# Characterization and Digital Restauration of XIV-XV Centuries Written Parchments by Means of Nondestructive Techniques: Three Case Studies

Authors: L. Pronti; M. Perino; M. Cursi; M. L. Santarelli; A. C. Felici; M. P. Bracciale
Journal: Journal of Spectroscopy
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Parchment is the primary writing medium of the majority of documents with cultural importance. Unfortunately, this material suffers of several mechanisms of degradation that affect its chemical-physical structure and the readability of text. Due to the unique and delicate character of these objects, the use of nondestructive techniques is mandatory. In this work, three partially degraded handwritten parchments dating back to the XIV-XV centuries were analyzed by means of X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy,µ-ATR Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and reflectance and UV-induced fluorescence spectroscopy. The elemental and molecular results provided the identification of the inks, pigments, and superficial treatments. In particular, all manuscripts have been written with iron gall inks, while the capital letters have been realized with cinnabar and azurite. Furthermore, multispectral UV fluorescence imaging and multispectral VIS-NIR imaging proved to be a good approach for the digital restoration of manuscripts that suffer from the loss of inked areas or from the presence of brown spotting. Indeed, using ultraviolet radiation and collecting the images at different spectral ranges is possible to enhance the readability of the text, while by illuminating with visible light and by collecting the images at longer wavelengths, the hiding effect of brown spots can be attenuated.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Parchment was one of the most important writing supports used in the Middle Ages [1, 2]. Several kinds of animal skins were used (sheep, goat, and calf); the most precious skin was that obtained from the foetuses of lambs, named chartavirginea, due to its high white colour, thin thickness, and strength. The dermis, which is an intermediate layer of the skin constituted by fibrillar collagen, was the most used for obtaining parchments [3, 4].In the manufacturing of the parchments, the removal of derma from vellum and the weakening of the epidermis involved mechanical and chemical practices in which vegetal infusions, dung, flour, lime, and sodium sulphide were used. Often, tanning procedures were required. The addition of sodium chloride permitted the conservation of the skin (salting process).In the Mediterranean areas, gypsum powder was added to accelerate drying of parchments and to increase the absorption of ink. In some cases, the parchment surface was treated with egg white, fats, vegetal oils, tannin, and alum to obtain more stability of the support to the hygrometric variations and it was subjected to a smoothing process with pumice [1].Regarding the written parchments, pigments or colorant mixed with vegetal gum (arabic gum, cherry tree gum, and tragacanth gum) or egg white or egg yolk was used to produce red and blue inks. Cinnabar or vermillion was used for the red inks and azurite or lazurite (or ultramarine blue) for the blue ones [5].The first black inks used were based on carbon pigments (charcoal, bone black, and vine black) mixed with thickening agents such as arabic gum, animal glue, egg white, honey, linseed oil, and olive oil. The conservation of these mixtures could be ensured by the addition of camphor, cloves, vinegar, and garlic juice. Although these inks were known to impart a deep black colour, they were also very sensitive to moisture and could easily be destroyed by contact with water [6]. Iron gall inks arose as an alternative to the carbon-based ones, and there is proof of several “homemade” recipes from the 5th century until around 18th century, when trade manufacturing started [7]. It is difficult to fix the exact date in which carbon inks were superseded by iron gall inks though it can be stated that the latter was the first choice for writing purpose by the end of the late Middle Ages. Evidently, the more fluid character that ensured permeability into parchments and the brilliance of the black colour have led to the gradual replacement of carbon with iron gall inks [7].These inks were mainly obtained from the extraction of tannic and gallic acids from several kinds of galls (usually oak galls) by soaking and/or boiling them in water and wine with the addition of ferrous sulphate (known as vitriol or copperas) [6–11]. Addensants (arabic gum, egg white, tragacanth gum, etc.), fluidifiers (hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid, etc.), and antifermentatives (vinegar) were usually added to bind the ink to the writing surface and to make it more stable, leading to a great brilliance and deep colour. The gallic acid reacts with the ferrous sulphate forming the ferrous gallate, which is colourless until the complete oxidation in air (ferric pyrogallate) [12]. The main benefit of the iron gall ink lies in its real difficulty in removal from the support, making this the ink of choice for writing official and important documents until the first years of the 20th century, when it was replaced by other types of inks with less corrosive properties. However, iron gall ink was made with a very wide variety of recipes and ingredients that varied with geographic areas and time period. Indeed, two inks can be chemically heterogeneous and suffer different degradation processes, even if they are produced following the same recipe. Iron gall ink corrosion is the result of two generally accepted mechanisms that interact and feed each other: acid hydrolysis and iron-catalyzed oxidation. According to Banik [13], the more destructive is the iron-catalyzed oxidation, which is strongly influenced by natural ageing, storage, temperature, and relative humidity. This process can be caused by an excess of iron in the ink and/or by the presence of other transition metals, such as copper or zinc (impurities in the vitriol or intentional addition) [14]. Research has shown that a stable ink can be obtained with a 1 : 3 ratio of iron to tannin [15]. Indeed, an excess of ferrous sulphate leads to a change of the ink’s colour from black to brown due to chain reactions with oxygen and the formation of iron oxides, while the excess of tannin and a high level of humidity implicate the bleaching of the inks and the migration of sulphuric acid in the parchment. Furthermore, the permanence of iron gall ink depends on the manner in which they have been applied on the writing support [16]. For these reasons, documents written with iron gall ink frequently degrade to the point where it becomes challenging to read the text.In the last 15 years, hyperspectral and multispectral imaging technique has been widely used for the imaging of fine art paintings [17, 20] and ancient documents, aiming at the analysis of the materials used [21, 22] and the digital restoration of degraded or erased parts [23]. Hyperspectral and multispectral imaging has been developed by combining both digital imaging and spectroscopy. These imaging techniques provide better image quality than may be obtained from a colour digital camera, revealing specific spectral ranges and/or infrared wavelengths that cannot be detected by the human eye. In case of erased inks on ancient manuscripts, UV fluorescence images can improve the readability of the text. This phenomenon is related to the presence of ink or its traces that attenuate the visible fluorescence of the support [23, 24]. In case of coloured spots covering the text, it is sometimes possible to select some spectral ranges in which they are transparent, enabling to stand out the ink. This means that spectral images may help palaeographers read old manuscripts by enhancing the contrast between the under- and overwriting texts or inks that have partially or completely disappeared.In this context, our goal is to use nondestructive techniques to characterize three written parchments dating back to the XIV-XV centuries: “Provvisorio 34 bis 8839/c” (XIV century), “Provvisorio 37 8839/o and 8839/t” (XIV century), and “Provvisorio 38” containing a fragment of “Filocolo” by Giovanni Boccaccio (XV century). The nondestructive techniques are energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy,µ-attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and reflectance and UV-induced fluorescence spectroscopy. Furthermore, in order to perform a digital restoration of the texts, multispectral UV fluorescence imaging and VIS-NIR multispectral imaging were used.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. The Parchments

The three handwritten parchments belong to the collection of the Library of the Department of History, Cultures and Religions at University of Rome Sapienza (Figure1): (i) The “Provvisorio 34 bis 8839/c” (labelled in this paper “Parch. 34”), dating back to the 14th century, is a two-sheet fragment written in Latin. The text is a medical treatise written with black/brown ink, with blue and red painted initials and red ink used for the rubrics (lat. rubrum, red). Red and blue flourished initials were added. The black ink has disappeared in some areas of the last folio. (ii) The “Provvisorio 37 8839/o and 8839/t” (labelled in this paper “Parch. 37”), dating back to the 14th century, is a two-sheet fragment written in Latin. The text is a commentary on Seneca’s plays written by Nicholas Trevet with black/brown ink and red painted initials. Some written areas are covered by brown spots that do not allow the text to be read. (iii) The “Provvisorio 38” (labelled in this paper “Parch. 38”), dating back to the 15th century, is a one-sheet fragment written in Italian. It contains a fragment of “Filocolo” by Giovanni Boccaccio. The text is written with black/brown ink, and initials are painted in blue and red ink with red and violet flourished decorations, respectively. The black ink on the verso side appears extremely degraded.Figure 1
Images of the studied parchments: (a) Provvisorio 34 bis 8839/c (“Parch. 34”), (b) Provvisorio 37 8839/o and 8839/t” (“Parch. 37”), and (c) Provvisorio 38 (“Parch. 38”).
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 2.2. Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (EDXRF)

The spectrometer consists of an X-ray tube (Amptek Mini-X) with an anode target of rhodium and a beryllium window of thickness 127µm and was powered with an accelerating potential difference of 30 kV and an electronic current of 100 µA. The detector is a Peltier-cooled silicon drift with amplifier and integrated multichannel analyser (Amptek 123-SDD), providing for any detected X-ray photon a current pulse with amplitude proportional to the energy of the photon. The detector has a surface area of 25 mm2, a thickness of 500 µm, and a beryllium window of thickness 12.5 µm. The energy resolution is 140 eV, full width half maximum (FWHM) of the manganese Kα line at 5.9 keV. The geometry between primary beam, sample, and detector is fixed at 0°/45° relative to the normal of the sample surface. The X-ray beam collimation was 1 mm, and the acquisition time was 200 seconds.


### 2.3. Micro-Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (µ-ATR-FTIR)

Analyses were performed with an FTIR spectrometer (Vertex 70v, Bruker Optik GmbH) coupled with an infrared microscope (Hyperion 2000, Bruker Optics GmbH) equipped with a standard single element midband photoconductive mercury-cadmium-telluride (MCT) detector cooled by liquid nitrogen, a 20x Cassegrain objective, and a Ge ATR crystal. Spectra were collected with a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1 in the range 4000–600 cm−1 using 256 scans.


### 2.4. Reflectance and UV-Induced Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Reflectance spectroscopy was performed with an Avantes AvaSpec spectrophotometer equipped with a halogen lamp (HL-2000 FHSA, Avantes). The spectrometer uses a diffraction grating of 300 lines/mm, blazed at 500 nm, which allows coverage of the spectral range from 300 nm to 1100 nm, and a CCD linear sensor (2048 pixels). The spectral resolution is 0.8 nm. We illuminated and collected the light at 90° with respect to the surface with a reflection probe constituted by 7 optical fibers, 200µm core, 6 for illuminating and 1 for collecting the diffuse light (FCR-7UV200-2, Avantes). The reflectance spectra were collected from 350 to 800 nm. In some cases, the reflectance spectra were converted in absorbance following this formula: A = log (1/R).Fluorescence spectroscopy was performed with an LED UV (emitting at 365 nm; High Power LED M365D1, Thorlabs) as excitation source and the previously described spectrometer. The surface was illuminated at 45° using a bifurcated fiber (diameter of 600μm), connected to the source; the fluorescence emission from the surface was collected with a 200 μm diameter fiber at 90° with respect to the surface. The fluorescence spectra were collected over the wavelength range from 400 to 800 nm. Since the fluorescence emission on parchments presents different intensities due to the superficial inhomogeneities, the normalization of the spectra was performed to compare the spectral features of the investigated materials.


### 2.5. Multispectral Imaging

The multispectral imaging was performed with a monochromatic camera (QSI 583-w) equipped with a Leica optical system and eleven Thorlabs narrow-band interference filters (FWHM = 10 nm), with the central wavelengths at 380 nm, 390 nm, 400 nm, 410 nm, 420 nm, 450 nm, 470 nm, 500 nm, 550 nm, 600 nm, and 680 nm. All images were properly calibrated using dark and flat frames. For the visible imaging, two halogen lamps and two white LED lamps were used, while two UV lamps composed of three UV LEDs (High Power LED M365D1, Thorlabs), characterized by a spectral emission peaked at 365 nm with a FWHM of 10 nm and an optical output power of 190 mW for each LED were used for the UV fluorescence imaging. The sources were placed at 45° with respect to the normal samples, following the standard illumination geometry used for imaging. The multispectral UV fluorescence images were radiometrically calibrated; namely, all the images were corrected for the spectral sensitivity of the CCD camera, the spectral transmittance of the optical lens, and the filters [17]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed as chemometric tool for the analysis of multiple images [25–28]. The image calibration and processing were performed by using Matlab 2017a (the MathWorks Inc., USA) and HYPER-Tools (Free Graphical User Interface for Hyperspectral Image Analysis) software.


## 2.1. The Parchments

The three handwritten parchments belong to the collection of the Library of the Department of History, Cultures and Religions at University of Rome Sapienza (Figure1): (i) The “Provvisorio 34 bis 8839/c” (labelled in this paper “Parch. 34”), dating back to the 14th century, is a two-sheet fragment written in Latin. The text is a medical treatise written with black/brown ink, with blue and red painted initials and red ink used for the rubrics (lat. rubrum, red). Red and blue flourished initials were added. The black ink has disappeared in some areas of the last folio. (ii) The “Provvisorio 37 8839/o and 8839/t” (labelled in this paper “Parch. 37”), dating back to the 14th century, is a two-sheet fragment written in Latin. The text is a commentary on Seneca’s plays written by Nicholas Trevet with black/brown ink and red painted initials. Some written areas are covered by brown spots that do not allow the text to be read. (iii) The “Provvisorio 38” (labelled in this paper “Parch. 38”), dating back to the 15th century, is a one-sheet fragment written in Italian. It contains a fragment of “Filocolo” by Giovanni Boccaccio. The text is written with black/brown ink, and initials are painted in blue and red ink with red and violet flourished decorations, respectively. The black ink on the verso side appears extremely degraded.Figure 1
Images of the studied parchments: (a) Provvisorio 34 bis 8839/c (“Parch. 34”), (b) Provvisorio 37 8839/o and 8839/t” (“Parch. 37”), and (c) Provvisorio 38 (“Parch. 38”).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 2.2. Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (EDXRF)

The spectrometer consists of an X-ray tube (Amptek Mini-X) with an anode target of rhodium and a beryllium window of thickness 127µm and was powered with an accelerating potential difference of 30 kV and an electronic current of 100 µA. The detector is a Peltier-cooled silicon drift with amplifier and integrated multichannel analyser (Amptek 123-SDD), providing for any detected X-ray photon a current pulse with amplitude proportional to the energy of the photon. The detector has a surface area of 25 mm2, a thickness of 500 µm, and a beryllium window of thickness 12.5 µm. The energy resolution is 140 eV, full width half maximum (FWHM) of the manganese Kα line at 5.9 keV. The geometry between primary beam, sample, and detector is fixed at 0°/45° relative to the normal of the sample surface. The X-ray beam collimation was 1 mm, and the acquisition time was 200 seconds.


## 2.3. Micro-Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (µ-ATR-FTIR)

Analyses were performed with an FTIR spectrometer (Vertex 70v, Bruker Optik GmbH) coupled with an infrared microscope (Hyperion 2000, Bruker Optics GmbH) equipped with a standard single element midband photoconductive mercury-cadmium-telluride (MCT) detector cooled by liquid nitrogen, a 20x Cassegrain objective, and a Ge ATR crystal. Spectra were collected with a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1 in the range 4000–600 cm−1 using 256 scans.


## 2.4. Reflectance and UV-Induced Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Reflectance spectroscopy was performed with an Avantes AvaSpec spectrophotometer equipped with a halogen lamp (HL-2000 FHSA, Avantes). The spectrometer uses a diffraction grating of 300 lines/mm, blazed at 500 nm, which allows coverage of the spectral range from 300 nm to 1100 nm, and a CCD linear sensor (2048 pixels). The spectral resolution is 0.8 nm. We illuminated and collected the light at 90° with respect to the surface with a reflection probe constituted by 7 optical fibers, 200µm core, 6 for illuminating and 1 for collecting the diffuse light (FCR-7UV200-2, Avantes). The reflectance spectra were collected from 350 to 800 nm. In some cases, the reflectance spectra were converted in absorbance following this formula: A = log (1/R).Fluorescence spectroscopy was performed with an LED UV (emitting at 365 nm; High Power LED M365D1, Thorlabs) as excitation source and the previously described spectrometer. The surface was illuminated at 45° using a bifurcated fiber (diameter of 600μm), connected to the source; the fluorescence emission from the surface was collected with a 200 μm diameter fiber at 90° with respect to the surface. The fluorescence spectra were collected over the wavelength range from 400 to 800 nm. Since the fluorescence emission on parchments presents different intensities due to the superficial inhomogeneities, the normalization of the spectra was performed to compare the spectral features of the investigated materials.


## 2.5. Multispectral Imaging

The multispectral imaging was performed with a monochromatic camera (QSI 583-w) equipped with a Leica optical system and eleven Thorlabs narrow-band interference filters (FWHM = 10 nm), with the central wavelengths at 380 nm, 390 nm, 400 nm, 410 nm, 420 nm, 450 nm, 470 nm, 500 nm, 550 nm, 600 nm, and 680 nm. All images were properly calibrated using dark and flat frames. For the visible imaging, two halogen lamps and two white LED lamps were used, while two UV lamps composed of three UV LEDs (High Power LED M365D1, Thorlabs), characterized by a spectral emission peaked at 365 nm with a FWHM of 10 nm and an optical output power of 190 mW for each LED were used for the UV fluorescence imaging. The sources were placed at 45° with respect to the normal samples, following the standard illumination geometry used for imaging. The multispectral UV fluorescence images were radiometrically calibrated; namely, all the images were corrected for the spectral sensitivity of the CCD camera, the spectral transmittance of the optical lens, and the filters [17]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed as chemometric tool for the analysis of multiple images [25–28]. The image calibration and processing were performed by using Matlab 2017a (the MathWorks Inc., USA) and HYPER-Tools (Free Graphical User Interface for Hyperspectral Image Analysis) software.


## 3. Results and Discussion

After the characterization of the parchments, the assessment of the inks is presented and discussed colour by colour. The results of EDXRF analysis are reported in Table1.Table 1
EDXRF counts.
Sample
SiK
PK
SK
ClK
KK
CaK
TiK
CrK
MnK
FeK
CoK
NiK
CuK
ZnK
AsK
BrL
SrK
BaL
HgL
PbL
34_parchment
36
66
1269
540
662
12298
121
142
129
1019
n.d.
177
170
289
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
136
n.d.
380
37_parchment
39
73
344
n.d.
414
12965
131
n.d.
70
811
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
349
n.d.
n.d.
188
37_parchment
59
83
502
669
969
12271
93
n.d.
117
775
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
274
191
n.d.
n.d.
38_parchment
n.d.
n.d.
443
728
146
6323
117
n.d.
n.d.
325
n.d.
n.d.
100
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
202
n.d.
n.d.
34_black ink
42
112
2005
104
837
11098
141
112
547
4536
n.d.
n.d.
17026
7137
n.d.
n.d.
114
186
163
315
34_black ink
171
74
2203
119
1261
11947
184
61
514
4996
n.d.
105
14106
5880
n.d.
n.d.
124
94
n.d.
351
34_black ink
106
84
1921
n.d.
1828
16255
224
n.d.
258
8951
n.d.
164
376
535
n.d.
n.d.
135
n.d.
183
456
37_black ink
73
85
1449
483
1321
15769
140
n.d.
212
5974
n.d.
119
2705
1217
n.d.
n.d.
456
227
n.d.
170
37_black ink
84
122
1070
610
827
16269
154
n.d.
127
3232
n.d.
n.d.
1392
603
n.d.
n.d.
423
257
n.d.
113
37_black ink
63
92
1422
209
1130
11786
n.d.
n.d.
131
4741
n.d.
n.d.
2234
1074
n.d.
n.d.
319
327
n.d.
136
37_brown ink
64
71
1059
895
1377
11182
216
n.d.
159
3558
n.d.
n.d.
117
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
215
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
38_black ink
33
82
516
358
508
10380
215
n.d.
123
3167
n.d.
n.d.
1462
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
34_red ink
84
154
3119
208
356
5909
125
n.d.
126
1531
n.d.
n.d.
3863
1781
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
170
41613
n.d.
34_red ink
86
300
6261
n.d.
n.d.
3626
262
96
n.d.
1091
295
n.d.
7110
n.d.
383
2199
n.d.
n.d.
228186
n.d.
37_red ink
128
285
4910
310
n.d.
9451
108
n.d.
n.d.
2447
181
71
1287
710
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
170
60315
n.d.
37_red ink
95
229
5004
n.d.
7502
1231
n.d.
118
n.d.
1242
213
n.d.
651
161
n.d.
191
208
n.d.
108960
n.d.
38_red ink
111
388
7374
n.d.
n.d.
2601
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
1119
214
n.d.
552
118
4647
302
n.d.
514
238820
n.d.
38_red ink
n.d.
101
1885
227
n.d.
7389
125
n.d.
n.d.
1097
n.d.
91
447
n.d.
591
n.d.
n.d.
200
41682
n.d.
34_blue ink
115
77
935
214
928
11490
258
150
100
1816
n.d.
129
16453
343
194
n.d.
115
199
412
451
34_blue ink
371
66
1643
n.d.
219
4513
460
n.d.
334
5328
160
306
320155
2869
3082
n.d.
103
779
19885
379
38_blue ink
95
92
2206
191
144
3149
1099
n.d.
300
4360
n.d.
n.d.
216958
620
n.d.
n.d.
91
2257
29917
n.d.
38_purple ink
37
45
647
302
201
10024
104
n.d.
n.d.
1417
n.d.
98
506
n.d.
921
n.d.
n.d.
288
2052
n.d.
n.d.: not detected.


### 3.1. The Parchments

The three parchments are characterized by the presence of calcium (Ca), sulphur (S), chlorine (Cl), iron (Fe), and potassium (K), as shown in Table1. The occurrence of calcium is linked to the use of lime (CaO, CaCO3, Ca(OH)2) for the dehairing and the weakening of the skin and chalk (CaSO4) to accelerate the drying and to raise the writability of the surface [1]. The presence of sulphur can be attributed to the use of chalk, as mentioned above, and/or sodium sulphide, added to accelerate the pretreatment procedure of the parchment. However, sulphur is also a constituent of the proteinaceous structures (i.e., cysteine). The chlorine content is probably related to the sodium chloride bath performed to avoid the putrefaction of the skins. Two of the parchments (Parch. 34 and Parch. 37) show the presence of silicon (Si), probably ascribed to the smoothing processes performed by means of pumices [1]. The other elements, among which iron, can be considered as contaminants. The ATR-FTIR spectrum of the “Parch. 34” is shown in Figure 2(a). Most of the general patterns of collagen are identified: the Amide A bands, the Amide B bands, and the Amide I, II, and III bands. The ATR-FTIR spectrum revealed that parchment support was gelatinized, as confirmed by the presence of a band at 1030 cm−1 due to C–O–C stretching of the saccharide structure of the gelatin [29, 30]. In this parchment are present also gypsum (CaSO4 ∙ 2H2O) with the absorption bands at 3523 cm−1, 3394 cm−1, 1113 cm−1, 670 cm−1, and 602 cm−1 and calcite (CaCO3) with the absorption bands at 1796 cm−1, 1414 cm−1 (partially overlapped by the collagen bands), and 874 cm−1 [31]. The presence of gypsum can be attributed to different sources: (a) it can be added during the treatment of the parchment [1], and (b) it can be formed from the reaction between the sulphates migrated from the ink to the ink-free parchment and the Ca ions [4, 6]. “Parch. 37” and “Parch. 38” show ATR-FTIR spectra similar to the one of the previous parchments; an example is reported in Figures 2(b)–2(d), respectively.Figure 2
ATR-FTIR spectrum of parchments: (a) Parch. 34, (b) Parch. 37, and (c, d) two areas of Parch. 38.The absence of a band at 1730 cm−1 suggests that tannins, historically employed in the surface treatment of the parchment, were not used [3]. All the band assignments are reported in Table 2.Table 2
Assignment of the main ATR-FTIR bands of the three parchments.
Wavenumber (cm−1)
Band assignments
Parch. 34
Parch. 37
Parch. 38
3523; 3394
Gypsum (νOH)
3294
3291
3291
Collagen (Amide A) [4]
3087
3076
3078
Collagen (Amide B) [4]
2932; 2854
2919; 2854
2924; 2854
Collagen (νC–H) [4]
1796
ν
1 + ν4 combination band of CO3= [31]
1631
1631
1642
Collagen (Amide I) [overlapping withδH–O–H (approx. 1610) of structural H2O] [4]
1541
1548
1545
Collagen (Amide II)
1440
1430
1430
δCH2 [4]
1415
1413
1413
δipC–O–H (carboxylic side chains), δNH2 [4], ν3 asymmetric of CO3= [3, 31]
1333
1337
1323
ωCH2/δC–H (methine) [4]
1236
1240
1242
Amide III [3]
1200
1200
νC–O–C and δC–H [3]
1162
1162
NH3 + residual modes [30]
1140 (sh)
ν
3 calcium sulphate [4]
1113
Gypsum (ν3 SO4=) [4]
1080 (sh)
1081
1081
νC–O or skeletal ν [30]
1034
1034
1034
νC–N [30]or νC–O–C and νC–O [3]
874
874
874
ν
2 asymmetric of CO3= [3, 25]
711 (sh)
ν
4 symmetric of CO3=
670
662
Gypsum (δantis SO4=)
602
602
Gypsum (ν4as SO4=) [4]
ν = stretching; δ = bending; d = deformation; ip = in-plane; sh = shoulder.


### 3.2. The Inks

#### 3.2.1. Black

The inks of Parch. 34 and Parch. 37 present similar elemental composition, characterized by zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), barium (Ba), and lead (Pb), as shown in Table1, except for Parch. 34, in which higher counts of copper (Cu) occur, probably related to the intentional addition of copper sulphate in the manufacturing of the ink. The ink of Parch. 38 is characterized by copper (Cu) and iron (Fe). Zinc, barium, and lead were not detected. The presence of calcium (Ca) in all the inks could come from the support. The ATR-FTIR spectra of the inked areas on Parch. 34 are dominated by the parchment infrared bands, but we assisted at the increasing of the band at 1031 cm−1 indicating the presence of tannins [3, 4], as shown in Figure 3. Furthermore, gypsum and calcite were detected [3, 32]. For Parch. 37, the spectra of the black inked areas differ from the one of the parchments in the presence of the absorption bands of the oxalates (1620 cm−1, 1316 cm−1, and 780 cm−1) [33] and gypsum, as shown in Figure 4. The presence of oxalates can suggest a biological attack due to fungal species that can reprecipitate secondary carbonates and biomineralize hyphae with both calcite and whewellite [29]. Both the inked areas show a strong band at 1038 cm−1, indicating the presence of gallic acid, and a shoulder at 1730 cm−1, indicating the presence of gallic acid or tannins [3, 4]. Also, the ink of parchment 38 presents oxalates (1620 cm−1 and 1322 cm−1) and gypsum (1109 cm−1 and 670 cm−1), but we also detected starch (1150 cm−1, 1081 cm−1, and 1017 cm−1), as shown in Figure 5. This substance could be added on the parchment in order to improve the writability of the surface [34], or it could be used as a restoration adhesive [1, 14, 35]. Indeed, as can be seen in Figure 5 (inset), an area of the parchment conserving the black ink shows a strong yellowing compared to the not-visible inked areas, suggesting a superficial treatment.Figure 3
ATR-FTIR spectra of the inked area: (a) Parch. 34 and (b) related parchment.Figure 4
ATR-FTIR spectra of two black inked areas: (a, b) Parch. 37 and (c) related parchment.Figure 5
ATR-FTIR spectra of two black inked areas: (a, b) Parch. 38. The inset shows the yellowing effect due to a superficial treatment.Moreover, images of all written parchments taken with the CCD camera equipped with a band-pass filter centered at 1000 nm reveal almost no contrast between the inks and the parchment (FigureS1 in Supplementary Materials). This spectral feature is typical of iron gall inks [26, 27]. Thus, from the results obtained by the multianalytical approach adopted in this study, it can be stated that the three parchments are written with iron gall inks.


#### 3.2.2. Red

All red inks are made of cinnabar or vermillion (HgS) as suggested by the high counts of mercury (Hg) detected by EDXRF (Table1) and reflectance measurements (Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials) [36, 37]. The red inks of Parch. 38 and 34 show the presence of arsenic (As). In the latter, arsenic also is present in the blue ink, suggesting contamination or a residue of a conservation treatment [38]. Instead, in Parch. 38, this element is present only in the red ink, suggesting the use of cinnabar with accessory minerals, such as realgar (As4S4) and/or orpiment (As2S3) [37]. Parch. 38 presents starch, as shown in the ATR-FTIR spectra (Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials), that has been probably spread on the whole surface of the writing support. The use of this substance is also supposed for Parch. 34 although its characteristic band partially overlaps with that of gypsum. In the red ink of “Parch. 37,” ATR-FTIR analysis reveals the presence of calcite (Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials), but no other compounds linked to the red ink are detected due to the presence of the black ink on the other side of the parchment which modifies the spectrum. Bromine (Br) was detected in some red initials of the three parchments (Table 1) and could be related to the presence of a purple dye [39, 40] or to a conservation product, containing bromine, commonly used on ancient manuscripts [41]; however, it was not detected in the related parchments.


#### 3.2.3. Blue

All blue inks include copper (Cu) (Table1) as well as the typical ATR-FTIR (see Figure S4 in Supplementary Materials) and reflectance spectra of azurite (Figure S5 in Supplementary Materials). The blue ink of Parch. 34 also included arsenic (As), probably due to conservation treatments.


#### 3.2.4. Purple

The purple ink has been used in Parch. 38 in the red initials. The EDXRF analysis revealed the presence of mercury (Hg), which could be a contamination from the nearest initial letter inked with cinnabar. Bromine is not detected, suggesting that the Tyrian purple has not been used. The ATR-FTIR spectrum shows the presence of starch (FigureS6 in Supplementary Materials), as in the other inks of Parch. 38. The reflectance spectrum shows two absorption bands at 540 nm and 580 nm (Figure 6(a)) that could be related to the presence of folium (or turnsole), a colorant produced by Chrozophora tinctoria plant, widely used on manuscripts [42]. The fluorescence spectrum of the parchment (Figure 6(b)) exhibits a strong emission at shorter wavelengths (λmax = 460 nm), while the purple ink also shows an emission at 605 nm that confirms the use of folium, as reported by Aceto et al. [40].Figure 6
Reflectance spectrum in log (1/R) coordinates of the purple lines (shown in the inset, 150x magnification): (a) Parch. 38 and (b) fluorescence spectra of the purple ink and the related parchment.
(a)
(b)


### 3.3. Multispectral Imaging for Digital Restoration

Parch. 34 appears to be strongly degraded in the last folio with the loss of some written areas, as shown in Figure7(a). The text is more visible after illuminating the parchments with ultraviolet (UV) radiation and capturing the fluorescence at shorter wavelength (λ = 420 nm) for the flat surface of the parchment and at longer wavelengths (λ = 680 nm) for the folds of the parchment, as shown in Figures 7(b) and 7(c), respectively. In the near-infrared (NIR) range, the black areas and the ink in the fluorescence images disappear, as shown in Figure 7(d). Moreover, from the fluorescence images, we find that the number reported in the upper right side, which seems to be a “3” in the visible image (Figure 7(a)), is certainly a “8.” In order to improve the readability of the text, taking into account the spectral behavior of the entire set of multiple images, a principal component analysis (PCA) via singular values decomposition (SVD) and without mean centering was performed, as shown in Figures 7(e)–7(f).Figure 7
Photography (a) and UV fluorescence images taken at 420 nm (b), 680 nm (c), and 800 nm (d) of details of Parch. 34. (e, f) Image processing results by PCA: score image of PC1 (variance 98.68%) and score image of PC3 (variance 0.32%).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)A similar result was obtained from the lost inked areas on Parch. 37 (Figure8(a)), but in this case, the text is readable with filters at short wavelengths, as shown in Figure 8(b). In the presence of brown spots, the use of filters at long wavelengths can improve the contrast between the text and the backgrounds in the UV fluorescence images, as shown in Figure 8(f). However, by illuminating with visible light and collecting images at long wavelengths, we can exploit the transparency of the brown pigmented areas in these spectral ranges, improving the readability of the text, as shown in Figure 9. In this case, the image processing by PCA improves the contrast between the parchment and the written areas, as shown in Figures 8(g) and 9(d).Figure 8
Photography (a, d) and UV fluorescence images taken at 420 nm (b, e) and 680 nm (c, f) of two details of Parch. 37. (g, h) Image processing results by PCA: score image of PC1 (variance 99.26%) and score image of PC2 (variance 0.57%).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)Figure 9
Photography (a) and visible images taken at 600 nm (b) and 680 nm (c) of details of Parch. 37. (d, e) Image processing results by PCA: score image of PC1 (variance 98.62%) and score image of PC2 (variance 0.68%).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)Parch. 38 exhibits a strong loss of the text, which is completely restored by illuminating the parchment with UV radiation. All the images, taken at different spectral intervals, led to a better readability of the text, and some examples are reported in Figure10. Moreover, the purple ink used for the flourished initials exhibits fluorescence in the NIR spectral range, as shown in Figures 10(f)–10(h).Figure 10
Photography (a) and UV fluorescence images taken at 470 nm (b), 500 nm (c), 532 nm (d), 600 nm (e), 680 nm (f), 700 nm (g), and 750 nm (h) of a detail of Parch. 38. (i, j) Image processing results by PCA: score image of PC1 (variance 99.41%) and score image of PC2 (variance 0.54%).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)


## 3.1. The Parchments

The three parchments are characterized by the presence of calcium (Ca), sulphur (S), chlorine (Cl), iron (Fe), and potassium (K), as shown in Table1. The occurrence of calcium is linked to the use of lime (CaO, CaCO3, Ca(OH)2) for the dehairing and the weakening of the skin and chalk (CaSO4) to accelerate the drying and to raise the writability of the surface [1]. The presence of sulphur can be attributed to the use of chalk, as mentioned above, and/or sodium sulphide, added to accelerate the pretreatment procedure of the parchment. However, sulphur is also a constituent of the proteinaceous structures (i.e., cysteine). The chlorine content is probably related to the sodium chloride bath performed to avoid the putrefaction of the skins. Two of the parchments (Parch. 34 and Parch. 37) show the presence of silicon (Si), probably ascribed to the smoothing processes performed by means of pumices [1]. The other elements, among which iron, can be considered as contaminants. The ATR-FTIR spectrum of the “Parch. 34” is shown in Figure 2(a). Most of the general patterns of collagen are identified: the Amide A bands, the Amide B bands, and the Amide I, II, and III bands. The ATR-FTIR spectrum revealed that parchment support was gelatinized, as confirmed by the presence of a band at 1030 cm−1 due to C–O–C stretching of the saccharide structure of the gelatin [29, 30]. In this parchment are present also gypsum (CaSO4 ∙ 2H2O) with the absorption bands at 3523 cm−1, 3394 cm−1, 1113 cm−1, 670 cm−1, and 602 cm−1 and calcite (CaCO3) with the absorption bands at 1796 cm−1, 1414 cm−1 (partially overlapped by the collagen bands), and 874 cm−1 [31]. The presence of gypsum can be attributed to different sources: (a) it can be added during the treatment of the parchment [1], and (b) it can be formed from the reaction between the sulphates migrated from the ink to the ink-free parchment and the Ca ions [4, 6]. “Parch. 37” and “Parch. 38” show ATR-FTIR spectra similar to the one of the previous parchments; an example is reported in Figures 2(b)–2(d), respectively.Figure 2
ATR-FTIR spectrum of parchments: (a) Parch. 34, (b) Parch. 37, and (c, d) two areas of Parch. 38.The absence of a band at 1730 cm−1 suggests that tannins, historically employed in the surface treatment of the parchment, were not used [3]. All the band assignments are reported in Table 2.Table 2
Assignment of the main ATR-FTIR bands of the three parchments.
Wavenumber (cm−1)
Band assignments
Parch. 34
Parch. 37
Parch. 38
3523; 3394
Gypsum (νOH)
3294
3291
3291
Collagen (Amide A) [4]
3087
3076
3078
Collagen (Amide B) [4]
2932; 2854
2919; 2854
2924; 2854
Collagen (νC–H) [4]
1796
ν
1 + ν4 combination band of CO3= [31]
1631
1631
1642
Collagen (Amide I) [overlapping withδH–O–H (approx. 1610) of structural H2O] [4]
1541
1548
1545
Collagen (Amide II)
1440
1430
1430
δCH2 [4]
1415
1413
1413
δipC–O–H (carboxylic side chains), δNH2 [4], ν3 asymmetric of CO3= [3, 31]
1333
1337
1323
ωCH2/δC–H (methine) [4]
1236
1240
1242
Amide III [3]
1200
1200
νC–O–C and δC–H [3]
1162
1162
NH3 + residual modes [30]
1140 (sh)
ν
3 calcium sulphate [4]
1113
Gypsum (ν3 SO4=) [4]
1080 (sh)
1081
1081
νC–O or skeletal ν [30]
1034
1034
1034
νC–N [30]or νC–O–C and νC–O [3]
874
874
874
ν
2 asymmetric of CO3= [3, 25]
711 (sh)
ν
4 symmetric of CO3=
670
662
Gypsum (δantis SO4=)
602
602
Gypsum (ν4as SO4=) [4]
ν = stretching; δ = bending; d = deformation; ip = in-plane; sh = shoulder.


## 3.2. The Inks

### 3.2.1. Black

The inks of Parch. 34 and Parch. 37 present similar elemental composition, characterized by zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), barium (Ba), and lead (Pb), as shown in Table1, except for Parch. 34, in which higher counts of copper (Cu) occur, probably related to the intentional addition of copper sulphate in the manufacturing of the ink. The ink of Parch. 38 is characterized by copper (Cu) and iron (Fe). Zinc, barium, and lead were not detected. The presence of calcium (Ca) in all the inks could come from the support. The ATR-FTIR spectra of the inked areas on Parch. 34 are dominated by the parchment infrared bands, but we assisted at the increasing of the band at 1031 cm−1 indicating the presence of tannins [3, 4], as shown in Figure 3. Furthermore, gypsum and calcite were detected [3, 32]. For Parch. 37, the spectra of the black inked areas differ from the one of the parchments in the presence of the absorption bands of the oxalates (1620 cm−1, 1316 cm−1, and 780 cm−1) [33] and gypsum, as shown in Figure 4. The presence of oxalates can suggest a biological attack due to fungal species that can reprecipitate secondary carbonates and biomineralize hyphae with both calcite and whewellite [29]. Both the inked areas show a strong band at 1038 cm−1, indicating the presence of gallic acid, and a shoulder at 1730 cm−1, indicating the presence of gallic acid or tannins [3, 4]. Also, the ink of parchment 38 presents oxalates (1620 cm−1 and 1322 cm−1) and gypsum (1109 cm−1 and 670 cm−1), but we also detected starch (1150 cm−1, 1081 cm−1, and 1017 cm−1), as shown in Figure 5. This substance could be added on the parchment in order to improve the writability of the surface [34], or it could be used as a restoration adhesive [1, 14, 35]. Indeed, as can be seen in Figure 5 (inset), an area of the parchment conserving the black ink shows a strong yellowing compared to the not-visible inked areas, suggesting a superficial treatment.Figure 3
ATR-FTIR spectra of the inked area: (a) Parch. 34 and (b) related parchment.Figure 4
ATR-FTIR spectra of two black inked areas: (a, b) Parch. 37 and (c) related parchment.Figure 5
ATR-FTIR spectra of two black inked areas: (a, b) Parch. 38. The inset shows the yellowing effect due to a superficial treatment.Moreover, images of all written parchments taken with the CCD camera equipped with a band-pass filter centered at 1000 nm reveal almost no contrast between the inks and the parchment (FigureS1 in Supplementary Materials). This spectral feature is typical of iron gall inks [26, 27]. Thus, from the results obtained by the multianalytical approach adopted in this study, it can be stated that the three parchments are written with iron gall inks.


### 3.2.2. Red

All red inks are made of cinnabar or vermillion (HgS) as suggested by the high counts of mercury (Hg) detected by EDXRF (Table1) and reflectance measurements (Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials) [36, 37]. The red inks of Parch. 38 and 34 show the presence of arsenic (As). In the latter, arsenic also is present in the blue ink, suggesting contamination or a residue of a conservation treatment [38]. Instead, in Parch. 38, this element is present only in the red ink, suggesting the use of cinnabar with accessory minerals, such as realgar (As4S4) and/or orpiment (As2S3) [37]. Parch. 38 presents starch, as shown in the ATR-FTIR spectra (Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials), that has been probably spread on the whole surface of the writing support. The use of this substance is also supposed for Parch. 34 although its characteristic band partially overlaps with that of gypsum. In the red ink of “Parch. 37,” ATR-FTIR analysis reveals the presence of calcite (Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials), but no other compounds linked to the red ink are detected due to the presence of the black ink on the other side of the parchment which modifies the spectrum. Bromine (Br) was detected in some red initials of the three parchments (Table 1) and could be related to the presence of a purple dye [39, 40] or to a conservation product, containing bromine, commonly used on ancient manuscripts [41]; however, it was not detected in the related parchments.


### 3.2.3. Blue

All blue inks include copper (Cu) (Table1) as well as the typical ATR-FTIR (see Figure S4 in Supplementary Materials) and reflectance spectra of azurite (Figure S5 in Supplementary Materials). The blue ink of Parch. 34 also included arsenic (As), probably due to conservation treatments.


### 3.2.4. Purple

The purple ink has been used in Parch. 38 in the red initials. The EDXRF analysis revealed the presence of mercury (Hg), which could be a contamination from the nearest initial letter inked with cinnabar. Bromine is not detected, suggesting that the Tyrian purple has not been used. The ATR-FTIR spectrum shows the presence of starch (FigureS6 in Supplementary Materials), as in the other inks of Parch. 38. The reflectance spectrum shows two absorption bands at 540 nm and 580 nm (Figure 6(a)) that could be related to the presence of folium (or turnsole), a colorant produced by Chrozophora tinctoria plant, widely used on manuscripts [42]. The fluorescence spectrum of the parchment (Figure 6(b)) exhibits a strong emission at shorter wavelengths (λmax = 460 nm), while the purple ink also shows an emission at 605 nm that confirms the use of folium, as reported by Aceto et al. [40].Figure 6
Reflectance spectrum in log (1/R) coordinates of the purple lines (shown in the inset, 150x magnification): (a) Parch. 38 and (b) fluorescence spectra of the purple ink and the related parchment.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2.1. Black

The inks of Parch. 34 and Parch. 37 present similar elemental composition, characterized by zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), barium (Ba), and lead (Pb), as shown in Table1, except for Parch. 34, in which higher counts of copper (Cu) occur, probably related to the intentional addition of copper sulphate in the manufacturing of the ink. The ink of Parch. 38 is characterized by copper (Cu) and iron (Fe). Zinc, barium, and lead were not detected. The presence of calcium (Ca) in all the inks could come from the support. The ATR-FTIR spectra of the inked areas on Parch. 34 are dominated by the parchment infrared bands, but we assisted at the increasing of the band at 1031 cm−1 indicating the presence of tannins [3, 4], as shown in Figure 3. Furthermore, gypsum and calcite were detected [3, 32]. For Parch. 37, the spectra of the black inked areas differ from the one of the parchments in the presence of the absorption bands of the oxalates (1620 cm−1, 1316 cm−1, and 780 cm−1) [33] and gypsum, as shown in Figure 4. The presence of oxalates can suggest a biological attack due to fungal species that can reprecipitate secondary carbonates and biomineralize hyphae with both calcite and whewellite [29]. Both the inked areas show a strong band at 1038 cm−1, indicating the presence of gallic acid, and a shoulder at 1730 cm−1, indicating the presence of gallic acid or tannins [3, 4]. Also, the ink of parchment 38 presents oxalates (1620 cm−1 and 1322 cm−1) and gypsum (1109 cm−1 and 670 cm−1), but we also detected starch (1150 cm−1, 1081 cm−1, and 1017 cm−1), as shown in Figure 5. This substance could be added on the parchment in order to improve the writability of the surface [34], or it could be used as a restoration adhesive [1, 14, 35]. Indeed, as can be seen in Figure 5 (inset), an area of the parchment conserving the black ink shows a strong yellowing compared to the not-visible inked areas, suggesting a superficial treatment.Figure 3
ATR-FTIR spectra of the inked area: (a) Parch. 34 and (b) related parchment.Figure 4
ATR-FTIR spectra of two black inked areas: (a, b) Parch. 37 and (c) related parchment.Figure 5
ATR-FTIR spectra of two black inked areas: (a, b) Parch. 38. The inset shows the yellowing effect due to a superficial treatment.Moreover, images of all written parchments taken with the CCD camera equipped with a band-pass filter centered at 1000 nm reveal almost no contrast between the inks and the parchment (FigureS1 in Supplementary Materials). This spectral feature is typical of iron gall inks [26, 27]. Thus, from the results obtained by the multianalytical approach adopted in this study, it can be stated that the three parchments are written with iron gall inks.


## 3.2.2. Red

All red inks are made of cinnabar or vermillion (HgS) as suggested by the high counts of mercury (Hg) detected by EDXRF (Table1) and reflectance measurements (Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials) [36, 37]. The red inks of Parch. 38 and 34 show the presence of arsenic (As). In the latter, arsenic also is present in the blue ink, suggesting contamination or a residue of a conservation treatment [38]. Instead, in Parch. 38, this element is present only in the red ink, suggesting the use of cinnabar with accessory minerals, such as realgar (As4S4) and/or orpiment (As2S3) [37]. Parch. 38 presents starch, as shown in the ATR-FTIR spectra (Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials), that has been probably spread on the whole surface of the writing support. The use of this substance is also supposed for Parch. 34 although its characteristic band partially overlaps with that of gypsum. In the red ink of “Parch. 37,” ATR-FTIR analysis reveals the presence of calcite (Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials), but no other compounds linked to the red ink are detected due to the presence of the black ink on the other side of the parchment which modifies the spectrum. Bromine (Br) was detected in some red initials of the three parchments (Table 1) and could be related to the presence of a purple dye [39, 40] or to a conservation product, containing bromine, commonly used on ancient manuscripts [41]; however, it was not detected in the related parchments.


## 3.2.3. Blue

All blue inks include copper (Cu) (Table1) as well as the typical ATR-FTIR (see Figure S4 in Supplementary Materials) and reflectance spectra of azurite (Figure S5 in Supplementary Materials). The blue ink of Parch. 34 also included arsenic (As), probably due to conservation treatments.


## 3.2.4. Purple

The purple ink has been used in Parch. 38 in the red initials. The EDXRF analysis revealed the presence of mercury (Hg), which could be a contamination from the nearest initial letter inked with cinnabar. Bromine is not detected, suggesting that the Tyrian purple has not been used. The ATR-FTIR spectrum shows the presence of starch (FigureS6 in Supplementary Materials), as in the other inks of Parch. 38. The reflectance spectrum shows two absorption bands at 540 nm and 580 nm (Figure 6(a)) that could be related to the presence of folium (or turnsole), a colorant produced by Chrozophora tinctoria plant, widely used on manuscripts [42]. The fluorescence spectrum of the parchment (Figure 6(b)) exhibits a strong emission at shorter wavelengths (λmax = 460 nm), while the purple ink also shows an emission at 605 nm that confirms the use of folium, as reported by Aceto et al. [40].Figure 6
Reflectance spectrum in log (1/R) coordinates of the purple lines (shown in the inset, 150x magnification): (a) Parch. 38 and (b) fluorescence spectra of the purple ink and the related parchment.
(a)
(b)


## 3.3. Multispectral Imaging for Digital Restoration

Parch. 34 appears to be strongly degraded in the last folio with the loss of some written areas, as shown in Figure7(a). The text is more visible after illuminating the parchments with ultraviolet (UV) radiation and capturing the fluorescence at shorter wavelength (λ = 420 nm) for the flat surface of the parchment and at longer wavelengths (λ = 680 nm) for the folds of the parchment, as shown in Figures 7(b) and 7(c), respectively. In the near-infrared (NIR) range, the black areas and the ink in the fluorescence images disappear, as shown in Figure 7(d). Moreover, from the fluorescence images, we find that the number reported in the upper right side, which seems to be a “3” in the visible image (Figure 7(a)), is certainly a “8.” In order to improve the readability of the text, taking into account the spectral behavior of the entire set of multiple images, a principal component analysis (PCA) via singular values decomposition (SVD) and without mean centering was performed, as shown in Figures 7(e)–7(f).Figure 7
Photography (a) and UV fluorescence images taken at 420 nm (b), 680 nm (c), and 800 nm (d) of details of Parch. 34. (e, f) Image processing results by PCA: score image of PC1 (variance 98.68%) and score image of PC3 (variance 0.32%).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)A similar result was obtained from the lost inked areas on Parch. 37 (Figure8(a)), but in this case, the text is readable with filters at short wavelengths, as shown in Figure 8(b). In the presence of brown spots, the use of filters at long wavelengths can improve the contrast between the text and the backgrounds in the UV fluorescence images, as shown in Figure 8(f). However, by illuminating with visible light and collecting images at long wavelengths, we can exploit the transparency of the brown pigmented areas in these spectral ranges, improving the readability of the text, as shown in Figure 9. In this case, the image processing by PCA improves the contrast between the parchment and the written areas, as shown in Figures 8(g) and 9(d).Figure 8
Photography (a, d) and UV fluorescence images taken at 420 nm (b, e) and 680 nm (c, f) of two details of Parch. 37. (g, h) Image processing results by PCA: score image of PC1 (variance 99.26%) and score image of PC2 (variance 0.57%).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)Figure 9
Photography (a) and visible images taken at 600 nm (b) and 680 nm (c) of details of Parch. 37. (d, e) Image processing results by PCA: score image of PC1 (variance 98.62%) and score image of PC2 (variance 0.68%).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)Parch. 38 exhibits a strong loss of the text, which is completely restored by illuminating the parchment with UV radiation. All the images, taken at different spectral intervals, led to a better readability of the text, and some examples are reported in Figure10. Moreover, the purple ink used for the flourished initials exhibits fluorescence in the NIR spectral range, as shown in Figures 10(f)–10(h).Figure 10
Photography (a) and UV fluorescence images taken at 470 nm (b), 500 nm (c), 532 nm (d), 600 nm (e), 680 nm (f), 700 nm (g), and 750 nm (h) of a detail of Parch. 38. (i, j) Image processing results by PCA: score image of PC1 (variance 99.41%) and score image of PC2 (variance 0.54%).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)


## 4. Conclusions

The elemental and molecular techniques used in this work have proven to be useful for characterizing the parchments, inks, and pigments of three written fragments dating back to the XIV-XV centuries. The ATR-FTIR band at about 1030 cm−1 indicates gelatinization of the parchment 34. Moreover, the presence of many salts and impurities was detected, suggesting a fungal attack on almost all the inks. The presence of starch, detected on Parch. 38, indicates a conservation treatment spread over the whole surface. The texts were written with iron gall inks that present different elemental composition; particularly, Parch. 38 does not show impurities. Red and blue inks are based on pigments such as cinnabar (or vermillion) and azurite, but no binders could have been identified due to the interference of the parchments and contaminants.Multispectral imaging proved to be a good approach for the digital restoration of manuscripts that suffer from the loss of inked areas or from the presence of brown spotting. In particular, in the first case, the readability of the text is achieved by illuminating the manuscript with ultraviolet radiation and collecting the images at different spectral ranges, while in the second case, the hiding effect of brown spots can be overcome by illuminating with visible light and collecting the images at longer wavelengths. Although the selection of single spectral band could be sufficient to increase the contrast between the parchment and the text, the principal component analysis (PCA) has proved to be a useful processing technique to further increase the readability of the text.



---

*Source: 2081548-2018-08-05.xml*