# Detecting IKEv1 Man-in-the-Middle Attack with Message-RTT Analysis

Authors: Yunxiao Sun; Bailing Wang; Hongri Liu; Yuliang Wei; Di Wu; Jing Wang
Journal: Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

The IPSec has been a widely used VPN (virtual private network) protocol due to its security and convenience. The security of IPsec itself plays a fundamental role in the overall security of the application system. However, it can be found from the existing research that because of some insecurity issues in the application process, the IPsec protocol will suffer from the man-in-the-middle attack. In this paper, we constructed the first experiment environment of IKE (Internet Key Exchange) man-in-the-middle detecting, use normal distribution to detect the RTT (round-trip time), and get 90% of accuracy.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

IPsec is a secure network protocol suite that authenticates and encrypts network packets to allow safe encrypted communication between two computers over an Internet protocol network [1]. IPSec is a commonly used protocol for building VPN (virtual private network) tunnels that provide security for VPN negotiations and network access to random hosts. IKE (Internet Key Exchange) is a key management protocol that is used in conjunction with the IPSec protocol. It is a way of sharing encryption and authentication keys over an insecure channel. The IKE functions work in two stages: (1) creates an authenticated communication channel between peers by employing methods such as the Diffie-Hellman key exchange, which provides a shared key that is used to further encrypt IKE conversations; (2) the peers use the secure communication channel to negotiate security on behalf of other services such as IPSec. These methods result in the creation of two unidirectional channels, one inbound and the other outgoing.Various security protocols have developed methods to protect against man-in-the-middle attacks over time. Asymmetric key agreement technology is used in all mainstream security protocols, including TLS, SSH, and IKE. The man-in-the-middle attacks can disrupt the key exchange process by replacing both parties’ public keys. As a result, identity authentication is incorporated into security protocols. Different techniques of attacking the IPSec protocol have been documented in the literature [2–4], and man-in-the-middle attacks have always been a major threat source for security protocols [5]. Wireless networks, local area networks, and even wide-area networks are all vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks. Users may or may not have a clear perception when an attack happens.The man-in-the-middle attack detection method is also distinct from methods used in typical intrusion detect systems [6]. Man-in-the-middle attacks have a better level of concealment than typical network attack methods like SQL injection and remote code execution. The network traffic was indistinguishable from normal traffic at the time of the attack. Man-in-the-middle attacks are impossible to protect against with firewalls and intrusion detection systems. Mirsky et al. [7] designed a man-in-the-middle attack detection algorithm named Vesper, which can identify man-in-the-middle attacks in LAN networks by measuring the RTT of echo packets. However, this method cannot detect attacks against specific application protocols and is difficult to apply to the WAN environment. According to current research, the IKE protocol is widely used, but there are also various attacks against the protocol. If the user selects the preshared key authentication mode, when a man-in-the-middle attack occurs, neither the client nor the server can perceive the existence of the attack. Therefore, it has become an important task to study how to detect man-in-the-middle attacks in the IKE communication process. This paper provides a calculating approach based on RTT delay to detect whether there is a man-in-the-middle in the communication process to check and prevent the existence of man-in-the-middle attacks in the IPsec application process.Our main contributions are as follows: (1) built the experimental environment for the IKE man-in-the-middle attack; (2) analyzed the statistical properties of RTT and concluded that RTT conforms to a normal distribution; (3) proposed a man-in-the-middle attack detection algorithm for IKE based on the confidential intervals of normal distribution, which achieved 90% accuracy rate; and (4) found the problem of unintentional leakage of the preshared key through case study. Compared with the existing methods, our proposed algorithm is nonintrusive to the system, only uses network traffic, and does not need to change the IPSec software source code and network topology. The algorithm has certain versatility and may be integrated into the intrusion detection system or applied to the man-in-the-middle attack detection of other security protocols.


## 2. Background Knowledge

The MITM attacker’s ability is the Dolev-Yao model. The attacker can modify or delete message from the network. The middle-man model is based on the Dolev-Yao model. The main capabilities include the following:(i)
Familiar with modern cryptography. The attacker can decrypt the message with the right key(ii)
Familiar with the protocol and know the entities involved in the protocol(iii)
Has complete control over the network and can eavesdrop and intercept any messages transmitted in the systemIn IKEv1, the main mode is an instantiation of the ISAKMP (Internet Security Association Key Management Protocol) identity protect exchange: the first two messages negotiate policy; the next two exchange Diffie-Hellman public values and ancillary data (e.g., nonces) necessary for the exchange; and the last two messages authenticate the Diffie-Hellman exchange. The authentication method negotiated as part of the initial ISAKMP exchange influences the composition of the payloads but not their purpose. The result of either main mode or aggressive mode is three groups of authenticated keying material shown in equations (1)–(4). The Niand Nr are the nonces generated by the initiator and the responder separately. The x and y are the Diffie-Hellman public key of the peers, which are known as key exchange payload in the IKE message. The CKYi and CKYr are the SPI (Security Parameter Index) in the IKE message. The function PRF means pseudorandom function, which is used as the algorithm to derive key materials. SKEYID is the key seed, SKYEID_e is the key material used by ISAKMP SA to protect the confidentiality of its messages, SKYEID_a is the key material that ISAKMP SA uses to authenticate its messages, and SKYEID_d is the key material used to derive keys for non-ISAKMP SA.
(1)SKEYID=PRFpre_shared_key,NiNr,(2)SKYEID_d=PRFSKEYID,gxy,CKYiCKYr0,(3)SKYEID_a=PRFSKEYID,SKYEID_d,gxy,CKYiCKYr1,(4)SKYEID_e=PRFSKEYID,SKYEID_a,gxy,CKYiCKYr2.Because Diffie-Hellman is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks, IKE introduced an identity authentication mechanism to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks during key exchange. IKEv1’s identity authentication mechanism includes four types: two RSA-based methods, a digital signature-based method, and a preshared key-based method. The first three methods require the IPSec network administrator to issue a certificate for the user, and the user imports the certificate on their client device. The preshared key method requires the IPSec administrator to set a string password and send the string password to the user for configuration. The preshared key method is easy to operate and widely used. This type of authentication method is commonly used for VPN services for sale, and it is also used by many colleges and enterprises. Because users and network administrators do not have a deep understanding of the IPSec protocol, it is generally believed that the username and password used for login are required to be kept secret, and the preshared key does not need to be kept secret.Through the analysis of the IKE key derivation process, when the man-in-the-middle attacker obtains the PSK, he can calculate the communication key with the client and the server, respectively, which shown in Figure1.Figure 1
The man-in-the-middle attack of IKE.The attacker controls the communication link between the initiator and the responder and can forward network packets and modify the content of the packets. In the message exchange process of the IKE protocol, the initiator first sends its SA proposal to the responder, and the responder selects the optimal combination of cryptographic algorithms from the SA proposal according to a certain security policy. At this stage, the attacker needs to parse the information necessary for the man-in-the-middle attack from the received message and forward the message without modifying the message content. In the second pair of messages, the initiator and the responder need to exchange the Diffie-Hellman public key and the nonce for the calculation of the key material. The attacker needs to generate two pair of Diffie-Hellman keys, including the public keys and the private keys, replace the initiator’s public keykei with his own public key fake_kei, and replace the responder’s public key ker with his own public key fake_ker. After the public key replacement is completed, the attacker can negotiate key material with the initiator and responder separately by the function keymat, thereby destroying the confidentiality and data integrity of the communication. Different from the traditional intrusion detection technology, man-in-the-middle attack detection does not have obvious characteristics. The network data message attacked by man-in-the-middle is the same as that under normal conditions in terms of length, contracting frequency, and so on. IPSec packets are encrypted; it is impossible to identify whether there is an intermediary in the link through the communication content. This brings challenges to man-in-the-middle attack detection.Because the operation of Diffie-Hellman algorithm involves large number operation, the CPU time consumed cannot be masked by network jitter. Theoretically, when there is man-in-the-middle attack, on the client side, the round-trip time of the second pair of messages in IKE protocol will be significantly longer than that under normal circumstances. Therefore, this paper attempts to analyze the time consumed by each message interaction in the running process of IKE protocol to judge whether there are exceptions in the process of negotiation interaction.


## 3. The Problem Definition and Solution

### 3.1. MPRTT Definition

Protocol in C-S model, the client is the initiator, and the server is the responder. The message sequence of client denoted asMcs=mc1,mc2,⋯,mcn, while the message sequence of server denoted as Msc=ms1,ms2,⋯,msn.To start a new session, the client needs to do some initial operation including nonce generation, key generation, and cipher suite choice and then send out the first messagemc1 over the network channel. The server will respond a message ms1 after processing the client’s message.Definition 1.
A message pair means the initial messagemcn and its corresponding response message msn, donated as MPn=<msn,mcn>.Definition 2.
MPRTTn denotes the time cost of processing the n-th message pair, and Tcn is the timestamp that client send the message mcn, while Tsn is the timestamp that client receive the message msnfrom server. RTT is the round-trip time cost of a pair of messages. Then, MPRTTn=Tsn−Tcn. The measurement method of MPRTTn is shown in Figure 2.
TheMPRTTnrepresents the time spent by the client to process a pair of protocol messages, including fixed event delay and random event delay in the communication process. Fixed event delay is the sum of network channel transmission delay and protocol message processing delay in an ideal environment; random events include delays caused by events such as router queue cache, operating system cache, and operating system thread scheduling. In an ideal environment, the network channel transmission delay is recorded as COSTchan, the protocol message processing delay is recorded as COSTproto, and the delay caused by random events in the communication process is recorded as COSTjitter.Definition 3.
∆RTT is the difference between then-th message RTT and the RTT of the next message that means ∆RTTn=MPRTTn+1−MPRTTn. For a certain system with IPSec device, ∆RTT is a variable with jitters, and it is a normal distribution. The ∆RTT with MITM attack is different from a normal system. The MITM detection problem can be transformed to a ∆RTT abnormal detection problem. Our approach of abnormal detection is based on the confidence interval of normal distribution.Figure 2
The measurement of MPRTT.


### 3.2. ∆RTT Distribution

We studied the distribution of ∆RTT using statistic methods. The Grubbs method is to delete the outliners from the samples. There are three modes: left, right, and two-tailed. According to the experiments result, in two-tailed mode, the result is the best. Figure3 shows the result after deleting the outliner data with Grubbs method. With the shape of Figure 3 and the quantile-quantile plot shown in Figure 4, we can assume that the ∆RTT is according with normal distribution.Figure 3
The frequency distribution histogram of RTT.Figure 4
The quantile-quantile plot of RTT.


### 3.3. ∆RTT Abnormal Detection

The main idea of detection algorithm is anomaly detection based on normal distribution confidence interval. The experimental data includes two parts: training set and test set. The training set has only positive samples, that is, ∆RTT measurements under normal conditions. The anomaly detection algorithm is divided into three steps.(1)
Through the fitting of normal distribution, we can calculate the mean valueμ and standard deviation σ of the samples(2)
Under a certain significance levelα, calculate the confidence interval [C1, C2](3)
For the ∆RTT valueX measured in one IKE session, if C1≤X≤C1, the X is normal and there is no man-in-the-middle attack. Otherwise, the X will be considered as abnormal, and there may exists a man-in-the-middle attacker over the channel


## 3.1. MPRTT Definition

Protocol in C-S model, the client is the initiator, and the server is the responder. The message sequence of client denoted asMcs=mc1,mc2,⋯,mcn, while the message sequence of server denoted as Msc=ms1,ms2,⋯,msn.To start a new session, the client needs to do some initial operation including nonce generation, key generation, and cipher suite choice and then send out the first messagemc1 over the network channel. The server will respond a message ms1 after processing the client’s message.Definition 1.
A message pair means the initial messagemcn and its corresponding response message msn, donated as MPn=<msn,mcn>.Definition 2.
MPRTTn denotes the time cost of processing the n-th message pair, and Tcn is the timestamp that client send the message mcn, while Tsn is the timestamp that client receive the message msnfrom server. RTT is the round-trip time cost of a pair of messages. Then, MPRTTn=Tsn−Tcn. The measurement method of MPRTTn is shown in Figure 2.
TheMPRTTnrepresents the time spent by the client to process a pair of protocol messages, including fixed event delay and random event delay in the communication process. Fixed event delay is the sum of network channel transmission delay and protocol message processing delay in an ideal environment; random events include delays caused by events such as router queue cache, operating system cache, and operating system thread scheduling. In an ideal environment, the network channel transmission delay is recorded as COSTchan, the protocol message processing delay is recorded as COSTproto, and the delay caused by random events in the communication process is recorded as COSTjitter.Definition 3.
∆RTT is the difference between then-th message RTT and the RTT of the next message that means ∆RTTn=MPRTTn+1−MPRTTn. For a certain system with IPSec device, ∆RTT is a variable with jitters, and it is a normal distribution. The ∆RTT with MITM attack is different from a normal system. The MITM detection problem can be transformed to a ∆RTT abnormal detection problem. Our approach of abnormal detection is based on the confidence interval of normal distribution.Figure 2
The measurement of MPRTT.


## 3.2. ∆RTT Distribution

We studied the distribution of ∆RTT using statistic methods. The Grubbs method is to delete the outliners from the samples. There are three modes: left, right, and two-tailed. According to the experiments result, in two-tailed mode, the result is the best. Figure3 shows the result after deleting the outliner data with Grubbs method. With the shape of Figure 3 and the quantile-quantile plot shown in Figure 4, we can assume that the ∆RTT is according with normal distribution.Figure 3
The frequency distribution histogram of RTT.Figure 4
The quantile-quantile plot of RTT.


## 3.3. ∆RTT Abnormal Detection

The main idea of detection algorithm is anomaly detection based on normal distribution confidence interval. The experimental data includes two parts: training set and test set. The training set has only positive samples, that is, ∆RTT measurements under normal conditions. The anomaly detection algorithm is divided into three steps.(1)
Through the fitting of normal distribution, we can calculate the mean valueμ and standard deviation σ of the samples(2)
Under a certain significance levelα, calculate the confidence interval [C1, C2](3)
For the ∆RTT valueX measured in one IKE session, if C1≤X≤C1, the X is normal and there is no man-in-the-middle attack. Otherwise, the X will be considered as abnormal, and there may exists a man-in-the-middle attacker over the channel


## 4. Experiments

### 4.1. Experiments Environment

The network topology of the experimental environment is shown in Figure5. The IKE client runs on Windows 10 and macOS 10.15, respectively, using the built-in client software of the operating system. The IKE server runs on Alibaba cloud ECS, and the operating system is CentOS 7 2. The server software version is libreswan 1.39. The device MITMBox is the man-in-the-middle attacker, and the software is built based on several open-source software including DPDK, libgcrypt, and OpenSSL.Figure 5
The network topology of the Experiment.


### 4.2. Data Sets

We implemented the attack program according to the IKE man-in-the-middle attack method mentioned in the paper of G. Wang et al. [8]. We implemented a IKEv1 MITM device; the device can forward the packet using DPDK. The result shows that with a known preshared key, we can break the Diffie-Hellman process in IKEv1 session and calculate a pair of keys between the initiator and responder. Then, we can break the secrecy and the authentication of ESP; packets transported in IPSec tunnel can be decrypted to plaintext.We also implemented an automated tool to calculate the RTT of the IKE messages. The timestamp of a packet inlibpcap is recorded in pcap frame header. In libnids, we use nids_last_pcap_header to get the pcap header, and ts in pcap header structure is the timestamp of current message, which is being processed in the callback function. The structure is defined in nids.h and pcap.h. The timestamp of each message is stored in an array, one array for Mcs and one for Msc. The data measured for each IKE connection is taken as one sample, and the average value of three consecutive sampling results is taken as the RTT measurement result.The automate tools support different operating systems. For Windows, we useradialup to connect IKE server. For macOS, we use network-setup to connect an IKE connection. And on Linux, we use network-manager to connect the IKE server. All the connect task can be managed with script programming language, such as shell and powershell. MPRTT measuring method is based on deep packet inspection. There are several open-source tools to capture packet during IKE session on client side. tcpdump or dumpcap are command line tools, and they are easy to make a automate packet capture engine, with the help of bash on Linux, or powershell on windows. The tools save the message in pcap format.


### 4.3. Experiment Results

The metrics utilized in classification tasks are used to evaluate our technique in this study. When an attack class is used as a positive class, for example, four different types of classification results are displayed below.(i)
True Positive (TP). There exists MITM attack and the classifier marked this sample as abnormal(ii)
False Positive (FP). There is no MITM attack and the classifier marked this sample as abnormal(iii)
True Negative (TN). There is no MITM attack and the classifier marked this sample as normal(iv)
False Negative (FN). There exists MITM attack and the classifier marked this sample as normalWe calculate performance measures using the following formulas based on the classification results provided above.(5)Accuracy=TP+TNTP+TN+FP+FN,Precision=TPTP+FP,Recall=TPTP+FN,F1=2∗Precision∗RecallPrecision+Recall.In the experiment, we simulated 1000 normal sessions through an automated script. The measured data is used as the initial sample, and 10 training sets are obtained from the initial sample by random sampling without putting back. The sample size of each training set is 50. The 10 training sets are used to train the classifier, respectively. We measured the RTT of 5296 IKEv1 sessions as the testing set, including 4939 normal sessions and 357 sessions attacked by man-in-the-middle. The same test set is used to test the classification performance of 10 classifiers, to evaluate the stability of the algorithm. The significance levelα=0.01. The experimental results are shown in Table 1.Table 1
The evaluation metrics of classification.
RoundAccuracyRecallPrecisionF110.933510.92810.962720.936210.93110.964330.926110.92020.958440.809510.79410.885250.917510.91090.953460.922210.91590.956170.926110.92020.958480.937310.93220.964990.899910.89180.9428100.890710.88180.9372The experimental results show that the anomaly detection algorithm based on normal distribution confidence interval can identify all man-in-the-middle attacks. At the same time, some normal sessions are identified as abnormal, and the false positive rate is about 9%. The standard deviation of F1 is 0.018. It shows that the classification algorithm is stable. By comparing the experimental data, we find that the gap between normal data and abnormal data is very large. In the normal session, the mean value of ∆RTT is 1.083, while in the attacked session, the mean value of ∆RTT is 48.509; therefore, recall can reach 1.


## 4.1. Experiments Environment

The network topology of the experimental environment is shown in Figure5. The IKE client runs on Windows 10 and macOS 10.15, respectively, using the built-in client software of the operating system. The IKE server runs on Alibaba cloud ECS, and the operating system is CentOS 7 2. The server software version is libreswan 1.39. The device MITMBox is the man-in-the-middle attacker, and the software is built based on several open-source software including DPDK, libgcrypt, and OpenSSL.Figure 5
The network topology of the Experiment.


## 4.2. Data Sets

We implemented the attack program according to the IKE man-in-the-middle attack method mentioned in the paper of G. Wang et al. [8]. We implemented a IKEv1 MITM device; the device can forward the packet using DPDK. The result shows that with a known preshared key, we can break the Diffie-Hellman process in IKEv1 session and calculate a pair of keys between the initiator and responder. Then, we can break the secrecy and the authentication of ESP; packets transported in IPSec tunnel can be decrypted to plaintext.We also implemented an automated tool to calculate the RTT of the IKE messages. The timestamp of a packet inlibpcap is recorded in pcap frame header. In libnids, we use nids_last_pcap_header to get the pcap header, and ts in pcap header structure is the timestamp of current message, which is being processed in the callback function. The structure is defined in nids.h and pcap.h. The timestamp of each message is stored in an array, one array for Mcs and one for Msc. The data measured for each IKE connection is taken as one sample, and the average value of three consecutive sampling results is taken as the RTT measurement result.The automate tools support different operating systems. For Windows, we useradialup to connect IKE server. For macOS, we use network-setup to connect an IKE connection. And on Linux, we use network-manager to connect the IKE server. All the connect task can be managed with script programming language, such as shell and powershell. MPRTT measuring method is based on deep packet inspection. There are several open-source tools to capture packet during IKE session on client side. tcpdump or dumpcap are command line tools, and they are easy to make a automate packet capture engine, with the help of bash on Linux, or powershell on windows. The tools save the message in pcap format.


## 4.3. Experiment Results

The metrics utilized in classification tasks are used to evaluate our technique in this study. When an attack class is used as a positive class, for example, four different types of classification results are displayed below.(i)
True Positive (TP). There exists MITM attack and the classifier marked this sample as abnormal(ii)
False Positive (FP). There is no MITM attack and the classifier marked this sample as abnormal(iii)
True Negative (TN). There is no MITM attack and the classifier marked this sample as normal(iv)
False Negative (FN). There exists MITM attack and the classifier marked this sample as normalWe calculate performance measures using the following formulas based on the classification results provided above.(5)Accuracy=TP+TNTP+TN+FP+FN,Precision=TPTP+FP,Recall=TPTP+FN,F1=2∗Precision∗RecallPrecision+Recall.In the experiment, we simulated 1000 normal sessions through an automated script. The measured data is used as the initial sample, and 10 training sets are obtained from the initial sample by random sampling without putting back. The sample size of each training set is 50. The 10 training sets are used to train the classifier, respectively. We measured the RTT of 5296 IKEv1 sessions as the testing set, including 4939 normal sessions and 357 sessions attacked by man-in-the-middle. The same test set is used to test the classification performance of 10 classifiers, to evaluate the stability of the algorithm. The significance levelα=0.01. The experimental results are shown in Table 1.Table 1
The evaluation metrics of classification.
RoundAccuracyRecallPrecisionF110.933510.92810.962720.936210.93110.964330.926110.92020.958440.809510.79410.885250.917510.91090.953460.922210.91590.956170.926110.92020.958480.937310.93220.964990.899910.89180.9428100.890710.88180.9372The experimental results show that the anomaly detection algorithm based on normal distribution confidence interval can identify all man-in-the-middle attacks. At the same time, some normal sessions are identified as abnormal, and the false positive rate is about 9%. The standard deviation of F1 is 0.018. It shows that the classification algorithm is stable. By comparing the experimental data, we find that the gap between normal data and abnormal data is very large. In the normal session, the mean value of ∆RTT is 1.083, while in the attacked session, the mean value of ∆RTT is 48.509; therefore, recall can reach 1.


## 5. Case Study

The preshared key method is easy to operate and widely used. This type of authentication method is commonly used for VPN services for sale, and it is also used by many colleges and enterprises. Because users and network administrators do not have a deep understanding of the IPSec protocol, it is generally believed that the username and password used for login are required to be kept secret, and the preshared key does not need to be kept secret. Therefore, the entropy value of the preshared key of a large number of IPSec services is too low, and some are set as the website URL and some are set as the company name; passwords such as “123456” and “VPN” are also widely used. The built-in IPSec client of common operating system platforms is imperfect from the perspective of user experience. Usually, an administrator needs to write an instruction manual for the user. The user configures the IPSec client according to the manual. The general instruction manual will indicate PSK, and many instruction manuals are completely open without any access control, which leads to the leakage of PSK. By analyzing the interaction process of the IKE protocol, an attacker can conduct a man-in-the-middle attack on IPSec communication after mastering the PSK and can decrypt the data packet and tamper with the content of the data packet, destroying the confidentiality and authentication of the protocol.To identify the situation of PSK usage in IPSec service, we use Google to search the public PSK. For university, we use the keyword “vpn psk inurl:edu” and analyzed the top 50 results. After removing duplicate pages, inaccessible pages, and pages not related to VPN, we got 34 websites. Among these websites, there are 26 of them have public the PSK on the web pages. Within the 34 results of Google search, 76% PSK has been published on the website. In the 26 known PSK, 69% of them has less than 10 characters, 50% of the PSK contain “vpn,” 54% has some information associated with the organization, 46% of the PSK use uppercase or lowercase letters only, and 80% are in high risk of a dictionary attack.Judging from the statistics of search results, we can infer that most network administrators do not have a thorough understanding of the IPSec protocol, which caused PSK leakage due to unconscious behavior. The PSK setting is too simple, making PSK vulnerable to dictionary attacks. The above survey reflects that there are still many security risks in the use of IPSec, which makes MITM attacks against IPSec easier to implement. In the current environment, it may be difficult to force many administrators to change their long-term behavior habits or force all IPSec users to upgrade the protocol. Therefore, it is very important to study how to detect MITM attacks against IPSec.


## 6. Conclusion

Since the birth of the IKE protocol, scholars have proposed a lot of improvement methods for its security. Ray et al. [9] proposed an elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) based and certificate less IKE protocol to avoid denial-of-service (DoS) attack. Yin and Wang [10] proposed an application-aware IPsec policy system on the existing IPsec/IKE infrastructure, in which a socket monitor running in the application context reports the socket activities to the application policy engine. With the application of IPsec in IoT (Internet of Things) [11–15], ICS (industrial control system) [16, 17], and other fields, its security should be paid more attention.The related research work in this paper is a preliminary exploration of IPSec man-in-the-middle attack detection. It has been verified by experiments that during the IKE protocol interaction, the distribution of MPTTT conforms to the normal distribution, and when there is a man-in-the-middle attack during the protocol interaction, MPTTT will increase due to the addition of encryption calculations, which makes the distribution of the signal interval based on the normal distribution. Anomaly detection has become a method of IPSec man-in-the-middle attack detection. The experiments done in this paper are aimed at a specific DH-group scenario. In future research work, we will continue to study the changes in MPTTT in other scenarios. At the same time, because there is no public implementation method for IPSec man-in-the-middle attack, the research work of this paper can only be based on our own man-in-the-middle attack software. The software implementation method, hardware equipment, and optimization degree may have different effects on the experimental results. Therefore, improving the implementation method of man-in-the-middle attack equipment to make the equipment more universal is also one of our future research works.



---

*Source: 2605684-2022-06-14.xml*