# Water Level Sensing in a Steel Vessel Using A0 and Quasi-Scholte Waves

Authors: Peng Guo; Bo Deng; Xiang Lan; Kaili Zhang; Hongyuan Li; Zhenhua Tian; Hong Xu
Journal: Journal of Sensors
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

This paper presents a water level sensing method using guided waves of A0 and quasi-Scholte modes. Theoretical, numerical, and experimental studies are performed to investigate the properties of both the A0 and quasi-Scholte modes. The comparative study of dispersion curves reveals that the plate with one side in water supports a quasi-Scholte mode besides Lamb modes. In addition, group velocities of A0 and quasi-Scholte modes are different. It is also found that the low-frequency A0 mode propagating in a free plate can convert to the quasi-Scholte mode when the plate has one side in water. Based on the velocity difference and mode conversion, a water level sensing method is developed. For the proof of concept, a laboratory experiment using a pitch-catch configuration with two piezoelectric transducers is designed for sensing water level in a steel vessel. The experimental results show that the travelling time between the two transducers linearly increases with the increase of water level and agree well with the theoretical predictions.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In power plants, monitoring the water levels in core facilities, such as the boiler steam drum, condensers, and cooling pipes, is critical for the safety and economical operation of power plants. Hence, there is a need to develop nondestructive technologies for high-precision, high-reliability, real-time monitoring of water levels in steel vessels. Ultrasonic guided waves have opened new opportunities for cost-effective nondestructive evaluation (NDE), because they can reveal small features related to the interaction between guided waves and structures and provide considerable information about the structures [1–4]. When a solid waveguide is immersed in water, the traction-free boundary condition changes and the wave propagation in the solid will change accordingly. When a free plate is immersed in water, the out-of-plane displacement in the plate can transmit into the water through the plate-water interface [1]. Worlton [5] extended the Lamb theory by using experimental observations and derived the dispersion curves for aluminum and zirconium plates. Bingham et al. [6] used ultrasonic guided waves to identify the mass loading on ship hulls. Na and Kundu [7] detected gouges and dents in an underwater pipeline using guided waves. Chen et al. [8] developed a damage identification approach using the A0 mode for evaluating corrosion damage in submerged structures. Koduru and Rose [9] utilized an array of permanently mounted transducers to detect defects and avoid the influences from external environmental conditions, for example, water loading and temperature change. Pistone et al. [10] performed experimental studies using a pulsed laser for structural health monitoring of immersed aluminum plates. Yapura and Kinra [11] derived dispersion equations for a fluid-solid bilayer and then presented a numerical result for a water-aluminum bilayer. Baron and Naili [12] studied the fluid-loaded anisotropic and homogeneous plane waveguide with two different fluids on each side using an analytical approach. Yu and Tian [13] used a scanning laser Doppler vibrometer for measuring quasi-Scholte waves in one-side water-immersed plates. Banerjee and Kundu [14] developed the distributed point source method (DPSM) to simulate the ultrasonic wavefields at the fluid and solid interface; their method can also be used to calculate the pressure, velocity, and displacement fields in the fluid.For power plants, the frequently used water level measurement methods include the differential pressure gauge [15], ultrasonic level meter [16, 17], and radar level gauge [18]. For the differential pressure gauge, the water level is determined from the static pressure change induced by the water level change. Usually, there is a delay for determining the water level after the water level changes. In addition, the pressure condition might change due to the changes of temperature and other operation conditions. These factors could cause large errors in water level sensing. The ultrasonic level meter uses ultrasonic pulses reflected from the liquid-gas interface to determine the water level. In this method, ultrasonic pulses are generated by a transducer placed on the bottom of the container. Based on the travelling time of reflection waves, the water level is determined. However, large errors can be induced by poor reflection from the water surface and complex scattering waves in the container. The principle of radar level gauge is similar to the ultrasonic level meter, while the radar level gauge uses microwave pulses. In this method, the sensors need to be installed in the container, and thus the sensor installation may influence the integrity of the container and cause leakage. In addition, the water vapor on the waveguide tube might influence the signal quality.In this paper, we present a water level sensing method for steel vessels by using guided waves of A0 and quasi-Scholte modes. For water level sensing, two piezoelectric transducers (PZTs) are bonded on the out surface of the vessel in the pitch-catch configuration to generate and measure guided waves. The generated guided waves propagate in the wall of the vessel. The mode conversion between A0 and quasi-Scholte modes at the water interface is observed. Based on the velocity difference between A0 and quasi-Scholte modes, a quantitative method for detecting the water level is developed. Through proof-of-concept experiments, it has been found that the travelling time of guided waves in the vessel linearly increases with the increase of water level. Moreover, the experimental results agree well with theoretical predictions. The developed method provides several advantages. The method has a small error less than 3.7 mm, and sensors can be easily installed on the outer surface of the container without influencing the structural integrity. In addition, since the sensors are not in the container, the sensors can be easily maintained. Moreover, compared to the ultrasonic level meter, our method does not rely on the poor reflection from the water boundary and is less influenced by the scattering waves inside the container.The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section2 presents the guided wave fundamentals, such as characteristic equations and dispersion curves for the free plate and the plate with one side in water. Section 3 presents the verifications of A0 mode in the free plate and quasi-Scholte mode in the plate with one side in water through finite element simulations and experiments. Section 4 presents the water level sensing method with a proof-of-concept experiment. Section 5 concludes the paper with findings and future work.


## 2. Theoretical Fundamentals

### 2.1. Free Plates

Considerable research exists on the dispersion characteristics of guided waves in free isotropic plates [1, 2, 13, 19]. In this section, the dispersion characteristics of guided waves in a free plate with traction-free boundary conditions are given. For a free plate (in Figure 1(a)), the boundary conditions for the top and bottom surfaces of the plate can be described as follows:
(1)σxxp_t=0,σxzp_t=0,σxxp_b=0,σxzp_b=0,where σxxp_t and σxzp_t are the normal and shear stresses on the top surface of the plate, respectively. σxxp_b and σxzp_b are the normal and shear stresses on the bottom surface of the plate, respectively. The characteristic equation of Lamb waves in a free plate can be expressed as follows:
(2)ksx2−kz2ksx2−kz2−2ksxkz2ksxkz2klxkz−2klxkzksx2−kz2ksx2−kz2ksx2−kz2eiklxdksx2−kz2e−iklxd−2ksxkzeiksxd2ksxkze−iksxd2klxkzeiklxd−2klxkze−iklxdksx2−kz2eiksxdksx2−kz2e−iksxd=0,where klx2=ω2/cL2−kz2, ksx2=ω2/cS2−kz2, kz=2π/λwave, cL=2μ1−ν/ρ1−2ν, and cS=μ/ρ. kz is the wavenumber of Lamb waves. d is the plate thickness. ω and λwave are the circular frequency and wavelength, respectively. cL and cS are the velocities of longitudinal and shear waves, respectively. ρ, μ, and ν are the density, shear modulus, and Poisson’s ratio of the plate, respectively. By solving (2), the dispersion curves for a steel plate (the material properties of the steel plate are listed in Table 1) are obtained, as shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b). In the low-frequency region, the group velocity of S0 mode is relatively high. In contrast, the group velocity of A0 mode is relatively low and changes greatly with respect to frequency.Figure 1
Sketches of (a) a free plate and (b) a plate with one side in water.
(a)
(b)Table 1
Material properties for a steel plate and water.
Stainless steel plate
Density (kg/m3)
8000
Young’s modulus (GPa)
196.5
Poisson’s ratio
0.29
Thickness (mm)
1.2
Water
Density (kg/m3)
1000
Bulk wave velocity (m/s)
1500Figure 2
Theoretical dispersion curves: (a) and (b) are group and phase velocities for a 1.2 mm thick steel plate; (c) and (d) are group and phase velocities for a 1.2 mm thick steel plate with one side in water.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 2.2. Plates with One Side in Water

As shown in Figure1(b), when the bottom surface of a free plate is in water, its boundary conditions change compared to a free plate. Under the nonviscosity assumption, the boundary conditions for the bottom surface become
(3)σxxp_b=σxxwater,σxzp_b=0,uxxp_b=uxxwater,where uxxp_b is the normal displacement on the bottom surface of the plate. uxxwater and σxxwater are the normal displacement and stress at the plate-water interface, respectively. The characteristic equation for the plate with one side in water can be assembled and expressed as follows:
(4)ksx2−kz2ksx2−kz2−2ksxkz2ksxkz02klxkz−2klxkzksx2−kz2ksx2−kz20ksx2−kz2eiklxdksx2−kz2e−iklxd−2ksxkzeiksxd2ksxkze−iksxdω2ρwμ2klxkzeiklxd−2klxkze−iklxdksx2−kz2eiksxdksx2−kz2e−iksxd0klxeiklxd−klxe−iklxd−kzeiksxd−kze−iksxdγ=0,where γ2=ω2/cLw2−kz2 and cLw=λw/ρw. cLw is the bulk velocity in water; λw and ρw are the bulk stiffness and density of water, respectively. By solving (4), the dispersion curves of a 1.2 mm thick steel plate with one side in water are obtained. As shown in Figures 2(c) and 2(d), the fundamental antisymmetric and symmetric modes are denoted as A0w and S0w. Compared to dispersion curves for a free plate (Figure 2(a)), dispersion curves for a plate with one side in water (Figure 2(c)) clearly show another mode, the quasi-Scholte mode, in addition to the fundamental antisymmetric and symmetric modes. The dispersive behavior of the quasi-Scholte mode in the plate with one side in water is the same as the mode discovered in a two-side water-immersed plate in [20]. The quasi-Scholte mode is dispersive in the low-frequency region; however, with the increase of the frequency, the mode gradually approaches the nondispersive Scholte mode (interface wave at solid and liquid interface) [20, 21].


## 2.1. Free Plates

Considerable research exists on the dispersion characteristics of guided waves in free isotropic plates [1, 2, 13, 19]. In this section, the dispersion characteristics of guided waves in a free plate with traction-free boundary conditions are given. For a free plate (in Figure 1(a)), the boundary conditions for the top and bottom surfaces of the plate can be described as follows:
(1)σxxp_t=0,σxzp_t=0,σxxp_b=0,σxzp_b=0,where σxxp_t and σxzp_t are the normal and shear stresses on the top surface of the plate, respectively. σxxp_b and σxzp_b are the normal and shear stresses on the bottom surface of the plate, respectively. The characteristic equation of Lamb waves in a free plate can be expressed as follows:
(2)ksx2−kz2ksx2−kz2−2ksxkz2ksxkz2klxkz−2klxkzksx2−kz2ksx2−kz2ksx2−kz2eiklxdksx2−kz2e−iklxd−2ksxkzeiksxd2ksxkze−iksxd2klxkzeiklxd−2klxkze−iklxdksx2−kz2eiksxdksx2−kz2e−iksxd=0,where klx2=ω2/cL2−kz2, ksx2=ω2/cS2−kz2, kz=2π/λwave, cL=2μ1−ν/ρ1−2ν, and cS=μ/ρ. kz is the wavenumber of Lamb waves. d is the plate thickness. ω and λwave are the circular frequency and wavelength, respectively. cL and cS are the velocities of longitudinal and shear waves, respectively. ρ, μ, and ν are the density, shear modulus, and Poisson’s ratio of the plate, respectively. By solving (2), the dispersion curves for a steel plate (the material properties of the steel plate are listed in Table 1) are obtained, as shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b). In the low-frequency region, the group velocity of S0 mode is relatively high. In contrast, the group velocity of A0 mode is relatively low and changes greatly with respect to frequency.Figure 1
Sketches of (a) a free plate and (b) a plate with one side in water.
(a)
(b)Table 1
Material properties for a steel plate and water.
Stainless steel plate
Density (kg/m3)
8000
Young’s modulus (GPa)
196.5
Poisson’s ratio
0.29
Thickness (mm)
1.2
Water
Density (kg/m3)
1000
Bulk wave velocity (m/s)
1500Figure 2
Theoretical dispersion curves: (a) and (b) are group and phase velocities for a 1.2 mm thick steel plate; (c) and (d) are group and phase velocities for a 1.2 mm thick steel plate with one side in water.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 2.2. Plates with One Side in Water

As shown in Figure1(b), when the bottom surface of a free plate is in water, its boundary conditions change compared to a free plate. Under the nonviscosity assumption, the boundary conditions for the bottom surface become
(3)σxxp_b=σxxwater,σxzp_b=0,uxxp_b=uxxwater,where uxxp_b is the normal displacement on the bottom surface of the plate. uxxwater and σxxwater are the normal displacement and stress at the plate-water interface, respectively. The characteristic equation for the plate with one side in water can be assembled and expressed as follows:
(4)ksx2−kz2ksx2−kz2−2ksxkz2ksxkz02klxkz−2klxkzksx2−kz2ksx2−kz20ksx2−kz2eiklxdksx2−kz2e−iklxd−2ksxkzeiksxd2ksxkze−iksxdω2ρwμ2klxkzeiklxd−2klxkze−iklxdksx2−kz2eiksxdksx2−kz2e−iksxd0klxeiklxd−klxe−iklxd−kzeiksxd−kze−iksxdγ=0,where γ2=ω2/cLw2−kz2 and cLw=λw/ρw. cLw is the bulk velocity in water; λw and ρw are the bulk stiffness and density of water, respectively. By solving (4), the dispersion curves of a 1.2 mm thick steel plate with one side in water are obtained. As shown in Figures 2(c) and 2(d), the fundamental antisymmetric and symmetric modes are denoted as A0w and S0w. Compared to dispersion curves for a free plate (Figure 2(a)), dispersion curves for a plate with one side in water (Figure 2(c)) clearly show another mode, the quasi-Scholte mode, in addition to the fundamental antisymmetric and symmetric modes. The dispersive behavior of the quasi-Scholte mode in the plate with one side in water is the same as the mode discovered in a two-side water-immersed plate in [20]. The quasi-Scholte mode is dispersive in the low-frequency region; however, with the increase of the frequency, the mode gradually approaches the nondispersive Scholte mode (interface wave at solid and liquid interface) [20, 21].


## 3. Simulation and Experimental Studies

In the previous section, the dispersion curves of guided waves in a free plate and a plate with one side in water are theoretically studied. In this section, the quasi-Scholte and A0 modes are further investigated through finite element simulations and experiments.


### 3.1. Verification of the A0 Mode in a Free Plate

Finite element simulations are performed using the commercial software ANSYS to analyze the propagation of A0 mode in a free plate. The finite element model of a plate’s cross section is built using 2D elements (8-node PLANE82). Table 1 gives the material parameters of the plate. The thickness and length of the plate are 1.2 mm and 100 mm, respectively. For simulating elastic waves in solids using finite element method (FEM), the transient analysis in ANSYS is adopted. To ensure the accuracy of the simulation, the grid size and the integral time step satisfy the following:
(5)Lmax<λminnmin=cminnminf,Δt≤Lmincs,where Lmax and Lmin are the maximum and minimum grid size, respectively; λmin is the minimum wavelength; nmin is the minimum number of elements within one wavelength (usually nmin is in the range of 8~10); cs denotes the velocity of shear waves; and cmin is the minimum group velocity of elastic waves. Vertical loads are applied on the nodes at X = 0 on top and bottom surfaces, for generating a pure A0 mode.Figure3 shows the simulation result (a vector field of displacement) for the A0 mode, when the excitation is 5-count tone bursts at 100 kHz. From the result, it can be seen that the A0 mode is antisymmetric. In addition, the vertical displacement is much stronger than the horizontal displacement. The displacement signals at four different locations (X = 20, 40, 60, and 80 mm on the bottom surface of the plate) are plotted in Figure 4. Using the traveling time and propagation distance, we can calculate the group velocity of A0 mode, 1.92 mm/μs, which agrees well with the theoretical velocity 1.925 mm/μs.Figure 3
The FEM simulation result (displacement vector field) of the excited A0 mode in a free plate at 100 kHz.Figure 4
Out-of-plate displacement signals (simulation results) at different locations in the free plate. (a), (b), (c), and (d) are forX = 20, 40, 60, and 80 mm, respectively, on the bottom surface of the plate.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)An experiment is performed using the setup in Figure5(a), for wave mode verification. Two PZT transducers (with dimensions of 7 × 7 × 0.2 mm) in a pitch-catch configuration are adopted. The distance between two transducers is 150 mm. The excitation signal is 2.5-cycle tone bursts at 100 kHz. Figure 6 plots a received signal with its Hilbert envelope. Using the travelling time obtained from the received signal and the distance between two transducers, the group velocity of A0 mode is calculated, which is 1.89 mm/μs. Figure 7 compares the A0 mode’s group velocities obtained from the theory, simulation, and experiment at 50, 100, and 150 kHz. The results of the theory, simulation, and experiment agree well with each other.Figure 5
The experimental setup for guided wave sensing and mode identification: (a) in a free plate; (b) in a plate with one side in water.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
Experimental signal of guided waves in a free steel plate at 100 kHz.Figure 7
Comparison of A0 mode’s group velocities obtained from theory, simulation, and experiment.


### 3.2. Verification of the Quasi-Scholte Mode in a Plate with One Side in Water

Finite element simulations are performed to analyze the propagation of quasi-Scholte mode in a plate with one side in water. Figure8(a) plots a schematic of the simulation setup. The top layer is a 1.2 mm thick steel plate. The bottom layer is water with the depth of 40 mm. In the finite element model, the water layer is created using the coupling field element (FLUID29).Figure 8
FEM simulation of the quasi-Scholte mode in a plate with one side in water at 100 kHz: (a) a schematic of the FEM model and (b) the simulation result (pressure field).
(a)
(b)Figure8(b) shows the simulation result (pressure field) when the excitation is 5-count tone bursts at 100 kHz. In the water layer, it can be seen that there are two types of waves, the quasi-Scholte waves and pressure waves (P waves). The quasi-Scholte mode propagates along the interface between the plate and the water, while the P waves only propagate in water. The displacement signals at four different locations (X = 20, 40, 60, and 80 mm on the bottom surface of the plate) are plotted in Figure 9. Using the traveling time and propagation distance, we find the group velocity of the quasi-Scholte mode, 1.86 mm/μs at 100 kHz, which agrees well with the theoretical velocity 1.84 mm/μs.Figure 9
Out-of-plate displacement signals (simulation results) at different locations in the plate with one side in water: (a), (b), (c), and (d) are forX = 20, 40, 60, and 80 mm, respectively, on the bottom surface of the plate.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)An experiment is also performed using the setup in Figure5(b), for wave mode verification. Two PZT transducers (with dimensions of 7 × 7 × 0.2 mm) in a pitch-catch configuration are adopted. The distance between the two transducers is 150 mm. The excitation signal is 2.5-cycle tone bursts 100 kHz. Figure 10 plots a received signal with its Hilbert envelope, when the excitation frequency is 100 kHz. Using the received signal and the distance between two transducers, the group velocity of A0 mode is obtained, which is 1.85 mm/μs. Figure 11 compares the quasi-Scholte mode’s group velocities obtained from the theory, simulation, and experiment at 50, 100, and 150 kHz. The results of theory, simulation, and experiment agree well with each other.Figure 10
Experimental signal of guided waves in the plate with one side in water at 100 kHz.Figure 11
Comparison of quasi-Scholte mode’s group velocities obtained from theory, simulation, and experiment.


## 3.1. Verification of the A0 Mode in a Free Plate

Finite element simulations are performed using the commercial software ANSYS to analyze the propagation of A0 mode in a free plate. The finite element model of a plate’s cross section is built using 2D elements (8-node PLANE82). Table 1 gives the material parameters of the plate. The thickness and length of the plate are 1.2 mm and 100 mm, respectively. For simulating elastic waves in solids using finite element method (FEM), the transient analysis in ANSYS is adopted. To ensure the accuracy of the simulation, the grid size and the integral time step satisfy the following:
(5)Lmax<λminnmin=cminnminf,Δt≤Lmincs,where Lmax and Lmin are the maximum and minimum grid size, respectively; λmin is the minimum wavelength; nmin is the minimum number of elements within one wavelength (usually nmin is in the range of 8~10); cs denotes the velocity of shear waves; and cmin is the minimum group velocity of elastic waves. Vertical loads are applied on the nodes at X = 0 on top and bottom surfaces, for generating a pure A0 mode.Figure3 shows the simulation result (a vector field of displacement) for the A0 mode, when the excitation is 5-count tone bursts at 100 kHz. From the result, it can be seen that the A0 mode is antisymmetric. In addition, the vertical displacement is much stronger than the horizontal displacement. The displacement signals at four different locations (X = 20, 40, 60, and 80 mm on the bottom surface of the plate) are plotted in Figure 4. Using the traveling time and propagation distance, we can calculate the group velocity of A0 mode, 1.92 mm/μs, which agrees well with the theoretical velocity 1.925 mm/μs.Figure 3
The FEM simulation result (displacement vector field) of the excited A0 mode in a free plate at 100 kHz.Figure 4
Out-of-plate displacement signals (simulation results) at different locations in the free plate. (a), (b), (c), and (d) are forX = 20, 40, 60, and 80 mm, respectively, on the bottom surface of the plate.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)An experiment is performed using the setup in Figure5(a), for wave mode verification. Two PZT transducers (with dimensions of 7 × 7 × 0.2 mm) in a pitch-catch configuration are adopted. The distance between two transducers is 150 mm. The excitation signal is 2.5-cycle tone bursts at 100 kHz. Figure 6 plots a received signal with its Hilbert envelope. Using the travelling time obtained from the received signal and the distance between two transducers, the group velocity of A0 mode is calculated, which is 1.89 mm/μs. Figure 7 compares the A0 mode’s group velocities obtained from the theory, simulation, and experiment at 50, 100, and 150 kHz. The results of the theory, simulation, and experiment agree well with each other.Figure 5
The experimental setup for guided wave sensing and mode identification: (a) in a free plate; (b) in a plate with one side in water.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
Experimental signal of guided waves in a free steel plate at 100 kHz.Figure 7
Comparison of A0 mode’s group velocities obtained from theory, simulation, and experiment.


## 3.2. Verification of the Quasi-Scholte Mode in a Plate with One Side in Water

Finite element simulations are performed to analyze the propagation of quasi-Scholte mode in a plate with one side in water. Figure8(a) plots a schematic of the simulation setup. The top layer is a 1.2 mm thick steel plate. The bottom layer is water with the depth of 40 mm. In the finite element model, the water layer is created using the coupling field element (FLUID29).Figure 8
FEM simulation of the quasi-Scholte mode in a plate with one side in water at 100 kHz: (a) a schematic of the FEM model and (b) the simulation result (pressure field).
(a)
(b)Figure8(b) shows the simulation result (pressure field) when the excitation is 5-count tone bursts at 100 kHz. In the water layer, it can be seen that there are two types of waves, the quasi-Scholte waves and pressure waves (P waves). The quasi-Scholte mode propagates along the interface between the plate and the water, while the P waves only propagate in water. The displacement signals at four different locations (X = 20, 40, 60, and 80 mm on the bottom surface of the plate) are plotted in Figure 9. Using the traveling time and propagation distance, we find the group velocity of the quasi-Scholte mode, 1.86 mm/μs at 100 kHz, which agrees well with the theoretical velocity 1.84 mm/μs.Figure 9
Out-of-plate displacement signals (simulation results) at different locations in the plate with one side in water: (a), (b), (c), and (d) are forX = 20, 40, 60, and 80 mm, respectively, on the bottom surface of the plate.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)An experiment is also performed using the setup in Figure5(b), for wave mode verification. Two PZT transducers (with dimensions of 7 × 7 × 0.2 mm) in a pitch-catch configuration are adopted. The distance between the two transducers is 150 mm. The excitation signal is 2.5-cycle tone bursts 100 kHz. Figure 10 plots a received signal with its Hilbert envelope, when the excitation frequency is 100 kHz. Using the received signal and the distance between two transducers, the group velocity of A0 mode is obtained, which is 1.85 mm/μs. Figure 11 compares the quasi-Scholte mode’s group velocities obtained from the theory, simulation, and experiment at 50, 100, and 150 kHz. The results of theory, simulation, and experiment agree well with each other.Figure 10
Experimental signal of guided waves in the plate with one side in water at 100 kHz.Figure 11
Comparison of quasi-Scholte mode’s group velocities obtained from theory, simulation, and experiment.


## 4. Water Level Sensing Using A0 and Quasi-Scholte Modes

This section presents a water level sensing method by using both A0 and quasi-Scholte modes. A pitch-catch sensing configuration with two PZT transducers is employed. For this configuration, a theoretical prediction of the relation between water level and wave travelling time is derived. For the proof of concept, a laboratory experiment is performed. The experimental results agree well with the theoretical predictions and show that the travelling time linearly increases with the increase of water level.


### 4.1. Theoretical Predictions

Figure12 plots a proposed pitch-catch configuration with two PZT transducers for water level sensing. The full wave propagation path (dT-R) consists of two parts: the water path dW and the dry path dT-R − dW. In the water path dW, the quasi-Scholte mode propagates in the plate with one side in water; in the dry path dT-R − dW, the A0 mode propagates in the free plate. When the water level changes, it will directly change the portions of dry path dT-R − dW and water path dW. The guided waves leave the excitation PZT as the quasi-Scholte mode in the water path dW and then are converted to the A0 mode in the dry path dT-R − dW. Therefore, the propagation time over the entire path dT-R is given by the following:
(6)tT‐R=dWcQS+dT‐R−dWcA0,where cQS is the quasi-Scholte mode group velocity, cA0 is the A0 mode group velocity, and tT-R is the propagation time over the entire propagation path dT-R. If dW = 0 is the baseline, when the water level dW changes, the relation between time difference ΔtT-R on the entire propagation path dT-R is given by the following expression:
(7)ΔtT‐R=dW1cQS−1cA0.Figure 12
A pitch-catch configuration with two PZT transducers for water level sensing.As seen in (7), the water level dW is linearly related to the time difference ΔtT-R.


### 4.2. Experimental Setup for Water Level Sensing

An experiment is performed using the configuration in Figure12. The plate is a 1.2 mm thick steel with material properties given in Table 1. Two PZT transducers (with dimensions of 7 × 7 × 0.2 mm) are bonded on the plate in a pitch-catch configuration with the distance of 100 mm. The excitation signal has 2.5-cycle tone bursts, generated by an arbitrary function generator (model: Tektronix AFG 3022). The amplitude of the excitation signal is 10 V, which is the maximum output of our function generator. With this amplitude, we can achieve the optimal signal-to-noise ratio within the capability of our current equipment. In this water level sensing test, the excitation frequency is selected at 130 kHz for the proof of concept. The guided waves excited by the actuator propagate along the plate. At the receiver, waves are measured by an oscilloscope (Tektronix TDS 2022B).


### 4.3. Data Analysis Using Pseudo Wigner-Vile Distribution (PWVD)

Time-frequency analysis is a description of a signal in the time and frequency domain, indicating the energy distribution of the signal in the time-frequency space [22–27]. For signal analysis, this study employs PWVD. The measured experimental signal at the 50 mm water level is used as an example. The received waveform at the 50 mm water level is given in Figure 13(a). The traveling time of the second wave packet is contributions of both the A0 and quasi-Scholte modes. Since the low-frequency A0 and quasi-Scholte modes are highly dispersive, this dispersive effect may influence the measurement of travelling time of a wave packet. To precisely determine the travelling time at a certain frequency, time-frequency analysis is needed. Figure 13(b) plots a 2D time-frequency distribution of the PWVD. Figure 13(c) plots an extracted PWVD result at 130 kHz. Hence, the travelling time of the second wave package at 130 kHz can be determined.Figure 13
Analysis of a received signal using the PWVD: (a) received signal at the water level of 50 mm, (b) the PWVD result in time-frequency domain, and (c) the result of PWVD at 130 kHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 4.4. Experimental Results

To investigate the relationship between the water level and the received signal, signals at the receiver are collected at a series of water levels from 0 mm to 100 mm with a step of 10 mm. Figure14(a) plots four representative signals when the water levels are 0, 30, 60, and 100 mm. As shown in Figure 14(a), with the increase of water level, the wave packet gradually shifts to the right, which means the travelling time gradually increases. Using the PWVD method, the traveling time and time difference ΔtT-R at 130 kHz are obtained. Figure 14(b) plots the derived time difference ΔtT-R with respect to water level dW. A linear fitting is applied to the experimental data. The fitting result is ΔtT‐R=0.034dW with the R2 value of 0.998, which is close to 1. This means that the experimental results are in a linear relationship. The theoretical prediction derived from (7) is ΔtT‐R=0.035dW, which is also plotted in Figure 14(b). The coefficient of the linear fitting is very close to that of the theoretical prediction with an error of 2.9%. In addition, it can be seen that the experimental result agrees well with the theoretical prediction. The error for water level sensing is less than 3.7 mm. The precision of our method could be influenced by several factors including sensor installation errors, structural damage (corrosion, rust, and crack), environmental conditions, errors of wave speeds, and errors of the time differences. The measuring range depends on the distance between the actuator and the receiver. In the current setup, the distance is 100 mm, and thus the measuring range is 0~100 mm.Figure 14
Experimental results. (a) Received waveforms at different water levels. (b) Water level sensing results. The linear fitting result shows that the water leveldW is in a linear relationship with the time difference ∆tT-R. In addition, experimental results agree well with the theoretical predictions.
(a)
(b)


## 4.1. Theoretical Predictions

Figure12 plots a proposed pitch-catch configuration with two PZT transducers for water level sensing. The full wave propagation path (dT-R) consists of two parts: the water path dW and the dry path dT-R − dW. In the water path dW, the quasi-Scholte mode propagates in the plate with one side in water; in the dry path dT-R − dW, the A0 mode propagates in the free plate. When the water level changes, it will directly change the portions of dry path dT-R − dW and water path dW. The guided waves leave the excitation PZT as the quasi-Scholte mode in the water path dW and then are converted to the A0 mode in the dry path dT-R − dW. Therefore, the propagation time over the entire path dT-R is given by the following:
(6)tT‐R=dWcQS+dT‐R−dWcA0,where cQS is the quasi-Scholte mode group velocity, cA0 is the A0 mode group velocity, and tT-R is the propagation time over the entire propagation path dT-R. If dW = 0 is the baseline, when the water level dW changes, the relation between time difference ΔtT-R on the entire propagation path dT-R is given by the following expression:
(7)ΔtT‐R=dW1cQS−1cA0.Figure 12
A pitch-catch configuration with two PZT transducers for water level sensing.As seen in (7), the water level dW is linearly related to the time difference ΔtT-R.


## 4.2. Experimental Setup for Water Level Sensing

An experiment is performed using the configuration in Figure12. The plate is a 1.2 mm thick steel with material properties given in Table 1. Two PZT transducers (with dimensions of 7 × 7 × 0.2 mm) are bonded on the plate in a pitch-catch configuration with the distance of 100 mm. The excitation signal has 2.5-cycle tone bursts, generated by an arbitrary function generator (model: Tektronix AFG 3022). The amplitude of the excitation signal is 10 V, which is the maximum output of our function generator. With this amplitude, we can achieve the optimal signal-to-noise ratio within the capability of our current equipment. In this water level sensing test, the excitation frequency is selected at 130 kHz for the proof of concept. The guided waves excited by the actuator propagate along the plate. At the receiver, waves are measured by an oscilloscope (Tektronix TDS 2022B).


## 4.3. Data Analysis Using Pseudo Wigner-Vile Distribution (PWVD)

Time-frequency analysis is a description of a signal in the time and frequency domain, indicating the energy distribution of the signal in the time-frequency space [22–27]. For signal analysis, this study employs PWVD. The measured experimental signal at the 50 mm water level is used as an example. The received waveform at the 50 mm water level is given in Figure 13(a). The traveling time of the second wave packet is contributions of both the A0 and quasi-Scholte modes. Since the low-frequency A0 and quasi-Scholte modes are highly dispersive, this dispersive effect may influence the measurement of travelling time of a wave packet. To precisely determine the travelling time at a certain frequency, time-frequency analysis is needed. Figure 13(b) plots a 2D time-frequency distribution of the PWVD. Figure 13(c) plots an extracted PWVD result at 130 kHz. Hence, the travelling time of the second wave package at 130 kHz can be determined.Figure 13
Analysis of a received signal using the PWVD: (a) received signal at the water level of 50 mm, (b) the PWVD result in time-frequency domain, and (c) the result of PWVD at 130 kHz.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 4.4. Experimental Results

To investigate the relationship between the water level and the received signal, signals at the receiver are collected at a series of water levels from 0 mm to 100 mm with a step of 10 mm. Figure14(a) plots four representative signals when the water levels are 0, 30, 60, and 100 mm. As shown in Figure 14(a), with the increase of water level, the wave packet gradually shifts to the right, which means the travelling time gradually increases. Using the PWVD method, the traveling time and time difference ΔtT-R at 130 kHz are obtained. Figure 14(b) plots the derived time difference ΔtT-R with respect to water level dW. A linear fitting is applied to the experimental data. The fitting result is ΔtT‐R=0.034dW with the R2 value of 0.998, which is close to 1. This means that the experimental results are in a linear relationship. The theoretical prediction derived from (7) is ΔtT‐R=0.035dW, which is also plotted in Figure 14(b). The coefficient of the linear fitting is very close to that of the theoretical prediction with an error of 2.9%. In addition, it can be seen that the experimental result agrees well with the theoretical prediction. The error for water level sensing is less than 3.7 mm. The precision of our method could be influenced by several factors including sensor installation errors, structural damage (corrosion, rust, and crack), environmental conditions, errors of wave speeds, and errors of the time differences. The measuring range depends on the distance between the actuator and the receiver. In the current setup, the distance is 100 mm, and thus the measuring range is 0~100 mm.Figure 14
Experimental results. (a) Received waveforms at different water levels. (b) Water level sensing results. The linear fitting result shows that the water leveldW is in a linear relationship with the time difference ∆tT-R. In addition, experimental results agree well with the theoretical predictions.
(a)
(b)


## 5. Conclusions

This paper presents a water level sensing method by using the A0 and quasi-Scholte modes. The water level sensing method adopts a pitch-catch sensing configuration with a pair of PZT transducers bonded on a steel vessel. The travelling time of guided waves between the two transducers is influenced by the water level. Hence, by measuring the travelling time, the water level in the vessel can be found.This study investigates the difference between guided waves in a free plate and a plate with one side. Through theoretical, numerical, and experimental studies, it is confirmed that the A0 mode presents in a free plate and the quasi-Scholte mode presents in a plate with one side in water at low frequencies. Moreover, the A0 mode can convert to the quasi-Scholte mode and vice versa. Lastly, the group velocity of the quasi-Scholte mode is smaller than that of the A0 mode. Based on these findings, a water level sensing method is developed, which takes the advantage of the group velocity difference between the quasi-Scholte and A0 modes.The water level sensing method adopts a pair of PZT transducers in the pitch-catch configuration bonded on the out surface of the vessel. When the water level is between the two transducers, the entire travelling path can be divided into two portions, the dry path (with A0 mode) and the water path (with quasi-Scholte mode). If the water level changes, the lengths of dry path and water path change; hence, the total travelling time changes. Based on this principle, the water level can be predicted by using the travelling time. For the proof of concept, we experimentally demonstrate water level sensing using guided waves. The experimental results show that wave travelling time linearly increases with the increase of water level and agree well with theoretical predictions.For our method, the sensing resolution could be influenced by the wave speed, sampling rate of the data acquisition equipment, and the smallest time difference that can be determined. The sensitivity could be influenced by the wave speed difference between the A0 mode and the quasi-Scholte mode. In the future, we will perform detailed parametric studies with both theoretical analysis and experiments, in order to characterize the sensing resolution and sensitivity, as well as identify the optimum frequency that can provide the best sensing resolution and sensitivity. For real-world applications, there are still some challenges. Our method could be influenced by structural damage (corrosion, rust, and crack), temperature fluctuation, and sensor degradation under harsh environmental conditions. In the future, we aim to develop a more robust system with these challenges considered for practical applications in power plants.



---

*Source: 2596291-2017-12-20.xml*