# New MIMO Antenna with Filtration for the Future Multiuser Systems in Satellite Communications

Authors: Chaker Essid; Chafai Abdelhamid; Faris. A. Almalki; Obaid Ali; Hedi Sakli
Journal: Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

This paper emphasizes the function of the split ring resonator (SRR) within the design of ultra-wideband (UWB) antennas. We presented an antenna that belongs to the category of UWB antenna with two rejected bands based on square SRR. At first, we presented a UWB antenna. This antenna is designed to operate in the band 2.3–11.5 GHz. Then, with the integration of two SRR cells, we were capable of filtering the bands 3.7–3.9 GHz and 8.7–8.9 GHz without losing the UWB characteristics outside these rejected bands. Next, to ensure the proper performance of the MIMO system, we studied the use of metamaterials in the design of MIMO (Multiple-Input Multiple-Output) antennas for miniaturization and antenna performance.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The performance of microwave circuits and devices is directly related to the intrinsic properties of the materials of manufacture. In addition, cost and integration constraints require intrinsic properties that are more attractive than those of conventional materials. The arrival of a new category of innovative materials, called “metamaterials,” has broken the laws of physics dealing with wave systems [1]. This prompted the scientific community to study the possibility of breaking technological limits by exploiting the unnatural properties of these metamaterials. Indeed, the new attractive properties of metamaterials have already opened up a promising avenue for designers of microwave components.Research work on these new materials has intensified in recent years, thanks in particular to progress both in electromagnetic modeling and in the mastery of technological production processes [2, 3]. The path to the development of these new materials remains particularly interesting, even though they require suitable studies to be effectively used with microwave narrowband devices. The main drawback of UWB antennas is the partition of their frequency bands with existing narrowband systems such as WLAN and WiMAX due to their wideband characteristics. Therefore, it is important to eliminate interference with neighboring communication systems by using filtering to prevent the transmission or reception of an unwanted signal in a communication system [4]. To do this, the antenna must be able to play the role of a band-cut filter. To meet such a requirement, various ultra-wideband filtered band antennas have been designed by adding slits or stray elements to or near the radiating element [5–7]. The use of metamaterial structures such as the split ring resonator seems to be a very promising solution to meet these needs due to their extraordinary properties. A row of SRR has the filtering property, and once they are properly polarized, they can perfectly prevent signal propagation, thus providing an effective way to reject a frequency band near its resonant frequency [8–10]. For microarray antennas, it is possible to insert the SRR into the radiating element, the ground plane, or the power line [11–13] to obtain the rejected band function. The SRR can also be placed close to the radiant element or power line [14, 15]. A microband line loaded with SRRs, therefore, shows a tape stop feature, and to improve the coupling, the distance between the line and the rings should be as small as possible.Based on the filter model studied by [16], a novel UWB antenna structure is designed with two square split ring resonator cells inserted close to the feedline to provide frequency filtering matching WiMAX and WLAN applications in the frequency bands (3.6−3.8) GHz and (8.7−8.9) GHz. First, we will design a microband antenna working in the band defined by the FCC. The logical follow-up of our methodological approach corresponds to designing two SRR unit cells whose resonance frequencies are well following the WiMAX and WLAN applications. Next, we will study the association of the microband antenna with each SRR cell. The final step is to study the association of the microband antenna with the two SRR cells, the purpose of which is to design a UWB antenna with two rejected frequency bands.For each simulated antenna structure, the position of the cell along the supply line and their orientation is studied by intensive parametric studies to determine the optimal position and orientation of the SRR cell to ensure better electromagnetic coupling in the field near the microribbon line. We conclude the paper by studying a solution based on the use of metamaterials that minimize or stop the diffusion of surface waves, thus decreasing the mutual coupling in an MIMO antenna that has two rejected tapes.


## 2. Antenna Designing

We initially started our design with a classic square printed antenna fed through a microstrip line. The choice of the supply line is based on the fact that this line must have a characteristic impedance of 50 Ω and be suitable for a very large band. The geometric structure of the antenna consists of patches printed on the upper face of the FR4 type substrate. The ground plane is a partial plane printed on the lower surface of the substrate.We made our choice on the FR4 epoxy substrate, its relative dielectric constant is 4.4, and its dissipation factor (tanδ) is 0.02. This choice can be justified by the reason of its availability in our lab. Regarding the height of the substrate, it is h = 1.6 mm. The antenna is electromagnetically powered by a microstrip line. The used ground plane is indeed a partial plan. The values of the parameters calculated for the microstrip line are given in Table 1.Table 1
Basic microstrip line parameters.
ParametersWf (mm)h (mm)εrt (mm)Values3.011.64.40.035Then, the dimensions of the rectangular patch can be determined using the analytical expressions presented in [17].The modulus of the reflection coefficient of the initial patch is less than −10 dB for frequencies in the 2.8–4.3 GHz band and also in the 10.6–11.9 GHz band, but in the 4.3–10.6 GHz band, we note that the reflection coefficient of the module is greater than −10 dB. Therefore, this patch antenna is not well suited to the entire frequency band studied. In the second step, we adjusted the antenna with geometric modifications by introducing notches on the truncated patch at the four corners in order to extend the field of application and thus cover a wide bandwidth [18–20]. Figure 1 shows the dimensions and shape of the initial antenna consisting of a rectangular copper antenna. Lp and Wp are, respectively, the length and the width of the patch of antenna. The final UWB microstrip antenna that we propose is based on a simple shape as shown schematically in Figure 2. The antenna is designed on an epoxy FR-4 type. The ground plane and the radiating element have a thickness of t = 0.035 mm. A narrowband relative to an ultra-wideband antenna is obtained for our initial antenna. Thus, in order to overcome the problem of its bandwidth, which was initially narrow as illustrated in Figure 3, we are making some modifications.Figure 1
(a) Front view of the initial antenna and (b) bottom view of the initial antenna.
(a)(b)Figure 2
(a) Front view of the proposed antenna and (b) bottom view of the proposed antenna.
(a)(b)Figure 3
Reflection coefficient as a function of the frequencies of the basic square antenna.Our major concern about fulfilling the requirements of our goal is to succeed in expanding bandwidth. After parametric studies, the desired structure presented in Figure4(c) was achieved. The design progress of the antenna, from the single square patch to our proposed antenna, is shown in Figure 3.Figure 4
Design progress of the proposed UWB antenna.Figure5 clarifies the effect of each variation on the coefficient of reflection reaching the final antenna; we want to show by this comparison the influence of these modifications on the attitude of the antenna. We notice an improvement in terms of adaptation by cutting a bevel on the corners of the antenna (Figure 3(b)), with a minimal value of about −32 dB and a significant decrease in the S11 level by performing the inverted M slot while widening the bandwidth. The simulation results of the reflection coefficient S11 clearly show an adaptation in the band 2.6–11.90 GHz (S11 ≤ −10 dB), with such a band of over 127%. We, therefore, deduce that the modifications led us to a good structure of UWB. Figure 2 illustrates the final geometry of our antenna.Figure 5
The base antenna’s reflection coefficient, the four-corner truncated antenna, and the final antenna.The various antenna dimensions optimized for operation on wideband from 2.6 to 11.9 GHz are listed in Table2.Table 2
Different values and parameters of the antenna.
ParametersValuesParametersValuesWS30hs1.6Ls38Lf17Wp17Wf3.01Lp25e8.5a12.5d4.25k6.25c4.25n4.87Lg15.6m6.37b7g0.5I0.5Figure6 shows the monopole antenna’s radiation pattern in planes E and H at frequency 6.0 GHz, where one can observe an omnidirectional beam to gain in the order of 4.5 dBi.Figure 6
Antenna radiation diagram simulated at the frequency of 6.0 GHz in planes H (or phi = 0°) and E (or phi = 90°).Figure7 confirms that our antenna’s efficiency is high. Its value surpasses 82% over the entire operating band. This implies that nearly all of the injected energy into the antenna is radiated.Figure 7
The efficiency of the proposed antenna.


## 3. Results and Discussions

For a good validation of the proposed design, a prototype of an antenna is manufactured and measured. Figure8 shows the antenna as manufactured following the above parameters.Figure 8
Prototype of the proposed antenna.The S-parameters of the antenna were calculated using an Agilent Network Analyzer Keysight N5230A PNA-L (300 kHz to 20 GHz). These values are shown in Figure9. By matching the measured and simulated results, we can observe that there is a small frequency shift. This can be the cause of some factors like cable loss, loss of SMA connector, and radiation limits during the measurement procedure. The proposed MIMO antenna’s calculated frequency band is in the range of 2.1–12 GHz with S11 < −10 dB.Figure 9
Reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna.The antenna was put in an anechoic chamber (Figure10) to analyze and measure its radiation. Figure 11 shows this measured radiation pattern in the E and H plane at the 6 GHz frequency, where an omnidirectional beam with a gain of the order of 4.5 dBi can be well observed. On the other hand, a satisfactory agreement between the two simulation results and those of the measurement is noticed in a far field.Figure 10
Device to measure the antenna put in the anechoic chamber.Figure 11
Monopole antenna radiation pattern measured and simulated at the frequency of 6.0 GHz: (a) in the H plane and (b) E plane.
(a)(b)


## 4. Design of SRR Unit Cells

In this part of our paper, we will design two square SRR unit cells, operating in frequencies corresponding to well-defined bands (WiMAX and X-band).Throughout our study, we will use the S-parameter-based method to design and analyze the performance of metamaterial unit cells. The overall cell size should be less than the wavelength (dλ) [21] (around λ0/11 for our case). To do this, we will proceed according to the methodological approach of designing unitary cells. Figure 12 shows the studied resonators. The first SRR is sized for operation in the band of 8.6–8.9 GHz; it consists of two concentric and spaced rings, whose outer ring contains a slot. The dimensions of the second resonator are optimized so that it can work in the band 3.6–3.8 GHz; it consists of a single ring with a cut deposited on the dielectric substrate. All these resonators are copper and deposited on a dielectric substrate of type FR4-epoxy permittivity 4.4 and thickness 1.6 mm, the width of each unit cell is noted by Wi, the width of the copper track is noted by Li, the spacing between two concentric rings is noted by Gi, and the width of the cutting of the rings is noted by Si. All geometric parameters of these SRRs are grouped in Table 3.Figure 12
Configuration of the square SRR cell printed on an FR4 substrate.Table 3
Different values and parameters of the SRRs.
SRR1W1 (mm)S1 (mm)F1 (mm)G1 (mm)L1 (mm)Values2.70.20.20.251.8SRR2W2 (mm)S2 (mm)F2 (mm)Values72.80.6Figures13 and 14 represent transmission (S21) and the coefficients of reflection (S11) in dB following the simulation of the two SRRs cells shown in Figure 12. The results of the simulation of the S-parameters of two cells show, respectively, a cut bandwidth behavior around the frequency of 8.85 GHz and 3.7 GHz. An S11 tends towards 0 dB with an attenuated transmission coefficient (S21) of the order of −18 dB and −14.5 dB, respectively, for cell 1 and cell 2. These results confirm a forbidden band phenomenon around the resonance frequency of each metamaterial cell (i.e., there is no transmission around the resonance frequency of each unit cell).Figure 13
S-parameter (reflection and transmission coefficient) of SRR studied: cell N°1.Figure 14
S-parameter (reflection and transmission coefficient) of SRR studied: cell N°2.


## 5. UWB Antenna Associated with SRR Unit Cells

In this step of our paper, the study focuses on the use of SRRs previously designed with the environment of the UWB antenna, whose aim is to design a UWB antenna with two rejected bands. This is done by placing each resonator close to the power line while performing parametric studies of the resonator orientation and position along the power line to obtain the optimal position, in which the SRR resonator will be well excited. To avoid interference with the WiMAX system from 3.6 to 3.9 GHz, the first SRR resonator is placed near the power line of the previously designed UWB antenna; its position (d1) is varied throughout the power line to obtain the best position; the aim is to satisfy the conditions of excitation of the resonator since notch filtering can be achieved in the bandwidth of the UWB antenna around the resonant frequency of the SRR cells.The best result was obtained in our case with the position of thed1 = 7 mm. The second SRR resonator is also placed near the line at the distance d2 = 13.55 mm, to attenuate the interference signals around 9 GHz and reduce their impact on the UWB system. To avoid interference with the WiMAX system from 3.6 to 3.9 GHz, the first SRR resonator is placed near the power line of the previously designed UWB antenna, its position (d1) is varied throughout the power line to obtain the best position, and the aim is to satisfy the conditions of excitation of the resonator. The best result was obtained in our case with the position of the d1 = 7 mm. The second SRR resonator is also placed near the line at the distance d2 = 13.55 mm, to attenuate the interference signals around 9 GHz and reduce their impact on the UWB system. The geometry of these two structures is shown in Figure 15. The space between the resonators and the supply line is fixed to 0.2 mm; the choice of this value is due to the technological constraints of realization.Figure 15
UWB antenna associated with (a) cell N°1 and (b) cell N°2.
(a)(b)Figures16 and 17 show the reflection coefficients of each UWB antenna structure associated with an SRR resonator, the two simulated structures show a rejected frequency band (S11 > −10 dB), and these bands are identical to the prohibited bands of the previously studied SRRs cells.Figure 16
S-parameter S11 of the UWB antenna associated with cell N°1.Figure 17
S-parameter S11 of the UWB antenna associated with cell N°2.


## 6. Rejected Dual-UWB Antenna

The two SRRs, studied above, are placed in order to provide filtering for the two bands, namely, the WiMAX band 3.6–3.8 GHz and the band from 8.7 to 8.9 GHz. The geometry of our antenna is well mentioned in Figure18.Figure 18
Configuration of the UWB antenna combined with an upstream filtering system with two switchable rejected bands.Figure19 presents the reflection coefficient’s evolution as a function of frequency for the UWB antenna initially presented, as well as the two-band rejected antenna studies. The S-parameter simulation result shows that our antenna operates in the band (2.38−11.30) GHz (S11 <−10 dB), except in the bands (3.68−3.88) GHz and (8 0.7−8.95) GHz where S11 = −2 dB. Behavior band cutter around the resonance frequency of each SRR cell which results in two rejected bands is well noticed, the first band around the 3.7 GHz frequency with a 200 MHz rejected band, and the second around the frequency 8.8 GHz with a rejected band of 250 MHz. These two rejected bands are identical to those obtained in the previous case. We also note that these results clearly show that the integration of these SRR cells does not affect the adaptation of our antenna outside the two rejected bands.Figure 19
UWB antenna reflection coefficient S11: (a) with SRRs and (b) without SRRs.They also showed a stable radiant performance of the device (antenna + filter) as shown in Figure20, due to a decoupling between the filter device and the radiation device. Comparison of the simulated radiation diagrams of the antenna and the device (antenna + filter). All the results show a stable radiant performance with an omnidirectional beam and a gain of 4.5 dBi.Figure 20
Device radiation diagram (monopoly antenna + filter) simulated at 6.0 GHz frequency in H and E planes.For the experimental validation of the antenna model in Figure18, a mock-up is made as shown in Figure 21. The antenna’s frequency characterization is then performed using the Agilent network analyzer N5230A. The results of measurement and simulation of the S-parameter S11 of the rejected band antenna are shown in Figure 22. The comparison of the simulation results with those of the measurement shows a good satisfactory agreement in the first rejected frequency band; however, a gap between the results is noticed in the other band. This is surely due to uncertainties in manufacturing or sizing.Figure 21
Prototype of the MIMO antenna mentioned in Figure 18.Figure 22
Proposed antenna: calculated and measured coefficient S of the antenna.Furthermore, regarding the level of adaptation, the measurement results are better than those of the simulation.


## 7. Reduction of Mutual Coupling Based on Metamaterials

After studying the SRRs previously designed with the UWB antenna environment, these cells will be placed near the antenna whose purpose is to design a dual-UWB antenna. Then, we place two identical dual-band antennas spaced at a distanced = 5 mm (see Figure 23). The impact of a unitary SRR cell network between the two antennas side by side will be studied. So, for this purpose, a network of SRR cells composed of 7 SRRs cells is shown in Figure 24. We attempt to achieve an electromagnetic BlackBerry in order to ensure isolation on the flux and radiation interference from the proximity of the adjacent antenna. Then, using metamaterial, a method was proposed to stop or decrease the propagation of surface waves, thus lowering the mutual coupling in MIMO antennas.Figure 23
Structure of two antennas without SRRs: (a) front view and (b) bottom view.
(a)(b)Figure 24
Antenna structure proposed with SRRs and unit cell chain architecture in front view.


## 8. Isolation between Two MIMO Antennas

Two power ports, port 1 and port 2, are shown in the structure of our two-element MIMO antenna (Figure24). Figure 25 shows the coefficients of the simulated reflections (S11; S22) of our proposed MIMO antenna before the use of metamaterials and after it. It is observed from Figure 25 that the MIMO antenna’s reflection coefficients with and without metamaterial are nearly identical to the entire working band initially presented and that each one of them is below −10 dB on the desired band.Figure 25
S22/S11 of the structure without and with SRRs.In the beginning, before the application of metamaterials to isolate the two antennas, the mutual coupling regarding the transmission coefficient measured at the frequency of 2.5 GHz was −10.8 dB and at a frequency of 11.7 GHz was −11.1 dB between the two antennas. With the coupling technique based on metamaterials used between the two antennas, we notice from Figure 26(a) significant improvement in the parameter S21 (S21<–30dB) over our entire operating band. The mutual coupling between the antennas is therefore significantly reduced. Thus, the requirement to have a mutual coupling less than −20 dB is imposed, to maintain the performance of a MIMO system. Observing Figure26, the transmission coefficients show good transmission quality with low power loss over the entire band. An isolation protection gain greater than 25 dB over the entire band is obtained. This is due to the isolation performance between the antennas. This structure implies an increase in the performance of MIMO system [22–32].Figure 26
Isolation analysis of MIMO antennas with and without metamaterial.It is preferable to study the interferences in our MIMO system caused to near field radiation, the aim of which is to better understand the mutual coupling between the two antennas while analyzing the current distributions on the two elements. The simulated current distributions of antenna 1 at the 6 GHz frequency are shown in Figure27. Note here that when the port of the antenna N°1 is energized, the port of the antenna N°2 ends by a load of 50 Ω. In Figure 27(a), it can be seen that the surface current in the orifice of the exciting element 1 induces currents in the second element through the common ground plane. This generates a strong coupling translated by values ​​of S-parameter S21. For MIMO antennas to function properly, they must be independent with a minimum of coupling; therefore, better isolation is necessary. One effective approach is to work on the MTM to limit the flow of current from one port to another, ultimately reducing the mutual coupling between the two ports. By energizing port 1, for example, the maximum current is on this one. It is then absorbed by the chain of SRRs cells. This proves that there is no (excessive) distribution of current from one to the other and therefore little or no current transfer between the two antennas and allows therefore reducing the coupling between ports, which leads to good mutual isolation. Indeed, we can confirm that significant isolation is ensured between the two antennas with metamaterials.Figure 27
Surface currents on the radiating elements for the case of the excitation of port N°1 with and without MTM.Figure28 presents the results of the ECC correlation envelope obtained by simulation, which is calculated from the S-parameters as explained in the following relation [29]. The ECC, which is given by equation (1), is a very important factor in evaluating the diversity performance of the MIMO system.(1)ECC=S11∗S12+S21∗S2221−S112−S2121−S222−S122.Figure 28
DG and ECC simulated from S-parameters.In a MIMO system, the diversity gain (DG) is a parameter that indicates that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the combined signal is enhanced over the signal-to-noise ratio obtained by a single antenna. The diversity gain (DG) can be calculated as shown in equation (2) [29].(2)DG=101−ECC2.Therefore, the diversity performance of a link can be assessed using the envelope correlation coefficient, which indicates the independence of the received signals, while the diversity gain represents the improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the combined relative signals versus the signal-to-noise ratio received on a single antenna, since the diversity gain (DG) depends to a large extent on the ECC. Two parameters, which are the coupling between the elements and the overall efficiency of the antennas, have a considerable influence on the performance of the antenna systems. They are included in the calculation of the correlation coefficient and the diversity gain as mentioned. We notice that the ECC is very low and that the DG varies between 9 and 10 dB (Figure28). DG is maximum or point or ECC is minimum on the operating band of our MIMO antenna.For the antenna model’s experimental validation of Figure23, a mock-up is carried out as indicated in Figure 29. The frequency characterization of the antenna is then carried out using the Agilent N5230A Keysight PNA-L 300 kHz to 20 GHz network analyzer. The results of the measurement of the S-parameters of the antenna carried out are displayed in Figure 30. The measured and simulated S-parameters of the antenna structure with and without SRR are in good agreement. The impedance bandwidth (S11 <−10 dB) can cover the entire UWB (2–12 GHz). The results of the simulations and those of the measurements also show a good agreement between them and prove that the proposed prototype is well suited with an isolation level of the order of −34 dB over the entire UWB. It is noted here that the deviations are assigned to the manufacturing tolerance and to the loss of connectors. These results clearly show that this antenna is a fair candidate for MIMO operation in the UWB indicated previously.Figure 29
Photos of the manufactured antenna system.Figure 30
S-parameters of the structure with SRRs.Figure31 represents the total efficiency of MIMO antenna with and without SRRs. We note that the total efficiency is between 80% and 90% over the entire frequency band of our MIMO antenna.Figure 31
Total efficiency of each access with and without SRRs (only port 1 is displayed here).Table4 presents a comparison between the proposed MIMO antenna and that in other related works. We notice that the proposed antenna exhibits better efficiency.Table 4
Difference between the MIMO antenna presented and the previous UWB-MIMO antennas.
Ref.Element numberBandwidth (GHz)Dimensions (mm × mm)Gain (dBi)Radiation efficiency (%)ECC[21]13.11–17.5164 × 646----------[22]12.1–1650 × 303.6–681<0,25[29]42.96–10.943 × 432–6.179<0.1[30]45–6.160 × 337.684<0.04Proposed antenna22–12.148 × 352–8.285<0,07


## 9. Conclusion

The main subject of this paper is the study and application of structures based on metamaterials. Our goal in this paper is to analyze and design metamaterials applied on the antennas to avoid interference with the WiMAX system and the X-band and to increase the performances of the antennas in terms of isolation technique between the different elements constituting the MIMO antenna. The results obtained show that these resonators can perfectly prevent the signal propagation near its resonant frequencies, do not affect it elsewhere, and offer advantages such as weight reduction and bulk, which are beneficial for their integration in telecommunication systems.



---

*Source: 1040333-2022-02-24.xml*