# Microwave-Assisted Method for Simultaneous Hydrolysis and Extraction for Preparation of Geniposidic Acid fromEucommia ulmoides Bark Using Basic Imidazolide Ionic Liquid

Authors: Lili Li; Yupin Guo; Chunchao Zhao; Mengxia Wei; Junling Liu; Yuangang Zu; Fei Wang; Lei Yang
Journal: International Journal of Chemical Engineering
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

In order to hydrolyze geniposide and extract geniposidic acid, a novel microwave irradiation heating method for simultaneous hydrolysis and extraction for preparation of geniposidic acid fromEucommia ulmoides bark using basic imidazolide ionic liquid was developed in this work. Basic ionic liquid paired by imidazolide anion and 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium cation ([C6mim]Im) was used as a dual hydrolysis catalyst and extraction solvent in the proposed approach. The optimal concentration of [C6mim]Im was 0.4 mol/L. And the independent parameters optimized by Box-Behnken design (BBD) based on single-factor tests were as follows: microwave irradiation time of 20 min at power of 415 W and liquid-solid ratio of 15 mL/g. Yield of geniposidic acid was increased to 3.41
±
0.17 μmol/g. DM130 macroporous resin, after reaction, was selected to separate geniposidic acid from hydrolysate. The plant materials with different treatment were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and thermogravimetric analysis (TG). The analysis of SEM and TG further indicated that IMSHE is an efficient preparation method for geniposidic acid. It is reasonable to assume that the method and the dual hydrolysis catalyst and extraction solvent would offer an alternative for the preparation of some other kinds of bioactive substances from plant materials.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Eucommia ulmoides, belonging to Eucommiaceae, is a unique kind of plant in China. TheE. ulmoides bark has been used as tonic herbs for more than 2000 years, and now it is listed in Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Lee et al. [1] and Luo et al. [2] have used it for the treatment of obesity and hypertension. It is also used for strengthening tendons and bones [3], antioxidation, and protecting red blood cell [4, 5]. Previous literatures [6, 7] have reported that some components from bark ofE. ulmoides have antihypertensive effect by releasing vascular relaxing molecules such as nitric oxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor from endothelium. Geniposidic acid, an iridoids compound fromE. ulmoides barks, was proved to be the main antihypertensive component [8]. In addition, geniposidic acid has other pharmacological effects: treating hepatic disorders [9], antitumor and radioprotection [10], hypotensive effect [11], and antiatherosclerotic [12]. However, the existence of geniposidic acid inE. ulmoides bark is very low (0.049%–0.130%) [13], which results in its high price.Geniposide is another important component ofE. ulmoides bark, which can be hydrolyzed by sodium hydroxide solution to produce geniposidic acid [14]. Steps needed for the preparation of geniposidic acid are as follows: (1) extraction of geniposide with appropriate concentration of organic solvent; (2) isolation of crude extracts (containing geniposide) from plant materials; (3) removing extraction solvent from crude extracts; (4) adding sodium hydroxide solution to the crude extracts and hydrolyzing geniposide to geniposidic acid under the appropriate conditions. The above scheme has some limitations, such as requirement of tedious procedure, long hydrolysis time, high energy consumption, and harsh hydrolysis conditions. Therefore, development of simple, high-yielding, efficient, and environmentally-friendly approach using a new dual solvent-catalyst for the hydrolysis of geniposide is an important task.Recently, some reports have demonstrated that ionic liquids can replace conventional volatile organic solvents because the ionic liquids possess unique chemical and physical characteristics in many fields [15–17]. Generally, ionic liquids were used for extracting various active constituents from plant materials including polyphenolic compounds [18] and lignans [19, 20] because ionic liquids can decompose cellulose of cell wall [21, 22], inducing releasing the intracellular bioactive constituents from plant cell walls. Furthermore, microwave irradiation has gained extensive attention in many fields as a high efficiency, energy conservation, and easy control energy source because the materials can be heated internally rapidly. Additionally, Liu et al. [23] and Chen et al. [24] have proved that microwave irradiation can dramatically improve the performance of ionic liquids because the ionic liquids have excellent microwave absorbing abilities. It is difficult to use conventional ionic liquids as catalysts in various chemical reactions due to the properties of low alkalinity [25]. Chen et al. [26] firstly reported that imidazolide basic ionic liquids with strong alkalinity have promising application prospects in replacement of traditional basic catalysts such as sodium hydroxide and Zawadzki et al. [27] used it as extraction solvent; hence it could be used as dual solvents-catalysts. They are flexible, nonvolatile, reusable, and immiscible with many organic solvents [27, 28]. So far, there is no research in the literature about preparing geniposidic acid by hydrolysis and simultaneous extraction using imidazolide basic ionic liquids.In this paper, microwave-assisted method for simultaneous hydrolysis and extraction using basic imidazolide ionic liquid (IMSHE) was developed for preparation of geniposidic acid fromE. ulmoides bark. The performance of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium imidazolide was compared with acetate radical and hydroxide radical anions in this paper. Five different cations with the same anion were also studied. And 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium imidazolide ([C6mim]Im) was selected as the dual solvent-catalyst in IMSHE processes. The hydrolysis mechanism is given in Figure 1. Various parameters of IMSHE were systematically studied including concentration of [C6mim]Im, microwave irradiation power and time, and dosage of solvent. After being treated with different processes, the plant materials were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and thermogravimetric analysis (TG).Figure 1
Hydrolysis mechanism of geniposide to form geniposidic acid.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Material and Chemicals

The bark ofE. ulmoides gained from Tongrentang Ltd. (Harbin, Heilongjiang, China) was ground and then sieved (150–250 μm). Geniposide and geniposidic acid references (98% purity) were obtained from the Sigma Aldrich Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ionic liquids used in the present study including [C4mim]OH, [C6mim]OH, [C8mim]OH, [C4mim]OAc, [C6mim]OAc, [C8mim]OAc, [C2mim]Im, [C4mim]Im, [C6mim]Im, [C8mim]Im, and [C10mim]Im ([C2mim]+ is 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium positive ion, [C4mim]+ is 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium positive ion, [C6mim]+ is 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium positive ion, [C8mim]+ is 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium positive ion, [C10mim]+ is 1-decyl-3-methylimidazolium positive ion, OH− is hydroxide radical negative ion, OAc− is acetate radical negative ion, and Im− is imidazolide radical negative ion) bought from Chengjie Chemical Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and were used without any other treatment. Methanol, acetonitrile, and glacial acetic acid purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Shanghai, China) for HPLC analysis were of chromatographic grade. Petroleum ether (boiling in the range of 60°C to 90°C) and sodium hydroxide were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China).


### 2.2. High Performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis

A high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system consisted of a 1525 model pump, a 717 plus model autosampler, and 2487 model ultraviolet detector (Waters Corporation, Milford Massachusetts, USA) which were employed for HPLC analyses. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Hypersil BDS C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5μm, Dalian Elite Analytical Instruments Co., Ltd., Liaoning, China).Separation was conducted by isocratic mode with a 10μL of injection volume at room temperature. Before use, the mobile phase and sample solution must be degassed using an ultrasonic bath after passing through a 450 nm membrane filter (Aladdin, Shanghai, China).The detection wavelength of geniposidic acid and geniposide was observed at 240 nm. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. The system of methanol-water-glacial acetic acid (25 : 75 : 1.5, v/v/v) was used to separate geniposidic acid and geniposide. HPLC chromatograms achieved baseline separation of geniposidic acid and geniposide within 30 min. The retention times of geniposidic acid and geniposide were 5.95 and 18.21 min, respectively. Calibration curves of geniposidic acid and geniposide wereY
G
e
n
i
p
o
s
i
d
i
c
a
c
i
d
=
20147544
x
+
28491 (R
2
=
0.9996) and Y
G
e
n
i
p
o
s
i
d
e
=
19948741
x
-
33505 (R
2
=
0.9997). Good linearities were observed for each compound when the concentration varies from 0.02 to 0.5 mg/mL, respectively.The standards were accurately weighted and mixed with methanol to prepare stock solutions with a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. The stock solutions were stored at 4°C before HPLC analysis. The above solutions were diluted with methanol to construct calibration curves.


### 2.3. Pretreatment ofE. ulmoides Bark

The lipid ofE. ulmoides bark (100.0 g) was extracted by hot reflux extraction for 2 h in 1000 mL of petroleum ether. The mixture was filtered immediately when it is hot. The residue was extracted twice under the same conditions as described above. The degreased material was dried and used throughout.


### 2.4. IMSHE Procedure

For IMSHE, different ionic liquids were accurately weighed (molar mass) and mixed with deionized water to prepare ionic liquid aqueous solutions. Dried degreased sample powder was mixed with the above solutions in 25 mL flasks, respectively. Subsequently, the flasks were placed into microwave oven (Sineo Chemical Equipment Corp., Shanghai, China). The optimum anions and cations, concentration of ionic liquid, irradiation power and time, and dosage of solvent were studied by a series of single-factor tests. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.


### 2.5. Optimization of IMSHE by Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

The three independent parameters, that is, irradiation power and time and the liquid-solid ratio optimized by Box-Behnken design (BBD), were carried out by Design-Expert 8.0.5 software. The range and level of the three factors which were used in the optimization study and the experimental design matrix are specified in Table1.Table 1
Experimental design matrix to screen for variables that determine the yield of geniposidic acid and ANOVA resultsa.
(a)
Run
BBD experiments
X
1
b
X
2
X
3
Y
1
15 (0)
15 (−1)
540 (+1)
2.98
2
15 (0)
15 (−1)
230 (−1)
2.58
3
15 (0)
25 (+1)
230 (−1)
2.87
4
20 (+1)
25 (+1)
385 (0)
3.30
5
10 (−1)
25 (+1)
385 (0)
3.02
6
20 (+1)
20 (0)
230 (−1)
2.72
7
20 (+1)
15 (−1)
385 (0)
3.48
8
20 (+1)
20 (0)
540 (+1)
2.85
9
10 (−1)
15 (−1)
385 (0)
2.82
10
15 (0)
20 (0)
385 (0)
3.30
11
10 (−1)
20 (0)
540 (+1)
2.63
12
15 (0)
20 (0)
385 (0)
3.25
13
15 (0)
20 (0)
385 (0)
3.12
14
15 (0)
20 (0)
385 (0)
3.15
15
15 (0)
20 (0)
385 (0)
3.22
16
15 (0)
25 (+1)
540 (+1)
2.68
17
10 (−1)
20 (0)
230 (−1)
2.34
(b)
ANOVA
Source
Sum of squares
Degree of freedom
Mean square
F-value
P value
Model
1.49
9
0.17
28.49
0.0001c
X
1
0.30
1
0.30
51.43
0.0002c
X
2
3.5
×
10
-
6
1
3.5
×
10
-
6
6
.
1
×
10
-
4
0.9810
X
3
0.050
1
0.050
8.68
0.0215c
X
1
X
2
0.036
1
0.036
6.17
0.0420c
X
1
X
3
7
.
7
×
10
-
3
1
7
.
7
×
10
-
3
1.33
0.2874
X
2
X
3
0.085
1
0.085
14.67
0.0065c
X
1
2
0.040
1
0.040
6.85
0.0346c
X
2
2
8.4
×
10
-
3
1
8.4
×
10
-
3
1.45
0.2673
X
3
2
0.95
1
0.95
163.18
<0.0001c
Residual
0.041
7
5
.
8
×
10
-
3
Lack of fit
0.020
3
6.6
×
10
-
3
1.28
0.3942
Pure error
0.021
4
5
.
2
×
10
-
3
Cor total
1.53
16
Credibility analysis of the regression equations
Standard deviation
Mean
Coefficient of variation%
R
2
AdjustedR
2
Adequacy precision
0.08
2.96
2.57
0.9734
0.9393
19.23
aThe results were obtained with Design-Expert 7.0 software.
b
X
1 is the microwave irradiation time (min), X
2 is the liquid-solid ratio (mL/g), X
3 is the microwave irradiation power (W), and Y is the yield of geniposidic acid (μmol/g).
cSignificant at P
<
0.05.


### 2.6. Separation of Geniposidic Acid

#### 2.6.1. Adsorbents

Macroporous resins including HPD80, HPD100B, D101, HPD722, DM130, HPD400A, HPD600, and HPD500 were purchased from Baoen Chemical Co., Ltd. (Hebei, China). Prior to the adsorption experiments, weighed amounts of macroporous resins were soaked in 80% ethanol and subsequently washed by deionized water thoroughly. The physical properties and moisture contents of macroporous resins were shown in Table2.Table 2
Adsorbing capacity and desorption ratio of the test macroporous resins.
Trade name
Polarity
Surface area (m2/g)
Moisture contents (%)
Adsorbing capacity (μmol/g)
Desorption ratio (%)
HPD80
Nonpolar
350–400
67.97
0.82
93.25
HPD100B
Nonpolar
500–580
66.89
0.93
89.57
D101
Weak-polar
400–600
66.76
1.18
56.36
HPD722
Weak-polar
485–530
73.55
1.33
48.96
DM130
Middle-polar
500–550
64.32
1.98
91.23
HPD400A
Middle-polar
500–550
65.99
2.09
78.36
HPD600
Polar
550–600
58.97
1.46
65.12
HPD500
Polar
500–550
65.63
1.25
71.53


#### 2.6.2. Static Adsorption and Desorption Tests

The static adsorption tests of geniposidic acid were carried out as follows: 1.00 g absolute dry weight hydrated tested macroporous resins were put into flask with a lid, and then 10 mL hydrolysate of geniposide was added. The concentration of geniposidic acid was 0.23μmol/mL. The flasks were put into a water bath at 30°C for 24 h. 1 mL hydrolysate was centrifuged prior to HPLC for determination of geniposidic acid.After adsorption equilibrium was reached, the resins were first washed by deionized water and then desorbed with 10 mL 20% ethanol. The flask was shaken (120 rpm) at a constant temperature of 25°C for 4 h. The concentration of geniposidic acid in desorption solution was analyzed by HPLC.


### 2.7. SEM

After being dried, the sectioned particles of the materials treated with various processes were observed by an S-520 model scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi, San Jose, CA, USA) under high vacuum condition at 10 kV (20μm, 5000x magnification).


### 2.8. TG

Materials were weighed and then heated by a Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGS-2, PerkinElmer, USA) with a heating rate of 5°C/min using nitrogen flow 50 mL/min. The percentage weight loss of tested samples was measured from 50 to 800°C.


### 2.9. Comparison of IMSHE with Reference Method

For IMSHE, experiments were performed under the optimal operating conditions obtained by RSM. For hot reflux simultaneous hydrolysis and extraction procedure (IHRSHE), 10.0 g dried sample was added into 150 mL of 0.4 mol/L of [C6mim]Im and then heated by an electric heating jacket at 450 W for 120 min. Compared with traditional microwave irradiation extraction (MSHE) and hot reflux extraction (HRSHE), 0.4 mol/L NaOH takes the place of the 0.4 mol/L of [C6mim]Im as solvent to hydrolyze the geniposide, and other conditions were the same as IMSHE and IHRSHE.


### 2.10. Statistical Analysis

One-way analysis was used for analyzing the significant differences in all experimental results. All data were the average of three parallel measurements, which were expressed as the yield means ± standard deviation.


## 2.1. Material and Chemicals

The bark ofE. ulmoides gained from Tongrentang Ltd. (Harbin, Heilongjiang, China) was ground and then sieved (150–250 μm). Geniposide and geniposidic acid references (98% purity) were obtained from the Sigma Aldrich Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ionic liquids used in the present study including [C4mim]OH, [C6mim]OH, [C8mim]OH, [C4mim]OAc, [C6mim]OAc, [C8mim]OAc, [C2mim]Im, [C4mim]Im, [C6mim]Im, [C8mim]Im, and [C10mim]Im ([C2mim]+ is 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium positive ion, [C4mim]+ is 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium positive ion, [C6mim]+ is 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium positive ion, [C8mim]+ is 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium positive ion, [C10mim]+ is 1-decyl-3-methylimidazolium positive ion, OH− is hydroxide radical negative ion, OAc− is acetate radical negative ion, and Im− is imidazolide radical negative ion) bought from Chengjie Chemical Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and were used without any other treatment. Methanol, acetonitrile, and glacial acetic acid purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Shanghai, China) for HPLC analysis were of chromatographic grade. Petroleum ether (boiling in the range of 60°C to 90°C) and sodium hydroxide were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China).


## 2.2. High Performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis

A high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system consisted of a 1525 model pump, a 717 plus model autosampler, and 2487 model ultraviolet detector (Waters Corporation, Milford Massachusetts, USA) which were employed for HPLC analyses. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Hypersil BDS C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5μm, Dalian Elite Analytical Instruments Co., Ltd., Liaoning, China).Separation was conducted by isocratic mode with a 10μL of injection volume at room temperature. Before use, the mobile phase and sample solution must be degassed using an ultrasonic bath after passing through a 450 nm membrane filter (Aladdin, Shanghai, China).The detection wavelength of geniposidic acid and geniposide was observed at 240 nm. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. The system of methanol-water-glacial acetic acid (25 : 75 : 1.5, v/v/v) was used to separate geniposidic acid and geniposide. HPLC chromatograms achieved baseline separation of geniposidic acid and geniposide within 30 min. The retention times of geniposidic acid and geniposide were 5.95 and 18.21 min, respectively. Calibration curves of geniposidic acid and geniposide wereY
G
e
n
i
p
o
s
i
d
i
c
a
c
i
d
=
20147544
x
+
28491 (R
2
=
0.9996) and Y
G
e
n
i
p
o
s
i
d
e
=
19948741
x
-
33505 (R
2
=
0.9997). Good linearities were observed for each compound when the concentration varies from 0.02 to 0.5 mg/mL, respectively.The standards were accurately weighted and mixed with methanol to prepare stock solutions with a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. The stock solutions were stored at 4°C before HPLC analysis. The above solutions were diluted with methanol to construct calibration curves.


## 2.3. Pretreatment ofE. ulmoides Bark

The lipid ofE. ulmoides bark (100.0 g) was extracted by hot reflux extraction for 2 h in 1000 mL of petroleum ether. The mixture was filtered immediately when it is hot. The residue was extracted twice under the same conditions as described above. The degreased material was dried and used throughout.


## 2.4. IMSHE Procedure

For IMSHE, different ionic liquids were accurately weighed (molar mass) and mixed with deionized water to prepare ionic liquid aqueous solutions. Dried degreased sample powder was mixed with the above solutions in 25 mL flasks, respectively. Subsequently, the flasks were placed into microwave oven (Sineo Chemical Equipment Corp., Shanghai, China). The optimum anions and cations, concentration of ionic liquid, irradiation power and time, and dosage of solvent were studied by a series of single-factor tests. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.


## 2.5. Optimization of IMSHE by Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

The three independent parameters, that is, irradiation power and time and the liquid-solid ratio optimized by Box-Behnken design (BBD), were carried out by Design-Expert 8.0.5 software. The range and level of the three factors which were used in the optimization study and the experimental design matrix are specified in Table1.Table 1
Experimental design matrix to screen for variables that determine the yield of geniposidic acid and ANOVA resultsa.
(a)
Run
BBD experiments
X
1
b
X
2
X
3
Y
1
15 (0)
15 (−1)
540 (+1)
2.98
2
15 (0)
15 (−1)
230 (−1)
2.58
3
15 (0)
25 (+1)
230 (−1)
2.87
4
20 (+1)
25 (+1)
385 (0)
3.30
5
10 (−1)
25 (+1)
385 (0)
3.02
6
20 (+1)
20 (0)
230 (−1)
2.72
7
20 (+1)
15 (−1)
385 (0)
3.48
8
20 (+1)
20 (0)
540 (+1)
2.85
9
10 (−1)
15 (−1)
385 (0)
2.82
10
15 (0)
20 (0)
385 (0)
3.30
11
10 (−1)
20 (0)
540 (+1)
2.63
12
15 (0)
20 (0)
385 (0)
3.25
13
15 (0)
20 (0)
385 (0)
3.12
14
15 (0)
20 (0)
385 (0)
3.15
15
15 (0)
20 (0)
385 (0)
3.22
16
15 (0)
25 (+1)
540 (+1)
2.68
17
10 (−1)
20 (0)
230 (−1)
2.34
(b)
ANOVA
Source
Sum of squares
Degree of freedom
Mean square
F-value
P value
Model
1.49
9
0.17
28.49
0.0001c
X
1
0.30
1
0.30
51.43
0.0002c
X
2
3.5
×
10
-
6
1
3.5
×
10
-
6
6
.
1
×
10
-
4
0.9810
X
3
0.050
1
0.050
8.68
0.0215c
X
1
X
2
0.036
1
0.036
6.17
0.0420c
X
1
X
3
7
.
7
×
10
-
3
1
7
.
7
×
10
-
3
1.33
0.2874
X
2
X
3
0.085
1
0.085
14.67
0.0065c
X
1
2
0.040
1
0.040
6.85
0.0346c
X
2
2
8.4
×
10
-
3
1
8.4
×
10
-
3
1.45
0.2673
X
3
2
0.95
1
0.95
163.18
<0.0001c
Residual
0.041
7
5
.
8
×
10
-
3
Lack of fit
0.020
3
6.6
×
10
-
3
1.28
0.3942
Pure error
0.021
4
5
.
2
×
10
-
3
Cor total
1.53
16
Credibility analysis of the regression equations
Standard deviation
Mean
Coefficient of variation%
R
2
AdjustedR
2
Adequacy precision
0.08
2.96
2.57
0.9734
0.9393
19.23
aThe results were obtained with Design-Expert 7.0 software.
b
X
1 is the microwave irradiation time (min), X
2 is the liquid-solid ratio (mL/g), X
3 is the microwave irradiation power (W), and Y is the yield of geniposidic acid (μmol/g).
cSignificant at P
<
0.05.


## 2.6. Separation of Geniposidic Acid

### 2.6.1. Adsorbents

Macroporous resins including HPD80, HPD100B, D101, HPD722, DM130, HPD400A, HPD600, and HPD500 were purchased from Baoen Chemical Co., Ltd. (Hebei, China). Prior to the adsorption experiments, weighed amounts of macroporous resins were soaked in 80% ethanol and subsequently washed by deionized water thoroughly. The physical properties and moisture contents of macroporous resins were shown in Table2.Table 2
Adsorbing capacity and desorption ratio of the test macroporous resins.
Trade name
Polarity
Surface area (m2/g)
Moisture contents (%)
Adsorbing capacity (μmol/g)
Desorption ratio (%)
HPD80
Nonpolar
350–400
67.97
0.82
93.25
HPD100B
Nonpolar
500–580
66.89
0.93
89.57
D101
Weak-polar
400–600
66.76
1.18
56.36
HPD722
Weak-polar
485–530
73.55
1.33
48.96
DM130
Middle-polar
500–550
64.32
1.98
91.23
HPD400A
Middle-polar
500–550
65.99
2.09
78.36
HPD600
Polar
550–600
58.97
1.46
65.12
HPD500
Polar
500–550
65.63
1.25
71.53


### 2.6.2. Static Adsorption and Desorption Tests

The static adsorption tests of geniposidic acid were carried out as follows: 1.00 g absolute dry weight hydrated tested macroporous resins were put into flask with a lid, and then 10 mL hydrolysate of geniposide was added. The concentration of geniposidic acid was 0.23μmol/mL. The flasks were put into a water bath at 30°C for 24 h. 1 mL hydrolysate was centrifuged prior to HPLC for determination of geniposidic acid.After adsorption equilibrium was reached, the resins were first washed by deionized water and then desorbed with 10 mL 20% ethanol. The flask was shaken (120 rpm) at a constant temperature of 25°C for 4 h. The concentration of geniposidic acid in desorption solution was analyzed by HPLC.


## 2.6.1. Adsorbents

Macroporous resins including HPD80, HPD100B, D101, HPD722, DM130, HPD400A, HPD600, and HPD500 were purchased from Baoen Chemical Co., Ltd. (Hebei, China). Prior to the adsorption experiments, weighed amounts of macroporous resins were soaked in 80% ethanol and subsequently washed by deionized water thoroughly. The physical properties and moisture contents of macroporous resins were shown in Table2.Table 2
Adsorbing capacity and desorption ratio of the test macroporous resins.
Trade name
Polarity
Surface area (m2/g)
Moisture contents (%)
Adsorbing capacity (μmol/g)
Desorption ratio (%)
HPD80
Nonpolar
350–400
67.97
0.82
93.25
HPD100B
Nonpolar
500–580
66.89
0.93
89.57
D101
Weak-polar
400–600
66.76
1.18
56.36
HPD722
Weak-polar
485–530
73.55
1.33
48.96
DM130
Middle-polar
500–550
64.32
1.98
91.23
HPD400A
Middle-polar
500–550
65.99
2.09
78.36
HPD600
Polar
550–600
58.97
1.46
65.12
HPD500
Polar
500–550
65.63
1.25
71.53


## 2.6.2. Static Adsorption and Desorption Tests

The static adsorption tests of geniposidic acid were carried out as follows: 1.00 g absolute dry weight hydrated tested macroporous resins were put into flask with a lid, and then 10 mL hydrolysate of geniposide was added. The concentration of geniposidic acid was 0.23μmol/mL. The flasks were put into a water bath at 30°C for 24 h. 1 mL hydrolysate was centrifuged prior to HPLC for determination of geniposidic acid.After adsorption equilibrium was reached, the resins were first washed by deionized water and then desorbed with 10 mL 20% ethanol. The flask was shaken (120 rpm) at a constant temperature of 25°C for 4 h. The concentration of geniposidic acid in desorption solution was analyzed by HPLC.


## 2.7. SEM

After being dried, the sectioned particles of the materials treated with various processes were observed by an S-520 model scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi, San Jose, CA, USA) under high vacuum condition at 10 kV (20μm, 5000x magnification).


## 2.8. TG

Materials were weighed and then heated by a Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGS-2, PerkinElmer, USA) with a heating rate of 5°C/min using nitrogen flow 50 mL/min. The percentage weight loss of tested samples was measured from 50 to 800°C.


## 2.9. Comparison of IMSHE with Reference Method

For IMSHE, experiments were performed under the optimal operating conditions obtained by RSM. For hot reflux simultaneous hydrolysis and extraction procedure (IHRSHE), 10.0 g dried sample was added into 150 mL of 0.4 mol/L of [C6mim]Im and then heated by an electric heating jacket at 450 W for 120 min. Compared with traditional microwave irradiation extraction (MSHE) and hot reflux extraction (HRSHE), 0.4 mol/L NaOH takes the place of the 0.4 mol/L of [C6mim]Im as solvent to hydrolyze the geniposide, and other conditions were the same as IMSHE and IHRSHE.


## 2.10. Statistical Analysis

One-way analysis was used for analyzing the significant differences in all experimental results. All data were the average of three parallel measurements, which were expressed as the yield means ± standard deviation.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Screening of Basic Ionic Liquid

#### 3.1.1. Effect of Anion

Previous studies have demonstrated the influence of the structure of ionic liquid on their physical and chemical characteristics [29, 30], which affect the reaction or extraction efficiency. Recently researches have reported the application of ionic liquid on the hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose and the synthesis of biodiesel [31, 32]. To evaluate the extracting capability and the hydrolytic ability of geniposide fromE. ulmoides bark, the ionic liquids with different methylimidazolium cations and anions were studied in this paper.Chen et al. [26] reported that the anion of ionic liquid can influence pKb value and thus influences catalytic properties. The 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium with three different anions (Im−, OAc−, and OH−), therefore, was investigated. Samples (0.5 g) were added into 10 mL different ionic liquid solutions with the same concentration of 0.2 mol/L. The mixtures were irradiated at 385 W for 10 min. As shown in Figure 2(a), different anions significantly influenced the IMSHE process. The yield of geniposidic acid treated with [C6mim]Im was 2.8
±
0.11 μmol/g which was much higher than those treated with [C6mim]OH and [C6mim]OAc. Basic imidazolide ionic liquid can hydrolyze cellulose and hemicellulose and dissolve lignin of bark. Therefore, the basic imidazolide ionic liquid not only can hydrolyze geniposide, but also can hydrolyze the cellulose and hemicellulose of cell wall. Before hydrolysis of geniposide, the cell wall was destroyed by basic imidazolide ionic liquid firstly. This could accelerate release and dissolution of geniposide, which can also improve the hydrolysis rate of geniposide efficiently. These results indicated that [C6mim]Im was more efficient than [C6mim]OAc and [C6mim]OH for hydrolyzing geniposide into geniposidic acid. Similar results were obtained in the catalyzing Knoevenagel condensation reaction [26].Figure 2
Effects of different ionic liquids (a) and their concentration (b) on the yield of geniposidic acid fromE. ulmoides bark.
(a)
(b)


#### 3.1.2. Effect of the Alkyl Chain Length

Paduszyński et al. [33] reported the effect of cation functionalization on thermophysical properties of ionic liquids. To gain high conversion rate of geniposide and better yield of geniposidic acid, five ionic liquids with the same anion of Im− and different cations ([C2mim]+, [C4mim]+, [C6mim]+, [C8mim]+, and [C10mim]+) were applied to investigate the impacts of different alkyl on the properties of ionic liquid. Samples (0.5 g) were added into 10 mL different ionic liquid solutions with the same concentration of 0.2 mol/L. The mixtures were irradiated at 385 W for 10 min. Figure 2(a) showed that the yield of geniposidic acid was increased up to 2.80
±
0.11 μmol/g when alkyl changed from ethyl to hexyl. However, the yield of geniposidic acid decreased obviously from 2.80
±
0.11 to 1.35
±
0.06 μmol/g as alkyl chain length increased to decyl. According to the results of comparison experiments, the [C6mim]Im was selected as the optimal catalyst for preparing geniposidic acid in subsequent optimization studies.


#### 3.1.3. Effect of Ionic Liquid Concentration

The same mass of samples as above was added into 10 mL of [C6mim]Im solution with different concentrations (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mol/L) for the purpose of studying the effects of different concentration of [C6mim]Im on the IMSHE process. The mixtures were irradiated at 385 W for 10 min. Figure2(b) presented that the yield of the geniposidic acid was changed from 2.14
±
0.11 to 2.86
±
0.14 μmol/g when the concentration of [C6mim]Im varied from 0.1 to 0.2 mol/L. The yield of geniposidic acid reached its maximum at the concentration of 0.4 mol/L. When further increasing [C6mim]Im concentration, the yield of geniposidic acid changed slightly. This may be because greater [C6mim]Im concentration leads to the greater solubility capacity and stronger alkalinity which could help to break down ester bond of geniposide to form easily carboxy group in alkali solution. Considering the above results, 0.4 mol/L [C6mim]Im was chosen as the suitable concentration for the subsequent experiments.


### 3.2. Optimization of the IMSHE Process by Single-Factor Tests

#### 3.2.1. Effect of Microwave Power and Time

According to previous study [34], the microwave irradiation power was one of the most important factors on account of the fact that the microwave energy might influence the molecular interactions between the solvent and the targeted compounds significantly. Samples (0.5 g) were added into 10 mL of 0.4 mol/L [C6mim]Im aqueous solutions. The mixtures were irradiated at different power (120, 230, 385, 540, and 700 W) for 10 min. In the light of Figure 3(a), the yield of geniposidic acid changed obviously from 1.40
±
0.06 to 2.81
±
0.11 μmol/g when the microwave heating power changed from 120 to 385 W. But, geniposidic acid yield decreased to 2.61
±
0.10 μmol/g when further increasing the power up to 700 W. High microwave irradiation power does not result in high yield of geniposidic acid. This is maybe due to the fact that high irradiation power leads to partial carbonization of samples as internal overheating and the isomerization or degradation of geniposidic acid. This result is similar to those reported by Yao et al. [35] and Liu et al. [23]. Hence, 230–540 W was taken for BBD optimization.Figure 3
Effects of microwave irradiation power (a), microwave irradiation time (b), and liquid-solid ratio (c) on the yield of geniposidic acid.
(a)
(b)
(c)In order to choose optimal treatment time, tests were performed at 385 W for different durations (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min). In the light of Figure3(b), yield of geniposidic acid increased relatively rapidly when the treatment time varied from 5 to 10 min. The yield reached higher values of 3.01
±
0.12 μmol/g at 20 min, and then the yield of geniposidic acid changed little when further prolonging the treatment time. Thus, 10–20 min was selected for BBD optimization.


#### 3.2.2. Effect of Liquid-Solid Ratio

Experiments were performed by different liquid-solid ratio. Samples (0.5 g) were added into different volume (5, 10, 12.5, 15, and 20 mL) of 0.4 mol/L [C6mim]Im solutions. The mixtures were irradiated in the microwave oven at 385 W for 10 min. Figure3(c) illustrated that the geniposidic acid yield increased significantly from 1.89
±
0.10 to 2.82
±
0.14 μmol/g when the volume of solution varied from 5 to 10 mL. When continuing to increase the liquid-solid ratio, the increase of geniposidic acid yield was not significant. In view of saving in material and solvent, a liquid-solid ratio of 15 mL/g to 25 mL/g was selected for BBD optimization.


### 3.3. Optimization Parameters by BBD

According to the results of single-factor experiments, the BBD was used to further evaluate the interactions between the factors including irradiation power and time and liquid-solid ratio. Table1 illustrated that the model is significant because the F-value was 28.49. There is only a 0.01% chance that occurred because of noise. Values of “Prob > F” (X
1, X
3, X
1
X
2, X
2
X
3, X
1
2, and X
3
2) less than 0.0500 demonstrated that these factors are significant. The model terms of X
2 and X
2
2 are indistinctive because they were greater than 0.1000. The “lack of fit F-value” of 1.28 indicates that the “lack of fit” is indistinctive compared with the pure error, which is desirable. The “lack of fit F-value” of 39.42% could occur because of noise. Value of “adequacy precision” was 19.23 which was satisfactory and demonstrated that the model was better enough to navigate the design space.The three-dimensional response surface plots for the mutual effect of single factors on yield of geniposidic acid were shown in Figure4. Figure 4(a) presents the interaction of different treatment time (min) and liquid-solid ratio (mL/g) with the same power. The yield of geniposidic acid was increased significantly when prolonging the duration of microwave treatment. The yield changed gradually as the liquid-solid ratio (mL/g) varied from 15 to 25 mL/g. Figure 4(b) showed the surface plot at different treatment time (min) and power (W) with the same liquid-solid ratio. The yield of geniposidic acid changed little when prolonging the duration. However, the yield increased significantly when the irradiation power changed from 230 to 385 W and subsequently decreased dramatically when further increasing power. Figure 4(c) showed the surface plot at different irradiation power (W) and liquid-solid ratio (mL/g) with a stable treatment time. The yield significantly increased when the power varied from 230 to 385 W and then decreased obviously from 385 to 540 W. This indicated that the irradiation power is more important than liquid-solid ratio for preparation of geniposidic acid. The optimized conditions given by BBD software were as follows: 20 min of treatment time, 415 W of irradiation power, and 15 mL/g of liquid-solid ratio. Under these conditions of point prediction, the total yield was 3.5 μmol/g.Figure 4
Three-dimensional response surface plots for the effect of independent variables on yield of geniposidic acid: (a) microwave irradiation time (min) and liquid-solid ratio (mL/g); (b) microwave irradiation time (min) and microwave irradiation power (W); (c) microwave irradiation power (W) and liquid-solid ratio (mL/g).
(a)
(b)
(c)The verification tests were performed three times under these optimized conditions given by BBD software (20 min of treatment time, 415 W of irradiation power, and 15 mL/g of liquid-solid ratio). The actual yield reached3.41
±
0.17 μmol/g.


### 3.4. Preliminary Separation of Geniposidic Acid Using Macroporous Resin

The adsorption capacity and desorption ratio of geniposidic acid on the eight types of resins are depicted in Table2. In the light of Table 2, the adsorption capacity of geniposidic acid on DM130 and HPD400A macroporous resin was higher than those of other resins. But the desorption ratio of geniposidic acid on DM130 was significantly higher than that of HPD400A (P
<
0.05), which could be attributed to their similarity to the polarity of geniposidic acid. The adsorption capacity of macroporous resins is related to the polarity and the chemical features of the adsorbed substance. Macroporous resins with middle polarity exhibited stronger adsorption abilities to polar substances. The selection of proper macroporous resins should be in accordance with the resins polarities, adsorption capacity, and desorption ratios. The middle-polar macroporous resin DM130 has shown better adsorption capacity and desorption ratio because of its similar polarity with the polar substance geniposidic acid. Hence, DM130 resin was selected to separate the geniposidic acid from the hydrolysate of geniposide.


### 3.5. General Morphology Changes after Treatment with Different Processes

To explain the structural alteration and the mechanism of hydrolysis and extraction during the IMSHE processes, the plant materials with different treatment were analyzed by SEM and TG.


#### 3.5.1. SEM Analysis of Materials

To observe the surface morphology, samples obtained by different processes were determined by SEM. Figure5 showed the surface morphology ofE. ulmoides bark without treatment (a) and after degreasing (b), microwave-assisted water treatment (c), and IMSHE treatment (d), respectively. It can be seen that different extraction procedures produce distinguishable surface morphology changes. The morphological structures represent ordered tracheary cells of the xylem and the surface of the raw material covered with amount of curved filaments (Figure 5(a)). It can be seen that there are few of curved filaments on the surface of degreased material (Figure 5(b)). Compared to raw material, the surface of cells in degreasing sample was almost not changed. After microwave-assisted water treatment (Figure 5(c)), the cell walls had a partial destruction or no destruction leading to some of active substances being still in plant cells. As expected, the plant cell walls were partly destroyed by IMSHE treatment; the cell walls became thinner and disorganised (Figure 5(d)), which resulted in the release of geniposide. This made the hydrolyzing of geniposide easier.Figure 5
The SEM micrographs of raw material (a), degreased material (b), microwave-assisted water treatment material (c), and IMSHE treatment (d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


#### 3.5.2. TG Analysis of Materials

In this part, the thermogravimetric degradation curves of theE. ulmoides bark processed were given in Figure 6. The profile of the TG showed a weight loss between 50 and 800°C. As shown in Figure 6(a, b, and c), raw material, degreased material, and microwave-assisted water treatment material lost more weight than that after IMSHE treatment (Figure 6(d)). It was further indicated that IMSHE is an efficient preparation method for geniposidic acid.Figure 6
Thermogravimetric degradation curves of raw material (a), degreased material (b), microwave-assisted water treatment material (c), and IMSHE treatment (d).


### 3.6. Preliminary Estimation of Cost, Energy, and Environment Ecology

Recently, low cost and energy consumption, high efficiency, and environmentally-friendly method are clearly advantageous for the preparation of the bioactive compounds from plant material. It can be seen from Table3 that the electric consumption of IMSHE and MSHE is only 0.14 kWh which is much lower than those of IHRSHE and HRSHE (0.90 kWh). With the similar geniposidic acid yield, IHRSHE and HRSHE required a more tedious duration (120 min) and higher power (450 W) compared with IMSHE and MSHE (20 min; 415 W). The yield of geniposidic acid per kilowatt hour for IMSHE is 24.36
±
1.22 μmol/g·kWh, which is obviously higher than those of MSHE (2.97
±
0.12 μmol/g·kWh), IHRSHE (3.02
±
0.11 μmol/g·kWh), and HRSHE (2.82
±
0.14 μmol/g·kWh). Additionally, imidazolide basic ionic liquid is efficient for hydrolyzing geniposide compared to NaOH. According to the literatures reported by Ma et al. [36] and Liu et al. [23], to produce 1 kWh by combustion of fossil fuel (coal or fuel), it will reject 800 g of CO2 into the atmosphere. Therefore, 720.00 g of CO2 will be emitted into the atmosphere in the process of IHRSHE and HRSHE, which is 6.4-fold of those of IMSHE and MSHE (112.00 g CO2). This result demonstrated that this is an environmentally-friendly technique for producing bioactive compounds.Table 3
Comparison of economic effect and environmental impact with different methods, mean ± SD (n
=
3).
IMSHE
MSHE
IHRSHE
HRSHE
Solvent
[C6mim]Im
NaOH
[C6mim]Im
NaOH
Electric power (W)
415
450
Electric consumption time (min)
20
120
Electric consumption (kWh)
0.14
0.90
Environmental impact (CO2 emission load, g)
112.00
720.00
Yield of geniposidic acid (μmol/g)
3.41
±
0.17
2.97
±
0.12
3.02
±
0.11
2.82
±
0.14
Yield of geniposidic acid per kilowatt hour (μmol/g⋅kWh)
24.36
±
1.22
20.77
±
1.04
3.36
±
0.168
3.13
±
0.16


## 3.1. Screening of Basic Ionic Liquid

### 3.1.1. Effect of Anion

Previous studies have demonstrated the influence of the structure of ionic liquid on their physical and chemical characteristics [29, 30], which affect the reaction or extraction efficiency. Recently researches have reported the application of ionic liquid on the hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose and the synthesis of biodiesel [31, 32]. To evaluate the extracting capability and the hydrolytic ability of geniposide fromE. ulmoides bark, the ionic liquids with different methylimidazolium cations and anions were studied in this paper.Chen et al. [26] reported that the anion of ionic liquid can influence pKb value and thus influences catalytic properties. The 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium with three different anions (Im−, OAc−, and OH−), therefore, was investigated. Samples (0.5 g) were added into 10 mL different ionic liquid solutions with the same concentration of 0.2 mol/L. The mixtures were irradiated at 385 W for 10 min. As shown in Figure 2(a), different anions significantly influenced the IMSHE process. The yield of geniposidic acid treated with [C6mim]Im was 2.8
±
0.11 μmol/g which was much higher than those treated with [C6mim]OH and [C6mim]OAc. Basic imidazolide ionic liquid can hydrolyze cellulose and hemicellulose and dissolve lignin of bark. Therefore, the basic imidazolide ionic liquid not only can hydrolyze geniposide, but also can hydrolyze the cellulose and hemicellulose of cell wall. Before hydrolysis of geniposide, the cell wall was destroyed by basic imidazolide ionic liquid firstly. This could accelerate release and dissolution of geniposide, which can also improve the hydrolysis rate of geniposide efficiently. These results indicated that [C6mim]Im was more efficient than [C6mim]OAc and [C6mim]OH for hydrolyzing geniposide into geniposidic acid. Similar results were obtained in the catalyzing Knoevenagel condensation reaction [26].Figure 2
Effects of different ionic liquids (a) and their concentration (b) on the yield of geniposidic acid fromE. ulmoides bark.
(a)
(b)


### 3.1.2. Effect of the Alkyl Chain Length

Paduszyński et al. [33] reported the effect of cation functionalization on thermophysical properties of ionic liquids. To gain high conversion rate of geniposide and better yield of geniposidic acid, five ionic liquids with the same anion of Im− and different cations ([C2mim]+, [C4mim]+, [C6mim]+, [C8mim]+, and [C10mim]+) were applied to investigate the impacts of different alkyl on the properties of ionic liquid. Samples (0.5 g) were added into 10 mL different ionic liquid solutions with the same concentration of 0.2 mol/L. The mixtures were irradiated at 385 W for 10 min. Figure 2(a) showed that the yield of geniposidic acid was increased up to 2.80
±
0.11 μmol/g when alkyl changed from ethyl to hexyl. However, the yield of geniposidic acid decreased obviously from 2.80
±
0.11 to 1.35
±
0.06 μmol/g as alkyl chain length increased to decyl. According to the results of comparison experiments, the [C6mim]Im was selected as the optimal catalyst for preparing geniposidic acid in subsequent optimization studies.


### 3.1.3. Effect of Ionic Liquid Concentration

The same mass of samples as above was added into 10 mL of [C6mim]Im solution with different concentrations (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mol/L) for the purpose of studying the effects of different concentration of [C6mim]Im on the IMSHE process. The mixtures were irradiated at 385 W for 10 min. Figure2(b) presented that the yield of the geniposidic acid was changed from 2.14
±
0.11 to 2.86
±
0.14 μmol/g when the concentration of [C6mim]Im varied from 0.1 to 0.2 mol/L. The yield of geniposidic acid reached its maximum at the concentration of 0.4 mol/L. When further increasing [C6mim]Im concentration, the yield of geniposidic acid changed slightly. This may be because greater [C6mim]Im concentration leads to the greater solubility capacity and stronger alkalinity which could help to break down ester bond of geniposide to form easily carboxy group in alkali solution. Considering the above results, 0.4 mol/L [C6mim]Im was chosen as the suitable concentration for the subsequent experiments.


## 3.1.1. Effect of Anion

Previous studies have demonstrated the influence of the structure of ionic liquid on their physical and chemical characteristics [29, 30], which affect the reaction or extraction efficiency. Recently researches have reported the application of ionic liquid on the hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose and the synthesis of biodiesel [31, 32]. To evaluate the extracting capability and the hydrolytic ability of geniposide fromE. ulmoides bark, the ionic liquids with different methylimidazolium cations and anions were studied in this paper.Chen et al. [26] reported that the anion of ionic liquid can influence pKb value and thus influences catalytic properties. The 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium with three different anions (Im−, OAc−, and OH−), therefore, was investigated. Samples (0.5 g) were added into 10 mL different ionic liquid solutions with the same concentration of 0.2 mol/L. The mixtures were irradiated at 385 W for 10 min. As shown in Figure 2(a), different anions significantly influenced the IMSHE process. The yield of geniposidic acid treated with [C6mim]Im was 2.8
±
0.11 μmol/g which was much higher than those treated with [C6mim]OH and [C6mim]OAc. Basic imidazolide ionic liquid can hydrolyze cellulose and hemicellulose and dissolve lignin of bark. Therefore, the basic imidazolide ionic liquid not only can hydrolyze geniposide, but also can hydrolyze the cellulose and hemicellulose of cell wall. Before hydrolysis of geniposide, the cell wall was destroyed by basic imidazolide ionic liquid firstly. This could accelerate release and dissolution of geniposide, which can also improve the hydrolysis rate of geniposide efficiently. These results indicated that [C6mim]Im was more efficient than [C6mim]OAc and [C6mim]OH for hydrolyzing geniposide into geniposidic acid. Similar results were obtained in the catalyzing Knoevenagel condensation reaction [26].Figure 2
Effects of different ionic liquids (a) and their concentration (b) on the yield of geniposidic acid fromE. ulmoides bark.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1.2. Effect of the Alkyl Chain Length

Paduszyński et al. [33] reported the effect of cation functionalization on thermophysical properties of ionic liquids. To gain high conversion rate of geniposide and better yield of geniposidic acid, five ionic liquids with the same anion of Im− and different cations ([C2mim]+, [C4mim]+, [C6mim]+, [C8mim]+, and [C10mim]+) were applied to investigate the impacts of different alkyl on the properties of ionic liquid. Samples (0.5 g) were added into 10 mL different ionic liquid solutions with the same concentration of 0.2 mol/L. The mixtures were irradiated at 385 W for 10 min. Figure 2(a) showed that the yield of geniposidic acid was increased up to 2.80
±
0.11 μmol/g when alkyl changed from ethyl to hexyl. However, the yield of geniposidic acid decreased obviously from 2.80
±
0.11 to 1.35
±
0.06 μmol/g as alkyl chain length increased to decyl. According to the results of comparison experiments, the [C6mim]Im was selected as the optimal catalyst for preparing geniposidic acid in subsequent optimization studies.


## 3.1.3. Effect of Ionic Liquid Concentration

The same mass of samples as above was added into 10 mL of [C6mim]Im solution with different concentrations (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mol/L) for the purpose of studying the effects of different concentration of [C6mim]Im on the IMSHE process. The mixtures were irradiated at 385 W for 10 min. Figure2(b) presented that the yield of the geniposidic acid was changed from 2.14
±
0.11 to 2.86
±
0.14 μmol/g when the concentration of [C6mim]Im varied from 0.1 to 0.2 mol/L. The yield of geniposidic acid reached its maximum at the concentration of 0.4 mol/L. When further increasing [C6mim]Im concentration, the yield of geniposidic acid changed slightly. This may be because greater [C6mim]Im concentration leads to the greater solubility capacity and stronger alkalinity which could help to break down ester bond of geniposide to form easily carboxy group in alkali solution. Considering the above results, 0.4 mol/L [C6mim]Im was chosen as the suitable concentration for the subsequent experiments.


## 3.2. Optimization of the IMSHE Process by Single-Factor Tests

### 3.2.1. Effect of Microwave Power and Time

According to previous study [34], the microwave irradiation power was one of the most important factors on account of the fact that the microwave energy might influence the molecular interactions between the solvent and the targeted compounds significantly. Samples (0.5 g) were added into 10 mL of 0.4 mol/L [C6mim]Im aqueous solutions. The mixtures were irradiated at different power (120, 230, 385, 540, and 700 W) for 10 min. In the light of Figure 3(a), the yield of geniposidic acid changed obviously from 1.40
±
0.06 to 2.81
±
0.11 μmol/g when the microwave heating power changed from 120 to 385 W. But, geniposidic acid yield decreased to 2.61
±
0.10 μmol/g when further increasing the power up to 700 W. High microwave irradiation power does not result in high yield of geniposidic acid. This is maybe due to the fact that high irradiation power leads to partial carbonization of samples as internal overheating and the isomerization or degradation of geniposidic acid. This result is similar to those reported by Yao et al. [35] and Liu et al. [23]. Hence, 230–540 W was taken for BBD optimization.Figure 3
Effects of microwave irradiation power (a), microwave irradiation time (b), and liquid-solid ratio (c) on the yield of geniposidic acid.
(a)
(b)
(c)In order to choose optimal treatment time, tests were performed at 385 W for different durations (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min). In the light of Figure3(b), yield of geniposidic acid increased relatively rapidly when the treatment time varied from 5 to 10 min. The yield reached higher values of 3.01
±
0.12 μmol/g at 20 min, and then the yield of geniposidic acid changed little when further prolonging the treatment time. Thus, 10–20 min was selected for BBD optimization.


### 3.2.2. Effect of Liquid-Solid Ratio

Experiments were performed by different liquid-solid ratio. Samples (0.5 g) were added into different volume (5, 10, 12.5, 15, and 20 mL) of 0.4 mol/L [C6mim]Im solutions. The mixtures were irradiated in the microwave oven at 385 W for 10 min. Figure3(c) illustrated that the geniposidic acid yield increased significantly from 1.89
±
0.10 to 2.82
±
0.14 μmol/g when the volume of solution varied from 5 to 10 mL. When continuing to increase the liquid-solid ratio, the increase of geniposidic acid yield was not significant. In view of saving in material and solvent, a liquid-solid ratio of 15 mL/g to 25 mL/g was selected for BBD optimization.


## 3.2.1. Effect of Microwave Power and Time

According to previous study [34], the microwave irradiation power was one of the most important factors on account of the fact that the microwave energy might influence the molecular interactions between the solvent and the targeted compounds significantly. Samples (0.5 g) were added into 10 mL of 0.4 mol/L [C6mim]Im aqueous solutions. The mixtures were irradiated at different power (120, 230, 385, 540, and 700 W) for 10 min. In the light of Figure 3(a), the yield of geniposidic acid changed obviously from 1.40
±
0.06 to 2.81
±
0.11 μmol/g when the microwave heating power changed from 120 to 385 W. But, geniposidic acid yield decreased to 2.61
±
0.10 μmol/g when further increasing the power up to 700 W. High microwave irradiation power does not result in high yield of geniposidic acid. This is maybe due to the fact that high irradiation power leads to partial carbonization of samples as internal overheating and the isomerization or degradation of geniposidic acid. This result is similar to those reported by Yao et al. [35] and Liu et al. [23]. Hence, 230–540 W was taken for BBD optimization.Figure 3
Effects of microwave irradiation power (a), microwave irradiation time (b), and liquid-solid ratio (c) on the yield of geniposidic acid.
(a)
(b)
(c)In order to choose optimal treatment time, tests were performed at 385 W for different durations (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min). In the light of Figure3(b), yield of geniposidic acid increased relatively rapidly when the treatment time varied from 5 to 10 min. The yield reached higher values of 3.01
±
0.12 μmol/g at 20 min, and then the yield of geniposidic acid changed little when further prolonging the treatment time. Thus, 10–20 min was selected for BBD optimization.


## 3.2.2. Effect of Liquid-Solid Ratio

Experiments were performed by different liquid-solid ratio. Samples (0.5 g) were added into different volume (5, 10, 12.5, 15, and 20 mL) of 0.4 mol/L [C6mim]Im solutions. The mixtures were irradiated in the microwave oven at 385 W for 10 min. Figure3(c) illustrated that the geniposidic acid yield increased significantly from 1.89
±
0.10 to 2.82
±
0.14 μmol/g when the volume of solution varied from 5 to 10 mL. When continuing to increase the liquid-solid ratio, the increase of geniposidic acid yield was not significant. In view of saving in material and solvent, a liquid-solid ratio of 15 mL/g to 25 mL/g was selected for BBD optimization.


## 3.3. Optimization Parameters by BBD

According to the results of single-factor experiments, the BBD was used to further evaluate the interactions between the factors including irradiation power and time and liquid-solid ratio. Table1 illustrated that the model is significant because the F-value was 28.49. There is only a 0.01% chance that occurred because of noise. Values of “Prob > F” (X
1, X
3, X
1
X
2, X
2
X
3, X
1
2, and X
3
2) less than 0.0500 demonstrated that these factors are significant. The model terms of X
2 and X
2
2 are indistinctive because they were greater than 0.1000. The “lack of fit F-value” of 1.28 indicates that the “lack of fit” is indistinctive compared with the pure error, which is desirable. The “lack of fit F-value” of 39.42% could occur because of noise. Value of “adequacy precision” was 19.23 which was satisfactory and demonstrated that the model was better enough to navigate the design space.The three-dimensional response surface plots for the mutual effect of single factors on yield of geniposidic acid were shown in Figure4. Figure 4(a) presents the interaction of different treatment time (min) and liquid-solid ratio (mL/g) with the same power. The yield of geniposidic acid was increased significantly when prolonging the duration of microwave treatment. The yield changed gradually as the liquid-solid ratio (mL/g) varied from 15 to 25 mL/g. Figure 4(b) showed the surface plot at different treatment time (min) and power (W) with the same liquid-solid ratio. The yield of geniposidic acid changed little when prolonging the duration. However, the yield increased significantly when the irradiation power changed from 230 to 385 W and subsequently decreased dramatically when further increasing power. Figure 4(c) showed the surface plot at different irradiation power (W) and liquid-solid ratio (mL/g) with a stable treatment time. The yield significantly increased when the power varied from 230 to 385 W and then decreased obviously from 385 to 540 W. This indicated that the irradiation power is more important than liquid-solid ratio for preparation of geniposidic acid. The optimized conditions given by BBD software were as follows: 20 min of treatment time, 415 W of irradiation power, and 15 mL/g of liquid-solid ratio. Under these conditions of point prediction, the total yield was 3.5 μmol/g.Figure 4
Three-dimensional response surface plots for the effect of independent variables on yield of geniposidic acid: (a) microwave irradiation time (min) and liquid-solid ratio (mL/g); (b) microwave irradiation time (min) and microwave irradiation power (W); (c) microwave irradiation power (W) and liquid-solid ratio (mL/g).
(a)
(b)
(c)The verification tests were performed three times under these optimized conditions given by BBD software (20 min of treatment time, 415 W of irradiation power, and 15 mL/g of liquid-solid ratio). The actual yield reached3.41
±
0.17 μmol/g.


## 3.4. Preliminary Separation of Geniposidic Acid Using Macroporous Resin

The adsorption capacity and desorption ratio of geniposidic acid on the eight types of resins are depicted in Table2. In the light of Table 2, the adsorption capacity of geniposidic acid on DM130 and HPD400A macroporous resin was higher than those of other resins. But the desorption ratio of geniposidic acid on DM130 was significantly higher than that of HPD400A (P
<
0.05), which could be attributed to their similarity to the polarity of geniposidic acid. The adsorption capacity of macroporous resins is related to the polarity and the chemical features of the adsorbed substance. Macroporous resins with middle polarity exhibited stronger adsorption abilities to polar substances. The selection of proper macroporous resins should be in accordance with the resins polarities, adsorption capacity, and desorption ratios. The middle-polar macroporous resin DM130 has shown better adsorption capacity and desorption ratio because of its similar polarity with the polar substance geniposidic acid. Hence, DM130 resin was selected to separate the geniposidic acid from the hydrolysate of geniposide.


## 3.5. General Morphology Changes after Treatment with Different Processes

To explain the structural alteration and the mechanism of hydrolysis and extraction during the IMSHE processes, the plant materials with different treatment were analyzed by SEM and TG.


### 3.5.1. SEM Analysis of Materials

To observe the surface morphology, samples obtained by different processes were determined by SEM. Figure5 showed the surface morphology ofE. ulmoides bark without treatment (a) and after degreasing (b), microwave-assisted water treatment (c), and IMSHE treatment (d), respectively. It can be seen that different extraction procedures produce distinguishable surface morphology changes. The morphological structures represent ordered tracheary cells of the xylem and the surface of the raw material covered with amount of curved filaments (Figure 5(a)). It can be seen that there are few of curved filaments on the surface of degreased material (Figure 5(b)). Compared to raw material, the surface of cells in degreasing sample was almost not changed. After microwave-assisted water treatment (Figure 5(c)), the cell walls had a partial destruction or no destruction leading to some of active substances being still in plant cells. As expected, the plant cell walls were partly destroyed by IMSHE treatment; the cell walls became thinner and disorganised (Figure 5(d)), which resulted in the release of geniposide. This made the hydrolyzing of geniposide easier.Figure 5
The SEM micrographs of raw material (a), degreased material (b), microwave-assisted water treatment material (c), and IMSHE treatment (d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.5.2. TG Analysis of Materials

In this part, the thermogravimetric degradation curves of theE. ulmoides bark processed were given in Figure 6. The profile of the TG showed a weight loss between 50 and 800°C. As shown in Figure 6(a, b, and c), raw material, degreased material, and microwave-assisted water treatment material lost more weight than that after IMSHE treatment (Figure 6(d)). It was further indicated that IMSHE is an efficient preparation method for geniposidic acid.Figure 6
Thermogravimetric degradation curves of raw material (a), degreased material (b), microwave-assisted water treatment material (c), and IMSHE treatment (d).


## 3.5.1. SEM Analysis of Materials

To observe the surface morphology, samples obtained by different processes were determined by SEM. Figure5 showed the surface morphology ofE. ulmoides bark without treatment (a) and after degreasing (b), microwave-assisted water treatment (c), and IMSHE treatment (d), respectively. It can be seen that different extraction procedures produce distinguishable surface morphology changes. The morphological structures represent ordered tracheary cells of the xylem and the surface of the raw material covered with amount of curved filaments (Figure 5(a)). It can be seen that there are few of curved filaments on the surface of degreased material (Figure 5(b)). Compared to raw material, the surface of cells in degreasing sample was almost not changed. After microwave-assisted water treatment (Figure 5(c)), the cell walls had a partial destruction or no destruction leading to some of active substances being still in plant cells. As expected, the plant cell walls were partly destroyed by IMSHE treatment; the cell walls became thinner and disorganised (Figure 5(d)), which resulted in the release of geniposide. This made the hydrolyzing of geniposide easier.Figure 5
The SEM micrographs of raw material (a), degreased material (b), microwave-assisted water treatment material (c), and IMSHE treatment (d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.5.2. TG Analysis of Materials

In this part, the thermogravimetric degradation curves of theE. ulmoides bark processed were given in Figure 6. The profile of the TG showed a weight loss between 50 and 800°C. As shown in Figure 6(a, b, and c), raw material, degreased material, and microwave-assisted water treatment material lost more weight than that after IMSHE treatment (Figure 6(d)). It was further indicated that IMSHE is an efficient preparation method for geniposidic acid.Figure 6
Thermogravimetric degradation curves of raw material (a), degreased material (b), microwave-assisted water treatment material (c), and IMSHE treatment (d).


## 3.6. Preliminary Estimation of Cost, Energy, and Environment Ecology

Recently, low cost and energy consumption, high efficiency, and environmentally-friendly method are clearly advantageous for the preparation of the bioactive compounds from plant material. It can be seen from Table3 that the electric consumption of IMSHE and MSHE is only 0.14 kWh which is much lower than those of IHRSHE and HRSHE (0.90 kWh). With the similar geniposidic acid yield, IHRSHE and HRSHE required a more tedious duration (120 min) and higher power (450 W) compared with IMSHE and MSHE (20 min; 415 W). The yield of geniposidic acid per kilowatt hour for IMSHE is 24.36
±
1.22 μmol/g·kWh, which is obviously higher than those of MSHE (2.97
±
0.12 μmol/g·kWh), IHRSHE (3.02
±
0.11 μmol/g·kWh), and HRSHE (2.82
±
0.14 μmol/g·kWh). Additionally, imidazolide basic ionic liquid is efficient for hydrolyzing geniposide compared to NaOH. According to the literatures reported by Ma et al. [36] and Liu et al. [23], to produce 1 kWh by combustion of fossil fuel (coal or fuel), it will reject 800 g of CO2 into the atmosphere. Therefore, 720.00 g of CO2 will be emitted into the atmosphere in the process of IHRSHE and HRSHE, which is 6.4-fold of those of IMSHE and MSHE (112.00 g CO2). This result demonstrated that this is an environmentally-friendly technique for producing bioactive compounds.Table 3
Comparison of economic effect and environmental impact with different methods, mean ± SD (n
=
3).
IMSHE
MSHE
IHRSHE
HRSHE
Solvent
[C6mim]Im
NaOH
[C6mim]Im
NaOH
Electric power (W)
415
450
Electric consumption time (min)
20
120
Electric consumption (kWh)
0.14
0.90
Environmental impact (CO2 emission load, g)
112.00
720.00
Yield of geniposidic acid (μmol/g)
3.41
±
0.17
2.97
±
0.12
3.02
±
0.11
2.82
±
0.14
Yield of geniposidic acid per kilowatt hour (μmol/g⋅kWh)
24.36
±
1.22
20.77
±
1.04
3.36
±
0.168
3.13
±
0.16


## 4. Conclusions

In the present research, imidazolide basic ionic liquid-based microwave-assisted simultaneous hydrolysis and extraction method was specially designed and first applied for preparation of geniposidic acid fromE. ulmoides bark. After a series of experiments, 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium imidazolium salt ([C6mim]Im) was chosen as the optimal basic ionic liquid. According to the results of single-factor optimization tests, the operational conditions of this novel method were optimized by the BBD. After hydrolysis of geniposide, geniposidic acid is separated by DM130 macroporous resin. For IMSHE, the yield of geniposidic acid reached 3.41
±
0.17 μmol/g within 20 min, and for IHRSHE the yield of geniposidic acid was only 3.02
±
0.11 μmol/g within 120 min. Additionally, SEM and TG result illustrated that the proposed technique in this paper could destroy plant cell walls efficiently which significantly increased the release of active substance. Thus, this is a novel technique for preparation of geniposidic acid fromE. ulmoides bark.



---

*Source: 2135350-2016-04-18.xml*