# Cadmium Uptake and Distribution in Fragrant Rice Genotypes and Related Consequences on Yield and Grain Quality Traits

Authors: Adam Sheka Kanu; Umair Ashraf; Zhaowen Mo; Issaka Fuseini; Lamin R. Mansaray; Meiyang Duan; Shenggan Pan; Xiangru Tang
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) toxicity has varying consequences on plants growth and development. This research focused on examining the influence of Cd toxicity on fragrant rice genotypes and its consequences on yield, yield related parameters, and grain quality traits. Randomized complete block design comprising five different fragrant rice cultivars (Meixiangzhan 2, Xiangyaxiangzhan, Guixiangzhan, Basmati, and Nongxiang 18) and four Cd levels (0, 50, 100, and 150 mg/kg soil) was used. The results showed that, with increased levels of soil Cd toxicity, Cd uptake in roots and distribution to other organs increased in dose dependent manner. Uptake and accumulation were higher in roots than in shoots with the highest uptake in both roots and shoots observed in Meixiangzhan 2, followed by Nongxiang 18, Basmati, Xiangyaxiangzhan, and Guixiangzhan cultivars. With increased Cd toxicity, yield and yield parameters were affected in all cultivars. Grain quality was also found affected under Cd stress condition. The results suggested that soil Cd toxicity has negative consequences on rice performance and uptake varies among cultivars. Conclusively, Cd toxicity impaired rice yield formation and grain quality by altering yield components (panicles number, spikelet per panicles, and spikelet setting (%)); however, Guixiangzhan variety performed better, while Meixiangzhan 2 performed less in terms of minimum Cd uptake and distribution to grains, yield, and grain quality reduction under Cd stress condition.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Cadmium (Cd) is among the most toxic heavy metals deposited in agricultural soils through natural means and man-made activities like the application of sewage sludge containing Cd contents, application of phosphate fertilizers, and waste disposal as well as metal smelting [1, 2]. Cadmium toxicity in agricultural soils is a serious threat to crop production worldwide [3]. Even at low concentration and due to its nonessential form in living organisms, Cd becomes highly toxic to both growing plant and animals, thus, affecting plant morphologically, physiologically, and biochemically during growth. Cadmium can be taken up by rice roots and then translocated to shoots and grains of growing rice [4]. The most common visible symptoms of Cd toxicity in growing rice plants include reduction in plant growth and development, chlorosis, and eventually plant death. High Cd accumulation in rice consumed by animals, especially humans, poses several health implications such as cardiac failure, anemia, cancer, hypertension, emphysema, proteinuria, cerebrovascular infarction, damage to the lungs, renal dysfunction in eyes, and osteoporosis [5, 6]. Cadmium translocation from soil to roots and shoot and finally to the edible plant parts is often the easiest pathway through which Cd enters the human body [7]. Research has shown that nearly sixteen percent (16%) of the agricultural soils in China have been polluted by varying heavy metals, and Cd has polluted approximately 1.3 × 105 hm2 and 1.46 × 108 kg of the soils and agricultural products, respectively; this also included 50 000 tons of rice [8].Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a major cereal crop cultivated and consumed worldwide; it is the second most important cereal crop after wheat in terms of area cultivated and consumption rate [9]. Rice growth and development are eminent at all stages for ensuring seedlings development and yield formation. At the vegetative stage, rice growth comprises roots development for nutrients uptake, hypocotyl elongation, and enzymes activation for mobilizing stored energy and nutrients as well as photosynthetic processes, whereas the reproductive stage in rice growth enables maximum yield formation. Heavy metals in paddy soils affect rice growth and performance; for instance, Cd stress has been proven to affect plants morphologically and physiologically as well as disrupting antioxidants enzymes in rice seedlings under polluted soils. Reports have shown reduction in rice growth and biomass, which might possibly be as a result of different Cd-mediated toxicity mechanisms in rice [10]. Various other studies have also reported that the toxic effects of Cd increased rice seedlings oxidative stress by releasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) like malondialdehyde (MDA) contents, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and electrolyte leakage which affects rice growth and performance [10, 11]. Cadmium toxicity also altered leaf and root ultrastructure and caused structural damage to photosynthetic apparatus of rice [12].From several other studies conducted, marked differences in Cd uptake and translocation among plant species as well as among cultivars within the same species were observed [6, 12, 13].During rice growth, Cd toxicity levels in soils and potential damage to plants are difficult to establish due to the susceptibility and tolerant abilities of some cultivars. Cd translocation from soil to plant organs is an important factor in identifying specific cultivars and concentration level considered toxic for varying rice cultivars. Different cultivars showed differential response regarding Cd uptake and transport under heavy metal stress conditions; however their response does vary based on concentration and cultivar genotypic storage and translocation potential [14]. Furthermore, the tolerance and sensitivity indices of a specific rice cultivar are related to root Cd storage ability and its speciation in above-ground plant parts. Considering the importance attached to fragrance rice by its desirable consumers as well as its high market value, it has become necessary to evaluate the response of different scented rice cultivars to varying levels of cadmium toxicity. Hence, the need for this research study is to evaluate the effect of varying Cd toxicity on five selected rice cultivars in China. Identifying rice cultivars with minimal Cd accumulating character in roots and with less translocation ability in other parts might be a better option to grow rice in Cd toxic soils.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Experimental Design and Treatments Application

Pot experiment was conducted in rain protected greenhouse under open-air conditions at the experimental research farm (College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University), Guangzhou city (23°14′ N, 113°37′ E, 20 M altitude), during 2015/2016 cropping years. Paddy soil from the research farm was collected to a depth of 20 cm. The air dried soil sample was sieved through a 4 mm sieve, mixed thoroughly, and filled in the pots (25 cm diameter × 30 cm height). About 10 kg soil was filled in each pot and Cd (1.5, 2.2, and 3.0 g) in the form of CdCl2·2.5 H2O was added to the soil to obtain the required soil Cd concentrations of 50, 100, and 150 mg/kg, respectively. Cd = 0 mg/Kg was added as control. The pots once filled with soil were thoroughly mixed with the exact amount of Cd (CdCl2·2.5 H2O) based on the treatment and kept for 15 days before seedlings were transplanted in them. The pots were arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with each treatment replicated three times. The soil used for the experiment was analyzed and was found to contain 4.96 mg/kg Cd content, 5.92 pH level, and 18.73 g/kg organic matter contents, while total NPK was 0.81, 0.9, and 16.79 g/kg, and available NPK was 69.15, 10.15, and 109.62 mg/kg, respectively.


### 2.2. Rice Cultivars Preparation

The five aromatic rice varieties, namely, Meixiangzhan 2 (V1), Xiangyaxiangzhan (V2), Guixiangzhan (V3), Basmati (V4), and Nongxiang 18 (V5), were secured from the Department of Crop Science and Technology, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou. Rice seeds were first soaked in deionized water for about 48 hrs at room temperature (25–28°C) and nursed on March 3, 2015, in an uncontaminated soil using parachute trays under moist conditions. After 30 days (April 3, 2015), the seedlings were transplanted into the pots (4 seedlings per pot). The pots were maintained under flooded conditions of 2-3 cm water level above the soil surface during the entire growth period. Recommended rates of fertilizers were split-applied as basal application prior to transplanting and were top-dressed 5 weeks after transplanting. Samples for Cd uptake in rice organs were collected at panicle heading and maturity stages. Entire rice was harvested and yield parameters were measured at maturity. The samples were separated into roots, stems leaves, and grains and were oven-dried at 80°C to constant weight for analysis of plants Cd uptake in roots, stems, leaves, and grains.


### 2.3. Yield and Its Components

During maturity stage, three pots from each treatment were randomly selected. Rice plants from each treatment pot were manually harvested using sickle and then threshed. The paddy was sun-dried to moisture content and grain yield per pot determined and expressed in grams per pot (g pot−1). Total panicles per pot were counted for each treatment and means recorded. Filled and unfilled grains were separated and counted manually from each panicle to obtain total number of filled and unfilled grains per panicle. 1000-grain weight was recorded by weighing randomly sampled 1000 filled grains.


### 2.4. Grain Quality Estimation

Grain quality determination was carried out after harvesting, threshing, and sun-drying of rice. Rice grains were then stored at room temperature for a period of three months to determine their quality traits. About 500 g of rice grain from each treatment was weighed from the stored grains. Brown rice rate was estimated using a rice huller (Jiangsu, China) while milled rice and head rice rates were measured with a Jingmi testing rice grader (Zhejiang, China). Grains chalkiness degree was determined using an SDE-A light box (Guangzhou, China). Grain protein and amylose contents were measured using an Infratec 1241 grain analyzer (FOSS-TECATOR).


### 2.5. Determination of Cd Content and Translocation Factor between Rice Organs

Cadmium content in rice roots, stems, leaves, and grains was determined by separating entire plant into roots, stems, leaves, and grains and then dried in an oven at 80°C till constant weight. The oven dried plant parts of each were then ground into powdered form using stainless steel grinders. About 0.2 g of the ground samples was weighed for each treatment and digested with di-acid mixture of HNO3 : H2O2 (4 : 1v/v), and the resultant solutions were diluted to 25 ml and then filtered using Whatman filter papers. The Cd concentrations in the filtrate were then determined using an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AA6300C, Shimadzu, Japan). The translocation factor (TF) for Cd among roots, shoot, leaves, and grains was calculated by estimating the compartment concentration of Cd in one part with respect to the other parts as described by [15].


### 2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data obtained in this study were analyzed using Microsoft excel 2007 and subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the mean differences were compared by Fisher’s LSD using Statistix 8 (Analytical, Tallahassee, Florida, USA). Differences atP<0.05 were considered significant.


## 2.1. Experimental Design and Treatments Application

Pot experiment was conducted in rain protected greenhouse under open-air conditions at the experimental research farm (College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University), Guangzhou city (23°14′ N, 113°37′ E, 20 M altitude), during 2015/2016 cropping years. Paddy soil from the research farm was collected to a depth of 20 cm. The air dried soil sample was sieved through a 4 mm sieve, mixed thoroughly, and filled in the pots (25 cm diameter × 30 cm height). About 10 kg soil was filled in each pot and Cd (1.5, 2.2, and 3.0 g) in the form of CdCl2·2.5 H2O was added to the soil to obtain the required soil Cd concentrations of 50, 100, and 150 mg/kg, respectively. Cd = 0 mg/Kg was added as control. The pots once filled with soil were thoroughly mixed with the exact amount of Cd (CdCl2·2.5 H2O) based on the treatment and kept for 15 days before seedlings were transplanted in them. The pots were arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with each treatment replicated three times. The soil used for the experiment was analyzed and was found to contain 4.96 mg/kg Cd content, 5.92 pH level, and 18.73 g/kg organic matter contents, while total NPK was 0.81, 0.9, and 16.79 g/kg, and available NPK was 69.15, 10.15, and 109.62 mg/kg, respectively.


## 2.2. Rice Cultivars Preparation

The five aromatic rice varieties, namely, Meixiangzhan 2 (V1), Xiangyaxiangzhan (V2), Guixiangzhan (V3), Basmati (V4), and Nongxiang 18 (V5), were secured from the Department of Crop Science and Technology, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou. Rice seeds were first soaked in deionized water for about 48 hrs at room temperature (25–28°C) and nursed on March 3, 2015, in an uncontaminated soil using parachute trays under moist conditions. After 30 days (April 3, 2015), the seedlings were transplanted into the pots (4 seedlings per pot). The pots were maintained under flooded conditions of 2-3 cm water level above the soil surface during the entire growth period. Recommended rates of fertilizers were split-applied as basal application prior to transplanting and were top-dressed 5 weeks after transplanting. Samples for Cd uptake in rice organs were collected at panicle heading and maturity stages. Entire rice was harvested and yield parameters were measured at maturity. The samples were separated into roots, stems leaves, and grains and were oven-dried at 80°C to constant weight for analysis of plants Cd uptake in roots, stems, leaves, and grains.


## 2.3. Yield and Its Components

During maturity stage, three pots from each treatment were randomly selected. Rice plants from each treatment pot were manually harvested using sickle and then threshed. The paddy was sun-dried to moisture content and grain yield per pot determined and expressed in grams per pot (g pot−1). Total panicles per pot were counted for each treatment and means recorded. Filled and unfilled grains were separated and counted manually from each panicle to obtain total number of filled and unfilled grains per panicle. 1000-grain weight was recorded by weighing randomly sampled 1000 filled grains.


## 2.4. Grain Quality Estimation

Grain quality determination was carried out after harvesting, threshing, and sun-drying of rice. Rice grains were then stored at room temperature for a period of three months to determine their quality traits. About 500 g of rice grain from each treatment was weighed from the stored grains. Brown rice rate was estimated using a rice huller (Jiangsu, China) while milled rice and head rice rates were measured with a Jingmi testing rice grader (Zhejiang, China). Grains chalkiness degree was determined using an SDE-A light box (Guangzhou, China). Grain protein and amylose contents were measured using an Infratec 1241 grain analyzer (FOSS-TECATOR).


## 2.5. Determination of Cd Content and Translocation Factor between Rice Organs

Cadmium content in rice roots, stems, leaves, and grains was determined by separating entire plant into roots, stems, leaves, and grains and then dried in an oven at 80°C till constant weight. The oven dried plant parts of each were then ground into powdered form using stainless steel grinders. About 0.2 g of the ground samples was weighed for each treatment and digested with di-acid mixture of HNO3 : H2O2 (4 : 1v/v), and the resultant solutions were diluted to 25 ml and then filtered using Whatman filter papers. The Cd concentrations in the filtrate were then determined using an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AA6300C, Shimadzu, Japan). The translocation factor (TF) for Cd among roots, shoot, leaves, and grains was calculated by estimating the compartment concentration of Cd in one part with respect to the other parts as described by [15].


## 2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data obtained in this study were analyzed using Microsoft excel 2007 and subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the mean differences were compared by Fisher’s LSD using Statistix 8 (Analytical, Tallahassee, Florida, USA). Differences atP<0.05 were considered significant.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Cadmium Uptake and Distribution in Different Rice Organs at Heading Stage (ug g−1)

Cd accumulation and distribution in roots, stem, leaves, and grains for all the five cultivars were determined at panicle heading and maturity stages and results presented in Figures1 and 2. The results revealed significant differences in Cd uptake among treatments of the same cultivars. Uptake was found increased in dose dependent manner. With increased soil Cd toxicity, Cd uptake in rice plant parts also increased. At panicle heading stage, Cd uptake was found higher in roots and then stems and less accumulation was observed in leaves. In terms of cultivars ability to accumulate Cd, cultivar 3 accumulated more Cd in roots and less in stems and leaves, while cultivar 1 accumulated less Cd in roots and maximum in above-plant parts. Though variation in Cd uptake among the five rice cultivars existed, accumulation differs in Cd concentrations among the different rice organs of the same plant. The trend of Cd uptake and distribution showed that root accumulated maximum Cd contents followed by shoots and leaves. The accumulated Cd contents in roots were higher than shoots and leaves in all cultivars. Hence, lower Cd content in roots of some cultivars with higher Cd in the stems and leaves and, in other cultivars, higher Cd content in roots with lower Cd in the stems and leaves indicated the roots ability to uptake maximum and minimum Cd from the soil and translocate less or more to the stems and leaves. Although greater differences exist in root Cd accumulation, these differences were found smaller in shoots and leaves. Overall, the values of Cd concentrations in shoots were greatest in Meixiangzhan 2 (V1) compared to the other rice cultivars (Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c)).Figure 1
Cd uptake in (a) roots, (b) stems, and (c) leaves of the five different rice cultivars under induced Cd stress at panicle heading stage. The values are representative of three replicated means per treatment ± SE. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments atP≤0.05, LSD.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 2
Cd accumulation in (a) roots, (b) stems, (c) leaves, and (d) grains of the five different rice cultivars under induced Cd stress at maturity stage. The values are representative of three replicated means per treatment ±SE. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments atP≤0.05, LSD.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)During maturity stage (Figures2(a), 2(b), 2(c), and 2(d)), similar trend in Cd uptake was also observed in all cultivars and organs of the same plant as in panicle heading stage. With increased level of Cd induced in the soil, Cd uptake in roots, stems, leaves, and grains was found elevated. Cd uptake was found higher in roots and lower in above-ground plants part with V3 and V2 cultivars accumulating more Cd in roots and less in shoots and grains compared to the other cultivars, while cultivars v1 and v5 accumulated less Cd in roots and higher in shoots and grains. This can be as a result of cultivars tolerance or sensitive ability in uptaking and translocating Cd to plant parts under Cd stress conditions.


### 3.2. Translocation Factor (TF) of Cd Contents between Organs of the Five Different Rice Cultivars at Panicle Heading and Maturity Stages

Cd translocation factors from roots to stems, stems to leaves, and leaves to grains were computed and presented in Table1. Translocation factor varies during the panicle heading and maturity stages. The values were found higher in stems to leaves transference than roots to stems at all levels of Cd treatments. Across cultivars, highest values for Cd translocation from roots to shoots and from shoots to leaves were noticed in varieties 3, 4, and 2 respectively, while translocation from roots to shoots and grain in cultivars v3 and v2 was minimal compared to the other cultivars; this is as a result of the cultivars ability to accumulate maximum Cd in roots and transfer less to shoots.Table 1
Translocation factor (TF) of Cd contents between organs of the five different rice cultivars at panicle heading and maturity stages.
Variety
Treatment
Panicle heading stage
Maturity stage
Roots-stemsTF
Stems- leavesTF
Roots-stemsTF
Stems- leavesTF
Leaves-grainsTF
V1
Cd0
0.552
0.435
0.605
0.846
0.114
Cd1
0.167
0.336
0.442
0.278
0.305
Cd2
0.140
0.495
0.539
0.307
0.318
Cd3
0.143
0.420
0.597
0.367
0.413
V2
Cd0
0.641
0.590
0.573
0.759
0.092
Cd1
0.235
0.308
0.186
0.384
0.181
Cd2
0.237
0.313
0.185
0.360
0.494
Cd3
0.221
0.289
0.173
0.309
0.514
V3
Cd0
0.691
0.572
0.611
0.904
0.062
Cd1
0.197
0.396
0.191
0.738
0.225
Cd2
0.316
0.254
0.323
0.407
0.331
Cd3
0.339
0.253
0.396
0.320
0.343
V4
Cd0
0.567
0.403
0.369
0.893
0.112
Cd1
0.384
0.452
0.370
0.425
0.328
Cd2
0.207
0.600
0.268
0.424
0.437
Cd3
0.181
0.757
0.234
0.355
0.568
V5
Cd0
0.494
0.659
0.487
0.687
0.132
Cd1
0.192
0.369
0.280
0.502
0.318
Cd2
0.191
0.468
0.259
0.419
0.533
Cd3
0.220
0.670
0.321
0.426
0.402
V
n = variety n, Cd0 = 0 mg Cd/kg, Cd1 = 50 mg Cd/kg, Cd2 = 100 mg Cd/kg, and Cd3 = 150 mg Cd/kg.


### 3.3. Effects of Cadmium on Yield and Its Parameters

Yield and yield related parameters were determined after entire rice was harvested and the results are shown in Table2. There was a variation in yield and its parameters for all cultivars and treatments of the same cultivars. In terms of cultivars performance, maximum number of panicles, spikelet per panicle, 1000 grains’ weight, seed setting, and grain yield were observed in cultivar 3 (V3), followed by cultivar 1 (V1), while minimum number of panicles, spikelet per panicle, 1000 grains’ weight, seed setting, and grain yield were observed in cultivar 5 (V5) and cultivar 2 (V2). This shows cultivars performance variation when subjected to the same conditions and agronomic practices. On treatments bases, variation in number of panicles, spikelet per panicle, 1000 grains’ weight, seed setting, and grain yield among treatments were dose dependent. With increased level of soil Cd toxicity, number of panicles per pot, spikelet per panicle, 1000 grains’ weight, seed setting, and grain yield decreased. For grain yield, when compared to control 34.37, 43.25, and 63.85% yield decrease were observed in Cd 1, 2, and 3 for cultivar 1 (V1), 9.57, 31.09, and 39.02% for cultivar 2 (V2), 10.82, 23.51, and 39.95% for cultivar 3 (V3), 12.43, 22.66, and 31.33% for cultivar 4 (V4), and 29.14, 46.16, and 47.66% for cultivar 5 (V5). With the trend shown above, yield decreased as Cd toxicity levels increased and cultivars 1 and 5 showed maximum yield decrease while cultivars 2, 3, and 4 showed minimal yield decrease. This indicated the toxic consequences of Cd on rice yield.Table 2
Effects of cadmium on yield and its parameters.
Variety
Treatment
Panicles/pot
Spikelet number/pot
100-grain weight (g)
Seed setting rate (%)
Grain yield/pot (g)
V1
Cd0
30.33 ± 0.33a
121.07 ± 0.58bc
23.97 ± 0.33a
89.1 ± 0.11a
78.44 ± 1.40a
Cd1
23.66 ± 0.88b
127.52 ± 3.88b
19.88 ± 0.38b
85.963 ± 1.45b
51.48 ± 1.61b
Cd2
20.00 ± 0.57c
142.34 ± 2.87a
19.03 ± 0.32bc
82.293 ± 0.74c
44.51 ± 0.48c
Cd3
17.33 ± 0.88d
113.63 ± 5.25c
18.1 ± 0.11c
79.92 ± 0.45c
28.35 ± 0.05d
V2
Cd0
27.67 ± 0.33a
116.35 ± 2.46c
23.60 ± 0.28a
92.32 ± 0.84a
70.12 ± 1.60a
Cd1
25.33 ± 0.33b
132.01 ± 2.39ab
21.55 ± 0.17b
87.86 ± 1.49b
63.41 ± 2.69b
Cd2
23.66 ± 0.33c
123.49 ± 2.58bc
19.05 ± 0.47c
86.883 ± 0.32b
48.31 ± 0.66c
Cd3
20.33 ± 0.66d
140.32 ± 7.90a
18.63 ± 0.19c
80.697 ± 1.15c
42.75 ± 1.38c
V3
Cd0
32.33 ± 0.33a
113.11 ± 2.03a
24.98 ± 0.24a
93.79 ± 0.72a
85.63 ± 1.01a
Cd1
31.66 ± 0.33a
111.66 ± 0.70a
24.03 ± 0.12ab
89.90 ± 0.25b
76.37 ± 0.19b
Cd2
28.67 ± 0.33b
110.93 ± 0.14a
23.38 ± 0.47bc
88.12 ± 0.42c
65.5 ± 0.73c
Cd3
26.66 ± 0.33c
98.58 ± 2.15b
22.66 ± 0.33c
86.22 ± 0.43d
51.42 ± 2.10d
V4
Cd0
25.66 ± 0.33a
131.33 ± 3.60b
22.44 ± 0.67a
90.29 ± 0.96a
68.37 ± 3.59a
Cd1
23.33 ± 0.33b
139.15 ± 1.73ab
21.05 ± 0.49ab
87.67 ± 1.03a
59.87 ± 1.46b
Cd2
21.66 ± 0.33c
148.57 ± 6.18a
19.66 ± 0.22bc
83.54 ± 0.74b
52.87 ± 2.43bc
Cd3
19.66 ± 0.33d
150.92 ± 3.72a
19.30 ± 0.60c
81.99 ± 0.47b
46.95 ± 1.73c
V5
Cd0
27.66 ± 0.33a
130.58 ± 0.53ab
24.04 ± 0.50a
89.70 ± 0.55a
77.9 ± 1.43a
Cd1
25 ± 0.5774b
117.65 ± 0.60bc
23.44 ± 0.10a
80.05 ± 0.77b
55.19 ± 1.42b
Cd2
24.33 ± 0.66b
103.53 ± 11.81c
21.83 ± 0.56b
77.13 ± 3.54b
41.94 ± 3.22c
Cd3
18.33 ± 0.66c
147.21 ± 4.34a
19.65 ± 0.21c
76.98 ± 1.52b
40.77 ± 1.36c
Three replicated means (±SE) were calculated for each treatment. Values with different letters are significantly different atP<0.05. Vn = variety n, Cd0 = 0 mg Cd/kg, Cd1 = 50 mg Cd/kg, Cd2 = 100 mg Cd/kg, and Cd3 = 150 mg Cd/kg.


### 3.4. Grain Quality Attributes as Influenced by Cd Toxicity

Aromatic rice quality attributes are a significant aspect in rice cultivation and production due to the high price it commands in the market and its desirability by many customers. Hence, quality attributes of fragrant rice cultivated under induced Cd stress conditions were evaluated and results presented in Table3. Cadmium toxicity greatly affected rice quality attributes in all cultivars. Decreased protein content was observed in all the cultivars subjected under Cd stress conditions. With increased Cd toxic levels, protein contents were also found reduced. Reduction of protein contents in response to Cd stress was more severe in varieties 1 and 5 (V1 and V5) while minimum reduction was observed in varieties V3, V2, and V4. Higher values (13.29%) were recorded in cultivar V3 while the least values were recorded in cultivar V5. Amylose contents were also detected and significant differences were observed among treatments. A reduction in the amylose contents was observed as the Cd toxic levels increased. Cultivars V3, V2, and V4 were less affected when compared to cultivars V1 and V5, whose decrease in amylose contents was higher. Maximum contents of amylose were recorded in cultivars V3 and V2. Brown rice rate was also determined and the results showed significant differences among treatments. Higher values of brown rice rate were recorded in cultivar V3 while minimum values were recorded in cultivar V5. With induced soil Cd toxicity, percentage of brown rice was found reduced and maximum reduction was observed in cultivar V1 while minimum decrease was observed in cultivar V3. Milled rice percentage was also determined and significant decreases were observed among the treatments. Increase in soil Cd toxicity resulted in declined milled rice rate. Cultivar V3 exhibited higher milled rice values when compared to the other cultivars, while, cultivars V1 and V5 had lower values. The influence of Cd on milled rice rate greatly affected cultivars V1 and V5. Chalkiness is a significant rice quality character. Grains chalkiness was estimated and significant differences were observed among the treatments for all cultivars. As Cd toxicity increased, rice chalkiness reduced. Decline in grain quality shows that Cd has an effect on rice grain quality attributes and the level of toxicity greatly affected quality traits.Table 3
Grain quality attributes as influenced by Cd toxicity.
Variety
Treatment
Protein content (%)
Amylose content (%)
Brown rice rate (%)
Milled rice rate (%)
Grains with chalkiness (%)
Chalkiness degree (%)
V1
Cd0
11.97 ± 0.19a
18.02 ± 0.33a
74.10 ± 1.08a
59.17 ± 0.22a
9.66 ± 0.33a
0.18 ± 0.02a
Cd1
8.123 ± 0.12b
16.44 ± 0.15b
72.86 ± 0.316a
56.20 ± 0.38b
8.00 ± 0.00b
0.4 ± 0.09b
Cd2
7.34 ± 0.07c
15.33 ± 0.27c
69.47 ± 0.41b
53.46 ± 0.15c
8.33 ± 0.33b
0.69 ± 0.04c
Cd3
4.75 ± 0.18d
12.94 ± 0.40d
64.77 ± 0.44c
44.27 ± 0.15d
6.00 ± 0.00c
0.91 ± 0.03d
V2
Cd0
11.39 ± 0.03a
20.19 ± 0.07a
68.79 ± 0.33a
57.81 ± 0.34a
11.66 ± 0.33a
0.17 ± 3.33a
Cd1
10.15 ± 0.19b
19.15 ± 0.15b
68.02 ± 0.28ab
55.76 ± 0.36b
10.33 ± 0.33b
0.25 ± 0.01b
Cd2
9.21 ± 0.25c
16.7 ± 0.08c
67.71 ± 0.33b
54.21 ± 0.34c
9.33 ± 0.33c
0.47 ± 0.03c
Cd3
5.93 ± 0.21d
14.01 ± 0.24d
66.29 ± 0.22c
51.02 ± 0.29d
8.0 ± 0.00d
0.58 ± 8.81d
V3
Cd0
13.29 ± 0.12a
20.40 ± 0.06a
84.65 ± 0.06a
65.12 ± 0.18a
7.67 ± 0.33a
0.05 ± 3.33a
Cd1
12.99 ± 0.11a
19.30 ± 0.06b
84.51 ± 0.67a
64.10 ± 0.38ab
7.33 ± 0.33a
0.11 ± 8.82b
Cd2
12.44 ± 0.05b
18.41 ± 0.08c
84.047 ± 0.29a
63.02 ± 0.67b
7.00 ± 0.0ab
0.17 ± 0.02c
Cd3
11.04 ± 0.13c
16.68 ± 0.29d
82.71 ± 0.28b
59.35 ± 0.28c
6.33 ± 0.33b
0.22 ± 5.77d
V4
Cd0
9.21 ± 0.14a
15.79 ± 0.16a
73.05 ± 0.31a
55.55 ± 0.69a
9.00 ± 0.00a
0.08 ± 5.77a
Cd1
8.74 ± 0.31a
14.94 ± 0.39b
72.18 ± 0.21a
54.05 ± 0.30b
8.66 ± 0.33a
0.11 ± 8.819b
Cd2
7.07 ± 0.38b
13.37 ± 0.25c
70.78 ± 0.34b
51.69 ± 0.27c
6.33 ± 0.33b
0.23 ± 5.77c
Cd3
5.12 ± 0.116c
11.84 ± 0.03d
68.53 ± 0.28c
49.88 ± 0.31d
4.66 ± 0.33c
0.37 ± 0.01c
V5
Cd0
8.45 ± 0.12a
18.49 ± 0.04a
64.32 ± 0.379a
61.59 ± 0.12a
7.67 ± 0.33a
0.08 ± 5.77a
Cd1
6.22 ± 0.17b
17.18 ± 0.16b
62.29 ± 0.09b
58.87 ± 0.40b
7.33 ± 0.33a
0.15 ± 0.01a
Cd2
5.55 ± 0.16c
15.74 ± 0.04c
60.30 ± 0.08c
55.15 ± 0.42c
5.33 ± 0.33b
0.37 ± 0.03a
Cd3
4.4 ± 0.119d
13.08 ± 0.15d
54.43 ± 0.63d
52.57 ± 0.159d
4.33 ± 0.33b
3.72 ± 3.02a
Three replicated means (±SE) were calculated for each treatment. Values with different letters are significantly different atP<0.05. Vn = variety n, Cd0 = 0 mg Cd/kg, Cd1 = 50 mg Cd/kg, Cd2 = 100 mg Cd/kg, and Cd3 = 150 mg Cd/kg.


## 3.1. Cadmium Uptake and Distribution in Different Rice Organs at Heading Stage (ug g−1)

Cd accumulation and distribution in roots, stem, leaves, and grains for all the five cultivars were determined at panicle heading and maturity stages and results presented in Figures1 and 2. The results revealed significant differences in Cd uptake among treatments of the same cultivars. Uptake was found increased in dose dependent manner. With increased soil Cd toxicity, Cd uptake in rice plant parts also increased. At panicle heading stage, Cd uptake was found higher in roots and then stems and less accumulation was observed in leaves. In terms of cultivars ability to accumulate Cd, cultivar 3 accumulated more Cd in roots and less in stems and leaves, while cultivar 1 accumulated less Cd in roots and maximum in above-plant parts. Though variation in Cd uptake among the five rice cultivars existed, accumulation differs in Cd concentrations among the different rice organs of the same plant. The trend of Cd uptake and distribution showed that root accumulated maximum Cd contents followed by shoots and leaves. The accumulated Cd contents in roots were higher than shoots and leaves in all cultivars. Hence, lower Cd content in roots of some cultivars with higher Cd in the stems and leaves and, in other cultivars, higher Cd content in roots with lower Cd in the stems and leaves indicated the roots ability to uptake maximum and minimum Cd from the soil and translocate less or more to the stems and leaves. Although greater differences exist in root Cd accumulation, these differences were found smaller in shoots and leaves. Overall, the values of Cd concentrations in shoots were greatest in Meixiangzhan 2 (V1) compared to the other rice cultivars (Figures 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c)).Figure 1
Cd uptake in (a) roots, (b) stems, and (c) leaves of the five different rice cultivars under induced Cd stress at panicle heading stage. The values are representative of three replicated means per treatment ± SE. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments atP≤0.05, LSD.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 2
Cd accumulation in (a) roots, (b) stems, (c) leaves, and (d) grains of the five different rice cultivars under induced Cd stress at maturity stage. The values are representative of three replicated means per treatment ±SE. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments atP≤0.05, LSD.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)During maturity stage (Figures2(a), 2(b), 2(c), and 2(d)), similar trend in Cd uptake was also observed in all cultivars and organs of the same plant as in panicle heading stage. With increased level of Cd induced in the soil, Cd uptake in roots, stems, leaves, and grains was found elevated. Cd uptake was found higher in roots and lower in above-ground plants part with V3 and V2 cultivars accumulating more Cd in roots and less in shoots and grains compared to the other cultivars, while cultivars v1 and v5 accumulated less Cd in roots and higher in shoots and grains. This can be as a result of cultivars tolerance or sensitive ability in uptaking and translocating Cd to plant parts under Cd stress conditions.


## 3.2. Translocation Factor (TF) of Cd Contents between Organs of the Five Different Rice Cultivars at Panicle Heading and Maturity Stages

Cd translocation factors from roots to stems, stems to leaves, and leaves to grains were computed and presented in Table1. Translocation factor varies during the panicle heading and maturity stages. The values were found higher in stems to leaves transference than roots to stems at all levels of Cd treatments. Across cultivars, highest values for Cd translocation from roots to shoots and from shoots to leaves were noticed in varieties 3, 4, and 2 respectively, while translocation from roots to shoots and grain in cultivars v3 and v2 was minimal compared to the other cultivars; this is as a result of the cultivars ability to accumulate maximum Cd in roots and transfer less to shoots.Table 1
Translocation factor (TF) of Cd contents between organs of the five different rice cultivars at panicle heading and maturity stages.
Variety
Treatment
Panicle heading stage
Maturity stage
Roots-stemsTF
Stems- leavesTF
Roots-stemsTF
Stems- leavesTF
Leaves-grainsTF
V1
Cd0
0.552
0.435
0.605
0.846
0.114
Cd1
0.167
0.336
0.442
0.278
0.305
Cd2
0.140
0.495
0.539
0.307
0.318
Cd3
0.143
0.420
0.597
0.367
0.413
V2
Cd0
0.641
0.590
0.573
0.759
0.092
Cd1
0.235
0.308
0.186
0.384
0.181
Cd2
0.237
0.313
0.185
0.360
0.494
Cd3
0.221
0.289
0.173
0.309
0.514
V3
Cd0
0.691
0.572
0.611
0.904
0.062
Cd1
0.197
0.396
0.191
0.738
0.225
Cd2
0.316
0.254
0.323
0.407
0.331
Cd3
0.339
0.253
0.396
0.320
0.343
V4
Cd0
0.567
0.403
0.369
0.893
0.112
Cd1
0.384
0.452
0.370
0.425
0.328
Cd2
0.207
0.600
0.268
0.424
0.437
Cd3
0.181
0.757
0.234
0.355
0.568
V5
Cd0
0.494
0.659
0.487
0.687
0.132
Cd1
0.192
0.369
0.280
0.502
0.318
Cd2
0.191
0.468
0.259
0.419
0.533
Cd3
0.220
0.670
0.321
0.426
0.402
V
n = variety n, Cd0 = 0 mg Cd/kg, Cd1 = 50 mg Cd/kg, Cd2 = 100 mg Cd/kg, and Cd3 = 150 mg Cd/kg.


## 3.3. Effects of Cadmium on Yield and Its Parameters

Yield and yield related parameters were determined after entire rice was harvested and the results are shown in Table2. There was a variation in yield and its parameters for all cultivars and treatments of the same cultivars. In terms of cultivars performance, maximum number of panicles, spikelet per panicle, 1000 grains’ weight, seed setting, and grain yield were observed in cultivar 3 (V3), followed by cultivar 1 (V1), while minimum number of panicles, spikelet per panicle, 1000 grains’ weight, seed setting, and grain yield were observed in cultivar 5 (V5) and cultivar 2 (V2). This shows cultivars performance variation when subjected to the same conditions and agronomic practices. On treatments bases, variation in number of panicles, spikelet per panicle, 1000 grains’ weight, seed setting, and grain yield among treatments were dose dependent. With increased level of soil Cd toxicity, number of panicles per pot, spikelet per panicle, 1000 grains’ weight, seed setting, and grain yield decreased. For grain yield, when compared to control 34.37, 43.25, and 63.85% yield decrease were observed in Cd 1, 2, and 3 for cultivar 1 (V1), 9.57, 31.09, and 39.02% for cultivar 2 (V2), 10.82, 23.51, and 39.95% for cultivar 3 (V3), 12.43, 22.66, and 31.33% for cultivar 4 (V4), and 29.14, 46.16, and 47.66% for cultivar 5 (V5). With the trend shown above, yield decreased as Cd toxicity levels increased and cultivars 1 and 5 showed maximum yield decrease while cultivars 2, 3, and 4 showed minimal yield decrease. This indicated the toxic consequences of Cd on rice yield.Table 2
Effects of cadmium on yield and its parameters.
Variety
Treatment
Panicles/pot
Spikelet number/pot
100-grain weight (g)
Seed setting rate (%)
Grain yield/pot (g)
V1
Cd0
30.33 ± 0.33a
121.07 ± 0.58bc
23.97 ± 0.33a
89.1 ± 0.11a
78.44 ± 1.40a
Cd1
23.66 ± 0.88b
127.52 ± 3.88b
19.88 ± 0.38b
85.963 ± 1.45b
51.48 ± 1.61b
Cd2
20.00 ± 0.57c
142.34 ± 2.87a
19.03 ± 0.32bc
82.293 ± 0.74c
44.51 ± 0.48c
Cd3
17.33 ± 0.88d
113.63 ± 5.25c
18.1 ± 0.11c
79.92 ± 0.45c
28.35 ± 0.05d
V2
Cd0
27.67 ± 0.33a
116.35 ± 2.46c
23.60 ± 0.28a
92.32 ± 0.84a
70.12 ± 1.60a
Cd1
25.33 ± 0.33b
132.01 ± 2.39ab
21.55 ± 0.17b
87.86 ± 1.49b
63.41 ± 2.69b
Cd2
23.66 ± 0.33c
123.49 ± 2.58bc
19.05 ± 0.47c
86.883 ± 0.32b
48.31 ± 0.66c
Cd3
20.33 ± 0.66d
140.32 ± 7.90a
18.63 ± 0.19c
80.697 ± 1.15c
42.75 ± 1.38c
V3
Cd0
32.33 ± 0.33a
113.11 ± 2.03a
24.98 ± 0.24a
93.79 ± 0.72a
85.63 ± 1.01a
Cd1
31.66 ± 0.33a
111.66 ± 0.70a
24.03 ± 0.12ab
89.90 ± 0.25b
76.37 ± 0.19b
Cd2
28.67 ± 0.33b
110.93 ± 0.14a
23.38 ± 0.47bc
88.12 ± 0.42c
65.5 ± 0.73c
Cd3
26.66 ± 0.33c
98.58 ± 2.15b
22.66 ± 0.33c
86.22 ± 0.43d
51.42 ± 2.10d
V4
Cd0
25.66 ± 0.33a
131.33 ± 3.60b
22.44 ± 0.67a
90.29 ± 0.96a
68.37 ± 3.59a
Cd1
23.33 ± 0.33b
139.15 ± 1.73ab
21.05 ± 0.49ab
87.67 ± 1.03a
59.87 ± 1.46b
Cd2
21.66 ± 0.33c
148.57 ± 6.18a
19.66 ± 0.22bc
83.54 ± 0.74b
52.87 ± 2.43bc
Cd3
19.66 ± 0.33d
150.92 ± 3.72a
19.30 ± 0.60c
81.99 ± 0.47b
46.95 ± 1.73c
V5
Cd0
27.66 ± 0.33a
130.58 ± 0.53ab
24.04 ± 0.50a
89.70 ± 0.55a
77.9 ± 1.43a
Cd1
25 ± 0.5774b
117.65 ± 0.60bc
23.44 ± 0.10a
80.05 ± 0.77b
55.19 ± 1.42b
Cd2
24.33 ± 0.66b
103.53 ± 11.81c
21.83 ± 0.56b
77.13 ± 3.54b
41.94 ± 3.22c
Cd3
18.33 ± 0.66c
147.21 ± 4.34a
19.65 ± 0.21c
76.98 ± 1.52b
40.77 ± 1.36c
Three replicated means (±SE) were calculated for each treatment. Values with different letters are significantly different atP<0.05. Vn = variety n, Cd0 = 0 mg Cd/kg, Cd1 = 50 mg Cd/kg, Cd2 = 100 mg Cd/kg, and Cd3 = 150 mg Cd/kg.


## 3.4. Grain Quality Attributes as Influenced by Cd Toxicity

Aromatic rice quality attributes are a significant aspect in rice cultivation and production due to the high price it commands in the market and its desirability by many customers. Hence, quality attributes of fragrant rice cultivated under induced Cd stress conditions were evaluated and results presented in Table3. Cadmium toxicity greatly affected rice quality attributes in all cultivars. Decreased protein content was observed in all the cultivars subjected under Cd stress conditions. With increased Cd toxic levels, protein contents were also found reduced. Reduction of protein contents in response to Cd stress was more severe in varieties 1 and 5 (V1 and V5) while minimum reduction was observed in varieties V3, V2, and V4. Higher values (13.29%) were recorded in cultivar V3 while the least values were recorded in cultivar V5. Amylose contents were also detected and significant differences were observed among treatments. A reduction in the amylose contents was observed as the Cd toxic levels increased. Cultivars V3, V2, and V4 were less affected when compared to cultivars V1 and V5, whose decrease in amylose contents was higher. Maximum contents of amylose were recorded in cultivars V3 and V2. Brown rice rate was also determined and the results showed significant differences among treatments. Higher values of brown rice rate were recorded in cultivar V3 while minimum values were recorded in cultivar V5. With induced soil Cd toxicity, percentage of brown rice was found reduced and maximum reduction was observed in cultivar V1 while minimum decrease was observed in cultivar V3. Milled rice percentage was also determined and significant decreases were observed among the treatments. Increase in soil Cd toxicity resulted in declined milled rice rate. Cultivar V3 exhibited higher milled rice values when compared to the other cultivars, while, cultivars V1 and V5 had lower values. The influence of Cd on milled rice rate greatly affected cultivars V1 and V5. Chalkiness is a significant rice quality character. Grains chalkiness was estimated and significant differences were observed among the treatments for all cultivars. As Cd toxicity increased, rice chalkiness reduced. Decline in grain quality shows that Cd has an effect on rice grain quality attributes and the level of toxicity greatly affected quality traits.Table 3
Grain quality attributes as influenced by Cd toxicity.
Variety
Treatment
Protein content (%)
Amylose content (%)
Brown rice rate (%)
Milled rice rate (%)
Grains with chalkiness (%)
Chalkiness degree (%)
V1
Cd0
11.97 ± 0.19a
18.02 ± 0.33a
74.10 ± 1.08a
59.17 ± 0.22a
9.66 ± 0.33a
0.18 ± 0.02a
Cd1
8.123 ± 0.12b
16.44 ± 0.15b
72.86 ± 0.316a
56.20 ± 0.38b
8.00 ± 0.00b
0.4 ± 0.09b
Cd2
7.34 ± 0.07c
15.33 ± 0.27c
69.47 ± 0.41b
53.46 ± 0.15c
8.33 ± 0.33b
0.69 ± 0.04c
Cd3
4.75 ± 0.18d
12.94 ± 0.40d
64.77 ± 0.44c
44.27 ± 0.15d
6.00 ± 0.00c
0.91 ± 0.03d
V2
Cd0
11.39 ± 0.03a
20.19 ± 0.07a
68.79 ± 0.33a
57.81 ± 0.34a
11.66 ± 0.33a
0.17 ± 3.33a
Cd1
10.15 ± 0.19b
19.15 ± 0.15b
68.02 ± 0.28ab
55.76 ± 0.36b
10.33 ± 0.33b
0.25 ± 0.01b
Cd2
9.21 ± 0.25c
16.7 ± 0.08c
67.71 ± 0.33b
54.21 ± 0.34c
9.33 ± 0.33c
0.47 ± 0.03c
Cd3
5.93 ± 0.21d
14.01 ± 0.24d
66.29 ± 0.22c
51.02 ± 0.29d
8.0 ± 0.00d
0.58 ± 8.81d
V3
Cd0
13.29 ± 0.12a
20.40 ± 0.06a
84.65 ± 0.06a
65.12 ± 0.18a
7.67 ± 0.33a
0.05 ± 3.33a
Cd1
12.99 ± 0.11a
19.30 ± 0.06b
84.51 ± 0.67a
64.10 ± 0.38ab
7.33 ± 0.33a
0.11 ± 8.82b
Cd2
12.44 ± 0.05b
18.41 ± 0.08c
84.047 ± 0.29a
63.02 ± 0.67b
7.00 ± 0.0ab
0.17 ± 0.02c
Cd3
11.04 ± 0.13c
16.68 ± 0.29d
82.71 ± 0.28b
59.35 ± 0.28c
6.33 ± 0.33b
0.22 ± 5.77d
V4
Cd0
9.21 ± 0.14a
15.79 ± 0.16a
73.05 ± 0.31a
55.55 ± 0.69a
9.00 ± 0.00a
0.08 ± 5.77a
Cd1
8.74 ± 0.31a
14.94 ± 0.39b
72.18 ± 0.21a
54.05 ± 0.30b
8.66 ± 0.33a
0.11 ± 8.819b
Cd2
7.07 ± 0.38b
13.37 ± 0.25c
70.78 ± 0.34b
51.69 ± 0.27c
6.33 ± 0.33b
0.23 ± 5.77c
Cd3
5.12 ± 0.116c
11.84 ± 0.03d
68.53 ± 0.28c
49.88 ± 0.31d
4.66 ± 0.33c
0.37 ± 0.01c
V5
Cd0
8.45 ± 0.12a
18.49 ± 0.04a
64.32 ± 0.379a
61.59 ± 0.12a
7.67 ± 0.33a
0.08 ± 5.77a
Cd1
6.22 ± 0.17b
17.18 ± 0.16b
62.29 ± 0.09b
58.87 ± 0.40b
7.33 ± 0.33a
0.15 ± 0.01a
Cd2
5.55 ± 0.16c
15.74 ± 0.04c
60.30 ± 0.08c
55.15 ± 0.42c
5.33 ± 0.33b
0.37 ± 0.03a
Cd3
4.4 ± 0.119d
13.08 ± 0.15d
54.43 ± 0.63d
52.57 ± 0.159d
4.33 ± 0.33b
3.72 ± 3.02a
Three replicated means (±SE) were calculated for each treatment. Values with different letters are significantly different atP<0.05. Vn = variety n, Cd0 = 0 mg Cd/kg, Cd1 = 50 mg Cd/kg, Cd2 = 100 mg Cd/kg, and Cd3 = 150 mg Cd/kg.


## 4. Discussion

Soil Cd contamination has tremendous effects on plants as it interferes with plant metabolism and, thus, negatively affects plant growth and development. Hence, Cd interaction with essential metals on uptake and distribution in crops is a public concern. In our experiment, the influence of cadmium toxicity on fragrant rice genotypes and its consequences on yield, yield related parameters, and grain quality were examined in five scented rice cultivars. Significant differences were observed in Cd uptake and distribution among cultivars. Cd uptake and accumulation in roots, stems, leaves, and grains were found higher in V1 and V5 cultivars compared to the other cultivars; this was probably as a result of the higher uptake and translocation ability of the cultivars to absorb Cd from the soil medium and subsequent translocation to roots and then to above-ground parts. The differences observed in accumulation may be related to the genotypic tolerance nature of the cultivars to cadmium toxicity. Cd uptake showed concentration dependent behavior in which maximum Cd speciation was high at higher Cd concentrations and low under lower Cd concentrations; this is often being influenced by the cultivars root oxidation abilities, root acidifications, and root organic acid secretions [13]. Genotypic variations of Cd tolerance in rice cultivars have been reported in which Cd uptake and translocation from contaminated soil to plants edible parts were markedly different among plant species as well as cultivars within the same species [16].For all treatments and cultivars, the distribution ratios of Cd concentration in rice organs followed root > stem > leaves > grains. These differences in Cd concentrations may arise from the variation of Cd uptake and translocation ability of cultivar type. In similar studies, marked positive correlations in Cd concentrations were reported between the rice roots, stems leaves, and grains [17], and marked linear correlations between Cd concentrations in rice grains and straws/roots Cd concentrations (P<0.01) were also shown [18, 19]. The results in our study further illustrated variations in Cd uptake and translocation among the five cultivars as well as organs of the same cultivar. Rice cultivars with high affinity for soil Cd responded to high levels of soil Cd by partitioning a greater proportion of total plant Cd in roots and above-plant parts. The variation of grain Cd concentration in our experiment depended on root Cd uptake by rice cultivars and then translocation to above-rice part, particularly shoot to grain translocation. [20], concluded that Cd translocation from root to shoot via the xylem flow was the main physiological process that determined Cd accumulation in rice shoots and grains. This suggested that exceeding Cd translocation from root to shoot via xylem flow led to higher Cd accumulation in vegetative tissues (“source” organ), as well as higher Cd content transported to grains (“sink” organ) via the phloem. Our results showed that Cd accumulation in rice organs was aided by physiological processes and genetic expressions; hence, maximum Cd retention in roots with less translocation to shoots forms an important mechanism in Cd tolerance. The ability of cultivar to retain Cd in roots can contribute to reduced accumulation of Cd in grain which is of great significant to human health. As indicated above, cultivars v3 and v2 seem to have higher capacity to accumulate Cd in roots and less in grains. Rice quality traits to a larger extent do depend on rice plant external environmental conditions including both biotic and abiotic stresses, cultivar genetic makeup, and crop agronomic and management practices employed during growth and in storage. Cd toxicity affected rice quality attributes including grain protein, amylose contents, brown rice accumulation, milled rice percentage, chalkiness %, and chalkiness area. With increased level of Cd toxicity, brown rice accumulation as well as chalkiness % and chalkiness area increased, while grain protein, amylose contents, and milled rice rate decreased. These effects were found concentration dependent and cultivar-specific.


## 5. Conclusion

This study was carried out to examine the influence of cadmium toxicity on fragrant rice genotypes and its consequences on yield, yield related parameters, and grain quality traits. Cd uptake, translocation, and speciation in different plant parts were found to be genotype-specific and concentration dependent. Differences existed in Cd absorption, distribution, and accumulation among rice cultivars. Our results further demonstrated that Guixiangzhan cultivar retained more Cd in roots and less in grains which is more significant to humans. Rice yield and grain quality were also found reduced with increased toxicity level. The overall performance in terms of minimum Cd uptake and distribution to grain, yield, and grain quality reduction for all the rice cultivars under Cd stress were recorded as V3 > V2 > V4 > V5 > V1.



---

*Source: 1405878-2017-05-29.xml*