# Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Hot-PressedMoSi2-Matrix Composites Reinforced with SiC and Si3N4 Particles

Authors: Hongming Zhou; Jian Li; Danqing Yi
Journal: ISRN Materials Science
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

MoSi2-matrix composites reinforced with Si3N4 and SiC particles were fabricated by means of wet-mixing and heat-pressing process. Scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), polarizing microscopy, Vickers hardness tester, with a universal materials testing machine were used to investigate the morphology, grain size, hardness, fracture toughness, and bending strength of the synthesized composites. Notable effects on the bending strength and fracture toughness of MoSi2 caused by the addition of SiC and Si3N4 particles were found. The MoSi2 composite with 20 vol.% SiC and 20 vol.% Si3N4 particles has the highest strength and toughness, which is about 100% and 340%, respectively, higher than that of pure MoSi2. The grain size of MoSi2 decreases gradually with the volume content of SiC and Si3N4 particles increasing from 0% to 40%, and MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4 composite exhibits the minimum grain size of MoSi2. The relationship between the grain size of MoSi2 and bending strength is not entirely fit with Hall-Petch equation. The strengthening mechanisms of the composite include fine-grain strengthening and dispersion strengthening. The toughening mechanisms of the composite include fine grain, microcracking, crack deflection, crack microbridging, and crack branching.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

MoSi2 has been investigated as potential material for high temperature structural applications and for application in the electronics industry. Its properties provide a desirable combination of a high melting temperature (2030°C), high modulus (440 GPa), good oxidation resistance in air, a relatively low density (6.24 g/cm3) [1], and the ability to undergo plastic deformation above 1200°C [2]. Combined with good thermal and electric conductivities, these properties have led to the utilization of MoSi2 as a heating element material in high-temperature furnaces operating in air up to about 1700°C [3, 4].However, as in the case of many such compounds, the current concern about these materials focuses on their low fracture toughness below the ductile-brittle transition temperature [5, 6]. To improve the mechanical properties of these materials, the addition of a second phase to form composites [7–10] has been found to be effective. Silicon nitride (Si3N4) has a high thermal shock resistance, due to its low thermal expansion coefficient and good resistance to oxidation when compared to other structural materials [11–13]. The isothermal oxidation resistance of the NbSi2-40 vol% Si3N4 composite prepared by the spark plasma sintering (SPS) process in dry air at 1300°C was superior to that of monolithic NbSi2 compact since the composite contained a larger amount of Si, which made it easier to form dense SiO2 scale [14]. The fracture toughness of MoSi2 + Si3N4 composites has been found to increase significantly with increasing temperature, reaching values as high as 15 MPa·m1/2 at 1300°C [15]. Also the addition SiC had a significant influence on the behavior of MoSi2, by forming a protective SiO2 layer leading to its exhibiting outstanding oxidation resistance [16].  As a matter of fact, MoSi2 and SiC are compatible and stable up to 1600°C. Bhattacharya and Petrovic [17] examined the hardness and indentation fracture toughness of a SiC-particle-reinforced MoSi2 composite. Suzuki and coworkers [18] successfully improved the mechanical properties, the flexural strength in particular, of SiC-nanoparticle-reinforced MoSi2-matrix nanocomposites. Therefore, Si3N4 and SiC may be the most promising additives for use as reinforcing material for metal silicide-based composites. However, there are few papers [19] reporting the addition of SiC and Si3N4 particles to improve the strength, toughness, and decrease the possibility of pest disintegration of MoSi2.In this study, MoSi2-matrix composites reinforced with Si3N4 and SiC particles were fabricated by means of wet-mixing and heat-pressing process. The morphology, grain size, hardness, fracture toughness, and bending strength of the synthesized composites were evaluated. The effects of Si3N4 and SiC contents on these properties were examined. And the mechanisms of strengthening and toughening MoSi2 by adding Si3N4 and SiC particles were also investigated.


## 2. Experimental Procedure

### 2.1. Materials and Preparation Process

A mixture of 99.9% pure MoSi2 (<2.5 μm), 98.5% pure SiC (<0.5 μm), 99% pure Si3N4 (<1 μm) was used for the preparation of monolithic MoSi2 and its composites in the present study. The powder mixture was wet mixed in ethyl alcohol and milled for 48 h. The milling process was realized by rolling a 500 mL cylindrical container made of agate on a planetary ball-milling machine, in which the balls of  Φ 10 mm made of agate and the powder mixture had a mass ratio of about 20 : 1, and the gas atmosphere was argon. The compositions of the target composites were (a) MoSi2; (b) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC; (c) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4; (d) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4; (e) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4. The resulting powders were hot pressed in a graphite die at 1700°C for 30 min under 30 MPa pressure. The dimensions of the consolidated samples were 52 mm in diameter and 6–10 mm in thickness. Similar conditions were employed to prepare monolithic MoSi2. The bulk density of the sample was measured by the Archimedes method with an immersion medium of deionized water.


### 2.2. Microstructure Analysis

Crystal-phase identification of the synthesized samples was determined by X-ray diffractometry (XRD, RIGAKU D/Max-rB) with Ni-filtered CuKa radiation (0.1542 nm) at a scan rate of 4°/min. Using a Sirion200 field emission scanning electron microscope, the microstructures of the synthesized samples were analyzed. The grain sizes of MoSi2 of the synthesized samples were analyzed by polarizing microscopy and the transversal method.


### 2.3. Mechanical Property Test

Vickers hardness of MoSi2 and MoSi2-based composites was measured with a HV-10 A Vickers hardness tester under the load of 49 N for 10 s. Indentation fracture toughness (K1c) was calculated by using an Anstis mode [20] and described as(1)K1c=A(EH)1/2(PC3/2),
where A is a constant 0.016, H the hardness, P the indentation load, C the average of the four surface radial cracks,  and E the elastic modulus of MoSi2 and MoSi2-based composites. The value of H is the Vickers hardness (Hv), given by [21](2)Hv=P2b2,
where b is the length value of each indent diagonal. The average values of 16 indentation diagonals and 32 radial crack lengths from the eight indentations on the surface of sample were used for the calculation of fracture toughness and hardness under the same load. The composite specimens for measurement of three-point bend strength were of size 3 mm × 4 mm × 36 mm. A self-aligning bend fixture made of hardened tool steel was used for measurement of bend strength on an Instron test frame at room temperature.


## 2.1. Materials and Preparation Process

A mixture of 99.9% pure MoSi2 (<2.5 μm), 98.5% pure SiC (<0.5 μm), 99% pure Si3N4 (<1 μm) was used for the preparation of monolithic MoSi2 and its composites in the present study. The powder mixture was wet mixed in ethyl alcohol and milled for 48 h. The milling process was realized by rolling a 500 mL cylindrical container made of agate on a planetary ball-milling machine, in which the balls of  Φ 10 mm made of agate and the powder mixture had a mass ratio of about 20 : 1, and the gas atmosphere was argon. The compositions of the target composites were (a) MoSi2; (b) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC; (c) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4; (d) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4; (e) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4. The resulting powders were hot pressed in a graphite die at 1700°C for 30 min under 30 MPa pressure. The dimensions of the consolidated samples were 52 mm in diameter and 6–10 mm in thickness. Similar conditions were employed to prepare monolithic MoSi2. The bulk density of the sample was measured by the Archimedes method with an immersion medium of deionized water.


## 2.2. Microstructure Analysis

Crystal-phase identification of the synthesized samples was determined by X-ray diffractometry (XRD, RIGAKU D/Max-rB) with Ni-filtered CuKa radiation (0.1542 nm) at a scan rate of 4°/min. Using a Sirion200 field emission scanning electron microscope, the microstructures of the synthesized samples were analyzed. The grain sizes of MoSi2 of the synthesized samples were analyzed by polarizing microscopy and the transversal method.


## 2.3. Mechanical Property Test

Vickers hardness of MoSi2 and MoSi2-based composites was measured with a HV-10 A Vickers hardness tester under the load of 49 N for 10 s. Indentation fracture toughness (K1c) was calculated by using an Anstis mode [20] and described as(1)K1c=A(EH)1/2(PC3/2),
where A is a constant 0.016, H the hardness, P the indentation load, C the average of the four surface radial cracks,  and E the elastic modulus of MoSi2 and MoSi2-based composites. The value of H is the Vickers hardness (Hv), given by [21](2)Hv=P2b2,
where b is the length value of each indent diagonal. The average values of 16 indentation diagonals and 32 radial crack lengths from the eight indentations on the surface of sample were used for the calculation of fracture toughness and hardness under the same load. The composite specimens for measurement of three-point bend strength were of size 3 mm × 4 mm × 36 mm. A self-aligning bend fixture made of hardened tool steel was used for measurement of bend strength on an Instron test frame at room temperature.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Microstructure

Figure1 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of MoSi2, MoSi2-20 vol% SiC composite, and MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4 composite. As seen in Figure 1, the prepared composites mainly consist of the phases including MoSi2 and reinforcing agents such as Si3N4 and SiC, and a small amount of Mo5Si3. Among these phases, Mo5Si3 should be generated from the reaction (see (3)) between MoSi2 and oxygen under high hot-pressing temperature (1700°C) [22]. The peaks of SiO2 were not observed in Figure 1, which may be attributed to the low content of SiO2 in the prepared samples(3)5MoSi2+7O2=Mo5Si3+7SiO2.XRD pattern of the prepared composites. (a) MoSi2, (b) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC, (c) MoSi2-20 vol% Si3N4-20 vol% SiC.
(a)(b)(c)Figure2 shows the backscattered electron images of the MoSi2-20 vol% SiC, MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4, MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4, and MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4 compacts. Figure 2 reveals a dense microstructure of the composite, which is consistent with the density analysis results of these samples (Table 1). Figure 2(a) indicates that the microstructure of monolithic MoSi2 is composed of gray zone (MoSi2), white zone (Mo5Si3), and black zone (SiO2). It can be seen from Figures 2(b), 2(c), 2(d), and 2(e) that the microstructure of MoSi2-based composites consists of gray zone (MoSi2), white zone (Mo5Si3), and black zone (Si3N4 and SiC) dispersed in the grain boundary of MoSi2. These results indicate that no chemical reaction occurs among MoSi2, SiC, and Si3N4 under the hot-pressing conditions; this is a precondition for preparing MoSi2-based composites with excellent properties.Table 1
Mechanical properties and densities of the prepared samples.
SampleDensity/%Bending strength/MPaFracture toughness/MPa·m1/2Vickers hardness/GPaMoSi298.62163.18.1MoSi2-20 vol% SiC98.33358.29.3MoSi2-20 vol% SiC -10 vol% Si3N497.63889.410.5MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N496.342710.411.4MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N495.23968.911.8SEM analysis on the microstructure of the prepared samples (backscattering imaging). (a) MoSi2; (b) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC; (c) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4; (d) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4; (e) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


### 3.2. Mechanical Properties and Densities of the Prepared Samples

The bulk densities and mechanical properties of the hot-pressed samples were listed in Table1. The elastic modulus (E) of MoSi2-Si3N4/SiC composites was calculated as follows:(4)E=EmVm+EfVf+EwVw,
where Em is the elastic modulus of polycrystalline MoSi2 (440 MPa), Ef the elastic modulus of Si3N4 (300 MPa), Ew the elastic modulus of SiC (448 MPa),  Vm,Vf,Vw, the volume fractions of MoSi2, Si3N4, and SiC, respectively [23].It can be seen from Table1 that the relative densities of the hot-pressed samples are above 95% and decrease slowly with the increasing of reinforcing agent contents, which means that high-density MoSi2 could be obtained by the hot-pressing process. Table 1 also indicates that the bending strength, fracture toughness, and Vickers hardness of the MoSi2-based composites are better than that of monolithic MoSi2 and increase gradually with the increase of Si3N4 and SiC content in the range of 0–40 vol.%. Among these prepared samples, MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4 composite exhibits the highest bending strength (427 MPa) and fracture toughness (10.4 MPa·m1/2), which may be due to the fact that it has the smallest grain size of MoSi2 (4.1 μm, see Table 2) and relatively high density. The bending strength and fracture toughness of the MoSi2-20 vol%SiC-30 vol%Si3N4 composite are lower than that of the MoSi2-20 vol%SiC-20 vol%Si3N4 composite, which may be attributed to its relatively large grain size of MoSi2(4.7 μm, see Table 2) and high Si3N4 content leading to the decreasing of its density.Table 2
MoSi2 grain sizes of the prepared samples.
SampleMoSi2MoSi2-20 vol% SiCMoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4MoSi2 grain size/μm18.610.26.54.14.7


### 3.3. Investigation of Strengthening and Toughening Mechanism of MoSi2-Based Composites

#### 3.3.1. Strengthening Mechanism

Figure3 shows the fracture morphologies of the prepared MoSi2 and MoSi2-based composites. Figure 3(a) indicates that the grain size of MoSi2 was very coarse and the fracture surface of pure MoSi2 was smooth, which suggested that the predominating fracture modes were transgranular for MoSi2. Figures 3(b), 3(c), 3(d), and 3(e) show that the fracture surface of MoSi2-based composites is rough and consists of a large amount of little irregular planes, which indicates that the predominating fracture modes were mixed transgranularly and intergranularly for MoSi2-based composites. The reason for this may be that the addition of Si3N4 and SiC particles dispersed in the grain boundaries of MoSi2 (see Figures 2(b), 2(c), 2(d), and 2(e)) has some influences on the intrinsic characters of MoSi2 and then weakens the grain boundary of MoSi2, subsequently leading to the increase of intergranular fracture modes. Thus, dispersion strengthening of reinforced agents is an important reason for the increasing of bending strength of MoSi2-based composites.SEM analysis of the three-point bending test fracture surface. (a) MoSi2; (b) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC; (c) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4; (d) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4; (e) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)The grain sizes of MoSi2 of the synthesized samples were analyzed by polarizing microscopy and the transversal method. The results are shown as Figure 4 and Table 2, which indicate that the grain size of MoSi2 decreases with the increase of Si3N4 and SiC content in the range of 0–40 vol.% and MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4 composite exhibits the smallest grain size (4.1 μm). Thus, the refinement of grain size of MoSi2 is another important factor for the MoSi2-based composites having higher bending strength than that of pure MoSi2.Figure 4
Polarizing microscopy analysis of the prepared samples. (a) MoSi2; (b) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC; (c) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4; (d) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4; (e) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4.The relationship between grain size of MoSi2 and bending strength may be described by using a certain equation, such as Hall-Petch equation [24]. The effect of grain size (d) of MoSi2 on the bending strength is shown as Figure 5.Figure 5
Relationship between bending strength and grain size of MoSi2.Figure5 indicates that the relationship between the grain sizes of MoSi2 and bending strength is not entirely fit with the Hall-Petch equation because the bending strength not only is affected by the refinement of grain size of MoSi2 but also is affected by the dispersion strengthening of reinforced agents.


#### 3.3.2. Toughening Mechanism

(1) Fine Crystal Toughening
The fracture toughening results mentioned above can be explained by the various toughening mechanisms. It is well known that the fracture toughness of brittle ceramic materials increases with the decrease of the grain size [25]. The reason for this may be that the grain refining will be a benefit to decrease stress concentration and crack formation for it will increase the binding force between closed grains, then the deformation of inner crystal grain is transferred to adjacent crystal grain. On the other hand, grain boundary can restrain crack propagation, and further more, the energy consumed by crack propagation increases with the decrease of grain size. Usually, (5) is used to judge whether the crack is destabilizing propagation or not [26]:
(5)(σ0d1/2+ky)ky′≥βμγ,
where σ0 is the frictional resistance of dislocation, d grain size, ky,ky′,β constant, μ shear modulus, and γ specific area. When the value of (σ0d1/2+ky)ky′ is higher than that of  βμγ, the crack is destabilizing propagation; therefore, decreasing grain size will be difficult for crack generating destabilizing propagation.(2) Crack Deflection, Branch and Microcrack Toughening
Microcracks and crack propagation in MoSi2 and MoSi2-20 vol%SiC-20 vol%Si3N4 composite are shown in Figure 6.
Figures6(a), 6(b), 6(c), and 6(d) show the microcracking, crack deflection, crack microbridging, and crack branching in the composite. Rice [27, 28] has reviewed the mechanisms that can toughen ceramic composite. These mechanisms include matrix microcracking, crack branching, crack deflection, crack bowing, and fiber pull out. Carter and Hurley [29] suggested crack deflection as an important toughening mechanism in SiC-whisker-reinforced MoSi2. Bhattacharya and Petrovic [17] provided evidence for crack-interface grain bridging (crack microbridging) in 20 vol.% SiC-MoSi2 composite and crack branching in 40 vol.% SiC-MoSi2 composite.  In the present study, grain pullout does not appear. Microcracking, crack deflection, crack microbridging, and crack branching were observed in the composite, which can be explained by the presence of a complex residual stress field [30] and the high resistance to crack propagation because the addition of SiC and Si3N4 particles in the matrix will absorb more energy and thus improve the fracture toughness value.Secondary electron SEM images of the crack propagating behavior in the MoSi2-SiC-Si3N4 composite. (a) Microcracking, (b) crack deflection, (c) crack microbridging, and (d) crack branching.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.1. Microstructure

Figure1 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of MoSi2, MoSi2-20 vol% SiC composite, and MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4 composite. As seen in Figure 1, the prepared composites mainly consist of the phases including MoSi2 and reinforcing agents such as Si3N4 and SiC, and a small amount of Mo5Si3. Among these phases, Mo5Si3 should be generated from the reaction (see (3)) between MoSi2 and oxygen under high hot-pressing temperature (1700°C) [22]. The peaks of SiO2 were not observed in Figure 1, which may be attributed to the low content of SiO2 in the prepared samples(3)5MoSi2+7O2=Mo5Si3+7SiO2.XRD pattern of the prepared composites. (a) MoSi2, (b) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC, (c) MoSi2-20 vol% Si3N4-20 vol% SiC.
(a)(b)(c)Figure2 shows the backscattered electron images of the MoSi2-20 vol% SiC, MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4, MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4, and MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4 compacts. Figure 2 reveals a dense microstructure of the composite, which is consistent with the density analysis results of these samples (Table 1). Figure 2(a) indicates that the microstructure of monolithic MoSi2 is composed of gray zone (MoSi2), white zone (Mo5Si3), and black zone (SiO2). It can be seen from Figures 2(b), 2(c), 2(d), and 2(e) that the microstructure of MoSi2-based composites consists of gray zone (MoSi2), white zone (Mo5Si3), and black zone (Si3N4 and SiC) dispersed in the grain boundary of MoSi2. These results indicate that no chemical reaction occurs among MoSi2, SiC, and Si3N4 under the hot-pressing conditions; this is a precondition for preparing MoSi2-based composites with excellent properties.Table 1
Mechanical properties and densities of the prepared samples.
SampleDensity/%Bending strength/MPaFracture toughness/MPa·m1/2Vickers hardness/GPaMoSi298.62163.18.1MoSi2-20 vol% SiC98.33358.29.3MoSi2-20 vol% SiC -10 vol% Si3N497.63889.410.5MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N496.342710.411.4MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N495.23968.911.8SEM analysis on the microstructure of the prepared samples (backscattering imaging). (a) MoSi2; (b) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC; (c) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4; (d) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4; (e) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


## 3.2. Mechanical Properties and Densities of the Prepared Samples

The bulk densities and mechanical properties of the hot-pressed samples were listed in Table1. The elastic modulus (E) of MoSi2-Si3N4/SiC composites was calculated as follows:(4)E=EmVm+EfVf+EwVw,
where Em is the elastic modulus of polycrystalline MoSi2 (440 MPa), Ef the elastic modulus of Si3N4 (300 MPa), Ew the elastic modulus of SiC (448 MPa),  Vm,Vf,Vw, the volume fractions of MoSi2, Si3N4, and SiC, respectively [23].It can be seen from Table1 that the relative densities of the hot-pressed samples are above 95% and decrease slowly with the increasing of reinforcing agent contents, which means that high-density MoSi2 could be obtained by the hot-pressing process. Table 1 also indicates that the bending strength, fracture toughness, and Vickers hardness of the MoSi2-based composites are better than that of monolithic MoSi2 and increase gradually with the increase of Si3N4 and SiC content in the range of 0–40 vol.%. Among these prepared samples, MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4 composite exhibits the highest bending strength (427 MPa) and fracture toughness (10.4 MPa·m1/2), which may be due to the fact that it has the smallest grain size of MoSi2 (4.1 μm, see Table 2) and relatively high density. The bending strength and fracture toughness of the MoSi2-20 vol%SiC-30 vol%Si3N4 composite are lower than that of the MoSi2-20 vol%SiC-20 vol%Si3N4 composite, which may be attributed to its relatively large grain size of MoSi2(4.7 μm, see Table 2) and high Si3N4 content leading to the decreasing of its density.Table 2
MoSi2 grain sizes of the prepared samples.
SampleMoSi2MoSi2-20 vol% SiCMoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4MoSi2 grain size/μm18.610.26.54.14.7


## 3.3. Investigation of Strengthening and Toughening Mechanism of MoSi2-Based Composites

### 3.3.1. Strengthening Mechanism

Figure3 shows the fracture morphologies of the prepared MoSi2 and MoSi2-based composites. Figure 3(a) indicates that the grain size of MoSi2 was very coarse and the fracture surface of pure MoSi2 was smooth, which suggested that the predominating fracture modes were transgranular for MoSi2. Figures 3(b), 3(c), 3(d), and 3(e) show that the fracture surface of MoSi2-based composites is rough and consists of a large amount of little irregular planes, which indicates that the predominating fracture modes were mixed transgranularly and intergranularly for MoSi2-based composites. The reason for this may be that the addition of Si3N4 and SiC particles dispersed in the grain boundaries of MoSi2 (see Figures 2(b), 2(c), 2(d), and 2(e)) has some influences on the intrinsic characters of MoSi2 and then weakens the grain boundary of MoSi2, subsequently leading to the increase of intergranular fracture modes. Thus, dispersion strengthening of reinforced agents is an important reason for the increasing of bending strength of MoSi2-based composites.SEM analysis of the three-point bending test fracture surface. (a) MoSi2; (b) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC; (c) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4; (d) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4; (e) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)The grain sizes of MoSi2 of the synthesized samples were analyzed by polarizing microscopy and the transversal method. The results are shown as Figure 4 and Table 2, which indicate that the grain size of MoSi2 decreases with the increase of Si3N4 and SiC content in the range of 0–40 vol.% and MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4 composite exhibits the smallest grain size (4.1 μm). Thus, the refinement of grain size of MoSi2 is another important factor for the MoSi2-based composites having higher bending strength than that of pure MoSi2.Figure 4
Polarizing microscopy analysis of the prepared samples. (a) MoSi2; (b) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC; (c) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4; (d) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4; (e) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4.The relationship between grain size of MoSi2 and bending strength may be described by using a certain equation, such as Hall-Petch equation [24]. The effect of grain size (d) of MoSi2 on the bending strength is shown as Figure 5.Figure 5
Relationship between bending strength and grain size of MoSi2.Figure5 indicates that the relationship between the grain sizes of MoSi2 and bending strength is not entirely fit with the Hall-Petch equation because the bending strength not only is affected by the refinement of grain size of MoSi2 but also is affected by the dispersion strengthening of reinforced agents.


### 3.3.2. Toughening Mechanism

(1) Fine Crystal Toughening
The fracture toughening results mentioned above can be explained by the various toughening mechanisms. It is well known that the fracture toughness of brittle ceramic materials increases with the decrease of the grain size [25]. The reason for this may be that the grain refining will be a benefit to decrease stress concentration and crack formation for it will increase the binding force between closed grains, then the deformation of inner crystal grain is transferred to adjacent crystal grain. On the other hand, grain boundary can restrain crack propagation, and further more, the energy consumed by crack propagation increases with the decrease of grain size. Usually, (5) is used to judge whether the crack is destabilizing propagation or not [26]:
(5)(σ0d1/2+ky)ky′≥βμγ,
where σ0 is the frictional resistance of dislocation, d grain size, ky,ky′,β constant, μ shear modulus, and γ specific area. When the value of (σ0d1/2+ky)ky′ is higher than that of  βμγ, the crack is destabilizing propagation; therefore, decreasing grain size will be difficult for crack generating destabilizing propagation.(2) Crack Deflection, Branch and Microcrack Toughening
Microcracks and crack propagation in MoSi2 and MoSi2-20 vol%SiC-20 vol%Si3N4 composite are shown in Figure 6.
Figures6(a), 6(b), 6(c), and 6(d) show the microcracking, crack deflection, crack microbridging, and crack branching in the composite. Rice [27, 28] has reviewed the mechanisms that can toughen ceramic composite. These mechanisms include matrix microcracking, crack branching, crack deflection, crack bowing, and fiber pull out. Carter and Hurley [29] suggested crack deflection as an important toughening mechanism in SiC-whisker-reinforced MoSi2. Bhattacharya and Petrovic [17] provided evidence for crack-interface grain bridging (crack microbridging) in 20 vol.% SiC-MoSi2 composite and crack branching in 40 vol.% SiC-MoSi2 composite.  In the present study, grain pullout does not appear. Microcracking, crack deflection, crack microbridging, and crack branching were observed in the composite, which can be explained by the presence of a complex residual stress field [30] and the high resistance to crack propagation because the addition of SiC and Si3N4 particles in the matrix will absorb more energy and thus improve the fracture toughness value.Secondary electron SEM images of the crack propagating behavior in the MoSi2-SiC-Si3N4 composite. (a) Microcracking, (b) crack deflection, (c) crack microbridging, and (d) crack branching.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.3.1. Strengthening Mechanism

Figure3 shows the fracture morphologies of the prepared MoSi2 and MoSi2-based composites. Figure 3(a) indicates that the grain size of MoSi2 was very coarse and the fracture surface of pure MoSi2 was smooth, which suggested that the predominating fracture modes were transgranular for MoSi2. Figures 3(b), 3(c), 3(d), and 3(e) show that the fracture surface of MoSi2-based composites is rough and consists of a large amount of little irregular planes, which indicates that the predominating fracture modes were mixed transgranularly and intergranularly for MoSi2-based composites. The reason for this may be that the addition of Si3N4 and SiC particles dispersed in the grain boundaries of MoSi2 (see Figures 2(b), 2(c), 2(d), and 2(e)) has some influences on the intrinsic characters of MoSi2 and then weakens the grain boundary of MoSi2, subsequently leading to the increase of intergranular fracture modes. Thus, dispersion strengthening of reinforced agents is an important reason for the increasing of bending strength of MoSi2-based composites.SEM analysis of the three-point bending test fracture surface. (a) MoSi2; (b) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC; (c) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4; (d) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4; (e) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)The grain sizes of MoSi2 of the synthesized samples were analyzed by polarizing microscopy and the transversal method. The results are shown as Figure 4 and Table 2, which indicate that the grain size of MoSi2 decreases with the increase of Si3N4 and SiC content in the range of 0–40 vol.% and MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4 composite exhibits the smallest grain size (4.1 μm). Thus, the refinement of grain size of MoSi2 is another important factor for the MoSi2-based composites having higher bending strength than that of pure MoSi2.Figure 4
Polarizing microscopy analysis of the prepared samples. (a) MoSi2; (b) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC; (c) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-10 vol% Si3N4; (d) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-20 vol% Si3N4; (e) MoSi2-20 vol% SiC-30 vol% Si3N4.The relationship between grain size of MoSi2 and bending strength may be described by using a certain equation, such as Hall-Petch equation [24]. The effect of grain size (d) of MoSi2 on the bending strength is shown as Figure 5.Figure 5
Relationship between bending strength and grain size of MoSi2.Figure5 indicates that the relationship between the grain sizes of MoSi2 and bending strength is not entirely fit with the Hall-Petch equation because the bending strength not only is affected by the refinement of grain size of MoSi2 but also is affected by the dispersion strengthening of reinforced agents.


## 3.3.2. Toughening Mechanism

(1) Fine Crystal Toughening
The fracture toughening results mentioned above can be explained by the various toughening mechanisms. It is well known that the fracture toughness of brittle ceramic materials increases with the decrease of the grain size [25]. The reason for this may be that the grain refining will be a benefit to decrease stress concentration and crack formation for it will increase the binding force between closed grains, then the deformation of inner crystal grain is transferred to adjacent crystal grain. On the other hand, grain boundary can restrain crack propagation, and further more, the energy consumed by crack propagation increases with the decrease of grain size. Usually, (5) is used to judge whether the crack is destabilizing propagation or not [26]:
(5)(σ0d1/2+ky)ky′≥βμγ,
where σ0 is the frictional resistance of dislocation, d grain size, ky,ky′,β constant, μ shear modulus, and γ specific area. When the value of (σ0d1/2+ky)ky′ is higher than that of  βμγ, the crack is destabilizing propagation; therefore, decreasing grain size will be difficult for crack generating destabilizing propagation.(2) Crack Deflection, Branch and Microcrack Toughening
Microcracks and crack propagation in MoSi2 and MoSi2-20 vol%SiC-20 vol%Si3N4 composite are shown in Figure 6.
Figures6(a), 6(b), 6(c), and 6(d) show the microcracking, crack deflection, crack microbridging, and crack branching in the composite. Rice [27, 28] has reviewed the mechanisms that can toughen ceramic composite. These mechanisms include matrix microcracking, crack branching, crack deflection, crack bowing, and fiber pull out. Carter and Hurley [29] suggested crack deflection as an important toughening mechanism in SiC-whisker-reinforced MoSi2. Bhattacharya and Petrovic [17] provided evidence for crack-interface grain bridging (crack microbridging) in 20 vol.% SiC-MoSi2 composite and crack branching in 40 vol.% SiC-MoSi2 composite.  In the present study, grain pullout does not appear. Microcracking, crack deflection, crack microbridging, and crack branching were observed in the composite, which can be explained by the presence of a complex residual stress field [30] and the high resistance to crack propagation because the addition of SiC and Si3N4 particles in the matrix will absorb more energy and thus improve the fracture toughness value.Secondary electron SEM images of the crack propagating behavior in the MoSi2-SiC-Si3N4 composite. (a) Microcracking, (b) crack deflection, (c) crack microbridging, and (d) crack branching.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 4. Conclusions

(1)
MoSi2-matrix composites doped by SiC and Si3N4 particles were successfully prepared by hot-pressing techniques. Notable effects on the bending strength and fracture toughness of MoSi2 caused by the addition of SiC and Si3N4 particles were found. When adding about 20 vol.%SiC and 20 vol.%Si3N4 particles, the strength and toughness value of the composite reaches the highest, which is about 100% and 340%, respectively, more than that of pure MoSi2.(2)
When the volume content of reinforced agents is below 40 vol%, the grain size of MoSi2 decreases with increase of the volume content of reinforced agents, and MoSi2-20 vol%SiC-20 vol%Si3N4 exhibited the minimum grain size of MoSi2. The relationship between the grain sizes of MoSi2 and bending strength is not entirely fit with the Hall-Petch equation.(3)
The strengthening mechanisms of MoSi2-SiC-Si3N4 composites include fine-grain strengthening and dispersion strengthening; the toughening mechanisms of it include fine-grain, microcracking, crack deflection, crack microbridging, and crack branching.



---

*Source: 180750-2012-01-29.xml*