# Compact Four-Port Dual-Sense Circularly Polarized Stack-Up Patch Antenna for UHF/MW-RFID MIMO System

Authors: Enze Zhang; Jinghui Qiu
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

A four-port dual-band dual circularly polarized (CP) stack-up patch antenna is introduced for multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) RFID application. The proposed antenna adopts two FR 4 substrates and one Rogers Ro4350b substrates. Two pairs of isolated ports work at FCC UHF/MW-RFID bands (0.902–0.928 and 2.4–2.485 GHz) with port isolations of 20 dB and 25 dB, respectively. Four inverted-F radiating elements fed with a 90° phase-delay feeding network realize the CP radiation at the FCC UHF-RFID band (0.902–0.928 GHz). The corner-truncated square slot and patch are implemented to obtain CP modes at the MW-RFID band. The relative impedance bandwidths in the FCC UHF and MW band are 10.9% and 9.4%, respectively, with peak gains of 4.1 and 7.2 dBic. The antenna’s MIMO performance of envelope correlation coefficient (ECC) is lower than 0.01, and diversity gain (DG) is close to 10 dB. Thanks to the stack-up configuration, the dual-band RFID antenna realizes good antenna performance with a compact size of 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.07λ3.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Recently, the radio-frequency identification (RFID) technique is a widespread research tendency for some fields, such as biomedicine, traffic, and logistics, because of its practical and low-cost labeling advantage. The RFID operating band includes 125/135 kHz (low-frequency band, LF), 13.56 MHz (high-frequency band, HF), 433/860–960 MHz (ultrahigh-frequency band, UHF), and 2.45/5.8 GHz (microwave band, MW). The MW-band RFID system has unique technical superiorities of excellent transmitting rate and distance in a compact configuration for the active RFID technique.Furthermore, operating at multiple frequencies in compact RFID system has become a critical need to enhance efficiency. Some multiband (FCC UHF and MW bands) linear polarization (LP) solutions have been proposed in [1–4]. A pair of interlaced triangles has been embedded as a star slot in the center of the delta-shaped planar antenna to achieve multiband operation [1]. In [2], a dual-layer configuration with a hexagonal ring patch has been introduced. Finally, an aperture-fed and a marquise-brilliant-diamond-shaped (MBDS) structure are designed in [3, 4].Compared with LP antenna, CP antenna is more proper for RFID application due to its superiorities, such as detecting insensitivity of the physical orientations and reduced multipath fading. Some dual-band CP designs have been proposed, and most of them employed corner-truncated stack-up configurations [5–7] or slot-coupling structures [8, 9]. In [10], a pair of concentric ring antenna elements are activated with apertures for CP radiation and occupies the whole area of 0.5λ × 0.5λ. However, these single-feed solutions’ bandwidths are pretty narrow. Dual-band CP antennas with isolated ports are proposed in [11–16]. In [11–13], traditional phase-delay feeding networks and multiple radiation elements are employed for broad bandwidth and high port isolation. Two corner-chamfered patches and three substrates are stacked in [14] to achieve compact size. However, its axial ratio (AR) bandwidth in the higher band (7 GHz) is narrow (0.1 GHz). In [15], four inverted-F antennas (IFAs) and a 90° phase-delay feeding network are implemented for the FCC UHF-RFID band. A corner-truncated patch has been printed in the center of the IFAs for the second WLAN band. This solution has a compact volume of 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.05 λ3, but the maximum realized gains are low (−0.6 and 1.2 dBic) during its FCC RFID and WLAN bands. A dual-band CP RFID solution with separate Tx and Rx ports has been introduced with a dual-band metamaterial branch-line coupler [16]. Every port in its structure operates for both bands, leading to low isolation of 10 dB.Recently, RFID research focuses on multiple radiating elements in the reader and tag. Compared with the single-input-single-output (SISO) RFID system, the MIMO RFID system greatly enlarges the cover area, solves the non-line-of-sight (NLoS) problem, and obtains better data transmission and information-carrying capacity. Multiradiation-element has been firstly used for RFID systems in [17]. In [18], the SISO RFID and MIMO RFID channel’s multipath fading are compared, and the MIMO RFID technique can effectively enhance the fading depth. A distributed antenna system (DAS) for RFID is proposed to compare with a single-antenna RFID system [19]. When the DAS RFID system works in a 10 m2 space, it can obtain a successful reading rate of 100%. In comparison, the conventional SISO RFID system’s reading rate is lower than 60%. In [20], a 2 × 2 MIMO frontend for the RFID MIMO system verifies the RFID MIMO system’s superiority of beamforming, diversity combining, and localization at the RFID reader.So far, some relevant dual-band CP antennas or single-band CP MIMO antennas for RFID applications have been proposed [21, 22]. However, the dual-band CP MIMO solutions with independent-frequency ports for RFID systems are rare. Reference [23] duplicates its dual-feed dual-band CP RFID antenna elements for the 2 × 2 MIMO system and implements decoupling structures to enhance its port isolation. However, this solution significantly enlarged the overall dimensions and design complexity.This paper introduces a dual-band CP MIMO antenna for FCC UHF (0.902–0.928 GHz) and MW-RFID (2.4–2.485) system. The four-port configuration, consisting of four inverted-F monopoles fed with a 90° phase-delay feeding network and a corner-truncated patch fed with a square ring slot, can apply to 2 × 2 MIMO system without dimension increase. The novel contributions of the solution are summarized as follows:(i)
MW-RFID systems that work at 2.45 GHz have many superiorities, such as excellent reading range and speed and ample information storage. Nevertheless, the MW-RFID antenna’s design is more complex. Kinds of MW-RFID solutions have been introduced in [24–26]. However, all of them are designed for linear polarization (LP) with a single feed and cannot work at the second FCC UHF-RFID band. Since these two standards (0.915/2.45 GHz) need to operate simultaneously in one system, the four-feed dual-band antenna in this paper is necessary. Furthermore, compared to LP antennas in the RFID systems, the CP antenna has other advantages of decreased multipath fading and adaptability to extreme climatic conditions.(ii)
Traditional CP antennas with dual ports to transmit and receive simultaneously need complex and separated feeding networks for their multiple ports [27–29]. In this paper, a novel dual-port shared phase-delay feeding network, which consists of only two 90° hybrid couplers, has been proposed for the FCC UHF band. It can simultaneously achieve orthogonal-CP radiation fields to enhance port isolation in a more compact dimension. Moreover, most dual-band CP radiating elements need to duplicate their structure to realize MIMO function. This solution with two pairs of independent-band ports can directly apply for MIMO systems without any dimension increase.(iii)
Multifrequency antennas operating at FCC UHF/MW-RFID bands are essential for RFID systems. The MW-RFID reader can transmit collected data to a data processor with a wireless local area network (WLAN). Moreover, multifeed solutions can work as a receiving (RX) and transmitting (TX) antenna simultaneously and further apply to the Bluetooth and Wi-Fi application in industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) bands.The antenna design process is elucidated in Section2, and its simulated and measured results are compared in Section 3. The antenna’s application for the MIMO system is discussed in Section 4. Conclusions are proposed in Section 5.


## 2. Antenna Design

Figure1 shows the stack-up configuration’s layout that includes three 1.53 mm-thickness substrates. Layers 1 and 2 adopt FR 4 (ɛr = 4.3, tanδ = 0.025) substrate due to its good permittivity and cost performance. Since the feeding network has a critical need for low electromagnetic loss, Rogers Ro4350b (ɛr = 3.48, tan δ = 0.0037) is suitable as the feeding network’s substrate (Layer 3). Two feed lines and the radiating patch for the 2.45 GHz MW-RFID band are printed on the bottom side of Layers 2 and 1, respectively. A 90° phase-delay feeding network has been printed on Layer 3 to feed the four IFA elements for the CP field in the 0.915 GHz UHF-RFID band. All the inverted-F monopoles are on the top side of Layer 1.Figure 1
Antenna structure’s top view and side view.


### 2.1. FCC UHF-RFID (0.915 GHz) Feeding and Radiating Configuration

The CP field at the FCC UHF-RFID band has been realized through four inverted-F monopoles and a 90° phase-delay feeding network [16]. Four inverted-F monopoles are printed on Layer 1 top side with 90° clockwise rotation. The meandered monopoles have been employed to decrease the mutual interference with a compact size. Thus, the actual monopole length d2 reduces from 72 mm to 51 mm.Since the feeding network needs low electromagnetic loss, this solution adopts Rogers Ro4350b (ɛr = 3.48, tanδ = 0.0037) as Layer 3’s dielectric substrate. The phase-delay feeding network with four outputs has been printed on Layer 3’s top surface. The inherent four-section branch lines with Zc and Zd impedance values are utilized to form a conventional 90° hybrid coupler. Four groups of different-width (W4 and W5) branch lines with impedance values of Za and Zb are proposed to achieve dual-band impedance transformers from source impedance to load impedance. Since the different-width impedance transformer’s resonate frequencies are set close, a wide impedance bandwidth of the feeding network is realized. It should be noted that the four groups of branch lines are with the same electrical length (θ = 90°).Moreover, the 90° hybrid couplers’ input impedances are 100 Ω because of the parallel relation of the two couplers. The output impedances of Ports 3–6 are 50 Ω and can connect with standard radiating elements directly.As shown in Figure2, the inner and outer conductors of the coaxial line have been connected with the two input points of the ports, respectively. Thus, dual-way signals with the same amplitude as well as 180° phase difference have been transmitted to two 90° hybrid couplers. Each of the four outputs obtains a successive 90° phase offset to enhance CP purity. As confirmed by Figure 3, left-hand circular polarization (LHCP) and right-hand circular polarization (RHCP) have been realized with 90° phase progression in Ports 1 and 2, respectively. The orthogonal-CP mode can further enhance the port isolation in the FCC UHF band.Figure 2
90° phase-delay feeding network.Figure 3
Phase progression in (a) Port 1 to make up LHCP signal and (b) Port 2 to make up RHCP signal.
(a)(b)Four groups of pin headers are used to connect the feeding network and four inverted-F monopoles. Each group includes two pairs of pin headers. One pair of pin headers are used as a feed line (connects the monopole and the feeding network) and shorting line (connects the monopole and the ground plane), respectively. Another pair of isolated fixed pin headers has been employed for structure stabilization.Figure4 presents the S-parameters of the initial feeding network. The impedance bandwidth covers the entire 0.915 GHz band with the isolation of 20 dB, confirming the initial feeding network solution’s feasibility.Figure 4
S-parameters of the feeding network for FCC UHF-RFID band.


### 2.2. MW-RFID (2.45 GHz) Feeding and Radiating Configuration

The aperture coupling technique introduced by Pozar has some advantages such as shielding the antenna from feeding-network spurious radiation and broad bandwidth [30, 31]. Typically, square slots excited by microstrip lines are used to feed a printed patch antenna electromagnetically. Because the slot interrupts the longitudinal current flow, the coupling of the slot to the patch and the microstrip line’s dominant mode occurs. The ring slot structures have been introduced to feed the microstrip patch antenna [32–35]. Two-port linearly polarized patch antennas, especially, excited by a square ring slot are proposed in [32, 33]. Four dual-port linearly polarized aperture-coupled antennas are combined with a sequential rotation feeding technique to achieve an excellent polarization purity CP radiation field [34]. Moreover, a single-feed CP aperture-coupled square ring slot microstrip antenna has been proposed in [35]. The CP radiation field is realized with only one port by introducing a slight asymmetry in the square ring and patch geometries.In this paper, the proposed solution includes a dual-port dual-CP aperture-coupled microstrip patch excited by a ring slot. Different from [35], two orthogonal CP fields can be achieved by the same aperture-shared dual-port radiating element at 2.45 GHz RFID band without using bulky matching and phase-delay networks.As in ring-slot-coupling feeding techniques, the ringside lengthb3 has been set close to λ/4. Two orthogonal microstrip feeding lines are employed at two consecutive edges. A printed patch was then printed at a distance H1. Its side b2 is a little different from λ/2 to obtain a slightly different resonant frequency. The H1 is parametrically optimized together with the patch size to achieve resonance at the 2.45 GHz RFID band.Hence, an asymmetry has been introduced in both the ring slot and patch geometries to generate the CP field. Some different perturbations are proposed in the literature to excite the two orthogonal fundamental modes of a patch antenna. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that the diagonal fed a nearly square patch, the corner-truncated patch, and the square patch with peripheral cuts or tuning stub [36]. In this solution, two opposite corners of both the ring slot and resonant patch have been chamfered to obtain a corner-truncated configuration. The ground plane of 0.915 GHz feeding network from Layer 3 bottom can act as the metal reflector of 2.45 GHz radiating structure to reduce its backradiation and increase its gain.Employing the tapered-width feed line and nonuniform-width slot can further enhance the antenna’s S-parameter performance [37]. In Figure 5(a), as the increasing of stub terminal width a2, the antenna achieves a better impedance matching. The S11/S22 decreases from −8 to −12 dB. In Figure 5(b), thanks to the nonuniform-width slot structure, the S21 decreases from 18 dB to 27 dB in the MW-RFID band. At the same time, the S11 keeps stable and is lower than −10 dB.Figure 5
S-parameters comparison of (a) using different stub widtha2 and (b) employing nonuniform-width slot.
(a)(b)The surface current distribution when Ports 1–4 are excited has been proposed. As shown in Figure6, the surface currents focus on the feeding network and four meandered monopoles at Ports 1 and 2 modes. At Ports 3 and 4 modes, the surface currents focus on the tapered-width stub and the ring slot. Thus, a low coupling level between Ports 1 and 2 and Ports 3 and 4 has been realized. The structure parameters have been optimized and listed in Table 1.Figure 6
Surface current at Ports 1–4 modes: (a) Port 1 mode, 0.915 GHz, (b) Port 2 mode, 0.915 GHz, (c) Port 3 mode, 2.45 GHz, and (d) Port 4 mode, 2.45 GHz.Table 1
Structure parameters.
ParameterValue (mm)a0200a11.8a211.7b138.4b237b328.4c10.89c20.71d13d251W114.6W26.7W33.2W44.6W52.1W62Wc116.4Wc217.4L159.3L234.1L352.7L440.1L529.1L6100.5L728.3H113.8H29.3


## 2.1. FCC UHF-RFID (0.915 GHz) Feeding and Radiating Configuration

The CP field at the FCC UHF-RFID band has been realized through four inverted-F monopoles and a 90° phase-delay feeding network [16]. Four inverted-F monopoles are printed on Layer 1 top side with 90° clockwise rotation. The meandered monopoles have been employed to decrease the mutual interference with a compact size. Thus, the actual monopole length d2 reduces from 72 mm to 51 mm.Since the feeding network needs low electromagnetic loss, this solution adopts Rogers Ro4350b (ɛr = 3.48, tanδ = 0.0037) as Layer 3’s dielectric substrate. The phase-delay feeding network with four outputs has been printed on Layer 3’s top surface. The inherent four-section branch lines with Zc and Zd impedance values are utilized to form a conventional 90° hybrid coupler. Four groups of different-width (W4 and W5) branch lines with impedance values of Za and Zb are proposed to achieve dual-band impedance transformers from source impedance to load impedance. Since the different-width impedance transformer’s resonate frequencies are set close, a wide impedance bandwidth of the feeding network is realized. It should be noted that the four groups of branch lines are with the same electrical length (θ = 90°).Moreover, the 90° hybrid couplers’ input impedances are 100 Ω because of the parallel relation of the two couplers. The output impedances of Ports 3–6 are 50 Ω and can connect with standard radiating elements directly.As shown in Figure2, the inner and outer conductors of the coaxial line have been connected with the two input points of the ports, respectively. Thus, dual-way signals with the same amplitude as well as 180° phase difference have been transmitted to two 90° hybrid couplers. Each of the four outputs obtains a successive 90° phase offset to enhance CP purity. As confirmed by Figure 3, left-hand circular polarization (LHCP) and right-hand circular polarization (RHCP) have been realized with 90° phase progression in Ports 1 and 2, respectively. The orthogonal-CP mode can further enhance the port isolation in the FCC UHF band.Figure 2
90° phase-delay feeding network.Figure 3
Phase progression in (a) Port 1 to make up LHCP signal and (b) Port 2 to make up RHCP signal.
(a)(b)Four groups of pin headers are used to connect the feeding network and four inverted-F monopoles. Each group includes two pairs of pin headers. One pair of pin headers are used as a feed line (connects the monopole and the feeding network) and shorting line (connects the monopole and the ground plane), respectively. Another pair of isolated fixed pin headers has been employed for structure stabilization.Figure4 presents the S-parameters of the initial feeding network. The impedance bandwidth covers the entire 0.915 GHz band with the isolation of 20 dB, confirming the initial feeding network solution’s feasibility.Figure 4
S-parameters of the feeding network for FCC UHF-RFID band.


## 2.2. MW-RFID (2.45 GHz) Feeding and Radiating Configuration

The aperture coupling technique introduced by Pozar has some advantages such as shielding the antenna from feeding-network spurious radiation and broad bandwidth [30, 31]. Typically, square slots excited by microstrip lines are used to feed a printed patch antenna electromagnetically. Because the slot interrupts the longitudinal current flow, the coupling of the slot to the patch and the microstrip line’s dominant mode occurs. The ring slot structures have been introduced to feed the microstrip patch antenna [32–35]. Two-port linearly polarized patch antennas, especially, excited by a square ring slot are proposed in [32, 33]. Four dual-port linearly polarized aperture-coupled antennas are combined with a sequential rotation feeding technique to achieve an excellent polarization purity CP radiation field [34]. Moreover, a single-feed CP aperture-coupled square ring slot microstrip antenna has been proposed in [35]. The CP radiation field is realized with only one port by introducing a slight asymmetry in the square ring and patch geometries.In this paper, the proposed solution includes a dual-port dual-CP aperture-coupled microstrip patch excited by a ring slot. Different from [35], two orthogonal CP fields can be achieved by the same aperture-shared dual-port radiating element at 2.45 GHz RFID band without using bulky matching and phase-delay networks.As in ring-slot-coupling feeding techniques, the ringside lengthb3 has been set close to λ/4. Two orthogonal microstrip feeding lines are employed at two consecutive edges. A printed patch was then printed at a distance H1. Its side b2 is a little different from λ/2 to obtain a slightly different resonant frequency. The H1 is parametrically optimized together with the patch size to achieve resonance at the 2.45 GHz RFID band.Hence, an asymmetry has been introduced in both the ring slot and patch geometries to generate the CP field. Some different perturbations are proposed in the literature to excite the two orthogonal fundamental modes of a patch antenna. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that the diagonal fed a nearly square patch, the corner-truncated patch, and the square patch with peripheral cuts or tuning stub [36]. In this solution, two opposite corners of both the ring slot and resonant patch have been chamfered to obtain a corner-truncated configuration. The ground plane of 0.915 GHz feeding network from Layer 3 bottom can act as the metal reflector of 2.45 GHz radiating structure to reduce its backradiation and increase its gain.Employing the tapered-width feed line and nonuniform-width slot can further enhance the antenna’s S-parameter performance [37]. In Figure 5(a), as the increasing of stub terminal width a2, the antenna achieves a better impedance matching. The S11/S22 decreases from −8 to −12 dB. In Figure 5(b), thanks to the nonuniform-width slot structure, the S21 decreases from 18 dB to 27 dB in the MW-RFID band. At the same time, the S11 keeps stable and is lower than −10 dB.Figure 5
S-parameters comparison of (a) using different stub widtha2 and (b) employing nonuniform-width slot.
(a)(b)The surface current distribution when Ports 1–4 are excited has been proposed. As shown in Figure6, the surface currents focus on the feeding network and four meandered monopoles at Ports 1 and 2 modes. At Ports 3 and 4 modes, the surface currents focus on the tapered-width stub and the ring slot. Thus, a low coupling level between Ports 1 and 2 and Ports 3 and 4 has been realized. The structure parameters have been optimized and listed in Table 1.Figure 6
Surface current at Ports 1–4 modes: (a) Port 1 mode, 0.915 GHz, (b) Port 2 mode, 0.915 GHz, (c) Port 3 mode, 2.45 GHz, and (d) Port 4 mode, 2.45 GHz.Table 1
Structure parameters.
ParameterValue (mm)a0200a11.8a211.7b138.4b237b328.4c10.89c20.71d13d251W114.6W26.7W33.2W44.6W52.1W62Wc116.4Wc217.4L159.3L234.1L352.7L440.1L529.1L6100.5L728.3H113.8H29.3


## 3. Antenna Performance and Discussion

The proposed antenna has been prototyped and measured. Its figures of two FR 4 substrates and one Rogers Ro4350b substrate are shown in Figure7. As shown in Figure 8, the numerical and experimental S-parameters demonstrate a good agreement. The measured −10 dB bandwidths are in the range of 0.875–0.975 GHz (10.9%) and 2.37–2.6 GHz (9.4%), which cover the entire FCC UHF/MW-RFID operating band (0.902–0.928 and 2.4–2.485). As shown in Figure 9, all different-band port isolations (|S31|, |S41|, |S32|, and |S42|) are higher than 25 dB because of the proper distance between the corner-truncated patch and inverted-F monopoles. In addition, both the monopole element (working at 0.915 GHz) and slot-coupling element (working at 2.45 GHz) are single frequency radiating configurations without broad bandwidth, and their electrical sizes have a noticeable difference for their different resonate frequencies. Thus, sound isolations have been realized between the antenna elements without any decoupling structures. However, due to the slight reflection in the connection position between the pin headers and the radiation monopoles, there is little same-band port isolation (|S21|) deterioration during the FCC UHF band in Figure 9(a). Thus, the 20 dB isolations are obtained among all required bands.Figure 7
Antenna prototype.Figure 8
Simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the antenna.Figure 9
Simulated and measured isolation of (a) same-band ports and (b) different-band ports.
(a)(b)In the center of Figure10, the proposed fabrication has been measured in the anechoic chamber. The measured radiation patterns are compared with simulated results in the XZ and YZ planes at 0.915 and 2.45 GHz. The proposed antenna realizes LHCP when Ports 1 and 3 are excited, and the cross-polarizations (RHCP) are better than −20 dB and −18 dB around the broadside (z-axis) at Ports 1 and 3, respectively. RHCP is realized when Ports 2 and 4 are excited, and the cross-polarizations (LHCP) at Ports 2 and 4 are lower than −20 dB and −17 dB around the broadside, respectively. The half-power bandwidths (HPBW) are about 75° at 0.915 GHz (Ports 1 and 2) and 50°at 2.45 GHz for broadside cases in XZ and YZ planes. The maximum measured realized gains in the broadside direction are 4.1 dBic in 0.915 FCC UHF-RFID band for Ports 1 and 2, and 7.2 dBic in 2.45 GHz MW-RFID band for both Ports 3 and 4.Figure 10
Simulated and measured normalized radiation patterns at Ports 1 and 2 (0.915 GHz) and Ports 3 and 4 (2.44 GHz) inXZ and YZ planes.The axial ratio (AR) for broadside cases has been measured with a 20 MHz frequency step. As shown in Figure11, the numerical and experimental AR exhibits a reasonable agreement. The measured 3-dB ARBWs are 0.83–0.96 GHz (14.2%) and 2.37–2.55 GHz (7.4%), covering the required UHF/MW-RFID bands.Figure 11
Simulated and measured axial ratio.The results of both the measured and simulated AR variations versus theθ-angle are shown in Figures 12 and 13. In the 0.915 GHz UHF-RFID band, the measured 3-dB AR beam widths are 60° and 45° at Port 1 mode and Port 2 mode, respectively. The cross-polar level is slightly higher during the 2.45 GHz band with clear peaks around θ = ±60°, especially in Port 4. The measured 3-dB AR beam widths are 44° at Port 3 mode and 30° at Port 4 mode because of surface-wave diffraction at the edges of the dielectric slab [13]. The diffraction from the dielectric layer’s edges also occurs in the lower band but is less severe due to the small dielectric layer’s relative thickness. If the configuration is designed in a more extensive laminate, the surface waves’ effect will reduce. Thus, a trade-off between the antenna miniaturization and the achievable AR beam width has been considered to guarantee an acceptable RFID tag reading coverage. Furthermore, the electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) technique can also decrease the effect of diffraction [38].Figure 12
Simulated and measured axial ratio as a function ofθ angle from the broadside, in the XZ and YZ planes at 0.915 GHz: (a) Port 1 and (b) Port 2.
(a)(b)Figure 13
Simulated and measured axial ratio as a function ofθ angle from the broadside, in the XZ and YZ planes at 2.45 GHz: (a) Port 3 and (b) Port 4.
(a)(b)


## 4. Application for MIMO System

The ECC and DG are the MIMO system’s critical performance index. In consideration of the antenna’s spatial influence, the ECC can be estimated from the far-field radiation pattern by the following [39]:(1)ρe=∬4πE1⟶θ,ϕ⋅E2⟶θ,ϕdΩ2∬4πE1⟶θ,ϕ2dΩ∬4πE2⟶θ,ϕ2dΩ,(2)DG=101−0.99ρe2The calculated ECC and DG are proposed in Figure14. The ECC during the requiring band meets the criterion of 0.01 [37], which means that similar channel capacities are realized for both spatial and polarization diversity. Thus, the proposed antenna can be employed for MIMO application with polarization diversity of both same-band ports (Ports 1 and 2 in UHF band and Ports 3 and 4 in MW band). The DG gets closer to its theoretical maximum value of 10 dB and ensures good MIMO performance.Figure 14
Calculated ECC and DG.Table2 compares the proposed solution with other relevant dual-band CP antenna solutions. Compared with dual-band CP RFID solutions ([9, 10, 15, 16]), this solution has a more balanced and excellent performance. Moreover, most dual-band CP solutions need to duplicate their structures for MIMO applications, significantly increasing their whole dimensions. Considering MIMO application, [21, 22] are the multiband CP MIMO antennas, but each port in their solutions needs to work for multiple operating bands. Notably, the dual-band antennas working simultaneously with separated single-band ports (each port work in only one required band) are always necessary for the MIMO system [23]. The solution in this paper achieves dual-band CP simultaneous operation with two pairs of single-band ports and occupies a more compact dimension. Thus, the proposed solution is better for the dual-band RFID 2 × 2 MIMO system compared with other solutions.Table 2
Performance comparison with other proposed dual-band multiport CP antenna systems.
Ref.Size [λ3]Ports and polarizationBands (GHz)IBW (%)ARBW (%)Isolation (dB)Gain [dBic]ECC[9]0.6 × 0.6 × 0.09One port0.9152.65.3—2.9—Same sense2.45226.1[10]0.5 × 0.5 × 0.04One port0.924.84.8—6.5—Dual-sense2.4516.716.77[15]0.6 × 0.6 × 0.05Two ports0.9152.82.825−0.6—Same sense2.453.20.8201.2[16]0.7 × 0.7 × 0.1Two ports0.923.44.4106.6—Dual-sense2.4578.2107.9[21]∗0.9 × 0.6 × 0.01Two ports2.4520—20—0.5Dual-sense3.518.85165.315.2—18[22]0.8 × 0.2 × 0.01Two ports2.4536361560.0001Dual-sense5.81717202.60.0001[23]1.1 × 0.5 × 0.11Four ports2.4512.73.5257.30.03Dual-sense5.85.16.2307.30.03This work0.6 × 0.6 × 0.07Four ports0.91510.914.2204.10.01Dual-sense2.459.47.4257.40.01∗The radiating elements radiate two orthogonal LP fields at the WLAN band and CP field in the range 3.31–3.48 GHz (within the WiMAX band). Antenna performance here indicated refers to the WiMAX band, where a CP MIMO system is obtained.


## 5. Conclusions

A compact, four-port, dual-band, dual-CP antenna for UHF/MW-RFID MIMO systems has been introduced, prototyped, and characterized. Shared-aperture and nonuniform-width slot has been designed for the MW-RFID band to increase the isolation and impedance matching. Thanks to the four inverted-F meandered monopoles and phase-delay feeding network, the antenna can obtain the second FCC UHF-RFID working band with a compact overall dimension. The measured antenna performance of S-parameters, AR, radiation pattern, and realized gain agree with the simulated results. Good ECC and DG performance demonstrate that the proposed solution is suitable for dual-band CP RFID MIMO applications.



---

*Source: 2118059-2021-08-30.xml*