# Research on Intelligent Algorithm of the AC Motor Speed Regulation System Based on the Neural Network

Authors: Xia Liu; Gang Bai
Journal: Mobile Information Systems
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

One of the most challenging control problems has been the speed control of an alternating current (AC) motor due to the highly nonlinear characteristics and many uncertain parameters including the magnetic flux, temperature-dependent rotor resistance, and the variable load. In this study, an intelligent control algorithm is proposed for the AC motor speed control using a PID controller-based backpropagation neural network (BP-NN). The momentum factor adaptive learning rate algorithm is introduced to improve the PID-based BP-NN. A simulation model representing the complete AC motor speed regulation system is established and tested using the MATLAB program. The simulation results show that this control strategy has strong adaptability and robustness when the controlled object is unknown or the parameters change. Compared with other PID and neural network parameter adjustment methods, the model has the potential to intelligently regulate the speed of the AC motor.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In industrial production processes, traditional PID controllers are only suitable for controlling linear and stationary objects. For the control of nonlinearity, time-varying characteristics, coupling, and uncertain parameters and structures of AC asynchronous motors, traditional PID controller applications cannot achieve the ideal control effect [1]. Online control suffers from complex parameter adjustment methods because it is difficult to establish an accurate mathematical model of an AC motor. Poor parameter tuning, poor performance, and poor adaptability to the operating environment often occur during operation [2]. Therefore, robust speed control schemes must be designed to ensure that the AC motor control system achieves the expected dynamic response. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have advanced parallel information processing capabilities and excellent nonlinear mapping competencies and can be used to approximate any nonlinear function [3].The ANN is well known for its ability to provide key characteristics such as flexibility and instance-based learning [4]. ANNs are widely employed in various areas such as control, voice synthesis, and signal and speech recognition [5]. ANNs can provide an unusual solution for many technical issues that are difficult to answer by traditional methods. BP is the most commonly used approach for training an ANN. In many sectors, BP learning has become the common method and technique for modifying weights and biases while training an ANN [6].Artificial neural networks have recently received a lot of attention for their usage in system modeling and control applications. El-Sharkawi et al. [7] developed a brushless dc motor control system based on artificial neural networks. They used an offline trained ANN with an indirect model reference adaptive control strategy in their research. To improve servo performance, Shiguo et al. [8] suggested a digital control approach for a brushless dc servo system with an analog speed controller. For induction motor drive, to estimate state variables, Theocharis and Petridis [9] employed an ANN. Burton et al. [10] suggested an online random training technique for induction motor stator current regulation utilizing the ANN, in which the reference model is utilized to train the neural network. Lauren and Jinling [11] presented an improved BP algorithm and proposed a PID control system implementation scheme based on this algorithm. The results showed that the method can improve the algorithm’s convergence speed during the training process, as well as it has strong adaptive and self-learning capability. In estimating the speed and regulating the individually excited DC motor, MadhusudhanaRao and SankerRam [12] proposed the new idea of artificial neural networks (ANNs). There are two aspects of the neural control strategy. The neural estimator is used to determine the speed of the motor, whereas the neural controller creates a control signal for a converter. To train these two networks, the Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation technique was used. In the input and hidden layers, sigmoid activation functions are utilized, while purelin is used in the output layer. Simulation results demonstrated the efficacy and benefit of the DC motor control system based on ANNs. In [13], an ANN-based controller is recommended to replace traditional PID controllers to increase the drive’s performance. The controller was trained and applied for a speed controller. To evaluate the controller’s performance, it was placed within the feed-forward backpropagation algorithm. To test the network’s performance, a multilayer feed-forward backpropagation technique is used to train it. A forward feedback network is a neural network based on the BP algorithm. This network simply has a large number of neurons with minimal processing characteristics, and their combination results in a network with complicated nonlinear mapping capability and no feedback, indicating that it is not a nonlinear dynamic system but rather a nonlinear mapping. However, it has important implications due to its theoretical integrity and vast applicability, but it also has the following issues: the BP algorithm converges in the direction of the mean square error gradient descent, but the gradient curve of the mean square error has many local and global minimums, making it easy for the neural network to fall into local minimums; the BP learning algorithm convergence rate is slow, taking a lot of time, and the network generalization is poor [14]. To solve these issues, it is necessary to improve the basic BP algorithm to increase the convergence speed and thus achieve optimization.This study combines the BP network adaptive control and the PID control to find the optimal KP, KI, and KD nonlinear coupling law, improve online tuning, optimize PID controller performance, and finally improve the control of AC asynchronous motors in vector control systems. A simulation model for the AC motor speed regulation system is established and tested using the MATLAB program. Results showed that this control scheme has strong adaptability and robustness when the controlled object is unknown or the parameters change.The rest of the manuscript is organized as follows: Section2 provides a detailed disruption of the proposed motor control method. Section 3 illustrates the PID controller design of the BP-NN. In Section 4, different simulation results are presented and Section 5 concludes the manuscript.


## 2. Proposed Method

### 2.1. Modeling BP-NN PID Controller

BP-NNs are the most representative and most commonly used models of current neural network learning models. They approximate a multilayered multivariate function by synthesizing multiple elements [15]. Therefore, feed-forward networks can represent nonlinear functions, acquire control system parameters through online learning and training, and achieve the optimal combination of PID control signal outputs. A PID controller based on a BP network is established, which comprises two parts: a traditional PID controller and a BP-NN regulator. Figure 1 shows the structure of the control system.Figure 1
BP network PID controller.Among them, the conventional PID controller directly executes the closed-loop control of the AC motor and appropriately adjusts the three-parameter values of the proportional gain (kp), integrated gain (ki), and differential gain (kd). By doing so, it stabilizes the system (differential gain) and meets system specifications and performance requirements. Neural networks can reach a predetermined convergence range by self-learning and self-adjusting the weighting factors and minimizing the error between the target output and the estimated output, depending on the online operating state of the system.The output of the layer corresponds to the output of the three adaptable parameters kp, ki, and kd of the PID controller using the optimal control law [15]. Suppose the BP neural network is a three-layer BP network and its structure is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
BP network structure diagram.The incremental digital PID control algorithm is represented using(1)ut=ut−1+#ut,where #ut=kpet−et−1+kiet+kdet−2et−1+et−2.To fully reflect the characteristics of the input PID controller signal that controls the AC asynchronous motor, the number of neurons in the input layer is selected as 3.ut represents the input of the controlled object at time t, x1=ek is the amount of signal error feedback from the input signal utand the system output youtk at time k, x2=$i=1kek. To reflect the effect of error accumulation, x1=ek−ek−1, the rate of change of error, which can reflect the speed of error change.The input of the BP neural network input layer node is(2)oj1=xj,j=1,2,…,M.The input/output of the hidden layer are(3)neti2t=∑j=1Mωij2oj1koj2t=fneti2k,i=1,2,⋅⋅⋅,q,where the superscripts (1), (2), and (3) denote the input, hidden, and output layers, respectively. ωij2 is the weight value of the hidden layer. The transfer function of the neurons in the hidden layer here selects the most commonly used double-curved sigmoid function:(4)fx=tanhx=ex−e−xex+e−x.The input and output of the network output layer are(5)neti3k=∑i=1Qωij3oi2koi3k=gneti3k,i=1,2,3,where ωij3 is the weight coefficient of the output layer and the output is defined as(6)o13k=kp,o23k=ki,o33k=kd.Because the PID control is generally positive numbers, the excitation functiongx of the output layer neurons selects the non-negative double-curved sigmoid function and its definition is(7)gx=121+tanhx=exex+e−x.The designed controller uses a real-time training algorithm. From the start of operation of the motor to the steady state to the braking process, the real-time self-tuning network; that is, the set speed of the motor and the actual feedback of the motor speed loop are always sampled. Speed errors are used for network training, weights, and deviations for the entire control system are network convergent, and PID controller parameters are always optimal for the entire process. Therefore, the performance index function is represented as(8)Ek=12rink−youtk2.The process of backpropagation of network errors and weight factor adjustment adds a momentum term when the weight factor values are adjusted to accelerate the BP network and converge to local extrema as soon as possible.(9)Δωli3k=−η∂Ek∂ωli3+αΔωli3k−1.where αΔωli3k−1 is the global minimum inertia term, η is the learning rate, α is the inertia factor, and its value is between 0 and 1.(10)∂Ek∂ωli3=∂Ek∂yk⋅∂yk∂uk⋅∂uk∂o3k⋅∂o3∂netl3⋅∂netl3k∂oli3⋅∂netl3k∂oli3=∂oli3k.Analysis reveals that the controlled AC asynchronous motor is a high-order multivariable system with nonlinearity and strong coupling [16]. Since the sensitivity of the controlled object ∂yk/∂uk is not easily obtained, the symbolic function sgn is selected in the simulation. However, the sgn∂yk/∂uk instead of the ∂yk/∂uk vector control can affect control loop disturbances caused by environmental changes, and loads during motor operation. Next, we wait for the change sensitivity of the change and the change of the parameter to decrease. When the motor parameters fluctuate significantly (for example, when the moment of inertia J increases or decreases by a factor of 10), the motor’s PID controller can adjust the combination of proportional integration and differential online for high-performance control.In this way, the BP-NN PID controller can be independent of the system and has universal applicability. The error effect caused by replacing∂yk/∂uk by sgn∂yk/∂uk can be compensated by adjusting the learning rate. From the above equations, we can derive(11)∂uk∂o13k=ek−ek−1,∂uk∂o23k=ek,∂uk∂o33k=ek−2ek−1+ek−2.After the above analysis, the weight coefficient of the output layer can be derived and the learning algorithm is represented as(12)Δωli3k=αΔωli3k−1+ηδl3ol2k.(13)δl3=eksgn∂yk∂uk∂uk∂ol3kg′netl3,l=1,2,3.Similarly, the weight coefficient learning algorithm of the hidden layer is expressed as(14)Δωij2k=∂ωij2k−1+ηδi2oj2k,(15)δi2=f′neti2∑l=13δl3ωli3k,i=1,2,…Q,where g′⋅=gx1−gx,f′⋅=1−f2x/2.


### 2.2. Introduction of Momentum Factor to Improve the Adaptive Learning Algorithm for the BP-NN

The BP-NN has the advantages of high learning accuracy and the fast feedback speed [17, 18]. It has advanced impure mapping capabilities and can replace nonlinear equation solving and other complex calculations. The learning process of the BP-NN consists of forwarding propagation of the signal and reverse propagation of the error. To improve the vibration of the learning process and accelerate the convergence speed, the adaptive learning rate method and the momentum method were introduced.


#### 2.2.1. Momentum Method

The purpose of introducing the momentum factorα is to have the network added a specific percentage of the previous weight value modification to each weight value change and add a damping term to reduce process vibration when modifying the weight values. Mathematically, it can be represented as(16)Δωij=η∂E/∂ωij+αΔωijt−1.


#### 2.2.2. Adaptive Learning Rate Method

The BP-NN algorithm uses gradient subtraction in the learning and training process and has problems such as slow convergence [18]. To overcome these problems, a method of automatically adjusting the learning rate is adopted and the algorithm can be described by the following iterative expression:(17)ηk+1=1.05+ηkEk+1<Ek,0.7×ηkEk+1≥Ek,ηkothers,where Ek and Ek+1 represent the sum of squared errors after the kth and (k + 1)th learning and training, respectively. If Ek+1<Ek, it means that the kth weight value correction is effective and the learning rate is increased. If Ek+1≥Ek, it means that the kth weight value correction is invalid; the decrement factor to reduce the learning rate is multiplied by it, thereby reducing invalid iterations and speeding up the network learning speed.


## 2.1. Modeling BP-NN PID Controller

BP-NNs are the most representative and most commonly used models of current neural network learning models. They approximate a multilayered multivariate function by synthesizing multiple elements [15]. Therefore, feed-forward networks can represent nonlinear functions, acquire control system parameters through online learning and training, and achieve the optimal combination of PID control signal outputs. A PID controller based on a BP network is established, which comprises two parts: a traditional PID controller and a BP-NN regulator. Figure 1 shows the structure of the control system.Figure 1
BP network PID controller.Among them, the conventional PID controller directly executes the closed-loop control of the AC motor and appropriately adjusts the three-parameter values of the proportional gain (kp), integrated gain (ki), and differential gain (kd). By doing so, it stabilizes the system (differential gain) and meets system specifications and performance requirements. Neural networks can reach a predetermined convergence range by self-learning and self-adjusting the weighting factors and minimizing the error between the target output and the estimated output, depending on the online operating state of the system.The output of the layer corresponds to the output of the three adaptable parameters kp, ki, and kd of the PID controller using the optimal control law [15]. Suppose the BP neural network is a three-layer BP network and its structure is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
BP network structure diagram.The incremental digital PID control algorithm is represented using(1)ut=ut−1+#ut,where #ut=kpet−et−1+kiet+kdet−2et−1+et−2.To fully reflect the characteristics of the input PID controller signal that controls the AC asynchronous motor, the number of neurons in the input layer is selected as 3.ut represents the input of the controlled object at time t, x1=ek is the amount of signal error feedback from the input signal utand the system output youtk at time k, x2=$i=1kek. To reflect the effect of error accumulation, x1=ek−ek−1, the rate of change of error, which can reflect the speed of error change.The input of the BP neural network input layer node is(2)oj1=xj,j=1,2,…,M.The input/output of the hidden layer are(3)neti2t=∑j=1Mωij2oj1koj2t=fneti2k,i=1,2,⋅⋅⋅,q,where the superscripts (1), (2), and (3) denote the input, hidden, and output layers, respectively. ωij2 is the weight value of the hidden layer. The transfer function of the neurons in the hidden layer here selects the most commonly used double-curved sigmoid function:(4)fx=tanhx=ex−e−xex+e−x.The input and output of the network output layer are(5)neti3k=∑i=1Qωij3oi2koi3k=gneti3k,i=1,2,3,where ωij3 is the weight coefficient of the output layer and the output is defined as(6)o13k=kp,o23k=ki,o33k=kd.Because the PID control is generally positive numbers, the excitation functiongx of the output layer neurons selects the non-negative double-curved sigmoid function and its definition is(7)gx=121+tanhx=exex+e−x.The designed controller uses a real-time training algorithm. From the start of operation of the motor to the steady state to the braking process, the real-time self-tuning network; that is, the set speed of the motor and the actual feedback of the motor speed loop are always sampled. Speed errors are used for network training, weights, and deviations for the entire control system are network convergent, and PID controller parameters are always optimal for the entire process. Therefore, the performance index function is represented as(8)Ek=12rink−youtk2.The process of backpropagation of network errors and weight factor adjustment adds a momentum term when the weight factor values are adjusted to accelerate the BP network and converge to local extrema as soon as possible.(9)Δωli3k=−η∂Ek∂ωli3+αΔωli3k−1.where αΔωli3k−1 is the global minimum inertia term, η is the learning rate, α is the inertia factor, and its value is between 0 and 1.(10)∂Ek∂ωli3=∂Ek∂yk⋅∂yk∂uk⋅∂uk∂o3k⋅∂o3∂netl3⋅∂netl3k∂oli3⋅∂netl3k∂oli3=∂oli3k.Analysis reveals that the controlled AC asynchronous motor is a high-order multivariable system with nonlinearity and strong coupling [16]. Since the sensitivity of the controlled object ∂yk/∂uk is not easily obtained, the symbolic function sgn is selected in the simulation. However, the sgn∂yk/∂uk instead of the ∂yk/∂uk vector control can affect control loop disturbances caused by environmental changes, and loads during motor operation. Next, we wait for the change sensitivity of the change and the change of the parameter to decrease. When the motor parameters fluctuate significantly (for example, when the moment of inertia J increases or decreases by a factor of 10), the motor’s PID controller can adjust the combination of proportional integration and differential online for high-performance control.In this way, the BP-NN PID controller can be independent of the system and has universal applicability. The error effect caused by replacing∂yk/∂uk by sgn∂yk/∂uk can be compensated by adjusting the learning rate. From the above equations, we can derive(11)∂uk∂o13k=ek−ek−1,∂uk∂o23k=ek,∂uk∂o33k=ek−2ek−1+ek−2.After the above analysis, the weight coefficient of the output layer can be derived and the learning algorithm is represented as(12)Δωli3k=αΔωli3k−1+ηδl3ol2k.(13)δl3=eksgn∂yk∂uk∂uk∂ol3kg′netl3,l=1,2,3.Similarly, the weight coefficient learning algorithm of the hidden layer is expressed as(14)Δωij2k=∂ωij2k−1+ηδi2oj2k,(15)δi2=f′neti2∑l=13δl3ωli3k,i=1,2,…Q,where g′⋅=gx1−gx,f′⋅=1−f2x/2.


## 2.2. Introduction of Momentum Factor to Improve the Adaptive Learning Algorithm for the BP-NN

The BP-NN has the advantages of high learning accuracy and the fast feedback speed [17, 18]. It has advanced impure mapping capabilities and can replace nonlinear equation solving and other complex calculations. The learning process of the BP-NN consists of forwarding propagation of the signal and reverse propagation of the error. To improve the vibration of the learning process and accelerate the convergence speed, the adaptive learning rate method and the momentum method were introduced.


### 2.2.1. Momentum Method

The purpose of introducing the momentum factorα is to have the network added a specific percentage of the previous weight value modification to each weight value change and add a damping term to reduce process vibration when modifying the weight values. Mathematically, it can be represented as(16)Δωij=η∂E/∂ωij+αΔωijt−1.


### 2.2.2. Adaptive Learning Rate Method

The BP-NN algorithm uses gradient subtraction in the learning and training process and has problems such as slow convergence [18]. To overcome these problems, a method of automatically adjusting the learning rate is adopted and the algorithm can be described by the following iterative expression:(17)ηk+1=1.05+ηkEk+1<Ek,0.7×ηkEk+1≥Ek,ηkothers,where Ek and Ek+1 represent the sum of squared errors after the kth and (k + 1)th learning and training, respectively. If Ek+1<Ek, it means that the kth weight value correction is effective and the learning rate is increased. If Ek+1≥Ek, it means that the kth weight value correction is invalid; the decrement factor to reduce the learning rate is multiplied by it, thereby reducing invalid iterations and speeding up the network learning speed.


## 2.2.1. Momentum Method

The purpose of introducing the momentum factorα is to have the network added a specific percentage of the previous weight value modification to each weight value change and add a damping term to reduce process vibration when modifying the weight values. Mathematically, it can be represented as(16)Δωij=η∂E/∂ωij+αΔωijt−1.


## 2.2.2. Adaptive Learning Rate Method

The BP-NN algorithm uses gradient subtraction in the learning and training process and has problems such as slow convergence [18]. To overcome these problems, a method of automatically adjusting the learning rate is adopted and the algorithm can be described by the following iterative expression:(17)ηk+1=1.05+ηkEk+1<Ek,0.7×ηkEk+1≥Ek,ηkothers,where Ek and Ek+1 represent the sum of squared errors after the kth and (k + 1)th learning and training, respectively. If Ek+1<Ek, it means that the kth weight value correction is effective and the learning rate is increased. If Ek+1≥Ek, it means that the kth weight value correction is invalid; the decrement factor to reduce the learning rate is multiplied by it, thereby reducing invalid iterations and speeding up the network learning speed.


## 3. PID Controller Design of the BP-NN

Introducing the method of the combining momentum factor and adaptive learning rate, the online learning rate of the BP algorithm has been well controlled. Synthesizing the abovementioned derivation equation, the adaptive artificial neural network PID controller can be designed using the following algorithm:(i)
Select the number of nodes in the input layer as 3, setk = 1, and set the initial value of the weight value of each layer, the learning rate η, and the inertia factor α(ii)
Perform sampling to obtain the set speed rin(k) and the speed loop feedback speed yout(k) of the motor at the current moment and calculate the change of the weight value and the deviation value at that moment(iii)
Compute the weights of each layer of the BP-NN. The three output variables of the NN output layer are the three adjustable parameterskp, ki, and kd of the PID controller(iv)
Using the following equation,uk=uk−1+kpk−+kidk+kdek−2ek−1+ek−2, calculate the PID controller output u (k)(v)
Perform neural network learning and adjust the weight coefficients of each layer online using equations (12)–(15) to realize the adaptive adjustment of PID speed controller parameters(vi)
Setk = k + 1 and return to step (1) until the error meets the requirements


## 4. System Simulation and Result Analysis

The simulation platform for an AC asynchronous motor vector control system consists of four submodules. Figure3 depicts the architecture of the proposed system. Immemo is an asynchronous motor model, and the controller is a controller module and the sampling period is 100 μs. We used the SVP-WM control strategy to control the current and velocity. The comparison is an inverter drive module and an inverter switch. The signal is acquired by comparing the input comparison value with the triangle wave. The inverter is an inverter module. By switching the signal, the inverter output acquires the three-phase AC voltage required for the motor and the bus voltage is kept constant at 540 V.Figure 3
Simulation platform of the AC asynchronous motor vector control system.The rotor field-oriented control system is constructed using the Matlab/Simulink platform. The parameters of the motor used in the simulation are shown in Table1.Table 1
Motor parameters.
ParameterValueRated voltage VN380 VRated current IN15 ARated power PN5.8 kWRated speed nN1430 r/minExcitation inductance Lm0.1024 HRotor resistance Rr0.531 ΩRotor inductance Lr0.1088 HStator resistance Rs0.813 ΩStator electric sense Ls0.1063 HMoment of inertia J0.02 kg•m2For the variable parameter motor model, the BP-NN PID controller, the BP-PID controller, and the traditional PID controller when the motor is loaded and running, the simulation effect is compared and analyzed; the improved momentum factor is introduced into the adaptive BP-NN PID controller.


### 4.1. Comparison of the Control Effect between the Traditional PID and BP-NN PID Control of the Variable Parameter Motor Model

This experiment shows that the moment of inertia of the motor in the vector control system (J = 0.2/0.02/0.002) changes when it is controlled by the traditional PID controller and the BP-NN PID controller, respectively, during the startup process. We compared the speed response curve and observed the adaptive change process of the parameters of the BP controller during the startup process. The motor is started at 0.1 s, and the set speed is 1500 rad/min. The simulation details are explained in the following sections.


#### 4.1.1. Comparison of the Control Effect of the Moment of Inertia atJ = 0.02

WhenJ = 0.02, the control effect of the motor is shown in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. It is obvious that the traditional PID controllers have essentially no overshoot after making multiple adjustments, the system response time is very short, and the load is relatively low. This shows that the ideal control effect can be achieved, and the disturbances have little effect on the system.Figure 4
The traditional PID control effect whenJ = 0.02.Figure 5
The BP-NN PID control effect whenJ = 0.02.Controlling the same system using the BP-NN PID controller also has a good control effect as shown in Figure6. The overshoot is within control and does not exceed 3%. Moreover, it has a short rise time and does not have a large load disturbance. The control effect of the BP-NN PID controller is not as good as that of the PID controller, but it also shows the characteristics of the low overshoot, the fast convergence speed, and a low response to disturbance.Figure 6
BP-PID controller outputi.


#### 4.1.2. Divergence of the Control Effect When the Moment of Inertia atJ = 0.2

This set of simulations is performed under the condition that the moment of inertiaJ of the motor is increased by 10 times without changing any other parameters. Figures 7(a)–7(d) show the simulation results. A group of PID controller parameters has an excellent control effect when the rotational inertia J = 0.02, but the control effect, in this case, is very unsatisfactory. Compared with the BP-NN control, not only the rise time is much longer, and it takes relatively a long time to enter the steady state, but also the influence of load disturbance is great after entering the steady state and there is an obvious overshoot. In contrast, the control effect of the BP-NN PID controller is obvious and the overshoot is stable at the same state as the moment of inertia J = 0.02. Similarly, after the system enters the steady-state operation, the anti-interference ability to load disturbance is very strong.Figure 7
Motor control effects are based on traditional PID and BP-NN PID-based controllers. (a)J = 0.2 traditional PID control effect. (b) The traditional PID control oscillates after entering the steady state. (c) The BP neural network PID control effect when J = 0.2. (d) The BP neural network after the PID control enters the steady state.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


### 4.2. Testing the Control Effect of the Improved BP-NN PID Controller

To test the control effect of the improved BP-NN controller, the simulation test environment was kept unchanged. With the introduction of the momentum factor in the adaptive BP-NN PID controller, the comparison results before and after the improvements are shown in Figures8 and 9, respectively.Figure 8
Improved BP network PID control speed simulation effect.Figure 9
Improved BP network PID control speed simulation effect.It can be seen that the overshoot of the control system is close to zero, and at the same time, the response speed of the system is significantly improved; load disturbance has almost no effect on the operating speed. Similarly, during the ascent process, the improved controller has a more sensitive response to environmental changes and can respond quickly to small changes in error. This also shows that the size of iq can only be between [−30, 30], and its rise time and overshoot are affected by the amplitude limiter. If the rise time is required to be close to the steady state, then it is essential to keep the current iq = 30 during the rising process. When speed is close to the given speed, then it is necessary to quickly adjust the output current iq of the motor speed loop PID controller to reduce the overshoot and make the system stable. Comparing the rotational speed simulation results of the two control algorithms, it can be seen that the improved BP-NN PID control system can quickly and accurately respond to the error signal.


## 4.1. Comparison of the Control Effect between the Traditional PID and BP-NN PID Control of the Variable Parameter Motor Model

This experiment shows that the moment of inertia of the motor in the vector control system (J = 0.2/0.02/0.002) changes when it is controlled by the traditional PID controller and the BP-NN PID controller, respectively, during the startup process. We compared the speed response curve and observed the adaptive change process of the parameters of the BP controller during the startup process. The motor is started at 0.1 s, and the set speed is 1500 rad/min. The simulation details are explained in the following sections.


### 4.1.1. Comparison of the Control Effect of the Moment of Inertia atJ = 0.02

WhenJ = 0.02, the control effect of the motor is shown in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. It is obvious that the traditional PID controllers have essentially no overshoot after making multiple adjustments, the system response time is very short, and the load is relatively low. This shows that the ideal control effect can be achieved, and the disturbances have little effect on the system.Figure 4
The traditional PID control effect whenJ = 0.02.Figure 5
The BP-NN PID control effect whenJ = 0.02.Controlling the same system using the BP-NN PID controller also has a good control effect as shown in Figure6. The overshoot is within control and does not exceed 3%. Moreover, it has a short rise time and does not have a large load disturbance. The control effect of the BP-NN PID controller is not as good as that of the PID controller, but it also shows the characteristics of the low overshoot, the fast convergence speed, and a low response to disturbance.Figure 6
BP-PID controller outputi.


### 4.1.2. Divergence of the Control Effect When the Moment of Inertia atJ = 0.2

This set of simulations is performed under the condition that the moment of inertiaJ of the motor is increased by 10 times without changing any other parameters. Figures 7(a)–7(d) show the simulation results. A group of PID controller parameters has an excellent control effect when the rotational inertia J = 0.02, but the control effect, in this case, is very unsatisfactory. Compared with the BP-NN control, not only the rise time is much longer, and it takes relatively a long time to enter the steady state, but also the influence of load disturbance is great after entering the steady state and there is an obvious overshoot. In contrast, the control effect of the BP-NN PID controller is obvious and the overshoot is stable at the same state as the moment of inertia J = 0.02. Similarly, after the system enters the steady-state operation, the anti-interference ability to load disturbance is very strong.Figure 7
Motor control effects are based on traditional PID and BP-NN PID-based controllers. (a)J = 0.2 traditional PID control effect. (b) The traditional PID control oscillates after entering the steady state. (c) The BP neural network PID control effect when J = 0.2. (d) The BP neural network after the PID control enters the steady state.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 4.1.1. Comparison of the Control Effect of the Moment of Inertia atJ = 0.02

WhenJ = 0.02, the control effect of the motor is shown in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. It is obvious that the traditional PID controllers have essentially no overshoot after making multiple adjustments, the system response time is very short, and the load is relatively low. This shows that the ideal control effect can be achieved, and the disturbances have little effect on the system.Figure 4
The traditional PID control effect whenJ = 0.02.Figure 5
The BP-NN PID control effect whenJ = 0.02.Controlling the same system using the BP-NN PID controller also has a good control effect as shown in Figure6. The overshoot is within control and does not exceed 3%. Moreover, it has a short rise time and does not have a large load disturbance. The control effect of the BP-NN PID controller is not as good as that of the PID controller, but it also shows the characteristics of the low overshoot, the fast convergence speed, and a low response to disturbance.Figure 6
BP-PID controller outputi.


## 4.1.2. Divergence of the Control Effect When the Moment of Inertia atJ = 0.2

This set of simulations is performed under the condition that the moment of inertiaJ of the motor is increased by 10 times without changing any other parameters. Figures 7(a)–7(d) show the simulation results. A group of PID controller parameters has an excellent control effect when the rotational inertia J = 0.02, but the control effect, in this case, is very unsatisfactory. Compared with the BP-NN control, not only the rise time is much longer, and it takes relatively a long time to enter the steady state, but also the influence of load disturbance is great after entering the steady state and there is an obvious overshoot. In contrast, the control effect of the BP-NN PID controller is obvious and the overshoot is stable at the same state as the moment of inertia J = 0.02. Similarly, after the system enters the steady-state operation, the anti-interference ability to load disturbance is very strong.Figure 7
Motor control effects are based on traditional PID and BP-NN PID-based controllers. (a)J = 0.2 traditional PID control effect. (b) The traditional PID control oscillates after entering the steady state. (c) The BP neural network PID control effect when J = 0.2. (d) The BP neural network after the PID control enters the steady state.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 4.2. Testing the Control Effect of the Improved BP-NN PID Controller

To test the control effect of the improved BP-NN controller, the simulation test environment was kept unchanged. With the introduction of the momentum factor in the adaptive BP-NN PID controller, the comparison results before and after the improvements are shown in Figures8 and 9, respectively.Figure 8
Improved BP network PID control speed simulation effect.Figure 9
Improved BP network PID control speed simulation effect.It can be seen that the overshoot of the control system is close to zero, and at the same time, the response speed of the system is significantly improved; load disturbance has almost no effect on the operating speed. Similarly, during the ascent process, the improved controller has a more sensitive response to environmental changes and can respond quickly to small changes in error. This also shows that the size of iq can only be between [−30, 30], and its rise time and overshoot are affected by the amplitude limiter. If the rise time is required to be close to the steady state, then it is essential to keep the current iq = 30 during the rising process. When speed is close to the given speed, then it is necessary to quickly adjust the output current iq of the motor speed loop PID controller to reduce the overshoot and make the system stable. Comparing the rotational speed simulation results of the two control algorithms, it can be seen that the improved BP-NN PID control system can quickly and accurately respond to the error signal.


## 5. Conclusion

Artificial intelligence and machine learning appear as exciting alternatives to control the AC motor and satisfy the desired requirements. In this study, the BP-NN PID based on the momentum factor adaptive learning rate method is applied to the speed loop PID controller in the vector control of AC asynchronous motors. Simulation results show that the improved method not only establishes an accurate mathematical model for controlling the AC motor speed but also can adjust the input and output signals of PID controller parameters online. The model shows excellent performance as compared to the traditional controllers and provides a good control effect even when the parameters have changed greatly. Therefore, the control strategy of the improved BP-NN PID controller has higher practicability in engineering applications.



---

*Source: 1590779-2022-06-02.xml*