# Enhanced Light Harvesting in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Using External Lightguide

Authors: Chi-Hui Chien; Ming-Lang Tsai; Chi-Chang Hsieh; Yan-Huei Li
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

An external lightguide (EL) for enhancing the light-harvesting efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) was designed and developed. The EL attached to the exterior of a DSSC photoelectrode directed light on a dye-covered nanoporous TiO2 film (D-NTF) of the photoelectrode. Experimental tests confirmed that the EL increased the light-harvesting efficiency of a DSSC with an active area of 0.25 cm2 by 30.69%. Photocurrent density and the power conversion efficiency were also increased by 38.12% and 25.09%, respectively.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have been extensively studied in recent years [1–3], owing to their potentially cost-effective and easy mass production characteristics. A DSSC comprises four key components, which are the photoelectrode [4, 5], a platinum (Pt) counterelectrode [6, 7] deposited opposite the photoelectrode, an electrolyte solution [5, 6] containing an iodide/tri-iodide redox couple between the photo- and counterelectrodes, and a sealing spacer [8, 9] to fix the space between the photo- and counterelectrodes and to seal the electrolyte solution. The photoelectrode designed to support light-to-electricity conversion is normally formed from a dye-covered nanoporous TiO2 film (D-NTF) that is fabricated on a transparent conducting substrate. Excitation of the dye by light illuminating the D-NTF of the photoelectrode causes a rapid injection of electrons into the conduction band of the TiO2 and their further movement toward the transparent conducting substrate. However, the light also penetrates the sealing spacer, eventually exiting the cell. The light illuminating the D-NTF is therefore captured, whereas the light illuminating the sealing spacer is wasted. This phenomenon is evident in a grid-type DSSC [10, 11]. In the study by Lee et al. [10] and Ramasamy et al. [11], the use of multiple sealing spacers to seal each cell separately resulted in excessive light penetration into the sealing spacers, which rendered them unusable. Restated, the light-harvesting efficiency of the DSSC can be enhanced by directing the light toward the D-NTF before it illuminates the sealing spacer. Therefore, this work proposes a transparent external lightguide (EL) that improves the photovoltaic performance of the DSSC by directing light toward the D-NTF.


## 2. EL Design

Figure1 shows that, in an illuminated DSSC, some light received by the D-NTF of the photoelectrode (PE) is absorbed by the dye. Some light also penetrates the photoelectrode (PE), the sealing spacers (SS), and the counterelectrode (CE), in that order, before finally exiting the cell. Hence, the light illuminating the sealing spacer was wasted. To obtain a high light-harvesting efficiency, this study used an external lightguide (EL) made of a transparent medium to direct the light toward the D-NTF. To maximize the intensity of light received by the D-NTF, the EL is designed to minimize optical loss along all trajectories of incoming light. Accordingly, the EL exploits both normal incidence and total internal reflection (TIR). The normal incidence condition ensures that the light travels from medium 1 into medium 2 with the lowest possible reflection loss. The TIR condition ensures that the light travels from medium 1 into medium 2 without transmission loss. Figure 2 presents an EL architecture that satisfies both conditions. The figure clearly reveals that the EL has a symmetric prism structure whose geometry is defined by two optical angles (θa and θb) and four optical interfaces (S1, S2, S3, and S4). The trajectories of rays 1 and 2 clearly show that this design meets the normal incidence condition as light travels through the air and enters the EL. When the light travels from EL into air across interfaces S1 and S2, TIR occurs, ensuring an absence of transmission loss. Hence, the incident angle θ1 should satisfy the TIR condition. The θ1 for TIR is obtained by the Snell's law:(1)θ1>sin⁡-1⁡(1nEL),
where nEL is the refractive index of the EL. After the light rays are reflected from interfaces S1 and S2, they are normally incident at interfaces S3 and S4, respectively, which maximizes transmittance and minimizes reflection loss. Based on the θ1 for TIR and the normal incidence at interfaces S3 and S4, the optical angles θa and θb, respectively, of the symmetric prism structure are obtained using the following formulae(2)θa=90°-θ1,(3)θb=2θ1-90°.
According to the above equations, the symmetric prism design depends on θ1. The EL on the exterior of the DSSC photoelectrode effectively directs the light toward the D-NTF (Figure 3). Light arriving at the D-NTF has the highest possible intensity since the transmittance of light traveling from the EL into the air is maximized.Figure 1
Illumination of  DSSC.Figure 2
Proposed EL architecture.Figure 3
Illustration of EL in directing light toward D-NTF.Notably, the above EL is most effective when light is normally incident onto the EL. Figure4 shows an example of the oblique illumination (by ray 3) of the EL at an incident angle of θi. A transmission loss occurs at interface S1 because the incident angle θ2 is smaller than the θ1 for TIR. This phenomenon occurs if θi exceeds 0°. To ensure that obliquely incident light can also be directed toward the D-NTF with minimal optical loss, θ2 must also satisfy the TIR condition, which requires modification of θ1. Figure 4 shows that θ1 can be reformulated as(4)θ1=θ2+θr,
where θr is the angle of refraction, which can be obtained by Snell's law:(5)θr=sin⁡-1⁡(sin⁡⁡θinEL).
According to equations (4) and (5) and where θ2 satisfies the TIR condition,(6)θ1>sin⁡-1⁡(1nEL)+sin⁡-1⁡(sin⁡⁡θinEL).
According to equations (2) and (6), θi increases as θ1 increases and as θa decreases. The decrease in θa reduces the reflective area at interfaces S1 and S2 as well as the light-harvesting efficiency. Therefore, θi must be maintained at a suitable value. This study sets θi to 30°, which illuminated the EL at an incident angle between 0° and 30°. The resulting TIR at interfaces S1 and S2 prevented transmission loss. The refractive index nEL is a function of wavelength; that is,the index is high at short wavelengths and low at long wavelengths. The EL was designed to have a low refractive index at a long wavelength of 800 nm to ensure that light with wavelength shorter than 800 nm would undergo TIR at interfaces S1 and S2.Figure 4
Example of oblique illumination of the EL at an incident angle ofθi.


## 3. EL Fabrication

The EL was fabricated from UV-curable acrylic resin, which cures rapidly and is easily released from the mold. For mass production, however, non-UV-curable acrylic resin would be preferable. Ellipsometer measurements of the cured acrylic resin showed a refractive index of 1.496 at a wavelength of 800 nm. The EL had a width of 3 mm wide, which was the same as that of the sealing spacer. Table1 shows the values for θ1, θa, and θb, which were calculated by equations (2), (3), and (6), respectively. Notably, the calculated θ1 is a lowest limiting value. Table 1 also shows how the analysis compensated for errors in machining the EL mold. The calculated θ1 plus a compensation value of 1°, the calculated θa minus a compensation value of 1°, and the calculated θb plus a compensation value of 2.4° are referred to as “compensated data.” The compensated data were used to design an EL mold 65 mm wide, 20 mm high, and 100 mm long. The two-cavity EL mold was fabricated by a wire-cut machining method, and the mold was polished to a mirror-like surface. Figure 5 is a photograph of the EL mold, which clearly reveals that the mold had a machining error smaller than 0.05°, which was much smaller than the compensation value of 1°.Table 1
Values forθ1, θa, and θb obtained by equations (2), (3), and (6), respectively.
Dataθ1θaθbCalculated61.473°28.527°32.546°Compensated62.473°27.527°34.946°Photographs of top (a) and cross-section (b) of EL mold.
(a)(b)Acrylic resin was infused into the EL mold, which was then placed in a vacuum chamber to remove the air bubbles from the resin. A glass plate was placed on the top of the EL mold to level the acrylic resin. After the resin cured, the glass plate was removed, and the EL was released from the mold. The EL was divided into several sections (Figure6) to match the area of the D-NTF.Figure 6
Photograph of ELs.


## 4. Measurement of Light-Harvesting Efficiency

In Figure3, the EL was used to direct light toward the D-NTF of the photoelectrode. Therefore, the analysis of the light-harvesting efficiency focused on the D-NTF, and the experimental model of the DSSC that was utilized in measuring the light-harvesting efficiency was simplified by including only the photoelectrode. The experimental system that is presented in Figure 7 was established to investigate the light-harvesting efficiency of the photoelectrode with the ELs. The experimental system comprised (i) a solar power meter, (ii) a solar simulator, (iii) an FTO glass substrate, and (iv) ELs. The solar power meter measured the solar light intensity, and its light-absorbing detector (area: 0.5 × 0.5 cm2) could be used as a D-NTF. The solar simulator, which was capable of simulating AM 1.5 solar radiation, was adjusted to 1000 W/m2, which is equivalent to one sun illumination. The FTO glass substrate deposited on the solar power detector served as the photoelectrode. The ELs were then arranged on the FTO glass substrate to investigate the variations in light intensity displays by using the solar power meter. The light-harvesting efficiency of the photoelectrode with the ELs is obtained by calculation from the variations in light intensity.Figure 7
Experimental system for investigating light-harvesting efficiency.Figure8 presents the light intensity variations of the photoelectrode with and without the EL. Under one sun illumination of 1000 W/m2 (AM 1.5), the photoelectrode without the EL yielded an intensity of 831 W/m2 on the detector as the D-NTF. Depositing one EL on the FTO glass substrate of the photoelectrode increased intensity to 958 W/m2 and light-harvesting efficiency by 15.28%. When the number of ELs was increased to two, intensity increased to 1086 W/m2, and light-harvesting efficiency increased by 30.69%. As noted above, incorporating an EL effectively directed light toward the D-NTF of the photoelectrode, which enhanced light-harvesting efficiency.Figure 8
Variations in light intensity of photoelectrode with and without EL under one sun illumination of 1000 W/m2 (AM 1.5).


## 5. Preparation of DSSC

The photoelectrode was fabricated as follows. First, an acetic solution was prepared by mixing 2 g citric acid, 0.08 mL acetylacetone, 0.2 mL Triton X-100, and 0.2 mL tetrabutyl orthotitanate in 3 mL purified water and stirring for 30 min. Then, a TiO2 paste was prepared by mixing 1 g TiO2 nanopowder (P25, Degussa) with acetic solution and stirring for 1 h. The nanoporous TiO2 film was obtained by coating an FTO glass substrate (Hartford Glass Co., USA, fluorine-doped SnO2 overlayer, sheet resistance: 7 Ω/sq) with TiO2 paste using a doctor-blade method and then sintering at 450°C for 30 min. After sintering, measurement of the nanoporous TiO2 film with an Alpha-Step profilometer revealed a thickness of approximately 15 μm. The active area was 0.5 × 0.5 cm2.The photoelectrode was then soaked in a dye solution of 0.3 mM N719 dye in ethanol for 24 h at room temperature. The photoelectrode and the Pt counterelectrode were separated using a 60μm-thick (before melting) surlyn polymer foil (Solaronix) as a sealing spacer. Sealing was performed by keeping the structure in a hot-press at 100°C for a few seconds. The final step of the DSSC preparation was adding an electrolyte solution of 0.05 M iodine, 0.1 M lithium iodide, 0.5 M 4-tert-butylpyridine (TBP), and 0.3 M 1,2-dimethyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide (DMPII) in 3-methoxy propionitrile (MPN) into the cell gap.


## 6. Photovoltaic Measurements of DSSC with and without EL

To study the difference between the performance of DSSC with and without the EL, one EL and two ELs were attached to the exterior of the DSSC photoelectrode, respectively, as shown in Figure9. The photovoltaic performance of DSSC was measured using a computer-controlled digital source meter (Keithley, Model: 2400) with an external bias applied to the cell under one sun illumination with a power density of 1000 W/m2 (AM 1.5 simulated solar radiation). Figure 10 plots photocurrent density versus voltage for DSSC with and without the EL. Table 2 presents the corresponding photovoltaic performance. Under one sun illumination of 1000 W/m2 (AM 1.5), the DSSC without the EL had an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.685 V, a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 6.90 mA/cm2, a fill factor (FF) of 0.591, and a power conversion efficiency (η) of 2.79%. One EL improved the Jsc and η of the DSSC to 8.04 mA/cm2 and 3.16%, which were improvements of 16.52% and 13.26%, respectively. Two ELs increased Jsc and η to 9.53 mA/cm2 and 3.49%, which were increases of 38.12% and 25.09%, respectively. The light-harvesting efficiency increased with the photocurrent density and the power conversion efficiency. The increase in light-harvesting efficiency had a strong effect on the DSSC photocurrent density.Table 2
Photovoltaic performance of DSSC with and without EL.
DSSCJsc (mA/cm2)Voc (V)FFη (%)Without EL6.900.6850.5912.79With one EL8.040.6760.5813.16With two ELs9.530.6870.5333.49Photographs of DSSC with one EL (a) and two ELs (b).
(a)(b)Figure 10
Photocurrent density-voltage curves of DSSC without EL (black triangle), with one EL (blue square), and with two ELs (red circle).


## 7. Conclusion

In summary, a transparent external lightguide (EL) was designed to improve the light-harvesting efficiency of a dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC). DSSCs with and without the EL were experimentally compared. The results indicate that the EL effectively directed light on the dye-covered nanoporous TiO2 film (D-NTF) of the photoelectrode, which enhanced light-harvesting efficiency, photocurrent density, and power conversion efficiency in the DSSC. Additionally, experimental results indicate that although the EL is applicable to low-efficiency, cost-effective DSSCs, its application to high-efficiency DSSCs is not limited. In future studies, the authors will consider potential applications of the EL in high-efficiency DSSCs, grid-type DSSCs, and other solar cell devices.



---

*Source: 261828-2011-09-29.xml*