# Validation of a UV Spectrometric Method for the Assay of Tolfenamic Acid in Organic Solvents

Authors: Sofia Ahmed; Nafeesa Mustaan; Muhammad Ali Sheraz; Syeda Ayesha Ahmed un Nabi; Iqbal Ahmad
Journal: Journal of Pharmaceutics
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

The present study has been carried out to validate a UV spectrometric method for the assay of tolfenamic acid (TA) in organic solvents. TA is insoluble in water; therefore, a total of thirteen commonly used organic solvents have been selected in which the drug is soluble. Fresh stock solutions of TA in each solvent in a concentration of 1 × 10−4M (2.62 mg%) were prepared for the assay. The method has been validated according to the guideline of International Conference on Harmonization and parameters like linearity, range, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and robustness have been studied. Although the method was found to be efficient for the determination of TA in all solvents on the basis of statistical data 1-octanol, followed by ethanol and methanol, was found to be comparatively better than the other studied solvents. No change in the stock solution stability of TA has been observed in each solvent for 24 hours stored either at room (25
±
1°C) or at refrigerated temperature (2–8°C). A shift in the absorption maxima has been observed for TA in various solvents indicating drug-solvent interactions. The studied method is simple, rapid, economical, accurate, and precise for the assay of TA in different organic solvents.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Tolfenamic acid (TA) is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that belongs to the family of fenamates and is used in both humans and animals for the management of pain and inflammation [1]. Recently, it has gained tremendous popularity due to its anticancer activity against a variety of cancers [2–7]. TA has also shown potential for use in slowing down the progression of Alzheimer’s disease [8–11]. A number of workers have employed various techniques to determine TA in different samples, for example, solutions, milk, serum, blood, and urine [12–22], or to characterize its physicochemical properties [23–28], but still the literature lacks information regarding its analysis in different solvents using a validated method.TA occurs as a white or slightly yellow crystalline powder and is practically insoluble in water [29, 30]. The official pharmacopoeial assay method for TA involves direct titration against sodium hydroxide solution [29]. Previously, validated methods for the quantitative analysis of TA, both as a pure compound and in tablet dosage form, have been reported using FTIR and UV spectrometry [31]. Both methods showed good accuracy and precision for the assay of TA with the UV method showing comparatively better results. Both techniques were found to be statistically comparable with the official titrimetric method [31].The present study has been designed to validate the UV spectrometric assay procedure for the analysis of pure TA in different organic solvents according to the guidelines of International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) [32]. TA is a water insoluble drug and such study would provide useful data which would help in its determination with high accuracy and precision in various pharmaceutical systems incorporating organic solvents.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Tolfenamic acid was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd., Dorset, UK. All the solvents used in this study were of analytical grade having the highest degree of purity. The details of the solvents used in this study are reported in Table1.Table 1
List of solvents used for the validation of TA assay in the order of decreasing polarity.
S. number
Name
Purity (%)
Supplier
Dielectric constanta
(1)
Acetonitrile
99.9%
VWR
36.64
(2)
Methanol
99.8%
Merck
33.00
(3)
Ethanol
99.8%
BDH
25.30
(4)
Acetone
99.0%
Merck
21.01
(5)
1-Propanol
99.5%
Merck
20.80
(6)
1-Butanol
>99.0%
Merck
17.84
(7)
1-Hexanol
98.0%
Scharlau
13.03
(8)
Benzyl alcohol
>99.0%
Scharlau
11.92
(9)
1-Octanol
99.5%
Merck
10.30
(10)
Dichloromethane
99.8%
Lab-Scan
8.93
(11)
Ethyl acetate
99.0%
Merck
6.08
(12)
Chloroform
99.5%
Merck
4.81
(13)
Toluene
99.5%
Tedia
2.38
a[33].


### 2.2. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC)

TLC was performed to check the purity of TA used in this study according to the method reported in British Pharmacopoeia [29]. The substance (25 mg) was dissolved in a mixture of methanol and methylene chloride (1 : 3, v/v) and diluted to 10 mL with the same mixture and 10 μL of the solution was applied to 250 μm silica gel GF254 plates. It was developed with the mobile phase up to 2/3 distance of the plate. The plate was dried and viewed under 254 nm UV lamp (Uvitec, Cambridge, UK).


### 2.3. Ultraviolet Spectrometry

All absorbance measurements and spectral determinations were carried out on a Shimadzu UV-visible spectrophotometer (model UV-1601) using quartz cell of 10 mm path length. The cells were employed always in the same orientation using appropriate control solutions in the reference beam. The baseline correction was made by the built-in baseline memory at the initializing period while auto-zero adjustment was made by one-touch operation. The wavelength scale was also calibrated automatically by the instrument. The instrument was calibrated for the absorbance scale according to the method described in British Pharmacopoeia [29], by using 0.057–0.063 g/lit of potassium dichromate in 0.005 M sulfuric acid.The absorbencies of the corresponding series of solutions in each solvent were measured against a reference of the same solvent in the region of 250–400 nm. Quartz cells were closed with a cap to prevent evaporation of the organic solvent during absorbance measurements.


### 2.4. Preparation of Stock and Test Solutions for Validation Studies

The stock solutions of TA for validation studies were prepared in a concentration of 1.0 × 10−4M (2.62 mg%) in the individual solvent (Table 1). The stock solutions were thoroughly stirred each time by the aid of a magnetic stirrer for 30 min. During stirring the solutions were kept in a tightly closed container to avoid evaporation of the organic solvent. The test solutions in each solvent were prepared from the stock by making appropriate dilutions in the concentration range of 1.0–8.0 × 10−5M. The stock solutions and the respective dilutions were found to be completely transparent in appearance. Each time fresh solutions were prepared. The solutions were protected from light and the absorbance was then measured immediately. All experiments were performed in triplicate.


### 2.5. Validation of the Analytical Method

The UV method for the assay of TA was validated according to the guidelines of ICH [32]. Different parameters of validation for TA were studied which are described as follows.


#### 2.5.1. Linearity and Range

The linearity of the method was determined by preparing calibration curves of absorbance versus the concentration of TA of the test solutions in the concentration range of 1.0–8.0 × 10−5M for each solvent. The linearity was statistically determined by regression analysis of five concentrations used in triplicate. The linearity range was selected on the basis of absorbance values in the region of around 0.2–0.8. This range of absorbance is known to provide values with the highest precision [34]. The molar absorptivity and A (1%, 1 cm) values were also determined from the calibration curve.


#### 2.5.2. Accuracy

The accuracy of the proposed method was determined by adding known concentrations of the drug in the solutions followed by their analysis by the UV spectrometric method. Three different concentrations in triplicate from the studied range were selected and analyzed for the recovery.


#### 2.5.3. Precision

The precision of the developed method was calculated by performing nine determinations at three concentrations covering the specified range. The precision was determined by calculating relative standard deviation (%RSD) of the mean recoveries.


#### 2.5.4. Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ)

LOD and LOQ of the developed method were calculated from the standard deviation of they-intercept and slope of the calibration curve using the following formulae:(1)
L
O
D
=
3.3
×
σ
S
,
L
O
Q
=
10
×
σ
S
,where σ is the standard deviation of the intercept and S is the slope of the calibration curve.


#### 2.5.5. Robustness

The robustness of the method was determined by studying small changes in the assay wavelength (±2 nm). This parameter was studied thrice in the similar range used for the determination of TA (i.e., 1.0–8.0 × 10−5M). The accuracy and precision of the method were determined.


#### 2.5.6. Solution Stability

The stability of stock solutions of TA was studied at room (25
±
1°C) and refrigerated temperature (2–8°C). The stock solutions of TA were prepared in pure solvents at a concentration of 1 × 10−4M (2.62 mg%). The samples were stored in tightly sealed glass containers protected from light. A 5 mL aliquot of the sample was taken each time and the absorbencies were measured at 0-, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 24-hour time interval.


## 2.1. Materials

Tolfenamic acid was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd., Dorset, UK. All the solvents used in this study were of analytical grade having the highest degree of purity. The details of the solvents used in this study are reported in Table1.Table 1
List of solvents used for the validation of TA assay in the order of decreasing polarity.
S. number
Name
Purity (%)
Supplier
Dielectric constanta
(1)
Acetonitrile
99.9%
VWR
36.64
(2)
Methanol
99.8%
Merck
33.00
(3)
Ethanol
99.8%
BDH
25.30
(4)
Acetone
99.0%
Merck
21.01
(5)
1-Propanol
99.5%
Merck
20.80
(6)
1-Butanol
>99.0%
Merck
17.84
(7)
1-Hexanol
98.0%
Scharlau
13.03
(8)
Benzyl alcohol
>99.0%
Scharlau
11.92
(9)
1-Octanol
99.5%
Merck
10.30
(10)
Dichloromethane
99.8%
Lab-Scan
8.93
(11)
Ethyl acetate
99.0%
Merck
6.08
(12)
Chloroform
99.5%
Merck
4.81
(13)
Toluene
99.5%
Tedia
2.38
a[33].


## 2.2. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC)

TLC was performed to check the purity of TA used in this study according to the method reported in British Pharmacopoeia [29]. The substance (25 mg) was dissolved in a mixture of methanol and methylene chloride (1 : 3, v/v) and diluted to 10 mL with the same mixture and 10 μL of the solution was applied to 250 μm silica gel GF254 plates. It was developed with the mobile phase up to 2/3 distance of the plate. The plate was dried and viewed under 254 nm UV lamp (Uvitec, Cambridge, UK).


## 2.3. Ultraviolet Spectrometry

All absorbance measurements and spectral determinations were carried out on a Shimadzu UV-visible spectrophotometer (model UV-1601) using quartz cell of 10 mm path length. The cells were employed always in the same orientation using appropriate control solutions in the reference beam. The baseline correction was made by the built-in baseline memory at the initializing period while auto-zero adjustment was made by one-touch operation. The wavelength scale was also calibrated automatically by the instrument. The instrument was calibrated for the absorbance scale according to the method described in British Pharmacopoeia [29], by using 0.057–0.063 g/lit of potassium dichromate in 0.005 M sulfuric acid.The absorbencies of the corresponding series of solutions in each solvent were measured against a reference of the same solvent in the region of 250–400 nm. Quartz cells were closed with a cap to prevent evaporation of the organic solvent during absorbance measurements.


## 2.4. Preparation of Stock and Test Solutions for Validation Studies

The stock solutions of TA for validation studies were prepared in a concentration of 1.0 × 10−4M (2.62 mg%) in the individual solvent (Table 1). The stock solutions were thoroughly stirred each time by the aid of a magnetic stirrer for 30 min. During stirring the solutions were kept in a tightly closed container to avoid evaporation of the organic solvent. The test solutions in each solvent were prepared from the stock by making appropriate dilutions in the concentration range of 1.0–8.0 × 10−5M. The stock solutions and the respective dilutions were found to be completely transparent in appearance. Each time fresh solutions were prepared. The solutions were protected from light and the absorbance was then measured immediately. All experiments were performed in triplicate.


## 2.5. Validation of the Analytical Method

The UV method for the assay of TA was validated according to the guidelines of ICH [32]. Different parameters of validation for TA were studied which are described as follows.


### 2.5.1. Linearity and Range

The linearity of the method was determined by preparing calibration curves of absorbance versus the concentration of TA of the test solutions in the concentration range of 1.0–8.0 × 10−5M for each solvent. The linearity was statistically determined by regression analysis of five concentrations used in triplicate. The linearity range was selected on the basis of absorbance values in the region of around 0.2–0.8. This range of absorbance is known to provide values with the highest precision [34]. The molar absorptivity and A (1%, 1 cm) values were also determined from the calibration curve.


### 2.5.2. Accuracy

The accuracy of the proposed method was determined by adding known concentrations of the drug in the solutions followed by their analysis by the UV spectrometric method. Three different concentrations in triplicate from the studied range were selected and analyzed for the recovery.


### 2.5.3. Precision

The precision of the developed method was calculated by performing nine determinations at three concentrations covering the specified range. The precision was determined by calculating relative standard deviation (%RSD) of the mean recoveries.


### 2.5.4. Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ)

LOD and LOQ of the developed method were calculated from the standard deviation of they-intercept and slope of the calibration curve using the following formulae:(1)
L
O
D
=
3.3
×
σ
S
,
L
O
Q
=
10
×
σ
S
,where σ is the standard deviation of the intercept and S is the slope of the calibration curve.


### 2.5.5. Robustness

The robustness of the method was determined by studying small changes in the assay wavelength (±2 nm). This parameter was studied thrice in the similar range used for the determination of TA (i.e., 1.0–8.0 × 10−5M). The accuracy and precision of the method were determined.


### 2.5.6. Solution Stability

The stability of stock solutions of TA was studied at room (25
±
1°C) and refrigerated temperature (2–8°C). The stock solutions of TA were prepared in pure solvents at a concentration of 1 × 10−4M (2.62 mg%). The samples were stored in tightly sealed glass containers protected from light. A 5 mL aliquot of the sample was taken each time and the absorbencies were measured at 0-, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 24-hour time interval.


## 2.5.1. Linearity and Range

The linearity of the method was determined by preparing calibration curves of absorbance versus the concentration of TA of the test solutions in the concentration range of 1.0–8.0 × 10−5M for each solvent. The linearity was statistically determined by regression analysis of five concentrations used in triplicate. The linearity range was selected on the basis of absorbance values in the region of around 0.2–0.8. This range of absorbance is known to provide values with the highest precision [34]. The molar absorptivity and A (1%, 1 cm) values were also determined from the calibration curve.


## 2.5.2. Accuracy

The accuracy of the proposed method was determined by adding known concentrations of the drug in the solutions followed by their analysis by the UV spectrometric method. Three different concentrations in triplicate from the studied range were selected and analyzed for the recovery.


## 2.5.3. Precision

The precision of the developed method was calculated by performing nine determinations at three concentrations covering the specified range. The precision was determined by calculating relative standard deviation (%RSD) of the mean recoveries.


## 2.5.4. Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ)

LOD and LOQ of the developed method were calculated from the standard deviation of they-intercept and slope of the calibration curve using the following formulae:(1)
L
O
D
=
3.3
×
σ
S
,
L
O
Q
=
10
×
σ
S
,where σ is the standard deviation of the intercept and S is the slope of the calibration curve.


## 2.5.5. Robustness

The robustness of the method was determined by studying small changes in the assay wavelength (±2 nm). This parameter was studied thrice in the similar range used for the determination of TA (i.e., 1.0–8.0 × 10−5M). The accuracy and precision of the method were determined.


## 2.5.6. Solution Stability

The stability of stock solutions of TA was studied at room (25
±
1°C) and refrigerated temperature (2–8°C). The stock solutions of TA were prepared in pure solvents at a concentration of 1 × 10−4M (2.62 mg%). The samples were stored in tightly sealed glass containers protected from light. A 5 mL aliquot of the sample was taken each time and the absorbencies were measured at 0-, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 24-hour time interval.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Confirmation of Purity of Tolfenamic Acid

In order to study spectrometric characteristics of a compound, it is necessary to confirm the purity of the material to avoid any effect on the position and intensity of the absorption maxima as well as on the validation of the assay method. In the case of TA a thin layer chromatography (TLC) examination was conducted to detect any spots other than that of TA on TLC plates. The TLC test for TA has been carried out according to the method described in British Pharmacopoeia [29]. TA appeared as a single spot confirming the purity of the material.


### 3.2. Nature of Solvents and Spectral Characteristics of Tolfenamic Acid

The use of solvents in UV-visible spectrometric measurements depends on the nature of the compound to be characterized or analyzed. The solvent must be transparent in the region in which the compound exhibits absorption spectrum. The compound should have enough solubility to obtain a reasonably clear absorption spectrum. It is also important to consider any possible interaction of the solvent with the absorbing molecule to impart a shift in the absorption maxima. It has been reported that polar solvents such as water, alcohols, esters, and ketones (containing lone pair of electrons) tend to obscure vibrational spectra. The nonpolar solvents such as cyclohexane, chloroform, and benzene give spectra somewhat similar to that of a gas (better band resolution) [35]. The maximum absorption wavelength of the absorption band depends on the degree of solute-solvent interaction and the nature of solvent [36–39]. The solvent dependent spectral shifts arise from either nonspecific (dielectric enrichment) or specific (e.g., hydrogen bonding) solute-solvent interactions. Considering the interactions between the solute and solvent molecule and the intensity of these interactions, a change in the absorption spectrum of the molecule (e.g., λ
m
a
x and ϵ
m
a
x) can be expected. Such a change has been described as solvatochromism [40]. The organic solvents have a different polar character as indicated by the dielectric constant of the medium. It has been observed that an electronic transition of a compound may lead to a modification of the charge distribution by the solvent used. This would result in some change in the position and intensity of the absorption maxima depending on the nature of the solvent. The extent of solute-solvent interaction would give an indication of the type of electronic transition undergone by the molecule [41].The lower wavelength limit of common solvents in the UV and visible spectra strongly depends on the purity of the solvent (Table1). For example, ethanol and the hydrocarbon solvents are frequently contaminated with benzene which absorbs below 280 nm [35]. Therefore, the highest/spectroscopic grade solvents should always be used for the measurement of the absorption spectra of organic compounds; otherwise the true spectral characteristics of a compound may not be obtained due to the presence of interfering impurities.The spectral characteristics of TA including the value of absorption maxima, respective molar absorptivities (ϵ), and specific absorbance [A (1%, 1 cm)] in various organic solvents are reported in Table 2. A consideration of the values of absorption maxima of TA in various organic solvents shows that their λ
1
m
a
x range from 286 to 294 nm and λ
2
m
a
x from 332 to 354 nm (Figure 1, Table 2) with regression values (R
2) of 0.99905–0.99988 showing very small scatter of the points around the calibration curves (Table 3).Table 2
Absorption maxima and molar absorptivities of TA in organic solvents.
Solvent
Absorption maxima (nm)
Molar absorptivity (M−1 cm−1)
A (1%, 1 cm)
λ
1
m
a
x
λ
2
m
a
x
ϵ
λ
1
m
a
x
ϵ
λ
2
m
a
x
λ
1
m
a
x
λ
2
m
a
x
Acetonitrile
286
343
9083
6960
352
266
Methanol
289
335
10371
6328
431
242
Ethanol
289
338
10100
6030
390
230
Acetone
—
347
—
8781
336
336
1-Propanol
288
343
10849
7512
438
287
1-Butanol
294
332
10029
5310
384
203
1-Hexanol
289
344
7926
5380
300
205
Benzyl alcohol
289
352
9386
7711
359
295
1-Octanol
290
343
9118
5884
348
225
Dichloromethane
287
350
10956
8967
416
343
Ethyl acetate
287
343
8995
6593
353
252
Chloroform
288
351
8929
4620
338
176
Toluene
288
354
8539
7141
326
273Table 3
Analytical parameters for the determination of TA in various organic solvents.
Solvent
Linearity range, conc.M
×
10
-
4 (mg%)a
Corr. coeff.
Slope
SEb of slope
Intercept
SEb of intercept
SDc of intercept
Recovery range (%)d
Accuracy (%)e  ± SDc
Precision (%RSD)f
LODg
M
×
10
-
6 (mg%)
LOQh
M
×
10
-
5 (mg%)
Acetonitrile
0.2–0.9 (0.52–2.36)
0.99985
9.08 × 103
0.00419
−0.00102
0.00385
0.01089
98.73–101.07
99.90 ± 0.7899
0.7907
3.96 (0.10)
1.20 (0.31)
Methanol
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99994
1.04 × 104
0.00273
0.03714
0.00277
0.00734
99.24–100.87
99.99 ± 0.6113
0.6113
2.34 (0.06)
7.08 (0.19)
Ethanol
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99992
9.43 × 103
0.00281
0.00218
0.00286
0.00757
99.06–100.85
99.96 ± 0.5969
0.5971
2.65 (0.07)
8.03 (0.21)
Acetone
0.3–1.0 (0.79–2.62)
0.99956
8.78 × 103
0.00690
−0.06210
0.00764
0.02021
98.15–101.40
100.11 ± 1.2665
1.2651
7.60 (0.20)
2.30 (0.60)
1-Propanol
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99971
1.08 × 104
0.00613
0.02508
0.00624
0.01651
98.93–101.18
99.92 ± 0.8370
0.8377
5.02 (0.13)
1.52 (0.40)
1-Butanol
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99953
1.00 × 104
0.00730
0.00595
0.00743
0.01966
95.92–102.39
99.76 ± 2.0754
2.0805
6.47 (0.17)
1.96 (0.51)
1-Hexanol
0.3–1.0 (0.79–2.62)
0.99984
7.93 × 103
0.00378
−0.01175
0.00418
0.01107
98.78–100.99
100.05 ± 0.7348
0.7344
4.61 (0.12)
1.40 (0.37)
Benzyl alcohol
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99983
9.39 × 103
0.00413
0.02471
0.00421
0.01113
99.15–101.27
99.95 ± 0.7502
0.7506
3.91 (0.10)
1.19 (0.31)
1-Octanol
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99996
9.12 × 103
0.00203
0.01139
0.00206
0.00546
99.11–100.71
100.01 ± 0.5566
0.5565
1.97 (0.05)
5.98 (0.16)
Dichloromethane
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99992
1.10 × 104
0.00328
−0.05499
0.00334
0.00884
99.03–101.31
100.06 ± 0.7268
0.7264
2.66 (0.07)
8.07 (0.21)
Ethyl acetate
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99987
8.99 × 103
0.00338
−0.00287
0.00344
0.00911
98.88–101.69
99.96 ± 0.8841
0.8845
3.34 (0.09)
1.01 (0.26)
Chloroform
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99976
8.93 × 103
0.00465
0.02979
0.00473
0.01252
98.88–101.30
99.95 ± 0.8556
0.8560
4.63 (0.12)
1.40 (0.37)
Toluene
0.2–0.9 (0.52–2.36)
0.99990
8.54 × 103
0.00312
−0.00004
0.00287
0.00811
98.67–101.32
100.10 ± 0.8768
0.8760
3.13 (0.08)
9.50 (0.25)
a
n
=
3.
bSE = standard error.
cSD = standard deviation.
dRecovery (%) = (amount found/amount added) × 100
(amount found = absorbance − intercept/slope).
eAccuracy (%) = mean recovery range.
f% of relative standard deviation (%RSD) = (SD/mean) × 100.
gLimit of detection (LOD) = 3.3 × (SD of intercept/slope).
hLimit of quantification (LOQ) = 10 × (SD of intercept/slope).Figure 1
Variations in the absorption maxima of TA in organic solvents. (a) Acetonitrile, (b) methanol, (c) ethanol, (d) 1-propanol, (e) 1-butanol, (f) 1-hexanol, (g) benzyl alcohol, (h) 1-octanol, (i) dichloromethane, (j) ethyl acetate, (k) chloroform, (l) toluene, and (m) acetone.Similarly, a variation in the values ofϵ
m
a
x in these solvents is also observed (Table 2). This is probably due to the degree of interaction between the solute and the solvent to cause a shift in the absorption maxima with accompanying change in the intensity of absorption as indicated by the values of ϵ
m
a
x. The high values of ϵ
m
a
x indicate π-π
∗ electronic transition in the molecule. The values of ϵ
λ
1 range from 7930 to 10960 M−1cm−1 and those of ϵ
λ
2 from 5310 to 8967 M−1cm−1.


### 3.3. Validation of the Assay Method

The UV spectrometric assay of TA in various solvents has been validated according to the guidelines of ICH [32], including the following parameters.


#### 3.3.1. Linearity

Linearity determines the ability of the method to obtain the results that are directly proportional to the concentration of the analyte within a given range by plotting a calibration curve. TA is 2-[(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)amino]benzoic acid and gives two peaks in the region of 280–360 nm (Figure1). The short wavelength peak in the region below 300 nm is more prominent with a greater intensity than the one present above 300 nm. Therefore, calibration curves of TA in each solvent have been prepared with respect to the short wavelength peak in the majority of solvents (Table 2). On the contrary, in the solvent that showed some interference or has a cutoff point near or above the prominent peak of TA such as acetone (330 nm), benzyl alcohol (282 nm), and toluene (286 nm), it has been assayed and validated with respect to the long wavelength peak (Figure 1). Although the calibration curves in benzyl alcohol and toluene have been prepared with respect to the short wavelength peak due to their interfering cutoff points they have further been validated for TA assay using the long wavelength peak. A linear relationship has been found for TA in each solvent and the statistical data are reported in Table 3. The intercept values are significantly close to zero in each case thus confirming the peak purity of TA. The overlay spectra of TA in acetonitrile are shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Overlay spectra of TA in acetonitrile.


#### 3.3.2. Range

It is defined as the interval between the upper and lower concentrations of the analyte that have been demonstrated to be determined with acceptable precision, accuracy, and linearity. The absorbance values in the range of 0.2–0.8 are known to offer the highest precision [34]. Therefore, similar pattern has also been followed in this study in determining the range of TA in each solvent. The ranges for the assay of TA in each solvent are reported in Table 3 which corresponds well to the points in calibration curves.


#### 3.3.3. Accuracy

The accuracy of an analytical method is defined as the degree to which the determined value of an analyte in a sample corresponds to the true value. The results for the percent recovery of TA in different organic solvents are reported in Table3. Although the results show good accuracy for TA in each solvent comparatively the mean recovery in 1-octanol followed by ethanol and methanol is better than that of the others due to minimum standard deviations. The standard deviations are small in all cases indicating that the method can be used with high accuracy for the determination of TA in the studied organic solvents.


#### 3.3.4. Precision

Precision of an analytical method is the closeness of agreement between a series of measurements obtained from multiple samples of the studied drug under prescribed conditions. The results for the precision of the method for the assay of TA in various solvents are reported in Table3. These indicate that the %RSD in the majority of cases is less than 2% and is minimum in the case of 1-octanol with nearly the same values in ethanol and methanol. Thus the studied method is highly reliable for the assay of TA in different solvents.


#### 3.3.5. LOD

It is the lowest concentration of an analyte in a sample that can be detected but not necessarily quantified. It is considered as limit test that indicates that the analyte is above or below a certain value which is usually expressed as percentage of the analyte in the sample. The LOD of TA in each solvent is reported in Table3. The minimum detection limit of 1.97 × 10−6M (0.05 mg%) has been found in 1-octanol while the highest of 6.47 × 10−6M (0.17 mg%) has been found in 1-butanol. This indicates that the UV spectrometric technique is highly sensitive for the detection of TA in various organic solvents.


#### 3.3.6. LOQ

The LOQ determines the lowest concentration of an analyte in a sample that can be quantified with acceptable precision and accuracy under the documented operational conditions of the drug being assayed. The minimum quantification limit of 5.98 × 10−6M (0.16 mg%) has been found in 1-octanol while the highest of 1.96 × 10−5M (0.51 mg%) has been found in 1-butanol. The values of LOQ of TA in each solvent are reported in Table 3. All solvents have been found to correspond well with the quantification of TA by UV spectrometric technique indicating that the method is accurate and precise for its assay.


#### 3.3.7. Robustness

The robustness of an analytical method is a measure of its capacity to obtain acceptable results when perturbed by small but deliberate variations. It is basically an indicator of method suitability and reliability during normal use. Absorbance of a solution is dependent upon wavelength, solvent, pH, and temperature. Therefore, these parameters should remain constant throughout the course of the analysis; otherwise significant errors may arise in the quantitative analysis of the samples [34]. In the present study, the reliability of the method has been tested by determining the absorption maxima in each solvent and by changing the assay wavelengths at room temperature (25
±
1°C). The results showed that small changes in the wavelength of absorption maxima do not affect the accuracy and precision of the assay of TA (Table 4). This indicates that the method is robust under the studied conditions in the majority of the solvents. The highest robustness has been found in acetonitrile whereas the lowest has been found in chloroform followed by acetone (Table 4).Table 4
Robustness of the proposed method in different organic solvents.
Solvents
Wavelength(λ
m
a
x
±
2
n
m)a
Accuracy (%) ± SD
Precision(%RSD)
Acetonitrile
284288
100.02 ± 0.4554100.03 ± 0.5216
0.45530.5215
Methanol
288292
99.91 ± 0.751299.88 ± 1.0125
0.75191.0137
Ethanol
288292
99.93 ± 0.741499.87 ± 1.2148
0.74201.2164
Acetone
345349
100.29 ± 2.8852100.33 ± 3.3030
2.87693.2920
1-Propanol
286290
99.90 ± 0.992499.69 ± 2.4774
0.99342.4851
1-Butanol
292296
99.73 ± 2.144799.99 ± 1.4541
2.15061.4543
1-Hexanol
287291
100.06 ± 0.9026100.05 ± 0.8686
0.90210.8681
Benzyl alcohol
287291350354
99.90 ± 1.105799.94 ± 0.7845100.14 ± 1.4184100.14 ± 1.4571
1.10680.78501.41651.4550
1-Octanol
288292
99.91 ± 0.779699.89 ± 0.9320
0.78030.9330
Dichloromethane
285289
100.16 ± 1.3225100.18 ± 1.4535
1.32031.4508
Ethyl acetate
285289
99.82 ± 1.888199.84 ± 1.7719
1.89141.7748
Chloroform
286290
99.66 ± 3.124899.67 ± 3.1182
3.13533.1285
Toluene
286290352356
99.81 ± 1.3132100.10 ± 0.8523100.04 ± 0.5126100.04 ± 0.5611
1.31570.85140.51240.5608
a
λ
m
a
x for each solvent are reported in Table 2.


#### 3.3.8. Solution Stability

The solution stability is a measure of the extent to which the studied drug is stable in a solvent being used for the assay over a particular period of time under specified conditions. It is an essential requirement that the analyte should not undergo any chemical change and should remain stable in the particular solvent [34].The study of TA was carried out at room temperature (25
±
1°C) and refrigerated temperature (2–8°C). The consistency in absorbance indicated the stability of TA solutions. In all solvents no significant change has been observed in the absorbance of TA after 24 hours of storage either at room temperature or in a refrigerator. However, in spite of the stability of TA in the organic solvents for at least 24 hours, fresh solutions were used for the validation study.


## 3.1. Confirmation of Purity of Tolfenamic Acid

In order to study spectrometric characteristics of a compound, it is necessary to confirm the purity of the material to avoid any effect on the position and intensity of the absorption maxima as well as on the validation of the assay method. In the case of TA a thin layer chromatography (TLC) examination was conducted to detect any spots other than that of TA on TLC plates. The TLC test for TA has been carried out according to the method described in British Pharmacopoeia [29]. TA appeared as a single spot confirming the purity of the material.


## 3.2. Nature of Solvents and Spectral Characteristics of Tolfenamic Acid

The use of solvents in UV-visible spectrometric measurements depends on the nature of the compound to be characterized or analyzed. The solvent must be transparent in the region in which the compound exhibits absorption spectrum. The compound should have enough solubility to obtain a reasonably clear absorption spectrum. It is also important to consider any possible interaction of the solvent with the absorbing molecule to impart a shift in the absorption maxima. It has been reported that polar solvents such as water, alcohols, esters, and ketones (containing lone pair of electrons) tend to obscure vibrational spectra. The nonpolar solvents such as cyclohexane, chloroform, and benzene give spectra somewhat similar to that of a gas (better band resolution) [35]. The maximum absorption wavelength of the absorption band depends on the degree of solute-solvent interaction and the nature of solvent [36–39]. The solvent dependent spectral shifts arise from either nonspecific (dielectric enrichment) or specific (e.g., hydrogen bonding) solute-solvent interactions. Considering the interactions between the solute and solvent molecule and the intensity of these interactions, a change in the absorption spectrum of the molecule (e.g., λ
m
a
x and ϵ
m
a
x) can be expected. Such a change has been described as solvatochromism [40]. The organic solvents have a different polar character as indicated by the dielectric constant of the medium. It has been observed that an electronic transition of a compound may lead to a modification of the charge distribution by the solvent used. This would result in some change in the position and intensity of the absorption maxima depending on the nature of the solvent. The extent of solute-solvent interaction would give an indication of the type of electronic transition undergone by the molecule [41].The lower wavelength limit of common solvents in the UV and visible spectra strongly depends on the purity of the solvent (Table1). For example, ethanol and the hydrocarbon solvents are frequently contaminated with benzene which absorbs below 280 nm [35]. Therefore, the highest/spectroscopic grade solvents should always be used for the measurement of the absorption spectra of organic compounds; otherwise the true spectral characteristics of a compound may not be obtained due to the presence of interfering impurities.The spectral characteristics of TA including the value of absorption maxima, respective molar absorptivities (ϵ), and specific absorbance [A (1%, 1 cm)] in various organic solvents are reported in Table 2. A consideration of the values of absorption maxima of TA in various organic solvents shows that their λ
1
m
a
x range from 286 to 294 nm and λ
2
m
a
x from 332 to 354 nm (Figure 1, Table 2) with regression values (R
2) of 0.99905–0.99988 showing very small scatter of the points around the calibration curves (Table 3).Table 2
Absorption maxima and molar absorptivities of TA in organic solvents.
Solvent
Absorption maxima (nm)
Molar absorptivity (M−1 cm−1)
A (1%, 1 cm)
λ
1
m
a
x
λ
2
m
a
x
ϵ
λ
1
m
a
x
ϵ
λ
2
m
a
x
λ
1
m
a
x
λ
2
m
a
x
Acetonitrile
286
343
9083
6960
352
266
Methanol
289
335
10371
6328
431
242
Ethanol
289
338
10100
6030
390
230
Acetone
—
347
—
8781
336
336
1-Propanol
288
343
10849
7512
438
287
1-Butanol
294
332
10029
5310
384
203
1-Hexanol
289
344
7926
5380
300
205
Benzyl alcohol
289
352
9386
7711
359
295
1-Octanol
290
343
9118
5884
348
225
Dichloromethane
287
350
10956
8967
416
343
Ethyl acetate
287
343
8995
6593
353
252
Chloroform
288
351
8929
4620
338
176
Toluene
288
354
8539
7141
326
273Table 3
Analytical parameters for the determination of TA in various organic solvents.
Solvent
Linearity range, conc.M
×
10
-
4 (mg%)a
Corr. coeff.
Slope
SEb of slope
Intercept
SEb of intercept
SDc of intercept
Recovery range (%)d
Accuracy (%)e  ± SDc
Precision (%RSD)f
LODg
M
×
10
-
6 (mg%)
LOQh
M
×
10
-
5 (mg%)
Acetonitrile
0.2–0.9 (0.52–2.36)
0.99985
9.08 × 103
0.00419
−0.00102
0.00385
0.01089
98.73–101.07
99.90 ± 0.7899
0.7907
3.96 (0.10)
1.20 (0.31)
Methanol
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99994
1.04 × 104
0.00273
0.03714
0.00277
0.00734
99.24–100.87
99.99 ± 0.6113
0.6113
2.34 (0.06)
7.08 (0.19)
Ethanol
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99992
9.43 × 103
0.00281
0.00218
0.00286
0.00757
99.06–100.85
99.96 ± 0.5969
0.5971
2.65 (0.07)
8.03 (0.21)
Acetone
0.3–1.0 (0.79–2.62)
0.99956
8.78 × 103
0.00690
−0.06210
0.00764
0.02021
98.15–101.40
100.11 ± 1.2665
1.2651
7.60 (0.20)
2.30 (0.60)
1-Propanol
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99971
1.08 × 104
0.00613
0.02508
0.00624
0.01651
98.93–101.18
99.92 ± 0.8370
0.8377
5.02 (0.13)
1.52 (0.40)
1-Butanol
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99953
1.00 × 104
0.00730
0.00595
0.00743
0.01966
95.92–102.39
99.76 ± 2.0754
2.0805
6.47 (0.17)
1.96 (0.51)
1-Hexanol
0.3–1.0 (0.79–2.62)
0.99984
7.93 × 103
0.00378
−0.01175
0.00418
0.01107
98.78–100.99
100.05 ± 0.7348
0.7344
4.61 (0.12)
1.40 (0.37)
Benzyl alcohol
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99983
9.39 × 103
0.00413
0.02471
0.00421
0.01113
99.15–101.27
99.95 ± 0.7502
0.7506
3.91 (0.10)
1.19 (0.31)
1-Octanol
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99996
9.12 × 103
0.00203
0.01139
0.00206
0.00546
99.11–100.71
100.01 ± 0.5566
0.5565
1.97 (0.05)
5.98 (0.16)
Dichloromethane
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99992
1.10 × 104
0.00328
−0.05499
0.00334
0.00884
99.03–101.31
100.06 ± 0.7268
0.7264
2.66 (0.07)
8.07 (0.21)
Ethyl acetate
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99987
8.99 × 103
0.00338
−0.00287
0.00344
0.00911
98.88–101.69
99.96 ± 0.8841
0.8845
3.34 (0.09)
1.01 (0.26)
Chloroform
0.2–0.8 (0.52–2.09)
0.99976
8.93 × 103
0.00465
0.02979
0.00473
0.01252
98.88–101.30
99.95 ± 0.8556
0.8560
4.63 (0.12)
1.40 (0.37)
Toluene
0.2–0.9 (0.52–2.36)
0.99990
8.54 × 103
0.00312
−0.00004
0.00287
0.00811
98.67–101.32
100.10 ± 0.8768
0.8760
3.13 (0.08)
9.50 (0.25)
a
n
=
3.
bSE = standard error.
cSD = standard deviation.
dRecovery (%) = (amount found/amount added) × 100
(amount found = absorbance − intercept/slope).
eAccuracy (%) = mean recovery range.
f% of relative standard deviation (%RSD) = (SD/mean) × 100.
gLimit of detection (LOD) = 3.3 × (SD of intercept/slope).
hLimit of quantification (LOQ) = 10 × (SD of intercept/slope).Figure 1
Variations in the absorption maxima of TA in organic solvents. (a) Acetonitrile, (b) methanol, (c) ethanol, (d) 1-propanol, (e) 1-butanol, (f) 1-hexanol, (g) benzyl alcohol, (h) 1-octanol, (i) dichloromethane, (j) ethyl acetate, (k) chloroform, (l) toluene, and (m) acetone.Similarly, a variation in the values ofϵ
m
a
x in these solvents is also observed (Table 2). This is probably due to the degree of interaction between the solute and the solvent to cause a shift in the absorption maxima with accompanying change in the intensity of absorption as indicated by the values of ϵ
m
a
x. The high values of ϵ
m
a
x indicate π-π
∗ electronic transition in the molecule. The values of ϵ
λ
1 range from 7930 to 10960 M−1cm−1 and those of ϵ
λ
2 from 5310 to 8967 M−1cm−1.


## 3.3. Validation of the Assay Method

The UV spectrometric assay of TA in various solvents has been validated according to the guidelines of ICH [32], including the following parameters.


### 3.3.1. Linearity

Linearity determines the ability of the method to obtain the results that are directly proportional to the concentration of the analyte within a given range by plotting a calibration curve. TA is 2-[(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)amino]benzoic acid and gives two peaks in the region of 280–360 nm (Figure1). The short wavelength peak in the region below 300 nm is more prominent with a greater intensity than the one present above 300 nm. Therefore, calibration curves of TA in each solvent have been prepared with respect to the short wavelength peak in the majority of solvents (Table 2). On the contrary, in the solvent that showed some interference or has a cutoff point near or above the prominent peak of TA such as acetone (330 nm), benzyl alcohol (282 nm), and toluene (286 nm), it has been assayed and validated with respect to the long wavelength peak (Figure 1). Although the calibration curves in benzyl alcohol and toluene have been prepared with respect to the short wavelength peak due to their interfering cutoff points they have further been validated for TA assay using the long wavelength peak. A linear relationship has been found for TA in each solvent and the statistical data are reported in Table 3. The intercept values are significantly close to zero in each case thus confirming the peak purity of TA. The overlay spectra of TA in acetonitrile are shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Overlay spectra of TA in acetonitrile.


### 3.3.2. Range

It is defined as the interval between the upper and lower concentrations of the analyte that have been demonstrated to be determined with acceptable precision, accuracy, and linearity. The absorbance values in the range of 0.2–0.8 are known to offer the highest precision [34]. Therefore, similar pattern has also been followed in this study in determining the range of TA in each solvent. The ranges for the assay of TA in each solvent are reported in Table 3 which corresponds well to the points in calibration curves.


### 3.3.3. Accuracy

The accuracy of an analytical method is defined as the degree to which the determined value of an analyte in a sample corresponds to the true value. The results for the percent recovery of TA in different organic solvents are reported in Table3. Although the results show good accuracy for TA in each solvent comparatively the mean recovery in 1-octanol followed by ethanol and methanol is better than that of the others due to minimum standard deviations. The standard deviations are small in all cases indicating that the method can be used with high accuracy for the determination of TA in the studied organic solvents.


### 3.3.4. Precision

Precision of an analytical method is the closeness of agreement between a series of measurements obtained from multiple samples of the studied drug under prescribed conditions. The results for the precision of the method for the assay of TA in various solvents are reported in Table3. These indicate that the %RSD in the majority of cases is less than 2% and is minimum in the case of 1-octanol with nearly the same values in ethanol and methanol. Thus the studied method is highly reliable for the assay of TA in different solvents.


### 3.3.5. LOD

It is the lowest concentration of an analyte in a sample that can be detected but not necessarily quantified. It is considered as limit test that indicates that the analyte is above or below a certain value which is usually expressed as percentage of the analyte in the sample. The LOD of TA in each solvent is reported in Table3. The minimum detection limit of 1.97 × 10−6M (0.05 mg%) has been found in 1-octanol while the highest of 6.47 × 10−6M (0.17 mg%) has been found in 1-butanol. This indicates that the UV spectrometric technique is highly sensitive for the detection of TA in various organic solvents.


### 3.3.6. LOQ

The LOQ determines the lowest concentration of an analyte in a sample that can be quantified with acceptable precision and accuracy under the documented operational conditions of the drug being assayed. The minimum quantification limit of 5.98 × 10−6M (0.16 mg%) has been found in 1-octanol while the highest of 1.96 × 10−5M (0.51 mg%) has been found in 1-butanol. The values of LOQ of TA in each solvent are reported in Table 3. All solvents have been found to correspond well with the quantification of TA by UV spectrometric technique indicating that the method is accurate and precise for its assay.


### 3.3.7. Robustness

The robustness of an analytical method is a measure of its capacity to obtain acceptable results when perturbed by small but deliberate variations. It is basically an indicator of method suitability and reliability during normal use. Absorbance of a solution is dependent upon wavelength, solvent, pH, and temperature. Therefore, these parameters should remain constant throughout the course of the analysis; otherwise significant errors may arise in the quantitative analysis of the samples [34]. In the present study, the reliability of the method has been tested by determining the absorption maxima in each solvent and by changing the assay wavelengths at room temperature (25
±
1°C). The results showed that small changes in the wavelength of absorption maxima do not affect the accuracy and precision of the assay of TA (Table 4). This indicates that the method is robust under the studied conditions in the majority of the solvents. The highest robustness has been found in acetonitrile whereas the lowest has been found in chloroform followed by acetone (Table 4).Table 4
Robustness of the proposed method in different organic solvents.
Solvents
Wavelength(λ
m
a
x
±
2
n
m)a
Accuracy (%) ± SD
Precision(%RSD)
Acetonitrile
284288
100.02 ± 0.4554100.03 ± 0.5216
0.45530.5215
Methanol
288292
99.91 ± 0.751299.88 ± 1.0125
0.75191.0137
Ethanol
288292
99.93 ± 0.741499.87 ± 1.2148
0.74201.2164
Acetone
345349
100.29 ± 2.8852100.33 ± 3.3030
2.87693.2920
1-Propanol
286290
99.90 ± 0.992499.69 ± 2.4774
0.99342.4851
1-Butanol
292296
99.73 ± 2.144799.99 ± 1.4541
2.15061.4543
1-Hexanol
287291
100.06 ± 0.9026100.05 ± 0.8686
0.90210.8681
Benzyl alcohol
287291350354
99.90 ± 1.105799.94 ± 0.7845100.14 ± 1.4184100.14 ± 1.4571
1.10680.78501.41651.4550
1-Octanol
288292
99.91 ± 0.779699.89 ± 0.9320
0.78030.9330
Dichloromethane
285289
100.16 ± 1.3225100.18 ± 1.4535
1.32031.4508
Ethyl acetate
285289
99.82 ± 1.888199.84 ± 1.7719
1.89141.7748
Chloroform
286290
99.66 ± 3.124899.67 ± 3.1182
3.13533.1285
Toluene
286290352356
99.81 ± 1.3132100.10 ± 0.8523100.04 ± 0.5126100.04 ± 0.5611
1.31570.85140.51240.5608
a
λ
m
a
x for each solvent are reported in Table 2.


### 3.3.8. Solution Stability

The solution stability is a measure of the extent to which the studied drug is stable in a solvent being used for the assay over a particular period of time under specified conditions. It is an essential requirement that the analyte should not undergo any chemical change and should remain stable in the particular solvent [34].The study of TA was carried out at room temperature (25
±
1°C) and refrigerated temperature (2–8°C). The consistency in absorbance indicated the stability of TA solutions. In all solvents no significant change has been observed in the absorbance of TA after 24 hours of storage either at room temperature or in a refrigerator. However, in spite of the stability of TA in the organic solvents for at least 24 hours, fresh solutions were used for the validation study.


## 3.3.1. Linearity

Linearity determines the ability of the method to obtain the results that are directly proportional to the concentration of the analyte within a given range by plotting a calibration curve. TA is 2-[(3-chloro-2-methylphenyl)amino]benzoic acid and gives two peaks in the region of 280–360 nm (Figure1). The short wavelength peak in the region below 300 nm is more prominent with a greater intensity than the one present above 300 nm. Therefore, calibration curves of TA in each solvent have been prepared with respect to the short wavelength peak in the majority of solvents (Table 2). On the contrary, in the solvent that showed some interference or has a cutoff point near or above the prominent peak of TA such as acetone (330 nm), benzyl alcohol (282 nm), and toluene (286 nm), it has been assayed and validated with respect to the long wavelength peak (Figure 1). Although the calibration curves in benzyl alcohol and toluene have been prepared with respect to the short wavelength peak due to their interfering cutoff points they have further been validated for TA assay using the long wavelength peak. A linear relationship has been found for TA in each solvent and the statistical data are reported in Table 3. The intercept values are significantly close to zero in each case thus confirming the peak purity of TA. The overlay spectra of TA in acetonitrile are shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Overlay spectra of TA in acetonitrile.


## 3.3.2. Range

It is defined as the interval between the upper and lower concentrations of the analyte that have been demonstrated to be determined with acceptable precision, accuracy, and linearity. The absorbance values in the range of 0.2–0.8 are known to offer the highest precision [34]. Therefore, similar pattern has also been followed in this study in determining the range of TA in each solvent. The ranges for the assay of TA in each solvent are reported in Table 3 which corresponds well to the points in calibration curves.


## 3.3.3. Accuracy

The accuracy of an analytical method is defined as the degree to which the determined value of an analyte in a sample corresponds to the true value. The results for the percent recovery of TA in different organic solvents are reported in Table3. Although the results show good accuracy for TA in each solvent comparatively the mean recovery in 1-octanol followed by ethanol and methanol is better than that of the others due to minimum standard deviations. The standard deviations are small in all cases indicating that the method can be used with high accuracy for the determination of TA in the studied organic solvents.


## 3.3.4. Precision

Precision of an analytical method is the closeness of agreement between a series of measurements obtained from multiple samples of the studied drug under prescribed conditions. The results for the precision of the method for the assay of TA in various solvents are reported in Table3. These indicate that the %RSD in the majority of cases is less than 2% and is minimum in the case of 1-octanol with nearly the same values in ethanol and methanol. Thus the studied method is highly reliable for the assay of TA in different solvents.


## 3.3.5. LOD

It is the lowest concentration of an analyte in a sample that can be detected but not necessarily quantified. It is considered as limit test that indicates that the analyte is above or below a certain value which is usually expressed as percentage of the analyte in the sample. The LOD of TA in each solvent is reported in Table3. The minimum detection limit of 1.97 × 10−6M (0.05 mg%) has been found in 1-octanol while the highest of 6.47 × 10−6M (0.17 mg%) has been found in 1-butanol. This indicates that the UV spectrometric technique is highly sensitive for the detection of TA in various organic solvents.


## 3.3.6. LOQ

The LOQ determines the lowest concentration of an analyte in a sample that can be quantified with acceptable precision and accuracy under the documented operational conditions of the drug being assayed. The minimum quantification limit of 5.98 × 10−6M (0.16 mg%) has been found in 1-octanol while the highest of 1.96 × 10−5M (0.51 mg%) has been found in 1-butanol. The values of LOQ of TA in each solvent are reported in Table 3. All solvents have been found to correspond well with the quantification of TA by UV spectrometric technique indicating that the method is accurate and precise for its assay.


## 3.3.7. Robustness

The robustness of an analytical method is a measure of its capacity to obtain acceptable results when perturbed by small but deliberate variations. It is basically an indicator of method suitability and reliability during normal use. Absorbance of a solution is dependent upon wavelength, solvent, pH, and temperature. Therefore, these parameters should remain constant throughout the course of the analysis; otherwise significant errors may arise in the quantitative analysis of the samples [34]. In the present study, the reliability of the method has been tested by determining the absorption maxima in each solvent and by changing the assay wavelengths at room temperature (25
±
1°C). The results showed that small changes in the wavelength of absorption maxima do not affect the accuracy and precision of the assay of TA (Table 4). This indicates that the method is robust under the studied conditions in the majority of the solvents. The highest robustness has been found in acetonitrile whereas the lowest has been found in chloroform followed by acetone (Table 4).Table 4
Robustness of the proposed method in different organic solvents.
Solvents
Wavelength(λ
m
a
x
±
2
n
m)a
Accuracy (%) ± SD
Precision(%RSD)
Acetonitrile
284288
100.02 ± 0.4554100.03 ± 0.5216
0.45530.5215
Methanol
288292
99.91 ± 0.751299.88 ± 1.0125
0.75191.0137
Ethanol
288292
99.93 ± 0.741499.87 ± 1.2148
0.74201.2164
Acetone
345349
100.29 ± 2.8852100.33 ± 3.3030
2.87693.2920
1-Propanol
286290
99.90 ± 0.992499.69 ± 2.4774
0.99342.4851
1-Butanol
292296
99.73 ± 2.144799.99 ± 1.4541
2.15061.4543
1-Hexanol
287291
100.06 ± 0.9026100.05 ± 0.8686
0.90210.8681
Benzyl alcohol
287291350354
99.90 ± 1.105799.94 ± 0.7845100.14 ± 1.4184100.14 ± 1.4571
1.10680.78501.41651.4550
1-Octanol
288292
99.91 ± 0.779699.89 ± 0.9320
0.78030.9330
Dichloromethane
285289
100.16 ± 1.3225100.18 ± 1.4535
1.32031.4508
Ethyl acetate
285289
99.82 ± 1.888199.84 ± 1.7719
1.89141.7748
Chloroform
286290
99.66 ± 3.124899.67 ± 3.1182
3.13533.1285
Toluene
286290352356
99.81 ± 1.3132100.10 ± 0.8523100.04 ± 0.5126100.04 ± 0.5611
1.31570.85140.51240.5608
a
λ
m
a
x for each solvent are reported in Table 2.


## 3.3.8. Solution Stability

The solution stability is a measure of the extent to which the studied drug is stable in a solvent being used for the assay over a particular period of time under specified conditions. It is an essential requirement that the analyte should not undergo any chemical change and should remain stable in the particular solvent [34].The study of TA was carried out at room temperature (25
±
1°C) and refrigerated temperature (2–8°C). The consistency in absorbance indicated the stability of TA solutions. In all solvents no significant change has been observed in the absorbance of TA after 24 hours of storage either at room temperature or in a refrigerator. However, in spite of the stability of TA in the organic solvents for at least 24 hours, fresh solutions were used for the validation study.


## 4. Conclusion

The present study has employed thirteen commonly used solvents for the validation of a UV spectrometric method for the determination of TA. The results indicated that the method is accurate, precise, robust, economical, and rapid for the assay of TA with a stock solution stability of 24 hours in each solvent. TA exhibits two peaks in the UV region of 280–360 nm. The major short wavelength peak is in the region of 285–295 nm that showed good results for the assay of TA. Those solvents that have a cutoff point in this region or interfere with the major peak can also be used for the determination of TA with respect to the minor long wavelength peak in the region of 335–355 nm.The results of this study highlight the effect of different solvents on the spectral characteristics of organic molecules of pharmaceutical importance. Some shifts in the absorption maxima of TA have been noted probably due to drug-solvent interaction while absorptivity constants of TA in each solvent have also been determined. These shifts can affect the wavelengths used for the assay of a compound and, therefore, it is necessary to use a particular solvent for assay purpose. It is also necessary to confirm the purity of the solvent used for assay and its interference in the spectral region of the compound to be studied. A detailed investigation of the effect of solvent parameters on the spectral characteristics of a compound is required to develop an understanding of the changes observed. Such study would help the pharmaceutical formulators and analysts to determine TA in pharmaceutical systems incorporating organic solvents.



---

*Source: 216249-2015-12-10.xml*