# Efficacy and Safety of the Triple Therapy Containing Ilaprazole, Levofloxacin, and Amoxicillin as First-Line Treatment inHelicobacter pylori Infections

Authors: Hyo Jun Ahn; Dong Pil Kim; Myeong Su Chu; Hyeon Jeong Yun; Seok-Hwan Kim; Seung Woo Lee; Dong Soo Lee
Journal: Gastroenterology Research and Practice
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Background and Aims. To establish the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin as a first-line eradication treatment for Helicobacter pylori. Methods. Patients with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, or gastritis, as detected by esophagogastroduodenoscopy with confirmed H. pylori infection between September 2014 and November 2015, were enrolled in the study. All participants received ilaprazole (10 mg bid), levofloxacin (500 mg bid), and amoxicillin (1000 mg bid) for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by a 13C-urea breath test at 6–8 weeks after the end of treatment. Results. Of 84 patients included in the analysis, the eradication rate was 88.8% in the per protocol group (n=80). Demographic factors such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), alcohol, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and peptic ulcer did not affect the eradication rate. However, multivariate analysis showed that overweight patients and patients with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) had a significantly lower eradication rate than patients with normal BMI and without CVA. Laboratory test results did not change significantly after treatment. A total of six (7.5%) patients developed eight adverse reactions. Conclusions. A 10-day triple therapy containing ilaprazole, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin is a safe alternative first-line eradication treatment for H. pylori.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Helicobacter pylori colonize in the stomach and cause various diseases such as peptic ulcers, gastric cancer, and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Furthermore, H. pylori infections cause extragastric diseases such as iron-deficiency anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency, and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Current clinical guidelines recommend a clarithromycin-containing standard triple therapy (STT) as the first-line treatment and a bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BCQT) or levofloxacin-based therapy (LBT) as the second-line treatment after failure of the STT [1, 2]. However, due to increasing clarithromycin resistance [3], the eradication rate using the STT has decreased and ranges from 61.8 to 77%. The Maastricht IV/Florence consensus report recommends that STT should not be used in regions with a clarithromycin resistance rate of more than 15–20%. The second-line treatment, BCQT, has poor compliance due to side effects and complicated administration. For this reason, extensive research has been conducted to find alternative therapies such as sequential therapy, concomitant therapy, LBT, and rifabutin-based therapy to replace STT. LBT has been mainly used as a rescue therapy because quinolone resistance is a concern. However, LBT as a first-line therapy has remained controversial. Clinical trials investigating LBT as a first-line therapy have reported eradication rates from 72 to 96% [4, 5].Ilaprazole is a new-generation PPI that is well known for its extended plasma half-life and metabolism, which is not significantly influenced by CYP2C19 [6–8].In this study, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole (10 mg bid), levofloxacin (500 mg bid), and amoxicillin (1000 mg bid) as a first-line treatment forH. pylori infection.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Study Population

In this single-center prospective study, we included patients with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer (including scar), and gastritis with confirmedH. pylori infection by histology, rapid urease test, or 13C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients were recruited from the outpatient gastroenterology department in Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital between September 2014 and November 2015. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Catholic University of Korea and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02352701). All participants agreed to take part in this clinical study and provided informed consent. Exclusion criteria included age under 20 years; allergy or hypersensitivity to the test drugs; pregnancy, breast feeding, childbearing age, and not using appropriate contraception; uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) or hypertension (HTN); drug or alcohol abuse; history of malignancy within the last 5 years (excluding those who underwent endoscopic curative resection for gastric dysplasia or early gastric cancer); history of surgery such as esophagectomy or gastrectomy; hereditary diseases such as galactose intolerance, lactase deficiency, and glucose-galactose malabsorption; and current participation in another clinical trial. Furthermore, we excluded subjects who had the following laboratory abnormalities: (1) ≥1.5 times the upper limit of normal in terms of total bilirubin and creatinine (Cr) levels and (2) ≥2 times the upper limit of normal in terms of aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels. We dropped out subjects who (1) withdrew agreement to participate, (2) took a drug that adversely affected the efficacy and safety of the test drugs during the study, and (3) had less than 80% drug compliance. We withdrew subjects who had critical adverse reactions that required hospitalization and laboratory abnormalities over 1.5 times that of baseline values, regardless of whether or not the cause was the test drugs.


### 2.2. Study Design

This study used a single-center prospective observational clinical trial design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an ilaprazole-based triple therapy as a first-line therapy forH. pylori treatment. All subjects received ilaprazole (10 mg bid), levofloxacin (500 mg bid), and amoxicillin (1000 mg bid) for 10 days and understood that they were required to visit our laboratory or outpatient clinic following completion of the study protocol. During the screening phase of the study, informed consent was obtained. We also obtained demographic data, performed a physical examination and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), obtained baseline laboratory values, and confirmed H. pylori infection by histology, 13C-UBT, or rapid urease test in subjects with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, or gastritis. Two weeks after screening, we assessed participants with respect to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and prescribed the test drugs. After completion of the eradication therapy, we assessed adverse reactions, drug compliance, and laboratory test results.


### 2.3. Follow-Up EGD and13C-Urea Breath Test (UBT)

After 6–8 weeks of the eradication therapy, we performed EGD and assessedH. pylori status by 13C-UBT. Ulcer healing was considered successful if an ulcer in active or healing stage resolved to scar stage. To perform UBT, patients swallowed 13C-urea-labeled compositions (Helifinder kit; Medichems, Seoul, South Korea). After 20 min, the 13CO2/12CO2 ratio was determined with a HeliView analyzer (Medichems) and was considered positive if the delta (0–20 min) ratio of 13CO2/12CO2 was more than 2 (positive UBT).


### 2.4. Drug Compliance and Adverse Reactions

Drug compliance and adverse reactions were assessed during scheduled visits and phone calls. We defined significant drug compliance as intake of more than 80% of the test drug and planned to exclude participants with less than 80% compliance. Adverse reactions were graded based on the need for treatment and hospitalization.


### 2.5. Endpoints

The primary endpoint of the study was anH. pylori eradication rate. The secondary endpoints were safe during study period and ulcer healing rate within the PUD group.


### 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Categorical data were compared using the X2 test or Fisher’s exact test, and continuous data were compared using Student’s t-test. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed for evaluation of major risk factors affecting the eradication rate, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were provided for all comparisons. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows software (ver. 22.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).


## 2.1. Study Population

In this single-center prospective study, we included patients with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer (including scar), and gastritis with confirmedH. pylori infection by histology, rapid urease test, or 13C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients were recruited from the outpatient gastroenterology department in Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital between September 2014 and November 2015. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Catholic University of Korea and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02352701). All participants agreed to take part in this clinical study and provided informed consent. Exclusion criteria included age under 20 years; allergy or hypersensitivity to the test drugs; pregnancy, breast feeding, childbearing age, and not using appropriate contraception; uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) or hypertension (HTN); drug or alcohol abuse; history of malignancy within the last 5 years (excluding those who underwent endoscopic curative resection for gastric dysplasia or early gastric cancer); history of surgery such as esophagectomy or gastrectomy; hereditary diseases such as galactose intolerance, lactase deficiency, and glucose-galactose malabsorption; and current participation in another clinical trial. Furthermore, we excluded subjects who had the following laboratory abnormalities: (1) ≥1.5 times the upper limit of normal in terms of total bilirubin and creatinine (Cr) levels and (2) ≥2 times the upper limit of normal in terms of aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels. We dropped out subjects who (1) withdrew agreement to participate, (2) took a drug that adversely affected the efficacy and safety of the test drugs during the study, and (3) had less than 80% drug compliance. We withdrew subjects who had critical adverse reactions that required hospitalization and laboratory abnormalities over 1.5 times that of baseline values, regardless of whether or not the cause was the test drugs.


## 2.2. Study Design

This study used a single-center prospective observational clinical trial design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an ilaprazole-based triple therapy as a first-line therapy forH. pylori treatment. All subjects received ilaprazole (10 mg bid), levofloxacin (500 mg bid), and amoxicillin (1000 mg bid) for 10 days and understood that they were required to visit our laboratory or outpatient clinic following completion of the study protocol. During the screening phase of the study, informed consent was obtained. We also obtained demographic data, performed a physical examination and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), obtained baseline laboratory values, and confirmed H. pylori infection by histology, 13C-UBT, or rapid urease test in subjects with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, or gastritis. Two weeks after screening, we assessed participants with respect to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and prescribed the test drugs. After completion of the eradication therapy, we assessed adverse reactions, drug compliance, and laboratory test results.


## 2.3. Follow-Up EGD and13C-Urea Breath Test (UBT)

After 6–8 weeks of the eradication therapy, we performed EGD and assessedH. pylori status by 13C-UBT. Ulcer healing was considered successful if an ulcer in active or healing stage resolved to scar stage. To perform UBT, patients swallowed 13C-urea-labeled compositions (Helifinder kit; Medichems, Seoul, South Korea). After 20 min, the 13CO2/12CO2 ratio was determined with a HeliView analyzer (Medichems) and was considered positive if the delta (0–20 min) ratio of 13CO2/12CO2 was more than 2 (positive UBT).


## 2.4. Drug Compliance and Adverse Reactions

Drug compliance and adverse reactions were assessed during scheduled visits and phone calls. We defined significant drug compliance as intake of more than 80% of the test drug and planned to exclude participants with less than 80% compliance. Adverse reactions were graded based on the need for treatment and hospitalization.


## 2.5. Endpoints

The primary endpoint of the study was anH. pylori eradication rate. The secondary endpoints were safe during study period and ulcer healing rate within the PUD group.


## 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Categorical data were compared using the X2 test or Fisher’s exact test, and continuous data were compared using Student’s t-test. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed for evaluation of major risk factors affecting the eradication rate, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were provided for all comparisons. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows software (ver. 22.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Baseline Characteristics of the Subjects

Baseline characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table1. In total, 84 subjects were included in the study and 4 subjects were dropped out because their drug compliance was below 80%. Therefore, 80 subjects completed the study, of whom 32 (40%) were male and 48 (60%) were female. In the per protocol (PP) group, the age of the subjects ranged from 41 to 73 years, and the mean age was 57.41 ± 7.73 years. The body mass index (BMI) of the patients ranged from 15.97 to 30.85, and the mean BMI was 24.27 ± 2.85. Of the subjects, 11 (13.8%) were current smokers, 18 (22.5%) had a history of alcohol ingestion, 8 (10%) had a history of DM, 29 (36.3%) had a history of HTN, and 6 (7.5%) had a history of liver disease (3 subjects were in an inactive hepatitis B virus (HBV) carrier state, 2 had compensated liver cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis B, and 1 had chronic hepatitis C). In total, 18 (22.5%) subjects had the following histories beyond those mentioned above (number of subjects is shown in parentheses): Addison’s disease (1), benign prostatic hyperplasia (2), hyperlipidemia (3), psoriasis (1), rheumatoid arthritis (1), thyroid cancer (8), ovarian cancer (1), and gastric dysplasia with endoscopic mucosal resection (1). Of the subjects, nine (11.25%) took nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antithrombotic agents, six took aspirin, two took clopidogrel, and one took NSAIDs only. Twenty (25%) patients were peptic ulcer disease (PUD) patients, and the other 60 (75%) patients were gastritis patients. There were no abnormal findings on baseline laboratory tests (Table 2).Table 1
Baseline characteristics of the participants.
Characteristics
ITT group
PP group
Number
84
80
Mean age, years ± SD
57.37 ± 7.62
57.41 ± 7.73
Male,n (%)
34 (40.5)
32 (40.0)
Height, m ± SD
1.62 ± 0.08
1.61 ± 0.73
Weight, kg ± SD
63.6 ± 9.99
63.78 ± 10.18
BMI, kg/m2 ± SD
24.23 ± 2.81
24.27 ± 2.85
Alcohol,n (%)
18 (21.4)
18 (22.5)
Smoking,n (%)
11 (13.1)
11 (13.8)
DM,n (%)
8 (9.5)
8 (10.0)
HTN,n (%)
29 (34.5)
29 (36.3)
CVA,n (%)
3 (3.6)
3 (3.8)
Liver disease,n (%)
6 (7.1)
6 (7.5)
Others,n (%)
20 (23.8)
18 (22.5)
NSAIDS or antithromboticagent, n (%)
9 (10.7)
9 (11.25)
With peptic ulcer,n (%)
21 (25.0)
20 (25.0)
ITT: intention-to-treat; PP: per protocol; SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index; DM: diabetes mellitus; HTN: hypertension; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.Table 2
Comparison of laboratory findings before and after treatment.
Before treatment
After treatment
p value
White blood cell count (103/mm3)
5.849 ± 1.515
5.891 ± 1.424
0.753
Hemoglobin (g/dL)
14.040 ± 1.288
13.928 ± 1.2409
0.123
Platelet count (103/mm3)
228.33 ± 42.698
222.11 ± 41.633
0.054
Total protein (g/dL)
7.224 ± 0.386
7.230 ± 0.326
0.868
Albumin (g/dL)
4.506 ± 0.299
4.578 ± 0.268
0.025∗
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)
0.773 ± 0.448
0.750 ± 0.552
0.308
Aspartate transaminase (IU/L)
22.33 ± 4.862
22.70 ± 6.053
0.580
Alanine transaminase (IU/L)
21.95 ± 8.968
22.78 ± 10.624
0.472
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L)
61.105 ± 16.448
62.150 ± 16.613
0.503
γ-Glutamyl transpeptidase (IU/L)
22.09 ± 15.693
22.70 ± 13.756
0.063
Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL)
13.620 ± 3.475
13.694 ± 3.376
0.863
Creatinine (mg/dL)
0.781 ± 0.173
0.755 ± 0.163
0.008∗
Glucose (mg/dL)
101.31 ± 13.392
99.95 ± 12.849
0.139
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
200.14 ± 34.964
195.49 ± 30.820
0.185
Triglyceride (mg/dL)
133.56 ± 80.728
128.68 ± 80.598
0.462
∗
P
<
0.05.


### 3.2. Laboratory Changes after Eradication

There were no significant laboratory changes afterH. pylori eradication. Although the albumin level increased from 4.507 ± 0.300 to 4.506 ± 0.299 (p=0.025) and the creatinine level decreased from 0.781 ± 0.173 to 0.755 ± 0.163 (p=0.008), after eradication, these changes were not clinically significant. Also, H. pylori eradication had no effect on the glucose and lipid profile (Table 2).


### 3.3. Eradication Rate

The eradication rate was 84.5% (95% CI: 65.8–106.5%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group and 88.8% (95% CI: 69.3–112.0%) in the per protocol (PP) group. Demographic factors including age, gender, alcohol consumption, smoking status, and presence of HTN, DM, and liver disease (such as chronic viral hepatitis) did not affect the eradication rate. The presence or absence of peptic ulcer also did not affect the eradication rate. Subjects were categorized as underweight (BMI<18.5), normal weight (BMI=18.5–24.99), overweight (BMI=25.00–29.99), or obese (BMI≥30). There were few underweight (n=1) and obese (n=1) subjects. In subgroup analysis, the eradication rate of subjects with normal BMI was higher than that of overweight subjects (95.6% versus 78.8%; p=0.032) on PP analysis. However, there was no significant difference on ITT analysis. Among the three subjects who had a history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), the eradication rate was 33.3%. CVA was a demographic factor that led to a decrease in the eradication rate, but NSAID or antithrombotic agent use had no effect (Table 3). In multiple regression analysis, overweight subjects had a significantly lower eradication rate than normal weight subjects (odds ratio OR=5.929, 95% CI: 1.047–33.585; p=0.076). Subjects with CVA also had a lower eradication rate on multiple regression analysis (OR=18.571, 95% CI: 1.488–231.719; p=0.023). The presence of DM, HTN, liver disease, peptic ulcer disease, drug history, alcohol, and smoking did not affect the eradication rate (Table 4).Table 3
Subgroup analysis of eradication rate.
Group (n)
Intention-to-treat analysis
Per protocol analysis
Eradication rate,n (%)
Relative risk
95% CI
p value
Eradication rate,n (%)
Relative risk
95% CI
p value
Total
75 (84.5)
71 (88.8)
Age
0.947
1.000
<60 years old
43 (84.3)
1.035
0.370–2.894
43 (89.6)
1.024
0.870–1.205
≥60 years old
28 (84.8)
0.994
0.825–1.197
28 (87.5)
0.833
0.242–2.869
Gender
0.650
1.000
Male
28 (82.4)
0.958
0.791–1.160
28 (87.5)
0.977
0.830–1.149
Female
43 (86.0)
1.261
0.464–3.425
43 (89.6)
1.200
0.349–4.132
BMI
0.064
0.032∗
Normal BMI
43 (91.5)
1.232
0.995–1.525
43 (95.6)
1.213
1.005–1.464
Overweight BMI
26 (74.3)
0.331
0.111–0.988
26 (78.8)
0.210
0.046–0.945
Alcohol
0.281
0.676
Drinker
17 (94.4)
3.279
0.455–23.522
16 (94.4)
2.323
0.311–17.361
Nondrinker
54 (81.8)
0.866
0.738–1.016
55 (87.1)
0.922
0.796–1.069
Smoking
1.000
1.000
Smoker
10 (90.9)
1.268
0.260–12.570
10 (90.9)
1.275
0.176–9.229
Nonsmoker
61 (83.6)
0.919
0.743–1.137
61 (88.4)
0.972
0.792–1.194
NSAIDs orantithrombotic agents
0.603
0.220
Yes
6 (75)
0.579
0.155–2.165
6 (75)
0.389
0.097–1.564
No
65 (85.5)
1.140
0.756–1.719
65 (90.3)
1.204
0.801–1.809
HTN
0.203
0.476
Yes
27 (93.1)
2.900
0.689–12.215
27 (93.1)
1.990
0.442–8.954
No
44 (80.0)
0.859
0.728–1.014
44 (86.3)
0.927
0.799–1.074
DM
1.000
1.000
Yes
7 (87.5)
1.263
0.188–8.492
7 (87.5)
0.889
0.127–6.225
No
64 (84.2)
0.962
0.728–1.273
64 (88.9)
1.016
0.772–1.337
CVA
0.063
0.033∗
Yes
1 (33.3)
0.206
0.078–0.544
1 (33.3)
0.138
0.048–0.402
No
69 (86.3)
2.588
0.521–12.851
69 (90.8)
2.724
0.549–13.516
Liver disease
1.000
0.523
Yes
5 (83.3)
0.923
0.143–5.950
5 (83.3)
0.649
0.097–4.359
No
66 (84.6)
1.015
0.701–1.470
66 (89.2)
1.070
0.742–1.544
PUD
1.000
1.000
Yes
18 (85.7)
1.019
0.830–1.251
18 (90)
1.019
0.857–1.211
No
53 (84.1)
0.900
0.273–2.964
53 (88.3)
0.857
0.194–3.795
CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; HTN: hypertension; DM: diabetes mellitus; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; PUD: peptic ulcer disease.∗P<0.05.Table 4
Risk factor associated with eradication failure by multiple logistic regression analysis.
Variables
Odds ratio
95% CI
p value
≥60 years old
1.036
0.124–8.628
0.974
Female
0.394
0.033–4.758
0.464
Overweight BMI
5.929
1.047–33.585
0.044∗
HTN
0.040
0.001-2.893
0.140
DM
11.968
0.091–1569.267
0.318
CVA
18.571
1.488–231.719
0.023∗
Liver disease
17.027
0.374–774.174
0.145
Without peptic ulcer
1.262
0.089–17.928
0.864
CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; HTN: hypertension; DM: diabetes mellitus; CVA: cerebrovascular accident.∗P<0.05.In the PUD subgroup (n=20) in PP analysis, the ulcer healing rate was 90%.


### 3.4. Compliance and Adverse Events

In total, 80 subjects completed the study, all of whom were more than 80% compliant. The mean compliance rate was 99.6%. Six subjects developed eight adverse reactions (Table5). The incidence of adverse reactions was 7.5% and the frequency was 10%. The most common side effects were nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. The severity of the adverse events ranged from grade 1 to grade 2 and no subjects required hospitalization.Table 5
Adverse reactions.
n (%)
All
8 (10%)
Nausea/vomiting
3
Dizziness
2
Abdominal pain
1
Diarrhea
1
Headache
1


## 3.1. Baseline Characteristics of the Subjects

Baseline characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table1. In total, 84 subjects were included in the study and 4 subjects were dropped out because their drug compliance was below 80%. Therefore, 80 subjects completed the study, of whom 32 (40%) were male and 48 (60%) were female. In the per protocol (PP) group, the age of the subjects ranged from 41 to 73 years, and the mean age was 57.41 ± 7.73 years. The body mass index (BMI) of the patients ranged from 15.97 to 30.85, and the mean BMI was 24.27 ± 2.85. Of the subjects, 11 (13.8%) were current smokers, 18 (22.5%) had a history of alcohol ingestion, 8 (10%) had a history of DM, 29 (36.3%) had a history of HTN, and 6 (7.5%) had a history of liver disease (3 subjects were in an inactive hepatitis B virus (HBV) carrier state, 2 had compensated liver cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis B, and 1 had chronic hepatitis C). In total, 18 (22.5%) subjects had the following histories beyond those mentioned above (number of subjects is shown in parentheses): Addison’s disease (1), benign prostatic hyperplasia (2), hyperlipidemia (3), psoriasis (1), rheumatoid arthritis (1), thyroid cancer (8), ovarian cancer (1), and gastric dysplasia with endoscopic mucosal resection (1). Of the subjects, nine (11.25%) took nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antithrombotic agents, six took aspirin, two took clopidogrel, and one took NSAIDs only. Twenty (25%) patients were peptic ulcer disease (PUD) patients, and the other 60 (75%) patients were gastritis patients. There were no abnormal findings on baseline laboratory tests (Table 2).Table 1
Baseline characteristics of the participants.
Characteristics
ITT group
PP group
Number
84
80
Mean age, years ± SD
57.37 ± 7.62
57.41 ± 7.73
Male,n (%)
34 (40.5)
32 (40.0)
Height, m ± SD
1.62 ± 0.08
1.61 ± 0.73
Weight, kg ± SD
63.6 ± 9.99
63.78 ± 10.18
BMI, kg/m2 ± SD
24.23 ± 2.81
24.27 ± 2.85
Alcohol,n (%)
18 (21.4)
18 (22.5)
Smoking,n (%)
11 (13.1)
11 (13.8)
DM,n (%)
8 (9.5)
8 (10.0)
HTN,n (%)
29 (34.5)
29 (36.3)
CVA,n (%)
3 (3.6)
3 (3.8)
Liver disease,n (%)
6 (7.1)
6 (7.5)
Others,n (%)
20 (23.8)
18 (22.5)
NSAIDS or antithromboticagent, n (%)
9 (10.7)
9 (11.25)
With peptic ulcer,n (%)
21 (25.0)
20 (25.0)
ITT: intention-to-treat; PP: per protocol; SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index; DM: diabetes mellitus; HTN: hypertension; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.Table 2
Comparison of laboratory findings before and after treatment.
Before treatment
After treatment
p value
White blood cell count (103/mm3)
5.849 ± 1.515
5.891 ± 1.424
0.753
Hemoglobin (g/dL)
14.040 ± 1.288
13.928 ± 1.2409
0.123
Platelet count (103/mm3)
228.33 ± 42.698
222.11 ± 41.633
0.054
Total protein (g/dL)
7.224 ± 0.386
7.230 ± 0.326
0.868
Albumin (g/dL)
4.506 ± 0.299
4.578 ± 0.268
0.025∗
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)
0.773 ± 0.448
0.750 ± 0.552
0.308
Aspartate transaminase (IU/L)
22.33 ± 4.862
22.70 ± 6.053
0.580
Alanine transaminase (IU/L)
21.95 ± 8.968
22.78 ± 10.624
0.472
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L)
61.105 ± 16.448
62.150 ± 16.613
0.503
γ-Glutamyl transpeptidase (IU/L)
22.09 ± 15.693
22.70 ± 13.756
0.063
Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL)
13.620 ± 3.475
13.694 ± 3.376
0.863
Creatinine (mg/dL)
0.781 ± 0.173
0.755 ± 0.163
0.008∗
Glucose (mg/dL)
101.31 ± 13.392
99.95 ± 12.849
0.139
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
200.14 ± 34.964
195.49 ± 30.820
0.185
Triglyceride (mg/dL)
133.56 ± 80.728
128.68 ± 80.598
0.462
∗
P
<
0.05.


## 3.2. Laboratory Changes after Eradication

There were no significant laboratory changes afterH. pylori eradication. Although the albumin level increased from 4.507 ± 0.300 to 4.506 ± 0.299 (p=0.025) and the creatinine level decreased from 0.781 ± 0.173 to 0.755 ± 0.163 (p=0.008), after eradication, these changes were not clinically significant. Also, H. pylori eradication had no effect on the glucose and lipid profile (Table 2).


## 3.3. Eradication Rate

The eradication rate was 84.5% (95% CI: 65.8–106.5%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group and 88.8% (95% CI: 69.3–112.0%) in the per protocol (PP) group. Demographic factors including age, gender, alcohol consumption, smoking status, and presence of HTN, DM, and liver disease (such as chronic viral hepatitis) did not affect the eradication rate. The presence or absence of peptic ulcer also did not affect the eradication rate. Subjects were categorized as underweight (BMI<18.5), normal weight (BMI=18.5–24.99), overweight (BMI=25.00–29.99), or obese (BMI≥30). There were few underweight (n=1) and obese (n=1) subjects. In subgroup analysis, the eradication rate of subjects with normal BMI was higher than that of overweight subjects (95.6% versus 78.8%; p=0.032) on PP analysis. However, there was no significant difference on ITT analysis. Among the three subjects who had a history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), the eradication rate was 33.3%. CVA was a demographic factor that led to a decrease in the eradication rate, but NSAID or antithrombotic agent use had no effect (Table 3). In multiple regression analysis, overweight subjects had a significantly lower eradication rate than normal weight subjects (odds ratio OR=5.929, 95% CI: 1.047–33.585; p=0.076). Subjects with CVA also had a lower eradication rate on multiple regression analysis (OR=18.571, 95% CI: 1.488–231.719; p=0.023). The presence of DM, HTN, liver disease, peptic ulcer disease, drug history, alcohol, and smoking did not affect the eradication rate (Table 4).Table 3
Subgroup analysis of eradication rate.
Group (n)
Intention-to-treat analysis
Per protocol analysis
Eradication rate,n (%)
Relative risk
95% CI
p value
Eradication rate,n (%)
Relative risk
95% CI
p value
Total
75 (84.5)
71 (88.8)
Age
0.947
1.000
<60 years old
43 (84.3)
1.035
0.370–2.894
43 (89.6)
1.024
0.870–1.205
≥60 years old
28 (84.8)
0.994
0.825–1.197
28 (87.5)
0.833
0.242–2.869
Gender
0.650
1.000
Male
28 (82.4)
0.958
0.791–1.160
28 (87.5)
0.977
0.830–1.149
Female
43 (86.0)
1.261
0.464–3.425
43 (89.6)
1.200
0.349–4.132
BMI
0.064
0.032∗
Normal BMI
43 (91.5)
1.232
0.995–1.525
43 (95.6)
1.213
1.005–1.464
Overweight BMI
26 (74.3)
0.331
0.111–0.988
26 (78.8)
0.210
0.046–0.945
Alcohol
0.281
0.676
Drinker
17 (94.4)
3.279
0.455–23.522
16 (94.4)
2.323
0.311–17.361
Nondrinker
54 (81.8)
0.866
0.738–1.016
55 (87.1)
0.922
0.796–1.069
Smoking
1.000
1.000
Smoker
10 (90.9)
1.268
0.260–12.570
10 (90.9)
1.275
0.176–9.229
Nonsmoker
61 (83.6)
0.919
0.743–1.137
61 (88.4)
0.972
0.792–1.194
NSAIDs orantithrombotic agents
0.603
0.220
Yes
6 (75)
0.579
0.155–2.165
6 (75)
0.389
0.097–1.564
No
65 (85.5)
1.140
0.756–1.719
65 (90.3)
1.204
0.801–1.809
HTN
0.203
0.476
Yes
27 (93.1)
2.900
0.689–12.215
27 (93.1)
1.990
0.442–8.954
No
44 (80.0)
0.859
0.728–1.014
44 (86.3)
0.927
0.799–1.074
DM
1.000
1.000
Yes
7 (87.5)
1.263
0.188–8.492
7 (87.5)
0.889
0.127–6.225
No
64 (84.2)
0.962
0.728–1.273
64 (88.9)
1.016
0.772–1.337
CVA
0.063
0.033∗
Yes
1 (33.3)
0.206
0.078–0.544
1 (33.3)
0.138
0.048–0.402
No
69 (86.3)
2.588
0.521–12.851
69 (90.8)
2.724
0.549–13.516
Liver disease
1.000
0.523
Yes
5 (83.3)
0.923
0.143–5.950
5 (83.3)
0.649
0.097–4.359
No
66 (84.6)
1.015
0.701–1.470
66 (89.2)
1.070
0.742–1.544
PUD
1.000
1.000
Yes
18 (85.7)
1.019
0.830–1.251
18 (90)
1.019
0.857–1.211
No
53 (84.1)
0.900
0.273–2.964
53 (88.3)
0.857
0.194–3.795
CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; HTN: hypertension; DM: diabetes mellitus; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; PUD: peptic ulcer disease.∗P<0.05.Table 4
Risk factor associated with eradication failure by multiple logistic regression analysis.
Variables
Odds ratio
95% CI
p value
≥60 years old
1.036
0.124–8.628
0.974
Female
0.394
0.033–4.758
0.464
Overweight BMI
5.929
1.047–33.585
0.044∗
HTN
0.040
0.001-2.893
0.140
DM
11.968
0.091–1569.267
0.318
CVA
18.571
1.488–231.719
0.023∗
Liver disease
17.027
0.374–774.174
0.145
Without peptic ulcer
1.262
0.089–17.928
0.864
CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; HTN: hypertension; DM: diabetes mellitus; CVA: cerebrovascular accident.∗P<0.05.In the PUD subgroup (n=20) in PP analysis, the ulcer healing rate was 90%.


## 3.4. Compliance and Adverse Events

In total, 80 subjects completed the study, all of whom were more than 80% compliant. The mean compliance rate was 99.6%. Six subjects developed eight adverse reactions (Table5). The incidence of adverse reactions was 7.5% and the frequency was 10%. The most common side effects were nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. The severity of the adverse events ranged from grade 1 to grade 2 and no subjects required hospitalization.Table 5
Adverse reactions.
n (%)
All
8 (10%)
Nausea/vomiting
3
Dizziness
2
Abdominal pain
1
Diarrhea
1
Headache
1


## 4. Discussion

The present study showed that a 10-day ilaprazole-based regimen consisting of ilaprazole, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin had a relatively high eradication rate and favorable safety compared with STT. Adverse events and laboratory changes were not significant during the treatment period, and CVA and being overweight were significant risk factors for low eradication rate.The clarithromycin resistance rate has increased from 9% to 17.6% in Europe and from 17.2% to 37.3% in South Korea [9–12]. The Maastricht IV/Florence consensus report recommends that STT be avoided in regions with a clarithromycin resistance rate greater than 15–20% and recommends BCQT as an alternative first-line therapy. However, BCQT has poor compliance due to side effects and complicated administration [2]. Therefore, therapies other than the current STT are needed. Alternative approaches include change of regimen and longer treatment.Levofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent that inhibits bacterial DNA topoisomerase II. LBTs have been used primarily as salvage therapies after failure of first-line therapy. Recently, many studies have investigated the use of LBT as a first-line therapy. The mean eradication rate with LBT as a first-line or rescue therapy was reported to be approximately 80% based on a meta-analysis [13, 14]. As a salvage therapy, 10 days of LBT was effective than 7 days of LBT according to meta-analysis [13]. Moreover, LBT had less adverse effects than BCQT [13].The present study showed that theH. pylori eradication rate after 10 days of LBT using ilaprazole was 88.8%. This was much higher than the eradication rate after 10 days of LBT using omeprazole and lansoprazole (72–83%) [13, 15, 16] and was comparable with that of LBT using esomeprazole (87–96%) [17, 18]. This suggests that ilaprazole may have unique properties and better pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles compared with other PPIs. CYP2C19 polymorphisms have been thought to affect the H. pylori eradication rate. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome p450 (CYP) system, primarily CYP2C19. In patients carrying the poor metabolizers (PM) genotype, the metabolism of PPIs is much slower, resulting in a PPI bioavailability that is more than 20 times that of the bioavailability in homozygous extensive metabolizers (HomEM) [19].In South Korea, recentH. pylori eradication rates have been reported to be 75.5–78.7%. This is mainly due to a high clarithromycin-resistance rate; however, it is also possible that the cause is a CYP2C19 polymorphism [20]. Ilaprazole is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 and is not influenced by CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms [21]. In addition, ilaprazole has a long half-life, which leads to a longer period of gastric acid suppression and higher ulcer healing rates compared with other PPIs. In a recent multicenter, randomized double-blind controlled trials in China, subjects taking ilaprazole had significantly higher ulcer healing rates than those taking omeprazole, especially those with the EM genotype [22]. In this study, in the PUD subgroup (n=20), the ulcer healing rate was 90%, consistent with results from previous studies.Some recent reports revealed that risk factors for eradication failure include high bacterial load, strain type, high gastric acidity, clarithromycin resistance, and low compliance [20, 23]. In the current study, demographic factors such as alcohol, smoking, HTN, DM, and liver disease (such as chronic viral hepatitis) did not affect the eradication rate. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that age, gender, NSAID use, and antithrombotic drug use did not affect the eradication rate. Overweight and CVA were risk factors for treatment failure on our multivariate analyses. With regard to BMI, there was a report claiming that overweight patients showed a significantly lower H. pylori eradication rate than controls [24], while there was a report that revealed opposite results [20]. Future research should be conducted to determine if there is a correlation between the H. pylori eradication rate and BMI. H. pylori infection may increase the risk for ischemic stroke. In a recent meta-analysis, a relative risk of 2.42 was obtained for stroke and H. pylori infection [25]; therefore, H. pylori eradication may prevent stroke [26]. However, there is no report that H. pylori eradication rate is associated with CVA. Further investigations are needed to determine if there is a causal relationship between CVA and H. pylori eradication.


## 5. Conclusions

Our ilaprazole, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin treatment regimen is a safe and a valuable alternative first-line therapy forH. pylori eradication. The safety profile of this therapy was favorable, and there were no significant laboratory changes during the treatment period. Although CVA and overweight were risk factors for eradication failure in our study, further investigation is needed to confirm this.



---

*Source: 1654907-2017-04-30.xml*