# Characterization on the Properties of Jute Fiber at Different Portions

Authors: Sweety Shahinur; Mahbub Hasan; Qumrul Ahsan; Dilip Kumar Saha; Md. Saiful Islam
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Natural fibers are environment-friendly, biodegradable, nonabrasive, and less costly and exhibit high initial modulus and high moisture absorption. However, they have nonuniformity in their mechanical, physical, chemical, and thermal properties at different portions. For this reason, long jute fiber was cut into three different portions and subsequently characterized using single fiber tensile test, differential scanning calorimetric, thermogravimetric analysis, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy according to top, middle, and cutting portions. The crystallinity and moisture content were measured by XRD data and moisture absorption test of the different portions of the raw jute fiber, respectively. The middle portion had better mechanical, thermal, chemical, and crystalline properties compared to the other two portions of the jute fiber. The diameter gradually became thinner from cutting to top portions. Thus the middle portion of jute fiber would be the better choice while being used as reinforcement in composites.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

A broad variety of natural fibers are nowadays available that can be used as filler in green composites due to their better physicochemical and physicomechanical properties. In recent times the natural fibers have found new field of application as reinforcement in composites for replacing the man-made synthetic fibers such as carbon [1]. Environmental regulations brought paradigm shift in the composite market. Thus, the interest of the natural fiber reinforced polymer composite in the composite market and in engineering application has increased significantly [1, 2].Natural fibers such as hemp, coir, bamboo, palm, and kenaf are easily available, inexpensive, light, renewable, biodegradable, and environmentally acceptable. Jute is a biodegradable, cheap, nontoxic, environment-friendly, and longest bast fiber. Due to the advent of cheap synthetic substitutes, bulk handling, containerization, and storage in soils, jute and jute goods are losing market sharply in the countries. Diversified use of jute is therefore essential in order to prevent further decline of the jute sectors [2]. However, the physicomechanical properties of the jute fiber vary in a wide range. For this reason, jute fibers are not used in the large range in the diversified production sectors. In order to diversify the use of jute fiber, various chemical treatments were conducted on jute fiber. In some places, jute was mixed with other materials [3–8]. Uddin et al. blended top, middle, and bottom portion of jute with jute cotton and found significant variation in properties. The top and cutting portions had comparable results when blended with jute cotton [3, 4]. Shahinur reported that the tensile properties of different portions of the jute fiber became similar after chemical treatment. However the properties were different in three different portions in raw jute fiber [5]. Wang et al. prepared micro and no fibrils from jute fiber using chemical treatment and reported better properties in the jute fibrils [6]. Teli and Valia conducted acetylation on jute to improve oil absorbency [7]. However, raw jute fiber was not characterized properly and the thermal properties were not evaluated according to different portions. The chief weakness of natural fibers is that they have different properties in different portions due to different maturity of the cell in different portions. The deviation of the properties also varies in wide range as natural fiber contains a wide range of nonhomogeneity [9, 10]. As a result, jute composites prepared using different portion of the jute fiber will not show uniform properties. In order to investigate the properties of different portions of jute fiber, long jute fiber was cut into three portions (top, middle, and cutting) in the present research. Those portions were subsequently characterized using physical, mechanical, and thermal techniques.


## 2. Methodology

Jute fiber was collected from Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Bangladesh. The origin of the fiber was Faridpur region situated at middle part of Bangladesh. The collected fibers were cut manually into three portions (top, middle, and cutting) of approximately 250 mm in length (Figure1). The single fiber was characterized by tensile testing using 6353 Instron machine (Instron, USA) at the crosshead speed 5 mm/sec [10]. The fiber span length was 5 mm, 15 mm, 25 mm, and 35 mm. The span length effect was corrected by newly developed method [10]. The moisture content was measured by conventional method at room temperature, moisture, and rainy conditions. The surface morphology of the fiber was observed under a scanning electron microscope. The moisture absorption characteristics of the different portions were studied at distilled water, 10% HCl, and 10% NaCl using ASTM-D 570. Fiber crystallinity was measured by X-ray diffraction data. A Norelco type 120-101-85 Philips electronic diffractometer with nickel filtered copper Kα was used. X-ray diffraction data were collected from the equatorial diffraction profiles using 5 to 15 steps scanning (2θ), method of “top of smoothed peak,” fiber diagram. Thermal properties were measured using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TA Instruments SDT Q50) on 8–10 mg raw jute fiber at a heating rate of 5°C/min in a nitrogen atmosphere. Differential scanning calorimetric analysis was also carried out to measure thermal properties using a DSC Q10 (TA Instruments) thermal system with a sealed aluminum capsule. 10 mg jute fiber was used and the temperature was varied in between 0 and 500°C.Figure 1
Cutting process of whole jute fiber.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Surface Morphology

The whole jute fiber was cut into three portions as top, middle, and cutting/bottom (Figure1). The surface morphology of the top, middle, and cutting portions was found different according to their thickness that was due to variation of the jute fiber maturity. The top fiber was immature, middle fiber was properly matured, and cutting portion was overmatured [11] (Figure 2). There were less pores and voids on the top portion fiber surface as compared to the surfaces of middle and cutting portions. Physically top portion was branched in soft and light colour. Middle portion was beautiful in colour and glassy, while cutting portion was rough and dark in colour as compared to the top and middle portion [12]. The top portion had less diameter (40 μm) due to immaturity, while the middle and cutting portion had sufficient diameter due to their cellulose content [13]. The diameter of the middle and cutting portions was approximately 65 μm and 75 μm, respectively.Figure 2
Surface morphology of (a) top, (b) middle, and (c) cutting portions of raw jute fiber.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.2. Tensile Properties

The tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and strain to failure of middle portion jute fiber were higher as compared to the top and cutting portions (Figure3). This was due to the higher cellulose content of the middle portion [13]. One important thing is that middle portion fibers were matured, whereas the top and cutting portions were immature and overmature, respectively [11]. The tensile strength and strain to failure for all portions decreased with span length. This is because the lower test span length was much affected by fiber properties and machine parameters. On the other hand, Young’s modulus increased with span length as found in previous research [10, 11].Figure 3
(a) Strain to failure, (b) tensile strength, and (c) Young’s modulus of different portions of raw jute fiber.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.3. Moisture Content Results

The moisture content of raw jute fiber of different portions is shown in Figure4. The middle portion of jute fiber showed exceptional results compared to the top and cutting portions due to its high cellulose and free hydroxyl (-OH) group content [13]. At room and moisture condition middle portion had lower moisture content than the other two portions; as a result mechanical and thermal properties of middle portion were higher compared to top and cutting portions [14].Figure 4
Moisture content of different portions of raw jute fiber.


### 3.4. Crystallinity Analysis

The XRD pattern, as well as crystallinity of the top middle and cutting portions, was similar (Figure5). The crystallinity of the top portion of jute fiber was slightly higher as compared to the middle and cutting portions, which could be due to the presence of less dense fats and waxes or lignin in the top portion [15]. As a result there were less pores and voids on the top portion fiber surface. From the XRD data, it can be clearly seen that the width at half-height of the 002 at 29–18° and 29–24° was similar to top, middle, and cutting portions of the fibers. There was only a small difference in the positions of these peaks [16].Figure 5
XRD pattern of the different portion of the raw jute fiber.


### 3.5. Thermal Properties

#### 3.5.1. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The thermal properties of different portion of jute are shown in Figure6 and tabulated in Table 1. The thermograph of individually three-portion jute fiber presented three stages (from 25 to 180°C, from 180 to 280°C, and from 280 to 500°C) of decomposition [17]. The middle portion of raw jute fiber had higher derivative change (Figure 6(a)) due to higher cellulose [13] content as compared to the top and cutting portion during increase in temperature. The thermal stability was similar to different portions but the weight change of the fiber rapidly changed in case of middle portion, followed by cutting and top portions, respectively. This was related to the moisture content of the different portions of jute fiber [5]. The first 10% weight loss (Figure 6(b)) occurred due to moisture evaporation and 20–30% weight loss occurred due to degradation of light materials such as hemicellulose and cellulose, while 70% weight loss occurred due to decomposition of heavy material like lignin of the jute fiber [17, 18]. The degradation temperature of cellulose was higher than the hemicellulose (25–290°C) and lignin (150–420°C). This was due to the fact that most of the cellulose structure was crystalline, which is strong and resistant to hydrolysis [19, 20]. After the removal of the free water, the degradation process began in the cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin constituents, and the associated linked water [17, 21].Table 1
Thermal properties of different portions of jute fiber.
Portion
Degradation temperature (°C) of
Moisture
Cellulose and hemicellulose
Lignin
Top
100
290
325
Middle
101
280
310
Cutting
100
285
320Figure 6
(a) DTGA and (b) TGA curves of different portions of raw jute fiber.
(a)
(b)DTGA curve showed a lower temperature peak at around 250°C for top portion fiber, which was due to the decomposition of hemicellulose. For the middle and cutting portion this peak was not visible, indicating the removal of hemicellulose from the fiber. Furthermore, a large peak at a temperature around 320°C was due to cellulose and lignin decomposition. At this stage, middle portion showed higher decomposition temperature compared to top and cutting portion of the jute fiber. This again proves that hemicellulose and lignin were less in the middle portion [17].


#### 3.5.2. DSC Analysis

DSC curves of three portions of jute fibers are shown in Figure7. Ball et al. reported that the endothermal reaction occurred due to volatilization (gases) of the molecules, whereas exothermal reaction occurred due to the formation of charring (solid residue) [18, 22]. The cutting portion shows a higher endothermic peak (around 100°C) for water evaporation compared to the top and middle portion (around 80°C). This result indicates that cutting portion has low hemicelluloses compared to middle and top. A small exothermic peak appeared at the temperature range of 250–290°C for cutting portion. This peak mainly occurred due to decomposition of hemicelluloses and a portion of lignin degradation. This exothermic peak disappeared from the top and middle portion of the jute fibers indicating greater amount of hemicellulose and lignin missing from the respected jute portions.Figure 7
DSC curves of three portions of raw jute fibers.


## 3.1. Surface Morphology

The whole jute fiber was cut into three portions as top, middle, and cutting/bottom (Figure1). The surface morphology of the top, middle, and cutting portions was found different according to their thickness that was due to variation of the jute fiber maturity. The top fiber was immature, middle fiber was properly matured, and cutting portion was overmatured [11] (Figure 2). There were less pores and voids on the top portion fiber surface as compared to the surfaces of middle and cutting portions. Physically top portion was branched in soft and light colour. Middle portion was beautiful in colour and glassy, while cutting portion was rough and dark in colour as compared to the top and middle portion [12]. The top portion had less diameter (40 μm) due to immaturity, while the middle and cutting portion had sufficient diameter due to their cellulose content [13]. The diameter of the middle and cutting portions was approximately 65 μm and 75 μm, respectively.Figure 2
Surface morphology of (a) top, (b) middle, and (c) cutting portions of raw jute fiber.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.2. Tensile Properties

The tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and strain to failure of middle portion jute fiber were higher as compared to the top and cutting portions (Figure3). This was due to the higher cellulose content of the middle portion [13]. One important thing is that middle portion fibers were matured, whereas the top and cutting portions were immature and overmature, respectively [11]. The tensile strength and strain to failure for all portions decreased with span length. This is because the lower test span length was much affected by fiber properties and machine parameters. On the other hand, Young’s modulus increased with span length as found in previous research [10, 11].Figure 3
(a) Strain to failure, (b) tensile strength, and (c) Young’s modulus of different portions of raw jute fiber.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.3. Moisture Content Results

The moisture content of raw jute fiber of different portions is shown in Figure4. The middle portion of jute fiber showed exceptional results compared to the top and cutting portions due to its high cellulose and free hydroxyl (-OH) group content [13]. At room and moisture condition middle portion had lower moisture content than the other two portions; as a result mechanical and thermal properties of middle portion were higher compared to top and cutting portions [14].Figure 4
Moisture content of different portions of raw jute fiber.


## 3.4. Crystallinity Analysis

The XRD pattern, as well as crystallinity of the top middle and cutting portions, was similar (Figure5). The crystallinity of the top portion of jute fiber was slightly higher as compared to the middle and cutting portions, which could be due to the presence of less dense fats and waxes or lignin in the top portion [15]. As a result there were less pores and voids on the top portion fiber surface. From the XRD data, it can be clearly seen that the width at half-height of the 002 at 29–18° and 29–24° was similar to top, middle, and cutting portions of the fibers. There was only a small difference in the positions of these peaks [16].Figure 5
XRD pattern of the different portion of the raw jute fiber.


## 3.5. Thermal Properties

### 3.5.1. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The thermal properties of different portion of jute are shown in Figure6 and tabulated in Table 1. The thermograph of individually three-portion jute fiber presented three stages (from 25 to 180°C, from 180 to 280°C, and from 280 to 500°C) of decomposition [17]. The middle portion of raw jute fiber had higher derivative change (Figure 6(a)) due to higher cellulose [13] content as compared to the top and cutting portion during increase in temperature. The thermal stability was similar to different portions but the weight change of the fiber rapidly changed in case of middle portion, followed by cutting and top portions, respectively. This was related to the moisture content of the different portions of jute fiber [5]. The first 10% weight loss (Figure 6(b)) occurred due to moisture evaporation and 20–30% weight loss occurred due to degradation of light materials such as hemicellulose and cellulose, while 70% weight loss occurred due to decomposition of heavy material like lignin of the jute fiber [17, 18]. The degradation temperature of cellulose was higher than the hemicellulose (25–290°C) and lignin (150–420°C). This was due to the fact that most of the cellulose structure was crystalline, which is strong and resistant to hydrolysis [19, 20]. After the removal of the free water, the degradation process began in the cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin constituents, and the associated linked water [17, 21].Table 1
Thermal properties of different portions of jute fiber.
Portion
Degradation temperature (°C) of
Moisture
Cellulose and hemicellulose
Lignin
Top
100
290
325
Middle
101
280
310
Cutting
100
285
320Figure 6
(a) DTGA and (b) TGA curves of different portions of raw jute fiber.
(a)
(b)DTGA curve showed a lower temperature peak at around 250°C for top portion fiber, which was due to the decomposition of hemicellulose. For the middle and cutting portion this peak was not visible, indicating the removal of hemicellulose from the fiber. Furthermore, a large peak at a temperature around 320°C was due to cellulose and lignin decomposition. At this stage, middle portion showed higher decomposition temperature compared to top and cutting portion of the jute fiber. This again proves that hemicellulose and lignin were less in the middle portion [17].


### 3.5.2. DSC Analysis

DSC curves of three portions of jute fibers are shown in Figure7. Ball et al. reported that the endothermal reaction occurred due to volatilization (gases) of the molecules, whereas exothermal reaction occurred due to the formation of charring (solid residue) [18, 22]. The cutting portion shows a higher endothermic peak (around 100°C) for water evaporation compared to the top and middle portion (around 80°C). This result indicates that cutting portion has low hemicelluloses compared to middle and top. A small exothermic peak appeared at the temperature range of 250–290°C for cutting portion. This peak mainly occurred due to decomposition of hemicelluloses and a portion of lignin degradation. This exothermic peak disappeared from the top and middle portion of the jute fibers indicating greater amount of hemicellulose and lignin missing from the respected jute portions.Figure 7
DSC curves of three portions of raw jute fibers.


## 3.5.1. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The thermal properties of different portion of jute are shown in Figure6 and tabulated in Table 1. The thermograph of individually three-portion jute fiber presented three stages (from 25 to 180°C, from 180 to 280°C, and from 280 to 500°C) of decomposition [17]. The middle portion of raw jute fiber had higher derivative change (Figure 6(a)) due to higher cellulose [13] content as compared to the top and cutting portion during increase in temperature. The thermal stability was similar to different portions but the weight change of the fiber rapidly changed in case of middle portion, followed by cutting and top portions, respectively. This was related to the moisture content of the different portions of jute fiber [5]. The first 10% weight loss (Figure 6(b)) occurred due to moisture evaporation and 20–30% weight loss occurred due to degradation of light materials such as hemicellulose and cellulose, while 70% weight loss occurred due to decomposition of heavy material like lignin of the jute fiber [17, 18]. The degradation temperature of cellulose was higher than the hemicellulose (25–290°C) and lignin (150–420°C). This was due to the fact that most of the cellulose structure was crystalline, which is strong and resistant to hydrolysis [19, 20]. After the removal of the free water, the degradation process began in the cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin constituents, and the associated linked water [17, 21].Table 1
Thermal properties of different portions of jute fiber.
Portion
Degradation temperature (°C) of
Moisture
Cellulose and hemicellulose
Lignin
Top
100
290
325
Middle
101
280
310
Cutting
100
285
320Figure 6
(a) DTGA and (b) TGA curves of different portions of raw jute fiber.
(a)
(b)DTGA curve showed a lower temperature peak at around 250°C for top portion fiber, which was due to the decomposition of hemicellulose. For the middle and cutting portion this peak was not visible, indicating the removal of hemicellulose from the fiber. Furthermore, a large peak at a temperature around 320°C was due to cellulose and lignin decomposition. At this stage, middle portion showed higher decomposition temperature compared to top and cutting portion of the jute fiber. This again proves that hemicellulose and lignin were less in the middle portion [17].


## 3.5.2. DSC Analysis

DSC curves of three portions of jute fibers are shown in Figure7. Ball et al. reported that the endothermal reaction occurred due to volatilization (gases) of the molecules, whereas exothermal reaction occurred due to the formation of charring (solid residue) [18, 22]. The cutting portion shows a higher endothermic peak (around 100°C) for water evaporation compared to the top and middle portion (around 80°C). This result indicates that cutting portion has low hemicelluloses compared to middle and top. A small exothermic peak appeared at the temperature range of 250–290°C for cutting portion. This peak mainly occurred due to decomposition of hemicelluloses and a portion of lignin degradation. This exothermic peak disappeared from the top and middle portion of the jute fibers indicating greater amount of hemicellulose and lignin missing from the respected jute portions.Figure 7
DSC curves of three portions of raw jute fibers.


## 4. Conclusions

The present study investigated the physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of different portion jute fiber. Single fiber tensile test, differential scanning calorimetric analysis, thermogravimetric analysis, X-ray diffraction analysis, and scanning electron microscopy on top, bottom, and cutting portions of jute fiber were carried out. The middle portion had higher tensile strength, strain to failure, and Young’s modulus as compared to top and cutting portions. The surface of the cutting portion was rougher as compared to the top and middle portions. On the other hand, the crystallinity of different portions of jute fiber was similar. However, there was a small difference in the position of the peaks. The middle portion of jute fiber also had higher thermal stability as compared to the other two portions. Thus the middle portion should be used as reinforcement in composites.



---

*Source: 262348-2015-10-26.xml*