# Study on Airborne Radionuclide Dispersion in Floating Nuclear Power Plant under the Loss-of-Coolant Accident

Authors: Shuliang Zou; Na Liu; Binhai Huang
Journal: Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Floating nuclear power plant is a kind of nuclear power plant on a barge moored specifically in an area of the sea. In order to study the factors influencing airborne radionuclide dispersion induced by the loss-of-coolant accident in floating nuclear power plant, the floating nuclear power plant platform was taken as the research object, and the dispersion of airborne radionuclide under combined conditions of platform positions, wind directions, and break directions (north, south, west, and east) was simulated by the CFD (computational fluid dynamics) method. The results show that northern and southern breaks have less dangerous island area than western and eastern ones but have more platform dangerous area than the western and eastern ones. The risk of the southern break is the greatest, and that of the western break is the least. Rotating the floating nuclear power plant platform in a certain angle can reduce the damage of loss-of-coolant accident. The effects of the dose received by the personnel under the condition of the severe accident were evaluated based on previous research, showing that the inhalation effective dose and the effective dose of plume immersion exposure were less than the radiation dose limit of 0.25 Sv within two hours in the accident. The results of the study can provide reference for the design of floating nuclear power plant platform and the formulation of emergency plan.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Floating nuclear power plant, the organic combination of ship engineering and nuclear engineering, is a new trend in international nuclear energy applications because it can provide effective and reliable power for offshore oil exploitation, remote islands, and seawater desalination [1].For floating nuclear power plants, the current research focuses on the construction and design of floating nuclear power plant platforms. Rafiul Abdussami et al. introduced the design, development status, and development plan of floating nuclear power plants in Bangladesh and considered the impact of special events of earthquake and tsunami on floating nuclear power plants in Bangladesh [2]. Paik and Park employed the LS-DYNA nonlinear finite-element method for the structural crashworthiness analysis of offshore floating nuclear power plant [3]. Geon-Woo et al. performed a scaling analysis for single-phase natural circulation and derived similarity criteria for inclination, frame acceleration, and rotational motion conditions in floating nuclear reactors [4]. In China, scientists are focusing on designing ACPR50S and ACP100S to exploit offshore oil and gas, develop island, and desalinate seawater.Floating nuclear power plants use small modular reactor technology. Although the frequency of severe accidents in SMRs (small modular reactors) is expected to be lower than that of traditional nuclear power plants due to their outstanding safety features, severe accidents of SMRs cannot be totally avoided. Specifically, floating nuclear power plants lack adequate prevention and mitigation measures due to the limitation of space and load capability. Furthermore, floating nuclear power plants suffer much more complicated environment uncertainty since they operate under ocean condition. Thus, the probability of severe accidents of floating nuclear power plant SMRs might be relatively higher than the onshore SMRs [5]. Therefore, a severe nuclear accident involving radionuclide leakage in atmosphere would pose a serious threat to personnel on the platform, the environment, and civilians in the vicinity of the floating nuclear power plant.However, research focusing on emergency rescue after accidents, specifically for the radionuclide dispersion in the atmosphere after a serious accident, is still limited.Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been able to simulate the complex fluid flows with a quantitative and qualitative description of the temporal and spatial change of the flow field [6] and is widely used in the migration and dispersion of pollutants [7–9]. In the nuclear field, CFD is mainly used in structural design such as observing the channel airflow patterns and heat dissipation characteristics of dry storage casks for spent nuclear fuel [10], evaluating the hydrodynamic FCs of a combined emergency stop and control valve to be employed in an ultra-supercritical (USC) turbine system for power plant [11], and simulating the cavitation flow of a nuclear venturi tube [12]. There is relatively little research on radionuclide dispersion, and research has been aiming at radionuclide dispersion on onshore nuclear power plants [13, 14]. Wang et al. adopted computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method to simulate the impact of large cooling tower on the diffusion of gaseous effluent from coastal nuclear power plant [15]. CFD simulations were used to observe the channel airflow patterns and heat dissipation characteristics of dry storage casks for spent nuclear fuel [10]. CFD simulations of dispersion of particles representative of inactive fuel debris simulants were performed by Thomas et al., and results showed a quite good agreement, but some improvements were needed to take into account [16]. The structure and core power of floating nuclear power plants are very different from onshore nuclear power plants, so the source term release characteristics are also different. Therefore, it is necessary to study the law of radionuclide dispersion of floating nuclear power plants.In view of this, the CFD method was adopted to study the airborne radionuclide dispersion in floating nuclear power plants under the combined conditions of break directions, platform locations, and wind directions in the loss-of-coolant accident and evaluate the radiation dose under severe accident conditions in this study, which is meaningful for emergency response of floating nuclear power plants.


## 2. CFD Control Equation on Gas Dispersion

### 2.1. Mass Conservation Equation

The mass conservation equation is called the continuity equation in computational fluid dynamics. It is derived from the basic idea that the net mass value is zero, and its expression is shown in the following equation:(1)∂ρ∂t+∂ρu∂x+∂ρv∂y+∂ρw∂z=0,where ρ is the density, t is the time, and u, v, and w are the velocity vectors in the x, y, and z directions, respectively.


### 2.2. Momentum Conservation Equation

The meaning of the momentum conservation equation is that the object is not subject to external force or the sum of external forces is zero. It is also called the Navier–Stokes equation in fluid mechanics, and its expression is as follows:(2)∂ρμi∂t+∂ρμjμi∂xj=∂τij∂xj−∂ρ∂xi+ρgi.


### 2.3. Energy Conservation Equation

The law of conservation of energy means that the sum of the generation and disappearance of energy in any closed system does not change, that is, the total energy does not change. The expression of the law of conservation of energy is shown in the following equation:(3)∂ρT∂t+∂ρμiT∂xi=∂∂xiλCp⋅∂T∂xi+Sr,where Cp is the thermal conductivity of the gas, T is the thermodynamic temperature, and Sr represents other viscous dissipation terms.


### 2.4. Component Conservation Equation

When the gas is diffused, the total amount of the released gas remains constant during the exchange of substances. The equation can be expressed as(4)∂ρC∂t+∂ρμiC∂xi=∂∂xiTC∂C∂xi+SC,where C is the volume concentration of a certain gas, TC is the dispersion coefficient of the gas, and SC is the production rate of per unit volume of component C.


### 2.5.k−ε Equation

Time-averaged mass conservation equation is as follows:(5)∂ρμ¯i∂t=0.Time-averaged momentum conservation equation is as follows:(6)∂ρμ¯i∂t+∂ρμ¯i,μ¯j∂xj=−∂ρ¯∂xi+∂∂xjμ∂μ¯i∂xi−ρμ¯i′μ¯j′.


## 2.1. Mass Conservation Equation

The mass conservation equation is called the continuity equation in computational fluid dynamics. It is derived from the basic idea that the net mass value is zero, and its expression is shown in the following equation:(1)∂ρ∂t+∂ρu∂x+∂ρv∂y+∂ρw∂z=0,where ρ is the density, t is the time, and u, v, and w are the velocity vectors in the x, y, and z directions, respectively.


## 2.2. Momentum Conservation Equation

The meaning of the momentum conservation equation is that the object is not subject to external force or the sum of external forces is zero. It is also called the Navier–Stokes equation in fluid mechanics, and its expression is as follows:(2)∂ρμi∂t+∂ρμjμi∂xj=∂τij∂xj−∂ρ∂xi+ρgi.


## 2.3. Energy Conservation Equation

The law of conservation of energy means that the sum of the generation and disappearance of energy in any closed system does not change, that is, the total energy does not change. The expression of the law of conservation of energy is shown in the following equation:(3)∂ρT∂t+∂ρμiT∂xi=∂∂xiλCp⋅∂T∂xi+Sr,where Cp is the thermal conductivity of the gas, T is the thermodynamic temperature, and Sr represents other viscous dissipation terms.


## 2.4. Component Conservation Equation

When the gas is diffused, the total amount of the released gas remains constant during the exchange of substances. The equation can be expressed as(4)∂ρC∂t+∂ρμiC∂xi=∂∂xiTC∂C∂xi+SC,where C is the volume concentration of a certain gas, TC is the dispersion coefficient of the gas, and SC is the production rate of per unit volume of component C.


## 2.5.k−ε Equation

Time-averaged mass conservation equation is as follows:(5)∂ρμ¯i∂t=0.Time-averaged momentum conservation equation is as follows:(6)∂ρμ¯i∂t+∂ρμ¯i,μ¯j∂xj=−∂ρ¯∂xi+∂∂xjμ∂μ¯i∂xi−ρμ¯i′μ¯j′.


## 3. CFD Model for the Floating Nuclear Power Plant

### 3.1. Scenario Simulation

In order to alleviate the damage caused by severe accidents of floating nuclear power plan, the island power supply scenario of floating nuclear power plant is selected as shown in Figure1. Taking the loss of water accident as an example, the law of radionuclide dispersion of floating nuclear power plants is studied.Figure 1
Working scenario of a floating nuclear power plant.Loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) refers to the break that causes the reduction or loss of the coolant in the primary circuit and the failure to take away the reaction heat in time to cause core meltdown [10]. Because the primary loop system of the PWR is in a high-temperature and high-pressure operating environment, coupled with radiation damage to the primary circuit equipment, the pipeline breaks or the valve control system fails. In this study, the description of the small break accident sequence of the Korean integrated modular advanced reactor was used as the basis for the compilation of the input card for the MELCOR code.Then, the scenario diagram is simplified and extracted, and the geometric model diagram is drawn through ICEM as shown in Figure2. The overall size is 1500 m ∗ 900 m (length ∗ width), and the size of the offshore floating nuclear power plant platform is 140 m ∗ 50 m. The layout of the cabins of the floating nuclear power plant is shown in Figure 3. From left to right, they are secondary circuit cabin (55 m ∗ 40 m), the reactor cabin (35 m ∗ 40 m), and the living cabin (30 m ∗ 40 m). The platform structure has a certain effect on the radionuclide dispersion. Therefore, different directions of the break have different impacts on the dispersion. In order to study the related laws, set the north side (A), south side (B), west side (C), and east side (D) as the four breaks.Figure 2
The geometric model.Figure 3
Floating nuclear power plant platform layout.


### 3.2. Boundary Parameter Setting

In this study, seven boundary conditions: wall1, wall2, xl, up, down, left, and right, are set, and the boundary type is set according to the actual situation. Up, left, and right are open sea areas, corresponding to the upper boundary and two sides of the calculation domain in accordance with the free and fully developed flow conditions, and it is processed as the free outflow boundary during the simulation process. The boundary conditions are set to outflow type. The lower boundary down is the wind speed inlet boundary, set to velocity inlet. The island building wall1 and the floating nuclear power plant platform wall2 are set to wall, and the radionuclide leakage port xl is set to velocity inlet.Theƙ − ɛ turbulence model and the component transport model are used in the calculation model, and radionuclide leakage takes the form of mass flow and adopts an incompressible ideal gas model.


### 3.3. Source Term Data Input

Different from land reactors, floating nuclear power plant reactor is an integrated modular design, whose core power is smaller (about 300 MWe). The steam generator is built in the pressure vessel, and the main coolant circulation pump is directly connected to the pressure vessel [16]. The main coolant pipeline of the primary loop system is omitted, the structure is more compact, and the migration path as well as the speed of source term have changed compared with the traditional reactor.Based on the above differences, the reactor data in this paper refer to system-integrated modular advanced reactor (SMART) of South Korea, and the simulation accident selects loss-of-coolant accident, which is most likely to occur in marine reactors. MELCOR code is adopted as source term calculation program. The result is shown in Table1. The radionuclides released into the environment are mainly Xe, Cs, I, and Te, and the percentage of Xe is the largest, accounting for 95%. The release rates of the main radionuclides are calculated separately, and the release rates of Xe, I, and Cs are 6.0 × 103 Bq/s, 4.29 × 108 Bq/s, and 1.3 × 105 Bq/s, respectively, which are used as the boundary conditions of CFD simulation calculation.Table 1
Environmental release share of various radionuclides.
RadionuclideXeCsITeMoParticleOthersPercentage94%2.91%0.1%0.5%0.95%1.5%0.04%


## 3.1. Scenario Simulation

In order to alleviate the damage caused by severe accidents of floating nuclear power plan, the island power supply scenario of floating nuclear power plant is selected as shown in Figure1. Taking the loss of water accident as an example, the law of radionuclide dispersion of floating nuclear power plants is studied.Figure 1
Working scenario of a floating nuclear power plant.Loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) refers to the break that causes the reduction or loss of the coolant in the primary circuit and the failure to take away the reaction heat in time to cause core meltdown [10]. Because the primary loop system of the PWR is in a high-temperature and high-pressure operating environment, coupled with radiation damage to the primary circuit equipment, the pipeline breaks or the valve control system fails. In this study, the description of the small break accident sequence of the Korean integrated modular advanced reactor was used as the basis for the compilation of the input card for the MELCOR code.Then, the scenario diagram is simplified and extracted, and the geometric model diagram is drawn through ICEM as shown in Figure2. The overall size is 1500 m ∗ 900 m (length ∗ width), and the size of the offshore floating nuclear power plant platform is 140 m ∗ 50 m. The layout of the cabins of the floating nuclear power plant is shown in Figure 3. From left to right, they are secondary circuit cabin (55 m ∗ 40 m), the reactor cabin (35 m ∗ 40 m), and the living cabin (30 m ∗ 40 m). The platform structure has a certain effect on the radionuclide dispersion. Therefore, different directions of the break have different impacts on the dispersion. In order to study the related laws, set the north side (A), south side (B), west side (C), and east side (D) as the four breaks.Figure 2
The geometric model.Figure 3
Floating nuclear power plant platform layout.


## 3.2. Boundary Parameter Setting

In this study, seven boundary conditions: wall1, wall2, xl, up, down, left, and right, are set, and the boundary type is set according to the actual situation. Up, left, and right are open sea areas, corresponding to the upper boundary and two sides of the calculation domain in accordance with the free and fully developed flow conditions, and it is processed as the free outflow boundary during the simulation process. The boundary conditions are set to outflow type. The lower boundary down is the wind speed inlet boundary, set to velocity inlet. The island building wall1 and the floating nuclear power plant platform wall2 are set to wall, and the radionuclide leakage port xl is set to velocity inlet.Theƙ − ɛ turbulence model and the component transport model are used in the calculation model, and radionuclide leakage takes the form of mass flow and adopts an incompressible ideal gas model.


## 3.3. Source Term Data Input

Different from land reactors, floating nuclear power plant reactor is an integrated modular design, whose core power is smaller (about 300 MWe). The steam generator is built in the pressure vessel, and the main coolant circulation pump is directly connected to the pressure vessel [16]. The main coolant pipeline of the primary loop system is omitted, the structure is more compact, and the migration path as well as the speed of source term have changed compared with the traditional reactor.Based on the above differences, the reactor data in this paper refer to system-integrated modular advanced reactor (SMART) of South Korea, and the simulation accident selects loss-of-coolant accident, which is most likely to occur in marine reactors. MELCOR code is adopted as source term calculation program. The result is shown in Table1. The radionuclides released into the environment are mainly Xe, Cs, I, and Te, and the percentage of Xe is the largest, accounting for 95%. The release rates of the main radionuclides are calculated separately, and the release rates of Xe, I, and Cs are 6.0 × 103 Bq/s, 4.29 × 108 Bq/s, and 1.3 × 105 Bq/s, respectively, which are used as the boundary conditions of CFD simulation calculation.Table 1
Environmental release share of various radionuclides.
RadionuclideXeCsITeMoParticleOthersPercentage94%2.91%0.1%0.5%0.95%1.5%0.04%


## 4. Results and Discussion

When the sea wind blows to the north, radionuclides are most likely to spread to the island, and the people on the island are in the most dangerous situation. Therefore, in order to ensure the safety of people on the islands, this study focuses on analyzing the influence of this wind direction on radionuclides.


### 4.1. Results for the Break Location

In order to study the influence of break location, when the wind speed is 4 m/s and the radionuclide jet velocity is 10 m/s, we simulate radionuclide dispersion of the 4 breaks in north side (A), south side (B), west side (C), and east side (D) of the floating nuclear power plant platform, respectively, and the results are shown in Figures4–7.Figure 4
Radionuclide dispersion at the northern break.Figure 5
Radionuclide dispersion at the southern break.Figure 6
Radionuclide dispersion at the western break.Figure 7
Radionuclide dispersion at the eastern break.The distribution of radionuclide at four locations is shown in Figures4–7. In order to further quantify the distribution of radionuclide, the area where the radionuclides reach is set as a dangerous area. The results are shown in the following table.As shown in Table2, when a break occurs at the north side (A), the island’s dangerous area and dangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platform are 142,325 m2, accounting for 87.6% of the total; when a break occurs at south side (B), the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are110790 m2, accounting for 99.7% of the total; when a break occurs at west side (C), the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 192485 m2, accounting for 75.2% of the total; and when a break occurs at east side (D), the dangerous area of the island and the dangerous area of the platform are 224475 m2, accounting for 99.3% of the total. From that we get the following:(1)
The total dangerous area of the western (C) break is the smallest, and the total dangerous area of southern break is the largest.(2)
The area and proportion of the dangerous area of the floating nuclear power plant platform at the northern break (A) and southern break (B) are larger than those at the west side (C) and the east side (D), while the area of the island’s dangerous area is smaller than that of the western (C) break and eastern (D) break. The main reason is that the two breaks on the north and south sides are located between the secondary loop compartment and the reactor compartment, forming a groove. The leaked radionuclides tend to accumulate in the groove and spread to the platform.Table 2
The area and proportion of the danger area of the four breaks.
Break locationIsland’s dangerous areaDangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platformArea (m2)PercentageArea (m2)PercentageNorth (A)14110031.9122555.7South (B)10914024.7165075.0West (C)19176043.472531.8East (D)22340050.5107548.8


### 4.2. Results for Hull Placement

In the event of a severe accident, the personnel waiting to be evacuated on the floating nuclear power plant platform cannot move in a wide range, but the movable nature of the floating nuclear power plant can be used to change the direction of the platform hull to change the migration path of radionuclides in order to reduce the risk. Therefore, we study the distribution of radionuclides at the north side (A), south side (B), west side (C), and east side (D) clockwise by 90°, 180°, and 270°, respectively, and the distribution of radionuclides at the northern break is shown in Figures8–10.Figure 8
Radionuclide distribution rotating 90° clockwise at the northern break.Figure 9
Radionuclide distribution rotating 180° clockwise at the northern break.Figure 10
Radionuclide distribution rotating 270° clockwise at the northern break.As shown in Table3, when a break occurs at the north side (A), the island’s dangerous area and dangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platform are 142,325 m2, accounting for 87.6% of the total. When the floating nuclear power plant platform rotates 90° clockwise, the total proportion of island’s dangerous area and platform dangerous area is 91%, but its dangerous area is 92,310 m2, which is much smaller than the dangerous area at 0°. Therefore, when rotating 90° clockwise, the risk can be reduced. The proportion of the dangerous area of other rotation angles is greater than that of the non-rotating situation.Table 3
The dangerous area and proportion after rotating at the northern break.
Rotation angleIsland’s dangerous areaDangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platformArea (m2)PercentageArea (m2)Percentage0°14110031.9112555.790°9078020.5153069.5180°15334041.3167576.1270°20400046.2187585.2The distribution of radionuclide in different angles at southern break is shown in Figures11–13.Figure 11
Radionuclide distribution rotating 90° clockwise at the southern break.Figure 12
Radionuclide distribution rotating 180° clockwise at the southern break.Figure 13
Radionuclide distribution rotating 270° clockwise at the southern break.As shown in Table4, when a break occurs at south side (B), the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 1,107,900 m2, accounting for 99.7% of the total. When the platform rotates 90° clockwise, the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 104860 m2, accounting for 91.6% of the total. When the platform rotates 180° clockwise, the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 173018 m2, accounting for 83.4% of the total. When the platform rotates 270° clockwise, the dangerous area of the island and the dangerous area of the platform are 130,700 m2, accounting for 97.4% of the total. Therefore, when rotating 90° clockwise, the total dangerous area and the proportion of the dangerous area are reduced, which can reduce the risk.Table 4
The dangerous area and proportion after rotating at the southern break.
Rotation angleIsland’s dangerous areaDangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platformArea (m2)PercentageArea (m2)Percentage0°10914024.7165075.090°10336023.4150068.2180°17204038.997844.5270°12920029.2150068.2The distribution of radionuclide at western break is shown in Figures14–16.Figure 14
Radionuclide distribution rotating 90° clockwise at the western break.Figure 15
Radionuclide distribution rotating 180° clockwise at the western break.Figure 16
Radionuclide distribution rotating 270° clockwise at the western break.As shown in Table5, when a break occurs at west side (C), the dangerous area of the island and the dangerous area of the platform are 192,485 m2, accounting for 75.2% of the total. When the platform rotates 90° clockwise, the island’s dangerous areas and the dangerous area of the platform are 193,515 m2, accounting for 92.4% of the total. When the platform rotates 180° clockwise, the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 240,510 m2, accounting for 106.5% of the total. When the platform rotates 270° clockwise, the dangerous area of the island and the dangerous area of the platform are 221700 m2, accounting for 81.8% of the total. From previous analysis, the western break has the lowest risk. After the platform is rotated, the total dangerous area and total proportion of the dangerous area are larger than those when it is not rotated, so rotating cannot reduce the risk.Table 5
The dangerous area and proportion after rotating at the western break.
Rotation angleIsland’s dangerous areaDangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platformArea (m2)PercentageArea (m2)Percentage0°19176043.472531.890°19244043.5107548.9180°23936054.2115052.3270°22100050.070031.8The distribution of radionuclide at the eastern break is shown in Figures17–19.Figure 17
Radionuclide distribution rotating 90° clockwise at the eastern break.Figure 18
Radionuclide distribution rotating 180° clockwise at the eastern break.Figure 19
Radionuclide distribution rotating 270° clockwise at the eastern break.As shown in Table6, when a break occurs at east side (D), the dangerous area of the island and the dangerous area of the platform are 224475 m2, accounting for 99.3% of the total. When the platform rotates 90° clockwise, the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 242,250 m2, accounting for 93.2% of the total. When the platform rotates 180° clockwise, the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 145,100 m2, accounting for 60% of the total. When the platform rotates 270° clockwise, the dangerous area of the island and the dangerous area of the platform are 19,510 m2, accounting for 119.5% of the total, so it can be better to rotate 90° and 180° clockwise to reduce the risk.Table 6
The dangerous area and proportion after rotating at the eastern break.
Rotation angleIsland dangerous areaDangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platformArea (m2)PercentageArea (m2)Percentage0°22340050.5107548.890°24140054.685038.6180°14450032.760027.3270°19686044.5165075


### 4.3. Results for Radiation Dose Assessment

According to the previous analysis, the break at south side (B) is the most unfavorable working condition. Therefore, the break at B is taken as an example to evaluate the radiation dose received by the workers and the public. Inhalation effective dose and the effective dose of plume immersion exposure are shown in Table7.Table 7
Radiation dose of floating platform staff within 2 hours after LOCA (unit: Sv).
The type of radionuclidesAir intakePlume immersion133Xe06.94 × 10−10135Xe04.43 × 10−10131I4.23 × 10−94.45 × 10−12132I1.34 × 10−115.34 × 10−12133I2.89 × 10−91.02 × 10−10134I3.01 × 10−102.12 × 10−9135I2.11 × 10−88.98 × 10−10134Cs5.12 × 10−104.33 × 10−12137Cs3.12 × 10−61.98 × 10−12133Te5.28 × 10−55.35 × 10−1099Mo1.45 × 10−54.23 × 10−11Particle8.21 × 10−34.89 × 10−4Sum8.22 × 10−34.90 × 10−4Total dose8.71 × 10−3As shown in Table7, within 2 hours after LOCA of floating nuclear power plant, the total radiation dose received by the workers on the platform by air inhalation and plume immersion is 8.71 × 10−3 Sv, which is less than 0.25 Sv (the dose limit in GB 6249-2011).


## 4.1. Results for the Break Location

In order to study the influence of break location, when the wind speed is 4 m/s and the radionuclide jet velocity is 10 m/s, we simulate radionuclide dispersion of the 4 breaks in north side (A), south side (B), west side (C), and east side (D) of the floating nuclear power plant platform, respectively, and the results are shown in Figures4–7.Figure 4
Radionuclide dispersion at the northern break.Figure 5
Radionuclide dispersion at the southern break.Figure 6
Radionuclide dispersion at the western break.Figure 7
Radionuclide dispersion at the eastern break.The distribution of radionuclide at four locations is shown in Figures4–7. In order to further quantify the distribution of radionuclide, the area where the radionuclides reach is set as a dangerous area. The results are shown in the following table.As shown in Table2, when a break occurs at the north side (A), the island’s dangerous area and dangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platform are 142,325 m2, accounting for 87.6% of the total; when a break occurs at south side (B), the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are110790 m2, accounting for 99.7% of the total; when a break occurs at west side (C), the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 192485 m2, accounting for 75.2% of the total; and when a break occurs at east side (D), the dangerous area of the island and the dangerous area of the platform are 224475 m2, accounting for 99.3% of the total. From that we get the following:(1)
The total dangerous area of the western (C) break is the smallest, and the total dangerous area of southern break is the largest.(2)
The area and proportion of the dangerous area of the floating nuclear power plant platform at the northern break (A) and southern break (B) are larger than those at the west side (C) and the east side (D), while the area of the island’s dangerous area is smaller than that of the western (C) break and eastern (D) break. The main reason is that the two breaks on the north and south sides are located between the secondary loop compartment and the reactor compartment, forming a groove. The leaked radionuclides tend to accumulate in the groove and spread to the platform.Table 2
The area and proportion of the danger area of the four breaks.
Break locationIsland’s dangerous areaDangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platformArea (m2)PercentageArea (m2)PercentageNorth (A)14110031.9122555.7South (B)10914024.7165075.0West (C)19176043.472531.8East (D)22340050.5107548.8


## 4.2. Results for Hull Placement

In the event of a severe accident, the personnel waiting to be evacuated on the floating nuclear power plant platform cannot move in a wide range, but the movable nature of the floating nuclear power plant can be used to change the direction of the platform hull to change the migration path of radionuclides in order to reduce the risk. Therefore, we study the distribution of radionuclides at the north side (A), south side (B), west side (C), and east side (D) clockwise by 90°, 180°, and 270°, respectively, and the distribution of radionuclides at the northern break is shown in Figures8–10.Figure 8
Radionuclide distribution rotating 90° clockwise at the northern break.Figure 9
Radionuclide distribution rotating 180° clockwise at the northern break.Figure 10
Radionuclide distribution rotating 270° clockwise at the northern break.As shown in Table3, when a break occurs at the north side (A), the island’s dangerous area and dangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platform are 142,325 m2, accounting for 87.6% of the total. When the floating nuclear power plant platform rotates 90° clockwise, the total proportion of island’s dangerous area and platform dangerous area is 91%, but its dangerous area is 92,310 m2, which is much smaller than the dangerous area at 0°. Therefore, when rotating 90° clockwise, the risk can be reduced. The proportion of the dangerous area of other rotation angles is greater than that of the non-rotating situation.Table 3
The dangerous area and proportion after rotating at the northern break.
Rotation angleIsland’s dangerous areaDangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platformArea (m2)PercentageArea (m2)Percentage0°14110031.9112555.790°9078020.5153069.5180°15334041.3167576.1270°20400046.2187585.2The distribution of radionuclide in different angles at southern break is shown in Figures11–13.Figure 11
Radionuclide distribution rotating 90° clockwise at the southern break.Figure 12
Radionuclide distribution rotating 180° clockwise at the southern break.Figure 13
Radionuclide distribution rotating 270° clockwise at the southern break.As shown in Table4, when a break occurs at south side (B), the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 1,107,900 m2, accounting for 99.7% of the total. When the platform rotates 90° clockwise, the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 104860 m2, accounting for 91.6% of the total. When the platform rotates 180° clockwise, the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 173018 m2, accounting for 83.4% of the total. When the platform rotates 270° clockwise, the dangerous area of the island and the dangerous area of the platform are 130,700 m2, accounting for 97.4% of the total. Therefore, when rotating 90° clockwise, the total dangerous area and the proportion of the dangerous area are reduced, which can reduce the risk.Table 4
The dangerous area and proportion after rotating at the southern break.
Rotation angleIsland’s dangerous areaDangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platformArea (m2)PercentageArea (m2)Percentage0°10914024.7165075.090°10336023.4150068.2180°17204038.997844.5270°12920029.2150068.2The distribution of radionuclide at western break is shown in Figures14–16.Figure 14
Radionuclide distribution rotating 90° clockwise at the western break.Figure 15
Radionuclide distribution rotating 180° clockwise at the western break.Figure 16
Radionuclide distribution rotating 270° clockwise at the western break.As shown in Table5, when a break occurs at west side (C), the dangerous area of the island and the dangerous area of the platform are 192,485 m2, accounting for 75.2% of the total. When the platform rotates 90° clockwise, the island’s dangerous areas and the dangerous area of the platform are 193,515 m2, accounting for 92.4% of the total. When the platform rotates 180° clockwise, the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 240,510 m2, accounting for 106.5% of the total. When the platform rotates 270° clockwise, the dangerous area of the island and the dangerous area of the platform are 221700 m2, accounting for 81.8% of the total. From previous analysis, the western break has the lowest risk. After the platform is rotated, the total dangerous area and total proportion of the dangerous area are larger than those when it is not rotated, so rotating cannot reduce the risk.Table 5
The dangerous area and proportion after rotating at the western break.
Rotation angleIsland’s dangerous areaDangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platformArea (m2)PercentageArea (m2)Percentage0°19176043.472531.890°19244043.5107548.9180°23936054.2115052.3270°22100050.070031.8The distribution of radionuclide at the eastern break is shown in Figures17–19.Figure 17
Radionuclide distribution rotating 90° clockwise at the eastern break.Figure 18
Radionuclide distribution rotating 180° clockwise at the eastern break.Figure 19
Radionuclide distribution rotating 270° clockwise at the eastern break.As shown in Table6, when a break occurs at east side (D), the dangerous area of the island and the dangerous area of the platform are 224475 m2, accounting for 99.3% of the total. When the platform rotates 90° clockwise, the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 242,250 m2, accounting for 93.2% of the total. When the platform rotates 180° clockwise, the island’s dangerous area and the dangerous area of the platform are 145,100 m2, accounting for 60% of the total. When the platform rotates 270° clockwise, the dangerous area of the island and the dangerous area of the platform are 19,510 m2, accounting for 119.5% of the total, so it can be better to rotate 90° and 180° clockwise to reduce the risk.Table 6
The dangerous area and proportion after rotating at the eastern break.
Rotation angleIsland dangerous areaDangerous area of floating nuclear power plant platformArea (m2)PercentageArea (m2)Percentage0°22340050.5107548.890°24140054.685038.6180°14450032.760027.3270°19686044.5165075


## 4.3. Results for Radiation Dose Assessment

According to the previous analysis, the break at south side (B) is the most unfavorable working condition. Therefore, the break at B is taken as an example to evaluate the radiation dose received by the workers and the public. Inhalation effective dose and the effective dose of plume immersion exposure are shown in Table7.Table 7
Radiation dose of floating platform staff within 2 hours after LOCA (unit: Sv).
The type of radionuclidesAir intakePlume immersion133Xe06.94 × 10−10135Xe04.43 × 10−10131I4.23 × 10−94.45 × 10−12132I1.34 × 10−115.34 × 10−12133I2.89 × 10−91.02 × 10−10134I3.01 × 10−102.12 × 10−9135I2.11 × 10−88.98 × 10−10134Cs5.12 × 10−104.33 × 10−12137Cs3.12 × 10−61.98 × 10−12133Te5.28 × 10−55.35 × 10−1099Mo1.45 × 10−54.23 × 10−11Particle8.21 × 10−34.89 × 10−4Sum8.22 × 10−34.90 × 10−4Total dose8.71 × 10−3As shown in Table7, within 2 hours after LOCA of floating nuclear power plant, the total radiation dose received by the workers on the platform by air inhalation and plume immersion is 8.71 × 10−3 Sv, which is less than 0.25 Sv (the dose limit in GB 6249-2011).


## 5. Summary and Conclusions

(1)
Taking the floating nuclear power plant platform as the research object, this paper analyzes the radionuclide dispersion law of the combination of platform position, wind direction, and platform break direction in the loss-of-coolant accident based on CFD. The dangerous area is different at different breaks, indicating that the layout of the platform has a greater impact on the radionuclide dispersion.(2)
When nuclear leakage occurs on the floating nuclear power plant platform, the hull can be rotated at an appropriate angle to reduce the risk of accidents.(3)
The radiation dose received by personnel under severe accident was evaluated, and the results showed that inhalation effective dose and the effective dose of plume immersion exposure within two hours after the accident were both less than the radiation dose limit of 0.25 Sv.(4)
By studying the impact of the location of the break and the placement of the hull on radionuclide dispersion, it is known that during the design of floating nuclear power plants and the formulation of emergency plans, the impact of the layout of the nuclear power plant platform on radionuclide dispersion should be considered, so as to formulate corresponding emergency measures.



---

*Source: 1299821-2021-09-02.xml*