# Formulation and Pharmaceutical Assessment ofAnnona muricata Oral Capsules and Suspension as Antidiarrhea Dosage Forms

Authors: Frederick William Akuffo Owusu; Mariam El Boakye-Gyasi; Philomena Entsie; Christina Osei-Asare; Ofosua Adi-Dako; Grace Boakye Bosuthe; Esther Antwi-Mensah; Marcel Tunkumgnen Bayor
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Annona muricata (Annonaceae) is a tropical plant widely known for its edible fruits. Recent scientific studies have confirmed the folkloric use of its seeds as an antidiarrheal agent. This study sought to formulate capsules and suspensions using the ethanolic extract from Annona muricata seeds. The dried ethanolic extract was formulated into granules and subsequently encapsulated. The suspension formulated was assessed for sedimentation rate, sedimentation volume, viscosity, dissolution, drug content, and flow rate, while pharmacopeia tests such as disintegration, dissolution, uniformity of weight, and drug content were carried out on the formulated capsules. The formulated suspension passed the drug content and in vitro release studies. Annona muricata suspension exhibited pseudoplastic flow with good sedimentation rate and sedimentation volume. The formulated capsules passed the in vitro dissolution studies, weight uniformity, disintegration, and drug content tests. The ethanolic extract of Annona muricata seeds was appropriately formulated into standardized solid and liquid oral dosage forms.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Diarrhea is a condition of having unusual loose or watery stools with a sense of urgency. It is also known to occur when the lining of the intestine is unable to retain fluid, leading to lose stool. The precarious nature of the disease is linked with dehydration due to fluid loss and consistently high morbidity in the absence of vigorous interventions. Diarrhea is a leading cause of death in all age groups with an estimated 1.31 million deaths recorded annually across the globe for a mortality rate of 7.58% [1, 2]. The burden of deaths is greatest in low-income countries such as Ghana where getting access to portable water and proper sanitation is a problem. In Ghana, the mortality rate as at 2020 was 7.15% per 1000 inhabitants with diarrhea accounting for about 25% of death in children under five years with correspondingly high debilitating effects in adults [1–4].Most patients with diarrhea do not seek medical attention unless symptoms last for more than three days or they have coexisting fever, prostration, or rectal bleeding by which time their condition may have worsened. Hence, it is very imperative that medications used in the treatment of diarrhea are effective and readily available [1, 3]. In order to treat diarrhea, various orthodox medicines have been developed. However, the World Health Organization promotes studies on medicinal plants that can be used to manage and treat diarrhea and to formulate these medicinal plant extracts in standardized dosage forms that will be convenient, efficient, and safe for the patient. In Ghana, traditionally, a lot of plants are used to treat diarrhea including Bridelia ferruginea, Albizia ferruginea, and Psidium guajava (guava). Another plant commonly used to treat diarrhea in Ghana is Annona muricata [5–7].Annona muricata of the family Annonaceae, popularly known as soursop, graviola, or guanabana is a fruit that grows in the tropical regions of America, Africa, and the Caribbean. Phytochemical studies carried out on various parts of the plant revealed the presence of tannins, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and alkaloids which underpin their pharmacological relevance [6, 8]. Further research carried out by Doe et al. shows that the ethanolic extract of the seeds have antidiarrheal property and corroborates its folkloric use [9]. Irrespective of the reported dose and pharmacological activity of the ethanolic extract of the seeds of Annona muricata in the management of diarrhea, its use is limited in clinical settings due to the absence of standardized dosage forms. Against this background, this study seeks to provide standardized dosage forms (suspensions and capsules) of the ethanolic extract of the seeds of Annona muricata in order to substantiate its clinical usefulness and integration into current health care delivery as an effective antidiarrheal agent.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Annona muricata fruits (Ashaiman, Ghana), maize starch (Anhui Sunhere Pharmaceuticals, China), acacia and tragacanth powder (Sigma Aldrich), benzoic acid, and laboratory grades of concentrated hydrochloric acid and ethanol (Department of Pharmaceutics, KNUST, Ghana) were obtained.


### 2.2. Methods

#### 2.2.1. Collection of Sample and Extractive Procedure

Annona muricata fruits were obtained from the Ashaiman market, in the Greater Accra region of Ghana, and authenticated at the Department of Pharmacognosy, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana. Extraction was done using a previously established method [9]. The seeds were removed from the fruits. It was then dried under shade for 7 days, and the weight was taken afterwards. The dried seeds were milled into fine powder and weighed as well. The milled seeds were then macerated in 80% ethanol in an airtight container and stored in the refrigerator at 5°C for 7 days. The decanted solution was filtered using a filter paper, and the filtrate was evaporated using a rotary evaporator and then freeze dried into fine powder.


#### 2.2.2. Assessment of the Flow Characteristics

The indirect method described by Aulton and Taylor [10] in the characterization of the flow properties of materials was used.


### 2.3. Formulation ofAnnona muricata Suspension

In the formulation of 100 mL suspension,Annona muricata extract was weighed and added to the previously weighed Acacia and triturated with benzoic acid and double strength chloroform water to obtain a uniform mixture (such that each 5 mL contains 0.15 g). Water was then used to top up to the mark (Table 1). The excipients were selected after several preformulation studies with different excipients.Table 1
Formula for preparingAnnona muricata suspension.
IngredientQuantityAnnona muricata extract3 gAcacia powder3 gBenzoic acid0.1 gDouble strength chloroform water50 mLWater100 mL


### 2.4. Formulation ofAnnona muricata Granules

In preparing the granules, starch, lactose, andAnnona muricata extract were weighed and mixed using geometric dilution (Table 2). The powdered mixture was then blended with tragacanth mucilage to form a damp mass and prepared into granules (14.8 g) using the method described by [10]. The excipients were selected after several preformulation studies with different excipients.Table 2
Formula for preparingAnnona muricata capsules.
IngredientQuantity (g)Annona muricata extract10Starch3.2Lactose0.5Tragacanth mucilage (10 %w/v)0.7


### 2.5. Evaluation of Flow Properties ofAnnona muricata Granules

The flow properties of the formulated granules were determined using the fixed height method for angle of repose and bulk density measurements (Hausner ratio and Carr’s index) [10].


### 2.6. Encapsulation ofAnnona muricata Granules

The granules were encapsulated using capsule size 1 with 0.15 g of extract in each capsule (150 mg per dose). Fifty-five (55) capsules were filled simultaneously.


### 2.7. Quality Assessment of Formulated Capsules

The weight uniformity and disintegration tests were determined as described by the British and International Pharmacopeias [11, 12].


#### 2.7.1. Drug Content

Ten capsules were used for this experiment. A capsule was emptied, and 20 mL of 0.1 M HCl was added. The mixture was filtered, and 0.1 M HCl was used to top it up to 50 ml. Drawell’s UV spectrometer was used in measuring the absorbances at 300 nm after serially diluting the solutions. The recorded absorbance was then inserted into a calibration equation, and the percentage content was determined for each capsule [11, 13–15].


#### 2.7.2. In Vitro Dissolution Test

In vitro dissolution study was done using the USP type I basket dissolution apparatus. 900 mL of 0.1 M HCl was transferred into each of the six dissolution vessels, the temperature of the dissolution vessel was maintained at 37 ± 2°C, and a randomly selected capsule was dropped into the dissolution medium. An aliquot of the sample was withdrawn at regular time intervals (5, 15, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 60 minutes), and the same volume of 0.1 M HCl was used to replace the volume withdrawn. The samples were filtered and analyzed with the UV spectrometer at 300 nm. The absorbances obtained were inserted into the calibration equation to obtain the amount of drug released at each time point. A graph of cumulative drug released against time was then plotted to obtain the dissolution profile of the formulated capsules in 0.1 M HCl [11, 13–15].


### 2.8. Quality Assessment ofAnnona muricata Suspension

The appearance, pH, rheology, apparent viscosity, drug content, in vitro dissolution studies, sedimentation volume, and sedimentation rate were determined using previously described methods [11, 16–18].


#### 2.8.1. Uniformity in Drug Content of FormulatedAnnona muricata Suspension

Five (5) mL of the formulated suspension was diluted with 25 mL of 0.1 M HCl, filtered, and topped up to 50 mL using the same solvent (0.1 M HCl). Drawell’s UV spectrometer was used in measuring the absorbances at 300 nm. The recorded absorbance was then inserted into the calibration equation, and the percentage content was determined. This was repeated for nine other 5 mL aliquots [11, 16–18].


#### 2.8.2. In Vitro Dissolution Study ofAnnona muricata Suspension

The USP type II paddle dissolution apparatus was used with 900 mL of 0.1 M HCl (as the dissolution medium) heated to 37° ± 2°C. The paddles were set to a speed of 50 rpm, and 5 ml of the prepared suspension was transferred into the dissolution medium. After 5, 15, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 60 minutes, an amount of 10 mL of the dissolution medium was withdrawn, filtered, and the absorbance at 300 nm was determined using Drawell’s UV spectrometer. The withdrawn volume was replaced with same volume of 0.1 M HCl to maintain sink conditions. The absorbances obtained were inserted into the previously determined calibration equation to obtain the amount of drug released at each time point. A graph of cumulative drug released against time was then plotted to obtain the dissolution profile of the formulated suspension in 0.1 M HCl [11, 16–18].


## 2.1. Materials

Annona muricata fruits (Ashaiman, Ghana), maize starch (Anhui Sunhere Pharmaceuticals, China), acacia and tragacanth powder (Sigma Aldrich), benzoic acid, and laboratory grades of concentrated hydrochloric acid and ethanol (Department of Pharmaceutics, KNUST, Ghana) were obtained.


## 2.2. Methods

### 2.2.1. Collection of Sample and Extractive Procedure

Annona muricata fruits were obtained from the Ashaiman market, in the Greater Accra region of Ghana, and authenticated at the Department of Pharmacognosy, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana. Extraction was done using a previously established method [9]. The seeds were removed from the fruits. It was then dried under shade for 7 days, and the weight was taken afterwards. The dried seeds were milled into fine powder and weighed as well. The milled seeds were then macerated in 80% ethanol in an airtight container and stored in the refrigerator at 5°C for 7 days. The decanted solution was filtered using a filter paper, and the filtrate was evaporated using a rotary evaporator and then freeze dried into fine powder.


### 2.2.2. Assessment of the Flow Characteristics

The indirect method described by Aulton and Taylor [10] in the characterization of the flow properties of materials was used.


## 2.2.1. Collection of Sample and Extractive Procedure

Annona muricata fruits were obtained from the Ashaiman market, in the Greater Accra region of Ghana, and authenticated at the Department of Pharmacognosy, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana. Extraction was done using a previously established method [9]. The seeds were removed from the fruits. It was then dried under shade for 7 days, and the weight was taken afterwards. The dried seeds were milled into fine powder and weighed as well. The milled seeds were then macerated in 80% ethanol in an airtight container and stored in the refrigerator at 5°C for 7 days. The decanted solution was filtered using a filter paper, and the filtrate was evaporated using a rotary evaporator and then freeze dried into fine powder.


## 2.2.2. Assessment of the Flow Characteristics

The indirect method described by Aulton and Taylor [10] in the characterization of the flow properties of materials was used.


## 2.3. Formulation ofAnnona muricata Suspension

In the formulation of 100 mL suspension,Annona muricata extract was weighed and added to the previously weighed Acacia and triturated with benzoic acid and double strength chloroform water to obtain a uniform mixture (such that each 5 mL contains 0.15 g). Water was then used to top up to the mark (Table 1). The excipients were selected after several preformulation studies with different excipients.Table 1
Formula for preparingAnnona muricata suspension.
IngredientQuantityAnnona muricata extract3 gAcacia powder3 gBenzoic acid0.1 gDouble strength chloroform water50 mLWater100 mL


## 2.4. Formulation ofAnnona muricata Granules

In preparing the granules, starch, lactose, andAnnona muricata extract were weighed and mixed using geometric dilution (Table 2). The powdered mixture was then blended with tragacanth mucilage to form a damp mass and prepared into granules (14.8 g) using the method described by [10]. The excipients were selected after several preformulation studies with different excipients.Table 2
Formula for preparingAnnona muricata capsules.
IngredientQuantity (g)Annona muricata extract10Starch3.2Lactose0.5Tragacanth mucilage (10 %w/v)0.7


## 2.5. Evaluation of Flow Properties ofAnnona muricata Granules

The flow properties of the formulated granules were determined using the fixed height method for angle of repose and bulk density measurements (Hausner ratio and Carr’s index) [10].


## 2.6. Encapsulation ofAnnona muricata Granules

The granules were encapsulated using capsule size 1 with 0.15 g of extract in each capsule (150 mg per dose). Fifty-five (55) capsules were filled simultaneously.


## 2.7. Quality Assessment of Formulated Capsules

The weight uniformity and disintegration tests were determined as described by the British and International Pharmacopeias [11, 12].


### 2.7.1. Drug Content

Ten capsules were used for this experiment. A capsule was emptied, and 20 mL of 0.1 M HCl was added. The mixture was filtered, and 0.1 M HCl was used to top it up to 50 ml. Drawell’s UV spectrometer was used in measuring the absorbances at 300 nm after serially diluting the solutions. The recorded absorbance was then inserted into a calibration equation, and the percentage content was determined for each capsule [11, 13–15].


### 2.7.2. In Vitro Dissolution Test

In vitro dissolution study was done using the USP type I basket dissolution apparatus. 900 mL of 0.1 M HCl was transferred into each of the six dissolution vessels, the temperature of the dissolution vessel was maintained at 37 ± 2°C, and a randomly selected capsule was dropped into the dissolution medium. An aliquot of the sample was withdrawn at regular time intervals (5, 15, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 60 minutes), and the same volume of 0.1 M HCl was used to replace the volume withdrawn. The samples were filtered and analyzed with the UV spectrometer at 300 nm. The absorbances obtained were inserted into the calibration equation to obtain the amount of drug released at each time point. A graph of cumulative drug released against time was then plotted to obtain the dissolution profile of the formulated capsules in 0.1 M HCl [11, 13–15].


## 2.7.1. Drug Content

Ten capsules were used for this experiment. A capsule was emptied, and 20 mL of 0.1 M HCl was added. The mixture was filtered, and 0.1 M HCl was used to top it up to 50 ml. Drawell’s UV spectrometer was used in measuring the absorbances at 300 nm after serially diluting the solutions. The recorded absorbance was then inserted into a calibration equation, and the percentage content was determined for each capsule [11, 13–15].


## 2.7.2. In Vitro Dissolution Test

In vitro dissolution study was done using the USP type I basket dissolution apparatus. 900 mL of 0.1 M HCl was transferred into each of the six dissolution vessels, the temperature of the dissolution vessel was maintained at 37 ± 2°C, and a randomly selected capsule was dropped into the dissolution medium. An aliquot of the sample was withdrawn at regular time intervals (5, 15, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 60 minutes), and the same volume of 0.1 M HCl was used to replace the volume withdrawn. The samples were filtered and analyzed with the UV spectrometer at 300 nm. The absorbances obtained were inserted into the calibration equation to obtain the amount of drug released at each time point. A graph of cumulative drug released against time was then plotted to obtain the dissolution profile of the formulated capsules in 0.1 M HCl [11, 13–15].


## 2.8. Quality Assessment ofAnnona muricata Suspension

The appearance, pH, rheology, apparent viscosity, drug content, in vitro dissolution studies, sedimentation volume, and sedimentation rate were determined using previously described methods [11, 16–18].


### 2.8.1. Uniformity in Drug Content of FormulatedAnnona muricata Suspension

Five (5) mL of the formulated suspension was diluted with 25 mL of 0.1 M HCl, filtered, and topped up to 50 mL using the same solvent (0.1 M HCl). Drawell’s UV spectrometer was used in measuring the absorbances at 300 nm. The recorded absorbance was then inserted into the calibration equation, and the percentage content was determined. This was repeated for nine other 5 mL aliquots [11, 16–18].


### 2.8.2. In Vitro Dissolution Study ofAnnona muricata Suspension

The USP type II paddle dissolution apparatus was used with 900 mL of 0.1 M HCl (as the dissolution medium) heated to 37° ± 2°C. The paddles were set to a speed of 50 rpm, and 5 ml of the prepared suspension was transferred into the dissolution medium. After 5, 15, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 60 minutes, an amount of 10 mL of the dissolution medium was withdrawn, filtered, and the absorbance at 300 nm was determined using Drawell’s UV spectrometer. The withdrawn volume was replaced with same volume of 0.1 M HCl to maintain sink conditions. The absorbances obtained were inserted into the previously determined calibration equation to obtain the amount of drug released at each time point. A graph of cumulative drug released against time was then plotted to obtain the dissolution profile of the formulated suspension in 0.1 M HCl [11, 16–18].


## 2.8.1. Uniformity in Drug Content of FormulatedAnnona muricata Suspension

Five (5) mL of the formulated suspension was diluted with 25 mL of 0.1 M HCl, filtered, and topped up to 50 mL using the same solvent (0.1 M HCl). Drawell’s UV spectrometer was used in measuring the absorbances at 300 nm. The recorded absorbance was then inserted into the calibration equation, and the percentage content was determined. This was repeated for nine other 5 mL aliquots [11, 16–18].


## 2.8.2. In Vitro Dissolution Study ofAnnona muricata Suspension

The USP type II paddle dissolution apparatus was used with 900 mL of 0.1 M HCl (as the dissolution medium) heated to 37° ± 2°C. The paddles were set to a speed of 50 rpm, and 5 ml of the prepared suspension was transferred into the dissolution medium. After 5, 15, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 60 minutes, an amount of 10 mL of the dissolution medium was withdrawn, filtered, and the absorbance at 300 nm was determined using Drawell’s UV spectrometer. The withdrawn volume was replaced with same volume of 0.1 M HCl to maintain sink conditions. The absorbances obtained were inserted into the previously determined calibration equation to obtain the amount of drug released at each time point. A graph of cumulative drug released against time was then plotted to obtain the dissolution profile of the formulated suspension in 0.1 M HCl [11, 16–18].


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Flow Characteristics of Granules and Extract

The powdered extract showed good flow properties with Hausnerʼs ratios of 1.12, Carr’s index of 10.98%, and angle of repose of 20.5°, while theAnnona muricata granules exhibited excellent flow properties with Hausnerʼs ratios of 1.10, Carr’s index of 8.93%, and angle of repose of 17.5°. This confirms that the formulated granules will improve the encapsulation process by enhancing the uniform filling of the capsule shells [11, 13].


### 3.2. Assessment ofAnnona muricata Capsules

#### 3.2.1. Capsule Weight Uniformity

The weight uniformity ofAnnona muricata capsules as given in Table 3 complied with the weight uniformity specifications according to the International Pharmacopeia [12]. This implies that each manufactured capsule potentially has the exact amount of the Annona muricata extract and excipients specified, with little variability, reducing the risk of under dosing and overdosing.Table 3
Weight uniformity of formulated capsules.
Quantity of capsules usedAverage weight (g)Quantity of capsules deviating by ±5%Quantity of capsules deviating by ±10%200.450NoneNone


#### 3.2.2. Disintegration Profile of Formulated Capsules

Based on the results given in Table4, the formulated capsules passed the disintegration test as stipulated by the British Pharmacopeia [11]. This indicates that the capsules will release their contents within time for further dissolution of the extract to occur.Table 4
Disintegration time of formulated capsules.
Disintegration test1st determination2nd determinationAverageTime (minutes)2.602.402.50 ± 0.14


#### 3.2.3. Drug Content

The percentage drug content of all ten sampled capsules were within the standard range of 85.0–115% (Table5) and confirms that the encapsulation process as well as other preencapsulation procedures were carried out accurately. The results also indicate that the formulated capsules will provide the required therapeutic dose without any overdose or underdosage that would be harmful or detrimental to the patient.Table 5
Assay of formulated capsules.
Capsule numberDrug content (%)199.32 ± 0.02291.86 ± 0.033101.53 ± 0.10495.59 ± 0.08599.32 ± 0.06695.59 ± 0.057101.53 ± 0.04891.86 ± 0.069101.53 ± 0.071099.32 ± 0.04


#### 3.2.4. In Vitro Dissolution ofAnnona muricata Extract from Capsules

According to the data (Figure1), 99.29% of the extract was released at the 45th minute. This implies that the capsules passed the dissolution test and can dissolve well in physiological solution, allowing the extract to be absorbed and the intended pharmacological activity to be achieved [11, 13].Figure 1
Release profile ofAnnona muricata extract from capsules.


### 3.3. Quality Assessment ofAnnona muricata Suspension

#### 3.3.1. Appearance Test

Over the course of four weeks, the formulated suspension was closely monitored for the appearance or absence of undesired physical changes. There were no unwanted physical changes in the prepared suspension (Table6). This shows that the suspension is physically stable and retains its aesthetic attractiveness and that the excipients employed in the formulation were appropriate [10, 19].Table 6
Physical stability of formulated suspension.
WeekPhysical instability (aggregation, caking, crystal growth formation)1No physical instability observed2No physical instability observed3No physical instability observed4No physical instability observed


#### 3.3.2. Sedimentation Volume and Rate of Formulated Suspension

A good suspension, in order to improve uniform and accurate dosing, should not have the suspended particles settling quickly. The sedimentation volume of an ideal suspension should be close to 1 with a correspondingly low sedimentation rate [19–21]. This property was evident in the formulated suspension (Figure 2).Figure 2
Effect of time on the sedimentation volume ofAnnona muricata suspension.


#### 3.3.3. Rheology, Redispersibility, and pH of Formulated Suspension

There was no statistical variation (P≥0.05) in the pH of the formulated suspension (Table 7) to indicate any physicochemical change [19, 22, 23]. The flow time of the suspension was short with a correspondingly high apparent viscosity for easy pourability (Table 7) [16, 19, 22]. Throughout the study period, the solid particles were redispersed with less than ten (10) strokes (Table 7). The prepared suspension possessed pseudoplastic flow, which implies that it may be swiftly redispersed with modest agitation, and the appropriate amount can be easily drawn (Figure 3). This feature is critical for a good suspension [24].Table 7
Physicochemical properties ofAnnona muricata suspension.
WeekpHFlow time (s)Apparent viscosity (η) (mL/s)Redispersibility (number of strokes)06.93 ± 0.012ns8.68 ± 0.581.153 ± 0.28716.94 ± 0.013ns8.67 ± 0.031.155 ± 0.19726.92 ± 0.010ns8.73 ± 0.501.147 ± 0.31936.93 ± 0.016ns8.64 ± 0.451.159 ± 0.37746.93 ± 0.014ns8.62 ± 0.251.161 ± 0.097Figure 3
Rheology of formulated suspension.


#### 3.3.4. Drug Content

All sampled doses passed the drug content test (Table8) [11]. This implies that each volume will have the exact amount of extract needed, preventing overdosing and underdosing, both of which are hazardous to the patient’s health.Table 8
Assay of formulated suspension.
Sampled dose numberAbsorbanceDrug content (%)10.4391.8620.4391.8630.46101.5340.4495.5950.4391.8660.4599.3270.46101.5380.46101.5390.4599.32100.4495.59


#### 3.3.5. In Vitro Dissolution Profile ofAnnona muricata Extract from Formulated Suspension

According to the data (Figure4), 99.20% of the extract was released at the 45th minute which complies with pharmacopeia specifications. This implies that the capsules can dissolve well in physiological solution, allowing the extract to be absorbed and eliciting the intended therapeutic effect [11, 22].Figure 4
Release profile ofAnnona muricata extract from suspension.


## 3.1. Flow Characteristics of Granules and Extract

The powdered extract showed good flow properties with Hausnerʼs ratios of 1.12, Carr’s index of 10.98%, and angle of repose of 20.5°, while theAnnona muricata granules exhibited excellent flow properties with Hausnerʼs ratios of 1.10, Carr’s index of 8.93%, and angle of repose of 17.5°. This confirms that the formulated granules will improve the encapsulation process by enhancing the uniform filling of the capsule shells [11, 13].


## 3.2. Assessment ofAnnona muricata Capsules

### 3.2.1. Capsule Weight Uniformity

The weight uniformity ofAnnona muricata capsules as given in Table 3 complied with the weight uniformity specifications according to the International Pharmacopeia [12]. This implies that each manufactured capsule potentially has the exact amount of the Annona muricata extract and excipients specified, with little variability, reducing the risk of under dosing and overdosing.Table 3
Weight uniformity of formulated capsules.
Quantity of capsules usedAverage weight (g)Quantity of capsules deviating by ±5%Quantity of capsules deviating by ±10%200.450NoneNone


### 3.2.2. Disintegration Profile of Formulated Capsules

Based on the results given in Table4, the formulated capsules passed the disintegration test as stipulated by the British Pharmacopeia [11]. This indicates that the capsules will release their contents within time for further dissolution of the extract to occur.Table 4
Disintegration time of formulated capsules.
Disintegration test1st determination2nd determinationAverageTime (minutes)2.602.402.50 ± 0.14


### 3.2.3. Drug Content

The percentage drug content of all ten sampled capsules were within the standard range of 85.0–115% (Table5) and confirms that the encapsulation process as well as other preencapsulation procedures were carried out accurately. The results also indicate that the formulated capsules will provide the required therapeutic dose without any overdose or underdosage that would be harmful or detrimental to the patient.Table 5
Assay of formulated capsules.
Capsule numberDrug content (%)199.32 ± 0.02291.86 ± 0.033101.53 ± 0.10495.59 ± 0.08599.32 ± 0.06695.59 ± 0.057101.53 ± 0.04891.86 ± 0.069101.53 ± 0.071099.32 ± 0.04


### 3.2.4. In Vitro Dissolution ofAnnona muricata Extract from Capsules

According to the data (Figure1), 99.29% of the extract was released at the 45th minute. This implies that the capsules passed the dissolution test and can dissolve well in physiological solution, allowing the extract to be absorbed and the intended pharmacological activity to be achieved [11, 13].Figure 1
Release profile ofAnnona muricata extract from capsules.


## 3.2.1. Capsule Weight Uniformity

The weight uniformity ofAnnona muricata capsules as given in Table 3 complied with the weight uniformity specifications according to the International Pharmacopeia [12]. This implies that each manufactured capsule potentially has the exact amount of the Annona muricata extract and excipients specified, with little variability, reducing the risk of under dosing and overdosing.Table 3
Weight uniformity of formulated capsules.
Quantity of capsules usedAverage weight (g)Quantity of capsules deviating by ±5%Quantity of capsules deviating by ±10%200.450NoneNone


## 3.2.2. Disintegration Profile of Formulated Capsules

Based on the results given in Table4, the formulated capsules passed the disintegration test as stipulated by the British Pharmacopeia [11]. This indicates that the capsules will release their contents within time for further dissolution of the extract to occur.Table 4
Disintegration time of formulated capsules.
Disintegration test1st determination2nd determinationAverageTime (minutes)2.602.402.50 ± 0.14


## 3.2.3. Drug Content

The percentage drug content of all ten sampled capsules were within the standard range of 85.0–115% (Table5) and confirms that the encapsulation process as well as other preencapsulation procedures were carried out accurately. The results also indicate that the formulated capsules will provide the required therapeutic dose without any overdose or underdosage that would be harmful or detrimental to the patient.Table 5
Assay of formulated capsules.
Capsule numberDrug content (%)199.32 ± 0.02291.86 ± 0.033101.53 ± 0.10495.59 ± 0.08599.32 ± 0.06695.59 ± 0.057101.53 ± 0.04891.86 ± 0.069101.53 ± 0.071099.32 ± 0.04


## 3.2.4. In Vitro Dissolution ofAnnona muricata Extract from Capsules

According to the data (Figure1), 99.29% of the extract was released at the 45th minute. This implies that the capsules passed the dissolution test and can dissolve well in physiological solution, allowing the extract to be absorbed and the intended pharmacological activity to be achieved [11, 13].Figure 1
Release profile ofAnnona muricata extract from capsules.


## 3.3. Quality Assessment ofAnnona muricata Suspension

### 3.3.1. Appearance Test

Over the course of four weeks, the formulated suspension was closely monitored for the appearance or absence of undesired physical changes. There were no unwanted physical changes in the prepared suspension (Table6). This shows that the suspension is physically stable and retains its aesthetic attractiveness and that the excipients employed in the formulation were appropriate [10, 19].Table 6
Physical stability of formulated suspension.
WeekPhysical instability (aggregation, caking, crystal growth formation)1No physical instability observed2No physical instability observed3No physical instability observed4No physical instability observed


### 3.3.2. Sedimentation Volume and Rate of Formulated Suspension

A good suspension, in order to improve uniform and accurate dosing, should not have the suspended particles settling quickly. The sedimentation volume of an ideal suspension should be close to 1 with a correspondingly low sedimentation rate [19–21]. This property was evident in the formulated suspension (Figure 2).Figure 2
Effect of time on the sedimentation volume ofAnnona muricata suspension.


### 3.3.3. Rheology, Redispersibility, and pH of Formulated Suspension

There was no statistical variation (P≥0.05) in the pH of the formulated suspension (Table 7) to indicate any physicochemical change [19, 22, 23]. The flow time of the suspension was short with a correspondingly high apparent viscosity for easy pourability (Table 7) [16, 19, 22]. Throughout the study period, the solid particles were redispersed with less than ten (10) strokes (Table 7). The prepared suspension possessed pseudoplastic flow, which implies that it may be swiftly redispersed with modest agitation, and the appropriate amount can be easily drawn (Figure 3). This feature is critical for a good suspension [24].Table 7
Physicochemical properties ofAnnona muricata suspension.
WeekpHFlow time (s)Apparent viscosity (η) (mL/s)Redispersibility (number of strokes)06.93 ± 0.012ns8.68 ± 0.581.153 ± 0.28716.94 ± 0.013ns8.67 ± 0.031.155 ± 0.19726.92 ± 0.010ns8.73 ± 0.501.147 ± 0.31936.93 ± 0.016ns8.64 ± 0.451.159 ± 0.37746.93 ± 0.014ns8.62 ± 0.251.161 ± 0.097Figure 3
Rheology of formulated suspension.


### 3.3.4. Drug Content

All sampled doses passed the drug content test (Table8) [11]. This implies that each volume will have the exact amount of extract needed, preventing overdosing and underdosing, both of which are hazardous to the patient’s health.Table 8
Assay of formulated suspension.
Sampled dose numberAbsorbanceDrug content (%)10.4391.8620.4391.8630.46101.5340.4495.5950.4391.8660.4599.3270.46101.5380.46101.5390.4599.32100.4495.59


### 3.3.5. In Vitro Dissolution Profile ofAnnona muricata Extract from Formulated Suspension

According to the data (Figure4), 99.20% of the extract was released at the 45th minute which complies with pharmacopeia specifications. This implies that the capsules can dissolve well in physiological solution, allowing the extract to be absorbed and eliciting the intended therapeutic effect [11, 22].Figure 4
Release profile ofAnnona muricata extract from suspension.


## 3.3.1. Appearance Test

Over the course of four weeks, the formulated suspension was closely monitored for the appearance or absence of undesired physical changes. There were no unwanted physical changes in the prepared suspension (Table6). This shows that the suspension is physically stable and retains its aesthetic attractiveness and that the excipients employed in the formulation were appropriate [10, 19].Table 6
Physical stability of formulated suspension.
WeekPhysical instability (aggregation, caking, crystal growth formation)1No physical instability observed2No physical instability observed3No physical instability observed4No physical instability observed


## 3.3.2. Sedimentation Volume and Rate of Formulated Suspension

A good suspension, in order to improve uniform and accurate dosing, should not have the suspended particles settling quickly. The sedimentation volume of an ideal suspension should be close to 1 with a correspondingly low sedimentation rate [19–21]. This property was evident in the formulated suspension (Figure 2).Figure 2
Effect of time on the sedimentation volume ofAnnona muricata suspension.


## 3.3.3. Rheology, Redispersibility, and pH of Formulated Suspension

There was no statistical variation (P≥0.05) in the pH of the formulated suspension (Table 7) to indicate any physicochemical change [19, 22, 23]. The flow time of the suspension was short with a correspondingly high apparent viscosity for easy pourability (Table 7) [16, 19, 22]. Throughout the study period, the solid particles were redispersed with less than ten (10) strokes (Table 7). The prepared suspension possessed pseudoplastic flow, which implies that it may be swiftly redispersed with modest agitation, and the appropriate amount can be easily drawn (Figure 3). This feature is critical for a good suspension [24].Table 7
Physicochemical properties ofAnnona muricata suspension.
WeekpHFlow time (s)Apparent viscosity (η) (mL/s)Redispersibility (number of strokes)06.93 ± 0.012ns8.68 ± 0.581.153 ± 0.28716.94 ± 0.013ns8.67 ± 0.031.155 ± 0.19726.92 ± 0.010ns8.73 ± 0.501.147 ± 0.31936.93 ± 0.016ns8.64 ± 0.451.159 ± 0.37746.93 ± 0.014ns8.62 ± 0.251.161 ± 0.097Figure 3
Rheology of formulated suspension.


## 3.3.4. Drug Content

All sampled doses passed the drug content test (Table8) [11]. This implies that each volume will have the exact amount of extract needed, preventing overdosing and underdosing, both of which are hazardous to the patient’s health.Table 8
Assay of formulated suspension.
Sampled dose numberAbsorbanceDrug content (%)10.4391.8620.4391.8630.46101.5340.4495.5950.4391.8660.4599.3270.46101.5380.46101.5390.4599.32100.4495.59


## 3.3.5. In Vitro Dissolution Profile ofAnnona muricata Extract from Formulated Suspension

According to the data (Figure4), 99.20% of the extract was released at the 45th minute which complies with pharmacopeia specifications. This implies that the capsules can dissolve well in physiological solution, allowing the extract to be absorbed and eliciting the intended therapeutic effect [11, 22].Figure 4
Release profile ofAnnona muricata extract from suspension.


## 4. Conclusion

This study has shown that the ethanolic extract ofAnnona muricata can be successfully formulated into capsules and suspension. The prepared dosage forms satisfied the pharmacopeia requirements for quality evaluation and may be used as appropriate alternatives in the management and treatment of diarrhea.



---

*Source: 1792437-2021-12-14.xml*