# Plasma-Mediated Immobilization of Antibody with PEG as Spacer for Enhanced Endothelial Cell Adhesion and Proliferation

Authors: Yuan Yuan; Jing Zhang; Min Yin; Changsheng Liu
Journal: Advances in Biomaterials
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Immobilization of anti-CD34 antibody is proven to be an effective strategy to accelerate reendothelialization and thereby lower the thrombosis of blood contacting grafts. To realize highly efficient immobilization of anti-CD34 antibody, an argon cold plasma-mediated graft process was developed with PEG as spacer arm in this study. In this process, the 316L stainless steel (316LSS) model substrate was first coated with ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) followed by argon plasma treatment and PEG400 modification (EVA-PEG). The EVA-PEG was further ignited by argon plasma and then the anti-CD34 antibody was immobilized. XPS measurement indicated the successful immobilization of the EVA and the anti-CD34 antibody molecules. Compared with the anti-CD34 antibody anchored without PEG, the immobilized EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 antibody exhibited better capturing efficiency (increase about 1-fold) of specific antigen. Consequently, the endothelial cell attachment (before 12 h) and proliferation (1~4 days) were significantly improved. Further study showed that this EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 coating could reduce blood coagulation. Therefore, this cold plasma-mediated graft process with PEG spacer arm developed here is a promising strategy to immobilize antibody with higher bioactivity for rapid reendothelialization of the cardiovascular implants.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Coronary artery stenting has made tremendous success in the treatment of coronary artery disease [1–3]. In particular, the drug-eluting stents, which incorporate drugs that can effectively reduce the proliferation and migration of smooth muscle, have been developed and several clinically proven products (Cypher, Taxus, etc.) are currently available on market [2, 3]. Unfortunately, the Late Angiographic Stent Thrombosis (LAST) continues to be a major challenge, which often leads to the failure of stent implantation in clinic. It is well-accepted that the poor endothelium-paving, either due to the injury to and loss of the endothelium or the retard endothelialization in/after implantation, is the important contributor to this thrombosis [4–6]. Therefore, from this viewpoint, accelerating reendothelialization or relining at denudated regions after implantation should be the most effective strategy to improve the clinic patency rate, particularly in small and medium diameter vascular prostheses.To achieve rapid reendothelialization, many different approaches have been developed in the past few years, including active endothelial cell coating [7, 8] and EC-compatible layer [9]. Among them, anti-CD34 antibody-grafted stent, which can specifically identify and capture the circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and neighboring endothelial cells (ECs) via the unique high-affinity interactions between the coated antibodies and the specific antigen CD34 markers on cell surface, appears to be the most attractive [10–12]. As an antibody, both the quantity and the presentation of the anti-CD34 antibody on stent surface play critical roles in the ensuing bioactivity. Unfortunately, till now, most available approaches for antibody immobilization lie on either passive physical adsorption [13, 14] or covalent cross-linking reactionsvia the linkage moieties [15, 16]. Consequently, these antibody molecules are closely anchored on the matrix surface, which not only affects the amount of antibody immobilized but also often leads to the reduction of the binding capacity of the antibody toward antigen. In addition, the process for antibody graft often impacts the bioactivity of antibody. Therefore, there is a great need to develop an alternative anti-CD34 antibody immobilization strategy to fabricate high-performance antibody-coated blood grafts.Herein, we developed a cold plasma-mediated grafting process for the immobilization of anti-CD34 antibody on the blood-contact materials. Also, to extend the bioactive site away from the surface and thus improve the accessibility of the anchored antibody, PEG was used as a spacer arm. To achieve this aim, 316L stainless steel (316LSS), a commonly used intravascular prosthesis, was selected as model substrate, on which the ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer, extensively used on biomedical implant due to good stability, elasticity, and biocompatibility [17, 18], was firstly coated and followed by PEG and anti-CD34 antibody. Prior to the PEG and antibody immobilization, the EVA and EVA-PEG surface were all treated by argon cold plasma. For comparison, the anti-CD34 was also directly grafted on EVA. The modified coating surfaces were analyzed by XPS and water contact angles. The amount of the antibody immobilized and the binding capacity of the antibody/antigen were assayed. And the “in vitro” response of endothelial cells and the platelet adhesion on various surfaces were investigated.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Biomedical 316LSS was purchased from Shanghai Biomedical Metal Company, China. EVA (28 wt% of vinyl acetate) and PEG (Mw=400) were obtained from Shanghai Chemical Engineering Research Institute (China) and Jinan Dai Gang Biological Technology Co. (Jinan, China). The antibody (monoclonal mouse anti-human CD34 antibody) and CD34 were purchased from Gene. Tech. Co., Ltd., China. The human umbilical cord veins’ endothelial cells (HUVECs) were obtained from China Centre for Type Culture Collection. RPMI-1640 medium was purchased from Gibco Co. (USA). Fetal calf serum (FCS), L-glutamine, periodate sodium, borohydride sodium, and rhodamine were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).


### 2.2. Methods

#### 2.2.1. Preparation of EVA Coatings onto 316LSS

The biomedical 316LSS slides (1 × 1 cm2) were polished and ultrasonically cleaned with isopropanol in advance. After that, 4% EVA solution was spin-coated onto 316LSS slides and evaporated under vacuum at 60°C for 24 h. Then, the coatings were kept under vacuum at room temperature for later application.


#### 2.2.2. Immobilization of PEG as Spacer Arm

To generate appropriate active site, the EVA-coated 316LSS was pretreated with argon plasma. The plasma set-up, the same as described in [19], consists of a reactor system, gas flow system and an RF power source (13.56 MHz) with a matching network (Model-SPII), shielding, and a vacuum system. The EVA-SS substrates were subjected to argon plasma (20 Pa, 100 w) treatment for 1 min and then immediately soaked in 5% PEG400 solution (w/w in 95% ethanol) for 15 min at room temperature. After that, the samples were dried at 120°C for 60 min. This EVA coating after PEG modification was named EVA-PEG.


#### 2.2.3. Immobilization of Anti-CD34 with PEG as Spacer

The above EVA-PEG slides were further used for immobilization of anti-CD34 antibody. Briefly, the EVA-PEG slides were subjected to argon plasma (20 Pa, 100 w) treatment for 1 min again. And then, the slides were immediately immersed in 20μg/mL anti-CD34 solution and incubated for 2 h at 4°C. To avoid the nonspecific adsorption, this EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 slide was incubated with 1% BSA solution at room temperature for another 2 h.To immobilize anti-CD34 without PEG spacer, the above plasma-treated EVA was directly immersed into in 20μg/mL anti-CD34 solution and incubated for 2 h at 4°C. Likewise, the EVA-anti-CD34 slide was incubated with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution at room temperature for another 2 h.To prepare the EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 and EVA-anti-CD34 samples for cell culture, the anti-CD34 solution was sterilized by filtration (0.22μm in diameter). And the experiments were all carried out in sterilized cleaning room.


#### 2.2.4. Surface Characterization

The chemical composition changes of the 316LSS-EVA before and after antibody immobilization were investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, MICROLAB MKaII, VG, UK). X-rays were generated with an Mg anode at a power of 300 W. A constant take-off angle of 90° with respect to the sample surface was used. The base pressure in the analysis chamber was 1 × 10−6Pa. The surface charge effect was neutralized by the flood gun. Wide scan spectra in the 1000.0 eV binding energy range were recorded with pass energy of 50 eV for all samples. Core level scans were taken for carbon at pass energy of 0.1 eV.To explore the change of the surface hydrophilicity, the substrates were characterized by static water contact angle measurements using JC2000A system (Shanghai Zhongchen Digital Equipment Co., Ltd., China) equipped with Panasonic GL350 camera. For this purpose, water droplets each of approximately 10μL were mounted over five different places on the surface of the substrate. The mean of θ value was calculated as an average of the number of measures taken.


#### 2.2.5. Binding Capacity of the Antibody/Antigen

The adsorption amount of anti-CD34 and the binding capacity of the anti-CD34 immobilized to CD34 with and without PEG were investigated and compared. Prior to adsorption, the anti-CD34 and the CD34 were first labeled with rhodamine according to the protocol of EZ-Label rhodamine Protein Labeling Kit. Briefly, BupH Borate Buffer Pack was reconstituted with 500 mL of ultrapure water and 100μL anti-CD34/CD34 solution was dialysed into BupH Borate Buffer to a concentration of 1 mg/mL. Rhodamine labeling reagent was completely dissolved in 100 μL of dimethyl formamide (DMF). After that, 100 μL anti-CD34/CD34 solution and an appropriate amount of rhodamine solution were mixed and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, excess unbound fluorescent dye was removed by dialysis against 1x phosphate buffer solution (PBS).To investigate the amount of anti-CD34 adsorbed with and without PEG, EVA and EVA-PEG slides after plasma pretreatment were directly incubated with the 15μg/mL rhodamine-labeled anti-CD34 solution at 4°C for 24 h. After being thoroughly rinsed with distilled water and blown dry, the fluorescent intensity after rhodamine-anti-CD34 adsorption was measured on Biochip reader (HD-2001A).To assess the immunoreaction bioactivity, the EVA-anti-CD34 and EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 slides were first blocked with 1% BSA at room temperature for 2 h and then incubated with 100μg/mL rhodamine-labeled CD34 solution at 4°C for another 2 h. The fluorescent intensity was also measured on the aforementioned Biochip reader.


#### 2.2.6. Cell Culture

The HUVECs were incubated in a culture medium consisting of 20% (v/v) FCS and 80% RPMI-1640 supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin in humidified air containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.To investigate and compare the cell attachment in the initial period, the substrates (including EVA, EVA-PEG, EVA-anti-CD34, and EVA-PEG-anti-CD34) were kept in 24-well plates and the HUVECs were seeded at a cell density of 5 × 104 cells per well. After 4 h, the cells were digested with 0.25% trypsin solution and the number of cells attached on different surfaces was determined by hemocytometer counting.For cell growth studies, the samples were prepared with the same procedure. Cells were seeded at a density of 2.5 × 104 cells per well. The culture media were replenished every second day. After 1, 2, 3, and 4 days, the cells grown on samples were treated and the number of cells grown on the samples was determined by the same method as the above-mentioned one.The morphologies of the cells on different substrates after seeding for 12 h were observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. The samples were washed with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) to remove the unattached cells. The HUVECs were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution for 1 h at 4°C. Then, the samples were labeled by FITC fluorescence according to the labeling kit protocol (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). The morphologies of the cells were observed under a confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM, MRC-1024, Bio-Rad, USA).


#### 2.2.7.In Vitro Platelet Studies

For platelet adhesion studies, fresh human blood anticoagulated with acid citrate dextrose was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min to obtain platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The samples were submerged with PRP for 1 h at 37°C in an incubator. After washing gently with PBS to remove nonadhering platelets, fixing was done with 2.5% buffered glutaraldehyde solution for 1 h at 37°C. Specimens were then dehydrated with 50, 70, 95, and 100 dilutions of ethanol and water and dried. All specimens were coated with a gold layer and observed with SEM (JSM-6360LV, JEOL, Japan).


#### 2.2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences were considered to be significant at a level ofP<0.05.


## 2.1. Materials

Biomedical 316LSS was purchased from Shanghai Biomedical Metal Company, China. EVA (28 wt% of vinyl acetate) and PEG (Mw=400) were obtained from Shanghai Chemical Engineering Research Institute (China) and Jinan Dai Gang Biological Technology Co. (Jinan, China). The antibody (monoclonal mouse anti-human CD34 antibody) and CD34 were purchased from Gene. Tech. Co., Ltd., China. The human umbilical cord veins’ endothelial cells (HUVECs) were obtained from China Centre for Type Culture Collection. RPMI-1640 medium was purchased from Gibco Co. (USA). Fetal calf serum (FCS), L-glutamine, periodate sodium, borohydride sodium, and rhodamine were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).


## 2.2. Methods

### 2.2.1. Preparation of EVA Coatings onto 316LSS

The biomedical 316LSS slides (1 × 1 cm2) were polished and ultrasonically cleaned with isopropanol in advance. After that, 4% EVA solution was spin-coated onto 316LSS slides and evaporated under vacuum at 60°C for 24 h. Then, the coatings were kept under vacuum at room temperature for later application.


### 2.2.2. Immobilization of PEG as Spacer Arm

To generate appropriate active site, the EVA-coated 316LSS was pretreated with argon plasma. The plasma set-up, the same as described in [19], consists of a reactor system, gas flow system and an RF power source (13.56 MHz) with a matching network (Model-SPII), shielding, and a vacuum system. The EVA-SS substrates were subjected to argon plasma (20 Pa, 100 w) treatment for 1 min and then immediately soaked in 5% PEG400 solution (w/w in 95% ethanol) for 15 min at room temperature. After that, the samples were dried at 120°C for 60 min. This EVA coating after PEG modification was named EVA-PEG.


### 2.2.3. Immobilization of Anti-CD34 with PEG as Spacer

The above EVA-PEG slides were further used for immobilization of anti-CD34 antibody. Briefly, the EVA-PEG slides were subjected to argon plasma (20 Pa, 100 w) treatment for 1 min again. And then, the slides were immediately immersed in 20μg/mL anti-CD34 solution and incubated for 2 h at 4°C. To avoid the nonspecific adsorption, this EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 slide was incubated with 1% BSA solution at room temperature for another 2 h.To immobilize anti-CD34 without PEG spacer, the above plasma-treated EVA was directly immersed into in 20μg/mL anti-CD34 solution and incubated for 2 h at 4°C. Likewise, the EVA-anti-CD34 slide was incubated with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution at room temperature for another 2 h.To prepare the EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 and EVA-anti-CD34 samples for cell culture, the anti-CD34 solution was sterilized by filtration (0.22μm in diameter). And the experiments were all carried out in sterilized cleaning room.


### 2.2.4. Surface Characterization

The chemical composition changes of the 316LSS-EVA before and after antibody immobilization were investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, MICROLAB MKaII, VG, UK). X-rays were generated with an Mg anode at a power of 300 W. A constant take-off angle of 90° with respect to the sample surface was used. The base pressure in the analysis chamber was 1 × 10−6Pa. The surface charge effect was neutralized by the flood gun. Wide scan spectra in the 1000.0 eV binding energy range were recorded with pass energy of 50 eV for all samples. Core level scans were taken for carbon at pass energy of 0.1 eV.To explore the change of the surface hydrophilicity, the substrates were characterized by static water contact angle measurements using JC2000A system (Shanghai Zhongchen Digital Equipment Co., Ltd., China) equipped with Panasonic GL350 camera. For this purpose, water droplets each of approximately 10μL were mounted over five different places on the surface of the substrate. The mean of θ value was calculated as an average of the number of measures taken.


### 2.2.5. Binding Capacity of the Antibody/Antigen

The adsorption amount of anti-CD34 and the binding capacity of the anti-CD34 immobilized to CD34 with and without PEG were investigated and compared. Prior to adsorption, the anti-CD34 and the CD34 were first labeled with rhodamine according to the protocol of EZ-Label rhodamine Protein Labeling Kit. Briefly, BupH Borate Buffer Pack was reconstituted with 500 mL of ultrapure water and 100μL anti-CD34/CD34 solution was dialysed into BupH Borate Buffer to a concentration of 1 mg/mL. Rhodamine labeling reagent was completely dissolved in 100 μL of dimethyl formamide (DMF). After that, 100 μL anti-CD34/CD34 solution and an appropriate amount of rhodamine solution were mixed and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, excess unbound fluorescent dye was removed by dialysis against 1x phosphate buffer solution (PBS).To investigate the amount of anti-CD34 adsorbed with and without PEG, EVA and EVA-PEG slides after plasma pretreatment were directly incubated with the 15μg/mL rhodamine-labeled anti-CD34 solution at 4°C for 24 h. After being thoroughly rinsed with distilled water and blown dry, the fluorescent intensity after rhodamine-anti-CD34 adsorption was measured on Biochip reader (HD-2001A).To assess the immunoreaction bioactivity, the EVA-anti-CD34 and EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 slides were first blocked with 1% BSA at room temperature for 2 h and then incubated with 100μg/mL rhodamine-labeled CD34 solution at 4°C for another 2 h. The fluorescent intensity was also measured on the aforementioned Biochip reader.


### 2.2.6. Cell Culture

The HUVECs were incubated in a culture medium consisting of 20% (v/v) FCS and 80% RPMI-1640 supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin in humidified air containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.To investigate and compare the cell attachment in the initial period, the substrates (including EVA, EVA-PEG, EVA-anti-CD34, and EVA-PEG-anti-CD34) were kept in 24-well plates and the HUVECs were seeded at a cell density of 5 × 104 cells per well. After 4 h, the cells were digested with 0.25% trypsin solution and the number of cells attached on different surfaces was determined by hemocytometer counting.For cell growth studies, the samples were prepared with the same procedure. Cells were seeded at a density of 2.5 × 104 cells per well. The culture media were replenished every second day. After 1, 2, 3, and 4 days, the cells grown on samples were treated and the number of cells grown on the samples was determined by the same method as the above-mentioned one.The morphologies of the cells on different substrates after seeding for 12 h were observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. The samples were washed with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) to remove the unattached cells. The HUVECs were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution for 1 h at 4°C. Then, the samples were labeled by FITC fluorescence according to the labeling kit protocol (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). The morphologies of the cells were observed under a confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM, MRC-1024, Bio-Rad, USA).


### 2.2.7.In Vitro Platelet Studies

For platelet adhesion studies, fresh human blood anticoagulated with acid citrate dextrose was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min to obtain platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The samples were submerged with PRP for 1 h at 37°C in an incubator. After washing gently with PBS to remove nonadhering platelets, fixing was done with 2.5% buffered glutaraldehyde solution for 1 h at 37°C. Specimens were then dehydrated with 50, 70, 95, and 100 dilutions of ethanol and water and dried. All specimens were coated with a gold layer and observed with SEM (JSM-6360LV, JEOL, Japan).


### 2.2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences were considered to be significant at a level ofP<0.05.


## 2.2.1. Preparation of EVA Coatings onto 316LSS

The biomedical 316LSS slides (1 × 1 cm2) were polished and ultrasonically cleaned with isopropanol in advance. After that, 4% EVA solution was spin-coated onto 316LSS slides and evaporated under vacuum at 60°C for 24 h. Then, the coatings were kept under vacuum at room temperature for later application.


## 2.2.2. Immobilization of PEG as Spacer Arm

To generate appropriate active site, the EVA-coated 316LSS was pretreated with argon plasma. The plasma set-up, the same as described in [19], consists of a reactor system, gas flow system and an RF power source (13.56 MHz) with a matching network (Model-SPII), shielding, and a vacuum system. The EVA-SS substrates were subjected to argon plasma (20 Pa, 100 w) treatment for 1 min and then immediately soaked in 5% PEG400 solution (w/w in 95% ethanol) for 15 min at room temperature. After that, the samples were dried at 120°C for 60 min. This EVA coating after PEG modification was named EVA-PEG.


## 2.2.3. Immobilization of Anti-CD34 with PEG as Spacer

The above EVA-PEG slides were further used for immobilization of anti-CD34 antibody. Briefly, the EVA-PEG slides were subjected to argon plasma (20 Pa, 100 w) treatment for 1 min again. And then, the slides were immediately immersed in 20μg/mL anti-CD34 solution and incubated for 2 h at 4°C. To avoid the nonspecific adsorption, this EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 slide was incubated with 1% BSA solution at room temperature for another 2 h.To immobilize anti-CD34 without PEG spacer, the above plasma-treated EVA was directly immersed into in 20μg/mL anti-CD34 solution and incubated for 2 h at 4°C. Likewise, the EVA-anti-CD34 slide was incubated with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution at room temperature for another 2 h.To prepare the EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 and EVA-anti-CD34 samples for cell culture, the anti-CD34 solution was sterilized by filtration (0.22μm in diameter). And the experiments were all carried out in sterilized cleaning room.


## 2.2.4. Surface Characterization

The chemical composition changes of the 316LSS-EVA before and after antibody immobilization were investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, MICROLAB MKaII, VG, UK). X-rays were generated with an Mg anode at a power of 300 W. A constant take-off angle of 90° with respect to the sample surface was used. The base pressure in the analysis chamber was 1 × 10−6Pa. The surface charge effect was neutralized by the flood gun. Wide scan spectra in the 1000.0 eV binding energy range were recorded with pass energy of 50 eV for all samples. Core level scans were taken for carbon at pass energy of 0.1 eV.To explore the change of the surface hydrophilicity, the substrates were characterized by static water contact angle measurements using JC2000A system (Shanghai Zhongchen Digital Equipment Co., Ltd., China) equipped with Panasonic GL350 camera. For this purpose, water droplets each of approximately 10μL were mounted over five different places on the surface of the substrate. The mean of θ value was calculated as an average of the number of measures taken.


## 2.2.5. Binding Capacity of the Antibody/Antigen

The adsorption amount of anti-CD34 and the binding capacity of the anti-CD34 immobilized to CD34 with and without PEG were investigated and compared. Prior to adsorption, the anti-CD34 and the CD34 were first labeled with rhodamine according to the protocol of EZ-Label rhodamine Protein Labeling Kit. Briefly, BupH Borate Buffer Pack was reconstituted with 500 mL of ultrapure water and 100μL anti-CD34/CD34 solution was dialysed into BupH Borate Buffer to a concentration of 1 mg/mL. Rhodamine labeling reagent was completely dissolved in 100 μL of dimethyl formamide (DMF). After that, 100 μL anti-CD34/CD34 solution and an appropriate amount of rhodamine solution were mixed and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, excess unbound fluorescent dye was removed by dialysis against 1x phosphate buffer solution (PBS).To investigate the amount of anti-CD34 adsorbed with and without PEG, EVA and EVA-PEG slides after plasma pretreatment were directly incubated with the 15μg/mL rhodamine-labeled anti-CD34 solution at 4°C for 24 h. After being thoroughly rinsed with distilled water and blown dry, the fluorescent intensity after rhodamine-anti-CD34 adsorption was measured on Biochip reader (HD-2001A).To assess the immunoreaction bioactivity, the EVA-anti-CD34 and EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 slides were first blocked with 1% BSA at room temperature for 2 h and then incubated with 100μg/mL rhodamine-labeled CD34 solution at 4°C for another 2 h. The fluorescent intensity was also measured on the aforementioned Biochip reader.


## 2.2.6. Cell Culture

The HUVECs were incubated in a culture medium consisting of 20% (v/v) FCS and 80% RPMI-1640 supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin in humidified air containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.To investigate and compare the cell attachment in the initial period, the substrates (including EVA, EVA-PEG, EVA-anti-CD34, and EVA-PEG-anti-CD34) were kept in 24-well plates and the HUVECs were seeded at a cell density of 5 × 104 cells per well. After 4 h, the cells were digested with 0.25% trypsin solution and the number of cells attached on different surfaces was determined by hemocytometer counting.For cell growth studies, the samples were prepared with the same procedure. Cells were seeded at a density of 2.5 × 104 cells per well. The culture media were replenished every second day. After 1, 2, 3, and 4 days, the cells grown on samples were treated and the number of cells grown on the samples was determined by the same method as the above-mentioned one.The morphologies of the cells on different substrates after seeding for 12 h were observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. The samples were washed with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) to remove the unattached cells. The HUVECs were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution for 1 h at 4°C. Then, the samples were labeled by FITC fluorescence according to the labeling kit protocol (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). The morphologies of the cells were observed under a confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM, MRC-1024, Bio-Rad, USA).


## 2.2.7.In Vitro Platelet Studies

For platelet adhesion studies, fresh human blood anticoagulated with acid citrate dextrose was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min to obtain platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The samples were submerged with PRP for 1 h at 37°C in an incubator. After washing gently with PBS to remove nonadhering platelets, fixing was done with 2.5% buffered glutaraldehyde solution for 1 h at 37°C. Specimens were then dehydrated with 50, 70, 95, and 100 dilutions of ethanol and water and dried. All specimens were coated with a gold layer and observed with SEM (JSM-6360LV, JEOL, Japan).


## 2.2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences were considered to be significant at a level ofP<0.05.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Immobilization and Characterization of the Immobilized Anti-CD34

In this study, to maintain the bioactivity of anti-CD34 antibody immobilized on 316LSS, EVA was first coated and followed by PEG as spacer arm. To ensure the efficient immobilization of EVA and antibody, the EVA and EVA-PEG surface were all treated by argon cold plasma in advance (Figure1(a)). For comparison, the anti-CD34 was also directly grafted on EVA (Figure 1(b)).Schematic diagram of the immobilization of anti-CD34 by plasma process (a) without PEG spacer arm and (b) with PEG space.
(a)
(b)To avoid the steric hindrance of the antibody attached, the concentration of the anti-CD34 was preliminarily optimized and fixed at 20μg/mL. The successful immobilizations of PEG400 and anti-CD34 onto the substrate by cold plasma-induced graft process were directly confirmed by the chemical composition determined by XPS analyses. Figure 2 showed the survey XPS spectra of different coating surfaces, where (a), (b), and (c) correspond to EVA, EVA-PEG, and EVA-PEG-anti-CD34, respectively. It can be seen that EVA before and after PEG grafting all exhibited two peaks corresponding to C1s (285 eV) and O1s (532 eV), while, after being further coated with anti-CD34, an additional peak corresponding to N1s (binding energy, 400 eV) emerged, indicating that anti-CD34 was grafted on the substrates. The surface chemical compositions of different coatings were also analyzed. The oxygen content of EVA was increased from 29.3% to 38.63% after PEG grafting, resulting from the high oxygen content of PEG, whereas, after being further treated with anti-CD34, the oxygen content was slightly decreased (37.12%) and a low nitrogen component (4.25%) was observed on the coating surface.Figure 2
Survey XPS spectra of (a) EVA, (b) EVA-PEG, and (c) EVA-PEG-anti-CD34.The high resolution C1s core level scan spectra of different coatings are shown in Figure 3. Deconvolution of the spectra was carried out using a Gaussian curve fitting technique, and the contributions were assumed due to carbon bonding according to other reports [20]. As shown in Figure 3, the C1s peak of EVA can be divided into three peaks corresponding to C–C, C–O, and C=O at 284.5 eV, 285.9 eV, and 288.8 eV, respectively. After PEG grafting, the peak at 284.5 eV decreased, while the peaks at 285.9 eV and 288.8 eV increased. But, after anti-CD34 treatment, the peak at 285.9 eV further increased and an additional peak corresponding to CO–NH at 288 eV appeared.XPS carbon1s core level scan spectra of (a) EVA, (b) EVA-PEG, and (c) EVA-PEG-anti-CD34.
(a)
(b)
(c)Table1 presented the changes of water contact angles after various modifications. As shown, the original water contact angle of EVA coating was 73.2°. But, after further PEG and antibody immobilization, the contact angle decreased to about 55.1° and 25.9°, respectively. These results confirmed the occurrence of grafting of PEG and antibody on the 316LSS-EVA surface again.Table 1
Water contact angles of different surfaces.
Samples
EVA
EVA-PEG
EVA-PEG-anti-CD34
Contact angle (°)
73.2° ± 2.0
55.1° ± 3.6
25.9° ± 1.9


### 3.2. Binding Capacity of Antibody/Antigen on the EVA Surface

The adsorption of anti-CD34 and the subsequent CD34 recognition capacity of the anti-CD34 on different coatings were further examined. At the concentration of 20μg/mL of anti-CD34, as shown in Figure 4, the amount of the IgG adsorbed on EVA-PEG (295 RUF) was obviously higher than that directly immobilized on the EVA surface (150 RUF). Furthermore, the amount of the recognized CD34 by anti-CD34 immobilized on EVA-PEG increased almost 3-fold than EVA surface. We believed that the enhancement of anti-CD34 attached can be attributable to the PEG effect, and the clear increase of affinity binding comes from a desirable orientation of anti-CD34 molecules on EVA-PEG surface.Comparison of the amount (a) and the bioactivity (b) of the anti-CD34 immobilized by different methods. The unlabeled anti-CD34 and the oxidized anti-CD34 were all immobilized at the optimal conditions. And the CD34 was labeled with rhodamine and incubated with the antibody-immobilized samples at the following conditions: antibody concentration, 100μg/mL, for 2 h at 4°C (P*<0.05 versus control group) (P#<0.05 versus EVA-anti-CD34 group).
(a)
(b)


### 3.3. The Attachment and Growth of HUVECs on the Modified Substrate

Figure5 shows the attachment of HUVECs on 316LSS with different modifications after 3, 6, 9, and 12 h of culture, respectively. As shown, EVA-PEG had a slightly enhanced cell attachment compared with the EVA control at the specific time point. But the cell attachment was significantly improved after anti-CD34 immobilization. After 6 h incubation, compared with the control group (EVA), the number of the attached cells on the EVA-anti-CD34 and EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 were increased around 51% and 110%, respectively. This tendency was strengthened after 12 h of culture. Compared to the EVA-anti-CD34, the endothelial cell attachment on EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 surface, after 3, 6, 9, and 12 h cultivation, increased about 1~2-fold. These results suggested that the cell attachment was significantly stimulated by the presence of anti-CD34 antibody immobilized by this plasma-induced process, especially for that immobilized on the EVA-PEG surface.Figure 5
Comparison of the HUVECs attachment on the 316LSS with different modification methods after 12 h of culture. (P*<0.05 versus EVA group at corresponding time point.) (P#<0.05 versus EVA-anti-CD34 group at corresponding time point.)Figure6 shows the growth curves of HUVECs on 316LSS uncoated and coated with anti-CD34 over a period of 4 days. It was found that the cells significantly grew faster on the anti-CD34-modified coating than those substrates without anti-CD34 in the entire study period. The improvement is more obvious after 2 days. In particular, the EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 surface was more favorable for the cell proliferation than the EVA-anti-CD34 surface.Figure 6
Growth of HUVECs on 316LSS with different modification methods after 1, 2, 3, and 4 days of culture. (P*<0.05 versus control group at corresponding time point.) (P#<0.05 versus EVA-anti-CD34 group at corresponding time point.)The morphology of HUVECs after 12 h of incubation on various surfaces was shown in Figure7. The focal points of the HUVECs can be clearly seen and the cultured cells attached to the surface of the 316LSS before and after modification within 12 h cultivation. As shown, HUVECs on EVA and EVA-PEG surfaces did not spread well, showing a wound-shaped morphology. In contrast, on the anti-CD34-containing 316LSS surfaces, not only the number of the HUVECs was greatly increased but also the morphology of the cells was more elongated than those cultured on EVA and EVA-PEG surfaces. Typical cobblestone-like appearance was seen and cells formed a confluent layer on the EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 surface within the 12 h culture.Morphologies of HUVECs (×40) seeded on 316LSS with different modification methods: (a) EVA, (b) EVA-PEG, (c) EVA-anti-CD34, and (d) EVA-PEG-anti-CD34.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.4.In Vitro Haemocompatibility of the Antibody Coating

Figure8 shows the platelet adhesion on different coatings contacting with PRP for 60 min. It can be observed that no obvious platelet adhesion and aggregation were observed on anti-CD34 immobilized surfaces, whereas a high platelet adhesion and aggregated cell platelets (about 4600/mm2) were clearly observed on the unmodified surface.SEM images of the anti-CD34-coated 316LSS with PRP for 60 min: (a) 316LSS and (b) EVA-PEG-anti-CD34.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1. Immobilization and Characterization of the Immobilized Anti-CD34

In this study, to maintain the bioactivity of anti-CD34 antibody immobilized on 316LSS, EVA was first coated and followed by PEG as spacer arm. To ensure the efficient immobilization of EVA and antibody, the EVA and EVA-PEG surface were all treated by argon cold plasma in advance (Figure1(a)). For comparison, the anti-CD34 was also directly grafted on EVA (Figure 1(b)).Schematic diagram of the immobilization of anti-CD34 by plasma process (a) without PEG spacer arm and (b) with PEG space.
(a)
(b)To avoid the steric hindrance of the antibody attached, the concentration of the anti-CD34 was preliminarily optimized and fixed at 20μg/mL. The successful immobilizations of PEG400 and anti-CD34 onto the substrate by cold plasma-induced graft process were directly confirmed by the chemical composition determined by XPS analyses. Figure 2 showed the survey XPS spectra of different coating surfaces, where (a), (b), and (c) correspond to EVA, EVA-PEG, and EVA-PEG-anti-CD34, respectively. It can be seen that EVA before and after PEG grafting all exhibited two peaks corresponding to C1s (285 eV) and O1s (532 eV), while, after being further coated with anti-CD34, an additional peak corresponding to N1s (binding energy, 400 eV) emerged, indicating that anti-CD34 was grafted on the substrates. The surface chemical compositions of different coatings were also analyzed. The oxygen content of EVA was increased from 29.3% to 38.63% after PEG grafting, resulting from the high oxygen content of PEG, whereas, after being further treated with anti-CD34, the oxygen content was slightly decreased (37.12%) and a low nitrogen component (4.25%) was observed on the coating surface.Figure 2
Survey XPS spectra of (a) EVA, (b) EVA-PEG, and (c) EVA-PEG-anti-CD34.The high resolution C1s core level scan spectra of different coatings are shown in Figure 3. Deconvolution of the spectra was carried out using a Gaussian curve fitting technique, and the contributions were assumed due to carbon bonding according to other reports [20]. As shown in Figure 3, the C1s peak of EVA can be divided into three peaks corresponding to C–C, C–O, and C=O at 284.5 eV, 285.9 eV, and 288.8 eV, respectively. After PEG grafting, the peak at 284.5 eV decreased, while the peaks at 285.9 eV and 288.8 eV increased. But, after anti-CD34 treatment, the peak at 285.9 eV further increased and an additional peak corresponding to CO–NH at 288 eV appeared.XPS carbon1s core level scan spectra of (a) EVA, (b) EVA-PEG, and (c) EVA-PEG-anti-CD34.
(a)
(b)
(c)Table1 presented the changes of water contact angles after various modifications. As shown, the original water contact angle of EVA coating was 73.2°. But, after further PEG and antibody immobilization, the contact angle decreased to about 55.1° and 25.9°, respectively. These results confirmed the occurrence of grafting of PEG and antibody on the 316LSS-EVA surface again.Table 1
Water contact angles of different surfaces.
Samples
EVA
EVA-PEG
EVA-PEG-anti-CD34
Contact angle (°)
73.2° ± 2.0
55.1° ± 3.6
25.9° ± 1.9


## 3.2. Binding Capacity of Antibody/Antigen on the EVA Surface

The adsorption of anti-CD34 and the subsequent CD34 recognition capacity of the anti-CD34 on different coatings were further examined. At the concentration of 20μg/mL of anti-CD34, as shown in Figure 4, the amount of the IgG adsorbed on EVA-PEG (295 RUF) was obviously higher than that directly immobilized on the EVA surface (150 RUF). Furthermore, the amount of the recognized CD34 by anti-CD34 immobilized on EVA-PEG increased almost 3-fold than EVA surface. We believed that the enhancement of anti-CD34 attached can be attributable to the PEG effect, and the clear increase of affinity binding comes from a desirable orientation of anti-CD34 molecules on EVA-PEG surface.Comparison of the amount (a) and the bioactivity (b) of the anti-CD34 immobilized by different methods. The unlabeled anti-CD34 and the oxidized anti-CD34 were all immobilized at the optimal conditions. And the CD34 was labeled with rhodamine and incubated with the antibody-immobilized samples at the following conditions: antibody concentration, 100μg/mL, for 2 h at 4°C (P*<0.05 versus control group) (P#<0.05 versus EVA-anti-CD34 group).
(a)
(b)


## 3.3. The Attachment and Growth of HUVECs on the Modified Substrate

Figure5 shows the attachment of HUVECs on 316LSS with different modifications after 3, 6, 9, and 12 h of culture, respectively. As shown, EVA-PEG had a slightly enhanced cell attachment compared with the EVA control at the specific time point. But the cell attachment was significantly improved after anti-CD34 immobilization. After 6 h incubation, compared with the control group (EVA), the number of the attached cells on the EVA-anti-CD34 and EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 were increased around 51% and 110%, respectively. This tendency was strengthened after 12 h of culture. Compared to the EVA-anti-CD34, the endothelial cell attachment on EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 surface, after 3, 6, 9, and 12 h cultivation, increased about 1~2-fold. These results suggested that the cell attachment was significantly stimulated by the presence of anti-CD34 antibody immobilized by this plasma-induced process, especially for that immobilized on the EVA-PEG surface.Figure 5
Comparison of the HUVECs attachment on the 316LSS with different modification methods after 12 h of culture. (P*<0.05 versus EVA group at corresponding time point.) (P#<0.05 versus EVA-anti-CD34 group at corresponding time point.)Figure6 shows the growth curves of HUVECs on 316LSS uncoated and coated with anti-CD34 over a period of 4 days. It was found that the cells significantly grew faster on the anti-CD34-modified coating than those substrates without anti-CD34 in the entire study period. The improvement is more obvious after 2 days. In particular, the EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 surface was more favorable for the cell proliferation than the EVA-anti-CD34 surface.Figure 6
Growth of HUVECs on 316LSS with different modification methods after 1, 2, 3, and 4 days of culture. (P*<0.05 versus control group at corresponding time point.) (P#<0.05 versus EVA-anti-CD34 group at corresponding time point.)The morphology of HUVECs after 12 h of incubation on various surfaces was shown in Figure7. The focal points of the HUVECs can be clearly seen and the cultured cells attached to the surface of the 316LSS before and after modification within 12 h cultivation. As shown, HUVECs on EVA and EVA-PEG surfaces did not spread well, showing a wound-shaped morphology. In contrast, on the anti-CD34-containing 316LSS surfaces, not only the number of the HUVECs was greatly increased but also the morphology of the cells was more elongated than those cultured on EVA and EVA-PEG surfaces. Typical cobblestone-like appearance was seen and cells formed a confluent layer on the EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 surface within the 12 h culture.Morphologies of HUVECs (×40) seeded on 316LSS with different modification methods: (a) EVA, (b) EVA-PEG, (c) EVA-anti-CD34, and (d) EVA-PEG-anti-CD34.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.4.In Vitro Haemocompatibility of the Antibody Coating

Figure8 shows the platelet adhesion on different coatings contacting with PRP for 60 min. It can be observed that no obvious platelet adhesion and aggregation were observed on anti-CD34 immobilized surfaces, whereas a high platelet adhesion and aggregated cell platelets (about 4600/mm2) were clearly observed on the unmodified surface.SEM images of the anti-CD34-coated 316LSS with PRP for 60 min: (a) 316LSS and (b) EVA-PEG-anti-CD34.
(a)
(b)


## 4. Discussion

It is well-accepted that rapid and successful reendothelialization or reliningin vivo can largely prevent the thrombosis of the blood contacting implants, such as vascular grafts, stents, and heart valves [1–3]. Previously, our group and other researches have demonstrated that anti-CD34 immobilization was beneficial for enhanced HUVECs attachment and thus rapid reendothelialization [10]. In this work, we continued these studies to immobilize the anti-CD34 with PEG as spacer arm via cold plasma-induced graft process. With this cold plasma-induced graft method, the anti-CD34 can be attached on the substrate without any solvent and at low temperature. As a spacer arm, the PEG molecule can effectively extend the bioactive site away from the surface and introduce flexibility while reducing steric interferences between the active molecules and increasing the efficiency of the immobilized molecular [21, 22]. So, we hypothesized that, by combining the PEG-induced spacer arm effect and the cold plasma-induced graft process, the anti-CD34 molecule can be immobilized on the substrate with high bioactivity.316LSS, which is commonly used as vascular stents, is distinguished by its excellent mechanic property and cost-effectiveness; however, relatively intrinsic inert property makes it very difficult to graft polymer onto its surface. Hence, an additional surface EVA copolymer coating was firstly spin-coated to serve as an intermediate coating between 316LSS and antibody. According to the XPS spectra, the PEG and the anti-CD34 molecule can be successfully grafted on the 316LSS-EVA by cold plasma-induced graft technique process.The binding of antibody and subsequent antigen recognition and cellular response determine the later antibody-coated grafts efficiency in clinic therapy. As expected, the results from Figure4 revealed that, with the same substrate and same plasma treatment process, the anti-CD34 immobilized on the PEG surface are oriented more favorably for the capture of specific antigen molecules than that directly immobilized on the EVA. Additionally, compared with the EVA-anti-CD34, the EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 also facilitates the ensuing HUVECs cellular capture, attachment, and proliferation. This difference can be attributable to the spacer arm effect. It has been reported that the incorporation of a minimum spacer length, allowing the molecules to stay away from the solid surface and thus avoiding its denaturation, was imperative for bioactive molecule binding on the solid support material [22]. So, in this study, we only selected PEG400 as spacer arm based on the preliminary experiment. These results also confirmed that the anti-CD34 anchored with PEG 400 spacer arm via the cold-plasma grafting process exhibited desirable activity.As a blood-contacting biomedical device, the stent surface should prevent the thrombus formation. In general, when materials contact with blood, proteins are first adsorbed instantaneously onto surfaces and deformed, and then platelets are adsorbed, activated, and aggregated so that platelets play a major role in the initial thrombus formation. Therefore, a study on platelet adhesion is the first step to evaluate the blood compatibility of materials. Figure8 revealed that the platelet adhesion after anti-CD34 grafting was greatly reduced, indicating the improvement of blood compatibility. This good blood compatibility can be attributed to the high hydrophilicity, surface free energy arising from the –OH, C=O, and C–O functionalities. Also, it is clear that the PEG spacer arm can reduce the platelet adhesion. The dominating molecular mechanisms underlying protein resistance of grafted PEG are still not fully understood, but a brush-induced steric repulsion, preventing contact between proteins and the underlying surface, and the hydration shells around the PEG moieties, which energetically suppress the adsorption of proteins, are considered as the two dominating mechanisms [22].In today’s stenting implantation procedures, the thrombosis caused by the delayed endothelialization is one of the great challenges. Anti-CD34 immobilization has been considered as an effective strategy. The anti-CD34 immobilized on the 316LSS in this study exhibited higher antigen capture capacity and thus significantly enhanced the attachment and adhesion of HUVECs. Hence, it can be expected that the EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 could accelerate the reendothelialization and control the late thrombosis risk effectively.


## 5. Conclusion

In this work, anti-CD34 was immobilized onto EVA-coated 316LSS surface by cold plasma-induced grafting process with PEG as spacer arm. Due to the low temperature and less influence on antibody, together with the spacer arm effect of PEG, the antibody immobilized by this process proposed in this study exhibited higher antigen capture capacity and enhanced HUVECs cell attachment and proliferation. Meanwhile, the modified EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 coatings have favorable blood compatibility. It can be concluded that the EVA-PEG-anti-CD34 coating immobilized through this developed cold plasma-induced grafting technique could simultaneously promote the formation of a confluent HUVECs layer and prevent thrombus formation, representing a promising strategy for rapid reendothelialization of intravascular stent devices.



---

*Source: 261281-2014-04-10.xml*