# A Study of Transverse Momentum Distributions of Jets Produced inp-p, p-p-, d-Au, Au-Au, and Pb-Pb Collisions at High Energies

Authors: Hua-Rong Wei; Fu-Hu Liu
Journal: Advances in High Energy Physics
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

The transverse momentum distributions of jets produced inp-p, p-p-, d-Au, Au-Au, and Pb-Pb collisions at high energies with different selected conditions are analyzed by using a multisource thermal model. The multicomponent (mostly two-component) Erlang distribution used in our description is in good agreement with the experimental data measured by the STAR, D0, CDF II, ALICE, ATLAS, and CMS Collaborations. Related parameters are extracted from the transverse momentum distributions and some information on different interacting systems is obtained. In the two-component Erlang distribution, the first component has usually two or more sources which are contributed by strong scattering interactions between two quarks or more quarks and gluons, while the second component has mostly two sources which are contributed by harder head-on scattering between two quarks.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As a new state of matter, quark-gluon plasma (QGP) [1] is different from common plasmas. Generally, the QGP cannot be observed directly because its creation needs an extremely high temperature and density. In order to study the properties of the QGP and the mechanisms of parton interactions, a lot of experiments of high energy heavy ion collisions have been performed. Particularly, a high density and high temperature location is formed at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) to create the QGP and to produce multiple final-state particles. By investigating and analyzing these particles, one can obtain some information on the QGP. Hadron jets are one type of final-state particles. People study jets production process to learn the properties of the QGP and the mechanisms of parton interactions both in theories and in experiments [2–4].The transverse momenta of particles carry important information about the dynamics of particle productions and the evolution process of interacting system formed in nucleus-nucleus collisions [5]. The transverse momentum (pT) distributions of final-state particles reflect the state of the interacting system at the kinetic stage of freeze-out, when hadrons are no longer interaction and their momenta do not change [6]. Comparing to the low-pT hadrons which are originated from strong interactions among gluons and sea quarks, high-pT hadrons are produced due to harder head-on scattering between valent quarks. To analyze high-pT spectra of final-state particles is then important in studying the mechanisms of high energy collisions. In addition, the mean transverse momentum of particles, which served as a probe for the equation of state of the hadronic matter [7], can partly reflect the effective temperature of interacting system and the transverse excitation degree of emission source in high energy collisions [8].Due to the hard-scattering of incident partons, partonic jets (including quark and gluon jets) materialize very early during the collisions, which result in plenty of outgoing high-pT partons. Soon afterwards, a parton fragments into a leading hadron, a large number of which gather into a cone of hadronic jets which are detected by various detectors such as STAR, D0, CDF II, ALICE, ATLAS, and CMS [9–36]. We are interested in analyzing the transverse momentum distributions of various jets because they can reflect some information of early collisions of partons.In this paper, we use the multicomponent (mostly two-component) Erlang distribution to describe the transverse momentum distributions of jets produced inp-p, p-p¯, d-Au, Au-Au, and Pb-Pb collisions at high energies, with the framework of a multisource thermal model [37–39]. The quoted data are at five energies, 0.2, 1.96, 2.76, 7, and 8 TeV per nucleon pair [9–36], and were selected in different detection channels according to different conditions of cone radius, integrated luminosity, pseudorapidity (rapidity) range, and centrality interval. The calculations are performed by using the Monte Carlo method.


## 2. The Model and Formulism

According to the multisource thermal model [37–39], we assume that many emission sources are formed in high energy collisions. These emission sources can be separated into a few groups due to different interacting mechanisms in the collisions and different event samples in experimental measurements. Each emission source in the same group has the same transverse excitation degree, and the group is assumed to stay at a local equilibrium state. The total result of a multigroup emission process contributes to the final distribution.The transverse momentum distribution generated in thermodynamic system obeys an exponential distribution, which is the contribution of one emission source. We have(1)fijptij=1ptijexp⁡⁡-ptijptij,where ptij is the transverse momentum contributed by the ith source in the jth group and 〈ptij〉 is the mean value of different ptij. The folding result of mj sources in a given (the jth) group is an Erlang distribution; that is,(2)fjpT=pTmj-1mj-1!ptijmjexp⁡⁡-pTptij,where pT is the transverse momentum contributed by the mj sources. If the number of groups is l, the total contribution is the multicomponent Erlang distribution expressed as(3)fpT=∑j=1lkjfjpT,where kj is the weight contributed by the jth group, which obeys the normalization ∑‍kj=1. To describe transverse excitation degree of emission source in the present work, we define a new effective temperature parameter:(4)T≡∑j=1lkjptij,which uses the inverse slope parameter 〈ptij〉.We will see from the following section thatpT distributions of jets analyzed in the present work can be mostly fitted by the two-component Erlang distribution. Generally, the first component corresponds to strong scattering interactions where two quarks or more quarks and gluons take part in the process, and the second one corresponds to harder head-on scattering where two quarks take part in the process. All the calculations on pT distributions are performed by using the Monte Carlo method. For the first component, we have(5)pT=-pti1∑i=1m1ln⁡⁡Ri,and, for the second component, we have(6)pT=-pti2∑i=1m2ln⁡⁡Ri,where Ri denote random numbers in [0,1]. The statistics based on weights k1 and k2 (=1-k1) will give pT distributions. In the case of using the three- or multicomponent Erlang distribution, the calculation process of the Monte Carlo method is similar.We would like to point out that the new effective temperature parameter defined in (4) is not the real temperature of jets production source but the mean transverse momentum extracted from the model or experimental data. The real temperature of jets production source should be a reflection of purely thermal motion in the source. The effect of flow or blast wave should be excluded in the extraction of source temperature. Generally, the effective temperature parameter is extracted from the transverse momentum distribution. It includes thermal motion and flow effect and should be greater than the source temperature. As the mean transverse momentum, the new effective temperature parameter is independent of models.


## 3. Comparison with Experimental Data

Figure1 presents pT distributions of high tower (HT) trigger jets in p-p collision (a), HT trigger jets in 0–20% central Au-Au collisions (b), jets from d-Au collisions (c), and uncorrected jets in p-p collision (d) at center-of-mass energy sNN=0.2 TeV, where for p-p collision sNN can be simplified as s. The symbols represent the experimental data of the STAR Collaboration [9–11]. In Figures 1(a) and 1(b), jet events were selected by an online HT trigger using the anti-kT algorithm [12] with a cone radius R=0.4, pseudorapidity range |η|<0.6, and pT>2.0 GeV/c. The displayed uncertainty of the data is only systematic uncertainty. The data from Figure 1(c) were recorded during RHIC run 8 (2007-2008) with R=0.4 and |η|<0.55. The error bars represent systematic uncertainty and statistical uncertainty. Raw jets in Figure 1(d) were obtained under the condition of R=0.7, -0.7<η<0.9, and jets pT>5.0 GeV/c. In the figure, some error bars are not visible due to their small values. In this case we regard the marker size as the errors in the calculation. The curves are our results calculated with the two-component Erlang distribution in the framework of the multisource thermal model by using the Monte Carlo method. The values of free parameters, defined effective temperature parameter T, and χ2 per degree of freedom (χ2/dof) or χ2 are shown in Table 1, where χ2 is used in the case of the number of data points being less than 6 which is the number of free parameters and normalization constants. One can see that the multisource thermal model describes the experimental data of the considered jets in p-p, d-Au, and Au-Au collisions at sNN=0.2 TeV. The transverse momentum distributions of mentioned jets are shown to obey the two-component Erlang distribution. For Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c), all the source numbers of the second groups are 2 and the values of mean excitation degree (defined effective temperature parameter) T extracted from the spectra are close to each other. For the raw jets in Figure 1(d), the background interference leads to the number of emission sources to increase and the mean excitation degree to decrease.Table 1
Values of free parameters, definedT, and χ2/dof (χ2) corresponding to the curves in the figures, where χ2 is given in bracket if the number of data points is less than 6 which is the number of free parameters and normalization constants. The errors of mj are estimated to be 0.
Figure, type
m
1
p
t
i
1 (GeV/c)
k
1
m
2
p
t
i
2 (GeV/c)
T (GeV)
χ
2/dof (χ2)
Figure1(a)
2
1.70 ± 0.20
0.860 ± 0.030
2
3.25 ± 0.10
1.917 ± 0.205
0.328
Figure1(b)
2
1.60 ± 0.20
0.900 ± 0.030
2
3.55 ± 0.20
1.795 ± 0.215
0.189
Figure1(c)
2
1.82 ± 0.07
0.994 ± 0.002
2
5.00 ± 0.50
1.839 ± 0.070
0.038
Figure1(d)
11
1.25 ± 0.05
0.890 ± 0.020
8
2.47 ± 0.05
1.384 ± 0.071
(0.084)
Figure2(a)
2
8.80 ± 0.80
0.830 ± 0.030
2
22.80 ± 1.50
11.180 ± 1.022
0.132
Figure2(b)
2
8.80 ± 0.70
0.840 ± 0.030
2
23.00 ± 1.50
11.072 ± 0.974
0.191
Figure2(c)
2
10.20 ± 1.00
0.900 ± 0.030
2
26.60 ± 2.00
11.840 ± 1.257
0.393
Figure2(d)
2
12.00 ± 8.00
0.996 ± 0.001
2
34.00 ± 0.50
12.088 ± 7.968
0.186
Figure3(a)
2
5.20 ± 0.04
0.900 ± 0.020
2
11.20 ± 0.40
5.800 ± 0.253
0.044
Figure3(b)
2
5.50 ± 0.03
0.950 ± 0.010
2
12.70 ± 0.40
5.860 ± 0.143
0.097
Figure3(c)
2
5.50 ± 0.02
0.950 ± 0.010
2
12.80 ± 0.50
5.865 ± 0.143
0.011
Figure3(d)
2
5.60 ± 0.03
0.960 ± 0.010
2
12.70 ± 0.80
5.884 ± 0.145
0.054
Figure4(a), 1st
2
13.00 ± 2.00
0.620 ± 0.080
2
40.00 ± 5.00
23.260 ± 4.058
0.100
Figure4(a), 2nd
2
11.50 ± 1.00
0.850 ± 0.050
2
28.00 ± 5.00
13.975 ± 1.891
0.185
Figure4(b), lepton
2
28.00 ± 2.00
0.907 ± 0.010
2
100.00 ± 30.00
30.160 ± 2.377
0.019
Figure4(b), dilepton
2
25.00 ± 2.00
0.850 ± 0.050
2
47.00 ± 5.00
28.300 ± 3.246
0.055
Figure4(c), inclusive jets
2
42.00 ± 2.00
0.998 ± 0.001
2
115.00 ± 10.00
42.164 ± 2.000
0.619
Figure4(c), split jets
2
34.00 ± 3.00
0.994 ± 0.003
2
87.00 ± 10.00
34.318 ± 2.996
3.769
Figure4(d), lepton
2
21.90 ± 2.00
0.890 ± 0.090
2
40.50 ± 10.00
23.946 ± 4.642
0.095
Figure4(d), dilepton
2
22.50 ± 2.00
0.880 ± 0.100
2
47.00 ± 10.00
25.440 ± 5.629
0.392
Figure5(a)
2
13.50 ± 1.00
0.910 ± 0.050
2
50.00 ± 20.00
16.785 ± 3.282
0.303
Figure5(b)
2
11.20 ± 1.00
0.820 ± 0.100
2
28.00 ± 10.00
14.224 ± 3.606
0.312
Figure5(c)
2
18.00 ± 2.00
0.810 ± 0.100
2
29.00 ± 5.00
20.090 ± 3.896
0.067
Figure6(a)
4
12.70 ± 0.90
0.900 ± 0.020
2
44.00 ± 4.00
15.830 ± 1.286
0.187
Figure6(b)
6
11.50 ± 1.00
0.710 ± 0.100
2
80.00 ± 30.00
31.365 ± 11.896
0.661
Figure6(c)
4
18.80 ± 1.00
0.960 ± 0.010
2
92.00 ± 10.00
21.728 ± 1.401
0.181
Figure6(d)
5
15.20 ± 0.80
0.770 ± 0.080
2
42.00 ± 5.00
21.364 ± 3.804
0.173
Figure7, leading
7
14.00 ± 1.00
0.610 ± 0.050
2
58.00 ± 2.00
31.160 ± 3.143
(0.069)
Figure7, 2nd
7
9.60 ± 0.08
0.740 ± 0.050
2
42.00 ± 2.00
18.024 ± 2.217
(0.367)
Figure7, 3rd
7
6.10 ± 0.50
0.620 ± 0.050
2
23.00 ± 1.00
12.522 ± 1.287
(0.434)
Figure7, 4th
7
4.70 ± 1.00
0.780 ± 0.050
2
18.80 ± 1.50
7.802 ± 1.287
(0.281)
Figure7, 5th
7
4.00 ± 0.70
0.820 ± 0.040
2
15.00 ± 1.50
5.980 ± 0.888
(0.128)
Figure8(a)
5
22.00 ± 2.00
0.820 ± 0.030
2
82.00 ± 4.00
32.800 ± 3.114
0.177
Figure8(b)
6
17.60 ± 1.00
0.880 ± 0.030
2
79.00 ± 5.00
24.968 ± 2.651
0.619
Figure8(c)
5
23.00 ± 3.00
0.580 ± 0.050
2
81.00 ± 5.00
47.360 ± 5.016
0.408
Figure8(d)
6
18.00 ± 1.00
0.820 ± 0.040
2
100.00 ± 10.00
32.760 ± 4.520
0.799
Figure9(a)
4
24.90 ± 2.00
0.880 ± 0.040
2
89.00 ± 7.00
32.592 ± 4.180
1.022
Figure9(b)
6
36.50 ± 1.00
0.850 ± 0.030
2
132.00 ± 8.00
50.825 ± 4.364
0.112
Figure9(c)
6
18.50 ± 1.00
0.880 ± 0.050
2
120.00 ± 50.00
30.680 ± 8.581
0.427
Figure9(d)
6
19.10 ± 1.00
0.930 ± 0.030
2
160.00 ± 50.00
28.963 ± 6.040
0.453
Figure9(e)
7
16.00 ± 1.00
0.870 ± 0.050
2
109.00 ± 15.00
28.090 ± 5.908
0.815
Figure9(f)
9
11.60 ± 1.00
0.750 ± 0.050
2
180.00 ± 100.00
53.700 ± 26.588
0.731
Figure10(a)
9
11.00 ± 0.70
0.700 ± 0.070
4
41.00 ± 3.00
20.000 ± 3.143
0.196
Figure10(b)
9
10.90 ± 0.70
0.710 ± 0.050
4
40.00 ± 2.00
19.339 ± 2.209
0.138
Figure10(c)
5
15.20 ± 2.00
0.540 ± 0.100
2
69.00 ± 10.00
39.948 ± 8.500
0.137
Figure10(d)
5
5.80 ± 1.00
0.580 ± 0.100
2
26.00 ± 5.00
14.284 ± 3.441
0.298
Figure10(e)
2
25.30 ± 2.00
0.830 ± 0.030
2
61.00 ± 3.00
31.369 ± 2.634
0.053
Figure10(f)
2
12.50 ± 0.50
0.970 ± 0.003
2
47.00 ± 2.00
12.877 ± 0.507
0.295
Figure11(a)
4
45.80 ± 4.00
0.969 ± 0.010
2
118.00 ± 5.00
48.038 ± 4.080
0.392
Figure11(b)
6
3.00 ± 0.10
0.760 ± 0.020
2
19.00 ± 1.00
6.840 ± 0.460
0.062Figure 1
Transverse momentum spectra of HT trigger jets inp-p collision (a), HT trigger jets in 0–20% central Au-Au collisions (b), jets from d-Au collisions (c), and uncorrected jets in p-p collision (d) at sNN=0.2 TeV. The symbols represent the experimental data of the STAR Collaboration [9–11] and the curves are our results calculated by using the two-component Erlang distribution in the framework of the multisource thermal model. All the calculations are performed by the Monte Carlo method.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure2 shows pT spectra of the leading jets (a)–(c) and all jets (d) that satisfy the event selection described below, produced in p-p¯ collision at s=1.96 TeV. The symbols in (a) and (b) represent the experimental data collected by the D0 Collaboration in run II with an integrated luminosity of 9.7 fb−1 [13], while (c) represents the same as (a) and (b) but for an integrated luminosity of 3.7 fb−1 [14], and (d) represents the experimental data collected by the CDF II Collaboration with a cone size of R=0.7, pseudorapidity range of 0.1<|η|<0.7, as well as an integrated luminosity of 6 fb−1 [15]. The data come from the Z bosons decaying to pairs of leptons ee (a) or μμ (b). The jets in Figure 2(c) are required to satisfy pT>20 GeV/c and rapidity |y|<3.2 with a cone radius R=0.5. The error bars in (a) and (b) represent the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties, and those in (c) and (d) represent statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. In the figure, for the points with invisible error bars, we measure the marker size as the errors used in the calculation. The curves are our results calculated with the two-component Erlang distribution. The values of free parameters, defined T, and χ2/dof in the calculation are given in Table 1. One can see that the two-component Erlang distribution describes well the experimental data of the jets produced in p-p¯ collision at s=1.96 TeV. For the four cases, all the source numbers of the second groups are 2, and the values of T extracted from the spectra are approximately the same.Figure 2
Transverse momentum spectra for the leading jets (a)–(c) and all the jet candidates (d) produced inp-p¯ collision at s=1.96 TeV. The symbols in Figures 2(a)–2(c) and Figure 2(d) represent the experimental data of the D0 Collaboration [13, 14] and the CDF II Collaboration [15], respectively. The curves are our results calculated by using the two-component Erlang distribution.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)In Figure3, we give charged jet pT spectra produced in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV in different centrality intervals of 0–10% (a), 10–30% (b), 30–50% (c), and 50–80% (d). The experimental data represented by the symbols were measured with a cone radius R=0.2, |η|<0.5, anti-kT jet algorithm [12], charged track pT>0.15 GeV/c, and leading charged track pT>10 GeV/c by the ALICE Collaboration [16]. The error bars include the total uncertainty. The curves are our fitted results with the two-component Erlang distribution. The values of free parameters, defined T, and χ2/dof in the calculation are displayed in Table 1. Once more, the two-component Erlang distribution describes well the experimental data of the charged jets produced in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV with different centrality intervals. The fitted source numbers of the second groups are also 2, and the effective temperature parameter T extracted from the spectra slightly increases with increase of the centrality percentage C, or T has no obvious change with increase of C in the error range. The figure display of the dependence of T on C will be discussed in the last part of this section.Figure 3
Charged jetpT spectra produced in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV in different centrality intervals of 0–10% (a), 10–30% (b), 30–50% (c), and 50–80% (d). The symbols represent the experimental data of the ALICE Collaboration [16] and the curves are our results calculated by using the two-component Erlang distribution.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure4 displays jet pT spectra produced in p-p collision at s=7 TeV for different conditions. The symbols in (a) and (b) represent the experimental data recorded by the CMS Collaboration [17], and those in (c) and (d) represent the ATLAS Collaboration [18, 19]. The first [the black squares in Figure 4(a)] and the second leading jets [the red circles in Figure 4(a)], as well as the lepton + jets channel jets with pT>35 GeV/c [the black squares in Figure 4(b)] and the dilepton channel jets with pT>30 GeV/c [the red circles in Figure 4(b)], were selected corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 5.0 fb−1. In Figure 4(c), the selected data for the Cambridge-Aachen algorithm jet events where the number of reconstructed primary vertices (NPV) composed of at least five tracks is exactly one corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2 pb−1, R=1.2, and |y|<2. The jets shown by the red circles in Figure 4(c) were split and filtered from those jets with pT>200 GeV/c represented by the black squares in the same panel. The data for b-quark jets (b-jets) displayed in Figure 4(d) were collected with an integrated luminosity of 1.8 fb−1 for the single-lepton channels by the black squares and for the dilepton channels by the red circles. The error bars on the data points indicate the statistical uncertainty in Figures 4(a)–4(c) and systematic uncertainty in Figure 4(d). For some data points in which the error bars are invisible in the figure, we use the marker size instead of the real error values in our calculation. The curves are our fitted results by the two-component Erlang distribution. The relevant parameter values with χ2/dof in the calculation are presented in Table 1. The two-component Erlang distribution with m2=2 provides a good description on the data. As can be seen, the value of T extracted from the 1st leading jet spectra is significantly larger than that extracted from the 2nd one. In the error range, T extracted from the single-lepton channel jet spectra is approximately in agreement with that from the dilepton one.Figure 4
JetpT spectra produced in p-p collision at s=7 TeV for different situations shown in the panels and text. The symbols shown in Figures 4(a)-4(b) and Figures 4(c)-4(d) represent the experimental data of the CMS Collaboration [17] and the ATLAS Collaboration [18, 19], respectively. The curves are our modelling results.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The transverse momentum distributions for the subleadingb-jets after the Z+2b-jets selection corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.0 fb−1, the soft-muon tagging (SMT) jets for opposite-sign and same-sign (OS-SS) events in W+1,2 jets samples in electron channels with an integrated luminosity of 4.6 fb−1, and the light-quark jets produced in the same condition as that in Figure 4(d) in p-p collision at s=7 TeV are shown in Figures 5(a)–5(c), respectively. The experimental data represented by the symbols were recorded by the CMS Collaboration [20] and the ATLAS Collaboration [19, 21]. The error bars indicate the total uncertainty. In Figure 5(c), the error bars of the points in high-pT area present the marker size of the points from [19], in which the linear coordinate is used. The curves are our results calculated by the two-component Erlang distribution. The parameter values and the defined T in the calculation are shown in Table 1 with values of χ2/dof. One can see that the experimental data are in good agreement with the two-component Erlang distribution with m2=2. In the error range, the three effective temperatures extracted from the three distributions are approximately equal to each other.Figure 5
Transverse momentum spectra for the subleadingb-jets (a), the SMT jets (b), and the light-quark jets (c) produced in p-p collision at s=7 TeV. The symbols represent the experimental data of the CMS Collaboration [20] and the ATLAS Collaboration [19, 21]. The curves are our modelling results.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure6 shows some other jet pT distributions in p-p collision at s=7 TeV. The symbols in (a)–(d) represent the experimental data which were recorded with the ATLAS detector corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 37 pb−1 [22], the CMS detector corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.0 fb−1 for the leading b-tagged jets in the Z+2b-jets sample [20], the ATLAS detector corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.6 fb−1 for the leading b-tagged jets in e + jets channels [23], and the ATLAS detector corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.6 fb−1 for the leading b-tagged jets in μ + jets channels [23], respectively. The statistical or systematic uncertainties are included in the error bars. For some data points with no error bars, we use the marker size as their errors in the calculation. The Monte Carlo results calculated by using the two-component Erlang distribution are indicated by the curves, and the corresponding parameters, defined T, and χ2/dof are listed in Table 1. The fitting distributions are in agreement with the experimental data. All the source numbers of the second components are 2. The values of T extracted from the leading jets in Figures 6(b)–6(d) are larger than that extracted from inclusive jets in Figure 6(a). In addition, for the leading b-tagged jets, T from e + jets channels is in agreement with that from μ + jets channels within uncertainties.Figure 6
Some other jetpT spectra in p-p collision at s=7 TeV for different situations shown in the panels and text. The symbols shown in Figures 6(a), 6(b), and 6(c)-6(d) represent the experimental data of the ATLAS [22], CMS [20], and ATLAS Collaborations [23], respectively. The curves are our modelling results.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The reconstructed jetpT spectra for the leading (squares), 2nd (circles), 3rd (triangles), 4th (stars), and 5th order jets (diamonds) in the electron (e + jets) channels produced in p-p collision at s=7 TeV are indicated in Figure 7. The symbols represent the experimental data collected by the ATLAS Collaboration corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.6 fb−1 and a radius parameter of 0.4 within the pseudorapidity range |η|<2.5 using anti-kT jet algorithm [12] for pT>25 GeV/c jets [24]. In the figure, all the data have invisible error bars (statistical uncertainty only), so we measure the marker size as the errors used in the calculation. The curves are our fitted results with the two-component Erlang distribution, and the related parameter values with χ2 are given in Table 1. From the figure one can see that the fitted results are in agreement with the observed jet pT distributions. For different jet orders, we have m1=7 and m2=2. The value of T decreases with increase of the jet order O. The figure display of the dependence of T on O will be discussed in the last part of this section.Figure 7
The transverse momentum spectra for the leading,2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th order jets in the electron (e + jets) channels produced in p-p collision at s=7 TeV. The symbols represent the experimental data of the ATLAS Collaboration [24] and the curves are our modelling results.In Figure8, the leading jet pT distributions in (a) the 4-jet tt¯, (b) preselection, (c) W boson + jets, and (d) 5-jet tt¯ with an integrated luminosity of 4.7 fb−1 in p-p collision at s=7 TeV are shown. The symbols represent the experimental data recorded by the ATLAS Collaboration [25]. The error bars indicate the total uncertainty. The curves indicate the fitted results by the two-component Erlang distribution, and the corresponding values of free parameters, defined T, and χ2/dof are listed in Table 1. One can see that the two-component Erlang distribution with m2=2 describes the data of the leading jet pT spectra, and the extracted effective temperature parameters have a smaller difference.Figure 8
The leading jetpT distributions in (a) the 4-jet tt¯, (b) preselection, (c) W boson + jets, and (d) 5-jet tt¯ with an integrated luminosity of 4.7 fb−1 in p-p collision at s=7 TeV. The symbols represent the experimental data of the ATLAS Collaboration [25] and the curves are our modelling results.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figures9(a) and 9(b) display pT distributions of the leading and fat jets in p-p collision at s=7 TeV, respectively, where the results are in the lepton plus jets channels using an integrated luminosity of 2.05 fb−1. Figures 9(c)–9(f) give pT distributions of the leading jets in the same collision, and the corresponding integrated luminosity and lepton plus jets channels are shown in the panels. The symbols represent the experimental data of the ATLAS Collaboration [26–30]. The error bars indicate the experimental uncertainty. Our calculated results by using the two-component Erlang distribution are presented by the curves in the figure. The values of free parameters, defined T, and χ2/dof are given in Table 1. One can see that the mentioned pT spectra for the leading and fat jets are fitted by the two-component Erlang distribution with m2=2 and relatively larger T. In addition, in the error range, T extracted from the jet spectra in e + jets channels is in agreement with that in μ + jets channels.Figure 9
Transverse momentum distributions of the leading and fat jets produced inp-p collision at s=7 TeV with different channels and integrated luminosities shown in the panels and text. The symbols represent the experimental data of the ATLAS Collaboration [26–30] and the curves are our modelling results.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)The transverse momentum distributions of the leading jets produced inp-p collision at s=8 TeV with an integrated luminosity of 14.3 fb−1 in the e + jets and an integrated luminosity of 14.2 fb−1 in the μ + jets, after the resolved selection, are shown in Figures 10(a) and 10(b), respectively. The experimental data (the squares) were recorded by the ATLAS Collaboration [31]. Meanwhile, the data (the squares) of the leading light jet pT distribution and the second leading light jet pT distribution from p-p collision at s=8 TeV corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 19.5 fb−1 measured by the CMS Collaboration [32] are presented in Figures 10(c) and 10(d), respectively. Moreover, the leading jet pT distribution and the subleading jet pT distribution in the dijet system using p-p collision at s=8 TeV with an integrated luminosity of 20.3 fb−1 are displayed in Figures 10(e) and 10(f), respectively, where the squares represent the data of the ATLAS Collaboration [33]. In the figure, the error bars reflect the statistical uncertainty, and the curves are our results calculated by using the two-component Erlang distribution. The relevant parameter values with χ2/dof in our calculation are presented in Table 1. From the figure, one can see that the modelling results are in agreement with the data. Comparing with the leading jet spectra, the defined T extracted from the subleading jet spectra exhibits a quick decrease. The defined T extracted from the light jet spectra shows relatively a little larger value than that from the nontagged jets spectra, or the two situations are approximately the same in the error range. Moreover, the defined T corresponding to the leading jets from e + jets and μ + jets channels in Figures 10(a) and 10(b) is nearly the same.Figure 10
Transverse momentum distributions of different types of jets produced inp-p collision at s=8 TeV with different selected conditions shown in the panels and text. The symbols shown in Figures 10(a)-10(b), 10(c)-10(d), and 10(e)-10(f) represent the experimental data of the ATLAS [31], CMS [32], and ATLAS Collaborations [33], respectively. The curves are our modelling results.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)The inclusive jetpT distributions and the large-R jet pT distribution produced in p-p collision at s=8 TeV are presented in Figure 11. The data (squares) in Figure 11(a) were collected with the CMS detector corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 10.7 fb−1 from a high-level trigger that accepted events containing at least one jet with pT>320 GeV/c [34]. The data (squares) in Figure 11(b) for Z→μμ events were selected from the full 2012 run and amounted to a total integrated luminosity of 19.8 fb−1 [35]. The data (squares) in Figure 11(c) were collected by the ATLAS Collaboration corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 20 fb−1 with an uncertainty of 2.8% [36]. In the figure, the curves indicate our fitted results. One can see that the modelling results are in good agreement with the experimental data. The related parameter values for Figures 11(a) and 11(b) are given in Table 1, where the number of components is two and the source numbers of the second components are m2=2. For Figure 11(c), we have to use the three-component Erlang distribution with m1=29, pti1=(6.65±0.60) GeV/c, k1=0.396±0.036, m2=14, pti2=(19.50±1.00) GeV/c, k2=0.204±0.036, m3=2, pti3=(111.00±10.00) GeV/c, T=51.011±11.853 GeV, and χ2/dof = 0.377.Figure 11
(a) and (b) Inclusive jetpT spectra and (c) the large-R jet pT spectrum produced in p-p collision at s=8 TeV. The symbols shown in Figures 11(a)-11(b) and 11(c) represent the experimental data of the CMS [34, 35] and ATLAS Collaborations [36], respectively. The curves are our modelling results, where the two-component Erlang distribution is used for Figures 11(a) and 11(b), and the three-component Erlang distribution is used for Figure 11(c).
(a)
(b)
(c)To see clearly the dependence of the effective temperature parameterT on the centrality percentage C in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV, we present the relation T-C in Figure 12(a). The circles represent the effective temperature values obtained from Figure 3 and listed in Table 1, and the curve is our fitted result by an exponential function of(7)T=-0.125±0.020exp⁡⁡-C10.500±3.000+5.878±0.010with χ2/dof = 0.0002, where T is in the units of GeV and C is in %. One can see that T slightly increases with increase of C, and a saturation effect quickly appears in semicentral collisions, or T has no obvious change in the error range with increase of C. In addition, to see clearly the dependence of the effective temperature parameter T on the jet order O in p-p collision at s=7 TeV, we present the relation T-O in Figure 12(b). The circles represent the effective temperature values obtained from Figure 7 and listed in Table 1, and the curve is our fitted result by an exponential function of(8)T=54.30±3.00exp⁡⁡-O1.43±0.10+4.55±1.00with χ2 = 0.129, where T is in the units of GeV. One can see that T decreases with increase of O.Figure 12
Dependences of defined effective temperature parameterT on centrality percentage C in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV (a) and on jet order O in p-p collision at s=7 TeV (b). The symbols represent T values obtained from Figures 3 and 7 (listed in Table 1), respectively, and the curves are our fitted results which are presented in (7) and (8), respectively.
(a)
(b)The dependences of the effective temperature parameterT on other factors such as l and di-l channels (a), μ(μμ) and e(ee) channels (b), leading and subleading jets (c), and size of interacting system (d) are displayed in Figure 13, where the symbols represent the effective temperature values obtained from the above figures and listed in Table 1. One can see that a high center-of-mass energy results in a high effective temperature, different lepton channels show approximately the same effective temperature in the error range, and the leading jets correspond to a high effective temperature comparing with the subleading jets. At the same time, T slightly decreases with increase of the size of interacting system, or T is approximately not related to the size in the error range. The former case can be explained by the influence of jet quenching effect (quick energy loss) which exists in Au-Au collisions and does not exist in p-p collision.Figure 13
Dependences ofT on l and di-l channels (a), μ(μμ) and e(ee) channels (b), leading and subleading jets (c), and size of interacting system (d). The symbols represent T values obtained from related figures and listed in Table 1.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 4. Conclusions

From the above discussions, we obtain following conclusions.(a) The transverse momentum distributions, of various jets produced inp-p, p-p¯, d-Au, Au-Au, and Pb-Pb collisions over an energy range from 0.2 to 8 TeV in different additional selection conditions, are described by using the multicomponent Erlang distribution in the framework of the multisource thermal model which reflects the reaction types in interacting system and multiple temperatures emission. The calculated results are in good agreement with the experimental data measured by the STAR, D0, CDF II, ALICE, ATLAS, and CMS Collaborations.(b) Except for one group data in Figure11(c) which is described by the three-component Erlang distribution, the data of pT spectra for mentioned jets are fitted by the two-component Erlang distribution. The source numbers of the first components are greater than or equal to 2, while the source numbers of the second components are mostly 2. In pT distribution, the first component in charge of low-pT jets indicates strong scattering interactions between two quarks or among more quarks and gluons and accounted for a larger proportion, and the second component for high-pT region means harder head-on scattering between two quarks.(c) The effective temperature parameterT is higher, which means that the transverse excitation of emission source is very violent. From our study, T depends on the center-of-mass energy, system size, centrality interval, jet type, jet order, channel of detection system, and origination. Generally, T increases with increase of center-of-mass energy, which renders the fact that the larger the center-of-mass energy is, the more violent the transverse excitation of the interacting system is. Besides, at the same center-of-mass energy, there is a slightly negative correlation between T and the system size, or T is approximately independent of the size in the error range. The former case reflects that, in relatively complex collision system, there is a jet quenching effect (quick energy loss) in the case of high energy quark and gluon jets penetrating through the dense deconfined matter.(d) FrompT distributions of charged jets produced in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV with different centrality intervals analyzed by using the two-component Erlang distribution, we know that T slightly increases with increase of the centrality percentage C and quickly saturates in semicentral collisions, or T has no obvious change in the error range with increase of C. In addition, as expected, the extracted effective temperature from the reconstructed jets pT spectra produced in electron channels in p-p collisions at s=7 TeV decreases with increase of the jet order from the 1st to 5th.(e) At the same energy, the effective temperature extracted from the leading jets is much higher than that from the subleading jets. This is a natural result because the leading jets are produced through more violent scattering. The effective temperature extracted from tagged jets (such as light-quark jets andb-quark jets) seems to be higher than that from nontagged jets, which reveals that the hadron jets originated from quark jets carry more energy and the leading jets primarily originate from quark jets. The effective temperatures extracted from different lepton and dilepton channel jets are approximately the same in the error range, which reflects the common property in these jets.



---

*Source: 263135-2015-05-19.xml*