# The Completeness and Incompleteness of Financial Markets in Economies Driven by Diffusion Processes

Authors: Zheng Dou; Hao Liang
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

We investigate sufficient conditions for the completeness and incompleteness of financial markets with multiple goods and heterogeneous agents in continuous-time economies driven by diffusion processes. It is demonstrated that, under certain conditions, two types of utility functions lead to the incompleteness of markets, while the invertibility of the Jacobian matrix of dividend rates’ volatility in units of the numeraire good gives rise to the completeness of markets. In particular, it is shown that if a type of special utility functions is adopted, then the change of numeraire good leads to the conversion of completeness of markets.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The classical method to set up the equilibria of financial markets with heterogenous agents in continues-time economies is the innovative technique in Duffie [1]. The method is composed of three steps. The first step is to calculate the Arrow-Debreu equilibrium, the second is to give a definition of candidate stock prices by the pricing kernel or the consumption price process, and the last step is to confirm whether these stock prices make the markets complete or not. The most complicated step is the last one, because these candidate stock prices cannot be obtained in explicit form. Duffie [2] shows that the financial markets are complete if and only if the volatility matrix of stock prices is invertible almost everywhere. Anderson and Raimondo [3] demonstrate that if the volatility matrix of dividends at terminal time is nonsingular, then the candidate stock prices lead to completeness of the financial markets. The models in Anderson and Raimondo [3] require that the dividends of all stocks are paid at only terminal time. Hugonnier et al. [4] and Riedel and Herzberg [5] extend the work in Anderson and Raimondo [3] by getting rid of two of the curial assumptions and prove that, in most of the continuous-time economies, there exists the completeness of dynamic markets. Based on the results of Anderson and Raimondo [3], Hugonnier et al. [4], and Riedel and Herzberg [5], Kramkov and Predoiu [6] find weak conditions for the completeness of markets with only one consumption good.Ehling and Larsen [7] pay attention to conditions for the incompleteness of markets and get a class of utility function for incomplete financial markets in which stock prices follow the process of a geometric Brownian motion. Ehling and Larsen [7] demonstrate that this class of utility function leads to the incompleteness of markets.We extend parts of the results in Hugonnier et al. [4] and Ehling and Larsen [7]. Specifically, we present two types of utility functions that give rise to the incompleteness of financial markets. The first one is similar to that of Ehling and Larsen [7]. If the utility function satisfies a partial differential equation, we find that one of the stock prices is replicable. In other words, one of the stock prices is the linear combination of other stock prices. It brings about the incompleteness of financial markets. Solving the partial differential equation, we get the first type of utility functions that lead to the incompleteness of the markets. Using a similar method, if the utility function satisfies another differential equation and several conditions, we derive that certain risks in the economy will not appear in the stock prices, which also is conducive to the incompleteness of financial markets. A new sufficient condition for the incompleteness of the market is obtained. Examples are given to explain the inherent reason for the incompleteness of the markets. We derive that the incompleteness of markets in the second case depends on the choice of numeraire good, while the first case does not.Our results about the complete market are similar to Riedel and Herzberg [5], in which meaningful results about the completeness of markets in Radner equilibria are presented. They show that if the asset markets are potentially complete, there exist Radner equilibria with dynamically complete markets in continuous-time economies with a single consumption good, while we concentrate on multigood economies.The rest of the sections of this paper are organized as follows. In Section2, we construct the model of economy and calculate the diffusion coefficient matrix of the commodity prices and dividends in unit of the numeraire good. In Section 3, we present two conditions that lead to the incompleteness of financial markets and compare these two conditions. In Section 4, based on the calculations in Section 2, we give a sufficient condition for complete markets. We conclude our work in Section 5.


## 2. The Model

In this section, we give a basic setup for our continuous-time economy in which the time span is[0,T], where T is a finite number (our model originates from the macro-finance model in Duffie [8]). The risks in our model are represented by an N-dimensional Brownian motion Z=Z1,Z2,…,ZN⊤, which is constructed on a probability space (Ω,F,P,Ftt≥0).There are totalN+1 assets in our model which includes one risk-free bond and N stocks. The risk-free bond is risk-free in units of the numeraire good instead of money. All the stocks pay dividends continuously which are in units of corresponding good. Specifically, there are N stocks numbered as i=1,2,…,N, and they pay dividends in consumption good i at rate gi(X(t)), where gi(·) is a positive real analytic function and X(t) denotes the state variables, which is an N-dimensional vector with the following (we assume that all the equalities hold in the “everywhere (almost surely)” sense and all the stochastic processes are measurable):(1)dXt=μXXt,tdt+σXXt,tdZt,where μX:RN×[0,T]→RN,σX:RN×[0,T]→RN×N, and X(0)∈RN.The following assumptions are necessary for our analysis.Assumption 1 (see [7]).
r a n k ( σ X ( x , t ) ) = N for all (x,t)∈RN×[0,T].Assumption 2 (see [7]).
g i ( x ) ∈ C 2.From (1) and the above assumptions, we find that the volatility of dividend, which is denoted by σgi(t), is equal to ∂giXt/∂xσX(Xt,t), i.e., σgi(t)=σgi(X(t),t)≔∂giXt/∂xσX(Xt,t)(we write F(X(t),t) as F(t) sometimes for conciseness).To make sure that the uncertainty of the state variables spreads over all the dividends, which makes the market potentially complete, the next assumption is necessary.Assumption 3 (see [7]).
r a n k ∂ g X t / ∂ x σ X x , t = N, where g(X(t))=g1t,g2t,…,gNt.Letpi(t) be the price of good i at time t, and let pl(t)≡1 be the price of the numeraire good. Thus, we have the vector of prices P=p1,p2,…pl,…pN. The process of pi is given by(2)dpit=pitμpitdt+pitσpitdZt.From (2), we define the process of dividend rate in units of the numeraire good: g~i(t)=gi(t)pi(t).The price process of stocki is given by(3)dSit=SitμSiSit,tdt-g~itdt+SitσSiSit,tdZt.Note that the processes of stock pricesSi are different from those in Ehling and Larsen [7], in which the process of prices is subject to a geometric Brownian motion.The risk-free bond pays out in the numeraire good, and its price processB(t) is subject to(4)dBt=rtBtdt,where r is the risk-free rate and is determined endogenously in equilibrium.Letcik be the amount of good i consumed by agent k, and let the vector of consumption of agent k at time t be Ck(t)=c1kt,c2kt,…,cNkt, where k=1,2,…,K. We assume that the utility function of agent k is Uk with(5)UkCk=E∫0Te-ρtukCkτdτ,where ρ is a positive constant which means the discount rate of utility and uk is a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function.Assumption 4 (see [7]).
The utility functionuk:(0,∞)N→R is an increasing, strictly concave function in class C3 and satisfies the multidimensional Inada conditions.Assume thatWk(t) is the total wealth process of agent k in units of the numeraire good, and Wk(t)=αk(t)B(t)+πkt⊤S(t), where αk(t) represents the amount of the risk-free asset and πk(t)=π1kt,π2kt,…,πNkt⊤ denotes the amount of units of stocks held by agent k at time t. It is well known that the object of every individual agent is to maximize his own utility function under the limitation of his budget constraint. In other words, the wealth process of agent k must satisfy the dynamic budget constraint:(6)dWkt=Wktrtdt-Pt⊤Cktdt+πkt⊤IStμSSt,t-rt1N×1dt+πkt⊤IStσSSt,t)dZt,where IS(t) is an N×N matrix with Si(t) as element (i,i) and zero elsewhere and 1N×1 is an N-dimensional vector of ones.To study the completeness of the whole market, we begin with the social planner’s, or, equivalently, the government’s, problem, which is to give each agent a utility weightak,k=1,2,…,K, and maximize the weighted total utility of all agents. The problem is defined as follows.Definition 5 (see [7]).
The social planner’s problem is(7)ua,g=max∑k=1KCk=g⁡∑k=1KakukCk,where a={a1,a2,…,aK} is the K-dimensional unit simplex and means the Pareto weights.We cite the definition of the Arrow-Debreu equilibrium, which not only solves the social planner’s problem, but also needs that all agents’ individual consumption allocations are affordable if they have fixed initial wealth.Definition 6 (see [7]).
An Arrow-Debreu equilibrium is a state price densityξ, commodity prices P, and consumption allocations (Ck)k=1K such that the following statements hold:
(a) All agents maximize their expected utility function under their own static budget constraints:(8)
max
U
k
C
k
s
.
t
.
E
∫
0
T
ξ
τ
P
τ
⊤
C
k
τ
-
η
k
⊤
g
~
τ
d
τ
≤
0
,
k
=
1,2
,
…
,
K
,where ηk=η1kt,η2kt,…,ηNkt⊤ is initial allocation of stocks of agent k, and ∑1Kηi=1
(b) The commodity market clears:(9)∑k=1KCkt=gt
(c) The financial market clears:(10)∑k=1Kπkt=∑k=1Kηkt,∑k=1KπBkt=0,where πBk(t) is the risk-free bond held by agent kIf the vector of utility weighta is given, then the Arrow-Debreu equilibrium agrees with finding the allocations of initial wealth η which satisfy the maximization of (7) and the agents’ individual budget constraints.We know that the social planner’s problem is well defined no matter whether the financial market is complete or not. When we discuss the sufficient conditions for the incompleteness of financial markets in Section3, we commence with (7) and show that the candidate stock prices do not complete the market under certain conditions. In Section 4, we derive sufficient conditions for the invertibility of the volatility matrix of candidate stock prices. Under these conditions, the Arrow-Debreu equilibrium and complete market are achieved by trading stocks and the risk-free bond.Assumption 7 (see [7]).
(11) ∑ k = 1 K E ∫ 0 T e - ρ τ ∇ u k g τ K ⊤ g τ d τ < ∞ .Under the above assumptions, we are able to construct a concrete form of the state price density ξ(t) which is the discounted value of the social planner’s marginal utility. Thus, the good price pi is defined as the ratio of marginal utility of good i and marginal utility of the numeraire good l.Proposition 8 (see [7]).
There exists an Arrow-Debreu equilibrium in which the state price density is given by(12)ξt=e-ρt∂ua,gt∂gl,and the price vector P(t)=p1t,p2t,…,pNt⊤ is given by(13)Pt≡Pa,t=∇ua,gt∂ua,gt/∂gl.The elements of the vector of utility weights a are given by the solutions of(14)E∫0Tξa,τPa,τ⊤Cka,τ-ηk⊤g~a,τdτ=0,for k=1,2,…,K.Proof.
The proof follows that of Proposition 1 in Ehling and Larsen [7]. Here we omit the proof.In Proposition8, we find that the vector of commodity prices is a function of g(t), which is a stochastic process associated with Xt. Then we use the well-known Itô lemma to get the diffusion coefficient of the price vector P. We give the following lemma to illustrate this.Lemma 9.
The diffusion coefficient of the vector of commodity pricesσP(t) is given by(15)σPt=IPt-1εtσgt,where IP(t) is an N×N matrix with pi(t) as element (i,i) and zero elsewhere, σg(t) is the diffusion matrix of dividend rate vector g(t), and ε(t) is the Jacobian matrix of P(g), i.e.,(16)εt=∂p1∂g1∂p1∂g2⋯∂p1∂gN∂p2∂g1∂p2∂g2⋯∂p2∂gN⋮⋮⋱⋮∂pN∂g1∂pN∂g2⋯∂pN∂gN.Proof.
Note thatP(t)=∇u(a,g(t))/∂u(a,g(t))/∂gl and g(t) is a stochastic process. We apply Itô’s lemma to complete the proof.Using Itô’s lemma again, we get the following proposition.Proposition 10.
The diffusion coefficient of the process of dividend rate in units of the numeraire goodg~(t) is given by(17)σg~=Igεt+IP×σg,where Ig is an N×N matrix with gi(t) as element (i,i) and zero elsewhere.
Furthermore,σg~ is the product of the Jacobian matrix of g~(g) and the volatility matrix of dividends, σg, i.e.,(18)σg~=∂g~∂g×σg=∂g~1∂g1∂g~1∂g2⋯∂g~1∂gN∂g~2∂g1∂g~2∂g2⋯∂g~2∂gN⋮⋮⋱⋮∂g~N∂g1∂g~N∂g2⋯∂g~N∂gN×σg.Proof.
The proof is the direct calculations by applying Itô’s lemma to the consumption process in units of the numeraire. We find that the element(i,j) of the matrix σg~ is given by(19)σg~i,j=pi+gi∂pi∂gi=∂g~i∂gi×σgi=j,gi∂pi∂gj=∂g~i∂gj×σgi≠j,which is the Jacobian matrix of g~(g).Note that, in Assumption3, σg(g(Xt),t) is assumed to be invertible at all times. Thus, we deduce that g~(t) is invertible if and only if Ig(t)ε(t)+IP(t) or the Jacobian matrix ∂g~/∂g is invertible. In other words, even if the financial market is potentially complete, the market can be incomplete since ∂g~/∂g is noninvertible.In the Arrow-Debreu equilibrium, a reasonable form of stock prices is the expected discounted value of all the dividends that will be paid in the future:(20)Sit≡Et∫tTξτξtpigiXτdτ,i=1,2,…,N.


## 3. Incomplete Markets

In this section, we investigate sufficient conditions for the incompleteness of financial market that we mentioned in Section2.As is well known, the completeness of markets is closely linked with the volatilities of stock prices in a continuous-time model. Specifically, one can show that the volatility matrix of stock pricesσS is invertible if and only if the market is complete. Relatively, proving that the market is incomplete is equivalent to proving that the volatility matrix of stock prices σS is noninvertible (see Duffie [2] for more details). This gives us a concrete way to verify the completeness of the financial markets.Moreover, one can show that if anN×N matrix A is noninvertible, or, identically, A=0, then either of the following two conditions must be satisfied. Firstly, if all the vertical vectors of A are nonzero, then the transversal vectors of A are linearly dependent. Secondly, at least one of the vertical vectors is zero.If we regardσS as the matrix A, then we implicitly divide the incomplete markets into two cases corresponding to the two conditions above. The first one is that although stock prices carry on all the risks in the state variables Xt, at least one of the stocks is expressed as a linear combination of other stocks. This means that some stocks are replicable by using the portfolio that consists of other stocks, i.e., (21)Sit=∑j=1,j≠iNβjSjt,where i is an arbitrary natural number in [1,N] and βj∈R, for j=1,2,…,i-1,i+1,…,N, and they cannot all equal zero. In this case, σS must be noninvertible. Hence the financial market is incomplete. The second condition implies the case in which the financial market loses at least one sort of risks represented by a Brownian motion during the process in which the risks transfer from the state variables X(t) to the stock prices S(t). This inevitably causes that at least one of the vertical vectors in σS equals zero. Therefore, σS is noninvertible and the incompleteness of financial market emerges.In the first case, we emphasize that all the vertical vectors ofσS are nonzero. It is due to the fact that stock prices cannot be zero. Meanwhile, in the second case, we need that at least one of the vertical vectors is zero because we focus on the volatility of stock prices, which do not have to be nonzero.The rest of this section is dedicated to debating these two cases, respectively. We start with the first one.Lemma 11.
If the social planner’s utility functionu(t) and the vector of dividends rate g(t) satisfy the partial differential equation(22)∂ugt∂gigit=∑j=1,j≠iNβj∂ugt∂gjgjt,then the price of stock i is a linear combination of the prices of other stocks, i.e.,(23)Sit=∑j=1,j≠iNβjSjt.Thus, the financial market is incomplete.Proof.
We assume that the solution of (22) exists. Multiplying both sides of (22) by e-ρt and integrating from t to T, we get (24)∫tTe-ρτ∂ugτ∂gigiτdτ=∑j=1,j≠iN∫tTe-ρτβj∂ugt∂gjgjtdτ,and we take conditional expectation on both sides to obtain (25)Et∫tTe-ρτ∂ugτ∂gigiτdτ=∑j=1,j≠iNEt∫tTe-ρτβj∂ugt∂gjgjtdτ.Dividing the equation by ξ(t) and writing it as the candidate stock prices formula in (20), we get Si(t)=∑j=1,j≠iNβjSj(t).We find that (22) is a first-order partial differential equation. Solving this equation, we get Lemma 12.Lemma 12.
The general solution to (22) is(26)ug=φg1giβ1,g2giβ2,…,gi-1giβi-1,gi+1giβi+1,…,gNgiβN,where φ(·):RN-1→R and it is an arbitrary real analytic function such that u(·) satisfies Assumption 4.Proof.
Solving partial differential equation (22), we complete the proof.Now we present Conclusion13.Conclusion 13 (see [7]).
If the social planner’s utility functionu(g(t)) satisfies (26), then the financial market is incomplete.Proof.
Using Lemmas11 and 12, we complete the proof of Conclusion 13.Conclusion13 presents utility functions which make the financial markets incomplete. We can check the incompleteness of the financial market by verifying whether the social planner’s utility function from Definition 5 (see (7)) satisfies the condition in Conclusion 13. Comparing our method with the techniques which need to calculate the volatility matrix of stock prices for all time and states and check the invertibility of the matrix, we find that our method is not only easier but also more convenient.We give an example to illustrate this conclusion, which is different from that in Ehling and Larsen [7].Example 14.
Assume that there are three goods in the market, and the social planner’s utility function is(27)ug1t,g2t,g3t=g1βtg2β2tg3β3t,where β1,β2, and β3 are positive constants such that Assumption 4 holds. Let the first good be the numeraire. When the market achieves equilibrium, we get(28)p1t=1,p2t=β2β1g1tg2t,p3t=β3β1g1tg3t.Then we obtain that the dividends in units of the numeraire at time t are given by(29)g~1t=g1t,g~2t=β2β1g1t,g~3t=β3β1g1t.We see that dividend rates in units of good 1 are only related to g1(t). Specifically, they are all proportional to g~1(t) for all times and states of the economy. Therefore, we conclude that stock 2 and stock 3 are colinear with stock 1 in the sense of candidate stock price. This gives rise to the incompleteness of financial market. Practically, if we let good 2 or 3 be the numeraire good, instead of good 1, then we find that the financial market is incomplete too.
To apply Conclusion13, we change the social planner’s utility function into(30)ug1t,g2t,g3t=g2tg1β1/2β2tβ2g3tg1β1/2β3tβ3(31)=φg2tg1tα1,g3tg1tα2,where φ(x,y)=xy,α1=β1/2β2,α2=β1/2β3. Therefore, Conclusion 13 is available and brief to demonstrate that the financial market is incomplete.As we see in Example14, one can check whether the utility function leads to the incomplete market or not by applying Conclusion 13. This method is also useful to verify that the financial model in Serrat [9] is incomplete, in which the Cobb-Douglas utility function is adopted to describe the market.Conclusion13 gives a sufficient, while not necessary, condition for the first situation that leads to the incompleteness of financial markets. We note that it is hard to find a both necessary and sufficient condition for the incompleteness market since g(t) in (22) is a vector of stochastic processes, and the equality holds in the “almost surely” sense. That is to say, if u(g(t)) satisfies (22), then the measure of ∂u(g(t))/∂gigi(t)≠∑j=1,j≠iNβj∂u(g(t))/∂gjgj(t) is zero. While (23) is a function of expectation, it still holds without the condition that the measure of ∂u(g(t))/∂gigi(t)≠∑j=1,j≠iNβj∂ugt/∂gjgj(t) is zero. This means that the condition of (22) is stronger than that in (23), and thus the condition in Conclusion 13 is only sufficient while not necessary for the incompleteness of the market.Now we study the second case. Similar to the first one, we derive a differential equation and prove that this equation leads to the incompleteness of markets.Lemma 15.
If the dividend rate vectorgi(t) has no connection with Xj(t) for all i≠j, i.e.,(32)∂git∂Xjt=0for i=1,2,…,j-1,j+1,…,N, the social planner’s utility ugt and the dividend rate vector g(t) satisfy the differential equation(33)gjt∂2ugt∂gj2+∂ugt∂gj=0and good j is not the numeraire good, then the financial market is incomplete.Proof.
From the first condition in Lemma15, we know that the risks in Xj will not appear in stock prices except for Sj. As long as we make sure that the risks in Xj do not appear in Sj, the market is incomplete.
Note that∂u(t)/∂gj(t)gj(t) is all the random part in the expectation in (20), and we have(34)d∂ut∂gjtgjt=gjtd∂ut∂gjt+∂ut∂gjtdgit+d∂ut∂gjtdgjt.We only care about gj(t) since it is the only term that may carry the risks of Xj. Using Itô’s lemma we know that the coefficient of dgj(t) in (34) is gj(t)∂2u(g)/∂gj2+∂u(g)/∂gj. If gj(t)∂2u(g)/∂gj2+∂u(g)/∂gj=0, then the financial market has no connection with Xj, which makes the market incomplete.Condition (32) is required to prevent the risk of Xj from spreading out to dividends except for gj(t). This condition seems rigorous, but it is reasonable for some industries which have less connection with others. For example, it is reasonable that, in special high-tech companies, their outputs rely heavily on the innovations of scientific researchers who occasionally have outstanding ideals, while those innovations barely influence other companies because the companies try to protect their property right or apply a patent.The next lemma gives the solution of (33).Lemma 16.
The general solution of differential equation (33) is(35)ug=Cln⁡gj+φg1,g2,…,gj-1,gj+1,…,gN,where C is a constant and φ(·) is an arbitrary real analytic function such that u(t) satisfies Assumption 4.Proof.
The proof is completed by solving the differential equation in Lemma15.Theorem 17.
If the social planner’s utility functionu(g(t)) satisfies (35), the state variable vector X(t) and the dividend rate vector g(t) satisfy (32) for i=1,2,…,j-1,j+1,…,N and the good j is not the numeraire good, then the financial market is incomplete.Proof.
The proof is completed by directly using Lemmas15 and 16.Inducing the condition in Lemma15 and the special form of the utility function in Lemma 16, the financial market eventually gets rid of the risks in Xj when equilibrium is achieved. This leads one of the column vectors of σS to be zero, and thus σS=0. Therefore, the financial market is incomplete.We give an example to illustrate Theorem17.Example 18.
Similar to Example14, we assume that there are three goods in the market, and the social planner’s utility function is(36)ug1,g2,g3=β1ln⁡g1+g2β2g3β3,where β1,β2, and β3 are constants such that Assumption 4 holds. The dividend rate is(37)git=eXit,i=1,2,3.The state variables are given by(38)dX1t=μ1X1dt+σ1X1dZ1t,(39)dX2t=μ2X2,X3dt+σ2X2,X3dZ2t,(40)dX3t=μ3X2,X3dt+σ3X2,X3dZ3t.We know that the model does not belong to the form of Conclusion 13, while it satisfies the conditions in Theorem 17 instead.
Taking good3 as the numeraire good, we get that the dividend rates in the units of good 3 are given by(41)g~1t=β1β3g2-β2tg31-β3t,g~2t=β2β3g3t,g~3t=g3t.We find that g1(t) is absent in the above equations, while it is the unique factor that carries the risk in X1(t). Hence, the diffusion matrix of dividend rates σg~ in units of good 3 must be noninvertible. Then it can be shown that the volatility matrix of stock prices σS is also noninvertible because of the loss of a risk, which certainly leads to the incompleteness of financial market.
Different from Example14, we find that the change of numeraire good makes a real difference. If we take good 1 as the numeraire good instead of good 2 or good 3, then we get(42)g~1t=g1t,g~2t=β2β1g1tg2β2tg3β3t,g~3t=β3β1g1tg2β2tg3β3t.
We find that the dividend rates in units of the numeraire good carry all the risk in state variables, and they will be transported to the stock prices. Therefore, the financial market is complete.One obvious difference between Examples14 and 18 is whether the switch of numeraire good changes the completeness of markets or not. The reason for the difference is that when we change the numeraire good, we actually change the set of available assets as well, and the definition of available assets will impact the completeness of financial markets intensely.To regularize the observation, we assume that the amount of available assets is fixed while we change the numeraire good. In order to preserve the assumption that the risk-free bond pays interests in the units of numeraire good, we convert the structure of assets to adapt this requirement. This suggests that the previous risk-free bond cannot be traded if we change the numeraire good. Under these assumptions, we define the numeraire good indifference.Definition 19 (see [7]).
The economy defined in Section2 is numeraire good indifference if an arbitrary choice of the numeraire good has no effect on the rank of the volatility matrix of stock prices σS or the completeness of the financial markets.We notice that, in the first example, no matter what good we choose as the numeraire, the market is always incomplete. Meanwhile, in the second example, the rank ofσS drops if good 2 or good 3 is the numeraire good. Therefore, the economy in Example 14 shows the attribute of numeraire good indifference, and Example 18 does not.The next proposition aims to illustrate this observation.Proposition 20.
If the utility function satisfies the condition in Conclusion13, then the financial markets exhibit the attribute of numeraire good indifference. If the utility function satisfies the condition in Theorem 17, then the financial markets do not exhibit the attribute of numeraire good indifference.Proof.
Note that the condition in Conclusion13 is irrelevant to the numeraire good, while the condition in Theorem 17 involves the choice of numeraire good. The proof is completed.Apart from Example18, Theorem 17 is able to demonstrate the example in Ehling and Larsen [7], in which they assume that the social planner’s utility function ug1t,g2t=ln⁡(g1(t))+g2t1-γ/1-γ, and other conditions in Theorem 17 are also satisfied. Applying Theorem 17, we find that the financial market of this model is incomplete without difficult calculations.To summarize, our conclusion and theorem can help those who want to build complete financial markets to avoid some incorrect settings and assumptions about utility functions and give suggestions to those who want to set up incomplete financial markets.


## 4. Complete Markets

In this section, we are going to investigate the sufficient conditions for completeness of financial markets. Before we present our results, several additional assumptions are imposed. They are similar to assumptions in Hugonnier et al. [4] and Ehling and Larsen [7].Assumption 21 (see [7]).
The unique solution to (1) admits a transition density ϕ(t,x,τ,y) that is smooth for t≠τ.Assumption 22 (see [7]).
There are locally bounded function(K,L), a metric d that is locally equivalent to the Euclidean metric, and constants ϵ,ι,ϱ>0 such that ϕ(t,x,τ,y) is analytic with respect to t≠τ in the set(43)Pϵ2≡t,τ∈C2:Rt≥0,0≤Rτ≤Tand∣S≤ϵRτ-t,and satisfies(44)ϕt,x,τ,y≤KxLyτ-t-ιeϱτ-t-dx,y2/τ-t≡ϕ¯t,x,τ,y,for all (t,τ,x,y)∈Pϵ2×X2.Assumption 23 (see [7]).
The dividend ratesgi(x), for i=1,2,…,N, are real analytic functions.Assumption 24 (see [7]).
The utility function of agentk, uk, for k=1,2,…,K, is analytic and there are constants R≤ρ and ν>1 such that(45)∫0T∑k=1Ke-Rτ∂ukgy/K⊤∂ggyϕ¯0,x,υτ,ydy)dτ<∞.In order to ensure that the stock prices in (20) are jointly real analytic in (t,x)∈(0,T)×X, it is necessary to make the above assumptions. Assumptions 21 and 22 are used in processes that involve finance and economy. For example, both vector autoregressive processes and arithmetic Brownian motions are assumed to satisfy Assumptions 21 and 22. Assumption 23 appears in literatures that involve a Lucas tree and it ensures that the processes of dividend rates are real analytic. The case is different in the payoff functions of some financial derivatives such as the European option and American option with payoff Si-K+, which are not real analytic. Assumption 24 is to guarantee that the utility functions of all the agents are real analytic and there exists an Arrow-Debreu equilibrium defined in Section 2.Definition 25 (see [4]).
Given the state price densityξ(t), the consumption allocation Ck is feasible for agent k if there exists an investment strategy (πBk,πk) that finances Ck at the initial cost of ηk⊤S(0) and ensures that the process ξ(t)Wt+∫0tξτcτdτ is a martingale with WT≥0.Based on the definition of the feasible consumption allocation, we define the Radner equilibrium, which is an extension of the Arrow-Debreu equilibrium.Definition 26 (see [10]).
A Radner equilibrium is made up of the state price densityξ, the commodity prices P, a set of price processes (B,S), consumption allocations Ckk=1K, and a set of investment strategies πBk,πkk=1K such that the following statements hold:
(a)Ck maximizes Uk over the feasible consumption allocations and is financed by (πBk,πk)
(b) All markets clearAs is shown in Dana and Jeanblanc [10], the Arrow-Debreu equilibrium can be implemented as a Radner equilibrium if the markets are dynamically complete. Riedel and Herzberg [5] use this method to prove that, in smooth Markovian continuous-time economies, if the candidate stock price function is real analytic and the volatility matrix of terminal dividends is invertible, there exist Radner equilibria with dynamic complete markets.Under the above assumptions and definitions, we give the condition of the social planner’s utility function for complete markets.Theorem 27.
Let Assumptions1–24 hold. If the social planner’s utility function u(g(t)) and the numeraire good l make the Jacobian matrix of g~(g(T,x)) invertible, i.e.,(46)∂g~∂g=∂g~1∂g1∂g~1∂g2⋯∂g~1∂gN∂g~2∂g1∂g~2∂g2⋯∂g~2∂gN⋮⋮⋱⋮∂g~N∂g1∂g~N∂g2⋯∂g~N∂gN≠0for at least one x∈X, then there exists a Radner equilibrium with dynamically complete financial market.Proof.
Applying Theorem B.2 in Anderson and Raimondo [3] and the analytic implicit function theorem in Krantz and Parks [11], we derive that the social planner’s utility function u(t) and the consumption prices ψ(t)=ξ(t)P(t) are jointly real analytic for (t,x)∈(0,T)×X. Using Proposition 2 in Hugonnier et al. [4], we know that the candidate price function S is also joint real analytic in (t,x)∈(0,T)×X. Following the work in Hugonnier et al. [4], it is shown that the volatility matrix of stock prices S is(47)σSt,x=T-tσg~T,x+oT-t=T-tIgεT,x+Ipσg+oT-t,which derives that σS(t,x) is jointly real analytic and is proportional to the volatility of the dividends in units of numeraire good when time approximates T. Then σg~=∂g~/∂g×σg≠0, while σg is not zero by our assumptions. Therefore, using Proposition 3 in [4], we conclude that a sufficient condition for the existence of the Radner equilibrium with dynamically complete financial market is ∂g~/∂g≠0 for at least one x∈X.Note that the sufficient condition for the completeness of financial markets is different from those in Hugonnier et al. [4], Ehling and Larsen [7], and Riedel and Herzberg [5]. We import the Jacobian matrix ∂g~(g)/∂g to test the completeness of markets. This matrix is not only simple to write but also easy to calculate. If ∂g~(g)/∂g≠0 at one point, then we deduce that the market is complete. Even if the social planner’s utility function is unknown in closed form, it is also easy to verify the completeness of markets by applying Theorem 27. Using numerical methods, one can solve the social planner’s utility function and check whether the market is complete or not. However, if we compute the volatilities of stock prices for all possible realization (t,x)∈[0,T]×X instead of using Theorem 27, it may be too complex and even infeasible to get the result.We know that the social planner’s utility functionu(g) is hard or even impossible to derive while Theorem 27 provides the possibility of verifying the completeness of financial markets without knowing the concrete form of u(g). Since the data of dividends and dividends in units of numeraire good are easy to obtain and available to calculate, we can approximately calculate ∂g~(g)/∂g and apply Theorem 27 to verify the completeness of financial markets.


## 5. Conclusion

In previous sections, we discuss the attributes and sufficient conditions of incomplete and complete financial markets in a continuous-time economy with multiple agents and commodities. Based on the work in Anderson and Raimondo [3] and Hugonnier et al. [4], we give sufficient conditions for the completeness of markets. Through checking whether the economy satisfies this condition or not, one can verify the completeness of the markets without difficult calculations. A sufficient condition for the incompleteness of market is investigated. In this condition, the crucial step is to check the invertibility of the Jacobian matrix of the dividends rate in the units of numeraire good for just one realization of the state variables. The conditions in this paper for incomplete and complete markets should be helpful in the domain of asset pricing.



---

*Source: 1717253-2019-04-07.xml*