# Dual-Polarized On-Chip Antenna for 300 GHz Full-Duplex Communication System

Authors: Linyan Guo; Ming Deng; Qisheng Zhang; Xinyue Zhang; Zhenzhong Yuan
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

This paper presents a novel design of compact orthogonally polarized on-chip antenna to realize 300 GHz full-duplex communication system with high isolation. It consists of a dipole antenna for horizontal polarization and a disk-loaded monopole antenna for vertical polarization. They are in good cross-polarization state with more than 90 dB of self-interference suppression and then can be used to achieve good isolation between transmitting and receiving antennas. In addition, two dual-polarized antennas have been adopted in two separated transceivers to study their isolation performance. Furthermore, this compact antenna only occupies an active area of 390μm × 300 μm × 78 μm and can be used for multiple-input multiple-output application as well.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Full-duplex systems have attracted a lot of interest for allowing a radio node to transmit and receive signals simultaneously at the same frequency. They can potentially double the data rates achieved by half-duplex systems. However, self-interference (SI) existing in full-duplex systems decreases the obtainable signal-to-interference ratio and makes them difficult to achieve in practice. Therefore, it is very important to suppress the SI at the receiver that is caused by coupling from its own transmitter. In earlier works, there are many ways to reduce the SI level below the receiver’s noise floor, such as active cancellation, passive suppression, and a combination of them [1–3]. A majority of the overall SI suppression is due to passive suppression, that is, isolation between transmitting and receiving antennas. In a general way, there are three key mechanisms in the antenna domain. They are the directional isolation, absorptive shielding, and cross-polarization [4–7].In these techniques, cross-polarization is one of the most common ways by using orthogonally polarized antennas. While the dual-polarized antenna favorably addresses the cross-polarization requirement, there are still some aspects that need be addressed to make the antenna fully suitable for future full-duplex communication. For example, the polarization isolation of orthogonally polarized antennas must be maximized. This is instrumental for the node to transmit signal with one polarization mode and receive it with an orthogonal polarization mode. However, in previous works, most traditional dual-polarized antennas achieve two polarization instances which are both parallel to the dielectric plane [8–10]. It is more suitable for them to be used between terminals on stacked boards. But, in some cases, terminals are placed transversely. Hence, in this paper, dual-polarized on-chip antenna has been designed to realize a horizontal polarization along substrate surface and a vertical polarization perpendicular to substrate surface. It will be much suitable for two boards placed in side-by-side working situation with full-duplex communication. And this will make the full-duplex systems have a wider application prospect.This paper is organized as follows. After introducing the design of dual-polarized on-chip antenna with high polarization isolation in Section2, Section 3 studied the propagation property of two full-duplex nodes equipped with this dual-polarized antenna. Section 4 finally concludes this paper.


## 2. Dual-Polarized Antenna

The proposed dual-polarized antenna consists of a horizontally polarized dipole antenna and a vertically polarized monopole antenna. It has two feeding ports: one is a balanced port to feed dipole antenna and the other one is a coaxial port to feed monopole antenna. In general, on-chip antennas are fed by small wafer probes. However, the characterization of these antennas cannot use probe-fed methods, as the probes are much larger than the antenna structures. Hence, the on-chip antenna could directly connect front integrated circuit after matching their complex impedances conjugately instead of a matching network [11]. The operations of separate antenna components have been simulated and optimized by a transient solver in CST Microwave Studio software. Since it is hard to fabricate and do experiment at this frequency, simulation results by HFSS are provided for comparison. In this work, in order to integrate this antenna with full-duplex modulator circuit, the on-chip antenna design is deposited on a benzocyclobutene (BCB) membrane and then an InP substrate, which is the same as [12, 13]. At 300 GHz, the permittivity of InP substrate is 12.5 with loss tangent 0.002, while the BCB substrate has a permittivity of 2.5 and loss tangent 0.005.


### 2.1. Horizontally Polarized Dipole Antenna

Firstly, we simulated and optimized the performance of the horizontally polarized dipole antenna. Its geometry is sketched in Figure1. It consists of a dipole antenna and a parasitic reflector which are placed on top of the BCB membrane. Whole sizes of the InP and BCB substrate in x- and y-direction are a=b=300μm. The InP substrate has a thickness h1=50μm and the BCB membrane has h2=6μm. In simulation, metal of the dipole and reflector is gold with conductivity of σ=4.561×107 S/m and thickness of 2μm. Two dipole arms have been fed by a balanced feedline with length 25μm and width 10μm where a balanced port is fed here. Each dipole arm has identical length l1=125μm and width w=5μm. There is also a g=2μm gap between two arms. We put the dipole arms 25μm away from right edge of the substrate. It is because the on-chip antenna gain is very poor when the dipole is mounted on the center of the chip, due to the lossy substrate and the close proximity of the radiation angle to the horizon [14]. Then a gold reflector was designed for reflecting electromagnetic wave to its right side with the purpose of achieving high directivity and increased antenna gain. It has a length l2=300μm and the same width with dipole arms w=5μm. In addition, distance between the dipole and reflector is d=110μm which is approximately λ/4. So the whole size of the dipole antenna is 300μm×300μm×58μm.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the dipole antenna. (a) Top view of antenna structure. (b) Side view of structure with different layers.
(a)
(b)Figure2(a) shows the simulated magnitude ofS11 parameter of the proposed dipole antenna by CST and HFSS. These curves in this figure have similar results and this means the CST results are acceptable. The dipole antenna has a bandwidth of 36.55 GHz (from 291.45 GHz to 328.0 GHz). Since two dipole arms are placed along y-axis and parallel to the surface of BCB and InP substrates, this dipole antenna is a horizontally polarized antenna. It can also be verified byE-field magnitude detected by a probe 5000μm away from the antenna on x-axes (not shown here). By detecting the x-, y-, and z-component ofE-field magnitude, y-component is about 100 dB higher than x- and z-component. Hence, this antenna is a horizontally polarized (y-polarized) antenna. Figure 2(b) illustratesE-plane of the dipole antenna at 300 GHz. 2DE-plane of the proposed dipole antenna can be achieved by setting θ=90∘. Since most energy points are at the direction of ϕ=0∘, it means that the dipole antenna mainly radiates to its right side.H-plane in Figure 2(c) also shows that this antenna radiates to the right side. In addition, the simulated maximum gain of this dipole antenna is 4.91 dBi.Figure 2
(a) Magnitude ofS11 in dB of the dipole antenna. (b)E-plane of the dipole antenna at 300 GHz with θ=90∘. (c)H-plane of the dipole antenna at 300 GHz with ϕ=0∘.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 2.2. Vertically Polarized Monopole Antenna

Figure3 shows the geometry of vertically polarized monopole antenna. Since its radiation arm travels through the substrate, it is a vertically polarized antenna. The BCB and InP substrates have the same size as that in horizontally polarized dipole antenna. In Figure 3(a), an annular gold ground is located on the backside of InP substrate with height hg=20μm, outer radius r1=98μm, and inner radius r2=30μm. A solid cylinder radiation travels through substrates and the annular ground with a radius of r3=13μm and height h=78μm. Then a gold disk is added on the top of the cylinder radiation in order to lengthen the monopole’s electrical length (shown in Figure 3(b)). This gold disk has a thickness 2μm and radius r4=40μm. In Figure 3(c), another parasitic annular ring has been added on the top of BCB substrate and located outside of the gold disk. It has an outer radius r5=98μm and inner radius r6=50μm. In addition, four slender columns encircle the monopole and connect the top annular ring and ground. It can be seen in Figures 3(d) and 3(e). These four columns have the same dimensions with height 78μm and diameter 10μm. After that, Figure 3(f) is the side view of the monopole antenna. Finally, in the case of coaxial feeding, this vertically polarized monopole antenna has a whole size of 300μm×300μm×78μm.Figure 3
Schematic diagram of the vertically polarized monopole antenna.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)Figure4(a) shows the simulated magnitude ofS11 parameter of the monopole antenna by CST and HFSS. It shows that these curves have similar results and this antenna has a narrow bandwidth of 6.07 GHz (from 297.19 GHz to 303.26 GHz). Figures 4(b) and 4(c) illustrate itsE-plane andH-plane at 300 GHz. Figures 4(b) and 4(c) illustrate itsE-plane andH-plane at 300 GHz and show that this antenna is an omnidirectional antenna. This antenna radiates to the wholex-y plane and has a maximum simulated gain of 1.72 dBi. This characteristic can also be verified byE-field magnitude detected by a probe placed away from the antenna on x-axes (not shown here). By detecting x-, y-, and z-component ofE-field magnitude, z-component is the highest one and plays a dominant role when compared with the other two components. Hence, this monopole antenna is generally a vertically polarized (z-polarized) antenna.Figure 4
(a) Magnitude ofS11 in dB of the monopole antenna. (b)E-plane of the dipole antenna at 300 GHz with ϕ=0∘. (c)H-plane of the dipole antenna at 300 GHz with θ=90∘.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 2.3. Dual-Polarized Antenna

Figure5 shows the top view and side view of the dual-polarized antenna. Since the dipole antenna and monopole antenna are orthogonally polarized, they can work together with low cross coupling between each other. At the same time, they can also be put as close as possible. Hence, position of the dipole antenna and monopole antenna has been modified to achieve a compact size 390μm×300μm×78μm. The dipole antenna still has a 25μm distance from the right edge of substrate, while the monopole has only a 12μm distance from the left edge. Consequently, distance between the dipole antenna and monopole antenna is only 37μm, which is much smaller than antenna array’s distance requirement λ/2.Figure 5
Dual-polarized antenna topology. (a) Top view. (b) Side view.
(a)
(b)Figure6 shows the simulated magnitude ofS-parameter of two antenna components. In this figure, under the influence of monopole antenna, S11 of horizontally polarized dipole has a bandwidth of 22.81 GHz (from 291.45 GHz to 314.26 GHz). It has a narrower bandwidth than its original model. S22 is the magnitude of S-parameter of vertically polarized monopole. It has a bandwidth of 5.8 GHz (from 295.6 GHz to 301.4 GHz). In addition, S12 is S-parameter when monopole transmits and dipole receives signal. Similarly, S21 comes out when dipole transmits and monopole receives signal. In this figure, S12 has the same value with S21 within the whole research frequency band. In order to make a better comparison, this figure also provides S12 by HFSS. It is 15 dB higher than the simulated results by CST. But both of them are about 90 dB lower than S11 and S22. This means both the dipole and monopole have small impact on the other one. Therefore, this dual-polarized antenna can achieve SI suppression of 90 dB in the cross-polarization way. They have strong cross-polarization isolation and can work together even though they are put within a short distance.Figure 6
Simulated magnitude ofS-parameter in dB of the dual-polarized antenna.A probe has also been placed at the same location. Similarly,y-component of dipole’sE-field and z-component of monopole’sE-field are the highest in theirE-field magnitude. Hence, this antenna is a dual-polarized (y- andz-polarized) antenna. At the same time, the monopole and dipole are in orthogonal polarization states.


## 2.1. Horizontally Polarized Dipole Antenna

Firstly, we simulated and optimized the performance of the horizontally polarized dipole antenna. Its geometry is sketched in Figure1. It consists of a dipole antenna and a parasitic reflector which are placed on top of the BCB membrane. Whole sizes of the InP and BCB substrate in x- and y-direction are a=b=300μm. The InP substrate has a thickness h1=50μm and the BCB membrane has h2=6μm. In simulation, metal of the dipole and reflector is gold with conductivity of σ=4.561×107 S/m and thickness of 2μm. Two dipole arms have been fed by a balanced feedline with length 25μm and width 10μm where a balanced port is fed here. Each dipole arm has identical length l1=125μm and width w=5μm. There is also a g=2μm gap between two arms. We put the dipole arms 25μm away from right edge of the substrate. It is because the on-chip antenna gain is very poor when the dipole is mounted on the center of the chip, due to the lossy substrate and the close proximity of the radiation angle to the horizon [14]. Then a gold reflector was designed for reflecting electromagnetic wave to its right side with the purpose of achieving high directivity and increased antenna gain. It has a length l2=300μm and the same width with dipole arms w=5μm. In addition, distance between the dipole and reflector is d=110μm which is approximately λ/4. So the whole size of the dipole antenna is 300μm×300μm×58μm.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the dipole antenna. (a) Top view of antenna structure. (b) Side view of structure with different layers.
(a)
(b)Figure2(a) shows the simulated magnitude ofS11 parameter of the proposed dipole antenna by CST and HFSS. These curves in this figure have similar results and this means the CST results are acceptable. The dipole antenna has a bandwidth of 36.55 GHz (from 291.45 GHz to 328.0 GHz). Since two dipole arms are placed along y-axis and parallel to the surface of BCB and InP substrates, this dipole antenna is a horizontally polarized antenna. It can also be verified byE-field magnitude detected by a probe 5000μm away from the antenna on x-axes (not shown here). By detecting the x-, y-, and z-component ofE-field magnitude, y-component is about 100 dB higher than x- and z-component. Hence, this antenna is a horizontally polarized (y-polarized) antenna. Figure 2(b) illustratesE-plane of the dipole antenna at 300 GHz. 2DE-plane of the proposed dipole antenna can be achieved by setting θ=90∘. Since most energy points are at the direction of ϕ=0∘, it means that the dipole antenna mainly radiates to its right side.H-plane in Figure 2(c) also shows that this antenna radiates to the right side. In addition, the simulated maximum gain of this dipole antenna is 4.91 dBi.Figure 2
(a) Magnitude ofS11 in dB of the dipole antenna. (b)E-plane of the dipole antenna at 300 GHz with θ=90∘. (c)H-plane of the dipole antenna at 300 GHz with ϕ=0∘.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 2.2. Vertically Polarized Monopole Antenna

Figure3 shows the geometry of vertically polarized monopole antenna. Since its radiation arm travels through the substrate, it is a vertically polarized antenna. The BCB and InP substrates have the same size as that in horizontally polarized dipole antenna. In Figure 3(a), an annular gold ground is located on the backside of InP substrate with height hg=20μm, outer radius r1=98μm, and inner radius r2=30μm. A solid cylinder radiation travels through substrates and the annular ground with a radius of r3=13μm and height h=78μm. Then a gold disk is added on the top of the cylinder radiation in order to lengthen the monopole’s electrical length (shown in Figure 3(b)). This gold disk has a thickness 2μm and radius r4=40μm. In Figure 3(c), another parasitic annular ring has been added on the top of BCB substrate and located outside of the gold disk. It has an outer radius r5=98μm and inner radius r6=50μm. In addition, four slender columns encircle the monopole and connect the top annular ring and ground. It can be seen in Figures 3(d) and 3(e). These four columns have the same dimensions with height 78μm and diameter 10μm. After that, Figure 3(f) is the side view of the monopole antenna. Finally, in the case of coaxial feeding, this vertically polarized monopole antenna has a whole size of 300μm×300μm×78μm.Figure 3
Schematic diagram of the vertically polarized monopole antenna.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)Figure4(a) shows the simulated magnitude ofS11 parameter of the monopole antenna by CST and HFSS. It shows that these curves have similar results and this antenna has a narrow bandwidth of 6.07 GHz (from 297.19 GHz to 303.26 GHz). Figures 4(b) and 4(c) illustrate itsE-plane andH-plane at 300 GHz. Figures 4(b) and 4(c) illustrate itsE-plane andH-plane at 300 GHz and show that this antenna is an omnidirectional antenna. This antenna radiates to the wholex-y plane and has a maximum simulated gain of 1.72 dBi. This characteristic can also be verified byE-field magnitude detected by a probe placed away from the antenna on x-axes (not shown here). By detecting x-, y-, and z-component ofE-field magnitude, z-component is the highest one and plays a dominant role when compared with the other two components. Hence, this monopole antenna is generally a vertically polarized (z-polarized) antenna.Figure 4
(a) Magnitude ofS11 in dB of the monopole antenna. (b)E-plane of the dipole antenna at 300 GHz with ϕ=0∘. (c)H-plane of the dipole antenna at 300 GHz with θ=90∘.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 2.3. Dual-Polarized Antenna

Figure5 shows the top view and side view of the dual-polarized antenna. Since the dipole antenna and monopole antenna are orthogonally polarized, they can work together with low cross coupling between each other. At the same time, they can also be put as close as possible. Hence, position of the dipole antenna and monopole antenna has been modified to achieve a compact size 390μm×300μm×78μm. The dipole antenna still has a 25μm distance from the right edge of substrate, while the monopole has only a 12μm distance from the left edge. Consequently, distance between the dipole antenna and monopole antenna is only 37μm, which is much smaller than antenna array’s distance requirement λ/2.Figure 5
Dual-polarized antenna topology. (a) Top view. (b) Side view.
(a)
(b)Figure6 shows the simulated magnitude ofS-parameter of two antenna components. In this figure, under the influence of monopole antenna, S11 of horizontally polarized dipole has a bandwidth of 22.81 GHz (from 291.45 GHz to 314.26 GHz). It has a narrower bandwidth than its original model. S22 is the magnitude of S-parameter of vertically polarized monopole. It has a bandwidth of 5.8 GHz (from 295.6 GHz to 301.4 GHz). In addition, S12 is S-parameter when monopole transmits and dipole receives signal. Similarly, S21 comes out when dipole transmits and monopole receives signal. In this figure, S12 has the same value with S21 within the whole research frequency band. In order to make a better comparison, this figure also provides S12 by HFSS. It is 15 dB higher than the simulated results by CST. But both of them are about 90 dB lower than S11 and S22. This means both the dipole and monopole have small impact on the other one. Therefore, this dual-polarized antenna can achieve SI suppression of 90 dB in the cross-polarization way. They have strong cross-polarization isolation and can work together even though they are put within a short distance.Figure 6
Simulated magnitude ofS-parameter in dB of the dual-polarized antenna.A probe has also been placed at the same location. Similarly,y-component of dipole’sE-field and z-component of monopole’sE-field are the highest in theirE-field magnitude. Hence, this antenna is a dual-polarized (y- andz-polarized) antenna. At the same time, the monopole and dipole are in orthogonal polarization states.


## 3. Dual-Polarized Antenna in Transceivers for Full-Duplex System

Different from most traditional dual-polarized antennas fed by one port, this dual-polarized antenna has two separate feeding ports. Figure7 shows two identical nodes topology with the proposed dual-polarized antennas. In this side-by-side case, when horizontally polarized dipole in Node 1 (Antenna 1) works as a transmitter, another horizontally polarized antenna in Node 2 (Antenna 3) will work as a receiving antenna. At the same time, reverse link can also work effectively but in vertical polarization mode without any influence on the forward link. In other words, the monopole in Node 2 (Antenna 4) can transmit signal to monopole in Node 1 (Antenna 2) by the means of vertically polarized signals.Figure 7
Schematic diagram of the 300 GHz dual-polarized antenna in transceivers for full-duplex system. The simulation distance between two nodes is5000μm.The performance of the dual-polarized antennas in full-duplex system is examined numerically. Figure8(a) shows the isolation between Antenna 1 and antennas in Node 2. S31 is S-parameter when Antenna 1 transmits and Antenna 3 receives signals. It can be seen that Antenna 3 has high cocoupling level with Antenna 1. It has the highest average receiving level of about −43 dB. S41 is S-parameter when Antenna 1 transmits and Antenna 4 receives signals. In this case, the cross-polarized Antenna 4 has a lowest receiving level of −160 dB. Additionally, S34 is the magnitude received by Antenna 3 when Antenna 4 transmits signals. It shows an average receiving level of −124 dB. That is a fairly low level and 81 dB lower than that received from Antenna 1. Hence, from the receiving level, the influence of Antenna 4 on Antenna 3 can be ignored when Antenna 3 receives signals from Antenna 1.Figure 8
S-parameter of four antennas in Node 1 and Node 2. (a) Red straight line is cocoupling between Antenna 1 and Antenna 3. Black dot line is cross-polarized isolation between Antenna 1 and Antenna 4. Blue dash line is SI from Antenna 4 in Node 2. (b) Red straight line is cocoupling between Antenna 2 and Antenna 4. Black dot line is cross-polarized isolation between Antenna 1 and Antenna 4. Blue dash line is SI from Antenna 1 in Node 1.
(a)
(b)In the meantime, Antenna 4 of Node 2 can transmit data backward when Antenna 3 receives signals from Node 1. Figure8(b) shows that copolarized Antenna 2 has a receiving level of −60 dB (S24). It is about 60 dB higher than that received from Antenna 1. Hence, the influence of Antenna 1 is quite minimal. Meanwhile, the cross-polarized Antenna 1 (S14) has a relatively low receiving level of −160 dB.


## 4. Conclusions

We have proposed a dual-polarized on-chip antenna which can be used in 300 GHz full-duplex communication system. Based on these results, we have proved that this orthogonally polarized antenna isolation technique is feasible. With the proposed technique, we obtain an average 90 dB SI isolation level with a compact antenna size. In future work, in order to completely suppress the SI of full-duplex nodes, we will investigate combining different isolation technologies including the proposed orthogonally polarized antenna technique.



---

*Source: 2837629-2017-07-09.xml*