# Studies on a Foam System of Ultralow Interfacial Tension Applied in Daqing Oilfield after Polymer Flooding

Authors: Hong-sheng Liu; Jing-qin Wang; Li Yang; Dong-yang Jiang; Chang-sen Lv; Chang-yu Cui; Si-yuan Gao
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

In order to study the effects of oil displacement by a foam system of ultralow interfacial tension, the interfacial activities and foam properties of a nonionic gemini surfactant (DWS) were investigated under Daqing Oilfield reservoir conditions. Injection methods and alternate cycle of the foam system were discussed here on the basis of results from core flow experiments. It was obtained that the surface tension of DWS was approximately 25 mN/m, and ultralow interfacial tension was reached between oil and DWS with a surfactant concentration between 0.05wt% and 0.4wt%. The binary system showed splendid foam performances, and the preferential surfactant concentration was 0.3wt% with a polymer concentration of 0.2wt%. When gas and liquid were injected simultaneously, flow control capability of the foam reached its peak at the gas-liquid ratio of 3 : 1. Enhanced oil recovery factor of the binary foam system exceeded 10% in a parallel natural cores displacement after polymer flooding.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Polymer flooding has entered the stage of successive water flooding in the main layers of Daqing Oilfield. Compared with water flooding, polymer flooding could improve both sweeping volumes and oil displacing efficiencies, resulting in an enhanced recovery factor of 10%. However, 50% of the geological reserves still remained in the original reservoirs after polymer flooding [1, 2]. Conflicts in the interlayers and inherent layers were the most influential factors in the development of the main reserves of Daqing Oilfield. Therefore, new methods of enhanced oil recovery were of crucial significance [3].Foam technologies abroad have focused primarily on the flow control of gases, such as during carbon dioxide flooding and steam flooding [4, 5]. Some researches concerning foam technology have been conducted in Daqing and Shengli Oilfields, focusing primarily on flow control and enhanced recovery efficiency [6, 7]. Results of these studies indicated that foam was a viscoelastic fluid with a larger flow resistance than polymer. Therefore, foam flooding appeared to have great potential in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) [8].In order to research the feasibility of foam flooding after polymer flooding in Daqing Oilfield, interfacial activities, foam stability, foam flow properties, and oil displacement of a nonionic gemini surfactant were investigated under Daqing Oilfield reservoir conditions. Results from this research could provide important process parameters for drafting foam flooding schemes.


## 2. Materials and Methods

The oil and water were Daqing crude oil and oilfield sewage. Two different partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamides (HPAM), with the molecular weight of 16 and 25 million, were provided by the Daqing Refinery Company. The surfactant was a nonionic gemini surfactant (DWS). The man-made homogeneous cores were purchased from the Northeast Petroleum University. The natural cores were part of the major reservoirs of the Daqing Oilfield. The TX500C spinning drop interface tensiometer was purchased from Bowing Industry Company in America. The foam scanner was purchased from I.T. Concept in France. The foam displacement and flow control instruments were provided by the Jiangsu Huayan Petroleum Apparatus Company (Figure1).Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the foam displacement and flow control instruments.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Properties of Foam Agent

#### 3.1.1. Surface and Interfacial Tensions

Surface and interfacial tensions are not only important indicators of surfactant activity but also some of the most important parameters in chemical flooding. The surface and interfacial tensions of DWS were shown in Figure2. It was clear that surface tension of DWS decreased as its concentration increased. According to the curves, the critical micelle concentration of DWS was about 0.08wt%, and the surface tension of DWS then was approximately 25 mN/m, which was close to the theoretical minimum surface tension of hydrocarbon surfactants. In short, the surface activity of DWS was very good. The interfacial tensions of DWS in different concentrations were measured. Results indicated that an ultralow interfacial tension was reached between oil and DWS in the concentration range of 0.05wt% to 0.4wt%, which further implied the potential of enhancing oil displacement efficiency. Because DWS was a nonionic surfactant, inorganic salts had less influences on the surface and interfacial tensions of DWS.Figure 2
Surface and interfacial tensions of DWS.


#### 3.1.2. Viscosity Properties

Viscosities of foam systems which are also one of the most influential parameters in chemical EOR. Viscosities of DWS in a polymer system were shown in Figure3. Molecular weight of the HPAM polymer was 25 million, and concentration of DWS was 0.3wt%. It was observed that viscosities of the binary system increased as the polymer concentration went up. Compared with the viscosities in deionized water, viscosities of the binary system reduced in brine.Figure 3
Viscosities of DWS in HPAM system.


#### 3.1.3. Foam Properties

Foam volumes and stability of a binary foam agent system were tested, and the results were shown in Figure4. When the molecular weight and concentration of the HPAM polymer were 25 million and 0.2wt%, foam volumes and stability of the binary system increased as the concentration of DWS was added. When the DWS concentration exceeded 0.2wt% in sewage, foam volumes of the binary system tended to become steady. The same happened in deionized water when the DWS concentration exceeded 0.3wt%.Foam volumes and stability of DWS in HPAM systems.
(a)
(b)When molecular weight of the HPAM polymer was 25 million and concentration of DWS was 0.3wt%, foam volumes of the binary system first increased as the polymer concentration rose, and then it decreased. Foam stability of the binary system increased with the polymer concentration and became steady when polymer concentration exceeded 0.2wt%. It was analyzed that the optimum foam agent system should have a DWS concentration of 0.3%, polymer molecular weight of 25 million, and polymer concentration of 0.2wt%. In inorganic salt solution, foam volumes of the binary system reduced, but foam stability of the binary system slightly increased.Foam quality of DWS in polymer system was shown in Figure5. When HPAM molecular weight was 25 million, foam quality of DWS in polymer system first increased as concentration of DWS or HPAM increased, and then it became steady when DWS concentration exceeded 0.4wt% or polymer concentration exceeded 0.2wt%. Trend of the foam quality of the binary system was consistent with that of the foam half-life. Foam quality of the binary system slightly decreased in inorganic salt solution.Figure 5
Foam quality of DWS in HPAM system.


#### 3.1.4. Adsorption Properties

The adsorption properties of DWS were studied, and results were shown in Table1. The interfacial tensions of DWS decreased after adsorption in cores at the concentration less than 0.3wt%. But when DWS concentration exceeded 0.3%, interfacial tensions of DWS increased after adsorption in cores. Foam volumes of DWS were not influenced by core adsorption. Meanwhile, foam half-life of DWS increased after adsorption in cores. Because DWS was a nonionic surfactant, its adsorption in cores was quite small [9]. Therefore, the interfacial tensions and foam properties of DWS decreased slightly after adsorption in cores. Some tiny matter suspended in the solution after adsorption in cores, which was helpful to improve foam stability [10].Table 1
Properties of DWS after adsorption in cores.
DWS concentration (%)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Surface tension (mN/m)
Original solution
0.0056
0.0045
0.0034
0.0084
0.0112
After adsorption
0.0078
0.0047
0.0035
0.0032
0.0053
Foam volume (mL)
Original solution
164
163
161
165
165
After adsorption
156
158
160
161
164
Foam stability (min)
Original solution
30.1
32.1
35.1
36.4
36.1
After adsorption
35.1
38.5
46.2
48.1
50.2


### 3.2. Properties of Foam Flow

#### 3.2.1. Effects of Gas-Liquid Ratio on Foam Flow Resistance

Control capability of foam flow was studied under different gas-liquid ratios, and results were shown in Figure6. In the research, a binary foam agent system was applied. Molecular weight and concentration of polymer HPAM were 25 million and 0.2wt%, and DWS concentration was 0.3wt%. Alternate period of the gas-liquid mixture was 0, and permeability of the man-made homogeneous cores was about 0.8 μm2.Figure 6
Effect of gas-liquid ratio on foam flow resistance.The resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam first increased as the gas-liquid ratio went up, but then they decreased. When the gas-liquid ratio was 3 : 1, control capability of the foam flow reached its peak. When the gas-liquid ratio was below 3 : 1, there was enough gas in the porous media as the gas-liquid ratio increased, which resulted in lots of foam and increased plug capacity of foam in cores. And the resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam increased. As the gas-liquid ratio continued to increase, gas content in porous media also increased. On the one hand, more foam was generated in the porous media, which helped to plug the large pores in the cores. On the other hand, the liquid film of the foam becomes thinner, decreasing the stability of the foam and causing it to break down more easily. A gas-liquid ratio of more than 3 : 1 was too large, making it difficult for the foam to be produced in the porous media and even resulting in gas channeling. The plug capacity of the foam decreased, causing the resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam to decline.


#### 3.2.2. Effects of the Gas-Liquid Alternate Period on Foam Flow Resistance

Gas-liquid alternate period of foam was researched, and results were shown in Figure7. In this investigation, a binary foam agent system was applied. Molecular weight and concentration of polymer HPAM were 25 million and 0.2wt%, and DWS concentration was 0.3wt%. The gas-liquid ratio was 3 : 1, and permeability of the man-made homogeneous cores was about 0.8 μm2.Figure 7
Effects of the gas-liquid alternate period on foam flow resistance.When the gas-liquid alternate period was 0, control capability of the foam flow reached its peak. The resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam were the largest. Resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam decreased as the gas-liquid alternate period increased. When alternate period increased, separate displacements of the gas and liquid become obvious in cores, which were unfavorable for bubble forming and reduced the foam flow resistance.


#### 3.2.3. Effects of Core Permeability on Foam Flow Resistance

Effects of core permeability on foam flow resistance were shown in Figure8. In this research, a binary foam agent system was applied. Molecular weight and concentration of polymer HPAM were 25 million and 0.2wt%, and DWS concentration was 0.3wt%. The gas-liquid ratio was 3 : 1, and alternate period was 0.Figure 8
Effects of core permeability on foam flow resistance.The resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam first increased as core permeability rose, but then it decreased. When the core permeability was about 1.2μm2, control capability of the foam flow reached its peak. Results indicated that there was a matching relationship between the mobility control of the foam system and the core permeability. Flooding controls in cores of different permeability should be improved by different foam systems.


### 3.3. Foam Flooding Results of a Parallel Natural Core

In order to further verify the displacing efficiency of foam flooding, experiments were conducted in a parallel core, and results were shown in Table2. In the experiments, the core was first flooded by HPAM with the molecular weight and concentration of 16 million and 0.1wt% and then flooded by a binary foam agent system. For the foam agent system, Molecular weight and concentration of polymer HPAM were 25 million and 0.2wt%, and DWS concentration was 0.3wt%. The gas-liquid ratio was 3 : 1, and alternate period was 0.Table 2
Foam flooding results of a parallel natural core.
Sort
Core number
Gas permeability (µm2)
Oil saturation(%)
Water flooding EOR (%)
HPAM flooding EOR (%)
Foam flooding EOR (%)
Total EOR (%)
1
L-20
0.886
69.3
50.6
9.6
9.6
69.8
L-23
0.316
67.2
46.3
7.8
11.8
65.9
Average
48.5
8.7
10.7
67.9
2
L-54
0.714
63.0
43.8
13.1
8.9
65.8
L-59
0.353
65.4
46.1
6.2
12.2
64.5
Average
45.0
9.6
10.5
65.1Enhanced recovery factor for the binary foam system exceeded 10%. Because the foam blocked the high-permeability pores effectively and enlarged sweeping volumes, it could move forward in cores homogeneously. Meanwhile, the remaining oil could be emulsified to form small oil droplets, which could enter the membrane of the foam liquid. Foam containing these oil droplets moved over a certain distance, and then the foam was broken to release the oil droplets. Subsequent foam repeated the process. It was found that the displacing efficiency of foam was better than that of polymer flooding.


## 3.1. Properties of Foam Agent

### 3.1.1. Surface and Interfacial Tensions

Surface and interfacial tensions are not only important indicators of surfactant activity but also some of the most important parameters in chemical flooding. The surface and interfacial tensions of DWS were shown in Figure2. It was clear that surface tension of DWS decreased as its concentration increased. According to the curves, the critical micelle concentration of DWS was about 0.08wt%, and the surface tension of DWS then was approximately 25 mN/m, which was close to the theoretical minimum surface tension of hydrocarbon surfactants. In short, the surface activity of DWS was very good. The interfacial tensions of DWS in different concentrations were measured. Results indicated that an ultralow interfacial tension was reached between oil and DWS in the concentration range of 0.05wt% to 0.4wt%, which further implied the potential of enhancing oil displacement efficiency. Because DWS was a nonionic surfactant, inorganic salts had less influences on the surface and interfacial tensions of DWS.Figure 2
Surface and interfacial tensions of DWS.


### 3.1.2. Viscosity Properties

Viscosities of foam systems which are also one of the most influential parameters in chemical EOR. Viscosities of DWS in a polymer system were shown in Figure3. Molecular weight of the HPAM polymer was 25 million, and concentration of DWS was 0.3wt%. It was observed that viscosities of the binary system increased as the polymer concentration went up. Compared with the viscosities in deionized water, viscosities of the binary system reduced in brine.Figure 3
Viscosities of DWS in HPAM system.


### 3.1.3. Foam Properties

Foam volumes and stability of a binary foam agent system were tested, and the results were shown in Figure4. When the molecular weight and concentration of the HPAM polymer were 25 million and 0.2wt%, foam volumes and stability of the binary system increased as the concentration of DWS was added. When the DWS concentration exceeded 0.2wt% in sewage, foam volumes of the binary system tended to become steady. The same happened in deionized water when the DWS concentration exceeded 0.3wt%.Foam volumes and stability of DWS in HPAM systems.
(a)
(b)When molecular weight of the HPAM polymer was 25 million and concentration of DWS was 0.3wt%, foam volumes of the binary system first increased as the polymer concentration rose, and then it decreased. Foam stability of the binary system increased with the polymer concentration and became steady when polymer concentration exceeded 0.2wt%. It was analyzed that the optimum foam agent system should have a DWS concentration of 0.3%, polymer molecular weight of 25 million, and polymer concentration of 0.2wt%. In inorganic salt solution, foam volumes of the binary system reduced, but foam stability of the binary system slightly increased.Foam quality of DWS in polymer system was shown in Figure5. When HPAM molecular weight was 25 million, foam quality of DWS in polymer system first increased as concentration of DWS or HPAM increased, and then it became steady when DWS concentration exceeded 0.4wt% or polymer concentration exceeded 0.2wt%. Trend of the foam quality of the binary system was consistent with that of the foam half-life. Foam quality of the binary system slightly decreased in inorganic salt solution.Figure 5
Foam quality of DWS in HPAM system.


### 3.1.4. Adsorption Properties

The adsorption properties of DWS were studied, and results were shown in Table1. The interfacial tensions of DWS decreased after adsorption in cores at the concentration less than 0.3wt%. But when DWS concentration exceeded 0.3%, interfacial tensions of DWS increased after adsorption in cores. Foam volumes of DWS were not influenced by core adsorption. Meanwhile, foam half-life of DWS increased after adsorption in cores. Because DWS was a nonionic surfactant, its adsorption in cores was quite small [9]. Therefore, the interfacial tensions and foam properties of DWS decreased slightly after adsorption in cores. Some tiny matter suspended in the solution after adsorption in cores, which was helpful to improve foam stability [10].Table 1
Properties of DWS after adsorption in cores.
DWS concentration (%)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Surface tension (mN/m)
Original solution
0.0056
0.0045
0.0034
0.0084
0.0112
After adsorption
0.0078
0.0047
0.0035
0.0032
0.0053
Foam volume (mL)
Original solution
164
163
161
165
165
After adsorption
156
158
160
161
164
Foam stability (min)
Original solution
30.1
32.1
35.1
36.4
36.1
After adsorption
35.1
38.5
46.2
48.1
50.2


## 3.1.1. Surface and Interfacial Tensions

Surface and interfacial tensions are not only important indicators of surfactant activity but also some of the most important parameters in chemical flooding. The surface and interfacial tensions of DWS were shown in Figure2. It was clear that surface tension of DWS decreased as its concentration increased. According to the curves, the critical micelle concentration of DWS was about 0.08wt%, and the surface tension of DWS then was approximately 25 mN/m, which was close to the theoretical minimum surface tension of hydrocarbon surfactants. In short, the surface activity of DWS was very good. The interfacial tensions of DWS in different concentrations were measured. Results indicated that an ultralow interfacial tension was reached between oil and DWS in the concentration range of 0.05wt% to 0.4wt%, which further implied the potential of enhancing oil displacement efficiency. Because DWS was a nonionic surfactant, inorganic salts had less influences on the surface and interfacial tensions of DWS.Figure 2
Surface and interfacial tensions of DWS.


## 3.1.2. Viscosity Properties

Viscosities of foam systems which are also one of the most influential parameters in chemical EOR. Viscosities of DWS in a polymer system were shown in Figure3. Molecular weight of the HPAM polymer was 25 million, and concentration of DWS was 0.3wt%. It was observed that viscosities of the binary system increased as the polymer concentration went up. Compared with the viscosities in deionized water, viscosities of the binary system reduced in brine.Figure 3
Viscosities of DWS in HPAM system.


## 3.1.3. Foam Properties

Foam volumes and stability of a binary foam agent system were tested, and the results were shown in Figure4. When the molecular weight and concentration of the HPAM polymer were 25 million and 0.2wt%, foam volumes and stability of the binary system increased as the concentration of DWS was added. When the DWS concentration exceeded 0.2wt% in sewage, foam volumes of the binary system tended to become steady. The same happened in deionized water when the DWS concentration exceeded 0.3wt%.Foam volumes and stability of DWS in HPAM systems.
(a)
(b)When molecular weight of the HPAM polymer was 25 million and concentration of DWS was 0.3wt%, foam volumes of the binary system first increased as the polymer concentration rose, and then it decreased. Foam stability of the binary system increased with the polymer concentration and became steady when polymer concentration exceeded 0.2wt%. It was analyzed that the optimum foam agent system should have a DWS concentration of 0.3%, polymer molecular weight of 25 million, and polymer concentration of 0.2wt%. In inorganic salt solution, foam volumes of the binary system reduced, but foam stability of the binary system slightly increased.Foam quality of DWS in polymer system was shown in Figure5. When HPAM molecular weight was 25 million, foam quality of DWS in polymer system first increased as concentration of DWS or HPAM increased, and then it became steady when DWS concentration exceeded 0.4wt% or polymer concentration exceeded 0.2wt%. Trend of the foam quality of the binary system was consistent with that of the foam half-life. Foam quality of the binary system slightly decreased in inorganic salt solution.Figure 5
Foam quality of DWS in HPAM system.


## 3.1.4. Adsorption Properties

The adsorption properties of DWS were studied, and results were shown in Table1. The interfacial tensions of DWS decreased after adsorption in cores at the concentration less than 0.3wt%. But when DWS concentration exceeded 0.3%, interfacial tensions of DWS increased after adsorption in cores. Foam volumes of DWS were not influenced by core adsorption. Meanwhile, foam half-life of DWS increased after adsorption in cores. Because DWS was a nonionic surfactant, its adsorption in cores was quite small [9]. Therefore, the interfacial tensions and foam properties of DWS decreased slightly after adsorption in cores. Some tiny matter suspended in the solution after adsorption in cores, which was helpful to improve foam stability [10].Table 1
Properties of DWS after adsorption in cores.
DWS concentration (%)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Surface tension (mN/m)
Original solution
0.0056
0.0045
0.0034
0.0084
0.0112
After adsorption
0.0078
0.0047
0.0035
0.0032
0.0053
Foam volume (mL)
Original solution
164
163
161
165
165
After adsorption
156
158
160
161
164
Foam stability (min)
Original solution
30.1
32.1
35.1
36.4
36.1
After adsorption
35.1
38.5
46.2
48.1
50.2


## 3.2. Properties of Foam Flow

### 3.2.1. Effects of Gas-Liquid Ratio on Foam Flow Resistance

Control capability of foam flow was studied under different gas-liquid ratios, and results were shown in Figure6. In the research, a binary foam agent system was applied. Molecular weight and concentration of polymer HPAM were 25 million and 0.2wt%, and DWS concentration was 0.3wt%. Alternate period of the gas-liquid mixture was 0, and permeability of the man-made homogeneous cores was about 0.8 μm2.Figure 6
Effect of gas-liquid ratio on foam flow resistance.The resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam first increased as the gas-liquid ratio went up, but then they decreased. When the gas-liquid ratio was 3 : 1, control capability of the foam flow reached its peak. When the gas-liquid ratio was below 3 : 1, there was enough gas in the porous media as the gas-liquid ratio increased, which resulted in lots of foam and increased plug capacity of foam in cores. And the resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam increased. As the gas-liquid ratio continued to increase, gas content in porous media also increased. On the one hand, more foam was generated in the porous media, which helped to plug the large pores in the cores. On the other hand, the liquid film of the foam becomes thinner, decreasing the stability of the foam and causing it to break down more easily. A gas-liquid ratio of more than 3 : 1 was too large, making it difficult for the foam to be produced in the porous media and even resulting in gas channeling. The plug capacity of the foam decreased, causing the resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam to decline.


### 3.2.2. Effects of the Gas-Liquid Alternate Period on Foam Flow Resistance

Gas-liquid alternate period of foam was researched, and results were shown in Figure7. In this investigation, a binary foam agent system was applied. Molecular weight and concentration of polymer HPAM were 25 million and 0.2wt%, and DWS concentration was 0.3wt%. The gas-liquid ratio was 3 : 1, and permeability of the man-made homogeneous cores was about 0.8 μm2.Figure 7
Effects of the gas-liquid alternate period on foam flow resistance.When the gas-liquid alternate period was 0, control capability of the foam flow reached its peak. The resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam were the largest. Resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam decreased as the gas-liquid alternate period increased. When alternate period increased, separate displacements of the gas and liquid become obvious in cores, which were unfavorable for bubble forming and reduced the foam flow resistance.


### 3.2.3. Effects of Core Permeability on Foam Flow Resistance

Effects of core permeability on foam flow resistance were shown in Figure8. In this research, a binary foam agent system was applied. Molecular weight and concentration of polymer HPAM were 25 million and 0.2wt%, and DWS concentration was 0.3wt%. The gas-liquid ratio was 3 : 1, and alternate period was 0.Figure 8
Effects of core permeability on foam flow resistance.The resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam first increased as core permeability rose, but then it decreased. When the core permeability was about 1.2μm2, control capability of the foam flow reached its peak. Results indicated that there was a matching relationship between the mobility control of the foam system and the core permeability. Flooding controls in cores of different permeability should be improved by different foam systems.


## 3.2.1. Effects of Gas-Liquid Ratio on Foam Flow Resistance

Control capability of foam flow was studied under different gas-liquid ratios, and results were shown in Figure6. In the research, a binary foam agent system was applied. Molecular weight and concentration of polymer HPAM were 25 million and 0.2wt%, and DWS concentration was 0.3wt%. Alternate period of the gas-liquid mixture was 0, and permeability of the man-made homogeneous cores was about 0.8 μm2.Figure 6
Effect of gas-liquid ratio on foam flow resistance.The resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam first increased as the gas-liquid ratio went up, but then they decreased. When the gas-liquid ratio was 3 : 1, control capability of the foam flow reached its peak. When the gas-liquid ratio was below 3 : 1, there was enough gas in the porous media as the gas-liquid ratio increased, which resulted in lots of foam and increased plug capacity of foam in cores. And the resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam increased. As the gas-liquid ratio continued to increase, gas content in porous media also increased. On the one hand, more foam was generated in the porous media, which helped to plug the large pores in the cores. On the other hand, the liquid film of the foam becomes thinner, decreasing the stability of the foam and causing it to break down more easily. A gas-liquid ratio of more than 3 : 1 was too large, making it difficult for the foam to be produced in the porous media and even resulting in gas channeling. The plug capacity of the foam decreased, causing the resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam to decline.


## 3.2.2. Effects of the Gas-Liquid Alternate Period on Foam Flow Resistance

Gas-liquid alternate period of foam was researched, and results were shown in Figure7. In this investigation, a binary foam agent system was applied. Molecular weight and concentration of polymer HPAM were 25 million and 0.2wt%, and DWS concentration was 0.3wt%. The gas-liquid ratio was 3 : 1, and permeability of the man-made homogeneous cores was about 0.8 μm2.Figure 7
Effects of the gas-liquid alternate period on foam flow resistance.When the gas-liquid alternate period was 0, control capability of the foam flow reached its peak. The resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam were the largest. Resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam decreased as the gas-liquid alternate period increased. When alternate period increased, separate displacements of the gas and liquid become obvious in cores, which were unfavorable for bubble forming and reduced the foam flow resistance.


## 3.2.3. Effects of Core Permeability on Foam Flow Resistance

Effects of core permeability on foam flow resistance were shown in Figure8. In this research, a binary foam agent system was applied. Molecular weight and concentration of polymer HPAM were 25 million and 0.2wt%, and DWS concentration was 0.3wt%. The gas-liquid ratio was 3 : 1, and alternate period was 0.Figure 8
Effects of core permeability on foam flow resistance.The resistance and residual resistance factors of the foam first increased as core permeability rose, but then it decreased. When the core permeability was about 1.2μm2, control capability of the foam flow reached its peak. Results indicated that there was a matching relationship between the mobility control of the foam system and the core permeability. Flooding controls in cores of different permeability should be improved by different foam systems.


## 3.3. Foam Flooding Results of a Parallel Natural Core

In order to further verify the displacing efficiency of foam flooding, experiments were conducted in a parallel core, and results were shown in Table2. In the experiments, the core was first flooded by HPAM with the molecular weight and concentration of 16 million and 0.1wt% and then flooded by a binary foam agent system. For the foam agent system, Molecular weight and concentration of polymer HPAM were 25 million and 0.2wt%, and DWS concentration was 0.3wt%. The gas-liquid ratio was 3 : 1, and alternate period was 0.Table 2
Foam flooding results of a parallel natural core.
Sort
Core number
Gas permeability (µm2)
Oil saturation(%)
Water flooding EOR (%)
HPAM flooding EOR (%)
Foam flooding EOR (%)
Total EOR (%)
1
L-20
0.886
69.3
50.6
9.6
9.6
69.8
L-23
0.316
67.2
46.3
7.8
11.8
65.9
Average
48.5
8.7
10.7
67.9
2
L-54
0.714
63.0
43.8
13.1
8.9
65.8
L-59
0.353
65.4
46.1
6.2
12.2
64.5
Average
45.0
9.6
10.5
65.1Enhanced recovery factor for the binary foam system exceeded 10%. Because the foam blocked the high-permeability pores effectively and enlarged sweeping volumes, it could move forward in cores homogeneously. Meanwhile, the remaining oil could be emulsified to form small oil droplets, which could enter the membrane of the foam liquid. Foam containing these oil droplets moved over a certain distance, and then the foam was broken to release the oil droplets. Subsequent foam repeated the process. It was found that the displacing efficiency of foam was better than that of polymer flooding.


## 4. Conclusions

(1)
The surface tension of DWS was approximately 25 mN/m. Ultralow interfacial tension was reached between oil and DWS with a surfactant concentration between 0.05wt% and 0.4wt%. The binary system showed splendid foam performances, and the preferential surfactant concentration was 0.3wt% with a polymer concentration of 0.2wt%.
(2)
When gas and liquid were injected simultaneously, flow control capability of the foam reached its peak at the gas-liquid ratio of 3 : 1. Enhanced oil recovery factor of the binary foam system exceeded 10% in a parallel natural core displacement after polymer flooding.



---

*Source: 105274-2013-09-16.xml*