# The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio is Associated with the Requirement and the Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Study

Authors: Lijuan Yang; Chang Gao; Ying He; Xiaowan Wang; Ling Yang; Shiqi Guo; Jiahao Chen; Siyu He; Yuanxiao Sun; Ye Gao; Qiang Guo
Journal: Canadian Respiratory Journal
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Background. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high in-hospital mortality and most ARDS patients require ventilatory support. Applying appropriate ventilation strategies based on patients’ individual situations has a direct impact upon patients’ outcome. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to predict the early requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between baseline NLR and IMV in ARDS. Methods. A retrospective study was performed on patients who were diagnosed with ARDS using the Berlin definition and admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from 2017 to 2022. Clinical data within 24 h after the ARDS diagnosis were collected from the medical record system. Based on the ventilation strategies during hospitalization, patients were divided into three groups and their clinical characteristics were compared. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis was used to screen the independent risk factors for IMV. STROBE checklist was used for this manuscript. Results. 520 ARDS patients were included and the median NLR value in IMV group was significantly higher than that of other groups (P<0.001). NLR was significantly associated with the requirement of IMV in ARDS patients (OR, 1.042; 95% CI, 1.025–1.060; P<0.001), other independent risk factors included PaO2/FiO2, Hb, lactate, and use of vasoactive drugs (all P<0.05). Moreover, we found that the duration of IMV was longer in patients with high NLR (8[IQR, 3–13], 10[IQR, 6–16], respectively, P=0.025). Conclusions. Our results revealed that high baseline NLR level was significantly correlated with an increased risk of IMV in patients with ARDS. Furthermore, higher NLR was associated with prolonged duration of IMV in patients with ARDS.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a sudden and fatal illness that makes it difficult to get enough oxygen [1], with a mortality rate ranging from 35% to 40% [2, 3]. ARDS severity is classified by the oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), as severe (PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤100 mmHg), moderate (PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 101–200 mmHg), and mild (PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 201–300 mmHg), with mortality being increased with greater ARDS severity [4, 5]. Most ARDS patients require noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) to decrease work of breathing and restore gas exchange [6]. Ventilator management differed among the ARDS severity groups. NIV can be implemented outside the intensive care units (ICU) and appear to be effective and safe in mild-to-moderate hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 >150 mmHg), but they can yield delayed intubation with increased mortality in a significant proportion of moderate-to-severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 ≤150 mmHg). IMV is commonly used in moderate-to-severe individuals [7]. However, patients receiving IMV often have an increased length of hospital stay and mortality [8]. Therefore, strict physiological monitoring and appropriate ventilation strategies based on patients’ individual situations are extremely necessary.The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a novel marker of systemic inflammatory response and is defined as the absolute neutrophil count divided by the absolute lymphocyte count, with normal NLR values ranging from 0.78 to 3.53 in an adult, nongeriatric population in good health [9]. Increased NLR has been proven to be valuable in the prognosis of several types of cancers [10], inflammatory diseases [11], and cardiovascular diseases [12]. In addition, an interim analysis of an ongoing prospective study showed that NLR at admission can predict the early requirement of IMV in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [13]. To our knowledge, the relationship between NLR and ventilatory support in ARDS patients has not yet been evaluated. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to assess the performance of baseline NLR for ARDS patients and reveal the relationship between NLR level and the requirement and duration of IMV during hospitalization.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. Study Design and Patient Population

This retrospective cohort study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Jiangsu, China). Between January 2017 and May 2022, 2617 patients were diagnosed with respiratory failure in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The medical records of all patients were reviewed by two attending physicians in the Department of Critical Care Medicine and then 632 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria based on the Berlin definition [5] of ARDS (new or worsening respiratory symptoms began within 1 week of a known clinical insult, bilateral opacities on chest X-ray, PaO2/FiO2 less than 300 mmHg with positive end-expiratory pressure being more than 5 cmH2O, no clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension, and no other explanation for these findings). We excluded individuals who were with history of blood system diseases, were less than 18 years old, died within 24 h of admission, received immunosuppressant treatments, and were with incomplete medical records. Ultimately, 112 patients were excluded and 520 patients with ARDS (193 patients with IMV, which included 26 patients who required IMV after a failed trial of NIV; 142 patients with NIV; 185 patients without ventilatory support) were enrolled in our study (Figure 1).Figure 1
Research flowchart. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; NIV, noninvasive ventilation; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation.


### 2.2. Data Extraction

Demographic characteristics (age, gender), past medical history, the risk factors of ARDS, types of infection, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, clinical interventions, and laboratory test results (including PaO2/FiO2, white blood cell counts, neutrophil counts, monocyte counts, lymphocyte counts, hemoglobin, red cell distribution width, hematocrit, platelets, lactate, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen) for participants were collected. All parameters were first measured within 24 hours after the ARDS diagnosis, and all patients were followed up for 28 days. Ventilation strategies (tracheostomy, endotracheal intubation, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, and high-flow nasal cannula) used during hospitalization and clinical outcomes (duration of ventilation, hospital length of stay, and 28-day mortality) were recorded retrospectively. The indications for mechanical ventilation [14, 15] after diagnosis of ARDS were condition that continued to deteriorate despite aggressive treatments, abnormal respiration, and arterial oxygen tension (Pa02) less than 50 mmHg. Indications may vary according to the acuity of onset of respiratory failure and the underlying disease pathology. MLR and NLR were calculated. Steroid therapy was defined as at least a dose (≥0.5 mg/kg) of methylprednisolone [16, 17]. Vasoactive drugs included epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, dopamine, and phenylephrine.


### 2.3. Statistical Analysis

SPSS software version 24.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) and MedCalc software (version 19.0.4) were used for processing data. Differences in continuous variables were analysed using Student’st-test or Mann–Whitney U test based on variable distribution, presented as mean ± standard deviation or medians (quartiles). Meanwhile, the differences between categorical variables were compared using Pearson x2 test or Fisher’s exact method and described as frequency and percentage. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were generated to identify the independent influence factors for requirement of IMV. Multivariate logistic regression analysis used the forward logistic regression method (entering a variable if P values are less than 0.05, removing a variable if P values are more than 0.10). Binary logistic regression analysis was used to combine covariates. In addition, prognostic values of baseline model and the combination of baseline model and NLR were calculated by operating characteristic curve (ROC) and generated area under the curve (AUC) for different models then compared them using DeLong’s test. Values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. STROBE checklist for observational studies was used for this manuscript (Table S1).


## 2.1. Study Design and Patient Population

This retrospective cohort study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Jiangsu, China). Between January 2017 and May 2022, 2617 patients were diagnosed with respiratory failure in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The medical records of all patients were reviewed by two attending physicians in the Department of Critical Care Medicine and then 632 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria based on the Berlin definition [5] of ARDS (new or worsening respiratory symptoms began within 1 week of a known clinical insult, bilateral opacities on chest X-ray, PaO2/FiO2 less than 300 mmHg with positive end-expiratory pressure being more than 5 cmH2O, no clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension, and no other explanation for these findings). We excluded individuals who were with history of blood system diseases, were less than 18 years old, died within 24 h of admission, received immunosuppressant treatments, and were with incomplete medical records. Ultimately, 112 patients were excluded and 520 patients with ARDS (193 patients with IMV, which included 26 patients who required IMV after a failed trial of NIV; 142 patients with NIV; 185 patients without ventilatory support) were enrolled in our study (Figure 1).Figure 1
Research flowchart. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; NIV, noninvasive ventilation; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation.


## 2.2. Data Extraction

Demographic characteristics (age, gender), past medical history, the risk factors of ARDS, types of infection, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, clinical interventions, and laboratory test results (including PaO2/FiO2, white blood cell counts, neutrophil counts, monocyte counts, lymphocyte counts, hemoglobin, red cell distribution width, hematocrit, platelets, lactate, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen) for participants were collected. All parameters were first measured within 24 hours after the ARDS diagnosis, and all patients were followed up for 28 days. Ventilation strategies (tracheostomy, endotracheal intubation, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, and high-flow nasal cannula) used during hospitalization and clinical outcomes (duration of ventilation, hospital length of stay, and 28-day mortality) were recorded retrospectively. The indications for mechanical ventilation [14, 15] after diagnosis of ARDS were condition that continued to deteriorate despite aggressive treatments, abnormal respiration, and arterial oxygen tension (Pa02) less than 50 mmHg. Indications may vary according to the acuity of onset of respiratory failure and the underlying disease pathology. MLR and NLR were calculated. Steroid therapy was defined as at least a dose (≥0.5 mg/kg) of methylprednisolone [16, 17]. Vasoactive drugs included epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, dopamine, and phenylephrine.


## 2.3. Statistical Analysis

SPSS software version 24.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) and MedCalc software (version 19.0.4) were used for processing data. Differences in continuous variables were analysed using Student’st-test or Mann–Whitney U test based on variable distribution, presented as mean ± standard deviation or medians (quartiles). Meanwhile, the differences between categorical variables were compared using Pearson x2 test or Fisher’s exact method and described as frequency and percentage. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were generated to identify the independent influence factors for requirement of IMV. Multivariate logistic regression analysis used the forward logistic regression method (entering a variable if P values are less than 0.05, removing a variable if P values are more than 0.10). Binary logistic regression analysis was used to combine covariates. In addition, prognostic values of baseline model and the combination of baseline model and NLR were calculated by operating characteristic curve (ROC) and generated area under the curve (AUC) for different models then compared them using DeLong’s test. Values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. STROBE checklist for observational studies was used for this manuscript (Table S1).


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients

A total of 520 ARDS patients were included in our study and were divided into three groups according to the ventilation strategies used during hospitalization (Figure1). The baseline characteristics of the non-MV and IMV groups are displayed in Table 1. Compared with patients without MV, patients with IMV were more likely to be male (P=0.012), had lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio, higher NLR values, and higher SOFA scores (both P<0.001). Laboratory parameters (hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, lactate, and blood urea nitrogen) had significant statistical differences among different groups. Within the first 24 h after ARDS diagnosis, the IMV group was more likely to use steroid (59.6% vs. 49.2%; P=0.042) and vasoactive drugs (45.1% vs. 14.6%; P<0.001). Furthermore, categories of ARDS, 28-day mortality, and hospital length of stay in the two groups were significantly different (P<0.001, P=0.001, P=0.002, respectively).Table 1
Comparisons of baseline characteristics between the nonmechanical ventilation group and the invasive mechanical ventilation group.
VariablesNon-MV group (n = 185)IMV group (n = 193)P valueAge (years)66 (52–76)67 (51–75)0.929Male,n (%)119 (64.3)147 (76.2)0.012Smoking,n (%)54 (29.2)48 (24.9)0.344Alcohol abuse,n (%)29 (15.7)39 (20.2)0.252Hypertension,n (%)47 (25.4)57 (29.5)0.369Diabetes mellitus,n (%)49 (26.5)44 (22.8)0.405Coronary artery disease,n (%)22 (11.9)20 (10.4)0.636Risk factor,n (%)0.646Pneumonia122 (65.9)130 (67.4)Aspiration7 (3.8)12 (6.2)Sepsis15 (8.1)13 (6.7)Others41 (22.2)38 (19.7)Types of infection,n (%)0.665Bacteria151 (81.6)154 (79.8)Virus11 (5.9)8 (4.1)Fungus6 (3.3)9 (4.7)Unknown17 (9.2)22 (11.4)PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)200 (160–236.5)126 (82.94–184.62)<0.001Categories of ARDS,n (%)<0.001Mild87 (47.0)36 (18.7)Moderate79 (42.7)81 (41.9)Severe19 (10.3)76 (39.4)WBC, 109/L9.22 (6–11.46)9.8 (7.02–11.84)0.249Hb, g/L118.48 ± 25.49106.29 ± 25.81<0.001RDW, %13.7 (13–15.1)13.9 (13.1–15)0.519Hematocrit0.35 ± 0.080.33 ± 0.090.010Platelets, 109/L178.37 (127–261)161.5 (93–229)0.013Lactate, mmol/L2 (1.25–3.37)2.54 (1.4–4.46)0.017Alb, g/L31.58 ± 6.2530.35 ± 7.020.073MLR0.51 (0.32–0.80)0.59 (0.30–0.93)0.147NLR10.36 (4.99–15.88)14.95 (7.73–27.99)<0.001AST39.45 (21.25–107.53)47.6 (24.68–107.75)0.204ALT38.45 (20–103.38)45.7 (20.08–107.4)0.566Cr,μmol/L103.07 (54.9–183)84.5 (56.35–174.25)0.962BUN, mmol/L9.1 (5.36–15.73)11 (7–17.05)0.011APACHE II score12 (8–15)13 (9–17)0.078SOFA score7 (5–8)8 (6–10)<0.001Intervention (1st24 h), n (%)Steroida91 (49.2)115 (59.6)0.042Alimentotherapy92 (49.7)112 (58.0)0.106Vasoactive drugsb27 (14.6)87 (45.1)<0.001CRRT20 (10.8)34 (17.6)0.059Outcomes28-day mortality,n (%)40 (21.6)73 (37.8)0.001Hospital length of stay14 (9–20)18 (11–26)0.002aSteroid therapy was defined as at least a dose (≥0.5 mg/kg) of methylprednisolone. bVasoactive drugs include epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, dopamine, and phenylephrine. MV, mechanical ventilation; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; RDW, red cell distribution width; Alb, albumin; MLR, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; Cr, creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; APACHE II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy.The characteristics of the NIV and IMV groups are summarized in Table2. Patients in the IMV group had higher NLR values (P=0.001), lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio (126, IQR: 82.94–184.62 vs 139, IQR:100–193.68, P=0.040), higher severity of ARDS, and higher SOFA scores (8, IQR: 6–10 vs 7, IQR: 6–9, P=0.022) and were more likely to use vasoactive drugs (45.1% vs. 28.2%; P=0.002) within 24 h after the ARDS diagnosis compared with NIV group. Furthermore, patients with IMV had higher 28-day mortality and longer hospital length of stay (P=0.023, P=0.013, respectively). Details about baseline characteristics of the non-IMV and IMV groups are shown in Supplementary Material Table S2.Table 2
Comparisons of baseline characteristics between the noninvasive ventilation group and the invasive mechanical ventilation group.
VariablesNIV group (n = 142)IMV group (n = 193)P valueAge (years)68 (60–77)67 (51–75)0.134Male,n (%)97 (68.3)147 (76.2)0.110Smoking,n (%)39 (27.5)48 (24.9)0.593Alcohol abuse,n (%)31 (21.8)39 (20.2)0.718Hypertension,n (%)39 (27.5)57 (29.5)0.679Diabetes mellitus,n (%)34 (23.9)44 (22.8)0.806Coronary artery disease,n (%)17 (12.0)20 (10.4)0.642Risk factor,n (%)0.008Pneumonia118 (83.1)130 (67.4)Aspiration4 (2.8)12 (6.2)Sepsis8 (5.6)13 (6.7)Others12 (8.5)38 (19.7)Types of infection,n (%)0.795Bacteria115 (80.9)154 (79.8)Virus4 (2.9)8 (4.1)Fungus9 (6.3)9 (4.7)Unknown14 (9.9)22 (11.4)PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)139 (100–193.68)126 (82.94–184.62)0.040Categories of ARDS,n (%)0.036Mild30 (21.1)36 (18.7)Moderate75 (52.8)81 (41.9)Severe37 (26.1)76 (39.4)WBC, 109/L9.62 (7.73–11.44)9.8 (7.02–11.84)0.549Hb, g/L106.58 ± 23.78106.29 ± 25.810.919RDW, %13.8 (12.9–15.3)13.9 (13.1–15)0.786Hematocrit0.33 ± 0.080.33 ± 0.090.535Platelets, 109/L155.5 (123.12–228)161.5 (93–229)0.413Lactate, mmol/L2.31 (1.4–3.46)2.54 (1.4–4.46)0.293Alb, g/L32.02 ± 6.4230.35 ± 7.020.026MLR0.63 (0.33–1.08)0.59 (0.30–0.93)0.229NLR10.66 (6.56–17.80)14.95 (7.73–27.99)0.001AST52 (25.3–120)47.6 (24.68–107.75)0.525ALT34.7 (17.8–84.5)45.7 (20.08–107.4)0.220Cr,μmol/L105.15 (62.32–186.12)84.5 (56.35–174.25)0.423BUN, mmol/L11.25 (7.07–17.76)11 (7–17.05)0.872APACHE II score12 (9–15)13 (9–17)0.112SOFA score7 (6–9)8 (6–10)0.022Intervention (1st24 h), n (%)Steroida82 (57.7)115 (59.6)0.735Alimentotherapy73 (51.4)112 (58.0)0.228Vasoactive drugsb40 (28.2)87 (45.1)0.002CRRT21 (14.8)34 (17.6)0.490Outcomes28-day mortality,n (%)37 (26.1)73 (37.8)0.023Hospital length of stay14 (9–22)18 (11–26)0.013aSteroid therapy was defined as at least a dose (≥0.5 mg/kg) of methylprednisolone. bVasoactive drugs include epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, dopamine, and phenylephrine. NIV, noninvasive ventilation; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; RDW, red cell distribution width; Alb, albumin; MLR, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; Cr, creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; APACHE II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy.


### 3.2. Relationship between Baseline NLR and High Risk of IMV

Logistic regression analysis was carried out to screen the independent risk factors for requirement of IMV in ARDS patients. Covariates withP value less than 0.1 in univariate logistic regression analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. In the multivariate logistic regression model, the PaO2/FiO2 (OR, 0.993; 95%CI, 0.989–0.996; P<0.001), the Hb (OR, 0.989; 95%CI, 0.981–0.998; P=0.012), the NLR (OR, 1.042; 95%CI, 1.025–1.060; P<0.001), the lactate (OR, 1.160; 95%CI, 1.063–1.265; P=0.001), and the vasoactive drugs (OR, 2.504; 95% CI, 1.601–3.917; P<0.001) were covariates statistically associated with the requirement of IMV in ARDS patients (Table S3, Table 3).Table 3
Influence factors for requirement of IMV in ARDS patients by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
VariablesUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysisOR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P valueMale,n (%)1.642 (1.098–2.456)0.016PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)0.991 (0.988–0.994)<0.0010.993 (0.989–0.996)<0.001Hb, g/L0.989 (0.982–0.996)0.0030.989 (0.981–0.998)0.012Hematocrit0.106 (0.012–0.960)0.046Platelets, 109/L0.998 (0.996–1.000)0.061Lactate, mmol/L1.166 (1.075–1.263)<0.0011.160 (1.063–1.265)0.001Alb, g/L0.968 (0.942–0.994)0.018NLR1.046 (1.031–1.062)<0.0011.042 (1.025–1.060)<0.001APACHE II score1.043 (1.009–1.078)0.012SOFA score1.137 (1.073–1.205)<0.001Alimentotherapy1.358 (0.948–1.943)0.095Vasoactive drugsb3.185 (2.155–4.707)<0.0012.504 (1.601–3.917)<0.001bVasoactive drugs include epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, dopamine, and phenylephrine. IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; Hb, hemoglobin; Alb, albumin; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; APACHE II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.


### 3.3. Incremental Prognostic Value of NLR

We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to explore the incremental prognostic value of NLR for ARDS patients (Figure2). The baseline model included variables that were significant in multivariate logistic regression analysis, such as PaO2/FiO2, Hb, lactate, and vasoactive drugs. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as 0.738 (95% CI: 0.696–0.777; P<0.001) in the baseline model. With NLR in combination with baseline model, the AUC was calculated as 0.768 (95% CI: 0.728–0.805; P<0.001). Compared with baseline model, the inclusion of NLR resulted in a significant increase in the AUC (P=0.0097, Table 4).Figure 2
ROC curves for the baseline model and baseline model + NLR for predicting the requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS. ROC, receiver operating characteristics; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; baseline model + NLR: the integration parameters of baseline model and NLR; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome.Table 4
The value of indicators in predicting the requirement of IMV in patients with ARDS.
ParametersAUC95%CIP valueBaseline modela0.7380.696–0.777RF+NLR0.7680.728–0.8050.0097aThe baseline model includes variables that are significant in multivariate logistic regression analysis, including male, PaO2/FiO2, Hb, lactate, and vasoactive drugs. IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; RF, reference.


### 3.4. Baseline Characteristics of IMV Group According to the Different Level of NLR

We divided all the IMV group (n = 193) into two subgroups according to the median value of NLR (=14.95), including low NLR group (NLR ≤14.95, n = 97) and high NLR group (NLR >14.95, n = 96). As shown in Table 5, the duration of IMV was longer in patients with high NLR compared with low NLR group (10[IQR, 6–16], 8[IQR, 3–13], respectively, P=0.025). Patients with high NLR had lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio and lower Alb levels (P = 0.024, P<0.001, respectively). Furthermore, MLR, NLR, age, and 28-day mortality were significantly elevated in high NLR patients compared with low NLR patients. Besides, categories of ARDS in the two subgroups were significantly different (P=0.005).Table 5
Baseline characteristics of IMV group in different NLR levels.
VariablesLow NLR (NLR ≤14.95,n = 97)High NLR (NLR >14.95,n = 96)P valueAge (years)63 (47–73)71 (56–77)0.002Male,n (%)77 (79.4)70 (72.9)0.292Smoking,n (%)29 (29.9)19 (19.8)0.104Alcohol abuse,n (%)26 (26.8)13 (13.5)0.022Hypertension,n (%)25 (25.8)32 (33.3)0.250Diabetes mellitus,n (%)17 (17.5)27 (28.1)0.079Coronary artery disease,n (%)13 (13.4)7 (7.3)0.164Risk factor,n (%)0.414Pneumonia60 (61.9)70 (72.9)Aspiration7 (7.2)5 (5.2)Sepsis7 (7.2)6 (6.3)Others23 (23.7)15 (15.6)Types of infection,n (%)0.432Bacteria82 (84.5)72 (75.0)Virus3 (3.1)5 (5.2)Fungus3 (3.1)6 (6.3)Unknown9 (9.3)13 (13.5)PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)140 (89.17–219.84)115 (81.53–166.83)0.024Categories of ARDS,n (%)0.005Mild27 (27.8)9 (9.4)Moderate36 (37.1)45 (46.9)Severe34 (35.1)42 (43.8)WBC, 109/L9.69 (5.95–12.13)9.57 (6.95–11.62)0.947Hb, g/L104.43 ± 27.59108.18 ± 23.880.313RDW, %14.05 (13–15.18)13.7 (13.2–14.8)0.551Hematocrit0.33 ± 0.090.33 ± 0.080.862Platelets, 109/L168.43 ± 105.87172.20 ± 99.180.799Lactate, mmol/L2.39 (1.28–4.90)2.61 (1.5–4.22)0.864Alb, g/L33 (27.5–36.77)28.4 (23.2–32.4)<0.001MLR0.39 (0.25–0.64)0.79 (0.48–1.37)<0.001NLR7.79 (3.78–10.80)27.99 (20.15–47.36)<0.001AST46 (23.4–138)48 (27.2–86.6)0.877ALT43.6 (20–107.2)49 (20.4–108)0.984Cr,μmol/L80.3 (52–164.28)88.85 (60.55–183.91)0.217BUN, mmol/L10.11 (6.71–16.02)11.83 (6.96–19.28)0.158APACHE II score12 (8–16)14 (9–18)0.283SOFA score8 (6–10)8 (6–10)0.885Interventions,n (%)Steroida57 (58.8)58 (60.4)0.815Alimentotherapy52 (53.6)60 (62.5)0.211Vasoactive drugsb41 (42.3)46 (47.9)0.430CRRT16 (16.5)18 (18.8)0.68128-day mortality,n (%)29 (29.9)44 (45.8)0.022Duration of ventilation8 (3–13)10 (6–16)0.025Hospital length of stay16 (8–25)18 (12–26)0.173aSteroid therapy was defined as at least a dose (≥0.5 mg/kg) of methylprednisolone. bVasoactive drugs include epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, dopamine, and phenylephrine. IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; RDW, red cell distribution width; Alb, albumin; MLR, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; Cr, creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; APACHE II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy.


## 3.1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients

A total of 520 ARDS patients were included in our study and were divided into three groups according to the ventilation strategies used during hospitalization (Figure1). The baseline characteristics of the non-MV and IMV groups are displayed in Table 1. Compared with patients without MV, patients with IMV were more likely to be male (P=0.012), had lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio, higher NLR values, and higher SOFA scores (both P<0.001). Laboratory parameters (hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, lactate, and blood urea nitrogen) had significant statistical differences among different groups. Within the first 24 h after ARDS diagnosis, the IMV group was more likely to use steroid (59.6% vs. 49.2%; P=0.042) and vasoactive drugs (45.1% vs. 14.6%; P<0.001). Furthermore, categories of ARDS, 28-day mortality, and hospital length of stay in the two groups were significantly different (P<0.001, P=0.001, P=0.002, respectively).Table 1
Comparisons of baseline characteristics between the nonmechanical ventilation group and the invasive mechanical ventilation group.
VariablesNon-MV group (n = 185)IMV group (n = 193)P valueAge (years)66 (52–76)67 (51–75)0.929Male,n (%)119 (64.3)147 (76.2)0.012Smoking,n (%)54 (29.2)48 (24.9)0.344Alcohol abuse,n (%)29 (15.7)39 (20.2)0.252Hypertension,n (%)47 (25.4)57 (29.5)0.369Diabetes mellitus,n (%)49 (26.5)44 (22.8)0.405Coronary artery disease,n (%)22 (11.9)20 (10.4)0.636Risk factor,n (%)0.646Pneumonia122 (65.9)130 (67.4)Aspiration7 (3.8)12 (6.2)Sepsis15 (8.1)13 (6.7)Others41 (22.2)38 (19.7)Types of infection,n (%)0.665Bacteria151 (81.6)154 (79.8)Virus11 (5.9)8 (4.1)Fungus6 (3.3)9 (4.7)Unknown17 (9.2)22 (11.4)PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)200 (160–236.5)126 (82.94–184.62)<0.001Categories of ARDS,n (%)<0.001Mild87 (47.0)36 (18.7)Moderate79 (42.7)81 (41.9)Severe19 (10.3)76 (39.4)WBC, 109/L9.22 (6–11.46)9.8 (7.02–11.84)0.249Hb, g/L118.48 ± 25.49106.29 ± 25.81<0.001RDW, %13.7 (13–15.1)13.9 (13.1–15)0.519Hematocrit0.35 ± 0.080.33 ± 0.090.010Platelets, 109/L178.37 (127–261)161.5 (93–229)0.013Lactate, mmol/L2 (1.25–3.37)2.54 (1.4–4.46)0.017Alb, g/L31.58 ± 6.2530.35 ± 7.020.073MLR0.51 (0.32–0.80)0.59 (0.30–0.93)0.147NLR10.36 (4.99–15.88)14.95 (7.73–27.99)<0.001AST39.45 (21.25–107.53)47.6 (24.68–107.75)0.204ALT38.45 (20–103.38)45.7 (20.08–107.4)0.566Cr,μmol/L103.07 (54.9–183)84.5 (56.35–174.25)0.962BUN, mmol/L9.1 (5.36–15.73)11 (7–17.05)0.011APACHE II score12 (8–15)13 (9–17)0.078SOFA score7 (5–8)8 (6–10)<0.001Intervention (1st24 h), n (%)Steroida91 (49.2)115 (59.6)0.042Alimentotherapy92 (49.7)112 (58.0)0.106Vasoactive drugsb27 (14.6)87 (45.1)<0.001CRRT20 (10.8)34 (17.6)0.059Outcomes28-day mortality,n (%)40 (21.6)73 (37.8)0.001Hospital length of stay14 (9–20)18 (11–26)0.002aSteroid therapy was defined as at least a dose (≥0.5 mg/kg) of methylprednisolone. bVasoactive drugs include epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, dopamine, and phenylephrine. MV, mechanical ventilation; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; RDW, red cell distribution width; Alb, albumin; MLR, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; Cr, creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; APACHE II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy.The characteristics of the NIV and IMV groups are summarized in Table2. Patients in the IMV group had higher NLR values (P=0.001), lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio (126, IQR: 82.94–184.62 vs 139, IQR:100–193.68, P=0.040), higher severity of ARDS, and higher SOFA scores (8, IQR: 6–10 vs 7, IQR: 6–9, P=0.022) and were more likely to use vasoactive drugs (45.1% vs. 28.2%; P=0.002) within 24 h after the ARDS diagnosis compared with NIV group. Furthermore, patients with IMV had higher 28-day mortality and longer hospital length of stay (P=0.023, P=0.013, respectively). Details about baseline characteristics of the non-IMV and IMV groups are shown in Supplementary Material Table S2.Table 2
Comparisons of baseline characteristics between the noninvasive ventilation group and the invasive mechanical ventilation group.
VariablesNIV group (n = 142)IMV group (n = 193)P valueAge (years)68 (60–77)67 (51–75)0.134Male,n (%)97 (68.3)147 (76.2)0.110Smoking,n (%)39 (27.5)48 (24.9)0.593Alcohol abuse,n (%)31 (21.8)39 (20.2)0.718Hypertension,n (%)39 (27.5)57 (29.5)0.679Diabetes mellitus,n (%)34 (23.9)44 (22.8)0.806Coronary artery disease,n (%)17 (12.0)20 (10.4)0.642Risk factor,n (%)0.008Pneumonia118 (83.1)130 (67.4)Aspiration4 (2.8)12 (6.2)Sepsis8 (5.6)13 (6.7)Others12 (8.5)38 (19.7)Types of infection,n (%)0.795Bacteria115 (80.9)154 (79.8)Virus4 (2.9)8 (4.1)Fungus9 (6.3)9 (4.7)Unknown14 (9.9)22 (11.4)PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)139 (100–193.68)126 (82.94–184.62)0.040Categories of ARDS,n (%)0.036Mild30 (21.1)36 (18.7)Moderate75 (52.8)81 (41.9)Severe37 (26.1)76 (39.4)WBC, 109/L9.62 (7.73–11.44)9.8 (7.02–11.84)0.549Hb, g/L106.58 ± 23.78106.29 ± 25.810.919RDW, %13.8 (12.9–15.3)13.9 (13.1–15)0.786Hematocrit0.33 ± 0.080.33 ± 0.090.535Platelets, 109/L155.5 (123.12–228)161.5 (93–229)0.413Lactate, mmol/L2.31 (1.4–3.46)2.54 (1.4–4.46)0.293Alb, g/L32.02 ± 6.4230.35 ± 7.020.026MLR0.63 (0.33–1.08)0.59 (0.30–0.93)0.229NLR10.66 (6.56–17.80)14.95 (7.73–27.99)0.001AST52 (25.3–120)47.6 (24.68–107.75)0.525ALT34.7 (17.8–84.5)45.7 (20.08–107.4)0.220Cr,μmol/L105.15 (62.32–186.12)84.5 (56.35–174.25)0.423BUN, mmol/L11.25 (7.07–17.76)11 (7–17.05)0.872APACHE II score12 (9–15)13 (9–17)0.112SOFA score7 (6–9)8 (6–10)0.022Intervention (1st24 h), n (%)Steroida82 (57.7)115 (59.6)0.735Alimentotherapy73 (51.4)112 (58.0)0.228Vasoactive drugsb40 (28.2)87 (45.1)0.002CRRT21 (14.8)34 (17.6)0.490Outcomes28-day mortality,n (%)37 (26.1)73 (37.8)0.023Hospital length of stay14 (9–22)18 (11–26)0.013aSteroid therapy was defined as at least a dose (≥0.5 mg/kg) of methylprednisolone. bVasoactive drugs include epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, dopamine, and phenylephrine. NIV, noninvasive ventilation; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; RDW, red cell distribution width; Alb, albumin; MLR, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; Cr, creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; APACHE II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy.


## 3.2. Relationship between Baseline NLR and High Risk of IMV

Logistic regression analysis was carried out to screen the independent risk factors for requirement of IMV in ARDS patients. Covariates withP value less than 0.1 in univariate logistic regression analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. In the multivariate logistic regression model, the PaO2/FiO2 (OR, 0.993; 95%CI, 0.989–0.996; P<0.001), the Hb (OR, 0.989; 95%CI, 0.981–0.998; P=0.012), the NLR (OR, 1.042; 95%CI, 1.025–1.060; P<0.001), the lactate (OR, 1.160; 95%CI, 1.063–1.265; P=0.001), and the vasoactive drugs (OR, 2.504; 95% CI, 1.601–3.917; P<0.001) were covariates statistically associated with the requirement of IMV in ARDS patients (Table S3, Table 3).Table 3
Influence factors for requirement of IMV in ARDS patients by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
VariablesUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysisOR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P valueMale,n (%)1.642 (1.098–2.456)0.016PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)0.991 (0.988–0.994)<0.0010.993 (0.989–0.996)<0.001Hb, g/L0.989 (0.982–0.996)0.0030.989 (0.981–0.998)0.012Hematocrit0.106 (0.012–0.960)0.046Platelets, 109/L0.998 (0.996–1.000)0.061Lactate, mmol/L1.166 (1.075–1.263)<0.0011.160 (1.063–1.265)0.001Alb, g/L0.968 (0.942–0.994)0.018NLR1.046 (1.031–1.062)<0.0011.042 (1.025–1.060)<0.001APACHE II score1.043 (1.009–1.078)0.012SOFA score1.137 (1.073–1.205)<0.001Alimentotherapy1.358 (0.948–1.943)0.095Vasoactive drugsb3.185 (2.155–4.707)<0.0012.504 (1.601–3.917)<0.001bVasoactive drugs include epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, dopamine, and phenylephrine. IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; Hb, hemoglobin; Alb, albumin; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; APACHE II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.


## 3.3. Incremental Prognostic Value of NLR

We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to explore the incremental prognostic value of NLR for ARDS patients (Figure2). The baseline model included variables that were significant in multivariate logistic regression analysis, such as PaO2/FiO2, Hb, lactate, and vasoactive drugs. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as 0.738 (95% CI: 0.696–0.777; P<0.001) in the baseline model. With NLR in combination with baseline model, the AUC was calculated as 0.768 (95% CI: 0.728–0.805; P<0.001). Compared with baseline model, the inclusion of NLR resulted in a significant increase in the AUC (P=0.0097, Table 4).Figure 2
ROC curves for the baseline model and baseline model + NLR for predicting the requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS. ROC, receiver operating characteristics; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; baseline model + NLR: the integration parameters of baseline model and NLR; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome.Table 4
The value of indicators in predicting the requirement of IMV in patients with ARDS.
ParametersAUC95%CIP valueBaseline modela0.7380.696–0.777RF+NLR0.7680.728–0.8050.0097aThe baseline model includes variables that are significant in multivariate logistic regression analysis, including male, PaO2/FiO2, Hb, lactate, and vasoactive drugs. IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; RF, reference.


## 3.4. Baseline Characteristics of IMV Group According to the Different Level of NLR

We divided all the IMV group (n = 193) into two subgroups according to the median value of NLR (=14.95), including low NLR group (NLR ≤14.95, n = 97) and high NLR group (NLR >14.95, n = 96). As shown in Table 5, the duration of IMV was longer in patients with high NLR compared with low NLR group (10[IQR, 6–16], 8[IQR, 3–13], respectively, P=0.025). Patients with high NLR had lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio and lower Alb levels (P = 0.024, P<0.001, respectively). Furthermore, MLR, NLR, age, and 28-day mortality were significantly elevated in high NLR patients compared with low NLR patients. Besides, categories of ARDS in the two subgroups were significantly different (P=0.005).Table 5
Baseline characteristics of IMV group in different NLR levels.
VariablesLow NLR (NLR ≤14.95,n = 97)High NLR (NLR >14.95,n = 96)P valueAge (years)63 (47–73)71 (56–77)0.002Male,n (%)77 (79.4)70 (72.9)0.292Smoking,n (%)29 (29.9)19 (19.8)0.104Alcohol abuse,n (%)26 (26.8)13 (13.5)0.022Hypertension,n (%)25 (25.8)32 (33.3)0.250Diabetes mellitus,n (%)17 (17.5)27 (28.1)0.079Coronary artery disease,n (%)13 (13.4)7 (7.3)0.164Risk factor,n (%)0.414Pneumonia60 (61.9)70 (72.9)Aspiration7 (7.2)5 (5.2)Sepsis7 (7.2)6 (6.3)Others23 (23.7)15 (15.6)Types of infection,n (%)0.432Bacteria82 (84.5)72 (75.0)Virus3 (3.1)5 (5.2)Fungus3 (3.1)6 (6.3)Unknown9 (9.3)13 (13.5)PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)140 (89.17–219.84)115 (81.53–166.83)0.024Categories of ARDS,n (%)0.005Mild27 (27.8)9 (9.4)Moderate36 (37.1)45 (46.9)Severe34 (35.1)42 (43.8)WBC, 109/L9.69 (5.95–12.13)9.57 (6.95–11.62)0.947Hb, g/L104.43 ± 27.59108.18 ± 23.880.313RDW, %14.05 (13–15.18)13.7 (13.2–14.8)0.551Hematocrit0.33 ± 0.090.33 ± 0.080.862Platelets, 109/L168.43 ± 105.87172.20 ± 99.180.799Lactate, mmol/L2.39 (1.28–4.90)2.61 (1.5–4.22)0.864Alb, g/L33 (27.5–36.77)28.4 (23.2–32.4)<0.001MLR0.39 (0.25–0.64)0.79 (0.48–1.37)<0.001NLR7.79 (3.78–10.80)27.99 (20.15–47.36)<0.001AST46 (23.4–138)48 (27.2–86.6)0.877ALT43.6 (20–107.2)49 (20.4–108)0.984Cr,μmol/L80.3 (52–164.28)88.85 (60.55–183.91)0.217BUN, mmol/L10.11 (6.71–16.02)11.83 (6.96–19.28)0.158APACHE II score12 (8–16)14 (9–18)0.283SOFA score8 (6–10)8 (6–10)0.885Interventions,n (%)Steroida57 (58.8)58 (60.4)0.815Alimentotherapy52 (53.6)60 (62.5)0.211Vasoactive drugsb41 (42.3)46 (47.9)0.430CRRT16 (16.5)18 (18.8)0.68128-day mortality,n (%)29 (29.9)44 (45.8)0.022Duration of ventilation8 (3–13)10 (6–16)0.025Hospital length of stay16 (8–25)18 (12–26)0.173aSteroid therapy was defined as at least a dose (≥0.5 mg/kg) of methylprednisolone. bVasoactive drugs include epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, dopamine, and phenylephrine. IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; RDW, red cell distribution width; Alb, albumin; MLR, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; Cr, creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; APACHE II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy.


## 4. Discussion

In the current study, we demonstrated that the baseline NLR after diagnosis of ARDS was independently associated with an increased risk of IMV; other independent risk factors included PaO2/FiO2 ratio, Hb, lactate, and the use of vasoactive drugs. Additionally, higher NLR was associated with prolonged duration of IMV in patients with ARDS.ARDS is a sudden and fatal disease with an increasing incidence rate, ranging from 20% to 40% and associated with high mortality (ranging from 35% to 40%) [2, 3], as dramatically highlighted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic [18, 19]. The histologic characteristic of ARDS is widely considered to be “diffuse alveolar damage,” which is initially driven by dysregulated inflammation response [20]. In the acute stage of ARDS, tiny blood vessels in the lung become leaky, causing protein-rich fluid to fill up the smallest air sacs in the lung (called alveoli), and this is followed by interstitial widening by oedema and then fibroblast infiltration in the subacute phase [21]. COVID-19-related ARDS also causes the typical ARDS pathological changes of diffuse alveolar damage in the lung [22, 23]. As a result, the lung cannot effectively provide oxygen to the rest of the body and clear carbon dioxide, which means that many ARDS patients require ventilator support with NIV or IMV to help them breathe [1]. A study based on the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database investigated the epidemiological trends in MV use in Spain from 2001 to 2015, which showed an increase in the utilization of NIV while the use of IMV has decreased, and patients who received IMV had a higher in-hospital mortality than those who received NIV [24]. In ARDS, NIV has been shown to be capable of preventing endotracheal intubation in patients with mild-to-moderate hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 >150 mmHg), which is effective and safe. However, for patients with moderate-to-severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 ≤150 mmHg), the role of NIV strategies remains unclear [7]. Clinical outcome improves when NIV successfully allows avoiding endotracheal intubation. However, if IMV is needed after a failing trial of NIV, mortality is increased [25]. Consequently, it is important for clinicians to tailor interventions based on patients’ individual requirements that can reduce mortality in patients with ARDS.NLR is the ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte count and is a simple combined index that can be easily used to evaluate a patient’s inflammatory status [26]. A study including 413 active subjects showed that normal NLR value ranges from 0.78 to 3.53 in an adult, nongeriatric population in good health [9]. Furthermore, NLR is a relatively stable parameter that did not significantly change with age and gender [27]. As the result of apoptosis in lymphocytes and an increase in neutrophils, the increase in NLR reflects the balance between lymphocyte count and neutrophil count and may reflect the systemic immune status more comprehensively [28]. Neutrophils are positively associated with the severity of inflammation in ARDS; moreover, they are the first immune cells to be recruited to the site of inflammation after being stimulated by chemokines released from injured lung tissue [23]. Meanwhile, the literature showed that lymphocytes were essential in regulating the appropriate inflammatory response, and low circulating lymphocytes may perpetuate a harmful inflammatory status [29, 30].Previous studies have shown that increased baseline NLR was associated with poor clinical outcomes in a variety of diseases, such as solid tumors [10, 31], cardiovascular diseases [12], and inflammation-related diseases. Recent studies also reported the relationship between increased NLR and clinical prognosis of ARDS. The conclusions of these studies all suggested that elevated NLR was associated with poor prognosis of ARDS patients. Wang et al. showed that a high NLR (>14) was independently associated with a shorter overall survival in patients with ARDS [32]. Li et al. suggested that NLR was an independent risk factor for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with ARDS [33]. More recently, Zhang et al. found that high NLR (≥14.8) at ICU admission was correlated with higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality in ARDS patients [28]. In addition, a previous study including 81 patients with COVID-19 revealed that NLR >9.8 could predict the overall requirement of IMV [34]. An interim analysis of an ongoing prospective study showed that NLR >4.6 were moderately good in predicting the early requirement of MV within 24 h in COVID-19 patients [13]. Based on the available studies, we supposed that elevated NLR values are associated with IMV in ARDS patients on the evidence of the correlation between NLR-related inflammation and ARDS disease severity.In the present study, we found the mortality of ARDS patients was quite high, and patients who received IMV had higher 28-day mortality and longer hospital length of stay than those who received NIV or without ventilatory support; this is consistent with previous studies. Besides, patients who received IMV had higher NLR levels, higher severity of ARDS, higher SOFA scores, and lower PaO2/FiO2 ratios and were more likely to use vasoactive drugs at the time of ARDS diagnosis. Furthermore, there were some significant differences in sex and laboratory parameters (hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, lactate, and blood urea nitrogen) compared with non-MV group. We also observed that NLR was a risk factor for requirement of IMV in ARDS independent of Hb, lactate, vasoactive drugs, and Berlin classification. By combining NLR with other independent risk factors, we found it could reach a better predicting effect than using others alone, as indicated by the ROC curve analysis (Figure 2). Severity of ARDS is related to the severity of pulmonary impairment, and more severe ARDS needs a prolonged ventilation time. In our study, patients with high NLR in the IMV group had a higher severity of ARDS and longer duration of IMV. 28-day mortality was also increased compared to those in the low NLR group. The current study suggests that this combined inflammatory-related parameter may be useful for assessing the disease severity, which might be helpful in evaluating the distribution of respiratory equipment in ARDS patients and adjusting clinical treatments and nursing interventions.There are several limitations in our study. Firstly, this is a retrospective study that included a small number of Chinese patients. Secondly, intubation and initiation of MV care were decided by attending physicians, which may have subjectively impacted on the outcome. Thirdly, NLR was calculated only once at 24 h after the ARDS diagnosis, so whether continuous monitoring NLR level could better predict the requirement and the duration of IMV in patients with ARDS remains unclear. Further studies, particularly prospective studies with greater sample sizes, are needed to reveal the clinical significance of elevated NLR level and the correlation between NLR and IMV in patients with ARDS.


## 5. Conclusions

Based on the results of this study, NLR was elevated in ARDS patients, especially those with IMV. We found that high baseline NLR level was significantly correlated with an increased risk of IMV in patients with ARDS. Furthermore, higher NLR was associated with prolonged duration of IMV. Therefore, this combined inflammatory index can function as a potential parameter to help evaluate the severity of ARDS and predict the requirement and the duration of IMV in patients with ARDS.



---

*Source: 1581038-2022-07-16.xml*