# Mandibular Canal Course and the Position of the Mental Foramen by Panoramic X-Ray in Chilean Individuals

Authors: Gloria Cartes; Ivonne Garay; Naira Figueiredo Deana; Pablo Navarro; Nilton Alves
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

The object of this study was to analyse the morphology and morphometry of the mandibular canal (MC) course and the mental foramen (MF) position in relation to the inferior teeth by panoramic X-ray (PAN). Vertical linear measurements were taken of each hemimandible to obtain the length of the distances analysed. We studied the MF position in relation to inferior premolar roots and the relation between the MC and mandibular teeth roots (MCR). The MF was usually located between the apices of the first and second premolars in younger individuals and immediately below the apex of the inferior second premolar in older individuals. The MC evinced proximity to the third molar, and this relation was not affected by sex or age group. The distances analysed in this study presented a marked difference between gender, with larger values in males than in females. The variations which may occur between individuals and different populations make it essential for dentists and surgeons to plan carefully before procedures involving this region.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The mandible is an irregular, symmetrical bone which makes up the lower third of the face. It consists of a body and two rami which extend from the body’s posterior ends [1]. The mandibular canal (MC) starts at the mandibular foramen and extends through the body of the mandible, towards the median plane. The inferior alveolar vasculonervous bundle passes through the mandibular foramen [1]. In panoramic X-ray images, the MC appears as a dark band of radiolucence flanked by two radio-opaque lines [2]. The mandibular canal gives rise to another small canal which opens in the mental foramen (MF). During surgery, the MC is used as a reference point [3]. The MC is of particular importance for dentists and oral specialists, as it carries the portion of the mandibular nerve responsible for inferior lip and teeth innervation [4, 5]. Special care is required in some procedures in this region because a lesion to the related blood vessels may cause excessive damage and lesion to vital structures. Lesions to the inferior alveolar nerve may cause pain and alterations in the patient’s sensitivity [6]. Knowledge about the morphology and topography of the mandibular canal is important when carrying out interventions in the mandible, in order to preserve anatomical structures which pass through it. Not only is anatomical knowledge about the region a contributory factor to success in some procedures such as successful local anaesthesia in the inferior alveolar nerve terminal branches [7], but also it may be a determining factor in reducing paresthesia and haemorrhage occurrence, as well as lowering the risk of complications during surgical procedures such as osteotomy and mandibular implant positioning [8]. Previous studies have shown that MC course and MF position may vary between different populations [4, 7]. Few studies have been carried out in Chilean individuals in this respect, and exact data is needed for this population. The object of this study was to analyse the morphology and morphometry of MC course and position and MF position in relation to inferior teeth in adult Chileans by panoramic X-ray (PAN), considering age and sex.


## 2. Material and Methods

We carried out a descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional study. We examined 442 panoramic X-rays taken between June 2014 and June 2016 as part of the diagnosis or treatment planning for patients who attended the Dental Teaching Clinic at the Faculty of Dentistry at the Universidad de La Frontera, Chile.The sample included patient X-rays divided into four groups by age and gender: females between 18 and 34 years; females aged 35 or more; males between 18 and 34 years; and males aged 35 or more. Inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) patients of either sex aged 18 or over; (2) panoramic X-rays which clearly showed the reference points determined for measuring the distances. Exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) previously extracted premolars; (2) in-progress or completed orthodontic treatment; (3) fractures or surgery in the area which might affect X-ray interpretation; (4) pathology or congenital anomaly which might affect X-ray interpretation; (5) X-rays of patients with badly positioned teeth in the relation between the MF and the inferior teeth; (6) MF absent or not visible in the PAN.PANs were taken by PAX-400C orthopantomograph, Vatech Co., Korea, Series 003-0848. The linear measurements were taken with AutoCAD 2010 software.


### 2.1. Linear Measurements

Vertical linear measurements were taken in digital PAN using specific points on the mandible as reference points. The following measurements were taken in each X-ray, following Amorim et al. [10] (Figure 1):Figure 1
Panoramic X-rays illustrating the vertical linear measurements D1 to D7 on left and right sides (‘). D1: vertical distance from the inferior border of the mental foramen to the inferior limit of the base of mandible; D2: vertical distance from the superior border of the mental foramen to the superior limit of the highest alveolar ridge; D3: vertical distance from the inferior border of the mandibular canal to the inferior border of the base of mandible, on a vertical line through the mandibular ramus anterior border; D4: vertical distance from the superior border of the mandibular canal to the inferior limit of the oblique line, on a vertical line through the mandibular ramus anterior border; D5: vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular canal to the inferior limit of the base of mandible; D6: vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular notch to the mandibular foramen; D7: vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular notch to the inferior border of the mandibular ramus. The mean values were calculated for distances D1-D7, considering sex, side, and age group.D1 is vertical distance from the inferior border of the mental foramen to the inferior limit of the base of mandible; D2 is vertical distance from the superior border of the mental foramen to the superior limit of the highest alveolar ridge; D3 is vertical distance from the inferior border of the mandibular canal to the inferior border of the base of mandible, on a vertical line through the anterior border of the mandibular ramus; D4 is vertical distance from the superior border of the mandibular canal to the inferior limit of the oblique line, on a vertical line through the anterior border of the mandibular ramus; D5 is vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular canal to the inferior limit of the base of mandible; D6 is vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular notch to the mandibular foramen; D7 is vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular notch to the inferior border of the mandibular ramus. The mean values were calculated for distances D1-D7, considering sex, side, and age group.We also analysed the correlation between distances D1 to D7 based on four classifications: (a) measurements drawn approximately on a vertical (D1 x D2, D3 x D4, D6 x D7); (b) bilateral measurements D1 to D7 right x D1 to D7 left; (c) measurements taken above the mandibular canal (D2 x D4 x D6); (d) measurements taken below the mandibular canal (D1 x D3 x D5).


### 2.2. Relation between the Mandibular Canal and the Mandibular Teeth Roots (MCR)

The MCR was classified into three types, following Madeira [17] (Figure 2): (1) a proximity relation exists between the mandibular canal and the third molar root. From this point the mandibular canal starts to diverge gradually from the roots; (2) no proximity exists between the mandibular canal and the roots; (3) a proximity relation exists between the mandibular canal and all roots. The percentage of each MCR type was calculated, and an analysis was carried out distinguishing sex, side, and age group.Figure 2
Panoramic X-rays illustrating relation types between mandibular canal and t inferior roots. Type 1: a relation of proximity exists between the mandibular canal and the third molar root. From this point the mandibular canal starts to diverge gradually from the roots. Type 2: no proximity between mandibular canal and roots. Type 3: proximity exists between mandibular canal and roots.


### 2.3. Position of the Mental Foramen

The relation between the mental foramen and inferior premolar roots was classified in five positions, following Madeira [17] (Figure 3): Type 1: anterior to the inferior first premolar; Type 2: below the inferior first premolar apex; Type 3: between the inferior premolar roots; Type 4: immediately below the inferior second premolar apex; Type 5: posterior to the inferior second premolar. The percentage of each MF position type was calculated, and an analysis was carried out distinguishing sex, side, and age group.Figure 3
Panoramic X-rays illustrating the relation between the mental foramen (arrows) and inferior premolar roots. Type 1: anterior to the inferior first premolar. Type 2: below the inferior first premolar apex. Type 3: Between inferior premolar roots. Type 4: immediately below the inferior second premolar apex. Type 5: posterior to the inferior second premolar.


### 2.4. Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed by descriptive statistics (mean±SD). The Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene’s test were applied for variance homogeneity. The statistical difference between mean values was obtained using Student’s t-test for equality of means. All means were correlated using Pearson’s correlation test and the results were classified with Pearson’s rating scale. The Chi-squared test was used for qualitative variables. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS/PC + software, version 23.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL. The significance threshold was set atα=5%.


## 2.1. Linear Measurements

Vertical linear measurements were taken in digital PAN using specific points on the mandible as reference points. The following measurements were taken in each X-ray, following Amorim et al. [10] (Figure 1):Figure 1
Panoramic X-rays illustrating the vertical linear measurements D1 to D7 on left and right sides (‘). D1: vertical distance from the inferior border of the mental foramen to the inferior limit of the base of mandible; D2: vertical distance from the superior border of the mental foramen to the superior limit of the highest alveolar ridge; D3: vertical distance from the inferior border of the mandibular canal to the inferior border of the base of mandible, on a vertical line through the mandibular ramus anterior border; D4: vertical distance from the superior border of the mandibular canal to the inferior limit of the oblique line, on a vertical line through the mandibular ramus anterior border; D5: vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular canal to the inferior limit of the base of mandible; D6: vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular notch to the mandibular foramen; D7: vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular notch to the inferior border of the mandibular ramus. The mean values were calculated for distances D1-D7, considering sex, side, and age group.D1 is vertical distance from the inferior border of the mental foramen to the inferior limit of the base of mandible; D2 is vertical distance from the superior border of the mental foramen to the superior limit of the highest alveolar ridge; D3 is vertical distance from the inferior border of the mandibular canal to the inferior border of the base of mandible, on a vertical line through the anterior border of the mandibular ramus; D4 is vertical distance from the superior border of the mandibular canal to the inferior limit of the oblique line, on a vertical line through the anterior border of the mandibular ramus; D5 is vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular canal to the inferior limit of the base of mandible; D6 is vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular notch to the mandibular foramen; D7 is vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular notch to the inferior border of the mandibular ramus. The mean values were calculated for distances D1-D7, considering sex, side, and age group.We also analysed the correlation between distances D1 to D7 based on four classifications: (a) measurements drawn approximately on a vertical (D1 x D2, D3 x D4, D6 x D7); (b) bilateral measurements D1 to D7 right x D1 to D7 left; (c) measurements taken above the mandibular canal (D2 x D4 x D6); (d) measurements taken below the mandibular canal (D1 x D3 x D5).


## 2.2. Relation between the Mandibular Canal and the Mandibular Teeth Roots (MCR)

The MCR was classified into three types, following Madeira [17] (Figure 2): (1) a proximity relation exists between the mandibular canal and the third molar root. From this point the mandibular canal starts to diverge gradually from the roots; (2) no proximity exists between the mandibular canal and the roots; (3) a proximity relation exists between the mandibular canal and all roots. The percentage of each MCR type was calculated, and an analysis was carried out distinguishing sex, side, and age group.Figure 2
Panoramic X-rays illustrating relation types between mandibular canal and t inferior roots. Type 1: a relation of proximity exists between the mandibular canal and the third molar root. From this point the mandibular canal starts to diverge gradually from the roots. Type 2: no proximity between mandibular canal and roots. Type 3: proximity exists between mandibular canal and roots.


## 2.3. Position of the Mental Foramen

The relation between the mental foramen and inferior premolar roots was classified in five positions, following Madeira [17] (Figure 3): Type 1: anterior to the inferior first premolar; Type 2: below the inferior first premolar apex; Type 3: between the inferior premolar roots; Type 4: immediately below the inferior second premolar apex; Type 5: posterior to the inferior second premolar. The percentage of each MF position type was calculated, and an analysis was carried out distinguishing sex, side, and age group.Figure 3
Panoramic X-rays illustrating the relation between the mental foramen (arrows) and inferior premolar roots. Type 1: anterior to the inferior first premolar. Type 2: below the inferior first premolar apex. Type 3: Between inferior premolar roots. Type 4: immediately below the inferior second premolar apex. Type 5: posterior to the inferior second premolar.


## 2.4. Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed by descriptive statistics (mean±SD). The Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene’s test were applied for variance homogeneity. The statistical difference between mean values was obtained using Student’s t-test for equality of means. All means were correlated using Pearson’s correlation test and the results were classified with Pearson’s rating scale. The Chi-squared test was used for qualitative variables. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS/PC + software, version 23.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL. The significance threshold was set atα=5%.


## 3. Results

Of the 442 panoramic X-rays examined, 262 were from females and 180 from males. Of the 262 females, 191 were aged between 18 and 34 years, mean 23.01 (±4.21 years); 71 were aged over 35 years, mean 44.52 (±6.93 years); of the 180 males, 145 were aged between 18 and 34 years, mean 23.08 (±4.29 years); and 35 were aged over 35 years, mean 47.29 (±9.95 years).


### 3.1. Linear Measurements D1-D7

The mean values for D1-D7 are given in Table1, distributed by sex, side, and age group.Table 1
Mean value (in millimetres) and standard deviation (SD) of distances D1 to D7 on the right and left sides for males and females in age groups 18-34 years and ≥35 years.
Distances Females (18-34 years) Females (≥35 years) Males (18-34 years) Males (≥35 years) Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD D1R 11.33† ±1.43 11.56† ±1.32 12.85† ±1.86 12.82† ±1.34 D1L 11.37† ±1.54 11.63† ±1.67 13.10† ±1.95 13.02† ±1.32 D2R 15.83a† ±2.1 14.91a† ±1.96 17.19† ±2.63 16.56† ±2.46 D2L 15.76† ±2.25 15.19† ±2.15 16.80† ±2.32 16.39† ±1.98 D3R 8.11† ±2.22 7.84 ±1.82 9.03†a ±2.37 8.04a ±2.33 D3L 7.78† ±2.04 7.55 ±2.16 8.60†a ±2.16 7.77a ±1.98 D4R 16.03† ±2.95 15.52 ±2.87 17.24† ±3.34 16.55 ±3.15 D4L 16.12† ±2.84 15.77 ±3.1 17.13† ±3.00 16.84 ±3.29 D5R 7.71† ±1.84 7.37† ±1.76 8.47† ±2.05 8.19† ±1.85 D5L 7.60† ±1.84 7.26 ±2.02 8.54† ±2.32 7.86 ±1.65 D6R 14.13† ±2.34 14.03† ±2.23 15.9† ±2.67 15.73† ±2.77 D6L 14.07† ±2.35 14.29† ±2.14 15.99† ±2.91 15.91† ±2.42 D7R 44.65† ±3.16 43.78† ±3.56 49.21† ±4.11 47.75† ±3.76 D7L 44.63† ±3.28 43.87† ±3.15 49.44†a ±3.87 47.93†a ±3.69 S t a t i s t i c a l l y   a significant difference between age groups. Statistically† significant difference between sexes. RightR. LeftL


#### 3.1.1. Analysis between Age Groups

When distances D1 to D7 in females were compared between age groups and left/right sides, no statistically significant differences were found, except for D2, where the mean value was observed to be greater in females aged 18-35 years.In males, distance D3 on both sides and distance D7 on the left side presented significantly greater values in individuals aged 18-34 years.


#### 3.1.2. Analysis by Sex

Statistical differences were found between males and females aged 18-34 years for all the distances, with males presenting greater mean values than females on both sides.In the 35-and-over age group, statistical differences were found between males and females for the distances D1, D2, D6, and D7 on both sides and D5 on the right side, with males presenting greater mean values than females.When the complete sample was analysed, a significant difference between males and females was observed for all distances (p ≤0.01), with males presenting greater mean values than females.


#### 3.1.3. Correlation between Distances

A moderate positive correlation was found between distances D6xD7, D1xD5, and D3xD5. D1, D4, and D6 presented moderate positive correlation between left and right sides, while D2, D3, D5, and D7 presented a high positive correlation between left and right sides. The correlations between the distances are given in Table2.Table 2
Correlation between distances, by sex and age group. Separate information by side is presented where there are significant differences.
Sex/age Females18-34 years Females≥35 years Males18-34 years Males≥35 years Distances measured below the mandibular canal D1 x D3 0.29∗ 0.01 0.32∗ 0.12 D1 x D5 0.39∗ 0.33∗ 0.41∗ 0.34 D3 x D5 0.71∗ 0.46∗ 0.52∗ 0.61∗  Distances measured above the mandibular canal D2 x D4 0.10∗ 0.19 0.10 0.23 D2 x D6 0.08 0.13 0.03 0.06 D4 x D6 0.20∗ 0.18 0.21 0.16  Distances measured along the same vertical line D1R x D2R -0.07 -0.02 -0.29∗ 0.06∗ D1L x D2L -0.32∗ -0.01∗ D3R x D4R -0.38∗ -0.50∗ -0.38∗ -0.25∗ D3L x D4L -0.42∗ D6R x D7R 0.51∗ 0.58∗ 0.54∗ 0.68∗ D6L x D7L 0.32∗ 0.64∗ 0.33∗ S t a t i s t i c a l l y   ∗ significant.


### 3.2. Relation between the Mandibular Canal and the Roots of the Inferior Teeth (MCR)

There was no statistically significant difference in the MCR between sides. In both males and females the mandibular canal was most commonly close to the third molar. In males the second most common relation was no proximity between the mandibular canal and roots, while for females the second most common relation was proximity between the mandibular canal and all roots, with statistically significant differences (p ≤0.01). The percentages for females and males aged 18-34 years are presented in Table 3; no data are shown for males ≥35 years because the sample was not significant.Table 3
Percentage for each mandibular canal relation type with inferior roots, considering sex, side, and age group.
Females (18-34 years) Females (≥35 years) Males (18-34 years) Right Left Right Left Right Left Type 1 72.9% 72.9% 68.8% 62.5% 80.9% 75% Type 2 7.3% 5.2% 18.8% 18.8% 12.8% 12% Type 3 19.8% 21.9% 12.5% 18.8% 6.4% 7%


### 3.3. MF Position

Table4 shows the percentages found for each MF type by sex, side and age group. A significant difference was found in MF position percentages by side among males aged ≥35 years, with Type 3 more frequent on the left side and Type 4 on the right. No statistical differences were found between sexes for the position of the MF.Table 4
Percentage of each mental foramen position type on the right and left sides for males and females in age groups 18-34 years and ≥35 years.
Sex, side and age group Mental foramen Position Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5 FemalesR (18-34 years) 2.1% 3.2% 54.0% 35.3% 5.3% FemalesL (18-34 years) 4.3% 1.6% 54.0% 36.4% 3.7% FemalesR (≥35 years) 0.0% 2.9% 35.3% 45.7% 17.1% FemalesL (≥35 years) 1.4% 2.9% 32.9% 45.7% 17.1% MalesR (18-34 years) 0.7% 4.3% 50.4% 36.2% 8.5% MalesL (18-34 years) 3.5% 3.5% 48.9% 39% 5.0% MalesR (≥35 years) 5.7% 11.4% 20.0% 54.3% 8.6% MalesL (≥35 years) 2.9% 0.0% 42.9% 45.7% 8.6% R i g h t   R side. LeftL side.


## 3.1. Linear Measurements D1-D7

The mean values for D1-D7 are given in Table1, distributed by sex, side, and age group.Table 1
Mean value (in millimetres) and standard deviation (SD) of distances D1 to D7 on the right and left sides for males and females in age groups 18-34 years and ≥35 years.
Distances Females (18-34 years) Females (≥35 years) Males (18-34 years) Males (≥35 years) Average SD Average SD Average SD Average SD D1R 11.33† ±1.43 11.56† ±1.32 12.85† ±1.86 12.82† ±1.34 D1L 11.37† ±1.54 11.63† ±1.67 13.10† ±1.95 13.02† ±1.32 D2R 15.83a† ±2.1 14.91a† ±1.96 17.19† ±2.63 16.56† ±2.46 D2L 15.76† ±2.25 15.19† ±2.15 16.80† ±2.32 16.39† ±1.98 D3R 8.11† ±2.22 7.84 ±1.82 9.03†a ±2.37 8.04a ±2.33 D3L 7.78† ±2.04 7.55 ±2.16 8.60†a ±2.16 7.77a ±1.98 D4R 16.03† ±2.95 15.52 ±2.87 17.24† ±3.34 16.55 ±3.15 D4L 16.12† ±2.84 15.77 ±3.1 17.13† ±3.00 16.84 ±3.29 D5R 7.71† ±1.84 7.37† ±1.76 8.47† ±2.05 8.19† ±1.85 D5L 7.60† ±1.84 7.26 ±2.02 8.54† ±2.32 7.86 ±1.65 D6R 14.13† ±2.34 14.03† ±2.23 15.9† ±2.67 15.73† ±2.77 D6L 14.07† ±2.35 14.29† ±2.14 15.99† ±2.91 15.91† ±2.42 D7R 44.65† ±3.16 43.78† ±3.56 49.21† ±4.11 47.75† ±3.76 D7L 44.63† ±3.28 43.87† ±3.15 49.44†a ±3.87 47.93†a ±3.69 S t a t i s t i c a l l y   a significant difference between age groups. Statistically† significant difference between sexes. RightR. LeftL


### 3.1.1. Analysis between Age Groups

When distances D1 to D7 in females were compared between age groups and left/right sides, no statistically significant differences were found, except for D2, where the mean value was observed to be greater in females aged 18-35 years.In males, distance D3 on both sides and distance D7 on the left side presented significantly greater values in individuals aged 18-34 years.


### 3.1.2. Analysis by Sex

Statistical differences were found between males and females aged 18-34 years for all the distances, with males presenting greater mean values than females on both sides.In the 35-and-over age group, statistical differences were found between males and females for the distances D1, D2, D6, and D7 on both sides and D5 on the right side, with males presenting greater mean values than females.When the complete sample was analysed, a significant difference between males and females was observed for all distances (p ≤0.01), with males presenting greater mean values than females.


### 3.1.3. Correlation between Distances

A moderate positive correlation was found between distances D6xD7, D1xD5, and D3xD5. D1, D4, and D6 presented moderate positive correlation between left and right sides, while D2, D3, D5, and D7 presented a high positive correlation between left and right sides. The correlations between the distances are given in Table2.Table 2
Correlation between distances, by sex and age group. Separate information by side is presented where there are significant differences.
Sex/age Females18-34 years Females≥35 years Males18-34 years Males≥35 years Distances measured below the mandibular canal D1 x D3 0.29∗ 0.01 0.32∗ 0.12 D1 x D5 0.39∗ 0.33∗ 0.41∗ 0.34 D3 x D5 0.71∗ 0.46∗ 0.52∗ 0.61∗  Distances measured above the mandibular canal D2 x D4 0.10∗ 0.19 0.10 0.23 D2 x D6 0.08 0.13 0.03 0.06 D4 x D6 0.20∗ 0.18 0.21 0.16  Distances measured along the same vertical line D1R x D2R -0.07 -0.02 -0.29∗ 0.06∗ D1L x D2L -0.32∗ -0.01∗ D3R x D4R -0.38∗ -0.50∗ -0.38∗ -0.25∗ D3L x D4L -0.42∗ D6R x D7R 0.51∗ 0.58∗ 0.54∗ 0.68∗ D6L x D7L 0.32∗ 0.64∗ 0.33∗ S t a t i s t i c a l l y   ∗ significant.


## 3.1.1. Analysis between Age Groups

When distances D1 to D7 in females were compared between age groups and left/right sides, no statistically significant differences were found, except for D2, where the mean value was observed to be greater in females aged 18-35 years.In males, distance D3 on both sides and distance D7 on the left side presented significantly greater values in individuals aged 18-34 years.


## 3.1.2. Analysis by Sex

Statistical differences were found between males and females aged 18-34 years for all the distances, with males presenting greater mean values than females on both sides.In the 35-and-over age group, statistical differences were found between males and females for the distances D1, D2, D6, and D7 on both sides and D5 on the right side, with males presenting greater mean values than females.When the complete sample was analysed, a significant difference between males and females was observed for all distances (p ≤0.01), with males presenting greater mean values than females.


## 3.1.3. Correlation between Distances

A moderate positive correlation was found between distances D6xD7, D1xD5, and D3xD5. D1, D4, and D6 presented moderate positive correlation between left and right sides, while D2, D3, D5, and D7 presented a high positive correlation between left and right sides. The correlations between the distances are given in Table2.Table 2
Correlation between distances, by sex and age group. Separate information by side is presented where there are significant differences.
Sex/age Females18-34 years Females≥35 years Males18-34 years Males≥35 years Distances measured below the mandibular canal D1 x D3 0.29∗ 0.01 0.32∗ 0.12 D1 x D5 0.39∗ 0.33∗ 0.41∗ 0.34 D3 x D5 0.71∗ 0.46∗ 0.52∗ 0.61∗  Distances measured above the mandibular canal D2 x D4 0.10∗ 0.19 0.10 0.23 D2 x D6 0.08 0.13 0.03 0.06 D4 x D6 0.20∗ 0.18 0.21 0.16  Distances measured along the same vertical line D1R x D2R -0.07 -0.02 -0.29∗ 0.06∗ D1L x D2L -0.32∗ -0.01∗ D3R x D4R -0.38∗ -0.50∗ -0.38∗ -0.25∗ D3L x D4L -0.42∗ D6R x D7R 0.51∗ 0.58∗ 0.54∗ 0.68∗ D6L x D7L 0.32∗ 0.64∗ 0.33∗ S t a t i s t i c a l l y   ∗ significant.


## 3.2. Relation between the Mandibular Canal and the Roots of the Inferior Teeth (MCR)

There was no statistically significant difference in the MCR between sides. In both males and females the mandibular canal was most commonly close to the third molar. In males the second most common relation was no proximity between the mandibular canal and roots, while for females the second most common relation was proximity between the mandibular canal and all roots, with statistically significant differences (p ≤0.01). The percentages for females and males aged 18-34 years are presented in Table 3; no data are shown for males ≥35 years because the sample was not significant.Table 3
Percentage for each mandibular canal relation type with inferior roots, considering sex, side, and age group.
Females (18-34 years) Females (≥35 years) Males (18-34 years) Right Left Right Left Right Left Type 1 72.9% 72.9% 68.8% 62.5% 80.9% 75% Type 2 7.3% 5.2% 18.8% 18.8% 12.8% 12% Type 3 19.8% 21.9% 12.5% 18.8% 6.4% 7%


## 3.3. MF Position

Table4 shows the percentages found for each MF type by sex, side and age group. A significant difference was found in MF position percentages by side among males aged ≥35 years, with Type 3 more frequent on the left side and Type 4 on the right. No statistical differences were found between sexes for the position of the MF.Table 4
Percentage of each mental foramen position type on the right and left sides for males and females in age groups 18-34 years and ≥35 years.
Sex, side and age group Mental foramen Position Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5 FemalesR (18-34 years) 2.1% 3.2% 54.0% 35.3% 5.3% FemalesL (18-34 years) 4.3% 1.6% 54.0% 36.4% 3.7% FemalesR (≥35 years) 0.0% 2.9% 35.3% 45.7% 17.1% FemalesL (≥35 years) 1.4% 2.9% 32.9% 45.7% 17.1% MalesR (18-34 years) 0.7% 4.3% 50.4% 36.2% 8.5% MalesL (18-34 years) 3.5% 3.5% 48.9% 39% 5.0% MalesR (≥35 years) 5.7% 11.4% 20.0% 54.3% 8.6% MalesL (≥35 years) 2.9% 0.0% 42.9% 45.7% 8.6% R i g h t   R side. LeftL side.


## 4. Discussion

PAN is a quick, simple, and low-cost imaging technique requiring a low radiation dose. It is widely used in dentistry for diagnosis and presurgery planning [18–20]. X-ray interpretation is sometimes complicated due to the superimposition of anatomical structures [21], since the image is two-dimensional and subject to a degree of inaccuracy [18–20]. According to Kim et al. [22], PAN presents ±10% accuracy for linear measurements and morphological assessments. Muinelo-Lorenzo et al. [23] state that only 83.87% of the MF found by Cone-Beam computerised tomography are also observed in PAN; however other studies say that 100% of MF can be observed in PAN [24–26].


### 4.1. Analysis of Distances D1-D7

In this research, the distance from the MF to the base of mandible (D1) was shorter than the distance from the MF to the alveolar ridge, showing that the MF is closer to the base of mandible; this corroborates earlier studies [10, 12, 13, 27]. Furthermore, in females aged 35 or over and in males aged between 18 and 34 years, a negative correlation was observed between distances, corroborating the above finding. Alves [28] carried out a study in macerated mandibles of individuals with different degrees of edentulism and observed that the MF presented closest to the alveolar ridge in edentate mandibles, followed by mandibles with posterior edentation, and finally dentate mandibles; this shows that alveolar resorption can lead to a change in MF location in the mandible, bringing it closer to the alveolar ridge, leading in turn to a higher risk of complications for procedures in this region. In the present study, we found symmetry and marked difference between genders for these two distances, which are greater in males than in females, which corroborates previous studies [9, 11, 12, 14, 15]. Due to the marked gender difference, distances D1 and D2 are powerful indicators which can be used to determine the sex of individuals [12]. Age had no major impact on distances D1 and D2; an age group effect was only found for distance D2 on the right side, which was greater in younger females. The D1 value in our study of Chilean individuals was similar to that reported for Brazilian [10, 16] and Indian [11, 12, 15] individuals, greater than that reported for Iraqis [13, 14], and less than another study in Brazilians [9] (Table 5). Distance D2 was greater in Brazilian [10, 16] and Indian [12] individuals and similar in Iraqis [13] when compared to the present sample of Chilean individuals (Table 5). It bears noting that knowledge of MF location in relation to the inferior border of the mandible, the alveolar ridge, and adjacent teeth is important for avoiding lesions to the mental nerve during procedures in the region, such as genioplasty, apical curettage in the inferior premolar area, surgical extractions, dental implants, mandibular fracture fixation, and periodontal surgery [29]. Furthermore, correct MF location helps in precise nervous blocking, avoiding complications due to nerve lesions [29].Table 5
Mean values (mm) for distances D1-D7 reported in the literature and in the present study.
Author Sample Origin Age Side D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F Almeida Filho et al. [9] 35 65 Brazil ≥18 R 17.80 16.38 - - - - - - - - - - - - L 17.51 16.18 - - - - - - - - - - - -  Amorimet al. [10] 101 199 Brazil 18-40 - 11.81 10.75 18.54 17.14 8.93 8.49 14.71 14.08 6.94 6.86 24.92 23.10 50.12 46.91 ≥40 - 11.91 10.62 17.44 16.53 8.80 8.74 - 12.45 7.32 6.87 25.07 23.74 48.52 45.41  Chandraet al. [11] 100 India 18-62 R 12.67 11.46 - - - - - - - - - - - - L 12.58 11.25 - - - - - - - - - - - -  Ghouseet al. [12] 60 India 20-49 R 13.73 18.79 - - - - - - 15.72 56.58 L 13.79 18.07 - - - - - - 16.27 56.68 20 20 20-29 - 14.47 13.60 18.57 18.31 - - - - - - 19.22 19.75 55.08 51.63 20 20 30-39 - 14.94 12.60 18.40 18.85 - - - - - - 16.09 15.12 65.38 60.98 20 20 40-49 14.56 12.38 19.48 16.97 - - - - - - 13.65 12.14 56.66 50.36  Rashid andAli [13, 14] 50 50 Irak 20-29 - 9.63 8.81 17.80 15.95 - - - - - - 25.53 23.36 50.90 46.52 50 50 30-39 - 10.60 9.84 17.88 16.82 - - - - - - 24.92 23.19 50.31 46.17 50 50 40-49 - 9.96 9.07 16.65 15.27 - - - - - - 24.81 23.08 49.91 45.86 300 - R 9.63 16.87 9.34 15.27 - - 24.15 48.28 300 - L 9.68 16.89 9.3 15.33 - - 24.16 48.29  Jayamet al. [15] 25 25 India 20-30 - 13.04 12.62 - - - - - - 7.50 7.28 - - - - 25 25 30-40 - 13.93 14.51 - - - - - - 7.84 7.70 - - - -  Simpson et al.[16] 21 Brazil ≥18 R 13.42 19.10 - - - - 8.42 18.96 - - L 13.42 18.89 - - - - 7.78 18.46 - -  Presentstudy 191 1ç Chile 18-34 R 12.85 11.33 17.19 15.83 9.03 8.11 17.24 16.03 8.47 7.71 15.9 14.13 49.21 44.65 45 L 13.10 11.37 16.80 15.76 8.60 7.78 17.13 16.12 8.54 7.60 15.99 14.07 49.44 44.63 71 35 ≥35 R 12.82 11.56 16.56 14.91 8.04 7.84 16.55 15.52 8.19 7.37 15.73 14.03 47.75 43.78 L 13.02 11.63 16.39 15.19 7.77 7.55 16.84 15.77 7.86 7.26 15.91 14.29 47.93 43.87 M: males, F: females; R: right; L: left.Males presented larger mean values for distances D3, D4, and D5, with significant gender differences. D3 was slightly larger in younger males than in those aged 35 or over, in contrast to findings among females; other authors have reported higher values in males [13]; however they did not carry out analysis by age group. In the present study, distance D3 was fairly similar to measurements found by other authors in Brazilian and Iraqi individuals [10, 13]. The mean value for D5 in our sample was similar to that found by de Paula et al. [16] in Brazilians and by Jayam et al. [15] in Indians and greater than in Amorim et al. [10] in Brazilians (Table 5). In the present study, distances D3 and D5 presented a moderate to high positive correlation, suggesting that mandibular canal curvature increases or decreases proportionally in those two regions. D4 in our study was higher than the values found in Brazilian [10] and Iraqi individuals [13]. We observed that both D3 and D4 presented important gender differences in younger individuals, with greater values in males than in females; this finding disagrees with earlier studies [10, 13]. The low to moderate negative correlation between these two distances suggests a variation in MC course, since when one of the distances increases, the other decreases; when D4 decreases and D3 increases, MC is positioned closer to the inferior third molar root.The mandibular foramen is the opening through which the inferior alveolar vasculonervous bundle enters the mandibular canal [1]. The mandibular foramen position is used as a parameter for safe interventions involving the mandibular ramus region, including surgery and anaesthesia [30], and this helps reduce complications due to inferior alveolar vasculonervous bundle lesions [31]. In a study of macerated mandibles in Brazilian individuals, Alves and Deana [32] performed morphological analysis of the mandibular lingula superoinferior position, an anatomical structure which forms the medial limit of the mandibular foramen [1]. They reported that the lingula was located in the superior or middle third of the ramus, 1 mm away from the intersection line of these two-thirds. Fontoura et al. [33] carried out a study of macerated mandibles and X-rays to determine the mandibular foramen location and concluded that it is located almost completely in the middle third of the mandibular ramus. According to Trost et al. [34] the posterior and superior thirds of the mandibular ramus constitute a “safety zone” where the mandibular foramen is unlikely to be located. However some anatomical variations, such as the accessory mandibular foramen [35] or superior location of the mandibular foramen being very close to the mandibular notch [36], may increase inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) complication risks [35]; it is therefore essential to plan properly before carrying out interventions in the region, and panoramic X-ray can be a useful tool for correctly locating important structures such as the mandibular foramen. In our study, distance D6, the vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular notch to the mandibular foramen, was shorter than that reported by Amorim et al. [10] and de Paula et al. [16] in their studies in Brazil, than Ghouse et al. [12] in India and Rashid and Ali [13] in Iraq. Distance D6 was significantly greater in males than in females [10, 12, 13, 16] and is considered an important measurement for determining sex [12]. It should be noted that the mean values found for D6 in Chileans were significantly smaller than those reported for Brazilian [10] and Iraqi individuals [13, 14] and closer to those reported for Indians [12] (Table 5). In the present study, we found no age-related differences, showing that the mandibular foramen does not change its position vertically with age and corroborating other studies [12, 13, 37]. However, we note that previous studies in macerated mandibles did find an association between age and mandibular foramen location, with a more superior location found in younger males compared to older males and a more posterior location found in younger females compared to older females [35]. Sex, age, and ethnic group must be considered in surgical interventions or anaesthetic blocking, in order to reduce complication risks in this region [32, 35].Based on our study we can state that distance D7 presented a marked gender difference, since values found for males were expressively greater than for females, corroborating previous studies [10, 12, 14]; this is an important measurement for determining sex [12, 14]. The mean values found for D7 in our study were smaller than those found for Brazilians [10], Indians [12], and Iraqis [13] (Table 5). In males we found differences between age groups, with greater values among younger individuals than in older groups, disagreeing with other studies [10]. A moderate positive correlation was found between D6 and D7 in all groups and sides, except on the left side in older males and females. The correlation between these two measurements suggests that distances from mandibular foramen to the mandibular notch and mandibular ramus height tend to increase or decrease proportionally, while the mandibular foramen remains in the same general position.


### 4.2. Relation between Mandibular Canal and Roots (MCR)

Variations in mandibular canal course are very frequent [2], and locating them is necessary to avoid lesions to the inferior alveolar nerve in procedures such as dental implants, dental anaesthesia, and mandibular osteotomy [38]. The MC is generally in contact with the inferior third molar alveolus base, and its distance from root apices of the other teeth increases gradually, as corroborated by the present work and previous studies [1, 10, 14]. The inferior alveolar vasculonervous bundle passes through the MC [1], and IAN proximity to the inferior third molar root is associated with neurosensorial complications after surgery to extract the inferior third molar [39]. According to Valmaseda-Castellón et al. [40], the radiologic relationship between third molar roots and the mandibular canal increases the risk of damage to the IAN, which may have a marked impact on quality of life [41], through paresthesia or anaesthesia in the inferior lip, chin, and buccal gingivae [40]. The risk of IAN deficit is increased in inferior third molar surgery when its impaction is horizontal, as compared to other impaction types [42]. Furthermore, impaction degree is also a factor which aggravates the risk of nervous lesions [42, 43]. In the present study, we observed that MCR was not affected by gender, agreeing with studies by Amorim et al. [10], Rashid and Ali [14], and Falkine et al. [44] and corroborating results in Cheung et al. [39], who found no association between sex and increased risk of IAN lesion in third molar surgery. Furthermore, in our study we found no association between age and MCR, corroborating previous studies [10]; however it must be noted that the literature is contradictory with respect to increased risk associated with age, since some studies have reported that age is a determinant for increased risk of IAN lesion [45] and patient morbidity during surgery [46], while other authors report no such findings [39, 40].No-proximity relation between the mandibular canal and roots (Type 2) presented a lower percentage than Type 1, but higher than Type 3, with 12% on the right side and 12.9% on the left, which agrees with findings by Amorim et al. [10] for individuals aged up to 40.Proximity relation between the mandibular canal and all roots (Type 3) was the least frequent in our study, with 11.2% on the right side and 12.5% on the left. Falkine et al. [44] found that this mandibular canal type was the second most frequent in their study population.


### 4.3. MF Position

MF is a very frequent anatomical structure, of great clinical importance. Knowledge of its anatomy is essential for avoiding complications during clinical and surgical procedures in this region [47]. In a literature review, Ceballos et al. [47] reported that MF was present in 95.2% of PANs analysed, being observed more frequently on the left side than the right. Furthermore, these authors stated that the MF is located between inferior premolar apices in 42.22% of cases, coincides with inferior second premolar roots in 33.98%, and is distal to the inferior second premolar root in 10.98% of PANs [47]. In a study performed with Chilean individuals, Fuentes et al. [48] found that MF was located on the longitudinal axis of the second premolar on the right side and between longitudinal axes of the first and second premolars on the left side; in our study, also in Chilean individuals, we found differences between sides only for males aged 35 or over, in which the MF was located between premolar roots on the right side and coincident with the second premolar on the left. In young individuals (18-30 years) in the United Kingdom, the most common MF position was between the first and second premolar apices [24], similar to our study for individuals of both sexes aged 18 to 34. The same position was found to be most common in other populations: Iraqi [7], Asiatic [25], Korean [49], and Indian [50]. In our study, the most common location in individuals aged 35 or over was immediately below the inferior second premolar apex, coinciding with other populations: Moroccan [51], Spanish [23], and Indian [50, 52]. No differences between sexes were found in MF position, corroborating previous studies [24, 26, 53]. The other three positions recurred less frequently; in the present study, Type 1 frequency ranged from 5.7% to 0%, Type 2 from 11.4 to 0%, and Type 5 from 17.1% to 3.7%. Amorim et al. [37] reported similar results, with values generally below 10%, except for Type 5 in F2, which reached 13.16%. Considerably lower percentages were reported by Almeida et al. [9], who found that Types 1 and 2 represented only 5% and 1% of cases, respectively, while no case of Type 5 was found.


## 4.1. Analysis of Distances D1-D7

In this research, the distance from the MF to the base of mandible (D1) was shorter than the distance from the MF to the alveolar ridge, showing that the MF is closer to the base of mandible; this corroborates earlier studies [10, 12, 13, 27]. Furthermore, in females aged 35 or over and in males aged between 18 and 34 years, a negative correlation was observed between distances, corroborating the above finding. Alves [28] carried out a study in macerated mandibles of individuals with different degrees of edentulism and observed that the MF presented closest to the alveolar ridge in edentate mandibles, followed by mandibles with posterior edentation, and finally dentate mandibles; this shows that alveolar resorption can lead to a change in MF location in the mandible, bringing it closer to the alveolar ridge, leading in turn to a higher risk of complications for procedures in this region. In the present study, we found symmetry and marked difference between genders for these two distances, which are greater in males than in females, which corroborates previous studies [9, 11, 12, 14, 15]. Due to the marked gender difference, distances D1 and D2 are powerful indicators which can be used to determine the sex of individuals [12]. Age had no major impact on distances D1 and D2; an age group effect was only found for distance D2 on the right side, which was greater in younger females. The D1 value in our study of Chilean individuals was similar to that reported for Brazilian [10, 16] and Indian [11, 12, 15] individuals, greater than that reported for Iraqis [13, 14], and less than another study in Brazilians [9] (Table 5). Distance D2 was greater in Brazilian [10, 16] and Indian [12] individuals and similar in Iraqis [13] when compared to the present sample of Chilean individuals (Table 5). It bears noting that knowledge of MF location in relation to the inferior border of the mandible, the alveolar ridge, and adjacent teeth is important for avoiding lesions to the mental nerve during procedures in the region, such as genioplasty, apical curettage in the inferior premolar area, surgical extractions, dental implants, mandibular fracture fixation, and periodontal surgery [29]. Furthermore, correct MF location helps in precise nervous blocking, avoiding complications due to nerve lesions [29].Table 5
Mean values (mm) for distances D1-D7 reported in the literature and in the present study.
Author Sample Origin Age Side D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F Almeida Filho et al. [9] 35 65 Brazil ≥18 R 17.80 16.38 - - - - - - - - - - - - L 17.51 16.18 - - - - - - - - - - - -  Amorimet al. [10] 101 199 Brazil 18-40 - 11.81 10.75 18.54 17.14 8.93 8.49 14.71 14.08 6.94 6.86 24.92 23.10 50.12 46.91 ≥40 - 11.91 10.62 17.44 16.53 8.80 8.74 - 12.45 7.32 6.87 25.07 23.74 48.52 45.41  Chandraet al. [11] 100 India 18-62 R 12.67 11.46 - - - - - - - - - - - - L 12.58 11.25 - - - - - - - - - - - -  Ghouseet al. [12] 60 India 20-49 R 13.73 18.79 - - - - - - 15.72 56.58 L 13.79 18.07 - - - - - - 16.27 56.68 20 20 20-29 - 14.47 13.60 18.57 18.31 - - - - - - 19.22 19.75 55.08 51.63 20 20 30-39 - 14.94 12.60 18.40 18.85 - - - - - - 16.09 15.12 65.38 60.98 20 20 40-49 14.56 12.38 19.48 16.97 - - - - - - 13.65 12.14 56.66 50.36  Rashid andAli [13, 14] 50 50 Irak 20-29 - 9.63 8.81 17.80 15.95 - - - - - - 25.53 23.36 50.90 46.52 50 50 30-39 - 10.60 9.84 17.88 16.82 - - - - - - 24.92 23.19 50.31 46.17 50 50 40-49 - 9.96 9.07 16.65 15.27 - - - - - - 24.81 23.08 49.91 45.86 300 - R 9.63 16.87 9.34 15.27 - - 24.15 48.28 300 - L 9.68 16.89 9.3 15.33 - - 24.16 48.29  Jayamet al. [15] 25 25 India 20-30 - 13.04 12.62 - - - - - - 7.50 7.28 - - - - 25 25 30-40 - 13.93 14.51 - - - - - - 7.84 7.70 - - - -  Simpson et al.[16] 21 Brazil ≥18 R 13.42 19.10 - - - - 8.42 18.96 - - L 13.42 18.89 - - - - 7.78 18.46 - -  Presentstudy 191 1ç Chile 18-34 R 12.85 11.33 17.19 15.83 9.03 8.11 17.24 16.03 8.47 7.71 15.9 14.13 49.21 44.65 45 L 13.10 11.37 16.80 15.76 8.60 7.78 17.13 16.12 8.54 7.60 15.99 14.07 49.44 44.63 71 35 ≥35 R 12.82 11.56 16.56 14.91 8.04 7.84 16.55 15.52 8.19 7.37 15.73 14.03 47.75 43.78 L 13.02 11.63 16.39 15.19 7.77 7.55 16.84 15.77 7.86 7.26 15.91 14.29 47.93 43.87 M: males, F: females; R: right; L: left.Males presented larger mean values for distances D3, D4, and D5, with significant gender differences. D3 was slightly larger in younger males than in those aged 35 or over, in contrast to findings among females; other authors have reported higher values in males [13]; however they did not carry out analysis by age group. In the present study, distance D3 was fairly similar to measurements found by other authors in Brazilian and Iraqi individuals [10, 13]. The mean value for D5 in our sample was similar to that found by de Paula et al. [16] in Brazilians and by Jayam et al. [15] in Indians and greater than in Amorim et al. [10] in Brazilians (Table 5). In the present study, distances D3 and D5 presented a moderate to high positive correlation, suggesting that mandibular canal curvature increases or decreases proportionally in those two regions. D4 in our study was higher than the values found in Brazilian [10] and Iraqi individuals [13]. We observed that both D3 and D4 presented important gender differences in younger individuals, with greater values in males than in females; this finding disagrees with earlier studies [10, 13]. The low to moderate negative correlation between these two distances suggests a variation in MC course, since when one of the distances increases, the other decreases; when D4 decreases and D3 increases, MC is positioned closer to the inferior third molar root.The mandibular foramen is the opening through which the inferior alveolar vasculonervous bundle enters the mandibular canal [1]. The mandibular foramen position is used as a parameter for safe interventions involving the mandibular ramus region, including surgery and anaesthesia [30], and this helps reduce complications due to inferior alveolar vasculonervous bundle lesions [31]. In a study of macerated mandibles in Brazilian individuals, Alves and Deana [32] performed morphological analysis of the mandibular lingula superoinferior position, an anatomical structure which forms the medial limit of the mandibular foramen [1]. They reported that the lingula was located in the superior or middle third of the ramus, 1 mm away from the intersection line of these two-thirds. Fontoura et al. [33] carried out a study of macerated mandibles and X-rays to determine the mandibular foramen location and concluded that it is located almost completely in the middle third of the mandibular ramus. According to Trost et al. [34] the posterior and superior thirds of the mandibular ramus constitute a “safety zone” where the mandibular foramen is unlikely to be located. However some anatomical variations, such as the accessory mandibular foramen [35] or superior location of the mandibular foramen being very close to the mandibular notch [36], may increase inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) complication risks [35]; it is therefore essential to plan properly before carrying out interventions in the region, and panoramic X-ray can be a useful tool for correctly locating important structures such as the mandibular foramen. In our study, distance D6, the vertical distance from the lowest point of the mandibular notch to the mandibular foramen, was shorter than that reported by Amorim et al. [10] and de Paula et al. [16] in their studies in Brazil, than Ghouse et al. [12] in India and Rashid and Ali [13] in Iraq. Distance D6 was significantly greater in males than in females [10, 12, 13, 16] and is considered an important measurement for determining sex [12]. It should be noted that the mean values found for D6 in Chileans were significantly smaller than those reported for Brazilian [10] and Iraqi individuals [13, 14] and closer to those reported for Indians [12] (Table 5). In the present study, we found no age-related differences, showing that the mandibular foramen does not change its position vertically with age and corroborating other studies [12, 13, 37]. However, we note that previous studies in macerated mandibles did find an association between age and mandibular foramen location, with a more superior location found in younger males compared to older males and a more posterior location found in younger females compared to older females [35]. Sex, age, and ethnic group must be considered in surgical interventions or anaesthetic blocking, in order to reduce complication risks in this region [32, 35].Based on our study we can state that distance D7 presented a marked gender difference, since values found for males were expressively greater than for females, corroborating previous studies [10, 12, 14]; this is an important measurement for determining sex [12, 14]. The mean values found for D7 in our study were smaller than those found for Brazilians [10], Indians [12], and Iraqis [13] (Table 5). In males we found differences between age groups, with greater values among younger individuals than in older groups, disagreeing with other studies [10]. A moderate positive correlation was found between D6 and D7 in all groups and sides, except on the left side in older males and females. The correlation between these two measurements suggests that distances from mandibular foramen to the mandibular notch and mandibular ramus height tend to increase or decrease proportionally, while the mandibular foramen remains in the same general position.


## 4.2. Relation between Mandibular Canal and Roots (MCR)

Variations in mandibular canal course are very frequent [2], and locating them is necessary to avoid lesions to the inferior alveolar nerve in procedures such as dental implants, dental anaesthesia, and mandibular osteotomy [38]. The MC is generally in contact with the inferior third molar alveolus base, and its distance from root apices of the other teeth increases gradually, as corroborated by the present work and previous studies [1, 10, 14]. The inferior alveolar vasculonervous bundle passes through the MC [1], and IAN proximity to the inferior third molar root is associated with neurosensorial complications after surgery to extract the inferior third molar [39]. According to Valmaseda-Castellón et al. [40], the radiologic relationship between third molar roots and the mandibular canal increases the risk of damage to the IAN, which may have a marked impact on quality of life [41], through paresthesia or anaesthesia in the inferior lip, chin, and buccal gingivae [40]. The risk of IAN deficit is increased in inferior third molar surgery when its impaction is horizontal, as compared to other impaction types [42]. Furthermore, impaction degree is also a factor which aggravates the risk of nervous lesions [42, 43]. In the present study, we observed that MCR was not affected by gender, agreeing with studies by Amorim et al. [10], Rashid and Ali [14], and Falkine et al. [44] and corroborating results in Cheung et al. [39], who found no association between sex and increased risk of IAN lesion in third molar surgery. Furthermore, in our study we found no association between age and MCR, corroborating previous studies [10]; however it must be noted that the literature is contradictory with respect to increased risk associated with age, since some studies have reported that age is a determinant for increased risk of IAN lesion [45] and patient morbidity during surgery [46], while other authors report no such findings [39, 40].No-proximity relation between the mandibular canal and roots (Type 2) presented a lower percentage than Type 1, but higher than Type 3, with 12% on the right side and 12.9% on the left, which agrees with findings by Amorim et al. [10] for individuals aged up to 40.Proximity relation between the mandibular canal and all roots (Type 3) was the least frequent in our study, with 11.2% on the right side and 12.5% on the left. Falkine et al. [44] found that this mandibular canal type was the second most frequent in their study population.


## 4.3. MF Position

MF is a very frequent anatomical structure, of great clinical importance. Knowledge of its anatomy is essential for avoiding complications during clinical and surgical procedures in this region [47]. In a literature review, Ceballos et al. [47] reported that MF was present in 95.2% of PANs analysed, being observed more frequently on the left side than the right. Furthermore, these authors stated that the MF is located between inferior premolar apices in 42.22% of cases, coincides with inferior second premolar roots in 33.98%, and is distal to the inferior second premolar root in 10.98% of PANs [47]. In a study performed with Chilean individuals, Fuentes et al. [48] found that MF was located on the longitudinal axis of the second premolar on the right side and between longitudinal axes of the first and second premolars on the left side; in our study, also in Chilean individuals, we found differences between sides only for males aged 35 or over, in which the MF was located between premolar roots on the right side and coincident with the second premolar on the left. In young individuals (18-30 years) in the United Kingdom, the most common MF position was between the first and second premolar apices [24], similar to our study for individuals of both sexes aged 18 to 34. The same position was found to be most common in other populations: Iraqi [7], Asiatic [25], Korean [49], and Indian [50]. In our study, the most common location in individuals aged 35 or over was immediately below the inferior second premolar apex, coinciding with other populations: Moroccan [51], Spanish [23], and Indian [50, 52]. No differences between sexes were found in MF position, corroborating previous studies [24, 26, 53]. The other three positions recurred less frequently; in the present study, Type 1 frequency ranged from 5.7% to 0%, Type 2 from 11.4 to 0%, and Type 5 from 17.1% to 3.7%. Amorim et al. [37] reported similar results, with values generally below 10%, except for Type 5 in F2, which reached 13.16%. Considerably lower percentages were reported by Almeida et al. [9], who found that Types 1 and 2 represented only 5% and 1% of cases, respectively, while no case of Type 5 was found.


## 5. Conclusions

The MF is generally located between the first and second premolar apices in younger individuals and immediately below the inferior second premolar apex in older individuals. The MC presented proximity to the third molar, and this relation was not affected by sex or age group. Distances analysed in this study presented symmetry and marked gender differences, with larger values found in males than in females. However, age did not seem to exert a strong influence on these measurements. We found a significant difference compared to other populations, suggesting that MC course varies in different ethnic groups. Variations which may occur between individuals and different populations make it essential for dentists and surgeons to plan carefully before procedures in this region.



---

*Source: 2709401-2018-06-07.xml*