# Improvements in Drill-Core Headspace Gas Analysis for Samples from Microbially Active Depths

Authors: Kazuya Miyakawa; Fumiaki Okumura
Journal: Geofluids
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

The IsoJar™ container is widely used in headspace gas analysis for gases adsorbed on cuttings or bore cores from oil and gas fields. However, large variations in the carbon isotopic ratios of CH4 and CO2 are often reported, especially for data obtained from depths of <1000 m. The IsoJar™ method leaves air in the headspace that allows microbial oxidation of CH4 to CO2, meaning that isotopic fractionation occurs during storage. This study employed the IsoJar™ method to investigate the causes of differences in δ13C data reported by previous studies in the Horonobe area of Japan. It was found that after 80 d storage, δ13CCO2 values decreased by ~2‰, while δ13CCH4 values increased by >30‰, whereas samples analyzed within a week of collection showed no such fluctuations. The conventional amount of microbial suppressant (~0.5 ml of 10% benzalkonium chloride (BKC) solution) is insufficient to suppress microbial activity if groundwater is used as filling water. The significant variations in carbon isotopic compositions previously reported were caused by microbial methane oxidation after sampling and contamination by groundwater from different depths. To avoid these problems, we recommend the following: (1) if long-term sample storage is necessary, >10 ml of 10% BKC solution should be added or >0.3% BKC concentration is required to suppress microbial activity; (2) analyses should be performed within one week of sampling; and (3) for CO2 analyses, it is important that samples are not contaminated by groundwater from different depths.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Investigation of the origin of deep hydrocarbons is an important aspect of resource exploration and may lead to an improved understanding of geological environments. In this investigation, gases adsorbed on rock fragments or bore cores were studied by headspace gas analysis (e.g., [1–5]), which provides information on the generation and migration of light hydrocarbons and gases. The IsoJar™ (Isotech Laboratories and Humble Instruments, USA) container, which is widely used in such analyses (e.g., [6, 7]) comprises a plastic container of ~600 ml volume with an aluminum screw cap on which there is a rubber septum through which headspace gas can be taken by syringe. The analysis procedure (e.g., [8]) normally involves storage of wet cuttings or cores in the jar with water and an air headspace for several days or weeks, the addition of a microbicide such as benzalkonium chloride (BKC) to minimize bacterial activity, the partitioning of gas into the headspace during storage, and analysis of these gases (e.g., [9–11]). The use of distilled or tap water avoids contamination from dissolved gases. The δ13CCH4 values of gases from depths of <1000 m, in the biogenic region, are usually in the range of –70‰ to −60‰, with isotopic compositions becoming heavier as depth increases towards the thermogenic region (e.g., [12, 13]). Large variations in carbon isotopic ratios in CH4 and CO2 are often reported for depths of <1000 m, with δ13CCH4 values sometimes reaching −20‰ (e.g., [14–17]). These variations are associated with the effects of microbial activity on methane production or oxidation in underground environments [18]. There are a number of factors that control the rate of methanogenesis [19], including temperature [20], groundwater salinity [21], pH [22], and pore space [23]. Peak microbial activity occurs at 35–45°C, which corresponds to depths of <1000 m [19, 24]. At greater depths, microbial action decreases as thermogenic production increases with the onset of catagenesis (subsequent to diagenesis at shallower depths [8]). More importantly, pore diameters of at least 1 μm are necessary for in situ methanogenesis, as microbes are in the 1–10 μm size range [25], which suggests that active methane production occurs at depths of <1500 m [24]. At shallow depths (less than several meters) below the ocean floor, where the concentration of dissolved gas is relatively low, considerable care was taken to avoid contamination and microbial activity (e.g., [26]). Hachikubo et al. [27] adjusted the concentration of BKC in samples to ~2.5% using 25 ml vials to obtain precise depth profiles of gases relative to hydrates. While the concentration and/or amount of microbicide normally added to IsoJar™ vessels are often omitted in reports, it is considered that the final concentration in IsoJar™ containers should be of the order of 0.01%, which is two orders of magnitude less than that reported by Hachikubo et al. [27]. It is speculated that another possible cause of variations in carbon isotopic composition may be microbial activity in the headspace after sampling, as the amount of microbicide commonly used with samples from microbially active depths might be insufficient to suppress microbial activity.In a previous study, gas samples from two boreholes (PB-V01 and SAB-1, both ~500 m deep) in the Horonobe area, Hokkaido, were processed using IsoJar™ containers [14]. In that study, cores were stored in IsoJar™ containers with water and a few drops of BKC solution [14] for up to three months before headspace analysis. Because sampling date of cores and analysis date of gases, which are necessary for the calculation of the storage period, have not been presented in Funaki et al. [14], these unpublished information are summarized in Tables S1a and S1b. Concentration of the BKC solution and amounts of cores and water also have not been reported in Funaki et al. [14]. In the conventional way of using IsoJar™ headspace gas analysis, it is considered that the concentration of BKC solution is lower than 10%, in which case concentrations of BKC in jars are in order of 0.01%. In the construction of the Horonobe Underground Research Laboratory (URL), including two boreholes (PB-V01 and SAB-1), water was collected from groundwater at ~50 m depth, and this was used by Funaki et al. [14] as filling water for the IsoJar™ containers. Gases dissolved in deep groundwater from the URL were also analyzed, using an evacuated-vial (EV) method [28]. Measured δ13C values for CH4 and CO2 from both sets of analyses are plotted against each other in Figure 1. Large variations in δ13CCH4 values from the IsoJar™ measurements (Figure 1) were attributed to methane-oxidizing bacterial activity using sulfate ions in the deep underground environment or to isotopic fractionation during gas migration through fractures [14]. However, these possible causes are considered unlikely because (a) geochemical studies in the Horonobe area indicate that reducing conditions are maintained deep underground and sulfate ions are either absent or present at very low concentrations [29–32]; (b) studies of iodine enrichment [33] indicates that any traces of methane oxidation by sulfate in pore waters of sediments would have been erased during upward fluid flow due to compaction during burial; and (c) there is no evidence in the study area of isotopic fractionation in gases during migration [34, 35]. The δ13CCH4 and δ13CCO2 values obtained by the EV method (Figure 1) show little scatter plotting in the carbonate reduction field.Figure 1
Plot ofδ13CCH4 vs. δ13CCO2 in coexisting gases, showing fields relating to different gas sources and isotopic shifts resulting from production and oxidation (adapted from [50]). The data are from Funaki et al. [14] and Miyakawa et al. [28].Differences between these data sets could be attributed to factors such as aerobic microbial oxidation of methane in the containers after sampling and/or using groundwater from the different depths of core samples. Possible causes were investigated in the present study to improve the methodology of headspace gas analysis using IsoJar™. Gases from the Wakkanai Formation in the Horonobe area were sampled using the methods of Funaki et al. [14] and Miyakawa et al. [28]. The effects of the sampling method (storage period, water type, and additives) on carbon isotopic ratios in CH4 and CO2 were investigated, and improvements in headspace gas analysis techniques are suggested.


## 2. Geological Setting

The Horonobe area is located in northwestern Hokkaido, in a Neogene–Quaternary sedimentary basin (Figure2). Since August 2006, the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) has been excavating the URL for a research associated with the development of technologies related to the geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste. Geologically, the URL area comprises marine sediments of the Wakkanai Formation (Neogene siliceous mudstone containing opal-CT) and Koetoi Formation (Neogene–Quaternary diatomaceous mudstone containing opal-A). Burial and subsidence of these formations occurred throughout the Neogene and Quaternary, when they underwent early diagenetic thermal alteration at temperatures of <60°C [36]. The URL and surrounding geology are depicted in Figure 3. The high-pressure boreholes have steel casings, with valves allowing the sampling of groundwater from multiple depths or zones [37]. The δD vs. δ18O plots for groundwater from the Wakkanai and Koetoi Formations indicate that it is a mixture of local meteoric water and altered seawater [38, 39]. Methanogenic and methane-oxidizing microbial communities have played an important role in these formations [40–42], where secondary microbial gas with 13C-enriched isotopic values (δ13CCH4, −74‰ to −28‰; δ13CCO2, −7‰ to +31‰) formed through CO2 reduction after uplift of the area [28].Figure 2
Maps showing the location of the Horonobe URL site and the boreholes: (a) location map and (b) geological map (after [51]). The plate boundaries and the direction of plate movement in (a) are from Wei and Seno [52].Figure 3
Layout of the Horonobe URL, locations of boreholes, and surrounding geology. Red color-labelled “borehole 350-Fz-01” indicates core sampling depths (TableS2).


## 3. Sampling and Analytical Methods

### 3.1. IsoJar™ Samples

#### 3.1.1. Effect of Storage Period

Core samples including in situ pore water (300–400 g), crushed to pieces roughly 30–50 mm in diameter, were placed in IsoJar™ containers with 250–300 g of “filling” water. HgCl2-saturated or 10% BKC aqueous solution (10 drops (~0.5 ml) of either) was added to suppress microbial activity, and the jars were sealed with an air headspace. Final concentrations of both microbicides in the jars were about 0.01%–0.02%. The jars were kept in the dark at room temperature for 5–92 d before analysis. Details of each experiment are summarized in Table 1 and Table S2.Table 1
Information on IsoJar™ samples and analytical results of headspace gases.
Sample no.
Amount of core sample (g)
Amount of water (g)
Depth of groundwater
Type of additive
Storage period (days)
CO2 (%)
O2 (%)
N2 (%)
CH4 (%)
δ13CCH4(‰ VPDB)
δ13CCO2(‰ VPDB)
IJ1
220
350
350 m
None
67
6.5
6.9
83
0.030
−45.4
+13.6
IJ2
369
262
350 m
None
41
8.9
2.8
79
6.7
−35.5
+13.2
IJ3
342
304
350 m
None
79
3.1
11.0
80
2.8
−30.8
+13.2
IJ4
360
269
50 m
None
17
0.63
14.6
80
2.2
−49.3
+5.0
IJ5
239
333
50 m
None
68
2.3
9.4
86
0.014
−51.4
+2.1
IJ6
411
247
50 m
None
42
6.7
0.01
79
12.5
−42.5
+3.5
IJ7
339
277
50 m
None
79
2.5
5.4
80
9.6
−36.8
−1.0
IJ8
338
279
50 m
None
79
0.36
18.1
79
0.45
−22.3
−1.4
IJ9
302
274
350 m
HgCl2
19
3.9
7.9
80
5.8
−57.7
+15.2
IJ10
263
328
350 m
HgCl2
67
5.0
2.4
86
4.8
−40.7
+14.5
IJ11
380
274
350 m
HgCl2
41
4.7
5.1
76
12.3
−48.8
+15.7
IJ12
383
241
350 m
HgCl2
92
1.49
14.1
80
0.88
−26.8
+12.9
IJ13
358
262
50 m
HgCl2
19
2.6
8.1
75
11.9
−55.3
+6.0
IJ14
225
349
50 m
HgCl2
68
0.52
16.8
81
0.059
+4.7
+2.7
IJ15
420
252
50 m
HgCl2
42
4.0
3.6
83
7.5
−45.0
+4.7
IJ16
338
284
50 m
HgCl2
79
0.57
14.2
80
2.0
−38.2
+2.5
IJ17
341
229
350 m
BKC
19
6.2
6.9
82
1.89
−50.3
+14.5
IJ18
264
281
350 m
BKC
67
8.9
2.2
80
5.2
−44.6
+13.5
IJ19
388
253
350 m
BKC
41
7.4
0.02
76
15.5
−48.6
+14.3
IJ20
333
302
350 m
BKC
79
5.0
4.4
79
7.6
−46.2
+14.4
IJ21
320
290
50 m
BKC
19
4.7
1.82
85
5.5
−46.2
+3.7
IJ22
345
256
50 m
BKC
68
3.7
8.2
84
2.3
−26.7
+2.8
IJ23
392
258
50 m
BKC
42
4.4
3.2
80
10.2
−42.7
+4.3
IJ24
368
291
50 m
BKC
79
2.2
4.1
80
10.2
−41.8
+2.2
IJ25
360
266
50 m
BKC
79
2.6
3.0
79
13.4
−43.5
+3.2
IJ26
388
242
350 m
None
5
2.3
14.2
79
3.6
−55.4
+14.5
IJ27
379
272
350 m
None
5
3.0
11.6
78
6.1
−53.8
+14.8
IJ28
333
316
350 m
None
5
2.1
12.7
80
3.5
−55.5
+15.1The cores were obtained immediately after drilling of borehole 350-Fz-01 from the bottom of the east shaft (Figure3). Although distilled or tap water is usually used in the IsoJar™ method, groundwater from depths of 53.5–64.5 m and 350 m in borehole 13-350-C01 (drilled in the 350 m gallery; Figure 3) was used to match the 50 m groundwater used by Funaki et al. [14]. The priority in this study was to evaluate the effects of sampling method on the carbon isotopic ratios of CH4 and CO2, rather than to obtain accurate in situ values. A large portion of CH4 dissolved in groundwater around the URL had already escaped due to the pressure decrease associated with excavation, so it was expected that only small amounts of gas would remain in cores. Groundwater, rather than tap water, was used to compensate for this (with water from borehole 13-350-C01 being used because water was not available from borehole 350-Fz-01). Core samples IJ1–IJ25 were from depths of 384–416 m (Table S2). Core samples IJ26–IJ28 were from a depth of 470 m (Table S2) and kept in vacuum storage for one month after drilling. At these depths, the C isotopic ratios for CH4 and CO2 had similar values to those from 350 m depth [28].


#### 3.1.2. Effect of Additives

The effective amount of additives was investigated as follows. IsoJar™ samples were prepared as described in Section3.1.1, with up to 20 ml of BKC and HgCl2 solutions per jar (Table 2 and Table S3). All core samples were from a depth of 480 m in 350-Fz-01. Fresh cores taken immediately after drilling were not available for analysis, and the samples used in this study had been kept in vacuum storage for about six months. Groundwater from borehole 13-350-C01 was used as filling water. Headspace gas compositions were determined after storage in IsoJar™ for one month.Table 2
Information on IsoJar™ samples and analytical results of headspace gases for Section3.1.2.
Sample no.
Amount of core sample (g)
Amount of water (g)
Type of additive
Amount of additive (ml)
Concentration of additives (wt%)
Storage period (days)
CO2 (%)
O2 (%)
N2 (%)
CH4 (%)
δ13CCH4(‰ VPDB)
δ13CCO2(‰ VPDB)
IJ29
311
310
None
0
0
27
12.8
1.0
86
0.039
−48.3
+14.2
IJ30
299
282
None
0
0
27
13.7
1.0
85
0.029
−74.6
+15.2
IJ31
284
324
BKC
1
0.03
27
12.5
1.0
86
0.036
−74.2
+14.0
IJ32
323
297
BKC
1
0.03
27
12.4
1.0
87
0.040
−84.1
+13.8
IJ33
332
312
BKC
3
0.10
27
11.6
4.2
84
0.053
−88.5
+13.9
IJ34
352
279
BKC
3
0.11
28
13.1
2.0
85
0.046
−75.7
+13.0
IJ35
368
290
BKC
6
0.20
28
10.2
4.1
86
0.067
−58.1
+12.9
IJ36
382
278
BKC
6
0.21
28
10.2
2.9
87
0.067
−90.4
+12.5
IJ37
309
299
BKC
10
0.32
28
12.8
7.3
80
0.054
−56.2
+14.8
IJ38
310
280
BKC
10
0.34
28
12.8
6.6
80
0.052
−57.9
+14.6
IJ39
340
285
BKC
20
0.66
29
10.9
6.2
83
0.068
−54.5
+13.6
IJ40
336
309
BKC
20
0.61
29
9.0
3.7
87
0.105
−57.9
+13.4
IJ41
272
319
HgCl2
1
0.02
29
8.7
10.9
80
0.042
−59.0
+15.0
IJ42
323
296
HgCl2
1
0.02
29
10.2
9.9
80
0.041
−63.1
+14.9
IJ43
348
284
HgCl2
5
0.13
29
10.8
9.2
80
0.037
−65.4
+15.0
IJ44
319
314
HgCl2
5
0.12
29
11.0
9.0
80
0.044
−60.1
+14.8
IJ45
293
322
HgCl2
10
0.22
30
12.7
8.4
79
0.043
−62.6
+15.2
IJ46
362
293
HgCl2
10
0.24
30
13.3
6.9
80
0.046
−61.9
+15.3
IJ47
285
308
HgCl2
20
0.45
30
21
7.0
72
0.033
−62.2
+16.6
IJ48
362
295
HgCl2
20
0.47
30
23
6.0
71
0.045
−62.1
+16.1


### 3.2. EV Samples

The EV sampling procedure involved the preliminary evacuation of septum-topped 50 ml glass vials containing ~1 ml phosphoric acid (85 wt%). Acidification removed any inorganic carbon as CO2, with the CO2 concentration being measured as total inorganic carbon (TIC). Groundwater (15–30 ml, from borehole 09-V250-M02#1 drilled from the 250 m gallery; Figure 3) was introduced by a syringe through a 0.22 μm membrane filter to remove microsized carbonate grains and microbes. Samples were stored in the dark at room temperature for 5–98 d, after which ultrapure He was added by a syringe to equalize headspace gas and atmospheric pressures. The sample was left to stand overnight for gas exchange equilibrium to be established between the headspace and dissolved gases. The composition of the headspace gas was determined by GC, with the concentration of dissolved gas being calculated using Henry’s law and the ideal gas equation.


### 3.3. Analytical Procedure

Gases adsorbed on rock fragments in the IsoJar™ containers were desorbed into the headspace by ultrasonic shaking. Concentrations of O2, N2, CO2, CH4, C2H6, and C3H8 in headspace gas were determined by gas chromatography (GC) using a GC7890A Valve System (Agilent Technologies, USA). Carbon isotopic values (δ13CCH4 and δ13CCO2) were determined by GC combustion isotope-ratio mass spectrometry (GC-C-IRMS), using an IsoPrime GC-MS system (GV Instruments, UK), and are expressed in the usual VPDB δ notation. The lower limit of determination of carbon isotope ratios (δ13CCH4 and δ13CCO2) requires concentrations of 0.01%. Details of GC and GC-C-IRMS procedures can be found in Waseda and Iwano [43].


## 3.1. IsoJar™ Samples

### 3.1.1. Effect of Storage Period

Core samples including in situ pore water (300–400 g), crushed to pieces roughly 30–50 mm in diameter, were placed in IsoJar™ containers with 250–300 g of “filling” water. HgCl2-saturated or 10% BKC aqueous solution (10 drops (~0.5 ml) of either) was added to suppress microbial activity, and the jars were sealed with an air headspace. Final concentrations of both microbicides in the jars were about 0.01%–0.02%. The jars were kept in the dark at room temperature for 5–92 d before analysis. Details of each experiment are summarized in Table 1 and Table S2.Table 1
Information on IsoJar™ samples and analytical results of headspace gases.
Sample no.
Amount of core sample (g)
Amount of water (g)
Depth of groundwater
Type of additive
Storage period (days)
CO2 (%)
O2 (%)
N2 (%)
CH4 (%)
δ13CCH4(‰ VPDB)
δ13CCO2(‰ VPDB)
IJ1
220
350
350 m
None
67
6.5
6.9
83
0.030
−45.4
+13.6
IJ2
369
262
350 m
None
41
8.9
2.8
79
6.7
−35.5
+13.2
IJ3
342
304
350 m
None
79
3.1
11.0
80
2.8
−30.8
+13.2
IJ4
360
269
50 m
None
17
0.63
14.6
80
2.2
−49.3
+5.0
IJ5
239
333
50 m
None
68
2.3
9.4
86
0.014
−51.4
+2.1
IJ6
411
247
50 m
None
42
6.7
0.01
79
12.5
−42.5
+3.5
IJ7
339
277
50 m
None
79
2.5
5.4
80
9.6
−36.8
−1.0
IJ8
338
279
50 m
None
79
0.36
18.1
79
0.45
−22.3
−1.4
IJ9
302
274
350 m
HgCl2
19
3.9
7.9
80
5.8
−57.7
+15.2
IJ10
263
328
350 m
HgCl2
67
5.0
2.4
86
4.8
−40.7
+14.5
IJ11
380
274
350 m
HgCl2
41
4.7
5.1
76
12.3
−48.8
+15.7
IJ12
383
241
350 m
HgCl2
92
1.49
14.1
80
0.88
−26.8
+12.9
IJ13
358
262
50 m
HgCl2
19
2.6
8.1
75
11.9
−55.3
+6.0
IJ14
225
349
50 m
HgCl2
68
0.52
16.8
81
0.059
+4.7
+2.7
IJ15
420
252
50 m
HgCl2
42
4.0
3.6
83
7.5
−45.0
+4.7
IJ16
338
284
50 m
HgCl2
79
0.57
14.2
80
2.0
−38.2
+2.5
IJ17
341
229
350 m
BKC
19
6.2
6.9
82
1.89
−50.3
+14.5
IJ18
264
281
350 m
BKC
67
8.9
2.2
80
5.2
−44.6
+13.5
IJ19
388
253
350 m
BKC
41
7.4
0.02
76
15.5
−48.6
+14.3
IJ20
333
302
350 m
BKC
79
5.0
4.4
79
7.6
−46.2
+14.4
IJ21
320
290
50 m
BKC
19
4.7
1.82
85
5.5
−46.2
+3.7
IJ22
345
256
50 m
BKC
68
3.7
8.2
84
2.3
−26.7
+2.8
IJ23
392
258
50 m
BKC
42
4.4
3.2
80
10.2
−42.7
+4.3
IJ24
368
291
50 m
BKC
79
2.2
4.1
80
10.2
−41.8
+2.2
IJ25
360
266
50 m
BKC
79
2.6
3.0
79
13.4
−43.5
+3.2
IJ26
388
242
350 m
None
5
2.3
14.2
79
3.6
−55.4
+14.5
IJ27
379
272
350 m
None
5
3.0
11.6
78
6.1
−53.8
+14.8
IJ28
333
316
350 m
None
5
2.1
12.7
80
3.5
−55.5
+15.1The cores were obtained immediately after drilling of borehole 350-Fz-01 from the bottom of the east shaft (Figure3). Although distilled or tap water is usually used in the IsoJar™ method, groundwater from depths of 53.5–64.5 m and 350 m in borehole 13-350-C01 (drilled in the 350 m gallery; Figure 3) was used to match the 50 m groundwater used by Funaki et al. [14]. The priority in this study was to evaluate the effects of sampling method on the carbon isotopic ratios of CH4 and CO2, rather than to obtain accurate in situ values. A large portion of CH4 dissolved in groundwater around the URL had already escaped due to the pressure decrease associated with excavation, so it was expected that only small amounts of gas would remain in cores. Groundwater, rather than tap water, was used to compensate for this (with water from borehole 13-350-C01 being used because water was not available from borehole 350-Fz-01). Core samples IJ1–IJ25 were from depths of 384–416 m (Table S2). Core samples IJ26–IJ28 were from a depth of 470 m (Table S2) and kept in vacuum storage for one month after drilling. At these depths, the C isotopic ratios for CH4 and CO2 had similar values to those from 350 m depth [28].


### 3.1.2. Effect of Additives

The effective amount of additives was investigated as follows. IsoJar™ samples were prepared as described in Section3.1.1, with up to 20 ml of BKC and HgCl2 solutions per jar (Table 2 and Table S3). All core samples were from a depth of 480 m in 350-Fz-01. Fresh cores taken immediately after drilling were not available for analysis, and the samples used in this study had been kept in vacuum storage for about six months. Groundwater from borehole 13-350-C01 was used as filling water. Headspace gas compositions were determined after storage in IsoJar™ for one month.Table 2
Information on IsoJar™ samples and analytical results of headspace gases for Section3.1.2.
Sample no.
Amount of core sample (g)
Amount of water (g)
Type of additive
Amount of additive (ml)
Concentration of additives (wt%)
Storage period (days)
CO2 (%)
O2 (%)
N2 (%)
CH4 (%)
δ13CCH4(‰ VPDB)
δ13CCO2(‰ VPDB)
IJ29
311
310
None
0
0
27
12.8
1.0
86
0.039
−48.3
+14.2
IJ30
299
282
None
0
0
27
13.7
1.0
85
0.029
−74.6
+15.2
IJ31
284
324
BKC
1
0.03
27
12.5
1.0
86
0.036
−74.2
+14.0
IJ32
323
297
BKC
1
0.03
27
12.4
1.0
87
0.040
−84.1
+13.8
IJ33
332
312
BKC
3
0.10
27
11.6
4.2
84
0.053
−88.5
+13.9
IJ34
352
279
BKC
3
0.11
28
13.1
2.0
85
0.046
−75.7
+13.0
IJ35
368
290
BKC
6
0.20
28
10.2
4.1
86
0.067
−58.1
+12.9
IJ36
382
278
BKC
6
0.21
28
10.2
2.9
87
0.067
−90.4
+12.5
IJ37
309
299
BKC
10
0.32
28
12.8
7.3
80
0.054
−56.2
+14.8
IJ38
310
280
BKC
10
0.34
28
12.8
6.6
80
0.052
−57.9
+14.6
IJ39
340
285
BKC
20
0.66
29
10.9
6.2
83
0.068
−54.5
+13.6
IJ40
336
309
BKC
20
0.61
29
9.0
3.7
87
0.105
−57.9
+13.4
IJ41
272
319
HgCl2
1
0.02
29
8.7
10.9
80
0.042
−59.0
+15.0
IJ42
323
296
HgCl2
1
0.02
29
10.2
9.9
80
0.041
−63.1
+14.9
IJ43
348
284
HgCl2
5
0.13
29
10.8
9.2
80
0.037
−65.4
+15.0
IJ44
319
314
HgCl2
5
0.12
29
11.0
9.0
80
0.044
−60.1
+14.8
IJ45
293
322
HgCl2
10
0.22
30
12.7
8.4
79
0.043
−62.6
+15.2
IJ46
362
293
HgCl2
10
0.24
30
13.3
6.9
80
0.046
−61.9
+15.3
IJ47
285
308
HgCl2
20
0.45
30
21
7.0
72
0.033
−62.2
+16.6
IJ48
362
295
HgCl2
20
0.47
30
23
6.0
71
0.045
−62.1
+16.1


## 3.1.1. Effect of Storage Period

Core samples including in situ pore water (300–400 g), crushed to pieces roughly 30–50 mm in diameter, were placed in IsoJar™ containers with 250–300 g of “filling” water. HgCl2-saturated or 10% BKC aqueous solution (10 drops (~0.5 ml) of either) was added to suppress microbial activity, and the jars were sealed with an air headspace. Final concentrations of both microbicides in the jars were about 0.01%–0.02%. The jars were kept in the dark at room temperature for 5–92 d before analysis. Details of each experiment are summarized in Table 1 and Table S2.Table 1
Information on IsoJar™ samples and analytical results of headspace gases.
Sample no.
Amount of core sample (g)
Amount of water (g)
Depth of groundwater
Type of additive
Storage period (days)
CO2 (%)
O2 (%)
N2 (%)
CH4 (%)
δ13CCH4(‰ VPDB)
δ13CCO2(‰ VPDB)
IJ1
220
350
350 m
None
67
6.5
6.9
83
0.030
−45.4
+13.6
IJ2
369
262
350 m
None
41
8.9
2.8
79
6.7
−35.5
+13.2
IJ3
342
304
350 m
None
79
3.1
11.0
80
2.8
−30.8
+13.2
IJ4
360
269
50 m
None
17
0.63
14.6
80
2.2
−49.3
+5.0
IJ5
239
333
50 m
None
68
2.3
9.4
86
0.014
−51.4
+2.1
IJ6
411
247
50 m
None
42
6.7
0.01
79
12.5
−42.5
+3.5
IJ7
339
277
50 m
None
79
2.5
5.4
80
9.6
−36.8
−1.0
IJ8
338
279
50 m
None
79
0.36
18.1
79
0.45
−22.3
−1.4
IJ9
302
274
350 m
HgCl2
19
3.9
7.9
80
5.8
−57.7
+15.2
IJ10
263
328
350 m
HgCl2
67
5.0
2.4
86
4.8
−40.7
+14.5
IJ11
380
274
350 m
HgCl2
41
4.7
5.1
76
12.3
−48.8
+15.7
IJ12
383
241
350 m
HgCl2
92
1.49
14.1
80
0.88
−26.8
+12.9
IJ13
358
262
50 m
HgCl2
19
2.6
8.1
75
11.9
−55.3
+6.0
IJ14
225
349
50 m
HgCl2
68
0.52
16.8
81
0.059
+4.7
+2.7
IJ15
420
252
50 m
HgCl2
42
4.0
3.6
83
7.5
−45.0
+4.7
IJ16
338
284
50 m
HgCl2
79
0.57
14.2
80
2.0
−38.2
+2.5
IJ17
341
229
350 m
BKC
19
6.2
6.9
82
1.89
−50.3
+14.5
IJ18
264
281
350 m
BKC
67
8.9
2.2
80
5.2
−44.6
+13.5
IJ19
388
253
350 m
BKC
41
7.4
0.02
76
15.5
−48.6
+14.3
IJ20
333
302
350 m
BKC
79
5.0
4.4
79
7.6
−46.2
+14.4
IJ21
320
290
50 m
BKC
19
4.7
1.82
85
5.5
−46.2
+3.7
IJ22
345
256
50 m
BKC
68
3.7
8.2
84
2.3
−26.7
+2.8
IJ23
392
258
50 m
BKC
42
4.4
3.2
80
10.2
−42.7
+4.3
IJ24
368
291
50 m
BKC
79
2.2
4.1
80
10.2
−41.8
+2.2
IJ25
360
266
50 m
BKC
79
2.6
3.0
79
13.4
−43.5
+3.2
IJ26
388
242
350 m
None
5
2.3
14.2
79
3.6
−55.4
+14.5
IJ27
379
272
350 m
None
5
3.0
11.6
78
6.1
−53.8
+14.8
IJ28
333
316
350 m
None
5
2.1
12.7
80
3.5
−55.5
+15.1The cores were obtained immediately after drilling of borehole 350-Fz-01 from the bottom of the east shaft (Figure3). Although distilled or tap water is usually used in the IsoJar™ method, groundwater from depths of 53.5–64.5 m and 350 m in borehole 13-350-C01 (drilled in the 350 m gallery; Figure 3) was used to match the 50 m groundwater used by Funaki et al. [14]. The priority in this study was to evaluate the effects of sampling method on the carbon isotopic ratios of CH4 and CO2, rather than to obtain accurate in situ values. A large portion of CH4 dissolved in groundwater around the URL had already escaped due to the pressure decrease associated with excavation, so it was expected that only small amounts of gas would remain in cores. Groundwater, rather than tap water, was used to compensate for this (with water from borehole 13-350-C01 being used because water was not available from borehole 350-Fz-01). Core samples IJ1–IJ25 were from depths of 384–416 m (Table S2). Core samples IJ26–IJ28 were from a depth of 470 m (Table S2) and kept in vacuum storage for one month after drilling. At these depths, the C isotopic ratios for CH4 and CO2 had similar values to those from 350 m depth [28].


## 3.1.2. Effect of Additives

The effective amount of additives was investigated as follows. IsoJar™ samples were prepared as described in Section3.1.1, with up to 20 ml of BKC and HgCl2 solutions per jar (Table 2 and Table S3). All core samples were from a depth of 480 m in 350-Fz-01. Fresh cores taken immediately after drilling were not available for analysis, and the samples used in this study had been kept in vacuum storage for about six months. Groundwater from borehole 13-350-C01 was used as filling water. Headspace gas compositions were determined after storage in IsoJar™ for one month.Table 2
Information on IsoJar™ samples and analytical results of headspace gases for Section3.1.2.
Sample no.
Amount of core sample (g)
Amount of water (g)
Type of additive
Amount of additive (ml)
Concentration of additives (wt%)
Storage period (days)
CO2 (%)
O2 (%)
N2 (%)
CH4 (%)
δ13CCH4(‰ VPDB)
δ13CCO2(‰ VPDB)
IJ29
311
310
None
0
0
27
12.8
1.0
86
0.039
−48.3
+14.2
IJ30
299
282
None
0
0
27
13.7
1.0
85
0.029
−74.6
+15.2
IJ31
284
324
BKC
1
0.03
27
12.5
1.0
86
0.036
−74.2
+14.0
IJ32
323
297
BKC
1
0.03
27
12.4
1.0
87
0.040
−84.1
+13.8
IJ33
332
312
BKC
3
0.10
27
11.6
4.2
84
0.053
−88.5
+13.9
IJ34
352
279
BKC
3
0.11
28
13.1
2.0
85
0.046
−75.7
+13.0
IJ35
368
290
BKC
6
0.20
28
10.2
4.1
86
0.067
−58.1
+12.9
IJ36
382
278
BKC
6
0.21
28
10.2
2.9
87
0.067
−90.4
+12.5
IJ37
309
299
BKC
10
0.32
28
12.8
7.3
80
0.054
−56.2
+14.8
IJ38
310
280
BKC
10
0.34
28
12.8
6.6
80
0.052
−57.9
+14.6
IJ39
340
285
BKC
20
0.66
29
10.9
6.2
83
0.068
−54.5
+13.6
IJ40
336
309
BKC
20
0.61
29
9.0
3.7
87
0.105
−57.9
+13.4
IJ41
272
319
HgCl2
1
0.02
29
8.7
10.9
80
0.042
−59.0
+15.0
IJ42
323
296
HgCl2
1
0.02
29
10.2
9.9
80
0.041
−63.1
+14.9
IJ43
348
284
HgCl2
5
0.13
29
10.8
9.2
80
0.037
−65.4
+15.0
IJ44
319
314
HgCl2
5
0.12
29
11.0
9.0
80
0.044
−60.1
+14.8
IJ45
293
322
HgCl2
10
0.22
30
12.7
8.4
79
0.043
−62.6
+15.2
IJ46
362
293
HgCl2
10
0.24
30
13.3
6.9
80
0.046
−61.9
+15.3
IJ47
285
308
HgCl2
20
0.45
30
21
7.0
72
0.033
−62.2
+16.6
IJ48
362
295
HgCl2
20
0.47
30
23
6.0
71
0.045
−62.1
+16.1


## 3.2. EV Samples

The EV sampling procedure involved the preliminary evacuation of septum-topped 50 ml glass vials containing ~1 ml phosphoric acid (85 wt%). Acidification removed any inorganic carbon as CO2, with the CO2 concentration being measured as total inorganic carbon (TIC). Groundwater (15–30 ml, from borehole 09-V250-M02#1 drilled from the 250 m gallery; Figure 3) was introduced by a syringe through a 0.22 μm membrane filter to remove microsized carbonate grains and microbes. Samples were stored in the dark at room temperature for 5–98 d, after which ultrapure He was added by a syringe to equalize headspace gas and atmospheric pressures. The sample was left to stand overnight for gas exchange equilibrium to be established between the headspace and dissolved gases. The composition of the headspace gas was determined by GC, with the concentration of dissolved gas being calculated using Henry’s law and the ideal gas equation.


## 3.3. Analytical Procedure

Gases adsorbed on rock fragments in the IsoJar™ containers were desorbed into the headspace by ultrasonic shaking. Concentrations of O2, N2, CO2, CH4, C2H6, and C3H8 in headspace gas were determined by gas chromatography (GC) using a GC7890A Valve System (Agilent Technologies, USA). Carbon isotopic values (δ13CCH4 and δ13CCO2) were determined by GC combustion isotope-ratio mass spectrometry (GC-C-IRMS), using an IsoPrime GC-MS system (GV Instruments, UK), and are expressed in the usual VPDB δ notation. The lower limit of determination of carbon isotope ratios (δ13CCH4 and δ13CCO2) requires concentrations of 0.01%. Details of GC and GC-C-IRMS procedures can be found in Waseda and Iwano [43].


## 4. Results

Headspace concentrations of the gases analyzed andδ13CCH4 and δ13CCO2 values for the IsoJar™ samples prepared as described in Section 3.1.1 are listed in Table 1 and Table S2, and the results for the EV samples are listed in Table 3 and Table S4.Table 3
δ13CCH4, δ13CCO2, methane, and TIC contents in EV samples.
Sample no.
Storage period (days)
Sampling depth of groundwater (ground level -m)
δ13CCH4 (‰ VPDB)
δ13CCO2 (‰ VPDB)
Concentration of dissolved CH4 (mmol kg−1)
Concentration of total inorganic carbon (TIC) (mmol kg−1)
EV1
6
248.5
−56.7
+17.1
—
—
EV2
55
248.5
−54.0
+17.8
7.8
—
EV3
98
248.5
−53.7
+17.3
8.5
—
EV4
6
248.5
−56.8
+16.9
8.7
42
EV5
55
248.5
−54.5
+16.2
6.7
37
EV6
98
248.5
−52.7
+16.7
6.7
35Sample contamination by air does not affect the present discussion of isotopic ratios because concentrations of CH4 and CO2 in air are much lower than those in the free gas from groundwater (where CH4 = 74%–100%; CO2 = 1%–20%; [28, 34]).CO2 in the free gas undergoes isotopic fractionation during exchange with dissolved inorganic carbon (e.g., CO2(aq), HCO3−, and CO32−), with HCO3− being the dominant aqueous species at around neutral pH. To compare δ13CCO2 values of the IsoJar™ samples with those of the EV samples, a fractionation correction (intrinsic isotopic fractionation factor) of +7.9‰ between CO2 gas and HCO3− at 25°C [44] was added to δ13CCO2 values measured for the IsoJar™ samples. The range of room temperatures was 20°C–25°C, giving an error of up to −0.6‰.Variations inδ13CCO2 and δ13CCH4 values with storage time are shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. IsoJar™ samples with groundwater (350 m) stored for less than one week give values similar to the EV samples. Storage periods of ≤7 d and ≥20 d were considered, as no data are available for the interval of 7–20 d.Figure 4
Temporal variations in (a)δ13CCO2 and (b) δ13CCH4 after sampling. Solid arrow indicates the trend for samples with 350 m groundwater; dashed arrow indicates the trend for samples with 50 m groundwater.
(a)
(b)Theδ13CCO2 and δ13CCH4 ratios for the EV samples are relatively constant, although δ13CCH4 values show a small variation (<4‰) after 98 d (Figure 4(b)), which is consistent with a previous study [28]. It is possible that some microbes are not removed by 0.22 μm groundwater filtration (e.g., [45]), and this might have caused the slight variation in δ13CCH4 values. Differences between carbon isotopic values of CH4 and CO2 (δ13CCO2 − δ13CCH4 = isotopic separation factor; [46]) in the Horonobe area decrease slightly (<1‰) with increasing depth and temperature according to isotopic equilibrium values, with values at depths of 250 m and 350 m being similar to each other within the natural variation of ~2‰ (1σ) [28]. Therefore, δ13CCO2 and δ13CCH4 values of 250 m groundwater obtained by the EV method (Table 3) were used as reference values for the IsoJar™ samples with 350 m groundwater.Theδ13CCO2 values for IsoJar™ samples show two separate trends for 350 m and 50 m groundwater, with both showing a slight decrease over time, from +15‰ at 5 d to +13‰ at 92 d and from +5‰ at 17 d to −1‰ to +3‰ at 79 d, respectively (Figure 4(a)). The patterns are the same for both BKC and HgCl2 additives. The two trends suggest that the δ13CCO2 ratios represent dissolved gases from different depths. The concentration of CO2 in the groundwater, as HCO3−, is relatively high even when degassed at atmospheric pressure (30–50 mmol kg−1; [47]), compared with that of adsorbed CO2, so carbon isotopic values should be largely dependent on dissolved CO2. The δ13CCO2 values of samples with 50 m groundwater (dashed line in Figure 4(a)) are distinct from those of samples with 350 m groundwater, indicating that the former samples are strongly contaminated.Theδ13CCH4 values for IsoJar™ samples (Figure 4(b)) increase markedly with time regardless of additives and fluctuate by more than 30‰ after 80 d; separate trends for different depths are not evident. The concentration of CH4 remaining in the groundwater at atmospheric pressure after sampling is relatively low (~3 mmol kg−1; [47]), and δ13CCH4 values for the IsoJar™ samples mainly represent gases adsorbed on cores. Therefore, while the relatively large amounts of dissolved CO2 reduced the effects of isotopic fractionation on δ13CCO2 values, δ13CCH4 values were strongly affected.The results of the effect of additives as described in Section3.1.2 are shown and discussed in Section 5.2.


## 5. Discussion

### 5.1. Methane Oxidation

During methane oxidation, decreasing CH4 and increasing CO2 concentrations are associated with carbon isotopic fractionation, resulting in enrichment of 13C in unreacted CH4 and depletion in CO2 produced. However, there is no clear relationship between headspace gas concentrations and storage period, possibly because of the variability of adsorbed gas levels in natural samples. An apparent carbon isotopic fractionation factor, α, defined as α=δ13CCO2+1000/δ13CCH4+1000, was calculated using the δ13CCO2 and δ13CCH4 values in Table 1 (Figure 5). Initial values of α in the Horonobe samples, calculated using the results of the EV method, were around 1.06–1.08, in good agreement with those determined by Miyakawa et al. [28]. The values of α for the IsoJar™ samples decreased from ~1.07 to 1.04 with increasing storage time (Figure 5). An earlier study reported a similar trend, where microbial methane oxidation in marine sediments gave an α value of ~1.08 in the methanogenesis zone, decreasing to ~1.02 in the methane oxidation zone [48].Figure 5
Temporal variations in the apparent carbon isotopic fractionation factor,α, between CO2 and CH4.A bivariate plot ofδ13CCH4 vs. δ13CCO2 (Figure 6) indicates two trends for the IsoJar™ samples (Figure 6(b)), as in Figure 4(a). Thus, data plotted in Figures 4–6 indicate that δ13CCH4 values in samples stored for more than one week were affected by CH4 oxidation to CO2. δ13CCH4 and δ13CCO2 values reported by Funaki et al. [14] are plotted between the two trends (Figure 6(b)). It seems, therefore, that the variations can be explained by the mixing of the two trends, indicating effects of both methane oxidation and contamination of 50 m groundwater in the IsoJar™ container after sampling.Figure 6
Plot ofδ13CCH4 vs. δ13CCO2 in coexisting gases. (a) Grey areas show fields relating to different gas sources and isotopic shifts resulting from production and oxidation (adapted from [50]). The area indicated by the dashed rectangle is enlarged in (b). (b) Solid arrow indicates a methane oxidation trend for samples with 350 m groundwater; dashed arrow indicates the trend for samples with 50 m groundwater.
(a)
(b)


### 5.2. Effect of Additives

Significant isotopic fractionation occurred in the IsoJar™ samples, strongly affectingδ13CCH4 values despite the addition of BKC or HgCl2 (Figure 4), suggesting that the amounts of additives used were insufficient to suppress microbial activity. Results of effect of additives as described in Section 3.1.2 are listed in Table 2 and shown in Figure 7. With <10 ml BKC solution or <0.3% BKC concentration, δ13CCH4 values fluctuated significantly, and isotopic compositions became lighter. This is opposite to the effect of microbial carbonate reduction and may be due to low CH4 concentrations (Table 2) resulting from storage of the cores for about six months in a vacuum container (to avoid oxidation by the air and drying), possibly with significant removal of adsorbed gases. An instrumental mass bias of carbon isotope ratio was reported in a very low concentration of hydrocarbons with respect to mass spectrometry [49]. In this study, all the data of CH4 concentrations were above the lower limit of determination of 0.01% (Table 2) indicating that large fluctuations of δ13CCH4 values (Figure 7) are not due to instrumental mass bias. The mechanism of any reaction opposing fractionation is not clear. In a low CH4 concentration, the carbon isotope ratio may be easily disturbed by complex microbial metabolism (e.g., methane oxidation and carbonate reduction). With >10 ml BKC solution or >0.3% BKC concentration, the δ13CCH4 values were relatively constant at about −56‰ (Figure 7), which is in good agreement with the values for EV samples.Figure 7
Plot ofδ13CCH4 values vs. (a) amount of microbial suppressant used and (b) concentration of additives.
(a)
(b)Although theδ13CCH4 values for IsoJar™ samples with HgCl2 solution are relatively constant (Figure 7), they are consistently 5‰–6‰ lower than those with BKC solution. Concentrations of CO2 in the headspace of samples IJ47 and IJ48, to which 20 ml HgCl2 solution was added, are considerably higher than those in the other samples (Table 2). A possible cause of the decrease in δ13CCH4 values may be isotopic fractionation associated with mercuric reactions with methane, which generate HCl and lead to CO2 outgassing. Although this mechanism is not clear, considerable care should be required using HgCl2 as a microbicide with respect to carbon isotope fractionation.


## 5.1. Methane Oxidation

During methane oxidation, decreasing CH4 and increasing CO2 concentrations are associated with carbon isotopic fractionation, resulting in enrichment of 13C in unreacted CH4 and depletion in CO2 produced. However, there is no clear relationship between headspace gas concentrations and storage period, possibly because of the variability of adsorbed gas levels in natural samples. An apparent carbon isotopic fractionation factor, α, defined as α=δ13CCO2+1000/δ13CCH4+1000, was calculated using the δ13CCO2 and δ13CCH4 values in Table 1 (Figure 5). Initial values of α in the Horonobe samples, calculated using the results of the EV method, were around 1.06–1.08, in good agreement with those determined by Miyakawa et al. [28]. The values of α for the IsoJar™ samples decreased from ~1.07 to 1.04 with increasing storage time (Figure 5). An earlier study reported a similar trend, where microbial methane oxidation in marine sediments gave an α value of ~1.08 in the methanogenesis zone, decreasing to ~1.02 in the methane oxidation zone [48].Figure 5
Temporal variations in the apparent carbon isotopic fractionation factor,α, between CO2 and CH4.A bivariate plot ofδ13CCH4 vs. δ13CCO2 (Figure 6) indicates two trends for the IsoJar™ samples (Figure 6(b)), as in Figure 4(a). Thus, data plotted in Figures 4–6 indicate that δ13CCH4 values in samples stored for more than one week were affected by CH4 oxidation to CO2. δ13CCH4 and δ13CCO2 values reported by Funaki et al. [14] are plotted between the two trends (Figure 6(b)). It seems, therefore, that the variations can be explained by the mixing of the two trends, indicating effects of both methane oxidation and contamination of 50 m groundwater in the IsoJar™ container after sampling.Figure 6
Plot ofδ13CCH4 vs. δ13CCO2 in coexisting gases. (a) Grey areas show fields relating to different gas sources and isotopic shifts resulting from production and oxidation (adapted from [50]). The area indicated by the dashed rectangle is enlarged in (b). (b) Solid arrow indicates a methane oxidation trend for samples with 350 m groundwater; dashed arrow indicates the trend for samples with 50 m groundwater.
(a)
(b)


## 5.2. Effect of Additives

Significant isotopic fractionation occurred in the IsoJar™ samples, strongly affectingδ13CCH4 values despite the addition of BKC or HgCl2 (Figure 4), suggesting that the amounts of additives used were insufficient to suppress microbial activity. Results of effect of additives as described in Section 3.1.2 are listed in Table 2 and shown in Figure 7. With <10 ml BKC solution or <0.3% BKC concentration, δ13CCH4 values fluctuated significantly, and isotopic compositions became lighter. This is opposite to the effect of microbial carbonate reduction and may be due to low CH4 concentrations (Table 2) resulting from storage of the cores for about six months in a vacuum container (to avoid oxidation by the air and drying), possibly with significant removal of adsorbed gases. An instrumental mass bias of carbon isotope ratio was reported in a very low concentration of hydrocarbons with respect to mass spectrometry [49]. In this study, all the data of CH4 concentrations were above the lower limit of determination of 0.01% (Table 2) indicating that large fluctuations of δ13CCH4 values (Figure 7) are not due to instrumental mass bias. The mechanism of any reaction opposing fractionation is not clear. In a low CH4 concentration, the carbon isotope ratio may be easily disturbed by complex microbial metabolism (e.g., methane oxidation and carbonate reduction). With >10 ml BKC solution or >0.3% BKC concentration, the δ13CCH4 values were relatively constant at about −56‰ (Figure 7), which is in good agreement with the values for EV samples.Figure 7
Plot ofδ13CCH4 values vs. (a) amount of microbial suppressant used and (b) concentration of additives.
(a)
(b)Although theδ13CCH4 values for IsoJar™ samples with HgCl2 solution are relatively constant (Figure 7), they are consistently 5‰–6‰ lower than those with BKC solution. Concentrations of CO2 in the headspace of samples IJ47 and IJ48, to which 20 ml HgCl2 solution was added, are considerably higher than those in the other samples (Table 2). A possible cause of the decrease in δ13CCH4 values may be isotopic fractionation associated with mercuric reactions with methane, which generate HCl and lead to CO2 outgassing. Although this mechanism is not clear, considerable care should be required using HgCl2 as a microbicide with respect to carbon isotope fractionation.


## 6. Conclusions

This study investigated the possible causes of carbon isotopic variations (inδ13CCH4 and δ13CCO2 values) in borehole drillings to 500 m depth, as reported by Funaki et al. [14]. The results have led to improvements in the IsoJar™ method for the determination of carbon isotopic ratios in CH4 and CO2 adsorbed on bore cores. It was found that with air in the IsoJar™ headspace, microbes oxidize CH4 to CO2 during storage, accompanied by isotopic fractionation, especially for samples from depths of <1000 m where microbes are more active. Isotopic fractionation resulted in δ13CCH4 and δ13CCO2 values reaching >30‰ and >2‰ after 80 d storage, respectively, while samples analyzed within a week of sampling showed no such effect. The significant isotopic fractionation in CH4 was due to its low concentration in the sampling container, while the weaker fractionation in CO2 was due to its relatively high concentration. The conventional amount of BKC additive (~0.5 ml of 10% solution) was insufficient to suppress microbial activity at least when using in situ groundwater as filling water. The large variations in isotopic compositions reported by Funaki et al. [14] thus appear to have been caused by microbial methane oxidation in the IsoJar™ containers after sampling and contamination with groundwater from different depths. Important technique improvements are summarized as follows: (1) if long-term sample storage is necessary, >10 ml of 10% BKC solution should be used or >0.3% BKC concentration is required; (2) analysis within a week of sampling is strongly recommended; and (3) for CO2 analysis, groundwater from different depths should not be used.



---

*Source: 2436814-2018-10-01.xml*