XXT products, which provides the sufficiently chemical evidence for the global quality evaluation of XXT products.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Xueshuan Xinmaining Tablet (XXT) is a widely used traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of stroke, chest pain, coronary heart disease, and angina pectoris caused by blood stasis [1]. It is prepared from ten raw materials, including Chuanxiong (Chuanxiong rhizoma), Huaihua (Sophorae flos), Danshen (Salviae miltiorrhizae radix et rhizoma), Shuizhi (Hirudo), Maodongqing (Hairy holly root), Rengong Niuhuang (Bovis calculus artifactus), Rengong Shexiang (Moschus artifactus), Renshen Jingye Zongzaogan (Total ginsenoside of ginseng stems and leaves), Bingpian (Borneolum syntheticum), and Chansu (Bufonis venenum) [2]. Nowadays, several qualitative analyses have been reported concerning volatile constituents by GC-MS [3] and chemical fingerprints by HPLC-ELSD [4] and UPLC-PDA [5]. However, having a multiple-component preparation, it is still far from meeting the requirement of modernization and standardization because its complicated ingredients lead to difficulty in clarifying therapeutic material basis, establishing quality control strategy, or selecting chemical markers for pharmacokinetic study.Ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS) has become one of the most effective tools for the on-line structural elucidation of multiple components of TCM, owing to its characteristics of accurate mass measurement, high resolution, and excellent sensitivity.MSE (E represents collision energy) technology provides an automated strategy to decrease analysis time and maximize duty cycles by using parallel alternating scans at low collision energy in the collision cell to obtain precursor ion information or at high collision energy to obtain accurate full-scan mass fragment, precursor ion, and neutral loss information. Therefore, both precursor and fragmentation data in exact mass mode were collected in a single run. This method has been proved to provide excellent chromatographic and MS efficiencies in the previous publications [6]. In the present investigation, a combination of HPLC and UPLC-Q-TOF/MS analyses was employed to find out and identify the common chemical profile in various batches of XXT samples. A total of 63 constituents were identified or tentatively characterized based on the comparison with reference substances, on-line UV spectra, and the fragmentation rules.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials and Reagents

Ten batches of Xueshuan Xinmaining Tablet (Lot. 160904, 160905, 161001-161008) were provided byJilin Huakang Stock Ltd., Company of Medicines (Jilin, China). Reference substances of sodium danshensu (Lot. ZZS17032207), rosmarinic acid (Lot. ZZS17032201), salvianolic acid B (Lot. ZZS17032203), dihydrotanshinone (Lot. ZZS17032209), cryptotanshinone (Lot. ZZS17032204), and tanshinone IIA (Lot. ZZS17032206) were purchased fromShanghai ZZBIO Co,(Shanghai, China). Reference substances of neochlorogenic acid (Lot. X-014-140801), isochlorogenic acid B (Lot. Y-069-141122-1), and isochlorogenic acid C (Lot. Y-070-140801) were purchased fromChengdu Herbpurify Co. (Chengdu, China). Reference isochlorogenic acid A (Lot. 20130816) were purchased fromShanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co. (Shanghai, China). Reference substances of caffeic acid (Lot. 110885-200102), ginsenoside Rg1 (Lot. 110703-201027), ginsenoside Re (Lot. 110754-200822), ginsenoside Rb2 (Lot. 111715-200802), ginsenoside Rb3 (Lot. 111686-201002), 20S-ginsenoside F1 (Lot. 111763-200601), 20S-ginsenoside F2 (Lot. 111764-200601), 20S-ginsenoside Rh2 (Lot. 111748-200501), cinobufagin (Lot. 110803-200605), and resibufogenin (Lot. 110718-200507) were purchased from the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (Beijing, China). Gamabufotalin, bufotalin, and bufalin were purified from the fresh toad venom (the purity of gamabufotalin was over 92.9% and the purity of bufotalin and bufalin was over 98% based on the area normalization by HPLC analysis). Ginsenoside Rd, chlorogenic acid, rutin, quercetin, protocatechualdehyde, ursodesoxycholic acid, and chenodeoxycholic acid were from the collection of our laboratory and their purities were over 98%. The structures of all reference compounds were shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Structures of the identified compounds in XXT sample.HPLC grade acetonitrile and formic acid (Fisher, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA) and ultrapure water were used. All other chemical reagents were of analytical grade fromBeijing Chemical Corporation (Beijing, China).


### 2.2. Reference Solution Preparation

Stock solution with a concentration of about 0.1 g·L−1 was prepared by dissolving an accurately weighed amount of each reference substance in methanol.


### 2.3. Sample Preparation

#### 2.3.1. XXT Sample

1.0 g (about 2.5 tablets) of pulverized XXT sample was extracted with methanol (25 mL) by ultrasonication (200 w, 53 kHz) for 30 min at room temperature, and the extract was centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 rpm. The supernatant was evaporated at 80°C and the residue was dissolved with aqueous methanol (MeOH-H2O, 9:1). The obtained solution was centrifuged for 5 min at 12000 rpm. A volume of 10 μL of the supernatant was used for HPLC analysis.1 ml of the sample solution for HPLC analysis was diluted to a volume of 10 mL and used for UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS analysis.


#### 2.3.2. Raw Materials

The ethanolic and aqueous extracts of individual herb (Danshen, Maodongqing, Shuizhi, Chuanxiong, and Huaihua) were prepared according to the manufacturing processes of XXT (FigureS1) described in the current Chinese Pharmacopoeia [2]. The ethanolic and aqueous extracts along with Rengong Shexiang, Rengong Niuhuang, Renshen Jingye Zongzaogan, Bingpian, and Chansu were dissolved with aqueous methanol solution (MeOH-H2O, 9:1) according to the method described in Section 2.3.1 and used for the comparative analyses on the possible contribution from individual herb to general chromatographic profile of XXT samples.


### 2.4. Qualitative HPLC Analyses of 10 Batches of XXT Samples

The analyses were performed on a Shimadzu HPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with an LC-20AT binary pump, a DGU-20A5 degasser, an SIL-20AC autosampler, a CTO-20AC column oven, and an SPD-M20A photodiode array detector. The samples were separated on a Waters XTerra C18 column (4.6×250mm, 5μm). The mobile phase consisted of water containing 0.1% acetic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) using a gradient elution program as follows: 0 min, 10% B; 20 min, 25% B; 30 min, 26% B; 45 min, 30% B; 60 min, 60% B; and 95 min, 80% B. The flow rate was 1.0 mL·min−1 and the column temperature was 30°C. The PDA detector recorded UV spectra in the range from 190 nm to 400 nm and HPLC chromatogram was monitored at 251 nm.


### 2.5. UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS Analysis

To comprehensively identify the chemical constituents in XXT samples, a UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS experiment was performed using a Waters Xevo G2-S spectrometer (Waters, America), connected to a Waters UPLC system (Waters, America). The samples were separated on a Waters ACQUITY BEH C18 column (2.1×50 mm, 1.7 μm). The mobile phase consisted of water containing 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) using a gradient elution program as follows: 0 min, 10% B; 4 min, 25% B; 7 min, 25.6% B; 8 min, 36% B; 14 min, 60% B; 18 min, 80% B; and 20 min, 80% B. The mass spectrometer was operated in both positive and negative modes using the following parameters: capillary voltage of 1.8 kV, sample cone voltage of 30 V (ESI+) or 40 V (ESI-), source temperature of 120°C, desolvation temperature of 600°C, and cone gas flow 50 L/h. In MSE mode, the trap collision energy for the low-energy function was set at 6 eV, while the ramp trap collision energy for the high-energy function was set at 25-50 eV. Argon was used as the collision gas for collision-induced dissociation (CID) in MSE and MS2 modes. To ensure mass accuracy and reproducibility, the mass spectrometer was calibrated over a range of 100-2000 Da for MS and 50-2000 Da for MS2. Leucine-enkephalin (m/z 556.2771 in positive ion mode;m/z 554.2615 in negative ion mode) was used as an external reference for the LockSpray and was infused at a constant flow of 5 μL·min−1. The data were recorded in centroid type during acquisition.


## 2.1. Materials and Reagents

Ten batches of Xueshuan Xinmaining Tablet (Lot. 160904, 160905, 161001-161008) were provided byJilin Huakang Stock Ltd., Company of Medicines (Jilin, China). Reference substances of sodium danshensu (Lot. ZZS17032207), rosmarinic acid (Lot. ZZS17032201), salvianolic acid B (Lot. ZZS17032203), dihydrotanshinone (Lot. ZZS17032209), cryptotanshinone (Lot. ZZS17032204), and tanshinone IIA (Lot. ZZS17032206) were purchased fromShanghai ZZBIO Co,(Shanghai, China). Reference substances of neochlorogenic acid (Lot. X-014-140801), isochlorogenic acid B (Lot. Y-069-141122-1), and isochlorogenic acid C (Lot. Y-070-140801) were purchased fromChengdu Herbpurify Co. (Chengdu, China). Reference isochlorogenic acid A (Lot. 20130816) were purchased fromShanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co. (Shanghai, China). Reference substances of caffeic acid (Lot. 110885-200102), ginsenoside Rg1 (Lot. 110703-201027), ginsenoside Re (Lot. 110754-200822), ginsenoside Rb2 (Lot. 111715-200802), ginsenoside Rb3 (Lot. 111686-201002), 20S-ginsenoside F1 (Lot. 111763-200601), 20S-ginsenoside F2 (Lot. 111764-200601), 20S-ginsenoside Rh2 (Lot. 111748-200501), cinobufagin (Lot. 110803-200605), and resibufogenin (Lot. 110718-200507) were purchased from the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (Beijing, China). Gamabufotalin, bufotalin, and bufalin were purified from the fresh toad venom (the purity of gamabufotalin was over 92.9% and the purity of bufotalin and bufalin was over 98% based on the area normalization by HPLC analysis). Ginsenoside Rd, chlorogenic acid, rutin, quercetin, protocatechualdehyde, ursodesoxycholic acid, and chenodeoxycholic acid were from the collection of our laboratory and their purities were over 98%. The structures of all reference compounds were shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Structures of the identified compounds in XXT sample.HPLC grade acetonitrile and formic acid (Fisher, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA) and ultrapure water were used. All other chemical reagents were of analytical grade fromBeijing Chemical Corporation (Beijing, China).


## 2.2. Reference Solution Preparation

Stock solution with a concentration of about 0.1 g·L−1 was prepared by dissolving an accurately weighed amount of each reference substance in methanol.


## 2.3. Sample Preparation

### 2.3.1. XXT Sample

1.0 g (about 2.5 tablets) of pulverized XXT sample was extracted with methanol (25 mL) by ultrasonication (200 w, 53 kHz) for 30 min at room temperature, and the extract was centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 rpm. The supernatant was evaporated at 80°C and the residue was dissolved with aqueous methanol (MeOH-H2O, 9:1). The obtained solution was centrifuged for 5 min at 12000 rpm. A volume of 10 μL of the supernatant was used for HPLC analysis.1 ml of the sample solution for HPLC analysis was diluted to a volume of 10 mL and used for UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS analysis.


### 2.3.2. Raw Materials

The ethanolic and aqueous extracts of individual herb (Danshen, Maodongqing, Shuizhi, Chuanxiong, and Huaihua) were prepared according to the manufacturing processes of XXT (FigureS1) described in the current Chinese Pharmacopoeia [2]. The ethanolic and aqueous extracts along with Rengong Shexiang, Rengong Niuhuang, Renshen Jingye Zongzaogan, Bingpian, and Chansu were dissolved with aqueous methanol solution (MeOH-H2O, 9:1) according to the method described in Section 2.3.1 and used for the comparative analyses on the possible contribution from individual herb to general chromatographic profile of XXT samples.


## 2.3.1. XXT Sample

1.0 g (about 2.5 tablets) of pulverized XXT sample was extracted with methanol (25 mL) by ultrasonication (200 w, 53 kHz) for 30 min at room temperature, and the extract was centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 rpm. The supernatant was evaporated at 80°C and the residue was dissolved with aqueous methanol (MeOH-H2O, 9:1). The obtained solution was centrifuged for 5 min at 12000 rpm. A volume of 10 μL of the supernatant was used for HPLC analysis.1 ml of the sample solution for HPLC analysis was diluted to a volume of 10 mL and used for UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS analysis.


## 2.3.2. Raw Materials

The ethanolic and aqueous extracts of individual herb (Danshen, Maodongqing, Shuizhi, Chuanxiong, and Huaihua) were prepared according to the manufacturing processes of XXT (FigureS1) described in the current Chinese Pharmacopoeia [2]. The ethanolic and aqueous extracts along with Rengong Shexiang, Rengong Niuhuang, Renshen Jingye Zongzaogan, Bingpian, and Chansu were dissolved with aqueous methanol solution (MeOH-H2O, 9:1) according to the method described in Section 2.3.1 and used for the comparative analyses on the possible contribution from individual herb to general chromatographic profile of XXT samples.


## 2.4. Qualitative HPLC Analyses of 10 Batches of XXT Samples

The analyses were performed on a Shimadzu HPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with an LC-20AT binary pump, a DGU-20A5 degasser, an SIL-20AC autosampler, a CTO-20AC column oven, and an SPD-M20A photodiode array detector. The samples were separated on a Waters XTerra C18 column (4.6×250mm, 5μm). The mobile phase consisted of water containing 0.1% acetic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) using a gradient elution program as follows: 0 min, 10% B; 20 min, 25% B; 30 min, 26% B; 45 min, 30% B; 60 min, 60% B; and 95 min, 80% B. The flow rate was 1.0 mL·min−1 and the column temperature was 30°C. The PDA detector recorded UV spectra in the range from 190 nm to 400 nm and HPLC chromatogram was monitored at 251 nm.


## 2.5. UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS Analysis

To comprehensively identify the chemical constituents in XXT samples, a UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS experiment was performed using a Waters Xevo G2-S spectrometer (Waters, America), connected to a Waters UPLC system (Waters, America). The samples were separated on a Waters ACQUITY BEH C18 column (2.1×50 mm, 1.7 μm). The mobile phase consisted of water containing 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) using a gradient elution program as follows: 0 min, 10% B; 4 min, 25% B; 7 min, 25.6% B; 8 min, 36% B; 14 min, 60% B; 18 min, 80% B; and 20 min, 80% B. The mass spectrometer was operated in both positive and negative modes using the following parameters: capillary voltage of 1.8 kV, sample cone voltage of 30 V (ESI+) or 40 V (ESI-), source temperature of 120°C, desolvation temperature of 600°C, and cone gas flow 50 L/h. In MSE mode, the trap collision energy for the low-energy function was set at 6 eV, while the ramp trap collision energy for the high-energy function was set at 25-50 eV. Argon was used as the collision gas for collision-induced dissociation (CID) in MSE and MS2 modes. To ensure mass accuracy and reproducibility, the mass spectrometer was calibrated over a range of 100-2000 Da for MS and 50-2000 Da for MS2. Leucine-enkephalin (m/z 556.2771 in positive ion mode;m/z 554.2615 in negative ion mode) was used as an external reference for the LockSpray and was infused at a constant flow of 5 μL·min−1. The data were recorded in centroid type during acquisition.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Qualitative Analyses of XXT Samples by HPLC

In order to obtain better detection of XXT samples, HPLC conditions were optimized. The acetonitrile-water system displayed more powerful separation ability for the main constituents in all samples than the methanol-water system. When organic acid was added to the mobile phase, the symmetry of most chromatographic peaks was improved. Under optimized conditions, ten batches of XXT samples, together with the reference compounds, were examined and their HPLC chromatograms were shown in Figure2. High similarity in the number, type, and amount of chemical constituents was observed in the HPLC profile of each individual sample, which suggested the chemical consistency of different batches of XXT samples. The characteristic peak 4 (rutin) represents an important active component in XXT sample with a consistently high content, which was chosen as the reference peak for the calculation of the relative retention time ratio and relative peak area ratio of other common chromatographic peaks. For the validation of the assay procedure, the results of precision and repeatability were indicated by RSDs that were less than 4.9% (n=6) for seventeen peaks (Tables S1~S4). The stability test suggested that these peaks were stable in the sample solution within 24 hr (Tables S5~S6).Figure 2
HPLC profiles of Xueshuan Xinmaining Tablet samples at 251 nm (from top to bottom: Lot. 160904, 160905, 161001-161008).To identify the origin of these characteristic peaks from individual raw material, a comparative study was carried out by using various extract of raw materials and XXT samples. Considering the chromatogram recorded at the wavelength of 251 nm, main chromatographic peaks in the HPLC profile were attributed to the following five raw materials: Danshen, Huaihua, Maodongqing, Chuanxiong, and Chansu (FigureS2). The contribution of other raw materials was not manifested, either because of the absence of UV absorption of active compounds or due to the existence of no potent components at the detection condition. More information is expected to further confirm the contribution of each raw material to the general chromatographic profile of XXT sample.


### 3.2. Identification of Chemical Constituents in XXT Sample by UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS

M S E analyses in the positive ion mode and negative ion mode were selected for obtaining extensive structural information via collision-induced dissociation. For the purpose of determining the optimized CE to generate fragment ions for structural elucidation and characterization, MS/MS experiments at different CE values were performed. Under optimized parameters, the total ion chromatogram of XXT samples are shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
TICs of Xueshuan Xinmaining Tablet in the negative and positive modes.The fragmentation behaviors of reference compounds were investigated, and these rules were applied for the structural elucidation of their derivatives with the same basic skeleton. A total of 63 compounds in XXT sample were detected and tentatively characterized by comparing the retention times, MS fragmentation behavior, and literature information. Among these compounds, there were twenty saponins, fifteen phenolic acids, ten quinones, eight steroids, four bile acids, four flavonoids, one amino acid, and one lactone. Their chemical structures are provided in Figure1. For better understanding of the fragmentation behavior, 63 compounds were divided into several groups and deduced as follows. The chromatographic and mass data of the identified constituents were summarized in Table 1.Table 1
Retention time (tR), UV, and MS data of the identified compounds in XXT samples.
No. t R/min UV Identified compounds Formula [M+H]+/[M+Na]+ Calc.mass Δppm [M-H]- Calc.mass Δppm [M+HCOO]-/[2M-H]- Calc.mass Δppm Sourcea λ m a x/nm 1 1.03 282 danshensu C 9 H 10 O 5    197.0446 197.0450 -2.5 /395.0974 395.0978 -1.0 DS 2 1.22 295 neochlorogenic acid C 16 H 18 O 9    353.0869 353.0873 -1.1    DS/MDQ 3 1.59  suberyl arginine C 14 H 26 O 5 N 4 331.1977/ 331.1981 -1.2 329.1819 329.1825 -1.8    CS 4 1.83 320 chlorogenic acid C 16 H 18 O 9 355.1026/ 355.1029 -0.8 353.0876 353.0873 0.8 /707.1840 707.1823 2.4 DS/MDQ 5 1.83 220, 318 protocatechuic aldehyde C 7 H 6 O 3    137.0235/ 137.0239 -2.9    DS 6 1.99 233 cryptochlorogenic acid  /377.0854   353.0871      DS/MDQ 7 2.28 232, 318 caffeic acid C 9 H 8 O 4    179.0341 179.0344 -1.7    DS 8 3.41 244, 329 unidentified  /465.1384   441.1395 9 3.68 254, 352 rutin C 27 H 30 O 16 611.1618/ 611.1612 1.0 609.1458 609.1456 0.3 /1219.3020 1219.2989 2.5 HH 10 4.31 264, 343 kaempferol-3-O- C 27 H 30 O 15 595.1652/ 595.1663 -1.8 593.1505 593.1506 -0.1    HH rutinoside  /617.1472 617.1482 -1.6 11 4.35 244, 327 isochlorogenic acid B C 25 H 24 O 12 517.1331/ 517.1346 -2.9 515.1188 515.1190 -0.4    DS/MDQ /539.1177 539.1165 2.2 12 4.39 244, 327 salvianolic acid H C 27 H 22 O 12 539.1149/ 539.1190 -7.6 537.1031 537.1033 -0.4    DS 13 4.42 252, 339 isorhamnetin 3-O-rutinoside C 28 H 32 O 16 625.1754/ 625.1769 -2.4 623.1616 623.1612 0.6    HH /647.1578 647.1588 -1.5 14 4.50 329 isochlorogenic acid A C 25 H 24 O 12 /539.1154 539.1165 -2.0 515.1193 515.1190 0.6    DS/MDQ 15 4.90 244, 326 isochlorogenic acid C C 25 H 24 O 12 517.1359/ 517.1346 2.5 515.1192 515.1190 0.4    DS/MDQ /539.1176 539.1165 2.0 16 5.02 244, 329 rosmarinic acid C 18 H 16 O 8    359.0766 359.0767 -0.3 /719.1610 719.1612 -0.3 DS 17 5.13 250, 306 salvianolic acid G C 18 H 12 O 7 341.0666/ 341.0661 1.5       DS 18 5.17 251, 317 salvianolic acid A C 26 H 22 O 10    493.1134 493.1135 0.2    DS 19 5.28  gamabufotalin C 24 H 34 O 5 403.2483/ 403.2484 -0.2    447.2381/ 447.2383 -0.4 CS 20 5.32  bufarenogin C 24 H 32 O 6 417.2273/ 417.2277 -1.0       CS 21 5.43 276 4-hydroxyl-3-butylphthalide C 12 H 14 O 3 207.1024/ 207.1021 1.4       CX 22 5.53 232 salvianolic acid B C 36 H 30 O 16    717.1475 717.1456 2.6    DS 23 6.17  ginsenoside Rg1 C 42 H 72 O 14 /823.4792 823.4820 -3.4    845.4905/ 845.4899 0.7 RSZZG 24 6.24  ginsenoside Re C 48 H 82 O 18 /969.5378 969.5399 -2.2 945.5450 945.5423 2.9 991.5548/ 991.5478 7.1 RSZZG 25 6.44  arenobufagin C 24 H 32 O 6 417.2271/ 417.2277 -1.4 415.2111 415.2121 -2.4 461.2168/ 461.2175 -1.5 CS 26 6.45  quercetin C 15 H 10 O 7 303.0506/ 303.0505 0.3 301.0346 301.0348 -0.7    HH 27 6.71  unidentified  765.2371 28 6.99  unidentified  /677.4221      699.4323/ 29 7.17 245, 328 hellebrigenin C 24 H 32 O 6 417.2274 417.2277 -0.7    461.2173/ 461.2175  CS 30 7.25  unidentified     677.1508 31 7.49  tanshindiol A C 18 H 16 O 5 313.1079/ 313.1076 1.0       DS /335.0901 335.0895 1.8 32 8.14  ethyl lithospermate C 29 H 26 O 12 567.1498/ 567.1503 -0.9 565.1342 565.1346 -0.1    DS /589.1320 589.1322 -0.3 33 8.49  unidentified  /755.1589   731.1622 34 8.65  unidentified  /1117.5740      1139.5891/ 35 9.01  20S-glc-ginsenoside Rf C 48 H 82 O 19 /985.5332 985.5348 -1.6    1007.5457/ 1007.5427 3.0 RSZZG 36 9.15  beads ginseng saponins F1 C 48 H 82 O 19 /985.5319 985.5348 -2.9    1007.5457/ 1007.5427 3.0 RSZZG 37 9.26  notoginsenoside R3 C 48 H 82 O 19 /985.5339 985.5348 -0.9    1007.5459/ 1007.5427 3.2 RSZZG 38 9.35  unidentified  /951.4901      973.5042/ 39 9.52  unidentified  /538.2797   514.2904   /1029.5789 40 9.64  ginsenoside Rf C 42 H 72 O 14 801.4985/ 801.5000 -1.9    845.4923/ 845.4899 2.8 RSZZG /823.4802 823.4820 -2.2 41 9.72  bufotalin C 26 H 36 O 6 445.2588/ 445.2590 -0.4    489.2489/ 489.2488 0.2 CS 42 9.93  notoginsenoside R2 C 41 H 70 O 13 /793.4705 793.4714 -1.1    815.4818/ 815.4793 2.5 RSZZG 43 10.07  ginsenoside F3 C 41 H 70 O 13 /793.4700 793.4714 -1.8    815.4820/ 815.4793 3.3 RSZZG 44 10.10  ginsenoside Rc C 53 H 90 O 22 /1101.5831 1101.5821 0.9    1123.5947/ 1123.5900 4.2 RSZZG 45 10.20  ginsenoside Rg2 C 42 H 72 O 13 /807.4908 807.4871 4.3    829.4968/ 829.4949 2.3 RSZZG 46 10.31  ginsenoside Rb2 C 53 H 90 O 22 /1101.5798 1101.5821 -2.1    1123.5952/ 1123.5900 4.6 RSZZG 47 10.38  ginsenoside Rb3 C 53 H 90 O 22 /1101.5797 1101.5821 -2.2    1123.5940/ 1123.5900 3.6 RSZZG 48 10.49  unidentified  466.3162/   464.3032 49 10.75  20S-ginsenoside F1 C 36 H 62 O 9 /661.4288 661.4292 -0.6    683.4393/ 683.4370 3.4 RSZZG 50 10.73  bufalin C 24 H 34 O 4 387.2531/ 387.2535 -1.0       CS 51 10.86  unidentified  /969.5361 969.5399 -3.9    991.5539/ 991.5478 6.2 52 10.99  unidentified  503.3368/   501.3224 53 11.27  ginsenoside Rd C 48 H 82 O 18 /969.5374 969.5399 -2.6    991.5509/ 991.5478 3.1 RSZZG 54 11.61  gypenoside IX C 47 H 80 O 17 /939.5284 939.5293 -1.0    961.5390/ 961.5372 1.9 RSZZG 55 11.68  resibufogenin C 2 4 H 3 2 O 4 385.2385/ 385.2379 1.6       CS 56 11.71  cinobufagin C 26 H 34 O 6 443.2435/ 443.2434 0.2       CS 57 11.79  cholic acid C 24 H 40 O 5 /431.2778 431.2773 1.2 407.2803 407.2797 1.5 453.2857/ 453.2852 1.1 RGNH /815.5698 815.5673 3.1 58 12.03  ursodeoxycholic acid C 24 H 40 O 4    391.2851 391.2848 0.8 437.2902/ 437.2903 1.4 RGNH /783.5796 783.5775 2.6 /783.5778 783.5775 0.4 59 12.41  1-oxo tanshinone IIA C 19 H 16 O 4 309.1134/ 309.1127 2.3       DS 60 12.59  ginsenoside Rk1 C 42 H 70 O 12 /789.4742 789.4765 -2.9    811.4871/ 811.4844 3.3 RSZZG 61 12.66  20S-ginsenoside F2 C 42 H 72 O 13 /807.4860 807.4871 -1.4    829.4964/ 829.4949 1.8 RSZZG 62 12.89  neotanshinone D C 21 H 20 O 4 337.1431/ 337.1440 -2.7       DS 63 13.25  dihydrotanshinone C 18 H 14 O 3 279.1033/ 279.1021 4.3       DS /301.0849 301.0841 2.7 64 13.52  20R-ginsenoside Rg3 C 42 H 72 O 13 /807.4858 807.4871 -2.1    829.4963/ 829.4949 1.7 RSZZG 65 13.71  20S-ginsenoside Rg3  /807.4852 807.4871 -2.4    829.4968/ 829.4949 2.3 RSZZG 66 13.76  tetrahydro-tanshinone I C 18 H 16 O 3 281.1189/ 281.1178 3.9       DS /303.1004 303.0997 2.3 67 13.85  hyodeoxycholic acid C 24 H 40 O 4    391.2852 391.2848 1.0 437.2903/ 437.2903 0.0 RGNH /783.5792 783.5775 2.2 68 13.92  unidentified  503.3368/   501.3222   /1003.6544 69 13.98  methyl tanshinonate C 20 H 18 O 5 339.1240/ 339.1232 2.4       DS /361.1054 361.1052 1.4 70 14.15  chenodeoxycholic acid C 24 H 40 O 4    391.2848 391.2848 0.0 437.2901/ 437.2903 -0.5 RGNH /783.5789 783.5775 1.8 71 15.05  cryptotanshinone C 19 H 20 O 3 297.1508/ 297.1491 5.7       DS /319.1313 319.1310 0.9 72 15.62  ilexoside A/D C 42 H 70 O 12 /789.4742 789.4765 -2.9    811.4847/ 811.4844 0.4 MDQ 73 15.69 293 methylene C 18 H 14 O 3 279.1030/ 279.1021 3.2       DS tanshinquinone  /301.0848 301.0841 2.3 74 16.03  20S-ginsenoside Rh2 C 36 H 62 O 8       667.4425/ 667.4421 0.6 RSZZG 75 16.39  unidentified  496.3405/      540.3302/ 76 16.81 267 tanshinone IIA C 19 H 18 O 3 295.1361/ 295.1334 9.1       DS /317.1165 317.1154 3.5 77 17.31  miltirone C 19 H 22 O 2 283.1709/ 283.1698 3.9       DS /305.1525 305.1517 2.6 a Danshen, Huaihua, Maodongqing, Chansu, Chuanxiong, Renshen Jingye Zongzaogan, and Rengong Niuhuang are abbreviated as DS, HH, MDQ, CS, CX, RSZZG, and RGNH, respectively.Saponin Compounds. .Saponin compounds have no UV absorption, but they could be well detected in both positive and negative ionization modes. Usually, the adduct ions such as [M+Na]+ (ESI+) or [M+HCOO]- (ESI-) were detected in MS spectrum. In MS/MS spectrum, a series of fragmentation ions were observed due to the neutral loss of glucose, rhamnose, arabinose, or xylose (see Figure 4). These fragmentation rules are in accordance with the previous data [7, 8]. Totally, 20 ginsenoside saponins were identified, and they are deduced from the raw material, total ginsenoside of ginseng stems and leaves. Among the identified saponins, eight compounds (23,24,46,47,49,53,61, and74) were unambiguously identified as ginsenoside Rg1, ginsenoside Re, ginsenoside Rb2, ginsenoside Rb3, 20S-ginsenoside F1, ginsenoside Rd, 20S-ginsenoside F2, and 20S-ginsenoside Rh2. Unknown ginsenoside saponins followed the similar dissociation pathways. For the ginsenosides of protopanaxadiol, the ions atm/z 407, 425, and 443 could be found in the positive ion mode. Meanwhile the ginsenosides of protopanaxatriol showed the ions atm/z405, 423, and 441 in the positive ion mode.Figure 4
Proposed fragmentation pathway of ginsenoside Rb3.Ginsenoside Rg1 showed [M+Na]+ ion atm/z 823.4824 (C42H72O14Na) in the positive ion mode and [M+HCOO]- ion atm/z845.4895 (C43H73O16) in the negative ion mode. The fragmentation ions atm/z 621.4368 and 603.4259 were produced from the protonated ion [M+H]+ by losing glucose and the further loss of H2O. In the negative MS/MS analysis, [M-H]- atm/z799.4838 gave the characteristic ion atm/z 637.4307 [M-H-glc]-and 475.3773[M-H-2glc]-. Compounds23 and40 showed the quasimolecular ions atm/z823 [M+Na]+ and 845 [M+HCOO]- in the full mass spectrum. Compound23 has the same retention time and MS data as those of reference ginsenoside Rg1 and it was identified as ginsenoside Rg1. As for compound40, although the fragmentation ions atm/z 405, 423, or 441 could not be detected in the MS/MS spectrum, it was temporarily identified as ginsenoside Rf.Ginsenoside Re showed [M+Na]+ ion atm/z969.5427 (C48H82O18Na) in the positive ion mode and [M+HCOO]- ion atm/z991.5482 (C49H83O20) in the negative ion mode. The fragmentation ions atm/z945.5428 [M-H]-, 799.4845 [M-H-rha]-, 783.4893 [M-H-glc]-, and 637.1430 [M-H-rha-glc]- were found in MS/MS spectrum in the negative ion mode. Compound24 showed similar retention time and MS data as those of reference ginsenoside Re and it was identified as ginsenoside Re.As for reference ginsenoside Rb2, [M+Na]+ ion atm/z 1101.5868 (C53H90O22Na) in the positive ion mode and [M+HCOO]- ion atm/z 1123.5908 (C54H91O24) in the negative ion mode are shown in the full mass spectrum. The fragmentation ions atm/z 945.5425 [M-H-ara]- and 783.4889 [M-H-ara-glc]- were detected in MS2. Reference ginsenoside Rb3 (Figure 4) gave the adduct ions atm/z 1101.5844 [M+Na]+ and 1123.5903 [M+HCOO]-. The fragmentation ions atm/z 945.5430 [M-H-xyl]-, 783.4881 [M-H-xyl-glc]-, andm/z 621.4352[M-H-xyl-2glc]- were observed in MS2.Compounds44,46, and47have the same molecular formula of C53H90O22 according to the quasimolecular ions atm/z 1101[M+Na]+ and 1123 [M+HCOO]-. Compounds46 and47 were unambiguously identified as ginsenoside Rb2 and ginsenoside Rb3 by comparing the retention time and MS data as those of references. Compound44was tentatively deduced as ginsenoside Rc.20S-ginsenoside F1 gave the adduct ions atm/z 661.4300 [M+Na]+ (C36H62O9Na) and 683.4375 [M+HCOO]- (C37H63O11Na). In the negative MS/MS experiment, the fragmentation ion atm/z 475.3785 [M-H-glc]- was detected. Compound49 showed similar retention time and MS data as those of reference 20S-ginsenoside F1.Reference ginsenoside Rd showed the adduct ions atm/z 969.5379 [M+Na]+ and 991.5495 [M+HCOO]- in the full mass spectrum. The fragmentation ions atm/z783.4892 [M-H-glc]-, 621.4368 [M-H-2glc]-, and 459.3842 [M-H-3glc]- were produced by losing glucose. Compound53 was identified as ginsenoside Rd by displaying the same retention time and MS information.As for reference 20S-ginsenoside F2, it showed the quasimolecular ions atm/z 807.4890 [M+Na]+ and 829.4949 [M+HCOO]-. The deprotonated ion peak atm/z 783.4881 [M-H]- produced the fragmentation ion atm/z 621.4355 [M-H-glc]- in MS2. Compounds45,61,64, and65 gave the same adduct ions [M+Na]+ in positive MS and [M+HCOO]- in negative MS, indicating the molecular formula as C42H72O13. Compound45 was deduced as protopanaxatriol type and the latter three compounds were deduced as protopanaxadiol type on the base of the fragmentation rules described above. Among them, compound61 has similar ions in full mass spectrum and MS/MS experiment as those of reference 20S-ginsenoside F2 and was unambiguously identified as 20S-ginsenoside F2. The deprotonated ion of45 atm/z 783.4910 [M-H]- indicated the ion atm/z 475.3791 [M-H-rha-glc]-, supporting that45was ginsenoside Rg2. Compounds64 and65 displayed same MS data; however, unfortunately, MS2 information could not be detected and they were tentatively identified as 20R-ginsenoside Rg3 and 20S-ginsenoside Rg3.Reference ginsenoside Rh2 showed the ions atm/z 1245.8995 [2M+H]+, 645.4348 [M+Na]+, and 667.4437[M+HCOO]-. Compound74 was identified as 20S-ginsenoside Rh2 by comparing the retention time and MS data.Compounds35,36, and37have the same molecular formula of C48H82O19 and were tentatively characterized as 20S-glc-ginsenoside Rf, beads ginseng saponin F1, and notoginsenoside R3. They gave [M+Na]+ ions atm/z 985.5332, 985.5319, and 985.5339 in the positive ion mode and [M+HCOO]- ions atm/z 1007.5457, 1007.5457, and 1007.5459 in the negative ion mode. In their MS/MS experiments, the fragmentation ions of35 atm/z 799.4843 and 637.4273 were produced from the ion at m/z 961.5391 [M-H]- by loss of glucose unit. Similarly, the fragmentation ions of36and37 atm/z 799 and 637 were yielded. The retention order of three chromatographic peaks is determined according to the description in the literature [9].The chemical formulas of compounds42 and43are calculated as C41H70O13 based on the ions atm/z 793.4705 [M+Na]+ in the positive ion mode and 815.4818 [M+HCOO]- in the negative ion mode. Both compounds showed the fragmentation ions atm/z405, 423, or 441 indicating that they are due to protopanaxatriol type. In MS/MS analysis, the ions atm/z 637.4326 [M-H-xyl]- and 475.3794 [M-H-xyl-glc]- for compound42, as well as 637.4319 [M-H-ara]- and 475.3788 [M-H-ara-glc]- for compound43, were detected from the deprotonated ions atm/z 769.4753 [M-H]- and 769.4758 [M-H]-, respectively. Compounds42 and43 were identified as notoginsenoside R2 and ginsenoside F3.Compound54 showed the quasimolecular ions atm/z 939.5284 [M+Na]+ and 961.5390 [M+HCOO]-, indicating the molecular formula as C47H80O17. The fragmentation ions 783.4901 [M-H-xyl]- and 621.4363 [M-H-xyl-glc]- were detected, supporting that54was gypenoside IX.Compound60 showed the quasimolecular ions atm/z 789.4742 [M+Na]+ and 811.4871 [M+HCOO]- and the molecular formula was calculated as C42H70O12. In the MS/MS analysis, the deprotonated ion atm/z765.4792[M-H]- gave the ions atm/z603.4261 [M-H-glc]- and 441.3730 [M-H-2glc]-. Further loss of H2O yielded the ions atm/z423 and 405. It was identified as ginsenoside Rk1.Compound34 showed [M+Na]+ ion atm/z 1117.5740 and [M+HCOO]- ion atm/z 1139.5891, suggesting the molecule formula of C53H90O23. Besides, it showed [M-H]- ion atm/z 1093.5826 and fragment ions atm/z 961 [M-H- xyl/ara]-, 799 [M-H-xyl/ara-glc]-, and 637 [M-H-xyl/ara-2glc]-, concerning consecutive loss of 132, 294, and 456. These data were in accordance with those of floral ginsenoside P, floranotoginsenoside D, notoginsenoside FT3, or yesanchinoside H [9], but its structure was not accurately determined based on the limited information.Compound72 showed [M+Na]+ ion at m/z 789.4742 and [M+HCOO]- ion at m/z 811.4847, indicating the molecule formula as C42H70O12. Besides, the ions atm/z 603.4251 [M-H-162]- and 471.3466 [M-H-162-132]- in the MS/MS analysis suggested that the glycoside chain of72 consisted of a molecule of glucose and a molecule of arabinose or xylose. It could be one of ilexoside A or ilexoside D described in the literature [10].Flavonoids . Flavonoids always present high sensitivity in the UV spectra. They could be well detected in both positive and negative ionization modes. Rutin, which has UV λmax absorption at 255 and 353 nm, showed the protonated ion atm/z611.1656 [M+H]+ and deprotonated ion atm/z 609.1461 [M-H]- as well as the ion atm/z 1219.3008 [2M-H]-. Quercetin, with UV λmax absorption at 253 and 356 nm, displayed the deprotonated ion atm/z 301.0376 [M-H]-. Four compounds (9,10,13, and26) were determined as flavonoid derivatives due to the typical UV absorption. Especially, compound9 was one of main constituents of XXT. Compounds9 and26were unambiguously identified as rutin and quercetin based on the direct comparison of their UV spectra, and mass spectra with those of the authentic compounds. Compound10 has UV λmax absorption at 264 and 343 nm. The molecular formula was calculated as C27H30O15 by the quasimolecular ion atm/z 595.1652 [M+H]+, 617.1472 [M+Na]+, and 593.1505 [M-H]−. Other fragment ions atm/z 449.1083 [M+H-rha]+ and 287.1055 [M+H-rha-glc]+ were detected. Therefore, compound10was identified as kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside. Compound13 has UV λmax absorption at 252 and 339 nm. The molecular formula was calculated as C28H32O16 by the quasimolecular ion atm/z 625.1754 [M+H]+, 647.1578 [M+Na]+, and 623.1616 [M-H]−, suggesting it was isorhamnetin 3-O-rutinoside [11].Phenolic acids. Phenolic acids are the main constituents of XXT. This category of compounds was primarily derived from the ingredient herb,Salviae miltiorrhizae radix et rhizoma andHairy holly root. In this study, 14 phenolic acids were found, among which 10 compounds (1,2,4,5,7,11,14,15,16, and22) were identified as danshensu, neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, protocatechuic aldehyde, caffeic acid, isochlorogenic acid A, isochlorogenic acid B, isochlorogenic acid C, rosmarinic acid, and salvianolic acid B by using reference substances. Other compounds (12,17,18, and32) were tentatively characterized by comparing UV absorption, retention time, molecular formula, and mass fragmentation pathways [12–14].Danshensu has UVλmax absorption at 279 nm and retention time at 1.03 min. It showed the precursor ion atm/z 197.0443 and the molecular formula was calculated as C9H10O5. In the full mass spectrum, the [2M-H]- ion atm/z 395.07949 was found. The MS/MS spectrum of [M-H]- exhibited an obvious fragment ion, [M-H-H2O]- atm/z179.0338, and further loss of COOH obtained ion atm/z135.0438. Compound1 was identified as danshensu.Neochlorogenic acid has UVλmax absorption at 323 nm. In the full mass spectrum, the deprotonated ion atm/z 353.0869 [M-H]- was found. The MS/MS spectrum of [M-H]- showed ions atm/z 191.0548, 179.0336, and 135.0438. Compound2 was identified as neochlorogenic acid.Chlorogenic acid has UVλmax absorption at 325 nm and showed the quasimolecular ion atm/z353.0872 [M-H]- and 707.1482 [2M-H]-. The fragment ion atm/z 191.0553 was yielded by losing C9H6O3. Compound4was identified as chlorogenic acid.Protocatechuic aldehyde has UVλmax absorption at 229, 278, and 310 nm. The [M-H]- ion atm/z 137.0236 was detected. In the MS/MS analysis, the ion atm/z 108.0204 was yielded by losing CHO and further losing oxygen produced from the ion atm/z 92.0256. Compound5 was identified as protocatechuic aldehyde.Caffeic acid has UVλmax absorption at 238 and 322 nm. It showed [M-H]- ion atm/z 179.0339 in the full mass spectrum and the ion atm/z135.0438 by losing CO2 in the MS/MS experiment. Compound7 was identified as caffeic acid.The parent ions of three compounds (11,14, and15) atm/z515 [M-H]- and 517 [M+H]+ were easily located in the chromatogram of XXT, suggesting the molecular formula of C25H24O12. They were assigned as dicaffeoylquinic acids by comparison with retention times. Besides, they gave the same fragment ions with those of chlorogenic acid, such as m/z 191, 179, 173, and 135. in MS/MS experiments. The fragmentation pathways are in accordance with those described in the literature [15]. Therefore, compounds11,14, and15were isochlorogenic acid B, A, and C.Rosmarinic acid included a caffeic acid moiety and a molecule of danshensu. It showed [M-H]- ion atm/z359.0759. The fragment ions atm/z 197.040 and 179.0332 were yielded by losing caffeic acid or danshensu moiety in MS2. Besides, the ion atm/z161.0231 was yielded by further loss of H2O. Compound16 was identified as rosmarinic acid.Salvianolic acid B showed [M-H]- ion atm/z 717.1464. Besides, the fragment ions atm/z 519.0934 ([M-H-C9H10O5]-), 339.0504, and 321.0392 were detected in the MS/MS analysis. The characteristic fragmentation pathway of losing C9H10O5 is in accordance with those described in the literature [16]. Based on the retention time and the mass fragmentation pathway, compound22was identified as salvianolic acid B.Compound12 has UV λmax absorption at 244 and 327 nm. The molecular formula was calculated as C27H22O12 on the basis of the quasimolecular ions atm/z 539.1149 [M+H]+ and 537.1031 [M-H]-. In the MS/MS experiment, it indicated the characteristic ion atm/z 339.0500 [M-H-C9H10O5]-, supporting that compound12 was salvianolic acid H.Compound17 has UV λmax absorption at 250 and 306 nm. It showed the ion atm/z341.0666 [M+H]+. In the MS/MS analysis, the ions atm/z295.0617 and 279.0659 were yielded by losing CH2O2 and CH2O3. Compound17 was identified as salvianolic acid G.Compound18 has UV λmax absorption at 251 and 317 nm. It showed [M-H]- ion atm/z 493.1134 and the molecular formula was calculated as C26H22O10. In the MS/MS analysis, the fragment ion atm/z 295.0604 [M-H-C9H10O5]- was detected, suggesting compound18was salvianolic acid A.Compound32 showed the ions atm/z567.1498 [M+H]+, 589.1320 [M+Na]+, and 565.1342 [M-H]- in MS spectrum, revealing molecular formula of C29H26O12. Besides, fragment ion atm/z369.0971 [M-H-C9H10O5]- was observed. Compound32was identified as ethyl lithospermate.Bufadienolides. The MS/MS behaviors of bufadienolides have been extensively described [17, 18]. Briefly, for bufadienolides with only hydroxyl substituents, the fragmentation was characterized by successive eliminations of H2O and CO molecules, and the profile of MS/MS product ions was correlated with the number of hydroxyl groups. If a C-16 acetoxyl group was present, the fragmentation of [M+H]+ ions was triggered by initial loss of 60 Da (HOAc). The elimination of CO was significant for bufadienolides with a 19-formyl group, and the 19-hydroxyl group could be characterized by the loss of 30 Da (HCHO). These fragmentation rules were applied to the identification of bufadienolides in XXT sample. As shown in Table 1, eight bufadienolides were screened from XXT, six of which were unambiguously identified as gamabufotalin (19), arenobufagin (25), bufotalin (41), bufalin (50), resibufogenin (55), and cinobufagin (56) by comparison with reference substances isolated from toad venom. The other two bufadienolides were tentatively identified as bufarenogin (20) and hellebrigenin (29) [18, 19]. Taking gamabufotalin as a case, the fragmentation rules of bufadienolides were explained (Figure 5). Gamabufotalin showed UV λmax absorption at 295 nm. In its full mass spectrum, [M+H]+ ion atm/z 403.2486 was found and the fragment ions atm/z 385.2366 [M+H-H2O]+, 367.2262 [M+H-2H2O]+, and 349.2169 [M+H-3H2O]+ were detected in MS2.Figure 5
Proposed fragmentation pathway of gamabufotalin.Bile acids. Bile acid derivatives are in lack of conjugated system and their UV absorption is not obvious. However, they always present high sensitivity in the negative ion mode. The deprotonated ion [M-H]- and adduct ion [M+HCOO]- were obviously detected in MS spectrum. The loss of side chain was commonly observed in MS2. Four bile acid derivatives were detected from XXT sample, two of which were unambiguously identified as ursodeoxycholic acid (58, UDCA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (70, CDCA) based on the direct comparison of reference substances. The other two compounds were tentatively identified as cholanic acid (57) and hyodeoxycholic acid (67). They are derived from the raw material, Rengong Niuhuang (Bovis calculus artifactus) [20].Ursodeoxycholic acid showed the ions atm/z391.2851 [M-H]-, 437.2916 [M+HCOO]-, and 783.5778 [2M-H]- in the negative ion mode. In the positive ion mode, the ion atm/z357.2807 [M+H-2H2O]+ was assigned as the loss of two molecules of H2O. The ion atm/z321.2587 represented its side chain loss in MS2. Compound58 was identified as UDCA.CDCA showed the ions atm/z 391.2872 [M-H]-, 437.2907[M+HCOO]-, and 783.5798 [2M-H]- in the negative ion mode. In the positive ion mode, the loss of H2O unit yielded [M+H-2H2O]+ ion atm/z357.2809. The occurrence of the ion atm/z321.2586 in MS2 was due to side chain loss. Compound70 was identified as CDCA.Compound57 showed [M+Na]+ ion atm/z431.2778 in positive mode, and [M-H]- ion atm/z 407.2803, [M+HCOO]- ion atm/z453.2857, and [2M-H]- ion atm/z815.5698 in the negative mode. The ions representing a series of H2O loss was observed, such as 373.2749 [M+H-2H2O]+ and 355.2649 [M+H-3H2O]+. It was tentatively characterized as cholanic acid.Compound67showed [M-H]- ion atm/z391.2852, [M+HCOO]- ion atm/z 437.2903, and [2M-H]- atm/z783.5792 in the full mass spectrum. The molecular formula was calculated as C24H40O4. It was tentatively deduced as hyodeoxycholic acid.Quinones derivatives. Quinones derivatives are another kind of active constituents from Danshen and they were easily detected in XXT sample. Compounds63,71, and76were identified as dihydrotanshinone, cryptotanshinone, and tanshinone II A by comparison with reference substances. They displayed similar fragmentation pathways concerning successive eliminations of H2O and CO molecules. Tanshinone IIA was used as an example to illustrate the fragmentation pathway of quinones constituents as shown in Figure 6. Based on these rules as well as empirical molecular formula, 7 compounds were characterized as tanshindiol A31, 1-oxo tanshinone IIA59, neotanshinone D62, tetrahydrotanshinone I66, methyltanshinonate69, methylenetanshinquinone73, and miltirone77. [12, 16, 20, 21].Figure 6
Proposed fragmentation pathway of tanshinone IIA.Phthalide derivative. Compound21 has UV absorption at 276 nm. Its molecular formula was calculated as C12H14O3 on the basis of [M+H]+ ion atm/z 207.1024. The above data were in accordance with those of 4-hydroxyl-3-butylphthalide in the literature [22]. Compound21 was tentatively assigned as 4-hydroxyl-3-butylphthalide. It could be derived from individual herbChuanxiong rhizome [23].Among the identified compounds, most constituents were derived from the raw materials, Danshen and Renshen Jingye Zongzaogan, and a small proportion of compounds were considered from Huaihua, Maodongqing, Chuanxiong, Chansu, and Rengong Niuhuang. The other ingredients, Rengong Shexiang, Bingpian, and Shuizhi, were not characterized in the present HPLC and UPLC-QTOF/MS condition. This could be related to the prescription of raw materials and the manufacturing process employed. Usually, muscone, one of active constituents in Rengong Shexiang and borneol are detected by GC or GC-MS [3]. They are not easily detected in the liquid chromatography. Additionally, it is worth noting that no chemical information of Shuizhi, a famous traditional Chinese medicine originated from animal source, was found, although small molecule compounds with diverse structures have been reported from this drug [24]. More effort is made to explain its prescription role in XXT product.


## 3.1. Qualitative Analyses of XXT Samples by HPLC

In order to obtain better detection of XXT samples, HPLC conditions were optimized. The acetonitrile-water system displayed more powerful separation ability for the main constituents in all samples than the methanol-water system. When organic acid was added to the mobile phase, the symmetry of most chromatographic peaks was improved. Under optimized conditions, ten batches of XXT samples, together with the reference compounds, were examined and their HPLC chromatograms were shown in Figure2. High similarity in the number, type, and amount of chemical constituents was observed in the HPLC profile of each individual sample, which suggested the chemical consistency of different batches of XXT samples. The characteristic peak 4 (rutin) represents an important active component in XXT sample with a consistently high content, which was chosen as the reference peak for the calculation of the relative retention time ratio and relative peak area ratio of other common chromatographic peaks. For the validation of the assay procedure, the results of precision and repeatability were indicated by RSDs that were less than 4.9% (n=6) for seventeen peaks (Tables S1~S4). The stability test suggested that these peaks were stable in the sample solution within 24 hr (Tables S5~S6).Figure 2
HPLC profiles of Xueshuan Xinmaining Tablet samples at 251 nm (from top to bottom: Lot. 160904, 160905, 161001-161008).To identify the origin of these characteristic peaks from individual raw material, a comparative study was carried out by using various extract of raw materials and XXT samples. Considering the chromatogram recorded at the wavelength of 251 nm, main chromatographic peaks in the HPLC profile were attributed to the following five raw materials: Danshen, Huaihua, Maodongqing, Chuanxiong, and Chansu (FigureS2). The contribution of other raw materials was not manifested, either because of the absence of UV absorption of active compounds or due to the existence of no potent components at the detection condition. More information is expected to further confirm the contribution of each raw material to the general chromatographic profile of XXT sample.


## 3.2. Identification of Chemical Constituents in XXT Sample by UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS

M S E analyses in the positive ion mode and negative ion mode were selected for obtaining extensive structural information via collision-induced dissociation. For the purpose of determining the optimized CE to generate fragment ions for structural elucidation and characterization, MS/MS experiments at different CE values were performed. Under optimized parameters, the total ion chromatogram of XXT samples are shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
TICs of Xueshuan Xinmaining Tablet in the negative and positive modes.The fragmentation behaviors of reference compounds were investigated, and these rules were applied for the structural elucidation of their derivatives with the same basic skeleton. A total of 63 compounds in XXT sample were detected and tentatively characterized by comparing the retention times, MS fragmentation behavior, and literature information. Among these compounds, there were twenty saponins, fifteen phenolic acids, ten quinones, eight steroids, four bile acids, four flavonoids, one amino acid, and one lactone. Their chemical structures are provided in Figure1. For better understanding of the fragmentation behavior, 63 compounds were divided into several groups and deduced as follows. The chromatographic and mass data of the identified constituents were summarized in Table 1.Table 1
Retention time (tR), UV, and MS data of the identified compounds in XXT samples.
No. t R/min UV Identified compounds Formula [M+H]+/[M+Na]+ Calc.mass Δppm [M-H]- Calc.mass Δppm [M+HCOO]-/[2M-H]- Calc.mass Δppm Sourcea λ m a x/nm 1 1.03 282 danshensu C 9 H 10 O 5    197.0446 197.0450 -2.5 /395.0974 395.0978 -1.0 DS 2 1.22 295 neochlorogenic acid C 16 H 18 O 9    353.0869 353.0873 -1.1    DS/MDQ 3 1.59  suberyl arginine C 14 H 26 O 5 N 4 331.1977/ 331.1981 -1.2 329.1819 329.1825 -1.8    CS 4 1.83 320 chlorogenic acid C 16 H 18 O 9 355.1026/ 355.1029 -0.8 353.0876 353.0873 0.8 /707.1840 707.1823 2.4 DS/MDQ 5 1.83 220, 318 protocatechuic aldehyde C 7 H 6 O 3    137.0235/ 137.0239 -2.9    DS 6 1.99 233 cryptochlorogenic acid  /377.0854   353.0871      DS/MDQ 7 2.28 232, 318 caffeic acid C 9 H 8 O 4    179.0341 179.0344 -1.7    DS 8 3.41 244, 329 unidentified  /465.1384   441.1395 9 3.68 254, 352 rutin C 27 H 30 O 16 611.1618/ 611.1612 1.0 609.1458 609.1456 0.3 /1219.3020 1219.2989 2.5 HH 10 4.31 264, 343 kaempferol-3-O- C 27 H 30 O 15 595.1652/ 595.1663 -1.8 593.1505 593.1506 -0.1    HH rutinoside  /617.1472 617.1482 -1.6 11 4.35 244, 327 isochlorogenic acid B C 25 H 24 O 12 517.1331/ 517.1346 -2.9 515.1188 515.1190 -0.4    DS/MDQ /539.1177 539.1165 2.2 12 4.39 244, 327 salvianolic acid H C 27 H 22 O 12 539.1149/ 539.1190 -7.6 537.1031 537.1033 -0.4    DS 13 4.42 252, 339 isorhamnetin 3-O-rutinoside C 28 H 32 O 16 625.1754/ 625.1769 -2.4 623.1616 623.1612 0.6    HH /647.1578 647.1588 -1.5 14 4.50 329 isochlorogenic acid A C 25 H 24 O 12 /539.1154 539.1165 -2.0 515.1193 515.1190 0.6    DS/MDQ 15 4.90 244, 326 isochlorogenic acid C C 25 H 24 O 12 517.1359/ 517.1346 2.5 515.1192 515.1190 0.4    DS/MDQ /539.1176 539.1165 2.0 16 5.02 244, 329 rosmarinic acid C 18 H 16 O 8    359.0766 359.0767 -0.3 /719.1610 719.1612 -0.3 DS 17 5.13 250, 306 salvianolic acid G C 18 H 12 O 7 341.0666/ 341.0661 1.5       DS 18 5.17 251, 317 salvianolic acid A C 26 H 22 O 10    493.1134 493.1135 0.2    DS 19 5.28  gamabufotalin C 24 H 34 O 5 403.2483/ 403.2484 -0.2    447.2381/ 447.2383 -0.4 CS 20 5.32  bufarenogin C 24 H 32 O 6 417.2273/ 417.2277 -1.0       CS 21 5.43 276 4-hydroxyl-3-butylphthalide C 12 H 14 O 3 207.1024/ 207.1021 1.4       CX 22 5.53 232 salvianolic acid B C 36 H 30 O 16    717.1475 717.1456 2.6    DS 23 6.17  ginsenoside Rg1 C 42 H 72 O 14 /823.4792 823.4820 -3.4    845.4905/ 845.4899 0.7 RSZZG 24 6.24  ginsenoside Re C 48 H 82 O 18 /969.5378 969.5399 -2.2 945.5450 945.5423 2.9 991.5548/ 991.5478 7.1 RSZZG 25 6.44  arenobufagin C 24 H 32 O 6 417.2271/ 417.2277 -1.4 415.2111 415.2121 -2.4 461.2168/ 461.2175 -1.5 CS 26 6.45  quercetin C 15 H 10 O 7 303.0506/ 303.0505 0.3 301.0346 301.0348 -0.7    HH 27 6.71  unidentified  765.2371 28 6.99  unidentified  /677.4221      699.4323/ 29 7.17 245, 328 hellebrigenin C 24 H 32 O 6 417.2274 417.2277 -0.7    461.2173/ 461.2175  CS 30 7.25  unidentified     677.1508 31 7.49  tanshindiol A C 18 H 16 O 5 313.1079/ 313.1076 1.0       DS /335.0901 335.0895 1.8 32 8.14  ethyl lithospermate C 29 H 26 O 12 567.1498/ 567.1503 -0.9 565.1342 565.1346 -0.1    DS /589.1320 589.1322 -0.3 33 8.49  unidentified  /755.1589   731.1622 34 8.65  unidentified  /1117.5740      1139.5891/ 35 9.01  20S-glc-ginsenoside Rf C 48 H 82 O 19 /985.5332 985.5348 -1.6    1007.5457/ 1007.5427 3.0 RSZZG 36 9.15  beads ginseng saponins F1 C 48 H 82 O 19 /985.5319 985.5348 -2.9    1007.5457/ 1007.5427 3.0 RSZZG 37 9.26  notoginsenoside R3 C 48 H 82 O 19 /985.5339 985.5348 -0.9    1007.5459/ 1007.5427 3.2 RSZZG 38 9.35  unidentified  /951.4901      973.5042/ 39 9.52  unidentified  /538.2797   514.2904   /1029.5789 40 9.64  ginsenoside Rf C 42 H 72 O 14 801.4985/ 801.5000 -1.9    845.4923/ 845.4899 2.8 RSZZG /823.4802 823.4820 -2.2 41 9.72  bufotalin C 26 H 36 O 6 445.2588/ 445.2590 -0.4    489.2489/ 489.2488 0.2 CS 42 9.93  notoginsenoside R2 C 41 H 70 O 13 /793.4705 793.4714 -1.1    815.4818/ 815.4793 2.5 RSZZG 43 10.07  ginsenoside F3 C 41 H 70 O 13 /793.4700 793.4714 -1.8    815.4820/ 815.4793 3.3 RSZZG 44 10.10  ginsenoside Rc C 53 H 90 O 22 /1101.5831 1101.5821 0.9    1123.5947/ 1123.5900 4.2 RSZZG 45 10.20  ginsenoside Rg2 C 42 H 72 O 13 /807.4908 807.4871 4.3    829.4968/ 829.4949 2.3 RSZZG 46 10.31  ginsenoside Rb2 C 53 H 90 O 22 /1101.5798 1101.5821 -2.1    1123.5952/ 1123.5900 4.6 RSZZG 47 10.38  ginsenoside Rb3 C 53 H 90 O 22 /1101.5797 1101.5821 -2.2    1123.5940/ 1123.5900 3.6 RSZZG 48 10.49  unidentified  466.3162/   464.3032 49 10.75  20S-ginsenoside F1 C 36 H 62 O 9 /661.4288 661.4292 -0.6    683.4393/ 683.4370 3.4 RSZZG 50 10.73  bufalin C 24 H 34 O 4 387.2531/ 387.2535 -1.0       CS 51 10.86  unidentified  /969.5361 969.5399 -3.9    991.5539/ 991.5478 6.2 52 10.99  unidentified  503.3368/   501.3224 53 11.27  ginsenoside Rd C 48 H 82 O 18 /969.5374 969.5399 -2.6    991.5509/ 991.5478 3.1 RSZZG 54 11.61  gypenoside IX C 47 H 80 O 17 /939.5284 939.5293 -1.0    961.5390/ 961.5372 1.9 RSZZG 55 11.68  resibufogenin C 2 4 H 3 2 O 4 385.2385/ 385.2379 1.6       CS 56 11.71  cinobufagin C 26 H 34 O 6 443.2435/ 443.2434 0.2       CS 57 11.79  cholic acid C 24 H 40 O 5 /431.2778 431.2773 1.2 407.2803 407.2797 1.5 453.2857/ 453.2852 1.1 RGNH /815.5698 815.5673 3.1 58 12.03  ursodeoxycholic acid C 24 H 40 O 4    391.2851 391.2848 0.8 437.2902/ 437.2903 1.4 RGNH /783.5796 783.5775 2.6 /783.5778 783.5775 0.4 59 12.41  1-oxo tanshinone IIA C 19 H 16 O 4 309.1134/ 309.1127 2.3       DS 60 12.59  ginsenoside Rk1 C 42 H 70 O 12 /789.4742 789.4765 -2.9    811.4871/ 811.4844 3.3 RSZZG 61 12.66  20S-ginsenoside F2 C 42 H 72 O 13 /807.4860 807.4871 -1.4    829.4964/ 829.4949 1.8 RSZZG 62 12.89  neotanshinone D C 21 H 20 O 4 337.1431/ 337.1440 -2.7       DS 63 13.25  dihydrotanshinone C 18 H 14 O 3 279.1033/ 279.1021 4.3       DS /301.0849 301.0841 2.7 64 13.52  20R-ginsenoside Rg3 C 42 H 72 O 13 /807.4858 807.4871 -2.1    829.4963/ 829.4949 1.7 RSZZG 65 13.71  20S-ginsenoside Rg3  /807.4852 807.4871 -2.4    829.4968/ 829.4949 2.3 RSZZG 66 13.76  tetrahydro-tanshinone I C 18 H 16 O 3 281.1189/ 281.1178 3.9       DS /303.1004 303.0997 2.3 67 13.85  hyodeoxycholic acid C 24 H 40 O 4    391.2852 391.2848 1.0 437.2903/ 437.2903 0.0 RGNH /783.5792 783.5775 2.2 68 13.92  unidentified  503.3368/   501.3222   /1003.6544 69 13.98  methyl tanshinonate C 20 H 18 O 5 339.1240/ 339.1232 2.4       DS /361.1054 361.1052 1.4 70 14.15  chenodeoxycholic acid C 24 H 40 O 4    391.2848 391.2848 0.0 437.2901/ 437.2903 -0.5 RGNH /783.5789 783.5775 1.8 71 15.05  cryptotanshinone C 19 H 20 O 3 297.1508/ 297.1491 5.7       DS /319.1313 319.1310 0.9 72 15.62  ilexoside A/D C 42 H 70 O 12 /789.4742 789.4765 -2.9    811.4847/ 811.4844 0.4 MDQ 73 15.69 293 methylene C 18 H 14 O 3 279.1030/ 279.1021 3.2       DS tanshinquinone  /301.0848 301.0841 2.3 74 16.03  20S-ginsenoside Rh2 C 36 H 62 O 8       667.4425/ 667.4421 0.6 RSZZG 75 16.39  unidentified  496.3405/      540.3302/ 76 16.81 267 tanshinone IIA C 19 H 18 O 3 295.1361/ 295.1334 9.1       DS /317.1165 317.1154 3.5 77 17.31  miltirone C 19 H 22 O 2 283.1709/ 283.1698 3.9       DS /305.1525 305.1517 2.6 a Danshen, Huaihua, Maodongqing, Chansu, Chuanxiong, Renshen Jingye Zongzaogan, and Rengong Niuhuang are abbreviated as DS, HH, MDQ, CS, CX, RSZZG, and RGNH, respectively.Saponin Compounds. .Saponin compounds have no UV absorption, but they could be well detected in both positive and negative ionization modes. Usually, the adduct ions such as [M+Na]+ (ESI+) or [M+HCOO]- (ESI-) were detected in MS spectrum. In MS/MS spectrum, a series of fragmentation ions were observed due to the neutral loss of glucose, rhamnose, arabinose, or xylose (see Figure 4). These fragmentation rules are in accordance with the previous data [7, 8]. Totally, 20 ginsenoside saponins were identified, and they are deduced from the raw material, total ginsenoside of ginseng stems and leaves. Among the identified saponins, eight compounds (23,24,46,47,49,53,61, and74) were unambiguously identified as ginsenoside Rg1, ginsenoside Re, ginsenoside Rb2, ginsenoside Rb3, 20S-ginsenoside F1, ginsenoside Rd, 20S-ginsenoside F2, and 20S-ginsenoside Rh2. Unknown ginsenoside saponins followed the similar dissociation pathways. For the ginsenosides of protopanaxadiol, the ions atm/z 407, 425, and 443 could be found in the positive ion mode. Meanwhile the ginsenosides of protopanaxatriol showed the ions atm/z405, 423, and 441 in the positive ion mode.Figure 4
Proposed fragmentation pathway of ginsenoside Rb3.Ginsenoside Rg1 showed [M+Na]+ ion atm/z 823.4824 (C42H72O14Na) in the positive ion mode and [M+HCOO]- ion atm/z845.4895 (C43H73O16) in the negative ion mode. The fragmentation ions atm/z 621.4368 and 603.4259 were produced from the protonated ion [M+H]+ by losing glucose and the further loss of H2O. In the negative MS/MS analysis, [M-H]- atm/z799.4838 gave the characteristic ion atm/z 637.4307 [M-H-glc]-and 475.3773[M-H-2glc]-. Compounds23 and40 showed the quasimolecular ions atm/z823 [M+Na]+ and 845 [M+HCOO]- in the full mass spectrum. Compound23 has the same retention time and MS data as those of reference ginsenoside Rg1 and it was identified as ginsenoside Rg1. As for compound40, although the fragmentation ions atm/z 405, 423, or 441 could not be detected in the MS/MS spectrum, it was temporarily identified as ginsenoside Rf.Ginsenoside Re showed [M+Na]+ ion atm/z969.5427 (C48H82O18Na) in the positive ion mode and [M+HCOO]- ion atm/z991.5482 (C49H83O20) in the negative ion mode. The fragmentation ions atm/z945.5428 [M-H]-, 799.4845 [M-H-rha]-, 783.4893 [M-H-glc]-, and 637.1430 [M-H-rha-glc]- were found in MS/MS spectrum in the negative ion mode. Compound24 showed similar retention time and MS data as those of reference ginsenoside Re and it was identified as ginsenoside Re.As for reference ginsenoside Rb2, [M+Na]+ ion atm/z 1101.5868 (C53H90O22Na) in the positive ion mode and [M+HCOO]- ion atm/z 1123.5908 (C54H91O24) in the negative ion mode are shown in the full mass spectrum. The fragmentation ions atm/z 945.5425 [M-H-ara]- and 783.4889 [M-H-ara-glc]- were detected in MS2. Reference ginsenoside Rb3 (Figure 4) gave the adduct ions atm/z 1101.5844 [M+Na]+ and 1123.5903 [M+HCOO]-. The fragmentation ions atm/z 945.5430 [M-H-xyl]-, 783.4881 [M-H-xyl-glc]-, andm/z 621.4352[M-H-xyl-2glc]- were observed in MS2.Compounds44,46, and47have the same molecular formula of C53H90O22 according to the quasimolecular ions atm/z 1101[M+Na]+ and 1123 [M+HCOO]-. Compounds46 and47 were unambiguously identified as ginsenoside Rb2 and ginsenoside Rb3 by comparing the retention time and MS data as those of references. Compound44was tentatively deduced as ginsenoside Rc.20S-ginsenoside F1 gave the adduct ions atm/z 661.4300 [M+Na]+ (C36H62O9Na) and 683.4375 [M+HCOO]- (C37H63O11Na). In the negative MS/MS experiment, the fragmentation ion atm/z 475.3785 [M-H-glc]- was detected. Compound49 showed similar retention time and MS data as those of reference 20S-ginsenoside F1.Reference ginsenoside Rd showed the adduct ions atm/z 969.5379 [M+Na]+ and 991.5495 [M+HCOO]- in the full mass spectrum. The fragmentation ions atm/z783.4892 [M-H-glc]-, 621.4368 [M-H-2glc]-, and 459.3842 [M-H-3glc]- were produced by losing glucose. Compound53 was identified as ginsenoside Rd by displaying the same retention time and MS information.As for reference 20S-ginsenoside F2, it showed the quasimolecular ions atm/z 807.4890 [M+Na]+ and 829.4949 [M+HCOO]-. The deprotonated ion peak atm/z 783.4881 [M-H]- produced the fragmentation ion atm/z 621.4355 [M-H-glc]- in MS2. Compounds45,61,64, and65 gave the same adduct ions [M+Na]+ in positive MS and [M+HCOO]- in negative MS, indicating the molecular formula as C42H72O13. Compound45 was deduced as protopanaxatriol type and the latter three compounds were deduced as protopanaxadiol type on the base of the fragmentation rules described above. Among them, compound61 has similar ions in full mass spectrum and MS/MS experiment as those of reference 20S-ginsenoside F2 and was unambiguously identified as 20S-ginsenoside F2. The deprotonated ion of45 atm/z 783.4910 [M-H]- indicated the ion atm/z 475.3791 [M-H-rha-glc]-, supporting that45was ginsenoside Rg2. Compounds64 and65 displayed same MS data; however, unfortunately, MS2 information could not be detected and they were tentatively identified as 20R-ginsenoside Rg3 and 20S-ginsenoside Rg3.Reference ginsenoside Rh2 showed the ions atm/z 1245.8995 [2M+H]+, 645.4348 [M+Na]+, and 667.4437[M+HCOO]-. Compound74 was identified as 20S-ginsenoside Rh2 by comparing the retention time and MS data.Compounds35,36, and37have the same molecular formula of C48H82O19 and were tentatively characterized as 20S-glc-ginsenoside Rf, beads ginseng saponin F1, and notoginsenoside R3. They gave [M+Na]+ ions atm/z 985.5332, 985.5319, and 985.5339 in the positive ion mode and [M+HCOO]- ions atm/z 1007.5457, 1007.5457, and 1007.5459 in the negative ion mode. In their MS/MS experiments, the fragmentation ions of35 atm/z 799.4843 and 637.4273 were produced from the ion at m/z 961.5391 [M-H]- by loss of glucose unit. Similarly, the fragmentation ions of36and37 atm/z 799 and 637 were yielded. The retention order of three chromatographic peaks is determined according to the description in the literature [9].The chemical formulas of compounds42 and43are calculated as C41H70O13 based on the ions atm/z 793.4705 [M+Na]+ in the positive ion mode and 815.4818 [M+HCOO]- in the negative ion mode. Both compounds showed the fragmentation ions atm/z405, 423, or 441 indicating that they are due to protopanaxatriol type. In MS/MS analysis, the ions atm/z 637.4326 [M-H-xyl]- and 475.3794 [M-H-xyl-glc]- for compound42, as well as 637.4319 [M-H-ara]- and 475.3788 [M-H-ara-glc]- for compound43, were detected from the deprotonated ions atm/z 769.4753 [M-H]- and 769.4758 [M-H]-, respectively. Compounds42 and43 were identified as notoginsenoside R2 and ginsenoside F3.Compound54 showed the quasimolecular ions atm/z 939.5284 [M+Na]+ and 961.5390 [M+HCOO]-, indicating the molecular formula as C47H80O17. The fragmentation ions 783.4901 [M-H-xyl]- and 621.4363 [M-H-xyl-glc]- were detected, supporting that54was gypenoside IX.Compound60 showed the quasimolecular ions atm/z 789.4742 [M+Na]+ and 811.4871 [M+HCOO]- and the molecular formula was calculated as C42H70O12. In the MS/MS analysis, the deprotonated ion atm/z765.4792[M-H]- gave the ions atm/z603.4261 [M-H-glc]- and 441.3730 [M-H-2glc]-. Further loss of H2O yielded the ions atm/z423 and 405. It was identified as ginsenoside Rk1.Compound34 showed [M+Na]+ ion atm/z 1117.5740 and [M+HCOO]- ion atm/z 1139.5891, suggesting the molecule formula of C53H90O23. Besides, it showed [M-H]- ion atm/z 1093.5826 and fragment ions atm/z 961 [M-H- xyl/ara]-, 799 [M-H-xyl/ara-glc]-, and 637 [M-H-xyl/ara-2glc]-, concerning consecutive loss of 132, 294, and 456. These data were in accordance with those of floral ginsenoside P, floranotoginsenoside D, notoginsenoside FT3, or yesanchinoside H [9], but its structure was not accurately determined based on the limited information.Compound72 showed [M+Na]+ ion at m/z 789.4742 and [M+HCOO]- ion at m/z 811.4847, indicating the molecule formula as C42H70O12. Besides, the ions atm/z 603.4251 [M-H-162]- and 471.3466 [M-H-162-132]- in the MS/MS analysis suggested that the glycoside chain of72 consisted of a molecule of glucose and a molecule of arabinose or xylose. It could be one of ilexoside A or ilexoside D described in the literature [10].Flavonoids . Flavonoids always present high sensitivity in the UV spectra. They could be well detected in both positive and negative ionization modes. Rutin, which has UV λmax absorption at 255 and 353 nm, showed the protonated ion atm/z611.1656 [M+H]+ and deprotonated ion atm/z 609.1461 [M-H]- as well as the ion atm/z 1219.3008 [2M-H]-. Quercetin, with UV λmax absorption at 253 and 356 nm, displayed the deprotonated ion atm/z 301.0376 [M-H]-. Four compounds (9,10,13, and26) were determined as flavonoid derivatives due to the typical UV absorption. Especially, compound9 was one of main constituents of XXT. Compounds9 and26were unambiguously identified as rutin and quercetin based on the direct comparison of their UV spectra, and mass spectra with those of the authentic compounds. Compound10 has UV λmax absorption at 264 and 343 nm. The molecular formula was calculated as C27H30O15 by the quasimolecular ion atm/z 595.1652 [M+H]+, 617.1472 [M+Na]+, and 593.1505 [M-H]−. Other fragment ions atm/z 449.1083 [M+H-rha]+ and 287.1055 [M+H-rha-glc]+ were detected. Therefore, compound10was identified as kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside. Compound13 has UV λmax absorption at 252 and 339 nm. The molecular formula was calculated as C28H32O16 by the quasimolecular ion atm/z 625.1754 [M+H]+, 647.1578 [M+Na]+, and 623.1616 [M-H]−, suggesting it was isorhamnetin 3-O-rutinoside [11].Phenolic acids. Phenolic acids are the main constituents of XXT. This category of compounds was primarily derived from the ingredient herb,Salviae miltiorrhizae radix et rhizoma andHairy holly root. In this study, 14 phenolic acids were found, among which 10 compounds (1,2,4,5,7,11,14,15,16, and22) were identified as danshensu, neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, protocatechuic aldehyde, caffeic acid, isochlorogenic acid A, isochlorogenic acid B, isochlorogenic acid C, rosmarinic acid, and salvianolic acid B by using reference substances. Other compounds (12,17,18, and32) were tentatively characterized by comparing UV absorption, retention time, molecular formula, and mass fragmentation pathways [12–14].Danshensu has UVλmax absorption at 279 nm and retention time at 1.03 min. It showed the precursor ion atm/z 197.0443 and the molecular formula was calculated as C9H10O5. In the full mass spectrum, the [2M-H]- ion atm/z 395.07949 was found. The MS/MS spectrum of [M-H]- exhibited an obvious fragment ion, [M-H-H2O]- atm/z179.0338, and further loss of COOH obtained ion atm/z135.0438. Compound1 was identified as danshensu.Neochlorogenic acid has UVλmax absorption at 323 nm. In the full mass spectrum, the deprotonated ion atm/z 353.0869 [M-H]- was found. The MS/MS spectrum of [M-H]- showed ions atm/z 191.0548, 179.0336, and 135.0438. Compound2 was identified as neochlorogenic acid.Chlorogenic acid has UVλmax absorption at 325 nm and showed the quasimolecular ion atm/z353.0872 [M-H]- and 707.1482 [2M-H]-. The fragment ion atm/z 191.0553 was yielded by losing C9H6O3. Compound4was identified as chlorogenic acid.Protocatechuic aldehyde has UVλmax absorption at 229, 278, and 310 nm. The [M-H]- ion atm/z 137.0236 was detected. In the MS/MS analysis, the ion atm/z 108.0204 was yielded by losing CHO and further losing oxygen produced from the ion atm/z 92.0256. Compound5 was identified as protocatechuic aldehyde.Caffeic acid has UVλmax absorption at 238 and 322 nm. It showed [M-H]- ion atm/z 179.0339 in the full mass spectrum and the ion atm/z135.0438 by losing CO2 in the MS/MS experiment. Compound7 was identified as caffeic acid.The parent ions of three compounds (11,14, and15) atm/z515 [M-H]- and 517 [M+H]+ were easily located in the chromatogram of XXT, suggesting the molecular formula of C25H24O12. They were assigned as dicaffeoylquinic acids by comparison with retention times. Besides, they gave the same fragment ions with those of chlorogenic acid, such as m/z 191, 179, 173, and 135. in MS/MS experiments. The fragmentation pathways are in accordance with those described in the literature [15]. Therefore, compounds11,14, and15were isochlorogenic acid B, A, and C.Rosmarinic acid included a caffeic acid moiety and a molecule of danshensu. It showed [M-H]- ion atm/z359.0759. The fragment ions atm/z 197.040 and 179.0332 were yielded by losing caffeic acid or danshensu moiety in MS2. Besides, the ion atm/z161.0231 was yielded by further loss of H2O. Compound16 was identified as rosmarinic acid.Salvianolic acid B showed [M-H]- ion atm/z 717.1464. Besides, the fragment ions atm/z 519.0934 ([M-H-C9H10O5]-), 339.0504, and 321.0392 were detected in the MS/MS analysis. The characteristic fragmentation pathway of losing C9H10O5 is in accordance with those described in the literature [16]. Based on the retention time and the mass fragmentation pathway, compound22was identified as salvianolic acid B.Compound12 has UV λmax absorption at 244 and 327 nm. The molecular formula was calculated as C27H22O12 on the basis of the quasimolecular ions atm/z 539.1149 [M+H]+ and 537.1031 [M-H]-. In the MS/MS experiment, it indicated the characteristic ion atm/z 339.0500 [M-H-C9H10O5]-, supporting that compound12 was salvianolic acid H.Compound17 has UV λmax absorption at 250 and 306 nm. It showed the ion atm/z341.0666 [M+H]+. In the MS/MS analysis, the ions atm/z295.0617 and 279.0659 were yielded by losing CH2O2 and CH2O3. Compound17 was identified as salvianolic acid G.Compound18 has UV λmax absorption at 251 and 317 nm. It showed [M-H]- ion atm/z 493.1134 and the molecular formula was calculated as C26H22O10. In the MS/MS analysis, the fragment ion atm/z 295.0604 [M-H-C9H10O5]- was detected, suggesting compound18was salvianolic acid A.Compound32 showed the ions atm/z567.1498 [M+H]+, 589.1320 [M+Na]+, and 565.1342 [M-H]- in MS spectrum, revealing molecular formula of C29H26O12. Besides, fragment ion atm/z369.0971 [M-H-C9H10O5]- was observed. Compound32was identified as ethyl lithospermate.Bufadienolides. The MS/MS behaviors of bufadienolides have been extensively described [17, 18]. Briefly, for bufadienolides with only hydroxyl substituents, the fragmentation was characterized by successive eliminations of H2O and CO molecules, and the profile of MS/MS product ions was correlated with the number of hydroxyl groups. If a C-16 acetoxyl group was present, the fragmentation of [M+H]+ ions was triggered by initial loss of 60 Da (HOAc). The elimination of CO was significant for bufadienolides with a 19-formyl group, and the 19-hydroxyl group could be characterized by the loss of 30 Da (HCHO). These fragmentation rules were applied to the identification of bufadienolides in XXT sample. As shown in Table 1, eight bufadienolides were screened from XXT, six of which were unambiguously identified as gamabufotalin (19), arenobufagin (25), bufotalin (41), bufalin (50), resibufogenin (55), and cinobufagin (56) by comparison with reference substances isolated from toad venom. The other two bufadienolides were tentatively identified as bufarenogin (20) and hellebrigenin (29) [18, 19]. Taking gamabufotalin as a case, the fragmentation rules of bufadienolides were explained (Figure 5). Gamabufotalin showed UV λmax absorption at 295 nm. In its full mass spectrum, [M+H]+ ion atm/z 403.2486 was found and the fragment ions atm/z 385.2366 [M+H-H2O]+, 367.2262 [M+H-2H2O]+, and 349.2169 [M+H-3H2O]+ were detected in MS2.Figure 5
Proposed fragmentation pathway of gamabufotalin.Bile acids. Bile acid derivatives are in lack of conjugated system and their UV absorption is not obvious. However, they always present high sensitivity in the negative ion mode. The deprotonated ion [M-H]- and adduct ion [M+HCOO]- were obviously detected in MS spectrum. The loss of side chain was commonly observed in MS2. Four bile acid derivatives were detected from XXT sample, two of which were unambiguously identified as ursodeoxycholic acid (58, UDCA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (70, CDCA) based on the direct comparison of reference substances. The other two compounds were tentatively identified as cholanic acid (57) and hyodeoxycholic acid (67). They are derived from the raw material, Rengong Niuhuang (Bovis calculus artifactus) [20].Ursodeoxycholic acid showed the ions atm/z391.2851 [M-H]-, 437.2916 [M+HCOO]-, and 783.5778 [2M-H]- in the negative ion mode. In the positive ion mode, the ion atm/z357.2807 [M+H-2H2O]+ was assigned as the loss of two molecules of H2O. The ion atm/z321.2587 represented its side chain loss in MS2. Compound58 was identified as UDCA.CDCA showed the ions atm/z 391.2872 [M-H]-, 437.2907[M+HCOO]-, and 783.5798 [2M-H]- in the negative ion mode. In the positive ion mode, the loss of H2O unit yielded [M+H-2H2O]+ ion atm/z357.2809. The occurrence of the ion atm/z321.2586 in MS2 was due to side chain loss. Compound70 was identified as CDCA.Compound57 showed [M+Na]+ ion atm/z431.2778 in positive mode, and [M-H]- ion atm/z 407.2803, [M+HCOO]- ion atm/z453.2857, and [2M-H]- ion atm/z815.5698 in the negative mode. The ions representing a series of H2O loss was observed, such as 373.2749 [M+H-2H2O]+ and 355.2649 [M+H-3H2O]+. It was tentatively characterized as cholanic acid.Compound67showed [M-H]- ion atm/z391.2852, [M+HCOO]- ion atm/z 437.2903, and [2M-H]- atm/z783.5792 in the full mass spectrum. The molecular formula was calculated as C24H40O4. It was tentatively deduced as hyodeoxycholic acid.Quinones derivatives. Quinones derivatives are another kind of active constituents from Danshen and they were easily detected in XXT sample. Compounds63,71, and76were identified as dihydrotanshinone, cryptotanshinone, and tanshinone II A by comparison with reference substances. They displayed similar fragmentation pathways concerning successive eliminations of H2O and CO molecules. Tanshinone IIA was used as an example to illustrate the fragmentation pathway of quinones constituents as shown in Figure 6. Based on these rules as well as empirical molecular formula, 7 compounds were characterized as tanshindiol A31, 1-oxo tanshinone IIA59, neotanshinone D62, tetrahydrotanshinone I66, methyltanshinonate69, methylenetanshinquinone73, and miltirone77. [12, 16, 20, 21].Figure 6
Proposed fragmentation pathway of tanshinone IIA.Phthalide derivative. Compound21 has UV absorption at 276 nm. Its molecular formula was calculated as C12H14O3 on the basis of [M+H]+ ion atm/z 207.1024. The above data were in accordance with those of 4-hydroxyl-3-butylphthalide in the literature [22]. Compound21 was tentatively assigned as 4-hydroxyl-3-butylphthalide. It could be derived from individual herbChuanxiong rhizome [23].Among the identified compounds, most constituents were derived from the raw materials, Danshen and Renshen Jingye Zongzaogan, and a small proportion of compounds were considered from Huaihua, Maodongqing, Chuanxiong, Chansu, and Rengong Niuhuang. The other ingredients, Rengong Shexiang, Bingpian, and Shuizhi, were not characterized in the present HPLC and UPLC-QTOF/MS condition. This could be related to the prescription of raw materials and the manufacturing process employed. Usually, muscone, one of active constituents in Rengong Shexiang and borneol are detected by GC or GC-MS [3]. They are not easily detected in the liquid chromatography. Additionally, it is worth noting that no chemical information of Shuizhi, a famous traditional Chinese medicine originated from animal source, was found, although small molecule compounds with diverse structures have been reported from this drug [24]. More effort is made to explain its prescription role in XXT product.


## 4. Conclusion

In this work, HPLC analysis was employed to find out the common chromatographic peak in various batches of XXT samples and UPLC-Q-TOF/MS was used for the identification of main constituents in the typical XXT sample. As a result, a total of 63 constituents including twenty saponins, four flavonoids, fifteen phenolic acids, eight steroids, four bile acids, ten quinones, and other two compounds were identified or tentatively characterized based on the comparison of retention time and UV spectra with authentic compounds as well as by summarized MS fragmentation rules and matching empirical molecular formula with those of published components. The present investigation clearly understood the nonvolatile constituents in XXT and provided good basis for further study on the active substances and quality control of this preparation.



---

*Source: 2781597-2018-10-21.xml*