# Pyrolysis Characteristics and Kinetic Analysis of Sediment from the Dianchi Lake in China

Authors: Zhenfen Wu; Huilong Luo
Journal: International Journal of Chemical Engineering
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Pyrolysis properties and kinetic analysis of lake sediment, as well as evolution characteristics of the gaseous products at 5°C/min, 10°C/min, and 20°C/min, were investigated by TG-FTIR. Comparison to the TG and DTG curves at different heating rates, the pyrolysis process at 10°C/min could describe the sediment pyrolysis characteristics better than at 5°C/min and 20°C/min; thus the process of sediment pyrolysis could be considered as four stages. From the kinetics analysis, the nth-order chemical reaction model was suitable to describe the sediment pyrolysis reaction well. The values of n were within 2.55–3.42 and activation energyE was ranged from 15.83 KJ/mol to 57.92 KJ/mol at different heating rates. The gaseous products of H2O, CO2, CO, CH4, and SO2 and several functional groups (C-H, C=O, and C-O) could be found from the IR spectrum. From the evolution characteristics with the temperature, there were two evolution peaks for CO2 and one peak for CH4 and SO2. However, the evolution of CO always increased. Besides, the evolution peak for CO2, CH4, and SO2 all shifted to the low temperature region with the decrease of heating rate. The results could provide theoretical basis for harmless treatment and resource utilization of lake sediment.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Lake sediment is the migration and transformation carrier of a large number of organic pollutants in the environment, which can be regarded as the second pollution source of water [1]. In order to improve the water quality of lake, sediment dredging is considered as an important mean of water pollution control [2]. The first large-scale lake dredging project in China was Dianchi sediment dredging project in 1998; so far, the lake sediment has been dredged about 14.94 million m3 [3]. The treatment methods of the dredged sediment are bowing and filling cofferdam and landfill after mechanical dewatering [4]; however, these methods could lead to serious environmental destruction and groundwater pollution. Thus, how to scientifically deal with the large quantity of sediment with complex composition and achieve its reduction, stabilization, harmless, and resource has become one of the problems that the domestic and international environmental protection organizations are concerned with.At present, the most common sediment treatment methods are landfill, preparation of fertilizer, preparation of building material, and pyrolysis [5]. However, considering the farm limitations and heavy metal harm, the landfill and preparation of fertilizer as well as building material are becoming more and more difficult to operate [6, 7]. Thus, pyrolysis was identified to be a promising sediment treatment technology, because it is a zero-waste method that can convert sediment into useful bioenergy. Pyrolysis is the thermal decomposition of raw materials at elevated temperatures in an inert atmosphere, and the main products are vapors including condensable and noncondensable gases, liquid bio-oils, and solid char [8].Several reports studied some pyrolysis characteristics of lake sediment. Zhang et al. [9] studied the copyrolysis behaviors of coal slime and river sediment using the method of liner warming. They indicated that the river sediment played a catalytic role on coal slime pyrolysis. Gu et al. [10] studied the variation of heavy metal speciation during pyrolysis of sediment from the Dianchi Lake in China. They indicated that the heavy metals Cd, Cu, Zn, and Pb speciated in thermally treated sediments showed different patterns from that of the lake sediment and pyrolysis temperature had a great impact on the fractional distribution of heavy metals. Wang et al. [11] studied cogasification of Dianchi sediment and lignite for hydrogen production in supercritical water. They indicated that the cogasification of sediment and lignite is a process with a high recovery of gaseous products but low gasification yields. However, few studies focused on the kinetic analysis of pyrolysis for lake sediment. In order to obtain a better understanding of the chemical and physical characteristics of sediment pyrolysis as well as reasonable devolatilization mechanism, it is necessary to do many contributions to the kinetic study of lake sediment pyrolysis. Some studies about pyrolysis characteristics of sediment from the Dianchi Lake have been done in the early stage [4].Thermogravimetric (TG) analysis is one of the most common thermal analysis techniques [12], but it can only give thermal decomposition temperature and thermal gravimetric percent content and not give qualitative results of volatile gases. However, TG-FTIR technology makes up the shortcomings of thermogravimetric method. Several researchers had studied the characteristics of various fuels pyrolysis through TG-FTIR, and some reaction models have been built to predict the biomass pyrolysis mechanism [13–15]. Through the TG-FTIR analysis, not only can the kinetic parameters be obtained by TG, but also the gas releasing from pyrolysis can be received, which can provide deeper understanding of the mechanism of pyrolysis, so it is widely used in thermal stability and thermal decomposition mechanism of a variety of organic and inorganic materials.The purpose of this work was to investigate the thermal degradation characteristics and pyrolysis kinetics of Dianchi Lake sediment through TG analysis at different heating rates. Meanwhile, FTIR coupled with TG was used to characterize the several main gaseous products evolved.


## 2. Materials and Methodology

### 2.1. Materials

The raw sediment was collected from the Caihai region of the Dianchi Lake in Kunming, China, and the water content was 68.25%. The sediment was subjected to drying (378 K for 24 h) and crushing and screening (through a 2 mm sieve). The ultimate analyses of the raw sediment are shown in Table1, and Table 2 shows proximate analysis of the raw sediment.Table 1
Ultimate analysis of the raw sediment.
Order number
Element
Content (wt%)
(
1
)
O
28.1508
(
2
)
C
22.2431
(
3
)
Si
12.5684
(
4
)
Al
11.4125
(
5
)
Fe
8.3655
(
6
)
Ca
6.5481
(
7
)
H
2.9828
(
8
)
N
1.5641
(
9
)
S
1.4836
(
10
)
K
0.9562
(
11
)
Mg
0.7521
(
12
)
Ti
0.6213
(
13
)
P
0.4089
(
14
)
V
0.3352
(
15
)
Na
0.3056
(
16
)
Cu
0.2944
(
17
)
Ba
0.2256
(
18
)
Zn
0.2093
(
19
)
Mn
0.1955
(
20
)
Zr
0.1923
(
21
)
Ni
0.1365
(
22
)
Cr
0.0125
(
23
)
Sr
0.0095
(
24
)
Y
0.0066
(
25
)
Rb
0.0058
(
26
)
Cl
0.0057
(
27
)
Mo
0.0043
(
28
)
Ga
0.0021
(
29
)
Pb
0.0015
(
30
)
As
0.0002Table 2
Proximate analysis of the raw sediment.
Material
Proximate analysis (wt.%)
M
V
FC
A
Sediment
8.44
40.46
7.67
43.43


### 2.2. TG-FTIR Analysis

The thermal pyrolysis of the raw sediment was carried out online by a TGA type (NETZSCH, STA 449F3, Germany) coupled with a FTIR type (BRUKER, ALPHA, Germany). After pass N2 for 5 min at 30 mL/min, about 3.7–4.2 mg samples were inserted into the TGA apparatus. When the samples were started to be heated from 40°C to 1000°C at three different heating rates (5°C/min, 10°C/min, and 20°C/min), the volatiles released were collected and analyzed by the FTIR with spectrum ranging from 4000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1 and a resolution of 1 cm−1. In order to reduce the test error to less than 5%, all the tests were repeated three times.


### 2.3. Pyrolysis Kinetic Analysis

According to Arrhenius equation, the pyrolysis reaction kinetics for lake sediment can be described as [16–18](1)dαdt=kTfα=Aexp⁡-ERTfα,where α is the reaction conversion degree, t is the time (min), T is the temperature (K), f(α) is the mechanism function equation, A is the preexponential factor (s−1), E is the activation energy (KJ/mol), and R is the universal gas constant (J/(mol·K)). α is obtained by the following equation:(2)α=wi-wwi-wf,where w is the mass of sample at time t (mg) and wi and wf are the initial mass and final mass of sample, respectively (mg). Equation (1) could be transformed by integration to(3)ln⁡gαT2=-ER·1T+ln⁡ARβE,where β is a constant heating rate (°C/min) and g(α) is a nth-order chemical reaction and could be described as(4)gα=1-α-n-1-1n-1.An appropriate n was chosen; a straight line could be drawn by plotting lng(α)/T2 versus 1/T. Thus, the kinetic parameters E and preexponential factor A can be determined by the slope and intercept of the linear line, respectively.


## 2.1. Materials

The raw sediment was collected from the Caihai region of the Dianchi Lake in Kunming, China, and the water content was 68.25%. The sediment was subjected to drying (378 K for 24 h) and crushing and screening (through a 2 mm sieve). The ultimate analyses of the raw sediment are shown in Table1, and Table 2 shows proximate analysis of the raw sediment.Table 1
Ultimate analysis of the raw sediment.
Order number
Element
Content (wt%)
(
1
)
O
28.1508
(
2
)
C
22.2431
(
3
)
Si
12.5684
(
4
)
Al
11.4125
(
5
)
Fe
8.3655
(
6
)
Ca
6.5481
(
7
)
H
2.9828
(
8
)
N
1.5641
(
9
)
S
1.4836
(
10
)
K
0.9562
(
11
)
Mg
0.7521
(
12
)
Ti
0.6213
(
13
)
P
0.4089
(
14
)
V
0.3352
(
15
)
Na
0.3056
(
16
)
Cu
0.2944
(
17
)
Ba
0.2256
(
18
)
Zn
0.2093
(
19
)
Mn
0.1955
(
20
)
Zr
0.1923
(
21
)
Ni
0.1365
(
22
)
Cr
0.0125
(
23
)
Sr
0.0095
(
24
)
Y
0.0066
(
25
)
Rb
0.0058
(
26
)
Cl
0.0057
(
27
)
Mo
0.0043
(
28
)
Ga
0.0021
(
29
)
Pb
0.0015
(
30
)
As
0.0002Table 2
Proximate analysis of the raw sediment.
Material
Proximate analysis (wt.%)
M
V
FC
A
Sediment
8.44
40.46
7.67
43.43


## 2.2. TG-FTIR Analysis

The thermal pyrolysis of the raw sediment was carried out online by a TGA type (NETZSCH, STA 449F3, Germany) coupled with a FTIR type (BRUKER, ALPHA, Germany). After pass N2 for 5 min at 30 mL/min, about 3.7–4.2 mg samples were inserted into the TGA apparatus. When the samples were started to be heated from 40°C to 1000°C at three different heating rates (5°C/min, 10°C/min, and 20°C/min), the volatiles released were collected and analyzed by the FTIR with spectrum ranging from 4000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1 and a resolution of 1 cm−1. In order to reduce the test error to less than 5%, all the tests were repeated three times.


## 2.3. Pyrolysis Kinetic Analysis

According to Arrhenius equation, the pyrolysis reaction kinetics for lake sediment can be described as [16–18](1)dαdt=kTfα=Aexp⁡-ERTfα,where α is the reaction conversion degree, t is the time (min), T is the temperature (K), f(α) is the mechanism function equation, A is the preexponential factor (s−1), E is the activation energy (KJ/mol), and R is the universal gas constant (J/(mol·K)). α is obtained by the following equation:(2)α=wi-wwi-wf,where w is the mass of sample at time t (mg) and wi and wf are the initial mass and final mass of sample, respectively (mg). Equation (1) could be transformed by integration to(3)ln⁡gαT2=-ER·1T+ln⁡ARβE,where β is a constant heating rate (°C/min) and g(α) is a nth-order chemical reaction and could be described as(4)gα=1-α-n-1-1n-1.An appropriate n was chosen; a straight line could be drawn by plotting lng(α)/T2 versus 1/T. Thus, the kinetic parameters E and preexponential factor A can be determined by the slope and intercept of the linear line, respectively.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. TGA Analysis and Kinetic Parameter from Pyrolysis of Sediment

#### 3.1.1. TG and DTG Analysis

The TG and DTG curves of sediment pyrolysis at different heating rates were illustrated in Figures1 and 2, respectively. As shown in Figure 1, the remaining mass fraction curve was shifted down the temperature scale by a decrease in the heating rate. From Figure 2, it is seen that there were three weight loss peaks at 20°C/min, but there were four weight loss peaks at 5°C/min and 10°C/min. The devolatilization process of sediment samples occurred in a range of temperature between 200°C and 800°C. The characteristic parameters for sediment sample pyrolysis at different heating rates were presented in Table 3; it is known that the temperatures according to the first, the second, the third, and the fourth weight loss peaks at 10°C/min were lower than that at 20°C/min, respectively. It is indicated that the occurrence of weight loss peaks tended to low temperature region with the decrease of heating rate. Meanwhile, the maximum mass loss rates according to the first, the second, the third, and the fourth peaks were slightly higher than that at 20°C/min, respectively. It is indicated that the reaction was more intense with the decrease of heating rate. Meanwhile, the lack of the fourth peak and the higher Mf value at 20°C/min indicated that the pyrolysis reaction of sediment might be incomplete at high heating rate. The phenomenon was attributed to the fact that the short reaction time at high heating rate would interfere with the release of volatiles in pyrolysis. Although there is little difference in TG and DTG curves between 5°C/min and 10°C/min, reaction time was shorter and efficiency was higher at 10°C/min than those at 5°C/min. To conclude, the pyrolysis process at 10°C/min could describe the sediment pyrolysis characteristics better than at 5°C/min and 20°C/min.Table 3
Characteristic parameters for sediment pyrolysis at different heating rates.
Heating rate
T
1
a
T
2
a
T
3
a
T
4
a
D
T
G
m
a
x
1
b
D
T
G
m
a
x
2
b
D
T
G
m
a
x
3
b
D
T
G
m
a
x
4
b
M
f
c
(°C/min)
(°C)
(°C)
(°C)
(°C)
(%/min)
(%/min)
(%/min)
(%/min)
(%)
20
112.25
359.85
728.73
/
−2.30
−2.67
−2.54
/
49.56
10
100.78
290.14
650.38
920.67
−2.41
−2.66
−2.55
−1.25
47.71
5
100.01
263.88
637.14
901.56
−2.52
−2.66
−2.56
−1.28
47.44
a
T
1, T2, T3, and T4: the temperature according to the first, the second, the third, and the fourth weight loss peak, respectively; bDTGmax1, DTGmax2, DTGmax3, and DTGmax4: the maximum mass loss rate according to the first, the second, the third, and the fourth peak, respectively; cMf: the residual mass fraction.Figure 1
The TG curves for pyrolysis of sediment at different heating rates.Figure 2
The DTG curves for pyrolysis of sediment at different heating rates.During the whole sediment pyrolysis process at the heating rate of 10°C/min, four stages were considered: (a) in the first stage while the temperature was from 40°C to 160°C, the total weight loss was accounting for about 12.15% of total weight of sample, which was attributed to the release of 8.44% moisture (shown in Table1) and crystal water, as well as the decomposition of a certain amount of small-molecule reactive components. (b) The second stage ranged from 160°C to 520°C, the total weight loss was accounting for about 23.36%, and the volatile matter of a large number of light organic compounds such as alcohols and saccharides [19], as well as macromolecule organic matters such as proteins, cellulose, and semicellulose polysaccharides and saturated aliphatic chains, were mainly decomposed in this stage. The products of the stage were mainly carbon dioxide, combustible gas, tar, and coke. (c) The third stage was from 520°C to 780°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 10.41%, which was attributed to the decomposition of a small part of macromolecule organic matters and secondary cracking of tar and coke generated in the second stage. (d) The fourth stage was above 780°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 6.25%. As shown in Table 2, this was mainly due to the following: the partly decomposition of mineral salts such as combinations of SiO2 and other oxides (mostly metal oxide) [20] and then SiO2 and C reacted to produce SiC and CO at high temperature. As for at the heating rate of 20°C/min, three stages were considered. The first stage extended from 40°C to 180°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 10.55% of total weight of sample, which was attributed to the release of moisture and crystal water. The second stage was from 180°C to 600°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 27.54%, which was due to the decomposition of a large number of light organic compounds and macromolecule organic matters. The third stage was above 600°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 12.27%, which was due to partly secondary cracking of tar and coke generated in the second stage and decomposition of inorganic matters.


#### 3.1.2. Kinetic Analysis

From the above description, the organics thermal degradation mainly occurred in the second and third stages in DTG analysis; thus the two stages were regarded as the main reaction region during sediment pyrolysis. The two temperature regions from 160°C to 520°C and from 520°C to 780°C at different heating rates were chosen for kinetic comparison analysis, which were marked as the first and the second organics degradation stage, respectively.The fitting oflng(α)/T2 versus 1/T lines for the first and the second organics degradation stage at different heating rates was established and presented in Figure 3, where numbers 1 and 2 inside parentheses indicated the order of stages. From Figure 3, it is known that all the correlation coefficients R2 of fitting lines were above 0.992, which indicated that the nth-order chemical reaction model was suitable to describe the lake sediment pyrolysis reaction well.Figure 3
Kinetic fitting lines of organics degradation stages at different heating rates.The bestn values, activation energies, and preexponential factors of kinetic analysis at organics degradation stage were presented in Table 4. The values of n at different heating rates were between 2.55 and 3.42. The value of reaction order n greater than 1 can be justified to correspond to the case of composite compounds [21]. The reaction order n, activation energy E, and preexponential factor A of the second organic degradation stage were greater than those of the first stage at any heating rate, which was due to the complexity of macromolecule organic matters degradation at second stage. Meanwhile, all kinetic parameters at heating rate of 20°C/min were higher than at 10°C/min, which showed that the sediment pyrolysis reaction at 10°C/min was easier than at 20°C/min. The decrease of heating rate made the temperature distribution of sediment particles more uniform, and the pyrolysis volatiles could be released in time to ensure the smooth progress of the internal thermal decomposition.Table 4
Kinetic parameters of organics degradation stages at different heating rates.
Heating rate
First organics degradation stage
Second organics degradation stage
°C/min
n
E/KJ mol−1
A/s−1
n
E/KJ mol−1
A/s−1
20
2.97
18.02
1.88
3.42
57.92
661.61
10
2.63
16.29
1.36
3.15
51.42
589.94
5
2.55
15.83
1.31
3.03
50.67
574.18


### 3.2. TG-FTIR for the Gaseous Products during Sediment Pyrolysis

#### 3.2.1. Analysis of the FTIR Spectra

According to the four decomposition stages of sediment pyrolysis at heating rate of 10°C/min, the temperatures of 100°C, 290°C, 650°C, and 920°C corresponding to the maximum decomposition rate of four stages according to DTG analysis were chosen as TG-FTIR analysis objects, respectively. The gaseous products of H2O, CO2, CO, CH4, and SO2 and several functional groups (C-H, C=O, and C-O) could be found from the IR spectrum in Figure 4. However, H2 as a common gas during biomass pyrolysis did not get detected by IR spectrum, which was due to weak infrared absorption of H2 [22]; thus H2 will be detected by gas chromatography in the future research.Figure 4
Three-dimensional FTIR of gaseous products obtained from sediment pyrolysis.As shown in Figure5, the different IR spectra were complex with a great deal of absorption bands. However, five noticeable absorption bands could be distinguished, which were 4000–3500 cm−1, 3250–2850 cm−1, 2500–2100 cm−1, 1850–1250 cm−1, and 900–500 cm−1. The IR spectrum of sediment pyrolysis at 100°C had high absorbance that occurred in the region of 3800–3500 cm−1 and 1600–1350 cm−1 corresponding to H2O, which was due to the release of moisture and crystal water. Meanwhile, there was obvious absorbance peak in the region of 2400–2240 cm−1 corresponding to CO2, which was attributed to decomposition of a certain amount of small-molecule reactive components. The IR spectrum of sediment pyrolysis at 290°C had high absorbance in the region of 2400–2240 cm−1 and 750–620 cm−1 corresponding to CO2. The absorbance intensity of CO2 in the IR spectrum at 290°C was higher than that at 100°C, and the absorbance intensity of H2O at 290°C was lower than that at 100°C. Besides, there were obvious absorbance peaks that occurred in the region of 3250–2850 cm−1, 2250–2100 cm−1, and 1750–1400 cm−1 corresponding to CH4, CO, and SO2, respectively, which was attributed to decomposition of proteins, cellulose, and semicellulose polysaccharides and saturated aliphatic chains. The generation of C-H functional groups (present in hydrocarbons and methane), C=O functional groups (present in esters, aldehydes, ketones, etc.), and C-O functional groups (present in phenol, alcohols, ethers, etc.) [23] in the regions of 3200–2850 cm−1, 1850–1600 cm−1, and 900–750 cm−1 corresponding to the lipids and proteins decomposition. The absorbance intensity of CO2 and H2O in the IR spectrum at 650°C were lower than that at 290°C; however, the absorbance intensity of CH4, CO, and SO2 at 650°C increased, which were due to secondary cracking of tar and coke generated in previous reaction and decomposition of the sulfur components in sediment. For 920°C, it was clear that the intensity of IR spectrum was very weak, indicating that the decomposition of organics matters almost finished. However there existed a significant absorbance peak of CO at 920°C, which was due to the fact that the high temperature enhanced reduction reaction and was better for the generation of CO.Figure 5
IR spectrum of gaseous products obtained from sediment pyrolysis at several selected temperatures.


#### 3.2.2. Evolution Characteristics of the Main Gaseous Products with the Temperature

In order to understand the evolution characteristics of the main gaseous products during the sediment pyrolysis, the evolution curves with the temperature of the absorbance of the bands associated with CO2 (2350 cm−1), CH4 (3016 cm−1), CO (2210 cm−1), and SO2 (1342 cm−1) at different heating rates were presented in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6(a), there were two evolution peaks of CO2 at three heating rates, corresponding to 385°C and 725°C at 20°C/min, corresponding to 290°C and 625°C at 10°C/min, and corresponding to 270°C and 618°C at 5°C/min, respectively. It is known that the CO2 evolution peaks shifted to the low temperature region and the peak value decreased with the decrease of heating rate. Meanwhile, the two evolution peaks were consistent to the weight loss peaks of the DTG curve at organics decomposition stage at any heating rate. Thus, the IR evolution curve of CO2 and the pyrolysis DTG curve of sediment had similar release trend and characteristic temperatures. As shown in Figure 6(b), with the temperature increasing, there was only one evolution peak of CH4 at any heating rate, corresponding to 480°C at 20°C/min, 415°C at 10°C/min, and 391°C at 5°C/min, respectively. The generation of CH4 mainly came from methanation [24]. It is known that the CH4 evolution peak shifted to the low temperature region and the peak value increased with the decrease of heating rate. The evolution of CO is observed in Figure 6(c), and the IR evolution curve had been climbing gradually with the temperature increasing, which was due to the increasing reduction reaction at high temperature. The evolution difference among the three heating rates was not obvious. As shown in Figure 6(d), there was only one evolution peak of SO2 at any heating rate, corresponding to 500°C at 20°C/min, 480°C at 10°C/min, and 472°C at 5°C/min, respectively. It is known that the SO2 evolution peak shifted to the low temperature region and the peak value decreased with the decrease of heating rate.Figure 6
Evolution curves of the gaseous products with temperature: (a) CO2, (b) CH4, (c), CO (d), and SO2.
(a)
CO2
(b)
CH4
(c)
CO
(d)
SO2


## 3.1. TGA Analysis and Kinetic Parameter from Pyrolysis of Sediment

### 3.1.1. TG and DTG Analysis

The TG and DTG curves of sediment pyrolysis at different heating rates were illustrated in Figures1 and 2, respectively. As shown in Figure 1, the remaining mass fraction curve was shifted down the temperature scale by a decrease in the heating rate. From Figure 2, it is seen that there were three weight loss peaks at 20°C/min, but there were four weight loss peaks at 5°C/min and 10°C/min. The devolatilization process of sediment samples occurred in a range of temperature between 200°C and 800°C. The characteristic parameters for sediment sample pyrolysis at different heating rates were presented in Table 3; it is known that the temperatures according to the first, the second, the third, and the fourth weight loss peaks at 10°C/min were lower than that at 20°C/min, respectively. It is indicated that the occurrence of weight loss peaks tended to low temperature region with the decrease of heating rate. Meanwhile, the maximum mass loss rates according to the first, the second, the third, and the fourth peaks were slightly higher than that at 20°C/min, respectively. It is indicated that the reaction was more intense with the decrease of heating rate. Meanwhile, the lack of the fourth peak and the higher Mf value at 20°C/min indicated that the pyrolysis reaction of sediment might be incomplete at high heating rate. The phenomenon was attributed to the fact that the short reaction time at high heating rate would interfere with the release of volatiles in pyrolysis. Although there is little difference in TG and DTG curves between 5°C/min and 10°C/min, reaction time was shorter and efficiency was higher at 10°C/min than those at 5°C/min. To conclude, the pyrolysis process at 10°C/min could describe the sediment pyrolysis characteristics better than at 5°C/min and 20°C/min.Table 3
Characteristic parameters for sediment pyrolysis at different heating rates.
Heating rate
T
1
a
T
2
a
T
3
a
T
4
a
D
T
G
m
a
x
1
b
D
T
G
m
a
x
2
b
D
T
G
m
a
x
3
b
D
T
G
m
a
x
4
b
M
f
c
(°C/min)
(°C)
(°C)
(°C)
(°C)
(%/min)
(%/min)
(%/min)
(%/min)
(%)
20
112.25
359.85
728.73
/
−2.30
−2.67
−2.54
/
49.56
10
100.78
290.14
650.38
920.67
−2.41
−2.66
−2.55
−1.25
47.71
5
100.01
263.88
637.14
901.56
−2.52
−2.66
−2.56
−1.28
47.44
a
T
1, T2, T3, and T4: the temperature according to the first, the second, the third, and the fourth weight loss peak, respectively; bDTGmax1, DTGmax2, DTGmax3, and DTGmax4: the maximum mass loss rate according to the first, the second, the third, and the fourth peak, respectively; cMf: the residual mass fraction.Figure 1
The TG curves for pyrolysis of sediment at different heating rates.Figure 2
The DTG curves for pyrolysis of sediment at different heating rates.During the whole sediment pyrolysis process at the heating rate of 10°C/min, four stages were considered: (a) in the first stage while the temperature was from 40°C to 160°C, the total weight loss was accounting for about 12.15% of total weight of sample, which was attributed to the release of 8.44% moisture (shown in Table1) and crystal water, as well as the decomposition of a certain amount of small-molecule reactive components. (b) The second stage ranged from 160°C to 520°C, the total weight loss was accounting for about 23.36%, and the volatile matter of a large number of light organic compounds such as alcohols and saccharides [19], as well as macromolecule organic matters such as proteins, cellulose, and semicellulose polysaccharides and saturated aliphatic chains, were mainly decomposed in this stage. The products of the stage were mainly carbon dioxide, combustible gas, tar, and coke. (c) The third stage was from 520°C to 780°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 10.41%, which was attributed to the decomposition of a small part of macromolecule organic matters and secondary cracking of tar and coke generated in the second stage. (d) The fourth stage was above 780°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 6.25%. As shown in Table 2, this was mainly due to the following: the partly decomposition of mineral salts such as combinations of SiO2 and other oxides (mostly metal oxide) [20] and then SiO2 and C reacted to produce SiC and CO at high temperature. As for at the heating rate of 20°C/min, three stages were considered. The first stage extended from 40°C to 180°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 10.55% of total weight of sample, which was attributed to the release of moisture and crystal water. The second stage was from 180°C to 600°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 27.54%, which was due to the decomposition of a large number of light organic compounds and macromolecule organic matters. The third stage was above 600°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 12.27%, which was due to partly secondary cracking of tar and coke generated in the second stage and decomposition of inorganic matters.


### 3.1.2. Kinetic Analysis

From the above description, the organics thermal degradation mainly occurred in the second and third stages in DTG analysis; thus the two stages were regarded as the main reaction region during sediment pyrolysis. The two temperature regions from 160°C to 520°C and from 520°C to 780°C at different heating rates were chosen for kinetic comparison analysis, which were marked as the first and the second organics degradation stage, respectively.The fitting oflng(α)/T2 versus 1/T lines for the first and the second organics degradation stage at different heating rates was established and presented in Figure 3, where numbers 1 and 2 inside parentheses indicated the order of stages. From Figure 3, it is known that all the correlation coefficients R2 of fitting lines were above 0.992, which indicated that the nth-order chemical reaction model was suitable to describe the lake sediment pyrolysis reaction well.Figure 3
Kinetic fitting lines of organics degradation stages at different heating rates.The bestn values, activation energies, and preexponential factors of kinetic analysis at organics degradation stage were presented in Table 4. The values of n at different heating rates were between 2.55 and 3.42. The value of reaction order n greater than 1 can be justified to correspond to the case of composite compounds [21]. The reaction order n, activation energy E, and preexponential factor A of the second organic degradation stage were greater than those of the first stage at any heating rate, which was due to the complexity of macromolecule organic matters degradation at second stage. Meanwhile, all kinetic parameters at heating rate of 20°C/min were higher than at 10°C/min, which showed that the sediment pyrolysis reaction at 10°C/min was easier than at 20°C/min. The decrease of heating rate made the temperature distribution of sediment particles more uniform, and the pyrolysis volatiles could be released in time to ensure the smooth progress of the internal thermal decomposition.Table 4
Kinetic parameters of organics degradation stages at different heating rates.
Heating rate
First organics degradation stage
Second organics degradation stage
°C/min
n
E/KJ mol−1
A/s−1
n
E/KJ mol−1
A/s−1
20
2.97
18.02
1.88
3.42
57.92
661.61
10
2.63
16.29
1.36
3.15
51.42
589.94
5
2.55
15.83
1.31
3.03
50.67
574.18


## 3.1.1. TG and DTG Analysis

The TG and DTG curves of sediment pyrolysis at different heating rates were illustrated in Figures1 and 2, respectively. As shown in Figure 1, the remaining mass fraction curve was shifted down the temperature scale by a decrease in the heating rate. From Figure 2, it is seen that there were three weight loss peaks at 20°C/min, but there were four weight loss peaks at 5°C/min and 10°C/min. The devolatilization process of sediment samples occurred in a range of temperature between 200°C and 800°C. The characteristic parameters for sediment sample pyrolysis at different heating rates were presented in Table 3; it is known that the temperatures according to the first, the second, the third, and the fourth weight loss peaks at 10°C/min were lower than that at 20°C/min, respectively. It is indicated that the occurrence of weight loss peaks tended to low temperature region with the decrease of heating rate. Meanwhile, the maximum mass loss rates according to the first, the second, the third, and the fourth peaks were slightly higher than that at 20°C/min, respectively. It is indicated that the reaction was more intense with the decrease of heating rate. Meanwhile, the lack of the fourth peak and the higher Mf value at 20°C/min indicated that the pyrolysis reaction of sediment might be incomplete at high heating rate. The phenomenon was attributed to the fact that the short reaction time at high heating rate would interfere with the release of volatiles in pyrolysis. Although there is little difference in TG and DTG curves between 5°C/min and 10°C/min, reaction time was shorter and efficiency was higher at 10°C/min than those at 5°C/min. To conclude, the pyrolysis process at 10°C/min could describe the sediment pyrolysis characteristics better than at 5°C/min and 20°C/min.Table 3
Characteristic parameters for sediment pyrolysis at different heating rates.
Heating rate
T
1
a
T
2
a
T
3
a
T
4
a
D
T
G
m
a
x
1
b
D
T
G
m
a
x
2
b
D
T
G
m
a
x
3
b
D
T
G
m
a
x
4
b
M
f
c
(°C/min)
(°C)
(°C)
(°C)
(°C)
(%/min)
(%/min)
(%/min)
(%/min)
(%)
20
112.25
359.85
728.73
/
−2.30
−2.67
−2.54
/
49.56
10
100.78
290.14
650.38
920.67
−2.41
−2.66
−2.55
−1.25
47.71
5
100.01
263.88
637.14
901.56
−2.52
−2.66
−2.56
−1.28
47.44
a
T
1, T2, T3, and T4: the temperature according to the first, the second, the third, and the fourth weight loss peak, respectively; bDTGmax1, DTGmax2, DTGmax3, and DTGmax4: the maximum mass loss rate according to the first, the second, the third, and the fourth peak, respectively; cMf: the residual mass fraction.Figure 1
The TG curves for pyrolysis of sediment at different heating rates.Figure 2
The DTG curves for pyrolysis of sediment at different heating rates.During the whole sediment pyrolysis process at the heating rate of 10°C/min, four stages were considered: (a) in the first stage while the temperature was from 40°C to 160°C, the total weight loss was accounting for about 12.15% of total weight of sample, which was attributed to the release of 8.44% moisture (shown in Table1) and crystal water, as well as the decomposition of a certain amount of small-molecule reactive components. (b) The second stage ranged from 160°C to 520°C, the total weight loss was accounting for about 23.36%, and the volatile matter of a large number of light organic compounds such as alcohols and saccharides [19], as well as macromolecule organic matters such as proteins, cellulose, and semicellulose polysaccharides and saturated aliphatic chains, were mainly decomposed in this stage. The products of the stage were mainly carbon dioxide, combustible gas, tar, and coke. (c) The third stage was from 520°C to 780°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 10.41%, which was attributed to the decomposition of a small part of macromolecule organic matters and secondary cracking of tar and coke generated in the second stage. (d) The fourth stage was above 780°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 6.25%. As shown in Table 2, this was mainly due to the following: the partly decomposition of mineral salts such as combinations of SiO2 and other oxides (mostly metal oxide) [20] and then SiO2 and C reacted to produce SiC and CO at high temperature. As for at the heating rate of 20°C/min, three stages were considered. The first stage extended from 40°C to 180°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 10.55% of total weight of sample, which was attributed to the release of moisture and crystal water. The second stage was from 180°C to 600°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 27.54%, which was due to the decomposition of a large number of light organic compounds and macromolecule organic matters. The third stage was above 600°C, and the total weight loss was accounting for about 12.27%, which was due to partly secondary cracking of tar and coke generated in the second stage and decomposition of inorganic matters.


## 3.1.2. Kinetic Analysis

From the above description, the organics thermal degradation mainly occurred in the second and third stages in DTG analysis; thus the two stages were regarded as the main reaction region during sediment pyrolysis. The two temperature regions from 160°C to 520°C and from 520°C to 780°C at different heating rates were chosen for kinetic comparison analysis, which were marked as the first and the second organics degradation stage, respectively.The fitting oflng(α)/T2 versus 1/T lines for the first and the second organics degradation stage at different heating rates was established and presented in Figure 3, where numbers 1 and 2 inside parentheses indicated the order of stages. From Figure 3, it is known that all the correlation coefficients R2 of fitting lines were above 0.992, which indicated that the nth-order chemical reaction model was suitable to describe the lake sediment pyrolysis reaction well.Figure 3
Kinetic fitting lines of organics degradation stages at different heating rates.The bestn values, activation energies, and preexponential factors of kinetic analysis at organics degradation stage were presented in Table 4. The values of n at different heating rates were between 2.55 and 3.42. The value of reaction order n greater than 1 can be justified to correspond to the case of composite compounds [21]. The reaction order n, activation energy E, and preexponential factor A of the second organic degradation stage were greater than those of the first stage at any heating rate, which was due to the complexity of macromolecule organic matters degradation at second stage. Meanwhile, all kinetic parameters at heating rate of 20°C/min were higher than at 10°C/min, which showed that the sediment pyrolysis reaction at 10°C/min was easier than at 20°C/min. The decrease of heating rate made the temperature distribution of sediment particles more uniform, and the pyrolysis volatiles could be released in time to ensure the smooth progress of the internal thermal decomposition.Table 4
Kinetic parameters of organics degradation stages at different heating rates.
Heating rate
First organics degradation stage
Second organics degradation stage
°C/min
n
E/KJ mol−1
A/s−1
n
E/KJ mol−1
A/s−1
20
2.97
18.02
1.88
3.42
57.92
661.61
10
2.63
16.29
1.36
3.15
51.42
589.94
5
2.55
15.83
1.31
3.03
50.67
574.18


## 3.2. TG-FTIR for the Gaseous Products during Sediment Pyrolysis

### 3.2.1. Analysis of the FTIR Spectra

According to the four decomposition stages of sediment pyrolysis at heating rate of 10°C/min, the temperatures of 100°C, 290°C, 650°C, and 920°C corresponding to the maximum decomposition rate of four stages according to DTG analysis were chosen as TG-FTIR analysis objects, respectively. The gaseous products of H2O, CO2, CO, CH4, and SO2 and several functional groups (C-H, C=O, and C-O) could be found from the IR spectrum in Figure 4. However, H2 as a common gas during biomass pyrolysis did not get detected by IR spectrum, which was due to weak infrared absorption of H2 [22]; thus H2 will be detected by gas chromatography in the future research.Figure 4
Three-dimensional FTIR of gaseous products obtained from sediment pyrolysis.As shown in Figure5, the different IR spectra were complex with a great deal of absorption bands. However, five noticeable absorption bands could be distinguished, which were 4000–3500 cm−1, 3250–2850 cm−1, 2500–2100 cm−1, 1850–1250 cm−1, and 900–500 cm−1. The IR spectrum of sediment pyrolysis at 100°C had high absorbance that occurred in the region of 3800–3500 cm−1 and 1600–1350 cm−1 corresponding to H2O, which was due to the release of moisture and crystal water. Meanwhile, there was obvious absorbance peak in the region of 2400–2240 cm−1 corresponding to CO2, which was attributed to decomposition of a certain amount of small-molecule reactive components. The IR spectrum of sediment pyrolysis at 290°C had high absorbance in the region of 2400–2240 cm−1 and 750–620 cm−1 corresponding to CO2. The absorbance intensity of CO2 in the IR spectrum at 290°C was higher than that at 100°C, and the absorbance intensity of H2O at 290°C was lower than that at 100°C. Besides, there were obvious absorbance peaks that occurred in the region of 3250–2850 cm−1, 2250–2100 cm−1, and 1750–1400 cm−1 corresponding to CH4, CO, and SO2, respectively, which was attributed to decomposition of proteins, cellulose, and semicellulose polysaccharides and saturated aliphatic chains. The generation of C-H functional groups (present in hydrocarbons and methane), C=O functional groups (present in esters, aldehydes, ketones, etc.), and C-O functional groups (present in phenol, alcohols, ethers, etc.) [23] in the regions of 3200–2850 cm−1, 1850–1600 cm−1, and 900–750 cm−1 corresponding to the lipids and proteins decomposition. The absorbance intensity of CO2 and H2O in the IR spectrum at 650°C were lower than that at 290°C; however, the absorbance intensity of CH4, CO, and SO2 at 650°C increased, which were due to secondary cracking of tar and coke generated in previous reaction and decomposition of the sulfur components in sediment. For 920°C, it was clear that the intensity of IR spectrum was very weak, indicating that the decomposition of organics matters almost finished. However there existed a significant absorbance peak of CO at 920°C, which was due to the fact that the high temperature enhanced reduction reaction and was better for the generation of CO.Figure 5
IR spectrum of gaseous products obtained from sediment pyrolysis at several selected temperatures.


### 3.2.2. Evolution Characteristics of the Main Gaseous Products with the Temperature

In order to understand the evolution characteristics of the main gaseous products during the sediment pyrolysis, the evolution curves with the temperature of the absorbance of the bands associated with CO2 (2350 cm−1), CH4 (3016 cm−1), CO (2210 cm−1), and SO2 (1342 cm−1) at different heating rates were presented in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6(a), there were two evolution peaks of CO2 at three heating rates, corresponding to 385°C and 725°C at 20°C/min, corresponding to 290°C and 625°C at 10°C/min, and corresponding to 270°C and 618°C at 5°C/min, respectively. It is known that the CO2 evolution peaks shifted to the low temperature region and the peak value decreased with the decrease of heating rate. Meanwhile, the two evolution peaks were consistent to the weight loss peaks of the DTG curve at organics decomposition stage at any heating rate. Thus, the IR evolution curve of CO2 and the pyrolysis DTG curve of sediment had similar release trend and characteristic temperatures. As shown in Figure 6(b), with the temperature increasing, there was only one evolution peak of CH4 at any heating rate, corresponding to 480°C at 20°C/min, 415°C at 10°C/min, and 391°C at 5°C/min, respectively. The generation of CH4 mainly came from methanation [24]. It is known that the CH4 evolution peak shifted to the low temperature region and the peak value increased with the decrease of heating rate. The evolution of CO is observed in Figure 6(c), and the IR evolution curve had been climbing gradually with the temperature increasing, which was due to the increasing reduction reaction at high temperature. The evolution difference among the three heating rates was not obvious. As shown in Figure 6(d), there was only one evolution peak of SO2 at any heating rate, corresponding to 500°C at 20°C/min, 480°C at 10°C/min, and 472°C at 5°C/min, respectively. It is known that the SO2 evolution peak shifted to the low temperature region and the peak value decreased with the decrease of heating rate.Figure 6
Evolution curves of the gaseous products with temperature: (a) CO2, (b) CH4, (c), CO (d), and SO2.
(a)
CO2
(b)
CH4
(c)
CO
(d)
SO2


## 3.2.1. Analysis of the FTIR Spectra

According to the four decomposition stages of sediment pyrolysis at heating rate of 10°C/min, the temperatures of 100°C, 290°C, 650°C, and 920°C corresponding to the maximum decomposition rate of four stages according to DTG analysis were chosen as TG-FTIR analysis objects, respectively. The gaseous products of H2O, CO2, CO, CH4, and SO2 and several functional groups (C-H, C=O, and C-O) could be found from the IR spectrum in Figure 4. However, H2 as a common gas during biomass pyrolysis did not get detected by IR spectrum, which was due to weak infrared absorption of H2 [22]; thus H2 will be detected by gas chromatography in the future research.Figure 4
Three-dimensional FTIR of gaseous products obtained from sediment pyrolysis.As shown in Figure5, the different IR spectra were complex with a great deal of absorption bands. However, five noticeable absorption bands could be distinguished, which were 4000–3500 cm−1, 3250–2850 cm−1, 2500–2100 cm−1, 1850–1250 cm−1, and 900–500 cm−1. The IR spectrum of sediment pyrolysis at 100°C had high absorbance that occurred in the region of 3800–3500 cm−1 and 1600–1350 cm−1 corresponding to H2O, which was due to the release of moisture and crystal water. Meanwhile, there was obvious absorbance peak in the region of 2400–2240 cm−1 corresponding to CO2, which was attributed to decomposition of a certain amount of small-molecule reactive components. The IR spectrum of sediment pyrolysis at 290°C had high absorbance in the region of 2400–2240 cm−1 and 750–620 cm−1 corresponding to CO2. The absorbance intensity of CO2 in the IR spectrum at 290°C was higher than that at 100°C, and the absorbance intensity of H2O at 290°C was lower than that at 100°C. Besides, there were obvious absorbance peaks that occurred in the region of 3250–2850 cm−1, 2250–2100 cm−1, and 1750–1400 cm−1 corresponding to CH4, CO, and SO2, respectively, which was attributed to decomposition of proteins, cellulose, and semicellulose polysaccharides and saturated aliphatic chains. The generation of C-H functional groups (present in hydrocarbons and methane), C=O functional groups (present in esters, aldehydes, ketones, etc.), and C-O functional groups (present in phenol, alcohols, ethers, etc.) [23] in the regions of 3200–2850 cm−1, 1850–1600 cm−1, and 900–750 cm−1 corresponding to the lipids and proteins decomposition. The absorbance intensity of CO2 and H2O in the IR spectrum at 650°C were lower than that at 290°C; however, the absorbance intensity of CH4, CO, and SO2 at 650°C increased, which were due to secondary cracking of tar and coke generated in previous reaction and decomposition of the sulfur components in sediment. For 920°C, it was clear that the intensity of IR spectrum was very weak, indicating that the decomposition of organics matters almost finished. However there existed a significant absorbance peak of CO at 920°C, which was due to the fact that the high temperature enhanced reduction reaction and was better for the generation of CO.Figure 5
IR spectrum of gaseous products obtained from sediment pyrolysis at several selected temperatures.


## 3.2.2. Evolution Characteristics of the Main Gaseous Products with the Temperature

In order to understand the evolution characteristics of the main gaseous products during the sediment pyrolysis, the evolution curves with the temperature of the absorbance of the bands associated with CO2 (2350 cm−1), CH4 (3016 cm−1), CO (2210 cm−1), and SO2 (1342 cm−1) at different heating rates were presented in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6(a), there were two evolution peaks of CO2 at three heating rates, corresponding to 385°C and 725°C at 20°C/min, corresponding to 290°C and 625°C at 10°C/min, and corresponding to 270°C and 618°C at 5°C/min, respectively. It is known that the CO2 evolution peaks shifted to the low temperature region and the peak value decreased with the decrease of heating rate. Meanwhile, the two evolution peaks were consistent to the weight loss peaks of the DTG curve at organics decomposition stage at any heating rate. Thus, the IR evolution curve of CO2 and the pyrolysis DTG curve of sediment had similar release trend and characteristic temperatures. As shown in Figure 6(b), with the temperature increasing, there was only one evolution peak of CH4 at any heating rate, corresponding to 480°C at 20°C/min, 415°C at 10°C/min, and 391°C at 5°C/min, respectively. The generation of CH4 mainly came from methanation [24]. It is known that the CH4 evolution peak shifted to the low temperature region and the peak value increased with the decrease of heating rate. The evolution of CO is observed in Figure 6(c), and the IR evolution curve had been climbing gradually with the temperature increasing, which was due to the increasing reduction reaction at high temperature. The evolution difference among the three heating rates was not obvious. As shown in Figure 6(d), there was only one evolution peak of SO2 at any heating rate, corresponding to 500°C at 20°C/min, 480°C at 10°C/min, and 472°C at 5°C/min, respectively. It is known that the SO2 evolution peak shifted to the low temperature region and the peak value decreased with the decrease of heating rate.Figure 6
Evolution curves of the gaseous products with temperature: (a) CO2, (b) CH4, (c), CO (d), and SO2.
(a)
CO2
(b)
CH4
(c)
CO
(d)
SO2


## 4. Conclusions

In the present study, the kinetic behaviors of sediment pyrolysis and evolution characteristics of the gaseous products at different heating rates were investigated by TG-FTIR. In comparison to the TG and DTG curves at different heating rates, the process of sediment pyrolysis could be considered as four stages at 10°C/min, which were the release stage of moisture and crystal water, the decomposition stage of light organic compounds, the decomposition stage of macromolecule organic matters and secondary cracking of tar and coke, and the decomposition stage of mineral salts. From the kinetics analysis, the values ofn at different heating rates were between 2.55 and 3.42. The nth-order chemical reaction model was suitable to describe the lake sediment pyrolysis reaction well. The gaseous products of H2O, CO2, CO, CH4, and SO2 and several functional groups (C-H, C=O, and C-O) could be found from the IR spectrum. There were two evolution peaks for CO2 and one peak for CH4 and SO2. However, the evolution of CO always increased. Meanwhile, the evolution peaks for CO2, CH4, and SO2 all shifted to the low temperature region with the decrease of heating rate.



---

*Source: 1759602-2018-02-08.xml*