# Preparation and Characterization of Electrospun Gelatin Nanofibers for Use as Nonaqueous Electrolyte in Electric Double-Layer Capacitor

Authors: Ditpon Kotatha; Masaharu Hirata; Mayuko Ogino; Satoshi Uchida; Masashi Ishikawa; Tetsuya Furuike; Hiroshi Tamura
Journal: Journal of Nanotechnology
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

A novel nanofibrous gel electrolyte was prepared via gelatin electrospinning for use as a nonaqueous electrolyte in electric double-layer capacitors (EDLCs). An electrospinning technique with a 25 wt% gelatin solution was applied to produce gelatin electrospun (GES) nanofiber electrolytes. Structural analysis of the GES products showed a clearly nanofibrous structure with fiber diameters in the 306.2–428.4 nm range and exhibiting high thermal stability, high tensile strength, and a stable form of nanofibrous structure after immersion in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMImBF4). After testing over a range of spinning times, GES electrolytes that were produced at 25 min (GES-25) had a suitable thickness for the assembly of EDLC with the optimized tensile properties and were used to fabricate EDLC test cells with EMImBF4. These test cells were compared to those with pure EMImBF4 and a separator as an electrolyte. The electrochemical properties of the test cells were characterized by charge-discharge testing, discharge capacitance, and alternative current (AC) impedance measurements. AC impedance measurements showed that the test cell with the GES-25/EMImBF4 gel electrolyte showed slightly poorer contact with the electrode when compared to that with pure EMImBF4, whereas exhibited comparable IR drop and discharge capacitance (calculated capacitance retention was 56.6%). The results demonstrated that this novel gel electrolyte can be used as a nonaqueous electrolyte in order to improve the safety in EDLCs.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Electric double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) represent a class of energy storage devices that can store electrical energy converted from sustainable sources. They are distinguished from other energy storage devices owing to their several unique characteristics such as higher power density with a longer charge-discharge cycle (<100,000 cycles) than rechargeable batteries as well as higher energy density than conventional dielectric capacitors [1–5].Ionic liquids (ILs) are room-temperature molten salts mostly composed of organic cations and inorganic anions, which are in a liquid state below 100°C, exhibiting nearly unlimited structural diversity and physicochemical variations owing to the appropriate selection and modification of the cations and anions [6]. There are potential alternative electrolytes for EDLCs. Many researchers have been trying to use ILs as solution electrolytes in the EDLCs [7–12] due to their excellent properties such as near-zero vapor pressure, high thermal stability, and nonflammability [13–15]. Nevertheless, liquid leakage and other safety issues limit the application of ILs as electrolytes in EDLCs. Therefore, a nonaqueous electrolyte is a more attractive alternative for EDLCs.Several nonaqueous electrolytes have been proposed in recent years to satisfy the safety requirements of EDLCs [16–20]. Electrolytes based on natural polymers such as chitosan [21–23], alginate [24–26], agar [27, 28], carrageen [29–32], starch [33–35], and bacterial cellulose [36] have been widely studied. In addition to being abundant, low cost, nontoxic, and environmentally friendly, natural polymers have been reported to exhibit good physical and mechanical properties and high thermal stabilities.Gelatin is prepared by the hydrolysis of collagen, which is a natural, triple-helix macromolecule obtained from mammalian skin and bones [37, 38]. Gelatin has been widely used as a scaffold for tissue engineering owing to its excellent biodegradability, biocompatibility, ability to promote cell adhesion and proliferation, and resistance to immunogenicity [39–43]. Moreover, gelatin has the potential to be used as an electrolyte in many applications such as dye-sensitized solar cells and electrochromic devices [44–49].An important property of gelatin is its gel transition under aqueous conditions. Soluble collagen denatures because of the breakdown of hydrogen and electrostatic bonds in hot water (about 40°C). This process destroys the triple helical structure of collagen to produce one, two, or three random chain gelatin molecules that create a high viscosity solution in water [50, 51]. Gelatin is also compatible with electrospinning, which is a simple and cost-effective technique that is widely used to simply and continuously fabricate nanofibers. Electrospun fibers offer small pores, a high surface area, physical stability, and a controllable thickness in the membrane form [52–54]. Thus, electrospinning is an attractive option for fabricating gel electrolytes to apply in EDLCs.In this study, we fabricated a novel electrolyte from gelatin via an electrospinning technique. We focused on one potential application of the electrolyte in EDLCs for improved device safety. The novel gelatin electrospun (GES) nanofiber electrolyte included ionic liquid of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium (EMImBF4), which has high ionic conductivity and low viscosity and is widely used as an electrolyte in EDLCs [8–10]. The electrochemical properties of the EDLC test cells assembled with the novel electrolyte were characterized and measured with respect to the charge-discharge characteristics, discharge capacitance, and AC impedance.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Gelatin (JS200, Mw = 100,000, bovine skin type B, Lot No. 120705M) was purchased in powder form from Koei Chemical Co., Ltd (Japan), and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMImBF4, 99.0%) was purchased from Toyo Gosei Co., Ltd (Japan). Activated carbon (YP-50F), acetylene black (HS-100), sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (WS-C), and styrene-butadiene rubber (TRD2001) were purchased from Kuraray Co., Ltd (Japan), Denka company Ltd (Japan), DKS Co., Ltd (Japan), and JSR corporation (Japan), respectively.


### 2.2. Preparation of GES Electrolytes

25 wt% gelatin powder was dissolved in deionized (DI) water, and the mixture was stirred at 50°C until a homogeneous solution was obtained. The solution was maintained in a water bath at 50°C for approximately 1 h to remove entrapped air and then cooled in an ice bath to induce gelation. The gelated gelatin was placed in a 5 mL syringe with a metal needle of diameter 1.5 mm, and the syringe was placed in a water bath at 50°C to reverse the gelation; the temperature of the syringe was thereafter maintained at 45°C–50°C. A high-voltage power supply of 23 kV was connected to the syringe needle tip and to a stationary collector covered with an aluminum foil. The tip-to-collector distance was set at 7 cm. The electrospun nanofibers were collected as randomly overlaid mats on the electrically grounded plate. The spinning time was varied between 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 min. The GES samples were dried at 25°C (room temperature) under ambient conditions for 12 h before being removed from the aluminum foil; the dried sample was placed in a desiccator containing a silica-gel desiccant before being used for further testing. In addition, the selected GES sample was soaked in EMImBF4 under 0.3 Pa vacuum at room temperature for 48 h before EDLC test cells fabrication.


### 2.3. Characterization

#### 2.3.1. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR; 670-IR, VARIAN Inc., USA) was used for the identification of the functional groups in the samples. All FTIR spectra were scanned with a resolution of 0.5 cm−1 in the 4000–400 cm−1 range.


#### 2.3.2. Thermogravimetric/Differential Thermal Analysis (TG/DTA)

Thermogravimetric/differential thermal analysis was performed by a TG/DTA analyzer (EXSTAR TG/DTA6200, SII, Japan) in order to measure the thermal properties of the samples. All samples were vacuum dried at room temperature for one day before analysis. The samples were tested at a heating rate of 20°C/min in the 30°C–500°C range under a nitrogen atmosphere.


#### 2.3.3. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC; EXSTAR DSC6220, SII, Japan) was conducted using a sample in an aluminium pan that was hermetically sealed. The samples were tested at a heating rate of 20°C/min in the 30°C–350°C range under a nitrogen atmosphere.


#### 2.3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The morphologies of the obtained samples were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JSM6700, JEOL, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV with 500 × and 2000 × magnification, and the diameter and size distribution of the fibers were analyzed by using image visualization software (Image-Pro Plus).


#### 2.3.5. GES Membrane Thickness and Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of the samples were analyzed using a universal testing machine (STA-1150, A&D Company, Ltd, Japan) equipped with a 50-N load cell and elongated at a constant speed of 10 mm/min under ambient conditions. The test samples were cut to 30 mm in length and 5 mm in width and were mounted in the tensile grips spaced 10 mm apart before analysis. The thicknesses of the samples were measured by a digital micrometer (IP65, Mitutoyo, Japan).


### 2.4. Fabrication of EDLC Test Cells

Composite carbon electrodes were prepared by mixing activated carbon (YP-50F), acetylene black (HS-100) as a conductive additive, 1.2 wt% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (WS-C) as a dispersant, and 48 wt% styrene-butadiene rubber (TRD2001) as a binder in DI water at a ratio of 90 : 5:3 : 2 (w/w). The slurry was then cast onto an etched aluminium-foil current collector and dried; the obtained composite electrode sheet was cut into 12 mm diameter disks. Two carbon electrodes were immersed in EMImBF4 for 10 min in a glove box under reduced pressure while the gel electrolyte was soaked in EMImBF4 under a 0.3 Pa vacuum at room temperature for 48 h. The test cells were then assembled with the prepared carbon electrodes and gel electrolytes in a coin cell (CR2023, stainless type, Hohsen Corporation, Japan). In addition, test cells were assembled with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and a cellulose separator (TF4035, Nippon Kodoshi Corporation, Japan) for comparison. The whole assembly procedure was performed in an argon-filled glove box.


### 2.5. Measurement of Electrochemical Properties

The electrochemical properties of EDLC test cells were measured in terms of the charge-discharge characteristics, discharge capacitance, and AC impedance of each test cell. The performance was measured using a battery charge/discharge apparatus (HJ1001 SM8, Hokuto Denko Corporation, Japan). The charge-discharge tests were carried out in the voltage range from 0 to 2.5 V at various densities. The discharge rate was estimated at various discharge current densities between 2.5 and 100 mA/cm2 when a constant current was charged up to 2.5 V. The discharge capacitance of a single electrode in the EDLC symmetrical cells was determined using equation (1) [21–25]:(1)C=I×tV/2×W,where C is the discharge capacitance (F/g), I is the discharge current (A), t is the discharge time (s), V is the operating voltage (V), and W is the total mass of activated carbon in a single electrode (g).AC impedance measurements were performed using a potentiogalvanostat (SI 1287 type, Solartron Analytical, UK) and a frequency-response analyzer (SI 1260 type, Solartron Analytical, UK) with an AC amplitude of 10 mVp-0 in the frequency range of 500 kHz–10 mHz. All electrochemical measurements were performed at 25°C.


## 2.1. Materials

Gelatin (JS200, Mw = 100,000, bovine skin type B, Lot No. 120705M) was purchased in powder form from Koei Chemical Co., Ltd (Japan), and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMImBF4, 99.0%) was purchased from Toyo Gosei Co., Ltd (Japan). Activated carbon (YP-50F), acetylene black (HS-100), sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (WS-C), and styrene-butadiene rubber (TRD2001) were purchased from Kuraray Co., Ltd (Japan), Denka company Ltd (Japan), DKS Co., Ltd (Japan), and JSR corporation (Japan), respectively.


## 2.2. Preparation of GES Electrolytes

25 wt% gelatin powder was dissolved in deionized (DI) water, and the mixture was stirred at 50°C until a homogeneous solution was obtained. The solution was maintained in a water bath at 50°C for approximately 1 h to remove entrapped air and then cooled in an ice bath to induce gelation. The gelated gelatin was placed in a 5 mL syringe with a metal needle of diameter 1.5 mm, and the syringe was placed in a water bath at 50°C to reverse the gelation; the temperature of the syringe was thereafter maintained at 45°C–50°C. A high-voltage power supply of 23 kV was connected to the syringe needle tip and to a stationary collector covered with an aluminum foil. The tip-to-collector distance was set at 7 cm. The electrospun nanofibers were collected as randomly overlaid mats on the electrically grounded plate. The spinning time was varied between 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 min. The GES samples were dried at 25°C (room temperature) under ambient conditions for 12 h before being removed from the aluminum foil; the dried sample was placed in a desiccator containing a silica-gel desiccant before being used for further testing. In addition, the selected GES sample was soaked in EMImBF4 under 0.3 Pa vacuum at room temperature for 48 h before EDLC test cells fabrication.


## 2.3. Characterization

### 2.3.1. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR; 670-IR, VARIAN Inc., USA) was used for the identification of the functional groups in the samples. All FTIR spectra were scanned with a resolution of 0.5 cm−1 in the 4000–400 cm−1 range.


### 2.3.2. Thermogravimetric/Differential Thermal Analysis (TG/DTA)

Thermogravimetric/differential thermal analysis was performed by a TG/DTA analyzer (EXSTAR TG/DTA6200, SII, Japan) in order to measure the thermal properties of the samples. All samples were vacuum dried at room temperature for one day before analysis. The samples were tested at a heating rate of 20°C/min in the 30°C–500°C range under a nitrogen atmosphere.


### 2.3.3. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC; EXSTAR DSC6220, SII, Japan) was conducted using a sample in an aluminium pan that was hermetically sealed. The samples were tested at a heating rate of 20°C/min in the 30°C–350°C range under a nitrogen atmosphere.


### 2.3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The morphologies of the obtained samples were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JSM6700, JEOL, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV with 500 × and 2000 × magnification, and the diameter and size distribution of the fibers were analyzed by using image visualization software (Image-Pro Plus).


### 2.3.5. GES Membrane Thickness and Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of the samples were analyzed using a universal testing machine (STA-1150, A&D Company, Ltd, Japan) equipped with a 50-N load cell and elongated at a constant speed of 10 mm/min under ambient conditions. The test samples were cut to 30 mm in length and 5 mm in width and were mounted in the tensile grips spaced 10 mm apart before analysis. The thicknesses of the samples were measured by a digital micrometer (IP65, Mitutoyo, Japan).


## 2.3.1. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR; 670-IR, VARIAN Inc., USA) was used for the identification of the functional groups in the samples. All FTIR spectra were scanned with a resolution of 0.5 cm−1 in the 4000–400 cm−1 range.


## 2.3.2. Thermogravimetric/Differential Thermal Analysis (TG/DTA)

Thermogravimetric/differential thermal analysis was performed by a TG/DTA analyzer (EXSTAR TG/DTA6200, SII, Japan) in order to measure the thermal properties of the samples. All samples were vacuum dried at room temperature for one day before analysis. The samples were tested at a heating rate of 20°C/min in the 30°C–500°C range under a nitrogen atmosphere.


## 2.3.3. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC; EXSTAR DSC6220, SII, Japan) was conducted using a sample in an aluminium pan that was hermetically sealed. The samples were tested at a heating rate of 20°C/min in the 30°C–350°C range under a nitrogen atmosphere.


## 2.3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The morphologies of the obtained samples were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JSM6700, JEOL, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV with 500 × and 2000 × magnification, and the diameter and size distribution of the fibers were analyzed by using image visualization software (Image-Pro Plus).


## 2.3.5. GES Membrane Thickness and Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of the samples were analyzed using a universal testing machine (STA-1150, A&D Company, Ltd, Japan) equipped with a 50-N load cell and elongated at a constant speed of 10 mm/min under ambient conditions. The test samples were cut to 30 mm in length and 5 mm in width and were mounted in the tensile grips spaced 10 mm apart before analysis. The thicknesses of the samples were measured by a digital micrometer (IP65, Mitutoyo, Japan).


## 2.4. Fabrication of EDLC Test Cells

Composite carbon electrodes were prepared by mixing activated carbon (YP-50F), acetylene black (HS-100) as a conductive additive, 1.2 wt% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (WS-C) as a dispersant, and 48 wt% styrene-butadiene rubber (TRD2001) as a binder in DI water at a ratio of 90 : 5:3 : 2 (w/w). The slurry was then cast onto an etched aluminium-foil current collector and dried; the obtained composite electrode sheet was cut into 12 mm diameter disks. Two carbon electrodes were immersed in EMImBF4 for 10 min in a glove box under reduced pressure while the gel electrolyte was soaked in EMImBF4 under a 0.3 Pa vacuum at room temperature for 48 h. The test cells were then assembled with the prepared carbon electrodes and gel electrolytes in a coin cell (CR2023, stainless type, Hohsen Corporation, Japan). In addition, test cells were assembled with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and a cellulose separator (TF4035, Nippon Kodoshi Corporation, Japan) for comparison. The whole assembly procedure was performed in an argon-filled glove box.


## 2.5. Measurement of Electrochemical Properties

The electrochemical properties of EDLC test cells were measured in terms of the charge-discharge characteristics, discharge capacitance, and AC impedance of each test cell. The performance was measured using a battery charge/discharge apparatus (HJ1001 SM8, Hokuto Denko Corporation, Japan). The charge-discharge tests were carried out in the voltage range from 0 to 2.5 V at various densities. The discharge rate was estimated at various discharge current densities between 2.5 and 100 mA/cm2 when a constant current was charged up to 2.5 V. The discharge capacitance of a single electrode in the EDLC symmetrical cells was determined using equation (1) [21–25]:(1)C=I×tV/2×W,where C is the discharge capacitance (F/g), I is the discharge current (A), t is the discharge time (s), V is the operating voltage (V), and W is the total mass of activated carbon in a single electrode (g).AC impedance measurements were performed using a potentiogalvanostat (SI 1287 type, Solartron Analytical, UK) and a frequency-response analyzer (SI 1260 type, Solartron Analytical, UK) with an AC amplitude of 10 mVp-0 in the frequency range of 500 kHz–10 mHz. All electrochemical measurements were performed at 25°C.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization

#### 3.1.1. FTIR

The FTIR spectra of gelatin powder and GES fibers fabricated at spinning times of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 min (labeled as GES-5, GES-10, GES-15, GES-20, and GES-25, respectively) are shown in Figure1(a). All samples showed similar absorption peaks. The characteristic peaks were interpreted as follows: the peak around 3300 cm−1 is due to the stretching vibration of N–H (amide A) and hydrogen bonding. The peak at 1650 cm−1 corresponds to the stretching vibration of C=O (amide I). The peak at 1540 cm−1 is induced by the bending and stretching vibration of N–H (amide II), and the peak at 1240 cm−1 is attributed to the bending of N–H. These absorption peaks are characteristic of gelatin [39, 55]; therefore, the presence of these peaks proves that the electrospinning process did not alter the functional groups of the gelatin.Figure 1
FTIR spectra of (a) gelatin powder and GES products and (b) GES-25, GES-25/EMImBF4, and EMImBF4.
(a)
(b)In addition, the GES-25 sample after immersion in EMImBF4 before the EDLC fabrication process (GES-25/EMImBF4) was measured by FTIR spectra for comparison with GES-25 and EMImBF4. The results are shown in Figure 1(b). The adsorption peak for GES-25/EMImBF4 is similar to that of GES-25 except for the new characteristic peaks of EMImBF4, which were observed as follows: the peaks at 3140 and 2980 cm−1 are due to the aliphatic asymmetric and symmetric C–H stretching vibrations (imidazolium ring). The peak at 1570 cm−1 is attributed to the C=C stretching vibration (imidazolium ring). The peak at 1169 cm−1 is induced by the C–N stretching vibration (imidazolium ring), and the peaks at 1049 and 525 cm−1 correspond to the asymmetric vibration of B–F [56–59]. The results confirm that EMImBF4 was introduced into the GES nanofibers.


#### 3.1.2. TG/DTG

TG and DTG thermograms of gelatin powder, GES products, GES-25/EMImBF4, and EMImBF4 are shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b), respectively. The gelatin powder and all GES products including the GES-25/EMImBF4 sample demonstrated weight loss due to the evaporation of the moisture on the surface in the temperature range of 40°C–130°C. The moisture content of the GES products was higher than that of the gelatin powder because of the comparatively high surface area of the GES fibers. The gelatin powder and all GES products showed only one thermal degradation step at which the onset of weight loss occurred around 200°C and the maximum weight loss occurred at approximately 330°C due to protein degradation [60, 61]. In contrast, the GES-25/EMImBF4 sample showed two distinctive thermal degradation stages. The first stage was observed at a temperature similar to that of gelatin powder and all GES products due to the degradation of the protein. The second stage was observed at 423°C due to the decomposition of EMImBF4 [62]; this can be seen also in the TG and DTG results for pure EMImBF4. These results demonstrate a high thermal stability and imply that GES fibers may potentially be used as gel electrolytes in EDLCs under high-temperature operations.Figure 2
(a) TGA and (b) DTG thermograms of gelatin powder, GES products, GES-25/EMImBF4, and EMImBF4.
(a)
(b)


#### 3.1.3. DSC

DSC determination grants information about the possible interactions between components in the target matrix, thereby providing knowledge about the applicability and stability of the biopolymer [63]. The DSC curves of gelatin powder, GES-25, and GES-25/EMImBF4 are shown in Figures 3(a)–3(c), respectively. The DSC curves represent an endothermic peak related to the glass transition temperature (Tg), the melting temperature (Tm), and the degradation temperature (Tdegradation) of the samples. The Tg of gelatin powder and GES-25 were found to be 72.9°C, while the Tg of GES-25/EMImBF4 was found to be 82.5°C. It is therefore possible that this observation is due to EMImBF4 incorporated into the GES fiber. The Tm and Tdegradation of gelatin powder, GES-25, and GES-25/EMImBF4 were found to be approximately 110°C and 277°C, respectively. The values of Tg/Tm and Tdegradation are in agreement with the values reported in the literature [51, 64]. Hence, the GES nanofibers could withstand the high temperatures; this result was consistent with the results of TG/DTG.Figure 3
DSC curves of (a) gelatin powder, (b) GES-25, and (c) GES-25/EMImBF4.


#### 3.1.4. SEM

SEM images of the GES products, as well as the fiber-diameter distribution measured from the SEM images, are shown in Figure4. The SEM images revealed a clearly nanofibrous structure with an average fiber diameter in the 306.2–428.4 nm range. The spinning time was not affected by the average diameter size of the fiber. The average diameter size of GES-5, GES-10, GES-15, GES-20, and GES-25 was 350.2, 332.1, 306.1, 320.1, and 428.4 nm, respectively.Figure 4
SEM images with 500 × and 2000 × magnification and the measured fiber-diameter distribution of (a) GES-5, (b) GES-10, (c) GES-15, (d) GES-20, and (e) GES-25.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)


#### 3.1.5. GES Membrane Thickness and Mechanical Properties

The thickness, tensile strength, and % elongation at break of the GES products are shown in Table1. The thicknesses of the membranes were greater with higher spinning times. This result is consistent with the tensile strength results: the tensile strength was greater in membranes fabricated with higher spinning times. On the contrary, the elongation at break of the GES products showed no tendency to increase or decrease with the spinning time, exhibiting an average of 13% elongation at break. This may have been due to the fibrous structure of the samples. Based on these results, the GES-25 sample showed the highest tensile strength with a thickness that was suitable for its use as a gel electrolyte in EDLCs. Thus, GES-25 was chosen for the following electrochemical tests.Table 1
Thickness and mechanical properties of GES products.
Sample
Thickness (μm)
Tensile strength (cN)
Elongation at break (%)
GES-5
25.5 ± 3.8
29.6 ± 11.6
11.6 ± 3.0
GES-10
34.8 ± 5.6
50.2 ± 22.5
11.3 ± 4.5
GES-15
46.1 ± 6.2
78.2 ± 35.0
14.5 ± 4.2
GES-20
72.4 ± 9.3
90.4 ± 24.5
13.3 ± 4.1
GES-25
76.4 ± 8.8
147.3 ± 33.7
15.8 ± 3.0


#### 3.1.6. Effect of EMImBF4 on GES

GES-25 after immersion in EMImBF4 before the EDLC fabrication process (GES-25/EMImBF4; wet stage) was compared with GES-25 (dry stage) to evaluate its mechanical properties. The results are shown in Table 2. The tensile strength of GES-25/EMImBF4 was decreased, while the elongation at break was obviously enhanced compared to GES-25. It is well known that gelatin nanofibrous membrane tends to be rubber-like in the wet stage and rigid-brittle in the dry stage [65]. This was mainly attributed to the presence of the EMImBF4 solution dispersed in the pores of nanofibrous membrane, thus weakening the interaction among neighboring fibers [66, 67].Table 2
Comparison of the mechanical properties of GES-25/EMImBF4 and GES-25.
Sample
Tensile strength (cN)
Elongation at break (%)
GES-25 (dry stage)
147.3 ± 33.7
15.8 ± 3.0
GES-25/EMImBF4 (wet stage)
30.8 ± 6.1
47.3 ± 5.5Furthermore, the GES-25/EMImBF4 sample was continually immersed in EMImBF4 at room temperature, incubated in a desiccator for 10 days, and washed with ethanol. Then, the structural morphology of this sample was observed using SEM as shown in Figure 5. The results indicated that the nanofibers of GES-25/EMImBF4 were stable and were not deformed from a fibrous structure after continuous immersion in EMImBF4 at room temperature for 10 days. It was reasonably explained that the GES nanofibers may potentially serve as a host to EMImBF4.Figure 5
SEM images of (a) GES-25 and (b) GES-25/EMImBF4 after continuous immersion in EMImBF4 for 10 days.
(a)
(b)


#### 3.1.7. Electrochemical Results

The electrochemical properties of the EDLC test cell with the GES-25/EMImBF4 gel electrolyte were measured and compared with the liquid phase of EMImBF4 as the electrolyte.The charge-discharge curves of EDLC test cells assembled with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and GES-25/EMImBF4 were measured at high current densities of 50 and 100 mA/cm2 and are shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b), respectively. Under these high current densities, the test cell with the GES-25/EMImBF4 gel electrolyte showed an IR drop at the switching point from charge to discharge, which was slightly larger than the IR drop of the test cell with liquid-phase EMImBF4 due to the ionic conductivity of the test cell with GES-25/EMImBF4 being lower than that of the liquid-phase EMImBF4 system [36, 68]. However, the ionic conductivity of the test cell with GES-25/EMImBF4 was shown to be significantly higher than that of the conventional gel-electrolytes composed of synthesized polymer matrix from previous reports [69].Figure 6
Charge-discharge curves of the EDLC test cells with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and with GES-25/EMImBF4 as the electrolytes at current densities of (a) 50 and (b) 100 mA/cm2.
(a)
(b)In addition, the discharge capacitance of the same EDLC test cells as a function of the applied current density in the range of 2.5–100 mA/cm2 is shown in Figure 7. The results demonstrate that the discharge capacitance retention of the test cell with the GES-25/EMImBF4 gel electrolyte differed only slightly from that of the test cell with the liquid-phase EMImBF4 electrolyte, within the entire current-density range. The calculated capacitance retention from the initial current density of 2.5 to 100 mA/cm2 of the test cells with GES-25/EMImBF4 was 56.6% which is comparable with the test cell using natural polymer gel electrolytes from chitosan, alginate, or bacterial cellulose including EMImBF4 from previous reports [25, 36, 68]. As a result, it should be noted that GES-25/EMImBF4 has the potential to exhibit an excellent electrochemical performance in the EDLC cell.Figure 7
Discharge capacitance of the EDLC test cells with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and with GES-25/EMImBF4 as the electrolytes.Overall, the charge-discharge measurements indicate that GES-25/EMImBF4 may be more effective as an electrolyte than liquid-phase EMImBF4 in nonaqueous EDLCs for improving the safety of the devices without reducing the performance.AC impedance measurements were carried out on the EDLC test cells assembled with either liquid-phase EMImBF4 or the GES-25/EMImBF4 electrolytes for the investigation of the electrochemical behavior at the electrode/electrolytes interface in detail [36, 68]. The Nyquist plots obtained by AC impedance measurements on the test cells having liquid-phase EMImBF4 or GES-25/EMImBF4 as electrolytes are shown in Figure 8. Both test cells showed a small semicircle at high frequencies followed by a transition to linearity at low frequencies, corresponding to capacitive behavior [69, 70]. Focusing on the semicircles, which represent the contact resistance between an electrode and electrolytes of the test cell [25, 36, 69, 71]; the observed semicircle of the test cell with GES-25/EMImBF4 was slightly larger than test cells with liquid-phase EMImBF4. This result indicates that the obtained GES electrolyte was in poor contact with the activated carbon electrode [36, 68]. Thus, to improve the contact surface between the GES gel electrolyte and the electrode of activated carbon is an interesting topic for future research. However, the knowledge gained from this experiment has the potential to guide future approaches to develop gel electrolytes from gelatin for use in EDLCs.Figure 8
Nyquist plots obtained by AC impedance measurements of EDLC test cells with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and with GES-25/EMImBF4 as electrolytes.


## 3.1. Characterization

### 3.1.1. FTIR

The FTIR spectra of gelatin powder and GES fibers fabricated at spinning times of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 min (labeled as GES-5, GES-10, GES-15, GES-20, and GES-25, respectively) are shown in Figure1(a). All samples showed similar absorption peaks. The characteristic peaks were interpreted as follows: the peak around 3300 cm−1 is due to the stretching vibration of N–H (amide A) and hydrogen bonding. The peak at 1650 cm−1 corresponds to the stretching vibration of C=O (amide I). The peak at 1540 cm−1 is induced by the bending and stretching vibration of N–H (amide II), and the peak at 1240 cm−1 is attributed to the bending of N–H. These absorption peaks are characteristic of gelatin [39, 55]; therefore, the presence of these peaks proves that the electrospinning process did not alter the functional groups of the gelatin.Figure 1
FTIR spectra of (a) gelatin powder and GES products and (b) GES-25, GES-25/EMImBF4, and EMImBF4.
(a)
(b)In addition, the GES-25 sample after immersion in EMImBF4 before the EDLC fabrication process (GES-25/EMImBF4) was measured by FTIR spectra for comparison with GES-25 and EMImBF4. The results are shown in Figure 1(b). The adsorption peak for GES-25/EMImBF4 is similar to that of GES-25 except for the new characteristic peaks of EMImBF4, which were observed as follows: the peaks at 3140 and 2980 cm−1 are due to the aliphatic asymmetric and symmetric C–H stretching vibrations (imidazolium ring). The peak at 1570 cm−1 is attributed to the C=C stretching vibration (imidazolium ring). The peak at 1169 cm−1 is induced by the C–N stretching vibration (imidazolium ring), and the peaks at 1049 and 525 cm−1 correspond to the asymmetric vibration of B–F [56–59]. The results confirm that EMImBF4 was introduced into the GES nanofibers.


### 3.1.2. TG/DTG

TG and DTG thermograms of gelatin powder, GES products, GES-25/EMImBF4, and EMImBF4 are shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b), respectively. The gelatin powder and all GES products including the GES-25/EMImBF4 sample demonstrated weight loss due to the evaporation of the moisture on the surface in the temperature range of 40°C–130°C. The moisture content of the GES products was higher than that of the gelatin powder because of the comparatively high surface area of the GES fibers. The gelatin powder and all GES products showed only one thermal degradation step at which the onset of weight loss occurred around 200°C and the maximum weight loss occurred at approximately 330°C due to protein degradation [60, 61]. In contrast, the GES-25/EMImBF4 sample showed two distinctive thermal degradation stages. The first stage was observed at a temperature similar to that of gelatin powder and all GES products due to the degradation of the protein. The second stage was observed at 423°C due to the decomposition of EMImBF4 [62]; this can be seen also in the TG and DTG results for pure EMImBF4. These results demonstrate a high thermal stability and imply that GES fibers may potentially be used as gel electrolytes in EDLCs under high-temperature operations.Figure 2
(a) TGA and (b) DTG thermograms of gelatin powder, GES products, GES-25/EMImBF4, and EMImBF4.
(a)
(b)


### 3.1.3. DSC

DSC determination grants information about the possible interactions between components in the target matrix, thereby providing knowledge about the applicability and stability of the biopolymer [63]. The DSC curves of gelatin powder, GES-25, and GES-25/EMImBF4 are shown in Figures 3(a)–3(c), respectively. The DSC curves represent an endothermic peak related to the glass transition temperature (Tg), the melting temperature (Tm), and the degradation temperature (Tdegradation) of the samples. The Tg of gelatin powder and GES-25 were found to be 72.9°C, while the Tg of GES-25/EMImBF4 was found to be 82.5°C. It is therefore possible that this observation is due to EMImBF4 incorporated into the GES fiber. The Tm and Tdegradation of gelatin powder, GES-25, and GES-25/EMImBF4 were found to be approximately 110°C and 277°C, respectively. The values of Tg/Tm and Tdegradation are in agreement with the values reported in the literature [51, 64]. Hence, the GES nanofibers could withstand the high temperatures; this result was consistent with the results of TG/DTG.Figure 3
DSC curves of (a) gelatin powder, (b) GES-25, and (c) GES-25/EMImBF4.


### 3.1.4. SEM

SEM images of the GES products, as well as the fiber-diameter distribution measured from the SEM images, are shown in Figure4. The SEM images revealed a clearly nanofibrous structure with an average fiber diameter in the 306.2–428.4 nm range. The spinning time was not affected by the average diameter size of the fiber. The average diameter size of GES-5, GES-10, GES-15, GES-20, and GES-25 was 350.2, 332.1, 306.1, 320.1, and 428.4 nm, respectively.Figure 4
SEM images with 500 × and 2000 × magnification and the measured fiber-diameter distribution of (a) GES-5, (b) GES-10, (c) GES-15, (d) GES-20, and (e) GES-25.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)


### 3.1.5. GES Membrane Thickness and Mechanical Properties

The thickness, tensile strength, and % elongation at break of the GES products are shown in Table1. The thicknesses of the membranes were greater with higher spinning times. This result is consistent with the tensile strength results: the tensile strength was greater in membranes fabricated with higher spinning times. On the contrary, the elongation at break of the GES products showed no tendency to increase or decrease with the spinning time, exhibiting an average of 13% elongation at break. This may have been due to the fibrous structure of the samples. Based on these results, the GES-25 sample showed the highest tensile strength with a thickness that was suitable for its use as a gel electrolyte in EDLCs. Thus, GES-25 was chosen for the following electrochemical tests.Table 1
Thickness and mechanical properties of GES products.
Sample
Thickness (μm)
Tensile strength (cN)
Elongation at break (%)
GES-5
25.5 ± 3.8
29.6 ± 11.6
11.6 ± 3.0
GES-10
34.8 ± 5.6
50.2 ± 22.5
11.3 ± 4.5
GES-15
46.1 ± 6.2
78.2 ± 35.0
14.5 ± 4.2
GES-20
72.4 ± 9.3
90.4 ± 24.5
13.3 ± 4.1
GES-25
76.4 ± 8.8
147.3 ± 33.7
15.8 ± 3.0


### 3.1.6. Effect of EMImBF4 on GES

GES-25 after immersion in EMImBF4 before the EDLC fabrication process (GES-25/EMImBF4; wet stage) was compared with GES-25 (dry stage) to evaluate its mechanical properties. The results are shown in Table 2. The tensile strength of GES-25/EMImBF4 was decreased, while the elongation at break was obviously enhanced compared to GES-25. It is well known that gelatin nanofibrous membrane tends to be rubber-like in the wet stage and rigid-brittle in the dry stage [65]. This was mainly attributed to the presence of the EMImBF4 solution dispersed in the pores of nanofibrous membrane, thus weakening the interaction among neighboring fibers [66, 67].Table 2
Comparison of the mechanical properties of GES-25/EMImBF4 and GES-25.
Sample
Tensile strength (cN)
Elongation at break (%)
GES-25 (dry stage)
147.3 ± 33.7
15.8 ± 3.0
GES-25/EMImBF4 (wet stage)
30.8 ± 6.1
47.3 ± 5.5Furthermore, the GES-25/EMImBF4 sample was continually immersed in EMImBF4 at room temperature, incubated in a desiccator for 10 days, and washed with ethanol. Then, the structural morphology of this sample was observed using SEM as shown in Figure 5. The results indicated that the nanofibers of GES-25/EMImBF4 were stable and were not deformed from a fibrous structure after continuous immersion in EMImBF4 at room temperature for 10 days. It was reasonably explained that the GES nanofibers may potentially serve as a host to EMImBF4.Figure 5
SEM images of (a) GES-25 and (b) GES-25/EMImBF4 after continuous immersion in EMImBF4 for 10 days.
(a)
(b)


### 3.1.7. Electrochemical Results

The electrochemical properties of the EDLC test cell with the GES-25/EMImBF4 gel electrolyte were measured and compared with the liquid phase of EMImBF4 as the electrolyte.The charge-discharge curves of EDLC test cells assembled with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and GES-25/EMImBF4 were measured at high current densities of 50 and 100 mA/cm2 and are shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b), respectively. Under these high current densities, the test cell with the GES-25/EMImBF4 gel electrolyte showed an IR drop at the switching point from charge to discharge, which was slightly larger than the IR drop of the test cell with liquid-phase EMImBF4 due to the ionic conductivity of the test cell with GES-25/EMImBF4 being lower than that of the liquid-phase EMImBF4 system [36, 68]. However, the ionic conductivity of the test cell with GES-25/EMImBF4 was shown to be significantly higher than that of the conventional gel-electrolytes composed of synthesized polymer matrix from previous reports [69].Figure 6
Charge-discharge curves of the EDLC test cells with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and with GES-25/EMImBF4 as the electrolytes at current densities of (a) 50 and (b) 100 mA/cm2.
(a)
(b)In addition, the discharge capacitance of the same EDLC test cells as a function of the applied current density in the range of 2.5–100 mA/cm2 is shown in Figure 7. The results demonstrate that the discharge capacitance retention of the test cell with the GES-25/EMImBF4 gel electrolyte differed only slightly from that of the test cell with the liquid-phase EMImBF4 electrolyte, within the entire current-density range. The calculated capacitance retention from the initial current density of 2.5 to 100 mA/cm2 of the test cells with GES-25/EMImBF4 was 56.6% which is comparable with the test cell using natural polymer gel electrolytes from chitosan, alginate, or bacterial cellulose including EMImBF4 from previous reports [25, 36, 68]. As a result, it should be noted that GES-25/EMImBF4 has the potential to exhibit an excellent electrochemical performance in the EDLC cell.Figure 7
Discharge capacitance of the EDLC test cells with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and with GES-25/EMImBF4 as the electrolytes.Overall, the charge-discharge measurements indicate that GES-25/EMImBF4 may be more effective as an electrolyte than liquid-phase EMImBF4 in nonaqueous EDLCs for improving the safety of the devices without reducing the performance.AC impedance measurements were carried out on the EDLC test cells assembled with either liquid-phase EMImBF4 or the GES-25/EMImBF4 electrolytes for the investigation of the electrochemical behavior at the electrode/electrolytes interface in detail [36, 68]. The Nyquist plots obtained by AC impedance measurements on the test cells having liquid-phase EMImBF4 or GES-25/EMImBF4 as electrolytes are shown in Figure 8. Both test cells showed a small semicircle at high frequencies followed by a transition to linearity at low frequencies, corresponding to capacitive behavior [69, 70]. Focusing on the semicircles, which represent the contact resistance between an electrode and electrolytes of the test cell [25, 36, 69, 71]; the observed semicircle of the test cell with GES-25/EMImBF4 was slightly larger than test cells with liquid-phase EMImBF4. This result indicates that the obtained GES electrolyte was in poor contact with the activated carbon electrode [36, 68]. Thus, to improve the contact surface between the GES gel electrolyte and the electrode of activated carbon is an interesting topic for future research. However, the knowledge gained from this experiment has the potential to guide future approaches to develop gel electrolytes from gelatin for use in EDLCs.Figure 8
Nyquist plots obtained by AC impedance measurements of EDLC test cells with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and with GES-25/EMImBF4 as electrolytes.


## 3.1.1. FTIR

The FTIR spectra of gelatin powder and GES fibers fabricated at spinning times of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 min (labeled as GES-5, GES-10, GES-15, GES-20, and GES-25, respectively) are shown in Figure1(a). All samples showed similar absorption peaks. The characteristic peaks were interpreted as follows: the peak around 3300 cm−1 is due to the stretching vibration of N–H (amide A) and hydrogen bonding. The peak at 1650 cm−1 corresponds to the stretching vibration of C=O (amide I). The peak at 1540 cm−1 is induced by the bending and stretching vibration of N–H (amide II), and the peak at 1240 cm−1 is attributed to the bending of N–H. These absorption peaks are characteristic of gelatin [39, 55]; therefore, the presence of these peaks proves that the electrospinning process did not alter the functional groups of the gelatin.Figure 1
FTIR spectra of (a) gelatin powder and GES products and (b) GES-25, GES-25/EMImBF4, and EMImBF4.
(a)
(b)In addition, the GES-25 sample after immersion in EMImBF4 before the EDLC fabrication process (GES-25/EMImBF4) was measured by FTIR spectra for comparison with GES-25 and EMImBF4. The results are shown in Figure 1(b). The adsorption peak for GES-25/EMImBF4 is similar to that of GES-25 except for the new characteristic peaks of EMImBF4, which were observed as follows: the peaks at 3140 and 2980 cm−1 are due to the aliphatic asymmetric and symmetric C–H stretching vibrations (imidazolium ring). The peak at 1570 cm−1 is attributed to the C=C stretching vibration (imidazolium ring). The peak at 1169 cm−1 is induced by the C–N stretching vibration (imidazolium ring), and the peaks at 1049 and 525 cm−1 correspond to the asymmetric vibration of B–F [56–59]. The results confirm that EMImBF4 was introduced into the GES nanofibers.


## 3.1.2. TG/DTG

TG and DTG thermograms of gelatin powder, GES products, GES-25/EMImBF4, and EMImBF4 are shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b), respectively. The gelatin powder and all GES products including the GES-25/EMImBF4 sample demonstrated weight loss due to the evaporation of the moisture on the surface in the temperature range of 40°C–130°C. The moisture content of the GES products was higher than that of the gelatin powder because of the comparatively high surface area of the GES fibers. The gelatin powder and all GES products showed only one thermal degradation step at which the onset of weight loss occurred around 200°C and the maximum weight loss occurred at approximately 330°C due to protein degradation [60, 61]. In contrast, the GES-25/EMImBF4 sample showed two distinctive thermal degradation stages. The first stage was observed at a temperature similar to that of gelatin powder and all GES products due to the degradation of the protein. The second stage was observed at 423°C due to the decomposition of EMImBF4 [62]; this can be seen also in the TG and DTG results for pure EMImBF4. These results demonstrate a high thermal stability and imply that GES fibers may potentially be used as gel electrolytes in EDLCs under high-temperature operations.Figure 2
(a) TGA and (b) DTG thermograms of gelatin powder, GES products, GES-25/EMImBF4, and EMImBF4.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1.3. DSC

DSC determination grants information about the possible interactions between components in the target matrix, thereby providing knowledge about the applicability and stability of the biopolymer [63]. The DSC curves of gelatin powder, GES-25, and GES-25/EMImBF4 are shown in Figures 3(a)–3(c), respectively. The DSC curves represent an endothermic peak related to the glass transition temperature (Tg), the melting temperature (Tm), and the degradation temperature (Tdegradation) of the samples. The Tg of gelatin powder and GES-25 were found to be 72.9°C, while the Tg of GES-25/EMImBF4 was found to be 82.5°C. It is therefore possible that this observation is due to EMImBF4 incorporated into the GES fiber. The Tm and Tdegradation of gelatin powder, GES-25, and GES-25/EMImBF4 were found to be approximately 110°C and 277°C, respectively. The values of Tg/Tm and Tdegradation are in agreement with the values reported in the literature [51, 64]. Hence, the GES nanofibers could withstand the high temperatures; this result was consistent with the results of TG/DTG.Figure 3
DSC curves of (a) gelatin powder, (b) GES-25, and (c) GES-25/EMImBF4.


## 3.1.4. SEM

SEM images of the GES products, as well as the fiber-diameter distribution measured from the SEM images, are shown in Figure4. The SEM images revealed a clearly nanofibrous structure with an average fiber diameter in the 306.2–428.4 nm range. The spinning time was not affected by the average diameter size of the fiber. The average diameter size of GES-5, GES-10, GES-15, GES-20, and GES-25 was 350.2, 332.1, 306.1, 320.1, and 428.4 nm, respectively.Figure 4
SEM images with 500 × and 2000 × magnification and the measured fiber-diameter distribution of (a) GES-5, (b) GES-10, (c) GES-15, (d) GES-20, and (e) GES-25.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)


## 3.1.5. GES Membrane Thickness and Mechanical Properties

The thickness, tensile strength, and % elongation at break of the GES products are shown in Table1. The thicknesses of the membranes were greater with higher spinning times. This result is consistent with the tensile strength results: the tensile strength was greater in membranes fabricated with higher spinning times. On the contrary, the elongation at break of the GES products showed no tendency to increase or decrease with the spinning time, exhibiting an average of 13% elongation at break. This may have been due to the fibrous structure of the samples. Based on these results, the GES-25 sample showed the highest tensile strength with a thickness that was suitable for its use as a gel electrolyte in EDLCs. Thus, GES-25 was chosen for the following electrochemical tests.Table 1
Thickness and mechanical properties of GES products.
Sample
Thickness (μm)
Tensile strength (cN)
Elongation at break (%)
GES-5
25.5 ± 3.8
29.6 ± 11.6
11.6 ± 3.0
GES-10
34.8 ± 5.6
50.2 ± 22.5
11.3 ± 4.5
GES-15
46.1 ± 6.2
78.2 ± 35.0
14.5 ± 4.2
GES-20
72.4 ± 9.3
90.4 ± 24.5
13.3 ± 4.1
GES-25
76.4 ± 8.8
147.3 ± 33.7
15.8 ± 3.0


## 3.1.6. Effect of EMImBF4 on GES

GES-25 after immersion in EMImBF4 before the EDLC fabrication process (GES-25/EMImBF4; wet stage) was compared with GES-25 (dry stage) to evaluate its mechanical properties. The results are shown in Table 2. The tensile strength of GES-25/EMImBF4 was decreased, while the elongation at break was obviously enhanced compared to GES-25. It is well known that gelatin nanofibrous membrane tends to be rubber-like in the wet stage and rigid-brittle in the dry stage [65]. This was mainly attributed to the presence of the EMImBF4 solution dispersed in the pores of nanofibrous membrane, thus weakening the interaction among neighboring fibers [66, 67].Table 2
Comparison of the mechanical properties of GES-25/EMImBF4 and GES-25.
Sample
Tensile strength (cN)
Elongation at break (%)
GES-25 (dry stage)
147.3 ± 33.7
15.8 ± 3.0
GES-25/EMImBF4 (wet stage)
30.8 ± 6.1
47.3 ± 5.5Furthermore, the GES-25/EMImBF4 sample was continually immersed in EMImBF4 at room temperature, incubated in a desiccator for 10 days, and washed with ethanol. Then, the structural morphology of this sample was observed using SEM as shown in Figure 5. The results indicated that the nanofibers of GES-25/EMImBF4 were stable and were not deformed from a fibrous structure after continuous immersion in EMImBF4 at room temperature for 10 days. It was reasonably explained that the GES nanofibers may potentially serve as a host to EMImBF4.Figure 5
SEM images of (a) GES-25 and (b) GES-25/EMImBF4 after continuous immersion in EMImBF4 for 10 days.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1.7. Electrochemical Results

The electrochemical properties of the EDLC test cell with the GES-25/EMImBF4 gel electrolyte were measured and compared with the liquid phase of EMImBF4 as the electrolyte.The charge-discharge curves of EDLC test cells assembled with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and GES-25/EMImBF4 were measured at high current densities of 50 and 100 mA/cm2 and are shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b), respectively. Under these high current densities, the test cell with the GES-25/EMImBF4 gel electrolyte showed an IR drop at the switching point from charge to discharge, which was slightly larger than the IR drop of the test cell with liquid-phase EMImBF4 due to the ionic conductivity of the test cell with GES-25/EMImBF4 being lower than that of the liquid-phase EMImBF4 system [36, 68]. However, the ionic conductivity of the test cell with GES-25/EMImBF4 was shown to be significantly higher than that of the conventional gel-electrolytes composed of synthesized polymer matrix from previous reports [69].Figure 6
Charge-discharge curves of the EDLC test cells with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and with GES-25/EMImBF4 as the electrolytes at current densities of (a) 50 and (b) 100 mA/cm2.
(a)
(b)In addition, the discharge capacitance of the same EDLC test cells as a function of the applied current density in the range of 2.5–100 mA/cm2 is shown in Figure 7. The results demonstrate that the discharge capacitance retention of the test cell with the GES-25/EMImBF4 gel electrolyte differed only slightly from that of the test cell with the liquid-phase EMImBF4 electrolyte, within the entire current-density range. The calculated capacitance retention from the initial current density of 2.5 to 100 mA/cm2 of the test cells with GES-25/EMImBF4 was 56.6% which is comparable with the test cell using natural polymer gel electrolytes from chitosan, alginate, or bacterial cellulose including EMImBF4 from previous reports [25, 36, 68]. As a result, it should be noted that GES-25/EMImBF4 has the potential to exhibit an excellent electrochemical performance in the EDLC cell.Figure 7
Discharge capacitance of the EDLC test cells with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and with GES-25/EMImBF4 as the electrolytes.Overall, the charge-discharge measurements indicate that GES-25/EMImBF4 may be more effective as an electrolyte than liquid-phase EMImBF4 in nonaqueous EDLCs for improving the safety of the devices without reducing the performance.AC impedance measurements were carried out on the EDLC test cells assembled with either liquid-phase EMImBF4 or the GES-25/EMImBF4 electrolytes for the investigation of the electrochemical behavior at the electrode/electrolytes interface in detail [36, 68]. The Nyquist plots obtained by AC impedance measurements on the test cells having liquid-phase EMImBF4 or GES-25/EMImBF4 as electrolytes are shown in Figure 8. Both test cells showed a small semicircle at high frequencies followed by a transition to linearity at low frequencies, corresponding to capacitive behavior [69, 70]. Focusing on the semicircles, which represent the contact resistance between an electrode and electrolytes of the test cell [25, 36, 69, 71]; the observed semicircle of the test cell with GES-25/EMImBF4 was slightly larger than test cells with liquid-phase EMImBF4. This result indicates that the obtained GES electrolyte was in poor contact with the activated carbon electrode [36, 68]. Thus, to improve the contact surface between the GES gel electrolyte and the electrode of activated carbon is an interesting topic for future research. However, the knowledge gained from this experiment has the potential to guide future approaches to develop gel electrolytes from gelatin for use in EDLCs.Figure 8
Nyquist plots obtained by AC impedance measurements of EDLC test cells with liquid-phase EMImBF4 and with GES-25/EMImBF4 as electrolytes.


## 4. Conclusions

In this study, a novel nonaqueous gel electrolyte was successfully prepared by electrospinning of gelatin and characterized to evaluate its application as both the electrolyte and the separator for EDLCs. To fabricate the electrolytes, gelatin powder was dissolved in DI water at 25 wt%. This solution was then electrospun over a range of spinning times. Based on structural analysis, the fabricated GES electrolytes had a nanofibrous structure with fiber diameters in the 306.2–428.4 nm range. The FTIR spectra of the GES products revealed peaks that are characteristic of gelatin, indicating that the electrospinning process did not alter the functional groups of the gelatin. TG/DTG and DSC curves indicated that the GES products had high thermal stabilities, which is a favorable property for gel electrolytes used in EDLCs at high-temperature operation. The thickness of the GES membranes increased with an increase in spinning time. The tensile test results for the obtained samples showed that the nanofibrous structure was highly flexible and had a high tensile strength. Moreover, the GES-25/EMImBF4 sample before fabricating in the EDLC was characterized; FTIR, TG/DTG, and DSC results indicated that EMImBF4 was dispersed in the pores of the GES nanofibers. The mechanical properties showed a decrease in tensile strength and an increase in % elongation at break and showed a stable form of nanofibrous structure after immersion in EMImBF4.EDLC test cells were assembled with GES-25/EMImBF4 and with pure EMImBF4 as the electrolytes to evaluate their electrochemical properties. The test cell with the GES-25/EMImBF4 gel electrolyte exhibited a comparable IR drop and discharge capacitance as compared to that with liquid-EMImBF4. The GES-25/EMImBF4-assembled test cell also showed a poor electrode/gel electrolyte interface resistance at the electrode/electrolyte interface compared to those with pure EMImBF4 electrolytes. The electrochemical characteristics suggested that the proposed novel electrolyte of GES nanofibers can be employed as an effective nonaqueous gel electrolyte in EDLCs, thereby improving the safety of such devices.



---

*Source: 2501039-2019-02-24.xml*