# The Mongolian Vowel Acoustic Model Based on the Clustering Algorithm

Authors: Wujisguleng
Journal: Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

In order to solve the problem of vowel acoustic modeling in the Mongolian language and provide more scientific core technical support for speech recognition system, a vowel acoustic model based on the clustering algorithm and speech recognition technology was proposed. The language vowel recognition system and Mongolian speech recognition system are constructed, the Mongolian vowel acoustic database is mainly designed, and the number of vowel samples is constantly increased to ensure the acoustic and linguistic phenomena that may be encountered in the Mongolian vowel database. At the same time, classification modeling and context modeling are used to improve the accuracy of the acoustic model. Through experiments, it is found that the experimental results of sparse tritones show that the model has the highest recognition accuracy of 45% for sentences and 86% for words, which is more than 2% higher than before, providing some technical support for Mongolian learning and pronunciation.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Speech recognition is to convert human language information into corresponding text or command through the recognition and understanding of speech with the help of machine learning technology, which is also an important topic in the field of artificial intelligence research in recent years. The development of speech recognition technology is bound to have a profound impact on the future human-computer interface [1]. In the research process of speech recognition, it is the most challenging problem for specific people; large vocabulary and continuous speech recognition are the most difficult research topic for vowel recognition of minority languages. The object of this study is the Mongolian language. With the deepening of the international information wave, the Mongolian autonomous region is rapidly entering the information society; in this process, Mongolian has gradually become a relatively influential language in the world, which is why it is of great practical significance to construct the vowel acoustic model of the Mongolian language.The 1950s can be said to be the initial stage of the exploration of speech recognition technology, during which researchers mainly from the angle of acoustic phonetics sought to solve the problem of speech recognition. A milestone in the development of automatic speech recognition devices is the Audrey system developed by some scholars. The speech recognition system can recognize the pronunciation of isolated words in English by specific speakers based on the variation information of vowel formant frequency extracted by analog components. Other research achievements of this period include the following: some scholars developed a phoneme recognizer for recognizing four vowels and nine consonants [2]. The novelty of this research lies in the introduction of statistical grammar in speech recognition to improve the accuracy of phoneme recognition. Some scholars have developed a vowel recognizer that can recognize ten vowels in a specific context. Its progress is that the system is targeted at the nonspecific pronunciation network.


## 2. Related Works

With the advent of the new century, the research on speech recognition has taken on a new look. DARPA continues to focus on speech recognition research, launching global autonomous language development projects in 2002, 2011, and 2012 to use computer software to retrieve, analyze, and translate vast volumes of multilingual speech and text, so as to mainly solve the problems of the robust automatic speech tagging project focused on speech recognition, speaker recognition, and language recognition in noisy environments and to design a multilingual translation project to accurately translate narrow Mandarin and multiple Arabic dialects from a variety of media into English [3]. While integrating increasingly sophisticated speech recognition technologies, these projects have put higher demands on the technology itself, and more emphasis on speech recognition and other cutting-edge technology organic integration and comprehensive application is increased. The discriminative training technique of the acoustic model in HMM framework has been developed in depth. For example, the minimum word/phoneme error discriminative training criterion was proposed at the same time; a new acoustic model that jumped out of the HMM framework was also explored and deep learning became a new research frontier in the field of machine learning and artificial intelligence. Specifically, the application of deep learning in speech recognition. With the improvement of computer hardware performance and the progress of machine learning algorithms [4]. The idea of using the neural network to replace the gaussian mixture model in the hidden Markov model proposed in the 1990s has gained attention again, and the theory and method of using the multilayer deep neural network to replace GMM have achieved great success in practice, which has become a new milestone in the field of speech recognition. New extension applications based on simple speech recognition, such as speech retrieval and multimodal speech recognition, have gradually emerged and become an important research field [5].


## 3. The Clustering Analysis Algorithm

The clustering algorithm is an important branch of machine learning and generally adopts unsupervised learning. Using the clustering analysis algorithm, the data in the database can be divided into several categories. The distance between individuals in the same category is small, so the objects in the cluster have high similarity. However, the distance between individuals in different categories is relatively large, with great differences [6]. The clustering model can be described as follows:n data objects in m dimensional space Rm are divided, and the vector with the smallest distance from the cluster center is assigned to the corresponding K-means cluster. In cluster analysis, j is the number of attributes of the cluster sample, n is the number of samples, and k is the number of classifications preset by the user. The mathematical model is as follows:for vectorsXi、Xj of m dimensional space Rm, the following formulas are considered:(1)Xi=Xi1,Xi2,Xim,(2)Xj=Xj1,Xj2,Xjm.For the clustering center, ifthe following is satisfied:(3)dXi,We=mindXi,We,j=1,2,...,k.Then, the following is considered:(4)Xi∈WC.Using the basic idea of combining the statistical method and the data mining algorithm, some existing effective statistical methods are combined with the data mining algorithm to generate some efficient statistical methods and to increase the efficiency of cluster analysis. Similarity measurement method: The clustering analysis algorithm divides the data set intok classes, and k values can be specified by the user [7]. To achieve the best results, the clustering performance indicator is minimized and allocated to adjacent classes according to the minimum distance [8]. It is quantified by the following distance methods:(1)
Similarity coefficient: it is represented by a number between 0 and 1. If the samples are similar, the value is close to 1; otherwise, it is close to 0.(2)
Distance function: setΩ as sample points, distance function will meet the following formula:Positive characterization:(5)Dx,y≥0.Symmetry:(6)Dx,y=Dy,x.Triangle inequality:(7)Dx,y+Dy,x≥Dx,z.Or:(8)Dx,y≤maxDx,z,Dz,y.In the clustering method, the frequently used quantitative methods are as follows:First, absolute distanceas follows:(9)DX,Y=∑i=1kXi−Yi.Second, Euclidean distanceas follows:(10)DX,Y=∑i=1kXi−Yi21/2.Third, Chebyshev distanceas follows:(11)DX,Y=∑i=1kXi−Yi∞1/∞.(3)
Criterion function:When the final result of the clustering algorithm satisfies the criterion function, the algorithm ends. In order to improve the accuracy of the clustering algorithm, it is necessary to select the appropriate criterion function [9, 10]. The general criterion functions are as follows:First, the error square sum criterion function.Suppose the mixed sample setas follows:(12)X=x1,x2,x3,...,xn.In order to measure the instructions of the clustering algorithm, the error sum of the squares criterion function is adopted, and the definition formula is as follows:(13)JC=∑j=1C∑k=1nxkj−mj2,(14)mj=1nj∑j=1nxjj=1,2,...,c.In the formula, mj represents the mean value of samples in the jth category and nj represents the number of samples in the jth category [11]. According to the definition of the criterion function in the above formula, it is not difficult to find its value C cluster centers and samples in each cluster [12]. The larger the value of JC is, the larger the clustering error is, and the lower the quality of the clustering algorithm is.Second, weighted average square distance and criteria are given as follows:(15)JI=∑j=1CPjSj∗,(16)Sj∗=2njnj−1∑x∈xi∑x∈xjx−x′2,where Sj∗ is the mean square distance between samples of classes [13]. The weighted average square distance and criterion function can be used to get the correct clustering result.Third, distance between classes and criteriais as follows:(17)Jb=∑j=1Cmj−m2.In the formula,mj is the sample mean vector of type wj and m is the mean vector of all samples. The larger the distance between classes and the criterion function, the higher the separation of clustering results and the higher the quality of clustering [14, 15].


## 4. The Language Vowel Recognition System

### 4.1. Speech Recognition System Framework

The speech recognition system is a pattern recognition system in essence, a complete speech recognition system can be roughly divided into the following three parts: (1) speech feature extraction part [16], whose purpose is to extract speech waveform with the change of time speech feature sequence; (2) in the part of the acoustic model and pattern matching, the acoustic model is generated by the acquired speech features through the learning algorithm, and the input simultaneous model of speech features is matched and compared to obtain the recognition results; (3) the language model and language processing. The language model refers to the grammatical network formed by voice recognition commands or the language model formed by statistical methods. The framework of the Mongolian language nonspecific person, large vocabulary and the continuous speech recognition system in this study is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Speech recognition system framework.


### 4.2. Key Technologies of the Speech Recognition System

#### 4.2.1. Feature Parameter Extraction Technology

Since human vocal organs can only change relatively slowly, speech signals can be approximated as transient and stationary in speech recognition. By dividing the speech signal into data frames of tens of milliseconds, it can be analyzed using various existing digital signal processing techniques [17]. The most commonly used cepstrum feature extraction block diagram is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Block diagram of MFCC extraction.


#### 4.2.2. Selection of Modeling Units

Syllable units are more common in Chinese speech recognition, mainly because Chinese is a monosyllabic language. Although there are about 1300 syllables, there are about 408 atonal voids excluding tone, which is a relatively small number. Phoneme units are often used in the study of English speech recognition. According to the characteristics of Mongolian phonetics and linguistics, we choose phoneme as the lowest modeling unit [18].


#### 4.2.3. Model Training and Pattern Matching Technology

Model training is to obtain model parameters representing the essential characteristics of the model from a large number of known patterns according to certain criteria, while pattern matching is to make the best match between unknown patterns and a model in the model base according to certain criteria. The model training and pattern matching techniques used in speech recognition mainly include dynamic time correction, hidden Markov model, and the artificial neural network.


## 4.1. Speech Recognition System Framework

The speech recognition system is a pattern recognition system in essence, a complete speech recognition system can be roughly divided into the following three parts: (1) speech feature extraction part [16], whose purpose is to extract speech waveform with the change of time speech feature sequence; (2) in the part of the acoustic model and pattern matching, the acoustic model is generated by the acquired speech features through the learning algorithm, and the input simultaneous model of speech features is matched and compared to obtain the recognition results; (3) the language model and language processing. The language model refers to the grammatical network formed by voice recognition commands or the language model formed by statistical methods. The framework of the Mongolian language nonspecific person, large vocabulary and the continuous speech recognition system in this study is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
Speech recognition system framework.


## 4.2. Key Technologies of the Speech Recognition System

### 4.2.1. Feature Parameter Extraction Technology

Since human vocal organs can only change relatively slowly, speech signals can be approximated as transient and stationary in speech recognition. By dividing the speech signal into data frames of tens of milliseconds, it can be analyzed using various existing digital signal processing techniques [17]. The most commonly used cepstrum feature extraction block diagram is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Block diagram of MFCC extraction.


### 4.2.2. Selection of Modeling Units

Syllable units are more common in Chinese speech recognition, mainly because Chinese is a monosyllabic language. Although there are about 1300 syllables, there are about 408 atonal voids excluding tone, which is a relatively small number. Phoneme units are often used in the study of English speech recognition. According to the characteristics of Mongolian phonetics and linguistics, we choose phoneme as the lowest modeling unit [18].


### 4.2.3. Model Training and Pattern Matching Technology

Model training is to obtain model parameters representing the essential characteristics of the model from a large number of known patterns according to certain criteria, while pattern matching is to make the best match between unknown patterns and a model in the model base according to certain criteria. The model training and pattern matching techniques used in speech recognition mainly include dynamic time correction, hidden Markov model, and the artificial neural network.


## 4.2.1. Feature Parameter Extraction Technology

Since human vocal organs can only change relatively slowly, speech signals can be approximated as transient and stationary in speech recognition. By dividing the speech signal into data frames of tens of milliseconds, it can be analyzed using various existing digital signal processing techniques [17]. The most commonly used cepstrum feature extraction block diagram is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Block diagram of MFCC extraction.


## 4.2.2. Selection of Modeling Units

Syllable units are more common in Chinese speech recognition, mainly because Chinese is a monosyllabic language. Although there are about 1300 syllables, there are about 408 atonal voids excluding tone, which is a relatively small number. Phoneme units are often used in the study of English speech recognition. According to the characteristics of Mongolian phonetics and linguistics, we choose phoneme as the lowest modeling unit [18].


## 4.2.3. Model Training and Pattern Matching Technology

Model training is to obtain model parameters representing the essential characteristics of the model from a large number of known patterns according to certain criteria, while pattern matching is to make the best match between unknown patterns and a model in the model base according to certain criteria. The model training and pattern matching techniques used in speech recognition mainly include dynamic time correction, hidden Markov model, and the artificial neural network.


## 5. Construction of Basic Resources for the Mongolian Continuous Speech Recognition System

### 5.1. Statistical Selection of Corpus

At the word level, there is strong coarticulation between syllables and within syllables. That is, the pronunciation of a vowel or consonant is influenced by its neighboring consonant. The problem of coarticulation cannot be solved by using vowels or consonants alone, which affects the accuracy of speech recognition. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a three-tone model in continuous speech recognition, that is, to consider the influence of the left and right sides of the vowel or consonant adjacent to it. In the selection of language data, we should try to make the selected language data cover all the triphones in Mongolian. In the training of the language model, it is necessary to ensure that each tritone appears no less than 10 times in the corpus to basically ensure the accuracy of the model. When the frequency of occurrence is too small, it is called data sparsity [19].According to the collected corpus and the characteristics of the Mongolian language, we adopt the method of automatic selection and manual supplement. The word frequency is calculated using the clustering algorithm described above, and the words with greater word frequency are screened out, and these words are considered high-frequency words. Pick out all the sentences that contain the most frequent words and filter out the sentences that are too long and too short. Calculate the priority coefficient; rank each sentence in descending order of priority. Choose some sentences with high priority according to the ranking results. After counting, we selected a corpus of about 16,800 sentences, about 220,000 words, containing more than 10,000 words.


### 5.2. Corpus Construction of the Mongolian Speech Recognition System

Under the guidance of Mongolian corpus construction principles, we have collected about ten thousand words of Mongolian corpus so far. This corpus can be roughly divided into four categories, such as daily language, hotel language, tourism language, textbook, news, and newspapers. Its composition ratio is shown in Table1.Table 1
Composition of the corpus.
Corpus categoryProportion (%)Everyday language5Hotel and tourist expressions7Textbook18Newspapers70In order to establish a standard Mongolian sound library, we recorded the students with a relatively standard Mongolian accent. In the process of the language library collection, we mainly follow the following principles:(1)
According to the different voice characteristics of men and women, the ratio of male and female recording personnel is 3 : 2(2)
Accent must be standard(3)
Sound is mature and the waveform is clearAccording to the above principles, we collected the voice data of 80 girls and 120 boys. The voice information is stored in the voice database by the recording tool. At the same time, the following information of the recording personnel is also saved in the database: name, gender, age, the native place of the recording personnel, the corpus text read, and so on. The recording tool displays the spoken corpus text sentence-by-sentence to ensure the alignment of the textual corpus with the phonetic corpus [20]. According to the displayed waveform, the quality of speech can be judged and adjusted accordingly.


### 5.3. Construction of Mongolian Speech Recognition System Dictionary

In the establishment of the systematic dictionary, we refer to the domestic and foreign Mongolian language academic circles in the investigation and research of Mongolian dialects commonly used to mark the pronunciation of words. At the same time, considering the simplicity of labeling and the fact that the platform could not recognize some special labeling symbols such as signs, appropriate labeling symbols were adjusted. The final phonetic labeling symbols adopted in the Mongolian speech recognition system dictionary are shown in Tables2 and 3.Table 2
Vowel marks in the dictionary.
Serial number1234567Mongolian letterCommon sound annotationaeioudoduShort note annotationasesisosudsodsusLong note labelaleliloludlodlulTable 3
Marks for prevowels and diphthongs in the dictionary.
Serial number12345678910Constituent elementsa + ia + ie + ie + io + io + iud + iod + iu + iu + iMarkaeaeleeeioeoeludiodiuiuilSerial Number11121314151617181920Constituent elementsi + ai + ai + udu + ee + ui + (y) + ai + (y) + ai + (y) + eud + (w) + aud + (w) + a + iMarkiaialiudueeuioiolieudaudae


## 5.1. Statistical Selection of Corpus

At the word level, there is strong coarticulation between syllables and within syllables. That is, the pronunciation of a vowel or consonant is influenced by its neighboring consonant. The problem of coarticulation cannot be solved by using vowels or consonants alone, which affects the accuracy of speech recognition. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a three-tone model in continuous speech recognition, that is, to consider the influence of the left and right sides of the vowel or consonant adjacent to it. In the selection of language data, we should try to make the selected language data cover all the triphones in Mongolian. In the training of the language model, it is necessary to ensure that each tritone appears no less than 10 times in the corpus to basically ensure the accuracy of the model. When the frequency of occurrence is too small, it is called data sparsity [19].According to the collected corpus and the characteristics of the Mongolian language, we adopt the method of automatic selection and manual supplement. The word frequency is calculated using the clustering algorithm described above, and the words with greater word frequency are screened out, and these words are considered high-frequency words. Pick out all the sentences that contain the most frequent words and filter out the sentences that are too long and too short. Calculate the priority coefficient; rank each sentence in descending order of priority. Choose some sentences with high priority according to the ranking results. After counting, we selected a corpus of about 16,800 sentences, about 220,000 words, containing more than 10,000 words.


## 5.2. Corpus Construction of the Mongolian Speech Recognition System

Under the guidance of Mongolian corpus construction principles, we have collected about ten thousand words of Mongolian corpus so far. This corpus can be roughly divided into four categories, such as daily language, hotel language, tourism language, textbook, news, and newspapers. Its composition ratio is shown in Table1.Table 1
Composition of the corpus.
Corpus categoryProportion (%)Everyday language5Hotel and tourist expressions7Textbook18Newspapers70In order to establish a standard Mongolian sound library, we recorded the students with a relatively standard Mongolian accent. In the process of the language library collection, we mainly follow the following principles:(1)
According to the different voice characteristics of men and women, the ratio of male and female recording personnel is 3 : 2(2)
Accent must be standard(3)
Sound is mature and the waveform is clearAccording to the above principles, we collected the voice data of 80 girls and 120 boys. The voice information is stored in the voice database by the recording tool. At the same time, the following information of the recording personnel is also saved in the database: name, gender, age, the native place of the recording personnel, the corpus text read, and so on. The recording tool displays the spoken corpus text sentence-by-sentence to ensure the alignment of the textual corpus with the phonetic corpus [20]. According to the displayed waveform, the quality of speech can be judged and adjusted accordingly.


## 5.3. Construction of Mongolian Speech Recognition System Dictionary

In the establishment of the systematic dictionary, we refer to the domestic and foreign Mongolian language academic circles in the investigation and research of Mongolian dialects commonly used to mark the pronunciation of words. At the same time, considering the simplicity of labeling and the fact that the platform could not recognize some special labeling symbols such as signs, appropriate labeling symbols were adjusted. The final phonetic labeling symbols adopted in the Mongolian speech recognition system dictionary are shown in Tables2 and 3.Table 2
Vowel marks in the dictionary.
Serial number1234567Mongolian letterCommon sound annotationaeioudoduShort note annotationasesisosudsodsusLong note labelaleliloludlodlulTable 3
Marks for prevowels and diphthongs in the dictionary.
Serial number12345678910Constituent elementsa + ia + ie + ie + io + io + iud + iod + iu + iu + iMarkaeaeleeeioeoeludiodiuiuilSerial Number11121314151617181920Constituent elementsi + ai + ai + udu + ee + ui + (y) + ai + (y) + ai + (y) + eud + (w) + aud + (w) + a + iMarkiaialiudueeuioiolieudaudae


## 6. System Identification Experiment

### 6.1. Identification Experiment

The experiment of this article is to build the acoustic model of the Mongolian continuous speech recognition system based on HTK3.4 and then improve and optimize the HMM model. This article mainly studies the parameter sharing strategy of different models by using the problem set to guide decision tree splitting. Monogol1 (125 Mongolian sentences) and monogol2 (118 Mongolian sentences) were named as the corpus of textbooks for experimental subjects. Dialoguel1 (390 Sentences in Mongolian), dialoguel2 (381 sentences in Mongolian), and dialoguel3 (384 sentences in Mongolian) are divided into three parts [21].This article makes an experimental comparison between invisible tritones and sparse tritones in the corpus of textbooks and daily dialogues. The experimental process is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Experimental process.


#### 6.1.1. Evaluation Criteria of Recognition Results

The evaluation of recognition results is mainly carried out by using the evaluation tool HResults in HTK Toolkit. The resulting results include sentence and word recognition rates and other information. The sentence recognition rate is the ratio of the number of correctly identified sentences to the total number of tested sentences. Word recognition rate graph: Word recognition rate can be obtained by comparing the recognition result word sequence with the reference codex word sequence, which is the correct word-level codex for each sentence.


#### 6.1.2. Experiments on Invisible Tritones

Invisible tritones are those that appear in the test sentence but do not participate in any training process. That is to say, there is no template matching them in the HMM model library participating in the training. The purpose of this experiment is to test the recognition of invisible tritones. Therefore, each part of the textbook corpus and daily conversation corpus are strictly divided into the training corpus and test corpus. On the premise that a certain number of invisible trinosophones appear in the test corpus, the selection of the training corpus should try to ensure that the ratio of male and female corpus reaches 3 : 2. Table4 shows the composition of training sentences and test sentences in the experiment.Table 4
Composition of training sentences and test sentences in invisible three-tone subexperiment.
SubjectsNumber of training sentencesTraining the sex ratioNumber of test sentencesTest number of wordsMongol 1105∗ 30 = 31501.520∗ 30 = 600390∗ 30 = 11700Mongol 2100∗ 30 = 30001.518∗ 30 = 540240∗ 30 = 7200Mongol-all61501.5114018900Dialogue 1325∗ 45 = 146251.565∗ 45 = 2925306∗ 45 = 13770Dialogue 2318∗ 37 = 117661.4763∗ 37 = 2331313∗ 37 = 11581Dialogue 3320∗ 30 = 96001.564∗ 30 = 1920371∗ 30 = 11130Dialogue-all359911.49717636481In our Mongol-all experiment, the number of all tritones generated by the dictionary before the decision number binding is 3373, the number of tritones in the training is 3154, and the number of invisible tritones is 3373–3154 = 219. In the experiment for dialogue-all, the number of all tritones generated by the dictionary before decision number binding is 3185, the number of tritones in the training is 2926, and the number of invisible tritones is 3185–2926 = 259.During the experiment, we found that the system reported an error when the invisible tritones were identified before the decision tree state binding, and the invisible tritones could not be identified [22]. If invisible tritones are recognized after the decision tree state binding operation, the recognition command can work normally without the system error, and the recognition rate of invisible tritones is certain.  The final results of the experiment are shown in Table 5.Table 5
Invisible triphonon experiment results.
SubjectsSentence level recognition experimental resultsWord level recognition experimental results% CorrectHSN% CorrectACCHDSINMongol 19.675854260077.6768.4590873422271107811700Mongol 218.159844254079.5470.17572713713366757200Mongol-all13.68156984114078.3869.11148144793607175318900Dialogue 116.034692456292563.5545.7187513514668245713770Dialogue 218.664351896233160.3343.3569872894305196711581dialogue 313.802651655192059.2142.9065903764164181511130Dialogue-all16.2911696007717661.2044.1022328101613137623936481


#### 6.1.3. Experiments on Sparse Tritones

Sparse tritones refer to the tritones that occur in training sentences but rarely. Because of the low frequency in the training process, it often cannot get good training. The purpose of this experiment is to test the recognition of sparse tritones before and after the establishment of the decision tree. We divided all the people involved in recording into trainers and testers. The trainer’s corpus is used for training, and the tester’s corpus is used for identification. The selection of training corpus should ensure that the ratio of male and female corpus should reach 3 : 2. Table6 shows the composition of training sentences and test sentences in the experiment [23].Table 6
Composition of training sentences and test sentences in sparse three-tone subexperiment.
SubjectsNumber of training sentencesTraining the sex ratioNumber of test sentencesTest number of wordsMongol 1125∗ 20 = 25001.5125∗ 7 = 8752560∗ 7 = 17920Mongol 2118∗ 22 = 25961.44118∗ 6 = 7081879∗ 6 = 11274Mongol-all50961.47158329194Dialogue 1390∗ 33 = 128701.54390∗ 11 = 42901761∗ 11 = 19371Dialogue 2381∗ 27 = 102871.45381∗ 9 = 34291659∗ 9 = 14931Dialogue 3384∗ 2 = 76801.5384∗ 7 = 26882001∗ 7 = 14007Dialogue-all308371.51040748309Through experiments, we find that the recognition effect after decision tree state bundling is improved to some extent compared with that before decision tree state bundling. The experimental results before and after decision tree state bundling are shown in Tables7 and 8.Table 7
Recognition results of decision tree state before extraction.
SubjectsSentence level recognition experimental resultsWord level recognition experimental results% CorrectHSN% CorrectACCHDSINMongol 116.3414373287584.278.34150883532479105017920Mongol 225.1417853070891.3384.421029717080777911274Mongol-all20.283211262158386.9580.69253855233286182929194Dialogue 140.9517572533429083.2472.96161244362811199119371Dialogue 243.5514931936342983.0473.92123992922240136214931Dialogue 336.579831705268880.6671.18112982782431132814007Dialogue-all40.67423361741040782.4372.743982110067482468148309Table 8
Recognition results of decision tree state bundling.
SubjectsSentence level recognition experimental resultsWord level recognition experimental results% CorrectHSN% CorrectAccHDSINMongol 116.5714573087584.8580.4915206422229278317920Mongol 228.2520050870890.786.11022517987051811274Mongol-all21.793451238158387.1182.65254316013162130129194Dialogue 143.2318552435429083.273.74161174612793183319371Dialogue 244.8415381891342982.7174.37123492932289124514931Dialogue 337.9510201668268880.7271.99113062782423122214007Dialogue-all42.4441359941040782.3373.433977210327505430048309


### 6.2. Identification of Experimental Results

The following conclusions can be drawn from the above experiments:(1)
In the experiment of invisible tritones, if invisible tritones are identified without decision tree state binding, the system will report an error. These invisible tritones can be identified effectively after state binding in the decision tree. This is because the invisible tritones to be recognized did not participate in the initial model training process, and the system could not recognize these tritones before the decision tree binding [24].(2)
In the experiment of sparse triton, the recognition effect after decision tree state binding is improved to some extent compared with that before decision tree state binding. The maximum improvement percentage of sentence recognition accuracy and word recognition accuracy reached 3.11% and 2.15%, respectively, and the average improvement percentage reached 1.65% and 1.22%, respectively. The comparison of sentence recognition accuracy before and after decision tree state bundling is shown in Figure4, and the comparison of word recognition accuracy before and after decision tree state bundling is shown in Figure 5.Figure 4
Comparison of sentence recognition accuracy before and after decision tree binding in sparse triton experiment.Figure 5
Comparison of word recognition accuracy before and after decision tree binding in sparse three-tone subexperiment.


## 6.1. Identification Experiment

The experiment of this article is to build the acoustic model of the Mongolian continuous speech recognition system based on HTK3.4 and then improve and optimize the HMM model. This article mainly studies the parameter sharing strategy of different models by using the problem set to guide decision tree splitting. Monogol1 (125 Mongolian sentences) and monogol2 (118 Mongolian sentences) were named as the corpus of textbooks for experimental subjects. Dialoguel1 (390 Sentences in Mongolian), dialoguel2 (381 sentences in Mongolian), and dialoguel3 (384 sentences in Mongolian) are divided into three parts [21].This article makes an experimental comparison between invisible tritones and sparse tritones in the corpus of textbooks and daily dialogues. The experimental process is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Experimental process.


### 6.1.1. Evaluation Criteria of Recognition Results

The evaluation of recognition results is mainly carried out by using the evaluation tool HResults in HTK Toolkit. The resulting results include sentence and word recognition rates and other information. The sentence recognition rate is the ratio of the number of correctly identified sentences to the total number of tested sentences. Word recognition rate graph: Word recognition rate can be obtained by comparing the recognition result word sequence with the reference codex word sequence, which is the correct word-level codex for each sentence.


### 6.1.2. Experiments on Invisible Tritones

Invisible tritones are those that appear in the test sentence but do not participate in any training process. That is to say, there is no template matching them in the HMM model library participating in the training. The purpose of this experiment is to test the recognition of invisible tritones. Therefore, each part of the textbook corpus and daily conversation corpus are strictly divided into the training corpus and test corpus. On the premise that a certain number of invisible trinosophones appear in the test corpus, the selection of the training corpus should try to ensure that the ratio of male and female corpus reaches 3 : 2. Table4 shows the composition of training sentences and test sentences in the experiment.Table 4
Composition of training sentences and test sentences in invisible three-tone subexperiment.
SubjectsNumber of training sentencesTraining the sex ratioNumber of test sentencesTest number of wordsMongol 1105∗ 30 = 31501.520∗ 30 = 600390∗ 30 = 11700Mongol 2100∗ 30 = 30001.518∗ 30 = 540240∗ 30 = 7200Mongol-all61501.5114018900Dialogue 1325∗ 45 = 146251.565∗ 45 = 2925306∗ 45 = 13770Dialogue 2318∗ 37 = 117661.4763∗ 37 = 2331313∗ 37 = 11581Dialogue 3320∗ 30 = 96001.564∗ 30 = 1920371∗ 30 = 11130Dialogue-all359911.49717636481In our Mongol-all experiment, the number of all tritones generated by the dictionary before the decision number binding is 3373, the number of tritones in the training is 3154, and the number of invisible tritones is 3373–3154 = 219. In the experiment for dialogue-all, the number of all tritones generated by the dictionary before decision number binding is 3185, the number of tritones in the training is 2926, and the number of invisible tritones is 3185–2926 = 259.During the experiment, we found that the system reported an error when the invisible tritones were identified before the decision tree state binding, and the invisible tritones could not be identified [22]. If invisible tritones are recognized after the decision tree state binding operation, the recognition command can work normally without the system error, and the recognition rate of invisible tritones is certain.  The final results of the experiment are shown in Table 5.Table 5
Invisible triphonon experiment results.
SubjectsSentence level recognition experimental resultsWord level recognition experimental results% CorrectHSN% CorrectACCHDSINMongol 19.675854260077.6768.4590873422271107811700Mongol 218.159844254079.5470.17572713713366757200Mongol-all13.68156984114078.3869.11148144793607175318900Dialogue 116.034692456292563.5545.7187513514668245713770Dialogue 218.664351896233160.3343.3569872894305196711581dialogue 313.802651655192059.2142.9065903764164181511130Dialogue-all16.2911696007717661.2044.1022328101613137623936481


### 6.1.3. Experiments on Sparse Tritones

Sparse tritones refer to the tritones that occur in training sentences but rarely. Because of the low frequency in the training process, it often cannot get good training. The purpose of this experiment is to test the recognition of sparse tritones before and after the establishment of the decision tree. We divided all the people involved in recording into trainers and testers. The trainer’s corpus is used for training, and the tester’s corpus is used for identification. The selection of training corpus should ensure that the ratio of male and female corpus should reach 3 : 2. Table6 shows the composition of training sentences and test sentences in the experiment [23].Table 6
Composition of training sentences and test sentences in sparse three-tone subexperiment.
SubjectsNumber of training sentencesTraining the sex ratioNumber of test sentencesTest number of wordsMongol 1125∗ 20 = 25001.5125∗ 7 = 8752560∗ 7 = 17920Mongol 2118∗ 22 = 25961.44118∗ 6 = 7081879∗ 6 = 11274Mongol-all50961.47158329194Dialogue 1390∗ 33 = 128701.54390∗ 11 = 42901761∗ 11 = 19371Dialogue 2381∗ 27 = 102871.45381∗ 9 = 34291659∗ 9 = 14931Dialogue 3384∗ 2 = 76801.5384∗ 7 = 26882001∗ 7 = 14007Dialogue-all308371.51040748309Through experiments, we find that the recognition effect after decision tree state bundling is improved to some extent compared with that before decision tree state bundling. The experimental results before and after decision tree state bundling are shown in Tables7 and 8.Table 7
Recognition results of decision tree state before extraction.
SubjectsSentence level recognition experimental resultsWord level recognition experimental results% CorrectHSN% CorrectACCHDSINMongol 116.3414373287584.278.34150883532479105017920Mongol 225.1417853070891.3384.421029717080777911274Mongol-all20.283211262158386.9580.69253855233286182929194Dialogue 140.9517572533429083.2472.96161244362811199119371Dialogue 243.5514931936342983.0473.92123992922240136214931Dialogue 336.579831705268880.6671.18112982782431132814007Dialogue-all40.67423361741040782.4372.743982110067482468148309Table 8
Recognition results of decision tree state bundling.
SubjectsSentence level recognition experimental resultsWord level recognition experimental results% CorrectHSN% CorrectAccHDSINMongol 116.5714573087584.8580.4915206422229278317920Mongol 228.2520050870890.786.11022517987051811274Mongol-all21.793451238158387.1182.65254316013162130129194Dialogue 143.2318552435429083.273.74161174612793183319371Dialogue 244.8415381891342982.7174.37123492932289124514931Dialogue 337.9510201668268880.7271.99113062782423122214007Dialogue-all42.4441359941040782.3373.433977210327505430048309


## 6.1.1. Evaluation Criteria of Recognition Results

The evaluation of recognition results is mainly carried out by using the evaluation tool HResults in HTK Toolkit. The resulting results include sentence and word recognition rates and other information. The sentence recognition rate is the ratio of the number of correctly identified sentences to the total number of tested sentences. Word recognition rate graph: Word recognition rate can be obtained by comparing the recognition result word sequence with the reference codex word sequence, which is the correct word-level codex for each sentence.


## 6.1.2. Experiments on Invisible Tritones

Invisible tritones are those that appear in the test sentence but do not participate in any training process. That is to say, there is no template matching them in the HMM model library participating in the training. The purpose of this experiment is to test the recognition of invisible tritones. Therefore, each part of the textbook corpus and daily conversation corpus are strictly divided into the training corpus and test corpus. On the premise that a certain number of invisible trinosophones appear in the test corpus, the selection of the training corpus should try to ensure that the ratio of male and female corpus reaches 3 : 2. Table4 shows the composition of training sentences and test sentences in the experiment.Table 4
Composition of training sentences and test sentences in invisible three-tone subexperiment.
SubjectsNumber of training sentencesTraining the sex ratioNumber of test sentencesTest number of wordsMongol 1105∗ 30 = 31501.520∗ 30 = 600390∗ 30 = 11700Mongol 2100∗ 30 = 30001.518∗ 30 = 540240∗ 30 = 7200Mongol-all61501.5114018900Dialogue 1325∗ 45 = 146251.565∗ 45 = 2925306∗ 45 = 13770Dialogue 2318∗ 37 = 117661.4763∗ 37 = 2331313∗ 37 = 11581Dialogue 3320∗ 30 = 96001.564∗ 30 = 1920371∗ 30 = 11130Dialogue-all359911.49717636481In our Mongol-all experiment, the number of all tritones generated by the dictionary before the decision number binding is 3373, the number of tritones in the training is 3154, and the number of invisible tritones is 3373–3154 = 219. In the experiment for dialogue-all, the number of all tritones generated by the dictionary before decision number binding is 3185, the number of tritones in the training is 2926, and the number of invisible tritones is 3185–2926 = 259.During the experiment, we found that the system reported an error when the invisible tritones were identified before the decision tree state binding, and the invisible tritones could not be identified [22]. If invisible tritones are recognized after the decision tree state binding operation, the recognition command can work normally without the system error, and the recognition rate of invisible tritones is certain.  The final results of the experiment are shown in Table 5.Table 5
Invisible triphonon experiment results.
SubjectsSentence level recognition experimental resultsWord level recognition experimental results% CorrectHSN% CorrectACCHDSINMongol 19.675854260077.6768.4590873422271107811700Mongol 218.159844254079.5470.17572713713366757200Mongol-all13.68156984114078.3869.11148144793607175318900Dialogue 116.034692456292563.5545.7187513514668245713770Dialogue 218.664351896233160.3343.3569872894305196711581dialogue 313.802651655192059.2142.9065903764164181511130Dialogue-all16.2911696007717661.2044.1022328101613137623936481


## 6.1.3. Experiments on Sparse Tritones

Sparse tritones refer to the tritones that occur in training sentences but rarely. Because of the low frequency in the training process, it often cannot get good training. The purpose of this experiment is to test the recognition of sparse tritones before and after the establishment of the decision tree. We divided all the people involved in recording into trainers and testers. The trainer’s corpus is used for training, and the tester’s corpus is used for identification. The selection of training corpus should ensure that the ratio of male and female corpus should reach 3 : 2. Table6 shows the composition of training sentences and test sentences in the experiment [23].Table 6
Composition of training sentences and test sentences in sparse three-tone subexperiment.
SubjectsNumber of training sentencesTraining the sex ratioNumber of test sentencesTest number of wordsMongol 1125∗ 20 = 25001.5125∗ 7 = 8752560∗ 7 = 17920Mongol 2118∗ 22 = 25961.44118∗ 6 = 7081879∗ 6 = 11274Mongol-all50961.47158329194Dialogue 1390∗ 33 = 128701.54390∗ 11 = 42901761∗ 11 = 19371Dialogue 2381∗ 27 = 102871.45381∗ 9 = 34291659∗ 9 = 14931Dialogue 3384∗ 2 = 76801.5384∗ 7 = 26882001∗ 7 = 14007Dialogue-all308371.51040748309Through experiments, we find that the recognition effect after decision tree state bundling is improved to some extent compared with that before decision tree state bundling. The experimental results before and after decision tree state bundling are shown in Tables7 and 8.Table 7
Recognition results of decision tree state before extraction.
SubjectsSentence level recognition experimental resultsWord level recognition experimental results% CorrectHSN% CorrectACCHDSINMongol 116.3414373287584.278.34150883532479105017920Mongol 225.1417853070891.3384.421029717080777911274Mongol-all20.283211262158386.9580.69253855233286182929194Dialogue 140.9517572533429083.2472.96161244362811199119371Dialogue 243.5514931936342983.0473.92123992922240136214931Dialogue 336.579831705268880.6671.18112982782431132814007Dialogue-all40.67423361741040782.4372.743982110067482468148309Table 8
Recognition results of decision tree state bundling.
SubjectsSentence level recognition experimental resultsWord level recognition experimental results% CorrectHSN% CorrectAccHDSINMongol 116.5714573087584.8580.4915206422229278317920Mongol 228.2520050870890.786.11022517987051811274Mongol-all21.793451238158387.1182.65254316013162130129194Dialogue 143.2318552435429083.273.74161174612793183319371Dialogue 244.8415381891342982.7174.37123492932289124514931Dialogue 337.9510201668268880.7271.99113062782423122214007Dialogue-all42.4441359941040782.3373.433977210327505430048309


## 6.2. Identification of Experimental Results

The following conclusions can be drawn from the above experiments:(1)
In the experiment of invisible tritones, if invisible tritones are identified without decision tree state binding, the system will report an error. These invisible tritones can be identified effectively after state binding in the decision tree. This is because the invisible tritones to be recognized did not participate in the initial model training process, and the system could not recognize these tritones before the decision tree binding [24].(2)
In the experiment of sparse triton, the recognition effect after decision tree state binding is improved to some extent compared with that before decision tree state binding. The maximum improvement percentage of sentence recognition accuracy and word recognition accuracy reached 3.11% and 2.15%, respectively, and the average improvement percentage reached 1.65% and 1.22%, respectively. The comparison of sentence recognition accuracy before and after decision tree state bundling is shown in Figure4, and the comparison of word recognition accuracy before and after decision tree state bundling is shown in Figure 5.Figure 4
Comparison of sentence recognition accuracy before and after decision tree binding in sparse triton experiment.Figure 5
Comparison of word recognition accuracy before and after decision tree binding in sparse three-tone subexperiment.


## 7. Conclusion

In the past, in the study of speech acoustics, the acoustic vowel diagram was only viewed as a fixed vowel diagram or triangular vowel diagram, and the tongue position was described. At present, we find that the theory of the photoacoustic model can better explain that the Mongolian languages are close to each other and have homologous properties after the complete combination of photoacoustic vowel map and photoacoustic pattern map. In summary, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) Among the relatives of Mongolian languages (Mongolian, Dongxiang, Baoan, Tu, and Eastern Yugu), the vowel acoustic model has the property of linguistic genetic kinship. (2) In addition to the homology of language genesis, there is also the homology of language contact among the relatives of Mongolian languages. (3) By comparing the vowel acoustic models of Mongolian languages, it can be concluded that the vowel acoustic models of the Baoan language, Dongxiang language, and Tu language are the most similar, showing minimal differences and great similarities. Secondly, the acoustical model of Eastern Yugur is not as close as the acoustical model of other relative languages. The acoustical model of Mongolian presents a wider acoustical space than that of other relative languages, almost including other relative languages. We need to combine traditional linguistics and historical linguistics to explain the occurrence of this phenomenon.Although this article has solved the problem of building the Mongolian phonetic model for speech recognition, there are still many problems to be solved with the continuous expansion and deepening of the research field of speech recognition. In order to make the Mongolian language nonspecific, large vocabulary and the continuous speech recognition system are more perfect. Through experiments, it is found that the experimental results of sparse tritones show that the model has the highest recognition accuracy of 45% for sentences and 86% for words, which is more than 2% higher than before. But in the future, research should be mainly carried out in the following aspects: The establishment of a large vocabulary continuous speech recognition system requires a large corpus. The scale and quality of corpus are two important issues in the construction of corpus. The existing corpus has been strictly screened initially and some bad corpus has been removed. Therefore, some good corpus should be absorbed in the next step to expand the scale of the corpus. In this article, binary grammar and the word network are used as the underlying language model for recognition. Because this language model only considers the correlation between the current word and the previous word, it is not very restrictive to the search space. We should consider using more coherent language models, for example, the ternary model.



---

*Source: 1917350-2022-10-15.xml*