# Compact Wideband Circularly Polarized Antenna with Symmetric Parasitic Rectangular Patches for Ka-Band Applications

Authors: Rongling Jian; Yueyun Chen; Taohua Chen
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

In this paper, a novel wideband circularly polarized (CP) millimeter wave (mmWave) microstrip antenna is presented. The proposed antenna consists of a central patch and a microstrip line radiator. The CP radiation is achieved by loading a rectangular slot on the ground plane. To improve the 3-dB axial ratio bandwidth (ARBW), two symmetric parasitic rectangular patches paralleled to a central patch and a slit positioned to the right of the central patch are loaded. To verify this design, the proposed antenna is fabricated with a small antenna of 2.88× 3.32 × 0.508 mm3. The measured impedance bandwidth (IMBW) for S11<−10dB of the proposed antenna is 35.97% (22.8 to 33.8 GHz). Meanwhile, the simulation result shows that the 3-dB ARBW is 15.19% (28.77 to 33.5 GHz) within impedance bandwidth, and the peak gain is from 5.08 to 5.22 dBic within 3-dB ARBW. The proposed antenna is suitable for CP applications in the Ka-band.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

With the rapid development of the 5th generation (5G) wireless communication, circularly polarized (CP) antennas have received increasing attention because they can overcome multipath interferences, polarization mismatch, and Faraday rotation effects [1–5]. However, the study of bandwidth enhancement of the CP antenna in the Ka-band is an open issue.In recent years, many technologies were proposed to enhance CP antenna bandwidth such as loading parasitic strips or protruding stub [6–9], loading slots or slits [10–13], and cavity model-based methodology [14, 15]. Patch antennas with parasitic strips and ring patches are presented for wideband circular polarization [6, 7]. Through protruding a horizontal stub from the ground plane, the 3-dB axial ratio bandwidth (ARBW) is enhanced [8]. A hybrid Z-shaped cylindrical resonator antenna for multiband applications is proposed in [9]. Meanwhile, by loading a lightning-shaped slot for achieving good CP radiation, an annular-slot dual-broadband CP antenna is achieved [10]. The 3-dB ARBW is enhanced by cutting a rectangular slit [11] and moving the feeding ports to the upper portion of the U-shaped slot [12]. To achieve CP radiation and antenna size reduction, an arrow-head-shaped slot is embedded in a square patch [13]. In addition, the CP antenna is designed by cavity model-based methodology. An omnidirectional dual-band dual-CP antenna with wide beam radiation patterns using TM01 and TM02 modes is investigated in [14]. A new CP antenna design method based cavity model-based methodology is proposed in [15].To achieve a broadband CP antenna in mmWave, the aperture antenna [16–18], waveguide antenna [19], and patch antenna [20] are proposed. However, these antennas have more complex geometry, larger size, or higher loss at the feed network due to the resistors. In [16], a differentially fed CP planar aperture antenna is proposed for broadband mmWave applications, and the 3-dB ARBW is set to 16.7% (56 to 66.2 GHz) within its impedance bandwidth. The differentially driven planar aperture CP antenna is proposed to improve gain and expand the 3-dB ARBW to 17.9% (56.5 to 67.5 GHz) [17]. The CP antenna is proposed through addition of a hybrid microstrip and elliptical dielectric ring resonator, and the 3-dB ARBW is set to 10% (56 to 62 GHz) [18]. Due to many advantages, such as simple feeding, easy manufacture, precise control of aperture distribution, and low loss, the slotted waveguide antenna has found wide applications in wireless communications. A CP waveguide antenna is presented for Ka-band applications [19]. The L-shaped patch and a tapered elliptical cavity CP antenna are proposed, and the 3-dB ARBW is set to 11.9% (56.9 to 64 GHz) [20].The purpose of this paper is to develop a CP antenna with bandwidth enhancement, which can be used in a Ka-band wireless communication system. With careful design of the rectangular slot on the ground plane, equal amplitude and 90° phase difference between two orthogonal polarizations can be achieved, leading to a circular polarization at the design frequency. To enhance bandwidth of proposed antenna, two symmetric parasitic rectangular patches are loaded, which are parallel to the central patch, and a slit is loaded to the right of the central patch.The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Antenna design and analysis, including the proposed antenna structure, steps of the proposed antenna, and parameter studies, is described in Section2. The antenna design results are presented in Section 3. Conclusion is drawn in Section 4.


## 2. Antenna Design and Analysis

### 2.1. Antenna Structure

The configuration of the proposed antenna is shown in Figure1. This antenna is printed on a rectangular Rogers RT/Duroid 5880 substrate, where height (h) is 0.508mm, dielectric constant (εr) is 2.2 and dielectric loss tangent is 0.0009. It consists of a microstrip line feeding port, ground plane with a rectangular slot, two parasitic rectangular patches, and a slit loaded in the central patch. The size of total patches is l2×w2 = 2.88 × 3.32mm2 [21]. The CP wave is generated by two orthogonal electric field vectors with equal amplitude and 90° phase difference, which is mainly implemented by loading a rectangular slot on the ground plane. The 3-dB ARBW is enhanced by loading two symmetric parasitic rectangular patches paralleled to the central patch and a slit positioned to the right of the central patch. The parameters of the proposed antenna are shown in Table 1.Figure 1
The geometries of the proposed CP antenna.Table 1
The parameters of the proposed antenna structure.
Parameters
Value (mm)
l
1
5.76
w
1
6.64
l
11
3
w
11
3.32
l
2
2.88
w
2
3.32
l
22
0.26
l
24
1.44
w
21
1.84
w
22
0.6
w
23
0.75
w
24
0.6
w
25
0.8
l
23
0.88


### 2.2. Steps of the Proposed Antenna

The four antenna evolutions of the broadband Ka-band CP antenna are depicted in Figure2 to explain the design process of bandwidth enhancement. In this paper, all the simulations are performed by Ansoft High Frequency Structure Simulator (version 13.0) based on the finite element method.Figure 2
Steps to realize the proposed antenna. (a) ANT.1. (b) ANT 2. (c) ANT.3. (d) ANT.4.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)ANT.1 includes a basic rectangular patch and feed structure, which has received much attention in array applications [22]. As shown in Figure 3, ANT.1 has the disadvantage of narrow bandwidth, and it is linearly polarized (LP). In ANT.2, the CP radiation is achieved by loading a rectangular slot on the ground plane. Meanwhile, the impedance bandwidth (IBW) of ANT.2 is enhanced because input impedance is changed after loading the rectangular slot. However, the 3-dB AR bandwidth is poor. Wide ARBW is achieved by loading two symmetric parasitic rectangular patches paralleled to the central patch in ANT.3, and it is shown from Figure 4 that the 3-dB ARBW is from 2.2 to 3.1 GHz. The ARBW is further enhanced by loading a small slit positioned to the right of the central patch in ANT.4. Figure 5 shows the simulated peak gain for ANT.1, ANT.2, and ANT.3 within the ARBW.Figure 3
SimulatedS11 for ANT.1, ANT.2, and ANT.3.Figure 4
Simulated AR for ANT.1, ANT.2, and ANT.3.Figure 5
Simulated peak gain for ANT.1, ANT.2, and ANT.3.


### 2.3. Parameter Studies

In order to clearly understand the design rules of the proposed antenna, a set of parameters, including the change in the width of rectangular slots on the patch (w22), the length of the slit (w23), and the feeding position (w25), will be discussed in this section. Meanwhile, the width of the central rectangular slot is decided by w22. Note that when one parameter is studied, the other parameters are fixed as listed in Table 1.By adjusting the width of rectangular slots on the patch (w22), the width of the central patch is also changed. As shown in Figure 6, the IMBW is expanded from 32.61% (23.48 GHz to 31.46 GHz) to 35.42% (24.11 GHz to 34.49 GHz) with the increase of w22 from 0.4 to 0.6 mm. However, the IMBW is reduced with the increase of w22 from 0.6 to 0.7 mm. As shown in Figure 7, the 3-dB ARBW is enhanced with the increase of w22 from 0.4 to 0.6 mm. However, ANT.4 becomes LP when w22 is from 0.6 to 0.7 mm. In this paper, we choose w22 = 0.6 mm for the proposed CP antenna design.Figure 6
Effects of variousw22 on S11.Figure 7
Effects of variousw22 on AR.Figure8 shows the simulated results of ANT.4 with the length of w23 from 0.45 to 0.9 mm. It can be seen from Figure 8 that the IMBW is increased as w23 increases from 0 to 0.75 mm. However, the IMBW is reduced with the increase of w23 from 0.75 to 0.9 mm. Meanwhile, it can be seen from Figure 9 that the 3-dB ARBW is also increased as w23 increases from 0.45 to 0.75 mm. However, the IMBW is reduced with the increase of w23 from 0.75 to 0.9 mm. With the analysis above, we choose w23 = 0.75 mm for the proposed CP antenna design.Figure 8
Effects of variousw23 on S11.Figure 9
Effects of variousw23 on AR.Through analysis, the effects of feeding position on impedance matching and feeding position (w25) can be decided. When the feeding position is studied, the other parameters are fixed as listed in Table 1. It is discovered from Figures 10 and 11 that it can achieve better impedance matching when w25 is 0.8 mm.Figure 10
Effects of variousw25 on S11.Figure 11
Effects of variousw25 on AR.


## 2.1. Antenna Structure

The configuration of the proposed antenna is shown in Figure1. This antenna is printed on a rectangular Rogers RT/Duroid 5880 substrate, where height (h) is 0.508mm, dielectric constant (εr) is 2.2 and dielectric loss tangent is 0.0009. It consists of a microstrip line feeding port, ground plane with a rectangular slot, two parasitic rectangular patches, and a slit loaded in the central patch. The size of total patches is l2×w2 = 2.88 × 3.32mm2 [21]. The CP wave is generated by two orthogonal electric field vectors with equal amplitude and 90° phase difference, which is mainly implemented by loading a rectangular slot on the ground plane. The 3-dB ARBW is enhanced by loading two symmetric parasitic rectangular patches paralleled to the central patch and a slit positioned to the right of the central patch. The parameters of the proposed antenna are shown in Table 1.Figure 1
The geometries of the proposed CP antenna.Table 1
The parameters of the proposed antenna structure.
Parameters
Value (mm)
l
1
5.76
w
1
6.64
l
11
3
w
11
3.32
l
2
2.88
w
2
3.32
l
22
0.26
l
24
1.44
w
21
1.84
w
22
0.6
w
23
0.75
w
24
0.6
w
25
0.8
l
23
0.88


## 2.2. Steps of the Proposed Antenna

The four antenna evolutions of the broadband Ka-band CP antenna are depicted in Figure2 to explain the design process of bandwidth enhancement. In this paper, all the simulations are performed by Ansoft High Frequency Structure Simulator (version 13.0) based on the finite element method.Figure 2
Steps to realize the proposed antenna. (a) ANT.1. (b) ANT 2. (c) ANT.3. (d) ANT.4.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)ANT.1 includes a basic rectangular patch and feed structure, which has received much attention in array applications [22]. As shown in Figure 3, ANT.1 has the disadvantage of narrow bandwidth, and it is linearly polarized (LP). In ANT.2, the CP radiation is achieved by loading a rectangular slot on the ground plane. Meanwhile, the impedance bandwidth (IBW) of ANT.2 is enhanced because input impedance is changed after loading the rectangular slot. However, the 3-dB AR bandwidth is poor. Wide ARBW is achieved by loading two symmetric parasitic rectangular patches paralleled to the central patch in ANT.3, and it is shown from Figure 4 that the 3-dB ARBW is from 2.2 to 3.1 GHz. The ARBW is further enhanced by loading a small slit positioned to the right of the central patch in ANT.4. Figure 5 shows the simulated peak gain for ANT.1, ANT.2, and ANT.3 within the ARBW.Figure 3
SimulatedS11 for ANT.1, ANT.2, and ANT.3.Figure 4
Simulated AR for ANT.1, ANT.2, and ANT.3.Figure 5
Simulated peak gain for ANT.1, ANT.2, and ANT.3.


## 2.3. Parameter Studies

In order to clearly understand the design rules of the proposed antenna, a set of parameters, including the change in the width of rectangular slots on the patch (w22), the length of the slit (w23), and the feeding position (w25), will be discussed in this section. Meanwhile, the width of the central rectangular slot is decided by w22. Note that when one parameter is studied, the other parameters are fixed as listed in Table 1.By adjusting the width of rectangular slots on the patch (w22), the width of the central patch is also changed. As shown in Figure 6, the IMBW is expanded from 32.61% (23.48 GHz to 31.46 GHz) to 35.42% (24.11 GHz to 34.49 GHz) with the increase of w22 from 0.4 to 0.6 mm. However, the IMBW is reduced with the increase of w22 from 0.6 to 0.7 mm. As shown in Figure 7, the 3-dB ARBW is enhanced with the increase of w22 from 0.4 to 0.6 mm. However, ANT.4 becomes LP when w22 is from 0.6 to 0.7 mm. In this paper, we choose w22 = 0.6 mm for the proposed CP antenna design.Figure 6
Effects of variousw22 on S11.Figure 7
Effects of variousw22 on AR.Figure8 shows the simulated results of ANT.4 with the length of w23 from 0.45 to 0.9 mm. It can be seen from Figure 8 that the IMBW is increased as w23 increases from 0 to 0.75 mm. However, the IMBW is reduced with the increase of w23 from 0.75 to 0.9 mm. Meanwhile, it can be seen from Figure 9 that the 3-dB ARBW is also increased as w23 increases from 0.45 to 0.75 mm. However, the IMBW is reduced with the increase of w23 from 0.75 to 0.9 mm. With the analysis above, we choose w23 = 0.75 mm for the proposed CP antenna design.Figure 8
Effects of variousw23 on S11.Figure 9
Effects of variousw23 on AR.Through analysis, the effects of feeding position on impedance matching and feeding position (w25) can be decided. When the feeding position is studied, the other parameters are fixed as listed in Table 1. It is discovered from Figures 10 and 11 that it can achieve better impedance matching when w25 is 0.8 mm.Figure 10
Effects of variousw25 on S11.Figure 11
Effects of variousw25 on AR.


## 3. Design Results

The final optimized antenna parameters are shown in Table1. Based on the optimized parameters, the antenna is fabricated, and S11 is measured to validate the design and simulated results. This antenna is tested by a vector network analyzer (AgilentN5227A). Photographs of the fabricated CP antenna showing the patch and ground views are shown in Figures 12 and 13, respectively.Figure 12
Photographs of the fabricated CP antenna showing the patch view.Figure 13
Photographs of the fabricated CP antenna showing the ground view.Simulated and measuredS11 are shown in Figure 14. The simulated impedance bandwidth for S11<−10dB is 35.43% (24.11 to 34.49 GHz). The measured IMBW for S11<−10dB is 35.97% (22.8 to 33.8 GHz), which agree with the simulated result.Figure 14
Simulated and measuredS11.As shown in Figure15, the simulated 3-dB ARBW is enhanced to 15.19% (28.77 GHz to 33.5 GHz). In Figure 16, a peak gain between 5.08 dBic and 5.22 dBic is achieved at the boresight direction within 3-dB ARBW.Figure 15
Simulated AR of the proposed antenna.Figure 16
Simulated peak gain of the proposed antenna.As shown in Figure17, the simulated time-varying surface current distributions of ANT4 at 32.4 GHz are illustrated to verify the generation of CP radiation. Two orthogonal resonant modes with a 90° phase difference and equal amplitude can achieve CP radiation. It can be observed that the proposed antenna is LHCP towards the +z-direction.Figure 17
Simulated surface current distributions at 32.4 GHz.The normalized radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at 32.4 GHz inxz plane and yz plane are shown in Figure 18.Figure 18
Simulated normalized radiation patterns at 32.4 GHz.
(a)
(b)A comparison between the proposed antenna and previous works [16–20] at mmWave frequency band is illustrated in Table 2, including the antenna type, size, impedance bandwidth (IMBW), and 3-dB ARBW. It shows the proposed antenna has a simper structure, more compact size, wider impedance bandwidth, and wider 3-dB ARBW. Additionally, because the profiles in [16, 17] are about three times those of the proposed antenna, the 3-dB ARBW of the proposed antenna is slightly smaller than that in [16, 17].Table 2
Comparison of CP Antennas at mmWave.
ANT type
Size (λ03)
IMBW (%)
3-dB ARBW (%)
Aperture [16]
1.58× 1.58 × 0.16
18
16.3
Aperture [17]
2× 1.82 × 0.16
>17.9
16.3
Aperture and patch [18]
1.14× 1.32 × 0.105
12
10
Waveguide [19]
3.57× 2.07 × 0.90
1.3
1.1
Patch [20]
1.12× 0.86  × (>0.12)
10.9
>11.57
Proposed ANT
0.27× 0.31 × 0.047
35.97
15.19


## 4. Conclusion

A novel design of Ka-band broadband CP antenna with compact structure has been presented, which is excited by a microstrip line radiator. The CP is achieved by loading a rectangular slot on the ground plane. Meanwhile, the antenna with broad IMBW and ARBW is satisfactorily realized by loading two symmetric parasitic rectangular patches paralleled to the central patch and a slit positioned to the right of the central patch. The results show that the measured impedance bandwidth of the proposed antenna forS11<−10dB is 35.97% (22.8 to 33.8 GHz). Meanwhile, the simulated 3-dB ARBW is enhanced to 15.19% (28.77 GHz to 33.5 GHz). Meanwhile, there are about 34 dB difference between the simulated LHCP and RHCP components at 32.4 GHz. It is useful for 5G wireless applications in Ka-band.



---

*Source: 2071895-2019-10-13.xml*