# Physicomechanical Assessments and Heavy Metals’ Leaching Potential of Modified Asphalt Binders Incorporating Crumb Rubber and Tin Slag Powders

Authors: Ali Huddin Ibrahim; Mohd Rosli Mohd Hasan; Ashiru Sani; Sharvin Poovaneshvaran; Tracy Leh Xin Wong; Megat Azmi Megat Johari; Kok Keong Choong; Ramadhansyah Putra Jaya
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Industrial solid waste has been widely used as an alternative additive for bituminous material modification. This study aims to evaluate the basic properties and quantify the leaching potential of modified asphalt binders incorporating crumb rubber powder (CRP) from waste tires and tin slag (TS) for a local smelting company. Three percentages of CRP and TS, at 5, 10, and 15%, were considered. The conventional asphalt binder (PEN 60/70), CRP, and TS-based modified asphalt binders were analyzed for toxicity, softening point, penetration value, elastic recovery, torsional recovery (TR), and coatability index. The findings indicated that the addition of the waste materials led to no significant heavy metal content in the asphalt binder mix. Moreover, the basic and physical properties of the asphalt binders were also improved by 5, 10, and 15% of the waste, respectively. However, TS waste exhibited limited effects on all the parameters and had a 5% optimum dosage. The modified binders’ results showed that the CRP modified asphalt binders had fewer heavy metals and responded more to elastic recovery and coatability.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In Malaysia, the escalated usage of vehicles on roads generates a huge amount of waste tires at the end of their life cycle [1]. Up to mid-2017, there were 28,181,203 units of vehicles registered, as reported by the Malaysia Automotive Association (MAA) [2]. As a developing country, the huge increase in the generation of scrap tires is alarming. The disposal of waste tires poses a major environmental problem, as they have a long lifespan and possess nonbiodegradable properties. Disposal of waste tires is a challenging task as it will lead to scarcity of landfills capacity due to its large quantity [2, 3]. This issue can be overcome by recycling scrap tires to protect the environment from pollution [4, 5]. Since the last few decades, recycled waste tires are being utilized as a modifier in asphalt paving mixtures, additives in Portland cement concrete, and lightweight fillers. In addition, the tires can also serve as the crash barrier, a bumper, and an artificial reef [3, 6, 7]. The utilization of waste tires is effective in overcoming the issue associated with solid scrap tire disposal, and the recycled tires such as crumb rubber can act as a good modifier for enhancing the properties and performance of asphaltic concrete [2, 8, 9]. The utilization of polymer-modified bitumen is a cost-effective and efficient alternative to improve the performance of asphalt pavements [10, 11].Vehicle tire shreds are usually found in the range of 460 mm to 25 mm, and thus, the small sizes of shred and chip eased the production of ground crumb rubber [12]. The wire and other metal contaminants are removed [12–14]. The applications of crumb rubber in asphalt paving mixtures are known as rubber asphalt in the USA. It consists of asphalt cement, reclaimed tire rubber, and additives. According to the reports, approximately 15% of the rubber components are integrated into the rubber asphalt blend. During the blending process, grounded rubber particles were mixed with hot asphalt cement, resulting in swelling of the rubber particles [15]. The particles size of CRP influenced the physical properties of modified binders. Studies reported that the particle size of crumb rubber, which is subjected to high temperature, was an influential factor in viscoelastic properties [16, 17].On the other hand, tin slag is formed through the smelting process of tin. Recently, a company from Penang managed to produce 27,172 tonnes of tin metal, thus making Penang the largest tin producer in Malaysia. Malaysia is known as the third-largest tin metal supplier globally, leading in the production of tin metal and tin-based products, as well as custom tin smelting [18]. Cassiterite is reduced to form tin metal with carbon at a very high temperature (1200°C to 1300°C). Currently, the lack of commercial application of tin slag and its unsuitability for disposal in landfills has resulted in the accumulation of a large quantity of waste that poses a disposal concern for smelting plant companies. The TS generally consists of SiO2, Al2O3, CaO, Fe2O3, and TiO2. The elements such as Pb, Cr, and Mn in TS tend to be soluble in an acid environment [19]. With stringent environmental restrictions by the government and local authorities, treatment, and disposal issues for scheduled waste are getting more attention from manufacturers or industry authorities. Along with this, an alternative approach such as reusing or recycling industrial waste or by-products has been considered. The outcome of previous research shows that those products are feasible to be used in road pavement construction as binder modifiers with and without additives [20–24].However, incorporating various industrial wastes into asphalt binders has compelled me to conduct related studies to ascertain that the heavy metals are present in the CRP and TS modified binders. The studies are to ensure its environmental sustainability through the use of asphalt pavement technology. This study is also partially intended to examine the basic and physical characteristics of CRP and TS modified binders. Therefore, this study mainly aims to evaluate the possibility of adding different industrial wastes (CRP and TS) as additives to bituminous materials.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

The physical properties of conventional asphalt binder (PEN 60/70) used for the sample preparation in this study are shown in Table1. The dosages of industrial waste that are used to modify asphalt binders, namely, crumb rubber powder (CRP) and tin slag (TS), are provided in Table 2. The CRP and TS industrial waste adopted were supplied by Malaysia’s Pan Century Oleochemicals Sdn Bhd. and Penang’s Malaysia Smelting Corporation Berhad (MSC). The physical appearance of the CRP is shown in Figure 1(a). The CRP is a processed waste tire, in which the size of the tire is reduced by grounding it into smaller particles. The distribution of particle size for both the CRP and TS is shown in Figure 2. TS was initially dried in an oven at 105 ± 5°C for 24 hours and then grounded for 8 hours to obtain finer particles using a laboratory scale ball mill. The tin slag went through a 75 μm sieve to remove coarser particles, as shown in Figure 1(b). The tin slag chemical composition is shown in Table 3 [25]. All samples were prepared using a liquid antistripping agent at 0.1% Silane additive based on the binder weight.Table 1
The bitumen properties.
Physical propertiesResultsTorsional recovery0.5%Softening point50°CElastic recovery83%Penetration65 dmmFlash point273°CTable 2
Percentages of additives used.
Types of additivesDesignationDosages (%)Sample designationCrumb rubber powderCRP55% CRP1010% CRP1515% CRPTin slagTS55% TS1010% TS1515% TSFigure 1
Physical appearance of industrial waste powders. (a) Crumb rubber powder. (b) Tin slag.
(a)(b)Figure 2
Particle size distribution of crumb rubber powder (CRP) and tin slag (TS).Table 3
Chemical composition of tin slag.
CaO (%)SiO2 (%)Al2O3 (%)MgO (%)FeO/Fe2O3 (%)WO (%)As (%)Pb (%)Cd (%)TiO2 (%)Sn (%)Zn (%)16–2028–3210–132–413–1820<0.01<0.01<0.00014–6<0.3<0.14


### 2.2. Preparation of Samples

#### 2.2.1. Preparation of the Sample for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) Test

Initially, the asphalt binder in galvanized iron containers was preheated at 160°C for 1 hour. Besides that, modified binders with different dosages (5%, 10%, and 15%) of CRP and TS were also prepared to compare the impact of various dosages on the quantity of detected heavy metals. Before testing, the preheated modified binder in each galvanized iron container was manually stirred for 1 minute to improve its consistency. Then, the sample was poured into a container and cooled to room temperature for 1 hour prior to the test. The toxicity of the conventional and modified asphalt binders was tested according to US EPA Method 1311, Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) [26] by using the water from the purification system (Figure 3(a)) and an automatic rotary agitator as shown in Figure 3(b).Figure 3
TCLP test assembly. (a) Water purification machine. (b) Automatic rotary agitator.
(a)(b)


#### 2.2.2. Preparation of the Sample for the Physical Property Tests

The TS and CRP modified binders were prepared using three dosages at 5%, 10%, and 15% by weight of asphalt binder. The incorporation of waste materials (TS that was passing 75μm or CRP passing 1 mm) was incorporated in the binder via a wet process. Firstly, the conventional asphalt binder was preheated at a temperature of 160°C before blending. After that, the waste materials were incorporated into the binder for 30 minutes at a temperature of 160°C in a high-shear mixer. The waste materials were added gently into the binder to avoid clumping to produce a homogenous modified binder. The mixing speed of the high-shear mixer to blend the waste material and binder was set at 1000 rpm.


## 2.1. Materials

The physical properties of conventional asphalt binder (PEN 60/70) used for the sample preparation in this study are shown in Table1. The dosages of industrial waste that are used to modify asphalt binders, namely, crumb rubber powder (CRP) and tin slag (TS), are provided in Table 2. The CRP and TS industrial waste adopted were supplied by Malaysia’s Pan Century Oleochemicals Sdn Bhd. and Penang’s Malaysia Smelting Corporation Berhad (MSC). The physical appearance of the CRP is shown in Figure 1(a). The CRP is a processed waste tire, in which the size of the tire is reduced by grounding it into smaller particles. The distribution of particle size for both the CRP and TS is shown in Figure 2. TS was initially dried in an oven at 105 ± 5°C for 24 hours and then grounded for 8 hours to obtain finer particles using a laboratory scale ball mill. The tin slag went through a 75 μm sieve to remove coarser particles, as shown in Figure 1(b). The tin slag chemical composition is shown in Table 3 [25]. All samples were prepared using a liquid antistripping agent at 0.1% Silane additive based on the binder weight.Table 1
The bitumen properties.
Physical propertiesResultsTorsional recovery0.5%Softening point50°CElastic recovery83%Penetration65 dmmFlash point273°CTable 2
Percentages of additives used.
Types of additivesDesignationDosages (%)Sample designationCrumb rubber powderCRP55% CRP1010% CRP1515% CRPTin slagTS55% TS1010% TS1515% TSFigure 1
Physical appearance of industrial waste powders. (a) Crumb rubber powder. (b) Tin slag.
(a)(b)Figure 2
Particle size distribution of crumb rubber powder (CRP) and tin slag (TS).Table 3
Chemical composition of tin slag.
CaO (%)SiO2 (%)Al2O3 (%)MgO (%)FeO/Fe2O3 (%)WO (%)As (%)Pb (%)Cd (%)TiO2 (%)Sn (%)Zn (%)16–2028–3210–132–413–1820<0.01<0.01<0.00014–6<0.3<0.14


## 2.2. Preparation of Samples

### 2.2.1. Preparation of the Sample for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) Test

Initially, the asphalt binder in galvanized iron containers was preheated at 160°C for 1 hour. Besides that, modified binders with different dosages (5%, 10%, and 15%) of CRP and TS were also prepared to compare the impact of various dosages on the quantity of detected heavy metals. Before testing, the preheated modified binder in each galvanized iron container was manually stirred for 1 minute to improve its consistency. Then, the sample was poured into a container and cooled to room temperature for 1 hour prior to the test. The toxicity of the conventional and modified asphalt binders was tested according to US EPA Method 1311, Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) [26] by using the water from the purification system (Figure 3(a)) and an automatic rotary agitator as shown in Figure 3(b).Figure 3
TCLP test assembly. (a) Water purification machine. (b) Automatic rotary agitator.
(a)(b)


### 2.2.2. Preparation of the Sample for the Physical Property Tests

The TS and CRP modified binders were prepared using three dosages at 5%, 10%, and 15% by weight of asphalt binder. The incorporation of waste materials (TS that was passing 75μm or CRP passing 1 mm) was incorporated in the binder via a wet process. Firstly, the conventional asphalt binder was preheated at a temperature of 160°C before blending. After that, the waste materials were incorporated into the binder for 30 minutes at a temperature of 160°C in a high-shear mixer. The waste materials were added gently into the binder to avoid clumping to produce a homogenous modified binder. The mixing speed of the high-shear mixer to blend the waste material and binder was set at 1000 rpm.


## 2.2.1. Preparation of the Sample for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) Test

Initially, the asphalt binder in galvanized iron containers was preheated at 160°C for 1 hour. Besides that, modified binders with different dosages (5%, 10%, and 15%) of CRP and TS were also prepared to compare the impact of various dosages on the quantity of detected heavy metals. Before testing, the preheated modified binder in each galvanized iron container was manually stirred for 1 minute to improve its consistency. Then, the sample was poured into a container and cooled to room temperature for 1 hour prior to the test. The toxicity of the conventional and modified asphalt binders was tested according to US EPA Method 1311, Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) [26] by using the water from the purification system (Figure 3(a)) and an automatic rotary agitator as shown in Figure 3(b).Figure 3
TCLP test assembly. (a) Water purification machine. (b) Automatic rotary agitator.
(a)(b)


## 2.2.2. Preparation of the Sample for the Physical Property Tests

The TS and CRP modified binders were prepared using three dosages at 5%, 10%, and 15% by weight of asphalt binder. The incorporation of waste materials (TS that was passing 75μm or CRP passing 1 mm) was incorporated in the binder via a wet process. Firstly, the conventional asphalt binder was preheated at a temperature of 160°C before blending. After that, the waste materials were incorporated into the binder for 30 minutes at a temperature of 160°C in a high-shear mixer. The waste materials were added gently into the binder to avoid clumping to produce a homogenous modified binder. The mixing speed of the high-shear mixer to blend the waste material and binder was set at 1000 rpm.


## 3. Test Methods

### 3.1. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)

The testing was initiated by preparing samples of bitumen, CRP, or TS mixed binder of about 100 g with each placing in a 2 L plastic bottle together with extractor fluid #1 used as leaching fluid. The buffer chosen for the extraction of fluid depends on the pH of the samples. The preparation of extraction fluid #1 was started by mixing glacial acetic acid (CH3COOH) (5.7 mL) into 1 L Type II reagent water, followed with the addition of 1 N NaOH (64.3 mL), and diluted it to the volume of 2 L with final pH 4.93 ± 0.05. Type II reagent water was filtered by the New Human Power System water filter (Figure 3(a)). Referring to Figure 3(b), the plastic bottles were placed in an Automatic Rotary Agitator at 18 ± 2 h at room temperature. After agitation, the samples were filtrated with 0.7 µm glass microfiber filters. The filtered samples were collected and analyzed for 21 chemical elements. The concentrations (ppm) of chemical elements such as arsenic (As), beryllium (Be), calcium (Ca), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), lithium (Li), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), antimony (Sb), selenium (Se), strontium (Sr), thallium (Ti), thallium (Tl), vanadium (V), and zinc (Zn) were determined by state-of-the-art equipment namely ICP-OES (Varian 715-ES ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer). The same approach was repeated for tin slag samples. Table 4 shows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).Table 4
Metals’ hazardous waste parameters by the US EPA [27].
MetalsRegulatory level (ppm)Arsenic (As)5.0Barium (Ba)100.0Cadmium (Cd)1.0Chromium (Cr)5.0Lead (Pb)5.0Mercury (Hg)0.2Selenium (Se)1.0Silver (Ag)5.0


### 3.2. Basic Properties of Asphalt Binders

The asphalt binder basic tests were carried out using the penetration, softening point, elastic recovery, and torsional recovery tests. The penetration test was performed in accordance with ASTM D5 [28] to evaluate the differences in penetration grade and the consistency of asphalt binders. Likewise, the softening point test determined the temperature of the initial asphalt binder response as followed by the ASTM D36 procedure [29]. Moreover, the determination of temperature susceptibility of crumb rubber and tin slag modified asphalt binders was evaluated from the penetration index (PI), which was obtained from the penetration and softening point test. The calculation of penetration index is shown in Shell Bitumen Handbook as stated in the following equation:(1)PI=1952−500logPen25−20xSP50logPen25−SP−120,where Pen25 refers to the penetration at 25°C, and SP refers to the softening point temperature of modified asphalt binder.The elastomeric characteristics of the asphalt binder and modified binders were ascertained via elastic recovery and torsional recovery. The elastic recovery test was done by following AASHTO T51 and ASTM D6084 [30, 31]. This elastic testing was conducted at 25°C according to ASTM specification, in which the binder specimens were pulled apart in a ductilometer and held after reaching a specified elongation during the test. The specimens are then cut in the middle of the elongation, and the percent recovery of each specimen is determined [31].The torsional recovery test is an inventive method in determining the elasticity in the asphalt binder. It was conducted following the ARRB AG: PT/T112 procedure [32] at 25°C. This test was performed by embedding a metal disc in a cup of asphalt, and the sample container was rotated at 180°. Then, the band was removed, and the specimen was left aside to recover for 30 seconds. The torsional recovery percentage (TR) was calculated by the following equation:(2)TR=A180×100,where A is recovered angle, in degrees.


### 3.3. Binder Coatability Test

The coatability of the asphalt mixtures was determined based on the aggregate absorption method in accordance with the AASHTO T 195 [33]. In this method, only coarse aggregate particles are considered. The short-term aged coated aggregate with a soaking time of 60 minutes was presumed that a completely coated aggregate would demonstrate high resistance towards the diffusion of water due to the presence of asphalt film that covered the aggregate surface. Otherwise, a coated aggregate could be prone to water absorption by allowing the water to diffuse into the partly coated aggregate [34–36].This study determined the coatability of asphalt base binder and modified asphalt mixtures by the following procedures. Firstly, the 20 mm coarse aggregate was wet-sieved in order to remove the excessive fine particles. Then, the coarse aggregate was dried in an oven at a temperature of 105 ± 5°C for 24 ± 0.5 hours. Oven-dried coarse aggregate was sieved, and the portion retained on the 10 mm sieve size was used to prepare the sample. A 2,000 g batch sample consisted of 26% of aggregate between 20 mm and 14 mm, and 74% of aggregate with sizes ranging from 14 mm to 10 mm was prepared. Six individual batches were formed from coarse aggregate gradations following Marshall mix design, with three batches sample of 2,000 g subjected to preheating at a mixing temperature of 160°C for four hours, and the others were stored at the room temperature. The considerations have taken to their rheological behavior at mixing, and construction temperature, the base asphalt binder, and modified asphalt binder were subjected to a high temperature of 163°C for at least 85 minutes to simulate the short-term aging process artificially. The aging process was conducted in accordance with ASTM D 2872 [37].Mix design and the surface area distribution of the coarse aggregate fraction determined the required amount of binder. Equations (3) to (6) were used to compute the binder content and the output parameters such as absorption of loss mixture aggregate, absorption of aggregate, and coating index of each mixture. The input parameters used for the sample preparation are presented in Table 5. The amount of binder of 41.25 g was mixed with the 2,000 g of coarse aggregate fraction batch. The optimum binder content (OBC) of Pb was obtained from the Marshall mix design. The asphalt binders were subjected to heating for two hours. Then, the loose mixture was placed into a bucket mixer for 60 seconds before being transferred into a tray and heated in the oven for the next two hours. These allow for binder absorption and induce the short-term aging process during production simultaneously. Moreover, the loose mixture was cooled at room temperature overnight. Both aggregates and loose mixture were exposed to water for 60 minutes. Then, a dry towel was used to remove the excess water until the saturated surface dried (SSD) condition was achieved. The masses obtained for aggregate and loose mixture in SSD condition were recorded as Wagg-SSD and Wloose-SSD, respectively.(3)Binder content,Wb=Wagg×Pb100−Pb×SAcoarseSST×1Ps−coarse,(4)Abs%loose=Wloose−SSD−Wagg+WbWagg+Wb×100,(5)Abs%agg=Wagg−SSD−WaggWagg×100,(6)coating index=Abs%agg−Abs%looseAbs%agg×100.Table 5
The amount of materials required for the sample preparation.
ParametersValuesThe optimum of binder content, Pb5.0%Coarse aggregate,Wagg2,000 gThe surface area of the combined aggregate, SAcoarse0.41 m2/kgThe total surface area of mix design combined aggregate, SST5.507 m2/kgPercentages of coarse aggregate retained on a 10 mm sieve,Ps-coarse19%The surface area of mix design combined with aggregates is calculated by adopting methods from previous studies and past laboratory work experiences regarding aggregate gradation [38]. The calculation for surface area determination is shown in Table 6.Table 6
The determination of surface area.
Sieve size (mm)Percent passing (%)Surface area factor (m2/kg)Surface area (m2/kg)20100—0.411495——1081——5560.410.2293.35470.820.38541.18261.640.42640.425184.780.86040.151012.291.2290.075632.771.9662Total surface area of combination size aggregate5.507


## 3.1. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)

The testing was initiated by preparing samples of bitumen, CRP, or TS mixed binder of about 100 g with each placing in a 2 L plastic bottle together with extractor fluid #1 used as leaching fluid. The buffer chosen for the extraction of fluid depends on the pH of the samples. The preparation of extraction fluid #1 was started by mixing glacial acetic acid (CH3COOH) (5.7 mL) into 1 L Type II reagent water, followed with the addition of 1 N NaOH (64.3 mL), and diluted it to the volume of 2 L with final pH 4.93 ± 0.05. Type II reagent water was filtered by the New Human Power System water filter (Figure 3(a)). Referring to Figure 3(b), the plastic bottles were placed in an Automatic Rotary Agitator at 18 ± 2 h at room temperature. After agitation, the samples were filtrated with 0.7 µm glass microfiber filters. The filtered samples were collected and analyzed for 21 chemical elements. The concentrations (ppm) of chemical elements such as arsenic (As), beryllium (Be), calcium (Ca), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), lithium (Li), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), antimony (Sb), selenium (Se), strontium (Sr), thallium (Ti), thallium (Tl), vanadium (V), and zinc (Zn) were determined by state-of-the-art equipment namely ICP-OES (Varian 715-ES ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer). The same approach was repeated for tin slag samples. Table 4 shows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).Table 4
Metals’ hazardous waste parameters by the US EPA [27].
MetalsRegulatory level (ppm)Arsenic (As)5.0Barium (Ba)100.0Cadmium (Cd)1.0Chromium (Cr)5.0Lead (Pb)5.0Mercury (Hg)0.2Selenium (Se)1.0Silver (Ag)5.0


## 3.2. Basic Properties of Asphalt Binders

The asphalt binder basic tests were carried out using the penetration, softening point, elastic recovery, and torsional recovery tests. The penetration test was performed in accordance with ASTM D5 [28] to evaluate the differences in penetration grade and the consistency of asphalt binders. Likewise, the softening point test determined the temperature of the initial asphalt binder response as followed by the ASTM D36 procedure [29]. Moreover, the determination of temperature susceptibility of crumb rubber and tin slag modified asphalt binders was evaluated from the penetration index (PI), which was obtained from the penetration and softening point test. The calculation of penetration index is shown in Shell Bitumen Handbook as stated in the following equation:(1)PI=1952−500logPen25−20xSP50logPen25−SP−120,where Pen25 refers to the penetration at 25°C, and SP refers to the softening point temperature of modified asphalt binder.The elastomeric characteristics of the asphalt binder and modified binders were ascertained via elastic recovery and torsional recovery. The elastic recovery test was done by following AASHTO T51 and ASTM D6084 [30, 31]. This elastic testing was conducted at 25°C according to ASTM specification, in which the binder specimens were pulled apart in a ductilometer and held after reaching a specified elongation during the test. The specimens are then cut in the middle of the elongation, and the percent recovery of each specimen is determined [31].The torsional recovery test is an inventive method in determining the elasticity in the asphalt binder. It was conducted following the ARRB AG: PT/T112 procedure [32] at 25°C. This test was performed by embedding a metal disc in a cup of asphalt, and the sample container was rotated at 180°. Then, the band was removed, and the specimen was left aside to recover for 30 seconds. The torsional recovery percentage (TR) was calculated by the following equation:(2)TR=A180×100,where A is recovered angle, in degrees.


## 3.3. Binder Coatability Test

The coatability of the asphalt mixtures was determined based on the aggregate absorption method in accordance with the AASHTO T 195 [33]. In this method, only coarse aggregate particles are considered. The short-term aged coated aggregate with a soaking time of 60 minutes was presumed that a completely coated aggregate would demonstrate high resistance towards the diffusion of water due to the presence of asphalt film that covered the aggregate surface. Otherwise, a coated aggregate could be prone to water absorption by allowing the water to diffuse into the partly coated aggregate [34–36].This study determined the coatability of asphalt base binder and modified asphalt mixtures by the following procedures. Firstly, the 20 mm coarse aggregate was wet-sieved in order to remove the excessive fine particles. Then, the coarse aggregate was dried in an oven at a temperature of 105 ± 5°C for 24 ± 0.5 hours. Oven-dried coarse aggregate was sieved, and the portion retained on the 10 mm sieve size was used to prepare the sample. A 2,000 g batch sample consisted of 26% of aggregate between 20 mm and 14 mm, and 74% of aggregate with sizes ranging from 14 mm to 10 mm was prepared. Six individual batches were formed from coarse aggregate gradations following Marshall mix design, with three batches sample of 2,000 g subjected to preheating at a mixing temperature of 160°C for four hours, and the others were stored at the room temperature. The considerations have taken to their rheological behavior at mixing, and construction temperature, the base asphalt binder, and modified asphalt binder were subjected to a high temperature of 163°C for at least 85 minutes to simulate the short-term aging process artificially. The aging process was conducted in accordance with ASTM D 2872 [37].Mix design and the surface area distribution of the coarse aggregate fraction determined the required amount of binder. Equations (3) to (6) were used to compute the binder content and the output parameters such as absorption of loss mixture aggregate, absorption of aggregate, and coating index of each mixture. The input parameters used for the sample preparation are presented in Table 5. The amount of binder of 41.25 g was mixed with the 2,000 g of coarse aggregate fraction batch. The optimum binder content (OBC) of Pb was obtained from the Marshall mix design. The asphalt binders were subjected to heating for two hours. Then, the loose mixture was placed into a bucket mixer for 60 seconds before being transferred into a tray and heated in the oven for the next two hours. These allow for binder absorption and induce the short-term aging process during production simultaneously. Moreover, the loose mixture was cooled at room temperature overnight. Both aggregates and loose mixture were exposed to water for 60 minutes. Then, a dry towel was used to remove the excess water until the saturated surface dried (SSD) condition was achieved. The masses obtained for aggregate and loose mixture in SSD condition were recorded as Wagg-SSD and Wloose-SSD, respectively.(3)Binder content,Wb=Wagg×Pb100−Pb×SAcoarseSST×1Ps−coarse,(4)Abs%loose=Wloose−SSD−Wagg+WbWagg+Wb×100,(5)Abs%agg=Wagg−SSD−WaggWagg×100,(6)coating index=Abs%agg−Abs%looseAbs%agg×100.Table 5
The amount of materials required for the sample preparation.
ParametersValuesThe optimum of binder content, Pb5.0%Coarse aggregate,Wagg2,000 gThe surface area of the combined aggregate, SAcoarse0.41 m2/kgThe total surface area of mix design combined aggregate, SST5.507 m2/kgPercentages of coarse aggregate retained on a 10 mm sieve,Ps-coarse19%The surface area of mix design combined with aggregates is calculated by adopting methods from previous studies and past laboratory work experiences regarding aggregate gradation [38]. The calculation for surface area determination is shown in Table 6.Table 6
The determination of surface area.
Sieve size (mm)Percent passing (%)Surface area factor (m2/kg)Surface area (m2/kg)20100—0.411495——1081——5560.410.2293.35470.820.38541.18261.640.42640.425184.780.86040.151012.291.2290.075632.771.9662Total surface area of combination size aggregate5.507


## 4. Results and Discussion

### 4.1. Effect of Crumb Rubber and Tin Slag on the Leaching Potential

The current study investigates the potential leaching of heavy metals from crumb rubber, tin slag, and conventional asphalt binder through TCLP experiments. The collected leachates of the samples were analyzed for the heavy metals by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES). The initial TCLP test was performed on raw material, namely, crumb rubber powder, tin slag, and unmodified asphalt binder. Next, the TCLP test was performed on crumb rubber powder and tin slag incorporated asphalt mixture. The TCLP test was conducted at two different stages to deliver a thorough correlation between the leaching of raw materials and the incorporation of raw material into asphalt mixtures. Along with this, the research findings indicated the effect of asphalt binder in reducing the leaching of heavy metals from the raw materials. Furthermore, the findings of TCLP analysis for crumb rubber powder, tin slag, and asphalt binder can be used to portray the mobility of heavy metals and replicate the leaching situation, as heavy metals elements were leached by acid rain.The unmodified asphalt binder was tested as a control sample. The filtered samples or leachate solution was analyzed for the chemical elements using optical emission spectroscopy (ICP VARIAN 715-OES). The results from the leachate solution of the unmodified asphalt binder analysis implied that the chemical elements such as Arsenic (As), Beryllium (Be), Cadmium (Cd), Cobalt (Co), Copper (Cu), Lithium (Li), Lead (Pb), Strontium (Sr), and Thallium (Tl) were not detected. However, Ca, Cr, Fe, Mg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sb, Se, Ti, V, and Zn were detected via the conducted tests. The experimental results of the TCLP for these materials in Table7 were expressed in part per million (ppm). Zinc was detected with the highest concentration recorded as 62 ppm in crumb rubber powder, but it is still considered within the safe level compared to its maximum allowable limit of 250 ppm in Table 4. Chromium and selenium, which are more hazardous, were obtained at a concentration of 0.007 ppm and 0.235 ppm, respectively, for crumb rubber powder, while they were 0.003 ppm and 0.078 ppm for tin slag. Chromium was not detected in asphalt binder samples, yet selenium was detected at 0.134 ppm. Nevertheless, it is very much lower than the regulatory level according to the metals hazardous waste parameters by US EPA regulatory in Table 4 [27].Table 7
Metal elements’ concentrations on bitumen, crumb rubber powder, and tin slag leachate solution.
Metal elementsBitumen (ppm)Crumb rubber (ppm)Tin slag (ppm)Calcium (Ca)0.53826.05019.341Chromium (Cr)—0.0070.003Iron (Fe)0.0342.2755.921Magnesium (Mg)0.1161.0203.369Manganese (Mn)—0.0350.466Molybdenum (Mo)0.0770.1080.256Nickel (Ni)—0.0350.034Antimony (Sb)0.0740.0450.051Selenium (Se)0.1340.2350.78Titanium (Ti)0.0440.0490.050Vanadium (V)0.0050.0110.046Zinc (Zn)0.15261.81ACT50.495Meanwhile, the results in Table8 show the detected metal elements concentrations for the samples of asphalt binder with the incorporation of crumb rubber powder at different concentrations. Generally, the trend of the experimental results showed that the increasing amount of crumb rubber powder caused a hike in certain heavy metal elements. A higher amount of heavy metals contamination for Ca, Fe, Mg, and Ti was detected in the filtered leachate solution for a higher portion of crumb rubber powder. This proved that incorporating asphalt binder mixed with crumb rubber powder does not facilitate or has no effect in reducing these heavy metal elements in the leaching process, which primarily comes from crumb rubber powder. In the case of selenium, it was found to be eliminated in bitumen mixed for 5%, 10%, and 15% added crumb rubber, but vanadium was slightly increased at 15% added crumb rubber in comparison to 5% and 10%. There was a fluctuation for Mo, Sb, and Zn, which could be occurred due to many factors such as the varying portion of chemical elements in the crumb rubber added into the specimens.Table 8
Metal elements’ concentrations on CRP-modified bitumen leachate solution.
Metal elementsBit. +5% CRP (ppm)Bit. +10% CRP (ppm)Bit. +15% CRP (ppm)Calcium (Ca)0.2710.5420.798Iron (Fe)0.0450.0640.367Magnesium (Mg)0.2260.3140.956Molybdenum (Mo)0.0640.0620.062Antimony (Sb)0.112—0.049Selenium (Se)———Titanium (Ti)0.0460.0470.093Vanadium (V)0.0040.0040.006Zinc (Zn)0.0840.0600.089The metals considered as hazardous such as As, Cd, Cr, and Pb were evaluated to be below detectable limits, except Se that was obtained at 0.171 ppm but below 1 ppm limit. Other metals obtained below detectable limits consisted of Be, Co, Cu, Li, Mn, Ni, Sr, and Tl. The analysis was obtained in a minimum of Ca, Fe, Mg, Mo, Sb, Se, It, V, and Zn. The results showed that not only bitumen mixed sources of toxicity from crumb rubber were emanated but the bitumen itself also contributed to some of these toxic contaminants.Table9 shows the metal elements concentrations on bitumen added tin slag mixed leachate solutions. The experimental results show that a bigger portion of tin slag causes higher Ca, Fe, Mg, Se, and Ti contamination in the leachate solutions. Meanwhile, for Mo, Sb, V, and Zn, the fluctuations might be similar to what was mentioned earlier. However, metal elements in bitumen added with tin slag mixed leachates solution are very low and below the regulatory level according to the metals hazardous waste parameters stated by US EPA, as shown in Table 4.Table 9
Metal elements’ concentrations on TS-modified bitumen leachate solution.
Metal elementsBit. +5% CRP (ppm)Bit. +10% CRP (ppm)Bit. +15% CRP (ppm)Calcium (Ca)0.2310.4491.944Iron (Fe)0.0450.0640.367Magnesium (Mg)0.2260.3140.956Molybdenum (Mo)0.0640.0620.062Antimony (Sb)0.112—0.049Selenium (Se)—0.1270.168Titanium (Ti)0.0460.0470.093Vanadium (V)0.0040.0040.006Zinc (Zn)0.0840.0780.089


### 4.2. Basic and Physical Characterization of the Asphalt Binder

#### 4.2.1. Softening Point, Penetration, and Elastic Recovery Results

Results tabulated in Table10 show that the asphalt binder's basic and physical properties are incorporated with crumb rubber powder and tin slag. The properties of all asphalt binders were assessed through penetration tests by evaluating their consistency and softening point. These tests were assisted in identifying the maximum service temperature; meanwhile, an elastic recovery test was used to determine the rate of the elastic response of asphalt binders. Table 10 demonstrates a reduction in penetration, while the softening point value increased with the increasing content of additive. This trend was acceptable on the crumb rubber modified asphalt binder except for the tin slag modified asphalt binder. There were no changes in the penetration and softening point for the tin slag modified asphalt binder, regardless of their concentrations. Nonetheless, the penetration and softening point of tin slag modified asphalt binder exhibited lower than the control asphalt binder. The increase in softening point is essential as the asphalt binder will be less temperature susceptible in resisting permanent deformation. The higher softening point and lower penetration value are due to the stiffening effect of additives. In addition, the different tin slag dosages have resulted in similar results for both the softening point and penetration value due to insufficient elastic response and stiffening effect of tin slag. Bitumen with imbalanced chemical compound and molecular weight distribution has presented a low penetration ratio and penetration index (PI) values resulting in high-temperature susceptibility. The asphalt binder was enhanced by reducing the temperature susceptibility, which led to a higher penetration index. As tabulated in Table 10, crumb rubber powder modified asphalt binders exhibited low susceptibility to temperature compared to the control asphalt binder as the crumb rubber content increased. Nevertheless, the tin slag modified asphalt binders are prone to temperature difference since the penetration index is much lower than the control asphalt binder due to the effects of softening point.Table 10
Basic properties of asphalt binders.
PropertiesControl sampleCrumb rubber content (%)Tin slag content (%)5%10%15%5%10%15%Penetration, dmm65585442565757Softening point, °C50535661494845Penetration index−0.5740.2170.9572.062−2.255−2.255−2.255Elastic recovery, %92.354373291.679191.67Ductility, cm>100>100>100>100>100>100>100The incorporation of crumb rubber powder has a significant influence on the behavior of modified asphalt binders. The crumb rubber powder-based modified asphalt binder shows a linear increase for all types of rubberized asphalt binder. Elastic recovery findings were comparable to rubberized bitumen ductility outcomes as it demonstrates the high elasticity of modified asphalt binder and its recovery after deformation, enhancing the resistance behavior towards permanent deformation. The outcome of the test presented that a lower percentage of recovery indicated a better recovery. The elastic recovery findings improved for all concentrations of crumb rubber powder from 92.3% for unmodified asphalt binder to 54%, 37%, and 32% for 5%, 10%, and 15% for crumb rubber powder modified asphalt binders, respectively. The crumb rubber powder has significantly improved the elastic recovery and indicated that the asphalt binder could recover after removing a certain amount of strain load. This is caused by the natural elastic behavior of the crumb rubber powder, which is also an elastomer. However, the tin slag modified asphalt binders do not portray any elastic recovery since the findings are comparably similar to the control sample. This is because tin slag does not possess an elastic behavior as it is not an elastomer or plastomer. Conclusively, it inferred that the addition of crumb rubber powder significantly affected the basic properties of asphalt binder, while tin slag showed the opposite due to its inelastic behavior.


#### 4.2.2. Torsional Recovery (TR)

Results for torsional recovery of asphalt base binder modified with CRP and TS at 5%, 10%, and 15% dosages are presented in Tables11 and 12, respectively. The incorporation of CRP and TS as additives in asphalt binder changes the recovery percentage at 5%, 10%, and 15% compared to the control binder. The torsional recovery percentage of the binder with the incorporation of CRP in Table 11 portrayed a significant improvement in the elasticity of the asphalt binder at all percentages. Moreover, the highest and the least percentage recovery difference observed compared to the conventional asphalt binder were 9% and 1.7%, respectively. The addition of TS in the asphalt binder, as shown in Table 12, showed a contrary pattern as compared to CRP. The torsional recovery differences of 5%, 10%, and 15% modified TS binders in the conventional asphalt binder have identical values with 0.5% due to their similar torsional recovery angle observed.Table 11
Torsional recovery results of CRP modified binders.
Asphalt binderRecovered angle (o)Torsional recovery (%)% (differences)TRControl10.6—5% CRP4.22.31.710% CRP11.16.15.515% CRP17.29.69.0Table 12
Torsional recovery results of TS modified binders.
Asphalt bindersRecovered angle (o)Torsional recovery (%)% (differences)TRControl10.6—5% TS2.01.10.510% TS2.01.10.515% TS2.01.10.5Conclusively, it deduced that the incorporation of CRP and TS, which was influencing the formation of crystalline network lattice in the binder structure, resulted in returning the pointer of the apparatus to its initial position due to controlled recovery force.


#### 4.2.3. Coatability Index

The coatability results for the conventional asphalt mixture (HMA) and wastes modified asphalt mixtures of CRP and TS are shown in Table13. Subsequently, the averaged absorption of the three trials with loose mixes and the bare aggregates was tested, and the coating indexes were computed. The conventional HMA findings are compared with wastes modified asphalt mixtures. The coatability testing for the mixtures was conducted by using three different dosages at 5%, 10%, and 15% (CRP and TS), respectively. The results of asphalt added with CRP and TS were different from those of the controlled sample. The coating index of the mixture with CRP showed better performance at 5% dosage; meanwhile, TS performed better at 10% dosage. Moreover, the absorption of the aggregate particles was decreased due to the improvement in coating index by the modified asphalts. However, a low marginal difference was observed between different percentages of TS. The mixtures containing 15% CRP and TS showed the highest absorption rate corresponding to the lowest coating index. This indicates that absorption and coatability rate was dependent on the dosages and chemical compositions of waste materials. Likewise, the CRP exhibits more elastic and bonding characteristics than the TS. The results show reasonable trends in the variable percentages of CRP and TS in asphalt mixture compared to HMA.Table 13
Coatability test results of the control and waste-modified asphalt mixtures.
SpecimenWater absorption of loose mix (%)Coating indexControl0.2288.25% CRP0.0497.610% CRP0.1194.515% CRP0.1393.15% TS0.0995.310% TS0.0896.015% TS0.1493.0


## 4.1. Effect of Crumb Rubber and Tin Slag on the Leaching Potential

The current study investigates the potential leaching of heavy metals from crumb rubber, tin slag, and conventional asphalt binder through TCLP experiments. The collected leachates of the samples were analyzed for the heavy metals by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES). The initial TCLP test was performed on raw material, namely, crumb rubber powder, tin slag, and unmodified asphalt binder. Next, the TCLP test was performed on crumb rubber powder and tin slag incorporated asphalt mixture. The TCLP test was conducted at two different stages to deliver a thorough correlation between the leaching of raw materials and the incorporation of raw material into asphalt mixtures. Along with this, the research findings indicated the effect of asphalt binder in reducing the leaching of heavy metals from the raw materials. Furthermore, the findings of TCLP analysis for crumb rubber powder, tin slag, and asphalt binder can be used to portray the mobility of heavy metals and replicate the leaching situation, as heavy metals elements were leached by acid rain.The unmodified asphalt binder was tested as a control sample. The filtered samples or leachate solution was analyzed for the chemical elements using optical emission spectroscopy (ICP VARIAN 715-OES). The results from the leachate solution of the unmodified asphalt binder analysis implied that the chemical elements such as Arsenic (As), Beryllium (Be), Cadmium (Cd), Cobalt (Co), Copper (Cu), Lithium (Li), Lead (Pb), Strontium (Sr), and Thallium (Tl) were not detected. However, Ca, Cr, Fe, Mg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sb, Se, Ti, V, and Zn were detected via the conducted tests. The experimental results of the TCLP for these materials in Table7 were expressed in part per million (ppm). Zinc was detected with the highest concentration recorded as 62 ppm in crumb rubber powder, but it is still considered within the safe level compared to its maximum allowable limit of 250 ppm in Table 4. Chromium and selenium, which are more hazardous, were obtained at a concentration of 0.007 ppm and 0.235 ppm, respectively, for crumb rubber powder, while they were 0.003 ppm and 0.078 ppm for tin slag. Chromium was not detected in asphalt binder samples, yet selenium was detected at 0.134 ppm. Nevertheless, it is very much lower than the regulatory level according to the metals hazardous waste parameters by US EPA regulatory in Table 4 [27].Table 7
Metal elements’ concentrations on bitumen, crumb rubber powder, and tin slag leachate solution.
Metal elementsBitumen (ppm)Crumb rubber (ppm)Tin slag (ppm)Calcium (Ca)0.53826.05019.341Chromium (Cr)—0.0070.003Iron (Fe)0.0342.2755.921Magnesium (Mg)0.1161.0203.369Manganese (Mn)—0.0350.466Molybdenum (Mo)0.0770.1080.256Nickel (Ni)—0.0350.034Antimony (Sb)0.0740.0450.051Selenium (Se)0.1340.2350.78Titanium (Ti)0.0440.0490.050Vanadium (V)0.0050.0110.046Zinc (Zn)0.15261.81ACT50.495Meanwhile, the results in Table8 show the detected metal elements concentrations for the samples of asphalt binder with the incorporation of crumb rubber powder at different concentrations. Generally, the trend of the experimental results showed that the increasing amount of crumb rubber powder caused a hike in certain heavy metal elements. A higher amount of heavy metals contamination for Ca, Fe, Mg, and Ti was detected in the filtered leachate solution for a higher portion of crumb rubber powder. This proved that incorporating asphalt binder mixed with crumb rubber powder does not facilitate or has no effect in reducing these heavy metal elements in the leaching process, which primarily comes from crumb rubber powder. In the case of selenium, it was found to be eliminated in bitumen mixed for 5%, 10%, and 15% added crumb rubber, but vanadium was slightly increased at 15% added crumb rubber in comparison to 5% and 10%. There was a fluctuation for Mo, Sb, and Zn, which could be occurred due to many factors such as the varying portion of chemical elements in the crumb rubber added into the specimens.Table 8
Metal elements’ concentrations on CRP-modified bitumen leachate solution.
Metal elementsBit. +5% CRP (ppm)Bit. +10% CRP (ppm)Bit. +15% CRP (ppm)Calcium (Ca)0.2710.5420.798Iron (Fe)0.0450.0640.367Magnesium (Mg)0.2260.3140.956Molybdenum (Mo)0.0640.0620.062Antimony (Sb)0.112—0.049Selenium (Se)———Titanium (Ti)0.0460.0470.093Vanadium (V)0.0040.0040.006Zinc (Zn)0.0840.0600.089The metals considered as hazardous such as As, Cd, Cr, and Pb were evaluated to be below detectable limits, except Se that was obtained at 0.171 ppm but below 1 ppm limit. Other metals obtained below detectable limits consisted of Be, Co, Cu, Li, Mn, Ni, Sr, and Tl. The analysis was obtained in a minimum of Ca, Fe, Mg, Mo, Sb, Se, It, V, and Zn. The results showed that not only bitumen mixed sources of toxicity from crumb rubber were emanated but the bitumen itself also contributed to some of these toxic contaminants.Table9 shows the metal elements concentrations on bitumen added tin slag mixed leachate solutions. The experimental results show that a bigger portion of tin slag causes higher Ca, Fe, Mg, Se, and Ti contamination in the leachate solutions. Meanwhile, for Mo, Sb, V, and Zn, the fluctuations might be similar to what was mentioned earlier. However, metal elements in bitumen added with tin slag mixed leachates solution are very low and below the regulatory level according to the metals hazardous waste parameters stated by US EPA, as shown in Table 4.Table 9
Metal elements’ concentrations on TS-modified bitumen leachate solution.
Metal elementsBit. +5% CRP (ppm)Bit. +10% CRP (ppm)Bit. +15% CRP (ppm)Calcium (Ca)0.2310.4491.944Iron (Fe)0.0450.0640.367Magnesium (Mg)0.2260.3140.956Molybdenum (Mo)0.0640.0620.062Antimony (Sb)0.112—0.049Selenium (Se)—0.1270.168Titanium (Ti)0.0460.0470.093Vanadium (V)0.0040.0040.006Zinc (Zn)0.0840.0780.089


## 4.2. Basic and Physical Characterization of the Asphalt Binder

### 4.2.1. Softening Point, Penetration, and Elastic Recovery Results

Results tabulated in Table10 show that the asphalt binder's basic and physical properties are incorporated with crumb rubber powder and tin slag. The properties of all asphalt binders were assessed through penetration tests by evaluating their consistency and softening point. These tests were assisted in identifying the maximum service temperature; meanwhile, an elastic recovery test was used to determine the rate of the elastic response of asphalt binders. Table 10 demonstrates a reduction in penetration, while the softening point value increased with the increasing content of additive. This trend was acceptable on the crumb rubber modified asphalt binder except for the tin slag modified asphalt binder. There were no changes in the penetration and softening point for the tin slag modified asphalt binder, regardless of their concentrations. Nonetheless, the penetration and softening point of tin slag modified asphalt binder exhibited lower than the control asphalt binder. The increase in softening point is essential as the asphalt binder will be less temperature susceptible in resisting permanent deformation. The higher softening point and lower penetration value are due to the stiffening effect of additives. In addition, the different tin slag dosages have resulted in similar results for both the softening point and penetration value due to insufficient elastic response and stiffening effect of tin slag. Bitumen with imbalanced chemical compound and molecular weight distribution has presented a low penetration ratio and penetration index (PI) values resulting in high-temperature susceptibility. The asphalt binder was enhanced by reducing the temperature susceptibility, which led to a higher penetration index. As tabulated in Table 10, crumb rubber powder modified asphalt binders exhibited low susceptibility to temperature compared to the control asphalt binder as the crumb rubber content increased. Nevertheless, the tin slag modified asphalt binders are prone to temperature difference since the penetration index is much lower than the control asphalt binder due to the effects of softening point.Table 10
Basic properties of asphalt binders.
PropertiesControl sampleCrumb rubber content (%)Tin slag content (%)5%10%15%5%10%15%Penetration, dmm65585442565757Softening point, °C50535661494845Penetration index−0.5740.2170.9572.062−2.255−2.255−2.255Elastic recovery, %92.354373291.679191.67Ductility, cm>100>100>100>100>100>100>100The incorporation of crumb rubber powder has a significant influence on the behavior of modified asphalt binders. The crumb rubber powder-based modified asphalt binder shows a linear increase for all types of rubberized asphalt binder. Elastic recovery findings were comparable to rubberized bitumen ductility outcomes as it demonstrates the high elasticity of modified asphalt binder and its recovery after deformation, enhancing the resistance behavior towards permanent deformation. The outcome of the test presented that a lower percentage of recovery indicated a better recovery. The elastic recovery findings improved for all concentrations of crumb rubber powder from 92.3% for unmodified asphalt binder to 54%, 37%, and 32% for 5%, 10%, and 15% for crumb rubber powder modified asphalt binders, respectively. The crumb rubber powder has significantly improved the elastic recovery and indicated that the asphalt binder could recover after removing a certain amount of strain load. This is caused by the natural elastic behavior of the crumb rubber powder, which is also an elastomer. However, the tin slag modified asphalt binders do not portray any elastic recovery since the findings are comparably similar to the control sample. This is because tin slag does not possess an elastic behavior as it is not an elastomer or plastomer. Conclusively, it inferred that the addition of crumb rubber powder significantly affected the basic properties of asphalt binder, while tin slag showed the opposite due to its inelastic behavior.


### 4.2.2. Torsional Recovery (TR)

Results for torsional recovery of asphalt base binder modified with CRP and TS at 5%, 10%, and 15% dosages are presented in Tables11 and 12, respectively. The incorporation of CRP and TS as additives in asphalt binder changes the recovery percentage at 5%, 10%, and 15% compared to the control binder. The torsional recovery percentage of the binder with the incorporation of CRP in Table 11 portrayed a significant improvement in the elasticity of the asphalt binder at all percentages. Moreover, the highest and the least percentage recovery difference observed compared to the conventional asphalt binder were 9% and 1.7%, respectively. The addition of TS in the asphalt binder, as shown in Table 12, showed a contrary pattern as compared to CRP. The torsional recovery differences of 5%, 10%, and 15% modified TS binders in the conventional asphalt binder have identical values with 0.5% due to their similar torsional recovery angle observed.Table 11
Torsional recovery results of CRP modified binders.
Asphalt binderRecovered angle (o)Torsional recovery (%)% (differences)TRControl10.6—5% CRP4.22.31.710% CRP11.16.15.515% CRP17.29.69.0Table 12
Torsional recovery results of TS modified binders.
Asphalt bindersRecovered angle (o)Torsional recovery (%)% (differences)TRControl10.6—5% TS2.01.10.510% TS2.01.10.515% TS2.01.10.5Conclusively, it deduced that the incorporation of CRP and TS, which was influencing the formation of crystalline network lattice in the binder structure, resulted in returning the pointer of the apparatus to its initial position due to controlled recovery force.


### 4.2.3. Coatability Index

The coatability results for the conventional asphalt mixture (HMA) and wastes modified asphalt mixtures of CRP and TS are shown in Table13. Subsequently, the averaged absorption of the three trials with loose mixes and the bare aggregates was tested, and the coating indexes were computed. The conventional HMA findings are compared with wastes modified asphalt mixtures. The coatability testing for the mixtures was conducted by using three different dosages at 5%, 10%, and 15% (CRP and TS), respectively. The results of asphalt added with CRP and TS were different from those of the controlled sample. The coating index of the mixture with CRP showed better performance at 5% dosage; meanwhile, TS performed better at 10% dosage. Moreover, the absorption of the aggregate particles was decreased due to the improvement in coating index by the modified asphalts. However, a low marginal difference was observed between different percentages of TS. The mixtures containing 15% CRP and TS showed the highest absorption rate corresponding to the lowest coating index. This indicates that absorption and coatability rate was dependent on the dosages and chemical compositions of waste materials. Likewise, the CRP exhibits more elastic and bonding characteristics than the TS. The results show reasonable trends in the variable percentages of CRP and TS in asphalt mixture compared to HMA.Table 13
Coatability test results of the control and waste-modified asphalt mixtures.
SpecimenWater absorption of loose mix (%)Coating indexControl0.2288.25% CRP0.0497.610% CRP0.1194.515% CRP0.1393.15% TS0.0995.310% TS0.0896.015% TS0.1493.0


## 4.2.1. Softening Point, Penetration, and Elastic Recovery Results

Results tabulated in Table10 show that the asphalt binder's basic and physical properties are incorporated with crumb rubber powder and tin slag. The properties of all asphalt binders were assessed through penetration tests by evaluating their consistency and softening point. These tests were assisted in identifying the maximum service temperature; meanwhile, an elastic recovery test was used to determine the rate of the elastic response of asphalt binders. Table 10 demonstrates a reduction in penetration, while the softening point value increased with the increasing content of additive. This trend was acceptable on the crumb rubber modified asphalt binder except for the tin slag modified asphalt binder. There were no changes in the penetration and softening point for the tin slag modified asphalt binder, regardless of their concentrations. Nonetheless, the penetration and softening point of tin slag modified asphalt binder exhibited lower than the control asphalt binder. The increase in softening point is essential as the asphalt binder will be less temperature susceptible in resisting permanent deformation. The higher softening point and lower penetration value are due to the stiffening effect of additives. In addition, the different tin slag dosages have resulted in similar results for both the softening point and penetration value due to insufficient elastic response and stiffening effect of tin slag. Bitumen with imbalanced chemical compound and molecular weight distribution has presented a low penetration ratio and penetration index (PI) values resulting in high-temperature susceptibility. The asphalt binder was enhanced by reducing the temperature susceptibility, which led to a higher penetration index. As tabulated in Table 10, crumb rubber powder modified asphalt binders exhibited low susceptibility to temperature compared to the control asphalt binder as the crumb rubber content increased. Nevertheless, the tin slag modified asphalt binders are prone to temperature difference since the penetration index is much lower than the control asphalt binder due to the effects of softening point.Table 10
Basic properties of asphalt binders.
PropertiesControl sampleCrumb rubber content (%)Tin slag content (%)5%10%15%5%10%15%Penetration, dmm65585442565757Softening point, °C50535661494845Penetration index−0.5740.2170.9572.062−2.255−2.255−2.255Elastic recovery, %92.354373291.679191.67Ductility, cm>100>100>100>100>100>100>100The incorporation of crumb rubber powder has a significant influence on the behavior of modified asphalt binders. The crumb rubber powder-based modified asphalt binder shows a linear increase for all types of rubberized asphalt binder. Elastic recovery findings were comparable to rubberized bitumen ductility outcomes as it demonstrates the high elasticity of modified asphalt binder and its recovery after deformation, enhancing the resistance behavior towards permanent deformation. The outcome of the test presented that a lower percentage of recovery indicated a better recovery. The elastic recovery findings improved for all concentrations of crumb rubber powder from 92.3% for unmodified asphalt binder to 54%, 37%, and 32% for 5%, 10%, and 15% for crumb rubber powder modified asphalt binders, respectively. The crumb rubber powder has significantly improved the elastic recovery and indicated that the asphalt binder could recover after removing a certain amount of strain load. This is caused by the natural elastic behavior of the crumb rubber powder, which is also an elastomer. However, the tin slag modified asphalt binders do not portray any elastic recovery since the findings are comparably similar to the control sample. This is because tin slag does not possess an elastic behavior as it is not an elastomer or plastomer. Conclusively, it inferred that the addition of crumb rubber powder significantly affected the basic properties of asphalt binder, while tin slag showed the opposite due to its inelastic behavior.


## 4.2.2. Torsional Recovery (TR)

Results for torsional recovery of asphalt base binder modified with CRP and TS at 5%, 10%, and 15% dosages are presented in Tables11 and 12, respectively. The incorporation of CRP and TS as additives in asphalt binder changes the recovery percentage at 5%, 10%, and 15% compared to the control binder. The torsional recovery percentage of the binder with the incorporation of CRP in Table 11 portrayed a significant improvement in the elasticity of the asphalt binder at all percentages. Moreover, the highest and the least percentage recovery difference observed compared to the conventional asphalt binder were 9% and 1.7%, respectively. The addition of TS in the asphalt binder, as shown in Table 12, showed a contrary pattern as compared to CRP. The torsional recovery differences of 5%, 10%, and 15% modified TS binders in the conventional asphalt binder have identical values with 0.5% due to their similar torsional recovery angle observed.Table 11
Torsional recovery results of CRP modified binders.
Asphalt binderRecovered angle (o)Torsional recovery (%)% (differences)TRControl10.6—5% CRP4.22.31.710% CRP11.16.15.515% CRP17.29.69.0Table 12
Torsional recovery results of TS modified binders.
Asphalt bindersRecovered angle (o)Torsional recovery (%)% (differences)TRControl10.6—5% TS2.01.10.510% TS2.01.10.515% TS2.01.10.5Conclusively, it deduced that the incorporation of CRP and TS, which was influencing the formation of crystalline network lattice in the binder structure, resulted in returning the pointer of the apparatus to its initial position due to controlled recovery force.


## 4.2.3. Coatability Index

The coatability results for the conventional asphalt mixture (HMA) and wastes modified asphalt mixtures of CRP and TS are shown in Table13. Subsequently, the averaged absorption of the three trials with loose mixes and the bare aggregates was tested, and the coating indexes were computed. The conventional HMA findings are compared with wastes modified asphalt mixtures. The coatability testing for the mixtures was conducted by using three different dosages at 5%, 10%, and 15% (CRP and TS), respectively. The results of asphalt added with CRP and TS were different from those of the controlled sample. The coating index of the mixture with CRP showed better performance at 5% dosage; meanwhile, TS performed better at 10% dosage. Moreover, the absorption of the aggregate particles was decreased due to the improvement in coating index by the modified asphalts. However, a low marginal difference was observed between different percentages of TS. The mixtures containing 15% CRP and TS showed the highest absorption rate corresponding to the lowest coating index. This indicates that absorption and coatability rate was dependent on the dosages and chemical compositions of waste materials. Likewise, the CRP exhibits more elastic and bonding characteristics than the TS. The results show reasonable trends in the variable percentages of CRP and TS in asphalt mixture compared to HMA.Table 13
Coatability test results of the control and waste-modified asphalt mixtures.
SpecimenWater absorption of loose mix (%)Coating indexControl0.2288.25% CRP0.0497.610% CRP0.1194.515% CRP0.1393.15% TS0.0995.310% TS0.0896.015% TS0.1493.0


## 5. Conclusion

This current study demonstrated the effects of differences in percentages of CRP and TS on the leaching potential, basic, and physical properties, as well as the coatability of asphalt binder. The obtained findings concluded that the quantity of CRP and TS waste materials in bitumen impacts the metal concentration present in mixtures with leachate solutions. Moreover, the higher percentage portion of CRP and TS resulted in a higher increment of the metals content. The existence of metals in bitumen mix was a minor concern due to their low quantity and minimum toxicity. Therefore, this study portrayed that CRP and TS metals content presents an insignificant source of hazard towards the environment and groundwater.Furthermore, the basic properties of CRP and TS modified binders significantly improved the physical properties (softening point, penetration, elastic recovery, and coatability) of the conventional asphalt binder and modified binder. The modified binders with CRP demonstrated a better improvement compared to the base asphalt binder and TS.Torsional recovery results with CRP incorporation showed an obvious improvement inelastic response of the asphalt binder at all percentages compared to the base asphalt binder and TS samples. In addition, the TS showed an identical elastic response across the percentages considered.



---

*Source: 2137957-2021-09-27.xml*