# Impact of Antenna Selection on Physical-Layer Security of NOMA Networks

Authors: Dan Deng; Chao Li; Lisheng Fan; Xin Liu; Fasheng Zhou
Journal: Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

This paper studies the impacts of antenna selection algorithms in decode-and-forward (DF) cooperative nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) networks, where the secure information from the relay can be overheard by an eavesdropper in the networks. In order to ensure the secure transmission, an optimal antenna selection algorithm is proposed to choose one best relay’s antenna to assist the secure transmission. We study the impact of antenna selection on the system secure communication through deriving the analytical expression of the secrecy outage probability along with the asymptotic expression in the high regime of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and main-to-eavesdropper ratio (MER). From the analytical and asymptotic expressions, we find that the system secure performance is highly dependent on the system parameters such as the number of antennas at the relay, SNR, and MER. In particular, the secrecy diversity order of the system is equal to the antenna number, when the interference from the second user is limited.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent years, the wireless data rate has been explosively increasing [1–4], and many wireless services have been emerging, which requires the rapid development of wireless transmission [5–8]. As one of the most promising techniques, nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) provides superhigh data rate over the orthogonal multiple access, and hence it has been recognized as one candidate for the next-generation wireless communication networks [9, 10].Moreover, NOMA has been demonstrated to be compatible with other emerging technologies [11–14]. In particular, the impact of imperfect self-interference cancellation for full-duplex cooperative NOMA is investigated in [12], while authors in [13] study the combination of NOMA and relay selection and results show that the proposed strategy can provide maximal diversity gain. Considering multiple sources, relay sharing scheme is proposed in [14] and results show that the proposed scheme outperforms OMA under perfect or imperfect SIC.Due to the broadcast nature of wireless transmission, it is of vital importance to guarantee the transmission security from the application layer [15–19] to physical layer [20, 21]. The authors in [22] provided the framework of wiretap channels, which gives a general way to analyze and design the secure physical-layer security. In general, the performances of secure communications is affected by many wireless channel parameters, such as the channel correlation [23–25] and fading characteristics [26–28]. Recently, researchers turned to study the physical-layer security for NOMA communication systems. In [29], the authors proposed the transmission antenna selection for NOMA systems with multiple antennas, in order to ensure the secure communication. The authors in [30] optimized the secrecy sum rate of multiple users, in order to optimize the system design. Moreover, the authors in [31] investigated the downlink NOMA communication systems and proposed a secure beamforming algorithm to enhance the physical-layer security.To further enhance the physical-layer security of NOMA systems, researchers proposed the spatial selection, such as antenna selection or relay selection [32]. The authors in [33] extended this work into amplify-and-forward (AF) and decode-and-forward (DF) modes and devised a novel relay selection scheme which consists of two stages. The analytical results in this paper depicted that the proposed scheme outperformed the conventional relay selection schemes. The authors in [34] studied the NOMA system over Nakagami-m fading channels and verified that relay selection could enhance the wireless security for the fixed-gain relaying mode. In [13], the authors applied the relay selection technique into NOMA systems with multiple relays and demonstrated that the proposed scheme could achieve the maximum secrecy diversity gain. Moreover, the authors in [14] studied the NOMA systems with multiple sources, and devised a relay sharing scheme which was demonstrated to outperform the conventional OMA with either perfect or imperfect SIC. In [35], the authors studied the NOMA communication systems with AF relay, and derived the analytical outage expression for the cooperative NOMA networks.However, as to the best of our knowledge, there are no literatures on the effects of the antenna selection algorithms on the secrecy outage probability for cooperative NOMA. Motivated by that, based on the optimal antenna selection algorithm, this paper studies the secrecy outage performance for decode-and-forward (DF) cooperative NOMA networks. (DF relay can decode the wireless signal before forwarding to the destination note, which can improve the link quality. While amplify-and-forward (AF) relay only amplifies its received signal and the link quality can not be improved. Considering the advantages of DF relay scheme compared with AF scheme, only DF cooperative network is studied in this paper.) By using NOMA protocol and with the help of the relay station, the source station transfers messages to two destinations simultaneously. The best antenna of relay is selected to assist the secure transmission from the source to the destinations. The impact of the system parameters is analyzed through deriving the exact analytical expressions on the secrecy outage performance as well as the asymptotic results with large SNR and main-to-eavesdropper ratio (MER). We find that the system secure performance is highly dependent on the system parameters such as the number of antennas at the relay, SNR, and MER. Specifically, the secrecy diversity order of the system is equal to the antenna number, when the interference from the second user is limited. Furthermore, simulation results are provided to validate the theoretical analysis.The main contributions of this paper are summarized as follows:(1)
An optimal antenna selection for cooperative NOMA networks is proposed and the closed-form exact expressions and the asymptotic expressions on the secrecy outage performance are derived.(2)
According to the asymptotic analysis, the impacts of the system parameters on the secrecy outage probability are revealed. We find that, in the case of limited interference, the secrecy diversity order of the system is equal to the antenna numberNotations. We use the notations log2(·) and ln(·) to represent the logarithms with the base of 2 and natural, respectively. Moreover, we use notations fX(x) and FX(x) to represent the probability density function and cumulative distribution function of the random variable X, respectively. Notation E(X) returns the expectation result of a random event X. In addition, x~CN(μ,σ2) indicates that the random variable x follows a circularly symmetric complex-valued Gaussian distribution of the mean μ and variance σ2. We use the notation R-D to denote the link from R to D.


## 2. System Model and Selection Algorithm

The system model of two-slot decode-and-forward (DF) cooperative NOMA networks is given in Figure1. The considered system consists of one source station, a DF relay with N antennas, two destinations, and one passive eavesdropper, denoted as S, R, {D1,D2}, and E, respectively. The relay station is equipped with N antennas, and we use {Rn,n∈[1,N]} to denote the n-th antenna of R. It is assumed that perfect channel status information (CSI) of hSRn, hRnD1, and hRnD1 can be obtained by the relay station through dedicated feedback channel [36–39]. Since the eavesdropper does not transmit any signal all the time [40], the relay cannot obtain the CSI of the eavesdropping links. Due to the long distance or severe shadow fading [41–43], there exists no direct link between the source and the destinations. Then with the assistant of the relay station, the source station can transfer messages to two destinations by using the NOMA protocol. Meanwhile, the wireless signal from the relay station may be intercepted by the eavesdropper. Both S and D are assumed to be equipped with a single antenna and operate in the half-duplex time-division mode. To reduce the information leakage to the eavesdropper, thebest antenna in R is selected to decode the signal and forward to the destinations. As mentioned before, the destinations share the wireless channel through NOMA protocol. In addition, all of the wireless channels are assumed to be quasi-static Rayleigh block fading and statistically independent of each other.Figure 1
Secure antenna selection for cooperative NOMA networks.In the first slot, a mixture signal is transmitted from the source station to the selected relay’s antenna. Thus, the received signal atn-th antenna of R can be expressed as(1)rRn=hSRnα1PSx1+α2PSx2+nRn,where x1, x2 are the messages transmitted from S to D1 and D2, respectively. nRn~CN(0,N0) is the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) received at Rn. We use PS to denote the total transmission power of the source station and use hSRn~CN(0,λ0) to represent the instantaneous channel fading coefficient between S and Rn. The power allocation factors for x1 and x2 are denoted by α1,α2, respectively. According to the NOMA protocol [13], low rate and urgent traffic are carried by the first data stream, while the second data stream x2 is used for opportunistic communications with long time tasks. To satisfy the total power requirement, α1 and α2 meet the following constraint: α1+α2=1 and α1>α2.In this paper, we assume that perfect successive interference cancellation (SIC) receiver [44, 45] is used at Rn. Thus, x2 is treated as interference before x1 is decoded. Therefore, the SINRs for x1 and x2 at Rn can be obtained as(2)SINRRn1=α1PSvnα2PSvn+σ2,and(3)SINRRn2=α2PSvnσ2,respectively, where vn=hSRn2 is used to denote the channel fading gain between S and Rn.Consequently, the achievable rate forx1 and x2 at Rn can be expressed as follows:(4)CRn1=12log21+SINRRn1=12log21+α1vnα2vn+1/ρS,and(5)CRn2=12log21+SINRRn2=12log21+α2ρSvn,where ρS=PS/N0.Both of the data streams, i.e.,x1 and x2, are decoded by the selected antenna in the second slot and forwarded to the destinations. Meanwhile, the wireless signal from the relay may be overheard by the passive eavesdropper. Given that Rn is selected and the received signal at D2 and E can be given as (6)rD2=hRnD2α1PRx1+α2PRx2+nD2,(7)rE=hRnEα1PRx1+α2PRx2+nE,where hRnD2~CN(0,λ2), hRnE~CN(0,λE) are the instantaneous channel fading coefficient of Rn-D2 and Rn-E links, respectively, PR is the transmission power of Rn, nD2~CN(0,N0), and nE~CN(0,N0) denote the AWGN received at D2 and E, respectively.Moreover, it is assumed that SIC receiver is used at bothD2 and E. That is, x2 is treated as noise when they are trying to decode x1. Thus, the achievable rates of x1 at D2 and E are given as (4)(8)CD21=12log21+SINRD21=12log21+α1unα2un+1/ρR,(9)CE1=12log21+SINRE1=12log21+α1gnα2gn+1/ρR,where un=hRnD22 and gn=hRnE2 denote the channel fading gain of links Rn-D2 and Rn-E, respectively, and ρR=PR/N0.Conditioned on thatx1 is decoded successfully, then the achievable rates of x2 at D2 and E can be expressed as(10)CD22=12log21+SINRD22=12log21+α2ρRun,and(11)CE2=12log21+SINRE2=12log21+α2ρRgn.Thus, the secrecy capacity of the relaying system can be written as [46](12)CS=CD22-CE2+,where [x]+=max{x,0}.Based on the theoretical analysis on the secrecy capacity, in order to minimize the secrecy outage probability of cooperative NOMA system, an optimal antenna selection algorithm is proposed in the following section.The correctly decoding antenna subset is defined in the first step of the proposed algorithm as follows:(13)SD=n:n∈1,N,SINRRn1≥γ1,SINRRn2≥γ2,with(14)γ1=22R1-1,γ2=22R2-1,where R1 and R2 denote the minimum rate requirements for x1 and x2, respectively.It is easy to prove that bothCD2(1) and CD2(2) are monotone increasing functions with respect to un. In the second step of the selection algorithm, since the relay has no CSI of the eavesdropper, the optimal antenna selection algorithm can be performed as follows:(15)n∗=argmaxn∈SDun.


## 3. Performance Analysis

In this section, the theoretical analysis on the secrecy outage probability for the cooperative NOMA networks will be derived, as well as the asymptotic results. From the analysis, a deep insight on the effects of the system parameters, such as the antenna number and the power allocation factors, on the outage performance is present.


### 3.1. Exact Expression on Secrecy Outage Probability

In this section, the outage probability of the first step in (13) is analyzed. Given that relay antenna Rn is randomly selected, Hn is defined as the probability that Rn belongs to the decoding antenna subset SD. By substituting (4) and (5) into (13), we have (16)Hn=PrRn∈SD=PrSINRRn1≥γ1,SINRRn2≥γ2=e-c3/ρSλ0,with(17)c1=γ1α1-α2γ1,c2=γ2α2,c3=maxc1,c2.Note that whenγ1≥α1/α2, no antenna can decode x1 correctly, and the outage occurs definitely. Thus, we only need to consider the case that γ1<α1/α2.We useSD to denote the size of subset SD. Because of the statistical independence between S-Rn links, the probability that SD equals M can be written as(18)PrSD=M=NMHnM1-HnN-M=NMe-c3/ρSλ0M1-e-c3/ρSλ0N-M.In particular, the outage probability that the size ofSD equals zero can be given as(19)PrSD=0=1-e-γm/γsβN.We turn to consider the performance of the second step in (15), given that Rn is selected. The scenarios of successful secrecy transmission can be divided into two cases as follows. The first case is that both D2 and E can decode x1 successfully, and the secrecy capacity is better than the minimum requirement simultaneously. The probability of the first case can be given as (20)Pn,1=PrCD21≥R1,CE1≥R1,CS≥RS=PrCD21≥R1,CE1≥R1,CD22-CE2≥RS.By applying necessary mathematical derivation and substituting (8), (9), (10), and (11) into (20), we obtain(21)Pn,1=Prun≥gnγS+c4ρR,gn≥c1ρR,where γS=22RS and c4=(γS-1)/α2.The second case is thatE cannot decode x1 correctly, but D2 can. In this case, the secrecy capacity equals the achievable rate of x2 at D2. The probability of the second case can be written as(22)Pn,2=PrCD21≥R1,CE1<R1,CD22≥RS.Similarly, substituting (8), (9), and (10) into (22), we obtain(23)Pn,2=Prun≥c5ρR,gn<c1ρR.Using the full probability formula, the outage probability of this step can be calculated as(24)PO,n,M=1-Pn,1-Pn,2,where M>0 is the size of the decoding antenna subset.Thus, the secrecy outage probability of the cooperative NOMA system forRn is(25)PO,n=PrSD=0+∑M=1NPrSD=MPO,n,M.According to the order statistics [47], the CDF of un∗ can be expressed as(26)Fun∗x=Prun∗<x=Prun<x,n∈SD.Due to the independence of channel fading gains un, the cumulative distribution function can be rewritten as(27)Fun∗x=∏n=1MPrun<x=1-e-x/λ2M.By using the binomial theorem on (27), we obtain(28)Fun∗x=1-∑k=1MMk-1k-1e-kx/λ2.Using the analysis result in (28), the probability density function of un∗ can be expressed as(29)fun∗x=∑k=1MMk-1k-1kλ2e-kx/λ2.Sinceun is independent of gn, the PDF of gn∗ remains the same with that of gn; i.e.,(30)fgn∗x=fgnx=1λEe-x/λE.By applying (29) and (30) on (21) and (23), we have(31)Pn∗,1=∑k=1MMk-1k-1c6,kλEe-c7,k/ρR,with(32)c6,k=1λE+kγSλ2,c7,k=c1c6,k+kc4λ2,and(33)Pn∗,2=1-e-c1/ρRλE∑k=1MMk-1k-1e-kc3/ρRλ2.Using (31) and (33), PO,n∗,M in (24) and the secrecy outage probability in (25) for the optimal antenna selection can be expressed as in (34). (34)PO,n∗=PrSD=0+∑M=1NPr⁡SD=MPO,n∗,M=PrSD=0+∑M=1NPr⁡SD=M·1-∑k=1MMk-1k-1c6,kλEe-c7,k/ρR-1-e-c1/ρRλE∑k=1MMk-1k-1e-kc3/ρRλ2.The details about the numerical computation and associated analysis can be found in the literature, such as the works [48–52] or [53–56].


### 3.2. Asymptotic Outage Probability Analysis

We present the asymptotic analysis in this section to reveal a deep insight on the effects of the system parameters on the outage probability. The asymptotic analysis focuses on the system behavior when the noise can be neglected. In this case, the main contribution or the bottleneck of the system performance can be revealed. Based on the asymptotic analysis, we can propose the optimization scheme on the system parameters. According to the asymptotic results, we can show behavior of the outage performance when both the transmission and the main-to-eavesdropper ratio (MER) are large enough.Firstly, we give the definition of MER, which denotes the ratio of average fading power ofhRnD2 to that of hRnE; i.e.,(35)μ=λ2λE.Lemma 1.
Given the definition of functionG(M,k)=∑m=1MMm(-1)mmk, we have the following equation:(36)GM,k=0,∀k=1,2,…,M-1.Proof.
See AppendixA.Lemma 2.
Given the definition of functionAN=∑k=0NNk((-1)k/1+kδ), if δ→0, we have the following approximation result:(37)AN≈-δNGN,N.Proof.
See AppendixB.Consider the asymptotic expression ofPn∗,1 in (31). By using the approximation that ex=1+x, we have (38)P^n∗,1=1-Pn∗,1≈1-∑k=1MMk-1k-1c6,kλE1-c7,kρR=1-∑k=1MMk-1k-11+kγSλE/λ21-c7,kρR.Then, by using Lemma 2, we obtain(39)P^n∗,1=1-∑k=1MMk-1k-11+kγSλE/λ21-c7,kρR=-γSμMGM,M+∑k=1MMk-1k1+kγS/μc7,kρR=-γSμMGM,M+c1ρRγE.Similarly, consider the asymptotic expression ofPn∗,2 in (33), and using the approximation 1-e-x=x yields(40)Pn∗,2≈c1ρRλE∑k=1MMk-1k-1e-kc3/ρRλ2≈c1ρRλE∑k=1MMk-1k-11-kc3ρRλ2≈c1ρRλE∑k=1MMk-1k-1=c1ρRλE.WhenρS→∞, the asymptotic result of (18) can be given as(41)PrSD=M≈NMe-c3/ρSλ0Mc3ρSλ0N-M≈NMc3ρSλ0N-M.Specifically, whenM=0, we have(42)PrSD=0≈c3ρSλ0N.By substituting (39), (40), and (41) into (34), we can get the asymptotic expression on the outage probability(43)PO,n∗=c3ρSλ0N+∑M=1NNMc3ρSλ0N-M-γSμMGM,M.Particularly, when the system is interference limited, i.e.,N0=0, we get(44)PO,n∗≈∑M=1NNMc3ρSλ0N-M-γSμMGM,M≈-γSμNGN,N.From the asymptotic expression in (43) and (44), we can have the following remarks. (a) The asymptotic expression of the secrecy outage probability is jointly determined by the SNR, MER, and the antenna number. (b) For the interference limited system, the secrecy outage probability is only determined by the MER, and the diversity order of the outage probability equals the number of the antennas.


## 3.1. Exact Expression on Secrecy Outage Probability

In this section, the outage probability of the first step in (13) is analyzed. Given that relay antenna Rn is randomly selected, Hn is defined as the probability that Rn belongs to the decoding antenna subset SD. By substituting (4) and (5) into (13), we have (16)Hn=PrRn∈SD=PrSINRRn1≥γ1,SINRRn2≥γ2=e-c3/ρSλ0,with(17)c1=γ1α1-α2γ1,c2=γ2α2,c3=maxc1,c2.Note that whenγ1≥α1/α2, no antenna can decode x1 correctly, and the outage occurs definitely. Thus, we only need to consider the case that γ1<α1/α2.We useSD to denote the size of subset SD. Because of the statistical independence between S-Rn links, the probability that SD equals M can be written as(18)PrSD=M=NMHnM1-HnN-M=NMe-c3/ρSλ0M1-e-c3/ρSλ0N-M.In particular, the outage probability that the size ofSD equals zero can be given as(19)PrSD=0=1-e-γm/γsβN.We turn to consider the performance of the second step in (15), given that Rn is selected. The scenarios of successful secrecy transmission can be divided into two cases as follows. The first case is that both D2 and E can decode x1 successfully, and the secrecy capacity is better than the minimum requirement simultaneously. The probability of the first case can be given as (20)Pn,1=PrCD21≥R1,CE1≥R1,CS≥RS=PrCD21≥R1,CE1≥R1,CD22-CE2≥RS.By applying necessary mathematical derivation and substituting (8), (9), (10), and (11) into (20), we obtain(21)Pn,1=Prun≥gnγS+c4ρR,gn≥c1ρR,where γS=22RS and c4=(γS-1)/α2.The second case is thatE cannot decode x1 correctly, but D2 can. In this case, the secrecy capacity equals the achievable rate of x2 at D2. The probability of the second case can be written as(22)Pn,2=PrCD21≥R1,CE1<R1,CD22≥RS.Similarly, substituting (8), (9), and (10) into (22), we obtain(23)Pn,2=Prun≥c5ρR,gn<c1ρR.Using the full probability formula, the outage probability of this step can be calculated as(24)PO,n,M=1-Pn,1-Pn,2,where M>0 is the size of the decoding antenna subset.Thus, the secrecy outage probability of the cooperative NOMA system forRn is(25)PO,n=PrSD=0+∑M=1NPrSD=MPO,n,M.According to the order statistics [47], the CDF of un∗ can be expressed as(26)Fun∗x=Prun∗<x=Prun<x,n∈SD.Due to the independence of channel fading gains un, the cumulative distribution function can be rewritten as(27)Fun∗x=∏n=1MPrun<x=1-e-x/λ2M.By using the binomial theorem on (27), we obtain(28)Fun∗x=1-∑k=1MMk-1k-1e-kx/λ2.Using the analysis result in (28), the probability density function of un∗ can be expressed as(29)fun∗x=∑k=1MMk-1k-1kλ2e-kx/λ2.Sinceun is independent of gn, the PDF of gn∗ remains the same with that of gn; i.e.,(30)fgn∗x=fgnx=1λEe-x/λE.By applying (29) and (30) on (21) and (23), we have(31)Pn∗,1=∑k=1MMk-1k-1c6,kλEe-c7,k/ρR,with(32)c6,k=1λE+kγSλ2,c7,k=c1c6,k+kc4λ2,and(33)Pn∗,2=1-e-c1/ρRλE∑k=1MMk-1k-1e-kc3/ρRλ2.Using (31) and (33), PO,n∗,M in (24) and the secrecy outage probability in (25) for the optimal antenna selection can be expressed as in (34). (34)PO,n∗=PrSD=0+∑M=1NPr⁡SD=MPO,n∗,M=PrSD=0+∑M=1NPr⁡SD=M·1-∑k=1MMk-1k-1c6,kλEe-c7,k/ρR-1-e-c1/ρRλE∑k=1MMk-1k-1e-kc3/ρRλ2.The details about the numerical computation and associated analysis can be found in the literature, such as the works [48–52] or [53–56].


## 3.2. Asymptotic Outage Probability Analysis

We present the asymptotic analysis in this section to reveal a deep insight on the effects of the system parameters on the outage probability. The asymptotic analysis focuses on the system behavior when the noise can be neglected. In this case, the main contribution or the bottleneck of the system performance can be revealed. Based on the asymptotic analysis, we can propose the optimization scheme on the system parameters. According to the asymptotic results, we can show behavior of the outage performance when both the transmission and the main-to-eavesdropper ratio (MER) are large enough.Firstly, we give the definition of MER, which denotes the ratio of average fading power ofhRnD2 to that of hRnE; i.e.,(35)μ=λ2λE.Lemma 1.
Given the definition of functionG(M,k)=∑m=1MMm(-1)mmk, we have the following equation:(36)GM,k=0,∀k=1,2,…,M-1.Proof.
See AppendixA.Lemma 2.
Given the definition of functionAN=∑k=0NNk((-1)k/1+kδ), if δ→0, we have the following approximation result:(37)AN≈-δNGN,N.Proof.
See AppendixB.Consider the asymptotic expression ofPn∗,1 in (31). By using the approximation that ex=1+x, we have (38)P^n∗,1=1-Pn∗,1≈1-∑k=1MMk-1k-1c6,kλE1-c7,kρR=1-∑k=1MMk-1k-11+kγSλE/λ21-c7,kρR.Then, by using Lemma 2, we obtain(39)P^n∗,1=1-∑k=1MMk-1k-11+kγSλE/λ21-c7,kρR=-γSμMGM,M+∑k=1MMk-1k1+kγS/μc7,kρR=-γSμMGM,M+c1ρRγE.Similarly, consider the asymptotic expression ofPn∗,2 in (33), and using the approximation 1-e-x=x yields(40)Pn∗,2≈c1ρRλE∑k=1MMk-1k-1e-kc3/ρRλ2≈c1ρRλE∑k=1MMk-1k-11-kc3ρRλ2≈c1ρRλE∑k=1MMk-1k-1=c1ρRλE.WhenρS→∞, the asymptotic result of (18) can be given as(41)PrSD=M≈NMe-c3/ρSλ0Mc3ρSλ0N-M≈NMc3ρSλ0N-M.Specifically, whenM=0, we have(42)PrSD=0≈c3ρSλ0N.By substituting (39), (40), and (41) into (34), we can get the asymptotic expression on the outage probability(43)PO,n∗=c3ρSλ0N+∑M=1NNMc3ρSλ0N-M-γSμMGM,M.Particularly, when the system is interference limited, i.e.,N0=0, we get(44)PO,n∗≈∑M=1NNMc3ρSλ0N-M-γSμMGM,M≈-γSμNGN,N.From the asymptotic expression in (43) and (44), we can have the following remarks. (a) The asymptotic expression of the secrecy outage probability is jointly determined by the SNR, MER, and the antenna number. (b) For the interference limited system, the secrecy outage probability is only determined by the MER, and the diversity order of the outage probability equals the number of the antennas.


## 4. Simulation Results

In this section, we provide numerical results to verify the theoretical analysis, which shows the impacts of the system parameters, such as MER (μ), the number of antennas (N), the power allocation factor (α1), and the rate requirement (RS,R2) on the secrecy outage probability as well as the asymptotic results. The Rayleigh fading channels are used in our simulation cases for all links in the NOMA relaying networks. Without loss of generality, in all simulation cases, we set that the transmission power of the relay is the same as that of the source station.As a function of SNR (ρS), the effects of N on the outage probability is shown in Figure 2 with μ=24dB. We set γS=60dB, R1=R2=1bps/Hz, RS=0.1bps/Hz, and λ0=10, and the antenna number changes from 1 to 3. From this figure, we can see that large N can introduce extra freedom the wireless fading channels, which can improve the outage probability with low SNR region. Also, when SNR grows to be large enough, an error floor occurs for the outage probability, which is determined by the MER and the antenna number. The reason is that when SNR approaches infinity, the bottleneck of the system performance is the interference introduced by NOMA protocol.Figure 2
Secrecy outage probability versus SNRρS with different N.Figure3 shows the effects of λ0 on the outage probability as a function of SNR. The value of λ0 changes from 1, 5 to 10. From this figure, we find that large λ0 means that the average fading power of the first slot is large, which can obviously enlarge the size of the decoding antenna subset SD. Thus, the secrecy outage probability can be reduced.Figure 3
Secrecy outage probability versus SNRρS with different λ0.Figure4 shows the effects of power allocation factor α1 on the outage probability as a function of SNR. The value of α1 changes as 0.8, 0.9, and 0.95. Under this configuration, we can see that small α1 can get better system performance. The reason is that, in this case, the bottleneck is the capacity of data stream x2. Small α1 means more power can be allocated for x2, which can improve the secrecy outage probability.Figure 4
Secrecy outage probability versus SNRρS with different α1.The effects ofR2 on the outage probability are depicted in Figure 5 with RS=0.1bps/Hz as a function of SNR. The value of R2 changes from 1.0 and 1.5 to 2.0 bps/Hz. Since small R2 can enlarge the size of SD, large freedom for the second hop can be obtained to improve the secure performance. Thus, we can see from the figure that small R2 can significantly improve the outage performance.Figure 5
Secrecy outage probability versus SNRρS with different R2.As a function of MERμ, the analytical SOP in (34) and (44) for cooperative NOMA system is present in Figure 6. Considering the interference limited scenarios, we set γS=60dB, R1=R2=1bps/Hz, RS=0.1bps/Hz, and λ0=10, and the number of antennas N increases from 1 to 3. From this figure, it is seen that the analytical SOP curves match the simulation SOP curves well in all regions, while, in the high SNR region, the simulation SOP curves converge to that of the asymptotic line. The accuracy of the theoretical analysis can be verified in all the simulation cases. Furthermore, we find that the diversity order of the outage probability is equal to the number of the antennas.Figure 6
Secrecy outage probability versus MERμ.The effects ofμ on the outage probability with N=2 is shown in Figure 7. We can see that, in high SNR region, all lines approach an error floor, and small μ results in worse outage performance. The reason is that μ denotes the average fading power of the main-to-eavesdropper ration, and large μ can lower the outage probability of the system.Figure 7
Secrecy outage probability versus SNRρS with different μ.Figure8 shows the effects of RS on the outage probability with μ=24dB as a function of SNR. The other parameters are set as the same as Figure 7. The value of RS is set as 0.1 and 0.4. We can see from the figure that small RS can lower the outage probability, which is consistent with intuition.Figure 8
Secrecy outage probability versus SNRρS with different RS.


## 5. Conclusion

In this paper, we propose an optimal antenna selection algorithm to enhance the secure performance for DF cooperative NOMA networks. The exact analytical expressions on the secrecy outage performance are derived, as well as the asymptotic results in the high regime of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and main-to-eavesdropper ratio (MER). From the analytical and asymptotic expressions, we find that the system secure performance is highly dependent on the system parameters such as the number of antennas at the relay, SNR, and MER. Specifically, the secrecy diversity order of the system is equal to the antenna number, when the interference from the second user is limited. In the future works, we will incorporate other wireless transmission techniques such as the works in [57–61], in order to further enhance the system performance and ensure the secure communications.



---

*Source: 2390834-2018-07-03.xml*