# Effect of Dry-Wet Cycling on the Mechanical Properties of High-Water Materials

Authors: X. L. Zhou; C. W. Liu; Y. Liu; C. Wang; Y. J. Ma
Journal: Advances in Civil Engineering
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

As a new grouting reinforcement material, high-water materials (HWMs) are being increasingly applied in different fields. This means that the environment in which these HWMs are employed are varied and increasingly complex. The dehydrating and saturation cycle of HWM caused by changes in the environment is referred to as the dry-wet cycle. To explore the influence of the dry-wet cycle on the mechanical properties of HWMs, uniaxial compression tests were performed on specimens with different water-to-cement ratios under different dry-wet cycles. The degradation rate of the peak stress and elastic modulus increased with an increase in the water-to-cement ratio. The failure mode of specimens changed from splitting failure to shear-splitting failure during the dry-wet cycle. The results of scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction showed that an HWM with a low water-to-cement ratio is relatively dense; therefore, the carbonization process is slow during dehydration. Raw materials were present after hydration and hardening reaction. Thus, the strength recovery ability is strong in materials with a low water-to-cement ratio during the saturation process. Finally, the experimental results can provide guidance for selecting materials with different water-to-cement ratios and control measures for dry-wet cycle can be determined according to different engineering environments.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

China has abundant coal reserves; however, many of these reserves are located underwater, buildings, and railways. With advancements in coal mining technology, the traditional mining method is gradually being replaced by filling mining [1, 2]. Gupta [3] reviewed the application of coal mine overburden (OB) dump material for backfilling in underground mine voids created due to coal mining in deep seams/horizons. Gibert [4] assessed the potential of municipal compost as a carbon source. Initial filling materials include gangue, concrete, and solid paste [5]. However, these materials have many shortcomings such as a complicated filling process, high investment cost, and poor effect of filling goaf. Until the 1980s, high-water materials (HWMs) were widely used in mine filling, which resolved the problems associated with traditional filling materials [6–8]. For example, Chen's research [9] showed that backfill satisfies the strength requirements and effectively controls the surface subsidence.Further improvements in production technology expanded the application of HWMs to gas drainage sealing, water shutoff, marine engineering, and soft soil foundation reinforcement [10, 11]. In addition to having the properties required of grouting materials, an HWM exhibits good fluidity, rapid setting, early strength, controllable setting time, and good impermeability that cement slurry lacks. The use of HWM is gradually changing from being filling materials to being grouting materials. The application environment of HWMs is thus being gradually transferred from underground to surface.However, when exposed to air, HWM tends to react with carbon dioxide, resulting in reduced strength and increased porosity [12]. Therefore, the durability of HWMs depends highly on environmental conditions. The increasing applications of HWMs in different fields means that the engineering environment in which these materials are employed are varied and increasingly complex. Alternating cycles of dehydration and saturation are commonly observed in HWM owing to a change in the level of underground water, river water, and water content of surrounding rocks. Furthermore, studies have found that HWMs dehydrate under pressure and saturate once the pressure is released [13]. The alternating dehydrating and saturation cycle of HWMs, caused by changes in the engineering environment, is referred to as the dry-wet cycle. The influence of the dry-wet cycle on rocks has been studied in depth; however, its influence on HWM has rarely been investigated [14–16]. For example, Shim [17] studied the self-healing properties of superabsorbent polymer (SAPs) gelling materials in eight wet/dry cycles. Some researchers have studied the mechanical properties and stability of rocks under the action of wet/dry cycles [18–20].In the past [13], the environment wherein HWMs is used as filling material was relatively stable; thus, research on HWM has mainly focused on topics such as hydration hardening mechanism, physical and mechanical properties, and long-term creep characteristics [21, 22]. More environmental factors should be considered for evaluating the stability of HWM as grouting materials. For example, the effect of dry-wet cycles caused by environmental change on the durability of HWM is very significant. However, there are few studies on the dry-wet cycle of HWMs. The durability of HWM as grouting materials depends highly on environmental conditions. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the mechanical properties of HWM with different water-cement ratios under the dry-wet cycle. The research results can guide the selection of practical engineering materials.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Preparation of Samples

An HWM is composed of two main materials, one of which contains A and A-A and the other contains B and B-B. The main composition of the four raw materials is listed in Table1.Table 1
Constitution and mass fraction of HWM.
Constitution
Semiquantitative (mass fraction)
A
CaO
⋅
3
Al
2
O
3
⋅
CaSO
4
76
2
CaO
⋅
SiO
2
24
A-A
Na
2
CO
3
6
SiO
2
69
BaBiO
3
25
B
CaSO
4
61
CaCO
3
12
CaSO
4
⋅
2
H
2
O
27
B-B
SiO
2
70
CaSO
4
30Currently, the water-to-cement ratio of HWMs commonly used in lab tests and field application varies between 2 : 1 and 7 : 1. A water-to-cement ratio of 2 : 1 implies that the weight of water is twice the sum of the weights of the four raw materials. To study the influence of the dry-wet cycle on the mechanical properties of HWMs, materials with water-to-cement ratios of 3 : 1, 4 : 1, and 5 : 1 were used in experiments. The ratio of the four raw materials A : A-A : B : B-B is 1 : 0.1 : 1:0.04.A thermometer was used to control the temperature of the test water at 20 ± 2°C. A measuring bucket was used to measure the amount of water. First, materials A and A-A were mixed in water for 5 min. The same procedure was followed for materials B and B-B. Then, the two groups of liquid were poured together. When the mixture was about to solidify, it is injected into a mold with dimensions of Φ50 mm × 100 mm. To improve the accuracy of the uniaxial compression test, the top of the specimens should be flat. Figure1 shows the molding and processing of the specimens.Figure 1
Specimen preparation.The specimens obtained were kept in water for 7 days, as shown in Figure2. The hydration and hardening process of specimens basically ended after this period. All the specimens were in the saturated state before dry-wet cycling tests were performed on them. To study the mechanical properties of HWMs during the dry-wet cycle, the saturated and dehydrated specimens were designed for each water-to-cement ratio. The saturated and dehydrated states were denoted by the letters B and S, respectively.Figure 2
Specimen curing.


### 2.2. Test Methods

After curing for 7 days, the specimens were taken out and placed indoor at a temperature of 25 ± 2°C for 24 h, which was recorded as a dehydrating process. Then, the specimens were placed in water at a temperature of 20 ± 2°C for another 24 h, which was recorded as a saturation process. Dehydration for 24 h and saturation for 24 h were recorded as a dry-wet cycle.For example, for a water-to-cement ratio of 3 : 1, there were twelve groups of specimens, and each group had three specimens. The first to sixth groups were used to study the saturated state, with the number of dry-wet cycles beingn = 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15, and numbered 3-B-0, 3-B-3, 3-B-6, 3-B-9, 3-B-12, and 3-B-15, respectively. The number 3-B-0 refers to a specimen in a saturated state after curing for 7 days. The remaining groups were used to study the dehydrating state, with the number of dry-wet cycles being n = 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15, and numbered 3-S-1, 3-S-3, 3-S-6, 3-S-9, 3-S-12, and 3-S-15, respectively. The number 3-S-1 represents a specimen in the dehydrating state after 24 h of curing. For the same number of dry-wet cycles, the test time of the saturated specimens is 24 h longer than that of the dehydrated specimens, that is, the dry-wet cycle test time of 3-S-1 and 3-B-1 is 24 h and 48 h, respectively. The marking and classification of samples are summarized in Table 2.Table 2
Number and classification of specimens.
Cycles
Saturated
Dehydrating
3 : 1
4 : 1
5 : 1
3 : 1
4 : 1
5 : 1
0
3
3
3
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
9
3
3
3
3
3
3
12
3
3
3
3
3
3
15
3
3
3
3
3
3A uniaxial compression test was performed on the specimens by using the ETM mechanical experimental system. The loading method was controlled by displacement, and the loading speed was 3 mm·min−1. The microstructure and composition of the specimens with different dry-wet cycles were analyzed by SEM and XRD.


## 2.1. Preparation of Samples

An HWM is composed of two main materials, one of which contains A and A-A and the other contains B and B-B. The main composition of the four raw materials is listed in Table1.Table 1
Constitution and mass fraction of HWM.
Constitution
Semiquantitative (mass fraction)
A
CaO
⋅
3
Al
2
O
3
⋅
CaSO
4
76
2
CaO
⋅
SiO
2
24
A-A
Na
2
CO
3
6
SiO
2
69
BaBiO
3
25
B
CaSO
4
61
CaCO
3
12
CaSO
4
⋅
2
H
2
O
27
B-B
SiO
2
70
CaSO
4
30Currently, the water-to-cement ratio of HWMs commonly used in lab tests and field application varies between 2 : 1 and 7 : 1. A water-to-cement ratio of 2 : 1 implies that the weight of water is twice the sum of the weights of the four raw materials. To study the influence of the dry-wet cycle on the mechanical properties of HWMs, materials with water-to-cement ratios of 3 : 1, 4 : 1, and 5 : 1 were used in experiments. The ratio of the four raw materials A : A-A : B : B-B is 1 : 0.1 : 1:0.04.A thermometer was used to control the temperature of the test water at 20 ± 2°C. A measuring bucket was used to measure the amount of water. First, materials A and A-A were mixed in water for 5 min. The same procedure was followed for materials B and B-B. Then, the two groups of liquid were poured together. When the mixture was about to solidify, it is injected into a mold with dimensions of Φ50 mm × 100 mm. To improve the accuracy of the uniaxial compression test, the top of the specimens should be flat. Figure1 shows the molding and processing of the specimens.Figure 1
Specimen preparation.The specimens obtained were kept in water for 7 days, as shown in Figure2. The hydration and hardening process of specimens basically ended after this period. All the specimens were in the saturated state before dry-wet cycling tests were performed on them. To study the mechanical properties of HWMs during the dry-wet cycle, the saturated and dehydrated specimens were designed for each water-to-cement ratio. The saturated and dehydrated states were denoted by the letters B and S, respectively.Figure 2
Specimen curing.


## 2.2. Test Methods

After curing for 7 days, the specimens were taken out and placed indoor at a temperature of 25 ± 2°C for 24 h, which was recorded as a dehydrating process. Then, the specimens were placed in water at a temperature of 20 ± 2°C for another 24 h, which was recorded as a saturation process. Dehydration for 24 h and saturation for 24 h were recorded as a dry-wet cycle.For example, for a water-to-cement ratio of 3 : 1, there were twelve groups of specimens, and each group had three specimens. The first to sixth groups were used to study the saturated state, with the number of dry-wet cycles beingn = 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15, and numbered 3-B-0, 3-B-3, 3-B-6, 3-B-9, 3-B-12, and 3-B-15, respectively. The number 3-B-0 refers to a specimen in a saturated state after curing for 7 days. The remaining groups were used to study the dehydrating state, with the number of dry-wet cycles being n = 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15, and numbered 3-S-1, 3-S-3, 3-S-6, 3-S-9, 3-S-12, and 3-S-15, respectively. The number 3-S-1 represents a specimen in the dehydrating state after 24 h of curing. For the same number of dry-wet cycles, the test time of the saturated specimens is 24 h longer than that of the dehydrated specimens, that is, the dry-wet cycle test time of 3-S-1 and 3-B-1 is 24 h and 48 h, respectively. The marking and classification of samples are summarized in Table 2.Table 2
Number and classification of specimens.
Cycles
Saturated
Dehydrating
3 : 1
4 : 1
5 : 1
3 : 1
4 : 1
5 : 1
0
3
3
3
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
9
3
3
3
3
3
3
12
3
3
3
3
3
3
15
3
3
3
3
3
3A uniaxial compression test was performed on the specimens by using the ETM mechanical experimental system. The loading method was controlled by displacement, and the loading speed was 3 mm·min−1. The microstructure and composition of the specimens with different dry-wet cycles were analyzed by SEM and XRD.


## 3. Results

The stress-strain curve is an important index to reflect the deformation and failure process of HWM. The typical stress-strain curve of the HWMs was analyzed using the stress-strain curve of 3-B-0. As shown in Figure3, the deformation and failure process of the specimens can be divided into the following four processes.Figure 3
Typical stress-strain curves of the HWM.OA is the first stage and is referred to as the pore compaction stage. The pores in the specimen were compacted, and there was no change in appearance at this stage. The second stage, represented by AB, was the elastic stage. The main feature of this stage is the appearance of water droplets on the surface. The next stage is BC, or the yield stage, where the water inside the specimens was removed in large quantities. Cracks began to appear on the surface of the specimen at this stage. Cracks on the surface of the specimen grew rapidly in the last stage, i.e., the failure stage CD. The stress-strain curve decreased gradually until the residual strength was reached. As an elastoplastic body, HWMs have high residual strength.The most representative stress-strain curve of each group of three specimens was selected to study the basic mechanical characteristics. The stress-strain curves of specimens with different water-to-cement ratios under different dry-wet cycles are shown in Figure4. As can be seen from Figure 4, the shape of each curve is roughly the same, that is, it consists of the four stages mentioned above. The shape of the curves in Figure 4 shows that the materials were still elastic-plastic after the dry-wet cycles. However, the samples show different peak stresses, residual strengths, and peak strains under different dry-wet cycles. When the water-cement ratio was 3 : 1, the peak stress and residual strength of the samples increased with an increasing number of dry-wet cycles. When the water-cement ratio was 4 : 1, the peak stress and residual strength of the samples increased first and then decreased with an increasing number of dry-wet cycles. When the water-cement ratio was 5 : 1, the peak stress and residual strength of the samples decreased with an increasing number of dry-wet cycles. As shown in Figure 4, with the increase of water-cement ratio, the rate of declining stress after its peak decreased gradually. Therefore, the water-cement ratio is directly proportional to the plasticity of the materials.Figure 4
Stress-strain curves of specimens under different dry-wet cycles: (a) 3 : 1 saturated; (b) 3 : 1 dehydrated; (c) 4 : 1 saturated; (d) 4 : 1 dehydrated; (e) 5 : 1 saturated; (f) 5 : 1 dehydrated.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


### 3.1. Peak Stress Analysis

The peak stress of an HWM can be represented by its uniaxial compressive stressσc. It shows the stress value corresponding to the highest point of the stress-strain curve, as shown in Figure 3. The peak stress is calculated as follows:(1)σc=PA,where σc is the peak stress, P is the maximum load applied to compress the specimen, and A is the compression area of the specimen, which is 1963.5 mm2. Table 3 lists the peak stress of specimens with different water-to-cement ratios under different dry-wet cycles. The peak stress listed in Table 3 is the average value of 3 specimens in each group.Table 3
Average peak stress and elastic modulus of specimens under different dry-wet cycles.
State
Cycles
Peak stress (MPa)
Elastic modulus (MPa)
3 : 1
4 : 1
5 : 1
3 : 1
4 : 1
5 : 1
Saturated
0
1.58
0.89
0.57
174
95
76
3
1.65
0.95
0.51
180
106
63
6
1.73
0.98
0.46
196
121
54
9
1.78
0.95
0.42
210
109
49
12
1.80
0.9
0.36
239
106
44
15
1.78
0.87
0.32
200
90
40
Dehydrating
1
1.48
0.83
0.51
148
90
65
3
1.56
0.87
0.47
175
92
60
6
1.68
0.91
0.42
187
110
52
9
1.72
0.84
0.38
197
91
48
12
1.75
0.78
0.35
218
88
42
15
1.73
0.72
0.31
182
85
34At a water-to-cement ratio of 3 : 1, the peak stress in the saturated state is 1.58, 1.65, 1.73, 1.78, 1.80, and 1.78 MPa when the number of dry-wet cycles is 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15, respectively. At the same water-to-cement ratio, the peak stress in the dehydrated state is 1.48, 1.56, 1.68, 1.72, 1.75, and 1.73 MPa when the number of dry-wet cycles of 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15, respectively. The peak stress in both the states first increased and then decreased with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles. The peak stress is maximum when the number of dry-wet cycles is 12. In the saturated state, as the number of dry-wet cycles increased from 0 to 15, the peak stress of the specimens increased by 4.4% (n = 3), 9.5% (n = 6), 12.7% (n = 9), 13.9% (n = 12), and 12.7% (n = 15). In the dehydrated state, as the number of dry-wet cycles increased from 1 to 15, the peak strength of the specimens increased by 5.4% (n = 3), 13.5% (n = 6), 16.2% (n = 9), 18.2% (n = 12), and 16.9% (n = 15). For the same number of dry-wet cycles, the peak stress of specimens in the dehydrated state is lower than that in the saturated state. HWMs recover strength by absorbing water and lose strength by losing water.The tendency of the peak stress changing with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles for specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1 is similar to that of specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 3 : 1. The peak stress is the maximum when the number of dry-wet cycles is 6. Similar to the trend observed for a water-to-cement ratio of 3 : 1, the peak stress in the dehydrated state is lower than that in the saturated state under the same number of dry-wet cycle.Unlike the trend observed at water-to-cement ratios of 3 : 1 and 4 : 1, the peak stress decreased with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles when the water-to-cement ratio is 5 : 1. In the saturated state, as the number of dry-wet cycles increased from 0 to 15, the peak strength of the specimens decreased by 10.5% (n = 3), 19.3% (n = 6), 26.3%(n = 9), 36.8%(n = 12), and 43.9%(n = 15). In the dehydrated state, as the number of dry-wet cycles increased from 1 to 15, the peak stress of the specimens decreased by 7.8% (n = 3), 17.6% (n = 6), 25.5%(n = 9), 31.4%(n = 12), and 39.2%(n = 15).It can be seen from the above results that, with an increase in the water-to-cement ratio, the adverse effect of dry-wet cycle on the HWM was more obvious. To intuitively understand the impact of the dry-wet cycle on the strength of HWMs, the relationship between the peak stress and dry-wet cycles was fitted by a curve (Figure5).Figure 5
Relationship between peak stress and dry-wet cycles: (a) 3 : 1, (b) 4 : 1, and (c) 5 : 1.
(a)
(b)
(c)When the water-to-cement ratio was 3 : 1, quadratic polynomial was adopted for curve fitting. The fitting curve equations are given as follows:(2)σcsaturated=1.57179+0.03482n−0.00137n2,R2=0.98302,σcdehydrating=1.42678+0.05353n−0.00222n2,R2=0.9922.When the water-to-cement ratio was 4 : 1, cubic polynomial was adopted for curve fitting. The fitting curve equations are given as follows:(3)σcsaturated=0.88722+0.0359n−0.00438n2+0.000127n3,R2=0.94678,σcdehydrating=0.7774+0.05466n−0.00714n2+0.000216n3,R2=0.94553.When the water-to-cement ratio was 5 : 1, linear fitting was adopted for curve fitting. The fitting curve equations are given as follows:(4)σcsaturated=0.564−0.01n,R2=0.99829,σcdehydrating=0.51347−0.0139n,R2=0.98581.


### 3.2. Elastic Modulus Analysis

Elastic modulus is an important indicator of a material’s engineering properties. From a macroscopic point of view, elastic modulus is a measure of an object’s resistance to elastic deformation. However, from a microscopic view, elastic modulus represents the bond strength between molecules. In this paper, the tangent modulus of the elastic segment of the stress-strain curve is defined as the elastic modulus. The elastic modulus is calculated by the following equation:(5)E=σ2−σ1ε2−ε1,where E is the elastic modulus, σ1 and σ2 are the stress values corresponding to the starting point A and end point B of the elastic stage, respectively, and ε1 and ε2 are the strain values corresponding to the starting point A and end point B of the elastic stage, respectively. The relationship between the elastic modulus and dry-wet cycles is shown in Figure 6.Figure 6
Relationship between elastic modulus and dry-wet cycles.The elastic modulus of the specimens at the three water-to-cement ratios changed in the same trend as the peak stress with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles. When the water-to-cement ratio was 3 : 1, the elastic modulus for the two states increased initially before reaching a peak at 12 dry-wet cycles. After that, it experienced a moderate decrease. The tendency of the elastic modulus changing with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles for specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1 is similar to that of specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 3 : 1 ratio. When the number of dry-wet cycles was 6, the elastic modulus was the maximum. However, when the water-cement ratio was 5 : 1, the elastic modulus of the two states decreased with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles.This significant change in the elastic modulus for different numbers of dry-wet cycles indicated that the deformation resistance of HWMs with different water-to-cement ratios varies considerably under the dry-wet cycle. HWMs with smaller water-to-cement ratios have lower porosity and stronger strength recovery ability. Thus, the degradation rate of elastic modulus increased with an increase in the water-to-cement ratio.


### 3.3. Macroscopic Damage Analysis

Figure7 shows the saturated specimens under different dry-wet cycles with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1. It was found that the surface of an HWM would be damaged with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles. Taking the saturated specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1 as an example, when the number of dry-wet cycles was 6, damage was observed the surface of the specimens, where the peak stress was the maximum. The specimens in the dehydrated state were the same as those in saturated. When the water-to-cement ratio was 3 : 1, damage was observed on the surface of the specimens when the number of dry-wet cycles was 12. However, when the water-to-cement ratio was 5 : 1, damage was observed on the specimen at the beginning of the dry-wet cycle. It can be seen that the degree of surface damage on the specimens corresponds to a decrease in peak stress.Figure 7
Saturated specimens under different dry-wet cycles.Corrosion failure of the specimen was the result of the combined action of carbonation and water erosion. The carbonized product was powder, which would fall off in water. As shown in Figure7, the corrosion damage first appeared on the surface and gradually developed inside the samples. With the increase of the dry-wet cycle time, the corrosion effect was more obvious, and the corrosion products fall off more widely.Figure8 shows the saturated specimens at three water-to-cement ratios for the same number of dry-wet cycles. It can be found that the higher the water-to-cement ratio, the more obvious the damage caused by the dry-wet cycle. The water-cement ratio of the sample is directly proportional to the porosity and free-water content. Therefore, carbonation and corrosion failure of samples are more likely to occur with a high water-cement ratio. HWMs with low water-cement ratio have better resistance against dry-wet cycles. In engineering, the appropriate water-cement ratio can be selected according to the severity of the environment.Figure 8
Saturated specimens with different water-to-cement ratios under the same number of dry-wet cycles.The experiments indicated that HWMs had different failure modes for different numbers of dry-wet cycles. Figure9 shows the failure morphology diagram of the saturated specimens with different numbers of dry-wet cycles with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1. Failure modes can be divided into the following two categories based on whether the specimen was corrosion damaged or not. When the specimens were not damaged, the failure mode of the specimens was splitting failure; otherwise, it was shear-splitting failure. The failure mode of the specimens in the dehydrated state was the same as those in the saturated state. Similarly, when the number of dry-wet cycles was less than 12, the failure mode of the specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 3 : 1 was splitting failure; otherwise, the failure mode was shear-splitting failure. However, all the specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 5 : 1 exhibited shear-splitting failure.Figure 9
Failure morphology diagram of saturated specimens under different dry-wet cycles with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1.HWM exhibits good homogeneity. The crack at the end of the specimen can form a through crack, which is called splitting failure. The corrosion damage caused by the dry-wet cycles changed the homogeneity of the samples. A weak plane structure would be formed in the area with serious corrosion damage. When the specimens were damaged under compression, an inclined crack would appear in the weak plane structure. The failure mode with inclined crack and through crack is called shear-splitting failure.


## 3.1. Peak Stress Analysis

The peak stress of an HWM can be represented by its uniaxial compressive stressσc. It shows the stress value corresponding to the highest point of the stress-strain curve, as shown in Figure 3. The peak stress is calculated as follows:(1)σc=PA,where σc is the peak stress, P is the maximum load applied to compress the specimen, and A is the compression area of the specimen, which is 1963.5 mm2. Table 3 lists the peak stress of specimens with different water-to-cement ratios under different dry-wet cycles. The peak stress listed in Table 3 is the average value of 3 specimens in each group.Table 3
Average peak stress and elastic modulus of specimens under different dry-wet cycles.
State
Cycles
Peak stress (MPa)
Elastic modulus (MPa)
3 : 1
4 : 1
5 : 1
3 : 1
4 : 1
5 : 1
Saturated
0
1.58
0.89
0.57
174
95
76
3
1.65
0.95
0.51
180
106
63
6
1.73
0.98
0.46
196
121
54
9
1.78
0.95
0.42
210
109
49
12
1.80
0.9
0.36
239
106
44
15
1.78
0.87
0.32
200
90
40
Dehydrating
1
1.48
0.83
0.51
148
90
65
3
1.56
0.87
0.47
175
92
60
6
1.68
0.91
0.42
187
110
52
9
1.72
0.84
0.38
197
91
48
12
1.75
0.78
0.35
218
88
42
15
1.73
0.72
0.31
182
85
34At a water-to-cement ratio of 3 : 1, the peak stress in the saturated state is 1.58, 1.65, 1.73, 1.78, 1.80, and 1.78 MPa when the number of dry-wet cycles is 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15, respectively. At the same water-to-cement ratio, the peak stress in the dehydrated state is 1.48, 1.56, 1.68, 1.72, 1.75, and 1.73 MPa when the number of dry-wet cycles of 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15, respectively. The peak stress in both the states first increased and then decreased with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles. The peak stress is maximum when the number of dry-wet cycles is 12. In the saturated state, as the number of dry-wet cycles increased from 0 to 15, the peak stress of the specimens increased by 4.4% (n = 3), 9.5% (n = 6), 12.7% (n = 9), 13.9% (n = 12), and 12.7% (n = 15). In the dehydrated state, as the number of dry-wet cycles increased from 1 to 15, the peak strength of the specimens increased by 5.4% (n = 3), 13.5% (n = 6), 16.2% (n = 9), 18.2% (n = 12), and 16.9% (n = 15). For the same number of dry-wet cycles, the peak stress of specimens in the dehydrated state is lower than that in the saturated state. HWMs recover strength by absorbing water and lose strength by losing water.The tendency of the peak stress changing with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles for specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1 is similar to that of specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 3 : 1. The peak stress is the maximum when the number of dry-wet cycles is 6. Similar to the trend observed for a water-to-cement ratio of 3 : 1, the peak stress in the dehydrated state is lower than that in the saturated state under the same number of dry-wet cycle.Unlike the trend observed at water-to-cement ratios of 3 : 1 and 4 : 1, the peak stress decreased with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles when the water-to-cement ratio is 5 : 1. In the saturated state, as the number of dry-wet cycles increased from 0 to 15, the peak strength of the specimens decreased by 10.5% (n = 3), 19.3% (n = 6), 26.3%(n = 9), 36.8%(n = 12), and 43.9%(n = 15). In the dehydrated state, as the number of dry-wet cycles increased from 1 to 15, the peak stress of the specimens decreased by 7.8% (n = 3), 17.6% (n = 6), 25.5%(n = 9), 31.4%(n = 12), and 39.2%(n = 15).It can be seen from the above results that, with an increase in the water-to-cement ratio, the adverse effect of dry-wet cycle on the HWM was more obvious. To intuitively understand the impact of the dry-wet cycle on the strength of HWMs, the relationship between the peak stress and dry-wet cycles was fitted by a curve (Figure5).Figure 5
Relationship between peak stress and dry-wet cycles: (a) 3 : 1, (b) 4 : 1, and (c) 5 : 1.
(a)
(b)
(c)When the water-to-cement ratio was 3 : 1, quadratic polynomial was adopted for curve fitting. The fitting curve equations are given as follows:(2)σcsaturated=1.57179+0.03482n−0.00137n2,R2=0.98302,σcdehydrating=1.42678+0.05353n−0.00222n2,R2=0.9922.When the water-to-cement ratio was 4 : 1, cubic polynomial was adopted for curve fitting. The fitting curve equations are given as follows:(3)σcsaturated=0.88722+0.0359n−0.00438n2+0.000127n3,R2=0.94678,σcdehydrating=0.7774+0.05466n−0.00714n2+0.000216n3,R2=0.94553.When the water-to-cement ratio was 5 : 1, linear fitting was adopted for curve fitting. The fitting curve equations are given as follows:(4)σcsaturated=0.564−0.01n,R2=0.99829,σcdehydrating=0.51347−0.0139n,R2=0.98581.


## 3.2. Elastic Modulus Analysis

Elastic modulus is an important indicator of a material’s engineering properties. From a macroscopic point of view, elastic modulus is a measure of an object’s resistance to elastic deformation. However, from a microscopic view, elastic modulus represents the bond strength between molecules. In this paper, the tangent modulus of the elastic segment of the stress-strain curve is defined as the elastic modulus. The elastic modulus is calculated by the following equation:(5)E=σ2−σ1ε2−ε1,where E is the elastic modulus, σ1 and σ2 are the stress values corresponding to the starting point A and end point B of the elastic stage, respectively, and ε1 and ε2 are the strain values corresponding to the starting point A and end point B of the elastic stage, respectively. The relationship between the elastic modulus and dry-wet cycles is shown in Figure 6.Figure 6
Relationship between elastic modulus and dry-wet cycles.The elastic modulus of the specimens at the three water-to-cement ratios changed in the same trend as the peak stress with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles. When the water-to-cement ratio was 3 : 1, the elastic modulus for the two states increased initially before reaching a peak at 12 dry-wet cycles. After that, it experienced a moderate decrease. The tendency of the elastic modulus changing with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles for specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1 is similar to that of specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 3 : 1 ratio. When the number of dry-wet cycles was 6, the elastic modulus was the maximum. However, when the water-cement ratio was 5 : 1, the elastic modulus of the two states decreased with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles.This significant change in the elastic modulus for different numbers of dry-wet cycles indicated that the deformation resistance of HWMs with different water-to-cement ratios varies considerably under the dry-wet cycle. HWMs with smaller water-to-cement ratios have lower porosity and stronger strength recovery ability. Thus, the degradation rate of elastic modulus increased with an increase in the water-to-cement ratio.


## 3.3. Macroscopic Damage Analysis

Figure7 shows the saturated specimens under different dry-wet cycles with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1. It was found that the surface of an HWM would be damaged with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles. Taking the saturated specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1 as an example, when the number of dry-wet cycles was 6, damage was observed the surface of the specimens, where the peak stress was the maximum. The specimens in the dehydrated state were the same as those in saturated. When the water-to-cement ratio was 3 : 1, damage was observed on the surface of the specimens when the number of dry-wet cycles was 12. However, when the water-to-cement ratio was 5 : 1, damage was observed on the specimen at the beginning of the dry-wet cycle. It can be seen that the degree of surface damage on the specimens corresponds to a decrease in peak stress.Figure 7
Saturated specimens under different dry-wet cycles.Corrosion failure of the specimen was the result of the combined action of carbonation and water erosion. The carbonized product was powder, which would fall off in water. As shown in Figure7, the corrosion damage first appeared on the surface and gradually developed inside the samples. With the increase of the dry-wet cycle time, the corrosion effect was more obvious, and the corrosion products fall off more widely.Figure8 shows the saturated specimens at three water-to-cement ratios for the same number of dry-wet cycles. It can be found that the higher the water-to-cement ratio, the more obvious the damage caused by the dry-wet cycle. The water-cement ratio of the sample is directly proportional to the porosity and free-water content. Therefore, carbonation and corrosion failure of samples are more likely to occur with a high water-cement ratio. HWMs with low water-cement ratio have better resistance against dry-wet cycles. In engineering, the appropriate water-cement ratio can be selected according to the severity of the environment.Figure 8
Saturated specimens with different water-to-cement ratios under the same number of dry-wet cycles.The experiments indicated that HWMs had different failure modes for different numbers of dry-wet cycles. Figure9 shows the failure morphology diagram of the saturated specimens with different numbers of dry-wet cycles with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1. Failure modes can be divided into the following two categories based on whether the specimen was corrosion damaged or not. When the specimens were not damaged, the failure mode of the specimens was splitting failure; otherwise, it was shear-splitting failure. The failure mode of the specimens in the dehydrated state was the same as those in the saturated state. Similarly, when the number of dry-wet cycles was less than 12, the failure mode of the specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 3 : 1 was splitting failure; otherwise, the failure mode was shear-splitting failure. However, all the specimens with a water-to-cement ratio of 5 : 1 exhibited shear-splitting failure.Figure 9
Failure morphology diagram of saturated specimens under different dry-wet cycles with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1.HWM exhibits good homogeneity. The crack at the end of the specimen can form a through crack, which is called splitting failure. The corrosion damage caused by the dry-wet cycles changed the homogeneity of the samples. A weak plane structure would be formed in the area with serious corrosion damage. When the specimens were damaged under compression, an inclined crack would appear in the weak plane structure. The failure mode with inclined crack and through crack is called shear-splitting failure.


## 4. Microscopic Analysis

### 4.1. Analysis of Dry-Wet Cycle Mechanism

The main component of HWMs is ettringite crystal, whose chemical formula is expressed as3CaO⋅Al2O3⋅3CaSO4⋅32H2O. The study found that the amount of ettringite in HWM would decrease with an increase in the water-to-cement ratio, and the internal structure would become loose [13]. In this study, an HWM with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1 was selected for microscopic analysis.The HWM not only lost some of their free water but also reacted with carbon dioxide in a dehydration process called carbonization. The degree of carbonization gradually decreased from the surface toward the center of the specimen. Therefore, the specimen would have the structure weathering layer-transition layer-unweathered layer after the dry-wet cycle.It can be seen from Table3 that the strength of the specimens decreased after a dehydration process. Two reasons can be attributed to this phenomenon. First, the specimens would lose some free water, resulting in increased porosity of the specimens. On the other hand, a part of ettringite, which contributes toward strength, reacted with carbon dioxide [23]. Based on the amount of humidity present in air, there are two main carbonization processes.When the humidity is higher, the carbonization process is represented by the following equation:(6)3CaO⋅Al2O3⋅CaSO4⋅32H2O+3CO2+H2O⟶CaSO4⋅2H2O+3CaCO3+Al2O3⋅H2O+30H2OWhen humidity is lower, carbon dioxide reacted directly with ettringite, as represented by the following equation:(7)3CaO⋅Al2O3⋅CaSO4⋅32H2O+3CO2⟶CaSO4⋅2H2O+3CaCO3+2AlOH3+27H2OIt can also be seen from Table3 that the strength of the saturated specimens was higher than that of dehydrated specimens for the same number of dry-wet cycles. The main reason for strength recovery after water absorption was that the increase in porosity provided sufficient space for ettringite formation. Ettringite is regenerated through two processes: the remaining raw materials in the specimens continue to react to form ettringite, and calcium carbonate and other substances are converted into ettringite. The continuous reaction of the remaining raw materials is the main factor for strength regeneration of HWMs. As the water-to-cement ratio decreases, the amount of raw materials increases. Thus, strength recovery is more obvious. The strength regeneration process is consistent with the hydration hardening mechanism of HWM, as represented by the following equations [24]:(8)3CaO⋅3Al2O3⋅CaSO4+2CaSO4⋅2H2O+34H2O⟶3CaO⋅Al2O3⋅3CaSO4⋅32H2O+2Al2O3⋅3H2Ogel(9)Al2O3⋅3H2Ogel+3CaOH2+3CaSO4⋅2H2O+20H2O⟶3CaO⋅Al2O3⋅3CaSO4⋅32H2OTo verify the above mechanism, XRD phase analysis was performed on materials with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1 in different states. Figure10 shows that, with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles, the degree of carbonization on the specimens’ surface is greater than that on the specimens’ center. It can also be seen that the calcium carbonate content decreased and ettringite content increased after a water absorption process. The results shown in Figure 10 are consistent with those of the above analysis of the dry-wet cycle mechanism.Figure 10
XRD phase analysis of HWM in different states: (a) 4-B-0; (b) the internal of 4-B-12; (c) the surface of 4-B-12; (d) the surface of 4-S-12.


### 4.2. Microstructure of HWM

Ettringite crystal is a network structure, which not only contains a large amount of bound water but can also absorb a large amount of free water. With an increase in the water-to-cement ratio, the amount of ettringite crystal in HWM decreases, and the structure becomes more loose, which will increase moisture content and decrease strength [25, 26].Figure11 shows the microscopic morphology of the unweathered layer at different magnifications after 12 dry-wet cycles, which is consistent with the results shown in Figure 9. The unweathered layer contains various substances, mainly ettringite with a columnar structure. Figure 12 shows the micromorphology of the surface of specimens in the dehydrated state and saturated state after 12 dry-wet cycles. Figure 12(a) shows almost entirely lumpy calcium carbonate with coarse pores that almost lose their carrying capacity. Some amount of ettringite is formed, and the pores are significantly reduced and shrunk, thus enhancing strength in Figure 12(b).Figure 11
SEM images of the internal of 4-B-12: (a) 14000 times, (b) 26000 times, and (c) 100000 times.Figure 12
SEM images of the surface of (a) 4-S-12 (26000 times) and (b) 4-B-12 (26000 times).


## 4.1. Analysis of Dry-Wet Cycle Mechanism

The main component of HWMs is ettringite crystal, whose chemical formula is expressed as3CaO⋅Al2O3⋅3CaSO4⋅32H2O. The study found that the amount of ettringite in HWM would decrease with an increase in the water-to-cement ratio, and the internal structure would become loose [13]. In this study, an HWM with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1 was selected for microscopic analysis.The HWM not only lost some of their free water but also reacted with carbon dioxide in a dehydration process called carbonization. The degree of carbonization gradually decreased from the surface toward the center of the specimen. Therefore, the specimen would have the structure weathering layer-transition layer-unweathered layer after the dry-wet cycle.It can be seen from Table3 that the strength of the specimens decreased after a dehydration process. Two reasons can be attributed to this phenomenon. First, the specimens would lose some free water, resulting in increased porosity of the specimens. On the other hand, a part of ettringite, which contributes toward strength, reacted with carbon dioxide [23]. Based on the amount of humidity present in air, there are two main carbonization processes.When the humidity is higher, the carbonization process is represented by the following equation:(6)3CaO⋅Al2O3⋅CaSO4⋅32H2O+3CO2+H2O⟶CaSO4⋅2H2O+3CaCO3+Al2O3⋅H2O+30H2OWhen humidity is lower, carbon dioxide reacted directly with ettringite, as represented by the following equation:(7)3CaO⋅Al2O3⋅CaSO4⋅32H2O+3CO2⟶CaSO4⋅2H2O+3CaCO3+2AlOH3+27H2OIt can also be seen from Table3 that the strength of the saturated specimens was higher than that of dehydrated specimens for the same number of dry-wet cycles. The main reason for strength recovery after water absorption was that the increase in porosity provided sufficient space for ettringite formation. Ettringite is regenerated through two processes: the remaining raw materials in the specimens continue to react to form ettringite, and calcium carbonate and other substances are converted into ettringite. The continuous reaction of the remaining raw materials is the main factor for strength regeneration of HWMs. As the water-to-cement ratio decreases, the amount of raw materials increases. Thus, strength recovery is more obvious. The strength regeneration process is consistent with the hydration hardening mechanism of HWM, as represented by the following equations [24]:(8)3CaO⋅3Al2O3⋅CaSO4+2CaSO4⋅2H2O+34H2O⟶3CaO⋅Al2O3⋅3CaSO4⋅32H2O+2Al2O3⋅3H2Ogel(9)Al2O3⋅3H2Ogel+3CaOH2+3CaSO4⋅2H2O+20H2O⟶3CaO⋅Al2O3⋅3CaSO4⋅32H2OTo verify the above mechanism, XRD phase analysis was performed on materials with a water-to-cement ratio of 4 : 1 in different states. Figure10 shows that, with an increase in the number of dry-wet cycles, the degree of carbonization on the specimens’ surface is greater than that on the specimens’ center. It can also be seen that the calcium carbonate content decreased and ettringite content increased after a water absorption process. The results shown in Figure 10 are consistent with those of the above analysis of the dry-wet cycle mechanism.Figure 10
XRD phase analysis of HWM in different states: (a) 4-B-0; (b) the internal of 4-B-12; (c) the surface of 4-B-12; (d) the surface of 4-S-12.


## 4.2. Microstructure of HWM

Ettringite crystal is a network structure, which not only contains a large amount of bound water but can also absorb a large amount of free water. With an increase in the water-to-cement ratio, the amount of ettringite crystal in HWM decreases, and the structure becomes more loose, which will increase moisture content and decrease strength [25, 26].Figure11 shows the microscopic morphology of the unweathered layer at different magnifications after 12 dry-wet cycles, which is consistent with the results shown in Figure 9. The unweathered layer contains various substances, mainly ettringite with a columnar structure. Figure 12 shows the micromorphology of the surface of specimens in the dehydrated state and saturated state after 12 dry-wet cycles. Figure 12(a) shows almost entirely lumpy calcium carbonate with coarse pores that almost lose their carrying capacity. Some amount of ettringite is formed, and the pores are significantly reduced and shrunk, thus enhancing strength in Figure 12(b).Figure 11
SEM images of the internal of 4-B-12: (a) 14000 times, (b) 26000 times, and (c) 100000 times.Figure 12
SEM images of the surface of (a) 4-S-12 (26000 times) and (b) 4-B-12 (26000 times).


## 5. Conclusions

By experimenting with ETM machine, SEM, and XRD technology, the mechanical properties and microchange mechanism of HWM at different water-cement ratios were thoroughly investigated under the specified dry-wet cycles. The effect of the dry-wet cycles on HMW’s peak stress, elastic modulus, and failure mode was obvious.For HWM with water-cement ratios of 3 : 1 and 4 : 1, the peak stress and elastic modulus both first increased with an increasing number of dry-wet cycles before starting to decrease after 12 and 6 dry-wet cycles, respectively. However, the HWM with a water-to-cement ratio of 5 : 1 displayed a different tendency from the former two scenarios, which is that the two parameters, peak stress and elastic modulus, never exhibited tendency change but decreased all the way with increasing dry-wet cycles. Hence, the maximum of peak stress and elastic modulus was observed when there was no dry-wet cycle. For all the specimens, as the peak stress decreased from the maximum value, the failure mode also changed from splitting failure to shear-splitting failure.From a microscopic point of view, carbonization reaction during dehydration and strength regeneration during saturation were the main factors leading to a change in the strength of the specimens. With an increasing number of water-cement ratios, the porosity and the remaining raw materials of the specimens increased and decreased, respectively. Therefore, different water-cement ratios have different dry-wet cycle effects, namely, the degradation rate of peak stress and elastic modulus increased with an increasing number of water-to-cement ratios.Finally, based on the above test results, an appropriate water-cement ratio can be selected according to the specific construction environment.



---

*Source: 2605751-2020-03-10.xml*