# Miniaturized High-Isolation Dual-Frequency Orthogonally

Authors: Chunxia Cheng; Fushun Zhang; Yangtao Wan; Fan Zhang
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

A miniaturized dual-frequency dual-polarization microstrip patch antenna with high isolation between receiving and transmitting ports (operating at 2.1 GHz for receiving and at 2.5 GHz for transmitting) is presented in this paper. The proposed antenna consists of a modified rectangular radiating patch, two 50 Ω microstrip feed lines, and two EBG filters. Two coupling microstrip lines are employed to excite two orthogonal fundamental modes (TM10 and TM01). The high isolation is achieved by embedding two novel EBG filters underneath two feed lines to reject the incoming signal from the opposite line. Multilayer configuration, miniaturized EBG filters, and modified rectangular radiation patch contribute to size reduction. The total size is 0.67λ× 0.67λ× 0.03λ, only quarter of the multilayer rectangular radiation patch antenna (1.33λ× 1.33λ× 0.03λ) using common EBG filters with the same performance. Measured results on the reflection coefficients, isolations, and gains for the two frequencies are provided, which agree well with the numerical simulations. Also, measured isolations and radiation patterns at both two resonant frequencies are compared with the antenna without filters. The results show that the proposed method improves isolation by more than 20 dB with little influence on the radiation patterns.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dual-frequency dual-polarization antennas are often required for frequency reuse to enhance communication system capacities. The dual-frequency operation of the antennas can provide frequency diversity and dual-polarization operation can enhance the information content by providing two copolarization and two cross-polarization scatter data. For microstrip patch antennas, dual-frequency dual-polarization can be easily realized by using a pair of feeds to, respectively, excite two orthogonal fundamental modes from a single radiating patch; however, this type of antenna has a poor isolation between two exciting ports. To improve the port isolation, several studies have been done by employing different feeding structures [1–5]. In [1], port isolation levels in the range of 25 dB to 32 dB for each band were achieved by using a differential feeding mechanism. By placing defected ground structure (DGS) under the feed line, port isolation can be improved by 20 dB [2, 3], but DGS suffer from increasing in back radiation. A shielding plane could be used to suppress the back radiation, although this could affect the antenna performance due to parallel plate modes propagation. Adding filter particles to the feeding structure is also a suitable method to increase the port isolation [4, 5]. In [4], two filters based on electromagnetic bandgap structures (EBGs) have been investigated in order to increase the isolation. However, both filters are larger than 0.3
λ. Moreover, both filters must be put 0.17
λ away from the radiation patch. Two filters based on spiral defected microstrip structures (DMS) are used to enhance the ports isolation [5]. Although both DMS filters are compact near 0.1
λ, two quarter-wave-length transformers are needed to match the antenna impedance. So the total size of the DMS filter and the match particle is larger than 0.35
λ.There are two ways to solve the problem above: reduce the filter size or minimize the distance between the filter and patch. Structure miniaturization of EBG resonator is achieved practically by modifying via or the shape of the patch, such as edge-located via [6], etching CSRR on a conventional mushroom-type EBG [7]. For the purpose of further size reduction, etching dual U-shaped slots on symmetrically with respect to one axis of the edge-located vias mushroom-type EBG (DAU-EBG) is proposed [8]. Using multilayer structure and modified patch, the distance between the filter and patch can be reduced.In this paper, a miniaturized dual-frequency dual-polarization microstrip patch antenna with high isolation is presented. A novel EBG filter with a compact size of0.18
λ
×
0.06
λ is embedded underneath the feed line to enhance the isolation between receiving and transmitting ports. The isolation is improved by 20 dB compared to the antenna without filters. Moreover, using multilayer structure and removing four trapezoids from the four edges of the rectangular patch, the spaces between filters and patch edge are smaller than 0.02
λ for both ports. So the total size of the DEP-EBG filter and the spaces between filter and patch is smaller than 0.2
λ. The total size of the proposed antenna is 0.67
λ
×
0.67
λ
×
0.03
λ, which is smaller than that of the antenna (1.33
λ
×
1.33
λ
×
0.03
λ) in [4].


## 2. Compact DEP-EBG Filter

The conventional mushroom-type EBG (CMT-EBG), which is shown in Figure1(a), can be characterized by an equivalent parallel LC resonator with a resonant frequency of f
r
=
1
/
2
π
LC. Compared with the CMT-EBG, the edge-located vias mushroom-type EBG (ELV-EBG) (Figure 1(b)) designed based on the concepts of LC resonator and λ
/
4 horizontal corrugation soft surface [9] has a reduced size (with a limited miniaturization). For the purpose of further size reduction, a novel EBG is proposed. As shown in Figure 1(c) it is based on an ELV-EBG with dual E-shaped patch (DEP) symmetrically with respect to the Y-direction. As the DEP-EBG structure makes better use of the patch area to increase the current patch, the resonant frequency (f
r), that is, the bandgap, is greatly brought down.Geometries of the EBG. (a) CMT-EBG, (b) ELV-EBG, and (c) DEP-EBG.
(a)
(b)
(c)To quantitatively show the advantages of the proposed DEP-EBG structure, two filters consisting of three-cell DEP-EBG that have the same stopband as [4] are designed and studied for comparison. Filter 1 has a stopband in the proximity of 2.5 GHz (f
1) and filter 2 shows a stopband near 2.1 GHz (f
2). Both filters are designed on a two-layer substrate with relative permittivity ε
r
=
4.5 and heights h
1
=
0.4 mm h
2
=
1.5 mm as shown in Figure 2. The 50 Ω microstrip lines are 3.85 mm for both cases on the front surface of the two-layer substrate. The three-cell DEP-EBG filter is underneath the 50 Ω microstrip line on the surface of the lower-layer substrate and the cell is connected to the ground plane through a via. The characteristics of the two filters have been calculated using HFSS 13. The optimized parameters for filter 1 are W
=
7.15 mm, L
=
6.5 mm, W
0
=
0.9 mm, W
1
=
0.8 mm, and L
1
=
3.01 mm and for filter 2, W
=
8.4 mm, L
=
8.7 mm, W
0
=
1.7 mm, W
1
=
0.92 mm, and L
1
=
3.92 mm. The unit sizes of the reference CMT-EBG filters are 11.7 mm × 11.7 mm and 13.9 mm × 13.9 mm for filter 1 and filter 2, respectively. The gap between resonators is g
=
0.5 mm and the radius of via is r
=
0.2 mm in all filters. So, the total sizes of the DEP-EBG filters are 0.16
λ
1
×
0.05
λ
1 and 0.18
λ
2
×
0.06
λ
2. While the sizes of the CMT-EBG filters are 0.30
λ
1
×
0.10
λ
1 and 0.30
λ
2
×
0.10
λ
2, the sizes of the DEP-EBG filters are only 53% and 60% of the reference CMT-EBG filters.Figure 2
Figures of the three-cell DEP-EBG filters.Figure3 shows the simulated frequency response of the DEP-EBG filters compared with the reference CMT-EBG filters. The 2.1 GHz CMT-EBG and DEP-EBG filters performances are 20 dB stopband: 5.71% and 3.62%, minimum insertion loss in stopband: −32 dB and −31 dB. The performances of both 2.5 GHz filters are 20 dB stopband: 6.56% and 3.56%, minimum insertion loss in stopband: −32 dB and −32 dB. Although the 20 dB stopbands of DEP-EBG filters are narrower than CMT-EBG filters, they can be improved by increasing h
1. As shown in Figure 3, when h
1 increases to 0.65 mm the 20 dB stopbands of 2.1 GHz and 2.5 GHz DEP-EBG filters are 6.09% and 6.52%, respectively.Simulation results of the CMT-EBG and DEP-EBG filters.
(a)
2.1 GHz
(b)
2.5 GHz


## 3. Compact High-Isolation Antenna

The dual-frequency dual-polarization antenna with high isolation is designed to operate at 2.1 GHz for port 1 and 2.5 GHz for port 2. The geometry of the proposed antenna is shown in Figure4. This antenna is composed of a rectangular patch cutting off trapezoid in every side on the front surface of layer 3, feeding lines on the front surface of layer 2, DEP-EBG filters on the front surface of layer 1, and a conductor ground plane in the back of layer 1. The antenna ground plane size is 100
×
100 mm2, which is only 25% of the reference antenna proposed in [4]. The modified rectangular patch dimensions are A
1
=
44.3 mm and B
1
=
36.5 mm and the trapezoids dimensions are B
2
=
7 mm, h
1
=
8 mm, A
2
=
9.5 mm, and h
2
=
7 mm. By removing four trapezoids from the four edges of the rectangular patch, the distances between the edge of filters and the vertex of patch are −1 mm and 2.9 mm for filter 1 and filter 2, respectively, smaller than 0.02
λ. So a compact design is achieved. The width of 50 Ω feed lines is W
feed
=
3.85 mm for both ports. The length of the horizontal feed line is L
2
=
58.75 mm and the distance between port 2 and filter 2 is L
5
=
6.85 mm. The length of vertical feed line is L
1
=
51.3 mm and the distance between port 1 and filter 1 is L
4
=
9.58 mm. The line-patch overlap of the horizontal feed line is larger than B
1
/
2, and according to [4] port 2 is matching. Because both feed lines are in the same layer underneath the center of the patch, the length of the vertical feed line is shorter than A
1
/
2 and port 1 does not match. So a simple matching network is added to the vertically feed line by modifying the width to 6 mm with a length of 12 mm, and the distance between the modifying feed line and the open end is 1.5 mm. Filter 2 is placed underneath the horizontal feed line to reject the input signal from port 1 and filter 1 underneath the vertical feed line to avoid propagation at the input signal from port 2. The stopbands of filters are shifted due to the presence of the antenna, and by simply modifying the length L
1 to 2.94 mm and 4.03 mm and the length W to 7.5 mm and 8 mm for filter 1 and filter 2 the stopbands move to 2.5 GHz and 2.1 GHz. To validate our design, the compact high-isolation dual-frequency antenna is fabricated according to the previous parameters, as shown in Figure 5. The total size of the DEP-EBG filter antenna is only quarter of the CMT-EBG filter antenna in [4].Configuration of the proposed antenna. (a) Top view. (b) Side view.
(a)
(b)Photograph of the proposed antenna. (a) Top view of the antenna, (b) top view of the feed line, and (c) top view of the DEP-EBG.
(a)
(b)
(c)The measured and simulatedS-parameter results of the two ports are depicted in Figure 6. It can be seen from Figure 6 that port 1 achieves 10 dB return loss bandwidth around 2.14% (2.079–2.124 GHz) and port 2 around 2.84% (2.463–2.534 GHz). More than 20 dB improvement in isolation between the two ports was obtained at the two frequency bands compared to the same antenna without filters, approaching minimum isolation around 48 dB within both bands in the DEP-EBG filters integrated antenna.Measured and simulatedS parameters of DEP-EBG filters antenna. (a) Reflection coefficient. (b) Isolation.
(a)
(b)Figures7 and 8 show the antenna radiation patterns in the E-plane and H-plane for the DEP-EBG filters integrated antennas and the same antenna without filters. The co- and cross-polarized radiation patterns in E-plane and H-plane at both frequencies are shown. The antenna radiation patterns were measured with one port excitation and the other port connected to the matched load. It can be seen that the cross-polarization within the half-space above the ground plane remains less than −20 dB in the two planes at both resonant frequencies. The radiation patterns are almost the same as for the same patch antenna without filters. As expected, the DEP-EBG filters close to radiation patch do not affect the radiation properties of the proposed antenna.Measured radiation pattern for port 1 (2.1 GHz). (a) E-plane (y-z plane), (b) H-plane (x-z plane).
(a)
(b)Measured radiation pattern for port 2 (2.5 GHz). (a) E-plane (x-z plane), (b) H-plane (y-z plane).
(a)
(b)The simulated and measured gains of the proposed antenna for the two ports are plotted in Figure9. As seen, good agreement between simulation and measurement is observed. The obtained average gains are 6.46 dBi and 6.85 dBi within the 2.1 and 2.5 GHz operating bands, respectively. It is clearly seen that the proposed antenna achieves stable gain within the two operating bands.Figure 9
Measured and simulated gains of proposed antenna.


## 4. Conclusion

In this work, a compact dual-frequency dual-polarization antenna with high isolation has been successfully implemented and discussed. The high isolation is achieved by embedding two DEP-EBG filters underneath two feed lines to reject the incoming signal from the opposite line. The size of the compact DEP-EBG filters does not exceed 60% that of the CMT-EBG filters. By using a multilayer configuration, two compact DEP-EBG filters, and modified rectangular radiation patch, the size of the proposed antenna is only quarter that of the reference antenna in [4]. Measurement results show that the proposed method improves isolation to higher than 48 dB at both frequency bands. Furthermore, radiation patterns are almost not affected by the DEP-EBG filters close to the radiation patch. The simplicity and compactness of the design makes it desirable for practical application in dual-frequency dual-polarization communication systems.



---

*Source: 230316-2014-04-17.xml*