# Mineralogy Characteristic Study and Exploration on the Valuable Metals Enrichment of Coal Fly Ash

Authors: Tao Chen; Bo Yan; Li-li Li; Zi-Ang Yan; Jun Wang; Xian-ming Xiao
Journal: Advances in Polymer Technology
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

The separation and enrichment can be targeted to enrich in fly ash and reduce the cost of leaching and recovering of fly ash. Regarding their different properties, the single-component separation was used to obtain uncompleted burned carbon, glass microbeads, minerals, and other characteristic components from the ash. Also, the mineral composition of each component was analyzed by electron microscopy. The metal minerals were mainly concentrated in the mineral components. Besides, the electron probe microanalysis shows that the Pt content in the minerals of fly ash was significantly correlated with the metal contents of Ni and Cu. After the obtainment of the characteristics of fly ash metal enrichment, the heavy minerals with Cu, Ni, Pt, Pd, and other target metal elements were enriched by gravity separation and flotation. The enrichment coefficients of Cu, Ni, Pt, and Pd were 1.45, 1.33, 1.90, and 1.60, respectively, and the recovery rates were 77%, 81%, 97%, and 88%, respectively. Since the yield of heavy minerals obtained by separation was 62.24%, it indicated the physical separation method could significantly reduce the cost of leaching and recovering of fly ash metal resources.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The amount of fly ash produced is 5%–20% of the total mass of coal used. In 2017, the total amount of fly ash was 686 million tons in China. In addition to a large amount of carbon and hydrogen, coal also contains a variety of metals [1, 2]. Its type is mainly related to coal strata. Through the analysis of the metal elements of different ore deposits, it is found that Ca, Ge, Au, Pt, Sc, and other rare metal resources are contained in coal [3]. These metal elements enriched in fly ash can reach 4–10 times of the coal [4]. According to Wang et al. [3], the content of Au and Ga in fly ash was 1 μg/g and 50 μg/g, respectively, which has a certain comprehensive recovery value. However, the conventional utilization rate of fly ash was less than 50% [5], and utilized fly ash was still stored in the ash yard of power plants. Furthermore, fly ash also contains a variety of heavy metals. Izquierdo and Querol [6] and others have compared the leaching characteristics of more than 90 kinds of fly ash. It is found that these heavy metals in fly ash including Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, Sn, Zn. As will be leached and transferred to the environment [7, 8, 9, 10], thus causing severe environmental pollution [11, 12] when the environmental pH value decreases.Metals in fly ash are mostly scattered elements associated with deposits, which have low contents and recovery values [13, 14], and there are up to 316 minerals in fly ash [15]. The metals could be recovered by leaching process effectively [16, 17]. Besides, heavy metal elements are transferred to the leachate [18]; thereby, the threat of the heavy metal pollution could be educed or even eliminated [19]. Acid was often used as leaching agent in the recovery of metals. However, most of the minerals of the ash were alkaline substances [20, 21]. The alkaline material consumes a large amount of acid, leading to the high cost of leaching reagents. Therefore, the enrichment of metals and the removal of the alkaline substances should be carried before the leaching process. The enrichment could be realized by the mineral separation method [22], and the recovery value of rare metals would be promoted. However, the separation and enrichment of characteristic minerals for the ash are insufficient [23]. Fly ash mainly includes four components such as vitreous, magnetic material, hollow microbeads, and uncompleted burned carbon [15], and different components has significant differences of the minerals composition [1]. Thus, it is imperative to study the metals distribution characteristics and to study the separation technology for the enrichment of the rare metals in fly ash, aiming to provide some empirical basis for the comprehensive recovery of rare and precious metals from the fly ash.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Sampling Procedure and Sample Preparation

The Late Paleozoic coal seams in western Guizhou often contain platinum group elements [1], which have excellent research value of geoscience and comprehensive recovery. All samples were air dried at ambient temperature, lightly crushed, and followed by screening with a 2-mm nylon sieve to remove coarse debris. After that, all the sieved samples were further mechanically pulverized and homogenized adequately so that all particles could pass through a 0.149-mm nylon sieve for further chemical analysis. Shortly after processing, one representative composite tailing sample was prepared by thoroughly mixing all finely grounded ash samples employing the coning and quartering method to conduct the following tests.


### 2.2. Sorting Methods

The ball mill used in the flotation test is XMQ240-90 cone ball mill. The flotation equipment is XFG-500 and XFG-1000 hanging flotation machine, and its impeller speed is 1500 r/min. The pulp concentration for the flotation is 5%, the collector is diesel, and the foaming agent is No. 2 oil. The gravity water selecting was processed with a beaker, the slurry concentration was 5%, and aeration was carried out for 30 minutes using an aeration head. After standing for 2 hours, the upper substance and the bottom mud were taken, respectively. When shaker was used for specific gravity separation, the slurry concentration was 10%, and the shaker frequency was 80 s/min.


### 2.3. Analysis Methods

An aliquot (0.5 g) of coal fly ash samples was wet-digested in by microwave digestion equipment (WX-8000, EU microwave chemistry technology Co., Ltd.) under Method 3051A (US EPA, 2007). The metal concentrations were determined using flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (FAAS, Hitachi ZA3000, Japan). For geochemical analysis, primary (Ca, Fe, Al, Mg, Si, Ca, and Mn) elements were determined by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF, Philips PW1480, America) after the loss on ignition (LOI) measurement at 1100°C. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector (S-4800, Hitachi, Japan) was operated for the surface mineralogical investigation. The electron probe (JXA8100, JEOL, Japan) was used for the analysis of the micro-area distribution characteristics of metals. The analysis for the specific gravity and the specific surface was carried with the true density tester (G-DenPyc2900, Beijing) and the surface area and porosity analyzer (micromeritics, USA).


## 2.1. Sampling Procedure and Sample Preparation

The Late Paleozoic coal seams in western Guizhou often contain platinum group elements [1], which have excellent research value of geoscience and comprehensive recovery. All samples were air dried at ambient temperature, lightly crushed, and followed by screening with a 2-mm nylon sieve to remove coarse debris. After that, all the sieved samples were further mechanically pulverized and homogenized adequately so that all particles could pass through a 0.149-mm nylon sieve for further chemical analysis. Shortly after processing, one representative composite tailing sample was prepared by thoroughly mixing all finely grounded ash samples employing the coning and quartering method to conduct the following tests.


## 2.2. Sorting Methods

The ball mill used in the flotation test is XMQ240-90 cone ball mill. The flotation equipment is XFG-500 and XFG-1000 hanging flotation machine, and its impeller speed is 1500 r/min. The pulp concentration for the flotation is 5%, the collector is diesel, and the foaming agent is No. 2 oil. The gravity water selecting was processed with a beaker, the slurry concentration was 5%, and aeration was carried out for 30 minutes using an aeration head. After standing for 2 hours, the upper substance and the bottom mud were taken, respectively. When shaker was used for specific gravity separation, the slurry concentration was 10%, and the shaker frequency was 80 s/min.


## 2.3. Analysis Methods

An aliquot (0.5 g) of coal fly ash samples was wet-digested in by microwave digestion equipment (WX-8000, EU microwave chemistry technology Co., Ltd.) under Method 3051A (US EPA, 2007). The metal concentrations were determined using flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (FAAS, Hitachi ZA3000, Japan). For geochemical analysis, primary (Ca, Fe, Al, Mg, Si, Ca, and Mn) elements were determined by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF, Philips PW1480, America) after the loss on ignition (LOI) measurement at 1100°C. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector (S-4800, Hitachi, Japan) was operated for the surface mineralogical investigation. The electron probe (JXA8100, JEOL, Japan) was used for the analysis of the micro-area distribution characteristics of metals. The analysis for the specific gravity and the specific surface was carried with the true density tester (G-DenPyc2900, Beijing) and the surface area and porosity analyzer (micromeritics, USA).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Physicochemical Properties of Fly Ash

As shown in Table1, the specific gravity of fly ash is 1.85 g/cm3, and the specific surface area is 3180 cm2/g respectively. The Ca content in fly ash is 11%, and it is the low calcium content ash. The ratio of [(CaO + MgO)/(SiO2 + Al2O3)] in fly ash is 0.24; thus, the ash belongs to acid ash and has typical characteristics of ultrabasic rock deposits [24]. The content of Pt and Pd in fly ash is 0.10 g/t and 0.05 g/t, respectively. The typical geological characteristics of the ash can be further proved with the discovery of Pt group elements [3]. Besides the Pt group elements, the content of Cu and Ni can reach 0.15%. The Fe content in this sample can reach 16%. These metals have a high recovery value. However, the cost for the direct leaching recovery would be higher than recycled products for the high content of alkaline substances such as Ca and Mg [25]. It is a necessity to study the metal distribution characteristics.Table 1
Elemental analysis of fly ash.
SiO2%
Al2O3%
CaO%
MgO%
S%
Fe%
Zn%
42.18
3.44
11.07
0.11
0.61
16.39
0.15
As g/t
Hg g/t
Pb g/t
Ag g/t
Rb g/t
Cr g/t
Cd g/t
225.27
0.59
382.41
3.17
29.42
77.92
Nd
Cu g/t
Mn g/t
Ni g/t
Ga g/t
Pt g/t
Pd g/t
LOI%
1050.52
66.83
533.19
1.38
0.10
0.05
9.14


### 3.2. Microscopic Characteristics of Fly Ash Components

The micromorphology of fly ash samples under the secondary electron and secondary electron + back scattering states of scanning electron microscopy was shown in Figure1. It can be seen that fly ash contains three components: spherical hollow microbeads (Figure 1(a)), uncompleted burned carbon (Figure 1(a)), and minerals (Figure 1(b)). Through backscattering, it can be seen that some metallic minerals are contained in the minerals. The physical and chemical properties of the three components are quite different and easy to separate [23]. Thus, the single-component sorting tests will first proceed. The sorting recovery rates for the single component would not be recorded, because the primary purpose of mono-component separation tests was to obtain the single component as pure as possible.Figure 1
Photomicrograph and energy spectrum of the fly ash and its single components.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)The uncompleted burned carbon was obtained by the chosen flotation. Its electron microscope images were shown in Figures1(c) and 1(d). It can be seen that the space between multi-particles of the uncompleted burned carbon is small, the particles are porous materials, and the BSE analysis does not contain the metal substance. Since the composition of conductive plastic for EDS is organic C, the energy spectrum analysis of the uncompleted burned carbon was not performed.The uncompleted burned carbon was removed from fly ash by flotation firstly; the obtained flotation tailings were separated by gravity sedimentation. After three times of gravity separation, the materials still floating on the water surface were dehydrated and dried to obtain hollow microbeads. Figure1(e) shows the microscopic characteristics of hollow microbeads. It can be seen that the microbeads are all fine particles, and are mostly gathered together to form larger particles. The EDS results were shown in Figures 1(g) and 1(h). It can be seen that the hollow microsphere were mostly alumino-silicate materials or silicon oxide, and most of the materials are glass phases, that is, amorphous phases. Metal minerals were not found on hollow microbeads under BSE.The residues after sorting of the hollow microbeads were defined as the mineral in the fly ash; the minerals were not sorted with its unique physical properties. Thus, its composition would be complicated, and the mineralogy flakes for the minerals were prepared for the comprehensive microscopic observation (Figure1(f)). It can be seen that the minerals include nonmetallic minerals and metallic minerals. The EDS (Figures 1(i) and 1(j)) showed that the minerals were mainly composed of iron-bearing minerals. Since pyrite is easier to be found in BSE electron microscopy analysis, the energy spectrum data mainly show pyrite minerals.


### 3.3. Probe Analysis for the Minerals of the Fly Ash

Probe analysis for the minerals of the fly ash was shown in Figure2 and the chemical composition of the probe point was shown in Table 2. It can be seen that the particle size of the minerals was about 10 μm, and the components of the minerals were abundant. Five feature point probe analyses were chosen for the discussion (Table 2). As the results of the probe, it can be found that the probe point 1 was the sphalerite, probe points 2 and 4 were the SiO2, and probe points 3 and 5 were some silicate ores with iron oxide ore. Pt had been detected within the probe points 3 and 5, also, the Ni and Cu had been detected.Figure 2
Electron probe photographs of the minerals.Table 2
Chemical composition of the electron probe points for the minerals (%).
Point
1
2
3
4
5
MgO
1.148
0.076
0.003
0.004
6.19
K2O
0.191
0.078
0.055
0.009
0.043
SiO2
1.611
90.415
0.013
97.649
22.38
Cr2O3
0.346
0.042
0.09
0.137
/
Al2O3
0.657
0.263
0.01
0.055
19.55
CaO
0.072
0.04
30.11
0.014
/
MnO
/
/
/
0.005
0.58
PbO
1.449
0.228
0.23
0.036
0.55
SO3
23.37
0.481
33.406
0.102
0.15
CuO
0.226
0.012
0.59
/
0.53
NiO
/
/
1.12
/
0.67
Rb2O
/
/
/
/
/
ZnO
55.569
0.341
0.5838
1.036
/
Na2O
2.001
0.022
—
0.006
0.01
FeO
4.547
0.349
30.75
0.376
46.932
PtO2
/
/
0.58
/
0.41
Total
91.187
92.347
97.5408
99.429
97.995The correlation analysis of element concentration was shown in Table3. It can be seen from the analysis that Pt is significantly correlated with Ni and Cu, and the correlation coefficients are 0.99 and 0.94, respectively. In addition, Pt is poorly correlated with major ore-forming elements such as Ca, Al, and Si. It can be concluded that Pt in fly ash is mainly associated with metal elements such as Ni and Cu.Table 3
Component correlation analysis.
SiO2
Al2O3
CaO
MnO
PbO
SO3
CuO
NiO
ZnO
FeO
PtO2
SiO2
1.00
−0.24
−0.49
−0.23
−0.62
−0.77
−0.83
−0.62
−0.47
−0.59
−0.62
Al2O3
−0.24
1.00
−0.27
0.99∗∗
0.08
−0.40
0.51
0.32
−0.23
0.79
0.41
CaO
−0.49
−0.27
1.00
−0.25
−0.27
0.78
0.64
0.83
−0.25
0.37
0.77
MnO
−0.23
0.99∗∗
−0.25
1.00
0.05
−0.41
0.51
0.34
−0.26
0.80
0.42
PbO
−0.62
0.08
−0.27
0.05
1.00
0.37
0.13
−0.23
0.94∗
−0.04
−0.22
SO3
−0.77
−0.40
0.78
−0.41
0.37
1.00
0.54
0.52
0.42
0.14
0.46
CuO
−0.83
0.51
0.64
0.51
0.13
0.54
1.00
0.92∗
−0.10
0.91∗
0.94∗
NiO
−0.62
0.32
0.83
0.34
−0.23
0.52
0.92∗
1.00
−0.39
0.83
0.99∗∗
ZnO
−0.47
−0.23
−0.25
−0.26
0.94∗
0.42
−0.10
−0.39
1.00
−0.33
−0.40
FeO
−0.59
0.79
0.37
0.80
−0.04
0.14
0.91∗
0.83
−0.33
1.00
0.88
PtO2
−0.62
0.41
0.77
0.42
−0.22
0.46
0.94∗
0.99∗∗
−0.40
0.88
1.00
∗
∗Significantly correlated at 0.01 level (both sides), ∗Significantly correlated at 0.05 level (both sides).


### 3.4. Research on the Recovery of Valuable Elements

As the SEM analysis, metal minerals were not found out within the pure feature single component. With the electron probe analysis of the minerals, Pt element was found in the minerals. Furthermore, Pt was closely correlated with Ni and Cu. In order to recover the Pt from the fly ash, the separation to enrich Pt was tested; the separation process was shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Physical selection test procedure for the coal fly ash.The yield and also the metal grade of the separation were shown in Table4. The total recoveries of the analyzed indicators were 86%–130% of the original pulverized coal ash, and the analytical results were ideal. The metals such as Cu, Ni, Pt, and Pd in heavy minerals were enriched by 1.45, 1.33, 1.90, and 1.60 times, and the recovery rates of target elements such as Cu, Ni, Pt, and Pd in heavy minerals were 77%, 81%, 97%, and 88%, respectively. The uncompleted burned carbon, hollow microbeads, and other products obtained by separation could be recycled again. It explained that the use of the separation process route could not only enrich the elements of Cu, Ni, Pt, and Pd in fly ash but also realize the comprehensive utilization of fly ash.Table 4
Metal recovery tests of the fly ash.
Yield%
Fe%
SiO2%
Zn%
Pb g/t
Ag g/t
Cu g/t
Ni g/t
Ga g/t
Pt g/t
Pd g/t
Coal fly ash
100
16.39
42.18
0.15
382.41
3.17
1050.52
533.19
1.38
0.1
0.05
Unburned carbon
4.55
0.55
12.31
0.01
15.23
nd
15.37
8.41
0.18
nd
nd
Hollow microbeads
1.72
1.54
61.53
0.05
20.07
0.52
3.71
0.58
0.35
nd
nd
Lightweight minerals
31.49
10.55
50.19
0.16
255.41
1.09
886.42
317.66
1.43
0.01
0.02
Heavy quality minerals
62.24
22.31
39.52
0.21
439.25
3.86
1528.62
710.38
2.13
0.19
0.08
Fe
SiO2
Zn
Pb
Ag
Cu
Ni
Ga
Pt
Pd
Unburned carbon
%
0.14
1.33
0.25
0.20
0.00
0.06
0.07
0.46
0.00
0.00
Hollow microbeads
%
0.15
2.52
0.47
0.10
0.32
0.01
0.00
0.34
0.00
0.00
Lightweight minerals
%
19.25
37.61
27.62
22.67
12.46
22.67
18.44
25.15
2.59
11.23
Heavy quality minerals
%
80.45
58.54
71.66
77.04
87.21
77.27
81.49
74.05
97.41
88.77
Total recovery rate
%
105.30
99.62
121.60
92.79
86.90
117.21
101.76
129.73
121.41
112.18


## 3.1. Physicochemical Properties of Fly Ash

As shown in Table1, the specific gravity of fly ash is 1.85 g/cm3, and the specific surface area is 3180 cm2/g respectively. The Ca content in fly ash is 11%, and it is the low calcium content ash. The ratio of [(CaO + MgO)/(SiO2 + Al2O3)] in fly ash is 0.24; thus, the ash belongs to acid ash and has typical characteristics of ultrabasic rock deposits [24]. The content of Pt and Pd in fly ash is 0.10 g/t and 0.05 g/t, respectively. The typical geological characteristics of the ash can be further proved with the discovery of Pt group elements [3]. Besides the Pt group elements, the content of Cu and Ni can reach 0.15%. The Fe content in this sample can reach 16%. These metals have a high recovery value. However, the cost for the direct leaching recovery would be higher than recycled products for the high content of alkaline substances such as Ca and Mg [25]. It is a necessity to study the metal distribution characteristics.Table 1
Elemental analysis of fly ash.
SiO2%
Al2O3%
CaO%
MgO%
S%
Fe%
Zn%
42.18
3.44
11.07
0.11
0.61
16.39
0.15
As g/t
Hg g/t
Pb g/t
Ag g/t
Rb g/t
Cr g/t
Cd g/t
225.27
0.59
382.41
3.17
29.42
77.92
Nd
Cu g/t
Mn g/t
Ni g/t
Ga g/t
Pt g/t
Pd g/t
LOI%
1050.52
66.83
533.19
1.38
0.10
0.05
9.14


## 3.2. Microscopic Characteristics of Fly Ash Components

The micromorphology of fly ash samples under the secondary electron and secondary electron + back scattering states of scanning electron microscopy was shown in Figure1. It can be seen that fly ash contains three components: spherical hollow microbeads (Figure 1(a)), uncompleted burned carbon (Figure 1(a)), and minerals (Figure 1(b)). Through backscattering, it can be seen that some metallic minerals are contained in the minerals. The physical and chemical properties of the three components are quite different and easy to separate [23]. Thus, the single-component sorting tests will first proceed. The sorting recovery rates for the single component would not be recorded, because the primary purpose of mono-component separation tests was to obtain the single component as pure as possible.Figure 1
Photomicrograph and energy spectrum of the fly ash and its single components.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)The uncompleted burned carbon was obtained by the chosen flotation. Its electron microscope images were shown in Figures1(c) and 1(d). It can be seen that the space between multi-particles of the uncompleted burned carbon is small, the particles are porous materials, and the BSE analysis does not contain the metal substance. Since the composition of conductive plastic for EDS is organic C, the energy spectrum analysis of the uncompleted burned carbon was not performed.The uncompleted burned carbon was removed from fly ash by flotation firstly; the obtained flotation tailings were separated by gravity sedimentation. After three times of gravity separation, the materials still floating on the water surface were dehydrated and dried to obtain hollow microbeads. Figure1(e) shows the microscopic characteristics of hollow microbeads. It can be seen that the microbeads are all fine particles, and are mostly gathered together to form larger particles. The EDS results were shown in Figures 1(g) and 1(h). It can be seen that the hollow microsphere were mostly alumino-silicate materials or silicon oxide, and most of the materials are glass phases, that is, amorphous phases. Metal minerals were not found on hollow microbeads under BSE.The residues after sorting of the hollow microbeads were defined as the mineral in the fly ash; the minerals were not sorted with its unique physical properties. Thus, its composition would be complicated, and the mineralogy flakes for the minerals were prepared for the comprehensive microscopic observation (Figure1(f)). It can be seen that the minerals include nonmetallic minerals and metallic minerals. The EDS (Figures 1(i) and 1(j)) showed that the minerals were mainly composed of iron-bearing minerals. Since pyrite is easier to be found in BSE electron microscopy analysis, the energy spectrum data mainly show pyrite minerals.


## 3.3. Probe Analysis for the Minerals of the Fly Ash

Probe analysis for the minerals of the fly ash was shown in Figure2 and the chemical composition of the probe point was shown in Table 2. It can be seen that the particle size of the minerals was about 10 μm, and the components of the minerals were abundant. Five feature point probe analyses were chosen for the discussion (Table 2). As the results of the probe, it can be found that the probe point 1 was the sphalerite, probe points 2 and 4 were the SiO2, and probe points 3 and 5 were some silicate ores with iron oxide ore. Pt had been detected within the probe points 3 and 5, also, the Ni and Cu had been detected.Figure 2
Electron probe photographs of the minerals.Table 2
Chemical composition of the electron probe points for the minerals (%).
Point
1
2
3
4
5
MgO
1.148
0.076
0.003
0.004
6.19
K2O
0.191
0.078
0.055
0.009
0.043
SiO2
1.611
90.415
0.013
97.649
22.38
Cr2O3
0.346
0.042
0.09
0.137
/
Al2O3
0.657
0.263
0.01
0.055
19.55
CaO
0.072
0.04
30.11
0.014
/
MnO
/
/
/
0.005
0.58
PbO
1.449
0.228
0.23
0.036
0.55
SO3
23.37
0.481
33.406
0.102
0.15
CuO
0.226
0.012
0.59
/
0.53
NiO
/
/
1.12
/
0.67
Rb2O
/
/
/
/
/
ZnO
55.569
0.341
0.5838
1.036
/
Na2O
2.001
0.022
—
0.006
0.01
FeO
4.547
0.349
30.75
0.376
46.932
PtO2
/
/
0.58
/
0.41
Total
91.187
92.347
97.5408
99.429
97.995The correlation analysis of element concentration was shown in Table3. It can be seen from the analysis that Pt is significantly correlated with Ni and Cu, and the correlation coefficients are 0.99 and 0.94, respectively. In addition, Pt is poorly correlated with major ore-forming elements such as Ca, Al, and Si. It can be concluded that Pt in fly ash is mainly associated with metal elements such as Ni and Cu.Table 3
Component correlation analysis.
SiO2
Al2O3
CaO
MnO
PbO
SO3
CuO
NiO
ZnO
FeO
PtO2
SiO2
1.00
−0.24
−0.49
−0.23
−0.62
−0.77
−0.83
−0.62
−0.47
−0.59
−0.62
Al2O3
−0.24
1.00
−0.27
0.99∗∗
0.08
−0.40
0.51
0.32
−0.23
0.79
0.41
CaO
−0.49
−0.27
1.00
−0.25
−0.27
0.78
0.64
0.83
−0.25
0.37
0.77
MnO
−0.23
0.99∗∗
−0.25
1.00
0.05
−0.41
0.51
0.34
−0.26
0.80
0.42
PbO
−0.62
0.08
−0.27
0.05
1.00
0.37
0.13
−0.23
0.94∗
−0.04
−0.22
SO3
−0.77
−0.40
0.78
−0.41
0.37
1.00
0.54
0.52
0.42
0.14
0.46
CuO
−0.83
0.51
0.64
0.51
0.13
0.54
1.00
0.92∗
−0.10
0.91∗
0.94∗
NiO
−0.62
0.32
0.83
0.34
−0.23
0.52
0.92∗
1.00
−0.39
0.83
0.99∗∗
ZnO
−0.47
−0.23
−0.25
−0.26
0.94∗
0.42
−0.10
−0.39
1.00
−0.33
−0.40
FeO
−0.59
0.79
0.37
0.80
−0.04
0.14
0.91∗
0.83
−0.33
1.00
0.88
PtO2
−0.62
0.41
0.77
0.42
−0.22
0.46
0.94∗
0.99∗∗
−0.40
0.88
1.00
∗
∗Significantly correlated at 0.01 level (both sides), ∗Significantly correlated at 0.05 level (both sides).


## 3.4. Research on the Recovery of Valuable Elements

As the SEM analysis, metal minerals were not found out within the pure feature single component. With the electron probe analysis of the minerals, Pt element was found in the minerals. Furthermore, Pt was closely correlated with Ni and Cu. In order to recover the Pt from the fly ash, the separation to enrich Pt was tested; the separation process was shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Physical selection test procedure for the coal fly ash.The yield and also the metal grade of the separation were shown in Table4. The total recoveries of the analyzed indicators were 86%–130% of the original pulverized coal ash, and the analytical results were ideal. The metals such as Cu, Ni, Pt, and Pd in heavy minerals were enriched by 1.45, 1.33, 1.90, and 1.60 times, and the recovery rates of target elements such as Cu, Ni, Pt, and Pd in heavy minerals were 77%, 81%, 97%, and 88%, respectively. The uncompleted burned carbon, hollow microbeads, and other products obtained by separation could be recycled again. It explained that the use of the separation process route could not only enrich the elements of Cu, Ni, Pt, and Pd in fly ash but also realize the comprehensive utilization of fly ash.Table 4
Metal recovery tests of the fly ash.
Yield%
Fe%
SiO2%
Zn%
Pb g/t
Ag g/t
Cu g/t
Ni g/t
Ga g/t
Pt g/t
Pd g/t
Coal fly ash
100
16.39
42.18
0.15
382.41
3.17
1050.52
533.19
1.38
0.1
0.05
Unburned carbon
4.55
0.55
12.31
0.01
15.23
nd
15.37
8.41
0.18
nd
nd
Hollow microbeads
1.72
1.54
61.53
0.05
20.07
0.52
3.71
0.58
0.35
nd
nd
Lightweight minerals
31.49
10.55
50.19
0.16
255.41
1.09
886.42
317.66
1.43
0.01
0.02
Heavy quality minerals
62.24
22.31
39.52
0.21
439.25
3.86
1528.62
710.38
2.13
0.19
0.08
Fe
SiO2
Zn
Pb
Ag
Cu
Ni
Ga
Pt
Pd
Unburned carbon
%
0.14
1.33
0.25
0.20
0.00
0.06
0.07
0.46
0.00
0.00
Hollow microbeads
%
0.15
2.52
0.47
0.10
0.32
0.01
0.00
0.34
0.00
0.00
Lightweight minerals
%
19.25
37.61
27.62
22.67
12.46
22.67
18.44
25.15
2.59
11.23
Heavy quality minerals
%
80.45
58.54
71.66
77.04
87.21
77.27
81.49
74.05
97.41
88.77
Total recovery rate
%
105.30
99.62
121.60
92.79
86.90
117.21
101.76
129.73
121.41
112.18


## 4. Conclusions

Pt was detected within the coal fly ash which was the coal seams in Western Guizhou Province. The uncompleted burned carbon and glass microbeads can be sorted with the single component separation process. The mineralogical analysis shows that uncompleted burned carbon was porous substances and glass microbeads were mainly the amorphous phase of silicate. Furthermore, the minerals could be concentrated with the sorting of the uncompleted burned carbon and also the glass microbeads. Pt element was found in the minerals, and Pt was closely correlated with Ni and Cu with the analysis of electron microprobe. Heavy minerals with Cu, Ni, Pt, Pd and other metals could be separated with flotation and the gravity separation from the coal fly ash, the enrichment coefficients are 1.45, 1.33, 1.90 and 1.60 times, respectively, and the recovery rates are 77%, 81%, 97% and 88%, respectively. It shows that the elements such as Cu, Ni, Pt and Pd could be concentrated by the separation route, thus, the comprehensive utilization of fly ash could be realized.



---

*Source: 1839450-2019-10-27.xml*