# Formulation of a Novel Nanoemulsion System for Enhanced Solubility of a Sparingly Water Soluble Antibiotic, Clarithromycin

Authors: Stuti Vatsraj; Kishor Chauhan; Hilor Pathak
Journal: Journal of Nanoscience
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

The sparingly water soluble property of majority of medicinally significant drugs acts as a potential barrier towards its utilization for therapeutic purpose. The present study was thus aimed at development of a novel oil-in-water (o/w) nanoemulsion (NE) system having ability to function as carrier for poorly soluble drugs with clarithromycin as a model antibiotic. The therapeutically effective concentration of clarithromycin, 5 mg/mL, was achieved using polysorbate 80 combined with olive oil as lipophilic counterion. A three-level three-factorial central composite experimental design was utilized to conduct the experiments. The effects of selected variables, polysorbate 80 and olive oil content and concentration of polyvinyl alcohol, were investigated. The particle size of clarithromycin for the optimized formulation was observed to be 30 nm. The morphology of the nanoemulsion was explored using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The emulsions prepared with the optimized formula demonstrated good physical stability during storage at room temperature. Antibacterial activity was conducted with the optimized nanoemulsion NESH 01 and compared with free clarithromycin. Zone of inhibition was larger for NESH 01 as compared to that with free clarithromycin. This implies that the solubility and hence the bioavailability of clarithromycin has increased in the formulated nanoemulsion system.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The increasing frequency of poorly soluble new chemical entities exhibiting therapeutic activity is of major concern to the pharmaceutical industry [1]. These drugs are difficult to process or administer to patients due to poor dissolution. This is the major hurdle that prevents the commercialization of poorly water soluble drugs. There are various techniques available to improve the solubility of such drugs. One of them includes formulation of emulsions using a biocompatible emulsifier to disperse oil in an aqueous phase and is widely used for drug delivery [2–6]. The emulsions are usually biocompatible, biodegradable, physically stable (particularly nanoemulsions and microemulsions), and relatively easy to produce on a large scale [7].Nanoemulsions (NEs) can be defined as nonequilibrium, heterogeneous systems consisting of two immiscible liquids in which one liquid is dispersed in another liquid as droplets with diameters of tens to a few hundred nanometers [8]. The major advantages of nanoemulsions as drug delivery carriers include ease of fabrication, increased drug loading, enhanced drug solubility and bioavailability, reduced patient variability, controlled drug release, and protection from enzymatic degradation [8].Clarithromycin (CLA) is a semisynthetic macrolide antibiotic having a 14-membered ring (Figure1). The chemical structure of CLA differs from erythromycin at position 6 on the lactone ring where the hydroxyl group of later is replaced by methyl group. These chemical modifications rendered CLA acid stable having an increased spectrum of activity, better pharmacokinetic properties, and fewer gastrointestinal adverse effects than erythromycin [9]. Since it is acid stable, clarithromycin is also used to treat the infections in the gastrointestinal tract. However, CLA depicts poor water solubility (0.34 mg/L) which is the major hindrance for its therapeutic usage.Figure 1
Structure of clarithromycin.Very sparse studies have been reported towards enhancement of the solubility of CLA. A tocol emulsion for the intravenous delivery of CLA was prepared and demonstrated a marked pain reduction [7]. However, the concentration of drug in the formulation was 2.5 mg/mL which was not high enough to be therapeutically useful. A tocol emulsion using tocopherol succinate (TS) as lipophilic counterions to improve CLA solubility was reported by Constantinides et al. [10]. However, relatively high content of tocopherol and the need for bioincompatible surfactants for formulation led to regulatory issues [11].Taking into consideration the above concerns, the present study was aimed at increasing the solubility of sparingly water soluble clarithromycin drug by fabrication of oil in water nanoemulsion system and investigating its antibacterial activity.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Chemicals

Clarithromycin (CLA) as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) was a kind gift from Astron Research Limited, Ahmedabad, India. Polysorbate 80 and polyvinyl alcohol were procured from Himedia (Mumbai, India). Purified olive oil and squalene were procured from Merck (Germany). All reagents used in the present study were of analytical grade.


### 2.2. Formulation of Oil in Water (O/W) Nanoemulsion

For the formulation of oil in water (O/W) nanoemulsion, oil phase was constructed using olive oil, squalene, Triton X 100, and polysorbate 80 as shown in Table1. The oil phase was further mixed using a cyclomixer for 20 minutes. The aqueous phase consisted of (0.1%) polyvinyl alcohol or (0.1%) polyethylene glycol. 10 μL of the above oil phase was subsequently added to 550 μL of aqueous phase and sonicated using an ultrasonicator bath for 10 minutes.Table 1
Range of values for the response surface method.
Independent variables
Levels
-
α
−1
0
+1
+
α
Olive oil volume (μL)
−163.7
5
252.5
500
668.7
Polysorbate 80 (μL)
159.1
500
1000
1500
1840.8
Polyvinyl alcohol (%)
−0.20
0.1
0.55
1
1.3


### 2.3. Fabrication of NESH 01 Containing CLA

NESH 01 (Table1) was further used in the present study. NESH 01 nanoemulsion is an oil-in-water emulsion manufactured from ingredients that are on the FDA list of recognized ingredients in drug substances. The emulsion was fabricated using olive oil, polysorbate 80, clarithromycin, polyvinyl alcohol, and water. For fabrication of the nanoemulsion, the lipid phase comprised CLA dissolved in olive oil (5 mg/mL) and polysorbate 80. 10 μL of this phase was added to aqueous phase which comprised 550 μL of 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol. All the ingredients were subjected to vortexing followed by ultrasonication (Sonics VC505, Vibra Cell, USA) for 10 min. Optimization of oil phase content in the nanoemulsion was performed as shown in Figure 2. The nanoemulsion obtained in this manner was subjected to further characterization.Figure 2
Optimization of oil phase content for nanoemulsion system.


### 2.4. Characterization of NESH 01

#### 2.4.1. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Morphology and structure of the nanoemulsions were studied using transmission electron microscopy (Jeol, JEM 2100, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 200 KV and capable of point-to-point resolution. Combination of bright field imaging at increasing magnification and of different diffraction modes was used to reveal the form and size of nanoemulsion droplets. In order to perform the TEM observations, a drop of the nanoemulsion was directly deposited on the copper coated film grid and observed after drying.


#### 2.4.2. Nanoemulsion Droplet Size Analysis

Droplet size distribution of the nanoemulsion was determined by photon correlation spectroscopy, which analyzes the fluctuations in light scattering due to Brownian motion of the particles, using a Zetasizer S-90 1000 HS (Malvern Instruments, UK). Light scattering was monitored at 25°C at a 90° angle. Droplet size distribution studies were performed at a fixed refractive index of the respective formulation. The O/W emulsions were diluted 1 : 200 with water before the measurement.


#### 2.4.3. Refractive Index

Refractive index of nanoemulsion formulation NESH 01 was determined using an Abbes-type refractometer.


### 2.5. Optimization of Nanoemulsion Formulation by Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to evaluate the individual as well as the combined effect of ratio of nanoemulsion ingredients like olive oil, polysorbate 80, and polyvinyl alcohol concentration using the central composite design (CCD). According to this design the total number of experimental combinations was2
k
+
2
k
+
n
0, where k is the number of independent variables and n
0 is number of repetition of experiments at the center point. The “Design-Expert” version 8.0.4.1, State-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, USA, was used for experimental design, regression, and graphical analysis of the data obtained [12–14]. Volumes of olive oil, polysorbate 80, and polyvinyl alcohol concentration were studied at five different levels (Table 1).A set of 20 experiments was performed. The minimum and maximum ranges of variables were used and the full experiment design with respect to their values was generated (Table2). The data obtained from RSM was subjected to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the results of RSM were used to fit a second-order polynomial equation:
(1)
Y
=
β
0
+
β
1
A
+
β
2
B
+
β
3
C
+
β
1
β
2
A
B
+
β
1
β
3
A
C
+
β
2
β
3
B
C
+
β
1
β
1
A
2
+
β
2
β
2
B
2
+
β
3
β
3
C
2
,
where Y is response variable (dependent variable), β
0 is intercept (constant), β
1, β
2, and β
3 are linear coefficients, β
1
β
2, β
1
β
3, and β
2
β
3 are interaction coefficients, β
1
β
1, β
2
β
2, and β
3
β
3 are squared coefficients, and A, B, C, A
B, A
C, B
C, A
2, B
2, and C
2 are levels of independent variables. Statistical significance of the above model equation was determined by Fisher’s test value, and the proportion of variance explained by the model was given by the multiple coefficient of determination, R squared (R
2) value. The response variable Y, in the present study, is the droplet size diameter and its desirable value is <100 nm for formulation of oil-in-water nanoemulsion.Table 2
Experimental setup for 20 experiments.
Std. run
Olive oil (μL)
Polysorbate 80 (μL)
PVA (%)
Coded
Actual
Coded
Actual
Coded
Actual
1
−1.000
5
−1.000
500
−1.000
0.1
2
1.000
500
−1.000
500
−1.000
0.1
3
−1.000
5
1.000
1500
−1.000
0.1
4
1.000
500
1.000
1500
−1.000
0.1
5
−1.000
5
−1.000
500
1.000
1
6
1.000
500
−1.000
500
1.000
1
7
−1.000
5
1.000
1500
1.000
1
8
1.000
500
1.000
1500
1.000
1
9
−1.682
−163.744
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
10
1.682
668.7437
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
11
0.000
252.5
−1.682
159.1036
0.000
0.55
12
0.000
252.5
1.682
1840.896
0.000
0.55
13
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
−1.682
−0.20681
14
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
1.682
1.306807
15
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
16
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
17
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
18
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
19
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
20
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55


### 2.6. Stability Studies

#### 2.6.1. Temporal Stability

The temporal study was done for a period of 7 days by measurement of the droplet diameter size and refractive index of the nanoemulsions at an interval of 24 hours. The nanoemulsion was stored at room temperature until further usage.


#### 2.6.2. Temperature Stability

To investigate the thermal stability of the nanoemulsion, the system NESH 01 was incubated for one hour at the temperature range from 20°C to 100°C followed by the measurement of the droplet diameter of the nanoemulsions.


### 2.7. Antibacterial Activity of Fabricated Nanoemulsion

The bacterial isolatesBacillus subtilisMTCC 121,Bacillus megateriumMTCC 428,Enterobacter aerogenesMTCC 111,Streptococcus pneumoniaeMTCC 655,Azotobacter chrococcus MTCC 446, andEscherichia coli MTCC 1610 were procured from MTCC Chandigarh, India, for the experimental purpose.Antibacterial activity of the fabricated nanoemulsion NESH-01 was determined using standard spread plate method [13]. Hundred microliters of nanoemulsion was added to the wells on these plates, incubated at 4°C for 30 minutes, and then incubated at 37°C. Plates were observed for zone of growth inhibition around the wells after 24 h of incubation. Free clarithromycin (0.65 mg) was used as positive control. The nanoemulsion without antibiotic was used as negative control.


## 2.1. Chemicals

Clarithromycin (CLA) as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) was a kind gift from Astron Research Limited, Ahmedabad, India. Polysorbate 80 and polyvinyl alcohol were procured from Himedia (Mumbai, India). Purified olive oil and squalene were procured from Merck (Germany). All reagents used in the present study were of analytical grade.


## 2.2. Formulation of Oil in Water (O/W) Nanoemulsion

For the formulation of oil in water (O/W) nanoemulsion, oil phase was constructed using olive oil, squalene, Triton X 100, and polysorbate 80 as shown in Table1. The oil phase was further mixed using a cyclomixer for 20 minutes. The aqueous phase consisted of (0.1%) polyvinyl alcohol or (0.1%) polyethylene glycol. 10 μL of the above oil phase was subsequently added to 550 μL of aqueous phase and sonicated using an ultrasonicator bath for 10 minutes.Table 1
Range of values for the response surface method.
Independent variables
Levels
-
α
−1
0
+1
+
α
Olive oil volume (μL)
−163.7
5
252.5
500
668.7
Polysorbate 80 (μL)
159.1
500
1000
1500
1840.8
Polyvinyl alcohol (%)
−0.20
0.1
0.55
1
1.3


## 2.3. Fabrication of NESH 01 Containing CLA

NESH 01 (Table1) was further used in the present study. NESH 01 nanoemulsion is an oil-in-water emulsion manufactured from ingredients that are on the FDA list of recognized ingredients in drug substances. The emulsion was fabricated using olive oil, polysorbate 80, clarithromycin, polyvinyl alcohol, and water. For fabrication of the nanoemulsion, the lipid phase comprised CLA dissolved in olive oil (5 mg/mL) and polysorbate 80. 10 μL of this phase was added to aqueous phase which comprised 550 μL of 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol. All the ingredients were subjected to vortexing followed by ultrasonication (Sonics VC505, Vibra Cell, USA) for 10 min. Optimization of oil phase content in the nanoemulsion was performed as shown in Figure 2. The nanoemulsion obtained in this manner was subjected to further characterization.Figure 2
Optimization of oil phase content for nanoemulsion system.


## 2.4. Characterization of NESH 01

### 2.4.1. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Morphology and structure of the nanoemulsions were studied using transmission electron microscopy (Jeol, JEM 2100, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 200 KV and capable of point-to-point resolution. Combination of bright field imaging at increasing magnification and of different diffraction modes was used to reveal the form and size of nanoemulsion droplets. In order to perform the TEM observations, a drop of the nanoemulsion was directly deposited on the copper coated film grid and observed after drying.


### 2.4.2. Nanoemulsion Droplet Size Analysis

Droplet size distribution of the nanoemulsion was determined by photon correlation spectroscopy, which analyzes the fluctuations in light scattering due to Brownian motion of the particles, using a Zetasizer S-90 1000 HS (Malvern Instruments, UK). Light scattering was monitored at 25°C at a 90° angle. Droplet size distribution studies were performed at a fixed refractive index of the respective formulation. The O/W emulsions were diluted 1 : 200 with water before the measurement.


### 2.4.3. Refractive Index

Refractive index of nanoemulsion formulation NESH 01 was determined using an Abbes-type refractometer.


## 2.4.1. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Morphology and structure of the nanoemulsions were studied using transmission electron microscopy (Jeol, JEM 2100, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 200 KV and capable of point-to-point resolution. Combination of bright field imaging at increasing magnification and of different diffraction modes was used to reveal the form and size of nanoemulsion droplets. In order to perform the TEM observations, a drop of the nanoemulsion was directly deposited on the copper coated film grid and observed after drying.


## 2.4.2. Nanoemulsion Droplet Size Analysis

Droplet size distribution of the nanoemulsion was determined by photon correlation spectroscopy, which analyzes the fluctuations in light scattering due to Brownian motion of the particles, using a Zetasizer S-90 1000 HS (Malvern Instruments, UK). Light scattering was monitored at 25°C at a 90° angle. Droplet size distribution studies were performed at a fixed refractive index of the respective formulation. The O/W emulsions were diluted 1 : 200 with water before the measurement.


## 2.4.3. Refractive Index

Refractive index of nanoemulsion formulation NESH 01 was determined using an Abbes-type refractometer.


## 2.5. Optimization of Nanoemulsion Formulation by Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to evaluate the individual as well as the combined effect of ratio of nanoemulsion ingredients like olive oil, polysorbate 80, and polyvinyl alcohol concentration using the central composite design (CCD). According to this design the total number of experimental combinations was2
k
+
2
k
+
n
0, where k is the number of independent variables and n
0 is number of repetition of experiments at the center point. The “Design-Expert” version 8.0.4.1, State-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, USA, was used for experimental design, regression, and graphical analysis of the data obtained [12–14]. Volumes of olive oil, polysorbate 80, and polyvinyl alcohol concentration were studied at five different levels (Table 1).A set of 20 experiments was performed. The minimum and maximum ranges of variables were used and the full experiment design with respect to their values was generated (Table2). The data obtained from RSM was subjected to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the results of RSM were used to fit a second-order polynomial equation:
(1)
Y
=
β
0
+
β
1
A
+
β
2
B
+
β
3
C
+
β
1
β
2
A
B
+
β
1
β
3
A
C
+
β
2
β
3
B
C
+
β
1
β
1
A
2
+
β
2
β
2
B
2
+
β
3
β
3
C
2
,
where Y is response variable (dependent variable), β
0 is intercept (constant), β
1, β
2, and β
3 are linear coefficients, β
1
β
2, β
1
β
3, and β
2
β
3 are interaction coefficients, β
1
β
1, β
2
β
2, and β
3
β
3 are squared coefficients, and A, B, C, A
B, A
C, B
C, A
2, B
2, and C
2 are levels of independent variables. Statistical significance of the above model equation was determined by Fisher’s test value, and the proportion of variance explained by the model was given by the multiple coefficient of determination, R squared (R
2) value. The response variable Y, in the present study, is the droplet size diameter and its desirable value is <100 nm for formulation of oil-in-water nanoemulsion.Table 2
Experimental setup for 20 experiments.
Std. run
Olive oil (μL)
Polysorbate 80 (μL)
PVA (%)
Coded
Actual
Coded
Actual
Coded
Actual
1
−1.000
5
−1.000
500
−1.000
0.1
2
1.000
500
−1.000
500
−1.000
0.1
3
−1.000
5
1.000
1500
−1.000
0.1
4
1.000
500
1.000
1500
−1.000
0.1
5
−1.000
5
−1.000
500
1.000
1
6
1.000
500
−1.000
500
1.000
1
7
−1.000
5
1.000
1500
1.000
1
8
1.000
500
1.000
1500
1.000
1
9
−1.682
−163.744
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
10
1.682
668.7437
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
11
0.000
252.5
−1.682
159.1036
0.000
0.55
12
0.000
252.5
1.682
1840.896
0.000
0.55
13
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
−1.682
−0.20681
14
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
1.682
1.306807
15
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
16
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
17
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
18
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
19
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55
20
0.000
252.5
0.000
1000
0.000
0.55


## 2.6. Stability Studies

### 2.6.1. Temporal Stability

The temporal study was done for a period of 7 days by measurement of the droplet diameter size and refractive index of the nanoemulsions at an interval of 24 hours. The nanoemulsion was stored at room temperature until further usage.


### 2.6.2. Temperature Stability

To investigate the thermal stability of the nanoemulsion, the system NESH 01 was incubated for one hour at the temperature range from 20°C to 100°C followed by the measurement of the droplet diameter of the nanoemulsions.


## 2.6.1. Temporal Stability

The temporal study was done for a period of 7 days by measurement of the droplet diameter size and refractive index of the nanoemulsions at an interval of 24 hours. The nanoemulsion was stored at room temperature until further usage.


## 2.6.2. Temperature Stability

To investigate the thermal stability of the nanoemulsion, the system NESH 01 was incubated for one hour at the temperature range from 20°C to 100°C followed by the measurement of the droplet diameter of the nanoemulsions.


## 2.7. Antibacterial Activity of Fabricated Nanoemulsion

The bacterial isolatesBacillus subtilisMTCC 121,Bacillus megateriumMTCC 428,Enterobacter aerogenesMTCC 111,Streptococcus pneumoniaeMTCC 655,Azotobacter chrococcus MTCC 446, andEscherichia coli MTCC 1610 were procured from MTCC Chandigarh, India, for the experimental purpose.Antibacterial activity of the fabricated nanoemulsion NESH-01 was determined using standard spread plate method [13]. Hundred microliters of nanoemulsion was added to the wells on these plates, incubated at 4°C for 30 minutes, and then incubated at 37°C. Plates were observed for zone of growth inhibition around the wells after 24 h of incubation. Free clarithromycin (0.65 mg) was used as positive control. The nanoemulsion without antibiotic was used as negative control.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Formulation of the Nanoemulsion Systems

The average diameter of the nanoemulsion systems is as depicted in Table3. The droplet size of O/W emulsions ranged from 68 to 380 nm. The size analysis showed a mean diameter of 68 nm for olive oil-loaded emulsions (NESH 01). Replacement of the olive oil by squalene (NESH 06) led to a drastic increase in the size from 68 to 293 nm. Addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate to NESH 01 system gave NESH 03 with a mean droplet diameter of 100 nm. The replacement of polysorbate 80 with Triton X 100 to olive oil emulsions produced system NESH 02 with a size of 125 nm. Replacement of polyvinyl alcohol with polyethylene glycol produced system NESH 04 with a mean droplet diameter of 221 nm and 380 nm for the system NESH 05 which contained squalene in place of olive oil. It is well established that droplet size imparts significant influence on the bioavailability of nanoemulsions [8]. Therefore, from the above studies, the nanoemulsion system NESH 01 which produced smallest average droplet diameter was further characterized and used in the present study.Table 3
Formulation of O/W nanoemulsion systems.
Code
O/W nanoemulsion system
Droplet diameter (nm)
NESH 01
PVA + Polysorbate 80 + Olive oil
68
±
3
NESH 02
PVA + Triton X 100 + Olive oil
125
±
5
NESH 03
PVA + SDS + Polysorbate 80 + Olive oil
100
±
6
NESH 04
PEG + Polysorbate 80 + Olive oil
220
±
2
NESH 05
PEG + Polysorbate 80 + Squalene
380
±
7
NESH 06
PVA + Polysorbate 80 + Squalene
293
±
3
PVA: polyvinyl alcohol; PEG: polyethylene glycol; SDS: sodium dodecyl sulfate.


### 3.2. Fabrication of NESH 01

The nanoemulsion was fabricated from FDA approved ingredients, namely, olive oil, polysorbate 80, clarithromycin, polyvinyl alcohol, and water. CLA at a concentration of 5 mg/mL was dissolved in olive oil. Olive oil provides better alternative for enhancing the solubility of the antibiotics when compared to pure long chain triglycerides as these pure compounds are more expensive than olive oil. Moreover, olive oil mainly comprises long chain triglycerides—palmitic acid and oleic acid which portray rational solubility for CLA. Li et al. [7] reported the tocopherol succinate nanoemulsion and enhanced the solubility of CLA up to 5 mg/mL. A comparable solubility was achieved with the use of olive oil in the present study.The ability of surfactant molecules to give the necessary curvature of the interfacial surface required to form fine micelles has been associated with the packaging geometry. This refers to the ratio between hydrocarbon volumes, optimum head group area, and tail length of the molecule at the interface [15]. In the present study polysorbate 80 is used as an emulsifier. It comprises oleic acid and polyethoxylated sorbitan. The oleic acid acts as surplus lipophilic counterion that ameliorates the physicochemical properties of the oil phase, resulting in an enhanced solubilizing capacity for CLA. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on formulation of a nanoemulsion system using olive oil, polysorbate 80, and polyvinyl alcohol.


### 3.3. Influence of the Oil Phase Content

Clarithromycin being a poorly water soluble antibiotic; this antibiotic was dissolved in olive oil. Different concentrations of clarithromycin (1–10 mg) were added to 1500μ
L of oil phase to determine its solubility and 5 mg of the drug was found to be completely soluble in oil phase (data not shown). To optimize the oil phase content, different volumes of oil phase (10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 μL) were added to aqueous phase (500 μL). Figure 2 depicts that increase in the volume of oil phase led to an increase in the mean droplet diameter of the nanoemulsion. This observation can be accredited to the increase in the interfacial surface caused by increasing the oil volume. A similar observation was reported by He et al. [8] with protein stabilized nanoemulsions. A volume of 10 μ
L oil phase in 550 μ
L of aqueous phase produced the lowest mean droplet diameter. Hence this volume of oil phase was used for further studies.


### 3.4. Optimization of NE Droplet Size by Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

The effect of different volumes of olive oil and polysorbate 80 and different concentrations of polyvinyl alcohol on mean droplet size of NE system was evaluated. Response surface method was used to understand individual as well as combined effect of these parameters. From analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Table4) it was established that olive oil, polysorbate 80, and polyvinyl alcohol were highly significant (P
<
0.001, P
=
0.0018, and P
=
0.0359, resp.) for droplet size of the nanoemulsion system (P values less than 0.05 indicate that model terms are significant). However, combined effect of these factors was not significant (P
=
0.81, 0.30, and 0.91, resp.) for droplet size of the nanoemulsion system. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for droplet size of the nanoemulsion system shows that model fits well with the significance ofF-test = 11.81 (P
=
0.0003) as given in Table 3.Table 4
ANOVA for response surface quadratic model.
Source
Sum of squares
df
Mean square
F value
P value
Prob>
F
Model
794.6701
9
88.29667
11.81452
0.0003
A: olive oil
528.3974
1
528.3974
70.70214
<0.0001
B: polysorbate 80
132.4818
1
132.4818
17.72671
0.0018
C: PVA
43.88657
1
43.88657
5.872235
0.0359
A
B
0.452036
1
0.452036
0.060485
0.8107
A
C
8.555034
1
8.555034
1.144705
0.3098
B
C
0.094241
1
0.094241
0.01261
0.9128
A
2
1.474551
1
1.474551
0.197302
0.6664
B
2
46.06179
1
46.06179
6.163291
0.0324
C
2
36.40223
1
36.40223
4.870796
0.0518
Residual
74.7357
10
7.47357
Lack of fit
74.7357
5
14.94714The contour plot in Figure3(a) exhibits the behavior of droplet size (nm) of nanoemulsion with respect to changes in volume of polysorbate 80 and olive oil in the selected range, while PVA concentration being constant (0.55%). The optimal values of the selected variables are obtained when moving along the major and minor axis of the ellipse. Higher volume of polysorbate 80 coupled with lower volume of olive oil produced lower droplet size while PVA concentration being constant. The contour plot in Figure 3(b) describes droplet size diameter (nm) with respect to changes in the PVA concentration and olive oil content. The contour plot in Figure 3(c) shows effect on droplet size diameter (nm) of nanoemulsion system with respect to changes in PVA concentration and polysorbate 80 content. The PVA concentration 0.1% coupled to lower olive oil content (5 μL) and higher polysorbate 80 content (1500 μL) resulted in the droplet diameter of 50 nm.Contour plot showing interaction effect of (a) olive oil and polysorbate 80; (b) olive oil and PVA; and (c) PVA and polysorbate 80 [DLS: dynamic light scattering (nm)].
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.5. Physical Stability Studies

#### 3.5.1. Temporal Stability of NESH 01

The temporal study of the NESH 01 system was studied in terms of droplet diameter and refractive index for a period of seven days. The data shown in Table5(a) suggests that the NESH 01 is stable for a period of minimum one week with negligible variation in the droplet diameter.Table 5
(a) Temporal stability studies of NESH 01. (b) Temperature stability of NESH 01.
(a)
Day
Sized (nm)
Refractive index
1
30
1.334
2
32
1.334
3
33
1.334
4
35
1.334
5
36
1.334
6
35
1.334
7
37
1.334
(b)
Temperature (°C)
Sized (nm)
20
30
30
32
40
33
50
31
60
42
70
69
80
119
90
139
100
167


#### 3.5.2. Temperature Stability of NESH 01

The NESH 01 was tested for its temperature stability in the range of 20–100°C for a period of one hour. NESH 01 was found to be almost stable up to 60°C and the droplet size increases gradually thereafter (Table5(b)). No similar data on temperature stability are yet available in the literature for comparison.


### 3.6. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

The droplets in the nanoemulsion appear dark, and the surroundings are bright (Figure4); a “positive” image was seen using TEM. Some droplet sizes were measured using TEM, as it is capable of point-to-point resolution. The droplet size was in agreement with the results obtained from droplet size analysis using the Zetasizer.Figure 4
TEM photograph of NESH 01.


### 3.7. Antibacterial Activity of NESH 01

The antibacterial activity of NESH 01 was conducted using different cultures procured from MTCC by standard spread plate technique. The results (Table6) show that free clarithromycin shows a smaller zone of inhibition as compared to that of clarithromycin formulated NE (NESH 01). NESH 01 lacking the antibiotic clarithromycin was also tested for the antibacterial activity. However, no zone of inhibition was observed with any of the strains in absence of clarithromycin. This implies that the solubility and hence the bioavailability of the antibiotic clarithromycin increases in a nanoemulsion system like NESH 01.Table 6
Antibacterial activity of NESH 01.
MTCC bacterial strains
Zone of inhibition with free clarithromycin
Zone of inhibition with NESH 01 containing clarithromycin
Zone of inhibition with NESH 01 without clarithromycin
Bacillus subtilisMTCC 121
1.1
1.8
BDL
Bacillus megateriumMTCC 428
1.4
2.3
BDL
Enterobacter aerogenesMTCC 111
1.8
2.2
BDL
Escherichia coliMTCC 1610
BDL
BDL
BDL
Streptococcus pneumoniaeMTCC 655
2.0
2.4
BDL
Azotobacter chrococcus MTCC 446
1.6
2.0
BDL
BDL: below detection level.


## 3.1. Formulation of the Nanoemulsion Systems

The average diameter of the nanoemulsion systems is as depicted in Table3. The droplet size of O/W emulsions ranged from 68 to 380 nm. The size analysis showed a mean diameter of 68 nm for olive oil-loaded emulsions (NESH 01). Replacement of the olive oil by squalene (NESH 06) led to a drastic increase in the size from 68 to 293 nm. Addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate to NESH 01 system gave NESH 03 with a mean droplet diameter of 100 nm. The replacement of polysorbate 80 with Triton X 100 to olive oil emulsions produced system NESH 02 with a size of 125 nm. Replacement of polyvinyl alcohol with polyethylene glycol produced system NESH 04 with a mean droplet diameter of 221 nm and 380 nm for the system NESH 05 which contained squalene in place of olive oil. It is well established that droplet size imparts significant influence on the bioavailability of nanoemulsions [8]. Therefore, from the above studies, the nanoemulsion system NESH 01 which produced smallest average droplet diameter was further characterized and used in the present study.Table 3
Formulation of O/W nanoemulsion systems.
Code
O/W nanoemulsion system
Droplet diameter (nm)
NESH 01
PVA + Polysorbate 80 + Olive oil
68
±
3
NESH 02
PVA + Triton X 100 + Olive oil
125
±
5
NESH 03
PVA + SDS + Polysorbate 80 + Olive oil
100
±
6
NESH 04
PEG + Polysorbate 80 + Olive oil
220
±
2
NESH 05
PEG + Polysorbate 80 + Squalene
380
±
7
NESH 06
PVA + Polysorbate 80 + Squalene
293
±
3
PVA: polyvinyl alcohol; PEG: polyethylene glycol; SDS: sodium dodecyl sulfate.


## 3.2. Fabrication of NESH 01

The nanoemulsion was fabricated from FDA approved ingredients, namely, olive oil, polysorbate 80, clarithromycin, polyvinyl alcohol, and water. CLA at a concentration of 5 mg/mL was dissolved in olive oil. Olive oil provides better alternative for enhancing the solubility of the antibiotics when compared to pure long chain triglycerides as these pure compounds are more expensive than olive oil. Moreover, olive oil mainly comprises long chain triglycerides—palmitic acid and oleic acid which portray rational solubility for CLA. Li et al. [7] reported the tocopherol succinate nanoemulsion and enhanced the solubility of CLA up to 5 mg/mL. A comparable solubility was achieved with the use of olive oil in the present study.The ability of surfactant molecules to give the necessary curvature of the interfacial surface required to form fine micelles has been associated with the packaging geometry. This refers to the ratio between hydrocarbon volumes, optimum head group area, and tail length of the molecule at the interface [15]. In the present study polysorbate 80 is used as an emulsifier. It comprises oleic acid and polyethoxylated sorbitan. The oleic acid acts as surplus lipophilic counterion that ameliorates the physicochemical properties of the oil phase, resulting in an enhanced solubilizing capacity for CLA. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on formulation of a nanoemulsion system using olive oil, polysorbate 80, and polyvinyl alcohol.


## 3.3. Influence of the Oil Phase Content

Clarithromycin being a poorly water soluble antibiotic; this antibiotic was dissolved in olive oil. Different concentrations of clarithromycin (1–10 mg) were added to 1500μ
L of oil phase to determine its solubility and 5 mg of the drug was found to be completely soluble in oil phase (data not shown). To optimize the oil phase content, different volumes of oil phase (10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 μL) were added to aqueous phase (500 μL). Figure 2 depicts that increase in the volume of oil phase led to an increase in the mean droplet diameter of the nanoemulsion. This observation can be accredited to the increase in the interfacial surface caused by increasing the oil volume. A similar observation was reported by He et al. [8] with protein stabilized nanoemulsions. A volume of 10 μ
L oil phase in 550 μ
L of aqueous phase produced the lowest mean droplet diameter. Hence this volume of oil phase was used for further studies.


## 3.4. Optimization of NE Droplet Size by Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

The effect of different volumes of olive oil and polysorbate 80 and different concentrations of polyvinyl alcohol on mean droplet size of NE system was evaluated. Response surface method was used to understand individual as well as combined effect of these parameters. From analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Table4) it was established that olive oil, polysorbate 80, and polyvinyl alcohol were highly significant (P
<
0.001, P
=
0.0018, and P
=
0.0359, resp.) for droplet size of the nanoemulsion system (P values less than 0.05 indicate that model terms are significant). However, combined effect of these factors was not significant (P
=
0.81, 0.30, and 0.91, resp.) for droplet size of the nanoemulsion system. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for droplet size of the nanoemulsion system shows that model fits well with the significance ofF-test = 11.81 (P
=
0.0003) as given in Table 3.Table 4
ANOVA for response surface quadratic model.
Source
Sum of squares
df
Mean square
F value
P value
Prob>
F
Model
794.6701
9
88.29667
11.81452
0.0003
A: olive oil
528.3974
1
528.3974
70.70214
<0.0001
B: polysorbate 80
132.4818
1
132.4818
17.72671
0.0018
C: PVA
43.88657
1
43.88657
5.872235
0.0359
A
B
0.452036
1
0.452036
0.060485
0.8107
A
C
8.555034
1
8.555034
1.144705
0.3098
B
C
0.094241
1
0.094241
0.01261
0.9128
A
2
1.474551
1
1.474551
0.197302
0.6664
B
2
46.06179
1
46.06179
6.163291
0.0324
C
2
36.40223
1
36.40223
4.870796
0.0518
Residual
74.7357
10
7.47357
Lack of fit
74.7357
5
14.94714The contour plot in Figure3(a) exhibits the behavior of droplet size (nm) of nanoemulsion with respect to changes in volume of polysorbate 80 and olive oil in the selected range, while PVA concentration being constant (0.55%). The optimal values of the selected variables are obtained when moving along the major and minor axis of the ellipse. Higher volume of polysorbate 80 coupled with lower volume of olive oil produced lower droplet size while PVA concentration being constant. The contour plot in Figure 3(b) describes droplet size diameter (nm) with respect to changes in the PVA concentration and olive oil content. The contour plot in Figure 3(c) shows effect on droplet size diameter (nm) of nanoemulsion system with respect to changes in PVA concentration and polysorbate 80 content. The PVA concentration 0.1% coupled to lower olive oil content (5 μL) and higher polysorbate 80 content (1500 μL) resulted in the droplet diameter of 50 nm.Contour plot showing interaction effect of (a) olive oil and polysorbate 80; (b) olive oil and PVA; and (c) PVA and polysorbate 80 [DLS: dynamic light scattering (nm)].
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.5. Physical Stability Studies

### 3.5.1. Temporal Stability of NESH 01

The temporal study of the NESH 01 system was studied in terms of droplet diameter and refractive index for a period of seven days. The data shown in Table5(a) suggests that the NESH 01 is stable for a period of minimum one week with negligible variation in the droplet diameter.Table 5
(a) Temporal stability studies of NESH 01. (b) Temperature stability of NESH 01.
(a)
Day
Sized (nm)
Refractive index
1
30
1.334
2
32
1.334
3
33
1.334
4
35
1.334
5
36
1.334
6
35
1.334
7
37
1.334
(b)
Temperature (°C)
Sized (nm)
20
30
30
32
40
33
50
31
60
42
70
69
80
119
90
139
100
167


### 3.5.2. Temperature Stability of NESH 01

The NESH 01 was tested for its temperature stability in the range of 20–100°C for a period of one hour. NESH 01 was found to be almost stable up to 60°C and the droplet size increases gradually thereafter (Table5(b)). No similar data on temperature stability are yet available in the literature for comparison.


## 3.5.1. Temporal Stability of NESH 01

The temporal study of the NESH 01 system was studied in terms of droplet diameter and refractive index for a period of seven days. The data shown in Table5(a) suggests that the NESH 01 is stable for a period of minimum one week with negligible variation in the droplet diameter.Table 5
(a) Temporal stability studies of NESH 01. (b) Temperature stability of NESH 01.
(a)
Day
Sized (nm)
Refractive index
1
30
1.334
2
32
1.334
3
33
1.334
4
35
1.334
5
36
1.334
6
35
1.334
7
37
1.334
(b)
Temperature (°C)
Sized (nm)
20
30
30
32
40
33
50
31
60
42
70
69
80
119
90
139
100
167


## 3.5.2. Temperature Stability of NESH 01

The NESH 01 was tested for its temperature stability in the range of 20–100°C for a period of one hour. NESH 01 was found to be almost stable up to 60°C and the droplet size increases gradually thereafter (Table5(b)). No similar data on temperature stability are yet available in the literature for comparison.


## 3.6. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

The droplets in the nanoemulsion appear dark, and the surroundings are bright (Figure4); a “positive” image was seen using TEM. Some droplet sizes were measured using TEM, as it is capable of point-to-point resolution. The droplet size was in agreement with the results obtained from droplet size analysis using the Zetasizer.Figure 4
TEM photograph of NESH 01.


## 3.7. Antibacterial Activity of NESH 01

The antibacterial activity of NESH 01 was conducted using different cultures procured from MTCC by standard spread plate technique. The results (Table6) show that free clarithromycin shows a smaller zone of inhibition as compared to that of clarithromycin formulated NE (NESH 01). NESH 01 lacking the antibiotic clarithromycin was also tested for the antibacterial activity. However, no zone of inhibition was observed with any of the strains in absence of clarithromycin. This implies that the solubility and hence the bioavailability of the antibiotic clarithromycin increases in a nanoemulsion system like NESH 01.Table 6
Antibacterial activity of NESH 01.
MTCC bacterial strains
Zone of inhibition with free clarithromycin
Zone of inhibition with NESH 01 containing clarithromycin
Zone of inhibition with NESH 01 without clarithromycin
Bacillus subtilisMTCC 121
1.1
1.8
BDL
Bacillus megateriumMTCC 428
1.4
2.3
BDL
Enterobacter aerogenesMTCC 111
1.8
2.2
BDL
Escherichia coliMTCC 1610
BDL
BDL
BDL
Streptococcus pneumoniaeMTCC 655
2.0
2.4
BDL
Azotobacter chrococcus MTCC 446
1.6
2.0
BDL
BDL: below detection level.


## 4. Conclusion

Biocompatible oil in water nanoemulsion was fabricated successfully as a vehicle to transport a poorly water soluble drug, clarithromycin. Such nanoemulsions enable the lipophilic drug to be absorbed more rapidly and better when compared with the oil solution. The droplet diameter of the nanoemulsion system was affected dramatically by the type of oil, the oil phase content, type of surfactant, and the temperature. This nanoemulsion system enhanced the solubility (5 mg/mL) and hence the bioavailability of clarithromycin as evidenced from the increase in zone of inhibition in the antibacterial activity assay. Furthermore, this system was stable for at least one week. In conclusion, the preceding properties of the novel nanoemulsion system NESH 01 postulate its expediency for clinical applications of highly potent sparingly water soluble drugs by enhancing their bioavailability.



---

*Source: 268293-2014-03-23.xml*