# Corrosion Behavior of Welded Joint of Q690 with CMT Twin

Authors: Peng Liu; Shanguo Han; Yaoyong Yi; Cuixia Yan
Journal: International Journal of Corrosion
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Low alloy steel of Q690 was welded with the method of CMT Twin. The corrosion behavior of welded joint had been investigated using scanning vibrating electrode technique (SVET) in 3.5% NaCl solution. The research results showed that the appearance of the troostite increased the hardness of the heat affected zone. Furthermore, the corrosion products of different microstructure were identical, and the white products (Fe(OH)2) of welded joint turned into products of rufous (Fe(OH)3). The quantitative information provided by SVET was discussed, and the corrosion degree was measured by some parameters. In comparison with other areas, the corrosion rates of the overheated zone and the base metal were higher. Then, the corrosion resistance of the weld zone with CMT Twin was greatly improved, when compared with that of the base metal. Therefore, Ni has significant influence on corrosion resistance of weld zone. In summary, it can be discovered that the corrosion rates of various zones were related to the welding heat input.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Q690 steel is known as a typical low carbon bainite steel with excellent mechanical properties, and it is widely used in offshore engineering industry [1, 2]. However, the complex chloride environment tends to be invalidated ahead of lifetime in welded parts, so it is significant to study the corrosion behavior of welded parts [3, 4]. Furthermore, the chloride environment contains more inorganic salts (such as NaCl and MgCl2) [5], and Cl- is the most important corrosive ion. Subsequently, Cl- is able to destroy the protective effect of the corrosion scales, and it significantly increases the activity of the matrix. So Cl- can accelerate the corrosion rate, and eventually lifetime of the welded joint will be reduced. Owing to the difference of microstructure in the welded joint, the corrosion situation is different. Various traditional corrosion detection methods [6, 7] obtain the corrosion condition of the whole electrode only and cannot get the corrosion behavior of the microregions. On microstructure and grain size of the welded joint, the electrochemical method of microregion has peculiar advantages over the classical electrochemical method.Scanning vibrating electrode technique (SVET) [8, 9] is to study the corrosion resistance of samples by detecting the local corrosion potential (current) information of samples without touching the surface of the sample. However, welding defects can affect the electric potential of SVET, thus affecting test results [10, 11]. Therefore, SVET has been widely used in the research of various types of corrosion, such as pitting, intergranular corrosion, and stress corrosion [12, 13].In previous researches the corrosion behavior of welded joint was studied with SVET. Wang et al. studied the corrosion behavior of HAZ in acidic soil solution with SVET [14]. The results demonstrated that microstructure of granular bainite mixed with ferrite was with the highest charge transfer resistance and the most positive current density value. Acicular ferrite of base metal displayed the lowest charge transfer resistance and the most negative current density. Liu et al. studied the corrosion properties of welded joints with different heat input in high strength low alloy steel [15]. Fuertes et al. used SVET to investigate oxide dissolution and initiation and propagation of corrosion on the welded zone [16]. Luo et al. used SVET to study stress corrosion cracking in heat affected zone [17]. The formation and development of stress corrosion cracking were explained. Ma et al. used SVET to investigate the localized corrosion behaviors of the welded joint [18]. They discovered that there were the maximum microhardness and the densest microstructure in the welded zone compared with the other zones. And the welded zone presented the lowest current density due to the presence of iron oxides and the densest microstructure, thus showing the excellent corrosion resistance. Indeed, the SVET results reveal that the corrosion rates of welded specimens are associated with the welding heat input and corrosion products.The above studies indicate that the various microstructure of the welded joint is an important parameter of affecting corrosion resistance. Adopting local electrochemical measurement techniques for characterizing the localized corrosion of welded joint can better reveal the corrosion mechanism, and the corrosion behavior of welded joint with different microstructure is clearly evaluated. It is relatively rare to study the corrosion resistance of welded joints with SVET technology in chloride environment. Therefore, it is significant for the research of Q690 in 3.5% NaCl solution.In this work, a SVET method provided further valuable information on different microstructure of the welded joints and evaluated the corrosion resistance of the welded joint. Combined with the microstructure and hardness analysis, the corrosion behavior of Q690 with CMT Twin in 3.5% NaCl solution was carried out.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

The low alloy steel of Q690 was welded with CMT Twin, and the dimension of groove was shown in Figure1. In this work, the welding wire (type: OK AristoRod 69/ER110S-G, produced by ESAB company) of 1.2 mm in diameter was utilized as the filling material in welding groove. Moreover, a welding machine (type: TransPuls Synergic CMT 5000, produced by Fronius Company) was utilized, and a mixture of 82% Ar + 18% CO2 was selected. The chemical compositions of the base material Q690 and the wire were shown in Table 1.Table 1
The chemical compositions of the tested steel (Q690) and ER 110S-G (wt%).
materials C Si Mn P S V Ti Cr Ni Cu Q690 ≤0.18 ≤0.50 ≤1.70 ≤0.025 ≤0.02 ≤0.15 ≤0.2 ≤0.3 ≤0.50 ≤0.30 ER 110S-G ≤0.1 0.4-0.8 1.5-1.8 ≤0.02 ≤0.02 — — — 1.3-1.6 0.2-0.4Figure 1
Schematic illustration of welded groove.


### 2.2. The Test Method

#### 2.2.1. Hardness Analysis

Microhardness test was conducted through a nanoindentation measuring device (type: HVS 1000). The test force was 1 Kgf and the force duration was 10 s. The distance between each point was 0.5 mm. The connection between hardness value and microstructure is very close. The hardness is very important in mechanical properties of the materials.


#### 2.2.2. Microstructure Analysis

The micro-images of cross section were shown in Figure2, which exhibited that joint had good welding quality. Microstructure samples were machined with 10 mm×10 mm×5 mm, which ensured that the specimen contained base metal (BM), heat affected zone (HAZ), and weld zone (WZ). Prior to microstructure testing, the sample was polished sequentially with the number of 120, 240, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 emery papers and then polished to the mirror with 1.5 mm diamond paste. After drying, the specimen was etched by a mixture of 4% nitric acid and ethanol (weight fraction). The sample was dried with air compressor; microstructure of the sample was observed with metalloscope.Figure 2
Cross section macro-images of the weld joint.


#### 2.2.3. Corrosion Behavior Analysis

All sides of the specimen were embedded in an epoxy resin except the exposure surface, and the working area was 14 mm×14 mm. Polish the face of the specimen, clean the surface with anhydrous ethanol, and dry it with air compressor. Subsequently, the SVET measurements were conducted through a PAR370 Scanning Electrochemical Workstation. The SVET test was adopted by the Versa SCAN electrochemical scanning system, and the scanning microprobe was a Pt-Ir microelectrode with a diameter of 50 um. At the beginning of the test, the sample was placed in the electrolytic cell, and the surface of the sample remained horizontal.The scanning probe vibrated in the perpendicular direction at the surface of the sample, and the distance between the probe and sample surface was 100 um. The vibrating amplitude of the microelectrode was 30 um and the vibrating frequency was 50 Hz in the direction to the surface. The scanning area was 5 mm × 3 mm, and it scanned from weld zone to base metal.SVET measurements were carried out in electrochemical corrosion testing apparatus at room temperature in 3.5wt% NaCl solution [19–21]. And the probe was immersed into 3.5 wt% NaCl aqueous solution. The results of SVET were the ion potential difference of local oxidation-reduction reaction on the specimen surface, and the data were converted to local current density according to the specification of data processing in instrument.The SVET current density maps and the statistical analysis of the data were performed with Origin software. The current densities were displayed in three-dimensional (3D) maps, showing the spatial distribution of the current density as a function of the (x,y) position in the scan region. The current values in the SVET map are positive for anodic currents and negative for cathodic currents. The contour map of the current densities is at the bottom of the 3D maps.The integrated anodic current (IInt) was used to characterize the corrosion resistance of different microstructure. IInt was evaluated by integration of the overall anodic current (iA) on SVET current density map. The whole scan area was split into 21×21 small squares, and we calculated the scan area (S) and number (n) of measurement points in each microstructure. The scan area of WZ, overheated zone (OZ), normalized zone (NZ), incomplete normalized zone (INZ), and BM, respectively, was 4.9, 2.2, 2.5, 0.4, and 5.0 mm2, and n of WZ, OZ, NZ, INZ, and BM, respectively, was 142, 56, 74, 20, and 149. We calculated the anodic current on each microstructure, and calculation formula is shown by(1)Iint=S∑iAn (see [22]) where iA is the anodic current density (iA>0) measurement points in each microstructure.


## 2.1. Materials

The low alloy steel of Q690 was welded with CMT Twin, and the dimension of groove was shown in Figure1. In this work, the welding wire (type: OK AristoRod 69/ER110S-G, produced by ESAB company) of 1.2 mm in diameter was utilized as the filling material in welding groove. Moreover, a welding machine (type: TransPuls Synergic CMT 5000, produced by Fronius Company) was utilized, and a mixture of 82% Ar + 18% CO2 was selected. The chemical compositions of the base material Q690 and the wire were shown in Table 1.Table 1
The chemical compositions of the tested steel (Q690) and ER 110S-G (wt%).
materials C Si Mn P S V Ti Cr Ni Cu Q690 ≤0.18 ≤0.50 ≤1.70 ≤0.025 ≤0.02 ≤0.15 ≤0.2 ≤0.3 ≤0.50 ≤0.30 ER 110S-G ≤0.1 0.4-0.8 1.5-1.8 ≤0.02 ≤0.02 — — — 1.3-1.6 0.2-0.4Figure 1
Schematic illustration of welded groove.


## 2.2. The Test Method

### 2.2.1. Hardness Analysis

Microhardness test was conducted through a nanoindentation measuring device (type: HVS 1000). The test force was 1 Kgf and the force duration was 10 s. The distance between each point was 0.5 mm. The connection between hardness value and microstructure is very close. The hardness is very important in mechanical properties of the materials.


### 2.2.2. Microstructure Analysis

The micro-images of cross section were shown in Figure2, which exhibited that joint had good welding quality. Microstructure samples were machined with 10 mm×10 mm×5 mm, which ensured that the specimen contained base metal (BM), heat affected zone (HAZ), and weld zone (WZ). Prior to microstructure testing, the sample was polished sequentially with the number of 120, 240, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 emery papers and then polished to the mirror with 1.5 mm diamond paste. After drying, the specimen was etched by a mixture of 4% nitric acid and ethanol (weight fraction). The sample was dried with air compressor; microstructure of the sample was observed with metalloscope.Figure 2
Cross section macro-images of the weld joint.


### 2.2.3. Corrosion Behavior Analysis

All sides of the specimen were embedded in an epoxy resin except the exposure surface, and the working area was 14 mm×14 mm. Polish the face of the specimen, clean the surface with anhydrous ethanol, and dry it with air compressor. Subsequently, the SVET measurements were conducted through a PAR370 Scanning Electrochemical Workstation. The SVET test was adopted by the Versa SCAN electrochemical scanning system, and the scanning microprobe was a Pt-Ir microelectrode with a diameter of 50 um. At the beginning of the test, the sample was placed in the electrolytic cell, and the surface of the sample remained horizontal.The scanning probe vibrated in the perpendicular direction at the surface of the sample, and the distance between the probe and sample surface was 100 um. The vibrating amplitude of the microelectrode was 30 um and the vibrating frequency was 50 Hz in the direction to the surface. The scanning area was 5 mm × 3 mm, and it scanned from weld zone to base metal.SVET measurements were carried out in electrochemical corrosion testing apparatus at room temperature in 3.5wt% NaCl solution [19–21]. And the probe was immersed into 3.5 wt% NaCl aqueous solution. The results of SVET were the ion potential difference of local oxidation-reduction reaction on the specimen surface, and the data were converted to local current density according to the specification of data processing in instrument.The SVET current density maps and the statistical analysis of the data were performed with Origin software. The current densities were displayed in three-dimensional (3D) maps, showing the spatial distribution of the current density as a function of the (x,y) position in the scan region. The current values in the SVET map are positive for anodic currents and negative for cathodic currents. The contour map of the current densities is at the bottom of the 3D maps.The integrated anodic current (IInt) was used to characterize the corrosion resistance of different microstructure. IInt was evaluated by integration of the overall anodic current (iA) on SVET current density map. The whole scan area was split into 21×21 small squares, and we calculated the scan area (S) and number (n) of measurement points in each microstructure. The scan area of WZ, overheated zone (OZ), normalized zone (NZ), incomplete normalized zone (INZ), and BM, respectively, was 4.9, 2.2, 2.5, 0.4, and 5.0 mm2, and n of WZ, OZ, NZ, INZ, and BM, respectively, was 142, 56, 74, 20, and 149. We calculated the anodic current on each microstructure, and calculation formula is shown by(1)Iint=S∑iAn (see [22]) where iA is the anodic current density (iA>0) measurement points in each microstructure.


## 2.2.1. Hardness Analysis

Microhardness test was conducted through a nanoindentation measuring device (type: HVS 1000). The test force was 1 Kgf and the force duration was 10 s. The distance between each point was 0.5 mm. The connection between hardness value and microstructure is very close. The hardness is very important in mechanical properties of the materials.


## 2.2.2. Microstructure Analysis

The micro-images of cross section were shown in Figure2, which exhibited that joint had good welding quality. Microstructure samples were machined with 10 mm×10 mm×5 mm, which ensured that the specimen contained base metal (BM), heat affected zone (HAZ), and weld zone (WZ). Prior to microstructure testing, the sample was polished sequentially with the number of 120, 240, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 emery papers and then polished to the mirror with 1.5 mm diamond paste. After drying, the specimen was etched by a mixture of 4% nitric acid and ethanol (weight fraction). The sample was dried with air compressor; microstructure of the sample was observed with metalloscope.Figure 2
Cross section macro-images of the weld joint.


## 2.2.3. Corrosion Behavior Analysis

All sides of the specimen were embedded in an epoxy resin except the exposure surface, and the working area was 14 mm×14 mm. Polish the face of the specimen, clean the surface with anhydrous ethanol, and dry it with air compressor. Subsequently, the SVET measurements were conducted through a PAR370 Scanning Electrochemical Workstation. The SVET test was adopted by the Versa SCAN electrochemical scanning system, and the scanning microprobe was a Pt-Ir microelectrode with a diameter of 50 um. At the beginning of the test, the sample was placed in the electrolytic cell, and the surface of the sample remained horizontal.The scanning probe vibrated in the perpendicular direction at the surface of the sample, and the distance between the probe and sample surface was 100 um. The vibrating amplitude of the microelectrode was 30 um and the vibrating frequency was 50 Hz in the direction to the surface. The scanning area was 5 mm × 3 mm, and it scanned from weld zone to base metal.SVET measurements were carried out in electrochemical corrosion testing apparatus at room temperature in 3.5wt% NaCl solution [19–21]. And the probe was immersed into 3.5 wt% NaCl aqueous solution. The results of SVET were the ion potential difference of local oxidation-reduction reaction on the specimen surface, and the data were converted to local current density according to the specification of data processing in instrument.The SVET current density maps and the statistical analysis of the data were performed with Origin software. The current densities were displayed in three-dimensional (3D) maps, showing the spatial distribution of the current density as a function of the (x,y) position in the scan region. The current values in the SVET map are positive for anodic currents and negative for cathodic currents. The contour map of the current densities is at the bottom of the 3D maps.The integrated anodic current (IInt) was used to characterize the corrosion resistance of different microstructure. IInt was evaluated by integration of the overall anodic current (iA) on SVET current density map. The whole scan area was split into 21×21 small squares, and we calculated the scan area (S) and number (n) of measurement points in each microstructure. The scan area of WZ, overheated zone (OZ), normalized zone (NZ), incomplete normalized zone (INZ), and BM, respectively, was 4.9, 2.2, 2.5, 0.4, and 5.0 mm2, and n of WZ, OZ, NZ, INZ, and BM, respectively, was 142, 56, 74, 20, and 149. We calculated the anodic current on each microstructure, and calculation formula is shown by(1)Iint=S∑iAn (see [22]) where iA is the anodic current density (iA>0) measurement points in each microstructure.


## 3. Result and Discussion

### 3.1. The Hardness of the CMT Twin Welded Joint

The distribution of hardness in welded joint is shown in Figure3. It can be shown that the hardness values of the welded joint are symmetric distribution as a centre of the welded zone. It can be concluded that the welded joint shows relatively uniform fluctuations of hardness in BM, and the value is maintained at about 275 HV. In the vicinity of the heat affected zone, the hardness of BM decreases to a certain extent, which is due to the growth of grain on the edge of the HAZ.Figure 3
The distribution of the hardness in the welded joint.The hardness of the HAZ in Figure3 rises relatively fast, where the troostite has a high hardness (about 310 ~ 332 HV). Simultaneously, the decrease of troostite near the WZ leads to further decrease of the hardness on the edge of the HAZ. And the amplitude of descent in hardness is little lower than that of the BM, as presented in Figure 3. It can be shown in Figure 3 that the welded joint shows obvious hardness fluctuation in HAZ, which reveals the inhomogeneous microstructure of HAZ. This leads to heavy corrosion for HAZ in 3.5% NaCl solution. However, the hardness of the HAZ is determined by the tendency of brittleness in the BM and the cooling speed of the HAZ. This means that the brittleness and hardness of the BM are determined by the chemical composition, while the cooling rate of the HAZ is mainly affected by the welding specification. Generally, the chemical composition of the BM is certain, and the hardness of the HAZ can only be improved by changing the cooling rate after welding. It can be confirmed that the microstructure of the WZ consists of the bainite and a small amount of acicular ferrite, and the hardness is kept at 285 HV, slightly higher than that of the BM.


### 3.2. Microstructure of the Welded Joint

It can be shown in Figure4(a) that the microstructure of BM consists of a mixture of ferrite with low carbon slabs and carbide. Meanwhile, the same size of the bainite is parallel with arrangement in direction, which formed the bainite-rich region. The microstructure of lower bainite (LB) is mostly featured with the lath ferrite (F), and from the austenite grain boundary to the intragranular one the parallel growth of ferrite is shown. Simultaneously, the short rod-like black product with intermittent is cementite, which exists in lath ferrite. Moreover, it can be shown in Figure 4 that the welded joint shows obvious crystal boundary of austenite in BM, and the distribution of ferrite is very homogeneous. Specifically, the grain orientation in the region is larger, and plenty of bainite regions are formed.Figure 4
The microstructure of BM, INZ, NZ, OZ, and WZ.
(a) (b) (c) (d)Figure4(b) shows optical micrographs of the cross section of the different welding regions (incomplete normalized zone (INZ) and NZ) of the welded joint. It can be shown that the troostite (black substance) is precipitated out of the coarse bainite in HAZ, and it gradually diffuses into the BM. It obviously detects the diffusion process of the troostite in INZ, while NZ is completely covered by the troostite (T). This means that this zone has high mechanical properties (hardness and strength).Figure4(c) shows the microstructure of OZ, in which the upper left corner is WZ. It can be seen that the microstructure adjacent to WZ is relatively coarse and the grain boundary is clear. Moreover, the microstructure adjacent to the fusion line shows that the microstructure of the welded zone is relatively finer compared with the BM, and there also exists black granular troostite in the grain boundary of austenite (A). In the area of BM adjacent to WZ, it can be clearly shown that the microstructure of the BM is basically perpendicular to the fusion line, and bainite (B) becomes longer. In HAZ, the grain boundary of austenite is obvious, and the microstructure of HAZ is obviously more coarse than that of BM, as presented in Figure 4. Owing to the lower heat input and high speed of cooling after welding, massive bainite with a high density dislocation is formed with dispersive distribution of carbide. The appearance of bainite presents a thin strip and a series of slabs are arranged in parallel. As a result, the same direction bainite grows to form a regional strip, and the slabs of the bainite intersect each other.Figure4(d) presents the microstructure of WZ; it can be shown in Figure 4(c) that the microstructure is finer. After magnification, the granular bainite (M-A constituent) is distributed homogeneously. It is well known that the cooling rate greatly affected the formation of granular bainite. The cooling rate influences the growth of factors such as the generation of a significantly quenched hardening structure. Moreover, the low cooling rate increases the austenitic isothermal time, which is favorable for the short-range diffusion of carbon atoms. The quantity of the carbon concentrated in the primary austenite will be suppressed, being affected by the welding heat input, when the bainite ferrite is generated during the bainite transformation. The bainite ferrite formation is prevented by the primary austenite, while the carbon concentration reached a critical value. Therefore, the residual austenite transforms into the M-A island that is distributed within the ferrite matrix. Subsequently, the lath and granular bainite microstructures are generated. Therefore, a large number of small M-A islands are distributed evenly in ferrite matrix. In the process of granular bainite formation, ferrite with precipitating out of austenite firstly is featured with the shape of lath. Meanwhile, lath ferrite with high dislocation density leads to high strength of materials. Owing to the hard phase of M-A islands, the M-A islands are precipitated by way of small and dispersed precipitation. Indeed, the interaction between M-A islands and the dislocation hinders the dislocation movement. In other words, the way of dispersion strengthening improves the strength of the steel.


### 3.3. Corrosion Behavior of the CMT Twin Welded Joint

The corrosion of low carbon alloy steel in 3.5% NaCl solution is typical electrochemical corrosion. When low carbon alloy steel is immersed in 3.5% NaCl solution, the distribution of components, phase, and the surface stress of surface in material are not uniform. Indeed, the distribution of electrode potential between material surface and interface of water is inhomogeneous on the microscale. There are countless corrosion microcells on the surface of the metal, resulting in the corresponding anode and cathode areas. The anode is an active dissolving reaction, namely, Fe-2e =Fe2+. In the meantime, the corrosive particles in the environment are mainly O2 and Cl-, in which the concentration of oxygen is consistent, and the cathode is the depolarization reaction of oxygen, namely, O2+2H2O+4e=4OH-. Therefore, the corrosion rate of the materials may be accelerated by influencing the adsorption behavior of the corrosive Cl-. Furthermore, Cl- is a characteristic adsorption ion, which is able to form a chemical bond of coordination with metal and adsorb on the surface of the metal. This effect usually causes the change of charge on the metal surface.


### 3.4. SVET Current Density Maps

The SVET current density maps for various periods in 3.5% NaCl solution are demonstrated in Figure5. Simultaneously, the boundary lines of different microstructure were displayed in X axis. The anodic current appeared at different sites, and the anodic area is mainly located at the BM in 0 hour (Figure 5(a)). The 0 hour is the time for SVET to scan the once.Figure 5
SVET current density maps of (a) 0 h, (b) 2 h, (c) 4 h, and (d) 6 h.
(a) (b) (c) (d)At the beginning of time (0 h), the corrosion resistance of the BM and HAZ is worse. In addition, due to the influence of the heat input during the process of welding, there is obvious differentiation of microstructure between BM and WZ. There is obvious potential difference between the WZ and BM, resulting in galvanic corrosion. Following this, the cathode region appears in the WZ and thus is protected. In the meantime, the microstructure in the HAZ is relatively coarse. As a result, the corrosion resistance of the WZ is better than BM. The microstructure of WZ consists of the granular bainite (M-A constituent), as presented in Figure4. Granular bainite consists of a mixture of ferrite and austenite, and ferrite is surrounded by austenite. In addition, phase transition temperature of bainite is low, and the diffusion ability of alloy elements is relatively worse. Therefore, the uniform bainite reduces the potential difference between the anode and cathode. Thus, it is indicated that the corrosion rate reduces to some extent, especially the tendency of localized corrosion. In addition, grain boundary of bainite is small angle grain boundary, and interfacial energy can be lower, and the impurity content of grain boundary is low, making it shows excellent corrosion resistance.It has been established that, with the increase of time (2 h), the SVET current density in anode region and cathode region decreases. In the initial period of corrosion, the unstable product Fe(OH)2 is formed on the surface of the sample, which to some extent inhibits the process of anodic dissolution of the corrosion reaction, thus reducing the corrosion rate [23]. The anodic current density peak appears in BM, and the area of higher anode current significantly reduces. In the meantime, the cathodic area appears in the HAZ, and the number significantly increases. When time is 4 h, the anodic current density peak appears in WZ. In other words, the anode area is moved from BM to the WZ. Owing to the porous structure of the new rust layer, the rust layer cannot provide adequate protection, so the rust layer on the sample surface is continuously increasing, as shown in Figures 5(b)–5(d). When the corrosion time is 6 h, the peak current area and quantity of the anode decrease gradually. Thus, it means that the corrosion rate of the whole regional greatly reduces, and there are only scattered anode current peaks at the edge of the weld zone. The cathode region appears in HAZ and the BM, which improves the corrosion resistance of the two regions.


### 3.5. Current Peak of Anodic and Cathodic

It is possible to go further and attempt to extract more information from the SVET results. As shown in Figure6, it can be observed that the welded joint exhibits the current peak of anodic (iA,max), cathodic (iC,max), and the average current density (iAve) in SVET maps. It can be seen from the graph that the peak of cathode current and anode current are decreasing gradually, while the average current is moving around zero. The test of corrosion was conducted without external polarization, so the anodic currents and cathodic currents are balanced and the net current should be zero. In general, the current peak of cathode and anode should be equal in value, and the average current density should be zero. However, the difference between the anode and cathode current peaks in SVET maps results in an average current deviation of zero. The reason for this deviation may be that the current density of the SVET maps is not measured at the same time. In the process of scanning, corrosion behavior and current distribution are constantly changing. As shown in Figures 5(a)–5(d), the current density of different microstructure varies considerably with the increase of corrosion time. This shows that the process of electrochemical is instantaneous, which changes at any time.Figure 6
The current peak of anodic (iA,max), cathodic (iC,max), and the average current density (iAve) in SVET maps.


### 3.6. Corrosion Behavior of Different Zone

Integrated anodic current of different microstructure is as shown in Figure7. It shows that the integrated anodic current (IInt) of OZ and BM is larger than that of WZ in the whole corrosion process. Combined with SVET maps, the corrosion tendency of microstructure in WZ is relatively high and the corrosion rate is low. At the same time, the degree of corrosion in WZ is lower than that of BM. As the iron dissolves, the integrated anodic current in BM and OZ decreases gradually. Moreover, the corrosion products decrease the corrosion rate of WZ and BM. Due to the coarse microstructure in HAZ, the integrated anodic current increases (0-2 h). With the oxidation of Fe(OH)2, the integrated anodic current of BM and OZ increases slightly (2-4 h). As the size of microstructure varies, IInt in the BM decreases, while IInt in OZ is relatively stable (4-6 h). Generally, the size of the integrated anodic current reflects the corrosion rate of different regions. With the formation of corrosion products, the corrosion rate of NZ gradually decreases (2-6 h). The weld zone is protected by the cathode and the degree of corrosion is little. Compared with the NZ, the corrosion resistance of the INZ is enhanced, which is due to the decrease of the amount of the troostite.Figure 7
Integrated cathodic current (IInt) of different microstructure.


### 3.7. Macro Analysis of Welded Joint after Corrosion

The macroscopic appearance of different corrosion times in welded joint is demonstrated in Figure8. Figure 8(a) reveals that different degrees of corrosion occurred in the BM, WZ, and HAZ. That is to say, the results are in agreement with the distribution of current density maps (Figure 5(a)). The white corrosion products, including Fe(OH)2, are mainly distributed in the HAZ and the zone adjacent to the HAZ (BM and WZ). In the WZ, the white corrosion products, which are away from the area of HAZ, gradually decrease. Moreover, on the right of Figure 8(a), the coarse microstructure of HAZ leads to lesser corrosion product.Figure 8
The macroscopic appearance of different corrosion time.
(a) (b) (c) (d)When corrosion time is 2 h, white corrosion products disappeared, and a few corrosion products (Fe(OH)2) with rufous appear. Furthermore, it is apparent that the boundary of the HAZ and the BM basically disappeared. That is to say, the corrosion products of the BM and the HAZ are obviously more than the WZ. It is revealed that Fe(OH)2 is easily oxidized to products of gray-green. The products of rufous are mainly concentrated in the HAZ, and the BM has fewer corrosion products and the least ones in WZ, as presented in Figure 8(c). When corrosion time is 6 h, there are obvious differences in WZ, HAZ, and BM. Figure 8(d) shows the corrosion degree of WZ is the minimum, and the corrosion resistance is excellent. Furthermore, the corrosion products in BM have not been completely oxidized, and some corrosion products of white (Fe(OH)2) exist.As Figure8 shows, the corrosion degree of each region is not uniform at any time. The grains of granular bainite in WZ are finer and evenly distributed, and the distribution of microstructure is uniform. It is well known that the content of granular bainite is high in Q690. In addition, the small cathode and large anode lead to reducing the corrosion rate of WZ in the process of corrosion. As shown in Figure 8, the WZ displays the excellent corrosion resistance. On the contrary, the HAZ with coarse microstructure exhibits the worst corrosion resistance. It may also be that nickel increases the corrosion resistance of the weld area. As shown in Table 1, there are more nickel elements in the weld zone, in comparison with BM. The study shows that the addition of nickel can form a protective rust layer on the surface, thus improving the corrosion resistance of the welded zone [24]. Ni has ability to resist the corrosive action of Cl− ions. Accordingly, Ni exhibits high corrosion resistance in 3.5% NaCl solution. This indicates that, as a result of Ni in the welded zone, the aggressive action of Cl− ions on the surface is suppressed. This behavior exhibits very important result that the Ni has influence on corrosion resistance in 3.5% NaCl solution.In summary, it can be discovered that the corrosion rates of various zone are associated with the welding heat input. From this perspective, the corrosion degree of microstructure is mainly HAZ > BM >WZ.


## 3.1. The Hardness of the CMT Twin Welded Joint

The distribution of hardness in welded joint is shown in Figure3. It can be shown that the hardness values of the welded joint are symmetric distribution as a centre of the welded zone. It can be concluded that the welded joint shows relatively uniform fluctuations of hardness in BM, and the value is maintained at about 275 HV. In the vicinity of the heat affected zone, the hardness of BM decreases to a certain extent, which is due to the growth of grain on the edge of the HAZ.Figure 3
The distribution of the hardness in the welded joint.The hardness of the HAZ in Figure3 rises relatively fast, where the troostite has a high hardness (about 310 ~ 332 HV). Simultaneously, the decrease of troostite near the WZ leads to further decrease of the hardness on the edge of the HAZ. And the amplitude of descent in hardness is little lower than that of the BM, as presented in Figure 3. It can be shown in Figure 3 that the welded joint shows obvious hardness fluctuation in HAZ, which reveals the inhomogeneous microstructure of HAZ. This leads to heavy corrosion for HAZ in 3.5% NaCl solution. However, the hardness of the HAZ is determined by the tendency of brittleness in the BM and the cooling speed of the HAZ. This means that the brittleness and hardness of the BM are determined by the chemical composition, while the cooling rate of the HAZ is mainly affected by the welding specification. Generally, the chemical composition of the BM is certain, and the hardness of the HAZ can only be improved by changing the cooling rate after welding. It can be confirmed that the microstructure of the WZ consists of the bainite and a small amount of acicular ferrite, and the hardness is kept at 285 HV, slightly higher than that of the BM.


## 3.2. Microstructure of the Welded Joint

It can be shown in Figure4(a) that the microstructure of BM consists of a mixture of ferrite with low carbon slabs and carbide. Meanwhile, the same size of the bainite is parallel with arrangement in direction, which formed the bainite-rich region. The microstructure of lower bainite (LB) is mostly featured with the lath ferrite (F), and from the austenite grain boundary to the intragranular one the parallel growth of ferrite is shown. Simultaneously, the short rod-like black product with intermittent is cementite, which exists in lath ferrite. Moreover, it can be shown in Figure 4 that the welded joint shows obvious crystal boundary of austenite in BM, and the distribution of ferrite is very homogeneous. Specifically, the grain orientation in the region is larger, and plenty of bainite regions are formed.Figure 4
The microstructure of BM, INZ, NZ, OZ, and WZ.
(a) (b) (c) (d)Figure4(b) shows optical micrographs of the cross section of the different welding regions (incomplete normalized zone (INZ) and NZ) of the welded joint. It can be shown that the troostite (black substance) is precipitated out of the coarse bainite in HAZ, and it gradually diffuses into the BM. It obviously detects the diffusion process of the troostite in INZ, while NZ is completely covered by the troostite (T). This means that this zone has high mechanical properties (hardness and strength).Figure4(c) shows the microstructure of OZ, in which the upper left corner is WZ. It can be seen that the microstructure adjacent to WZ is relatively coarse and the grain boundary is clear. Moreover, the microstructure adjacent to the fusion line shows that the microstructure of the welded zone is relatively finer compared with the BM, and there also exists black granular troostite in the grain boundary of austenite (A). In the area of BM adjacent to WZ, it can be clearly shown that the microstructure of the BM is basically perpendicular to the fusion line, and bainite (B) becomes longer. In HAZ, the grain boundary of austenite is obvious, and the microstructure of HAZ is obviously more coarse than that of BM, as presented in Figure 4. Owing to the lower heat input and high speed of cooling after welding, massive bainite with a high density dislocation is formed with dispersive distribution of carbide. The appearance of bainite presents a thin strip and a series of slabs are arranged in parallel. As a result, the same direction bainite grows to form a regional strip, and the slabs of the bainite intersect each other.Figure4(d) presents the microstructure of WZ; it can be shown in Figure 4(c) that the microstructure is finer. After magnification, the granular bainite (M-A constituent) is distributed homogeneously. It is well known that the cooling rate greatly affected the formation of granular bainite. The cooling rate influences the growth of factors such as the generation of a significantly quenched hardening structure. Moreover, the low cooling rate increases the austenitic isothermal time, which is favorable for the short-range diffusion of carbon atoms. The quantity of the carbon concentrated in the primary austenite will be suppressed, being affected by the welding heat input, when the bainite ferrite is generated during the bainite transformation. The bainite ferrite formation is prevented by the primary austenite, while the carbon concentration reached a critical value. Therefore, the residual austenite transforms into the M-A island that is distributed within the ferrite matrix. Subsequently, the lath and granular bainite microstructures are generated. Therefore, a large number of small M-A islands are distributed evenly in ferrite matrix. In the process of granular bainite formation, ferrite with precipitating out of austenite firstly is featured with the shape of lath. Meanwhile, lath ferrite with high dislocation density leads to high strength of materials. Owing to the hard phase of M-A islands, the M-A islands are precipitated by way of small and dispersed precipitation. Indeed, the interaction between M-A islands and the dislocation hinders the dislocation movement. In other words, the way of dispersion strengthening improves the strength of the steel.


## 3.3. Corrosion Behavior of the CMT Twin Welded Joint

The corrosion of low carbon alloy steel in 3.5% NaCl solution is typical electrochemical corrosion. When low carbon alloy steel is immersed in 3.5% NaCl solution, the distribution of components, phase, and the surface stress of surface in material are not uniform. Indeed, the distribution of electrode potential between material surface and interface of water is inhomogeneous on the microscale. There are countless corrosion microcells on the surface of the metal, resulting in the corresponding anode and cathode areas. The anode is an active dissolving reaction, namely, Fe-2e =Fe2+. In the meantime, the corrosive particles in the environment are mainly O2 and Cl-, in which the concentration of oxygen is consistent, and the cathode is the depolarization reaction of oxygen, namely, O2+2H2O+4e=4OH-. Therefore, the corrosion rate of the materials may be accelerated by influencing the adsorption behavior of the corrosive Cl-. Furthermore, Cl- is a characteristic adsorption ion, which is able to form a chemical bond of coordination with metal and adsorb on the surface of the metal. This effect usually causes the change of charge on the metal surface.


## 3.4. SVET Current Density Maps

The SVET current density maps for various periods in 3.5% NaCl solution are demonstrated in Figure5. Simultaneously, the boundary lines of different microstructure were displayed in X axis. The anodic current appeared at different sites, and the anodic area is mainly located at the BM in 0 hour (Figure 5(a)). The 0 hour is the time for SVET to scan the once.Figure 5
SVET current density maps of (a) 0 h, (b) 2 h, (c) 4 h, and (d) 6 h.
(a) (b) (c) (d)At the beginning of time (0 h), the corrosion resistance of the BM and HAZ is worse. In addition, due to the influence of the heat input during the process of welding, there is obvious differentiation of microstructure between BM and WZ. There is obvious potential difference between the WZ and BM, resulting in galvanic corrosion. Following this, the cathode region appears in the WZ and thus is protected. In the meantime, the microstructure in the HAZ is relatively coarse. As a result, the corrosion resistance of the WZ is better than BM. The microstructure of WZ consists of the granular bainite (M-A constituent), as presented in Figure4. Granular bainite consists of a mixture of ferrite and austenite, and ferrite is surrounded by austenite. In addition, phase transition temperature of bainite is low, and the diffusion ability of alloy elements is relatively worse. Therefore, the uniform bainite reduces the potential difference between the anode and cathode. Thus, it is indicated that the corrosion rate reduces to some extent, especially the tendency of localized corrosion. In addition, grain boundary of bainite is small angle grain boundary, and interfacial energy can be lower, and the impurity content of grain boundary is low, making it shows excellent corrosion resistance.It has been established that, with the increase of time (2 h), the SVET current density in anode region and cathode region decreases. In the initial period of corrosion, the unstable product Fe(OH)2 is formed on the surface of the sample, which to some extent inhibits the process of anodic dissolution of the corrosion reaction, thus reducing the corrosion rate [23]. The anodic current density peak appears in BM, and the area of higher anode current significantly reduces. In the meantime, the cathodic area appears in the HAZ, and the number significantly increases. When time is 4 h, the anodic current density peak appears in WZ. In other words, the anode area is moved from BM to the WZ. Owing to the porous structure of the new rust layer, the rust layer cannot provide adequate protection, so the rust layer on the sample surface is continuously increasing, as shown in Figures 5(b)–5(d). When the corrosion time is 6 h, the peak current area and quantity of the anode decrease gradually. Thus, it means that the corrosion rate of the whole regional greatly reduces, and there are only scattered anode current peaks at the edge of the weld zone. The cathode region appears in HAZ and the BM, which improves the corrosion resistance of the two regions.


## 3.5. Current Peak of Anodic and Cathodic

It is possible to go further and attempt to extract more information from the SVET results. As shown in Figure6, it can be observed that the welded joint exhibits the current peak of anodic (iA,max), cathodic (iC,max), and the average current density (iAve) in SVET maps. It can be seen from the graph that the peak of cathode current and anode current are decreasing gradually, while the average current is moving around zero. The test of corrosion was conducted without external polarization, so the anodic currents and cathodic currents are balanced and the net current should be zero. In general, the current peak of cathode and anode should be equal in value, and the average current density should be zero. However, the difference between the anode and cathode current peaks in SVET maps results in an average current deviation of zero. The reason for this deviation may be that the current density of the SVET maps is not measured at the same time. In the process of scanning, corrosion behavior and current distribution are constantly changing. As shown in Figures 5(a)–5(d), the current density of different microstructure varies considerably with the increase of corrosion time. This shows that the process of electrochemical is instantaneous, which changes at any time.Figure 6
The current peak of anodic (iA,max), cathodic (iC,max), and the average current density (iAve) in SVET maps.


## 3.6. Corrosion Behavior of Different Zone

Integrated anodic current of different microstructure is as shown in Figure7. It shows that the integrated anodic current (IInt) of OZ and BM is larger than that of WZ in the whole corrosion process. Combined with SVET maps, the corrosion tendency of microstructure in WZ is relatively high and the corrosion rate is low. At the same time, the degree of corrosion in WZ is lower than that of BM. As the iron dissolves, the integrated anodic current in BM and OZ decreases gradually. Moreover, the corrosion products decrease the corrosion rate of WZ and BM. Due to the coarse microstructure in HAZ, the integrated anodic current increases (0-2 h). With the oxidation of Fe(OH)2, the integrated anodic current of BM and OZ increases slightly (2-4 h). As the size of microstructure varies, IInt in the BM decreases, while IInt in OZ is relatively stable (4-6 h). Generally, the size of the integrated anodic current reflects the corrosion rate of different regions. With the formation of corrosion products, the corrosion rate of NZ gradually decreases (2-6 h). The weld zone is protected by the cathode and the degree of corrosion is little. Compared with the NZ, the corrosion resistance of the INZ is enhanced, which is due to the decrease of the amount of the troostite.Figure 7
Integrated cathodic current (IInt) of different microstructure.


## 3.7. Macro Analysis of Welded Joint after Corrosion

The macroscopic appearance of different corrosion times in welded joint is demonstrated in Figure8. Figure 8(a) reveals that different degrees of corrosion occurred in the BM, WZ, and HAZ. That is to say, the results are in agreement with the distribution of current density maps (Figure 5(a)). The white corrosion products, including Fe(OH)2, are mainly distributed in the HAZ and the zone adjacent to the HAZ (BM and WZ). In the WZ, the white corrosion products, which are away from the area of HAZ, gradually decrease. Moreover, on the right of Figure 8(a), the coarse microstructure of HAZ leads to lesser corrosion product.Figure 8
The macroscopic appearance of different corrosion time.
(a) (b) (c) (d)When corrosion time is 2 h, white corrosion products disappeared, and a few corrosion products (Fe(OH)2) with rufous appear. Furthermore, it is apparent that the boundary of the HAZ and the BM basically disappeared. That is to say, the corrosion products of the BM and the HAZ are obviously more than the WZ. It is revealed that Fe(OH)2 is easily oxidized to products of gray-green. The products of rufous are mainly concentrated in the HAZ, and the BM has fewer corrosion products and the least ones in WZ, as presented in Figure 8(c). When corrosion time is 6 h, there are obvious differences in WZ, HAZ, and BM. Figure 8(d) shows the corrosion degree of WZ is the minimum, and the corrosion resistance is excellent. Furthermore, the corrosion products in BM have not been completely oxidized, and some corrosion products of white (Fe(OH)2) exist.As Figure8 shows, the corrosion degree of each region is not uniform at any time. The grains of granular bainite in WZ are finer and evenly distributed, and the distribution of microstructure is uniform. It is well known that the content of granular bainite is high in Q690. In addition, the small cathode and large anode lead to reducing the corrosion rate of WZ in the process of corrosion. As shown in Figure 8, the WZ displays the excellent corrosion resistance. On the contrary, the HAZ with coarse microstructure exhibits the worst corrosion resistance. It may also be that nickel increases the corrosion resistance of the weld area. As shown in Table 1, there are more nickel elements in the weld zone, in comparison with BM. The study shows that the addition of nickel can form a protective rust layer on the surface, thus improving the corrosion resistance of the welded zone [24]. Ni has ability to resist the corrosive action of Cl− ions. Accordingly, Ni exhibits high corrosion resistance in 3.5% NaCl solution. This indicates that, as a result of Ni in the welded zone, the aggressive action of Cl− ions on the surface is suppressed. This behavior exhibits very important result that the Ni has influence on corrosion resistance in 3.5% NaCl solution.In summary, it can be discovered that the corrosion rates of various zone are associated with the welding heat input. From this perspective, the corrosion degree of microstructure is mainly HAZ > BM >WZ.


## 4. Conclusions

The microstructure, hardness, and corrosion behavior in welded joint of Q690, which was welded with CMT Twin, were studied. The experimental findings support the following major conclusions:( 1 ) The hardness of the base metal was the minimum, while the hardness of weld zone with tiny microstructure was higher than that of the base metal. Owing to the coarse microstructure, the hardness of overheated zone decreased. The hardness of normalized zone increased with the appearance of the troostite.( 2 ) As the corrosion time increases, the corrosion products of different microstructure were identical, and the white products of the welded joint were turned into products of rufous. In the role of oxygen, Fe(OH)2 was oxidized to Fe(OH)3. Also, the overheated zone and the base metal presented a high corrosion rate. The degree of corrosion in weld zone, which is protected by the cathode, was mild. The corrosion resistance of the weld zone with CMT Twin was greatly improved compared with that of the base metal. This was related to the existence of nickel.



---

*Source: 2368717-2018-07-04.xml*