# Mechanical and Abrasive Wear Behavior of Metal Sulphide Lubricant Filled Epoxy Composites

Authors: M. Sudheer; N. Karthik Madhyastha; M. Kewin Amanna; B. Jonthan; K. Mayur Jayaprakash
Journal: ISRN Polymer Science
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The present work reveals the effect of the addition of commercial MoS2 (10 wt%) particles on mechanical and two-body abrasive wear behavior of epoxy with/without glass fiber mat reinforcement. The composites were fabricated using casting and simple hand lay-up techniques followed by compression molding. The mechanical properties such as density, hardness, tensile, and flexural properties were determined as per ASTM standards. The abrasive wear testing was carried out using pin-on-disc wear tester for different loads and abrading distances at constant speed of 1 m/s. A significant reduction in wear loss and specific wear rate was noticed after the incorporation of MoS2 filler allowing less wear of matrix during abrasion which in turn facilitated lower fiber damage. However the incorporation of MoS2 particles had a detrimental effect on most of the mechanical properties of the composites. The worn surface features were investigated through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in order to investigate the wear mechanisms.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent times, there has been a remarkable growth in large-scale production of fiber and/or filler-reinforced polymer matrix composites for engineering applications [1]. Among various types of fiber reinforcements, namely, short, long (unidirectionally reinforced UD composites), fabric (bidirectionally reinforced BD composites), and the combinations of fabrics or long fibers in various directions (multidirectionally reinforced), BD reinforcement offers a unique solution to ever increasing demands on advanced materials in terms of better performance and ease in processing. Thermoset epoxy resins are extensively studied as a matrix material as they exhibits low shrinkage, higher mechanical properties, easy fabrication, excellent chemical and moisture resistance, good wettability, and good electrical characteristics [2].One of the well-known reinforcement for polymers is glass fibers. Glass fibers have very high strength and high stiffness. It has been found that size and volume fraction of the fibers/fillers play an important role to improve the mechanical properties such as stiffness and strength. Polymer composites are extensively used in the tribosituations where resistance to abrasive wear is an extremely important criterion. Typical examples are chute liners, conveyor aids, vanes, gears, for pumps handling industrial fluids, sewage and abrasive contaminated water, and so forth. [3]. Polymers filled with solid lubricant (SL) have been extensively studied because of the increasing industrial and material applications. Several researchers  [4–14] have revealed variation in properties of polymer composites filled with solid lubricants such as graphite, molybdenum disulphide (MoS2), and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).Pettarin et al. [4] have assessed the effect of the addition of commercial molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) on the tribological behavior of high molecular weight high density polyethylene and observed that addition of 10 wt% of solid lubricant (MoS2) increased the wear resistance under both sliding and abrasive wear conditions, but with a high cost in its mechanical behaviour. A comprehensive comparative study of four different internal lubricants (PTFE, graphite, MoS2, and SnS2) on sliding wear of epoxy compounds was reported by Jacobs et al. [5]. They observed that only PTFE was beneficial which reduced the specific wear rate by a factor ranging from 10 to 100. In another comparative study between graphite and PTFE as solid lubricants with poly phthalazinone ether sulfone ketone (PPESK), Zhang et al. [6] observed that 5–25 wt% of PTFE and 5–30 wt% of graphite contribute to the improved tribological performance of PPESK at room temperature. It was also observed that PTFE-filled PPESK composites showed much smoother surfaces than same concentration composites filled by graphite. Li et al. [7] demonstrated the combined effect of using two solid lubricants (Graphite and MoS2) for improving the triboperformance of polymer composites.Many researchers [8–13] have proposed that solid lubricant alone will not improve the tribo-performance of neat polymer and along with fiber reinforcement will have beneficiary effect on the performance of composites. Zhang et al. [8] observed that small incorporation of MoS2 was harmful to the improvement of friction and wear behaviors of the carbon fiber-reinforced polyimide composites. In their study, reduction in friction coefficient was observed at above 5 wt%  MoS2, and decrease in wear rate observed was at above 10 wt%  MoS2.A comparative performance of glass-epoxy composites, having graphite of two different levels (2.5 and 4.5 wt%), was reported by Kishore et al. [9]. In their study, a lower coefficient of friction and lesser wear for any combination of load and velocity was observed for higher graphite (4.5 wt%) bearing composite. Improvement in tribo-performance of glass-epoxy composites with graphite as a filler was also reported by Suresha et al. [10] in their recent studies.Wang et al. [11] observed that wear and friction reduction were more significant while the carbon fiber was used as reinforcement along with MoS2 filler in case of nylon 1010 composites. It was mentioned that the ability of the synergistic fillers in helping the formation of thin, uniform, and continuous transfer film would contribute to the increase in wear resistance of nylon composites. Bijwe et al. [12] reported that glass fiber reinforcement (18%) along with solid lubricants (PTFE and MoS2, 2%) enhanced the wear performance of polyethersulfone by an order of two. In case of solid lubricants, PTFE was reported to be more beneficial than MoS2. Zhang et al. [13] noticed that combinative addition of graphite (10%), short carbon fiber (10%), and micro SiO2 (3%) was most effective in improving the friction-reducing and antiwear abilities of polyetherimide composites. Important observation made was that single incorporation of micro SiO2 was harmful to the improvement of friction and wear behavior of polyetherimide composites. These results indicate that wear-reduction action of fiber/fillers is specific to the polymer-filler pair. However, development of the composites based on solid lubricants with enhanced tribological properties often conflicts with the coinciding achievement of superior mechanical strength. As a consequence, it is necessary to study not only the wear behavior, but also, mechanical performance of the composites.Keeping this in view, the present work aims at investigating mechanical and tribological properties ofMoS2 particulate filled epoxy and glass-epoxy composites. Mechanical properties were evaluated under identical test conditions. Here, abrasive wear test was performed under constant sliding velocity and for different sliding distances and normal loads. This study helps in understanding the effect of lubricating filler (MoS2) on neat epoxy and glass-epoxy composites.


## 2. Experimental Details

### 2.1. Materials

Composites were fabricated using epoxy resin (Araldite LY556) and hardener (HY951) supplied by M/s. Hindustan Ciba Geigy Ltd., Mumbai, India. Molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) particles (3-4 μm) obtained from M/s. Tribocor Technologies, Mysore, India, were used as solid lubricant. Bidirectional plain-woven E-glass fabrics (610 GSM) used as reinforcement in the case of laminates were supplied by M/s. Suntech Fiber Ltd., Bengaluru, India. SEM images of glass fibers and solid lubricant particles are presented in Figure 1.SEM pictures of (a) glass fibers and (b)MoS2 particles.
(a)
(b)


### 2.2. Fabrication of Composites

Two methods were used for fabrication of the composites, namely, resin casting and hand lay-up technique.


#### 2.2.1. Resin Casting Method

TheMoS2 fillers were preheated to 80°C for 2 hrs in a hot air oven to remove any moisture present and cooled to ambient temperature. The required quantities of lubricant filler (10 wt%) as calculated by the rule of mixtures were stirred gently into liquid epoxy resin, taking care to avoid the introduction of air bubbles. The resin filler mixture was degassed under vacuum for 2 hours. Hardener was then added to the resin in the ratio of 1 : 10 and then stirred to ensure complete mixing. The mixture was then poured into an open metallic mold coated with release agent to yield specimens of 200×200×3mm upon curing and released from mold after 24 hours. Extreme care has been taken to avoid any undesirable filler settling effect by casting the slurry just prior to its gelling stage, all time keeping it in a stirred condition. This was done to ensure the uniform composition of cast specimens across its volume. Cast composites were postcured at 50°C for 2 hours.


#### 2.2.2. Hand Lay-Up Technique

Composite laminates were prepared by dry hand lay-up method. The epoxy resin is mixed well with weighed amount (10 wt%) ofMoS2 particles. Hardener was added in the ratio of 1 : 10 and then stirred to ensure complete mixing. A releasing agent was applied on mold for easy removal of the composite stack and to obtain the accurate surface finish. The stacking procedure for preparing the laminate consists of placing the glass fabric one above the other with the resin mix well spread between the fabrics. A porous Teflon film was placed on the completed stack, and whole assembly was pressed between mold plates under a load of 0.5 MPa for 24 hours and allowed to cure under the room temperature. To ensure uniform thickness of sample, spacers of 3 mm were used between the mold plates. After demolding post curing was done at 120°C for 2 hours. Composite laminates without MoS2 particles were also prepared for comparison purpose. The laminate so prepared had dimension 250×250×3mm. Details of the fabricated composites are shown in Table 1. Test specimens for the required dimensions were cut using a diamond-tipped cutter.Table 1
Formulation of composite samples.
Sample code
Matrix
Reinforcement
Filler
EP
Epoxy
—
—
EP+SL
Epoxy (90 wt%)
—
MoS2 (10 wt%)
EP+GF
Epoxy(45 wt%)
E-glass fabric (55 wt%)
—
EP+GF+SL
Epoxy (35 wt%)
E-glass fabric (55 wt%)
MoS2 (10 wt%)


### 2.3. Mechanical Testing

Mechanical tests were performed at room temperature and as per ASTM standards. The standards used along with test specimen sizes are listed in Table2. All the mechanical test results reported were calculated as averages over five specimens for each composition.Table 2
ASTM standards and specimen size.
Sl. no.
Property
Standard
Specimen size (mm)
1
Density
ASTM D792
20 × 10 × 3
2
Hardness
ASTM D785
20 × 20 × 3
3
Tensile
ASTM D3039
150 × 12.5 × 3
4
Flexural
ASTM D790
90 × 12.5 × 3
5
Abrasive wear
ASTM G99
10 × 10 × 3Densities of the composite were determined using the Archimedes principle. Hardness of developed composite samples was measured using Rockwell’s Hardness Tester on M-Scale. The tensile tests and flexural tests were investigated using Universal testing machine (JJ Lloyd, London,  capacity 1–20 kN). These tests were performed at a cross-head speed of 2 mm/min considering a gauge length of 50 mm.


### 2.4. Abrasive Wear Test

Two-body abrasive wear studies were carried out on a pin-on-disc machine (Model TR 201 C, Ducom Instruments, Bangalore, India). A composite sample of size10×10×3mm was glued to a mild steel pin having a square cross-section of 10 mm and 50 mm lengths and was abraded against water proof 1200 grits silicon carbide (SiC) paper for uniform contact with the rotating disc. The specimen surface was then cleaned with acetone and dried. The pin along with the specimen was then weighed (Shimadzu, Japan, 0.1 mg accuracy) followed by abrading the specimen against SiC paper of grit size 400 fixed on a disc rotating at 1 m/s. The range of applied load was 5–15 N and five abrading distances, namely, 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300 m under multipass condition. After cleaning with a blower to remove wear debris, the pin was reweighed to calculate weight loss. A minimum of three trials for each specimen was conducted to ensure repeatability of test data. The weight loss was converted into volume loss by using the measured density of the specimen. The specific wear rate (Ks) was calculated using (1):
(1)Ks=∇VL×dm3/Nm,
where ∇V is the volume loss in m3, L is the load in Newton and d is the abrading distance in meters. The scanning electron microscopy photo of SiC abrasive paper of 400 grit size before the test is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
SEM image of  SiC abrasive paper (400 grit size).


### 2.5. SEM Observations

Worn surfaces of samples were observed by using scanning electron microscope (Joel JSM-6380LA, Japan). The sample surfaces were gold coated (Joel JFC-1600, Auto fine coater, Japan) before observation. Worn microstructure of composites has been taken to study the effect of maximum load and maximum sliding distance on abrasive wear of composites.


## 2.1. Materials

Composites were fabricated using epoxy resin (Araldite LY556) and hardener (HY951) supplied by M/s. Hindustan Ciba Geigy Ltd., Mumbai, India. Molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) particles (3-4 μm) obtained from M/s. Tribocor Technologies, Mysore, India, were used as solid lubricant. Bidirectional plain-woven E-glass fabrics (610 GSM) used as reinforcement in the case of laminates were supplied by M/s. Suntech Fiber Ltd., Bengaluru, India. SEM images of glass fibers and solid lubricant particles are presented in Figure 1.SEM pictures of (a) glass fibers and (b)MoS2 particles.
(a)
(b)


## 2.2. Fabrication of Composites

Two methods were used for fabrication of the composites, namely, resin casting and hand lay-up technique.


### 2.2.1. Resin Casting Method

TheMoS2 fillers were preheated to 80°C for 2 hrs in a hot air oven to remove any moisture present and cooled to ambient temperature. The required quantities of lubricant filler (10 wt%) as calculated by the rule of mixtures were stirred gently into liquid epoxy resin, taking care to avoid the introduction of air bubbles. The resin filler mixture was degassed under vacuum for 2 hours. Hardener was then added to the resin in the ratio of 1 : 10 and then stirred to ensure complete mixing. The mixture was then poured into an open metallic mold coated with release agent to yield specimens of 200×200×3mm upon curing and released from mold after 24 hours. Extreme care has been taken to avoid any undesirable filler settling effect by casting the slurry just prior to its gelling stage, all time keeping it in a stirred condition. This was done to ensure the uniform composition of cast specimens across its volume. Cast composites were postcured at 50°C for 2 hours.


### 2.2.2. Hand Lay-Up Technique

Composite laminates were prepared by dry hand lay-up method. The epoxy resin is mixed well with weighed amount (10 wt%) ofMoS2 particles. Hardener was added in the ratio of 1 : 10 and then stirred to ensure complete mixing. A releasing agent was applied on mold for easy removal of the composite stack and to obtain the accurate surface finish. The stacking procedure for preparing the laminate consists of placing the glass fabric one above the other with the resin mix well spread between the fabrics. A porous Teflon film was placed on the completed stack, and whole assembly was pressed between mold plates under a load of 0.5 MPa for 24 hours and allowed to cure under the room temperature. To ensure uniform thickness of sample, spacers of 3 mm were used between the mold plates. After demolding post curing was done at 120°C for 2 hours. Composite laminates without MoS2 particles were also prepared for comparison purpose. The laminate so prepared had dimension 250×250×3mm. Details of the fabricated composites are shown in Table 1. Test specimens for the required dimensions were cut using a diamond-tipped cutter.Table 1
Formulation of composite samples.
Sample code
Matrix
Reinforcement
Filler
EP
Epoxy
—
—
EP+SL
Epoxy (90 wt%)
—
MoS2 (10 wt%)
EP+GF
Epoxy(45 wt%)
E-glass fabric (55 wt%)
—
EP+GF+SL
Epoxy (35 wt%)
E-glass fabric (55 wt%)
MoS2 (10 wt%)


## 2.2.1. Resin Casting Method

TheMoS2 fillers were preheated to 80°C for 2 hrs in a hot air oven to remove any moisture present and cooled to ambient temperature. The required quantities of lubricant filler (10 wt%) as calculated by the rule of mixtures were stirred gently into liquid epoxy resin, taking care to avoid the introduction of air bubbles. The resin filler mixture was degassed under vacuum for 2 hours. Hardener was then added to the resin in the ratio of 1 : 10 and then stirred to ensure complete mixing. The mixture was then poured into an open metallic mold coated with release agent to yield specimens of 200×200×3mm upon curing and released from mold after 24 hours. Extreme care has been taken to avoid any undesirable filler settling effect by casting the slurry just prior to its gelling stage, all time keeping it in a stirred condition. This was done to ensure the uniform composition of cast specimens across its volume. Cast composites were postcured at 50°C for 2 hours.


## 2.2.2. Hand Lay-Up Technique

Composite laminates were prepared by dry hand lay-up method. The epoxy resin is mixed well with weighed amount (10 wt%) ofMoS2 particles. Hardener was added in the ratio of 1 : 10 and then stirred to ensure complete mixing. A releasing agent was applied on mold for easy removal of the composite stack and to obtain the accurate surface finish. The stacking procedure for preparing the laminate consists of placing the glass fabric one above the other with the resin mix well spread between the fabrics. A porous Teflon film was placed on the completed stack, and whole assembly was pressed between mold plates under a load of 0.5 MPa for 24 hours and allowed to cure under the room temperature. To ensure uniform thickness of sample, spacers of 3 mm were used between the mold plates. After demolding post curing was done at 120°C for 2 hours. Composite laminates without MoS2 particles were also prepared for comparison purpose. The laminate so prepared had dimension 250×250×3mm. Details of the fabricated composites are shown in Table 1. Test specimens for the required dimensions were cut using a diamond-tipped cutter.Table 1
Formulation of composite samples.
Sample code
Matrix
Reinforcement
Filler
EP
Epoxy
—
—
EP+SL
Epoxy (90 wt%)
—
MoS2 (10 wt%)
EP+GF
Epoxy(45 wt%)
E-glass fabric (55 wt%)
—
EP+GF+SL
Epoxy (35 wt%)
E-glass fabric (55 wt%)
MoS2 (10 wt%)


## 2.3. Mechanical Testing

Mechanical tests were performed at room temperature and as per ASTM standards. The standards used along with test specimen sizes are listed in Table2. All the mechanical test results reported were calculated as averages over five specimens for each composition.Table 2
ASTM standards and specimen size.
Sl. no.
Property
Standard
Specimen size (mm)
1
Density
ASTM D792
20 × 10 × 3
2
Hardness
ASTM D785
20 × 20 × 3
3
Tensile
ASTM D3039
150 × 12.5 × 3
4
Flexural
ASTM D790
90 × 12.5 × 3
5
Abrasive wear
ASTM G99
10 × 10 × 3Densities of the composite were determined using the Archimedes principle. Hardness of developed composite samples was measured using Rockwell’s Hardness Tester on M-Scale. The tensile tests and flexural tests were investigated using Universal testing machine (JJ Lloyd, London,  capacity 1–20 kN). These tests were performed at a cross-head speed of 2 mm/min considering a gauge length of 50 mm.


## 2.4. Abrasive Wear Test

Two-body abrasive wear studies were carried out on a pin-on-disc machine (Model TR 201 C, Ducom Instruments, Bangalore, India). A composite sample of size10×10×3mm was glued to a mild steel pin having a square cross-section of 10 mm and 50 mm lengths and was abraded against water proof 1200 grits silicon carbide (SiC) paper for uniform contact with the rotating disc. The specimen surface was then cleaned with acetone and dried. The pin along with the specimen was then weighed (Shimadzu, Japan, 0.1 mg accuracy) followed by abrading the specimen against SiC paper of grit size 400 fixed on a disc rotating at 1 m/s. The range of applied load was 5–15 N and five abrading distances, namely, 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300 m under multipass condition. After cleaning with a blower to remove wear debris, the pin was reweighed to calculate weight loss. A minimum of three trials for each specimen was conducted to ensure repeatability of test data. The weight loss was converted into volume loss by using the measured density of the specimen. The specific wear rate (Ks) was calculated using (1):
(1)Ks=∇VL×dm3/Nm,
where ∇V is the volume loss in m3, L is the load in Newton and d is the abrading distance in meters. The scanning electron microscopy photo of SiC abrasive paper of 400 grit size before the test is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
SEM image of  SiC abrasive paper (400 grit size).


## 2.5. SEM Observations

Worn surfaces of samples were observed by using scanning electron microscope (Joel JSM-6380LA, Japan). The sample surfaces were gold coated (Joel JFC-1600, Auto fine coater, Japan) before observation. Worn microstructure of composites has been taken to study the effect of maximum load and maximum sliding distance on abrasive wear of composites.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Mechanical Properties

#### 3.1.1. Density

Density is the simplest property which can be measured easily when a new type of composite material system is developed. Density values are shown in Table3. The addition of 10 wt%  MoS2 particles (5.16 g/cc) resulted in a slight increase in the density of neat epoxy. Further, with the reinforcement of the epoxy with E-glass fibers (2.56 g/cc), the density value was increased notably. Among all the specimens tested, hybrid composite (EP+GF+SL) was found to have the highest density value. This increase in density of composites was mainly due to the high density of the MoS2 fillers and glass fibers.Table 3
Density and hardness of test specimen.
Sample code
Density (g/cc)
Rockwell hardness (M scale)
EP
1.198
77
EP+SL
1.221
80
EP+GF
1.487
90
EP+GF+SL
1.596
92


#### 3.1.2. Hardness

Hardness of a material denotes the resistance offered to the localized plastic deformation. The hardness test results are plotted in Table3. From the table, it can be observed that hardness of neat epoxy specimen slightly increases with addition of MoS2 filler. Thus, it can be seen that the incorporation of MoS2, which increased the density of neat epoxy, also contributed towards the improvement of hardness of neat epoxy. However, the addition of glass fibers greatly improved the hardness of neat epoxy as expected. It was also observed that MoS2 particles have slightly modified hardness of EP+GF samples.


#### 3.1.3. Tensile Properties

Tensile properties are listed in Table4. It was observed that the addition of 10 wt%. of the solid lubricant (MoS2) reduced the tensile strength, tensile modulus and percentage elongation of neat epoxy by nearly 17%, 4%, and 30%, respectively. This was because the addition of MoS2 particles introduced large amount of stress concentration in the resin-filler mixture which led to discontinuities in the matrix in the form of microvoids which ultimately resulted in lowering the tensile properties. The large differences in the densities of the epoxy and MoS2 particles could be the reason for this kind of behaviour. Thus, the addition of MoS2 solid lubricant had a detrimental effect on the tensile properties of the neat epoxy. However, the reinforcement of the plain epoxy with only glass fiber mat resulted in a hike in the tensile strength, tensile modulus, and elongation by nearly an order of five, two, and three, respectively compared to that of neat epoxy. But with the addition of solid lubricant to epoxy-glass composites, the tensile properties were slightly reduced. Thus, from the experimental observation, it could be seen that the addition of solid lubricant (MoS2) had no beneficiary effect on tensile properties of composites.Table 4
Tensile properties of test specimens.
EP
EP+SL
EP+GF
EP+GF+SL
Tensile strengthS (MPa)
58
±
2
48
±
2
258
±
3
233
±
3
Tensile modulusE (GPa)
2.16
±
0.08
2.08
±
0.06
4.14
±
0.04
3.95
±
0.04
Percentage elongatione (%)
3.45
±
0.07
2.42
±
0.05
8.74
±
0.10
6.68
±
0.10


#### 3.1.4. Flexural Properties

The experimental data on flexural testing is presented in Figure3. It is clear that when epoxy was reinforced with the glass fibers, there was a tremendous increase in the flexural strength nearly four times than that of the neat epoxy sample. However, when MoS2 was used as filler in the neat epoxy and glass epoxy sample, there was a reduction in the flexural strength by 11% and 3%, respectively. The factors that reduced the tensile strength also acted to reduce the flexural strength of the composites. Contrary to the variation of flexural strength, an interesting observation was made in case of flexural modulus. It was observed that the inclusion of MoS2 particles has acted to improve the flexural modulus of neat-epoxy and glass epoxy test samples by nearly 8% and 32%, respectively. This trend indicated better stress transfer between the matrix and reinforcement under bending load. The significant increase in flexural modulus with the addition of the lubricating filler to the glass-epoxy composites could possibly be due to synergism between polymer matrix and solid lubricant where lubricant does not interfere with the stress transfer role of the polymer matrix especially under flexural loading conditions [14].Figure 3
Flexural properties of different test specimens.Lancaster [15] pointed out that even with reinforcing fibers, the increase in stiffness of a composite may be greater than the increase in strength. For particulate fillers, there is generally a greater increase in stiffness (i.e. modulus) than in structural strength. This is particularly true for solid lubricant particles, where because of their easy shear properties, they will not generally increase the strength and will sometimes reduce it. In the present study, the results are in accordance with these reported trends. The experimental aspects related to the voids and/or pores which strongly affect the mechanical properties of brittle materials such as thermoset polymer like the epoxy resin used here are mainly responsible for the deterioration in the mechanical properties. This phenomenon of reduction in mechanical properties of polymer composites with addition of solid lubricant was also noticed by earlier researchers [7, 8, 16]. Further investigation is, however, warranted to verify the lubricant effects on mechanical properties at lower loadings.


### 3.2. Abrasive Wear Properties

#### 3.2.1. Abrasive Wear Loss

The measured wear loss values for different loads and test specimens are presented in Figure4. Neat epoxy sample exhibited the maximum wear loss during the test as compared to the rest of the samples. But it was possible to bring down this value of wear loss with the addition of solid lubricant (MoS2). Further reduction in wear loss was recorded when the epoxy specimen was reinforced with the glass fibers. The hybrid composite (EP+GF+SL) exhibited the minimum wear loss among the rest of the samples. The observed wear loss trend for the filled EP+GF composite is in line with the results reported elsewhere [17]. Another important observation was that wear loss increased with the increase in the applied normal load in case of all the specimens. With the increased load, the incorporated filler in the composite may become loosened owing to the wear of matrix material and detach itself from the system leading to higher wear loss [18]. However, the presence of the solid lubricant (MoS2) could reduce the rate of increase of wear loss with the increase in the applied load. Thus, it could be noted that at high loads, the presence of the solid lubricant could bring down the wear loss to a large extent in comparison with the specimens without the solid lubricant.Figure 4
Abrasive wear loss of test specimens at different loads.Wear loss observed was lower for specimens with solid lubricant particles.MoS2 has a hexagonal crystal structure with the intrinsic property of easy shear [19], and these particles act as an effective barrier for large-scale deformation of epoxy matrix material. The wear loss of the different test specimens follows the sequence: EP>EP+SL>EP+GF>EP+GF+SL.


#### 3.2.2. Specific Wear Rate (Ks)

The plot of specific wear rate versus abrading distance of composites at a constant load of 15 N is presented in Figure5. It is clear that specific wear rate decreased considerably with the increase in the sliding distance. The reason is that with the increase in abrading distance, some of the worn particles clog the abrasive paper and hence slows down the further wear. The reinforcement of glass fibers has reduced the wear rate of EP and EP+SL composites by an order of magnitude of four and three, respectively, after an abrading distance of 60 m. This is due to the fact that fibers have high hardness values and thus better resistance against abrasion. Thus, the rate at which material is removed decreases after glass fiber reinforcement as expected. The plot also reveals the effective role of MoS2 particles in bringing down the wear rate of EP and EP+GF composites. The obtained specific wear rate values are in agreement with the findings reported in the literature [20, 21]. This result clearly indicates that the specific wear rate depends on abrading distances.Figure 5
Specific wear rate versus sliding distance for different test specimens.The literature on the correlation studies on the fiber-reinforced composites indicates that, generally, the abrasive wear performance is directly related toSe factor where S is the ultimate tensile strength and e is the elongation to break [22]. Various other factors such as S,e,H (hardness), HSe, and S2e are also reported to be responsible for controlling the wear performance [23]. In the fabric-reinforced composites selected in this work, however, these properties could play hardly any role in controlling the wear. The Se factor or HSe factor is the highest for EP+GF composites (Table 4), while its performance was not the best.


#### 3.2.3. Worn Surface Morphology

In general, it was observed that the major wear mechanisms responsible for abrasive wear are microploughing, microcracking, and microcutting [24]. Figures 6(a) and 6(b) show the worn surface morphology of EP and EP+SL composites under 15 N load after 300 m sliding distance and under multipass abrasive wear condition. From these micrographs, one can observe that EP specimen exhibits slightly rougher worn surface compared to EP+SL composite. This clearly indicates the wear resistance property imparted by lubricant particles. Wear tracks are formed during multipass wear due to micro-cutting. It is clear from the magnified image (Figure 6(c)) that initially microcracks were formed around MoS2 particles, and particles were removed under compression and shear. Wear track consisted of wear debris which included loose matrix material and MoS2 particles. Figure 6(c) displays wear debris formation. Small round particles of 3-4 μm in the micrograph could be MoS2 particles.Worn microstructure of composites (a) (×200) EP specimen, (b) (×200) and (c) (×800) EP+SL specimen (test condition: load 15 N, sliding distance 300 m).
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure7(a) illustrates SEM picture of EP+GF composite for 15 N load and 300 m sliding distance. Formation of wear debris, adherence of the debris on fibers, and breakage of fibers are the important wear mechanisms which could be observed from picture. Interface separation between matrix and the fiber can also be seen. Figure 7(b) illustrates SEM picture of EP+GF+SL composite for 15 N load and 300 m sliding distance. Overall surface was smoother than the previous one, though the wear behavior is almost similar. This could be because of MoS2 film formed between the composite and counterface. The EP+GF+SL composite suffered lowest damage and wear during tribo-tests. The observed mechanisms support measured values of wear loss for 15 N load. Figure has evidenced micro-cracking, chip formation, exposure of fibers, and less fiber breakage. Less damage to matrix and embedded fiber is mainly due to the presence of MoS2 particles acting as antiwear additive and hence retard wear loss. A very rare worn surface morphology observed is back transfer of counterface material (SiC particles) into composite surface. SiC abrasive particles from the emery paper penetrated into composite specimens are clearly seen in higher magnification image of EP+GF composites (Figure 7(c)). In this figure, matrix fracture due to cutting action of abrasives is apparent, and extent of damage to the matrix and fiber is severe. Spot analysis of this embedded particle using EDAX has shown peaks of carbon (C) and silicon (Si) as indicated in Figure 7(c). This EDAX spectrum confirms the particle embedment effect in EP+GF composite.Worn microstructure of composites (a) (×500) EP+GF specimen, (b) (×500) EP+GF+SL specimen and (c) (×800) EP+GF specimen (Test condition: Load 15 N, sliding distance 300 m), (d) EDAX spectrum confirming the presence of SiC particle embedment into EP+GF composite.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.1. Mechanical Properties

### 3.1.1. Density

Density is the simplest property which can be measured easily when a new type of composite material system is developed. Density values are shown in Table3. The addition of 10 wt%  MoS2 particles (5.16 g/cc) resulted in a slight increase in the density of neat epoxy. Further, with the reinforcement of the epoxy with E-glass fibers (2.56 g/cc), the density value was increased notably. Among all the specimens tested, hybrid composite (EP+GF+SL) was found to have the highest density value. This increase in density of composites was mainly due to the high density of the MoS2 fillers and glass fibers.Table 3
Density and hardness of test specimen.
Sample code
Density (g/cc)
Rockwell hardness (M scale)
EP
1.198
77
EP+SL
1.221
80
EP+GF
1.487
90
EP+GF+SL
1.596
92


### 3.1.2. Hardness

Hardness of a material denotes the resistance offered to the localized plastic deformation. The hardness test results are plotted in Table3. From the table, it can be observed that hardness of neat epoxy specimen slightly increases with addition of MoS2 filler. Thus, it can be seen that the incorporation of MoS2, which increased the density of neat epoxy, also contributed towards the improvement of hardness of neat epoxy. However, the addition of glass fibers greatly improved the hardness of neat epoxy as expected. It was also observed that MoS2 particles have slightly modified hardness of EP+GF samples.


### 3.1.3. Tensile Properties

Tensile properties are listed in Table4. It was observed that the addition of 10 wt%. of the solid lubricant (MoS2) reduced the tensile strength, tensile modulus and percentage elongation of neat epoxy by nearly 17%, 4%, and 30%, respectively. This was because the addition of MoS2 particles introduced large amount of stress concentration in the resin-filler mixture which led to discontinuities in the matrix in the form of microvoids which ultimately resulted in lowering the tensile properties. The large differences in the densities of the epoxy and MoS2 particles could be the reason for this kind of behaviour. Thus, the addition of MoS2 solid lubricant had a detrimental effect on the tensile properties of the neat epoxy. However, the reinforcement of the plain epoxy with only glass fiber mat resulted in a hike in the tensile strength, tensile modulus, and elongation by nearly an order of five, two, and three, respectively compared to that of neat epoxy. But with the addition of solid lubricant to epoxy-glass composites, the tensile properties were slightly reduced. Thus, from the experimental observation, it could be seen that the addition of solid lubricant (MoS2) had no beneficiary effect on tensile properties of composites.Table 4
Tensile properties of test specimens.
EP
EP+SL
EP+GF
EP+GF+SL
Tensile strengthS (MPa)
58
±
2
48
±
2
258
±
3
233
±
3
Tensile modulusE (GPa)
2.16
±
0.08
2.08
±
0.06
4.14
±
0.04
3.95
±
0.04
Percentage elongatione (%)
3.45
±
0.07
2.42
±
0.05
8.74
±
0.10
6.68
±
0.10


### 3.1.4. Flexural Properties

The experimental data on flexural testing is presented in Figure3. It is clear that when epoxy was reinforced with the glass fibers, there was a tremendous increase in the flexural strength nearly four times than that of the neat epoxy sample. However, when MoS2 was used as filler in the neat epoxy and glass epoxy sample, there was a reduction in the flexural strength by 11% and 3%, respectively. The factors that reduced the tensile strength also acted to reduce the flexural strength of the composites. Contrary to the variation of flexural strength, an interesting observation was made in case of flexural modulus. It was observed that the inclusion of MoS2 particles has acted to improve the flexural modulus of neat-epoxy and glass epoxy test samples by nearly 8% and 32%, respectively. This trend indicated better stress transfer between the matrix and reinforcement under bending load. The significant increase in flexural modulus with the addition of the lubricating filler to the glass-epoxy composites could possibly be due to synergism between polymer matrix and solid lubricant where lubricant does not interfere with the stress transfer role of the polymer matrix especially under flexural loading conditions [14].Figure 3
Flexural properties of different test specimens.Lancaster [15] pointed out that even with reinforcing fibers, the increase in stiffness of a composite may be greater than the increase in strength. For particulate fillers, there is generally a greater increase in stiffness (i.e. modulus) than in structural strength. This is particularly true for solid lubricant particles, where because of their easy shear properties, they will not generally increase the strength and will sometimes reduce it. In the present study, the results are in accordance with these reported trends. The experimental aspects related to the voids and/or pores which strongly affect the mechanical properties of brittle materials such as thermoset polymer like the epoxy resin used here are mainly responsible for the deterioration in the mechanical properties. This phenomenon of reduction in mechanical properties of polymer composites with addition of solid lubricant was also noticed by earlier researchers [7, 8, 16]. Further investigation is, however, warranted to verify the lubricant effects on mechanical properties at lower loadings.


## 3.1.1. Density

Density is the simplest property which can be measured easily when a new type of composite material system is developed. Density values are shown in Table3. The addition of 10 wt%  MoS2 particles (5.16 g/cc) resulted in a slight increase in the density of neat epoxy. Further, with the reinforcement of the epoxy with E-glass fibers (2.56 g/cc), the density value was increased notably. Among all the specimens tested, hybrid composite (EP+GF+SL) was found to have the highest density value. This increase in density of composites was mainly due to the high density of the MoS2 fillers and glass fibers.Table 3
Density and hardness of test specimen.
Sample code
Density (g/cc)
Rockwell hardness (M scale)
EP
1.198
77
EP+SL
1.221
80
EP+GF
1.487
90
EP+GF+SL
1.596
92


## 3.1.2. Hardness

Hardness of a material denotes the resistance offered to the localized plastic deformation. The hardness test results are plotted in Table3. From the table, it can be observed that hardness of neat epoxy specimen slightly increases with addition of MoS2 filler. Thus, it can be seen that the incorporation of MoS2, which increased the density of neat epoxy, also contributed towards the improvement of hardness of neat epoxy. However, the addition of glass fibers greatly improved the hardness of neat epoxy as expected. It was also observed that MoS2 particles have slightly modified hardness of EP+GF samples.


## 3.1.3. Tensile Properties

Tensile properties are listed in Table4. It was observed that the addition of 10 wt%. of the solid lubricant (MoS2) reduced the tensile strength, tensile modulus and percentage elongation of neat epoxy by nearly 17%, 4%, and 30%, respectively. This was because the addition of MoS2 particles introduced large amount of stress concentration in the resin-filler mixture which led to discontinuities in the matrix in the form of microvoids which ultimately resulted in lowering the tensile properties. The large differences in the densities of the epoxy and MoS2 particles could be the reason for this kind of behaviour. Thus, the addition of MoS2 solid lubricant had a detrimental effect on the tensile properties of the neat epoxy. However, the reinforcement of the plain epoxy with only glass fiber mat resulted in a hike in the tensile strength, tensile modulus, and elongation by nearly an order of five, two, and three, respectively compared to that of neat epoxy. But with the addition of solid lubricant to epoxy-glass composites, the tensile properties were slightly reduced. Thus, from the experimental observation, it could be seen that the addition of solid lubricant (MoS2) had no beneficiary effect on tensile properties of composites.Table 4
Tensile properties of test specimens.
EP
EP+SL
EP+GF
EP+GF+SL
Tensile strengthS (MPa)
58
±
2
48
±
2
258
±
3
233
±
3
Tensile modulusE (GPa)
2.16
±
0.08
2.08
±
0.06
4.14
±
0.04
3.95
±
0.04
Percentage elongatione (%)
3.45
±
0.07
2.42
±
0.05
8.74
±
0.10
6.68
±
0.10


## 3.1.4. Flexural Properties

The experimental data on flexural testing is presented in Figure3. It is clear that when epoxy was reinforced with the glass fibers, there was a tremendous increase in the flexural strength nearly four times than that of the neat epoxy sample. However, when MoS2 was used as filler in the neat epoxy and glass epoxy sample, there was a reduction in the flexural strength by 11% and 3%, respectively. The factors that reduced the tensile strength also acted to reduce the flexural strength of the composites. Contrary to the variation of flexural strength, an interesting observation was made in case of flexural modulus. It was observed that the inclusion of MoS2 particles has acted to improve the flexural modulus of neat-epoxy and glass epoxy test samples by nearly 8% and 32%, respectively. This trend indicated better stress transfer between the matrix and reinforcement under bending load. The significant increase in flexural modulus with the addition of the lubricating filler to the glass-epoxy composites could possibly be due to synergism between polymer matrix and solid lubricant where lubricant does not interfere with the stress transfer role of the polymer matrix especially under flexural loading conditions [14].Figure 3
Flexural properties of different test specimens.Lancaster [15] pointed out that even with reinforcing fibers, the increase in stiffness of a composite may be greater than the increase in strength. For particulate fillers, there is generally a greater increase in stiffness (i.e. modulus) than in structural strength. This is particularly true for solid lubricant particles, where because of their easy shear properties, they will not generally increase the strength and will sometimes reduce it. In the present study, the results are in accordance with these reported trends. The experimental aspects related to the voids and/or pores which strongly affect the mechanical properties of brittle materials such as thermoset polymer like the epoxy resin used here are mainly responsible for the deterioration in the mechanical properties. This phenomenon of reduction in mechanical properties of polymer composites with addition of solid lubricant was also noticed by earlier researchers [7, 8, 16]. Further investigation is, however, warranted to verify the lubricant effects on mechanical properties at lower loadings.


## 3.2. Abrasive Wear Properties

### 3.2.1. Abrasive Wear Loss

The measured wear loss values for different loads and test specimens are presented in Figure4. Neat epoxy sample exhibited the maximum wear loss during the test as compared to the rest of the samples. But it was possible to bring down this value of wear loss with the addition of solid lubricant (MoS2). Further reduction in wear loss was recorded when the epoxy specimen was reinforced with the glass fibers. The hybrid composite (EP+GF+SL) exhibited the minimum wear loss among the rest of the samples. The observed wear loss trend for the filled EP+GF composite is in line with the results reported elsewhere [17]. Another important observation was that wear loss increased with the increase in the applied normal load in case of all the specimens. With the increased load, the incorporated filler in the composite may become loosened owing to the wear of matrix material and detach itself from the system leading to higher wear loss [18]. However, the presence of the solid lubricant (MoS2) could reduce the rate of increase of wear loss with the increase in the applied load. Thus, it could be noted that at high loads, the presence of the solid lubricant could bring down the wear loss to a large extent in comparison with the specimens without the solid lubricant.Figure 4
Abrasive wear loss of test specimens at different loads.Wear loss observed was lower for specimens with solid lubricant particles.MoS2 has a hexagonal crystal structure with the intrinsic property of easy shear [19], and these particles act as an effective barrier for large-scale deformation of epoxy matrix material. The wear loss of the different test specimens follows the sequence: EP>EP+SL>EP+GF>EP+GF+SL.


### 3.2.2. Specific Wear Rate (Ks)

The plot of specific wear rate versus abrading distance of composites at a constant load of 15 N is presented in Figure5. It is clear that specific wear rate decreased considerably with the increase in the sliding distance. The reason is that with the increase in abrading distance, some of the worn particles clog the abrasive paper and hence slows down the further wear. The reinforcement of glass fibers has reduced the wear rate of EP and EP+SL composites by an order of magnitude of four and three, respectively, after an abrading distance of 60 m. This is due to the fact that fibers have high hardness values and thus better resistance against abrasion. Thus, the rate at which material is removed decreases after glass fiber reinforcement as expected. The plot also reveals the effective role of MoS2 particles in bringing down the wear rate of EP and EP+GF composites. The obtained specific wear rate values are in agreement with the findings reported in the literature [20, 21]. This result clearly indicates that the specific wear rate depends on abrading distances.Figure 5
Specific wear rate versus sliding distance for different test specimens.The literature on the correlation studies on the fiber-reinforced composites indicates that, generally, the abrasive wear performance is directly related toSe factor where S is the ultimate tensile strength and e is the elongation to break [22]. Various other factors such as S,e,H (hardness), HSe, and S2e are also reported to be responsible for controlling the wear performance [23]. In the fabric-reinforced composites selected in this work, however, these properties could play hardly any role in controlling the wear. The Se factor or HSe factor is the highest for EP+GF composites (Table 4), while its performance was not the best.


### 3.2.3. Worn Surface Morphology

In general, it was observed that the major wear mechanisms responsible for abrasive wear are microploughing, microcracking, and microcutting [24]. Figures 6(a) and 6(b) show the worn surface morphology of EP and EP+SL composites under 15 N load after 300 m sliding distance and under multipass abrasive wear condition. From these micrographs, one can observe that EP specimen exhibits slightly rougher worn surface compared to EP+SL composite. This clearly indicates the wear resistance property imparted by lubricant particles. Wear tracks are formed during multipass wear due to micro-cutting. It is clear from the magnified image (Figure 6(c)) that initially microcracks were formed around MoS2 particles, and particles were removed under compression and shear. Wear track consisted of wear debris which included loose matrix material and MoS2 particles. Figure 6(c) displays wear debris formation. Small round particles of 3-4 μm in the micrograph could be MoS2 particles.Worn microstructure of composites (a) (×200) EP specimen, (b) (×200) and (c) (×800) EP+SL specimen (test condition: load 15 N, sliding distance 300 m).
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure7(a) illustrates SEM picture of EP+GF composite for 15 N load and 300 m sliding distance. Formation of wear debris, adherence of the debris on fibers, and breakage of fibers are the important wear mechanisms which could be observed from picture. Interface separation between matrix and the fiber can also be seen. Figure 7(b) illustrates SEM picture of EP+GF+SL composite for 15 N load and 300 m sliding distance. Overall surface was smoother than the previous one, though the wear behavior is almost similar. This could be because of MoS2 film formed between the composite and counterface. The EP+GF+SL composite suffered lowest damage and wear during tribo-tests. The observed mechanisms support measured values of wear loss for 15 N load. Figure has evidenced micro-cracking, chip formation, exposure of fibers, and less fiber breakage. Less damage to matrix and embedded fiber is mainly due to the presence of MoS2 particles acting as antiwear additive and hence retard wear loss. A very rare worn surface morphology observed is back transfer of counterface material (SiC particles) into composite surface. SiC abrasive particles from the emery paper penetrated into composite specimens are clearly seen in higher magnification image of EP+GF composites (Figure 7(c)). In this figure, matrix fracture due to cutting action of abrasives is apparent, and extent of damage to the matrix and fiber is severe. Spot analysis of this embedded particle using EDAX has shown peaks of carbon (C) and silicon (Si) as indicated in Figure 7(c). This EDAX spectrum confirms the particle embedment effect in EP+GF composite.Worn microstructure of composites (a) (×500) EP+GF specimen, (b) (×500) EP+GF+SL specimen and (c) (×800) EP+GF specimen (Test condition: Load 15 N, sliding distance 300 m), (d) EDAX spectrum confirming the presence of SiC particle embedment into EP+GF composite.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.2.1. Abrasive Wear Loss

The measured wear loss values for different loads and test specimens are presented in Figure4. Neat epoxy sample exhibited the maximum wear loss during the test as compared to the rest of the samples. But it was possible to bring down this value of wear loss with the addition of solid lubricant (MoS2). Further reduction in wear loss was recorded when the epoxy specimen was reinforced with the glass fibers. The hybrid composite (EP+GF+SL) exhibited the minimum wear loss among the rest of the samples. The observed wear loss trend for the filled EP+GF composite is in line with the results reported elsewhere [17]. Another important observation was that wear loss increased with the increase in the applied normal load in case of all the specimens. With the increased load, the incorporated filler in the composite may become loosened owing to the wear of matrix material and detach itself from the system leading to higher wear loss [18]. However, the presence of the solid lubricant (MoS2) could reduce the rate of increase of wear loss with the increase in the applied load. Thus, it could be noted that at high loads, the presence of the solid lubricant could bring down the wear loss to a large extent in comparison with the specimens without the solid lubricant.Figure 4
Abrasive wear loss of test specimens at different loads.Wear loss observed was lower for specimens with solid lubricant particles.MoS2 has a hexagonal crystal structure with the intrinsic property of easy shear [19], and these particles act as an effective barrier for large-scale deformation of epoxy matrix material. The wear loss of the different test specimens follows the sequence: EP>EP+SL>EP+GF>EP+GF+SL.


## 3.2.2. Specific Wear Rate (Ks)

The plot of specific wear rate versus abrading distance of composites at a constant load of 15 N is presented in Figure5. It is clear that specific wear rate decreased considerably with the increase in the sliding distance. The reason is that with the increase in abrading distance, some of the worn particles clog the abrasive paper and hence slows down the further wear. The reinforcement of glass fibers has reduced the wear rate of EP and EP+SL composites by an order of magnitude of four and three, respectively, after an abrading distance of 60 m. This is due to the fact that fibers have high hardness values and thus better resistance against abrasion. Thus, the rate at which material is removed decreases after glass fiber reinforcement as expected. The plot also reveals the effective role of MoS2 particles in bringing down the wear rate of EP and EP+GF composites. The obtained specific wear rate values are in agreement with the findings reported in the literature [20, 21]. This result clearly indicates that the specific wear rate depends on abrading distances.Figure 5
Specific wear rate versus sliding distance for different test specimens.The literature on the correlation studies on the fiber-reinforced composites indicates that, generally, the abrasive wear performance is directly related toSe factor where S is the ultimate tensile strength and e is the elongation to break [22]. Various other factors such as S,e,H (hardness), HSe, and S2e are also reported to be responsible for controlling the wear performance [23]. In the fabric-reinforced composites selected in this work, however, these properties could play hardly any role in controlling the wear. The Se factor or HSe factor is the highest for EP+GF composites (Table 4), while its performance was not the best.


## 3.2.3. Worn Surface Morphology

In general, it was observed that the major wear mechanisms responsible for abrasive wear are microploughing, microcracking, and microcutting [24]. Figures 6(a) and 6(b) show the worn surface morphology of EP and EP+SL composites under 15 N load after 300 m sliding distance and under multipass abrasive wear condition. From these micrographs, one can observe that EP specimen exhibits slightly rougher worn surface compared to EP+SL composite. This clearly indicates the wear resistance property imparted by lubricant particles. Wear tracks are formed during multipass wear due to micro-cutting. It is clear from the magnified image (Figure 6(c)) that initially microcracks were formed around MoS2 particles, and particles were removed under compression and shear. Wear track consisted of wear debris which included loose matrix material and MoS2 particles. Figure 6(c) displays wear debris formation. Small round particles of 3-4 μm in the micrograph could be MoS2 particles.Worn microstructure of composites (a) (×200) EP specimen, (b) (×200) and (c) (×800) EP+SL specimen (test condition: load 15 N, sliding distance 300 m).
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure7(a) illustrates SEM picture of EP+GF composite for 15 N load and 300 m sliding distance. Formation of wear debris, adherence of the debris on fibers, and breakage of fibers are the important wear mechanisms which could be observed from picture. Interface separation between matrix and the fiber can also be seen. Figure 7(b) illustrates SEM picture of EP+GF+SL composite for 15 N load and 300 m sliding distance. Overall surface was smoother than the previous one, though the wear behavior is almost similar. This could be because of MoS2 film formed between the composite and counterface. The EP+GF+SL composite suffered lowest damage and wear during tribo-tests. The observed mechanisms support measured values of wear loss for 15 N load. Figure has evidenced micro-cracking, chip formation, exposure of fibers, and less fiber breakage. Less damage to matrix and embedded fiber is mainly due to the presence of MoS2 particles acting as antiwear additive and hence retard wear loss. A very rare worn surface morphology observed is back transfer of counterface material (SiC particles) into composite surface. SiC abrasive particles from the emery paper penetrated into composite specimens are clearly seen in higher magnification image of EP+GF composites (Figure 7(c)). In this figure, matrix fracture due to cutting action of abrasives is apparent, and extent of damage to the matrix and fiber is severe. Spot analysis of this embedded particle using EDAX has shown peaks of carbon (C) and silicon (Si) as indicated in Figure 7(c). This EDAX spectrum confirms the particle embedment effect in EP+GF composite.Worn microstructure of composites (a) (×500) EP+GF specimen, (b) (×500) EP+GF+SL specimen and (c) (×800) EP+GF specimen (Test condition: Load 15 N, sliding distance 300 m), (d) EDAX spectrum confirming the presence of SiC particle embedment into EP+GF composite.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 4. Conclusion

Epoxy, an excellent engineering thermoset plastic, and its composite were evaluated for mechanical and abrasive wear performance. The composites were of three types: first epoxy with MoS2 particles; second epoxy with glass fibers; and third epoxy with glass fibers and MoS2 particles. The solid lubricants and fibers play a vital role in influencing the performance of neat polymer in a beneficial manner. Solid lubricant, namely, MoS2 was proved to be beneficial in abrasive wear mode, and, acted to deteriorate the mechanical performance. SEM studies were proved useful in analyzing wear mechanisms and correlating wear performance.



---

*Source: 242450-2013-05-28.xml*