# Postoperative Etoricoxib versus Ketoprofen Administration for Pain Management after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Study

Authors: Simona Cionac Florescu; Denisa Madalina Anastase; Ana Maria Munteanu; Cristian Ioan Stoica
Journal: Journal of Anesthesiology
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Objective. This randomized double-blind study compared the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib versus ketoprofen in 165 patients with elective total primary knee arthroplasty.Methods. After ethical committee approval, 165 patients were randomized in 3 groups: the etoricoxib group (E) receiving etoricoxib 120 mg/day, at the end of surgery and in the first postoperative day; the ketoprofen group (K) receiving ketoprofen 2 pills of 100 mg/day, the first at the end of surgery and then 1 pill every 12 hours in the surgery day and the first postoperative day; the placebo group (P). All groups received postoperatively the same analgesia protocol when NRS is over 3 with IV Perfalgan and morphine. The effectiveness was evaluated by the time from the initiation of spinal anesthesia until the first analgesic dose, the total amount of morphine administered in the surgery day and the first postoperative day, and the frequency of patients with side effects and necessary amount of adjuvant medication.Results. The baseline demographic characteristics were similar among the 3 groups. In both study days etoricoxib provided an analgesic effect superior to placebo and to ketoprofen, the total administered morphine being significantly lower in etoricoxib group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding the side effects.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In total knee replacement surgery, patients may have moderate to severe pain in the postoperative period. Because of side effects of opioids, postoperative analgesia with a combination of agents and techniques known as multimodal analgesia is recognized as the most effective practice in pain management [1].The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) provide good pain relief when combined with opioids in multimodal analgesia regimens, but guidelines generally recommend patients to discontinue them due to the inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) by traditional NSAIDs, which has been shown to interfere with platelet aggregation leading to the possibility of increased bleeding in surgical wound [2].Ketoprofen is a NSAID derivative of propionic acid. Although used as a racemic mixture, the pharmacodynamics activity and its anti-inflammatory effect is due entirely to the S (+) enantiomer (dexketoprofen), while the R (–) enantiomer is devoid of such activity [3]. It is very highly bound to plasma protein, reaches maximum plasma concentration occuring after 6–8 hours, and declines thereafter with a half-life of about 8 hours; also it diffuses into the synovial fluid. It is metabolized primarily by conjugation and eliminated mainly by the kidneys [4].The appearance of coxibs, selective inhibitors of COX-2 agents, brought advantages in postoperative pain management because they are not associated with the side effects of NSAIDs and therefore can be used more safely [5].A representative of this class is etoricoxib (Arcoxia) which has demonstrated efficacy in many painful conditions. It has the largest selectivity of the coxibs (COX-2/COX-1 of 106) [6], a good absorption rate, and the half-life of 22 hours allowing administration of a single 120 mg pill per day. Literature data show that the installation of its action is just 24 minutes after the administration [7].The aim of this prospective double-blinded randomized study was to investigate the effect of etoricoxib versus ketoprofen in reducing the amount of morphine required for postoperative analgesia following total knee replacement. In this setting total morphine consumption, duration of anesthesia, the side effects of drugs administered, and the necessary amount of adjuvant medication were evaluated.


## 2. Materials and Methods

After the approval of local ethics committee and signed informed consent of the patients, 165 ASA I-II patients with age between 20 and 85 years, weight over 40 kg, height above 155 cm, and Hct ≥ 30%, with primary degenerative joint disease undergoing elective total primary knee replacement were included in the study; the surgery technique was the same in all patients.Patients with history of bronchial asthma, endocrine disorders, severe hepatic and renal diseases, neuropathies, bleeding disorders, preexisting gastric ulcers, gastritis and history of gastrointestinal bleeding, dementia, cooperation disability, and sensitivity to the drugs used in study were not included. Also patients with long-acting NSAID administered in the last four days before surgery were not included in the study, like those with cerebrovascular or peripheral arterial disease, congestive heart failure (NYHA II–IV), or HTA not controlled appropriately [4, 8].The patients who agreed to consent were enrolled and randomized by a computer generated random number list (GraphPad Prism 6,http://www.graphpad.com/) prepared by an investigator with no clinical involvement in the trial. The result of the randomization (the allocation for groups E, K, or P) was written on a note placed inside a numbered envelope (one number corresponding to every patient enrolled). The main investigator was the only person who had access to the randomization code and who stored it. Another investigator not involved in patient care and unaware of the allocation group of the patient opened the sealed envelope and performed the administration of the pills.Patients were randomised in 3 groups of 55 patients each:(1)
The etoricoxib group (E) received etoricoxib 1 pill of 120 mg orally postoperatively at the end of surgery and a second etoricoxib 120 mg pill after 24 hours (at the beginning of the first postoperative day); this group also received 1 sham pill every 12 hours intercalated between the two active doses of etoricoxib.(2)
The ketoprofen group (K) received ketoprofen 1 pill of 100 mg orally at the end of surgery and then 1 pill every 12 hours during the surgery day and first postoperative day.(3)
The patients in the placebo group received sham pills in the same way (at the end of surgery and every 12 h, during the surgery day and first postoperative day). We used placebo pills with the same appearance as ketoprofen.To maintain the blinding conditions, medical staff had no knowledge of the randomization of the patients or the contents of the pills.The pills were administered at the end of the surgery, immediately after the patients arrived in the PACU, and no one had nausea and vomiting.


### 2.1. Anesthetic Technique

All patients had 0.01 mg/kg intravenous midazolam for premedication (Dormicum, Roche, Switzerland). The operations were performed under spinal anesthesia with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine using 25- or 27-gauge Whitacre needles. Propofol 2-3 mg/kg/hour was given for the intraoperative sedation.


### 2.2. Postoperative Analgesia

Postoperatively all subjects were transferred in the postoperative care unit (PACU) during the study period. Pain was assessed by the duty nurses at the first postoperative demand for analgesia by the patients either verbally or by pushing a button. Evaluation of postoperative pain intensity was performed using the numerical rating scale (NRS, from 0 to 10), the patient being informed about it preoperatively. We defined as “duration of analgesia” the time from spinal puncture to the first analgesic demand.The multimodal analgesia plan was started when patients began to experience pain (NRS > 3) by the administration of paracetamol (Perfalgan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, USA) in a fixed and scheduled dose 1 g IV infusion for 15 minutes every 8 hours. If after paracetamol infusion NRS remains over 3, morphine (morphine hydrochloride, Sanofi Aventis Zentiva, Paris, France) was administered according to the IV titration protocol approved and applied in PACU of our hospital (Figure1). This analgesia protocol was also applied in the first postoperative day.Figure 1
Postoperative morphine titration protocol (Foisor Hospital, Bucharest).Simultaneously with the first dose of opioid injection ondansetron (Osetron, Dr. Reddy’s, India) was administered at a dose of 4 mg IV.Adverse events such as sedation, nausea, vomiting, dryness of mouth, sweating, urinary retention, respiratory depression, hypotension, tachycardia, and surgery bleeding were recorded during the study.Sedation was evaluated by a four-point scale: (1) awake, (2) reacting to the verbal stimulant, (3) reacting to the painful stimulant, and (4) no reaction to the painful stimulant.The respiratory rate below 8 per minute was defined as a respiratory depression and treated with repeated doses of naloxone to remission.Heart rate below 50 per minute was considered as bradycardia and treated with IV atropine; also hypotension was considered as the lowering of mean arterial pressure by more than 30% of its preoperative value and IV ephedrine was administered.In case of pruritus a loratadine (Claritin) tablet was indicated.During the study we monitored the following parameters:(i)
The amount of morphine required during the first 24 hours (day of surgery) and next 24 hours (first postoperative day), at rest as the primary outcome.(ii)
The duration of analgesia defined as the time from the initiation of spinal anesthesia until the patient asked for the first dose of analgesic as the secondary outcome.(iii)
The frequency of patients with side effects, the necessary amount of adjuvant medication also as the secondary outcome.


### 2.3. Statistical Analysis

We used GraphPad StatMate 2 and GraphPad Prism 6 (http://www.graphpad.com/). The calculation of the sample size relied on the primary outcome (postoperative morphine consumption), which from our previous studies was 40±14 mg SD in the placebo group [9]. In order to demonstrate a difference of the means (delta) of 5–7 points between the two drugs, not between drugs and placebo only, with a power of 85% and a type I error (alfa) of 0.05, we found that each group should have at least 50 patients. We analyzed the data based on intention-to-treat principle.Either chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze categorical outcomes. Differences among 3 groups of continuous variables were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post hoc analysis was performed with Tukey test.


## 2.1. Anesthetic Technique

All patients had 0.01 mg/kg intravenous midazolam for premedication (Dormicum, Roche, Switzerland). The operations were performed under spinal anesthesia with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine using 25- or 27-gauge Whitacre needles. Propofol 2-3 mg/kg/hour was given for the intraoperative sedation.


## 2.2. Postoperative Analgesia

Postoperatively all subjects were transferred in the postoperative care unit (PACU) during the study period. Pain was assessed by the duty nurses at the first postoperative demand for analgesia by the patients either verbally or by pushing a button. Evaluation of postoperative pain intensity was performed using the numerical rating scale (NRS, from 0 to 10), the patient being informed about it preoperatively. We defined as “duration of analgesia” the time from spinal puncture to the first analgesic demand.The multimodal analgesia plan was started when patients began to experience pain (NRS > 3) by the administration of paracetamol (Perfalgan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, USA) in a fixed and scheduled dose 1 g IV infusion for 15 minutes every 8 hours. If after paracetamol infusion NRS remains over 3, morphine (morphine hydrochloride, Sanofi Aventis Zentiva, Paris, France) was administered according to the IV titration protocol approved and applied in PACU of our hospital (Figure1). This analgesia protocol was also applied in the first postoperative day.Figure 1
Postoperative morphine titration protocol (Foisor Hospital, Bucharest).Simultaneously with the first dose of opioid injection ondansetron (Osetron, Dr. Reddy’s, India) was administered at a dose of 4 mg IV.Adverse events such as sedation, nausea, vomiting, dryness of mouth, sweating, urinary retention, respiratory depression, hypotension, tachycardia, and surgery bleeding were recorded during the study.Sedation was evaluated by a four-point scale: (1) awake, (2) reacting to the verbal stimulant, (3) reacting to the painful stimulant, and (4) no reaction to the painful stimulant.The respiratory rate below 8 per minute was defined as a respiratory depression and treated with repeated doses of naloxone to remission.Heart rate below 50 per minute was considered as bradycardia and treated with IV atropine; also hypotension was considered as the lowering of mean arterial pressure by more than 30% of its preoperative value and IV ephedrine was administered.In case of pruritus a loratadine (Claritin) tablet was indicated.During the study we monitored the following parameters:(i)
The amount of morphine required during the first 24 hours (day of surgery) and next 24 hours (first postoperative day), at rest as the primary outcome.(ii)
The duration of analgesia defined as the time from the initiation of spinal anesthesia until the patient asked for the first dose of analgesic as the secondary outcome.(iii)
The frequency of patients with side effects, the necessary amount of adjuvant medication also as the secondary outcome.


## 2.3. Statistical Analysis

We used GraphPad StatMate 2 and GraphPad Prism 6 (http://www.graphpad.com/). The calculation of the sample size relied on the primary outcome (postoperative morphine consumption), which from our previous studies was 40±14 mg SD in the placebo group [9]. In order to demonstrate a difference of the means (delta) of 5–7 points between the two drugs, not between drugs and placebo only, with a power of 85% and a type I error (alfa) of 0.05, we found that each group should have at least 50 patients. We analyzed the data based on intention-to-treat principle.Either chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze categorical outcomes. Differences among 3 groups of continuous variables were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post hoc analysis was performed with Tukey test.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Demographic Data

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (x±SD). The results are considered statistically significant if the p<0.05.The three groups were similar in terms of age, weight, height, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, number of patients, and surgery duration (Table1).Table 1
Demographic data.
Group
Etoricoxib
Ketoprofen
Placebo
Number
55
55
55
Age, yrs
66.2 ± 8.6
70.1 ± 6.4
65.0 ± 7.7
Weight, kg
76.8 ± 14
79 ± 12.5
70.1 ± 11
Height, cm
162.7 ± 7.6
163.6 ± 16
163.3 ± 7.5
Sex, f/m
41/14
44/11
46/9


### 3.2. Morphine Consumption

The average morphine consumption on the day of surgery was 27 mg for etoricoxib group, 35.02 mg for ketoprofen group, and 40.15 mg for placebo group (Table2, Figure 2). On the first postoperative day the means were 13.58 mg for group E, 22.73 mg for group K, and 30.95 mg for group P (Table 2, Figure 2).Table 2
Morphine consumption (mg).
Group
Mean (mg)
Std. deviation
Std. error
95% confidence interval for mean
Minimum
Maximum
Lower bound
Upper bound
Morphine consumption on the day of surgery
Group E
27.00
14.26
1.92
30.63
38.34
7.50
72.00
Group K
35.02
13.85
1.87
31.27
38.76
12.00
88.50
Group P
40.15
11.76
1.59
36.97
43.33
15.00
88.00
Morphine consumption on postoperative day 1
Group E
13.58
9.14
1.23
11.11
16.05
0.0
34.5
Group K
22.73
11.28
1.51
19.69
25.76
6.0
59.5
Group P
30.94
13.16
1.77
27.40
34.51
11.0
92.0Figure 2
Morphine consumption (mg).One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were performed. The results showed a significant effect of Etoricoxib compared to placebo (p<0.0001) and to ketoprofen (p<0.004) to reduce morphine requirements in the first 24 h postoperative and in the first postoperative day (Table 3).Table 3
Morphine consumption—results of multiple  comparisons Tukey’s test.
Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
Mean diff.
95% CI of diff.
Significant
Summary
p
Morphine consumption on the day of surgery
Etoricoxib versus ketoprofen
−7.8
−14 to −2.1
Yes
∗
∗
0.0044
Etoricoxib versus placebo
−13
−19 to −7.2
Yes
∗
∗
∗
∗
<0.0001
Placebo versus ketoprofen
5.1
−0.85 to 11
No
Ns
0.1090
Morphine consumption on the postoperative day 1
Etoricoxib versus ketoprofen
−9.8
−15 to –4.3
Yes
∗
∗
∗
∗
<0.0001
Etoricoxib versus placebo
−18
−23 to −13
Yes
∗
∗
∗
∗
<0.0001
Placebo versus ketoprofen
8.2
3.1 to 13
Yes
∗
∗
∗
<0.0006


### 3.3. The Duration of Analgesia

The average duration of analgesia was 337 minutes for group E, 283.45 minutes for group K, and 266.36 minutes for group P (Table4, Figure 3). Tukey’s multiple comparisons test confirmed a significant analgesic effect of Etoricoxib compared to placebo and to ketoprofen (Table 5). For better understanding the type of distribution we used D’Agostino & Pearson normality test and calculated also median and interquartile range of duration of analgesia (minutes).Table 4
Duration of analgesia (min).
Group
Mean
Std. dev.
95% confidence interval for mean
Median
25% percentile
75% percentile
Normality test passed
Lower bound
Upper bound
Group E
337
89
295
344
320
275
380
No
Group K
283
76
262
304
285
240
330
Yes
Group P
247
48
236
256
245
210
285
YesTable 5
Duration of analgesia—results of multiple comparisons Tukey’s test.
Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
Mean diff.
95% CI of diff.
Significant
Summary
p
Etoricoxib versus ketoprofen
51
21 to 82
Yes
∗
∗
∗
<0.0003
Etoricoxib versus placebo
90
59 to 121
Yes
∗
∗
∗
∗
<0.0001
Placebo versus ketoprofen
−39
−69 to −7.8
Yes
∗
∗
<0.0097Figure 3
Mean duration of analgesia (min).


### 3.4. The Side Effects

The overall incidence of adverse events in the 3 groups of the study was small. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding the side effects.The most common side effects of morphine administration were nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, and sedation; there were no significant differences between groups (Table6).Table 6
The side effects.
Side effects
Number of cases/group
Group E
Group K
Group P
Vomiting
3
4
6
Nausea
3
4
4
Sedation
2
3
3
Bradycardia
1
1
1
Dizziness
0
1
1
O2 desaturation
0
0
1There were no reported specific side effects related to etoricoxib administered in the 2 study days.


## 3.1. Demographic Data

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (x±SD). The results are considered statistically significant if the p<0.05.The three groups were similar in terms of age, weight, height, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, number of patients, and surgery duration (Table1).Table 1
Demographic data.
Group
Etoricoxib
Ketoprofen
Placebo
Number
55
55
55
Age, yrs
66.2 ± 8.6
70.1 ± 6.4
65.0 ± 7.7
Weight, kg
76.8 ± 14
79 ± 12.5
70.1 ± 11
Height, cm
162.7 ± 7.6
163.6 ± 16
163.3 ± 7.5
Sex, f/m
41/14
44/11
46/9


## 3.2. Morphine Consumption

The average morphine consumption on the day of surgery was 27 mg for etoricoxib group, 35.02 mg for ketoprofen group, and 40.15 mg for placebo group (Table2, Figure 2). On the first postoperative day the means were 13.58 mg for group E, 22.73 mg for group K, and 30.95 mg for group P (Table 2, Figure 2).Table 2
Morphine consumption (mg).
Group
Mean (mg)
Std. deviation
Std. error
95% confidence interval for mean
Minimum
Maximum
Lower bound
Upper bound
Morphine consumption on the day of surgery
Group E
27.00
14.26
1.92
30.63
38.34
7.50
72.00
Group K
35.02
13.85
1.87
31.27
38.76
12.00
88.50
Group P
40.15
11.76
1.59
36.97
43.33
15.00
88.00
Morphine consumption on postoperative day 1
Group E
13.58
9.14
1.23
11.11
16.05
0.0
34.5
Group K
22.73
11.28
1.51
19.69
25.76
6.0
59.5
Group P
30.94
13.16
1.77
27.40
34.51
11.0
92.0Figure 2
Morphine consumption (mg).One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were performed. The results showed a significant effect of Etoricoxib compared to placebo (p<0.0001) and to ketoprofen (p<0.004) to reduce morphine requirements in the first 24 h postoperative and in the first postoperative day (Table 3).Table 3
Morphine consumption—results of multiple  comparisons Tukey’s test.
Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
Mean diff.
95% CI of diff.
Significant
Summary
p
Morphine consumption on the day of surgery
Etoricoxib versus ketoprofen
−7.8
−14 to −2.1
Yes
∗
∗
0.0044
Etoricoxib versus placebo
−13
−19 to −7.2
Yes
∗
∗
∗
∗
<0.0001
Placebo versus ketoprofen
5.1
−0.85 to 11
No
Ns
0.1090
Morphine consumption on the postoperative day 1
Etoricoxib versus ketoprofen
−9.8
−15 to –4.3
Yes
∗
∗
∗
∗
<0.0001
Etoricoxib versus placebo
−18
−23 to −13
Yes
∗
∗
∗
∗
<0.0001
Placebo versus ketoprofen
8.2
3.1 to 13
Yes
∗
∗
∗
<0.0006


## 3.3. The Duration of Analgesia

The average duration of analgesia was 337 minutes for group E, 283.45 minutes for group K, and 266.36 minutes for group P (Table4, Figure 3). Tukey’s multiple comparisons test confirmed a significant analgesic effect of Etoricoxib compared to placebo and to ketoprofen (Table 5). For better understanding the type of distribution we used D’Agostino & Pearson normality test and calculated also median and interquartile range of duration of analgesia (minutes).Table 4
Duration of analgesia (min).
Group
Mean
Std. dev.
95% confidence interval for mean
Median
25% percentile
75% percentile
Normality test passed
Lower bound
Upper bound
Group E
337
89
295
344
320
275
380
No
Group K
283
76
262
304
285
240
330
Yes
Group P
247
48
236
256
245
210
285
YesTable 5
Duration of analgesia—results of multiple comparisons Tukey’s test.
Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
Mean diff.
95% CI of diff.
Significant
Summary
p
Etoricoxib versus ketoprofen
51
21 to 82
Yes
∗
∗
∗
<0.0003
Etoricoxib versus placebo
90
59 to 121
Yes
∗
∗
∗
∗
<0.0001
Placebo versus ketoprofen
−39
−69 to −7.8
Yes
∗
∗
<0.0097Figure 3
Mean duration of analgesia (min).


## 3.4. The Side Effects

The overall incidence of adverse events in the 3 groups of the study was small. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding the side effects.The most common side effects of morphine administration were nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, and sedation; there were no significant differences between groups (Table6).Table 6
The side effects.
Side effects
Number of cases/group
Group E
Group K
Group P
Vomiting
3
4
6
Nausea
3
4
4
Sedation
2
3
3
Bradycardia
1
1
1
Dizziness
0
1
1
O2 desaturation
0
0
1There were no reported specific side effects related to etoricoxib administered in the 2 study days.


## 4. Discussion

The total knee arthroplasty is one of the best orthopedic interventions that reduces painful symptoms and improves the functionality and mobility of patients with osteoarthritis, increasing the quality of life [10].But these operations can be associated with significant postoperative pain. In addition to patient discomfort and satisfaction, inadequate pain management determines many medical complications contributing to a prolongation of the length of hospital stay, readmission to hospital, and higher costs [11].In the treatment of postoperative pain, opioids are used as first-line drugs, but because of their side effects they are combined with NSAIDs. Analgesic action of NSAIDs is carried out by inhibition of inducible COX-2 in peripheral tissues, nerves, and the central nervous system; however, by blocking also constitutive COX-1 they cause gastrointestinal toxicity and affect platelet function, increasing the risk of bleeding, which limits their use perioperatively [2].The COX-2 selective inhibitors spare the use of opioids without affecting platelet function, finding an important place in the postoperative pain management of patients [12].Several clinical trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of etoricoxib in reducing postoperative pain in orthopedic surgery compared with placebo or active comparator, either preemptively or postoperatively [13–15].Thus, Rasmussen et al. showed that etoricoxib 120 mg after surgery in patients with TKA or THA provided analgesia superior to placebo and similar to naproxen 1100 mg [16]. The results of a study of Rawal et al. showed that etoricoxib 120 mg was administered also postoperatively in patients with TKA effects superior to placebo and equal to ibuprofen 1800 mg to reduce pain at rest and opioid consumption [17]. These results are overlapping investigations by Lin et al. recently published in 2013, who showed the benefits of perioperative administration of COX-2 inhibitors [18].Studies that compare NSAIDs with coxibs to treat postoperative pain are rare [2, 19].In our double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized clinical study, we evaluated postoperative pain following knee replacement in patients receiving placebo, etoricoxib 120 mg, or ketoprofen 200 mg daily.Etoricoxib had a rapid onset of pain relief and prolonged duration of action in comparison to placebo and ketoprofen in the first 24 hours postoperatively, which is consistent with data published in the literature concerning the treatment of postoperative pain in major orthopedic surgery [20].The benefits of etoricoxib became more evident in the first postoperative day, with an important reduction of rescue medication use, the total amount of morphine being significantly less than in other groups of patients.Another important variable is the duration of analgesia, which is the highest in etoricoxib group providing an increased degree of patient satisfaction.Etoricoxib was well tolerated during the 2-day study; the incidence of adverse events was infrequent and similar across treatment groups.According to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) when coxibs are prescribed in accordance with contraindications and precautions, the balance between the risks versus benefit remains positive in target patients [21].Some limitations of our study refer to the fact that we have assessed pain only at rest and did not follow up the evolution of patients in terms of cardiovascular complications longer than hospital stay (mean 6.3 days).


## 5. Conclusions

In this clinical study, in the treatment of pain following a total knee arthroplasty, etoricoxib at a dose of 120 mg, administered postoperatively and in the first postoperative day, demonstrated a greater pain control as compared with placebo and ketoprofen 200 mg daily, evidenced by a significant decrease in opioid use, with a greater duration of anesthesia.



---

*Source: 158317-2015-12-31.xml*