# PLA and PP Composite Nonwoven with Antimicrobial Activity for Filtration Applications

Authors: Marta Łatwińska; Jadwiga Sójka-Ledakowicz; Jerzy Chruściel; Maciej Piórkowski
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The PLA (50% wt.)/PP (50% wt.), PLA (47.5% wt.)/PP (47.5% wt.)/paraffin (5% wt.), and PLA (47.25% wt.)/PP (47.25% wt.)/paraffin (5% wt.)/CuO·SiO2 (0.5% wt.) composite nonwovens were obtained in one-step process by using the melt-blown technique. Thermal properties (by the DSC method), physicomechanical parameters, specific surface area, the structure (by the SEM method), the elemental analysis (by the EDS method), and susceptibility to hydrolytic degradation (in alkaline and neutral media) were studied for all the obtained nonwovens. The antimicrobial properties of the composite nonwovens were determined by using dynamic contact conditions method, with three kinds of microorganisms applied. The DSC analysis of nonwovens revealed that the mixing of PLA and PP caused the decrease in homogeneity of both polymers, as well as a considerable increase in the PLA crystallization enthalpy. The paraffin and CuO·SiO2 addition to PLA/PP nonwoven generally improved the filtration properties and downgraded tensile strength. Among all the tested composite nonwovens, the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 was the most and the PLA/PP/paraffin was the least susceptible to hydrolytic degradation in both media used in the study. The PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven revealed strong antibacterial activity and slight activity against the yeast.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Among biodegradable polymers, poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is considered to be commercial and relatively cheap synthetic polymer characterized by good processing properties [1]. In the 1990s, the PLA of high molecular mass was obtained and introduced on an industrial scale, which is why since then the scientific publishing has observed a notably higher interest in the polymer; only in 2008 were over 1100 papers concerning PLA published [1]. PLA has been extensively used in the industrial production to manufacture packaging, cups for beverages, bottles, and nonwovens used for various purposes [2].Good mechanical properties as well as excellent processing properties and a low cost of production make the traditional, nonbiodegradable synthetic polymers based on polyolefins, for example, polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE), highly popular in everyday life. These polymers are used in agriculture, medicine, and industry, including the production of building materials and packaging [3]. Nevertheless, the polymers based on polyolefins are nonbiodegradable and raise serious concerns connected with their disposal and subsequent influence on the environment.So far, scientific papers have mentioned composites which consist of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers, which, thanks to the use of proper ingredients, may help obtain anticipated properties (e.g., mechanical ones), required biodegradation rate and an economically viable price point. As PLA and PP are characterized by similar melting temperatures, the composites which consist of the two polymers are produced in the course of thermal processing. The composites obtained by the melt-blending technique which comprise up to 50% of PLA were described by Choudhary et al. [4]. The analysis of the mechanical properties of the composites indicated a significant improvement in the properties of PLA influenced by the presence of PP. Reddy et al. have worked on the composites which consisted of PP, PLA (up to 10%), and oat hull [5]. The composites were obtained by the injection moulding method. The mechanical properties of the PLA/PP set were only slightly better than the properties of PP alone, while, after the addition of the oat hull and a compatibilizer, some mechanical properties of the composite have improved by 40% in relation to PP. Composite PLA/PP fibres, where the proportion of PLA ranges from 0 to 100%, were analysed by Reddy et al. [6]. It turned out that composite fibres had worse mechanical properties compared to the fibres made from pure polymers. PLA in the composites was characterized by higher resistance to biodegradation and hydrolysis; moreover, the obtained fibres were more susceptible to dying than fibres made from pure PLA and PP.The ions of some metals, such as silver (Ag), zinc (Zn), titanium (Ti), and copper (Cu), as well as their oxides, are characterized by very strong antimicrobial properties [7–10], which is why they may be used for the functionalization of polymer materials. The easiest ways to obtain antimicrobial properties are by the direct implementation of the biocide agent into bulk polymers during processing or by using the surface modification [11, 12]. The examples of the practical use of polymer material whose antimicrobial properties were obtained through ions or oxides of metals may be found, for example, in the works by Park (food packaging) [13], Borkow et al. (filters) [14], and Weinberg et al. (materials for hygienic purposes) [15].The purpose of the current study was to obtain PLA/PP composite nonwovens using the melt-blown technique and to analyse their properties. Apart from requisite mechanical properties and increased biodegradation rate (in comparison to the PP nonwovens), it was planned to induce antimicrobial properties with the use of the CuO·SiO2 addition.


## 2. Materials and Methods

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) was purchased in NatureWorks LLC, type Ingeo™ Biopolymer 3251D, melt flow rate (MFR) 30–40 g/10 min (190°C/2.16 kg), melting point (mp) 160–170°C, and density 1.24 g/cm3. Polypropylene (PP) was purchased in Borealis, type HL 612 FB, MFR 1200 g/10 min (230°C/2.16 kg), mp 158°C, and density 0.9–1.0 g/cm3.The following chemical reagents were applied: liquid paraffin (purchased in PPH Aflopa), copper (II) oxide/silicon dioxide composite (CuO·SiO2, composite granulation 460 nm, provided by Institute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Poznań University of Technology, Poland [16]), tetraborate buffer (pH = 10, Na2B4O7 0.130 mol/dm3 + NaOH 0.060 mol/dm3), and phosphate buffer (pH = 7, KH2PO4 0.071 mol/dm3 + K2HPO4 0.117 mol/dm3).The composite nonwovens were obtained using the melt-blown technique, which is an integrated nonwoven technology which consists in linking the fibre-forming process with web-forming process. The strings of molten polymer come out of the extruder head through the multihole nozzle, where they are blown up by the stream of hot compressed air and set as fine fibres on a collecting drum (Figure1). Laboratory one-screw extruder (Axon product) with head (with 30 holes of 0.35 mm diameter each), compressed air heater, and collecting drum were used.Figure 1
Obtaining of the nonwovens according to the melt-blown technique (http://www.kasen.co.jp/english/product/line/work.html).Three kinds of composite nonwovens were obtained: PLA (50% wt.)/PP (50% wt.), PLA (47.5% wt.)/PP (47.5% wt.)/paraffin (5% wt.), and PLA (47.25% wt.)/PP (47.25% wt.)/paraffin (5% wt.)/CuO·SiO2 (0.5% wt.). Direct (one-step) method was applied, which means that the assumed masses of components were weighed, mixed, and then placed in the extruder feeding hopper. In all cases, the temperature in the zones of the extruder ranged from 220 to 270°C, while for the hot compressed air it was set at 280°C, with the compressed air consumption of 7 m3/h and polymer consumption of 4 g/min. PLA was dried before processing for 3 h at 100°C. All the obtained nonwovens were subject to the comprehensive analysis of their properties.Thermal properties were studied by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) method, on DSC 6200 Exstar SII NanoTechnology apparatus (Seiko product). Samples (ca. 5 mg) were heated in the nitrogen atmosphere (50 mL/min) to 200°C and then cooled to 25°C, with the scanning speed of 5°C/min. Samples were evaluated in triplicate.The following physicomechanical parameters of the composite nonwovens were analysed: mass per unit area (according to PN-EN 29073-1:1994), fibre diameter (according to PN-ISO 137:2000, with the exception of the number of measurements and the preparation of samples), average air permeability (according to PN-EN ISO 9237:1998), and average maximum breaking force and relative elongation at maximum force (according to PN-EN 29073-3:1994).Specific surface area was analysed for samples of the composite nonwovens (samples mass wasca. 2 g) using the 5-point Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method and nitrogen as a sorption agent, on Autosorb-1 apparatus (Quantochrome Instruments product).The structural analysis of the composite nonwovens was performed by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) method using VEGA 3 LMU apparatus (Tescan product), with samples magnification 1000x. The elemental analysis of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven was performed by the energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) method using EDS INCA Energy X-ray microanalyzer (Oxford Instruments Analytical product) connected with VEGA 3 LMU apparatus. The EDS analysis was conducted in low vacuum conditions, with 20 keV energy of the beam of electrons and without the use of a conductive additive.The antimicrobial properties of the composite nonwovens were determined by using the dynamic contact conditions method, according to ASTM E2149-13a. Samples mass1±0.1 g, shaking time of 1 h, and phosphate buffer as reagent were applied. PP nonwoven constituted the reference sample. The growth reduction of microorganisms on the tested sample versus the reference one was evaluated. Two kinds of bacteria (Gram (−)Escherichia coli and Gram (+)Staphylococcus aureus) and one type of yeast (Candida albicans) were applied. Samples of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven were evaluated in triplicate and samples of the other composite nonwovens were evaluated in duplicate.The hydrolytic degradation of the composite nonwovens (according to PN-EN ISO 10993-13:2002) was carried out usingca. 1 g samples, in alkaline (tetraborate buffer) and neutral (phosphate buffer) medium, at 65°C. Samples were evaluated, in duplicate, for change in mass after 21, 42, 63, and 84 days.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Nonwovens Composition

During research works PLA (50% wt.)/PP (50% wt.) composite nonwoven was successfully obtained in a one-step melt-blown process. The challenge of this task was to find the appropriate temperature parameters for the process—sufficiently high to obtain fine fibres and sufficiently low to avoid the thermal decomposition of PLA.In the next stage of the work it was planned to provide the PLA/PP composite nonwoven with antimicrobial properties by adding CuO·SiO2. The addition of a plasticiser was necessary to incorporate the powdery additive of CuO·SiO2 to melt-blown nonwoven by the direct (one-step) method. It was found out that liquid paraffin in the amount of 5% wt. was the best plasticiser for the PLA/PP composite nonwovens.Previous research works with pure PP and pure PLA nonwovens functionalized with CuO·SiO2 revealed that 0.1% and 0.25% CuO·SiO2 content did not provide sufficient antimicrobial activity, especially towardsCandida albicans [17]. In that case the use of at least 0.5% of this additive was needed. While obtaining the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwovens, the irregular operation of the extruder (which resulted in significantly different mass per unit area of subsequent nonwovens) was noticed. According to our experience, it was a signal that—due to the presence of the powdery additive—the extruder head may have clogged. In this situation, the increase of the CuO·SiO2 ratio in the nonwoven was fraught with risk.


### 3.2. Thermal Properties Analysis

The DSC thermograms of pure PLA and PP nonwovens and of the three kinds of composite nonwovens (PLA/PP, PLA/PP/paraffin, and PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2) were presented in Figure 2. The data obtained for these nonwovens were contained in Table 1.Table 1
Temperatures (T) and enthalpies (ΔH) ascribed to peaks on the DSC thermograms of nonwovens.
Number of peak PLA nonwoven PP nonwoven PLA/PPnonwoven PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven 1 62.2± 0.1°C (T)2.7 ± 0.1 J/g (ΔH) — 58.5± 0.1°C (T)1.3 ± 0.2 J/g (ΔH) 58.1± 0,2°C (T)1.5 ± 0,1 J/g (ΔH) 56.5± 0.4°C (T)2.0 ± 0.1 J/g (ΔH) 2 98.8± 0.3°C (T)−14.8 ± 0.1 J/g (ΔH) — 80.8± 0.5°C (T)−10.6 ± 0.3 J/g (ΔH) 80.0± 0.4°C (T)−12.8 ± 0.6 J/g (ΔH) 81.8± 0.2°C (T)−14.5 ± 0.5 J/g (ΔH) 3 168.0± 0.1°C (T)24.4 ± 0.4 J/g (ΔH) 162.6± 0.6°C (T)84.0 ± 0.1 J/g (ΔH) 162.9± 0.1°C (T)64.7 ± 2.3 J/g (ΔH) 162.4± 0.4°C (T)53.1 ± 1.5 J/g (ΔH) 162.4± 0.2°C (T)54.5 ± 1.0 J/g (ΔH) 4 — 118.3± 0.2°C (T)−103.7 ± 0.9 J/g (ΔH) 117.9± 0.1°C (T)−49.3 ± 1.6 J/g (ΔH) 115.2± 0.1°C (T)−42.4 ± 0.9 J/g (ΔH) 119.9± 0.1°C (T)−49.2 ± 2.0 J/g (ΔH) 5 100.2± 0.6°C (T)−3.8 ± 0.4 J/g (ΔH) — 96.9± 0.2°C (T)−13.8 ± 1.2 J/g (ΔH) 96.3± 0.1°C (T)−13.4 ± 0.2 J/g (ΔH) 101.5± 0.2°C (T)−11.8 ± 0.2 J/g (ΔH)Figure 2
DSC thermograms of the nonwovens: (a) PLA, (b) PP, (c) PLA/PP, (d) PLA/PP/paraffin, and (e) PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2.
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)Peaks numbering in Table1 was established on the basis of the sequence in which the peaks appeared in the DSC thermograms, which means that Peaks 1, 2, and 3 are consecutive peaks from the left on the bottom curve (corresponding to the heating process) and Peaks 4 and 5 are consecutive peaks from the right on the top curve (corresponding to the cooling process) (Figure 2).Having analysed the data in Table1, it can be stated that the mixing of PLA and PP caused the decrease of temperatures of all peaks which appeared on pure PLA and pure PP nonwovens thermograms (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). This phenomenon can be explained by the decrease in homogeneity of PLA and PP as a consequence of polymers mixing.In the case of the composite nonwovens, the temperatures of peaks either decreased after the addition of the subsequent component or decreased after the addition of paraffin and then increased after the addition of CuO·SiO2. The first tendency was observed for the endothermic processes peaks, that is, Peaks 1 (PLA glass transition) and Peaks 3 (simultaneous PLA and PP melting) (Figures 2(c), 2(d), and 2(e)). The second tendency concerned the exothermic processes peaks, that is, Peaks 2 (PLA recrystallization), Peaks 4 (PP crystallization), and Peaks 5 (PLA crystallization). It can be assumed that the paraffin and CuO·SiO2 addition decreased the homogeneity of the PLA/PP composite nonwoven, which resulted in the decrease of temperature during the endothermic processes. The tendency observed for exothermic processes could be explained by the decrease in the number of crystallization nuclei after the paraffin addition and the increase in the number of crystallization nuclei after the subsequent CuO·SiO2 addition. The high number of the crystallization nuclei (as a consequence of the CuO·SiO2 presence) particularly influenced the PP and PLA crystallization temperatures (Peaks 4 and 5), which resulted in higher temperatures in the case of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven as compared to other composite nonwovens or even to pure PLA and pure PP nonwovens.While analysing the PLA glass transition enthalpy (Peaks 1), the following changes of the absorbed energy were observed (Table1): a decrease after the mixing of PLA and PP and a slight growth after paraffin and CuO·SiO2 addition to the PLA/PP composite nonwoven. The amount of PP in the composite nonwoven sample determined the enthalpy in the case of PLA and PP simultaneous melting process (Peaks 3). It resulted from the fact that the PP melting enthalpy is over three times greater than the PLA one and even slight differences in PLA/PP ratio in the samples caused significant changes in the obtained enthalpy of simultaneous melting process (Table 1). In the case of exothermic processes (Peaks 2, 4, and 5), no clear tendency regarding enthalpy emerged, except for significant increase in PLA crystallization enthalpy after the mixing of PLA and PP (Peaks 5). It may indicate that PLA is less amorphous in the composite nonwovens compared to a pure PLA one. The apparent decrease in PP crystallization enthalpy visible when pure PP nonwoven is compared with the composite nonwovens (Peaks 4) is caused by a smaller PP content in the latter.


### 3.3. Physicomechanical Parameters

The physicomechanical parameters of composite nonwovens were presented in Table2. As the values of mass per unit areas of all analysed composite nonwovens were similar, it was possible to compare these nonwovens with respect to other physicomechanical parameters (Table 2).Table 2
Mass per unit area, fibre diameter, average air permeability, average maximum breaking force, and relative elongation at maximum force of the composite nonwovens.
Analysed parameter PLA/PPnonwoven PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven Mass per unit area (g/m2) 159± 3 143± 2 149± 10 Fibre diameter (µm) Average 8.91 7.75 4.23 Minimal 2.17 1.99 0.91 Maximal 22.89 20.72 10.09 Average air permeability (mm/s) 100 Pa 468± 17 510± 20 426± 25 200 Pa 920± 30 990± 30 840± 50 Average maximum breaking force (N) Machine direction 42.6± 4.2 33.3± 4.0 10.8± 1.9 Cross direction 34.1± 1.1 26.4± 3.4 8.2± 3.1 Relative elongation at maximum force (%) Machine direction 18.0± 1.5 28.0± 3.5 3.5± 0.5 Cross direction 19.5± 4.5 25.0± 8.5 4.0± 1.5The PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven showed the smallest average fibre diameter (Table 2). For the other composite nonwovens, this parameter was approximately two times greater, and the PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven average fibre diameter was a little smaller. The average air permeability, which is connected with the fibre diameter, was the smallest for the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven as expected, but the other composite nonwovens showed similar value of this parameter. It can be stated that frequently observed precise correlation between the fibre diameter and the average air permeability did not occur. Analysed parameters showed good filtration properties of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven.Data concerning strength parameters indicated the lowest resistance to break and the lowest elasticity of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven (Table 2). The PLA/PP/paraffin composite nonwoven was about three times more resistant to break and about seven times more elastic, while the PLA/PP nonwoven was about four times more resistant to break and about five times more elastic. All the above data showed poor strength properties of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven, which probably resulted from the addition of the powdery CuO·SiO2. Moreover, the data confirmed the positive effect of the paraffin on the elasticity of the PLA/PP/paraffin composite nonwoven and the negative effect of the paraffin and CuO·SiO2 addition on the resistance to break of the PLA/PP composite nonwoven.


### 3.4. Specific Surface Area

The analyses did not confirm the anticipated correlation between the fibre diameter and the specific surface area of composite nonwovens (the finer the fibres are, the greater the surface area is). Taking into account measurement uncertainty, the specific surface area of all the tested nonwovens was the same and reached the following values:0.37±0.03 m2/g for the PLA/PP composite nonwoven, 0.34±0.03 m2/g for the PLA/PP/paraffin composite nonwoven, and 0.38±0.02 m2/g for the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven.The values of specific surface area obtained for composite nonwovens were compared to specific surface area measured with the use of the same method for similar material—polyacrylonitrile (PAN) electrospun nanofiber nonwoven [18]. In the case of the PAN nonwoven the fibre diameter was 1.3 μm and the specific surface area was 2 m2/g. As the elementary fibre diameter of composite nonwovens was three to seven times greater, the specific surface area which is five times smaller correlates very well with the data obtained for the PAN nonwoven.


### 3.5. Structural Analysis and Elemental Analysis

Scanning electron microscope images of composite nonwovens were presented in Figure3. Microscope scans confirmed the fibre diameter measurements: the finest fibres for the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven, the intermediate fibres for the PLA/PP/paraffin composite nonwoven, and the thickest fibres for the PLA/PP composite nonwoven were clearly visible (Figure 3). The presence of the powdery CuO·SiO2 on the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven image was anticipated; however, it was not observed (Figure 3(c)). The reason for this situation may be as little as 0.5% CuO·SiO2 content in the composite nonwoven.Figure 3
SEM images of the composite nonwovens: (a) PLA/PP, (b) PLA/PP/paraffin, and (c) PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2.
(a) (b) (c)The data concerning the elemental analysis (X-ray microanalysis) of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven were presented in Table 3. The calculated theoretical contents of Cu and Si in the composite nonwoven were 0.23% and 0.10%, respectively. It can be stated that although the content measured for Si is very similar to theoretical one (0.08%), the value measured for Cu is 2 times smaller (0.12%). The calculated theoretical Cu/Si mass ratio (2.27) is also smaller than that calculated on the basis of the obtained data (1.50). Both the differences between theoretical calculations and the performed elemental analysis may stem from the partial thermal reduction of CuO to Cu which occurred during the processing. The resulting Cu atoms, not connected with SiO2, may easily deposit on the inner elements of the extruder.Table 3
The elemental analysis performed by the EDS method for the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven.
Analysed element C O Si Cu Average value 76.83± 0.41% 22.97± 0.41% 0.08± 0.01% 0.12± 0.01%


### 3.6. Antimicrobial Properties

The antimicrobial activity values of the composite nonwovens were presented in Table4. The antimicrobial activity value is the subtraction logC − logA, where logC is a logarithm of the number of colonies on the reference sample (i.e., the PP nonwoven) and logA is a logarithm of the number of colonies on the analysed sample (i.e., the composite nonwoven). According to the standard EN ISO 20743:2013 and in accordance with the microbiological laboratories practise, the antimicrobial activity value below 0.5 means no activity, that between 0.5 and 2 means slight activity, that between 2 and 3 means significant activity, and that above 3 means strong activity.Table 4
Antimicrobial activity values of the composite nonwovens.
Analysed microorganism(number of strain) PLA/PPnonwoven PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) 0.0± 0.0 0.0± 0.0 3.6± 0.1 Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) 0.0± 0.0 0.0± 0.0 3.9± 0.1 Candida albicans (ATCC 10321) 0.0± 0.0 0.0± 0.0 1.4± 0.4It turned out that the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven revealed strong antimicrobial activity towards both kinds of bacteria—Gram (−)Escherichia coli and Gram (+)Staphylococcus aureus—and practically completely reduced their growth (Table 4). In the case of yeastCandida albicans the discussed nonwoven demonstrated only slight activity. The other composite nonwovens did not reveal any antimicrobial activity, as expected. The obtained results indicated the antimicrobial properties of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven, although only 0.5% addition of the bioactive modifier was applied and even though the actual CuO·SiO2 content (measured by the X-ray microanalysis) was twice as small (about 0.25%).


### 3.7. Hydrolytic Degradation

The decrease in the mass of the PLA/PP, PLA/PP/paraffin, and PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwovens after hydrolytic degradation in different media was shown in graph (Figure 4).Figure 4
Hydrolytic degradation of the composite nonwovens: (a) in tetraborate buffer (pH = 10) and (b) in phosphate buffer (pH = 7).
(a) (b)Having analysed the results presented in Figure4(a) it can be stated that the hydrolysis of all kinds of composite nonwovens in alkaline medium (more precisely, hydrolysis of PLA present in these nonwovens) was complete within 42 days. Differences in alkaline hydrolysis rates for different kinds of composite nonwovens appeared after 21 days. For this time, the greatest mass decrease for the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven (35%), the intermediate mass decrease for the PLA/PP nonwoven (32%), and the smallest mass decrease for the PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven (27%) were observed. Mass decreases of PLA alone, calculated with respect to the theoretical contents of this polymer in the composite nonwovens, were 73%, 64%, and 56%, respectively.The hydrolysis of the composite nonwovens in the neutral medium was not finished for 84 days (Figure4(b)). After this time, the mass decrease of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven reached the value of 38%, which corresponds to 81% mass decrease of the PLA amount theoretically contained in the nonwoven and the mass decrease of the PLA/PP nonwoven was smaller and reached 37% (74% of theoretical PLA contents), whereas the mass decrease of the PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven was the smallest and amounted to 29% (62% of theoretical PLA contents). The hydrolysis in neutral medium confirmed the tendency observed previously in the alkaline medium, that is, the fact that the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven was the most and the PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven was the least susceptible to hydrolytic degradation among all kinds of composite nonwovens. This tendency can be explained by the changes in the hydrophilicity of the composite nonwovens—the paraffin addition to the PLA/PP nonwoven increased the hydrophobicity and slowed down the hydrolysis, whereas the addition of the polar CuO·SiO2 increased the hydrophilicity causing significant acceleration of the hydrolysis.


## 3.1. Nonwovens Composition

During research works PLA (50% wt.)/PP (50% wt.) composite nonwoven was successfully obtained in a one-step melt-blown process. The challenge of this task was to find the appropriate temperature parameters for the process—sufficiently high to obtain fine fibres and sufficiently low to avoid the thermal decomposition of PLA.In the next stage of the work it was planned to provide the PLA/PP composite nonwoven with antimicrobial properties by adding CuO·SiO2. The addition of a plasticiser was necessary to incorporate the powdery additive of CuO·SiO2 to melt-blown nonwoven by the direct (one-step) method. It was found out that liquid paraffin in the amount of 5% wt. was the best plasticiser for the PLA/PP composite nonwovens.Previous research works with pure PP and pure PLA nonwovens functionalized with CuO·SiO2 revealed that 0.1% and 0.25% CuO·SiO2 content did not provide sufficient antimicrobial activity, especially towardsCandida albicans [17]. In that case the use of at least 0.5% of this additive was needed. While obtaining the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwovens, the irregular operation of the extruder (which resulted in significantly different mass per unit area of subsequent nonwovens) was noticed. According to our experience, it was a signal that—due to the presence of the powdery additive—the extruder head may have clogged. In this situation, the increase of the CuO·SiO2 ratio in the nonwoven was fraught with risk.


## 3.2. Thermal Properties Analysis

The DSC thermograms of pure PLA and PP nonwovens and of the three kinds of composite nonwovens (PLA/PP, PLA/PP/paraffin, and PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2) were presented in Figure 2. The data obtained for these nonwovens were contained in Table 1.Table 1
Temperatures (T) and enthalpies (ΔH) ascribed to peaks on the DSC thermograms of nonwovens.
Number of peak PLA nonwoven PP nonwoven PLA/PPnonwoven PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven 1 62.2± 0.1°C (T)2.7 ± 0.1 J/g (ΔH) — 58.5± 0.1°C (T)1.3 ± 0.2 J/g (ΔH) 58.1± 0,2°C (T)1.5 ± 0,1 J/g (ΔH) 56.5± 0.4°C (T)2.0 ± 0.1 J/g (ΔH) 2 98.8± 0.3°C (T)−14.8 ± 0.1 J/g (ΔH) — 80.8± 0.5°C (T)−10.6 ± 0.3 J/g (ΔH) 80.0± 0.4°C (T)−12.8 ± 0.6 J/g (ΔH) 81.8± 0.2°C (T)−14.5 ± 0.5 J/g (ΔH) 3 168.0± 0.1°C (T)24.4 ± 0.4 J/g (ΔH) 162.6± 0.6°C (T)84.0 ± 0.1 J/g (ΔH) 162.9± 0.1°C (T)64.7 ± 2.3 J/g (ΔH) 162.4± 0.4°C (T)53.1 ± 1.5 J/g (ΔH) 162.4± 0.2°C (T)54.5 ± 1.0 J/g (ΔH) 4 — 118.3± 0.2°C (T)−103.7 ± 0.9 J/g (ΔH) 117.9± 0.1°C (T)−49.3 ± 1.6 J/g (ΔH) 115.2± 0.1°C (T)−42.4 ± 0.9 J/g (ΔH) 119.9± 0.1°C (T)−49.2 ± 2.0 J/g (ΔH) 5 100.2± 0.6°C (T)−3.8 ± 0.4 J/g (ΔH) — 96.9± 0.2°C (T)−13.8 ± 1.2 J/g (ΔH) 96.3± 0.1°C (T)−13.4 ± 0.2 J/g (ΔH) 101.5± 0.2°C (T)−11.8 ± 0.2 J/g (ΔH)Figure 2
DSC thermograms of the nonwovens: (a) PLA, (b) PP, (c) PLA/PP, (d) PLA/PP/paraffin, and (e) PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2.
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)Peaks numbering in Table1 was established on the basis of the sequence in which the peaks appeared in the DSC thermograms, which means that Peaks 1, 2, and 3 are consecutive peaks from the left on the bottom curve (corresponding to the heating process) and Peaks 4 and 5 are consecutive peaks from the right on the top curve (corresponding to the cooling process) (Figure 2).Having analysed the data in Table1, it can be stated that the mixing of PLA and PP caused the decrease of temperatures of all peaks which appeared on pure PLA and pure PP nonwovens thermograms (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). This phenomenon can be explained by the decrease in homogeneity of PLA and PP as a consequence of polymers mixing.In the case of the composite nonwovens, the temperatures of peaks either decreased after the addition of the subsequent component or decreased after the addition of paraffin and then increased after the addition of CuO·SiO2. The first tendency was observed for the endothermic processes peaks, that is, Peaks 1 (PLA glass transition) and Peaks 3 (simultaneous PLA and PP melting) (Figures 2(c), 2(d), and 2(e)). The second tendency concerned the exothermic processes peaks, that is, Peaks 2 (PLA recrystallization), Peaks 4 (PP crystallization), and Peaks 5 (PLA crystallization). It can be assumed that the paraffin and CuO·SiO2 addition decreased the homogeneity of the PLA/PP composite nonwoven, which resulted in the decrease of temperature during the endothermic processes. The tendency observed for exothermic processes could be explained by the decrease in the number of crystallization nuclei after the paraffin addition and the increase in the number of crystallization nuclei after the subsequent CuO·SiO2 addition. The high number of the crystallization nuclei (as a consequence of the CuO·SiO2 presence) particularly influenced the PP and PLA crystallization temperatures (Peaks 4 and 5), which resulted in higher temperatures in the case of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven as compared to other composite nonwovens or even to pure PLA and pure PP nonwovens.While analysing the PLA glass transition enthalpy (Peaks 1), the following changes of the absorbed energy were observed (Table1): a decrease after the mixing of PLA and PP and a slight growth after paraffin and CuO·SiO2 addition to the PLA/PP composite nonwoven. The amount of PP in the composite nonwoven sample determined the enthalpy in the case of PLA and PP simultaneous melting process (Peaks 3). It resulted from the fact that the PP melting enthalpy is over three times greater than the PLA one and even slight differences in PLA/PP ratio in the samples caused significant changes in the obtained enthalpy of simultaneous melting process (Table 1). In the case of exothermic processes (Peaks 2, 4, and 5), no clear tendency regarding enthalpy emerged, except for significant increase in PLA crystallization enthalpy after the mixing of PLA and PP (Peaks 5). It may indicate that PLA is less amorphous in the composite nonwovens compared to a pure PLA one. The apparent decrease in PP crystallization enthalpy visible when pure PP nonwoven is compared with the composite nonwovens (Peaks 4) is caused by a smaller PP content in the latter.


## 3.3. Physicomechanical Parameters

The physicomechanical parameters of composite nonwovens were presented in Table2. As the values of mass per unit areas of all analysed composite nonwovens were similar, it was possible to compare these nonwovens with respect to other physicomechanical parameters (Table 2).Table 2
Mass per unit area, fibre diameter, average air permeability, average maximum breaking force, and relative elongation at maximum force of the composite nonwovens.
Analysed parameter PLA/PPnonwoven PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven Mass per unit area (g/m2) 159± 3 143± 2 149± 10 Fibre diameter (µm) Average 8.91 7.75 4.23 Minimal 2.17 1.99 0.91 Maximal 22.89 20.72 10.09 Average air permeability (mm/s) 100 Pa 468± 17 510± 20 426± 25 200 Pa 920± 30 990± 30 840± 50 Average maximum breaking force (N) Machine direction 42.6± 4.2 33.3± 4.0 10.8± 1.9 Cross direction 34.1± 1.1 26.4± 3.4 8.2± 3.1 Relative elongation at maximum force (%) Machine direction 18.0± 1.5 28.0± 3.5 3.5± 0.5 Cross direction 19.5± 4.5 25.0± 8.5 4.0± 1.5The PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven showed the smallest average fibre diameter (Table 2). For the other composite nonwovens, this parameter was approximately two times greater, and the PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven average fibre diameter was a little smaller. The average air permeability, which is connected with the fibre diameter, was the smallest for the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven as expected, but the other composite nonwovens showed similar value of this parameter. It can be stated that frequently observed precise correlation between the fibre diameter and the average air permeability did not occur. Analysed parameters showed good filtration properties of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven.Data concerning strength parameters indicated the lowest resistance to break and the lowest elasticity of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven (Table 2). The PLA/PP/paraffin composite nonwoven was about three times more resistant to break and about seven times more elastic, while the PLA/PP nonwoven was about four times more resistant to break and about five times more elastic. All the above data showed poor strength properties of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven, which probably resulted from the addition of the powdery CuO·SiO2. Moreover, the data confirmed the positive effect of the paraffin on the elasticity of the PLA/PP/paraffin composite nonwoven and the negative effect of the paraffin and CuO·SiO2 addition on the resistance to break of the PLA/PP composite nonwoven.


## 3.4. Specific Surface Area

The analyses did not confirm the anticipated correlation between the fibre diameter and the specific surface area of composite nonwovens (the finer the fibres are, the greater the surface area is). Taking into account measurement uncertainty, the specific surface area of all the tested nonwovens was the same and reached the following values:0.37±0.03 m2/g for the PLA/PP composite nonwoven, 0.34±0.03 m2/g for the PLA/PP/paraffin composite nonwoven, and 0.38±0.02 m2/g for the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven.The values of specific surface area obtained for composite nonwovens were compared to specific surface area measured with the use of the same method for similar material—polyacrylonitrile (PAN) electrospun nanofiber nonwoven [18]. In the case of the PAN nonwoven the fibre diameter was 1.3 μm and the specific surface area was 2 m2/g. As the elementary fibre diameter of composite nonwovens was three to seven times greater, the specific surface area which is five times smaller correlates very well with the data obtained for the PAN nonwoven.


## 3.5. Structural Analysis and Elemental Analysis

Scanning electron microscope images of composite nonwovens were presented in Figure3. Microscope scans confirmed the fibre diameter measurements: the finest fibres for the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven, the intermediate fibres for the PLA/PP/paraffin composite nonwoven, and the thickest fibres for the PLA/PP composite nonwoven were clearly visible (Figure 3). The presence of the powdery CuO·SiO2 on the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven image was anticipated; however, it was not observed (Figure 3(c)). The reason for this situation may be as little as 0.5% CuO·SiO2 content in the composite nonwoven.Figure 3
SEM images of the composite nonwovens: (a) PLA/PP, (b) PLA/PP/paraffin, and (c) PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2.
(a) (b) (c)The data concerning the elemental analysis (X-ray microanalysis) of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven were presented in Table 3. The calculated theoretical contents of Cu and Si in the composite nonwoven were 0.23% and 0.10%, respectively. It can be stated that although the content measured for Si is very similar to theoretical one (0.08%), the value measured for Cu is 2 times smaller (0.12%). The calculated theoretical Cu/Si mass ratio (2.27) is also smaller than that calculated on the basis of the obtained data (1.50). Both the differences between theoretical calculations and the performed elemental analysis may stem from the partial thermal reduction of CuO to Cu which occurred during the processing. The resulting Cu atoms, not connected with SiO2, may easily deposit on the inner elements of the extruder.Table 3
The elemental analysis performed by the EDS method for the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven.
Analysed element C O Si Cu Average value 76.83± 0.41% 22.97± 0.41% 0.08± 0.01% 0.12± 0.01%


## 3.6. Antimicrobial Properties

The antimicrobial activity values of the composite nonwovens were presented in Table4. The antimicrobial activity value is the subtraction logC − logA, where logC is a logarithm of the number of colonies on the reference sample (i.e., the PP nonwoven) and logA is a logarithm of the number of colonies on the analysed sample (i.e., the composite nonwoven). According to the standard EN ISO 20743:2013 and in accordance with the microbiological laboratories practise, the antimicrobial activity value below 0.5 means no activity, that between 0.5 and 2 means slight activity, that between 2 and 3 means significant activity, and that above 3 means strong activity.Table 4
Antimicrobial activity values of the composite nonwovens.
Analysed microorganism(number of strain) PLA/PPnonwoven PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) 0.0± 0.0 0.0± 0.0 3.6± 0.1 Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) 0.0± 0.0 0.0± 0.0 3.9± 0.1 Candida albicans (ATCC 10321) 0.0± 0.0 0.0± 0.0 1.4± 0.4It turned out that the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven revealed strong antimicrobial activity towards both kinds of bacteria—Gram (−)Escherichia coli and Gram (+)Staphylococcus aureus—and practically completely reduced their growth (Table 4). In the case of yeastCandida albicans the discussed nonwoven demonstrated only slight activity. The other composite nonwovens did not reveal any antimicrobial activity, as expected. The obtained results indicated the antimicrobial properties of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven, although only 0.5% addition of the bioactive modifier was applied and even though the actual CuO·SiO2 content (measured by the X-ray microanalysis) was twice as small (about 0.25%).


## 3.7. Hydrolytic Degradation

The decrease in the mass of the PLA/PP, PLA/PP/paraffin, and PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwovens after hydrolytic degradation in different media was shown in graph (Figure 4).Figure 4
Hydrolytic degradation of the composite nonwovens: (a) in tetraborate buffer (pH = 10) and (b) in phosphate buffer (pH = 7).
(a) (b)Having analysed the results presented in Figure4(a) it can be stated that the hydrolysis of all kinds of composite nonwovens in alkaline medium (more precisely, hydrolysis of PLA present in these nonwovens) was complete within 42 days. Differences in alkaline hydrolysis rates for different kinds of composite nonwovens appeared after 21 days. For this time, the greatest mass decrease for the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven (35%), the intermediate mass decrease for the PLA/PP nonwoven (32%), and the smallest mass decrease for the PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven (27%) were observed. Mass decreases of PLA alone, calculated with respect to the theoretical contents of this polymer in the composite nonwovens, were 73%, 64%, and 56%, respectively.The hydrolysis of the composite nonwovens in the neutral medium was not finished for 84 days (Figure4(b)). After this time, the mass decrease of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven reached the value of 38%, which corresponds to 81% mass decrease of the PLA amount theoretically contained in the nonwoven and the mass decrease of the PLA/PP nonwoven was smaller and reached 37% (74% of theoretical PLA contents), whereas the mass decrease of the PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven was the smallest and amounted to 29% (62% of theoretical PLA contents). The hydrolysis in neutral medium confirmed the tendency observed previously in the alkaline medium, that is, the fact that the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven was the most and the PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven was the least susceptible to hydrolytic degradation among all kinds of composite nonwovens. This tendency can be explained by the changes in the hydrophilicity of the composite nonwovens—the paraffin addition to the PLA/PP nonwoven increased the hydrophobicity and slowed down the hydrolysis, whereas the addition of the polar CuO·SiO2 increased the hydrophilicity causing significant acceleration of the hydrolysis.


## 4. Conclusions

Three kinds of the composite nonwovens—PLA/PP 50/50, PLA/PP/paraffin 47.5/47.5/5, and PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 47.25/47.25/5/0.5—were obtained with the use of the melt-blown technique, in a direct (one-step) process. The DSC analysis revealed that the mixing of PLA and PP caused the decrease in homogeneity of both polymers. Having compared the DSC thermograms of the composite nonwovens it was stated that the subsequent addition of paraffin and CuO·SiO2 to the PLA/PP nonwoven caused endothermic processes temperatures to decrease and first the decrease and then increase of the temperatures of exothermic processes. The enthalpies of all the analysed processes did not reveal any significant tendency, except for considerable increase in the PLA crystallization enthalpy after the mixing of PLA and PP, which suggested that PLA was less amorphous in the composite nonwovens compared to a pure PLA one. The analysis of the physicomechanical parameters of the composite nonwovens showed that the smallest average fibre diameter and the smallest average air permeability were demonstrated by the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven, which indicated the best filtration properties of this nonwoven. At the same time, the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven showed the lowest resistance to break and the lowest elasticity. The correlation between the fibre diameter and the specific surface area of the composite nonwovens was not found—the specific surface area of all the tested nonwovens was the same taking into account measurement uncertainty. Structural analysis confirmed the fibre diameter measurements—the finest fibres for the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven and the thickest fibres for the PLA/PP composite nonwoven were clearly visible. The data concerning the elemental analysis of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven indicated that the real Cu content was twice as small as the theoretical one. It may stem from the partial thermal reduction of CuO to Cu during the processing and as a consequence of the depositing of the Cu atoms on the inner elements of the extruder. The analysis of the antimicrobial properties revealed strong antibacterial activity and slight activity against the yeast of the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven at as little as 0.5% active CuO·SiO2 addition. The other composite nonwovens did not reveal any antimicrobial activity, as expected. The hydrolysis of the composite nonwovens in alkaline and neutral media led to the conclusion that the PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 nonwoven was the most and the PLA/PP/paraffin nonwoven was the least susceptible to hydrolytic degradation. This observation can be explained by the changes in hydrophilicity of the PLA/PP composite nonwoven after paraffin and then CuO·SiO2 addition. To summarize the conclusions, it should be highlighted that the obtained PLA/PP/paraffin/CuO·SiO2 composite nonwoven showed fine properties (with the exception of the resistance to break and the elasticity), including excellent antibacterial properties against Gram (+) and Gram (−) bacteria. For these reasons, the prepared bioactive composite nonwoven can be applied as a filtration material in multilayered systems.



---

*Source: 2510372-2016-10-26.xml*