# Effects of pH, Photoperiod, and Nutrient on Germination and Growth ofCalymperes erosum C. Muell. Gemmaling

Authors: Anthony Zinno Ogbimi; Yetunde Biodun Owoeye; Victor Oluwaseyi Ibiyemi; Akpos Valentino Bofede
Journal: Journal of Botany
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Effects of pH, photoperiod, and substrate nutrient concentration on the rate of germination of the gemmae and primary protonema growth ofCalymperes erosum C. Muell. were studied. There was a statistically significant difference in germination ofC. erosumgemmae and protonema growth among the different substrate pH levels, photoperiod treatments, and substrate nutrient conditions, respectively (P
<
0.01). Gemmae germination and protonemal growth peaked at pH 4 and 5. Protonemal growth was retarded at pH 2, 3, 6, and 7. No germination was observed in continuous darkness. Germination and protonema growth increased significantly (P
<
0.01) within the first 3 and 6 hours of daylight but not again until after 9 and 12 hours of exposure, respectively. No statistical (P
>
0.05) increase in germination and protonemal growth was observed when the nutrient concentration was increased from 25% to 200%. Results indicate the moss is adapted to low nutrients and that it may germinate well at substrate pH as low as 2 howbeit the probability of establishment will remain limited until pH levels improve to 4 or 5. Furthermore, the moss is able to achieve net photosynthetic carbon gain during morning hours. Recovery from photoinhibition is likely by evening.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Plants being mostly immobile generally survive changes in seasons by having different life cycle stages that are adapted to different conditions. Bryophytes are able to react quickly to climatic flux due to their short life cycle and the ease with which they disperse their spores [1]. Although spores are their means of sexual reproduction, asexual propagules are now being considered to play significant role in reproduction in mosses [2–7].Species of the Calymperaceae are widespread, occurring in the tropical and subtropical zones of the world [8]. In the humid forest of West Tropical Africa the genusCalymperes occurs mostly as epiphytes where it produces both gemmiferous and nongemmiferous leaves [9]. While gemmae are produced freely, sporophytes in this moss are reported to be rare [9]. Propagules of the moss become detached from the parent plant and are dispersed onto a spectrum of substrates and environmental conditions, where a few germinate and grow into new leafy gametophores [8].A combination of factors control growth in plants. Abiotic factors such as pH level, photoperiod, and nutrient could have profound influence on the establishment of asexual propagules such as gemmae. For example, naturally occurring concentrations of humic acid reduced spore germination and retarded bud formation inFunaria hygrometrica [10] and spores ofBartramidula bartramioides germinated best in continuous light [11]. This study was undertaken to determine the effects of pH, photoperiod, and nutrient availability on the establishment ofCalymperes erosum C. Muell. gemmae.


## 2. Materials and Methods

Calymperes erosum shoots with mature gemmae were taken from their natural population on aTerminalia catappa host tree at the Obafemi Awolowo University Campus, Ile-Ife (07°31′07.2′′ N, 04°31′34.4′′ E). The shoots were placed in a brown envelop and taken to the laboratory for further studies.


### 2.1. pH Effect

Liquid medium was prepared using normal strength Knop’s solution [12]. Equal portions of the solution were added into separate conical flasks and their pH was adjusted to pH values of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, respectively. The pH of the medium was adjusted by dropwise addition of 0.1 N HCl or 0.1 N NaOH and verified with a pH meter (Kent EIL 7055). The medium was then autoclaved at 15 psi for 15 minutes. The medium was then added into appropriately labeled Petri dishes. Gemmiferous leaves were carefully removed from their shoots and sterilized in 0.1% hypochlorite solution for one minute. The gemmae were then sown on the liquid medium in the Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were then covered and placed on the window sill of the laboratory at room temperature of 28 ± 2°C. The quantity of light over the area, measured at three-hour intervals, is presented in Table 1.Table 1
Quantity of natural light over the area, measured every three hours. SD represents standard deviation.
Quantity of light (µmoles/m2/s) ± SD
6 am (0 hours)
9 am (3 hours)
12 noon (6 hours)
3 pm (9 hours)
6 pm (12 hours)
9 pm
0.19 ± 0.05
816 ± 32
2564 ± 104
2339 ± 96
305 ± 9
0.006 ± 0.004


### 2.2. Photoperiod Effect

Knop’s solution [12] with pH value of 4, as prepared above, was used in this experiment. Some quantity of the medium was added into appropriately labeled Petri dishes. Gemmae, sterilized as above, were sown on the liquid medium in the Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were subjected to treatments of 0 hours (complete darkness throughout), 3 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, and 12 hours of natural day light, and control, respectively, at room temperature of 28 ± 2°C. The control experiment was allowed natural day light, without any form of artificial exclusion or addition of light throughout the period of the experiment. The quantity of light over the area, measured at three-hour intervals, is presented in Table 1. Black, opaque polyethylene bags were used, per treatment, to exclude light from the culture as per their respective treatments. Assessment of the sown gemmae was done at the end of the experiment.


### 2.3. Nutrient Status Effect

Liquid medium of the following concentrations of Knop’s solution was used: 0%, 25%, 50%, 100%, and 200%. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5 and then autoclaved as above. Some quantity of the medium was then added into appropriately labeled Petri dishes and gemmae, sterilized as above, were then sown on the liquid medium in the Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were then covered and placed on the window sill of the laboratory at room temperature of 28 ± 2°C.Knop’s solution employed was made using 250 mgL−1 KH2PO4, 250 mgL−1 KCl, 250 mgL−1 MgSO4·7H2O, 1000 mgL−1 Ca(NO3)2, and a trace of FeCl3. Approximately 150 gemmae were sown per Petri dish. Three replicates per treatment were used in all the experiments. Direct microscopic count was used to assess development in the gemmae. The number of nongerminated and germinated gemmae and the length of the primary protonemata in ten microscopic fields per Petri dish were recorded. An ocular micrometer was used to measure the length of the primary protonema. Mean and standard error values were calculated and one-way ANOVA was used to test for differences in means among treatments of pH, photoperiod, and nutrient experiments, respectively. All observations were made using a dissecting microscope (SERIES 880, Swift Instruments International, Japan) and compound light microscope (XSZ-107BN, Olympus).


## 2.1. pH Effect

Liquid medium was prepared using normal strength Knop’s solution [12]. Equal portions of the solution were added into separate conical flasks and their pH was adjusted to pH values of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, respectively. The pH of the medium was adjusted by dropwise addition of 0.1 N HCl or 0.1 N NaOH and verified with a pH meter (Kent EIL 7055). The medium was then autoclaved at 15 psi for 15 minutes. The medium was then added into appropriately labeled Petri dishes. Gemmiferous leaves were carefully removed from their shoots and sterilized in 0.1% hypochlorite solution for one minute. The gemmae were then sown on the liquid medium in the Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were then covered and placed on the window sill of the laboratory at room temperature of 28 ± 2°C. The quantity of light over the area, measured at three-hour intervals, is presented in Table 1.Table 1
Quantity of natural light over the area, measured every three hours. SD represents standard deviation.
Quantity of light (µmoles/m2/s) ± SD
6 am (0 hours)
9 am (3 hours)
12 noon (6 hours)
3 pm (9 hours)
6 pm (12 hours)
9 pm
0.19 ± 0.05
816 ± 32
2564 ± 104
2339 ± 96
305 ± 9
0.006 ± 0.004


## 2.2. Photoperiod Effect

Knop’s solution [12] with pH value of 4, as prepared above, was used in this experiment. Some quantity of the medium was added into appropriately labeled Petri dishes. Gemmae, sterilized as above, were sown on the liquid medium in the Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were subjected to treatments of 0 hours (complete darkness throughout), 3 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, and 12 hours of natural day light, and control, respectively, at room temperature of 28 ± 2°C. The control experiment was allowed natural day light, without any form of artificial exclusion or addition of light throughout the period of the experiment. The quantity of light over the area, measured at three-hour intervals, is presented in Table 1. Black, opaque polyethylene bags were used, per treatment, to exclude light from the culture as per their respective treatments. Assessment of the sown gemmae was done at the end of the experiment.


## 2.3. Nutrient Status Effect

Liquid medium of the following concentrations of Knop’s solution was used: 0%, 25%, 50%, 100%, and 200%. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5 and then autoclaved as above. Some quantity of the medium was then added into appropriately labeled Petri dishes and gemmae, sterilized as above, were then sown on the liquid medium in the Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were then covered and placed on the window sill of the laboratory at room temperature of 28 ± 2°C.Knop’s solution employed was made using 250 mgL−1 KH2PO4, 250 mgL−1 KCl, 250 mgL−1 MgSO4·7H2O, 1000 mgL−1 Ca(NO3)2, and a trace of FeCl3. Approximately 150 gemmae were sown per Petri dish. Three replicates per treatment were used in all the experiments. Direct microscopic count was used to assess development in the gemmae. The number of nongerminated and germinated gemmae and the length of the primary protonemata in ten microscopic fields per Petri dish were recorded. An ocular micrometer was used to measure the length of the primary protonema. Mean and standard error values were calculated and one-way ANOVA was used to test for differences in means among treatments of pH, photoperiod, and nutrient experiments, respectively. All observations were made using a dissecting microscope (SERIES 880, Swift Instruments International, Japan) and compound light microscope (XSZ-107BN, Olympus).


## 3. Results

There was a statistically significant difference in germination ofC. erosum gemmae among the different substrate pH levels (Figure 1) as determined by one-way ANOVA (F
(
5,11
)
=
57.6; P
<
0.01). A Tukey post hoc test revealed that although rate of germination in the gemmae was not significantly different among substrates with pH values 2, 3, 4, and 5, it was however significantly reduced in substrates with pH 6 and 7, respectively. There was no statistical difference in germination between substrate of pH 6 and 7. There was a statistically significant difference in the primary protonemal growth (Figure 1) of the moss among the different substrate pH levels (F
(
5,12
)
=
19.1; P
<
0.01). The best growth in primary protonema occurred in medium of pH 4 and 5 and the growth at both pH levels was significantly higher than that in pH 2, 3, 6, and 7, respectively. There was no statistical difference in primary protonemal growth between pH levels 2 and 3 (P
=
0.992), 4 and 5 (P
=
1), and 6 and 7 (P
=
0.987).Figure 1
Effect of pH on gemmae germination (after 10 days) and growth of primary protonema (after 11 days) ofC. erosum. Points are means of three replicates. Vertical bars represent standard error. Values with the same alphabets along the same curve are not statistically different at 1% probability.Gemmae germination and primary protonema growth ofC. erosum under different photoperiods are shown in Figure 2. There was a statistically significant difference in germination ofC. erosum gemmae among the different exposure periods (Figure 2) as determined by one-way ANOVA (F
(
5,12
)
=
159.4; P
<
0.01). The post hoc test revealed that the first three hours of natural light improved, significantly, the germination percentage (50 ± 2.43; P
<
0.01) of the gemmae, which failed to germinate in continuous darkness during the period of the experiment. An additional three hours of exposure also resulted in a further significant increase in germination percentage (76.8 ± 6.7; P
<
0.01). Germination however failed to show further increase on extension of exposure to natural light up to 9 hours but improved when exposure was sustained up to 12 hours, resulting in 100% germination in the gemmae in 8 days.Figure 2
Effect of photoperiod on gemmae germination (after 8 days) and primary protonema growth (after 9 days) ofC. erosum. Points are means of three replicates. Vertical bars represent standard error. Values with the same alphabets along the same curve are not statistically different at 1% probability.Analysis of primary protonema growth under same conditions also revealed a statistically significant difference in the growth among the different exposure periods (F
(
5,11
)
=
707.4; P
<
0.01). While no primary protonema growth was observed in continuous darkness, exposure to the first 3 and 6 hours of natural daylight resulted in statistically significant growth of 20 ± 0.98 µm (P
<
0.01) and 25 ± 0.21 µm (P
<
0.01), respectively. Growth of primary protonema remained statistically unchanged in 9 and 12 hours of exposure but improved and increased significantly when exposure was sustained beyond 12 hours, as indicated by the control experiment.Figure3 shows gemmae germination and primary protonemal growth ofC. erosum in different nutrient concentrations. A one-way ANOVA (F
(
4,10
)
=
9.8; P
<
0.01) reveals that a statistically significant difference in germination ofC. erosum gemmae exists among substrate nutrient concentrations (Figure 3) howbeit a Tukey post hoc test revealed that this difference exists only between germination in distilled water (0%) and all the other nutrient conditions tested. While no germination was observed in distilled water, the lowest nutrient concentration (25%) used yielded a significant increase in germination percentage (58.5 ± 5.2; P
=
0.006). Increasing the nutrient concentration from 25% up to 200% did not result in statistically significant (P
>
0.05) increase in germination of the gemmae. Similarly, statistical analysis reveals a significant difference in protonema growth among the different nutrient conditions (F
(
4,10
)
=
44.3; P
<
0.01). No protonema were produced in distilled water (0%) and the 25% nutrient gave rise to a significantly (47.9 ± 3.4 µm; P
<
0.01) higher growth. The post hoc test shows that no further increase in protonema length occurred with increasing nutrient concentration from 25% up to 200%.Figure 3
Effect of nutrient concentration on gemmae germination (after 5 days) and primary protonema growth (after 6 days) ofC. erosum. Points are means of three replicates. Vertical bars represent standard error. Values with the same alphabets along the same curve are not statistically different at 1% probability.


## 4. Discussion

Germination and establishment are crucial stages in the life cycle of a plant [13, 14] especially for the bryophytes which must survive an array of habitat conditions mainly on only one set of chromosomes. Germination of bryophyte spores has been reported to be limited by habitat pH. While the spores ofFunaria hygrometrica andTetraplodon mnioides germinated best in alkaline substrates, being retarded by acidic pH [15], optimum germination and thallus growth of the liverworts,Plagiochasma appendiculatum andReboulia hemisphaerica occurred at pH of 6.0 [16]. This study shows that germination in the gemmae of the tropical mossC. erosum is limited by pH. The gemmae germinated best in acidic conditions, forming a peak at pH 4, but performed poorly at substrate pH values above 5 in this study. This finding is consistent with the report of Odu [9] on gemmae germination of two other tropical mosses in which he attributed the rapid spread ofBarbula indica to the high rate of gemmae germination of the moss which was, in turn, favoured by the alkaline nature of their substrate. Germination of the gemmae ofBryum nitens, in that report, was however suppressed by similar alkaline pH values but performed well in low pH.The gemmae of the tropicalC. erosum germinate to form filamentous protonemata. Elsewhere, inFunaria hygrometrica, reducing substrate pH to 5.5 resulted in the extension of the protonemal tip cells, whereas increasing the pH to 6.8 prevented further growth [10]. Also, inBuxbaumia viridis optimum protonemal growth occurred at pH 5 while that ofNeckera pennata was greatest at pH 6.5–7 [17]. In this study, however, optimum protonema growth occurred at pH range of 4-5, while higher pH values between 6 and 7 retarded growth significantly.The process of gemmae germination to protonema growth to formation of leafy shoots inC. erosum may require increasingly more specific conditions. Although pH 2 and 3 in this study resulted in very high germination figures, the poor primary protonemal growth at those values indicates that conditions suitable for germination are not necessarily conducive for protonema development. This observation is consistent with the report of Forman [18] that although spore germination inTetraphis pellucida requires a pH of 3.0–7.3, growth of the leafy shoot occurs in the much narrower pH range of 5.1–5.8. A similar observation was also made by Wiklund and Rydin [17] that low pH has a stronger effect on protonema growth than on spore germination.The observed effects of pH on the germination and protonema growth inC. erosum may be linked indirectly to its effects on the solubility and availability of certain ions in the substrate, resulting in toxic effects. For example, a high level of calcium is generally associated with high pH [10]. While calcium enhances germination inPlagiochasma appendiculatum [19] and promotes protonema production inStereophyllum radiculosum [20], it has been reported to depress germination inDicranella cerviculata [21].Studies on the effect of photoperiod on higher plants suggest that increased day length gave rise to more photosynthesis, resulting in longer stems and increased elongation rates [10]. In the mossBryum pseudotriquetrum, photoperiod affected development, requiring more than 5 hours of day length for spore germination and protonema growth [22]. In contrast with the tropical moss in this study, a significant gemmae germination and growth of primary protonema occurred in the moss when exposed to the first 3 and 6 hours of natural light, respectively. This observation indicates the moss is able to realize a net photosynthetic carbon gain during the first few hours of the day. Increasing exposure up to 12 hours did not give a better result. Photoinhibition, resulting from the daily variation in light intensity, is a likely culprit. The resumption of growth in primary protonema, when left in natural light beyond 12 hours, is indicative of a full recovery of the moss from photodestruction of pigments by late evening and possibly, an adaptation to high light intensity.The chlorophyllose gemmae ofC. erosum did not germinate in the dark, indicating further that the gemmae require light to germinate. This observation is consistent with the report onPolytrichum commune spores which germinated only in light or in darkness when sucrose is present [23]. This indicates the need for light is likely prompted by a need for energy, given also that any growth after germination will necessarily require energy. Earlier on, Szweykowska [24], after inducing bud formation inCeratodon purpureus in the dark, using kinetin, reported that kinetin gave rise to an effect similar to that of light. Thus the presence of light might be to induce the production of a cytokinin. However, since neither kinetin nor sucrose is light-sensitive, the involvement of a phytochrome-mediation is likely. This requirement of light for germination inC. erosum could be an adaptive strategy to ensure the gemmae remain where they have landed until conditions become suitable for further development thus preventing germination from occurring underground or under heavy leaf-litter, where light is completely absent.Field studies [25] indicate that germination inFunaria hygrometrica andCeratodon purpureus may be nutrient-limited. Earlier on, Arnaudow [26] reported thatDicranum scoparium spores failed to germinate in water, but when earth particles were added to the water, they germinated in two days. Also Olarinmoye [27], in a study onRadula flaccida, found that when grown in distilled water, the liverwort turned chlorotic and frail indicating the plant, most likely, was using nutrient reserves. The gemmae ofC. erosum in this study did not germinate in distilled water. This failure to germinate in distilled water is likely a survival strategy permitting them to remain in their new location until conditions become suitable for development.The moss under study attained as much germination and protonema growth with 25% nutrient as it did with all the other higher nutrient concentrations, indicatingC. erosum is adapted to low nutrient conditions. This observation is consistent with the report of Vitt [28] on some boreal mosses which exhibited no less productivity in poor fens than in nutrient-rich fens. Low nutrient requirements for optimum growth have also been reported for the liverwortRadula flaccid [27]. Several authors, in comparing bryophytes to other plants, have reported lower nutrient requirements for development in bryophytes than in other plants [29–35]. This adaptation to low nutrients could be linked to their ability to relocate soluble nutrients from older tissues to young and growing parts and is suggestive of the moss’ ability to survive in places rather inhabitable by other plants.This study has shown thatC. erosum gemmae are adapted to low nutrients and will not germinate or grow any faster in nutrient-rich substrate than in relatively lower nutrient conditions. It may germinate well at substrate pH as low as 2, but the probability of establishment will remain limited until pH level improves to 4 or 5. Gemmae that are completely covered by debris or litter have little chance of establishment if they germinate at all. Germination in the gemmae and protonema growth of the moss occur mostly during morning and late evening hours in this site. The study indicates moss is able to achieve net photosynthetic carbon gain during the morning hours and although afternoon light intensities may limit germination and protonemal growth, significant recovery is very likely by late evening.



---

*Source: 159457-2014-12-31.xml*