# Rapid Green Synthetic Protocol for Novel Trimetallic Nanoparticles

Authors: B. Karthikeyan; B. Loganathan
Journal: Journal of Nanoparticles
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Metallic nanocomposites and nanotubes can be rapidly prepared under microwave irradiation (MW) from an aqueous solution of metallic precursors in the presence of trisodium citrate as a reductant. For the nanotubes nanoparticles are stabilized by poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) (PVP), a protecting agent. PVP is a typical capping and structure-directing agent used for the synthesis of various metallic nanostructures. In this work, we have demonstrated for the first time an MW irradiation approach for the synthesis of trimetallic nanocomposites and nanotubes. The resulting nanohybrids were characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopic analysis, high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopic analysis (EDX), and X-ray diffractometer (XRD) techniques.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Over the past decade there has been an increased emphasis on the topic of green chemistry and chemical processes [1]. Colloidal metallic nanoparticles are emerging as an important family of multifunctional nanoscale materials that assist diverse applications in various fields [2–7]. For these essential applications, a variety of preparation routes have been reported for the syntheses of metallic nanosized particles. In order to increase the efficiency of Pt-based bimetallic and trimetallic nanoparticles catalysts have been prepared [8, 9]. Because, in usual metal catalysts, addition of other element can often improve the catalytic activity and selectivity, from the same viewpoint bimetallic and trimetallic nanoparticles are also often investigated. Trimetallic nanoparticles retain an ever greater degree of catalytic activity than the bimetallic and monometallic ones. However, there have been only few reports of trimetallic nanoparticles in the literature. The reported trimetallic nanoparticles were synthesized by only thermal heating method [10–14].On the other hand, microwave (MW) dielectric heating is fast emerging as a widely accepted rapid processing technology for a variety of synthesis of nanoparticles. In the MW-assisted syntheses of nanoparticles, we found that MW heating is a rapid technology and it can control the size distribution of the nanoparticles than the conventional heating by thermal convection [15].In the present work on the preparation of nanosized trimetallic nanocomposites and trimetallic nanotubes from an aqueous solution of corresponding metallic precursors, we have employed trisodium citrate as a reducing agent for the preparation of different combinations of trimetallic nanoparticles and poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) (PVP) as a stabilizing agent. Using MW irradiation as a heating source, the rapid, homogeneous, and selective heating in the reaction system at the molecular level for rapid and size-controlled preparation of nanosized particles, which has never been achieved by other conventional methods is reported for the first time.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Hydrogen tetrachloroaurate (III) trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O), hydrated hexachloroplatinic (IV) acid (H2PtCl6·6H2O), silver nitrate (AgNO3), Palladium chloride (PdCl2) trisodium citrate (C6H5Na3O7·2H2O), poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) (PVP; K=30,  MW=40000), and all other chemicals used were of analytical grade and the chemicals were purchased from HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (Mumbai, India). All chemicals were used as received without further purification. Conductivity water was used in all experiments.


### 2.2. Synthesis of Trimetallic Nanoparticles

The Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites and Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes are prepared by MW irradiation method. This procedure was carried out in an MW oven (LG Grill, Intellowave, 160–800 W, consumption 800 W, output power 320 W, and frequency 2450 MHz) operating in a cyclic mode (ON 15 s, OFF 5 s) to prevent intense boiling of sol as well as aggregation. As synthesized trimetallic nanoparticles were sonicated in a Fast Clean-Ultrasonicator.


#### 2.2.1. Synthesis of Au-Pt-Ag Trimetallic Nanocomposites

Citrate-stabilized Au nanoparticles were prepared according to the reported method by us [16]. Briefly, 10 mL of aqueous 0.1% HAuCl4·3H2O was heated to a boiling and 2 mL of 1% trisodium citrate was then added with stirring. The reaction mixture was heated for 4 min (240 sec) and cooled to room temperature. The solution was turned to vivid magenta from slight yellow, indicating the formation of Au nanoparticles. 10 mL of 0.1% H2PtCl6·6H2O was then added to the Au nanoparticles followed by the addition of 2 mL 1% trisodium citrate with stirring. Finally 10 mL of 0.1% AgNO3 was added into the Au/Pt nanoparticles. The overall reaction time for the preparation of trimetallic nanocomposites are 420 sec. Then the prepared sol was sonicated for 1 hr.


#### 2.2.2. Synthesis of Au-Pd-Pt Trimetallic Nanotubes

In atypical synthesis of Pd containing trimetallic nanotubes, 45 mL of aqueous 1.20 mM HAuCl4·3H2O was heated to a boil and 2 mL of 1% trisodium citrate was then added with stirring. The reaction mixture was heated for 4 min (240 s) and cooled to room temperature. The solution was turned to vivid magenta from slight yellow, indicating the formation of Au nanoparticles. 3 mL of 1% PVP was then added to the solution and stirred at room temperature overnight. The prepared sol was sonicated for 40 min. Deaerated aqueous PdCl2 (2.0 mL of 35 mM) was added to PVP-stabilized Au nanoparticles, with stirring under nitrogen atmosphere (3 min). After 15 min 2.0 mL of a 1% trisodium citrate solution was again added dropwise to the solution with constant stirring. The vivid magenta coloured solution turned brown indicating the formation of nano-Pd on the PVP-stabilized Au nanoparticles. The stirring was continued for an additional 3 hr. Then 2.0 mL of 20 mM H2PtCl6·6H2O was added and the solution was stirred for another 2 hr at room temperature. Finally the prepared Au-Pd-Pt sol was sonicated for 1 hr to get the fine dispersion of nanoparticles.


### 2.3. Characterization of Nanoparticles

UV-vis (ultraviolet and visible light) absorbance spectra were measured over a range of 200–800 nm with a Shimadzu UV-1650PC recording spectrometer using a quartz cell with 10 mm of optical path length. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM), elementary dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) experiments were carried out on a FEI Quanta FEG 200 instrument with EDX analysis facility at 25°C. Wide-angle powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was recorded with an XPERT-PRO diffractometer equipped with monochromatic Cu Kα radiation by using a step scan programme.


## 2.1. Materials

Hydrogen tetrachloroaurate (III) trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O), hydrated hexachloroplatinic (IV) acid (H2PtCl6·6H2O), silver nitrate (AgNO3), Palladium chloride (PdCl2) trisodium citrate (C6H5Na3O7·2H2O), poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) (PVP; K=30,  MW=40000), and all other chemicals used were of analytical grade and the chemicals were purchased from HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (Mumbai, India). All chemicals were used as received without further purification. Conductivity water was used in all experiments.


## 2.2. Synthesis of Trimetallic Nanoparticles

The Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites and Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes are prepared by MW irradiation method. This procedure was carried out in an MW oven (LG Grill, Intellowave, 160–800 W, consumption 800 W, output power 320 W, and frequency 2450 MHz) operating in a cyclic mode (ON 15 s, OFF 5 s) to prevent intense boiling of sol as well as aggregation. As synthesized trimetallic nanoparticles were sonicated in a Fast Clean-Ultrasonicator.


### 2.2.1. Synthesis of Au-Pt-Ag Trimetallic Nanocomposites

Citrate-stabilized Au nanoparticles were prepared according to the reported method by us [16]. Briefly, 10 mL of aqueous 0.1% HAuCl4·3H2O was heated to a boiling and 2 mL of 1% trisodium citrate was then added with stirring. The reaction mixture was heated for 4 min (240 sec) and cooled to room temperature. The solution was turned to vivid magenta from slight yellow, indicating the formation of Au nanoparticles. 10 mL of 0.1% H2PtCl6·6H2O was then added to the Au nanoparticles followed by the addition of 2 mL 1% trisodium citrate with stirring. Finally 10 mL of 0.1% AgNO3 was added into the Au/Pt nanoparticles. The overall reaction time for the preparation of trimetallic nanocomposites are 420 sec. Then the prepared sol was sonicated for 1 hr.


### 2.2.2. Synthesis of Au-Pd-Pt Trimetallic Nanotubes

In atypical synthesis of Pd containing trimetallic nanotubes, 45 mL of aqueous 1.20 mM HAuCl4·3H2O was heated to a boil and 2 mL of 1% trisodium citrate was then added with stirring. The reaction mixture was heated for 4 min (240 s) and cooled to room temperature. The solution was turned to vivid magenta from slight yellow, indicating the formation of Au nanoparticles. 3 mL of 1% PVP was then added to the solution and stirred at room temperature overnight. The prepared sol was sonicated for 40 min. Deaerated aqueous PdCl2 (2.0 mL of 35 mM) was added to PVP-stabilized Au nanoparticles, with stirring under nitrogen atmosphere (3 min). After 15 min 2.0 mL of a 1% trisodium citrate solution was again added dropwise to the solution with constant stirring. The vivid magenta coloured solution turned brown indicating the formation of nano-Pd on the PVP-stabilized Au nanoparticles. The stirring was continued for an additional 3 hr. Then 2.0 mL of 20 mM H2PtCl6·6H2O was added and the solution was stirred for another 2 hr at room temperature. Finally the prepared Au-Pd-Pt sol was sonicated for 1 hr to get the fine dispersion of nanoparticles.


## 2.2.1. Synthesis of Au-Pt-Ag Trimetallic Nanocomposites

Citrate-stabilized Au nanoparticles were prepared according to the reported method by us [16]. Briefly, 10 mL of aqueous 0.1% HAuCl4·3H2O was heated to a boiling and 2 mL of 1% trisodium citrate was then added with stirring. The reaction mixture was heated for 4 min (240 sec) and cooled to room temperature. The solution was turned to vivid magenta from slight yellow, indicating the formation of Au nanoparticles. 10 mL of 0.1% H2PtCl6·6H2O was then added to the Au nanoparticles followed by the addition of 2 mL 1% trisodium citrate with stirring. Finally 10 mL of 0.1% AgNO3 was added into the Au/Pt nanoparticles. The overall reaction time for the preparation of trimetallic nanocomposites are 420 sec. Then the prepared sol was sonicated for 1 hr.


## 2.2.2. Synthesis of Au-Pd-Pt Trimetallic Nanotubes

In atypical synthesis of Pd containing trimetallic nanotubes, 45 mL of aqueous 1.20 mM HAuCl4·3H2O was heated to a boil and 2 mL of 1% trisodium citrate was then added with stirring. The reaction mixture was heated for 4 min (240 s) and cooled to room temperature. The solution was turned to vivid magenta from slight yellow, indicating the formation of Au nanoparticles. 3 mL of 1% PVP was then added to the solution and stirred at room temperature overnight. The prepared sol was sonicated for 40 min. Deaerated aqueous PdCl2 (2.0 mL of 35 mM) was added to PVP-stabilized Au nanoparticles, with stirring under nitrogen atmosphere (3 min). After 15 min 2.0 mL of a 1% trisodium citrate solution was again added dropwise to the solution with constant stirring. The vivid magenta coloured solution turned brown indicating the formation of nano-Pd on the PVP-stabilized Au nanoparticles. The stirring was continued for an additional 3 hr. Then 2.0 mL of 20 mM H2PtCl6·6H2O was added and the solution was stirred for another 2 hr at room temperature. Finally the prepared Au-Pd-Pt sol was sonicated for 1 hr to get the fine dispersion of nanoparticles.


## 2.3. Characterization of Nanoparticles

UV-vis (ultraviolet and visible light) absorbance spectra were measured over a range of 200–800 nm with a Shimadzu UV-1650PC recording spectrometer using a quartz cell with 10 mm of optical path length. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM), elementary dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) experiments were carried out on a FEI Quanta FEG 200 instrument with EDX analysis facility at 25°C. Wide-angle powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was recorded with an XPERT-PRO diffractometer equipped with monochromatic Cu Kα radiation by using a step scan programme.


## 3. Results and Discussion

The MW irradiation method for the preparation of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites and Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes is shown in Figures1 and 2. From the viewpoint of sequential electron transfer [17], we chose the combination of the trimetals. The ionization potentials of Au, Pt, Ag, and Pd are known to be 9.225, 8.620, 7.576, and 8.340 eV, respectively. Ionization energy of the corresponding bulk metals is also shown for the comparison in Figure 3 [18].Figure 1
MW irradiation method for the preparation of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanoparticles.Figure 2
MW irradiation method for the preparation of Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes.Figure 3
Ionization energy of the corresponding bulk metals.


### 3.1. UV-Vis Spectral Studies

#### 3.1.1. Au-Pt-Ag Trimetallic Nanocomposites

The absorbance spectrum of the sols containing various nanoparticles for the comparison has been given in Figure4. The absorbance studies have been carried out after ensuring complete reduction of the metal ions based on the kinetics of reduction of individual metal ions. Absorbance spectra corresponding to the individual Au, Pt, and Ag nanoparticles are also given for comparison. The absorption peak at 530 nm and 430 nm can be attributed to the surface plasmon absorption of Au and Ag nanoparticles (note that Pt colloids do not have an individual visible absorbance). The absence of peaks at 310 nm, characteristic of unreduced Au (III) ion, and peaks at 378, 460 nm indicates the complete reduction of Pt (IV) ion [19]. But, in the case of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites, a clear single absorbance at 528 nm was attributed to the surface plasmon resonance of trimetallic nanoparticles. The absence of multiple bands in the spectrum also rules out the presence of individual Au, Pt, and Ag nanoparticles in the dispersion [16].Figure 4
UV-vis spectrum of the colloidal dispersion of polymer protected Au nanoparticles.


#### 3.1.2. Au-Pd-Pt Trimetallic Nanotubes

Figure5 shows the UV-Vis spectrum of the colloidal dispersion of polymer protected Au nanoparticles (note that Pd and Pt colloids do not have an individual visible absorbance). A clear surface plasmon absorbance peak which appeared at 528 nm is corresponding to the presence of Au nanoparticles and the vivid magenta in colour sol also indicating the presence of Au nanoparticles.Figure 5
UV-vis spectrum of the colloidal dispersion of polymer protected Au nanoparticles.


### 3.2. High-Resolution Scanning Electron Microscopic (HR-SEM) Studies

#### 3.2.1. Au-Pt-Ag Trimetallic Nanocomposites

HR-SEM images indicate that the particles are nearly nanowires (Au) and nanocomposite (Ag-Pt) structure, the length of the nanowire is 792 nm and the width is 99 and 51 nm (Figure6(b)). From Figure 6(a), it is inferred that the nanocomposites are not well dispersed as individual nanoparticles and showed Au nanowires and Ag-Pt bimetallic nanoparticles. The length and width of the nanoparticles (Figure 6(b)) are indicated on the shape of the nanoparticles.A typical HR-SEM image of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites. Magnifications at (a) 12000x (20 kV) and (b) 20000x (20 kV). Scale bars (a) 4μm and (b) 1 μm.
(a)
(b)


#### 3.2.2. Au-Pd-Pt Trimetallic Nanotubes

Figure7 shows HR-SEM images of as-synthesized Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes. HR-SEM investigation clearly reveals that the nanoparticles were uniformly having nanotube shape. The length of the nanotube is 141 nm (Figure 7(b)) and width of that one is 152 nm.A typical HR-SEM image of Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes. Magnifications at (a) 2400x (30 kV) and (b) 7000x (30 kV). Scale bars (a) 20μm and (b) 10 μm.
(a)
(b)


### 3.3. Energy Dispersive X-Ray Microanalysis (EDX)

One of the most revealing analytical methods for the composition of trimetallic nanoparticle is energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Figures8 and 9 show the EDX elemental analysis of as-synthesized Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites and Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes. All the K and L emission peaks for trimetals are observed. The carbon and copper peaks are due to the HR-SEM holding grid. No other obvious peak attributable to impurity is detected. This result indicates that as-synthesized product is composed of high purity trimetallic nanoparticles. The carbon and oxygen signals were most likely due to the reducing agents on the surface of the prepared nanoparticles. EDX analysis of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites gave weight of 11.39% Au, 26.86% Pt, and 10.23% Ag in the sample. It indicated the formation of trimetallic nanocomposites in the ratio of  1 : 3 : 1. For Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes EDX analysis gave 6.25% Au, 25.18% Pd, and 27.01% Pt. It indicated the formation of trimetallic nanotubes in the ratio of 1 : 4 : 4. From the above results, the maximum percentage of Pt nanoparticles is present on the surface of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites and Pd and Pt nanoparticles are present on the surface of as-synthesised Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes.Figure 8
EDX elemental data of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites.Figure 9
EDX elemental data of Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes.


### 3.4. XRD Studies

The diffractograms of the trimetallic combinations generally show broad bands while their monometallic counterparts exhibit fairly sharp bands [19]. The particle sizes of the trimetallic combinations determined from the XRD spectra correlate well with the sizes obtained from HR-SEM measurements. The particle size is calculated based on the Scherrer’s equation:
(1)D=KλβsCosθ,
where D corresponds to the particle size, K is the shape-dependent Scherrer’s constant, λ is the wavelength of radiation, βs is the full peak width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the peak, and θ is the Bragg diffraction angle [20].


#### 3.4.1. Au-Pt-Ag Trimetallic Nanocomposites

Figure10 shows the XRD of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites. The diffraction patterns indicate a broad diffraction peak (2θ about 45.4°) corresponding to (2 0 0) reflection. This suggested that the prepared particles have a very small size and a face-centered cubic (fcc) structure. The XRD also indicated the reflection peak that appears at 38.12° (2θ) corresponds to the (1 1 1) crystallographic plane and the peak at 64.83° (2θ) corresponds to the (2 2 0) plane. The diffractograms show that (3 1 1) crystallographic surface is marked for Pt (2θ=75.29°). The above crystalline data are verified by JCPDS card number of Au, Pt, and Ag. Table 1 shows the crystalline sizes of nanoparticles and identification of nanoparticles present in trimetallic nanocomposites.Table 1
The crystalline sizes of nanoparticles and identification of nanoparticles present in Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites.
Sl. no.
2 Theta (°)
d (A)
FWHM (deg)
Crystalline size (nm)
1
38.12
2.27293
0.49
3.66
2
45.40
2.00579
0.20
4.25
3
64.83
1.94330
0.79
4.79
4
75.29
1.26514
0.59
7.85Figure 10
Wide-angle XRD pattern of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites.


#### 3.4.2. Au-Pd-Pt Trimetallic Nanotubes

Figure11 shows the XRD pattern of Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes. The wide-angle XRD pattern showed randomly oriented fcc crystals. A diffraction peak which appeared at 2θ=45.17° and 75.02° corresponds to Au (2 0 0) and Au (3 1 1) planes. The XRD also indicated that the reflection peaks that appeared at 2θ=39.62°, 46.68°, and 75.32° ascribed to Pd/Pt (1 1 1), Pd/Pt (2 0 0), and Pd/Pt (3 1 1) planes. Owing to the lattice mismatch factor [21], it was very difficult to resolve the peaks for Pd and Pt in the XRD pattern, whereas the peaks of Au and Pd/Pt could be readily distinguished by XRD. Table 2 shows the crystalline sizes of nanoparticles and the identification of nanoparticles present in trimetallic nanotubes. From all of the above above observation, Au in the prepared Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes was confirmed as forming inner core.Table 2
The crystalline sizes of nanoparticles and identification of nanoparticles present in Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes.
Sl. no
2 Theta (°)
d (A)
FWHM (deg)
Crystalline size (nm)
1
39.62
2.27293
0.500
3.67
2
45.17
2.00579
0.304
4.80
3
46.68
1.94330
0.110
4.33
4
75.02
1.26514
0.310
7.47Figure 11
Wide-angle XRD pattern of Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes.


### 3.5. Surface Energy

The surface energy of selected 4d and 5d metals is given in Table3. In addition to that cohesive energy and atomic radius are also tabulated. From this viewpoint, Pt has more surface energy compared with Au, Ag, and Pd. So, it is one of the reasons for Pt is present on the surface. Surface energy, cohesive energy, and atomic radius are shown for comparison (Figure 12) of Au, Pt, Ag, and Pd metals.Table 3
Surface energy, cohesive energy and atomic radius of the Au, Pt, Ag and Pd metals.
Property
Au
Pt
Ag
Pd
Surface energy
0.72 eV
0.98 eV
0.50 eV
0.77 eV
Cohesive energy
3.81 eV/atom
5.84 eV/atom
2.95 eV/atom
3.89 eV/atom
Atomic radius
136 pm
136 pm
145 pm
139 pmFigure 12
Surface energy, cohesive energy, and atomic radius are shown for comparison of Au, Pt, Ag, and Pd metals.


## 3.1. UV-Vis Spectral Studies

### 3.1.1. Au-Pt-Ag Trimetallic Nanocomposites

The absorbance spectrum of the sols containing various nanoparticles for the comparison has been given in Figure4. The absorbance studies have been carried out after ensuring complete reduction of the metal ions based on the kinetics of reduction of individual metal ions. Absorbance spectra corresponding to the individual Au, Pt, and Ag nanoparticles are also given for comparison. The absorption peak at 530 nm and 430 nm can be attributed to the surface plasmon absorption of Au and Ag nanoparticles (note that Pt colloids do not have an individual visible absorbance). The absence of peaks at 310 nm, characteristic of unreduced Au (III) ion, and peaks at 378, 460 nm indicates the complete reduction of Pt (IV) ion [19]. But, in the case of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites, a clear single absorbance at 528 nm was attributed to the surface plasmon resonance of trimetallic nanoparticles. The absence of multiple bands in the spectrum also rules out the presence of individual Au, Pt, and Ag nanoparticles in the dispersion [16].Figure 4
UV-vis spectrum of the colloidal dispersion of polymer protected Au nanoparticles.


### 3.1.2. Au-Pd-Pt Trimetallic Nanotubes

Figure5 shows the UV-Vis spectrum of the colloidal dispersion of polymer protected Au nanoparticles (note that Pd and Pt colloids do not have an individual visible absorbance). A clear surface plasmon absorbance peak which appeared at 528 nm is corresponding to the presence of Au nanoparticles and the vivid magenta in colour sol also indicating the presence of Au nanoparticles.Figure 5
UV-vis spectrum of the colloidal dispersion of polymer protected Au nanoparticles.


## 3.1.1. Au-Pt-Ag Trimetallic Nanocomposites

The absorbance spectrum of the sols containing various nanoparticles for the comparison has been given in Figure4. The absorbance studies have been carried out after ensuring complete reduction of the metal ions based on the kinetics of reduction of individual metal ions. Absorbance spectra corresponding to the individual Au, Pt, and Ag nanoparticles are also given for comparison. The absorption peak at 530 nm and 430 nm can be attributed to the surface plasmon absorption of Au and Ag nanoparticles (note that Pt colloids do not have an individual visible absorbance). The absence of peaks at 310 nm, characteristic of unreduced Au (III) ion, and peaks at 378, 460 nm indicates the complete reduction of Pt (IV) ion [19]. But, in the case of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites, a clear single absorbance at 528 nm was attributed to the surface plasmon resonance of trimetallic nanoparticles. The absence of multiple bands in the spectrum also rules out the presence of individual Au, Pt, and Ag nanoparticles in the dispersion [16].Figure 4
UV-vis spectrum of the colloidal dispersion of polymer protected Au nanoparticles.


## 3.1.2. Au-Pd-Pt Trimetallic Nanotubes

Figure5 shows the UV-Vis spectrum of the colloidal dispersion of polymer protected Au nanoparticles (note that Pd and Pt colloids do not have an individual visible absorbance). A clear surface plasmon absorbance peak which appeared at 528 nm is corresponding to the presence of Au nanoparticles and the vivid magenta in colour sol also indicating the presence of Au nanoparticles.Figure 5
UV-vis spectrum of the colloidal dispersion of polymer protected Au nanoparticles.


## 3.2. High-Resolution Scanning Electron Microscopic (HR-SEM) Studies

### 3.2.1. Au-Pt-Ag Trimetallic Nanocomposites

HR-SEM images indicate that the particles are nearly nanowires (Au) and nanocomposite (Ag-Pt) structure, the length of the nanowire is 792 nm and the width is 99 and 51 nm (Figure6(b)). From Figure 6(a), it is inferred that the nanocomposites are not well dispersed as individual nanoparticles and showed Au nanowires and Ag-Pt bimetallic nanoparticles. The length and width of the nanoparticles (Figure 6(b)) are indicated on the shape of the nanoparticles.A typical HR-SEM image of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites. Magnifications at (a) 12000x (20 kV) and (b) 20000x (20 kV). Scale bars (a) 4μm and (b) 1 μm.
(a)
(b)


### 3.2.2. Au-Pd-Pt Trimetallic Nanotubes

Figure7 shows HR-SEM images of as-synthesized Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes. HR-SEM investigation clearly reveals that the nanoparticles were uniformly having nanotube shape. The length of the nanotube is 141 nm (Figure 7(b)) and width of that one is 152 nm.A typical HR-SEM image of Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes. Magnifications at (a) 2400x (30 kV) and (b) 7000x (30 kV). Scale bars (a) 20μm and (b) 10 μm.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2.1. Au-Pt-Ag Trimetallic Nanocomposites

HR-SEM images indicate that the particles are nearly nanowires (Au) and nanocomposite (Ag-Pt) structure, the length of the nanowire is 792 nm and the width is 99 and 51 nm (Figure6(b)). From Figure 6(a), it is inferred that the nanocomposites are not well dispersed as individual nanoparticles and showed Au nanowires and Ag-Pt bimetallic nanoparticles. The length and width of the nanoparticles (Figure 6(b)) are indicated on the shape of the nanoparticles.A typical HR-SEM image of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites. Magnifications at (a) 12000x (20 kV) and (b) 20000x (20 kV). Scale bars (a) 4μm and (b) 1 μm.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2.2. Au-Pd-Pt Trimetallic Nanotubes

Figure7 shows HR-SEM images of as-synthesized Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes. HR-SEM investigation clearly reveals that the nanoparticles were uniformly having nanotube shape. The length of the nanotube is 141 nm (Figure 7(b)) and width of that one is 152 nm.A typical HR-SEM image of Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes. Magnifications at (a) 2400x (30 kV) and (b) 7000x (30 kV). Scale bars (a) 20μm and (b) 10 μm.
(a)
(b)


## 3.3. Energy Dispersive X-Ray Microanalysis (EDX)

One of the most revealing analytical methods for the composition of trimetallic nanoparticle is energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Figures8 and 9 show the EDX elemental analysis of as-synthesized Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites and Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes. All the K and L emission peaks for trimetals are observed. The carbon and copper peaks are due to the HR-SEM holding grid. No other obvious peak attributable to impurity is detected. This result indicates that as-synthesized product is composed of high purity trimetallic nanoparticles. The carbon and oxygen signals were most likely due to the reducing agents on the surface of the prepared nanoparticles. EDX analysis of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites gave weight of 11.39% Au, 26.86% Pt, and 10.23% Ag in the sample. It indicated the formation of trimetallic nanocomposites in the ratio of  1 : 3 : 1. For Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes EDX analysis gave 6.25% Au, 25.18% Pd, and 27.01% Pt. It indicated the formation of trimetallic nanotubes in the ratio of 1 : 4 : 4. From the above results, the maximum percentage of Pt nanoparticles is present on the surface of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites and Pd and Pt nanoparticles are present on the surface of as-synthesised Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes.Figure 8
EDX elemental data of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites.Figure 9
EDX elemental data of Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes.


## 3.4. XRD Studies

The diffractograms of the trimetallic combinations generally show broad bands while their monometallic counterparts exhibit fairly sharp bands [19]. The particle sizes of the trimetallic combinations determined from the XRD spectra correlate well with the sizes obtained from HR-SEM measurements. The particle size is calculated based on the Scherrer’s equation:
(1)D=KλβsCosθ,
where D corresponds to the particle size, K is the shape-dependent Scherrer’s constant, λ is the wavelength of radiation, βs is the full peak width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the peak, and θ is the Bragg diffraction angle [20].


### 3.4.1. Au-Pt-Ag Trimetallic Nanocomposites

Figure10 shows the XRD of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites. The diffraction patterns indicate a broad diffraction peak (2θ about 45.4°) corresponding to (2 0 0) reflection. This suggested that the prepared particles have a very small size and a face-centered cubic (fcc) structure. The XRD also indicated the reflection peak that appears at 38.12° (2θ) corresponds to the (1 1 1) crystallographic plane and the peak at 64.83° (2θ) corresponds to the (2 2 0) plane. The diffractograms show that (3 1 1) crystallographic surface is marked for Pt (2θ=75.29°). The above crystalline data are verified by JCPDS card number of Au, Pt, and Ag. Table 1 shows the crystalline sizes of nanoparticles and identification of nanoparticles present in trimetallic nanocomposites.Table 1
The crystalline sizes of nanoparticles and identification of nanoparticles present in Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites.
Sl. no.
2 Theta (°)
d (A)
FWHM (deg)
Crystalline size (nm)
1
38.12
2.27293
0.49
3.66
2
45.40
2.00579
0.20
4.25
3
64.83
1.94330
0.79
4.79
4
75.29
1.26514
0.59
7.85Figure 10
Wide-angle XRD pattern of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites.


### 3.4.2. Au-Pd-Pt Trimetallic Nanotubes

Figure11 shows the XRD pattern of Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes. The wide-angle XRD pattern showed randomly oriented fcc crystals. A diffraction peak which appeared at 2θ=45.17° and 75.02° corresponds to Au (2 0 0) and Au (3 1 1) planes. The XRD also indicated that the reflection peaks that appeared at 2θ=39.62°, 46.68°, and 75.32° ascribed to Pd/Pt (1 1 1), Pd/Pt (2 0 0), and Pd/Pt (3 1 1) planes. Owing to the lattice mismatch factor [21], it was very difficult to resolve the peaks for Pd and Pt in the XRD pattern, whereas the peaks of Au and Pd/Pt could be readily distinguished by XRD. Table 2 shows the crystalline sizes of nanoparticles and the identification of nanoparticles present in trimetallic nanotubes. From all of the above above observation, Au in the prepared Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes was confirmed as forming inner core.Table 2
The crystalline sizes of nanoparticles and identification of nanoparticles present in Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes.
Sl. no
2 Theta (°)
d (A)
FWHM (deg)
Crystalline size (nm)
1
39.62
2.27293
0.500
3.67
2
45.17
2.00579
0.304
4.80
3
46.68
1.94330
0.110
4.33
4
75.02
1.26514
0.310
7.47Figure 11
Wide-angle XRD pattern of Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes.


## 3.4.1. Au-Pt-Ag Trimetallic Nanocomposites

Figure10 shows the XRD of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites. The diffraction patterns indicate a broad diffraction peak (2θ about 45.4°) corresponding to (2 0 0) reflection. This suggested that the prepared particles have a very small size and a face-centered cubic (fcc) structure. The XRD also indicated the reflection peak that appears at 38.12° (2θ) corresponds to the (1 1 1) crystallographic plane and the peak at 64.83° (2θ) corresponds to the (2 2 0) plane. The diffractograms show that (3 1 1) crystallographic surface is marked for Pt (2θ=75.29°). The above crystalline data are verified by JCPDS card number of Au, Pt, and Ag. Table 1 shows the crystalline sizes of nanoparticles and identification of nanoparticles present in trimetallic nanocomposites.Table 1
The crystalline sizes of nanoparticles and identification of nanoparticles present in Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites.
Sl. no.
2 Theta (°)
d (A)
FWHM (deg)
Crystalline size (nm)
1
38.12
2.27293
0.49
3.66
2
45.40
2.00579
0.20
4.25
3
64.83
1.94330
0.79
4.79
4
75.29
1.26514
0.59
7.85Figure 10
Wide-angle XRD pattern of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites.


## 3.4.2. Au-Pd-Pt Trimetallic Nanotubes

Figure11 shows the XRD pattern of Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes. The wide-angle XRD pattern showed randomly oriented fcc crystals. A diffraction peak which appeared at 2θ=45.17° and 75.02° corresponds to Au (2 0 0) and Au (3 1 1) planes. The XRD also indicated that the reflection peaks that appeared at 2θ=39.62°, 46.68°, and 75.32° ascribed to Pd/Pt (1 1 1), Pd/Pt (2 0 0), and Pd/Pt (3 1 1) planes. Owing to the lattice mismatch factor [21], it was very difficult to resolve the peaks for Pd and Pt in the XRD pattern, whereas the peaks of Au and Pd/Pt could be readily distinguished by XRD. Table 2 shows the crystalline sizes of nanoparticles and the identification of nanoparticles present in trimetallic nanotubes. From all of the above above observation, Au in the prepared Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes was confirmed as forming inner core.Table 2
The crystalline sizes of nanoparticles and identification of nanoparticles present in Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes.
Sl. no
2 Theta (°)
d (A)
FWHM (deg)
Crystalline size (nm)
1
39.62
2.27293
0.500
3.67
2
45.17
2.00579
0.304
4.80
3
46.68
1.94330
0.110
4.33
4
75.02
1.26514
0.310
7.47Figure 11
Wide-angle XRD pattern of Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes.


## 3.5. Surface Energy

The surface energy of selected 4d and 5d metals is given in Table3. In addition to that cohesive energy and atomic radius are also tabulated. From this viewpoint, Pt has more surface energy compared with Au, Ag, and Pd. So, it is one of the reasons for Pt is present on the surface. Surface energy, cohesive energy, and atomic radius are shown for comparison (Figure 12) of Au, Pt, Ag, and Pd metals.Table 3
Surface energy, cohesive energy and atomic radius of the Au, Pt, Ag and Pd metals.
Property
Au
Pt
Ag
Pd
Surface energy
0.72 eV
0.98 eV
0.50 eV
0.77 eV
Cohesive energy
3.81 eV/atom
5.84 eV/atom
2.95 eV/atom
3.89 eV/atom
Atomic radius
136 pm
136 pm
145 pm
139 pmFigure 12
Surface energy, cohesive energy, and atomic radius are shown for comparison of Au, Pt, Ag, and Pd metals.


## 4. Conclusions

In conclusion, for the first time, simple MW-irradiated syntheses of Au-Pt-Ag trimetallic nanocomposites and Au-Pd-Pt trimetallic nanotubes are reported. The UV-visible and HR-SEM confirmed the formation of nanocomposites and nanotube-shaped nanoparticles. EDX analysis confirmed that the percentage of Pt is maximum on the surface of trimetallic nanoparticles and nanotubes. XRD crystal data revealed that the particles are very small in size. The results reported here will inspire the further design of multilayered metallic nanoparticles.



---

*Source: 168916-2013-02-28.xml*