# Bioactivities of Traditional Medicinal Plants in Alexandria

Authors: Hosam O. Elansary; Agnieszka Szopa; Paweł Kubica; Halina Ekiert; Hayssam M. Ali; Mohamed S. Elshikh; Eslam M. Abdel-Salam; Mohamed El-Esawi; Diaa O. El-Ansary
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

In traditional folklore, medicinal herbs play a vital role in the prevention and treatment of microbial diseases. In the present study, the phenolic profiles of the medicinal plantsAsparagus aethiopicus L.,Citrullus colocynthis L.,Senna alexandrina L.,Kalanchoe delagoensis L.,Gasteria pillansii L.,Cymbopogon citratus,Brassica juncea, andCurcuma longa L. were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with a diode-array detector method. The results revealed rich sources of important compounds such as robinin in the fruits and leaves ofA. aethiopicus; caffeic acid in the tubers ofA. aethiopicus and quercitrin in the leaves ofG. pillansii. Further, relatively high antioxidant, antibacterial, and antifungal activities were observed inC. colocynthis fruit coat,S. alexandrina pods, andA. aethiopicus leaves, respectively. The relatively higher the bioactivities of plants extracts associated with the phenols in these plants, in particular, the more abundant the phenols. Therefore, it was concluded that the fruit coat ofC. colocynthis, pods ofS. alexandrina, and leaves ofA. aethiopicus might be excellent sources of natural products. These plant extracts also have a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activities that could be used in the pharmaceutical industries and to control diseases.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Medicinal plants represent an important part of disease remedy in economically weak regions of the world, such as Africa [1, 2]. The South Mediterranean region, including Egypt, is a rich source of medicinal plants that have several uses as alternative medicine across history [3, 4]. Some of these medicinal plants, such as mint [5–7] and basil [8, 9], have been thoroughly investigated. However, many medicinal plants, includingAsparagus aethiopicus L. andCitrullus colocynthis L., have not been well studied, especially their phenolic profile and bioactivity.The genusAsparagus, belonging to the family Liliaceae, contains about 300 species that are widely used as complementary and alternative medicines for treating dysuria, diabetes, epilepsy, night blindness, tumors, and dysentery. They are also used for enhancing appetite and increasing milk secretion in women [10, 11]. The speciesA. aethiopicus is common across Egypt, and few studies have investigated this species. A study on plants of the South Delta region indicated that the leaves ofA. aethiopicus contain flavonoids and have moderate antioxidant activities [12]. Furthermore, other species ofAsparagus have revealed great diversity in their chemical composition. Aberoumand [13] identified fatty acids in the wildAsparagus officinalis from Iran.Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad, commonly known as bitter apple, belongs to the family Cucurbitaceae and grows naturally in the Egyptian desert. The plant is traditionally used for treating cancer, leukemia, rheumatism, and amenorrhea and also used as an insect repellant [14, 15]. Gurudeeban et al. [16] reported several traditional uses of the IndianC. colocynthis, including its use as antidiabetic, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. However, the information available on the Egyptian ecotype ofCitrullus colocynthis is scarce in relation to its phenolic composition and bioactivities.Cymbopogon citratus (Poaceae), commonly known as lemon grass, a native of Southeast Asia, is widely grown in Africa as a medicinal herb [17]. The plant is traditionally used in folk medicine as an anti-inflammatory agent and also used as an insect repellent. A recent investigation indicated the presence of polyphenolic flavonoids, including luteolin and apigenin, with anti-inflammatory activity in the leaves ofC.citratus [18].The genusGasteria, a native of South Africa, contains 23 species. One of the speciesG. pillansii (L.) Haw, a succulent, is widely cultivated as an ornamental plant in Egypt [19]. Few studies have been conducted on the genus revealing the presence of dihydroanthracenones inG. bicolor [20].Kalanchoe delagoensis L. (Crassulaceae), a succulent plant, native of Madagascar, is known to contain bufadienolide cardiac glycosides that are toxic [21]. However, thus far, studies have not been conducted to characterize the phenolic profile of this plant.Brassica juncea (Brassicaceae) is traditionally used as a stimulant, a rubefacient, an emetic, and a diuretic, and it is consumed as food as well [22]. Few studies have indicated thatB. juncea contain some phenols [23].Curcuma longa (Zingiberaceae), commonly known as turmeric, is considered a medicinal plant and is also used as a spice. The roots (rhizomes) are used in traditional Indian and Chinese medicines to treat wounds, acne, flu, and urinary tract and liver diseases [24]. The roots contain phenols, such as diferuloylmethane (curcumin), that have antioxidant and anticancer properties [25, 26].Another common medicinal plant in Egypt isSenna alexandrina L. (Fabaceae), which is distributed around the Nile River. Traditionally, the plant is used for treating stomach pain and constipation, because of its laxative effects [27, 28]. The pods (fruits) have a high percent of glycosides, including the sennosides A, B, C, and D, as well as anthraquinones [29, 30]. The phenolic compounds are the major phytochemicals that are universally present in plants (estimated to be 10,000 compounds) and are responsible for the bioactivity of the plant extracts [31, 32]. The search for natural products in plants is strongly associated with the presence of phenolic compounds, since they have antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [33–35]. The phenolic profile and bioactivities of the traditional medicinal plants in northern Egypt have not been fully explored. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the phenolic qualitative and quantitative profiles of the selected medicinal plants that are used in complementary and alternative medicines by the local people. Furthermore, the antioxidant activity of the extracts was evaluated by 2,2′-diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and β-carotene-linoleic acid assays. The antibacterial and antifungal activities of each plant were also evaluated to identify and elucidate the bioactivity of the identified main phenolic compounds.


## 2. Material and Methods

### 2.1. Plant Material

The leaves, fruits, and tubers ofA. aethiopicus L. (A. sprengeri Regel) and leaves of bothG. pillansii L. Haw andK. delagoensis L. were obtained from the Department of Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture Nursery in El-Shatby, Alexandria. The fruit coat and flesh with seeds ofC. colocynthis L., leaves ofC.citratus (DC). Stapf, and pods ofS. alexandrina Mill were obtained from commercial farms in Alexandria Governorate in northern Egypt. Further, the seeds ofB. juncea L. and roots ofC. longa L. were procured from a local herbalist. All the plants were identified by Dr. H. Elansary and vouchered at the Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria, in June 2017.


### 2.2. Bioactivity Assays

To determine the bioactivity of the samples, the total dry weight was determined by drying the cleaned plant parts (0.25 mg) in an oven at 35°C to reach a constant weight and then weighed. The samples were then ground and dissolved in 3 mL methanol (99%) in dark condition, for 1 h, at room temperature. The extracts were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm (7000 ×g) for 5 min and the supernatant (~2.7 mL) was stored at −80°C. All the chemicals used were of analytical/HPLC grade bought from Sigma-Aldrich (Cairo, Egypt). The fungal and bacterial strains were procured from the Departments of Plant Pathology and Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria, Egypt.


### 2.3. HPLC-DAD Analyses

The plant materials that were dried by lyophilization (Labconco, USA) were powdered using a mortar. The plant samples of 0.2 g each were extracted following the procedure described by Szopa et al. [36]. The methanolic extracts were subjected to chromatographic analyses by a modified validated HPLC method [37–39]. Quantification was carried out by comparing the UV-DAD spectra and tr values with that of the commercially available standards of the following groups of metabolites: free phenolic acids (3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic, caffeic, chlorogenic,o-coumaric,m-coumaric,p-coumaric, ferulic, gallic, gentisic, hydrocaffeic,p-hydroxybenzoic, isoferulic, neochlorogenic, protocatechuic, rosmarinic, salicylic, sinapic, syringic, and vanillic acids; and precursors of phenolic acids: cinnamic and benzoic acids), flavonoids (aglycones: kaempferol, luteolin, myricetin, quercetin, and rhamnetin; glycosides: apigetrin, cynaroside, hyperoside, isoquercetin, quercitrin, robinin, rutin, trifolin, and vitexin), coumarins (bergapten, esculin, 6-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin, imperatorin, isopimpinellin, marmesin, psoralen, umbelliferone, and xanthotoxin), catechins (epicatechin, epicatechin gallate, epigallocatechin, and epigallocatechin gallate), and phenolic compound biosynthetic precursors (phenylalanine and tyrosine) (the compounds were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). An HPLC-DAD (Merck-Hitachi) and a Purospher® RP-18e analytical column (4 × 250 mm, 5 mL; Merck) were used for the analyses. The gradient program used included the flow rate of 1 mL/min, injection volume of 10 μL, and detection wavelength of 254 nm [36, 40, 41]. The representative chromatograms have been provided as Supplementary Figures 1 and 2.


### 2.4. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activities of all the samples were determined by DPPH andβ-carotene-linoleic acid assays [9]. In the DPPH method, the absorbance was measured at 517 nm, following 30 min of treatment. In the β-carotene-linoleic acid assay, the absorbance was measured at 470 nm. The sample concentration required to scavenge 50% of the DPPH/β-carotene-linoleic acid (IC50 in μg/mL) was determined by plotting the inhibition percent against extract concentration. Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was used as a positive control. The antioxidant activity of each sample was compared with that of the BHT and blank. Experiments were repeated twice in triplicate.


### 2.5. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of plant extracts was screened against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, includingListeria monocytogenes (clinical isolate),Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538),Bacillus cereus (ATCC 14579),Micrococcus flavus (ATCC 10240).Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), andEscherichia coli (ATCC 35210). The microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the plant extracts [42]. The 96-well microtiter plates were used, and each well of the plate contained known concentration of plant extracts + 100 μL tryptic soy broth containing bacterial inoculum (1.0 × 104 CFU per well). These plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h in a rotary shaker and the MICs and MBCs were determined after the incubation period. The lowest concentration of plant extract that exhibited no visible growth (observed under a binocular microscope) was defined as the MIC. The MBC was determined using serial subculturing of the 2 μL plant extracts into microtiter plates containing 100 μL of TSB in each well. The microtiter plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The MBC was defined as the lowest concentration that caused no visible growth which indicated killing of 99.5% of the inoculum. The optical density was determined at 655 nm and all the experiments were performed twice in triplicate. Positive (streptomycin, 0.01–10 mg/mL) and negative (DMSO, 5%) controls were also used.


### 2.6. Antifungal Activity

Several fungi, includingAspergillus flavus (ATCC 9643),A. ochraceus (ATCC 12066),A. niger (ATCC 6275),Penicillium ochrochloron (ATCC 48663),P. funiculosum (ATCC 56755), andCandida albicans (ATCC 12066), were used to test the antifungal activity of leaf extracts using the microdilution method [42]. Known concentrations of each leaf extract (2 μL) were added to microtiter plates (with a capacity of 96 wells) with each well containing broth Malt medium mixed with each fugal inoculum (spore suspension concentration of 1.0 × 105). The microtiter plates were incubated at 28°C for 72 h in a rotary shaker. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were calculated as the lowest concentration that inhibited fungal growth at the binocular microscopic level. The minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) were calculated using a serial subcultivations of the leaf extracts (2 μL) added to microtiter plates that contained 100 μL of broth and inoculums and then incubated at 28°C for 72 h. The MFC was defined as the minimum concentration that caused no visible growth which indicated the killing of 99.5% of the original inoculum. The ketoconazole (KTZ) (1–3500 μg/mL) was used as a positive control. All experiments were repeated twice in triplicate.


### 2.7. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0, and the results were analyzed by least significance difference (LSD) in the ANOVA.


## 2.1. Plant Material

The leaves, fruits, and tubers ofA. aethiopicus L. (A. sprengeri Regel) and leaves of bothG. pillansii L. Haw andK. delagoensis L. were obtained from the Department of Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture Nursery in El-Shatby, Alexandria. The fruit coat and flesh with seeds ofC. colocynthis L., leaves ofC.citratus (DC). Stapf, and pods ofS. alexandrina Mill were obtained from commercial farms in Alexandria Governorate in northern Egypt. Further, the seeds ofB. juncea L. and roots ofC. longa L. were procured from a local herbalist. All the plants were identified by Dr. H. Elansary and vouchered at the Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria, in June 2017.


## 2.2. Bioactivity Assays

To determine the bioactivity of the samples, the total dry weight was determined by drying the cleaned plant parts (0.25 mg) in an oven at 35°C to reach a constant weight and then weighed. The samples were then ground and dissolved in 3 mL methanol (99%) in dark condition, for 1 h, at room temperature. The extracts were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm (7000 ×g) for 5 min and the supernatant (~2.7 mL) was stored at −80°C. All the chemicals used were of analytical/HPLC grade bought from Sigma-Aldrich (Cairo, Egypt). The fungal and bacterial strains were procured from the Departments of Plant Pathology and Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria, Egypt.


## 2.3. HPLC-DAD Analyses

The plant materials that were dried by lyophilization (Labconco, USA) were powdered using a mortar. The plant samples of 0.2 g each were extracted following the procedure described by Szopa et al. [36]. The methanolic extracts were subjected to chromatographic analyses by a modified validated HPLC method [37–39]. Quantification was carried out by comparing the UV-DAD spectra and tr values with that of the commercially available standards of the following groups of metabolites: free phenolic acids (3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic, caffeic, chlorogenic,o-coumaric,m-coumaric,p-coumaric, ferulic, gallic, gentisic, hydrocaffeic,p-hydroxybenzoic, isoferulic, neochlorogenic, protocatechuic, rosmarinic, salicylic, sinapic, syringic, and vanillic acids; and precursors of phenolic acids: cinnamic and benzoic acids), flavonoids (aglycones: kaempferol, luteolin, myricetin, quercetin, and rhamnetin; glycosides: apigetrin, cynaroside, hyperoside, isoquercetin, quercitrin, robinin, rutin, trifolin, and vitexin), coumarins (bergapten, esculin, 6-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin, imperatorin, isopimpinellin, marmesin, psoralen, umbelliferone, and xanthotoxin), catechins (epicatechin, epicatechin gallate, epigallocatechin, and epigallocatechin gallate), and phenolic compound biosynthetic precursors (phenylalanine and tyrosine) (the compounds were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). An HPLC-DAD (Merck-Hitachi) and a Purospher® RP-18e analytical column (4 × 250 mm, 5 mL; Merck) were used for the analyses. The gradient program used included the flow rate of 1 mL/min, injection volume of 10 μL, and detection wavelength of 254 nm [36, 40, 41]. The representative chromatograms have been provided as Supplementary Figures 1 and 2.


## 2.4. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activities of all the samples were determined by DPPH andβ-carotene-linoleic acid assays [9]. In the DPPH method, the absorbance was measured at 517 nm, following 30 min of treatment. In the β-carotene-linoleic acid assay, the absorbance was measured at 470 nm. The sample concentration required to scavenge 50% of the DPPH/β-carotene-linoleic acid (IC50 in μg/mL) was determined by plotting the inhibition percent against extract concentration. Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was used as a positive control. The antioxidant activity of each sample was compared with that of the BHT and blank. Experiments were repeated twice in triplicate.


## 2.5. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of plant extracts was screened against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, includingListeria monocytogenes (clinical isolate),Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538),Bacillus cereus (ATCC 14579),Micrococcus flavus (ATCC 10240).Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), andEscherichia coli (ATCC 35210). The microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the plant extracts [42]. The 96-well microtiter plates were used, and each well of the plate contained known concentration of plant extracts + 100 μL tryptic soy broth containing bacterial inoculum (1.0 × 104 CFU per well). These plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h in a rotary shaker and the MICs and MBCs were determined after the incubation period. The lowest concentration of plant extract that exhibited no visible growth (observed under a binocular microscope) was defined as the MIC. The MBC was determined using serial subculturing of the 2 μL plant extracts into microtiter plates containing 100 μL of TSB in each well. The microtiter plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The MBC was defined as the lowest concentration that caused no visible growth which indicated killing of 99.5% of the inoculum. The optical density was determined at 655 nm and all the experiments were performed twice in triplicate. Positive (streptomycin, 0.01–10 mg/mL) and negative (DMSO, 5%) controls were also used.


## 2.6. Antifungal Activity

Several fungi, includingAspergillus flavus (ATCC 9643),A. ochraceus (ATCC 12066),A. niger (ATCC 6275),Penicillium ochrochloron (ATCC 48663),P. funiculosum (ATCC 56755), andCandida albicans (ATCC 12066), were used to test the antifungal activity of leaf extracts using the microdilution method [42]. Known concentrations of each leaf extract (2 μL) were added to microtiter plates (with a capacity of 96 wells) with each well containing broth Malt medium mixed with each fugal inoculum (spore suspension concentration of 1.0 × 105). The microtiter plates were incubated at 28°C for 72 h in a rotary shaker. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were calculated as the lowest concentration that inhibited fungal growth at the binocular microscopic level. The minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) were calculated using a serial subcultivations of the leaf extracts (2 μL) added to microtiter plates that contained 100 μL of broth and inoculums and then incubated at 28°C for 72 h. The MFC was defined as the minimum concentration that caused no visible growth which indicated the killing of 99.5% of the original inoculum. The ketoconazole (KTZ) (1–3500 μg/mL) was used as a positive control. All experiments were repeated twice in triplicate.


## 2.7. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0, and the results were analyzed by least significance difference (LSD) in the ANOVA.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Targeted Profiling of Biologically Active Metabolites

#### 3.1.1.Asparagus aethiopicus

The HPLC-DAD analysis of fruit, leaf, and tuber extracts ofA. aethiopicus revealed the differences in the chemical composition between them (Table 1). In the fruit extracts, three phenolic acids, chlorogenic, gallic, and syringic acids, and four flavonoids, isoquercetin, quercetin, quercitrin, and robinin, were confirmed. The predominant phenolic acid was gallic acid (12.20 mg per 100 g DW), while robinin (kaempferol 3-O-robinoside-7-O-rhamnoside) (40.01 mg per 100 g DW) and quercitrin (quercetin 3-rhamnoside) (37.08 mg per 100 g DW) were the predominant flavonoids.Table 1
Chemical composition ofAsparagus aethiopicus and Citrullus colocynthis economic plant parts.
Plant part
Chemical compound
Amount [mg 100 g−1] D.W.
Asparagus aethiopicus(Fruit)
Chlorogenic acid
5.21
±
0.36
Gallic acid
12.20
±
0.06
Syringic acid
2.68
±
0.92
Quercetin
12.61
±
0.00
Quercitrin
37.08
±
0.04
Isoquercetin
7.44
±
0.04
Robinin
40.01
±
0.06
A. aethiopicus (tubers)
Chlorogenic acid
3.17
±
0.76
Gallic acid
20.33
±
0.15
Caffeic acid
62.18
±
1.03
Protocatechuic acid
8.01
±
0.01
A. aethiopicus (leaves)
Chlorogenic acid
31.72
±
4.24
Gallic acid
10.39
±
2.17
Caffeic acid
11.15
±
2.97
Vanillic acid
5.98
±
0.66
Robinin
1356.90
±
2.18
Apigenin
59.59
±
6.11
Rutin
176.33
±
0.47
Citrullus colocynthis (fruit coat)
Ferulic acid
2.02
±
0.09
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
221.46
±
3.13
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
2.26
±
0.16
Hydroxycaffeic acid
277.45
±
15.66
Caffeic acid
4.31
±
0.95
p-Coumaric acid
2.80
±
0.01
6-Hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin
58.86
±
0.23
Syringic acid
0.22
±
0.01
Phenylalanine
747.83
±
4.99
C. colocynthis (fruit flesh)
Ferulic acid
3.61
±
0.06
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
5.51
±
0.24
Hydroxycaffeic acid
117.46
±
17.16
Caffeic acid
13.36
±
2.88
p-Coumaric acid
14.47
±
2.39
C. colocynthis (Seeds)
Ferulic acid
5.76
±
0.68
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
47.08
±
0.10
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
12.68
±
0.24
Hydroxycaffeic acid
97.25
±
0.93
Caffeic acid
4.18
±
0.09
p-Coumaric acid
2.83
±
0.30
Protocatechuic acid
2.25
±
0.01
Syringic acid
0.43
±
0.05
Phenylalanine
120.78
±
1.47In the leaf extracts, four phenolic acids were detected, including caffeic, chlorogenic, gallic, and vanillic acids, with chlorogenic acid (31.72 mg per 100 g DW) being the most abundant. In the leaf extract relatively high amounts of robinin (1356.90 mg per 100 g DW), rutin (176.33 mg per 100 g DW), and apigenin (59.59 mg per 100 g DW) were confirmed, as well.The phenolic profile of tuber extract was relatively poor and revealed four phenolic acids, of which three were similar to those of the leaf extracts (caffeic, chlorogenic, and gallic acids), in addition to protocatechuic acid. Relatively high amounts of caffeic acid (62.18 mg per 100 g DW) and gallic acid (20.33 mg per 100 g DW) were observed.


#### 3.1.2.Citrullus colocynthis

The extracts ofC. colocynthis fruit parts (fruit coat, fruit flesh, and seeds) exhibited similarity in their phenolic profiles (Table 2). Five similar phenolic acids were quantified, including caffeic,p-coumaric, ferulic,p-hydroxybenzoic, and hydroxycaffeic acids. The hydroxycaffeic acid was the predominant compound (277.45, 117.46, and 97.25 mg per 100 g DW in the fruit coat, fruit flesh, and seed extracts, resp.). Further, the fruit coat and seed extracts contained relatively high amounts of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (221.46 and 47.08 mg per 100 g DW, resp.) and trace amounts of syringic acid (0.22 and 0.43 mg per 100 g DW). In addition to these, the biosynthetic precursor of phenolic compounds, phenylalanine (747.83 and 120.78 mg per 100 g DW, resp., in the fruit coat and seed extracts) was detected in considerable amount.Table 2
Chemical composition ofSenna alexandrina, Brassica juncea, and Curcuma longaeconomic plant parts.
Plant part
Chemical compound
Amount [mg 100 g−1] D.W.
Senna alexandrina  (pods or fruits)
Gallic acid
15.94 ± 0.64
Gentisic acid
363.21 ± 18.64
Caffeic acid
13.34 ± 0.51
Neochlorogenic acid
65.15 ± 3.72
Protocatechuic acid
31.52 ± 1.86
Syringic acid
5.88 ± 0.23
Vanillic acid
5.06 ± 0.09
Epigallocatechin
187.50 ± 0.20
Benzoic acid
369.15 ± 15.89
6-Hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin
62.72 ± 3.70
Cynaroside
73.28 ± 2.82
Kaempferol
137.74 ± 0.52
Quercetin
80.06 ± 3.20
Isoquercetin
195.15 ± 7.41
Luteolin
22.81 ± 1.34
Rhamnetin
291.30 ± 8.73
Psoralene
20.93 ± 0.27
Isorhamnetin
51.31 ± 0.99
Brassica juncea (seeds)
Chlorogenic acid
45.03 ± 4.53
Gallic acid
9.14 ± 0.06
Ferulic acid
9.49 ± 0.11
Caffeic acid
5.21 ± 0.31
Neochlorogenic acid
18.60 ± 0.02
Syringic acid
2.04 ± 0.22
Vanillic acid
4.46 ± 0.08
Esculin
294.90 ± 0.63
Umbelliferone
277.27 ± 9.69
Sinapic acid
5.13 ± 4.32
Epigallocatechin
45.12 ± 0.03
Curcuma longa L. (roots)
Ferulic acid
15.04 ± 1.49
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
33.26 ± 0.51
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
2.77 ± 0.39
Hydroxycaffeic acid
64.40 ± 1.60
p-Coumaric acid
8.11 ± 2.62
Protocatechuic acid
2.93 ± 0.03
Syringic acid
2.22 ± 0.01


#### 3.1.3.Cymbopogon citratus,Gasteria pillansii, andKalanchoe delagoensis

The phenolic profiles of the economically important part (leaves) ofC. citratus,G. pillansii andK. delagoensis were determined (Table 3). The leaf extract ofC. citratus revealed seven phenolic compounds, including one flavonoid (rutin, 155.52 mg per 100 g DW). The amounts of phenolic acids were relatively high, with chlorogenic (49.98 mg per 100 g DW) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (60.21 mg per 100 g DW) being the predominant ones. The biosynthetic precursor of phenolic acids (cinnamic acid, 50.44 mg per 100 g DW) was also found in relatively high amounts.Table 3
Chemical composition ofCymbopogon citratus, Gasteria pillansii, and Kalanchoe delagoensis economic plant parts.
Plant part
Chemical compound
Amount [mg 100 g−1] D.W.
Cymbopogon citratus (leaves)
Chlorogenic acid
49.98 ± 0.62
Cinnamic acid
50.44 ± 0.03
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
60.21 ± 0.60
Caffeic acid
8.74 ± 0.02
Protocatechuic acid
4.36 ± 0.02
Vanillic acid
2.95 ± 0.03
Rutin
155.52 ± 0.32
Gasteria pillansii/G. maculata (leaves)
Cinnamic acid
4.80 ± 1.23
Ferulic acid
67.62 ± 2.25
Gallic acid
15.04 ± 0.01
Ferulic acid
27.15 ± 0.05
p-Coumaric acid
14.11 ± 5.54
Quercetin
65.81 ± 4.50
Isoquercetin
8.04 ± 0.89
Quercitrin
83.08 ± 11.05
Rutin
41.83 ± 5.04
Kalanchoe delagoensisL.orBryophyllum delagoenseL. (leaves)
Ferulic acid
25.92 ± 0.12
Gallic acid
152.21 ± 0.45
Caffeic acid
65.28 ± 0.71
Protocatechuic acid
32.38 ± 0.11
Syringic acid
11.90 ± 0.62
Trifoline
873.63 ± 2.82
Kaempferol-7 o-rhamnoside
47.65 ± 0.42
Kaempferol
207.41 ± 0.94
Quercetin
89.86 ± 1.49
Isoquercetin
120.58 ± 1.01
Robinin
125.69 ± 1.98
Quercitrin
155.65 ± 0.88The phenolic profile ofG. pillansii leaf extracts contained several phenolic acids such asp-coumaric (14.11 mg per 100 g DW), ferulic (67.62 mg per 100 g DW), and gallic (15.04 mg per 100 g DW) acids, including their biosynthetic precursor, cinnamic acid (4.80 mg per 100 g DW). In the leaf extracts ofG. pillansii, relatively high amounts of quercitrin (83.08 mg per 100 g DW) and quercetin (65.81 mg per 100 g DW) were confirmed, in addition to the other flavonoids, isoquercetin, and rutin.The leaf extracts ofK. delagoensis contained relatively high amounts of phenolic acids and flavonoids. Five phenolic acids were detected in significant amounts, including gallic acid (152.21 mg per 100 g DW) and caffeic acid (65.28 mg per 100 g DW). High amounts of the flavonoids such as trifolin (kaempferol 3-galactoside) (873.63 mg per 100 g DW), kaempferol (207.41 mg per 100 g DW), isoquercetin (120.58 mg per 100 g DW), and quercitrin (89.86 mg per 100 g DW) were detected.


#### 3.1.4.Brassica juncea

The seed extracts ofB. juncea revealed the presence of phenolic acids, coumarins, and epigallocatechin (Table 4). The predominant phenolic acids included chlorogenic acid (45.03 mg per 100 g DW) and its isomer, neochlorogenic acid (18.60 mg per 100 g DW). Other phenolic acids (caffeic, ferulic, gallic, sinapic, syringic, and vanillic acids) were also quantified; however, they were in relatively low amounts (<10 mg per 100 g DW). In the seed extracts, two coumarins, esculin (294.90 mg per 100 g DW) and umbelliferone (277.27 mg per 100 g DW), were confirmed.Table 4
DPPH andβ-carotene-linoleic acid assay of A. aethiopicus, C. colocynthis, S. alexandrina, B. juncea, C. longa, C. citratus, G. pillansii,andK. delagoensismethanolic extracts. Values are expressed as mean of triplicate determinations ± sd.
DPPH free radical scavenging activity (IC50, μg mL−1)
β-Carotene-linoleic acid assay (IC50, μg mL−1)
Asparagus aethiopicus (leaves)
3.1 ± 0.1
2.7 ± 0.1
Asparagus aethiopicus (fruit)
8.4 ± 0.1
9.9 ± 0.1
Asparagus aethiopicus (tubers)
8.1 ± 0.1
9.5 ± 0.1
Citrullus colocynthis (fruit coat)
2.4 ± 0.1
2.3 ± 0.1
Citrullus colocynthis (fruit flesh)
6.5 ± 0.2
7.8 ± 0.3
Citrullus colocynthis seeds
7.8 ± 0.1
8.9 ± 0.3
Senna alexandrina (pods or fruit)
2.6 ± 0.1
2.4 ± 0.1
Brassica juncea (seeds)
5.4 ± 0.1
6.2 ± 0.1
Curcuma longa L. (roots)
7.3 ± 0.3
8.2 ± 0.1
Cymbopogon citratus (leaves)
8.3 ± 0.3
9.4 ± 0.3
Gasteria pillansii (leaves)
5.4 ± 0.1
6.5 ± 0.1
Kalanchoe delagoense L. (leaves)
4.1 ± 0.1
4.9 ± 0.1
BHT
2.9 ± 0.2
2.6 ± 0.1


#### 3.1.5.Curcuma longa

The chromatographic analysis of theC. longa root extracts revealed the presence of seven phenolic aids, includingp-coumaric, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic, ferulic,p-hydroxybenzoic, hydroxycaffeic, protocatechuic, and syringic acids. The predominant compounds were hydroxycaffeic acid (64.40 mg per 100 g DW), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (33.26 mg per 100 g DW), and ferulic acid (15.04 mg per 100 g DW).


#### 3.1.6.Senna alexandrina

The pod extractof S. alexandrina contained three groups of secondary metabolites, including phenolic acids, flavonoids, and coumarins (Table 6). The precursor of the phenolic acids, benzoic acid, was quantified in relatively high amount (369.15 mg per 100 g DW). Also, seven phenolic acids (caffeic, gallic, gentisic, neochlorogenic, protocatechuic, syringic, and vanillic acids) were detected. High amounts of gentisic acid (363.21 mg per 100 g DW), neochlorogenic acid (65.15 mg per 100 g DW), and protocatechuic acid (31.52 mg 100 g DW) were detected.Furthermore, seven flavonoids (cynaroside, isoquercetin, isorhamnetin, kaempferol, luteolin, quercetin, and rhamnetin) were detected in relatively high amounts ranging from 22.81 to 291.30 mg per 100 g DW. The predominant compounds were rhamnetin (291.30 mg per 100 g DW), isoquercetin (195.15 mg per 100 g DW), and kaempferol (137.74 mg per 100 g DW). In theS. alexandrina pod extracts, two coumarins, 6-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin (62.72 mg per 100 g DW) and psoralene (20.93 mg per 100 g DW), were also detected.


### 3.2. Antioxidant Activities

Methanolic extracts of the leaves were subjected to DPPH andβ-carotene-linoleic acid assays, and the results are presented in Table 4. The antioxidant activities expressed as IC50 ranged from 2.4 to 8.4 μg/mL and 2.3 to 9.9 μg/mL in the DPPH and β-carotene-linoleic acid assays, respectively.Relatively high antioxidant activities (low IC50, μg/mL) was exhibited byC. colocynthis fruit coat (DPPH = 2.4;β-carotene = 2.3),S. alexandrina pods (DPPH = 2.6;β-carotene = 2.4), andA. aethiopicus leaves (DPPH = 3.1;β-carotene = 2.7). They showed higher antioxidant activities than that of the BHT standard. Other plant samples ofK. delagoensis,G. pillansii, andB. juncea revealed moderate antioxidant activities. Relatively low antioxidant activities were observed inA. aethiopicus fruits and tubers,C. colocynthis fruit flesh and seeds,C. longa roots, andC. citratus leaves. Both the assays followed a similar pattern in their values for the antioxidant activities.


### 3.3. Antibacterial Activities

The plant parts showed great variation in the antibacterial activities, expressed as MIC and MBC, of their methanolic extracts (Table5). The MIC and MBC ranged from 0.02 to 0.43 mg/mL and 0.4 to 0.73 mg/mL, respectively. The pods ofS. alexandrina,C. colocynthis fruit coat, andA. aethiopicus leaves revealed relatively high antibacterial activities, with relatively low MIC and MBC compared to streptomycin. The fruit flesh and seeds ofC. colocynthis showed moderate to high antibacterial activities against bacteria, such asP. aeruginosa,E. coli,M. flavus, andS. aureus. The seeds ofB. juncea and roots ofC. longa revealed high to moderate antibacterial activities when compared with other plants. The tubers ofA. aethiopicus exhibited relatively low antibacterial activity against most organisms.Table 5
Minimum inhibitory (MIC) and bactericidal concentration (MBC) ofA. aethiopicus, C. colocynthis, S. alexandrina, B. juncea, C. longa, C. citratus, G. pillansii,andK. delagoensismethanolic extracts (mg mL−1).
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Bacillus cereus
Listeria monocytogenes
Escherichia coli
Micrococcus flavus
Staphylococcus aureus
MIC
MIC
MIC
MIC
MIC
MIC
MBC
MBC
MBC
MBC
MBC
MBC
Asparagus aethiopicus(leaves)
0.04 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.08 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.07 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.03
0.26 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.03
Asparagus aethiopicus(fruit)
0.08 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.36 ± 0.01
0.36 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.02
0.57 ± 0.03
0.63 ± 0.02
0.77 ± 0.02
0.85 ± 0.03
0.57 ± 0.03
Asparagus aethiopicus(tubers)
0.07 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.27 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.01
0.31 ± 0.01
0.14 ± 0.01
0.57 ± 0.03
0.56 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.01
0.48 ± 0.03
0.73 ± 0.03
Citrullus colocynthis(fruit coat)
0.03 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.14 ± 0.01
0.08 ± 0.01
0.10 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.01
0.06 ± 0.01
0.38 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.03
0.17 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.42 ± 0.03
Citrullus colocynthis(fruit flesh)
0.04 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.01
0.23 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
0.08 ± 0.03
0.41 ± 0.03
0.47 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.03
0.41 ± 0.03
Citrullus colocynthis Seeds
0.05 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.27 ± 0.01
0.10 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.02
0.11 ± 0.02
0.10 ± 0.01
0.28 ± 0.03
0.49 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.37 ± 0.03
0.19 ± 0.03
Senna alexandrina (pods or fruit)
0.02 ± 0.01
0.06 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.09 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.06 ± 0.01
0.04 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.29 ± 0.03
0.18 ± 0.03
0.22 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
Brassica juncea (seeds)
0.04 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.02
0.27 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.02
0.18 ± 0.02
0.07 ± 0.01
0.42 ± 0.03
0.48 ± 0.01
0.37 ± 0.01
0.23 ± 0.03
0.45 ± 0.03
Curcuma longa L. (roots)
0.04 ± 0.01
0.07 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.14 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.02
0.19 ± 0.02
0.08 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.00
0.43 ± 0.01
0.32 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.36 ± 0.03
Cymbopogon citratus (leaves)
0.09 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.02
0.25 ± 0.02
0.17 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.03
0.41 ± 0.01
0.41 ± 0.01
0.27 ± 0.01
0.47 ± 0.01
Gasteria pillansii (leaves)
0.05 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.09 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.01
0.51 ± 0.01
0.31 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.01
Kalanchoe delagoense L. (leaves)
0.09 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.16 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.01
0.28 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.37 ± 0.03
Streptomycin
0.07 ± 0.01
0.08 ± 0.03
0.15 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.16 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.03
0.29 ± 0.03
0.23 ± 0.02
0.35 ± 0.01Table 6
Minimum inhibitory (MIC) and fungicidal concentration (MFC) ofA. aethiopicus, C. colocynthis, S. alexandrina, B. juncea, C. longa, C. citratus, G. pillansii,andK. delagoensismethanolic extracts (mg mL−1).
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus ochraceus
Aspergillus niger
Candida albicans
Penicillium funiculosum
Penicillium ochrochloron
MIC
MIC
MIC
MIC
MIC
MIC
MFC
MFC
MFC
MFC
MFC
MFC
Asparagus aethiopicus(leaves)
0.10 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.09 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.03
0.18 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.02
0.27 ± 0.03
0.31 ± 0.03
Asparagus aethiopicus(fruit)
0.21 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.01
0.67 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.03
0.75 ± 0.01
0.52 ± 0.01
0.45 ± 0.03
0.45 ± 0.03
Asparagus aethiopicus(tubers)
0.33 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.27 ± 0.01
0.72 ± 0.01
0.68 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.01
0.81 ± 0.01
0.53 ± 0.03
0.58 ± 0.03
Citrullus colocynthis(fruit coat)
0.08 ± 0.01
0.09 ± 0.01
0.10 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.14 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.31 ± 0.01
0.31 ± 0.01
Citrullus colocynthis(fruit flesh)
0.20 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.01
0.41 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.03
0.40 ± 0.03
0.36 ± 0.03
0.45 ± 0.03
Citrullus colocynthis Seeds
0.23 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.02
0.15 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.02
0.19 ± 0.01
0.49 ± 0.01
0.52 ± 0.03
0.31 ± 0.01
0.38 ± 0.01
0.38 ± 0.03
0.37 ± 0.03
Senna alexandrina (pods or fruit)
0.09 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.08 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.00
0.16 ± 0.03
0.23 ± 0.03
0.43 ± 0.03
0.31 ± 0.01
Brassica juncea (seeds)
0.19 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.23 ± 0.01
0.40 ± 0.01
0.31 ± 0.03
0.25 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.03
0.31 ± 0.03
0.47 ± 0.03
Curcuma longa L. (roots)
0.10 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.02
0.13 ± 0.01
0.16 ± 0.01
0.16 ± 0.01
0.28 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.03
0.57 ± 0.03
Cymbopogon citratus (leaves)
0.20 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
0.40 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.03
0.23 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.03
0.41 ± 0.03
0.40 ± 0.03
Gasteria pillansii (leaves)
0.25 ± 0.01
0.10 ± 0.02
0.14 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.02
0.27 ± 0.01
0.57 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.01
0.55 ± 0.01
0.56 ± 0.03
0.63 ± 0.03
Kalanchoe delagoense L. (leaves)
0.21 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.41 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.03
0.29 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.03
0.43 ± 0.03
0.51 ± 0.03
KTZ
0.22 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.03
0.19 ± 0.01
2.01 ± 0.11
0.20 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.01
0.41 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.00
0.41 ± 0.03
3.63 ± 0.01
0.41 ± 0.03


### 3.4. Antifungal Activities

The antifungal activities of methanolic extracts were expressed as MIC and MFC (Table6). The MIC and MFC values ranged from 0.08 to 0.33 mg/mL and 0.16 to 0.75 mg/mL, respectively. The fruit coat ofC. colocynthis, pods ofS. alexandrina, and leaves ofA. aethiopicus showed relatively high antifungal activities in general with low MIC and MBC values compared to the standard reagent. The other plant extracts, such asC. colocynthis fruit flesh and seeds,B. juncea seeds, andC. longa roots, exhibited moderate antifungal activities.


## 3.1. Targeted Profiling of Biologically Active Metabolites

### 3.1.1.Asparagus aethiopicus

The HPLC-DAD analysis of fruit, leaf, and tuber extracts ofA. aethiopicus revealed the differences in the chemical composition between them (Table 1). In the fruit extracts, three phenolic acids, chlorogenic, gallic, and syringic acids, and four flavonoids, isoquercetin, quercetin, quercitrin, and robinin, were confirmed. The predominant phenolic acid was gallic acid (12.20 mg per 100 g DW), while robinin (kaempferol 3-O-robinoside-7-O-rhamnoside) (40.01 mg per 100 g DW) and quercitrin (quercetin 3-rhamnoside) (37.08 mg per 100 g DW) were the predominant flavonoids.Table 1
Chemical composition ofAsparagus aethiopicus and Citrullus colocynthis economic plant parts.
Plant part
Chemical compound
Amount [mg 100 g−1] D.W.
Asparagus aethiopicus(Fruit)
Chlorogenic acid
5.21
±
0.36
Gallic acid
12.20
±
0.06
Syringic acid
2.68
±
0.92
Quercetin
12.61
±
0.00
Quercitrin
37.08
±
0.04
Isoquercetin
7.44
±
0.04
Robinin
40.01
±
0.06
A. aethiopicus (tubers)
Chlorogenic acid
3.17
±
0.76
Gallic acid
20.33
±
0.15
Caffeic acid
62.18
±
1.03
Protocatechuic acid
8.01
±
0.01
A. aethiopicus (leaves)
Chlorogenic acid
31.72
±
4.24
Gallic acid
10.39
±
2.17
Caffeic acid
11.15
±
2.97
Vanillic acid
5.98
±
0.66
Robinin
1356.90
±
2.18
Apigenin
59.59
±
6.11
Rutin
176.33
±
0.47
Citrullus colocynthis (fruit coat)
Ferulic acid
2.02
±
0.09
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
221.46
±
3.13
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
2.26
±
0.16
Hydroxycaffeic acid
277.45
±
15.66
Caffeic acid
4.31
±
0.95
p-Coumaric acid
2.80
±
0.01
6-Hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin
58.86
±
0.23
Syringic acid
0.22
±
0.01
Phenylalanine
747.83
±
4.99
C. colocynthis (fruit flesh)
Ferulic acid
3.61
±
0.06
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
5.51
±
0.24
Hydroxycaffeic acid
117.46
±
17.16
Caffeic acid
13.36
±
2.88
p-Coumaric acid
14.47
±
2.39
C. colocynthis (Seeds)
Ferulic acid
5.76
±
0.68
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
47.08
±
0.10
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
12.68
±
0.24
Hydroxycaffeic acid
97.25
±
0.93
Caffeic acid
4.18
±
0.09
p-Coumaric acid
2.83
±
0.30
Protocatechuic acid
2.25
±
0.01
Syringic acid
0.43
±
0.05
Phenylalanine
120.78
±
1.47In the leaf extracts, four phenolic acids were detected, including caffeic, chlorogenic, gallic, and vanillic acids, with chlorogenic acid (31.72 mg per 100 g DW) being the most abundant. In the leaf extract relatively high amounts of robinin (1356.90 mg per 100 g DW), rutin (176.33 mg per 100 g DW), and apigenin (59.59 mg per 100 g DW) were confirmed, as well.The phenolic profile of tuber extract was relatively poor and revealed four phenolic acids, of which three were similar to those of the leaf extracts (caffeic, chlorogenic, and gallic acids), in addition to protocatechuic acid. Relatively high amounts of caffeic acid (62.18 mg per 100 g DW) and gallic acid (20.33 mg per 100 g DW) were observed.


### 3.1.2.Citrullus colocynthis

The extracts ofC. colocynthis fruit parts (fruit coat, fruit flesh, and seeds) exhibited similarity in their phenolic profiles (Table 2). Five similar phenolic acids were quantified, including caffeic,p-coumaric, ferulic,p-hydroxybenzoic, and hydroxycaffeic acids. The hydroxycaffeic acid was the predominant compound (277.45, 117.46, and 97.25 mg per 100 g DW in the fruit coat, fruit flesh, and seed extracts, resp.). Further, the fruit coat and seed extracts contained relatively high amounts of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (221.46 and 47.08 mg per 100 g DW, resp.) and trace amounts of syringic acid (0.22 and 0.43 mg per 100 g DW). In addition to these, the biosynthetic precursor of phenolic compounds, phenylalanine (747.83 and 120.78 mg per 100 g DW, resp., in the fruit coat and seed extracts) was detected in considerable amount.Table 2
Chemical composition ofSenna alexandrina, Brassica juncea, and Curcuma longaeconomic plant parts.
Plant part
Chemical compound
Amount [mg 100 g−1] D.W.
Senna alexandrina  (pods or fruits)
Gallic acid
15.94 ± 0.64
Gentisic acid
363.21 ± 18.64
Caffeic acid
13.34 ± 0.51
Neochlorogenic acid
65.15 ± 3.72
Protocatechuic acid
31.52 ± 1.86
Syringic acid
5.88 ± 0.23
Vanillic acid
5.06 ± 0.09
Epigallocatechin
187.50 ± 0.20
Benzoic acid
369.15 ± 15.89
6-Hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin
62.72 ± 3.70
Cynaroside
73.28 ± 2.82
Kaempferol
137.74 ± 0.52
Quercetin
80.06 ± 3.20
Isoquercetin
195.15 ± 7.41
Luteolin
22.81 ± 1.34
Rhamnetin
291.30 ± 8.73
Psoralene
20.93 ± 0.27
Isorhamnetin
51.31 ± 0.99
Brassica juncea (seeds)
Chlorogenic acid
45.03 ± 4.53
Gallic acid
9.14 ± 0.06
Ferulic acid
9.49 ± 0.11
Caffeic acid
5.21 ± 0.31
Neochlorogenic acid
18.60 ± 0.02
Syringic acid
2.04 ± 0.22
Vanillic acid
4.46 ± 0.08
Esculin
294.90 ± 0.63
Umbelliferone
277.27 ± 9.69
Sinapic acid
5.13 ± 4.32
Epigallocatechin
45.12 ± 0.03
Curcuma longa L. (roots)
Ferulic acid
15.04 ± 1.49
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
33.26 ± 0.51
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
2.77 ± 0.39
Hydroxycaffeic acid
64.40 ± 1.60
p-Coumaric acid
8.11 ± 2.62
Protocatechuic acid
2.93 ± 0.03
Syringic acid
2.22 ± 0.01


### 3.1.3.Cymbopogon citratus,Gasteria pillansii, andKalanchoe delagoensis

The phenolic profiles of the economically important part (leaves) ofC. citratus,G. pillansii andK. delagoensis were determined (Table 3). The leaf extract ofC. citratus revealed seven phenolic compounds, including one flavonoid (rutin, 155.52 mg per 100 g DW). The amounts of phenolic acids were relatively high, with chlorogenic (49.98 mg per 100 g DW) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (60.21 mg per 100 g DW) being the predominant ones. The biosynthetic precursor of phenolic acids (cinnamic acid, 50.44 mg per 100 g DW) was also found in relatively high amounts.Table 3
Chemical composition ofCymbopogon citratus, Gasteria pillansii, and Kalanchoe delagoensis economic plant parts.
Plant part
Chemical compound
Amount [mg 100 g−1] D.W.
Cymbopogon citratus (leaves)
Chlorogenic acid
49.98 ± 0.62
Cinnamic acid
50.44 ± 0.03
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
60.21 ± 0.60
Caffeic acid
8.74 ± 0.02
Protocatechuic acid
4.36 ± 0.02
Vanillic acid
2.95 ± 0.03
Rutin
155.52 ± 0.32
Gasteria pillansii/G. maculata (leaves)
Cinnamic acid
4.80 ± 1.23
Ferulic acid
67.62 ± 2.25
Gallic acid
15.04 ± 0.01
Ferulic acid
27.15 ± 0.05
p-Coumaric acid
14.11 ± 5.54
Quercetin
65.81 ± 4.50
Isoquercetin
8.04 ± 0.89
Quercitrin
83.08 ± 11.05
Rutin
41.83 ± 5.04
Kalanchoe delagoensisL.orBryophyllum delagoenseL. (leaves)
Ferulic acid
25.92 ± 0.12
Gallic acid
152.21 ± 0.45
Caffeic acid
65.28 ± 0.71
Protocatechuic acid
32.38 ± 0.11
Syringic acid
11.90 ± 0.62
Trifoline
873.63 ± 2.82
Kaempferol-7 o-rhamnoside
47.65 ± 0.42
Kaempferol
207.41 ± 0.94
Quercetin
89.86 ± 1.49
Isoquercetin
120.58 ± 1.01
Robinin
125.69 ± 1.98
Quercitrin
155.65 ± 0.88The phenolic profile ofG. pillansii leaf extracts contained several phenolic acids such asp-coumaric (14.11 mg per 100 g DW), ferulic (67.62 mg per 100 g DW), and gallic (15.04 mg per 100 g DW) acids, including their biosynthetic precursor, cinnamic acid (4.80 mg per 100 g DW). In the leaf extracts ofG. pillansii, relatively high amounts of quercitrin (83.08 mg per 100 g DW) and quercetin (65.81 mg per 100 g DW) were confirmed, in addition to the other flavonoids, isoquercetin, and rutin.The leaf extracts ofK. delagoensis contained relatively high amounts of phenolic acids and flavonoids. Five phenolic acids were detected in significant amounts, including gallic acid (152.21 mg per 100 g DW) and caffeic acid (65.28 mg per 100 g DW). High amounts of the flavonoids such as trifolin (kaempferol 3-galactoside) (873.63 mg per 100 g DW), kaempferol (207.41 mg per 100 g DW), isoquercetin (120.58 mg per 100 g DW), and quercitrin (89.86 mg per 100 g DW) were detected.


### 3.1.4.Brassica juncea

The seed extracts ofB. juncea revealed the presence of phenolic acids, coumarins, and epigallocatechin (Table 4). The predominant phenolic acids included chlorogenic acid (45.03 mg per 100 g DW) and its isomer, neochlorogenic acid (18.60 mg per 100 g DW). Other phenolic acids (caffeic, ferulic, gallic, sinapic, syringic, and vanillic acids) were also quantified; however, they were in relatively low amounts (<10 mg per 100 g DW). In the seed extracts, two coumarins, esculin (294.90 mg per 100 g DW) and umbelliferone (277.27 mg per 100 g DW), were confirmed.Table 4
DPPH andβ-carotene-linoleic acid assay of A. aethiopicus, C. colocynthis, S. alexandrina, B. juncea, C. longa, C. citratus, G. pillansii,andK. delagoensismethanolic extracts. Values are expressed as mean of triplicate determinations ± sd.
DPPH free radical scavenging activity (IC50, μg mL−1)
β-Carotene-linoleic acid assay (IC50, μg mL−1)
Asparagus aethiopicus (leaves)
3.1 ± 0.1
2.7 ± 0.1
Asparagus aethiopicus (fruit)
8.4 ± 0.1
9.9 ± 0.1
Asparagus aethiopicus (tubers)
8.1 ± 0.1
9.5 ± 0.1
Citrullus colocynthis (fruit coat)
2.4 ± 0.1
2.3 ± 0.1
Citrullus colocynthis (fruit flesh)
6.5 ± 0.2
7.8 ± 0.3
Citrullus colocynthis seeds
7.8 ± 0.1
8.9 ± 0.3
Senna alexandrina (pods or fruit)
2.6 ± 0.1
2.4 ± 0.1
Brassica juncea (seeds)
5.4 ± 0.1
6.2 ± 0.1
Curcuma longa L. (roots)
7.3 ± 0.3
8.2 ± 0.1
Cymbopogon citratus (leaves)
8.3 ± 0.3
9.4 ± 0.3
Gasteria pillansii (leaves)
5.4 ± 0.1
6.5 ± 0.1
Kalanchoe delagoense L. (leaves)
4.1 ± 0.1
4.9 ± 0.1
BHT
2.9 ± 0.2
2.6 ± 0.1


### 3.1.5.Curcuma longa

The chromatographic analysis of theC. longa root extracts revealed the presence of seven phenolic aids, includingp-coumaric, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic, ferulic,p-hydroxybenzoic, hydroxycaffeic, protocatechuic, and syringic acids. The predominant compounds were hydroxycaffeic acid (64.40 mg per 100 g DW), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (33.26 mg per 100 g DW), and ferulic acid (15.04 mg per 100 g DW).


### 3.1.6.Senna alexandrina

The pod extractof S. alexandrina contained three groups of secondary metabolites, including phenolic acids, flavonoids, and coumarins (Table 6). The precursor of the phenolic acids, benzoic acid, was quantified in relatively high amount (369.15 mg per 100 g DW). Also, seven phenolic acids (caffeic, gallic, gentisic, neochlorogenic, protocatechuic, syringic, and vanillic acids) were detected. High amounts of gentisic acid (363.21 mg per 100 g DW), neochlorogenic acid (65.15 mg per 100 g DW), and protocatechuic acid (31.52 mg 100 g DW) were detected.Furthermore, seven flavonoids (cynaroside, isoquercetin, isorhamnetin, kaempferol, luteolin, quercetin, and rhamnetin) were detected in relatively high amounts ranging from 22.81 to 291.30 mg per 100 g DW. The predominant compounds were rhamnetin (291.30 mg per 100 g DW), isoquercetin (195.15 mg per 100 g DW), and kaempferol (137.74 mg per 100 g DW). In theS. alexandrina pod extracts, two coumarins, 6-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin (62.72 mg per 100 g DW) and psoralene (20.93 mg per 100 g DW), were also detected.


## 3.1.1.Asparagus aethiopicus

The HPLC-DAD analysis of fruit, leaf, and tuber extracts ofA. aethiopicus revealed the differences in the chemical composition between them (Table 1). In the fruit extracts, three phenolic acids, chlorogenic, gallic, and syringic acids, and four flavonoids, isoquercetin, quercetin, quercitrin, and robinin, were confirmed. The predominant phenolic acid was gallic acid (12.20 mg per 100 g DW), while robinin (kaempferol 3-O-robinoside-7-O-rhamnoside) (40.01 mg per 100 g DW) and quercitrin (quercetin 3-rhamnoside) (37.08 mg per 100 g DW) were the predominant flavonoids.Table 1
Chemical composition ofAsparagus aethiopicus and Citrullus colocynthis economic plant parts.
Plant part
Chemical compound
Amount [mg 100 g−1] D.W.
Asparagus aethiopicus(Fruit)
Chlorogenic acid
5.21
±
0.36
Gallic acid
12.20
±
0.06
Syringic acid
2.68
±
0.92
Quercetin
12.61
±
0.00
Quercitrin
37.08
±
0.04
Isoquercetin
7.44
±
0.04
Robinin
40.01
±
0.06
A. aethiopicus (tubers)
Chlorogenic acid
3.17
±
0.76
Gallic acid
20.33
±
0.15
Caffeic acid
62.18
±
1.03
Protocatechuic acid
8.01
±
0.01
A. aethiopicus (leaves)
Chlorogenic acid
31.72
±
4.24
Gallic acid
10.39
±
2.17
Caffeic acid
11.15
±
2.97
Vanillic acid
5.98
±
0.66
Robinin
1356.90
±
2.18
Apigenin
59.59
±
6.11
Rutin
176.33
±
0.47
Citrullus colocynthis (fruit coat)
Ferulic acid
2.02
±
0.09
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
221.46
±
3.13
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
2.26
±
0.16
Hydroxycaffeic acid
277.45
±
15.66
Caffeic acid
4.31
±
0.95
p-Coumaric acid
2.80
±
0.01
6-Hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin
58.86
±
0.23
Syringic acid
0.22
±
0.01
Phenylalanine
747.83
±
4.99
C. colocynthis (fruit flesh)
Ferulic acid
3.61
±
0.06
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
5.51
±
0.24
Hydroxycaffeic acid
117.46
±
17.16
Caffeic acid
13.36
±
2.88
p-Coumaric acid
14.47
±
2.39
C. colocynthis (Seeds)
Ferulic acid
5.76
±
0.68
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
47.08
±
0.10
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
12.68
±
0.24
Hydroxycaffeic acid
97.25
±
0.93
Caffeic acid
4.18
±
0.09
p-Coumaric acid
2.83
±
0.30
Protocatechuic acid
2.25
±
0.01
Syringic acid
0.43
±
0.05
Phenylalanine
120.78
±
1.47In the leaf extracts, four phenolic acids were detected, including caffeic, chlorogenic, gallic, and vanillic acids, with chlorogenic acid (31.72 mg per 100 g DW) being the most abundant. In the leaf extract relatively high amounts of robinin (1356.90 mg per 100 g DW), rutin (176.33 mg per 100 g DW), and apigenin (59.59 mg per 100 g DW) were confirmed, as well.The phenolic profile of tuber extract was relatively poor and revealed four phenolic acids, of which three were similar to those of the leaf extracts (caffeic, chlorogenic, and gallic acids), in addition to protocatechuic acid. Relatively high amounts of caffeic acid (62.18 mg per 100 g DW) and gallic acid (20.33 mg per 100 g DW) were observed.


## 3.1.2.Citrullus colocynthis

The extracts ofC. colocynthis fruit parts (fruit coat, fruit flesh, and seeds) exhibited similarity in their phenolic profiles (Table 2). Five similar phenolic acids were quantified, including caffeic,p-coumaric, ferulic,p-hydroxybenzoic, and hydroxycaffeic acids. The hydroxycaffeic acid was the predominant compound (277.45, 117.46, and 97.25 mg per 100 g DW in the fruit coat, fruit flesh, and seed extracts, resp.). Further, the fruit coat and seed extracts contained relatively high amounts of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (221.46 and 47.08 mg per 100 g DW, resp.) and trace amounts of syringic acid (0.22 and 0.43 mg per 100 g DW). In addition to these, the biosynthetic precursor of phenolic compounds, phenylalanine (747.83 and 120.78 mg per 100 g DW, resp., in the fruit coat and seed extracts) was detected in considerable amount.Table 2
Chemical composition ofSenna alexandrina, Brassica juncea, and Curcuma longaeconomic plant parts.
Plant part
Chemical compound
Amount [mg 100 g−1] D.W.
Senna alexandrina  (pods or fruits)
Gallic acid
15.94 ± 0.64
Gentisic acid
363.21 ± 18.64
Caffeic acid
13.34 ± 0.51
Neochlorogenic acid
65.15 ± 3.72
Protocatechuic acid
31.52 ± 1.86
Syringic acid
5.88 ± 0.23
Vanillic acid
5.06 ± 0.09
Epigallocatechin
187.50 ± 0.20
Benzoic acid
369.15 ± 15.89
6-Hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin
62.72 ± 3.70
Cynaroside
73.28 ± 2.82
Kaempferol
137.74 ± 0.52
Quercetin
80.06 ± 3.20
Isoquercetin
195.15 ± 7.41
Luteolin
22.81 ± 1.34
Rhamnetin
291.30 ± 8.73
Psoralene
20.93 ± 0.27
Isorhamnetin
51.31 ± 0.99
Brassica juncea (seeds)
Chlorogenic acid
45.03 ± 4.53
Gallic acid
9.14 ± 0.06
Ferulic acid
9.49 ± 0.11
Caffeic acid
5.21 ± 0.31
Neochlorogenic acid
18.60 ± 0.02
Syringic acid
2.04 ± 0.22
Vanillic acid
4.46 ± 0.08
Esculin
294.90 ± 0.63
Umbelliferone
277.27 ± 9.69
Sinapic acid
5.13 ± 4.32
Epigallocatechin
45.12 ± 0.03
Curcuma longa L. (roots)
Ferulic acid
15.04 ± 1.49
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
33.26 ± 0.51
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
2.77 ± 0.39
Hydroxycaffeic acid
64.40 ± 1.60
p-Coumaric acid
8.11 ± 2.62
Protocatechuic acid
2.93 ± 0.03
Syringic acid
2.22 ± 0.01


## 3.1.3.Cymbopogon citratus,Gasteria pillansii, andKalanchoe delagoensis

The phenolic profiles of the economically important part (leaves) ofC. citratus,G. pillansii andK. delagoensis were determined (Table 3). The leaf extract ofC. citratus revealed seven phenolic compounds, including one flavonoid (rutin, 155.52 mg per 100 g DW). The amounts of phenolic acids were relatively high, with chlorogenic (49.98 mg per 100 g DW) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (60.21 mg per 100 g DW) being the predominant ones. The biosynthetic precursor of phenolic acids (cinnamic acid, 50.44 mg per 100 g DW) was also found in relatively high amounts.Table 3
Chemical composition ofCymbopogon citratus, Gasteria pillansii, and Kalanchoe delagoensis economic plant parts.
Plant part
Chemical compound
Amount [mg 100 g−1] D.W.
Cymbopogon citratus (leaves)
Chlorogenic acid
49.98 ± 0.62
Cinnamic acid
50.44 ± 0.03
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
60.21 ± 0.60
Caffeic acid
8.74 ± 0.02
Protocatechuic acid
4.36 ± 0.02
Vanillic acid
2.95 ± 0.03
Rutin
155.52 ± 0.32
Gasteria pillansii/G. maculata (leaves)
Cinnamic acid
4.80 ± 1.23
Ferulic acid
67.62 ± 2.25
Gallic acid
15.04 ± 0.01
Ferulic acid
27.15 ± 0.05
p-Coumaric acid
14.11 ± 5.54
Quercetin
65.81 ± 4.50
Isoquercetin
8.04 ± 0.89
Quercitrin
83.08 ± 11.05
Rutin
41.83 ± 5.04
Kalanchoe delagoensisL.orBryophyllum delagoenseL. (leaves)
Ferulic acid
25.92 ± 0.12
Gallic acid
152.21 ± 0.45
Caffeic acid
65.28 ± 0.71
Protocatechuic acid
32.38 ± 0.11
Syringic acid
11.90 ± 0.62
Trifoline
873.63 ± 2.82
Kaempferol-7 o-rhamnoside
47.65 ± 0.42
Kaempferol
207.41 ± 0.94
Quercetin
89.86 ± 1.49
Isoquercetin
120.58 ± 1.01
Robinin
125.69 ± 1.98
Quercitrin
155.65 ± 0.88The phenolic profile ofG. pillansii leaf extracts contained several phenolic acids such asp-coumaric (14.11 mg per 100 g DW), ferulic (67.62 mg per 100 g DW), and gallic (15.04 mg per 100 g DW) acids, including their biosynthetic precursor, cinnamic acid (4.80 mg per 100 g DW). In the leaf extracts ofG. pillansii, relatively high amounts of quercitrin (83.08 mg per 100 g DW) and quercetin (65.81 mg per 100 g DW) were confirmed, in addition to the other flavonoids, isoquercetin, and rutin.The leaf extracts ofK. delagoensis contained relatively high amounts of phenolic acids and flavonoids. Five phenolic acids were detected in significant amounts, including gallic acid (152.21 mg per 100 g DW) and caffeic acid (65.28 mg per 100 g DW). High amounts of the flavonoids such as trifolin (kaempferol 3-galactoside) (873.63 mg per 100 g DW), kaempferol (207.41 mg per 100 g DW), isoquercetin (120.58 mg per 100 g DW), and quercitrin (89.86 mg per 100 g DW) were detected.


## 3.1.4.Brassica juncea

The seed extracts ofB. juncea revealed the presence of phenolic acids, coumarins, and epigallocatechin (Table 4). The predominant phenolic acids included chlorogenic acid (45.03 mg per 100 g DW) and its isomer, neochlorogenic acid (18.60 mg per 100 g DW). Other phenolic acids (caffeic, ferulic, gallic, sinapic, syringic, and vanillic acids) were also quantified; however, they were in relatively low amounts (<10 mg per 100 g DW). In the seed extracts, two coumarins, esculin (294.90 mg per 100 g DW) and umbelliferone (277.27 mg per 100 g DW), were confirmed.Table 4
DPPH andβ-carotene-linoleic acid assay of A. aethiopicus, C. colocynthis, S. alexandrina, B. juncea, C. longa, C. citratus, G. pillansii,andK. delagoensismethanolic extracts. Values are expressed as mean of triplicate determinations ± sd.
DPPH free radical scavenging activity (IC50, μg mL−1)
β-Carotene-linoleic acid assay (IC50, μg mL−1)
Asparagus aethiopicus (leaves)
3.1 ± 0.1
2.7 ± 0.1
Asparagus aethiopicus (fruit)
8.4 ± 0.1
9.9 ± 0.1
Asparagus aethiopicus (tubers)
8.1 ± 0.1
9.5 ± 0.1
Citrullus colocynthis (fruit coat)
2.4 ± 0.1
2.3 ± 0.1
Citrullus colocynthis (fruit flesh)
6.5 ± 0.2
7.8 ± 0.3
Citrullus colocynthis seeds
7.8 ± 0.1
8.9 ± 0.3
Senna alexandrina (pods or fruit)
2.6 ± 0.1
2.4 ± 0.1
Brassica juncea (seeds)
5.4 ± 0.1
6.2 ± 0.1
Curcuma longa L. (roots)
7.3 ± 0.3
8.2 ± 0.1
Cymbopogon citratus (leaves)
8.3 ± 0.3
9.4 ± 0.3
Gasteria pillansii (leaves)
5.4 ± 0.1
6.5 ± 0.1
Kalanchoe delagoense L. (leaves)
4.1 ± 0.1
4.9 ± 0.1
BHT
2.9 ± 0.2
2.6 ± 0.1


## 3.1.5.Curcuma longa

The chromatographic analysis of theC. longa root extracts revealed the presence of seven phenolic aids, includingp-coumaric, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic, ferulic,p-hydroxybenzoic, hydroxycaffeic, protocatechuic, and syringic acids. The predominant compounds were hydroxycaffeic acid (64.40 mg per 100 g DW), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (33.26 mg per 100 g DW), and ferulic acid (15.04 mg per 100 g DW).


## 3.1.6.Senna alexandrina

The pod extractof S. alexandrina contained three groups of secondary metabolites, including phenolic acids, flavonoids, and coumarins (Table 6). The precursor of the phenolic acids, benzoic acid, was quantified in relatively high amount (369.15 mg per 100 g DW). Also, seven phenolic acids (caffeic, gallic, gentisic, neochlorogenic, protocatechuic, syringic, and vanillic acids) were detected. High amounts of gentisic acid (363.21 mg per 100 g DW), neochlorogenic acid (65.15 mg per 100 g DW), and protocatechuic acid (31.52 mg 100 g DW) were detected.Furthermore, seven flavonoids (cynaroside, isoquercetin, isorhamnetin, kaempferol, luteolin, quercetin, and rhamnetin) were detected in relatively high amounts ranging from 22.81 to 291.30 mg per 100 g DW. The predominant compounds were rhamnetin (291.30 mg per 100 g DW), isoquercetin (195.15 mg per 100 g DW), and kaempferol (137.74 mg per 100 g DW). In theS. alexandrina pod extracts, two coumarins, 6-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin (62.72 mg per 100 g DW) and psoralene (20.93 mg per 100 g DW), were also detected.


## 3.2. Antioxidant Activities

Methanolic extracts of the leaves were subjected to DPPH andβ-carotene-linoleic acid assays, and the results are presented in Table 4. The antioxidant activities expressed as IC50 ranged from 2.4 to 8.4 μg/mL and 2.3 to 9.9 μg/mL in the DPPH and β-carotene-linoleic acid assays, respectively.Relatively high antioxidant activities (low IC50, μg/mL) was exhibited byC. colocynthis fruit coat (DPPH = 2.4;β-carotene = 2.3),S. alexandrina pods (DPPH = 2.6;β-carotene = 2.4), andA. aethiopicus leaves (DPPH = 3.1;β-carotene = 2.7). They showed higher antioxidant activities than that of the BHT standard. Other plant samples ofK. delagoensis,G. pillansii, andB. juncea revealed moderate antioxidant activities. Relatively low antioxidant activities were observed inA. aethiopicus fruits and tubers,C. colocynthis fruit flesh and seeds,C. longa roots, andC. citratus leaves. Both the assays followed a similar pattern in their values for the antioxidant activities.


## 3.3. Antibacterial Activities

The plant parts showed great variation in the antibacterial activities, expressed as MIC and MBC, of their methanolic extracts (Table5). The MIC and MBC ranged from 0.02 to 0.43 mg/mL and 0.4 to 0.73 mg/mL, respectively. The pods ofS. alexandrina,C. colocynthis fruit coat, andA. aethiopicus leaves revealed relatively high antibacterial activities, with relatively low MIC and MBC compared to streptomycin. The fruit flesh and seeds ofC. colocynthis showed moderate to high antibacterial activities against bacteria, such asP. aeruginosa,E. coli,M. flavus, andS. aureus. The seeds ofB. juncea and roots ofC. longa revealed high to moderate antibacterial activities when compared with other plants. The tubers ofA. aethiopicus exhibited relatively low antibacterial activity against most organisms.Table 5
Minimum inhibitory (MIC) and bactericidal concentration (MBC) ofA. aethiopicus, C. colocynthis, S. alexandrina, B. juncea, C. longa, C. citratus, G. pillansii,andK. delagoensismethanolic extracts (mg mL−1).
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Bacillus cereus
Listeria monocytogenes
Escherichia coli
Micrococcus flavus
Staphylococcus aureus
MIC
MIC
MIC
MIC
MIC
MIC
MBC
MBC
MBC
MBC
MBC
MBC
Asparagus aethiopicus(leaves)
0.04 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.08 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.07 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.03
0.26 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.03
Asparagus aethiopicus(fruit)
0.08 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.36 ± 0.01
0.36 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.02
0.57 ± 0.03
0.63 ± 0.02
0.77 ± 0.02
0.85 ± 0.03
0.57 ± 0.03
Asparagus aethiopicus(tubers)
0.07 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.27 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.01
0.31 ± 0.01
0.14 ± 0.01
0.57 ± 0.03
0.56 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.01
0.48 ± 0.03
0.73 ± 0.03
Citrullus colocynthis(fruit coat)
0.03 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.14 ± 0.01
0.08 ± 0.01
0.10 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.01
0.06 ± 0.01
0.38 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.03
0.17 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.42 ± 0.03
Citrullus colocynthis(fruit flesh)
0.04 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.01
0.23 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
0.08 ± 0.03
0.41 ± 0.03
0.47 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.03
0.41 ± 0.03
Citrullus colocynthis Seeds
0.05 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.27 ± 0.01
0.10 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.02
0.11 ± 0.02
0.10 ± 0.01
0.28 ± 0.03
0.49 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.37 ± 0.03
0.19 ± 0.03
Senna alexandrina (pods or fruit)
0.02 ± 0.01
0.06 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.09 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.06 ± 0.01
0.04 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.29 ± 0.03
0.18 ± 0.03
0.22 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
Brassica juncea (seeds)
0.04 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.02
0.27 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.02
0.18 ± 0.02
0.07 ± 0.01
0.42 ± 0.03
0.48 ± 0.01
0.37 ± 0.01
0.23 ± 0.03
0.45 ± 0.03
Curcuma longa L. (roots)
0.04 ± 0.01
0.07 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.14 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.02
0.19 ± 0.02
0.08 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.00
0.43 ± 0.01
0.32 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.36 ± 0.03
Cymbopogon citratus (leaves)
0.09 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.02
0.25 ± 0.02
0.17 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.03
0.41 ± 0.01
0.41 ± 0.01
0.27 ± 0.01
0.47 ± 0.01
Gasteria pillansii (leaves)
0.05 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.09 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.01
0.51 ± 0.01
0.31 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.01
Kalanchoe delagoense L. (leaves)
0.09 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.16 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.01
0.28 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.37 ± 0.03
Streptomycin
0.07 ± 0.01
0.08 ± 0.03
0.15 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.16 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.03
0.29 ± 0.03
0.23 ± 0.02
0.35 ± 0.01Table 6
Minimum inhibitory (MIC) and fungicidal concentration (MFC) ofA. aethiopicus, C. colocynthis, S. alexandrina, B. juncea, C. longa, C. citratus, G. pillansii,andK. delagoensismethanolic extracts (mg mL−1).
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus ochraceus
Aspergillus niger
Candida albicans
Penicillium funiculosum
Penicillium ochrochloron
MIC
MIC
MIC
MIC
MIC
MIC
MFC
MFC
MFC
MFC
MFC
MFC
Asparagus aethiopicus(leaves)
0.10 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.09 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.03
0.18 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.02
0.27 ± 0.03
0.31 ± 0.03
Asparagus aethiopicus(fruit)
0.21 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.01
0.67 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.03
0.75 ± 0.01
0.52 ± 0.01
0.45 ± 0.03
0.45 ± 0.03
Asparagus aethiopicus(tubers)
0.33 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.27 ± 0.01
0.72 ± 0.01
0.68 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.01
0.81 ± 0.01
0.53 ± 0.03
0.58 ± 0.03
Citrullus colocynthis(fruit coat)
0.08 ± 0.01
0.09 ± 0.01
0.10 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.14 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.31 ± 0.01
0.31 ± 0.01
Citrullus colocynthis(fruit flesh)
0.20 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.01
0.41 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.03
0.40 ± 0.03
0.36 ± 0.03
0.45 ± 0.03
Citrullus colocynthis Seeds
0.23 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.02
0.15 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.02
0.19 ± 0.01
0.49 ± 0.01
0.52 ± 0.03
0.31 ± 0.01
0.38 ± 0.01
0.38 ± 0.03
0.37 ± 0.03
Senna alexandrina (pods or fruit)
0.09 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.08 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.00
0.16 ± 0.03
0.23 ± 0.03
0.43 ± 0.03
0.31 ± 0.01
Brassica juncea (seeds)
0.19 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.23 ± 0.01
0.40 ± 0.01
0.31 ± 0.03
0.25 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.03
0.31 ± 0.03
0.47 ± 0.03
Curcuma longa L. (roots)
0.10 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.02
0.13 ± 0.01
0.16 ± 0.01
0.16 ± 0.01
0.28 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.03
0.57 ± 0.03
Cymbopogon citratus (leaves)
0.20 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.01
0.40 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.03
0.23 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.03
0.41 ± 0.03
0.40 ± 0.03
Gasteria pillansii (leaves)
0.25 ± 0.01
0.10 ± 0.02
0.14 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.02
0.27 ± 0.01
0.57 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.01
0.55 ± 0.01
0.56 ± 0.03
0.63 ± 0.03
Kalanchoe delagoense L. (leaves)
0.21 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.15 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.01
0.41 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.03
0.29 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.03
0.43 ± 0.03
0.51 ± 0.03
KTZ
0.22 ± 0.01
0.20 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.03
0.19 ± 0.01
2.01 ± 0.11
0.20 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.01
0.41 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.00
0.41 ± 0.03
3.63 ± 0.01
0.41 ± 0.03


## 3.4. Antifungal Activities

The antifungal activities of methanolic extracts were expressed as MIC and MFC (Table6). The MIC and MFC values ranged from 0.08 to 0.33 mg/mL and 0.16 to 0.75 mg/mL, respectively. The fruit coat ofC. colocynthis, pods ofS. alexandrina, and leaves ofA. aethiopicus showed relatively high antifungal activities in general with low MIC and MBC values compared to the standard reagent. The other plant extracts, such asC. colocynthis fruit flesh and seeds,B. juncea seeds, andC. longa roots, exhibited moderate antifungal activities.


## 4. Discussion

The extracts ofA. aethiopicus (leaves, fruits, and tubers),G. pillansii (leaves),S. alexandrina (pods),C. colocynthis (fruit coat and flesh and seeds),K. delagoensis (leaves),C. citratus (leaves),B. juncea (seeds), andC. longa (roots) revealed significant variations in their phenol profile (Tables 1–6). The major compound found in the leaves ofA. aethiopicus was the glucoside flavonoid, robinin (1356.90 mg per 100 g DW). Its concentration was significantly higher than that of all other compounds detected in the investigated samples. The sources of robinin, in nature, are limited; few investigations have detected this flavonoid in some plants, such asPueraria lobata [43]. However, the present study revealed a rich and new source of robinin, the leaves ofA. aethiopicus. Previous investigations onA. aethiopicus have isolated other flavonoids, including apigenin, apigenin-7-O-glucoside, dihydroquercetin, and naringenin, and they also reported moderate antioxidant activity of the alcoholic extract [12]. However, in the present study, 12 phenolic compounds were isolated from the leaves, fruits, and tubers, in addition to apigenin in relatively low amount in the leaves.InC. colocynthis, the fruit coat had higher phenylalanine content when compared with other extracts, including the seed and fruit flesh ofcolocynthis. A previous study has reported the presence of phenylalanine in the seeds of the IndianC. colocynthis [16]. However, the present study was the first to report six times higher phenylalanine content in the fruit coat ofC. colocynthis than that of the seeds in the Egyptian ecotype. Further, the fruit coat contained other major compounds, such as 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and hydroxycaffeic acid. The pods ofS. alexandrina contained high amounts of gentisic acid, benzoic acid, rhamnetin, isoquercetin, and kaempferol, and the presence of these compounds have not been reported. However, Franz [27] reported the presence of other glycosides, belonging to the anthraquinone family, inS. alexandrina. In the present study,B. juncea seeds contained high amounts of esculin, umbelliferone, epigallocatechin, and chlorogenic acid. A previous study conducted on the extracts of IndianB. juncea confirmed the presence of sinigrin, quercetin, vanillin, and catechin [23].The presence of phenolic compounds, such as hydroxycaffeic acid inC. longa roots; rutin, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, chlorogenic acid, and cinnamic acid inC. citratus; quercitrin, ferulic acid, and quercetin inG. pillansii; trifoline, kaempferol, quercitrin, gallic acid, and isoquercetin inK. delagoensis have not been reported before this study. However, a study onC. citratus reported the presence of specific flavonoids with anti-inflammatory activity, such as carlinoside, isoorientin, cynaroside, and luteolin [18]. Furthermore, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid is considered as a metabolite of curcumin and has been reported inC. longa [26].High antioxidant activity is usually associated with the phenols in the plants, especially the more abundant phenols [9, 44, 45]. Phenols are the secondary metabolites of plants with obvious antioxidant activities. Flavonoids, a class of phenols, such as kaempferol, tripholine, astragalin, robinin, and quercetin, have strong antioxidants that limit free radical accumulation and scavenge free radicals [46]. In the present study, relatively high antioxidant activities were found inC. colocynthis fruit coat,S. alexandrina pods, andA. aethiopicus, and the major compounds detected in these plant extracts were phenylalanine, benzoic acid, and robinin, respectively. Recent studies indicated that phenylalanine and benzoic acid might be strong antioxidants [47, 48]. Further, the fruit coat ofC. colocynthis, with relatively high 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic content in the present study, has been associated with strong antioxidant activity [49]. Lau et al. [43] reported high antioxidant activity ofPueraria lobata containing high amounts of robinin, which is analogous to the findings of the present study. The high antioxidant activity exhibited byA. aethiopicus might be attributed to the high robinin content. The leaves ofA. aethiopicus contained other phenolic compounds, such as rutin and chlorogenic acid, and these compounds have been known to have strong antioxidant activities [50].Previous investigations [51, 52] have indicated that the phenols and flavonoids present in the plants may have an influence on the microorganism growth. Generalić et al. [51] reported that leaf extracts ofSalvia officinalis L. contained high amounts of phenols and flavonoids exhibiting high antibacterial activity, especially againstE. coli,S. aureus, andB. cereus. In the present study, relatively high antibacterial activities were discovered in the extracts ofS. alexandrina pods,C. colocynthis fruit coat, andA. aethiopicus leaves. The phenylalanine in theC. colocynthis fruit coat has been reported to have antibacterial activity [53]. Ali et al. [54] reported that the Weinreb amides 3, 4, and 5 of alanine and phenylalanine exhibited good activity againstE. coli andPseudomonas aeruginosa; however, poor results were observed againstS. aureus andB. subtilis. Further, Gurudeeban et al. [16] reported high antibacterial activity of the methanolic extracts ofC. colocynthis fruits against bacteria, such asB. subtilis,Streptococcus pyogenes, andSalmonella typhi. Robinin extracted fromRobinia pseudoacacia L. has high antibacterial activity [55, 56]. Benzoic acid and its derivatives have antibacterial activities and might be used as food preservatives [57]. In the present study, the fruit coat ofC. colocynthis, pods ofS. alexandrina, and leaves ofA. aethiopicus showed relatively high antifungal activities in general, which might be attributed to high amounts of specific phenols in these plants. This is in agreement with the results of previous investigations [58, 59]. Zhang et al. [60] reported high antifungal activities ofRobinia pseudoacacia extracts, and this was attributed to high robinin content. Further, Al-Snafi [61] emphasized the antibacterial and antifungal activities of the seeds ofC. colocynthis. However, the present study was the first to explore the profile of these important phenols inC. colocynthis fruit parts. Further, Gurudeeban et al. [16] reported strong antifungal activities ofC. colocynthis againstAspergillus fumigatus andMucor sp.


## 5. Conclusions

The plants studied revealed great diversity in their phenolic profile and also their antioxidant, antibacterial, and antifungal activities. The major phenols identified were robinin in the leaves and fruits ofA. aethiopicus, caffeic acid inA. aethiopicus (tubers), quercitrin inG. pillansii (leaves), benzoic acid inS. alexandrina (pods), phenylalanine inC. colocynthis (fruit coat and seeds), hydroxycaffeic acid inC. colocynthis (fruit flesh), trifoline inK. delagoensis (leaves), rutin inC. citratus (leaves), esculin inB. juncea (seeds), and hydroxycaffeic acid inC. longa (roots). The leaves ofA. aethiopicus had relatively high amount of the phenolic compound, robinin compared with the other plants studied. Relatively high antioxidant, antibacterial, and antifungal activities were observed inC. colocynthis fruit coat,S. alexandrina pods, andA. aethiopicus. The high bioactivity of plant extracts was associated with the presence of phenols, especially the more abundant phenols: phenylalanine, benzoic acid, and robinin, respectively. Further, it could be concluded that the fruit coat ofC. colocynthis, pods ofS. alexandrina, and parts ofA. aethiopicus might be excellent sources of natural products that could be used in the pharmaceutical industries and control of diseases.



---

*Source: 1463579-2018-01-31.xml*