# αMSH Blunts Endotoxin-Induced MuRF1 and Atrogin-1 Upregulation in Skeletal Muscle by Modulating NF-κB and Akt/FoxO1 Pathway

Authors: Ana Isabel Martín; Ana Belén Gómez-SanMiguel; Carolina Gómez-Moreira; María Ángeles Villanúa; Asunción López-Calderón
Journal: Mediators of Inflammation
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone (αMSH) has been shown to have anti-inflammatory and anticachectic actions. We hypothesized that αMSH administration could attenuate the effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the skeletal muscle through modifications in IGF-Akt-FoxO1 pathway, or/and in serum corticosterone. Adult male Wistar rats were injected with LPS and/or αMSH. αMSH administration reduced LPS-induced increase in liver TNFα and serum nitrites as well as NF-κB activation in skeletal muscle. In contrast, αMSH was not able to prevent the stimulatory effect of LPS on serum concentration of ACTH and corticosterone. LPS decreased serum levels of IGF-I and IGFBP3 and their expression in the liver (P<0.01). However IGFBP3 expression in the gastrocnemius was increased by LPS. Treatment with αMSH prevented the effects of LPS on IGFBP3 but not on IGF-I. In the gastrocnemius αMSH blocked LPS-induced decrease in pAkt as well as the increase in pNF-κB(p65), FoxO1, atrogin-1, and MuRF1 levels. These results suggest that αMSH blunts skeletal muscle response to endotoxin by downregulating atrogenes and FoxO1 at least in part by controlling NF-κB activation and Akt signalling, but not through modifications in the secretion of corticosterone or IGF-I.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Inflammation induces skeletal muscle wasting leading to inflammatory cachexia that causes an increase in morbidity and mortality [1]. Critically ill patients with sepsis have a reduction in muscle mass within the first week [2]. This decrease in muscle mass is secondary to an increase in muscle proteolysis, whereas muscle protein synthesis rate does not seem to be affected [3]. Similarly, experimental sepsis induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration increases muscle proteolysis, but it does not decrease protein synthesis [4]. Of the major proteolytic systems, ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is increased, whereas calpain and caspase activities are not changed in sepsis [3]. Between the ubiquitin-proteasome system, two E3 ubiquitin ligases, muscle RING-finger protein-1 (MuRF1) and muscle atrophy F-box (MAFbx/atrogin-1), play an important role in muscle atrophy; they are called atrogenes and serve as early markers of skeletal muscle atrophy, aiding in the diagnosis of muscle disease [5]. Cytokines such as TNFα act as potent inducer of the inflammatory response transcription factor NF-κB that increases proteasome-dependent protein breakdown in skeletal muscle [6].The Forkhead box containing protein O-subclass (FoxOs) are transcription factors that regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. In their active unphosphorylated state, these proteins reside in the nucleus and promote gene expression of atrophy-stimulating genes such as atrogin-1 and MuRF1 [7]. Skeletal muscle FoxO nuclear localization and transcriptional activities are suppressed by insulin-like growth factor1 (IGF-I)/phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase (PI3 K)/protein kinase B (Akt) pathway. Phosphorylation of FoxOs by Akt induces translocation from the nucleus and inactivation by degradation in the cytosol. Atrogene induction through FoxO1 and FoxO3a activation is a crucial step in the process leading to muscle atrophy during sepsis [8]. In this sense, sepsis increases FoxO1 mRNA levels as well as nuclear FoxO1 levels and DNA binding activity in gastrocnemius muscle, but not in the heart [9, 10].Although muscle wasting during sepsis seems to be secondary to multiple factors, the increased release of proinflammatory cytokines and glucocorticoids and the decreased release of IGF-I are important mediators of inflammatory cachexia. Inflammatory stress induced by LPS increases a number of proinflammatory cytokines that are released into the blood stream to activate the innate immune response. LPS administration also has a profound effect on the neuroendocrine system, leading to an increase in glucocorticoid secretion along with a decrease in circulating IGF-I [11–13]. Glucocorticoids are potent mediators of muscle atrophy [14, 15], through atrogin-1 and MuRF1 upregulation [16]. IGF-I is an important regulator of muscle mass; in addition to stimulating muscle protein synthesis through activation of PI3 K and Akt, it also reduces the expression of atrogin-1 and MuRF1 by inhibiting FoxO transcription factors [17, 18]. Taking into account that the IGF-I/Akt pathway is a crucial regulator of muscle mass, the decrease in IGF-I levels together with the increase in serum glucocorticoids can be the mechanism by which sepsis induces muscle wasting.Alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone (αMSH) is a peptide that belongs to the melanocortins family that has many physiological functions, including immune function. αMSH has a potent anti-inflammatory activity; it decreases inflammatory mediators such as proinflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide production [19], whereas it increases anti-inflammatory cytokines [20]. It has been shown that the anti-inflammatory action of αMSH in a number of cell types is through blockade of NF-κB activation [20–22].αMSH has been shown to ameliorate the course of inflammatory illnesses in experimental animals such as endotoxin-induced hepatitis [23], inflammatory bowel disease [24] and adjuvant-induced arthritis [25]. In addition to its anti-inflammatory activity, we have reported that αMSH is also able to prevent arthritis-induced muscle wasting, decreasing MuRF1 and atrogin-1 levels in skeletal muscle [26]. The aim of the present study was to analyze whether peripheral αMSH administration is able to prevent endotoxin-induced increase in atrogin-1, MuRF1, and FoxO1 and to analyze the possible role played by the IGF-I system and by endogenous glucocorticoids.


## 2. Material and Methods

### 2.1.Animals

All procedures on animals were carried out according to the guidelines recommended by the EU for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the Complutense University Animal Care Committee (approval ID: CEA-UCM 16/12). Experimental design was performed to minimize suffering and the number of animals used. Male Wistar rats weighing 250–275 g were used in all experiments; they were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Barcelona, Spain). Rats were housed 2-3 per cage, under controlled conditions of temperature (22°C) and light (lights on from 07:30 to 19:30 h). Rats were quarantined for 1 week before any experimental use.Rats were randomly assigned to the following treatment groups of 10 rats and fed ad libitum: (1) control, i.p. injected with 250μL sterile saline, (2) control +   αMSH, i.p. injected with 100 μg/kg αMSH trifluoroacetate salt (Bachem, Bubendorf, Switzerland), (3) LPS, i.p. injected with 250 μg/kg LPS (serotype 055:B5, Sigma Chemical Co.), and (4) LPS + αMSH, which was simultaneously i.p. injected with both compounds in 250 μL saline. As LPS decreases food intake, a pair-fed (PF) group was added; it was injected with saline and received the same amount of food eaten by the group of rats injected with LPS. Rats received the treatments at 17:00 h and at 08:00 h the following day. This LPS administration protocol was shown to decrease levels of serum IGF-I and its mRNA in the liver [27]. All animals were euthanized by decapitation at 12:00 h, 19 h after the first, and 4 h after the second LPS and/or αMSH injection.Trunk blood was collected and allowed to clot, and the serum was stored at −20°C for IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH), corticosterone, and nitrite assays. Spleens were removed, dissected, and weighed; liver and gastrocnemius muscle were removed, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C for isolation of mRNA and proteins.


### 2.2. RNA Extraction and Real-Time PCR

RNA was extracted using UltraspecTM (Biotecx Laboratories Inc. Houston, Texas, USA). The final concentration of RNA was determined with a BioPhotometer (Eppendorf, Germany), and the integrity of the RNA was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using 1μg of total RNA and the Quantiscript Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen Combh Hilden, Valencia, CA, and USA). Real-time PCR for quantification of mRNA was performed on a SmartCycler (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) using a SYBR-Green protocol on the fluorescence temperature cycler. Each real-time PCR reaction consisted of 2.5 ng cDNA, 1x Takara SYBR Green Premix Ex Taq (Takara BIO INC, Otsu, Shiga, Japan), and 300 nM forward and reverse primers in a reaction volume of 25 μL. Primers for real-time PCR (Table 1) were obtained from Roche (Madrid, Spain) by using the EXIQON Universal Probe Library. The thermal cycling profile consisted of a preincubation step at 95°C for 10 s followed by 40 cycles of 95°C denaturation steps for 15 s, 60°C annealing steps for 30 s, and 72°C extension steps for 30 s. Results were expressed as fold changes in expression of each gene compared with control animals treated with saline using cycle threshold 2(ΔΔCT) method with 18S as reference gene.Table 1
Primers for real-time PCR.
Gene
Forward primer (5′ to 3′)
Reverse primer (5′ to 3′)
Product bp
18S
GGTGCATGGCCGTTCTTA
TCGTTCGTTATCGGAATTAACC
60
TNFα
TGAACTTCGGGGTGATCG
GGGCTTGTCACTCGAGTTTT
122
FoxO1
TCAGGCTAGGAGTTAGTGAGCA
GGGGTGAAGGGCATCTTT
95
Atrogin-1
GAACAGCAAAACCAAAACTCAGTA
GCTCCTTAGTACTCCCTTTGTGAA
74
MuRF1
TGTCTGGAGGTCGTTTCCG
ATGCCGGTCCATGATCACTT
58
IGF-I
GCTATGGCTCCAGCATTCG
TCCGGAAGCAACACTCATCC
62
IGFBP-3
GGAAAGACGACGTGCATTG
GCGTATTTGAGCTCCACGTT
78


### 2.3. Immunoblot

Gastrocnemius was homogenized in RIPA buffer (10μL/mg) with protease inhibitors cocktail, sodium deoxycholate 12.5 mM, phenylmethane sulfonyl fluoride 100 mM, sodium orthovanadate 12.5 mM, and with phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) for pAkt/Akt and pFoxO1/FoxO1. Because of the low endogenous levels of total FoxO1 in skeletal muscle, accurate quantification of FoxO1 following nuclear and cytosolic fractionation of whole muscle remains difficult. Therefore, we determined it in the total protein extract. The protein extracts were boiled for 5 min in a 1 : 1 volume of Laemmli loading buffer. Proteins (100 μg) were resolved by electrophoresis on 10–12% polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions and transferred onto nitrocellulose or polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, Madrid, Spain) that were blocked by incubation in 5% nonfat dry milk and 0.1% Tween (Sigma-Aldrich), in Tris-buffered saline. Ponceau-S staining was performed to ensure equal transfer prior to blocking. Membranes were probed overnight at 4°C sequentially with antibodies against pAkt (473), and pFoxO1 (256) (Cell Signalling Technology Inc, Boston, USA), Akt, FoxO1, NF-κBp65 (C20), pNF-κBp65 (536) and MuRF1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) with stripping of membranes, using stripping buffer (Restore Western Blot Stripping Buffer, Thermo-scientific Rockford, II, USA) before each new antibody. Membranes were incubated for 90 min in the appropriate secondary antibody conjugated to horseadish peroxidase (anti mouse IgG, Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK; anti rabbit IgG, GE Healthcare, Madrid, Spain; or anti goat IgG, Santa Cruz) and peroxidase activity was detected using enhanced chemiluminescent reagent (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Band intensities were quantified by densitometry using Gene Tools Analysis software.


### 2.4. Ligand Blot

Serum IGFBP3 levels were measured by ligand blot. Two microlitres of serum were diluted in sample buffer and boiled for 2 min at 90°C and loaded on to 1% SDS-12.5% polyacrylamide gels, and proteins were separated by electrophoresis under nonreducing conditions. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose sheets (HybondTM-C extra, Amersham, UK). The membranes were dried and blocked for 1 h with 5% nonfat dry milk, 0.1% Tween (Sigma-Aldrich), in Tris-buffered saline. Membranes were probed overnight at 4°C with125I-labelled IGF-I (1.5 × 106 cpm/mL). The nitrocellulose sheets were then washed, dried, and exposed at −80°C to X-ray film (Kodak X-Omat AR, Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). The film signals were quantified by densitometry using a PC-Image VGA24 program for Windows. The density of the IGFBP3 band in each lane was expressed as the percentage of the mean density of sera from control rats.


### 2.5. IGF-I, ACTH, Corticosterone, and TNFα Determinations

Serum IGF-I was measured using the antiserum to human IGF-I (UB2-495), from Dr. Underwood and Dr. Van Wik, and is distributed by the NIDDK Hormone Distribution Program through the National Hormone and Pituitary Program. Levels of IGF-I were expressed in terms of rat IGF-I from Gropep Ltd. (Adelaide, Australia). The intra-assay coefficient of variation was 8%. All samples from the same experiment were run in the same assay.Serum ACTH and corticosterone was analyzed by a commercial kit from MP Biomedicals, LLC (Orangeburg, NY, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocols. Liver TNFα was determined by ELISA with a kit from Amersham Biosciences (Barcelona, Spain).


### 2.6. Nitrite Determination

Nitrite and nitrate concentrations in serum were measured by a modified method of Griess assay [28]. Serum was deproteinized to reduce turbidity by centrifugation through a 30 kDa molecular weight filter using a Centrifree Micropartition Device with a YM-30 ultrafiltration membrane (Amicon Division, Millipore Corporation, Bedford, TX, USA), at 15000 rpm for 1 h at 37°C for 300 μL samples. One hundred μL of filtrated serum was mixed with 100 μL of vanadium chloride and was quickly followed by the addition of the Griess reagents. The determination was performed after incubation at 37°C for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm. Nitrite and nitrate concentrations were calculated using a NaNO2 standard curve.


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistics were computed using the statistics program STATGRAPHICS plus for Windows. Data are presented as means± standard error of the mean and were tested with analysis of variance (ANOVA);post-hoc comparisons were made using the LSD multiple range test. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.


## 2.1.Animals

All procedures on animals were carried out according to the guidelines recommended by the EU for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the Complutense University Animal Care Committee (approval ID: CEA-UCM 16/12). Experimental design was performed to minimize suffering and the number of animals used. Male Wistar rats weighing 250–275 g were used in all experiments; they were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Barcelona, Spain). Rats were housed 2-3 per cage, under controlled conditions of temperature (22°C) and light (lights on from 07:30 to 19:30 h). Rats were quarantined for 1 week before any experimental use.Rats were randomly assigned to the following treatment groups of 10 rats and fed ad libitum: (1) control, i.p. injected with 250μL sterile saline, (2) control +   αMSH, i.p. injected with 100 μg/kg αMSH trifluoroacetate salt (Bachem, Bubendorf, Switzerland), (3) LPS, i.p. injected with 250 μg/kg LPS (serotype 055:B5, Sigma Chemical Co.), and (4) LPS + αMSH, which was simultaneously i.p. injected with both compounds in 250 μL saline. As LPS decreases food intake, a pair-fed (PF) group was added; it was injected with saline and received the same amount of food eaten by the group of rats injected with LPS. Rats received the treatments at 17:00 h and at 08:00 h the following day. This LPS administration protocol was shown to decrease levels of serum IGF-I and its mRNA in the liver [27]. All animals were euthanized by decapitation at 12:00 h, 19 h after the first, and 4 h after the second LPS and/or αMSH injection.Trunk blood was collected and allowed to clot, and the serum was stored at −20°C for IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH), corticosterone, and nitrite assays. Spleens were removed, dissected, and weighed; liver and gastrocnemius muscle were removed, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C for isolation of mRNA and proteins.


## 2.2. RNA Extraction and Real-Time PCR

RNA was extracted using UltraspecTM (Biotecx Laboratories Inc. Houston, Texas, USA). The final concentration of RNA was determined with a BioPhotometer (Eppendorf, Germany), and the integrity of the RNA was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using 1μg of total RNA and the Quantiscript Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen Combh Hilden, Valencia, CA, and USA). Real-time PCR for quantification of mRNA was performed on a SmartCycler (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) using a SYBR-Green protocol on the fluorescence temperature cycler. Each real-time PCR reaction consisted of 2.5 ng cDNA, 1x Takara SYBR Green Premix Ex Taq (Takara BIO INC, Otsu, Shiga, Japan), and 300 nM forward and reverse primers in a reaction volume of 25 μL. Primers for real-time PCR (Table 1) were obtained from Roche (Madrid, Spain) by using the EXIQON Universal Probe Library. The thermal cycling profile consisted of a preincubation step at 95°C for 10 s followed by 40 cycles of 95°C denaturation steps for 15 s, 60°C annealing steps for 30 s, and 72°C extension steps for 30 s. Results were expressed as fold changes in expression of each gene compared with control animals treated with saline using cycle threshold 2(ΔΔCT) method with 18S as reference gene.Table 1
Primers for real-time PCR.
Gene
Forward primer (5′ to 3′)
Reverse primer (5′ to 3′)
Product bp
18S
GGTGCATGGCCGTTCTTA
TCGTTCGTTATCGGAATTAACC
60
TNFα
TGAACTTCGGGGTGATCG
GGGCTTGTCACTCGAGTTTT
122
FoxO1
TCAGGCTAGGAGTTAGTGAGCA
GGGGTGAAGGGCATCTTT
95
Atrogin-1
GAACAGCAAAACCAAAACTCAGTA
GCTCCTTAGTACTCCCTTTGTGAA
74
MuRF1
TGTCTGGAGGTCGTTTCCG
ATGCCGGTCCATGATCACTT
58
IGF-I
GCTATGGCTCCAGCATTCG
TCCGGAAGCAACACTCATCC
62
IGFBP-3
GGAAAGACGACGTGCATTG
GCGTATTTGAGCTCCACGTT
78


## 2.3. Immunoblot

Gastrocnemius was homogenized in RIPA buffer (10μL/mg) with protease inhibitors cocktail, sodium deoxycholate 12.5 mM, phenylmethane sulfonyl fluoride 100 mM, sodium orthovanadate 12.5 mM, and with phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) for pAkt/Akt and pFoxO1/FoxO1. Because of the low endogenous levels of total FoxO1 in skeletal muscle, accurate quantification of FoxO1 following nuclear and cytosolic fractionation of whole muscle remains difficult. Therefore, we determined it in the total protein extract. The protein extracts were boiled for 5 min in a 1 : 1 volume of Laemmli loading buffer. Proteins (100 μg) were resolved by electrophoresis on 10–12% polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions and transferred onto nitrocellulose or polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, Madrid, Spain) that were blocked by incubation in 5% nonfat dry milk and 0.1% Tween (Sigma-Aldrich), in Tris-buffered saline. Ponceau-S staining was performed to ensure equal transfer prior to blocking. Membranes were probed overnight at 4°C sequentially with antibodies against pAkt (473), and pFoxO1 (256) (Cell Signalling Technology Inc, Boston, USA), Akt, FoxO1, NF-κBp65 (C20), pNF-κBp65 (536) and MuRF1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) with stripping of membranes, using stripping buffer (Restore Western Blot Stripping Buffer, Thermo-scientific Rockford, II, USA) before each new antibody. Membranes were incubated for 90 min in the appropriate secondary antibody conjugated to horseadish peroxidase (anti mouse IgG, Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK; anti rabbit IgG, GE Healthcare, Madrid, Spain; or anti goat IgG, Santa Cruz) and peroxidase activity was detected using enhanced chemiluminescent reagent (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Band intensities were quantified by densitometry using Gene Tools Analysis software.


## 2.4. Ligand Blot

Serum IGFBP3 levels were measured by ligand blot. Two microlitres of serum were diluted in sample buffer and boiled for 2 min at 90°C and loaded on to 1% SDS-12.5% polyacrylamide gels, and proteins were separated by electrophoresis under nonreducing conditions. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose sheets (HybondTM-C extra, Amersham, UK). The membranes were dried and blocked for 1 h with 5% nonfat dry milk, 0.1% Tween (Sigma-Aldrich), in Tris-buffered saline. Membranes were probed overnight at 4°C with125I-labelled IGF-I (1.5 × 106 cpm/mL). The nitrocellulose sheets were then washed, dried, and exposed at −80°C to X-ray film (Kodak X-Omat AR, Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). The film signals were quantified by densitometry using a PC-Image VGA24 program for Windows. The density of the IGFBP3 band in each lane was expressed as the percentage of the mean density of sera from control rats.


## 2.5. IGF-I, ACTH, Corticosterone, and TNFα Determinations

Serum IGF-I was measured using the antiserum to human IGF-I (UB2-495), from Dr. Underwood and Dr. Van Wik, and is distributed by the NIDDK Hormone Distribution Program through the National Hormone and Pituitary Program. Levels of IGF-I were expressed in terms of rat IGF-I from Gropep Ltd. (Adelaide, Australia). The intra-assay coefficient of variation was 8%. All samples from the same experiment were run in the same assay.Serum ACTH and corticosterone was analyzed by a commercial kit from MP Biomedicals, LLC (Orangeburg, NY, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocols. Liver TNFα was determined by ELISA with a kit from Amersham Biosciences (Barcelona, Spain).


## 2.6. Nitrite Determination

Nitrite and nitrate concentrations in serum were measured by a modified method of Griess assay [28]. Serum was deproteinized to reduce turbidity by centrifugation through a 30 kDa molecular weight filter using a Centrifree Micropartition Device with a YM-30 ultrafiltration membrane (Amicon Division, Millipore Corporation, Bedford, TX, USA), at 15000 rpm for 1 h at 37°C for 300 μL samples. One hundred μL of filtrated serum was mixed with 100 μL of vanadium chloride and was quickly followed by the addition of the Griess reagents. The determination was performed after incubation at 37°C for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm. Nitrite and nitrate concentrations were calculated using a NaNO2 standard curve.


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistics were computed using the statistics program STATGRAPHICS plus for Windows. Data are presented as means± standard error of the mean and were tested with analysis of variance (ANOVA);post-hoc comparisons were made using the LSD multiple range test. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Anti-Inflammatory Activity ofαMSH Administration in Rats Injected with LPS

As shown in Figure1(a), LPS administration increased spleen weight (P<0.01) in rats treated with saline, but not in rats treated with αMSH. αMSH treatment to control rats did not modify spleen weight. LPS induced a significant increase in serum nitrite/nitrate levels (P<0.01 Figure 1(b)). αMSH decreased nitrite/nitrate levels (P<0.01) in rats treated with LPS, but not in control rats. Pair-feeding the rats did not modify spleen weight or serum nitrite levels. LPS administration also increased liver TNFα as well as its mRNA (P<0.01, Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). In rats treated with αMSH, LPS increased liver TNFα mRNA (P<0.05) but to lower levels (P<0.05) than those observed in rats injected with saline (Figure 1(c)). However, liver TNFα was not increased by LPS administration in rats treated with αMSH (Figure 1(d)). Liver TNFα mRNA and protein levels were similar in control rats treated with saline and in pair-fed rats.Effect of αMSH treatment (100μg/kg) on spleen weight (a), serum concentrations of nitrites/nitrates (b), liver TNFα mRNA (c) and liver TNFα protein (d) in control rats or in rats treated with LPS (250 μg/kg). PF = pair-fed rats. αMSH treatment decreased the stimulatory effect of LPS administration on spleen weight, serum concentration of nitrites + nitrates, liver TNFα, and liver TNFα mRNA. Results are expressed as means ± SEM for 6–10 rats per group. **P<0.01 and *P<0.05, LSD multiple comparisons test.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.2.αMSH Ameliorates LPS-Induced Decrease in Food Intake and Body Weight Gain

LPS administration decreased both food intake(P<0.01) and body weight (P<0.01, Table 2). This decrease in body weight gain is not only due to LPS-induced anorexia, since decrease in body weight gain was higher in the rats injected with LPS than in pair-fed rats (P<0.05). In control rats αMSH treatment did not modify food intake or body weight gain. However, αMSH treatment attenuated the inhibitory effect of LPS on food intake (P<0.05) and on body weight gain (P<0.01).Table 2
Effect of 0.1 mg/kgαMSH administration on body weight gain and food intake in control rats or in rats treated with 250 μg/kg LPS. PF = pair-fed rats. αMSH treatment attenuated the inhibitory effect of LPS administration on body weight gain and food intake. Results are expressed as means ± SEM for 10 rats per group. Values without the same letter are significantly different. LSD multiple comparisons test.
Body weight gain g/19 h
Food intakeg/19 h
Control-saline
4.3
±
0.6
a
18.6
±
0.35
a
Control-αMSH
6.1
±
0.7
a
20.3
±
0.45
a
LPS-saline
-
21.7
±
0.7
b
3.9
±
0.67
b
LPS-αMSH
-
14.3
±
3.6
c
6.5
±
1.4
c
PF
-
14.7
±
1.2
c
3.9


### 3.3. Serum ACTH and Corticosterone after LPS and/or αMSH Administration

Serum levels of corticosterone and ACTH were not significantly modified by pair-feeding the rats or by administering 100μg/kg αMSH to control rats (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). LPS administration increased serum levels of ACTH and corticosterone (P<0.01) in both groups of rats treated either with saline or with αMSH.Effect of αMSH treatment (100μg/kg) on serum concentration of corticosterone (a), ACTH (b), IGF-I (c), and IGFBP3 (d) in control rats or in rats treated with LPS (250 μg/kg). PF = pair-fed rats. LPS administration increased the serum concentrations of corticosterone and ACTH (P<0.01), whereas αMSH had no significant effect either in control or LPS treated rats. Serum concentrations of IGF1 were decreased by LPS administration in both groups of rats treated with either αMSH or saline (P<0.01). LPS treatment decreased serum concentration of IGFBP3 (P<0.01). αMSH treatment prevented the effect of LPS on serum IGFBP3. Pair-feeding the rats did not modify serum corticosterone, ACTH, IGF-I, or IGFBP3 levels. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM for n=8–10 rats per group. **P<0.01 and *P<0.05, LSD multiple comparisons test.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.4.αMSH Administration Prevents the Effect of LPS on IGFBP3 but Not on IGF-I Levels

In rats treated with saline, LPS decreased circulating levels of IGF-I and IGFBP3 (P<0.01, Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). αMSH administration prevented the inhibitory effect of LPS on circulating IGFBP3 levels, whereas it was unable to modify the effect of LPS on serum IGF-I levels. Neither serum concentrations of IGF-I nor IGFBP3 were affected by pair-feeding the rats or αMSH administration in control rats.As observed in circulating IGF-I and IGFBP3, LPS administration decreased IGF-I and IGFBP3 expression in the liver (P<0.01, Figures 3(a) and 3(c)). Treatment with αMSH did not modify the inhibitory effect of LPS on liver IGF-I mRNA. In contrast, αMSH attenuated LPS-induced decrease in liver IGFBP3, where the rats treated with LPS and αMSH had IGFBP3 mRNA levels between those of control rats and of the rats treated with LPS alone. Pair-feeding the rats or αMSH administration to control rats did not modify liver expression of IGF-I or IGFBP3.Effect of αMSH treatment (100μg/kg) on IGF-I mRNA in liver (a) and gastrocnemius muscle (b) and on IGFBP3 mRNA in liver (c) and gastrocnemius muscle (d) in control rats or in rats treated with LPS (250 μg/kg). PF = pair-fed rats. Liver IGF-I mRNA was decreased by LPS administration in both groups of rats treated with either αMSH or saline (P<0.01). LPS treatment decreased liver IGFBP3 mRNA (P<0.01), but it increased muscle IGFBP3 mRNA (P<0.01). αMSH treatment prevented the effect of LPS on muscle IGFBP3 mRNA, whereas it attenuated the inhibitory effect of LPS on liver IGFBP3 mRNA. Pair-feeding the rats did not modify IGF-I or IGFBP3 levels. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM for n= 8–10 rats per group. **P<0.01 and *P<0.05, LSD multiple comparisons test.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figures3(b) and 3(d) show IGF-I and IGFBP3 expression in the gastrocnemius muscle. LPS had a different effect on IGF-I and IGFBP3 mRNA in the gastrocnemius than in the liver. Gastrocnemius IGF-I mRNA was not significantly affected by LPS, αMSH, or by pair-feeding the rats (Figure 3(b)). In contrast, LPS administration increased IGFBP3 mRNA in the gastrocnemius muscle (P<0.05). αMSH treatment prevented the stimulatory effect of LPS on muscle IGFBP3, whereas it did not modify IGFBP3 mRNA in control rats.


### 3.5.αMSH Administration Prevents the Effect of LPS on NF-κB(p65), pAkt, FoxO1, MuRF1, and Atrogin-1 in the Gastrocnemius Muscle

The effects of LPS andαMSH administration on NF-κB(p65) and Akt in the gastrocnemius muscle are shown in Figures 4(a), 4(b), 4(c), and 4(d). LPS increased phosphoNF-κB(p65) in the rats treated with saline (P<0.01, Figure 4(a)) but not in those treated with αMSH. There were no modifications in gastrocnemius NF-κB(p65) levels in none of the experimental groups (Figure 4(b)). LPS had a negative effect on Akt signalling, since it decreased phosphoAkt levels (P<0.01, Figure 4(c)). αMSH treatment blocked the inhibitory effect of LPS on Akt phosphorylation. Neither αMSH nor pair-feeding the rats modified pAkt levels in the gastrocnemius muscle. All experimental groups had similar total Akt levels (Figure 4(d)).Figure 4
PhosphoNF-κB(p65) (a), NF-κB(p65) (b), phospho-Akt (c), and total-Akt (d) in gastrocnemius muscle of control, LPS and pair-fed (PF) rats treated with αMSH (100 μg/kg) or saline. LPS increased phosphoNF-κB(p65) (P<0.01) and decreased pAkt (P<0.01) in the rats treated with saline but not in rats treated with αMSH. Data represent mean ± SEM (n= 7–10 rats). **P<0.01 and *P<0.05, LSD multiple comparisons test.LPS-induced decrease in muscle pAkt levels was associated with an increase in the muscle content of the active transcription factor FoxO1, as well as in its mRNA levels (P<0.01, Figures 5(b) and 5(c)). αMSH treatment prevented the stimulatory effect of LPS on FoxO1 and FoxO1mRNA levels, since the rats treated with LPS and αMSH had lower FoxO1 content than the rats injected with LPS and saline and content similar to the levels of pair-fed rats. Pair-feeding the rats increased mean FoxO1 and its mRNA levels in the muscle, but this increase was not significant. LPS administration decreased pFoxO1 levels (P<0.05, Figure 5(a)). LPS also decreased pFoxO1 levels in the rats treated with αMSH, but the decrease was not significant in comparison to the levels of control rats treated with αMSH.PhosphoFoxO1 (a), total FoxO1 (b), and FoxO1 mRNA levels (c) in gastrocnemius muscle of control, LPS and pair-fed (PF) rats treated with αMSH (100μg/kg) or saline. LPS decreased pFoxO1 (P<0.05), whereas it increased FoxO1 and FoxO1 mRNA (P<0.01) in rats treated with saline. αMSH administration prevented LPS-induced increase in FoxO1 and its mRNA. Data represent mean ± SEM (n= 8–10 rats). **P<0.01 and *P<0.05, LSD multiple comparison test.
(a)
(b)
(c)Atrogenes expression coincides with the activity of the NF-κB and the Akt/FoxO1 pathway in the five groups of rats. Atrogin-1 mRNA was increased by LPS administration (P<0.01, Figure 6(a)). Rats treated with both LPS and αMSH had lower gastrocnemius atrogin-1 mRNA than rats that received LPS alone (P<0.01), and similar to pair-fed rats. LPS administration also increased muscle MuRF1 and its mRNA expression in the gastrocnemius muscle (P<0.01, Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). αMSH treatment blocked LPS-induced increase in MuRF1 and in its mRNA in the gastrocnemius muscle.Atrogin-1 mRNA (a), MuRF1 mRNA (b), and MuRF1 (c) in gastrocnemius muscle of control, LPS and pair-fed (PF) rats treated with αMSH (100μg/kg) or saline. LPS increased atrogin-1, MuRF1, and MuRF1 mRNA levels (P<0.01), and αMSH administration prevented those increases. Data represent mean ± SEM (n= 7–10 rats). **P<0.01 and *P<0.05, LSD multiple comparison test.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.1. Anti-Inflammatory Activity ofαMSH Administration in Rats Injected with LPS

As shown in Figure1(a), LPS administration increased spleen weight (P<0.01) in rats treated with saline, but not in rats treated with αMSH. αMSH treatment to control rats did not modify spleen weight. LPS induced a significant increase in serum nitrite/nitrate levels (P<0.01 Figure 1(b)). αMSH decreased nitrite/nitrate levels (P<0.01) in rats treated with LPS, but not in control rats. Pair-feeding the rats did not modify spleen weight or serum nitrite levels. LPS administration also increased liver TNFα as well as its mRNA (P<0.01, Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). In rats treated with αMSH, LPS increased liver TNFα mRNA (P<0.05) but to lower levels (P<0.05) than those observed in rats injected with saline (Figure 1(c)). However, liver TNFα was not increased by LPS administration in rats treated with αMSH (Figure 1(d)). Liver TNFα mRNA and protein levels were similar in control rats treated with saline and in pair-fed rats.Effect of αMSH treatment (100μg/kg) on spleen weight (a), serum concentrations of nitrites/nitrates (b), liver TNFα mRNA (c) and liver TNFα protein (d) in control rats or in rats treated with LPS (250 μg/kg). PF = pair-fed rats. αMSH treatment decreased the stimulatory effect of LPS administration on spleen weight, serum concentration of nitrites + nitrates, liver TNFα, and liver TNFα mRNA. Results are expressed as means ± SEM for 6–10 rats per group. **P<0.01 and *P<0.05, LSD multiple comparisons test.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.2.αMSH Ameliorates LPS-Induced Decrease in Food Intake and Body Weight Gain

LPS administration decreased both food intake(P<0.01) and body weight (P<0.01, Table 2). This decrease in body weight gain is not only due to LPS-induced anorexia, since decrease in body weight gain was higher in the rats injected with LPS than in pair-fed rats (P<0.05). In control rats αMSH treatment did not modify food intake or body weight gain. However, αMSH treatment attenuated the inhibitory effect of LPS on food intake (P<0.05) and on body weight gain (P<0.01).Table 2
Effect of 0.1 mg/kgαMSH administration on body weight gain and food intake in control rats or in rats treated with 250 μg/kg LPS. PF = pair-fed rats. αMSH treatment attenuated the inhibitory effect of LPS administration on body weight gain and food intake. Results are expressed as means ± SEM for 10 rats per group. Values without the same letter are significantly different. LSD multiple comparisons test.
Body weight gain g/19 h
Food intakeg/19 h
Control-saline
4.3
±
0.6
a
18.6
±
0.35
a
Control-αMSH
6.1
±
0.7
a
20.3
±
0.45
a
LPS-saline
-
21.7
±
0.7
b
3.9
±
0.67
b
LPS-αMSH
-
14.3
±
3.6
c
6.5
±
1.4
c
PF
-
14.7
±
1.2
c
3.9


## 3.3. Serum ACTH and Corticosterone after LPS and/or αMSH Administration

Serum levels of corticosterone and ACTH were not significantly modified by pair-feeding the rats or by administering 100μg/kg αMSH to control rats (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). LPS administration increased serum levels of ACTH and corticosterone (P<0.01) in both groups of rats treated either with saline or with αMSH.Effect of αMSH treatment (100μg/kg) on serum concentration of corticosterone (a), ACTH (b), IGF-I (c), and IGFBP3 (d) in control rats or in rats treated with LPS (250 μg/kg). PF = pair-fed rats. LPS administration increased the serum concentrations of corticosterone and ACTH (P<0.01), whereas αMSH had no significant effect either in control or LPS treated rats. Serum concentrations of IGF1 were decreased by LPS administration in both groups of rats treated with either αMSH or saline (P<0.01). LPS treatment decreased serum concentration of IGFBP3 (P<0.01). αMSH treatment prevented the effect of LPS on serum IGFBP3. Pair-feeding the rats did not modify serum corticosterone, ACTH, IGF-I, or IGFBP3 levels. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM for n=8–10 rats per group. **P<0.01 and *P<0.05, LSD multiple comparisons test.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.4.αMSH Administration Prevents the Effect of LPS on IGFBP3 but Not on IGF-I Levels

In rats treated with saline, LPS decreased circulating levels of IGF-I and IGFBP3 (P<0.01, Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). αMSH administration prevented the inhibitory effect of LPS on circulating IGFBP3 levels, whereas it was unable to modify the effect of LPS on serum IGF-I levels. Neither serum concentrations of IGF-I nor IGFBP3 were affected by pair-feeding the rats or αMSH administration in control rats.As observed in circulating IGF-I and IGFBP3, LPS administration decreased IGF-I and IGFBP3 expression in the liver (P<0.01, Figures 3(a) and 3(c)). Treatment with αMSH did not modify the inhibitory effect of LPS on liver IGF-I mRNA. In contrast, αMSH attenuated LPS-induced decrease in liver IGFBP3, where the rats treated with LPS and αMSH had IGFBP3 mRNA levels between those of control rats and of the rats treated with LPS alone. Pair-feeding the rats or αMSH administration to control rats did not modify liver expression of IGF-I or IGFBP3.Effect of αMSH treatment (100μg/kg) on IGF-I mRNA in liver (a) and gastrocnemius muscle (b) and on IGFBP3 mRNA in liver (c) and gastrocnemius muscle (d) in control rats or in rats treated with LPS (250 μg/kg). PF = pair-fed rats. Liver IGF-I mRNA was decreased by LPS administration in both groups of rats treated with either αMSH or saline (P<0.01). LPS treatment decreased liver IGFBP3 mRNA (P<0.01), but it increased muscle IGFBP3 mRNA (P<0.01). αMSH treatment prevented the effect of LPS on muscle IGFBP3 mRNA, whereas it attenuated the inhibitory effect of LPS on liver IGFBP3 mRNA. Pair-feeding the rats did not modify IGF-I or IGFBP3 levels. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM for n= 8–10 rats per group. **P<0.01 and *P<0.05, LSD multiple comparisons test.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figures3(b) and 3(d) show IGF-I and IGFBP3 expression in the gastrocnemius muscle. LPS had a different effect on IGF-I and IGFBP3 mRNA in the gastrocnemius than in the liver. Gastrocnemius IGF-I mRNA was not significantly affected by LPS, αMSH, or by pair-feeding the rats (Figure 3(b)). In contrast, LPS administration increased IGFBP3 mRNA in the gastrocnemius muscle (P<0.05). αMSH treatment prevented the stimulatory effect of LPS on muscle IGFBP3, whereas it did not modify IGFBP3 mRNA in control rats.


## 3.5.αMSH Administration Prevents the Effect of LPS on NF-κB(p65), pAkt, FoxO1, MuRF1, and Atrogin-1 in the Gastrocnemius Muscle

The effects of LPS andαMSH administration on NF-κB(p65) and Akt in the gastrocnemius muscle are shown in Figures 4(a), 4(b), 4(c), and 4(d). LPS increased phosphoNF-κB(p65) in the rats treated with saline (P<0.01, Figure 4(a)) but not in those treated with αMSH. There were no modifications in gastrocnemius NF-κB(p65) levels in none of the experimental groups (Figure 4(b)). LPS had a negative effect on Akt signalling, since it decreased phosphoAkt levels (P<0.01, Figure 4(c)). αMSH treatment blocked the inhibitory effect of LPS on Akt phosphorylation. Neither αMSH nor pair-feeding the rats modified pAkt levels in the gastrocnemius muscle. All experimental groups had similar total Akt levels (Figure 4(d)).Figure 4
PhosphoNF-κB(p65) (a), NF-κB(p65) (b), phospho-Akt (c), and total-Akt (d) in gastrocnemius muscle of control, LPS and pair-fed (PF) rats treated with αMSH (100 μg/kg) or saline. LPS increased phosphoNF-κB(p65) (P<0.01) and decreased pAkt (P<0.01) in the rats treated with saline but not in rats treated with αMSH. Data represent mean ± SEM (n= 7–10 rats). **P<0.01 and *P<0.05, LSD multiple comparisons test.LPS-induced decrease in muscle pAkt levels was associated with an increase in the muscle content of the active transcription factor FoxO1, as well as in its mRNA levels (P<0.01, Figures 5(b) and 5(c)). αMSH treatment prevented the stimulatory effect of LPS on FoxO1 and FoxO1mRNA levels, since the rats treated with LPS and αMSH had lower FoxO1 content than the rats injected with LPS and saline and content similar to the levels of pair-fed rats. Pair-feeding the rats increased mean FoxO1 and its mRNA levels in the muscle, but this increase was not significant. LPS administration decreased pFoxO1 levels (P<0.05, Figure 5(a)). LPS also decreased pFoxO1 levels in the rats treated with αMSH, but the decrease was not significant in comparison to the levels of control rats treated with αMSH.PhosphoFoxO1 (a), total FoxO1 (b), and FoxO1 mRNA levels (c) in gastrocnemius muscle of control, LPS and pair-fed (PF) rats treated with αMSH (100μg/kg) or saline. LPS decreased pFoxO1 (P<0.05), whereas it increased FoxO1 and FoxO1 mRNA (P<0.01) in rats treated with saline. αMSH administration prevented LPS-induced increase in FoxO1 and its mRNA. Data represent mean ± SEM (n= 8–10 rats). **P<0.01 and *P<0.05, LSD multiple comparison test.
(a)
(b)
(c)Atrogenes expression coincides with the activity of the NF-κB and the Akt/FoxO1 pathway in the five groups of rats. Atrogin-1 mRNA was increased by LPS administration (P<0.01, Figure 6(a)). Rats treated with both LPS and αMSH had lower gastrocnemius atrogin-1 mRNA than rats that received LPS alone (P<0.01), and similar to pair-fed rats. LPS administration also increased muscle MuRF1 and its mRNA expression in the gastrocnemius muscle (P<0.01, Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). αMSH treatment blocked LPS-induced increase in MuRF1 and in its mRNA in the gastrocnemius muscle.Atrogin-1 mRNA (a), MuRF1 mRNA (b), and MuRF1 (c) in gastrocnemius muscle of control, LPS and pair-fed (PF) rats treated with αMSH (100μg/kg) or saline. LPS increased atrogin-1, MuRF1, and MuRF1 mRNA levels (P<0.01), and αMSH administration prevented those increases. Data represent mean ± SEM (n= 7–10 rats). **P<0.01 and *P<0.05, LSD multiple comparison test.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 4. Discussion

Our data show that αMSH treatment was not able to modify the stimulatory effect of LPS on circulating ACTH and corticosterone or the inhibitory effect of LPS on circulating and liver IGF-I. However, αMSH treatment induced anti-inflammatory changes in liver and muscle and prevented negative effects of LPS on skeletal muscle, such as inhibition of Akt phosphorylation and increase in IGFBP3 expression and in FoxO1, atrogin-1, and MuRF1 levels in the gastrocnemius muscle.As previously reported [19, 20] αMSH prevented the increase in liver TNFα after LPS injection. The anti-inflammatory effect of αMSH was also evidenced by the ability of this hormone to decrease LPS-induced increase in spleen weight and serum concentration of nitrites/nitrates and to prevent NF-κB phosphorylation in muscle after LPS administration.In accordance with data we have previously reported in arthritic rats [26], peripheral αMSH treatment attenuated LPS-induced anorexia and the decrease in body weight gain. On the contrary, intracerebroventricular administration of αMSH potentiates LPS-induced reduction in food intake during 6 h [29]. Those data and the fact that systemic αMSH treatment did not decrease food intake in control rats (present data and [26]) suggest that the ability of systemic αMSH to cross the blood brain barrier is low, as it has previously been reported [30], and the effects we observed are exerted at peripheral level.In spite of its anti-inflammatory effect, peripheral administration of αMSH was not able to decrease the stimulatory effect of LPS administration on the adrenal axis. However, when centrally administered, αMSH has been reported to decrease the stimulatory effect of LPS on serum corticosterone levels, at a very low dosage [31, 32]. In addition, αMSH is not able to prevent the stimulatory effect of CRH on pituitary ACTH, suggesting a hypothalamic rather than pituitary site of action of αMSH on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis [32].In contrast to our data, an inhibitory effect of peripheral αMSH administration on LPS-induced increase in ACTH has been reported in mice [33]. Discrepancies can be due to the fact that these authors used a higher dosage of αMSH. We tested a higher dosage of αMSH (200 μg/kg), and again peripheral αMSH administration was not able to prevent the effect of LPS on circulating IGF-I, ACTH, and corticosterone (author’s unpublished observation). Another possibility is that αMSH decreases the response to LPS within the first few minutes after administration. In this sense, Huang et al. [34] reported that in rats, 100 μg/kg αMSH partially blocks the stimulatory effect of LPS, since it prevents the increase in plasma corticosterone 60 min but not 30 or 120 min after LPS administration. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude that at a higher dosage peripheral administration of αMSH may be able to prevent the stimulatory effect of LPS on corticosterone levels.As previously reported [11, 12, 27], LPS administration decreased circulating IGF-I and IGBP3 and their gene expression in the liver. Similar data have also recently been reported in septic patients [35]. LPS decreases serum IGF-I, acting both in the liver and at a central level [36, 37]. The effects of αMSH treatment on serum levels of IGF-I and IGFBP3 in rats injected with LPS were different, since αMSH was not able to modify the inhibitory effect of LPS on IGF-I, whereas it prevented the LPS-induced decrease in serum IGFBP3 and its expression in the liver. The different responses of both proteins to αMSH treatment may be due to the fact that they are regulated differently [38–40]. In addition, they are produced by different liver cells, whereas IGF-I is mainly produced in hepatocytes, IGFBP3 expression is only found in nonparenchymal cells [38, 41]. The effect of αMSH on liver IGFBP3 can be exerted directly, since liver cells express all αMSH receptors (MCRs) and their expression is upregulated during the acute phase response [42]. In addition, αMSH inhibits endotoxin-induced upregulation of the acute-phase cytokines (interleukin1 (IL1), IL6, and TNFα) in isolated Kupffer cells [42]. Therefore, αMSH can prevent LPS-induced decrease in IGFBP3 synthesis by nonparenchymal cells, although it is not able to prevent the decrease in IGF-I expression.In contrast to the effect of LPS on liver IGFBP3 expression, local expression of IGBP3 was increased in skeletal muscle by LPS administration. These data indicate that regulation of IGFBP3 varies depending on the tissue. In chronic inflammation induced by arthritis we have found that IGFBP3 expression is also increased in the gastrocnemius muscle but not in the liver [43]. An increase in muscle IGFBP3 has also been reported 2 days after muscle injury, during the early phase of regeneration when muscle is invaded by inflammatory cells, especially by macrophages [44]. In peripheral tissues local IGFBP3 is a well-documented inhibitor of cell growth and/or promoter of apoptosis by a non-IGF-dependent mechanism (for review see [45]). IGFBP3 is produced by myogenic cell cultures and it suppresses proliferation in an IGF-dependent and -independent manner [46]. Accordingly, the increased expression of IGFBP3 in skeletal muscle can contribute to inflammation-induced muscle wasting. As in the case of circulating levels of IGFBP3, αMSH treatment was able to prevent LPS-induced increase in muscle IGFBP3 expression.In the gastrocnemius muscle LPS decreased pAkt, whereas it increased pNF-κB(p65) and FoxO1 active protein and its mRNA. These data are in accordance with those previously reported by other authors [9, 47, 48]. As expected, the decrease in pAkt and the increase in pNF-κB and FoxO1 protein were associated with an increased expression in both atrogenes atrogin-1 and MuRF1. Treatment with αMSH prevented the effects of LPS on the muscle: the decrease in Akt phosphorylation and the increase in NF-κB(p65) phosphorylation and FoxO1, MuRF1, and atrogin-1, reaching levels similar to those found in pair-fed rats. All these data indicate that αMSH administration blocks LPS-induced alterations in Akt/FoxO1 signalling and downstream gene targets of FoxO1, atrogin-1, and MuRF1 in gastrocnemius muscle. Similarly, in arthritic rats, αMSH administration prevents upregulation of both atrogin-1 and MuRF1 [26].Taking into account that αMSH treatment prevented the inhibitory effect of LPS on pAkt in the gastrocnemius, we expected that αMSH would be able to modify the inhibitory effect of LPS on IGF-I. However, αMSH administration was unable to prevent LPS-induced decrease in serum and liver IGF-I expression. The possibility exists that normalization of Akt activity in gastrocnemius of the rats treated with LPS and αMSH is related to normalization of NF-κB activity and/or to muscle IGFBP3 levels. There are several data indicating that IGFBP3 can play an inhibitory role in the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway in different types of cancer cells, through an IGF-independent effect [49, 50]. IGFBP3 also decreases Akt phosphorylation in noncancer cell cultures such as adipocytes [51].Although αMSH did not modify the effect of LPS on the main hormones related to muscle wasting (IGF-I and corticosterone), it had anti-inflammatory actions, and in the skeletal muscle it prevented the decrease in pAkt levels, the activation of NF-κB and FoxO1, and the upregulation of atrogin-1 and MuRF1. Because we analyzed the acute effects of LPS treatment, it was not possible to measure muscle atrophy. However, in arthritic rats chronic αMSH treatment decreases both muscle wasting and inflammation [26], in spite of not preventing the increase in serum concentrations of corticosterone and ACTH or the decrease in serum concentration of IGF-I (authors’ unpublished observation). Another treatment that shows anti-inflammatory and anticachectic effects in arthritic rats is the PPAR-α agonist fenofibrate. Fenofibrate administration decreases skeletal muscle atrophy [52], but it is also unable to prevent the effects of arthritis on serum IGF-I and corticosterone levels [43].It has been postulated that stimulation of muscle proteolysis requires two events, increased circulating glucocorticoid and/or impaired insulin signalling [53]. PI3K/Akt pathway, which had previously been shown to be sufficient to induce hypertrophy via activation of protein synthesis pathways, can also dominantly suppress the activation of atrophy pathways, determined by the induction of atrophy markers MuRF1 and atrogin-1 [54]. IGF-I, activated PI3K, or activated Akt is sufficient to inhibit the upregulation of MuRF1 and atrogin-1 induced by the glucocorticoid dexamethasone [18]. In our data, the preventive effect of αMSH on LPS-induced increase in atrogin-1 and MuRF1 levels can be explained by the normalization of NF-κB and Akt/FoxO1 pathways. This can be secondary to a reduced release of cytokines, as reflected by the normalization of pNF-κB levels, and/or to the normalization of IGFBP3 levels in the gastrocnemius.


## 5. Conclusion

Our data suggest that in rats injected with LPS,αMSH exerts anti-inflammatory and antiproteolytic activities in skeletal muscle downregulating FoxO1 and atrogene activation at least in part by controlling NF-κB and Akt activation. These results support αMSH as a novel potential therapeutic agent for clinical use in patients with sepsis that show a reduction in muscle mass. The pathways through which α-MSH blunts muscle wasting should be clarified by future studies analyzing the possible melanocortin receptors involved.



---

*Source: 179368-2014-09-09.xml*