# Acute and Subacute Toxicity Study of Essential Oil of Cymbopogon Martini in Mice

Authors: Kassahun Dires Ayenew; Yihenew Sewale; Yosef Eshetie Amare; Amare Ayalew
Journal: Journal of Toxicology
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Background. Local Ethiopians regularly use Cymbopogon martini for cosmetic purposes. The plant’s safety, however, is not supported by any solid facts. This investigation aimed to evaluate the acute and subacute toxicities of C. martini essential oil in mice. Methods. The essential oil was analyzed using GC-MS. The approach outlined by Chinedu et al., 2013 has been used to calculate the median lethal dose. According to organization for economic cooperation and development (OECD) 407 standard, a 28-day repeated dose oral toxicity study was carried out on female mice. Three groups of ten experimental mice each were distributed at random. Group I received the same saline volume and was considered the control. Groups II and III were treated with doses of C. martini of 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg, respectively, of body weight. Hematological and biochemical markers were assessed. The liver and kidney were taken out after the sacrifice using sodium pentobarbital for pathological analysis. Results. Geraniol (40.89%) was the predominant component in the essential oil composition of C. martini with cyclofenchene (13.91%), myrcene (9.34%), 2, 4, 6, octatriene, 2, 6, dimethyl (8.20%), and ocimene (5.93%) being present in small amounts. The LD50 of C. martini essential oil was discovered to be greater than 5000 mg/kg body weight. During a 4-week follow-up period, mice treated with C. martini, the essential oil, at doses of 500 mg/kg or 1000 mg/kg body weight showed no evidence of toxicity or mortality. Biochemical and hematological parameters were not significantly altered in mice treated with the essential oil of C. martini compared with the control group. Histopathological evaluation of the liver and kidney did not exhibit any adverse results. Conclusions. The essential oil of C. martini from Ethiopia is considered relatively safe and nontoxic.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Herbal remedies have been used extensively to cure illnesses and as a source of contemporary medications [1]. Around 80% of the world’s population heavily relies on herbal medicine, and its use is expanding globally [2, 3]. Due to the various limitations of contemporary medications, attention is being paid to herbal remedies.About 70% of the active components used today or in clinical trials are derived from natural sources, making them a rich source of biodiversity for identifying pharmaceutical lead compounds and developing new drugs [4, 5]. Not only do pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters need to be known but also the drug’s safety [6].The primary reasons for discontinuing medications from clinical studies are hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity [7, 8]. Aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, sorbitol dehydrogenase, glutamate dehydrogenase, gamma-glutamyl-transferase, total bilirubin, total bile acids, and 5′-nucleotidase are some of the common biomarkers used to assess the safety of drugs for hepatotoxicity [9].A significant volume of blood in circulation (approximately 25% of cardiac output) may be related to the kidneys’ high susceptibility to active substances or their metabolites. More significantly, the concentration of toxins in the blood in the renal tubular fluid is linked to the role of nephrons in the processes of urine generation [7]. Blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine in experimental animals have been suggested as markers for nephrotoxicity assessment [10].90% of the population in Ethiopia relies on traditional medicine [11]. Local Ethiopians utilize Cymbopogon martini for cosmetic purposes.C. martini belongs to the family of Poaceae. It is commonly called palmarosa which has historically been used as a culinary ingredient and for fumigation. Essential oils from C. martini have been shown to have cytotoxic, antibacterial, and antioxidant effects [12].Despite being widely regarded as safe medications with a high therapeutic index, medicinal plants naturally contain metabolites that have the potential to harm humans, animals, and the environment [13].C. martini ethnopharmacology has been documented. However, studies on safety profiles are lacking. This study aimed to examine the safety of C. martini essential oil in mice.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Plant Material Collection and Identification

Fresh leaves ofC. martini were collected from the botanical garden of the Debre Berhan University-Ankober Herbal Medicine Research Center at Chefa Kebele in the North Shewa zone of the Amhara region, Ethiopia. The Botanist identified and authenticated the leaves in the Botanical Garden of Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia. For future use, voucher specimen No. CM 2012 was deposited in the herbarium of Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.


### 2.2. Method of Extraction

The leaves were steam distilled to produceC. martini essential oil. In order to ensure that the steam was delivered properly, the plant materials were placed into the still and stacked in layers. This approach was centered on putting the fragrant plant via steam. The plant’s volatile substances were collected by steam, which washed them away after passing through a serpentine that was chilled with cold water. A separator funnel was used to separate the distillate which contained a mixture of hydrosol vapor and essential oil. After drying over sodium sulfate, the essential oil was put into clean brown glass bottles to be kept until required [14].


### 2.3. Phytochemical Analysis

GC-MS determined the phytochemical analysis of the essential oil composition ofC. martini according to the method described previously [15, 16].


### 2.4. Experimental Animals

In this investigation, three-month-old mice were employed. They were obtained from the pharmacology department of Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Mice ranged in weight from 25 to 35 grams. They were given regular pellets to eat, and unlimited tap water was available. The procedure involved keeping mice in a sanitary cage at ambient temperature [17]. The institutional review board of Debre Berhan University in Debre Berhan, Ethiopia, granted ethical approval for the use of experimental mice. Mice were treated and handled in compliance with ethical standards adopted globally.


### 2.5. Determination of the Median Lethal Dose (LD50)

A limit dose of 5000 mg/kg body weight was used to determine the LD50 of the essential oil of C. martini. The LD50 was calculated according to the new approach outlined by Chinedu et al., 2013 [18]. Four female mice were employed in the study’s early phase. There were a total of four groups, each with one mouse. C. martini was administered in doses of 10 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg body weight (b.w) to Groups I and II, respectively. Groups III and IV were treated with 300 mg/kg and 600 mg/kg b.w., respectively. Mice were observed for an hour after the administration, then for ten minutes every two hours for the next 24 hours. In the second step, three female mice were used. They were randomly allocated into three groups. The doses given to Groups I and II were 1000 mg/kg and 1500 mg/kg b.w. Group III received treatment with 2000 mg/kg b.w. of C. martini essential oil. After treatment, animals were observed.In the last round of LD50 determination, three female mice were also used. The placement of the animals into three groups of one was random. The essential oil of C. martini was administered at doses of 3000 mg/kg, 4000 mg/kg, and 5000 mg/kg b.w. to Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Following administration, meticulous observation was carried out for one hour, then for ten minutes every two hours for the following twenty-four hours. Two mice were used in a confirmatory test at 5000 mg/kg b.w.


### 2.6. Sub Acute Toxicity Study

According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) 407 standard, the repeated dose 28-day oral toxicity study was carried out on female mice [19]. Since the responses are usually similar, the available literature suggests that any sex is used for subacute toxicity. When differences do exist, however, female mice are generally more sensitive [20, 21]. Three groups of ten experimental mice were randomly assigned into three groups of 10 animals each. The exact amount of saline was administered daily to Group I as the control group. The doses of 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w. of C. martini essential oil were given once daily to Groups II and III, respectively. These doses were established based on the findings of acute toxicity and the limit dose concept described by the European Chemical Agency in 2022 [22].The animals were observed daily for toxicity, death, abnormal behavior, and other signs throughout the trial. Clinical observations were gathered and recorded prior to the test chemical’s distribution and each day after. The number of mice in each cage, their weights, and how much food they ate each week were recorded. On the 28th day, the only thing mice were allowed to drink was water. The next morning, mice were weighed, and blood was taken from a common carotid artery for hematological and biochemical examinations. Sodium pentobarbital was used to finish the experiment by killing all mice from both experimental groups.Blood was extracted into a precalibrated tube containing EDTA for hematological assays. Hematological parameters including mean cell hemoglobin (MCH), mean cell volume (MCV), mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), hemoglobin (HB), hematocrit (HCT), and platelet count (PC) were analyzed using a hematological analyzer. For biochemical examination, the serum was separated, and samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. Aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphate (ALP), total cholesterol (TC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine (CREA) were measured using an automated chemical analyzer. All animals had their livers and kidneys removed for gross anatomical and histological examinations. Formalin buffered at 10% was used to preserve the organs. Hematoxylin and eosin were used to stain the tissues, which were subsequently sliced to a thickness of 5μm, placed on glass slides, and examined under a light microscope. Photomicro-graphs were taken at 4 and 40 times [23].


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

Results are presented in terms of the mean and standard errors of the mean (SEM). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferroni multiple comparison tests were used to assess the data. AtP<0.05, differences were deemed statistically significant.


## 2.1. Plant Material Collection and Identification

Fresh leaves ofC. martini were collected from the botanical garden of the Debre Berhan University-Ankober Herbal Medicine Research Center at Chefa Kebele in the North Shewa zone of the Amhara region, Ethiopia. The Botanist identified and authenticated the leaves in the Botanical Garden of Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia. For future use, voucher specimen No. CM 2012 was deposited in the herbarium of Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.


## 2.2. Method of Extraction

The leaves were steam distilled to produceC. martini essential oil. In order to ensure that the steam was delivered properly, the plant materials were placed into the still and stacked in layers. This approach was centered on putting the fragrant plant via steam. The plant’s volatile substances were collected by steam, which washed them away after passing through a serpentine that was chilled with cold water. A separator funnel was used to separate the distillate which contained a mixture of hydrosol vapor and essential oil. After drying over sodium sulfate, the essential oil was put into clean brown glass bottles to be kept until required [14].


## 2.3. Phytochemical Analysis

GC-MS determined the phytochemical analysis of the essential oil composition ofC. martini according to the method described previously [15, 16].


## 2.4. Experimental Animals

In this investigation, three-month-old mice were employed. They were obtained from the pharmacology department of Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Mice ranged in weight from 25 to 35 grams. They were given regular pellets to eat, and unlimited tap water was available. The procedure involved keeping mice in a sanitary cage at ambient temperature [17]. The institutional review board of Debre Berhan University in Debre Berhan, Ethiopia, granted ethical approval for the use of experimental mice. Mice were treated and handled in compliance with ethical standards adopted globally.


## 2.5. Determination of the Median Lethal Dose (LD50)

A limit dose of 5000 mg/kg body weight was used to determine the LD50 of the essential oil of C. martini. The LD50 was calculated according to the new approach outlined by Chinedu et al., 2013 [18]. Four female mice were employed in the study’s early phase. There were a total of four groups, each with one mouse. C. martini was administered in doses of 10 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg body weight (b.w) to Groups I and II, respectively. Groups III and IV were treated with 300 mg/kg and 600 mg/kg b.w., respectively. Mice were observed for an hour after the administration, then for ten minutes every two hours for the next 24 hours. In the second step, three female mice were used. They were randomly allocated into three groups. The doses given to Groups I and II were 1000 mg/kg and 1500 mg/kg b.w. Group III received treatment with 2000 mg/kg b.w. of C. martini essential oil. After treatment, animals were observed.In the last round of LD50 determination, three female mice were also used. The placement of the animals into three groups of one was random. The essential oil of C. martini was administered at doses of 3000 mg/kg, 4000 mg/kg, and 5000 mg/kg b.w. to Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Following administration, meticulous observation was carried out for one hour, then for ten minutes every two hours for the following twenty-four hours. Two mice were used in a confirmatory test at 5000 mg/kg b.w.


## 2.6. Sub Acute Toxicity Study

According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) 407 standard, the repeated dose 28-day oral toxicity study was carried out on female mice [19]. Since the responses are usually similar, the available literature suggests that any sex is used for subacute toxicity. When differences do exist, however, female mice are generally more sensitive [20, 21]. Three groups of ten experimental mice were randomly assigned into three groups of 10 animals each. The exact amount of saline was administered daily to Group I as the control group. The doses of 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w. of C. martini essential oil were given once daily to Groups II and III, respectively. These doses were established based on the findings of acute toxicity and the limit dose concept described by the European Chemical Agency in 2022 [22].The animals were observed daily for toxicity, death, abnormal behavior, and other signs throughout the trial. Clinical observations were gathered and recorded prior to the test chemical’s distribution and each day after. The number of mice in each cage, their weights, and how much food they ate each week were recorded. On the 28th day, the only thing mice were allowed to drink was water. The next morning, mice were weighed, and blood was taken from a common carotid artery for hematological and biochemical examinations. Sodium pentobarbital was used to finish the experiment by killing all mice from both experimental groups.Blood was extracted into a precalibrated tube containing EDTA for hematological assays. Hematological parameters including mean cell hemoglobin (MCH), mean cell volume (MCV), mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), hemoglobin (HB), hematocrit (HCT), and platelet count (PC) were analyzed using a hematological analyzer. For biochemical examination, the serum was separated, and samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. Aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphate (ALP), total cholesterol (TC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine (CREA) were measured using an automated chemical analyzer. All animals had their livers and kidneys removed for gross anatomical and histological examinations. Formalin buffered at 10% was used to preserve the organs. Hematoxylin and eosin were used to stain the tissues, which were subsequently sliced to a thickness of 5μm, placed on glass slides, and examined under a light microscope. Photomicro-graphs were taken at 4 and 40 times [23].


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

Results are presented in terms of the mean and standard errors of the mean (SEM). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferroni multiple comparison tests were used to assess the data. AtP<0.05, differences were deemed statistically significant.


## 3. Results

The mice used in the experiment were all healthy. In the acute toxicity investigation, 12 female mice in total were employed. In subacute toxicity investigations, 30 female mice were used, and every animal followed the prescribed treatment plan.


### 3.1. Phytochemical Analysis

Geranial (40.89%) was the predominant component in the essential oil composition ofC. martini with cyclofenchene (13.91%), myrcene (9.34%), 2, 4, 6, octatriene, 2, 6, dimethyl (8.20%), and ocimene (5.93%) being present in small amounts. Furthermore, there were trace amounts of hexadecanoic acid, bisabolone, 11-octadecenoic acid, methyl stearate, 4- undeccanone, citral, citronellol, and caryophyllene.


### 3.2. Effect on Acute Toxicity

Mice receiving oral doses of the essential oils ofC. martini up to 5000 mg/kg did not exhibit treatment-related mortality, and no symptoms of toxicity or morbidity were noticed. The LD50 of C. martini essential oils was found to be greater than 5000 mg/kg b.w.


### 3.3. Effect on Subacute Toxicity

During a 4-week follow-up period, female mice treated with 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w. of the essential oils ofC. martini showed no evidence of toxicity or death due to the treatment. As can be observed in Table 1, there were no appreciable variations in body weight between the mice treated with C. martini essential oils at doses of 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w. and the control group.Table 1
Changes in body weight of mice after treatment with 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w. ofC. martini essential oil.
TreatmentDose (mg/kg)Weight (gram)Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Control10 ml/kg29.6 ± 3.430.6 ± 3.631.3 ± 3.732.9 ± 2.1CM50027.2 ± 4.828.4 ± 7.629.1 ± 6.926.8 ± 3.2CM100028.5 ± 3.526.8 ± 3.225.8 ± 4.224.8 ± 3.2P value0.070.160.380.59When compared to mice that received normal saline, mice were treated with essential oils ofC. martini at doses of 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w. did not consume food in significantly different ways, as shown in Table 2.Table 2
Changes in food consumption of mice following treatment with essential oil ofC. martini at 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w.
TreatmentDose (mg/kg)Food consumption (gram)Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Control10 ml/kg26.2 ± 0.926.5 ± 1.325.0 + 1.226.4 ± 0.6CM50024.0 ± 1.724.2 ± 2.023.5 ± 1.424.0 ± 1.8100023.5 ± 2.623.0 ± 1.323.0 ± 2.322.0 ± 2.9P value—0.080.230.170.25No appreciable variations were seen between mice givenC. martini essential oil and the control group’s hematological parameters, which were all within the normal range (Table 3).Table 3
Effect ofC. martini essential oil on hematological parameters in mice.
TreatmentDose (mg/kg)RBC (106/mm3)WBC (103/mm3)PC (105/μl)HB (gm.)MCH (g/dl)MCV (g/dl)MCHC (g/dl)Control10 ml/kg9.79 ± 8.037.63 ± 2.5011.15 ± 0.7514.7 ± 0.534.54 ± 3.4649 ± 532.5 ± 4.5CM5009.15 ± 0.77.68 ± 2.8010.45 ± 2.4512.81 ± 0.9934.74 ± 3.2648.3 ± 5.734.8 ± 1.2CM10009.34 ± 0.457.79 ± 3.239.55 ± 3.4513.3 ± 1.434.94 ± 3.0648.8 ± 6.235.3 ± 2.7P value0.670.270.620.270.480.430.86As shown in Table4, compared to the control group, subacute administration of C. martini essential oil in mice at doses of 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w. exhibited no significant changes in all biochemical markers assessed.Table 4
Effect of essential oil ofC. martini on biochemical parameters in mice.
TreatmentDose (mg/kg)AST (U/L)ALT (U/L)ALP (U/L)Total chol. (gm)BUN (mmol/L)Creatinine (mg/dl)Control10 ml/kg74.7 ± 7.345.5 ± 12.567.2 ± 18.852.4 ± 17.622.8 ± 4.20.125 ± 0.015CM50072.8 ± 23.249.7 ± 10.768 ± 1454.2 ± 9.8025.4 ± 3.260.128 ± 0.01CM100071.16 ± 7.443.7 ± 13.262.5 ± 7.4550.4 ± 20.623.6 ± 3.060.116 ± 0.05P value0.270.270.850.560.500.10


### 3.4. Effect on the Histology of the Liver and Kidney

The liver and kidneys of the control mice were healthy, as seen in Figure1. Both the cellular topologies and the integrity of the cells were unaffected when comparing the two tissues in the experimental groups to their respective controls. Figures 2 and 3 show that neither the kidneys nor the liver of the experimental animals showed any histological abnormalities.Figure 1
Histology of the liver and kidneys of control mice. The liver and kidney showed no histological changes. (a) Liver (mag x4). (b) Kidney (mag x4).Figure 2
Histology of the liver and the kidney of mice treated at a dose of 500 mg/kg indicating normal liver and kidney cells. (a) Liver (mag x40). (b) Kidney (mag x40).Figure 3
Histology of the liver and kidney of mice administered withC. martini essential oil at 1000 mg/kg demonstrating the lack of abnormalities in the liver and kidney cells. (a) Liver (mag x4). (b) Kidney (mag x4).


## 3.1. Phytochemical Analysis

Geranial (40.89%) was the predominant component in the essential oil composition ofC. martini with cyclofenchene (13.91%), myrcene (9.34%), 2, 4, 6, octatriene, 2, 6, dimethyl (8.20%), and ocimene (5.93%) being present in small amounts. Furthermore, there were trace amounts of hexadecanoic acid, bisabolone, 11-octadecenoic acid, methyl stearate, 4- undeccanone, citral, citronellol, and caryophyllene.


## 3.2. Effect on Acute Toxicity

Mice receiving oral doses of the essential oils ofC. martini up to 5000 mg/kg did not exhibit treatment-related mortality, and no symptoms of toxicity or morbidity were noticed. The LD50 of C. martini essential oils was found to be greater than 5000 mg/kg b.w.


## 3.3. Effect on Subacute Toxicity

During a 4-week follow-up period, female mice treated with 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w. of the essential oils ofC. martini showed no evidence of toxicity or death due to the treatment. As can be observed in Table 1, there were no appreciable variations in body weight between the mice treated with C. martini essential oils at doses of 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w. and the control group.Table 1
Changes in body weight of mice after treatment with 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w. ofC. martini essential oil.
TreatmentDose (mg/kg)Weight (gram)Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Control10 ml/kg29.6 ± 3.430.6 ± 3.631.3 ± 3.732.9 ± 2.1CM50027.2 ± 4.828.4 ± 7.629.1 ± 6.926.8 ± 3.2CM100028.5 ± 3.526.8 ± 3.225.8 ± 4.224.8 ± 3.2P value0.070.160.380.59When compared to mice that received normal saline, mice were treated with essential oils ofC. martini at doses of 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w. did not consume food in significantly different ways, as shown in Table 2.Table 2
Changes in food consumption of mice following treatment with essential oil ofC. martini at 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w.
TreatmentDose (mg/kg)Food consumption (gram)Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Control10 ml/kg26.2 ± 0.926.5 ± 1.325.0 + 1.226.4 ± 0.6CM50024.0 ± 1.724.2 ± 2.023.5 ± 1.424.0 ± 1.8100023.5 ± 2.623.0 ± 1.323.0 ± 2.322.0 ± 2.9P value—0.080.230.170.25No appreciable variations were seen between mice givenC. martini essential oil and the control group’s hematological parameters, which were all within the normal range (Table 3).Table 3
Effect ofC. martini essential oil on hematological parameters in mice.
TreatmentDose (mg/kg)RBC (106/mm3)WBC (103/mm3)PC (105/μl)HB (gm.)MCH (g/dl)MCV (g/dl)MCHC (g/dl)Control10 ml/kg9.79 ± 8.037.63 ± 2.5011.15 ± 0.7514.7 ± 0.534.54 ± 3.4649 ± 532.5 ± 4.5CM5009.15 ± 0.77.68 ± 2.8010.45 ± 2.4512.81 ± 0.9934.74 ± 3.2648.3 ± 5.734.8 ± 1.2CM10009.34 ± 0.457.79 ± 3.239.55 ± 3.4513.3 ± 1.434.94 ± 3.0648.8 ± 6.235.3 ± 2.7P value0.670.270.620.270.480.430.86As shown in Table4, compared to the control group, subacute administration of C. martini essential oil in mice at doses of 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w. exhibited no significant changes in all biochemical markers assessed.Table 4
Effect of essential oil ofC. martini on biochemical parameters in mice.
TreatmentDose (mg/kg)AST (U/L)ALT (U/L)ALP (U/L)Total chol. (gm)BUN (mmol/L)Creatinine (mg/dl)Control10 ml/kg74.7 ± 7.345.5 ± 12.567.2 ± 18.852.4 ± 17.622.8 ± 4.20.125 ± 0.015CM50072.8 ± 23.249.7 ± 10.768 ± 1454.2 ± 9.8025.4 ± 3.260.128 ± 0.01CM100071.16 ± 7.443.7 ± 13.262.5 ± 7.4550.4 ± 20.623.6 ± 3.060.116 ± 0.05P value0.270.270.850.560.500.10


## 3.4. Effect on the Histology of the Liver and Kidney

The liver and kidneys of the control mice were healthy, as seen in Figure1. Both the cellular topologies and the integrity of the cells were unaffected when comparing the two tissues in the experimental groups to their respective controls. Figures 2 and 3 show that neither the kidneys nor the liver of the experimental animals showed any histological abnormalities.Figure 1
Histology of the liver and kidneys of control mice. The liver and kidney showed no histological changes. (a) Liver (mag x4). (b) Kidney (mag x4).Figure 2
Histology of the liver and the kidney of mice treated at a dose of 500 mg/kg indicating normal liver and kidney cells. (a) Liver (mag x40). (b) Kidney (mag x40).Figure 3
Histology of the liver and kidney of mice administered withC. martini essential oil at 1000 mg/kg demonstrating the lack of abnormalities in the liver and kidney cells. (a) Liver (mag x4). (b) Kidney (mag x4).


## 4. Discussion

Cosmetics sectors all utilize essential oils often. The toxicity of these products is becoming a topic of growing study [24]. The primary reasons for discontinuing effective medications from clinical studies are hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity [7, 8].In the current study, geraniol (40.89%) was the predominant component in the essential oil composition ofC. martini with cyclofenchene (13.91%), myrcene (9.34%), 2, 4, 6, octatriene, 2, 6, dimethyl (8.20%), and ocimene (5.93%) being present in small amounts. Furthermore, there were trace amounts of hexadecanoic acid, bisabolone, 11-octadecenoic acid, methyl stearate, 4- undeccanone, citral, citronellol, and caryophyllene. A previous study on phytochemical analysis of C. martini reported that geraniol was the primary compound (57.49%) followed by geranyl acetate (13.56%), linalool (1.71%), β-caryophyllene (1.07%) and ocimene (0.27%) [25].Up to a dose of 5000 mg/kg b.w., mice receiving oral administration ofC. martini essential oils did not exhibit treatment-related mortality, and no symptoms of toxicity or morbidity were noticed. The results of the investigation on acute toxicity revealed that the LD50 of C. martini essential oil was more than 5000 mg/kg b.w. Based on this finding, the general harmonized system (GHS) of the United Nations has classified the essential oil of C. martini as belonging to the class of chemicals with a low acute oral toxicity, or the 5th class of toxicity [26].In line with the findings of Andrade et al., subacute treatment of essentialC. martini at 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg b.w had no discernible impact on the body weight and food intake of mice [25].According to this study’s evaluation, RBC, WBC, PC, HB, MCH, MCV, and MCHC did not substantially alter in mice following treatment withC. martini essential oil. This discovery has not yet been reported so far.The release of cytosolic enzymes into the circulation happens in conjunction with plasma membrane damage from hepatic cells under various pathological circumstances. After exposure to harmful agents, the aminotransferases ALT and AST are utilized to diagnose liver damage [27]. Following therapy with C. martini essential oil, these parameters in mice did not alter appreciably. In this instance, Andrade et al. reported a similar outcome [25].


## 5. Conclusions

The essential oil ofC. martini was shown to be neither acutely poisonous nor sub acutely harmful in mice. Using this oil for cosmetic reasons is safe, according to the information from the present study. Finally, it can be claimed that the essential oil of Ethiopian C. martini is nontoxic. Future research should be done to corroborate the current findings, and studies on long-term toxicity should be utilized to determine how safe it is for humans.



---

*Source: 1995578-2022-12-17.xml*