# Phytochemical Characterization,In Vitro Antioxidant Activity, and Quantitative Analysis by Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography of Hawthorn (Crataegus pubescens) Fruit

Authors: Francisco Erik González-Jiménez; Juan Alfredo Salazar-Montoya; Graciano Calva-Calva; Emma Gloria Ramos-Ramírez
Journal: Journal of Food Quality
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Due to their antioxidant properties, polyphenolic compounds are considered beneficial for human health. In this work, we investigated the polyphenol profile and antioxidant activity of edible tejocote (Crataegus pubescens) fruit extracts by micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) and HPLC/UV. The major phenolic compounds in the pulp extracts were (+)-catechin (9.17 ± 0.20 mg/100 mg dry fruit), (−)-epicatechin (4.32 ± 0.11 mg/100 mg dry fruit), and chlorogenic acid (5.60 ± 0.24 mg/100 mg dry fruit). The total phenolic content was 168.6 ± 0.9 mg gallic acid equivalent/g dry fruit; the total proanthocyanidin content was 84.6 ± 1.4 mg cyanidin/100 g dry fruit; and the total flavonoid content was 55.89 ± 1.43 mg quercetin/g dry fruit. Interestingly, procyanidins (dimers, trimers, and tetramers of (−)-epicatechin and (+)-catechin) were detected in the extract. This is the first study reporting the presence of polymeric polyphenols in Crataegus pubescens fruit. Accordingly, these fruits demonstrate great potential as a natural source of antioxidant phenolic compounds and could therefore be used as a nutraceutical and functional food.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

TheCrataegus genus has been recognized as a medicinal and ornamental plant tree, comprising approximately 1000 species worldwide [1, 2]. The genus Crataegus belongs to the Rosaceae family and is widespread in the Northern Hemisphere, distributed mainly in Asia, Europe, and North America [1]. In Mexico, hawthorn (C. pubescens) is known as “tejocote,” which is a native species with reports of its edible use in native populations and in traditional medicine; however, the components involved in its biological activities have not been described, and its use has been limited mainly to making jelly and jam due to the high content of pectin [3, 4], with limited agroindustrial applications [5]. Several studies of Crataegus spp. worldwide have demonstrated their potential as a source of valuable phytochemical compounds [1, 2, 6–8]. Among the antioxidant phytochemicals reported in the extracts from the genus Crataegus are procyanidins, flavonoids, flavonols, glycosylated flavanones, and triterpene pentacyclic acids [6, 9–11], all considered as important therapeutic options against hypertension, angina pectoris, heart arrhythmia, and the first stages of congestive heart failure. Typically, procyanidins and triterpene pentacyclic acids are most abundant in fruits [6, 9, 11], and flavonoids are most abundant in leaves [10, 11]. However, for C. pubescens, information is limited, and it is mainly focused on the extraction and characterization of pectin [12, 13], leaving aside the importance of phytochemical compounds as phenolic antioxidant compounds that play a significant role in preventing chronic diseases by reducing the oxidative damage caused by highly reactive oxygen species [14–16]. The use of several Crataegus species in traditional medicine has motivated the scientific study of some of these species [4]. The determination of the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of some endemic species of this genus could lead to identifying potentially active compounds [17] or including new species as possible nutraceuticals. The interest in these products increases when they are obtained from unconventional crops, such as tejocote (C. pubescens) [7]. Thus, the aim of this work was to investigate the potential of tejocote (C. pubescens) fruits as an alternative source to the Crataegus originating from Asia and Europe to obtain bioactive compounds and to contribute to the identification of the compounds involved in the pharmacological activities empirically reported for this native species from Mexico. The profile of the polyphenolic compounds in C. pubescens was studied using micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC), HPLC/UV, and ESI-MS/MS to identify and quantify the main phenolic compounds. The antioxidant activity was evaluated using the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) method, and the trapping capability of superoxide radical was evaluated by the xanthine-xanthine oxidase system.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Plant Material

The tejocote (C. pubescens) fruits were from the 2011 harvest (purchased at Central Market, Mexico City). The selected fruits were those with a yellow epidermis, diameter between 2.1 and 3.2 cm and weight between 9 and 16 g, discarding those with obvious mechanical damage. The manually selected fruits were washed and kept at −20°C under a nitrogen atmosphere.


### 2.2. Phenolic Extract Preparation

Extracts were obtained as reported by Pérez-Jiménez et al. [18], with some modifications. Briefly, fragments of freeze-dried pulp fruit (1 g) were mixed with 50 mL of methanol-water (1 : 1 v/v) for 1 h. The supernatant was separated and reserved, and the solid residue was blended for 1 h with acetone-water (7 : 3 v/v) at room temperature. The mixture was centrifuged at 3000 g for 15 min, the pellet was discarded, and the supernatant was mixed with the first supernatant and concentrated with a rotary evaporator to lyophilize the sample. The lyophilized extract was resuspended in 10 mL of methanol and kept at −20°C.


### 2.3. Characterization of the Phenolic Extract

The phenolic extract from the freeze-dried fruits of tejocote was phytochemically characterized for its quality, yield, and chemical composition before investigation of its antioxidant activity. Due to the extraction procedure, the carbohydrate content and the phenolic profiles were used as quality and integrity criteria of the extracts, following the suggestion of Dai and Mumper [19].


#### 2.3.1. Total Carbohydrate Content

The total carbohydrate content of the phenolic extract was determined by the phenol-sulfuric acid method [20]. Briefly, 1 mL of sample was added to 0.6 mL of phenol (5%) and mixed with 3.6 mL of sulfuric acid. The mixture was cooled for 30 min, and the absorbance was measured at 480 nm. A standard curve using glucose (10–100 mg/L) was generated.


#### 2.3.2. Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content of the extracts was estimated as reported by Pastrana-Bonilla et al. [21]. Briefly, 100 μL of extract was mixed with 100 μL of deionized water, 1 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (2 M), and 0.8 mL of sodium carbonate (7.5%). The sample was vortex-mixed for 5 seconds and incubated for 30 minutes in the dark, and the absorbance was measured at 760 nm. The results were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) in mg equivalent to gallic acid/g fruit.


#### 2.3.3. Total Flavonoid Content

The flavonoids content was estimated by a colorimetric method based on aluminum chloride as reported by Vongsak et al. [22] and expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) in mg equivalent to quercetin/g fruit.


#### 2.3.4. Proanthocyanidin Content

The total proanthocyanidin content was estimated using a spectrophotometric method based on acid hydrolysis of the sample with HCl/n-butanol [23, 24], with some modifications. Briefly, 5 mg of phenolic extract was resuspended in 1 mL of methanol. Samples of 0.25 mL were added to 3 mL of n-butanol-HCl (95/5, v/v) in screw-cap tubes. Then, 0.1 mL of NH4Fe(SO4)212 H2O in HCl 2 M (0.2% m/v) was added, and the tubes were incubated for 40 min at 95°C. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and the absorbance measured at 540 nm. A standard curve using cyanidin chloride in methanol (0–10 mg/L) was performed. The results were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) in mg equivalent to cyanidin chloride/100 g fruit.


### 2.4. Phenolic Profile Determination

Due to the complexity of the phenolic extracts, three methods were used for the assay and quantification of their chemical constituents.


#### 2.4.1. HPLC/UV Analysis

The HPLC/UV analysis of the phenolic profile was performed with acetonitrile and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) as the mobile phase as reported by Martínez-Juarez et al. [25], using an HPLC system with a 20 µL loop and a Spectra System UV-visible optical scanning detector (Thermo Separation Products Inc.) that allows the UV/VIS detection of all solutes eluting from the HPLC column. The detector signals were captured and processed by the PC1000 system software (Thermo Separation Products Inc.).


#### 2.4.2. ESI-MS/MS Analysis

MS/MS analysis was performed using a 3200 QTRAP system (Applied Biosystems/MDS, USA). The ionization was performed by electrospray (ESI-MS) with a collision energy of 50 V. The ions were detected in positive mode.


#### 2.4.3. Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography (MEKC) Analysis

The analysis was performed as reported by Lee et al. [26] using a P/ACE™ MDQ Capillary Electrophoresis system (Beckman Coulter™) with a photodiode array detector and a fused silica capillary (50 cm effective length and 60 cm total length) with 75 µm ID. The assay conditions were adjusted as required by the standards ((−)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin, and chlorogenic acid) in ethanol. The final conditions for good resolution were as follows: hydrodynamic injection (4 seconds, 0.5 psi), 24 kV for 15 minutes, capillary temperature at 22°C, buffer (28 mM Na2B4O7, 3.2 mM KH2PO4, and 24 mM SDS, pH 8.8), and a resultant current of ∼80 amperes. The spectral data were evaluated from 190 to 360 nm, and the wavelength for integration and quantification was 217 nm.


### 2.5. Antioxidant Activity

#### 2.5.1. DPPH Activity

The antioxidant activity of the extracts was evaluated through the DPPH˙ (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging assay as described by Sánchez-Moreno et al. [27]. The reaction was performed using 3.9 mL of DPPH˙ in methanol (0.025 g/L) and 0.1 mL of the phenolic extracts diluted at several concentrations. The absorbance was read at 515 nm. The remaining quantity of DPPH˙ (% remaining DPPH˙) was defined as follows: 100 × (absorbance of the sample/absorbance of the control).


#### 2.5.2. Antiradical Efficiency (AE)

The antiradical efficiency (AE) or the trapping capability of free radicals by the phenolic extract was evaluated as suggested by Sánchez-Moreno et al. [27]. The AE was calculated by the mathematical expression 1/(EC50 TEC50). EC50 is the amount of phenolic extract necessary to decrease by 50% the initial DPPH˙ concentration, and it was extrapolated from the curve of the remaining DPPH˙ against the concentrations for each phenolic extract. On the other hand, TEC50 is the reaction time to reach a steady state at the concentration of the phenolic extract corresponding to the EC50 value, and it was determined graphically by plotting the times at the steady state against the concentration for each phenolic extract.


#### 2.5.3. Neutralizer Activity Superoxide Radical

The analysis of the trapping capability of the superoxide radical of the phenolic extracts was performed as described by Aruoma et al. [28]. The superoxide radical was generated by using a xanthine-xanthine oxidase as described by McCord and Fridovich [29]. The reaction mixture was as follows: 2 mL of buffer KH2PO4–KOH (100 mM, pH 7.4), 25 µL of xanthine (20 mM), 50 µL of EDTA (0.3 mM), 25 µL of Nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) (3 mM), 100 µL of sample (changeable phenolic concentration), and finally, 75 µL of xanthine oxidase diluted in the above phosphate buffer (1 unit/mL). The absorbance was measured continuously at 560 nm in a closed 1 cm quartz cell at 25°C for 20 minutes. A control sample was prepared using deionized water instead of the phenolic extracts. The trapping activity of the superoxide radical of each phenolic extract was expressed as EC50 and as the inhibition percentage of the NBT reduction (% inhibition) and calculated using the relation: 100 × (absorbance control − absorbance sample)/(absorbance control).


#### 2.5.4. Statistical Analyses

For the quantification of polyphenols by MEKC, the data obtained from the calibration curves were adjusted by linear regression with coefficients of variation less than 3% and a value ofR2 greater than 0.9900. Data were plotted using SigmaPlot (version 12.3 Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, California). All experiments were done in triplicate, and the results are reported as the mean ± S.D.


## 2.1. Plant Material

The tejocote (C. pubescens) fruits were from the 2011 harvest (purchased at Central Market, Mexico City). The selected fruits were those with a yellow epidermis, diameter between 2.1 and 3.2 cm and weight between 9 and 16 g, discarding those with obvious mechanical damage. The manually selected fruits were washed and kept at −20°C under a nitrogen atmosphere.


## 2.2. Phenolic Extract Preparation

Extracts were obtained as reported by Pérez-Jiménez et al. [18], with some modifications. Briefly, fragments of freeze-dried pulp fruit (1 g) were mixed with 50 mL of methanol-water (1 : 1 v/v) for 1 h. The supernatant was separated and reserved, and the solid residue was blended for 1 h with acetone-water (7 : 3 v/v) at room temperature. The mixture was centrifuged at 3000 g for 15 min, the pellet was discarded, and the supernatant was mixed with the first supernatant and concentrated with a rotary evaporator to lyophilize the sample. The lyophilized extract was resuspended in 10 mL of methanol and kept at −20°C.


## 2.3. Characterization of the Phenolic Extract

The phenolic extract from the freeze-dried fruits of tejocote was phytochemically characterized for its quality, yield, and chemical composition before investigation of its antioxidant activity. Due to the extraction procedure, the carbohydrate content and the phenolic profiles were used as quality and integrity criteria of the extracts, following the suggestion of Dai and Mumper [19].


### 2.3.1. Total Carbohydrate Content

The total carbohydrate content of the phenolic extract was determined by the phenol-sulfuric acid method [20]. Briefly, 1 mL of sample was added to 0.6 mL of phenol (5%) and mixed with 3.6 mL of sulfuric acid. The mixture was cooled for 30 min, and the absorbance was measured at 480 nm. A standard curve using glucose (10–100 mg/L) was generated.


### 2.3.2. Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content of the extracts was estimated as reported by Pastrana-Bonilla et al. [21]. Briefly, 100 μL of extract was mixed with 100 μL of deionized water, 1 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (2 M), and 0.8 mL of sodium carbonate (7.5%). The sample was vortex-mixed for 5 seconds and incubated for 30 minutes in the dark, and the absorbance was measured at 760 nm. The results were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) in mg equivalent to gallic acid/g fruit.


### 2.3.3. Total Flavonoid Content

The flavonoids content was estimated by a colorimetric method based on aluminum chloride as reported by Vongsak et al. [22] and expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) in mg equivalent to quercetin/g fruit.


### 2.3.4. Proanthocyanidin Content

The total proanthocyanidin content was estimated using a spectrophotometric method based on acid hydrolysis of the sample with HCl/n-butanol [23, 24], with some modifications. Briefly, 5 mg of phenolic extract was resuspended in 1 mL of methanol. Samples of 0.25 mL were added to 3 mL of n-butanol-HCl (95/5, v/v) in screw-cap tubes. Then, 0.1 mL of NH4Fe(SO4)212 H2O in HCl 2 M (0.2% m/v) was added, and the tubes were incubated for 40 min at 95°C. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and the absorbance measured at 540 nm. A standard curve using cyanidin chloride in methanol (0–10 mg/L) was performed. The results were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) in mg equivalent to cyanidin chloride/100 g fruit.


## 2.3.1. Total Carbohydrate Content

The total carbohydrate content of the phenolic extract was determined by the phenol-sulfuric acid method [20]. Briefly, 1 mL of sample was added to 0.6 mL of phenol (5%) and mixed with 3.6 mL of sulfuric acid. The mixture was cooled for 30 min, and the absorbance was measured at 480 nm. A standard curve using glucose (10–100 mg/L) was generated.


## 2.3.2. Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content of the extracts was estimated as reported by Pastrana-Bonilla et al. [21]. Briefly, 100 μL of extract was mixed with 100 μL of deionized water, 1 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (2 M), and 0.8 mL of sodium carbonate (7.5%). The sample was vortex-mixed for 5 seconds and incubated for 30 minutes in the dark, and the absorbance was measured at 760 nm. The results were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) in mg equivalent to gallic acid/g fruit.


## 2.3.3. Total Flavonoid Content

The flavonoids content was estimated by a colorimetric method based on aluminum chloride as reported by Vongsak et al. [22] and expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) in mg equivalent to quercetin/g fruit.


## 2.3.4. Proanthocyanidin Content

The total proanthocyanidin content was estimated using a spectrophotometric method based on acid hydrolysis of the sample with HCl/n-butanol [23, 24], with some modifications. Briefly, 5 mg of phenolic extract was resuspended in 1 mL of methanol. Samples of 0.25 mL were added to 3 mL of n-butanol-HCl (95/5, v/v) in screw-cap tubes. Then, 0.1 mL of NH4Fe(SO4)212 H2O in HCl 2 M (0.2% m/v) was added, and the tubes were incubated for 40 min at 95°C. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and the absorbance measured at 540 nm. A standard curve using cyanidin chloride in methanol (0–10 mg/L) was performed. The results were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3) in mg equivalent to cyanidin chloride/100 g fruit.


## 2.4. Phenolic Profile Determination

Due to the complexity of the phenolic extracts, three methods were used for the assay and quantification of their chemical constituents.


### 2.4.1. HPLC/UV Analysis

The HPLC/UV analysis of the phenolic profile was performed with acetonitrile and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) as the mobile phase as reported by Martínez-Juarez et al. [25], using an HPLC system with a 20 µL loop and a Spectra System UV-visible optical scanning detector (Thermo Separation Products Inc.) that allows the UV/VIS detection of all solutes eluting from the HPLC column. The detector signals were captured and processed by the PC1000 system software (Thermo Separation Products Inc.).


### 2.4.2. ESI-MS/MS Analysis

MS/MS analysis was performed using a 3200 QTRAP system (Applied Biosystems/MDS, USA). The ionization was performed by electrospray (ESI-MS) with a collision energy of 50 V. The ions were detected in positive mode.


### 2.4.3. Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography (MEKC) Analysis

The analysis was performed as reported by Lee et al. [26] using a P/ACE™ MDQ Capillary Electrophoresis system (Beckman Coulter™) with a photodiode array detector and a fused silica capillary (50 cm effective length and 60 cm total length) with 75 µm ID. The assay conditions were adjusted as required by the standards ((−)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin, and chlorogenic acid) in ethanol. The final conditions for good resolution were as follows: hydrodynamic injection (4 seconds, 0.5 psi), 24 kV for 15 minutes, capillary temperature at 22°C, buffer (28 mM Na2B4O7, 3.2 mM KH2PO4, and 24 mM SDS, pH 8.8), and a resultant current of ∼80 amperes. The spectral data were evaluated from 190 to 360 nm, and the wavelength for integration and quantification was 217 nm.


## 2.4.1. HPLC/UV Analysis

The HPLC/UV analysis of the phenolic profile was performed with acetonitrile and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) as the mobile phase as reported by Martínez-Juarez et al. [25], using an HPLC system with a 20 µL loop and a Spectra System UV-visible optical scanning detector (Thermo Separation Products Inc.) that allows the UV/VIS detection of all solutes eluting from the HPLC column. The detector signals were captured and processed by the PC1000 system software (Thermo Separation Products Inc.).


## 2.4.2. ESI-MS/MS Analysis

MS/MS analysis was performed using a 3200 QTRAP system (Applied Biosystems/MDS, USA). The ionization was performed by electrospray (ESI-MS) with a collision energy of 50 V. The ions were detected in positive mode.


## 2.4.3. Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography (MEKC) Analysis

The analysis was performed as reported by Lee et al. [26] using a P/ACE™ MDQ Capillary Electrophoresis system (Beckman Coulter™) with a photodiode array detector and a fused silica capillary (50 cm effective length and 60 cm total length) with 75 µm ID. The assay conditions were adjusted as required by the standards ((−)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin, and chlorogenic acid) in ethanol. The final conditions for good resolution were as follows: hydrodynamic injection (4 seconds, 0.5 psi), 24 kV for 15 minutes, capillary temperature at 22°C, buffer (28 mM Na2B4O7, 3.2 mM KH2PO4, and 24 mM SDS, pH 8.8), and a resultant current of ∼80 amperes. The spectral data were evaluated from 190 to 360 nm, and the wavelength for integration and quantification was 217 nm.


## 2.5. Antioxidant Activity

### 2.5.1. DPPH Activity

The antioxidant activity of the extracts was evaluated through the DPPH˙ (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging assay as described by Sánchez-Moreno et al. [27]. The reaction was performed using 3.9 mL of DPPH˙ in methanol (0.025 g/L) and 0.1 mL of the phenolic extracts diluted at several concentrations. The absorbance was read at 515 nm. The remaining quantity of DPPH˙ (% remaining DPPH˙) was defined as follows: 100 × (absorbance of the sample/absorbance of the control).


### 2.5.2. Antiradical Efficiency (AE)

The antiradical efficiency (AE) or the trapping capability of free radicals by the phenolic extract was evaluated as suggested by Sánchez-Moreno et al. [27]. The AE was calculated by the mathematical expression 1/(EC50 TEC50). EC50 is the amount of phenolic extract necessary to decrease by 50% the initial DPPH˙ concentration, and it was extrapolated from the curve of the remaining DPPH˙ against the concentrations for each phenolic extract. On the other hand, TEC50 is the reaction time to reach a steady state at the concentration of the phenolic extract corresponding to the EC50 value, and it was determined graphically by plotting the times at the steady state against the concentration for each phenolic extract.


### 2.5.3. Neutralizer Activity Superoxide Radical

The analysis of the trapping capability of the superoxide radical of the phenolic extracts was performed as described by Aruoma et al. [28]. The superoxide radical was generated by using a xanthine-xanthine oxidase as described by McCord and Fridovich [29]. The reaction mixture was as follows: 2 mL of buffer KH2PO4–KOH (100 mM, pH 7.4), 25 µL of xanthine (20 mM), 50 µL of EDTA (0.3 mM), 25 µL of Nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) (3 mM), 100 µL of sample (changeable phenolic concentration), and finally, 75 µL of xanthine oxidase diluted in the above phosphate buffer (1 unit/mL). The absorbance was measured continuously at 560 nm in a closed 1 cm quartz cell at 25°C for 20 minutes. A control sample was prepared using deionized water instead of the phenolic extracts. The trapping activity of the superoxide radical of each phenolic extract was expressed as EC50 and as the inhibition percentage of the NBT reduction (% inhibition) and calculated using the relation: 100 × (absorbance control − absorbance sample)/(absorbance control).


### 2.5.4. Statistical Analyses

For the quantification of polyphenols by MEKC, the data obtained from the calibration curves were adjusted by linear regression with coefficients of variation less than 3% and a value ofR2 greater than 0.9900. Data were plotted using SigmaPlot (version 12.3 Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, California). All experiments were done in triplicate, and the results are reported as the mean ± S.D.


## 2.5.1. DPPH Activity

The antioxidant activity of the extracts was evaluated through the DPPH˙ (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging assay as described by Sánchez-Moreno et al. [27]. The reaction was performed using 3.9 mL of DPPH˙ in methanol (0.025 g/L) and 0.1 mL of the phenolic extracts diluted at several concentrations. The absorbance was read at 515 nm. The remaining quantity of DPPH˙ (% remaining DPPH˙) was defined as follows: 100 × (absorbance of the sample/absorbance of the control).


## 2.5.2. Antiradical Efficiency (AE)

The antiradical efficiency (AE) or the trapping capability of free radicals by the phenolic extract was evaluated as suggested by Sánchez-Moreno et al. [27]. The AE was calculated by the mathematical expression 1/(EC50 TEC50). EC50 is the amount of phenolic extract necessary to decrease by 50% the initial DPPH˙ concentration, and it was extrapolated from the curve of the remaining DPPH˙ against the concentrations for each phenolic extract. On the other hand, TEC50 is the reaction time to reach a steady state at the concentration of the phenolic extract corresponding to the EC50 value, and it was determined graphically by plotting the times at the steady state against the concentration for each phenolic extract.


## 2.5.3. Neutralizer Activity Superoxide Radical

The analysis of the trapping capability of the superoxide radical of the phenolic extracts was performed as described by Aruoma et al. [28]. The superoxide radical was generated by using a xanthine-xanthine oxidase as described by McCord and Fridovich [29]. The reaction mixture was as follows: 2 mL of buffer KH2PO4–KOH (100 mM, pH 7.4), 25 µL of xanthine (20 mM), 50 µL of EDTA (0.3 mM), 25 µL of Nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) (3 mM), 100 µL of sample (changeable phenolic concentration), and finally, 75 µL of xanthine oxidase diluted in the above phosphate buffer (1 unit/mL). The absorbance was measured continuously at 560 nm in a closed 1 cm quartz cell at 25°C for 20 minutes. A control sample was prepared using deionized water instead of the phenolic extracts. The trapping activity of the superoxide radical of each phenolic extract was expressed as EC50 and as the inhibition percentage of the NBT reduction (% inhibition) and calculated using the relation: 100 × (absorbance control − absorbance sample)/(absorbance control).


## 2.5.4. Statistical Analyses

For the quantification of polyphenols by MEKC, the data obtained from the calibration curves were adjusted by linear regression with coefficients of variation less than 3% and a value ofR2 greater than 0.9900. Data were plotted using SigmaPlot (version 12.3 Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, California). All experiments were done in triplicate, and the results are reported as the mean ± S.D.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization of the Phenolic Extract

Since quality, yield, and chemical composition of plant extracts depends on the plant material and the extraction processes, the phenolic extracts from the freeze-dried fruits of tejocote (C. pubescens) were phytochemically characterized for their purity and phenolic profile before investigation of their antioxidant activity (Table 1). Due to the polarity of the solvents used, the carbohydrate content and the phenolic profiles were used as quality and integrity criteria of the extract as suggested by Dai and Mumper [19]. The content of total carbohydrates in the phenolic extracts was 69.8% ± 1.61%, which agrees with reports from the literature showing that this method can simultaneously extract carbohydrates, terpene, and polyphenolic compounds from freeze-dried plant biomass [18, 19]. However, when the extracts are from air-dried biomass, the yield of phenolics is usually lower, and further, the natural phenolic profile may change by side reactions during the drying and extraction processes [19, 30, 31]. On the other hand, the total phenolic content in the extract was 168.6 ± 0.9 mg gallic acid equivalent/g dry fruit, which is higher than the value reported for callus tissue of Crataegus monogyna (58.9 mg gallic acid equivalent/g dry fruit) by Bahorun et al. [32] and for fruits of Crataegus pinnatifida (42.89 mg gallic acid equivalent/g dry fruit) by Cai et al. [33]. However, it is also important to note that the Folin–Ciocalteu method is not an absolute measurement of the amount of phenolic compounds since other substances such as organic acids, sugars, amino acids, proteins, and other compounds present in the extracts may interfere with this assay [34]. Of phenolic compounds, flavonoids have been reported as the most important and principal compounds responsible for the major pharmacological activities of the Crataegus species [35]. For example, Swaminathan et al. [36] reported a cardioprotective and antiradical effect of phenolic extracts from Crataegus oxycantha fruits. In the present study, the total content of flavonoids in the phenolic extract from tejocote (C. pubescens) fruits was 55.89 ± 0.11 mg equivalents quercetin/g dry fruit (Table 1). This value is within the reported range for other Crataegus species, such as Crataegus scabrifolia (84 mg/g) and C. pinnatifida (31 mg/g) by Gao et al. [37], and higher than that reported by Froehlicher et al. [38] for C. monogyna (1.47 mg/g).Table 1
Phytochemical characterization and content of free polyphenolic compounds inCrataegus pubescens fruits.
Group/compound
Concentration
Total carbohydrates (g/100 g extract)
69.8 ± 1.61
Total phenolics (mg gallic acid equivalent/g fruit dry)
168.6 ± 0.9
Total flavonoids (mg equivalents quercetin/g dry fruit)
55.89 ± 0.11
Proanthocyanidins (mg cyanidin/100 g dry fruit)
84.57 ± 1.43
(−)-Epicatechin (mg/100 mg dry fruit)
4.32 ± 0.11
(+)-Catechin (mg/100 mg dry fruit)
9.17 ± 0.20
Chlorogenic acid (mg/100 mg dry fruit)
5.60 ± 0.24
The response factor for estimation of the phenolic content was from the calibration curve using MEKC. The results are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 3).Proanthocyanidins are another group of plant phenolic compounds with antioxidant and pharmaceutical properties. The total content of these compounds in the phenolic extracts of tejocote (C. pubescens) fruits was 84.57 ± 1.43 mg cyanidin/100 g dry fruit (Table 1). This content is comparable to that reported by Froehlicher et al. [38] for C. monogyna fruits (108.7 ± 9.2 mg/100 g) and higher than that reported for edible fruits from other plant species [39] such as apple (17–50 mg/100 g) and grape (1–160 mg/100 g). Proanthocyanidins belong to a flavonoid subgroup containing a flavan-3-ol unit, epicatechin, and/or catechin [40], which have been reported to have beneficial effects for the endothelium blood vessels by inhibiting endothelin-1 release and improving the blood circulation [41]; consequently, they are considered as the phenolic compounds responsible for Crataegus species to be used for treatment of diseases such as heart failure [42].The characterization of the extract ofC. pubescens showed the presence of several phytochemicals that in several scientific studies are correlated with diverse biological and pharmacological effects of several species of Crataegus. For example, C. monogyna has a long history as a medicinal plant used to treat kidney stones, digestive ailments, dyspnea, and cardiovascular disorders and is currently being used for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases [4]. These results demonstrate the potential of tejocote (C. pubescens) over other Crataegus species with a smaller content of flavonoids already used for therapeutic purposes [35, 36].


### 3.2. Phenolic Profile

The major free phenolic compounds identified by both HPLC and MEKC in the phenolic extract from tejocote (C. pubescens) fruits were (−)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin, and chlorogenic acid (Figure 1). These results show that MEKC is an alternative technique for analysis of phenolic compounds. These compounds were confirmed by comparing their migration time or retention time with respect to the corresponding standards. The estimation of the quantitative data is performed on the basis of the integration of the areas of the peaks using the software of the instrument. Figure 1(a) shows the electropherogram of the tejocote extract. Table 1 shows the content of (−)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin, and chlorogenic acid in the tejocote (C. pubescens) fruits. Likewise, the UV spectra (Figure 1(c)) revealed the presence of compounds that are similar to the absorption spectra of (−)-epicatechin and (+)-catechin. This observation shows that the detected molecules might be oligomers of such compounds, known as procyanidins, which agrees with reports in the literature for polyphenols in extracts from flowers [43] and cell suspensions, fresh fruits, and medicinal dried parts of this plant species [38]. Further, to confirm the presence of these compounds in the phenolic extracts, a mass analysis (MS/MS) was carried out. Six HPLC peaks were collected (Figure 1(b)) and analyzed by MS/MS using a mass spectrometer. Ions for a procyanidin dimer (m/z 579.1), a procyanidin trimer (m/z 867.2), and a procyanidin tetramer (m/z 1153.2) were detected and positively identified by MS/MS fragmentation (Figure 2). The presence of these compounds is congruent with the antioxidant activity shown by extracts of tejocote (C. pubescens) in the presence of the superoxide radical and DPPH, since the phenolic compounds, especially procyanidins and flavonoids, are the principal bioactive compounds in Crataegus fruits [2]. This result demonstrates the nutraceutical potential of C. pubescens fruits. Some authors [44] reported a hypoglycemic effect of C. pubescens root extracts in the presence of flavonoids (gallocatechin gallate and quercetin) and phenolic acids (ferulic acid and coumaric acid). Although the compounds reported in the root are not the same as those in the fruit (present study), it is important to mention that flavan-3-ol (catechin and epicatechin) has a strong antioxidant potential [45] and has antimutagenic, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antiviral properties. Therefore, due to the presence of (−)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin, and chlorogenic acid identified in the phenolic extract of tejocote (C. pubescens) by both HPLC and MEKC, tejocote fruits or its pulp extracts could be used as a new ingredient for the elaboration of functional foods or as a nutraceutical.Figure 1
Electropherogram 217 nm (a) and HPLC 230 nm chromatogram (b) of a phenolic extract ofCrataegus pubescens fruits. The spectral pattern and identity of the major compounds are shown in (c); 1. (−)-epicatechin; 2. (+)-catechin; 3. procyanidin dimer; 4. procyanidin trimer; 5. procyanidin tetramer; 6. chlorogenic acid. Calibration curves were linear for both methods for concentration between 10 and 160 µM for (−)-epicatechin and (+)-catechin, with correlation coefficients of 0.9901 and 0.9959, respectively, and in a range of 10–240 µM with a correlation coefficient of 0.9976 for chlorogenic acid. The electropherogram with the resolved standards is presented (inset) in (a).
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 2
Fragmentation ions MS/MS in positive mode of procyanidins detected inCrataegus pubescens extracts. (a) Procyanidin dimer (m/z 579.1); (b) procyanidin trimer (m/z 867.2); (c) procyanidin tetramer (m/z 1153.2).
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.3. Antioxidant Activity DPPH

Trolox™ and quercetin were used for the determination of antioxidant activity of the phenolic extracts (Figure3 and Table 2) as a reference, since Trolox is the reference antioxidant used in most studies of antioxidant activity, mainly when it is expressed in EC50 [46, 47], owing to its structural analogy with vitamin E. However, Trolox is a synthetic compound, whereas quercetin is a natural flavonoid extensively found in plants and is recognized as a potent antioxidant.Figure 3
Percentage of remnant DPPH against the standard concentration was plotted in an exponential regression to obtain the amount of antioxidant necessary to decrease the initial DPPH concentration by 50% (EC50) and the time needed to reach the steady state for EC50 (TEC50). The results are shown as the mean ± SD (n=3).Table 2
Antioxidant activity through the DPPH radical.
Sample
Concentration (µg/mL)
% inhibition DPPH
EC50 (µg/mL)
TEC50
AE
Extract tejocote fruits
300
20.5
1472.27
36
1.88 × 10−5
600
32.4
900
41.6
1200
49.1
1500
50.3
1800
51.5
Trolox
120
41.4
154.19
1.33
4.87 × 10−3
140
46.2
160
51.1
180
56.4
200
62.5
Quercetin
20
14.8
55.48
14.03
1.28 × 10−3
40
38.7
60
56.3
80
74.8
100
85.4
EC50: amount of antioxidant necessary to decrease the initial DPPH concentration by 50%; TEC50: time required to reach the steady state for EC50; EA: antiradical efficiency, where AE = 1/EC50·TEC50. The results are shown as the mean (n=3).The EC50 value for the phenolic extract (1472.27 µg/mL) was higher than that for Trolox or quercetin (Table 2), indicating that more of the extract is required than that with Trolox or quercetin. This result might be explained due to the purity of the extract, which was used without any purification and has a high content of carbohydrates (69.8%). Similarly, a DPPH capability of inhibition dependent on the concentration was found (Figure 3). When the sample concentration ranged between 300 and 1800 µg/mL, the inhibition percentage of the DPPH radical varied from 20.5% to 51.5%, and the EC50 of 1.47 mg/mL reduced the DPPH radical concentration by 50%. It is known that antioxidant activity is the result of the synergistic and antagonistic effects of the interactions of different compounds [47]. It has been suggested that antioxidants could prevent many chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases [10]. In the present study, the presence of biologically active compounds such as flavonoids in the extract of C. pubescens suggests that they can capture free radicals and confer antioxidant activity, demonstrating the nutraceutical potential of this fruit. Likewise, it was observed that antioxidant efficiency (AE) is a discriminating parameter between among samples. Regarding the phenolic extracts, the order of AE was Trolox > quercetin > tejocote extract (C. pubescens).


### 3.4. Superoxide Trapping Activity

The inhibition capability of the superoxide radical is important because in addition to the hydroxyl radical, they are the main reactive oxygen species (ROS) continuously generated in normal body metabolism, particularly through the mitochondrial energy production pathway. Control of ROS production is fundamental to avoid oxidative stress, which is implicated in the incidence and progression of several disease conditions [48]. Figure 4 shows the inhibitory relationship of the superoxide radical dependent on the phenolic extract. When the extract concentrations ranged between 200 and 1000 µg/mL, the inhibition percentage of the superoxide radical ranged from 19.5% to 61.7%. These results are comparable with those of other Crataegus species, such as Crataegus aronia [49], that are used for medicinal purposes, whose aqueous extracts inhibit the formation of the superoxide radical (82%) with concentrations between 500 and 1000 µg/mL. It has also been reported that the concentration of the superoxide radical decreases by more than 50% in a 500 µg/mL concentration of ethanolic extract from Crataegus oxycantha [36]. Thus, the results from the present work suggest that the phenolic extract from tejocote (C. pubescens) is able to trap superoxide radicals.Figure 4
Effect of different concentrations of extracts from tejocote on the inhibition of superoxide radical generated by the xanthine-xanthine oxidase system. The results are shown as the mean ± SD (n=3).


## 3.1. Characterization of the Phenolic Extract

Since quality, yield, and chemical composition of plant extracts depends on the plant material and the extraction processes, the phenolic extracts from the freeze-dried fruits of tejocote (C. pubescens) were phytochemically characterized for their purity and phenolic profile before investigation of their antioxidant activity (Table 1). Due to the polarity of the solvents used, the carbohydrate content and the phenolic profiles were used as quality and integrity criteria of the extract as suggested by Dai and Mumper [19]. The content of total carbohydrates in the phenolic extracts was 69.8% ± 1.61%, which agrees with reports from the literature showing that this method can simultaneously extract carbohydrates, terpene, and polyphenolic compounds from freeze-dried plant biomass [18, 19]. However, when the extracts are from air-dried biomass, the yield of phenolics is usually lower, and further, the natural phenolic profile may change by side reactions during the drying and extraction processes [19, 30, 31]. On the other hand, the total phenolic content in the extract was 168.6 ± 0.9 mg gallic acid equivalent/g dry fruit, which is higher than the value reported for callus tissue of Crataegus monogyna (58.9 mg gallic acid equivalent/g dry fruit) by Bahorun et al. [32] and for fruits of Crataegus pinnatifida (42.89 mg gallic acid equivalent/g dry fruit) by Cai et al. [33]. However, it is also important to note that the Folin–Ciocalteu method is not an absolute measurement of the amount of phenolic compounds since other substances such as organic acids, sugars, amino acids, proteins, and other compounds present in the extracts may interfere with this assay [34]. Of phenolic compounds, flavonoids have been reported as the most important and principal compounds responsible for the major pharmacological activities of the Crataegus species [35]. For example, Swaminathan et al. [36] reported a cardioprotective and antiradical effect of phenolic extracts from Crataegus oxycantha fruits. In the present study, the total content of flavonoids in the phenolic extract from tejocote (C. pubescens) fruits was 55.89 ± 0.11 mg equivalents quercetin/g dry fruit (Table 1). This value is within the reported range for other Crataegus species, such as Crataegus scabrifolia (84 mg/g) and C. pinnatifida (31 mg/g) by Gao et al. [37], and higher than that reported by Froehlicher et al. [38] for C. monogyna (1.47 mg/g).Table 1
Phytochemical characterization and content of free polyphenolic compounds inCrataegus pubescens fruits.
Group/compound
Concentration
Total carbohydrates (g/100 g extract)
69.8 ± 1.61
Total phenolics (mg gallic acid equivalent/g fruit dry)
168.6 ± 0.9
Total flavonoids (mg equivalents quercetin/g dry fruit)
55.89 ± 0.11
Proanthocyanidins (mg cyanidin/100 g dry fruit)
84.57 ± 1.43
(−)-Epicatechin (mg/100 mg dry fruit)
4.32 ± 0.11
(+)-Catechin (mg/100 mg dry fruit)
9.17 ± 0.20
Chlorogenic acid (mg/100 mg dry fruit)
5.60 ± 0.24
The response factor for estimation of the phenolic content was from the calibration curve using MEKC. The results are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 3).Proanthocyanidins are another group of plant phenolic compounds with antioxidant and pharmaceutical properties. The total content of these compounds in the phenolic extracts of tejocote (C. pubescens) fruits was 84.57 ± 1.43 mg cyanidin/100 g dry fruit (Table 1). This content is comparable to that reported by Froehlicher et al. [38] for C. monogyna fruits (108.7 ± 9.2 mg/100 g) and higher than that reported for edible fruits from other plant species [39] such as apple (17–50 mg/100 g) and grape (1–160 mg/100 g). Proanthocyanidins belong to a flavonoid subgroup containing a flavan-3-ol unit, epicatechin, and/or catechin [40], which have been reported to have beneficial effects for the endothelium blood vessels by inhibiting endothelin-1 release and improving the blood circulation [41]; consequently, they are considered as the phenolic compounds responsible for Crataegus species to be used for treatment of diseases such as heart failure [42].The characterization of the extract ofC. pubescens showed the presence of several phytochemicals that in several scientific studies are correlated with diverse biological and pharmacological effects of several species of Crataegus. For example, C. monogyna has a long history as a medicinal plant used to treat kidney stones, digestive ailments, dyspnea, and cardiovascular disorders and is currently being used for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases [4]. These results demonstrate the potential of tejocote (C. pubescens) over other Crataegus species with a smaller content of flavonoids already used for therapeutic purposes [35, 36].


## 3.2. Phenolic Profile

The major free phenolic compounds identified by both HPLC and MEKC in the phenolic extract from tejocote (C. pubescens) fruits were (−)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin, and chlorogenic acid (Figure 1). These results show that MEKC is an alternative technique for analysis of phenolic compounds. These compounds were confirmed by comparing their migration time or retention time with respect to the corresponding standards. The estimation of the quantitative data is performed on the basis of the integration of the areas of the peaks using the software of the instrument. Figure 1(a) shows the electropherogram of the tejocote extract. Table 1 shows the content of (−)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin, and chlorogenic acid in the tejocote (C. pubescens) fruits. Likewise, the UV spectra (Figure 1(c)) revealed the presence of compounds that are similar to the absorption spectra of (−)-epicatechin and (+)-catechin. This observation shows that the detected molecules might be oligomers of such compounds, known as procyanidins, which agrees with reports in the literature for polyphenols in extracts from flowers [43] and cell suspensions, fresh fruits, and medicinal dried parts of this plant species [38]. Further, to confirm the presence of these compounds in the phenolic extracts, a mass analysis (MS/MS) was carried out. Six HPLC peaks were collected (Figure 1(b)) and analyzed by MS/MS using a mass spectrometer. Ions for a procyanidin dimer (m/z 579.1), a procyanidin trimer (m/z 867.2), and a procyanidin tetramer (m/z 1153.2) were detected and positively identified by MS/MS fragmentation (Figure 2). The presence of these compounds is congruent with the antioxidant activity shown by extracts of tejocote (C. pubescens) in the presence of the superoxide radical and DPPH, since the phenolic compounds, especially procyanidins and flavonoids, are the principal bioactive compounds in Crataegus fruits [2]. This result demonstrates the nutraceutical potential of C. pubescens fruits. Some authors [44] reported a hypoglycemic effect of C. pubescens root extracts in the presence of flavonoids (gallocatechin gallate and quercetin) and phenolic acids (ferulic acid and coumaric acid). Although the compounds reported in the root are not the same as those in the fruit (present study), it is important to mention that flavan-3-ol (catechin and epicatechin) has a strong antioxidant potential [45] and has antimutagenic, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antiviral properties. Therefore, due to the presence of (−)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin, and chlorogenic acid identified in the phenolic extract of tejocote (C. pubescens) by both HPLC and MEKC, tejocote fruits or its pulp extracts could be used as a new ingredient for the elaboration of functional foods or as a nutraceutical.Figure 1
Electropherogram 217 nm (a) and HPLC 230 nm chromatogram (b) of a phenolic extract ofCrataegus pubescens fruits. The spectral pattern and identity of the major compounds are shown in (c); 1. (−)-epicatechin; 2. (+)-catechin; 3. procyanidin dimer; 4. procyanidin trimer; 5. procyanidin tetramer; 6. chlorogenic acid. Calibration curves were linear for both methods for concentration between 10 and 160 µM for (−)-epicatechin and (+)-catechin, with correlation coefficients of 0.9901 and 0.9959, respectively, and in a range of 10–240 µM with a correlation coefficient of 0.9976 for chlorogenic acid. The electropherogram with the resolved standards is presented (inset) in (a).
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 2
Fragmentation ions MS/MS in positive mode of procyanidins detected inCrataegus pubescens extracts. (a) Procyanidin dimer (m/z 579.1); (b) procyanidin trimer (m/z 867.2); (c) procyanidin tetramer (m/z 1153.2).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.3. Antioxidant Activity DPPH

Trolox™ and quercetin were used for the determination of antioxidant activity of the phenolic extracts (Figure3 and Table 2) as a reference, since Trolox is the reference antioxidant used in most studies of antioxidant activity, mainly when it is expressed in EC50 [46, 47], owing to its structural analogy with vitamin E. However, Trolox is a synthetic compound, whereas quercetin is a natural flavonoid extensively found in plants and is recognized as a potent antioxidant.Figure 3
Percentage of remnant DPPH against the standard concentration was plotted in an exponential regression to obtain the amount of antioxidant necessary to decrease the initial DPPH concentration by 50% (EC50) and the time needed to reach the steady state for EC50 (TEC50). The results are shown as the mean ± SD (n=3).Table 2
Antioxidant activity through the DPPH radical.
Sample
Concentration (µg/mL)
% inhibition DPPH
EC50 (µg/mL)
TEC50
AE
Extract tejocote fruits
300
20.5
1472.27
36
1.88 × 10−5
600
32.4
900
41.6
1200
49.1
1500
50.3
1800
51.5
Trolox
120
41.4
154.19
1.33
4.87 × 10−3
140
46.2
160
51.1
180
56.4
200
62.5
Quercetin
20
14.8
55.48
14.03
1.28 × 10−3
40
38.7
60
56.3
80
74.8
100
85.4
EC50: amount of antioxidant necessary to decrease the initial DPPH concentration by 50%; TEC50: time required to reach the steady state for EC50; EA: antiradical efficiency, where AE = 1/EC50·TEC50. The results are shown as the mean (n=3).The EC50 value for the phenolic extract (1472.27 µg/mL) was higher than that for Trolox or quercetin (Table 2), indicating that more of the extract is required than that with Trolox or quercetin. This result might be explained due to the purity of the extract, which was used without any purification and has a high content of carbohydrates (69.8%). Similarly, a DPPH capability of inhibition dependent on the concentration was found (Figure 3). When the sample concentration ranged between 300 and 1800 µg/mL, the inhibition percentage of the DPPH radical varied from 20.5% to 51.5%, and the EC50 of 1.47 mg/mL reduced the DPPH radical concentration by 50%. It is known that antioxidant activity is the result of the synergistic and antagonistic effects of the interactions of different compounds [47]. It has been suggested that antioxidants could prevent many chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases [10]. In the present study, the presence of biologically active compounds such as flavonoids in the extract of C. pubescens suggests that they can capture free radicals and confer antioxidant activity, demonstrating the nutraceutical potential of this fruit. Likewise, it was observed that antioxidant efficiency (AE) is a discriminating parameter between among samples. Regarding the phenolic extracts, the order of AE was Trolox > quercetin > tejocote extract (C. pubescens).


## 3.4. Superoxide Trapping Activity

The inhibition capability of the superoxide radical is important because in addition to the hydroxyl radical, they are the main reactive oxygen species (ROS) continuously generated in normal body metabolism, particularly through the mitochondrial energy production pathway. Control of ROS production is fundamental to avoid oxidative stress, which is implicated in the incidence and progression of several disease conditions [48]. Figure 4 shows the inhibitory relationship of the superoxide radical dependent on the phenolic extract. When the extract concentrations ranged between 200 and 1000 µg/mL, the inhibition percentage of the superoxide radical ranged from 19.5% to 61.7%. These results are comparable with those of other Crataegus species, such as Crataegus aronia [49], that are used for medicinal purposes, whose aqueous extracts inhibit the formation of the superoxide radical (82%) with concentrations between 500 and 1000 µg/mL. It has also been reported that the concentration of the superoxide radical decreases by more than 50% in a 500 µg/mL concentration of ethanolic extract from Crataegus oxycantha [36]. Thus, the results from the present work suggest that the phenolic extract from tejocote (C. pubescens) is able to trap superoxide radicals.Figure 4
Effect of different concentrations of extracts from tejocote on the inhibition of superoxide radical generated by the xanthine-xanthine oxidase system. The results are shown as the mean ± SD (n=3).


## 4. Conclusions

This is the first study to report the presence of (−)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin, chlorogenic acid, and procyanidins represented in dimers, trimers, and tetramers in the tejocote (Crataegus pubescens) fruits in important concentrations in order to consider such fruit as a potential source of extraction of such polyphenols to be used in the food or nutraceutical industries. Tejocote is of interest because of these antioxidant activities, and the trapping capability of free radicals is comparable to that of other Crataegus species that are used for therapeutic purposes. Likewise, micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) proved to be an alternative to the use of HPLC for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of phenolic compounds in tejocote (C. pubescens). The time and use of reagents were reduced, and the resolution of the analyzed compounds was not affected. This result demonstrates that tejocote (C. pubescens) could be considered as a potential new ingredient for the elaboration of functional foods or nutraceuticals due to the presence of antioxidants.



---

*Source: 2154893-2018-07-25.xml*