# PTEN Inhibits Cell Proliferation, Promotes Cell Apoptosis, and Induces Cell Cycle Arrest via Downregulating the PI3K/AKT/hTERT Pathway in Lung Adenocarcinoma A549 Cells

Authors: Xiao-Xiao Lu; Lan-Yu Cao; Xi Chen; Jian Xiao; Yong Zou; Qiong Chen
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

PTEN plays an essential role in tumorigenesis and both its mutation and inactivation can influence proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression in tumor cells. However, the precise role ofPTEN in lung cancer cells has not been well studied. To address this, we have generated lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells overexpressing wild-type or mutantPTEN as well as A549 cells expressing a siRNA directed toward endogenousPTEN. Overexpression of wild-typePTEN profoundly inhibited cell proliferation, promoted cell apoptosis, caused cell cycle arrest at G1, downregulated p-AKT, and decreased expression of the telomerase proteinhTERT. In contrast, in cells expressing aPTEN directed siRNA, the opposite effects on cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, p-AKT levels, andhTERT protein expression were observed. A549 cells transfected with aPTEN mutant lacking phosphatase activity (PTEN-C124A) or an empty vector (null) did not show any effect. Furthermore, using the PI3K/AKT pathway blocker LY294002, we confirmed that the PI3K/AKT pathway was involved in mediating these effects ofPTEN. Taken together, we have demonstrated thatPTEN downregulates the PI3K/AKT/hTERT pathway, thereby suppressing the growth of lung adenocarcinoma cells. Our study may provide evidence for a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Both oncogenes and tumor suppressors are potential targets in the field of tumor therapy. In organisms, the biological functions of oncogenes and antioncogenes mutually antagonize each other to regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, cell cycle, and angiogenesis. It has been found that dozens of genes are closely correlated with lung cancer, among which the oncogenePTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) and the tumor suppressorhTERT (human telomerase reverse transcriptase) have been extensively studied in the past few years [1–4].The tumor suppressor genePTEN encodes dual-specificity phosphatase that was first discovered in 1997 [5]. Inactivation ofPTEN is a key event in tumorigenesis and tumor development, and in fact it has the highest frequency of mutation in cancer after theP53 gene [6]. Currently, the tumor suppressing mechanism of thePTEN gene likely involves several candidate pathways, including the FAK pathway [7], the MAPK pathway [8, 9], and the PI3K/AKT pathway [10, 11]. Currently, the PI3K/AKT pathway is regarded as the key pathway by whichPTEN exerts its antioncogenic effects.PTEN encodes a protein with lipid phosphatase activity, which can dephosphorylate PIP3 (phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate) to form PIP2 (phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate), thereby preventing growth factor signal transduction pathways regulated by PI3K/AKT. As a result,PTEN activity in tumor cells results in cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase and induction of apoptosis [10–12]. Moreover, the PI3K/AKT pathway plays an important central role in tumor progression, and it is closely associated with other pathways which control a wide variety of tumor related biological processes. Studies have found that both the FAK pathway and the MAPK pathway exert effects through the PI3K/AKT pathway and affect the activity of AKT [7–9]. In a study of ovarian cancer, it was found that the FAK pathway mediated the activation of multiple downstream substrates of AKT such as NF-κB, promoted cell proliferation, and improved resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs [13].Numerous studies have shown that telomerase activation is another extremely important step in the pathogenesis of lung cancer, and this depends on the activity of thehTERT gene [14, 15]. Despite its importance, the mechanisms ofhTERT gene regulation have not been completely identified. However, it has been shown that there is a negative correlation betweenhTERT expression andPTEN expression in gastric cancer, liver cancer, and endometrial cancer [16].PTEN has been found to be able to inhibit the activity of telomerase. The activity of telomerase declined significantly when wild-typePTEN gene segments were transfected into glioblastoma cells expressing a mutated form ofPTEN. In addition, it was also shown in this study that thePTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway reduced the expression and function ofhTERT [17]. A recent study also demonstrated thatPTEN suppressed the phosphorylation of various tumor related proteins including hTERT through the PI3K/AKT pathway in renal cell carcinoma [18].Our previous study has also found that the proliferative capacity of lung adenocarcinoma cells was significantly reduced when the exogenous wild-typePTEN gene was introduced into A549/CDDP cells, which are resistant to cisplatin. Simultaneously, G1 phase arrest was observed and the A549/CDDP cells displayed a considerable improvement in sensitivity to cisplatin [19]. In light of the above, it is reasonable for us to presume that the mechanism by whichPTEN inhibits cell proliferation, promotes cell apoptosis, and induces cell cycle arrest in lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells may be related to the downregulation ofhTERT expression and that the PI3K/AKT pathway might be implicated in this process.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Cell Line and Cell Culture

The human lung adenocarcinoma cell line (A549) was purchased from the Cell Center of Xiangya Medical College of Central South University (Changsha, Hunan, China). Cells were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, CA, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100μg/mL streptomycin sulfate, and 2 mM glutamate in humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C.


### 2.2. Gene Transfection Technology

The null plasmid vector (pGFP), wild-typePTEN plasmid (pGFP-PTEN), and mutant-typePTEN plasmid (pGFP-PTEN-C124A) were generously supplied by Professor Kenneth M. Yamada, American National Institutes of Health. Plasmids were amplified by transformation inE. coli, extracted, and purified using a plasmid DNA extract kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). Insert sizes were confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis.PTEN small interfering RNA (PTEN-siRNA) expressing green fluorescence protein (GFP) were synthesized by Cell Signaling Technology Co. Ltd. (Danvers, MA, USA). Each plasmid or siRNA was mixed with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions and was added to cells at 50%–70% confluence. After 4 h of incubation, the transfection medium was discarded, cells were washed three times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and the media were then replaced with serum-containing medium. After 48 h, the transfection efficiency andPTEN gene expression were estimated by fluorescence microscopy and Western blot analysis, respectively.


### 2.3. MTT

A549 cells were trypsinized and seeded into 96-well plates at a density of approximately 4000 cells per well. Twenty-four hours later, adherent cells were transfected with pGFP, pGFP-PTEN, pGFP-PTEN-C124A, andPTEN-siRNA and/or exposed to PI3K/AKT inhibitor (LY294002 10 μM, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), nontransfected A549 cells served as the control group. During the following one to six days, MTT reagent (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added to the cells (20 μL (5 mg/mL) per well), and cells were then incubated for 4 h at 37°C. The cells media were removed and 150 μL of DMSO was added to each well followed by gentle shaking of the plates to dissolve the formazan crystals. The optical density (OD) was then measured using a microplate reader at 490 nm.


### 2.4. Flow Cytometry Assay

The A549 cell apoptosis rate (expressed as a percentage) and cell cycle stage were measured using a PI (Propidium Iodide) staining kit (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). Cells were collected and fixed in 70% ice cold ethanol overnight, stained with a mixture of PI and RNase in a 37°C water bath shielded from light for 30 min. Cells were then examined by fluorescence microscopy and the data were analyzed using WinMDI v 2.8 software.


### 2.5. Western Blot

A549 cells were trypsinized and washed three times with PBS before being lysed on ice for 30 min with RIPA lysis buffer containing protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). The lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 ×g at 4°C for 20 min. Protein concentrations were measured by the Bradford method. Total protein (50μg) for each sample was separated using 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred into polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Merck Millipore Inc., MA, USA) and blocked for 1 h in TBST containing 5% skimmed milk. Proteins of interests were detected by incubation with the appropriate antibodies at 4°C overnight. The primary antibodies used were as follows: mouse anti-human PTEN (1 : 100 dilution), rabbit anti-human p-AKT (1 : 500 dilution), and rabbit anti-human hTERT (1 : 500 dilution) (Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA). Secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Proteins were detected by ECL chemiluminescence. Image Lab 4.1 software was used to analyze the protein bands and relative protein expression level was normalized with reference to β-actin (Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA).


### 2.6. Real Time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Total RNA (1μg) was reverse transcribed using a Reverse Transcription kit according to the manufacturers protocol (Promega, WI, USA) (reaction at 42°C for 40 min and denaturation at 99°C for 5 min). cDNA (2 μL) was then amplified using the following conditions:PTEN: 30 cycles of denaturation for 50 s at 94°C; annealing for 45 s at 60°C; and extension for 7 min at 72°C andhTERT: 30 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C; annealing for 30 s at 60°C; and extension for 45 s at 72°C. The PCR product for each sample was separated by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis at 80 V. The β-actin or GAPDH mRNA expression level was employed as an internal control. The sequence of the primer pairs used is listed below:PTEN: 5′-GTAAGGACCAGAGACAAAAAG-3′ and 3′-CTTTTTTAGCATCTTGTTCTG-5′hTERT: 5′-TTTCTGGAGCTGCTTGGGAA-3′ and 3′-GAAGAGCCTGAGCAGCTCGA-5′β-Actin: 5′-TGAAGTGTGACGTGGACATC-3′ and 3′-GGAGGAGCAATGATCTTGAT-5′GAPDH: 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3′ and 3′-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-5′


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism 5 software was used for statistical analysis. All data were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Data in each group is presented as the mean ± standard deviation(χ±SD), and the difference between groups was analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) or a two-tailed Student’s t-test. p value less than 0.05 was counted as being statistically different.


## 2.1. Cell Line and Cell Culture

The human lung adenocarcinoma cell line (A549) was purchased from the Cell Center of Xiangya Medical College of Central South University (Changsha, Hunan, China). Cells were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, CA, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100μg/mL streptomycin sulfate, and 2 mM glutamate in humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C.


## 2.2. Gene Transfection Technology

The null plasmid vector (pGFP), wild-typePTEN plasmid (pGFP-PTEN), and mutant-typePTEN plasmid (pGFP-PTEN-C124A) were generously supplied by Professor Kenneth M. Yamada, American National Institutes of Health. Plasmids were amplified by transformation inE. coli, extracted, and purified using a plasmid DNA extract kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). Insert sizes were confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis.PTEN small interfering RNA (PTEN-siRNA) expressing green fluorescence protein (GFP) were synthesized by Cell Signaling Technology Co. Ltd. (Danvers, MA, USA). Each plasmid or siRNA was mixed with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions and was added to cells at 50%–70% confluence. After 4 h of incubation, the transfection medium was discarded, cells were washed three times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and the media were then replaced with serum-containing medium. After 48 h, the transfection efficiency andPTEN gene expression were estimated by fluorescence microscopy and Western blot analysis, respectively.


## 2.3. MTT

A549 cells were trypsinized and seeded into 96-well plates at a density of approximately 4000 cells per well. Twenty-four hours later, adherent cells were transfected with pGFP, pGFP-PTEN, pGFP-PTEN-C124A, andPTEN-siRNA and/or exposed to PI3K/AKT inhibitor (LY294002 10 μM, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), nontransfected A549 cells served as the control group. During the following one to six days, MTT reagent (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added to the cells (20 μL (5 mg/mL) per well), and cells were then incubated for 4 h at 37°C. The cells media were removed and 150 μL of DMSO was added to each well followed by gentle shaking of the plates to dissolve the formazan crystals. The optical density (OD) was then measured using a microplate reader at 490 nm.


## 2.4. Flow Cytometry Assay

The A549 cell apoptosis rate (expressed as a percentage) and cell cycle stage were measured using a PI (Propidium Iodide) staining kit (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). Cells were collected and fixed in 70% ice cold ethanol overnight, stained with a mixture of PI and RNase in a 37°C water bath shielded from light for 30 min. Cells were then examined by fluorescence microscopy and the data were analyzed using WinMDI v 2.8 software.


## 2.5. Western Blot

A549 cells were trypsinized and washed three times with PBS before being lysed on ice for 30 min with RIPA lysis buffer containing protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). The lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 ×g at 4°C for 20 min. Protein concentrations were measured by the Bradford method. Total protein (50μg) for each sample was separated using 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred into polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Merck Millipore Inc., MA, USA) and blocked for 1 h in TBST containing 5% skimmed milk. Proteins of interests were detected by incubation with the appropriate antibodies at 4°C overnight. The primary antibodies used were as follows: mouse anti-human PTEN (1 : 100 dilution), rabbit anti-human p-AKT (1 : 500 dilution), and rabbit anti-human hTERT (1 : 500 dilution) (Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA). Secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Proteins were detected by ECL chemiluminescence. Image Lab 4.1 software was used to analyze the protein bands and relative protein expression level was normalized with reference to β-actin (Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA).


## 2.6. Real Time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Total RNA (1μg) was reverse transcribed using a Reverse Transcription kit according to the manufacturers protocol (Promega, WI, USA) (reaction at 42°C for 40 min and denaturation at 99°C for 5 min). cDNA (2 μL) was then amplified using the following conditions:PTEN: 30 cycles of denaturation for 50 s at 94°C; annealing for 45 s at 60°C; and extension for 7 min at 72°C andhTERT: 30 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C; annealing for 30 s at 60°C; and extension for 45 s at 72°C. The PCR product for each sample was separated by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis at 80 V. The β-actin or GAPDH mRNA expression level was employed as an internal control. The sequence of the primer pairs used is listed below:PTEN: 5′-GTAAGGACCAGAGACAAAAAG-3′ and 3′-CTTTTTTAGCATCTTGTTCTG-5′hTERT: 5′-TTTCTGGAGCTGCTTGGGAA-3′ and 3′-GAAGAGCCTGAGCAGCTCGA-5′β-Actin: 5′-TGAAGTGTGACGTGGACATC-3′ and 3′-GGAGGAGCAATGATCTTGAT-5′GAPDH: 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3′ and 3′-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-5′


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism 5 software was used for statistical analysis. All data were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Data in each group is presented as the mean ± standard deviation(χ±SD), and the difference between groups was analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) or a two-tailed Student’s t-test. p value less than 0.05 was counted as being statistically different.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Effects of DifferentPTEN Phenotypes on A549 Cell Proliferation, Apoptosis, and Cell Cycle Progression

Our previous report demonstrated thatPTEN could regulate cell proliferation, cell cycle, and drug sensitivity to cisplatin in A549/CDDP cells. It has been documented that A549 cells express wild-typePTEN [20, 21]. To further investigate whether differentPTEN phenotypes have the same antitumor effect on A549 cells, vector alone (null), wild-typePTEN, a phosphatase-deadPTEN mutant (PTEN-C124A), andPTEN-siRNA were transfected separately into A549 cells using untransfected A549 cells as the control group. Cell proliferation was assessed using an MTT assay whereas cell apoptosis and cell cycle progression were assessed using a flow cytometry assay. As shown in Figure 1(a), the cell growth curves showed logarithmic growth from the first day to the fourth day; after this time, cell proliferation began to plateau. Over the first four days of growth, it was readily apparent that cell proliferation was suppressed in cells overexpressing wild-typePTEN compared to control cells. In contrast, cell proliferation in thePTEN-siRNA cells was significantly enhanced (p<0.05). Furthermore, there was no apparent change in cell proliferation in both the null cells and the phosphatase-deadPTEN cells compared with the control cells (p>0.05). The PI3K/AKT pathway can be blocked by using the AKT inhibitor LY294002. Our results showed that, in control cells, LY294002 treatment also suppressed cell proliferation. In contrast, the enhancement of proliferation seen in thePTEN-siRNA treated cells was blocked by LY294002 treatment.Figure 1
Effects of differentPTEN phenotypes on A549 cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression. A549 cells were transfected with pGFP (null), pGFP-PTEN (PTEN-wt), pGFP-phosphatase-deadPTEN (PTEN-C142A), orPTEN-siRNA in the presence or absence of LY294002 (10 μM) (PTEN-siRNA andPTEN-siRNA+LY294002). Untransfected A549 cells were used as the control group (con) and these cells were also treated with LY294002 (10 μM) (LY294002). Cell viability (a), the cellular apoptosis rate (b), and cell cycle progression (c) were measured by MTT and flow cytometry, respectively (p∗>0.05, p∗∗<0.05, p△<0.05, p#<0.05, p□>0.05, and p∘<0.05).
(a) (b) (c)The flow cytometry data demonstrated that the rate of cell apoptosis was significantly enhanced in cells overexpressing wild-typePTEN, compared with the control cells (15.6±1.14% versus 2.27±0.21%, p∗∗<0.05). LY294002 of control cells also increased the level of apoptosis to levels similar to those seen in wild-typePTEN overexpressing cells (10.36±2.7% versus 2.27±0.21%, p△<0.05). Similarly, compared with the control cells, there was an increased proportion of G0-G1 phase cells in the wild-typePTEN group (71.5±3.22% versus 47.5±1.03%, p∗∗<0.05) and LY294002 treatment of control cells also similarly increased the proportion of cells in the G0-G1 phase (63.1±2.64% versus 47.5±1.03%, p△<0.05). On the contrary, both the rate of cell apoptosis (0.55±0.15% versus 2.27±0.21%, p#<0.05) and the proportion of cells in the G0-G1 phase (30.5±1.89% versus 47.5±1.03%, p#<0.05) were significantly reduced in thePTEN-siRNA group compared to the control group. Treatment ofPTEN-siRNA cells with LY294002 attenuated both the decrease in rate of cell apoptosis (6.71±2.47 versus 0.55±0.15%, p∘<0.05) and the decrease in percent of cells in the G0-G1 phase (59.3±2.77% versus 30.5±1.89%, p∘<0.05) caused by thePTEN-siRNA. Moreover, compared with control group, there was no statistical difference in the rate of cell apoptosis for the null cells (2.13±0.36% versus 2.27±0.21%, p∗>0.05) or the phosphatase-deadPTEN cells (2.31±0.57% versus 2.27±0.21%, p□>0.05). Similar observations were made for the percentage of cells in the G0-G1 phase (45.6±2.22% (null) versus 47.5±1.03% (control), p∗>0.05, and 50.3±3.27% (phosphatase-deadPTEN) versus 47.5±1.03% (control), p□>0.05) (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)). These results suggested that wild-typePTEN, but not a phosphatase-deadPTEN mutant, was capable of suppressing cell proliferation, inducing cell apoptosis, and arresting the cell cycle in adenocarcinoma A549 cells and that the PI3K/AKT pathway possibly participated in these effects.


### 3.2.PTEN Negatively RegulateshTERT by Inhibiting the PI3K/AKT Pathway

As shown in Figure1, the role ofPTEN as a tumor suppressor in A549 cells has been convincingly demonstrated by its effects on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest. In light of previous reports showing thatPTEN can negatively regulatehTERT in hepatocellular carcinoma, renal carcinoma, and glioma cells and that PI3K/AKT acts downstream ofPTEN, we hypothesized thatPTEN might inhibit tumor progression by suppressing the PI3K/AKT/hTERT pathway.In order to investigate this hypothesis, we examined the mRNA and protein expression level ofPTEN,hTERT, and p-AKT in cells expressing different levels ofPTEN, or a phosphatase-deadPTEN mutant, along with the combination of treatment with PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitor LY294002. As shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(c), there was no detectable difference in the mRNA and protein expression level ofPTEN between the control group and the null plasmid transfected cells, which demonstrated that the plasmid vector did not affectPTEN expression. As expected, upregulation ofPTEN at both the mRNA and protein levels could be observed in cells transfected with wild-typePTEN as well as in cells transfected with the phosphatase-dead mutantPTEN. In cells transfected with aPTEN-siRNA, also as expected, lower levels ofPTEN could be detected at both the mRNA and protein levels. Treatment of cells with LY294002 did not affectPTEN expression, which we believe is evidence that PI3K/AKT is located downstream ofPTEN.Figure 2
PTEN negatively regulateshTERT by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT pathway. Untransfected A549 cells (con) or A549 cells transfected with either pGFP (null), pGFP-PTEN(wild-typePTEN), pGFP-PTEN-C124A (phosphatase-deadPTEN), orPTEN-siRNA and/or exposed to the AKT inhibitor (LY294002 10 μM) were examined for the expression ofPTEN (a) andhTERT (b) mRNA by RT-PCR, as well as for the protein levels ofPTEN, hTERT, and p-AKT (c) by Western blot.
(a) (b) (c)In this study, we also found that the mRNA and protein levels ofhTERT were considerably lower in A549 cells transfected with wild-typePTEN than in the control group (p<0.05). Conversely, dramatically elevatedhTERT mRNA and protein level could be observed in A549 cells transfected with aPTEN-siRNA compared to the control group (p<0.05). These results confirm thatPTEN also negatively regulateshTERT in lung adenocarcinoma cells. Although thePTEN mRNA and protein levels increased after A549 cells were transfected with the phosphatase-deadPTEN mutant (PTEN-C124A), this was not accompanied by a change inhTERT expression levels (p>0.05), confirming that the phosphatase-deadPTEN is nonfunctional and that only wild-typePTEN plays a role in suppressinghTERT expression (see Figures 2(b) and 2(c)).Intriguingly, we also found that, compared to control cells, the phosphorylation levels of AKT were decreased in cells overexpressing wild-typePTEN, while they were increased in cells transfected with aPTEN-siRNA. These data highlight the fact that PI3K/AKT is inhibited by wild-typePTEN but not by a phosphatase-dead mutantPTEN in these lung adenocarcinoma cells. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the PI3K/AKT pathway blocker LY294002 could mimic the effects of wild-typePTEN overexpression. Both the mRNA and the protein level ofhTERT were remarkably lower in A549 cells after exposure to LY294002 alone. Treatment of cells expressing aPTEN directed siRNA with LY294002 abrogated the upregulation ofhTERT expression caused by thePTEN-siRNA (p<0.05) (see Figures 2(b) and 2(c)). Collectively, these data, as well as previously published results, reveal that thePTENgene act as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting cell proliferation, promoting cell apoptosis, and inducing cell cycle arrest in human lung adenocarcinomain vitro and that these effects were somewhat mediated through a negative regulation of the PI3K/AKT/hTERT pathway.


## 3.1. Effects of DifferentPTEN Phenotypes on A549 Cell Proliferation, Apoptosis, and Cell Cycle Progression

Our previous report demonstrated thatPTEN could regulate cell proliferation, cell cycle, and drug sensitivity to cisplatin in A549/CDDP cells. It has been documented that A549 cells express wild-typePTEN [20, 21]. To further investigate whether differentPTEN phenotypes have the same antitumor effect on A549 cells, vector alone (null), wild-typePTEN, a phosphatase-deadPTEN mutant (PTEN-C124A), andPTEN-siRNA were transfected separately into A549 cells using untransfected A549 cells as the control group. Cell proliferation was assessed using an MTT assay whereas cell apoptosis and cell cycle progression were assessed using a flow cytometry assay. As shown in Figure 1(a), the cell growth curves showed logarithmic growth from the first day to the fourth day; after this time, cell proliferation began to plateau. Over the first four days of growth, it was readily apparent that cell proliferation was suppressed in cells overexpressing wild-typePTEN compared to control cells. In contrast, cell proliferation in thePTEN-siRNA cells was significantly enhanced (p<0.05). Furthermore, there was no apparent change in cell proliferation in both the null cells and the phosphatase-deadPTEN cells compared with the control cells (p>0.05). The PI3K/AKT pathway can be blocked by using the AKT inhibitor LY294002. Our results showed that, in control cells, LY294002 treatment also suppressed cell proliferation. In contrast, the enhancement of proliferation seen in thePTEN-siRNA treated cells was blocked by LY294002 treatment.Figure 1
Effects of differentPTEN phenotypes on A549 cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression. A549 cells were transfected with pGFP (null), pGFP-PTEN (PTEN-wt), pGFP-phosphatase-deadPTEN (PTEN-C142A), orPTEN-siRNA in the presence or absence of LY294002 (10 μM) (PTEN-siRNA andPTEN-siRNA+LY294002). Untransfected A549 cells were used as the control group (con) and these cells were also treated with LY294002 (10 μM) (LY294002). Cell viability (a), the cellular apoptosis rate (b), and cell cycle progression (c) were measured by MTT and flow cytometry, respectively (p∗>0.05, p∗∗<0.05, p△<0.05, p#<0.05, p□>0.05, and p∘<0.05).
(a) (b) (c)The flow cytometry data demonstrated that the rate of cell apoptosis was significantly enhanced in cells overexpressing wild-typePTEN, compared with the control cells (15.6±1.14% versus 2.27±0.21%, p∗∗<0.05). LY294002 of control cells also increased the level of apoptosis to levels similar to those seen in wild-typePTEN overexpressing cells (10.36±2.7% versus 2.27±0.21%, p△<0.05). Similarly, compared with the control cells, there was an increased proportion of G0-G1 phase cells in the wild-typePTEN group (71.5±3.22% versus 47.5±1.03%, p∗∗<0.05) and LY294002 treatment of control cells also similarly increased the proportion of cells in the G0-G1 phase (63.1±2.64% versus 47.5±1.03%, p△<0.05). On the contrary, both the rate of cell apoptosis (0.55±0.15% versus 2.27±0.21%, p#<0.05) and the proportion of cells in the G0-G1 phase (30.5±1.89% versus 47.5±1.03%, p#<0.05) were significantly reduced in thePTEN-siRNA group compared to the control group. Treatment ofPTEN-siRNA cells with LY294002 attenuated both the decrease in rate of cell apoptosis (6.71±2.47 versus 0.55±0.15%, p∘<0.05) and the decrease in percent of cells in the G0-G1 phase (59.3±2.77% versus 30.5±1.89%, p∘<0.05) caused by thePTEN-siRNA. Moreover, compared with control group, there was no statistical difference in the rate of cell apoptosis for the null cells (2.13±0.36% versus 2.27±0.21%, p∗>0.05) or the phosphatase-deadPTEN cells (2.31±0.57% versus 2.27±0.21%, p□>0.05). Similar observations were made for the percentage of cells in the G0-G1 phase (45.6±2.22% (null) versus 47.5±1.03% (control), p∗>0.05, and 50.3±3.27% (phosphatase-deadPTEN) versus 47.5±1.03% (control), p□>0.05) (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)). These results suggested that wild-typePTEN, but not a phosphatase-deadPTEN mutant, was capable of suppressing cell proliferation, inducing cell apoptosis, and arresting the cell cycle in adenocarcinoma A549 cells and that the PI3K/AKT pathway possibly participated in these effects.


## 3.2.PTEN Negatively RegulateshTERT by Inhibiting the PI3K/AKT Pathway

As shown in Figure1, the role ofPTEN as a tumor suppressor in A549 cells has been convincingly demonstrated by its effects on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest. In light of previous reports showing thatPTEN can negatively regulatehTERT in hepatocellular carcinoma, renal carcinoma, and glioma cells and that PI3K/AKT acts downstream ofPTEN, we hypothesized thatPTEN might inhibit tumor progression by suppressing the PI3K/AKT/hTERT pathway.In order to investigate this hypothesis, we examined the mRNA and protein expression level ofPTEN,hTERT, and p-AKT in cells expressing different levels ofPTEN, or a phosphatase-deadPTEN mutant, along with the combination of treatment with PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitor LY294002. As shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(c), there was no detectable difference in the mRNA and protein expression level ofPTEN between the control group and the null plasmid transfected cells, which demonstrated that the plasmid vector did not affectPTEN expression. As expected, upregulation ofPTEN at both the mRNA and protein levels could be observed in cells transfected with wild-typePTEN as well as in cells transfected with the phosphatase-dead mutantPTEN. In cells transfected with aPTEN-siRNA, also as expected, lower levels ofPTEN could be detected at both the mRNA and protein levels. Treatment of cells with LY294002 did not affectPTEN expression, which we believe is evidence that PI3K/AKT is located downstream ofPTEN.Figure 2
PTEN negatively regulateshTERT by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT pathway. Untransfected A549 cells (con) or A549 cells transfected with either pGFP (null), pGFP-PTEN(wild-typePTEN), pGFP-PTEN-C124A (phosphatase-deadPTEN), orPTEN-siRNA and/or exposed to the AKT inhibitor (LY294002 10 μM) were examined for the expression ofPTEN (a) andhTERT (b) mRNA by RT-PCR, as well as for the protein levels ofPTEN, hTERT, and p-AKT (c) by Western blot.
(a) (b) (c)In this study, we also found that the mRNA and protein levels ofhTERT were considerably lower in A549 cells transfected with wild-typePTEN than in the control group (p<0.05). Conversely, dramatically elevatedhTERT mRNA and protein level could be observed in A549 cells transfected with aPTEN-siRNA compared to the control group (p<0.05). These results confirm thatPTEN also negatively regulateshTERT in lung adenocarcinoma cells. Although thePTEN mRNA and protein levels increased after A549 cells were transfected with the phosphatase-deadPTEN mutant (PTEN-C124A), this was not accompanied by a change inhTERT expression levels (p>0.05), confirming that the phosphatase-deadPTEN is nonfunctional and that only wild-typePTEN plays a role in suppressinghTERT expression (see Figures 2(b) and 2(c)).Intriguingly, we also found that, compared to control cells, the phosphorylation levels of AKT were decreased in cells overexpressing wild-typePTEN, while they were increased in cells transfected with aPTEN-siRNA. These data highlight the fact that PI3K/AKT is inhibited by wild-typePTEN but not by a phosphatase-dead mutantPTEN in these lung adenocarcinoma cells. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the PI3K/AKT pathway blocker LY294002 could mimic the effects of wild-typePTEN overexpression. Both the mRNA and the protein level ofhTERT were remarkably lower in A549 cells after exposure to LY294002 alone. Treatment of cells expressing aPTEN directed siRNA with LY294002 abrogated the upregulation ofhTERT expression caused by thePTEN-siRNA (p<0.05) (see Figures 2(b) and 2(c)). Collectively, these data, as well as previously published results, reveal that thePTENgene act as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting cell proliferation, promoting cell apoptosis, and inducing cell cycle arrest in human lung adenocarcinomain vitro and that these effects were somewhat mediated through a negative regulation of the PI3K/AKT/hTERT pathway.


## 4. Discussion

Although it is well known that thePTEN gene plays a pivotal role in suppressing tumor development by negatively regulating thehTERT gene in multiple tumor cells, it remains to be discovered whether similar effects ofPTEN on thehTERT gene also occur in lung cancer. In this study, we focused on the human lung cancer A549 cell line and evaluated the function ofPTEN gene on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest by over- or underexpressing wild-typePTEN and comparing effects to those seen with phosphatase-dead mutantPTEN.Data from previous studies in glioma, endometrial cancer, and other tumors suggested that the exogenous wild-typePTEN gene can profoundly inhibit the growth of tumor cells, promote cellular apoptosis, and cause cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase [22–27]. Our study, in lung cancer cells, now also confirms these findings. Although the A549 cell line expresses low levels of thePTEN gene [28, 29], these levels can be further increased by transfection with the exogenous wild-typePTEN and this leads to suppression of cell proliferation. Bruni and his colleagues [30] found that the expression of exogenous wild-typePTEN can inhibit tumor growth independent of whether the cells express the endogenousPTEN gene or not and that the inhibitory effect is more obvious when the endogenousPTEN gene is completely deleted. On the contrary, cell proliferation and apoptosis are unchanged in A549 cells expressing a phosphatase-dead mutantPTEN gene (PTEN-C124A) [5, 31, 32]. These data highlight the fact that the phosphatase activity of thePTEN gene is indispensable for the effects ofPTEN on restraining cancer cell growth as well as promoting apoptosis.Here, we further analyzed the relationship between thePTEN andhTERT genes in A549 cells. The results showed that the mRNA and protein levels ofPTEN increased after transfection of lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells with the wild-typePTEN plasmid and that at the same timehTERT mRNA and protein expression levels were reduced. However, there were no obvious changes of thehTERT mRNA and protein expression observed in A549 cells transfected the mutant-typePTEN plasmid. In addition, we found that thehTERT mRNA and protein expression levels increased when thePTEN gene was silenced using aPTEN directed siRNA. These data suggest that the expression level ofhTERT is inversely associated with the activity of the wild-typePTEN gene.ThehTERT gene is considered to be the key rate limiting factor, which regulates the activity of telomerase, and its expression level may indirectly reflect the activity of telomerase. It plays a critical role in the process of development of tumor by inducing the clonal growth of cell by bypassing the process of replicative senescence thereby contributing to malignant immortalization [2, 14, 18]. An earlier study has reported that, in approximately 85% of people with cancer, telomerase activity could be detected in tumor tissues, whereas telomerase activity was detected in only about 4% of normal tissues adjacent to the tumor or in benign lesions [33]. Increased telomerase activity can suppress tumor cell apoptosis by affecting DNA stability and through signal transduction pathways [34]. Concordantly, it has also been demonstrated that the reduction ofhTERT expression using anhTERT siRNA inhibited telomerase activity and accelerated cell apoptosis in lung cancer [35], further strengthening our hypothesis thatPTEN suppresses the activity of telomerase by decreasing the expression ofhTERT, leading to the inhibition of cell proliferation and the promotion cell apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells.ThePTEN gene participates in a myriad of physiological and pathological processes and its biological effects mainly depend on its interaction with downstream signaling molecules. In view of the evidence that thePTEN-PI3K/AKT-hTERT axis is a commonly operative pathway in various carcinoma models, we presumed that the PI3K/AKT pathway might be implicated in the regulation ofhTERT byPTEN in lung cancer. Our results show that the levels of phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT) were reduced and that cell proliferation was inhibited in A549 cells overexpressing wild-typePTEN compared to control cells. The opposite effects were observed in cells transfected with aPTEN directed siRNA. In order to clarify if AKT plays a central role in this process, we used LY294002 a PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitor that inhibits the AKT pathway [36]. As expected, following LY294002 treatment, the AKT protein phosphorylation levels decreased. Importantly, LY294002 treatment of A549 cells decreased cellular proliferation, increased the apoptosis rate, and increased the percentage of cells arrested at G1. These effects were very similar in magnitude to those observed by overexpression ofPTEN itself. LY294002 treatment of cells expressing aPTEN directed siRNA also profoundly suppressed the enhanced cell proliferation, reduced cellular apoptosis, and decreased cell cycle arrest seen in thePTEN-siRNA transfected cells alone. Based on these data, we have verified that the PI3K/AKT pathway indeed plays a central role in the mediating of the effects of PTEN on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest in A549 cells.As an essential signal transduction protein, AKT plays a central role in the PI3K/AKT cell survival signaling pathway in cancer cells, and it also plays a crucial role in the cell survival mechanisms and signal transduction pathways mediating tumorigenesis. Only the phosphorylated form of AKT (namely, p-AKT) has biological activity [37]. This can be attributed to two factors. First, phosphorylated AKT prevents cell apoptosis by several mechanisms, including direct phosphorylation, the preapoptosis protein BAD, direct phosphorylation of the forkhead transcription factor FKHR-L1, and reducing the protease activity of caspase-9. AKT activation depends on the production of PIP3 by PI3K, andPTEN dephosphorylates PIP3 at the 3′ position, thereby preventing phosphorylation and activation of AKT and subsequently leading to the activation of downstream apoptosis signaling pathways and an increase in apoptosis [38–41]. Second,PTEN is also able to downregulate the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) by virtue of its protein phosphatase activity. In addition,PTEN can block the phosphorylation of CDKIs (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors) by AKT, allowing the entry of CDKIs into the nucleus and thereby suppressing the function of CDKs and impeding cell cycle progression [34, 42–44].In addition, data from our study showed thathTERT mRNA and protein expression were clearly reduced when we utilized LY294002 to block the PI3K/AKT pathway in A549 cells. This same reduction was also seen in A549 cells overexpressing wild-typePTEN. Treatment of A549 cells expressing aPTEN directed siRNA with LY294002 abrogated the upregulation ofhTERT expression seen in untreated cells. These data, along with the data on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest, show that inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway by LY294002 can mimic the anticancer effect of wild-typePTEN. In agreement with the present study, another study using the cervical cancer HeLa cell line treated with LY294002 showed that expression ofhTERT can also be affected by inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway. Another study in endometrial carcinoma also showed thatPTEN could reducehTERT mRNA expression by the PI3K/AKT pathway [45, 46]. Past studies have pointed out thathTERT, as a telomerase complex catalytic unit, can be activated in a variety of ways, including PKB/AKT phosphorylation [10]. Although the mechanism by which the PI3K/AKT pathway upregulates hTERT is unclear, it has been suggested that it could be mediated by direct phosphorylation of serine residues in hTERT by p-AKT [13].


## 5. Conclusions

In light of the above findings, we conclude that downregulation of the PI3K/AKT/hTERT pathway may be one of the mechanisms by which thePTEN gene can act as a tumor suppressor in lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells. Further studies in animal model will still be needed to pave the way for future lung cancer treatment and prevention strategies.



---

*Source: 2476842-2016-10-16.xml*