# Formulation of Zero-Trans Crystalized Fats Produced from Palm Stearin and High Oleic Safflower Oil Blends

Authors: Nydia E. Buitimea-Cantúa; María Guadalupe Salazar-García; Reyna Luz Vidal-Quintanar; Sergio O. Serna-Saldívar; Refugio Ortega-Ramirez; Génesis Vidal Buitimea-Cantúa
Journal: Journal of Food Quality
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

High intake oftrans fat is associated with several chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. Fat blends, produced by direct blending process of palm stearin (PS) with high oleic safflower oil (HOSO) in different concentrations, were investigated. The effects of the PS addition (50, 70, or 90%) and the rate of agitation (RA) (1000, 2000, or 3000 rpm) on physical properties, fatty acid profile (FAP),transfatty acids (TFA), crystal structure, and consistency were researched. The blend containing 50% of each sort of oil (50% PS/50% HOSO) showed that melting point and features were similar to the control shortening. The saturated fatty acids (SFA) were higher followed by monounsaturated (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). Significant differences in the content of palmitic and oleic acids among blends were observed. The 50% PS/50% HOSO blend contained higher oleic acid (42.9%) whereas the 90% PS/10% HOSO was higher in palmitic acid (56.9%). The blending of PS/HOSO promoted the β crystal polymorphic forms. The direct blending process of equal amounts of PS and HOSO was an adequate strategy to formulate a new zero-trans crystallized vegetable fats with characteristics similar to commercial counterparts with well-balanced fats rich in both omega 3 and omega 6 fatty acids.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Bakery shortenings prepared by hydrogenation process of vegetable oils contain levels between 20 and 40% oftrans fatty acids (TFA) [1]. TFA have negative health implications especially in terms of the ratio of high-density to low-density lipoproteins, which is correlated with risk of cardiovascular diseases [2]. Several published reports have indicated that TFA have also adverse effects on serum cholesterol, triglyceride levels, and coronary heart diseases [3, 4]. The harmful effects of TFA on the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol are reported to be twice compared to saturated FA [5]. Kromhout et al. [6] concluded that a gram-for-gram basis TFA has been associated with an increase of 15 times of greater incidence of coronary heart diseases than SFA. TFA have also been related with risk of breast and colon cancer, diabetes, obesity, and allergies [2].The World Health Organization (WHO) and Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) recommend that the daily intake of TFA should not exceed 4% in foods and consequently, some countries impose maximum legal limits of these fatty acids [7]. Recently, the FDA mandated that partially hydrogenated oils, the primary dietary source oftrans fats in processed foods, be removed from products entirely by 2018 [8]. Therefore, efforts have been made to replace hydrogenated oils by other fat sources with lower or zero-trans fats [9] without sacrificing the functional properties [10].Chemical interesterification (CI), enzyme interesterification (EI), and direct blending (high-melting fraction with vegetable oils) are viable alternatives to the hydrogenation process. These processes are aimed to impart the desired functionality without generating TFA [10–12]. Direct blending has several advantages compared to either CI or EI [13, 14], the most relevant being that no chemical processes are involved, and is consistent with the consumer trend toward consumption of natural products [13]. Additionally, the knowledgeable selection of fat blends and the proper crystallization process is critical for the production of plastic shortenings without hydrogenation [14].PS is an excellent substitute for animal fats for the production of shortenings without cholesterol [15] mainly because it is natural and cheaper. This high-melting fraction is obtained after fractionation of palm oil which is the second most produced oil worldwide. However, because of its high-melting profile ranging from 44 to 56°C, PS cannot be used directly for production of shortening as it causes low plasticity to the products [16]. Thus, it might be appropriately blended with liquid oils in order to modify the overall physical characteristics of the mixture to enhance functionality and the quality required for trans-free shortening preparation [14, 17, 18]. Furthermore, PS has the ability of promoting the polymorphic form of fat crystal β′, which is desirable in shortenings. This particular polymorphic form has a large surface area, fine arrangement (packing of small crystals), and greater oil-holding capacity [14, 19].Moreover, several studies have reported the feasibility of formulating zero-or low-transshortenings using PS blended with other oils that after processing generate crystallized fats with similar organoleptic and functional properties compared to commercial shortenings [10, 14, 17, 18]. Mayamol et al. [14] blended PS and rice bran oil (50 : 50) to preparetrans-free bakery shortenings whereas other investigators [12, 20, 21] devised comparable bakery shortenings with similar blends without significantly affecting the physicochemical and textural properties of products. The vegetable oils from sunflower, palm, rapeseed, camellia, canola, rice bran, sesame, and soybean have been previously utilized in formulation of zero-or low-transcrystallized fats. However, sunflower oil, like other polyunsaturated oils, is unstable and its use as cooking oil limited because of its high degree of unsaturation or iodine value (linoleic acid content greater than 75%) which makes it more prone to both oxidative and thermal deteriorations [22].Various oils with different fatty acid profiles have been developed by plant breeding, including low-linolenic soybean, high oleic sunflower, low-linolenic canola, high oleic canola, and high oleic safflower [23, 24]. All these modified natural oils have improved frying stability compared to unmodified counterparts [25].Carthamus tinctorius seeds are rich in edible oil (high oleic safflower oil), with similar content to olive. This oil is typically composed of oleic (74%), linoleic (16–25%), and linolenic (1–6%) acids [26]. This is relevant because oleic acid consumption is considered cardioprotective according to studies of the Mediterranean diet rich in olive oil [27]. HOSO is used for its high resistance to oxidation and heat degradation enabling its use in many baking applications including high temperature frying. Thetrans free HOSO can diminish saturated fat levels, which is ideal in order to generate clean food labels to food manufacturers and for health-conscious consumers [26, 28].When developing a new shortening, it is essential to optimize the physicochemical properties with an acceptable level of oxidative stability. During storage, the lipid oxidation is a major cause of deterioration, leading to the development of rancid off-odors and flavors [29]. Hence, to obtain a healthy product, oxidative stability is critical in practical use of shortenings. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop zero-trans crystalized fat formulations produced from blending palm stearin and high oleic safflower oil without sacrificing functional properties and acceptability in terms of oxidative stability.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

The palm stearin (PS) was purchased from RBD (Industrializadora Oleofinos SA de CV) whereas the high oleic safflower oil from OLEICO (Coral Internacional, SA de CV). The hydrogenated commercial shortening was obtained from SARITA (Proteinas y Oleicos SA de CV). Standards of FAME, linoleic acid methyl ester isomer mix, and linolenic acid methyl ester isomer mix were purchased from Sigma, St. Louis, MO. All other chemicals used were analytical grade and purchased from JT Baker Deventer, Netherlands.


### 2.2. Process of Production of Zero-Trans Fat

The PS was melted in a temperature controlled water bath set at 60°C. The melted PS and HOSO were blended in a mixer (vertical Robot Coupe PVM, model RS110V) in mass ratios (PS/HOSO) of 50 : 50, 70 : 30, or 90 : 10. Resulting blends were mixed for 10 min at 1000, 2000, or 3000 rpm at a constant temperature of 70°C. The homogeneous fat blend was poured in 500 mL closed plastic containers and tempered and equilibrated at 30 ± 1°C for 5 d according to the method previously described by Mayamol et al. [14] with slight modifications. The factors involved in this new modification were the sources of fat (palm stearin and high oleic safflower oil) and speed of agitation.


#### 2.2.1. Physical Analyses

The different blends of PS/HOSO were analyzed in terms of color (Lovibond red) (method, Cc 13e-92), refractive index (method Cc 7-25), capillary melting point (method Cc-1-25), relative density (method Cc 10a-25), acidity (method Ca 5a-40), peroxide value (method Cd 8-53), moisture and volatile matter (method Ca 2d-25), and iodine value (method Cd 1c- 85) according to official AOCS [30] procedures.


#### 2.2.2. Fatty Acid Profile

The fatty acid profile (FAP) of blends (PS/HOSO) was determined by gas chromatography as described by Medina-Juárez et al. [31]. The identification and quantification of the methyl esters were determined by the method Ce 1-62 of the AOCS [30]. The gas chromatograph (VARIAN 3400, Mexico City, Mexico) was equipped with a flame-ionization detector (FID) and an integrator (Model 1020, Perkin Elmer, Mexico City, Mexico). A capillary column with 100% biscyanopropyl polysiloxane as the stationary phase SP-2560 (100 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.2 μm; Supelco, Inc., Bellefonte, PA 16823-0048 USA) was used. The oven temperature was set at 140–210°C for 4°C/min, followed by 210–215°C for 1°C/min, and finally 215–220°C for 0.5°C/min. Nitrogen was used as carrier gas with a flow of 20 cm/s. The temperature of the injector and detector was 250°C. The identification and quantification of the peaks were performed by comparison with the retention times and areas of the corresponding standards (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO).Trans isomers were identified from the linoleic and linolenic acids methyl ester isomer mixes. Results were expressed as weight percentage (wt%) of fat.


#### 2.2.3. Polymorphism

The polymorphic forms of fat in the blends were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) according to the methodology described by Mayamol et al. [10], using a Broker Model D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer emitting Cu α radiation. Data were collected at room temperature from 5 to 45 2θ. X-ray data were processed by a computer programmed to calculate absorption intensity-background, intensity, and peak width in degrees for each crystalline form. The relative contents of α, β, and β′ crystals were acquired. The β form was calculated from the intensity of the short spacing at 4.6, 3.8, and 3.7 Å whereas the β′ polymorph was calculated from the intensities of the short spacing of 3.8 and 4.2 Å.


#### 2.2.4. Consistency

The consistency of the crystallized blends was tested with a cone penetrometer (KOEHLER Model Instrument Company INC) in samples tempered at three different temperatures (12°C, 20°C, or 30°C) according to method Cc 16-60 AOCS [30]. The crystallized fats were tempered in bioclimatic chambers set at 12, 20, or 30°C.


### 2.3. Statistical Analysis

A completely randomized experiment was performed. PS addition (50, 70, or 90%) and the rate of agitation (RA) (1000, 2000, or 3000 rpm) were the factors considered. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and comparison of means by Tukey (significance level of 95%) were performed. Data was reported as means and standard deviations. Analyses were performed using the JMP 5.0.1 statistics software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).


## 2.1. Materials

The palm stearin (PS) was purchased from RBD (Industrializadora Oleofinos SA de CV) whereas the high oleic safflower oil from OLEICO (Coral Internacional, SA de CV). The hydrogenated commercial shortening was obtained from SARITA (Proteinas y Oleicos SA de CV). Standards of FAME, linoleic acid methyl ester isomer mix, and linolenic acid methyl ester isomer mix were purchased from Sigma, St. Louis, MO. All other chemicals used were analytical grade and purchased from JT Baker Deventer, Netherlands.


## 2.2. Process of Production of Zero-Trans Fat

The PS was melted in a temperature controlled water bath set at 60°C. The melted PS and HOSO were blended in a mixer (vertical Robot Coupe PVM, model RS110V) in mass ratios (PS/HOSO) of 50 : 50, 70 : 30, or 90 : 10. Resulting blends were mixed for 10 min at 1000, 2000, or 3000 rpm at a constant temperature of 70°C. The homogeneous fat blend was poured in 500 mL closed plastic containers and tempered and equilibrated at 30 ± 1°C for 5 d according to the method previously described by Mayamol et al. [14] with slight modifications. The factors involved in this new modification were the sources of fat (palm stearin and high oleic safflower oil) and speed of agitation.


### 2.2.1. Physical Analyses

The different blends of PS/HOSO were analyzed in terms of color (Lovibond red) (method, Cc 13e-92), refractive index (method Cc 7-25), capillary melting point (method Cc-1-25), relative density (method Cc 10a-25), acidity (method Ca 5a-40), peroxide value (method Cd 8-53), moisture and volatile matter (method Ca 2d-25), and iodine value (method Cd 1c- 85) according to official AOCS [30] procedures.


### 2.2.2. Fatty Acid Profile

The fatty acid profile (FAP) of blends (PS/HOSO) was determined by gas chromatography as described by Medina-Juárez et al. [31]. The identification and quantification of the methyl esters were determined by the method Ce 1-62 of the AOCS [30]. The gas chromatograph (VARIAN 3400, Mexico City, Mexico) was equipped with a flame-ionization detector (FID) and an integrator (Model 1020, Perkin Elmer, Mexico City, Mexico). A capillary column with 100% biscyanopropyl polysiloxane as the stationary phase SP-2560 (100 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.2 μm; Supelco, Inc., Bellefonte, PA 16823-0048 USA) was used. The oven temperature was set at 140–210°C for 4°C/min, followed by 210–215°C for 1°C/min, and finally 215–220°C for 0.5°C/min. Nitrogen was used as carrier gas with a flow of 20 cm/s. The temperature of the injector and detector was 250°C. The identification and quantification of the peaks were performed by comparison with the retention times and areas of the corresponding standards (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO).Trans isomers were identified from the linoleic and linolenic acids methyl ester isomer mixes. Results were expressed as weight percentage (wt%) of fat.


### 2.2.3. Polymorphism

The polymorphic forms of fat in the blends were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) according to the methodology described by Mayamol et al. [10], using a Broker Model D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer emitting Cu α radiation. Data were collected at room temperature from 5 to 45 2θ. X-ray data were processed by a computer programmed to calculate absorption intensity-background, intensity, and peak width in degrees for each crystalline form. The relative contents of α, β, and β′ crystals were acquired. The β form was calculated from the intensity of the short spacing at 4.6, 3.8, and 3.7 Å whereas the β′ polymorph was calculated from the intensities of the short spacing of 3.8 and 4.2 Å.


### 2.2.4. Consistency

The consistency of the crystallized blends was tested with a cone penetrometer (KOEHLER Model Instrument Company INC) in samples tempered at three different temperatures (12°C, 20°C, or 30°C) according to method Cc 16-60 AOCS [30]. The crystallized fats were tempered in bioclimatic chambers set at 12, 20, or 30°C.


## 2.2.1. Physical Analyses

The different blends of PS/HOSO were analyzed in terms of color (Lovibond red) (method, Cc 13e-92), refractive index (method Cc 7-25), capillary melting point (method Cc-1-25), relative density (method Cc 10a-25), acidity (method Ca 5a-40), peroxide value (method Cd 8-53), moisture and volatile matter (method Ca 2d-25), and iodine value (method Cd 1c- 85) according to official AOCS [30] procedures.


## 2.2.2. Fatty Acid Profile

The fatty acid profile (FAP) of blends (PS/HOSO) was determined by gas chromatography as described by Medina-Juárez et al. [31]. The identification and quantification of the methyl esters were determined by the method Ce 1-62 of the AOCS [30]. The gas chromatograph (VARIAN 3400, Mexico City, Mexico) was equipped with a flame-ionization detector (FID) and an integrator (Model 1020, Perkin Elmer, Mexico City, Mexico). A capillary column with 100% biscyanopropyl polysiloxane as the stationary phase SP-2560 (100 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.2 μm; Supelco, Inc., Bellefonte, PA 16823-0048 USA) was used. The oven temperature was set at 140–210°C for 4°C/min, followed by 210–215°C for 1°C/min, and finally 215–220°C for 0.5°C/min. Nitrogen was used as carrier gas with a flow of 20 cm/s. The temperature of the injector and detector was 250°C. The identification and quantification of the peaks were performed by comparison with the retention times and areas of the corresponding standards (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO).Trans isomers were identified from the linoleic and linolenic acids methyl ester isomer mixes. Results were expressed as weight percentage (wt%) of fat.


## 2.2.3. Polymorphism

The polymorphic forms of fat in the blends were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) according to the methodology described by Mayamol et al. [10], using a Broker Model D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer emitting Cu α radiation. Data were collected at room temperature from 5 to 45 2θ. X-ray data were processed by a computer programmed to calculate absorption intensity-background, intensity, and peak width in degrees for each crystalline form. The relative contents of α, β, and β′ crystals were acquired. The β form was calculated from the intensity of the short spacing at 4.6, 3.8, and 3.7 Å whereas the β′ polymorph was calculated from the intensities of the short spacing of 3.8 and 4.2 Å.


## 2.2.4. Consistency

The consistency of the crystallized blends was tested with a cone penetrometer (KOEHLER Model Instrument Company INC) in samples tempered at three different temperatures (12°C, 20°C, or 30°C) according to method Cc 16-60 AOCS [30]. The crystallized fats were tempered in bioclimatic chambers set at 12, 20, or 30°C.


## 2.3. Statistical Analysis

A completely randomized experiment was performed. PS addition (50, 70, or 90%) and the rate of agitation (RA) (1000, 2000, or 3000 rpm) were the factors considered. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and comparison of means by Tukey (significance level of 95%) were performed. Data was reported as means and standard deviations. Analyses were performed using the JMP 5.0.1 statistics software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Physicals Properties

The results of the color, refraction index, melting point, density, acidity, moisture, and peroxide and iodine values of palm stearin, high oleic safflower oil, PS/HOSO crystallized blends mixed at different agitation rates, and HCS are depicted in Tables1 and 2. As expected, the various physical properties were significantly affected (p<0.05) by the different ratios of PS and HOSO. Hydrogenated fats should have a red color value of 1.5 [32]. Among the experimental blends, the color of the 90% PS/10% HOSO mix had higher reddish (3.0) scores (p<0.05) compared to the control HCS (2.0). The observed differences in color can be attributed to PS addition, HOSO addition, and fat type (vegetable or animal sources). The PS had a higher red color score of 3.5. This could be attributed to the presence of tocopherols and β-carotenes that are responsible for imparting orange, reddish, and yellow colorations [14, 33]. Furthermore, the HOSO contained high concentrations of total tocopherols (178 ppm) which contained 85.82%  α-tocopherol [28].Table 1
Physical properties, fatty acid compositions, and consistencies of palm stearin and high oleic saffloweroil1.
Characteristics
Palm stearin
High oleic safflower oil
Colour (Lovibond red)
3.50
1.00
Refractive index (50/25°C)
1.45
1.463
Melting point (°C)
52.00
—
Relative density (60/25°C; g/ml)
0.8728
0.919
Acidity (Oleic%)
0.0375
0.21
Peroxides (Meq O2/Kg)
0.20
0.50
Moisture and volatile matter (%)
0.22
0.05
Iodine value (gr. I2/100 gr)
32.23
90.00
Fatty acids composition (%)†
Myristic (14:0)
1.83
N
D
∗
Palmitic (16:0)
55.33
6.09
Palmitoleic (16:1 n-7)
0.83
ND
Stearic (18:0)
9.72
2.64
Oleic (18:1 n-9)
22.84
77.50
Linoleic (18:2 n-6)
8.75
12.01
Linolenic (18:3 n-3)
0.66
0.25
Fatty acidstrans
N
D
∗
N
D
∗
Polymorphic forms
β
≈
β
′
β
Consistency (mm/10 g) to:
12°C
70.00
—
20°C
117.00
—
30°C
209.00
—
V
a
l
u
e
s
1 are the mean of three replicates; weight† percentage; ND∗: not detectable.Table 2
Physical properties of zero-trans crystallized fats produced from palm stearin-high oleic safflower oil blends compared to hydrogenated commercial shortening1,2.
Concentration PS/HOSO3 (%)
Rate of agitation (rpm)
Color (red)
RI4
Melting point (°C)
Density (g/mL)
Acidity (Oleic %)
Peroxides (Meq O2/Kg)
Moisture (°C)
Iodine value (gr. I2/100 gr)
50 : 50
1000
2.7
c
1.4610a
46c
0.908d
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
52.45a
2000
2.7
c
1.4610a
46c
0.909c
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
52.45a
3000
2.7
c
1.4610a
46c
0.908d
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
52.45a
70 : 30
1000
2.9
b
1.4595b
48b
0.931b
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
46.45b
2000
2.9
b
1.4595b
48b
0.932a
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
46.45b
3000
2.9
b
1.4595b
48b
0.931b
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
46.45b
90 : 10
1000
3.0
a
1.4580d
50a
0.877e
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
34.03d
2000
3.0
a
1.4580d
50a
0.877e
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
34.03d
3000
3.0
a
1.4580d
50a
0.877e
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
34.03d
Hydrogenated commercialshortening
2.0
d
1.4590c
45d
0.810f
0.015a
0.55b
0.4b
43.00c
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
1 letter within each column indicates highly significant differences (p<0.05). Values2 are the mean of three replicates; PS/HOSO3 = palm stearin-high oleic safflower oil blends; RI4 = refractive index (50/25°C).Various blends containing PS and vegetable oils were screened based on iodine value (IV) and melting point [10, 17]. IV is an important parameter used in the hydrogenation industry because its value is closely related to melting point and oxidative stability. Shortenings with low-iodine value have lower melting points and are less susceptible to oxidation or are more stable [17]. The IV of HOSO was 90 (Table 1). After blending with the hard fraction of the palm oil, there was a decrease in IV. As expected, the lowest value was observed in the blend containing 90% palm stearin. There was a gradual increase in the melting point from 46°C to 50°C when the PS concentration in the PS/HOSO blends increased (Table 2). Hydrogenated fats should have a melting point between 35°C and 45°C [26] and the PS showed a melting point of 52°C (Table 1). The melting point of the blends containing PS of 90% was higher compared to the 50% blend (Table 2). There were no significant differences (p>0.05) in the acidity, peroxide value, and moisture of the blends. The PS did not affect significantly (p>0.05) the physical properties of the experimental blends.


### 3.2. Fatty Acids Profile

The fatty acid profiles of PS/HOSO blends (50 : 50, 70 : 30, and 90 : 10) processed at agitation rates of 3000 rpm and HCS are presented in Table3. As expected, the FAP was significantly affected (p<0.05) by addition of different ratios of PS and HOSO. The PS presented higher content of palmitic and oleic acids (49.81% and 20.56%, resp.) whereas the HOSO contained comparatively higher levels of oleic and linoleic acids (77.50% and 12.01%, resp.) (Table 1). The FAP of the PS/HOSO blends indicated that the components in order of abundance were palmitic (36.8–56.9%), oleic (27.1–42.9%), linoleic (6.1–12.3%), stearic (4.4–4.9%), and palmitoleic acids (0.3–0.52%). In PS/HOSO blends, the amounts of total saturated ΣSFA (palmitic and stearic) were higher compared with monounsaturated fatty acids (ΣMUFA) (oleic and palmitoleic) and ΣPUFA (linoleic and linolenic). Similar results were reported by Mayamol et al. [10], who assayed the fatty acid profiles of binary blends of PS and rice bran oil, finding as main components palmitic (37.4–43.2%), oleic (34.3–36.3%), linoleic (16.5–20.6%), stearic (2.9–3.0%), and linolenic (0.31–0.51%) acids. Recently, Latip et al. [21] reported in a binary mixture of 50% PS/50% sunflower oil a higher composition of palmitic (36.3%), linoleic (31.7%), oleic (25.2), and stearic (4.7%) acids.Table 3
Fatty acid compositions of zero-trans crystallized fats produced from palm stearin-high oleic safflower oil blends compared to commercial hydrogenated shortening1,2.
Fatty acids composition (wt%)†
Shortening
Hydrogenated commercial shortening
PS/HOSO3 (50 : 50)
PS/HOSO (70 : 30)
PS/HOSO (90 : 10)
Myristic (14:0)
N
D
∗
1.59e
1.96e
2.32e
Palmitic (16:0)
22.02b
36.80b
47.84a
56.90a
Stearic (18:0)
18.89c
4.90d
4.74d
4.42d
ΣSFA4
40.91
43.29
54.54
63.64
Palmitoleic (16:1 n-7)
N
D
∗
0.30f
0.34f
0.52f
Oleic (18:1 n-9)
38.01a
42.90a
37.77b
27.15b
ΣMUFA5
38.01
43.20
38.11
27.67
Linoleic (18:2 n-6)
4.01e
12.38c
7.06c
6.17c
Linolenic (18:3 n-3)
N
D
∗
N
D
∗
N
D
∗
N
D
∗
ΣPUFA6
4.01
12.38
7.06
6.17
Trans fatty acids
17.02d
N
D
∗
N
D
∗
N
D
∗
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
1 letter within each column indicates highly significant differences (p<0.05). Values2 are the mean of three replicates; PS/HOSO3 = palm stearin-high oleic safflower oil blends; SFA4 = saturated fatty acids; MUFA5 = monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA6 = polyunsaturated fatty acids; weight† percentage; ND∗: not detectable.As the concentration of PS increased in the PS/HOSO blends the content of SFA also increased, particularly palmitic acid. Among all blends, the one consisting of 50% PS/50% HOSO contained the lowest levels of ΣSFA (43.29%) and highest levels of both ΣMUFA (43.20%) and ΣPUFA (12.38%). On the other hand, the 90% PS/10% HOSO blend contained the highest levels of ΣSFA (63.64%) and lowest levels of ΣMUFA (27.67%) and ΣPUFA (6.17%), respectively. Addition of 90% of PS to blend increased levels of palmitic acid up to 19.8% and decreased the amounts of oleic acid, down to 14.7%. All PS/HOSO experimental blends did not contain assayable levels of TFA. The differences observed among blends could be attributed to the typical fatty acid compositions of PS [10, 17, 34] and HOSO. The observed changes in fatty acids profile clearly affected the functional characteristics of binary mixtures [21].The HCS had higher levels of ΣSFA (40.91%), ΣMUFA (38.01%), TFA (17.02%), and only 4.01% of ΣPUFA (Table3). Commonly, the HCS contain from 20 to 40% TFA [1] which have beneficial effects on the texture and appearance of foods products but adverse health implications. It is known that TFA increases low-density lipoprotein (LDL) serum levels. If the blood keeps excess levels of LDL-cholesterol there is an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases [2–5].The concentration of palmitic acid was highest in all blends of PS/HOSO. This particular saturated fatty acid has no adverse effect on serum lipoprotein profiles [35]. The most suitable blend, considering all physical properties analyzed, was the one containing 50% PS/50% HOSO. This particular blend had a fairly balanced FA composition (36.80% palmitic, 42.90% oleic, and 12.38% linoleic acids), did not containtrans fatty acid isomers, and had adequate functionality as a natural vegetable shortening. Therefore, it is suitable as food ingredient for the development of new functional foods with clean labels.


### 3.3. Polymorphism

The patterns of XDR and polymorphic forms of fat crystals from PS and PS/HOSO blends obtained at different agitation rates and HCS are depicted in Table4. The polymorphic forms of fat crystals are of upmost importance because they are closely related to the functional properties of shortenings [14]. Regardless of the ratio of PS/HOSO and agitation rates, all blends tempered at 25°C possessed the β-crystal polymorphic forms. All PS/HOSO blends exhibited short-spacing which lied between 4.54, 3.86, and 3.73 Å. These spaces are distinctive and characteristic patterns for β crystals. In our study, the tempering at 30 ± 1°C affected the β′ crystal formation for all samples. However, these blends presented a smooth consistency throughout 5 days’ storage time. These PS/HOSO blends promoted the most stable β polymorphic form, but the least desirable in terms of crystal size. The PS presented β′ polymorphic form [36]. However, in our study PS exhibited a tendency to the forms β≈β′ (Table 1). The results obtained from the experimental blends (PS/HOSO) presented similarity to those reported by Nor Aini et al. [37]; Jeyarani and Reddy [13]; Mayamol et al. [14]; and Berger and Idris [38] who formulated blends of palm stearin varying the type of other complementing vegetable oils (rice bran, sesame, or soybean oil). These authors also elaborated tertiary blends palm oil-palm stearin-palm kernel olein (40 : 30 : 30) obtaining in finished products the presence of β polymorphic forms [37].Table 4
X-ray diffraction patterns after stabilization at 25°C for 24 h of zero-trans crystallized fats produced from palm stearin-high oleic safflower oil blends compared to commercial hydrogenated shortening1,2.
Concentration PS/HOSO3 (%)
Rate agitation (rpm)
Short-spacing (Å)4
4.5
4.4
4.1
3.9
3.8
3.7
PF5
50 : 50
1000
4.48a
3.81b
3.74c
β
2000
4.48a
3.81b
3.74c
β
3000
4.48a
3.81b
3.74c
β
70 : 30
1000
4.54a
3.86b
3.73c
β
2000
4.54a
3.86b
3.73c
β
3000
4.54a
3.86b
3.73c
β
90 : 10
1000
4.46a
3.82b
3.66c
β
2000
4.46a
3.82b
3.66c
β
3000
4.46a
3.82b
3.66c
β
Hydrogenated commercial shortening
—
4.46a
4.10b
3.70c
β
′
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
1 letters indicate significant differences in the same row (p<0.05). Values2 are the mean of three replicates; PS/HOSO3 = palm stearin-safflower high oleic oil blends; Å4 = angstrom; PF5 = polymorphic forms.The HCS showed short-spacing between 4.42, 4.14, and 3.72 Å, characteristics of a pattern forβ′ crystal (Table 4) associated with most vegetable shortenings. It is important to mention that animal fats contain β forms [39, 40]. Fats with β′ form are preferred for plastic shortenings as the crystals tend to be smaller, more uniform, and smoother, whereas the β form imparts sandiness and graininess [10, 41]. It is reported that a palmitic acid content above 44% in fats crystallizes in β′ polymorphic forms desirable in margarines and shortenings [11]. However, in our study, high percentages of palmitic acid contents were observed in the PS/HOSO blends (37.8 to 57.7%) and therefore this particular fatty acid limited the formation of high levels of β′ crystals. The use of PS to produce the zero-transshortenings and the proposed strategy of adding the HOSO to the blends were essential to favor the formation of β polymorph crystals. The blend PS/HOSO could be used in bakery products such as cookies, wheat flour tortillas, and others.


### 3.4. Consistency

The PS and HOSO ratios, speed of agitation, and storage temperatures (12°C, 20°C, or 30°C) affected significantly (p<0.05) the consistency of the blends (Figure 1). The consistency decreased sharply with a decrease in storage temperature for all blends. When PS was added in higher amounts, the consistency decreased for all tested temperatures. Some experimental blends showed comparable consistencies compared with HCS (150–300 mm/10 g) in spite of their modified fatty acid composition (high in unsaturated fatty acids with zero-TFA) (Table 3). The blends containing 50%, 70%, or 90% of PS/HOSO had consistencies similar to hydrogenated commercial shortening. Additionally, at lower temperatures (12°C), all PS/HOSO blends showed a consistency similar to commercial bakery fats, while, at higher temperature (20°C), the 70% and 90% PS/HOSO blends exhibited consistencies similar to HCS. The consistency of 150–300 mm/10 g at the temperature of 30°C is advantageous for use in cake manufacturing as it can retain the air incorporated during whipping and baking, and besides it is advantageous for better creaming performance [32, 42]. The 90% PS/10% HOSO blend stored at 30°C had a consistency similar to HCS, but it was not suitable as plastic fat, because of its relatively high-melting point (50°C) and low IV (34.03) (Table 2). A shortening with these features imparts a waxy mouthfeel [14]. The HCS contained emulsifiers that allow crystal growth and/or polymorphic transitions which improved the consistency necessary for commercial bakery fats [43]. Furthermore, according to Mayamol et al. [14] crystallized fats manufactured from high amounts of palm stearin and low amounts of vegetable oil (90 : 10) tend to gradually produce grainy textured fats mainly because of their high amounts of β crystal polymorphic forms. This undesirable texture is also attributed to the high-melting point of the palm stearin. In several instances, this crystal transformation can produce oil exudation from the fat crystals with the partial coalescence of the aqueous phase and separation. Moreover, blends with high concentrations of palm stearin take longer to form fat crystals [38].Figure 1
Effect of PS/HOSO (palm stearin and high oleic safflower oil) blends and rate of agitation (ra) on the consistency of zero-trans crystallized fats equilibrated at three storage temperatures.The PS is composed of high-melting triacylglycerides, which resulted in a hard consistency (240 mm/10 g) at 30°C. The mixing improved miscibility between the PS and HOSO. These PS/HOSO blends therefore are not operable over a wide range of temperatures. The blends equilibrated at low temperatures (12°C) presented a hard consistency; however, counterparts equilibrated at 30°C exhibited a desirable softer texture. Nevertheless, blends stored at 30°C presented oil exudation and phase separation.The consistency of the blend produced with 50% PS/50% HOSO was comparable to the PS and canola oil mixture used for a production of wheat doughs for baking [20]. The direct blending is the preferred method for formulation of zero-trans crystallized fats because it enhances the miscibility between vegetable oils and saturated fats [14]. Hence this method could assist in eliminating the posthardening phenomena, which was very notorious in PS-based fats [10]. Blends of PS with other oils (rice bran oil, canola oil, sesame oil, and soybean oil) and fats provided good plasticity and consistency [10, 12, 14]. Results herein demonstrated that the combination by direct blending of PS with HOSO could provide an array of new fat products with the desired consistency.


## 3.1. Physicals Properties

The results of the color, refraction index, melting point, density, acidity, moisture, and peroxide and iodine values of palm stearin, high oleic safflower oil, PS/HOSO crystallized blends mixed at different agitation rates, and HCS are depicted in Tables1 and 2. As expected, the various physical properties were significantly affected (p<0.05) by the different ratios of PS and HOSO. Hydrogenated fats should have a red color value of 1.5 [32]. Among the experimental blends, the color of the 90% PS/10% HOSO mix had higher reddish (3.0) scores (p<0.05) compared to the control HCS (2.0). The observed differences in color can be attributed to PS addition, HOSO addition, and fat type (vegetable or animal sources). The PS had a higher red color score of 3.5. This could be attributed to the presence of tocopherols and β-carotenes that are responsible for imparting orange, reddish, and yellow colorations [14, 33]. Furthermore, the HOSO contained high concentrations of total tocopherols (178 ppm) which contained 85.82%  α-tocopherol [28].Table 1
Physical properties, fatty acid compositions, and consistencies of palm stearin and high oleic saffloweroil1.
Characteristics
Palm stearin
High oleic safflower oil
Colour (Lovibond red)
3.50
1.00
Refractive index (50/25°C)
1.45
1.463
Melting point (°C)
52.00
—
Relative density (60/25°C; g/ml)
0.8728
0.919
Acidity (Oleic%)
0.0375
0.21
Peroxides (Meq O2/Kg)
0.20
0.50
Moisture and volatile matter (%)
0.22
0.05
Iodine value (gr. I2/100 gr)
32.23
90.00
Fatty acids composition (%)†
Myristic (14:0)
1.83
N
D
∗
Palmitic (16:0)
55.33
6.09
Palmitoleic (16:1 n-7)
0.83
ND
Stearic (18:0)
9.72
2.64
Oleic (18:1 n-9)
22.84
77.50
Linoleic (18:2 n-6)
8.75
12.01
Linolenic (18:3 n-3)
0.66
0.25
Fatty acidstrans
N
D
∗
N
D
∗
Polymorphic forms
β
≈
β
′
β
Consistency (mm/10 g) to:
12°C
70.00
—
20°C
117.00
—
30°C
209.00
—
V
a
l
u
e
s
1 are the mean of three replicates; weight† percentage; ND∗: not detectable.Table 2
Physical properties of zero-trans crystallized fats produced from palm stearin-high oleic safflower oil blends compared to hydrogenated commercial shortening1,2.
Concentration PS/HOSO3 (%)
Rate of agitation (rpm)
Color (red)
RI4
Melting point (°C)
Density (g/mL)
Acidity (Oleic %)
Peroxides (Meq O2/Kg)
Moisture (°C)
Iodine value (gr. I2/100 gr)
50 : 50
1000
2.7
c
1.4610a
46c
0.908d
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
52.45a
2000
2.7
c
1.4610a
46c
0.909c
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
52.45a
3000
2.7
c
1.4610a
46c
0.908d
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
52.45a
70 : 30
1000
2.9
b
1.4595b
48b
0.931b
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
46.45b
2000
2.9
b
1.4595b
48b
0.932a
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
46.45b
3000
2.9
b
1.4595b
48b
0.931b
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
46.45b
90 : 10
1000
3.0
a
1.4580d
50a
0.877e
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
34.03d
2000
3.0
a
1.4580d
50a
0.877e
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
34.03d
3000
3.0
a
1.4580d
50a
0.877e
0.015a
0.60a
0.5a
34.03d
Hydrogenated commercialshortening
2.0
d
1.4590c
45d
0.810f
0.015a
0.55b
0.4b
43.00c
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
1 letter within each column indicates highly significant differences (p<0.05). Values2 are the mean of three replicates; PS/HOSO3 = palm stearin-high oleic safflower oil blends; RI4 = refractive index (50/25°C).Various blends containing PS and vegetable oils were screened based on iodine value (IV) and melting point [10, 17]. IV is an important parameter used in the hydrogenation industry because its value is closely related to melting point and oxidative stability. Shortenings with low-iodine value have lower melting points and are less susceptible to oxidation or are more stable [17]. The IV of HOSO was 90 (Table 1). After blending with the hard fraction of the palm oil, there was a decrease in IV. As expected, the lowest value was observed in the blend containing 90% palm stearin. There was a gradual increase in the melting point from 46°C to 50°C when the PS concentration in the PS/HOSO blends increased (Table 2). Hydrogenated fats should have a melting point between 35°C and 45°C [26] and the PS showed a melting point of 52°C (Table 1). The melting point of the blends containing PS of 90% was higher compared to the 50% blend (Table 2). There were no significant differences (p>0.05) in the acidity, peroxide value, and moisture of the blends. The PS did not affect significantly (p>0.05) the physical properties of the experimental blends.


## 3.2. Fatty Acids Profile

The fatty acid profiles of PS/HOSO blends (50 : 50, 70 : 30, and 90 : 10) processed at agitation rates of 3000 rpm and HCS are presented in Table3. As expected, the FAP was significantly affected (p<0.05) by addition of different ratios of PS and HOSO. The PS presented higher content of palmitic and oleic acids (49.81% and 20.56%, resp.) whereas the HOSO contained comparatively higher levels of oleic and linoleic acids (77.50% and 12.01%, resp.) (Table 1). The FAP of the PS/HOSO blends indicated that the components in order of abundance were palmitic (36.8–56.9%), oleic (27.1–42.9%), linoleic (6.1–12.3%), stearic (4.4–4.9%), and palmitoleic acids (0.3–0.52%). In PS/HOSO blends, the amounts of total saturated ΣSFA (palmitic and stearic) were higher compared with monounsaturated fatty acids (ΣMUFA) (oleic and palmitoleic) and ΣPUFA (linoleic and linolenic). Similar results were reported by Mayamol et al. [10], who assayed the fatty acid profiles of binary blends of PS and rice bran oil, finding as main components palmitic (37.4–43.2%), oleic (34.3–36.3%), linoleic (16.5–20.6%), stearic (2.9–3.0%), and linolenic (0.31–0.51%) acids. Recently, Latip et al. [21] reported in a binary mixture of 50% PS/50% sunflower oil a higher composition of palmitic (36.3%), linoleic (31.7%), oleic (25.2), and stearic (4.7%) acids.Table 3
Fatty acid compositions of zero-trans crystallized fats produced from palm stearin-high oleic safflower oil blends compared to commercial hydrogenated shortening1,2.
Fatty acids composition (wt%)†
Shortening
Hydrogenated commercial shortening
PS/HOSO3 (50 : 50)
PS/HOSO (70 : 30)
PS/HOSO (90 : 10)
Myristic (14:0)
N
D
∗
1.59e
1.96e
2.32e
Palmitic (16:0)
22.02b
36.80b
47.84a
56.90a
Stearic (18:0)
18.89c
4.90d
4.74d
4.42d
ΣSFA4
40.91
43.29
54.54
63.64
Palmitoleic (16:1 n-7)
N
D
∗
0.30f
0.34f
0.52f
Oleic (18:1 n-9)
38.01a
42.90a
37.77b
27.15b
ΣMUFA5
38.01
43.20
38.11
27.67
Linoleic (18:2 n-6)
4.01e
12.38c
7.06c
6.17c
Linolenic (18:3 n-3)
N
D
∗
N
D
∗
N
D
∗
N
D
∗
ΣPUFA6
4.01
12.38
7.06
6.17
Trans fatty acids
17.02d
N
D
∗
N
D
∗
N
D
∗
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
1 letter within each column indicates highly significant differences (p<0.05). Values2 are the mean of three replicates; PS/HOSO3 = palm stearin-high oleic safflower oil blends; SFA4 = saturated fatty acids; MUFA5 = monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA6 = polyunsaturated fatty acids; weight† percentage; ND∗: not detectable.As the concentration of PS increased in the PS/HOSO blends the content of SFA also increased, particularly palmitic acid. Among all blends, the one consisting of 50% PS/50% HOSO contained the lowest levels of ΣSFA (43.29%) and highest levels of both ΣMUFA (43.20%) and ΣPUFA (12.38%). On the other hand, the 90% PS/10% HOSO blend contained the highest levels of ΣSFA (63.64%) and lowest levels of ΣMUFA (27.67%) and ΣPUFA (6.17%), respectively. Addition of 90% of PS to blend increased levels of palmitic acid up to 19.8% and decreased the amounts of oleic acid, down to 14.7%. All PS/HOSO experimental blends did not contain assayable levels of TFA. The differences observed among blends could be attributed to the typical fatty acid compositions of PS [10, 17, 34] and HOSO. The observed changes in fatty acids profile clearly affected the functional characteristics of binary mixtures [21].The HCS had higher levels of ΣSFA (40.91%), ΣMUFA (38.01%), TFA (17.02%), and only 4.01% of ΣPUFA (Table3). Commonly, the HCS contain from 20 to 40% TFA [1] which have beneficial effects on the texture and appearance of foods products but adverse health implications. It is known that TFA increases low-density lipoprotein (LDL) serum levels. If the blood keeps excess levels of LDL-cholesterol there is an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases [2–5].The concentration of palmitic acid was highest in all blends of PS/HOSO. This particular saturated fatty acid has no adverse effect on serum lipoprotein profiles [35]. The most suitable blend, considering all physical properties analyzed, was the one containing 50% PS/50% HOSO. This particular blend had a fairly balanced FA composition (36.80% palmitic, 42.90% oleic, and 12.38% linoleic acids), did not containtrans fatty acid isomers, and had adequate functionality as a natural vegetable shortening. Therefore, it is suitable as food ingredient for the development of new functional foods with clean labels.


## 3.3. Polymorphism

The patterns of XDR and polymorphic forms of fat crystals from PS and PS/HOSO blends obtained at different agitation rates and HCS are depicted in Table4. The polymorphic forms of fat crystals are of upmost importance because they are closely related to the functional properties of shortenings [14]. Regardless of the ratio of PS/HOSO and agitation rates, all blends tempered at 25°C possessed the β-crystal polymorphic forms. All PS/HOSO blends exhibited short-spacing which lied between 4.54, 3.86, and 3.73 Å. These spaces are distinctive and characteristic patterns for β crystals. In our study, the tempering at 30 ± 1°C affected the β′ crystal formation for all samples. However, these blends presented a smooth consistency throughout 5 days’ storage time. These PS/HOSO blends promoted the most stable β polymorphic form, but the least desirable in terms of crystal size. The PS presented β′ polymorphic form [36]. However, in our study PS exhibited a tendency to the forms β≈β′ (Table 1). The results obtained from the experimental blends (PS/HOSO) presented similarity to those reported by Nor Aini et al. [37]; Jeyarani and Reddy [13]; Mayamol et al. [14]; and Berger and Idris [38] who formulated blends of palm stearin varying the type of other complementing vegetable oils (rice bran, sesame, or soybean oil). These authors also elaborated tertiary blends palm oil-palm stearin-palm kernel olein (40 : 30 : 30) obtaining in finished products the presence of β polymorphic forms [37].Table 4
X-ray diffraction patterns after stabilization at 25°C for 24 h of zero-trans crystallized fats produced from palm stearin-high oleic safflower oil blends compared to commercial hydrogenated shortening1,2.
Concentration PS/HOSO3 (%)
Rate agitation (rpm)
Short-spacing (Å)4
4.5
4.4
4.1
3.9
3.8
3.7
PF5
50 : 50
1000
4.48a
3.81b
3.74c
β
2000
4.48a
3.81b
3.74c
β
3000
4.48a
3.81b
3.74c
β
70 : 30
1000
4.54a
3.86b
3.73c
β
2000
4.54a
3.86b
3.73c
β
3000
4.54a
3.86b
3.73c
β
90 : 10
1000
4.46a
3.82b
3.66c
β
2000
4.46a
3.82b
3.66c
β
3000
4.46a
3.82b
3.66c
β
Hydrogenated commercial shortening
—
4.46a
4.10b
3.70c
β
′
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
1 letters indicate significant differences in the same row (p<0.05). Values2 are the mean of three replicates; PS/HOSO3 = palm stearin-safflower high oleic oil blends; Å4 = angstrom; PF5 = polymorphic forms.The HCS showed short-spacing between 4.42, 4.14, and 3.72 Å, characteristics of a pattern forβ′ crystal (Table 4) associated with most vegetable shortenings. It is important to mention that animal fats contain β forms [39, 40]. Fats with β′ form are preferred for plastic shortenings as the crystals tend to be smaller, more uniform, and smoother, whereas the β form imparts sandiness and graininess [10, 41]. It is reported that a palmitic acid content above 44% in fats crystallizes in β′ polymorphic forms desirable in margarines and shortenings [11]. However, in our study, high percentages of palmitic acid contents were observed in the PS/HOSO blends (37.8 to 57.7%) and therefore this particular fatty acid limited the formation of high levels of β′ crystals. The use of PS to produce the zero-transshortenings and the proposed strategy of adding the HOSO to the blends were essential to favor the formation of β polymorph crystals. The blend PS/HOSO could be used in bakery products such as cookies, wheat flour tortillas, and others.


## 3.4. Consistency

The PS and HOSO ratios, speed of agitation, and storage temperatures (12°C, 20°C, or 30°C) affected significantly (p<0.05) the consistency of the blends (Figure 1). The consistency decreased sharply with a decrease in storage temperature for all blends. When PS was added in higher amounts, the consistency decreased for all tested temperatures. Some experimental blends showed comparable consistencies compared with HCS (150–300 mm/10 g) in spite of their modified fatty acid composition (high in unsaturated fatty acids with zero-TFA) (Table 3). The blends containing 50%, 70%, or 90% of PS/HOSO had consistencies similar to hydrogenated commercial shortening. Additionally, at lower temperatures (12°C), all PS/HOSO blends showed a consistency similar to commercial bakery fats, while, at higher temperature (20°C), the 70% and 90% PS/HOSO blends exhibited consistencies similar to HCS. The consistency of 150–300 mm/10 g at the temperature of 30°C is advantageous for use in cake manufacturing as it can retain the air incorporated during whipping and baking, and besides it is advantageous for better creaming performance [32, 42]. The 90% PS/10% HOSO blend stored at 30°C had a consistency similar to HCS, but it was not suitable as plastic fat, because of its relatively high-melting point (50°C) and low IV (34.03) (Table 2). A shortening with these features imparts a waxy mouthfeel [14]. The HCS contained emulsifiers that allow crystal growth and/or polymorphic transitions which improved the consistency necessary for commercial bakery fats [43]. Furthermore, according to Mayamol et al. [14] crystallized fats manufactured from high amounts of palm stearin and low amounts of vegetable oil (90 : 10) tend to gradually produce grainy textured fats mainly because of their high amounts of β crystal polymorphic forms. This undesirable texture is also attributed to the high-melting point of the palm stearin. In several instances, this crystal transformation can produce oil exudation from the fat crystals with the partial coalescence of the aqueous phase and separation. Moreover, blends with high concentrations of palm stearin take longer to form fat crystals [38].Figure 1
Effect of PS/HOSO (palm stearin and high oleic safflower oil) blends and rate of agitation (ra) on the consistency of zero-trans crystallized fats equilibrated at three storage temperatures.The PS is composed of high-melting triacylglycerides, which resulted in a hard consistency (240 mm/10 g) at 30°C. The mixing improved miscibility between the PS and HOSO. These PS/HOSO blends therefore are not operable over a wide range of temperatures. The blends equilibrated at low temperatures (12°C) presented a hard consistency; however, counterparts equilibrated at 30°C exhibited a desirable softer texture. Nevertheless, blends stored at 30°C presented oil exudation and phase separation.The consistency of the blend produced with 50% PS/50% HOSO was comparable to the PS and canola oil mixture used for a production of wheat doughs for baking [20]. The direct blending is the preferred method for formulation of zero-trans crystallized fats because it enhances the miscibility between vegetable oils and saturated fats [14]. Hence this method could assist in eliminating the posthardening phenomena, which was very notorious in PS-based fats [10]. Blends of PS with other oils (rice bran oil, canola oil, sesame oil, and soybean oil) and fats provided good plasticity and consistency [10, 12, 14]. Results herein demonstrated that the combination by direct blending of PS with HOSO could provide an array of new fat products with the desired consistency.


## 4. Conclusions

The direct blending process proposed herein indicated that the 50% PS/50% HOSO blend was ideal for producing zero-transcrystallized fats because this particular blend showed a melting point similar to commercial bakery shortening. This specific blend system free of TFA contained the highest amounts of PUFA and MUFA. These acids are positively related to various health benefits and nutritional properties. Several of the experimental blends showed comparable consistency to hydrogenated shortenings. Thus, zero-transcrystallized plastic fats suitable for use in bakery items can be manufactured utilizing high oleic safflower oil and palm stearin. This strategy has the advantages of producing vegetable fats with enhanced functionality and well-balanced fats rich in both omega 3 and omega 6 fatty acids.



---

*Source: 1253976-2017-11-09.xml*