# Probucol Protects Rats from Cardiac Dysfunction Induced by Oxidative Stress following Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Authors: Xu Xiao; Huiyuan Hou; Victor Lin; Daisy Ho; Kyle Tran; Briana Che; Adam May; Jiancheng Zhang; Zhigang Lu; Zhongping Lu; Peter X. Shaw
Journal: Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Objective. To investigate the protective effect of probucol on induced cardiac arrest (CA) rats and possible mechanisms. Methods. Sprague Dawley rats were orally administrated with probucol at different dosage or vehicle for 5 days and subjected to a CA model by electrical stimulation, followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate, antioxidant enzyme activities, and lipid oxidation markers were measured in serum and myocardium. Hemodynamic parameters and myocardial functions of animals were analyzed. Expression of erythroid-derived 2-like 2 (NFE2L2) and Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) in the myocardium were examined with immunohistochemistry. Results. Probucol treatment significantly increased the ROSC rate and survival time of CA-induced rats. After ROSC, levels of oxidation-specific markers were decreased, while activities of antioxidant enzymes were increased significantly in probucol treatment groups. The probucol treatment improves hemodynamic parameters and myocardial functions. These parameter changes were in a dose-dependent manner. In the probucol treatment groups, the expression of KEAP1 was downregulated, while that of NFE2L2 was upregulated significantly. Conclusion. In the CA-induced rat model, probucol dose dependently improved the ROSC rate, prolonged survival time, alleviated oxidative stress, and improved cardiac function. Such protective effects are possibly through regulations of the KEAP1-NFE2L2 system.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Cardiac arrest (CA) is one of the most critical cardiovascular phenomena. It is also the major cause of sudden cardiac death [1, 2]. During CA, the heart fails to pump blood around the body, and this results in ischemic damage. If the blood supply is not restored quickly, irreversible alterations to the endocrine system and the neural and/or humoral mechanisms will take place [3]; this leads to organ dysfunction and even failure of vital organs such as the heart, kidney, and brain. The severity of organ damage is related to the duration of ischemia and hypoxia and the time to restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) [4]. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is the most effective first-aid measure for CA. However, significant improvements in resuscitation success rates, as well as in the long-term survival and quality of life of patients, have not been observed. In addition, following successful CPR, ROSC occurs, and large amounts of oxygen reactive species (ROS) are generated by mitochondria in ischemic neuronal tissues resulting in oxidative stress and extensive reperfusion injury [5]. Therefore, adequate post-ROSC reperfusion of vital organs is crucial to improving resuscitation success rates and injury reduction [6]. To date, treatments that can positively improve organ function and patient prognosis remain unavailable [7] Over recent years, many studies have focused on using drugs to alleviate oxidative stress and ischemic reperfusion injury. In particular, drugs used against oxidative stress play an important role in improving the success rate of CPR. Probucol is a lipid-lowering agent usually used to treat hypercholesterolemia. It also exhibits a potent action against oxidative stress [8, 9]. It is still unclear whether probucol affects post-CA ROSC and CA-related injury. In the present study, we observed how probucol treatment changed oxidative stress, hemodynamics, myocardial function, and short-term survival rate in rats following ROSC and analyzed the protective role of probucol in oxidative stress-induced cardiac dysfunction and the mechanisms involved.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Ethics Statement

This project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. The animal study was approved by Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee. All rats were first acclimatized and housed at the research animal laboratory during the experimental period. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, including any relevant details.


### 2.2. Animals

Fifty Sprague Dawley, specific-pathogen-free rats weighing 300 ± 20 g (25 males and 25 females) were provided by the Shanghai Laboratory Animal Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, People’s Republic of China). All diet used met the National Research Council (NRC) nutrient specifications. The rats were fed a standard granulated feed and allowed to drink purified water ad libitum. Before the experiments, all the rats were fed with different dosage of probucol or vehicle through gastric gavage for 5 days. The night before an experiment, the rats were fasted but allowed to drink water ad libitum.For each set of experiments, rats were divided into five groups: sham-operated (n=10); animal model (n=10); low-dose probucol (4 mg/kg) (n=10); medium-dose probucol (8 mg/kg) (n=10); and high-dose probucol (16 mg/kg) (n=10). In the sham-operated group, the procedure used was the same as with the other groups, but CA was not triggered. Unlike the three treatment groups (low-, medium-, and high-dose probucol), the rats in the CA model group were not treated with probucol.


### 2.3. Materials and Equipment

Probucol (0.125 g tablets) was obtained from Qilu Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Shandong Sheng, People’s Republic of China). Before feeding, probucol was suspended in 2 ml of 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt (CMC-Na) solution. The assay kits for MDA, catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione (GSH), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were obtained from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, People’s Republic of China). The rabbit anti-murine KEAP1 (primary antibody), the rabbit anti-murine NFE2L2 (primary antibody) antibodies, and the rabbit two-step kit (secondary antibody) were purchased from Bioss (Beijing, People’s Republic of China). Other reagents used had a known high standard of purity (analytical grade). The TKR-200C small animal ventilator was provided by Beijing Yatai Kelong Instrument Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, People’s Republic of China). An automatic biochemistry analyzer was obtained from Shenzhen iCubio Biomedical Technology Co. Ltd. (Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China), and the BL-420F Data Acquisition & Analysis System was obtained from Chengdu Techman Software Co. Ltd. (Chengdu, People’s Republic of China).


### 2.4. Methods

#### 2.4.1. Animal Model of Cardiac Arrest (CA)

The animal model of CA was established with electrical stimulation of the esophagus. In brief, each rat was anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (60 mg/kg). Then, the rat was placed on a small animal ventilator (tidal volume: 7.5 ml/kg; breathing rate: 80 breaths/min) and underwent a tracheotomy. A catheter was inserted into the right femoral artery to monitor blood pressure, and a probe was inserted into each of the upper limbs to record the standard lead II electrocardiogram. Once the typical left ventricular pressure waveform appeared, a bipolar pacing electrode lead was inserted into the rat’s mouth and then the esophagus. The rat rested for 10 min; this rest period was followed by electrical stimulation of the esophagus (frequency: 50 Hz; pulse width: 15 ms; amplitude: 6 mA; duration: 120 s). CA lasted for 5 min, and CPR was initiated when the systolic arterial pressure dropped to 20 mmHg. During CPR, cardiac compression was performed, and pure oxygen was given. If a spontaneous cardiac rhythm was not restored within 1 min, epinephrine was injected. ROSC was defined as the restoration of a spontaneous cardiac rhythm, the presence of a supraventricular rhythm, and a mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 60 mmHg persisting for 10 min. If ROSC was not achieved after 10 min of CPR, the rat was considered dead and was excluded from the study. The rate of ROSC was calculated as follows:(1)ROSCrate%=nN×100%,where n = the number of rats with ROSC and N = the total number of rats with CA.


#### 2.4.2. Determination of Biochemistry Parameters

All rats were sacrificed 12 hours after ROSC. The serum samples were collected from right ventricle blood immediately after animal death. Then, the rat hearts were harvested, and the left ventricular myocardial tissue was collected. For each sample, half of the myocardial tissue was homogenized and filtered to collect fluid for biochemistry assay following manufacturer’s protocols. The remainder of the tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and used for immunohistochemistry analysis.Ten [10] of random serum and myocardial tissue extract samples from each experimental group were used to measure a panel of major antioxidant enzymes including catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) for the antioxidant actions of probucol. We also measured the malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. All the biochemistry assay kits were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, People’s Republic of China).


#### 2.4.3. Hemodynamic Monitoring

Twelve hours after ROSC, hemodynamic monitoring for heart rate (HR), MAP, maximal rate of rising of left ventricular pressure (+dP/dtmax), and maximal rate of fall of left ventricle pressure (−dP/dtmax) was conducted.


#### 2.4.4. Myocardial Function Monitoring

Twelve hours after ROSC, the following parameters were measured with ultrasonography: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and short-axis shortening.


#### 2.4.5. Immunohistochemistry Assay of KEAP1 and NFE2L2 Expression

Streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase immunohistochemistry was used to assay KEAP1 and NFE2L2; immunoreactive cells were defined as those with light brown or brown granules present in the cytoplasm. Immunoreactive cells were counted in five visual fields (×200 magnification) randomly selected in each slide. The staining intensity of slides was determined as follows: 0—immunoreactive cell count ≤ 10%; 1 point—immunoreactive cell count = 11–30%; 2 points—immunoreactive cell count = 31–50%; 3 points—immunoreactive cell count = 51–70%; and 4 points—immunoreactive cell count > 71%. The staining intensity of immunoreactive cells was determined as follows: 0—same color as the background or no stain; 1 point—light brown; 2 points—pale brown; and 3 points—brown.


#### 2.4.6. Western Blot

Experimental rats were sacrificed 12 hours after ROSC. Then, the rat hearts were harvested and the left ventricular myocardial tissue was collected, homogenized, and lysed with lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA) containing 0.5 mM of phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Protein concentration was determined by BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA). Samples of 25μg protein were fractionated by SDS-PAGE in 4–20% gradient Tris-glycine precast gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membrane was incubated for 1 hour in blocking solution containing 5% nonfat milk powder and 0.1% Tween-20, pH 7.6. This was followed by an overnight incubation at 4°C in blocking solution containing rabbit primary antibodies against KEAP1 (D6B12, Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA). Subsequently, the labeled proteins were visualized by incubation with a horseradish peroxidase- (HRP-) conjugated anti-goat or rabbit IgG (1 : 2000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) followed by development with a chemiluminescence substrate for HRP (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The images of Western blots were captured by GE imageQuant.


### 2.5. Data Analysis

Measurement data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (x¯±s); enumeration data are expressed as percentages. All data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA). Differences among groups were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA; differences between groups were analyzed with a t-test. Enumeration data were analyzed with a Chi-square test. P<0.05 was deemed statistically significant.


## 2.1. Ethics Statement

This project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. The animal study was approved by Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee. All rats were first acclimatized and housed at the research animal laboratory during the experimental period. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, including any relevant details.


## 2.2. Animals

Fifty Sprague Dawley, specific-pathogen-free rats weighing 300 ± 20 g (25 males and 25 females) were provided by the Shanghai Laboratory Animal Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, People’s Republic of China). All diet used met the National Research Council (NRC) nutrient specifications. The rats were fed a standard granulated feed and allowed to drink purified water ad libitum. Before the experiments, all the rats were fed with different dosage of probucol or vehicle through gastric gavage for 5 days. The night before an experiment, the rats were fasted but allowed to drink water ad libitum.For each set of experiments, rats were divided into five groups: sham-operated (n=10); animal model (n=10); low-dose probucol (4 mg/kg) (n=10); medium-dose probucol (8 mg/kg) (n=10); and high-dose probucol (16 mg/kg) (n=10). In the sham-operated group, the procedure used was the same as with the other groups, but CA was not triggered. Unlike the three treatment groups (low-, medium-, and high-dose probucol), the rats in the CA model group were not treated with probucol.


## 2.3. Materials and Equipment

Probucol (0.125 g tablets) was obtained from Qilu Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Shandong Sheng, People’s Republic of China). Before feeding, probucol was suspended in 2 ml of 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt (CMC-Na) solution. The assay kits for MDA, catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione (GSH), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were obtained from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, People’s Republic of China). The rabbit anti-murine KEAP1 (primary antibody), the rabbit anti-murine NFE2L2 (primary antibody) antibodies, and the rabbit two-step kit (secondary antibody) were purchased from Bioss (Beijing, People’s Republic of China). Other reagents used had a known high standard of purity (analytical grade). The TKR-200C small animal ventilator was provided by Beijing Yatai Kelong Instrument Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, People’s Republic of China). An automatic biochemistry analyzer was obtained from Shenzhen iCubio Biomedical Technology Co. Ltd. (Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China), and the BL-420F Data Acquisition & Analysis System was obtained from Chengdu Techman Software Co. Ltd. (Chengdu, People’s Republic of China).


## 2.4. Methods

### 2.4.1. Animal Model of Cardiac Arrest (CA)

The animal model of CA was established with electrical stimulation of the esophagus. In brief, each rat was anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (60 mg/kg). Then, the rat was placed on a small animal ventilator (tidal volume: 7.5 ml/kg; breathing rate: 80 breaths/min) and underwent a tracheotomy. A catheter was inserted into the right femoral artery to monitor blood pressure, and a probe was inserted into each of the upper limbs to record the standard lead II electrocardiogram. Once the typical left ventricular pressure waveform appeared, a bipolar pacing electrode lead was inserted into the rat’s mouth and then the esophagus. The rat rested for 10 min; this rest period was followed by electrical stimulation of the esophagus (frequency: 50 Hz; pulse width: 15 ms; amplitude: 6 mA; duration: 120 s). CA lasted for 5 min, and CPR was initiated when the systolic arterial pressure dropped to 20 mmHg. During CPR, cardiac compression was performed, and pure oxygen was given. If a spontaneous cardiac rhythm was not restored within 1 min, epinephrine was injected. ROSC was defined as the restoration of a spontaneous cardiac rhythm, the presence of a supraventricular rhythm, and a mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 60 mmHg persisting for 10 min. If ROSC was not achieved after 10 min of CPR, the rat was considered dead and was excluded from the study. The rate of ROSC was calculated as follows:(1)ROSCrate%=nN×100%,where n = the number of rats with ROSC and N = the total number of rats with CA.


### 2.4.2. Determination of Biochemistry Parameters

All rats were sacrificed 12 hours after ROSC. The serum samples were collected from right ventricle blood immediately after animal death. Then, the rat hearts were harvested, and the left ventricular myocardial tissue was collected. For each sample, half of the myocardial tissue was homogenized and filtered to collect fluid for biochemistry assay following manufacturer’s protocols. The remainder of the tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and used for immunohistochemistry analysis.Ten [10] of random serum and myocardial tissue extract samples from each experimental group were used to measure a panel of major antioxidant enzymes including catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) for the antioxidant actions of probucol. We also measured the malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. All the biochemistry assay kits were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, People’s Republic of China).


### 2.4.3. Hemodynamic Monitoring

Twelve hours after ROSC, hemodynamic monitoring for heart rate (HR), MAP, maximal rate of rising of left ventricular pressure (+dP/dtmax), and maximal rate of fall of left ventricle pressure (−dP/dtmax) was conducted.


### 2.4.4. Myocardial Function Monitoring

Twelve hours after ROSC, the following parameters were measured with ultrasonography: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and short-axis shortening.


### 2.4.5. Immunohistochemistry Assay of KEAP1 and NFE2L2 Expression

Streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase immunohistochemistry was used to assay KEAP1 and NFE2L2; immunoreactive cells were defined as those with light brown or brown granules present in the cytoplasm. Immunoreactive cells were counted in five visual fields (×200 magnification) randomly selected in each slide. The staining intensity of slides was determined as follows: 0—immunoreactive cell count ≤ 10%; 1 point—immunoreactive cell count = 11–30%; 2 points—immunoreactive cell count = 31–50%; 3 points—immunoreactive cell count = 51–70%; and 4 points—immunoreactive cell count > 71%. The staining intensity of immunoreactive cells was determined as follows: 0—same color as the background or no stain; 1 point—light brown; 2 points—pale brown; and 3 points—brown.


### 2.4.6. Western Blot

Experimental rats were sacrificed 12 hours after ROSC. Then, the rat hearts were harvested and the left ventricular myocardial tissue was collected, homogenized, and lysed with lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA) containing 0.5 mM of phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Protein concentration was determined by BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA). Samples of 25μg protein were fractionated by SDS-PAGE in 4–20% gradient Tris-glycine precast gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membrane was incubated for 1 hour in blocking solution containing 5% nonfat milk powder and 0.1% Tween-20, pH 7.6. This was followed by an overnight incubation at 4°C in blocking solution containing rabbit primary antibodies against KEAP1 (D6B12, Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA). Subsequently, the labeled proteins were visualized by incubation with a horseradish peroxidase- (HRP-) conjugated anti-goat or rabbit IgG (1 : 2000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) followed by development with a chemiluminescence substrate for HRP (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The images of Western blots were captured by GE imageQuant.


## 2.4.1. Animal Model of Cardiac Arrest (CA)

The animal model of CA was established with electrical stimulation of the esophagus. In brief, each rat was anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (60 mg/kg). Then, the rat was placed on a small animal ventilator (tidal volume: 7.5 ml/kg; breathing rate: 80 breaths/min) and underwent a tracheotomy. A catheter was inserted into the right femoral artery to monitor blood pressure, and a probe was inserted into each of the upper limbs to record the standard lead II electrocardiogram. Once the typical left ventricular pressure waveform appeared, a bipolar pacing electrode lead was inserted into the rat’s mouth and then the esophagus. The rat rested for 10 min; this rest period was followed by electrical stimulation of the esophagus (frequency: 50 Hz; pulse width: 15 ms; amplitude: 6 mA; duration: 120 s). CA lasted for 5 min, and CPR was initiated when the systolic arterial pressure dropped to 20 mmHg. During CPR, cardiac compression was performed, and pure oxygen was given. If a spontaneous cardiac rhythm was not restored within 1 min, epinephrine was injected. ROSC was defined as the restoration of a spontaneous cardiac rhythm, the presence of a supraventricular rhythm, and a mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 60 mmHg persisting for 10 min. If ROSC was not achieved after 10 min of CPR, the rat was considered dead and was excluded from the study. The rate of ROSC was calculated as follows:(1)ROSCrate%=nN×100%,where n = the number of rats with ROSC and N = the total number of rats with CA.


## 2.4.2. Determination of Biochemistry Parameters

All rats were sacrificed 12 hours after ROSC. The serum samples were collected from right ventricle blood immediately after animal death. Then, the rat hearts were harvested, and the left ventricular myocardial tissue was collected. For each sample, half of the myocardial tissue was homogenized and filtered to collect fluid for biochemistry assay following manufacturer’s protocols. The remainder of the tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and used for immunohistochemistry analysis.Ten [10] of random serum and myocardial tissue extract samples from each experimental group were used to measure a panel of major antioxidant enzymes including catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) for the antioxidant actions of probucol. We also measured the malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. All the biochemistry assay kits were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, People’s Republic of China).


## 2.4.3. Hemodynamic Monitoring

Twelve hours after ROSC, hemodynamic monitoring for heart rate (HR), MAP, maximal rate of rising of left ventricular pressure (+dP/dtmax), and maximal rate of fall of left ventricle pressure (−dP/dtmax) was conducted.


## 2.4.4. Myocardial Function Monitoring

Twelve hours after ROSC, the following parameters were measured with ultrasonography: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and short-axis shortening.


## 2.4.5. Immunohistochemistry Assay of KEAP1 and NFE2L2 Expression

Streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase immunohistochemistry was used to assay KEAP1 and NFE2L2; immunoreactive cells were defined as those with light brown or brown granules present in the cytoplasm. Immunoreactive cells were counted in five visual fields (×200 magnification) randomly selected in each slide. The staining intensity of slides was determined as follows: 0—immunoreactive cell count ≤ 10%; 1 point—immunoreactive cell count = 11–30%; 2 points—immunoreactive cell count = 31–50%; 3 points—immunoreactive cell count = 51–70%; and 4 points—immunoreactive cell count > 71%. The staining intensity of immunoreactive cells was determined as follows: 0—same color as the background or no stain; 1 point—light brown; 2 points—pale brown; and 3 points—brown.


## 2.4.6. Western Blot

Experimental rats were sacrificed 12 hours after ROSC. Then, the rat hearts were harvested and the left ventricular myocardial tissue was collected, homogenized, and lysed with lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA) containing 0.5 mM of phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Protein concentration was determined by BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA). Samples of 25μg protein were fractionated by SDS-PAGE in 4–20% gradient Tris-glycine precast gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membrane was incubated for 1 hour in blocking solution containing 5% nonfat milk powder and 0.1% Tween-20, pH 7.6. This was followed by an overnight incubation at 4°C in blocking solution containing rabbit primary antibodies against KEAP1 (D6B12, Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA). Subsequently, the labeled proteins were visualized by incubation with a horseradish peroxidase- (HRP-) conjugated anti-goat or rabbit IgG (1 : 2000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) followed by development with a chemiluminescence substrate for HRP (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The images of Western blots were captured by GE imageQuant.


## 2.5. Data Analysis

Measurement data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (x¯±s); enumeration data are expressed as percentages. All data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA). Differences among groups were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA; differences between groups were analyzed with a t-test. Enumeration data were analyzed with a Chi-square test. P<0.05 was deemed statistically significant.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Effect of Probucol on ROSC Rate

The average of success rate of CA was 80% (40/50). As shown in Figure1, ROSC rates after CPR in CA-induced rats were 60%, 60%, and 80% in the three probucol treatment groups. In the CA model group without probucol treatment, the ROSC rate was 50%. The ROSC rate differed significantly between the high-dose group and the animal model group (P=0.001).Figure 1
Effect of different dosage of probucol on the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate in rats after induced cardiac arrest (CA) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Data are from three sets of experiments and expressed in relative percentage ROSC rate and as mean ± SD.∗∗P<0.001. n.s.: not significant.


### 3.2. Effect of Probucol on Short-Term Survival Rate

As shown in Figure2, the median survival time differed significantly between the probucol treatment groups (3.3, 5.5, and 6.5 d, resp.) and the animal model group (2.1 d) (P=0.01 with one-way ANOVA). Survival was significantly more prolonged in the high-dose group than in the other two treatment groups.Figure 2
Effect of different dosage of probucol on survival time following ROSC of CA model-induced rats. Data use death as an end point and are expressed as Kaplan–Meier plot with the time (days) against relative percentage survival rate.


### 3.3. Effect of Probucol on Plasma MDA Level and Antioxidant Enzymes Post-CA ROSC

#### 3.3.1. Effect of Probucol on Systemic Oxidative Parameters

Twelve hours after ROSC, compared with the sham-operated group, the animal model groups displayed significant increase in serum MDA levels (P<0.01) but significant decreases in the activity of antioxidant enzymes: CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD (P<0.01) (Table 1). Compared to the untreated animal CA model group, the probucol treatment group, especially the medium- and high-dose groups, displayed significant decrease in serum MDA levels (P<0.01). In contrast, compared to the untreated CA model group, the probucol treatment groups displayed significant increases in the activity of CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD (P<0.05 or P<0.01). These changes followed a dose-dependent pattern across the probucol treatment groups, that is, some parameters differed significantly between the medium- and high-dose and low-dose groups (P<0.05 or P<0.01) and between the high-dose and medium-dose groups (P<0.05).Table 1
Effect of probucol on serum MDA and antioxidant enzyme activities 12 hours after ROSC (x¯±s; n=10).
Group
MDA (mmol/l)
CAT (U/l)
GPx (U/l)
GSH (U/l)
SOD (U/l)
Sham operated
1.16 ± 0.12
2.32 ± 0.76
1.62 ± 0.47
1.47 ± 0.45
1.80 ± 0.43
CA model
3.07 ± 0.67∗∗
0.97 ± 0.32∗∗
0.75 ± 0.23∗∗
0.65 ± 0.10∗∗
0.75 ± 0.21∗∗
CA + low dose
2.98 ± 0.93
1.04 ± 0.43
1.11 ± 0.61†
0.83 ± 0.25
1.03 ± 0.31†
CA + medium dose
1.94 ± 0.45‡§
1.77 ± 0.55‡§
1.42 ± 0.40‡
1.04 ± 0.52†§
1.33 ± 0.53†
CA + high dose
1.45 ± 0.46‡¶††
2.02 ± 0.74‡¶††
1.50 ± 0.35‡§
1.28 ± 0.40‡§
1.49 ± 0.35‡§
∗
∗
P
<
0.01 versus the sham-operated group; †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01 versus the animal CA model group; §P<0.05 and ¶P<0.01 versus the low-dose group; ††P<0.05 versus the medium-dose group. CAT: catalase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; GSH: glutathione; MAD: malondialdehyde; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation; SOD: superoxide dismutase.


#### 3.3.2. Effect of Probucol on Myocardial Oxidative Stress Parameters

Twelve hours after ROSC, compared with the sham-operated group, the animal model groups displayed significant increases in myocardial MDA levels and significant decreases in the myocardial activity of CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD (P<0.01) (Table 2). Among the animal model groups, myocardial MDA levels decreased significantly, but the myocardial activity of CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD increased significantly (P<0.05 or P<0.01) in the probucol treatment groups. These changes followed a dose-dependent pattern across the probucol treatment groups.Table 2
Effect of probucol on myocardial MDA and antioxidant enzyme activities 12 hour after ROSC (x¯±s; n=10).
Group
MDA (mmol/l)
CAT (U/l)
GPx (U/l)
GSH (U/l)
SOD (U/l)
Sham operated
3.18 ± 0.33
3.75 ± 0.82
26.06 ± 3.47
23.53 ± 2.54
1.94 ± 0.61
CA model
5.55 ± 1.07∗∗
1.82 ± 0.40∗∗
15.76 ± 3.02∗∗
13.65 ± 2.11∗∗
0.84 ± 0.34∗∗
CA + low dose
4.80 ± 0.76
1.99 ± 0.34
19.56 ± 2.64†
17.43 ± 2.91†
1.21 ± 0.42†
CA + medium dose
3.43 ± 0.83†§
2.54 ± 0.82‡§
19.34 ± 2.79‡
19.98 ± 3.02†§
1.47 ± 0.60‡
CA + high dose
3.29 ± 0.46‡¶
3.21 ± 0.75‡¶††
22.00 ± 2.35‡§††
19.28 ± 1.45‡§
1.71 ± 0.63‡§
∗
∗
P
<
0.01 versus the sham-operated group; †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01 versus the animal model group; §P<0.05 and ¶P<0.01 versus the low-dose group; ††P<0.05 versus the medium-dose group. CAT: catalase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; GSH: glutathione; MAD: malondialdehyde; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation; SOD: superoxide dismutase.


### 3.4. Effect of Probucol on Hemodynamics

The hemodynamic parameters at baseline did not differ significantly between the study groups before the CA model was established. Twelve hours after ROSC, compared with the sham-operated group, the animal model groups displayed significant decreases in HR, MAP, +dP/dtmax, and −dP/dtmax (P<0.01) (Table 3). Compared to the untreated CA model group, the probucol treatment groups displayed significant improvements in HR, MAP, +dP/dtmax, and −dP/dtmax. These indicators showed an upward trend, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05 or P<0.01). In particular, +dP/dtmax and −dP/dtmax changed more significantly and in a dose-dependent manner across the treatment groups (P<0.05 or P<0.01).Table 3
Effect of probucol on hemodynamic parameters 12 hours after ROSC (x¯±s; n=10).
Group
HR/min
MAP (mmHg)
+dP/dtmax
−dP/dtmax
Sham operated
420.31 ± 17.41
134.44 ± 4.91
6145.63 ± 348.09
4903.41 ± 278.45
CA model
336.63 ± 20.31∗∗
94.62 ± 7.64∗∗
3533.01 ± 135.81∗∗
2698.25 ± 199.32∗∗
CA + low dose
391.34 ± 18.76‡
103.71 ± 4.92
3865.41 ± 219.76†
2937.49 ± 301.76†
CA + medium dose
394.20 ± 17.76‡
105.29 ± 6.29
3904.03 ± 178.62‡§
3231.01 ± 210.93‡§
CA + high dose
408.54 ± 16.29‡
114.94 ± 7.09‡§††
4376.29 ± 185.73‡¶‡‡
3813.13 ± 108.82‡¶‡‡
∗
∗
P
<
0.01 versus the sham-operated group; †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01 versus the animal model group; §P<0.05 and ¶P<0.01 versus the low-dose group; ††P<0.05 and ‡‡P<0.01 versus the medium-dose group. +dP/dtmax: maximal rate of rise of left ventricular pressure; −dP/dtmax: maximal rate of fall of left ventricular pressure HR: heart rate; MAP: mean arterial pressure; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation.


### 3.5. Effect of Probucol on Myocardial Function

Twelve hours after ROSC, compared with the sham-operated group, the animal model groups displayed significant increases in LVESD and LVEDD (P<0.01) and significant decreases in LVEF and short-axis shortening (P<0.01) in the animal model group (Table 4). Compared to the untreated CA model group, the high-dose group displayed significant decreases in LVESD and LVEDD (P<0.05 or P<0.01) and significant increases in LVEF and short-axis shortening (P<0.05 or P<0.01). In addition, these parameters changed in a dose-dependent manner across the probucol treatment groups.Table 4
Effect of probucol on myocardial function 12 hours after ROSC (x¯±s; n=10).
Group
LVESD/mm
LVEDD/mm
LVEF (%)
Short-axis shortening (%)
Sham operated
3.31 ± 0.31
4.57 ± 0.54
83.23 ± 3.80
50.54 ± 3.14
CA model
5.27 ± 1.01∗∗
7.98 ± 0.64∗∗
62.78 ± 4.30∗∗
36.25 ± 2.42∗∗
CA + low dose
5.02 ± 0.78
6.76 ± 0.13†
65.74 ± 4.21
37.59 ± 2.51
CA + medium dose
4.50 ± 0.21†
5.89 ± 0.59‡
68.43 ± 2.96†
41.45 ± 3.49†§
CA + high dose
3.27 ± 0.56‡¶††
4.94 ± 0.70‡§††
73.29 ± 2.08‡¶††
48.81 ± 3.45‡¶††
∗
∗
P
<
0.01 versus the sham-operated group; †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01 versus the animal model group; §P<0.05 and ¶P<0.01 versus the low-dose group; ††P<0.05 versus the medium-dose group. LVEDD: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESD: left ventricular end-systolic diameter; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation.


### 3.6. Effect of Probucol on the Myocardial Expression of KEAP1 and NFE2L2

As shown in Figures3 and 4, KEAP1 and NFE2L2 protein expression tended to show an opposite trend in each group. Compared to the sham-operated group, the KEAP1 expression was upregulated significantly; but NFE2L2 expression was downregulated significantly in the animal model groups (P<0.01) (Table 5). Compared to untreated CA model group, KEAP1 expression was downregulated significantly, but NFE2L2 expression was upregulated significantly in the probucol treatment groups (P<0.05 or P<0.01) and more significantly so in the high-dose group (P<0.01). Such an effect followed a dose-dependent pattern.Figure 3
Effect of different dosage of probucol on myocardial KEAP1 expression in CPR model rats. Representative pictures of immunohistochemistry with anti-KEAP1 as shown as: (a) sham-operated group, (b) animal model group, (c, d, e) low-, medium-, and high-dose probucol groups, respectively. CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation; KEAP1 = Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)Figure 4
Effect of different dosage of probucol on myocardial KEAP1 and NFE2L2 expression in CPR model rats. Representative pictures of immunohistochemistry with anti-KEAP1 as shown as: (a) sham-operated group, (b) animal model group, (c, d, e) low-, medium-, and high-dose probucol groups, respectively. CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation; NFE2L2 = nuclear factor, erythroid-derived 2-like 2.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)Table 5
Effect of probucol on myocardial KEAP1 and NRF2 expression 12 h after ROSC (x¯±s; n=10).
Group
Protein expression level
KEAP1
NFE2L2
Sham operated
2.18 ± 0.67
5.67 ± 0.09
CA model
11.53 ± 2.48∗∗
4.28 ± 0.11∗∗
CA + low dose
7.36 ± 1.83‡
4.46 ± 0.10†
CA + medium dose
7.03 ± 1.38‡
5.13 ± 0.09‡
CA + high dose
5.43 ± 1.44‡¶††
5.35 ± 0.16‡§
∗
∗
P
<
0.01 versus the sham-operated group; †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01 versus the CA model group; §P<0.05 and ¶P<0.01 versus the low-dose group; ††P<0.01 versus the medium-dose group. KEAP1: Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1; NFE2L2: nuclear factor, erythroid-derived 2-like 2; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation.To confirm on Table5, we performed Western blotting analysis using myocardial tissue lysates from the experimental rats. Figure 5 showed that comparing to the sham control (lane b), the CA rat model myocardial tissue contains relatively much more KEAP1 protein level (lane c). The treatment with probucol has dose-dependent reduction of the KEAP1 level 12 hours after ROSC (lanes d–f). Furthermore, the KEAP1 activity is primarily in the cytosolic fraction of the myocardial tissue (lanes g and h). These data are in agreement with the immunohistochemistry results.Figure 5
(a) Western blot analysis using anti-KEAP1 reveals that KEAP1 protein expression is elevated in myocardial tissue of CA model rat heart (C) comparing to sham control rat heart (B ). The effect of probucol moderated the KEAP1 level induced by CA in a dose-dependent manner (D–F). Lane (A) shows KEAP1 by Western blotting with HeLa cell extract. KEAP1 protein is also analyzed in cytosolic (G) and nucleic (H) fractions of myocardial tissues of sham control to show the subcellular localization. (b). Relative density of the KEAP1 protein detected by Western blotting after normalizing with GAPDH. Data are expressed as mean ± SD with three measurements. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data against sham control.∗P<0.05; ∗∗P<0.001; n.s.: not significant.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1. Effect of Probucol on ROSC Rate

The average of success rate of CA was 80% (40/50). As shown in Figure1, ROSC rates after CPR in CA-induced rats were 60%, 60%, and 80% in the three probucol treatment groups. In the CA model group without probucol treatment, the ROSC rate was 50%. The ROSC rate differed significantly between the high-dose group and the animal model group (P=0.001).Figure 1
Effect of different dosage of probucol on the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate in rats after induced cardiac arrest (CA) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Data are from three sets of experiments and expressed in relative percentage ROSC rate and as mean ± SD.∗∗P<0.001. n.s.: not significant.


## 3.2. Effect of Probucol on Short-Term Survival Rate

As shown in Figure2, the median survival time differed significantly between the probucol treatment groups (3.3, 5.5, and 6.5 d, resp.) and the animal model group (2.1 d) (P=0.01 with one-way ANOVA). Survival was significantly more prolonged in the high-dose group than in the other two treatment groups.Figure 2
Effect of different dosage of probucol on survival time following ROSC of CA model-induced rats. Data use death as an end point and are expressed as Kaplan–Meier plot with the time (days) against relative percentage survival rate.


## 3.3. Effect of Probucol on Plasma MDA Level and Antioxidant Enzymes Post-CA ROSC

### 3.3.1. Effect of Probucol on Systemic Oxidative Parameters

Twelve hours after ROSC, compared with the sham-operated group, the animal model groups displayed significant increase in serum MDA levels (P<0.01) but significant decreases in the activity of antioxidant enzymes: CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD (P<0.01) (Table 1). Compared to the untreated animal CA model group, the probucol treatment group, especially the medium- and high-dose groups, displayed significant decrease in serum MDA levels (P<0.01). In contrast, compared to the untreated CA model group, the probucol treatment groups displayed significant increases in the activity of CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD (P<0.05 or P<0.01). These changes followed a dose-dependent pattern across the probucol treatment groups, that is, some parameters differed significantly between the medium- and high-dose and low-dose groups (P<0.05 or P<0.01) and between the high-dose and medium-dose groups (P<0.05).Table 1
Effect of probucol on serum MDA and antioxidant enzyme activities 12 hours after ROSC (x¯±s; n=10).
Group
MDA (mmol/l)
CAT (U/l)
GPx (U/l)
GSH (U/l)
SOD (U/l)
Sham operated
1.16 ± 0.12
2.32 ± 0.76
1.62 ± 0.47
1.47 ± 0.45
1.80 ± 0.43
CA model
3.07 ± 0.67∗∗
0.97 ± 0.32∗∗
0.75 ± 0.23∗∗
0.65 ± 0.10∗∗
0.75 ± 0.21∗∗
CA + low dose
2.98 ± 0.93
1.04 ± 0.43
1.11 ± 0.61†
0.83 ± 0.25
1.03 ± 0.31†
CA + medium dose
1.94 ± 0.45‡§
1.77 ± 0.55‡§
1.42 ± 0.40‡
1.04 ± 0.52†§
1.33 ± 0.53†
CA + high dose
1.45 ± 0.46‡¶††
2.02 ± 0.74‡¶††
1.50 ± 0.35‡§
1.28 ± 0.40‡§
1.49 ± 0.35‡§
∗
∗
P
<
0.01 versus the sham-operated group; †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01 versus the animal CA model group; §P<0.05 and ¶P<0.01 versus the low-dose group; ††P<0.05 versus the medium-dose group. CAT: catalase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; GSH: glutathione; MAD: malondialdehyde; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation; SOD: superoxide dismutase.


### 3.3.2. Effect of Probucol on Myocardial Oxidative Stress Parameters

Twelve hours after ROSC, compared with the sham-operated group, the animal model groups displayed significant increases in myocardial MDA levels and significant decreases in the myocardial activity of CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD (P<0.01) (Table 2). Among the animal model groups, myocardial MDA levels decreased significantly, but the myocardial activity of CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD increased significantly (P<0.05 or P<0.01) in the probucol treatment groups. These changes followed a dose-dependent pattern across the probucol treatment groups.Table 2
Effect of probucol on myocardial MDA and antioxidant enzyme activities 12 hour after ROSC (x¯±s; n=10).
Group
MDA (mmol/l)
CAT (U/l)
GPx (U/l)
GSH (U/l)
SOD (U/l)
Sham operated
3.18 ± 0.33
3.75 ± 0.82
26.06 ± 3.47
23.53 ± 2.54
1.94 ± 0.61
CA model
5.55 ± 1.07∗∗
1.82 ± 0.40∗∗
15.76 ± 3.02∗∗
13.65 ± 2.11∗∗
0.84 ± 0.34∗∗
CA + low dose
4.80 ± 0.76
1.99 ± 0.34
19.56 ± 2.64†
17.43 ± 2.91†
1.21 ± 0.42†
CA + medium dose
3.43 ± 0.83†§
2.54 ± 0.82‡§
19.34 ± 2.79‡
19.98 ± 3.02†§
1.47 ± 0.60‡
CA + high dose
3.29 ± 0.46‡¶
3.21 ± 0.75‡¶††
22.00 ± 2.35‡§††
19.28 ± 1.45‡§
1.71 ± 0.63‡§
∗
∗
P
<
0.01 versus the sham-operated group; †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01 versus the animal model group; §P<0.05 and ¶P<0.01 versus the low-dose group; ††P<0.05 versus the medium-dose group. CAT: catalase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; GSH: glutathione; MAD: malondialdehyde; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation; SOD: superoxide dismutase.


## 3.3.1. Effect of Probucol on Systemic Oxidative Parameters

Twelve hours after ROSC, compared with the sham-operated group, the animal model groups displayed significant increase in serum MDA levels (P<0.01) but significant decreases in the activity of antioxidant enzymes: CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD (P<0.01) (Table 1). Compared to the untreated animal CA model group, the probucol treatment group, especially the medium- and high-dose groups, displayed significant decrease in serum MDA levels (P<0.01). In contrast, compared to the untreated CA model group, the probucol treatment groups displayed significant increases in the activity of CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD (P<0.05 or P<0.01). These changes followed a dose-dependent pattern across the probucol treatment groups, that is, some parameters differed significantly between the medium- and high-dose and low-dose groups (P<0.05 or P<0.01) and between the high-dose and medium-dose groups (P<0.05).Table 1
Effect of probucol on serum MDA and antioxidant enzyme activities 12 hours after ROSC (x¯±s; n=10).
Group
MDA (mmol/l)
CAT (U/l)
GPx (U/l)
GSH (U/l)
SOD (U/l)
Sham operated
1.16 ± 0.12
2.32 ± 0.76
1.62 ± 0.47
1.47 ± 0.45
1.80 ± 0.43
CA model
3.07 ± 0.67∗∗
0.97 ± 0.32∗∗
0.75 ± 0.23∗∗
0.65 ± 0.10∗∗
0.75 ± 0.21∗∗
CA + low dose
2.98 ± 0.93
1.04 ± 0.43
1.11 ± 0.61†
0.83 ± 0.25
1.03 ± 0.31†
CA + medium dose
1.94 ± 0.45‡§
1.77 ± 0.55‡§
1.42 ± 0.40‡
1.04 ± 0.52†§
1.33 ± 0.53†
CA + high dose
1.45 ± 0.46‡¶††
2.02 ± 0.74‡¶††
1.50 ± 0.35‡§
1.28 ± 0.40‡§
1.49 ± 0.35‡§
∗
∗
P
<
0.01 versus the sham-operated group; †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01 versus the animal CA model group; §P<0.05 and ¶P<0.01 versus the low-dose group; ††P<0.05 versus the medium-dose group. CAT: catalase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; GSH: glutathione; MAD: malondialdehyde; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation; SOD: superoxide dismutase.


## 3.3.2. Effect of Probucol on Myocardial Oxidative Stress Parameters

Twelve hours after ROSC, compared with the sham-operated group, the animal model groups displayed significant increases in myocardial MDA levels and significant decreases in the myocardial activity of CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD (P<0.01) (Table 2). Among the animal model groups, myocardial MDA levels decreased significantly, but the myocardial activity of CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD increased significantly (P<0.05 or P<0.01) in the probucol treatment groups. These changes followed a dose-dependent pattern across the probucol treatment groups.Table 2
Effect of probucol on myocardial MDA and antioxidant enzyme activities 12 hour after ROSC (x¯±s; n=10).
Group
MDA (mmol/l)
CAT (U/l)
GPx (U/l)
GSH (U/l)
SOD (U/l)
Sham operated
3.18 ± 0.33
3.75 ± 0.82
26.06 ± 3.47
23.53 ± 2.54
1.94 ± 0.61
CA model
5.55 ± 1.07∗∗
1.82 ± 0.40∗∗
15.76 ± 3.02∗∗
13.65 ± 2.11∗∗
0.84 ± 0.34∗∗
CA + low dose
4.80 ± 0.76
1.99 ± 0.34
19.56 ± 2.64†
17.43 ± 2.91†
1.21 ± 0.42†
CA + medium dose
3.43 ± 0.83†§
2.54 ± 0.82‡§
19.34 ± 2.79‡
19.98 ± 3.02†§
1.47 ± 0.60‡
CA + high dose
3.29 ± 0.46‡¶
3.21 ± 0.75‡¶††
22.00 ± 2.35‡§††
19.28 ± 1.45‡§
1.71 ± 0.63‡§
∗
∗
P
<
0.01 versus the sham-operated group; †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01 versus the animal model group; §P<0.05 and ¶P<0.01 versus the low-dose group; ††P<0.05 versus the medium-dose group. CAT: catalase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; GSH: glutathione; MAD: malondialdehyde; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation; SOD: superoxide dismutase.


## 3.4. Effect of Probucol on Hemodynamics

The hemodynamic parameters at baseline did not differ significantly between the study groups before the CA model was established. Twelve hours after ROSC, compared with the sham-operated group, the animal model groups displayed significant decreases in HR, MAP, +dP/dtmax, and −dP/dtmax (P<0.01) (Table 3). Compared to the untreated CA model group, the probucol treatment groups displayed significant improvements in HR, MAP, +dP/dtmax, and −dP/dtmax. These indicators showed an upward trend, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05 or P<0.01). In particular, +dP/dtmax and −dP/dtmax changed more significantly and in a dose-dependent manner across the treatment groups (P<0.05 or P<0.01).Table 3
Effect of probucol on hemodynamic parameters 12 hours after ROSC (x¯±s; n=10).
Group
HR/min
MAP (mmHg)
+dP/dtmax
−dP/dtmax
Sham operated
420.31 ± 17.41
134.44 ± 4.91
6145.63 ± 348.09
4903.41 ± 278.45
CA model
336.63 ± 20.31∗∗
94.62 ± 7.64∗∗
3533.01 ± 135.81∗∗
2698.25 ± 199.32∗∗
CA + low dose
391.34 ± 18.76‡
103.71 ± 4.92
3865.41 ± 219.76†
2937.49 ± 301.76†
CA + medium dose
394.20 ± 17.76‡
105.29 ± 6.29
3904.03 ± 178.62‡§
3231.01 ± 210.93‡§
CA + high dose
408.54 ± 16.29‡
114.94 ± 7.09‡§††
4376.29 ± 185.73‡¶‡‡
3813.13 ± 108.82‡¶‡‡
∗
∗
P
<
0.01 versus the sham-operated group; †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01 versus the animal model group; §P<0.05 and ¶P<0.01 versus the low-dose group; ††P<0.05 and ‡‡P<0.01 versus the medium-dose group. +dP/dtmax: maximal rate of rise of left ventricular pressure; −dP/dtmax: maximal rate of fall of left ventricular pressure HR: heart rate; MAP: mean arterial pressure; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation.


## 3.5. Effect of Probucol on Myocardial Function

Twelve hours after ROSC, compared with the sham-operated group, the animal model groups displayed significant increases in LVESD and LVEDD (P<0.01) and significant decreases in LVEF and short-axis shortening (P<0.01) in the animal model group (Table 4). Compared to the untreated CA model group, the high-dose group displayed significant decreases in LVESD and LVEDD (P<0.05 or P<0.01) and significant increases in LVEF and short-axis shortening (P<0.05 or P<0.01). In addition, these parameters changed in a dose-dependent manner across the probucol treatment groups.Table 4
Effect of probucol on myocardial function 12 hours after ROSC (x¯±s; n=10).
Group
LVESD/mm
LVEDD/mm
LVEF (%)
Short-axis shortening (%)
Sham operated
3.31 ± 0.31
4.57 ± 0.54
83.23 ± 3.80
50.54 ± 3.14
CA model
5.27 ± 1.01∗∗
7.98 ± 0.64∗∗
62.78 ± 4.30∗∗
36.25 ± 2.42∗∗
CA + low dose
5.02 ± 0.78
6.76 ± 0.13†
65.74 ± 4.21
37.59 ± 2.51
CA + medium dose
4.50 ± 0.21†
5.89 ± 0.59‡
68.43 ± 2.96†
41.45 ± 3.49†§
CA + high dose
3.27 ± 0.56‡¶††
4.94 ± 0.70‡§††
73.29 ± 2.08‡¶††
48.81 ± 3.45‡¶††
∗
∗
P
<
0.01 versus the sham-operated group; †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01 versus the animal model group; §P<0.05 and ¶P<0.01 versus the low-dose group; ††P<0.05 versus the medium-dose group. LVEDD: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESD: left ventricular end-systolic diameter; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation.


## 3.6. Effect of Probucol on the Myocardial Expression of KEAP1 and NFE2L2

As shown in Figures3 and 4, KEAP1 and NFE2L2 protein expression tended to show an opposite trend in each group. Compared to the sham-operated group, the KEAP1 expression was upregulated significantly; but NFE2L2 expression was downregulated significantly in the animal model groups (P<0.01) (Table 5). Compared to untreated CA model group, KEAP1 expression was downregulated significantly, but NFE2L2 expression was upregulated significantly in the probucol treatment groups (P<0.05 or P<0.01) and more significantly so in the high-dose group (P<0.01). Such an effect followed a dose-dependent pattern.Figure 3
Effect of different dosage of probucol on myocardial KEAP1 expression in CPR model rats. Representative pictures of immunohistochemistry with anti-KEAP1 as shown as: (a) sham-operated group, (b) animal model group, (c, d, e) low-, medium-, and high-dose probucol groups, respectively. CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation; KEAP1 = Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)Figure 4
Effect of different dosage of probucol on myocardial KEAP1 and NFE2L2 expression in CPR model rats. Representative pictures of immunohistochemistry with anti-KEAP1 as shown as: (a) sham-operated group, (b) animal model group, (c, d, e) low-, medium-, and high-dose probucol groups, respectively. CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation; NFE2L2 = nuclear factor, erythroid-derived 2-like 2.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)Table 5
Effect of probucol on myocardial KEAP1 and NRF2 expression 12 h after ROSC (x¯±s; n=10).
Group
Protein expression level
KEAP1
NFE2L2
Sham operated
2.18 ± 0.67
5.67 ± 0.09
CA model
11.53 ± 2.48∗∗
4.28 ± 0.11∗∗
CA + low dose
7.36 ± 1.83‡
4.46 ± 0.10†
CA + medium dose
7.03 ± 1.38‡
5.13 ± 0.09‡
CA + high dose
5.43 ± 1.44‡¶††
5.35 ± 0.16‡§
∗
∗
P
<
0.01 versus the sham-operated group; †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01 versus the CA model group; §P<0.05 and ¶P<0.01 versus the low-dose group; ††P<0.01 versus the medium-dose group. KEAP1: Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1; NFE2L2: nuclear factor, erythroid-derived 2-like 2; ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation.To confirm on Table5, we performed Western blotting analysis using myocardial tissue lysates from the experimental rats. Figure 5 showed that comparing to the sham control (lane b), the CA rat model myocardial tissue contains relatively much more KEAP1 protein level (lane c). The treatment with probucol has dose-dependent reduction of the KEAP1 level 12 hours after ROSC (lanes d–f). Furthermore, the KEAP1 activity is primarily in the cytosolic fraction of the myocardial tissue (lanes g and h). These data are in agreement with the immunohistochemistry results.Figure 5
(a) Western blot analysis using anti-KEAP1 reveals that KEAP1 protein expression is elevated in myocardial tissue of CA model rat heart (C) comparing to sham control rat heart (B ). The effect of probucol moderated the KEAP1 level induced by CA in a dose-dependent manner (D–F). Lane (A) shows KEAP1 by Western blotting with HeLa cell extract. KEAP1 protein is also analyzed in cytosolic (G) and nucleic (H) fractions of myocardial tissues of sham control to show the subcellular localization. (b). Relative density of the KEAP1 protein detected by Western blotting after normalizing with GAPDH. Data are expressed as mean ± SD with three measurements. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data against sham control.∗P<0.05; ∗∗P<0.001; n.s.: not significant.
(a)
(b)


## 4. Discussion

Cardia arrest (CA) is a serious threat to health and a major social and economic burdens. With continuous improvement in CPR techniques, ROSC rates continue to increase; nevertheless, the overall post-ROSC mortality rate remains at around 70% [10]. In the clinical setting, it is difficult to increase the postresuscitation survival rate and improve the long-term prognosis of patients affected by CA. CA usually results from malignant arrhythmias secondary to heart disease [11]. Therefore, early control of arrhythmias, especially ventricular fibrillation, is critical to the management of CA. Postcardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) describes the spectrum of organ dysfunction following ROSC in patients suffering CA; it is the most dangerous consequence of CA. PCAS involves important pathological processes, such as oxidative stress, cardiac dysfunction, hemodynamic changes, and reperfusion injury; these processes are closely associated with the low survival rate after ROSC [12–14]. In clinical settings, epinephrine is the most potent vasoconstrictor agent, and it can increase mean arterial pressure (MAP), promote blood redistribution, and maintain blood supply to vital organs during CPR [15]. Epinephrine has been shown to increase the success rate of CPR significantly, although it has an adverse effect on microcirculation perfusion and the long-term survival rate of patients [16]. Hence, finding drugs that alleviate disturbances in microcirculation after ROSC and improve patient prognosis is key to the prevention and management of PCAS. Here, we tested probucol, an effective lipid-lowering agent that possesses potential antioxidative action and may help the body fight against high levels of reactive oxygen species [17].In the present study, we established a rat model of CA by electrically stimulating the esophagus. This model was able to achieve more than 80% of success rate in rats. Among those CA-induced rats, the ROSC rate increased in all the probucol treatment groups, and it differed significantly between the high-dose group and the untreated CA model group. Previously, some antioxidative agents have been shown to alleviate post-ROSC injury significantly, although they failed to affect the ROSC rate significantly [18, 19]. Treatment with probucol was also thought to bring bigger benefits to CA patients [20]. The present study found that the survival time of rats after CPR was prolonged significantly in all the probucol treatment groups, compared to the untreated CA model group. This demonstrated that probucol provides a potential benefit in patient care especially following CPR treatment.We also tested the systemic oxidative stress level by examination of serum malondialdehyde (MDA). When systemic oxidative stress level is high, it will generate more products of lipid peroxidation, including MDA. The MDA epitopes on LDL particles are now widely accepted as the measurement of systemic oxidative stress markers [21–24]. To test the antioxidant actions of probucol, we also measured a panel of major antioxidant enzymes including catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) [25–28] Due to their antioxidation functions, levels of these enzymes are usually inversely correlated with oxidative stress status of the host. In our results, compared to the sham-operated group, the levels of MDA increased significantly in both serum and myocardium of CA-induced rats, while the activity of CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD decreased significantly in these CA-induced rats, suggesting oxidative stress following CA induction and ROSC, as described in the literature [29] We also found that with the administration of probucol, the serum and myocardial MDA levels were reduced significantly comparing to the untreated CA model rats. At meantime, the activity of antioxidant enzymes CAT, GPx, GSH, and SOD increased significantly in the probucol treatment groups. These changes in oxidative stress parameters were in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that probucol treatment significantly counteracted oxidative stress following ROSC. In addition, the results of this study showed that probucol treatment significantly improved HR, MAP, +dP/dtmax, and −dP/dtmax 12 hours after ROSC. Also, LVESD and LVEDD decreased significantly, and LVEF and short-axis shortening increased significantly in the high-dose group, suggesting that probucol significantly improved hemodynamic parameters and heart function after ROSC. Taken together, the results suggested that probucol treatment significantly relieved CA-induced oxidative stress and ameliorated hemodynamic parameters and heart function after ROSC in CA-affected rats. This may be associated with the increase in ROSC rate and the prolongation of survival time in CA-affected rats after CPR.NFE2L2 is an important transcription factor, and KEAP1 is an upstream regulator of NFE2L2. In organisms, the KEAP1-NFE2L2 system is closely associated with the antioxidant response [30]. Physiologically, NFE2L2 and KEAP1 form inactive complexes. Under oxidative stress, NFE2L2 becomes dissociated from KEAP1 and migrates into the cytonucleus and becomes an active antioxidative factor [31, 32]. The findings of this study indicated that KEAP1 expression was downregulated significantly and NFE2L2 expression was upregulated significantly, in the probucol treatment groups compared to the animal model group (P<0.05 or P<0.01), and especially so in the high-dose group (P<0.01); such an effect followed a dose-dependent pattern. Probucol may have also regulated the expression of the KEAP1-NFE2L2 system, thereby relieving oxidative stress in CA-affected rats after CPR. There are many reports that previously analyzed the influence of promoter activity of downstream genes including HO-1 and NQO-1 during NFE2L2 activation [33–36]. We notice that further study of these downstream genes activities in our experimental setting would provide more mechanistic insights for the protective action of probucol treatment. We will explore these experiments in our future study to add strength to the notion that protection of probucol on CA occurs via KEAP1-NFE2L2 pathway system.


## 5. Conclusion

Treatment with probucol significantly increased ROSC rate and survival time. It also relieved CA-induced oxidative stress and ameliorated hemodynamic parameters and heart function in a dose-dependent manner in rats after CPR, possibly by regulating the expression of the KEAP1-NFE2L2 system.



---

*Source: 1284804-2017-10-30.xml*