# A New Fractal Multiband Antenna for Wireless Power Transmission Applications

Authors: Taoufik Benyetho; Jamal Zbitou; Larbi El Abdellaoui; Hamid Bennis; Abdelwahed Tribak
Journal: Active and Passive Electronic Components
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

The Microwave Power Transmission (MPT) is the possibility of feeding a system without contact by using microwave energy. The challenge of such system is to increase the efficiency of transmitted energy from the emitter to the load. This can be achieved by rectifying the microwave energy using a rectenna system composed of an antenna of a significant gain associated with a rectifier with a good input impedance matching. In this paper, a new multiband antenna using the microstrip technology and fractal geometry is developed. The fractal antenna is validated into simulation and measurement in the ISM (industrial, scientific, and medical) band at 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz and it presents a wide aperture angle with an acceptable gain for both bands. The final antenna is printed over an FR4 substrate with a dimension of 60 × 30 mm2. These characteristics make the antenna suitable for a multiband rectenna circuit use.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The wireless power transmission concept was introduced in the last decade of the 19th century by Nicola Tesla’s experiment in which he tried to light bulbs wirelessly by transmitting energy from distant oscillators operated to 100 MV at 150 KHz, but he could not implement his system for commercial use due to its very low efficiency [1]. After this contribution, researchers in Japan [2] and the United States [3] continued to improve the efficiency of wireless power transmission in 1920s and 1930s.1950 has known the true start of wireless power transmission thanks to the development of high power microwave tubes by Raytheon company [4]. In 1958, a 15 KW microwave tube had measured 81% DC to RF conversion efficiency [5, 6]. The first rectenna, conceived also by Raytheon company, came in the early 1960s. This Rectifying Antenna was composed of a half-wave dipole antenna associated with a balanced bridge or semiconductor diode placed over a reflecting plane. A resistive load was then connected to the output of the rectenna. The 2.45 GHz as transmitting frequency was privileged due to its advanced and efficient technology base, its minimal attenuation through the atmosphere even in bad weather, and its location at the center of an industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) band.The rectenna’s greatest conversion efficiency ever recorded was in 1977 by Brown in Raytheon company [7]. The rectenna operated at 2.45 GHz and reached 90.6% conversion efficiency with an input power level of 8 W. This rectenna element used GaAs-Pt Schottky barrier diode and aluminum bars to construct the dipole and transmission line. In 1982, 85% conversion efficiency was achieved, by using a rectenna printed thin film operated at 2.45 GHz [8].Other frequencies were used to design rectenna circuit like 35 GHz frequency [9, 10] which can decrease the transmitting and rectenna aperture areas and then increase the transmission range, but the problem is the high cost and inefficiency of components which generate high power at 35 GHz.Figure1 shows basic elements of a rectenna system. A rectenna circuit is composed of an antenna which collects the RF energy and a Schottky diode which rectifies this energy. The matching circuit between the antenna and the diode is a low pass filter designed to pass the fundamental frequency and reject the higher order harmonics generated from the nonlinear Schottky diode. The capacitor between the Schottky diode and the load behaves as a DC pass filter which protects the load from the HF harmonics.Figure 1
Block diagram of a rectenna circuit [11].In order to have an efficient rectenna circuit, the antenna must present good performance. A good return loss to avoid reflected energy, a big gain, and wide aperture angles to maximize RF harvested energy. The rectenna conversion efficiencyη is defined by (1) in [12]:(1)η=PDCPDC+PLOSS,where PDC is the output power and PLOSS is the loss power. Because the rectenna output is a DC power, the output power could be defined by(2)PDC=Vout2RL,where Vout is the output voltage of the rectifier and RL is the load.When only conduction losses of the diode are considered and all the other losses are neglected, the conversion efficiency can be determined by [12](3)η=11+Vd/2Vout.V d is the voltage drop across the conducting diode.Since its invention, the rectenna was used for various applications like RFID [16], SHARP (Stationary High Altitude Relay Platform) the microwave powered aircraft [17], and Solar Power Satellite (SPS). This last application concept is based on the construction of solar stations with great photovoltaic panels in space which will produce electricity that would be sent directly to Earth by microwaves to replace towers and power lines [18]. Recently, researchers introduced power through Wi-Fi, which permits charging batteries by Wi-Fi routers transmission [19].


## 2. Fractal Antenna Theory

Fractal antenna is an antenna based on fractal geometry. This term was first used by the French mathematician Mandelbrot in 1975 to describe a fractal shape that can be subdivided in many parts; each one of them is a reduced-size copy of the whole. Fractal term is derived from Latin word “Fractus” meaning “broken” [20]. Since the achievement of the first fractal antenna in 1995 [21], much progress proved that fractal geometry helps reduce antenna size and gives it a multiband behavior [21–25].The fractal dimensionD defined by (4) calculates the irregularity degree and fragmentation of a natural object or a geometric assembly [20]:(4)D=ln⁡Numberofselfsimilarpiecesln⁡1/magnificationfactor.The “Number of self similar pieces” represents the number of copies identical to the original shape when applying a fractal aspect from one step (or iteration) to another. The “magnification factor” signifies the scaling value between an iteration and the next one when applying a fractal technique.The fractal antenna developed in this paper is based on Sierpiński triangle fractal geometry introduced by the Polish mathematician Sierpiński in 1916 [26]. The Sierpiński triangle is obtained from an equilateral triangle by a repeated process or iteration. The first iteration consists of subdividing the equilateral triangle into four smaller congruent equilateral triangles and removing the central one. The result as illustrated in Figure 2 is 3 equilateral triangles with half the size of the original one.Figure 2
Sierpiński triangle at iterations from 0 to 4.To reach the second iteration, the same process is applied to the 3 equilateral triangles obtained in the first iteration; the result is 9 triangles and so on.The number of copies from an iteration to the next one is multiplied by 3 and the size of the triangles is divided by 2. In consequence, the Sierpiński triangle fractal dimension is(5)D=ln⁡3ln⁡1/1/2=1.58.The Sierpiński triangle is widely used in antenna design due to its multiband behavior. The resonant frequency of an antenna is related to its length. When applying Sierpiński fractal concept to an equilateral triangle, different equilateral triangles with diverse sizes are created that lead to the multiband aspect of Sierpiński triangle antenna as explained in Figure3.Figure 3
Sierpiński triangle multiband behavior.


## 3. Antenna Design and Measurement

### 3.1. Antenna Design

As explained above, Sierpiński triangle antenna is known for its multiband behavior. Some researches present accurate equations that predict the resonance frequencies of a standard Sierpiński antenna [27]. The problem is that the frequencies are related to the chosen dimensions that are defined in advance, so in order to design a Sierpiński antenna which resonates in frequencies different from those defined by equations, some modification of the standard design must be applied.As illustrated in Figure4, three antennas based on Sierpiński triangle at iterations 1, 2, and 3 are designed in order to study the fractal impact over this structure. The designed antennas differ from the standard Sierpiński triangle by the ground which is also a Sierpiński triangle, symmetric to the radiating patch. The substrate is an FR4 with relative permittivity equal to 4.4, 1.6 mm for thickness, and 0.025 for loss tangent. The simulation and optimization of the antenna were done by using CST Microwave Studio software.Figure 4
The patch (left) and the ground (right) of the designed antennas: (a) iteration 1, (b) iteration 2, and (c) iteration 3.
(a) (b) (c)Table1 summarizes the antennas parameters.Table 1
Antennas’ dimensions in mm.
Parameter Length a 65 b 30 c 26 d 25.8 e 1.3 f 15 g 4.7 i 3 j 3Figure5 shows that the simulated antennas return losses at the three iterations.Figure 5
The designed antennas return loss at iterations 1, 2, and 3.The three iterations present almost the same behavior in the simulated frequency range. The −10 dB simulated return loss bandwidths cover ISM 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz bands. From iteration 1 to iteration 3 the resonance frequencies decrease slightly, while the input impedance matching decreases at the lower band and increases at the higher band. It is deduced that applying a fractal aspect over the new Sierpiński triangle designed structure has a very low effect on the return loss results. For more detailed study theX-Z plane and the Y-Z plane radiation pattern as well as the current distribution of the three designed antennas are compared.Figure6 shows the antenna radiation pattern comparison of the three iterations at 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz.Figure 6
Antenna radiation pattern comparison of the three iterations at 2.4 GHz (XZ plane (a) and YZ plane (b)) and 5.8 GHz (XZ plane (c) and YZ plane (d)).
(a) (b) (c) (d)We notice that at 2.4 GHz the three iterations present exactly the same behavior: an omnidirectional propagation in theYZ plane (a) and a bidirectional radiation through the Z-axis (0° and 180°) in the XZ plane (b).At 5.8 GHz, the radiation pattern difference between the three iterations is very small. In theYZ plane, the propagation is almost omnidirectional at iterations 1 and 2 with some attenuation through the Y-axis and perfectly omnidirectional at iteration 3 but with smaller gain. In the XZ plane, even if the radiation is no longer bidirectional, the maximum of propagation is still through the Z-axis (0° and 180°).The simulation shows that the antenna radiation pattern characteristics stay almost stable at both resonance frequencies for the three iterations.Figure7 compares the antenna radiation pattern at 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz in the XZ plane (a) and YZ plane (b). In XZ plane, the low gain (2.1 dBi) at the 2.4 GHz is compensated by an aperture angle of 77° compared to 33° and a gain of 5.5 dBi at 5.8 GHz. In the YZ plane, the aperture angles at both resonance frequencies are very large. The gain is constant at 2.4 GHz (2.2 dBi) and attains 5.8 dBi at 5.8 GHz with little attenuation through the Y-axis.Figure 7
X - Z plane and Y-Z plane designed antennas radiation pattern at 2.45 GHz (a) and 5.8 GHz (b).
(a) (b)Figure8 illustrates the current distribution of the three iterations designed antennas for both bands 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz.Figure 8
Designed antennas current distribution at 2.45 GHz (left) and 5.8 GHz (right) in iterations 1 (a), 2 (b), and 3 (c).
(a) (b) (c)The current distribution is the same at the three iterations. At 2.4 GHz the current is distributed over all the structure while at 5.8 GHz it is more distributed in the half of the structure near to the feeding line.


### 3.2. Results and Discussion

After a study of the designed Sierpiński triangle antennas at the three first iterations, we deduced that the antennas characteristics do not change too much. We then chose to realize the structure at the second iteration as illustrated in Figure9.Figure 9
Realized antenna picture.Figure10 shows a comparison between simulated and measured return loss.Figure 10
Comparison between simulated and measured antenna return loss.The simulated and measured return losses show good agreement. The slight difference is generally related to connector use which is not considered during simulation. Table2 gives a numerical comparison of the validated bands.Table 2
Comparison between simulated and measured antenna return losses.
Bands Simulation Measurement Band 1 [2.25–2.8] GHz [2.35–2.86] GHz Band 2 [5.5–6] GHz [5.48–6.16] GHzThe −10 dB measured return loss bandwidths (19.5% and 11.7% at the low and high resonance frequencies, resp.) cover ISM 2.4 GHz (2.4–2.5 GHz) and 5.8 GHz (5.725–5.875 GHz) bands.Figure11 presents the XZ (E-plane) and YZ (H-plane) planes radiation pattern at frequencies 2.5 GHz (a and c) and 5.8 GHz (b and d).Figure 11
Measured radiation pattern of the realized antenna at 2.5 GHz (XZ plane (a) and YZ plane (c)) and 5.8 GHz (XZ plane (b) and YZ plane (d)).
(a) (b) (c) (d)The measured radiation at 2.5 GHz is distributed over all directions but presents a maximum through theZ-axis at 180° while it is concentrated in the upper part of the XZ plane at 5.8 GHz. In the YZ plane, the antenna radiates in all directions except around 180° through the Z-axis at both 2.5 GHz and 5.8 GHz.We notice that there is considerable radiation attenuation around 180° relative to the antenna back in theYZ plane and at 5.8 GHz in the XZ plane. After analysis we deduced that this attenuation is related to mechanical support of measurement that reflects the energy received from the horn antenna when the receiving antenna is turned back.The achieved antenna presents good characteristics that are suitable for wireless power transmission (WPT) applications. The size is small (60 × 30 mm2). The dual ISM bands covered by the antenna in this work are commonly used for WPT. The radiation pattern is almost omnidirectional in both bands, which permits harvesting a maximum of energy. The antenna gain could be improved by several techniques.In [28], authors designed an antenna array (4 elements) with multiple superstrates to improve the Sierpiński triangle antenna gain. The antenna operates at 860 MHz for RFID application. This method could be applied to our structure in order to enhance the gain and then the rectenna efficiency.Table3 compares the achieved antenna to other planar antennas used for rectenna application.Table 3
Performance comparison between the proposed antenna and other compact antennas.
Published literature versus proposed antenna Antenna size (mm2) Bands (GHz) Gain (dBi) This work 60 × 30 2.4 2.2 5.8 5.8 Reference [13] 45 × 30 5.2 4.4 5.8 6.6 Reference [14] 45 × 45 1.8 3.9 Reference [15] 135 × 93 2.4 10


## 3.1. Antenna Design

As explained above, Sierpiński triangle antenna is known for its multiband behavior. Some researches present accurate equations that predict the resonance frequencies of a standard Sierpiński antenna [27]. The problem is that the frequencies are related to the chosen dimensions that are defined in advance, so in order to design a Sierpiński antenna which resonates in frequencies different from those defined by equations, some modification of the standard design must be applied.As illustrated in Figure4, three antennas based on Sierpiński triangle at iterations 1, 2, and 3 are designed in order to study the fractal impact over this structure. The designed antennas differ from the standard Sierpiński triangle by the ground which is also a Sierpiński triangle, symmetric to the radiating patch. The substrate is an FR4 with relative permittivity equal to 4.4, 1.6 mm for thickness, and 0.025 for loss tangent. The simulation and optimization of the antenna were done by using CST Microwave Studio software.Figure 4
The patch (left) and the ground (right) of the designed antennas: (a) iteration 1, (b) iteration 2, and (c) iteration 3.
(a) (b) (c)Table1 summarizes the antennas parameters.Table 1
Antennas’ dimensions in mm.
Parameter Length a 65 b 30 c 26 d 25.8 e 1.3 f 15 g 4.7 i 3 j 3Figure5 shows that the simulated antennas return losses at the three iterations.Figure 5
The designed antennas return loss at iterations 1, 2, and 3.The three iterations present almost the same behavior in the simulated frequency range. The −10 dB simulated return loss bandwidths cover ISM 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz bands. From iteration 1 to iteration 3 the resonance frequencies decrease slightly, while the input impedance matching decreases at the lower band and increases at the higher band. It is deduced that applying a fractal aspect over the new Sierpiński triangle designed structure has a very low effect on the return loss results. For more detailed study theX-Z plane and the Y-Z plane radiation pattern as well as the current distribution of the three designed antennas are compared.Figure6 shows the antenna radiation pattern comparison of the three iterations at 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz.Figure 6
Antenna radiation pattern comparison of the three iterations at 2.4 GHz (XZ plane (a) and YZ plane (b)) and 5.8 GHz (XZ plane (c) and YZ plane (d)).
(a) (b) (c) (d)We notice that at 2.4 GHz the three iterations present exactly the same behavior: an omnidirectional propagation in theYZ plane (a) and a bidirectional radiation through the Z-axis (0° and 180°) in the XZ plane (b).At 5.8 GHz, the radiation pattern difference between the three iterations is very small. In theYZ plane, the propagation is almost omnidirectional at iterations 1 and 2 with some attenuation through the Y-axis and perfectly omnidirectional at iteration 3 but with smaller gain. In the XZ plane, even if the radiation is no longer bidirectional, the maximum of propagation is still through the Z-axis (0° and 180°).The simulation shows that the antenna radiation pattern characteristics stay almost stable at both resonance frequencies for the three iterations.Figure7 compares the antenna radiation pattern at 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz in the XZ plane (a) and YZ plane (b). In XZ plane, the low gain (2.1 dBi) at the 2.4 GHz is compensated by an aperture angle of 77° compared to 33° and a gain of 5.5 dBi at 5.8 GHz. In the YZ plane, the aperture angles at both resonance frequencies are very large. The gain is constant at 2.4 GHz (2.2 dBi) and attains 5.8 dBi at 5.8 GHz with little attenuation through the Y-axis.Figure 7
X - Z plane and Y-Z plane designed antennas radiation pattern at 2.45 GHz (a) and 5.8 GHz (b).
(a) (b)Figure8 illustrates the current distribution of the three iterations designed antennas for both bands 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz.Figure 8
Designed antennas current distribution at 2.45 GHz (left) and 5.8 GHz (right) in iterations 1 (a), 2 (b), and 3 (c).
(a) (b) (c)The current distribution is the same at the three iterations. At 2.4 GHz the current is distributed over all the structure while at 5.8 GHz it is more distributed in the half of the structure near to the feeding line.


## 3.2. Results and Discussion

After a study of the designed Sierpiński triangle antennas at the three first iterations, we deduced that the antennas characteristics do not change too much. We then chose to realize the structure at the second iteration as illustrated in Figure9.Figure 9
Realized antenna picture.Figure10 shows a comparison between simulated and measured return loss.Figure 10
Comparison between simulated and measured antenna return loss.The simulated and measured return losses show good agreement. The slight difference is generally related to connector use which is not considered during simulation. Table2 gives a numerical comparison of the validated bands.Table 2
Comparison between simulated and measured antenna return losses.
Bands Simulation Measurement Band 1 [2.25–2.8] GHz [2.35–2.86] GHz Band 2 [5.5–6] GHz [5.48–6.16] GHzThe −10 dB measured return loss bandwidths (19.5% and 11.7% at the low and high resonance frequencies, resp.) cover ISM 2.4 GHz (2.4–2.5 GHz) and 5.8 GHz (5.725–5.875 GHz) bands.Figure11 presents the XZ (E-plane) and YZ (H-plane) planes radiation pattern at frequencies 2.5 GHz (a and c) and 5.8 GHz (b and d).Figure 11
Measured radiation pattern of the realized antenna at 2.5 GHz (XZ plane (a) and YZ plane (c)) and 5.8 GHz (XZ plane (b) and YZ plane (d)).
(a) (b) (c) (d)The measured radiation at 2.5 GHz is distributed over all directions but presents a maximum through theZ-axis at 180° while it is concentrated in the upper part of the XZ plane at 5.8 GHz. In the YZ plane, the antenna radiates in all directions except around 180° through the Z-axis at both 2.5 GHz and 5.8 GHz.We notice that there is considerable radiation attenuation around 180° relative to the antenna back in theYZ plane and at 5.8 GHz in the XZ plane. After analysis we deduced that this attenuation is related to mechanical support of measurement that reflects the energy received from the horn antenna when the receiving antenna is turned back.The achieved antenna presents good characteristics that are suitable for wireless power transmission (WPT) applications. The size is small (60 × 30 mm2). The dual ISM bands covered by the antenna in this work are commonly used for WPT. The radiation pattern is almost omnidirectional in both bands, which permits harvesting a maximum of energy. The antenna gain could be improved by several techniques.In [28], authors designed an antenna array (4 elements) with multiple superstrates to improve the Sierpiński triangle antenna gain. The antenna operates at 860 MHz for RFID application. This method could be applied to our structure in order to enhance the gain and then the rectenna efficiency.Table3 compares the achieved antenna to other planar antennas used for rectenna application.Table 3
Performance comparison between the proposed antenna and other compact antennas.
Published literature versus proposed antenna Antenna size (mm2) Bands (GHz) Gain (dBi) This work 60 × 30 2.4 2.2 5.8 5.8 Reference [13] 45 × 30 5.2 4.4 5.8 6.6 Reference [14] 45 × 45 1.8 3.9 Reference [15] 135 × 93 2.4 10


## 4. Conclusion

A new planar multiband fractal antenna based on Sierpiński triangle is presented. In the first Sierpiński triangle, three iterations are designed and studied. The second iteration structure was printed over an FR4 substrate of 60 × 30 mm2 as dimension, a relative permittivity equal to 4.4, 1.6 mm of thickness, and 0.025 of loss tangent. The measurements present good performance at ISM 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz. The structure is simple to fabricate, low cost, and easy to associate with integrated circuits. These characteristics are suitable for wireless power transmission applications.



---

*Source: 2084747-2018-03-14.xml*