# Application of Microsatellite Loci for Molecular Identification of Elite Genotypes, Analysis of Clonality, and Genetic Diversity in AspenPopulus tremula L. (Salicaceae)

Authors: Dmitry V. Politov; Maryana M. Belokon; Yuri S. Belokon; Tatyana A. Polyakova; Anna V. Shatokhina; Elena A. Mudrik; Anna B. Azarova; Mikhail V. Filippov; Konstantin A. Shestibratov
Journal: International Journal of Plant Genomics
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Testing systems for molecular identification of micropropagated elite aspen (Populus tremula L.) genotypes were developed on the base on microsatellite (SSR) loci. Out of 33 tested microsatellite loci, 14 were selected due to sustainable PCR amplification and substantial variability in elite clones of aspen aimed for establishment of fast-rotated forest plantations. All eight tested clones had different multilocus genotypes. Among 114 trees from three reference native stands located near the established plantations, 80 haplotypes were identified while some repeated genotypes were attributed to natural clones which appeared as a result of sprouting. The selected set of SSR markers showed reliable individual identification with low probability of appearance of identical aspen genotypes (a minimum of 4.8·10-10 and 1 × 10−4 for unrelated and related individuals, resp.). Case studies demonstrating practical applications of the test system are described including analysis of clonal structure and levels of genetic diversity in three natural aspen stands growing in the regions where plantations made of elite clones were established.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The continued degradation of native forests worldwide due to the overexploitation requires introduction of intensive forms of forestry that would favor not only economic effect but also conservation of woody plant genetic resources. This task declares obtaining and maintenance of elite genotypes of forest trees aimed for fast-rotated forest plantations. New highly productive and sustainable to abiotic factors, pests and pathogens cultivars and varieties appear as a result of breeding, selection of mutations, and/or genetic engineering. The clonal propagation of such outstanding individuals ensures fixation of their useful traits both for further breeding experiments and for establishment of targeted forest plantations. In particular, microclonal propagation viain vitro culture allows for rapid, large-scale, and cost-effective cloning of individuals with desired traits especially when traditional budding or grafting is impossible or requires special efforts [1–3].Since morphologically and anatomically different plant clones may look similar, it is essential to reliably identify those including discrimination from each other and from conspecific individuals or representatives of other closely related species. In forestry, the problem of individual identification is especially crucial since the external look of trees is highly dependable on environmental parameters [4]. At particular stages of natural ontogenesis of forest trees, for example, seedlings and saplings, and especially as calluses or explantsin vitro cell culture, individuals may be indiscernible not only individually but also as far as species diagnoses are concerned. Long generation time and ontogenetically late maturation makes the task of genetic passportization of elite clones in woody plants real. The complex multistage process of obtaining, propagation, and introduction of elite cultivars by breeding or genetic engineering increases the probability of various errors.Molecular genetic markers (MGM) proved to be very efficient tools for individual identification. Among different MGM classes microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSR) fit best to requirements of testing systems for identification due to their specificity, codominance, selective neutrality, sufficient allelic richness, and heterozygosity caused by high mutation rate. Moreover, due to relative genome conservatism within genera and families of plants, SSR-markers and PCR primers for their amplification can be transferrable from one taxon to another.In several poplar species, the successful DNA fingerprinting and differentiation of clones, cultivars, and varieties were demonstrated by molecular markers including SSR loci [5–9].In this paper we report on the development of SSR-based testing system for molecular genetic identification of elite micropropagated genotypes of aspen,Populus tremula L., aimed at the establishment of fast-growing target forest plantations in several regions of Russian Federation and present the results of its application for individual genotypes discrimination, studies of clonal structure in natural aspen stands, and estimation of genetic variability in populations.


## 2. Material and Methods

The development of the testing system for the identification of elite genotypes comprised the selection of a specific marker set fitting the requirements of high-resolution discrimination of clones and testing its reliability and identification power on a set of elite genotypes and a sufficient number of representatives of a studied species.


### 2.1. Plant Material

Elite aspen and hybrid clones used for development of testing systems for molecular identification have been obtained from micropropagated cell cultures [10] maintained in the Pushchino branch of Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences (Pushchino, Russia). Origin and short description of eight clones are presented in Table 1.Table 1
Elite aspen and hybrid clones and their characteristics.
Original genotype
Putative species/hybrid identity
Origin
Description
Clones and clonal lineages obtained based on original genotypes
PtV22
PutativelyPopulus tremula
Minsk Oblast, Belarus, breeding form obtained in Institute of Forest, National Academy of Belarus, Gomel, Belarus, provided by V. E. Padutov
Diploid green-bark aspen form. Characterized by fast growth and resistance to heart rot caused by pathogen fungusPhellinus tremula
Ptv22-1, Ptv22-2, Ptv22-3, 21mut, 2mut, 14mut, 4mut, 12mut
Pt
P. tremula
Leningrad Oblast, Russia, breeding form obtained in St. Petersburg Research Institute for Forestry, provided by  D. A. Shabunin
Diploid giant aspen form. Characterized by fast growth and resistance to heart rot caused by pathogen fungusPhellinus tremula
Pt2, Pt3
F2
P. tremula
Kostroma Oblast, Russia, breeding form obtained by S. N. Bagayev, provided by D. A. Shabunin
Diploid female clone. Highly productive (plus 51% by sum of stem cross section squares and plus 43% by growing stock). Increased wood density of 475 kg/m3[11]
F2-1, F2-2, F2-3
47
P. tremula
Latvian State Forest Research Institute “Silava,” Latvia, provided by Dr. Arnis Gailis
Diploid aspen form. Productivity of 180–200 m3/haat age 12 under density of 1100 stems/ha. Characterized by resistance to heart rot caused by pathogen fungus Phellinus tremula[12]
47-1, 47-1-1-31, 47-1-1-22, 47-1-2-27, 47-1-1-19, 47-1-2-53
С-control
P. tremuloides × P. tremula
-“-
Diploid hybrid form. Productivity of 180–200 m3/ha at age 12 under density of 1100 stems/ha [12]
С-1, С-2, С-3
23
P. tremuloides × P. tremula
-“-
Diploid hybrid form. Maximal productivity of 200–250 m3/ha demonstrated at age 12 under density of 1100 stems/ha [12]. High wood density
L23-1, L23-2, L23-3
4
P. tremuloides × P. tremula
-“-
Maximal productivity of 250–300 m3/ha demonstrated at age 12 under density of 2500 stems/ha [12]
L4-1, L4-2, L4-3
No. 3-understory
P. tremula
Republic of Tatarstan, breeding form by A. H. Gaziulllin, provided by N. R. Garipov
Triploid aspen form. Characterized by fast growth and resistance to heart rot caused by pathogen fungusPhellinus tremula
No. 3-understory-1Experimental aspen clonal plantations derived from these elite genotypes were established in four regions of European part of Russia (Figure1). Native aspen stands located closely to these plots were used for studies of clonal structure, evaluation of frequencies of multilocus genotypes, and calculations of probabilities of appearance of identical allelic combinations in a single genotype.Figure 1
Map of location of plantations made of elite clones and corresponding native aspen stands used as reference populations. (1) Prisady, (2) Voronezh, and (3) Yoshkar-Ola.Prisady. Experimental plot located 1 km westward of settlement Prisady in Serpukhovsky Raion (district) of Moscow oblast’ (Russia). Leaves of 52 young or medium-aged (approximately 10–25 y.o.) aspen trees from a natural multiaged stand located in close proximity (1 km) to this plot have been used as a reference population.Voronezh. Seventeen trees were sampled in a stand adjacent to the experimental plot established in Voronezh Oblast. Additional 13 trees were collected along the bank of Voronezh River within the city of Voronezh close to the plantation.Yoshkar-Ola. Young native stand of aspen was the source of trees used as a reference population for an experimental plot located near the city of Yoshkar-Ola, Republic of Mari-El. Leaves from 32 trees were collected.In order to minimize the occasional sampling of individuals having vegetative origin (through sprouting) we collected leaves from trees at a distance not less than 15–20 m from each other. This approach was employed for inclusion into reference samples of predominantly open-pollinated seedlings having maximal genetic diversity. However, based exclusively on external look of the trees and distance among them, sampling of the ramets appearing as a result of sprouting could not be avoided, and subsequent genetic analysis confirmed this.Shoots with leaves were cut off by means of mechanical cutter with an aluminium telescopic mast. Collected shoots with leaves were placed into plastic bags for no more than 6 days at +4°С until processing. Sample preparation included DNA extraction and placement of reserve leaf tissue fragments into labeled zip-bags with silica gel for long-term storage. Outside the period of active vegetation, dormant vegetative buds can be successfully used for DNA extraction.


### 2.2. DNA Extraction

Fragments of leaves approximately 350–500 mg taken from explants growingin vitro on a special media (REF) in Petri dishes were used for DNA extraction.For trees from native populations, we extracted DNA from 350–500 mg fragments of fresh or 200–300 mg of silica-dried leaf tissues by a modified cethyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [13, 14].


### 2.3. Microsatellite Analysis

Microsatellites, or SSR, represent a class of tandemly repeated DNA sequences with short (1–6 pairs of nucleotides, bp) motifs differing in copy numbers among individuals due to high mutation rate. Multiple alleles usually found in codominant microsatellite loci create a great variety of unique genotypic combinations which ensures their reliable identification, especially when a sufficient number of loci are employed. Technically, the analysis of SSR polymorphism requires only Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and subsequent electrophoresis (gel or capillary) for fragment analysis. For the development of the testing system we chose the variant of the method that utilizes only basic equipment and simple reagents. This ensured increased reproducibility of the procedures in any PCR laboratory and allowed achieving high cost-effectiveness of the analysis which is crucial for large-scale practical clone identification.Since the substantial number of nuclear SSR loci for poplars was found in the literature and primer databases we decided to select from several publications and test primers that can be used for routine genotype identification based on very simple equipment without using of DNA-analyzers. An initial set of SSR primers for their potential use as elements of the testing system of molecular identification in aspen was a result of search in bibliographical databases (Thomson Reuters Web of Science,http://webofknowledge.com/) and in Molecular Ecology Resources Primer Database (http://tomato.bio.trinity.edu/).DNA amplification was performed using PCRCore kits (Isogen Laboratories, Ltd., Moscow, Russia) in BioRad Inc. (USA) Dyad Thermo cycler. Microsatellite loci (listed in Table2) from series ORPM [15] and WPMS [16] were amplified with specific primers at concentration of 1 mmol/mL and 5–10 ng of target DNA using the following temperature profile: (1) initial denaturation at 94°С for 3 min; (2) 30 cycles consisting of 30 sec of denaturation at 94°С, primer annealing at variable temperature and time (see Table 3 for final annealing temperature recommended after procedure adjustment), and elongation at 72°С for 1.5 min followed by (3) final elongation at 72°С for 10 min and (4) chilling the PCR mixture to 4°С.Table 2
Microsatellite loci tested for PCR amplification in aspen.
Loci
Primer sequences (5′- 3′)
Repeat motif
Fragment size (bp)3
ORPM141
F- GGGCTGCAGCAGATATTGAR- CCAAAGGAACCCAAAGAAGA
(GCTC)4
146–162
ORPM181
F- AGCAGAGATCGATGCTGAGGR- AATTTCTCGCTTCTCGCATT
(TTTA)4
205
ORPM361
F- AGCCTCCAAACACCATGAACR- ACAGTGGTGTGGATCCTGCT
(GAAA)4
213
ORPM601
F- ATAGCGCCAGAAGCAAAAACR- AAGCAGAAAGTCGTAGGTTCG
(AAT)5
212
ORPM791
F- GAAGCTGAAAACAACAACAAACAR- GGGTTTTTAACATAATAAAAGCTTGG
(AAT)4
160
ORPM811
F- GCTGCAGCCAAACAAAGCR- CAGAAATCCCACCCAAACC
(TATT)4
142–158
ORPM841
F- CTGCAGCCTTACCACCATTTR- CGTGTTCGAGATTGGGATTT
(AAG)4
171
ORPM861
F- CCACATCCATAGCTCTGCAACR- GTACTACCTCGCCTGCCAAC
(CTT)5
204
ORPM1071
F- AATCTGGTGGCTTGCCTCTR- TTGAGGAACACGTGCAGACT
(TAAA)4
190
ORPM1171
F- CCCCCTAATTACCTTGGAAACR- TTGTTTGTATCTCCTCCGTTGA
(ATTA)4
210
ORPM1581
F- GCTGAAACATCCTTCATGGTCR- CGAAGCTGCATAAGCATCAA
(TTTC)4
200
ORPM1931
F- CCGCTGGATTTGTTTGTTTTR- TGAGCAGAAAGATGCGAAGA
(ATTTT)4
187–207
ORPM2021
F- TCGCAAAAGATTCTCCCAGTR- TTCAAATCCCGGTAATGCTC
(TAA)5
184–190
ORPM2061
F- CCGTGGCCATTGACTCTTTAR- GAACCCATTTGGTGCAAGAT
(GCT)7
190–208
ORPM2201
F- AGCTAGCCTGTCGTCAAGGAR- CAAGGAAGCATTCTCGCAAT
(TTTA)6
178–222
ORPM2961
F- CGAAGCCATTGACCCAGTATR- GGGCATCTCTCTCCTTTCAA
(GTTCTG)4
199
ORPM3121
F- GTGGGGATCAATCCAAAAGAR- CCCATATCAAACCATTTGAAAAA
(CCT)6
194
ORPM3661
F- CCTTGAGGGGACACTTCGATR- AAAGAGTTGAGCCCTTGGTG
(TTA)5
156
ORPM3711
F- CCGGACTCTCACAAATCTCCR- TGCTTTTGCTCCTGGTTCTT
(TCTT)6
192–200
ORPM3721
F- AGCTCTTCTGCTGGTGCTGTR- GAGGGAGGGAGGGTAAAAGA
(TCTT)5
190
ORPM4151
F- CTCGGTGCAAATATCGGTTCR- AGATCGATGGTCCTTTCCTG
(GGCG)4
225
ORPM4841
F- CAAAATGGCAATCCAAGGTTR- CCAAGCTTCCAATTGAGTCC
(TTAA)4
190–206
ORPM4881
F- CTCCAGCCGCTTCTATCCTTR- TGTCGTGGGAAAGAACCAGT
(TTA)6
200
ORPM4961
F- CAGCAGTGCAAGCTCCTAAAR- GGCCACTGACAGAGACCAAG
(GGA)4
185
WPMS142
F- CAGCCGCAGCCACTGAGAAATCR- GCCTGCTGAGAAGACTGCCTTGAC
(CGT)28
215–287
WPMS152
F- CAACAAACCATCAATGAAGAAGACR- AGAGGGTGTTGGGGGTGACTA
(CCT)14
201–219
WPMS162
F- CTCGTACTATTTCCGATGATGACCR- AGATTATTAGGTGGGCCAAGGACT
(GTC)8
139–184
WPMS172
F- ACATCCGCCAATGCTTCGGTGTTTR- GTGACGGTGGTGGCGGATTTTCTT
(CAC)15
122–146
WPMS182
F- CTTCACATAGGACATAGCAGCATCR- CACCAGAGTCATCACCAGTTATTG
(GTG)13
219–248
WPMS192
F- AGCCACAGCAAATTCAGATGATGCR- CCTGCTGAGAAGACTGCCTTGACA
(CAG)28
180–234
WPMS202
F- GTGCGCACATCTATGACTATCGR- ATCTTGTAATTCTCCGGGCATCT
(TTCTGG)8
210–222
WPMS212
F- TGCTGATGCAAAAGATTTAGR- TTGGAACTTCAACATTCAGAT
(GCT)45
287–326
WPMS222
F- ACATGCTACGTGTTTGGAATGR- ATCGTATGGATGTAATTGTCTTA
(TGA)23
100–135
Comments:1Tuskan et al., 2004 [15];2Smulders et al., 2001 [16]; 3by literature data in different Populus species (P. tremula, P. xcanescens, and P. alba).Table 3
Results of testing of microsatellite loci in aspen.
Locus
PCR amplification
Fragment size range (bp)
Number of alleles
Status1
Included in testing system
ORPM14
Yes
146–162
4
P
No
ORPM18
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM36
Yes
217
1
M
No
ORPM60
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM79
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM81
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM84
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM86
Yes
204–216
4
P
No
ORPM107
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM117
Yes
218
1
M
No
ORPM158
Yes
200
1
M
No
ORPM193
Yes
182–207
6
P
Yes
ORPM202
Yes
184–193
5
P
Yes
ORPM206
Yes
190–196
3
P
Yes
ORPM220
Yes
178–198
5
P
Yes
ORPM296
Yes
201–183
4
P
Yes
ORPM312
Yes
189–201
4
P
No
ORPM366
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM371
Yes
192–200
3
P
No
ORPM372
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM415
Yes
~280
1
M
No
ORPM484
Yes
190–206
3
P
No
ORPM488
Yes
197–203
2
P
No
ORPM496
No
—
—
N
No
WPMS14
Yes
224–243
3
P
Yes
WPMS15
Yes
189–207
5
P
Yes
WPMS16
Yes
139–184
9
P
Yes
WPMS17
Yes
122–146
7
P
Yes
WPMS18
Yes
219–248
7
P
Yes
WPMS19
Yes
210–252
9
P
Yes
WPMS20
Yes
210–222
4
P
Yes
WPMS21
Yes
196–240
5
P
Yes
WPMS22
Yes
115–135
3
P
Yes
1P: polymorphic, M: monomorphic, and N: no PCR amplification.PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in 6% polyacrylamide gel blocks using Tris-EDTA-borate buffer system. After electrophoresis gels were stained in ethidium bromide solution and visualized in UV-light, graphic images were captured and saved using Doc-Print II Vilber Lourmat gel documentation system and processed in graphical editors. Fragment size was estimated by means of specialized software (Photo-Capt). DNA ofE. coli plasmid pBR322, restricted by endonucleaseHpaII was used as a molecular weight marker.


### 2.4. Statistical Analysis

Clone identity was determined using multilocus matches analysis for codominant data. Genotype probability (GP), meaning probability of appearance of particular multilocus combination in population, and probability of identity, estimating probability of random matching of two unrelated (PI) or related (PIsib) individuals by particular set of loci, were calculated based on distribution of allele frequencies in population samples.Correspondence of observed genotype distributions for each SSR locus to the expected according Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested by chi-square criterion. Allele number and observed and expected heterozygosities were calculated for each native sample. We employed Wright’sF-statistics for assessment of genetic subdivision among the studied population samples. All the above-mentioned calculations were performed in the add-in for MS Excel, GenAlEx 6.5 [17, 18].


## 2.1. Plant Material

Elite aspen and hybrid clones used for development of testing systems for molecular identification have been obtained from micropropagated cell cultures [10] maintained in the Pushchino branch of Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences (Pushchino, Russia). Origin and short description of eight clones are presented in Table 1.Table 1
Elite aspen and hybrid clones and their characteristics.
Original genotype
Putative species/hybrid identity
Origin
Description
Clones and clonal lineages obtained based on original genotypes
PtV22
PutativelyPopulus tremula
Minsk Oblast, Belarus, breeding form obtained in Institute of Forest, National Academy of Belarus, Gomel, Belarus, provided by V. E. Padutov
Diploid green-bark aspen form. Characterized by fast growth and resistance to heart rot caused by pathogen fungusPhellinus tremula
Ptv22-1, Ptv22-2, Ptv22-3, 21mut, 2mut, 14mut, 4mut, 12mut
Pt
P. tremula
Leningrad Oblast, Russia, breeding form obtained in St. Petersburg Research Institute for Forestry, provided by  D. A. Shabunin
Diploid giant aspen form. Characterized by fast growth and resistance to heart rot caused by pathogen fungusPhellinus tremula
Pt2, Pt3
F2
P. tremula
Kostroma Oblast, Russia, breeding form obtained by S. N. Bagayev, provided by D. A. Shabunin
Diploid female clone. Highly productive (plus 51% by sum of stem cross section squares and plus 43% by growing stock). Increased wood density of 475 kg/m3[11]
F2-1, F2-2, F2-3
47
P. tremula
Latvian State Forest Research Institute “Silava,” Latvia, provided by Dr. Arnis Gailis
Diploid aspen form. Productivity of 180–200 m3/haat age 12 under density of 1100 stems/ha. Characterized by resistance to heart rot caused by pathogen fungus Phellinus tremula[12]
47-1, 47-1-1-31, 47-1-1-22, 47-1-2-27, 47-1-1-19, 47-1-2-53
С-control
P. tremuloides × P. tremula
-“-
Diploid hybrid form. Productivity of 180–200 m3/ha at age 12 under density of 1100 stems/ha [12]
С-1, С-2, С-3
23
P. tremuloides × P. tremula
-“-
Diploid hybrid form. Maximal productivity of 200–250 m3/ha demonstrated at age 12 under density of 1100 stems/ha [12]. High wood density
L23-1, L23-2, L23-3
4
P. tremuloides × P. tremula
-“-
Maximal productivity of 250–300 m3/ha demonstrated at age 12 under density of 2500 stems/ha [12]
L4-1, L4-2, L4-3
No. 3-understory
P. tremula
Republic of Tatarstan, breeding form by A. H. Gaziulllin, provided by N. R. Garipov
Triploid aspen form. Characterized by fast growth and resistance to heart rot caused by pathogen fungusPhellinus tremula
No. 3-understory-1Experimental aspen clonal plantations derived from these elite genotypes were established in four regions of European part of Russia (Figure1). Native aspen stands located closely to these plots were used for studies of clonal structure, evaluation of frequencies of multilocus genotypes, and calculations of probabilities of appearance of identical allelic combinations in a single genotype.Figure 1
Map of location of plantations made of elite clones and corresponding native aspen stands used as reference populations. (1) Prisady, (2) Voronezh, and (3) Yoshkar-Ola.Prisady. Experimental plot located 1 km westward of settlement Prisady in Serpukhovsky Raion (district) of Moscow oblast’ (Russia). Leaves of 52 young or medium-aged (approximately 10–25 y.o.) aspen trees from a natural multiaged stand located in close proximity (1 km) to this plot have been used as a reference population.Voronezh. Seventeen trees were sampled in a stand adjacent to the experimental plot established in Voronezh Oblast. Additional 13 trees were collected along the bank of Voronezh River within the city of Voronezh close to the plantation.Yoshkar-Ola. Young native stand of aspen was the source of trees used as a reference population for an experimental plot located near the city of Yoshkar-Ola, Republic of Mari-El. Leaves from 32 trees were collected.In order to minimize the occasional sampling of individuals having vegetative origin (through sprouting) we collected leaves from trees at a distance not less than 15–20 m from each other. This approach was employed for inclusion into reference samples of predominantly open-pollinated seedlings having maximal genetic diversity. However, based exclusively on external look of the trees and distance among them, sampling of the ramets appearing as a result of sprouting could not be avoided, and subsequent genetic analysis confirmed this.Shoots with leaves were cut off by means of mechanical cutter with an aluminium telescopic mast. Collected shoots with leaves were placed into plastic bags for no more than 6 days at +4°С until processing. Sample preparation included DNA extraction and placement of reserve leaf tissue fragments into labeled zip-bags with silica gel for long-term storage. Outside the period of active vegetation, dormant vegetative buds can be successfully used for DNA extraction.


## 2.2. DNA Extraction

Fragments of leaves approximately 350–500 mg taken from explants growingin vitro on a special media (REF) in Petri dishes were used for DNA extraction.For trees from native populations, we extracted DNA from 350–500 mg fragments of fresh or 200–300 mg of silica-dried leaf tissues by a modified cethyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [13, 14].


## 2.3. Microsatellite Analysis

Microsatellites, or SSR, represent a class of tandemly repeated DNA sequences with short (1–6 pairs of nucleotides, bp) motifs differing in copy numbers among individuals due to high mutation rate. Multiple alleles usually found in codominant microsatellite loci create a great variety of unique genotypic combinations which ensures their reliable identification, especially when a sufficient number of loci are employed. Technically, the analysis of SSR polymorphism requires only Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and subsequent electrophoresis (gel or capillary) for fragment analysis. For the development of the testing system we chose the variant of the method that utilizes only basic equipment and simple reagents. This ensured increased reproducibility of the procedures in any PCR laboratory and allowed achieving high cost-effectiveness of the analysis which is crucial for large-scale practical clone identification.Since the substantial number of nuclear SSR loci for poplars was found in the literature and primer databases we decided to select from several publications and test primers that can be used for routine genotype identification based on very simple equipment without using of DNA-analyzers. An initial set of SSR primers for their potential use as elements of the testing system of molecular identification in aspen was a result of search in bibliographical databases (Thomson Reuters Web of Science,http://webofknowledge.com/) and in Molecular Ecology Resources Primer Database (http://tomato.bio.trinity.edu/).DNA amplification was performed using PCRCore kits (Isogen Laboratories, Ltd., Moscow, Russia) in BioRad Inc. (USA) Dyad Thermo cycler. Microsatellite loci (listed in Table2) from series ORPM [15] and WPMS [16] were amplified with specific primers at concentration of 1 mmol/mL and 5–10 ng of target DNA using the following temperature profile: (1) initial denaturation at 94°С for 3 min; (2) 30 cycles consisting of 30 sec of denaturation at 94°С, primer annealing at variable temperature and time (see Table 3 for final annealing temperature recommended after procedure adjustment), and elongation at 72°С for 1.5 min followed by (3) final elongation at 72°С for 10 min and (4) chilling the PCR mixture to 4°С.Table 2
Microsatellite loci tested for PCR amplification in aspen.
Loci
Primer sequences (5′- 3′)
Repeat motif
Fragment size (bp)3
ORPM141
F- GGGCTGCAGCAGATATTGAR- CCAAAGGAACCCAAAGAAGA
(GCTC)4
146–162
ORPM181
F- AGCAGAGATCGATGCTGAGGR- AATTTCTCGCTTCTCGCATT
(TTTA)4
205
ORPM361
F- AGCCTCCAAACACCATGAACR- ACAGTGGTGTGGATCCTGCT
(GAAA)4
213
ORPM601
F- ATAGCGCCAGAAGCAAAAACR- AAGCAGAAAGTCGTAGGTTCG
(AAT)5
212
ORPM791
F- GAAGCTGAAAACAACAACAAACAR- GGGTTTTTAACATAATAAAAGCTTGG
(AAT)4
160
ORPM811
F- GCTGCAGCCAAACAAAGCR- CAGAAATCCCACCCAAACC
(TATT)4
142–158
ORPM841
F- CTGCAGCCTTACCACCATTTR- CGTGTTCGAGATTGGGATTT
(AAG)4
171
ORPM861
F- CCACATCCATAGCTCTGCAACR- GTACTACCTCGCCTGCCAAC
(CTT)5
204
ORPM1071
F- AATCTGGTGGCTTGCCTCTR- TTGAGGAACACGTGCAGACT
(TAAA)4
190
ORPM1171
F- CCCCCTAATTACCTTGGAAACR- TTGTTTGTATCTCCTCCGTTGA
(ATTA)4
210
ORPM1581
F- GCTGAAACATCCTTCATGGTCR- CGAAGCTGCATAAGCATCAA
(TTTC)4
200
ORPM1931
F- CCGCTGGATTTGTTTGTTTTR- TGAGCAGAAAGATGCGAAGA
(ATTTT)4
187–207
ORPM2021
F- TCGCAAAAGATTCTCCCAGTR- TTCAAATCCCGGTAATGCTC
(TAA)5
184–190
ORPM2061
F- CCGTGGCCATTGACTCTTTAR- GAACCCATTTGGTGCAAGAT
(GCT)7
190–208
ORPM2201
F- AGCTAGCCTGTCGTCAAGGAR- CAAGGAAGCATTCTCGCAAT
(TTTA)6
178–222
ORPM2961
F- CGAAGCCATTGACCCAGTATR- GGGCATCTCTCTCCTTTCAA
(GTTCTG)4
199
ORPM3121
F- GTGGGGATCAATCCAAAAGAR- CCCATATCAAACCATTTGAAAAA
(CCT)6
194
ORPM3661
F- CCTTGAGGGGACACTTCGATR- AAAGAGTTGAGCCCTTGGTG
(TTA)5
156
ORPM3711
F- CCGGACTCTCACAAATCTCCR- TGCTTTTGCTCCTGGTTCTT
(TCTT)6
192–200
ORPM3721
F- AGCTCTTCTGCTGGTGCTGTR- GAGGGAGGGAGGGTAAAAGA
(TCTT)5
190
ORPM4151
F- CTCGGTGCAAATATCGGTTCR- AGATCGATGGTCCTTTCCTG
(GGCG)4
225
ORPM4841
F- CAAAATGGCAATCCAAGGTTR- CCAAGCTTCCAATTGAGTCC
(TTAA)4
190–206
ORPM4881
F- CTCCAGCCGCTTCTATCCTTR- TGTCGTGGGAAAGAACCAGT
(TTA)6
200
ORPM4961
F- CAGCAGTGCAAGCTCCTAAAR- GGCCACTGACAGAGACCAAG
(GGA)4
185
WPMS142
F- CAGCCGCAGCCACTGAGAAATCR- GCCTGCTGAGAAGACTGCCTTGAC
(CGT)28
215–287
WPMS152
F- CAACAAACCATCAATGAAGAAGACR- AGAGGGTGTTGGGGGTGACTA
(CCT)14
201–219
WPMS162
F- CTCGTACTATTTCCGATGATGACCR- AGATTATTAGGTGGGCCAAGGACT
(GTC)8
139–184
WPMS172
F- ACATCCGCCAATGCTTCGGTGTTTR- GTGACGGTGGTGGCGGATTTTCTT
(CAC)15
122–146
WPMS182
F- CTTCACATAGGACATAGCAGCATCR- CACCAGAGTCATCACCAGTTATTG
(GTG)13
219–248
WPMS192
F- AGCCACAGCAAATTCAGATGATGCR- CCTGCTGAGAAGACTGCCTTGACA
(CAG)28
180–234
WPMS202
F- GTGCGCACATCTATGACTATCGR- ATCTTGTAATTCTCCGGGCATCT
(TTCTGG)8
210–222
WPMS212
F- TGCTGATGCAAAAGATTTAGR- TTGGAACTTCAACATTCAGAT
(GCT)45
287–326
WPMS222
F- ACATGCTACGTGTTTGGAATGR- ATCGTATGGATGTAATTGTCTTA
(TGA)23
100–135
Comments:1Tuskan et al., 2004 [15];2Smulders et al., 2001 [16]; 3by literature data in different Populus species (P. tremula, P. xcanescens, and P. alba).Table 3
Results of testing of microsatellite loci in aspen.
Locus
PCR amplification
Fragment size range (bp)
Number of alleles
Status1
Included in testing system
ORPM14
Yes
146–162
4
P
No
ORPM18
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM36
Yes
217
1
M
No
ORPM60
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM79
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM81
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM84
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM86
Yes
204–216
4
P
No
ORPM107
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM117
Yes
218
1
M
No
ORPM158
Yes
200
1
M
No
ORPM193
Yes
182–207
6
P
Yes
ORPM202
Yes
184–193
5
P
Yes
ORPM206
Yes
190–196
3
P
Yes
ORPM220
Yes
178–198
5
P
Yes
ORPM296
Yes
201–183
4
P
Yes
ORPM312
Yes
189–201
4
P
No
ORPM366
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM371
Yes
192–200
3
P
No
ORPM372
No
—
—
N
No
ORPM415
Yes
~280
1
M
No
ORPM484
Yes
190–206
3
P
No
ORPM488
Yes
197–203
2
P
No
ORPM496
No
—
—
N
No
WPMS14
Yes
224–243
3
P
Yes
WPMS15
Yes
189–207
5
P
Yes
WPMS16
Yes
139–184
9
P
Yes
WPMS17
Yes
122–146
7
P
Yes
WPMS18
Yes
219–248
7
P
Yes
WPMS19
Yes
210–252
9
P
Yes
WPMS20
Yes
210–222
4
P
Yes
WPMS21
Yes
196–240
5
P
Yes
WPMS22
Yes
115–135
3
P
Yes
1P: polymorphic, M: monomorphic, and N: no PCR amplification.PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in 6% polyacrylamide gel blocks using Tris-EDTA-borate buffer system. After electrophoresis gels were stained in ethidium bromide solution and visualized in UV-light, graphic images were captured and saved using Doc-Print II Vilber Lourmat gel documentation system and processed in graphical editors. Fragment size was estimated by means of specialized software (Photo-Capt). DNA ofE. coli plasmid pBR322, restricted by endonucleaseHpaII was used as a molecular weight marker.


## 2.4. Statistical Analysis

Clone identity was determined using multilocus matches analysis for codominant data. Genotype probability (GP), meaning probability of appearance of particular multilocus combination in population, and probability of identity, estimating probability of random matching of two unrelated (PI) or related (PIsib) individuals by particular set of loci, were calculated based on distribution of allele frequencies in population samples.Correspondence of observed genotype distributions for each SSR locus to the expected according Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested by chi-square criterion. Allele number and observed and expected heterozygosities were calculated for each native sample. We employed Wright’sF-statistics for assessment of genetic subdivision among the studied population samples. All the above-mentioned calculations were performed in the add-in for MS Excel, GenAlEx 6.5 [17, 18].


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Development of SSR-Based Testing Systems for Genotype Identification in Aspen

For initial testing, we selected 33 heterological tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide microsatellite loci from two sets; series ORPM was designed first forPopulus trichocarpa [15] and series WPMS was designed forPopulus nigra [16]. Characteristics of these loci are given in Table 2. Initial testing was done on DNA samples from three clones (47-1, PtV22 и  С-control) from anin vitro collection stored and propagated in the Pushchino branch of Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences (Pushchino, Moscow Oblast, Russia). At this stage, their variability was also tested on 20–24 specimens of wild aspen from Novosibirsk Oblast (Western Siberia, Russia) and Krasnoyarsk Krai (Middle Siberia, Russia).As a result of the first phase of testing, 24 loci were successfully amplified and nine other loci failed to produce PCR products. Out of 24 loci that produced PCR fragments, 20 loci were shown to be variable with a number of alleles from two to nine, while four loci that have been successfully amplified were monomorphic (Table3). After additional testing at variable PCR regimes we finally selected 14 loci with reliable amplification and substantial polymorphism level for inclusion into the test system for molecular genetic identification. Examples of the variability of the selected microsatellite loci in aspen are shown on Figures 2(a) and 2(b).Figure 2
(a) Electrophoretic patterns of PCR-amplified SSR lociORPM202,ORPM206,ORPM220,ORPM296, andORPM312 in aspen. Loci: lanes 1–4:ORPM202; lanes 6–9:ORPM206; lanes 10–13:ORPM220; samples: 1, 6, 10, 15, and 19, aspen from native population; 2, 7, 11, 16, and 20, clone С-control; 3, 8, 12, 18, and 21, clone 47-1; 4, 9, 13, 18, and 22, clone PtV22. Lanes 5, 14, and 23: DNA molecular weight marker (DNA ofE. coli plasmid pBR322, digested by restriction endonucleaseHpaII). (b) Electrophoretic patterns of PCR-amplified SSR lociWPMS15,WPMS17,WPMS18,WPMS19,WPMS21, andWPMS22 in aspen. Loci: lanes 1–4:WPMS15, lanes 6–9:WPMS17, lanes 10–13:WPMS18, lanes 15–18:WPMS19, lanes 19–22:WPMS21, and lanes 24–27:WPMS22. Samples: 1, 6, 10, 15, 19, and 24, aspen from natural population; 2, 7, 11, 16, 20, and 25, clone С-control; 3, 8, 12, 16, 21, and 26, clone 47-1; 4, 9, 13, 18, 22, and 27, clone PtV22. Lanes 5, 14, and 23, DNA molecular weight marker (DNA ofE. coli plasmid pBR322, digested by restriction endonucleaseHpaII).
(a)
(b)The obtained multilocus genotypes of eight elite clones and reference genotypes of wild trees from native stands are listed in Table S1 in Supplementary Material available online athttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/261518. We analyzed up to 8 ramets sampled at different phases of the microclonal propagation. Within clones, genotypes were stable and unambiguously reproduced among ramets independently of the stage of propagation. After exclusion of ramets of the same genet, both elite clones and aspen genotypes from native populations included in the reference samples were 100% different. Probability of appearance of genotypes (GP: genotype probability) among elite clones varied from 2.4 · 10−21 to 1.7 · 10−11, among trees in a reference samples from 4.0 · 10−24 to 5.8 · 10−9. Probability of the occasional coincidence of two unrelated genotypes (PI: probability of identity) varied from 4.8 · 10−10 in Yoshkar-Ola to 4.3 · 10−13 in Prisady. Adjusted to the theoretical probability of descendance of the compared individuals from the same ancestors more conservative estimate (PIsibs) was within the range of 1.0 · 10−4 in Yoshkar-Ola to 9.3 · 10−6 in Voronezh. All values are quite low, so that the theoretical frequency of appearance of repeatable genotypes due to recombination of different gametes in course of seed reproduction was not exceeding about 1 accidentally found identical allele combination out of 10000 comparisons. The relationship of PI and PIsibs from the number of loci used is shown at Figure 3 and demonstrates practically negligible probability of appearance of identical genotypes while using first 7 to 8 loci selected for the inclusion into test system. Using all 14 loci ensures additional reliability and robustness of the procedure.Figure 3
Relationship of PI and PIsibs from the number of used loci. 1 represents locus 1, 2 represents loci 1 + 2, and so forth.Development of microsatellite loci for species of the genusPopulus started in late 20th century along with technologies of molecular genetic markers. In 1998, one of the first sets of primers for amplification of dinucleotide SSR loci was designed for American trembling poplar,Populus tremuloides [19]. In this paper a successful cross-amplification of the same markers for several other poplar species,P.deltoides,P.nigra,P. xcanadensis, andP. maximowiczii, was demonstrated. The authors also postulated the broad spectrum of applications of SSR loci for different purposes including clone identification, analysis of the controlled matings, genome mapping, marker-assisted selection, genetic diversity assays, and support of the programs for conservation and sustainable management of forest genetic resources. Subsequent studies provided eight other dinucleotide SSR loci forPopulus tremuloides [20]. Since that time, microsatellite loci were developed for other species includingP. nigra [16, 21]. Some of these loci were also amplified inP. deltoides,P. trichocarpa,P. tremula,P. tremuloides,P. candicans, andP. lasiocarpa. Specific SSR loci primers were designed forPopulus euphratica [22–25]. Later on, this set was used for development of multiplex panels used for genetic diversity estimation in this species [26, 27].Next generation sequencing was the most efficient way of detection of tandem repeats in poplar genome and design on their base transferrable SSR primers as it was demonstrated in case of balsamic poplar,Populus trichocarpa [15, 28]. Such universal cross-amplified loci are used for species and hybrid identification and for estimation of genetic differentiation among congeneric species [5, 9, 29–31].Microsatellites are also useful for checking of somaclonal diversity within a pool of ramets obtained by microclonal propagation from a single donor tree [5], for identification of individual clones in an aspect of their tolerance to environmental factors [32]. We did not observe any variation in SSR patterns among ramets of the same elite clonal lineage. Nuclear microsatellites along with other classes of molecular markers are employed also for determination of ploidy level in poplars [33, 34], and indications of triploidy were found by us with respect to several genotypes. Triploid aspen hybrids often demonstrate increased vigor and resistance to pathogens, so this matter should be further studied by means of karyological and floating cytometry analysis.


### 3.2. Analysis of Clonal Structure in Native Aspen Stands

Since the very moment of the field sampling of material in wild stands we tried to avoid inclusion of clonal ramets arised as sprouts which is common for aspen. In all studied stands the same sampling scheme was applied keeping at least 15–20 m between the trees. Nevertheless, ramets of the same clone indicating common occurrence of vegetative propagations were found in all of the studied natural populations (Table S1).Prisady. Among the studied 52 trees, we found 41 different haplotypes; one multilocus genotype was found nine times and one was found three times. We concluded that these repeated multilocus combinations resulted from sampling sprouts being ramets of the same clone.Voronezh. Among 17 trees collected at close proximity to the site of the experimental plantation no clonal individuals were found. Thirteen trees collected at the Voronezh River bank were represented by eight genotypes: four of them were in one replicate, three were found to be two ramets of the same clone, and one genotype was found in three copies evidently originated from sprouting of ever existing progenitors. In total, we identified 25 different haplotypes in this reference population sample.Yoshkar-Ola. Thirty-two analyzed trees combined into 13 different haplotypes identified by multilocus matches analysis; one genotype appeared twice, one genotype appeared five times, one genotype appeared seven times, and one genotype appeared nine times. Repeated genotypes evidently corresponded to ramets resulting from sprouting.We concluded that sprouting and high level of clonality are a widespread phenomenon in native aspen stands. In aspen, as well as in many other poplars, vegetative clones are able to occupy large areas. Therefore, for the collection of a sample free of repeated clonal genotypes distances between trees should be increased up to at least 40–50 m. However, more precise estimation of maximal spread of a single clone over stand territory also requires special exploration.Among other applications, nuclear SSR loci were useful for the studies of clonal structure and genetic relationships among clone genotypes in native stands [35–38] or between native and artificial stands [39, 40]. Variation in level of clonality was observed, for instance, in black poplar,P. nigra [41]. Extensive clonal assemblies were found by means of SSR analysis also in European black poplar [42], in the taxonomic continuumP. alba–P. xcanescens on the Iberian Peninsula [43], and in other poplar species.


### 3.3. Levels of Intra- and Interpopulation Genetic Variability

All the loci of the selected set were polymorphic in all studied native population samples. Values of average allele number, effective allele number, and observed and expected heterozygosity were slightly higher inPrisady andVoronezh than inYoshkar-Ola (Table 4).Table 4
Parameters of genetic variability in aspen populations.
Population
N
N
a
N
e
H
O
H
E
U
H
E
F
Prisady
Mean
41
6.429
3.921
0.631
0.661
0.669
0.047
s.e.
0.850
0.602
0.059
0.044
0.045
0.065
Voronezh
Mean
25
7.429
3.970
0.580
0.687
0.701
0.188
s.e.
1.274
0.584
0.068
0.035
0.036
0.076
Yoshkar-Ola
Mean
13
4.643
2.738
0.522
0.567
0.590
0.109
s.e.
0.541
0.343
0.072
0.043
0.045
0.087
Total mean
Mean
26.333
6.167
3.543
0.578
0.639
0.654
0.115
s.e.
1.791
0.558
0.308
0.038
0.024
0.025
0.044
s.e.: standard error.
N: sample size.
N
a: mean number of alleles.
N
e: effective number of alleles.
H
O: observed heterozygosity.
H
E: expected heterozygosity.
U
H
E: unbiased expected heterozygosity.
F: fixation index (intrapopulation coefficient of inbreeding).The averaged over lociFST (proportion of inter-population variation in total variation, Table 5) was 0.058 ± 0.014 with the highest values observed in two loci: ORPM202 (0.164) and WPMS14 (0.162). AMOVA test showed that 6% of total molecular variation was among populations (significant, P=0.001), 10% were among individuals, and 84% were within individuals.Table 5
F-statistics for three natural aspen populations.
Locus
F
I
S
F
I
T
F
S
T
ORPM193
0.158
0.230
0.086
ORPM202
0.514
0.593
0.164
ORPM206
0.276
0.363
0.120
ORPM220
0.066
0.096
0.032
ORPM296
0.046
0.067
0.023
WPMS14
0.074
0.224
0.162
WPMS15
−0.187
−0.144
0.036
WPMS16
−0.105
−0.083
0.019
WPMS17
−0.066
−0.028
0.036
WPMS18
0.305
0.322
0.025
WPMS19
−0.034
−0.003
0.029
WPMS20
0.111
0.131
0.023
WPMS21
−0.057
−0.027
0.028
WPMS22
0.563
0.578
0.035
Mean
0.119
0.166
0.058
s.e.
0.060
0.062
0.014
s.e.: standard error.Microsatellites isolated from nuclear as well as chloroplast genomes were employed for the analysis of genetic diversity and genetic structure in various poplar species [42, 44–60]. Levels of intrapopulation genetic diversity observed by us in native aspen stands were within the range of values commonly observed in poplars and estimated by SSR loci analysis ([47] and references therein).A substantial number of studies employing microsatellite technique were focused on the detection of hybridization in natural [31, 46, 61–63] or artificial [64] stands of poplars. SSR loci help to reveal mechanisms of interspecific crossing and reproductive isolation [65–67]. In this study we concentrated on among-individual and among-population variation rather than on interspecific differences, but with respect to some of the studied elite clones their hybrid origin should be genetically tested using a complex set of markers but of nuclear and cytoplasmic localization. Hi-fidelity identification of interspecific hybrids and industrial clones was reported in a considerable number of publications [5, 6, 51, 68–74]. A remarkable publication reports on the genetic identity of some industrial clones of poplars previously treated as different [68, 69].The practical task of identity monitoring of commercial clones inin vitro collections [75, 76] was similar to that employed in the present research. In all applications where reliable individual identification was required SSRs showed high effectiveness.


## 3.1. Development of SSR-Based Testing Systems for Genotype Identification in Aspen

For initial testing, we selected 33 heterological tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide microsatellite loci from two sets; series ORPM was designed first forPopulus trichocarpa [15] and series WPMS was designed forPopulus nigra [16]. Characteristics of these loci are given in Table 2. Initial testing was done on DNA samples from three clones (47-1, PtV22 и  С-control) from anin vitro collection stored and propagated in the Pushchino branch of Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences (Pushchino, Moscow Oblast, Russia). At this stage, their variability was also tested on 20–24 specimens of wild aspen from Novosibirsk Oblast (Western Siberia, Russia) and Krasnoyarsk Krai (Middle Siberia, Russia).As a result of the first phase of testing, 24 loci were successfully amplified and nine other loci failed to produce PCR products. Out of 24 loci that produced PCR fragments, 20 loci were shown to be variable with a number of alleles from two to nine, while four loci that have been successfully amplified were monomorphic (Table3). After additional testing at variable PCR regimes we finally selected 14 loci with reliable amplification and substantial polymorphism level for inclusion into the test system for molecular genetic identification. Examples of the variability of the selected microsatellite loci in aspen are shown on Figures 2(a) and 2(b).Figure 2
(a) Electrophoretic patterns of PCR-amplified SSR lociORPM202,ORPM206,ORPM220,ORPM296, andORPM312 in aspen. Loci: lanes 1–4:ORPM202; lanes 6–9:ORPM206; lanes 10–13:ORPM220; samples: 1, 6, 10, 15, and 19, aspen from native population; 2, 7, 11, 16, and 20, clone С-control; 3, 8, 12, 18, and 21, clone 47-1; 4, 9, 13, 18, and 22, clone PtV22. Lanes 5, 14, and 23: DNA molecular weight marker (DNA ofE. coli plasmid pBR322, digested by restriction endonucleaseHpaII). (b) Electrophoretic patterns of PCR-amplified SSR lociWPMS15,WPMS17,WPMS18,WPMS19,WPMS21, andWPMS22 in aspen. Loci: lanes 1–4:WPMS15, lanes 6–9:WPMS17, lanes 10–13:WPMS18, lanes 15–18:WPMS19, lanes 19–22:WPMS21, and lanes 24–27:WPMS22. Samples: 1, 6, 10, 15, 19, and 24, aspen from natural population; 2, 7, 11, 16, 20, and 25, clone С-control; 3, 8, 12, 16, 21, and 26, clone 47-1; 4, 9, 13, 18, 22, and 27, clone PtV22. Lanes 5, 14, and 23, DNA molecular weight marker (DNA ofE. coli plasmid pBR322, digested by restriction endonucleaseHpaII).
(a)
(b)The obtained multilocus genotypes of eight elite clones and reference genotypes of wild trees from native stands are listed in Table S1 in Supplementary Material available online athttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/261518. We analyzed up to 8 ramets sampled at different phases of the microclonal propagation. Within clones, genotypes were stable and unambiguously reproduced among ramets independently of the stage of propagation. After exclusion of ramets of the same genet, both elite clones and aspen genotypes from native populations included in the reference samples were 100% different. Probability of appearance of genotypes (GP: genotype probability) among elite clones varied from 2.4 · 10−21 to 1.7 · 10−11, among trees in a reference samples from 4.0 · 10−24 to 5.8 · 10−9. Probability of the occasional coincidence of two unrelated genotypes (PI: probability of identity) varied from 4.8 · 10−10 in Yoshkar-Ola to 4.3 · 10−13 in Prisady. Adjusted to the theoretical probability of descendance of the compared individuals from the same ancestors more conservative estimate (PIsibs) was within the range of 1.0 · 10−4 in Yoshkar-Ola to 9.3 · 10−6 in Voronezh. All values are quite low, so that the theoretical frequency of appearance of repeatable genotypes due to recombination of different gametes in course of seed reproduction was not exceeding about 1 accidentally found identical allele combination out of 10000 comparisons. The relationship of PI and PIsibs from the number of loci used is shown at Figure 3 and demonstrates practically negligible probability of appearance of identical genotypes while using first 7 to 8 loci selected for the inclusion into test system. Using all 14 loci ensures additional reliability and robustness of the procedure.Figure 3
Relationship of PI and PIsibs from the number of used loci. 1 represents locus 1, 2 represents loci 1 + 2, and so forth.Development of microsatellite loci for species of the genusPopulus started in late 20th century along with technologies of molecular genetic markers. In 1998, one of the first sets of primers for amplification of dinucleotide SSR loci was designed for American trembling poplar,Populus tremuloides [19]. In this paper a successful cross-amplification of the same markers for several other poplar species,P.deltoides,P.nigra,P. xcanadensis, andP. maximowiczii, was demonstrated. The authors also postulated the broad spectrum of applications of SSR loci for different purposes including clone identification, analysis of the controlled matings, genome mapping, marker-assisted selection, genetic diversity assays, and support of the programs for conservation and sustainable management of forest genetic resources. Subsequent studies provided eight other dinucleotide SSR loci forPopulus tremuloides [20]. Since that time, microsatellite loci were developed for other species includingP. nigra [16, 21]. Some of these loci were also amplified inP. deltoides,P. trichocarpa,P. tremula,P. tremuloides,P. candicans, andP. lasiocarpa. Specific SSR loci primers were designed forPopulus euphratica [22–25]. Later on, this set was used for development of multiplex panels used for genetic diversity estimation in this species [26, 27].Next generation sequencing was the most efficient way of detection of tandem repeats in poplar genome and design on their base transferrable SSR primers as it was demonstrated in case of balsamic poplar,Populus trichocarpa [15, 28]. Such universal cross-amplified loci are used for species and hybrid identification and for estimation of genetic differentiation among congeneric species [5, 9, 29–31].Microsatellites are also useful for checking of somaclonal diversity within a pool of ramets obtained by microclonal propagation from a single donor tree [5], for identification of individual clones in an aspect of their tolerance to environmental factors [32]. We did not observe any variation in SSR patterns among ramets of the same elite clonal lineage. Nuclear microsatellites along with other classes of molecular markers are employed also for determination of ploidy level in poplars [33, 34], and indications of triploidy were found by us with respect to several genotypes. Triploid aspen hybrids often demonstrate increased vigor and resistance to pathogens, so this matter should be further studied by means of karyological and floating cytometry analysis.


## 3.2. Analysis of Clonal Structure in Native Aspen Stands

Since the very moment of the field sampling of material in wild stands we tried to avoid inclusion of clonal ramets arised as sprouts which is common for aspen. In all studied stands the same sampling scheme was applied keeping at least 15–20 m between the trees. Nevertheless, ramets of the same clone indicating common occurrence of vegetative propagations were found in all of the studied natural populations (Table S1).Prisady. Among the studied 52 trees, we found 41 different haplotypes; one multilocus genotype was found nine times and one was found three times. We concluded that these repeated multilocus combinations resulted from sampling sprouts being ramets of the same clone.Voronezh. Among 17 trees collected at close proximity to the site of the experimental plantation no clonal individuals were found. Thirteen trees collected at the Voronezh River bank were represented by eight genotypes: four of them were in one replicate, three were found to be two ramets of the same clone, and one genotype was found in three copies evidently originated from sprouting of ever existing progenitors. In total, we identified 25 different haplotypes in this reference population sample.Yoshkar-Ola. Thirty-two analyzed trees combined into 13 different haplotypes identified by multilocus matches analysis; one genotype appeared twice, one genotype appeared five times, one genotype appeared seven times, and one genotype appeared nine times. Repeated genotypes evidently corresponded to ramets resulting from sprouting.We concluded that sprouting and high level of clonality are a widespread phenomenon in native aspen stands. In aspen, as well as in many other poplars, vegetative clones are able to occupy large areas. Therefore, for the collection of a sample free of repeated clonal genotypes distances between trees should be increased up to at least 40–50 m. However, more precise estimation of maximal spread of a single clone over stand territory also requires special exploration.Among other applications, nuclear SSR loci were useful for the studies of clonal structure and genetic relationships among clone genotypes in native stands [35–38] or between native and artificial stands [39, 40]. Variation in level of clonality was observed, for instance, in black poplar,P. nigra [41]. Extensive clonal assemblies were found by means of SSR analysis also in European black poplar [42], in the taxonomic continuumP. alba–P. xcanescens on the Iberian Peninsula [43], and in other poplar species.


## 3.3. Levels of Intra- and Interpopulation Genetic Variability

All the loci of the selected set were polymorphic in all studied native population samples. Values of average allele number, effective allele number, and observed and expected heterozygosity were slightly higher inPrisady andVoronezh than inYoshkar-Ola (Table 4).Table 4
Parameters of genetic variability in aspen populations.
Population
N
N
a
N
e
H
O
H
E
U
H
E
F
Prisady
Mean
41
6.429
3.921
0.631
0.661
0.669
0.047
s.e.
0.850
0.602
0.059
0.044
0.045
0.065
Voronezh
Mean
25
7.429
3.970
0.580
0.687
0.701
0.188
s.e.
1.274
0.584
0.068
0.035
0.036
0.076
Yoshkar-Ola
Mean
13
4.643
2.738
0.522
0.567
0.590
0.109
s.e.
0.541
0.343
0.072
0.043
0.045
0.087
Total mean
Mean
26.333
6.167
3.543
0.578
0.639
0.654
0.115
s.e.
1.791
0.558
0.308
0.038
0.024
0.025
0.044
s.e.: standard error.
N: sample size.
N
a: mean number of alleles.
N
e: effective number of alleles.
H
O: observed heterozygosity.
H
E: expected heterozygosity.
U
H
E: unbiased expected heterozygosity.
F: fixation index (intrapopulation coefficient of inbreeding).The averaged over lociFST (proportion of inter-population variation in total variation, Table 5) was 0.058 ± 0.014 with the highest values observed in two loci: ORPM202 (0.164) and WPMS14 (0.162). AMOVA test showed that 6% of total molecular variation was among populations (significant, P=0.001), 10% were among individuals, and 84% were within individuals.Table 5
F-statistics for three natural aspen populations.
Locus
F
I
S
F
I
T
F
S
T
ORPM193
0.158
0.230
0.086
ORPM202
0.514
0.593
0.164
ORPM206
0.276
0.363
0.120
ORPM220
0.066
0.096
0.032
ORPM296
0.046
0.067
0.023
WPMS14
0.074
0.224
0.162
WPMS15
−0.187
−0.144
0.036
WPMS16
−0.105
−0.083
0.019
WPMS17
−0.066
−0.028
0.036
WPMS18
0.305
0.322
0.025
WPMS19
−0.034
−0.003
0.029
WPMS20
0.111
0.131
0.023
WPMS21
−0.057
−0.027
0.028
WPMS22
0.563
0.578
0.035
Mean
0.119
0.166
0.058
s.e.
0.060
0.062
0.014
s.e.: standard error.Microsatellites isolated from nuclear as well as chloroplast genomes were employed for the analysis of genetic diversity and genetic structure in various poplar species [42, 44–60]. Levels of intrapopulation genetic diversity observed by us in native aspen stands were within the range of values commonly observed in poplars and estimated by SSR loci analysis ([47] and references therein).A substantial number of studies employing microsatellite technique were focused on the detection of hybridization in natural [31, 46, 61–63] or artificial [64] stands of poplars. SSR loci help to reveal mechanisms of interspecific crossing and reproductive isolation [65–67]. In this study we concentrated on among-individual and among-population variation rather than on interspecific differences, but with respect to some of the studied elite clones their hybrid origin should be genetically tested using a complex set of markers but of nuclear and cytoplasmic localization. Hi-fidelity identification of interspecific hybrids and industrial clones was reported in a considerable number of publications [5, 6, 51, 68–74]. A remarkable publication reports on the genetic identity of some industrial clones of poplars previously treated as different [68, 69].The practical task of identity monitoring of commercial clones inin vitro collections [75, 76] was similar to that employed in the present research. In all applications where reliable individual identification was required SSRs showed high effectiveness.


## 4. Conclusion

Application of nuclear microsatellite loci for genetic identification and assessment of genetic variability in aspen elite clones and native stands showed high effectiveness of the developed low-cost SSR-based testing system. Reliable authentication of clones ensures genetic monitoring of microclonal propagation and allows revealing clonality in native stands. We demonstrated that the same set of microsatellite loci can be successfully employed for estimation of levels of intra- and interpopulation genetic variability in aspen. Reconstruction of kinship among individual elite clones or genetic relationships of naturally mating populations are perspective tasks that can be realized in the future using the same markers.



---

*Source: 261518-2015-12-28.xml*