# Chemical Constituents and an Antineuroinflammatory Lignan, Savinin from the Roots ofAcanthopanax henryi

Authors: Xiao-Jun Li; Kwan-Woo Kim; Hyuncheol Oh; Xiang-Qian Liu; Youn-Chul Kim
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

The phytochemical investigation on the roots ofAcanthopanax henryi (Araliaceae) resulted in the discovery of twenty compounds whose chemical structures were elucidated by the analysis of 1D-, 2D-NMR, mass spectrometry data, other physicochemical properties, and a comparison of the spectral data with the literature. They were identified as (-)-sesamin (1), helioxanthin (2), savinin (3), taiwanin C (4), 6-methoxy-7-hydroxycoumarin (5), behenic acid (6), 3-O-caffeoyl-quinic acid (7), 5-O-caffeoyl-quinic acid (8), 1,3-di-O-caffeoyl-quinic acid (9), 1,4-di-O-caffeoyl-quinic acid (10), 1,5-di-O-caffeoyl-quinic acid (11), (+)-threo-(7R,8R)-guaiacylglycerol-β-coniferyl aldehyde ether (12), (+)-erythro-(7S,8R)-guaiacylglycerol-β-coniferyl aldehyde ether (13), ferulic acid (14), caffeic acid (15), stigmasterol (16), β-sitosterol (17), adenosine (18), syringin (19), andtrans-coniferin (20). Among these isolates, compound3 showed inhibitory activity against lipopolysaccharide- (LPS-) induced nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production with IC50 values of 2.22 ± 0.11 and 2.28 ± 0.23 μM, respectively. The effects of compound3 were associated with the suppression of LPS-induced expression of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) protein. Furthermore, compound3 negatively regulated the production of interleukin- (IL-) 1β and tumor-necrosis factor- (TNF-) α at the transcriptional level in LPS-stimulated BV2 microglial cells. These antineuroinflammatory effects of compound3 were mediated by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK).


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Neuroinflammatory responses are mainly mediated by microglial activation, and they are implicated in the development of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s diseases (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [1]. Microglial cells are the primary resident immune cells in the central nervous system (CNS) and are associated with defensive mechanisms to maintain homeostasis against brain injury [2]. In steady state, microglia exert protective responses by regulating innate and adaptive immune responses. However, activated microglia produce excess immune reactions which are detrimental to brain tissue and can produce various proinflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) α, interleukins (ILs), nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Released and accumulated, these proinflammatory mediators facilitate the development of neurodegenerative diseases [3, 4]. Therefore, it is important to suppress the secretion of proinflammatory mediators from activated microglial cells to prevent the neuroinflammation-related development of neurodegenerative diseases.Acanthopanaxspp. is one of the well-known medicinal resources in traditional oriental medicine in China, Korea, Japan, and far-east Russia. Its dried roots and stem barks are famous traditional folk medicine for treating rheumatism, arthritis, paralysis, sinew, and bone pain [5].Acanthopanax henryi(Oliv.) Harms, a Chinese endemic plant, has been used as a traditional remedy for the treatment of paralysis, arthritis, rheumatism, lameness, edema, injury from falls, hernia, and abdominal pain [6, 7]. Previous phytochemical studies onA. henryi led to the isolation and identification of more than 30 secondary metabolites, including five flavonoids, six caffeoylquinic acid derivatives [6], sixteen triterpenoid saponins [8, 9], one amide, one anthraquinone, one organic acid [9], three lignans, one diterpene, one phenylpropanoid, and two phytosterols [10]. In addition, it has been reported that this plant exhibits diverse pharmacological activities due to the wide variety of chemical constituents. For example, metabolites of the leaves ofA. henryi have strong antioxidant and antiacetyl cholinesterase activities [6], and the 80% methanol fraction of root bark and ciwujianoside C3, which was isolated from leaves of this plant, have significant anti-inflammatory effect in lipopolysaccharide- (LPS-) induced RAW264.7 macrophage cells [5, 11]. Moreover, some glycosides from the leaves ofA. henryi have antiadipogenic effect, decreasing lipid accumulation through the inhibition of proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPα) in 3T3-L1 cells [12]. However, it has not been investigated yet whether this plant has antineuroinflammatory effects.Therefore, in this study, we purified twenty compounds from the roots ofA. henryi and evaluated their antineuroinflammatory activityin vitro to continue our approach to contribute to the drug development for inflammation-mediated neurodegenerative diseases.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. General Experimental Procedures

NMR spectra (1D and 2D) were recorded using a JEOL JNM ECP-400 spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan) (400 MHz for1H and 100 MHz for 13C). HMQC and HMBC experiments were optimized for J
1
C
H = 140 Hz and J
n
C
H = 8 Hz, respectively. Optical rotations were recorded using a Jasco p-2000 digital polarimeter (Tokyo, Japan). HPLC (YOUNGLIN-YL9100, Younglin, Anyang, Korea) separation was performed on YMC-Pack ODS-A column (20 × 150 mm, 5 μm, and 12 nm) with a flow rate of 5 mL/min and the solvents used for HPLC were analytical grade. ESI-MS data were obtained using a Q-TOF micro-LC-MS/MS instrument (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at Korea University, Seoul, Korea. TLC was performed on Kieselgel 60 F254 (1.05715; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) or RP-18 F
254
s (Merck) plates. Spots were visualized by spraying with 10% aqueous H2SO4 solution followed by heating. Column chromatography (CC) was performed on silica gel (Kieselgel 60, 70-230 mesh and 230-400 mesh, Merck) and YMC octadecyl-functionalized silica gel (C18). These procedures were based on our previous report [13].


### 2.2. Plant Materials

The roots ofA. henryiwere collected from its natural habitat in Xinhua, Hunan Province, China, in October 2015 and identified by Professor Xiang Qian Liu, one of the coauthors of this study. A voucher specimen has been deposited in Herbarium of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Hunan, China (No. 20151025)


### 2.3. Extraction and Isolation

The air dried, powdered roots ofA. henryi (10 kg) were extracted with methanol under reflux (3 × 30 L). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to give a residue (303 g), which was suspended in distilled water and successively partitioned with petroleum ether (PE, b.p. 60-90°C), ethyl acetate (EtOAc), and n-butanol (BuOH), respectively.The EtOAc extract (41 g) was subjected to CC (7.0 × 60 cm) on silica gel, eluted with a gradient of dichloromethane (CH2Cl2)-methanol (MeOH) (100:1 to 10:1, v/v) to give ten fractions (Fr. E1-Fr. E10). Fr. E3 (2.630 g) was purified on silica gel CC (2.2 × 70 cm), eluted with hexane-EtOAc (30:1 to 1:1, v/v) to afford1 (61.0 mg),2 (28.0 mg),3 (23.0 mg),4 (7.0 mg), and5 (5.5 mg). Fr. E5 (444 mg) was firstly subjected to a C18 CC (1.2 × 60 cm), with a gradient MeOH-H2O (3:7 to 4:6, v/v) as the solvent and then purified by C18-Prep-HPLC (CH3CN-H2O = 1:4, v/v) to achieve12 (1.1 mg, t
R 25.8 min) and13 (1.1 mg, t
R 27.5 min). Fr. E7 (668 mg) was firstly subjected to a C18 CC (1.8 × 40 cm) elution with MeOH-H2O (2:8 to 3:7, v/v) and then further purified by silica gel CC (1.2 × 60 cm) using chloroform (CHCl3)-MeOH (20:1 to 10:1, v/v) to obtain colorless needles14 (9.0 mg). Fr. E10 (10 g) was subjected to C18 CC (4.0 × 50 cm) elution with MeOH-H2O (2:8 to 8:2, v/v) to give eight subfractions (Fr. E10.1-Fr. E10.8). Yellow amorphous powder7 (82.0 mg) was isolated from Fr. E10.1 (3.207 g) by C18 CC (2.2 × 70 cm, MeOH-H2O = 1:9, v/v) and decolorization with MeOH. Similarly, yellow amorphous powder10 (48.0 mg) was obtained from Fr. E10.3 (1.0 g) by C18 CC (1.8 × 80 cm, MeOH-H2O = 2:8, v/v) and decolorized with methanol. Compound9(60.0 mg) was achieved from Fr. E10.5 (1.5 g) by decolorization with methanol.The PE extract (80 g) was subjected to CC (6.5 × 40 cm) on a silica gel, eluted with a gradient of hexane-EtOAc (10:0 to 1:3, v/v) to give thirteen fractions (Fr. P1-Fr. P13). Fr. P4 (9.920 g) was subjected to a silica gel CC (4.0 × 50 cm) with a hexane-EtOAc gradient (250:1 to 40:1, v/v) as the solvent to gain6(200.0 mg). Fr. P8 (3.190 g) was firstly performed on a silica gel CC (2.2 × 70 cm) and then purified by recrystallization with hexane-EtOAc (7:1) to afford16 (50.0 mg) and17 (100.0 mg).The n-BuOH extract (100 g) was subjected to a C18 CC (7.0 × 60 cm) elution with a gradient of MeOH-H2O (5:95 to 60:40, v/v) to give nine fractions (Fr. B1-Fr. B9).15(67.0 mg) was achieved from Fr. B2 by decolorization with MeOH. Fr. B5 (7 g) was firstly fractionated by a C18 CC (4.0 × 50 cm) elution with MeOH-H2O (12:88 to 40:60, v/v) to afford seven subfractions (Fr. B5.1-B5.7), of which Fr. B5.3 (3 g) was then subjected to silica gel CC (2.2 × 70 cm) to yield8(71 mg) and19(26 mg). Fr. B4 (1.5 g) was subjected to silica gel CC (1.8 × 80 cm), eluted with CHCl3-MeOH (10:1 to 5:1, v/v) and then purified by successive recrystallizations with MeOH to give20 (12 mg). Fr. B3 (2.5 g) was subjected to a silica gel column (2.2 × 70 cm), eluted with a gradient of CHCl3-MeOH (10:1 to 8:1, v/v) to obtain six subfractions (Fr. B3.1-B3.6). Colorless crystal18 (18 mg) was yielded from Fr. B3.3 (278 mg) by recrystallization with MeOH. Compound11(4.0 mg) was obtained from Fr. B3.5 (300 mg) by repeated silica gel CC (1.2 × 60 cm) using CHCl3-MeOH-H2O (3:1:0.1 to 2:1:0.1, v/v/v) as a mobile phase and decolorization with MeOH.


### 2.4. Chemicals and Reagents

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), and other tissue culture reagents were purchased from Gibco BRL Co. (Grand Island, NY, USA). Lipopolysaccharide was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Primary antibodies such as anti-inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and anti-cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). Anti-p-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), anti-ERK, anti-p-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), anti-JNK, anti-p-p38, and anti-p38 were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Anti-mouse, anti-goat, and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were supplied by Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany). The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit for PGE2 was purchased from R&D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA).


### 2.5. Cell Culture

BV2 microglial cells were received from Professor Hyun Park at Wonkwang University (Iksan, Korea). BV2 cells were maintained at 5 × 106 cells in a 100 mm dish with DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated FBS, penicillin G (100 units/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL), andl-glutamine (2 mM) and incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.


### 2.6. Determination of Nitrite (NO Production)

BV2 cells were cultured in 24-well culture plates at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well. BV2 cells were pretreated with the isolated compounds fromA. henryi and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. After incubation, 100 μL of each supernatant was collected and mixed with the same volume of the Griess reagent. The absorbance at 540 nm wavelength was measured using a microplate reader. The detailed procedures are described in our previous report [14].


### 2.7. PGE2 Assay

The level of PGE2 present in each sample was determined using a commercially available kit from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Three independent assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, BV2 cells were seeded in 24-well culture plates at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well. Prior to the stimulation with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h, cells were treated with test compounds. After incubation, supernatant was collected and applied to the PGE2 ELISA kit for measuring the concentration of PGE2.


### 2.8. Western Blotting Analysis

The proteins iNOS, COX-2, and MAPK-associated proteins, including p-p38, p38, p-JNK, JNK, p-ERK, and ERK, were detected by a Western blot analysis. The procedures of this experiment were based on our previous report [14]. Cells were lysed by RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and normalized for equal amounts of protein using the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). 30 μg of protein was loaded for each sample and separated on 7.5 or 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels. Then, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose (NC) membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories). After that, membranes were incubated with Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T) with 5% skim milk (BD Difco, USA) for 1 h at 4°C. Then, membranes were probed with primary antibodies and incubated at 4°C for 90 min or overnight. After incubation, the membranes were washed with TBS-T, and then secondary antibodies were used for detecting primary antibodies. The protein bands on the NC membranes were covered by chemiluminescence with Amersham ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK).


### 2.9. Assays for IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α

The culture media were collected to determine the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α present in each sample using appropriate ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Inc.), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, BV2 cells were seeded in 24-well culture plates at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well. After incubation, the supernatant was collected and applied to the cytokine ELISA kits for measuring the concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α.


### 2.10. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

The detailed procedures of qRT-PCR and the primer sequences, which were used in this investigation were reported in our previous investigations [14, 15]. The analysis was conducted three times independently.


### 2.11. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test, was used to compare three or more groups. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software, version 3.03 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).


## 2.1. General Experimental Procedures

NMR spectra (1D and 2D) were recorded using a JEOL JNM ECP-400 spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan) (400 MHz for1H and 100 MHz for 13C). HMQC and HMBC experiments were optimized for J
1
C
H = 140 Hz and J
n
C
H = 8 Hz, respectively. Optical rotations were recorded using a Jasco p-2000 digital polarimeter (Tokyo, Japan). HPLC (YOUNGLIN-YL9100, Younglin, Anyang, Korea) separation was performed on YMC-Pack ODS-A column (20 × 150 mm, 5 μm, and 12 nm) with a flow rate of 5 mL/min and the solvents used for HPLC were analytical grade. ESI-MS data were obtained using a Q-TOF micro-LC-MS/MS instrument (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at Korea University, Seoul, Korea. TLC was performed on Kieselgel 60 F254 (1.05715; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) or RP-18 F
254
s (Merck) plates. Spots were visualized by spraying with 10% aqueous H2SO4 solution followed by heating. Column chromatography (CC) was performed on silica gel (Kieselgel 60, 70-230 mesh and 230-400 mesh, Merck) and YMC octadecyl-functionalized silica gel (C18). These procedures were based on our previous report [13].


## 2.2. Plant Materials

The roots ofA. henryiwere collected from its natural habitat in Xinhua, Hunan Province, China, in October 2015 and identified by Professor Xiang Qian Liu, one of the coauthors of this study. A voucher specimen has been deposited in Herbarium of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Hunan, China (No. 20151025)


## 2.3. Extraction and Isolation

The air dried, powdered roots ofA. henryi (10 kg) were extracted with methanol under reflux (3 × 30 L). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to give a residue (303 g), which was suspended in distilled water and successively partitioned with petroleum ether (PE, b.p. 60-90°C), ethyl acetate (EtOAc), and n-butanol (BuOH), respectively.The EtOAc extract (41 g) was subjected to CC (7.0 × 60 cm) on silica gel, eluted with a gradient of dichloromethane (CH2Cl2)-methanol (MeOH) (100:1 to 10:1, v/v) to give ten fractions (Fr. E1-Fr. E10). Fr. E3 (2.630 g) was purified on silica gel CC (2.2 × 70 cm), eluted with hexane-EtOAc (30:1 to 1:1, v/v) to afford1 (61.0 mg),2 (28.0 mg),3 (23.0 mg),4 (7.0 mg), and5 (5.5 mg). Fr. E5 (444 mg) was firstly subjected to a C18 CC (1.2 × 60 cm), with a gradient MeOH-H2O (3:7 to 4:6, v/v) as the solvent and then purified by C18-Prep-HPLC (CH3CN-H2O = 1:4, v/v) to achieve12 (1.1 mg, t
R 25.8 min) and13 (1.1 mg, t
R 27.5 min). Fr. E7 (668 mg) was firstly subjected to a C18 CC (1.8 × 40 cm) elution with MeOH-H2O (2:8 to 3:7, v/v) and then further purified by silica gel CC (1.2 × 60 cm) using chloroform (CHCl3)-MeOH (20:1 to 10:1, v/v) to obtain colorless needles14 (9.0 mg). Fr. E10 (10 g) was subjected to C18 CC (4.0 × 50 cm) elution with MeOH-H2O (2:8 to 8:2, v/v) to give eight subfractions (Fr. E10.1-Fr. E10.8). Yellow amorphous powder7 (82.0 mg) was isolated from Fr. E10.1 (3.207 g) by C18 CC (2.2 × 70 cm, MeOH-H2O = 1:9, v/v) and decolorization with MeOH. Similarly, yellow amorphous powder10 (48.0 mg) was obtained from Fr. E10.3 (1.0 g) by C18 CC (1.8 × 80 cm, MeOH-H2O = 2:8, v/v) and decolorized with methanol. Compound9(60.0 mg) was achieved from Fr. E10.5 (1.5 g) by decolorization with methanol.The PE extract (80 g) was subjected to CC (6.5 × 40 cm) on a silica gel, eluted with a gradient of hexane-EtOAc (10:0 to 1:3, v/v) to give thirteen fractions (Fr. P1-Fr. P13). Fr. P4 (9.920 g) was subjected to a silica gel CC (4.0 × 50 cm) with a hexane-EtOAc gradient (250:1 to 40:1, v/v) as the solvent to gain6(200.0 mg). Fr. P8 (3.190 g) was firstly performed on a silica gel CC (2.2 × 70 cm) and then purified by recrystallization with hexane-EtOAc (7:1) to afford16 (50.0 mg) and17 (100.0 mg).The n-BuOH extract (100 g) was subjected to a C18 CC (7.0 × 60 cm) elution with a gradient of MeOH-H2O (5:95 to 60:40, v/v) to give nine fractions (Fr. B1-Fr. B9).15(67.0 mg) was achieved from Fr. B2 by decolorization with MeOH. Fr. B5 (7 g) was firstly fractionated by a C18 CC (4.0 × 50 cm) elution with MeOH-H2O (12:88 to 40:60, v/v) to afford seven subfractions (Fr. B5.1-B5.7), of which Fr. B5.3 (3 g) was then subjected to silica gel CC (2.2 × 70 cm) to yield8(71 mg) and19(26 mg). Fr. B4 (1.5 g) was subjected to silica gel CC (1.8 × 80 cm), eluted with CHCl3-MeOH (10:1 to 5:1, v/v) and then purified by successive recrystallizations with MeOH to give20 (12 mg). Fr. B3 (2.5 g) was subjected to a silica gel column (2.2 × 70 cm), eluted with a gradient of CHCl3-MeOH (10:1 to 8:1, v/v) to obtain six subfractions (Fr. B3.1-B3.6). Colorless crystal18 (18 mg) was yielded from Fr. B3.3 (278 mg) by recrystallization with MeOH. Compound11(4.0 mg) was obtained from Fr. B3.5 (300 mg) by repeated silica gel CC (1.2 × 60 cm) using CHCl3-MeOH-H2O (3:1:0.1 to 2:1:0.1, v/v/v) as a mobile phase and decolorization with MeOH.


## 2.4. Chemicals and Reagents

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), and other tissue culture reagents were purchased from Gibco BRL Co. (Grand Island, NY, USA). Lipopolysaccharide was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Primary antibodies such as anti-inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and anti-cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). Anti-p-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), anti-ERK, anti-p-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), anti-JNK, anti-p-p38, and anti-p38 were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Anti-mouse, anti-goat, and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were supplied by Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany). The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit for PGE2 was purchased from R&D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA).


## 2.5. Cell Culture

BV2 microglial cells were received from Professor Hyun Park at Wonkwang University (Iksan, Korea). BV2 cells were maintained at 5 × 106 cells in a 100 mm dish with DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated FBS, penicillin G (100 units/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL), andl-glutamine (2 mM) and incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.


## 2.6. Determination of Nitrite (NO Production)

BV2 cells were cultured in 24-well culture plates at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well. BV2 cells were pretreated with the isolated compounds fromA. henryi and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. After incubation, 100 μL of each supernatant was collected and mixed with the same volume of the Griess reagent. The absorbance at 540 nm wavelength was measured using a microplate reader. The detailed procedures are described in our previous report [14].


## 2.7. PGE2 Assay

The level of PGE2 present in each sample was determined using a commercially available kit from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Three independent assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, BV2 cells were seeded in 24-well culture plates at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well. Prior to the stimulation with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h, cells were treated with test compounds. After incubation, supernatant was collected and applied to the PGE2 ELISA kit for measuring the concentration of PGE2.


## 2.8. Western Blotting Analysis

The proteins iNOS, COX-2, and MAPK-associated proteins, including p-p38, p38, p-JNK, JNK, p-ERK, and ERK, were detected by a Western blot analysis. The procedures of this experiment were based on our previous report [14]. Cells were lysed by RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and normalized for equal amounts of protein using the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). 30 μg of protein was loaded for each sample and separated on 7.5 or 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels. Then, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose (NC) membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories). After that, membranes were incubated with Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T) with 5% skim milk (BD Difco, USA) for 1 h at 4°C. Then, membranes were probed with primary antibodies and incubated at 4°C for 90 min or overnight. After incubation, the membranes were washed with TBS-T, and then secondary antibodies were used for detecting primary antibodies. The protein bands on the NC membranes were covered by chemiluminescence with Amersham ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK).


## 2.9. Assays for IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α

The culture media were collected to determine the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α present in each sample using appropriate ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Inc.), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, BV2 cells were seeded in 24-well culture plates at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well. After incubation, the supernatant was collected and applied to the cytokine ELISA kits for measuring the concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α.


## 2.10. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

The detailed procedures of qRT-PCR and the primer sequences, which were used in this investigation were reported in our previous investigations [14, 15]. The analysis was conducted three times independently.


## 2.11. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test, was used to compare three or more groups. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software, version 3.03 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Structure Determination

#### 3.1.1. (-)-Sesamin (1)

Colorless needles (MeOH),α
D
20 -46.7 (c 6.10, CHCl3), ESI-MS (m/z) 377 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 3.05 (2H, m, H-8, H-8′), 3.86 (2H, dd,J = 9.2, 3.6 Hz, H-9a, H-9′a), 4.23 (2H, dd,J = 9.2, 6.8 Hz, H-9e, H-9′e), 4.71 (2H, d,J = 4.4 Hz, H-7, H-7′), 5.94 (4H, s, 2OCH2O), 6.76-6.81 (4H, m, H-5, H-6, H-5′, H-6′), 6.84 (2H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2, H-2′); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ:148.1 (C-3, C-3′), 147.2 (C-4, C-4′), 135.2 (C-l, C-1′), 119.4 (C-6, C-6′), 108.3 (C-5, C-5′), 106.6 (C-2, C-2′), 101.2 (2OCH2O), 85.9 (C-7, C-7′), 71.8 (C-9, C-9′), 54.4 (C-8, C-8′). Based on a comparison of these 1H- and 13C-NMR data with data previously reported [16], compound1 was identified as (-)-sesamin.


#### 3.1.2. Helioxanthin (2)

Light yellow powder, ESI-MS (m/z) 371 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 8.55 (1H, s, H-7), 7.94 (1H, d,J = 8.8 Hz, H-6), 6.90 (1H, dd,J = 1.6, 8.0 Hz, H-6′), 7.51 (1H, d,J = 8.8 Hz, H-5), 7.01 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2′), 6.96 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.01, 5.99 (each 1H, d,J = 1.2 Hz, H-10), 6.12, 6.07 (each 1H, d,J = 0.8 Hz, H-10′), 5.28 (2H, s, H-9′); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 171.0 (C-9, C=O), 147.4 (C-4′), 147.3 (C-3′), 147.1 (C-3), 141.7 (C-4), 140.6 (C-8), 130.9 (C-1), 130.6 (C-1′), 128.9 (C-7′), 127.5 (C-7), 126.3 (C-6), 123.3 (C-6′), 121.3 (C-2), 121.2 (C-8′), 112.3 (C-5), 110.4 (C-2′), 108.3 (C-5′), 101.9 (C-10, -OCH2O-), 101.7 (C-10′, -OCH2O-), 69.9 (C-9′, lactone, -CH2-). The data of 1H- and 13C-NMR were consistent with those in previous report [16]. Compound2 was identified as helioxanthin.


#### 3.1.3. Savinin (3)

Light yellow powder,α
D
16 -35.5 (c 0.20, CHCl3), ESI-MS (m/z) 375 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.50 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-7), 7.08 (1H, dd,J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, H-6), 7.03 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2), 6.88 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5), 6.73 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.66 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2′), 6.64 (1H, dd,J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, H-6′), 6.03 (2H, s, -OCH2O-, H-10), 5.93 (2H, m, -OCH2O-, H-10′), 4.25 (2H, m, H-9′), 3.75 (1H, m, H-8′), 3.00 (1H, dd,J = 14.4, 4.4 Hz, H-7′e), 2.61 (1H, dd,J = 14.4, 10.0 Hz, H-7′a); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 172.6 (C-9, C=O), 149.3 (C-4), 148.4 (C-3), 148.0 (C-3′), 146.6 (C-4′), 137.4 (C-7), 131.6 (C-1′), 128.3 (C-1), 126.2 (C-6), 125.9 (C-8), 122.2 (C-6′), 109.2 (C-2′), 108.9 (C-5′), 108.8 (C-2), 108.6 (C-5), 101.8 (C-10, -OCH2O-), 101.1 (C-10′, -OCH2O-), 69.6 (C-9′, lactone, -CH2-), 40.0 (C-8′), 37.6 (C-7′). Based on a comparison of these NMR and ESI-MS data with the data reported previously [16], compound3 was identified as savinin.


#### 3.1.4. Taiwanin C (4)

Light yellow powder, ESI-MS (m/z) 371 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.95 (1H, s, H-7′), 7.53 (1H, s, H-2′), 7.05 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5), 6.90 (1H, s, H-5′), 6.88 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2), 6.76 (1H, dd,J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, H-6), 6.19 (2H, d,J = 2.0 Hz, H-10′), 6.15, 6.11 (each 1H, d,J = 0.8 Hz, H-10), 5.43 (2H, brs, H-9′); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 169.8 (C-9, C=O), 150.2 (C-4′), 149.0 (C-3′), 147.6 (C-3), 147.6 (C-4), 140.9 (C-7), 139.3 (C-8′), 134.9 (C-6′), 130.0 (C-1′), 128.9 (C-1), 123.9 (C-6), 119.0 (C-8), 120.2 (C-7′), 111.0 (C-2), 108.6 (C-5), 104.3 (C-2′), 102.7 (C-5′), 102.7 (C-10′, -OCH2O-), 101.7 (C-10, -OCH2O-), 68.5 (C-9′, lactone, -CH2-). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [17]. Compound4 was identified as taiwanin C.


#### 3.1.5. 6-Methoxy-7-Hydroxycoumarin (5)

Colorless needles (MeOH), UV 254 nm and 365 nm were blue-fluorescence, ESI-MS (m/z) 215 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 7.85 (1H, d,J = 9.6 Hz, H-4), 7.09 (1H, s, H-5), 6.76 (1H, s, H-8), 6.20 (1H, d,J = 9.6 Hz, H-3), 3.90 (3H, s, -OCH3); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 162.7 (C-2), 151.7 (C-7), 150.1 (C-9), 145.8 (C-6), 144.8 (C-4), 111.3 (C-3), 111.2 (C-10), 108.7 (C-5), 102.7 (C-8), 55.5 (-OCH3). The data of 1H- and 13C-NMR were consistent with those in previous reports [18, 19]. Compound5 was identified as 6-methoxy-7-hydroxycoumarin.


#### 3.1.6. Behenic Acid (6)

White powder, ESI-MS (m/z) 363 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 2.36 (2H, t,J = 7.6 Hz, H-2), 1.64 (2H, m, H-3), 1.29-1.25 (36H, brs, 18×CH2), 0.88 (3H, t,J = 7.2 Hz, CH3-22). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 179.5 (C-1), 34.0 (C-2), 32.0 (C-3), 29.8-29.1 (C-4~19), 24.8 (C-20), 22.8 (C-21), 14.2 (C-22). The data of 1H- and 13C-NMR were consistent with those in previous report [19]. Compound6 was identified as behenic acid.


#### 3.1.7. 3-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (7)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 377 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.48 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7′), 7.09 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2′), 6.95 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz, H-6′), 6.79 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.25 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8′), 5.20 (1H, m, H-3), 3.98 (1H, brs, H-5), 3.54 (1H, dd,J = 10.0, 2.0 Hz, H-4), 1.88 (2H, m, H-2), 1.73 (1H, br d,J = 13.2 Hz, H-6a), 2.06 (1H, br d,J = 12.0 Hz, H-6b); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 178.2 (C-7), 167.0 (C-9′), 149.5 (C-4′), 146.5 (C-3′), 145.4 (C-7′), 125.9 (C-1′), 121.8 (C-6′), 116.5 (C-5′), 115.4 (C-2′), 114.9 (C-8′), 76.1 (C-1), 73.7 (C-4), 71.9 (C-3), 71.8 (C-5), 40.2 (C-2), 38.6 (C-6). Based on a comparison of these NMR and ESI-MS data with data previously reported, compound7 was identified as 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid [20–22].


#### 3.1.8. 5-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (8)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 377 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 7.57 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7′), 7.05 (1H, d,J = 2.0 Hz, H-2′), 6.93 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz, H-6′), 6.78 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-5′), 6.29 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8′), 5.40 (1H, m, H-5), 4.17 (1H, m, H-3), 3.73 (1H, dd,J = 9.6, 3.2 Hz, H-4), 2.18 (2H, m, H-2a, 6a), 2.03 (2H, m, H-2b, 6b); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 178.6 (C-7), 167.9 (C-9′), 148.2 (C-4′), 145.7 (C-3′), 145.4 (C-7′), 126.5 (C-1′), 121.7 (C-6′), 115.3 (C-5′), 114.2 (C-2′), 114.0 (C-8′), 76.5 (C-1), 73.3 (C-4), 71.3 (C-3), 71.1 (C-5), 38.9 (C-2), 37.4 (C-6). Based on a comparison of these NMR and ESI-MS data with data previously reported, compound8 was identified as 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid [18, 20].


#### 3.1.9. 1,3-Di-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (9)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 539 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.49 (1H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-7′′), 7.40 (1H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-7′), 7.05 (1H, br s, H-2′′), 7.01 (1H, br s, H-2′), 6.94 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-6′′), 6.90 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-6′), 6.74 (2H, br s, H-5′′, H-5′), 6.25 (1H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-8′′), 6.18 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8′), 5.28 (1H, br s, H-3), 4.01 (1H, br s, H-5), 3.54 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-4), 2.58 (1H, m, H-6a), 2.38 (1H, m, H-2a), 2.19 (1H, m, H-6b), 1.81 (1H, m, H-2b); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 175.8 (C-7), 166.9 (C-9′′), 165.6 (C-9′), 149.9 (C-4′′), 149.1 (C-4′), 146.6 (C-3′′), 146.5 (C-3′), 145.5 (C-7′′), 144.3 (C-7′), 126.1 (C-1′′), 125.6 (C-1′), 121.9 (C-6′′), 121.2 (C-6′), 116.5 (C-5′′), 116.5 (C-5′), 115.3 (C-2′′), 115.2 (C-2′), 116.5 (C-8′), 114.7 (C-8′′), 82.4 (C-1), 73.2 (C-4), 70.9 (C-3), 69.6 (C-5), 38.3 (C-2), 35.3 (C-6). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [20, 21]. Compound9 was identified as 1,3-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid.


#### 3.1.10. 1,4-Di-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (10)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 539 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.50 (2H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-7′, 7′′), 7.02 (2H, m, H-2′, 2′′), 6.95 (2H, m, H-6′, 6′′), 6.75 (2H, m, H-5′, H-5′′), 6.24 (2H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-8′, 8′′), 5.55 (1H, br s, H-3), 4.98 (1H, br s, H-4), 4.24 (1H, br s, H-5), 2.15 (3H, m, H-6a, 6b, 2a), 1.87 (1H, br s, H-2b); 3C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 177.6 (C-7), 166.8 (C-9′′), 166.6 (C-9′), 149.2 (C-4′′), 149.2 (C-4′), 146.2 (C-3′′), 146.2 (C-3′), 146.1 (C-7′′), 146.1 (C-7′), 126.1 (C-1′′), 125.8 (C-1′), 122.0 (C-6′′), 122.0 (C-6′), 116.4 (C-5′′), 116.4 (C-5′), 115.4 (C-2′′), 115.4 (C-2′), 114.2 (C-8′′), 114.2 (C-8′), 76.8 (C-1), 76.1 (C-4), 68.4 (C-3), 69.1 (C-5), 40.2 (C-2), 38.3 (C-6). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [20, 23]. Compound10 was identified as 1,4-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid.


#### 3.1.11. 1,5-Di-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (11)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 539 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.50 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7′′), 7.38 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7′), 7.03 (2H, br s, H-2′, 2′′), 6.94 (2H, t,J = 8.0 Hz, H-6′, 6′′), 6.73 (2H, t,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′, H-5′′), 6.23 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8′′), 6.20 (1H, d,J = 16.4 Hz, H-8′), 5.18 (1H, d,J = 10.8 Hz, H-5), 3.68 (1H, br s, H-3), 3.65 (1H, br s, H-4), 2.25 (1H, t,J = 12.0 Hz, H-6a), 1.98 (3H, m, H-2a, 2b, 6b); 3C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 174.2 (C-7), 166.4 (C-9′′), 165.7 (C-9′), 148.9 (C-4′′), 148.6 (C-4′), 146.3 (C-3′′), 146.2 (C-3′), 145.3 (C-7′′), 144.3 (C-7′), 126.3 (C-1′′), 126.1 (C-1′), 121.6 (C-6′′), 121.0 (C-6′), 116.3 (C-5′′), 116.3 (C-5′), 115.5 (C-2′′), 115.4 (C-2′), 115.1 (C-8′′), 116.2 (C-8′), 83.1 (C-1), 71.4 (C-4), 69.3 (C-3), 70.1 (C-5), 40.0 (C-2), 34.0 (C-6). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [20, 21]. Compound11 was identified as 1,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid.


#### 3.1.12. (+)-Threo-(7R,8R)-Guaiacylglycerol-β-Coniferyl Aldehyde Ether (12)

White gum;α
D
20 +51.3 (c 0.33, MeOH); ESI-MS (m/z) 397 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 9.59 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-9′, -CHO), 7.58 (1H, d,J= 15.6 Hz, H-7′), 6.67 (1H, dd,J= 15.6, 8.0 Hz, H-8′), 7.17 (1H, dd,J= 8.8, 2.0 Hz, H-6′), 6.85 (1H, dd,J= 8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.99 (1H, d,J= 8.8 Hz, H-5′), 6.70 (1H, d,J= 8.0 Hz, H-5), 7.22 (1H, d,J= 2.0 Hz, H-2′), 7.03 (1H, d,J= 2.0 Hz, H-2), 4.55 (1H, m, H-8), 4.82 (1H, d,J= 6.0 Hz, H-7), 3.84 (2H, d,J= 4.8 Hz, H-9), 3.82 (3H, s, C-3′ -OCH3), 3.79 (3H, s, C-3 -OCH3); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 194.76 (C-9′, -CHO), 154.16 (C-7′), 151.35 (C-4′), 150.38 (C-3′), 147.38 (C-3), 145.79 (C-4), 132.64 (C-1), 127.96 (C-1′), 126.34 (C-8′), 123.06 (C-6′), 119.84 (C-6), 115.87 (C-5′), 114.27 (C-5), 111.36 (C-2′), 110.70 (C-2), 84.09 (C-8), 72.76 (C-7), 61.13 (C-9), 55.27 (C-3′ -OCH3), 55.00 (C-3 -OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [24]. Compound12 was identified as (+)-threo-(7R,8R)-guaiacylglycerol-β-coniferyl aldehyde ether.


#### 3.1.13. (+)-Erythro-(7S,8R)-Guaiacylglycerol-β-Coniferyl Aldehyde Ether (13)

White gum;α
D
20 +148.9 (c 0.12, MeOH); ESI-MS (m/z) 397 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 9.60 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-9′, -CHO), 7.61 (1H, d,J= 16.0 Hz, H-7′), 6.68 (1H, dd,J= 16.0, 8.0 Hz, H-8′), 7.21 (1H, dd,J= 8.4, 2.0 Hz, H-6′), 6.86 (1H, dd,J= 8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 7.09 (1H, d,J= 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.75 (1H, d,J= 8.4 Hz, H-5), 7.29 (1H, d,J= 2.0 Hz, H-2′), 7.03 (1H, d,J= 2.0 Hz, H-2), 4.52 (1H, m, H-8), 4.88 (1H, overlapped, H-7), 3.78 (1H, m, H-9a), 3.55 (1H, m, H-9b), 3.91 (3H, s, C-3′ -OCH3), 3.81 (3H, s, C-3 -OCH3); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 194.76 (C-9′, -CHO), 154.11 (C-7′), 151.66 (C-4′), 150.42 (C-3′), 147.56 (C-3), 145.89 (C-4), 132.29 (C-1), 128.07 (C-1′), 126.42 (C-8′), 123.22 (C-6′), 119.32 (C-6), 115.83 (C-5′), 114.51 (C-5), 111.36 (C-2′), 110.37 (C-2), 84.73 (C-8), 72.55 (C-7), 60.75 (C-9), 55.32 (C-3′ -OCH3), 55.00 (C-3 -OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [24]. Compound13 was identified as (+)-erythro-(7S,8R)-guaiacylglycerol-β-coniferyl aldehyde ether.


#### 3.1.14. Ferulic Acid (14)

Colorless needles (MeOH); ESI-MS (m/z) 217 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz)δ: 7.60 (1H, d,J = 15.9 Hz, H-7), 7.17 (1H, d,J = 2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.06 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.81 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-5), 6.32 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8), 3.88 (3H, s, -OCH3); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz)δ: 169.8 (C-9, -COOH), 149.2 (C-4), 148.0 (C-3), 145.5 (C-7), 126.5 (C-1), 122.6 (C-6), 115.1 (C-8), 114.8 (C-5), 110.4 (C-2), 55.1 (-OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [25]. Compound14 was identified as ferulic acid.


#### 3.1.15. Caffeic Acid (15)

Colorless needles (MeOH); ESI-MS (m/z) 203 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz)δ: 7.58 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7), 7.17 (1H, d,J = 2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.00 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.88 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-5), 6.33 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz)δ: 166.9 (C-9, -COOH), 149.1 (C-4), 146.4 (C-3), 145.3 (C-7), 126.3 (C-1), 121.8 (C-6), 116.4 (C-5), 115.3 (C-8), 115.2 (C-2). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [26]. Compound15 was identified as caffeic acid.


#### 3.1.16. Stigmasterol (16)

Colorless needles (MeOH);1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 5.32 (1H, br s, H-6), 5.15 (1H, dd,J = 15.2, 8.4 Hz, H-22), 5.01 (1H, dd,J = 15.2, 8.4 Hz, H-23), 3.52 (1H, m, H-3α), 0.97 (3H, s, H-19), 0.89 (3H, d,J = 6.4 Hz, H-21), 0.82 (3H, d,J = 6.4 Hz, H-26), 0.83 (3H, t,J = 7.6 Hz, H-29), 0.77 (3H, d,J = 6.0 Hz, H-27), 0.65 (3H, s, H-18); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 140.9 (C-5), 138.4 (C-22), 129.4 (C-23), 121.8 (C-6), 71.9 (C-3), 57.0 (C-14), 56.1 (C-17), 51.3 (C-24), 50.2 (C-9), 42.4 (C-4), 42.3 (C-13), 40.6 (C-20), 39.8 (C-12), 37.4 (C-1), 36.6 (C-10), 32.0 (C-7), 32.0 (C-8), 32.0 (C-25), 31.7 (C-2), 29.0 (C-16), 25.5 (C-28), 24.4 (C-15), 21.3 (C-11), 21.2 (C-21), 19.5 (C-26), 19.1 (C-19), 19.1 (C-27), 12.3 (C-29), 12.1 (C-18). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [27]. Compound16 was identified as stigmasterol.


#### 3.1.17.β-Sitosterol (17)

Colorless needles (MeOH);1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz),δ: 5.31 (1H, br s, H-6), 3.52 (1H, m, H-3α), 0.99 (3H, d,J = 6.8 Hz, H-21), 0.97 (3H, s, H-19), 0.82 (3H, d,J = 6.4 Hz, H-26), 0.79 (3H, t,J = 7.2 Hz, H-29), 0.77 (3H, d,J = 6.0 Hz, H-27), 0.66 (3H, s, H-18); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 140.9 (C-5), 121.8 (C-6), 71.9 (C-3), 56.9 (C-14), 56.2 (C-17), 50.2 (C-9), 45.9 (C-24), 42.4 (C-4), 42.4 (C-13), 39.9 (C-12), 37.4 (C-1), 36.6 (C-10), 36.2 (C-20), 34.0 (C-22), 32.0 (C-7), 32.0 (C-8), 31.7 (C-2), 29.3 (C-25), 28.3 (C-16), 26.2 (C-23), 24.4 (C-15), 23.2 (C-28), 21.2 (C-11), 19.9 (C-27), 19.5 (C-19), 19.1 (C-21), 18.9 (C-26), 12.1 (C-29), 11.9 (C-18). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [27]. Compound17 was identified as β-sitosterol.


#### 3.1.18. Adenosine (18)

Colorless sand crystal (MeOH), ESI-MS (m/z) 290 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 8.35 (1H, s, H-2), 8.14 (1H, s, H-4), 7.36 (2H, s, -NH2), 5.89 (1H, d,J = 6.4 Hz, H-1′), 5.46 (1H, d,J = 6.0 Hz, 2′-OH), 5.42 (1H, m, 5′-OH), 5.20 (1H, d,J = 4.8 Hz, 3′-OH), 4.62 (1H, q,J = 6.0 Hz, H-2′), 4.17 (1H, m, H-3′), 3.98 (1H, m, H-4′), 3.69 (1H, m, H-5′a), 3.57 (1H, m, H-5′b); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 156.7 (C-1), 152.9 (C-2), 149.6 (C-3), 140.5 (C-4), 119.9 (C-5), 88.5 (C-1′), 86.5 (C-4′), 74.0 (C-2′), 71.2 (C-3′), 62.3 (C-5′). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [28]. Compound18 was identified as adenosine.


#### 3.1.19. Syringin (19)

Colorless needles (MeOH), ESI-MS (m/z) 395 [M + Na]+;1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 6.74 (2H, s, H-3, 5), 6.56 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7), 6.34 (1H, dt,J = 16.0, 5.6 Hz, H-8), 4.87 (1H, overlapped, H-1′), 4.22 (2H, dd,J = 5.6, 1.2 Hz, H-9), 3.85 (6H, s, 2OCH3), 3.79 (1H, dd,J = 12.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6′a), 3.68 (1H, dd,J = 12.0, 4.8 Hz, H-6′b), 3.50-3.38 (3H, m, H-3′, 4′, 5′), 3.22 (1H, m, H-2′); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 153.0 (C-6), 153.0 (C-2), 134.6 (C-4), 133.9 (C-1), 130.0 (C-7), 128.7 (C-8), 104.1 (C-3), 104.1 (C-5), 104.0 (C-1′), 77.0 (C-5′), 76.5 (C-3′), 74.4 (C-2′), 70.0 (C-4′), 62.3 (C-9), 61.3 (C-6′), 55.7 (2OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [29, 30]. Compound19 was identified as syringin.


#### 3.1.20. Trans-Coniferin (20)

White powder, ESI-MS (m/z) 365 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 7.10 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-5), 7.05 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2), 6.95 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz, H-6), 6.55 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7), 6.30 (1H, dt,J = 16.0, 5.6 Hz, H-8), 4.89 (1H, d,J = 7.2 Hz, H-1′), 4.21 (2H, d,J = 5.2 Hz, H-9), 3.86 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.84 (1H, m, H-6′a), 3.71 (1H, dd,J = 12.0, 4.8 Hz, H-6′b), 3.50 (2H, m, H-4′, 5′), 3.41 (2H, m, H-2′, 3′); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 149.6 (C-3), 146.3 (C-4), 132.3 (C-1), 130.0 (C-7), 127.6 (C-8), 119.4 (C-6), 116.6 (C-5), 110.0 (C-2), 101.4 (C-1′), 76.9 (C-5′), 76.5 (C-3′), 73.6 (C-2′), 70.0 (C-4′), 62.4 (C-9), 61.2 (C-6′), 55.4 (OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [30]. Compound20 was identified astrans-coniferin.The chemical structures of compounds1–20 are shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
The chemical structures of compounds1-20.


### 3.2. Effects of Compounds on NO and PGE2 Production in LPS-Induced BV2 Microglial Cells

Among the isolated compounds fromA. henryi, we selected 13 compounds (compounds1–3,5,7,9,10,11,14,15, and18–20) based on their number of publications, and these compounds were screened for anti-inflammatory effects, including the inhibition of NO and PGE2 production, in LPS-stimulated BV2 microglial cells. BV2 cells were pretreated with the compounds for 3 h and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. The concentration required to inhibit the production of NO by 50% (IC50 value) was calculated based on the concentrations of NO and PGE2 released into the culture media as measured by the Griess method and PGE2 ELISA kit, respectively. Among the tested compounds, only compound3 showed inhibitory effects against LPS-induced NO production with an IC50 value of 2.22 ± 0.11 μM and LPS-induced PGE2 production with an IC50 value of 2.28 ± 0.23 μM. The IC50 values of butein, a positive control, were 4.41 ± 0.45 μM in NO production and 3.26 ± 0.53 μM in PGE2 production, respectively. At tested concentrations, all test compounds did not show cytotoxic effects to BV2 cells (data not shown). Therefore, compound3 was further investigated to elucidate the up-stream signaling pathways of its antineuroinflammatory effect.


### 3.3. Effect of Compound3 on LPS-Induced Expression of iNOS and COX-2 Protein in BV2 Microglial Cells

Inhibition of iNOS and COX-2 protein expression could be an important strategy to prevent neuroinflammation. In the present study, it was investigated whether compound3 inhibits LPS-induced overexpression of iNOS and COX-2 protein in BV2 cells. BV2 cells were pretreated with compound3 for 3 h and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. As a result, LPS augmented the expression of iNOS and COX-2 proteins; however, pretreatment with compound3reversed these responses (Figure 2).Figure 2
The effect of compound3 on LPS-induced iNOS and COX-2 protein expression in BV2 microglial cells. Cells were pretreated with/without the indicated concentrations of compound3 for 3 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. The levels of iNOS and COX-2 were determined by Western blot analysis. The experiment was repeated three times, and similar results were obtained.
(a)
(b)


### 3.4. Effect of Compound3 on LPS-Induced Up-Regulation of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines

To investigate whether compound3 inhibits the production of LPS-induced proinflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, BV2 cells were pretreated with compound3 for 3 h and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. Pretreatment with compound3 attenuated the LPS-induced production of IL-1β and TNF-α, but it had little effect on IL-6 production (Figures 3(a)–3(c)). Subsequently, to elucidate how compound3 inhibits proinflammatory cytokine production, the mRNA levels of the cytokines were examined. BV2 cells were pretreated with compound3 for 3 h and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 6 h. Consistent with the results obtained from the cytokine production data, pretreatment with compound3 reduced the LPS-induced mRNA levels of IL-1β and TNF-α, but it did not affect to mRNA level of IL-6 (Figures 3(d)–3(f)). These results suggested that compound3 exhibits the antineuroinflammatory effects by negatively regulating the production of IL-1β and TNF-α at the transcriptional level in LPS-challenged BV2 microglial cells.Figure 3
Effects of compound3 on LPS-induced production and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and their mRNA, IL-1β (a, d), IL-6 (b, e), and TNF-α (c, f) in BV2 microglial cells. Cells were pretreated with/without the indicated concentrations of compound3 for 3 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h and 6 h, respectively. The concentrations of cytokines were measured by ELISA, and the mRNA levels of the proinflammatory cytokines were analyzed by qRT-PCR. p
∗ < 0.05, p
∗
∗ < 0.01, and p
∗
∗
∗ < 0.001 in comparison with LPS-treated group.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


### 3.5. Effect of Compound3 on LPS-Induced Activation of MAPK Pathway in BV2 Cells

We examined whether the antineuroinflammatory effects of compound3 contribute to the inactivation of MAPK in the present study. BV2 cells were pretreated with compound3 for 3 h and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 30 min. LPS markedly increased the phosphorylation of p38, JNK, and ERK. Pretreatment with compound3 inhibited the phosphorylation of p38 (Figure 4(a)), but it had no effect on the phosphorylation of JNK and ERK (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)).Figure 4
Effects of compound3 on the LPS-induced activation of MAPK pathways in BV2 microglial cells. Lysates were prepared from cells pretreated with/without the indicated concentrations of compound3 for 3 h and then with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 30 min. The levels of p-p38, p38, p-ERK, ERK, p-JNK, and JNK were determined by Western blot analysis. Actin was used as a loading control. The experiment was repeated three times, and similar results were obtained.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.1. Structure Determination

### 3.1.1. (-)-Sesamin (1)

Colorless needles (MeOH),α
D
20 -46.7 (c 6.10, CHCl3), ESI-MS (m/z) 377 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 3.05 (2H, m, H-8, H-8′), 3.86 (2H, dd,J = 9.2, 3.6 Hz, H-9a, H-9′a), 4.23 (2H, dd,J = 9.2, 6.8 Hz, H-9e, H-9′e), 4.71 (2H, d,J = 4.4 Hz, H-7, H-7′), 5.94 (4H, s, 2OCH2O), 6.76-6.81 (4H, m, H-5, H-6, H-5′, H-6′), 6.84 (2H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2, H-2′); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ:148.1 (C-3, C-3′), 147.2 (C-4, C-4′), 135.2 (C-l, C-1′), 119.4 (C-6, C-6′), 108.3 (C-5, C-5′), 106.6 (C-2, C-2′), 101.2 (2OCH2O), 85.9 (C-7, C-7′), 71.8 (C-9, C-9′), 54.4 (C-8, C-8′). Based on a comparison of these 1H- and 13C-NMR data with data previously reported [16], compound1 was identified as (-)-sesamin.


### 3.1.2. Helioxanthin (2)

Light yellow powder, ESI-MS (m/z) 371 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 8.55 (1H, s, H-7), 7.94 (1H, d,J = 8.8 Hz, H-6), 6.90 (1H, dd,J = 1.6, 8.0 Hz, H-6′), 7.51 (1H, d,J = 8.8 Hz, H-5), 7.01 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2′), 6.96 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.01, 5.99 (each 1H, d,J = 1.2 Hz, H-10), 6.12, 6.07 (each 1H, d,J = 0.8 Hz, H-10′), 5.28 (2H, s, H-9′); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 171.0 (C-9, C=O), 147.4 (C-4′), 147.3 (C-3′), 147.1 (C-3), 141.7 (C-4), 140.6 (C-8), 130.9 (C-1), 130.6 (C-1′), 128.9 (C-7′), 127.5 (C-7), 126.3 (C-6), 123.3 (C-6′), 121.3 (C-2), 121.2 (C-8′), 112.3 (C-5), 110.4 (C-2′), 108.3 (C-5′), 101.9 (C-10, -OCH2O-), 101.7 (C-10′, -OCH2O-), 69.9 (C-9′, lactone, -CH2-). The data of 1H- and 13C-NMR were consistent with those in previous report [16]. Compound2 was identified as helioxanthin.


### 3.1.3. Savinin (3)

Light yellow powder,α
D
16 -35.5 (c 0.20, CHCl3), ESI-MS (m/z) 375 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.50 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-7), 7.08 (1H, dd,J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, H-6), 7.03 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2), 6.88 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5), 6.73 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.66 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2′), 6.64 (1H, dd,J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, H-6′), 6.03 (2H, s, -OCH2O-, H-10), 5.93 (2H, m, -OCH2O-, H-10′), 4.25 (2H, m, H-9′), 3.75 (1H, m, H-8′), 3.00 (1H, dd,J = 14.4, 4.4 Hz, H-7′e), 2.61 (1H, dd,J = 14.4, 10.0 Hz, H-7′a); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 172.6 (C-9, C=O), 149.3 (C-4), 148.4 (C-3), 148.0 (C-3′), 146.6 (C-4′), 137.4 (C-7), 131.6 (C-1′), 128.3 (C-1), 126.2 (C-6), 125.9 (C-8), 122.2 (C-6′), 109.2 (C-2′), 108.9 (C-5′), 108.8 (C-2), 108.6 (C-5), 101.8 (C-10, -OCH2O-), 101.1 (C-10′, -OCH2O-), 69.6 (C-9′, lactone, -CH2-), 40.0 (C-8′), 37.6 (C-7′). Based on a comparison of these NMR and ESI-MS data with the data reported previously [16], compound3 was identified as savinin.


### 3.1.4. Taiwanin C (4)

Light yellow powder, ESI-MS (m/z) 371 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.95 (1H, s, H-7′), 7.53 (1H, s, H-2′), 7.05 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5), 6.90 (1H, s, H-5′), 6.88 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2), 6.76 (1H, dd,J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, H-6), 6.19 (2H, d,J = 2.0 Hz, H-10′), 6.15, 6.11 (each 1H, d,J = 0.8 Hz, H-10), 5.43 (2H, brs, H-9′); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 169.8 (C-9, C=O), 150.2 (C-4′), 149.0 (C-3′), 147.6 (C-3), 147.6 (C-4), 140.9 (C-7), 139.3 (C-8′), 134.9 (C-6′), 130.0 (C-1′), 128.9 (C-1), 123.9 (C-6), 119.0 (C-8), 120.2 (C-7′), 111.0 (C-2), 108.6 (C-5), 104.3 (C-2′), 102.7 (C-5′), 102.7 (C-10′, -OCH2O-), 101.7 (C-10, -OCH2O-), 68.5 (C-9′, lactone, -CH2-). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [17]. Compound4 was identified as taiwanin C.


### 3.1.5. 6-Methoxy-7-Hydroxycoumarin (5)

Colorless needles (MeOH), UV 254 nm and 365 nm were blue-fluorescence, ESI-MS (m/z) 215 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 7.85 (1H, d,J = 9.6 Hz, H-4), 7.09 (1H, s, H-5), 6.76 (1H, s, H-8), 6.20 (1H, d,J = 9.6 Hz, H-3), 3.90 (3H, s, -OCH3); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 162.7 (C-2), 151.7 (C-7), 150.1 (C-9), 145.8 (C-6), 144.8 (C-4), 111.3 (C-3), 111.2 (C-10), 108.7 (C-5), 102.7 (C-8), 55.5 (-OCH3). The data of 1H- and 13C-NMR were consistent with those in previous reports [18, 19]. Compound5 was identified as 6-methoxy-7-hydroxycoumarin.


### 3.1.6. Behenic Acid (6)

White powder, ESI-MS (m/z) 363 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 2.36 (2H, t,J = 7.6 Hz, H-2), 1.64 (2H, m, H-3), 1.29-1.25 (36H, brs, 18×CH2), 0.88 (3H, t,J = 7.2 Hz, CH3-22). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 179.5 (C-1), 34.0 (C-2), 32.0 (C-3), 29.8-29.1 (C-4~19), 24.8 (C-20), 22.8 (C-21), 14.2 (C-22). The data of 1H- and 13C-NMR were consistent with those in previous report [19]. Compound6 was identified as behenic acid.


### 3.1.7. 3-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (7)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 377 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.48 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7′), 7.09 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2′), 6.95 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz, H-6′), 6.79 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.25 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8′), 5.20 (1H, m, H-3), 3.98 (1H, brs, H-5), 3.54 (1H, dd,J = 10.0, 2.0 Hz, H-4), 1.88 (2H, m, H-2), 1.73 (1H, br d,J = 13.2 Hz, H-6a), 2.06 (1H, br d,J = 12.0 Hz, H-6b); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 178.2 (C-7), 167.0 (C-9′), 149.5 (C-4′), 146.5 (C-3′), 145.4 (C-7′), 125.9 (C-1′), 121.8 (C-6′), 116.5 (C-5′), 115.4 (C-2′), 114.9 (C-8′), 76.1 (C-1), 73.7 (C-4), 71.9 (C-3), 71.8 (C-5), 40.2 (C-2), 38.6 (C-6). Based on a comparison of these NMR and ESI-MS data with data previously reported, compound7 was identified as 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid [20–22].


### 3.1.8. 5-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (8)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 377 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 7.57 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7′), 7.05 (1H, d,J = 2.0 Hz, H-2′), 6.93 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz, H-6′), 6.78 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-5′), 6.29 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8′), 5.40 (1H, m, H-5), 4.17 (1H, m, H-3), 3.73 (1H, dd,J = 9.6, 3.2 Hz, H-4), 2.18 (2H, m, H-2a, 6a), 2.03 (2H, m, H-2b, 6b); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 178.6 (C-7), 167.9 (C-9′), 148.2 (C-4′), 145.7 (C-3′), 145.4 (C-7′), 126.5 (C-1′), 121.7 (C-6′), 115.3 (C-5′), 114.2 (C-2′), 114.0 (C-8′), 76.5 (C-1), 73.3 (C-4), 71.3 (C-3), 71.1 (C-5), 38.9 (C-2), 37.4 (C-6). Based on a comparison of these NMR and ESI-MS data with data previously reported, compound8 was identified as 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid [18, 20].


### 3.1.9. 1,3-Di-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (9)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 539 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.49 (1H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-7′′), 7.40 (1H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-7′), 7.05 (1H, br s, H-2′′), 7.01 (1H, br s, H-2′), 6.94 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-6′′), 6.90 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-6′), 6.74 (2H, br s, H-5′′, H-5′), 6.25 (1H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-8′′), 6.18 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8′), 5.28 (1H, br s, H-3), 4.01 (1H, br s, H-5), 3.54 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-4), 2.58 (1H, m, H-6a), 2.38 (1H, m, H-2a), 2.19 (1H, m, H-6b), 1.81 (1H, m, H-2b); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 175.8 (C-7), 166.9 (C-9′′), 165.6 (C-9′), 149.9 (C-4′′), 149.1 (C-4′), 146.6 (C-3′′), 146.5 (C-3′), 145.5 (C-7′′), 144.3 (C-7′), 126.1 (C-1′′), 125.6 (C-1′), 121.9 (C-6′′), 121.2 (C-6′), 116.5 (C-5′′), 116.5 (C-5′), 115.3 (C-2′′), 115.2 (C-2′), 116.5 (C-8′), 114.7 (C-8′′), 82.4 (C-1), 73.2 (C-4), 70.9 (C-3), 69.6 (C-5), 38.3 (C-2), 35.3 (C-6). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [20, 21]. Compound9 was identified as 1,3-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid.


### 3.1.10. 1,4-Di-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (10)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 539 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.50 (2H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-7′, 7′′), 7.02 (2H, m, H-2′, 2′′), 6.95 (2H, m, H-6′, 6′′), 6.75 (2H, m, H-5′, H-5′′), 6.24 (2H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-8′, 8′′), 5.55 (1H, br s, H-3), 4.98 (1H, br s, H-4), 4.24 (1H, br s, H-5), 2.15 (3H, m, H-6a, 6b, 2a), 1.87 (1H, br s, H-2b); 3C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 177.6 (C-7), 166.8 (C-9′′), 166.6 (C-9′), 149.2 (C-4′′), 149.2 (C-4′), 146.2 (C-3′′), 146.2 (C-3′), 146.1 (C-7′′), 146.1 (C-7′), 126.1 (C-1′′), 125.8 (C-1′), 122.0 (C-6′′), 122.0 (C-6′), 116.4 (C-5′′), 116.4 (C-5′), 115.4 (C-2′′), 115.4 (C-2′), 114.2 (C-8′′), 114.2 (C-8′), 76.8 (C-1), 76.1 (C-4), 68.4 (C-3), 69.1 (C-5), 40.2 (C-2), 38.3 (C-6). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [20, 23]. Compound10 was identified as 1,4-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid.


### 3.1.11. 1,5-Di-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (11)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 539 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.50 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7′′), 7.38 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7′), 7.03 (2H, br s, H-2′, 2′′), 6.94 (2H, t,J = 8.0 Hz, H-6′, 6′′), 6.73 (2H, t,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′, H-5′′), 6.23 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8′′), 6.20 (1H, d,J = 16.4 Hz, H-8′), 5.18 (1H, d,J = 10.8 Hz, H-5), 3.68 (1H, br s, H-3), 3.65 (1H, br s, H-4), 2.25 (1H, t,J = 12.0 Hz, H-6a), 1.98 (3H, m, H-2a, 2b, 6b); 3C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 174.2 (C-7), 166.4 (C-9′′), 165.7 (C-9′), 148.9 (C-4′′), 148.6 (C-4′), 146.3 (C-3′′), 146.2 (C-3′), 145.3 (C-7′′), 144.3 (C-7′), 126.3 (C-1′′), 126.1 (C-1′), 121.6 (C-6′′), 121.0 (C-6′), 116.3 (C-5′′), 116.3 (C-5′), 115.5 (C-2′′), 115.4 (C-2′), 115.1 (C-8′′), 116.2 (C-8′), 83.1 (C-1), 71.4 (C-4), 69.3 (C-3), 70.1 (C-5), 40.0 (C-2), 34.0 (C-6). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [20, 21]. Compound11 was identified as 1,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid.


### 3.1.12. (+)-Threo-(7R,8R)-Guaiacylglycerol-β-Coniferyl Aldehyde Ether (12)

White gum;α
D
20 +51.3 (c 0.33, MeOH); ESI-MS (m/z) 397 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 9.59 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-9′, -CHO), 7.58 (1H, d,J= 15.6 Hz, H-7′), 6.67 (1H, dd,J= 15.6, 8.0 Hz, H-8′), 7.17 (1H, dd,J= 8.8, 2.0 Hz, H-6′), 6.85 (1H, dd,J= 8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.99 (1H, d,J= 8.8 Hz, H-5′), 6.70 (1H, d,J= 8.0 Hz, H-5), 7.22 (1H, d,J= 2.0 Hz, H-2′), 7.03 (1H, d,J= 2.0 Hz, H-2), 4.55 (1H, m, H-8), 4.82 (1H, d,J= 6.0 Hz, H-7), 3.84 (2H, d,J= 4.8 Hz, H-9), 3.82 (3H, s, C-3′ -OCH3), 3.79 (3H, s, C-3 -OCH3); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 194.76 (C-9′, -CHO), 154.16 (C-7′), 151.35 (C-4′), 150.38 (C-3′), 147.38 (C-3), 145.79 (C-4), 132.64 (C-1), 127.96 (C-1′), 126.34 (C-8′), 123.06 (C-6′), 119.84 (C-6), 115.87 (C-5′), 114.27 (C-5), 111.36 (C-2′), 110.70 (C-2), 84.09 (C-8), 72.76 (C-7), 61.13 (C-9), 55.27 (C-3′ -OCH3), 55.00 (C-3 -OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [24]. Compound12 was identified as (+)-threo-(7R,8R)-guaiacylglycerol-β-coniferyl aldehyde ether.


### 3.1.13. (+)-Erythro-(7S,8R)-Guaiacylglycerol-β-Coniferyl Aldehyde Ether (13)

White gum;α
D
20 +148.9 (c 0.12, MeOH); ESI-MS (m/z) 397 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 9.60 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-9′, -CHO), 7.61 (1H, d,J= 16.0 Hz, H-7′), 6.68 (1H, dd,J= 16.0, 8.0 Hz, H-8′), 7.21 (1H, dd,J= 8.4, 2.0 Hz, H-6′), 6.86 (1H, dd,J= 8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 7.09 (1H, d,J= 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.75 (1H, d,J= 8.4 Hz, H-5), 7.29 (1H, d,J= 2.0 Hz, H-2′), 7.03 (1H, d,J= 2.0 Hz, H-2), 4.52 (1H, m, H-8), 4.88 (1H, overlapped, H-7), 3.78 (1H, m, H-9a), 3.55 (1H, m, H-9b), 3.91 (3H, s, C-3′ -OCH3), 3.81 (3H, s, C-3 -OCH3); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 194.76 (C-9′, -CHO), 154.11 (C-7′), 151.66 (C-4′), 150.42 (C-3′), 147.56 (C-3), 145.89 (C-4), 132.29 (C-1), 128.07 (C-1′), 126.42 (C-8′), 123.22 (C-6′), 119.32 (C-6), 115.83 (C-5′), 114.51 (C-5), 111.36 (C-2′), 110.37 (C-2), 84.73 (C-8), 72.55 (C-7), 60.75 (C-9), 55.32 (C-3′ -OCH3), 55.00 (C-3 -OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [24]. Compound13 was identified as (+)-erythro-(7S,8R)-guaiacylglycerol-β-coniferyl aldehyde ether.


### 3.1.14. Ferulic Acid (14)

Colorless needles (MeOH); ESI-MS (m/z) 217 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz)δ: 7.60 (1H, d,J = 15.9 Hz, H-7), 7.17 (1H, d,J = 2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.06 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.81 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-5), 6.32 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8), 3.88 (3H, s, -OCH3); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz)δ: 169.8 (C-9, -COOH), 149.2 (C-4), 148.0 (C-3), 145.5 (C-7), 126.5 (C-1), 122.6 (C-6), 115.1 (C-8), 114.8 (C-5), 110.4 (C-2), 55.1 (-OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [25]. Compound14 was identified as ferulic acid.


### 3.1.15. Caffeic Acid (15)

Colorless needles (MeOH); ESI-MS (m/z) 203 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz)δ: 7.58 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7), 7.17 (1H, d,J = 2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.00 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.88 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-5), 6.33 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz)δ: 166.9 (C-9, -COOH), 149.1 (C-4), 146.4 (C-3), 145.3 (C-7), 126.3 (C-1), 121.8 (C-6), 116.4 (C-5), 115.3 (C-8), 115.2 (C-2). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [26]. Compound15 was identified as caffeic acid.


### 3.1.16. Stigmasterol (16)

Colorless needles (MeOH);1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 5.32 (1H, br s, H-6), 5.15 (1H, dd,J = 15.2, 8.4 Hz, H-22), 5.01 (1H, dd,J = 15.2, 8.4 Hz, H-23), 3.52 (1H, m, H-3α), 0.97 (3H, s, H-19), 0.89 (3H, d,J = 6.4 Hz, H-21), 0.82 (3H, d,J = 6.4 Hz, H-26), 0.83 (3H, t,J = 7.6 Hz, H-29), 0.77 (3H, d,J = 6.0 Hz, H-27), 0.65 (3H, s, H-18); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 140.9 (C-5), 138.4 (C-22), 129.4 (C-23), 121.8 (C-6), 71.9 (C-3), 57.0 (C-14), 56.1 (C-17), 51.3 (C-24), 50.2 (C-9), 42.4 (C-4), 42.3 (C-13), 40.6 (C-20), 39.8 (C-12), 37.4 (C-1), 36.6 (C-10), 32.0 (C-7), 32.0 (C-8), 32.0 (C-25), 31.7 (C-2), 29.0 (C-16), 25.5 (C-28), 24.4 (C-15), 21.3 (C-11), 21.2 (C-21), 19.5 (C-26), 19.1 (C-19), 19.1 (C-27), 12.3 (C-29), 12.1 (C-18). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [27]. Compound16 was identified as stigmasterol.


### 3.1.17.β-Sitosterol (17)

Colorless needles (MeOH);1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz),δ: 5.31 (1H, br s, H-6), 3.52 (1H, m, H-3α), 0.99 (3H, d,J = 6.8 Hz, H-21), 0.97 (3H, s, H-19), 0.82 (3H, d,J = 6.4 Hz, H-26), 0.79 (3H, t,J = 7.2 Hz, H-29), 0.77 (3H, d,J = 6.0 Hz, H-27), 0.66 (3H, s, H-18); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 140.9 (C-5), 121.8 (C-6), 71.9 (C-3), 56.9 (C-14), 56.2 (C-17), 50.2 (C-9), 45.9 (C-24), 42.4 (C-4), 42.4 (C-13), 39.9 (C-12), 37.4 (C-1), 36.6 (C-10), 36.2 (C-20), 34.0 (C-22), 32.0 (C-7), 32.0 (C-8), 31.7 (C-2), 29.3 (C-25), 28.3 (C-16), 26.2 (C-23), 24.4 (C-15), 23.2 (C-28), 21.2 (C-11), 19.9 (C-27), 19.5 (C-19), 19.1 (C-21), 18.9 (C-26), 12.1 (C-29), 11.9 (C-18). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [27]. Compound17 was identified as β-sitosterol.


### 3.1.18. Adenosine (18)

Colorless sand crystal (MeOH), ESI-MS (m/z) 290 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 8.35 (1H, s, H-2), 8.14 (1H, s, H-4), 7.36 (2H, s, -NH2), 5.89 (1H, d,J = 6.4 Hz, H-1′), 5.46 (1H, d,J = 6.0 Hz, 2′-OH), 5.42 (1H, m, 5′-OH), 5.20 (1H, d,J = 4.8 Hz, 3′-OH), 4.62 (1H, q,J = 6.0 Hz, H-2′), 4.17 (1H, m, H-3′), 3.98 (1H, m, H-4′), 3.69 (1H, m, H-5′a), 3.57 (1H, m, H-5′b); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 156.7 (C-1), 152.9 (C-2), 149.6 (C-3), 140.5 (C-4), 119.9 (C-5), 88.5 (C-1′), 86.5 (C-4′), 74.0 (C-2′), 71.2 (C-3′), 62.3 (C-5′). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [28]. Compound18 was identified as adenosine.


### 3.1.19. Syringin (19)

Colorless needles (MeOH), ESI-MS (m/z) 395 [M + Na]+;1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 6.74 (2H, s, H-3, 5), 6.56 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7), 6.34 (1H, dt,J = 16.0, 5.6 Hz, H-8), 4.87 (1H, overlapped, H-1′), 4.22 (2H, dd,J = 5.6, 1.2 Hz, H-9), 3.85 (6H, s, 2OCH3), 3.79 (1H, dd,J = 12.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6′a), 3.68 (1H, dd,J = 12.0, 4.8 Hz, H-6′b), 3.50-3.38 (3H, m, H-3′, 4′, 5′), 3.22 (1H, m, H-2′); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 153.0 (C-6), 153.0 (C-2), 134.6 (C-4), 133.9 (C-1), 130.0 (C-7), 128.7 (C-8), 104.1 (C-3), 104.1 (C-5), 104.0 (C-1′), 77.0 (C-5′), 76.5 (C-3′), 74.4 (C-2′), 70.0 (C-4′), 62.3 (C-9), 61.3 (C-6′), 55.7 (2OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [29, 30]. Compound19 was identified as syringin.


### 3.1.20. Trans-Coniferin (20)

White powder, ESI-MS (m/z) 365 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 7.10 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-5), 7.05 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2), 6.95 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz, H-6), 6.55 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7), 6.30 (1H, dt,J = 16.0, 5.6 Hz, H-8), 4.89 (1H, d,J = 7.2 Hz, H-1′), 4.21 (2H, d,J = 5.2 Hz, H-9), 3.86 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.84 (1H, m, H-6′a), 3.71 (1H, dd,J = 12.0, 4.8 Hz, H-6′b), 3.50 (2H, m, H-4′, 5′), 3.41 (2H, m, H-2′, 3′); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 149.6 (C-3), 146.3 (C-4), 132.3 (C-1), 130.0 (C-7), 127.6 (C-8), 119.4 (C-6), 116.6 (C-5), 110.0 (C-2), 101.4 (C-1′), 76.9 (C-5′), 76.5 (C-3′), 73.6 (C-2′), 70.0 (C-4′), 62.4 (C-9), 61.2 (C-6′), 55.4 (OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [30]. Compound20 was identified astrans-coniferin.The chemical structures of compounds1–20 are shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
The chemical structures of compounds1-20.


## 3.1.1. (-)-Sesamin (1)

Colorless needles (MeOH),α
D
20 -46.7 (c 6.10, CHCl3), ESI-MS (m/z) 377 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 3.05 (2H, m, H-8, H-8′), 3.86 (2H, dd,J = 9.2, 3.6 Hz, H-9a, H-9′a), 4.23 (2H, dd,J = 9.2, 6.8 Hz, H-9e, H-9′e), 4.71 (2H, d,J = 4.4 Hz, H-7, H-7′), 5.94 (4H, s, 2OCH2O), 6.76-6.81 (4H, m, H-5, H-6, H-5′, H-6′), 6.84 (2H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2, H-2′); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ:148.1 (C-3, C-3′), 147.2 (C-4, C-4′), 135.2 (C-l, C-1′), 119.4 (C-6, C-6′), 108.3 (C-5, C-5′), 106.6 (C-2, C-2′), 101.2 (2OCH2O), 85.9 (C-7, C-7′), 71.8 (C-9, C-9′), 54.4 (C-8, C-8′). Based on a comparison of these 1H- and 13C-NMR data with data previously reported [16], compound1 was identified as (-)-sesamin.


## 3.1.2. Helioxanthin (2)

Light yellow powder, ESI-MS (m/z) 371 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 8.55 (1H, s, H-7), 7.94 (1H, d,J = 8.8 Hz, H-6), 6.90 (1H, dd,J = 1.6, 8.0 Hz, H-6′), 7.51 (1H, d,J = 8.8 Hz, H-5), 7.01 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2′), 6.96 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.01, 5.99 (each 1H, d,J = 1.2 Hz, H-10), 6.12, 6.07 (each 1H, d,J = 0.8 Hz, H-10′), 5.28 (2H, s, H-9′); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 171.0 (C-9, C=O), 147.4 (C-4′), 147.3 (C-3′), 147.1 (C-3), 141.7 (C-4), 140.6 (C-8), 130.9 (C-1), 130.6 (C-1′), 128.9 (C-7′), 127.5 (C-7), 126.3 (C-6), 123.3 (C-6′), 121.3 (C-2), 121.2 (C-8′), 112.3 (C-5), 110.4 (C-2′), 108.3 (C-5′), 101.9 (C-10, -OCH2O-), 101.7 (C-10′, -OCH2O-), 69.9 (C-9′, lactone, -CH2-). The data of 1H- and 13C-NMR were consistent with those in previous report [16]. Compound2 was identified as helioxanthin.


## 3.1.3. Savinin (3)

Light yellow powder,α
D
16 -35.5 (c 0.20, CHCl3), ESI-MS (m/z) 375 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.50 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-7), 7.08 (1H, dd,J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, H-6), 7.03 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2), 6.88 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5), 6.73 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.66 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2′), 6.64 (1H, dd,J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, H-6′), 6.03 (2H, s, -OCH2O-, H-10), 5.93 (2H, m, -OCH2O-, H-10′), 4.25 (2H, m, H-9′), 3.75 (1H, m, H-8′), 3.00 (1H, dd,J = 14.4, 4.4 Hz, H-7′e), 2.61 (1H, dd,J = 14.4, 10.0 Hz, H-7′a); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 172.6 (C-9, C=O), 149.3 (C-4), 148.4 (C-3), 148.0 (C-3′), 146.6 (C-4′), 137.4 (C-7), 131.6 (C-1′), 128.3 (C-1), 126.2 (C-6), 125.9 (C-8), 122.2 (C-6′), 109.2 (C-2′), 108.9 (C-5′), 108.8 (C-2), 108.6 (C-5), 101.8 (C-10, -OCH2O-), 101.1 (C-10′, -OCH2O-), 69.6 (C-9′, lactone, -CH2-), 40.0 (C-8′), 37.6 (C-7′). Based on a comparison of these NMR and ESI-MS data with the data reported previously [16], compound3 was identified as savinin.


## 3.1.4. Taiwanin C (4)

Light yellow powder, ESI-MS (m/z) 371 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.95 (1H, s, H-7′), 7.53 (1H, s, H-2′), 7.05 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5), 6.90 (1H, s, H-5′), 6.88 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2), 6.76 (1H, dd,J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, H-6), 6.19 (2H, d,J = 2.0 Hz, H-10′), 6.15, 6.11 (each 1H, d,J = 0.8 Hz, H-10), 5.43 (2H, brs, H-9′); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 169.8 (C-9, C=O), 150.2 (C-4′), 149.0 (C-3′), 147.6 (C-3), 147.6 (C-4), 140.9 (C-7), 139.3 (C-8′), 134.9 (C-6′), 130.0 (C-1′), 128.9 (C-1), 123.9 (C-6), 119.0 (C-8), 120.2 (C-7′), 111.0 (C-2), 108.6 (C-5), 104.3 (C-2′), 102.7 (C-5′), 102.7 (C-10′, -OCH2O-), 101.7 (C-10, -OCH2O-), 68.5 (C-9′, lactone, -CH2-). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [17]. Compound4 was identified as taiwanin C.


## 3.1.5. 6-Methoxy-7-Hydroxycoumarin (5)

Colorless needles (MeOH), UV 254 nm and 365 nm were blue-fluorescence, ESI-MS (m/z) 215 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 7.85 (1H, d,J = 9.6 Hz, H-4), 7.09 (1H, s, H-5), 6.76 (1H, s, H-8), 6.20 (1H, d,J = 9.6 Hz, H-3), 3.90 (3H, s, -OCH3); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 162.7 (C-2), 151.7 (C-7), 150.1 (C-9), 145.8 (C-6), 144.8 (C-4), 111.3 (C-3), 111.2 (C-10), 108.7 (C-5), 102.7 (C-8), 55.5 (-OCH3). The data of 1H- and 13C-NMR were consistent with those in previous reports [18, 19]. Compound5 was identified as 6-methoxy-7-hydroxycoumarin.


## 3.1.6. Behenic Acid (6)

White powder, ESI-MS (m/z) 363 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 2.36 (2H, t,J = 7.6 Hz, H-2), 1.64 (2H, m, H-3), 1.29-1.25 (36H, brs, 18×CH2), 0.88 (3H, t,J = 7.2 Hz, CH3-22). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 179.5 (C-1), 34.0 (C-2), 32.0 (C-3), 29.8-29.1 (C-4~19), 24.8 (C-20), 22.8 (C-21), 14.2 (C-22). The data of 1H- and 13C-NMR were consistent with those in previous report [19]. Compound6 was identified as behenic acid.


## 3.1.7. 3-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (7)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 377 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.48 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7′), 7.09 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2′), 6.95 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz, H-6′), 6.79 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.25 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8′), 5.20 (1H, m, H-3), 3.98 (1H, brs, H-5), 3.54 (1H, dd,J = 10.0, 2.0 Hz, H-4), 1.88 (2H, m, H-2), 1.73 (1H, br d,J = 13.2 Hz, H-6a), 2.06 (1H, br d,J = 12.0 Hz, H-6b); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 178.2 (C-7), 167.0 (C-9′), 149.5 (C-4′), 146.5 (C-3′), 145.4 (C-7′), 125.9 (C-1′), 121.8 (C-6′), 116.5 (C-5′), 115.4 (C-2′), 114.9 (C-8′), 76.1 (C-1), 73.7 (C-4), 71.9 (C-3), 71.8 (C-5), 40.2 (C-2), 38.6 (C-6). Based on a comparison of these NMR and ESI-MS data with data previously reported, compound7 was identified as 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid [20–22].


## 3.1.8. 5-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (8)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 377 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 7.57 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7′), 7.05 (1H, d,J = 2.0 Hz, H-2′), 6.93 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz, H-6′), 6.78 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-5′), 6.29 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8′), 5.40 (1H, m, H-5), 4.17 (1H, m, H-3), 3.73 (1H, dd,J = 9.6, 3.2 Hz, H-4), 2.18 (2H, m, H-2a, 6a), 2.03 (2H, m, H-2b, 6b); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 178.6 (C-7), 167.9 (C-9′), 148.2 (C-4′), 145.7 (C-3′), 145.4 (C-7′), 126.5 (C-1′), 121.7 (C-6′), 115.3 (C-5′), 114.2 (C-2′), 114.0 (C-8′), 76.5 (C-1), 73.3 (C-4), 71.3 (C-3), 71.1 (C-5), 38.9 (C-2), 37.4 (C-6). Based on a comparison of these NMR and ESI-MS data with data previously reported, compound8 was identified as 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid [18, 20].


## 3.1.9. 1,3-Di-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (9)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 539 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.49 (1H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-7′′), 7.40 (1H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-7′), 7.05 (1H, br s, H-2′′), 7.01 (1H, br s, H-2′), 6.94 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-6′′), 6.90 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-6′), 6.74 (2H, br s, H-5′′, H-5′), 6.25 (1H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-8′′), 6.18 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8′), 5.28 (1H, br s, H-3), 4.01 (1H, br s, H-5), 3.54 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-4), 2.58 (1H, m, H-6a), 2.38 (1H, m, H-2a), 2.19 (1H, m, H-6b), 1.81 (1H, m, H-2b); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 175.8 (C-7), 166.9 (C-9′′), 165.6 (C-9′), 149.9 (C-4′′), 149.1 (C-4′), 146.6 (C-3′′), 146.5 (C-3′), 145.5 (C-7′′), 144.3 (C-7′), 126.1 (C-1′′), 125.6 (C-1′), 121.9 (C-6′′), 121.2 (C-6′), 116.5 (C-5′′), 116.5 (C-5′), 115.3 (C-2′′), 115.2 (C-2′), 116.5 (C-8′), 114.7 (C-8′′), 82.4 (C-1), 73.2 (C-4), 70.9 (C-3), 69.6 (C-5), 38.3 (C-2), 35.3 (C-6). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [20, 21]. Compound9 was identified as 1,3-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid.


## 3.1.10. 1,4-Di-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (10)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 539 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.50 (2H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-7′, 7′′), 7.02 (2H, m, H-2′, 2′′), 6.95 (2H, m, H-6′, 6′′), 6.75 (2H, m, H-5′, H-5′′), 6.24 (2H, d,J = 15.6 Hz, H-8′, 8′′), 5.55 (1H, br s, H-3), 4.98 (1H, br s, H-4), 4.24 (1H, br s, H-5), 2.15 (3H, m, H-6a, 6b, 2a), 1.87 (1H, br s, H-2b); 3C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 177.6 (C-7), 166.8 (C-9′′), 166.6 (C-9′), 149.2 (C-4′′), 149.2 (C-4′), 146.2 (C-3′′), 146.2 (C-3′), 146.1 (C-7′′), 146.1 (C-7′), 126.1 (C-1′′), 125.8 (C-1′), 122.0 (C-6′′), 122.0 (C-6′), 116.4 (C-5′′), 116.4 (C-5′), 115.4 (C-2′′), 115.4 (C-2′), 114.2 (C-8′′), 114.2 (C-8′), 76.8 (C-1), 76.1 (C-4), 68.4 (C-3), 69.1 (C-5), 40.2 (C-2), 38.3 (C-6). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [20, 23]. Compound10 was identified as 1,4-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid.


## 3.1.11. 1,5-Di-O-Caffeoylquinic Acid (11)

Yellow amorphous powder; ESI-MS (m/z) 539 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 7.50 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7′′), 7.38 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7′), 7.03 (2H, br s, H-2′, 2′′), 6.94 (2H, t,J = 8.0 Hz, H-6′, 6′′), 6.73 (2H, t,J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′, H-5′′), 6.23 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8′′), 6.20 (1H, d,J = 16.4 Hz, H-8′), 5.18 (1H, d,J = 10.8 Hz, H-5), 3.68 (1H, br s, H-3), 3.65 (1H, br s, H-4), 2.25 (1H, t,J = 12.0 Hz, H-6a), 1.98 (3H, m, H-2a, 2b, 6b); 3C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 174.2 (C-7), 166.4 (C-9′′), 165.7 (C-9′), 148.9 (C-4′′), 148.6 (C-4′), 146.3 (C-3′′), 146.2 (C-3′), 145.3 (C-7′′), 144.3 (C-7′), 126.3 (C-1′′), 126.1 (C-1′), 121.6 (C-6′′), 121.0 (C-6′), 116.3 (C-5′′), 116.3 (C-5′), 115.5 (C-2′′), 115.4 (C-2′), 115.1 (C-8′′), 116.2 (C-8′), 83.1 (C-1), 71.4 (C-4), 69.3 (C-3), 70.1 (C-5), 40.0 (C-2), 34.0 (C-6). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [20, 21]. Compound11 was identified as 1,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid.


## 3.1.12. (+)-Threo-(7R,8R)-Guaiacylglycerol-β-Coniferyl Aldehyde Ether (12)

White gum;α
D
20 +51.3 (c 0.33, MeOH); ESI-MS (m/z) 397 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 9.59 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-9′, -CHO), 7.58 (1H, d,J= 15.6 Hz, H-7′), 6.67 (1H, dd,J= 15.6, 8.0 Hz, H-8′), 7.17 (1H, dd,J= 8.8, 2.0 Hz, H-6′), 6.85 (1H, dd,J= 8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.99 (1H, d,J= 8.8 Hz, H-5′), 6.70 (1H, d,J= 8.0 Hz, H-5), 7.22 (1H, d,J= 2.0 Hz, H-2′), 7.03 (1H, d,J= 2.0 Hz, H-2), 4.55 (1H, m, H-8), 4.82 (1H, d,J= 6.0 Hz, H-7), 3.84 (2H, d,J= 4.8 Hz, H-9), 3.82 (3H, s, C-3′ -OCH3), 3.79 (3H, s, C-3 -OCH3); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 194.76 (C-9′, -CHO), 154.16 (C-7′), 151.35 (C-4′), 150.38 (C-3′), 147.38 (C-3), 145.79 (C-4), 132.64 (C-1), 127.96 (C-1′), 126.34 (C-8′), 123.06 (C-6′), 119.84 (C-6), 115.87 (C-5′), 114.27 (C-5), 111.36 (C-2′), 110.70 (C-2), 84.09 (C-8), 72.76 (C-7), 61.13 (C-9), 55.27 (C-3′ -OCH3), 55.00 (C-3 -OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [24]. Compound12 was identified as (+)-threo-(7R,8R)-guaiacylglycerol-β-coniferyl aldehyde ether.


## 3.1.13. (+)-Erythro-(7S,8R)-Guaiacylglycerol-β-Coniferyl Aldehyde Ether (13)

White gum;α
D
20 +148.9 (c 0.12, MeOH); ESI-MS (m/z) 397 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 9.60 (1H, d,J = 8.0 Hz, H-9′, -CHO), 7.61 (1H, d,J= 16.0 Hz, H-7′), 6.68 (1H, dd,J= 16.0, 8.0 Hz, H-8′), 7.21 (1H, dd,J= 8.4, 2.0 Hz, H-6′), 6.86 (1H, dd,J= 8.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 7.09 (1H, d,J= 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.75 (1H, d,J= 8.4 Hz, H-5), 7.29 (1H, d,J= 2.0 Hz, H-2′), 7.03 (1H, d,J= 2.0 Hz, H-2), 4.52 (1H, m, H-8), 4.88 (1H, overlapped, H-7), 3.78 (1H, m, H-9a), 3.55 (1H, m, H-9b), 3.91 (3H, s, C-3′ -OCH3), 3.81 (3H, s, C-3 -OCH3); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 194.76 (C-9′, -CHO), 154.11 (C-7′), 151.66 (C-4′), 150.42 (C-3′), 147.56 (C-3), 145.89 (C-4), 132.29 (C-1), 128.07 (C-1′), 126.42 (C-8′), 123.22 (C-6′), 119.32 (C-6), 115.83 (C-5′), 114.51 (C-5), 111.36 (C-2′), 110.37 (C-2), 84.73 (C-8), 72.55 (C-7), 60.75 (C-9), 55.32 (C-3′ -OCH3), 55.00 (C-3 -OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [24]. Compound13 was identified as (+)-erythro-(7S,8R)-guaiacylglycerol-β-coniferyl aldehyde ether.


## 3.1.14. Ferulic Acid (14)

Colorless needles (MeOH); ESI-MS (m/z) 217 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz)δ: 7.60 (1H, d,J = 15.9 Hz, H-7), 7.17 (1H, d,J = 2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.06 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.81 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-5), 6.32 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8), 3.88 (3H, s, -OCH3); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz)δ: 169.8 (C-9, -COOH), 149.2 (C-4), 148.0 (C-3), 145.5 (C-7), 126.5 (C-1), 122.6 (C-6), 115.1 (C-8), 114.8 (C-5), 110.4 (C-2), 55.1 (-OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [25]. Compound14 was identified as ferulic acid.


## 3.1.15. Caffeic Acid (15)

Colorless needles (MeOH); ESI-MS (m/z) 203 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz)δ: 7.58 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7), 7.17 (1H, d,J = 2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.00 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.88 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-5), 6.33 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-8); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz)δ: 166.9 (C-9, -COOH), 149.1 (C-4), 146.4 (C-3), 145.3 (C-7), 126.3 (C-1), 121.8 (C-6), 116.4 (C-5), 115.3 (C-8), 115.2 (C-2). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [26]. Compound15 was identified as caffeic acid.


## 3.1.16. Stigmasterol (16)

Colorless needles (MeOH);1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 5.32 (1H, br s, H-6), 5.15 (1H, dd,J = 15.2, 8.4 Hz, H-22), 5.01 (1H, dd,J = 15.2, 8.4 Hz, H-23), 3.52 (1H, m, H-3α), 0.97 (3H, s, H-19), 0.89 (3H, d,J = 6.4 Hz, H-21), 0.82 (3H, d,J = 6.4 Hz, H-26), 0.83 (3H, t,J = 7.6 Hz, H-29), 0.77 (3H, d,J = 6.0 Hz, H-27), 0.65 (3H, s, H-18); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 140.9 (C-5), 138.4 (C-22), 129.4 (C-23), 121.8 (C-6), 71.9 (C-3), 57.0 (C-14), 56.1 (C-17), 51.3 (C-24), 50.2 (C-9), 42.4 (C-4), 42.3 (C-13), 40.6 (C-20), 39.8 (C-12), 37.4 (C-1), 36.6 (C-10), 32.0 (C-7), 32.0 (C-8), 32.0 (C-25), 31.7 (C-2), 29.0 (C-16), 25.5 (C-28), 24.4 (C-15), 21.3 (C-11), 21.2 (C-21), 19.5 (C-26), 19.1 (C-19), 19.1 (C-27), 12.3 (C-29), 12.1 (C-18). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [27]. Compound16 was identified as stigmasterol.


## 3.1.17.β-Sitosterol (17)

Colorless needles (MeOH);1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz),δ: 5.31 (1H, br s, H-6), 3.52 (1H, m, H-3α), 0.99 (3H, d,J = 6.8 Hz, H-21), 0.97 (3H, s, H-19), 0.82 (3H, d,J = 6.4 Hz, H-26), 0.79 (3H, t,J = 7.2 Hz, H-29), 0.77 (3H, d,J = 6.0 Hz, H-27), 0.66 (3H, s, H-18); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 140.9 (C-5), 121.8 (C-6), 71.9 (C-3), 56.9 (C-14), 56.2 (C-17), 50.2 (C-9), 45.9 (C-24), 42.4 (C-4), 42.4 (C-13), 39.9 (C-12), 37.4 (C-1), 36.6 (C-10), 36.2 (C-20), 34.0 (C-22), 32.0 (C-7), 32.0 (C-8), 31.7 (C-2), 29.3 (C-25), 28.3 (C-16), 26.2 (C-23), 24.4 (C-15), 23.2 (C-28), 21.2 (C-11), 19.9 (C-27), 19.5 (C-19), 19.1 (C-21), 18.9 (C-26), 12.1 (C-29), 11.9 (C-18). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [27]. Compound17 was identified as β-sitosterol.


## 3.1.18. Adenosine (18)

Colorless sand crystal (MeOH), ESI-MS (m/z) 290 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 400 MHz) δ: 8.35 (1H, s, H-2), 8.14 (1H, s, H-4), 7.36 (2H, s, -NH2), 5.89 (1H, d,J = 6.4 Hz, H-1′), 5.46 (1H, d,J = 6.0 Hz, 2′-OH), 5.42 (1H, m, 5′-OH), 5.20 (1H, d,J = 4.8 Hz, 3′-OH), 4.62 (1H, q,J = 6.0 Hz, H-2′), 4.17 (1H, m, H-3′), 3.98 (1H, m, H-4′), 3.69 (1H, m, H-5′a), 3.57 (1H, m, H-5′b); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d
6, 100 MHz) δ: 156.7 (C-1), 152.9 (C-2), 149.6 (C-3), 140.5 (C-4), 119.9 (C-5), 88.5 (C-1′), 86.5 (C-4′), 74.0 (C-2′), 71.2 (C-3′), 62.3 (C-5′). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [28]. Compound18 was identified as adenosine.


## 3.1.19. Syringin (19)

Colorless needles (MeOH), ESI-MS (m/z) 395 [M + Na]+;1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 6.74 (2H, s, H-3, 5), 6.56 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7), 6.34 (1H, dt,J = 16.0, 5.6 Hz, H-8), 4.87 (1H, overlapped, H-1′), 4.22 (2H, dd,J = 5.6, 1.2 Hz, H-9), 3.85 (6H, s, 2OCH3), 3.79 (1H, dd,J = 12.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6′a), 3.68 (1H, dd,J = 12.0, 4.8 Hz, H-6′b), 3.50-3.38 (3H, m, H-3′, 4′, 5′), 3.22 (1H, m, H-2′); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 153.0 (C-6), 153.0 (C-2), 134.6 (C-4), 133.9 (C-1), 130.0 (C-7), 128.7 (C-8), 104.1 (C-3), 104.1 (C-5), 104.0 (C-1′), 77.0 (C-5′), 76.5 (C-3′), 74.4 (C-2′), 70.0 (C-4′), 62.3 (C-9), 61.3 (C-6′), 55.7 (2OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [29, 30]. Compound19 was identified as syringin.


## 3.1.20. Trans-Coniferin (20)

White powder, ESI-MS (m/z) 365 [M + Na]+; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 7.10 (1H, d,J = 8.4 Hz, H-5), 7.05 (1H, d,J = 1.6 Hz, H-2), 6.95 (1H, dd,J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz, H-6), 6.55 (1H, d,J = 16.0 Hz, H-7), 6.30 (1H, dt,J = 16.0, 5.6 Hz, H-8), 4.89 (1H, d,J = 7.2 Hz, H-1′), 4.21 (2H, d,J = 5.2 Hz, H-9), 3.86 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.84 (1H, m, H-6′a), 3.71 (1H, dd,J = 12.0, 4.8 Hz, H-6′b), 3.50 (2H, m, H-4′, 5′), 3.41 (2H, m, H-2′, 3′); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) δ: 149.6 (C-3), 146.3 (C-4), 132.3 (C-1), 130.0 (C-7), 127.6 (C-8), 119.4 (C-6), 116.6 (C-5), 110.0 (C-2), 101.4 (C-1′), 76.9 (C-5′), 76.5 (C-3′), 73.6 (C-2′), 70.0 (C-4′), 62.4 (C-9), 61.2 (C-6′), 55.4 (OCH3). All spectral data agreed with those previously reported [30]. Compound20 was identified astrans-coniferin.The chemical structures of compounds1–20 are shown in Figure 1.Figure 1
The chemical structures of compounds1-20.


## 3.2. Effects of Compounds on NO and PGE2 Production in LPS-Induced BV2 Microglial Cells

Among the isolated compounds fromA. henryi, we selected 13 compounds (compounds1–3,5,7,9,10,11,14,15, and18–20) based on their number of publications, and these compounds were screened for anti-inflammatory effects, including the inhibition of NO and PGE2 production, in LPS-stimulated BV2 microglial cells. BV2 cells were pretreated with the compounds for 3 h and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. The concentration required to inhibit the production of NO by 50% (IC50 value) was calculated based on the concentrations of NO and PGE2 released into the culture media as measured by the Griess method and PGE2 ELISA kit, respectively. Among the tested compounds, only compound3 showed inhibitory effects against LPS-induced NO production with an IC50 value of 2.22 ± 0.11 μM and LPS-induced PGE2 production with an IC50 value of 2.28 ± 0.23 μM. The IC50 values of butein, a positive control, were 4.41 ± 0.45 μM in NO production and 3.26 ± 0.53 μM in PGE2 production, respectively. At tested concentrations, all test compounds did not show cytotoxic effects to BV2 cells (data not shown). Therefore, compound3 was further investigated to elucidate the up-stream signaling pathways of its antineuroinflammatory effect.


## 3.3. Effect of Compound3 on LPS-Induced Expression of iNOS and COX-2 Protein in BV2 Microglial Cells

Inhibition of iNOS and COX-2 protein expression could be an important strategy to prevent neuroinflammation. In the present study, it was investigated whether compound3 inhibits LPS-induced overexpression of iNOS and COX-2 protein in BV2 cells. BV2 cells were pretreated with compound3 for 3 h and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. As a result, LPS augmented the expression of iNOS and COX-2 proteins; however, pretreatment with compound3reversed these responses (Figure 2).Figure 2
The effect of compound3 on LPS-induced iNOS and COX-2 protein expression in BV2 microglial cells. Cells were pretreated with/without the indicated concentrations of compound3 for 3 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. The levels of iNOS and COX-2 were determined by Western blot analysis. The experiment was repeated three times, and similar results were obtained.
(a)
(b)


## 3.4. Effect of Compound3 on LPS-Induced Up-Regulation of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines

To investigate whether compound3 inhibits the production of LPS-induced proinflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, BV2 cells were pretreated with compound3 for 3 h and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. Pretreatment with compound3 attenuated the LPS-induced production of IL-1β and TNF-α, but it had little effect on IL-6 production (Figures 3(a)–3(c)). Subsequently, to elucidate how compound3 inhibits proinflammatory cytokine production, the mRNA levels of the cytokines were examined. BV2 cells were pretreated with compound3 for 3 h and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 6 h. Consistent with the results obtained from the cytokine production data, pretreatment with compound3 reduced the LPS-induced mRNA levels of IL-1β and TNF-α, but it did not affect to mRNA level of IL-6 (Figures 3(d)–3(f)). These results suggested that compound3 exhibits the antineuroinflammatory effects by negatively regulating the production of IL-1β and TNF-α at the transcriptional level in LPS-challenged BV2 microglial cells.Figure 3
Effects of compound3 on LPS-induced production and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and their mRNA, IL-1β (a, d), IL-6 (b, e), and TNF-α (c, f) in BV2 microglial cells. Cells were pretreated with/without the indicated concentrations of compound3 for 3 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h and 6 h, respectively. The concentrations of cytokines were measured by ELISA, and the mRNA levels of the proinflammatory cytokines were analyzed by qRT-PCR. p
∗ < 0.05, p
∗
∗ < 0.01, and p
∗
∗
∗ < 0.001 in comparison with LPS-treated group.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


## 3.5. Effect of Compound3 on LPS-Induced Activation of MAPK Pathway in BV2 Cells

We examined whether the antineuroinflammatory effects of compound3 contribute to the inactivation of MAPK in the present study. BV2 cells were pretreated with compound3 for 3 h and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 30 min. LPS markedly increased the phosphorylation of p38, JNK, and ERK. Pretreatment with compound3 inhibited the phosphorylation of p38 (Figure 4(a)), but it had no effect on the phosphorylation of JNK and ERK (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)).Figure 4
Effects of compound3 on the LPS-induced activation of MAPK pathways in BV2 microglial cells. Lysates were prepared from cells pretreated with/without the indicated concentrations of compound3 for 3 h and then with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 30 min. The levels of p-p38, p38, p-ERK, ERK, p-JNK, and JNK were determined by Western blot analysis. Actin was used as a loading control. The experiment was repeated three times, and similar results were obtained.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 4. Discussion

The present study demonstrated that compound3 (savinin), one of the isolated compounds from the roots ofA. henryi exerted antineuroinflammatory effects in LPS-treated microglial cells. Compound3 inhibited LPS-induced the release of proinflammatory mediators, including NO, PGE2, iNOS, COX-2, IL-1β, and TNF-α. These inhibitory effects of compound3 were mediated by the inactivation of the p38 MAPK pathway.NO and PGE2, as well as their regulatory enzymes iNOS and COX-2, are important mediators for neuroinflammation. They are involved in the pathogenesis of various neuroinflammatory pathophysiological conditions [31]. In addition, proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, are important factors in CNS immune responses, and mediate neurodegeneration [3]. Microglial cells are activated by various stimuli. The activation of these cells leads to the release of these proinflammatory mediators and the exacerbation of neuroinflammation and neuroglia-induced neurotoxicity [31, 32]. Our investigation showed that compound3,isolated fromA. henryi, suppressed NO and PGE2 production in LPS-stimulated BV2 microglial cells and also inhibited the LPS-induced expression of the iNOS and COX-2 protein (Figure 2). Additionally, the present data indicated that compound3 significantly suppressed the release of IL-1β and TNF-α, but not IL-6, at the protein and mRNA levels (Figure 3).MAPKs are a family of serine/threonine protein kinases, and they consist of three major subunits: p38, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). MAPKs are involved in various cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, stress responses, and immune responses [33]. In inflammatory responses, the activation of MAPKs leads to release of inflammatory-related factors, such as iNOS, COX-2, ILs, and TNF-α [34]. Therefore, we further investigated whether the antineuroinflammatory effects of compound3 in LPS-stimulated BV2 microglial cells were related to the inactivation of MAPKs. Our results showed that compound3 significantly inhibited the phosphorylation of p38 MAPK, but it did not affect the phosphorylation of ERK and JNK MAPKs.Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) is one of the major transcription factors regulating inflammatory responses. When microglial cells are stimulated with ILs, TNF-α, interferons, or LPS, NF-κB can be activated following increased translocation of p65 and p50, which are subunits of the NF-κB dimer, into the nucleus, as well as the phosphorylation and degradation of inhibitor of kappa B (IκB)-α in the cytosol [35]. This response upregulates the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules in microglial cells [1]. Therefore, NF-κB can be an important target for the treatment of neuroinflammation-related neurodegenerative diseases. Interestingly, pretreatment with compound3 did not decrease the nuclear translocation of p65 and p50 or the phosphorylation and degradation of IκB-α (data not shown). Considering the effect of compound3 on the LPS-induced activation of NF-κB and MAPK pathways, it is suggested that compound3 exerted antineuroinflammatory effects by specifically inactivating the p38 MAPK pathway.Various pharmacological activities of lignans, including compound3 (savinin), have been reported. These activities include cytotoxic effects against human cancer cell lines [36], CYP3A4 inactivation [37], antisevere acute respiratory syndrome associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) activity [38], inhibition of PGE2 production in rat peritoneal macrophages [39], antiestrogenic [40], insecticidal [41], and inhibition of TNF-α production in RAW264.7 macrophage cells [42]; however, this is the first finding on the antineuroinflammatory effects of compound3 (savinin) to the best of our knowledge.


## 5. Conclusions

In summary, 20 secondary metabolites were isolated from the EtOAc-, butanol-, and PE-soluble fractions of the methanol extract ofAcanthopanax henryi roots. Among these compounds, savinin (compound3) was the only compound which inhibited the production of NO and PGE2, and the expression of iNOS and COX-2 proteins in LPS-stimulated BV2 microglial cells. In addition, this compound significantly suppressed the release of IL-1β and TNF-α at the protein and mRNA levels. These inhibitory effects of compound3 were mediated by p38 MAPK, but not ERK and JNK MAPKs. Taken together, our investigation showed that compound3 can be a promising candidate for the development of treatment options for neurodegenerative diseases. Further studies elucidating the detailed mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory effects of compound3 are suggested.



---

*Source: 1856294-2019-02-21.xml*