# Investigation of Mechanical Properties ofSansevieria cylindrica Fiber/Polyester Composites

Authors: Balasubramani Subramaniam; Manickavasagam V. M; Paul Theophilus Rajakumar I; P.Anantha Christu Raj; Bharath V G; J. Madhusudhanan; Amit Kumar Sharma; Pravin Patil; Gizachew Balcha Assefa
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Natural fiber-reinforced composites are the most cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative to industrial applications. Composite materials reinforced withSansevieria cylindrica (SC) fibers were developed in this research work. These fibers were chosen for their outstanding mechanical qualities. Compression moulding was used to create composite materials. Each leaf on a Sansevieria cylindrica plant is 20 to 30 mm thick, with a height of 1000 to 2000 mm. The Sansevieria cylindrica (SC) fibers were used as chemically treated fibers and untreated fibers to produce the composites. The tensile strength, hardness, and impact strength of various fiber weight% of composites (20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) were calculated. From the tested results, the maximum tensile strength achieved in 40 wt% of treated SC fiber composites is 85.7 MPa. The maximum hardness is found in 40 wt% of composites in both treated and untreated fiber composites. The 40 wt% of composites gives a better impact energy of 9.4 J/cm2.The SC fiber polyester composites have superior interfacial bonding and give maximal strength in treated SC fiber composites. The fiber treatment delivers greater strength than the untreated fiber, according to this study. The treated SC fibers have better strength and good bonding between the fiber and matrix to produce the composite materials.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Composite materials play an essential part in the industries as a replacement for traditional materials. The current research focuses on the creation of newer, better, and more cost-effective composites. The usage of synthetic materials in composites may have an impact on the environment and cause other problems. To solve these issues, natural components such as fibers are employed in polymer composites. Natural fiber’s widespread availability has prompted researchers to produce natural fiber-reinforced composites. The efficient use of resources such as natural materials and their products is essential for global development. The reinforcing materials in composites provide the main load-carrying part, providing excellent quality and solidity as well as protection from twisting and breaking under the linked load. Composite material exhibits a blend of the greatest features of each particular material. The continuous phase is formed by the matrix material, whereas the dispersed phase is formed by the reinforcements [1–5].All of the major sectors, including automobiles, aircraft, home appliances, and aeronautical, are currently using composite materials. The composite material was chosen because it has higher mechanical qualities, corrosion resistance, and a pleasing look, is easy to manufacture, and has a longer life span. The unsaturated polyester resin is a low-cost thermoset material that is commonly utilised due to its good processability and cross-linking tendency, as well as its good mechanical qualities. Polyester resin is an aesthetically pleasing material that may be used to make composite products at a low cost. This matrix material is mostly preferred over advanced technical applications due to the superiority of polymer mixed material, which is easy to make and at a reasonable cost [6–10].Hornsby et al. investigated the microstructure and mechanical properties of flax and wheat straw fiber-filled polypropylene composites. The flax fiber has stronger interfacial adhesion with the resin, resulting in higher tensile yield strength and Charpy toughness. Furthermore, the results demonstrated that strengthening the interfacial adhesion between the fiber and resin by chemically treating the fiber with 5 wt percent maleic anhydride boosted the strength [3].Luo and Netravali investigated the mechanical properties, such as tensile and flexural properties, of pineapple fiber-reinforced composites. The authors concluded that composites’ tensile and flexural strengths are significantly better in the longitudinal direction than in the transverse direction based on the findings. Fiber pull out has been identified as a result of poor fiber-matrix interfacial bonding caused by fiber fibrillation. The authors also discovered that nonisothermal crystallisation kinetics, crystallinity, and thermal degradation of the resin have no effect on pineapple fibers [4, 11].Sreenivasan et al. studied the mechanical characteristics of composite plates which were determined with various fiber aspect ratios and weight fractions. Mechanical qualities such as tensile, flexural, and impact properties increased as fiber length grew, but further increasing the fiber length resulted in a restriction in properties. The findings demonstrated that the strength values of composites increase in a predictable pattern, with the property increasing as the weight percentage of the fiber increases and subsequently decreasing as the fiber weight% increases [12].Sathishkumar et al. investigated the composite materials made with snake grass fibers which are one such capable material that may be used to replace traditional and synthetic materials in practical applications. The volume fraction enhances the tensile and flexural strengths and modulus of the snake grass fiber-reinforced composite, according to the testing results [5].Rajesh et al. carried out chemical treatments with a 10% NaOH solution and H2O2. The tensile strength of treated fiber-reinforced polymer composites was higher than that of untreated fiber-reinforced composites. The treated fiber has a 17% higher flexural strength than plain polylactic acid matrix composites. Untreated sisal/polylactic acid matrix composites showed much higher thermal deterioration than treated fiber-reinforced composites [6]. Venkatesha Gupta et al. investigated the mechanical characteristics of sisal/hemp fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. The fibers were treated as 10% sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Compression moulding was used to create fiber-reinforced composites in accordance with ASTM specifications. The mechanical properties are improved due to the chemical treatment of the fiber [13].Many studies reported the mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced polymer composites. They improve the mechanical properties with the addition of reinforcements with the proper length of the fiber and volume of the fiber [14, 15]. The manufacturing of low-cost polymer composites is fabricated with the Sansevieria cylindrica (SC) fibers as the reinforcement and polyester resin as matrix material to produce the composites. The chemical treatment of fiber composites produces better properties than untreated ones. Very few literature studies report the mechanical properties of Sansevieria cylindrica fibers reinforced with polyester composites. This research work studied the mechanical properties of SC fiber-reinforced composites and also compared them with the usage of fibers that were chemically treated and untreated. The chemically treated fibers with the optimum level of fiber volume and length provide better strength compared with the other percentages of volume.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials Used

Chopped 30 mmSansevieria cylindrica fibers were used as a reinforcement to produce the composites. The 30 mm length of Sansevieria cylindrica fibers provides better strength compared with the other lengths of the fiber. The optimum length of the fiber is selected to produce the composites [8]. The matrix material used is unsaturated polyester resin to fabricate the composite. Methyl ethyl ketone is used as curing catalyst, and naphthenate is used as accelerator.


### 2.2. Fiber Production Process

The SC plant was beaten with a hammer and dried in the sun for one day to remove the moisture content. The method begins with hammering to remove the fleshy layer, after which the individual fibers are retrieved by hand and shown in Figure1. The SC fiber is 2.07 ∗ 10^5 m thick, and density is 0.9 g/cm3 [8].Figure 1
Sansevieria cylindrica (SC) fiber.


### 2.3. Fiber Surface Treatment

The NaOH treatment caused hemicellulose in the cellulosic fiber to swell even more, and other contaminants were eliminated from the fiber surface. Because of the NaOH treatment, the cellulose microfibrils remain unaltered. Surface contaminants are removed in order to improve mechanical qualities, fiber wetting characteristics, and fiber-matrix surface bonding in composite applications [8].The chemical properties of SC fiber values are tabulated in Table 1.Table 1
Chemical properties of theSansevieria cylindrica fiber.
Fiber categoryCellulose (%)Hemicellulose (%)Lignin (%)Wax (%)Moisture (%)Raw fiber79.710.133.180.096.0610% NaoH treated82.66.953.980.078.03


### 2.4. Preparation of Composites

Composites were made using the compression moulding technique. The chemically treated SC fibers were used for the preparation of composites.The composites were randomly distributed with varying weight percentages (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) of the SC fiber. A great effort was taken to ensure that the fibers were distributed evenly. Hydraulic compression was used to apply a force to prepare the composites. The mould box size was300∗300∗3mm, and the material of the mould was EN8 steel. The polyester resin was mixed with 0.5% cobalt naphthenate and 2% methyl ethyl ketone peroxide. Before pouring, the matrix solution was degassed. The matrix solution was applied using a brush, and air bubbles were removed in the sheet. Hydraulic pressure was applied to the mould at the period of 24 hours. The composites were made in the shape of a flat plate measuring 300∗300∗3mm, and they are shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites.


## 2.1. Materials Used

Chopped 30 mmSansevieria cylindrica fibers were used as a reinforcement to produce the composites. The 30 mm length of Sansevieria cylindrica fibers provides better strength compared with the other lengths of the fiber. The optimum length of the fiber is selected to produce the composites [8]. The matrix material used is unsaturated polyester resin to fabricate the composite. Methyl ethyl ketone is used as curing catalyst, and naphthenate is used as accelerator.


## 2.2. Fiber Production Process

The SC plant was beaten with a hammer and dried in the sun for one day to remove the moisture content. The method begins with hammering to remove the fleshy layer, after which the individual fibers are retrieved by hand and shown in Figure1. The SC fiber is 2.07 ∗ 10^5 m thick, and density is 0.9 g/cm3 [8].Figure 1
Sansevieria cylindrica (SC) fiber.


## 2.3. Fiber Surface Treatment

The NaOH treatment caused hemicellulose in the cellulosic fiber to swell even more, and other contaminants were eliminated from the fiber surface. Because of the NaOH treatment, the cellulose microfibrils remain unaltered. Surface contaminants are removed in order to improve mechanical qualities, fiber wetting characteristics, and fiber-matrix surface bonding in composite applications [8].The chemical properties of SC fiber values are tabulated in Table 1.Table 1
Chemical properties of theSansevieria cylindrica fiber.
Fiber categoryCellulose (%)Hemicellulose (%)Lignin (%)Wax (%)Moisture (%)Raw fiber79.710.133.180.096.0610% NaoH treated82.66.953.980.078.03


## 2.4. Preparation of Composites

Composites were made using the compression moulding technique. The chemically treated SC fibers were used for the preparation of composites.The composites were randomly distributed with varying weight percentages (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) of the SC fiber. A great effort was taken to ensure that the fibers were distributed evenly. Hydraulic compression was used to apply a force to prepare the composites. The mould box size was300∗300∗3mm, and the material of the mould was EN8 steel. The polyester resin was mixed with 0.5% cobalt naphthenate and 2% methyl ethyl ketone peroxide. Before pouring, the matrix solution was degassed. The matrix solution was applied using a brush, and air bubbles were removed in the sheet. Hydraulic pressure was applied to the mould at the period of 24 hours. The composites were made in the shape of a flat plate measuring 300∗300∗3mm, and they are shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Mechanical Properties

The composites were cut for the tensile test in accordance with ASTM guidelines. The tensile test was conducted using the ASTM D638 method, and testing is carried out by applying tensile load on both ends. Each test carries with three samples, and average values are noted. The ASTM D256 procedure specifies the use of Izod impact testing equipment to accomplish the impact test. Each test carries with three samples, and average values are noted. The hardness was determined using Rockwell hardness testing equipment in accordance with ASTM D785 standards. The test was conducted in five places of each sample, and average values were noted [16, 17].


### 3.2. Tensile Test

The influence of fiber treatments on the tensile characteristics of short SC fiber composites is shown in Figure3. The tensile strength of 35.5 MPa was obtained from the pure polyester resin plate.The tensile strength of treated and untreated SC fiber composites is tabulated in Table2. The tensile strength of the SC fiber composite has been raised to 85.7 MPa due to the addition of treated SC fiber to the polyester matrix. The tensile strength of treated and untreated SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites against the varying wt% is plotted and shown in Figure 3. The tensile strength of treated SC fiber composites has given the higher strength. The 40 wt% of composites had the highest tensile strength among the treated SC fiber composites, indicating a robust interfacial bond between the SC fiber and polyester matrix. The wax, hemicelluloses, and pectin concentrations in the surface of plant fibers hindered the wetting of the fiber with the matrix [18]. The tensile load was applied to the composites, the major failure of the specimen was fiber pull out, and due to this, the voids were created. The fracture occurs in the fiber and matrix in the composites [19].Table 2
Tensile strength of treated and untreated SC fiber composites.
Sample nameWt% of the SC fiberUltimate tensile strength (MPa)Elongation (%)Untreated SC fiber compositesTreated SC fiber composites1Pure polyester resin35.51.821038.745.87.232050.353.37.443062.867.47.554074.585.77.465066.372.67.3Figure 3
Tensile strength of treated and untreated SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites.


### 3.3. Hardness

When a load is applied to a sample, its hardness refers to the resistance has its shape permanently changed. When a composite material is subjected to a sudden impact, it indicates the composite’s ability to resist crack propagation. The composite material hardness is based on the distribution of the fiber into the matrix [20]. The hardness values of treated and untreated SC fiber composites are tabulated in Table 3. The hardness of treated SC fiber composites has given the higher value. The hardness values of treated and untreated SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites against the varying wt% are plotted and shown in Figure 4. The 40 wt% of composites had the highest hardness among the treated SC fiber composites. It indicates that the distribution of the fiber into the matrix minimizes the voids and also better interfacial bond between the SC fiber and matrix [21].Table 3
Hardness values of treated and untreated SC fiber composites.
Sample nameWt% of the SC fiberHardness (Rockwell)Untreated SC fiber compositesTreated SC fiber composites1Pure polyester resin6521075783207883430838954086926507886Figure 4
Hardness of treated and untreated SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites.


### 3.4. Impact Test

The ability of the material which withstand high speed stress is called as impact resistance [22]. The impact strength values of treated and untreated SC fiber composites are tabulated in Table 4.Table 4
Impact strength of treated and untreated SC fiber composites.
Sample nameWt% of the SC fiberImpact strength (J/cm2)Untreated SC fiber compositesTreated SC fiber composites1Pure polyester resin0.62104.74.93205.35.64306.87.45408.59.46508.38.6The impact strength is determined as the ability to absorb energy of the metal. The impact energy of 0.4 J/cm2 was obtained from the pure polyester resin plate. As a result, 40 wt% of composites gives better impact strength than other composites. The impact strength of treated and untreated SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites against the varying wt% is plotted and shown in Figure 5. The 40 wt% of composites is capable of absorbing a greater amount of energy to inhibit fracture development [19]. The material has inadequate interfacial bonding which causes microspaces between the filler and the matrix, making crack propagation simple. Under impact load, microcracks cause crack propagation [23].Figure 5
Impact strength of treated and untreated SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites.


## 3.1. Mechanical Properties

The composites were cut for the tensile test in accordance with ASTM guidelines. The tensile test was conducted using the ASTM D638 method, and testing is carried out by applying tensile load on both ends. Each test carries with three samples, and average values are noted. The ASTM D256 procedure specifies the use of Izod impact testing equipment to accomplish the impact test. Each test carries with three samples, and average values are noted. The hardness was determined using Rockwell hardness testing equipment in accordance with ASTM D785 standards. The test was conducted in five places of each sample, and average values were noted [16, 17].


## 3.2. Tensile Test

The influence of fiber treatments on the tensile characteristics of short SC fiber composites is shown in Figure3. The tensile strength of 35.5 MPa was obtained from the pure polyester resin plate.The tensile strength of treated and untreated SC fiber composites is tabulated in Table2. The tensile strength of the SC fiber composite has been raised to 85.7 MPa due to the addition of treated SC fiber to the polyester matrix. The tensile strength of treated and untreated SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites against the varying wt% is plotted and shown in Figure 3. The tensile strength of treated SC fiber composites has given the higher strength. The 40 wt% of composites had the highest tensile strength among the treated SC fiber composites, indicating a robust interfacial bond between the SC fiber and polyester matrix. The wax, hemicelluloses, and pectin concentrations in the surface of plant fibers hindered the wetting of the fiber with the matrix [18]. The tensile load was applied to the composites, the major failure of the specimen was fiber pull out, and due to this, the voids were created. The fracture occurs in the fiber and matrix in the composites [19].Table 2
Tensile strength of treated and untreated SC fiber composites.
Sample nameWt% of the SC fiberUltimate tensile strength (MPa)Elongation (%)Untreated SC fiber compositesTreated SC fiber composites1Pure polyester resin35.51.821038.745.87.232050.353.37.443062.867.47.554074.585.77.465066.372.67.3Figure 3
Tensile strength of treated and untreated SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites.


## 3.3. Hardness

When a load is applied to a sample, its hardness refers to the resistance has its shape permanently changed. When a composite material is subjected to a sudden impact, it indicates the composite’s ability to resist crack propagation. The composite material hardness is based on the distribution of the fiber into the matrix [20]. The hardness values of treated and untreated SC fiber composites are tabulated in Table 3. The hardness of treated SC fiber composites has given the higher value. The hardness values of treated and untreated SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites against the varying wt% are plotted and shown in Figure 4. The 40 wt% of composites had the highest hardness among the treated SC fiber composites. It indicates that the distribution of the fiber into the matrix minimizes the voids and also better interfacial bond between the SC fiber and matrix [21].Table 3
Hardness values of treated and untreated SC fiber composites.
Sample nameWt% of the SC fiberHardness (Rockwell)Untreated SC fiber compositesTreated SC fiber composites1Pure polyester resin6521075783207883430838954086926507886Figure 4
Hardness of treated and untreated SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites.


## 3.4. Impact Test

The ability of the material which withstand high speed stress is called as impact resistance [22]. The impact strength values of treated and untreated SC fiber composites are tabulated in Table 4.Table 4
Impact strength of treated and untreated SC fiber composites.
Sample nameWt% of the SC fiberImpact strength (J/cm2)Untreated SC fiber compositesTreated SC fiber composites1Pure polyester resin0.62104.74.93205.35.64306.87.45408.59.46508.38.6The impact strength is determined as the ability to absorb energy of the metal. The impact energy of 0.4 J/cm2 was obtained from the pure polyester resin plate. As a result, 40 wt% of composites gives better impact strength than other composites. The impact strength of treated and untreated SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites against the varying wt% is plotted and shown in Figure 5. The 40 wt% of composites is capable of absorbing a greater amount of energy to inhibit fracture development [19]. The material has inadequate interfacial bonding which causes microspaces between the filler and the matrix, making crack propagation simple. Under impact load, microcracks cause crack propagation [23].Figure 5
Impact strength of treated and untreated SC fiber-reinforced polyester composites.


## 4. Conclusions

The polymer composites with treated SC fiber and untreated SC fiber composites have been prepared with the compression moulding technique. The mechanical properties of treated SC fiber composites and untreated SC fiber composites with varying wt% of composites are evaluated. The major results are as follows. The maximum tensile strength achieved in 40 wt% of treated SC fiber composites is 85.7 MPa. Further addition of the fiber reduces the strength of composites. The 40 wt% of composites gives the maximum hardness in both treated and untreated fiber composites. The 40 wt% of composites gives a better impact energy of 9.4 J/cm2. Further addition of composites reduces the strength of composites due to micropores and crack initiation of composites. The mechanical properties of SC fiber polyester composites have better interfacial bonding and provide the maximum strength in the treated SC fiber composites. The tensile strength, hardness, and impact energy of treated SC fiber composites showed the maximum value when compared to untreated fiber composites. From this research, it reveals that the fiber treatment provides better strength than the untreated one. The treated SC fibers have better strength and good bonding between the fiber and matrix to produce the composite materials. The 40 wt% of fiber composites has better properties than other composites.



---

*Source: 2180614-2022-02-28.xml*