# Antifungal Activity of Coumarin Mammeisin Isolated from Species of theKielmeyera Genre (Family: Clusiaceae or Guttiferae)

Authors: Helcio Cassemiro Marcondes; Tânia T. de Oliveira; Jason G. Taylor; Moisés Hamoy; Arman do Leonel Neto; Vanessa Joia de Mello; Tanus J. Nagem
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Coumarin mammeisin isolated fromKielmeyera elata was evaluated for its toxicity and antifungal activities. The toxicity of mammeisin was investigated by utilizing the Artemia salina methodology to determine its LD50 value. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of fungi Candida sp. was assessed for mammeisin, presenting equivalent activity to ketoconazole but displaying better results than fluconazole.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The current pharmacotherapy used against human fungal diseases is based on azole compounds. Unfortunately, the emergence of microorganisms resistant to azole antifungals is increasing in number and patients at risk of acquiring fungal infections have created new challenges. The demand for drugs of plant origin has led to a renewed interest in pharmaceutical coumarins, chromones, and xanthones, given the fact that these substances show potent pharmacological activities and low toxicity to mammals [1].Amongst the many pharmacological functions of coumarins a few stand out, such as scoparone (6,7-dimethoxy-coumarin), isolated from the Chinese plantArtemisia scoparia Waldst. Osthole coumarin (a C-prenylated coumarin) inhibited platelet aggregation and was able to induce relaxation of the smooth muscles of the heart, possibly due to inhibition of the enzyme cAMP- and cGMP-phosphodiesterase and calcium influx [2]. Coumarins such as calanolides A and B (pyranocoumarins) exhibited anti-HIV activity by impeding thein vitro replication of HIV-1, probably by inhibiting the enzymatic activity of DNA polymerase-dependent DNA and DNA-dependent RNA polymerase present in viruses [3].The genusKielmeyera belongs to the family Clusiaceae (Guttiferae), part of the subfamily Kielmeyeroidae, which is endemic in South America, and most species are exclusively native of the Brazilian flora. Coumarins isolated fromKielmeyera elata, which are pertinent to this report, include mammeisin (Figure 1). Mammeisin can essentially be classified as a C-prenylated coumarin and was isolated from the stem ofKielmeyera elata by our group [4]. Mammeisin has also been more recently identified inMammea americana L. seeds and has been evaluated for its cytotoxic and antioxidant properties [5].Figure 1
Chemical structure of mammeisin.Until now, its antifungal activities had not been investigated; thus, we isolated the natural product from the stem ofKielmeyera elata in order to evaluate its potential antifungal properties.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Isolation and Characterization of Natural Product Mammeisin

Mammeisin was isolated from the stems ofKielmeyera elata as described by our group [4] and its structure confirmed by spectroscopic analysis. Pale yellow prisms, mp 102–104°C; δ
H (300 MHz, CDCl3): 0.89 (6H, d,J 6.9), 1.76 (3H, s), 1.89 (3H, s), 2.19 (1H, sept,J 6.6), 2.85 (2H, d,J 6.9), 3.57 (2H, d,J 7.2), 5.26 (1H, t,J 7.2), 5.96 (1H, s), 7.39–7.41 (2H, m), 7.52–7.54 (3H, m), 9.93 (1H, s), 11.04 (1H, s); δ
C (75 MHz, CDCl3): 207.4, 163.5, 159.8, 159.5, 156.9, 154.7, 137.5, 135.7, 130.0, 129.4, 127.7, 120.9, 112.9, 108.2, 107.5, 101.1, 53.9, 29.9, 26.1, 24.9, 22.9, 21.9, 18.2, 14.4.


### 2.2. Evaluation of Biological Activities

#### 2.2.1. Antifungal Activity

The evaluation used the antifungal method for determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), according to the broth microdilution technique recommended by the CLSI document M27-A2. The methodology employed for testing antifungal activity was divided into four stages: preparation of the dilutions from all compounds tested, preparation of dilutions of the antifungal agents (in this case, ketoconazole and fluconazole), preparation of inocula with species ofCandida (C. albicans,C. tropicalis,C. parapsilosis,C. krusei), and finally plating. The dilutions for all compounds tested consisted of solubilizing, 12.0 mg in 6.0 mL of DMSO, resulting in a solution with 2000 μg/mL and then dilutions were made successively with the culture medium RPMI (Roswell Park Memorial Institute) to yield ten concentrations 512.0, 256.0, 128.0, 64.0, 32.0, 16.0, 8.0, 4.0, 2.0, and 1.0 μg/mL (extract + RPMI + DMSO). As for the antifungal compounds fluconazole and ketoconazole, 5.0 mg was diluted in 5.0 mL DMSO resulting in two solutions with a concentration of 1000 μg/mL; then the solutions were diluted with culture medium (RPMI) to give dilutions of fluconazole 64.0 μg/mL, 32.0 μg/mL, 16.0 μg/mL, 8.0 μg/mL, 4.0 μg/mL, 2.0 μg/mL, 1.0 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 0.25 μg/mL, and 0.125 μg/mL and for ketoconazole 32.0 μg/mL, 16.0 μg/mL, 8.0 μg/mL, 4.0 μg/mL, 2.0 μg/mL, 1.0 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 0.25 μg/mL, 0.125 μg/mL, and 0.0625 μg/mL.The plates were incubated at 28°C and readings were taken after 48 hours to analyse the fungal growth at different courmarin concentrations against a positive control. MICs were obtained by visual reading and expressed inμg/mL.


#### 2.2.2. Toxicity Evaluation:Artemia salina

In order to obtainArtemia salina, the microcrustacean eggs were placed in an aquarium with saline solution (sea salt of artificial Red Sea) and allowed to hatch at a concentration of 38.0 g/L under oxygenation and light radiation for 48 h. Next, 40.0 mg of dry extract was diluted in 4.0 mL of DMSO and from this solution aliquots of 5, 50, 250, and 500 μL were withdrawn, which were then transferred to test tubes to allow 4 treatments for each compound to be tested in three replicates. Subsequently, the solvent was evaporated, and 5.0 mL (per well) of saline was added resulting in concentrations of 10, 100, 500, and 1000 μg/mL (T10, T100, T500, and T1000, each treatment being represented with numbers from 1 to 8). The controls used were lapachol prepared by the same procedure to provide 4 treatments with three replicates (13, 14, 15, and 16) and one treatment with saline and 4 repeats (white 17). In each test tube ten larvae ofA. salina of thenauplii type were placed, which remained in solution for 24 hours and were finally analyzed for mortality rate to determine the toxicity of compounds by calculating the LD50 (probit method).


#### 2.2.3. Statistical Analysis

The results presented in this study are the average of three replicates (n
=
3) ± standard deviation. The data obtained from theArtemia salina experiments were treated to statistical analysis using the SAEG 9.1 software and by applying the ANOVA variance, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (P
<
0.05). Graphics displaying linear regression of the stock solution of DPPH and EC50 calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel 2007 program.


## 2.1. Isolation and Characterization of Natural Product Mammeisin

Mammeisin was isolated from the stems ofKielmeyera elata as described by our group [4] and its structure confirmed by spectroscopic analysis. Pale yellow prisms, mp 102–104°C; δ
H (300 MHz, CDCl3): 0.89 (6H, d,J 6.9), 1.76 (3H, s), 1.89 (3H, s), 2.19 (1H, sept,J 6.6), 2.85 (2H, d,J 6.9), 3.57 (2H, d,J 7.2), 5.26 (1H, t,J 7.2), 5.96 (1H, s), 7.39–7.41 (2H, m), 7.52–7.54 (3H, m), 9.93 (1H, s), 11.04 (1H, s); δ
C (75 MHz, CDCl3): 207.4, 163.5, 159.8, 159.5, 156.9, 154.7, 137.5, 135.7, 130.0, 129.4, 127.7, 120.9, 112.9, 108.2, 107.5, 101.1, 53.9, 29.9, 26.1, 24.9, 22.9, 21.9, 18.2, 14.4.


## 2.2. Evaluation of Biological Activities

### 2.2.1. Antifungal Activity

The evaluation used the antifungal method for determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), according to the broth microdilution technique recommended by the CLSI document M27-A2. The methodology employed for testing antifungal activity was divided into four stages: preparation of the dilutions from all compounds tested, preparation of dilutions of the antifungal agents (in this case, ketoconazole and fluconazole), preparation of inocula with species ofCandida (C. albicans,C. tropicalis,C. parapsilosis,C. krusei), and finally plating. The dilutions for all compounds tested consisted of solubilizing, 12.0 mg in 6.0 mL of DMSO, resulting in a solution with 2000 μg/mL and then dilutions were made successively with the culture medium RPMI (Roswell Park Memorial Institute) to yield ten concentrations 512.0, 256.0, 128.0, 64.0, 32.0, 16.0, 8.0, 4.0, 2.0, and 1.0 μg/mL (extract + RPMI + DMSO). As for the antifungal compounds fluconazole and ketoconazole, 5.0 mg was diluted in 5.0 mL DMSO resulting in two solutions with a concentration of 1000 μg/mL; then the solutions were diluted with culture medium (RPMI) to give dilutions of fluconazole 64.0 μg/mL, 32.0 μg/mL, 16.0 μg/mL, 8.0 μg/mL, 4.0 μg/mL, 2.0 μg/mL, 1.0 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 0.25 μg/mL, and 0.125 μg/mL and for ketoconazole 32.0 μg/mL, 16.0 μg/mL, 8.0 μg/mL, 4.0 μg/mL, 2.0 μg/mL, 1.0 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 0.25 μg/mL, 0.125 μg/mL, and 0.0625 μg/mL.The plates were incubated at 28°C and readings were taken after 48 hours to analyse the fungal growth at different courmarin concentrations against a positive control. MICs were obtained by visual reading and expressed inμg/mL.


### 2.2.2. Toxicity Evaluation:Artemia salina

In order to obtainArtemia salina, the microcrustacean eggs were placed in an aquarium with saline solution (sea salt of artificial Red Sea) and allowed to hatch at a concentration of 38.0 g/L under oxygenation and light radiation for 48 h. Next, 40.0 mg of dry extract was diluted in 4.0 mL of DMSO and from this solution aliquots of 5, 50, 250, and 500 μL were withdrawn, which were then transferred to test tubes to allow 4 treatments for each compound to be tested in three replicates. Subsequently, the solvent was evaporated, and 5.0 mL (per well) of saline was added resulting in concentrations of 10, 100, 500, and 1000 μg/mL (T10, T100, T500, and T1000, each treatment being represented with numbers from 1 to 8). The controls used were lapachol prepared by the same procedure to provide 4 treatments with three replicates (13, 14, 15, and 16) and one treatment with saline and 4 repeats (white 17). In each test tube ten larvae ofA. salina of thenauplii type were placed, which remained in solution for 24 hours and were finally analyzed for mortality rate to determine the toxicity of compounds by calculating the LD50 (probit method).


### 2.2.3. Statistical Analysis

The results presented in this study are the average of three replicates (n
=
3) ± standard deviation. The data obtained from theArtemia salina experiments were treated to statistical analysis using the SAEG 9.1 software and by applying the ANOVA variance, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (P
<
0.05). Graphics displaying linear regression of the stock solution of DPPH and EC50 calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel 2007 program.


## 2.2.1. Antifungal Activity

The evaluation used the antifungal method for determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), according to the broth microdilution technique recommended by the CLSI document M27-A2. The methodology employed for testing antifungal activity was divided into four stages: preparation of the dilutions from all compounds tested, preparation of dilutions of the antifungal agents (in this case, ketoconazole and fluconazole), preparation of inocula with species ofCandida (C. albicans,C. tropicalis,C. parapsilosis,C. krusei), and finally plating. The dilutions for all compounds tested consisted of solubilizing, 12.0 mg in 6.0 mL of DMSO, resulting in a solution with 2000 μg/mL and then dilutions were made successively with the culture medium RPMI (Roswell Park Memorial Institute) to yield ten concentrations 512.0, 256.0, 128.0, 64.0, 32.0, 16.0, 8.0, 4.0, 2.0, and 1.0 μg/mL (extract + RPMI + DMSO). As for the antifungal compounds fluconazole and ketoconazole, 5.0 mg was diluted in 5.0 mL DMSO resulting in two solutions with a concentration of 1000 μg/mL; then the solutions were diluted with culture medium (RPMI) to give dilutions of fluconazole 64.0 μg/mL, 32.0 μg/mL, 16.0 μg/mL, 8.0 μg/mL, 4.0 μg/mL, 2.0 μg/mL, 1.0 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 0.25 μg/mL, and 0.125 μg/mL and for ketoconazole 32.0 μg/mL, 16.0 μg/mL, 8.0 μg/mL, 4.0 μg/mL, 2.0 μg/mL, 1.0 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 0.25 μg/mL, 0.125 μg/mL, and 0.0625 μg/mL.The plates were incubated at 28°C and readings were taken after 48 hours to analyse the fungal growth at different courmarin concentrations against a positive control. MICs were obtained by visual reading and expressed inμg/mL.


## 2.2.2. Toxicity Evaluation:Artemia salina

In order to obtainArtemia salina, the microcrustacean eggs were placed in an aquarium with saline solution (sea salt of artificial Red Sea) and allowed to hatch at a concentration of 38.0 g/L under oxygenation and light radiation for 48 h. Next, 40.0 mg of dry extract was diluted in 4.0 mL of DMSO and from this solution aliquots of 5, 50, 250, and 500 μL were withdrawn, which were then transferred to test tubes to allow 4 treatments for each compound to be tested in three replicates. Subsequently, the solvent was evaporated, and 5.0 mL (per well) of saline was added resulting in concentrations of 10, 100, 500, and 1000 μg/mL (T10, T100, T500, and T1000, each treatment being represented with numbers from 1 to 8). The controls used were lapachol prepared by the same procedure to provide 4 treatments with three replicates (13, 14, 15, and 16) and one treatment with saline and 4 repeats (white 17). In each test tube ten larvae ofA. salina of thenauplii type were placed, which remained in solution for 24 hours and were finally analyzed for mortality rate to determine the toxicity of compounds by calculating the LD50 (probit method).


## 2.2.3. Statistical Analysis

The results presented in this study are the average of three replicates (n
=
3) ± standard deviation. The data obtained from theArtemia salina experiments were treated to statistical analysis using the SAEG 9.1 software and by applying the ANOVA variance, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (P
<
0.05). Graphics displaying linear regression of the stock solution of DPPH and EC50 calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel 2007 program.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Toxicity Evaluation:Artemia salina

The linear regression data (probit) indicated LD50 values for the lethal dose at 50% of thenauplii population under study showed that mammeisin at the concentrations tested was 100% lethal and therefore very toxic. Toxicity toA. saline shows good correlation with antitumor and insecticide activity [6], for substances when the LD50 is <103 μg/mL. In the statistical analysis by Tukey’s test (P
<
0.05), the high toxicity of mammeisin was confirmed and evidenced by the fact that toxicity at all concentrations was equivalent to the highest concentration tested for lapachol.


### 3.2. Antifungal Activity

Given that mammeisin demonstrated high toxicity, we proceeded to perform an antifungal assay. For the initial dilution of mammeisin, 12.0 mg was diluted in to 6.0 mL of DMSO, resulting in a concentration of 2000μg/mL. Next, this solution was successively diluted in to the culture medium, RPMI (Roswell Park Memorial Institute), to provide final dilutions of 512.0, 256.0, 128.0, 64.0, 32.0, 16.0, 8.0, 4.0, 2.0, and 1.0 μg/mL. Pure RPMI is also used as a negative control.In the case of the antifungal standards, 5.0 mg of either fluconazole or ketoconazole is diluted in to 5.0 mL of DMSO to give an initial solution concentration of 1000μg/mL, and the respective solutions are diluted in culture medium RPMI, to afford dilutions of either fluconazole or ketoconazole at the following final concentrations: 64.0 μg/mL, 32.0 μg/mL, 16.0 μg/mL, 8.0 μg/mL, 4.0 μg/mL, 2.0 μg/mL, 1.0 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 0.25 μg/mL, 0.125 μg/mL, and 0.0625 μg/mL (Figure 2).Figure 2
Antifungal experiment: concentrations 512-1 are given in units ofμg/mL. Photo above corresponds to experiment with ketoconazole as positive control and photo below shows experiment carried out with fluconazole as positive control.The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for mammeisin was 512μg/mL for all types ofCandida employed in this experiment. In comparison to the positive control, it was noted that fluconazole was not effective against theCandida tropicalis, since there was growth at all concentrations evaluated whereas mammeisin demonstrated antifungal activity againstCandida tropicalis. Moreover, mammeisin was almost equally active as positive control ketoconazole for the same types ofCandida and presented similar MIC. The results are outlined in Table 1.Table 1
Summary of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for mammeisin and two antifungal agents.
(a)
Candida
ATCC
Mammeisin (CIM)
Ketoconazole (CIM)
Fluconazole (CIM)
C. albicans
2209
512μg/mL
2μg/mL
8μg/mL
C. tropicalis
750
512μg/mL
512μg/mL
—
C. parapsilosis
2209
512μg/mL
2μg/mL
8μg/mL
C. krusei
6258
512μg/mL
2μg/mL
64μg/mL
(b)
—
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
—
C. albicans
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
A
C. tropicalis
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
B
C. parapsilosis
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
C
C. krusei
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
D
C. albicans
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
E
C. tropicalis
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
F
C. parapsilosis
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
G
C. krusei
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
H
—
C−
512
256
128
64
32
16
8
4
2
1
C+
—
*Mammeisin.
∗∗Antifungal standard (ketoconazole/fluconazole).
C+: positive control.
C−: negative control.


## 3.1. Toxicity Evaluation:Artemia salina

The linear regression data (probit) indicated LD50 values for the lethal dose at 50% of thenauplii population under study showed that mammeisin at the concentrations tested was 100% lethal and therefore very toxic. Toxicity toA. saline shows good correlation with antitumor and insecticide activity [6], for substances when the LD50 is <103 μg/mL. In the statistical analysis by Tukey’s test (P
<
0.05), the high toxicity of mammeisin was confirmed and evidenced by the fact that toxicity at all concentrations was equivalent to the highest concentration tested for lapachol.


## 3.2. Antifungal Activity

Given that mammeisin demonstrated high toxicity, we proceeded to perform an antifungal assay. For the initial dilution of mammeisin, 12.0 mg was diluted in to 6.0 mL of DMSO, resulting in a concentration of 2000μg/mL. Next, this solution was successively diluted in to the culture medium, RPMI (Roswell Park Memorial Institute), to provide final dilutions of 512.0, 256.0, 128.0, 64.0, 32.0, 16.0, 8.0, 4.0, 2.0, and 1.0 μg/mL. Pure RPMI is also used as a negative control.In the case of the antifungal standards, 5.0 mg of either fluconazole or ketoconazole is diluted in to 5.0 mL of DMSO to give an initial solution concentration of 1000μg/mL, and the respective solutions are diluted in culture medium RPMI, to afford dilutions of either fluconazole or ketoconazole at the following final concentrations: 64.0 μg/mL, 32.0 μg/mL, 16.0 μg/mL, 8.0 μg/mL, 4.0 μg/mL, 2.0 μg/mL, 1.0 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 0.25 μg/mL, 0.125 μg/mL, and 0.0625 μg/mL (Figure 2).Figure 2
Antifungal experiment: concentrations 512-1 are given in units ofμg/mL. Photo above corresponds to experiment with ketoconazole as positive control and photo below shows experiment carried out with fluconazole as positive control.The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for mammeisin was 512μg/mL for all types ofCandida employed in this experiment. In comparison to the positive control, it was noted that fluconazole was not effective against theCandida tropicalis, since there was growth at all concentrations evaluated whereas mammeisin demonstrated antifungal activity againstCandida tropicalis. Moreover, mammeisin was almost equally active as positive control ketoconazole for the same types ofCandida and presented similar MIC. The results are outlined in Table 1.Table 1
Summary of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for mammeisin and two antifungal agents.
(a)
Candida
ATCC
Mammeisin (CIM)
Ketoconazole (CIM)
Fluconazole (CIM)
C. albicans
2209
512μg/mL
2μg/mL
8μg/mL
C. tropicalis
750
512μg/mL
512μg/mL
—
C. parapsilosis
2209
512μg/mL
2μg/mL
8μg/mL
C. krusei
6258
512μg/mL
2μg/mL
64μg/mL
(b)
—
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
—
C. albicans
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
A
C. tropicalis
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
B
C. parapsilosis
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
C
C. krusei
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
D
C. albicans
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
E
C. tropicalis
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
F
C. parapsilosis
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
G
C. krusei
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
∗∗
H
—
C−
512
256
128
64
32
16
8
4
2
1
C+
—
*Mammeisin.
∗∗Antifungal standard (ketoconazole/fluconazole).
C+: positive control.
C−: negative control.


## 4. Conclusions

To conclude, we report the antifungal activities of courmain mammeisin, against 4 different types ofCandida. Mammeisin showed better MIC values forCandida tropicalis when compared to positive control fluconazole.



---

*Source: 241243-2015-03-12.xml*