# SCAR Marker for Identification and Discrimination ofCommiphora wightii andC. myrrha

Authors: Pramod Kumar Sairkar; Anjana Sharma; N. P. Shukla
Journal: Molecular Biology International
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Commercially importantCommiphora species are drought-tolerant plants and they are leafless for most of the year. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some molecular marker for the identification. Intended for that, in the present study, species-specific, sequence-characterized amplified regions (SCAR) markers were developed for proficient and precise identification of closely related speciesCommiphora wightii andC. myrrha, which may ensure the quality, safety, and efficacy of medicines made from these plants through adulterous mixing of these plants. Two species-specific RAPD amplicons were selected, gel-purified, cloned, and sequenced after screening of 20 RAPD primers. The sequence of 979 and 590 nucleotides (Genebank accession numbers K90051 and K90052) was used for development of 4 SCAR markers, namely, Sc1P, Sc1Pm, Sc2P, and Sc2Pm. Out of them, the Sc1Pm was specific forC. wightii, while Sc2P discriminated both theCommiphora species. These markers are first reported and will be useful for rapid identification of closely relatedCommiphora wightii andC. myrrha species.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Commiphora spp. of the familyBurseraceae is being used as a medicinal plant since ancient times and now rated as an endangered plant species [1]. They are found in the arid to semiarid regions of the world, including the deserts of India, Pakistan, Africa, and Saudi Arabia, while in India, it is found in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamilnadu, Orissa, and Karnataka. About 185 species ofCommiphora were found worldwide, out of themC. wightii (synonymC. mukul),C. agallocha,C. stocksiana,C. berryi, andC. myrrha were found in India [2, 3]. In earlier studies about the flora of India, the “Guggul” plant was known asCommiphora mukul (Hook ex Stocks) Engl. orBalsamodendron mukul (Hook ex Stocks). Finally, it was named asC. wightii (Arn.) by Bhandari in 1964.C. wightii was well-documented medicinal plant since 3000 years ago [4], having exciting biological activities like being anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, hepatoprotective, muscle relaxing, antiarthritic, hypolipidemic, hypocholesterolemic, antiobesity, antioxidant, antimalarial, antimycobacterial, antischistosomal, larvicidal, and mollucidal [2, 3, 5–19].C. wightii contains a bitter gum known as Guggul (Myrrh) in stems and leaves. The yellowish gum oozes upon making an incision and solidifies in the hot environment to a hard brownish resin. Guggul is medicinally important and is used in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular diseases [9, 20]; it is also shown to have anticancerous activity [21]. The extract of gum Guggul, as gugulipid, guggulipid, or guglipid, is reported as a folk remedy in the Unani and Ayurvedic system of medicine. Two trans-isomers of Guggulsterone, namely, Guggulsterones E and Z, were reported in gum Guggul as important active steroid which are used as cholesterol-lowering agents. The pharmacological properties associated with gum Guggul include anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anticoagulant, antirheumatic, COX inhibitory, and hypolipidemic activities that are mostly due to the presence of these steroids [22, 23]. In 1986, Guggul lipids were granted approval in India for marketing as a lipid-lowering drug [24]. Several products of standardized formulations ofC. wightii were already in human use as cholesterol-lowering agents [22, 25].Commiphora species have been called “taxonomically difficult,” because of being drought-tolerant plants and they are leafless for most of the year [26]. There is resemblance of gum Guggul with gum resin of other species within and outside of the genus, which make high risk of adulteration in commercial samples either deliberately to get more profit or accidentally. Therefore, it is important to validate theC. wightii plants and their gum Guggul in commercial samples due to its various pharmacological significances [27]. Many types of markers, namely, morphological, biochemical, and DNA based molecular markers, are commonly used in the identification of species [28]. Molecular markers were used in the identification of species and individual, their origin, and difference at the molecular level in between them [29]. During the last few decades, the use of molecular markers, revealing polymorphism at the DNA level, has been playing an increasing part in plant biotechnology and their genetic studies. These DNA based markers are differentiated into two types: first is non-PCR based RFLP and second is PCR based markers (RAPD, AFLP, SSR, SNP, etc.) [30]. RAPD is a PCR-based technology, based on enzymatic amplification of target or random DNA segments with arbitrary primers. The main advantage of RAPDs is that they are quick and easy to assay, had no sequence data required for primer construction, randomly distributed throughout the genome, and had a dominant nature [31]. However, RAPD marker is not suitable for the species identification, because of their low reproducibility and dominant nature [32]. A RAPD marker can be converted into a codominant and reproducible marker, that is, Sequence-Characterized Amplified Region (SCAR), which may be applicable for authentication of species.Looking upon these problems, it is necessary to develop some molecular marker for the identification ofC. wightii. In the present study, an attempt has been made for the development of SCAR markers forC. wightii.


## 2. Materials and Methods

Total 28 accessions of two different species ofCommiphora, that is,C. wightii (17) andC. myrrha (11), were collected from Bhopal, Obaidullaganj (Madhya Pradesh), Akola (Maharashtra), Anand (Gujarat), and Jaipur (Rajasthan), and conserved at MPCST Human Herbal Health Care Garden, Bhopal.


### 2.1. Selection of RAPD Primers and Amplicons

Genomic DNA was isolated from fresh young stemC. wightii andC. myrrha using the method of Sairkar et al. (unpublished). The yield of DNA was measured using a NanoDrop UV-Spectrophotometer (ND-1000). Genomic DNA was amplified by the 20 primers (Table 1). A cocktail of 40 μL reaction volumes was made with 20 μL, 2x red dye PCR mix (Merck), 1 μL primer (10 pM), and 1 μL template DNA (25 ng/μL) and amplification was performed on the gradient automatic thermal cycler (Eppendorf) following Sairkar et al. [33]. The PCR products were separated electrophoretically on 1.5% agarose gel at 5–10 volts/cm of the gel and visualized by ethidium bromide. The specific amplicon, which discriminates betweenC. wightii andC. myrrha, was selected and processed for the development of SCAR marker.Table 1
Sequence of SCAR markers designed using 1 kb amplicon.
Name of SCAR
Name of fragments
Sequence (5′-3′)
Total length
Temp
Size (bp)
Sc1P
Sc1P (F)
CTGTGAGGCATTTGTATATTTAA
23 bases
60°C
631
Sc1P (R)
CTTGTGGTCTTTCAGTCAATAG
22 bases
62°C
Sc1Pm
Sc1P (F)
CTGTGAGGCATTTGTATATTTAA
23 bases
60°C
910
Sc1Pm (R)
CTTGAGAACGAAATCTAACAAG
22 bases
60°C


### 2.2. Cloning of Selected RAPD Amplicon

The selected amplicons were eluted using Medox-Easy Spin Column Cleanup Minipreps kit and ligated with the TA cloning vector (pGEM5Z, Promega). The ligated TA vector was transformed into competent cells ofE. coli (DH5α), which was prepared using single step ultracompetent cell preparation kit (Medox). The first selection of recombinant clones was based on developed blue and white colonies on LB (Luria Burtani) agar plates containing 0.5 mg/mL ampicillin, 24 μg/mL IPTG, and 30 μg/mL X-gal. The plasmid of white and blue colonies was isolated through Medox-Easy ultrapure spin column plasmid DNA minipreps kit. Three selection steps, that is, clone retardation, restriction digestion, and amplification of plasmid, were adopted to identify positive insert within the plasmid. In retardation step, plasmids were separated electrophoretically to observe the presence of insert within plasmid, while in restriction digestion, plasmids were digested with PvuII enzyme for insert release. In the final step, the plasmids were amplified through the PCR reaction using 50 μL that consist of 25 μL 2x red dye PCR mix (Merck), 1 μL each of forward and reverse M-13 primers (10 pM each), 1 μL of plasmid DNA (25 ng/μL) with a PCR profile of 94°C for 12 minutes, 30 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 55°C and 45 seconds at 72°C, and final extension on 72°C at 10 minutes using the gradient automatic thermal cycler (Eppendorf).


### 2.3. Designing and Screening of SCAR Marker

Plasmid having desired amplicon was sequenced by Aristogene Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India, using M13 reverse and forward sequencing primers and consensus sequence of amplicons was developed. The homology search of consensus sequences was performed by the NCBI BLAST tool. The primer pairs were designed for these sequences by using PRIMER 3 software [34] and used as a candidate for SCAR primer. Four accessions of each species ofC. wightii andC. myrrha were amplified through these primer pairs (synthesized by Aristogene) with a cocktail of 40 μL containing 20 μL of 2x red dye PCR mix (Merck), 1 μL of each of the SCAR primer pair (10 pM each), and 1 μL of template DNA (25 ng/μL). Amplification was performed on the gradient automatic thermal cycler (Eppendorf) with PCR conditions: 94°C for 5 minutes, 30 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 58°C and 1 minute at 72°C, and final extension on 72°C at 10 minutes. Among the all designed primer pairs, suitable primer pair was selected which discriminate the both species ofCommiphora and further screened in all the accessions for validation of SCAR marker.


## 2.1. Selection of RAPD Primers and Amplicons

Genomic DNA was isolated from fresh young stemC. wightii andC. myrrha using the method of Sairkar et al. (unpublished). The yield of DNA was measured using a NanoDrop UV-Spectrophotometer (ND-1000). Genomic DNA was amplified by the 20 primers (Table 1). A cocktail of 40 μL reaction volumes was made with 20 μL, 2x red dye PCR mix (Merck), 1 μL primer (10 pM), and 1 μL template DNA (25 ng/μL) and amplification was performed on the gradient automatic thermal cycler (Eppendorf) following Sairkar et al. [33]. The PCR products were separated electrophoretically on 1.5% agarose gel at 5–10 volts/cm of the gel and visualized by ethidium bromide. The specific amplicon, which discriminates betweenC. wightii andC. myrrha, was selected and processed for the development of SCAR marker.Table 1
Sequence of SCAR markers designed using 1 kb amplicon.
Name of SCAR
Name of fragments
Sequence (5′-3′)
Total length
Temp
Size (bp)
Sc1P
Sc1P (F)
CTGTGAGGCATTTGTATATTTAA
23 bases
60°C
631
Sc1P (R)
CTTGTGGTCTTTCAGTCAATAG
22 bases
62°C
Sc1Pm
Sc1P (F)
CTGTGAGGCATTTGTATATTTAA
23 bases
60°C
910
Sc1Pm (R)
CTTGAGAACGAAATCTAACAAG
22 bases
60°C


## 2.2. Cloning of Selected RAPD Amplicon

The selected amplicons were eluted using Medox-Easy Spin Column Cleanup Minipreps kit and ligated with the TA cloning vector (pGEM5Z, Promega). The ligated TA vector was transformed into competent cells ofE. coli (DH5α), which was prepared using single step ultracompetent cell preparation kit (Medox). The first selection of recombinant clones was based on developed blue and white colonies on LB (Luria Burtani) agar plates containing 0.5 mg/mL ampicillin, 24 μg/mL IPTG, and 30 μg/mL X-gal. The plasmid of white and blue colonies was isolated through Medox-Easy ultrapure spin column plasmid DNA minipreps kit. Three selection steps, that is, clone retardation, restriction digestion, and amplification of plasmid, were adopted to identify positive insert within the plasmid. In retardation step, plasmids were separated electrophoretically to observe the presence of insert within plasmid, while in restriction digestion, plasmids were digested with PvuII enzyme for insert release. In the final step, the plasmids were amplified through the PCR reaction using 50 μL that consist of 25 μL 2x red dye PCR mix (Merck), 1 μL each of forward and reverse M-13 primers (10 pM each), 1 μL of plasmid DNA (25 ng/μL) with a PCR profile of 94°C for 12 minutes, 30 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 55°C and 45 seconds at 72°C, and final extension on 72°C at 10 minutes using the gradient automatic thermal cycler (Eppendorf).


## 2.3. Designing and Screening of SCAR Marker

Plasmid having desired amplicon was sequenced by Aristogene Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India, using M13 reverse and forward sequencing primers and consensus sequence of amplicons was developed. The homology search of consensus sequences was performed by the NCBI BLAST tool. The primer pairs were designed for these sequences by using PRIMER 3 software [34] and used as a candidate for SCAR primer. Four accessions of each species ofC. wightii andC. myrrha were amplified through these primer pairs (synthesized by Aristogene) with a cocktail of 40 μL containing 20 μL of 2x red dye PCR mix (Merck), 1 μL of each of the SCAR primer pair (10 pM each), and 1 μL of template DNA (25 ng/μL). Amplification was performed on the gradient automatic thermal cycler (Eppendorf) with PCR conditions: 94°C for 5 minutes, 30 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 58°C and 1 minute at 72°C, and final extension on 72°C at 10 minutes. Among the all designed primer pairs, suitable primer pair was selected which discriminate the both species ofCommiphora and further screened in all the accessions for validation of SCAR marker.


## 3. Result

### 3.1. Identification of RAPD Primer and Amplicon

Out of 20 RAPD primers, 1 kb amplicon of OPD-02 and 0.6 kb amplicon of OPD-08 discriminate bothCommiphora species as it was present only inC. wightii accessions (Figure 1(a)). Due to specificity of these amplicons, they were cloned, sequenced, and used for SCAR marker development. These bands were elected from agarose gels and gel electrophoresis revealed that they were appropriate for cloning (Figure 1(b)).Figure 1
Selection and elution of desired amplicon. (a) PCR product of sampleCommiphora wightii on low melting agarose gel. Lanes 1 and 2 amplified by primers OPD-02 and OPD-08. (b) Eluted desired amplicon run on agarose gel. Lanes 1 and 2, fragment sizes 1 kb and 0.6 kb, respectively.
(a)
(b)


### 3.2. Cloning and Selection of Positive Clone

White colony of competent cells (E. coli) having T vector with 1 kb and 0.6 kb insert was undertaken for plasmid isolation and three selection criteria were performed for the conformation of positive clone. The screening for retardation checking reveals that 17 positive plasmids for 1 kb insert and 5 positive plasmids for 0.6 kb may have proper insert (Figure 2). These positive plasmids were digested with the restriction endonuclease (PvuII) for insert release. A total of 6 positive plasmids of 1 kb insert and 4 positive plasmids of 0.6 kb insert release their respective insert fragment (Figure 3). In the third stage of selection, 4 positive plasmids for 1 kb insert 3 positive plasmids for 0.6 kb insert were finalized for sequencing after amplify with M-13 primer (Figure 4).Figure 2
Retardation checking by plasmid run on agarose gel; Lanes 1 to 21: positive cloned plasmids 1 to 21, B: negative cloned plasmid isolated from blue colony.Figure 3
Insert release, digested plasmids by restriction endonuclease PvuII run on agarose gel, plasmid of Lanes 1, 2, 4, and 5 realised 1 kb fragment after digestion.Figure 4
Amplification of plasmid by vector primers (M-13). Lane 1, 2, 3 and 9 produced 1 kb fragment while lanes 4, 5, and 6 produced 0.6 kb fragment.


### 3.3. Sequencing andIn Silico Application

The clones were sequenced and 979 bp and 590 bp consensus sequences were formed for 1 kb insert 0.6 kb insert, respectively (Figures5 and 6). The BLAST search was performed for the obtained sequences and no significant homologous sequence was found in the NCBI database. This DNA sequences were deposited in the NCBI gene bank database with accession numbers K90051 and K90052. Two candidate SCAR primer pairs for each DNA sequences were designed, that is, primers Sc1P and Sc1Pm from 979 bp sequences and primer Sc2P and Sc1Pm from 590 bp sequences (Tables 1 and 2). These primers were deposited in the NCBI Prob database with accession number Pr031905450 to Pr031905453.Table 2
Sequence of SCAR markers designed from 0.6 kb amplicon.
Name of SCAR
Name of fragments
Sequence (5′-3′)
Total length
Temp.
Size (bp)
Sc2P
Sc2P (F)
GTACCCAATGTAGTAATATTCC
22 bases
60°C
491
Sc2P (R)
TAGTTAGTTTGATGACCATCACA
23 bases
62°C
Sc2Pm
Sc2P (F)
GTACCCAATGTAGTAATATTCC
22 bases
60°C
570
Sc2Pm (R)
GTGTGCCCCATTCAACCAAT
20 bases
60°CFigure 5
Consensus sequence (979 bp) of 1 kb fragment (Genebank ID K90051). Red highlights: vector sequence. Green highlight: SCAR primer region. Blue highlight: second reverse SCAR primer. Pink highlight: RAPD primer region.Figure 6
Consensus sequence (590 bp) of 0.6 kb fragment (Genebank ID K90052). Red highlights: vector sequence. Green highlight: SCAR primer region. Blue highlight: second reverse SCAR primer. Pink highlight: RAPD primer region.


### 3.4. Development of SCAR Marker

The candidate SCAR primer pairs were screened with three accessions of each ofC. wightii andC. myrrha which revealed that the primer Sc1Pm is highly specific forC. wightii and amplified 910 bp amplicon, while primer Sc1P had a similar banding pattern in all the samples. Primer Sc2P discriminated both theCommiphora species as it gave 491 bp amplicon forC. wightii, and 1200 bp forC. myrrha, while primer Sc2Pm gives 491 and 570 bp amplicon forC. wightii andC. myrrha, respectively (Figure 7).Figure 7
Screening of SCAR primers. (a) Lanes 1 to 2:C. myrrha and Lanes 3 to 4:C. wightii amplified by primers Sc1P; Lanes 5 to 6:C. myrrha andC. wightii, amplified by primers Sc2P. (b) Lanes 1 to 2,C. myrrha and Lanes 3 to 4,C. wightii amplified by primers Sc1P; Lanes 5 to 6,C. myrrha and Lanes 7 to 8,C. wightii, amplified by primers Sc2P. (c) Lanes 1 to 4,C. myrrha amplified by primers Sc1P, Sc1Pm, Sc2P, and Sc2Pm; Lanes 5 to 8,C. wightii amplified by primers Sc1P, Sc1Pm, Sc2P, and Sc2Pm.
(a)
(b)
(c)Based on the above results, primers Sc1Pm and Sc2P were authenticated through amplification of eight accession of each species, that is,C. wightii andC. myrrha (Figure 8). The similar results were observed during this screening as they were discriminated both the species ofCommiphora.Figure 8
Screening of SCAR primers. (a) Lanes 1 to 8, accessions ofC. wightii amplified by primers Sc1Pm. (b) Lanes 1 to 8, accessions ofC. myrrha amplified by primers Sc1Pm. (c) Lanes 1 to 8, accessions ofC. wightii and Lanes 9 to 16, accessions ofC. myrrha amplified by primers Sc2P. M = low range ruler (3000, 2500, 2000, 1500, 1000, 600, 300, 200, and 100 bp). L = 100 bp ladder (1000, 900, 800, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300, 200, and 100 bp).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.1. Identification of RAPD Primer and Amplicon

Out of 20 RAPD primers, 1 kb amplicon of OPD-02 and 0.6 kb amplicon of OPD-08 discriminate bothCommiphora species as it was present only inC. wightii accessions (Figure 1(a)). Due to specificity of these amplicons, they were cloned, sequenced, and used for SCAR marker development. These bands were elected from agarose gels and gel electrophoresis revealed that they were appropriate for cloning (Figure 1(b)).Figure 1
Selection and elution of desired amplicon. (a) PCR product of sampleCommiphora wightii on low melting agarose gel. Lanes 1 and 2 amplified by primers OPD-02 and OPD-08. (b) Eluted desired amplicon run on agarose gel. Lanes 1 and 2, fragment sizes 1 kb and 0.6 kb, respectively.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2. Cloning and Selection of Positive Clone

White colony of competent cells (E. coli) having T vector with 1 kb and 0.6 kb insert was undertaken for plasmid isolation and three selection criteria were performed for the conformation of positive clone. The screening for retardation checking reveals that 17 positive plasmids for 1 kb insert and 5 positive plasmids for 0.6 kb may have proper insert (Figure 2). These positive plasmids were digested with the restriction endonuclease (PvuII) for insert release. A total of 6 positive plasmids of 1 kb insert and 4 positive plasmids of 0.6 kb insert release their respective insert fragment (Figure 3). In the third stage of selection, 4 positive plasmids for 1 kb insert 3 positive plasmids for 0.6 kb insert were finalized for sequencing after amplify with M-13 primer (Figure 4).Figure 2
Retardation checking by plasmid run on agarose gel; Lanes 1 to 21: positive cloned plasmids 1 to 21, B: negative cloned plasmid isolated from blue colony.Figure 3
Insert release, digested plasmids by restriction endonuclease PvuII run on agarose gel, plasmid of Lanes 1, 2, 4, and 5 realised 1 kb fragment after digestion.Figure 4
Amplification of plasmid by vector primers (M-13). Lane 1, 2, 3 and 9 produced 1 kb fragment while lanes 4, 5, and 6 produced 0.6 kb fragment.


## 3.3. Sequencing andIn Silico Application

The clones were sequenced and 979 bp and 590 bp consensus sequences were formed for 1 kb insert 0.6 kb insert, respectively (Figures5 and 6). The BLAST search was performed for the obtained sequences and no significant homologous sequence was found in the NCBI database. This DNA sequences were deposited in the NCBI gene bank database with accession numbers K90051 and K90052. Two candidate SCAR primer pairs for each DNA sequences were designed, that is, primers Sc1P and Sc1Pm from 979 bp sequences and primer Sc2P and Sc1Pm from 590 bp sequences (Tables 1 and 2). These primers were deposited in the NCBI Prob database with accession number Pr031905450 to Pr031905453.Table 2
Sequence of SCAR markers designed from 0.6 kb amplicon.
Name of SCAR
Name of fragments
Sequence (5′-3′)
Total length
Temp.
Size (bp)
Sc2P
Sc2P (F)
GTACCCAATGTAGTAATATTCC
22 bases
60°C
491
Sc2P (R)
TAGTTAGTTTGATGACCATCACA
23 bases
62°C
Sc2Pm
Sc2P (F)
GTACCCAATGTAGTAATATTCC
22 bases
60°C
570
Sc2Pm (R)
GTGTGCCCCATTCAACCAAT
20 bases
60°CFigure 5
Consensus sequence (979 bp) of 1 kb fragment (Genebank ID K90051). Red highlights: vector sequence. Green highlight: SCAR primer region. Blue highlight: second reverse SCAR primer. Pink highlight: RAPD primer region.Figure 6
Consensus sequence (590 bp) of 0.6 kb fragment (Genebank ID K90052). Red highlights: vector sequence. Green highlight: SCAR primer region. Blue highlight: second reverse SCAR primer. Pink highlight: RAPD primer region.


## 3.4. Development of SCAR Marker

The candidate SCAR primer pairs were screened with three accessions of each ofC. wightii andC. myrrha which revealed that the primer Sc1Pm is highly specific forC. wightii and amplified 910 bp amplicon, while primer Sc1P had a similar banding pattern in all the samples. Primer Sc2P discriminated both theCommiphora species as it gave 491 bp amplicon forC. wightii, and 1200 bp forC. myrrha, while primer Sc2Pm gives 491 and 570 bp amplicon forC. wightii andC. myrrha, respectively (Figure 7).Figure 7
Screening of SCAR primers. (a) Lanes 1 to 2:C. myrrha and Lanes 3 to 4:C. wightii amplified by primers Sc1P; Lanes 5 to 6:C. myrrha andC. wightii, amplified by primers Sc2P. (b) Lanes 1 to 2,C. myrrha and Lanes 3 to 4,C. wightii amplified by primers Sc1P; Lanes 5 to 6,C. myrrha and Lanes 7 to 8,C. wightii, amplified by primers Sc2P. (c) Lanes 1 to 4,C. myrrha amplified by primers Sc1P, Sc1Pm, Sc2P, and Sc2Pm; Lanes 5 to 8,C. wightii amplified by primers Sc1P, Sc1Pm, Sc2P, and Sc2Pm.
(a)
(b)
(c)Based on the above results, primers Sc1Pm and Sc2P were authenticated through amplification of eight accession of each species, that is,C. wightii andC. myrrha (Figure 8). The similar results were observed during this screening as they were discriminated both the species ofCommiphora.Figure 8
Screening of SCAR primers. (a) Lanes 1 to 8, accessions ofC. wightii amplified by primers Sc1Pm. (b) Lanes 1 to 8, accessions ofC. myrrha amplified by primers Sc1Pm. (c) Lanes 1 to 8, accessions ofC. wightii and Lanes 9 to 16, accessions ofC. myrrha amplified by primers Sc2P. M = low range ruler (3000, 2500, 2000, 1500, 1000, 600, 300, 200, and 100 bp). L = 100 bp ladder (1000, 900, 800, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300, 200, and 100 bp).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 4. Discussion

Identification of plants at the species level traditionally is a feverish job and needs special care during identification. This work usually needs to be a specially trained expert, after that many human errors were observed. To overcome this problem, in the early 1990s many specific molecular identification technologies were popular which are more reliable [35, 36]. Nowadays molecular taxonomists are engaged in preparation of the nucleotide sequence of a short DNA fragment for all living species on earth, which is called DNA barcodes [37–39].Molecular markers allow the detection of specific DNA sequence differences between tests of individuals of an organism [40]. DNA markers are unlimited in number and are not affected by environmental factors and developmental stages of the plant [41]. The discovery of PCR technology changed the entire molecular biology and a single random oligonucleotide primer (10-bp long) was discovered in 1990 as a universal marker technology called RAPDs [42]. The main advantages of RAPD markers are the following: they are universal and cost-effective and for application of these markers they did not need any genetic information of the target organism and they can map almost completed genomic DNA of the target organism [43]. However, each method analyses different aspects of DNA sequence variation and different regions of the genome. RAPD and AFLP markers appear to frequently target repetitive regions of the genome.The presence of polysaccharides, polyphenols, and other secondary metabolites in the leaves ofCommiphora species creates complications in the DNA process. Haque et al. 2008 [44] and Samantaray et al. [45] used various methods and described the process for DNA isolation. Their isolated DNA showed good PCR amplification; therefore, it can further be used in molecular downstream applications. Molecular variations among accessions collected from different localities of Rajasthan and Gujarat were described by Suthar et al. [46]. Intraspecific variation inCommiphora wightii populations was described by Haque et al. [47] using Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) Sequences while Harish et al. [48] studied genetic variations on accessions collected from Indian Thar Desert using RAPD and ISSR markers. Molecular variations among different biotypes ofCommiphora wightii were done by Vyas and Joshi in 2015 [49] using RAPD markers. Genetic variability among theC. wightii germplasm collected from Rajasthan and Haryana was studied by Kulhari et al. [50]. Samantaray et al. [51] used sixty different random decamer primers and identified three primers which produced specific fragment in the female plant ofC. wightii but failed to do so from the male plant DNAs. Their finding was helpful for the breeding practice ofC. wightii and our SCAR markers may be useful for identification ofC. wightii at species level.The developed SCAR markers by us were used for identification ofC. wightii and discrimination amongC. wightii andC. myrrha. SCAR markers maybe are developed using sequence of RAPD fragments which are characterized by many advantages, including their specificity, low cost, ease, fast use, reproducibility, abundance, and being polymorphic in nature targeting specific regions of the genomes [52–54] employed with success in plant and animal species identification [30, 55–58].In this study, RAPD amplicons were selected for cloning, sequencing, and final development of SCAR markers. Specific characters of RAPD markers entice researchers and usually SCAR markers have been developed from RAPD amplicons [58–61]. Amplicon of other fingerprinting methods like AFLP [62–64] and ISSR (Inter Simple Sequence Repeat) [52] was also used to develop SCAR markers.Developed Sc1Pm marker in this study produced a 910 bp amplicon withC. wightii, while in other samples no amplification was observed. These results revealed that this SCAR marker might be used in identification and authentication ofC. wightii. Many reports are available in which SCAR markers have been used for authentication of medicinal plant species likePanax ginseng [65], bent-grass [66], Bamboo [67],Piper longum [68],Artemisia princeps andA. argyi [69],Phyllanthus emblica [70], strawberry [71]Jatropha curcas [72, 73],Ganoderma lucidum [74],Pueraria tuberosa [75],Dendrobium candidum [76],Sinapis arvensis [77],Cornus officinalis [78], andScrophularia ningpoensis [79]. Three SCAR markers ofPhyllanthus species were developed from three specific RAPD sequences that can identify and differentiate the morphologically similarPhyllanthus species [80].SCAR markers have been also developed for breeding programs of crops like Rice [81],Citrus tristeza [82],Brassica napus L. [83], Grapevine [84], Wheat [85], Buckwheat [86], Grape [87], Barley [88],Atractylodes japonica andA. macrocephala [89],Diplocarpon rosae [90],Puccinia coronata [91],Puccinia striiformis [92],Thinopyrum elongatum [93],Liriope andOphiopogon [94],Medicago sativa [95],Triticum turgidum [96], andMiscanthus sacchariflorus [97].Our marker Sc2P produced a prominent amplicon of 491 bp in theC. wightii, and 1.2 kb in theC. myrrha while other plant samples did not show amplification. The result revealed that this SCAR primer might be used for the discrimination amongC. wightii andC. myrrha. Only few reports are present with a single primer discrimination among two closely related species.



---

*Source: 1482796-2016-03-16.xml*