# Performance Analysis of Multihop Relaying Caching for Internet of Things under Nakagami Channels

Authors: Baofeng Ji; Bingbing Xing; Kang Song; Chunguo Li; Hong Wen; Luxi Yang
Journal: Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Performance analysis is studied in this paper for the wireless transmissions in Internet of Things (IoT) system, where both the direct link and the multihop relaying caching wireless transmission from the source node to the destination node are taken into the consideration. The key feature is the Nakagami channels of the wireless channel from the source node to the destination node, which results in the difficulty of the theoretical analysis over the system performance. To tackle this difficulty, the probability distribution function (PDF) of the received signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the destination node is derived by exploiting the function and integral properties. Then, the outage probability and bit error rate (BER) of the whole wireless IoT system are derived in the analytical expression without any approximation. Numerical simulations demonstrate the accuracy of the derived theoretical analysis for this system.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Internet of Things (IoT) becomes very import since it can support the requirement from the fifth generation (5G) of the cellular transmission. For instance, IoT can serve massive access nodes for wireless service in the scenario of the ultradense networks (UDN) in 5G [1–4]. It is shown that there are as many as over three thousands of papers in IEEE exploring over the study of IoT, where the number of the journal papers is over six hundreds. For example, RFID as IoT enabler is reviewed in [5] from both the physical layer and MAC layer point of review, where the SDR (soft defined radio) platform is utilized to guarantee the time delay of the tag identification. In [6], the performance of employee is evaluated automatically by the proposed game theories, where the data is collected by the sensory nodes in IoT systems. Three deployment patterns of the industrial IoT are theoretically discussed by the authors from [7] for the cognitive access in IoT. The cost and the performance tradeoff are demonstrated in [8–10] for selecting the platform in IoT, where the CUP, GPU, and FPGA are taken into the consideration for the computer vision. In [11], the smart manufacturing with real-time traceability is studied in [11] which is enabled by IoT, where the authors propose a production performance analysis and exception diagnosis model. The authors in [12] review the channel access protocols for IoT system, where the ALOHA method is discussed in detail. All of these research results show that IoT have potential good performance for wireless performance especially in 5G cellular systems. However, there is no study on the outage probability analysis over IoT where the wireless channel from the source node to the destination node is distributed with the Nakagami.There are extensive results over the performance analysis in existing wireless communication systems especially in the multihop relaying system without involving IoT technology. The multihop system with cooperative relay is usually named as multihop cooperative relay systems (MCRSs). Compared to traditional networks, MCRSs have a lot of advantages such as the connectivity improvement and the capacity enhancement. In multihop wireless communications, many relay stations assist the source terminal to transmit signal to the destination terminal, which reduces the transmit power and improves the wireless link reliability especially for the scenario of the long-distance between the source and the destination [6–13]. The amplify-and-forward relaying protocol is studied in [13] for the multihop and multibranch wireless cooperative systems with nonregenerative fixed gain at the relay station. In [14], the outage probability and the bit error rate are analyzed theoretically for MCRSs over Nakagami-m fading channels, where the approximated expression is derived in closed form. The asymptotic performance is analyzed in [15] for the bit error rate in the multihop relaying caching networks, where each hop of the wireless channel is distributed with Generalized-K. These studies are applicable to the amplify-and-forward (AF) relaying protocol. A method is proposed in [16] which is based on the generalized transformed characteristic function (GTCF) for the AF multihop relaying system. A statistical-theorem-based approach is proposed to analyze the performance of multihop relaying system in [17]. For the decode-and-relaying protocol, the ergodic capacity is theoretically analyzed in [18–20]. It is discovered from [19] that the fixed AF relaying method outperforms the other relaying methods such as the fixed DF and the selective DF. All these studies are suitable for one-way relaying protocol, where the two-way relaying protocol is examined in [20] by deriving the expression to the outage probability. The dual-hop wireless communication system has been theoretically analyzed in [21–23], where performance analysis is derived for different assumptions. However, all of these results cannot be applied to the more general scenario where the wireless channel is distributed with the Nakagami, where the goal is to obtain the accurate expression without approximation for the target performance such as the outage probability and the bit error rate.With the fifth generation mobile communication (5G), the Internet of Things (IoT) technology becomes more and more important since IoT can provide many attractive improvements to 5G. The IoT-based wireless communications typically employ the relaying technique which can enlarge the coverage of the wireless communications. For instance, the mobile terminal in the vehicle-based relaying system transmits signals to the base station via the multihop relaying retransmission [24]. A dual interface relay is designed to improve the power efficiency of the IoT-based wireless sensor networks; it is proved in [25] that the relaying technology reduces the outage probability in the energy harvesting IoT-based wireless networks while decreasing the feedback cost from the receive node to the transmit node. Thus, it is interesting to study the performance analysis over the relaying based IoT wireless transmissions.In this paper, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) from the source to the destination is derived in the closed form for the IoT wireless communications. Moreover, the outage probability and the bit error rate are theoretically analyzed by deriving the analytical expression via exploiting the probability properties. The key feature is that all wireless links are distributed with Nakagami-m from the source node to the destination node. The final expression over the outage probability is exact without any approximation for the studied IoT wireless system.The rest of this paper is organized as follows. The system model is introduced in Section2 for the IoT multihop relaying wireless communications with the existence of the direct wireless link from the source to the destination node. In Section 3, the probability density function (PDF) of multihop relaying link is derived exactly in an analytical expression. Moreover, the outage probability and the bit error rate are derived by exploiting the probability properties, which are based on the derived PDF as mentioned above. In Section 4, the numerical simulations are plotted to show the effectiveness of the obtained theoretical analysis. Section 5 concludes the whole paper.


## 2. System Model

The considered system consisting of one source node, one destination, andN¯-1 relay nodes as shown in Figure 1. In the first time slot, the source node transmits the signal to the first relay node. Meanwhile, the destination also receives the signal from the source node by the wireless channel, which is usually ignored by most of the existing methods in this literature. In the n¯th (n¯=2,3,…,N¯-1) time slot, the n¯-1th relay node first amplifies the received caching signal and the retransmits it to the n¯th relay node. Finally, the N¯th relay node amplifies the received caching signal and forwards it to the destination in the N¯th time slot. At the destination, the receiver receives two branches of the signals, respectively, from the source node directly and from the relay nodes via multihop caching technology. The maximal-ratio combining (MRC) is employed at the destination node to combine these two branches, which maximizes the signal-to-noise ratio at the destination. It is assumed that the channel is slow fading or block fading in the multihop IoT networks.Figure 1
Illustration of a multihop cooperative relay network.In the first time slot, the source node as the transmitter in IoT wireless networks sends the signal via the wireless channel to the destination node directly. The received signalyD at the destination node D is then given by(1)yD=PShs+n,where PS is the transmission power of the source terminal, h denotes the channel matrix from transmitting antenna of source terminal to receiving antenna of the destination terminal, and the channel h follows Nakagami-m distribution and the norm of channel h, which means that the signal with shadowing effect can be approximated by a gamma distribution as fh2x=1/Γλλ/Ωλxλ-1e-λ/Ωx,x>0. s is the source transmitted signal, n is additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) at the destination, and n~CN(0,σn2).In the following time slots, the relay node amplifies the received caching signal and then forwards it to the next relay node. The received caching signaly1 at the 1th relay terminal can be described as(2)y1=PSh1s+n1,where h1 denotes the channel matrix from transmitting antenna of source terminal to the receiving antenna of 1th relay terminal, s is the source transmitted signal, n1 is additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) at the 1th relay terminal, and n1~CN(0,σN2). In order to satisfy the requirements of relay transmission power, the signal receiving energy is normalized at the relay (divided by ρ=PSh122+σn2) and amplified at the current relay node with the factor wr, wr=Pr. It is noting that the channel parameter follows Nakagami distribution, where every signal is subject to independent path loss, shadowing, and Nakagami fading effect. The reasons to choose the Nakagami-m channels in the paper are as follows.(1) Nakagami-m channel characteristic can conform practical experience data more exactly than Rayleigh and Rice channel; it is worth noting that Nakagami-m channel can accurately feature terrestrial wireless communication channel, indoor mobile communication channel, and other wireless multipath fading channels [26].(2) Nakagami-m channel can be equivalent to other wireless multipath fading channels with different parameter m∈1/2,∞, which present that Nakagami-m channel can cover other fading channels generally. In other words, Nakagami channel model has become a general channel model and thus has a high application value.(3)Nakagami-mchannel⟹Unilateral Gaussian channel,m=12Rayleigh channel,m=1Nakagami-n,m=1+n221+2n2,n≥0Ricechannel,K=n2=m2-mm-m2-m,m≥1Constant channel,m=∞.Thus, the transmitting caching signal of 1th relay node is expressed as(4)t=wrρy1.Similarly, the receiving signal of 2th relay node is given by(5)y2=h2·t+n2=h2wrρy1+n2=h2wrρPsh1s+h2wrρn1+n2,where h2 is the channel matrix from the transmit antenna of 1th relay node to the receive antenna of 2th relay node and n2 is additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) at the 2th relay node and n2~CN0,σn2. In this way, the signal received at the n¯+1th (n¯≤N¯) relay node is expressed as(6)yn¯=hn¯wrρyn¯-1+nn¯=wrρn¯-1hn¯hn¯-1⋯h1Pss+wrρn¯-1hn¯hn¯-1⋯h2n1+wrρn¯-2hn¯hn¯-1⋯h3n2+⋯+wrρhn¯nn¯-1+nn¯,where hn¯,hn¯-1,…,h1 are the wireless channel vectors, nn¯,nn¯-1,…,n1 is the AWGN noise received at the corresponding relay node, and nn¯~CN(0,σn2),…,n1~CN(0,σn2).


## 3. Performance Analysis for IoT-Based Multihop Caching

In this section, the signal-to-noise ratio is analyzed theoretically by deriving the corresponding probability density function (PDF), where the goal is to obtain the closed form expression. Then, the outage probability and the bit error rate are derived by utilizing the integration properties.For the destination, there are two branches of the received signals that are directly from the source node and from the multihop caching node. With the signal arrived at the destination node from the multihop relaying caching link [27], the PDF of the corresponding SNR over the multihop caching link is given by(7)fMulthopy=∂1-∏n¯=1N¯1-Γmn¯,mn¯y/γ¯n¯/Γmn¯∂y,where symbol ∂(·) is the derivation to variables and the function Γ(·,·) is Gamma function and defined as Γ(z)=∫0∞e-ttz-1dt [28], which can be sorted as(8)Γmn¯,mn¯yγ¯n¯=Γmn¯·e-mn¯y/γ¯n¯·∑j=0mn¯-1j!mn¯yγ¯n¯j.It can be mentioned that the parameterm needs to calculate in the form of integer in order to derive conveniently. By inserting (8), we have that(9)fMultihopy=-∂∏n¯=1N¯1-e-mn¯y/γ¯n¯·∑j=0mn¯-1j!mn¯y/γ¯n¯j∂y.It is seen from (9) that the multiplication is involved in many terms, which makes the following derivations intractable. Thus, we propose to express (9) into another form equivalently, where the term involving the multiplication operation in (9) is derived as(10)∏n¯=1N¯1-e-mn¯y/γ¯n¯·∑j=0mn¯-1j!mn¯yγ¯n¯j=∑t=0N¯∑b1b2⋯bt∈a1a2⋯aN¯;∀k,l∈1,2,…,t,bk≠bl-1tb1b2⋯bt.In order to expressed clearly and simply, it can be denoted thatb1b2⋯bt∈a1a2⋯aN¯;∀k,l∈1,2,…,t,bk≠bl as ℧, where (·)! is the factorial of variables and b1b2⋯bt can be expressed as follows:(11)b1=e-m1y/γ¯1·∑j=0m1-1j!m1yγ¯1jb2=e-m2y/γ¯2·∑j=0m2-1j!m2yγ¯2j⋮bt=e-mty/γ¯t·∑j=0mt-1j!mtyγ¯tj.By substituting (10) and (11) into (9), we have the expression of the PDF for the received SNR via the multihop relaying link as(12)fMultihopy=∂∑t=0N¯∑℧∑j1=0m1-1∑j2=0m2-1⋯∑jt=0mt-1m1/γ¯1j1⋯mt/γ¯tjt·y∑q=1tjq/-1t+1·ey·∑p=1tmp/γ¯p·j1!⋯jt!∂y=∑t=0N¯∑℧∑j1=0m1-1∑j2=0m2-1⋯∑jt=0mt-1m1/γ¯1j1⋯mt/γ¯tjt-1t+1·j1!⋯jt!·y-1+∑q=1tjq·e-y·∑p=1tmp/γ¯p·∑q=1tjq-∑p=1tmpγ¯p·y∑q=1tjq·e-y·∑p=1tmp/γ¯p.With (12) as the PDF of the received SNR at the destination from the multihop caching link as well as the Nakagami distribution of the direct wireless channel from the source to the destination, the total SNR received at the destination node after the MRC receiver can be expressed as(13)
f
z
z
=
∫
0
z
f
X
x
f
Y
z
-
x
d
x
=
1
Γ
λ
λ
Ω
λ
∑
s
=
0
λ
-
1
C
λ
-
1
s
z
λ
-
1
-
s
-
1
s
e
-
λ
/
Ω
z
∫
0
z
f
X
x
·
e
λ
/
Ω
x
·
x
s
d
x
=
λ
λ
·
e
-
λ
/
Ω
z
·
C
λ
-
1
s
-
1
s
+
t
+
1
Γ
λ
Ω
λ
z
1
+
s
-
λ
∑
s
=
0
λ
-
1
∑
t
=
0
N
¯
∑
℧
∑
j
1
=
0
m
1
-
1
∑
j
2
=
0
m
2
-
1
⋯
∑
j
t
=
0
m
t
-
1
m
1
/
γ
¯
1
j
1
⋯
m
t
/
γ
¯
t
j
t
j
1
!
⋯
j
t
!
·
∫
0
z
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
x
-
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
e
-
x
·
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
·
e
λ
/
Ω
x
·
x
s
d
x
-
∫
0
z
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
·
x
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
e
-
x
·
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
·
e
λ
/
Ω
x
·
x
s
d
x
=
λ
λ
·
e
-
λ
/
Ω
z
Γ
λ
Ω
λ
∑
s
=
0
λ
-
1
C
λ
-
1
s
z
λ
-
1
-
s
-
1
s
∑
t
=
0
N
¯
∑
℧
-
1
t
+
1
∑
j
1
=
0
m
1
-
1
∑
j
2
=
0
m
2
-
1
⋯
∑
j
t
=
0
m
t
-
1
1
j
1
!
⋯
j
t
!
m
1
γ
¯
1
j
1
⋯
m
t
γ
¯
t
j
t
·
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
-
λ
Ω
-
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
+
s
·
γ
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
+
s
,
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
-
λ
Ω
·
z
-
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
·
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
-
λ
Ω
-
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
γ
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
,
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
-
λ
Ω
·
z
.The parameter lambda is the shadowing effect value and can be expressed asλ=1/eσdB/8.6862-1, where σdB is the shadow spread parameter expressed in decibels whose value usually ranges from 4 to 9 in practice. The Γ(λ) can be expressed as Γλ=∫0∞tλ-1e-tdt, where symbol C is for“Combination.” A combination is an unordered collection of distinct elements and usually of a prescribed size and taken from a given set such as Cnr=n!/r!n-r! (! denotes factorial). It is observed that there are two terms involving the incomplete gamma function and the expression can be derived using some manipulations [28] as(14)γ∑q=1tjq+s,∑p=1tmpγ¯p-λΩ·z=Γ∑q=1tjq+s·1-∑k=0∑q=1tjq+s∑p=1tmp/γ¯p-λ/Ωk·zke∑p=1tmp/γ¯p-λ/Ω·zk!.γs+1+∑q=1tjq,∑p=1tmpγ¯p-λΩ·z=Γs+1+∑q=1tjq·1-∑l=0s+1+∑q=1tjq∑p=1tmp/γ¯p-λ/Ωl·zle∑p=1tmp/γ¯p-λ/Ω·z·l!By substituting (14) into (13), we can obtain the outage probability expression of the received SNR at the destination node after the MRC receiver as(15)
P
o
u
t
η
t
h
=
λ
λ
C
λ
-
1
s
z
λ
-
1
-
s
-
1
s
+
t
+
1
Γ
λ
Ω
λ
∑
s
=
0
λ
-
1
∑
t
=
0
N
¯
∑
℧
∑
j
1
=
0
m
1
-
1
∑
j
2
=
0
m
2
-
1
⋯
∑
j
t
=
0
m
t
-
1
m
1
/
γ
¯
1
j
1
⋯
m
t
/
γ
¯
t
j
t
j
1
!
⋯
j
t
!
·
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
-
λ
Ω
-
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
+
s
·
Γ
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
+
s
·
∫
0
η
t
h
e
-
λ
/
Ω
z
-
e
-
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
·
z
·
∑
k
=
0
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
+
s
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
k
·
z
k
k
!
-
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
·
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
-
λ
Ω
-
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
Γ
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
∫
0
η
t
h
e
-
λ
/
Ω
z
-
e
-
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
·
z
·
∑
l
=
0
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
l
·
z
l
l
!
=
λ
λ
C
λ
-
1
s
z
λ
-
1
-
s
-
1
s
+
t
+
1
Γ
λ
Ω
λ
∑
s
=
0
λ
-
1
∑
t
=
0
N
∑
℧
∑
j
1
=
0
m
1
-
1
∑
j
2
=
0
m
2
-
1
⋯
∑
j
t
=
0
m
t
-
1
m
1
/
γ
¯
1
j
1
⋯
m
t
/
γ
¯
t
j
t
j
1
!
⋯
j
t
!
·
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
Γ
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
+
s
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
+
s
·
Ω
λ
1
-
e
-
λ
/
Ω
η
t
h
-
∑
k
=
0
s
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
k
k
!
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
k
+
1
·
γ
k
+
1
,
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
·
η
t
h
-
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
·
Γ
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
Ω
λ
1
-
e
-
λ
/
Ω
η
t
h
-
∑
l
=
0
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
l
l
!
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
l
+
1
·
γ
k
+
1
,
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
·
η
t
h
.Based on (15), the bit error rate of the whole system can be expressed as(16)PBER=EQvγ=v22π∫0∞e-v/2xxFxdx,where the function Q(·) is the Gaussian tail function and v is the modulation mode in the transmission process; for example, v=1 represents the BFSK modulation and v=2 is the BPSK modulation.By substituting the CDF of received SNR into (16), we can have(17)
P
B
E
R
=
v
2
2
π
∫
0
∞
e
-
v
/
2
x
x
λ
λ
C
λ
-
1
s
z
λ
-
1
-
s
-
1
s
+
t
+
1
Γ
λ
Ω
λ
∑
s
=
0
λ
-
1
∑
t
=
0
N
¯
∑
℧
∑
j
1
=
0
m
1
-
1
∑
j
2
=
0
m
2
-
1
⋯
∑
j
t
=
0
m
t
-
1
m
1
/
γ
¯
1
j
1
⋯
m
t
/
γ
¯
t
j
t
j
1
!
⋯
j
t
!
·
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
Γ
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
+
s
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
+
s
·
Ω
λ
1
-
e
-
λ
/
Ω
η
t
h
-
∑
k
=
0
s
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
k
k
!
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
k
+
1
·
γ
k
+
1
,
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
·
η
t
h
-
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
·
Γ
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
Ω
λ
1
-
e
-
λ
/
Ω
η
t
h
-
∑
l
=
0
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
l
l
!
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
l
+
1
·
γ
k
+
1
,
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
γ
¯
p
·
η
t
h
d
x
℘
=
Ω
λ
·
2
π
v
-
π
v
/
2
+
λ
/
Ω
_
_
v
λ
λ
C
λ
-
1
s
z
λ
-
1
-
s
-
1
s
+
t
+
1
2
2
π
Γ
λ
Ω
λ
∑
s
=
0
λ
-
1
∑
t
=
0
N
∑
℧
∑
j
1
=
0
m
1
-
1
∑
j
2
=
0
m
2
-
1
⋯
∑
j
t
=
0
m
t
-
1
m
1
/
γ
¯
1
j
1
⋯
m
t
/
γ
¯
t
j
t
j
1
!
⋯
j
t
!
·
Γ
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
+
s
·
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
+
s
·
℘
-
∑
k
=
0
s
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
k
k
!
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
k
+
1
·
2
π
v
Γ
k
+
1
-
∑
r
1
=
0
k
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
r
1
·
Γ
r
1
+
1
/
2
r
1
!
·
v
/
2
+
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
r
1
+
1
/
2
-
Γ
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
·
℘
-
∑
l
=
0
s
+
1
+
∑
q
=
1
t
j
q
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
-
λ
/
Ω
l
l
!
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
l
+
1
·
2
π
v
Γ
l
+
1
-
∑
r
2
=
0
l
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
r
2
·
Γ
r
2
+
1
/
2
r
2
!
·
v
/
2
+
∑
p
=
1
t
m
p
/
γ
¯
p
r
2
+
1
/
2
.To this end, the outage probability and BER closed form analytical expression are derived in detail, which are suitable for the Nakagami channel in the transmission process. Moreover, the bit error rate is expressed in the closed form without any approximation, which is different from the existing results in this literature.


## 4. Simulation and Analysis

In this section, we present the various performance evaluation results derived by numerical and simulations with a binary phase shift keying modulation scheme. We also verify the gap between the derived theoretical results and the numerical simulations. We assume that the transmitting power of source terminal and relay terminal are the same in general. We consider that the multihop network is composed by a LoS path and three relays. The relays employ the amplify-and-forward technique and each node is equipped with only one antenna. The simulations operate over Nakagami-m fading channel with different fading parameter m. We employ the maximal-ratio combining at the destination.Figure2 plots the outage probability function versus the SNR received at the destination, where different channel distributions of the direct link from the source to the destination are simulated for the different Nakagami factor, respectively. It is shown that the derived theoretical result is very tight to the curve from the numerical simulations in the scenario of m=1,2,3 for every SNR. Thus, it is concluded that our result is very accurate from the outage probability point of view. It is mentioned that the outage probability can be decreased with the m growing, because the parameter m stands for the strength of line of sight, so the bigger the factor m, the better the system performance.Figure 2
The outage probability.Figure3 gives the bit error rate as the function of the SNR received at the destination. It is seen from Figure 3 that our derived theoretical expression is almost the same with the result from the numerical simulations in the every regime of SNR regardless of the Nakagami factor m. Thus, it is concluded that our scheme is very accurate from the BER point of view. It is worth noting that the BER of multihop network can be decreased with the relay increasing; the reason is that the relay can amplify the received signal and forward to the next node and the multiple relay can reduce the large scale fading to some extent. However, the broadcast error with relay node is not considered herein and will be our future work.Figure 3
The BER performance of the IoT network.Figure4 plots the outage probability comparison of LoS and non-LoS. It can be seen that the performance with LoS is superior to the non-LoS; the reason is that LoS can improve the received SNR and increase the diversity order for the IoT networks. Figure 5 presents the outage probability comparison with different parameter; we can see that the bigger the parameter m, the better the outage probability performance. The reason is that the parameter m represents the strength of LoS, which can result in the higher received SNR.Figure 4
The outage probability comparison of LoS and non-LoS.Figure 5
The outage probability comparison with different parameter.Figure6 shows the BER comparison with different parameter; it seems that the less relay number presents more superior BER performance; the reason is that the multihop IoT network may bring about different cases for each link; however, the IoT network may depend on the multihop relay nodes to improve the communication efficiency.Figure 6
The BER comparison with different parameter.


## 5. Conclusions

In this paper, the probability distribution function is derived in closed form expression without any approximation for the signal-to-noise ratio received at the destination node from the multihop caching link in Internet of Things system. Moreover, both the outage probability function and the bit error rate are derived in analytical expressions by exploiting the function and integration properties. The obtained results are suitable for any distribution of the wireless channel from the source directly to the destination node in IoT communications.



---

*Source: 2437361-2018-04-23.xml*