# Synthesis, Structural Analysis, and Biological Activities of Some Imidazolium Salts

Authors: Gühergül Uluçam; Murat Turkyilmaz
Journal: Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Four newly synthesized imidazolium salts were characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance, vibrational spectra, and mass spectra. Then, the density functional theory calculations were performed to obtain the molecular configurations on which the theoretical nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared spectra were consequently obtained. The comparison of calculated spectra with the experimental spectra for each molecule leads to the conclusion that the theoretical results can be assumed to be a good approach to their molecular configurations. The in vitro biological activities of the salts on the selected bacteria and cancer cell lines were determined by using the broth dilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The 1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide and 3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide showed efficiency onBacillus cereus ATCC 11778. The 3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1-H-imidazol-3-ium bromide was effective on HeLa while a similar effect was observed on Hep G2 with 3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Imidazole rings are building blocks in amino acids [1] together with the fact that their membership in the development of new antifungal drugs [2, 3] and antibiotics [4, 5] are crucial. Its derivatives are widely used in other medicinal applications [6]. The pregnane derivatives with imidazole moiety and triazole moiety, for example, were tested on the prostate, breast, and lung cancer cell lines, and dose-effective proliferation of the cells was determined [7]. Similarly, the novel hybrid compounds of imidazole scaffold-based 2-benzylbenzofloran have been prepared and used in cytotoxic activity studies on various cancer cell lines [8].As a five-membered aromatic ring containing two nonadjacent nitrogen atoms [9], imidazole is also subjected to various computational chemistry research beyond its biological applications. Its ability to capture CO2 was determined in the investigations of the greenhouse effect compensation in the framework of van der Waals bonded host-guest relation [10]. The hydroxyl conductivity in polymembranes based on imidazole salts was simulated using radial distribution functions and found that the imidazole groups provide better conductivity than that of water and methanol [11]. Moreover, the specific imidazole derivatives exhibited good cross section values for two-photon absorption [12]. The detoxification of phosphotriesters by imidazole rings was clarified comparing the same effects with methylimidazoles depending on the methyl positioning [13].N-Heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) are the imidazole-based carbene groups which are isolated and crystallized by the deprotonation of imidazole salts [14]. Also, the imidazole salts naturally transform into NHCs over metal complex building reactions, as exampled on the synthesis and characterization of the silver-NHC complexes [15] and the iron-imidazole salts [16].The constitution and functions of imidazole ligands in organometallic chemistry and inorganic chemistry have been widely studied, and these particular researches have been evaluated as a scientific competition field due to its importance in the related industry [17]. Also, they are set as alternative to usual ligands in the carbon-carbon coupling reactions of the pharmaceutical reagents [18]. The synthesis and spectroscopic characterizations of four new NHC ligands, namely, 1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide (LA), 3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LB), 1,3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LC), and 3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LD) were exhibited in this study. Using their nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and infrared (IR) spectra, the molecular properties of the ligands were obtained. Also, the in vitro biological activities of the synthesized molecules were presented.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Instrumentation and Methods

The1H and 13C NMR spectra of the compounds in deuterium oxide (D2O) were recorded on Varian 300 MHz and Varian 75.5 MHz, respectively. The IR spectra by KBr pellets were recorded in the range 450–4000 cm−1 by a PerkinElmer BXII spectrometer. The mass spectra were acquired by the electron impact technique using a Thermo Finnegan Trace DSQ GC/MS. Elemental analyses for C, H, and N were realized on the dried samples using a PerkinElmer 2400 CHN analyzer. The absorbance measurements in determining the biological activities of the material were carried out in Thermo Scientific Multiskan Go multiplate spectrophotometer.


### 2.2. Synthesis

#### 2.2.1. 1,3-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl) Imidazolidinium Bromide,LA

Imidazole (10 mmol, 0.68 g) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF), and bromoethanol (22 mmol, 2.75 g) was added as the mixture was stirred for 20 hours. The completion of the reaction was monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) in ethyl acetate/hexane (1 : 5) analyses, and the solid residue was filtered out with a sintered glass funnel. The solvent in the filtrate was evaporated using a rotary evaporator, and the product was dried in a vacuum desiccator. After that, the product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane, 1 : 5). The best yield was obtained when the reaction was carried out at room temperature with a 1 : 2 mole ratio of the reagents. 1.54 g of the final product was obtained with 65% yield. It was in yellowish liquid form. The elemental analyses result forLA with the chemical formula C7H13BrN2O2 are C, 35.46%; H, 5.53%; and N, 11.82%; found: C, 35.35%; H, 5.43%; and N, 11.73%. The mass spectroscopy reads (m/z) 158.22 (M + H)+ which is consistent with the expected molecular weight.


#### 2.2.2. 3-(2-Ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium Bromide,LB

3-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)propan-1-amine (10 mmol, 1.27 g) was dissolved in THF and stirred at room temperature, and then, ethyl bromoacetate (11 mmol, 1.837 g) was added with a 1 : 1 mole ratio. The mixture was stirred for 15 hr. The completion of the reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) in ethyl acetate/hexane (1 : 5) analyses. The solvent was evaporated in a rotary evaporator, and the substance was kept under vacuum in a desiccator. After that, the product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane, 1 : 5). It was pale brown oily liquid. 0.94 g of the final product was obtained with 32% yield. The elemental analyses result for LB with the chemical formula C10H18BrN3O2 are C, 41.11%; H, 6.21%; and N, 14.38%; found: C, 39.93%; H, 6.35%; N, and 14.21%. The mass spectroscopy result reads (m/z) 213.12 (M  + H)+ which is consistent with the expected molecular weight.


#### 2.2.3. 1,3-Bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium Bromide,LC

The procedure applied in the synthesis ofLA was also used for the synthesis of LC by replacing imidazole and bromoethanol with 4-methylimidazole (10 mmol, 0.82 g) and 3-bromopropionic acid (22 mmol, 3.366 g), respectively. After that, the product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane, 1 : 5). It was in white solid form. 1.48 g of the final product was obtained with 48% yield. The elemental analyses result for LC with the chemical formula C10H15BrN2O4 are C, 39.10%; H, 4.92%; and N, 9.12%; found: C, 38.97%; H, 4.77%; and N, 19.22%. The mass spectroscopy result reads (m/z) 227.68 (M + H)+ which is consistent with the expected molecular weight.


#### 2.2.4. 3-(2-Carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium Bromide,LD

The procedure applied in the synthesis ofLB was also used for the synthesis of LD by replacing ethyl bromoacetate with 3-bromopropanoic acid (11 mmol, 1.683 g), respectively. The product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane, 1 : 5). It was pale brown oily liquid. 1.22 g of the final product was obtained with 44% yield. The elemental analyses result for LD with the chemical formula C9H16BrN3O3 are C, 38.86%; H.5.80%; and N, 15.11%; found: C, 38.77%; H, 5.63%; and N, 15.23%. The mass spectroscopy result reads (m/z) 198.25 (M + H)+ which is consistent with the expected molecular weight.


### 2.3. Biological Activities

#### 2.3.1. Antibacterial Activity

Broth microdilution method as in the guidelines of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute was applied to determine the antibacterial activities of theLA, LB, LC, and LD on the Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Escherichia coli 0157:H7, and Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028), Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115), and standard yeast Candida albicans ATCC 10231. The bacteria and yeast were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. The incubations were done in Tryptic Soy Broth medium at 37°C for 24 hr in the scale of McFarland 0.5. The antibiotic controls were carried by gentamicin on Bacillus cereus ATCC 1177 and amphotericin-b on Candida albicans ATCC 10231, while ampicillin was used on the other bacteria samples. For sterilization purposes, the antibiotic solutions and the stock solution of the chemicals were filtered through a 0.45 μm sterile filter. The solvent in which the test compounds dissolved was dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) which did not show any inhibition effect on the bacteria. The pure LA, LB, LC, and LD solutions and the pure microorganism planted mediums were used as the sterility and the growth controls, respectively. The six different concentrations of the each compound were applied to the cells starting from 32 μm and diluting to half each time. Each of the 96 microplates was planted in 150 μl of Tryptic Soy Broth medium, 30 μl of the bacteria or the yeast culture, and 20 μl of the chemical compound solution. All microplates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. The absorbance was measured at 600 nm.


#### 2.3.2. Cytotoxicity

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to observe the cytotoxicity of synthesized compounds on human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa), human liver cancer cell line (Hep G2), and healthy mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line (MEF). All cell lines were provided with American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). A certain population of the cells were incubated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) provided with Life Technologies GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA involving 1% penicillin streptomycin and 1% L-glutamine and HAMS F12 (1 : 1) broth medium at 37°C under 5% CO2. The cells were planted in 96-multiwell plates with approximately equal numbers of 105, and they were allowed further incubation for 24 hr. The seven different doses of each compound were applied to the cancer cell lines and the MEF cells. The applied doses were 400 μm, 200 μm, 100 μm, 50 μm, 25 μm, 12.5 μm, and 6.25 μm, and the dose application time was 24 hr. The surviving control for each cell was carried out against the cells not exposed to any dose. Then, 20 μl/plate of 5 mg/ml MTT solution was added into the each well and left to further incubation between 2 and 4 hr. The excess MTT solutions were removed from the wells, and 200 μl of ultra-pure DMSO was added. The set was left in dark for 5 min before measuring the color intensities on a 492 nm spectrophotometer.


### 2.4. Computational Modeling

All calculations were carried out in the framework of Gaussian 09 package. The molecules were optimized in their ground state using Becke3-Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) exchange correlation functional method and 6-311G + (2d, p) basis set within density functional theory (DFT). Then, the NMR spectra and the IR spectra were calculated on the optimized geometries using the same method and the same basis set. The gauge-independent atomic orbital (GIAO) method was adopted to acquire theoretical1H and 13C NMR shifts, which were converted to that of tetramethylsilane scale. The IR spectra were scaled by the factor 0.9613 due to the theoretical miscalculations [19–21]. The vibrational modes were assigned by observing the animation property of the frequency calculations provided with Gaussian 09 package.


## 2.1. Instrumentation and Methods

The1H and 13C NMR spectra of the compounds in deuterium oxide (D2O) were recorded on Varian 300 MHz and Varian 75.5 MHz, respectively. The IR spectra by KBr pellets were recorded in the range 450–4000 cm−1 by a PerkinElmer BXII spectrometer. The mass spectra were acquired by the electron impact technique using a Thermo Finnegan Trace DSQ GC/MS. Elemental analyses for C, H, and N were realized on the dried samples using a PerkinElmer 2400 CHN analyzer. The absorbance measurements in determining the biological activities of the material were carried out in Thermo Scientific Multiskan Go multiplate spectrophotometer.


## 2.2. Synthesis

### 2.2.1. 1,3-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl) Imidazolidinium Bromide,LA

Imidazole (10 mmol, 0.68 g) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF), and bromoethanol (22 mmol, 2.75 g) was added as the mixture was stirred for 20 hours. The completion of the reaction was monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) in ethyl acetate/hexane (1 : 5) analyses, and the solid residue was filtered out with a sintered glass funnel. The solvent in the filtrate was evaporated using a rotary evaporator, and the product was dried in a vacuum desiccator. After that, the product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane, 1 : 5). The best yield was obtained when the reaction was carried out at room temperature with a 1 : 2 mole ratio of the reagents. 1.54 g of the final product was obtained with 65% yield. It was in yellowish liquid form. The elemental analyses result forLA with the chemical formula C7H13BrN2O2 are C, 35.46%; H, 5.53%; and N, 11.82%; found: C, 35.35%; H, 5.43%; and N, 11.73%. The mass spectroscopy reads (m/z) 158.22 (M + H)+ which is consistent with the expected molecular weight.


### 2.2.2. 3-(2-Ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium Bromide,LB

3-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)propan-1-amine (10 mmol, 1.27 g) was dissolved in THF and stirred at room temperature, and then, ethyl bromoacetate (11 mmol, 1.837 g) was added with a 1 : 1 mole ratio. The mixture was stirred for 15 hr. The completion of the reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) in ethyl acetate/hexane (1 : 5) analyses. The solvent was evaporated in a rotary evaporator, and the substance was kept under vacuum in a desiccator. After that, the product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane, 1 : 5). It was pale brown oily liquid. 0.94 g of the final product was obtained with 32% yield. The elemental analyses result for LB with the chemical formula C10H18BrN3O2 are C, 41.11%; H, 6.21%; and N, 14.38%; found: C, 39.93%; H, 6.35%; N, and 14.21%. The mass spectroscopy result reads (m/z) 213.12 (M  + H)+ which is consistent with the expected molecular weight.


### 2.2.3. 1,3-Bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium Bromide,LC

The procedure applied in the synthesis ofLA was also used for the synthesis of LC by replacing imidazole and bromoethanol with 4-methylimidazole (10 mmol, 0.82 g) and 3-bromopropionic acid (22 mmol, 3.366 g), respectively. After that, the product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane, 1 : 5). It was in white solid form. 1.48 g of the final product was obtained with 48% yield. The elemental analyses result for LC with the chemical formula C10H15BrN2O4 are C, 39.10%; H, 4.92%; and N, 9.12%; found: C, 38.97%; H, 4.77%; and N, 19.22%. The mass spectroscopy result reads (m/z) 227.68 (M + H)+ which is consistent with the expected molecular weight.


### 2.2.4. 3-(2-Carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium Bromide,LD

The procedure applied in the synthesis ofLB was also used for the synthesis of LD by replacing ethyl bromoacetate with 3-bromopropanoic acid (11 mmol, 1.683 g), respectively. The product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane, 1 : 5). It was pale brown oily liquid. 1.22 g of the final product was obtained with 44% yield. The elemental analyses result for LD with the chemical formula C9H16BrN3O3 are C, 38.86%; H.5.80%; and N, 15.11%; found: C, 38.77%; H, 5.63%; and N, 15.23%. The mass spectroscopy result reads (m/z) 198.25 (M + H)+ which is consistent with the expected molecular weight.


## 2.2.1. 1,3-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl) Imidazolidinium Bromide,LA

Imidazole (10 mmol, 0.68 g) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF), and bromoethanol (22 mmol, 2.75 g) was added as the mixture was stirred for 20 hours. The completion of the reaction was monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) in ethyl acetate/hexane (1 : 5) analyses, and the solid residue was filtered out with a sintered glass funnel. The solvent in the filtrate was evaporated using a rotary evaporator, and the product was dried in a vacuum desiccator. After that, the product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane, 1 : 5). The best yield was obtained when the reaction was carried out at room temperature with a 1 : 2 mole ratio of the reagents. 1.54 g of the final product was obtained with 65% yield. It was in yellowish liquid form. The elemental analyses result forLA with the chemical formula C7H13BrN2O2 are C, 35.46%; H, 5.53%; and N, 11.82%; found: C, 35.35%; H, 5.43%; and N, 11.73%. The mass spectroscopy reads (m/z) 158.22 (M + H)+ which is consistent with the expected molecular weight.


## 2.2.2. 3-(2-Ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium Bromide,LB

3-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)propan-1-amine (10 mmol, 1.27 g) was dissolved in THF and stirred at room temperature, and then, ethyl bromoacetate (11 mmol, 1.837 g) was added with a 1 : 1 mole ratio. The mixture was stirred for 15 hr. The completion of the reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) in ethyl acetate/hexane (1 : 5) analyses. The solvent was evaporated in a rotary evaporator, and the substance was kept under vacuum in a desiccator. After that, the product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane, 1 : 5). It was pale brown oily liquid. 0.94 g of the final product was obtained with 32% yield. The elemental analyses result for LB with the chemical formula C10H18BrN3O2 are C, 41.11%; H, 6.21%; and N, 14.38%; found: C, 39.93%; H, 6.35%; N, and 14.21%. The mass spectroscopy result reads (m/z) 213.12 (M  + H)+ which is consistent with the expected molecular weight.


## 2.2.3. 1,3-Bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium Bromide,LC

The procedure applied in the synthesis ofLA was also used for the synthesis of LC by replacing imidazole and bromoethanol with 4-methylimidazole (10 mmol, 0.82 g) and 3-bromopropionic acid (22 mmol, 3.366 g), respectively. After that, the product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane, 1 : 5). It was in white solid form. 1.48 g of the final product was obtained with 48% yield. The elemental analyses result for LC with the chemical formula C10H15BrN2O4 are C, 39.10%; H, 4.92%; and N, 9.12%; found: C, 38.97%; H, 4.77%; and N, 19.22%. The mass spectroscopy result reads (m/z) 227.68 (M + H)+ which is consistent with the expected molecular weight.


## 2.2.4. 3-(2-Carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium Bromide,LD

The procedure applied in the synthesis ofLB was also used for the synthesis of LD by replacing ethyl bromoacetate with 3-bromopropanoic acid (11 mmol, 1.683 g), respectively. The product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane, 1 : 5). It was pale brown oily liquid. 1.22 g of the final product was obtained with 44% yield. The elemental analyses result for LD with the chemical formula C9H16BrN3O3 are C, 38.86%; H.5.80%; and N, 15.11%; found: C, 38.77%; H, 5.63%; and N, 15.23%. The mass spectroscopy result reads (m/z) 198.25 (M + H)+ which is consistent with the expected molecular weight.


## 2.3. Biological Activities

### 2.3.1. Antibacterial Activity

Broth microdilution method as in the guidelines of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute was applied to determine the antibacterial activities of theLA, LB, LC, and LD on the Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Escherichia coli 0157:H7, and Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028), Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115), and standard yeast Candida albicans ATCC 10231. The bacteria and yeast were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. The incubations were done in Tryptic Soy Broth medium at 37°C for 24 hr in the scale of McFarland 0.5. The antibiotic controls were carried by gentamicin on Bacillus cereus ATCC 1177 and amphotericin-b on Candida albicans ATCC 10231, while ampicillin was used on the other bacteria samples. For sterilization purposes, the antibiotic solutions and the stock solution of the chemicals were filtered through a 0.45 μm sterile filter. The solvent in which the test compounds dissolved was dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) which did not show any inhibition effect on the bacteria. The pure LA, LB, LC, and LD solutions and the pure microorganism planted mediums were used as the sterility and the growth controls, respectively. The six different concentrations of the each compound were applied to the cells starting from 32 μm and diluting to half each time. Each of the 96 microplates was planted in 150 μl of Tryptic Soy Broth medium, 30 μl of the bacteria or the yeast culture, and 20 μl of the chemical compound solution. All microplates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. The absorbance was measured at 600 nm.


### 2.3.2. Cytotoxicity

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to observe the cytotoxicity of synthesized compounds on human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa), human liver cancer cell line (Hep G2), and healthy mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line (MEF). All cell lines were provided with American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). A certain population of the cells were incubated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) provided with Life Technologies GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA involving 1% penicillin streptomycin and 1% L-glutamine and HAMS F12 (1 : 1) broth medium at 37°C under 5% CO2. The cells were planted in 96-multiwell plates with approximately equal numbers of 105, and they were allowed further incubation for 24 hr. The seven different doses of each compound were applied to the cancer cell lines and the MEF cells. The applied doses were 400 μm, 200 μm, 100 μm, 50 μm, 25 μm, 12.5 μm, and 6.25 μm, and the dose application time was 24 hr. The surviving control for each cell was carried out against the cells not exposed to any dose. Then, 20 μl/plate of 5 mg/ml MTT solution was added into the each well and left to further incubation between 2 and 4 hr. The excess MTT solutions were removed from the wells, and 200 μl of ultra-pure DMSO was added. The set was left in dark for 5 min before measuring the color intensities on a 492 nm spectrophotometer.


## 2.3.1. Antibacterial Activity

Broth microdilution method as in the guidelines of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute was applied to determine the antibacterial activities of theLA, LB, LC, and LD on the Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Escherichia coli 0157:H7, and Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028), Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115), and standard yeast Candida albicans ATCC 10231. The bacteria and yeast were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. The incubations were done in Tryptic Soy Broth medium at 37°C for 24 hr in the scale of McFarland 0.5. The antibiotic controls were carried by gentamicin on Bacillus cereus ATCC 1177 and amphotericin-b on Candida albicans ATCC 10231, while ampicillin was used on the other bacteria samples. For sterilization purposes, the antibiotic solutions and the stock solution of the chemicals were filtered through a 0.45 μm sterile filter. The solvent in which the test compounds dissolved was dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) which did not show any inhibition effect on the bacteria. The pure LA, LB, LC, and LD solutions and the pure microorganism planted mediums were used as the sterility and the growth controls, respectively. The six different concentrations of the each compound were applied to the cells starting from 32 μm and diluting to half each time. Each of the 96 microplates was planted in 150 μl of Tryptic Soy Broth medium, 30 μl of the bacteria or the yeast culture, and 20 μl of the chemical compound solution. All microplates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. The absorbance was measured at 600 nm.


## 2.3.2. Cytotoxicity

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to observe the cytotoxicity of synthesized compounds on human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa), human liver cancer cell line (Hep G2), and healthy mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line (MEF). All cell lines were provided with American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). A certain population of the cells were incubated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) provided with Life Technologies GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA involving 1% penicillin streptomycin and 1% L-glutamine and HAMS F12 (1 : 1) broth medium at 37°C under 5% CO2. The cells were planted in 96-multiwell plates with approximately equal numbers of 105, and they were allowed further incubation for 24 hr. The seven different doses of each compound were applied to the cancer cell lines and the MEF cells. The applied doses were 400 μm, 200 μm, 100 μm, 50 μm, 25 μm, 12.5 μm, and 6.25 μm, and the dose application time was 24 hr. The surviving control for each cell was carried out against the cells not exposed to any dose. Then, 20 μl/plate of 5 mg/ml MTT solution was added into the each well and left to further incubation between 2 and 4 hr. The excess MTT solutions were removed from the wells, and 200 μl of ultra-pure DMSO was added. The set was left in dark for 5 min before measuring the color intensities on a 492 nm spectrophotometer.


## 2.4. Computational Modeling

All calculations were carried out in the framework of Gaussian 09 package. The molecules were optimized in their ground state using Becke3-Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) exchange correlation functional method and 6-311G + (2d, p) basis set within density functional theory (DFT). Then, the NMR spectra and the IR spectra were calculated on the optimized geometries using the same method and the same basis set. The gauge-independent atomic orbital (GIAO) method was adopted to acquire theoretical1H and 13C NMR shifts, which were converted to that of tetramethylsilane scale. The IR spectra were scaled by the factor 0.9613 due to the theoretical miscalculations [19–21]. The vibrational modes were assigned by observing the animation property of the frequency calculations provided with Gaussian 09 package.


## 3. Result and Discussion

NMR and IR spectra are reliable methods to elucidate an organic material or some of metal complexes. They can also be used to verify calculated molecular structure by comparing calculated spectra with corresponding experimental spectra and thus determining structural parameters and complete description of chemicals investigated.


### 3.1. Molecular Structures

The NMR measurements were taken in dilute D2O solution, while the IR spectra were recorded in the solid KBr pellet. Therefore, NMR and infrared spectra may reflect different molecular structures as the molecule surrounded by D2O molecules in NMR spectra while the intermolecular interactions exist in the IR spectra, especially on -CH and -OH bonds [22]. On the theoretical calculation side, the crystalline phase calculations were excluded due to the single crystal form of the molecules obtained for X-ray analysis. The gas phase calculations were adopted considering differences with other phases with 2% maximum error margin which were especially on the -CH and -OH bond lengths.The process of the theoretical modeling of the molecules has initially been realized by using the potential energy surface scanning method for the selected dihedral angles of each molecule, thus obtaining the lowest energy conformers in the gas phase, and the resulting optimized conformers are given in Scheme1. The imidazole rings except that of LC with its CH3 attachment and the CH2 groups directly bonded to the nitrogen of the rings are common in the all molecules.Scheme 1
Optimized conformers of the synthesized imidazole molecules with their labeled and numbered atoms: (a) 1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide, (b) 3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide, (c) 1,3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide, and (d) 3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)L
A has the point group symmetry C2 as the other molecules were found to have C1 symmetry. The lower point group symmetry of the LB, LC, and LD in comparison with the C2 symmetry of LA is because of the attachment of the different aliphatic chains to their imidazole rings. The calculated optimized energies and the dipole moments of LA, LD, LB, and LC are, respectively, −534.4, −667.3, −706.6, and −800.5 in units of a.u. and 2.11, 3.41, 4.54, and 7.78 in units of Debye.The calculated parameters of the common properties of the molecules are presented in Table1. Although the molecules differ from each other by their moieties bonded to the imidazole rings, the bond lengths, the bond angles, and the dihedral angles belong to the ring, and its immediate vicinity are in good agreement with each other and with the corresponding X-ray diffractometer (XRD) results of previously investigated similar molecule 1,3-bis(acetamide)imidazol-3-ium bromide which was crystallized successfully [22]. The dihedral angles chosen on the imidazole ring are either about 0° or 180°, implying the aromatic structure as expected. The C-N bond lengths which bind the rings and the aliphatic moieties, that is, C4-N2 and N1-C5 are equal in LA reflecting the symmetric structure of the molecule. However, these are different in LB, LC, and LD because of the different moieties on the both side of their aromatic rings. Although the symmetry of LC was broken by the C-CH3 group instead of C-H in the ring, no drastic changes were observed in the concerning ring parameters. It can be inferred that the common geometrical parameters are consistent with each other with a priori theoretical confirmations before NMR and IR spectra clarifications of the calculated molecular structures.Table 1
Some selected geometrical parameters of the common properties of the investigated molecules.
L
A
L
B
L
C
L
D
L
Selected bond lengths (Å)
C1-H1
1.102
1.043
1.061
1.095
0.976
C1-N1
1.295
1.301
—
—
1.312 (7)
C3-N1
1.403
1.398
1.335
1.396
1.374 (8)
C2-C3
1.297
1.332
1.366
1.314
1.312 (10)
C4-N2
1.464
1.437
1.418
1.523
1.444 (8)
N1-C5
1.464
1.474
1.429
1.505
1.444 (8)
C7B-O1B
—
1.204
—
—
1.241 (8)
N3B(D)-H3B(D)
—
1.015
—
1.013
1.010
Selected bond angles (°)
N1-C1-N2
108.7
112.6
111.7
108.9
109.2 (6)
C1-N1-C3
108.9
105.7
108.9
108.6
107.9 (5)
C1-N1-C5
125.1
127.6
126.0
126.0
126.2 (5)
C4-N2-C1
125.1
126.5
126.9
125.2
126.2 (5)
H2-C2-N2
122.6
121.8
121.8
122.3
123.4
C3-C2-H2
130.6
129.4
129.9
130.5
128.2
Selected dihedral angles (°)
C4-N2-C1-N1
177.5
179.2
179.6
178.6
178.4 (5)
N2-C2-C3-N1
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.9 (8)
C5-N1-C1-N2
177.5
175.1
179.1
179.6
178.4 (5)
C5-N1-C3-C2
177.7
175.2
179.8
179.7
177.9 (6)
The data of the molecule showed byL in the last column reflect the X-ray diffraction measurements and calculated values on 1,3-bis(acetamide)imidazol-3-ium bromide as given in [22]. The numbers in the paranthesis indicates the experimental error margins on the specific measurements. The labeled and numbered atoms in the first column are presented for each molecule in Scheme 1.


### 3.2. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra

The experimental and theoretical chemical shifts of1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of LA, LB, LC, and LD molecules are given in Table 2. The calculations were carried out in the gas phase considering their optimized geometries given in Scheme 1. The proton signals for -NH2 and -OH in all were absent in the experimental 1H NMR spectra because the solvent was D2O concerning the solubility of the specimens which exchanged NH2 and OH protons with deuterium. Although their detailed analysis left to the IR spectra in the following section, the calculated shifts δ 1.73 ppm of OH in LA and δ 0.5 ppm and δ 0.7 ppm of NH2 in LB and LD, respectively, are in the typical chemical shift range of R-NH2 and R-OH groups.Table 2
Proton and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance spectral data of the molecules.
Assignment
Proton chemical shift (ppm)
Assignment
Carbon chemical shift (ppm)
Experimental
Theory
Experimental
Theory
1,3-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide (LA)
s, 1H, NCHN
9.06
9.06
NCHN
136.33
137.66
d, 2H, HC=CH
7.70
7.32
HC=CH
122.60
123.06
t, 4H, N-CH2
3.93
4.01
O-CH2
59.75
61.68
t, 4H, O-CH2
3.82
3.87
N-CH2
51.98
52.59
s. 2H, OH
—
1.73
—
—
—
3-(2-Ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LB)
s, 1H, NCHN
7.79
7.73
CO
171.85
172.23
d, 1H, HC=CH
7.25
7.23
NCHN
136.78
137.10
d, 1H, HC=CH
7.02
7.00
HC=CH
125.13
124.74
s, 2H, N-CH2 CO
4.23
4.22 (2)
HC=CH
120.73
121.34
q, 2H, CH2-CH3
3.23
3.21 (3)
O-CH2-CH3
60.78
57.36
t, 2H, N-CH2-C
2.95
2.96 (3)
N-CH2
54.97
54.10
t, 2H, NH2-CH2
2.55
2.54 (2)
N-CH2-CH2-
44.97
38.64
m, 2H, C-CH2-C
2.20
2.18 (2)
NH2-CH2-
36.84
36.61
t, 3H, CH3
2.02
2.04 (3)
C-CH2-C
28.72
31.52
NH2
—
0.5 (3)
CH3
13.64
17.70
1,3-Bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LC)
s, 1H, NCHN
8.84
8.83
COOH
173.03
170.3 (1)
s, 1H, HC=C-CH3
7.33
7.34
NCHN
133.30
132.96
s, OH
—
5.95 (2)
C-CH3
129.94
130.93
t, 4H, N-CH2
3.64
3.62 (5)
C=C-CH3
116.01
119.67
N-CH2
37.53
39.7 (9)
t, 4H, CH2-COOH
2.91
3.10 (2)
CH2-COOH
26.79
33.8 (5)
s, 3H, -CH3
2.38
2.37
CH3
9.01
10.26
3-(2-Carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LD)
s, 1H, NCHN
9.11
9.11
COOH
170.21
177.74
d, 1H, HC=CH
7.72
7.71
NCHN
137.16
137.47
d, 1H, HC=CH
7.65
7.63
HC=CH
123.94
124.97
s, OH
—
6.39
HC=CH
121.50
124.69
t, 4H, N-CH2
4.45
4.47 (1)
N-CH2
60.01
60.29
t, 2H, COOH-C
3.33
3.34
N-CH2
52.02
53.30
t, 2H, NH2-CH2
3.05
3.03
NH2-CH2
45.42
45.41
m, 2H, C-CH2-C
2.33
2.31
C-CH2-C
36.18
40.05
NH2
—
0.7 (3)
COOH-CH2
27.76
34.43The imidazole proton (NCHN, H1) shifts of LA, LC, and LD with 9.06 ppm, 8.84 ppm, and 9.11 ppm, respectively, are noticeably bigger than that of LB with 7.79 ppm. That can be due to the intramolecular interactions of the NCHN hydrogen with the close oxygen atoms since the oxygen reduces the electron density on the hydrogen depending on the distance between them, thus causing higher NMR shifts. Indeed, the H1-O1A in LA, the H1-O1C in LC, and the H1-O1D in LD are 2.61 Å, 2.42 Å, and 2.41 Å, respectively. These distances which were measured from the theoretical models of the molecules are quite longer than that 2.85 Å distance of the H1-O1B measured in LB which results in small shifts for the H1 of LB. This is supported by the fact that the other imidazole proton shifts of H2 and H3 are all in close values about 7.7 ppm for all molecules as no distinct intermolecular interactions possible on H2 and H3 in any of them. In addition, the NMR signals of CH2 protons in the aliphatic chains of all molecules and the smallest proton shifts of CH3 protons in LB and LC molecules are theoretically and experimentally in agreement with the expected NMR results. These NMR data are in accordance with the previous study on a similar imidazole salt [23, 24] in which the protons belong to the aliphatic chain found in 4.15 ppm–2.08 ppm, the carbons belong to the imidazole ring, and the aliphatic chain is found in 139.2 ppm–123 ppm and 62.5 ppm–33.9 ppm as in this study.The eightR-squared tests using the data in Table 2 provide least 99.8% agreement between the experimental and the theoretical 1H and 13C NMR for LA, LB, LC, and LD. The theoretical results for NMR are in very good agreement with the experimental results as well as the observation of the expected specific values. Thus, one can infer that the calculated atomic configurations of the all molecules are good estimations except the exclusion of the interchangeable hydrogens.


### 3.3. Infrared Spectra

In Figure1, the experimental infrared spectra of LA, LB, LC, and LD in the 450–4000 cm−1 region are given against their IR spectra calculations. The detailed account of the IR spectra including the in-plane vibrations of the stretching, scissoring, and rocking and the out-of-plane vibrations of the wagging and twisting for each molecule is presented for LA, LB, LC, and LD in Tables 3–6, respectively. The R-square test results exhibit 99.8%, 99.5%, 99.5%, and 99.7% agreement between the experimental and the theoretical IR spectra of LA, LB, LC, and LD, respectively.Figure 1
Calculated (bold lines) and experimental (pale lines) infrared spectra of the synthesized imidazole molecules: (a)1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide, (b) 3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide, (c) 1,3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide, and (d) 3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide.Table 3
The experimental and theoretical vibrational wave numbers for the infrared spectra of1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide (LA) with its symbolled and numbered atoms in Figure 1(a).
Vibrational assignments/vibrating atoms
Theory
Experiment
ν
s(OH)/(O1A-H1A, H2A-O2A)
3477
3358
ν
as(OH)/(O1A-H1A, H2A-O2A)
3477
ν
as(CH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C5-H5,H′5-C5)
3093
3114–2822
ν
as(CH2)/(C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A)
3011
ν(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
2949
ν
s(CH)/(C2-H2, H3-C3)
2928
ν
s(CH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C5-H5, H′5-C5)
2914
ν
as(CH)/(C2-H2, H3-C3)
2899
ν
s(CH2)/(C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A)
2880
2808
ν
as(CN)/(C1-N1,N2-C1)
1682
1630
ν
s(CN)/(C1-N1,N2-C1)
1543
1592
δ
sc(CH2)/(C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A)
1452
1463
δ
sc(CH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C5-H5, H′5-C5)
1428
δ(OH)/(O1A-H1A), (O2A-H2A)
1411
γ
t(CH2) + δr(CH) + δ(NCHN)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C2-H2, C3-H3), (C1-H1)
1375
1373
γ
w(CH2) + νs(CN)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A), (C4-N2, N1-C5)
1355
1330
δ
r(CH)/(C2-H2, H3-C3)
1345
γ
t(CH2) + δ(NCHN) + δr(CH)/(C6A-H6A,H′6A-C6A), (C1-H1), (C2-H2, H3-C3)
1323
1301
γ
t(CH2) + δ(NCHN) + δr(CH)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C1-H1), (C2-H2, H3-C3)
1313
δ(NCHN) + γw(OH)/(C1-H1), (O1A-H1A, H2A-O2A)
1274
1265
γ
t(CH2) + δr(OH)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (O1A-H1A, O2A-H2A)
1212
γ
t(CH2) + δr(OH)/(C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A), (O1A-H1A, O2A-H2A)
1209
δ
sc(CH)/(C2-H2, H3-C3)
1149
1179
ν
as(CN)/(C3-N1, N2-C2) + (C4-N2, N1-C5)
1143
ν
as(CO) + νas(CC)/(C6A-O2A, O1A-C7A), (C6A-C4, C5-C7A)
1077
1080
ν
s(CO) + νs(CC)/(C6A-O2A, O1A-C7A), (C6A-C4, C5-C7A)
1076
δ
r(CH2) + νs(CO)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C6A-O2A, C7A-O1A)
1047
δ
r (CH2) + νs (CN)/(C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A), (C3-N1, N2-C2)
997
956
γ(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
946
ν
s(CC)/(C6A-C4, C5-C7A)
930
917
δ
r(CH2) + νas(CO)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C6A-O2A, O1A-C7A)
867
875
δ
r(CH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A)
861
γ
w(CH) + γ(NCHN)/(C2-H2, H3-C3), (C1-H1)
853
840
ν
as(CN) + δr(CH2)/(N2-C4, N1-C5), (C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A)
677
673
γ(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
617
639
ν, stretching; δ, in-plane bending; γ, out-of-plane bending; s, symmetric; as, asymmetric; sc, scissoring; r, rocking; t, twisting; w, wagging.Table 4
The experimental and theoretical vibrational wave numbers for the infrared spectra of3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LB) with its symbolled and numbered atoms in Figure 1(b).
Vibrational assignments/vibrating atoms
Theory
Experiment
ν(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
3460
3400
ν
as(NH2)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B)
3412
ν
s(NH2)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B)
3345
ν
as(CH2)/(C9B-H9B, H′9B-C9B)
3327
3192–2720
ν
s(CH2) + νs(CH2)/(C1-H5, H′5-C1), (C9B-H9B, H′9B-C9B)
3270
ν (CH2)/(C4-H′4)
3263
ν (CH2)/(C8B-H8B)
3226
ν
as(CH2)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5)
3221
ν
s(CH2)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5)
3157
ν(CH)/(C3-H3)
3087
ν(CH)/(C2-H2)
2946
ν
as(CH2)/(C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B)
2843
ν
s(CH2)/(C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B)
2795
ν
as(CH3)/(C10B-H10B, H′10B-C10B)
2784
ν
as(CH3)/(C10B-H10B, H″10B-C10B)
2783
ν
s(CH3)/(C10B-H10B, H′10B-C10B, H″10B-C10B)
2731
ν(CH2)/(C8B-H′8B)
2606
2618
ν(CO)/(C7B-O1B)
1707
1753
ν(CN) + δ(CH) + ν(C=C)/(C1-N2), (C2-H2), (C2-C3)
1652
1645
ν(CN) + ν(C=C)/(C1-N1), (C2-C3)
1619
δ
sc(NH2)/(C3B-H3B, H′3B-C3B)
1606
ν
s(CN) + ν(NC)/(N2-C1,C1-N1), (N2-C2)
1494
1561
δ
sc(CH3) + δ(CH3)/(C10B-H10B, C10B-H″10B), (C10B-H′10B)
1464
1528
δ
sc(CH2)/(C8B-H8B, H′8B-C8B)
1462
δ
sc(CH3) +  δ(CH3)/(C10B-H′10B, C10B-H″10B), (C10B-H10B)
1451
1473
δ
sc(CH2)/(C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B)
1441
δ
sc(CH2) +  γw(CH3)/(C9B-H9B, H′9B-C9B), (C10B-H10B, C10B-H′10B)
1415
1465
δ
sc(CH2)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5)
1381
1458
γ
w(CH2) + δsc(CH2)/(C8B-H8B, H′8B-C8B), (C4-H4, H′4-C4)
1372
γ
w(CH2) + δsc(CH2)/(C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B), (C4-H4, H′4-C4)
1352
1394
ν
s(CN) + γt(CH2)/(C4-N2, N1-C5), (C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B), (C5-H5, H′5-C5)
1319
1300
γ
w(CH2)/(C9B-H9B, H′9B-C9B)
1309
γ
t(NH2) + γt(CH2)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B), (C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B)
1296
1242
δ(NCHN) + δr(CH)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2, C3-H3)
1282
ν
as(CO) + γw(CH2)/(C7B-O2B, O2B-C9B), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C9B-H9B, H′9B-C9B)
1248
1214
ν
as(CO) + γw(CH3)/(C7B-O2B, O2B-C9B), (C10B-H10B, C10B-H″10B)
1198
1183
ν
as(CC) + ν(CO) + νs(CN)/(C8B-C6B, C6B-C4), (C3B-O2B), (C4-N2, N1-C5)
1123
1118
ν
s(CO) + ν(CC) + δ(NCHN)/(C7B-O2B, O2B-C9B), (C9B-C10B), (C7B-C5), (C1-H1)
1069
1097
γ
w(NH2) + δr(CH2)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B), (C8B-H8B, H′8B-C8B)
1011
1039
γ
w(NH2) + ν(CC)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B)  + (C6B-C4)
869
931
ν(CC) + γw(CH3) + ν(CO)/(C5-C7B), (C10B-H10B, C10B-H′10B), (C7B-O2B)
860
852
γ
w(NH2) + ν(CC)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B), (C4-C6B)
824
787
γ(NCHN) + γw(CH)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2, C3-H3)
797
765
γ
w(CH) + γt(NH2) + γt(CN)/(C2-H2, C3-H3), (N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B), (N1-C5)
759
700
γ
t(NH2) γt(CN) + γ(NCHN)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B), (N2-C4), (C1-H1)
722
652
γ
t(CH2) + δ(CC)/(C8B-H8B, H′8B-C8B), (C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B), (C5-C7B)
665
636
γ
t(CH2) + δ(CC)/(C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B) + (C6B-C4) + (C5-C7B)
626
592
γ
t(C=C)/(N2-C2, C3-N1)
603
Γ(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
534
534
ν, stretching; δ, in-plane bending; γ, out-of-plane bending; s, symmetric; as, asymmetric; sc, scissoring; r, rocking; t, twisting; w, wagging.Table 5
The experimental and theoretical vibrational wave numbers for the infrared spectra of1,3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LC) with its symbolled and numbered atoms in Figure 1(c).
Vibrational assignments/vibrating atoms
Theory
Experiment
ν(OH)/(O3C-H3C)
3685
3416
ν(OH)/(O4C-H4C)
3643
ν(CH2)/(C5-H5)
3328
3268–2677
ν(CH2)/(C4-H4)
3311
ν(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
3292
ν(CH3)/(C10-H″10C)
3046
ν(CH2)/(C5-H′5)
2983
ν(CH2)/(C4-H′4)
2949
ν
as(CH3)/(C10C-H10C, H′10C-C10C)
2904
ν
as(CH2)/(C7C-H7C, H′7C-C7C)
2836
ν
as(CH2)/(C6C-H6C, H′6C-C6C)
2828
ν
s(CH2)/(C6C-H6C, H′6C-C6C)
2752
ν
s(CH2)/(C7C-H7C, H′7C-C7C)
2739
ν(CH)/(C2-H2)
2706
2663
ν
s(COOH) + νs(OH)/(C9C-O1C, O2C-C8C), (O3C-H3C, H4C-O4C)
1785
1774
ν
as(COOH) + νas(OH)/(C9C-O1C, O2C-C8C), (O3C-H3C, H4C-O4C)
1783
ν
as(CN)/(C1-N1, N2-C1)
1756
ν
as(CN) + ν(CC) + ν(CN)/(C1-N1, N2-C5), (C6C-C4), (N2-C4)
1679
1662
ν
s(CN) + ν(C=C) + ν(CC)/(C1-N1, N2-C1), (C2-C3), (C3-C10C), (C4-N2)
1642
γ
t(CH2) + ν(CN)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5), (N1-C3)
1510
1576
γ
t(CH2) + ν(CN)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (N2-C2)
1476
1561
δ
sc(CH2) + δsc(CH3)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C6C-H6C,H′6C-C6C), (C10C-H10C, C10C-H″10C)
1434
1468
γ(CH3)/(C10C-H′10C)
1398
1393
δ(CH) + γt(CH2) + δ(NCHN)/(C2-H2) + (C4-H4, H′4-C4)+(C5-H5, H′5-C5) + (C1-H1)
1305
1317
δ(OH) + ν(CO)/(O4C-H4C), (C8C-O4C)
1259
1282
δ(CH) + ν(CC) + ν(CN)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2), (C3-C10C), (N2-C4)
1239
1235
δ(CH) + ν(CC) + νs (CN)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2), (C3-C10C), (N2-C4,C5-N1)
1221
γ
t(CH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C6C-H6C, H′6C-C6C)
1191
1199
γ
t(CH2)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C7C-H7C, H′7C-C7C)
1181
γ
w(CH2) + δ(OH)/(C6C-H6C, H′6C-C6C), (O4C-H4C)
1149
1157
γ
w(CH2) + δ(OH)/(C7C-H7C, H′7C-C7C), (O3C-H3C)
1139
ν(CC)/(C5-C7C)
1086
1099
ν(CC)/(C4-C6C)
1074
δ(CH3)/(C10-H10C, C10-H′10C, C10-H″10C)
1046
1031
γ(CH3) + γ(NCHN) + γ(CH)/(C10-H10C, C10-H’10C, C10-H″10C), (C1-H1), (C2-H2)
953
990
γ
w(CH2) + δr(CH2)/(C6C-H6C, H′6C-C6C), (C4-H4, H′4-C4)
940
931
ν(CC) + δr(CH2)/(C3-C10), (C7C-C9C), (C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C6C-H6C, H′6C-C6C)
807
836
γ(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
786
γ
t(C=C) + δ(OH)/(N2-C2, C3-N1) + (O4C-H4C)
624
629
δ(OH)/(O4C-H4C)
470
462
δ(OH)/(O3C-H3C)
424
ν, stretching; δ, in-plane bending; γ, out-of-plane bending; s, symmetric; as, asymmetric; sc, scissoring; r, rocking; t, twisting; w, wagging.Table 6
The experimental and theoretical vibrational wave numbers for the infrared spectra of3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LD) with its symbolled and numbered atoms in Figure 1(d).
Vibrational assignments/vibrating atoms
Theory
Experiment
ν(OH)/(O2D-H2D)
3590
3423
ν
as(NH2)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D)
3446
ν(CH2)/(C4-H4)
3381
3222–2666
ν
s(NH2)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D)
3370
ν(CH2)/(C5-H5)
3154
ν(CH2)/(C8D-H8D)
3152
—
ν(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
2995
ν(CH2)/(C6D-H6D)
2890
ν
s(CH)/(C2-H2, H3-C3)
2857
ν
as(CH2)/(C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D)
2850
ν
as(CH) + νs(CH2)/(C2-H2, H3-C3), (C5-H5, H′5-C5)
2828
ν
s(CH2)/(C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D)
2789
ν(CH2)/(C4-H′4)
2752
ν(CH2)/(C8D-H′8D)
2709
ν(COOH)/(C9D-O1D)
1728
1745
ν
s(CN) + ν(C=C)/(C1-N1, N2-C1), (C2-C3)
1668
1642
ν
as(CN) + δr(CH)/(C1-N1, N2-C1), (C2-H2, H3-C3)
1601
1585
δ
sc(NH2)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D)
1582
ν
s(CN)/(C1-N1, N2-C1)
1468
1470
δ
sc(CH2)/(C6D-H6D, H′6D-C6D)
1454
δ
sc(CH2)/(C8D-H8D, H′8D-C8D)
1443
1419
δ
sc(CH2) + γw(CH2)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D)
1430
δ
sc(CH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4)
1423
γ
w(CH2) + ν(CC) + ν(CO)/(C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D), (C7D-C9D) + (C9D-O2D)
1417
1354
δ
sc(CH2)/(C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D)
1404
δ(NCHN) + δr(CH)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2, H3-C3)
1372
γ
w(CH2) + ν(CC)/(C4-H4,H′4-C4), (C6D-H6D, H′6D-C6D), (C6D-C8D)
1369
γ
w(CH2) + γt(NH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C6D-H6D,H′6D-C6D), (N3D-H3D,H′3D-N3D)
1348
1318
γ
w(CH2)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D)
1344
δ
r(CH) + γt(CH2) + γw(CH2)/(C2-H2, H3-C3), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C8D-H8D, H′8D-C8D)
1314
1297
δ(NCHN) + δr(CH) + δ(OH)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2, H3-C3), (O2D-H2D)
1298
γ
w(CH2) + δ(OH)/(C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D), (O2D-H2D)
1283
γ
t(NH2) + γt(CH2)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D), (C6D-H6D, H′6D-C6D)
1266
1225
γ
t(NH2)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D)
1209
δ
sc(CH) + δ(CH) + γt(CH2)/(C2-H2, H3-C3), (C1-H1), (C4-H4, H′4-C4)
1178
1174
δ
sc(CH)/(C2-H2, H3-C3)
1148
1119
δ(NCHN) + γw(CH2) + δ(OH)/(C1-H1), (C7D-H7D,H′7D-C7D), (O2D-H2D)
1139
δ(NCHN) + γt(CH2) + γt(NH2)/(C1-H1), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D)
1111
1098
γ
t(NH2) + δsc(CH) + νas(CN)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D), (C2-H2,H3-C3), (C4-N2, N1-C5)
1070
1069
ν(CC)/(C5-C7D)
1037
1033
γ
w(NH2) + ν(CC) + ν(CN)/(N3D-H3D,H′3D-N3D), (C6D-C4), (C4-N2)
1034
γ
t(CH)/(C2-H2,H3-C3)
973
976
γ
w(CH2) + δr(CH2) + δ(OH)/(C7D-H7D,H′7D-C7D), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (O2D-H2D)
960
γ
t(NH2) + ν(CC)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D), (C6D-C8D)
948
γ(NCHN) + γw(CH)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2,H3-C3)
918
954
γ
t(NH2) + ν(CN) + δr(CH2)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D), (N3D-C8D), (C6D-H6D, H′6D-C6D)
818
846
ν
s(CC) + ν(CO) + δ(OH)/(C5-C7D,C7D-C9D), (C9D-O2D), (O2D-H2D)
801
767
γ
t(C=C) + δ(OH)/(C2-C3), (O2D-H2D)
663
637
δ(OH) + δr(CH2)/(O2D-H2D), (C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D)
530
—
ν, stretching; δ, in-plane bending; γ, out-of-plane bending; s, symmetric; as, asymmetric; sc, scissoring; r, rocking; t, twisting; w, wagging.The intermolecular interactions and the correlations of close frequency IR signals cause the -OH, -CH, -CH2, -CH3, and -NH2 stretching vibrations to appear under broad peaks in the experimental spectra. These broad peaks are in very well-defined frequency region. The vibrations coming from the other functional groups of the imidazole rings and the aliphatic chains including the other vibrations of the hydrogenic groups in all modes appeared in 1750–450 cm−1 region.The first vibration signals observed in the 1800–1700 cm−1 region of the experimental spectra of LB, LC, and LD are distinct peaks arising from ν(C=O) stretching as their values in agreement with the previously observed ν(C=O) stretching [25] and theoretically calculated values as reflected in Table 3. The imidazole ν(C=N) stretching of LA appears as individual signals while they are coupled under broad peaks with LB, LC, and LD molecules as seen about 1650 cm−1 while the frequencies for ν(C=N) stretching are in agreements with the corresponding data as given in [26]. The aliphatic ν(C-N) stretching in 1069–1235 cm−1 interval and the aliphatic ν(C-C) stretching in 917–1099 cm−1 are consistent with the previous corresponding measurements [27].Beyond the consistency of the common imidazole properties of the molecules, we also give unique infrared signals of molecules in Table3. C-O stretching belong to the H2C-OH group in LA, in-plane δ vibrations of CH3 at the end of the aliphatic chain of LB, and at the attachment of the imidazole ring of LC are such unique vibrations. The calculated and observed wave numbers of these vibrations are consistent with the concerning previous studies [28, 29].The molecules in consideration analyzed by infrared spectrum because of the lack of exchangeable protons of -OH and -NH2 in the NMR spectra of the chemicals and the existence of these groups is proved in the molecules. Also, the IR spectra of the molecules reverifies the theoretically obtained configurations of them as they were first verified by the comparison the theoretical NMR spectra with that of the experimental NMR spectra.


### 3.4. Antibacterial and Cytotoxic Activities

The antibacterial tests of the synthesized four molecules were run on the six different bacteria and yeast, as mentioned in Section2.3.1. Figures 2(a) and 3(b) show the inhibitory effects of the various concentrations of the LA and LB on Candida albicans ATCC 10231 and Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778 (Gram positive) together with that of the antibiotic controls. Their effects on Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Gram negative), Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115 are excluded because of their very weak efficacy in comparison with that of the antibiotic control. Although the absorbance measurements involve some statistical errors, LA showed better inhibition than the antibiotic on Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, while both chemicals are effective on the selected bacteria and yeast as much as the antibiotics. LC and LD show no noticeable inhibitory effects on the target bacteria, and thus, their absorbance values as function of their concentration were not given for the sake of brevity.Figure 2
(a) The antibacterial activity onCandida albicans. The first bars on the left are for the commercial antibiotic inhibition for each dose. The second bars are for 1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide (LA), and the third bars are for 3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1- (3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LB), (b) same as in Figure 2(a), but for the antibacterial activity on Bacillus cereus.
(a)
(b)Figure 3
(a) The cytotoxicity of1,3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide. The first bars represent the effect on healthy mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line for each dose, as do the second bars on human cervical cancer cell line, and the third bars on human liver cancer cell line, (b) same as in Figure 3(a), but for the cytotoxicity of 3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide.
(a)
(b)Figure3(a) shows the cytotoxic activity of LC on HeLa and Hep G2 cell lines against healthy MEF cell lines, as does Figure 3(b) for the cytotoxic activity of LD. The cytotoxic activities of LA and LB are not exhibited as they showed lesser cytotoxic activities in comparison with LC and LD. The percentage cell viability of HeLa and Hep G2 cell lines was significantly reduced by LC and LD at the end of 24 hr application of the doses. In addition, LC did not harm the healthy MEF cell lines for any dose so that its half inhibitory concentrations (IC50) cannot be calculated. Meantime, LD showed some activity on the MEF cells with the high doses together with the fact that the activity was not as strong as it did on the cancer cell lines.The antibacterial and cytotoxic effectiveness of the synthesized molecules are summarized in Table7 by presenting their IC50 concentrations in the units of µM on the bacteria together with the IC50 values of the antibiotics and on the cancer cell lines. The lack of the IC50 values of LC and LD for antibacterial activity in Table 7 indicates that the IC50 values of them cannot be calculated due to their very weak effect on the bacteria sample within the dose range considered. LA and LB were, respectively, thrice and twice more effective on Bacillus cereus than the antibiotic (gentamicin) as the LA equals the antibiotic (amphotericin-b) effect on Candida albicans.Table 7
Half inhibition concentrations of the molecules on the selected bacteria and cancer cell lines.
Antibacterial activity IC50 (µM)
Cytotoxic activity IC50 (µM)
Escherichia coli O157:H7
Candida albicans
Bacillus cereus
HeLa
Hep G2
MEF
L
A
32
30
17
316
100
—
L
B
39
156
29
141
182
—
L
C
—
—
—
81
150
—
L
D
—
—
—
167
57
—
Antibiotic
10
30
56
—
—
—
L
A, 1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide; LB, 3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide; LC, 1,3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide; LD 3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide; IC50, half inhibitory concentrations; HeLa, human cervical cancer cell line; Hep G2, human liver cancer cell line; MEF, healthy mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line.The cell viability assay of the chemicals exhibits no harmful effect on the healthy MEF cell lines as their IC50 values cannot be calculated within the dose range considered. The LC inhibition on HeLa and the LD inhibition on Hep G2 are distinctive when they are compared with the inhibition of the other imidazole-based chemicals on different cancer cell lines in the concerning studies. The IC50 values of the LC on HeLa and the LD on Hep G2 were 81 µM and 57 µM, respectively. The similar imidazole compounds which have alkyl moieties were tested on the cancer cells different from the cells used in this study [8]. The IC50 values of 1-(benzofuran-2-yl(phenyl)methyl)-3-allyl-2-ethyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide and 1-(benzofuran-2-yl(phenyl)methyl)-3-butyl-2-ethyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium iodide on leukemia (HL-60), lung carcinoma (A549), colon carcinoma (SW480), breast carcinoma (MCF-7), and myeloid liver carcinoma (SMMC-7721) cancer lines have been detected over 40 µM. Additionally, the IC50 activity of 3β-hydroxy-21-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)pregna-5,16-dien-20-one on prostate cancer (PC-3), breast cancer (MCF7), and lung cancer (SK-LU- 1) were 20 µM, 19 µM, and 18 µM, respectively [7]. These results are quantitatively better than 81 µM and 57 µM on Hep G2 and HeLa. However, this is compensated by the fact that the LC and LD have not any harmful effect on the healthy MEF cell lines.


## 3.1. Molecular Structures

The NMR measurements were taken in dilute D2O solution, while the IR spectra were recorded in the solid KBr pellet. Therefore, NMR and infrared spectra may reflect different molecular structures as the molecule surrounded by D2O molecules in NMR spectra while the intermolecular interactions exist in the IR spectra, especially on -CH and -OH bonds [22]. On the theoretical calculation side, the crystalline phase calculations were excluded due to the single crystal form of the molecules obtained for X-ray analysis. The gas phase calculations were adopted considering differences with other phases with 2% maximum error margin which were especially on the -CH and -OH bond lengths.The process of the theoretical modeling of the molecules has initially been realized by using the potential energy surface scanning method for the selected dihedral angles of each molecule, thus obtaining the lowest energy conformers in the gas phase, and the resulting optimized conformers are given in Scheme1. The imidazole rings except that of LC with its CH3 attachment and the CH2 groups directly bonded to the nitrogen of the rings are common in the all molecules.Scheme 1
Optimized conformers of the synthesized imidazole molecules with their labeled and numbered atoms: (a) 1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide, (b) 3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide, (c) 1,3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide, and (d) 3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)L
A has the point group symmetry C2 as the other molecules were found to have C1 symmetry. The lower point group symmetry of the LB, LC, and LD in comparison with the C2 symmetry of LA is because of the attachment of the different aliphatic chains to their imidazole rings. The calculated optimized energies and the dipole moments of LA, LD, LB, and LC are, respectively, −534.4, −667.3, −706.6, and −800.5 in units of a.u. and 2.11, 3.41, 4.54, and 7.78 in units of Debye.The calculated parameters of the common properties of the molecules are presented in Table1. Although the molecules differ from each other by their moieties bonded to the imidazole rings, the bond lengths, the bond angles, and the dihedral angles belong to the ring, and its immediate vicinity are in good agreement with each other and with the corresponding X-ray diffractometer (XRD) results of previously investigated similar molecule 1,3-bis(acetamide)imidazol-3-ium bromide which was crystallized successfully [22]. The dihedral angles chosen on the imidazole ring are either about 0° or 180°, implying the aromatic structure as expected. The C-N bond lengths which bind the rings and the aliphatic moieties, that is, C4-N2 and N1-C5 are equal in LA reflecting the symmetric structure of the molecule. However, these are different in LB, LC, and LD because of the different moieties on the both side of their aromatic rings. Although the symmetry of LC was broken by the C-CH3 group instead of C-H in the ring, no drastic changes were observed in the concerning ring parameters. It can be inferred that the common geometrical parameters are consistent with each other with a priori theoretical confirmations before NMR and IR spectra clarifications of the calculated molecular structures.Table 1
Some selected geometrical parameters of the common properties of the investigated molecules.
L
A
L
B
L
C
L
D
L
Selected bond lengths (Å)
C1-H1
1.102
1.043
1.061
1.095
0.976
C1-N1
1.295
1.301
—
—
1.312 (7)
C3-N1
1.403
1.398
1.335
1.396
1.374 (8)
C2-C3
1.297
1.332
1.366
1.314
1.312 (10)
C4-N2
1.464
1.437
1.418
1.523
1.444 (8)
N1-C5
1.464
1.474
1.429
1.505
1.444 (8)
C7B-O1B
—
1.204
—
—
1.241 (8)
N3B(D)-H3B(D)
—
1.015
—
1.013
1.010
Selected bond angles (°)
N1-C1-N2
108.7
112.6
111.7
108.9
109.2 (6)
C1-N1-C3
108.9
105.7
108.9
108.6
107.9 (5)
C1-N1-C5
125.1
127.6
126.0
126.0
126.2 (5)
C4-N2-C1
125.1
126.5
126.9
125.2
126.2 (5)
H2-C2-N2
122.6
121.8
121.8
122.3
123.4
C3-C2-H2
130.6
129.4
129.9
130.5
128.2
Selected dihedral angles (°)
C4-N2-C1-N1
177.5
179.2
179.6
178.6
178.4 (5)
N2-C2-C3-N1
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.9 (8)
C5-N1-C1-N2
177.5
175.1
179.1
179.6
178.4 (5)
C5-N1-C3-C2
177.7
175.2
179.8
179.7
177.9 (6)
The data of the molecule showed byL in the last column reflect the X-ray diffraction measurements and calculated values on 1,3-bis(acetamide)imidazol-3-ium bromide as given in [22]. The numbers in the paranthesis indicates the experimental error margins on the specific measurements. The labeled and numbered atoms in the first column are presented for each molecule in Scheme 1.


## 3.2. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra

The experimental and theoretical chemical shifts of1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of LA, LB, LC, and LD molecules are given in Table 2. The calculations were carried out in the gas phase considering their optimized geometries given in Scheme 1. The proton signals for -NH2 and -OH in all were absent in the experimental 1H NMR spectra because the solvent was D2O concerning the solubility of the specimens which exchanged NH2 and OH protons with deuterium. Although their detailed analysis left to the IR spectra in the following section, the calculated shifts δ 1.73 ppm of OH in LA and δ 0.5 ppm and δ 0.7 ppm of NH2 in LB and LD, respectively, are in the typical chemical shift range of R-NH2 and R-OH groups.Table 2
Proton and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance spectral data of the molecules.
Assignment
Proton chemical shift (ppm)
Assignment
Carbon chemical shift (ppm)
Experimental
Theory
Experimental
Theory
1,3-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide (LA)
s, 1H, NCHN
9.06
9.06
NCHN
136.33
137.66
d, 2H, HC=CH
7.70
7.32
HC=CH
122.60
123.06
t, 4H, N-CH2
3.93
4.01
O-CH2
59.75
61.68
t, 4H, O-CH2
3.82
3.87
N-CH2
51.98
52.59
s. 2H, OH
—
1.73
—
—
—
3-(2-Ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LB)
s, 1H, NCHN
7.79
7.73
CO
171.85
172.23
d, 1H, HC=CH
7.25
7.23
NCHN
136.78
137.10
d, 1H, HC=CH
7.02
7.00
HC=CH
125.13
124.74
s, 2H, N-CH2 CO
4.23
4.22 (2)
HC=CH
120.73
121.34
q, 2H, CH2-CH3
3.23
3.21 (3)
O-CH2-CH3
60.78
57.36
t, 2H, N-CH2-C
2.95
2.96 (3)
N-CH2
54.97
54.10
t, 2H, NH2-CH2
2.55
2.54 (2)
N-CH2-CH2-
44.97
38.64
m, 2H, C-CH2-C
2.20
2.18 (2)
NH2-CH2-
36.84
36.61
t, 3H, CH3
2.02
2.04 (3)
C-CH2-C
28.72
31.52
NH2
—
0.5 (3)
CH3
13.64
17.70
1,3-Bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LC)
s, 1H, NCHN
8.84
8.83
COOH
173.03
170.3 (1)
s, 1H, HC=C-CH3
7.33
7.34
NCHN
133.30
132.96
s, OH
—
5.95 (2)
C-CH3
129.94
130.93
t, 4H, N-CH2
3.64
3.62 (5)
C=C-CH3
116.01
119.67
N-CH2
37.53
39.7 (9)
t, 4H, CH2-COOH
2.91
3.10 (2)
CH2-COOH
26.79
33.8 (5)
s, 3H, -CH3
2.38
2.37
CH3
9.01
10.26
3-(2-Carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LD)
s, 1H, NCHN
9.11
9.11
COOH
170.21
177.74
d, 1H, HC=CH
7.72
7.71
NCHN
137.16
137.47
d, 1H, HC=CH
7.65
7.63
HC=CH
123.94
124.97
s, OH
—
6.39
HC=CH
121.50
124.69
t, 4H, N-CH2
4.45
4.47 (1)
N-CH2
60.01
60.29
t, 2H, COOH-C
3.33
3.34
N-CH2
52.02
53.30
t, 2H, NH2-CH2
3.05
3.03
NH2-CH2
45.42
45.41
m, 2H, C-CH2-C
2.33
2.31
C-CH2-C
36.18
40.05
NH2
—
0.7 (3)
COOH-CH2
27.76
34.43The imidazole proton (NCHN, H1) shifts of LA, LC, and LD with 9.06 ppm, 8.84 ppm, and 9.11 ppm, respectively, are noticeably bigger than that of LB with 7.79 ppm. That can be due to the intramolecular interactions of the NCHN hydrogen with the close oxygen atoms since the oxygen reduces the electron density on the hydrogen depending on the distance between them, thus causing higher NMR shifts. Indeed, the H1-O1A in LA, the H1-O1C in LC, and the H1-O1D in LD are 2.61 Å, 2.42 Å, and 2.41 Å, respectively. These distances which were measured from the theoretical models of the molecules are quite longer than that 2.85 Å distance of the H1-O1B measured in LB which results in small shifts for the H1 of LB. This is supported by the fact that the other imidazole proton shifts of H2 and H3 are all in close values about 7.7 ppm for all molecules as no distinct intermolecular interactions possible on H2 and H3 in any of them. In addition, the NMR signals of CH2 protons in the aliphatic chains of all molecules and the smallest proton shifts of CH3 protons in LB and LC molecules are theoretically and experimentally in agreement with the expected NMR results. These NMR data are in accordance with the previous study on a similar imidazole salt [23, 24] in which the protons belong to the aliphatic chain found in 4.15 ppm–2.08 ppm, the carbons belong to the imidazole ring, and the aliphatic chain is found in 139.2 ppm–123 ppm and 62.5 ppm–33.9 ppm as in this study.The eightR-squared tests using the data in Table 2 provide least 99.8% agreement between the experimental and the theoretical 1H and 13C NMR for LA, LB, LC, and LD. The theoretical results for NMR are in very good agreement with the experimental results as well as the observation of the expected specific values. Thus, one can infer that the calculated atomic configurations of the all molecules are good estimations except the exclusion of the interchangeable hydrogens.


## 3.3. Infrared Spectra

In Figure1, the experimental infrared spectra of LA, LB, LC, and LD in the 450–4000 cm−1 region are given against their IR spectra calculations. The detailed account of the IR spectra including the in-plane vibrations of the stretching, scissoring, and rocking and the out-of-plane vibrations of the wagging and twisting for each molecule is presented for LA, LB, LC, and LD in Tables 3–6, respectively. The R-square test results exhibit 99.8%, 99.5%, 99.5%, and 99.7% agreement between the experimental and the theoretical IR spectra of LA, LB, LC, and LD, respectively.Figure 1
Calculated (bold lines) and experimental (pale lines) infrared spectra of the synthesized imidazole molecules: (a)1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide, (b) 3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide, (c) 1,3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide, and (d) 3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide.Table 3
The experimental and theoretical vibrational wave numbers for the infrared spectra of1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide (LA) with its symbolled and numbered atoms in Figure 1(a).
Vibrational assignments/vibrating atoms
Theory
Experiment
ν
s(OH)/(O1A-H1A, H2A-O2A)
3477
3358
ν
as(OH)/(O1A-H1A, H2A-O2A)
3477
ν
as(CH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C5-H5,H′5-C5)
3093
3114–2822
ν
as(CH2)/(C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A)
3011
ν(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
2949
ν
s(CH)/(C2-H2, H3-C3)
2928
ν
s(CH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C5-H5, H′5-C5)
2914
ν
as(CH)/(C2-H2, H3-C3)
2899
ν
s(CH2)/(C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A)
2880
2808
ν
as(CN)/(C1-N1,N2-C1)
1682
1630
ν
s(CN)/(C1-N1,N2-C1)
1543
1592
δ
sc(CH2)/(C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A)
1452
1463
δ
sc(CH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C5-H5, H′5-C5)
1428
δ(OH)/(O1A-H1A), (O2A-H2A)
1411
γ
t(CH2) + δr(CH) + δ(NCHN)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C2-H2, C3-H3), (C1-H1)
1375
1373
γ
w(CH2) + νs(CN)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A), (C4-N2, N1-C5)
1355
1330
δ
r(CH)/(C2-H2, H3-C3)
1345
γ
t(CH2) + δ(NCHN) + δr(CH)/(C6A-H6A,H′6A-C6A), (C1-H1), (C2-H2, H3-C3)
1323
1301
γ
t(CH2) + δ(NCHN) + δr(CH)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C1-H1), (C2-H2, H3-C3)
1313
δ(NCHN) + γw(OH)/(C1-H1), (O1A-H1A, H2A-O2A)
1274
1265
γ
t(CH2) + δr(OH)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (O1A-H1A, O2A-H2A)
1212
γ
t(CH2) + δr(OH)/(C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A), (O1A-H1A, O2A-H2A)
1209
δ
sc(CH)/(C2-H2, H3-C3)
1149
1179
ν
as(CN)/(C3-N1, N2-C2) + (C4-N2, N1-C5)
1143
ν
as(CO) + νas(CC)/(C6A-O2A, O1A-C7A), (C6A-C4, C5-C7A)
1077
1080
ν
s(CO) + νs(CC)/(C6A-O2A, O1A-C7A), (C6A-C4, C5-C7A)
1076
δ
r(CH2) + νs(CO)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C6A-O2A, C7A-O1A)
1047
δ
r (CH2) + νs (CN)/(C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A), (C3-N1, N2-C2)
997
956
γ(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
946
ν
s(CC)/(C6A-C4, C5-C7A)
930
917
δ
r(CH2) + νas(CO)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C6A-O2A, O1A-C7A)
867
875
δ
r(CH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A)
861
γ
w(CH) + γ(NCHN)/(C2-H2, H3-C3), (C1-H1)
853
840
ν
as(CN) + δr(CH2)/(N2-C4, N1-C5), (C6A-H6A, H′6A-C6A), (C7A-H7A, H′7A-C7A)
677
673
γ(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
617
639
ν, stretching; δ, in-plane bending; γ, out-of-plane bending; s, symmetric; as, asymmetric; sc, scissoring; r, rocking; t, twisting; w, wagging.Table 4
The experimental and theoretical vibrational wave numbers for the infrared spectra of3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LB) with its symbolled and numbered atoms in Figure 1(b).
Vibrational assignments/vibrating atoms
Theory
Experiment
ν(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
3460
3400
ν
as(NH2)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B)
3412
ν
s(NH2)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B)
3345
ν
as(CH2)/(C9B-H9B, H′9B-C9B)
3327
3192–2720
ν
s(CH2) + νs(CH2)/(C1-H5, H′5-C1), (C9B-H9B, H′9B-C9B)
3270
ν (CH2)/(C4-H′4)
3263
ν (CH2)/(C8B-H8B)
3226
ν
as(CH2)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5)
3221
ν
s(CH2)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5)
3157
ν(CH)/(C3-H3)
3087
ν(CH)/(C2-H2)
2946
ν
as(CH2)/(C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B)
2843
ν
s(CH2)/(C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B)
2795
ν
as(CH3)/(C10B-H10B, H′10B-C10B)
2784
ν
as(CH3)/(C10B-H10B, H″10B-C10B)
2783
ν
s(CH3)/(C10B-H10B, H′10B-C10B, H″10B-C10B)
2731
ν(CH2)/(C8B-H′8B)
2606
2618
ν(CO)/(C7B-O1B)
1707
1753
ν(CN) + δ(CH) + ν(C=C)/(C1-N2), (C2-H2), (C2-C3)
1652
1645
ν(CN) + ν(C=C)/(C1-N1), (C2-C3)
1619
δ
sc(NH2)/(C3B-H3B, H′3B-C3B)
1606
ν
s(CN) + ν(NC)/(N2-C1,C1-N1), (N2-C2)
1494
1561
δ
sc(CH3) + δ(CH3)/(C10B-H10B, C10B-H″10B), (C10B-H′10B)
1464
1528
δ
sc(CH2)/(C8B-H8B, H′8B-C8B)
1462
δ
sc(CH3) +  δ(CH3)/(C10B-H′10B, C10B-H″10B), (C10B-H10B)
1451
1473
δ
sc(CH2)/(C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B)
1441
δ
sc(CH2) +  γw(CH3)/(C9B-H9B, H′9B-C9B), (C10B-H10B, C10B-H′10B)
1415
1465
δ
sc(CH2)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5)
1381
1458
γ
w(CH2) + δsc(CH2)/(C8B-H8B, H′8B-C8B), (C4-H4, H′4-C4)
1372
γ
w(CH2) + δsc(CH2)/(C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B), (C4-H4, H′4-C4)
1352
1394
ν
s(CN) + γt(CH2)/(C4-N2, N1-C5), (C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B), (C5-H5, H′5-C5)
1319
1300
γ
w(CH2)/(C9B-H9B, H′9B-C9B)
1309
γ
t(NH2) + γt(CH2)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B), (C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B)
1296
1242
δ(NCHN) + δr(CH)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2, C3-H3)
1282
ν
as(CO) + γw(CH2)/(C7B-O2B, O2B-C9B), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C9B-H9B, H′9B-C9B)
1248
1214
ν
as(CO) + γw(CH3)/(C7B-O2B, O2B-C9B), (C10B-H10B, C10B-H″10B)
1198
1183
ν
as(CC) + ν(CO) + νs(CN)/(C8B-C6B, C6B-C4), (C3B-O2B), (C4-N2, N1-C5)
1123
1118
ν
s(CO) + ν(CC) + δ(NCHN)/(C7B-O2B, O2B-C9B), (C9B-C10B), (C7B-C5), (C1-H1)
1069
1097
γ
w(NH2) + δr(CH2)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B), (C8B-H8B, H′8B-C8B)
1011
1039
γ
w(NH2) + ν(CC)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B)  + (C6B-C4)
869
931
ν(CC) + γw(CH3) + ν(CO)/(C5-C7B), (C10B-H10B, C10B-H′10B), (C7B-O2B)
860
852
γ
w(NH2) + ν(CC)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B), (C4-C6B)
824
787
γ(NCHN) + γw(CH)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2, C3-H3)
797
765
γ
w(CH) + γt(NH2) + γt(CN)/(C2-H2, C3-H3), (N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B), (N1-C5)
759
700
γ
t(NH2) γt(CN) + γ(NCHN)/(N3B-H3B, H′3B-N3B), (N2-C4), (C1-H1)
722
652
γ
t(CH2) + δ(CC)/(C8B-H8B, H′8B-C8B), (C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B), (C5-C7B)
665
636
γ
t(CH2) + δ(CC)/(C6B-H6B, H′6B-C6B) + (C6B-C4) + (C5-C7B)
626
592
γ
t(C=C)/(N2-C2, C3-N1)
603
Γ(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
534
534
ν, stretching; δ, in-plane bending; γ, out-of-plane bending; s, symmetric; as, asymmetric; sc, scissoring; r, rocking; t, twisting; w, wagging.Table 5
The experimental and theoretical vibrational wave numbers for the infrared spectra of1,3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LC) with its symbolled and numbered atoms in Figure 1(c).
Vibrational assignments/vibrating atoms
Theory
Experiment
ν(OH)/(O3C-H3C)
3685
3416
ν(OH)/(O4C-H4C)
3643
ν(CH2)/(C5-H5)
3328
3268–2677
ν(CH2)/(C4-H4)
3311
ν(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
3292
ν(CH3)/(C10-H″10C)
3046
ν(CH2)/(C5-H′5)
2983
ν(CH2)/(C4-H′4)
2949
ν
as(CH3)/(C10C-H10C, H′10C-C10C)
2904
ν
as(CH2)/(C7C-H7C, H′7C-C7C)
2836
ν
as(CH2)/(C6C-H6C, H′6C-C6C)
2828
ν
s(CH2)/(C6C-H6C, H′6C-C6C)
2752
ν
s(CH2)/(C7C-H7C, H′7C-C7C)
2739
ν(CH)/(C2-H2)
2706
2663
ν
s(COOH) + νs(OH)/(C9C-O1C, O2C-C8C), (O3C-H3C, H4C-O4C)
1785
1774
ν
as(COOH) + νas(OH)/(C9C-O1C, O2C-C8C), (O3C-H3C, H4C-O4C)
1783
ν
as(CN)/(C1-N1, N2-C1)
1756
ν
as(CN) + ν(CC) + ν(CN)/(C1-N1, N2-C5), (C6C-C4), (N2-C4)
1679
1662
ν
s(CN) + ν(C=C) + ν(CC)/(C1-N1, N2-C1), (C2-C3), (C3-C10C), (C4-N2)
1642
γ
t(CH2) + ν(CN)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5), (N1-C3)
1510
1576
γ
t(CH2) + ν(CN)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (N2-C2)
1476
1561
δ
sc(CH2) + δsc(CH3)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C6C-H6C,H′6C-C6C), (C10C-H10C, C10C-H″10C)
1434
1468
γ(CH3)/(C10C-H′10C)
1398
1393
δ(CH) + γt(CH2) + δ(NCHN)/(C2-H2) + (C4-H4, H′4-C4)+(C5-H5, H′5-C5) + (C1-H1)
1305
1317
δ(OH) + ν(CO)/(O4C-H4C), (C8C-O4C)
1259
1282
δ(CH) + ν(CC) + ν(CN)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2), (C3-C10C), (N2-C4)
1239
1235
δ(CH) + ν(CC) + νs (CN)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2), (C3-C10C), (N2-C4,C5-N1)
1221
γ
t(CH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C6C-H6C, H′6C-C6C)
1191
1199
γ
t(CH2)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C7C-H7C, H′7C-C7C)
1181
γ
w(CH2) + δ(OH)/(C6C-H6C, H′6C-C6C), (O4C-H4C)
1149
1157
γ
w(CH2) + δ(OH)/(C7C-H7C, H′7C-C7C), (O3C-H3C)
1139
ν(CC)/(C5-C7C)
1086
1099
ν(CC)/(C4-C6C)
1074
δ(CH3)/(C10-H10C, C10-H′10C, C10-H″10C)
1046
1031
γ(CH3) + γ(NCHN) + γ(CH)/(C10-H10C, C10-H’10C, C10-H″10C), (C1-H1), (C2-H2)
953
990
γ
w(CH2) + δr(CH2)/(C6C-H6C, H′6C-C6C), (C4-H4, H′4-C4)
940
931
ν(CC) + δr(CH2)/(C3-C10), (C7C-C9C), (C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C6C-H6C, H′6C-C6C)
807
836
γ(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
786
γ
t(C=C) + δ(OH)/(N2-C2, C3-N1) + (O4C-H4C)
624
629
δ(OH)/(O4C-H4C)
470
462
δ(OH)/(O3C-H3C)
424
ν, stretching; δ, in-plane bending; γ, out-of-plane bending; s, symmetric; as, asymmetric; sc, scissoring; r, rocking; t, twisting; w, wagging.Table 6
The experimental and theoretical vibrational wave numbers for the infrared spectra of3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LD) with its symbolled and numbered atoms in Figure 1(d).
Vibrational assignments/vibrating atoms
Theory
Experiment
ν(OH)/(O2D-H2D)
3590
3423
ν
as(NH2)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D)
3446
ν(CH2)/(C4-H4)
3381
3222–2666
ν
s(NH2)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D)
3370
ν(CH2)/(C5-H5)
3154
ν(CH2)/(C8D-H8D)
3152
—
ν(NCHN)/(C1-H1)
2995
ν(CH2)/(C6D-H6D)
2890
ν
s(CH)/(C2-H2, H3-C3)
2857
ν
as(CH2)/(C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D)
2850
ν
as(CH) + νs(CH2)/(C2-H2, H3-C3), (C5-H5, H′5-C5)
2828
ν
s(CH2)/(C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D)
2789
ν(CH2)/(C4-H′4)
2752
ν(CH2)/(C8D-H′8D)
2709
ν(COOH)/(C9D-O1D)
1728
1745
ν
s(CN) + ν(C=C)/(C1-N1, N2-C1), (C2-C3)
1668
1642
ν
as(CN) + δr(CH)/(C1-N1, N2-C1), (C2-H2, H3-C3)
1601
1585
δ
sc(NH2)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D)
1582
ν
s(CN)/(C1-N1, N2-C1)
1468
1470
δ
sc(CH2)/(C6D-H6D, H′6D-C6D)
1454
δ
sc(CH2)/(C8D-H8D, H′8D-C8D)
1443
1419
δ
sc(CH2) + γw(CH2)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D)
1430
δ
sc(CH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4)
1423
γ
w(CH2) + ν(CC) + ν(CO)/(C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D), (C7D-C9D) + (C9D-O2D)
1417
1354
δ
sc(CH2)/(C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D)
1404
δ(NCHN) + δr(CH)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2, H3-C3)
1372
γ
w(CH2) + ν(CC)/(C4-H4,H′4-C4), (C6D-H6D, H′6D-C6D), (C6D-C8D)
1369
γ
w(CH2) + γt(NH2)/(C4-H4, H′4-C4), (C6D-H6D,H′6D-C6D), (N3D-H3D,H′3D-N3D)
1348
1318
γ
w(CH2)/(C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D)
1344
δ
r(CH) + γt(CH2) + γw(CH2)/(C2-H2, H3-C3), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (C8D-H8D, H′8D-C8D)
1314
1297
δ(NCHN) + δr(CH) + δ(OH)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2, H3-C3), (O2D-H2D)
1298
γ
w(CH2) + δ(OH)/(C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D), (O2D-H2D)
1283
γ
t(NH2) + γt(CH2)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D), (C6D-H6D, H′6D-C6D)
1266
1225
γ
t(NH2)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D)
1209
δ
sc(CH) + δ(CH) + γt(CH2)/(C2-H2, H3-C3), (C1-H1), (C4-H4, H′4-C4)
1178
1174
δ
sc(CH)/(C2-H2, H3-C3)
1148
1119
δ(NCHN) + γw(CH2) + δ(OH)/(C1-H1), (C7D-H7D,H′7D-C7D), (O2D-H2D)
1139
δ(NCHN) + γt(CH2) + γt(NH2)/(C1-H1), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D)
1111
1098
γ
t(NH2) + δsc(CH) + νas(CN)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D), (C2-H2,H3-C3), (C4-N2, N1-C5)
1070
1069
ν(CC)/(C5-C7D)
1037
1033
γ
w(NH2) + ν(CC) + ν(CN)/(N3D-H3D,H′3D-N3D), (C6D-C4), (C4-N2)
1034
γ
t(CH)/(C2-H2,H3-C3)
973
976
γ
w(CH2) + δr(CH2) + δ(OH)/(C7D-H7D,H′7D-C7D), (C5-H5, H′5-C5), (O2D-H2D)
960
γ
t(NH2) + ν(CC)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D), (C6D-C8D)
948
γ(NCHN) + γw(CH)/(C1-H1), (C2-H2,H3-C3)
918
954
γ
t(NH2) + ν(CN) + δr(CH2)/(N3D-H3D, H′3D-N3D), (N3D-C8D), (C6D-H6D, H′6D-C6D)
818
846
ν
s(CC) + ν(CO) + δ(OH)/(C5-C7D,C7D-C9D), (C9D-O2D), (O2D-H2D)
801
767
γ
t(C=C) + δ(OH)/(C2-C3), (O2D-H2D)
663
637
δ(OH) + δr(CH2)/(O2D-H2D), (C7D-H7D, H′7D-C7D)
530
—
ν, stretching; δ, in-plane bending; γ, out-of-plane bending; s, symmetric; as, asymmetric; sc, scissoring; r, rocking; t, twisting; w, wagging.The intermolecular interactions and the correlations of close frequency IR signals cause the -OH, -CH, -CH2, -CH3, and -NH2 stretching vibrations to appear under broad peaks in the experimental spectra. These broad peaks are in very well-defined frequency region. The vibrations coming from the other functional groups of the imidazole rings and the aliphatic chains including the other vibrations of the hydrogenic groups in all modes appeared in 1750–450 cm−1 region.The first vibration signals observed in the 1800–1700 cm−1 region of the experimental spectra of LB, LC, and LD are distinct peaks arising from ν(C=O) stretching as their values in agreement with the previously observed ν(C=O) stretching [25] and theoretically calculated values as reflected in Table 3. The imidazole ν(C=N) stretching of LA appears as individual signals while they are coupled under broad peaks with LB, LC, and LD molecules as seen about 1650 cm−1 while the frequencies for ν(C=N) stretching are in agreements with the corresponding data as given in [26]. The aliphatic ν(C-N) stretching in 1069–1235 cm−1 interval and the aliphatic ν(C-C) stretching in 917–1099 cm−1 are consistent with the previous corresponding measurements [27].Beyond the consistency of the common imidazole properties of the molecules, we also give unique infrared signals of molecules in Table3. C-O stretching belong to the H2C-OH group in LA, in-plane δ vibrations of CH3 at the end of the aliphatic chain of LB, and at the attachment of the imidazole ring of LC are such unique vibrations. The calculated and observed wave numbers of these vibrations are consistent with the concerning previous studies [28, 29].The molecules in consideration analyzed by infrared spectrum because of the lack of exchangeable protons of -OH and -NH2 in the NMR spectra of the chemicals and the existence of these groups is proved in the molecules. Also, the IR spectra of the molecules reverifies the theoretically obtained configurations of them as they were first verified by the comparison the theoretical NMR spectra with that of the experimental NMR spectra.


## 3.4. Antibacterial and Cytotoxic Activities

The antibacterial tests of the synthesized four molecules were run on the six different bacteria and yeast, as mentioned in Section2.3.1. Figures 2(a) and 3(b) show the inhibitory effects of the various concentrations of the LA and LB on Candida albicans ATCC 10231 and Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778 (Gram positive) together with that of the antibiotic controls. Their effects on Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Gram negative), Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115 are excluded because of their very weak efficacy in comparison with that of the antibiotic control. Although the absorbance measurements involve some statistical errors, LA showed better inhibition than the antibiotic on Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, while both chemicals are effective on the selected bacteria and yeast as much as the antibiotics. LC and LD show no noticeable inhibitory effects on the target bacteria, and thus, their absorbance values as function of their concentration were not given for the sake of brevity.Figure 2
(a) The antibacterial activity onCandida albicans. The first bars on the left are for the commercial antibiotic inhibition for each dose. The second bars are for 1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide (LA), and the third bars are for 3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1- (3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (LB), (b) same as in Figure 2(a), but for the antibacterial activity on Bacillus cereus.
(a)
(b)Figure 3
(a) The cytotoxicity of1,3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide. The first bars represent the effect on healthy mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line for each dose, as do the second bars on human cervical cancer cell line, and the third bars on human liver cancer cell line, (b) same as in Figure 3(a), but for the cytotoxicity of 3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide.
(a)
(b)Figure3(a) shows the cytotoxic activity of LC on HeLa and Hep G2 cell lines against healthy MEF cell lines, as does Figure 3(b) for the cytotoxic activity of LD. The cytotoxic activities of LA and LB are not exhibited as they showed lesser cytotoxic activities in comparison with LC and LD. The percentage cell viability of HeLa and Hep G2 cell lines was significantly reduced by LC and LD at the end of 24 hr application of the doses. In addition, LC did not harm the healthy MEF cell lines for any dose so that its half inhibitory concentrations (IC50) cannot be calculated. Meantime, LD showed some activity on the MEF cells with the high doses together with the fact that the activity was not as strong as it did on the cancer cell lines.The antibacterial and cytotoxic effectiveness of the synthesized molecules are summarized in Table7 by presenting their IC50 concentrations in the units of µM on the bacteria together with the IC50 values of the antibiotics and on the cancer cell lines. The lack of the IC50 values of LC and LD for antibacterial activity in Table 7 indicates that the IC50 values of them cannot be calculated due to their very weak effect on the bacteria sample within the dose range considered. LA and LB were, respectively, thrice and twice more effective on Bacillus cereus than the antibiotic (gentamicin) as the LA equals the antibiotic (amphotericin-b) effect on Candida albicans.Table 7
Half inhibition concentrations of the molecules on the selected bacteria and cancer cell lines.
Antibacterial activity IC50 (µM)
Cytotoxic activity IC50 (µM)
Escherichia coli O157:H7
Candida albicans
Bacillus cereus
HeLa
Hep G2
MEF
L
A
32
30
17
316
100
—
L
B
39
156
29
141
182
—
L
C
—
—
—
81
150
—
L
D
—
—
—
167
57
—
Antibiotic
10
30
56
—
—
—
L
A, 1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide; LB, 3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide; LC, 1,3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide; LD 3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide; IC50, half inhibitory concentrations; HeLa, human cervical cancer cell line; Hep G2, human liver cancer cell line; MEF, healthy mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line.The cell viability assay of the chemicals exhibits no harmful effect on the healthy MEF cell lines as their IC50 values cannot be calculated within the dose range considered. The LC inhibition on HeLa and the LD inhibition on Hep G2 are distinctive when they are compared with the inhibition of the other imidazole-based chemicals on different cancer cell lines in the concerning studies. The IC50 values of the LC on HeLa and the LD on Hep G2 were 81 µM and 57 µM, respectively. The similar imidazole compounds which have alkyl moieties were tested on the cancer cells different from the cells used in this study [8]. The IC50 values of 1-(benzofuran-2-yl(phenyl)methyl)-3-allyl-2-ethyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide and 1-(benzofuran-2-yl(phenyl)methyl)-3-butyl-2-ethyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium iodide on leukemia (HL-60), lung carcinoma (A549), colon carcinoma (SW480), breast carcinoma (MCF-7), and myeloid liver carcinoma (SMMC-7721) cancer lines have been detected over 40 µM. Additionally, the IC50 activity of 3β-hydroxy-21-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)pregna-5,16-dien-20-one on prostate cancer (PC-3), breast cancer (MCF7), and lung cancer (SK-LU- 1) were 20 µM, 19 µM, and 18 µM, respectively [7]. These results are quantitatively better than 81 µM and 57 µM on Hep G2 and HeLa. However, this is compensated by the fact that the LC and LD have not any harmful effect on the healthy MEF cell lines.


## 4. Conclusions

Novel imidazole salts, orN-heterocyclic carbene ligands, namely, 1,3-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) imidazolidinium bromide LA, 3-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethly)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide LB, 1,3-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-4-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide LC, and 3-(2-carboxyethyl)-1-(3-aminopropyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide LD were synthesized, and they were preliminary confirmed by GC-MS and elemental analysis methods. Their molecular structures were theoretically determined, and they were confirmed by comparing calculated 1H, 13C NMR, and IR spectra with those of experimentally observed data. Also, the calculated structures were verified by the XRD results on a similar imidazole salt [22].The antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of the synthesized ligands on some specific bacteria and cancer cell lines were measured using spectrophotometric methods. It is seen thatLA showed better inhibition than the selected antibiotic on Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778 while it is effective on the selected bacteria and the yeast together with LB. On the cytotoxicity evaluation, LC showed considerable inhibition effect on HeLa, as does LD on Hep G2. Although their IC50 doses are quite high in comparison with the similar chemicals in the literature, the cytotoxicity of LC and LD is affirmed by not causing harmful effect on the healthy MEF cells as much as they do on the cancel cell lines.



---

*Source: 1439810-2018-05-22.xml*