# Measurement of Terahertz Optical-Beat Frequency Using High-Order Harmonics of Microwave in a Photoconductive Device

Authors: Kengo Murasawa; Koki Sato; Takehiko Hidaka
Journal: Advances in Optical Technologies
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

A method for measuring frequencies of the terahertz (THz) radiation emitted by the antenna mounted on the photoconductive (PC) device is presented. Two laser beams with slightly different frequencies irradiate the PC device, producing a beat current of 1 THz in the photocurrent. A microwave signal is applied to the antenna electrode. The frequency of the THz wave is measured using the homodyne detection of the optical beat with the high-order harmonics of the microwave. It is being investigated that the high-order harmonics are produced by the PC device owing to its nonlinearity. Periodic peaks generated by the homodyne detection were observed in the photocurrent, as the microwave was swept from 16 to 20 GHz with a power of −40 dBm. Using the peak frequencies, the THz-wave frequency was determined to be1030.3±3.73 GHz. The measurement error is estimated to be less than 0.43 GHz. The proposed method realizes a compact frequency meter in the THz region.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

A method for measuring frequencies of continuous wave (cw) terahertz (THz) radiation is one of key technologies for various applications of THz waves, for example, THz spectroscopy, radioastronomy, and future communication systems. Frequencies of the THz wave are usually measured using a Fourier-transformed interferometer which is applicable to both the cw and pulsed THz radiation. Various types of interferometers in the THz region are used, for example, a Martin-Puplett interferometer [1] and scanning Fabry-Perot etalon [2]. Frequency resolution of the interferometer is limited by the scanning range of the path difference of the THz wave. Longer scanning range is necessary to obtain higher frequency resolution. For example, the scanning range of 1 meter is necessary to obtain the frequency resolution of 0.15 GHz. Such an interferometer is generally large compared with the THz generation/detection system itself and is not suitable for practical use.The cw THz wave can be generated by a photomixing technique [3]. When two cw laser beams with slightly different optical frequencies (f1,f2) irradiate the antenna gap fabricated on the photoconductive (PC) device, an optical-beat current at a difference frequency fT (=f1-f2) is produced between the electrodes (i.e., the antenna). The THz wave with the same frequency fT is emitted from the antenna by dipole radiation. One method to know the frequency of the THz wave is by utilizing the locked difference frequency of the two laser beams of the light sources [4, 5]. However, the setup required to lock the difference frequency of the two laser beams is apt to increase system complexity and system scale. Recently, a frequency of the pulsed THz wave was measured using a THz-frequency comb induced by irradiating the PC device with the femtosecond laser pulses [6, 7]. This method suggests that the homodyne or heterodyne detection techniques are useful for measuring the frequency of the THz wave.In order to detect the cw THz-wave by the homodyne detection [8], two laser beams of the light sources are divided into two branches. One of the two branches irradiates the emitting PC device and emits the THz wave. The other branch irradiates the receiving PC device and causes the optical-beat current which simultaneously modulates the photoconductance of the PC device. In the receiving PC device, two signals with THz frequencies are multiplied. One of the two THz signals is the modulated photoconductance caused by the optical-beat current. The other is antenna voltage induced by the electric field of the received THz wave. Since the frequency of the modulated photoconductance is the same as that of the induced antenna voltage, the direct-current (dc) component is generated in the photocurrent by the homodyne detection.If a voltage signal with a THz frequencyfT′ is, instead of the antenna voltage induced by the received THz wave, externally applied to the antenna of the receiving PC device, it is expected that the heterodyne signal (generally fT′≠fT) is generated by the similar principle mentioned above. When fT′=fT, it is particularly expected that the dc component of the photocurrent is generated by the homodyne detection and can be detected by a lock-in amplifier. The voltage signal with the THz frequency can be generated by microwave harmonics using a suitable microwave diode. If such a diode generates high-order harmonics of the microwave with frequencies up to the THz region, a homodyne signal of the optical beat with the high-order harmonics of the microwave is expected.In this paper, we report two subjects. First, the homodyne detection of the optical beat with the high-order harmonics of the microwave is described in Sections2 and 3.1. In the experiments, it was found that the high-order harmonics of the microwave were generated by the PC device. Hence, the harmonic generation in the PC device is described in Section 3.2. Next, the method for measuring the frequency of the optical beat is described in Section 3.3. Procedures and results of the frequency measurement of the optical beat at about 1 THz are explained and discussed.


## 2. Experimental Setup

Figure1 shows the experimental setup to measure the optical-beat frequency in the PC device. A dual-wavelength distributed Bragg-reflecting laser diode (DW-DBR-LD) [9] was used as a light source. The DW-DBR-LD operates in cw and simultaneous dual-wavelength mode with a wavelength separation of approximately 2.48 nm (≈1 THz) centered at 850 nm. The DW-DBR-LD can also oscillate in a single-wavelength mode by adjusting its injection current. The single-wavelength mode was used to compare the photocurrent response in the dual-wavelength mode with that in the single-wavelength mode. The output beam was routed to an optical isolator to avoid instability of the laser oscillation owing to backward reflection. The oscillation spectrum was monitored by an optical spectrometer (Hamamatsu Photonics PMA-50, the wavelength resolution of 0.055 nm (24 GHz in frequency) at 850 nm). The main beam passed through an attenuator (ATT) with which the incident laser power was controlled and was focused by an objective lens (L) onto the PC device. The PC material was a low-temperature-grown GaAs (LTG-GaAs) film grown on a semi-insulating GaAs substrate [3] as shown in Figure 2. The dipole-antenna structure with a gap of approximately 5 μm was located at the center of a 10-mm long coplanar transmission line with a separation of approximately 30-μm. This antenna structure was fabricated on the LTG-GaAs film.Figure 1
Experimental setup to measure the optical-beat frequency. By modulating the amplitude of the microwave signal at 1 kHz, the resultant photocurrent variations were detected by a lock-in amplifier.Figure 2
Structure of the PC device.The PC device was biased to a voltageVs via a resistor Rs (1 MΩ). The THz wave was emitted into free space. The microwave signal was supplied by a signal generator (SG) (Agilent 83624B, frequency range: 2–20 GHz) and applied to one of two antenna electrodes via a diode and capacitor (C). The other electrode was grounded. The diode was a step recovery diode (Herotek GC2050A, SMA type, efficiency of the harmonic generation ≈−20 dB/octave). The diode was connected to an SMA-type connector assembled on the metal mount of the PC device. The capacitor C was a tip-type monolithic ceramic capacitor (Murata, capacitance of 10 pF). By modulating the amplitude of the microwave signal at 1 kHz, the resultant photocurrent variations were converted to the voltage variations by the resistor Rs and detected by a lock-in amplifier (time constant: 1 s).Prior to the measurement of the optical-beat frequency, the THz-wave generation was confirmed by the homodyne-detection technique using the setup shown in Figure3. The THz wave emitted by the PC device was reflected by an aluminum-block concave mirror (M) and focused onto the same PC device. That is, the PC device operates as a transceiver for the THz wave. The THz wave was chopped by a mechanical chopper (13 Hz). The resultant on-off homodyne current was converted to the on-off voltage by Rs and measured by a lock-in amplifier.Figure 3
Experimental setup of a THz-wave generator and homodyne receiver using a single PC device (THz transceiver). The emitted THz wave was reflected by a mirror (M) and focused onto the same PC device.The amplitude of the photocurrent variations was obtained while moving the mirror M along the emitting axis of the THz wave was measured. The maximum homodyne current of 1 nA was obtained. The frequency of the THz wave was obtained by Fourier-transforming the data in which the mirror displacement was converted to the path difference of the THz wave in free space by multiplying by2/c, where c is the speed of light. The frequency of 1028 GHz was obtained in the Fourier-transformed spectrum under the conditions of the incident laser power P0=4 mW and Vs=20 V. The frequency error was estimated to be ±5 GHz, because the spectral width of the THz wave was narrower than the frequency resolution of 10 GHz derived from the mirror displacement of 14 mm. Therefore, the frequency of the optical beat is determined to be 1028 ± 5 GHz, which is referred as the coarse frequency of the optical beat in Section 3.3.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Homodyne Detection of Optical Beat with Microwave Harmonics

The microwave signal was applied to the PC device via the diode as shown in Figure1 and swept from 16 to 20 GHz (sweep rate: 1 MHz/s) with a power of Pmw=-40 dBm. Figure 4 shows the dependence of the photocurrent on the microwave frequency plotted every 1 MHz in the microwave frequency. Figure 4(a) shows the photocurrent variation in the case of dual-wavelength irradiation of the laser light (i.e., optical beating at about 1 THz). Clear periodic peaks in the photocurrent were observed as the microwave frequency was swept. These periodic peaks were observed only in the microwave power range of Pmw=-43 to −37 dBm (power variation: ±3 dB). Figure 4(b) shows the photocurrent variation in the case of single-wavelength irradiation of the laser light (i.e., no optical beating). No periodic peak was observed. Therefore, the periodic peaks shown in Figure 4(a) are definitely caused by the optical beat. Figure 4(c) show the photocurrent variation in the case of no-irradiating while biasing the PC device. Figure 4(d) shows the photocurrent variation in the case of no-irradiating and no-biasing the PC device. No periodic peak was observed for both the cases. Therefore, it is obvious that the periodic responses shown in Figure 4(a) are not parasitic resonances of the electric circuits. Because the peaks shown in Figure 4(a) periodically occur as the microwave frequency is swept, these peaks are most likely generated by the homodyne detection of the optical beat with the high-order harmonic of the microwave when the frequency of the high-order harmonic of the microwave is tuned to that of the optical beat. Since the oscillation frequencies of the DW-DBR-LD are not stabilized, a difference between the two oscillation frequencies randomly fluctuates around an average of the difference frequencies. When the swept frequency of the high-order harmonic of the microwave coincides with the instantaneous frequency of the optical beat, the peak of the photocurrent is generated by the homodyne detection. Accordingly, the peak width in Figure 4(a) exhibits the frequency fluctuation of the optical beat caused by the fluctuation of the difference frequencies of the incident laser light.Dependence of the photocurrent on the microwave frequency for (a) dual-wavelength irradiation (optical beating at 1 THz), (b) single-wavelength irradiation (no optical beating), (c) no-irradiating while biasing the PC device, and (d) no-irradiating and no-biasing the PC device.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


### 3.2. Characteristics of Harmonic Generation in the PC Device

If the periodic peaks in Figure4(a) are generated by the homodyne detection, the high-order harmonics with the THz frequencies must be generated by the diode and reach the antenna. However, since a length between the diode and antenna in our setup was approximately 20 mm, the harmonics with frequencies higher than 100 GHz are difficult to reach the antenna. Hence, it is expected that nonlinearities are caused in the PC device. In order to confirm whether the nonlinearity exists in the PC device or not, we measured the efficiency of the high-order harmonic generation (η) using the setup shown in Figure 5. An electrically tunable dual-wavelength laser diode (TDW-LD) [10] was used as a light source. The wavelength separation of the TDW-LD can be electrically tuned to 0–4.4 nm (approximately 0–2.2 THz) at the center wavelength of 780 nm. Here, the wavelength separation of 0 nm means for the TDW-LD to oscillate in the single-wavelength mode. The wavelength separation of the TDW-LD was set to 2, 4, or 0 nm to generate the optical-beat frequencies at 1 THz, 2 THz, and no optical beating in the PC device, respectively. A low-frequency signal (600 Hz) was applied to the PC device. The harmonics of the signal (600 Hz) created in the photocurrent were measured by a fast Fourier transformer (FFT).Figure 5
Experimental setup to measure the efficiency of the high-order harmonic generation in the PC device. The signal (600 Hz) was applied to the PC device, and the harmonics in the photocurrent were measured by a fast Fourier transformer (FFT).Figure6 shows η (the ratio of each harmonic current to that of the fundamental wave) in the case of the optical-beat frequency of 1, 2 THz, and single-wavelength irradiation of the laser light. The harmonic components due to the waveform distortion of the signal source itself are also shown (the triangles), which represents the lower sensitivity limit in our measuring system. The maximum order (n=35) represents upper frequency limit in our measuring system. In the case of the optical beat of 1 THz (the blue-colored circles), many harmonics were observed. The second-order harmonic rapidly decreases, and the harmonics over the third-order gradually decrease as the order of harmonics increases. In the case of the optical beat of 2 THz (the yellow-colored circles), η is slightly lower than that for the optical-beat frequency of 1 THz. Therefore, η tends to decrease as the optical-beat frequency increases. In the case of single-wavelength irradiation (i.e., no optical beating) of the laser light, the plots (the squares) almost overlap with those of the signal source (the triangles). Therefore, it is known that the harmonics in the case of the single-wavelength irradiation are below the lower sensitivity limit of the measuring system, or the harmonics are scarcely generated. These experimental results suggest that the current waveform of the signal (600 Hz) is distorted by the modulated photoconductance with the THz frequency, generating the high-order harmonics in the photocurrent. Detailed mechanism on the harmonic generation in the PC device is being investigated.Figure 6
Efficiency of the high-order harmonic generation (η) in the PC device (fundamental frequency: 600 Hz). The source represents the lower sensitivity limit in the measuring system. η in the cases of dual-wavelength irradiation (optical-beat frequency of 1 and 2 THz) is larger than that in the case of single-wavelength irradiation (no optical beating).The solid line represents the fitted line to the plots for the optical beat of 1 and 2 THz.η in dB is expressed as(1)η={-80dB(n=2),-3.8dB/octave(n≥3),
where the plots for n≥32 are not included in the fitting calculation because of low sensitivity at the band edge of the FFT. According to studies on the generation and homodyne detection of the cw THz wave by the pioneers [3, 8], the PC device has an almost flat response up to 600 GHz and a role-off response for over 600 GHz. The cutoff frequency (600 GHz) depends on the time constant of the PC device tested. Therefore, when the low order harmonics of the microwave generated by the diode are, instead of the signal (600 Hz) mentioned above, applied to the PC device, the high-order harmonics with the sub-THz to THz region are generated in the PC device.


### 3.3. Measurement of the Optical-Beat Frequency

Using the periodic photocurrent peaks obtained when the microwave frequency was swept, the optical-beat frequency in the THz region was measured. The blue-colored peaks shown in Figure7 are, the same plots as shown in Figure 4(a), the measured photocurrent variation for the optical-beat frequency of 1 THz under the conditions of P0=4 mW, Pmw=-40 dBm, and Vs=20 V. Figure 8 shows a schematic diagram of a double-stage harmonic generator consists of the diode and PC device. The mth order harmonic is generated by the diode and fed to the PC device, and then the nth order harmonic is generated by the PC device from the mth order harmonic fed from the diode. That is, the mth order harmonic acts as the source of the nth order harmonic in the PC device. The harmonic frequency f3(i) defined by the orders m and n is expressed as (2)f3(i)=mnfc(i)(i=1,2,…),
where i is the identification number of the photocurrent peaks shown in Figure 7 and fc(i) is a central frequency of the microwave for the ith peak. fc(i) is determined by fitting a following Gaussian function:
(3)y(i)=ai+biexp⁡[-(fmw-fc(i)2Δf(i))2](i=1,2,…),
to the ith peak, where fmw is the swept frequency of the microwave, ai and bi are constants for each peak, andΔf(i) is the peak width in which the photocurrent decreases to 1/e relative to that at the Gaussian top. The fitted curves are shown by the solid lines in Figure 7. Numerical examples of fc(i) and corresponding m and n for the seven peaks (i=1to7) are listed in Table 1.Table 1
Numerical examples of the central frequencyfc(i) and its harmonic frequency f3(i) for the seven peaks in Figure 7 (optical-beat frequency: 1 THz). i is the identification number of the peak. m and n are the candidate orders of the harmonics for the diode and PC device, respectively. mn is a total order of the harmonics. The asterisks are the determined combinations of m and n for each peak (see the text).
ifc(i) (GHz)mnmnf3(i) (GHz)116.10312164641030.600*232641030.600416641030.600216.34376163631029.657*321631029.657316.61971162621030.422*231621030.422416.88374161611029.908*517.16645160601029.987*230601029.987320601029.987415601029.987512601029.987617.47100159591030.789*717.75825158581029.979*229581029.979Figure 7
Determination of the central frequencyfc(i) of the ith peak for optical beating at 1 THz. The blue-colored plots (same as Figure 4(a)) represent the measured periodic peaks. The solid lines are the fitted curves defined by (3) for each peak. fc(i) is determined as the frequency at each Gaussian top. Δf(i) is the peak width for the ith peak. Numerical examples for the seven peaks (i=1-7) are listed in Table 1.Figure 8
Double-stage harmonic generator consisting of the diode and PC device.The ordersm and n are determined as follows. Since a maximum frequency of the signal fed to the PC device is considered to be restricted to 100 GHz as described in Section 3.2, the order m must satisfy
(4)mfc(i)≤100GHz.
In addition, using the frequency of 1028±5 GHz measured by the homodyne detection described in Section 2 as the coarse frequency, the order n must satisfy(5)|f3(i)-1028|<5GHz.
For the peak i=1 in Table 1, three candidates of (m=1, n=64), (2, 32), and (4, 16) satisfy (4) and (5). For the peak i=2, two candidates of (1, 63) and (3, 21) satisfy (4) and (5). Whereas for the peak i=4 and i=6, only one candidate (m=1) satisfies (4) and (5). As explained in Section 3.1, the periodic peaks were observed within the microwave power variation of about ±3 dB around the optimum microwave power of −40 dBm. That is, the periodic peaks are not generated when the microwave power is stronger or weaker than the optimum microwave power by over 3 dB. While reasons for the dependence on the microwave power are not clarified at present, we utilize only its property to determine the harmonic order of the microwave. Since the efficiency of the harmonic generation of the diode is −20 dB/octave, the power of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th harmonic generated by the diode is lower than that of the fundamental (m=1) by 20, 31.6, 40, and 46.4 dB, respectively. Accordingly, the power differences among the harmonics for m=1-5 are much larger than 3 dB. Hence, the order m for all peaks must be common. Consequently, m=1 is determined to be the common order for all peaks. The resultant n and f3(i) for m=1 are indicated by the asterisks in Table 1. It is seen in Table 1 that the high-order harmonics with the frequencies up to the THz region are generated by the PC device from the fundamental (m=1) of the microwave. The total orders mn for each peak are shown in Figure 7. It can be understood that the periodic peak is generated when the harmonic with the 64th to 52th order is sequentially tuned to the optical beat as the microwave frequency is swept from 16 to 20 GHz. In addition, the high-order harmonics (the source of them is the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th order harmonic produced by the diode) are generated by the PC device. However, they does not contribute to the periodic peak generation, because the power levels for m=2-5 relative to that for m=1 are much lower than 3 dB.Distribution of the resultant frequencyf3(i) is shown by the plots in Figure 9(a). The peak width mnΔf(i)obtained by (3) is shown by the length of the upper and lower error bar and is also plotted in Figure 9(b). The optical-beat frequency fT is defined as an average of f3(i) and given by(6)fT=1M∑i=1Mf3(i),
where M is the repeat times of the measurement. According to the ANSI/ASME performance test codes PTC19.1 [11], the total error δT consists of the bias error δB and random error δR and is given by
(7)δT=δB+δR.
The bias error is constant and roughly estimated to be δB≈0.1 GHz (the frequency instability of the high-order harmonics of the microwave: 200 kHz at 1 THz, and the data processing error: 50 MHz). The random error in our experiment is expressed as
(8)δR=σ1+σ2,
where σ1 is the long-term frequency instability of the light source including the microwave generator, which is obtained as the standard deviation of the fluctuation of f3(i) shown in Figure 9(a) and given by
(9)σ1=∑i=1M(f3(i)-fT)2M-1,σ2 is the short-term frequency instability of the light source, and is obtained as the standard deviation for the ith peak (namely, the peak width mnΔf(i)). σ2 is improved by M-times repetition measurements and given by(10)σ2=∑i=1M(mnΔf(i))2M.Distribution of (a) the determined harmonic frequencyf3(i) (plots) and its peak width mnΔf(i) (error bars) for the high-order harmonics, and (b) the peak width mnΔf(i). The optical beat frequencyfT is defined as an average of f3(i). σ1 and σ2  are the standard deviations of f3(i) andmnΔf(i), respectively. The random error is given by σ1+σ2 (see the text).
(a)(b)Substituting the measured frequenciesf3(i) in Figure 9(a) to (6), the optical-beat frequency is determined to be fT=1030.3 GHz, where M=13, because the frequency measurements are repeated by 13 times during sweeping the microwave frequency from 16 to 20 GHz. By substituting fT into (9), the long-term frequency instability is obtained to be σ1=0.33 GHz. Substituting mnΔf(i) in Figure 9(b) into (10), the short-term frequency instability is obtained to be σ2=3.3 GHz. Using σ1 and σ2, δR=3.63 GHz by (8). Finally, the total error results in δT=3.73 GHz by (7).SinceδT≈σ2, the total error is dominated by the frequency fluctuations of the light source (DW-DBR-LD). If the frequencies of the light source are completely stabilized (i.e., σ2=0), the total error becomes δT=δB+σ1=0.43 GHz. Since σ1 includes the long-term frequency instabilities of the light source and can be reduced by improvements of the light source, the total-error limit (i.e., the measurement error) of the proposed method is estimated to be less than 0.43 GHz. δT is reduced to about 1/12 and 1/28 compared with the frequency error of the transceiver-type homodyne detection (±5 GHz) and the optical spectrometer (±12 GHz), respectively. The total error of 0.43 GHz is the same error as the Fourier-transformed interferometer with a scanning range of 0.35 m.The proposed method readily presents a compact frequency meter for the cw THz-wave generator with a photomixer. In addition, if the oscillation frequencies of the two laser beams are controlled so as to reduce the peak width of the photocurrent response, the frequency of the emitted THz wave can be stabilized, which will realize a high-precision signal generator in the THz region and a high-resolution THz spectrometer.


## 3.1. Homodyne Detection of Optical Beat with Microwave Harmonics

The microwave signal was applied to the PC device via the diode as shown in Figure1 and swept from 16 to 20 GHz (sweep rate: 1 MHz/s) with a power of Pmw=-40 dBm. Figure 4 shows the dependence of the photocurrent on the microwave frequency plotted every 1 MHz in the microwave frequency. Figure 4(a) shows the photocurrent variation in the case of dual-wavelength irradiation of the laser light (i.e., optical beating at about 1 THz). Clear periodic peaks in the photocurrent were observed as the microwave frequency was swept. These periodic peaks were observed only in the microwave power range of Pmw=-43 to −37 dBm (power variation: ±3 dB). Figure 4(b) shows the photocurrent variation in the case of single-wavelength irradiation of the laser light (i.e., no optical beating). No periodic peak was observed. Therefore, the periodic peaks shown in Figure 4(a) are definitely caused by the optical beat. Figure 4(c) show the photocurrent variation in the case of no-irradiating while biasing the PC device. Figure 4(d) shows the photocurrent variation in the case of no-irradiating and no-biasing the PC device. No periodic peak was observed for both the cases. Therefore, it is obvious that the periodic responses shown in Figure 4(a) are not parasitic resonances of the electric circuits. Because the peaks shown in Figure 4(a) periodically occur as the microwave frequency is swept, these peaks are most likely generated by the homodyne detection of the optical beat with the high-order harmonic of the microwave when the frequency of the high-order harmonic of the microwave is tuned to that of the optical beat. Since the oscillation frequencies of the DW-DBR-LD are not stabilized, a difference between the two oscillation frequencies randomly fluctuates around an average of the difference frequencies. When the swept frequency of the high-order harmonic of the microwave coincides with the instantaneous frequency of the optical beat, the peak of the photocurrent is generated by the homodyne detection. Accordingly, the peak width in Figure 4(a) exhibits the frequency fluctuation of the optical beat caused by the fluctuation of the difference frequencies of the incident laser light.Dependence of the photocurrent on the microwave frequency for (a) dual-wavelength irradiation (optical beating at 1 THz), (b) single-wavelength irradiation (no optical beating), (c) no-irradiating while biasing the PC device, and (d) no-irradiating and no-biasing the PC device.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.2. Characteristics of Harmonic Generation in the PC Device

If the periodic peaks in Figure4(a) are generated by the homodyne detection, the high-order harmonics with the THz frequencies must be generated by the diode and reach the antenna. However, since a length between the diode and antenna in our setup was approximately 20 mm, the harmonics with frequencies higher than 100 GHz are difficult to reach the antenna. Hence, it is expected that nonlinearities are caused in the PC device. In order to confirm whether the nonlinearity exists in the PC device or not, we measured the efficiency of the high-order harmonic generation (η) using the setup shown in Figure 5. An electrically tunable dual-wavelength laser diode (TDW-LD) [10] was used as a light source. The wavelength separation of the TDW-LD can be electrically tuned to 0–4.4 nm (approximately 0–2.2 THz) at the center wavelength of 780 nm. Here, the wavelength separation of 0 nm means for the TDW-LD to oscillate in the single-wavelength mode. The wavelength separation of the TDW-LD was set to 2, 4, or 0 nm to generate the optical-beat frequencies at 1 THz, 2 THz, and no optical beating in the PC device, respectively. A low-frequency signal (600 Hz) was applied to the PC device. The harmonics of the signal (600 Hz) created in the photocurrent were measured by a fast Fourier transformer (FFT).Figure 5
Experimental setup to measure the efficiency of the high-order harmonic generation in the PC device. The signal (600 Hz) was applied to the PC device, and the harmonics in the photocurrent were measured by a fast Fourier transformer (FFT).Figure6 shows η (the ratio of each harmonic current to that of the fundamental wave) in the case of the optical-beat frequency of 1, 2 THz, and single-wavelength irradiation of the laser light. The harmonic components due to the waveform distortion of the signal source itself are also shown (the triangles), which represents the lower sensitivity limit in our measuring system. The maximum order (n=35) represents upper frequency limit in our measuring system. In the case of the optical beat of 1 THz (the blue-colored circles), many harmonics were observed. The second-order harmonic rapidly decreases, and the harmonics over the third-order gradually decrease as the order of harmonics increases. In the case of the optical beat of 2 THz (the yellow-colored circles), η is slightly lower than that for the optical-beat frequency of 1 THz. Therefore, η tends to decrease as the optical-beat frequency increases. In the case of single-wavelength irradiation (i.e., no optical beating) of the laser light, the plots (the squares) almost overlap with those of the signal source (the triangles). Therefore, it is known that the harmonics in the case of the single-wavelength irradiation are below the lower sensitivity limit of the measuring system, or the harmonics are scarcely generated. These experimental results suggest that the current waveform of the signal (600 Hz) is distorted by the modulated photoconductance with the THz frequency, generating the high-order harmonics in the photocurrent. Detailed mechanism on the harmonic generation in the PC device is being investigated.Figure 6
Efficiency of the high-order harmonic generation (η) in the PC device (fundamental frequency: 600 Hz). The source represents the lower sensitivity limit in the measuring system. η in the cases of dual-wavelength irradiation (optical-beat frequency of 1 and 2 THz) is larger than that in the case of single-wavelength irradiation (no optical beating).The solid line represents the fitted line to the plots for the optical beat of 1 and 2 THz.η in dB is expressed as(1)η={-80dB(n=2),-3.8dB/octave(n≥3),
where the plots for n≥32 are not included in the fitting calculation because of low sensitivity at the band edge of the FFT. According to studies on the generation and homodyne detection of the cw THz wave by the pioneers [3, 8], the PC device has an almost flat response up to 600 GHz and a role-off response for over 600 GHz. The cutoff frequency (600 GHz) depends on the time constant of the PC device tested. Therefore, when the low order harmonics of the microwave generated by the diode are, instead of the signal (600 Hz) mentioned above, applied to the PC device, the high-order harmonics with the sub-THz to THz region are generated in the PC device.


## 3.3. Measurement of the Optical-Beat Frequency

Using the periodic photocurrent peaks obtained when the microwave frequency was swept, the optical-beat frequency in the THz region was measured. The blue-colored peaks shown in Figure7 are, the same plots as shown in Figure 4(a), the measured photocurrent variation for the optical-beat frequency of 1 THz under the conditions of P0=4 mW, Pmw=-40 dBm, and Vs=20 V. Figure 8 shows a schematic diagram of a double-stage harmonic generator consists of the diode and PC device. The mth order harmonic is generated by the diode and fed to the PC device, and then the nth order harmonic is generated by the PC device from the mth order harmonic fed from the diode. That is, the mth order harmonic acts as the source of the nth order harmonic in the PC device. The harmonic frequency f3(i) defined by the orders m and n is expressed as (2)f3(i)=mnfc(i)(i=1,2,…),
where i is the identification number of the photocurrent peaks shown in Figure 7 and fc(i) is a central frequency of the microwave for the ith peak. fc(i) is determined by fitting a following Gaussian function:
(3)y(i)=ai+biexp⁡[-(fmw-fc(i)2Δf(i))2](i=1,2,…),
to the ith peak, where fmw is the swept frequency of the microwave, ai and bi are constants for each peak, andΔf(i) is the peak width in which the photocurrent decreases to 1/e relative to that at the Gaussian top. The fitted curves are shown by the solid lines in Figure 7. Numerical examples of fc(i) and corresponding m and n for the seven peaks (i=1to7) are listed in Table 1.Table 1
Numerical examples of the central frequencyfc(i) and its harmonic frequency f3(i) for the seven peaks in Figure 7 (optical-beat frequency: 1 THz). i is the identification number of the peak. m and n are the candidate orders of the harmonics for the diode and PC device, respectively. mn is a total order of the harmonics. The asterisks are the determined combinations of m and n for each peak (see the text).
ifc(i) (GHz)mnmnf3(i) (GHz)116.10312164641030.600*232641030.600416641030.600216.34376163631029.657*321631029.657316.61971162621030.422*231621030.422416.88374161611029.908*517.16645160601029.987*230601029.987320601029.987415601029.987512601029.987617.47100159591030.789*717.75825158581029.979*229581029.979Figure 7
Determination of the central frequencyfc(i) of the ith peak for optical beating at 1 THz. The blue-colored plots (same as Figure 4(a)) represent the measured periodic peaks. The solid lines are the fitted curves defined by (3) for each peak. fc(i) is determined as the frequency at each Gaussian top. Δf(i) is the peak width for the ith peak. Numerical examples for the seven peaks (i=1-7) are listed in Table 1.Figure 8
Double-stage harmonic generator consisting of the diode and PC device.The ordersm and n are determined as follows. Since a maximum frequency of the signal fed to the PC device is considered to be restricted to 100 GHz as described in Section 3.2, the order m must satisfy
(4)mfc(i)≤100GHz.
In addition, using the frequency of 1028±5 GHz measured by the homodyne detection described in Section 2 as the coarse frequency, the order n must satisfy(5)|f3(i)-1028|<5GHz.
For the peak i=1 in Table 1, three candidates of (m=1, n=64), (2, 32), and (4, 16) satisfy (4) and (5). For the peak i=2, two candidates of (1, 63) and (3, 21) satisfy (4) and (5). Whereas for the peak i=4 and i=6, only one candidate (m=1) satisfies (4) and (5). As explained in Section 3.1, the periodic peaks were observed within the microwave power variation of about ±3 dB around the optimum microwave power of −40 dBm. That is, the periodic peaks are not generated when the microwave power is stronger or weaker than the optimum microwave power by over 3 dB. While reasons for the dependence on the microwave power are not clarified at present, we utilize only its property to determine the harmonic order of the microwave. Since the efficiency of the harmonic generation of the diode is −20 dB/octave, the power of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th harmonic generated by the diode is lower than that of the fundamental (m=1) by 20, 31.6, 40, and 46.4 dB, respectively. Accordingly, the power differences among the harmonics for m=1-5 are much larger than 3 dB. Hence, the order m for all peaks must be common. Consequently, m=1 is determined to be the common order for all peaks. The resultant n and f3(i) for m=1 are indicated by the asterisks in Table 1. It is seen in Table 1 that the high-order harmonics with the frequencies up to the THz region are generated by the PC device from the fundamental (m=1) of the microwave. The total orders mn for each peak are shown in Figure 7. It can be understood that the periodic peak is generated when the harmonic with the 64th to 52th order is sequentially tuned to the optical beat as the microwave frequency is swept from 16 to 20 GHz. In addition, the high-order harmonics (the source of them is the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th order harmonic produced by the diode) are generated by the PC device. However, they does not contribute to the periodic peak generation, because the power levels for m=2-5 relative to that for m=1 are much lower than 3 dB.Distribution of the resultant frequencyf3(i) is shown by the plots in Figure 9(a). The peak width mnΔf(i)obtained by (3) is shown by the length of the upper and lower error bar and is also plotted in Figure 9(b). The optical-beat frequency fT is defined as an average of f3(i) and given by(6)fT=1M∑i=1Mf3(i),
where M is the repeat times of the measurement. According to the ANSI/ASME performance test codes PTC19.1 [11], the total error δT consists of the bias error δB and random error δR and is given by
(7)δT=δB+δR.
The bias error is constant and roughly estimated to be δB≈0.1 GHz (the frequency instability of the high-order harmonics of the microwave: 200 kHz at 1 THz, and the data processing error: 50 MHz). The random error in our experiment is expressed as
(8)δR=σ1+σ2,
where σ1 is the long-term frequency instability of the light source including the microwave generator, which is obtained as the standard deviation of the fluctuation of f3(i) shown in Figure 9(a) and given by
(9)σ1=∑i=1M(f3(i)-fT)2M-1,σ2 is the short-term frequency instability of the light source, and is obtained as the standard deviation for the ith peak (namely, the peak width mnΔf(i)). σ2 is improved by M-times repetition measurements and given by(10)σ2=∑i=1M(mnΔf(i))2M.Distribution of (a) the determined harmonic frequencyf3(i) (plots) and its peak width mnΔf(i) (error bars) for the high-order harmonics, and (b) the peak width mnΔf(i). The optical beat frequencyfT is defined as an average of f3(i). σ1 and σ2  are the standard deviations of f3(i) andmnΔf(i), respectively. The random error is given by σ1+σ2 (see the text).
(a)(b)Substituting the measured frequenciesf3(i) in Figure 9(a) to (6), the optical-beat frequency is determined to be fT=1030.3 GHz, where M=13, because the frequency measurements are repeated by 13 times during sweeping the microwave frequency from 16 to 20 GHz. By substituting fT into (9), the long-term frequency instability is obtained to be σ1=0.33 GHz. Substituting mnΔf(i) in Figure 9(b) into (10), the short-term frequency instability is obtained to be σ2=3.3 GHz. Using σ1 and σ2, δR=3.63 GHz by (8). Finally, the total error results in δT=3.73 GHz by (7).SinceδT≈σ2, the total error is dominated by the frequency fluctuations of the light source (DW-DBR-LD). If the frequencies of the light source are completely stabilized (i.e., σ2=0), the total error becomes δT=δB+σ1=0.43 GHz. Since σ1 includes the long-term frequency instabilities of the light source and can be reduced by improvements of the light source, the total-error limit (i.e., the measurement error) of the proposed method is estimated to be less than 0.43 GHz. δT is reduced to about 1/12 and 1/28 compared with the frequency error of the transceiver-type homodyne detection (±5 GHz) and the optical spectrometer (±12 GHz), respectively. The total error of 0.43 GHz is the same error as the Fourier-transformed interferometer with a scanning range of 0.35 m.The proposed method readily presents a compact frequency meter for the cw THz-wave generator with a photomixer. In addition, if the oscillation frequencies of the two laser beams are controlled so as to reduce the peak width of the photocurrent response, the frequency of the emitted THz wave can be stabilized, which will realize a high-precision signal generator in the THz region and a high-resolution THz spectrometer.


## 4. Conclusions

A new method for measuring the frequency of the optical beat in the THz region is presented. By applying the microwave signal to the PC device via the step recovery diode, it has been found that the periodic peaks are caused in the photocurrent when the microwave frequency is swept. These peaks are generated by the homodyne detection of the optical beat with the high-order harmonics of the microwave when the frequency of the high-order harmonic coincides with the optical-beat frequency. Furthermore, it has been found that the high-order harmonics of the microwave are generated by the PC device due to the nonlinearity of the PC device and the efficiency of the high-order harmonic generation is about −3.8 dB/octave. The physical mechanism of the harmonic generation by the PC device is being investigated.The periodic peaks generated by the homodyne detection were observed when the microwave was swept from 16 to 20 GHz with a power of −40 dBm. Using the peak frequencies and the harmonic orders, the optical beat frequency was measured to be 1030.3 GHz. The frequency error was measured to be 3.73 GHz, which was dominated by the frequency fluctuation of the light source. The measurement error of the proposed method is estimated to be less than 0.43 GHz.The proposed method is constructed by simply adding a diode and capacitor to a conventional PC device, realizing a compact THz frequency meter in a cw THz-wave generator with a photomixer. If the microwave signal generator is calibrated by a frequency standard, for example, a cesium-based frequency standard, optical-beat frequencies in the THz region can be precisely measured.



---

*Source: 230615-2011-05-26.xml*