# Formation and Identification of Unresolved Complex Mixtures in Lacustrine Biodegraded Oil from Nanxiang Basin, China

Authors: Pengfei Guo; Sheng He; Shukui Zhu; Derong Chai; Shiyan Yin; Wei Dai; Wanfeng Zhang
Journal: The Scientific World Journal
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

A comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC/TOFMS) method has been developed for the formation and identification of unresolved complex mixtures (UCMs) in lacustrine biodegraded oils that with the same source rock, similar maturity, and increasing degradation rank from Nanxiang Basin, China. Normal alkanes, light hydrocarbons, isoprenoids, steranes, and terpanes are degraded gradually from oil B330 to oil G574. The compounds in biodegraded oil (oil G574) have fewer types, the polarity difference of compounds in different types is minor, and the relative content of individual compounds is similar. All the features make the compounds in biodegraded oil coelute in GC analysis and form the raised “baseline hump” named UCMs. By injecting standard materials and analyzing mass spectrums of target compounds, it is shown that cyclic alkanes with one to five rings are the major components of UCMs. Furthermore, UCMs were divided into six classes. Classes I and II, composed of alkyl-cyclohexanes, alkyl-naphthanes, and their isomers, are originated from the enrichment of hydrocarbons resistant to degradation in normal oils. Classes III ~ VI, composed of sesquiterpenoids, tricyclic terpanes, low molecular steranes, diasteranes, norhopanes, and their isomers, are probably from some newly formed compounds during the microbial transformation of oil.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Biodegraded oils exist widely in many oil and gas basins in the world. According to the statistics, 10% of global oil reserves have been degraded and another 10% have suffered varying degrees of biodegradation [1]. Although it is more difficult to be exploited than normal oil, biodegraded oil has still drawn great attentions as an important type of crude oil. The biodegradation of crude oil is essentially an oxidation reaction associated with microbes. The volume and API of biodegraded oil are smaller, while its density, viscosity, and content of nonhydrocarbon gases, resin, and trace elements are bigger than those of normal oil [2–4]. Another feature of biodegraded oils is the “baseline hump” in gas chromatograms. It has been concluded that the “hump” contains thousands of compounds named as unresolved complex mixtures (UCMs) [5]. Ventura et al. (2008) analyzed UCMs in a bitumen sample from late Archean sediments using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC), and the results showed that early- to mid-eluting UCMs were dominated by polycyclic compounds, and late eluting UCMs were composed of C
36
~
C
40-mono-, bi-, and tricyclic isoprenoids [6]. UCMs also exist in the artificially weathered Norwegian Sea crude oil, and Melbye et al. (2009) identified them as cyclic and aromatic sulfoxide compounds and benzothiophenes [7]. Additionally, UCMs in oils with different degradation levels usually have different features. Tran et al. (2010) studied a group of oils with different sources and degradation ranks in order to describe the oil biodegradation and identify the composition of UCMs [8]. It was proposed that alkyl-decahydronaphthalenes constitute a significant contribution to UCMs. Wang et al. (2012) analyzed UCMs in the heavy oils from Liaohe oilfield of China [9]. The results suggested that UCMs can be divided into two parts (C
24
- and C24+). The former is composed of monocyclic, bicyclic, and tricyclic alkanes and the latter is mainly composed of tetracyclic and pentacyclic alkanes. However, there are still lots of works that need to be done in order to determine the formation and composition of UCMs in biodegraded oil.In this study, UCMs in five lacustrine biodegraded oils with different biodegradation ranks from Nanxiang Basin, China, were separated with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC/TOFMS) and identified by standard materials validation, structured chromatograms, and mass spectrums of target compounds. The geochemical characteristics, degradation ranks of the biodegraded oils, and formation and identification of UCMs were studied in detail.


## 2. Geological Setting

The Mesozoic to Cenozoic Biyang depression is one of the depressions in Nanxiang Basin, which is a typical lacustrine basin located in Henan Province, Eastern China. Biyang depression can be divided into three structural units, the northern slope, the middle depression, and the southern steep slope (Figure1). The metamorphites in Qinling and Erlangping group of the north Qinling fold belt are the basement of the depression. This basement is overlain by series of sedimentary formations, such as the Eocene Dacangfang formation, the Eocene to Oligocene Hetaoyuan formation (Eh), the Oligocene Liaozhuang formation, and the Miocene Fenghuangzhen formation [10–12]. Hetaoyuan formation was formed in the rift stage of the depression and can be divided into the upper (Eh1), the middle (Eh2) and the lower (Eh3). Eh3 in the middle depression was deposited in a deep lacustrine environment and was up to 2000 m thick. Black to grey mudstones were the dominant lithology of Eh3, with the high abundance of organic matter and the appropriate maturity [13]. Therefore, the Eh3 is the major source rocks of Biyang depression. Eh3 in the edge of the depression was deposited in a deltaic sedimentary environment (fan delta and braid river delta), and the dominant lithology was sandstones, a good reservoir of the northern slope [13]. Oils produced from the reservoirs in northern slope are almost biodegraded oils as their depth is lower than 1000 m.Figure 1
Location, tectonic units, and sampled wells of Biyang depression.


## 3. Experimental Methods

### 3.1. Samples and Chemicals

Five biodegraded oils from the northern slope and one normal oil from the southern steep slope were analyzed (Figure1). Biodegraded oils’ reservoirs are the sandstones in Eh
3
2, with the depth ranging from 263.0 m to 1083.0 m. The six oils’ group compositions are shown in Table 1. The relative content of resin in biodegraded oils (oils B276 to G574) is higher than that of normal oil (oil B330) obviously.Table 1
Reservoirs, depths, and group compositions of oil B330 to oil G574.
Sample
Reservoir
Depth (m)
Saturates (%)
Aromatics (%)
Resin (%)
Asphaltenes (%)
B330
Eh
3
2
1750.0
76.10
9.61
10.86
3.43
B276
Eh
3
2
1083.0
26.82
11.22
54.63
7.31
YJ3624
Eh
3
2
857.0
37.65
25.46
33.48
3.40
Y50714
Eh
3
2
753.0
25.98
19.22
49.35
5.45
L3917
Eh
3
2
282.0
43.10
16.70
36.80
3.39
G574
Eh
3
2
263.0
28.42
16.05
46.85
8.68A suitable amount (35 mg) of oil was dissolved in 30 mL hexane and then mixed for 5 min using ultrasonic wave. The samples need to stand for 12 hours and the asphaltene was filtered. At last, the supernatant was analyzed by GC × GC/TOFMS, GC/MS, and GC, respectively. Standard materials were purchased from J&K Scientific and solvents come from Tedia High Purity Solvent.


### 3.2. Instrumentation and Methods

The GC × GC system consisted of a GC (7890A, Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) equipped with a secondary oven and a quad-jet dual stage modulator. A detailed description of the cold-jet modulator has been made in a previous publication [13, 14]. Two capillary columns were connected serially by means of a Siltek treated universal press-tight connector (Restek Corp., Bellefonte, PA, USA). A time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Pegasus 4D, Leco Corp., St. Joseph, MI, USA) was used to acquire mass spectral data of the effluents from the GC × GC. Data acquisition and processing were performed using a ChromaTOF software version 4.33. The GC/MS system consisted of a 7890A gas chromatograph and a 5975C mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). The GC system consisted of a 7890A gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).In GC × GC/TOFMS analysis, a DB-5MS column (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25μm) and a DB-17Ht column (1.6 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA) were used as the primary and secondary dimensional columns, respectively. The carrier gas was helium (purity ≥ 99.9995%) with a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The injector temperature was 300°C. Injections were performed in the splitless mode, and the injection volume was 1.0 μL. All injections were made with a 7683B series autosampler. The 1st oven temperature was programmed to 60°C (holding for 1 min) and then heated to 310°C at 2°C/min (holding for 30 min). The 2nd oven temperature was 10°C higher than that of the 1st oven. The modulation period and the temperature offset higher than the primary oven temperature of modulator were 6 s and 15°C, respectively. The mass spectrometer was operated at an acquisition rate of 100 spectra per second for a mass range of 50 to 550 u, using electron impact ionization mode at 70 eV and 1500 V multichannel plate voltage. The ion-source temperature was 230°C and the transfer-line temperature was 300°C. The pressure inside the flight tube was 1.1
×
10
-
7 Torr.In GC/MS analysis, a DB-5MS column (50 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25μm, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA) was used. The carrier gas was helium (purity ≥ 99.9995%) with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injector temperature was 300°C. Injections were performed at the splitless mode, and the injection volume was 1.0 μL. All injections were made with a 7683B series autosampler. The oven temperature was programmed to 60°C (holding for 1 min) and then heated to 300°C at 3°C/min (holding for 30 min).In GC analysis, a DB-Petro column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25μm, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA) was used. The carrier gas was nitrogen (purity ≥ 99.9995%). The flow rate, injector temperature, volume, autosampler, and oven temperature program were the same as the GC/MS analysis.


## 3.1. Samples and Chemicals

Five biodegraded oils from the northern slope and one normal oil from the southern steep slope were analyzed (Figure1). Biodegraded oils’ reservoirs are the sandstones in Eh
3
2, with the depth ranging from 263.0 m to 1083.0 m. The six oils’ group compositions are shown in Table 1. The relative content of resin in biodegraded oils (oils B276 to G574) is higher than that of normal oil (oil B330) obviously.Table 1
Reservoirs, depths, and group compositions of oil B330 to oil G574.
Sample
Reservoir
Depth (m)
Saturates (%)
Aromatics (%)
Resin (%)
Asphaltenes (%)
B330
Eh
3
2
1750.0
76.10
9.61
10.86
3.43
B276
Eh
3
2
1083.0
26.82
11.22
54.63
7.31
YJ3624
Eh
3
2
857.0
37.65
25.46
33.48
3.40
Y50714
Eh
3
2
753.0
25.98
19.22
49.35
5.45
L3917
Eh
3
2
282.0
43.10
16.70
36.80
3.39
G574
Eh
3
2
263.0
28.42
16.05
46.85
8.68A suitable amount (35 mg) of oil was dissolved in 30 mL hexane and then mixed for 5 min using ultrasonic wave. The samples need to stand for 12 hours and the asphaltene was filtered. At last, the supernatant was analyzed by GC × GC/TOFMS, GC/MS, and GC, respectively. Standard materials were purchased from J&K Scientific and solvents come from Tedia High Purity Solvent.


## 3.2. Instrumentation and Methods

The GC × GC system consisted of a GC (7890A, Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) equipped with a secondary oven and a quad-jet dual stage modulator. A detailed description of the cold-jet modulator has been made in a previous publication [13, 14]. Two capillary columns were connected serially by means of a Siltek treated universal press-tight connector (Restek Corp., Bellefonte, PA, USA). A time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Pegasus 4D, Leco Corp., St. Joseph, MI, USA) was used to acquire mass spectral data of the effluents from the GC × GC. Data acquisition and processing were performed using a ChromaTOF software version 4.33. The GC/MS system consisted of a 7890A gas chromatograph and a 5975C mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). The GC system consisted of a 7890A gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).In GC × GC/TOFMS analysis, a DB-5MS column (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25μm) and a DB-17Ht column (1.6 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA) were used as the primary and secondary dimensional columns, respectively. The carrier gas was helium (purity ≥ 99.9995%) with a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The injector temperature was 300°C. Injections were performed in the splitless mode, and the injection volume was 1.0 μL. All injections were made with a 7683B series autosampler. The 1st oven temperature was programmed to 60°C (holding for 1 min) and then heated to 310°C at 2°C/min (holding for 30 min). The 2nd oven temperature was 10°C higher than that of the 1st oven. The modulation period and the temperature offset higher than the primary oven temperature of modulator were 6 s and 15°C, respectively. The mass spectrometer was operated at an acquisition rate of 100 spectra per second for a mass range of 50 to 550 u, using electron impact ionization mode at 70 eV and 1500 V multichannel plate voltage. The ion-source temperature was 230°C and the transfer-line temperature was 300°C. The pressure inside the flight tube was 1.1
×
10
-
7 Torr.In GC/MS analysis, a DB-5MS column (50 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25μm, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA) was used. The carrier gas was helium (purity ≥ 99.9995%) with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injector temperature was 300°C. Injections were performed at the splitless mode, and the injection volume was 1.0 μL. All injections were made with a 7683B series autosampler. The oven temperature was programmed to 60°C (holding for 1 min) and then heated to 300°C at 3°C/min (holding for 30 min).In GC analysis, a DB-Petro column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25μm, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA) was used. The carrier gas was nitrogen (purity ≥ 99.9995%). The flow rate, injector temperature, volume, autosampler, and oven temperature program were the same as the GC/MS analysis.


## 4. Results and Discussion

### 4.1. Geochemical Characteristics

#### 4.1.1. Source Rocks

The Eh3 Formation can be divided into the Eh
3
1 and the Eh
3
2. Literatures have shown that biodegraded oils from the Eh
3
2 sandstones in the northern slope came from the Eh
3
2 mudstones [14–16]. The biodegraded oils in this study all come from the Eh
3
2 sandstones, so their source rocks are the same, that is, the Eh
3
2 mudstone.


#### 4.1.2. Maturity

Biomarker maturity indicators, such as sterane maturity index (C29
α
α
α20R/(S + R) and C29
α
β
β/(α
α
α + α
β
β)), are usually used to assess the maturity of oil [17–19]. Steranes and terpanes will not be depleted when the oil degradation rank is lower than 5 [19, 20]. Therefore, the sterane maturity index can be applied to calculating the maturity of oils (degradation rank lower than 5) from the northern slope of Biyang depression. The results show that the oils are low mature oils. In addition, the maturity of the Eh
3
2 source rocks was discussed by Dong et al., and the results suggested that the Ro of the Eh
3
2 is about 0.5% to 0.7% [13]. Through the above analyses we can conclude that biodegraded oils B276 to G574 are low mature oils with similar maturity.


#### 4.1.3. Biomarker Features

The biomarkers of the oils in the northern slope were analyzed by GC/MS. Different parameters of oils (degradation rank lower than 5) are calculated (Table2). The relative content of C27-, C28-, and C29-regular steranes can indicate the original organic matter inputs of source rocks [20]. The dominance of C27-regular sterane indicates the input of aquatic organic matter, C29-regular sterane indicates the input of land-plant organic matter, and C28-regular sterane can reflect the organic matter from the algas [20]. The oils in the northern slope have a relative high content of C27- and C28-regular sterane (0.27~0.32 and 0.31~0.34), which suggests the dominant input of lacustrine organic matter. The composition of tricyclic terpanes is an effective organic matter input index [20]. The oils in the northern slope have a low ratio of C19/C23-tricyclic terpanes or C
19
~
C
22/C
23
~
C
26-tricyclic terpanes and a high ratio of C26-tricyclic terpane/C24-tetracyclic terpane. It also proves the dominance input of lacustrine organic matter. Furthermore, oleanane that represents land plants input was not detected in the oils. Therefore, the oils in the northern slope are typical lacustrine oils.Table 2
Main geochemical parameters of oils from the northern slope.
Oil sample
Y3515
Y50714
YJ3624
B276
G412
C27/C27~C29-steranes
0.32
0.32
0.30
0.27
0.31
C28/C27~C29-steranes
0.33
0.33
0.34
0.33
0.31
C19/C23-tricyclic terpanes
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.12
0.07
C19~C22/C23~C26-tricyclic terpanes
0.62
0.50
0.50
1.17
0.74
C26-tricyclic/C24-tetracyclic terpane
2.24
2.32
2.38
1.72
2.51
C21~C22-pregnanes/(steranes +  diasteranes)
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.03
C19~C29-tricyclic terpanes/M/Z:191
0.29
0.25
0.23
0.32
0.30
C19~C29-tricyclic terpanes/C30-hopane
1.30
1.12
0.97
1.49
1.33
C27~C29-diasteranes/steranes
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
Ts/(Ts + Tm)
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.14
C31~C35-homohopanes/C30-hopane
0.58
0.61
0.60
0.61
0.54In addition, biomarker features can reflect the oil maturity, such asT
s
/
(
T
s
+
T
m
), C
27
~
C
29-diasteranes/steranes, the content of low molecular weight steranes, tricyclic terpanes, and homohopanes [20]. The ratios of T
s
/
(
T
s
+
T
m
), C
31
~
C
35-homohopanes/C30-hopane, C
21
~
C
22-pregnanes/(steranes + diasteranes), C
19
~
C
29-tricyclic terpanes/M/Z: 191, C
19
~
C
29-tricyclic terpanes/C30-hopane, and C
27
~
C
29-diasteranes/steranes are 0.10~0.15, 0.54~0.61, 0.01~0.03, 0.23~0.32, 0.97~1.49, and 0.05~0.06, respectively. All the ratios are relatively low. This also suggests that the oils in the northern slope are low mature oils.


### 4.2. Degradation Rank

Compounds in crude oil have different kinds of capability resisting the biodegradation, especially the biomarkers [21–24]. Some studies have empirically demonstrated that the resistance to biodegradation of n-alkanes, isoprenoids, steranes, pentacyclic triterpenoids, tricyclic diterpenes, diasteranes, 25-norhopane, 25, 30-bisnorhopane, tetracyclic diterpenes, 22,29,30-trisnorhopane, and gammacerane increases gradually [20]. Oil degradation rank has been divided into 10 ranks by Wenger (2002) according to the composition of biomarkers [19]. In this study, the degradation ranks of six oils were determined based on Wenger’s degradation standard.The overall composition of the crude oil, such as the composition of n-alkanes and the relative content of steranes and terpanes, can be characterized by GC analysis. The GC chromatographs of six oils are shown in Figure2. The n-alkanes of oil B330 were hardly degraded, which indicates that oil B330 is normal oil. N-alkanes and isoprenoids of oil B276 to oil G574 were degraded gradually. Steranes and terpanes in oil L3917 began to be degraded and were seriously degraded in oil G574. The “baseline hump” (UCMs) enlarges gradually from oil B330 to oil G574 (Figure 2). These features indicate that the degradation rank of oils B330 to G574 increases gradually, oil B330 is normal oil, and the degradation ranks of oils B276 and YJ3624 are ranks 2 and 3.Figure 2
GC chromatograms of oil B330 to oil G574.In order to determine the degradation ranks of oils Y50714 to G574, the profiles of steranes and terpanes need to be further compared. The degradation rank of oil YJ3624 is rank 3 with steranes and terpanes not being degraded. The relative content of diasteranes, low molecular weight steranes, and tricyclic terpanes in oil YJ3624 is low, and it is the same with that of normal oil B330. Similar composition of oil Y50714 and oil YJ3624 indicates that neither steranes nor terpanes in oil YJ3624 have been degraded. Steranes and terpanes in oil L3917 began to be degraded, and the relative content of diasteranes, low molecular weight steranes, and tricyclic terpanes is higher than that in oil YJ3624 and oil Y50714. Only some steranes and terpanes resistant to degradation, such as low molecular weight steranes, diasteranes, tricyclic terpanes, norhopanes, and gammacerane, were detected in oil G574, and the highest peaks ofM/Z: 217 andM/Z: 191 are C21-pregnane and gammacerane, respectively. The above features indicate that the degradation ranks of oil Y50714 to oil G574 are 5, 6, and 8.The above analysis shows that oil B330 is normal oil and oil B276 to oil G574 are biodegraded oil with degradation ranks of 2, 3, 5, 6, and 8. Oils B276 to G574 are all low mature oils and their source rock is the same (black mudstones inEh
3
2). So the original compositions of oil B276 to oil G574 are comparable. Therefore, this set of oils can be used for the study on the formation of UCMs in biodegraded oil.


### 4.3. Formation of UCMs

The UCMs (“baseline hump”) can be clearly observed in oil B276 to oil G574. UCMs are a typical complex system, and their compounds may be as many as 25,000 [7]. Due to the limitation of separation capacity, UCMs can be hardly separated by GC and GC/MS [25]. In order to analyze the generation and change of UCMs, GC × GC/TOFMS was used to characterize the geochemical composition of the biodegraded oils [26, 27]. The baseline separation and orthogonal separation of oil G574 were achieved by GC × GC/TOFMS analysis. Then the relative content, types, and polarity differences of compounds in different biodegraded oils were analyzed.


#### 4.3.1. Relative Content of Compound

The total ion chromatograms (TIC) of oil B330 to oil G574 are shown in Figure3, and the geochemical composition shows a significant difference. In order to describe this variation better, the overall composition of oil was divided into six zones (Figure 3).Figure 3
Main compounds of six oil samples in GC × GC/TOFMS TIC. 1: low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons; 2: light hydrocarbons; 3: n-alkanes and isoprenoids; 4: sesquiterpanes; 5 + 6: steranes and terpanes.During the degradation of oils (oil B330 to oil G574), compounds in Zone 3 were firstly consumed by microbes, and then their relative content decreased. The relative content of compounds in Zones 1 and 2 firstly increased and then reduced. Oil B276 had the highest relative content of compounds in Zones 1 and 2. The relative content of Zones 5 and 6 increased but the kind of compounds decreased. The relative content and the kind of compounds in Zone 4 all increased. GC/MS analysis indicated that the compounds in Zone 1 were low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons, and they were light hydrocarbons in Zone 2, n-alkanes and isoprenoids in Zone 3, sesquiterpenes in Zone 4, and steranes and terpanes in Zones 5 and 6, respectively. Additionally, peaks in GC × GC/TOFMS TIC of oil G574 have similar heights and colors. This demonstrates that the relative content of individual compounds in severely biodegraded oil (oil G574) is similar. In general, with the increase of degradation rank, the relative content of n-alkanes and isoprenoids decreased; light hydrocarbons and low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons increased first and then decreased; and some sesquiterpenes, steranes, and terpanes increased gradually, while the relative content of individual compounds in severely biodegraded oils tends to be similar.


#### 4.3.2. Compound Types

As shown in Figure3, the compound types of severely biodegraded oil are different from that of normal oil. A brief classification of compounds in normal oil was presented in Section 4.3.1. The six compound types exhibit the variation in the degradation of oil. Firstly, the disappearance of types 1, 2, and 3 is the most significant feature. It is clearly shown by the absence of peak in Zones 1, 2, and 3 of oil G574. Secondly, many compounds in types 5 and 6 were degraded in severely biodegraded oil G574, such as C
27
~
C
29-regular steranes, C30-hopane, and C
31
~
C
35-homohopanes. The number of compound types can be represented by distribution area of peaks in the GC × GC/TOFMS TIC. The distribution area reduces gradually from oil B330 to oil G574, and the distribution area of the latter is only a quarter of that of the former. All the characteristics indicate that the compound types of biodegraded oil reduce significantly when compared with that of normal oil.


#### 4.3.3. Compound Polarity

Theorthogonal separation of GC × GC/TOFMS is achieved by the association of a nonpolar column with a polar column [28]. In this study, the first column is a nonpolar column and the second is a polar column. Therefore, the difference of the second dimension retention time represents the polarity difference of the compound [29].Oil B330 has the “minimum” area in the second dimensional chromatographic plane because other compounds are covered by n-alkanes (Figure3 B330), while oil B276 is more representative. The distribution area of oil B276 exceeds half of the second dimensional plane. In contrast, the peak area of oil G574 is much smaller, with only one-fifth of the second dimensional plane. The above difference indicates that the compounds in biodegraded oil have minor polarity difference.In summary, compound types in biodegraded oils reduce significantly with the microbial degradation of n-alkanes, light hydrocarbons, isoprenoids, low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons, most steranes, and terpanes, residual compounds have minor difference in polarity, and the relative content of individual compounds tends to be similar. Thus the compounds of biodegraded oil are coeluted in the traditional GC analysis, resulting in the formation of the UCMs (“baseline hump”).


### 4.4. Identification of UCMs

GC × GC/TOFMS, liquid chromatography associated mass spectrometry, and other techniques have been applied to the study of UCMs in biodegraded oil and bitumen [6–9, 26, 28]. Mass spectra analysis showed that cyclic-alkanes may be an important component of UCMs. In this study, UCMs were further identified by the standard materials validation, structured chromatograms, and mass spectrums of target compounds.


#### 4.4.1. UCMs Classification of Oil G574

The UCMs in oil G574 were divided into six classes (I
~
VI
⁡) according to the retention time and the spectrum structure (Figure 4). Under the collision of electrons with 70 ev in EI source, most molecules form fragment ions and part of molecules capture an electron to form molecular ions. Fragment ions can be used to infer molecular structure and molecular ions can determine the relative molecular mass. So the initial identification of compounds can be achieved [30]. Mass analyses of fragment ions showed that the characteristic ions of Class I areM/Z: 152, 166, 180, 194, 208, 222, and so forth, and they areM/Z: 126, 85 for Class II,M/Z: 123 for Class III,M/Z: 217 for Class IV, andM/Z: 191 for Classes V and VI, respectively. The composition of different classes was identified by different methods in the next section.Figure 4
Classification of compounds in UCMs in severely biodegraded oil G574.


#### 4.4.2. Identification of UCMs Classes III to VI

In order to determine the composition of UCMs for ClassesIII
~
VI
⁡, characteristic ion chromatograms of GC/MS and GC × GC/TOFMS were compared (Figure 5). The comparison results indicated that Class III is of sesquiterpanes, Class IV is of pregnane, homopregnane, and diasteranes, Class V is of tricyclic terpanes, and Class VI is of norhopanes, gammacerane, and so forth. These compounds are common in normal oil and resistant to biodegradation, so they can remain in the severely biodegraded oil.Figure 5
Qualitative diagram of compounds in classes III to VI. Left: GC/MS analysis; right: GC × GC/TOFMS analysis; TT: tricyclic terpane; TeT: tetracyclic terpane; H: hopane; G: gammacerane; P: pregnane; HP: homopregnane; DS: diasterane; SeT: sesquiterpane; PD: pentamethyl-naphthane; D: drimane; HD: homodrimane.It should be pointed out that, for UCMs, Class III has bicyclic structure (sesquiterpanes), Class V has tricyclic structure (tricyclic terpanes), Class IV has tetracyclic structure (pregnane), and Class VI has pentacyclic structure (gammacerane). Cyclohexane is the basic framework of the cyclic structure. In addition to these compounds identified, a large number of small peaks appear within the range of UCMs for ClassesIII
~
VI
⁡. Structural features of the two-dimensional spectra indicate that these peaks are the isomers of bicyclic to pentacyclic alkanes, and they are the major composition of UCMs for Classes III
~
VI
⁡. UCMs of Classes III to VI are biomarkers, which are common in normal oils. So this part of UCMs is originated from the enrichment of hydrocarbons resistant to degradation in normal oils.


#### 4.4.3. Identification of UCMs Classes I and II

Characteristic ions of UCMs Class I areM/Z: 138, 152, 166, 180, 194, 208, and 222 with features of isomer. The characteristic ions of UCMs of Class II areM/Z: 126 and 85. The first dimensional retention time of Class II increases gradually and the second dimensional retention time remains unchanged, which indicates that the compounds in Class II are isomers, too. According to the mass spectrums of target compounds and structured chromatograms, compounds in Class II may be the long chain alkyl-cyclohexanes. In order to validate the identification, standard materials naphthane (cis-,trans-), dodecyl-cyclohexane, tetradecyl-cyclohexane, and heptadecyl-cyclohexane were used. The GC × GC/TOFMS TIC of the standard materials and oil G574 spiked with standards are shown in Figure 6.Figure 6
GC × GC/TOFMS TIC of standard materials and oil G574 spiked with standards. 1: naphthane (cis- andtrans-); 2: dodecyl-cyclohexane; 3: tetradecyl-cyclohexane; 4: heptadecyl-cyclohexane.Additionally, the zoom of different unique ions is shown in Figure7. It can be seen that naphthane (Standard 1) shows “roof-tile” effect with the compounds in Class II (Figure 7), which indicates that compounds in Class II are alkyl-naphthanes. The relative molecular mass of naphthane is 138 and the compounds with the characteristic ions ofM/Z: 152, 166, 180, 194, 208, and 222 are methyl-, dimethyl-, trimethyl-, tetramethyl-, pentamethyl-, and hexamethyl-naphthane, respectively. Dodecyl-cyclohexane, tetradecyl-cyclohexane, and heptadecyl-cyclohexane (standards 2, 3, and 4) have almost the same first dimensional retention time and unique ions (M/Z: 126 and 85) as the compounds in Class I (Figure 7). It indicates that the compounds in Class I are long chain alkyl-cyclohexane. The substituents of long chain alkyl-cyclohexane were determined as C
10
~
C
20 according to retention times of standard compounds 2, 3, and 4. In summary, Classes I and II were composed of alkyl-cyclohexanes, alkyl-naphthanes, and their isomers. The compounds in the two classes have complete series and are unusual in normal oil. Speculatively, UCMs classes I and II may come from the newly formed compounds during the microbial transformation of oil.Figure 7
Composition of UCMs (classes I and II) identified by standard materials. 1, 2, 3, and 4 represent the same standards with Figure6; ACH: alkyl-cyclohexane; N: naphthane; MN: methyl-naphthane; DMN: dimethyl-naphthane; TMN: trimethyl-naphthane; TeMN: tetramethyl-naphthane; PMN: pentamethyl-naphthane; HMN: hexamethyl-naphthane.Based on the above analysis, the following conclusions can be drawn. Firstly, complex UCMs can be divided into six classes (Figure4). UCMs are composed mainly of cyclic- to pentacyclic-alkanes, and cyclohexane is the basic framework of these cyclic alkanes. Secondly, the compounds in UCMs are alkyl-cyclohexanes, alkyl-naphthanes, sesquiterpenes, steranes, and terpanes that are resistant to degradation and their isomers. Thirdly, UCMs consist of both the existing hydrocarbons in crude oil and the newly formed compounds during the microbial transformation of oil.


## 4.1. Geochemical Characteristics

### 4.1.1. Source Rocks

The Eh3 Formation can be divided into the Eh
3
1 and the Eh
3
2. Literatures have shown that biodegraded oils from the Eh
3
2 sandstones in the northern slope came from the Eh
3
2 mudstones [14–16]. The biodegraded oils in this study all come from the Eh
3
2 sandstones, so their source rocks are the same, that is, the Eh
3
2 mudstone.


### 4.1.2. Maturity

Biomarker maturity indicators, such as sterane maturity index (C29
α
α
α20R/(S + R) and C29
α
β
β/(α
α
α + α
β
β)), are usually used to assess the maturity of oil [17–19]. Steranes and terpanes will not be depleted when the oil degradation rank is lower than 5 [19, 20]. Therefore, the sterane maturity index can be applied to calculating the maturity of oils (degradation rank lower than 5) from the northern slope of Biyang depression. The results show that the oils are low mature oils. In addition, the maturity of the Eh
3
2 source rocks was discussed by Dong et al., and the results suggested that the Ro of the Eh
3
2 is about 0.5% to 0.7% [13]. Through the above analyses we can conclude that biodegraded oils B276 to G574 are low mature oils with similar maturity.


### 4.1.3. Biomarker Features

The biomarkers of the oils in the northern slope were analyzed by GC/MS. Different parameters of oils (degradation rank lower than 5) are calculated (Table2). The relative content of C27-, C28-, and C29-regular steranes can indicate the original organic matter inputs of source rocks [20]. The dominance of C27-regular sterane indicates the input of aquatic organic matter, C29-regular sterane indicates the input of land-plant organic matter, and C28-regular sterane can reflect the organic matter from the algas [20]. The oils in the northern slope have a relative high content of C27- and C28-regular sterane (0.27~0.32 and 0.31~0.34), which suggests the dominant input of lacustrine organic matter. The composition of tricyclic terpanes is an effective organic matter input index [20]. The oils in the northern slope have a low ratio of C19/C23-tricyclic terpanes or C
19
~
C
22/C
23
~
C
26-tricyclic terpanes and a high ratio of C26-tricyclic terpane/C24-tetracyclic terpane. It also proves the dominance input of lacustrine organic matter. Furthermore, oleanane that represents land plants input was not detected in the oils. Therefore, the oils in the northern slope are typical lacustrine oils.Table 2
Main geochemical parameters of oils from the northern slope.
Oil sample
Y3515
Y50714
YJ3624
B276
G412
C27/C27~C29-steranes
0.32
0.32
0.30
0.27
0.31
C28/C27~C29-steranes
0.33
0.33
0.34
0.33
0.31
C19/C23-tricyclic terpanes
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.12
0.07
C19~C22/C23~C26-tricyclic terpanes
0.62
0.50
0.50
1.17
0.74
C26-tricyclic/C24-tetracyclic terpane
2.24
2.32
2.38
1.72
2.51
C21~C22-pregnanes/(steranes +  diasteranes)
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.03
C19~C29-tricyclic terpanes/M/Z:191
0.29
0.25
0.23
0.32
0.30
C19~C29-tricyclic terpanes/C30-hopane
1.30
1.12
0.97
1.49
1.33
C27~C29-diasteranes/steranes
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
Ts/(Ts + Tm)
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.14
C31~C35-homohopanes/C30-hopane
0.58
0.61
0.60
0.61
0.54In addition, biomarker features can reflect the oil maturity, such asT
s
/
(
T
s
+
T
m
), C
27
~
C
29-diasteranes/steranes, the content of low molecular weight steranes, tricyclic terpanes, and homohopanes [20]. The ratios of T
s
/
(
T
s
+
T
m
), C
31
~
C
35-homohopanes/C30-hopane, C
21
~
C
22-pregnanes/(steranes + diasteranes), C
19
~
C
29-tricyclic terpanes/M/Z: 191, C
19
~
C
29-tricyclic terpanes/C30-hopane, and C
27
~
C
29-diasteranes/steranes are 0.10~0.15, 0.54~0.61, 0.01~0.03, 0.23~0.32, 0.97~1.49, and 0.05~0.06, respectively. All the ratios are relatively low. This also suggests that the oils in the northern slope are low mature oils.


## 4.1.1. Source Rocks

The Eh3 Formation can be divided into the Eh
3
1 and the Eh
3
2. Literatures have shown that biodegraded oils from the Eh
3
2 sandstones in the northern slope came from the Eh
3
2 mudstones [14–16]. The biodegraded oils in this study all come from the Eh
3
2 sandstones, so their source rocks are the same, that is, the Eh
3
2 mudstone.


## 4.1.2. Maturity

Biomarker maturity indicators, such as sterane maturity index (C29
α
α
α20R/(S + R) and C29
α
β
β/(α
α
α + α
β
β)), are usually used to assess the maturity of oil [17–19]. Steranes and terpanes will not be depleted when the oil degradation rank is lower than 5 [19, 20]. Therefore, the sterane maturity index can be applied to calculating the maturity of oils (degradation rank lower than 5) from the northern slope of Biyang depression. The results show that the oils are low mature oils. In addition, the maturity of the Eh
3
2 source rocks was discussed by Dong et al., and the results suggested that the Ro of the Eh
3
2 is about 0.5% to 0.7% [13]. Through the above analyses we can conclude that biodegraded oils B276 to G574 are low mature oils with similar maturity.


## 4.1.3. Biomarker Features

The biomarkers of the oils in the northern slope were analyzed by GC/MS. Different parameters of oils (degradation rank lower than 5) are calculated (Table2). The relative content of C27-, C28-, and C29-regular steranes can indicate the original organic matter inputs of source rocks [20]. The dominance of C27-regular sterane indicates the input of aquatic organic matter, C29-regular sterane indicates the input of land-plant organic matter, and C28-regular sterane can reflect the organic matter from the algas [20]. The oils in the northern slope have a relative high content of C27- and C28-regular sterane (0.27~0.32 and 0.31~0.34), which suggests the dominant input of lacustrine organic matter. The composition of tricyclic terpanes is an effective organic matter input index [20]. The oils in the northern slope have a low ratio of C19/C23-tricyclic terpanes or C
19
~
C
22/C
23
~
C
26-tricyclic terpanes and a high ratio of C26-tricyclic terpane/C24-tetracyclic terpane. It also proves the dominance input of lacustrine organic matter. Furthermore, oleanane that represents land plants input was not detected in the oils. Therefore, the oils in the northern slope are typical lacustrine oils.Table 2
Main geochemical parameters of oils from the northern slope.
Oil sample
Y3515
Y50714
YJ3624
B276
G412
C27/C27~C29-steranes
0.32
0.32
0.30
0.27
0.31
C28/C27~C29-steranes
0.33
0.33
0.34
0.33
0.31
C19/C23-tricyclic terpanes
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.12
0.07
C19~C22/C23~C26-tricyclic terpanes
0.62
0.50
0.50
1.17
0.74
C26-tricyclic/C24-tetracyclic terpane
2.24
2.32
2.38
1.72
2.51
C21~C22-pregnanes/(steranes +  diasteranes)
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.03
C19~C29-tricyclic terpanes/M/Z:191
0.29
0.25
0.23
0.32
0.30
C19~C29-tricyclic terpanes/C30-hopane
1.30
1.12
0.97
1.49
1.33
C27~C29-diasteranes/steranes
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
Ts/(Ts + Tm)
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.14
C31~C35-homohopanes/C30-hopane
0.58
0.61
0.60
0.61
0.54In addition, biomarker features can reflect the oil maturity, such asT
s
/
(
T
s
+
T
m
), C
27
~
C
29-diasteranes/steranes, the content of low molecular weight steranes, tricyclic terpanes, and homohopanes [20]. The ratios of T
s
/
(
T
s
+
T
m
), C
31
~
C
35-homohopanes/C30-hopane, C
21
~
C
22-pregnanes/(steranes + diasteranes), C
19
~
C
29-tricyclic terpanes/M/Z: 191, C
19
~
C
29-tricyclic terpanes/C30-hopane, and C
27
~
C
29-diasteranes/steranes are 0.10~0.15, 0.54~0.61, 0.01~0.03, 0.23~0.32, 0.97~1.49, and 0.05~0.06, respectively. All the ratios are relatively low. This also suggests that the oils in the northern slope are low mature oils.


## 4.2. Degradation Rank

Compounds in crude oil have different kinds of capability resisting the biodegradation, especially the biomarkers [21–24]. Some studies have empirically demonstrated that the resistance to biodegradation of n-alkanes, isoprenoids, steranes, pentacyclic triterpenoids, tricyclic diterpenes, diasteranes, 25-norhopane, 25, 30-bisnorhopane, tetracyclic diterpenes, 22,29,30-trisnorhopane, and gammacerane increases gradually [20]. Oil degradation rank has been divided into 10 ranks by Wenger (2002) according to the composition of biomarkers [19]. In this study, the degradation ranks of six oils were determined based on Wenger’s degradation standard.The overall composition of the crude oil, such as the composition of n-alkanes and the relative content of steranes and terpanes, can be characterized by GC analysis. The GC chromatographs of six oils are shown in Figure2. The n-alkanes of oil B330 were hardly degraded, which indicates that oil B330 is normal oil. N-alkanes and isoprenoids of oil B276 to oil G574 were degraded gradually. Steranes and terpanes in oil L3917 began to be degraded and were seriously degraded in oil G574. The “baseline hump” (UCMs) enlarges gradually from oil B330 to oil G574 (Figure 2). These features indicate that the degradation rank of oils B330 to G574 increases gradually, oil B330 is normal oil, and the degradation ranks of oils B276 and YJ3624 are ranks 2 and 3.Figure 2
GC chromatograms of oil B330 to oil G574.In order to determine the degradation ranks of oils Y50714 to G574, the profiles of steranes and terpanes need to be further compared. The degradation rank of oil YJ3624 is rank 3 with steranes and terpanes not being degraded. The relative content of diasteranes, low molecular weight steranes, and tricyclic terpanes in oil YJ3624 is low, and it is the same with that of normal oil B330. Similar composition of oil Y50714 and oil YJ3624 indicates that neither steranes nor terpanes in oil YJ3624 have been degraded. Steranes and terpanes in oil L3917 began to be degraded, and the relative content of diasteranes, low molecular weight steranes, and tricyclic terpanes is higher than that in oil YJ3624 and oil Y50714. Only some steranes and terpanes resistant to degradation, such as low molecular weight steranes, diasteranes, tricyclic terpanes, norhopanes, and gammacerane, were detected in oil G574, and the highest peaks ofM/Z: 217 andM/Z: 191 are C21-pregnane and gammacerane, respectively. The above features indicate that the degradation ranks of oil Y50714 to oil G574 are 5, 6, and 8.The above analysis shows that oil B330 is normal oil and oil B276 to oil G574 are biodegraded oil with degradation ranks of 2, 3, 5, 6, and 8. Oils B276 to G574 are all low mature oils and their source rock is the same (black mudstones inEh
3
2). So the original compositions of oil B276 to oil G574 are comparable. Therefore, this set of oils can be used for the study on the formation of UCMs in biodegraded oil.


## 4.3. Formation of UCMs

The UCMs (“baseline hump”) can be clearly observed in oil B276 to oil G574. UCMs are a typical complex system, and their compounds may be as many as 25,000 [7]. Due to the limitation of separation capacity, UCMs can be hardly separated by GC and GC/MS [25]. In order to analyze the generation and change of UCMs, GC × GC/TOFMS was used to characterize the geochemical composition of the biodegraded oils [26, 27]. The baseline separation and orthogonal separation of oil G574 were achieved by GC × GC/TOFMS analysis. Then the relative content, types, and polarity differences of compounds in different biodegraded oils were analyzed.


### 4.3.1. Relative Content of Compound

The total ion chromatograms (TIC) of oil B330 to oil G574 are shown in Figure3, and the geochemical composition shows a significant difference. In order to describe this variation better, the overall composition of oil was divided into six zones (Figure 3).Figure 3
Main compounds of six oil samples in GC × GC/TOFMS TIC. 1: low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons; 2: light hydrocarbons; 3: n-alkanes and isoprenoids; 4: sesquiterpanes; 5 + 6: steranes and terpanes.During the degradation of oils (oil B330 to oil G574), compounds in Zone 3 were firstly consumed by microbes, and then their relative content decreased. The relative content of compounds in Zones 1 and 2 firstly increased and then reduced. Oil B276 had the highest relative content of compounds in Zones 1 and 2. The relative content of Zones 5 and 6 increased but the kind of compounds decreased. The relative content and the kind of compounds in Zone 4 all increased. GC/MS analysis indicated that the compounds in Zone 1 were low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons, and they were light hydrocarbons in Zone 2, n-alkanes and isoprenoids in Zone 3, sesquiterpenes in Zone 4, and steranes and terpanes in Zones 5 and 6, respectively. Additionally, peaks in GC × GC/TOFMS TIC of oil G574 have similar heights and colors. This demonstrates that the relative content of individual compounds in severely biodegraded oil (oil G574) is similar. In general, with the increase of degradation rank, the relative content of n-alkanes and isoprenoids decreased; light hydrocarbons and low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons increased first and then decreased; and some sesquiterpenes, steranes, and terpanes increased gradually, while the relative content of individual compounds in severely biodegraded oils tends to be similar.


### 4.3.2. Compound Types

As shown in Figure3, the compound types of severely biodegraded oil are different from that of normal oil. A brief classification of compounds in normal oil was presented in Section 4.3.1. The six compound types exhibit the variation in the degradation of oil. Firstly, the disappearance of types 1, 2, and 3 is the most significant feature. It is clearly shown by the absence of peak in Zones 1, 2, and 3 of oil G574. Secondly, many compounds in types 5 and 6 were degraded in severely biodegraded oil G574, such as C
27
~
C
29-regular steranes, C30-hopane, and C
31
~
C
35-homohopanes. The number of compound types can be represented by distribution area of peaks in the GC × GC/TOFMS TIC. The distribution area reduces gradually from oil B330 to oil G574, and the distribution area of the latter is only a quarter of that of the former. All the characteristics indicate that the compound types of biodegraded oil reduce significantly when compared with that of normal oil.


### 4.3.3. Compound Polarity

Theorthogonal separation of GC × GC/TOFMS is achieved by the association of a nonpolar column with a polar column [28]. In this study, the first column is a nonpolar column and the second is a polar column. Therefore, the difference of the second dimension retention time represents the polarity difference of the compound [29].Oil B330 has the “minimum” area in the second dimensional chromatographic plane because other compounds are covered by n-alkanes (Figure3 B330), while oil B276 is more representative. The distribution area of oil B276 exceeds half of the second dimensional plane. In contrast, the peak area of oil G574 is much smaller, with only one-fifth of the second dimensional plane. The above difference indicates that the compounds in biodegraded oil have minor polarity difference.In summary, compound types in biodegraded oils reduce significantly with the microbial degradation of n-alkanes, light hydrocarbons, isoprenoids, low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons, most steranes, and terpanes, residual compounds have minor difference in polarity, and the relative content of individual compounds tends to be similar. Thus the compounds of biodegraded oil are coeluted in the traditional GC analysis, resulting in the formation of the UCMs (“baseline hump”).


## 4.3.1. Relative Content of Compound

The total ion chromatograms (TIC) of oil B330 to oil G574 are shown in Figure3, and the geochemical composition shows a significant difference. In order to describe this variation better, the overall composition of oil was divided into six zones (Figure 3).Figure 3
Main compounds of six oil samples in GC × GC/TOFMS TIC. 1: low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons; 2: light hydrocarbons; 3: n-alkanes and isoprenoids; 4: sesquiterpanes; 5 + 6: steranes and terpanes.During the degradation of oils (oil B330 to oil G574), compounds in Zone 3 were firstly consumed by microbes, and then their relative content decreased. The relative content of compounds in Zones 1 and 2 firstly increased and then reduced. Oil B276 had the highest relative content of compounds in Zones 1 and 2. The relative content of Zones 5 and 6 increased but the kind of compounds decreased. The relative content and the kind of compounds in Zone 4 all increased. GC/MS analysis indicated that the compounds in Zone 1 were low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons, and they were light hydrocarbons in Zone 2, n-alkanes and isoprenoids in Zone 3, sesquiterpenes in Zone 4, and steranes and terpanes in Zones 5 and 6, respectively. Additionally, peaks in GC × GC/TOFMS TIC of oil G574 have similar heights and colors. This demonstrates that the relative content of individual compounds in severely biodegraded oil (oil G574) is similar. In general, with the increase of degradation rank, the relative content of n-alkanes and isoprenoids decreased; light hydrocarbons and low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons increased first and then decreased; and some sesquiterpenes, steranes, and terpanes increased gradually, while the relative content of individual compounds in severely biodegraded oils tends to be similar.


## 4.3.2. Compound Types

As shown in Figure3, the compound types of severely biodegraded oil are different from that of normal oil. A brief classification of compounds in normal oil was presented in Section 4.3.1. The six compound types exhibit the variation in the degradation of oil. Firstly, the disappearance of types 1, 2, and 3 is the most significant feature. It is clearly shown by the absence of peak in Zones 1, 2, and 3 of oil G574. Secondly, many compounds in types 5 and 6 were degraded in severely biodegraded oil G574, such as C
27
~
C
29-regular steranes, C30-hopane, and C
31
~
C
35-homohopanes. The number of compound types can be represented by distribution area of peaks in the GC × GC/TOFMS TIC. The distribution area reduces gradually from oil B330 to oil G574, and the distribution area of the latter is only a quarter of that of the former. All the characteristics indicate that the compound types of biodegraded oil reduce significantly when compared with that of normal oil.


## 4.3.3. Compound Polarity

Theorthogonal separation of GC × GC/TOFMS is achieved by the association of a nonpolar column with a polar column [28]. In this study, the first column is a nonpolar column and the second is a polar column. Therefore, the difference of the second dimension retention time represents the polarity difference of the compound [29].Oil B330 has the “minimum” area in the second dimensional chromatographic plane because other compounds are covered by n-alkanes (Figure3 B330), while oil B276 is more representative. The distribution area of oil B276 exceeds half of the second dimensional plane. In contrast, the peak area of oil G574 is much smaller, with only one-fifth of the second dimensional plane. The above difference indicates that the compounds in biodegraded oil have minor polarity difference.In summary, compound types in biodegraded oils reduce significantly with the microbial degradation of n-alkanes, light hydrocarbons, isoprenoids, low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons, most steranes, and terpanes, residual compounds have minor difference in polarity, and the relative content of individual compounds tends to be similar. Thus the compounds of biodegraded oil are coeluted in the traditional GC analysis, resulting in the formation of the UCMs (“baseline hump”).


## 4.4. Identification of UCMs

GC × GC/TOFMS, liquid chromatography associated mass spectrometry, and other techniques have been applied to the study of UCMs in biodegraded oil and bitumen [6–9, 26, 28]. Mass spectra analysis showed that cyclic-alkanes may be an important component of UCMs. In this study, UCMs were further identified by the standard materials validation, structured chromatograms, and mass spectrums of target compounds.


### 4.4.1. UCMs Classification of Oil G574

The UCMs in oil G574 were divided into six classes (I
~
VI
⁡) according to the retention time and the spectrum structure (Figure 4). Under the collision of electrons with 70 ev in EI source, most molecules form fragment ions and part of molecules capture an electron to form molecular ions. Fragment ions can be used to infer molecular structure and molecular ions can determine the relative molecular mass. So the initial identification of compounds can be achieved [30]. Mass analyses of fragment ions showed that the characteristic ions of Class I areM/Z: 152, 166, 180, 194, 208, 222, and so forth, and they areM/Z: 126, 85 for Class II,M/Z: 123 for Class III,M/Z: 217 for Class IV, andM/Z: 191 for Classes V and VI, respectively. The composition of different classes was identified by different methods in the next section.Figure 4
Classification of compounds in UCMs in severely biodegraded oil G574.


### 4.4.2. Identification of UCMs Classes III to VI

In order to determine the composition of UCMs for ClassesIII
~
VI
⁡, characteristic ion chromatograms of GC/MS and GC × GC/TOFMS were compared (Figure 5). The comparison results indicated that Class III is of sesquiterpanes, Class IV is of pregnane, homopregnane, and diasteranes, Class V is of tricyclic terpanes, and Class VI is of norhopanes, gammacerane, and so forth. These compounds are common in normal oil and resistant to biodegradation, so they can remain in the severely biodegraded oil.Figure 5
Qualitative diagram of compounds in classes III to VI. Left: GC/MS analysis; right: GC × GC/TOFMS analysis; TT: tricyclic terpane; TeT: tetracyclic terpane; H: hopane; G: gammacerane; P: pregnane; HP: homopregnane; DS: diasterane; SeT: sesquiterpane; PD: pentamethyl-naphthane; D: drimane; HD: homodrimane.It should be pointed out that, for UCMs, Class III has bicyclic structure (sesquiterpanes), Class V has tricyclic structure (tricyclic terpanes), Class IV has tetracyclic structure (pregnane), and Class VI has pentacyclic structure (gammacerane). Cyclohexane is the basic framework of the cyclic structure. In addition to these compounds identified, a large number of small peaks appear within the range of UCMs for ClassesIII
~
VI
⁡. Structural features of the two-dimensional spectra indicate that these peaks are the isomers of bicyclic to pentacyclic alkanes, and they are the major composition of UCMs for Classes III
~
VI
⁡. UCMs of Classes III to VI are biomarkers, which are common in normal oils. So this part of UCMs is originated from the enrichment of hydrocarbons resistant to degradation in normal oils.


### 4.4.3. Identification of UCMs Classes I and II

Characteristic ions of UCMs Class I areM/Z: 138, 152, 166, 180, 194, 208, and 222 with features of isomer. The characteristic ions of UCMs of Class II areM/Z: 126 and 85. The first dimensional retention time of Class II increases gradually and the second dimensional retention time remains unchanged, which indicates that the compounds in Class II are isomers, too. According to the mass spectrums of target compounds and structured chromatograms, compounds in Class II may be the long chain alkyl-cyclohexanes. In order to validate the identification, standard materials naphthane (cis-,trans-), dodecyl-cyclohexane, tetradecyl-cyclohexane, and heptadecyl-cyclohexane were used. The GC × GC/TOFMS TIC of the standard materials and oil G574 spiked with standards are shown in Figure 6.Figure 6
GC × GC/TOFMS TIC of standard materials and oil G574 spiked with standards. 1: naphthane (cis- andtrans-); 2: dodecyl-cyclohexane; 3: tetradecyl-cyclohexane; 4: heptadecyl-cyclohexane.Additionally, the zoom of different unique ions is shown in Figure7. It can be seen that naphthane (Standard 1) shows “roof-tile” effect with the compounds in Class II (Figure 7), which indicates that compounds in Class II are alkyl-naphthanes. The relative molecular mass of naphthane is 138 and the compounds with the characteristic ions ofM/Z: 152, 166, 180, 194, 208, and 222 are methyl-, dimethyl-, trimethyl-, tetramethyl-, pentamethyl-, and hexamethyl-naphthane, respectively. Dodecyl-cyclohexane, tetradecyl-cyclohexane, and heptadecyl-cyclohexane (standards 2, 3, and 4) have almost the same first dimensional retention time and unique ions (M/Z: 126 and 85) as the compounds in Class I (Figure 7). It indicates that the compounds in Class I are long chain alkyl-cyclohexane. The substituents of long chain alkyl-cyclohexane were determined as C
10
~
C
20 according to retention times of standard compounds 2, 3, and 4. In summary, Classes I and II were composed of alkyl-cyclohexanes, alkyl-naphthanes, and their isomers. The compounds in the two classes have complete series and are unusual in normal oil. Speculatively, UCMs classes I and II may come from the newly formed compounds during the microbial transformation of oil.Figure 7
Composition of UCMs (classes I and II) identified by standard materials. 1, 2, 3, and 4 represent the same standards with Figure6; ACH: alkyl-cyclohexane; N: naphthane; MN: methyl-naphthane; DMN: dimethyl-naphthane; TMN: trimethyl-naphthane; TeMN: tetramethyl-naphthane; PMN: pentamethyl-naphthane; HMN: hexamethyl-naphthane.Based on the above analysis, the following conclusions can be drawn. Firstly, complex UCMs can be divided into six classes (Figure4). UCMs are composed mainly of cyclic- to pentacyclic-alkanes, and cyclohexane is the basic framework of these cyclic alkanes. Secondly, the compounds in UCMs are alkyl-cyclohexanes, alkyl-naphthanes, sesquiterpenes, steranes, and terpanes that are resistant to degradation and their isomers. Thirdly, UCMs consist of both the existing hydrocarbons in crude oil and the newly formed compounds during the microbial transformation of oil.


## 4.4.1. UCMs Classification of Oil G574

The UCMs in oil G574 were divided into six classes (I
~
VI
⁡) according to the retention time and the spectrum structure (Figure 4). Under the collision of electrons with 70 ev in EI source, most molecules form fragment ions and part of molecules capture an electron to form molecular ions. Fragment ions can be used to infer molecular structure and molecular ions can determine the relative molecular mass. So the initial identification of compounds can be achieved [30]. Mass analyses of fragment ions showed that the characteristic ions of Class I areM/Z: 152, 166, 180, 194, 208, 222, and so forth, and they areM/Z: 126, 85 for Class II,M/Z: 123 for Class III,M/Z: 217 for Class IV, andM/Z: 191 for Classes V and VI, respectively. The composition of different classes was identified by different methods in the next section.Figure 4
Classification of compounds in UCMs in severely biodegraded oil G574.


## 4.4.2. Identification of UCMs Classes III to VI

In order to determine the composition of UCMs for ClassesIII
~
VI
⁡, characteristic ion chromatograms of GC/MS and GC × GC/TOFMS were compared (Figure 5). The comparison results indicated that Class III is of sesquiterpanes, Class IV is of pregnane, homopregnane, and diasteranes, Class V is of tricyclic terpanes, and Class VI is of norhopanes, gammacerane, and so forth. These compounds are common in normal oil and resistant to biodegradation, so they can remain in the severely biodegraded oil.Figure 5
Qualitative diagram of compounds in classes III to VI. Left: GC/MS analysis; right: GC × GC/TOFMS analysis; TT: tricyclic terpane; TeT: tetracyclic terpane; H: hopane; G: gammacerane; P: pregnane; HP: homopregnane; DS: diasterane; SeT: sesquiterpane; PD: pentamethyl-naphthane; D: drimane; HD: homodrimane.It should be pointed out that, for UCMs, Class III has bicyclic structure (sesquiterpanes), Class V has tricyclic structure (tricyclic terpanes), Class IV has tetracyclic structure (pregnane), and Class VI has pentacyclic structure (gammacerane). Cyclohexane is the basic framework of the cyclic structure. In addition to these compounds identified, a large number of small peaks appear within the range of UCMs for ClassesIII
~
VI
⁡. Structural features of the two-dimensional spectra indicate that these peaks are the isomers of bicyclic to pentacyclic alkanes, and they are the major composition of UCMs for Classes III
~
VI
⁡. UCMs of Classes III to VI are biomarkers, which are common in normal oils. So this part of UCMs is originated from the enrichment of hydrocarbons resistant to degradation in normal oils.


## 4.4.3. Identification of UCMs Classes I and II

Characteristic ions of UCMs Class I areM/Z: 138, 152, 166, 180, 194, 208, and 222 with features of isomer. The characteristic ions of UCMs of Class II areM/Z: 126 and 85. The first dimensional retention time of Class II increases gradually and the second dimensional retention time remains unchanged, which indicates that the compounds in Class II are isomers, too. According to the mass spectrums of target compounds and structured chromatograms, compounds in Class II may be the long chain alkyl-cyclohexanes. In order to validate the identification, standard materials naphthane (cis-,trans-), dodecyl-cyclohexane, tetradecyl-cyclohexane, and heptadecyl-cyclohexane were used. The GC × GC/TOFMS TIC of the standard materials and oil G574 spiked with standards are shown in Figure 6.Figure 6
GC × GC/TOFMS TIC of standard materials and oil G574 spiked with standards. 1: naphthane (cis- andtrans-); 2: dodecyl-cyclohexane; 3: tetradecyl-cyclohexane; 4: heptadecyl-cyclohexane.Additionally, the zoom of different unique ions is shown in Figure7. It can be seen that naphthane (Standard 1) shows “roof-tile” effect with the compounds in Class II (Figure 7), which indicates that compounds in Class II are alkyl-naphthanes. The relative molecular mass of naphthane is 138 and the compounds with the characteristic ions ofM/Z: 152, 166, 180, 194, 208, and 222 are methyl-, dimethyl-, trimethyl-, tetramethyl-, pentamethyl-, and hexamethyl-naphthane, respectively. Dodecyl-cyclohexane, tetradecyl-cyclohexane, and heptadecyl-cyclohexane (standards 2, 3, and 4) have almost the same first dimensional retention time and unique ions (M/Z: 126 and 85) as the compounds in Class I (Figure 7). It indicates that the compounds in Class I are long chain alkyl-cyclohexane. The substituents of long chain alkyl-cyclohexane were determined as C
10
~
C
20 according to retention times of standard compounds 2, 3, and 4. In summary, Classes I and II were composed of alkyl-cyclohexanes, alkyl-naphthanes, and their isomers. The compounds in the two classes have complete series and are unusual in normal oil. Speculatively, UCMs classes I and II may come from the newly formed compounds during the microbial transformation of oil.Figure 7
Composition of UCMs (classes I and II) identified by standard materials. 1, 2, 3, and 4 represent the same standards with Figure6; ACH: alkyl-cyclohexane; N: naphthane; MN: methyl-naphthane; DMN: dimethyl-naphthane; TMN: trimethyl-naphthane; TeMN: tetramethyl-naphthane; PMN: pentamethyl-naphthane; HMN: hexamethyl-naphthane.Based on the above analysis, the following conclusions can be drawn. Firstly, complex UCMs can be divided into six classes (Figure4). UCMs are composed mainly of cyclic- to pentacyclic-alkanes, and cyclohexane is the basic framework of these cyclic alkanes. Secondly, the compounds in UCMs are alkyl-cyclohexanes, alkyl-naphthanes, sesquiterpenes, steranes, and terpanes that are resistant to degradation and their isomers. Thirdly, UCMs consist of both the existing hydrocarbons in crude oil and the newly formed compounds during the microbial transformation of oil.


## 5. Conclusions

Biodegraded oils B276 to G574 are typical lacustrine oils. The source rocks of the oils are the black mudstones in theEh
3
2 of Biyang depression, and they are all low mature oils. The original compositions of this set of oils are comparable. The degradation ranks of oil B276 to oil G574 increase gradually.With the degradation degree increasing (oil B330 to oil G574), n-alkanes, light hydrocarbons, isoprenoids, low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons, steranes, and terpanes are degraded in the relative order by microorganisms. The compound types of biodegraded oil reduce significantly, the compounds in different types have minor difference of polarity, and the relative content of individual compounds is similar. These changes result in the coelution of biodegraded oil in traditional GC analysis and form the raised “baseline hump” named as UCMs.Standard compounds and mass spectrums analyses showed that cyclic alkanes with one to five rings (cyclohexane as basic framework) are major components of UCMs. UCMs can be divided into six classes (I
~
VI
⁡). Classes I and II were composed of alkyl-cyclohexanes, alkyl-naphthanes, and their isomers. Classes III
~
VI
⁡ were composed of sesquiterpenoids, tricyclic terpanes, low molecular weight steranes, diasteranes, norhopanes, and their isomers. Different classes of UCMs may have different sources. The former (I and II) are originated from the enrichment of hydrocarbons resistant to degradation in the oil and the latter (III
~
VI
⁡) may come from the newly formed compounds during the microbial transformation of oil.



---

*Source: 102576-2014-08-10.xml*