# Synthesis, Characterization, and Photocatalytic Activity of ZnO Nanomaterials Prepared by a Green, Nonchemical Route

Authors: Ngoc Thinh Nguyen; Van Anh Nguyen
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

An eco-friendly method for the synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles was studied. Zinc acetate precursor was thermally decomposed without adding any chemical agents. The synthesized materials were thoroughly characterized by various analytical tools. The results indicated that the synthesized ZnO nanomaterials have a wurtzite structure. The estimated crystallite sizes of the materials obtained at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C (named as ZnO-450, ZnO-550, ZnO-650, and ZnO-750) were 33, 36, 38, and 42 nm, respectively. The morphology of the nanomaterials was revealed to be affected by calcination temperature, causing the formation of both nanoparticles and nanorods with different sizes and shapes. The materials were applied as photocatalysts for methylene blue (MB) decomposition under ultraviolet (UV) light. Results showed that the decomposition efficiency strongly depends on UV illumination time, size, and morphology of ZnO nanomaterials. The highest MB decomposition (99.4%) is obtained when using ZnO-750. The photocatalytic decomposition follows the first-order reaction. The reaction rate constants corresponding to the MB decomposition process with the presence of ZnO-450, ZnO-550, ZnO-650, and ZnO-750 are 0.0512, 0.0636, 0.1077, and 0.1286 min-1, respectively.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Textile industry annually generates a huge amount of organic dyes, resulting in serious impacts on the environment. Therefore, the removal of organic dyes from textile wastewater is considered an essential need. Numerous different technologies have been applied to remove organic dyes in wastewater such as adsorption, coprecipitation, advanced oxidation process (AOP), ozonation, membrane filtration, and biological methods [1, 2]. AOP is noticeable because it could quickly remove various types of dyes. Among AOP techniques, the technique using heterogeneous photocatalytic catalyst is gaining attention as it can remove not only organic dyes but also other organic pollutants [1–5].It is widely known that ZnO is a semiconductor with broad band gap energy (3.3 eV) and n-type conductivity. In addition, it is very common in nature and environmentally friendly. That is the reason why ZnO is considered a very promising material for different applications such as making solar cells, photocatalysts, electrical equipment, and gas sensors [4]. In the recent years, researchers have focused on synthesizing nano-size ZnO materials for dye removal. ZnO nanomaterials can be synthesized by different methods including the sol-gel method [6], microwave method [7, 8], hydrothermal method [9, 10], precipitation method [11, 12], and thermal decomposition method [13–18]. Among these, thermal decomposition method is considering as an approach to “green method” that does not consume and/or generate toxic chemicals and/or solvents. Moreover, the method allows to prepare a huge amount of sample at one batch [13]. On the attempt to minimize generating toxic wastes, this study synthesized ZnO nanoparticles by thermal decomposition of zinc acetate. The materials were characterized and tested for photocatalytic activity.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Synthesis of ZnO Nanomaterials

The analytical grade zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(Ac)2·2H2O) was purchased from BDH (England) and directly used without further purification. The ZnO nanoparticles were prepared by thermal decomposition method [15, 16], with several modifications. The amount of 3 g zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(Ac)2·2H2O) was grinded in an agate mortar. The samples were then transferred to closed porcelain crucibles and left in an oven (Nabertherm, Germany) for thermal decomposition at 450°C, 550°C, 650°C, and 750°C within 4 hours with the temperature increasing rate of 10°C/min. The samples were allowed to cool down to room temperature and ground in the agate mortar to obtain final ZnO nanoparticles. Obtained products were named as ZnO-450, ZnO-550, ZnO-650, and ZnO-750 in accordance with the calcination temperatures of the samples.


### 2.2. Characterization Methods

The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns of the synthesized nanoparticles were provided using a Bruker D8 advanced X-ray diffractometer equipped with graphite monochromatized Cu Kα radiation (λ=1.5418Å), scanning rate of 0.02 s−1 and scanning range of 20–75°. The field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) characterization was performed on Hitachi S-4800 at 15 kV. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained with a JEOL JEM-1010 transmission electron microscope operating at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The thermal decomposition of zinc acetate dihydrate was studied by thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) (DSC131, LABSYS TG/DSC1600, TMA, and Setaram, France) to determine its thermal stability and decomposition temperature. The thermogravimetry (TG) curve of zinc acetate dihydrate was recorded in an air flow at the heating rate of 10°C/min from room temperature to 900°C. The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of the ZnO nanomaterials were recorded by the TriStar II 3020 nitrogen adsorption apparatus (Micromeritics Instruments, USA) at 77 K. The BET specific surface areas (SBET) of the samples were determined by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method.


### 2.3. Photocatalytic Study

The potential application of ZnO nanoparticles towards dye removal from wastewaters was evaluated in heterogeneous photocatalysis route. Methylene blue (MB) was used to test the photocatalytic efficiency of the ZnO nanoparticles. Photocatalytic reaction was carried out in a homemade photoreactor equipped with an Osram 250W, high-pressure mercury lamp as a source for UV radiation (Figure1). The reactor consists of a Pyrex glass beaker and a magnetic stirring. The lamp is positioned above the beaker. The distance between the lamp and the Pyrex glass beaker is 20 cm. The whole photocatalytic reactor is insulated in a box to prevent harmful radiation. For every batch experiment, 0.1 g of ZnO nanoparticles was dispersed in 100 mL aqueous solution of MB 10 mg/L. Prior to UV light illumination, the suspension was magnetically stirred in the dark for 30 min in order to obtain proper homogeneity of the mixture as well as to reach the absorption equilibrium. At definite time intervals, 4 mL of the mixture was collected and followed by centrifugation (Hettich Mikro 22R Centrifuges), at 5000 rpm for 10 min to remove the ZnO nanoparticles suspensions from the solution. Samples were finally analyzed by Agilent 8453 UV-vis spectrophotometer at the λmax of 664 nm wavelength. The percentage of photocatalytic degradation was calculated using the following equation:
(1)Percentagephotodegardation=A0−AA0×100.Figure 1
Photoreactor (1): high-pressure mercury lamp; (2): Pyrex glass beaker; (3): magnetic stirring.The rate constant of the degradation,k, was obtained from the first-order plot according to the equation: lnA0/A=kt, where A0 is the initial absorbance of dye and A is the absorbance of dye solution after UV light irradiation [19].


## 2.1. Synthesis of ZnO Nanomaterials

The analytical grade zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(Ac)2·2H2O) was purchased from BDH (England) and directly used without further purification. The ZnO nanoparticles were prepared by thermal decomposition method [15, 16], with several modifications. The amount of 3 g zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(Ac)2·2H2O) was grinded in an agate mortar. The samples were then transferred to closed porcelain crucibles and left in an oven (Nabertherm, Germany) for thermal decomposition at 450°C, 550°C, 650°C, and 750°C within 4 hours with the temperature increasing rate of 10°C/min. The samples were allowed to cool down to room temperature and ground in the agate mortar to obtain final ZnO nanoparticles. Obtained products were named as ZnO-450, ZnO-550, ZnO-650, and ZnO-750 in accordance with the calcination temperatures of the samples.


## 2.2. Characterization Methods

The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns of the synthesized nanoparticles were provided using a Bruker D8 advanced X-ray diffractometer equipped with graphite monochromatized Cu Kα radiation (λ=1.5418Å), scanning rate of 0.02 s−1 and scanning range of 20–75°. The field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) characterization was performed on Hitachi S-4800 at 15 kV. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained with a JEOL JEM-1010 transmission electron microscope operating at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The thermal decomposition of zinc acetate dihydrate was studied by thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) (DSC131, LABSYS TG/DSC1600, TMA, and Setaram, France) to determine its thermal stability and decomposition temperature. The thermogravimetry (TG) curve of zinc acetate dihydrate was recorded in an air flow at the heating rate of 10°C/min from room temperature to 900°C. The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of the ZnO nanomaterials were recorded by the TriStar II 3020 nitrogen adsorption apparatus (Micromeritics Instruments, USA) at 77 K. The BET specific surface areas (SBET) of the samples were determined by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method.


## 2.3. Photocatalytic Study

The potential application of ZnO nanoparticles towards dye removal from wastewaters was evaluated in heterogeneous photocatalysis route. Methylene blue (MB) was used to test the photocatalytic efficiency of the ZnO nanoparticles. Photocatalytic reaction was carried out in a homemade photoreactor equipped with an Osram 250W, high-pressure mercury lamp as a source for UV radiation (Figure1). The reactor consists of a Pyrex glass beaker and a magnetic stirring. The lamp is positioned above the beaker. The distance between the lamp and the Pyrex glass beaker is 20 cm. The whole photocatalytic reactor is insulated in a box to prevent harmful radiation. For every batch experiment, 0.1 g of ZnO nanoparticles was dispersed in 100 mL aqueous solution of MB 10 mg/L. Prior to UV light illumination, the suspension was magnetically stirred in the dark for 30 min in order to obtain proper homogeneity of the mixture as well as to reach the absorption equilibrium. At definite time intervals, 4 mL of the mixture was collected and followed by centrifugation (Hettich Mikro 22R Centrifuges), at 5000 rpm for 10 min to remove the ZnO nanoparticles suspensions from the solution. Samples were finally analyzed by Agilent 8453 UV-vis spectrophotometer at the λmax of 664 nm wavelength. The percentage of photocatalytic degradation was calculated using the following equation:
(1)Percentagephotodegardation=A0−AA0×100.Figure 1
Photoreactor (1): high-pressure mercury lamp; (2): Pyrex glass beaker; (3): magnetic stirring.The rate constant of the degradation,k, was obtained from the first-order plot according to the equation: lnA0/A=kt, where A0 is the initial absorbance of dye and A is the absorbance of dye solution after UV light irradiation [19].


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization of ZnO Nanoparticles

The TG and dTG (differential thermogravimetric) curves are provided in Figure2. The two-stage weight loss was observed. The first stage with approximately 15.72% of weight loss was presumed to be the thermal dehydration of zinc acetate dihydrate to form anhydrous zinc acetate. The second stage (47.58% of weight loss) within the temperature region from 250 to 350°C is accounted for the decomposition of anhydrous zinc acetate to form ZnO [15]. The weight loss was no longer observed within the temperature ranges from 350 to 900°C. This signaled the complete decomposition of the precursor at 350°C. Therefore, the calcination temperatures of 450°C, 550°C, 650°C, and 750°C were selected.Figure 2
TG-DTG curve of thermal decomposition of zinc acetate dihydrate at heating rate of 10°C in air.The XRD patterns of the prepared products are shown in Figure3. The major XRD peaks locate at angles (2θ) of 31.8°, 34.4°, 36.2°, 47.5°, 56.6°, 62.8°, 66.3°, 68.1°, and 69.3° corresponding to the (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), (200), (112), and (201) planes of ZnO, respectively. The standard diffraction peaks show the hexagonal wurtzite structure of ZnO with P63mc space group [10, 20]. None of the peaks for impurities was observed. Furthermore, strong intensity and narrow width of ZnO diffraction peaks suggest that the dominant phase of the product is hexagonal wurtzite structure [5, 10–12]. The X’Pert High Score was used to further interpret the XRD patterns. The characteristic peaks of the synthesized nanoparticles are completely identical to those from the JCPDS data (Card No. 36-1451) (Table 1) [20]. The crystallite size of the nanoparticles was calculated from the peak broadening of diffraction peaks using the Debye–Scherer formula D=kλ/βcosθ, where D is crystallite size, k is constant (0.89), λ=0.154nm represents the wavelength of X-ray radiation, β is the full width at half maximum of diffraction peaks (FWHM) in radian, and θ is Bragg’s angle [12]. The size of the crystallites of ZnO nanoparticles was evaluated by measuring the FWHM of the most intense peak (101). Approximately, the average crystallite size of ZnO-450 is 33 nm while those of ZnO-550, ZnO-650, and ZnO-750 are 36, 38, and 42 nm, respectively. The elevated surface energies at higher calcination temperatures may be responsible for the increasing of the crystallite size. Similar phenomenon was also reported in former studies [16].Figure 3
XRD patterns of the nanocrystalline ZnO samples thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C for 4 h.Table 1
Comparison between XRD results of ZnO nanoparticles and standard pattern for ZnO powder.
JCPDS (36-1451)ZnO-450ZnO-550ZnO-650ZnO-750hkl2θ%I2θ%IFWHM2θ%IFWHM2θ%IFWHM2θ%IFWHM10031.765731.79640.23631.79630.23631.79660.20731.79640.20700234.424434.46510.20734.47430.20734.43460.23634.43440.20710136.2510036.281000.26636.271000.24636.261000.23036.261000.20710247.532347.56200.26647.54170.32547.59200.23647.59190.23611056.603256.58280.23656.62280.32556.55270.20756.55270.29510362.862962.87220.35462.78160.23662.83210.26662.83200.20711267.962267.94170.41367.99180.20767.93170.41367.91170.35420169.091669.14100.36069.1090.41369.0890.23669.0590.207The lattice cell parameters (ɑ and c) of hexagonal wurtzite structure were calculated as follows [12]:
(2)c=λsinθ002,a=λ3sinθ100,1dhkl2=43h2+hk+k2a2+l2c2,where d is the interplanar distance; h, k, and l are the Miller indices of the plane; λ=1.54Å is the wavelength of the X-rays; and θ100 and θ002 are angles of the diffraction in degree corresponding to the planes 100 and 002. The volume (V) of the unit cells of hexagonal wurtzite structure was calculated in the following equation:
(3)V=0.866×a2×c.Results are listed in Table2. It was evident that the lattice parameter values of as-synthesized ZnO nanoparticles are similar to the standard values of ZnO.Table 2
Estimated structure parameters and average crystallite size of ZnO nanoparticles from the XRD data.
Samplesa (Å)c (Å)c/aVolume of unit cell (Å3)Size of the crystallites (nm)JCPDS 36-14513.2495.2051.60247.58xZnO-4503.2465.1991.60247.4433ZnO-5503.2465.1981.60147.4336ZnO-6503.2465.2031.60347.4838ZnO-7503.2465.2031.60347.4842The surface morphology and size of ZnO nanoparticles were imaged using the FESEM analysis (Figure4). Both sphere-like (diameters of 40-100 nm) and rod-like (diameters of 50-200 nm and lengths of 200-500 nm) ZnO nanoparticles were observed. Calcination temperatures seem to dramatically affect the morphology of the nanoparticles. At the temperature of 450°C, the rod-like particles are predominant. Nevertheless, more sphere-like particles are formed as increasing the temperatures. This is also confirmed by the transmission electron microscopic (TEM) analysis (Figure 5).Figure 4
FESEM images of the ZnO nanoparticles thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C.Figure 5
TEM images of the ZnO nanoparticles thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C.BET surface areas of ZnO-450, ZnO-550, ZnO-650, and ZnO-750 are 6.8, 4.8, 3.3, and 2.4 (m2/g), respectively (Table 3). The surface area of ZnO nanoparticles decreases when increasing the calcination temperature.Table 3
BET surface areas of ZnO nanoparticles thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C.
SampleSBET (m2/g)aZnO-4506.8ZnO-5504.8ZnO-6503.3ZnO-7502.4aBET surface area calculated from the linear part of the BET plot.


### 3.2. Photocatalytic Properties

Figure6 shows the absorption spectra of the degradation of MB under UV light with the presence of ZnO nanoparticles. Decrease in absorbance intensity at 664 nm clearly confirms that ZnO nanoparticles are acting as photocatalyst for the degradation of dye.Figure 6
UV-vis absorbance spectra of MB solution exposure to UV light in the presence of the ZnO nanoparticles thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C.The ZnO nanoparticles synthesized at higher temperatures tend to yield higher removal efficiencies. Figure7 shows that the best degradation efficiency can be achieved with the ZnO-650 and ZnO-750 (approximately 100% within 40 min). It is widely known that morphology, surface area, and crystallinity of a material are mainly responsible for its photocatalytic activity [21, 22]. When enhancing the surface area and crystallinity of the material, the photocatalytic activity will be improved. Nevertheless, while the crystallinity of the material increases, the surface area of the material decreases as raising calcination temperature (Figure 3 and Table 3). Therefore, morphology could act as a potential factor strongly influencing the final degradation efficiency. According to the results sphere-shaped ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO-650 and ZnO-750) show higher removal efficiency compared with the spindle-and rod-shaped ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO-450 and ZnO-550). Similar results were observed in Saravanan et al. [23].Figure 7
Percentage degradation of methylene blue dye vs. irradiation time in the presence of the ZnO nanoparticles thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C.The kinetic study for the degradation of MB was studied using the Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic model:lnA0/A=kt, where A0 is initial absorbance of dye, A is absorbance of dye solution after UV light irradiation, and k is a pseudo-first-order rate constant [19]. A plot of lnA0/A versus t is shown in Figure 8. Photocatalytic activity occurs because of the interaction of photocatalyst and UV irradiation that yields highly reactive hydroxyl radicals, which are believed to be the main species responsible for the oxidation. Other active species such as holes, free electrons, and superoxide could also act as oxidant species for the degradation of MB. The reaction process was proposed elsewhere in Qi et al. and numerous former studies [4, 19, 24, 25]. The Langmuir–Hinshelwood rate expression has been successfully used for heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation to determine the relationship between the initial degradation rate and the initial concentration of the organic substrate [1, 9].Figure 8
Kinetic plot oflnA0/A vs. irradiation time of the ZnO nanoparticles thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C.The linear plots and relatively highR2 values (Table 4) prove that the degradation of MB obeys the first-order reaction kinetics.Table 4
Rate constant for photo degradation of methylene blue dye.
SamplesRare (min-1)Adj.R2ZnO-4500.05120.9740ZnO-5500.06360.9984ZnO-6500.10770.9835ZnO-7500.12860.9990The removal efficiency of the synthesized ZnO nanoparticles was comparable with other materials in former studies (Table5). It can be concluded that the obtained materials have high potential to be applied for organic dye removal.Table 5
Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue with different ZnO nanomaterials under UV light catalyst methods.
CatalystMethods%removalDegradation rate (min-1)RefNanosized ZnOSol-gel99—[23]Precipitation98—[23]Thermal decomposition85—[23]ZnO nanoparticlesPrecipitation92.50.0124[26]ZnO nanospheresPolyol-method99.10.07432[27]Nitrogen doped ZnO nanoparticlesHydrothermal method99.6-0.0579[28]ZnO nanoparticlesThermal decomposition99.40.1286This studyStability and reusability of ZnO-750 were tested. Results show that the removal efficiency negligible decreases from 99.4% to 94.1% at the third cycle (Figure9). This suggests the good reuse performance of the material [29, 30].Figure 9
ZnO nanoparticle (ZnO-750) catalyst reusability degradation efficiency vs. cycle numbers under UV light irradiation 0 to 40 minutes.


## 3.1. Characterization of ZnO Nanoparticles

The TG and dTG (differential thermogravimetric) curves are provided in Figure2. The two-stage weight loss was observed. The first stage with approximately 15.72% of weight loss was presumed to be the thermal dehydration of zinc acetate dihydrate to form anhydrous zinc acetate. The second stage (47.58% of weight loss) within the temperature region from 250 to 350°C is accounted for the decomposition of anhydrous zinc acetate to form ZnO [15]. The weight loss was no longer observed within the temperature ranges from 350 to 900°C. This signaled the complete decomposition of the precursor at 350°C. Therefore, the calcination temperatures of 450°C, 550°C, 650°C, and 750°C were selected.Figure 2
TG-DTG curve of thermal decomposition of zinc acetate dihydrate at heating rate of 10°C in air.The XRD patterns of the prepared products are shown in Figure3. The major XRD peaks locate at angles (2θ) of 31.8°, 34.4°, 36.2°, 47.5°, 56.6°, 62.8°, 66.3°, 68.1°, and 69.3° corresponding to the (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), (200), (112), and (201) planes of ZnO, respectively. The standard diffraction peaks show the hexagonal wurtzite structure of ZnO with P63mc space group [10, 20]. None of the peaks for impurities was observed. Furthermore, strong intensity and narrow width of ZnO diffraction peaks suggest that the dominant phase of the product is hexagonal wurtzite structure [5, 10–12]. The X’Pert High Score was used to further interpret the XRD patterns. The characteristic peaks of the synthesized nanoparticles are completely identical to those from the JCPDS data (Card No. 36-1451) (Table 1) [20]. The crystallite size of the nanoparticles was calculated from the peak broadening of diffraction peaks using the Debye–Scherer formula D=kλ/βcosθ, where D is crystallite size, k is constant (0.89), λ=0.154nm represents the wavelength of X-ray radiation, β is the full width at half maximum of diffraction peaks (FWHM) in radian, and θ is Bragg’s angle [12]. The size of the crystallites of ZnO nanoparticles was evaluated by measuring the FWHM of the most intense peak (101). Approximately, the average crystallite size of ZnO-450 is 33 nm while those of ZnO-550, ZnO-650, and ZnO-750 are 36, 38, and 42 nm, respectively. The elevated surface energies at higher calcination temperatures may be responsible for the increasing of the crystallite size. Similar phenomenon was also reported in former studies [16].Figure 3
XRD patterns of the nanocrystalline ZnO samples thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C for 4 h.Table 1
Comparison between XRD results of ZnO nanoparticles and standard pattern for ZnO powder.
JCPDS (36-1451)ZnO-450ZnO-550ZnO-650ZnO-750hkl2θ%I2θ%IFWHM2θ%IFWHM2θ%IFWHM2θ%IFWHM10031.765731.79640.23631.79630.23631.79660.20731.79640.20700234.424434.46510.20734.47430.20734.43460.23634.43440.20710136.2510036.281000.26636.271000.24636.261000.23036.261000.20710247.532347.56200.26647.54170.32547.59200.23647.59190.23611056.603256.58280.23656.62280.32556.55270.20756.55270.29510362.862962.87220.35462.78160.23662.83210.26662.83200.20711267.962267.94170.41367.99180.20767.93170.41367.91170.35420169.091669.14100.36069.1090.41369.0890.23669.0590.207The lattice cell parameters (ɑ and c) of hexagonal wurtzite structure were calculated as follows [12]:
(2)c=λsinθ002,a=λ3sinθ100,1dhkl2=43h2+hk+k2a2+l2c2,where d is the interplanar distance; h, k, and l are the Miller indices of the plane; λ=1.54Å is the wavelength of the X-rays; and θ100 and θ002 are angles of the diffraction in degree corresponding to the planes 100 and 002. The volume (V) of the unit cells of hexagonal wurtzite structure was calculated in the following equation:
(3)V=0.866×a2×c.Results are listed in Table2. It was evident that the lattice parameter values of as-synthesized ZnO nanoparticles are similar to the standard values of ZnO.Table 2
Estimated structure parameters and average crystallite size of ZnO nanoparticles from the XRD data.
Samplesa (Å)c (Å)c/aVolume of unit cell (Å3)Size of the crystallites (nm)JCPDS 36-14513.2495.2051.60247.58xZnO-4503.2465.1991.60247.4433ZnO-5503.2465.1981.60147.4336ZnO-6503.2465.2031.60347.4838ZnO-7503.2465.2031.60347.4842The surface morphology and size of ZnO nanoparticles were imaged using the FESEM analysis (Figure4). Both sphere-like (diameters of 40-100 nm) and rod-like (diameters of 50-200 nm and lengths of 200-500 nm) ZnO nanoparticles were observed. Calcination temperatures seem to dramatically affect the morphology of the nanoparticles. At the temperature of 450°C, the rod-like particles are predominant. Nevertheless, more sphere-like particles are formed as increasing the temperatures. This is also confirmed by the transmission electron microscopic (TEM) analysis (Figure 5).Figure 4
FESEM images of the ZnO nanoparticles thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C.Figure 5
TEM images of the ZnO nanoparticles thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C.BET surface areas of ZnO-450, ZnO-550, ZnO-650, and ZnO-750 are 6.8, 4.8, 3.3, and 2.4 (m2/g), respectively (Table 3). The surface area of ZnO nanoparticles decreases when increasing the calcination temperature.Table 3
BET surface areas of ZnO nanoparticles thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C.
SampleSBET (m2/g)aZnO-4506.8ZnO-5504.8ZnO-6503.3ZnO-7502.4aBET surface area calculated from the linear part of the BET plot.


## 3.2. Photocatalytic Properties

Figure6 shows the absorption spectra of the degradation of MB under UV light with the presence of ZnO nanoparticles. Decrease in absorbance intensity at 664 nm clearly confirms that ZnO nanoparticles are acting as photocatalyst for the degradation of dye.Figure 6
UV-vis absorbance spectra of MB solution exposure to UV light in the presence of the ZnO nanoparticles thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C.The ZnO nanoparticles synthesized at higher temperatures tend to yield higher removal efficiencies. Figure7 shows that the best degradation efficiency can be achieved with the ZnO-650 and ZnO-750 (approximately 100% within 40 min). It is widely known that morphology, surface area, and crystallinity of a material are mainly responsible for its photocatalytic activity [21, 22]. When enhancing the surface area and crystallinity of the material, the photocatalytic activity will be improved. Nevertheless, while the crystallinity of the material increases, the surface area of the material decreases as raising calcination temperature (Figure 3 and Table 3). Therefore, morphology could act as a potential factor strongly influencing the final degradation efficiency. According to the results sphere-shaped ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO-650 and ZnO-750) show higher removal efficiency compared with the spindle-and rod-shaped ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO-450 and ZnO-550). Similar results were observed in Saravanan et al. [23].Figure 7
Percentage degradation of methylene blue dye vs. irradiation time in the presence of the ZnO nanoparticles thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C.The kinetic study for the degradation of MB was studied using the Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic model:lnA0/A=kt, where A0 is initial absorbance of dye, A is absorbance of dye solution after UV light irradiation, and k is a pseudo-first-order rate constant [19]. A plot of lnA0/A versus t is shown in Figure 8. Photocatalytic activity occurs because of the interaction of photocatalyst and UV irradiation that yields highly reactive hydroxyl radicals, which are believed to be the main species responsible for the oxidation. Other active species such as holes, free electrons, and superoxide could also act as oxidant species for the degradation of MB. The reaction process was proposed elsewhere in Qi et al. and numerous former studies [4, 19, 24, 25]. The Langmuir–Hinshelwood rate expression has been successfully used for heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation to determine the relationship between the initial degradation rate and the initial concentration of the organic substrate [1, 9].Figure 8
Kinetic plot oflnA0/A vs. irradiation time of the ZnO nanoparticles thermally decomposed at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C.The linear plots and relatively highR2 values (Table 4) prove that the degradation of MB obeys the first-order reaction kinetics.Table 4
Rate constant for photo degradation of methylene blue dye.
SamplesRare (min-1)Adj.R2ZnO-4500.05120.9740ZnO-5500.06360.9984ZnO-6500.10770.9835ZnO-7500.12860.9990The removal efficiency of the synthesized ZnO nanoparticles was comparable with other materials in former studies (Table5). It can be concluded that the obtained materials have high potential to be applied for organic dye removal.Table 5
Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue with different ZnO nanomaterials under UV light catalyst methods.
CatalystMethods%removalDegradation rate (min-1)RefNanosized ZnOSol-gel99—[23]Precipitation98—[23]Thermal decomposition85—[23]ZnO nanoparticlesPrecipitation92.50.0124[26]ZnO nanospheresPolyol-method99.10.07432[27]Nitrogen doped ZnO nanoparticlesHydrothermal method99.6-0.0579[28]ZnO nanoparticlesThermal decomposition99.40.1286This studyStability and reusability of ZnO-750 were tested. Results show that the removal efficiency negligible decreases from 99.4% to 94.1% at the third cycle (Figure9). This suggests the good reuse performance of the material [29, 30].Figure 9
ZnO nanoparticle (ZnO-750) catalyst reusability degradation efficiency vs. cycle numbers under UV light irradiation 0 to 40 minutes.


## 4. Conclusions

ZnO nanomaterials were successfully generated by a green method, thermal decomposition of zinc acetate precursor at 450, 550, 650, and 750°C. Results reveals a wurtzite hexagonal structure of ZnO-450, ZnO-550, ZnO-650, and ZnO-750 with the crystal sizes of 33, 36, 38, and 42 nm, respectively. The material morphology changes from the rod-like shapes to the sphere-like shapes when increasing decomposition temperature.ZnO nanomaterials were applied as photocatalyst to decompose MB under UV light. The ability to decompose MB depends on the UV illumination time, the size, and morphology of ZnO nanomaterials. The highest MB decomposition is obtained with the ZnO-750. More than 99% of the dye was removed after 40 minutes. Photocatalytic decomposition process of methylene blue follows the first-order reaction. The reaction rate constants corresponding to the removal process of ZnO-450, ZnO-550, ZnO-650, and ZnO-750 are 0.0512, 0.0636, 0.1077, and 0.1286 min-1, respectively.



---

*Source: 1768371-2020-10-01.xml*