# Histamine and Immune Biomarkers in CNS Disorders

Authors: Ramón Cacabelos; Clara Torrellas; Lucía Fernández-Novoa; Francisco López-Muñoz
Journal: Mediators of Inflammation
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Neuroimmune dysregulation is a common phenomenon in different forms of central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Cross-links between central and peripheral immune mechanisms appear to be disrupted as reflected by a series of immune markers (CD3, CD4, CD7, HLA-DR, CD25, CD28, and CD56) which show variability in brain disorders such as anxiety, depression, psychosis, stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, migraine, epilepsy, vascular dementia, mental retardation, cerebrovascular encephalopathy, multiple sclerosis, brain tumors, cranial nerve neuropathies, mental retardation, and posttraumatic brain injury. Histamine (HA) is a pleiotropic monoamine involved in several neurophysiological functions, neuroimmune regulation, and CNS pathogenesis. Changes in brain HA show an age- and sex-related pattern, and alterations in brain HA levels are present in different CNS regions of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Brain HA in neuronal and nonneuronal compartments plays a dual role (neurotrophic versus neurotoxic) in a tissue-specific manner. Pathogenic mechanisms associated with neuroimmune dysregulation in AD involve HA, interleukin-1β, and TNF-α, whose aberrant expression contributes to neuroinflammation as an aggravating factor for neurodegeneration and premature neuronal death.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In 1955, Pepys postulated that histamine (HA) could affect the immune response. Since then, the influence of HA on immune and inflammatory reactions has been well documented. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, Watanabe’s, Schwartz’s, and Panula’s groups in Japan, France, and Finland, respectively, demonstrated the presence of HA in the brain where this ancestral biogenic amine acts as a neurotransmitter and neuroimmune modulator [1–3]. HA is at a privileged position to display multiple pleiotropic functions in peripheral tissues and in the central nervous system (CNS). HA is synthesized by histidine decarboxylase (HDC; EC 4.1.1.22) from L-histidine in different cellular compartments (mast cells, basophils, glial cells, endothelial cells, and neurons). HA acts through different types of HA receptors (H1R, H2R, H3R, and H4R). H1R and H2R are widely distributed in most cells and tissues; however, H3Rs are mainly expressed in the CNS, and H4Rs are expressed in hematopoietic cells, indicating their function in neurotransmission and immunomodulation, respectively. The H3R is a recognized drug target for neuronal diseases, such as cognitive impairment, schizophrenia (SCZ), sleep/wake disorders, epilepsy, and neuropathic pain [4]. The organization of the brain histaminergic system shows a strategic disposition, with HA neurons located in the posterior hypothalamus, from where ascending pathways (to the anterior hypothalamus, limbic structures (hippocampus), neocortex, and subcortical structures) and descending pathways (to the brain stem and spinal cord) are organized. The interplay of brain HA in neurons, endothelial cells, glia, and mast cells is fundamental for the regulation of diverse physiological functions (neuroendocrine system, circadian rhythms, sleep-wakefulness cycle, psychomotor activity, mood, learning, cognition, appetite, and eating behavior); and alterations in multicompartment brain HA are involved in several pathological conditions, such as epilepsy, stroke, anxiety, depression, psychosis, neurodegeneration, and neuroinflammatory processes [3, 5, 6].


## 2. Compartmentalization and Physiological Functions

Brain HA is distributed in several compartments (neuronal, glial, endothelial, and mast cells). Mast cells are connective tissue cells, discovered by Ehrlich in 1887, which are rich in metachromatic granules containing HA, heparin, and serotonin. Riley, West, and coworkers were the first to establish an association between mast cells and HA in 1953, and Benditt and colleagues showed, in 1955, that mast cells also contained 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; serotonin). In 1953, Riley demonstrated that injection of HA releasers was followed by damage to mast cells. Examples of HA releasers include compound 48/80, mast cell-degranulating peptide (MCD), polylysine, polymyxin B, dextran, phosphatidylserine, melittin, F-Met-tripeptides, C5a/C3a anaphylatoxins, C4a, calcium ionophore A23187, and many cytokines and growth factors. Many, if not all, mast cells are innervated by varicose axons in different body structures, and even an “axon reflex” pathway involving mast cells was proposed in the skin by Kiernan in 1965 [7]. Mast cells originate from bone marrow hematopoietic CD34+ progenitor cells, which enter the circulation and migrate to distal tissues where they ultimately reside. Mature mast cells are a heterogeneous population of cells with various phenotypes depending on their location. Mast cells express FcεRI, a high-affinity IgE receptor, which upon activation induces exocytosis of cytoplasmic secretory granules,de novo synthesis of lipid-derived mediators, and release of cytokines, chemokines, monoamines, and growth factors. Mast cell secretory granules contain a great variety of mediators, such as histamine, serotonin, tryptase, chymase, and antizyme inhibitor 2 (AZIN2), an activator of polyamine biosynthesis whose catalyzing enzyme is ornithine decarboxylase [8]. Mast cells are resident in the brain and contain numerous mediators, including neurotransmitters, cytokines, and chemokines, that are released in response to a variety of natural and pharmacological triggers. Brain mast cells are of two types, namely, metachromatic type I cells and normochromatic type II cells, or neurolipomastocytoid cells. In mice devoid of mast cells (W/W
v mice), the administration of α-fluoromethylhistidine (FMH), a suicide inhibitor of HDC, reduces the concentration of brain HA to nearly zero, suggesting that approximately 50% of the content of HA in the CNS belongs to the nonneuronal pool [9, 10]. The presence of mast cells in meninges and perivascular locations on the brain side of the BBB, especially in thalamic and hippocampal regions, may indicate that this cell type is relevant in neurovascular responses. The number of mast cells in the brain fluctuates with stress and various behavioral and endocrine states. Some mast cell mediators are synthesized upon activation (e.g., neuropeptides, cytokines) while others are preformed and stored in granules from which they are rapidly released (e.g., serotonin, histamine). Mast cells can act via autocrine and paracrine mechanisms; their secretions can reach a large space volume, and they can migrate to critical regions influencing neuronal activity, repairing tissue damage, or aggravating inflammatory processes within the CNS. These properties suggest that mast cells are poised to influence neural systems underlying behavior. Using genetic and pharmacological loss-of-function models, Nautiyal et al. [11] performed a behavioral screen for arousal responses including emotionality, locomotor, and sensory components and found that mast cell-deficient Kit
W-sh
/
W-sh (sash−/−) mice had a greater anxiety-like phenotype than WT and heterozygote littermate control animals in the open field arena and elevated plus maze. Blockade of brain, but not peripheral, mast cell activation increased anxiety-like behavior. Brain mast cells might be implicated in the modulation of anxiety-like behavior and provide evidence for the behavioral importance of neuroimmune links [11].Microglia can constitutively express HA receptors (H1R, H2R, H3R, and H4R), and the expression of H1R and H4R can be selectively upregulated by HA in microglial cells in a dose-dependent manner. HA can also stimulate microglia activation and production of proinflammatory cytokines. HA induces TNF-α and IL-6 release from activated microglia via H1R and H4R-MAPK and the PI3K/AKT-NF-kappa B signaling pathway [12]. Microglia express H2R, H3R, histidine decarboxylase, and histamine N-methyltransferase. Both forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation and ATP-induced intracellular Ca2+ transients are reduced by the H3R agonist imetit but not by the H2R agonist amthamine. H3Rs can regulate various microglial functions. HA and imetit inhibit microglial chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced cytokine production [13]. HA and substance P can trigger microglial activation and release of proinflammatory factors from microglia, thus contributing to the development of microglia-mediated inflammation in the brain [14].The interplay of brain HA in neurons, endothelial cells, glia, and mast cells is fundamental for the regulation of diverse physiological functions (neuroendocrine system, circadian rhythms, sleep-wakefulness cycle, psychomotor activity, mood, learning, cognition, appetite, and eating behavior); and alterations in multicompartment brain HA are involved in several pathological conditions [3, 5, 15, 16].HA is implicated in the control of arousal state, exerting a potent phase-shifting effect on the circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). To reset the circadian clock, HA increasesC
a
2
+
i in SCN neurons by activating CaV 1.3 channels through H1Rs and secondarily by causing Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release from RyR-mediated internal stores [17]. Light has direct effects on sleep and wakefulness causing arousal in diurnal animals and sleep in nocturnal animals. Histaminergic neurotransmission attenuates the light-induced sleep response during the dark period [18]. Using knockout (KO) mice lacking HDC, Parmentier et al. [19] demonstrated the importance of histaminergic neurons in maintaining wakefulness under behavioral challenges. H1-receptor KO (H1−/−) mice share several characteristics with HDC KO mice, including a decrease in wakefulness after lights-off despite its normal baseline daily amount, a decreased EEG slow wave sleep (SWS)/W power ratio, and inability to maintain wakefulness in response to behavioral challenges. Most of these effects are mediated by central H1Rs [19]. Yu et al. [20] reported that GABA and HA are involved in the mechanisms of wakefulness. HA neurons in the tuberomammillary nucleus (TMN) of the hypothalamus form a widely projecting, wake-active network that sustains arousal. HA neurons contain GABA. Selective siRNA knockdown of the vesicular GABA transporter (vgat, SLC32A1) in HA neurons produces hyperactive mice with an exceptional amount of sustained wakefulness. Ablation of the vgat gene throughout the TMN further sharpens this phenotype. Optogenetic stimulation in the caudate-putamen and neocortex of HA axonal projections from the TMN evokes tonic, extrasynaptic GABAA receptor Cl− currents onto medium spiny neurons and pyramidal neurons. These currents are abolished following vgat gene removal from the TMN area. Thus, wake-active HA neurons may generate a paracrine GABAergic signal that serves to provide a brake on overactivation of HA and to increase the precision of neocortical processing. Yu et al. [21] studied the contribution of one putative local clock in mouse histaminergic neurons in the tuberomammillary nucleus to the regulation of the sleep-wake cycle. Histaminergic neurons are silent during sleep and start firing after wake onset. HA enhances wakefulness. HDC gene expression varies with time of day. Deletion of the Bmal1 (Arntl/Mop3) clock gene from HA cells removes this variation, producing higher HDC expression and brain HA levels during the day. The consequences include more fragmented sleep, prolonged wakefulness at night, shallower sleep depth (lower nonrapid eye movement [NREM] δ power), increased NREM-to-REM transitions, hindered recovery sleep after sleep deprivation, and impaired memory. Removing BMAL1 from histaminergic neurons does not, however, affect circadian rhythms.There are important age- and sex-related changes in the concentration of HA and H1R in different regions of the CNS [6, 22] (Figure 1). Dramatic changes in HA and H1R have been reported after surgical manipulation of the neuroendocrine system (e.g., castration, adrenalectomy), clearly indicating the relevant effect that changes in the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenergic axis exert on brain HA [9, 22]. Similarly, direct interactions between the somatotropinergic system (GRH/SS-GH-IGF1) and HA [23] and the vasopressinergic system and HA have been extensively demonstrated [24].Figure 1
Age- and sex-related changes in brain histamine H1 receptors. AH: Anterior Hypothalamus; PH: Posterior Hypothalamus; ME: Median Eminence; Ah: Adenohypophysis; Nh: Neurohypophysis; Hip: Hippocampus; FCx: Frontal Cortex; ST: Striatum; BS: Brain Stem. Young rats < 3 months. Old rats > 12 months of age.HA is a powerful regulator of neuroimmune function [7]. L-Histidine and HA induce a time- and dose-dependent decrease in hypothalamic interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and this effect is not affected by mepyramine (H1R antagonist), famotidine (H2R antagonist), or thioperamide (H3R antagonist) [25]. The abolishment of neuronal HA by α-fluoromethylhistidine, a suicide inhibitor of HDC, causes a significant decrease in the hypothalamic concentration of TNF-α [26].


## 3. Brain Disorders and Neurodegeneration

Important changes in the peripheral (Figure2) and central levels of HA (Figure 3) occur in patients with different CNS disorders [6]. These changes are particularly important in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), where HA levels are significantly increased in most CNS regions [6, 27] (Figure 3). HA, TNF-α, and IL-1β regulate each other in the hypothalamus. Changes in HA, TNF-α [28], and IL-1β [28, 29] in AD correlate with cerebrovascular dysfunction and cognitive decline [3, 30]. Furthermore, improvement in cognitive function with neuroprotectants (e.g., CDL-choline) [31–33] or vegetal neurotrophins (e.g., anapsos) [34, 35] can reverse alterations in HA, TNF-α, and IL-1β levels in AD and in animal models of dementia [7, 25, 34–37].Figure 2
Blood histamine levels in CNS disorders. C: control; Anx: anxiety; Dep: depression; Psy: psychosis; Str: stroke; AD: Alzheimer’s disease; PD: Parkinson’s disease; ADHD: attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; Mig: migraine; Epi: epilepsy; VD: vascular dementia; VE: vascular encephalopathy; MS: multiple sclerosis; CVI: cerebrovascular insufficiency; BT: brain tumors; CNN: cranial nerve neuropathy; MR: mental retardation; PBI: posttraumatic brain injury; GP: general population.Figure 3
Changes in histamine levels in different brain regions from patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Notice the presence of a high concentration of HA in most brain regions of AD patients as compared with that of control (C) brains.AD-related neurodegeneration exhibits a pathological phenotype compatible with a reactive neuroinflammatory process in which HA, TNF-α, and IL-1β, among many other immune effectors, are involved. There is also a correlation between microglia activation andAPOE genotypes [38, 39]; and peripheral HA levels are alsoAPOE-related, with the lowest levels present in patients harboring theAPOE-4 allele [6, 40] (Figures 4 and 5). An association betweenAPOE-4 and increased expression of CD95 on T cells has also been reported, suggesting that hyperexpression of Fas mRNA and surface Fas receptor on CD45RO+ T lymphocytes may explain the occurrence of inflammatory cellular infiltrates in AD brain tissue [41].Figure 4
APOE-related blood histamine levels in Alzheimer’s disease. Concentration of blood histamine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) according to their apolipoprotein-E (APOE) genotype.APOE distribution and frequencies:APOE-2/3: 4%;APOE-2/4: 2%;APOE-3/3: 49%;APOE-3/4: 35%;APOE-4/4: 9%.Figure 5
Bigenic genotype (APOE +PSEN1)-related histamine levels in Alzheimer’s disease. Concentration of blood histamine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) according to their bigenic genotypes integratingAPOE + Presenilin-1 (PSEN1) in a single haplotype. Haplotype frequencies: 3311 (APOE-3/3 +PSEN1-1/1): 16%; 3312 (APOE-3/3 +PSEN1-1/2): 27%; 3322 (APOE-3/3 +PSEN1-2/2): 10%; 3411 (APOE-3/3 +PSEN1-1/1): 12%; 3412 (APOE-3/4 +PSEN1-1/2): 20%; 3422 (APOE-3/4 +PSEN1-2/2): 5.5%; 4411 (APOE-4/4 +PSEN1-1/1): 5.5%; 4412 (APOE-4/4 +PSEN1-1/2): 4%.All these data together illustrate the potential role of HA as a fundamental player in AD-related neuroinflammation and other neuropsychiatric disorders [16]. In fact, results of clinical trials with H3 antagonists such as ABT-288 [42] or GSK239512 have been recently reported [43].


## 4. Peripheral Immune Markers in CNS Disorders

Patients with different types of CNS disorders exhibit significant variation in lymphocyte subsets with regard to that of the general population, indicating that alterations in brain function may alter lymphocytes and immune markers in the periphery. By flow cytometry analysis, we have studied changes in lymphocyte subpopulations and immune markers in healthy controls (N
=
374) and in the general population (N
=
3311), as well as in patients with diverse CNS disorders including anxiety (N
=
340), depression (N
=
483), psychosis/schizophrenia (N
=
199), stroke (N
=
77), Alzheimer’s disease (N
=
247), Parkinson’s disease (N
=
81), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (N
=
47), migraine (N
=
238), epilepsy (N
=
81), vascular dementia (N
=
215), vascular encephalopathy (associated with diabetes, hypertension, or symptomatic arteriosclerosis) (N
=
404), multiple sclerosis (N
=
22), chronic cerebral insufficiency (N
=
152), brain tumors (N
=
14), cranial nerve neuropathy (trigeminal neuralgia, facial palsy) (N
=
32), mental retardation (N
=
135), and posttraumatic brain injury (N
=
65) [6] (Table 1). CD3 (total T cells) only showed significant differences (p
<
0.05) in children with mental retardation and in patients with vascular dementia. CD4 (T helper/inducer cells) significantly differ between controls and ADHD, mental retardation, and epilepsy; between depression and ADHD, mental retardation, and epilepsy; between migraine and ADHD and mental retardation; and between cerebrovascular insufficiency, ADHD, and mental retardation. CD7 (T cells + Natural Killer, NK) differ between vascular encephalopathy and psychosis, migraine, epilepsy, and mental retardation. CD8 (T suppressor/cytotoxic) did not show any relevant difference among different CNS pathologies with regard to controls. HLA-DR (Class II MCH antigen) exhibit significant differences between ADHD and Parkinson’s disease, stroke, vascular dementia, AD, and vascular encephalopathy; between epilepsy and Parkinson’s disease, stroke, vascular dementia, AD, and vascular encephalopathy; and between mental retardation and Parkinson’s disease, stroke, vascular dementia, AD, and vascular encephalopathy. CD25 (IL-2 receptors) were found lower in ADHD, mental retardation, and epilepsy with respect to controls and vascular encephalopathy. CD28 (60–80% CD3+) were found lower in vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease with regard to controls, anxiety, depression, psychosis, migraine, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, and posttraumatic brain injury. CD56 (NK cells) were significantly increased in Parkinson’s disease and vascular dementia in relation to most other groups. No significant changes were found in both CD3+/HLA-DR+ and CD4/CD8 ratios in CNS disorders [6] (Table 1). All these data together clearly reflect that brain damage and/or pathologic alterations in brain function leading to neurologic and/or psychiatric disorders can induce significant changes in peripheral lymphocytes and immune markers. This fact provides additional support to the predominant role of brain on immune function and immune mediators [6].Table 1
Immune markers in CNS disorders.
Population
N
Age (years)
CD3 (%)
CD4 (%)
CD7 (%)
CD8 (%)
HLA-DR (%)
CD25 (%)
CD28 (%)
CD56 (%)
CD3+/HLA-DR+
CD4/CD8
Control
374
49.87 ± 15.30(
1
–
3
)
71.11 ± 8.08(
95
-
96
)
51.45 ± 8.35(
97
–
99
)
65.57 ± 11.57
27.51 ± 7.44
12.31 ± 4.02
19.96 ± 9.26(
126
–
128
)
58.72 ± 9.88(
131
-
132
)
15.24 ± 6.42
6.21 ± 3.97
2.06 ± 0.85
Anxiety
340
42.69 ± 14.46(
4
–
6
)
69.73 ± 7.82
49.83 ± 7.77
63.41 ± 14.51
26.33 ± 7.13
12.58 ± 4.92
17.61 ± 10.06
58.20 ± 10.56(
133
-
134
)
15.15 ± 7.04
4.94 ± 3.80
2.06 ± 0.79
Depression
483
43.19 ± 14.11(
7
–
9
)
70.30 ± 7.98
50.92 ± 7.97(
100
–
102
)
63.80 ± 13.79
25.92 ± 7.26
12.32 ± 4.89
17.96 ± 9.94
58.97 ± 10.99(
135
-
136
)
14.56 ± 7.26
5.04 ± 4.44
2.16 ± 0.89
Psychosis
199
32.42 ± 13.19(
10
-
11
)
69.90 ± 7.47
48.32 ± 7.52
66.20 ± 12.50(107)
27.75 ± 7.88
12.93 ± 4.47
17.62 ± 9.08
59.44 ± 10.16(
137
-
138
)
14.40 ± 7.84
5.36 ± 4.72
1.92 ± 0.77
Stroke
77
61.51 ± 13.36(
12
–
20
)
70.57 ± 7.52
49.93 ± 8.11
61.57 ± 12.50
27.67 ± 7.69
10.25 ± 3.91
17.69 ± 8.98
54.32 ± 10.44
18.67 ± 8.31
6.30 ± 5.00
1.98 ± 0.73
Alzheimer’s disease
247
70.10 ± 11.11(
21
–
33
)
67.61 ± 10.34
49.60 ± 9.18
60.62 ± 14.36
26.24 ± 9.81
11.72 ± 6.20
17.65 ± 9.21
52.43 ± 10.89
18.92 ± 8.88
6.58 ± 4.85
2.25 ± 1.19
Parkinson’s disease
81
67.82 ± 10.03(
34
–
46
)
66.94 ± 10.63
47.54 ± 9.52
62.12 ± 13.65
28.22 ± 10.24
10.30 ± 3.88
15.64 ± 8.16
50.41 ± 9.97
22.44 ± 8.55(
149
–
162
)
5.95 ± 3.39
2.00 ± 1.06
Attention-Deficit Activity Disorder
47
9.27 ± 3.54
68.31 ± 6.45
44.29 ± 5.92
66.46 ± 10.32
25.90 ± 5.75
15.53 ± 5.10(
111
–
115
)
9.80 ± 5.74
56.82 ± 11.09
11.70 ± 5.22
4.12 ± 2.80
1.79 ± 0.46
Migraine
238
38.77 ± 13.90(
47
-
48
)
70.19 ± 8.56
50.17 ± 8.62(
103
-
104
)
66.15 ± 11.31(108)
27.25 ± 7.23
12.30 ± 4.19
17.11 ± 9.25
60.06 ± 10.50(
139
-
140
)
15.45 ± 8.15
5.43 ± 4.54
2.01 ± 0.84
Epilepsy
81
30.81 ± 19.06(
49
-
50
)
67.94 ± 7.18
46.36 ± 9.17
66.22 ± 12.77(109)
28.55 ± 7.08
14.17 ± 5.22(
116
–
120
)
15.07 ± 6.86
57.76 ± 9.97(
141
-
142
)
16.26 ± 7.59
5.25 ± 3.72
1.75 ± 0.65
Vascular dementia
215
75.29 ± 7.51(
51
–
65
)
66.48 ± 10.54
48.37 ± 9.60
61.05 ± 14.46
27.27 ± 8.45
11.85 ± 6.27
17.55 ± 9.53
51.05 ± 10.91
20.40 ± 8.15(
163
–
167
)
6.71 ± 5.44
2.00 ± 1.00
Vascular encephalopathy
404
68.78 ± 11.88(
66
–
78
)
68.35 ± 8.49
49.31 ± 9.11
59.86 ± 14.25
27.25 ± 8.88
12.07 ± 5.71
19.10 ± 10.23(
129
-
130
)
52.71 ± 11.22
18.08 ± 8.00
6.53 ± 4.73
2.10 ± 1.09
Multiple sclerosis
22
38.72 ± 11.64(
79
-
80
)
70.68 ± 7.81
49.42 ± 8.73
61.84 ± 17.94
26.57 ± 6.71
13.10 ± 5.73
17.94 ± 8.87
60.84 ± 9.02(
143
-
144
)
13.05 ± 7.07
5.47 ± 3.30
2.06 ± 1.06
Cerebrovascular insufficiency
152
53.64 ± 16.54(
81
–
83
)
68.88 ± 9.74
49.61 ± 9.22(
105
-
106
)
62.80 ± 12.29
27.80 ± 8.97
12.58 ± 6.21
18.35 ± 9.96
56.70 ± 12.12
16.57 ± 7.60
6.65 ± 6.12
2.03 ± 0.94
Brain tumors
14
54.21 ± 16.68(
84
–
86
)
68.66 ± 8.17
48.00 ± 8.66
65.16 ± 11.09
27.41 ± 9.50
11.75 ± 3.86
15.58 ± 6.31
53.08 ± 12.85
18.83 ± 7.19
5.25 ± 3.33
2.01 ± 1.01
Cranial nerve neuropathy
32
48.78 ± 18.61(
87
–
89
)
69.58 ± 7.10
48.82 ± 10.69
61.06 ± 13.07
24.79 ± 9.65
12.31 ± 5.25
15.41 ± 9.42
54.34 ± 15.30
15.31 ± 8.86
6.24 ± 5.13
2.21 ± 0.80
Mental retardation
135
14.63 ± 11.91
67.05 ± 7.95
45.95 ± 7.83
68.38 ± 10.38(110)
25.92 ± 5.70
15.69 ± 5.44(
121
–
125
)
12.02 ± 7.46
56.68 ± 11.75(
145
-
146
)
14.00 ± 6.50
5.72 ± 3.96
1.86 ± 0.62
Posttraumatic brain injury
65
39.43 ± 16.99(
90
-
91
)
70.86 ± 7.53
49.39 ± 9.32
64.48 ± 13.96
28.08 ± 7.42
12.10 ± 4.41
15.85 ± 10.02
59.25 ± 8.74(
147
-
148
)
15.87 ± 7.61
5.89 ± 4.14
1.93 ± 0.79
General population
3311
49.89 ± 21.44(
92
–
94
)
69.15 ± 8.84
49.32 ± 8.89
63.50 ± 13.36
27.15 ± 8.17
12.46 ± 5.33
17.66 ± 9.67
56.15 ± 11.23
16.53 ± 7.94
5.99 ± 4.85
2.04 ± 0.93
p
<
0.001
∗
p
<
0.001
p
<
0.001
p
<
0.001
p
=
0.039
p
<
0.001
p
<
0.001
p
<
0.001
p
<
0.001
p
<
0.001
p
=
0.002
Values: mean ± standard deviation.
Control (C), anxiety (Anx), depression (Dep), psychosis (Psy), stroke (Str), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), migraine (Mig), epilepsy (Epi), vascular dementia (VD), vascular encephalopathy (VE), multiple sclerosis (MS), cerebrovascular insufficiency (CVI), brain tumors (BT), cranial nerve neuropathy (CNN), mental retardation (MR), posttraumatic brain injury (PBI), and general population (GP).
∗Kruskal-Wallis One Way ANOVA on Ranks
Dunn’s Method (p
<
0.05): (1) C versus ADHD; (2) C versus MR; (3) C versus Psy; (4) Anx versus ADHD; (5) C versus MR; (6) Anx versus Psy; (7) Dep versus ADHD; (8) Dep versus MR; (9) Dep versus Psy; (10) Psy versus ADHD; (11) Psy versus MR; Str versus MR; (12) Str versus ADHD; (13) Str versus MR; (14) Str versus Psy; (15) Str versus Epi; (16) Str versus MS; (17) Str versus Mig; (18) Str versus PBI; (19) Str versus Anx; (20) Str versus Dep; (21) AD versus ADHD; (22) AD versus MR; (23) AD versus Psy; (24) AD versus Epi; (25) AD versus MS; (26) AD versus Mig; (27) AD versus PBI; (28) AD versus Anx; (29) AD versus Dep; (30) AD versus CNN; (31) AD versus C; (32) AD versus GP; (33) AD versus CVI; (34) PD versus ADHD; (35) PD versus MR; (36) PD versus Psy; (37) PD versus Epi; (38) PD versus MS; (39) PD versus Mig; (40) PD versus PBI; (41) PD versus Anx; (42) PD versus Dep; (43) PD versus CNN; (44) PD versus C; (45) PD versus GP; (46) PD versus CVI; (47) Mig versus ADHD; (48) Mig versus MR; (49) Epi versus ADHD; (50) Epi versus MR; (51) VD  versus ADHD; (52) VD versus MR; (53) VD versus Psy; (54) VD versus Epi; (55) VD versus MS; (56) VD versus Mig; (57) VD versus PBI; (58) VD versus Anx; (59) VD versus Dep; (60) VD versus CNN; (61) VD versus C; (62) VD versus GP; (63) VD versus CVI; (64) VD versus BT; (65) VD versus Str; (66) VE versus ADHD; (67) VE versus MR; (68) VE versus Psy; (69) VE versus Epi; (70) VE versus MS; (71) VE versus Mig; (72) VE versus PBI; (73) VE versus Anx; (74) VE versus Dep; (75) VE versus CNN; (76) VE versus C; (77) VE versus GP; (78) VE versus CVI; (79) MS versus ADHD; (80) MS versus MR; (81) CVI versus ADHD; (82) CVI versus MR; (83) CVI versus Psy; (84) BT versus ADHD; (85) BT versus MR; (86) BT versus Psy; (87) CNN versus ADHD; (88) CNN versus MR; (89) CNN versus Psy; (90) PBI versus ADHD; (91) PBI versus MR; (92) GP versus ADHD; (93) GP versus MR; (94) GP versus Psy; (95) C-CD3 versus MR-CD3; (96) C-CD3 versus VD-CD3; (97) C-CD4 versus ADHA-CD4; (98) C-CD4 versus MR-CD4; (99) C-CD4 versus Epi-CD4; (100) Dep-CD4 versus ADHA-CD4; (101) Dep-CD4 versus MR-CD4; (102) Dep-CD4 versus Epi-CD4; (103) Mig-CD4 versus ADHD-CD4; (104) Mig-CD4 versus MR-CD4; (105) CVI-CD4 versus ADHD-CD4; (106) CVI-CD4 versus MR-CD4; (107) Psy-CD7 versus VE-CD7; (108) Mig-CD7 versus VE-CD7; (109) Epi-CD7 versus VE-CD7; (110) MR-CD7 versus VE-CD7; (111) ADHD-HLA-DR versus PD-HLA-DR; (112) ADHD-HLA-DR versus Str-HLA-DR; (113) ADHD-HLA-DR versus VD-HLA-DR; (114) ADHD-HLA-DR versus AD-HLA-DR; (115) ADHD-HLA-DR versus VE-HLA-DR; (116) Epi-HLA-DR versus PD-HLA-DR; (117) Epi-HLA-DR versus Str-HLA-DR; (118) Epi-HLA-DR versus VD-HLA-DR; (119) Epi-HLA-DR versus AD-HLA-DR; (120) Epi-HLA-DR versus VE-HLA-DR; (121) MR-HLA-DR versus PD-HLA-DR; (122) MR-HLA-DR versus Str-HLA-DR; (123) MR-HLA-DR versus VD-HLA-DR; (124) MR-HLA-DR versus AD-HLA-DR; (125) MR-HLA-DR versus VE-HLA-DR; (126) C-CD25 versus ADHD-CD25; (127) C-CD25 versus MR-CD25; (128) C-CD25 versus Epi-CD25; (129) VE-CD25 versus ADHD-CD25; (130) VE-CD25 versus MR-CD25; (131) C-CD28 versus PD-CD28; (132) C-CD28 versus VD-CD28; (133) Anx-CD28 versus PD-CD28; (134) Anx-CD28 versus VD-CD28; (135) Dep-CD28 versus PD-CD28; (136) Dep-CD28 versus VD-CD28; (137) Psy-CD28 versus PD-CD28; (138) Psy-CD28 versus VD-CD28; (139) Mig-CD28 versus PD-CD28; (140) Mig-CD28 versus VD-CD28; (141) Epi-CD28 versus PD-CD28; (142) Epi-CD28 versus VD-CD28; (143) MS-CD28 versus PD-CD28; (144) MS-CD28 versus VD-CD28; (145) MR-CD28 versus PD-CD28; (146) MR-CD28 versus VD-CD28; (147) PBI-CD28 versus PD-CD28; (148) PBI-CD28 versus VD-CD28; (149) PD-CD56 versus ADHD-CD56; (150) PD-CD56 versus MS-CD56; (151) PD-CD56 versus MR-CD56; (152) PD-CD56 versus Psy-CD56; (153) PD-CD56 versus Dep-CD56; (154) PD-CD56 versus CNN-CD56; (155) PD-CD56 versus Mig-CD56; (156) PD-CD56 versus Anx-CD56; (157) PD-CD56 versus C-CD56; (158) PD-CD56 versus PBI-CD56; (159) PD-CD56 versus Epi-CD56; (160) PD-CD56 versus GP-CD56; (161) PD-CD56 versus CVI-CD56; (162) PD-CD56 versus VE-CD56; (163) VD-CD56 versus ADHD-CD56; (164) VD-CD56 versus MS-CD56; (165) VD-CD56 versus MR-CD56; (166) VD-CD56 versus Psy-CD56; (167) VD-CD56 versus Dep-CD56.


## 5. Inflammation Signaling and Regulation of Proinflammatory Genes

Recent studies bring new insights into the nature of inflammation signaling and regulation of proinflammatory genes, opening new avenues for novel therapeutic intervention in inflammatory processes. One example is the A20 protein, a cytosolic peptide that controls interactions between key ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, thereby regulating the expression of proinflammatory genes [44, 45]. TheA20 gene locus has been associated with risk for Crohn’s disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, type I diabetes, psoriasis, and atherosclerosis.A20 is an important regulator of autoimmunity and a tumor suppressor for Hodgkin’s lymphoma and large B cell lymphoma.A20 acts through the transcription factor nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) to control inflammation, and NF-κB regulates the expression of genes involved in inflammation and immunity. NF-κB protein inhibitor (IκB) maintains inactive NF-κB in the cytoplasma of unstimulated cells. Proinflammatory ligands, such as TNF-α, LPS, and IL-1β, activate the IκB kinase (IKK) complex to phosphorylate IκBs, inducing their degradation, which releases associated NF-κB to translocate into the nucleus and activate the transcription of genes that promote inflammation. One target gene isA20 (TNFAIP3), a negative feedback regulator that terminates IKK and NF-κB activation [44]. Shembade et al. [45] have reported that A20 negatively regulates inflammation by inhibiting NF-κB transcription factor in the TNF receptor (TNFR) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathways. A20 contains deubiquitinase and E3 ligase domains and has been proposed to function as a ubiquitin-editing enzyme downstream of TNFR1 by inactivating RIP1. A20 inhibits the E3 ligase activities of TRAF6, TRAF2, and clAP1 by antagonizing interactions with the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes Ubc13 and UbcH5c. A20, together with the regulatory molecule TAX1BP1, interacts with Ubc13 and UbcH5c and triggers their ubiquitination and proteasome-dependent degradation. These results suggest that pharmacological inhibition of the E2 ligases controlled by A20 might be beneficial in treating certain autoimmune diseases and cancer.Another example is the role of mitochondria in inflammation. Injury causes a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) that is clinically similar to sepsis. Microbial pathogen-associated molecular patterns activate innate immunocytes through pattern recognition receptors. Cellular injury can release endogenous damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that activate innate immunity. As postulated by Sagan, Altman, and others in the 1960s, mitochondria are evolutionary endosymbionts derived from bacteria which might bear bacterial molecular motifs. Zhang et al. [46] have shown that injury releases mitochondrial DAMPs (MTDs) into the circulation with functionally important immune consequences. MTDs include formyl peptides and mtDNA that activate polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) through formyl peptide receptor-1 and Toll-like receptor (TLR) 9, respectively. MTDs promote PMN calcium flux and phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, thus leading to PMN migration and degranulation. Circulating MTDs can elicit neutrophil-mediated organ injury. The release of such mitochondrial factors by cellular injury is a key link between trauma, inflammation, and SIRS [46].Metabolic reprogramming is implicated in macrophage activation. The NOTCH1 pathway dictates activation of M1 phenotypes in isolated mouse hepatic macrophages (HMacs) and in a murine macrophage cell line by coupling transcriptional upregulation ofM1 genes with metabolic upregulation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and ROS (mtROS) to augment induction ofM1 genes. Enhanced mitochondrial glucose oxidation is achieved by increased recruitment of the NOTCH1 intracellular domain (NICD1) to nuclear and mitochondrial genes that encode respiratory chain components and by NOTCH-dependent induction of pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase 1 (Pdp1) expression, pyruvate dehydrogenase activity, and glucose flux to the TCA cycle. Inhibition of the NOTCH pathway or Pdp1 knockdown abrogates glucose oxidation, mtROS, and M1 gene expression. Conditional NOTCH1 deficiency in the myeloid lineage attenuates HMac M1 activation and inflammation in a murine model of alcoholic steatohepatitis and markedly reduces lethality following endotoxin-mediated fulminant hepatitis in mice. Monocyte tracking requires NOTCH1 for the migration of blood monocytes into the liver and subsequent M1 differentiation. According to the elegant studies reported by Xu et al. [47], NOTCH1 promotes reprogramming of mitochondrial metabolism for M1 macrophage activation.Yin et al. [48] demonstrated for the first time that early hyperlipidemia promotes endothelial cells (EC) activation before monocyte recruitment via a caspase-1-sirtuin 1-activator protein-1 pathway, which provides an important insight into the development of novel therapeutics for blocking caspase-1 activation as early intervention of metabolic cardiovascular diseases and inflammations. Using new apolipoprotein E (ApoE)−/−/caspase-1−/− double knockout mice, they observed that (i) early hyperlipidemia induced caspase-1 activation inApoE
−/− mouse aorta; (ii) caspase-1−/−/ApoE
−/− mice attenuated early atherosclerosis; (iii) caspase-1−/−/ApoE
−/− mice had decreased aortic expression of proinflammatory cytokines and attenuated aortic monocyte recruitment; and (iv) caspase-1−/−/ApoE
−/− mice had decreased EC activation, including reduced adhesion molecule expression and cytokine secretion. Oxidized lipids activated caspase-1 and promoted pyroptosis in EC by a reactive oxygen species mechanism. Caspase-1 inhibition resulted in accumulation of sirtuin 1 in theApoE
−/− aorta, and sirtuin 1 inhibited caspase-1 upregulated genes via activator protein-1 pathway.Tristetraprolin (TTP) is an anti-inflammatory protein that acts by binding to AREs in its target mRNAs, such as TNF mRNA, and promoting their deadenylation and decay. TNF released from inflammatory cells can then stimulate gene expression in tissue cells, such as fibroblasts. The decay rates of transcripts encoded by several early-response genes, includingCxcl1,Cxcl2,Ier3,Ptgs2, andLif, are significantly slowed in TTP-deficient fibroblasts after TNF stimulation. These changes are associated with TTP-dependent increases in CXCL1, CXCL2, and IER3 protein levels. The TTP-susceptible transcripts contain multiple, conserved, closely spaced, potential TTP binding sites in their 3′-UTRs. WT TTP, but not a nonbinding TTP zinc finger mutant, binds to RNA probes that are based on the mRNA sequences ofCxcl1,Cxcl2,Ptgs2, andLif. TTP-promoted decay of transcripts encoding chemokines and other proinflammatory mediators is thus a critical posttranscriptional regulatory mechanism in the response of secondary cells, such as fibroblasts, to TNF released from primary immune cells [49].Neutrophils have the capacity to package a variety of cytokines into cytoplasmic granules for subsequent release upon inflammatory conditions. The rapid secretion of cytokines orchestrates the action of other immune cells at the infection site and contributes to the development and chronicity of inflammatory diseases. Naegelen et al. [50] studied the intracellular SNARE machinery responsible for the regulation of cytokine secretion and degranulation and demonstrated that syntaxin-3 (STX3) is required for the maximal release of IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-12b, and CCL4 without alteration of other cytokine secretions in dHL-60 cells. STX3 is involved in MMP-9 exocytosis from gelatinase granules, where STX3 is partly localized. The secretion of IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-12b, and CCL4 occurs during gelatinase degranulation, a process controlled by STX3 which has an essential role in trafficking pathways of cytokines in neutrophil granulocytes.Sestrins (Sesns) are conserved antioxidant proteins that accumulate in cells in response to various stresses. Yang et al. [51] investigated whether Sesn2 regulates Toll-like receptor- (TLR-) mediated inflammatory signaling and sought to identify the molecular mechanism responsible. Sesn2 almost completely inhibits LPS-induced NO release and iNOS expression. A gene knockdown experiment confirmed the role of Sesn2 in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. Proinflammatory cytokine release and expression are inhibited in Sesn2-expressing cells. Sesn2 prevents LPS-elicited cell death and ROS production via inhibition of NADPH oxidase. NF-κB and AP-1 are redox-sensitive transcription factors that regulate the expressions of diverse inflammatory genes. Sesn2 specifically inhibits AP-1 luciferase activity and its DNA binding, but not those of NF-κB. AP-1 inhibition by Sesn2 is due to a lack of JNK, p38, and c-Jun phosphorylation. Sesn2 protects galactosamine (Gal)/LPS-induced liver injury in mice infected with a recombinant adenovirus Sesn2 (Ad-Sesn2). Ad-Sesn2 causes less severe hepatic injury as supported by decreases in the ALT, AST, and hepatocyte degeneration. Ad-Sesn2 attenuates Gal/LPS-induced proinflammatory gene expression. Sesn2 inhibits TLR-induced proinflammatory signaling and protects cells by inhibiting JNK- or p38-mediated c-Jun phosphorylation.


## 6. Conclusions

Abundant data provide support to a multidimensional crosstalk among neural, endocrine, and immune signals probably contributing to global homeostasis, constant surveillance to maintain control against exogenous and/or endogenous stressors, brain maturation and development, neuroprotection, and fine-tuning of brain functions associated with higher activities of the CNS. Neuroimmune dysfunction may be part of the pathogenesis of different CNS disorders, including mental disorders (SCZ, depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder), neurodegenerative disorders (AD, Parkinson’s disease, and Prion disease), brain infections, stroke, brain tumors, and demyelinating disorders. It is likely that the neuroimmune system acts as a regulatory, defense system which reacts against noxious stimuli that endanger brain function stability and optimum performance. In this context, neuroimmune activation in CNS pathology might be a double-faced reactive phenomenon: (i) neuroprotective, when the stimulus activating the neuroimmune cascade is able to neutralize tissue damage and/or brain dysfunction and (ii) neurotoxic, when the reactive neuroinflammatory event is persistent and becomes an autoaggression which magnifies the damage. This Sword of Damocles (dual role) hanging over the CNS and other peripheral tissues under central control must be exquisitely balanced to avoid dangerous decompensation (dominance of neurotoxic effects over neuroprotective effects). This homeostatic equilibrium can be maintained by the interplay of different cytokines, chemokines, neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, neurohormones, and pleiotropic substances such as histamine. This biogenic amine, acting on different receptors or emanating from different sources (neuronal histamine versus nonneuronal histamine) can exert antagonistic effects (neurotrophic versus neurotoxic) on neuronal targets inducing either protection or damage. Although there was a growing interest for neuroimmune function and neuroinflammation during the past two decades, with relevant scientific contributions to the field, our impression is that the present knowledge on neuroimmune mechanisms and their pathological consequences is still at a very primitive stage. Therapeutic intervention to halt progression of deleterious neuroinflammatory reactions in CNS disorders is a major challenge for molecular psychoneuropharmacology in the future [6].



---

*Source: 1924603-2016-04-13.xml*