# Gear Crack Level Classification Based on EMD and EDT

Authors: Haiping Li; Jianmin Zhao; Xinghui Zhang; Hongzhi Teng
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Gears are the most essential parts in rotating machinery. Crack fault is one of damage modes most frequently occurring in gears. So, this paper deals with the problem of different crack levels classification. The proposed method is mainly based on empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and Euclidean distance technique (EDT). First, vibration signal acquired by accelerometer is processed by EMD and intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) are obtained. Then, a correlation coefficient based method is proposed to select the sensitive IMFs which contain main gear fault information. And energy of these IMFs is chosen as the fault feature by comparing with kurtosis and skewness. Finally, Euclidean distances between test sample and four classes trained samples are calculated, and on this basis, fault level classification of the test sample can be made. The proposed approach is tested and validated through a gearbox experiment, in which four crack levels and three kinds of loads are utilized. The results show that the proposed method has high accuracy rates in classifying different crack levels and may be adaptive to different conditions.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Gearboxes are one of the fundamental and important components of rotating machinery. Its function is to transfer torque and power from one shaft to another. Representative applications involve motorcars, helicopters, and steel mills. Their failures will lead to great power loss and high maintenance fee. Therefore, condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of gearboxes are important topics in maintenance field.Jardine et al. [1] summarized and reviewed the research and developments in diagnostics and prognostics of mechanical systems. They mainly focused on models, algorithms, and technologies of data processing and maintenance decision-making. Samuel and Pines [2] reviewed vibration-based diagnosis techniques for helicopter transmission system. The importance of condition monitoring for gearbox was emphasized from cost and safety point of view. In addition, features used for fault diagnosis and remaining useful lifetime prediction were introduced. Meanwhile, various fault detection methods of gearbox were discussed. Lebold et al. [3] reviewed feature extraction methods for gearbox diagnosis and prognosis. Samuel and Pines [4] and McFadden [5, 6] separated the vibration signal of planet and sun gears using time domain averaging. Halim et al. [7] combined time synchronous average and wavelet transformation together to extract periodic waveforms at different scales from noisy vibration signals to clean up noise and detect both local and distributed faults simultaneously. Feng et al. [8] proposed a regularization dimension technique to make vibration signals increase monotonically with respect to gear fault levels. Zhang et al. [9, 10] used narrow band interference cancellation to enhance the gearbox fault diagnosis and extract effective degradation indicator which is not sensitive to the nonstationary condition. In addition, many other techniques have been used in fault diagnosis of gearboxes, such as support vector machine (SVM) [11, 12], wavelet packet transformation (WPT) [13], artificial neural network (ANN) [14], and hidden Markov model (HMM) [15–17].For gearbox fault diagnosis, fault level classification is more difficult than fault detection. However, limited papers reported research topic about different fault levels identification. Typical faults of gears include pitting, chipping, and crack [18, 19]. In particular for gear crack fault, it is difficult to diagnose. Loutridis [19, 20] utilized instantaneous energy density and local scaling exponent algorithm to detect gear crack and identify crack levels effectively. Lei and Zuo [21] proposed a gear crack level identification method based on weighted KNN classification algorithm. However, the above methods require the expertise of an engineer to apply them successfully. A dilemma of crack level classification is early fault detection. This is a challenge to traditional method. Taking frequency spectrum analysis as an example, it is based on the amplitude changing of fault characteristic frequency. Due to the fact that the amplitude changing is not very large between early fault and normal condition, the phenomenon is not obvious in its frequency spectrum and it is very difficult to detect the early fault. However, the minor changing can be reflected in an IMF obtained using EMD. Then the changing will be very obvious after being amplified by IMF. Thus, EMD is very adaptive to early fault detection of gearbox. In addition, EDT is a useful method to help in automotive fault diagnosis and fault level classification. Therefore, this paper proposed a fault level classification method based on EMD and EDT, which has a good performance in early gear crack fault. A correlation coefficient based method is also proposed to select the sensitive IMFs which contain main gear fault information. By comparing with kurtosis and skewness, it is found that energy of these IMFs is the most suitable feature to be used in fault level classification. The effectiveness of the proposed method has been validated through analyzing gearbox experimental data.The remaining sections of this paper are organized as follows. In Section2, framework of the proposed gear crack level classification method is given. Section 3 describes the experiment and applies the proposed method to fault level diagnosis. Finally, conclusions are given in Section 4.


## 2. Framework of the Proposed Method

Hilbert Huang transform (HHT) is a new signal processing method developed by Huang et al. [22]. It contains two parts: EMD and Hilbert spectrum analysis method. As the kernel of HHT, EMD has been developed and widely used in fault diagnosis of rotating machinery recently [23–26]. Using EMD, the complex signal can be decomposed into a set of complete, simple, and almost orthogonal components named intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). The IMFs represent the natural oscillatory mode embedded in the signal and work as the basis functions, which are determined by the signal itself. And the IMFs should satisfy the following two conditions: (1) in the whole data set, the number of extrema and the number of zero-crossings must either be equal or differ at most by one and (2) at any point, the mean value of the envelope defined by local maxima and minima must be zero. Namely, local signal is symmetrical about the time axis.EMD is developed based on the assumption that any signal consists of many different IMFs. The procedures of decomposing a given signalx(t) to different IMFs can be categorized into the following steps. First, identify all the local extrema from the given signal and then connect them with a cubic spline line as the upper envelope lmax(t). Second, repeat the first step for the local minima to produce the lower envelope lmin(t). The upper and lower envelopes should cover the entire signal between them. Third, compute their mean as m1(t) and the difference between the signal x(t) and m1(t) is h1(t). Consider(1)m1t=lmaxt+lmint2,h1t=xt-m1t.Ideally, after the sifting operation of (1), h1(t) should be the first IMF. The construction of h1(t) described above seems to satisfy all the requirements of IMF. However, during the practical process, the theoretical upper envelope lmax(t) and lower envelope lmin(t) are very difficult to calculate. In addition, any little inflection points of the monotonous signal can be transformed to new extrema. And these new extremas should be contained by the next sifting operation. To solve this dilemma, Huang et al. [22] repeated the sifting process of (1) as many times as required to reduce the extracted signal to an IMF. Therefore, the fourth step is to repeat the sifting process by treating h1(t) as the original signal as follows:(2)m11t=l1maxt+l1mint2,h11t=h1t-m11t.The sifting process will be repeatedk times until h1k(t) becomes a true IMF; that is,(3)h1kt=h1k-1t-m1k-1t.Then, makec1(t)=h1k(t), and it can be seemed as the first IMF. Remove c1(t) from the signal x(t); namely,(4)r1t=xt-c1t.And generate the residue signalr1(t). Treating r1(t) as a new original signal and repeating the same sifting process above, the second IMF can be getted. Similarly, a series of IMFs (ci(t)(i=1,2,…,n)) can be obtained until the final residue rn(t) is monotonous. Then the original signal x(t) can be reconstructed as(5)xt=∑i=1ncit+rnt.The IMFsc1,c2,…,cn represent different frequency bands ranging from high to low. The frequency components contained in each frequency band are different and they change with the variation of the original signal x(t), and rn(t) represents the central tendency of signal x(t).After getting all the IMFs of a signal, sensitive IMFs which contain main fault information should be selected to promote the velocity of calculation. This paper proposed a correlation coefficient based method to select sensitive IMFs, as follows.(1)
Assume one test sample of fault statexfault(t) produced K IMFs ck(t)(k=1,2,…,K) after being processed by EMD; compute the correlation coefficients αk of ck(t) and xfault(t).(2)
Similarly, compute the correlation coefficientsβk of ck(t) and xnormal(t).(3)
Calculate the fault factorsλk based on αk and βk; namely,(6)λk=αk-βk,k=1,2,…,K.(4)
Analyze the fault factors and select theP bigger value corresponding cp(t) as the IMFs which contain the main fault information.Then, the selected sensitive IMFs can be inputted into EDT. The algorithm is implemented by computing the Euclidean distances between the test sample and the trained sample as(7)Dij2=Xi-XjTXi-Xj=Xi-Xj2=∑p=1Pxip-xjp2,where Xi is the test sample belonging to the unknown class and Xj is the trained sample belonging to known class, class ω. And p=1,2,…,P is the number of the selected IMFs.Therefore, a feature parameter set{Empq,m=1,2,…,M;p=1,2,…,P;q=1,2,…,Q} can be acquired before computing the Euclidean distances between the test samples and the trained samples, which is an M-by-P-by-Q matrix, where m is the mth crack level of gears, p is the pth IMF, and q is the qth test sample. Then the feature vector matrix can be built as(8)Tmq=Emq1,Emq2,…,Empq,m=1,2,…,Mq=1,2,…,Q.Euclidean distances between the test sample and trained samples can be calculated. If the distances between this test sample and each trained sample satisfy(9)D2X,ωi<D2X,ωj,i,j=1,2,…,M,i≠j,then the test sample belongs to class ω.Following the procedure described above, the crack level classification of gears can be performed. The classification process can be summarized as follows.(1)
Acquire vibration signal.(2)
Obtain IMFs by signal processing and EMD.(3)
Select the sensitive IMFs which contain main fault information.(4)
Extract feature parameters of sensitive IMFs and build the feature vector matrix.(5)
Obtain the diagnosis result using EDT.The flowchart of the new proposed method is described in Figure1.Figure 1
Flowchart of the classification process using EMD and EDT.


## 3. A Case Study

### 3.1. Experimental Setup and Data Acquisition

A mechanical test bed in the RCM laboratory of Mechanical Engineering College is used in this research to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in this paper. The gearbox is driven by a 4 KW three-phase asynchronous drive motor. In addition, the speed and torque sensors are used to acquire the speed and torque information; a magnetic powder brake is utilized to provide load. These components are connected by couplings, as shown in Figure2.Figure 2
The gearbox test rig.The crack fault is implemented on one teeth of gear #2. Three crack levels are introduced and the length of each level is 1 mm, 2 mm, and 5 mm, respectively. Figure3(a) shows the structure of the gearbox used in this experiment. Gear #2 is the test gear and its tooth number is 64. The tooth numbers of other three gears are 35 (#1), 18 (#3), and 81 (#4), respectively. Four accelerometers are mounted on the gearbox casing and the specific location of every accelerometer is also shown in Figure 3(a). Figure 3(b) is the photo of the fault gear used in this study.Figure 3
(a) The structure of the gearbox. (b) The fault gear used in this study.
(a)
(b)The sampling frequency of this experimental system is 20 kHz and sampling time is 6 s. Each fault mode has 60 samples. The input rotary speed of motor is 800 rpm and the loads generated by brake are 10 N·m, 15 N·m, and 20 N·m.


### 3.2. Results Analysis and Discussion

Following the procedure described in Section2, the process of gear crack level classification can be introduced as follows. First, raw vibration data are collected from the data acquisition system of the gearbox test rig. This paper chooses the vibration data acquired by accelerometer 1. Then, the vibration data is processed by EMD and a number of IMFs are obtained which range from 15 to 19. Taking one vibration signal which obtained 15 IMFs after processed by EMD as a sample, and the IMFs are shown in Figure 4.Figure 4
The decomposition result by EMD.In order to select the sensitive IMFs, the correlation coefficients and fault factors are calculated, which are shown in Table1.Table 1
The correlation coefficients and fault factor of IMFs.
Number
α
k
β
k
λ
k
IMF1
0.471
0.001
0.470
IMF2
0.494
−0.007
0.501
IMF3
0.556
0.012
0.543
IMF4
0.384
−0.012
0.396
IMF5
0.285
0.001
0.284
IMF6
0.154
0.000
0.154
IMF7
0.028
−0.004
0.032
IMF8
0.005
0.000
0.005
IMF9
0.006
0.002
0.004
IMF10
0.017
0.005
0.013
IMF11
0.011
−0.005
0.016
IMF12
0.000
0.000
0.000
IMF13
0.001
0.000
0.000
IMF14
0.000
0.000
−0.001
IMF15
−0.001
0.000
−0.001It can be seen from Table1 that the first to sixth IMFs have great correlation of the fault signal and little correlation of the normal signal. Namely, these IMFs contain the main fault information, and they are selected as the sensitive IMFs.The vibration signal of a gearbox is a mixture of many components, such as shafts and bearings, not limited to gear meshing vibration only. To validate the selected IMFs containing gear fault information, this paper analyzed the frequency spectrum of original signal and each IMF, respectively. The signal is acquired from 1 mm crack state with 800 rpm speed and 20 Nm load condition.Usually, shaft and bearing rotating frequencies are all in low frequency area. And gear meshing frequency will be a little high relatively. Figure5 is the envelope analysis of original signal. The figure shows that gear meshing frequencies are very obvious. Shafts and bearings rotating frequencies can also be seen in low frequency area. In addition, the noise pollution is very serious.Figure 5
Envelope analysis of original signal.Figure6 is the envelope analysis of IMF1. Similarly, gear meshing and shafts and bearings rotating frequencies are obvious. But the noise pollution is restrained effectively. Figure 7 is the envelope analysis of IMF2. It can be seen from the figure that gear meshing frequencies are prominent. However, shafts and bearings rotating frequencies are filtered out. Because the filtered order of EMD is from high frequency to low, so these results can ensure that the selected IMFs contain gear fault information.Figure 6
Envelope analysis of IMF1.Figure 7
Envelope analysis of IMF2.Then, the feature parameter vectors can be calculated. This paper selects energy of IMF as feature parameter. In addition, the gear has 4 crack levels and 30 test samples are chosen for each crack level. So, the energy set,Empq, is a 4-by-6-by-30 matrix. The mean values of feature vectors of all the samples for the same class are used as the trained sample. Therefore, the euclidean distances between test samples and four classess trained samples can be obtained. Table 2 shows the distance values between normal test samples and the trained samples of each level when the load is 10 N·m. It can be seen from Table 2 that distance values between test samples and the trained samples of normal state are the minimum, and the accuracy rate of the classification result is about 96.67%.Table 2
The distance values when normal test samples are inputted and the load is 10 N·m.
Number
Normal
1 mm crack
2 mm crack
5 mm crack
1
2.38
E
+
03
1.30
E
+
04
4.94
E
+
03
1.12
E
+
04
2
2.14
E
+
03
1.32
E
+
04
5.41
E
+
03
1.15
E
+
04
3
1.81
E
+
03
1.39
E
+
04
7.28
E
+
03
1.25
E
+
04
4
1.98
E
+
03
1.20
E
+
04
6.09
E
+
03
1.05
E
+
04
5
1.79
E
+
03
1.39
E
+
04
7.98
E
+
03
1.26
E
+
04
6
2.06
E
+
03
1.38
E
+
04
6.28
E
+
03
1.23
E
+
04
7
2.64
E
+
03
1.38
E
+
04
8.10
E
+
03
1.25
E
+
04
8
1.94
E
+
03
1.38
E
+
04
6.21
E
+
03
1.22
E
+
04
9
2.43
E
+
03
1.33
E
+
04
6.92
E
+
03
1.18
E
+
04
10
2.65
E
+
03
1.42
E
+
04
6.73
E
+
03
1.25
E
+
04
11
1.89
E
+
03
1.34
E
+
04
5.37
E
+
03
1.16
E
+
04
12
1.66
E
+
03
1.45
E
+
04
7.72
E
+
03
1.30
E
+
04
13
1.90
E
+
03
1.34
E
+
04
6.19
E
+
03
1.17
E
+
04
14
3.40
E
+
03
1.49
E
+
04
8.77
E
+
03
1.35
E
+
04
15
1.33
E
+
03
1.40
E
+
04
7.71
E
+
03
1.25
E
+
04
16
1.64
E
+
03
1.38
E
+
04
7.10
E
+
03
1.22
E
+
04
17
2.29
E
+
03
1.39
E
+
04
5.83
E
+
03
1.21
E
+
04
18
2.43
E
+
03
1.40
E
+
04
6.34
E
+
03
1.23
E
+
04
19
1.98
E
+
03
1.33
E
+
04
6.45
E
+
03
1.18
E
+
04
20
1.88
E
+
03
1.45
E
+
04
6.89
E
+
03
1.28
E
+
04
21
2.54
E
+
03
1.45
E
+
04
6.92
E
+
03
1.29
E
+
04
22
3.99
E
+
03
1.53
E
+
04
8.91
E
+
03
1.40
E
+
04
23
4.40
E
+
03
1.37
E
+
04
4.16
E
+
03
1.16
E
+
04
24
2.97
E
+
03
1.43
E
+
04
5.99
E
+
03
1.25
E
+
04
25
3.23
E
+
03
1.42
E
+
04
6.73
E
+
03
1.25
E
+
04
26
4.78
E
+
03
1.42
E
+
04
5.33
E
+
03
1.22
E
+
04
27
3.91
E
+
03
1.37
E
+
04
5.24
E
+
03
1.18
E
+
04
28
3.16
E
+
03
1.41
E
+
04
6.63
E
+
03
1.23
E
+
04
29
4.66
E
+
03
1.48
E
+
04
6.45
E
+
03
1.31
E
+
04
30
3.39
E
+
03
1.37
E
+
04
5.40
E
+
03
1.17
E
+
04To show the distance values more directly and save space, the results are all shown by figures. When the load is 10 N·m, the results can be depicted as in Figures8, 9, 10, and 11. It can be seen from the figures that the accuracy rate of the classification results using the proposed method is approximately 100%.Figure 8
The classification result when normal test samples are inputted.Figure 9
The classification result when 1 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 10
The classification result when 2 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 11
The classification result when 5 mm crack test samples areinputted.To validate the effectiveness of EMD, the energy of original signal that is not processed by EMD is extracted and the classification results are shown as in Figures12, 13, 14, and 15. It can be seen that for the case that the energy of original signal is extracted without EMD the accuracy rate is about 80% and the classification results are unsatisfactory. Therefore, the process of EMD is effective by this comparing study.Figure 12
The classification result of original signal when normal test samples are inputted.Figure 13
The classification result of original signal when 1 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 14
The classification result of original signal when 2 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 15
The classification result of original signal when 5 mm crack test samples are inputted.In order to validate the proposed method for which sensitive IMFs are selected, energy of first to third IMFs is extracted and the final classification results are shown as in Figures16, 17, 18, and 19. The classification results show the effectiveness of the proposed method for selecting the sensitive IMFs. If all IMFs are selected, the computing velocity will be slow. And if few IMFs are selected, for the case of 3 IMFs, the classification results will be not very accurate.Figure 16
The classification result using first to third IMFs when normal test samples are inputted.Figure 17
The classification result using first to third IMFs when 1 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 18
The classification result using first to third IMFs when 2 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 19
The classification result using first to third IMFs when 5 mm crack test samples are inputted.All the samples above are under the load of 10 N·m; for the purpose of checking the adaptability to different conditions of the method, the load of 15 N·m and 20 N·m is also considered and the classification results are shown as in Figures20, 21, 22, and 23 and Figures 24, 25, 26, and 27, respectively. It can be seen that the method proposed in this paper also has good performance. The accuracy rates are nearly 100% for the two cases.Figure 20
The classification result of 15 N·m load when normal test samples are inputted.Figure 21
The classification result of 15 N·m load when 1 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 22
The classification result of 15 N·m load when 2 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 23
The classification result of 15 N·m load when 2 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 24
The classification result of 20 N·m load when normal test samples are inputted.Figure 25
The classification result of 20 N·m load when 1 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 26
The classification result of 20 N·m load when 2 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 27
The classification result of 20 N·m load when 5 mm crack test samples are inputted.It can be obtained from above analysis that the gear crack level classification method is effective to identify different crack levels no matter whether the fault is in early stage (1 mm) or sever stage (5 mm). In addition, EMD and the method of selecting sensitive IMFs are crucial during process of the original signal.


## 3.1. Experimental Setup and Data Acquisition

A mechanical test bed in the RCM laboratory of Mechanical Engineering College is used in this research to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in this paper. The gearbox is driven by a 4 KW three-phase asynchronous drive motor. In addition, the speed and torque sensors are used to acquire the speed and torque information; a magnetic powder brake is utilized to provide load. These components are connected by couplings, as shown in Figure2.Figure 2
The gearbox test rig.The crack fault is implemented on one teeth of gear #2. Three crack levels are introduced and the length of each level is 1 mm, 2 mm, and 5 mm, respectively. Figure3(a) shows the structure of the gearbox used in this experiment. Gear #2 is the test gear and its tooth number is 64. The tooth numbers of other three gears are 35 (#1), 18 (#3), and 81 (#4), respectively. Four accelerometers are mounted on the gearbox casing and the specific location of every accelerometer is also shown in Figure 3(a). Figure 3(b) is the photo of the fault gear used in this study.Figure 3
(a) The structure of the gearbox. (b) The fault gear used in this study.
(a)
(b)The sampling frequency of this experimental system is 20 kHz and sampling time is 6 s. Each fault mode has 60 samples. The input rotary speed of motor is 800 rpm and the loads generated by brake are 10 N·m, 15 N·m, and 20 N·m.


## 3.2. Results Analysis and Discussion

Following the procedure described in Section2, the process of gear crack level classification can be introduced as follows. First, raw vibration data are collected from the data acquisition system of the gearbox test rig. This paper chooses the vibration data acquired by accelerometer 1. Then, the vibration data is processed by EMD and a number of IMFs are obtained which range from 15 to 19. Taking one vibration signal which obtained 15 IMFs after processed by EMD as a sample, and the IMFs are shown in Figure 4.Figure 4
The decomposition result by EMD.In order to select the sensitive IMFs, the correlation coefficients and fault factors are calculated, which are shown in Table1.Table 1
The correlation coefficients and fault factor of IMFs.
Number
α
k
β
k
λ
k
IMF1
0.471
0.001
0.470
IMF2
0.494
−0.007
0.501
IMF3
0.556
0.012
0.543
IMF4
0.384
−0.012
0.396
IMF5
0.285
0.001
0.284
IMF6
0.154
0.000
0.154
IMF7
0.028
−0.004
0.032
IMF8
0.005
0.000
0.005
IMF9
0.006
0.002
0.004
IMF10
0.017
0.005
0.013
IMF11
0.011
−0.005
0.016
IMF12
0.000
0.000
0.000
IMF13
0.001
0.000
0.000
IMF14
0.000
0.000
−0.001
IMF15
−0.001
0.000
−0.001It can be seen from Table1 that the first to sixth IMFs have great correlation of the fault signal and little correlation of the normal signal. Namely, these IMFs contain the main fault information, and they are selected as the sensitive IMFs.The vibration signal of a gearbox is a mixture of many components, such as shafts and bearings, not limited to gear meshing vibration only. To validate the selected IMFs containing gear fault information, this paper analyzed the frequency spectrum of original signal and each IMF, respectively. The signal is acquired from 1 mm crack state with 800 rpm speed and 20 Nm load condition.Usually, shaft and bearing rotating frequencies are all in low frequency area. And gear meshing frequency will be a little high relatively. Figure5 is the envelope analysis of original signal. The figure shows that gear meshing frequencies are very obvious. Shafts and bearings rotating frequencies can also be seen in low frequency area. In addition, the noise pollution is very serious.Figure 5
Envelope analysis of original signal.Figure6 is the envelope analysis of IMF1. Similarly, gear meshing and shafts and bearings rotating frequencies are obvious. But the noise pollution is restrained effectively. Figure 7 is the envelope analysis of IMF2. It can be seen from the figure that gear meshing frequencies are prominent. However, shafts and bearings rotating frequencies are filtered out. Because the filtered order of EMD is from high frequency to low, so these results can ensure that the selected IMFs contain gear fault information.Figure 6
Envelope analysis of IMF1.Figure 7
Envelope analysis of IMF2.Then, the feature parameter vectors can be calculated. This paper selects energy of IMF as feature parameter. In addition, the gear has 4 crack levels and 30 test samples are chosen for each crack level. So, the energy set,Empq, is a 4-by-6-by-30 matrix. The mean values of feature vectors of all the samples for the same class are used as the trained sample. Therefore, the euclidean distances between test samples and four classess trained samples can be obtained. Table 2 shows the distance values between normal test samples and the trained samples of each level when the load is 10 N·m. It can be seen from Table 2 that distance values between test samples and the trained samples of normal state are the minimum, and the accuracy rate of the classification result is about 96.67%.Table 2
The distance values when normal test samples are inputted and the load is 10 N·m.
Number
Normal
1 mm crack
2 mm crack
5 mm crack
1
2.38
E
+
03
1.30
E
+
04
4.94
E
+
03
1.12
E
+
04
2
2.14
E
+
03
1.32
E
+
04
5.41
E
+
03
1.15
E
+
04
3
1.81
E
+
03
1.39
E
+
04
7.28
E
+
03
1.25
E
+
04
4
1.98
E
+
03
1.20
E
+
04
6.09
E
+
03
1.05
E
+
04
5
1.79
E
+
03
1.39
E
+
04
7.98
E
+
03
1.26
E
+
04
6
2.06
E
+
03
1.38
E
+
04
6.28
E
+
03
1.23
E
+
04
7
2.64
E
+
03
1.38
E
+
04
8.10
E
+
03
1.25
E
+
04
8
1.94
E
+
03
1.38
E
+
04
6.21
E
+
03
1.22
E
+
04
9
2.43
E
+
03
1.33
E
+
04
6.92
E
+
03
1.18
E
+
04
10
2.65
E
+
03
1.42
E
+
04
6.73
E
+
03
1.25
E
+
04
11
1.89
E
+
03
1.34
E
+
04
5.37
E
+
03
1.16
E
+
04
12
1.66
E
+
03
1.45
E
+
04
7.72
E
+
03
1.30
E
+
04
13
1.90
E
+
03
1.34
E
+
04
6.19
E
+
03
1.17
E
+
04
14
3.40
E
+
03
1.49
E
+
04
8.77
E
+
03
1.35
E
+
04
15
1.33
E
+
03
1.40
E
+
04
7.71
E
+
03
1.25
E
+
04
16
1.64
E
+
03
1.38
E
+
04
7.10
E
+
03
1.22
E
+
04
17
2.29
E
+
03
1.39
E
+
04
5.83
E
+
03
1.21
E
+
04
18
2.43
E
+
03
1.40
E
+
04
6.34
E
+
03
1.23
E
+
04
19
1.98
E
+
03
1.33
E
+
04
6.45
E
+
03
1.18
E
+
04
20
1.88
E
+
03
1.45
E
+
04
6.89
E
+
03
1.28
E
+
04
21
2.54
E
+
03
1.45
E
+
04
6.92
E
+
03
1.29
E
+
04
22
3.99
E
+
03
1.53
E
+
04
8.91
E
+
03
1.40
E
+
04
23
4.40
E
+
03
1.37
E
+
04
4.16
E
+
03
1.16
E
+
04
24
2.97
E
+
03
1.43
E
+
04
5.99
E
+
03
1.25
E
+
04
25
3.23
E
+
03
1.42
E
+
04
6.73
E
+
03
1.25
E
+
04
26
4.78
E
+
03
1.42
E
+
04
5.33
E
+
03
1.22
E
+
04
27
3.91
E
+
03
1.37
E
+
04
5.24
E
+
03
1.18
E
+
04
28
3.16
E
+
03
1.41
E
+
04
6.63
E
+
03
1.23
E
+
04
29
4.66
E
+
03
1.48
E
+
04
6.45
E
+
03
1.31
E
+
04
30
3.39
E
+
03
1.37
E
+
04
5.40
E
+
03
1.17
E
+
04To show the distance values more directly and save space, the results are all shown by figures. When the load is 10 N·m, the results can be depicted as in Figures8, 9, 10, and 11. It can be seen from the figures that the accuracy rate of the classification results using the proposed method is approximately 100%.Figure 8
The classification result when normal test samples are inputted.Figure 9
The classification result when 1 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 10
The classification result when 2 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 11
The classification result when 5 mm crack test samples areinputted.To validate the effectiveness of EMD, the energy of original signal that is not processed by EMD is extracted and the classification results are shown as in Figures12, 13, 14, and 15. It can be seen that for the case that the energy of original signal is extracted without EMD the accuracy rate is about 80% and the classification results are unsatisfactory. Therefore, the process of EMD is effective by this comparing study.Figure 12
The classification result of original signal when normal test samples are inputted.Figure 13
The classification result of original signal when 1 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 14
The classification result of original signal when 2 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 15
The classification result of original signal when 5 mm crack test samples are inputted.In order to validate the proposed method for which sensitive IMFs are selected, energy of first to third IMFs is extracted and the final classification results are shown as in Figures16, 17, 18, and 19. The classification results show the effectiveness of the proposed method for selecting the sensitive IMFs. If all IMFs are selected, the computing velocity will be slow. And if few IMFs are selected, for the case of 3 IMFs, the classification results will be not very accurate.Figure 16
The classification result using first to third IMFs when normal test samples are inputted.Figure 17
The classification result using first to third IMFs when 1 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 18
The classification result using first to third IMFs when 2 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 19
The classification result using first to third IMFs when 5 mm crack test samples are inputted.All the samples above are under the load of 10 N·m; for the purpose of checking the adaptability to different conditions of the method, the load of 15 N·m and 20 N·m is also considered and the classification results are shown as in Figures20, 21, 22, and 23 and Figures 24, 25, 26, and 27, respectively. It can be seen that the method proposed in this paper also has good performance. The accuracy rates are nearly 100% for the two cases.Figure 20
The classification result of 15 N·m load when normal test samples are inputted.Figure 21
The classification result of 15 N·m load when 1 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 22
The classification result of 15 N·m load when 2 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 23
The classification result of 15 N·m load when 2 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 24
The classification result of 20 N·m load when normal test samples are inputted.Figure 25
The classification result of 20 N·m load when 1 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 26
The classification result of 20 N·m load when 2 mm crack test samples are inputted.Figure 27
The classification result of 20 N·m load when 5 mm crack test samples are inputted.It can be obtained from above analysis that the gear crack level classification method is effective to identify different crack levels no matter whether the fault is in early stage (1 mm) or sever stage (5 mm). In addition, EMD and the method of selecting sensitive IMFs are crucial during process of the original signal.


## 4. Conclusion

In this paper, a new gear crack level classification method based on empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and Euclidean distance technique (EDT) is proposed. The approach was tested and validated successfully using a test rig implanted crack fault experiment case. The results show the proposed method obtains high accuracy rate in classifying different crack levels and adapts to different conditions. Additionly, it is found through comparison that EMD and the method of selecting sensitive IMFs are crucial during process of the original signal.



---

*Source: 137274-2015-05-19.xml*