# Estimation of Abamectin Residues Present in Tea: High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Technique

Authors: Madasamy Kottiappan; Shanmugaselvan Veilumuthu Anandhan; Selvaganapathi Chandran
Journal: ISRN Chromatography
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

A simple, reliable, and sensitive method was based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was developed and validated for the estimation of abamectin residues present in tea. The abamectin residues extracted with acetone-water mixture (70 : 30, v/v) and derivatised with 1-methylimidazole (1-MIM) and trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) were estimated by HPLC using fluorescence detector (FLD). The technique was validated in terms of linearity, precision, recovery, specificity, limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantification (LOQ). A good linear relationship (r2>0.99) was absorbed in the abamectin concentration range from 0.01 to 1.0 μg mL−1. The limit of detection and limit of quantification of the method were 0.01 and 0.02 μg g−1, respectively. The average recoveries of the pesticide from black tea and dried green leaves ranged from 83.3 to 103.8% and 83.8 to 98.0%, respectively.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Tea, one of the oldest and most popular beverages in the world, is obtained from the tender leaves of the plantCamellia sinensis(L).O. Kuntze. South India, a major contributor to the global production of tea, continues to be the leader in national tea production contributing about 25% in toto and has the largest domestic market [1]. In order to improve the productivity and protect the tea plants from the harmful pests like mite, the acaricides are being applied on the canopy and/or tea bushes being with chemical spray. As a result, residue level of the acaricide present in the consumable tea is of considerable importance. Therefore, development of a highly reliable method is critical for the estimation of the acaricide residues present in tea.Abamectin, which belongs to the macrocyclic lactone class of avermectins, is composed of at least 80% of avermectin B1a and less than 20% of avermectin B1b (Figure 1), is produced by the actinomycetes (Streptomyces avermitilis) [2]. Because of its high toxicity to agricultural pests abamectin is widely used to control insects and mites in tea, vegetables, and fruits [3]. Abamectin present in various biological matrices including animal tissues, serum, fruits, and vegetables can be successfully determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in the reverse phase mode, coupled with different detectors, namely,ultraviolet detection (UVD), fluorescence detection (FLD), and mass spectrometry (MS) [3–5]. However, there is no report in the literature on the methodology for the determination of abamectin residues present in tea. Since the concentration of abamectin residues is very low, the UVD is less sensitive than FLD in determining the residues of abamectin closer to EU MRL values (0.02 μg g−1) for tea and MS is inaccessible for most of routine laboratories due to its high cost. A new analytical method has been attempted for the determination of abamectin present in tea. The method has been developed not only to achieve high sensitivity but also to provide reliability of determination and readiness for the routine analysis of abamectin residues present in tea.Figure 1
Structure of abamectin.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Technical standard (purity: 98.7%) of abamectin was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Bangalore, India). Analytical grades of acetone, dichloromethane, sodium chloride, and anhydrous sodium sulphate and HPLC grade of acetonitrile were purchased from M/s. Ranbaxy chemicals, New Delhi. Florisil (60–100 mesh) was purchased from M/s. Sisco Research Laboratories, Mumbai. A rotary mechanical shaker (REMI RS 36), a rotary vacuum evaporator (Labserve Super fit PBU6), millipore (Millipore Direct Q3 smart), sonicator, and glass column (20 mm dia, 590 mm length) were also used in the present study.


### 2.2. Preparation of Tea Samples

About 3 kg of green tea shoots (two leaves and a bud) were harvested from the field, half of the quantity was dried in shade for about a week and the remaining quantity was processed in the minimanufacturing unit, using the conventional CTC (Crush, Tear, and Curl) tea manufacturing process. The manufacturing process, in brief, involved withering of shoots (50–55% water loss) at ambient temperature for 15–20 h, rolling using a rotorvane for about 15 min with pressure, followed by fermentation (oxidation for 1-2 h at 25–30°C and 95% RH), and drying in a dryer, using hot air at100±5°C. The final moisture content of tea was 2-3%. The matrices used for the study were the dried green leaves and black tea.


### 2.3. Standard Solution

A stock solution of abamectin of concentration 1000μg mL−1 was made in acetonitrile. Working solutions of concentrations in the range 0.01–1.0 μg mL−1 were prepared by dilution in series of the stock solution with acetonitrile. The standards were stored at −20°C and protected from light.


### 2.4. Sample Preparation

#### 2.4.1. Fortification

Prior to extraction, 10 g of homogenized samples of black tea/dried green leaves were spiked by adding the standard solution to give fortification levels of 0.02 and 0.2μg g−1. To ensure good contact of the analytes with the whole sample, the mixture was equilibrated by shaking for 10 min and then left for three hours.


#### 2.4.2. Extraction and Cleanup

Ten gram of black tea/dried green leaves sample were extracted with 200 mL of acetone- water mixture (70 : 30, v/v) thrice by shaking it in a mechanical shaker for 2 hours [3]. The contents were filtered and collected. The pooled extract was partitioned with 100 mL of dichloromethane (DCM) and lower organic layer was collected in a 500 mL round bottomed flask (RBF) through anhydrous sodium sulphate. To the separate funnel containing aqueous layer, 50 mL of saturated NaCl solution and 50 mL of DCM were added and shaken vigorously. Again the lower organic layer was collected through anhydrous sodium sulphate in the RBF. The above process was repeated with another 50 mL of DCM. The combined DCM extracts were evaporated to dryness. The concentrated residue is reconstituted with 10 mL of DCM and transferred to a glass column packed with activated florisil (10 g) guarded with 1 cm of anhydrous sodium sulfate. Prior to elution, the column was washed with 50 mL of DCM to remove the coextractives and eluted with 150 mL of 2 : 1 acetone-chloroform mixture. The collected elute was concentrated to dryness.


#### 2.4.3. Precolumn Fluorescence Derivatization

The residue was reconstituted with 5.0 mL of acetonitrile and 1.0 mL of this solution was transferred into a 5 mL test tube. Then 0.5 mL of 1-methylimidazole-acetonitrile (1 : 1, v/v) and 0.5 mL of trifluoroacetic anhydride-acetonitrile (1 : 2, v/v) mixture were added to the test tube. The test tube was incubated at 60°C for 3 hours. After incubation the residue was determined by HPLC with fluorescence detector.


### 2.5. HPLC-FLD Analysis

Chromatographic analysis was performed using Agilent 1100 series (Chemstations) equipped with fluorescence detector. The chromatographic separation was performed on a Zorbax Rx C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm × 5μm) column, with a guard column (20 mm × 4.6 mm id, 5 μm). The mobile phase acetonitrile-water mixture (95 : 5, v/v) was prefiltered through a 0.22 μm filter and the flow rate was kept at 1.0 mL min−1. The excitation and emission wavelengths of the fluorescence detector were set at 365 and 470 nm, respectively, and the time constant was set to 2 s. A volume of 50 μL was injected for each analysis and HPLC column temperature was kept at 40°C. The data were stored and evaluated using LC solution software (Agilent). Under the above conditions, the retention time of the abamectin was found to be 11.372 min (Figure 2).Figure 2
HPLC chromatogram of abamectin (reference).


## 2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Technical standard (purity: 98.7%) of abamectin was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Bangalore, India). Analytical grades of acetone, dichloromethane, sodium chloride, and anhydrous sodium sulphate and HPLC grade of acetonitrile were purchased from M/s. Ranbaxy chemicals, New Delhi. Florisil (60–100 mesh) was purchased from M/s. Sisco Research Laboratories, Mumbai. A rotary mechanical shaker (REMI RS 36), a rotary vacuum evaporator (Labserve Super fit PBU6), millipore (Millipore Direct Q3 smart), sonicator, and glass column (20 mm dia, 590 mm length) were also used in the present study.


## 2.2. Preparation of Tea Samples

About 3 kg of green tea shoots (two leaves and a bud) were harvested from the field, half of the quantity was dried in shade for about a week and the remaining quantity was processed in the minimanufacturing unit, using the conventional CTC (Crush, Tear, and Curl) tea manufacturing process. The manufacturing process, in brief, involved withering of shoots (50–55% water loss) at ambient temperature for 15–20 h, rolling using a rotorvane for about 15 min with pressure, followed by fermentation (oxidation for 1-2 h at 25–30°C and 95% RH), and drying in a dryer, using hot air at100±5°C. The final moisture content of tea was 2-3%. The matrices used for the study were the dried green leaves and black tea.


## 2.3. Standard Solution

A stock solution of abamectin of concentration 1000μg mL−1 was made in acetonitrile. Working solutions of concentrations in the range 0.01–1.0 μg mL−1 were prepared by dilution in series of the stock solution with acetonitrile. The standards were stored at −20°C and protected from light.


## 2.4. Sample Preparation

### 2.4.1. Fortification

Prior to extraction, 10 g of homogenized samples of black tea/dried green leaves were spiked by adding the standard solution to give fortification levels of 0.02 and 0.2μg g−1. To ensure good contact of the analytes with the whole sample, the mixture was equilibrated by shaking for 10 min and then left for three hours.


### 2.4.2. Extraction and Cleanup

Ten gram of black tea/dried green leaves sample were extracted with 200 mL of acetone- water mixture (70 : 30, v/v) thrice by shaking it in a mechanical shaker for 2 hours [3]. The contents were filtered and collected. The pooled extract was partitioned with 100 mL of dichloromethane (DCM) and lower organic layer was collected in a 500 mL round bottomed flask (RBF) through anhydrous sodium sulphate. To the separate funnel containing aqueous layer, 50 mL of saturated NaCl solution and 50 mL of DCM were added and shaken vigorously. Again the lower organic layer was collected through anhydrous sodium sulphate in the RBF. The above process was repeated with another 50 mL of DCM. The combined DCM extracts were evaporated to dryness. The concentrated residue is reconstituted with 10 mL of DCM and transferred to a glass column packed with activated florisil (10 g) guarded with 1 cm of anhydrous sodium sulfate. Prior to elution, the column was washed with 50 mL of DCM to remove the coextractives and eluted with 150 mL of 2 : 1 acetone-chloroform mixture. The collected elute was concentrated to dryness.


### 2.4.3. Precolumn Fluorescence Derivatization

The residue was reconstituted with 5.0 mL of acetonitrile and 1.0 mL of this solution was transferred into a 5 mL test tube. Then 0.5 mL of 1-methylimidazole-acetonitrile (1 : 1, v/v) and 0.5 mL of trifluoroacetic anhydride-acetonitrile (1 : 2, v/v) mixture were added to the test tube. The test tube was incubated at 60°C for 3 hours. After incubation the residue was determined by HPLC with fluorescence detector.


## 2.4.1. Fortification

Prior to extraction, 10 g of homogenized samples of black tea/dried green leaves were spiked by adding the standard solution to give fortification levels of 0.02 and 0.2μg g−1. To ensure good contact of the analytes with the whole sample, the mixture was equilibrated by shaking for 10 min and then left for three hours.


## 2.4.2. Extraction and Cleanup

Ten gram of black tea/dried green leaves sample were extracted with 200 mL of acetone- water mixture (70 : 30, v/v) thrice by shaking it in a mechanical shaker for 2 hours [3]. The contents were filtered and collected. The pooled extract was partitioned with 100 mL of dichloromethane (DCM) and lower organic layer was collected in a 500 mL round bottomed flask (RBF) through anhydrous sodium sulphate. To the separate funnel containing aqueous layer, 50 mL of saturated NaCl solution and 50 mL of DCM were added and shaken vigorously. Again the lower organic layer was collected through anhydrous sodium sulphate in the RBF. The above process was repeated with another 50 mL of DCM. The combined DCM extracts were evaporated to dryness. The concentrated residue is reconstituted with 10 mL of DCM and transferred to a glass column packed with activated florisil (10 g) guarded with 1 cm of anhydrous sodium sulfate. Prior to elution, the column was washed with 50 mL of DCM to remove the coextractives and eluted with 150 mL of 2 : 1 acetone-chloroform mixture. The collected elute was concentrated to dryness.


## 2.4.3. Precolumn Fluorescence Derivatization

The residue was reconstituted with 5.0 mL of acetonitrile and 1.0 mL of this solution was transferred into a 5 mL test tube. Then 0.5 mL of 1-methylimidazole-acetonitrile (1 : 1, v/v) and 0.5 mL of trifluoroacetic anhydride-acetonitrile (1 : 2, v/v) mixture were added to the test tube. The test tube was incubated at 60°C for 3 hours. After incubation the residue was determined by HPLC with fluorescence detector.


## 2.5. HPLC-FLD Analysis

Chromatographic analysis was performed using Agilent 1100 series (Chemstations) equipped with fluorescence detector. The chromatographic separation was performed on a Zorbax Rx C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm × 5μm) column, with a guard column (20 mm × 4.6 mm id, 5 μm). The mobile phase acetonitrile-water mixture (95 : 5, v/v) was prefiltered through a 0.22 μm filter and the flow rate was kept at 1.0 mL min−1. The excitation and emission wavelengths of the fluorescence detector were set at 365 and 470 nm, respectively, and the time constant was set to 2 s. A volume of 50 μL was injected for each analysis and HPLC column temperature was kept at 40°C. The data were stored and evaluated using LC solution software (Agilent). Under the above conditions, the retention time of the abamectin was found to be 11.372 min (Figure 2).Figure 2
HPLC chromatogram of abamectin (reference).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Optimization of Extraction Procedure

Various solvents, including acetonitrile [6], acetone [7], and the mixture of acetonitrile and hexane [8], have been extensively used for extracting abamectin residues from various samples. But in the present study, acetonitrile-water (70 : 30, v/v), methanol-water (70 : 30, v/v), and acetone-water (70 : 30, v/v) mixtures are used as solvents for the extraction of spiked samples of tea (0.02 and 0.2 μg g−1 fortification level). The efficiency in percentage of the extraction of abamectin by various extraction techniques mentioned above (Table 1), the best recoveries are achieved using acetone-water (70 : 30, v/v) [9].Table 1
Optimization of various extract solvents*.
Spiked levelsμg g−1
Tea
Acetonitrile-water (70 : 30, v/v)
Acetone-water(70 : 30, v/v)
Methanol-water(70 : 30, v/v)
0.02
Black tea
49.70 ± 3.81
86.40 ± 1.43
57.07 ± 3.51
Dried green leaves
51.60 ± 3.76
89.03 ± 1.68
57.42 ± 4.48
0.2
Black tea
55.38 ± 4.48
88.22 ± 1.53
66.45 ± 5.24
Dried green leaves
54.79 ± 3.62
91.04 ± 1.87
67.79 ± 4.41
*Mean of triplicate analysis ± SD.


### 3.2. Optimization of Clean-Up Procedure

The residues after concentration are subjected to column clean-up with different adsorbents to optimize the cleanup procedures. Chromatographic columns (glass, 60 × 1.5 cm id) with 10 g of different adsorbents like neutral alumina, florisil, and silica gel guarded with 1 cm anhydrous sodium sulphate are employed. Each column is prewashed with 30 mL of DCM. The concentrate obtained is dissolved in 5 mL of DCM and transferred to the column. The column is eluted with 150 mL of acetone and chloroform (1 : 1, v/v) mixture. The final elute from each column is concentrated to dryness using a rotary evaporator. Each cleanup is performed in triplicate with a control for each set. From the results (Table2), it is evident that florisil guarded with anhydrous sodium sulphate is an appropriate adsorbent for clean-up process in the quantification of abamectin residues present in tea.Table 2
Optimization of various adsorbents*.
Spiked levelsμg g−1
Tea
Florisil
Neutral alumina
Silica gel
0.02
Black tea
86.40 ± 1.43
—
—
Dried green leaves
89.03 ± 1.68
—
—
0.2
Black tea
88.22 ± 1.53
16.67 ± 3.45
6.24 ± 3.37
Dried green leaves
91.04 ± 1.87
17.05 ± 1.85
7.51 ± 1.29
*Mean of triplicate analysis ± SD.


### 3.3. Optimization of Fluorescence Derivatization Procedure

A combination of trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) and 1-methylimidazole (1-MIM) cited in the literature is chosen as the derivatizing reagents in this study also. This derivatizing reagents could react rapidly with compound and form a strong stable fluorescent derivative. However, data about the optimal experimental conditions are rather inconsistent in the literatures. The main factors affecting the derivatization are incubation time, temperature, and light [3]. Sher et al. studied the derivatives of abamectin, doramectin, moxidectin and ivermectin at 60°C increased compared with 25°C in dark condition [10]. The effect of the incubation time on derivatization is investigated by incubating the samples at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 h at 60°C in dark. The recovery of abamectin residues is found to be high at 3.0 hours of incubation time at 60°C in dark (Figure 3).Figure 3
Optimization of fluorescence derivatization.


### 3.4. Method Validation

The developed analytical method is validated for linearity, precision, recovery, specificity, LOD, and LOQ as per SANCO guidelines.


#### 3.4.1. Linearity

Calibration curve is constructed by performing a linear regressive analysis with the chromatographic peak area versus the concentration of abamectin (0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 1.0μg mL−1). Each concentration is injected in five replicates. The calibration curve shows excellent linear relationship with a mean correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.9971.


#### 3.4.2. Limit of Detection

Different standards of decreasing concentration are prepared and injected in succession. The detected concentration by the instrument with S/N at 3 : 1 ratio is taken as the limit of detection and it is estimated as 0.01μg g−1 of abamectin.


#### 3.4.3. Precision

The repeatability of the instrument is determined by injecting the standard solution (0.3μg L−1) five times and the RSD value for the peak areas is found to be 0.92%.


#### 3.4.4. Specificity

There is no interference between the components of solvent used for the preparation of reference standard, mobile phase, test substance, and blank extract from the matrix (chromatogram presented in Figures2 and 4). Thus the specificity of the method is established for the analyte.Figure 4
HPLC chromatogram for blank tea sample.


#### 3.4.5. Recovery

Recovery studies in black tea/dried green leaves are conducted by fortifying the control samples at different concentrations, namely, 0.02, 0.2, and 2.0μg g−1 with abamectin standard solution. The samples are extracted with acetone-water mixture (70 : 30, v/v), partitioned, cleaned up, and analyzed for abamectin content as described above. The recovery percentage ranges from 86.5 to 103.8% and 92.7 to 98.0% for black tea and dried green leaves, respectively (Table 3). This indicates that the extraction with acetone-water (70 : 30, v/v) mixture is able to extract analytes from samples completely and the analyte loss is negligible during the whole analytical procedure (Figure 5).Table 3
Recovery study for black tea and dried green leaves using acetone-water mixture (70 : 30, v/v)*.
Sample
Spiked level (μg g−1)
Recovery %
RSD %
Black tea
0.02
86.50
1.93
0.2
88.69
1.61
2.0
103.84
0.49
Dried green leaves
0.02
98.00
1.07
0.2
92.78
1.22
2.0
93.19
1.14
*Mean of triplicate analysis ± SD.Figure 5
HPLC chromatogram for blank tea sample spiked at 0.2μg g−1.


#### 3.4.6. Limit of Quantification

The detected concentration by the instrument with S/N at 10 : 1 ratio is taken as the limit of quantification and it is estimated to be 0.02μg g−1.


## 3.1. Optimization of Extraction Procedure

Various solvents, including acetonitrile [6], acetone [7], and the mixture of acetonitrile and hexane [8], have been extensively used for extracting abamectin residues from various samples. But in the present study, acetonitrile-water (70 : 30, v/v), methanol-water (70 : 30, v/v), and acetone-water (70 : 30, v/v) mixtures are used as solvents for the extraction of spiked samples of tea (0.02 and 0.2 μg g−1 fortification level). The efficiency in percentage of the extraction of abamectin by various extraction techniques mentioned above (Table 1), the best recoveries are achieved using acetone-water (70 : 30, v/v) [9].Table 1
Optimization of various extract solvents*.
Spiked levelsμg g−1
Tea
Acetonitrile-water (70 : 30, v/v)
Acetone-water(70 : 30, v/v)
Methanol-water(70 : 30, v/v)
0.02
Black tea
49.70 ± 3.81
86.40 ± 1.43
57.07 ± 3.51
Dried green leaves
51.60 ± 3.76
89.03 ± 1.68
57.42 ± 4.48
0.2
Black tea
55.38 ± 4.48
88.22 ± 1.53
66.45 ± 5.24
Dried green leaves
54.79 ± 3.62
91.04 ± 1.87
67.79 ± 4.41
*Mean of triplicate analysis ± SD.


## 3.2. Optimization of Clean-Up Procedure

The residues after concentration are subjected to column clean-up with different adsorbents to optimize the cleanup procedures. Chromatographic columns (glass, 60 × 1.5 cm id) with 10 g of different adsorbents like neutral alumina, florisil, and silica gel guarded with 1 cm anhydrous sodium sulphate are employed. Each column is prewashed with 30 mL of DCM. The concentrate obtained is dissolved in 5 mL of DCM and transferred to the column. The column is eluted with 150 mL of acetone and chloroform (1 : 1, v/v) mixture. The final elute from each column is concentrated to dryness using a rotary evaporator. Each cleanup is performed in triplicate with a control for each set. From the results (Table2), it is evident that florisil guarded with anhydrous sodium sulphate is an appropriate adsorbent for clean-up process in the quantification of abamectin residues present in tea.Table 2
Optimization of various adsorbents*.
Spiked levelsμg g−1
Tea
Florisil
Neutral alumina
Silica gel
0.02
Black tea
86.40 ± 1.43
—
—
Dried green leaves
89.03 ± 1.68
—
—
0.2
Black tea
88.22 ± 1.53
16.67 ± 3.45
6.24 ± 3.37
Dried green leaves
91.04 ± 1.87
17.05 ± 1.85
7.51 ± 1.29
*Mean of triplicate analysis ± SD.


## 3.3. Optimization of Fluorescence Derivatization Procedure

A combination of trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) and 1-methylimidazole (1-MIM) cited in the literature is chosen as the derivatizing reagents in this study also. This derivatizing reagents could react rapidly with compound and form a strong stable fluorescent derivative. However, data about the optimal experimental conditions are rather inconsistent in the literatures. The main factors affecting the derivatization are incubation time, temperature, and light [3]. Sher et al. studied the derivatives of abamectin, doramectin, moxidectin and ivermectin at 60°C increased compared with 25°C in dark condition [10]. The effect of the incubation time on derivatization is investigated by incubating the samples at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 h at 60°C in dark. The recovery of abamectin residues is found to be high at 3.0 hours of incubation time at 60°C in dark (Figure 3).Figure 3
Optimization of fluorescence derivatization.


## 3.4. Method Validation

The developed analytical method is validated for linearity, precision, recovery, specificity, LOD, and LOQ as per SANCO guidelines.


### 3.4.1. Linearity

Calibration curve is constructed by performing a linear regressive analysis with the chromatographic peak area versus the concentration of abamectin (0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 1.0μg mL−1). Each concentration is injected in five replicates. The calibration curve shows excellent linear relationship with a mean correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.9971.


### 3.4.2. Limit of Detection

Different standards of decreasing concentration are prepared and injected in succession. The detected concentration by the instrument with S/N at 3 : 1 ratio is taken as the limit of detection and it is estimated as 0.01μg g−1 of abamectin.


### 3.4.3. Precision

The repeatability of the instrument is determined by injecting the standard solution (0.3μg L−1) five times and the RSD value for the peak areas is found to be 0.92%.


### 3.4.4. Specificity

There is no interference between the components of solvent used for the preparation of reference standard, mobile phase, test substance, and blank extract from the matrix (chromatogram presented in Figures2 and 4). Thus the specificity of the method is established for the analyte.Figure 4
HPLC chromatogram for blank tea sample.


### 3.4.5. Recovery

Recovery studies in black tea/dried green leaves are conducted by fortifying the control samples at different concentrations, namely, 0.02, 0.2, and 2.0μg g−1 with abamectin standard solution. The samples are extracted with acetone-water mixture (70 : 30, v/v), partitioned, cleaned up, and analyzed for abamectin content as described above. The recovery percentage ranges from 86.5 to 103.8% and 92.7 to 98.0% for black tea and dried green leaves, respectively (Table 3). This indicates that the extraction with acetone-water (70 : 30, v/v) mixture is able to extract analytes from samples completely and the analyte loss is negligible during the whole analytical procedure (Figure 5).Table 3
Recovery study for black tea and dried green leaves using acetone-water mixture (70 : 30, v/v)*.
Sample
Spiked level (μg g−1)
Recovery %
RSD %
Black tea
0.02
86.50
1.93
0.2
88.69
1.61
2.0
103.84
0.49
Dried green leaves
0.02
98.00
1.07
0.2
92.78
1.22
2.0
93.19
1.14
*Mean of triplicate analysis ± SD.Figure 5
HPLC chromatogram for blank tea sample spiked at 0.2μg g−1.


### 3.4.6. Limit of Quantification

The detected concentration by the instrument with S/N at 10 : 1 ratio is taken as the limit of quantification and it is estimated to be 0.02μg g−1.


## 3.4.1. Linearity

Calibration curve is constructed by performing a linear regressive analysis with the chromatographic peak area versus the concentration of abamectin (0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 1.0μg mL−1). Each concentration is injected in five replicates. The calibration curve shows excellent linear relationship with a mean correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.9971.


## 3.4.2. Limit of Detection

Different standards of decreasing concentration are prepared and injected in succession. The detected concentration by the instrument with S/N at 3 : 1 ratio is taken as the limit of detection and it is estimated as 0.01μg g−1 of abamectin.


## 3.4.3. Precision

The repeatability of the instrument is determined by injecting the standard solution (0.3μg L−1) five times and the RSD value for the peak areas is found to be 0.92%.


## 3.4.4. Specificity

There is no interference between the components of solvent used for the preparation of reference standard, mobile phase, test substance, and blank extract from the matrix (chromatogram presented in Figures2 and 4). Thus the specificity of the method is established for the analyte.Figure 4
HPLC chromatogram for blank tea sample.


## 3.4.5. Recovery

Recovery studies in black tea/dried green leaves are conducted by fortifying the control samples at different concentrations, namely, 0.02, 0.2, and 2.0μg g−1 with abamectin standard solution. The samples are extracted with acetone-water mixture (70 : 30, v/v), partitioned, cleaned up, and analyzed for abamectin content as described above. The recovery percentage ranges from 86.5 to 103.8% and 92.7 to 98.0% for black tea and dried green leaves, respectively (Table 3). This indicates that the extraction with acetone-water (70 : 30, v/v) mixture is able to extract analytes from samples completely and the analyte loss is negligible during the whole analytical procedure (Figure 5).Table 3
Recovery study for black tea and dried green leaves using acetone-water mixture (70 : 30, v/v)*.
Sample
Spiked level (μg g−1)
Recovery %
RSD %
Black tea
0.02
86.50
1.93
0.2
88.69
1.61
2.0
103.84
0.49
Dried green leaves
0.02
98.00
1.07
0.2
92.78
1.22
2.0
93.19
1.14
*Mean of triplicate analysis ± SD.Figure 5
HPLC chromatogram for blank tea sample spiked at 0.2μg g−1.


## 3.4.6. Limit of Quantification

The detected concentration by the instrument with S/N at 10 : 1 ratio is taken as the limit of quantification and it is estimated to be 0.02μg g−1.


## 4. Conclusion

Study on the determination of abamectin residues present in the tea based on HPLC technique reveals the following conclusion. Good recovery was achieved with the extraction mixture of acetone-water (70 : 30, v/v), next separation with florisil adsorbent, and a fine fluorescent derivatisation with 3-hour incubation at 60°C in dark. The optimized conditions are good enough to detect up to 0.02μg g−1 (EU MRL) of abamectin residues present in different varieties of tea.



---

*Source: 183654-2013-04-18.xml*