# An Improved Generalized-Trend-Diffusion-Based Data Imputation for Steel Industry

Authors: Ying Liu; Zheng Lv; Wei Wang
Journal: Mathematical Problems in Engineering
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Integrality and validity of industrial data are the fundamental factors in the domain of data-driven modeling. Aiming at the data missing problem of gas flow in steel industry, an improved Generalized-Trend-Diffusion (iGTD) algorithm is proposed in this study, where in particular it considers the sort of problem with data properties of consecutively missing and small samples. And, the imputation accuracy can be greatly increased by the proposed Gaussian membership-based GTD which expands the useful knowledge of data samples. In addition, the imputation order is further discussed to enhance the sequential forecasting accuracy of gas flow. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, a series of experiments that consists of three categories of data features in the gas system is presented, and the results indicate that this method is comprehensively better for the imputation of the periodical-like data and the time-series-like data.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Data missing is one of the major obstacles to obtain valid data samples [1], which also might be common or even inevitable in some data-driven-based research fields, such as sample surveys, industrial productions, medical research, soft engineering, and wireless broadcast environment [2, 3]. The data missing problem might destroy the samples integrality since every cell in database may not be independent, and furthermore a single missing value might call for dropping the entire observed values or the useful information [4, 5]. As such, some useful information or knowledge could be lost from the data set. Moreover, the data missing will also lead to the nonresponse bias of samples which could be a serious concern for the data-driven-based studies [6–10]. In the literatures, most of the existing methods for such problem were mainly based on the statistical techniques. For instance, the multiple imputation (MI), a kind of popular technique, was used to resolve the missing data of gross domestic product (GDP) [11], cancer databases [12], and sample surveys [13]. And, a similar response pattern imputation (SRPI) was also implemented in [14]. In [15], the authors used the classic expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, principal component analysis (PCA), and singular value decomposition, while [16, 17] utilized the maximum likelihood technique to carry out the missing data imputation. However, all the techniques mentioned previously might be hard to reflect the relationship among regression variables, since the imputed values were mere approximations of unknown values. Besides the statistical techniques, the machine learning was paying more and more attentions nowadays, as presented in [18, 19].In industrial manufacturing process, the phenomenon of data missing often occurs due to the events such as data collector failures, transmission errors, or information storage errors, which directly result in some obstacles for establishing data-driven-models, such as scheduling models, data-driven based regression prediction models, and stochastic optimization models [20–22]. There were different types of approaches for industrial practitioners in the literatures to deal with these data missing problems. In [23, 24], the authors proposed a method called list-wise deletion that was easy to be implemented; however, it tended to reduce the sample data size. Considering that a lot of missing data in industry have the form of time series sampled in equal intervals in most cases, the integrality of sample data has to be broken by such deleting the missing points. Besides wasting a lot of costly collected data, this method also led to invalid results if the excluded group was a selective subsample from the entire sample [25]. Mean imputation presented in [26] was another widely employed method. However, the mean values of the sample might eliminate the samples diversity in time series whose amplitude dramatically changes, and the distortion of samples was usually unacceptable for industrial practitioners. With respect to the other statistical or machine learning techniques, the maximum likelihood estimation and the linear interpolator were, respectively, proposed in [27, 28], where the effective experiments were used to validate the time series imputation. Yet, all of these experiments showed high demands of samples, and as a result, their applications in real industrial process were rather limited. As for all of the above mentioned methods, few of them can bring satisfying imputation accuracy, once the consecutive missing happens, or the missing rate is high, and the sample size is too small.The Generalized-Trend-Diffusion (GTD) is a method of sample construction aiming at small data sets. As the virtual examples presented in [29] and the functional virtual population in [30], the so-called shadow data and membership functions were employed to increase the knowledge of small data sets; see more details in [31]. And, the expanded samples were provided for Back Propagate-based (BP) neural networks to carry out the forecasting, resulting in the prediction accuracy higher than that without expanding. Thus, the most significant advantage of GTD was that it could bring satisfactory forecasting accuracy with relatively small data sets. On the other hand, the original GTD described the membership degree to the mean value of observed sample via a triangular membership function. As such, each observed data point deviation from the mean value is proportional to the difference between the membership function values; that is, the observed data points linearly deviate from the mean point. However, such description of deviation cannot bring excellent accuracy in the imputation tasks for real industrial manufacturing process.This paper aims at the missing data imputation of blast furnace gas flow in steel energy system. An improved GTD modeling algorithm based on Gaussian membership function is proposed considering the diversity of the gas flow data and the complex missing situations. The Gaussian membership shows that the observed data deviate from the mean value nonuniformly, and this deviation makes the close-to-mean values more likely to appear in the imputation. The samples, expanded by the membership function, make the predicted values by BP-based network lean to the mean. And, such predicted values do not make the samples single as those by the mean imputation do. In addition, the imputation order is essential to the accuracy of time series problem. A both-side-toward-middle (BSTM) order is proposed in this paper which is indicated to be more appropriate than the chronological order. And the tests are implemented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, in which the sample data comes from the practice of Shanghai Baosteel Co. Ltd. The results demonstrate that the improved GTD method is much better than the original version and other methods in several cases.This study is organized as follows. In Section2, the practical conditions of blast furnace gas in Baosteel is described. And then, the original GTD and its improved version are established in Section 3, where the details of how to use the improved GTD for the industrial missing data imputation are discussed. In Section 4, the validity of the improved GTD is verified by a series of comparative experiments. Finally, this study is summarized in Section 5.


## 2. Problem Description

Blast furnace gas (BFG) is a kind of byproduct gas generated in the process of iron making [32]. As an important secondary energy for blast furnaces, coke ovens, power stations, and other units, its proper utility can not only reduce the energy consumption of steel enterprises but also improve their economic profits. Figure 1 shows the BFG system structure of a steel plant, where four blast furnaces supply the gas to consumers. However, BFG could be diffused if the flow prediction and the scheduling are inappropriately carried out, which will seriously pollute the environment. In this case, the supervision of BFG’s generation and consumption becomes a crucial task for the steel enterprises.Figure 1
BFG network of Baosteel.Currently the on-site technicians perform the balance scheduling by estimating the BFG generation amount which comes from the observed data. However, the observed data often miss due to the collector failure, transmission errors, information storage errors, and so forth. Furthermore, the generating process of BFG is rather complex, and the output fluctuates irregularly, therefore the data missing makes the workers work hard to perceive the dynamics of gas flow via generic model. In practice, the gas engineers in Shanghai Baosteel employ the personal experience-based estimation as the current wide using method when encountering single point missing. However, there are more consecutive missing points in real manufacturing process, which make such method relatively weak. In addition, if the missing rate is high, the whole time series can be treated as a combination of several small size series. In this case, the existing methodologies like the recursive neural networks presented in [33, 34] cannot be utilized because they need a large amount of sample data to train the regression model.Aiming at the various features of a large number of gas units of BFG system, we summarize the flow tendencies of the generation and consumption units as three categories, which involve (1) the periodicity-like flow data (the gas consumption amount of hot blast stove, see Figure2), (2) the concussive flow data (the gas consumption of coke oven, see Figure 3), and (3) the ordinary time series flow (the generation amount of blast furnace, see Figure 4).Figure 2
The consumption flow of hot blast stove.Figure 3
The consumption flow of coke oven.Figure 4
The generation flow of blast furnace.


## 3. Improved Generalized-Trend-Diffusion

### 3.1. Generalized-Trend-Diffusion

The GTD is a method of sample construction aiming at small data sets which generates shadow data using the real data and the occurrence order of the observed data. The importance degree of those shadow data and observed data is quantified by the membership function values based on fuzzy theories. Both the membership values and the shadow data can be treated as the additional hidden data-related information, which helps to improve the imputation accuracy. All the previous features above make the GTD fit for the missing data imputation of time series because of their lack of more information except time [31]. One can start by considering that observations are collected with an empty set, where each point occurs with each observation (Figure 5). As the data increases, the central location, symbolized “C” in Figure 5, of the data for each observation moves from one location to another. If each point deviation from the central location can be obtained, then the detailed distribution of the whole sample is clear. As such, the GTD with membership function can be used to describe such deviation. Let the membership function value at “C” be 1, and let those of some missing data be MFx. When these values get closer to 1, the missing data approach “C” and vice versa.Figure 5
Time series and central location.In the original GTD model, one can letMFt be the membership function for the data collected at Step t. For example, MF1 at Step 1 refers to Y1 only, MF2 at Step 2 refers to {Y1,Y2}, MF3 at Step 3 refers to {Y1,Y2,Y3}, and so forth. The data like Y1 at Step 2 and {Y1,Y2} at Step 3 are called the shadow data. They were called as such name because each of them was used repeatedly in each step when forming the corresponding membership functions, while it occurred actually once.Then the imputation can be done by the shadow data. One can suppose that a sequence of data denoted as{X1,X2,…,Xt-1,Xt} with Xt+1 missing has been obtained. The shadow data can be built by unevenly repeating the more recent data which bring more important contemporary information of system variation than that provided by the previous data. As shown in Figure 6, the most recent point Xt is repeated t times, Xt-1 is repeated (t-1) times Xt-2 is repeated (t-2) times, and so forth. And, such repeating was called as the backward tracking progress, since it is done in the backward tracking progress. Then, these repeated data (shadow data) with their membership function values help to enlarge the sample knowledge.Figure 6
Backward tracking process.


### 3.2. Improved Generalized-Trend-Diffusion

A triangular membership function (Figure7) was used to describe each point’s deviation from the mean value in the original GTD. However, such description was somewhat unreasonable, since it restricted the deviation form as a linear one; that is, the deviation from the central location was proportional to the difference between the memberships. Under such condition, the possibility of the data value to appear in the imputation is equal. However, the mean-like data have actually a higher possibility of appearance in the industrial manufacturing process. In this study, we can call such data vividly as high frequency cloud. If a membership function can describe the high frequency cloud more like the mean value, then the data in the cloud (mean like) will reappear in the imputation with higher possibility. Considering such motivation, the Gaussian membership function (Figure 8) could be more competent to accomplish this job.Figure 7
Triangular membership function.Figure 8
Gaussian membership function.The information diffusion principle [35] is another reason for choosing the Gaussian membership function. Information diffusion has a function of filling in the blanks like the molecular diffusion, and its cause lies on that some data acquire little information from the sample knowledge, while molecular diffusion is caused by the heterogeneity in the space distribution. As for the molecular diffusion, it had been proved that current molecular density is proportional to the concentration gradient. If this principle is linked with the law of conservation of mass, the molecular diffusion can be described in the same form as the probability density of Gaussian distribution. As a kind of incremental learning method, the GTD is a representation of information diffusion. Since the causes of information diffusion and molecular diffusion are similar, we here get an inspiration to employ the Gaussian membership function in the improved GTD. The form of Gaussian function is as follows:
(1)f(x)=ae-(x-b)2/c2,
where a, b, and c are real constants and a>0. In order to make the function adaptive to the sample construction in this study, we use (2) as the general form of Gaussian function instead of (1) as follows:
(2)f(x)=e-(x-μ)2/σ2,
where μ is the mean value of sample and σ is the standard deviation. Here, we make a as 1, since the membership value at the mean value should be 1. After its form confirmed, the Gaussian membership is capable to enlarge the sample knowledge instead of the triangular one.


### 3.3. Data Imputation

The BP algorithm is a supervised learning method in a network, which is effected by altering the weights to minimize the difference between the output value and the desired output value [36]. The enlarged knowledge then can be utilized by BP neural networks to finish the prediction.Missing data points need to be imputed one by one, so that the order of imputation should be another concern in this study. If the imputation is real time, the chronological order has to be taken because one cannot currently acquire the future data points. However, the study in this paper is a data mining job which does not need real-time imputations. Furthermore, if the imputation is not real time, the BSTM order is superior to the chronological one. For instance, let there be five consecutive missing data, as Figure9 shows. If the imputation order is chronological, the forecast error of point number 1 will be amplified so as to affect the forecast accuracy of point number 2, and the error of point number 2 will be again propagated to that of point number 3. In such way, the errors will be cumulative.Figure 9
Imputation by BSTM and chronological manner.Besides, data points in time series are always fluctuating, as Figure9 shows. If the missing happens on the hillside, the chronological imputation result is very likely to be the same as , since it continues the peak. However, the result may be like  if we use the BSTM order. That is, points number 1 and number 2 are on the peak, while points number 4 and number 5 are on the plain which both continue the trends. As for point number 3, we impute that it sings the mean of points number 2 and number 4. Obviously,  deviates from the real values more than  which shows that the BSTM order is superior to the chronological one. This summary is consistent if analyzing the missing points on the peak or on the plain.Let(X1,X2,…,Xt-1,Xt) be a time series, the index of the first missing point denotes as n, the number of the consecutive missing points denotes as m, and the variable d represents the embedding dimension, then we have
(3)X^iformer=net({(Xi-d+1,MFi-d+1),…,(X^i-1,MFi-1)}(Xi-d,MFi-d),(Xi-d+1,MFi-d+1),…,(X^i-1,MFi-1)),X^ilatter=net((X^i+1,MFi+1),(X^i+2,MFi+2),…,(Xi+d,MFi+d){(X^i+1,MFi+1)}),
where X^iformer is the imputation of the former half, while X^ilatter is in the latter half. Then all the imputations X^i can be expressed as
(4)X^i={X^iformern≤i≤n+m2-1,X^ilattern+m2≤i≤n+m-1,ifm=2k,k∈N*,X^i={X^iformern≤i≤n+m-12-1,12(X^iformer+X^ilatter)i=n+m-12,X^ilattern+m-12+1≤i≤n+m-1,ifm=2k-1,k∈N*.


## 3.1. Generalized-Trend-Diffusion

The GTD is a method of sample construction aiming at small data sets which generates shadow data using the real data and the occurrence order of the observed data. The importance degree of those shadow data and observed data is quantified by the membership function values based on fuzzy theories. Both the membership values and the shadow data can be treated as the additional hidden data-related information, which helps to improve the imputation accuracy. All the previous features above make the GTD fit for the missing data imputation of time series because of their lack of more information except time [31]. One can start by considering that observations are collected with an empty set, where each point occurs with each observation (Figure 5). As the data increases, the central location, symbolized “C” in Figure 5, of the data for each observation moves from one location to another. If each point deviation from the central location can be obtained, then the detailed distribution of the whole sample is clear. As such, the GTD with membership function can be used to describe such deviation. Let the membership function value at “C” be 1, and let those of some missing data be MFx. When these values get closer to 1, the missing data approach “C” and vice versa.Figure 5
Time series and central location.In the original GTD model, one can letMFt be the membership function for the data collected at Step t. For example, MF1 at Step 1 refers to Y1 only, MF2 at Step 2 refers to {Y1,Y2}, MF3 at Step 3 refers to {Y1,Y2,Y3}, and so forth. The data like Y1 at Step 2 and {Y1,Y2} at Step 3 are called the shadow data. They were called as such name because each of them was used repeatedly in each step when forming the corresponding membership functions, while it occurred actually once.Then the imputation can be done by the shadow data. One can suppose that a sequence of data denoted as{X1,X2,…,Xt-1,Xt} with Xt+1 missing has been obtained. The shadow data can be built by unevenly repeating the more recent data which bring more important contemporary information of system variation than that provided by the previous data. As shown in Figure 6, the most recent point Xt is repeated t times, Xt-1 is repeated (t-1) times Xt-2 is repeated (t-2) times, and so forth. And, such repeating was called as the backward tracking progress, since it is done in the backward tracking progress. Then, these repeated data (shadow data) with their membership function values help to enlarge the sample knowledge.Figure 6
Backward tracking process.


## 3.2. Improved Generalized-Trend-Diffusion

A triangular membership function (Figure7) was used to describe each point’s deviation from the mean value in the original GTD. However, such description was somewhat unreasonable, since it restricted the deviation form as a linear one; that is, the deviation from the central location was proportional to the difference between the memberships. Under such condition, the possibility of the data value to appear in the imputation is equal. However, the mean-like data have actually a higher possibility of appearance in the industrial manufacturing process. In this study, we can call such data vividly as high frequency cloud. If a membership function can describe the high frequency cloud more like the mean value, then the data in the cloud (mean like) will reappear in the imputation with higher possibility. Considering such motivation, the Gaussian membership function (Figure 8) could be more competent to accomplish this job.Figure 7
Triangular membership function.Figure 8
Gaussian membership function.The information diffusion principle [35] is another reason for choosing the Gaussian membership function. Information diffusion has a function of filling in the blanks like the molecular diffusion, and its cause lies on that some data acquire little information from the sample knowledge, while molecular diffusion is caused by the heterogeneity in the space distribution. As for the molecular diffusion, it had been proved that current molecular density is proportional to the concentration gradient. If this principle is linked with the law of conservation of mass, the molecular diffusion can be described in the same form as the probability density of Gaussian distribution. As a kind of incremental learning method, the GTD is a representation of information diffusion. Since the causes of information diffusion and molecular diffusion are similar, we here get an inspiration to employ the Gaussian membership function in the improved GTD. The form of Gaussian function is as follows:
(1)f(x)=ae-(x-b)2/c2,
where a, b, and c are real constants and a>0. In order to make the function adaptive to the sample construction in this study, we use (2) as the general form of Gaussian function instead of (1) as follows:
(2)f(x)=e-(x-μ)2/σ2,
where μ is the mean value of sample and σ is the standard deviation. Here, we make a as 1, since the membership value at the mean value should be 1. After its form confirmed, the Gaussian membership is capable to enlarge the sample knowledge instead of the triangular one.


## 3.3. Data Imputation

The BP algorithm is a supervised learning method in a network, which is effected by altering the weights to minimize the difference between the output value and the desired output value [36]. The enlarged knowledge then can be utilized by BP neural networks to finish the prediction.Missing data points need to be imputed one by one, so that the order of imputation should be another concern in this study. If the imputation is real time, the chronological order has to be taken because one cannot currently acquire the future data points. However, the study in this paper is a data mining job which does not need real-time imputations. Furthermore, if the imputation is not real time, the BSTM order is superior to the chronological one. For instance, let there be five consecutive missing data, as Figure9 shows. If the imputation order is chronological, the forecast error of point number 1 will be amplified so as to affect the forecast accuracy of point number 2, and the error of point number 2 will be again propagated to that of point number 3. In such way, the errors will be cumulative.Figure 9
Imputation by BSTM and chronological manner.Besides, data points in time series are always fluctuating, as Figure9 shows. If the missing happens on the hillside, the chronological imputation result is very likely to be the same as , since it continues the peak. However, the result may be like  if we use the BSTM order. That is, points number 1 and number 2 are on the peak, while points number 4 and number 5 are on the plain which both continue the trends. As for point number 3, we impute that it sings the mean of points number 2 and number 4. Obviously,  deviates from the real values more than  which shows that the BSTM order is superior to the chronological one. This summary is consistent if analyzing the missing points on the peak or on the plain.Let(X1,X2,…,Xt-1,Xt) be a time series, the index of the first missing point denotes as n, the number of the consecutive missing points denotes as m, and the variable d represents the embedding dimension, then we have
(3)X^iformer=net({(Xi-d+1,MFi-d+1),…,(X^i-1,MFi-1)}(Xi-d,MFi-d),(Xi-d+1,MFi-d+1),…,(X^i-1,MFi-1)),X^ilatter=net((X^i+1,MFi+1),(X^i+2,MFi+2),…,(Xi+d,MFi+d){(X^i+1,MFi+1)}),
where X^iformer is the imputation of the former half, while X^ilatter is in the latter half. Then all the imputations X^i can be expressed as
(4)X^i={X^iformern≤i≤n+m2-1,X^ilattern+m2≤i≤n+m-1,ifm=2k,k∈N*,X^i={X^iformern≤i≤n+m-12-1,12(X^iformer+X^ilatter)i=n+m-12,X^ilattern+m-12+1≤i≤n+m-1,ifm=2k-1,k∈N*.


## 4. Experimental Results and Analysis

The imputation tests of missing data in BFG flow are carried out with the proposed Gaussian membership function-based method, called iGTD here. First of all, the superiority of the BSTM order to the chronological one is tested and verified. A series of consecutive 800 data is picked from number 1 blast furnace in Baosteel dating from 14:34:00/13/8/2010 to 3:54:00/14/8/2010. Considering that it is difficult to guarantee quantities of consecutive valid data in real industrial databases, and the small set of samples is our concerns in this study, the embedding dimension is empirically chosen as 15, and the hidden neuron size is chosen as 10 in the same manner. We divide the sample data into 4 groups. For each group, we randomly remove 3 consecutive points (A, B, and C) in 3 places. The tests are, respectively, implemented in the chronological order (A-B-C) and the BSTM order (A-C-B). Here, we use three indexes as the evaluation criterion of the imputation accuracy, which are root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and mean absolute percentage error (NRMSE) as follows:(5)RMSE=1n∑i=1n(Y^i-Yi)2,NRMSE=1n∥Y∥2∑i=1n(Y^i-Yi)2,MAPE=100n∑i=1n|Y^i-Yi|Yi,
where n is the total number of imputation, Y^ is the imputation value, and Y is the real value. As for the separated 4 groups of data, the imputation accuracies for the different order are shown in Table 1. It is apparent that the effectiveness of BSTM is superior to that of the chronological order-based imputation method.Table 1
Imputation accuracies with two kinds of orders.
Group
Order
RMSE
NRMSE
MAPE (%)
1
Chronological order
169.30
0.1486
45.65
BSTM
110.54
0.0970
25.97
2
Chronological order
92.74
0.0669
18.80
BSTM
82.40
0.0594
14.56
3
Chronological order
107.70
0.0842
23.95
BSTM
57.32
0.0448
11.41
4
Chronological order
120.47
0.1022
29.75
BSTM
95.64
0.0812
21.44To further verify the effectiveness of the proposed Gaussian-based membership function, we comprehensively take the three categories of gas flow data mentioned in previous section, which include the periodicity-like flow data, shown like the BFG consumption amount by hot blast stove; the concussive flow data, shown like the gas consumption by coke oven; and the ordinary time series flow, shown like the generation amount by blast furnace. The comparative experiments are carried out by using the EM method, regression, spline, and the original GTD. EM algorithm is an iterative method for finding maximum likelihood or maximum a posteriori estimates of parameters in statistical models [37], which was widely used in dealing with missing data, since the maximum likelihood estimate of the unknown parameters can be determined by the incomplete data set. The regression method employed multiple linear regressions to estimate the missing values.We still apply the real industrial data in Baosteel to complete the comparative experiment, where the collected data are divided into several groups, and some consecutive 3 points, 4 points, and 5 points are removed from the time series. In order to cover the all of the possible situations, the removed data involves the time series areas on peak, trough, and plain, as Figure10 shows, in which the points in red are removed.Figure 10
Overview of missing data.(1) BFG Consumption by Hot Blast Stove (Periodicity Like)The experimental data are from number 2 hot blast stove in Shanghai Baosteel randomly selected from 14:28:00/13/08/2010 to 21:55:00/14/08/2010. These data are divided into 3 groups, each of which is then divided into 3 subgroups, and each subgroup contains 200 points. The accuracies of the imputation result are presented in Table2.Table 2
Imputation accuracies with different methods (hot blast stove’s BFG consumption).
Missing number
Methods
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
RMSE
NRMSE
MAPE
RMSE
NRMSE
MAPE
RMSE
NRMSE
MAPE
Regression
57.16
0.0713
22.21
55.96
0.0777
28.56
35.56
0.0489
16.96
EM
43.56
0.0543
17.88
45.82
0.0636
25.76
34.46
0.0474
17.58
3 points
SPLINE
36.72
0.0458
13.80
60.62
0.0842
31.69
22.10
0.0304
10.68
GTD
9.13
0.0114
2.88
14.90
0.0207
5.85
14.50
0.0199
3.42
iGTD
7.19
0.0090
2.05
14.42
0.0200
5.71
6.23
0.0086
2.87
Regression
47.17
0.0578
23.07
29.10
0.0333
11.52
30.12
0.0356
11.56
EM
26.15
0.0320
12.65
21.59
0.0247
10.96
26.44
0.0313
13.92
4 points
SPLINE
25.18
0.0308
7.80
21.06
0.0241
6.51
14.99
0.0177
5.25
GTD
15.73
0.0193
4.74
11.78
0.0135
3.82
17.42
0.0206
5.85
iGTD
15.09
0.0185
4.25
9.80
0.0112
3.37
16.63
0.0197
5.13
Regression
28.84
0.0307
11.90
55.71
0.0612
30.84
39.92
0.0429
20.31
EM
25.54
0.0272
13.35
39.99
0.0439
24.38
40.80
0.0439
25.78
5 points
SPLINE
47.33
0.0505
21.45
15.21
0.0167
7.00
33.42
0.0359
19.18
GTD
20.12
0.0215
6.70
7.89
0.0087
3.93
6.67
0.0072
2.70
iGTD
15.03
0.0160
5.97
7.09
0.0078
3.55
5.15
0.0055
2.16It can be found that the results by both the original GTD and the proposed iGTD are much more excellent in terms of the accuracy when the consecutive data missing occurs. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the iGTD is generally better than that of GTD. Then a conclusion can be drawn that the iGTD employed the Gaussian membership function can obtain the better data imputation results compared to the triangle-based membership of GTD.(2) BFG Consumption by Coke Oven (Concussive)The experimental data are from number 1 coke oven in Shanghai Baosteel randomly selected from 07:14:00/14/08/2010 to 14:35:00/15/08/2010. The data-grouped measure is similar to that in the validation for periodicity-like data missing. And, the corresponding imputation accuracies are listed in Table3. From the experiments results, all the five methods are almost same imputation accuracies, and in particular EM should be the best solution method of the five. However, it is mentionable that the effectiveness of the proposed iGTD still does better than GTD in this test.Table 3
Imputation accuracies with different methods (coke oven’s BFG consumption).
Missing number
Methods
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
RMSE
NRMSE
MAPE
RMSE
NRMSE
MAPE
RMSE
NRMSE
MAPE
Regression
16.73
0.0300
7.90
10.33
0.0185
3.56
9.37
0.0167
3.24
EM
9.95
0.0178
5.43
7.25
0.0130
4.05
3.72
0.0066
2.40
3 points
SPLINE
18.77
0.0336
7.73
16.81
0.0301
7.79
22.64
0.0402
9.49
GTD
15.83
0.0283
8.30
15.82
0.0283
7.47
15.67
0.0278
7.49
iGTD
13.94
0.0250
6.76
13.76
0.0246
6.55
13.74
0.0244
7.30
Regression
16.66
0.0260
7.81
11.10
0.0171
4.18
10.82
0.0168
4.49
EM
10.32
0.0161
5.47
6.72
0.0104
3.80
6.71
0.0104
3.16
4 points
SPLINE
15.77
0.0246
6.50
38.26
0.0591
9.33
14.97
0.0231
6.37
GTD
15.93
0.0249
7.44
19.75
0.0305
10.55
29.51
0.0459
13.58
iGTD
13.81
0.0216
6.07
19.36
0.0299
9.39
13.02
0.0203
6.51
Regression
13.24
0.0186
5.73
13.24
0.0184
5.55
15.98
0.0227
7.78
EM
10.34
0.0145
5.31
7.52
0.0104
4.20
10.78
0.0153
5.27
5 points
SPLINE
16.90
0.0237
9.06
21.57
0.0300
8.51
13.85
0.0196
6.20
GTD
15.49
0.0217
8.33
22.83
0.0317
11.00
20.23
0.0287
11.48
iGTD
11.81
0.0166
5.45
19.84
0.0276
9.02
19.27
0.0273
9.45(3) BFG Generation Amount (Normal Time Series)The experimental data are from number 1 blast furnace in Shanghai Baosteel randomly selected from 02:28:00/27/03/2010 to 18:33:00/01/04/2010. And, the comparative accuracies are listed in Table4.Table 4
Imputation accuracies with different methods (BFG output).
Missing number
Methods
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
RMSE
NRMSE
MAPE
RMSE
NRMSE
MAPE
RMSE
NRMSE
MAPE
Regression
108.17
0.0598
21.94
97.04
0.0476
17.11
109.20
0.0537
16.60
EM
87.43
0.0483
18.04
83.43
0.0409
15.38
71.65
0.0352
10.72
3 points
SPLINE
92.99
0.0514
17.55
86.74
0.0437
15.41
129.67
0.0638
17.59
GTD
75.21
0.0416
16.06
70.73
0.0347
12.50
56.69
0.0279
9.18
iGTD
69.70
0.0385
14.74
68.64
0.0336
12.26
55.48
0.0273
9.32
Regression
98.25
0.0457
17.99
93.09
0.0394
15.45
95.38
0.0408
15.49
EM
77.94
0.0363
14.70
75.53
0.0319
13.09
73.74
0.0315
11.57
4 points
SPLINE
128.22
0.0597
20.51
85.83
0.0363
14.29
66.95
0.0286
10.86
GTD
75.70
0.0352
14.21
63.36
0.0268
10.47
62.31
0.0266
9.44
iGTD
70.91
0.0330
13.15
63.25
0.0267
10.32
41.51
0.0178
6.74
Regression
88.76
0.0362
17.09
79.13
0.0296
11.22
76.24
0.0289
11.47
EM
72.61
0.0296
12.98
71.74
0.0268
11.98
71.39
0.0270
10.97
5 points
SPLINE
97.83
0.0399
16.72
105.18
0.0393
16.78
102.59
0.0389
15.60
GTD
67.44
0.0275
11.90
61.00
0.0228
9.63
67.23
0.0255
10.47
iGTD
67.19
0.0274
11.95
57.75
0.0216
9.29
62.95
0.0238
10.14From Table3, we can discover that the regression method presents the worst performance, while iGTD obtains the best one. For the data with normal property of time series, iGTD is better than GTD, while GTD wins all the other three methods.A conclusion can be drawn from Tables2–4 that the proposed iGTD and the GTD are superior to regression, EM, and spline for the periodicity-like data and the normal time-series-like data. As for the data with concussive amplitude, both iGTD and GTD do not have an advantage, and yet iGTD still beats GTD which means the proposed Gaussian membership function is superior to the triangular one in the real industrial manufacturing process. And, for the visual imputation results of the BFG generation and consumption, the comparative imputation curves are randomly chosen as Figures 11, 12, and 13 show, where the advantage of the method proposed in this study can be easily presented.Figure 11
Comparison of different methods (3 points).Figure 12
Comparison of different methods (4 points).Figure 13
Comparison of different methods (5 points).


## 5. Conclusion

This study aims at the imputation of missing data of gas flow in steel industry. In order to improve the imputation accuracy, the proposed iGTD replaces the triangular membership function with the Gaussian one. Furthermore, the order of imputation is further discussed. The verification experiments show that the BSTM order brings less error than the chronological one does, since more observed data are utilized. As for the different data imputation method, compared to the original GTD, EM, regression, and spline, the proposed iGTD has some advantages in the problem with data properties of consecutively missing and small samples. And, the satisfying imputation accuracy provides the powerful support for the gas resources scheduling later. On the other hand, although the approach developed in this study can handle some types of missing in real industry, some theoretical analyses and the expanded application, for example, the type of concussive flow data, need to be given a further consideration in the future.



---

*Source: 136241-2013-03-24.xml*