# Clusters of Healthcare-Associated Legionnaires’ Disease in Two Hospitals of Central Greece

Authors: Maria A. Kyritsi; Varvara A. Mouchtouri; Anna Katsiafliaka; Foteini Kolokythopoulou; Elias Plakokefalos; Vasileios Nakoulas; George Rachiotis; Christos Hadjichristodoulou
Journal: Case Reports in Infectious Diseases
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Healthcare-associated Legionnaires’ disease often leads to fatal respiratory tract infection among hospitalized patients. In this report, three cases of Legionnaires’ disease among patients in two different hospitals (Hospital A and Hospital B) were investigated. After conducting an epidemiologic and environmental investigation, the water distribution systems (WDSs) were identified as the possible source of infection, asLegionella pneumophila serogroup 1 (Lp1) was isolated from both clinical and environmental samples. Patients received aerosol therapy with nebulizers during their hospitalization. Based on the results of the investigation, the hospitals’ infection control committees reviewed their policies for Legionnaires’ disease prevention and implemented control measures focusing on using sterile fluids for aerosol treatments.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Legionnaires’ disease (LD) is a severe pneumonia that can result in multisystem illness with fatal outcome. It is transmitted through inhalation of water aerosols contaminated withLegionella spp. bacteria. Legionnaires’ disease can be acquired through travel (e.g., cruise ships and hotels), in the community and within the healthcare system. LD is also a significant cause of hospital-acquired pneumonia with very high mortality rates (40–80%) especially in immunocompromised patients when left untreated (WHO, 2011). Even when it is timely diagnosed and the proper therapy is followed, the rates remain high (5–30% among immunocompromised patients and 10–15% in immunocompetent patients) [1, 2].Legionella spp. are very common members of the water microbiome inhabiting to the building plumbing systems [3, 4]. In healthcare facilities, the potential sources of transmission are hot- and cold-water supply systems [5], cooling towers and evaporative condensers [6, 7], ice machines [8], and respiratory devices [9, 10]. Water distribution systems in hospitals can favor the growth of Legionella, especially into the hot water circulation systems when these are old and complex [11, 12].In 2014, the countries of the European Union and the European Economic Area reported 486 nosocomial cases of Legionnaires’ disease, representing 7% of the total reported cases with a known setting of infection (ECDC 2016). In the United States, up to 25% of all the cases ofLegionellosis reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were hospital acquired [13, 14].Four studies in Greece have shown that 27.3% to 75% of hospital water systems are colonized withLegionella spp. [15–18]. However, the number of nosocomial infections caused by Legionella spp. reported to European Legionnaires Disease Network (ELDSNET) of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) is low; in 2014, Greece reported eleven cases of healthcare-related Legionnaires’ disease [19, 20].


## 2. Case Investigation

### 2.1. Hospital A

In December 2009, a 65-year-old male stroke patient (patient 1) was admitted to Hospital A with aspiration pneumonia. Hospital A is a University Hospital, located in Central Greece of 650-bed size capacity. The patient was hospitalized to the internal medicine ward, and during the hospitalization, he received aerosolized treatment with a nebulizer. The initial improvement of the patient’s clinical condition was followed by a sudden relapse with dyspnoea and chest pain and was transferred to the ICU. Chest X-ray showed the typical findings of pneumonia. Urine samples for the urinary soluble antigen were positive forLegionella pneumophila sg 1 (Lp sg 1). A bronchioalveolar lavage (BAL) sample was polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive for Legionella spp., and Lp sg 1 was isolated from culture of the same BAL sample. The patient was treated with intravenous azithromycin in combination with a fluoroquinolone for 14 days and fully recovered.A second Legionnaires’ disease case (patient 2) was identified in the same hospital four months later. The patient was a 65-year-old male patient with pulmonary edema and admitted to the cardiology ward for 10 days. Patient 2 also received oxygen through a nebulizer. He was subsequently discharged on the 10th day of hospitalization, but was readmitted 24 hours later with high fever, respiratory distress, and neurological symptoms. His chest X-ray showed pneumonia, and his urine antigen test was positive forLp sg 1. No further clinical samples were evaluated. The patient was also treated with intravenous azithromycin in combination with a fluoroquinolone during the hospitalization in the ICU and died on the 30th day.In Hospital A, water samplings forLegionella spp. and inspections were conducted in April, May, and September. Areas with stagnant water were identified; a long stagnant line was found at the neonatal ICU and in the storage rooms of cardiology and internal medicine wards. Corroded surfaces and scale in the shower heads and taps, as a release of drift in the surrounding areas from the cooling towers, were observed. Furthermore, the mean temperature of 46°C that was measured in the hot-water distribution system supported Legionella spp. growth. Residual disinfectant (chlorine) levels were above 0.2 mg/l in all samples measured. Microbiological analysis of the samples was performed according to ISO 11731:1998 [21]. Results of microbiological analysis of the water samples showed colonization of the water distribution system with Legionella spp. In particular, Lp sg 1 was isolated from five water samples including the patients’ room in the cardiology department at levels that ranged from 100 to 7.5 × 103 cfu/L depending on the point of collection. Samples collected from the nebulizer were not sterile but were Legionella negative.The clinical isolate from patient A and the two environmental isolates were sequence-based typed (SBT) [22] and found to be ST1 with an allelic profile 1,4,3,1,1,1,1 according to the European Working Group for Legionella Infections Classification (http://www.ewgli.org). The results of the microbiological and molecular analysis of the water samples and the nebulizers from Hospital A are presented in detail in Table 1.Table 1
Microbiological analysis results of environmental samples forLegionella spp. detection from Hospital A.
Hospital A
Sampling date
Sampling point
Result
Culture (cfu/L)∗
SBT§
26th April
Cardiology department: shower head
2 × 103 Lp sg 1˚
—
Cardiology department: nebulizer, swab
Negative
—
Cardiology department: drinking-water fountain
100Lp sg 1˚200 Lp sg 2–14
—
Cardiology department: cardiology ICU’s‡ water distribution system
Negative
—
18th May
Cardiology department: storage room, bathroom
3 × 103 Lp sg 1˚
ST-1: 1,4,3,1,1,1,1
Cardiology department: room 542, swab (patient 1)
Negative
—
Cardiology department: room 548, nebulizer, swab (patient 2)
Negative
—
Cardiology department: drinking-water fountain
2.3 × 104 Lp sg˚ 2–14˚
—
Internal medicine department: room 510
Negative
—
Boiler number 6
Negative
—
Water softener outlet
Negative
—
Cooling tower number 1
Negative
—
Cooling tower number 3
100Legionella spp.
—
6th September
Technical staff offices: drinking fountain
2 × 103 Lp sg 2–14800 Legionella spp.
—
Cooling tower 1
9.6 × 104 Legionella spp.
—
Cooling tower 3
1.6 × 105 Legionella spp.
—
Cooling tower 5
5.9 × 104 Legionella spp.
—
Boiler number 1
Negative
—
Boiler number 2
Negative
—
Cardiology department: drinking-water fountain, swab
Negative
—
Cardiology department: room 542, shower
100Legionella spp.
—
Internal medicine department: room 510
Negative
—
Internal medicine department: storage room (stagnant line)
7.5 × 103 Lp sg 1˚4 × 103 Legionella spp.
ST-1: 1,4,3,1,1,1,1
Cardiology department: storage room (stagnant line)
Negative
—
∗Colony-forming units per liter; §sequence-based typing; ˚Legionella pneumophila serogroup; ‡intensive care unit.


### 2.2. Hospital B

In January 2012, in a regional hospital of 320-bed size capacity (Hospital B) located 150 km from Hospital A, an 80-year-old male patient, receiving chronic treatment with steroids for myasthenia gravis, was admitted to ICU due to acute respiratory distress. He remained for four days and was transferred to the neurological ward for additional eight days. During his hospitalization, he also received aerosolized treatment with a nebulizer. Forty-eight hours after he was discharged, he was admitted to the ICU of Hospital A with high fever, dyspnoea, and mild manifestations from the central nervous system. Chest X-ray findings were compatible with those of pneumonia. Similarly, urine antigen testing was positive forLp sg 1. BAL was positive for Legionella by PCR and Lp sg 1 by culture. The patient was treated with intravenous azithromycin in combination with a fluoroquinolone for 21 days and fully recovered.The water distribution system in Hospital B was monitored regularly for the presence ofLegionella spp. After the case of Legionnaires’ disease was confirmed, additional sampling was conducted focusing on the patient’s room (shower) and the nebulizer. Sites in the hot-water distribution system demonstrated mean temperatures of 43.5°C, and only a few areas with stagnant water were identified. Lp sg 1 was isolated from the patients’ room shower in concentrations of 1 × 103 cfu/L. The swab from the patient’s nebulizer was positive for Lpn sg 1. The Lp sg 1 isolates were then typed by sequence-based typing. The patient’s isolate and the two environmental isolates were found the same (ST1, allelic profile 1,4,3,1,1,1,1). The dates, the points of sampling as well as the results of the microbiological and molecular analyses from Hospital B are shown in detail Table 2.Table 2
Microbiological analysis results of environmental samples forLegionella spp. detection from Hospital B.
Hospital B
Sampling date
Sampling point
Result
Culture (cfu/L)∗
SBT§
23th February
Neurology department
Negative
—
Patients’ room
103 Lp sg 1˚
ST-1: 1,4,3,1,1,1,1
Patients’nebulizer, swab
Lp sg 1˚
ST-1: 1,4,3,1,1,1,1
∗Colony-forming units per liter; §sequence-based typing; ˚Legionella pneumophila serogroup.


### 2.3. Patient’s Home

Six additional water samples were collected by the regional public health authorities from the shower head and the taps from the patient’s home who was admitted at Hospital B.No sample was positive forLp sg 1.


## 2.1. Hospital A

In December 2009, a 65-year-old male stroke patient (patient 1) was admitted to Hospital A with aspiration pneumonia. Hospital A is a University Hospital, located in Central Greece of 650-bed size capacity. The patient was hospitalized to the internal medicine ward, and during the hospitalization, he received aerosolized treatment with a nebulizer. The initial improvement of the patient’s clinical condition was followed by a sudden relapse with dyspnoea and chest pain and was transferred to the ICU. Chest X-ray showed the typical findings of pneumonia. Urine samples for the urinary soluble antigen were positive forLegionella pneumophila sg 1 (Lp sg 1). A bronchioalveolar lavage (BAL) sample was polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive for Legionella spp., and Lp sg 1 was isolated from culture of the same BAL sample. The patient was treated with intravenous azithromycin in combination with a fluoroquinolone for 14 days and fully recovered.A second Legionnaires’ disease case (patient 2) was identified in the same hospital four months later. The patient was a 65-year-old male patient with pulmonary edema and admitted to the cardiology ward for 10 days. Patient 2 also received oxygen through a nebulizer. He was subsequently discharged on the 10th day of hospitalization, but was readmitted 24 hours later with high fever, respiratory distress, and neurological symptoms. His chest X-ray showed pneumonia, and his urine antigen test was positive forLp sg 1. No further clinical samples were evaluated. The patient was also treated with intravenous azithromycin in combination with a fluoroquinolone during the hospitalization in the ICU and died on the 30th day.In Hospital A, water samplings forLegionella spp. and inspections were conducted in April, May, and September. Areas with stagnant water were identified; a long stagnant line was found at the neonatal ICU and in the storage rooms of cardiology and internal medicine wards. Corroded surfaces and scale in the shower heads and taps, as a release of drift in the surrounding areas from the cooling towers, were observed. Furthermore, the mean temperature of 46°C that was measured in the hot-water distribution system supported Legionella spp. growth. Residual disinfectant (chlorine) levels were above 0.2 mg/l in all samples measured. Microbiological analysis of the samples was performed according to ISO 11731:1998 [21]. Results of microbiological analysis of the water samples showed colonization of the water distribution system with Legionella spp. In particular, Lp sg 1 was isolated from five water samples including the patients’ room in the cardiology department at levels that ranged from 100 to 7.5 × 103 cfu/L depending on the point of collection. Samples collected from the nebulizer were not sterile but were Legionella negative.The clinical isolate from patient A and the two environmental isolates were sequence-based typed (SBT) [22] and found to be ST1 with an allelic profile 1,4,3,1,1,1,1 according to the European Working Group for Legionella Infections Classification (http://www.ewgli.org). The results of the microbiological and molecular analysis of the water samples and the nebulizers from Hospital A are presented in detail in Table 1.Table 1
Microbiological analysis results of environmental samples forLegionella spp. detection from Hospital A.
Hospital A
Sampling date
Sampling point
Result
Culture (cfu/L)∗
SBT§
26th April
Cardiology department: shower head
2 × 103 Lp sg 1˚
—
Cardiology department: nebulizer, swab
Negative
—
Cardiology department: drinking-water fountain
100Lp sg 1˚200 Lp sg 2–14
—
Cardiology department: cardiology ICU’s‡ water distribution system
Negative
—
18th May
Cardiology department: storage room, bathroom
3 × 103 Lp sg 1˚
ST-1: 1,4,3,1,1,1,1
Cardiology department: room 542, swab (patient 1)
Negative
—
Cardiology department: room 548, nebulizer, swab (patient 2)
Negative
—
Cardiology department: drinking-water fountain
2.3 × 104 Lp sg˚ 2–14˚
—
Internal medicine department: room 510
Negative
—
Boiler number 6
Negative
—
Water softener outlet
Negative
—
Cooling tower number 1
Negative
—
Cooling tower number 3
100Legionella spp.
—
6th September
Technical staff offices: drinking fountain
2 × 103 Lp sg 2–14800 Legionella spp.
—
Cooling tower 1
9.6 × 104 Legionella spp.
—
Cooling tower 3
1.6 × 105 Legionella spp.
—
Cooling tower 5
5.9 × 104 Legionella spp.
—
Boiler number 1
Negative
—
Boiler number 2
Negative
—
Cardiology department: drinking-water fountain, swab
Negative
—
Cardiology department: room 542, shower
100Legionella spp.
—
Internal medicine department: room 510
Negative
—
Internal medicine department: storage room (stagnant line)
7.5 × 103 Lp sg 1˚4 × 103 Legionella spp.
ST-1: 1,4,3,1,1,1,1
Cardiology department: storage room (stagnant line)
Negative
—
∗Colony-forming units per liter; §sequence-based typing; ˚Legionella pneumophila serogroup; ‡intensive care unit.


## 2.2. Hospital B

In January 2012, in a regional hospital of 320-bed size capacity (Hospital B) located 150 km from Hospital A, an 80-year-old male patient, receiving chronic treatment with steroids for myasthenia gravis, was admitted to ICU due to acute respiratory distress. He remained for four days and was transferred to the neurological ward for additional eight days. During his hospitalization, he also received aerosolized treatment with a nebulizer. Forty-eight hours after he was discharged, he was admitted to the ICU of Hospital A with high fever, dyspnoea, and mild manifestations from the central nervous system. Chest X-ray findings were compatible with those of pneumonia. Similarly, urine antigen testing was positive forLp sg 1. BAL was positive for Legionella by PCR and Lp sg 1 by culture. The patient was treated with intravenous azithromycin in combination with a fluoroquinolone for 21 days and fully recovered.The water distribution system in Hospital B was monitored regularly for the presence ofLegionella spp. After the case of Legionnaires’ disease was confirmed, additional sampling was conducted focusing on the patient’s room (shower) and the nebulizer. Sites in the hot-water distribution system demonstrated mean temperatures of 43.5°C, and only a few areas with stagnant water were identified. Lp sg 1 was isolated from the patients’ room shower in concentrations of 1 × 103 cfu/L. The swab from the patient’s nebulizer was positive for Lpn sg 1. The Lp sg 1 isolates were then typed by sequence-based typing. The patient’s isolate and the two environmental isolates were found the same (ST1, allelic profile 1,4,3,1,1,1,1). The dates, the points of sampling as well as the results of the microbiological and molecular analyses from Hospital B are shown in detail Table 2.Table 2
Microbiological analysis results of environmental samples forLegionella spp. detection from Hospital B.
Hospital B
Sampling date
Sampling point
Result
Culture (cfu/L)∗
SBT§
23th February
Neurology department
Negative
—
Patients’ room
103 Lp sg 1˚
ST-1: 1,4,3,1,1,1,1
Patients’nebulizer, swab
Lp sg 1˚
ST-1: 1,4,3,1,1,1,1
∗Colony-forming units per liter; §sequence-based typing; ˚Legionella pneumophila serogroup.


## 2.3. Patient’s Home

Six additional water samples were collected by the regional public health authorities from the shower head and the taps from the patient’s home who was admitted at Hospital B.No sample was positive forLp sg 1.


## 3. Discussion

In this report, we performed an epidemiological investigation of three Legionnaires’ disease cases in two different hospitals. All cases were considered hospital-acquired since there were no clinical or laboratory evidence of pneumonia on admission, and their hospitalization lasted at least 10 days [23–26]. In Hospital A, patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia, immunocompromised patients with pneumonia, patients with risk factors for legionellosis, and patients with pneumonia who do not respond to broad-spectrum beta-lactam therapy without identification of resistant bacteria, are tested for Legionella with the urine antigen test. Nevertheless, there could be missing Legionnaires’ disease cases since the urine antigen test does not detect Lp sg 2–15 strains.Even though water sampling forLegionella detection was performed every six months and residual disinfectant levels were maintained above 0.2 mg/l in both hospitals, inspections revealed the presence of hazardous conditions that favored Legionella growth such as stagnant water points, corroded surfaces, and scale in the shower heads and taps and in the poor temperature control. The conditions mentioned above in combination with the complex hospital water systems with numerous pipe loops were responsible for the variations in Legionella detection levels. Also, a release of drift in the surrounding areas from the cooling towers was recorded.The third case described in this paper had complete epidemiologic and molecular evidence that acquisition was from the use of tap water with the nebulizer. Molecular typing of the isolates (patient 3 clinical and environmental isolates from Hospital B and the nebulizer; patient 2 clinical and Hospital A environmental isolate) were the same sequence type suggesting use of tap water in the nebulizers as the possible source of infection.Lp ST1 is the most frequent isolated type during outbreak investigations in many countries [27], and it is also considered to be a major cause of nosocomial-acquired Legionnaires’ disease [28]. Recent studies proved that ST1 strains demonstrate high single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) similarity, even if they are not epidemiologically related [28, 29]. The same studies proposed that Legionnaires’ disease is probably caused by certain clones of L. pneumophila adapted to cause disease in human hosts. These clones, who demonstrate a very low evolutionary rate because they differ only in a few SNPs, have spread throughout the world rapidly [28]. Nevertheless, it is generally recommended that at least genomic data from 3 environmental stains should be compared to clinical isolates to support epidemiologic investigations in order to identify the source [29].After the microbiological results and the conclusions form the inspections, thermal disinfection was applied in the water distribution systems of both hospitals as it was described by Mouchtouri et al. [18], and recommendations for constant maintenance of the hot water temperature between 55 and 60°C were made. Furthermore, the cooling towers of Hospital A were superchlorinated following the European Working Group for Legionella Infections 2011 technical guidelines [22].We were informed during the inspection, by the Infection Control Committee, that the guidelines that specify that only sterilized fluids should be used for aerosolized treatment were not uniformly applied. These infection control breaches along with the molecular typing data that the conserved ST1 clones can easily spread and colonize nearby hospitals and cause nosocomial LD. Based on the results of our investigation, the Infection Control Committee decided to reinforce the policy of using sterile water for the oxygen nebulizer and communicated this incidence to the ministry of health in order to provide guidance to all the Greek hospitals [30]. Specific guidance was given to the two hospitals as well as to all Greek hospitals through the Ministry of Health, based on CDC guidelines, regarding the policy of nebulizers’ disinfection and the use of sterile water through ministerial circular [30–32]. The circular provided guidance on the disinfection of nebulizers between treatments on the same patient and between different patients including cleaning, disinfection with chlorine at a concentration of 50 mg/L with one-hour contact time, rinsing with sterile water and drying, or alternative methods depending on the type of the nebulizer. Moreover, the circular emphasized the importance of using sterile fluid for nebulization and dispensing of the fluid into the nebulizer aseptically.Since colonization of the hospitals in Greece has been documented [15, 16], efforts should focus on regular application of control measures and active surveillance for early detection of nosocomial cases. Currently, the most effective approach to ensure appropriate water quality, according to the World Health Organization, is the development of the Water Safety Plan [23, 33].


## 4. Conclusions

Confirmation of the source of acquisition of healthcare-associated Legionnaires’ disease cases could be notably challenging especially for patients with consecutive hospitalizations in different settings, since the disease-associatedL. pneumophila clones display high molecular similarity. The use of respiratory equipment and their cleaning and disinfection practices should be carefully examined by the investigators. Training and awareness of hospital healthcare and technical personnel are essential for the prevention of hospital-acquired Legionnaires’ disease.



---

*Source: 2570758-2018-08-15.xml*