# Frost Durability and Strength of Concrete Prepared with Crushed Sand of Different Characteristics

Authors: Ming-kai Zhou; Zhan-ao Liu; Xiao Chen
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The influences of fines content, methylene blue (MB) value, and lithology of crushed sand (CS) on frost durability and strength of concrete were investigated, and the frost durability and strength of crushed sand concrete (CSC) and river sand concrete (RSC) were compared. The results show that inclusion of fines improves CSC compressive strength and reduces frost durability of C30 CSC when fines content reaches 10%, whereas it has little negative influence on frost durability of C60 CSC. Increasing MB value does not negatively affect compressive strength of C30 CSC but decreases compressive strength of C60 CSC and frost durability of CSC, and the reduction is more pronounced when MB value exceeds 1.0. Lithology has no prominent influence on frost durability and compressive strength of CSC within the lithologies (dolomite, limestone, granite, basalt, and quartz) studied. Though compressive strength of CSC is a little higher than RSC under equal water to cement ratio, frost durability of CSC is no better than RSC especially for C30 CSC, and air-entraining agent is suggested for enhancing frost durability of C30 CSC exposed to freezing environment.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Fine aggregate is a necessary raw material for making concrete, and its characteristics can impact concrete properties from workability to strength and durability. In developing countries where infrastructure constructions are massively needed like China, growing depletion and expansive cost of river sand (RS) have resulted in extensive application of CS. CS refers to fine particles finer than 4.75 mm produced by rock crushing. Generally speaking, CS particles are more angular and much tougher when compared with RS particles and particularly contain 10–20% of fines which are finer than 75μm. These fines are likely to be contaminated by clay in the field and the presence of clay can be detected by MB value [1, 2].A number of researches have been done on properties of CSC so far. It has been established that qualified concrete with satisfactory strength and durability can successfully be prepared using CS [3–5]. At a given water to cement (W/C) ratio, concrete made with CS often presents higher water demand and poorer workability than corresponding concrete made with RS, yet this negative effect can be offset by using high range water reducer or mineral admixture. Additionally, coarse texture strengthens the bonding between sand particle and cement paste, and the fines fill in the voids in cement paste to generate a denser matrix, which makes CSC have relatively higher strength and permeability resistance than RSC [6–8].Properties of CS are greatly affected by parent rock and crushing technology [9, 10]. Therefore, various CS may differ in parent rock lithology, fines content, and the amount of clay in sand, and it is recognized that these characteristics can affect both fresh and hardened properties of concrete. However, relevant researches are concentrated on mechanical or permeability properties of crushed limestone sand concrete [3, 11, 12], and effects of such CS characteristics on property of CSC, especially frost durability, have been little investigated yet.Therefore, this research reports an investigation on the effects of CS characteristics on frost durability of low- and high-strength CSC. In the study, frost durability of CSC was examined using the rapid freezing-thawing (FT) method and the test results were compared with those of RSC. The compressive strength of CSC was also investigated. Experimental results of this research can verify crucial factors affecting frost durability of CSC and provide technical guidance for application of CSC in cold regions.


## 2. Experimental Program

### 2.1. Materials

The cement used was 42.5-grade ordinary Portland cement and its physical properties were displayed in Table1. The fine aggregates were washed and consisted of a RS and five CSs of different lithologies, including dolomite (DL), limestone (LS), granite (GR), basalt (BA), and quartz (QZ). The properties of fine aggregate were shown in Table 2. The coarse aggregate (CA) was continuous grading crushed stone with a maximum grain size of 26.5 mm, and its apparent density and crushing value were 2731 kg/m3 and 10.7%, respectively. The fines (density 2.89 g/cm3, blain surface area 335.4 m2/kg) were prepared by grinding washed CS in a ball mill. The clay (density 2.05 g/cm3, blain surface area 417.8 m2/kg) was obtained from a mining company. The water reducer (WR) was a high range polycarboxylate superplasticizer (solid content 39%, density 1.07 g/cm3), which is in conformity with Chinese industry standard JG/T 223-2007 [13].Table 1
Physical properties of used cement.
Density (g/cm3)
Standard consistency (%)
Setting time (min)
Flexural strength (MPa)
Compressive strength (MPa)
Initial
Final
3 d
28 d
3 d
28 d
3.13
27.0
125
190
6.8
9.3
30.3
51.2Table 2
Properties of used fine aggregates.
Lithology
Apparent density (kg/m3)
Crushing value (%)
Void ratio (%)
Fineness modulus∗
Water absorption (%)
Main mineral composition
RS
2630
12.4
36.0
2.81
0.53
Quartz
DL
2837
23.2
44.5
3.15
0.78
Dolomite
LS
2667
24.2
40.6
3.17
0.80
Limestone
GR
2650
18.7
42.7
3.17
0.87
Quartz, sanidine, mica
BA
2895
19.7
45.3
3.24
0.96
Augite, anorthite
QZ
2657
21.3
42.3
3.08
1.07
Quartz, albite
∗Grading of used CS was adjusted by means of sieving to obtain fineness of around 3.1.


### 2.2. Test Methods

Crushing value of aggregates was determined according to JTG E42-2005 [14]. Compressive strength of concrete was tested on 150 mm cubes in accordance with JTG E30-2005 [15]. Water absorption of concrete was measured on 100 mm cubes in compliance with ASTM C642-13 [16]. Frost durability of concrete was tested on 100 × 100 × 400 mm prisms following “the rapid FT method” according to GB/T 50082-2008 [17]. The prisms specimen was kept for 28 days of wet curing and then cycled within a temperature of −18°C to 5°C in a FT apparatus at an average rate of 8 cycles per day. The fundamental transverse frequency was recorded every 25 and 50 cycles for specimens of C30 and C60 concrete, respectively. The durability factor (DF) is determined according to the following expression:(1)
DF
=
E
r
×
N
300
,where E
r is the relative dynamic modulus of elasticity at N cycles (%) and N is the number of cycles at which E
r reaches 60% for stopping the test or the specified cycle number of 300 at which the test is to be terminated.The relative dynamic modulus of elasticityE
r is determined according to the expression below:(2)
E
r
,
n
=
f
n
f
0
2
×
100
,where E
r
,
n is the relative dynamic modulus of elasticity after n cycles of freezing and thawing (%); f
n is the fundamental frequency after n cycles of FT (Hz); and f
0 is the fundamental frequency before FT cycle (Hz).


## 2.1. Materials

The cement used was 42.5-grade ordinary Portland cement and its physical properties were displayed in Table1. The fine aggregates were washed and consisted of a RS and five CSs of different lithologies, including dolomite (DL), limestone (LS), granite (GR), basalt (BA), and quartz (QZ). The properties of fine aggregate were shown in Table 2. The coarse aggregate (CA) was continuous grading crushed stone with a maximum grain size of 26.5 mm, and its apparent density and crushing value were 2731 kg/m3 and 10.7%, respectively. The fines (density 2.89 g/cm3, blain surface area 335.4 m2/kg) were prepared by grinding washed CS in a ball mill. The clay (density 2.05 g/cm3, blain surface area 417.8 m2/kg) was obtained from a mining company. The water reducer (WR) was a high range polycarboxylate superplasticizer (solid content 39%, density 1.07 g/cm3), which is in conformity with Chinese industry standard JG/T 223-2007 [13].Table 1
Physical properties of used cement.
Density (g/cm3)
Standard consistency (%)
Setting time (min)
Flexural strength (MPa)
Compressive strength (MPa)
Initial
Final
3 d
28 d
3 d
28 d
3.13
27.0
125
190
6.8
9.3
30.3
51.2Table 2
Properties of used fine aggregates.
Lithology
Apparent density (kg/m3)
Crushing value (%)
Void ratio (%)
Fineness modulus∗
Water absorption (%)
Main mineral composition
RS
2630
12.4
36.0
2.81
0.53
Quartz
DL
2837
23.2
44.5
3.15
0.78
Dolomite
LS
2667
24.2
40.6
3.17
0.80
Limestone
GR
2650
18.7
42.7
3.17
0.87
Quartz, sanidine, mica
BA
2895
19.7
45.3
3.24
0.96
Augite, anorthite
QZ
2657
21.3
42.3
3.08
1.07
Quartz, albite
∗Grading of used CS was adjusted by means of sieving to obtain fineness of around 3.1.


## 2.2. Test Methods

Crushing value of aggregates was determined according to JTG E42-2005 [14]. Compressive strength of concrete was tested on 150 mm cubes in accordance with JTG E30-2005 [15]. Water absorption of concrete was measured on 100 mm cubes in compliance with ASTM C642-13 [16]. Frost durability of concrete was tested on 100 × 100 × 400 mm prisms following “the rapid FT method” according to GB/T 50082-2008 [17]. The prisms specimen was kept for 28 days of wet curing and then cycled within a temperature of −18°C to 5°C in a FT apparatus at an average rate of 8 cycles per day. The fundamental transverse frequency was recorded every 25 and 50 cycles for specimens of C30 and C60 concrete, respectively. The durability factor (DF) is determined according to the following expression:(1)
DF
=
E
r
×
N
300
,where E
r is the relative dynamic modulus of elasticity at N cycles (%) and N is the number of cycles at which E
r reaches 60% for stopping the test or the specified cycle number of 300 at which the test is to be terminated.The relative dynamic modulus of elasticityE
r is determined according to the expression below:(2)
E
r
,
n
=
f
n
f
0
2
×
100
,where E
r
,
n is the relative dynamic modulus of elasticity after n cycles of freezing and thawing (%); f
n is the fundamental frequency after n cycles of FT (Hz); and f
0 is the fundamental frequency before FT cycle (Hz).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Influence of Fines Content of CS on Strength and Frost Durability

Fines were incorporated in concrete as replacement of sand at variable contents, and the mix proportions of the influence of fines content on concrete frost durability and strengths are shown in Table3.Table 3
Concrete mix proportions and strengths of resultant concrete.
Strength grade
Fines content
⁢Unit weight (kg/m3)
Compressive strength (MPa)
Cement
Water
CA
CS (DL)
Fines
WR
3 d
28 d
C30
Control
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
21.3
38.1
5%
327
180
1079
773.3
40.7
0.65
23.8
39.0
10%
327
180
1079
732.6
81.4
0.65
25.6
41.3
15%
327
180
1079
691.9
122.1
0.65
27.4
43.3
20%
327
180
1079
651.2
162.8
0.65
27.7
44.9
C60
Control
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
52.1
71.1
3%
531
170
1061
715.9
22.1
2.06
52.7
76.1
7%
531
170
1061
686.3
51.7
2.06
57.8
78.9
10%
531
170
1061
664.2
73.8
2.06
58.8
77.7
15%
531
170
1061
627.3
110.7
2.06
59.4
72.9The data in Table3 show that compressive strengths of C30 CSC gradually increase with increasing fines content from 5 to 20%, and the maximum 3 d and 28 d strengths are obtained at fines content of 20%, which are about 30% and 18% higher than the control, respectively. However, although 3 d compressive strength of C60 CSC increases with fines content from 3 to 15%, 28 d compressive strength begins to decrease after achieving a maximum strength at 7%. The maximum 3 d and 28 d compressive strengths of C60 CSC are about 14% and 11% higher than the control, which are lower than the strength improvement of C30 CSC. The increase of strength can be attributed to filler effect and acceleration effect on cement hydration of fines [18, 19].The influences of fines content on frost durability of C30 and C60 CSC are shown in Figures1 and 2. In Figure 1, E
r and DF of C30 CSC under variable FT cycles decrease with increasing fines content and the trend is prominent when fines content reaches 10%. C30 CSC containing 20% fines has the lowest DF which is 68% lower than the control, indicating increase of fines content significantly decreases frost durability of C30 CSC. This result is consistent with the finding of Tsivilis et al. [20], who reported that increasing incorporation of limestone fines reduced frost durability of concrete with a high W/C. It should be noted that frost durability grades of all C30 CSC are within F50–F150, which implies frost durability of C30 CSC is rather poor. Therefore, air-entraining agent is expected to improve frost durability of low-strength CSC exposed to freezing environment.Figure 1
Effect of fines content on frost durability of C30 CSC: (a)E
r. (b) DF.
(a)
(b)Figure 2
Effect of fines content on frost durability of C60 CSC: (a)E
r. (b) DF.
(a)
(b)In Figure2, E
r and DF of C60 CSC under variable FT cycles nearly remain unchanged with increase of fines content, and they present a slight decrease when fines content rises to 10%. For example, the lowest DF of C60 CSC containing 15% fines is only 3% lower than the control. Besides, E
r of all C60 CSC after 300 FT cycles vary from 92.3% to 95.7%, which can be classified as a high frost durability grade of over F300. This demonstrates that fines have little negative influence on frost durability of C60 CSC.Fines belong to a kind of nonpozzolanic filler. The increase of fines content decreases the relative amount of cement in powdery materials of concrete, so that there is not enough cement paste to coat and bind the all aggregates [3]; thus the frost durability is compromised. For instance, when fines content increases from 0% to 10%, volume percentage of cement in powdery materials in C30 concrete considerably drops from 100% to 79%, whereas that in C60 concrete decreases from 100% to 90%.Frost durability of C30 CSC is inherently poor owning to high W/C. Additionally, cement content of C30 CSC is relatively low. Thus inclusion of fines significantly decreases the relative amount of cement and thereby reduces frost durability. However, C60 CSC has high frost durability due to low W/C and high cement content, which cause frost durability of C60 CSC to be much less sensitive to variation in fines content as compared to that of C30 CSC.


### 3.2. Influence of MB Value of CS on Strength and Frost Durability

MB value of CS was adjusted by incorporating clay as partial replacements of fines at fixed fines content of 10%. Concrete mix proportions and compressive strengths are shown in Table4, and frost durability of C30 and C60 CSC is depicted in Figures 5 and 6, respectively.Table 4
Concrete mix proportions and strengths of resultant concrete.
Strength grade
MB value(g/kg)
Unit weight (kg/m3)
Compressive strength (MPa)
WA (%)
Cement
Water
CA
CS (DL)
Fines
Clay
WR
3 d
28 d
C30
Control
327
180
1079
814
0
0
0.59
21.3
38.1
0.96
0.3
327
180
1079
773.3
81.4
0
0.65
25.6
41.3
0.94
0.5
327
180
1079
773.3
79.9
1.5
0.65
25.9
43.7
0.93
1.0
327
180
1079
773.3
76.3
5.1
0.65
26.3
44.6
0.97
1.4
327
180
1079
773.3
73.6
7.8
0.65
26.2
44.3
1.01
2.0
327
180
1079
773.3
69.9
11.5
0.65
26.0
43.9
1.05
C60
Control
531
170
1061
738
0
0
1.86
52.1
71.1
0.63
0.3
531
170
1061
664.2
73.8
0
2.06
58.8
77.7
0.60
0.5
531
170
1061
664.2
72.4
1.4
2.06
58.0
72.4
0.61
1.0
531
170
1061
664.2
69.2
4.7
2.06
53.1
71.7
0.67
1.4
531
170
1061
664.2
66.7
7.1
2.06
52.0
65.9
0.80
2.0
531
170
1061
664.2
63.4
10.4
2.06
48.5
64.0
0.97As can be seen in Table4, the maximum compressive strengths of C30 CSC at 3 days and 28 days are achieved at MB value of 1.0, which are 24% and 17% higher than the control, and beyond 1.0 the compressive strengths begin to decrease. It is also noticeable that compressive strengths of all C30 concrete samples are higher than the control, which illustrates increase of MB value does not negatively affect strength of C30 CSC. Similar results were obtained previously by Courard et al. [2], who reported no strength reduction was found when certain amount of clay was incorporated in a mortar with W/C of 0.67.However, in the case of C60 CSC, compressive strengths decrease with increase of MB value from 0.3 to 2.0, and they become lower than the control when MB value exceeds 1.0, which varies from the influence of MB value on compressive strength of C30 CSC. The minimum compressive strengths of 3 d and 28 d are observed at MB value of 2.0, which are about 7% and 10% lower than the control.C30 concrete is vulnerable to segregation and bleeding for its high W/C and low cement content. Inclusion of fines containing clay enhances cohesiveness of fresh concrete and fills in the voids in hardened concrete, which may create a denser matrix and thus improve strength (Figure3). Nevertheless, for C60 concrete with low W/C, clay may not only prevent cement hydration due to absorbing free water, but also generate voids in hardened cement paste or microcracks in interface transition zone (ITZ) [21, 22] after shrinking (Figure 4). In turn, the strength is impaired.Figure 3
SEM images of ITZ in C30 CSC: (a) the control; (b) MB value 1.0; (c) MB value 2.0.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 4
SEM images of ITZ in C60 CSC: (a) the control; (b) MB value 1.0; (c) MB value 2.0.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 5
Effect of MB value on frost durability of C30 CSC: (a)E
r. (b) DF.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
Effect of MB value on frost durability of C60 CSC: (a)E
r. (b) DF.
(a)
(b)Influences of MB value onE
r and DF of C30 and C60 CSC are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. It is apparent that E
r and DF of both C30 and C60 CSC under variable FT cycles decrease with increasing MB value, and the decrease is more pronounced when MB value exceeds 1.0. When MB value increases from 0.3 to 2.0, frost durability grade of C30 CSC decreases from F125 to F25 (DF drops from 30.4% to 8.0% relevantly), while that of C60 CSC decreases from over F300 to F200 (DF drops from 95.7% to 47.2% relevantly). This indicates increase of MB value significantly deteriorates frost durability of C30 and C60 CSC.MB value of CS reflects the relative amount of clay in fines, and an increase of MB value indicates increasing amount of clay in concrete [1, 2]. Consequently, it is supposed that clay accounts for reduction of frost durability. Firstly, clay particles expand after absorbing water in fresh concrete and later shrink to leave voids in hardened concrete, which generates higher porosity and thus decreases strength and impermeability and, secondly, dehydrated clay particles will absorb water again in water-saturated environment, both of which result in a higher water absorption (WA, as seen in Table 4) and increase saturation degree of concrete. Saturation degree is found to be the key factor affecting frost durability [23]. Hence the frost damage is exaggerated during FT cycles, and the higher the MB value of CS is, the greater the frost durability is reduced.


### 3.3. Influence of Lithology of CS on Strength and Frost Durability

One RS and five CSs of different lithologies were selected to prepare concrete according to mix proportions in Table5. The influences of CS lithology on compressive strength and frost durability of CSC were studied, and the frost durability between CSC and RSC with equal W/C was compared.Table 5
Concrete mix proportions and strengths of resultant concrete.
Strength grade
Lithology
Unit weight (kg/m3)
Compressive strength (MPa)
Cement
Water
CA
Sand
Fines
WR
3 d
28 d
C30
RS
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
20.1
37.4
DL
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
21.3
38.1
LS
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
21.9
39.2
GR
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
21.6
40.3
BA
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
22.6
40.1
QZ
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
20.3
38.9
C60
RS
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
50.5
69.9
DL
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
52.1
71.1
LS
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
53.5
72.9
GR
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
55.7
75.8
BA
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
54.9
74.8
QZ
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
53.9
72.8As shown in Table5, 28 d compressive strengths of C30 and C60 concrete made with various CSs are within range of 38.1–40.3 MPa and 71.1–75.8 MPa. It can be calculated that the variation coefficient of strength is around 2%, which indicates CS lithology seems to have little impact on compressive strength of C30 and C60 CSC. However, concrete made with granite CS presents relatively higher strength than the other groups. This is probably due to the fact that granite CS particles have higher mechanical strength (lower crushing value) than the others, which increases the mechanical interlocking with cement paste [24]. In addition, the average 28 d compressive strength of CSC is about 5% higher than that of RSC. This can be attributed to the fact that CS particles have tougher surface texture and more angular shape, which enables them to have stronger bonding with cement paste than RS particles do [6, 11].The influences of lithology onE
r and DF of C30 and C60 concrete are shown in Figures 7 and 8. In Figure 7, E
r of C30 concrete prepared with CS of different lithologies are not below 60% until FT cycle number reaches 125, while E
r of all C60 concrete samples are above 90% after 300 FT cycles. This illustrates that frost durability grade of all C30 CSC is F125 while that of all C60 CSC is over F300. Moreover, the DF differences among C30 CSC and C60 CSC are less than 2% which is nearly negligible. Therefore, it can be stated that CS lithology has no prominent influence on strength and frost durability within the lithologies studied.Figure 7
Effect of lithology on frost durability of C30 concrete: (a)E
r. (b) DF.
(a)
(b)Figure 8
Effect of lithology on frost durability of C60 concrete: (a)E
r. (b) DF.
(a)
(b)Figures7 and 8 show that frost durability grades of C30 CSC and RSC are, respectively, F125 and F200, and DF of C30 CSC is 42% lower than that of C30 RSC. However, no remarkable difference is noticed between frost durability grade and DF of C60 CSC and RSC. This manifests that frost durability of C60 CSC is nearly equal to that of C60 RSC, whereas frost durability of C30 CSC is much poorer than that of C30 RSC. This could be due to the fact that microcracks are likely generated on surface of CS particles after crushing [9, 10], which results in water absorption and crushing value of CS particles being much higher than those of RS particles. According to the data in Table 2, water absorption and crushing value of the used RS are 0.53% and 12.4%, and the average water absorption and crushing value of studied CS are 0.95% and 21.4%, which are nearly twice as high as those of RS particles.For C30 concrete with low strength and impermeability, CS particles with high crushing value (low mechanical strength) and water absorption (high permeability), together with the interface between sand particle and cement paste, might be damaged by freezing of water penetrated into concrete, which leads to frost durability of C30 CSC being reduced and poorer than that of C30 RSC. However, as for C60 concrete having high strength and impermeability, the sand particles are so well bonded by cement paste that neither the sand particle nor interface could be frozen to damage. Thus, frost durability of C60 CSC is rarely affected and nearly equal to that of C60 RSC.Crushing values and water absorptions of the used CS are almost around 20% and 0.9%, respectively, which may account for inconspicuous frost durability difference of concrete prepared with CS of various lithologies. Parent rock lithology can affect water absorption and crushing value of CS, and some researcher believed they were related to frost durability of concrete [25, 26]. Therefore, in the next stage of study, more representative CS samples should be selected to investigate the effect of water absorption and crushing value of CS on frost durability.


## 3.1. Influence of Fines Content of CS on Strength and Frost Durability

Fines were incorporated in concrete as replacement of sand at variable contents, and the mix proportions of the influence of fines content on concrete frost durability and strengths are shown in Table3.Table 3
Concrete mix proportions and strengths of resultant concrete.
Strength grade
Fines content
⁢Unit weight (kg/m3)
Compressive strength (MPa)
Cement
Water
CA
CS (DL)
Fines
WR
3 d
28 d
C30
Control
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
21.3
38.1
5%
327
180
1079
773.3
40.7
0.65
23.8
39.0
10%
327
180
1079
732.6
81.4
0.65
25.6
41.3
15%
327
180
1079
691.9
122.1
0.65
27.4
43.3
20%
327
180
1079
651.2
162.8
0.65
27.7
44.9
C60
Control
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
52.1
71.1
3%
531
170
1061
715.9
22.1
2.06
52.7
76.1
7%
531
170
1061
686.3
51.7
2.06
57.8
78.9
10%
531
170
1061
664.2
73.8
2.06
58.8
77.7
15%
531
170
1061
627.3
110.7
2.06
59.4
72.9The data in Table3 show that compressive strengths of C30 CSC gradually increase with increasing fines content from 5 to 20%, and the maximum 3 d and 28 d strengths are obtained at fines content of 20%, which are about 30% and 18% higher than the control, respectively. However, although 3 d compressive strength of C60 CSC increases with fines content from 3 to 15%, 28 d compressive strength begins to decrease after achieving a maximum strength at 7%. The maximum 3 d and 28 d compressive strengths of C60 CSC are about 14% and 11% higher than the control, which are lower than the strength improvement of C30 CSC. The increase of strength can be attributed to filler effect and acceleration effect on cement hydration of fines [18, 19].The influences of fines content on frost durability of C30 and C60 CSC are shown in Figures1 and 2. In Figure 1, E
r and DF of C30 CSC under variable FT cycles decrease with increasing fines content and the trend is prominent when fines content reaches 10%. C30 CSC containing 20% fines has the lowest DF which is 68% lower than the control, indicating increase of fines content significantly decreases frost durability of C30 CSC. This result is consistent with the finding of Tsivilis et al. [20], who reported that increasing incorporation of limestone fines reduced frost durability of concrete with a high W/C. It should be noted that frost durability grades of all C30 CSC are within F50–F150, which implies frost durability of C30 CSC is rather poor. Therefore, air-entraining agent is expected to improve frost durability of low-strength CSC exposed to freezing environment.Figure 1
Effect of fines content on frost durability of C30 CSC: (a)E
r. (b) DF.
(a)
(b)Figure 2
Effect of fines content on frost durability of C60 CSC: (a)E
r. (b) DF.
(a)
(b)In Figure2, E
r and DF of C60 CSC under variable FT cycles nearly remain unchanged with increase of fines content, and they present a slight decrease when fines content rises to 10%. For example, the lowest DF of C60 CSC containing 15% fines is only 3% lower than the control. Besides, E
r of all C60 CSC after 300 FT cycles vary from 92.3% to 95.7%, which can be classified as a high frost durability grade of over F300. This demonstrates that fines have little negative influence on frost durability of C60 CSC.Fines belong to a kind of nonpozzolanic filler. The increase of fines content decreases the relative amount of cement in powdery materials of concrete, so that there is not enough cement paste to coat and bind the all aggregates [3]; thus the frost durability is compromised. For instance, when fines content increases from 0% to 10%, volume percentage of cement in powdery materials in C30 concrete considerably drops from 100% to 79%, whereas that in C60 concrete decreases from 100% to 90%.Frost durability of C30 CSC is inherently poor owning to high W/C. Additionally, cement content of C30 CSC is relatively low. Thus inclusion of fines significantly decreases the relative amount of cement and thereby reduces frost durability. However, C60 CSC has high frost durability due to low W/C and high cement content, which cause frost durability of C60 CSC to be much less sensitive to variation in fines content as compared to that of C30 CSC.


## 3.2. Influence of MB Value of CS on Strength and Frost Durability

MB value of CS was adjusted by incorporating clay as partial replacements of fines at fixed fines content of 10%. Concrete mix proportions and compressive strengths are shown in Table4, and frost durability of C30 and C60 CSC is depicted in Figures 5 and 6, respectively.Table 4
Concrete mix proportions and strengths of resultant concrete.
Strength grade
MB value(g/kg)
Unit weight (kg/m3)
Compressive strength (MPa)
WA (%)
Cement
Water
CA
CS (DL)
Fines
Clay
WR
3 d
28 d
C30
Control
327
180
1079
814
0
0
0.59
21.3
38.1
0.96
0.3
327
180
1079
773.3
81.4
0
0.65
25.6
41.3
0.94
0.5
327
180
1079
773.3
79.9
1.5
0.65
25.9
43.7
0.93
1.0
327
180
1079
773.3
76.3
5.1
0.65
26.3
44.6
0.97
1.4
327
180
1079
773.3
73.6
7.8
0.65
26.2
44.3
1.01
2.0
327
180
1079
773.3
69.9
11.5
0.65
26.0
43.9
1.05
C60
Control
531
170
1061
738
0
0
1.86
52.1
71.1
0.63
0.3
531
170
1061
664.2
73.8
0
2.06
58.8
77.7
0.60
0.5
531
170
1061
664.2
72.4
1.4
2.06
58.0
72.4
0.61
1.0
531
170
1061
664.2
69.2
4.7
2.06
53.1
71.7
0.67
1.4
531
170
1061
664.2
66.7
7.1
2.06
52.0
65.9
0.80
2.0
531
170
1061
664.2
63.4
10.4
2.06
48.5
64.0
0.97As can be seen in Table4, the maximum compressive strengths of C30 CSC at 3 days and 28 days are achieved at MB value of 1.0, which are 24% and 17% higher than the control, and beyond 1.0 the compressive strengths begin to decrease. It is also noticeable that compressive strengths of all C30 concrete samples are higher than the control, which illustrates increase of MB value does not negatively affect strength of C30 CSC. Similar results were obtained previously by Courard et al. [2], who reported no strength reduction was found when certain amount of clay was incorporated in a mortar with W/C of 0.67.However, in the case of C60 CSC, compressive strengths decrease with increase of MB value from 0.3 to 2.0, and they become lower than the control when MB value exceeds 1.0, which varies from the influence of MB value on compressive strength of C30 CSC. The minimum compressive strengths of 3 d and 28 d are observed at MB value of 2.0, which are about 7% and 10% lower than the control.C30 concrete is vulnerable to segregation and bleeding for its high W/C and low cement content. Inclusion of fines containing clay enhances cohesiveness of fresh concrete and fills in the voids in hardened concrete, which may create a denser matrix and thus improve strength (Figure3). Nevertheless, for C60 concrete with low W/C, clay may not only prevent cement hydration due to absorbing free water, but also generate voids in hardened cement paste or microcracks in interface transition zone (ITZ) [21, 22] after shrinking (Figure 4). In turn, the strength is impaired.Figure 3
SEM images of ITZ in C30 CSC: (a) the control; (b) MB value 1.0; (c) MB value 2.0.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 4
SEM images of ITZ in C60 CSC: (a) the control; (b) MB value 1.0; (c) MB value 2.0.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 5
Effect of MB value on frost durability of C30 CSC: (a)E
r. (b) DF.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
Effect of MB value on frost durability of C60 CSC: (a)E
r. (b) DF.
(a)
(b)Influences of MB value onE
r and DF of C30 and C60 CSC are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. It is apparent that E
r and DF of both C30 and C60 CSC under variable FT cycles decrease with increasing MB value, and the decrease is more pronounced when MB value exceeds 1.0. When MB value increases from 0.3 to 2.0, frost durability grade of C30 CSC decreases from F125 to F25 (DF drops from 30.4% to 8.0% relevantly), while that of C60 CSC decreases from over F300 to F200 (DF drops from 95.7% to 47.2% relevantly). This indicates increase of MB value significantly deteriorates frost durability of C30 and C60 CSC.MB value of CS reflects the relative amount of clay in fines, and an increase of MB value indicates increasing amount of clay in concrete [1, 2]. Consequently, it is supposed that clay accounts for reduction of frost durability. Firstly, clay particles expand after absorbing water in fresh concrete and later shrink to leave voids in hardened concrete, which generates higher porosity and thus decreases strength and impermeability and, secondly, dehydrated clay particles will absorb water again in water-saturated environment, both of which result in a higher water absorption (WA, as seen in Table 4) and increase saturation degree of concrete. Saturation degree is found to be the key factor affecting frost durability [23]. Hence the frost damage is exaggerated during FT cycles, and the higher the MB value of CS is, the greater the frost durability is reduced.


## 3.3. Influence of Lithology of CS on Strength and Frost Durability

One RS and five CSs of different lithologies were selected to prepare concrete according to mix proportions in Table5. The influences of CS lithology on compressive strength and frost durability of CSC were studied, and the frost durability between CSC and RSC with equal W/C was compared.Table 5
Concrete mix proportions and strengths of resultant concrete.
Strength grade
Lithology
Unit weight (kg/m3)
Compressive strength (MPa)
Cement
Water
CA
Sand
Fines
WR
3 d
28 d
C30
RS
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
20.1
37.4
DL
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
21.3
38.1
LS
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
21.9
39.2
GR
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
21.6
40.3
BA
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
22.6
40.1
QZ
327
180
1079
814
0
0.59
20.3
38.9
C60
RS
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
50.5
69.9
DL
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
52.1
71.1
LS
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
53.5
72.9
GR
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
55.7
75.8
BA
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
54.9
74.8
QZ
531
170
1061
738
0
1.86
53.9
72.8As shown in Table5, 28 d compressive strengths of C30 and C60 concrete made with various CSs are within range of 38.1–40.3 MPa and 71.1–75.8 MPa. It can be calculated that the variation coefficient of strength is around 2%, which indicates CS lithology seems to have little impact on compressive strength of C30 and C60 CSC. However, concrete made with granite CS presents relatively higher strength than the other groups. This is probably due to the fact that granite CS particles have higher mechanical strength (lower crushing value) than the others, which increases the mechanical interlocking with cement paste [24]. In addition, the average 28 d compressive strength of CSC is about 5% higher than that of RSC. This can be attributed to the fact that CS particles have tougher surface texture and more angular shape, which enables them to have stronger bonding with cement paste than RS particles do [6, 11].The influences of lithology onE
r and DF of C30 and C60 concrete are shown in Figures 7 and 8. In Figure 7, E
r of C30 concrete prepared with CS of different lithologies are not below 60% until FT cycle number reaches 125, while E
r of all C60 concrete samples are above 90% after 300 FT cycles. This illustrates that frost durability grade of all C30 CSC is F125 while that of all C60 CSC is over F300. Moreover, the DF differences among C30 CSC and C60 CSC are less than 2% which is nearly negligible. Therefore, it can be stated that CS lithology has no prominent influence on strength and frost durability within the lithologies studied.Figure 7
Effect of lithology on frost durability of C30 concrete: (a)E
r. (b) DF.
(a)
(b)Figure 8
Effect of lithology on frost durability of C60 concrete: (a)E
r. (b) DF.
(a)
(b)Figures7 and 8 show that frost durability grades of C30 CSC and RSC are, respectively, F125 and F200, and DF of C30 CSC is 42% lower than that of C30 RSC. However, no remarkable difference is noticed between frost durability grade and DF of C60 CSC and RSC. This manifests that frost durability of C60 CSC is nearly equal to that of C60 RSC, whereas frost durability of C30 CSC is much poorer than that of C30 RSC. This could be due to the fact that microcracks are likely generated on surface of CS particles after crushing [9, 10], which results in water absorption and crushing value of CS particles being much higher than those of RS particles. According to the data in Table 2, water absorption and crushing value of the used RS are 0.53% and 12.4%, and the average water absorption and crushing value of studied CS are 0.95% and 21.4%, which are nearly twice as high as those of RS particles.For C30 concrete with low strength and impermeability, CS particles with high crushing value (low mechanical strength) and water absorption (high permeability), together with the interface between sand particle and cement paste, might be damaged by freezing of water penetrated into concrete, which leads to frost durability of C30 CSC being reduced and poorer than that of C30 RSC. However, as for C60 concrete having high strength and impermeability, the sand particles are so well bonded by cement paste that neither the sand particle nor interface could be frozen to damage. Thus, frost durability of C60 CSC is rarely affected and nearly equal to that of C60 RSC.Crushing values and water absorptions of the used CS are almost around 20% and 0.9%, respectively, which may account for inconspicuous frost durability difference of concrete prepared with CS of various lithologies. Parent rock lithology can affect water absorption and crushing value of CS, and some researcher believed they were related to frost durability of concrete [25, 26]. Therefore, in the next stage of study, more representative CS samples should be selected to investigate the effect of water absorption and crushing value of CS on frost durability.


## 4. Conclusion

Based on the experimental results of this research, the following conclusions can be drawn:(1)
Increasing fines content of dolomite CS improves concrete strength and reduces frost durability of C30 CSC when fines content reaches 10%. However, it has little negative effect on frost durability of C60 CSC.
(2)
Increasing MB value of dolomite CS does not negatively affect strength of C30 CSC but decreases strength of C60 CSC and frost durability of CSC, and the reduction is more pronounced when MB value exceeds 1.0.
(3)
CS lithology has no prominent influence on frost durability and strength of CSC within the lithologies studied.
(4)
Compressive strength of CSC is a little higher than RSC under equal W/C, yet frost durability of CSC is no better than RSC especially for C30 CSC.
(5)
To ensure frost durability of CSC, fines content and MB value of CS should be limited to be less than 10% and 1.0. Air-entraining agent is suggested for enhancing frost durability of C30 CSC exposed to freezing environment.



---

*Source: 2580542-2016-07-10.xml*