# Silver Nanoparticles Obtained by Semicontinuous Chemical Reduction Using Carboxymethyl Cellulose as a Stabilizing Agent and Its Antibacterial Capacity

Authors: M. A. Pedroza-Toscano; S. López-Cuenca; M. Rabelero-Velasco; E. D. Moreno-Medrano; A. P. Mendizabal-Ruiz; R. Salazar-Peña
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Preparation of silver nanoparticles was carried out by semicontinuous reduction of Ag+ ions at low temperatures. Silver nitrate was used as the Ag0 precursor, the carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) as stabilizer and primary reducing agent, and sodium borohydride as reducing agent. Weight ratios of 1 : 1 and 1 : 2 of AgNO3 : CMC were used for carrying out the reactions. Silver nanoparticles were characterized by UV-VIS spectroscopy, transmission electronic microscopy (TEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The formation of silver nanoparticles was confirmed by XRD spectroscopy and by the presence of an absorption peak around 400 nm in the UV-visible spectrum. Unimodal size distributions of spheroidal nanoparticles were observed by TEM. Greater productivities than those reported by other authors were obtained with the advantage of using a lower temperature and minor reaction times. By using a higher CMC/AgNO3 weight ratio or a higher concentration of AgNO3, AgNPs with larger average size were produced. Antibacterial activity of AgNPs againstS. aureus andE. coli was determined by the agar disk diffusion method. The higher the AgNPs concentration, the larger the inhibition zone. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of AgNPs againstS. aureus andE. coli was 5 μg/disk.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

There is an increasing interest in the preparation and characterization of metal nanoparticles; among them, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are of particular interest due to their optical, electrical, and thermal properties. AgNPs have been used as catalyst [1–3], in nonlinear optical technology, as a bactericidal agent in apparel, footwear, cosmetics, and biomedical devices [4, 5], and in conductive applications and nanosphere lithography [6], among other applications. Due to their size, nanoparticles present unique and radically different physical, chemical, and biological properties compared to bulk materials; in addition to size, the properties also depend on their shapes, configurations, crystallinity, and structure [7]. One of the most important applications of silver nanoparticles is in the field of medicine as bactericidal agent. Bacteria can develop high resistance to antibiotics, resulting in an increase in recalcitrant infections. AgNPs are an alternative to typical antibiotics because their broad spectrum can counteract microbiological activity of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [5]. The antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles depends on their shape, size, and size distribution; thus, control over these properties is necessary and can be done by using different synthesis methods, reducing agents and stabilizers [7].AgNPs can be obtained by chemical, physical, and biological methods. In the chemical routes, silver ions in aqueous solutions are reduced, with or without stabilizing agents, by using electrochemical reduction, photoreduction in reverse and bicontinuous micelles, and chemical reduction [6, 8–10]. The physical methods include evaporation-condensation and laser ablation [11]. Biological methods employ microorganisms, plant extracts, or enzymes for the synthesis of AgNPs [12–14]. Plants are considered better option than microorganisms due to their availability, nontoxicity, and low cost. A large number of plants have been used for the synthesis of nanoparticles [12] and specifically to obtain AgNPs [14, 15]. In recent years, a derivation of cellulose, the carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), has been used to synthesize AgNPs. CMC is water soluble, presents chemical stability, and is not toxic and, besides, being a reducing agent, it also can act as a particle stabilizer [16–18]. However, in order to carry out the Ag+ ion reduction, temperatures much higher than room temperature or long reaction times are needed [12, 15–17, 19].In this work, we report the obtaining of AgNPs by semicontinuous reduction of AgNO3 in aqueous solutions at low temperature (0°C), using NaBH4 as reducing agent and carboxymethyl cellulose as stabilizer/reducing agent. The effect of AgNO3 concentration, CMC/AgNO3 ratio, and dosage rate on particle size, shape, and antibacterial efficacy of AgNPs was studied.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Silver nitrate (AgNO3) was 98.2% pure from Golden Bell; sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 99% pure from Fluka) and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC, Mw 90.000 from Sigma-Aldrich), were used as received. Deionized and triple-distilled water with conductivity smaller than 6 μS/cm was used.


### 2.2. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles

The syntheses of the AgNPs were carried out in duplicate using the formulations shown in Table1, using a 250 mL jacketed glass reactor. The reactor had an inlet for feeding the sodium borohydride aqueous solution. The procedure for the reduction reaction started with loading the silver nitrate aqueous solution (35 ml) into the reactor; then, CMC was added to the silver nitrate solution, and the temperature was reduced to 0°C. A volume of either 0.326 mL or 0.246 mL of an aqueous solution of NaBH4 was added using a syringe, at 2-minute intervals for 90 min or 120 min, respectively. When a concentration of 0.02 M AgNO3 was used, the NaBH4 concentration was 0.056 M, and if a solution 0.04 M of AgNO3 was used, the concentration of NaBH4 was 0.114 M. After completing the sodium borohydride addition, the reaction was allowed to continue for 30 more minutes. The molar sodium borohydride/silver nitrate ratio was 20% higher than the stoichiometric ratio.Table 1
Formulations for the syntheses of the silver nanoparticles.
Sample
AgNO3 molar solution
Reaction time (min)
CMC/AgNO3 weigh ratio
S1
0.02
90
2
S2
1
S3
120
2
S4
1
S5
0.04
90
2
S6
1
S7
120
2
S8
1


### 2.3. Characterization of the Silver Nanoparticles

A volume of 0.05 mL of the AgNPs dispersion was taken and diluted to 20 mL with distilled water. To determine their particle size (JEOL JEM-1010) a drop of the dispersion was deposited on a copper grid, and the solvent was allowed to evaporate at room temperature before the grid was brought to the transmission electron microscope (TEM). TEM images of the nanoparticles were used for the size distribution measurements. Over five hundred particles were measured to obtain the particle average size and size distribution.Diffraction patterns of the silver nanoparticles were obtained in a Siemens D-5000 X-ray diffractometer (XRD). For this purpose, the solvent of the dispersed nanoparticles was evaporated, and the nanoparticles were calcinated at 500°C for one hour to remove reaction residues. The residual powder was collected and weighed.UV-VIS spectroscopy analysis was carried out in a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 25 Spectrometer. For this analysis, a volume of 0.1 mL of the reaction product was taken and diluted to 20 mL with distilled water; a 5 mL aliquot was used for the measurement.Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) was performed on a TESCAN MIRA 3 LMU model. Silver powder was placed on a carbon tape and taken to the EDX for its analysis


### 2.4. Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles

The AgNPs were tested for antibacterial activity by the agar disk diffusion method against the Gram-positive bacteriaStaphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Gram-negativeEscherichia coli (ATCC 25922). Briefly, after the pure cultures of bacteria were subcultured on nutrient broth, 0.15 mL (approximately 107 CFU/mL) of a bacterial suspension of a 0.5 McFarland standard inoculum of each strain was spread homogeneously onto the individual tripticasein soy agar plates using sterile cotton swabs. Sterile filter paper disks (6 mm diameter) impregnated with 10, 20, or 30 μg of AgNPs were placed on the plates containing the nutrient and the bacteria. A disk charged with 10 μg Streptomycin and another with pure water were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The resulting growth of bacteria was observed after 24 hours of incubating the plates at 37°C; the presence of inhibition zones, that is, the distance from the border of the disk to the edge of the bacterial growth, was measured. For each bacterial strain, three replications were performed.Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is defined as the lowest concentration of the antimicrobial agent that inhibits the growth of the microorganism after 24 hours of incubation [19]. AgNPs were tested to determine their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and to evaluate their efficiency in controlling pathogenic bacteria(S. aureus and E. coli). Sterile filter paper disks (6 mm diameter) impregnated with 1, 2.5, 5, or 10 μg of AgNPs were placed on the plates containing the nutrient and the bacteria. After 24 h of incubating the plates at 37°C, the inhibition zone was measured.


## 2.1. Materials

Silver nitrate (AgNO3) was 98.2% pure from Golden Bell; sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 99% pure from Fluka) and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC, Mw 90.000 from Sigma-Aldrich), were used as received. Deionized and triple-distilled water with conductivity smaller than 6 μS/cm was used.


## 2.2. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles

The syntheses of the AgNPs were carried out in duplicate using the formulations shown in Table1, using a 250 mL jacketed glass reactor. The reactor had an inlet for feeding the sodium borohydride aqueous solution. The procedure for the reduction reaction started with loading the silver nitrate aqueous solution (35 ml) into the reactor; then, CMC was added to the silver nitrate solution, and the temperature was reduced to 0°C. A volume of either 0.326 mL or 0.246 mL of an aqueous solution of NaBH4 was added using a syringe, at 2-minute intervals for 90 min or 120 min, respectively. When a concentration of 0.02 M AgNO3 was used, the NaBH4 concentration was 0.056 M, and if a solution 0.04 M of AgNO3 was used, the concentration of NaBH4 was 0.114 M. After completing the sodium borohydride addition, the reaction was allowed to continue for 30 more minutes. The molar sodium borohydride/silver nitrate ratio was 20% higher than the stoichiometric ratio.Table 1
Formulations for the syntheses of the silver nanoparticles.
Sample
AgNO3 molar solution
Reaction time (min)
CMC/AgNO3 weigh ratio
S1
0.02
90
2
S2
1
S3
120
2
S4
1
S5
0.04
90
2
S6
1
S7
120
2
S8
1


## 2.3. Characterization of the Silver Nanoparticles

A volume of 0.05 mL of the AgNPs dispersion was taken and diluted to 20 mL with distilled water. To determine their particle size (JEOL JEM-1010) a drop of the dispersion was deposited on a copper grid, and the solvent was allowed to evaporate at room temperature before the grid was brought to the transmission electron microscope (TEM). TEM images of the nanoparticles were used for the size distribution measurements. Over five hundred particles were measured to obtain the particle average size and size distribution.Diffraction patterns of the silver nanoparticles were obtained in a Siemens D-5000 X-ray diffractometer (XRD). For this purpose, the solvent of the dispersed nanoparticles was evaporated, and the nanoparticles were calcinated at 500°C for one hour to remove reaction residues. The residual powder was collected and weighed.UV-VIS spectroscopy analysis was carried out in a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 25 Spectrometer. For this analysis, a volume of 0.1 mL of the reaction product was taken and diluted to 20 mL with distilled water; a 5 mL aliquot was used for the measurement.Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) was performed on a TESCAN MIRA 3 LMU model. Silver powder was placed on a carbon tape and taken to the EDX for its analysis


## 2.4. Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles

The AgNPs were tested for antibacterial activity by the agar disk diffusion method against the Gram-positive bacteriaStaphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Gram-negativeEscherichia coli (ATCC 25922). Briefly, after the pure cultures of bacteria were subcultured on nutrient broth, 0.15 mL (approximately 107 CFU/mL) of a bacterial suspension of a 0.5 McFarland standard inoculum of each strain was spread homogeneously onto the individual tripticasein soy agar plates using sterile cotton swabs. Sterile filter paper disks (6 mm diameter) impregnated with 10, 20, or 30 μg of AgNPs were placed on the plates containing the nutrient and the bacteria. A disk charged with 10 μg Streptomycin and another with pure water were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The resulting growth of bacteria was observed after 24 hours of incubating the plates at 37°C; the presence of inhibition zones, that is, the distance from the border of the disk to the edge of the bacterial growth, was measured. For each bacterial strain, three replications were performed.Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is defined as the lowest concentration of the antimicrobial agent that inhibits the growth of the microorganism after 24 hours of incubation [19]. AgNPs were tested to determine their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and to evaluate their efficiency in controlling pathogenic bacteria(S. aureus and E. coli). Sterile filter paper disks (6 mm diameter) impregnated with 1, 2.5, 5, or 10 μg of AgNPs were placed on the plates containing the nutrient and the bacteria. After 24 h of incubating the plates at 37°C, the inhibition zone was measured.


## 3. Results and Discussion

Silver nanoparticles were synthesized using CMC as stabilizer and reducing agent. The reactions were carried out at 0°C; this low temperature was used because particle growth is slower at lower temperatures; it favors stabilization during nucleation and promotes obtaining of more stable nanoclusters; furthermore, at low temperatures, CMC adsorption on the nanoparticles is larger, given more stability [20, 21]. CMC besides being a colloidal stabilizer also acts as a weak reducing agent [22, 23]. When the CMC is added to the reactor, the Ag+ ions are attracted to the negatively charged groups of the CMC (-COO−) displacing the sodium ions from the carboxylate groups and forming coordination complexes [16, 17]; then the Ag+ ions couple with the polar hydroxyl groups (R–OH or R–CH2-OH) of β-glucopyranose units, leading to the release of electrons from these groups and thus to the reduction of the Ag+ ions; these Ag atoms serve as nucleation centers for the other Ag+ ions [16–18, 22]. A slight change of the transparent solution to a yellowish color was an indication that the CMC acted as a reduction agent to form AgNPs [17]. When the addition of the NaBH4 started, the solution began to turn black because of the reduction of the Ag+ ions [10], and at the end of the addition a black and very stable colloidal solution was obtained. The product (a grayish-black powder) was recovered, obtaining conversions between 82 and 87% (see Table 2).Table 2
Average diameter (d) of the AgNPs.
Sample
d (nm)TEM
d (nm)Scherrer equation
% Ag wt (EDX analysis)
% conversion
SI
12 ± 7.8
12.57
94.1 ± 2.15
84.2
S2
13.8 ± 9.7
15.87
95.4 ± 2.46
83.2
S3
25.2 ± 9.9
27.80
93.3 ± 2.35
82.1
S4
35.6 ± 10.4
31.55
94.9 ± 2.44
85.6
S5
16.2 ± 8.7
19.24
95.6 ± 2.70
86.8
S6
12.7 ± 4.4
14.45
93.8 ± 1.98
83.3
S7
30.4 ± 14.9
28.07
96.4 ± 2.53
85.1
S8
41.4 ± 19.7
44.74
92.7 ± 2.81
84.8


### 3.1. EDX Analysis

The EDX spectrum of sample S5 is shown in Figure1, where an intense signal at 3 keV can be seen, which is due to the Ag surface Plasmon resonance. Similar EDX spectra were obtained for all the samples. Table 2 shows that the percentage weight of Ag in the nanoparticles, obtained from the EDX spectra, is higher than 92.7%.Figure 1
EDX spectra of silver nanoparticles (sample S5).


### 3.2. UV-VIS Spectroscopy Analysis

Figure2 show the UV-VIS absorption spectra of the silver nanoparticles obtained under two reaction conditions. An aqueous solution of carboxymethyl cellulose was used as the blank. The AgNPs spectra show absorption bell shaped bands and a maximum around 400 nm wavelength. This band is related to the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of silver nanoparticles and has been used to confirm the reduction the Ag+ to Ag0 [15, 18]. Furthermore, it is indicative of the spherical shape of AgNPs [16, 24], which was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It has been reported that a maximum absorption around 400 nm indicates particles with sizes between 15 and 40 nm [24].Figure 2
UV-VIS spectra of AgNPs obtained using (a) 0.02 M AgNO3 and (b) 0.04 M AgNO3.
(a)
(b)


### 3.3. X-Ray Diffraction Pattern

Figure3 shows the X-ray diffraction pattern (XRDP) of the AgNPs obtained using the formulation S5. The XRDP of the AgNPs shows the major five characteristic signals of silver crystals (at 38.12, 44.21, 64.35, 77.32, and 81.45; 2θ°), which can be assigned to the (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) planes corresponding to the face-centered cubic (FCC) phase of pure silver nanoparticles, respectively, according at the JCPDS File Number 04-0783. Similar XRD spectra were obtained for all the AgNPs. An estimation of the average crystal size of the particles obtained was made using the data from their XRDPs and the Scherrer equation: (1)d=Kλβcos⁡θwhere d is the mean diameter of the nanoparticles, in nm, K is the dimensional factor (0.9), λ is the X-ray wavelength (0.154 nm), β is the line broadening at half the maximum intensity in radians, and θ is Bragg’s angle. Table 2 shows the average diameters of the AgNPs calculated using the Scherrer equation where they range from 12 to 45 nm in agreement with the UV-visible spectra.Figure 3
XRD of sample S5.


### 3.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis

The shape and size of the AgNPs were also determined by TEM. Figure4 depicts representative micrographs of samples S1 and S5, along with their corresponding particle average diameters and histograms obtained by measuring over 500 particles; Table 2 shows the average diameter for the samples. The particles were quasi-spherical and the histograms indicate that there is a unique population, which suggests that each nanoparticle is formed of a single crystal [10]. The AgNPs obtained using the different formulations were quasi-spherical and presented similar histograms. A comparison of the average particle size of the AgNPs determined by TEM with those calculated from X-ray data shows that they are similar.Figure 4
TEM micrographs and their histograms for AgNPs obtained from samples S1 and S5 using a weight ratio of AgNO3/CMC = 1. (a) S1: 0.02 M AgNO3. (b) S5: 0.04 M AgNO3.
(a)
(b)Nanoparticles obtained using a weight ratio of CMC/AgNO3 = 1.0 were larger than those obtained when using a higher weight ratio (CMC/AgNO3 = 2.0). It has been proposed that CMC stabilizes the metal by forming a protective negative charged layer by adsorption on the surface of the nanoparticles because -COO− has a strong binding with metals [21]; then AgNPs are stabilized by interaction with the CMC thus avoiding their coalescence [23].Table2 shows that, independently of the AgNO3 molar concentration and CMC/AgNO3 ratio used, the nanoparticles obtained at the higher addition rate had a smaller diameter than those obtained at the lower addition rate. The larger particle size can be attributed to the longer reaction time that allows a greater aggregation of nanoparticles.In general, larger particles were obtained using the higher AgNO3 molar concentration (0.04 M). By increasing AgNO3 concentration, a greater number of nanocrystals are produced, and since their collision frequency increases, larger particles are formed [25].Nanoparticles size distributions here obtained are similar to other ones obtained by wet chemical routes (5 to 80 nm) [15, 16, 19, 26]. However, due to the use of a higher molar concentration of AgNO3 and the presence of CMC that allowed the stabilization of the system, we obtained greater productivities than those reported by other authors with the advantage of using a lower temperature and minor reaction times. The productivity of AgNPs obtained here was around 0.115 g per 100 mL of reaction solution and 0.229 g per 100 mL of reaction solution, when using the 0.02 and 0.04 M AgNO3 solutions, respectively. Other authors have used molar concentrations of 0.01 M AgNO3 or less to obtain nanoparticles by chemical reduction in aqueous solution, resulting in maximum productivities lower than 0.1 g per 100 g of solution [16, 19, 26–28].


### 3.5. Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles

The AgNPs showed antibacterial activity against both tested bacterial strains. Figure5 shows the zones of inhibition for sample S5, and Table 3 shows the average distance of the inhibition zone for all the AgNPs. The higher the AgNPs concentration, the larger the inhibition zone (Table 3). At the highest AgNPs concentration studied, inhibition zones forS. aureus of 8 mm and of 6 mm forE. coli were observed. The positive control (antibiotic Streptomycin) showed inhibition zones of 5 mm and 8 mm forS. aureus andE. coli, respectively (Figure 6); the negative control (pure water) did not show inhibition zone. In this study, Table 3 shows that there is no effect of particle size on inhibition of growth ofS. aureus andE. coli for the range of particle sizes studied. Raza et al. reported forE. coli similar results, since the decrease in AgNPs particle size had only a little increase in its inhibitory effect; however, smaller AgNPs had clearly a better inhibitory action againstP. aeruginosa [28].Table 3
Zone of inhibition (mm) of the silver nanoparticles.
Sample
S. aureus
E. coli
10µg/disk
20µg/disk
30µg/disk
10µg/disk
20µg/disk
30µg/disk
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
S1
3.0 ± 0.1
7.0 ± 0.1
7.9 ± 0.1
2.7 ± 0.3
4.0 ± 0.3
6.1 ± 0.1
S2
2.9 ± 0.1
6.9 ± 0.2
8.0 ± 0.2
2.6 ± 0.1
3.9 ± 0.3
5.9 ± 0.1
S3
2.6 ± 0.1
6.8 ± 0.3
7.9 ± 0.1
2.7 ± 0.2
4.2 ± 0.2
5.8 ± 0.3
S4
3.0 ± 0.1
7.0 ± 0.1
7.8 ± 0.3
2.8 ± 0.1
4.0 ± 0.1
6.2 ± 0.2
S5
3.0 ± 0.1
6.9 ± 0.2
8.1 ± 0.1
2.8 ± 0.2
4.0 ± 0.2
6.0 ± 0.2
S6
2.7 ± 0.2
6.9 ± 0.1
8.0 ± 0.1
2.6 ± 0.1
3.9 ± 0.1
5.9 ± 0.2
S7
3.0 ± 0.1
6.9 ± 0.1
8.1 ± 0.1
2.8 ± 0.1
3.9 ± 0.1
5.8 ± 0.1
S8
3.0 ± 0.2
6.8 ± 0.1
7.9 ± 0.1
2.6 ± 0.3
4.0 ± 0.0
6.0 ± 0.2Figure 5
Inhibition zones (sample S5) around silver nanoparticles impregnated disks. (a)S. aureus; (b)E. coli.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
Inhibition zones around positive control (10µg Streptomycin) (a)S. aureus; (b)E. coli.
(a)
(b)The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the AgNPs was evaluated. When disks containing 1.0 and 2.5µg of AgNPs were tested, no inhibition zone was detected. However, when disks with 5 µg of AgNPs were used againstS. aureus, an inhibition zone of 1.0 mm was observed and of 0.5 mm when tested againstE. coli; the negative control (pure water) did not show inhibition zone. This indicates thatS. aureus is more susceptible to AgNPs than theE. coli. Comparable results for inhibition ofS. aureus andE. coli by AgNPs have been reported; for instance, Lkhagvajav et al. [29] when using AgNPs with sizes in the range of 20–45 nm obtained MICs of 2 and 4 µg forS. aureus andE. coli, respectively; Mostafa et al. [19] found a MIC of 2.5 µg/mL forS. aureus when using AgNPs with sizes in the range of 42–58 nm.


## 3.1. EDX Analysis

The EDX spectrum of sample S5 is shown in Figure1, where an intense signal at 3 keV can be seen, which is due to the Ag surface Plasmon resonance. Similar EDX spectra were obtained for all the samples. Table 2 shows that the percentage weight of Ag in the nanoparticles, obtained from the EDX spectra, is higher than 92.7%.Figure 1
EDX spectra of silver nanoparticles (sample S5).


## 3.2. UV-VIS Spectroscopy Analysis

Figure2 show the UV-VIS absorption spectra of the silver nanoparticles obtained under two reaction conditions. An aqueous solution of carboxymethyl cellulose was used as the blank. The AgNPs spectra show absorption bell shaped bands and a maximum around 400 nm wavelength. This band is related to the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of silver nanoparticles and has been used to confirm the reduction the Ag+ to Ag0 [15, 18]. Furthermore, it is indicative of the spherical shape of AgNPs [16, 24], which was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It has been reported that a maximum absorption around 400 nm indicates particles with sizes between 15 and 40 nm [24].Figure 2
UV-VIS spectra of AgNPs obtained using (a) 0.02 M AgNO3 and (b) 0.04 M AgNO3.
(a)
(b)


## 3.3. X-Ray Diffraction Pattern

Figure3 shows the X-ray diffraction pattern (XRDP) of the AgNPs obtained using the formulation S5. The XRDP of the AgNPs shows the major five characteristic signals of silver crystals (at 38.12, 44.21, 64.35, 77.32, and 81.45; 2θ°), which can be assigned to the (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) planes corresponding to the face-centered cubic (FCC) phase of pure silver nanoparticles, respectively, according at the JCPDS File Number 04-0783. Similar XRD spectra were obtained for all the AgNPs. An estimation of the average crystal size of the particles obtained was made using the data from their XRDPs and the Scherrer equation: (1)d=Kλβcos⁡θwhere d is the mean diameter of the nanoparticles, in nm, K is the dimensional factor (0.9), λ is the X-ray wavelength (0.154 nm), β is the line broadening at half the maximum intensity in radians, and θ is Bragg’s angle. Table 2 shows the average diameters of the AgNPs calculated using the Scherrer equation where they range from 12 to 45 nm in agreement with the UV-visible spectra.Figure 3
XRD of sample S5.


## 3.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis

The shape and size of the AgNPs were also determined by TEM. Figure4 depicts representative micrographs of samples S1 and S5, along with their corresponding particle average diameters and histograms obtained by measuring over 500 particles; Table 2 shows the average diameter for the samples. The particles were quasi-spherical and the histograms indicate that there is a unique population, which suggests that each nanoparticle is formed of a single crystal [10]. The AgNPs obtained using the different formulations were quasi-spherical and presented similar histograms. A comparison of the average particle size of the AgNPs determined by TEM with those calculated from X-ray data shows that they are similar.Figure 4
TEM micrographs and their histograms for AgNPs obtained from samples S1 and S5 using a weight ratio of AgNO3/CMC = 1. (a) S1: 0.02 M AgNO3. (b) S5: 0.04 M AgNO3.
(a)
(b)Nanoparticles obtained using a weight ratio of CMC/AgNO3 = 1.0 were larger than those obtained when using a higher weight ratio (CMC/AgNO3 = 2.0). It has been proposed that CMC stabilizes the metal by forming a protective negative charged layer by adsorption on the surface of the nanoparticles because -COO− has a strong binding with metals [21]; then AgNPs are stabilized by interaction with the CMC thus avoiding their coalescence [23].Table2 shows that, independently of the AgNO3 molar concentration and CMC/AgNO3 ratio used, the nanoparticles obtained at the higher addition rate had a smaller diameter than those obtained at the lower addition rate. The larger particle size can be attributed to the longer reaction time that allows a greater aggregation of nanoparticles.In general, larger particles were obtained using the higher AgNO3 molar concentration (0.04 M). By increasing AgNO3 concentration, a greater number of nanocrystals are produced, and since their collision frequency increases, larger particles are formed [25].Nanoparticles size distributions here obtained are similar to other ones obtained by wet chemical routes (5 to 80 nm) [15, 16, 19, 26]. However, due to the use of a higher molar concentration of AgNO3 and the presence of CMC that allowed the stabilization of the system, we obtained greater productivities than those reported by other authors with the advantage of using a lower temperature and minor reaction times. The productivity of AgNPs obtained here was around 0.115 g per 100 mL of reaction solution and 0.229 g per 100 mL of reaction solution, when using the 0.02 and 0.04 M AgNO3 solutions, respectively. Other authors have used molar concentrations of 0.01 M AgNO3 or less to obtain nanoparticles by chemical reduction in aqueous solution, resulting in maximum productivities lower than 0.1 g per 100 g of solution [16, 19, 26–28].


## 3.5. Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles

The AgNPs showed antibacterial activity against both tested bacterial strains. Figure5 shows the zones of inhibition for sample S5, and Table 3 shows the average distance of the inhibition zone for all the AgNPs. The higher the AgNPs concentration, the larger the inhibition zone (Table 3). At the highest AgNPs concentration studied, inhibition zones forS. aureus of 8 mm and of 6 mm forE. coli were observed. The positive control (antibiotic Streptomycin) showed inhibition zones of 5 mm and 8 mm forS. aureus andE. coli, respectively (Figure 6); the negative control (pure water) did not show inhibition zone. In this study, Table 3 shows that there is no effect of particle size on inhibition of growth ofS. aureus andE. coli for the range of particle sizes studied. Raza et al. reported forE. coli similar results, since the decrease in AgNPs particle size had only a little increase in its inhibitory effect; however, smaller AgNPs had clearly a better inhibitory action againstP. aeruginosa [28].Table 3
Zone of inhibition (mm) of the silver nanoparticles.
Sample
S. aureus
E. coli
10µg/disk
20µg/disk
30µg/disk
10µg/disk
20µg/disk
30µg/disk
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
S1
3.0 ± 0.1
7.0 ± 0.1
7.9 ± 0.1
2.7 ± 0.3
4.0 ± 0.3
6.1 ± 0.1
S2
2.9 ± 0.1
6.9 ± 0.2
8.0 ± 0.2
2.6 ± 0.1
3.9 ± 0.3
5.9 ± 0.1
S3
2.6 ± 0.1
6.8 ± 0.3
7.9 ± 0.1
2.7 ± 0.2
4.2 ± 0.2
5.8 ± 0.3
S4
3.0 ± 0.1
7.0 ± 0.1
7.8 ± 0.3
2.8 ± 0.1
4.0 ± 0.1
6.2 ± 0.2
S5
3.0 ± 0.1
6.9 ± 0.2
8.1 ± 0.1
2.8 ± 0.2
4.0 ± 0.2
6.0 ± 0.2
S6
2.7 ± 0.2
6.9 ± 0.1
8.0 ± 0.1
2.6 ± 0.1
3.9 ± 0.1
5.9 ± 0.2
S7
3.0 ± 0.1
6.9 ± 0.1
8.1 ± 0.1
2.8 ± 0.1
3.9 ± 0.1
5.8 ± 0.1
S8
3.0 ± 0.2
6.8 ± 0.1
7.9 ± 0.1
2.6 ± 0.3
4.0 ± 0.0
6.0 ± 0.2Figure 5
Inhibition zones (sample S5) around silver nanoparticles impregnated disks. (a)S. aureus; (b)E. coli.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
Inhibition zones around positive control (10µg Streptomycin) (a)S. aureus; (b)E. coli.
(a)
(b)The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the AgNPs was evaluated. When disks containing 1.0 and 2.5µg of AgNPs were tested, no inhibition zone was detected. However, when disks with 5 µg of AgNPs were used againstS. aureus, an inhibition zone of 1.0 mm was observed and of 0.5 mm when tested againstE. coli; the negative control (pure water) did not show inhibition zone. This indicates thatS. aureus is more susceptible to AgNPs than theE. coli. Comparable results for inhibition ofS. aureus andE. coli by AgNPs have been reported; for instance, Lkhagvajav et al. [29] when using AgNPs with sizes in the range of 20–45 nm obtained MICs of 2 and 4 µg forS. aureus andE. coli, respectively; Mostafa et al. [19] found a MIC of 2.5 µg/mL forS. aureus when using AgNPs with sizes in the range of 42–58 nm.


## 4. Conclusions

Very stable colloidal solutions of silver nanoparticles were obtained, by chemical reduction at a low temperature in a semicontinuous mode using CMC as a stabilizer/reducing agent and sodium borohydride as reducing agent. The characterization of the nanoparticles was carried out by TEM, UV-VIS, and XRD. XRD and EXD confirmed the obtaining of AgNPs. TEM images showed quasi-spherical AgNPs with unimodal distribution sizes in the range of 5 to 80 nm. CMC proved to be an effective stabilizer agent. By using a higher CMC/AgNO3 weight ratio or a greater concentration of AgNO3, AgNPs with larger average size were produced. Greater productivities than those reported by other authors were obtained with the advantage of using a lower temperature and minor reaction times. Both bacteria,S. aureus andE. coli, were inhibited by AgNPs. The higher the AgNPs concentration, the larger the inhibition zone. No effect of particle size on inhibition of growth ofS. aureus andE. coli was observed for the range of particle sizes studied. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of AgNPs againstS. aureus andE. coli was 5 µg/disk.



---

*Source: 1390180-2017-06-06.xml*