# The Transmittance, Transmittance Wavefront, and Laser Induced Damage Properties of Thin Fluoride Polymer Films May Be Used as Short Pulse Laser Debris Shields

Authors: Shufan Chen; Chuanqun Huang; Xiaodong Jiang; Xuan Luo; Yu Fang; Weidong Wu
Journal: International Journal of Polymer Science
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Debris mitigation which pollutes and even damages the optical elements is a major challenge for all high-peak-power lasers system. In order to solve the problem, we employed some preliminary research. In this work, first, the film optical properties of fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), perfluoroalkoxy copolymer (PFA), and ethane-tetrafluoroethylene copolymer (ETFE) were investigated with respect to their possible application as laser debris shields. The results indicate that three of the polymer films have high transmittance at 355 nm, especially in FEP film, the transmittance of which at 355 nm is near to 94%. The transmittance wavefront and the laser that induce damage of FEP film were investigated further. The result indicates that the wavefront error of FEP film (with a diameter of 90 mm) is about 0.33λ. The damage test was performed by a 355 nm neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser with a 9.3 ns pulse duration, and it was found that the highest nondamage fluence for FEP film is 10.35 J/cm2. Through a demonstration experiment, it was testified that the FEP film can prevent large amount of metal fractions and the FEP film can be used as the debris shields indeed.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In inertial confinement fusion (ICF) experiments, when the target is bombarded by laser, amount of target debris will be generated. The laser target debris is consisting of a small amount of metal vapor, droplets of liquid metal, and massive solid projectiles. This debris will pollute and even damage the optical elements. To protect against these various classes of debris, a multielement approach has been adopted [1–3]. First, use self-closing nose cone to prevent the debris from going into the beam path; second, use a pneumatic fast valve to prevent the large and low speed fraction; third, use a thin polymer film debris shield to replace the traditional fused silica antireflection (AR) coated window to prevent almost all debris. The third method is effective, inexpensive, and convenient, and the using of polymer film can avoid the self-phase modulation, self-focusing, and beam breakup of the traditional silica window [4–6]. According to the report of Sandia [1], nitrocellulose, Mylar, and polyimide were investigated, and finally it was found that the nitrocellulose has the best properties. According to the criterion of the polymer films which begin to turn up large scale of holes, the highest nondamage fluence for nitrocellulose was 11.5 J/cm2. The nitrocellulose film has been used as the short pulse laser debris shields. A 43.2 cm diameter pellicle is now being fabricated for first Petawatt backlighting experiments on the Z-Accelerator.Even the researchers of Sandia have done excellent work on the polymer film debris shield, but they only care about the Z-Petawatt FOA with the working wavelength of 1054 nm. The polymer film can be used at 1054 nm, but it is inapplicable to National Ignition Facility (NIF) for the working wavelength of which tripled laser is about 355 nm and the three kinds of polymer film including nitrocellulose, Mylar, and polyimide all have obvious absorption at 355 nm. In order to provide the available material for the future NIF, our work aims at the laser of 355 nm wavelength. The main difficulty is the high damage possibility of polymers at 355 nm wavelength. Besides, the reflection of the film and the laser transmission wavefront distortion have to be considered. Furthermore, the polymer film should have mechanical rigidity to withstand small debris [1, 7–10]. Based on this, fluoride polymers were investigated with respect to their optical and spectral transmission quality, absorption, stress induced birefringence, and damage threshold [11, 12].In our research, three kinds of fluoride polymer films including fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), perfluoroalkoxy copolymer (PFA), and ethane-tetrafluoroethylene copolymer (ETFE) which have superior mechanical property and low absorption at 355 nm were investigated. Some preliminary results were achieved.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Sample Preparation

Three kinds of thin films (fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), perfluoroalkoxy copolymer (PFA), and ethane-tetrafluoroethylene copolymer (ETFE)) were ultrasonic cleaned first in alcohol and then in hexane solution; the cleaning time is about 10 min. And then, the films were swept by high purity nitrogen gas (99.99%). The cleaned films were fixed by an embroidery frame and were characterized.


### 2.2. Sample Characterization

The transmittance of films was characterized by UV-3010 spectrophotometer (Japan) at room temperature ranging within 300 nm~800 nm.Wavefront transmission characteristics were measured using a 4′′ interferometer from 4D-Technologies (FizCam 1500) operating at a wavelength of 632.8 nm. The debris shield was placed between the interferometer and a reference mirror with a peak-to-valley (PV) wavefront quality <λ/20. The wavefront upon reflection from this reference flat was measured and later subtracted from the measurement of the double pass transmission through the thin film, vertical polarization at a constant probe wavelength of 632.8 nm.Damage testing was performed using a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser at 355 nm with a 9.3 ns pulse duration.


## 2.1. Sample Preparation

Three kinds of thin films (fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), perfluoroalkoxy copolymer (PFA), and ethane-tetrafluoroethylene copolymer (ETFE)) were ultrasonic cleaned first in alcohol and then in hexane solution; the cleaning time is about 10 min. And then, the films were swept by high purity nitrogen gas (99.99%). The cleaned films were fixed by an embroidery frame and were characterized.


## 2.2. Sample Characterization

The transmittance of films was characterized by UV-3010 spectrophotometer (Japan) at room temperature ranging within 300 nm~800 nm.Wavefront transmission characteristics were measured using a 4′′ interferometer from 4D-Technologies (FizCam 1500) operating at a wavelength of 632.8 nm. The debris shield was placed between the interferometer and a reference mirror with a peak-to-valley (PV) wavefront quality <λ/20. The wavefront upon reflection from this reference flat was measured and later subtracted from the measurement of the double pass transmission through the thin film, vertical polarization at a constant probe wavelength of 632.8 nm.Damage testing was performed using a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser at 355 nm with a 9.3 ns pulse duration.


## 3. Result and Discussion

### 3.1. UV-Vis Spectra Analysis of the Three Kinds of Fluoride Polymer Films

Figure1(a) shows the transmittance of the three kinds of fluoride polymer films. It can be observed from Figure 1(a) that the three of the polymer films have high transmittance at 355 nm; especially in FEP film, the transmittance at 355 nm is near to 94% (93.86%). Because the transmittance of FEP film at 355 nm is the highest in the three kinds of fluoride polymer films, the properties of FEP film were further investigated, but no further studies have been performed on PFA and ETFE films. Figure 1(b) shows the reflectance curve of FEP film; according to the result we can get the double faced reflectance of FEP film at 355 nm which is about 5.85%, and according to the following equations, the single face reflectance and refractive index of FEP film can be calculated:(1)
A
=
1
-
T
-
R
,where A is the absorption of FEP film at 355 nm; T and R are the measured transmittance and reflectance of FEP film at 355 nm.Figure 1
(a) Transmittance and (b) reflectance of the three kinds of fluoride polymer films range from 300 nm to 800 nm.
(a)
(b)Presuming that the single faced transmittance and reflectance of FEP film at 355 nm areT
1 and R
1, respectively, (3) can be obtained. Quadratic term was omitted; (4) and (5) can be obtained:(2)
T
1
=
1
-
R
1
,
(3)
T
=
T
1
2
1
-
A
1
-
R
1
2
1
-
2
A
,
(4)
T
=
1
-
R
1
2
1
-
A
,
(5)
R
1
=
1
-
T
1
-
A
0.5
.Finally, the single faced reflectanceR
1 of FEP film was worked out as 3.004%.According to the relation between reflectance and refractive index (6), the refractive index 1.419 of FEP film at 355 nm was obtained:(6)
R
1
=
n
-
1
2
n
+
1
2
,where n is the refractive index of FEP film at 355 nm; 1 is the refractive index of atmosphere.According to the above analysis, transmittance of FEP film at 355 nm is 93.86%, and the total transmittance loss of 6.14% consists of 5.85% double faced reflectance and 0.29% absorption of polymer film along with the surface scattering. The result indicates that, through decreasing the reflectivity of polymer FEP film, the transmittance of the film can be obviously improved. The FEP film was prepared to optical element; the morphology of FEP film was shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Photograph of polymer FEP film with the diameter of 90 mm.


### 3.2. Results of Wavefront Transmission Characteristics

Figure3 shows the wavefront error caused by the double pass transmission of a 90 mm diameter laser beam through FEP film. The measured wavefront distortion (PV) is 0.33λ; the root mean square (RMS) deviation from a perfectly flat wavefront is 0.068λ.Figure 3
Wavefront distortion after a double pass through FEP film: (a) the aerial view and (b) the three-dimensional graph.
(a)
(b)


### 3.3. Laser Induced Damage Testing

The laser induced damage was deeply investigated. The damage test was performed with a 355 nm neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser with a 9.3 ns pulse duration. We found that the laser induced damage of the fluoride polymer film can be divided into three processes (Figure4). First process: when the laser energy density is lower than certain value, the film has no change. Second process: when the laser energy density increased to certain range, the structure of polymer film begins to change and the glow spots turn up, but no obvious holes can be observed (some small pinpoint may be observed with microscopy). Third process: when the laser energy further increased to certain value, there are obvious holes that can be observed on the film. We define the three processes as no-change process, property changing process, and obvious holes turning up process. The testing results of the highest laser fluence of each process are shown in Figure 5.Figure 4
Morphologies of laser induced damage on FEP film.Figure 5
Damage test results for FEP film: (a) property changes probability (second process) and (b) holes turn up probability (third process).
(a)
(b)According to the results of Figure5, it can be calculated that the highest laser fluence of first process is 3.35 J/cm2, and the highest laser fluence of second process is 10.35 J/cm2. It means that when the laser energy density is lower than 3.35 J/cm2, the film has no changes after the laser breaks through; when the laser energy density is within 3.35
J
/
c
m
2~10
.
35
J
/
c
m
2, the structure of polymer film will change, but no obvious holes can be observed; when the laser energy density is higher than 10.35 J/cm2, obvious holes will turn up on the film.We are afraid that the structure change of film will influence the transmission of laser, so we investigated the dynamic transmittance of laser with different energy density through the film during the three processes. We used the laser with different energy density (I
0) breaking through the film and measured the energy density (I
1) of the laser after it gets through the film at the same time; the result of I
0 divided by I
1 is the dynamic transmittance of film. The result indicates that the dynamic transmittances of the three processes all are about 89%. It testifies that when the laser energy density is higher than 3.35 J/cm2, even the structure of polymer film changes, but before that, the laser has got through the polymer film, so the structure change has no influence on the laser transmission.According to Sandia’s report [1], the main purpose of the debris shield is to prevent debris vapor and fractions from being deposited on the final focusing parabola: in that respect one can tolerate small scale holes. Therefore, when the laser energy density is within 3.35
J
/
c
m
2~10
.
35
J
/
c
m
2, even if there are some small pinpoints that turn up on the film (property changing process), the FEP film still can be used as the debris shield also. In other words, the highest nondamage fluence for FEP film is 10.35 J/cm2.The microscopic-morphologies of laser induced damage on FEP film were characterized and shown in Figure6. It can be observed from Figure 6(a) that when the laser energy density is within 3.35
J
/
c
m
2~10
.
35
J
/
c
m
2, the film becomes blushing after the laser passes through, and some small pinpoints can be observed under the microscope. From Figure 6(b), it can be observed that when the laser energy density is higher than 10.35 J/cm2, obvious holes can be observed on the laser damaged film. Under this condition, the films cannot be used as debris shields.Figure 6
Microscopic-morphologies of laser induced damage: (a) the laser energy density within3.35
J
/
c
m
2~10
.
35
J
/
c
m
2 (second process) and (b) the laser energy density higher than 10.35 J/cm2 (third process).
(a)
(b)


### 3.4. Demonstration Experiment of the FEP Film Was Used as the Debris Shield

In order to verify whether the polymer film can prevent the debris, we had performed a demonstration experiment (Figure7). Same as the damage test, the experiment was performed with a 355 nm neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser with a 9.3 ns pulse duration, the laser energy is 8.23 J/cm2, and the diameter of the focal spot is about 2 mm. The FEP film was put into the laser beam path before a steel panel, and the distance of FEP film to steel panel is about 10 cm; then the laser was used to bombard the steel panel and the distance between focal spot and steel panel is about 50 cm. Finally, the FEP film was observed by microscope and the result indicates that a large amount of steel fractions was observed on the FEP film (Figure 8) and demonstrates that the FEP film can prevent the debris from getting into the laser path indeed.Figure 7
FEP film was used as debris shields.Figure 8
Microscopic-morphologies of FEP film after it was used as debris shields.


## 3.1. UV-Vis Spectra Analysis of the Three Kinds of Fluoride Polymer Films

Figure1(a) shows the transmittance of the three kinds of fluoride polymer films. It can be observed from Figure 1(a) that the three of the polymer films have high transmittance at 355 nm; especially in FEP film, the transmittance at 355 nm is near to 94% (93.86%). Because the transmittance of FEP film at 355 nm is the highest in the three kinds of fluoride polymer films, the properties of FEP film were further investigated, but no further studies have been performed on PFA and ETFE films. Figure 1(b) shows the reflectance curve of FEP film; according to the result we can get the double faced reflectance of FEP film at 355 nm which is about 5.85%, and according to the following equations, the single face reflectance and refractive index of FEP film can be calculated:(1)
A
=
1
-
T
-
R
,where A is the absorption of FEP film at 355 nm; T and R are the measured transmittance and reflectance of FEP film at 355 nm.Figure 1
(a) Transmittance and (b) reflectance of the three kinds of fluoride polymer films range from 300 nm to 800 nm.
(a)
(b)Presuming that the single faced transmittance and reflectance of FEP film at 355 nm areT
1 and R
1, respectively, (3) can be obtained. Quadratic term was omitted; (4) and (5) can be obtained:(2)
T
1
=
1
-
R
1
,
(3)
T
=
T
1
2
1
-
A
1
-
R
1
2
1
-
2
A
,
(4)
T
=
1
-
R
1
2
1
-
A
,
(5)
R
1
=
1
-
T
1
-
A
0.5
.Finally, the single faced reflectanceR
1 of FEP film was worked out as 3.004%.According to the relation between reflectance and refractive index (6), the refractive index 1.419 of FEP film at 355 nm was obtained:(6)
R
1
=
n
-
1
2
n
+
1
2
,where n is the refractive index of FEP film at 355 nm; 1 is the refractive index of atmosphere.According to the above analysis, transmittance of FEP film at 355 nm is 93.86%, and the total transmittance loss of 6.14% consists of 5.85% double faced reflectance and 0.29% absorption of polymer film along with the surface scattering. The result indicates that, through decreasing the reflectivity of polymer FEP film, the transmittance of the film can be obviously improved. The FEP film was prepared to optical element; the morphology of FEP film was shown in Figure2.Figure 2
Photograph of polymer FEP film with the diameter of 90 mm.


## 3.2. Results of Wavefront Transmission Characteristics

Figure3 shows the wavefront error caused by the double pass transmission of a 90 mm diameter laser beam through FEP film. The measured wavefront distortion (PV) is 0.33λ; the root mean square (RMS) deviation from a perfectly flat wavefront is 0.068λ.Figure 3
Wavefront distortion after a double pass through FEP film: (a) the aerial view and (b) the three-dimensional graph.
(a)
(b)


## 3.3. Laser Induced Damage Testing

The laser induced damage was deeply investigated. The damage test was performed with a 355 nm neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser with a 9.3 ns pulse duration. We found that the laser induced damage of the fluoride polymer film can be divided into three processes (Figure4). First process: when the laser energy density is lower than certain value, the film has no change. Second process: when the laser energy density increased to certain range, the structure of polymer film begins to change and the glow spots turn up, but no obvious holes can be observed (some small pinpoint may be observed with microscopy). Third process: when the laser energy further increased to certain value, there are obvious holes that can be observed on the film. We define the three processes as no-change process, property changing process, and obvious holes turning up process. The testing results of the highest laser fluence of each process are shown in Figure 5.Figure 4
Morphologies of laser induced damage on FEP film.Figure 5
Damage test results for FEP film: (a) property changes probability (second process) and (b) holes turn up probability (third process).
(a)
(b)According to the results of Figure5, it can be calculated that the highest laser fluence of first process is 3.35 J/cm2, and the highest laser fluence of second process is 10.35 J/cm2. It means that when the laser energy density is lower than 3.35 J/cm2, the film has no changes after the laser breaks through; when the laser energy density is within 3.35
J
/
c
m
2~10
.
35
J
/
c
m
2, the structure of polymer film will change, but no obvious holes can be observed; when the laser energy density is higher than 10.35 J/cm2, obvious holes will turn up on the film.We are afraid that the structure change of film will influence the transmission of laser, so we investigated the dynamic transmittance of laser with different energy density through the film during the three processes. We used the laser with different energy density (I
0) breaking through the film and measured the energy density (I
1) of the laser after it gets through the film at the same time; the result of I
0 divided by I
1 is the dynamic transmittance of film. The result indicates that the dynamic transmittances of the three processes all are about 89%. It testifies that when the laser energy density is higher than 3.35 J/cm2, even the structure of polymer film changes, but before that, the laser has got through the polymer film, so the structure change has no influence on the laser transmission.According to Sandia’s report [1], the main purpose of the debris shield is to prevent debris vapor and fractions from being deposited on the final focusing parabola: in that respect one can tolerate small scale holes. Therefore, when the laser energy density is within 3.35
J
/
c
m
2~10
.
35
J
/
c
m
2, even if there are some small pinpoints that turn up on the film (property changing process), the FEP film still can be used as the debris shield also. In other words, the highest nondamage fluence for FEP film is 10.35 J/cm2.The microscopic-morphologies of laser induced damage on FEP film were characterized and shown in Figure6. It can be observed from Figure 6(a) that when the laser energy density is within 3.35
J
/
c
m
2~10
.
35
J
/
c
m
2, the film becomes blushing after the laser passes through, and some small pinpoints can be observed under the microscope. From Figure 6(b), it can be observed that when the laser energy density is higher than 10.35 J/cm2, obvious holes can be observed on the laser damaged film. Under this condition, the films cannot be used as debris shields.Figure 6
Microscopic-morphologies of laser induced damage: (a) the laser energy density within3.35
J
/
c
m
2~10
.
35
J
/
c
m
2 (second process) and (b) the laser energy density higher than 10.35 J/cm2 (third process).
(a)
(b)


## 3.4. Demonstration Experiment of the FEP Film Was Used as the Debris Shield

In order to verify whether the polymer film can prevent the debris, we had performed a demonstration experiment (Figure7). Same as the damage test, the experiment was performed with a 355 nm neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser with a 9.3 ns pulse duration, the laser energy is 8.23 J/cm2, and the diameter of the focal spot is about 2 mm. The FEP film was put into the laser beam path before a steel panel, and the distance of FEP film to steel panel is about 10 cm; then the laser was used to bombard the steel panel and the distance between focal spot and steel panel is about 50 cm. Finally, the FEP film was observed by microscope and the result indicates that a large amount of steel fractions was observed on the FEP film (Figure 8) and demonstrates that the FEP film can prevent the debris from getting into the laser path indeed.Figure 7
FEP film was used as debris shields.Figure 8
Microscopic-morphologies of FEP film after it was used as debris shields.


## 4. Conclusions

Optical properties of three kinds of fluoride polymer films FEP, PFA, and ETFE and the possibility of fluoride polymer film used as the debris shields were investigated. The results indicate that three of the polymer films have high transmittance at 355 nm, especially in FEP film, the transmittance of which at 355 nm is near to 94%. The transmittance loss of FEP film is mainly coming from the double faced reflectance, and through decreasing the reflectivity, the transmittance of this polymer film can be obviously enhanced. The laser induced damage on the fluoride polymer film can be divided into three processes, and the highest nondamage fluence for FEP film is 10.35 J/cm2. Through a demonstration experiment, we found that the FEP film can prevent large amount of metal fractions, it proves that the film can prevent the debris from getting into the laser pathway, and it can be used as the debris shields indeed.



---

*Source: 1367537-2016-05-12.xml*