# Endophytic Actinobacteria Associated withDracaena cochinchinensis Lour.: Isolation, Diversity, and Their Cytotoxic Activities

Authors: Nimaichand Salam; Thi-Nhan Khieu; Min-Jiao Liu; Thu-Trang Vu; Son Chu-Ky; Ngoc-Tung Quach; Quyet-Tien Phi; Manik Prabhu Narsing Rao; Angélique Fontana; Samira Sarter; Wen-Jun Li
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Dracaena cochinchinensis Lour. is an ethnomedicinally important plant used in traditional Chinese medicine known as dragon’s blood. Excessive utilization of the plant for extraction of dragon’s blood had resulted in the destruction of the important niche. During a study to provide a sustainable way of utilizing the resources, the endophytic Actinobacteria associated with the plant were explored for potential utilization of their medicinal properties. Three hundred and four endophytic Actinobacteria belonging to the generaStreptomyces,Nocardiopsis,Brevibacterium,Microbacterium,Tsukamurella,Arthrobacter,Brachybacterium,Nocardia,Rhodococcus,Kocuria,Nocardioides, andPseudonocardia were isolated from different tissues ofD. cochinchinensis Lour. Of these, 17 strains having antimicrobial and anthracyclines-producing activities were further selected for screening of antifungal and cytotoxic activities against two human cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and Hep G2. Ten of these selected endophytic Actinobacteria showed antifungal activities against at least one of the fungal pathogens, of which three strains exhibited cytotoxic activities with IC50-values ranging between 3 and 33 μg·mL−1. Frequencies for the presence of biosynthetic genes, polyketide synthase- (PKS-) I, PKS-II, and nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) among these 17 selected bioactive Actinobacteria were 29.4%, 70.6%, and 23.5%, respectively. The results indicated that the medicinal plantD. cochinchinensis Lour. is a good niche of biologically important metabolites-producing Actinobacteria.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Actinobacteria, especially the genusStreptomyces, are major producers of bioactive metabolites [1] and account for nearly 75% of the total antibiotic production available commercially [2, 3]. A few decades ago, antibiotics were considered as wonder drugs since they warded off deadly pathogens leading to eradication of infectious diseases. However, the unprecedented deployment of antibiotics over a period of time has resulted in evolution of multidrug-resistant pathogens. There is increasing attention to bioprospecting of Actinobacteria from different biotopes. With limiting bioresources, it is now imperative for search of unexplored or underexplored habitats. One such overlooked and promising niche is the inner tissues of plants, especially those with ethnomedicinal value [4–10].The plantDracaena cochinchinensis Lour. has been used as a traditional folk medicine in the oriental countries including China [11].D. cochinchinensis Lour. has many medicinally important properties, like antimicrobial, antiviral, antitumor, cytotoxic, analgesic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, haemostatic, antidiuretic, antiulcer, and wound healing activities [10, 12]. The plant is the source of deep red resin having medicinal properties which is also known as dragon’s blood. The main components of dragon’s blood are flavonoids and stilbenoids [13]. Apart from its medicinal use, it also finds applications as colouring materials and wood varnish [12]. The slow growth of the plant along with low yield of dragon’s blood extracts, however, led to the destruction of large number of these plants, thereby endangering the plant. The current study described the diversity of culturable Actinobacteria associated with this medicinal plant and also indicated the cytotoxic potential of these Actinobacteria. The study, in a way, proposed a means for sustainable use of the plant resources without destroying the natural niche.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Sample Collection and Isolation of Endophytic Actinobacteria

Healthy plant samples (leaves, stems, and roots) of medicinal plantD. cochinchinensis Lour. were collected from four different provinces located in two countries: Pingxiang, Guangxi province, China (20°06′02′′N, 106°45′01′′E; elevation, 236 m); Xishuangbanna, Yunnan province, China (21°55′41′′N, 101°25′49′′E; 984 m); Bach Ma National Park, Thua Thien Hue province, Vietnam (16°9′55′′N, 107°55′19′′E; 1450 m), and Cuc Phuong National Park, Ninh Binh province, Vietnam (20°19′8′′N, 105°37′20′′E; 338 m). The plant samples were packed in sterile plastics, taken to the laboratory, and subjected to isolation procedures within 96 h. The samples were washed thoroughly with running tap water and in ultrasonic bath to remove any adhering soil particles and air-dried at ambient temperature for 48 h.Two methods were employed for the isolation of the endophytic Actinobacteria using seven specific isolation media (Table1).Table 1
Composition of the seven media used for the isolation of endophytic Actinobacteria fromDracaena cochinchinensis Lour.
Medium
Name and composition (g L−1of water)
Reference
1
Tap water-yeast extract agar (TWYE) Yeast extract 0.25, K2HPO4 0.5, agar 15
[3, 5]
2
Trehalose agar Trehalose 6, KNO3 0.5, CaCl2 0.3, Na2HPO4 0.3, MgSO4⋅7H2 O 0.2, agar 15
[5]
3
Sodium propionate agar Sodium propionate 2, NH4NO3 0.1, KCl 0.1, MgSO4⋅7H2 O 0.05, FeSO4⋅7H2 O 0.05, agar 15
[5]
4
Starch agar Starch 2, KNO3 1, NaCl 0.4, K2HPO4 0.5, MgSO4⋅7H2 O 0.5, FeSO4⋅7H2 O 0.01, agar 15
[5]
5
Citrate agar Citric acid 0.12, ferric ammonium citrate 0.12, NaNO3 1.5, K2 HPO4⋅3H2 O 0.4, MgSO4⋅7H2 O 0.1, CaCl2⋅H2O 0.05, EDTA 0.02, Na2CO3 0.2, agar 15
This study
6
Sodium propionate-asparagine-salt agar Sodium propionate 4, asparagine 1, casein 2, K2HPO4 1, MgSO4⋅7H2 O 0.1, FeSO4⋅7H2 O 0.01, NaCl 30, agar 15
[5]
7
Dulcitol-proline agar Dulcitol 2, proline 0.5, K2HPO4 0.3, NaCl 0.3, MgSO4⋅7H2 O 1, CaCl2⋅2H2 O 1, agar 15
This studyMethod 1.
The plant parts ofD. cochinchinensis Lour. were excised and subjected to a five-step surface-sterilization procedure: a 4 min wash in 5% NaOCl, followed by 10 min wash in 2.5% Na2S2O3, a 5 min wash in 75% ethanol, a wash in sterile water, and a final rinse in 10% NaHCO3 for 10 min. After drying thoroughly under sterile conditions, the surface sterilized tissues were disrupted aseptically in a commercial blender and distributed on isolation media [5, 7].Method 2.
The surface sterilized plant parts (1-2 g) were sliced, grounded with mortar and pestle, and mixed with 0.5 g CaCO3. The samples were kept in a laminar flow cabinet for 14 d, incubated at 80°C for 30 min, and plated onto isolation media [7].Each medium was supplemented with nalidixic acid (25 mg·L−1), nystatin (50 mg·L−1), and K2Cr2O7 (50 mg·L−1) to inhibit the growth of Gram-negative bacteria and fungi; polyvinyl pyrrolidone (2%) and tannase (0.005%) were also added to improve the development of colonies on media. Colonies grown on these isolation media were selected and purified by repeated streaking on YIM 38 medium. The pure cultures were preserved as glycerol suspensions (20%, v/v) at −80°C and as lyophilized spore suspensions in skim milk (15%, w/v) at 4°C.


### 2.2. Identification and Diversity Profiling

For phylogenetic characterization, genomics DNAs of all isolates were extracted using an enzyme hydrolysis method. About 50 mg of the freshly grown culture was taken in an autoclaved 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. To the culture, 480μL TE buffer (1x) and 20 μL lysozyme solution (2 mg·mL−1) were added. The bacterial suspension was thoroughly mixed and incubated for 2 h under shaking conditions (160 rpm, 37°C). The mixture was treated with 50 μL SDS solution (20%, w/v) and 5 μL Proteinase K solution (20 μg·mL−1) and kept on a water bath (55°C, 1 h). DNA was then extracted twice with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25 : 24 : 1 v/v/v), followed by precipitation with 80 μL sodium acetate (3 mol·L−1, pH 4.8–5.2) and 800 μL absolute ethanol. The resulting DNA precipitate was centrifuged at 4°C (12,000 rpm, 10 min), washed with 70% ethanol, and then air-dried. The extracted DNA was resuspended in 30 μL TE buffer and stored at −20°C. PCR amplification for 16S rRNA gene from the extracted DNA samples was done using the primer pair PA-PB (PA: 5′-CAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCT-3′; PB: 5′-AGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA-3′) as described previously [14]. Amplified PCR products were purified and sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai). Identification of phylogenetic neighbours and calculation of pairwise 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities were achieved using the EzTaxon server (http://www.eztaxon.org/) [15] and BLAST analysis (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The alignment of the sequences was done using CLUSTALW [16]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the aligned sequences by the neighbour-joining method [17] using Kimura 2-parameter distances [18] in the MEGA 6 software [19]. To determine the support of each clade, bootstrap analysis was performed with 1,000 replications [20].


### 2.3. Selection of Bioactive Actinobacteria Strains

Each of the isolated Actinobacteria was screened for antimicrobial activity and anthracyclines production. The antibacterial activities were evaluated against Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus epidermidis(MRSE) ATCC 35984, Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) ATCC 25923, Methicillin-susceptibleStaphylococcus aureus(MSSA) ATCC 29213,Klebsiella pneumoniaeATCC 13883,Aeromonas hydrophilaATCC 7966, andEscherichia coliATCC 25922 using the agar well diffusion method [21]. Anthracycline productivity was screened using the pigment production test as described by Trease [22]. Based on the results of the two screenings, bioactive strains were selected for further assays.


### 2.4. Antifungal and Cytotoxicity Tests

Antifungal activity of the selected bioactive strains was tested againstFusarium graminearum,Aspergillus carbonarius, andAspergillus westerdijkiae (strains producing the mycotoxins deoxynivalenol and ochratoxin A) [23, 24]. These test pathogens were provided by CIRAD, UMR QUALISUD, France, and maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA).The cytotoxic activity of the selected strains was tested by sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay as described earlier [25–27]. The human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) and human hepatocellular carcinoma (Hep G2) cells lines used for the test were procured from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Boulevard, Manassa, VA 20110, USA). Ellipticine was used as the positive control.


### 2.5. Screening for Biosynthetic Genes

Three sets of PCR primers A3F/A7R, K1F/M6R, and KSαF/KSαR were used for amplification of nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), polyketide synthase- (PKS-) I, and PKS-II specific domains [6, 28]. PCR amplifications were performed in a Biometra thermal cycler in a final volume of 25 μL containing 0.2 μmol·L−1 of each primer, 0.1 μmol·L−1 of each of the four dNTPs (Takara, Japan), 2.5 μL of extracted DNA, 0.5 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (with its recommended reaction buffer), and 10% of DMSO. Amplifications were performed according to the following profile: initial denaturation at 96°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 96°C for 1 min, primer annealing at either 57°C (for K1F/M6R, A3F/A7R) or 58°C (for KSαF/KSαR) for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The sizes of amplicons were 1,200–1,400 bp (K1F/M6R), 613 bp (KSαF/KSαR), and 700–800 bp (A3F/A7R).


## 2.1. Sample Collection and Isolation of Endophytic Actinobacteria

Healthy plant samples (leaves, stems, and roots) of medicinal plantD. cochinchinensis Lour. were collected from four different provinces located in two countries: Pingxiang, Guangxi province, China (20°06′02′′N, 106°45′01′′E; elevation, 236 m); Xishuangbanna, Yunnan province, China (21°55′41′′N, 101°25′49′′E; 984 m); Bach Ma National Park, Thua Thien Hue province, Vietnam (16°9′55′′N, 107°55′19′′E; 1450 m), and Cuc Phuong National Park, Ninh Binh province, Vietnam (20°19′8′′N, 105°37′20′′E; 338 m). The plant samples were packed in sterile plastics, taken to the laboratory, and subjected to isolation procedures within 96 h. The samples were washed thoroughly with running tap water and in ultrasonic bath to remove any adhering soil particles and air-dried at ambient temperature for 48 h.Two methods were employed for the isolation of the endophytic Actinobacteria using seven specific isolation media (Table1).Table 1
Composition of the seven media used for the isolation of endophytic Actinobacteria fromDracaena cochinchinensis Lour.
Medium
Name and composition (g L−1of water)
Reference
1
Tap water-yeast extract agar (TWYE) Yeast extract 0.25, K2HPO4 0.5, agar 15
[3, 5]
2
Trehalose agar Trehalose 6, KNO3 0.5, CaCl2 0.3, Na2HPO4 0.3, MgSO4⋅7H2 O 0.2, agar 15
[5]
3
Sodium propionate agar Sodium propionate 2, NH4NO3 0.1, KCl 0.1, MgSO4⋅7H2 O 0.05, FeSO4⋅7H2 O 0.05, agar 15
[5]
4
Starch agar Starch 2, KNO3 1, NaCl 0.4, K2HPO4 0.5, MgSO4⋅7H2 O 0.5, FeSO4⋅7H2 O 0.01, agar 15
[5]
5
Citrate agar Citric acid 0.12, ferric ammonium citrate 0.12, NaNO3 1.5, K2 HPO4⋅3H2 O 0.4, MgSO4⋅7H2 O 0.1, CaCl2⋅H2O 0.05, EDTA 0.02, Na2CO3 0.2, agar 15
This study
6
Sodium propionate-asparagine-salt agar Sodium propionate 4, asparagine 1, casein 2, K2HPO4 1, MgSO4⋅7H2 O 0.1, FeSO4⋅7H2 O 0.01, NaCl 30, agar 15
[5]
7
Dulcitol-proline agar Dulcitol 2, proline 0.5, K2HPO4 0.3, NaCl 0.3, MgSO4⋅7H2 O 1, CaCl2⋅2H2 O 1, agar 15
This studyMethod 1.
The plant parts ofD. cochinchinensis Lour. were excised and subjected to a five-step surface-sterilization procedure: a 4 min wash in 5% NaOCl, followed by 10 min wash in 2.5% Na2S2O3, a 5 min wash in 75% ethanol, a wash in sterile water, and a final rinse in 10% NaHCO3 for 10 min. After drying thoroughly under sterile conditions, the surface sterilized tissues were disrupted aseptically in a commercial blender and distributed on isolation media [5, 7].Method 2.
The surface sterilized plant parts (1-2 g) were sliced, grounded with mortar and pestle, and mixed with 0.5 g CaCO3. The samples were kept in a laminar flow cabinet for 14 d, incubated at 80°C for 30 min, and plated onto isolation media [7].Each medium was supplemented with nalidixic acid (25 mg·L−1), nystatin (50 mg·L−1), and K2Cr2O7 (50 mg·L−1) to inhibit the growth of Gram-negative bacteria and fungi; polyvinyl pyrrolidone (2%) and tannase (0.005%) were also added to improve the development of colonies on media. Colonies grown on these isolation media were selected and purified by repeated streaking on YIM 38 medium. The pure cultures were preserved as glycerol suspensions (20%, v/v) at −80°C and as lyophilized spore suspensions in skim milk (15%, w/v) at 4°C.


## 2.2. Identification and Diversity Profiling

For phylogenetic characterization, genomics DNAs of all isolates were extracted using an enzyme hydrolysis method. About 50 mg of the freshly grown culture was taken in an autoclaved 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. To the culture, 480μL TE buffer (1x) and 20 μL lysozyme solution (2 mg·mL−1) were added. The bacterial suspension was thoroughly mixed and incubated for 2 h under shaking conditions (160 rpm, 37°C). The mixture was treated with 50 μL SDS solution (20%, w/v) and 5 μL Proteinase K solution (20 μg·mL−1) and kept on a water bath (55°C, 1 h). DNA was then extracted twice with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25 : 24 : 1 v/v/v), followed by precipitation with 80 μL sodium acetate (3 mol·L−1, pH 4.8–5.2) and 800 μL absolute ethanol. The resulting DNA precipitate was centrifuged at 4°C (12,000 rpm, 10 min), washed with 70% ethanol, and then air-dried. The extracted DNA was resuspended in 30 μL TE buffer and stored at −20°C. PCR amplification for 16S rRNA gene from the extracted DNA samples was done using the primer pair PA-PB (PA: 5′-CAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCT-3′; PB: 5′-AGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA-3′) as described previously [14]. Amplified PCR products were purified and sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai). Identification of phylogenetic neighbours and calculation of pairwise 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities were achieved using the EzTaxon server (http://www.eztaxon.org/) [15] and BLAST analysis (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The alignment of the sequences was done using CLUSTALW [16]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the aligned sequences by the neighbour-joining method [17] using Kimura 2-parameter distances [18] in the MEGA 6 software [19]. To determine the support of each clade, bootstrap analysis was performed with 1,000 replications [20].


## 2.3. Selection of Bioactive Actinobacteria Strains

Each of the isolated Actinobacteria was screened for antimicrobial activity and anthracyclines production. The antibacterial activities were evaluated against Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus epidermidis(MRSE) ATCC 35984, Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) ATCC 25923, Methicillin-susceptibleStaphylococcus aureus(MSSA) ATCC 29213,Klebsiella pneumoniaeATCC 13883,Aeromonas hydrophilaATCC 7966, andEscherichia coliATCC 25922 using the agar well diffusion method [21]. Anthracycline productivity was screened using the pigment production test as described by Trease [22]. Based on the results of the two screenings, bioactive strains were selected for further assays.


## 2.4. Antifungal and Cytotoxicity Tests

Antifungal activity of the selected bioactive strains was tested againstFusarium graminearum,Aspergillus carbonarius, andAspergillus westerdijkiae (strains producing the mycotoxins deoxynivalenol and ochratoxin A) [23, 24]. These test pathogens were provided by CIRAD, UMR QUALISUD, France, and maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA).The cytotoxic activity of the selected strains was tested by sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay as described earlier [25–27]. The human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) and human hepatocellular carcinoma (Hep G2) cells lines used for the test were procured from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Boulevard, Manassa, VA 20110, USA). Ellipticine was used as the positive control.


## 2.5. Screening for Biosynthetic Genes

Three sets of PCR primers A3F/A7R, K1F/M6R, and KSαF/KSαR were used for amplification of nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), polyketide synthase- (PKS-) I, and PKS-II specific domains [6, 28]. PCR amplifications were performed in a Biometra thermal cycler in a final volume of 25 μL containing 0.2 μmol·L−1 of each primer, 0.1 μmol·L−1 of each of the four dNTPs (Takara, Japan), 2.5 μL of extracted DNA, 0.5 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (with its recommended reaction buffer), and 10% of DMSO. Amplifications were performed according to the following profile: initial denaturation at 96°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 96°C for 1 min, primer annealing at either 57°C (for K1F/M6R, A3F/A7R) or 58°C (for KSαF/KSαR) for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The sizes of amplicons were 1,200–1,400 bp (K1F/M6R), 613 bp (KSαF/KSαR), and 700–800 bp (A3F/A7R).


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Isolation of Endophytic Actinobacteria

A total of 304 putative endophytic Actinobacteria were isolated from three different tissues ofD. cochinchinensis Lour. The highest number of Actinobacteria was isolated from roots (117 strains, 38.49%), followed by stems (113 strains, 37.17%) and leaves (74 strains, 24.34%) (Figure 1). Among the sites, more Actinobacteria were isolated from Xishuangbanna (Yunnan province, China) and Cuc Phuong National Park (Ninh Binh province, Vietnam) (Figure 1).Figure 1
Distribution of endophytic Actinobacteria isolated from the different tissues ofDracaena cochinchinensis Lour. among the different sampling sites.During the present study, Method2 was found to be more suitable for the isolation of endophytic Actinobacteria from tissues ofD. cochinchinensis Lour. and accounted for nearly 65% of the total isolation. All the media used in the current study, except for sodium propionate-asparagine-salt agar, were suitable for isolation of endophytic Actinobacteria (Figure 2).Figure 2
Effect of media on the isolation of endophytic Actinobacteria.


### 3.2. Diversity Profiling

Based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the most abundant Actinobacteria genera wereStreptomyces (86.84%), followed byNocardiopsis (4.93%),Brevibacterium (1.64%),Microbacterium (1.64%),Tsukamurella (1.64%),Arthrobacter (0.66%),Brachybacterium(0.66%),Nocardia (0.66%),Rhodococcus (0.66%),Kocuria (0.33%),Nocardioides(0.33%), andPseudonocardia(0.33%). The relative abundance of the endophytic Actinobacteria among the different sites is shown in Table 2. Among the different sampling sites, Yunnan and Ninh Binh yielded the highest diversity, each contributing eight genera of Actinobacteria. Yunnan samples yielded the generaStreptomyces,Nocardiopsis,Brevibacterium,Microbacterium,Brachybacterium, Rhodococcus,Kocuria, andTsukamurella, while Ninh Binh samples yieldedStreptomyces,Tsukamurella,Nocardiopsis,Arthrobacter,Nocardia,Brevibacterium,Nocardioides, andPseudonocardia. Thua Thien Hue samples containedStreptomyces,Nocardiopsis, andMicrobacterium, whileStreptomycesandNocardiopsis were present in Guangxi samples.Table 2
Distribution of endophytic Actinobacteria isolated from the different tissues ofD. cochinchinensis Lour. among the different sampling sites.
Genera
YunnanChina
GuangxiChina
Thua Thien HueVietnam
Ninh BinhVietnam
Total
Arthrobacter
0
0
0
2
2
Brachybacterium
2
0
0
0
2
Brevibacterium
4
0
0
1
5
Kocuria
1
0
0
0
1
Microbacterium
4
0
1
0
5
Nocardia
0
0
0
2
2
Nocardioides
0
0
0
1
1
Nocardiopsis
8
1
2
4
15
Pseudonocardia
0
0
0
1
1
Rhodococcus
2
0
0
0
2
Streptomyces
104
46
30
82
262
Tsukamurella
1
0
0
5
6
Total
126
47
33
98
304


### 3.3. Selection of Bioactive Actinobacteria Strains

All 304 Actinobacteria isolates were tested for antimicrobial activity and anthracycline production. Table3 represents the distribution of bioactive Actinobacteria. These bioactive strains were distributed in the generaStreptomyces,Nocardiopsis,Nocardioides,Pseudonocardia, andTsukamurella. The genusStreptomycespossessed the highest proportion of isolates with antimicrobial activities. Anthracyclines are important group of antitumor antibiotics and are being used in cancer treatment [29, 30]. Of the 304 strains, 49 strains tested positive for anthracycline production.Table 3
Bioactivity profiles of the endophytic Actinobacteria isolated fromD. cochinchinensis Lour.
Genera
Antimicrobial activity
Anthracycline production
ATCC 35984
ATCC 25923
ATCC 29213
ATCC 13883
ATCC 7966
ATCC 25922
Arthrobacter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Brachybacterium
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Brevibacterium
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Kocuria
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Microbacterium
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Nocardia
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Nocardioides
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
Nocardiopsis
0
3
4
1
0
0
1
Pseudonocardia
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
Rhodococcus
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Streptomyces
70
68
70
70
96
53
46
Tsukamurella
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Total
70
71
76
72
98
53
49
Proportion (%)
23.03
23.26
25.00
23.68
32.43
17.43
16.11
Note. Number indicates number of isolates positive for the particular bioactivity.
ATCC 35984, Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus epidermidis(MRSE); ATCC 25923, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA); ATCC 29213, Methicillin-susceptibleStaphylococcus aureus (MSSA); ATCC 13883, Klebsiella pneumoniae; ATCC 7966, Aeromonas hydrophila; ATCC 25922, Escherichia coli.Based on the results of the bioactivity screening, 17 strains (HUST001-HUST011, HUST013-HUST015, HUST017, HUST018, and HUST026) were selected for further antifungal and cytotoxicity studies (Table4). Of the 17 strains, 14 belonged to the generaStreptomyces while the rest comprisedNocardioides,Nocardiopsis, andPseudonocardia (Figure 3).Table 4
Isolation and characterization profile of the 17 selected endophytic Actinobacteria.
Strain
Samplingsite∗
Isolation medium
Isolation method
Source
Accession number
Closest homologs
Pairwise similarity
HUST001
NB
3
2
Stem
KT033860
Streptomyces puniceus NBRC 12811T
100.0
HUST002
GX
2
1
Stem
KP317660
Streptomyces violarus NBRC 13104T
99.45
HUST003
TTH
5
1
Stem
KT033861
Streptomyces cavourensis NBRC 13026T
99.70
HUST004
YN
3
2
Root
KT033862
Streptomyces cavourensis NBRC 13026T
100.0
HUST005
NB
4
2
Stem
KT033863
Streptomyces parvulus NBRC 13193T
99.73
HUST006
NB
3
2
Stem
KT033864
Streptomyces rubiginosohelvolus NBRC 12912T
99.72
HUST007
YN
5
1
Root
KT033865
Streptomyces puniceus NBRC 12811T
100.0
HUST008
TTH
6
2
Stem
KT033866
Streptomyces puniceus NBRC 12811T
99.80
HUST009
YN
3
2
Stem
KT033867
Streptomyces puniceus NBRC 12811T
98.66
HUST010
YN
2
1
Root
KT033868
Streptomyces pluricolorescens NBRC 12808T
100.0
HUST011
GX
3
1
Root
KT033869
Streptomyces parvulus NBRC 12811T
100.0
HUST013
NB
4
1
Root
KT033870
Pseudonocardia carboxidivorans  Y8T
100.0
HUST014
TTH
5
1
Root
KT033871
Streptomyces augustmycinicus NBRC 3934T
99.85
HUST015
TTH
7
2
Stem
KT033872
Streptomyces violarus NBRC 13104T
99.57
HUST017
YN
2
2
Leaf
KT033873
Nocardiopsis dassonvilleisubsp. albirubidaDSM 40465T
100.0
HUST018
NB
1
2
Root
KT033874
Streptomyces graminisoli JR-19T
99.45
HUST026
NB
1
2
Root
KT033859
Nocardioides ganghwensis  JC2055T
98.26
Y
N
∗, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan province, China; GX, Pingxiang, Guangxi province, China; TTH, Bach Ma National Park, Thua Thien Hue province, Vietnam; NB, Cuc Phuong National Park, Ninh Binh province, Vietnam.Figure 3
Neighbour-joining phylogenetic dendrogram based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationship of the selected 18 endophytic Actinobacteria with their closest species.


### 3.4. Evaluation of Antifungal and Cytotoxicity Effects of the Bioactive Strains

Several strains among the selected bioactive Actinobacteria were positive for antifungal activities against the mycotoxins-producingF. graminearum,A. carbonarius, andA. westerdijkiae strains. Frequencies of the antifungal activities against the indicator fungal pathogens were as follows:F. graminearum: 58.8%;A. carbonarius: 41.2%; andA. westerdijkiae: 23.5%. Table 5 summarizes the antifungal profile of the selected 17 strains.Table 5
Antifungal, cytotoxic, and biosynthetic gene profiles of the 17 selected endophytic Actinobacteria isolated fromD. cochinchinensis Lour.
Strain
Test pathogens
Cytotoxicity on MCF-7 (given in % inhibition)
Cytotoxicity on Hep G2 (given in % inhibition)
Biosynthetic genes
Fusarium graminearum
Aspergillus carbonarius
Aspergillus westerdijkiae
Concentration (μg⋅ml−1)
10000
2000
400
80
16
IC50
10000
2000
400
80
16
IC50
PKS-I
PKS-II
NRPS
HUST001
+
−
−
101.74
94.48
70.47
63.70
48.84
19
103.92
103.29
102.75
56.25
12.42
68
−
+
−
HUST002
−
−
−
112.12
89.42
62.60
31.86
15.99
194
105.66
94.93
45.31
17.74
4.48
547
−
+
−
HUST003
+
+
+
106.71
97.45
67.50
44.38
19.33
120
109.97
109.29
90.54
54.56
−4.41
56
+
+
+
HUST004
+
+
+
105.40
88.68
73.52
62.87
56.94
3
109.18
107.70
103.23
87.50
62.08
10
+
+
+
HUST005
+
+
+
107.96
106.95
103.59
58.13
44.02
25
109.38
95.95
97.89
56.33
37.92
33
−
+
+
HUST006
−
−
−
78.54
17.16
5.59
−1.08
−10.50
5710
88.18
13.60
9.25
−2.98
−5.14
5745
−
−
−
HUST007
+
−
−
97.06
82.03
33.40
25.28
18.73
832
125.34
107.26
35.64
−3.78
−5.46
587
+
−
−
HUST008
−
−
−
99.71
81.92
42.76
30.32
11.34
399
105.41
103.72
27.53
8.78
−2.05
633
−
−
−
HUST009
−
−
−
94.51
84.24
26.54
16.43
8.34
870
121.62
104.90
18.83
−6.83
−17.04
688
+
+
−
HUST010
+
+
−
98.86
98.72
68.98
29.28
11.93
166
98.50
97.87
58.09
34.39
13.29
271
−
+
−
HUST011
+
+
−
98.10
54.71
47.71
39.48
24.42
695
85.25
47.37
27.53
13.06
−14.29
1721
+
+
−
HUST013
−
−
−
53.93
0.62
−3.91
−5.34
−6.81
9517
9.34
−3.28
−14.36
−19.50
−13.38
>10000
−
+
−
HUST014
+
−
−
91.67
80.05
52.38
43.63
11.27
249
109.90
106.17
86.86
46.85
−6.02
77
−
−
−
HUST015
−
−
−
99.05
83.68
70.60
37.20
15.59
129
101.49
97.87
76.25
32.02
−4.37
172
−
+
−
HUST017
−
−
−
22.66
−0.40
−1.00
−2.63
−8.75
>10000
−1.27
−1.70
−2.76
−1.54
−12.18
>10000
−
−
−
HUST018
+
+
−
42.02
6.29
4.41
−1.26
0.57
>10000
32.18
−0.88
−2.25
−12.44
−15.58
>10000
−
+
+
HUST026
+
+
+
92.08
86.55
37.72
28.64
22.61
623
104.63
86.23
38.05
21.95
10.72
691
−
+
−Of the 17 strains, three strains (HUST001, HUST004, and HUST005) exhibited cytotoxic effects against the two tested human cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and Hep G2 (Table5). Strain HUST004 showed significant inhibition toward MCF-7 cells with IC50-value of 3 μg·mL−1, while strains HUST001 and HUST005 showed moderate activity with IC50-values of 19 and 25 μg·mL−1, respectively. Against Hep G2 cell lines, IC50-values for the strains HUST004 and HUST005 were 10 and 33 μg·mL−1, respectively. The remaining strains were inactive against the two cancer cell lines.


### 3.5. Screening of Biosynthetic Genes

All 17 bioactive strains were investigated for the presence of PKS-I, PKS-II, and NRPS genes. Frequencies of positive PCR amplification of the three biosynthetic systems were 29.41%, 70.59%, and 23.53%, respectively (Table5). All these three genes were detected in two strains (HUST003, HUST004), which were identified as members of the genusStreptomyces. PKS-II gene was detected at highest frequencies in bothStreptomyces and non-Streptomycetes genera, while PKS-I and NRPS genes were detected only in the genusStreptomyces.


## 3.1. Isolation of Endophytic Actinobacteria

A total of 304 putative endophytic Actinobacteria were isolated from three different tissues ofD. cochinchinensis Lour. The highest number of Actinobacteria was isolated from roots (117 strains, 38.49%), followed by stems (113 strains, 37.17%) and leaves (74 strains, 24.34%) (Figure 1). Among the sites, more Actinobacteria were isolated from Xishuangbanna (Yunnan province, China) and Cuc Phuong National Park (Ninh Binh province, Vietnam) (Figure 1).Figure 1
Distribution of endophytic Actinobacteria isolated from the different tissues ofDracaena cochinchinensis Lour. among the different sampling sites.During the present study, Method2 was found to be more suitable for the isolation of endophytic Actinobacteria from tissues ofD. cochinchinensis Lour. and accounted for nearly 65% of the total isolation. All the media used in the current study, except for sodium propionate-asparagine-salt agar, were suitable for isolation of endophytic Actinobacteria (Figure 2).Figure 2
Effect of media on the isolation of endophytic Actinobacteria.


## 3.2. Diversity Profiling

Based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the most abundant Actinobacteria genera wereStreptomyces (86.84%), followed byNocardiopsis (4.93%),Brevibacterium (1.64%),Microbacterium (1.64%),Tsukamurella (1.64%),Arthrobacter (0.66%),Brachybacterium(0.66%),Nocardia (0.66%),Rhodococcus (0.66%),Kocuria (0.33%),Nocardioides(0.33%), andPseudonocardia(0.33%). The relative abundance of the endophytic Actinobacteria among the different sites is shown in Table 2. Among the different sampling sites, Yunnan and Ninh Binh yielded the highest diversity, each contributing eight genera of Actinobacteria. Yunnan samples yielded the generaStreptomyces,Nocardiopsis,Brevibacterium,Microbacterium,Brachybacterium, Rhodococcus,Kocuria, andTsukamurella, while Ninh Binh samples yieldedStreptomyces,Tsukamurella,Nocardiopsis,Arthrobacter,Nocardia,Brevibacterium,Nocardioides, andPseudonocardia. Thua Thien Hue samples containedStreptomyces,Nocardiopsis, andMicrobacterium, whileStreptomycesandNocardiopsis were present in Guangxi samples.Table 2
Distribution of endophytic Actinobacteria isolated from the different tissues ofD. cochinchinensis Lour. among the different sampling sites.
Genera
YunnanChina
GuangxiChina
Thua Thien HueVietnam
Ninh BinhVietnam
Total
Arthrobacter
0
0
0
2
2
Brachybacterium
2
0
0
0
2
Brevibacterium
4
0
0
1
5
Kocuria
1
0
0
0
1
Microbacterium
4
0
1
0
5
Nocardia
0
0
0
2
2
Nocardioides
0
0
0
1
1
Nocardiopsis
8
1
2
4
15
Pseudonocardia
0
0
0
1
1
Rhodococcus
2
0
0
0
2
Streptomyces
104
46
30
82
262
Tsukamurella
1
0
0
5
6
Total
126
47
33
98
304


## 3.3. Selection of Bioactive Actinobacteria Strains

All 304 Actinobacteria isolates were tested for antimicrobial activity and anthracycline production. Table3 represents the distribution of bioactive Actinobacteria. These bioactive strains were distributed in the generaStreptomyces,Nocardiopsis,Nocardioides,Pseudonocardia, andTsukamurella. The genusStreptomycespossessed the highest proportion of isolates with antimicrobial activities. Anthracyclines are important group of antitumor antibiotics and are being used in cancer treatment [29, 30]. Of the 304 strains, 49 strains tested positive for anthracycline production.Table 3
Bioactivity profiles of the endophytic Actinobacteria isolated fromD. cochinchinensis Lour.
Genera
Antimicrobial activity
Anthracycline production
ATCC 35984
ATCC 25923
ATCC 29213
ATCC 13883
ATCC 7966
ATCC 25922
Arthrobacter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Brachybacterium
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Brevibacterium
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Kocuria
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Microbacterium
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Nocardia
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Nocardioides
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
Nocardiopsis
0
3
4
1
0
0
1
Pseudonocardia
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
Rhodococcus
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Streptomyces
70
68
70
70
96
53
46
Tsukamurella
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Total
70
71
76
72
98
53
49
Proportion (%)
23.03
23.26
25.00
23.68
32.43
17.43
16.11
Note. Number indicates number of isolates positive for the particular bioactivity.
ATCC 35984, Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus epidermidis(MRSE); ATCC 25923, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA); ATCC 29213, Methicillin-susceptibleStaphylococcus aureus (MSSA); ATCC 13883, Klebsiella pneumoniae; ATCC 7966, Aeromonas hydrophila; ATCC 25922, Escherichia coli.Based on the results of the bioactivity screening, 17 strains (HUST001-HUST011, HUST013-HUST015, HUST017, HUST018, and HUST026) were selected for further antifungal and cytotoxicity studies (Table4). Of the 17 strains, 14 belonged to the generaStreptomyces while the rest comprisedNocardioides,Nocardiopsis, andPseudonocardia (Figure 3).Table 4
Isolation and characterization profile of the 17 selected endophytic Actinobacteria.
Strain
Samplingsite∗
Isolation medium
Isolation method
Source
Accession number
Closest homologs
Pairwise similarity
HUST001
NB
3
2
Stem
KT033860
Streptomyces puniceus NBRC 12811T
100.0
HUST002
GX
2
1
Stem
KP317660
Streptomyces violarus NBRC 13104T
99.45
HUST003
TTH
5
1
Stem
KT033861
Streptomyces cavourensis NBRC 13026T
99.70
HUST004
YN
3
2
Root
KT033862
Streptomyces cavourensis NBRC 13026T
100.0
HUST005
NB
4
2
Stem
KT033863
Streptomyces parvulus NBRC 13193T
99.73
HUST006
NB
3
2
Stem
KT033864
Streptomyces rubiginosohelvolus NBRC 12912T
99.72
HUST007
YN
5
1
Root
KT033865
Streptomyces puniceus NBRC 12811T
100.0
HUST008
TTH
6
2
Stem
KT033866
Streptomyces puniceus NBRC 12811T
99.80
HUST009
YN
3
2
Stem
KT033867
Streptomyces puniceus NBRC 12811T
98.66
HUST010
YN
2
1
Root
KT033868
Streptomyces pluricolorescens NBRC 12808T
100.0
HUST011
GX
3
1
Root
KT033869
Streptomyces parvulus NBRC 12811T
100.0
HUST013
NB
4
1
Root
KT033870
Pseudonocardia carboxidivorans  Y8T
100.0
HUST014
TTH
5
1
Root
KT033871
Streptomyces augustmycinicus NBRC 3934T
99.85
HUST015
TTH
7
2
Stem
KT033872
Streptomyces violarus NBRC 13104T
99.57
HUST017
YN
2
2
Leaf
KT033873
Nocardiopsis dassonvilleisubsp. albirubidaDSM 40465T
100.0
HUST018
NB
1
2
Root
KT033874
Streptomyces graminisoli JR-19T
99.45
HUST026
NB
1
2
Root
KT033859
Nocardioides ganghwensis  JC2055T
98.26
Y
N
∗, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan province, China; GX, Pingxiang, Guangxi province, China; TTH, Bach Ma National Park, Thua Thien Hue province, Vietnam; NB, Cuc Phuong National Park, Ninh Binh province, Vietnam.Figure 3
Neighbour-joining phylogenetic dendrogram based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationship of the selected 18 endophytic Actinobacteria with their closest species.


## 3.4. Evaluation of Antifungal and Cytotoxicity Effects of the Bioactive Strains

Several strains among the selected bioactive Actinobacteria were positive for antifungal activities against the mycotoxins-producingF. graminearum,A. carbonarius, andA. westerdijkiae strains. Frequencies of the antifungal activities against the indicator fungal pathogens were as follows:F. graminearum: 58.8%;A. carbonarius: 41.2%; andA. westerdijkiae: 23.5%. Table 5 summarizes the antifungal profile of the selected 17 strains.Table 5
Antifungal, cytotoxic, and biosynthetic gene profiles of the 17 selected endophytic Actinobacteria isolated fromD. cochinchinensis Lour.
Strain
Test pathogens
Cytotoxicity on MCF-7 (given in % inhibition)
Cytotoxicity on Hep G2 (given in % inhibition)
Biosynthetic genes
Fusarium graminearum
Aspergillus carbonarius
Aspergillus westerdijkiae
Concentration (μg⋅ml−1)
10000
2000
400
80
16
IC50
10000
2000
400
80
16
IC50
PKS-I
PKS-II
NRPS
HUST001
+
−
−
101.74
94.48
70.47
63.70
48.84
19
103.92
103.29
102.75
56.25
12.42
68
−
+
−
HUST002
−
−
−
112.12
89.42
62.60
31.86
15.99
194
105.66
94.93
45.31
17.74
4.48
547
−
+
−
HUST003
+
+
+
106.71
97.45
67.50
44.38
19.33
120
109.97
109.29
90.54
54.56
−4.41
56
+
+
+
HUST004
+
+
+
105.40
88.68
73.52
62.87
56.94
3
109.18
107.70
103.23
87.50
62.08
10
+
+
+
HUST005
+
+
+
107.96
106.95
103.59
58.13
44.02
25
109.38
95.95
97.89
56.33
37.92
33
−
+
+
HUST006
−
−
−
78.54
17.16
5.59
−1.08
−10.50
5710
88.18
13.60
9.25
−2.98
−5.14
5745
−
−
−
HUST007
+
−
−
97.06
82.03
33.40
25.28
18.73
832
125.34
107.26
35.64
−3.78
−5.46
587
+
−
−
HUST008
−
−
−
99.71
81.92
42.76
30.32
11.34
399
105.41
103.72
27.53
8.78
−2.05
633
−
−
−
HUST009
−
−
−
94.51
84.24
26.54
16.43
8.34
870
121.62
104.90
18.83
−6.83
−17.04
688
+
+
−
HUST010
+
+
−
98.86
98.72
68.98
29.28
11.93
166
98.50
97.87
58.09
34.39
13.29
271
−
+
−
HUST011
+
+
−
98.10
54.71
47.71
39.48
24.42
695
85.25
47.37
27.53
13.06
−14.29
1721
+
+
−
HUST013
−
−
−
53.93
0.62
−3.91
−5.34
−6.81
9517
9.34
−3.28
−14.36
−19.50
−13.38
>10000
−
+
−
HUST014
+
−
−
91.67
80.05
52.38
43.63
11.27
249
109.90
106.17
86.86
46.85
−6.02
77
−
−
−
HUST015
−
−
−
99.05
83.68
70.60
37.20
15.59
129
101.49
97.87
76.25
32.02
−4.37
172
−
+
−
HUST017
−
−
−
22.66
−0.40
−1.00
−2.63
−8.75
>10000
−1.27
−1.70
−2.76
−1.54
−12.18
>10000
−
−
−
HUST018
+
+
−
42.02
6.29
4.41
−1.26
0.57
>10000
32.18
−0.88
−2.25
−12.44
−15.58
>10000
−
+
+
HUST026
+
+
+
92.08
86.55
37.72
28.64
22.61
623
104.63
86.23
38.05
21.95
10.72
691
−
+
−Of the 17 strains, three strains (HUST001, HUST004, and HUST005) exhibited cytotoxic effects against the two tested human cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and Hep G2 (Table5). Strain HUST004 showed significant inhibition toward MCF-7 cells with IC50-value of 3 μg·mL−1, while strains HUST001 and HUST005 showed moderate activity with IC50-values of 19 and 25 μg·mL−1, respectively. Against Hep G2 cell lines, IC50-values for the strains HUST004 and HUST005 were 10 and 33 μg·mL−1, respectively. The remaining strains were inactive against the two cancer cell lines.


## 3.5. Screening of Biosynthetic Genes

All 17 bioactive strains were investigated for the presence of PKS-I, PKS-II, and NRPS genes. Frequencies of positive PCR amplification of the three biosynthetic systems were 29.41%, 70.59%, and 23.53%, respectively (Table5). All these three genes were detected in two strains (HUST003, HUST004), which were identified as members of the genusStreptomyces. PKS-II gene was detected at highest frequencies in bothStreptomyces and non-Streptomycetes genera, while PKS-I and NRPS genes were detected only in the genusStreptomyces.


## 4. Discussion

The plant sourceD. cochinchinensis is known for the production of dragon’s blood [11]. Traditional practices of folk medicine involved extraction of dragon’s blood from the plant. During its extraction, large scale exploitation of the plant is necessary owing to the low yield of plant’s extract and slow growth of the plant, thereby resulting in destruction of large number of century old plant [13]. It is, therefore, imperative to search for alternative source of the plant’s metabolites to preserve the plant in its natural niche. One such means is to study the endophytic microbes associated with the plant. In an earlier study by Cui et al. [35],D. cochinchinensis collected from Beijing, China, had been used to study the endophytic fungal diversity. The study resulted in the isolation of 49 fungal strains distributed into 18 genera. In another study of endophytic microbe associated withD. cochinchinensis, Khieu et al. [10] had isolated aStreptomyces strain, producing two potent cytotoxic compounds, from plant samples collected from Cuc Phuong National Park, Ninh Binh province, Vietnam. But neither of these studies described the diversity profile of the Actinobacteria communities living in association with the plant. As endophytic Actinobacteria from medicinal plants have been a major research area in the search of new antibiotic-producing strains [4, 7, 8, 36–39], we have selected the same plant source for in-depth analysis of Actinobacteria community structure. The present study resulted in the isolation of 304 Actinobacteria strains.Many reports suggested that maximum endophytes were recovered from roots, followed by stems and leaves [9, 31–34]. Similar observation was found during our study whereby more number of isolates was obtained from roots than from stems or leaves (Table 6). This may be due to the fact that rhizospheric regions of the soil have higher concentration of nutrients. A report also suggested that microorganism enters various tissues of plant from rhizosphere and switched to endophytic lifestyles [40, 41]. Isolation of more isolates using the second method may be attributed to the enrichment of the samples with calcium carbonate. Qin et al. [7] have reported that calcium carbonate altered the pH to alkaline conditions which favour the growth of Actinobacteria.Table 6
Comparative endophytic Actinobacteria diversity profile from different plant sources.
Plant sources
Number of isolates from different tissues
Diversityprofile∗
Reference
Leaves
Roots
Stems
Others
Artemisia annua(Yunnan, China)
/
/
/
/
Streptomyces (123); Promicromonospora (26); Pseudonocardia (15); Nocardia (11); Nonomuraea (10); Rhodococcus (8); Kribbella (7); Micromonospora (7); Actinomadura (6); Amycolatposis (3); Streptosporangium (3); Dactylosporangium (2); Blastococcus (1); Glycomyces (1); Gordonia (1); Kocuria (1); Microbispora (1); Micrococcus (1); Phytomonospora (1)
[6]
Maytenus austroyunnanensis(Yunnan, China)
102
126
84
/
Streptomyces (208); Pseudonocardia (22); Nocardiopsis (21); Micromonospora (17); Promicromonospora (6); Streptosporangium (6); Actinomadura (4); Amycolatopsis (4); Nonomuraea (4); Mycobacterium (3); Glycomyces (2); Gordonia (2); Microbacterium (2); Plantactinospora (2); Saccharopolyspora (2); Tsukamurella (2); Cellulosimicrobium (1); Janibacter (1); Jiangella (1); Nocardia (1); Polymorphospora (1)
[9]
36 plant species (Chiang Mai, Thailand)
97
212
21
/
Streptomyces (277); Microbispora (14); Nocardia (8); Micromonospora (4); uncharacterized (27)
[31]
Azadirachta indicaA. Juss. (Varanasi, India)
12
30
13
/
Streptomyces (27); Streptosporangium (8); Microbispora (6); Streptoverticillium (3); Saccharomonospora (3); Nocardia (2)
[32]
7 plant species (Mizoram, India)
6
22
9
2
Streptomyces (23); Microbacterium (9); Leifsonia (1); Brevibacterium (1); Uncharacterized (3)
[33]
26 species (Sichuan, China)
78
326
156
/
Streptomyces, Micromonospora, Nonomuraea, Oerskovia, Promicromonospora, Rhodococcus
[34]
Dracaena cochinchinensis Lour. (China and Vietnam)
74
117
113
/
Streptomyces (264); Nocardiopsis (15); Brevibacterium (5); Microbacterium (5); Tsukamurella (5); Arthrobacter (2); Brachybacterium (2); Nocardia (2); Rhodococcus (2); Kocuria (1); Nocardioides (1); Pseudonocardia (1)
This study
N
u
m
b
e
r
∗ within parentheses indicates the number of strains from each genera; / indicates no data.Among various genera isolated,Streptomycesis predominantly present in the plantD. cochinchinensis. The finding is consistent with similar studies of endophytic bacteria [6, 9, 32, 33, 36]. In the present study, rare Actinobacteria of the generaArthrobacter,Brevibacterium,Kocuria, Microbacterium,Nocardia,Nocardioides,Nocardiopsis, Pseudonocardia,Rhodococcus, andTsukamurellawere also isolated. ThoughArthrobacter,Brevibacterium,Microbacterium,Nocardia,Nocardioides,Nocardiopsis,Pseudonocardia,Rhodococcus, andTsukamurella have been reported as endophytic Actinobacteria of medicinal plant [6, 7, 31–34], this study forms the first report for the isolation ofBrachybacteriumandKocuria (Table 6).Endophytic Actinobacteria are often associated with antimicrobial properties [6, 7, 31]. This is shown by the high proportion of antibacterial activities by endophytic Actinobacteria associated withD. cochinchinensisLour.: 23.03% against ATCC 35984, 23.26% against ATCC 25923, 25% against ATCC 29213, 23.68% against ATCC 13883, 32.43% against ATCC 7966, and 17.43% against ATCC 25922. Based on the preliminary bioactivity profile, a set of 17 Actinobacteria were further studied for antifungal and cytotoxic properties. Of the 17 strains selected, 10 strains were significant againstF. graminearum, seven againstA. carbonarius, and four againstA. westerdijkiae. Similar findings have been reported in related studies ofStreptomycesstrains [42–44]. Four strains (HUST003, HUST004, HUST005, and HUST026) showed remarkable antifungal activity against all test fungi (Table 5). In contrast to above strains, HUST002, HUST006, HUST008, HUST009, HUST013, HUST015, and HUST017 did not show any antifungal activity.In the study of Cui et al. [35], it was indicated that 71% of the fungal isolates obtained fromD. cochinchinensis exhibited varied antitumor activities against five human cancer cell lines: HepG2, MCF7, SKVO3, Hl-60, and 293-T. Similarly, in the study of Khieu et al. [10], the compounds (Z)-tridec-7-3n3-1,2,13-tricarboxylic acid and Actinomycin-D produced by aStreptomycessp. exhibited cytotoxic effect against two human cancer cell lines HepG2 and MCF-7. During the current study, three of theStreptomyces strains (HUST001, HUST004, and HUST005) produced potential cytotoxic activities. All the three studies onD. cochinchinensis indicated that the endophytic microbes associated with the plant are alternative sources for extraction of cytotoxic compounds. These studies further indicated that endophytic microbes can serve as a means for sustainable utilization of the plant resources by preserving the natural niche.The cytotoxic abilities (IC50-values) of the three strains HUST001, HUST004, and HUST005 against the human cancer cell lines MCF-7 and/or Hep G2 range in between 3 and 33 μg·mL−1. This finding is significant with reference to related studies [44–47]. Lu and Shen [45] isolated naphthomycin K from endophyticStreptomycesstrain CS which exhibit cytotoxic activity against P388 and A-549 cell lines with IC50-values of 0.07 and 3.17 μmol·L−1. Kim et al. [48] isolated salaceyins A and B fromStreptomyces laceyi MS53 having IC50-values of 3.0 and 5.5 μg·mL−1 against human breast cancer cell line SKBR3.The biosynthetic genes are involved in microbial natural product biosynthesis. The antitumor drug bleomycin fromStreptomyces verticillusATCC 15003 involved a hybrid NRPS-PKS system [49]. Genomic analysis of the specific strain will, however, be necessary for illustration of the presence of biosynthetic gene clusters. Despite this fact, positive reaction for the amplification of specific domains for the three biosynthetic gene clusters is an indirect indication for the presence of the biosynthetic gene. In the present study, 13 of the 17 bioactive strains were found to have at least one of the three biosynthetic gene clusters. Among them, strains HUST003 and HUST004 showed positive results for the presence of PKS-I, PKS-II, and NRPS genes and also exhibited antifungal activity against all test pathogens (Table 5). Strains HUST006, HUST008, and HUST017 were negative both for the presence of PKS-I, PKS-II, and NRPS genes and for antifungal activity. The results indicated that the antifungal metabolites of these bioactive strains might be products of these biosynthetic genes. Li et al. [4] and Qin et al. [7] had reported that number of isolates having antimicrobial property need not correlate with the percentage of isolates showing the presence of PKS and NRPS gene and vice versa. Strains HUST002, HUST009, HUST013, and HUST015 did not show any antifungal activity but they encoded at least one of these biosynthetic genes. Similarly strain HUST014 was absent for PKS or NRPS gene products but showed antifungal activity.


## 5. Conclusions

Relatively fewer studies have been done to explore the endophytic microbes associated with medicinal plant. This study showed that endophytic Actinobacteria associated with the medicinal plantD. cochinchinensisLour. could be an alternate source for production of bioactive compounds that were previously obtained from the medicinal plant. It thereby provides a sustainable way of utilizing the medicinal plant without destroying the plant.



---

*Source: 1308563-2017-04-06.xml*