# Low-Cycle Fatigue Properties of the X70 High-Frequency Electric-Resistant Welded Pipes

Authors: Peng Tian; Kai Xu; Guang-ping Lu; Gui-ying Qiao; Fu-ren Xiao
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

The strength, toughness, corrosion, and fatigue resistance are the main requirements for evaluating the integrity of a pipeline. In this study, the tensile strength, impact toughness, and fatigue properties of the pipe body and weld joint of an X70 high-frequency electric-resistant welded (HFW) pipe were measured and the effects of microstructure and surface defects at weld joint on properties were discussed. Results show the appearance of a weakened zone at the weld joint of the X70 HFW pipe. Nevertheless, all mechanical properties, including strength and impact energy, were superior to the specified values of the API specifications for the X70 line pipe. The reduced strength, toughness, and resistance toS-N fatigue of the weld joint caused the microstructural coarsening at the weld junction zone. However, for the specimens without surface finishing, the resistance to S-N fatigue for the weld joint was further reduced. This phenomenon was mainly attributed to the burring defects and microstructural coarsening at the heat-affected zone (HAZ). Therefore, to improve the quality of the X70 HFW pipe, refining the microstructure of weld joint and reducing the deburring defects by optimizing the postweld heat treatment (PWHT) and deburring processes should be firstly considered in the future research works.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

High-frequency electric-resistant welded (HFW) pipe presents many benefits, such as higher dimensional tolerance and lower prices, compared with seamless pipe and submerged-arc welded pipe. HFW pipes have been successfully applied for oil and gas transport [1, 2]. However, the relatively low toughness of weld seam produced by HFW compared with other pipes severely limits the application of HFW in high-pressure gas transport. With the escalating gas consumption, the strength of pipeline steel should be improved to achieve high transmission efficiency and low operational costs. High-strength welded pipes necessitate high toughness to assure the operation security of high-pressure gas transmission pipelines [3, 4]. In recent years, the strength and toughness of HFW pipes have been significantly improved with the application of new technology [5–9]. High-strength HFW line pipe of API X70 and/or X80 grade is acceptable for use in extremely demanding and severe environments [10, 11].However, in practical applications, fatigue is a main failure mode for gas transmission pipes because of the wave loading caused by daily fluctuations in pressure, such as working pressure, that stop and start during the operation [12, 13]. Fatigue properties are some of the main requirements for evaluating the integrity of a pipeline [14]. Hence, the fatigue of pipeline steels and weld joints has been widely investigated [15–19]. However, previous studies mainly focused on the effect of microstructure on the fatigue crack propagation and the remaining life of steel and weld joint using standard fatigue test and/or numerical simulation [18, 19]. Fatigue processes involve crack initiation, propagation, and final fracture [20]. The total life of a cyclic loaded component with a flaw depends on the propagation rate of the flaw from its original size to a critical size. This process induces the final fracture. The major part of the life is expended during crack propagation in the near-threshold ΔK region [21]. Therefore, the life of crack initiation and propagation at the flaw in the near-threshold ΔK region determines the total life of a cyclic loaded component. The fatigue crack is usually generated at the structural and mechanical defects on the surface in the component because repeated loading induces continuous accumulation of localized irreversible slip at the stress concentration sites. This phenomenon eventually triggers material separation, that is, crack formation.In the modern pipeline design for oil and gas transmission, the submerged-arc welded pipes are prioritized over the HFW pipes. However, fatigue resistance frequently decreases at the weld joint of the pipes because of the strong stress concentration caused by the variation in chemical composition and microstructure between the weld metal and base metal, as well as the remaining weld reinforcement [22]. Hence, the weld joint of HFW pipes will have higher fatigue resistance because the weld joint does not have weld reinforcement. Meanwhile, the microstructure and mechanical properties can be improved by online postweld heat treatment (PWHT). In this study, these properties of an X70 HFW pipe were evaluated. The effects of the surface defects on the fatigue crack initiation were considered. The results will provide beneficial experimental data to improve the quality of the HFW pipe and expand its application.


## 2. Experiment Procedures

Hot-rolled API X70 microalloyed steel strips with 7.9 mm thickness were welded by HFW to fabricate a pipeline with 457 mm external diameter. The chemical composition of the X70 steel is provided in Table1. The main manufacturing process of the X70 HFW pipes includes forming, HFW, deburring, online postweld heat treatment (PWHT), and so on. The welding speed of 15 m/min, extrusion of 8%, and heat input of 520 kW were employed in HFW processes. The normalizing was performed on weld joint as online postweld heat treatment. The weld joint was heated to 930∼940°C by online high-frequency induction heating, then air cooled to 400°C, and subsequently water cooled to room temperature.Table 1
Chemical composition of the X70 pipeline steel.
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Cr
Al
Ti
Nb
0.07
0.24
1.55
0.011
0.002
0.15
0.028
0.014
0.051The weld seam and pipe body specimens were cut from the weld seam and prepared from 180° along the circumference of the pipe in accordance with the API specifications for fabricating pipelines as schematically shown in Figure1. Then, the plate fatigue specimens were machined. The size of the fatigue specimens is also shown in Figure 1. To assess the integrity of the X70 line pipe, two typical full-thickness plate fatigue specimens were used, that is, with or without surface finishing (the surface means as-rolled surface of the steel plate). This process was performed to reflect the actual fatigue life of the pipe and demonstrate the effect of the weld and PWHT, as well as the surface defects, on the fatigue life of the X70 HFW pipe.Figure 1
(a) Schematic illustration of the locations of cut and preparation of the test specimens. (b) The critical dimensions of the fatigue test specimens (all dimensions are in millimeter).
(a)
(b)The fatigue life tests were performed with an MTS servo-hydraulic universal testing machine. A stress ratio (R = σmin/σmax) of 0.1, a sinusoidal wave form, and a 10 Hz frequency were used for all tests. The maximum stress was applied as a controlled load at each of the seven stress levels. Each fatigue specimen was examined, until it fractured. The total fatigue cycles were calculated and served as the fatigue life measurement.The microstructures and fractography were analyzed with an optical microscope and an S-3400N scanning electron microscope to understand the fatigue crack initiation, propagation, and final rupture.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of the X70 HFW Pipe

The microstructure of the X70 pipeline steel is a typical acicular ferrite obtained by advanced thermal-mechanical control process (Figure2(a)). Thus, high strength and toughness were obtained (Table 2). The yield and tensile strengths of the pipe body (i.e., steel plate) were 525 MPa and 620 MPa, respectively, and the average Charpy impact energy was approximately 192 J. However, the acicular ferrite microstructure in the weld seam was disturbed by the HFW and PWHT. The microstructures of the weld junction and heat-affected zone (HAZ) changed to a mixture of ferrite and pearlite (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). The ferrite grain size gradually coarsened from the base metal to the weld junction (Figures 2(b)–2(d)), and the coarsest microstructure appeared at the weld junction (Figure 2(d)). The coarse microstructure resulted in reduced mechanical properties of weld seam (Table 2). The tensile strength of the weld seam approximately decreased by over 10 MPa than that of the pipe body, and the Charpy impact energy was reduced to 130 J. Nevertheless, the values of the mechanical properties for the X70 HFW pipe remained superior to the specified value of the API specifications for the X70 line pipe.Figure 2
Optical microstructure of the weld joint: (a) base metal, (b) heat-affected zone (HAZ) close to the base metal, (c) HAZ close to the weld junction, and (d) weld junction.Table 2
Mechanical properties of the X70 HFW pipes.
Yield strength (MPa)
Tensile strength (MPa)
Impact energy (J)
Tested value
Specification
Tested value
Specification
Tested value
Specification
Pipe body
525
481–621
620
565–758
209
120
Weld seam
—
605
565–758
130 (weld junction)172 (HAZ)
60


### 3.2. Stress-Number of Fatigue Cycle (S-N) Curves of the X70 HFW Pipe

The pipeline pipes, except the surface coating, do not require any other surface finishing, when they are applied in transmission pipelines. Hence, the fatigue test specimens without surface finishing could better reflect the fatigue properties of a pipeline. The stress (S)-number of fatigue cycle (N) curves obtained from the load control fatigue tests for the pipe body and weld joint without surface finishing were first determined (Figure 3). A considerable decrease (by over 50 MPa) in the resistance to S-N fatigue of the welded joint was observed than that of the pipe body. Kim et al. [23] suggested that the resistance to S-N fatigue was largely determined by the yield strength or arguably by the tensile strength of metals. However, the tensile strength of the welded joint was lower by approximately 10 MPa than that of the pipe body. This result indicates the presence of other factors that affect the resistance to S-N fatigue.Figure 3
Stress-number of fatigue cycle curves evaluated atR = 0.1, 10 Hz, and room temperature for the pipe body and the welded joint with and without surface finishing.Athanasios et al. [24] reported that fatigue cracks generally originated on the surface of the sample, and this phenomenon greatly affected the fatigue life. To estimate the effect of surface breaking irregularities, the S-N curves of the pipe body and weld joint with surface finishing were also measured (Figure 3). The results show that the surface finishing strongly improved the fatigue performance of the HFW pipe. The resistance to S-N fatigue of the welded joint and pipe body was higher than that of the specimens without surface finishing. The resistance to S-N fatigue of the welded joints was still lower than that of the pipe bodies, with an approximate reduction of 20 MPa. Nevertheless, the resistance to S-N fatigue of the welded joints was higher than that of the pipe bodies without surface finishing.


### 3.3. Macrofracture Analysis

The typical macrofractography of the specimens after fatigue fracture at same stress is shown in Figure4. In all cases, the fracture surface contained two clear cut sections, namely, the flat rupture section and ductile rupture section.Figure 4
Typical macrofractures of the pipe body (a) without surface finishing and (b) with surface finishing and those of the weld joint (c) without surface finishing and (d) with surface finishing.“The flat rupture section” corresponds to the typical of fatigue failure. Within this section, the accumulation of microstructure defects and mechanical property defects in materials may have been caused by cyclic loading [23–25]. Nucleation and propagation of microdefects occurred; that is, a fatigue microcrack was initiated at the accumulated defects. Then, microcracks propagated perpendicular to the cyclic loading and left crack-like tear on the surface of fatigue damage [26]. Nucleation of fatigue failure processes always begin from the surface [27]. Therefore, fatigue crack initiation is sensitive to the micro- and/or macrodefects of the microstructure and mechanical properties near the surface of specimens [26, 27]. Only one of the fatigue cracks was initiated on the fracture surface of the pipe body specimens with surface finishing (Figure 4(a)). By contrast, more than one fatigue crack was initiated on the surface of the pipe body specimens without surface finishing (Figure 4(b)) because more surface defects may have existed on the surface of the hot-rolled steel plate. The weld joint apparently followed similar rules. Only one of the fatigue cracks initiated at the weld seam was observed on the fracture surface of the weld joint with surface finishing (Figure 4(c)). However, for the weld joint without surface finishing, fatigue crack was apparently generated along the weld seam (Figure 5(d)). The appearance of the fatigue crack initiation may be related to the effect of deburring on the cross-sectional geometry and surface of the weld joint.Figure 5
Typical fractures at the crack initiation zone of (a–d) the pipe bodies and (e–h) weld joints (a, b, e, f) with and (c, d, g, h) without surface finishing.The ductile rupture section is considered a quasistatic fracture when the bearing capacity of specimens is less than the maximum cyclic loading because fatigue crack propagation reduces the loading area [26]. In this section, larger ductile deformation was observed, and the fracture was similar to static tensile. However, variations in the deformation of the specimens were noted between the pipe body and weld joint. The deformational manifestations at the macro level were mostly pronounced in the pipe body than in the weld joint. This phenomenon indicates that the weld joint ruptured at the weld seam because the weld seam may have low plasticity [28].


### 3.4. Microfracture Analysis

The macrofractography shows that the fatigue failure processes included fatigue crack initiation, propagation, and final rupture (Figure4). In these processes, the fatigue crack initiation and propagation are the most important processes that determine fatigue endurance [20]. Therefore, the microfractures caused by crack initiation and propagation were analyzed in detail by SEM (Figures 5 and 6).Figure 6
Typical fractures at the crack propagation zone of (a, b) the pipe bodies and (c, d) weld joints (a, c) with and (b, d) without surface finishing.


#### 3.4.1. Fatigue Crack Initial States

Figure5 shows the fractography of the initial crack side of all specimens. In the pipe body or weld joint specimens with surface finishing, the fatigue cracks were generated at a small dot scope on the surface and grew inward in radial directions, which were clearly displayed by the river pattern (Figures 5(a) and 5(c)). At the initial crack zone, fine transgranular tear facets were observed on the fracture surface of each specimen in the pipe body or weld joint with surface finishing. No notable difference was observed in the morphology of the fracture mode (Figures 5(b) and 5(d)). The change in failure mechanism from ductile tear manner was responsible for the increased fatigue resistance of pipe body to the weld joint [25].However, several differences were found between the pipe body and weld joint without surface finishing. For example, more than one fatigue crack nuclei were generated at a surface defect of the pipe body specimen without surface finishing and grew to a large fatigue crack (Figure5(e)). The microfractography showed the fine transgranular tear facets on the fracture surface (Figure 5(f)). This result is similar to the pipe body specimen with surface finishing (Figure 5(b)).In addition, the fatigue crack of specimens of weld joint was generated with a long line-like crack along the weld seam (Figures5(g) and 5(h)), and a linear defect was observed on the surface along weld seam (Figure 5(h)). Meanwhile, coarse transgranular cleavage facets compared with the other specimens were observed on the fracture surface (Figure 5(h)). The notable variations in the brittle fracture mechanism may be relative to the “burring” surface defects and coarsening microstructure of the weld seam.


#### 3.4.2. Fatigue Crack Propagation States

Figure6 shows the microfracture surface at the crack propagation section of the pipe body and weld joint specimens with and without surface finishing. The microfracture surfaces were uniform and contained transgranular cleavage facets and rough relief [26]. Simultaneously, fatigue striations were found on several transgranular cleavage facets and/or on the steps of the roughness reliefs. In addition, certain secondary cracks caused by microtear appeared were found on the surface. However, the facet size on the fracture surface of the pipe body was smaller than the pipe body, and several dot-like reliefs were observed in the facets and at the side of secondary cracks. The specific different rupture characteristics presented between the pipe body and the weld joint may be related to the variation in the microstructure at the fracture zone. The microstructure of the pipe body was refined acicular ferrite, whereas the microstructure of weld joint was coarsened polygonal ferrite (Figure 2).


### 3.5. Microstructure of the Fracture Section of the Weld Joints

The fractographic results show that the change in fracture manner between the pipe body and the weld joint may be related to the difference in microstructures (Figures5 and 6). Thus, the fatigue fracture of the weld joint should be the weld seam and HAZ. Figure 7 shows the microstructure near the fracture surface of weld joints with and without surface finishing, as well as the microstructure of the weld seam and HAZ. Figure 7(a) shows that the microstructure near the fracture of weld joint with surface finishing was coarsened polygonal ferrite and pearlite. By contrast, the microstructure near the fracture of weld joint without surface finishing was polygonal ferrite and pearlite with a banded microstructural characteristic (Figure 7(b)). Figure 2 shows that the zone with coarse microstructure of polygonal ferrite and pearlite corresponded to the weld junction, whereas the zone with banded polygonal ferrite and pearlite corresponded to the HAZ. The results were further confirmed by the scanning electron micrographs in Figures 7(c) and 7(d).Figure 7
Microstructures of the fracture section of the weld joint specimens (a) with and (b) without surface finishing, and the microstructures of (c) weld junction and (d) HAZ.


## 3.1. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of the X70 HFW Pipe

The microstructure of the X70 pipeline steel is a typical acicular ferrite obtained by advanced thermal-mechanical control process (Figure2(a)). Thus, high strength and toughness were obtained (Table 2). The yield and tensile strengths of the pipe body (i.e., steel plate) were 525 MPa and 620 MPa, respectively, and the average Charpy impact energy was approximately 192 J. However, the acicular ferrite microstructure in the weld seam was disturbed by the HFW and PWHT. The microstructures of the weld junction and heat-affected zone (HAZ) changed to a mixture of ferrite and pearlite (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). The ferrite grain size gradually coarsened from the base metal to the weld junction (Figures 2(b)–2(d)), and the coarsest microstructure appeared at the weld junction (Figure 2(d)). The coarse microstructure resulted in reduced mechanical properties of weld seam (Table 2). The tensile strength of the weld seam approximately decreased by over 10 MPa than that of the pipe body, and the Charpy impact energy was reduced to 130 J. Nevertheless, the values of the mechanical properties for the X70 HFW pipe remained superior to the specified value of the API specifications for the X70 line pipe.Figure 2
Optical microstructure of the weld joint: (a) base metal, (b) heat-affected zone (HAZ) close to the base metal, (c) HAZ close to the weld junction, and (d) weld junction.Table 2
Mechanical properties of the X70 HFW pipes.
Yield strength (MPa)
Tensile strength (MPa)
Impact energy (J)
Tested value
Specification
Tested value
Specification
Tested value
Specification
Pipe body
525
481–621
620
565–758
209
120
Weld seam
—
605
565–758
130 (weld junction)172 (HAZ)
60


## 3.2. Stress-Number of Fatigue Cycle (S-N) Curves of the X70 HFW Pipe

The pipeline pipes, except the surface coating, do not require any other surface finishing, when they are applied in transmission pipelines. Hence, the fatigue test specimens without surface finishing could better reflect the fatigue properties of a pipeline. The stress (S)-number of fatigue cycle (N) curves obtained from the load control fatigue tests for the pipe body and weld joint without surface finishing were first determined (Figure 3). A considerable decrease (by over 50 MPa) in the resistance to S-N fatigue of the welded joint was observed than that of the pipe body. Kim et al. [23] suggested that the resistance to S-N fatigue was largely determined by the yield strength or arguably by the tensile strength of metals. However, the tensile strength of the welded joint was lower by approximately 10 MPa than that of the pipe body. This result indicates the presence of other factors that affect the resistance to S-N fatigue.Figure 3
Stress-number of fatigue cycle curves evaluated atR = 0.1, 10 Hz, and room temperature for the pipe body and the welded joint with and without surface finishing.Athanasios et al. [24] reported that fatigue cracks generally originated on the surface of the sample, and this phenomenon greatly affected the fatigue life. To estimate the effect of surface breaking irregularities, the S-N curves of the pipe body and weld joint with surface finishing were also measured (Figure 3). The results show that the surface finishing strongly improved the fatigue performance of the HFW pipe. The resistance to S-N fatigue of the welded joint and pipe body was higher than that of the specimens without surface finishing. The resistance to S-N fatigue of the welded joints was still lower than that of the pipe bodies, with an approximate reduction of 20 MPa. Nevertheless, the resistance to S-N fatigue of the welded joints was higher than that of the pipe bodies without surface finishing.


## 3.3. Macrofracture Analysis

The typical macrofractography of the specimens after fatigue fracture at same stress is shown in Figure4. In all cases, the fracture surface contained two clear cut sections, namely, the flat rupture section and ductile rupture section.Figure 4
Typical macrofractures of the pipe body (a) without surface finishing and (b) with surface finishing and those of the weld joint (c) without surface finishing and (d) with surface finishing.“The flat rupture section” corresponds to the typical of fatigue failure. Within this section, the accumulation of microstructure defects and mechanical property defects in materials may have been caused by cyclic loading [23–25]. Nucleation and propagation of microdefects occurred; that is, a fatigue microcrack was initiated at the accumulated defects. Then, microcracks propagated perpendicular to the cyclic loading and left crack-like tear on the surface of fatigue damage [26]. Nucleation of fatigue failure processes always begin from the surface [27]. Therefore, fatigue crack initiation is sensitive to the micro- and/or macrodefects of the microstructure and mechanical properties near the surface of specimens [26, 27]. Only one of the fatigue cracks was initiated on the fracture surface of the pipe body specimens with surface finishing (Figure 4(a)). By contrast, more than one fatigue crack was initiated on the surface of the pipe body specimens without surface finishing (Figure 4(b)) because more surface defects may have existed on the surface of the hot-rolled steel plate. The weld joint apparently followed similar rules. Only one of the fatigue cracks initiated at the weld seam was observed on the fracture surface of the weld joint with surface finishing (Figure 4(c)). However, for the weld joint without surface finishing, fatigue crack was apparently generated along the weld seam (Figure 5(d)). The appearance of the fatigue crack initiation may be related to the effect of deburring on the cross-sectional geometry and surface of the weld joint.Figure 5
Typical fractures at the crack initiation zone of (a–d) the pipe bodies and (e–h) weld joints (a, b, e, f) with and (c, d, g, h) without surface finishing.The ductile rupture section is considered a quasistatic fracture when the bearing capacity of specimens is less than the maximum cyclic loading because fatigue crack propagation reduces the loading area [26]. In this section, larger ductile deformation was observed, and the fracture was similar to static tensile. However, variations in the deformation of the specimens were noted between the pipe body and weld joint. The deformational manifestations at the macro level were mostly pronounced in the pipe body than in the weld joint. This phenomenon indicates that the weld joint ruptured at the weld seam because the weld seam may have low plasticity [28].


## 3.4. Microfracture Analysis

The macrofractography shows that the fatigue failure processes included fatigue crack initiation, propagation, and final rupture (Figure4). In these processes, the fatigue crack initiation and propagation are the most important processes that determine fatigue endurance [20]. Therefore, the microfractures caused by crack initiation and propagation were analyzed in detail by SEM (Figures 5 and 6).Figure 6
Typical fractures at the crack propagation zone of (a, b) the pipe bodies and (c, d) weld joints (a, c) with and (b, d) without surface finishing.


### 3.4.1. Fatigue Crack Initial States

Figure5 shows the fractography of the initial crack side of all specimens. In the pipe body or weld joint specimens with surface finishing, the fatigue cracks were generated at a small dot scope on the surface and grew inward in radial directions, which were clearly displayed by the river pattern (Figures 5(a) and 5(c)). At the initial crack zone, fine transgranular tear facets were observed on the fracture surface of each specimen in the pipe body or weld joint with surface finishing. No notable difference was observed in the morphology of the fracture mode (Figures 5(b) and 5(d)). The change in failure mechanism from ductile tear manner was responsible for the increased fatigue resistance of pipe body to the weld joint [25].However, several differences were found between the pipe body and weld joint without surface finishing. For example, more than one fatigue crack nuclei were generated at a surface defect of the pipe body specimen without surface finishing and grew to a large fatigue crack (Figure5(e)). The microfractography showed the fine transgranular tear facets on the fracture surface (Figure 5(f)). This result is similar to the pipe body specimen with surface finishing (Figure 5(b)).In addition, the fatigue crack of specimens of weld joint was generated with a long line-like crack along the weld seam (Figures5(g) and 5(h)), and a linear defect was observed on the surface along weld seam (Figure 5(h)). Meanwhile, coarse transgranular cleavage facets compared with the other specimens were observed on the fracture surface (Figure 5(h)). The notable variations in the brittle fracture mechanism may be relative to the “burring” surface defects and coarsening microstructure of the weld seam.


### 3.4.2. Fatigue Crack Propagation States

Figure6 shows the microfracture surface at the crack propagation section of the pipe body and weld joint specimens with and without surface finishing. The microfracture surfaces were uniform and contained transgranular cleavage facets and rough relief [26]. Simultaneously, fatigue striations were found on several transgranular cleavage facets and/or on the steps of the roughness reliefs. In addition, certain secondary cracks caused by microtear appeared were found on the surface. However, the facet size on the fracture surface of the pipe body was smaller than the pipe body, and several dot-like reliefs were observed in the facets and at the side of secondary cracks. The specific different rupture characteristics presented between the pipe body and the weld joint may be related to the variation in the microstructure at the fracture zone. The microstructure of the pipe body was refined acicular ferrite, whereas the microstructure of weld joint was coarsened polygonal ferrite (Figure 2).


## 3.4.1. Fatigue Crack Initial States

Figure5 shows the fractography of the initial crack side of all specimens. In the pipe body or weld joint specimens with surface finishing, the fatigue cracks were generated at a small dot scope on the surface and grew inward in radial directions, which were clearly displayed by the river pattern (Figures 5(a) and 5(c)). At the initial crack zone, fine transgranular tear facets were observed on the fracture surface of each specimen in the pipe body or weld joint with surface finishing. No notable difference was observed in the morphology of the fracture mode (Figures 5(b) and 5(d)). The change in failure mechanism from ductile tear manner was responsible for the increased fatigue resistance of pipe body to the weld joint [25].However, several differences were found between the pipe body and weld joint without surface finishing. For example, more than one fatigue crack nuclei were generated at a surface defect of the pipe body specimen without surface finishing and grew to a large fatigue crack (Figure5(e)). The microfractography showed the fine transgranular tear facets on the fracture surface (Figure 5(f)). This result is similar to the pipe body specimen with surface finishing (Figure 5(b)).In addition, the fatigue crack of specimens of weld joint was generated with a long line-like crack along the weld seam (Figures5(g) and 5(h)), and a linear defect was observed on the surface along weld seam (Figure 5(h)). Meanwhile, coarse transgranular cleavage facets compared with the other specimens were observed on the fracture surface (Figure 5(h)). The notable variations in the brittle fracture mechanism may be relative to the “burring” surface defects and coarsening microstructure of the weld seam.


## 3.4.2. Fatigue Crack Propagation States

Figure6 shows the microfracture surface at the crack propagation section of the pipe body and weld joint specimens with and without surface finishing. The microfracture surfaces were uniform and contained transgranular cleavage facets and rough relief [26]. Simultaneously, fatigue striations were found on several transgranular cleavage facets and/or on the steps of the roughness reliefs. In addition, certain secondary cracks caused by microtear appeared were found on the surface. However, the facet size on the fracture surface of the pipe body was smaller than the pipe body, and several dot-like reliefs were observed in the facets and at the side of secondary cracks. The specific different rupture characteristics presented between the pipe body and the weld joint may be related to the variation in the microstructure at the fracture zone. The microstructure of the pipe body was refined acicular ferrite, whereas the microstructure of weld joint was coarsened polygonal ferrite (Figure 2).


## 3.5. Microstructure of the Fracture Section of the Weld Joints

The fractographic results show that the change in fracture manner between the pipe body and the weld joint may be related to the difference in microstructures (Figures5 and 6). Thus, the fatigue fracture of the weld joint should be the weld seam and HAZ. Figure 7 shows the microstructure near the fracture surface of weld joints with and without surface finishing, as well as the microstructure of the weld seam and HAZ. Figure 7(a) shows that the microstructure near the fracture of weld joint with surface finishing was coarsened polygonal ferrite and pearlite. By contrast, the microstructure near the fracture of weld joint without surface finishing was polygonal ferrite and pearlite with a banded microstructural characteristic (Figure 7(b)). Figure 2 shows that the zone with coarse microstructure of polygonal ferrite and pearlite corresponded to the weld junction, whereas the zone with banded polygonal ferrite and pearlite corresponded to the HAZ. The results were further confirmed by the scanning electron micrographs in Figures 7(c) and 7(d).Figure 7
Microstructures of the fracture section of the weld joint specimens (a) with and (b) without surface finishing, and the microstructures of (c) weld junction and (d) HAZ.


## 4. Discussion

The X70 HFW pipe had high strength, impact toughness (Table2), and fatigue resistance (Figure 3). Lower mechanical properties appeared in the weld joint. The tensile strength of the weld joint decreased by approximately 15 MPa than that of the pipe body, and the impact energy was reduced from 209 J for the pipe body to 130 J for the weld seam. Meanwhile, fatigue resistance also decreased. The microstructural results showed that the coarsened polygonal ferrite and pearlite were obtained in the weld seam, whereas no obvious oxide and other inclusions were observed (Figure 2). The fatigue fractography shows that the fatigue crack was initiated at a line defect on the surface of weld joint without surface finishing, which resulted in reduced fatigue resistance (Figure 4). However, the fatigue crack initiation side in the HAZ was confirmed by the microstructural observation of fracture cross section (Figure 7). All results suggest that the weld seam as the weakest location for the X70 HFW pipe was not caused by oxide and other inclusions, which were assumed to be the primary reason for reduced mechanical properties of the weld seam [6]. The law of cause and effect should be considered in searching for a cause to improve the mechanical properties of HFW pipes.The key processes that affect the microstructure and mechanical properties of a weld seam mainly included pipe forming, welding, deburring, and online PWHT. The key processes are illustrated in Figure8. During welding, the dual edge of the steel plate from the upstream side of the welding spot was first heated by joule heat. Then, the melting metal was generated at the approximate welding abutting point of the dual edge of the plate. Finally, the melted metal was pressed together by squeezing (Figure 8(a)), whereby a metallurgical bond formed with the extruded melt metal including oxide inclusions, and the formed weld seam is illustrated in Figure 8(b). Many investigations and betriebspraxis studies [1, 2, 10, 11] have demonstrated that high weld quality could be guaranteed by optimizing the welding process parameters, such as the electrical power input, welding speed, plate thickness, apex angle, and squeezing force. Therefore, high weld quality of the X70 pipe was obtained. For example, no oxide inclusions were observed in the microstructure. Meanwhile, the mechanical properties at the weld joint decreased, and the key factors that affect the weld quality were discussed.Figure 8
Schematic illustrates (a) the welding processes and (b) the structure of weld joint.
(a)
(b)Fatigue, as the most important parameter for integrity evaluation, can better evaluate the weld quality of HFW pipes because fatigue crack initiation and propagation are more sensitive to the structure and properties of metals [25]. Oxides and other inclusions at the weld junction could facilitate fatigue crack initiation and propagation and decrease fatigue resistance. Figure 3 shows that the fatigue resistance of the weld joint with surface finishing was lower than that of the pipe body, while the reduction was only observed near the tensile strength. Jung et al. [26] suggested that fatigue resistance was largely determined by the yield strength or arguably by the tensile strength. Meanwhile, no oxide inclusions were observed in the microstructure (Figure 2) and fracture surface (Figure 4). Thus, X70 HFW pipe exhibited improved weld quality.However, the weld junction and its HAZ formed by joule heating and squeezing were disturbed and deteriorated because of the high temperature. Thus, PWHT processes play an important role in improving the microstructure and mechanical properties of the weld junction and its HAZ [29]. In this study, online normalization was performed as PWHT processes for the X70 pipe. The PWHT process parameters were as follows: heating temperature, 950°C; and cooling rate from 950°C to 500°C, 3–5°Cs−1. At the lower cooling rate, the weld seam displayed mixed microstructure of coarsened polygonal ferrite and pearlite (Figure 2). This characteristic caused the lower strength and toughness of weld joint than those of the pipe body with fine acicular ferrite. We showed in our previous study [30] that the heat treatment process parameters, such as the austenitizing temperature and cooling rate, especially the latter, greatly affect the microstructure and mechanical properties. From this point, increasing the cooling rate would help improve the microstructure and mechanical properties of the weld seam. This process needs further investigation.In addition, the pipe body or weld joint with surface finishing showed higher resistance toS-N fatigue than those without surface finishing. Meanwhile, the decreasing degrees of the resistance to S-N fatigue for the weld joint were higher than those of the pipe body (Figure 3). Fatigue is always generated on the surface [23–26, 31, 32], which implies that fatigue crack initiation is more sensitive to the surface defects [32]. Thus, fatigue cracks of all specimens were generated on the surface, and more nuclei of fatigue cracks appeared on the surface of the pipe body specimens without surface finishing (Figure 4). Moreover, several small oxidized pit defects on the as-rolled plate surface facilitated the fatigue crack initiation (Figure 5), which resulted in a small reduction in the resistance to S-N fatigue for pipe body without surface finishing (Figure 3). Conversely, a bigger reduction in the resistance to S-N fatigue occurred in the weld joint specimens without surface finishing (Figure 3). Meanwhile, the fatigue crack nucleus became line-like along the weld seam (Figures 4 and 5). Figure 8(b) shows that a raised upset of melted metal formed at the weld seam by squeezing. This formation was named “burr,” and the burr should be removed online by deburring machines. In this case, line-like defects possibly formed along the side of the burr. The orientation for the long surface defect has a great effect on the fatigue crack initiation and propagation [33, 34]. Given that the long surface defect is perpendicular to the principal stress direction, the fatigue cracks will be easily generated at the sharp corners of the long surface defect and quickly propagated in the depth direction [34]. The results of the microstructural observation of the fracture section verified that the fatigue crack of the weld joint specimens without surface finishing was generated at the HAZ (Figure 6). This result was consistent with the burring in Figure 7. Hence, the trails and defects caused by deburring in HAZ were the main reasons for the reduced resistance to S-N fatigue of the weld joint without surface finishing. Nevertheless, compared with our previous work on the X80 submerged-arc welded pipe [22], the decreasing degrees of resistance to S-N fatigue between the weld joint and pipe body were comparable, which were approximately 80 MPa for the X70 HFW pipe and 100 MPa for the X80 submerged-arc welded pipe [22]. The results indicate that the HFW pipes and submerged-arc welded pipe had similar weld qualities.Hence, the X70 HFW pipe exhibited good mechanical properties. All mechanical properties were superior to the specified API specifications for the X70 line pipe. Although a weakened zone appeared at the weld joint, the resistance toS-N fatigue of the pipe body and weld joint specimens with surface finishing showed that the weld joint had high weld quality. The reduced strength, toughness, and fatigue resistance of the weld joint could be ascribed to the microstructural coarsening at the weld junction zone. This phenomenon was more mainly related to the PWHT processes. Moreover, the resistance to S-N fatigue of the weld joint specimens without surface finishing was further reduced than the specimens with surface finishing. The reduced resistances were mainly attributed to deburring defects and microstructure coarsening in HAZ. Therefore, future key works to improve the X70 HFW pipe quality should focus on refining the microstructure and improving the surface quality of the weld junction and HAZ.


## 5. Conclusions

In this work, the mechanical properties of the X70 HFW pipe were comprehensively assessed. The following conclusions were drawn:(1)
High weld quality can be achieved in the HFW pipe. Although a weakened zone appeared at the weld joint of the X70 HFW pipe, all mechanical properties were superior to the API specifications for the X70 line pipe.(2)
The resistance toS-N fatigue of the weld joint specimens with surface finishing decreased by approximately 20 MPa compared with that of the pipe body. This result is similar to the decrease in the tensile strength between the pipe body and the weld joint. The resistance to S-N fatigue was largely determined by the tensile strength of the materials.(3)
The reductions in the strength, toughness, and fatigue resistance of the weld joint were mainly related to the microstructural coarsening at the weld junction zone. These coarsened microstructures could be improved by optimizing the parameters of PWHT in the future.(4)
The surface defects, particularly the burring defects, could become the fatigue crack-initiated nuclei and accelerate fatigue crack initiation and propagation. Furthermore, the X70 HFW pipe showed decreased resistance toS-N fatigue. Optimizing the PWHT and removing the burr processes are key factors to improve the X70 HFW pipe quality in future studies.



---

*Source: 2358038-2018-07-24.xml*