# New Medium for Pharmaceutical GradeArthrospira

Authors: Amro A. Amara; Alexander Steinbüchel
Journal: International Journal of Bacteriology
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The aim of this study is to produce a pharmaceutical grade single cell product ofArthrospira from a mixed culture. We have designed a medium derived from a combination between George’s and Zarrouk’s media. Our new medium has the ability to inhibit different forms of cyanobacterium and microalgae except the Chlorella. The medium and the cultivation conditions have been investigated to map the points where only Arthrospira could  survive. For that, a mixed culture of pure Chlorella and Arthrospira (~90 : 10) has been used to develop the best medium composition that can lead to the enrichment of the Arthrospira growth and the inhibition of the Chlorella growth. To enable better control and to study its growth, an 80 l photobioreactor has been used. We have used high saline (2xA-St) medium which has been followed by in fermentor reducing its concentration to 1.5x. The investigation proves that Chlorella has completely disappeared. A method and a new saline medium have been established using a photobioreactor for in fermentor production of single cell Arthrospira. Such method enables the production of pure pharmaceutical grade Arthrospira for medicinal and pharmaceutical applications or as a single cell protein.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Using algae as a food and medicine is deeply rooted in the  human history. In ancient Egypt and today, farmers used to collect floating algae on the surface of the water to feed their domestic birds. In a harsh environment when the land resources food become rare, alkaline lakes play a significant role as an alternative source. The alkaline lakes enable the growth of one of the few nontoxic cyanobacterial species,Arthrospira fusiformis[1]. Humans learned early how to use the Arthrospiraas a food source. Seeing the migrant birds feed safely on Arthrospira, such as lesser flamingoes (Phoeniconaias minorGeoffroy), encourages such use. Kebeda (1997) reported that in Ethiopia, farmers and herdsmen living in areas close to the soda lakes make their cattle drink Arthrospirawater about once a month and believe that it has therapeutic effects and compensates for some lack in dietary food [2].The invention of the microscope enabled Turpin in 1827 to identify and describeArthrospiraas spiral cyanobacteria [3]. Species of Arthrospirahave been found in a variety of environments including soil, sand, marshes, brackish water, seawater, and freshwater [1, 4]. Rich (1931) has reported it as a dominant phytoplankton in a number of lakes in the Rift Valley of East Africa [5]. 113 years after its first microscopic identification, Arthrospirawas reintroduced to the world by Dangeard (1940) from a sample collected by Mr. Cŕeach (a pharmacist) from a local market in Shad [1, 6]. Arthrospiracontains high levels of proteins (50–70%), lipids (7–16%), vitamins, and omega-3 fatty acid [7–9]. For economic production of Arthrospira, it is usually cultivated in open ponds, so the absorbed solar energy is used to fix inorganic carbon. Arthrospirais produced in quantities exceeding 3000 tons/year of dry material [10]. In a survey concerning its production, Shimamatsu (2004) highlighted that its contamination by other algal species is one of the main problems concerning its production in the open ponds [10]. The analysis of its natural habitat enabled Zarrouk (1966) to introduce his famous alkaline medium [11]. Moreover, scientists have observed that it has become the most dominant species in high salt content lakes (>30 g/L) [12]. For better understanding and growth control, closed tubular photobioreactors with working volumes ranging from 5 to 36,000 l were used for the production of different cyanobacteria including Arthrospira[13–18]. Arthrospira fusiformis(formerly Spirulina platensis) is the main microalgae which is produced commercially in large scale as food or as nutraceutical food and single cell protein [19]. Arthrospiracan grow in extremoalkalophilic and halophilic habitat as well as in fresh water [1]. It is used in the diets of fish and poultry and even sold as a healthy  food [8]. It has been utilized for the production of cyanocobalamin (B12),  antioxidant pigments like β-carotene, tocopherols, and γ-linolenic acid [7, 8, 20, 21].The deep blue color of phycocyanin and other extractable pigments including myxoxanthophyll and zeaxanthin have been widely used as naturally occurring colorants for food additive purposes [22–25]. Phycocyanin and the Arthrospira’s exopolysaccharide have anticancer, antioxidant, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory activities and can be used as a tonic agent for the immune system [26, 27]. Producers used to increase alkalinity to reduce the number of algal species [10]. Arthrospirauses sunlight and CO2 to grow (autotrophic) or organic compounds (auxotrophic) or both (autoauxotrophic). For economic production of Arthrospira, alkaline open ponds are usually used for large-scale production. However, the major problem in its biomass production is the contamination with other algae and cyanobacteria which reduce the final product quality [10]. Few studies reported that Arthrospiracan resist high salinity and that it becomes dominant in part of the years in its natural habitat [1, 2, 12]. While alkaline open ponds mimic the Arthrospiranatural habitat, we are suggesting that salinity could play a significant role in Arthrospiraenrichment and that the rain/evaporation cycle on the lake and the lake’s surrounding area lead to salt accumulation, which leads to enrichment of Arthrospiraover other algal and cyanobacterial species. Salt stress has been studied with less attention in other Arthrospira-related subjects [2, 28, 29].In this study and for the first time, we introduce a simple strategy for single cellArthrospiraproduction in a photobioreactor using a new medium extracted from the nature and from the information in the literatures. We introduce two steps using the photobioreactor to eradicate Chlorellaand to gain 100% pure Arthrospira.


## 2. Material and Methods

### 2.1. Chemical

All chemicals used were analytical grade and obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and Roth.


### 2.2. Cyanobacteria Strains

The extremoalkalophilic cyanobacteria strains used in this study were isolated from Lake Maryut, Alexandria, Egypt, and were identified using a light microscope asArthrospira and Chorella. Arthrospira was identified by Sharaf et al. (2010) as A. fusiformis by sequencing and analysis of the PC-IGS regions in the gene  of phycocyanin [26].TheA. fusiformis and Chlorella  spp. strains were grown and cultivated routinely in Zarrouk’s or George’s media at room temperature (20–25°C) in lab condition under lamp/sunlight [11].


### 2.3. Media

#### 2.3.1. George’s Medium

One liter of George’s medium consists of peptone 1.00 g, KNO3 0.20 g, K2HPO4 0.02 g, MgSO4·7H2O 0.02 g, and Ferric citrate 0.035 g [30].


#### 2.3.2. Zarrouk’s Medium [11]

One liter of Zarrouk’s medium consists of (part A) NaHCO3 16.80 g and K2HPO4 0.50 g; (part B) NaNO3 2.50 g, K2SO4 1.00 g, NaCl 1.00 g, MgSO4·7H2O 0.20 g, EDTA-Na2·2H2O 0.08 g, CaCl2·2H2O 0.04 g, and FeSO4·2H2O 0.01 g; trace elements mixture A (part C 10 mL/l): 1.00 mL, trace elements mixture B (part D 1.0 mL/l): 1.00 mL; part C mg/L: H3BO3 2.86, MnCl2·4H2O 1.810 g, ZnSO4·7H2O 0.222 MoO3·0.015, and CuSO4·5H2O 0.074 (the used amount is 10 mL/l); part D mg/L: NH4VO3 22.9, NiSO4·7H2O 47.8, NaWO2 17.9, Ti2(SO4)3·6H2O, and Co(NO3)2·6H2O 4.4 (the amount used was 1.0 mL/l) [11].


#### 2.3.3. Amara and Steinbüchel (A-St) Medium 1x

One liter medium of A-St consists of (part A) NaHCO3 9.214 g, NaCO3 7.143 g, and K2HPO4 0.5 g; (part B) NaNO3 1.5 g, K2SO4 0.571 g, NaCl 1 g, MgSO4·7H2O 0.2 g, CaCl2·2H2O 0.012 g, FeSO4·2H2O 0.01 g, and EDTA-Na2·2H2O 0.08 g; (part C) ferric citrate 0.018 g; (part D) peptone 0.1 g; yeast extract 0.01 g.


### 2.4. Photobioreactor

The photobioreactor used in this study was installed at the Institut für Molekulare Mikrobiologie ünd Biotekhnologie,  Westfälishen Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany, and has been previously described in detail by Hai et al. (2000) [16]. Its major features are as follows: it is made from helical Boresist DN80 glass tube (14m) (Schott Glaswerke, Mainz, Germany) and is connected to a degassing chamber (8.0 l) (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). The photobioreactor surface/volume (s/v) ratio is about 44/m (Figure 1). The top of the degassing chamber was closed with a stainless steel plate providing ports (Figure 1(b)). A sealed pump module connected to a two-blade propeller was installed in the bottom of the photobioreactor and supplied with Pt-100 temperature sensor and contained an outlet to release the cell for harvesting (Figures 1(a), 1(b)). Three supplied light panels were placed in the interspaces and on both longitudinal sides of the photobioreactor. Each light panel contained 10 Osram Nature Deluxe, U- or L- shaped tubes (Osram, Munich, Germany) for maximum photon flux. The light intensity of each panel could be varied by dimming (Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c)). Lighting with photon flux of approximately 0, 100, 400, and 600 μE/m2 xs was applied to the cultivation process. Sterility of gas inlet or outlet was maintained by the ceramic bacterial filter.Figure 1
(a) Night profile of the photobioreactor showing the light system. (b) Degassing chamber and its stainless steel cover which contains different ports and growth mentoring probes (e.g., pH meter, CO2 and O2 electrodes, temperature sensor, and sample collection port). (c) Light growth of the Arthrospiraafter the medium dilution. (d) Heavy growth of the Arthrospiraat the end of the cultivation process. (e) Static cultivation of Arthrospirausing sun light only.


### 2.5. In Flask Cultivation

250 mL flasks each contains 50 mL of Zarrouk’s medium or George’s medium were used for routine cultivation. When we used Zarrouk’s medium, part A was autoclaved, while part B and the trace elements solutions A and B were sterilized separately using a bacterial membrane filter  (0.22μm). For routine cultivation, light from a florescent lamp/sunlight and temperature ranging from 20 to 25°C under static condition were used.


### 2.6. In 20 l Bottle Cultivation

20 l bottle was used to draw the 2x medium from the photobioreactor during the dilution process. The removed 2x medium was adjusted to 1.5x and theArthrospira  was allowed to grow (under static condition same as above) (Figure 1(e)).


### 2.7. In Photobioreactor Medium Sterilization and Cultivation

The entire photobioreactor, except light panels and motor, was sterilized after adding 69 l of tap water containing  part A from 2x A-St medium using model 6612-1 ED chamber autoclave (KSG Sterilization GmBH, Olching, Germany). Part B and part C were sterilized separately using sterile bacterial membrane filter (0.22μm). The total volume of the medium constituents  has been made to 1 l and added separately to the photobioreactor to achieve a total volume of 70 l. Part 4 which contains the yeast extract/peptone was autoclaved using normal autoclave. The electrodes and the ceramic filters were sterilized separately.


### 2.8. Cultivation Condition

The photobioreactor enabled automatic control. The temperature was set to 30°C and was adjusted automatically. The stirrer speed (motor speed), the pO2, and the pH were monitored automatically. The parameters at the starting point were pH 9.34, pO2 80, motor speed 0 rpm, temperature 26°C, and 600 μE/m2 xs. Samples were taken regularly and whenever possible.


### 2.9. Cell Dry Weight (CDW)

CDW was calculated by correlating weight to volume as g/L. Filter papers or gauze, or both, were used. The paper or gauze was weighed before being  used and dried after filtration, and the weight correlated to the volume was used as CDW g/L.


### 2.10. Microscopic Examination

Samples were drawn from the photobioreactor regularly and whenever possible and were examined using light microscope.


### 2.11. Salinity and Media Composition Study

A comparison study was done between the different used media to understand their different effect onArthrospiragrowth based on their cation, anion, and salt constituents.


### 2.12. Arthrospira Total Biomass Collection

For collecting the total biomass of theArthrospira, filtration was performed using sponge covered with gauze.


### 2.13. Biomass Drying

TheArthrospirawet biomass was dried under aseptic conditions by passing sterile air over the Arthrospirabiomass in a sterile microbial cultivation cabinet.


## 2.1. Chemical

All chemicals used were analytical grade and obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and Roth.


## 2.2. Cyanobacteria Strains

The extremoalkalophilic cyanobacteria strains used in this study were isolated from Lake Maryut, Alexandria, Egypt, and were identified using a light microscope asArthrospira and Chorella. Arthrospira was identified by Sharaf et al. (2010) as A. fusiformis by sequencing and analysis of the PC-IGS regions in the gene  of phycocyanin [26].TheA. fusiformis and Chlorella  spp. strains were grown and cultivated routinely in Zarrouk’s or George’s media at room temperature (20–25°C) in lab condition under lamp/sunlight [11].


## 2.3. Media

### 2.3.1. George’s Medium

One liter of George’s medium consists of peptone 1.00 g, KNO3 0.20 g, K2HPO4 0.02 g, MgSO4·7H2O 0.02 g, and Ferric citrate 0.035 g [30].


### 2.3.2. Zarrouk’s Medium [11]

One liter of Zarrouk’s medium consists of (part A) NaHCO3 16.80 g and K2HPO4 0.50 g; (part B) NaNO3 2.50 g, K2SO4 1.00 g, NaCl 1.00 g, MgSO4·7H2O 0.20 g, EDTA-Na2·2H2O 0.08 g, CaCl2·2H2O 0.04 g, and FeSO4·2H2O 0.01 g; trace elements mixture A (part C 10 mL/l): 1.00 mL, trace elements mixture B (part D 1.0 mL/l): 1.00 mL; part C mg/L: H3BO3 2.86, MnCl2·4H2O 1.810 g, ZnSO4·7H2O 0.222 MoO3·0.015, and CuSO4·5H2O 0.074 (the used amount is 10 mL/l); part D mg/L: NH4VO3 22.9, NiSO4·7H2O 47.8, NaWO2 17.9, Ti2(SO4)3·6H2O, and Co(NO3)2·6H2O 4.4 (the amount used was 1.0 mL/l) [11].


### 2.3.3. Amara and Steinbüchel (A-St) Medium 1x

One liter medium of A-St consists of (part A) NaHCO3 9.214 g, NaCO3 7.143 g, and K2HPO4 0.5 g; (part B) NaNO3 1.5 g, K2SO4 0.571 g, NaCl 1 g, MgSO4·7H2O 0.2 g, CaCl2·2H2O 0.012 g, FeSO4·2H2O 0.01 g, and EDTA-Na2·2H2O 0.08 g; (part C) ferric citrate 0.018 g; (part D) peptone 0.1 g; yeast extract 0.01 g.


## 2.3.1. George’s Medium

One liter of George’s medium consists of peptone 1.00 g, KNO3 0.20 g, K2HPO4 0.02 g, MgSO4·7H2O 0.02 g, and Ferric citrate 0.035 g [30].


## 2.3.2. Zarrouk’s Medium [11]

One liter of Zarrouk’s medium consists of (part A) NaHCO3 16.80 g and K2HPO4 0.50 g; (part B) NaNO3 2.50 g, K2SO4 1.00 g, NaCl 1.00 g, MgSO4·7H2O 0.20 g, EDTA-Na2·2H2O 0.08 g, CaCl2·2H2O 0.04 g, and FeSO4·2H2O 0.01 g; trace elements mixture A (part C 10 mL/l): 1.00 mL, trace elements mixture B (part D 1.0 mL/l): 1.00 mL; part C mg/L: H3BO3 2.86, MnCl2·4H2O 1.810 g, ZnSO4·7H2O 0.222 MoO3·0.015, and CuSO4·5H2O 0.074 (the used amount is 10 mL/l); part D mg/L: NH4VO3 22.9, NiSO4·7H2O 47.8, NaWO2 17.9, Ti2(SO4)3·6H2O, and Co(NO3)2·6H2O 4.4 (the amount used was 1.0 mL/l) [11].


## 2.3.3. Amara and Steinbüchel (A-St) Medium 1x

One liter medium of A-St consists of (part A) NaHCO3 9.214 g, NaCO3 7.143 g, and K2HPO4 0.5 g; (part B) NaNO3 1.5 g, K2SO4 0.571 g, NaCl 1 g, MgSO4·7H2O 0.2 g, CaCl2·2H2O 0.012 g, FeSO4·2H2O 0.01 g, and EDTA-Na2·2H2O 0.08 g; (part C) ferric citrate 0.018 g; (part D) peptone 0.1 g; yeast extract 0.01 g.


## 2.4. Photobioreactor

The photobioreactor used in this study was installed at the Institut für Molekulare Mikrobiologie ünd Biotekhnologie,  Westfälishen Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany, and has been previously described in detail by Hai et al. (2000) [16]. Its major features are as follows: it is made from helical Boresist DN80 glass tube (14m) (Schott Glaswerke, Mainz, Germany) and is connected to a degassing chamber (8.0 l) (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). The photobioreactor surface/volume (s/v) ratio is about 44/m (Figure 1). The top of the degassing chamber was closed with a stainless steel plate providing ports (Figure 1(b)). A sealed pump module connected to a two-blade propeller was installed in the bottom of the photobioreactor and supplied with Pt-100 temperature sensor and contained an outlet to release the cell for harvesting (Figures 1(a), 1(b)). Three supplied light panels were placed in the interspaces and on both longitudinal sides of the photobioreactor. Each light panel contained 10 Osram Nature Deluxe, U- or L- shaped tubes (Osram, Munich, Germany) for maximum photon flux. The light intensity of each panel could be varied by dimming (Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c)). Lighting with photon flux of approximately 0, 100, 400, and 600 μE/m2 xs was applied to the cultivation process. Sterility of gas inlet or outlet was maintained by the ceramic bacterial filter.Figure 1
(a) Night profile of the photobioreactor showing the light system. (b) Degassing chamber and its stainless steel cover which contains different ports and growth mentoring probes (e.g., pH meter, CO2 and O2 electrodes, temperature sensor, and sample collection port). (c) Light growth of the Arthrospiraafter the medium dilution. (d) Heavy growth of the Arthrospiraat the end of the cultivation process. (e) Static cultivation of Arthrospirausing sun light only.


## 2.5. In Flask Cultivation

250 mL flasks each contains 50 mL of Zarrouk’s medium or George’s medium were used for routine cultivation. When we used Zarrouk’s medium, part A was autoclaved, while part B and the trace elements solutions A and B were sterilized separately using a bacterial membrane filter  (0.22μm). For routine cultivation, light from a florescent lamp/sunlight and temperature ranging from 20 to 25°C under static condition were used.


## 2.6. In 20 l Bottle Cultivation

20 l bottle was used to draw the 2x medium from the photobioreactor during the dilution process. The removed 2x medium was adjusted to 1.5x and theArthrospira  was allowed to grow (under static condition same as above) (Figure 1(e)).


## 2.7. In Photobioreactor Medium Sterilization and Cultivation

The entire photobioreactor, except light panels and motor, was sterilized after adding 69 l of tap water containing  part A from 2x A-St medium using model 6612-1 ED chamber autoclave (KSG Sterilization GmBH, Olching, Germany). Part B and part C were sterilized separately using sterile bacterial membrane filter (0.22μm). The total volume of the medium constituents  has been made to 1 l and added separately to the photobioreactor to achieve a total volume of 70 l. Part 4 which contains the yeast extract/peptone was autoclaved using normal autoclave. The electrodes and the ceramic filters were sterilized separately.


## 2.8. Cultivation Condition

The photobioreactor enabled automatic control. The temperature was set to 30°C and was adjusted automatically. The stirrer speed (motor speed), the pO2, and the pH were monitored automatically. The parameters at the starting point were pH 9.34, pO2 80, motor speed 0 rpm, temperature 26°C, and 600 μE/m2 xs. Samples were taken regularly and whenever possible.


## 2.9. Cell Dry Weight (CDW)

CDW was calculated by correlating weight to volume as g/L. Filter papers or gauze, or both, were used. The paper or gauze was weighed before being  used and dried after filtration, and the weight correlated to the volume was used as CDW g/L.


## 2.10. Microscopic Examination

Samples were drawn from the photobioreactor regularly and whenever possible and were examined using light microscope.


## 2.11. Salinity and Media Composition Study

A comparison study was done between the different used media to understand their different effect onArthrospiragrowth based on their cation, anion, and salt constituents.


## 2.12. Arthrospira Total Biomass Collection

For collecting the total biomass of theArthrospira, filtration was performed using sponge covered with gauze.


## 2.13. Biomass Drying

TheArthrospirawet biomass was dried under aseptic conditions by passing sterile air over the Arthrospirabiomass in a sterile microbial cultivation cabinet.


## 3. Results and Discussions

During our testing of media compositions usingChlorella and Arthrospira (both isolated by methods other than media enrichment) in one flask alone or plus a mixture of other unidentified algae (data not shown), we observed that a high amount of Na2CO3 (2% w/v) enables Arthrospiraand Chlorella to flourish but inhibits growth of other algae (Tables 1–3). Given that Arthrospiracan grow under auxotrophic condition, we used the peptone/yeast extract and tap water instead of the trace elements mixture. We have selected the components of our new medium from both George’s and Zarrouk’s media. George’s medium is a common medium for algae cultivation. George’s medium contains peptone and the tap water in its gradients. The constituents which are used for Zarrouk’s medium have been selected based on being a selective medium for the Arthrospira. By accident, we used a double concentration (2x) of A-St medium. The 2x medium upon its used found to be able to cure all the Chlorella. For that we developed a two-step strategy: first using 2x medium to eradicate Chlorella and then diluting the 2x medium to 1.5x so that Arthrospiracan flourish again (Tables 1–3). We used a light microscope to evaluate the process and showed  that after 2 days of cultivation Chlorella was completely eradicated. Moreover, Arthrospira survived in 2x of our medium without the yeast extract/peptone mixture. This initiated the idea to establish an in fermentor purification for Arthrospira heavily contaminated by Chlorella (10 Arthrospira : 90 Chlorella) (Figures 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), 1(d), and 1(e)). The cell dry weight (CDW) for Arthrospira in A-St 2x and 1.5x media is plotted on a linear or an exponential scale in Figures 1 and 2. The other parameters have been plotted against time in Figures 2 and 6.Table 1
Different used media and their compositions (salt, cation, and anion).
Compound
Cation
Anion
Cation subtotal mass (g/mol)
Anion subtotal mass (g/mol)
2x Amara-Steinbüchel
1.5x Amara-Steinbüchel
1x Amara-Steinbüchel
George’s  medium
Zarrouk    medium
2x 1 L
CationMol
AnionMol
NaMol
1.5x 1 L
CationMol
AnionMol
NaMol
1x 1 L
CationMol
AnionMol
NaMol
1x 1 L
CationMol
AnionMol
NaMol
1x 1 L
CationMol
AnionMol
NaMol
NaHCO3
Na
HCO3
22.99
61.02
18.43
0.8015
0.3020
0.8015
13.8214
0.6011
0.2265
0.6011
9.2142
0.4007
0.1510
0.4007
16.8000
0.73075
0.2753
0.7307
NaCO3
Na
CO3
22.99
60.01
14.29
0.6213
0.2380
0.6213
10.7142857
0.4660
0.1785
0.4660
7.1428
0.3106
0.1190
0.3106
K2HPO4
K
HPO4
78.2
95.98
1.00
0.0127
0.0104
0.7500
0.0095
0.0078
0.5000
0.0063
0.0052
0.0200
0.0002
0.0002
0.5000
0.0063
0.0052
NaNO3
Na
NO3
22.99
62.01
3.00
0.1304
0.0483
0.1304
2.2500
0.0978
0.0362
0.0978
1.5000
0.0652
0.0241
0.0652
2.5000
0.1087
0.0403
0.1087
K2SO4
K
SO4
96.07
78.2
1.14
0.0118
0.0146
0.8571
0.0089
0.0109
0.5714
0.0059
0.0073
1.0000
0.0104
0.0127
NaCl
Na
Cl
22.99
35.45
2.00
0.0869
0.0564
0.0869
1.5000
0.0652
0.0423
0.0652
1.0000
0.0434
0.0282
0.04349
1.0000
0.0434
0.0282
0.0434
MgSO4
Mg
SO4
24.31
96.07
0.31
0.0125
0.0031
0.2295
0.0094
0.0023
0.1530
0.0062
0.0015
0.0200
0.0008
0.0002
0.2000
0.0082
0.0020
CaCl2
Ca
Cl
40.08
70.91
0.02
0.0003
0.0002
0.01125
0.0002
0.0001
0.0075
0.0001
0.0001
0.0400
0.0009
0.0005
FeSO4
Fe
SO4
55.85
96.07
0.02
0.0002
0.0001
0.01215
0.0002175
0.0001
0.0081
0.0001
0.00008
0.0100
0.0001
0.0001
EDTA Na2
Na
EDTA
45.98
290.23
0.14
0.0031
0.0004
0.0034
0.1083
0.0023
0.0003
0.0026
0.0722
0.0015
0.0002
0.0017
0.0800
0.0017
0.0002
0.0017
Ferric Citrate
Ferric
Citrate
55.85
189.1
0.04
0.0006
0.0001
0.0262
0.0004
0.0001
0.0175
0.0003
0.00009
0.0350
0.0006
0.0001
KNO3
K
NO3
39.1
62.01
0.2000
0.0051
0.0032
Total
583.25
1293.13
40.37
1.6821
0.6741
1.6439
30.2803
1.2616
0.5056
1.2329
20.1868
0.8410
0.3370
0.8219
0.2750
0.0068
0.0038
0.0000
22.1300
0.9109
0.3648
0.8847Table 2
Water hardness of the different used media.
A-St 2x
A-St 1.5x
A-St 1x
George’s
Zarrouk’s
MgSO4
0.0125
0.0094
0.0062
0.0008
0.0082
CaCl2
0.0003
0.0002
00001
—
0.0009
Equivalent mg L−1 or ppm of CaCO3
1.28
e
+
3
957
628
—
907
French degree
128
95.7
62.8
—
90.7
German degree
71.4
53.6
35.2
—
50.8
English degree
89.3
67.0
43.9
—
63.8
Water hardness
Very hard water
Very hard water
Very hard water
Very hard waterTable 3
The % of the cells for bothChlorella and Arthrospira in different media.
Media names
Na
Chlorella
Arthrospira
George’s
0
99
1
A-St 1x
0.8129
92
8
Zarrouk’s
0.8847
90
10
A-St 1.5x
1.2329
30
70
A-St 2x
1.6439
0
100Figure 2
The overall cultivation process using photobioreactor. The heavy green line shows the CDW g/L.The growth curve ofArthrospira represents a typical growth curve of most microbes. It shows a typical lag, log, and stationary phase (Figure 2). The total yield of Arthrospira biomass as CDW was 0.979 g/L (68.53 g/70 l). As shown in Figure 2, the growth of Arthrospira in 2x medium is very weak even though it is still similar to the microbial growth curve in Figures 2, 3, and 4. The calculated productivity  P=(xend-xstart)/tend-tstart, where xend and xstart  are the CDW g/L at the 0 and end points and tend and tstart  are the times at 0 and end points. For cultivation using the 2x medium, the P1=0.00013 g/L/h, the calculated specific growth rate μ=(lnx2-lnx1)/(t2-t1)μ=0.0215/h, and the calculated generation time g=ln2/μ, g=32.23 h. By diluting the medium concentration to 1.5x as in Figures 3 and 4, the above values have been increased significantly, where P2=0.00304 g/L/h, μ=0.0406 g/h, and g=17.068. The significant increase in the Pincrease   and μ and the decrease in g at 1.5x medium prove that salinity is an essential factor in the Arthrospiraenrichment. The increase in each of theP, μ, and g has been calculated from the following formula:
(1)%Xincrease=[(X2*100)X1]-100,
where X is either P or  μ or g.Figure 3
Log CDW for theArthrospiraoverall cultivation process (A-St 2x and 1.5x media).Figure 4
Log CDW for theArthrospira at A-St 2x medium.The calculatedPincrease=2238.4%, μincrease=88.83%, and gincrease=-47.04%.μ  and g, for each of 2x and 1.5x have been calculated at nearly the same time from each starting point. We selected the best fitted points in the exponential growth curve at 2x medium cultivation as in Figure 4 from the following equation: for 2x cultivation the starting point (0 point) is at 0 h and the end point is at 160 h, while for 1.5x cultivation the 0 point is at 160 h and the end point is at 471 h.The best representative points in both cultivations have been calculated from the following formula:(2)Point2=(Point1-Point0(1))*2+(Point0(2)-Point1)Point2=(126-0)*2+(160-126)=286h.
Both of the 2x and 1.5x slopes have been selected from the best 4 matching points as in Figures 3 and 4, where Point0(1) and Point0(2)  are the starting points for each cultivation, respectively.Analysis of the five media used is summarized in Table1, and their constituents of anion, cation, and Na salt were calculated as Mol/l. A-St medium at 1x concentration is similar to Zarrouk’s medium, while 2x medium contains a high amount of salt. A-St 1.5 medium is located in the middle between x2 and both of A-St x1 and Zarrouk’s medium, and it gave the best result. The hardness of each medium has been calculated from the following formula:
(3)MCaCO3MCa=100.140.1=2.5MCaCO3MMg=100.124.3=4.1[CaCO3]=2.5[Ca+2]+4.1[Mg2+].
The different media used, except George’s medium, are very hard (Table 2). The increase in the Ca and Mg ions leads to an increase in the media total hardness. There is a reverse relationship between the % of Chlorellaand Arthrospirain different Na salt concentrations where Chlorelladecreases with increasing new salt concentration and vice versain the case of Arthrospira(Table 3). The relationship between pO2  and the ArthrospiraCDW is linear as shown in Figures 2 and 5; that is,  an increase in the ArthrospiraCDW causes an increase in pO2. Different light intensities, including 0, 200, 400, and 600, have been used as shown in Figure 6, and the pO2   is more sensitive for monitoring the effect of light in the cultivation process. In the lag and log phase, the change in light intensity is not clearly detected except at a few points (e.g., at 300 h). This is because in the lag phase cell growth and division are very slow and in the log phase they are very high. The change could not be detected clearly in both growth phases; however, in the stationary phase, where the growth becomes more stable and constant, the effect has been clearly observed and showed that the decrease in light intensity led to a decrease in growth as well as in the amount of the released pO2 as in Figure 6.Figure 5
Fitted curve of the CDW against pO2.Figure 6
The effect of the light in both pO2  and CDW g/L.Arthrospira can exist in harsh conditions, and it can even be used in bioremediation of toxic elements such as lead and other toxic elements and compounds [31, 32]. Heterotrophic metabolism is faster than autotrophic [33]. Aiming to eradicate Chlorella, we used stresses which included high levels of alkalinity, salinity, and autotrophic growth. Arthrospira proved to be able to survive in these conditions while Chlorella did not. In the photobioreactor, we used autotrophic conditions first to put Arthrospira and Chlorella in maximum expected stress (we added yeast extract/peptone mixture after diluting the medium to 1.5x). Temperature, which can affect pO2  and pH, was set to 30°C. After 160 h of these harsh conditions, the 2x A-St medium was then diluted to 1.5x, and the Arthrospira growth started to show an increase in its biomass as shown in Figures 1(b) and 1(c).We stopped the process after about 471 h after the growth rate had become saturated. The increase in the biomass is relatively equal to the increase in the pO2 (% of saturation) which is logical, while the elevation of O2 is an indicator of the cell growth and multiplication. pO2  and pH are negatively affected by temperature. The mixing process leads to an increase in the fermentation process temperature. However, the range of the change in each of the pH and O2 is narrow. The sudden change in pO2 amount means that there is a direct effect on the Arthrospira growth as in Figures 2, 3, and 4. The μ, P, and g parameters of the growth before and after the medium dilution prove that 1.5x A-St medium is better for growing Arthrospira than 2x A-St medium. This is another proof about the role of salinity level in the growth of cyanobacteria. Therefore, the analysis of the different media which have been used according to their anion, cation, and salinity is shown in Table 1. According to the data in Table 3 as well as that in Tables 1 and 2, salinity is the major factor which leads to the eradication of the Chlorella. On the other hand, Arthrospira proves to be a powerful strain that could resist different kind of stresses, especially those used in our study.This study did not investigate conditions forArthrospira overproduction or its active constituents' analysis, which should be covered in future studies. However, it clearly proves the role of salinity in its growth, in the enrichment, and in the inhibition of other algal species. Other Arthrospira should be tested as case-by-case study because there is great variability in the genotype and the stage of the growth cycle (as well as many other factors) as reported by Ruengjitchatchawalya et al. (2002) [34]. By mimicking its natural habitat and using the photobioreactor withinfermentor partial randomization for its cultivation conditions, we gain a better understanding  for Arthrospira growth conditions.


## 4. Conclusion

In conclusion, salinity was the major factor which leads to the dominance ofArthrospirarather than the alkalinity. Purifying Arthrospira from contaminated algae to reach a pharmaceutical grade using 2x/1.5x A-St media is a step to improve the Arthrospira quality. Tap water and yeast extract/peptone mixture can substitute the trace elements in the Arthrospira commercial production. The temperature could change the amount of pO2 and the pH value either by direct effect or by inducing chemical or physical changes. Arthrospira can sense any change in its environment. Arthrospira has proved to be more environmentally adapted to stress than Chlorella. In this study, we succeeded in developing a medium and cultivation conditions enabling the enrichment of the Arthrospira and the inhibition of the other algal species based on salinity. Using the photobioreactor and conducting a complete cultivation process (lag-log-stationary phases) have been proved to be the most efficient and quickest ways to understand the different responses of Arthrospira to the different modifications during its cultivation conditions. This study will open the way to produce a pure culture of Arthrospira. Most methods used nowadays do not guarantee pure Arthrospira production which affects its product quality. Our new method is not expensive, reliable, and cost effective. The medium which was taken from the fermentor during the dilution step can be diluted and reused. In fermentor Arthrospira can be produced without any algal or  cyanobacteria  contaminant. This will enable the production of pure Arthrospira and enables the purification of a previously produced contaminated Arthrospira (e.g., obtained from open ponds).



---

*Source: 203432-2013-12-28.xml*