# Impact of Nonstandard Interactions on Neutrino-Nucleon Scattering

Authors: D. K. Papoulias; T. S. Kosmas
Journal: Advances in High Energy Physics
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Nonstandard neutrino-nucleon interaction is formulated and explored within the energy range of quasi-elastic scattering. In particular, the study focuses on the neutral-current elastic (anti)neutrino scattering off nucleons described by the exotic reactionsνα(ν¯α)+n→νβ(ν¯β)+n and να(ν¯α)+p→νβ(ν¯β)+p, which provide corrections to the dominant Standard Model processes. In this context, it is shown that the required exotic nucleon form factors may have a significant impact on the relevant cross sections. Besides cross sections, the event rate is expected to be rather sensitive to the magnitude of the lepton-flavour violating parameters resulting in an excess of events. The overlap of nonstandard interactions and strange quark contributions, in the region of few GeV neutrino energies, is also examined. The formalism is applied for the case of the relevant neutrino-nucleon scattering experiments (LSND, MiniBooNE, etc.) and motivates the notion that such facilities have high potential to probe NSI.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Neutrinos are among the most elusive particles in nature and in order to investigate their properties [1, 2] various terrestrial detectors have been built [3]. These ghostly particles fill the whole universe and reach Earth coming from the sun (solar neutrinos), from supernova explosions (supernova neutrinos), and from many other celestial objects (e.g., black hole binary stars, active galactic nuclei) [4]. The majority of them pass through Earth and through the nuclear detectors, designed for such purposes, without leaving any trace or signal [5]. This is mostly due to the fact that neutrinos interact very weakly with matter [6, 7]. For the investigation of neutrino-matter scattering, it is feasible to employ powerful accelerators operating at major laboratories such as Fermilab, J-Park, and CERN. These facilities can produce intensive neutrino beams of which a tiny fraction can be detected by novel detectors placed in the beam line (e.g., COHERENT experiment at Oak Ridge [8], TEXONO experiment in Taiwan [9], νGeN [10] and GEMMA [11] experiments in Russia, and CONNIE project in Brazil [12, 13]).On the theoretical side, phenomenological models within and beyond the standard electroweak theory come out with theoretical predictions for many aspects of neutrinos in trying to understand their properties and interactions [14] and propose appropriate neutrino probes for extracting new experimental results [15–17]. Current important areas of research concern the neutrino masses [18], neutrino oscillations [19, 20], neutrino electromagnetic properties [21–25], and so forth, their role in the evolution of astrophysical sources such as the sun or supernovae [26–28], their impact on cosmology (e.g., in answering the question of the matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe), and others.The neutral-current elastic (NCE) and charged-current quasi-elastic (CCQE) scattering of neutrinos with nucleons and nuclei constitute examples of fundamental electroweak interactions within the Standard Model (SM) [29], which, despite their relative simplicity, are presently not well understood. The first attempts of experimentally measuring the cross sections of the latter processes resulted in a discrepancy [30–32] with the predictions of the widely used relativistic Fermi gas (RFG) model [33–37]. There has been much effort towards quantifying this disagreement (between theory and experiment), mainly in terms of the nucleon electromagnetic form factors at intermediate energies [38, 39], while other works focus on the study of the potential contribution of the strange components of the hadronic current [40–43].Over a decade ago, an anomalous excess of events has been reported by the LSND experiment in searching forνμ→νe oscillations [44]. Recently, in the MiniBooNE neutrino-nucleon scattering experiment, an unexplained excess of electron-like events, ΔN=128.8±20.4±38.3, has been observed in the reconstructed neutrino energy range 200≤Eν≤475 MeV [45–49]. To interpret these data, some authors [50] argued that the RFG model is insufficient to accurately describe the neutrino-nucleon interaction in nuclei embedded in dense media [50], while other authors paid special attention to the final state interaction (FSI) effects [51–53]. Furthermore, this anomaly has triggered the intense theoretical interest and towards its explanation several models have been proposed [54, 55] including also those addressing heavy Dirac or Majorana neutrino decay [56, 57], the existence of sterile neutrinos [58], and others.Historically, nucleons and nuclear systems have been extensively employed [59, 60] as microlaboratories for exploring open neutrino properties through charged- [61] and neutral-current interaction processes [62]. The latter involve both the vector and the axial vector components of the weak interactions [63, 64]. Thus, such probes are helpful for investigating the fundamental interactions of neutrinos with other elementary particles at low, intermediate, and high energies [65]. For the case of neutral-current coherent elastic neutrino scattering off complex nuclei, a detailed analysis focusing on possible alterations of the expected event rates due to the existence of nonstandard interactions (NSI) was performed in our previous works [66–68].Motivated by the latter, in this paper, we explore the possibility of probing exotic neutrino processes in the relevant experiments. Thus, within the framework of NSI [69] (for a review, see [70, 71]), we consider the NCE scattering of the following neutrino-nucleon reactions:(1)ναν¯α+n⟶νβν¯β+n,(2)ναν¯α+p⟶νβν¯β+p,where α,β=e,μ,τ denote the neutrino flavour. Specifically, for the case of the MiniBooNE processes, we concentrate on the channels where α=μ and β=e (for NSI scattering involving tau neutrinos, see [72, 73]). In the present study, the magnitude of the proposed novel interactions is given in terms of the adopted NSI nucleon form factors as functions of the four-momentum transfer. In our effort to explore potential NSI neutrino-nucleon interactions, as a first step, we focus only on the NSI Feynman diagrams depicted in Figure 1 where, for completeness, the corresponding diagrams involving charged-current (CC) processes are also included.Figure 1
Diagrams of nonstandard neutrino-nucleon interactions for neutral-current (a) and charged-current (b) processes.
(a) (b)


## 2. Neutral-Current Nonstandard Neutrino-Nucleon Interactions

In the present work, the assumed NSI operators are effective four-fermion operators of the form [70](3)O=f¯1γμPf2f¯3γμPf4+h.c.,with fi, i=1,2,3,4 being the SM fermion fields and P={L,R} denoting left- and right-handed projectors. Specifically, for neutral currents, one has neutrino-induced NSI with matter of the form [69](4)OαβfP=ν¯αγμLνβf¯γμPf+h.c.,with f denoting a first-generation quark q=u,d.


### 2.1. Neutrino-Nucleon Cross Sections within and beyond the SM

The calculations of the neutrino-nucleon cross sections start by writing down the nucleon matrix elements of processes (1) and (2) in the usual V-A form, as(5)M=iGF22jμNJZμN=iGF22ν¯αγμ1-γ5νβNJZμN,where jμ denotes the leptonic neutral current, GF is the Fermi coupling constant, and N represents the nucleon wavefunction. In the latter expression, NJZμN is the hadronic matrix element that is (after neglecting the second-class currents and the contribution of pseudoscalar component) expressed in terms of the known nucleon form factors as [7](6)NJZμN=NF1NC:pnQ2+F2NC:pnQ2iσμνqν2mN+FANC:pnQ2γμγ5N.In (6), F1NC:p(n)(Q2), F2NC:p(n)(Q2), and FANC:p(n)(Q2) stand for the Dirac, Pauli, and axial vector weak neutral-current form factors, respectively, for protons (p) or neutrons (n) [1].Relying on the above nucleon matrix elements, within the relativistic Fermi gas (RFG) model, the SM differential cross section of reactions (1) and (2) for incoming (anti)neutrino energy Eν has been written as [29](7)dσdQ2=GF2Q22πEν2AQ2±BQ2W+CQ2W2.In the above expression, the plus (minus) sign accounts for neutrino (antineutrino) scattering while the momentum-dependent function, W(Q2), reads [41](8)W=4EνmN-Q2mN2,where the four-momentum transfer is defined in terms of the nucleon recoil energy TN, as(9)q2=qμqμ=-Q2=-2mNTN.For the nucleon mass, mN, we assume the value mp≈mn=mN=0.938 GeV.Before proceeding to the cross sections calculations, for the reader’s convenience, we provide below some significant details on the aforementioned expressionsA, B, and C that depend on the form factors FiNC:p(n), i=1,2,A. The functions A(Q2), B(Q2), and C(Q2) are defined as [42](10)AQ2=14FANC:pn21+τ-F1NC:pn2-τF2NC:pn21-τ+4τF1NC:pnF2NC:pn,BQ2=-14FANC:pnF1NC:pn+F2NC:pn,CQ2=mN216Q2lFANC:pn2+F1NC:pn2+τF2NC:pn2,where their explicit Q2 dependence has been suppressed and τ=Q2/4mN2.In principle, the electromagnetic Dirac and Pauli form factors are written in terms of the well-known electric (E) and magnetic (M) form factors as follows [1]:(11)F1EM:pn=GEpnQ2+τGMpnQ21+τ,F2EM:pn=GMpnQ2-τGEpnQ21+τ.In this work, the magnetic form factors are parametrised as [39](12)GMpnμpn=1+apn,1Mτ1+bpn,1Mτ+bpn,2Mτ2+bpn,3Mτ3,where μp(n) denotes the proton (neutron) magnetic moment. The proton electric form factor in a similar manner can be cast in the form [26](13)GEpn=1+apn,1Eτ1+bpn,1Eτ+bpn,2Eτ2+bpn,3Eτ3,(for the fit parameters, ap(n),1M(E) and bp(n),jM(E), j=1,2,3, see [39]). The electric neutron form factor, GEn, is expressed through the Galster-like parametrisation, as(14)GEnQ2=λ1τ1+λ2τGDQ2,with λ1=1.68 and λ2=3.63.


### 2.2. NSI Nucleon Form Factors

As it is well known, within the SM, the weak NC Dirac and Pauli form factors are written in terms of the electromagnetic current form factorsFiEM, i=1,2 (assuming the conserved vector current (CVC) theory) [1]. In the present work, we furthermore consider additional contributions originating from NSI that enter through the vector-type form factors εμeqV(Q2). In our parametrisation, the latter are written in terms of the fundamental NSI neutrino-quark couplings ϵμeuV (ϵμedV) for u (d) quarks discussed in [66–68], and they take the form(15)εμepVQ2=2ϵμeuV+ϵμedVGDQ2,εμenVQ2=ϵμeuV+2ϵμedVGDQ2.In the spirit of previous studies which consider the strangeness of the nucleon [41, 42], the above NSI form factors may have the same momentum dependence as those of the SM ones. Thus, the function GD(Q2) is assumed to be of dipole type:(16)GD=1+Q2MV2-2,(for the vector mass, a commonly used value is MV=0.843 GeV). A dipole approximation for GD(Q2), apart from providing the appropriate momentum dependence, ensures also that the event rate coming out of NSI has the correct behaviour at high energies [40].Then, the weak neutral-current nucleon form factors for protons (plus sign) and neutrons (minus sign) employed in our present calculations read(17)F1,2NC:pnQ2=τ32F1,2EM:pQ2-F1,2EM:nQ2-2sin2⁡θWF1,2EM:pnQ2-12F1,2s:pnQ2+τ3εμepnVQ2.In the latter expression, the isoscalar form factors F1,2s:p(n) account for potential contributions to the electric charge and the magnetic moment of the nucleon due to the presence of strange quarks (in our convention, the isospin index τ3 is +1 for proton and −1 for neutron scattering). However, throughout our calculations, on the basis of the recent results from the HAPPEX experiment [43], we take F1,2s:p(n)=0 (see also [52]). Note that, for low momentum transfer, the form factors discussed in [66, 67] are recovered. The effect of NSI on the form factors is illustrated graphically in Figure 2, where typical values have been adopted for the NSI parameters; that is, ϵμeuV=ϵμedV=0.05 (apparently strange quark contributions have no impact in this case). Within the present formalism, the new nucleon form factors are rather sensitive to NSI, even for small values of the fundamental model parameters, especially for low momentum transfer.Figure 2
Comparison of the SM and NSI nucleon form factors employed in the present study (for details, see the text).For the case of the axial form factorFANC:p(n), we correspondingly employed [61](18)FANC:pnQ2=12τ3gA+gAs1+Q2MA2-2.Here, we used the static axial vector coupling, gA=-1.267 (it is determined usually through neutron beta decay). For the strange quark contribution to the nucleon spin, we adopt the static value 2FAs(0)=gAs± 0.07 with gAs=-0.15, while for the axial mass we take MA=1.049 GeV (i.e., fit II of [41]). As has been recently discussed in [54], this set of values is fully compatible with the MiniBooNE data, even though a large value of MA=1.35 GeV was reported in [47]. Furthermore, for simplicity, potential axial NSI form factors are neglected.


## 2.1. Neutrino-Nucleon Cross Sections within and beyond the SM

The calculations of the neutrino-nucleon cross sections start by writing down the nucleon matrix elements of processes (1) and (2) in the usual V-A form, as(5)M=iGF22jμNJZμN=iGF22ν¯αγμ1-γ5νβNJZμN,where jμ denotes the leptonic neutral current, GF is the Fermi coupling constant, and N represents the nucleon wavefunction. In the latter expression, NJZμN is the hadronic matrix element that is (after neglecting the second-class currents and the contribution of pseudoscalar component) expressed in terms of the known nucleon form factors as [7](6)NJZμN=NF1NC:pnQ2+F2NC:pnQ2iσμνqν2mN+FANC:pnQ2γμγ5N.In (6), F1NC:p(n)(Q2), F2NC:p(n)(Q2), and FANC:p(n)(Q2) stand for the Dirac, Pauli, and axial vector weak neutral-current form factors, respectively, for protons (p) or neutrons (n) [1].Relying on the above nucleon matrix elements, within the relativistic Fermi gas (RFG) model, the SM differential cross section of reactions (1) and (2) for incoming (anti)neutrino energy Eν has been written as [29](7)dσdQ2=GF2Q22πEν2AQ2±BQ2W+CQ2W2.In the above expression, the plus (minus) sign accounts for neutrino (antineutrino) scattering while the momentum-dependent function, W(Q2), reads [41](8)W=4EνmN-Q2mN2,where the four-momentum transfer is defined in terms of the nucleon recoil energy TN, as(9)q2=qμqμ=-Q2=-2mNTN.For the nucleon mass, mN, we assume the value mp≈mn=mN=0.938 GeV.Before proceeding to the cross sections calculations, for the reader’s convenience, we provide below some significant details on the aforementioned expressionsA, B, and C that depend on the form factors FiNC:p(n), i=1,2,A. The functions A(Q2), B(Q2), and C(Q2) are defined as [42](10)AQ2=14FANC:pn21+τ-F1NC:pn2-τF2NC:pn21-τ+4τF1NC:pnF2NC:pn,BQ2=-14FANC:pnF1NC:pn+F2NC:pn,CQ2=mN216Q2lFANC:pn2+F1NC:pn2+τF2NC:pn2,where their explicit Q2 dependence has been suppressed and τ=Q2/4mN2.In principle, the electromagnetic Dirac and Pauli form factors are written in terms of the well-known electric (E) and magnetic (M) form factors as follows [1]:(11)F1EM:pn=GEpnQ2+τGMpnQ21+τ,F2EM:pn=GMpnQ2-τGEpnQ21+τ.In this work, the magnetic form factors are parametrised as [39](12)GMpnμpn=1+apn,1Mτ1+bpn,1Mτ+bpn,2Mτ2+bpn,3Mτ3,where μp(n) denotes the proton (neutron) magnetic moment. The proton electric form factor in a similar manner can be cast in the form [26](13)GEpn=1+apn,1Eτ1+bpn,1Eτ+bpn,2Eτ2+bpn,3Eτ3,(for the fit parameters, ap(n),1M(E) and bp(n),jM(E), j=1,2,3, see [39]). The electric neutron form factor, GEn, is expressed through the Galster-like parametrisation, as(14)GEnQ2=λ1τ1+λ2τGDQ2,with λ1=1.68 and λ2=3.63.


## 2.2. NSI Nucleon Form Factors

As it is well known, within the SM, the weak NC Dirac and Pauli form factors are written in terms of the electromagnetic current form factorsFiEM, i=1,2 (assuming the conserved vector current (CVC) theory) [1]. In the present work, we furthermore consider additional contributions originating from NSI that enter through the vector-type form factors εμeqV(Q2). In our parametrisation, the latter are written in terms of the fundamental NSI neutrino-quark couplings ϵμeuV (ϵμedV) for u (d) quarks discussed in [66–68], and they take the form(15)εμepVQ2=2ϵμeuV+ϵμedVGDQ2,εμenVQ2=ϵμeuV+2ϵμedVGDQ2.In the spirit of previous studies which consider the strangeness of the nucleon [41, 42], the above NSI form factors may have the same momentum dependence as those of the SM ones. Thus, the function GD(Q2) is assumed to be of dipole type:(16)GD=1+Q2MV2-2,(for the vector mass, a commonly used value is MV=0.843 GeV). A dipole approximation for GD(Q2), apart from providing the appropriate momentum dependence, ensures also that the event rate coming out of NSI has the correct behaviour at high energies [40].Then, the weak neutral-current nucleon form factors for protons (plus sign) and neutrons (minus sign) employed in our present calculations read(17)F1,2NC:pnQ2=τ32F1,2EM:pQ2-F1,2EM:nQ2-2sin2⁡θWF1,2EM:pnQ2-12F1,2s:pnQ2+τ3εμepnVQ2.In the latter expression, the isoscalar form factors F1,2s:p(n) account for potential contributions to the electric charge and the magnetic moment of the nucleon due to the presence of strange quarks (in our convention, the isospin index τ3 is +1 for proton and −1 for neutron scattering). However, throughout our calculations, on the basis of the recent results from the HAPPEX experiment [43], we take F1,2s:p(n)=0 (see also [52]). Note that, for low momentum transfer, the form factors discussed in [66, 67] are recovered. The effect of NSI on the form factors is illustrated graphically in Figure 2, where typical values have been adopted for the NSI parameters; that is, ϵμeuV=ϵμedV=0.05 (apparently strange quark contributions have no impact in this case). Within the present formalism, the new nucleon form factors are rather sensitive to NSI, even for small values of the fundamental model parameters, especially for low momentum transfer.Figure 2
Comparison of the SM and NSI nucleon form factors employed in the present study (for details, see the text).For the case of the axial form factorFANC:p(n), we correspondingly employed [61](18)FANC:pnQ2=12τ3gA+gAs1+Q2MA2-2.Here, we used the static axial vector coupling, gA=-1.267 (it is determined usually through neutron beta decay). For the strange quark contribution to the nucleon spin, we adopt the static value 2FAs(0)=gAs± 0.07 with gAs=-0.15, while for the axial mass we take MA=1.049 GeV (i.e., fit II of [41]). As has been recently discussed in [54], this set of values is fully compatible with the MiniBooNE data, even though a large value of MA=1.35 GeV was reported in [47]. Furthermore, for simplicity, potential axial NSI form factors are neglected.


## 3. Results and Discussion

At first, we calculate the differential cross sections of (7) for the SM (α=β) weak NC elastic scattering processes (1) and (2) as well as for the NSI ones (α≠β), based on (15)–(18) (neglecting potential strange quark contributions, i.e., F1,2s:p(n)=0 and gAs=0). The corresponding results are demonstrated in Figure 3 for νp→νp scattering (a) and νn→νn scattering (b). For the sake of comparison, the bands of axial vector strange quark contributions calculated within gAs±0.07 and those of NSI contributions within the range ϵμeqV=(-0.05,0.05) with q={u,d} are also depicted. One sees that the resulting strange quark contributions indicate almost equal cross sections for proton and neutron scattering, while the presence of NSI leads to an enhancement of the cross sections for both νp→νp and νn→νn scattering channels, which becomes more important at lower energies.Figure 3
Differential cross section with respect to the momentum transfer for SM, strange quark, and NSI, forνp→νp(a) and νn→νn scattering (b). For details, see the text.
(a) (b)From the perspective of experimental physics, it is crucial to reduce most of the background as well as beam related and systematic uncertainties. Therefore, a rather advantageous way towards determining the strange or NSI parameters is to perform measurements of the ratio of the NCE cross sections:(19)R=dσp/dQ2dσn/dQ2.In this context, Figure 4 illustrates a comparison of the obtained bands for the ratio R assuming neutrino-nucleon scattering in the presence of strange quarks or potential NSI. One notices that R varies between 0.75 and 1.20 when axial vector strange quark contributions are taken into account, while for the case of NSI the ratio is significantly lower; that is, it lies between 0.55 and 0.8. It is furthermore shown that, unlike the strange quark case, the SM result for R lies within the predicted NSI band.Figure 4
Momentum variation of the cross sections ratio for SM, strange quark, and NSI neutrino-nucleon scattering.Focusing on the relevant experiments, in order to perform reliable calculations, important effects that originate from the Pauli principle must be taken into account (Fermi motion of the initial nucleons). Specifically, for the case of nucleons bound in nuclear matter, within the Fermi gas model, it is adequate to multiply the free cross section given in (7) with a suppression factor S(Q2). The latter accounts for the Pauli blocking effect on the final nucleons in a local density approximation [62] and is given by the expression [29](20)SQ2=1-DQ2N,where N is the number of neutrons of the nuclear target. Assuming a carbon target, C12, D(Q2) takes the form(21)DQ2=A21-34qpF+124qpF3,q<2pF,0,q>2pF,with the Fermi momentum pF=0.220 GeV (for its definition, see [61, 65]) and q being the magnitude of the three-momentum transfer. Within this framework, the total cross section may be evaluated through numerical integration of the differential cross section (7) as(22)σEν=∫0Qmax2EνSQ2dσdQ2dQ2.For NCE scattering, the kinematics of the process provide the approximate upper limit of the momentum transfer Q2, as(23)Qmax2Eν=4mNEν2mN+2Eν.The obtained results are demonstrated in Figure 5 for protons and in Figure 6 for neutrons for the case of (i) free nucleon scattering, that is, on a hydrogen atom (a), and (ii) medium scattering, that is, for bound nucleons within a carbon atom (b). As expected, for both SM and NSI, the obtained integrated cross section for the νn process is much larger than that of the νp reaction. Apparently, one also notices that the NCE cross sections, for both νp→νp and νn→νn scattering channels, are enhanced when potential nonzero NSI are assumed. For the case of neutrino-proton scattering, the considered axial vector strange quark effects dominate the total cross section. On the other hand, focusing on neutrino-neutron scattering, the assumed strangeness of the nucleon leads to suppression of the total cross section. Eventually, we find that the resulting strange quark and NSI bands overlap only for νn processes.Figure 5
Total integratedνp→νp scattering cross section as a function of the incoming neutrino energy due to SM, strange quark, and NSI scattering. The results refer to scattering on free protons (a) and scattering on bound protons, that is, assuming nuclear effects, at a 12C detector (b).
(a) (b)Figure 6
Same as Figure5 but for νn→νn scattering.
(a) (b)At this point, we find it interesting to focus our discussion on the MiniBooNE experiment and apply the addressed NSI model. Thus, by convoluting the energy distribution of the MiniBooNE neutrino beam with the NSI cross section of (7), we evaluate the flux-integrated differential NSI neutrino-nucleon cross sections dσp,n/dTp,n, through the expression(24)dσp,ndTp,n=∫SQ2dσdQ2Eν,Q2ΦνEνδQ22mN-Tp,ndEνdQ2,where the utilised muon neutrino flux, Φν(Eν), is normalised to unity. The results are illustrated in Figure 7, where it is clearly shown that the nuclear effects become important at low recoil energies. More specifically, for NCE scattering on free nucleons (e.g., for a hydrogen target), the cross section is significantly larger and constantly increasing for low nucleon recoil energies. On the contrary, for the case of bound nucleons within the carbon target material, C12, the behaviour of the cross section changes drastically at low recoil energies and its value minimises for energies ≲100 MeV. As for the total integrated cross sections discussed previously, our results show an overlap between the obtained strange quark and NSI bands only for the processes involving νn→νn scattering.Figure 7
Differential cross section as a function of the nucleon (proton or neutron) recoil energy due to SM, strange quark, and NSI. Modifications due to the employed nuclear effects are illustrated and compared with the case of scattering on free nucleons.We finally test the compatibility of the employed NSI scenario with recent results from the LSND and MiniBooNE experiments. To this aim, concentrating on neutrino-nucleon scattering on a mineral oil (CH2), the folded differential cross section reads [47](25)dσNdTN=17dσpHdTp+37dσpCdTp+37dσnCdTn.Then, we evaluate the number of conventional and NSI events as a function of the nucleon recoil energy, TN, by assuming a CH2 detector (i.e., the detector material of the LSND and MiniBooNE experiments) through the expression(26)Nevents=aTN∫NNNPOTdσNdTNdTN.In order to confront our present results with the recent MiniBooNE data, we assumed the following experimental quantities: the utilised muon neutrino flux, Φν(Eν), is normalised to the protons on target (POT) with NPOT denoting the number of POT in the data [46] and a(TN) denoting the detector efficiency taken from [49]. The number of nucleon targets in the detector is evaluated as NN=NA4/3πR3ρoil, where the density of mineral oil is ρoil=0.845gr/cm3 at 20°C [48] and NA is Avogadro’s number. The fiducial volume cut of the detector is adopted from [47]. Figure 8 illustrates the number of events as a function of the nucleon kinetic energy, TN, obtained within the context of the SM, as well as by assuming potential contributions to the rate arising from strange quarks or NSI (for a comparison with the MiniBooNE experimental results, see [47]). The obtained excess of events becomes significant for low recoil energies, reflecting the dipole character of the form factor GD(Q2) that enters the definition of the NSI nucleon form factors given in (15).Figure 8
Expected number of events as a function of the nucleon recoil energyTN assuming contributions due to the SM, strange quark, and NSI.Motivated by our previous studies, we consider it interesting to estimate the sensitivity of MiniBooNE to nonstandard interactions, through aχ2 fit analysis. By varying one NSI coupling at a time and by neglecting potential strange quark contributions, the minimisation of the χ2ϵμuV function provides constraints on the NSI parameters of the order of ϵμedV≈ϵμedV=0.05. Furthermore, in order to explore the overlap of strange quark and NSI contributions that enter the NCE scattering cross section of (7), a two-parameter combined analysis is performed. By simultaneously varying the strange quark gAs and NSI ϵμeuV (setting ϵμedV=0) parameters, the minimisation of χ2ϵμeuV,Δs yields the contours in the parameter space ϵμeuV-Δs shown in Figure 9, at 68%, 90%, and 99% CL. These results indicate strongly that current neutrino-nucleon experiments are favourable facilities to provide new insights and to put severe bounds on nonstandard interaction parameters.Figure 9
Allowed region in theϵμeuV-Δs plane at MiniBooNE. The best fit point is shown by ⋆.


## 4. Summary and Conclusions

In the present work, focusing on the NCE neutrino-nucleon scattering, potential corrections to the SM cross sections that arise from strange quark contributions and nonstandard neutrino-nucleon interactions are comprehensively investigated. In this context, the possibility of probing the relevant model parameters is explored. Furthermore, special effort has been devoted towards exploring the overlap of possible contributions due to strange quarks and NSI. The study involves reliable calculations of the differential and total neutrino-nucleon cross sections by taking into account important nuclear effects such as the Pauli blocking. Within this framework, the NSI contributions originate from the respective nucleon form factors and adopt dipole momentum dependence, while the corresponding cross sections are rather sensitive to the magnitude of the NSI. The latter have a significant impact on the expected number of NCE neutrino-nucleon events and lead to an enhancement of the rate, which may be detectable by the relevant experiments (e.g., MiniBooNE), even for small values of the flavour changing parameters. It is furthermore shown that possible measurements of the ratio of the NSI cross sections for theνp process over the νp one offer a unique research path to probe NSI.We stress, however, that the above results refer to forward NSI scattering and thus they do not reproduce accurately the reported MiniBooNE anomaly where an isotropic excess of events was found coming either from electrons or from converted photons. In addition, the NSI contribution would be small if the “standard” value of possible NSI contributions is chosen. Moreover, in this case, the recoiling protons within the mineral oil are likely to have velocity below the Cherenkov threshold and therefore cannot reproduce the Cherenkov ring. On the other hand, the presence of potential nonstandard neutrino-nucleon events may be compatible with the LSND anomaly which did not rely on Cherenkov radiation.



---

*Source: 1490860-2016-12-21.xml*