# Method for Estimating Optimum Free Resonant Frequencies in Overcoupled WPT System

Authors: Dong-Wook Seo; Jae-Ho Lee
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

In our previous work, we proposed the method to maximize the output power even in the overcoupled state of the wireless power transfer (WPT) system by controlling free resonant frequencies and derived closed-form expression for optimum free resonant frequencies of the primary and secondary resonators. In this paper, we propose the mutual coupling approach to derive the optimum free resonant frequencies and show the measured power transfer efficiency (PTE) using the transmission efficiency as well as the system energy efficiency. The results of the proposed approach exactly coincide with those of the previous work, and the fabricated prototype achieves the transmission efficiency of about 80% by tuning the free resonant frequencies to the optimum values in the overcoupled state.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Recently, the wireless power transfer (WPT) system has drawn a great deal of attention as it was applied in various electric devices including implanted devices [1], mobile devices [2], and electric vehicles [3]. Furthermore, many researchers are now starting to combine the WPT system with a communications system, and the combined system is called the simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) [4]. In the future, power lines are expected to be replaced by the WPT system. However, inductive WPT systems have the following inefficiency; it achieves the maximum output power and power transfer efficiency (PTE) only at a specific frequency and at a specific distance (i.e., coupling coefficient). Figure 1 shows the transmission coefficient of the WPT system of [5] as a function of frequency and as a function of coupling coefficient. For the operating frequency of 10 MHz, the frequency with the maximum transmission coefficient bifurcates at the critical coupling resulting in the well-known frequency splitting phenomenon. The output power and the transmission coefficients are generally maximized at the critical coupling, and they decrease when the coupling coefficient deviates from the critical coupling, as shown in Figure 1(b). In the overcoupled state, the excessive coupling between the coils results in frequency splitting, producing low transmission coefficients. On the other hand, low amount of power is transferred from the primary resonator to the secondary resonator in the undercoupled state, due to the low coupling coefficient. It is difficult to operate and maintain the WPT system at the critical coupling. According to changed operating circumstances, that is to say, changed coupling coefficient, some system parameters should be adjusted to achieve the high transmission coefficient.Figure 1
Transmission coefficient of a WPT system (a) as a function of frequency and coupling coefficient and (b) as a function of coupling coefficient at the operating frequency of 10 MHz.
(a)
(b)Figure2 shows an equivalent circuit model of a two-coil WPT system, where the controllable elements include voltage source Vs, source impedance Rs, load impedance RL, primary coil L1, secondary coil L2, and capacitances of primary and secondary resonators, C1 and C2. Depending on the circuit elements, various methods have been introduced to improve the PTE and output power of the WPT system [6–13]. These methods are categorized in two types: a method that changes the critical coupling coefficient [6–10] and a method that mitigates the equivalent coupling coefficient in the overcoupled state [11–13]. The former methods control the resistance or inductance in order to change the critical coupling coefficient kc, since kc is a function of the resistance and inductance. The latter methods control the voltage source or capacitance to change the operating frequency or free resonant frequencies only in the overcoupled state.Figure 2
Equivalent circuit model of a two-coil resonant WPT system.For the control of resistance, the most commonly used method is the matching networks. This method converts source and load impedances into optimum values. Our group revealed that the WPT system using lumped reactive matching networks is equivalent to a two-coil WPT system, and the WPT system using transformer matching networks could be considered as a four-coil WPT system [6]. Additionally, we showed how the source (or load) impedance could be matched to the optimum value not only in the two-coil WPT system but also in the four-coil WPT system. In [7], a switchable capacitor array circuit was proposed, and it was shown that several capacitors were enough to implement a variety of matching cases in an L-section matching network. Our group showed that the WPT system can achieve the high PTE by adjusting only the source impedance [8], and we also demonstrated the self-adaptive WPT system achieving the high PTE without the feedback of receiver information [9].Besides the method using matching networks, the method of selecting the optimum primary and secondary coils among the coil arrays was suggested in [10].By adjusting either the amplitude or the operating frequency of voltage source, the output power can be improved. Changing the amplitude of the voltage source does not improve the PTE, while changing the operating frequency in overcoupled state achieves the high PTE [11, 12]. However, this method may result in the violation of frequency regulation for a WPT system in narrow bandwidth. Similarly, our group recently proposed that free resonant frequencies of resonators are tuned to optimum frequencies in order to achieve a high PTE in overcoupled state [13]. In [13], the optimum free resonant frequencies were derived in the closed-form based on a condition having a current ratio between the primary and secondary resonators identical to that in critical coupled state. In addition, the system energy efficiency was used to express the PTE instead of the more commonly used transmission efficiency. On the other hand, the free resonant frequency tuning method was applied not only to the two-coil WPT system but also to the multicoil WPT system [14]. The authors of [14] determined the capacitance and free resonant frequencies by using a genetic algorithm; however, the process does not guarantee a global maximum and takes dramatically increasing time as the number of resonators increases. Additionally, it is also cumbersome to apply the principles used in [13] to the multicoil WPT system.In [15], we have already presented the idea that the effect of mutual inductance on a reflected inductance can be used to derive the condition of the optimum free resonant frequencies for a high PTE. In this paper, we form the concept in greater detail and show that the tuned free resonant frequencies result in a high PTE using the transmission efficiency as well as the output power.


## 2. Formulation

In the circuit model of Figure2, M is the mutual inductance between the primary and secondary coils and is given by(1)M=kL1L2,0≤k≤1,where k is the coupling coefficient.When no mutual coupling exists, that is,M = k = 0, the resonance frequency is called the free resonant frequency. The free resonance frequencies of the primary and secondary resonators are given, respectively, (2)ω1=1L1C1,ω2=1L2C2.In the conventional WPT system, the free resonant frequencies are tuned to the operating frequency,ω0, allowing the WPT system to function at the operating frequency. However, as the definition of the free resonant frequency might suggest, the primary and secondary resonators work at the operating frequency only when there is little or no mutual coupling. If the mutual coupling becomes stronger, then the resonators affect each other, and the resonant frequencies of the resonators are no longer equal to the operating frequency. To see this effect intuitively, we use reflected impedance concept. The circuit model of Figure 2 can be described using the reflected impedance Zr as shown in Figure 3, and Zr is expressed as(3)Zr=ω2M2RL+R2p+jωL2+1/jωC2.Figure 3
Equivalent circuit model of a two-coil resonant WPT system using reflected impedance.The loadedQ of the primary and secondary series RLC resonators are defined as, respectively, (4)Q1=ωL1Rs+R1p,Q2=ωL2RL+R2p.Using (1), (2), and (4), Zr can be rewritten as(5)Zr=ωL1k21/Q2+j1-ω22/ω2,where the real and imaginary parts are given by(6)ReZr=ωL1·k2/Q21/Q22+1-ω22/ω22,(7)ImZr=ωL1·k2ω22/ω2-11/Q22+ω22/ω2-12.Therefore, due to the mutual coupling, the resistance of (6) and reactance of (7) are added to the primary resonator. Let the right-hand side of (7) be the product of ωL1 and a function of the free resonant frequency of the secondary resonator,A(ω2). Then, the total inductance of the primary resonator becomes L1+L1·A(ω2). In order to work at the operating frequency, the resonant frequency of the primary resonator should be(8)1L11+Aω2·C1=ω11+Aω2=ω0,which is satisfied by adjusting the capacitance of the primary resonator, C1.Similarly, in order to operate the secondary resonator at the operating frequencyω0, the resonant frequency of the secondary resonator should also be (9)1L21+Bω1·C2=ω21+Bω1=ω0,whereB(ω1) is given by(10)Bω1=k2ω12/ω2-11/Q12+ω12/ω2-12.Since variablesA(ω2) andB(ω1) are functions of ω2 and ω1, respectively, (8) and (9) must be solved simultaneously for the variables ω2 and ω1.


## 3. Estimation Procedure

It is cumbersome to directly solve the simultaneous equations (8) and (9). Instead, we can find the optimal free resonant frequencies using an iterative process, as summarized in Figure 4. The detailed steps of the proposed scheme are described as follows.(1)
Set the operating frequencyω0 and system parameters Rs, R1p, L1, RL, R2p, L2, and k of Figure 2. Vs, C1, and C2 are not required.(2)
It is recommended that the initialω1 and ω2 are set to be two times the operating frequency. If the initial ω1 and ω2 are set to be ω0,A(ω2) andB(ω1) terms become zero, which removes the mutual coupling in the reactance of the reflected impedance.(3)
CalculateA(ω2) using (7) and update ω1 using (8).(4)
CalculateB(ω1) using (10) and update ω2 using (9).(5)
Compute the variation ofω1 and ω2. If Δω1/ω1  and  Δω2/ω2≤0.1%, then go to step (6). Otherwise, go to step (3).(6)
Obtain the finalω1 and ω2.(7)
EstimateC1 and C2 by using (2) according to the final ω1 and ω2.Figure 4
Flowchart of the proposed iterative process.


## 4. Simulation and Experiment Results

We simulated and measured the WPT system with the identical parameter used in [13]. Figure 5 shows schematics and component values of the experimental setup to validate the proposed method. The capacitance values of the primary and secondary resonators are varied to adjust the free resonant frequencies to the estimated optimum values in the overcoupled state. The switching frequency of the series-resonant half-bridge inverter is 108 kHz, and IR25603 and IRFP250N are used as the inverter driver and the switching device, respectively. The coils that were used were obtained from ABRACON Corp. Because of high voltage, the film capacitors and cement resistors were used as the capacitor of the resonators, the source, and load resistors.Figure 5
Schematic of the WPT system prototype.Figure6 shows the estimated free resonant frequencies with respect to the iteration number. We show two cases of the overcoupled state, k = 0.129 and 0.190. In this system, Q1 and Q2 are 21.1 and 4.2, respectively, since Q1≠Q2, ω1≠ω2. Additionally, the higher the loaded Q of the other resonator is, the more the free resonant frequency deviates from ω0. The optimum free resonant frequencies are reached only after several iterations.Figure 6
Free resonant frequencies with respect to iteration number fork = 0.129 and 0.190.We summarized the results of [13] and the proposed iterative process in Table 1. The estimated optimum free resonant frequencies using the proposed method are very similar to those of [13]. We highlight the fact that there is only a maximum difference of 0.04 kHz between the results of two methods.Table 1
The estimated free resonant frequencies using method of [13] and the proposed method with respect to coupling coefficients to achieve the high PTE.
Coupling coefficient
ω
1  &  ω2 of [13] [kHz]
ω
1  &  ω2 using the proposed method [kHz]
Difference [kHz]
Terminated iteration number
0.214
112.38
112.39
0.01
5
128.54
128.51
0.03
0.190
111.73
111.73
0
4
125.63
125.63
0
0.164
110.97
110.97
0
4
122.19
122.19
0
0.143
110.28
110.28
0
5
119.02
119.02
0
0.129
109.75
109.74
0.01
6
116.51
116.51
0
0.116
109.11
109.10
0.01
10
113.48
113.44
0.04Figure7 shows the estimated optimum free resonant frequencies of the primary and secondary resonators as a function of the coupling coefficient, and the iteration number when the proposed process is terminated. As expected, the larger the coupling coefficient is, the farther away the optimum free resonant frequencies deviate from the operating frequency (108 kHz). The interesting point is that the smaller the coupling coefficient is, the more the iterations were needed. We hypothesize that it is because the initial values of ω1 and ω2 are set to be two times ω0. Nevertheless, convergence is reached within ten iterations.Figure 7
Estimated results using the proposed method as a function of coupling coefficient: (a) free resonant frequencies and (b) terminated iteration number.
(a)
(b)The efficiency (or power gain) of an electrical system is defined as the ratio of an output power to an input power. The output power is referred to as a load power, while the input power is defined as either the total input power from the power source,Vs·I1∗, or maximum available power at the power source, Vs2/4Rs. Efficiency is defined differently depending on the definition of the input power. According to [16], the efficiency with the former notation is called “system energy efficiency” which is given by η=(VL2/RL)/(Vs·I1∗), and the efficiency with the latter notation is called “transmission efficiency” which is given by η=(VL2/RL)/(Vs2/4Rs). The difference between them is determined by whether the power loss by the source resistance is included in the input power or not. In general, the system energy efficiency is used in the WPT with negligible source resistance and low operation frequency, while the transmission efficiency is used in the WPT operating at a high frequency and with fixed source resistance. In this study, we use the transmission efficiency to represent the performance of the WPT system, because Vs and Rs of the generator were fixed as 4.5 Vrms and 0.7 Ω, respectively.Figure8 depicts the measured load power and transmission efficiency when the values are optimized for the tuned free resonant frequencies obtained from the proposed process. Since the input power in the transmission efficiency is defined as the maximally delivered power from the power source, the input power keeps unchanged regardless of status of the WPT system and load. Then, the transmission efficiency has a direct relation to the load power. From Figure 8, we notice that the transmission efficiency is maximized by maximizing the load power. When the tuned free resonant frequencies are applied to the overcoupled WPT system, the system energy efficiency approaches about 50% in [13] while the transmission efficiency approaches about 81%. Obviously, the tuned free resonant frequencies effectively improve the transmission efficiency and load power in the overcoupled state.Figure 8
Calculated and measured load power and transmission efficiency.


## 5. Conclusion

In this paper, we proposed a new approach to derive the optimum free resonant frequencies in the overcoupled WPT system. The optimum values can be obtained through several iterations and are identical to those obtained in previous works. Additionally, when the tuned free resonant frequencies are adopted in the overcoupled WPT system, the system achieves the transmission efficiency close to 80% and the system energy efficiency close to 50%.The proposed method is very intuitive and simple. Therefore, it can be extended to the sophisticated applications such as a multicoil WPT system.



---

*Source: 1830687-2017-04-27.xml*