# Renovation and Reuse of Reactive Dyeing Effluent by a Novel Heterogeneous Fenton System Based on Metal Modified PTFE Fibrous Catalyst/H2O2

Authors: Bing Li; Yongchun Dong; Zhizhong Ding; Yiming Xu; Chi Zou
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Cu-Fe bimetallic grafted polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) fiber complexes were prepared and optimized as the novel heterogeneous Fenton catalysts for the degradation of reactive dyes under UV irradiation. Cotton fabrics were dyed with three reactive dyes, namely, Reactive Red 195, Reactive Yellow 145, and Reactive Blue 222, in tap fresh water using exhaustion process. The spent dyeing effluents were then collected and degraded with the optimized Cu-Fe bimetallic grafted PTFE fiber complex/H2O2 system. The treated dyeing effluents were characterized and reused for the dyeing of cotton fabrics through the same process. The effect of reuse process number on quality of the dyed cotton fabrics was examined. The results indicated that the Cu-Fe bimetallic modified PTFE fiber complex with a Cu/Fe molar ratio of 2.87 was found to be the most effective fibrous catalyst, which enhanced complete decolorization of the treated dyeing effluents with H2O2 in 4 h. However, the TOC removal for the treated dyeing effluents was below 80%. The dyeing quality was not affected for three successive cycles. The increase in residual TOC value influences fourth dyeing cycle. Further TOC reduction of the treated effluents is needed for its repeated reuse in more than three dyeing cycles.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Textile dyeing is a significant consumer of water and producer of contaminated aqueous waste streams because textile dyeing processes are generally conducted in water-based dyeing baths and the dyeing processes require the addition of colorants and inorganic salts as dyeing promoter or retardant. In a typical dyeing factory, about 0.2–0.5 m3 of water is needed to produce 1 kg of finished textiles [1]. Dyeing wastewaters are known to present strong color and high COD values since more than 15% of the textile dyes are generally lost in wastewater stream during dyeing operation. It is a well-known fact that reactive dyes have become one of the major classes of colorants for dyeing of cellulose fiber because over 50% of cotton products are colored with reactive dyes. Besides, a large amount of salt is usually required when the cellulose fiber is dyed with reactive dyes, which have been one source of pollutant in dyeing wastewater. Moreover, the reactive dye-containing effluent is often persistent and recalcitrant to microbial degradation. In recent years, the increasing cost of water and wastewater treatment as well as government’s tighter restrictions on wastewater discharges is forcing textile processors to reuse process water. A better alternative is an attempt at renovating the dyeing wastewater for reuse. Some works have been carried out to examine the possibility of recycling dyeing effluents after decoloration using ozonation, electrochemistry, or Fenton process [2–13]. Ozone has been often used as an effective oxidant for decoloration and reuse of the dyebath water, which can be recycled in reactive or acid dyeing process [2–5]. However, the dyeing quality was sometimes affected by the reuse of decolorized dyebath water, possibly because the corresponding removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) was not significant [2]. The electrochemical treatment was also used to decolorize the exhausted reactive dyebath and washing effluents, the reuse of which provided excellent red and yellow dyeing textiles [6, 7]. The oxidation technologies based on ZnO [8] and K2FeO4 [9] were applied for dyebath water treatment and recycle. Fenton and photoassisted Fenton technologies as the important advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been widely applied in textile wastewater treatments. But drawbacks in the use of Fenton reactions are found to be the limitation of pH value and the problem of separation and regeneration at the end of the reaction [10, 11]. Moreover, Fenton and photoassisted Fenton technologies generally combined with biological processes for textile wastewater treatment and reuse [12, 13] and thus, led to higher treating cost. In recent years, the active heterogeneous Fenton catalysis is gradually replacing the homogeneous system by immobilized Fe ions on the polymer substrates. Fe (III)-fiber complexes represent a kind of promising heterogeneous catalysts with unique properties, such as lower cost, easy separation, large surface area, suitable chemical and mechanical stability as well as convenient utility [14–16]. However, very little research has been focused on the treatment and reuse of dyeing wastewater using a heterogeneous Fenton reaction system. The detailed information about the impact of recycling on quality of the dyed fabric is rare for this treating process. In this approach, a series of Cu-Fe bimetallic grafted polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) fiber complexes was prepared and investigated as the effective heterogeneous Fenton catalysts for renovating and recycling reactive dye effluents for dyeing of cotton fabric. This is because PTFE fiber as the support material has advantages including large specific surface area, excellent chemical and mechanical stability, easy handling, and convenient utility in various forms [17]. Three reactive dyes containing multireactive groups were used for coloration of cotton fabrics by an exhaustion process, due mainly to its relatively high consumption rate in China for the dyeing of cotton textiles.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials and Reagents

Commercially scoured, bleached, and mercerized cotton woven fabric was used in this study. This fabric was further treated with a solution containing 2.0 gL−1 Na2CO3 and 2.0 gL−1 soap at the boil for 30 minutes, then thoroughly washed with cold water and dried at ambient temperature. The commercial PTFE fibers were purchased from Fuxin Sengfuli Polymer Materials Co., China. Acrylic acid, FeCl3·6H2O, CuSO4·5H2O, H2O2 (30%, w/w), Na2SO4, and Na2CO3 were of analytical grade and all purchased from the Tianjin Nankai Chemicals Co., China. Three commercial grade reactive dyes including Reactive Red 195 (RR 195), Reactive Yellow 145 (RY 145), and Reactive Blue 222 (RB 222) were supplied by Tianjin Sanhuan Chemical Co., China. These dyes were not purified prior to use. Their molecular structures are presented in Scheme 1.Scheme 1
Chemical structures of the three dyes.


### 2.2. Reactive Dyeing Procedure

A laboratory dyeing machine with 12 stainless steel dyeing tubes of 500 mL capacity was used for dyeing. Known weight of pretreated cotton fabric was dyed at 3.0% shade on weight of fabric (owf) with the dyes selected using a fabric/liquor ratio of 1 : 50 at 60°C for 40 min. Dye bath consisted of necessary quantity of reactive dye, 40.0 gL−1 Na2SO4, and tap fresh water. After dyeing, the fixation of the adsorbed dye on cotton fabric was conducted at 60°C for 30 min by adding Na2CO3 into the dyeing bath. The dyed fabric was then removed from the dye bath and squeezed to fall back in the bath itself. Afterwards, the dyed fabrics were rinsed thoroughly using water at the boil for 15 min and air dried. Finally, the rinsing effluent was collected and mixed with the exhausted dyebath water to form the dyeing wastewater.


### 2.3. Preparation of Metal Modified PTFE Fibrous Catalysts

#### 2.3.1. Graft Polymerization of PTFE Fibers

According to the literatures [18], 5.0 g of the dried PTFE fibers was immersed into the monomer solution containing 50 mL acrylic acid and 100 mL deionized water in a 250 mL flask. Ammonium ferrous sulphate (3.0 wt%) was also used in the monomer solution to minimize the homopolymerization of acrylic acid during the reaction. The flask containing the monomer solution and fibers was bubbled with nitrogen to remove oxygen and was sealed. The mixture in the flask was directly subjected to gamma rays of irradiation from a 60Co source at a dose rate of 0.5 kGyh−1 for the given time. After irradiation, the grafted PTFE fibers (denoted as PAA-g-PTFE) were taken out, washed with hot water and acetone repeatedly and dried in a vacuum oven at 50°C for 24 h, and weighed. The grafting degree of PTFE fibers was determined by the percentage increase in weight to be 36.48%.


#### 2.3.2. Metal PAA-g-PTFE Complexes

Five grams of PAA-g-PTFE was placed into 150 mL of mixed metal salt aqueous solutions of FeCl3 and CuSO4. In all cases, the concentrations of the total metal ions were kept constant at 0.10 molL−1. The mixture was then treated at 50°C and pH 2-3 for the given time under continuous agitation. The resulting fibrous metal complexes were filtered, washed with deionized water, and dried under vacuum at 60°C for 4.0 h to obtain Fe grafted PTFE fiber complex (denoted as Fe-PAA-g-PTFE), Cu grafted PTFE fiber complex (denoted as Cu-PAA-g-PTFE), and Cu-Fe bimetal grafted PTFE fiber complex (Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE). The residual concentrations of Fe (III) and Cu (II) ions in the solutions after coordination were determined using a WXF120 atomic absorption spectrometry (Beijing Rayleigh Analytical Instrument Corp., China) for calculating the Fe content (QFe) and Cu content (QCu) of the complexes, respectively.


### 2.4. Treatment and Recycle of Dyeing Effluent

The treating system of dyeing effluent included filtration, degradation, and active carbon fiber adsorption units. The dyeing effluent was firstly filtrated to remove the fiber tows for obtaining a better degradation. The dyeing effluent was degraded at room temperature for the given time using a photoreaction system consist mainly of chamber, UV lamp (400 W, 365 nm), electromagnetic valve, relay, water bath, and reaction vessels. The schematic diagram of the photoreaction system was presented in our previous works [14, 16]. PAA-g-PTFE complex was firstly fixed on small glass rack and then placed into the mixing solution of dyeing effluent and H2O2 in reaction vessels. The pH of the solution was adjusted with 0.10 mmolL−1 HNO3 and/or NaOH aqueous solution and measured using DHS-25C digital pH meter (Shanghai Jingmi Instrumental Co., China). Afterwards, the treated dyeing effluent was further purified by the active carbon fibers (BET specific surface area: 800–2000 m2g−1) and then characterized for pH value, electric conductivity, color, and total organic carbon (TOC) value according to standard methods. Color of the dyeing effluent was determined by the absorbance measurements using UV-2401 Shimadzu spectrophotometer at the λmax of each dye or 500 nm for the real dyeing effluent. The decoloration percentage of the dye was expressed using
(1)D%=C0-CC0×100%,
where C0 and C are the initial and residual concentrations of the dye (mgL−1), respectively. Meanwhile, TOC value was measured in the process using a Phoenix 8000 TOC analyzer (Tekmar-Dehrmann Inc., USA), and the TOC removal percentage of the dye was calculated by
(2)TOCremoval(%)=TOC0-TOCtTOC0×100%,
where TOC0 and TOCt are the TOC values (mgL−1) at reaction times 0 and t, respectively. When the treated effluents were reused, the same dyeing procedure given above was employed through adjusting the concentration of sodium sulfate to 40.0 gL−1 in the dyeing bath, and the dyed samples were assessed for their quality. A schematic of the methodology for degradation and reuse of reactive dyeing effluent is depicted in Figure 1.Figure 1
Schematic of degradation and reuse processes of reactive dyeing effluent.


### 2.5. Evaluation of Dyed Cotton Fabrics

Color strength (K/S) of the dyed fabric was established with the aid of Kubelka-Munk equation:
(3)KS=(1-R)22R,
where R = fraction of light reflected, K = absorption coefficient, and S = scattering coefficient.A Datacolor International SF-600 spectrophotometer interfaced to a personal computer under D65 illuminant, using a 10° standard observer, was used to measureK/S values. The wavelength measured ranged from 400 to 700 nm with an interval of 10 nm. The greater the K/S value, the greater the coloration of the fabric sample. Then a K/S change percentage (K/Smax%) was calculated through
(4)K/Smax%=K/Smax-2-K/Smax-1K/Smax-1×100%,
where K/Smax-1 and K/Smax-2 are K/S values at the λmax of the dyed fabric using tap fresh water and the treated dyeing effluent, respectively. Moreover, the effect of recycling of treated dyeing water on color reproduction and lightness on cotton fabric was also analyzed using DE* and DL* values, respectively, calculated with the help of CIE L*, a*, and b* (CIELAB) equations. Level dyeing property of the dyed cotton fabric was evaluated by relative unlevelness index (RUI) value calculated using the equation proposed by Senthilkumar and Muthukumar [2]. Color fastness to soaping and rubbing were examined in accordance with Textiles Test Specification for Color Fastness (GB3921.3-1997 and GB3920-1997) based on ISO international standards, which are included in the national standards of China.


## 2.1. Materials and Reagents

Commercially scoured, bleached, and mercerized cotton woven fabric was used in this study. This fabric was further treated with a solution containing 2.0 gL−1 Na2CO3 and 2.0 gL−1 soap at the boil for 30 minutes, then thoroughly washed with cold water and dried at ambient temperature. The commercial PTFE fibers were purchased from Fuxin Sengfuli Polymer Materials Co., China. Acrylic acid, FeCl3·6H2O, CuSO4·5H2O, H2O2 (30%, w/w), Na2SO4, and Na2CO3 were of analytical grade and all purchased from the Tianjin Nankai Chemicals Co., China. Three commercial grade reactive dyes including Reactive Red 195 (RR 195), Reactive Yellow 145 (RY 145), and Reactive Blue 222 (RB 222) were supplied by Tianjin Sanhuan Chemical Co., China. These dyes were not purified prior to use. Their molecular structures are presented in Scheme 1.Scheme 1
Chemical structures of the three dyes.


## 2.2. Reactive Dyeing Procedure

A laboratory dyeing machine with 12 stainless steel dyeing tubes of 500 mL capacity was used for dyeing. Known weight of pretreated cotton fabric was dyed at 3.0% shade on weight of fabric (owf) with the dyes selected using a fabric/liquor ratio of 1 : 50 at 60°C for 40 min. Dye bath consisted of necessary quantity of reactive dye, 40.0 gL−1 Na2SO4, and tap fresh water. After dyeing, the fixation of the adsorbed dye on cotton fabric was conducted at 60°C for 30 min by adding Na2CO3 into the dyeing bath. The dyed fabric was then removed from the dye bath and squeezed to fall back in the bath itself. Afterwards, the dyed fabrics were rinsed thoroughly using water at the boil for 15 min and air dried. Finally, the rinsing effluent was collected and mixed with the exhausted dyebath water to form the dyeing wastewater.


## 2.3. Preparation of Metal Modified PTFE Fibrous Catalysts

### 2.3.1. Graft Polymerization of PTFE Fibers

According to the literatures [18], 5.0 g of the dried PTFE fibers was immersed into the monomer solution containing 50 mL acrylic acid and 100 mL deionized water in a 250 mL flask. Ammonium ferrous sulphate (3.0 wt%) was also used in the monomer solution to minimize the homopolymerization of acrylic acid during the reaction. The flask containing the monomer solution and fibers was bubbled with nitrogen to remove oxygen and was sealed. The mixture in the flask was directly subjected to gamma rays of irradiation from a 60Co source at a dose rate of 0.5 kGyh−1 for the given time. After irradiation, the grafted PTFE fibers (denoted as PAA-g-PTFE) were taken out, washed with hot water and acetone repeatedly and dried in a vacuum oven at 50°C for 24 h, and weighed. The grafting degree of PTFE fibers was determined by the percentage increase in weight to be 36.48%.


### 2.3.2. Metal PAA-g-PTFE Complexes

Five grams of PAA-g-PTFE was placed into 150 mL of mixed metal salt aqueous solutions of FeCl3 and CuSO4. In all cases, the concentrations of the total metal ions were kept constant at 0.10 molL−1. The mixture was then treated at 50°C and pH 2-3 for the given time under continuous agitation. The resulting fibrous metal complexes were filtered, washed with deionized water, and dried under vacuum at 60°C for 4.0 h to obtain Fe grafted PTFE fiber complex (denoted as Fe-PAA-g-PTFE), Cu grafted PTFE fiber complex (denoted as Cu-PAA-g-PTFE), and Cu-Fe bimetal grafted PTFE fiber complex (Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE). The residual concentrations of Fe (III) and Cu (II) ions in the solutions after coordination were determined using a WXF120 atomic absorption spectrometry (Beijing Rayleigh Analytical Instrument Corp., China) for calculating the Fe content (QFe) and Cu content (QCu) of the complexes, respectively.


## 2.3.1. Graft Polymerization of PTFE Fibers

According to the literatures [18], 5.0 g of the dried PTFE fibers was immersed into the monomer solution containing 50 mL acrylic acid and 100 mL deionized water in a 250 mL flask. Ammonium ferrous sulphate (3.0 wt%) was also used in the monomer solution to minimize the homopolymerization of acrylic acid during the reaction. The flask containing the monomer solution and fibers was bubbled with nitrogen to remove oxygen and was sealed. The mixture in the flask was directly subjected to gamma rays of irradiation from a 60Co source at a dose rate of 0.5 kGyh−1 for the given time. After irradiation, the grafted PTFE fibers (denoted as PAA-g-PTFE) were taken out, washed with hot water and acetone repeatedly and dried in a vacuum oven at 50°C for 24 h, and weighed. The grafting degree of PTFE fibers was determined by the percentage increase in weight to be 36.48%.


## 2.3.2. Metal PAA-g-PTFE Complexes

Five grams of PAA-g-PTFE was placed into 150 mL of mixed metal salt aqueous solutions of FeCl3 and CuSO4. In all cases, the concentrations of the total metal ions were kept constant at 0.10 molL−1. The mixture was then treated at 50°C and pH 2-3 for the given time under continuous agitation. The resulting fibrous metal complexes were filtered, washed with deionized water, and dried under vacuum at 60°C for 4.0 h to obtain Fe grafted PTFE fiber complex (denoted as Fe-PAA-g-PTFE), Cu grafted PTFE fiber complex (denoted as Cu-PAA-g-PTFE), and Cu-Fe bimetal grafted PTFE fiber complex (Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE). The residual concentrations of Fe (III) and Cu (II) ions in the solutions after coordination were determined using a WXF120 atomic absorption spectrometry (Beijing Rayleigh Analytical Instrument Corp., China) for calculating the Fe content (QFe) and Cu content (QCu) of the complexes, respectively.


## 2.4. Treatment and Recycle of Dyeing Effluent

The treating system of dyeing effluent included filtration, degradation, and active carbon fiber adsorption units. The dyeing effluent was firstly filtrated to remove the fiber tows for obtaining a better degradation. The dyeing effluent was degraded at room temperature for the given time using a photoreaction system consist mainly of chamber, UV lamp (400 W, 365 nm), electromagnetic valve, relay, water bath, and reaction vessels. The schematic diagram of the photoreaction system was presented in our previous works [14, 16]. PAA-g-PTFE complex was firstly fixed on small glass rack and then placed into the mixing solution of dyeing effluent and H2O2 in reaction vessels. The pH of the solution was adjusted with 0.10 mmolL−1 HNO3 and/or NaOH aqueous solution and measured using DHS-25C digital pH meter (Shanghai Jingmi Instrumental Co., China). Afterwards, the treated dyeing effluent was further purified by the active carbon fibers (BET specific surface area: 800–2000 m2g−1) and then characterized for pH value, electric conductivity, color, and total organic carbon (TOC) value according to standard methods. Color of the dyeing effluent was determined by the absorbance measurements using UV-2401 Shimadzu spectrophotometer at the λmax of each dye or 500 nm for the real dyeing effluent. The decoloration percentage of the dye was expressed using
(1)D%=C0-CC0×100%,
where C0 and C are the initial and residual concentrations of the dye (mgL−1), respectively. Meanwhile, TOC value was measured in the process using a Phoenix 8000 TOC analyzer (Tekmar-Dehrmann Inc., USA), and the TOC removal percentage of the dye was calculated by
(2)TOCremoval(%)=TOC0-TOCtTOC0×100%,
where TOC0 and TOCt are the TOC values (mgL−1) at reaction times 0 and t, respectively. When the treated effluents were reused, the same dyeing procedure given above was employed through adjusting the concentration of sodium sulfate to 40.0 gL−1 in the dyeing bath, and the dyed samples were assessed for their quality. A schematic of the methodology for degradation and reuse of reactive dyeing effluent is depicted in Figure 1.Figure 1
Schematic of degradation and reuse processes of reactive dyeing effluent.


## 2.5. Evaluation of Dyed Cotton Fabrics

Color strength (K/S) of the dyed fabric was established with the aid of Kubelka-Munk equation:
(3)KS=(1-R)22R,
where R = fraction of light reflected, K = absorption coefficient, and S = scattering coefficient.A Datacolor International SF-600 spectrophotometer interfaced to a personal computer under D65 illuminant, using a 10° standard observer, was used to measureK/S values. The wavelength measured ranged from 400 to 700 nm with an interval of 10 nm. The greater the K/S value, the greater the coloration of the fabric sample. Then a K/S change percentage (K/Smax%) was calculated through
(4)K/Smax%=K/Smax-2-K/Smax-1K/Smax-1×100%,
where K/Smax-1 and K/Smax-2 are K/S values at the λmax of the dyed fabric using tap fresh water and the treated dyeing effluent, respectively. Moreover, the effect of recycling of treated dyeing water on color reproduction and lightness on cotton fabric was also analyzed using DE* and DL* values, respectively, calculated with the help of CIE L*, a*, and b* (CIELAB) equations. Level dyeing property of the dyed cotton fabric was evaluated by relative unlevelness index (RUI) value calculated using the equation proposed by Senthilkumar and Muthukumar [2]. Color fastness to soaping and rubbing were examined in accordance with Textiles Test Specification for Color Fastness (GB3921.3-1997 and GB3920-1997) based on ISO international standards, which are included in the national standards of China.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Optimization of Metal Modified PTFE Fibrous Catalyst

Our previous work [19] revealed that Fe modified PTFE fiber complexes acted as an effective heterogeneous Fenton catalyst for the dye degradation under UV or visible irradiation. Moreover, the Cu-Fe bimetallic modified PTFE fiber complexes exhibited the excellent catalytic activity because of the existence of synergetic effect between Fe (III) and Cu (II) ions. In order to meet the demands for rapid and stable dye degradation in future commercial application, a series of Cu-Fe bimetal PAA-g-PTFE complexes with different Cu/Fe molar ratios were prepared and used in the degradation of the three simulated dyeing effluents containing 0.05 mmol/L reactive dye studied, respectively. The influence of Cu/Fe molar ratio on decoloration percentage of each dye within 180 min (D180%) was presented in Table 1.Table 1
Effect of Cu/Fe ratio on decoloration of three reactive dyes.
Samples
Metal content (mmol L−1)
Cu/Fe
D
180%
Q
Fe
Q
Cu
Total
RR195
RY145
RB222
Fe-PAA-g-PTFE
1.89
0.00
1.89
0
47.31
45.67
43.75
Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (i)
1.13
0.75
1.88
0.66
61.22
58.80
57.93
Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii)
0.54
1.55
2.09
2.87
84.65
79.18
78.55
Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (iii)
0.31
1.75
2.06
5.65
78.47
73.67
72.85
Cu-PAA-g-PTFE
0.00
1.98
1.98
/
51.90
45.79
44.86
[dye] = 0.05 mmol L−1, [H2O2] = 6.0 mmol L−1, catalyst = 5.0 g L−1, pH = 6.The data in Table1 indicate that D180% value of each dyeing effluent in the presence of the bimetal PAA-g-PTFE complexes is much higher than those in the presence of the monometal PAA-g-PTE complexes, and the maximum D180% value is achieved for Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii). This confirms that catalytic activity of metal PAA-g-PTFE complexes depends highly upon their Cu/Fe molar ratio, and Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) with a Cu/Fe molar ratio of 2.87 shows the best catalytic activity at alkaline pH medium.


### 3.2. H2O2 Initial Concentration

The degradation of each reactive dye (0.05 mmolL−1) was performed at pH 6 for 180 min in the presence of 5.0 gL−1 Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) and varied H2O2 initial concentration from 0 to 10.0 mmolL−1. The D180% values of three dyes were shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Degradation of three dyes with varied initial concentration of H2O2.Figure2 shows that the D180% values of three dyes gradually increase with increasing H2O2 initial concentration, and the increasing tendency levels at the concentration of 6.0 mmolL−1. Moreover, their D180% values are higher than 95% when H2O2 initial concentration reached 6.0 mmolL−1. These results indicate that almost all dye molecules have been degraded under this condition. Accordingly, 6.0 mmolL−1 was considered to be the optimum H2O2 initial concentration for the degradation of 0.05 mmolL−1 dye in solution.


### 3.3. The Solution pH

Some works [20–22] revealed that the heterogeneous Fenton catalysts exhibited the high catalytic function for dye degradation over a wide pH range. In order to determine the dependence of photocatalytic performance of Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) on the solution pH, Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) and H2O2 concentration were set at 5.0 gL−1 and 6.0 mmolL−1; respectively, the degradation of each dye (0.05 mmolL−1) was then conducted for 180 min at different pH levels, and the relationship between pH and D180% value were given in Figure 3.Figure 3
Relationship between pH andD180% value.Figure3 shows that D180% values at pH 3 and 6 are much higher than those at pH 9 for all the dyes. These results demonstrated that Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) showed excellent catalytic performance at acid medium. It should be noticed that the decreased D200% values were observed for all the dyes; however, their D180% values were still over 75% at pH 9. This proved that Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) could significantly accelerate the dye degradation in a broad pH range, which is similar to the photocatalytic activity of the heterogeneous photocatalysts such as Fe alginate gel bead [20] and bimetallic Cu/Fe clay [22].


### 3.4. Influence of Sodium Sulfate on Dye Degradation

In order to accelerate absorption of reactive dyes onto cotton fibers in water, Na2SO4 are often used as the promoters in the dyeing of cotton fabrics with reactive dyes [1]. However, the addition of Na2SO4 in the dyebath may have an effect on dyeing effluent treatment processes. Hence, the degradation of the three simulated dyeing effluents containing 0.05 mmolL−1 reactive dye studied using Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii)/H2O2 system was carried out in the presence or absence of Na2SO4, and the results were shown in Figure 4.Effect of Na2SO4 on degradation of three reactive dyes ([dye] = 0.05 mmolL−1, [H2O2] = 6.0 mmolL−1, catalyst = 5.0 gL−1, [Na2SO4] = 10.05 gL−1, pH = 6).
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure4 shows that D% and TOC removal (%) values of each dye increase with the prolonging of reaction time. It should be noticed that the addition of Na2SO4 leads to little reduction in D% and TOC removal (%) for all the dyes, suggesting that the degradation of the reactive dyes is almost not affected by Na2SO4 in aqueous solution. This may be due to the two competing factors. On one hand, it is obvious that the presence of salt can increase the aggregation degree of ionic dyes in water, inhabiting the dye degradation [23].On the other hand, the reaction between sulfate ions and hydroxyl radical produced by photo-Fenton reaction can generate the higher oxidative sulphate radicals, which increase the dye degradation efficiency [24].


### 3.5. Treatment of Real Reactive Dyeing Effluents

The raw reactive dyeing effluents from coloration processes mentioned above were characterized with respect to pH, electric conductivity, color, andTOC values prior to any treatment and then treated using successive filtration, degradation, and active carbon adsorption units presented in Figure 1. The degradation process was conducted using a heterogeneous Fenton system consisting of Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) and H2O2. The optimal conditions were determined as follows: Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii), 5.0 gL−1; H2O2 concentration, 6.0 mmolL−1; degradation duration, 4.0 h, based on the results of optimization experiments. More importantly, our previous work [25] reported that the used Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) could be reused five times by thorough wash with mixed solution of 50/50 (v/v)% water and ethanol under ultrasonication. The reason is that this photocatalyst was developed with the intention of (a) withstanding the corrosion due to the oxidative radicals produced in solution and (b) fixing the metal ions on a support in a stable way so as not to allow them to leach out during the reaction. The treated effluent was reused for the dyeing of cotton fabric after the characterization. The quality of the raw and treated effluents after different recycling processes was summarized in Table 2.Table 2
Characteristics of raw and decolorized dyeing wastewater.
Numbers ofrecycling processes
Parameters
Raw wastewater
Treated wastewater
Removal %
First
pH
8.48
6.22
/
Color (Abs)
0.502
0.008
98.41
Conductivity (mscm−1)
21.91
22.87
−4.38
TOC (mg L−1)
92.97
22.88
75.38
Second
pH
8.61
6.09
/
Color (Abs)
0.522
0.009
98.27
Conductivity (mscm−1)
23.55
25.19
−6.96
TOC (mg L−1)
104.2
38.02
63.51
Third
pH
8.78
7.02
/
Color (Abs)
0.533
0.010
98.12
Conductivity (mscm−1)
25.18
27.09
−7.60
TOC (mg L−1)
112.1
47.74
57.41
Fourth
pH
8.52
7.34
/
Color (Abs)
0.538
0.011
97.95
Conductivity (mscm−1)
29.35
32.38
−10.32
TOC (mg L−1)
126.1
69.09
45.22
The absorbance (Abs) at 500 nm is used to evaluate the color of real dyeing effluent. Color removal % equalsD% value for real dyeing effluent.It is evident from the data in Table2 that the color removals of more than 97% for the dyeing effluents from different recycling processes can be obtained after the treatment. However, the TOC removals of the treated dyeing effluents gradually decrease as the number of recycling processes increases. This suggests that although the dyeing effluents can be almost completely decolorized using Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii)/H2O2 system, the mineralization of the dye molecules in the effluents is limited possibly due to the partial oxidation of organic substrates. Similar results have been reported in the ozonation treatment of reactive and acid dyeing wastewaters [2, 4]. It is observed from Table 2 that their pH value and electric conductivity increase with the increasing number of recycling processes. This is attributed mainly to fact that addition of Na2SO4 and Na2CO3 during the recycling. It should be noted that pH values decline after the treatment for all the wastewaters from the recycling processes. This may be owing to the generation of acidic by-products during the oxidation makes the effluent acidic in nature [26]. Additionally, the treatment leads to higher conductivity, indicating that inorganic salt concentration increases in the treated effluent because of the partial mineralization of the dyes in water.


### 3.6. Evaluation of Dyeing Quality

The quality of the cotton fabrics dyed with three reactive dyes using the treated dyeing effluent was evaluated with respect to their color strength, color difference, fastness, and leveling properties, respectively. The effect of recycling process on the dyeing quality was then examined in order to assess the color reproduction in the treated dyeing effluent. Consequently, the dyeing of cotton fabrics using tap fresh water was regarded as the control experiment, and the resulting dyed cotton fabric in the control experiment was used as the control sample, by which dyeing reproducibility was judged.


#### 3.6.1. Color Strength

K
/
S curves and K/Smax% values of the dyed cotton fabrics obtained from various recycling processes and the control experiments were measured and calculated; the experimental results were presented in Figure 5.K
/
S curves and K/Smax% values of three dyed cotton fabrics compared to control samples.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)It is found, from Figure5, that K/S curves of the dyed cotton fabrics in the recycling processes, especially the first and second recycling processes are similar to those of the control samples. The K/Smax% values of the samples dyed with three reactive dyes, particularly RY 145 and RB 222, significantly increase with the increasing number of recycling processes. In the case of RY 145, the K/Smax% value of the dyed sample is slightly more than 5.0% in the fourth recycling, implying that dyeing with RY 145 using the treated effluent is limited in fourth recycling.


#### 3.6.2. Color Differences

The DE*, DL*, Da*, Db*, DC*, and DH* values of three dyed cotton fabrics produced from different recycling processes are given in Table3.Table 3
Color differences of three dyed fabrics with respect to control samples.
Dyes
Numbers ofrecycling processes
DE*
DL*
Da*
Db*
DC*
DH*
RR 195
First
0.475
0.343
0.121
−0.306
0.078
−0.320
Second
0.525
−0.182
−0.263
0.417
−0.205
0.448
Third
0.863
−0.584
−0.012
0.635
0.074
0.631
Fourth
1.301
−0.551
−0.265
1.148
−0.102
1.174
RY 145
First
0.112
−0.039
0.103
0.018
0.062
−0.084
Second
0.213
−0.034
−0.007
0.210
0.188
0.094
Third
0.681
−0.046
−0.101
−0.672
−0.653
−0.188
Fourth
0.680
−0.265
0.608
0.151
0.411
−0.473
RB 222
First
0.241
−0.216
−0.108
−0.007
0.028
−0.105
Second
0.583
−0.497
0.04
0.303
−0.305
−0.022
Third
0.963
−0.879
0.106
0.379
−0.393
0.033
Fourth
0.995
−0.954
0.002
0.285
−0.280
−0.053
The control samples were regarded as the references.It is clear, from Table3, that, for three reactive dyes, the DE* values of the dyed fabrics became higher with the increasing number of recycling processes, while their DL* values exhibit a reverse trend. This proposes that the dyed fabrics produced by recycling processes become gradually darker in shade compared with the control samples because of their negative DL* values. This may be mainly attributed to the insignificant variation in inorganic salt concentration and pH level of the treated dyeing effluents. The dyed fabrics are generally acceptable when the DE* values are between 0 and 1.5 and the DL* values are between −0.7 and 0.4. If the DL* values are less than −0.7, the samples are darker in shade, and if they are greater than 0.4 the samples are lighter in shade compared to that of control sample [2]. Therefore, as seen from Table 3, in the case of RR 195 and RY 145, the DE* and DL* values fall in acceptable limits for all the recycling process, suggesting that recycled effluents can be used four times; whereas, for RB 222, the DE* values are accepted in all the recycles; however, the DL* values are lower than −0.7 in the last two recycling processes. This reveals that the recycled effluents can be used only two times for RB 222, which may be attributed to increasing amount of the intermediates formed during Fenton-treatment in third and fourth recycling processes. Also this mainly stems from the difference in the dyeing characteristics and molecular structure between these reactive dyes.


#### 3.6.3. Level Dyeing Character

In order to accurately examine the levelness of the dyed cotton fabrics obtained from various recycling processes and control experiments, their RUI index were calculated and provided in Table4.Table 4
Relative unlevelness index (RUI) values of dyed samples.
Dyed samples
Reactive red 195
Reactive yellow 145
Reactive blue 222
Control
0.022
0.030
0.033
First recycle
0.046
0.055
0.052
Second recycle
0.067
0.081
0.070
Third recycle
0.091
0.099
0.102
Fourth recycle
0.137
0.158
0.149
RUI values: <0.2 (excellent levelness), 0.2–0.49 (good levelness), 0.5–1.0 (poor levelness ), and >1.0 (bad levelness) [2].It is seen from Table4 that the RUI indexes of the dyed cotton fabrics using the treated effluents are higher than those of control samples, and it shows a gradual increasing trend as the number of recycling processes increases. But these RUI indexes are still accepted according to the relationship between RUI and visual appearance of levelness suggested by Senthilkumar and Muthukumar [2].


#### 3.6.4. Fastness Properties

The soaping fastness and rubbing fastness of the dyed cotton fabrics obtained from various recycling processes and the control experiments were tested and summarized in Table5.Table 5
Soaping and rubbing fastness of dyed cotton fabrics in recycling processes.
Dyes
Numbers ofrecycling processes
Soaping fastness
Rubbing fastness
Staining
Fading
Dry
Wet
Reactive red 195
Control
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
First
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
Second
4-5
4
4-5
4
Third
4-5
4
4
4
Fourth
4
4
4
4
Reactive yellow 145
Control
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
First
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
Second
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Third
4-5
4
4-5
4
Fourth
4
4
4
4
Reactiveblue 222
Control
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
First
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Second
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Third
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Fourth
4
4
4
4The data in Table5 indicate that the increase in number of recycling processes is accompanied by an insignificant reduction in the soaping fastness and rubbing fastness of the dyed cotton fabrics. This demonstrates that the formation of by-products during Fenton reaction may interfere with the fixation of the reactive dye on cellulose fiber during the dyeing procedure, thus, causing the insignificant reduction in color fastness. However, it is believed that the soaping fastness and rubbing fastness of the dyed cotton fabrics using the treated dyeing effluent as the aqueous medium are still of practical value in the future commercial application.


## 3.1. Optimization of Metal Modified PTFE Fibrous Catalyst

Our previous work [19] revealed that Fe modified PTFE fiber complexes acted as an effective heterogeneous Fenton catalyst for the dye degradation under UV or visible irradiation. Moreover, the Cu-Fe bimetallic modified PTFE fiber complexes exhibited the excellent catalytic activity because of the existence of synergetic effect between Fe (III) and Cu (II) ions. In order to meet the demands for rapid and stable dye degradation in future commercial application, a series of Cu-Fe bimetal PAA-g-PTFE complexes with different Cu/Fe molar ratios were prepared and used in the degradation of the three simulated dyeing effluents containing 0.05 mmol/L reactive dye studied, respectively. The influence of Cu/Fe molar ratio on decoloration percentage of each dye within 180 min (D180%) was presented in Table 1.Table 1
Effect of Cu/Fe ratio on decoloration of three reactive dyes.
Samples
Metal content (mmol L−1)
Cu/Fe
D
180%
Q
Fe
Q
Cu
Total
RR195
RY145
RB222
Fe-PAA-g-PTFE
1.89
0.00
1.89
0
47.31
45.67
43.75
Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (i)
1.13
0.75
1.88
0.66
61.22
58.80
57.93
Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii)
0.54
1.55
2.09
2.87
84.65
79.18
78.55
Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (iii)
0.31
1.75
2.06
5.65
78.47
73.67
72.85
Cu-PAA-g-PTFE
0.00
1.98
1.98
/
51.90
45.79
44.86
[dye] = 0.05 mmol L−1, [H2O2] = 6.0 mmol L−1, catalyst = 5.0 g L−1, pH = 6.The data in Table1 indicate that D180% value of each dyeing effluent in the presence of the bimetal PAA-g-PTFE complexes is much higher than those in the presence of the monometal PAA-g-PTE complexes, and the maximum D180% value is achieved for Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii). This confirms that catalytic activity of metal PAA-g-PTFE complexes depends highly upon their Cu/Fe molar ratio, and Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) with a Cu/Fe molar ratio of 2.87 shows the best catalytic activity at alkaline pH medium.


## 3.2. H2O2 Initial Concentration

The degradation of each reactive dye (0.05 mmolL−1) was performed at pH 6 for 180 min in the presence of 5.0 gL−1 Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) and varied H2O2 initial concentration from 0 to 10.0 mmolL−1. The D180% values of three dyes were shown in Figure 2.Figure 2
Degradation of three dyes with varied initial concentration of H2O2.Figure2 shows that the D180% values of three dyes gradually increase with increasing H2O2 initial concentration, and the increasing tendency levels at the concentration of 6.0 mmolL−1. Moreover, their D180% values are higher than 95% when H2O2 initial concentration reached 6.0 mmolL−1. These results indicate that almost all dye molecules have been degraded under this condition. Accordingly, 6.0 mmolL−1 was considered to be the optimum H2O2 initial concentration for the degradation of 0.05 mmolL−1 dye in solution.


## 3.3. The Solution pH

Some works [20–22] revealed that the heterogeneous Fenton catalysts exhibited the high catalytic function for dye degradation over a wide pH range. In order to determine the dependence of photocatalytic performance of Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) on the solution pH, Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) and H2O2 concentration were set at 5.0 gL−1 and 6.0 mmolL−1; respectively, the degradation of each dye (0.05 mmolL−1) was then conducted for 180 min at different pH levels, and the relationship between pH and D180% value were given in Figure 3.Figure 3
Relationship between pH andD180% value.Figure3 shows that D180% values at pH 3 and 6 are much higher than those at pH 9 for all the dyes. These results demonstrated that Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) showed excellent catalytic performance at acid medium. It should be noticed that the decreased D200% values were observed for all the dyes; however, their D180% values were still over 75% at pH 9. This proved that Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) could significantly accelerate the dye degradation in a broad pH range, which is similar to the photocatalytic activity of the heterogeneous photocatalysts such as Fe alginate gel bead [20] and bimetallic Cu/Fe clay [22].


## 3.4. Influence of Sodium Sulfate on Dye Degradation

In order to accelerate absorption of reactive dyes onto cotton fibers in water, Na2SO4 are often used as the promoters in the dyeing of cotton fabrics with reactive dyes [1]. However, the addition of Na2SO4 in the dyebath may have an effect on dyeing effluent treatment processes. Hence, the degradation of the three simulated dyeing effluents containing 0.05 mmolL−1 reactive dye studied using Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii)/H2O2 system was carried out in the presence or absence of Na2SO4, and the results were shown in Figure 4.Effect of Na2SO4 on degradation of three reactive dyes ([dye] = 0.05 mmolL−1, [H2O2] = 6.0 mmolL−1, catalyst = 5.0 gL−1, [Na2SO4] = 10.05 gL−1, pH = 6).
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure4 shows that D% and TOC removal (%) values of each dye increase with the prolonging of reaction time. It should be noticed that the addition of Na2SO4 leads to little reduction in D% and TOC removal (%) for all the dyes, suggesting that the degradation of the reactive dyes is almost not affected by Na2SO4 in aqueous solution. This may be due to the two competing factors. On one hand, it is obvious that the presence of salt can increase the aggregation degree of ionic dyes in water, inhabiting the dye degradation [23].On the other hand, the reaction between sulfate ions and hydroxyl radical produced by photo-Fenton reaction can generate the higher oxidative sulphate radicals, which increase the dye degradation efficiency [24].


## 3.5. Treatment of Real Reactive Dyeing Effluents

The raw reactive dyeing effluents from coloration processes mentioned above were characterized with respect to pH, electric conductivity, color, andTOC values prior to any treatment and then treated using successive filtration, degradation, and active carbon adsorption units presented in Figure 1. The degradation process was conducted using a heterogeneous Fenton system consisting of Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) and H2O2. The optimal conditions were determined as follows: Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii), 5.0 gL−1; H2O2 concentration, 6.0 mmolL−1; degradation duration, 4.0 h, based on the results of optimization experiments. More importantly, our previous work [25] reported that the used Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii) could be reused five times by thorough wash with mixed solution of 50/50 (v/v)% water and ethanol under ultrasonication. The reason is that this photocatalyst was developed with the intention of (a) withstanding the corrosion due to the oxidative radicals produced in solution and (b) fixing the metal ions on a support in a stable way so as not to allow them to leach out during the reaction. The treated effluent was reused for the dyeing of cotton fabric after the characterization. The quality of the raw and treated effluents after different recycling processes was summarized in Table 2.Table 2
Characteristics of raw and decolorized dyeing wastewater.
Numbers ofrecycling processes
Parameters
Raw wastewater
Treated wastewater
Removal %
First
pH
8.48
6.22
/
Color (Abs)
0.502
0.008
98.41
Conductivity (mscm−1)
21.91
22.87
−4.38
TOC (mg L−1)
92.97
22.88
75.38
Second
pH
8.61
6.09
/
Color (Abs)
0.522
0.009
98.27
Conductivity (mscm−1)
23.55
25.19
−6.96
TOC (mg L−1)
104.2
38.02
63.51
Third
pH
8.78
7.02
/
Color (Abs)
0.533
0.010
98.12
Conductivity (mscm−1)
25.18
27.09
−7.60
TOC (mg L−1)
112.1
47.74
57.41
Fourth
pH
8.52
7.34
/
Color (Abs)
0.538
0.011
97.95
Conductivity (mscm−1)
29.35
32.38
−10.32
TOC (mg L−1)
126.1
69.09
45.22
The absorbance (Abs) at 500 nm is used to evaluate the color of real dyeing effluent. Color removal % equalsD% value for real dyeing effluent.It is evident from the data in Table2 that the color removals of more than 97% for the dyeing effluents from different recycling processes can be obtained after the treatment. However, the TOC removals of the treated dyeing effluents gradually decrease as the number of recycling processes increases. This suggests that although the dyeing effluents can be almost completely decolorized using Cu-Fe-PAA-g-PTFE (ii)/H2O2 system, the mineralization of the dye molecules in the effluents is limited possibly due to the partial oxidation of organic substrates. Similar results have been reported in the ozonation treatment of reactive and acid dyeing wastewaters [2, 4]. It is observed from Table 2 that their pH value and electric conductivity increase with the increasing number of recycling processes. This is attributed mainly to fact that addition of Na2SO4 and Na2CO3 during the recycling. It should be noted that pH values decline after the treatment for all the wastewaters from the recycling processes. This may be owing to the generation of acidic by-products during the oxidation makes the effluent acidic in nature [26]. Additionally, the treatment leads to higher conductivity, indicating that inorganic salt concentration increases in the treated effluent because of the partial mineralization of the dyes in water.


## 3.6. Evaluation of Dyeing Quality

The quality of the cotton fabrics dyed with three reactive dyes using the treated dyeing effluent was evaluated with respect to their color strength, color difference, fastness, and leveling properties, respectively. The effect of recycling process on the dyeing quality was then examined in order to assess the color reproduction in the treated dyeing effluent. Consequently, the dyeing of cotton fabrics using tap fresh water was regarded as the control experiment, and the resulting dyed cotton fabric in the control experiment was used as the control sample, by which dyeing reproducibility was judged.


### 3.6.1. Color Strength

K
/
S curves and K/Smax% values of the dyed cotton fabrics obtained from various recycling processes and the control experiments were measured and calculated; the experimental results were presented in Figure 5.K
/
S curves and K/Smax% values of three dyed cotton fabrics compared to control samples.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)It is found, from Figure5, that K/S curves of the dyed cotton fabrics in the recycling processes, especially the first and second recycling processes are similar to those of the control samples. The K/Smax% values of the samples dyed with three reactive dyes, particularly RY 145 and RB 222, significantly increase with the increasing number of recycling processes. In the case of RY 145, the K/Smax% value of the dyed sample is slightly more than 5.0% in the fourth recycling, implying that dyeing with RY 145 using the treated effluent is limited in fourth recycling.


### 3.6.2. Color Differences

The DE*, DL*, Da*, Db*, DC*, and DH* values of three dyed cotton fabrics produced from different recycling processes are given in Table3.Table 3
Color differences of three dyed fabrics with respect to control samples.
Dyes
Numbers ofrecycling processes
DE*
DL*
Da*
Db*
DC*
DH*
RR 195
First
0.475
0.343
0.121
−0.306
0.078
−0.320
Second
0.525
−0.182
−0.263
0.417
−0.205
0.448
Third
0.863
−0.584
−0.012
0.635
0.074
0.631
Fourth
1.301
−0.551
−0.265
1.148
−0.102
1.174
RY 145
First
0.112
−0.039
0.103
0.018
0.062
−0.084
Second
0.213
−0.034
−0.007
0.210
0.188
0.094
Third
0.681
−0.046
−0.101
−0.672
−0.653
−0.188
Fourth
0.680
−0.265
0.608
0.151
0.411
−0.473
RB 222
First
0.241
−0.216
−0.108
−0.007
0.028
−0.105
Second
0.583
−0.497
0.04
0.303
−0.305
−0.022
Third
0.963
−0.879
0.106
0.379
−0.393
0.033
Fourth
0.995
−0.954
0.002
0.285
−0.280
−0.053
The control samples were regarded as the references.It is clear, from Table3, that, for three reactive dyes, the DE* values of the dyed fabrics became higher with the increasing number of recycling processes, while their DL* values exhibit a reverse trend. This proposes that the dyed fabrics produced by recycling processes become gradually darker in shade compared with the control samples because of their negative DL* values. This may be mainly attributed to the insignificant variation in inorganic salt concentration and pH level of the treated dyeing effluents. The dyed fabrics are generally acceptable when the DE* values are between 0 and 1.5 and the DL* values are between −0.7 and 0.4. If the DL* values are less than −0.7, the samples are darker in shade, and if they are greater than 0.4 the samples are lighter in shade compared to that of control sample [2]. Therefore, as seen from Table 3, in the case of RR 195 and RY 145, the DE* and DL* values fall in acceptable limits for all the recycling process, suggesting that recycled effluents can be used four times; whereas, for RB 222, the DE* values are accepted in all the recycles; however, the DL* values are lower than −0.7 in the last two recycling processes. This reveals that the recycled effluents can be used only two times for RB 222, which may be attributed to increasing amount of the intermediates formed during Fenton-treatment in third and fourth recycling processes. Also this mainly stems from the difference in the dyeing characteristics and molecular structure between these reactive dyes.


### 3.6.3. Level Dyeing Character

In order to accurately examine the levelness of the dyed cotton fabrics obtained from various recycling processes and control experiments, their RUI index were calculated and provided in Table4.Table 4
Relative unlevelness index (RUI) values of dyed samples.
Dyed samples
Reactive red 195
Reactive yellow 145
Reactive blue 222
Control
0.022
0.030
0.033
First recycle
0.046
0.055
0.052
Second recycle
0.067
0.081
0.070
Third recycle
0.091
0.099
0.102
Fourth recycle
0.137
0.158
0.149
RUI values: <0.2 (excellent levelness), 0.2–0.49 (good levelness), 0.5–1.0 (poor levelness ), and >1.0 (bad levelness) [2].It is seen from Table4 that the RUI indexes of the dyed cotton fabrics using the treated effluents are higher than those of control samples, and it shows a gradual increasing trend as the number of recycling processes increases. But these RUI indexes are still accepted according to the relationship between RUI and visual appearance of levelness suggested by Senthilkumar and Muthukumar [2].


### 3.6.4. Fastness Properties

The soaping fastness and rubbing fastness of the dyed cotton fabrics obtained from various recycling processes and the control experiments were tested and summarized in Table5.Table 5
Soaping and rubbing fastness of dyed cotton fabrics in recycling processes.
Dyes
Numbers ofrecycling processes
Soaping fastness
Rubbing fastness
Staining
Fading
Dry
Wet
Reactive red 195
Control
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
First
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
Second
4-5
4
4-5
4
Third
4-5
4
4
4
Fourth
4
4
4
4
Reactive yellow 145
Control
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
First
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
Second
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Third
4-5
4
4-5
4
Fourth
4
4
4
4
Reactiveblue 222
Control
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
First
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Second
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Third
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Fourth
4
4
4
4The data in Table5 indicate that the increase in number of recycling processes is accompanied by an insignificant reduction in the soaping fastness and rubbing fastness of the dyed cotton fabrics. This demonstrates that the formation of by-products during Fenton reaction may interfere with the fixation of the reactive dye on cellulose fiber during the dyeing procedure, thus, causing the insignificant reduction in color fastness. However, it is believed that the soaping fastness and rubbing fastness of the dyed cotton fabrics using the treated dyeing effluent as the aqueous medium are still of practical value in the future commercial application.


## 3.6.1. Color Strength

K
/
S curves and K/Smax% values of the dyed cotton fabrics obtained from various recycling processes and the control experiments were measured and calculated; the experimental results were presented in Figure 5.K
/
S curves and K/Smax% values of three dyed cotton fabrics compared to control samples.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)It is found, from Figure5, that K/S curves of the dyed cotton fabrics in the recycling processes, especially the first and second recycling processes are similar to those of the control samples. The K/Smax% values of the samples dyed with three reactive dyes, particularly RY 145 and RB 222, significantly increase with the increasing number of recycling processes. In the case of RY 145, the K/Smax% value of the dyed sample is slightly more than 5.0% in the fourth recycling, implying that dyeing with RY 145 using the treated effluent is limited in fourth recycling.


## 3.6.2. Color Differences

The DE*, DL*, Da*, Db*, DC*, and DH* values of three dyed cotton fabrics produced from different recycling processes are given in Table3.Table 3
Color differences of three dyed fabrics with respect to control samples.
Dyes
Numbers ofrecycling processes
DE*
DL*
Da*
Db*
DC*
DH*
RR 195
First
0.475
0.343
0.121
−0.306
0.078
−0.320
Second
0.525
−0.182
−0.263
0.417
−0.205
0.448
Third
0.863
−0.584
−0.012
0.635
0.074
0.631
Fourth
1.301
−0.551
−0.265
1.148
−0.102
1.174
RY 145
First
0.112
−0.039
0.103
0.018
0.062
−0.084
Second
0.213
−0.034
−0.007
0.210
0.188
0.094
Third
0.681
−0.046
−0.101
−0.672
−0.653
−0.188
Fourth
0.680
−0.265
0.608
0.151
0.411
−0.473
RB 222
First
0.241
−0.216
−0.108
−0.007
0.028
−0.105
Second
0.583
−0.497
0.04
0.303
−0.305
−0.022
Third
0.963
−0.879
0.106
0.379
−0.393
0.033
Fourth
0.995
−0.954
0.002
0.285
−0.280
−0.053
The control samples were regarded as the references.It is clear, from Table3, that, for three reactive dyes, the DE* values of the dyed fabrics became higher with the increasing number of recycling processes, while their DL* values exhibit a reverse trend. This proposes that the dyed fabrics produced by recycling processes become gradually darker in shade compared with the control samples because of their negative DL* values. This may be mainly attributed to the insignificant variation in inorganic salt concentration and pH level of the treated dyeing effluents. The dyed fabrics are generally acceptable when the DE* values are between 0 and 1.5 and the DL* values are between −0.7 and 0.4. If the DL* values are less than −0.7, the samples are darker in shade, and if they are greater than 0.4 the samples are lighter in shade compared to that of control sample [2]. Therefore, as seen from Table 3, in the case of RR 195 and RY 145, the DE* and DL* values fall in acceptable limits for all the recycling process, suggesting that recycled effluents can be used four times; whereas, for RB 222, the DE* values are accepted in all the recycles; however, the DL* values are lower than −0.7 in the last two recycling processes. This reveals that the recycled effluents can be used only two times for RB 222, which may be attributed to increasing amount of the intermediates formed during Fenton-treatment in third and fourth recycling processes. Also this mainly stems from the difference in the dyeing characteristics and molecular structure between these reactive dyes.


## 3.6.3. Level Dyeing Character

In order to accurately examine the levelness of the dyed cotton fabrics obtained from various recycling processes and control experiments, their RUI index were calculated and provided in Table4.Table 4
Relative unlevelness index (RUI) values of dyed samples.
Dyed samples
Reactive red 195
Reactive yellow 145
Reactive blue 222
Control
0.022
0.030
0.033
First recycle
0.046
0.055
0.052
Second recycle
0.067
0.081
0.070
Third recycle
0.091
0.099
0.102
Fourth recycle
0.137
0.158
0.149
RUI values: <0.2 (excellent levelness), 0.2–0.49 (good levelness), 0.5–1.0 (poor levelness ), and >1.0 (bad levelness) [2].It is seen from Table4 that the RUI indexes of the dyed cotton fabrics using the treated effluents are higher than those of control samples, and it shows a gradual increasing trend as the number of recycling processes increases. But these RUI indexes are still accepted according to the relationship between RUI and visual appearance of levelness suggested by Senthilkumar and Muthukumar [2].


## 3.6.4. Fastness Properties

The soaping fastness and rubbing fastness of the dyed cotton fabrics obtained from various recycling processes and the control experiments were tested and summarized in Table5.Table 5
Soaping and rubbing fastness of dyed cotton fabrics in recycling processes.
Dyes
Numbers ofrecycling processes
Soaping fastness
Rubbing fastness
Staining
Fading
Dry
Wet
Reactive red 195
Control
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
First
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
Second
4-5
4
4-5
4
Third
4-5
4
4
4
Fourth
4
4
4
4
Reactive yellow 145
Control
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
First
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
Second
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Third
4-5
4
4-5
4
Fourth
4
4
4
4
Reactiveblue 222
Control
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
First
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Second
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Third
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Fourth
4
4
4
4The data in Table5 indicate that the increase in number of recycling processes is accompanied by an insignificant reduction in the soaping fastness and rubbing fastness of the dyed cotton fabrics. This demonstrates that the formation of by-products during Fenton reaction may interfere with the fixation of the reactive dye on cellulose fiber during the dyeing procedure, thus, causing the insignificant reduction in color fastness. However, it is believed that the soaping fastness and rubbing fastness of the dyed cotton fabrics using the treated dyeing effluent as the aqueous medium are still of practical value in the future commercial application.


## 4. Conclusions

The Cu-Fe bimetallic modified PTFE fiber complex with a Cu/Fe molar ratio of 2.87 as a novel heterogeneous Fenton photocatalyst was successfully applied in the treatment and reuse of reactive dyeing effluents under UV irradiation. A complete decoloration and relatively highTOC removal can be achieved within 4 h, when this catalyst was used. TOC removal level is mainly dependent on the number of recycling processes. Increasing the number of recycling processes resulted in the dark shade, relatively big color differences, and insignificant deteriorated fastness of the dyed cotton fabrics using the treated dyeing effluence compared to those of control samples. Quality of the dyeing effluents treated by the resulting catalyst could comply with the criteria of water quality for reuse in the reactive dyeing processes. The number of recycled effluents is found to be highly determined by quality of the treated dyeing effluent and dyeing properties of the reactive dyes used. It should be pointed out that the TOC removal for treated dyeing effluents was below 60% except first two recycling processes. The impact of the significant increase in residual TOC value on fourth dyeing cycle suggests that this novel heterogeneous Fenton catalyst is feasible for decolorizing reactive dyebath waters for third cycle of reuse. Further TOC reduction of the treated dyeing effluent is needed for its repeated reuse in more than three dyeing cycles.



---

*Source: 169493-2013-11-27.xml*