# Ultradrawing and Ultimate Tenacity Properties of Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene Composite Fibers Filled with Nanosilica Particles with Varying Specific Surface Areas

Authors: Jen-taut Yeh; Chuen-Kai Wang; Lu-Kai Huang; Chih-Chen Tsai; Wei-Yu Lai
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Original and/or functionalized nanosilica particles with a quoted specific surface area of 100, 300, and 600 m2/g, respectively, were used to investigate the influence of specific surface areas of nanosilica particles on ultradrawing and ultimate tensile properties of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), UHMWPE/nanosilica, and UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica fibers. The specific surface areas of well-dispersed functionalized nanosilica particles in UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica fibers can positively affect their ultradrawing, orientation, ultimate tensile properties, and “micro-fibrils” morphologies. Excellent orientation and ultimate tensile properties of UHMWPE/nanofiller fibers can be prepared by ultradrawing the UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica as-prepared fibers with optimal contents of the best prepared functionalized nanosilica particles well dispersing in the as-prepared fibers. The ultimate tensile strength value of the best prepared UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica drawn fiber reaches 7.6 GPa, which is about 2.3 times of those of the best prepared UHMWPE drawn fiber without addition of any nanofiller. Specific surface area, morphological and Fourier transform infrared analyses of original and functionalized nanosilica particles, and/or investigations of thermal, orientation factor, and ultimate tensile properties of as-prepared and/or drawn UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica fibers were performed to understand the above improved ultradrawing and ultimate tensile properties of the UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica as-prepared and/or drawn fibers.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As a kind of extremely significant and strategic material, ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers have attracted much attention for the last three decades, since they exhibit significantly higher tenacity but lower density values than those of other high performance fibers, such as carbon and aramid fibers [1–5]. Polyethylene fibers [1, 6–31] are typical high performance fibers produced using the gel spinning processing method from flexible polymer chains. Remarkable progress has been made in the improvement of these high performance fibers since then; however, the highest tensile strengths and moduli achieved for UHMWPE fibers are still well below the broad range of theoretical tensile strengths and moduli reported for the UHMWPE perfect crystals [1]. The highest tenacity of commercially available UHMWPE fibers reaches as high as 45 g/den [32]; however, this obtained strength is still far below the theoretical achievable strength, 372 g/den reported for the perfect polyethylene crystal [16]. The key element in obtaining high-strength UHMWPE fibers is to find a way to draw the as-prepared gel specimens to an ultrahigh draw ratio after the gel spinning process. The drawability of the as-prepared gel specimens was found to depend significantly on the compositions of solutions from which gels were made [6, 7, 33]. Several authors [12–15, 33] reported that the drawing temperature and rate could markedly affect the maximal achievable draw ratio and tensile properties of solution-grown UHMWPE samples. In addition to the gel solution compositions and drawing conditions, it is generally recognized that the conditions used in the formation process after spinning and/or solution casting of gel solutions can also have a significant influence on the morphology, microstructure, and drawing properties of the specimens formed during the above-mentioned processes [7, 9, 14, 17–23].Our recent investigations [24–27] found that the achievable draw ratios (achievable λ) of UHMWPE/nanofillers as-prepared fibers prepared near the optimal UHMWPE concentration improve to a maximal value as their nanofillers contents reach an optimal value, respectively, in which, the nanofillers (e.g., carbon nanotube (CNT) [24], attapulgite [25], nanosilica and/or their functionalized nanofillers [26], and functionalized bacterial cellulose [27]) with extremely high specific surface areas can serve as efficient nucleation sites and facilitate the crystallization of UHMWPE molecules into crystals but with lower melting temperatures (Tm) and/or evaluated smaller crystal thickness (lc) values during their crystallization processes. Presumably, the crystals with lower Tm and/or evaluated smaller lc values obtained at proper plain and/or modified nanofiller contents can be melted and pulled out of folded lamellar crystals relatively easily during ultradrawing processes and hence this results in higher drawability and orientation of the UHMWPE/nanofillers or UHMWPE/modified nanofillers fibers. The maximal achievable draw ratios of UHMWPE/nanofillers or UHMWPE/modified nanofillers as-prepared fiber specimens and the tensile strengths of the drawn UHMWPE/nanofillers or UHMWPE/modified nanofillers fiber specimens are significantly higher than those of the plain UHMWPE as-prepared and drawn fiber specimens prepared at the same draw ratios of UHMWPE concentrations but without addition of the nanofillers and/or modified nanofillers, respectively. The ultimate tensile strength values of UHMWPE/purified attapulgite, UHMWPE/functionalized CNT, UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica, and UHMWPE/functionalized bacterial cellulose drawn fibers prepared using one-stage drawing process at 95°C can reach 4.7, 5.8, 7.0, and 7.1 GN m−2, respectively, which is about 1.74, 2.15, 2.59, and 2.63 times of that of the corresponding plain UHMWPE drawn fibers prepared at the same optimal UHMWPE concentration, formation, and drawing condition but without incorporation of modified nanofillers.The above results clearly suggested that nanofillers with high specific surface areas can serve as efficient nucleation sites for crystallization of UHMWPE molecules and improve the ultradrawing and ultimate tensile properties of UHMWPE/nanofiller fibers. Among these nanofillers, nanosilica particles are cheap and commercially available for a wide range of specific surface areas. In this study, the ultradrawing and ultimate tensile properties of the UHMWPE/nanosilica and UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica fibers with a wide range of specific surface areas were systematically investigated. The maximal achievableλ and ultimate tensile strength values obtained for the best prepared UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica as-prepared fibers are even higher than those of the best prepared UHMWPE/modified attapulgite, UHMWPE/functionalized CNT, and UHMPE/functionalized bacterial cellulose as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal modified attapulgite, functionalized CNT, and functionalized bacterial cellulose contents, respectively [24–27]. Specific surface area, morphological and Fourier transform infrared analyses of the original and functionalized nanosilica specimens, and/or investigations of thermal, orientation factor, and ultimate tensile properties of the as-prepared and drawn UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica fiber specimens were performed to understand the above improved ultradrawing and ultimate tensile properties of the UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica as-prepared and/or drawn fibers.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials and Sample Preparation

The UHMWPE GUR-4120 resin used in this study is associated with a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of 5.0 × 106, which was kindly supplied by Celanese (Nanjing) Diversified Chemical Corporation, Nanjing, China. Three types of nanosilica particles (Merck SSA-100, SSA-300, and SSA-600) used in this study were purchased from Lu Ming Nanomaterials Corporation, Dalian, China. The specific surface areas of SSA-100, SSA-300, and SSA-600 nanosilica (NSI) particles were quoted as 90–105 m2/g, 285–305 m2/g, and 580–610 m2/g, respectively, by Lu Ming Nanomaterials Corporation. Functionalized nanosilica (FNSI) particles were prepared by grafting maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene (PEg-MAH) molecules onto NSI particles in ultrasonicated mixtures of decalin, NSI, and PEg-MAH at 170°C for 1 hour, in which, PEg-MAH resin was purchased from Langfang Plastic Corporation, Langfang, China. The nanosilica and functionalized nanosilica particles prepared above are referred to as NSIx and FNSIxmy, respectively, in the following discussion, in which, the superscript x denotes the quoted specific surface areas of virgin NSI nanosilica particles and the subscript y denotes the weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx used in the preparation processes of FNSIxmy functionalized nanosilica particles. Table 1 summarized designations and compositions of typical nanosilica and functionalized nanosilica particles prepared in this study.Table 1
Designations, compositions, and specific surface areas of nanosilica particles (NSIx) and functionalized nanosilica particles (FNSIxmy) prepared in this study.
NS
I
x and FNSIxmy specimens
Mass ratios ofPEg-MAH to NSIx
Specific surface areas (m2/g)
NSI100
0.0
102.3
FNS
I
100
m1
1.0
109.7
FNS
I
100
m2
2.0
114.8
FNS
I
100
m3
3.0
129.8
FNS
I
100
m6
6.0
122.4
FNS
I
100
m12
12.0
109.6
NSI300
0.0
303.9
FNS
I
300
m2
2.0
314.5
FNS
I
300
m3
3.0
325.5
FNS
I
300
m6
6.0
335.8
FNS
I
300
m9
9.0
330.8
FNS
I
300
m12
12.0
315.3
NSI600
0.0
601.7
FNS
I
600
m2
2.0
617.4
FNS
I
600
m3
3.0
621.4
FNS
I
600
m6
6.0
625.3
FNS
I
600
m9
9.0
630.7
FNS
I
600
m12
12.0
621.4Varying contents ofNSIx and FNSIxmy particles together with UHMWPE resin were dispersed and dissolved in decalin at 135°C for 1.5 hours, in which 0.1% di-t-butyl-p-cresol was added as an antioxidant. The UHMWPE, UHMWPE/NSIx, and UHMWPE/FNSIxmy gel solutions prepared above were then fed into a temperature-controlled hopper and kept as hot homogenized gel solutions before spinning. The hot homogenized gel solutions were then gel-spun using a conical die with an exit diameter of 1 mm at an extrusion rate of 1000 mm/min and an extrusion temperature of 170°C. A water bath and a winder with 70 mm in diameter were placed at a distance of 520 mm and 810 mm from the spinneret exit, respectively. The extruded gel fibers were cooled in a temperature-conditioned atmosphere and then quenched into a water bath for about 1 minute, where the temperature of the air atmosphere and water bath was controlled at 5°C. The quenched fibers were then extracted in n-hexane bath for 5 minutes to remove the residual decalin solvent. The extracted fiber specimens were then dried in air for 30 minutes to remove the remaining n-hexane solvent before any drawing run. The UHMWPE, UHMWPE/NSIx, and UHMWPE/FNSIxmy as-prepared fiber specimens prepared above are referred to as F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fiber specimens, respectively, in the following discussion, in which, the superscript x denotes the quoted specific surface areas of varying NSIx particles used to prepare NSIx and FNSIxmy particles in F100NSIxz and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fiber specimens, respectively; the subscript 100 denotes one hundred parts of UHMWPE resins used in the as-prepared fibers; y denotes the weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx used in the preparation processes of FNSIxmy fillers, while the subscript z denotes parts of NSIx or FNSIxmy fillers used in per hundred parts of UHMWPE resins in the as-prepared fibers. Table 2 summarized designations of typical UHMWPE, UHMWPE/nanosilica, and UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica as-prepared fiber specimens and the corresponding compositions of gel solutions used in the gel spinning processes.Table 2
Designations, melting temperatures (Tm), percentage crystallinity (Xc), and evaluated lamellar thickness (lc) values of UHMWPE, typical UHMWPE/nanosilica, and UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica as-prepared fiber specimens and  corresponding compositions of gel solutions used in the gel spinning processes.
As-prepared fiber specimens
Original nanosilica  (g/phr)
Functionalized nanosilica (g/phr)
UHMWPE(g/phr)
Volumes of decalin in gel solutions (mL)
T
m (°C)
X
c
(%)
l
c (nm)
F100
0
—
2/100
100
142.7
65.1
30.7
F100NSI1000.05
0.001/0.05
—
2/100
100
141.1
67.8
25.6
F100NSI1000.1
0.002/0.1
—
2/100
100
140.2
70.1
17.5
F100NSI1000.125
0.0025/0.125
—
2/100
100
141.9
66.0
18.2
F100NSI3000.0375
0.00075/0.0375
—
2/100
100
140.9
68.3
22.5
F100NSI3000.0625
0.00125/0.0625
—
2/100
100
140.2
70.8
17.5
F100NSI3000.1
0.002/0.1
—
2/100
100
141.1
67.8
22.5
F100NSI6000.0375
0.00075/0.0375
—
2/100
100
140.7
69.1
19.3
F100NSI6000.05
0.001/0.05
—
2/100
100
139.9
71.5
15.7
F100NSI6000.1
0.002/0.1
—
2/100
100
140.8
67.8
22.1
F100FNSI100m2-0.0375
—
0.00075/0.0375
2/100
100
141.6
66.2
25.8
F100FNSI100m2-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
139.3
70.3
15.1
F100FNSI100m2-0.1
—
0.002/0.1
2/100
100
139.5
69.0
15.4
F100FNSI100m3-0.0375
—
0.00075/0.0375
2/100
100
140.7
69.1
17.5
F100FNSI100m3-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
138.3
75.4
12.4
F100FNSI100m3-0.1
—
0.002/0.1
2/100
100
138.9
75.1
13.5
F100FNSI100m6-0.0375
—
0.00075/0.0375
2/100
100
140.9
68.9
22.5
F100FNSI100m6-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
139.2
72.4
14.1
F100FNSI100m6-0.1
—
0.002/0.1
2/100
100
139.6
71.3
14.7
F100FNSI300m3-0.025
—
0.0005/0.025
2/100
100
139.5
73.2
14.6
F100FNSI300m3-0.05
—
0.001/0.05
2/100
100
138.6
74.0
13.1
F100FNSI300m3-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
139.3
73.4
14.2
F100FNSI300m6-0.025
—
0.0005/0.025
2/100
100
138.5
75.2
12.7
F100FNSI300m6-0.05
—
0.001/0.05
2/100
100
137.6
76.0
11.3
F100FNSI300m6-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
138.3
75.4
12.4
F100FNSI300m9-0.025
—
0.0005/0.025
2/100
100
139.0
74.1
13.6
F100FNSI300m9-0.05
—
0.001/0.05
2/100
100
138.1
75.0
12.0
F100FNSI300m9-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
138.8
73.9
13.5
F100FNSI600m3-0.025
—
0.0005/0.025
2/100
100
137.8
74.2
11.6
F100FNSI600m3-0.0375
—
0.00075/0.0375
2/100
100
137.2
74.8
10.7
F100FNSI600m3-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
138.3
73.7
12.4
F100FNSI600m9-0.025
—
0.0005/0.025
2/100
100
136.5
76.2
10.7
F100FNSI600m9-0.0375
—
0.00075/0.0375
2/100
100
136.1
76.8
9.5
F100FNSI600m9-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
137.0
75.9
10.1
F100FNSI600m12-0.025
—
0.0005/0.025
2/100
100
137.3
74.7
11.1
F100FNSI600m12-0.0375
—
0.00075/0.0375
2/100
100
136.7
75.3
9.8
F100FNSI600m12-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
137.8
74.3
11.6


### 2.2. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic measurements ofNSIx or FNSIxmy specimens with varying specific surface areas were recorded on a Nicolet Avatar 360 FTIR spectrophotometer at 25°C, wherein 32 scans with a spectral resolution 1 cm−1 were collected during each spectroscopic measurement. Infrared spectra of NSIx or FNSIxmy film specimens were determined using the conventional KBr disk method. Alcohol and decalin solutions containing NSIx or FNSIxmy particles, respectively, were cast onto KBr disk and dried at 60°C for 30 minutes. The cast films used in this study were prepared sufficiently thin enough to obey the Beer-Lambert law.


### 2.3. Morphological Analyses

In order to understand the morphology on the surfaces ofNSIx or FNSIxmy particles with varying specific surface areas prepared in Materials and Sample Preparation, NSIx particles were dispersed in alcohol, while FNSIxmy particles were dispersed in decalin to have a better dispersed morphology before examination. Before morphological analyses, ten micrograms of NSIx or FNSIxmy particles was added and ultrasonicated in 10 mL alcohol and decalin at 25°C for 5 minutes, respectively. The dispersed particles were then dried onto a carbon-coated copper grid under ambient conditions prior to morphological analyses. The cast NSIx or FNSIxmy particles were then examined using a Philip transmission electron microscope (TEM) model Tecnai G20 operated at 200 kV.


### 2.4. Specific Surface Area Analyses

A Laser Particle Size Analyzer model BT-9300H (Dandong Bettersize Instruments Corporation, Dandong, China) was used to study the specific surface areas ofNSIx or FNSIxmy particles with varying specific surface areas. Before analyses, ten micrograms of NSIx or FNSIxmy particles was added and ultrasonicated in 10 mL alcohol and decalin at 25°C for 5 minutes, respectively. The specific surface areas of NSIx or FNSIxmy particles were then measured by placing the ultrasonicated solutions prepared above in the curette of the Laser Particle Size Analyzer at 25°C.


### 2.5. Thermal and Orientation Factor Analyses

Thermal properties of all as-prepared fiber specimens were performed on a Du Pont differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) model 2000. All scans were carried out at a heating rate of 20°C/min under flowing nitrogen at a flow rate of 25 mL/min. Samples weighing 0.5 mg and 15 mg were placed in the standard aluminum sample pans for determination of their melting temperature (Tm) and percentage crystallinity (Xc) values, respectively. The percentage crystallinity values of the as-prepared fiber specimens were estimated using baselines drawn from 40 to 200°C and a perfect heat of fusion of polyethylene of 293 J/g [28].In order to understand the ultradrawing properties of UHMWPE,UHMWPE/NSIx, and UHMWPE/FNSIxmy as-prepared fiber specimens, the lamellar thickness (lc) values of the above as-prepared fibers were evaluated from their Tm values using Hoffman and Weeks’ equation [28, 29] given in (1) as follows, in which, an equilibrium melting temperature (Tmo) of 145.5°C, a perfect heat of fusion (ΔHf0) of 293 J/g, and a folded surface free energy (σe) of 9 × 10−6 J/cm2 of polyethylene crystals [28] were used for evaluation of lc values of UHMWPE, UHMWPE/NSI, and UHMWPE/FNSI as-prepared fiber specimens:(1)Tm=Tmo1-2σelcΔHf0.The orientation factor (f0) values of UHMWPE, UHMWPE/NSIx, and UHMWPE/FNSIxmy as-prepared and drawn fiber specimens were measured using a sonic velocity orientation instrument model SCY-III, which was purchased from Donghuakaili Chemicals and Fiber Technology Corporation, Shanghai, China. Before testing, the fiber specimen with 60 cm in length was wound and clamped on a testing device with a span of 40 cm. f0 values of the as-spun and drawn fiber specimens were then measured at 25°C. A minimum of five samples of each specimen were tested and averaged during f0 measurements. f0 values were evaluated using (2) as suggested by Xiao and coauthors [30]: (2)fs=1-CuC2,where C is the sonic velocity of the as-prepared or drawn UHMWPE fiber specimen and Cu is the sonic velocity of the fully unoriented sample, taken as 1.65 km/s [30].


### 2.6. Drawing and Tensile Properties of Fiber Specimens

The UHMWPE,UHMWPE/NSIx, and UHMWPE/FNSIxmy fiber specimens used in the drawing experiments were cut from the dried as-prepared fibers and then stretched on a Gotech tension testing machine model GT-TFS-2000 equipped with a temperature-controlled oven. The fibers are 150 mm in length, which were wound and clamped in a stretching device and then stretched at a crosshead speed of 20 mm/min and a constant temperature of 95°C. The draw ratio of each fiber specimen was determined as the ratio of the marked displacement after and before drawing. The marked displacement before drawing was 27 mm. The tensile properties of the as-prepared and drawn fibers were determined using a Hung Ta tension testing machine model HT-9112 at a crosshead speed of 20 mm/min. A minimum of five samples of each specimen were tested and averaged during the tensile experiments.


## 2.1. Materials and Sample Preparation

The UHMWPE GUR-4120 resin used in this study is associated with a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of 5.0 × 106, which was kindly supplied by Celanese (Nanjing) Diversified Chemical Corporation, Nanjing, China. Three types of nanosilica particles (Merck SSA-100, SSA-300, and SSA-600) used in this study were purchased from Lu Ming Nanomaterials Corporation, Dalian, China. The specific surface areas of SSA-100, SSA-300, and SSA-600 nanosilica (NSI) particles were quoted as 90–105 m2/g, 285–305 m2/g, and 580–610 m2/g, respectively, by Lu Ming Nanomaterials Corporation. Functionalized nanosilica (FNSI) particles were prepared by grafting maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene (PEg-MAH) molecules onto NSI particles in ultrasonicated mixtures of decalin, NSI, and PEg-MAH at 170°C for 1 hour, in which, PEg-MAH resin was purchased from Langfang Plastic Corporation, Langfang, China. The nanosilica and functionalized nanosilica particles prepared above are referred to as NSIx and FNSIxmy, respectively, in the following discussion, in which, the superscript x denotes the quoted specific surface areas of virgin NSI nanosilica particles and the subscript y denotes the weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx used in the preparation processes of FNSIxmy functionalized nanosilica particles. Table 1 summarized designations and compositions of typical nanosilica and functionalized nanosilica particles prepared in this study.Table 1
Designations, compositions, and specific surface areas of nanosilica particles (NSIx) and functionalized nanosilica particles (FNSIxmy) prepared in this study.
NS
I
x and FNSIxmy specimens
Mass ratios ofPEg-MAH to NSIx
Specific surface areas (m2/g)
NSI100
0.0
102.3
FNS
I
100
m1
1.0
109.7
FNS
I
100
m2
2.0
114.8
FNS
I
100
m3
3.0
129.8
FNS
I
100
m6
6.0
122.4
FNS
I
100
m12
12.0
109.6
NSI300
0.0
303.9
FNS
I
300
m2
2.0
314.5
FNS
I
300
m3
3.0
325.5
FNS
I
300
m6
6.0
335.8
FNS
I
300
m9
9.0
330.8
FNS
I
300
m12
12.0
315.3
NSI600
0.0
601.7
FNS
I
600
m2
2.0
617.4
FNS
I
600
m3
3.0
621.4
FNS
I
600
m6
6.0
625.3
FNS
I
600
m9
9.0
630.7
FNS
I
600
m12
12.0
621.4Varying contents ofNSIx and FNSIxmy particles together with UHMWPE resin were dispersed and dissolved in decalin at 135°C for 1.5 hours, in which 0.1% di-t-butyl-p-cresol was added as an antioxidant. The UHMWPE, UHMWPE/NSIx, and UHMWPE/FNSIxmy gel solutions prepared above were then fed into a temperature-controlled hopper and kept as hot homogenized gel solutions before spinning. The hot homogenized gel solutions were then gel-spun using a conical die with an exit diameter of 1 mm at an extrusion rate of 1000 mm/min and an extrusion temperature of 170°C. A water bath and a winder with 70 mm in diameter were placed at a distance of 520 mm and 810 mm from the spinneret exit, respectively. The extruded gel fibers were cooled in a temperature-conditioned atmosphere and then quenched into a water bath for about 1 minute, where the temperature of the air atmosphere and water bath was controlled at 5°C. The quenched fibers were then extracted in n-hexane bath for 5 minutes to remove the residual decalin solvent. The extracted fiber specimens were then dried in air for 30 minutes to remove the remaining n-hexane solvent before any drawing run. The UHMWPE, UHMWPE/NSIx, and UHMWPE/FNSIxmy as-prepared fiber specimens prepared above are referred to as F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fiber specimens, respectively, in the following discussion, in which, the superscript x denotes the quoted specific surface areas of varying NSIx particles used to prepare NSIx and FNSIxmy particles in F100NSIxz and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fiber specimens, respectively; the subscript 100 denotes one hundred parts of UHMWPE resins used in the as-prepared fibers; y denotes the weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx used in the preparation processes of FNSIxmy fillers, while the subscript z denotes parts of NSIx or FNSIxmy fillers used in per hundred parts of UHMWPE resins in the as-prepared fibers. Table 2 summarized designations of typical UHMWPE, UHMWPE/nanosilica, and UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica as-prepared fiber specimens and the corresponding compositions of gel solutions used in the gel spinning processes.Table 2
Designations, melting temperatures (Tm), percentage crystallinity (Xc), and evaluated lamellar thickness (lc) values of UHMWPE, typical UHMWPE/nanosilica, and UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica as-prepared fiber specimens and  corresponding compositions of gel solutions used in the gel spinning processes.
As-prepared fiber specimens
Original nanosilica  (g/phr)
Functionalized nanosilica (g/phr)
UHMWPE(g/phr)
Volumes of decalin in gel solutions (mL)
T
m (°C)
X
c
(%)
l
c (nm)
F100
0
—
2/100
100
142.7
65.1
30.7
F100NSI1000.05
0.001/0.05
—
2/100
100
141.1
67.8
25.6
F100NSI1000.1
0.002/0.1
—
2/100
100
140.2
70.1
17.5
F100NSI1000.125
0.0025/0.125
—
2/100
100
141.9
66.0
18.2
F100NSI3000.0375
0.00075/0.0375
—
2/100
100
140.9
68.3
22.5
F100NSI3000.0625
0.00125/0.0625
—
2/100
100
140.2
70.8
17.5
F100NSI3000.1
0.002/0.1
—
2/100
100
141.1
67.8
22.5
F100NSI6000.0375
0.00075/0.0375
—
2/100
100
140.7
69.1
19.3
F100NSI6000.05
0.001/0.05
—
2/100
100
139.9
71.5
15.7
F100NSI6000.1
0.002/0.1
—
2/100
100
140.8
67.8
22.1
F100FNSI100m2-0.0375
—
0.00075/0.0375
2/100
100
141.6
66.2
25.8
F100FNSI100m2-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
139.3
70.3
15.1
F100FNSI100m2-0.1
—
0.002/0.1
2/100
100
139.5
69.0
15.4
F100FNSI100m3-0.0375
—
0.00075/0.0375
2/100
100
140.7
69.1
17.5
F100FNSI100m3-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
138.3
75.4
12.4
F100FNSI100m3-0.1
—
0.002/0.1
2/100
100
138.9
75.1
13.5
F100FNSI100m6-0.0375
—
0.00075/0.0375
2/100
100
140.9
68.9
22.5
F100FNSI100m6-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
139.2
72.4
14.1
F100FNSI100m6-0.1
—
0.002/0.1
2/100
100
139.6
71.3
14.7
F100FNSI300m3-0.025
—
0.0005/0.025
2/100
100
139.5
73.2
14.6
F100FNSI300m3-0.05
—
0.001/0.05
2/100
100
138.6
74.0
13.1
F100FNSI300m3-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
139.3
73.4
14.2
F100FNSI300m6-0.025
—
0.0005/0.025
2/100
100
138.5
75.2
12.7
F100FNSI300m6-0.05
—
0.001/0.05
2/100
100
137.6
76.0
11.3
F100FNSI300m6-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
138.3
75.4
12.4
F100FNSI300m9-0.025
—
0.0005/0.025
2/100
100
139.0
74.1
13.6
F100FNSI300m9-0.05
—
0.001/0.05
2/100
100
138.1
75.0
12.0
F100FNSI300m9-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
138.8
73.9
13.5
F100FNSI600m3-0.025
—
0.0005/0.025
2/100
100
137.8
74.2
11.6
F100FNSI600m3-0.0375
—
0.00075/0.0375
2/100
100
137.2
74.8
10.7
F100FNSI600m3-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
138.3
73.7
12.4
F100FNSI600m9-0.025
—
0.0005/0.025
2/100
100
136.5
76.2
10.7
F100FNSI600m9-0.0375
—
0.00075/0.0375
2/100
100
136.1
76.8
9.5
F100FNSI600m9-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
137.0
75.9
10.1
F100FNSI600m12-0.025
—
0.0005/0.025
2/100
100
137.3
74.7
11.1
F100FNSI600m12-0.0375
—
0.00075/0.0375
2/100
100
136.7
75.3
9.8
F100FNSI600m12-0.075
—
0.0015/0.075
2/100
100
137.8
74.3
11.6


## 2.2. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic measurements ofNSIx or FNSIxmy specimens with varying specific surface areas were recorded on a Nicolet Avatar 360 FTIR spectrophotometer at 25°C, wherein 32 scans with a spectral resolution 1 cm−1 were collected during each spectroscopic measurement. Infrared spectra of NSIx or FNSIxmy film specimens were determined using the conventional KBr disk method. Alcohol and decalin solutions containing NSIx or FNSIxmy particles, respectively, were cast onto KBr disk and dried at 60°C for 30 minutes. The cast films used in this study were prepared sufficiently thin enough to obey the Beer-Lambert law.


## 2.3. Morphological Analyses

In order to understand the morphology on the surfaces ofNSIx or FNSIxmy particles with varying specific surface areas prepared in Materials and Sample Preparation, NSIx particles were dispersed in alcohol, while FNSIxmy particles were dispersed in decalin to have a better dispersed morphology before examination. Before morphological analyses, ten micrograms of NSIx or FNSIxmy particles was added and ultrasonicated in 10 mL alcohol and decalin at 25°C for 5 minutes, respectively. The dispersed particles were then dried onto a carbon-coated copper grid under ambient conditions prior to morphological analyses. The cast NSIx or FNSIxmy particles were then examined using a Philip transmission electron microscope (TEM) model Tecnai G20 operated at 200 kV.


## 2.4. Specific Surface Area Analyses

A Laser Particle Size Analyzer model BT-9300H (Dandong Bettersize Instruments Corporation, Dandong, China) was used to study the specific surface areas ofNSIx or FNSIxmy particles with varying specific surface areas. Before analyses, ten micrograms of NSIx or FNSIxmy particles was added and ultrasonicated in 10 mL alcohol and decalin at 25°C for 5 minutes, respectively. The specific surface areas of NSIx or FNSIxmy particles were then measured by placing the ultrasonicated solutions prepared above in the curette of the Laser Particle Size Analyzer at 25°C.


## 2.5. Thermal and Orientation Factor Analyses

Thermal properties of all as-prepared fiber specimens were performed on a Du Pont differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) model 2000. All scans were carried out at a heating rate of 20°C/min under flowing nitrogen at a flow rate of 25 mL/min. Samples weighing 0.5 mg and 15 mg were placed in the standard aluminum sample pans for determination of their melting temperature (Tm) and percentage crystallinity (Xc) values, respectively. The percentage crystallinity values of the as-prepared fiber specimens were estimated using baselines drawn from 40 to 200°C and a perfect heat of fusion of polyethylene of 293 J/g [28].In order to understand the ultradrawing properties of UHMWPE,UHMWPE/NSIx, and UHMWPE/FNSIxmy as-prepared fiber specimens, the lamellar thickness (lc) values of the above as-prepared fibers were evaluated from their Tm values using Hoffman and Weeks’ equation [28, 29] given in (1) as follows, in which, an equilibrium melting temperature (Tmo) of 145.5°C, a perfect heat of fusion (ΔHf0) of 293 J/g, and a folded surface free energy (σe) of 9 × 10−6 J/cm2 of polyethylene crystals [28] were used for evaluation of lc values of UHMWPE, UHMWPE/NSI, and UHMWPE/FNSI as-prepared fiber specimens:(1)Tm=Tmo1-2σelcΔHf0.The orientation factor (f0) values of UHMWPE, UHMWPE/NSIx, and UHMWPE/FNSIxmy as-prepared and drawn fiber specimens were measured using a sonic velocity orientation instrument model SCY-III, which was purchased from Donghuakaili Chemicals and Fiber Technology Corporation, Shanghai, China. Before testing, the fiber specimen with 60 cm in length was wound and clamped on a testing device with a span of 40 cm. f0 values of the as-spun and drawn fiber specimens were then measured at 25°C. A minimum of five samples of each specimen were tested and averaged during f0 measurements. f0 values were evaluated using (2) as suggested by Xiao and coauthors [30]: (2)fs=1-CuC2,where C is the sonic velocity of the as-prepared or drawn UHMWPE fiber specimen and Cu is the sonic velocity of the fully unoriented sample, taken as 1.65 km/s [30].


## 2.6. Drawing and Tensile Properties of Fiber Specimens

The UHMWPE,UHMWPE/NSIx, and UHMWPE/FNSIxmy fiber specimens used in the drawing experiments were cut from the dried as-prepared fibers and then stretched on a Gotech tension testing machine model GT-TFS-2000 equipped with a temperature-controlled oven. The fibers are 150 mm in length, which were wound and clamped in a stretching device and then stretched at a crosshead speed of 20 mm/min and a constant temperature of 95°C. The draw ratio of each fiber specimen was determined as the ratio of the marked displacement after and before drawing. The marked displacement before drawing was 27 mm. The tensile properties of the as-prepared and drawn fibers were determined using a Hung Ta tension testing machine model HT-9112 at a crosshead speed of 20 mm/min. A minimum of five samples of each specimen were tested and averaged during the tensile experiments.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Figure1 illustrates typical Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of nanosilica (NSIx), functionalized nanosilica (FNSIxmy), and maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene (PEg-MAH) specimens. PEg-MAH specimen exhibited two distinctive absorption bands centered at 1711 and 1791 cm−1, which were generally attributed to the motion of O-C=O and C=O stretching vibrations of maleic anhydride [31] (see Figure 1(a)). As shown in Figures 1(b), 1(f), and 1(j), there are three distinguished absorption bands centered at 1097, 1635, and 3442 cm−1 corresponding to the motions of Si-O-Si stretching, H-O-H bending, and Si-OH stretching vibrations [31], respectively, which were found in the spectra of NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 specimens. It is interesting to note that the peak magnitudes of Si-O-Si stretching, H-O-H bending, and Si-OH stretching bands of NSIx specimens increased significantly as their quoted specific surface areas increased from 100 to 300 and 600 m2/g (see Figures 1(b), 1(f), and 1(j)). The significant increase in the magnitude of Si-O-Si stretching, H-O-H bending, and Si-OH stretching bands of NSIx specimens is attributed to the increased amounts of Si-O-Si, H-O-H, and Si-OH groups exposed on NSIx particles with higher specific surface areas.Figure 1
FTIR spectra of (a)PEg-MAH, (b) NSI600, (c) FNSI600m3, (d) FNSI600m9, (e) FNSI600m12, (f) NSI300, (g) FNSI300m3, (h) FNSI300m6, (i) FNSI300m9, (j) NSI100, (k) FNSI100m2, (l) FNSI100m3, and (m) FNSI100m6 specimens (the superscript x denotes the quoted specific surface areas of virgin NSIx nanosilica particles; y denotes the weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx used in the preparation processes of FNSIxmy functionalized nanosilica particles).After graftingPEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles, the peak magnitudes corresponding to H-O-H bending and Si-OH stretching bands of FNSIxmy specimens reduced significantly as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSIx increased (see Figures 1(b) to 1(e), 1(f) to 1(i), and 1(j) to 1(m)). In fact, as shown in Figures 1(d) to 1(e), 1(h) to 1(i), and 1(l) to 1(m), H-O-H bending and Si-OH stretching bands originally present in NSIx specimens disappeared almost completely as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my specimens were equal to or more than 3, 6, and 9, respectively. In the meantime, a new absorption band centered at around 1228 cm−1 corresponding to the motion of ester C-O stretching vibration [31] was found in the spectra of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my specimens (see Figures 1(c) to 1(e), 1(g) to 1(i), and 1(k) to 1(m)). In contrast, the absorption bands centered at 1711 and 1791 cm−1 corresponding to the motion of C=O and O-C=O stretching vibrations of maleic anhydride gradually reappeared as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my specimens, respectively, were equal to 6, 9, and 12. Presumably, the gradually disappearing H-O-H bending and Si-OH stretching bands and newly developed ester C-O stretching bands of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my specimens are attributed to the reaction of the hydroxyl groups of NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles with the maleic anhydride groups of PEg-MAH molecules during their functionalized processes. The reappearance of O-C=O and C=O stretching bands of maleic anhydride groups is most likely due to the overdosage of PEg-MAH during the functionalized processes of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my particles.


### 3.2. Morphological Analyses ofNSIx and FNSIxmy Particles

Figure2 exhibits typical TEM micrographs of NSIx and FNSIxmy particles. Typical irregular particle feature with dimensions of 250–350, 150–200, and 50–80 nm in diameter was observed for NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles (see Figures 2(a), 2(d), and 2(g)). After modification by PEg-MAH, some translucent resins were found attaching on the surfaces of NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles, wherein the amounts of attached translucent resins increased gradually as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 increased, respectively (see Figures 2(b) to 2(c), 2(e) to 2(g), and 2(h) to 2(i)). As evidenced by FTIR analyses in the previous section, the attached translucent resins were most likely the grafted PEg-MAH molecules, which were firmly bonded to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles by the reaction of the maleic anhydride groups of PEg-MAH resins with the hydroxyl groups of NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles, respectively. In fact, the translucent resins were found fully surrounding and overwrapping on NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles, as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 were greater than 3, 6, and 12, respectively (see Figures 2(c), 2(f), and 2(i)).Figure 2
TEM micrographs of (a) NSI100, (b) FNSI100m3, (c) FNSI100m6, (d) NSI300, (e) FNSI300m6, (f) FNSI300m9, (g) NSI600, (h) FNSI600m9, and (i) FNSI600m12 specimens.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)


### 3.3. Specific Surface Area Analyses ofNSIx and FNSIxmy Particles

The values of specific surface areas ofNSIx and FNSIxmy particles are summarized in Figure 3 and Table 1. The specific surface areas of NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles were evaluated at around 100, 300, and 600 m2/g (i.e., 102.3, 303.9, and 601.7 m2/g), respectively. After modification by PEg-MAH, the specific surface areas of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my particles reached a maximal value at 129.8, 335.8, and 630.7 m2/g, respectively, as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 approached an optimal value at 3, 6, and 9, respectively. Presumably, the beneficial effect of PEg-MAH contents on specific surface areas of FNSIxmy particles is attributed to the increase in grafted amounts and specific surface areas of PEg-MAH on NSIx particles during their functionalized processes. However, PEg-MAH molecules may agglomerate, bundle, entangle together, and overwrap NSIx particles, as PEg-MAH molecules are superfluous and can no longer graft onto NSIx particles. As evidenced by morphology analyses in the previous section, some translucent resins were found fully surrounding and overwrapping on NSIx particles (see Figures 2(c), 2(g), and 2(i)), as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 were more than 3, 6, and 9, respectively. Based on this premise, it is reasonable to infer that the overwrapped FNSIxmy particles exhibit relatively lower specific surface areas than those FNSI100m3, FNSI300m6, and FNSI600m9 particles grafted with proper amounts of PEg-MAH resins.Figure 3
Specific surface areas of carbon nanofiber (∙), NSI100 (◆), NSI300 (■), NSI600 (▲), FNSI100my (◊), FNSI300my (□), FNSI600my (△), and modified carbon nanofiber (∘) specimens.


### 3.4. Thermal Properties of the As-Prepared Fibers

Typical DSC thermograms, melting temperature (Tm), percentage crystallinity (Xc), and evaluated lamellar thickness (lc) values of UHMWPE (F100), UHMWPE/NSI (F100NSIxz), and UHMWPE/FNSI (F100FNSIxmy-z) as-prepared fiber series specimens are summarized in Figure 4 and Table 2. A main melting endotherm with Tm and Xc at 142.7°C and 65.1%, respectively, was found for F100 specimen. After incorporation of NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles in UHMWPE, Tm (or evaluated lc) values of F100NSIxz (i.e., F100NSI100z, F100NSI300z, and F100NSI600z) and/or F100FNSIxmy-z (i.e., F100FNSI100my-z, F100FNSI300my-z, and F100FNSI600my-z) as-prepared fibers reduced to a minimal value, as their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents reached an optimal value, respectively, in which Tm and lc values of F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents at 0.075, 0.05, and 0.0375 phr, respectively, were significantly lower than those of the corresponding F100NSI1000.1, F100NSI3000.0625, and F100NSI6000.05 as-prepared fibers with an optimal NSIx content at 0.1, 0.0625, and 0.05 phr, respectively. However, Xc values of F100NSIxz and/or F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers increased to a maximal value, as NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents reached their corresponding optimal values, respectively, wherein Xc values of F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at their optimal FNSIxmy contents, respectively, were significantly higher than those of the corresponding F100NSI1000.1, F100NSI3000.0625, and F100NSI6000.05 as-prepared fibers prepared at their optimal NSIx contents, respectively. Moreover, it is worth noting that F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents exhibited another minimal Tm (or evaluated lc) but other maximal Xc values as their FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my were modified using an optimal weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 at 3, 6, and 9, respectively (see Figures 5(j), 6(i), and 7(h)). Finally, it is interesting to note that the lowest Tm (or evaluated lc) values obtained for F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx reduced significantly as the specific surface areas of FNSIxmy particles increased, while the highest Xc values obtained for F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers increased consistently as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased. For instance, Tm values of F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers reduced from 138.3°C to 137.6°C and to 136.1°C, as the specific surface areas of FNSI100m3, FNSI300m6, and FNSI600m9 present in F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers increased from 129.8 to 335.8 and 630.7 m2/g, respectively, while their Xc values increased from 75.4% to 76.0% and 76.8%, as the specific surface areas of FNSI100m3, FNSI300m6, and FNSI600m9 present in F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers increased from 129.8 to 335.8 and 630.7 m2/g, respectively.Figure 4
DSC thermograms of (a) F100, (b) F100FNSI600m3-0.025, (c) F100FNSI600m3-0.0375, (d) F100FNSI600m3-0.05, (e) F100FNSI600m3-0.625, (f) F100FNSI600m3-0.075, (g) F100FNSI600m9-0.025, (h) F100FNSI600m9-0.0375, (i) F100FNSI600m9-0.05, (j) F100FNSI600m9-0.625, (k) F100FNSI600m9-0.075, (l) F100FNSI600m12-0.025, (m) F100FNSI600m12-0.0375, (n) F100FNSI600m12-0.05, (o) F100FNSI600m12-0.0625, and (p) F100FNSI600m12-0.075 as-prepared fibers.Figure 5
Achievable draw ratios as-prepared fibers.Figure 6
The orientation factor (f0) values as-prepared and drawn fibers with varying draw ratios.Figure 7
SEM micrographs of F100 fibers with a draw ratio of (a) 1, (b) 50, and (c) 100; F100FNSI100m3-0.075 fibers with a draw ratio of (d) 1, (e) 50, and (f) 100; F100FNSI300m6-0.05 fibers with a draw ratio of (g) 1, (h) 50, and (i) 100; and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 fibers with a draw ratio of (j) 1, (k) 50, and (l) 100.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)As evidenced by specific surface area and TEM analyses in the previous sections,NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles are with a wide range of relatively large surface areas per volume, which make them in close proximity to a large fraction of the UHMWPE matrix. Apparently, even very small contents of dispersed NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles can serve as efficient nucleation sites for UHMWPE molecules during their gel spinning processes. These efficient nucleation sites of NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles then facilitate the crystallization of UHMWPE molecules into crystals with thinner lamellar thickness and/or lower Tm values during their crystallization processes. After grafting PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles, the properly modified FNSIxmy particles with even higher specific surface areas are likely to disperse better in UHMWPE and serve as more effective sites for nucleation of UHMWPE molecules during their gel spinning processes than NSIx particles. As a consequence, F100FNSI100my-z, F100FNSI300my-z, and F100FNSI600my-z as-prepared fiber specimens exhibit significantly higher Xc but lower Tm (or evaluated lc) values than the corresponding F100NSI100z, F100NSI300z, and F100NSI600z as-prepared fiber specimens prepared with the same NSIx contents but without modification by PEg-MAH, respectively. Moreover, the minimal Tm (or evaluated lc) values obtained for F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx, respectively, reduced significantly as the specific surface areas of FNSIxmy particles increased, while the highest Xc values obtained for F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers increased consistently as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased.


### 3.5. Achievable Draw Ratios of the As-Prepared Fibers

Figure5 summarized the achievable draw ratio (achievable λ) values of F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fiber specimens prepared at varying NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents, respectively. For comparison purposes, achievable λ values of the best prepared UHMWPE/functionalized carbon nanotube (FCNT) as-prepared fibers (i.e., F100Cf2-0.1 specimens) obtained in our previous investigations [24] were also summarized in Figure 5, in which, functionalized carbon nanotubes are with relatively high (i.e., 272.7 m2/g) but significantly lower specific surface areas than those of FNSI300my and FNSI600my particles prepared in this study. After addition with NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles in UHMWPE, the achievable λ values of F100NSIxz and/or F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers increased initially and reached a maximal value as their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents approached an optimal value, respectively, in which the achievable λ values of F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents at 0.075, 0.05, and 0.0375 phr, respectively, were significantly higher than those of the corresponding F100NSI1000.1, F100NSI3000.0625, and F100NSI6000.05 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal NSIx contents at 0.1, 0.0625, and 0.05 phr, respectively. Moreover, it is worth noting that F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents exhibited other maximal achievable λ values at 176, 289, and 361, respectively, as their FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my particles were modified using an optimal weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 at 3, 6, and 9, respectively. It is further interesting to note that the highest achievable λ values obtained for the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSIx improved significantly as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased. In fact, the maximal achievable λ value (i.e., 361) obtained for F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fiber is about 2.05 and 1.25 times of those of F100FNSI100m3-0.075 and the best prepared UHMWPE/FCNT as-prepared fibers and is 2.85 times of that of F100 as-prepared fiber without addition of original and/or modified nanosilica particles.


### 3.6. Orientation Factor Analyses of the As-Prepared and Drawn Fiber Specimens

Typical orientation factor (f0) values of F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared and drawn fibers are summarized in Figure 6. No significant difference in f0 values was found for F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers. As expected, f0 values of F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z fibers increased consistently as their draw ratios increased. After addition of NSIxz and/or FNSIxmy-z particles, f0 values of drawn F100NSIxz and/or F100FNSIxmy-z fibers were significantly higher than those of drawn F100 fibers with the same draw ratios. f0 values of drawn F100NSIxz fibers with a fixed draw ratio reached a maximal value as their NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 contents approached the optimal values at 0.1, 0.0625, and 0.05 phr, respectively. Similarly, f0 values of each drawn F100FNSIxmy-z fiber series specimen reached a maximal value as their FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my contents approached an optimal value at 0.075, 0.05, and 0.0375 phr, respectively, in which, f0 values of drawn F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents were significantly higher than those of the corresponding drawn F100NSI1000.1, F100NSI3000.0625, and F100NSI6000.05 fibers prepared with the same draw ratios and at an optimal NSIx content, respectively. Moreover, it is worth noting that F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 drawn fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents exhibited other maximal f0 values as their FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my particles were modified using an optimal weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 at 3, 6, and 9, respectively. It is further interesting to note that the maximal f0 values obtained for the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSIx improved significantly as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased.As evidenced by thermal and lamellar thickness analyses,Tm (or evaluated lc) values of F100NSIxz and/or F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers reduced to a minimal value, as their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents reached an optimal value, respectively. Moreover, the lowest Tm (or evaluated lc) values obtained for the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx reduced significantly as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased. Presumably, these crystals with lower Tm and/or evaluated lc values can be melted and pulled out of folded lamellar crystals relatively easily during the ultradrawing processes, and hence this results in higher drawability and orientation of the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 fibers, in which, the drawability and orientation of the best prepared fibers improved significantly as the specific surface areas of FNSI100m3, FNSI300m6, and FNSI600m9 present in F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared and/or drawn fibers increased. However, the amounts of coagulated NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles are likely to increase significantly when their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents are higher than certain values, respectively. These coagulated NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles can slide against each other and serve as the defects for stress concentration during the drawing processes of F100NSIxz and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers and hence lead to an early breakage and/or significant reduction in achievable λ and f0 values of the resulting drawn fibers. Based on these premises, it is reasonable to understand that the achievable λ values of F100NSIxz and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers and f0 values of the drawn F100NSIxz and F100FNSIxmy-z fibers with a fixed draw ratio reduce significantly when their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents are higher than the specific optimal value, respectively.


### 3.7. Morphological Analyses of the As-Prepared and Drawn Fibers

Figure7 exhibits typical SEM micrographs of the as-prepared and drawn F100, F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 fibers with various draw ratios. Many demarcated drawn “micro-fibrils” were found paralleling the drawing direction of the drawn F100, F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 fibers as their draw ratios increased, wherein the thicknesses of these drawn micro-fibrils reduced significantly as the draw ratios increased. Moreover, more and thinner “micro-fibrils” were found on the surfaces of F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared and/or drawn fibers with the same draw ratio as the specific surface areas of their FNSI100m3, FNSI300m6, and FNSI600m9 particles increased.It is not completely clear what accounts for the interesting demarcated “micro-fibril” morphology found on the surfaces of F100, F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared and drawn fibers. Presumably, during the ultradrawing processes, many of the UHMWPE kebab crystals with relatively thinner lamellar thickness values can be unfolded and pulled out of the crystal lamellae in an easier way than those kebab crystals with thicker lamellar thickness values. The unfolded UHMWPE molecules pulled out from the kebab lamellae can then gradually transform into the oriented “micro-fibrils” during their ultradrawing processes. As evidenced by DSC analyses in the previous section, Tm (or evaluated lc) values of F100NSIxz and/or F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers were significantly lower than that of F100 as-prepared fiber and reached a minimal value, as their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents approached an optimal value, respectively, in which, the lowest Tm (or evaluated lc) values obtained for the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx reduced significantly as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased. Based on these premises, it is reasonable to infer that the “micro-fibrils” found on the surfaces of as-prepared and/or drawn F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 fibers are more and thinner than those of the corresponding as-prepared and/or drawn F100 fibers with the same draw ratios but without addition of any “nuclear” nanofillers. By the same analogy, more and thinner “micro-fibrils” are expected to be found on the surfaces of F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared and/or drawn fibers as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased.


### 3.8. Tensile Properties

Tensile strength (σf) and modulus (E) values of F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers prepared at varying draw ratios are illustrated in Table 3. For comparison purposes, σf and E values of the best prepared UHMWPE/FCNT (i.e., F100Cf2-0.1) as-prepared fiber obtained in our previous investigation [24] were also summarized in Table 3. As expected, σf and E values of the drawn F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z fibers improve consistently as their draw ratios increase. It is worth noting that σf and E values of drawn F100NSIxz and F100FNSIxmy-z fibers are significantly higher than those of the corresponding drawn F100 fibers with the same draw ratio but without addition of NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles. Similar to those found for their f0 values, σf and E values of drawn F100NSIxz and F100FNSIxmy-z fibers reach a maximal value as their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents approach the optimal values at 0.075, 0.05, and 0.0375 phr, respectively, in which σf and E values of drawn F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 fibers prepared at their optimal FNSIxmy contents are significantly higher than those of the corresponding drawn F100NSI1000.1, F100NSI3000.0625, and F100NSI6000.05 fibers with the same draw ratio and an optimal NSIx content at 0.1, 0.0625, and 0.05 phr, respectively. Moreover, at a fixed draw ratio, drawn F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents exhibited other maximal σf and E values, as their FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my particles were modified using an optimal weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 at 3, 6, and 9, respectively. It is interesting to note that the maximal σf and E values obtained for the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 drawn fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx increased significantly as the specific surface areas of FNSIxmy particles increased. For instance, the ultimate σf values of best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100Cf2-0.1, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 fibers reached 4.4, 5.1, 7.1, and 7.6 GPa, respectively, as the specific surface areas of FNSI100m3, FCNT, FNSI300my6, and FNSI600m9 particles increased from 129.8 to 272.7, 335.8 and to 630.7 m2/g, respectively. The ultimate σf value of the best prepared F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 drawn fiber is about 1.7 and 1.5 times of those of the F100FNSI100m3-0.075 and the best prepared UHMWPE/FCNT drawn fiber specimens, respectively, and is about 2.3 times of that of the best prepared UHMWPE drawn fibers prepared at the same optimal UHMWPE concentration and drawing condition but without addition of any nanofiller.Table 3
Tensile strength (σf) and modulus values (E) of UHMWPE (F100), UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica (F100FNSIxmy-z), and UHMWPE/carbon nanotube (F100Cf2-0.1) fiber specimens with varying draw ratios.
Draw ratio
Specimen
F100
F100Cf2-0.1
F100FNSI100m2-0.625
F100FNSI100m2-0.075
F100FNSI100m2-0.1
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
20
1.6
58.0
2.7
106.3
2.1
61.1
2.2
69.0
2.1
59.0
40
1.9
71.2
3.5
140.5
2.6
80.7
2.8
90.3
2.8
77.8
60
2.6
92.9
4.2
169.8
3.4
105.2
3.6
119.0
3.5
101.4
120
3.4
112.5
4.9
194.5
4.0
118.5
4.2
130.2
4.0
115.9
160
—
—
5.1
204.6
4.4
163.3
4.8
184.3
4.5
152.3
Draw ratio
Specimen
F100FNSI100m3-0.625
F100FNSI100m3-0.075
F100FNSI100m3-0.1
F100FNSI100m6-0.625
F100FNSI100m6-0.075
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
20
2.4
73.1
2.5
81.0
2.4
71.0
2.2
67.1
2.3
75.0
40
2.9
92.7
3.1
102.3
3.1
89.8
2.7
86.7
2.9
96.3
60
3.7
117.2
3.9
131.0
3.8
113.4
3.5
111.2
3.7
125.0
120
4.3
130.5
4.5
142.2
4.3
127.9
4.1
124.5
4.3
136.2
160
4.6
175.3
5.0
196.3
4.8
164.3
4.4
169.3
4.8
190.3
Draw ratio
Specimen
F100FNSI100m6-0.1
F100FNSI300m3-0.375
F100FNSI300m3-0.5
F100FNSI300m3-0.075
F100FNSI300m6-0.375
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
20
2.2
65.0
2.5
79.3
2.6
84.2
2.3
75.9
2.9
93.3
40
2.9
83.8
3.2
108.3
3.3
112.9
2.8
102.9
3.6
122.3
60
3.6
107.4
4.1
151.7
4.2
156.7
3.9
147.0
4.5
165.7
120
4.1
121.9
4.7
172.7
4.9
176.9
4.4
167.6
5.1
186.7
160
4.6
158.3
5.7
184.9
5.8
187.9
5.5
183.9
6.1
198.9
200
—
—
6.0
188.1
6.1
192.6
5.9
189.2
6.4
202.1
Draw ratio
Specimen
F100FNSI300m6-0.5
F100FNSI300m6-0.075
F100FNSI300m9-0.375
F100FNSI300m9-0.5
F100FNSI300m9-0.075
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
20
3.0
98.2
2.7
89.9
2.6
86.3
2.7
91.2
2.4
82.9
40
3.7
126.9
3.2
116.9
3.3
115.3
3.4
119.9
2.9
109.9
60
4.6
170.7
4.3
161.0
4.2
158.7
4.3
163.7
4.0
154.0
120
5.3
190.9
4.8
181.6
4.8
179.7
5.0
183.9
4.5
174.6
160
6.2
201.9
5.9
197.9
5.8
191.9
5.9
194.9
5.6
190.9
200
6.5
206.6
6.3
203.2
6.1
195.1
6.2
199.6
6.0
196.2
Draw ratio
Specimen
F100FNSI600m6-0.025
F100FNSI600m6-0.0375
F100FNSI600m6-0.05
F100FNSI600m9-0.025
F100FNSI600m9-0.0375
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
20
2.5
93.5
2.8
101.2
2.6
96.5
2.9
109.5
3.2
117.2
40
3.2
116.7
3.5
128.1
3.3
126.1
3.6
132.7
3.9
144.1
60
4.3
156.8
4.4
163.4
4.3
158.8
4.7
172.8
4.8
179.4
120
4.9
181.5
5.2
190.8
5.0
184.1
5.3
197.5
5.6
206.8
160
6.0
221.2
6.2
227.4
6.1
223.9
6.4
237.2
6.6
243.4
200
6.2
230.5
6.4
236.4
6.4
234.8
6.6
246.5
6.8
252.4
240
6.5
239.7
6.6
245.7
6.5
241.4
6.9
255.7
7.0
261.7
280
6.6
244.9
6.8
247.2
6.6
245.0
7.0
260.9
7.1
263.2
320
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7.2
266.0
360
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7.4
273.7
Draw ratio
Specimen
F100FNSI600m9-0.05
F100FNSI600m12-0.025
F100FNSI600m12-0.0375
F100FNSI600m12-0.05
—
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
—
20
3.0
112.5
2.4
100.5
3.0
108.2
2.8
103.5
—
40
3.8
142.1
3.4
123.7
3.7
135.1
3.6
133.1
—
60
4.7
174.8
4.5
163.8
4.6
170.4
4.5
165.8
—
120
5.4
200.1
5.1
188.5
5.4
197.8
5.2
191.1
—
160
6.5
239.9
6.2
228.2
6.4
234.4
6.3
230.9
—
200
6.8
250.8
6.4
237.5
6.6
243.4
6.6
241.8
—
240
6.9
257.4
6.7
246.7
6.8
252.7
6.7
248.4
—
280
7.0
261.0
6.8
251.9
6.9
254.2
6.8
252.0
—
320
—
—
—
—
7.0
257.0
—
—
—The mechanical properties of the drawn specimens are generally believed to depend mainly on the degree of orientation of the drawn specimens, as their molecular weights are constant [16, 34]. As evidenced by orientation analyses in the previous section, at a fixed draw ratio, f0 values of drawn F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents were significantly higher than those of the corresponding F100NSI1000.1, F100NSI3000.0625, and F100NSI6000.05 fibers prepared at an optimal NSIx content, respectively. Moreover, f0 values of F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 drawn fibers were always higher than those of other F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 fibers prepared with the same draw ratios and FNSI contents but modified using an optimal weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 other than 3, 6, and 9, respectively. In fact, the maximal f0 values obtained for the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 drawn fibers improved significantly as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased. These results clearly suggest that a good orientation of UHMWPE molecules along the drawing direction positively affects the tensile properties of F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z fibers. Excellent orientation and ultimate tensile properties of UHMWPE/nanofiller fibers can be prepared by the ultradrawing of F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers with optimal contents of the best prepared FNSI100m3, FNSI300m6, and FNSI600m9 particles well dispersing in their as-prepared fibers. Moreover, the specific surface areas of well-dispersed functionalized nanofillers in UHMWPE/functionalized nanofiller fibers can positively affect their ultradrawing, orientation, ultimate tensile properties, and “micro-fibrils” morphologies.


## 3.1. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Figure1 illustrates typical Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of nanosilica (NSIx), functionalized nanosilica (FNSIxmy), and maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene (PEg-MAH) specimens. PEg-MAH specimen exhibited two distinctive absorption bands centered at 1711 and 1791 cm−1, which were generally attributed to the motion of O-C=O and C=O stretching vibrations of maleic anhydride [31] (see Figure 1(a)). As shown in Figures 1(b), 1(f), and 1(j), there are three distinguished absorption bands centered at 1097, 1635, and 3442 cm−1 corresponding to the motions of Si-O-Si stretching, H-O-H bending, and Si-OH stretching vibrations [31], respectively, which were found in the spectra of NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 specimens. It is interesting to note that the peak magnitudes of Si-O-Si stretching, H-O-H bending, and Si-OH stretching bands of NSIx specimens increased significantly as their quoted specific surface areas increased from 100 to 300 and 600 m2/g (see Figures 1(b), 1(f), and 1(j)). The significant increase in the magnitude of Si-O-Si stretching, H-O-H bending, and Si-OH stretching bands of NSIx specimens is attributed to the increased amounts of Si-O-Si, H-O-H, and Si-OH groups exposed on NSIx particles with higher specific surface areas.Figure 1
FTIR spectra of (a)PEg-MAH, (b) NSI600, (c) FNSI600m3, (d) FNSI600m9, (e) FNSI600m12, (f) NSI300, (g) FNSI300m3, (h) FNSI300m6, (i) FNSI300m9, (j) NSI100, (k) FNSI100m2, (l) FNSI100m3, and (m) FNSI100m6 specimens (the superscript x denotes the quoted specific surface areas of virgin NSIx nanosilica particles; y denotes the weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx used in the preparation processes of FNSIxmy functionalized nanosilica particles).After graftingPEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles, the peak magnitudes corresponding to H-O-H bending and Si-OH stretching bands of FNSIxmy specimens reduced significantly as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSIx increased (see Figures 1(b) to 1(e), 1(f) to 1(i), and 1(j) to 1(m)). In fact, as shown in Figures 1(d) to 1(e), 1(h) to 1(i), and 1(l) to 1(m), H-O-H bending and Si-OH stretching bands originally present in NSIx specimens disappeared almost completely as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my specimens were equal to or more than 3, 6, and 9, respectively. In the meantime, a new absorption band centered at around 1228 cm−1 corresponding to the motion of ester C-O stretching vibration [31] was found in the spectra of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my specimens (see Figures 1(c) to 1(e), 1(g) to 1(i), and 1(k) to 1(m)). In contrast, the absorption bands centered at 1711 and 1791 cm−1 corresponding to the motion of C=O and O-C=O stretching vibrations of maleic anhydride gradually reappeared as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my specimens, respectively, were equal to 6, 9, and 12. Presumably, the gradually disappearing H-O-H bending and Si-OH stretching bands and newly developed ester C-O stretching bands of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my specimens are attributed to the reaction of the hydroxyl groups of NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles with the maleic anhydride groups of PEg-MAH molecules during their functionalized processes. The reappearance of O-C=O and C=O stretching bands of maleic anhydride groups is most likely due to the overdosage of PEg-MAH during the functionalized processes of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my particles.


## 3.2. Morphological Analyses ofNSIx and FNSIxmy Particles

Figure2 exhibits typical TEM micrographs of NSIx and FNSIxmy particles. Typical irregular particle feature with dimensions of 250–350, 150–200, and 50–80 nm in diameter was observed for NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles (see Figures 2(a), 2(d), and 2(g)). After modification by PEg-MAH, some translucent resins were found attaching on the surfaces of NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles, wherein the amounts of attached translucent resins increased gradually as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 increased, respectively (see Figures 2(b) to 2(c), 2(e) to 2(g), and 2(h) to 2(i)). As evidenced by FTIR analyses in the previous section, the attached translucent resins were most likely the grafted PEg-MAH molecules, which were firmly bonded to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles by the reaction of the maleic anhydride groups of PEg-MAH resins with the hydroxyl groups of NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles, respectively. In fact, the translucent resins were found fully surrounding and overwrapping on NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles, as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 were greater than 3, 6, and 12, respectively (see Figures 2(c), 2(f), and 2(i)).Figure 2
TEM micrographs of (a) NSI100, (b) FNSI100m3, (c) FNSI100m6, (d) NSI300, (e) FNSI300m6, (f) FNSI300m9, (g) NSI600, (h) FNSI600m9, and (i) FNSI600m12 specimens.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)


## 3.3. Specific Surface Area Analyses ofNSIx and FNSIxmy Particles

The values of specific surface areas ofNSIx and FNSIxmy particles are summarized in Figure 3 and Table 1. The specific surface areas of NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles were evaluated at around 100, 300, and 600 m2/g (i.e., 102.3, 303.9, and 601.7 m2/g), respectively. After modification by PEg-MAH, the specific surface areas of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my particles reached a maximal value at 129.8, 335.8, and 630.7 m2/g, respectively, as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 approached an optimal value at 3, 6, and 9, respectively. Presumably, the beneficial effect of PEg-MAH contents on specific surface areas of FNSIxmy particles is attributed to the increase in grafted amounts and specific surface areas of PEg-MAH on NSIx particles during their functionalized processes. However, PEg-MAH molecules may agglomerate, bundle, entangle together, and overwrap NSIx particles, as PEg-MAH molecules are superfluous and can no longer graft onto NSIx particles. As evidenced by morphology analyses in the previous section, some translucent resins were found fully surrounding and overwrapping on NSIx particles (see Figures 2(c), 2(g), and 2(i)), as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 were more than 3, 6, and 9, respectively. Based on this premise, it is reasonable to infer that the overwrapped FNSIxmy particles exhibit relatively lower specific surface areas than those FNSI100m3, FNSI300m6, and FNSI600m9 particles grafted with proper amounts of PEg-MAH resins.Figure 3
Specific surface areas of carbon nanofiber (∙), NSI100 (◆), NSI300 (■), NSI600 (▲), FNSI100my (◊), FNSI300my (□), FNSI600my (△), and modified carbon nanofiber (∘) specimens.


## 3.4. Thermal Properties of the As-Prepared Fibers

Typical DSC thermograms, melting temperature (Tm), percentage crystallinity (Xc), and evaluated lamellar thickness (lc) values of UHMWPE (F100), UHMWPE/NSI (F100NSIxz), and UHMWPE/FNSI (F100FNSIxmy-z) as-prepared fiber series specimens are summarized in Figure 4 and Table 2. A main melting endotherm with Tm and Xc at 142.7°C and 65.1%, respectively, was found for F100 specimen. After incorporation of NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles in UHMWPE, Tm (or evaluated lc) values of F100NSIxz (i.e., F100NSI100z, F100NSI300z, and F100NSI600z) and/or F100FNSIxmy-z (i.e., F100FNSI100my-z, F100FNSI300my-z, and F100FNSI600my-z) as-prepared fibers reduced to a minimal value, as their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents reached an optimal value, respectively, in which Tm and lc values of F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents at 0.075, 0.05, and 0.0375 phr, respectively, were significantly lower than those of the corresponding F100NSI1000.1, F100NSI3000.0625, and F100NSI6000.05 as-prepared fibers with an optimal NSIx content at 0.1, 0.0625, and 0.05 phr, respectively. However, Xc values of F100NSIxz and/or F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers increased to a maximal value, as NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents reached their corresponding optimal values, respectively, wherein Xc values of F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at their optimal FNSIxmy contents, respectively, were significantly higher than those of the corresponding F100NSI1000.1, F100NSI3000.0625, and F100NSI6000.05 as-prepared fibers prepared at their optimal NSIx contents, respectively. Moreover, it is worth noting that F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents exhibited another minimal Tm (or evaluated lc) but other maximal Xc values as their FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my were modified using an optimal weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 at 3, 6, and 9, respectively (see Figures 5(j), 6(i), and 7(h)). Finally, it is interesting to note that the lowest Tm (or evaluated lc) values obtained for F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx reduced significantly as the specific surface areas of FNSIxmy particles increased, while the highest Xc values obtained for F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers increased consistently as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased. For instance, Tm values of F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers reduced from 138.3°C to 137.6°C and to 136.1°C, as the specific surface areas of FNSI100m3, FNSI300m6, and FNSI600m9 present in F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers increased from 129.8 to 335.8 and 630.7 m2/g, respectively, while their Xc values increased from 75.4% to 76.0% and 76.8%, as the specific surface areas of FNSI100m3, FNSI300m6, and FNSI600m9 present in F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers increased from 129.8 to 335.8 and 630.7 m2/g, respectively.Figure 4
DSC thermograms of (a) F100, (b) F100FNSI600m3-0.025, (c) F100FNSI600m3-0.0375, (d) F100FNSI600m3-0.05, (e) F100FNSI600m3-0.625, (f) F100FNSI600m3-0.075, (g) F100FNSI600m9-0.025, (h) F100FNSI600m9-0.0375, (i) F100FNSI600m9-0.05, (j) F100FNSI600m9-0.625, (k) F100FNSI600m9-0.075, (l) F100FNSI600m12-0.025, (m) F100FNSI600m12-0.0375, (n) F100FNSI600m12-0.05, (o) F100FNSI600m12-0.0625, and (p) F100FNSI600m12-0.075 as-prepared fibers.Figure 5
Achievable draw ratios as-prepared fibers.Figure 6
The orientation factor (f0) values as-prepared and drawn fibers with varying draw ratios.Figure 7
SEM micrographs of F100 fibers with a draw ratio of (a) 1, (b) 50, and (c) 100; F100FNSI100m3-0.075 fibers with a draw ratio of (d) 1, (e) 50, and (f) 100; F100FNSI300m6-0.05 fibers with a draw ratio of (g) 1, (h) 50, and (i) 100; and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 fibers with a draw ratio of (j) 1, (k) 50, and (l) 100.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)As evidenced by specific surface area and TEM analyses in the previous sections,NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles are with a wide range of relatively large surface areas per volume, which make them in close proximity to a large fraction of the UHMWPE matrix. Apparently, even very small contents of dispersed NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles can serve as efficient nucleation sites for UHMWPE molecules during their gel spinning processes. These efficient nucleation sites of NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles then facilitate the crystallization of UHMWPE molecules into crystals with thinner lamellar thickness and/or lower Tm values during their crystallization processes. After grafting PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 particles, the properly modified FNSIxmy particles with even higher specific surface areas are likely to disperse better in UHMWPE and serve as more effective sites for nucleation of UHMWPE molecules during their gel spinning processes than NSIx particles. As a consequence, F100FNSI100my-z, F100FNSI300my-z, and F100FNSI600my-z as-prepared fiber specimens exhibit significantly higher Xc but lower Tm (or evaluated lc) values than the corresponding F100NSI100z, F100NSI300z, and F100NSI600z as-prepared fiber specimens prepared with the same NSIx contents but without modification by PEg-MAH, respectively. Moreover, the minimal Tm (or evaluated lc) values obtained for F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx, respectively, reduced significantly as the specific surface areas of FNSIxmy particles increased, while the highest Xc values obtained for F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers increased consistently as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased.


## 3.5. Achievable Draw Ratios of the As-Prepared Fibers

Figure5 summarized the achievable draw ratio (achievable λ) values of F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fiber specimens prepared at varying NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents, respectively. For comparison purposes, achievable λ values of the best prepared UHMWPE/functionalized carbon nanotube (FCNT) as-prepared fibers (i.e., F100Cf2-0.1 specimens) obtained in our previous investigations [24] were also summarized in Figure 5, in which, functionalized carbon nanotubes are with relatively high (i.e., 272.7 m2/g) but significantly lower specific surface areas than those of FNSI300my and FNSI600my particles prepared in this study. After addition with NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles in UHMWPE, the achievable λ values of F100NSIxz and/or F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers increased initially and reached a maximal value as their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents approached an optimal value, respectively, in which the achievable λ values of F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents at 0.075, 0.05, and 0.0375 phr, respectively, were significantly higher than those of the corresponding F100NSI1000.1, F100NSI3000.0625, and F100NSI6000.05 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal NSIx contents at 0.1, 0.0625, and 0.05 phr, respectively. Moreover, it is worth noting that F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents exhibited other maximal achievable λ values at 176, 289, and 361, respectively, as their FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my particles were modified using an optimal weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 at 3, 6, and 9, respectively. It is further interesting to note that the highest achievable λ values obtained for the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSIx improved significantly as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased. In fact, the maximal achievable λ value (i.e., 361) obtained for F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fiber is about 2.05 and 1.25 times of those of F100FNSI100m3-0.075 and the best prepared UHMWPE/FCNT as-prepared fibers and is 2.85 times of that of F100 as-prepared fiber without addition of original and/or modified nanosilica particles.


## 3.6. Orientation Factor Analyses of the As-Prepared and Drawn Fiber Specimens

Typical orientation factor (f0) values of F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared and drawn fibers are summarized in Figure 6. No significant difference in f0 values was found for F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers. As expected, f0 values of F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z fibers increased consistently as their draw ratios increased. After addition of NSIxz and/or FNSIxmy-z particles, f0 values of drawn F100NSIxz and/or F100FNSIxmy-z fibers were significantly higher than those of drawn F100 fibers with the same draw ratios. f0 values of drawn F100NSIxz fibers with a fixed draw ratio reached a maximal value as their NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 contents approached the optimal values at 0.1, 0.0625, and 0.05 phr, respectively. Similarly, f0 values of each drawn F100FNSIxmy-z fiber series specimen reached a maximal value as their FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my contents approached an optimal value at 0.075, 0.05, and 0.0375 phr, respectively, in which, f0 values of drawn F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents were significantly higher than those of the corresponding drawn F100NSI1000.1, F100NSI3000.0625, and F100NSI6000.05 fibers prepared with the same draw ratios and at an optimal NSIx content, respectively. Moreover, it is worth noting that F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 drawn fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents exhibited other maximal f0 values as their FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my particles were modified using an optimal weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 at 3, 6, and 9, respectively. It is further interesting to note that the maximal f0 values obtained for the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSIx improved significantly as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased.As evidenced by thermal and lamellar thickness analyses,Tm (or evaluated lc) values of F100NSIxz and/or F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers reduced to a minimal value, as their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents reached an optimal value, respectively. Moreover, the lowest Tm (or evaluated lc) values obtained for the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx reduced significantly as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased. Presumably, these crystals with lower Tm and/or evaluated lc values can be melted and pulled out of folded lamellar crystals relatively easily during the ultradrawing processes, and hence this results in higher drawability and orientation of the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 fibers, in which, the drawability and orientation of the best prepared fibers improved significantly as the specific surface areas of FNSI100m3, FNSI300m6, and FNSI600m9 present in F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared and/or drawn fibers increased. However, the amounts of coagulated NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles are likely to increase significantly when their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents are higher than certain values, respectively. These coagulated NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles can slide against each other and serve as the defects for stress concentration during the drawing processes of F100NSIxz and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers and hence lead to an early breakage and/or significant reduction in achievable λ and f0 values of the resulting drawn fibers. Based on these premises, it is reasonable to understand that the achievable λ values of F100NSIxz and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers and f0 values of the drawn F100NSIxz and F100FNSIxmy-z fibers with a fixed draw ratio reduce significantly when their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents are higher than the specific optimal value, respectively.


## 3.7. Morphological Analyses of the As-Prepared and Drawn Fibers

Figure7 exhibits typical SEM micrographs of the as-prepared and drawn F100, F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 fibers with various draw ratios. Many demarcated drawn “micro-fibrils” were found paralleling the drawing direction of the drawn F100, F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 fibers as their draw ratios increased, wherein the thicknesses of these drawn micro-fibrils reduced significantly as the draw ratios increased. Moreover, more and thinner “micro-fibrils” were found on the surfaces of F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared and/or drawn fibers with the same draw ratio as the specific surface areas of their FNSI100m3, FNSI300m6, and FNSI600m9 particles increased.It is not completely clear what accounts for the interesting demarcated “micro-fibril” morphology found on the surfaces of F100, F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared and drawn fibers. Presumably, during the ultradrawing processes, many of the UHMWPE kebab crystals with relatively thinner lamellar thickness values can be unfolded and pulled out of the crystal lamellae in an easier way than those kebab crystals with thicker lamellar thickness values. The unfolded UHMWPE molecules pulled out from the kebab lamellae can then gradually transform into the oriented “micro-fibrils” during their ultradrawing processes. As evidenced by DSC analyses in the previous section, Tm (or evaluated lc) values of F100NSIxz and/or F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers were significantly lower than that of F100 as-prepared fiber and reached a minimal value, as their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents approached an optimal value, respectively, in which, the lowest Tm (or evaluated lc) values obtained for the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx reduced significantly as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased. Based on these premises, it is reasonable to infer that the “micro-fibrils” found on the surfaces of as-prepared and/or drawn F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 fibers are more and thinner than those of the corresponding as-prepared and/or drawn F100 fibers with the same draw ratios but without addition of any “nuclear” nanofillers. By the same analogy, more and thinner “micro-fibrils” are expected to be found on the surfaces of F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 as-prepared and/or drawn fibers as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased.


## 3.8. Tensile Properties

Tensile strength (σf) and modulus (E) values of F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers prepared at varying draw ratios are illustrated in Table 3. For comparison purposes, σf and E values of the best prepared UHMWPE/FCNT (i.e., F100Cf2-0.1) as-prepared fiber obtained in our previous investigation [24] were also summarized in Table 3. As expected, σf and E values of the drawn F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z fibers improve consistently as their draw ratios increase. It is worth noting that σf and E values of drawn F100NSIxz and F100FNSIxmy-z fibers are significantly higher than those of the corresponding drawn F100 fibers with the same draw ratio but without addition of NSIx and/or FNSIxmy particles. Similar to those found for their f0 values, σf and E values of drawn F100NSIxz and F100FNSIxmy-z fibers reach a maximal value as their NSIx and/or FNSIxmy contents approach the optimal values at 0.075, 0.05, and 0.0375 phr, respectively, in which σf and E values of drawn F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 fibers prepared at their optimal FNSIxmy contents are significantly higher than those of the corresponding drawn F100NSI1000.1, F100NSI3000.0625, and F100NSI6000.05 fibers with the same draw ratio and an optimal NSIx content at 0.1, 0.0625, and 0.05 phr, respectively. Moreover, at a fixed draw ratio, drawn F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents exhibited other maximal σf and E values, as their FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my particles were modified using an optimal weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 at 3, 6, and 9, respectively. It is interesting to note that the maximal σf and E values obtained for the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 drawn fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents and weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSIx increased significantly as the specific surface areas of FNSIxmy particles increased. For instance, the ultimate σf values of best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100Cf2-0.1, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 fibers reached 4.4, 5.1, 7.1, and 7.6 GPa, respectively, as the specific surface areas of FNSI100m3, FCNT, FNSI300my6, and FNSI600m9 particles increased from 129.8 to 272.7, 335.8 and to 630.7 m2/g, respectively. The ultimate σf value of the best prepared F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 drawn fiber is about 1.7 and 1.5 times of those of the F100FNSI100m3-0.075 and the best prepared UHMWPE/FCNT drawn fiber specimens, respectively, and is about 2.3 times of that of the best prepared UHMWPE drawn fibers prepared at the same optimal UHMWPE concentration and drawing condition but without addition of any nanofiller.Table 3
Tensile strength (σf) and modulus values (E) of UHMWPE (F100), UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica (F100FNSIxmy-z), and UHMWPE/carbon nanotube (F100Cf2-0.1) fiber specimens with varying draw ratios.
Draw ratio
Specimen
F100
F100Cf2-0.1
F100FNSI100m2-0.625
F100FNSI100m2-0.075
F100FNSI100m2-0.1
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
20
1.6
58.0
2.7
106.3
2.1
61.1
2.2
69.0
2.1
59.0
40
1.9
71.2
3.5
140.5
2.6
80.7
2.8
90.3
2.8
77.8
60
2.6
92.9
4.2
169.8
3.4
105.2
3.6
119.0
3.5
101.4
120
3.4
112.5
4.9
194.5
4.0
118.5
4.2
130.2
4.0
115.9
160
—
—
5.1
204.6
4.4
163.3
4.8
184.3
4.5
152.3
Draw ratio
Specimen
F100FNSI100m3-0.625
F100FNSI100m3-0.075
F100FNSI100m3-0.1
F100FNSI100m6-0.625
F100FNSI100m6-0.075
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
20
2.4
73.1
2.5
81.0
2.4
71.0
2.2
67.1
2.3
75.0
40
2.9
92.7
3.1
102.3
3.1
89.8
2.7
86.7
2.9
96.3
60
3.7
117.2
3.9
131.0
3.8
113.4
3.5
111.2
3.7
125.0
120
4.3
130.5
4.5
142.2
4.3
127.9
4.1
124.5
4.3
136.2
160
4.6
175.3
5.0
196.3
4.8
164.3
4.4
169.3
4.8
190.3
Draw ratio
Specimen
F100FNSI100m6-0.1
F100FNSI300m3-0.375
F100FNSI300m3-0.5
F100FNSI300m3-0.075
F100FNSI300m6-0.375
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
20
2.2
65.0
2.5
79.3
2.6
84.2
2.3
75.9
2.9
93.3
40
2.9
83.8
3.2
108.3
3.3
112.9
2.8
102.9
3.6
122.3
60
3.6
107.4
4.1
151.7
4.2
156.7
3.9
147.0
4.5
165.7
120
4.1
121.9
4.7
172.7
4.9
176.9
4.4
167.6
5.1
186.7
160
4.6
158.3
5.7
184.9
5.8
187.9
5.5
183.9
6.1
198.9
200
—
—
6.0
188.1
6.1
192.6
5.9
189.2
6.4
202.1
Draw ratio
Specimen
F100FNSI300m6-0.5
F100FNSI300m6-0.075
F100FNSI300m9-0.375
F100FNSI300m9-0.5
F100FNSI300m9-0.075
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
20
3.0
98.2
2.7
89.9
2.6
86.3
2.7
91.2
2.4
82.9
40
3.7
126.9
3.2
116.9
3.3
115.3
3.4
119.9
2.9
109.9
60
4.6
170.7
4.3
161.0
4.2
158.7
4.3
163.7
4.0
154.0
120
5.3
190.9
4.8
181.6
4.8
179.7
5.0
183.9
4.5
174.6
160
6.2
201.9
5.9
197.9
5.8
191.9
5.9
194.9
5.6
190.9
200
6.5
206.6
6.3
203.2
6.1
195.1
6.2
199.6
6.0
196.2
Draw ratio
Specimen
F100FNSI600m6-0.025
F100FNSI600m6-0.0375
F100FNSI600m6-0.05
F100FNSI600m9-0.025
F100FNSI600m9-0.0375
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
20
2.5
93.5
2.8
101.2
2.6
96.5
2.9
109.5
3.2
117.2
40
3.2
116.7
3.5
128.1
3.3
126.1
3.6
132.7
3.9
144.1
60
4.3
156.8
4.4
163.4
4.3
158.8
4.7
172.8
4.8
179.4
120
4.9
181.5
5.2
190.8
5.0
184.1
5.3
197.5
5.6
206.8
160
6.0
221.2
6.2
227.4
6.1
223.9
6.4
237.2
6.6
243.4
200
6.2
230.5
6.4
236.4
6.4
234.8
6.6
246.5
6.8
252.4
240
6.5
239.7
6.6
245.7
6.5
241.4
6.9
255.7
7.0
261.7
280
6.6
244.9
6.8
247.2
6.6
245.0
7.0
260.9
7.1
263.2
320
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7.2
266.0
360
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7.4
273.7
Draw ratio
Specimen
F100FNSI600m9-0.05
F100FNSI600m12-0.025
F100FNSI600m12-0.0375
F100FNSI600m12-0.05
—
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
σ
f (GPa)
E (GPa)
—
20
3.0
112.5
2.4
100.5
3.0
108.2
2.8
103.5
—
40
3.8
142.1
3.4
123.7
3.7
135.1
3.6
133.1
—
60
4.7
174.8
4.5
163.8
4.6
170.4
4.5
165.8
—
120
5.4
200.1
5.1
188.5
5.4
197.8
5.2
191.1
—
160
6.5
239.9
6.2
228.2
6.4
234.4
6.3
230.9
—
200
6.8
250.8
6.4
237.5
6.6
243.4
6.6
241.8
—
240
6.9
257.4
6.7
246.7
6.8
252.7
6.7
248.4
—
280
7.0
261.0
6.8
251.9
6.9
254.2
6.8
252.0
—
320
—
—
—
—
7.0
257.0
—
—
—The mechanical properties of the drawn specimens are generally believed to depend mainly on the degree of orientation of the drawn specimens, as their molecular weights are constant [16, 34]. As evidenced by orientation analyses in the previous section, at a fixed draw ratio, f0 values of drawn F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 fibers prepared at the optimal FNSIxmy contents were significantly higher than those of the corresponding F100NSI1000.1, F100NSI3000.0625, and F100NSI6000.05 fibers prepared at an optimal NSIx content, respectively. Moreover, f0 values of F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 drawn fibers were always higher than those of other F100FNSI100my-0.075, F100FNSI300my-0.05, and F100FNSI600my-0.0375 fibers prepared with the same draw ratios and FNSI contents but modified using an optimal weight ratio of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 other than 3, 6, and 9, respectively. In fact, the maximal f0 values obtained for the best prepared F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375 drawn fibers improved significantly as the specific surface areas of their FNSIxmy particles increased. These results clearly suggest that a good orientation of UHMWPE molecules along the drawing direction positively affects the tensile properties of F100, F100NSIxz, and F100FNSIxmy-z fibers. Excellent orientation and ultimate tensile properties of UHMWPE/nanofiller fibers can be prepared by the ultradrawing of F100FNSIxmy-z as-prepared fibers with optimal contents of the best prepared FNSI100m3, FNSI300m6, and FNSI600m9 particles well dispersing in their as-prepared fibers. Moreover, the specific surface areas of well-dispersed functionalized nanofillers in UHMWPE/functionalized nanofiller fibers can positively affect their ultradrawing, orientation, ultimate tensile properties, and “micro-fibrils” morphologies.


## 4. Conclusions

As evidenced by FTIR and TEM analyses,PEg-MAH molecules were successfully grafted onto nanosilica particles with varying specific surface areas through the reaction of the hydroxyl groups of nanosilica particles with the maleic anhydride groups of PEg-MAH molecules during their functionalized processes. The specific surface areas of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my functionalized nanosilica particles reached a maximal value at 129.8, 335.8, and 630.7 m2/g, respectively, as the weight ratios of PEg-MAH to NSI100, NSI300, and NSI600 nanosilica particles of FNSI100my, FNSI300my, and FNSI600my functionalized nanosilica particles approached an optimal value at 3, 6, and 9, respectively. The specific surface areas of well-dispersed functionalized nanosilica particles in UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica fibers were found to affect positively on the achievable λ, percentage crystallinity, ultimate tensile strength values, and “micro-fibrils” morphologies of the UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica as-prepared fibers. The achievable λ values of the best prepared UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica as-prepared fibers (i.e., F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375) improved consistently from 176 to 289 and 361, as the specific surface areas of the incorporated functionalized nanosilica particles increased from 129.8 to 335.8 and 630.7 m2/g, respectively. Similar to those found for the achievable drawing properties of the best prepared UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica as-prepared fibers, the orientation factor, ultimate σf and E values of the best prepared UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica drawn fibers (i.e., F100FNSI100m3-0.075, F100FNSI300m6-0.05, and F100FNSI600m9-0.0375) with a fixed draw improved positively, as the specific surface areas of added functionalized nanosilica particles increased from 129.8 to 335.8 and 630.7 m2/g. For instance, the ultimate σf values of the best prepared UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica drawn fibers improved significantly from 4.4 to 7.1 and 7.6 GPa, respectively, as the specific surface areas of functionalized nanosilica particles increased from 129.8 to 335.8 and 630.7 m2/g, respectively. The maximal ultimate σf value (i.e., 7.6 GPa) of the best prepared UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica drawn fiber with the highest specific surface area of functionalized nanosilica is about 2.3 times of that of the best prepared UHMWPE drawn fiber prepared at the same optimal UHMWPE concentration and drawing condition but without addition of any nanofiller. The “micro-fibrils” found on the surfaces of UHMWPE/functionalized nanosilica drawn fibers with the same draw ratio became more and thinner as the specific surface areas of their functionalized nanosilica particles increased. Possible reasons accounting for the above interesting properties were reported in this study.



---

*Source: 146718-2015-10-01.xml*