# Clinical Trials in Cardiac Arrest and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Lessons from the Past and Ideas for the Future

Authors: Jennifer A. Frontera
Journal: Stroke Research and Treatment
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Introduction. Elevated intracranial pressure that occurs at the time of cerebral aneurysm rupture can lead to inadequate cerebral blood flow, which may mimic the brain injury cascade that occurs after cardiac arrest. Insights from clinical trials in cardiac arrest may provide direction for future early brain injury research after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Methods. A search of PubMed from 1980 to 2012 and clinicaltrials.gov was conducted to identify published and ongoing randomized clinical trials in aneurysmal SAH and cardiac arrest patients. Only English, adult, human studies with primary or secondary mortality or neurological outcomes were included. Results. A total of 142 trials (82 SAH, 60 cardiac arrest) met the review criteria (103 published, 39 ongoing). The majority of both published and ongoing SAH trials focus on delayed secondary insults after SAH (70%), while 100% of cardiac arrest trials tested interventions within the first few hours of ictus. No SAH trials addressing treatment of early brain injury were identified. Twenty-nine percent of SAH and 13% of cardiac arrest trials showed outcome benefit, though there is no overlap mechanistically. Conclusions. Clinical trials in SAH assessing acute brain injury are warranted and successful interventions identified by the cardiac arrest literature may be reasonable targets of the study.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

For decades, research efforts in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) have focused on vasospasm and delayed ischemic neurological deficits. However, brain injury at the time of aneurysm rupture is a significant predictor of functional outcome. Indeed, poor admission neurological status (Hunt-Hess or World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Score), which reflects acute brain injury, is a larger contributor to death or severe disability than delayed cerebral ischemia [1, 2]. However, the mechanism of early brain injury after aneurysm rupture remains elusive and no current therapies are available.One possible mechanism of acute injury was described in a small case series of 6 patients with observed recurrent aneurysm rupture either during transcranial Doppler (TCD) or during craniotomy with open skull but intact dura. The investigators report a spike in intracranial pressure (ICP) that developed over 1 minute and then declined over several minutes. This abrupt increase in ICP approached levels near mean arterial pressure and led to a concomitant drop in cerebral blood flow resulting in circulatory arrest, as documented by TCD [61]. This study examined aneurysm rebleeding and does not provide direct evidence that intracranial circulatory arrest occurs with de novo aneurysm rupture. However, inadequate cerebral blood flow is frequently evidenced clinically by the transient loss of consciousness that occurs at SAH ictus. This mechanism of global transient circulatory arrest has been described in animal models of SAH at the time of initial hemorrhage [62, 63] and mimics the anoxic/hypoxic ischemic mechanism incurred by cardiac arrest.In this paper, published and ongoing clinical trials in cardiac arrest are compared to those in aneurysmal SAH to identify overlapping or complementary approaches to treatment as well as new avenues for potential research.


## 2. Methods

A search of PubMed was conducted in 11/2012 to identify randomized, controlled trials of aneurysmal SAH and cardiac arrest. Only human studies of adults (≥18 years of age), which tested an intervention published in English between 1980 and 2012, were included. Only trials examining mortality or neurologic outcome as a primary or secondary endpoint were reviewed. Only trials specific to SAH (not trials that included other neurocritical diagnoses or brain injury diagnoses) were included. Cardiac arrest trials included both out-of-hospital and in-hospital arrest and all arrest rhythms were included. Post hoc analyses of preexisting trials were not reviewed. If phase III results of a trial were available, earlier phases of the same trial were not included in analysis unless the patient population or methodology differed substantially.A PubMed search of the term “subarachnoid hemorrhage” and “neurologic outcome” with the limits of human, age > 18, English and randomized, controlled trial yielded 23 results. A PubMed search of the term “subarachnoid hemorrhage” and “mortality” with the limits of human, age > 18, English and randomized, controlled trial yielded 78 results. An additional review of articles identified by a broader search of “subarachnoid hemorrhage” with the limits of human, age > 18, English and randomized, controlled trial yielded 244 results. Review of these studies yielded 57 aneurysmal SAH trials that met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. A pubmed search of the terms “cardiac arrest” and “neurologic outcome” with the limits of human, English, age > 18 and randomized, controlled trial yielded 21 results. A PubMed search of the terms “cardiac arrest” and “mortality” with the limits of human, English, age > 18 and randomized, controlled trial yielded 197 results. Review of these studies yielded 46 cardiac arrest trials that met inclusion criteria and were analyzed.Clinicaltrials.gov was searched for ongoing interventional trials in cardiac arrest and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Only ongoing studies that were open and recruiting or preparing to recruit were included. Terminated studies were excluded from review. A search of ongoing studies on clinicaltrials.gov for the term “subarachnoid hemorrhage”, limited to interventional studies of adults ≥18 years old, produced 86 results and a search for the term “cardiac arrest” limited to interventional studies of adults with neurologic outcomes produced 46 results. Of these, 25 ongoing SAH trials and 14 cardiac arrest trials met the criteria for review.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Trials Analyzed

A total of 142 trials (82 SAH, 60 cardiac arrest) met review criteria. Of these, 103 were published in peer-reviewed journals and 39 were ongoing studies. Fifty-seven published randomized, controlled studies were identified in the SAH population and 46 in the cardiac arrest population. These studies are reviewed in detail in Tables1 and 2. Additionally, 25 ongoing SAH trials and 14 ongoing cardiac trials were reviewed (Tables 3 and 4).Table 1
Randomized controlled trials assessing neurologic outcomes after aneursymal Subarachnoid hemorrhage—completed trials.
Trial name
Study design
Treatment group
Control group
Outcome measure
Results
Reference
Calcium channel blockers—nimodipine
Cerebral Arterial Spasm—a controlled Trial of Nimodipine in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter prospective study of Hunt Hess grade I-II SAH patients
Nimodipine 0.7 mg/kg PO bolus, then 0.35 mg/kg q 4 × 21 days. Starting within 96 h of SAH (N=58)
Placebo (N=63)
Primary outcome: neurological deficit from arterial spasm and severity of neurologic deficit at 21 days
Nimodipine significantly reduced death or severe deficits from spasm at 21 days (2% versus 13% with placebo,P=0.03)
Allen et al., NEJM 1983 [3]
Nimodipine treatment in poor-grade aneurysm patients. Results of a multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial
Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Nimodipine 90 mg PO q 4 h × 21 d (N=91)
Placebo (N=97)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOSSecondary outcomes: delayed ischemic deficits, angiographic vasospasm
Better 3-month GOS in treatment group (29% versus 9% of treatment group,P<0.001). Significantly less delayed cerebral ischemia in treatment group, no difference in angiographic vasospasm
Petruk et al., J Neurosurg 1988 [4]
Controlled study of nimodipine in aneurysm patients treated early after subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of all Hunt-Hess grades within 96 hours of SAH
Nimodipine 60 mg q 4 h PO × 21 days + Nimodipine 200 mcg IV intraoperatively into basal cistern (N=38)
Placebo (N=37)
Primary outcome: mortality, cerebral blood flow measured by Xenon CTSecondary outcomes: 3-month intellectual or neurological deficit
Mortality was lower in the nimodipine group (4% versus 24% with placebo,P<0.05). Nimodipine did not significantly increase cerebral blood flow
Mee et al., Neurosurgery 1988 [5]
Effect of oral nimodipine on cerebral infarction and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: British aneurysm nimodipine trial
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial within 96 h of SAH
Nimodipine 60 mg q 4 PO × 21 d (N=276)
Placebo (N=278)
Primary outcome: 3-month cerebral infarction Secondary outcome: 3-month GOS
Significantly less cerebral infarction in the nimodipine group (22% compared to 33% in placebo,P=0.014). Poor GOS outcomes significantly reduced in nimodipine group at 3-months
Pickard et al., BMJ 1989 [6]
Early aneurysm surgery and preventive Therapy with intravenously administered nimodipine: A multicenter, double-blind, dose-comparison study
Randomized, double-blind, dose-comparison, multicenter study
Nimodipine 2 mg/h IV for 9–15 days(N=101)
Nimodipine 3 mg/h IV for 9–15 days(N=103)
Primary outcome: delayed neurological deficits, adverse drug reactions
No difference in delayed neurological deficits between the two groups
Gilsbach et al., Neurosurgery 1990 [7]
Long-term effects of nimodipine on cerebral infarcts and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and surgery
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled of Hunt-Hess I–III SAH patients
Nimodipine IV 0.5 mcg/kg/min × 7–10 days followed by 60 mg q 4 h PO × 21 days total(N=104)
Placebo (N=109)
Primary outcome: delayed ischemic deterioration and CT infarctsSecondary outcomes: GOS at 1–3 years
Significantly fewer deaths caused by delayed cerebral ischemia in nimodipine group (P=0.01) and fewer cerebral infarcts on CT (P=0.05). No differences in 1–3 year GOS or CT scan
Ohman et al., J Neurosurg 1991 [8]
A randomized outcome study of enteral versus intravenous nimodipine in 171 patients after acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, single-center study
Nimodipine 2 mg/h IV × 10 days then changed to PO × 6 d(N=87)
Nimodipine 60 mg PO q 4 × 16 days(N=84)
Primary outcome: delayed ischemic neurological deficitSecondary outcomes: 12 month GOS, mRS, Karnofsky, MRI infarcts, HRQoL
No difference in delayed ischemic neurological deficits (20% in enteral versus 16% in IV group,P=0.61), no difference in 12-month clinical outcomes
Soppi et al., World Neurosurgery 2012 [9]
Calcium channel blockers—nicardipine
A randomized controlled trial of high-dose intravenous nicardipine in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A report of the cooperative aneurysm study
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study
Nicardipine IV 0.15 mg/kg/h (N=449)
Placebo (N=457)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOSSecondary outcomes: angiographic vasospasm, TCD vasospasm, mortality, disability from vasospasm, symptomatic vasospasm, CT infarction, NIHSS
No difference in 3-month GOS. Less symptomatic vasospasm in treatment group (32% versus 46% in placebo group,P <0.001) and less angiographic vasospasm in treatment group (33% versus 51% of placebo, P <0.01) and less TCD vasospasm (23% versus 49% of placebo, P <0.001)
Haley et al., J Neurosurg 1993 [10, 11]
A randomized trial of two doses of nicardipine in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A report of the cooperative aneurysm study
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study
Nicardipine IV 0.15 mg/kg/h × 14 days(N =184)
Nicardipine IV 0.075 mg/kg/h × 14 days(N =181)
Primary outcome: symptomatic vasospasm, adverse drug events Secondary outcomes: 3-month GOS and NIHSS, mortality, disability due to vasospasm, CT infarction
No difference in symptomatic vasospasm or 3-month outcome. More adverse effects in high-dose nicardipine group
Haley et al., J Neurosurg 1994 [12]
Effect of nicardipine prolonged-release implants on cerebral vasospasm and clinical outcome after severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A prospective, randomized, double-blind phase IIa Study
Randomized, prospective double-blind phase IIa study in clipped SAH patients
Nicardipine prolonged-release implants (10 × 4 mg prolonged release rod shaped polymers) placed in basal cisterns(N =16)
Control-basal cisterns opened and washed out (N =16)
Primary outcome: angiographic vasospasm Secondary outcome: delayed ischemic lesion on HCT, 1-year mRS and NIHSS
Angiographic vasospasm significantly reduced in treatment group (7% versus 73% in controls,P <0.05). No significant difference in CT infarct. Decreased mortality in treatment group (6% versus 38% in control group, P =0.042) and better 1-year mRS and NIHSS (P =0.0001)
Barth et al., Stroke 2007 [13]
Antifibrinolytics
Antifibrinolysis with tranexamic acid in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A consecutive controlled clinical trial
Randomized, placebo-controlled, study
Tranexamic acid 1 g q 4 h IV × 1 week then 1 g q 6 h IV × 1 week then 1.5 g q 6 h PO × 1 week(N =30)
Placebo(N =29)
Primary outcome: recurrent hemorrhage diagnosed by LP, HCT, echoencephalogram or autopsy.Secondary outcome: angiographic vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia, death
Tranexamic acid protected against rebleeding during the first 2 weeks of treatment but also resulted in cerebral ischemic complications
Fodstad et al., Neurosurgery 1981 [14]
Comparative clinical trial of epsilon amino-caproic acid and tranexamic acid in the prevention of early recurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized trial
Epsilon amino-caproic acid 6 g q 6 h IV continued until surgery or discharge(N =90)
Tranexamic acid 1 g q 6 h IV continued until surgery or discharge(N =61)
Primary outcome: recurrent hemorrhage diagnosed clinically by HCT, LP, or autopsy Secondary outcome: delayed ischemic deficit diagnosed by clinical deterioration, angiographic vasospasm, and infarct on HCT
Rebleeding occurred in 8% of aminocaproic-acid-treated patients and 10% of tranexamic acid treated patients. Delayed ischemic deficits occurred in 7% of aminocaproic acid patients and 5% of tranexamic acid patients. Mortality was 11% in each group.P =NS for all outcomes
Chowdhary and Sayed, JNNP 1981 [15]
Antifibrinolytic treatment in subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study
Tranexamic acid 1 g q 4 h IV × 1 week then 1 g q 6 h IV × 3 weeks(N = 241)
Placebo(N =238)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOSSecondary outcome: neurological deterioration, rebleeding, infarction, hydrocephalus, edema, epilepsy
Rebleeding reduced from 24% in control group to 9% in treatment group (P <0.001), but with concurrent increase in ischemic complications (24% in treatment group versus 15% in placebo, P <0.01). No difference in 3 month GOS
Vermeulen et al., NEJM 1984 [16]
Antifibrinolytic treatment in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized placebo-controlled trial (STAR)
Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized trial within 96 hours of SAH onset in whom aneurysm repair was delayed beyond 48 hours
Tranexamic acid 1 g IV q 4 h × 1 week then 1.5 g PO q 6 h × 2 weeks(N =229)
Placebo(N =233)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOSSecondary outcomes: rebleeding, delayed cerebral ischemia, hydrocephalus, postoperative ischemia
No difference in 3-month GOS. Significant decrease in rebleeding from 33% in placebo group to 19% in treatment group. No difference in delayed cerebral ischemia, hydrocephalus, or postoperative ischemia
Roos, Neurology 2000 [17]
Immediate administration of tranexamic acid and reduced incidence of early rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective randomized study
Randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Tranexamic acid 1 g IV bolus, then 1 g IV q 6 hours until aneurysm repair or 72 hours post ictus.(N =254)
Placebo(N =251)
Primary outcome: Rebleeding by HCTSecondary outcome: 6 -month GOS, clinical vasospasm/delayed ischemic neurological deficit, TCD spasm
Treatment group had reduced rebleeding rate of 2.4% compared to 10.8% in the placebo group (P <0.01). More favorable outcome in the treatment group (74.8% compared to 70.5% in the control group, P =NS). No increased risk of ischemia
Hillman et al., J Neurosurg 2002 [18]
Neuroprotectives drugs
A double-blind clinical evaluation of the effect of nizofenone on delayed ischemic neurological deficits following aneurysmal rupture
Randomized, placebo controlled trail
Nizofenone for 5–10 days(N =42)
Placebo(N =48)
Primary outcome: delayed ischemic neurological deficits with angiographically confirmed vasospasm.Secondary outcomes: one-month disability index, motor, and speech function
No difference in delayed ischemic events between treatment groups. Among patients with vasospasm, those who received nizofenone had better one-month functional outcomes (P <0.05)
Saito et al., Neurol Res 1983 [19]
Nizofenone administration in the acute stage following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Results of a multicenter controlled double-blind clinical study
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of Hunt Hess grade I–IV
Nizofenone 5 mg × 2 weeks(N =102)
Placebo(N =106)
Primary outcome: neurological exam at 1-month and discharge
Significantly improved one-month or discharge functional outcome in treatment group compared to placebo (P <0.05). No difference in mortality
Ohta et al., J Neurosurg 1986 [20]
Effect of a free radical scavenger, edaravone, in the treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, controlled, single-center study
Edaravone 30 mg IV BID × 14 days(N =49)
Control (usual treatment)(N =42)
Primary outcome: delayed ischemic neurological deficitsSecondary outcomes: cerebral infarction due to vasospasm, 3-month GOS
No difference in delayed ischemic neurological deficits between treatment and control groups. Less cerebral infarction in treatment group (0% versus 66%,P =0.028). Poor outcome caused by vasospasm 0% in treatment group and 71% in control group (P =0.046)
Munakata et al., Neurosurgery 2009 [21]
Eicosapentaenoic Acid Cerebral Vasospasm Therapy Study (EVAS)
Randomized, controlled, open label, multicenter, efficacy study of surgically clipped SAH patients
Eicosapentaenoic acid (omega 3 fatty acid) 900 mg TID × 30 days(N =81)
Control (usual treatment)(N =81)
Primary outcome: symptomatic vasospasm or infarct on HCTSecondary outcome: 1-month GOS
Symptomatic vasospasm occurred significantly less in the treatment group (15% versus 30% in controls,P =0.022) as did infarction from vasospasm (7% versus 21% in controls, P =0.012)
Yoneda et al., World Neurosurg 2012 [22]
Safety and efficacy of NA-1 in patients with iatrogenic stroke after endovascular aneurysm repair (ENACT): a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of ruptured (WFNS 1–3) and unruptured aneurysms undergoing endovascular repair
NA-1 2.6 mg/kg infusion over 10 minutes(N =92)
Placebo(N =93)
Primary outcome: safety, number and volume of ischemic strokes on MRI DWI and FLAIR 12–96 hours after infusion Secondary outcome: 30-day mRS, NIHSS, neurocognitive outcome
No difference in MRI lesion volume, but fewer ischemic lesions in NA-1 group compared to placebo (P =0.012). In the SAH subgroup (20% of cohort) their MRI number and ischemic volume was significantly less in the treatment group. No difference in 30 day NIHSS or mRS between groups
Hill et al., Lancet Neurol 2012 [23]
Statins
Simvastatin reduces vasospasm After aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a pilot randomized clinical trial
Randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial
Simvastatin 80 mg qd for 14 days(N =19)
Placebo(N =20)
Primary outcome: delayed ischemic neurological deficit confirmed by TCD or angiography. Secondary outcomes: liver transaminases, CK, von Willebrand factor, S100
Vasospasm occurred in 26% of treatment group compared to 60% of placebo group (P <0.05). No differences in transaminitis or myositis. VWF and S100 were significantly lower in the treatment group (P <0.05)
Lynch et al., Stroke 2005 [24]
Effects of acute treatment with pravastatin on cerebral vasospasm, autoregulation, and delayed Ischemic deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A phase II randomized placebo-controlled trial
Randomized placebo-controlled, phase II Trial
Pravastatin 40 mg PO qd × 14 d(N =40)
Placebo(N =40)
Primary outcome: incidence, severity, and duration of vasospasm on TCD, duration of impaired autoregulation measured by transient hyperemic response on TCDSecondary outcome: vasospasm-related delayed ischemic deficits, disability at discharge
TCD vasospasm and severe vasospasm were reduced in the treatment group (P =0.006 and P =0.044, resp.). Duration of impaired autoregulation shortened in treatment group (P <0.01). Vasospasm-related delayed ischemic deficits was reduced (P <0.001) and mortality was reduced (P =0.037)
Tseng et al., Stroke 2005 [25]
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of simvastatin in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study
Simvastatin 80 mg qd in statin naïve Fisher 3 SAH until discharge or 21 days(N =19)
Placebo(N =20)
Primary outcome: death and drug morbidity (elevated CK, transaminases)Secondary outcomes: TCD, angiographic or clinical vasospasm, vasospasm-related infarcts, clinical outcomes at discharge, cardiac, and infectious morbidities
Mortality in 0% treatment group and 15% placebo group. Angiographically confirmed vasospasm in 26% treatment group and 25% placebo group. Vasospasm infarcts in 11% treatment group and 25% placebo group. All differencesP =NS
Chou et al., Stroke 2008 [26]
Biological effects of simvastatin in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial
Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial
Simvastatin 80 mg PO × 15 days(N =16)
Placebo(N =16)
Primary outcome: effect of simvastatin on laboratory parameters of endothelial function, fibrinolysis, coagulation, inflammation and cholesterolSecondary outcomes: TCD vasospasm, clinical signs of DCI, 3- and 6-month GOS
Simvastatin group had significantly lower total cholesterol and LDL, but no differences in coagulation, fibrinolysis, endothelium function, or inflammation. No differences in TCD vasospasm, clinical DCI, or poor outcome
Vergouwen et al., J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009 [27]
Aneurysm repair
Timing of operation for ruptured supratentorial aneurysms: a prospective randomized study
Randomized, prospective study of Hunt Hess grade I–III SAH patients
Acute surgery (day 0–3 after SAH)(N =71)
Intermediate surgery (day 4–7 after SAH)(N =70) Late surgery (day 8 or later after SAH) (N =70)
Primary outcome: 3-month dead, dependent or independent.Secondary outcomes: Neurological deficit from direct effect of initial bleed, complication of surgery, confirmed rebleeding, delayed ischemic deterioration, hydrocephalus, extracranial complications
Acute surgery patients were more often independent at 3-months (92% versus 79% in intermediate timing and 80% in the late timing group,P <0.01). Mortality was 6% in the early surgery group versus 13% in the late surgery group (P =NS)
Ohman and Heiskanen, J Neurosurg 1989 [28]
International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial
Randomized, unblinded trial of SAH patients with an aneurysm judged technically suitable for either clipping or coiling and clinical equipoise
Surgical clipping(N =1070)
Endovascular treatment by detachable platinum coils(N =1073)
Primary outcome: 1-year mRS 3–6 versus 1-2 Secondary outcomes: rebleeding, quality of life at 1 year (euroQol), frequency of epilepsy, cost effectiveness, neuropsychological outcomes
Dependent or dead at 1 year: 23.7% endovascular versus 30.6% clipping (P =0.0019).
Molyneux et al., ISAT Collaborative Group, Lancet 2002 [29]
International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion
Randomized, unblinded trial of SAH patients with an aneurysm judged technically suitable for either clipping or coiling and clinical equipoise
Surgical clipping(N =1070)
Endovascular treatment by detachable platinum coils(N =1073)
Primary outcome: 1-year mRS 3–6 versus 1-2Secondary outcomes: rebleeding, quality of life at 1-year (Euroqol), frequency of epilepsy, cost effectiveness, neuropsychological outcomes
Dead or dependent at 1-year: 23.5% of endovascular group versus 30.9% of clipping group. ARR 7.4%. Early survival advantage of coiling maintained up to 7 years (P =0.03). Lower risk of epilepsy in coiled group but higher late rebleeding risk in coiled group
Molyneux et al., Lancet 2005 [30]
The barrow ruptured aneurysm trial
Randomized, open-label, prospective, single-center study
Surgical clipping(N =238)
Endovascular coiling(N =233)
Primary outcome: 1-year mRS > 2
Poor outcome in 33.7% of clipped and 23.2% of coiled patients (P =0.02)
McDougall et al., J Neurosurg 2012 [31]
Lipid peroxidation inhibitor
Randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of tirilazad mesylate in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cooperative study in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand
Double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study in men and women with aneurysmal SAH
Tirilazad 0.6 mg/kg/ (N =257)Tirilazad 2 mg/kg/d(N =249)Tirilazad 6 mg/kg/d(N =256)up to 11 days
Placebo containing citrate vehicle(N =253)
Primary outcome: Symptomatic vasospasm Secondary outcome: 3-month GOS, NIHSS, infarct volume on head CT
The subgroup 6 mg/kg treatment arm had reduced mortality (P =NS) and better 3-month GOS (P =NS) compared to placebo. Less symptomatic vasospasm in 6 mg/kg group, but not significant. Men showed more benefit than women. No significant improvement with lower dosing groups
Kassell et al., J Neurosurg 1996 [32]
A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of tirilazad mesylate in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cooperative study in North America
Double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study in men and women with aneursymal SAH
Tirilazad 2 mg/kg/d(N =298) Tirilazad 6 mg/kg/d (N =299) up to 11 days
Placebo containing citrate vehicle (N =300)
Primary outcome: mortality at 76 days Secondary outcome: 3-month GOS and NIHSS, infarct volume on head CT symptomatic vasospasm, incidence, and severity of angiographic vasospasm
No difference in mortality, favorable GOS outcome, or employment between groups. No differences in symptomatic or angiographic vasospasm
Haley et al., J Neurosurg 1997 [33]
Double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study of high-dose tirilazad mesylate in women with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Part I a cooperative study in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa
Double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study in women with aneurysmal SAH
Tirilazad mesylate 15 mg/kg/d IV hours for 11 days(N =405)
Placebo containing citrate vehicle (N =414)
Primary outcome: 91-day mortality Secondary outcome: 3-month GOS, clinical vasospasm, use of hypervolemic hypertensive therapy, neurological worsening from vasospasm, cerebral infarction, use of angioplasty, safety endpoints
Mortality rates and 3-month GOS not different between groups. Lower symptomatic vasospasm in tirilazad group (24.8% versus 33.7% in placebo group,P =0.005). Cerebral infarction 8% in treatment group versus 13% in placebo group (P <0.04)
Lanzino et al., J Neurosurg 1999 [34]
Double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study of high-dose tirilazad mesylate in women with aneursymal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Part II a cooperative study in North America
Double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study in women with aneurysmal SAH
Tirilazad mesylate 15 mg/kg/d IV up to 11 days(N =410)
Placebo containing citrate vehicle(N =413)
Primary outcome: mortality at 91 days in WFNS grade IV-V patients Secondary outcomes: 3 month GOS or clinical vasospasm 1–14 days from dosing, use of hypervolemic hypertensive therapy, neurological worsening from vasospasm, cerebral infarction, use of angioplasty, safety endpoints
No differences in mortality when analyzing the entire population. No difference in GOS, symptomatic vasospasm, vasospasm severity. In WFNS grades IV-V, lower mortality in treatment group (24.6% versus 43.4% in placebo,P =0.016). In WFNS I–III improved GOS in placebo group (83.3% versus 76.7% in treatment group, P =0.04)
Lanzino and Kassell, J Neurosurg 1999 [35]
Thrombolytics
Prevention of delayed ischemic deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage by intrathecal bolus injection of tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA)
Prospective, controlled trial of Fisher III clipped SAH patients
rTPA 10 mg IV intracisternal immediately following aneurysm clipping ± 5–10 mg IV TPA intraventricularly in patients with IVH(N =52)
No TPA instillation(N =68)
Primary outcome: clinical delayed ischemic deficits attributed to vasospasm Secondary outcome: 3-month GOS
Significantly less transient and permanent delayed ischemic deficits and better GOS in rTPA group
Seifert et al., Acta Neurochir 1994 [36]
A randomized trial of intraoperative, intracisternal tissue plasminogen activator for the prevention of vasospasm
Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study
rTPA 10 mg intracisternal at the time of aneurysm clipping(N =51)
Placebo vehicle (N =49)
Primary outcome: angiographic vasospasm Secondary outcome: mortality, 3-month GOS, symptomatic vasospasm, clot clearance on CT, TCD velocities, use of HHH on angioplasty to treat vasospasm
No difference in angiographic vasospasm, vasospasm treatment, TCD velocities, mortality, or 3-month GOS
Findlay, Neurosurgery 1995 [37]
Efficacy of low-dose tissue-plasminogen activator intracisternal administration for the prevention of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, controlled trial
Intermittent Tisokinase 960,000 IU via cisternal drain(N =20) Continuous infusion Tisokinase 1920 IU/h × 48 h via cisternal drain(N =20)
Control (standard treatment)(N =20)
Primary outcome: clearance of subarachnoid clots by HCTSecondary outcome: delayed cerebral ischemia, 3-month mRS and GOS
Subarachnoid clot by HCT and delayed cerebral ischemia were significantly less in the treatment groups compared to control (P <0.05). The intermittently treated group had better neurological outcomes than the control group (P <0.05)
Yamamoto et al., World Neurosurgery 2010 [38]
Anti-platelets
Dipyridamole and postoperative ischemic deficits in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind controlled trial
Dipyridamole 100 mg PO qd or 10 mg/day IV × 3-months(N =336)
Placebo(N =314)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOSSecondary outcome: neurological deterioration following aneurysm repair
No differences in 3-month GOS or delayed neurological deterioration
Shaw et al., J Neurosurg 1985 [39]
Randomized controlled trial of acetylsalicylic Acid in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the MASH study
Randomized controlled pilot study; factorial design (magnesium versus placebo and ASA versus placebo, separated a priori)
Aspirin 100 mg PR qd × 14 days within 12 hours of aneurysm occlusion.(N =87)
Placebo(N =74)
Primary outcome: delayed ischemic neurological deficits within 3-months of SAH consisting of HCT infarcts plus clinical declineSecondary outcome:new CT infarcts of any cause, postop hemorrhage, mRS ≥ 4, mRS ≥ 1
No difference in delayed ischemic events, CT infarction, or 3-month outcomes
Van den Bergh, Stroke 2006 [40]
Cilostazol improves outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a preliminary report
Randomized, single-blind, prospective, multicenter study
Cilostazol 100 mg PO BID(N =49)
Control (usual care)(N =51)
Primary outcome: symptomatic vasospasm and cerebral infarction, discharge mRS
No difference in symptomatic vasospasm or cerebral infarction. mRS at discharge better in treatment group (1.5 versus 2.6 in controls,P =0.041)
Suzuki et al., Cerebrovasc Dis 2011 [41]
Steroids
Effect of fludrocortisone acetate in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, placebo controlled, multicenter trial
Fludrocortisone 400 mcg/day BID × 12 days PO or IV(N =46)
Placebo(N =45)
Primary outcome:plasma volume change, fluid balance, sodium balanceSecondary outcome: delayed cerebral ischemia within 28 days and 28-day GOS
Treatment reduced negative sodium balance (P =0.014) but did not affect plasma volume. No significant difference in cerebral ischemia (22% versus 31% in controls, P =0.349). Similar outcome in each group
Hasan et al., Stroke 1989 [42]
A randomized controlled trial of hydrocortisone against hyponatremia in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, placebo-controlled study
Hydrocortisone 300 mg q 6 h × 10 d then taper over 4 d(N =35)
Placebo(N =36)
Primary outcome: hyponatremia< 140 mmol/LSecondary outcome:30-day mRS, symptomatic vasospasm
Less sodium excretion and urine volume in treatment group (P =0.04). No significant differences in vasospasm or mRS
Katayama et al.,Stroke 2007 [43]
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of high-dose methylprednisolone in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrrhage
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single center study
Methylprednisolone 16 mg/kg IV qd × 3 days(N =49)
Placebo(N =46)
Primary outcome: symptomatic vasospasm and infarct on HCTSecondary Outcomes: 1 year GOS, functional outcome scale, and severity of delayed ischemic deficits
No significant difference in symptomatic vasospasm or infarct on HCT. No difference in 1-year GOS or delayed ischemic deficits at 3-months. Poor outcome by functional outcome scale was reduced in treatment group (P =0.02)
Gomis et al.,J Neurosurg 2010 [44]
Transfusion/erythropoietin/albumin
Acute systemic erythropoietin therapy to reduce delayed ischemic deficits following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Erythropoietin IV (30,000 u) every 48 h for a total of 90,000 U(N =40)
Placebo(N =40)
Primary outcome: incidence, duration and severity of TCD vasospasm; duration of impaired autoregulation by TCDSecondary outcome: incidence of delayed ischemic deficits, mRS, GOS, and NIHSS at discharge and 6-months
No differences in incidence of TCD vasospasm or adverse events. Treatment group had less severe TCD vasospasm (P =−0.037), reduced delayed ischemic deficits/delayed cerebral infarcts (P =0.001), and shortened duration of impaired autoregulation (P <0.001) and more favorable discharge outcome (P =0.039)
Tseng et al.,J Neurosurg 2009 [45]
Prospective, randomized trial of higher goal hemoglobin after SAH
Prospective, randomized pilot safety, and feasibility study
Packed RBC transfusion to goal Hgb 11.5 g/dL(N =21)
Packed RBC transfusion to goal Hgb 10 g/dL(N =23)
Primary outcomes: days of core temp > 100.4 F, ventilator-free days, hemoglobin levelSecondary outcomes: NIHSS, mRS, and MRI at 14 days, mRS at 28 days and 3-months
Higher target Hgb resulted in more transfusions. No difference in safety endpoints. Number of MRI infarcts, NIHSS, and mRS similar between both groups at all timepoints
Naidech et al., Neurocrit Care 2010 [46]
The Albumin in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage multicenter pilot clinical trial: safety and neurologic outcomes (ALISAH)
Open label, dose escalation study
Albumin in 3 tier doses: 0.625 g/kg/d (N =20), 1.25 g/kg/d (N =20), 1.875 g/kg/d (N =7) × 7 days(N =47 total)
NA
Primary outcomes: severe to life threatening heart failure, anaphylaxisSecondary outcomes: functional outcome at 3-months
Doses up to 1.25 g/kg/d × 7 days tolerated without dose-limiting complications. Trend toward better outcomes in 1.25 g/kg/d dose compared to 0.625 g/kg/d
Suarez et al.,Stroke 2012 [47]
Vasodilators—CRGP and endothelin receptor antagonist
Effect of calcitonin-gene-related peptide in patients with delayed postoperative cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, single-blind, controlled, multicenter study
Calcitonin-related gene peptide (0.6mcg/min) × 10 days(N =62)
Standard medical therapy(N =55)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOS
No difference in 3-month GOS. Hypotension common in treatment group.
Bell, European CGRP in subarachnoid Hemorrhage study group, Lancet 1992 [48]
Clazosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, in patients with aneurysmal SAh undergoing surgical clipping: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial(CONSCIOUS 2)
Phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded
Clazosentan (5 mg/h IV up to 14 days)(N =748)
Placebo(N =389)
Primary outcomes: cerebral vasospasm-related morbidity (DCI/DIND/vasospasm therapy), all-cause mortality at 6 weeksSecondary outcomes: 12-week GOSE
No effect on primary endpoint (21% in clazosentan group and 25% in placebo groupP =NS). Poor outcome (GOSE) in 29% clazosentan and 25% placebo group
MacDonald et al., Lancet Neuol 2011 [49]
Randomized trial of clazosentan in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage undergoing endovascular coiling(CONSCIOUS 3)
Phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded;terminated early for futility (planned N =1500)
Clazosentan(5 or 15 mg/h IV up to 14 days)(N =194)
Placebo(N =189)
Primary outcomes: cerebral vasospasm related morbidity (DCI/DIND/vasospasm therapy), all-cause mortality at 6 weeksSecondary outcomes: 12-week GOSE
Clazosentan 15 mg/h significantly reduced vasospasm-related morbidity/all-cause mortality at 6 weeks but did not improve long-term outcomePrimary outcome: 24% in clazosentan 5 mg/h and 27% in placebo group P =NS and 15% in clazosentan 15 mg/h P =0.007 Poor outcome in 25% of clazosentan 5 mg/h, 28% clazosentan 15 mg/h, and 24% of placebo group P =NS.
MacDonald et al., Stroke 2012 [50]
Hypertensive, hypervolemic therapy (prophylactic)
Effect of hypervolemic therapy on cerebral blood flow after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized controlled trial
Randomized, controlled, single-center study
High-volume management (with colloid and crystalloid) to target PADP ≥ 14 mmHg or CVP ≥ 8 mmHg(N =41)
Normal volume management (with colloid and crystalloid) to target PADP ≥ 7 mmHg or CVP ≥ 5 mmHg(N =41)
Primary outcome: CBF by Xenon CT and blood volume by tagged RBCSecondary outcomes: symptomatic vasospasm, medical complications, GOS and 3, 6, and 12 months
High-volume management patients received significantly more fluid but there was no effect on net fluid balance or blood volume. No difference in CBF or vasospasm
Lennihan et al.,Stroke 2000 [51]
Prophylactic hyperdynamic postoperative fluid therapy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a clinical, prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Randomized, controlled Prospective, trial of Hunt Hess I–III patients
Hypertensive (MAP 20 mmHg greater than pre-op), hypervolemic (CVP 8–12 mmHg) and hemodilutional (Hct 30–35%) therapy(N =16)
Normovolemic crystalloid fluid therapy until day 12(N =16)
Primary outcome: TCD vasospasm, CBF by SPECT on day 12Secondary outcomes: 1 year GOS, neuropsych outcomes, and SPECT
No differences in TCD vasospasm or SPECT CBF. No difference in 1-year GOS, SPECT, or neuropsych outcomes
Egge et al.,Neurosurgery 2001 [52]
Magnesium
Intravenous magnesium sulfate for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (IMASH): a randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial
Randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial.
MgSO4 IV infusion to 2x baseline value (20 mmol over 30 minutes then continuous infusion of 80 mmol/d × 14 days; maximum allowed serum Mg of 2.5 mmol/L(N =169)
Equivalent volume of normal saline infusion. Occasional changes in infusion rates to maintain blinding.(N =158)
Primary outcome: 6-month GOSE 5–8Secondary outcome: clinical vasospasm during initial 2 weeks, 6-month mRS, Barthel Index, and Short Form 36
Favorable 6-month GOSE (5–8) 64% of Mg group and 63% placebo (P =NS)No difference in mRS, Barthel, Short Form 36, or clinical vasospasm. No subgroup differences
Wong et al.,Stroke 2010 [53]
Magnesium for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (MASH-2): a randomized placebo-controlled trial
Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter, phase III trial
MgSO4 IV 64 mmol/day(N =606)
Placebo(N =507)
Primary outcome: 3-month mRS 4–6
No difference in poor outcome in the MgSO4 group (26.2% versus 25.3% in placebo group)
Mees et al.,Lancet 2012 [54]
Adrenergic blockade
Beneficial effects of adrenergic blockade in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized controlled trial
Phentolamine 20 mg q 3 h + propranolol 80 mg q 8 × 3 weeks(N =68)
Placebo(N =66)
Primary outcome: neurological deficit at 28 days
Trend toward less neurological deficit in the treated group (P =0.053)
Walter et al.,BMJ 1982 [55]
Endovascular therapy
Effect of prophylactic transluminal balloon angioplasty on cerebral vasospasm and outcome in patients with Fisher grade III subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a phase II multicenter, randomized clinical trial
Unblinded, randomized phase II trial of Fisher III and Fisher III + IV SAH patients after clipping or coiling within 96 h of rupture
Balloon angioplasty of bilateral A1, M1, P1, basilar, intradural vertebral artery, and supraclinoid ICA. Protocol later revised to exclude A1 and P1(N =85)
No prophylactic balloon angioplasty(N =85)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOSSecondary outcome: delayed ischemic neurological deficit, TCD vasospasm, ICU, and hospital length of stay
Nonsignificant difference in delayed ischemic neurological deficits but less therapeutic angioplasty required in treatment group (P =0.03). No significant difference in GOS outcomes. LOS similar. Four patients had procedure related vessel perforation, three of whom died
Zwienenberg-Lee et al., Stroke 2008 [56]
Rho kinase inhibitor—fasudil
Effect of AT877 on cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Results of a prospective placebo-controlled double-blind trial
Randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, multicenter study in Hunt Hess I–IV clipped SAH patients
Fasudil (AT877)30 mg IV over 30 minutes, TID × 14 days(N =131)
Placebo(N =136)
Primary outcome: reduction of incidence or severity of angiographic vasospasm, reduction of incidence and size of low-density CT lesions due to vasospasm, reduction of incidence of symptomatic vasospasm, poor outcome (1-month GOS) due to vasospasm
Fasudil significantly reduced angiographic vasospasm (38% in treatment group versus 61% in placebo group,P =0.0023), infarcts reduced (16% in treatment versus 38% in placebo group, P =0.0013) and symptomatic vasospasm reduced (35% in treatment versus 50% in placebo, P =0.0247). Poor outcome (GOS 1–4) attributable to vasospasm occurred in 12% of treatment group and 26% of placebo group (P =0.0152). No serious adverse events in fasudil group
Shibuya et al.,J Neurosurg 1992 [57]
Efficacy and safety of fasudil in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: final results of a randomized trial of fasudil versus nimodipine
Randomized, open label, multicenter study of SAH Hunt-Hess grade I–IV clipped patients
Fasudil 30 mg IV TID × 14 days(N =63)
Nimodipine 1-2 mg/h × 14 days(N =66)
Primary outcome: symptomatic vasospasm or infarct on HCTSecondary outcome:1-month GOS
No difference in symptomatic vasospasm or HCT infarcts. Improved GOS outcomes in fasudil group (good outcome in 74.5% versus 61.7% in nimodipine group,P =0.040)
Zhao et al.,Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2011 [58]
Intensive insulin therapy
The effect of intensive insulin therapy on infection rate, vasospasm, neurologic outcome and mortality in neurointensive care unit after intracranial aneurysm clipping in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized prospective Pilot trial
Randomized, controlled study
Intensive Insulin Infusion (80–120 mg/dL) × 14 d(N =40)
Conventional insulin infusion (glucose 80–220 mg/dL) × 14 d(N=38)
Primary outcome: infectionSecondary outcomes: vasospasm, 6-month mortality, and mRS
Higher infection rate in the conventional group (42% versus 27% in intensive group,P<0.001). Similar vasospasm, mortality, and mRS at 6 months
Bilotta et al.,J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2007 [59]
Hypothermia
Mild intraoperative hypothermia during surgery for intracranial aneurysm (IHAST)
Randomized, prospective, partially blinded, controlled, multicenter trial of WFNS grade I–III SAH patients
Intraoperative hypothermia (target 33°C with surface cooling)(N =499)
Intraoperative normothermia (target 36.5°C)(N =501)
Primary outcome: GOS at 90 daysSecondary outcomes: 90-day mRS, Barthel Index, NIHSS, neuropsych testing, adverse events
No difference in 90 day GOS. Good GOS in 66% of hypothermia versus 63% of control patients (P =NS). No differences in death, length of stay, or discharge disposition. Postoperative bacteremia more common in the hypothermia group (5% versus 3%, P =0.05)
Todd et al.,NEJM 2005 [60]Table 2
Randomized controlled trials assessing neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest—completed trials.
Trial name
Study design
Treatment group
Control group
Outcome measure
Results
Reference
Calcium channel blockers
Effects of nimodipine on cerebral blood flow and cerebrospinal fluid pressure after cardiac arrest: correlation with neurologic outcome
Randomized, double-blind study
Nimodipine IV 0.25 mcg/kg/min(N =25)
Placebo(N =26)
Primary outcome: CBF measured by Xenon CTSecondary outcomes: ICP, neurological disability
Higher CBF in nimodipine group in first 4 hours after arrest (P <0.05) but no difference at 24 hours. No difference in neurological outcomes
Forsman et al.,Anesth Analg 1989 [64]
Neuropsychological sequelae of cardiac arrest
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation
Nimodipine 10 mcg/kg IV then 0.5 mcg/kg/min × 24 hours(N =35)
Placebo(N =33)
Primary outcome: 3- and 12-month neuropsychological and cognitive batteries
No difference in neuropsychological or cognitive outcome between groups
Roine et al.,JAMA 1992 [65]
A randomized clinical study of a calcium-entry blocker (lidoflazine) in the treatment of comatose survivors of cardiac arrest
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study
Lidoflazine 1 mg/kg loading dose then 0.25 mg/kg at 8 and 16 hours after resuscitation(N =259)
Placebo(N =257)
Primary outcome: Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Scale at 6 monthsSecondary outcomes: mortality, complications
No difference in 6-month neurological outcome or mortality between groups
Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial II Study Group, NEJM 1991 [66]
Nimodipine after resuscitation from out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation
Nimodipine 10 mcg/kg IV then 0.5 mcg/kg/min × 24 hours(N =75)
Placebo(N =80)
Primary outcome: survival, 1-year GOSSecondary outcomes: death related to anoxic encephalopathy, GCS at 24 hours and 1 week, 3- and 12-month mini-mental state exam, activities of daily living, Barthel index, neurological exam, seizure, SPECT, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias
No difference in the survival rate, GOS at 3 or 12 months. No difference in minimental state exam, activities of daily living, or seizures
Roine et al.,JAMA 1990 [67]
Neuroprotective
Coenzyme Q 10 combined with mild hypothermia after cardiac arrest: a preliminary study
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single-center study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Hypothermia 35-36°C × 24 hours + Coenzyme Q 10 250 mg PO × 1 then 150 mg PO TID(N =25)
Hypothermia 35-36°C × 24 hours + Placebo(N =24)
Primary outcome: survival to ICU dischargeSecondary outcomes: 3-month survival, 3-month GOS, S100 levels
3-month survival was 68% in the treatment group and 29% in the control group (P =0.0413). There was no significant difference in survival until discharge or GOS outcome
Damian et al., Circulation 2004 [68]
Thrombolytics
A pilot randomized trial of thrombolysis in cardiac arrest (the TICA trial)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, single-center, feasibility trial for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Tenecteplase 50 mg IV × 1(N =19)
Placebo(N =16)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: survival to ED, ICU and hospital discharge
ROSC in 42% of tenecteplase and 6% of placebo group. No difference in survival to hospital discharge
Fatovich et al., Resuscitation 2004 [69]
Thrombolysis during resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Tenecteplase 0.5 mg/kg IV(N =525)
Placebo(N =525)
Primary outcome: survival at 30 daysSecondary outcomes: survival to admission, ROSC, 24-hour survival, survival to discharge, cerebral performance score at discharge
No difference in 30-day survival, hospital admission, ROSC, 24-hour survival, discharge, or neurologic outcome. More intracranial hemorrhages in treatment group
Böttiger et al., NEJM 2008 [70]
Steroids and pressors
Vasopressin, epinephrine, and corticosteroids for In-hospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center study
Vasopressin 20 IU IV + epinephrine 1 mg IV + methylprednisolone 40 mg IV followed by hydrocortisone(N =48)
Epinephrine + placebo(N =52)
Primary outcome: ROSC, survival to dischargeSecondary outcomes: blood pressure after CPR, organ failure-free days, discharge Glasgow-Pittsburg cerebral performance scale
More ROSC in treatment group (81% versus 52%,P =0.003) and more survival to discharge (19% versus 4%, P =0.02)
Mentzelopoulos et al.,Arch Intern Med 2009 [71]
Pressors
A comparison of standard-dose and high-dose epinephrine in cardiac arrest outside the hospital
Randomized, double-blind, prospective, multi-center study
Epinephrine 0.2 mg/kg IV(N =648)
Epinephrine 0.02 mg/kg IV(N =632)
Primary outcome: return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), admission to the hospitalSecondary outcome: cerebral performance scale at admission, and discharge
No difference in ROSC rates, admission, survival, or discharge neurological status
Brown et al., NEJM 1992 [72]
Standard doses versus repeated high doses of epinephrine in cardiac arrest outside the hospital
Randomized, double-blind, prospective, single-center study
Repeated epinephrine 5 mg IV(N =271)
Repeated epinephrine 1 mg IV(N =265)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: admission to the hospital, discharge, cerebral performance category at discharge and 6 months
No difference in ROSC, admission, discharge, or 6-month neurological outcomes
Choux et al., Resuscitation 1995 [73]
A randomized, double-blind comparison of methoxamine and epinephrine in human cardiopulmonary arrest
Randomized, double-blind, single-center study
Methoxamine 40 mg bolus IV then 40 mg 4 minutes later(N =77)
Epinephrine 2 mg bolus then 2 mg IV q 4 min(N =68)
Primary outcome: Mortality and Glasgow-Pittsburgh coma scoreSecondary outcomes: ROSC, successful resuscitation
No difference in ROSC or neurologic outcome, initial resuscitation, or survival to discharge
Patrick et al.,Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995 [74]
Randomised comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation
Randomized, double-blind, single-center, controlled study of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation patients who failed defibrillation
Vasopressin 40 IU IV(N =20)
Epinephrine 1 mg IV(N =20)
Primary outcome: survival to admissionSecondary outcome: 24-hour survival, survival to discharge, GCS at discharge
No significant difference in survival to admission but more vasopressin patients survived 24 hours (60% versus 20%,P =0.02). No difference in survival to discharge or GCS at discharge
Lindner et al.,Lancet 1997 [75]
High-dose versus standard-dose epinephrine treatment of cardiac arrest after failure of standard therapy
Randomized, controlled, single-blind, multicenter study of patients who had failed on standard dose of epinephrine 0.5–1.0 mg IV
Epinephrine 0.1 mg/kg IV up to 4 doses(N =78)
Epinephrine 0.01 mg/kg IV up to 4 doses(N =62)
Primary outcome: improvement in cardiac rhythm or ROSCSecondary outcomes: GCS at 6, 24, and 72 hours
No differences in ROSC, survival, or neurologic function between groups
Sherman et al., Pharmacotherarpy 1997 [76]
A comparison of repeated high doses and repeated standard doses of epinephrine for cardiac arrest outside the hospital
Randomized, controlled, prospective multicenter study
Epinephrine 5 mg IV up to 15 doses at 3-minute intervals(N =1677)
Epinephrine 1 mg IV up to 15 doses at 3-minute intervals(M = 1650)
Primary outcome: ROSC, admission to the hospital, number of admissions after a single dose of epinephrine, hospital dischargeSecondary outcomes: survival, neurological outcome by GCS and cerebral performance scale
Significantly more ROSC in high dose group (40% versus 36% of control group,P =0.02) and more survival to admission (26.5% versus 23.6% of controls, P =0.05). No difference in survival to discharge or neurological status
Gueugniaud et al., NEJM 1998 [77]
Vasopressin versus epinephrine for in hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial
Randomized, controlled, triple-blind, multicenter study of in-hospital cardiac arrest for asystole, PEA, or refractory ventricular fibrillation
Vasopressin 40 IU IV (first pressor)(N =104)
Epinephrine 1 mg IV (first pressor)(N =96)
Primary outcome: survival for 1 hourSecondary outcomes: survival to hospital discharge, modified mini-mental state exam at discharge, cerebral performance score at discharge, ROSC, adverse events
No difference in survival at 1 hour or survival to hospital discharge. No difference in mini-mental state exam scores or cerebral performance scores
Stiell et al.,Lancet 2001 [78]
A comparison of vasopressin and epinephrine for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Randomized, controlled, multicenter study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation failing defibrillation, PEA, or asystole
Vasopressin 40 IU IV × 2 doses maximum(N =589)
Epinephrine 1 mg IV × 2 doses maximum(N =597)
Primary outcome: survival to hospital admissionSecondary outcomes: survival to hospital discharge, cerebral performance score in survivors
No difference in survival to admission among patients with ventricular fibrillation or PEA. Higher rates of hospital admission for asystole in vasopressin group (29% versus 20%,P =0.02) and hospital discharge (4.7% versus 1.5% with epinephrine, P =0.04). Patients who received rescue epinephrine after vasopressin had better survival to admission and discharge than the epinephrine alone group. No difference in cerebral performance
Wenzel et al.,NEJM 2004 [79]
Vasopressin and epinephrine versus epinephrine alone in cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Randomized, controlled, multicenter trial
Epinephrine 1 mg IV + Vasopressin 40 IU IV(N =1442)
Epinephrine 1 mg IV + Placebo(N =1452)
Primary outcome: Survival to hospital admissionSecondary outcomes: ROSC, survival to hospital discharge, good neurological recovery by cerebral performance scale, and GCS, 1-year survival
No differences in survival to admission, ROSC, survival to discharge, 1-year survival, or good neurologic recovery
Gueugniaud et al., NEJM 2008 [80]
Magnesium
Randomised trial of magnesium in in-hospital cardiac arrest (MAGIC trial)
Randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center study of cardiac arrest in the ICU or general ward
Magnesium 2 g IV bolus then 8 g over 24 hours(N =76)
Placebo(N =80)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: 24-hour survival, survival to hospital discharge, GCS, and discharge Karnofsky
No difference in ROSC, 24-hour survival, survival to discharge, or GCS
Thel et al.,Lancet 1997 [81]
Magnesium in cardiac arrest (the MAGIC trial)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
MgSO4 5 g IV × 1 (N =31)
Placebo(N =36)
Primary outcome: ECG rhythm 2 minutes after drug, ROSCSecondary outcomes: survival to ED, ICU, and hospital discharge
No differences in ROSC or survival
Fatovich et al., Resuscitation 1997 [82]
Magnesium sulfate in the treatment of refractory ventricular fibrillation in the prehospital setting
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of prehospital ventricular fibrillation refractory to 3 shocks
MgSO4 2 g IV × 1 (N =58)
Placebo(N =58)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: admission to hospital, hospital discharge
No difference in ROSC, survival to admission or discharge
Allegra et al.,Resuscitation 2001 [83]
A randomized trial to investigate the efficacy of magnesium sulphate for refractory ventricular fibrillation
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ventricular fibrillation refractory to 3 shocks
MgSO4 2–4 g IV × 1 (N =52)
Placebo(N =53)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcome: hospital discharge
No differences in ROSC or survival to discharge
Hassan et al.,Emerg Med J 2002 [84]
Randomized clinical trial of magnesium, diazepam, or both after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled factorial design study
Tier 1: magnesium 2 g IV + placebo(N =75)Tier 2: diazepam 10 mg IV + placebo (N =75) Tier 3: magnesium 2 g IV + Diazepam 10 g IV (N =75)
Placebo only(N =75)
Primary outcome: awakening at 3 months (comprehensible speech and command following)Secondary outcome: days to awakening, days to death, independent at 3 months
No difference in neurological outcome between the 3 groups
Longstreth et al., Neurology 2002 [85]
Insulin
Intravenous glucose after out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: a community-based randomized trial
Randomized, single-center controlled study
5% dextrose (D5W) infusion(N =374)
0.45 saline infusion(N =374)
Primary outcome: command following or comprehensible speechSecondary outcomes: survival to hospital admission and discharge
No difference in neurological outcomes, or survival to admission or discharge
Longstreth et al., Neurology 1993 [86]
Strict versus moderate glucose control after resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation
Randomized, controlled, multicenter study of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest
Strict glucose control (4–6 mmol/L) with insulin infusion × 48 hours(N =39)
Moderate glucose control (6–8 mmol/L) with insulin infusion × 48 hours(N =51)
Primary outcome: 30-day all-cause mortality after ROSCSecondary outcomes: neuron-specific enolase levels at 24 and 48 hours
No difference in 30-day mortality
Oksanen et al., Intensive Care Med 2007 [87]
Hypothermia
Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia
Randomized, controlled, single-blind, prospective study
Hypothermia 33°C × 12 h(N =43)
Normothermia 37°C(N =34)
Primary outcome: discharge dispositionSecondary outcomes: adverse events, hemodynamic parameters
Good discharge disposition in 49% of treatment group compared to 26% of normothermia group (P =0.046). No difference in adverse events
Bernard et al., NEJM 2002 [88]
Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest
Randomized, controlled, single-blind, multicenter, prospective study
Hypothermia 32–34°C × 24 h(N =137)
Normothermia 37°C(N =138)
Primary outcome: 6 month neurologic outcome using Pittsburgh cerebral performance scaleSecondary outcome: 6-month mortality, complications at 7 days
Hypothermia group had more favorable neurological outcome at 6 months (55% versus 39% of normothermia group,P =0.009). Less death in hypothermia group (41% versus 55% in normothermia group, P =0.02). No difference in complication rates
The hypothermia after cardiac arrest study group, NEJM 2002 [89]
Pilot randomized clinical trial of prehospital induction of mild hypothermia in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with a rapid infusion of 4 degrees C normal saline
Randomized, controlled, safety and feasibility study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
2 L 4°C normal saline infusion(N =63)
Standard care(N =62)
Primary outcome: esophageal temperature, adverse eventsSecondary outcomes: awakening, hospital discharge
Significant differences in temperature between groups (P <0.001). No difference in awakening or hospital discharge
Kim et al.,Circulation 2007 [90]
Prehospital therapeutic hypothermia for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial
Randomized controlled trail of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
4°C Ringers solution 30 mL/kg to target temperature 33°C(N =19)
Conventional fluid therapy(N =18)
Primary outcome: nasopharyngeal temperatureSecondary outcomes: hospital mortality and cerebral performance scale
Lower core temperature in the treatment group (P <0.001). No difference in safety, mortality, or neurologic outcome
KÄmÄrÄinen et al., Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009 [91]
Intra-arrest transnasal evaporative cooling: a randomized, prehospital, multicenter study (PRINCE: pre-rosc intranasal cooling effectiveness)
Randomized, controlled, prospective, single-blind, multicenter study for out-of-hospital arrest
Intra-arrest intranasal cooling with RhinoChill device + cooling at hospital arrival to 34°C(N =93)
Standard care with cooling at hospital arrival to 34°C(N =101)
Primary Outcome: adverse events, length of stay, mechanical ventilation days, ROSC, survival to discharge, discharge Pittsburgh cerebral performance scale.
Time to target temperature was shorter in the intranasal cooling group (P =0.03). No difference in ROSC, survival of admitted patients, or neurologic outcome at discharge
Castrén et al., Circulation 2010 [92]
Chest compressions
A comparison of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrests occurring in the hospital
Randomized, controlled, single center study
CPR using suction device (Ambu CardioPump)(N =29)
Standard CPR(N =33)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: 24-hour survival, hospital discharge, GCS at 24 hours
ROSC occurred in 62% of treatment group versus 30% of control group (P <0.03) and 45% of treatment group survived 24 hours compared to 9% of control group (P <0.004). GCS at 24 hours was better in the treatment group (P <0.02)
Cohen et al.,NEJM 1993 [93]
The Ontario Trial of Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for In-Hospital andPrehospital Cardiac Arrest
Randomized, single-blind, multicenter controlled trial of prehospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest
Active compression-decompression CPR using a suction device(N =906)
Standard CPR(N =878)
Primary outcome: survival for 1 hourSecondary outcome: survival to hospital discharge, modified mini-mental state exam, cerebral performance scale
No differences in survival at 1 hour, survival until hospital discharge or mini-mental state exam for either prehospital or in-hospital arrest
Stiell et al.,JAMA 1996 [94]
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by chest compression alone or with mouth-to-mouth ventilation
Randomized controlled study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Bystander chest compression plus mouth to mouth resuscitation(N =279)
Bystander chest compressions alone(N =241)
Primary outcome: survival to hospital dischargeSecondary outcomes: admission to the hospital, neurological status
Similar outcome with bystander chest compressions alone versus chest compressions with mouth to mouth
Hallstrom et al.,NEJM 2000 [95]
Constant flow insufflations of oxygen as the sole mode of ventilation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, controlled study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Constant flow insufflations of oxygen(N =487)
Standard endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation(N =457)
Primary outcome: survival to ICU dischargeSecondary outcomes: ROSC, survival to hospital admission, spO2 > 70%
No difference in ROSC, hospital admission or ICU discharge. Higher O2 sats in continuous flow insufflation group
Bertrand et al., Intensive Care Med 2006 [96]
Compression-only CPR or standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, controlled, multicenter study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Compression only CPR(N =620)
Standard CPR(N =656)
Primary outcome: 30 day survivalSecondary outcomes: 1 day survival, ROSC, survival to hospital discharge
Similar 30-day survival, 1-day survival and survival to hospital discharge
Svensson et al.,NEJM 2010 [97]
CPR with chest compression alone or with rescue breathing
Randomized, controlled, multicenter study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Chest compressions alone(N =981)
Chest Compressions + Rescue breathing (2 breaths to 15 chest compressions)(N =960)
Primary outcome: survival to hospital dischargeSecondary outcomes: discharge cerebral performance Score, ROSC
No difference in survival to hospital discharge or in neurologic outcome. Trend toward improved survival at discharge in those with cardiac cause of arrest and shockable rhythm (P =0.09)
Rea et al.,NEJM 2010 [98]
A trial of an impedance threshold device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, controlled, double-blinded, multicenter study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Impedance threshold device (ITD) which increasing negative intrathoracic pressure and improves cardiac output(N =4373)
Sham ITD(N =4345)
Primary outcome: survival to hospital discharge with mRS 0–3Secondary outcomes: survival to ED admission, hospital admission and hospital discharge, adverse events
No difference in survival with good mRS
Aufderheide et al., NEJM 2011 [99]
Adenosine antagonist
Aminophylline in bradyasystolic cardiac arrest: a randomized placebo-controlled trial
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study of asystole and PEA arrest unresponsive to epinephrine and atropine
Aminophylline 250 mg(N =486)
Placebo(N =485)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: duration of ROSC, survival to admission, survival to discharge, length of stay, 24-hour tachyarrhythmias, 24-hour seizures, 1-year neurologic outcome by GCS, Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral and overall performance scales, modified mini-mental state exam, functional status questionnaire
No difference in ROSC. More tachyarrhythmias in the treatment group. Survival to hospital admission and survival to discharge were not different
Abu-Laban et al., Lancet 2006 [100]
Fluid management
Capillary leakage in postcardiac arrest survivors during therapeutic hypothermia: a prospective, randomized study
Randomized, controlled study
7.2% hypertonic saline with 6% poly starch solution × 24 hours(N =10)
Standard Fluid (Ringer’s acetate) × 24 hours(N =9)
Primary outcome: amount of fluid administered in 24 hoursSecondary outcome: MRI vasogenic edema
The treatment group required significantly less fluid than the control group. There was no difference in MRI brain edema
Heradstveit et al., Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2010 [101]
Barbiturate
Randomized clinical study of thiopental loading in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest
Randomized, controlled, multicenter study
Thiopental 30 mg/kg IV load(N =131)
Standard therapy (N =131)
Primary outcome: Pittsburgh cerebral Performance scale at 6 and 12 monthsSecondary outcomes: best neurological performance ever obtained during followup, time to recovery
No difference in neurological outcome or mortality between groups
Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial I Study Group.NEJM 1986 [102]
Calcium
Calcium chloride: reassessment of use in asystole
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in prehospital asystolic cardiac arrest refractory to epinephrine, bicarbonate, and atropine
Calcium chloride(N =18)
Placebo(N =14)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcome: hospital discharge
No difference in ROSC
Stueven et al.,Ann Emerg Med 1984 [103]
The effectiveness of calcium chloride in refractory electromechanical dissociation
Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study of prehospital PEA arrest refractory to epinephrine and bicarbonate
Calcium chloride(N =48)
Placebo(N =42)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: survival to hospital discharge
No difference in ROSC but subgroup of patients with widened QRS did have more ROSC in calcium group (P =0.028)
Stueven et al.,Ann Emerg Med 1985 [104]
Lack of effectiveness ofcalcium chloride in refractory asystole
Randomized, blinded, placebo controlledstudy of prehospital asystolic cardiac arrest refractory to epinephrine, bicarbonate, and atropine
Calcium chloride(N =39)
Placebo(N =34)
Primary outcome:ROSC Secondary outcomes: survival to hospital discharge
No difference in ROSC or hospital discharge
Stueven et al.,Ann Emerg Med 1985 [105]
Sodium bicarbonate
Buffer therapy during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of out-of-hospital asystole or ventricular fibrillation refractory to first defibrillation attempt
Sodium bicarbonate 250 mL IV × 1(N =245)
Placebo(N =257)
Primary outcome: survival to ICU admission, survival to hospital discharge
No difference in survival to ICU admission or hospital discharge
Dybvik et al.,Resuscitation 1995 [106]
Sodium bicarbonate improves outcome in prolonged prehospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of prehospital cardiac arrest
Sodium bicarbonate (1 meq/kg) IV × 1(N =175)
Placebo(N =155)
Primary outcome: survival to EDSecondary outcomes: ROSC
No difference in survival to ED admission or ROSC. Better survival with bicarbonate in the prolonged (>15 minute) arrest group (P =0.007)
Vukmir and Katz,Am J Emerg Med2006 [107]
Hemofiltration
High-volume hemofiltration after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized study
Randomized, controlled trial of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation or asystole cardiac arrest
Tier 1: hemofiltration (200 mL/kg/h) over 8 hours(N =20) Tier 2: hemofiltration plus hypothermia to 32°C × 24 hours(N =22)
Standard care(N =19)
Primary outcome: survival at 6 monthsSecondary outcome: intractable shock, Pittsburgh cerebral performance scale
Significantly better survival compared to control in hemofiltration group (P =0.026) and hemofiltration plus hypothermia group (P =0.018). No difference in 6-month neurologic outcome
Laurent et al.,J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 [108]
Rhythm analysis
Early versus later rhythm analysis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Cluster randomized, controlled, multicenter study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Early rhythm analysis: 30–60 seconds of EMS CPR followed by ECG analysis(N =5290)
Later rhythm analysis: 180 seconds of EMS CPR followed by ECG analysis(N =4643)
Primary outcome: survival to hospital discharge with mRS 0–3Secondary outcomes: survival to discharge, survival to hospital admission, ROSC
No difference in outcome between a brief and longer period of CPR before ECG analysis of rhythm
Stiell et al.,NEJM 2011 [109]Table 3
Randomized controlled trials assessing neurologic outcomes after aneurysmal Subarachnoid hemorrhage—ongoing trials.
Trial name
Study design
Treatment group
Control group
Target enrollment
Outcome measure
PI
Comments
Statins
Statins and cerebral blood flow in SAH
Randomized, double-blind efficacy study
Simvastatin 80 mg/d for 21 days
Placebo
60
Primary outcome: resting CBF and autoregulation 7–10 days after SAHSecondary outcomes: OEF and CMRO2 7–10 days after SAH
Michael Diringer,NCT00795288
Uses PET to understand the mechanism of statin use in vasospasm
The role of statins in preventing cerebral vasospasm secondary to subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, double-blind, parallel assignment
Simvastatin 80 mg PO qd × 21 days
Placebo
80
Primary outcome: 6-month clinical outcome
Eberval Figueiredo,NCT01346748
—
Use of simvastatin for the prevention of vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, double-blind, parallel assignment efficacy trial
Tier 1: Simvastatin 40 mg × 21 d orTier 2:Simvastatin 80 mg × 21 d
Placebo
150
Primary outcome:21-day GOS, mRS, and Barthel IndexSecondary outcome: clinical vasospasm
Ben Roitberg,NCT00487461
—
High-dose simvastatin for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (HDS-SAH)
Randomized, parallel assignment, double-blind efficacy study
Simvastatin 80 mg PO × 21 days
Simvastatin 40 mg PO × 21 days
240
Primary outcome:delayed ischemic neurological deficit Secondary Outcomes: LFTs, rhabdomyolysis, 3-month mRS, cost effectiveness
George Wong, NCT01077206
There may be a biochemical and neuroprotective dose-related relationship between simvastatin and delayed ischemic neurological deficits.
Simvastatin in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (STASH):a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III trial
Simvastatin 40 mg PO qd × 21 days
Placebo
1600
Primary outcome: 6-month mRSSecondary outcome: need and intensity of delayed ischemic deficit rescue therapy, incidence and duration of delayed ischemic deficits, incidence and severity of sepsis, length of stay, discharge disposition
Peter Kirkpatrick,NCT00731627
Simvastatin may improve CBF and inflammation following SAH
Aneurysm repair
International subarachnoid aneurysm trial II comparing clinical outcomes of Surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms not included in the original ISAT study (ISAT II)
Randomized, open label, safety/efficacy study of WFNS I–IV
Surgical Clipping
Endovascular Coiling
1724
Primary outcome: 12-month mRS > 2Secondary outcomes: ICH following treatment, failure of aneurysm occlusion, all cause morbidity and mortality, aneurysm recurrence, hospitalization > 20 days or discharge other than home, aneurysm rebleed
Tim Darsaut, Max Findlay, and Jean Raymond,NCT01668563
ISAT included primarily small anterior circulation aneurysms. The optimal treatment of other locations and sizes of aneurysms remains unclear and coiling may not be as durable as clipping
Lipid peroxidation inhibitor
Acetaminophen in aSAH to inhibit lipid peroxidation and cerebral vasospasm
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety/efficacy trial
Group1: Acetaminophen 1 g q 6Group 2: NAC IV 0.5 g/h Group 3: Acetaminophen 1 g q6 + NAC 0.5 g/h Group 4: Acetaminophen 1.5 g q 6 + NAC 0.5 g/h
Placebo
120
Primary outcome: F2-IsoP biomarkers for lipid peroxidation.Secondary outcome: vasospasm and brain ischemia as assessed by CTA/CTP or MRI DWI
John Oates,NCT00585559
Hemoglobin released from lysed RBCs oxidizes and generates protein radicals that induce lipid peroxidation. Metabolites of peroxidations (F2-isoprostanes) are potent vasoconstrictors. Acetaminophen can inhibit these metabolites and NAC can inhibit lipid peroxidation
Neuroprotective drugs
Effects of tiopronin on 3-aminopropanal level and neurologic outcome after aneurysmal SAH
Randomized, double-blind, phase 2bioavailability
Tiopronin
Placebo
60
Primary outcome: serum and CSF 3AP levelsSecondary outcomes: 12 month mRS, Barthel, Lawton, NIHSS, TICS adverse events
E Sander Connolly,NCT01095731
3AP is toxic metabolite produced during cerebral ischemia. It is neutralized by tiopronin
Lycopene following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (LASH)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy study
Lycopene 30 mg PO qd × 21 days
Placebo
124
Primary outcome: TCD vasospasm, duration of impaired autoregulation measured by TCDSecondary Outcomes: LDL, oxy-LDL, CRP, circulating endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells
Karol Budohoski,NCT00905931
Lycopene is a natural antioxidant that may reduce vascular injury and inflammation and limit vasospasm
Thrombolytics
Intraventricular tPA in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind safety trail
tPA intraventricular q 12 h × 5 doses
Placebo administered q 12 h × 5 doses
12
Primary outcome: HCT rate and variance of ventricular and cisternal clot clearanceSecondary outcome: hemorrhagic complications, ventriculostomy-related infections, TCD vasospasm, CT angio vasospasm, symptomatic vasospasm, CSF cytokines and coagulation measurements, ICP, fever burden, volume of CSF drainage, 6-month GOSE and EuroQOL
Andreas Kramer,NCT01098890
Intraventricular TPA may accelerate clearance of IVH ameliorating vasospasm, hydrocephalus, and ICP
Transfusion
Effect of red blood cell transfusion on brain metabolism in patients with SAH
Open label safety/efficacy study in SAH patients with Hgb < 12.5 g/dL and DCI, high risk for vasospasm or angiographic vasospasm
Transfusion of 1 unit of packed RBC over 1 hour
NA
48
Primary outcome: percent of brain regions with low oxygen delivery before and 1 hour after transfusionSecondary outcomes: relationship of oxygen delivery and angiographic vasospasm
Michael Diringer, NCT00968227
Uses PET to assess the relationship between Hct and oxygen delivery in SAH patients
Vasodilators
Sildenafil for prevention of cerebral vasospasm (SIPCEVA)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety and efficacy study
Tier 1: sildenafil 25 mg PO TID day 3–14 after SAHTier 2: sildenafil 50 mg PO TID day 3–14 after SAH
Placebo
18
Primary outcome: New neurological deficit due to vasospasm up to 14 days after SAHSecondary outcomes: TCD spasm, mortality, adverse drug effects, length of stay, discharge mRS
Andre Cerutti Franciscatto,NCT01091870
—
Safety study of dantrolene in SAH
Randomized, double-blind safety study
Dantrolene
Placebo
30
Primary outcome: tolerability, hyponatremiaSecondary outcomes: liver toxicity, hemodynamics, ICP, TCD, angiographic vasospasm treatments, 90-day GOS, mRS, and Barthel
Susanne Muehlschlegel,NCT01024972
Dantrolene is a muscle relaxant that may ameliorate vascular muscle tone and limit vasospasm
Safety and pharmacokinetic evaluation of nitrite for prevention of cerebral vasospasm
Randomized, single-blind, parallel assignment safety study
Tier 1:sodium nitrite 32 nmol/kg/min Tier 2: sodium nitrite 48 nmol/kg/min Tier 3: sodium nitrite 64 nmol/kg/min
Placebo vehicle
18
Primary outcome: pharmacokinetics of 14-day sodium nitrite infusionSecondary outcomes: safety and efficacy
Edward Oldfield,NCT00873015
—
Effects of prostacyclin infusion on cerebral vessels and metabolism in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, parallel assignment, pharmacodynamics study
Tier 1:prostacyclin 1 ng/kg/min day 5–10 after SAH Tier 2: prostacyclin 2 ng/kg/min day 5–10 after SAH
Placebo, IV infusion day 5–10 after SAH
90
Primary outcome: vasospasm measured by CT perfusionSecondary outcomes: cerebral metabolism measured by microdialysis, 3-month GOS, clinical vasospasm, brain tissue oxygen, CT angio vasospasm, MAP, serum S100b
Rune Rasmussen, NCT01447095
Prostacyclin may cause vasodilation and ameliorate vasospasm
Hypertensive, hypervolemic therapy
Induced hypertension for treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal SAHHIMALAIA
Randomized, Single blind safety/efficacy study of patients with SAH and DCI (clinically defined)
Induced hypertension with vasopressors and fluids for 48 hours
No induced hypertension
240
Primary outcome: mRS at 3 monthsSecondary outcomes: proportion of treated patients who did not have clinical improvement of DCI symptoms within 24 hours, 30-day mortality, 3-month Barthel, SSQoL, hospital anxiety and depression scale, cognitive failures questionnaire, hospital complications, CTP results, medical costs
Arjen Slooter and Walter van den Bergh,NCT01613235
CBF measured in all patients using CTP at enrollment and 24–36 hours
Intensive management of pressure and volume expansion in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (IMPROVES)
Randomized, single-blind, factorial assignment
Tier 1: hypervolemia + conventional blood pressureTier 2: normovolemia + hypertension Tier 3: hypervolemia + hypertension
Normal volume, normal blood pressure
20
Primary outcome: achievement of hemodynamic goals in each group
Miriam Treggiari,NCT01414894
Though triple H is a common therapy, its safety and efficacy have not been well quantified
CSF diversion
EARLYDRAIN: outcome after early lumbar CSF: drainage in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, 2-arm controlled trial
Continuous lumbar CSF drainage of 120 mg qd × 7 d
Standard NICU care
300
Primary outcome: 6-month mRSSecondary outcomes: 6-month mortality, angiographic vasospasm, TCD vasospasm, shunt insertion rate at 6 months
Bardutzky J,NCT01258257
Lumbar drainage to remove blood from the basal cisterns may limit delayed cerebral ischemia
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage study
Randomized, open label, parallel assignment study of SAH patients requiring external ventricular drainage (EVD)
High volume CSF diversion (EVD at 5 mmHg) × 10 days
Conventional CSF diversion (EVD at 15 mm Hg), weaned at physician discretion
20
Primary outcome: 90-day mRSSecondary Outcome: radiologic infarction, TCD or angiographic vasospasm, shunt placement, ventriculitis, discharge mRS, 90 day mini-mental status exam, length of stay
Giuseppe Lanzino,NCT01420978
More aggressive CSF drainage may improve brain microcirculation and perfusion and lead to better neurological outcomes
Antiepileptics
Comparison of short duration levetiracetam to extended course for seizure prophylaxis after subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, prospective, open label, parallel assignment, phase III, safety/efficacy study
Levetiracetam 1000 mg BID × 3 days
Levetiracetam 1000 mg BID × hospital stay
460
Primary outcome: In hospital seizuresSecondary outcome: Incidence of seizure after hospital discharge, adverse drug reactions, length of stay, cognitive and functional outcomes
Rajat Dhar,NCT01137110
Antiepileptics can have long-term cognitive side effects. A short course may be just as efficacious as prolonged use
Antiepileptic drugs and vascular risk markers
Randomized, open label, parallel assignment study
Tier 1: phenytoin 5 mg/kg/d divided in 2 dosesTier 2: valproate 15 mg/kg/d divided in 3 doses Tier 3: levetiracetam 1000-1500 mg/d divided in 2 doses
No drug intervention
200
Primary outcome: serum cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, HDL, lipoprotein a, CRPSecondary outcome: acute seizures, late seizures, mRS at 8 and 16 weeks
Prema Kishna and Scott Mintzer,NCT00774306
Certain seizure medications may raise cholesterol levels and increase the risk of heart attack and stroke
Sedation
Effects of dexmedetomidine on inflammatory cytokines in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, open label, parallel assignment efficacy study
Dexmedetomidine 0.2–1.5 mcg/kg/h
Propofol 5–80 mcg/kg/min
10
Primary outcome: serum and CSF cytokines over 48 hoursSecondary outcomes: sedative and analgesic requirements, RASS and CAM-ICU scores, length of stay, delayed cerebral ischemia, GOSE at discharge
Shaun Keegan and Brittany Woolf,NCT01565590
Dexmedetomidine may cause less inflammation over time than propofol
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation of patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage
Nonrandomized, open label, parallel assignment
Early multidisciplinary rehab and mobilization
No intervention
160
Primary outcome: 10-week GOSSecondary outcome: 3–6 month and 12-month GOSE, functional independence measure, coma recovery scale, disability rating scale, High-level Mobility Assessment tool, pain score
Tanja Karic and Angelika Sorteberg,NCT01656317
Early rehab may reduce complications and improve physical and cognitive function after SAH
Blood pressure control
Safety and Efficacy Study of Clevidipine to Control Hypertension in Patients Admitted with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (CLASH)
Open label, safety, efficacy study, single group assignment (Phase 2)
Clevidipine IV 2–32 mg/h for 24–48 hours
NA
20
Primary: Blood pressure within target range
Panayiotis Varelas,NCT00978822
To assess how rapidly and safely Clevidipine can be used to control blood pressure in SAH patients.
Other
Cervical spinal cord stimulation for the prevention of cerebral vasospasm
Nonrandomized, open label
Spinal cord stimulation using MTS Trial System 3510
NA
12
Primary outcome: cerebral vasospasmSecondary outcome: adverse events
Konstantin Slavin, NCT00766844
—Table 4
Randomized controlled trials assessing neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest—ongoing trials.
Trial name
Studydesign
Treatmentgroup
Control group
Target enrollment
Outcome measure
PI
Comments
Neuroprotective drugs
Selenium to Improve Neurological Outcome after Cardiac Arrest (SCPR)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, phase 2a efficacy study
Sodium-selenite infusion × 7 days
Placebo
52
Primary outcome: neuron-specific enolaseSecondary outcomes: inflammation and oxidative stress markers, NIHSS and Glasgow Pittsburgh performance score at 6 months, selenium blood levels, glutathione peroxidase plasma levels
Vanessa Stadlbauer and Karlheinz Smolle,NCT01390506
Selenium can reduce oxidative stress after cardiac arrest and reduce inflammation
Magnesium
Clinical Study of the LRS ThermoSuit System in Post Arrest Patients with Intravenous Infusion of Magnesium Sulfate
Randomized, double-blind, parallel assignment, safety/efficacy study of any rhythm
Thermosuit to target 34°C plus magnesium sulfate IV (30 mg/kg over 15 minutes)
ThermoSuit to target 34°C plus placebo (normal saline)
14
Primary outcome: cooling rateSecondary outcomes: time to target temperature, percentage of time in target temperature range, shivering, length of stay, neurologic status at discharge and 6 months, adverse events, survival at 24 hours, discharge and 30 days
Michael Holzer and Andreas Janata, NCT00593164
Tests new device to achieve therapeutic hypothermia and the impact of magnesium on cooling performance and hemodynamics
Hypothermia
Target Temperature Management after Cardiac Arrest (TTM)
Randomized, double-blind, parallel assignment, multicenter, safety/efficacy trial for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Target temperature 36°C × 24 h
Target temperature 33°C × 24 h
850
Primary outcome: All cause mortalitySecondary outcomes: 6-month composite all cause mortality and poor neurological outcome by cerebral performance scale, bleeding, 6-month neurological status and quality of life, mRS, Cerebral performance scale, mini-mental test, IQCODE, SF-36, adverse events
Niklas Nielsen and Hans, Friberg NCT01020916
Attempts to identify optimal hypothermia target temperature
Hypothermia After in-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (HACAinhospital)
Randomized, single-blind, parallel assignment, single-center, safety/efficacy study for in-hospital arrests of any rhythm
Mild therapeutic hypothermia 32–34°C × 24 hours.
Standard care, no hypothermia
440
Primary outcome: all cause mortality at 6 monthsSecondary outcomes: 6 month Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance scale, in-hospital all-cause mortality
Sebastian Wolfrum and Volkhard Kurowski,NCT00457431
Tests whether hypothermia treatment will improve outcome after in-hospital arrest of any rhythm
Intra-arrest Therapeutic Hypothermia in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest (HITUPPAC-BIO)
Randomized, open label, parallel assignment, efficacy trial
Hypothermia induction prehospital
Hypothermia induction at hospital arrival
250
Primary outcomes: brain injury biomarkers at 72 hSecondary outcomes: ROSC, survival 72 h, GCS at 48 hours, cerebral performance scale at 28 days
Guillaume Debaty Jean Francois Timsit, NCT00886184
Assess utility of early hypothermia prehospital
Induction of Mild Hypothermia Following Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Randomized, open label, single group assignment, efficacy study of any rhythm out of hospital arrest
Rapid infusion of 2 L of 4°C normal saline prior to ED arrival
Standard therapy
1364
Primary outcome: awake and command following at hospital dischargeSecondary outcomes: days to awakening, days to death, 3 month neurological outcome
Francis Kim,NCT00391469
Tests whether rapid induction of hypothermia with cold saline infusion is efficacious
Comparing Therapeutic Hypothermia Using External and Internal Cooling for Post-Cardiac Arrest Patients
Randomized, open label, parallel assignment, efficacy trial
External device (Arctic Sun) induced hypothermia
Internal device (Alsius) induced hypothermia
51
Primary outcome: Survival to hospital dischargeSecondary outcome: 1 year neurological status
Marcus Ong, NCT00827957
Identifying the most efficient method of cooling may improve outcome after cardiac arrest
Hypothermia + ECMO
Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Treated with Mechanical CPR, Hypothermia, ECMO and Early Reperfusion (CHEER)
Nonrandomized, single group, open label, safety/efficacy trail for patients who fail standard resuscitation
Automated CPR, ECMO, coronary angiography, therapeutic hypothermia
NA
24
Primary outcome: survival to hospital dischargeSecondary outcomes: cerebral performance Scale, time to ECMO insertion, neurologic biomarkers, cardiac recovery
Stephen Bernard and Dion Stub, NCT01186614
Aggressive resuscitation may improve outcome in patients who fail standard resuscitation
Hyperinvasive approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using mechanical chest compression device, prehospital intraarrest cooling, extracorporeal Life support and early Invasive assessment compared to standard of care: Prague OHCA Study
Randomized, open-label, parallel group, safety/efficacy study
Prehospital mechanical compression device, intraarrest cooling and in hospital ECLS (compression device, Rhinochill, PLS ECMO)
Standard care
170
Primary outcome: composite endpoint of survival with good neurological outcome (cerebral performance scale)Secondary outcome: 30 day cerebral performance scale, 30 day cardiac recovery
Jan Belohlavek and Ondrej Smid,NCT01511666
Aggressive, early intervention may improve cerebral outcomes
Emergency Preservation and Resuscitation (EPR) for Cardiac Arrest from Trauma (EPR-CAT)
Nonrandomized, open label, parallel assignment, safety/efficacy study
Profound hypothermia < 10°C with cold saline infusion into aorta followed by resuscitation/rewarming with cardiopulmonary bypass
Standard treatment
20
Primary outcome: survival to hospital discharge without major disability by GOSESecondary outcomes: achieving target temperature in 1 hour, 28 day survival, 6 month neurological function, multiple organ system dysfunction
Samuel Tisherman,NCT01042015
Resuscitation technique for trauma patients that have arrested from exsanguination
HypotherMia + xenon
Effect of xenon and therapeutic hypothemia on brain and on neuroloigcal outcome following brain ischemia in cardiac arrest patients (Xe-hypotheca)
Randomzied, open label, parallel assignment, phase 2 safety/efficacy trial for ventricular fibrillation and nonperfusing ventricular tachycardia
Hypothermia 33°C × 24 h and Xenon inhalation × 24 hours target end tidal 40%
Hypothermia 33°C × 24 h
110
Primary outcome: PET and MRI ischemia at 24 hours and 10 daysSecondary outcomes: neurological outcome at 6 months, TTE
Timo Laitio,NCT00879892
Xenon may be synergistically neuroprotective in combination with hypothermia post arrest by limiting cerebral hypoxia, neuronal loss, and mitochondrial dysfunction
Chest compresions
Continuous chest compressions
Randomized, open label, multicenter, crossover assignment study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of any rhythm
Continuous chest compressions
Interrupted chest compressions with ventilation 30 : 2
23600
Primary outcome: survival to hospital dischargeSecondary outcomes: mRS at discharge, adverse events
Myron Weisfeldt,NCT01372748
Continuous CPR without interruption for ventilation may be superior to interrupted compression with ventilation ratio of 30 : 2
LUCAS chest compressor versus manual chest compression in out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest: LUCAT trial
Randomized, open label, parallel assignment, efficacy study
Mechanical continuous chest compressions performed by LUCAS device
Manual chest compressions
400
Primary outcome: survival to hospital admission, survival to discharge with good neurological state by cerebral performance ScaleSecondary outcomes: ROSC, end tidal CO2, SOFA scale, length of stay, metabolic and inflammatory markers, LV function
Francesc Carmona Jimenez, Rosa-Maria Lidon,NCT01521208
Mechanical chest compression may be superior to manual chest compression
Cerebral oxygenation
Cerebral Oxygenation in Cardiac Arrest and Hypothermia
Open label, safety and efficacy study
Near-infrared monitoring
Standard therapy, no monitoring
70
Primary outcome: survival to dischargeSecondary outcomes: cerebral performance scale at discharge and 12 months
Christian Storm, NCT01531426
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) could be a new-noninvasive marker for outcome after cardiac arrest. Low NIRS may correlate with poor outcome


### 3.2. Interventions Studied

The main hypothetical mechanisms of intervention tested in published SAH trials were related to treating or preventing delayed cerebral ischemia (N=40, 70%), preventing aneurysm rebleeding (N=5, 9%), improving aneurysm repair technique (N=5, 9%), improving fluid balance (N=2, 4%), and others (N=3, 5%). Among ongoing SAH trials, mechanisms of study include treating or preventing delayed cerebral ischemia (N=19, 76%), limiting rebleeding (N=1, 4%), improving aneurysm repair (N=1, 4%), seizure control (N=2, 8%), and other (N=2, 8%). There are no published or ongoing SAH clinical trials that focus on treating acute brain injury after aneurysm rupture.Conversely, the main mechanisms of intervention studied inpublishedcardiac arrest trials focused on acute intervention to treat and limit early brain injury. All 46 (100%) published cardiac arrest trials focused on the acute time frame (first few hours) after cardiac arrest. Interventions studied included decreasing cerebral metabolic demand with hypothermia or barbiturate (N=6, 13%), high-quality chest compressions or pressor use to return cerebral blood flow (N=16, 35%), electrolyte/metabolic optimization with calcium, magnesium, sodium bicarbonate or insulin administration (N=12, 26%), neuroprotective drugs including calcium channel blockers (N=5, 11%), thrombolysis to treat the underlying cause of cardiac arrest (N=2, 4%) and other (N=5, 11%). Among ongoing cardiac arrest trials, mechanisms of study include decreasing cerebral metabolic demand with hypothermia (N=9, 64%), high-quality chest compressions to return cerebral blood flow (N=2, 14%) electrolyte/metabolic optimization with magnesium (N=1, 7%), neuroprotective drugs (N=1, 7%), and monitoring cerebral oxygenation (N=1, 7%). A detailed list of interventions from published and ongoing studies in both the SAH and cardiac arrest population are listed in Table 5.Table 5
Number of randomized, controlled trials published and ongoing for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and cardiac arrest.
Intervention
SAH
Cardiac arrest
PublishedN (%)
OngoingN (%)
PublishedN (%)
OngoingN (%)
Calcium channel blockers
10 (18)
0
4 (9)
0
Antifibrinolytics
5 (9)
0
0
0
Neuroprotective drugs
5 (9)
2 (8)
1 (2)
1 (7)
Statins
4 (7)
5 (20)
0
0
Aneurysm clip or coil
4 (7)
1 (4)
NA
NA
Lipid peroxidation inhibitor
4 (7)
1 (4)
0
0
Thrombolytics
3 (5)
1 (4)
2 (4)
0
Antiplatelets
3 (5)
0
0
0
Steroids
3 (5)
0
1 (2)
0
Transfusion/blood products/erythropoietin
3 (5)
1 (4)
0
0
Vasodilators
3 (5)
4 (16)
0
0
Pressors or HHH
2 (4)
2 (8)
9 (19.5)
0
Magnesium
2 (4)
0
5 (11)
1 (7)
Rho-kinase inhibitor (fasudil)
2 (4)
0
0
0
Adrenergic blockade
1 (2)
0
0
0
Endovascular therapy
1 (2)
0
NA
NA
Insulin/glucose control
1 (2)
0
2 (4)
0
Hypothermia
1 (2)
0
5 (11)
9 (64)
CSF diversion
0
2 (8)
0
0
Antiepileptics
0
2 (8)
0
0
Sedation
0
1 (4)
0
0
Rehabilitation
0
1 (4)
0
0
Blood pressure
0
1 (4)
0
0
Other
0
1 (4)
0
0
Chest compressions
NA
NA
7 (15)
2 (14)
Adenosine antagonist
0
0
1 (2)
0
Fluid management
0
0
1 (2)
0
Barbiturate
0
0
1 (2)
0
Cerebral oxygenation
0
0
0
1 (7)
Calcium chloride
0
0
3 (7)
0
Sodium bicarbonate
0
0
2 (4)
0
Hemofiltration
0
0
1 (2)
0
Rhythm analysis
0
0
1 (2)
0
Total
57
25
46
14


### 3.3. Outcome Measures

The most common neurological outcomes assessed in the SAH trials were delayed cerebral ischemia (N=24, 42%), functional outcome (Glasgow outcome scale, modified Rankin scale or functional outcome scale, N=24, 42%), angiographic or transcranial Doppler vasospasm (N=6, 11%), and death (N=4, 7%). Among cardiac arrest trials, the most often assessed neurological outcomes were the Pittsburgh cerebral performance score (N=18, 40%), Glasgow outcome score or modified Rankin Score (N=4, 9%), Glasgow coma score (N=4, 9%), awakening and command following (N=3, 7%), cognitive or neuropsychological testing (N=1, 2%), “disability” (N=1, 2%), death (N=13, 30%), discharge disposition (N=1, 2%) and others (N=1, 2%).


### 3.4. Trial Results

Of the clinical trials reviewed for SAH, 30% (17/57) showed that the intervention tested had a statistically significant impact on neurological outcome or mortality. These include studies of nimodipine [4–6, 8, 110], phase II data for nicardipine implants during aneurysm clipping [13], the neuroprotectants edavarone [21] and nizofenone [20], pravastatin [25], early aneurysm surgery [28], endovascular coiling [29–31], cilostazol [41], methylprednisolone [44], erythropoietin [45], and fasudil [57, 58]. Similarly, 30% (17/57) of studies showed a positive impact on delayed cerebral ischemia, infarction, angiographic or TCD vasospasm, though there was incomplete overlap with the above studies that showed outcome benefit. Eight studies found both a significant improvement in delayed cerebral ischemia/vasospasm/infarction and outcome including studies of nimodipine [4, 6, 8], nicardipine implants in the basal cistern [13], edavarone [21], pravastatin [25], fasudil [57], and erythropoietin [45]. Nine studies found a benefit for decreasing delayed cerebral ischemia/vasospasm/infarction but no neurologic outcome benefit including studies of IV nicardipine [10, 11], eicosapentaenoic acid (omega-3 fatty acid) [22], the neuroprotectant NA-1 [23], simvastatin [24], tirilazad [34], intracisternal rTPA [36, 38], and clazosentan [49, 50]. Three studies found improved neurologic outcome despite an insignificant effect on delayed cerebral ischemia/vasospasm/infarction including studies of cilostazol [41], methylprednisolone [44], and fasudil [58].Among the cardiac arrest trials, 13% (6/46) demonstrated neurologic or mortality benefit. Improved mortality rates were demonstrated with mild therapeutic hypothermia [89], coenzyme Q10 [68], vasopressin plus epinephrine plus methylprednisolone [71], active compression-decompression CPR [93], and hemofiltration [108].  Improved neurological outcome was demonstrated with early mild therapeutic hypothermia for ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia arrests [88, 89], and one study of active compression-decompression CPR [93], though a larger study of active compression-decompression was negative [94].


### 3.5. Trial Overlap

Though nimodipine has demonstrated mortality and functional outcome benefit in SAH [4–6, 8, 110], it has shown no benefit in cardiac arrest trials [64, 65, 67]. Similarly, intracisternal thrombolysis showed some benefit in reducing delayed cerebral ischemia and infarction after SAH [36, 38], but intravenous tenecteplase showed no long-term benefit and, in fact, increased intracranial hemorrhage after cardiac arrest [69, 70]. Neither magnesium [53, 54, 81–85] nor intensive insulin [59, 87] has proven beneficial after SAH or cardiac arrest. Though hypothermia [88, 89] has been the single most effective treatment for cardiac arrest (the number needed to treat to prevent one death is 7 and the number needed to treat to produce favorable neurological outcome is 6), it has not proven useful in the context of aneurysm surgery after SAH [60]. There is little mechanistic overlap in ongoing randomized, controlled trials of SAH and cardiac arrest patients.


## 3.1. Trials Analyzed

A total of 142 trials (82 SAH, 60 cardiac arrest) met review criteria. Of these, 103 were published in peer-reviewed journals and 39 were ongoing studies. Fifty-seven published randomized, controlled studies were identified in the SAH population and 46 in the cardiac arrest population. These studies are reviewed in detail in Tables1 and 2. Additionally, 25 ongoing SAH trials and 14 ongoing cardiac trials were reviewed (Tables 3 and 4).Table 1
Randomized controlled trials assessing neurologic outcomes after aneursymal Subarachnoid hemorrhage—completed trials.
Trial name
Study design
Treatment group
Control group
Outcome measure
Results
Reference
Calcium channel blockers—nimodipine
Cerebral Arterial Spasm—a controlled Trial of Nimodipine in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter prospective study of Hunt Hess grade I-II SAH patients
Nimodipine 0.7 mg/kg PO bolus, then 0.35 mg/kg q 4 × 21 days. Starting within 96 h of SAH (N=58)
Placebo (N=63)
Primary outcome: neurological deficit from arterial spasm and severity of neurologic deficit at 21 days
Nimodipine significantly reduced death or severe deficits from spasm at 21 days (2% versus 13% with placebo,P=0.03)
Allen et al., NEJM 1983 [3]
Nimodipine treatment in poor-grade aneurysm patients. Results of a multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial
Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Nimodipine 90 mg PO q 4 h × 21 d (N=91)
Placebo (N=97)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOSSecondary outcomes: delayed ischemic deficits, angiographic vasospasm
Better 3-month GOS in treatment group (29% versus 9% of treatment group,P<0.001). Significantly less delayed cerebral ischemia in treatment group, no difference in angiographic vasospasm
Petruk et al., J Neurosurg 1988 [4]
Controlled study of nimodipine in aneurysm patients treated early after subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of all Hunt-Hess grades within 96 hours of SAH
Nimodipine 60 mg q 4 h PO × 21 days + Nimodipine 200 mcg IV intraoperatively into basal cistern (N=38)
Placebo (N=37)
Primary outcome: mortality, cerebral blood flow measured by Xenon CTSecondary outcomes: 3-month intellectual or neurological deficit
Mortality was lower in the nimodipine group (4% versus 24% with placebo,P<0.05). Nimodipine did not significantly increase cerebral blood flow
Mee et al., Neurosurgery 1988 [5]
Effect of oral nimodipine on cerebral infarction and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: British aneurysm nimodipine trial
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial within 96 h of SAH
Nimodipine 60 mg q 4 PO × 21 d (N=276)
Placebo (N=278)
Primary outcome: 3-month cerebral infarction Secondary outcome: 3-month GOS
Significantly less cerebral infarction in the nimodipine group (22% compared to 33% in placebo,P=0.014). Poor GOS outcomes significantly reduced in nimodipine group at 3-months
Pickard et al., BMJ 1989 [6]
Early aneurysm surgery and preventive Therapy with intravenously administered nimodipine: A multicenter, double-blind, dose-comparison study
Randomized, double-blind, dose-comparison, multicenter study
Nimodipine 2 mg/h IV for 9–15 days(N=101)
Nimodipine 3 mg/h IV for 9–15 days(N=103)
Primary outcome: delayed neurological deficits, adverse drug reactions
No difference in delayed neurological deficits between the two groups
Gilsbach et al., Neurosurgery 1990 [7]
Long-term effects of nimodipine on cerebral infarcts and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and surgery
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled of Hunt-Hess I–III SAH patients
Nimodipine IV 0.5 mcg/kg/min × 7–10 days followed by 60 mg q 4 h PO × 21 days total(N=104)
Placebo (N=109)
Primary outcome: delayed ischemic deterioration and CT infarctsSecondary outcomes: GOS at 1–3 years
Significantly fewer deaths caused by delayed cerebral ischemia in nimodipine group (P=0.01) and fewer cerebral infarcts on CT (P=0.05). No differences in 1–3 year GOS or CT scan
Ohman et al., J Neurosurg 1991 [8]
A randomized outcome study of enteral versus intravenous nimodipine in 171 patients after acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, single-center study
Nimodipine 2 mg/h IV × 10 days then changed to PO × 6 d(N=87)
Nimodipine 60 mg PO q 4 × 16 days(N=84)
Primary outcome: delayed ischemic neurological deficitSecondary outcomes: 12 month GOS, mRS, Karnofsky, MRI infarcts, HRQoL
No difference in delayed ischemic neurological deficits (20% in enteral versus 16% in IV group,P=0.61), no difference in 12-month clinical outcomes
Soppi et al., World Neurosurgery 2012 [9]
Calcium channel blockers—nicardipine
A randomized controlled trial of high-dose intravenous nicardipine in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A report of the cooperative aneurysm study
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study
Nicardipine IV 0.15 mg/kg/h (N=449)
Placebo (N=457)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOSSecondary outcomes: angiographic vasospasm, TCD vasospasm, mortality, disability from vasospasm, symptomatic vasospasm, CT infarction, NIHSS
No difference in 3-month GOS. Less symptomatic vasospasm in treatment group (32% versus 46% in placebo group,P <0.001) and less angiographic vasospasm in treatment group (33% versus 51% of placebo, P <0.01) and less TCD vasospasm (23% versus 49% of placebo, P <0.001)
Haley et al., J Neurosurg 1993 [10, 11]
A randomized trial of two doses of nicardipine in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A report of the cooperative aneurysm study
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study
Nicardipine IV 0.15 mg/kg/h × 14 days(N =184)
Nicardipine IV 0.075 mg/kg/h × 14 days(N =181)
Primary outcome: symptomatic vasospasm, adverse drug events Secondary outcomes: 3-month GOS and NIHSS, mortality, disability due to vasospasm, CT infarction
No difference in symptomatic vasospasm or 3-month outcome. More adverse effects in high-dose nicardipine group
Haley et al., J Neurosurg 1994 [12]
Effect of nicardipine prolonged-release implants on cerebral vasospasm and clinical outcome after severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A prospective, randomized, double-blind phase IIa Study
Randomized, prospective double-blind phase IIa study in clipped SAH patients
Nicardipine prolonged-release implants (10 × 4 mg prolonged release rod shaped polymers) placed in basal cisterns(N =16)
Control-basal cisterns opened and washed out (N =16)
Primary outcome: angiographic vasospasm Secondary outcome: delayed ischemic lesion on HCT, 1-year mRS and NIHSS
Angiographic vasospasm significantly reduced in treatment group (7% versus 73% in controls,P <0.05). No significant difference in CT infarct. Decreased mortality in treatment group (6% versus 38% in control group, P =0.042) and better 1-year mRS and NIHSS (P =0.0001)
Barth et al., Stroke 2007 [13]
Antifibrinolytics
Antifibrinolysis with tranexamic acid in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A consecutive controlled clinical trial
Randomized, placebo-controlled, study
Tranexamic acid 1 g q 4 h IV × 1 week then 1 g q 6 h IV × 1 week then 1.5 g q 6 h PO × 1 week(N =30)
Placebo(N =29)
Primary outcome: recurrent hemorrhage diagnosed by LP, HCT, echoencephalogram or autopsy.Secondary outcome: angiographic vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia, death
Tranexamic acid protected against rebleeding during the first 2 weeks of treatment but also resulted in cerebral ischemic complications
Fodstad et al., Neurosurgery 1981 [14]
Comparative clinical trial of epsilon amino-caproic acid and tranexamic acid in the prevention of early recurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized trial
Epsilon amino-caproic acid 6 g q 6 h IV continued until surgery or discharge(N =90)
Tranexamic acid 1 g q 6 h IV continued until surgery or discharge(N =61)
Primary outcome: recurrent hemorrhage diagnosed clinically by HCT, LP, or autopsy Secondary outcome: delayed ischemic deficit diagnosed by clinical deterioration, angiographic vasospasm, and infarct on HCT
Rebleeding occurred in 8% of aminocaproic-acid-treated patients and 10% of tranexamic acid treated patients. Delayed ischemic deficits occurred in 7% of aminocaproic acid patients and 5% of tranexamic acid patients. Mortality was 11% in each group.P =NS for all outcomes
Chowdhary and Sayed, JNNP 1981 [15]
Antifibrinolytic treatment in subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study
Tranexamic acid 1 g q 4 h IV × 1 week then 1 g q 6 h IV × 3 weeks(N = 241)
Placebo(N =238)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOSSecondary outcome: neurological deterioration, rebleeding, infarction, hydrocephalus, edema, epilepsy
Rebleeding reduced from 24% in control group to 9% in treatment group (P <0.001), but with concurrent increase in ischemic complications (24% in treatment group versus 15% in placebo, P <0.01). No difference in 3 month GOS
Vermeulen et al., NEJM 1984 [16]
Antifibrinolytic treatment in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized placebo-controlled trial (STAR)
Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized trial within 96 hours of SAH onset in whom aneurysm repair was delayed beyond 48 hours
Tranexamic acid 1 g IV q 4 h × 1 week then 1.5 g PO q 6 h × 2 weeks(N =229)
Placebo(N =233)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOSSecondary outcomes: rebleeding, delayed cerebral ischemia, hydrocephalus, postoperative ischemia
No difference in 3-month GOS. Significant decrease in rebleeding from 33% in placebo group to 19% in treatment group. No difference in delayed cerebral ischemia, hydrocephalus, or postoperative ischemia
Roos, Neurology 2000 [17]
Immediate administration of tranexamic acid and reduced incidence of early rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective randomized study
Randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Tranexamic acid 1 g IV bolus, then 1 g IV q 6 hours until aneurysm repair or 72 hours post ictus.(N =254)
Placebo(N =251)
Primary outcome: Rebleeding by HCTSecondary outcome: 6 -month GOS, clinical vasospasm/delayed ischemic neurological deficit, TCD spasm
Treatment group had reduced rebleeding rate of 2.4% compared to 10.8% in the placebo group (P <0.01). More favorable outcome in the treatment group (74.8% compared to 70.5% in the control group, P =NS). No increased risk of ischemia
Hillman et al., J Neurosurg 2002 [18]
Neuroprotectives drugs
A double-blind clinical evaluation of the effect of nizofenone on delayed ischemic neurological deficits following aneurysmal rupture
Randomized, placebo controlled trail
Nizofenone for 5–10 days(N =42)
Placebo(N =48)
Primary outcome: delayed ischemic neurological deficits with angiographically confirmed vasospasm.Secondary outcomes: one-month disability index, motor, and speech function
No difference in delayed ischemic events between treatment groups. Among patients with vasospasm, those who received nizofenone had better one-month functional outcomes (P <0.05)
Saito et al., Neurol Res 1983 [19]
Nizofenone administration in the acute stage following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Results of a multicenter controlled double-blind clinical study
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of Hunt Hess grade I–IV
Nizofenone 5 mg × 2 weeks(N =102)
Placebo(N =106)
Primary outcome: neurological exam at 1-month and discharge
Significantly improved one-month or discharge functional outcome in treatment group compared to placebo (P <0.05). No difference in mortality
Ohta et al., J Neurosurg 1986 [20]
Effect of a free radical scavenger, edaravone, in the treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, controlled, single-center study
Edaravone 30 mg IV BID × 14 days(N =49)
Control (usual treatment)(N =42)
Primary outcome: delayed ischemic neurological deficitsSecondary outcomes: cerebral infarction due to vasospasm, 3-month GOS
No difference in delayed ischemic neurological deficits between treatment and control groups. Less cerebral infarction in treatment group (0% versus 66%,P =0.028). Poor outcome caused by vasospasm 0% in treatment group and 71% in control group (P =0.046)
Munakata et al., Neurosurgery 2009 [21]
Eicosapentaenoic Acid Cerebral Vasospasm Therapy Study (EVAS)
Randomized, controlled, open label, multicenter, efficacy study of surgically clipped SAH patients
Eicosapentaenoic acid (omega 3 fatty acid) 900 mg TID × 30 days(N =81)
Control (usual treatment)(N =81)
Primary outcome: symptomatic vasospasm or infarct on HCTSecondary outcome: 1-month GOS
Symptomatic vasospasm occurred significantly less in the treatment group (15% versus 30% in controls,P =0.022) as did infarction from vasospasm (7% versus 21% in controls, P =0.012)
Yoneda et al., World Neurosurg 2012 [22]
Safety and efficacy of NA-1 in patients with iatrogenic stroke after endovascular aneurysm repair (ENACT): a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of ruptured (WFNS 1–3) and unruptured aneurysms undergoing endovascular repair
NA-1 2.6 mg/kg infusion over 10 minutes(N =92)
Placebo(N =93)
Primary outcome: safety, number and volume of ischemic strokes on MRI DWI and FLAIR 12–96 hours after infusion Secondary outcome: 30-day mRS, NIHSS, neurocognitive outcome
No difference in MRI lesion volume, but fewer ischemic lesions in NA-1 group compared to placebo (P =0.012). In the SAH subgroup (20% of cohort) their MRI number and ischemic volume was significantly less in the treatment group. No difference in 30 day NIHSS or mRS between groups
Hill et al., Lancet Neurol 2012 [23]
Statins
Simvastatin reduces vasospasm After aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a pilot randomized clinical trial
Randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial
Simvastatin 80 mg qd for 14 days(N =19)
Placebo(N =20)
Primary outcome: delayed ischemic neurological deficit confirmed by TCD or angiography. Secondary outcomes: liver transaminases, CK, von Willebrand factor, S100
Vasospasm occurred in 26% of treatment group compared to 60% of placebo group (P <0.05). No differences in transaminitis or myositis. VWF and S100 were significantly lower in the treatment group (P <0.05)
Lynch et al., Stroke 2005 [24]
Effects of acute treatment with pravastatin on cerebral vasospasm, autoregulation, and delayed Ischemic deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A phase II randomized placebo-controlled trial
Randomized placebo-controlled, phase II Trial
Pravastatin 40 mg PO qd × 14 d(N =40)
Placebo(N =40)
Primary outcome: incidence, severity, and duration of vasospasm on TCD, duration of impaired autoregulation measured by transient hyperemic response on TCDSecondary outcome: vasospasm-related delayed ischemic deficits, disability at discharge
TCD vasospasm and severe vasospasm were reduced in the treatment group (P =0.006 and P =0.044, resp.). Duration of impaired autoregulation shortened in treatment group (P <0.01). Vasospasm-related delayed ischemic deficits was reduced (P <0.001) and mortality was reduced (P =0.037)
Tseng et al., Stroke 2005 [25]
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of simvastatin in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study
Simvastatin 80 mg qd in statin naïve Fisher 3 SAH until discharge or 21 days(N =19)
Placebo(N =20)
Primary outcome: death and drug morbidity (elevated CK, transaminases)Secondary outcomes: TCD, angiographic or clinical vasospasm, vasospasm-related infarcts, clinical outcomes at discharge, cardiac, and infectious morbidities
Mortality in 0% treatment group and 15% placebo group. Angiographically confirmed vasospasm in 26% treatment group and 25% placebo group. Vasospasm infarcts in 11% treatment group and 25% placebo group. All differencesP =NS
Chou et al., Stroke 2008 [26]
Biological effects of simvastatin in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial
Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial
Simvastatin 80 mg PO × 15 days(N =16)
Placebo(N =16)
Primary outcome: effect of simvastatin on laboratory parameters of endothelial function, fibrinolysis, coagulation, inflammation and cholesterolSecondary outcomes: TCD vasospasm, clinical signs of DCI, 3- and 6-month GOS
Simvastatin group had significantly lower total cholesterol and LDL, but no differences in coagulation, fibrinolysis, endothelium function, or inflammation. No differences in TCD vasospasm, clinical DCI, or poor outcome
Vergouwen et al., J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009 [27]
Aneurysm repair
Timing of operation for ruptured supratentorial aneurysms: a prospective randomized study
Randomized, prospective study of Hunt Hess grade I–III SAH patients
Acute surgery (day 0–3 after SAH)(N =71)
Intermediate surgery (day 4–7 after SAH)(N =70) Late surgery (day 8 or later after SAH) (N =70)
Primary outcome: 3-month dead, dependent or independent.Secondary outcomes: Neurological deficit from direct effect of initial bleed, complication of surgery, confirmed rebleeding, delayed ischemic deterioration, hydrocephalus, extracranial complications
Acute surgery patients were more often independent at 3-months (92% versus 79% in intermediate timing and 80% in the late timing group,P <0.01). Mortality was 6% in the early surgery group versus 13% in the late surgery group (P =NS)
Ohman and Heiskanen, J Neurosurg 1989 [28]
International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial
Randomized, unblinded trial of SAH patients with an aneurysm judged technically suitable for either clipping or coiling and clinical equipoise
Surgical clipping(N =1070)
Endovascular treatment by detachable platinum coils(N =1073)
Primary outcome: 1-year mRS 3–6 versus 1-2 Secondary outcomes: rebleeding, quality of life at 1 year (euroQol), frequency of epilepsy, cost effectiveness, neuropsychological outcomes
Dependent or dead at 1 year: 23.7% endovascular versus 30.6% clipping (P =0.0019).
Molyneux et al., ISAT Collaborative Group, Lancet 2002 [29]
International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion
Randomized, unblinded trial of SAH patients with an aneurysm judged technically suitable for either clipping or coiling and clinical equipoise
Surgical clipping(N =1070)
Endovascular treatment by detachable platinum coils(N =1073)
Primary outcome: 1-year mRS 3–6 versus 1-2Secondary outcomes: rebleeding, quality of life at 1-year (Euroqol), frequency of epilepsy, cost effectiveness, neuropsychological outcomes
Dead or dependent at 1-year: 23.5% of endovascular group versus 30.9% of clipping group. ARR 7.4%. Early survival advantage of coiling maintained up to 7 years (P =0.03). Lower risk of epilepsy in coiled group but higher late rebleeding risk in coiled group
Molyneux et al., Lancet 2005 [30]
The barrow ruptured aneurysm trial
Randomized, open-label, prospective, single-center study
Surgical clipping(N =238)
Endovascular coiling(N =233)
Primary outcome: 1-year mRS > 2
Poor outcome in 33.7% of clipped and 23.2% of coiled patients (P =0.02)
McDougall et al., J Neurosurg 2012 [31]
Lipid peroxidation inhibitor
Randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of tirilazad mesylate in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cooperative study in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand
Double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study in men and women with aneurysmal SAH
Tirilazad 0.6 mg/kg/ (N =257)Tirilazad 2 mg/kg/d(N =249)Tirilazad 6 mg/kg/d(N =256)up to 11 days
Placebo containing citrate vehicle(N =253)
Primary outcome: Symptomatic vasospasm Secondary outcome: 3-month GOS, NIHSS, infarct volume on head CT
The subgroup 6 mg/kg treatment arm had reduced mortality (P =NS) and better 3-month GOS (P =NS) compared to placebo. Less symptomatic vasospasm in 6 mg/kg group, but not significant. Men showed more benefit than women. No significant improvement with lower dosing groups
Kassell et al., J Neurosurg 1996 [32]
A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of tirilazad mesylate in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cooperative study in North America
Double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study in men and women with aneursymal SAH
Tirilazad 2 mg/kg/d(N =298) Tirilazad 6 mg/kg/d (N =299) up to 11 days
Placebo containing citrate vehicle (N =300)
Primary outcome: mortality at 76 days Secondary outcome: 3-month GOS and NIHSS, infarct volume on head CT symptomatic vasospasm, incidence, and severity of angiographic vasospasm
No difference in mortality, favorable GOS outcome, or employment between groups. No differences in symptomatic or angiographic vasospasm
Haley et al., J Neurosurg 1997 [33]
Double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study of high-dose tirilazad mesylate in women with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Part I a cooperative study in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa
Double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study in women with aneurysmal SAH
Tirilazad mesylate 15 mg/kg/d IV hours for 11 days(N =405)
Placebo containing citrate vehicle (N =414)
Primary outcome: 91-day mortality Secondary outcome: 3-month GOS, clinical vasospasm, use of hypervolemic hypertensive therapy, neurological worsening from vasospasm, cerebral infarction, use of angioplasty, safety endpoints
Mortality rates and 3-month GOS not different between groups. Lower symptomatic vasospasm in tirilazad group (24.8% versus 33.7% in placebo group,P =0.005). Cerebral infarction 8% in treatment group versus 13% in placebo group (P <0.04)
Lanzino et al., J Neurosurg 1999 [34]
Double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study of high-dose tirilazad mesylate in women with aneursymal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Part II a cooperative study in North America
Double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study in women with aneurysmal SAH
Tirilazad mesylate 15 mg/kg/d IV up to 11 days(N =410)
Placebo containing citrate vehicle(N =413)
Primary outcome: mortality at 91 days in WFNS grade IV-V patients Secondary outcomes: 3 month GOS or clinical vasospasm 1–14 days from dosing, use of hypervolemic hypertensive therapy, neurological worsening from vasospasm, cerebral infarction, use of angioplasty, safety endpoints
No differences in mortality when analyzing the entire population. No difference in GOS, symptomatic vasospasm, vasospasm severity. In WFNS grades IV-V, lower mortality in treatment group (24.6% versus 43.4% in placebo,P =0.016). In WFNS I–III improved GOS in placebo group (83.3% versus 76.7% in treatment group, P =0.04)
Lanzino and Kassell, J Neurosurg 1999 [35]
Thrombolytics
Prevention of delayed ischemic deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage by intrathecal bolus injection of tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA)
Prospective, controlled trial of Fisher III clipped SAH patients
rTPA 10 mg IV intracisternal immediately following aneurysm clipping ± 5–10 mg IV TPA intraventricularly in patients with IVH(N =52)
No TPA instillation(N =68)
Primary outcome: clinical delayed ischemic deficits attributed to vasospasm Secondary outcome: 3-month GOS
Significantly less transient and permanent delayed ischemic deficits and better GOS in rTPA group
Seifert et al., Acta Neurochir 1994 [36]
A randomized trial of intraoperative, intracisternal tissue plasminogen activator for the prevention of vasospasm
Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study
rTPA 10 mg intracisternal at the time of aneurysm clipping(N =51)
Placebo vehicle (N =49)
Primary outcome: angiographic vasospasm Secondary outcome: mortality, 3-month GOS, symptomatic vasospasm, clot clearance on CT, TCD velocities, use of HHH on angioplasty to treat vasospasm
No difference in angiographic vasospasm, vasospasm treatment, TCD velocities, mortality, or 3-month GOS
Findlay, Neurosurgery 1995 [37]
Efficacy of low-dose tissue-plasminogen activator intracisternal administration for the prevention of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, controlled trial
Intermittent Tisokinase 960,000 IU via cisternal drain(N =20) Continuous infusion Tisokinase 1920 IU/h × 48 h via cisternal drain(N =20)
Control (standard treatment)(N =20)
Primary outcome: clearance of subarachnoid clots by HCTSecondary outcome: delayed cerebral ischemia, 3-month mRS and GOS
Subarachnoid clot by HCT and delayed cerebral ischemia were significantly less in the treatment groups compared to control (P <0.05). The intermittently treated group had better neurological outcomes than the control group (P <0.05)
Yamamoto et al., World Neurosurgery 2010 [38]
Anti-platelets
Dipyridamole and postoperative ischemic deficits in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind controlled trial
Dipyridamole 100 mg PO qd or 10 mg/day IV × 3-months(N =336)
Placebo(N =314)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOSSecondary outcome: neurological deterioration following aneurysm repair
No differences in 3-month GOS or delayed neurological deterioration
Shaw et al., J Neurosurg 1985 [39]
Randomized controlled trial of acetylsalicylic Acid in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the MASH study
Randomized controlled pilot study; factorial design (magnesium versus placebo and ASA versus placebo, separated a priori)
Aspirin 100 mg PR qd × 14 days within 12 hours of aneurysm occlusion.(N =87)
Placebo(N =74)
Primary outcome: delayed ischemic neurological deficits within 3-months of SAH consisting of HCT infarcts plus clinical declineSecondary outcome:new CT infarcts of any cause, postop hemorrhage, mRS ≥ 4, mRS ≥ 1
No difference in delayed ischemic events, CT infarction, or 3-month outcomes
Van den Bergh, Stroke 2006 [40]
Cilostazol improves outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a preliminary report
Randomized, single-blind, prospective, multicenter study
Cilostazol 100 mg PO BID(N =49)
Control (usual care)(N =51)
Primary outcome: symptomatic vasospasm and cerebral infarction, discharge mRS
No difference in symptomatic vasospasm or cerebral infarction. mRS at discharge better in treatment group (1.5 versus 2.6 in controls,P =0.041)
Suzuki et al., Cerebrovasc Dis 2011 [41]
Steroids
Effect of fludrocortisone acetate in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, placebo controlled, multicenter trial
Fludrocortisone 400 mcg/day BID × 12 days PO or IV(N =46)
Placebo(N =45)
Primary outcome:plasma volume change, fluid balance, sodium balanceSecondary outcome: delayed cerebral ischemia within 28 days and 28-day GOS
Treatment reduced negative sodium balance (P =0.014) but did not affect plasma volume. No significant difference in cerebral ischemia (22% versus 31% in controls, P =0.349). Similar outcome in each group
Hasan et al., Stroke 1989 [42]
A randomized controlled trial of hydrocortisone against hyponatremia in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, placebo-controlled study
Hydrocortisone 300 mg q 6 h × 10 d then taper over 4 d(N =35)
Placebo(N =36)
Primary outcome: hyponatremia< 140 mmol/LSecondary outcome:30-day mRS, symptomatic vasospasm
Less sodium excretion and urine volume in treatment group (P =0.04). No significant differences in vasospasm or mRS
Katayama et al.,Stroke 2007 [43]
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of high-dose methylprednisolone in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrrhage
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single center study
Methylprednisolone 16 mg/kg IV qd × 3 days(N =49)
Placebo(N =46)
Primary outcome: symptomatic vasospasm and infarct on HCTSecondary Outcomes: 1 year GOS, functional outcome scale, and severity of delayed ischemic deficits
No significant difference in symptomatic vasospasm or infarct on HCT. No difference in 1-year GOS or delayed ischemic deficits at 3-months. Poor outcome by functional outcome scale was reduced in treatment group (P =0.02)
Gomis et al.,J Neurosurg 2010 [44]
Transfusion/erythropoietin/albumin
Acute systemic erythropoietin therapy to reduce delayed ischemic deficits following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Erythropoietin IV (30,000 u) every 48 h for a total of 90,000 U(N =40)
Placebo(N =40)
Primary outcome: incidence, duration and severity of TCD vasospasm; duration of impaired autoregulation by TCDSecondary outcome: incidence of delayed ischemic deficits, mRS, GOS, and NIHSS at discharge and 6-months
No differences in incidence of TCD vasospasm or adverse events. Treatment group had less severe TCD vasospasm (P =−0.037), reduced delayed ischemic deficits/delayed cerebral infarcts (P =0.001), and shortened duration of impaired autoregulation (P <0.001) and more favorable discharge outcome (P =0.039)
Tseng et al.,J Neurosurg 2009 [45]
Prospective, randomized trial of higher goal hemoglobin after SAH
Prospective, randomized pilot safety, and feasibility study
Packed RBC transfusion to goal Hgb 11.5 g/dL(N =21)
Packed RBC transfusion to goal Hgb 10 g/dL(N =23)
Primary outcomes: days of core temp > 100.4 F, ventilator-free days, hemoglobin levelSecondary outcomes: NIHSS, mRS, and MRI at 14 days, mRS at 28 days and 3-months
Higher target Hgb resulted in more transfusions. No difference in safety endpoints. Number of MRI infarcts, NIHSS, and mRS similar between both groups at all timepoints
Naidech et al., Neurocrit Care 2010 [46]
The Albumin in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage multicenter pilot clinical trial: safety and neurologic outcomes (ALISAH)
Open label, dose escalation study
Albumin in 3 tier doses: 0.625 g/kg/d (N =20), 1.25 g/kg/d (N =20), 1.875 g/kg/d (N =7) × 7 days(N =47 total)
NA
Primary outcomes: severe to life threatening heart failure, anaphylaxisSecondary outcomes: functional outcome at 3-months
Doses up to 1.25 g/kg/d × 7 days tolerated without dose-limiting complications. Trend toward better outcomes in 1.25 g/kg/d dose compared to 0.625 g/kg/d
Suarez et al.,Stroke 2012 [47]
Vasodilators—CRGP and endothelin receptor antagonist
Effect of calcitonin-gene-related peptide in patients with delayed postoperative cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, single-blind, controlled, multicenter study
Calcitonin-related gene peptide (0.6mcg/min) × 10 days(N =62)
Standard medical therapy(N =55)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOS
No difference in 3-month GOS. Hypotension common in treatment group.
Bell, European CGRP in subarachnoid Hemorrhage study group, Lancet 1992 [48]
Clazosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, in patients with aneurysmal SAh undergoing surgical clipping: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial(CONSCIOUS 2)
Phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded
Clazosentan (5 mg/h IV up to 14 days)(N =748)
Placebo(N =389)
Primary outcomes: cerebral vasospasm-related morbidity (DCI/DIND/vasospasm therapy), all-cause mortality at 6 weeksSecondary outcomes: 12-week GOSE
No effect on primary endpoint (21% in clazosentan group and 25% in placebo groupP =NS). Poor outcome (GOSE) in 29% clazosentan and 25% placebo group
MacDonald et al., Lancet Neuol 2011 [49]
Randomized trial of clazosentan in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage undergoing endovascular coiling(CONSCIOUS 3)
Phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded;terminated early for futility (planned N =1500)
Clazosentan(5 or 15 mg/h IV up to 14 days)(N =194)
Placebo(N =189)
Primary outcomes: cerebral vasospasm related morbidity (DCI/DIND/vasospasm therapy), all-cause mortality at 6 weeksSecondary outcomes: 12-week GOSE
Clazosentan 15 mg/h significantly reduced vasospasm-related morbidity/all-cause mortality at 6 weeks but did not improve long-term outcomePrimary outcome: 24% in clazosentan 5 mg/h and 27% in placebo group P =NS and 15% in clazosentan 15 mg/h P =0.007 Poor outcome in 25% of clazosentan 5 mg/h, 28% clazosentan 15 mg/h, and 24% of placebo group P =NS.
MacDonald et al., Stroke 2012 [50]
Hypertensive, hypervolemic therapy (prophylactic)
Effect of hypervolemic therapy on cerebral blood flow after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized controlled trial
Randomized, controlled, single-center study
High-volume management (with colloid and crystalloid) to target PADP ≥ 14 mmHg or CVP ≥ 8 mmHg(N =41)
Normal volume management (with colloid and crystalloid) to target PADP ≥ 7 mmHg or CVP ≥ 5 mmHg(N =41)
Primary outcome: CBF by Xenon CT and blood volume by tagged RBCSecondary outcomes: symptomatic vasospasm, medical complications, GOS and 3, 6, and 12 months
High-volume management patients received significantly more fluid but there was no effect on net fluid balance or blood volume. No difference in CBF or vasospasm
Lennihan et al.,Stroke 2000 [51]
Prophylactic hyperdynamic postoperative fluid therapy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a clinical, prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Randomized, controlled Prospective, trial of Hunt Hess I–III patients
Hypertensive (MAP 20 mmHg greater than pre-op), hypervolemic (CVP 8–12 mmHg) and hemodilutional (Hct 30–35%) therapy(N =16)
Normovolemic crystalloid fluid therapy until day 12(N =16)
Primary outcome: TCD vasospasm, CBF by SPECT on day 12Secondary outcomes: 1 year GOS, neuropsych outcomes, and SPECT
No differences in TCD vasospasm or SPECT CBF. No difference in 1-year GOS, SPECT, or neuropsych outcomes
Egge et al.,Neurosurgery 2001 [52]
Magnesium
Intravenous magnesium sulfate for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (IMASH): a randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial
Randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial.
MgSO4 IV infusion to 2x baseline value (20 mmol over 30 minutes then continuous infusion of 80 mmol/d × 14 days; maximum allowed serum Mg of 2.5 mmol/L(N =169)
Equivalent volume of normal saline infusion. Occasional changes in infusion rates to maintain blinding.(N =158)
Primary outcome: 6-month GOSE 5–8Secondary outcome: clinical vasospasm during initial 2 weeks, 6-month mRS, Barthel Index, and Short Form 36
Favorable 6-month GOSE (5–8) 64% of Mg group and 63% placebo (P =NS)No difference in mRS, Barthel, Short Form 36, or clinical vasospasm. No subgroup differences
Wong et al.,Stroke 2010 [53]
Magnesium for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (MASH-2): a randomized placebo-controlled trial
Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter, phase III trial
MgSO4 IV 64 mmol/day(N =606)
Placebo(N =507)
Primary outcome: 3-month mRS 4–6
No difference in poor outcome in the MgSO4 group (26.2% versus 25.3% in placebo group)
Mees et al.,Lancet 2012 [54]
Adrenergic blockade
Beneficial effects of adrenergic blockade in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized controlled trial
Phentolamine 20 mg q 3 h + propranolol 80 mg q 8 × 3 weeks(N =68)
Placebo(N =66)
Primary outcome: neurological deficit at 28 days
Trend toward less neurological deficit in the treated group (P =0.053)
Walter et al.,BMJ 1982 [55]
Endovascular therapy
Effect of prophylactic transluminal balloon angioplasty on cerebral vasospasm and outcome in patients with Fisher grade III subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a phase II multicenter, randomized clinical trial
Unblinded, randomized phase II trial of Fisher III and Fisher III + IV SAH patients after clipping or coiling within 96 h of rupture
Balloon angioplasty of bilateral A1, M1, P1, basilar, intradural vertebral artery, and supraclinoid ICA. Protocol later revised to exclude A1 and P1(N =85)
No prophylactic balloon angioplasty(N =85)
Primary outcome: 3-month GOSSecondary outcome: delayed ischemic neurological deficit, TCD vasospasm, ICU, and hospital length of stay
Nonsignificant difference in delayed ischemic neurological deficits but less therapeutic angioplasty required in treatment group (P =0.03). No significant difference in GOS outcomes. LOS similar. Four patients had procedure related vessel perforation, three of whom died
Zwienenberg-Lee et al., Stroke 2008 [56]
Rho kinase inhibitor—fasudil
Effect of AT877 on cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Results of a prospective placebo-controlled double-blind trial
Randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, multicenter study in Hunt Hess I–IV clipped SAH patients
Fasudil (AT877)30 mg IV over 30 minutes, TID × 14 days(N =131)
Placebo(N =136)
Primary outcome: reduction of incidence or severity of angiographic vasospasm, reduction of incidence and size of low-density CT lesions due to vasospasm, reduction of incidence of symptomatic vasospasm, poor outcome (1-month GOS) due to vasospasm
Fasudil significantly reduced angiographic vasospasm (38% in treatment group versus 61% in placebo group,P =0.0023), infarcts reduced (16% in treatment versus 38% in placebo group, P =0.0013) and symptomatic vasospasm reduced (35% in treatment versus 50% in placebo, P =0.0247). Poor outcome (GOS 1–4) attributable to vasospasm occurred in 12% of treatment group and 26% of placebo group (P =0.0152). No serious adverse events in fasudil group
Shibuya et al.,J Neurosurg 1992 [57]
Efficacy and safety of fasudil in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: final results of a randomized trial of fasudil versus nimodipine
Randomized, open label, multicenter study of SAH Hunt-Hess grade I–IV clipped patients
Fasudil 30 mg IV TID × 14 days(N =63)
Nimodipine 1-2 mg/h × 14 days(N =66)
Primary outcome: symptomatic vasospasm or infarct on HCTSecondary outcome:1-month GOS
No difference in symptomatic vasospasm or HCT infarcts. Improved GOS outcomes in fasudil group (good outcome in 74.5% versus 61.7% in nimodipine group,P =0.040)
Zhao et al.,Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2011 [58]
Intensive insulin therapy
The effect of intensive insulin therapy on infection rate, vasospasm, neurologic outcome and mortality in neurointensive care unit after intracranial aneurysm clipping in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized prospective Pilot trial
Randomized, controlled study
Intensive Insulin Infusion (80–120 mg/dL) × 14 d(N =40)
Conventional insulin infusion (glucose 80–220 mg/dL) × 14 d(N=38)
Primary outcome: infectionSecondary outcomes: vasospasm, 6-month mortality, and mRS
Higher infection rate in the conventional group (42% versus 27% in intensive group,P<0.001). Similar vasospasm, mortality, and mRS at 6 months
Bilotta et al.,J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2007 [59]
Hypothermia
Mild intraoperative hypothermia during surgery for intracranial aneurysm (IHAST)
Randomized, prospective, partially blinded, controlled, multicenter trial of WFNS grade I–III SAH patients
Intraoperative hypothermia (target 33°C with surface cooling)(N =499)
Intraoperative normothermia (target 36.5°C)(N =501)
Primary outcome: GOS at 90 daysSecondary outcomes: 90-day mRS, Barthel Index, NIHSS, neuropsych testing, adverse events
No difference in 90 day GOS. Good GOS in 66% of hypothermia versus 63% of control patients (P =NS). No differences in death, length of stay, or discharge disposition. Postoperative bacteremia more common in the hypothermia group (5% versus 3%, P =0.05)
Todd et al.,NEJM 2005 [60]Table 2
Randomized controlled trials assessing neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest—completed trials.
Trial name
Study design
Treatment group
Control group
Outcome measure
Results
Reference
Calcium channel blockers
Effects of nimodipine on cerebral blood flow and cerebrospinal fluid pressure after cardiac arrest: correlation with neurologic outcome
Randomized, double-blind study
Nimodipine IV 0.25 mcg/kg/min(N =25)
Placebo(N =26)
Primary outcome: CBF measured by Xenon CTSecondary outcomes: ICP, neurological disability
Higher CBF in nimodipine group in first 4 hours after arrest (P <0.05) but no difference at 24 hours. No difference in neurological outcomes
Forsman et al.,Anesth Analg 1989 [64]
Neuropsychological sequelae of cardiac arrest
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation
Nimodipine 10 mcg/kg IV then 0.5 mcg/kg/min × 24 hours(N =35)
Placebo(N =33)
Primary outcome: 3- and 12-month neuropsychological and cognitive batteries
No difference in neuropsychological or cognitive outcome between groups
Roine et al.,JAMA 1992 [65]
A randomized clinical study of a calcium-entry blocker (lidoflazine) in the treatment of comatose survivors of cardiac arrest
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study
Lidoflazine 1 mg/kg loading dose then 0.25 mg/kg at 8 and 16 hours after resuscitation(N =259)
Placebo(N =257)
Primary outcome: Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Scale at 6 monthsSecondary outcomes: mortality, complications
No difference in 6-month neurological outcome or mortality between groups
Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial II Study Group, NEJM 1991 [66]
Nimodipine after resuscitation from out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation
Nimodipine 10 mcg/kg IV then 0.5 mcg/kg/min × 24 hours(N =75)
Placebo(N =80)
Primary outcome: survival, 1-year GOSSecondary outcomes: death related to anoxic encephalopathy, GCS at 24 hours and 1 week, 3- and 12-month mini-mental state exam, activities of daily living, Barthel index, neurological exam, seizure, SPECT, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias
No difference in the survival rate, GOS at 3 or 12 months. No difference in minimental state exam, activities of daily living, or seizures
Roine et al.,JAMA 1990 [67]
Neuroprotective
Coenzyme Q 10 combined with mild hypothermia after cardiac arrest: a preliminary study
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single-center study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Hypothermia 35-36°C × 24 hours + Coenzyme Q 10 250 mg PO × 1 then 150 mg PO TID(N =25)
Hypothermia 35-36°C × 24 hours + Placebo(N =24)
Primary outcome: survival to ICU dischargeSecondary outcomes: 3-month survival, 3-month GOS, S100 levels
3-month survival was 68% in the treatment group and 29% in the control group (P =0.0413). There was no significant difference in survival until discharge or GOS outcome
Damian et al., Circulation 2004 [68]
Thrombolytics
A pilot randomized trial of thrombolysis in cardiac arrest (the TICA trial)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, single-center, feasibility trial for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Tenecteplase 50 mg IV × 1(N =19)
Placebo(N =16)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: survival to ED, ICU and hospital discharge
ROSC in 42% of tenecteplase and 6% of placebo group. No difference in survival to hospital discharge
Fatovich et al., Resuscitation 2004 [69]
Thrombolysis during resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Tenecteplase 0.5 mg/kg IV(N =525)
Placebo(N =525)
Primary outcome: survival at 30 daysSecondary outcomes: survival to admission, ROSC, 24-hour survival, survival to discharge, cerebral performance score at discharge
No difference in 30-day survival, hospital admission, ROSC, 24-hour survival, discharge, or neurologic outcome. More intracranial hemorrhages in treatment group
Böttiger et al., NEJM 2008 [70]
Steroids and pressors
Vasopressin, epinephrine, and corticosteroids for In-hospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center study
Vasopressin 20 IU IV + epinephrine 1 mg IV + methylprednisolone 40 mg IV followed by hydrocortisone(N =48)
Epinephrine + placebo(N =52)
Primary outcome: ROSC, survival to dischargeSecondary outcomes: blood pressure after CPR, organ failure-free days, discharge Glasgow-Pittsburg cerebral performance scale
More ROSC in treatment group (81% versus 52%,P =0.003) and more survival to discharge (19% versus 4%, P =0.02)
Mentzelopoulos et al.,Arch Intern Med 2009 [71]
Pressors
A comparison of standard-dose and high-dose epinephrine in cardiac arrest outside the hospital
Randomized, double-blind, prospective, multi-center study
Epinephrine 0.2 mg/kg IV(N =648)
Epinephrine 0.02 mg/kg IV(N =632)
Primary outcome: return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), admission to the hospitalSecondary outcome: cerebral performance scale at admission, and discharge
No difference in ROSC rates, admission, survival, or discharge neurological status
Brown et al., NEJM 1992 [72]
Standard doses versus repeated high doses of epinephrine in cardiac arrest outside the hospital
Randomized, double-blind, prospective, single-center study
Repeated epinephrine 5 mg IV(N =271)
Repeated epinephrine 1 mg IV(N =265)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: admission to the hospital, discharge, cerebral performance category at discharge and 6 months
No difference in ROSC, admission, discharge, or 6-month neurological outcomes
Choux et al., Resuscitation 1995 [73]
A randomized, double-blind comparison of methoxamine and epinephrine in human cardiopulmonary arrest
Randomized, double-blind, single-center study
Methoxamine 40 mg bolus IV then 40 mg 4 minutes later(N =77)
Epinephrine 2 mg bolus then 2 mg IV q 4 min(N =68)
Primary outcome: Mortality and Glasgow-Pittsburgh coma scoreSecondary outcomes: ROSC, successful resuscitation
No difference in ROSC or neurologic outcome, initial resuscitation, or survival to discharge
Patrick et al.,Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995 [74]
Randomised comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation
Randomized, double-blind, single-center, controlled study of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation patients who failed defibrillation
Vasopressin 40 IU IV(N =20)
Epinephrine 1 mg IV(N =20)
Primary outcome: survival to admissionSecondary outcome: 24-hour survival, survival to discharge, GCS at discharge
No significant difference in survival to admission but more vasopressin patients survived 24 hours (60% versus 20%,P =0.02). No difference in survival to discharge or GCS at discharge
Lindner et al.,Lancet 1997 [75]
High-dose versus standard-dose epinephrine treatment of cardiac arrest after failure of standard therapy
Randomized, controlled, single-blind, multicenter study of patients who had failed on standard dose of epinephrine 0.5–1.0 mg IV
Epinephrine 0.1 mg/kg IV up to 4 doses(N =78)
Epinephrine 0.01 mg/kg IV up to 4 doses(N =62)
Primary outcome: improvement in cardiac rhythm or ROSCSecondary outcomes: GCS at 6, 24, and 72 hours
No differences in ROSC, survival, or neurologic function between groups
Sherman et al., Pharmacotherarpy 1997 [76]
A comparison of repeated high doses and repeated standard doses of epinephrine for cardiac arrest outside the hospital
Randomized, controlled, prospective multicenter study
Epinephrine 5 mg IV up to 15 doses at 3-minute intervals(N =1677)
Epinephrine 1 mg IV up to 15 doses at 3-minute intervals(M = 1650)
Primary outcome: ROSC, admission to the hospital, number of admissions after a single dose of epinephrine, hospital dischargeSecondary outcomes: survival, neurological outcome by GCS and cerebral performance scale
Significantly more ROSC in high dose group (40% versus 36% of control group,P =0.02) and more survival to admission (26.5% versus 23.6% of controls, P =0.05). No difference in survival to discharge or neurological status
Gueugniaud et al., NEJM 1998 [77]
Vasopressin versus epinephrine for in hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial
Randomized, controlled, triple-blind, multicenter study of in-hospital cardiac arrest for asystole, PEA, or refractory ventricular fibrillation
Vasopressin 40 IU IV (first pressor)(N =104)
Epinephrine 1 mg IV (first pressor)(N =96)
Primary outcome: survival for 1 hourSecondary outcomes: survival to hospital discharge, modified mini-mental state exam at discharge, cerebral performance score at discharge, ROSC, adverse events
No difference in survival at 1 hour or survival to hospital discharge. No difference in mini-mental state exam scores or cerebral performance scores
Stiell et al.,Lancet 2001 [78]
A comparison of vasopressin and epinephrine for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Randomized, controlled, multicenter study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation failing defibrillation, PEA, or asystole
Vasopressin 40 IU IV × 2 doses maximum(N =589)
Epinephrine 1 mg IV × 2 doses maximum(N =597)
Primary outcome: survival to hospital admissionSecondary outcomes: survival to hospital discharge, cerebral performance score in survivors
No difference in survival to admission among patients with ventricular fibrillation or PEA. Higher rates of hospital admission for asystole in vasopressin group (29% versus 20%,P =0.02) and hospital discharge (4.7% versus 1.5% with epinephrine, P =0.04). Patients who received rescue epinephrine after vasopressin had better survival to admission and discharge than the epinephrine alone group. No difference in cerebral performance
Wenzel et al.,NEJM 2004 [79]
Vasopressin and epinephrine versus epinephrine alone in cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Randomized, controlled, multicenter trial
Epinephrine 1 mg IV + Vasopressin 40 IU IV(N =1442)
Epinephrine 1 mg IV + Placebo(N =1452)
Primary outcome: Survival to hospital admissionSecondary outcomes: ROSC, survival to hospital discharge, good neurological recovery by cerebral performance scale, and GCS, 1-year survival
No differences in survival to admission, ROSC, survival to discharge, 1-year survival, or good neurologic recovery
Gueugniaud et al., NEJM 2008 [80]
Magnesium
Randomised trial of magnesium in in-hospital cardiac arrest (MAGIC trial)
Randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center study of cardiac arrest in the ICU or general ward
Magnesium 2 g IV bolus then 8 g over 24 hours(N =76)
Placebo(N =80)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: 24-hour survival, survival to hospital discharge, GCS, and discharge Karnofsky
No difference in ROSC, 24-hour survival, survival to discharge, or GCS
Thel et al.,Lancet 1997 [81]
Magnesium in cardiac arrest (the MAGIC trial)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
MgSO4 5 g IV × 1 (N =31)
Placebo(N =36)
Primary outcome: ECG rhythm 2 minutes after drug, ROSCSecondary outcomes: survival to ED, ICU, and hospital discharge
No differences in ROSC or survival
Fatovich et al., Resuscitation 1997 [82]
Magnesium sulfate in the treatment of refractory ventricular fibrillation in the prehospital setting
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of prehospital ventricular fibrillation refractory to 3 shocks
MgSO4 2 g IV × 1 (N =58)
Placebo(N =58)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: admission to hospital, hospital discharge
No difference in ROSC, survival to admission or discharge
Allegra et al.,Resuscitation 2001 [83]
A randomized trial to investigate the efficacy of magnesium sulphate for refractory ventricular fibrillation
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ventricular fibrillation refractory to 3 shocks
MgSO4 2–4 g IV × 1 (N =52)
Placebo(N =53)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcome: hospital discharge
No differences in ROSC or survival to discharge
Hassan et al.,Emerg Med J 2002 [84]
Randomized clinical trial of magnesium, diazepam, or both after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled factorial design study
Tier 1: magnesium 2 g IV + placebo(N =75)Tier 2: diazepam 10 mg IV + placebo (N =75) Tier 3: magnesium 2 g IV + Diazepam 10 g IV (N =75)
Placebo only(N =75)
Primary outcome: awakening at 3 months (comprehensible speech and command following)Secondary outcome: days to awakening, days to death, independent at 3 months
No difference in neurological outcome between the 3 groups
Longstreth et al., Neurology 2002 [85]
Insulin
Intravenous glucose after out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: a community-based randomized trial
Randomized, single-center controlled study
5% dextrose (D5W) infusion(N =374)
0.45 saline infusion(N =374)
Primary outcome: command following or comprehensible speechSecondary outcomes: survival to hospital admission and discharge
No difference in neurological outcomes, or survival to admission or discharge
Longstreth et al., Neurology 1993 [86]
Strict versus moderate glucose control after resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation
Randomized, controlled, multicenter study of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest
Strict glucose control (4–6 mmol/L) with insulin infusion × 48 hours(N =39)
Moderate glucose control (6–8 mmol/L) with insulin infusion × 48 hours(N =51)
Primary outcome: 30-day all-cause mortality after ROSCSecondary outcomes: neuron-specific enolase levels at 24 and 48 hours
No difference in 30-day mortality
Oksanen et al., Intensive Care Med 2007 [87]
Hypothermia
Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia
Randomized, controlled, single-blind, prospective study
Hypothermia 33°C × 12 h(N =43)
Normothermia 37°C(N =34)
Primary outcome: discharge dispositionSecondary outcomes: adverse events, hemodynamic parameters
Good discharge disposition in 49% of treatment group compared to 26% of normothermia group (P =0.046). No difference in adverse events
Bernard et al., NEJM 2002 [88]
Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest
Randomized, controlled, single-blind, multicenter, prospective study
Hypothermia 32–34°C × 24 h(N =137)
Normothermia 37°C(N =138)
Primary outcome: 6 month neurologic outcome using Pittsburgh cerebral performance scaleSecondary outcome: 6-month mortality, complications at 7 days
Hypothermia group had more favorable neurological outcome at 6 months (55% versus 39% of normothermia group,P =0.009). Less death in hypothermia group (41% versus 55% in normothermia group, P =0.02). No difference in complication rates
The hypothermia after cardiac arrest study group, NEJM 2002 [89]
Pilot randomized clinical trial of prehospital induction of mild hypothermia in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with a rapid infusion of 4 degrees C normal saline
Randomized, controlled, safety and feasibility study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
2 L 4°C normal saline infusion(N =63)
Standard care(N =62)
Primary outcome: esophageal temperature, adverse eventsSecondary outcomes: awakening, hospital discharge
Significant differences in temperature between groups (P <0.001). No difference in awakening or hospital discharge
Kim et al.,Circulation 2007 [90]
Prehospital therapeutic hypothermia for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial
Randomized controlled trail of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
4°C Ringers solution 30 mL/kg to target temperature 33°C(N =19)
Conventional fluid therapy(N =18)
Primary outcome: nasopharyngeal temperatureSecondary outcomes: hospital mortality and cerebral performance scale
Lower core temperature in the treatment group (P <0.001). No difference in safety, mortality, or neurologic outcome
KÄmÄrÄinen et al., Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009 [91]
Intra-arrest transnasal evaporative cooling: a randomized, prehospital, multicenter study (PRINCE: pre-rosc intranasal cooling effectiveness)
Randomized, controlled, prospective, single-blind, multicenter study for out-of-hospital arrest
Intra-arrest intranasal cooling with RhinoChill device + cooling at hospital arrival to 34°C(N =93)
Standard care with cooling at hospital arrival to 34°C(N =101)
Primary Outcome: adverse events, length of stay, mechanical ventilation days, ROSC, survival to discharge, discharge Pittsburgh cerebral performance scale.
Time to target temperature was shorter in the intranasal cooling group (P =0.03). No difference in ROSC, survival of admitted patients, or neurologic outcome at discharge
Castrén et al., Circulation 2010 [92]
Chest compressions
A comparison of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrests occurring in the hospital
Randomized, controlled, single center study
CPR using suction device (Ambu CardioPump)(N =29)
Standard CPR(N =33)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: 24-hour survival, hospital discharge, GCS at 24 hours
ROSC occurred in 62% of treatment group versus 30% of control group (P <0.03) and 45% of treatment group survived 24 hours compared to 9% of control group (P <0.004). GCS at 24 hours was better in the treatment group (P <0.02)
Cohen et al.,NEJM 1993 [93]
The Ontario Trial of Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for In-Hospital andPrehospital Cardiac Arrest
Randomized, single-blind, multicenter controlled trial of prehospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest
Active compression-decompression CPR using a suction device(N =906)
Standard CPR(N =878)
Primary outcome: survival for 1 hourSecondary outcome: survival to hospital discharge, modified mini-mental state exam, cerebral performance scale
No differences in survival at 1 hour, survival until hospital discharge or mini-mental state exam for either prehospital or in-hospital arrest
Stiell et al.,JAMA 1996 [94]
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by chest compression alone or with mouth-to-mouth ventilation
Randomized controlled study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Bystander chest compression plus mouth to mouth resuscitation(N =279)
Bystander chest compressions alone(N =241)
Primary outcome: survival to hospital dischargeSecondary outcomes: admission to the hospital, neurological status
Similar outcome with bystander chest compressions alone versus chest compressions with mouth to mouth
Hallstrom et al.,NEJM 2000 [95]
Constant flow insufflations of oxygen as the sole mode of ventilation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, controlled study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Constant flow insufflations of oxygen(N =487)
Standard endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation(N =457)
Primary outcome: survival to ICU dischargeSecondary outcomes: ROSC, survival to hospital admission, spO2 > 70%
No difference in ROSC, hospital admission or ICU discharge. Higher O2 sats in continuous flow insufflation group
Bertrand et al., Intensive Care Med 2006 [96]
Compression-only CPR or standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, controlled, multicenter study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Compression only CPR(N =620)
Standard CPR(N =656)
Primary outcome: 30 day survivalSecondary outcomes: 1 day survival, ROSC, survival to hospital discharge
Similar 30-day survival, 1-day survival and survival to hospital discharge
Svensson et al.,NEJM 2010 [97]
CPR with chest compression alone or with rescue breathing
Randomized, controlled, multicenter study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Chest compressions alone(N =981)
Chest Compressions + Rescue breathing (2 breaths to 15 chest compressions)(N =960)
Primary outcome: survival to hospital dischargeSecondary outcomes: discharge cerebral performance Score, ROSC
No difference in survival to hospital discharge or in neurologic outcome. Trend toward improved survival at discharge in those with cardiac cause of arrest and shockable rhythm (P =0.09)
Rea et al.,NEJM 2010 [98]
A trial of an impedance threshold device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, controlled, double-blinded, multicenter study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Impedance threshold device (ITD) which increasing negative intrathoracic pressure and improves cardiac output(N =4373)
Sham ITD(N =4345)
Primary outcome: survival to hospital discharge with mRS 0–3Secondary outcomes: survival to ED admission, hospital admission and hospital discharge, adverse events
No difference in survival with good mRS
Aufderheide et al., NEJM 2011 [99]
Adenosine antagonist
Aminophylline in bradyasystolic cardiac arrest: a randomized placebo-controlled trial
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study of asystole and PEA arrest unresponsive to epinephrine and atropine
Aminophylline 250 mg(N =486)
Placebo(N =485)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: duration of ROSC, survival to admission, survival to discharge, length of stay, 24-hour tachyarrhythmias, 24-hour seizures, 1-year neurologic outcome by GCS, Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral and overall performance scales, modified mini-mental state exam, functional status questionnaire
No difference in ROSC. More tachyarrhythmias in the treatment group. Survival to hospital admission and survival to discharge were not different
Abu-Laban et al., Lancet 2006 [100]
Fluid management
Capillary leakage in postcardiac arrest survivors during therapeutic hypothermia: a prospective, randomized study
Randomized, controlled study
7.2% hypertonic saline with 6% poly starch solution × 24 hours(N =10)
Standard Fluid (Ringer’s acetate) × 24 hours(N =9)
Primary outcome: amount of fluid administered in 24 hoursSecondary outcome: MRI vasogenic edema
The treatment group required significantly less fluid than the control group. There was no difference in MRI brain edema
Heradstveit et al., Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2010 [101]
Barbiturate
Randomized clinical study of thiopental loading in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest
Randomized, controlled, multicenter study
Thiopental 30 mg/kg IV load(N =131)
Standard therapy (N =131)
Primary outcome: Pittsburgh cerebral Performance scale at 6 and 12 monthsSecondary outcomes: best neurological performance ever obtained during followup, time to recovery
No difference in neurological outcome or mortality between groups
Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial I Study Group.NEJM 1986 [102]
Calcium
Calcium chloride: reassessment of use in asystole
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in prehospital asystolic cardiac arrest refractory to epinephrine, bicarbonate, and atropine
Calcium chloride(N =18)
Placebo(N =14)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcome: hospital discharge
No difference in ROSC
Stueven et al.,Ann Emerg Med 1984 [103]
The effectiveness of calcium chloride in refractory electromechanical dissociation
Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study of prehospital PEA arrest refractory to epinephrine and bicarbonate
Calcium chloride(N =48)
Placebo(N =42)
Primary outcome: ROSCSecondary outcomes: survival to hospital discharge
No difference in ROSC but subgroup of patients with widened QRS did have more ROSC in calcium group (P =0.028)
Stueven et al.,Ann Emerg Med 1985 [104]
Lack of effectiveness ofcalcium chloride in refractory asystole
Randomized, blinded, placebo controlledstudy of prehospital asystolic cardiac arrest refractory to epinephrine, bicarbonate, and atropine
Calcium chloride(N =39)
Placebo(N =34)
Primary outcome:ROSC Secondary outcomes: survival to hospital discharge
No difference in ROSC or hospital discharge
Stueven et al.,Ann Emerg Med 1985 [105]
Sodium bicarbonate
Buffer therapy during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of out-of-hospital asystole or ventricular fibrillation refractory to first defibrillation attempt
Sodium bicarbonate 250 mL IV × 1(N =245)
Placebo(N =257)
Primary outcome: survival to ICU admission, survival to hospital discharge
No difference in survival to ICU admission or hospital discharge
Dybvik et al.,Resuscitation 1995 [106]
Sodium bicarbonate improves outcome in prolonged prehospital cardiac arrest
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of prehospital cardiac arrest
Sodium bicarbonate (1 meq/kg) IV × 1(N =175)
Placebo(N =155)
Primary outcome: survival to EDSecondary outcomes: ROSC
No difference in survival to ED admission or ROSC. Better survival with bicarbonate in the prolonged (>15 minute) arrest group (P =0.007)
Vukmir and Katz,Am J Emerg Med2006 [107]
Hemofiltration
High-volume hemofiltration after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized study
Randomized, controlled trial of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation or asystole cardiac arrest
Tier 1: hemofiltration (200 mL/kg/h) over 8 hours(N =20) Tier 2: hemofiltration plus hypothermia to 32°C × 24 hours(N =22)
Standard care(N =19)
Primary outcome: survival at 6 monthsSecondary outcome: intractable shock, Pittsburgh cerebral performance scale
Significantly better survival compared to control in hemofiltration group (P =0.026) and hemofiltration plus hypothermia group (P =0.018). No difference in 6-month neurologic outcome
Laurent et al.,J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 [108]
Rhythm analysis
Early versus later rhythm analysis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Cluster randomized, controlled, multicenter study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Early rhythm analysis: 30–60 seconds of EMS CPR followed by ECG analysis(N =5290)
Later rhythm analysis: 180 seconds of EMS CPR followed by ECG analysis(N =4643)
Primary outcome: survival to hospital discharge with mRS 0–3Secondary outcomes: survival to discharge, survival to hospital admission, ROSC
No difference in outcome between a brief and longer period of CPR before ECG analysis of rhythm
Stiell et al.,NEJM 2011 [109]Table 3
Randomized controlled trials assessing neurologic outcomes after aneurysmal Subarachnoid hemorrhage—ongoing trials.
Trial name
Study design
Treatment group
Control group
Target enrollment
Outcome measure
PI
Comments
Statins
Statins and cerebral blood flow in SAH
Randomized, double-blind efficacy study
Simvastatin 80 mg/d for 21 days
Placebo
60
Primary outcome: resting CBF and autoregulation 7–10 days after SAHSecondary outcomes: OEF and CMRO2 7–10 days after SAH
Michael Diringer,NCT00795288
Uses PET to understand the mechanism of statin use in vasospasm
The role of statins in preventing cerebral vasospasm secondary to subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, double-blind, parallel assignment
Simvastatin 80 mg PO qd × 21 days
Placebo
80
Primary outcome: 6-month clinical outcome
Eberval Figueiredo,NCT01346748
—
Use of simvastatin for the prevention of vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, double-blind, parallel assignment efficacy trial
Tier 1: Simvastatin 40 mg × 21 d orTier 2:Simvastatin 80 mg × 21 d
Placebo
150
Primary outcome:21-day GOS, mRS, and Barthel IndexSecondary outcome: clinical vasospasm
Ben Roitberg,NCT00487461
—
High-dose simvastatin for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (HDS-SAH)
Randomized, parallel assignment, double-blind efficacy study
Simvastatin 80 mg PO × 21 days
Simvastatin 40 mg PO × 21 days
240
Primary outcome:delayed ischemic neurological deficit Secondary Outcomes: LFTs, rhabdomyolysis, 3-month mRS, cost effectiveness
George Wong, NCT01077206
There may be a biochemical and neuroprotective dose-related relationship between simvastatin and delayed ischemic neurological deficits.
Simvastatin in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (STASH):a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III trial
Simvastatin 40 mg PO qd × 21 days
Placebo
1600
Primary outcome: 6-month mRSSecondary outcome: need and intensity of delayed ischemic deficit rescue therapy, incidence and duration of delayed ischemic deficits, incidence and severity of sepsis, length of stay, discharge disposition
Peter Kirkpatrick,NCT00731627
Simvastatin may improve CBF and inflammation following SAH
Aneurysm repair
International subarachnoid aneurysm trial II comparing clinical outcomes of Surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms not included in the original ISAT study (ISAT II)
Randomized, open label, safety/efficacy study of WFNS I–IV
Surgical Clipping
Endovascular Coiling
1724
Primary outcome: 12-month mRS > 2Secondary outcomes: ICH following treatment, failure of aneurysm occlusion, all cause morbidity and mortality, aneurysm recurrence, hospitalization > 20 days or discharge other than home, aneurysm rebleed
Tim Darsaut, Max Findlay, and Jean Raymond,NCT01668563
ISAT included primarily small anterior circulation aneurysms. The optimal treatment of other locations and sizes of aneurysms remains unclear and coiling may not be as durable as clipping
Lipid peroxidation inhibitor
Acetaminophen in aSAH to inhibit lipid peroxidation and cerebral vasospasm
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety/efficacy trial
Group1: Acetaminophen 1 g q 6Group 2: NAC IV 0.5 g/h Group 3: Acetaminophen 1 g q6 + NAC 0.5 g/h Group 4: Acetaminophen 1.5 g q 6 + NAC 0.5 g/h
Placebo
120
Primary outcome: F2-IsoP biomarkers for lipid peroxidation.Secondary outcome: vasospasm and brain ischemia as assessed by CTA/CTP or MRI DWI
John Oates,NCT00585559
Hemoglobin released from lysed RBCs oxidizes and generates protein radicals that induce lipid peroxidation. Metabolites of peroxidations (F2-isoprostanes) are potent vasoconstrictors. Acetaminophen can inhibit these metabolites and NAC can inhibit lipid peroxidation
Neuroprotective drugs
Effects of tiopronin on 3-aminopropanal level and neurologic outcome after aneurysmal SAH
Randomized, double-blind, phase 2bioavailability
Tiopronin
Placebo
60
Primary outcome: serum and CSF 3AP levelsSecondary outcomes: 12 month mRS, Barthel, Lawton, NIHSS, TICS adverse events
E Sander Connolly,NCT01095731
3AP is toxic metabolite produced during cerebral ischemia. It is neutralized by tiopronin
Lycopene following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (LASH)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy study
Lycopene 30 mg PO qd × 21 days
Placebo
124
Primary outcome: TCD vasospasm, duration of impaired autoregulation measured by TCDSecondary Outcomes: LDL, oxy-LDL, CRP, circulating endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells
Karol Budohoski,NCT00905931
Lycopene is a natural antioxidant that may reduce vascular injury and inflammation and limit vasospasm
Thrombolytics
Intraventricular tPA in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind safety trail
tPA intraventricular q 12 h × 5 doses
Placebo administered q 12 h × 5 doses
12
Primary outcome: HCT rate and variance of ventricular and cisternal clot clearanceSecondary outcome: hemorrhagic complications, ventriculostomy-related infections, TCD vasospasm, CT angio vasospasm, symptomatic vasospasm, CSF cytokines and coagulation measurements, ICP, fever burden, volume of CSF drainage, 6-month GOSE and EuroQOL
Andreas Kramer,NCT01098890
Intraventricular TPA may accelerate clearance of IVH ameliorating vasospasm, hydrocephalus, and ICP
Transfusion
Effect of red blood cell transfusion on brain metabolism in patients with SAH
Open label safety/efficacy study in SAH patients with Hgb < 12.5 g/dL and DCI, high risk for vasospasm or angiographic vasospasm
Transfusion of 1 unit of packed RBC over 1 hour
NA
48
Primary outcome: percent of brain regions with low oxygen delivery before and 1 hour after transfusionSecondary outcomes: relationship of oxygen delivery and angiographic vasospasm
Michael Diringer, NCT00968227
Uses PET to assess the relationship between Hct and oxygen delivery in SAH patients
Vasodilators
Sildenafil for prevention of cerebral vasospasm (SIPCEVA)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety and efficacy study
Tier 1: sildenafil 25 mg PO TID day 3–14 after SAHTier 2: sildenafil 50 mg PO TID day 3–14 after SAH
Placebo
18
Primary outcome: New neurological deficit due to vasospasm up to 14 days after SAHSecondary outcomes: TCD spasm, mortality, adverse drug effects, length of stay, discharge mRS
Andre Cerutti Franciscatto,NCT01091870
—
Safety study of dantrolene in SAH
Randomized, double-blind safety study
Dantrolene
Placebo
30
Primary outcome: tolerability, hyponatremiaSecondary outcomes: liver toxicity, hemodynamics, ICP, TCD, angiographic vasospasm treatments, 90-day GOS, mRS, and Barthel
Susanne Muehlschlegel,NCT01024972
Dantrolene is a muscle relaxant that may ameliorate vascular muscle tone and limit vasospasm
Safety and pharmacokinetic evaluation of nitrite for prevention of cerebral vasospasm
Randomized, single-blind, parallel assignment safety study
Tier 1:sodium nitrite 32 nmol/kg/min Tier 2: sodium nitrite 48 nmol/kg/min Tier 3: sodium nitrite 64 nmol/kg/min
Placebo vehicle
18
Primary outcome: pharmacokinetics of 14-day sodium nitrite infusionSecondary outcomes: safety and efficacy
Edward Oldfield,NCT00873015
—
Effects of prostacyclin infusion on cerebral vessels and metabolism in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, parallel assignment, pharmacodynamics study
Tier 1:prostacyclin 1 ng/kg/min day 5–10 after SAH Tier 2: prostacyclin 2 ng/kg/min day 5–10 after SAH
Placebo, IV infusion day 5–10 after SAH
90
Primary outcome: vasospasm measured by CT perfusionSecondary outcomes: cerebral metabolism measured by microdialysis, 3-month GOS, clinical vasospasm, brain tissue oxygen, CT angio vasospasm, MAP, serum S100b
Rune Rasmussen, NCT01447095
Prostacyclin may cause vasodilation and ameliorate vasospasm
Hypertensive, hypervolemic therapy
Induced hypertension for treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal SAHHIMALAIA
Randomized, Single blind safety/efficacy study of patients with SAH and DCI (clinically defined)
Induced hypertension with vasopressors and fluids for 48 hours
No induced hypertension
240
Primary outcome: mRS at 3 monthsSecondary outcomes: proportion of treated patients who did not have clinical improvement of DCI symptoms within 24 hours, 30-day mortality, 3-month Barthel, SSQoL, hospital anxiety and depression scale, cognitive failures questionnaire, hospital complications, CTP results, medical costs
Arjen Slooter and Walter van den Bergh,NCT01613235
CBF measured in all patients using CTP at enrollment and 24–36 hours
Intensive management of pressure and volume expansion in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (IMPROVES)
Randomized, single-blind, factorial assignment
Tier 1: hypervolemia + conventional blood pressureTier 2: normovolemia + hypertension Tier 3: hypervolemia + hypertension
Normal volume, normal blood pressure
20
Primary outcome: achievement of hemodynamic goals in each group
Miriam Treggiari,NCT01414894
Though triple H is a common therapy, its safety and efficacy have not been well quantified
CSF diversion
EARLYDRAIN: outcome after early lumbar CSF: drainage in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, 2-arm controlled trial
Continuous lumbar CSF drainage of 120 mg qd × 7 d
Standard NICU care
300
Primary outcome: 6-month mRSSecondary outcomes: 6-month mortality, angiographic vasospasm, TCD vasospasm, shunt insertion rate at 6 months
Bardutzky J,NCT01258257
Lumbar drainage to remove blood from the basal cisterns may limit delayed cerebral ischemia
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage study
Randomized, open label, parallel assignment study of SAH patients requiring external ventricular drainage (EVD)
High volume CSF diversion (EVD at 5 mmHg) × 10 days
Conventional CSF diversion (EVD at 15 mm Hg), weaned at physician discretion
20
Primary outcome: 90-day mRSSecondary Outcome: radiologic infarction, TCD or angiographic vasospasm, shunt placement, ventriculitis, discharge mRS, 90 day mini-mental status exam, length of stay
Giuseppe Lanzino,NCT01420978
More aggressive CSF drainage may improve brain microcirculation and perfusion and lead to better neurological outcomes
Antiepileptics
Comparison of short duration levetiracetam to extended course for seizure prophylaxis after subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, prospective, open label, parallel assignment, phase III, safety/efficacy study
Levetiracetam 1000 mg BID × 3 days
Levetiracetam 1000 mg BID × hospital stay
460
Primary outcome: In hospital seizuresSecondary outcome: Incidence of seizure after hospital discharge, adverse drug reactions, length of stay, cognitive and functional outcomes
Rajat Dhar,NCT01137110
Antiepileptics can have long-term cognitive side effects. A short course may be just as efficacious as prolonged use
Antiepileptic drugs and vascular risk markers
Randomized, open label, parallel assignment study
Tier 1: phenytoin 5 mg/kg/d divided in 2 dosesTier 2: valproate 15 mg/kg/d divided in 3 doses Tier 3: levetiracetam 1000-1500 mg/d divided in 2 doses
No drug intervention
200
Primary outcome: serum cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, HDL, lipoprotein a, CRPSecondary outcome: acute seizures, late seizures, mRS at 8 and 16 weeks
Prema Kishna and Scott Mintzer,NCT00774306
Certain seizure medications may raise cholesterol levels and increase the risk of heart attack and stroke
Sedation
Effects of dexmedetomidine on inflammatory cytokines in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Randomized, open label, parallel assignment efficacy study
Dexmedetomidine 0.2–1.5 mcg/kg/h
Propofol 5–80 mcg/kg/min
10
Primary outcome: serum and CSF cytokines over 48 hoursSecondary outcomes: sedative and analgesic requirements, RASS and CAM-ICU scores, length of stay, delayed cerebral ischemia, GOSE at discharge
Shaun Keegan and Brittany Woolf,NCT01565590
Dexmedetomidine may cause less inflammation over time than propofol
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation of patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage
Nonrandomized, open label, parallel assignment
Early multidisciplinary rehab and mobilization
No intervention
160
Primary outcome: 10-week GOSSecondary outcome: 3–6 month and 12-month GOSE, functional independence measure, coma recovery scale, disability rating scale, High-level Mobility Assessment tool, pain score
Tanja Karic and Angelika Sorteberg,NCT01656317
Early rehab may reduce complications and improve physical and cognitive function after SAH
Blood pressure control
Safety and Efficacy Study of Clevidipine to Control Hypertension in Patients Admitted with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (CLASH)
Open label, safety, efficacy study, single group assignment (Phase 2)
Clevidipine IV 2–32 mg/h for 24–48 hours
NA
20
Primary: Blood pressure within target range
Panayiotis Varelas,NCT00978822
To assess how rapidly and safely Clevidipine can be used to control blood pressure in SAH patients.
Other
Cervical spinal cord stimulation for the prevention of cerebral vasospasm
Nonrandomized, open label
Spinal cord stimulation using MTS Trial System 3510
NA
12
Primary outcome: cerebral vasospasmSecondary outcome: adverse events
Konstantin Slavin, NCT00766844
—Table 4
Randomized controlled trials assessing neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest—ongoing trials.
Trial name
Studydesign
Treatmentgroup
Control group
Target enrollment
Outcome measure
PI
Comments
Neuroprotective drugs
Selenium to Improve Neurological Outcome after Cardiac Arrest (SCPR)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, phase 2a efficacy study
Sodium-selenite infusion × 7 days
Placebo
52
Primary outcome: neuron-specific enolaseSecondary outcomes: inflammation and oxidative stress markers, NIHSS and Glasgow Pittsburgh performance score at 6 months, selenium blood levels, glutathione peroxidase plasma levels
Vanessa Stadlbauer and Karlheinz Smolle,NCT01390506
Selenium can reduce oxidative stress after cardiac arrest and reduce inflammation
Magnesium
Clinical Study of the LRS ThermoSuit System in Post Arrest Patients with Intravenous Infusion of Magnesium Sulfate
Randomized, double-blind, parallel assignment, safety/efficacy study of any rhythm
Thermosuit to target 34°C plus magnesium sulfate IV (30 mg/kg over 15 minutes)
ThermoSuit to target 34°C plus placebo (normal saline)
14
Primary outcome: cooling rateSecondary outcomes: time to target temperature, percentage of time in target temperature range, shivering, length of stay, neurologic status at discharge and 6 months, adverse events, survival at 24 hours, discharge and 30 days
Michael Holzer and Andreas Janata, NCT00593164
Tests new device to achieve therapeutic hypothermia and the impact of magnesium on cooling performance and hemodynamics
Hypothermia
Target Temperature Management after Cardiac Arrest (TTM)
Randomized, double-blind, parallel assignment, multicenter, safety/efficacy trial for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Target temperature 36°C × 24 h
Target temperature 33°C × 24 h
850
Primary outcome: All cause mortalitySecondary outcomes: 6-month composite all cause mortality and poor neurological outcome by cerebral performance scale, bleeding, 6-month neurological status and quality of life, mRS, Cerebral performance scale, mini-mental test, IQCODE, SF-36, adverse events
Niklas Nielsen and Hans, Friberg NCT01020916
Attempts to identify optimal hypothermia target temperature
Hypothermia After in-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (HACAinhospital)
Randomized, single-blind, parallel assignment, single-center, safety/efficacy study for in-hospital arrests of any rhythm
Mild therapeutic hypothermia 32–34°C × 24 hours.
Standard care, no hypothermia
440
Primary outcome: all cause mortality at 6 monthsSecondary outcomes: 6 month Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance scale, in-hospital all-cause mortality
Sebastian Wolfrum and Volkhard Kurowski,NCT00457431
Tests whether hypothermia treatment will improve outcome after in-hospital arrest of any rhythm
Intra-arrest Therapeutic Hypothermia in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest (HITUPPAC-BIO)
Randomized, open label, parallel assignment, efficacy trial
Hypothermia induction prehospital
Hypothermia induction at hospital arrival
250
Primary outcomes: brain injury biomarkers at 72 hSecondary outcomes: ROSC, survival 72 h, GCS at 48 hours, cerebral performance scale at 28 days
Guillaume Debaty Jean Francois Timsit, NCT00886184
Assess utility of early hypothermia prehospital
Induction of Mild Hypothermia Following Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Randomized, open label, single group assignment, efficacy study of any rhythm out of hospital arrest
Rapid infusion of 2 L of 4°C normal saline prior to ED arrival
Standard therapy
1364
Primary outcome: awake and command following at hospital dischargeSecondary outcomes: days to awakening, days to death, 3 month neurological outcome
Francis Kim,NCT00391469
Tests whether rapid induction of hypothermia with cold saline infusion is efficacious
Comparing Therapeutic Hypothermia Using External and Internal Cooling for Post-Cardiac Arrest Patients
Randomized, open label, parallel assignment, efficacy trial
External device (Arctic Sun) induced hypothermia
Internal device (Alsius) induced hypothermia
51
Primary outcome: Survival to hospital dischargeSecondary outcome: 1 year neurological status
Marcus Ong, NCT00827957
Identifying the most efficient method of cooling may improve outcome after cardiac arrest
Hypothermia + ECMO
Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Treated with Mechanical CPR, Hypothermia, ECMO and Early Reperfusion (CHEER)
Nonrandomized, single group, open label, safety/efficacy trail for patients who fail standard resuscitation
Automated CPR, ECMO, coronary angiography, therapeutic hypothermia
NA
24
Primary outcome: survival to hospital dischargeSecondary outcomes: cerebral performance Scale, time to ECMO insertion, neurologic biomarkers, cardiac recovery
Stephen Bernard and Dion Stub, NCT01186614
Aggressive resuscitation may improve outcome in patients who fail standard resuscitation
Hyperinvasive approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using mechanical chest compression device, prehospital intraarrest cooling, extracorporeal Life support and early Invasive assessment compared to standard of care: Prague OHCA Study
Randomized, open-label, parallel group, safety/efficacy study
Prehospital mechanical compression device, intraarrest cooling and in hospital ECLS (compression device, Rhinochill, PLS ECMO)
Standard care
170
Primary outcome: composite endpoint of survival with good neurological outcome (cerebral performance scale)Secondary outcome: 30 day cerebral performance scale, 30 day cardiac recovery
Jan Belohlavek and Ondrej Smid,NCT01511666
Aggressive, early intervention may improve cerebral outcomes
Emergency Preservation and Resuscitation (EPR) for Cardiac Arrest from Trauma (EPR-CAT)
Nonrandomized, open label, parallel assignment, safety/efficacy study
Profound hypothermia < 10°C with cold saline infusion into aorta followed by resuscitation/rewarming with cardiopulmonary bypass
Standard treatment
20
Primary outcome: survival to hospital discharge without major disability by GOSESecondary outcomes: achieving target temperature in 1 hour, 28 day survival, 6 month neurological function, multiple organ system dysfunction
Samuel Tisherman,NCT01042015
Resuscitation technique for trauma patients that have arrested from exsanguination
HypotherMia + xenon
Effect of xenon and therapeutic hypothemia on brain and on neuroloigcal outcome following brain ischemia in cardiac arrest patients (Xe-hypotheca)
Randomzied, open label, parallel assignment, phase 2 safety/efficacy trial for ventricular fibrillation and nonperfusing ventricular tachycardia
Hypothermia 33°C × 24 h and Xenon inhalation × 24 hours target end tidal 40%
Hypothermia 33°C × 24 h
110
Primary outcome: PET and MRI ischemia at 24 hours and 10 daysSecondary outcomes: neurological outcome at 6 months, TTE
Timo Laitio,NCT00879892
Xenon may be synergistically neuroprotective in combination with hypothermia post arrest by limiting cerebral hypoxia, neuronal loss, and mitochondrial dysfunction
Chest compresions
Continuous chest compressions
Randomized, open label, multicenter, crossover assignment study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of any rhythm
Continuous chest compressions
Interrupted chest compressions with ventilation 30 : 2
23600
Primary outcome: survival to hospital dischargeSecondary outcomes: mRS at discharge, adverse events
Myron Weisfeldt,NCT01372748
Continuous CPR without interruption for ventilation may be superior to interrupted compression with ventilation ratio of 30 : 2
LUCAS chest compressor versus manual chest compression in out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest: LUCAT trial
Randomized, open label, parallel assignment, efficacy study
Mechanical continuous chest compressions performed by LUCAS device
Manual chest compressions
400
Primary outcome: survival to hospital admission, survival to discharge with good neurological state by cerebral performance ScaleSecondary outcomes: ROSC, end tidal CO2, SOFA scale, length of stay, metabolic and inflammatory markers, LV function
Francesc Carmona Jimenez, Rosa-Maria Lidon,NCT01521208
Mechanical chest compression may be superior to manual chest compression
Cerebral oxygenation
Cerebral Oxygenation in Cardiac Arrest and Hypothermia
Open label, safety and efficacy study
Near-infrared monitoring
Standard therapy, no monitoring
70
Primary outcome: survival to dischargeSecondary outcomes: cerebral performance scale at discharge and 12 months
Christian Storm, NCT01531426
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) could be a new-noninvasive marker for outcome after cardiac arrest. Low NIRS may correlate with poor outcome


## 3.2. Interventions Studied

The main hypothetical mechanisms of intervention tested in published SAH trials were related to treating or preventing delayed cerebral ischemia (N=40, 70%), preventing aneurysm rebleeding (N=5, 9%), improving aneurysm repair technique (N=5, 9%), improving fluid balance (N=2, 4%), and others (N=3, 5%). Among ongoing SAH trials, mechanisms of study include treating or preventing delayed cerebral ischemia (N=19, 76%), limiting rebleeding (N=1, 4%), improving aneurysm repair (N=1, 4%), seizure control (N=2, 8%), and other (N=2, 8%). There are no published or ongoing SAH clinical trials that focus on treating acute brain injury after aneurysm rupture.Conversely, the main mechanisms of intervention studied inpublishedcardiac arrest trials focused on acute intervention to treat and limit early brain injury. All 46 (100%) published cardiac arrest trials focused on the acute time frame (first few hours) after cardiac arrest. Interventions studied included decreasing cerebral metabolic demand with hypothermia or barbiturate (N=6, 13%), high-quality chest compressions or pressor use to return cerebral blood flow (N=16, 35%), electrolyte/metabolic optimization with calcium, magnesium, sodium bicarbonate or insulin administration (N=12, 26%), neuroprotective drugs including calcium channel blockers (N=5, 11%), thrombolysis to treat the underlying cause of cardiac arrest (N=2, 4%) and other (N=5, 11%). Among ongoing cardiac arrest trials, mechanisms of study include decreasing cerebral metabolic demand with hypothermia (N=9, 64%), high-quality chest compressions to return cerebral blood flow (N=2, 14%) electrolyte/metabolic optimization with magnesium (N=1, 7%), neuroprotective drugs (N=1, 7%), and monitoring cerebral oxygenation (N=1, 7%). A detailed list of interventions from published and ongoing studies in both the SAH and cardiac arrest population are listed in Table 5.Table 5
Number of randomized, controlled trials published and ongoing for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and cardiac arrest.
Intervention
SAH
Cardiac arrest
PublishedN (%)
OngoingN (%)
PublishedN (%)
OngoingN (%)
Calcium channel blockers
10 (18)
0
4 (9)
0
Antifibrinolytics
5 (9)
0
0
0
Neuroprotective drugs
5 (9)
2 (8)
1 (2)
1 (7)
Statins
4 (7)
5 (20)
0
0
Aneurysm clip or coil
4 (7)
1 (4)
NA
NA
Lipid peroxidation inhibitor
4 (7)
1 (4)
0
0
Thrombolytics
3 (5)
1 (4)
2 (4)
0
Antiplatelets
3 (5)
0
0
0
Steroids
3 (5)
0
1 (2)
0
Transfusion/blood products/erythropoietin
3 (5)
1 (4)
0
0
Vasodilators
3 (5)
4 (16)
0
0
Pressors or HHH
2 (4)
2 (8)
9 (19.5)
0
Magnesium
2 (4)
0
5 (11)
1 (7)
Rho-kinase inhibitor (fasudil)
2 (4)
0
0
0
Adrenergic blockade
1 (2)
0
0
0
Endovascular therapy
1 (2)
0
NA
NA
Insulin/glucose control
1 (2)
0
2 (4)
0
Hypothermia
1 (2)
0
5 (11)
9 (64)
CSF diversion
0
2 (8)
0
0
Antiepileptics
0
2 (8)
0
0
Sedation
0
1 (4)
0
0
Rehabilitation
0
1 (4)
0
0
Blood pressure
0
1 (4)
0
0
Other
0
1 (4)
0
0
Chest compressions
NA
NA
7 (15)
2 (14)
Adenosine antagonist
0
0
1 (2)
0
Fluid management
0
0
1 (2)
0
Barbiturate
0
0
1 (2)
0
Cerebral oxygenation
0
0
0
1 (7)
Calcium chloride
0
0
3 (7)
0
Sodium bicarbonate
0
0
2 (4)
0
Hemofiltration
0
0
1 (2)
0
Rhythm analysis
0
0
1 (2)
0
Total
57
25
46
14


## 3.3. Outcome Measures

The most common neurological outcomes assessed in the SAH trials were delayed cerebral ischemia (N=24, 42%), functional outcome (Glasgow outcome scale, modified Rankin scale or functional outcome scale, N=24, 42%), angiographic or transcranial Doppler vasospasm (N=6, 11%), and death (N=4, 7%). Among cardiac arrest trials, the most often assessed neurological outcomes were the Pittsburgh cerebral performance score (N=18, 40%), Glasgow outcome score or modified Rankin Score (N=4, 9%), Glasgow coma score (N=4, 9%), awakening and command following (N=3, 7%), cognitive or neuropsychological testing (N=1, 2%), “disability” (N=1, 2%), death (N=13, 30%), discharge disposition (N=1, 2%) and others (N=1, 2%).


## 3.4. Trial Results

Of the clinical trials reviewed for SAH, 30% (17/57) showed that the intervention tested had a statistically significant impact on neurological outcome or mortality. These include studies of nimodipine [4–6, 8, 110], phase II data for nicardipine implants during aneurysm clipping [13], the neuroprotectants edavarone [21] and nizofenone [20], pravastatin [25], early aneurysm surgery [28], endovascular coiling [29–31], cilostazol [41], methylprednisolone [44], erythropoietin [45], and fasudil [57, 58]. Similarly, 30% (17/57) of studies showed a positive impact on delayed cerebral ischemia, infarction, angiographic or TCD vasospasm, though there was incomplete overlap with the above studies that showed outcome benefit. Eight studies found both a significant improvement in delayed cerebral ischemia/vasospasm/infarction and outcome including studies of nimodipine [4, 6, 8], nicardipine implants in the basal cistern [13], edavarone [21], pravastatin [25], fasudil [57], and erythropoietin [45]. Nine studies found a benefit for decreasing delayed cerebral ischemia/vasospasm/infarction but no neurologic outcome benefit including studies of IV nicardipine [10, 11], eicosapentaenoic acid (omega-3 fatty acid) [22], the neuroprotectant NA-1 [23], simvastatin [24], tirilazad [34], intracisternal rTPA [36, 38], and clazosentan [49, 50]. Three studies found improved neurologic outcome despite an insignificant effect on delayed cerebral ischemia/vasospasm/infarction including studies of cilostazol [41], methylprednisolone [44], and fasudil [58].Among the cardiac arrest trials, 13% (6/46) demonstrated neurologic or mortality benefit. Improved mortality rates were demonstrated with mild therapeutic hypothermia [89], coenzyme Q10 [68], vasopressin plus epinephrine plus methylprednisolone [71], active compression-decompression CPR [93], and hemofiltration [108].  Improved neurological outcome was demonstrated with early mild therapeutic hypothermia for ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia arrests [88, 89], and one study of active compression-decompression CPR [93], though a larger study of active compression-decompression was negative [94].


## 3.5. Trial Overlap

Though nimodipine has demonstrated mortality and functional outcome benefit in SAH [4–6, 8, 110], it has shown no benefit in cardiac arrest trials [64, 65, 67]. Similarly, intracisternal thrombolysis showed some benefit in reducing delayed cerebral ischemia and infarction after SAH [36, 38], but intravenous tenecteplase showed no long-term benefit and, in fact, increased intracranial hemorrhage after cardiac arrest [69, 70]. Neither magnesium [53, 54, 81–85] nor intensive insulin [59, 87] has proven beneficial after SAH or cardiac arrest. Though hypothermia [88, 89] has been the single most effective treatment for cardiac arrest (the number needed to treat to prevent one death is 7 and the number needed to treat to produce favorable neurological outcome is 6), it has not proven useful in the context of aneurysm surgery after SAH [60]. There is little mechanistic overlap in ongoing randomized, controlled trials of SAH and cardiac arrest patients.


## 4. Discussion

In this paper, a direct comparison is made between randomized, controlled clinical trials that evaluate mortality or neurologic outcome after SAH and cardiac arrest. Though 28% of SAH studies showed some neurologic outcome benefit in the intervention group, only nimodipine [4–6, 8, 110], fasudil [57, 58], and endovascular coiling [29–31] have been found to consistently improve outcome in multiple, multi-center randomized controlled trials. Smaller studies [8, 41, 58], single center [21, 44], or phase II safety and feasibility studies [13, 25, 45] have shown outcome benefit, but still require larger efficacy trials before integration into standard practice. Among cardiac arrest trials, only mild therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to improve both mortality and neurologic outcome [88, 89]. Little overlap in trial results or mechanisms of study was identified in these different patient populations.Methodological differences in the timing, duration, neurological severity, and outcomes studied may explain some of the differences in trial results between SAH and cardiac arrest populations. First, the timing of intervention for SAH and cardiac arrest trials is quite different. With the exception of aneurysm repair and aneurysm rebleeding trials (some of which were carried out in the era of delayed surgical treatment), the vast majority of SAH trials focus on the delayed cerebral ischemia period. Conversely, all cardiac arrest trials are directed at intervening against early brain injury.  The difference in time frames studied may explain, in part, the variable results for mild therapeutic hypothermia in each population. Unlike the cardiac arrest trials, which applied hypothermia either prior to ED arrival [88] or within a median of 105 minutes from return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) [89] for a duration of 12–24 hours, hypothermia was applied in the IHAST trial at a median of two days from SAH onset and only for a brief time (median 5-6 hours) [60]. Second, patient selection may result in variable trial results for hypothermia. For example, hypothermia for cardiac arrest was used for comatose survivors, while relatively neurologically intact patients (WFNS I–III) were studied in the IHAST trial. Finally, outcome measures differ in the cardiac arrest and SAH literature. Many cardiac trials measure 30-day or discharge mortality or neurologic outcome, while SAH trials measure outcomes from 3 months to 1 year. Though the majority of cardiac arrest trials measure neurologic outcome using the Pittsburgh cerebral performance scale, while SAH trials utilize the Glasgow outcome scale or modified Rankin scale, all of these scales are very similar and provide gross estimates of disability. Despite the aforementioned methodological differences, certain interventions, such as magnesium and intensive insulin, have not proven effective in either population.Another reason for variable outcome in clinical trials may be due to pathophysiological differences in SAH and cardiac arrest. Though early brain injury in SAH may mechanistically mirror the cascade of injury occurring after cardiac arrest, SAH differs from cardiac arrest in that it is not a monophasic disease. Break down of blood products initiates a distinctive series of delayed clinical events that characteristically can lead to ischemia or infarction between SAH days 3–14. The fact that nimodipine has been so successful in SAH trials, but shown no effect at similar doses in cardiac arrest trials suggests it is acting on a distinct pathway. Indeed, the absolute risk reduction for poor outcome after SAH in a meta-analysis of 16 trials of nimodipine is 5.3% with a number needed to treat for benefit of 19 [111]. No such signal for benefit was seen in cardiac arrest trials [64, 65, 67]. The mechanism of beneficial effect of nimodipine in SAH has been widely debated and may be related to its effect on fibrinolysis [112], spreading cortical depression [113], or excitotoxicity. Though nimodipine improves ischemic neurological deficits by clinical criteria and CT-documented infarction (with a pooled relative risks of 0.66 (95% CI 0.59–0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.70–0.87), resp.) [111], it has little effect on angiographic vasospasm or cerebral blood flow [4, 5]. The corollary to this observation is that interventions that improve angiographic vasospasm, such as clazosentan, do not necessarily improve cerebral infarction or outcome. [49, 50, 114, 115]. While angiographic vasospasm seems to be related to infarction [116], other mechanisms may play a role in neurological deficits, cerebral infarction, and outcome. Such pathophysiological differences may make extrapolation of results from cardiac arrest trials to an SAH population problematic. Indeed, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) may blunt the positive effect of hypothermia on early brain injury. Further animal research may better identify mechanistic differences of early brain injury in cardiac arrest and SAH.Despite a second wave of neurological injury in SAH, poor-grade (Hunt Hess 4-5) SAH patients, who are at higher risk for secondary neurological injury, still have comparable, if not better, outcomes compared to cardiac arrest patients who are not cooled. Among Hunt-Hess grade 4-5 patients, the 12-month mortality rate with aggressive treatment is 43%, while 40% had no or slight-moderate disability (mRS 0–3) [117]. By comparison, the 6-month death rate in the control (nonhypothermia) group of the HACA trial was 55%, while good neurologic outcome (defined as Pittsburgh cerebral performance scale 1-2; good outcome or moderate disability) occurred in 26–39% [88, 89]. We have additionally shown that DCI does not predict mortality after SAH with aggressive vasospasm treatment, while early brain injury (measured by Hunt-Hess grade) does [1]. Thus, despite secondary neurologic insults and delayed cerebral ischemia risk, poor-grade SAH patients do at least as well as normothermic cardiac arrest patients, who may face risks to survival and functional outcome related to the underlying cause of the cardiac arrest. Also, the median age of cardiac arrest patients tends to be older than SAH patients, which may also explain why even the sickest SAH patients have relatively good outcomes by comparison. If nihilism can be overcome in the management of poor-grade SAH patients, the early application of mild therapeutic hypothermia may improve outcomes further.There are some limitations to this review that should be mentioned. A medical librarian was not used and only MEDLINE/PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov were used to identify literature for review. An Embase search was not performed.  Additionally, an exhaustive search for all neurologic outcome based RCTs was not performed, rather only English studies in humans were included.In conclusion, while the mechanisms of early brain injury after SAH and cardiac arrest may be similar, the preponderance of SAH clinical trials do not focus on interventions addressing early brain injury. Clinical trials in SAH assessing interventions that have proven successful in the cardiac arrest literature, such as early mild therapeutic hypothermia, are warranted.



---

*Source: 263974-2013-03-07.xml*