# Smart Integrated Sensor for Multiple Detections of Glucose and L-Lactate Using On-Chip Electrochemical System

Authors: Tomoyuki Yamazaki; Takaaki Ikeda; Byounghyun Lim; Koichi Okumura; Makoto Ishida; Kazuaki Sawada
Journal: Journal of Sensors
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

Multiple sensor electrodes, a supplementary electrode, a reference electrode, and signal-processing circuits were integrated on a single chip to develop a chip-shaped electrochemical sensing system. L-lactate and glucose were measured using on-chip working electrodes modified by polyion complex to immobilize lactate oxidase and glucose oxidase, respectively. Cyclic voltammetry measurements were conducted using an on-chip potentiostat. Selective and quantitative detection of glucose and L-lactate and the interference behavior were studied. Hydrogen peroxide generated by enzymatic reactions was detected by an increase in anodic oxidation current. Reaction currents at +0.7 V versus Ag/AgCl were used to obtain calibration plots. The measured dynamic ranges for L-lactate and glucose were 0.2–1.0 mM and 2.0–8.0 mM, respectively. The sensitivities were 65 nA/mM and 15 nA/mM, respectively, using a working electrode of 0.5 mm2. The 3σ detection limit was 0.19 mM and 1.1 mM, respectively. We have achieved multiple biomaterial detections on a circuit-equipped single chip. This integrated electrochemical sensor chip could be the best candidate for realizing point-of-care testing due to its portability and potential for mass production.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Electrochemical sensors have attracted attention in recent decades because they have been used in clinical inspection, environmental assessment, and battery technology. Generally, biosensors need fewer chemicals and a smaller sample volume and require few pretreatments. In addition, because of their selectivity and sensitivity, biosensors are of great importance for future health checkups. Many studies have examined clinical diagnosis, including detection of L-lactate [1–4], detection of glucose [5–7], and detection of other biomaterials or combinations of biomaterials [8–10].Some reports on miniaturizing the entire sensing system have appeared recently [11]. With rising demands for personal care, portable, reliable, and fast biosensors are desired. Bulky electrochemical instruments should be miniaturized for future on-site measurement applications. To fulfill these requirements, electrochemical sensors using complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) circuits could be the best candidate [12–15]. The entire system can be integrated into a single chip using a standard CMOS technique and a few electrode fabrication processes, which is promising because of the potential for mass production. Our objective is to fabricate a compact intelligent sensor chip to realize a portable and reliable sensing system that combines CMOS technology and electrochemical sensors.Electrochemical sensors with CMOS circuits were reported recently. Levine et al. incorporated CMOS circuits into an electrochemical sensor [16] to detect DNA hybridization. Our group also demonstrated a CMOS-integrated electrochemical sensor [17]. However, an external reference electrode (RE) was used in both cases. To respond to the demand for a compact electrochemical measurement system suitable for point-of-care testing, a more integrated sensing system is needed.In this paper, we have successfully developed an electrochemical sensing system that integrates multiple working electrodes (WEs), a counter electrode (CE), an RE, and signal-processing circuits. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first electrochemical sensing chip in which those components required for electrochemical measurements are integrated. One future application of the chip is point-of-care testing: quick, simple checkups at patients’ bedside. L-lactate and glucose were chosen as example materials to demonstrate the future application of this biosensor chip.


## 2. Device Fabrication

The device was designed and fabricated at the Toyohashi University of Technology (Toyohashi Tech) using CMOS 5.0μm technology. The fabrication process began with an n-type silicon wafer. First, CMOS circuits were fabricated on the wafer in a clean room by oxidation, ion implantation, and photolithography. Then a platinum layer was sputtered, followed by titanium sputtering, using RF sputtering equipment. The titanium layer was used as an adhesive layer. The titanium and platinum layers were 0.05 μm and 0.2 μm thick, respectively. Electrodes were patterned using a lift-off method. Finally, all the chip surfaces except the electrodes were covered with a parylene layer to protect the circuits and wiring patterns from the solution under investigation.A diced 5.0 mm square chip is shown in Figure1, and a cross-sectional image of the chip is shown in Figure 2. There are four WEs, a CE, and an RE. Each WE is 710 μm square. In this study, two WEs were used. Operational amplifiers (OPAMPs) are aligned along the right side and the bottom side of the chip. All OPAMP terminals were connected to pads so that these OPAMPs could be interlinked by wiring to make a potentiostat. Chip fabrication took 82 operations in total, and 12 masks were used.Figure 1
Top view of fabricated chip. Working electrodes (WEs), counter electrode (CE), reference electrode (RE), and operational amplifiers (OPAMPs) are integrated.Figure 2
Cross-sectional image of the sensor chip. TEOS means tetraethoxysilane.The chip was fixed in an 80-pin package using silver paste. The pads and package were connected through 20-μm-diameter gold wires. The wires were encapsulated with silicone adhesive (MPMJ TSE387-W) to avoid unwanted contacts and create a sample well of about 70 μL. The surface of the chip was cleaned [18] using piranha solution (H2SO4 : H2O2 = 3 : 1), and electrochemical cleaning of potential −3.0 V was applied to each electrode against an external platinum electrode for 30 s. Then, Ag/AgCl ink (BAS 011464) was dropped manually by a needle on the RE position and dried (100°C, 1 h) to form an RE. Finally, WEs were modified with enzymes. The package and chip with sample solution are shown in Figure 3.Figure 3
Top view of the packaged chip.


## 3. Experimental

### 3.1. Chemical Reagents

All solutions were prepared using analytical reagent grade chemicals and MilliQ water. Lactate oxidase (LOD, EC 232-841-6, 42.8 U mg−1) from the Pediococcusspecies, glucose oxidase (GOD, EC 232-601-0, 153.1 U mg−1) from Aspergillus niger, and poly-L-lysine hydrobromide (molecular weight ≤ 150,000) were purchased from Sigma. Poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (molecular weight ~70,000) was purchased from Aldrich. Lithium L-lactate was purchased from Fluka, and D(+)-glucose was obtained from Kishida Chemical.


### 3.2. Enzyme Immobilization on Electrodes

First, the surfaces of the WEs were cleaned electrochemically. In the process of cleaning, a potential of −3.0 V was applied to each electrode for 30 s versus an external platinum electrode using an electrochemical analyzer (BAS CV-50 W). Surface cleanliness was confirmed by taking the cyclic voltammetry (CV) of 10.0 mM K3[Fe(CN)6]/0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PB, Na2HPO4: NaH2PO4 = 1 : 1, pH = 6.58) with an external RE (BAS, RE-1B). Judging from obtained clear peaks of K3[Fe(CN)6] (not shown), unfavorable contamination and an oxidized layer on the electrode surface were considered to be removed by cleaning.Enzymes were immobilized using the polyion complex method [19–21]. Each chemical reagent was dissolved in 0.1 M PB. First, 0.7 μL of 0.1 mM poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) was dropped onto the electrodes. Then 0.7 μL of LOD solution (50 U mL−1) or 0.7 μL of GOD solution (4.0 mg mL−1) was dropped onto the electrode continuously. Finally, 0.7 μL of 0.05 mM poly-L-lysine hydrobromide was dropped. The solution was dried at room temperature for 12 h to immobilize the polyion compound on the electrode. When it was not in use, the chip was stored at −4°C in a refrigerator with a droplet of PB on it. Polyion complex layers are stable for about a month [20]. Generally speaking, a measurement system with LOD and a sensing electrode system can be affected by electrochemical interference substances including L-ascorbic acid and uric acid. But by filtering them with polyion layer, such interferences could be avoided [20].


## 3.1. Chemical Reagents

All solutions were prepared using analytical reagent grade chemicals and MilliQ water. Lactate oxidase (LOD, EC 232-841-6, 42.8 U mg−1) from the Pediococcusspecies, glucose oxidase (GOD, EC 232-601-0, 153.1 U mg−1) from Aspergillus niger, and poly-L-lysine hydrobromide (molecular weight ≤ 150,000) were purchased from Sigma. Poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (molecular weight ~70,000) was purchased from Aldrich. Lithium L-lactate was purchased from Fluka, and D(+)-glucose was obtained from Kishida Chemical.


## 3.2. Enzyme Immobilization on Electrodes

First, the surfaces of the WEs were cleaned electrochemically. In the process of cleaning, a potential of −3.0 V was applied to each electrode for 30 s versus an external platinum electrode using an electrochemical analyzer (BAS CV-50 W). Surface cleanliness was confirmed by taking the cyclic voltammetry (CV) of 10.0 mM K3[Fe(CN)6]/0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PB, Na2HPO4: NaH2PO4 = 1 : 1, pH = 6.58) with an external RE (BAS, RE-1B). Judging from obtained clear peaks of K3[Fe(CN)6] (not shown), unfavorable contamination and an oxidized layer on the electrode surface were considered to be removed by cleaning.Enzymes were immobilized using the polyion complex method [19–21]. Each chemical reagent was dissolved in 0.1 M PB. First, 0.7 μL of 0.1 mM poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) was dropped onto the electrodes. Then 0.7 μL of LOD solution (50 U mL−1) or 0.7 μL of GOD solution (4.0 mg mL−1) was dropped onto the electrode continuously. Finally, 0.7 μL of 0.05 mM poly-L-lysine hydrobromide was dropped. The solution was dried at room temperature for 12 h to immobilize the polyion compound on the electrode. When it was not in use, the chip was stored at −4°C in a refrigerator with a droplet of PB on it. Polyion complex layers are stable for about a month [20]. Generally speaking, a measurement system with LOD and a sensing electrode system can be affected by electrochemical interference substances including L-ascorbic acid and uric acid. But by filtering them with polyion layer, such interferences could be avoided [20].


## 4. Results and Discussion

### 4.1. Cyclic Voltammetry Using On-Chip Circuits

A schematic of the potentiostat, which consisted of two OPAMPs, is shown in Figure4. The equivalent circuit of the designed two-stage OPAMP is shown in Figure 5. The phase-compensation capacitance was designed to be 3.0 pF to drive a capacitive load of a few pF. The drive voltages of the OPAMPs were Vdd=+2.5 V and Vss=-2.5 V. The consumption current of the potentiostat during the measurement was 0.17 mA. All components except the readout resistance were included on the chip to avoid fluctuation in the resistance caused by heat from the OPAMPs.Figure 4
Schematic of electrochemical measurement system: potentiostat and electrodes.Figure 5
Equivalent circuit of designed operational amplifier.The details of this type of potentiostat are explained in the previous report [17]. Briefly, the input voltage (V1) was applied and swept from Vs to Ve and then back to Vs. The potential between the RE and the WE was controlled by maintaining the potential of the WE at ground level and making the potential of the RE follow V1. The CE works as a current source or sink. The reaction current at the WE was converted to voltage at OPAMP2, which was read out as Vout.


### 4.2. Selective Detection of L-Lactate and Glucose

L-lactate and glucose solutions were prepared by dissolution with 0.01 M PB solution and 0.9 wt% saline solution (PBS). LOD was immobilized on the leftmost WE (site A), and GOD was immobilized on the rightmost WE (site B), as shown in Figure3. The solution of 70 μL was dropped on the chip using a micropipette. With 0.5 mM L-lactate, a clear current increase was observed at site A, but the current appeared stable at site B, whereas with 5.0 mM glucose, a clear current increase was obtained at site B, but the signal was stable at site A. The CV results described above are shown in Figure 6. The mechanisms of L-lactate and glucose detection are shown in Figure 7. Both L-lactate and glucose were oxidized by the corresponding enzymes, LOD and GOD, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was generated. Since the enzymes were immobilized to the WE through a polyion complex, hydrogen peroxide was generated only near the WE. Consequently, when LOD was active, only site A was active, and vice versa.Difference in cyclic voltammetry curves between site A (lactate oxidase (LOD) was immobilized on working electrode) and site B (glucose-oxidase (GOD) was immobilized on working electrode) measuring (a) 0.5 mM L-lactate solution and (b) 5.0 mM glucose solution. Scan rate was 50 mV s−1.
(a)(b)Electron-transfer mechanism of (a) L-lactate and (b) glucose sensing.
(a)(b)Because both sites detect hydrogen peroxide, interference should be considered quantitatively. The crosstalk behavior was investigated by measuring the temporal behavior of the CV curve at site A after 10.0 mM of glucose solution was placed on the chip. A gradual increase in reaction current at 0.7 V was observed, as shown in Figure8. But the increase was less than 0.01 μA at the five-minute position. The error bar was calculated from the standard deviation value (n=3). Considering that the measurement was conducted within one minute of sample addition, the crosstalk effect due to H2O2 diffusion was negligibly small in this experiment. The interference at site B from H2O2 generated at site A was also negligible because of the same mechanism. Sites A and B were 1.4 mm apart. This experiment confirmed selective detection of L-lactate and glucose; the measurement of interference behavior will aid in the design of other integrated sensing systems.Figure 8
Crosstalk behavior: temporal measurement of reaction current at 0.7 V on site A while site B is active.


### 4.3. Calibration Curve Evaluation

CV curves were measured using various concentrations of L-lactate and glucose in PBS. Figures9 and 10 show the dependence of the shape of the curve on the concentration of L-lactate and glucose, respectively. At the LOD-modified WE, the reaction current increased when the L-lactate concentration increased. At the GOD-modified WE, the reaction current increased when the glucose concentration increased. Anodic currents at a potential of 0.7 V were used to create calibration plots of L-lactate and glucose (Figure 11 and Figure 12, resp.). The dynamic ranges were about 0.2–1.0 mM in L-lactate and 2.0–8.0 mM in glucose. The sensitivities were 65 nA/mM and 15 nA/mM, respectively using WE of 0.5 mm2. The 3σ detection limit was 0.19 mM and 1.1 mM, respectively.Figure 9
Cyclic voltammetry with various L-lactate concentrations. Scan rate was 50 mV s−1.Figure 10
Cyclic voltammetry with various glucose concentrations. Scan rate was 50 mV s−1.Figure 11
Calibration plot of L-lactate concentration at site A.Figure 12
Calibration plot of glucose concentration at site B.


## 4.1. Cyclic Voltammetry Using On-Chip Circuits

A schematic of the potentiostat, which consisted of two OPAMPs, is shown in Figure4. The equivalent circuit of the designed two-stage OPAMP is shown in Figure 5. The phase-compensation capacitance was designed to be 3.0 pF to drive a capacitive load of a few pF. The drive voltages of the OPAMPs were Vdd=+2.5 V and Vss=-2.5 V. The consumption current of the potentiostat during the measurement was 0.17 mA. All components except the readout resistance were included on the chip to avoid fluctuation in the resistance caused by heat from the OPAMPs.Figure 4
Schematic of electrochemical measurement system: potentiostat and electrodes.Figure 5
Equivalent circuit of designed operational amplifier.The details of this type of potentiostat are explained in the previous report [17]. Briefly, the input voltage (V1) was applied and swept from Vs to Ve and then back to Vs. The potential between the RE and the WE was controlled by maintaining the potential of the WE at ground level and making the potential of the RE follow V1. The CE works as a current source or sink. The reaction current at the WE was converted to voltage at OPAMP2, which was read out as Vout.


## 4.2. Selective Detection of L-Lactate and Glucose

L-lactate and glucose solutions were prepared by dissolution with 0.01 M PB solution and 0.9 wt% saline solution (PBS). LOD was immobilized on the leftmost WE (site A), and GOD was immobilized on the rightmost WE (site B), as shown in Figure3. The solution of 70 μL was dropped on the chip using a micropipette. With 0.5 mM L-lactate, a clear current increase was observed at site A, but the current appeared stable at site B, whereas with 5.0 mM glucose, a clear current increase was obtained at site B, but the signal was stable at site A. The CV results described above are shown in Figure 6. The mechanisms of L-lactate and glucose detection are shown in Figure 7. Both L-lactate and glucose were oxidized by the corresponding enzymes, LOD and GOD, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was generated. Since the enzymes were immobilized to the WE through a polyion complex, hydrogen peroxide was generated only near the WE. Consequently, when LOD was active, only site A was active, and vice versa.Difference in cyclic voltammetry curves between site A (lactate oxidase (LOD) was immobilized on working electrode) and site B (glucose-oxidase (GOD) was immobilized on working electrode) measuring (a) 0.5 mM L-lactate solution and (b) 5.0 mM glucose solution. Scan rate was 50 mV s−1.
(a)(b)Electron-transfer mechanism of (a) L-lactate and (b) glucose sensing.
(a)(b)Because both sites detect hydrogen peroxide, interference should be considered quantitatively. The crosstalk behavior was investigated by measuring the temporal behavior of the CV curve at site A after 10.0 mM of glucose solution was placed on the chip. A gradual increase in reaction current at 0.7 V was observed, as shown in Figure8. But the increase was less than 0.01 μA at the five-minute position. The error bar was calculated from the standard deviation value (n=3). Considering that the measurement was conducted within one minute of sample addition, the crosstalk effect due to H2O2 diffusion was negligibly small in this experiment. The interference at site B from H2O2 generated at site A was also negligible because of the same mechanism. Sites A and B were 1.4 mm apart. This experiment confirmed selective detection of L-lactate and glucose; the measurement of interference behavior will aid in the design of other integrated sensing systems.Figure 8
Crosstalk behavior: temporal measurement of reaction current at 0.7 V on site A while site B is active.


## 4.3. Calibration Curve Evaluation

CV curves were measured using various concentrations of L-lactate and glucose in PBS. Figures9 and 10 show the dependence of the shape of the curve on the concentration of L-lactate and glucose, respectively. At the LOD-modified WE, the reaction current increased when the L-lactate concentration increased. At the GOD-modified WE, the reaction current increased when the glucose concentration increased. Anodic currents at a potential of 0.7 V were used to create calibration plots of L-lactate and glucose (Figure 11 and Figure 12, resp.). The dynamic ranges were about 0.2–1.0 mM in L-lactate and 2.0–8.0 mM in glucose. The sensitivities were 65 nA/mM and 15 nA/mM, respectively using WE of 0.5 mm2. The 3σ detection limit was 0.19 mM and 1.1 mM, respectively.Figure 9
Cyclic voltammetry with various L-lactate concentrations. Scan rate was 50 mV s−1.Figure 10
Cyclic voltammetry with various glucose concentrations. Scan rate was 50 mV s−1.Figure 11
Calibration plot of L-lactate concentration at site A.Figure 12
Calibration plot of glucose concentration at site B.


## 5. Conclusions

In this study, we have successfully designed and fabricated an electrochemical sensing system with electrodes and a potentiostat integrated on a single chip. Not only WEs but also RE was installed on the chip. After simple pretreatment, LOD and GOD were immobilized on the WEs separately using the polyion complex method to detect L-lactate and glucose selectively and quantitatively. The interference behavior between two sites of WE was also studied. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first chip on which multisite WEs, a CE, an RE, and signal-processing circuits are integrated onto a single chip. L-lactate and glucose were chosen to demonstrate the chip-shaped electrochemical sensing system. The concentrations of L-lactate and glucose were measured selectively at their respective sites. The measured dynamic ranges were 0.2–1.0 mM for L-lactate and 2.0–8.0 mM for glucose. The sensitivities were 65 nA/mM and 15 nA/mM, respectively, using WE of 0.5 mm2, and the 3σ detection limit was 0.19 mM and 1.1 mM, respectively. Withthe integration of the standard CMOS process, this kind of chip could be the best candidate for realizing point-of-care testing, including bedside diagnosis or on-site health checkups in the future.



---

*Source: 190284-2011-06-16.xml*