# Oxidation Prevention Properties of Reduced Graphene Oxide Mixed with 1-Octanethiol-Coated Copper Nanopowder Composites

Authors: Danee Cho; Dahyun Choi; Youngjun Pyo; Rajendra C. Pawar; Yongil Kim; Eric H. Yoon; Caroline Sunyong Lee
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

1-Octanethiol-coated Cu nanoparticles were mixed with reduced graphene oxide (rGO) to fabricate Cu nanoinks with enhanced oxidation prevention. Graphene oxide (GO) was synthesized using modified Hummer’s method and rGO was reduced from GO using hydrazine hydrate. Copper nanoinks were fabricated with varying concentrations of rGO (Cu : rGO ratios of 100 : 1, 500 : 1, and 1000 : 1 wt.%). The coating layers on the copper nanoparticles and rGO were observed using transmission electron microscopy and characterized by X-ray photoemission spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and Raman spectroscopy. It was observed that surface roughness increased as the concentration of rGO in Cu patterns increased, and an optimized Cu : rGO weight ratio of 1,000 : 1 was established. After sintering, the electrical properties and corrosion resistance of copper patterns both with and without rGO were measured and monitored for 200 days. The copper pattern with rGO (Cu : rGO = 1,000 : 1) was found to maintain its initial resistivity (1.63 × 10−7 Ω·m) for 150 days. Corrosion tests were conducted to confirm the oxidation prohibition of rGO. The resistance polarization (
R
p
) of the copper pattern was measured to be 1.5 times higher than that of the copper pattern without rGO. Thus, rGO was shown to prevent oxidation and improve the conductivity of copper patterns.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Copper nanoparticles have been studied extensively for conductive inks due to their thermal and electrical conductivity and low cost. However, copper nanoparticles are easily oxidized, limiting their conductivity after sintering. Polymer coating to prohibit oxidation represents the most studied method for improving the performance of copper nanoparticles [1–5]; however, these coatings can only prevent oxidation before sintering and need to be removed after the sintering process. Graphene can be used for corrosion protection to overcome the limitations of existing protective coatings. Graphene has better electrical and thermal properties compared to copper and is chemically stable [5–7]; therefore, it can prevent oxidation of copper while improving its inherent conductivity [1, 2, 8]. Previous studies on graphene for oxidation prevention were conducted using graphene film fabricated using chemical vapor deposition. However, this fabrication method has limitations such as a high processing cost and difficulties in mass production, and because of the high processing temperature, transition metal catalysts for graphene formation, such as Cu, Ni, and Pd nanoparticles, lose their shape [9]. Therefore, oxidation prevention using graphene film has only been possible for film-type metals thus far [1, 10].In previous studies, copper nanoparticles have been coated with a 1-Octanethiol vapor self-assembled multilayer (VSAM) to prohibit oxidation before sintering; the particles were successfully dispersed in the 1-Octanol solvent without the use of a dispersant [11, 12]. In this study, copper nanoinks were fabricated by adding reduced graphene oxide (rGO) to prevent oxidation. Sintering of copper nanoinks mixed with rGO in a range of mixture ratios was studied to establish the effect of rGO on the electrical properties and corrosion resistivity of copper nanoparticles. After sintering, enhanced electrical properties through oxidation prevention were confirmed.


## 2. Experimental Process

### 2.1. Synthesis of Copper Nanopowders and rGO

Copper nanopowders with a 100 nm particle size were synthesized using the polyol method described in previous studies. After powder synthesis, the Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) layer coating on the nanopowders was removed using methanol and toluene [13]. These processes were conducted in a glove box under Ar gas conditions to minimize oxidation. After removal of the PVP coating, the surface of the copper nanopowder was coated with 1-Octanethiol using a dry coating system [12]. Coating cycles were conducted six times at 5 minutes per cycle under a high vacuum (4.0 × 10−6 torr). GO was synthesized using Hummer’s method, and rGO was synthesized by GO reduction using hydrazine hydrate [14, 15]. The 1-Octanethiol coating on copper nanoparticles and the thickness and shape of rGO sheets were observed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy were used to confirm the successful reduction of GO to rGO. Finally, thickness and roughness of the fabricated copper patterns were measured for comparison using a profiler(ET200, Kosaka, Japan).


### 2.2. Fabrication and Characterization of Copper Nanoink with rGO

Copper nanoink was fabricated by mixing 1-Octanethiol-coated copper nanopowders with rGO. 1-Octanol was used as the solvent because of its dispersion stability with 1-Octanethiol-coated copper nanoparticles [11]; therefore, the ink was fabricated without any dispersion stabilizer or surfactant. To confirm the effect of rGO on copper nanoink, mixtures with ratios (wt.%) of copper nanopowders to rGO of 100 : 1, 500 : 1, and 1000 : 1 were composed. The concentration of copper nanoparticles with rGO in the Octanol solvent was 20 wt.%. To disperse rGO sheets in the copper nanoink, rGO was mixed with 1-Octanol and dispersed for 1 hr, and the rGO/1-Octanol solution was then mixed with the copper nanoparticles. The completed ink solution was then dispersed using an ultrasonic generator for 30 minutes. After dispersion, 3 mL of copper nanoink was dropped onto a glass substrate to make a pattern size of 2 × 2 cm2.Sintering was conducted under H2 gas (500 sccm) at a heating rate of 5°C/min (Figure 1) [16]. The line resistivity of the sintered patterns was measured immediately after sintering and monitored for 200 days. Finally, the corrosion resistance was measured in 3 wt.% NaCl aqueous solution.Figure 1
Sintering profile of copper patterns.


## 2.1. Synthesis of Copper Nanopowders and rGO

Copper nanopowders with a 100 nm particle size were synthesized using the polyol method described in previous studies. After powder synthesis, the Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) layer coating on the nanopowders was removed using methanol and toluene [13]. These processes were conducted in a glove box under Ar gas conditions to minimize oxidation. After removal of the PVP coating, the surface of the copper nanopowder was coated with 1-Octanethiol using a dry coating system [12]. Coating cycles were conducted six times at 5 minutes per cycle under a high vacuum (4.0 × 10−6 torr). GO was synthesized using Hummer’s method, and rGO was synthesized by GO reduction using hydrazine hydrate [14, 15]. The 1-Octanethiol coating on copper nanoparticles and the thickness and shape of rGO sheets were observed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy were used to confirm the successful reduction of GO to rGO. Finally, thickness and roughness of the fabricated copper patterns were measured for comparison using a profiler(ET200, Kosaka, Japan).


## 2.2. Fabrication and Characterization of Copper Nanoink with rGO

Copper nanoink was fabricated by mixing 1-Octanethiol-coated copper nanopowders with rGO. 1-Octanol was used as the solvent because of its dispersion stability with 1-Octanethiol-coated copper nanoparticles [11]; therefore, the ink was fabricated without any dispersion stabilizer or surfactant. To confirm the effect of rGO on copper nanoink, mixtures with ratios (wt.%) of copper nanopowders to rGO of 100 : 1, 500 : 1, and 1000 : 1 were composed. The concentration of copper nanoparticles with rGO in the Octanol solvent was 20 wt.%. To disperse rGO sheets in the copper nanoink, rGO was mixed with 1-Octanol and dispersed for 1 hr, and the rGO/1-Octanol solution was then mixed with the copper nanoparticles. The completed ink solution was then dispersed using an ultrasonic generator for 30 minutes. After dispersion, 3 mL of copper nanoink was dropped onto a glass substrate to make a pattern size of 2 × 2 cm2.Sintering was conducted under H2 gas (500 sccm) at a heating rate of 5°C/min (Figure 1) [16]. The line resistivity of the sintered patterns was measured immediately after sintering and monitored for 200 days. Finally, the corrosion resistance was measured in 3 wt.% NaCl aqueous solution.Figure 1
Sintering profile of copper patterns.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Analysis of Copper Nanopowders and rGO

Figure2 shows SEM image of the 100 nm sized copper nanopowders which were coated with PVP using polyol method. It was confirmed that the copper nanoparticles were synthesized with Cu nanoparticles’ uniform size and shape as shown in Figure 2. After removal of the PVP coating, 1-Octanethiol layer was entirely formed onto the copper nanopowders using a dry coating system [12]. Figure 3 shows TEM images of 1-Octanethiol-coated nanopowders, with uniform coating. Its diffraction pattern in the inset shows that the surface has not been oxidized. Oxidation prevention by 1-Octanethiol has been discussed previously [16, 17]. Therefore, it was confirmed that 1-Octanethiol layer was successfully coated on surface of each copper nanoparticle via coating system through TEM analysis.Figure 2
SEM image of synthesized copper nanopowders using polyol method.Figure 3
TEM image of (a) 1-Octanethiol-coated copper nanoparticles using dry coating system and (b) one of the copper nanoparticles coated with 1-Octanethiol showing its thickness and its diffraction pattern on the surface (inset).Figure4 shows the shape of the graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets. In the case of rGO, compared to the GO sheet, it was thinner than GO sheet because of forming wrinkles on the surface of rGO sheet during reduction process and GO sheets were separated into thin rGO sheet(Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). In fact, it shows that GO consisted of a minimum of two or more sheets whereas rGO sheet shows clearly thin layer with diffraction pattern shown in Figures 4(c) and 4(d). Therefore, rGO shows a clear and crystalline diffraction pattern because it was almost separated into thin sheets with no overlap. In contrast, the diffraction pattern for the GO sheets is similar to that of the amorphous phase, as shown in the inset of Figure 4(c), due to its overlap as well as functional groups on the GO surface [18].Figure 4
SEM images of (a) graphene oxide and (b) reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and TEM image of (c) graphene oxide, (d) reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and its diffraction patterns (inset).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)To confirm the reduction of GO to rGO, X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy analyses were conducted as shown in Figures5 and 6. The XRD analysis for GO has a sharp peak at around 11° (interlayer distance of 7.5 Å), confirming the exfoliation of the GO sheets due to functional groups on the surface. In contrast, rGO has a broad peak at 20.4°~24.8° (interlayer distance: 4.41~3.50 Å), similar to the interlayer distance of graphene, which is 3.5 Å [19]. Therefore, based on the XRD analysis, it can be confirmed that the rGO sheets have similar properties to graphene and that complete reduction of the GO took place, removing functional groups on the GO surface. The Raman spectra shown in Figure 6 show similar peaks, in agreement with [20].Figure 5
XRD results of graphite flake, GO, and rGO.Figure 6
Raman spectroscopy results of graphite flake, GO, and rGO.The Raman spectrum for graphite has a sharp peak around 1580 cm−1 (G band), indicating the in-plane vibration of sp2 carbon atoms [20]. The peak around 1350 cm−1 is the D band which is caused by a scattered signal at the edge of graphite due to defects [20, 21]. Unlike graphite, GO and rGO have peaks at similar positions; however, the intensity ratio between the D and G band differs between GO and graphite sheets; a higher D band to G band intensity ratio for GO is observed compared to that of graphite, because the functional group on the surface of GO changes the structure of the graphite sheet and increases the intensity of the D band [22, 23]. For rGO, the intensity of the D band is higher than that of the G band, whereas the opposite D to G band ratio is found for GO. This is because toxic nitrogen gas, evolved during the reduction from GO to rGO, becomes absorbed on the rGO surface [22, 24].


### 3.2. Electrical Properties of Copper with rGO

To compare the effect of rGO on copper patterns, the electrical properties of copper patterns both with and without rGO were characterized by measuring line resistivities. The initial resistivities of copper patterns with rGO (Cu : rGO = 500 : 1 and 1,000 : 1) were measured to be 1.32 × 10−7 Ω·m and 1.33 × 10−7 Ω·m, respectively. These values were lower than that of the copper pattern without rGO, as shown in Table 1.Table 1
Line resistivities of copper patterns with varying weight ratio of rGO.
Average line resistivities (×10−7 Ω⋅m)
Cu : rGO (wt.%)
100 : 1
2.45 ± 0.33
500 : 1
1.62 ± 0.51
1000 : 1
1.63 ± 0.33
100% Cu
2.38 ± 0.34Resistivities were monitored for 40 days to compare differences among various patterns. Figure7 shows changes in line resistivity with time for copper patterns without rGO and with rGO at each ratio. The line resistivity of the copper pattern with a 1,000 : 1 Cu : rGO ratio shows very little change over time; in contrast, the other Cu patterns (500 : 1 and 100 : 1 Cu : rGO ratios) show significant changes. Significant differences in the resistivity trend were observed upon comparing the line resistivity of the Cu pattern with a 1,000 : 1 ratio to that without rGO. It is confirmed that an optimized Cu : rGO mixture ratio exists and that this optimized ratio in a copper pattern can enhance electrical properties and prevent oxidation over time.Figure 7
Line resistivity measurement results of copper patterns with varying rGO concentrations (wt.%) of Cu : rGO = 100 : 1, Cu : rGO = 500 : 1, and Cu : rGO = 1,000 : 1 and no rGO (only Cu pattern), over 40 days.Figure8 shows its correlation between amount of rGO added and roughness of patterns using profiler. The copper pattern without rGO has lower roughness than copper patterns with varying rGO wt.% of Cu : rGO = 100 : 1 and Cu : rGO = 500 : 1. Overall, the copper patterns with high wt.% of rGO show the increasing trend of surface roughness. To further investigate the cause, SEM analysis was performed in order to identify the effect of rGO on the surface roughness of copper patterns as shown in Figure 9.Figure 8
The thickness with roughness of copper patterns with varying rGO concentrations (wt.%) of Cu : rGO = 100 : 1, Cu : rGO = 500 : 1, and Cu : rGO = 1,000 : 1 and no rGO (only Cu pattern).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 9
SEM images showing surface of copper patterns with varying rGO concentrations (wt.%) of (a) Cu : rGO = 100 : 1, (b) Cu : rGO = 500 : 1, and (c) Cu : rGO = 1,000 : 1 and (d) no rGO (only Cu pattern).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)SEM was used to study its effect of incorporating rGO into 1-Octanethiol-coated Cu nanoparticles on the surface roughness, as shown in Figure9. For Cu patterns with 1,000 : 1 Cu : rGO ratio in wt.%, rGO sheets seem to be well-dispersed in the Cu pattern. However, as the mixing ratio of adding rGO increases from 1,000 : 1 to 100 : 1, there is an increase in agglomerated rGO sheets on the surface, leaving porous structure that will affect electrical properties. This indicates that rGO sheets were not dispersed uniformly as the mixing ratio increased. Moreover, topology of Cu patterns without rGO (Figure 9(d)) seems to be more porous than the one for Cu pattern with 1000 : 1 Cu : rGO ratio in weight % (Figure 9(c)). Based on these results, it was confirmed that there is optimum amount of rGO, minimizing its surface roughness of copper patterns which was found to be 1,000 : 1 Cu : rGO ratio in weight %. As shown in the roughness data in Figure 8, the Cu pattern, with Cu : rGO being 1000 : 1 in wt.%, seems to have the lowest roughness value, compared to that of Cu pattern without rGO. This profiler result can be confirmed using SEM images showing the surface of various Cu patterns, as shown in Figure 9. The Cu patterns without rGO seem to be porous with agglomeration among themselves, leaving porous structure. However, these pores seem to be filled by rGO with its minimum amount of 1/1000 in wt.%. If the amount of rGO goes beyond 1000 : 1 in Cu : rGO ratio in weight percent, the roughness seems to increase, leaving those extra rGO on the surface. These seem to give more porous structure with rougher surface, compared to the ones with no rGO and rGO added with its Cu : rGO ratio of 1000 : 1. For the case of rGO with its Cu : rGO weight ratio of 100 : 1, the excessive amount of rGO is exposed on the surface, resulting in the formation of cracks, as shown in Figure 9(a). Therefore, this rough surface resulted in significant change in the resistivity of copper patterns over time, as shown in Figure 7. Therefore, well-dispersed rGO seems to induce electrical stability in the copper patterns by preventing oxidation, and the optimum Cu : rGO ratio for good dispersion is found to be 1,000 : 1 in wt.%.


### 3.3. Corrosion Resistance of rGO

#### 3.3.1. Long Term Measurement of Electrical Resistivities

After establishing the optimum concentration of rGO in Cu patterns, the line resistivity of the pattern with the 1,000 : 1 (Cu : rGO) mixture ratio as well as the pattern without rGO was observed for 200 days (Figure10). The line resistivity of the copper pattern with rGO showed very little change for 130 days and increased slightly after 150 days; in contrast, the copper pattern without rGO showed unstable changes in resistivity for the first 50 days, which dramatically increased after this time. The copper pattern without rGO partially oxidized within the first time period and underwent significant oxidization after 50 days, resulting in a rapid increase in line resistivity. Error bars for the line resistivity time series are also shown in Figure 10, and a significant difference in standard deviation between the two copper patterns can be observed. The standard deviation of the copper pattern without rGO was three times that of the copper pattern with rGO over the first 50 days, and this difference increased more than tenfold after 50 days. Therefore, the copper pattern incorporating an optimized rGO concentration showed remarkable stability in electrical resistivity as well as a small standard deviation.Figure 10
Average line resistivity measurement of the copper patterns over 200 days.


#### 3.3.2. Corrosion Resistance

To further investigate the corrosion resistance characteristics of Cu patterns with and without rGO, electrochemical corrosion tests were performed in 3 wt.% NaCl aqueous solution to obtain polarization curves through Tafel extrapolation, as shown in Figure11. Polarization curves and polarization resistance, R
p, were calculated using the Stern-Geary equation, to relate polarization resistance to charge transfer resistance. R
p for the copper pattern with rGO at a Cu : rGO ratio of 1,000 : 1 was measured to be −1.1 × 108 while R
p for the copper pattern without rGO was measured to be −7.0 × 107. The copper pattern with rGO has R
p value 1.5 times higher than that of the pattern without rGO. A higher R
p value indicates interrupted polarization and better corrosion resistance; hence, this result supports the conclusion that the copper pattern with rGO has better oxidation inhibition properties than the pattern without rGO.Figure 11
Polarization curve of copper patterns measured in 3 wt.% NaCl aqueous solution.


## 3.1. Analysis of Copper Nanopowders and rGO

Figure2 shows SEM image of the 100 nm sized copper nanopowders which were coated with PVP using polyol method. It was confirmed that the copper nanoparticles were synthesized with Cu nanoparticles’ uniform size and shape as shown in Figure 2. After removal of the PVP coating, 1-Octanethiol layer was entirely formed onto the copper nanopowders using a dry coating system [12]. Figure 3 shows TEM images of 1-Octanethiol-coated nanopowders, with uniform coating. Its diffraction pattern in the inset shows that the surface has not been oxidized. Oxidation prevention by 1-Octanethiol has been discussed previously [16, 17]. Therefore, it was confirmed that 1-Octanethiol layer was successfully coated on surface of each copper nanoparticle via coating system through TEM analysis.Figure 2
SEM image of synthesized copper nanopowders using polyol method.Figure 3
TEM image of (a) 1-Octanethiol-coated copper nanoparticles using dry coating system and (b) one of the copper nanoparticles coated with 1-Octanethiol showing its thickness and its diffraction pattern on the surface (inset).Figure4 shows the shape of the graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets. In the case of rGO, compared to the GO sheet, it was thinner than GO sheet because of forming wrinkles on the surface of rGO sheet during reduction process and GO sheets were separated into thin rGO sheet(Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). In fact, it shows that GO consisted of a minimum of two or more sheets whereas rGO sheet shows clearly thin layer with diffraction pattern shown in Figures 4(c) and 4(d). Therefore, rGO shows a clear and crystalline diffraction pattern because it was almost separated into thin sheets with no overlap. In contrast, the diffraction pattern for the GO sheets is similar to that of the amorphous phase, as shown in the inset of Figure 4(c), due to its overlap as well as functional groups on the GO surface [18].Figure 4
SEM images of (a) graphene oxide and (b) reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and TEM image of (c) graphene oxide, (d) reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and its diffraction patterns (inset).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)To confirm the reduction of GO to rGO, X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy analyses were conducted as shown in Figures5 and 6. The XRD analysis for GO has a sharp peak at around 11° (interlayer distance of 7.5 Å), confirming the exfoliation of the GO sheets due to functional groups on the surface. In contrast, rGO has a broad peak at 20.4°~24.8° (interlayer distance: 4.41~3.50 Å), similar to the interlayer distance of graphene, which is 3.5 Å [19]. Therefore, based on the XRD analysis, it can be confirmed that the rGO sheets have similar properties to graphene and that complete reduction of the GO took place, removing functional groups on the GO surface. The Raman spectra shown in Figure 6 show similar peaks, in agreement with [20].Figure 5
XRD results of graphite flake, GO, and rGO.Figure 6
Raman spectroscopy results of graphite flake, GO, and rGO.The Raman spectrum for graphite has a sharp peak around 1580 cm−1 (G band), indicating the in-plane vibration of sp2 carbon atoms [20]. The peak around 1350 cm−1 is the D band which is caused by a scattered signal at the edge of graphite due to defects [20, 21]. Unlike graphite, GO and rGO have peaks at similar positions; however, the intensity ratio between the D and G band differs between GO and graphite sheets; a higher D band to G band intensity ratio for GO is observed compared to that of graphite, because the functional group on the surface of GO changes the structure of the graphite sheet and increases the intensity of the D band [22, 23]. For rGO, the intensity of the D band is higher than that of the G band, whereas the opposite D to G band ratio is found for GO. This is because toxic nitrogen gas, evolved during the reduction from GO to rGO, becomes absorbed on the rGO surface [22, 24].


## 3.2. Electrical Properties of Copper with rGO

To compare the effect of rGO on copper patterns, the electrical properties of copper patterns both with and without rGO were characterized by measuring line resistivities. The initial resistivities of copper patterns with rGO (Cu : rGO = 500 : 1 and 1,000 : 1) were measured to be 1.32 × 10−7 Ω·m and 1.33 × 10−7 Ω·m, respectively. These values were lower than that of the copper pattern without rGO, as shown in Table 1.Table 1
Line resistivities of copper patterns with varying weight ratio of rGO.
Average line resistivities (×10−7 Ω⋅m)
Cu : rGO (wt.%)
100 : 1
2.45 ± 0.33
500 : 1
1.62 ± 0.51
1000 : 1
1.63 ± 0.33
100% Cu
2.38 ± 0.34Resistivities were monitored for 40 days to compare differences among various patterns. Figure7 shows changes in line resistivity with time for copper patterns without rGO and with rGO at each ratio. The line resistivity of the copper pattern with a 1,000 : 1 Cu : rGO ratio shows very little change over time; in contrast, the other Cu patterns (500 : 1 and 100 : 1 Cu : rGO ratios) show significant changes. Significant differences in the resistivity trend were observed upon comparing the line resistivity of the Cu pattern with a 1,000 : 1 ratio to that without rGO. It is confirmed that an optimized Cu : rGO mixture ratio exists and that this optimized ratio in a copper pattern can enhance electrical properties and prevent oxidation over time.Figure 7
Line resistivity measurement results of copper patterns with varying rGO concentrations (wt.%) of Cu : rGO = 100 : 1, Cu : rGO = 500 : 1, and Cu : rGO = 1,000 : 1 and no rGO (only Cu pattern), over 40 days.Figure8 shows its correlation between amount of rGO added and roughness of patterns using profiler. The copper pattern without rGO has lower roughness than copper patterns with varying rGO wt.% of Cu : rGO = 100 : 1 and Cu : rGO = 500 : 1. Overall, the copper patterns with high wt.% of rGO show the increasing trend of surface roughness. To further investigate the cause, SEM analysis was performed in order to identify the effect of rGO on the surface roughness of copper patterns as shown in Figure 9.Figure 8
The thickness with roughness of copper patterns with varying rGO concentrations (wt.%) of Cu : rGO = 100 : 1, Cu : rGO = 500 : 1, and Cu : rGO = 1,000 : 1 and no rGO (only Cu pattern).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 9
SEM images showing surface of copper patterns with varying rGO concentrations (wt.%) of (a) Cu : rGO = 100 : 1, (b) Cu : rGO = 500 : 1, and (c) Cu : rGO = 1,000 : 1 and (d) no rGO (only Cu pattern).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)SEM was used to study its effect of incorporating rGO into 1-Octanethiol-coated Cu nanoparticles on the surface roughness, as shown in Figure9. For Cu patterns with 1,000 : 1 Cu : rGO ratio in wt.%, rGO sheets seem to be well-dispersed in the Cu pattern. However, as the mixing ratio of adding rGO increases from 1,000 : 1 to 100 : 1, there is an increase in agglomerated rGO sheets on the surface, leaving porous structure that will affect electrical properties. This indicates that rGO sheets were not dispersed uniformly as the mixing ratio increased. Moreover, topology of Cu patterns without rGO (Figure 9(d)) seems to be more porous than the one for Cu pattern with 1000 : 1 Cu : rGO ratio in weight % (Figure 9(c)). Based on these results, it was confirmed that there is optimum amount of rGO, minimizing its surface roughness of copper patterns which was found to be 1,000 : 1 Cu : rGO ratio in weight %. As shown in the roughness data in Figure 8, the Cu pattern, with Cu : rGO being 1000 : 1 in wt.%, seems to have the lowest roughness value, compared to that of Cu pattern without rGO. This profiler result can be confirmed using SEM images showing the surface of various Cu patterns, as shown in Figure 9. The Cu patterns without rGO seem to be porous with agglomeration among themselves, leaving porous structure. However, these pores seem to be filled by rGO with its minimum amount of 1/1000 in wt.%. If the amount of rGO goes beyond 1000 : 1 in Cu : rGO ratio in weight percent, the roughness seems to increase, leaving those extra rGO on the surface. These seem to give more porous structure with rougher surface, compared to the ones with no rGO and rGO added with its Cu : rGO ratio of 1000 : 1. For the case of rGO with its Cu : rGO weight ratio of 100 : 1, the excessive amount of rGO is exposed on the surface, resulting in the formation of cracks, as shown in Figure 9(a). Therefore, this rough surface resulted in significant change in the resistivity of copper patterns over time, as shown in Figure 7. Therefore, well-dispersed rGO seems to induce electrical stability in the copper patterns by preventing oxidation, and the optimum Cu : rGO ratio for good dispersion is found to be 1,000 : 1 in wt.%.


## 3.3. Corrosion Resistance of rGO

### 3.3.1. Long Term Measurement of Electrical Resistivities

After establishing the optimum concentration of rGO in Cu patterns, the line resistivity of the pattern with the 1,000 : 1 (Cu : rGO) mixture ratio as well as the pattern without rGO was observed for 200 days (Figure10). The line resistivity of the copper pattern with rGO showed very little change for 130 days and increased slightly after 150 days; in contrast, the copper pattern without rGO showed unstable changes in resistivity for the first 50 days, which dramatically increased after this time. The copper pattern without rGO partially oxidized within the first time period and underwent significant oxidization after 50 days, resulting in a rapid increase in line resistivity. Error bars for the line resistivity time series are also shown in Figure 10, and a significant difference in standard deviation between the two copper patterns can be observed. The standard deviation of the copper pattern without rGO was three times that of the copper pattern with rGO over the first 50 days, and this difference increased more than tenfold after 50 days. Therefore, the copper pattern incorporating an optimized rGO concentration showed remarkable stability in electrical resistivity as well as a small standard deviation.Figure 10
Average line resistivity measurement of the copper patterns over 200 days.


### 3.3.2. Corrosion Resistance

To further investigate the corrosion resistance characteristics of Cu patterns with and without rGO, electrochemical corrosion tests were performed in 3 wt.% NaCl aqueous solution to obtain polarization curves through Tafel extrapolation, as shown in Figure11. Polarization curves and polarization resistance, R
p, were calculated using the Stern-Geary equation, to relate polarization resistance to charge transfer resistance. R
p for the copper pattern with rGO at a Cu : rGO ratio of 1,000 : 1 was measured to be −1.1 × 108 while R
p for the copper pattern without rGO was measured to be −7.0 × 107. The copper pattern with rGO has R
p value 1.5 times higher than that of the pattern without rGO. A higher R
p value indicates interrupted polarization and better corrosion resistance; hence, this result supports the conclusion that the copper pattern with rGO has better oxidation inhibition properties than the pattern without rGO.Figure 11
Polarization curve of copper patterns measured in 3 wt.% NaCl aqueous solution.


## 3.3.1. Long Term Measurement of Electrical Resistivities

After establishing the optimum concentration of rGO in Cu patterns, the line resistivity of the pattern with the 1,000 : 1 (Cu : rGO) mixture ratio as well as the pattern without rGO was observed for 200 days (Figure10). The line resistivity of the copper pattern with rGO showed very little change for 130 days and increased slightly after 150 days; in contrast, the copper pattern without rGO showed unstable changes in resistivity for the first 50 days, which dramatically increased after this time. The copper pattern without rGO partially oxidized within the first time period and underwent significant oxidization after 50 days, resulting in a rapid increase in line resistivity. Error bars for the line resistivity time series are also shown in Figure 10, and a significant difference in standard deviation between the two copper patterns can be observed. The standard deviation of the copper pattern without rGO was three times that of the copper pattern with rGO over the first 50 days, and this difference increased more than tenfold after 50 days. Therefore, the copper pattern incorporating an optimized rGO concentration showed remarkable stability in electrical resistivity as well as a small standard deviation.Figure 10
Average line resistivity measurement of the copper patterns over 200 days.


## 3.3.2. Corrosion Resistance

To further investigate the corrosion resistance characteristics of Cu patterns with and without rGO, electrochemical corrosion tests were performed in 3 wt.% NaCl aqueous solution to obtain polarization curves through Tafel extrapolation, as shown in Figure11. Polarization curves and polarization resistance, R
p, were calculated using the Stern-Geary equation, to relate polarization resistance to charge transfer resistance. R
p for the copper pattern with rGO at a Cu : rGO ratio of 1,000 : 1 was measured to be −1.1 × 108 while R
p for the copper pattern without rGO was measured to be −7.0 × 107. The copper pattern with rGO has R
p value 1.5 times higher than that of the pattern without rGO. A higher R
p value indicates interrupted polarization and better corrosion resistance; hence, this result supports the conclusion that the copper pattern with rGO has better oxidation inhibition properties than the pattern without rGO.Figure 11
Polarization curve of copper patterns measured in 3 wt.% NaCl aqueous solution.


## 4. Conclusion

The effect of adding rGO to copper patterns was studied. Copper nanoinks were fabricated by mixing rGO with Cu particles in varying weight ratios. Before ink fabrication, copper nanoparticles were coated with 1-Octanethiol VSAM to minimize oxidation before sintering. To confirm the effect of rGO on copper patterns, copper nanoinks were fabricated with varying concentrations of rGO (Cu : rGO ratios of 100 : 1, 500 : 1, and 1,000 : 1 (wt.%)). After sintering, the electrical properties and corrosion resistance of copper patterns with and without rGO were measured and monitored for 200 days. The trend of electrical properties indicated that the surface roughness of copper pattern increased with increasing weight % of rGO. Moreover, the sample surface with higher roughness accelerates the oxidation of Cu pattern over time, resulting in fluctuation. Therefore, well-dispersed rGO seems to induce electrical stability in the copper patterns by preventing oxidation, and the optimum Cu : rGO ratio for good dispersion is found to be 1,000 : 1 wt.%. The copper pattern with rGO (Cu : rGO = 1,000 : 1) was found to maintain its initial resistivity (1.63 × 10−7 Ω·m) for 150 days, whereas the resistivity of the copper pattern without rGO changed significantly after 50 days. Corrosion tests were conducted using 3 wt.% NaCl aqueous solution, and the resistance polarization (
R
p
) of the copper pattern with rGO (Cu : rGO ratio of 1,000 : 1) was measured to be 1.5 times higher than that of the pattern without rGO. It can be concluded that the addition of an optimized amount of rGO to the copper pattern improved oxidation prevention and its electrical conductivity.



---

*Source: 1050183-2016-04-13.xml*