# Seismic Performance of an Efficient Scissor-Jack-Damper Configuration

Authors: Lihua Zhu; Pengyu Guo; Chenglong Hua; Shiyu Shan
Journal: Shock and Vibration
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Energy-dissipating or damping systems have been widely used in new and retrofitted structures for reducing earthquake damage to structural frames. Most damping devices were installed using diagonal or chevronbrace configurations, until the development of toggle-brace and scissor-jack configurations. This paper presents a modified scissor-jack-damper configuration with substantially improved efficiency. The mechanical behavior of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration is analyzed theoretically, and a formula for the displacement magnification factor of the configuration is proposed. A steel-frame specimen installed with the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration was tested to verify the accuracy of the formula. The seismic responses of an uncontrolled steel-frame structure and of two controlled structures, installed with a diagonal brace and efficient scissor-jack-damper configurations, were analyzed using SAP2000. The high efficiency of the proposed scissor-jack-damper configuration is thus verified for practical engineering situations.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent years, damping devices or energy dissipation systems have been widely used to dissipate the large amounts of earthquake-induced energy that would be absorbed by a structural framing system via inelastic deformations [1, 2]. The underlying principle of all damping devices is to reduce or eliminate damage to structural frames. These systems exhibit either hysteretic or viscoelastic behavior [3–5].Various types of damping devices have been used in new and retrofitted constructions to reduce wind- and earthquake-induced vibrations. The diagonal-brace and chevron-brace configurations were first used to transmit forces from the energy-dissipating system to the structural frame. Subsequently, the toggle-brace configuration was developed, suitable for applications involving the reduction of wind response and the mitigation of seismic-hazard in stiff structures [6, 7]. The scissor-jack-damper energy dissipation system, a variant of the toggle-brace-damper seismic-energy-dissipating system, was developed to achieve displacement magnification and to meet architectural requirements, such as providing an open space and an unobstructed view [8–10]. Seismic design approaches of the structure with various viscous damper installation configurations were proposed in some literature studies [11, 12].With a view to improving mechanical performance, this study developed an efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration. A theory regarding the configuration is presented, and a dynamic-loading test on a steel-frame specimen was conducted to verify the theory. Moreover, the seismic response of a structure with the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration was numerically analyzed using SAP2000 and compared with the responses of an uncontrolled structure and of a structure with a diagonal-brace configuration.


## 2. Theoretical Analysis

### 2.1. Efficient Scissor-Jack-Damper Configuration

A scissor-jack damping system has the advantage of forming an open space in the bay of a structural frame, owing to its compactness and near-vertical installation. However, a concentrated load is observed to act on the beam when the structural frame is subjected to a horizontal action. This path of force transmission is suboptimal for seismic loads. In addition, the energy-dissipation efficiency of the scissor-jack-damper system is insufficient for some stiffer structures that require greater magnification factors. With this motivation, an efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration was developed. This modified scissor-jack-damper system has a significantly higher efficiency to suit stiffer structures. As illustrated in Figure1, the configuration is connected to the column-beam joint instead of the beam, which facilitates load transfer.Figure 1
Efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration.


### 2.2. Theoretical Analysis on the Efficient Scissor-Jack-Damper System

Similar to other damper installation configurations (including the diagonal-brace, chevron-brace, toggle-brace, and scissor-jack), the displacement magnification factorf of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration is defined as the ratio of the damper relative displacement uD to the interstory drift u where the devices are installed:(1)f=uDu.Similarly, the damping forceFD, directed along the damper axis, is related to the lateral force F acting on the frame as(2)F=f⋅FD.Consider a single-story frame structure with an efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration, an effective weightW, and a fundamental period of vibration T under elastic conditions. The force FD for the fitted linear viscous damper is given by(3)FD=C0⋅u˙D,where C0 is the damping coefficient and u˙D is the relative velocity between the ends of the damper along its axis. It follows that the damping ratio of the frame structure can be written as [6](4)β=C0⋅f2⋅g⋅T4⋅π⋅W,where g is the acceleration due to gravity. Equation (4) implies that a device with a greater magnification factor is more effective at enhancing the damping ratio.For a multistory frame structure with an efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration, the damping ratio can be expressed as [13](5)βk=Tk∑jCjfj2ϕrj2g4π∑iWiϕi2,where Tk denotes the period of vibration of the kth mode, Cj is the damping coefficient of the damping device installed in story j, fj is the magnification factor of the damping system, ϕrj is the kth mode relative displacement in story j, Wi is the reactive weight of floor level i, and ϕi is the kth mode displacement at floor i. It is straightforward to show that, for a single-story structure, ϕrj=ϕi=1 and i=j=1 so that equation (5) simplifies to equation (4).The above equations reveal that the magnification factor is a key parameter of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration. Indeed, the magnification factor is an important factor for evaluating the efficiency of damping systems, and the damping ratio is also related to the magnification factor.The motions of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration are illustrated in Figure2. It should be noted that any deformation in the frame and any reduction in height due to the rotation of the columns are neglected in the deformed configuration in Figure 2, which means that only rigid body motion is considered [14, 15].Figure 2
Analysis of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration motions.
(a)
(b)The magnification factor of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration can be expressed as [8](6)f=cosψtanθ.The relationship between the magnification factorf and angles θ and ψ, as specified in equation (6), is illustrated in Figure 3.Figure 3
Dependence of the magnification factor on the efficient scissor-jack geometry.For an efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration withθ=9.5° and ψ=40°, equation (6) predicts f = 4.58. If a viscous damper is installed in the conventional scissor-jack-damper configuration, because the scissor jack is connected to the beam, ψ can increase to as much as 70°. Then, f decreases to 2.04, which is considerably less than for the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration.Compared with the toggle-brace and scissor-jack configurations, a displacement magnification factor in the range 3.0 to 5.0 is practically achievable by the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration (i.e., where the damper displacement is between 3.0 and 5.0 times the interstory drift). Fluid viscous damper systems often require highly detailed designs for dealing with small drifts, which entail substantial increases in size and cost. The efficient scissor-jack configuration then becomes beneficial and significantly economical in cases involving small interstory drifts in some stiff structures [16, 17].


## 2.1. Efficient Scissor-Jack-Damper Configuration

A scissor-jack damping system has the advantage of forming an open space in the bay of a structural frame, owing to its compactness and near-vertical installation. However, a concentrated load is observed to act on the beam when the structural frame is subjected to a horizontal action. This path of force transmission is suboptimal for seismic loads. In addition, the energy-dissipation efficiency of the scissor-jack-damper system is insufficient for some stiffer structures that require greater magnification factors. With this motivation, an efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration was developed. This modified scissor-jack-damper system has a significantly higher efficiency to suit stiffer structures. As illustrated in Figure1, the configuration is connected to the column-beam joint instead of the beam, which facilitates load transfer.Figure 1
Efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration.


## 2.2. Theoretical Analysis on the Efficient Scissor-Jack-Damper System

Similar to other damper installation configurations (including the diagonal-brace, chevron-brace, toggle-brace, and scissor-jack), the displacement magnification factorf of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration is defined as the ratio of the damper relative displacement uD to the interstory drift u where the devices are installed:(1)f=uDu.Similarly, the damping forceFD, directed along the damper axis, is related to the lateral force F acting on the frame as(2)F=f⋅FD.Consider a single-story frame structure with an efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration, an effective weightW, and a fundamental period of vibration T under elastic conditions. The force FD for the fitted linear viscous damper is given by(3)FD=C0⋅u˙D,where C0 is the damping coefficient and u˙D is the relative velocity between the ends of the damper along its axis. It follows that the damping ratio of the frame structure can be written as [6](4)β=C0⋅f2⋅g⋅T4⋅π⋅W,where g is the acceleration due to gravity. Equation (4) implies that a device with a greater magnification factor is more effective at enhancing the damping ratio.For a multistory frame structure with an efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration, the damping ratio can be expressed as [13](5)βk=Tk∑jCjfj2ϕrj2g4π∑iWiϕi2,where Tk denotes the period of vibration of the kth mode, Cj is the damping coefficient of the damping device installed in story j, fj is the magnification factor of the damping system, ϕrj is the kth mode relative displacement in story j, Wi is the reactive weight of floor level i, and ϕi is the kth mode displacement at floor i. It is straightforward to show that, for a single-story structure, ϕrj=ϕi=1 and i=j=1 so that equation (5) simplifies to equation (4).The above equations reveal that the magnification factor is a key parameter of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration. Indeed, the magnification factor is an important factor for evaluating the efficiency of damping systems, and the damping ratio is also related to the magnification factor.The motions of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration are illustrated in Figure2. It should be noted that any deformation in the frame and any reduction in height due to the rotation of the columns are neglected in the deformed configuration in Figure 2, which means that only rigid body motion is considered [14, 15].Figure 2
Analysis of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration motions.
(a)
(b)The magnification factor of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration can be expressed as [8](6)f=cosψtanθ.The relationship between the magnification factorf and angles θ and ψ, as specified in equation (6), is illustrated in Figure 3.Figure 3
Dependence of the magnification factor on the efficient scissor-jack geometry.For an efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration withθ=9.5° and ψ=40°, equation (6) predicts f = 4.58. If a viscous damper is installed in the conventional scissor-jack-damper configuration, because the scissor jack is connected to the beam, ψ can increase to as much as 70°. Then, f decreases to 2.04, which is considerably less than for the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration.Compared with the toggle-brace and scissor-jack configurations, a displacement magnification factor in the range 3.0 to 5.0 is practically achievable by the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration (i.e., where the damper displacement is between 3.0 and 5.0 times the interstory drift). Fluid viscous damper systems often require highly detailed designs for dealing with small drifts, which entail substantial increases in size and cost. The efficient scissor-jack configuration then becomes beneficial and significantly economical in cases involving small interstory drifts in some stiff structures [16, 17].


## 3. Experiment on the Efficient Scissor-Jack-Damper System

### 3.1. Test on the Fluid Viscous Damper

To verify the accuracy of equation (5), a single-story steel-frame specimen was constructed with the proposed scissor-jack configuration and tested experimentally. A fluid viscous damper was utilized for the testing, parameterized by C0=43.6N⋅s/mm for a velocity up to 500 mm/s. The damper had a stroke of ±50mm. The fluid viscous damper was first tested under a harmonic load [18], as shown in Figure 4. The displacement amplitudes of the loadings were 2, 4, and 6 mm, and loading frequencies were 1, 2, 3, and 4 Hz, giving a total of 12 loading conditions. A selection of test results is shown in Figure 5. The damping force-displacement hysteresis curves are very full, indicating that the damper has a good dissipation capacity. Moreover, for small displacements and frequencies, the damping force-displacement hysteresis curve of the damper is nearly rectangular, in accordance with the hysteresis curve expected of a typical nonlinear viscous damper.Figure 4
Testing a fluid viscous damper. (a) Fluid viscous damper. (b) Loading on a fluid viscous damper.
(a)
(b)Figure 5
Hysteresis loops for the damper under different amplitude and frequency conditions. (a) 2 mm-3 Hz. (b) 2 mm-4 Hz. (c) 4 mm-1 Hz. (d) 4 mm-2 Hz.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.2. Experimental Program

The specimen geometry shown in Figure6 was a half-scale steel-frame structure model. The frame spanned 2.5 m in length and 1.9 m in height. H-shaped steel of HM200×150×6×9 was used for the column and beam, and a square steel tube of 50×50×10 was used for the connection rod. The steel specification and size can be referred to Chinese Standard [19]. The thicknesses of the joint and stiffened plates were all 10 mm. All the steel used was Q235 [19]. The ends of the beam were bolted to the columns, forming simple connections. Moreover, the scissor jack was connected to the frame by steel plates designed to undergo mainly rotation and to prevent inelastic action.Figure 6
Details of the tested efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration.An electro-hydraulic servo actuator, manufactured by the company American MTS, was employed to exert sinusoidal displacement excitations of various frequencies and amplitudes at the beam-column connection, as shown in Figure7. The amplitudes were 2, 4, and 6 mm, and the loading frequencies were 0.01, 0.05, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 Hz. The frequencies 0.01 and 0.05 Hz were considered to represent quasi-static conditions, while the other frequencies represented dynamic conditions. The horizontal displacement at the joint, the relative displacement of the damper, the displacement of the foundation beam, the output force of the actuator, and the damper force were recorded during the experiment [20].Figure 7
Test setup.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.3. Test Result Analysis

The behavior of the efficient scissor-jack-damper system is illustrated in Figures8–10. These figures show, respectively, the relationships between the lateral force and the lateral displacement of the specimen, between the damper force and the damper displacement, and between the damper displacement and the specimen lateral displacement. Notably, the specimen lateral displacement is the displacement of the beam-column joint, and the lateral force is the applied force. A rightward drift (i.e., resulting in a decrease in the damper length) is taken as corresponding to a positive force acting on the specimen and to a negative damper force.Figure 8
Load-displacement hysteresis curves for the specimen. (a) 2 mm. (b) 4 mm. (c) 6 mm.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 9
Hysteresis curves for the viscous damper.Figure 10
Damper displacement-lateral displacement hysteresis curves. (a) 2 mm. (b) 4 mm. (c) 6 mm.
(a)
(b)
(c)The curves in Figures8–10 are all symmetrical as a result of the small loading displacements and of the absence of slipping in the bolt holes. The lateral force-lateral displacement loops shown in Figure 8 reveal the stiffness and damping characteristics of the tested model. Figure 8 shows that, for a given amplitude, the lateral force-lateral displacement curves become full with increasing loading frequency, which indicates that the fluid viscous damper dissipates more energy at higher frequencies. It is clearly demonstrated that the fluid viscous damper has almost no effect at 0.01 Hz loading frequency, and there is essentially no force acting on the damper. Thus, the frame effectively displays undamped behavior under quasi-static conditions at 0.01 Hz and 0.05 Hz.For the tested model (θ=10° and ψ=38°), the theoretical prediction of the magnification factor is f=cosψ/tanθ=4.469. The damper displacement-lateral displacement hysteresis curves presented in Figure 10 display the effect of the underlying magnification factors. The measured displacement magnification factors were determined as the ratio of the damper peak displacement to the specimen peak lateral displacement, listed in Table 1. The magnification factor is maximized under the quasi-static condition (0.01 Hz), when the damper force is practically zero, and decreases with increasing frequency. It is concluded that the measurements show good agreement with the predictions of equation (5), especially at low loading frequencies. This verifies the accuracy of equation (5).Table 1
Test results for the displacement magnification factors.
Frequency (Hz)
Displacement amplitude (mm)
2
4
6
0.01
4.560
4.595
4.612
0.05
4.465
4.548
4.587
0.5
4.453
4.460
4.562
1
4.436
4.440
4.442
2
4.415
4.422
4.428
3
4.391
4.401
4.405
4
4.320
4.337
4.352


## 3.1. Test on the Fluid Viscous Damper

To verify the accuracy of equation (5), a single-story steel-frame specimen was constructed with the proposed scissor-jack configuration and tested experimentally. A fluid viscous damper was utilized for the testing, parameterized by C0=43.6N⋅s/mm for a velocity up to 500 mm/s. The damper had a stroke of ±50mm. The fluid viscous damper was first tested under a harmonic load [18], as shown in Figure 4. The displacement amplitudes of the loadings were 2, 4, and 6 mm, and loading frequencies were 1, 2, 3, and 4 Hz, giving a total of 12 loading conditions. A selection of test results is shown in Figure 5. The damping force-displacement hysteresis curves are very full, indicating that the damper has a good dissipation capacity. Moreover, for small displacements and frequencies, the damping force-displacement hysteresis curve of the damper is nearly rectangular, in accordance with the hysteresis curve expected of a typical nonlinear viscous damper.Figure 4
Testing a fluid viscous damper. (a) Fluid viscous damper. (b) Loading on a fluid viscous damper.
(a)
(b)Figure 5
Hysteresis loops for the damper under different amplitude and frequency conditions. (a) 2 mm-3 Hz. (b) 2 mm-4 Hz. (c) 4 mm-1 Hz. (d) 4 mm-2 Hz.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.2. Experimental Program

The specimen geometry shown in Figure6 was a half-scale steel-frame structure model. The frame spanned 2.5 m in length and 1.9 m in height. H-shaped steel of HM200×150×6×9 was used for the column and beam, and a square steel tube of 50×50×10 was used for the connection rod. The steel specification and size can be referred to Chinese Standard [19]. The thicknesses of the joint and stiffened plates were all 10 mm. All the steel used was Q235 [19]. The ends of the beam were bolted to the columns, forming simple connections. Moreover, the scissor jack was connected to the frame by steel plates designed to undergo mainly rotation and to prevent inelastic action.Figure 6
Details of the tested efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration.An electro-hydraulic servo actuator, manufactured by the company American MTS, was employed to exert sinusoidal displacement excitations of various frequencies and amplitudes at the beam-column connection, as shown in Figure7. The amplitudes were 2, 4, and 6 mm, and the loading frequencies were 0.01, 0.05, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 Hz. The frequencies 0.01 and 0.05 Hz were considered to represent quasi-static conditions, while the other frequencies represented dynamic conditions. The horizontal displacement at the joint, the relative displacement of the damper, the displacement of the foundation beam, the output force of the actuator, and the damper force were recorded during the experiment [20].Figure 7
Test setup.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.3. Test Result Analysis

The behavior of the efficient scissor-jack-damper system is illustrated in Figures8–10. These figures show, respectively, the relationships between the lateral force and the lateral displacement of the specimen, between the damper force and the damper displacement, and between the damper displacement and the specimen lateral displacement. Notably, the specimen lateral displacement is the displacement of the beam-column joint, and the lateral force is the applied force. A rightward drift (i.e., resulting in a decrease in the damper length) is taken as corresponding to a positive force acting on the specimen and to a negative damper force.Figure 8
Load-displacement hysteresis curves for the specimen. (a) 2 mm. (b) 4 mm. (c) 6 mm.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 9
Hysteresis curves for the viscous damper.Figure 10
Damper displacement-lateral displacement hysteresis curves. (a) 2 mm. (b) 4 mm. (c) 6 mm.
(a)
(b)
(c)The curves in Figures8–10 are all symmetrical as a result of the small loading displacements and of the absence of slipping in the bolt holes. The lateral force-lateral displacement loops shown in Figure 8 reveal the stiffness and damping characteristics of the tested model. Figure 8 shows that, for a given amplitude, the lateral force-lateral displacement curves become full with increasing loading frequency, which indicates that the fluid viscous damper dissipates more energy at higher frequencies. It is clearly demonstrated that the fluid viscous damper has almost no effect at 0.01 Hz loading frequency, and there is essentially no force acting on the damper. Thus, the frame effectively displays undamped behavior under quasi-static conditions at 0.01 Hz and 0.05 Hz.For the tested model (θ=10° and ψ=38°), the theoretical prediction of the magnification factor is f=cosψ/tanθ=4.469. The damper displacement-lateral displacement hysteresis curves presented in Figure 10 display the effect of the underlying magnification factors. The measured displacement magnification factors were determined as the ratio of the damper peak displacement to the specimen peak lateral displacement, listed in Table 1. The magnification factor is maximized under the quasi-static condition (0.01 Hz), when the damper force is practically zero, and decreases with increasing frequency. It is concluded that the measurements show good agreement with the predictions of equation (5), especially at low loading frequencies. This verifies the accuracy of equation (5).Table 1
Test results for the displacement magnification factors.
Frequency (Hz)
Displacement amplitude (mm)
2
4
6
0.01
4.560
4.595
4.612
0.05
4.465
4.548
4.587
0.5
4.453
4.460
4.562
1
4.436
4.440
4.442
2
4.415
4.422
4.428
3
4.391
4.401
4.405
4
4.320
4.337
4.352


## 4. Numerical Analysis

To examine the damping performance of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration in the context of practical engineering, three numerical models were constructed and analyzed using SAP2000 [21]. These three models all involve seven-story and three-span plane steel-frame structures, as outlined in Figure 11. The structural system is a moment-resisting frame, and the beam-to-column joint is rigid and of full strength. A linear elastic model was used for the steel frame. The steel frame is a plane model, and the panel zone was not modelled, but the dead load and live load acted on the panel were equivalent to the beam. The story heights are 3.6 m, and the span is 6 m. The column sections are HW450×450×14×22 from the first to the third floor and HW400×400×13×21 from the fourth to the seventh floor. The beam sections are HN400×200×8×13 from the first to the third floor and HN400×200×7×11 from the fourth to the seventh floor. The dead load on the frame beam is 25.2 kN/m, and the live load is 12 kN/m. Model I is an uncontrolled structure, model II is a frame structure with a diagonal-brace configuration, and model III is a frame structure with the proposed scissor-jack-damper configuration. The diagonal-brace configuration has θ=30.9° and f=cosθ=0.858; the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration has θ=12°, ψ=33.7°, and f=cosψ/tanθ=3.914. The same viscous dampers with a damping coefficient of C0=1200N⋅s/mm were utilized in models II and III.Figure 11
Numerical models. (a) Model I. (b) Model II. (c) Model III.
(a)
(b)
(c)Modal analysis was first conducted, and then linear time-history analysis of these three models was conducted under the El-Centro NS seismic wave. In accordance with the code requirements [22], the peak acceleration for the El-Centro NS seismic wave was adjusted to 70 cm/s2, the frequent-occurred earthquake intensity level. The interstory shear force and drift are presented in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The displacement of each floor and the displacement response of the top floor are plotted in Figure 12. The seismic-reduction ratio, specified in Tables 2 and 3, is defined as the ratio of the difference between the seismic responses of the uncontrolled and controlled structures to the response of the uncontrolled structure. Tables 2 and 3 and Figure 12 suggest that the seismic response of the controlled structure is less than that of the uncontrolled structures. Especially for the model with the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration, the seismic response is significantly reduced, with the seismic-reduction ratio reaching 55% to 65%. Furthermore, it is noted that the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration is more efficient than the diagonal-brace configuration.Table 2
Interstory shear force under the El-Centro NS seismic wave.
Floor
Model I
Model II
Model III
Interstory shear force (kN)
Interstory shear force (kN)
Seismic-reduction ratio
Interstory shear force (kN)
Seismic-reduction ratio
7
67
49
26.9
20
70.1
6
96
72
25.0
34
64.6
5
109
86
21.1
41
62.4
4
117
93
20.5
52
55.6
3
132
106
19.7
56
57.6
2
157
123
21.7
62
60.5
1
192
146
24.0
69
64.1Table 3
Interstory drift under the El-Centro NS seismic wave.
Floor
Model I
Model II
Model III
Interstory drift
Interstory drift
Seismic-reduction ratio
Interstory drift
Seismic-reduction ratio (%)
7
1/957
1/1247
23.3
1/2647
63.8
6
1/787
1/1002
21.5
1/1946
59.6
5
1/752
1/935
19.6
1/1779
57.7
4
1/735
1/893
17.7
1/1593
53.9
3
1/748
1/935
20.0
1/1680
55.5
2
1/791
1/971
18.5
1/1849
57.2
1
1/910
1/1149
20.8
1/2233
59.2Figure 12
Displacement response under the El-Centro NS seismic wave. (a) Lateral displacement. (b) Top-floor displacement.
(a)
(b)Linear time-history analysis of these three models under the Taft seismic wave and the Lanzhou artificial seismic wave was also done. In these earthquake ground motion conditions, the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration all showed good damping performance. Considering the purpose of the numerical analysis, only one steel-frame structure was employed, which would not affect the generality of analysis conclusions.


## 5. Conclusions

In conclusions, this paper presented a modified scissor-jack-damper configuration with a substantially improved efficiency. A theoretical analysis, an experimental investigation, and a numerical analysis on the configuration were conducted, supporting the following conclusions:(1)
The efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration increases the displacement magnification factor significantly, which is beneficial for the load transfer of earthquake action.(2)
The formula for the displacement magnification factor for the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration was derived theoretically, and its accuracy was verified experimentally.(3)
Numerical models were linear, and beam-to-column joints were rigid and of full strength. Linear time-history analysis results show that a structure with the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration has a good energy-dissipation capacity and seismic-mitigation ability, thereby verifying the suitability of the efficient scissor-jack-damper configuration for practical engineering situations.



---

*Source: 2403640-2020-03-16.xml*