# Electrospun Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Based Nanocomposite Fibers Containing(Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4

Authors: W. S. Khan; R. Asmatulu; Y. H. Lin; Y. Y. Chen; J. C. Ho
Journal: Journal of Nanotechnology
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Polyvinylpyrrolidone-based nanocomposite fibers containing (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 have been successfully fabricated by an electrospinning technique.  Magnetic measurements were made, individually, on polyvinylpyrrolidone, the ferrite nanoparticles, and several fibrous nanocomposites. The polymer exhibits a diamagnetic susceptibility comparable to the estimated value from Pascal’s constants. The nanocomposites maintain intrinsic properties of pure (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4, with a weighted magnitude according to its concentration in a given fiber.  Meanwhile, superparamagnetism prevails with a relatively low blocking temperature, assuring no aggregation of the fine particles. Such electrospun materials are flexible and have large surface area per unit mass, thus suitable for certain applications in environmental and biomedical engineering.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Soft magnetic ferrites have been widely used in electronics because of their low cost and excellent performance. Recent research has been focused on fabricating nanoparticles and expanding their applications. For example, the lack of domain wall resonance makes single-domain ferrite nanoparticles suitable for high frequency compact-core devices [1], and polymeric microspheres containing ferrite nanoparticles for drug delivery [2] have been actively pursued with promising results.This work was designed to fabricate electrospun fibers of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) doped with mixed ferrite (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 nanoparticles  and evaluate the product through magnetic characterization. Nanocomposite fibers have large surface area per unit mass and are highly flexible. Apart from magnetic storage and high-frequency antenna, their potential applications include environmental monitoring and filtration of small airborne contaminates [3] and, in the biomedical field, wound dressing, tissue engineering, as well as drug [4] and gene therapy [5].Flexible one-dimensional microstructures can be produced by electrodepositing magnetic additives to porous membranes [6]. However, the method is not practical for oxides. Instead, Gupta et al. [7] have demonstrated successfully an electrospinning technique in producing submicron Estane fibers containing MnZnFe-Ni nanoparticles. Electrospinning is essentially a drawing process utilizing electrostatic force instead of mechanical and shearing forces in conventional fiber formation.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

#### 2.1.1. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)

PVP is a water-soluble polymer (C6H9NO)n made from the monomer N-vinylpyrrolidone (Figure 1). The Sigma Aldrich product used in this work has approximately 130,000 g/mol.Figure 1
Polymerization ofN-vinylpyrrolidone.


#### 2.1.2.  (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 Nanoparticles (MNP)

Nano-scale (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 (herewith referred to as MNP) was used in this study. The composition was selected, because the 0.6/0.4 ratio for Ni/Zn corresponds to maximum saturation magnetization in the Ni-Zn mixed ferrite system [8, 9].The materials were prepared by a coprecipitation process. Ni-, Zn-, and Fe-sulfates (NiSO4, ZnSO4, and Fe2(SO4)3) from Sigma Aldrich were dissolved in deionized water, and heated up to 80°C with constant stirring at 700 rpm for 2-3 h. Following the drop-wise addition of NaOH, ferrite particles were produced and collected. Repeated washing removed all sulfate residues. Atomic force micrograph (Asylum Research, MFP-3D) in Figure 2 yields particle size of approximately 30 nm.Atomic force micrograph reveals particles (a)  of approximately 30 nm in size from scanning trace (b).
(a)(b)


### 2.2. Nanocomposite Fibers by Electrospinning

Three samples were prepared, each having a nominal compositionx=2, 4, or 8, which refers to the weight percentage of MNP in the nanocomposite fibers.The diagram in Figure3 illustrates the setup for electrospinning process, which creates fine fibers through an electrically charged jet of PVP in ethanol containing ferrite nanoparticles. The polymeric solution is first transferred to a 10 mL syringe, which is connected to a capillary needle with an inside diameter of 0.5 mm. By immersing a platinum electrode in the solution, a DC power supply produces 10–30 kV against a grounded collector screen. With the syringe pump set at 2.5 mL/hr, the electric force overcomes the surface tension of the solution at the capillary tip, and a jet emerges. After travelling 1-2 cm, it follows a spiral pattern due to bending instability [10]. This looping motion makes the jet to stretch significantly before arriving at the collector screen placed at 25 cm away, during which part of the solvent evaporated. Residual solvent was removed afterward by drying the resulting fibers in an oven at 60°C for 8 h. Figure 4 shows the scanning electron microscopic image of typical electrospun nanocomposite fibers.Figure 3
Diagram of electrospinning process.Figure 4
Electrospun fibers of PVP containing magnetic nanoparticles.


### 2.3. Magnetic Evaluations

The study addresses two basic questions: first, is the magnetic behavior of the composite fiber dominated by the nanoparticle inclusions? Secondly, do the nanoparticles maintain their magnetic properties in the fiber fabrication? Answer to the first question hinges on the relative magnetization between the polymer matrix and the relatively small amount, by weight, of (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4. To the second question, one needs to compare the magnetic behavior of the nanocomposite fibers to the expected values weighed by the intrinsic properties of parent (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4. Towards these ends, experimental data presented below are sequentially for PVP, (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 nanoparticles, and composite fibers containing MNP with  x=2, 4 and 8.Magnetization measurements were made with a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). Each sample was characterized in terms of its magnetization at 300 K, but changing fields between +20,000 and −20,000 Oe.For composite fibers withx=8, another set of data was taken, in terms of temperature dependence of magnetization between 4 and 300 K. The measuring field of 100 G was applied after cooling to 4 K (i.e., zero-field-cooling or ZFC) or prior to cooling (i.e., field-cooling or FC). Comparison between the two sets of magnetization data could reveal the superparamagnetic nature of magnetic nanoparticles.


## 2.1. Materials

### 2.1.1. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)

PVP is a water-soluble polymer (C6H9NO)n made from the monomer N-vinylpyrrolidone (Figure 1). The Sigma Aldrich product used in this work has approximately 130,000 g/mol.Figure 1
Polymerization ofN-vinylpyrrolidone.


### 2.1.2.  (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 Nanoparticles (MNP)

Nano-scale (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 (herewith referred to as MNP) was used in this study. The composition was selected, because the 0.6/0.4 ratio for Ni/Zn corresponds to maximum saturation magnetization in the Ni-Zn mixed ferrite system [8, 9].The materials were prepared by a coprecipitation process. Ni-, Zn-, and Fe-sulfates (NiSO4, ZnSO4, and Fe2(SO4)3) from Sigma Aldrich were dissolved in deionized water, and heated up to 80°C with constant stirring at 700 rpm for 2-3 h. Following the drop-wise addition of NaOH, ferrite particles were produced and collected. Repeated washing removed all sulfate residues. Atomic force micrograph (Asylum Research, MFP-3D) in Figure 2 yields particle size of approximately 30 nm.Atomic force micrograph reveals particles (a)  of approximately 30 nm in size from scanning trace (b).
(a)(b)


## 2.1.1. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)

PVP is a water-soluble polymer (C6H9NO)n made from the monomer N-vinylpyrrolidone (Figure 1). The Sigma Aldrich product used in this work has approximately 130,000 g/mol.Figure 1
Polymerization ofN-vinylpyrrolidone.


## 2.1.2.  (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 Nanoparticles (MNP)

Nano-scale (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 (herewith referred to as MNP) was used in this study. The composition was selected, because the 0.6/0.4 ratio for Ni/Zn corresponds to maximum saturation magnetization in the Ni-Zn mixed ferrite system [8, 9].The materials were prepared by a coprecipitation process. Ni-, Zn-, and Fe-sulfates (NiSO4, ZnSO4, and Fe2(SO4)3) from Sigma Aldrich were dissolved in deionized water, and heated up to 80°C with constant stirring at 700 rpm for 2-3 h. Following the drop-wise addition of NaOH, ferrite particles were produced and collected. Repeated washing removed all sulfate residues. Atomic force micrograph (Asylum Research, MFP-3D) in Figure 2 yields particle size of approximately 30 nm.Atomic force micrograph reveals particles (a)  of approximately 30 nm in size from scanning trace (b).
(a)(b)


## 2.2. Nanocomposite Fibers by Electrospinning

Three samples were prepared, each having a nominal compositionx=2, 4, or 8, which refers to the weight percentage of MNP in the nanocomposite fibers.The diagram in Figure3 illustrates the setup for electrospinning process, which creates fine fibers through an electrically charged jet of PVP in ethanol containing ferrite nanoparticles. The polymeric solution is first transferred to a 10 mL syringe, which is connected to a capillary needle with an inside diameter of 0.5 mm. By immersing a platinum electrode in the solution, a DC power supply produces 10–30 kV against a grounded collector screen. With the syringe pump set at 2.5 mL/hr, the electric force overcomes the surface tension of the solution at the capillary tip, and a jet emerges. After travelling 1-2 cm, it follows a spiral pattern due to bending instability [10]. This looping motion makes the jet to stretch significantly before arriving at the collector screen placed at 25 cm away, during which part of the solvent evaporated. Residual solvent was removed afterward by drying the resulting fibers in an oven at 60°C for 8 h. Figure 4 shows the scanning electron microscopic image of typical electrospun nanocomposite fibers.Figure 3
Diagram of electrospinning process.Figure 4
Electrospun fibers of PVP containing magnetic nanoparticles.


## 2.3. Magnetic Evaluations

The study addresses two basic questions: first, is the magnetic behavior of the composite fiber dominated by the nanoparticle inclusions? Secondly, do the nanoparticles maintain their magnetic properties in the fiber fabrication? Answer to the first question hinges on the relative magnetization between the polymer matrix and the relatively small amount, by weight, of (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4. To the second question, one needs to compare the magnetic behavior of the nanocomposite fibers to the expected values weighed by the intrinsic properties of parent (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4. Towards these ends, experimental data presented below are sequentially for PVP, (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 nanoparticles, and composite fibers containing MNP with  x=2, 4 and 8.Magnetization measurements were made with a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). Each sample was characterized in terms of its magnetization at 300 K, but changing fields between +20,000 and −20,000 Oe.For composite fibers withx=8, another set of data was taken, in terms of temperature dependence of magnetization between 4 and 300 K. The measuring field of 100 G was applied after cooling to 4 K (i.e., zero-field-cooling or ZFC) or prior to cooling (i.e., field-cooling or FC). Comparison between the two sets of magnetization data could reveal the superparamagnetic nature of magnetic nanoparticles.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)

As the matrix and the major ingredient, in weight, of the composite, PVP’s intrinsic magnetic behavior needs to be known. For polymers, the expected diamagnetism should yield a negative diamagnetizationMd linear with the external field. Accordingly, experimentally obtained magnetization  M  data in Figure 5 are fitted to two components. Apart from the diamagnetic  Md=-0.742×10-6H, another component Mm=M-Md shows saturation below 1,000 Oe. It likely arises from minor magnetic impurities in the industrial product. Nevertheless, it is negligible in data analysis below for MNP-containing samples, due to their orders-of-magnitude difference in M.Figure 5
MagnetizationM of  PVP can be resolved into two components. The expected diamagnetic Md is linearly proportional to H with a negative slope. The difference (M-Md), reaching saturation below 1,000 Oe, likely arises from minor magnetic impurities.It has been suggested that diamagnetic susceptibility (χd=Md/H) of a particular compound can be calculated by adding its individual atomic susceptibility or Pascal’s constant, supplemented by constitutive corrections [11]. For the base unit of PVP (C6H9NO, 111 g/g-atom) having 6 C, 9 H, 1 O, and 1 N (in ring), including 4 C in ring and one double bond, the estimated diamagnetic susceptibility would be(1)χd=[6(-6.00)+9(-2.93)+(-4.61)+(-4.61)]+[4(-0.24)+(+5.5)]=[-71.6]+[+4.5]=-67.1(10-6/g-atom),or −0.605 × 10−6/g. This is fairly close to the experimentally obtained value of  −0.742 × 10−6/g, considering the simple assumptions in the Pascal’s constants approach.


### 3.2. (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 Nanoparticles

Figure6 exhibits the typical field dependence of magnetization for soft magnetic ferrites at 300 K. Saturation occurs near 2,500 Oe. The slow and nearly linear increase of magnetization at higher fields is often observed in fine particles, presumably due to surface moments.Figure 6
Magnetization of (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 nanoparticles at 300 K, reaching saturation near 2,000 Oe.While the saturation magnetization is almost twice as large for bulk materials [8, 9], the result here is in agreement with that reported earlier for nanoparticles [1]. The difference could be due to variation in cations distribution in the spinel structure, as well as the surface effect.


### 3.3. PVP-Base Fibers Containing Magnetic Nanoparticles

Figure7 shows the field dependence of magnetization at 300 K for electrospun PVP-based nanocomposite fibers containing different amount of (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4. The general features are similar to that for pure (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 nanoparticles in Figure 6. Saturation prevails near 2,500 Oe in all curves. The 20,000-Oe data are in reasonable agreement with the weighted values for x=2, 4 or 8. Small discrepancies are somewhat expected, considering that each sample for SQUID measurement had mass of only approximately 50 mg. Such a small sampling could easily reflect the lack of perfect uniformity of the particles distribution in the fiber. Nevertheless, it can be stated that the particles in the electrospun fiber well maintain their original magnetic characteristics.Figure 7
Field dependence of magnetization for PVP-based nanocomposite fibers.The sample withx=8 was used for a superparamagnetic evaluation. Basically, ferrites become ferrimagnetically ordered below a Curie temperature, which is much higher then 300 K. However, each nanoparticle has a single domain, unless aggregation occurs, and its tendency to align with the applied field has exponential slow rates at low temperatures due to anisotropic barriers. In the case of ZFC, the initially random particles alignment yields a low magnetization at 4 K as observed. After a measuring field is applied, the magnetization rises with increasing temperature and approaches equilibrium value as revealed by the FC.Indeed, a superparamagnetic behavior forx=8 prevails in Figure 8. At 100 Oe, the ZFC and FC curves merge at a blocking temperature TB near 250 K. The observation provides confirmation of a well-dispersed distribution of MNP in the fiber.Figure 8
Temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility at 100 Oe for zero-field-cooled and field-cooled PVP + 8% MNP, showing a blocking temperature near 250 K.


## 3.1. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)

As the matrix and the major ingredient, in weight, of the composite, PVP’s intrinsic magnetic behavior needs to be known. For polymers, the expected diamagnetism should yield a negative diamagnetizationMd linear with the external field. Accordingly, experimentally obtained magnetization  M  data in Figure 5 are fitted to two components. Apart from the diamagnetic  Md=-0.742×10-6H, another component Mm=M-Md shows saturation below 1,000 Oe. It likely arises from minor magnetic impurities in the industrial product. Nevertheless, it is negligible in data analysis below for MNP-containing samples, due to their orders-of-magnitude difference in M.Figure 5
MagnetizationM of  PVP can be resolved into two components. The expected diamagnetic Md is linearly proportional to H with a negative slope. The difference (M-Md), reaching saturation below 1,000 Oe, likely arises from minor magnetic impurities.It has been suggested that diamagnetic susceptibility (χd=Md/H) of a particular compound can be calculated by adding its individual atomic susceptibility or Pascal’s constant, supplemented by constitutive corrections [11]. For the base unit of PVP (C6H9NO, 111 g/g-atom) having 6 C, 9 H, 1 O, and 1 N (in ring), including 4 C in ring and one double bond, the estimated diamagnetic susceptibility would be(1)χd=[6(-6.00)+9(-2.93)+(-4.61)+(-4.61)]+[4(-0.24)+(+5.5)]=[-71.6]+[+4.5]=-67.1(10-6/g-atom),or −0.605 × 10−6/g. This is fairly close to the experimentally obtained value of  −0.742 × 10−6/g, considering the simple assumptions in the Pascal’s constants approach.


## 3.2. (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 Nanoparticles

Figure6 exhibits the typical field dependence of magnetization for soft magnetic ferrites at 300 K. Saturation occurs near 2,500 Oe. The slow and nearly linear increase of magnetization at higher fields is often observed in fine particles, presumably due to surface moments.Figure 6
Magnetization of (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 nanoparticles at 300 K, reaching saturation near 2,000 Oe.While the saturation magnetization is almost twice as large for bulk materials [8, 9], the result here is in agreement with that reported earlier for nanoparticles [1]. The difference could be due to variation in cations distribution in the spinel structure, as well as the surface effect.


## 3.3. PVP-Base Fibers Containing Magnetic Nanoparticles

Figure7 shows the field dependence of magnetization at 300 K for electrospun PVP-based nanocomposite fibers containing different amount of (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4. The general features are similar to that for pure (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 nanoparticles in Figure 6. Saturation prevails near 2,500 Oe in all curves. The 20,000-Oe data are in reasonable agreement with the weighted values for x=2, 4 or 8. Small discrepancies are somewhat expected, considering that each sample for SQUID measurement had mass of only approximately 50 mg. Such a small sampling could easily reflect the lack of perfect uniformity of the particles distribution in the fiber. Nevertheless, it can be stated that the particles in the electrospun fiber well maintain their original magnetic characteristics.Figure 7
Field dependence of magnetization for PVP-based nanocomposite fibers.The sample withx=8 was used for a superparamagnetic evaluation. Basically, ferrites become ferrimagnetically ordered below a Curie temperature, which is much higher then 300 K. However, each nanoparticle has a single domain, unless aggregation occurs, and its tendency to align with the applied field has exponential slow rates at low temperatures due to anisotropic barriers. In the case of ZFC, the initially random particles alignment yields a low magnetization at 4 K as observed. After a measuring field is applied, the magnetization rises with increasing temperature and approaches equilibrium value as revealed by the FC.Indeed, a superparamagnetic behavior forx=8 prevails in Figure 8. At 100 Oe, the ZFC and FC curves merge at a blocking temperature TB near 250 K. The observation provides confirmation of a well-dispersed distribution of MNP in the fiber.Figure 8
Temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility at 100 Oe for zero-field-cooled and field-cooled PVP + 8% MNP, showing a blocking temperature near 250 K.


## 4. Conclusions

Polyvinylpyrrolidone-based fibers containing (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4 nanoparticles have been successfully fabricated by an electrospinning technique. Magnetic measurements on polyvinylpyrrolidone reveal an expected diamagnetic behavior and a small magnetic contribution presumably from minor impurities. Both terms are negligibly small. The nanocomposites maintain intrinsic properties of (Ni0.6Zn0.4)Fe2O4, with a weighted magnitude according to its concentration in a given fiber. Meanwhile, superparamagnetism prevails with a relatively low blocking temperature, assuring no aggregation of the fine particles. Such electrospun materials are flexible and have large surface area per unit mass, thus suitable for certain applications in environmental and biomedical engineering.



---

*Source: 138438-2012-05-31.xml*