# Synthesis of Platinum Nanocrystals within Iodine Ions Mediated

Authors: Jiamao Li; Jingwei Hou; Yu Gong; Chengjian Xiao; Lei Yue; Linjie Zhao; Huan Ma; Heyi Wang; Shuming Peng; Chao Chen; Hongli Chen
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

A liquid-phase reducing method of synthesizing Pt nanocrystals was demonstrated, and dendrite-, cube-, and cuboctahedron-shaped Pt nanocrystals (NCs) with well-defined monomorphic were successfully synthesized through iodine ions mediated with the CTAB agent. When the KI concentration was increased to thirty times of K2PtCl4 at the nucleation stage, the high-quality Pt nanodendrites could be obtained. However, no matter how many KI were added at the growth age, only cube- and cuboctahedron-shaped Pt nanocrystals formed. The results of high-resolution TEM, EDX, and XRD indicated that the size and shape of Pt NCs could be turned by changing the concentration and time of KI. In the nucleation stage, it might be due to that some iodine ions adsorb on the surfaces of Pt NCs, which probably cause the rapid growth process resulting in the formation of Pt nanodendrites. In the growth stage, although high concentrations of I− ions could contribute to the shape control and generate bigger particles of Pt NCs, small Pt particles do not grow into dendrites. The insight into the role of I− ions in synthesis of Pt NCs reported here provided a viewpoint for clearly understanding the formation mechanism of anisotropic platinum nanostructures.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Recently, the remarkable progress of nanotechnology has attracted great attention [1–6], mainly due to the ability to finely control the shape and size of metal nanocrystals (NCs) in order to manipulate their electronic [7, 8], optical [9], and catalytic properties [10, 11]. Among metals, Pt has received remarkable interest primarily because it plays a crucial role in various catalytic reactions [12–14], such as hydrogenation production [15] and fuel oxidation in fuel cell technology [16–18]. The main drawback in the use of Pt is its scarceness, directly implying high costs. It is therefore essential to reduce the amount of Pt used in any application, in order to lower the overall cost. Some reports demonstrated that the catalytic performance of Pt NCs strongly depends on their size, shape, composition, and surface structure [12, 19]; for these reasons, Pt NCs have gained consideration in the development of high-activity Pt-based catalysts characterized by low amounts of Pt. So far, various approaches (physical, chemical, and biological methods) have been devoted to controlling the structure of Pt materials [20].Among the viable Pt NC synthesis methods, the solution-phase chemical reaction process is the more appropriate and cost-effective way to obtain Pt NCs with well-defined shapes [21, 22]; the most common is the polyol process [23, 24]. This method consists essentially in the reduction of a metal salt by a polyol and always occurs at elevated temperatures [25]. In this case, the polymeric stabilizer polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is used as an organic protective and reducing agent to synthesize shape- and size-controlled Pt NCs [25, 26]. Although PVP as a surface-regulating polymer has been widely used in various synthetic paths for Pt NCs, it still has some drawbacks, mainly because PVP tends to strongly interact with the Pt surface [27]. This interferes with the catalytic properties, because surface features significantly contribute to catalytic reactions. If some agents are absorbed on the surface of the catalytic particle, the probability of contact between the reactants is suppressed, causing the catalytic performance of metal NCs to diminish [28].Compared with the carbonyl group, alkylammonium ions (CTA+) have much weaker interactions with the Pt surface, because the tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide- (TTAB-) capped Pt NCs are characterized by higher catalytic activity than PVP-capped Pt NCs are [12, 28]. Because cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) is structurally related to TTAB, CTAB also can be considered to be an effective surface-stabilizing agent to regulate the shape of Pt NCs. Ullah et al. reported that 3D dendritic Pt nanoclusters could be synthesized at a pH of ~1.7 using CTAB, and the Pt nanodendrites showed excellent electrocatalytic activity for the reduction of O2 [29].In addition to polymeric stabilizers and surfactants, ionic impurities (Ag+ [23], Fe2+ [30] or Fe3+ [30, 31], NO3− [32], and Br− [33]) also contribute to the shape-controlled process in Pt NCs, implying that ionic impurities can be efficiently added to the solvent in order to realize the morphology control of Pt materials. As an example, Chen et al. [30] reported the synthesis of long single-crystalline platinum nanorods by adding Fe2+ or Fe3+ to the solvent in the polyol process. They found that Fe2+ or Fe3+ greatly reduced the reaction rate; moreover, the ionic impurities served as nucleation sites to induce the aggregation of Pt NCs into larger structures. Herricks and coworkers [32] reported the effect of NO3− on the growth of Pt NCs. They argued that NO2− could be formed by the reduction of NO3− in the early stages of the polyol process, slowing down the overall reduction rate of the polyol reaction, because they formed stable complexes with Pt2+ and Pt4+. The slower reduction rate causes an overgrowth of the corners of the tetrahedron and octahedron. The effect of Br− has been widely investigated in many Pt NC synthetic processes. It has been reported that by adding aqueous NaBH4 to a solution of K2PtCl4, KBr, and Na2H2P2O7 with slow dripping speed, Pt concave nanocubes enclosed by high-index facets can be obtained [33]. In this growth process, the selective overgrowth of Pt seeds at the edges and corners and the capping activity of Br− ions block the growth of the <100> axis. In addition to Br−, effects of I− ions on the growth of Pt NCs have also been investigated. For example, Yin et al. [25] reported the synthesis of monomorphic single-crystalline Pt nanoflowers by adding I− ions to the reaction solution. Moreover, the results obtained by Miyake and Miyabayashi [34] showed that time at which I− ions are added plays a key role in tuning the shape and size of Pt NCs. More recently, I− ions have gained great attention for their capability to directly shape Pt NCs, since they bind more strongly to Pt than any other halide ion, which results in a strongly decreased reduction rate of Pt atoms bound to I− ions [19].Although the effect of I− ions has been reported in many polyol processes, to the best of our knowledge, there are only few results concerning the extraordinary role of I− ions in the synthesis of Pt NCs with the CTAB capping agent [29, 35]. Most importantly, due to that dendrite-, cube-, and cuboctahedron-shaped Pt have exhibited great catalytic performance in various reactions [11, 29], therefore it is very meaningful to find an easy way to form them. Herein, we report a synthetic method in which CTAB is used as surface-stabilizing agent to prepare monodisperse Pt NCs. We propose a facile and simple synthesis of Pt nanodendrites, octahedra, and cubes, achieved by only changing the timing and the amount of I− ions. Moreover, the effect of I− ions on the shape of Pt NCs synthesized using the CTAB agent has been reported.


## 2. Experimental Procedures

### 2.1. Chemicals and Materials

Potassium tetrachloroplatinate(II) (K2PtCl4, 99.9%), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, 99%), potassium iodide (KI, 99%), and sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 98%) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., Ltd. All materials were used as received. Deionized water with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ·cm was used for all experiments as obtained from a Milli-Q system.


### 2.2. Synthesis of Pt NCs

Four synthetic routes of Pt NCs were exploited for all experiments. In route I, 0.05 mmol of K2PtCl4 and 5 mmol of CTAB were directly added to 20 mL of deionized water at room temperature. The mixture was stirred, heated, and refluxed at 50°C until the solution became clear. After that, 0.5 mL of a 3 M aqueous solution of NaBH4 at 0°C was added. Then, H2 flow in wild passed through the three-necked flask. The H2 flow and temperature were kept at the same state for 6 h. In addition, no other solution was added into the mixture during the whole process of route I. Synthetic routes (II, III, and IV) began with the preparation of 0.75 M CTAB (C1) added with a certain amount of KI. In particular, we prepared three different solutions characterized by the following mole ratios of KI and CTAB: 1 : 6 (M1), 1 : 2 (M2), and 1 : 1 (M3). Solutions C1, M1, M2, and M3 were maintained at 50°C in a water bath. Routes II, III, and IV were somewhat similar to route I, in that all of them had the same synthetic method in the early stage, except that a process of hot injection was employed at different times. “Hot injection” [3, 36] is the injection of hot reagents into an already hot solution. In route II, after the addition of ice-cold aqueous solution NaBH4 for 30 min, 2 mL each of C1, M1, M2, and M3 was injected into the flask. In route III, 2 mL each of C1, M1, M2, and M3 was added after NaBH4 was added for 120 min. In addition, when NaBH4 was added for 240 min, 2 mL each of C1, M1, M2, and M3 was added into the flask (route IV). For all routes, the H2 flow and temperature of 50°C were maintained for 6 h. The products of routes I, II, III, and IV were separated and centrifuged twice at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The precipitates were collected and redispersed in deionized water.


### 2.3. Material Characterization

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses were performed using a Carl Zeiss-Libra 200 microscope operated at 200 kV by drop casting the nanoparticle dispersions on carbon-coated copper grids and drying under ambient conditions. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on an X-ray instrument (X’Pert PRO) using CuKα (λ=0.15406nm) radiation at 40 kV and 40 mA, in a continuous scan mode.


## 2.1. Chemicals and Materials

Potassium tetrachloroplatinate(II) (K2PtCl4, 99.9%), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, 99%), potassium iodide (KI, 99%), and sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 98%) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., Ltd. All materials were used as received. Deionized water with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ·cm was used for all experiments as obtained from a Milli-Q system.


## 2.2. Synthesis of Pt NCs

Four synthetic routes of Pt NCs were exploited for all experiments. In route I, 0.05 mmol of K2PtCl4 and 5 mmol of CTAB were directly added to 20 mL of deionized water at room temperature. The mixture was stirred, heated, and refluxed at 50°C until the solution became clear. After that, 0.5 mL of a 3 M aqueous solution of NaBH4 at 0°C was added. Then, H2 flow in wild passed through the three-necked flask. The H2 flow and temperature were kept at the same state for 6 h. In addition, no other solution was added into the mixture during the whole process of route I. Synthetic routes (II, III, and IV) began with the preparation of 0.75 M CTAB (C1) added with a certain amount of KI. In particular, we prepared three different solutions characterized by the following mole ratios of KI and CTAB: 1 : 6 (M1), 1 : 2 (M2), and 1 : 1 (M3). Solutions C1, M1, M2, and M3 were maintained at 50°C in a water bath. Routes II, III, and IV were somewhat similar to route I, in that all of them had the same synthetic method in the early stage, except that a process of hot injection was employed at different times. “Hot injection” [3, 36] is the injection of hot reagents into an already hot solution. In route II, after the addition of ice-cold aqueous solution NaBH4 for 30 min, 2 mL each of C1, M1, M2, and M3 was injected into the flask. In route III, 2 mL each of C1, M1, M2, and M3 was added after NaBH4 was added for 120 min. In addition, when NaBH4 was added for 240 min, 2 mL each of C1, M1, M2, and M3 was added into the flask (route IV). For all routes, the H2 flow and temperature of 50°C were maintained for 6 h. The products of routes I, II, III, and IV were separated and centrifuged twice at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The precipitates were collected and redispersed in deionized water.


## 2.3. Material Characterization

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses were performed using a Carl Zeiss-Libra 200 microscope operated at 200 kV by drop casting the nanoparticle dispersions on carbon-coated copper grids and drying under ambient conditions. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on an X-ray instrument (X’Pert PRO) using CuKα (λ=0.15406nm) radiation at 40 kV and 40 mA, in a continuous scan mode.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Structural Characterization of Pt NCs

The addition of platinum salt to a mixture of water and CTAB caused the formation of a composite colloid containing both Pt2+ and CTA+, which exhibited the color yellow. With the help of mild heating (50°C), the reduction process of Pt2+ occurred very fast in the presence of a strong reducing agent (NaBH4). The color of solution immediately changed from yellow to dark brown, exhibiting the fast reduction of Pt2+ to Pt0 species. Figure 1 shows TEM images of the Pt cubic NCs [11] prepared by mixing 0.05 mmol of K2PtCl4, 5 mmol of CTAB, and 1.5 mmol of NaBH4 in deionized water at 50°C. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) shows low-magnification TEM images which clearly show that Pt NCs are well-defined and monomorphic (86% cubic, 12% tetrahedral, 2% irregular particles), with an average size of 11.55 ± 1.20 nm (Figure 1(d)). For the Pt cube (Figure 1(c)), the fringes exhibit a period of 0.193 nm, which is consistent with the (200) lattice spacing of face-centered cubic (fcc) Pt. Ahmadi et al. [21] and Petroski et al. [37] had reported a mechanism that most of the catalytically active {111} surface of Pt had been affected by a competition between the polymer capping and H2 reduction of the Pt2+ complex. In this process, we speculated that the rapid reduction of Pt2+ on the {111} surface by NaBH4 might lead to its disappearance and the formation of {100} faces due to the deposition of Pt atoms on it. Therefore, the Pt cubic NCs are synthesized by this method.Figure 1
TEM images of monomorphic Pt cubes (a) and (b) are TEM images of cubic Pt NCs, (c) HRTEM images of a single cubic Pt NC, and (d) size distribution of CTAB-stabilized cubic Pt NCs.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure2 shows TEM images of cuboctahedral Pt NCs [11, 23], which were prepared by route III, in which M3 was added into the mixture at 50°C, 120 min after the synthetic reaction started. Figure 2(a) shows a low-magnification TEM image of cuboctahedral Pt NCs, vertex to vertex, in which we found 78% cuboctahedra, 16% cubic, and 6% irregular-shaped Pt NCs. Figure 2(b) is a representative HRTEM image of a single cuboctahedral Pt NC. It clearly exhibits a separation angle of about 70° and a lattice fringe image of {111} planes with the interplanar distance of 0.226 nm. Figure 2(c) shows the particle size distribution of cuboctahedral Pt NCs, their average size being about 14.68 nm. The significantly greater average size of cuboctahedral Pt NCs as compared to cubic Pt NCs (Figure 2(c) compared to Figure 1(d)) is supposed to be a direct consequence of the effect of I− ions on the growth of Pt NCs.Figure 2
TEM images of cuboctahedral Pt NCs. (a) Low-magnification TEM image of cuboctahedral Pt NCs, (b) HRTEM images of a single cuboctahedral Pt NC, and (c) size distribution of CTAB-stabilized cuboctahedral Pt NCs.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figures3(a) and 3(b) show TEM images of Pt nanodendrites [38, 39] prepared by route II, in which the M3 solution at 50°C was added to the mixed solution, 30 min after the synthetic reaction started. Figure 3(a) shows a low-magnification TEM image, exhibiting that all Pt NCs have a dendrite-like structure with multibranched subunits. Figure 3(b) shows the HRTEM image of a single Pt nanodendrite, from which further insights into the structure of these nanoparticles can be inferred. Inside the individual Pt nanodendrites, many petals can be observed and are about 10 nm in width. The petals cause some interspaces, which may confirm that the Pt nanodendrites have a porous nanostructure. The observed lattice fringes in Figure 3(b) correspond to the {111} plane of Pt based on interplanar spacing measurements (0.230 nm). The data of HRTEM and the FT pattern (Figure 3(b), inset) for individual Pt nanodendrites indicate the single-crystalline nature of the highly branched Pt nanoarchitecture.Figure 3
Structural characterizations of Pt nanodendrites. (a) Low-magnification TEM image, (b) HRTEM image of a single Pt nanodendrite (inset image shows the Fourier transform (FT) pattern), (c) XRD patterns, and (d) EDX spectrum.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure3(c) shows the XRD spectra of Pt nanodendrites. The results of the XRD analysis indicate that the Pt nanodendrites are fcc cubic crystals, and its five peaks match the Pt standard pattern peaks of (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222). Figure 3(d) exhibits the results of EDX investigation of Pt nanodendrites, confirming that a large amount of elemental Pt is present in the nanodendrites. Moreover, peculiar signals characteristic of I− ions were detected, as shown in Figure 3(d). Although the final products from route II were washed many times with deionized water and ethanol, a small amount of I− ions was found, suggesting that some I− ions may have absorbed to the surfaces of the Pt nanodendrites. The above results suggest that the addition of I− ions leads to formation of different shapes of Pt NCs; the effect of I−ions will be discussed in detail below.


### 3.2. Effects of I− Ions on the Nucleation Stage

So far, few studies have explained the effect of I− ions on the growth of Pt NCs, in which CTAB is used as a surface-stabilizing agent. The addition of I− ions into a mixed solution (CTAB) causes the solution to become viscous (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)). The fresh mixture (0.05 mmol K2PtCl4 and 5 mmol CTAB) was heated at 50°C for about 5 min until the solution became clear [35], as shown in Figure 4(a). However, if 1.5 mmol of KI is injected into the mixture, the solution soon turns to a yellow viscous solution. The addition of an ice-cold aqueous solution of NaBH4 causes the initial mixture to become darker, but still clear, as shown in Figure 4(b). When 1.5 mmol KI solution is added to the latter, the clear solution becomes viscous (Figure 4(c)). At this point, the viscous mixture may limit the mass transfer of Pt sources, therefore interfering with the synthesis of shape-controlled Pt NCs. Figure 4(e) shows the initial mixture added with the M3 solution; in this case, the solution was still clear, suggesting that routes II, III, and IV might solve the problem of mass transfer.Figure 4
Reaction solutions of K2PtCl4, CTAB, and KI used in the synthesis of Pt NCs. (a) K2PtCl4 and CTAB mixture, (b) ice-cold NaBH4 solution added to (a), (c) KI solution added to (a), (d) KI solution added to (b), and (e) M3 solution added to (b).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)Figure5 shows TEM images of Pt NCs synthesized by route II, but with different KI concentrations. The results clearly indicate a significant variance of the morphology of Pt NCs as the KI concentration is gradually increased. Without any KI in the solution (2 mL, c1), most of the Pt structures are cubic NCs; however, since the morphology of Pt NCs is the same, the injection of additional CTAB caused the growth of many smaller cubic Pt NCs, as can be seen in Figure 5(a). At a very low concentration of KI (Pt:I=1:5), rod-, sphere-, and triangle-shaped NCs are observed (Figure 5(b)). As the concentration of KI is increased (Pt:I=1:15), the particles of Pt NCs grow bigger. Moreover, in this case, some particles tend to adhere to each other, and small Pt clusters appear (Figure 5(c)). At a Pt : I ratio of 1 : 30, sphere- and rod- structures disappear, and a large amount of Pt nanodendrites are observed (Figure 5(d)).Figure 5
TEM images of Pt NCs synthesized by route II with different KI concentrations: (a) 0 mmol, (b) 0.25 mmol, (c) 0.75 mmol, and (d) 1.5 mmol.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The formation process of Pt nanodendrites was investigated by a time sequential evolution experiment. The growth products of Pt NCs were collected at different stages and characterized by TEM. Thirty minutes after the addition of ice-cold NaBH4 to the mixtures, a large amount of small Pt NCs are formed, characterized by irregular shapes and a diameter of about 2–3 nm, as shown in Figure 6(a). Thirty minutes after the addition of M3, small Pt nanodendrites were observed, as shown in Figure 6(b). Upon increasing the reaction time, the particles of Pt nanodendrites grew into larger and denser nanoparticles, as shown in Figures 6(c) and 6(d).Figure 6
TEM images of Pt NCs collected at different reaction stages using route IV: (a) 30 min, (b) 60 min, (c) 240 min, and (d) 360 min
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The aforementioned results suggest that I− ions play an important role in the growth process of Pt nanodendrites. However, this growth process may be different with respect to the formation of platinum nanoflowers using the KI-mediated polyol process [25]. The formation of Pt nanodendrites might be from the rapid growth mechanism [39–41], in which several small Pt NCs were first formed as seeds and then rapidly grew into dendrites by the induced action of I− ions. The growth mechanism of Pt nanodendrites may be described like this. First, Pt2+ ions are adsorbed onto CTAB, then the complex ions are reduced by BH4− ions and form CTAB-encapsulated Pt0. Due to the strong reduction capacity of NaBH4, the CTAB-encapsulated Pt0 immediately increases to a high concentration. Moreover, a large number of reduced Pt atoms may also induce to attach to the seeds, and a number of Pt seeds are formed. After that, an excess amount of I− ions was introduced in the growth solution. Due to the binding strengths of halide ions to the Pt surface which increase in the order of Cl−, Br−, and I−, Pt atoms prefer I− ions to absorb on their surface and form CTAI-encapsulated Pt0. In addition, Pt clusters can form surface-ion pairs with Br− ions, and the stabilizing electrostatic interactions cause the cationic CTA+ head groups to surround the Br− layer. When the concentration of I− ions is very high, more I− ions absorb on the surface of Pt seeds and they may serve as nucleation sites to induce the aggregation of Pt NCs in the solvent. Therefore, fast anisotropic growth began and Pt nanodendrites form within a short time. Moreover, we observed that a low concentration of I− ions may not form Pt nanodendrites (Figure 5(b)).


### 3.3. Effect of I− Ions on the Growth Stage

Figure7 shows TEM images of Pt NCs synthesized by route III with different KI concentrations, indicating that the Pt NCs are well-defined and monomorphic even at different KI concentrations. In particular, Pt dendritic structures are not formed even when the concentration of I− ions is increased to a Pt : I ratio of 1 : 30. The increase in the KI concentration affects the particle size and shape of Pt NCs; the particles become larger and more cuboctahedral. A comparison of Figure 7(b) with Figure 7(d) shows that cuboctahedral Pt NCs are hardly formed in the former conditions, while large amounts of cuboctahedral Pt NCs appear when the latter synthetic conditions are used. Moreover, the average size of Pt NCs obtained with extra CTAB injection does not decrease (Figure 7(a) compared to Figure 1(a)); both of them are around 11.5 nm, but exhibit a narrow size distribution in comparison with the Pt NCs in Figure 5(a).Figure 7
TEM images of the Pt nanostructures synthesized by route III with different KI concentrations: (a) 0 mmol, (b) 0.25 mmol, (c) 0.75 mmol, and (d) 1.5 mmol.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure8 shows TEM images of Pt NCs synthesized by route IV with different KI concentrations. Route IV gives similar results to route III; again, Pt dendritic structures are not found in the products of this route, regardless of the concentration of I− ions. The increase in the concentration of I− ions does not affect the average size of Pt NCs, which is about 12 nm. The main difference with route III is that a high concentration of I− ions does not promote the formation of cuboctahedral Pt NCs; instead, more irregular Pt NCs are generated.Figure 8
TEM images of the Pt nanostructures synthesized by route IV with different KI concentrations: (a) 0 mM, (b) 0.25 mM, (c) 0.75 mM, and (d) 1.5 mM.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The above results suggest that I− ions play different roles in different stages of Pt NC growth. In the growth stage, high concentrations of I− ions could contribute to the shape control and generate bigger particles of Pt NCs; however, Pt seeds do not grow into dendrites. It may mean that the I− ions do not induce the aggregation of Pt NCs when the concentration of Pt0 or Pt seeds becomes very low in the growth solution.


## 3.1. Structural Characterization of Pt NCs

The addition of platinum salt to a mixture of water and CTAB caused the formation of a composite colloid containing both Pt2+ and CTA+, which exhibited the color yellow. With the help of mild heating (50°C), the reduction process of Pt2+ occurred very fast in the presence of a strong reducing agent (NaBH4). The color of solution immediately changed from yellow to dark brown, exhibiting the fast reduction of Pt2+ to Pt0 species. Figure 1 shows TEM images of the Pt cubic NCs [11] prepared by mixing 0.05 mmol of K2PtCl4, 5 mmol of CTAB, and 1.5 mmol of NaBH4 in deionized water at 50°C. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) shows low-magnification TEM images which clearly show that Pt NCs are well-defined and monomorphic (86% cubic, 12% tetrahedral, 2% irregular particles), with an average size of 11.55 ± 1.20 nm (Figure 1(d)). For the Pt cube (Figure 1(c)), the fringes exhibit a period of 0.193 nm, which is consistent with the (200) lattice spacing of face-centered cubic (fcc) Pt. Ahmadi et al. [21] and Petroski et al. [37] had reported a mechanism that most of the catalytically active {111} surface of Pt had been affected by a competition between the polymer capping and H2 reduction of the Pt2+ complex. In this process, we speculated that the rapid reduction of Pt2+ on the {111} surface by NaBH4 might lead to its disappearance and the formation of {100} faces due to the deposition of Pt atoms on it. Therefore, the Pt cubic NCs are synthesized by this method.Figure 1
TEM images of monomorphic Pt cubes (a) and (b) are TEM images of cubic Pt NCs, (c) HRTEM images of a single cubic Pt NC, and (d) size distribution of CTAB-stabilized cubic Pt NCs.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure2 shows TEM images of cuboctahedral Pt NCs [11, 23], which were prepared by route III, in which M3 was added into the mixture at 50°C, 120 min after the synthetic reaction started. Figure 2(a) shows a low-magnification TEM image of cuboctahedral Pt NCs, vertex to vertex, in which we found 78% cuboctahedra, 16% cubic, and 6% irregular-shaped Pt NCs. Figure 2(b) is a representative HRTEM image of a single cuboctahedral Pt NC. It clearly exhibits a separation angle of about 70° and a lattice fringe image of {111} planes with the interplanar distance of 0.226 nm. Figure 2(c) shows the particle size distribution of cuboctahedral Pt NCs, their average size being about 14.68 nm. The significantly greater average size of cuboctahedral Pt NCs as compared to cubic Pt NCs (Figure 2(c) compared to Figure 1(d)) is supposed to be a direct consequence of the effect of I− ions on the growth of Pt NCs.Figure 2
TEM images of cuboctahedral Pt NCs. (a) Low-magnification TEM image of cuboctahedral Pt NCs, (b) HRTEM images of a single cuboctahedral Pt NC, and (c) size distribution of CTAB-stabilized cuboctahedral Pt NCs.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figures3(a) and 3(b) show TEM images of Pt nanodendrites [38, 39] prepared by route II, in which the M3 solution at 50°C was added to the mixed solution, 30 min after the synthetic reaction started. Figure 3(a) shows a low-magnification TEM image, exhibiting that all Pt NCs have a dendrite-like structure with multibranched subunits. Figure 3(b) shows the HRTEM image of a single Pt nanodendrite, from which further insights into the structure of these nanoparticles can be inferred. Inside the individual Pt nanodendrites, many petals can be observed and are about 10 nm in width. The petals cause some interspaces, which may confirm that the Pt nanodendrites have a porous nanostructure. The observed lattice fringes in Figure 3(b) correspond to the {111} plane of Pt based on interplanar spacing measurements (0.230 nm). The data of HRTEM and the FT pattern (Figure 3(b), inset) for individual Pt nanodendrites indicate the single-crystalline nature of the highly branched Pt nanoarchitecture.Figure 3
Structural characterizations of Pt nanodendrites. (a) Low-magnification TEM image, (b) HRTEM image of a single Pt nanodendrite (inset image shows the Fourier transform (FT) pattern), (c) XRD patterns, and (d) EDX spectrum.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure3(c) shows the XRD spectra of Pt nanodendrites. The results of the XRD analysis indicate that the Pt nanodendrites are fcc cubic crystals, and its five peaks match the Pt standard pattern peaks of (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222). Figure 3(d) exhibits the results of EDX investigation of Pt nanodendrites, confirming that a large amount of elemental Pt is present in the nanodendrites. Moreover, peculiar signals characteristic of I− ions were detected, as shown in Figure 3(d). Although the final products from route II were washed many times with deionized water and ethanol, a small amount of I− ions was found, suggesting that some I− ions may have absorbed to the surfaces of the Pt nanodendrites. The above results suggest that the addition of I− ions leads to formation of different shapes of Pt NCs; the effect of I−ions will be discussed in detail below.


## 3.2. Effects of I− Ions on the Nucleation Stage

So far, few studies have explained the effect of I− ions on the growth of Pt NCs, in which CTAB is used as a surface-stabilizing agent. The addition of I− ions into a mixed solution (CTAB) causes the solution to become viscous (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)). The fresh mixture (0.05 mmol K2PtCl4 and 5 mmol CTAB) was heated at 50°C for about 5 min until the solution became clear [35], as shown in Figure 4(a). However, if 1.5 mmol of KI is injected into the mixture, the solution soon turns to a yellow viscous solution. The addition of an ice-cold aqueous solution of NaBH4 causes the initial mixture to become darker, but still clear, as shown in Figure 4(b). When 1.5 mmol KI solution is added to the latter, the clear solution becomes viscous (Figure 4(c)). At this point, the viscous mixture may limit the mass transfer of Pt sources, therefore interfering with the synthesis of shape-controlled Pt NCs. Figure 4(e) shows the initial mixture added with the M3 solution; in this case, the solution was still clear, suggesting that routes II, III, and IV might solve the problem of mass transfer.Figure 4
Reaction solutions of K2PtCl4, CTAB, and KI used in the synthesis of Pt NCs. (a) K2PtCl4 and CTAB mixture, (b) ice-cold NaBH4 solution added to (a), (c) KI solution added to (a), (d) KI solution added to (b), and (e) M3 solution added to (b).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)Figure5 shows TEM images of Pt NCs synthesized by route II, but with different KI concentrations. The results clearly indicate a significant variance of the morphology of Pt NCs as the KI concentration is gradually increased. Without any KI in the solution (2 mL, c1), most of the Pt structures are cubic NCs; however, since the morphology of Pt NCs is the same, the injection of additional CTAB caused the growth of many smaller cubic Pt NCs, as can be seen in Figure 5(a). At a very low concentration of KI (Pt:I=1:5), rod-, sphere-, and triangle-shaped NCs are observed (Figure 5(b)). As the concentration of KI is increased (Pt:I=1:15), the particles of Pt NCs grow bigger. Moreover, in this case, some particles tend to adhere to each other, and small Pt clusters appear (Figure 5(c)). At a Pt : I ratio of 1 : 30, sphere- and rod- structures disappear, and a large amount of Pt nanodendrites are observed (Figure 5(d)).Figure 5
TEM images of Pt NCs synthesized by route II with different KI concentrations: (a) 0 mmol, (b) 0.25 mmol, (c) 0.75 mmol, and (d) 1.5 mmol.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The formation process of Pt nanodendrites was investigated by a time sequential evolution experiment. The growth products of Pt NCs were collected at different stages and characterized by TEM. Thirty minutes after the addition of ice-cold NaBH4 to the mixtures, a large amount of small Pt NCs are formed, characterized by irregular shapes and a diameter of about 2–3 nm, as shown in Figure 6(a). Thirty minutes after the addition of M3, small Pt nanodendrites were observed, as shown in Figure 6(b). Upon increasing the reaction time, the particles of Pt nanodendrites grew into larger and denser nanoparticles, as shown in Figures 6(c) and 6(d).Figure 6
TEM images of Pt NCs collected at different reaction stages using route IV: (a) 30 min, (b) 60 min, (c) 240 min, and (d) 360 min
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The aforementioned results suggest that I− ions play an important role in the growth process of Pt nanodendrites. However, this growth process may be different with respect to the formation of platinum nanoflowers using the KI-mediated polyol process [25]. The formation of Pt nanodendrites might be from the rapid growth mechanism [39–41], in which several small Pt NCs were first formed as seeds and then rapidly grew into dendrites by the induced action of I− ions. The growth mechanism of Pt nanodendrites may be described like this. First, Pt2+ ions are adsorbed onto CTAB, then the complex ions are reduced by BH4− ions and form CTAB-encapsulated Pt0. Due to the strong reduction capacity of NaBH4, the CTAB-encapsulated Pt0 immediately increases to a high concentration. Moreover, a large number of reduced Pt atoms may also induce to attach to the seeds, and a number of Pt seeds are formed. After that, an excess amount of I− ions was introduced in the growth solution. Due to the binding strengths of halide ions to the Pt surface which increase in the order of Cl−, Br−, and I−, Pt atoms prefer I− ions to absorb on their surface and form CTAI-encapsulated Pt0. In addition, Pt clusters can form surface-ion pairs with Br− ions, and the stabilizing electrostatic interactions cause the cationic CTA+ head groups to surround the Br− layer. When the concentration of I− ions is very high, more I− ions absorb on the surface of Pt seeds and they may serve as nucleation sites to induce the aggregation of Pt NCs in the solvent. Therefore, fast anisotropic growth began and Pt nanodendrites form within a short time. Moreover, we observed that a low concentration of I− ions may not form Pt nanodendrites (Figure 5(b)).


## 3.3. Effect of I− Ions on the Growth Stage

Figure7 shows TEM images of Pt NCs synthesized by route III with different KI concentrations, indicating that the Pt NCs are well-defined and monomorphic even at different KI concentrations. In particular, Pt dendritic structures are not formed even when the concentration of I− ions is increased to a Pt : I ratio of 1 : 30. The increase in the KI concentration affects the particle size and shape of Pt NCs; the particles become larger and more cuboctahedral. A comparison of Figure 7(b) with Figure 7(d) shows that cuboctahedral Pt NCs are hardly formed in the former conditions, while large amounts of cuboctahedral Pt NCs appear when the latter synthetic conditions are used. Moreover, the average size of Pt NCs obtained with extra CTAB injection does not decrease (Figure 7(a) compared to Figure 1(a)); both of them are around 11.5 nm, but exhibit a narrow size distribution in comparison with the Pt NCs in Figure 5(a).Figure 7
TEM images of the Pt nanostructures synthesized by route III with different KI concentrations: (a) 0 mmol, (b) 0.25 mmol, (c) 0.75 mmol, and (d) 1.5 mmol.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure8 shows TEM images of Pt NCs synthesized by route IV with different KI concentrations. Route IV gives similar results to route III; again, Pt dendritic structures are not found in the products of this route, regardless of the concentration of I− ions. The increase in the concentration of I− ions does not affect the average size of Pt NCs, which is about 12 nm. The main difference with route III is that a high concentration of I− ions does not promote the formation of cuboctahedral Pt NCs; instead, more irregular Pt NCs are generated.Figure 8
TEM images of the Pt nanostructures synthesized by route IV with different KI concentrations: (a) 0 mM, (b) 0.25 mM, (c) 0.75 mM, and (d) 1.5 mM.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The above results suggest that I− ions play different roles in different stages of Pt NC growth. In the growth stage, high concentrations of I− ions could contribute to the shape control and generate bigger particles of Pt NCs; however, Pt seeds do not grow into dendrites. It may mean that the I− ions do not induce the aggregation of Pt NCs when the concentration of Pt0 or Pt seeds becomes very low in the growth solution.


## 4. Conclusions

Pt nanodendrites were successfully synthesized using the iodine ion process mediated with CTAB. The key to the synthesis of Pt nanodendrites was the addition of a large amount of I− ions to K2PtCl4 and the CTAB solution during the nucleation stage. We observed that a small portion of I− ions bound to the surfaces of Pt nanodendrites and thus may cause a rapid growth process. In addition, when the KI were added at the growth stage, the cube- and cuboctahedron-shaped Pt NCs had also been obtained. This work can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of the iodine ion synthetic process mediated by CTAB and provide a way toward a more rational design of the synthesis of morphologically controlled metal nanomaterials for their advanced functional applications.



---

*Source: 1465760-2018-08-26.xml*