# Microbial Contamination of DateRutab Collected from the Markets of Al-Hofuf City in Saudi Arabia

Authors: Siddig H. Hamad; Farag A. Saleh; Mutlag M. Al-Otaibi
Journal: The Scientific World Journal
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

The microbial contamination of 60 samples from six date cultivars in therutab stage purchased from different retail outlets in AL-Hofuf City, Saudi Arabia was studied. All samples were found contaminated with aerobic mesophilic bacteria at loads in the order 102 to 105 cfu/cm2 with some significant differences among varieties that can be attributed to differences in the weather conditions during rutabseason. Also all samples, except only one, were contaminated with molds and yeasts at loads in the order 102 to 103 cfu/cm2. Potentially pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus was detected in 57 samples and A. flavus/parasiticus in 13 samples, while coliforms were detected in 39 samples.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) is mainly produced in Middle Eastern and North African countries. It is considered an important subsistence food crop in most of these countries, in addition to its high cultural and religious significance. Date fruit production has constantly increased worldwide over the last four decades from 1.8 million tons in 1963 to 6.7 millions in 2003 [1]. Saudi Arabia, with about 830 thousand tons annual production, ranks as the third largest date producer in the world [1].  Rutab (an Arabic name) is a stage of maturity in which the date fruit can be consumed as human food. It is a fresh product that contains 35 to 40% water and 45 to 48% sugars (dry matter basis) [2]. Because of its high moisture content,rutab is highly susceptible to microbial growth and spoilage, especially when poor hygienic practices during handling lead to heavy microbial contamination. Microbiological studies on dates are limited, especially in the main countries of production [3–9].No published work on the microbial contamination of rutab was found.This present study was undertaken to investigate the microbial contamination ofrutabfrom different date cultivars grown in the Gulf Region in Saudi Arabia.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Rutab Samples

Therutab samples were purchased from 10 different retail outlets in Al-Hofuf City and represented the most popular six date cultivars grown in the region: Khulas, Um-Ruhaim, Hilali, Shahal, Tiar,andMegnaz. A total of 60 samples were collected at weekly interval, 10 samples from each cultivar at each sampling time, and microbial analysis was carried out on the same day.


### 2.2. Microbiological Analysis

Four fruits from eachrutabsample were transferred into sterile stomacher bags, 50 mL sterile peptone water (CM0009, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) added, and the fruits washed manually for 2 minutes in this water, then aliquots (1.0 or 0.1 mL) were plated in duplicate as 10-fold dilutions in peptone water (surface area of the 4 fruits was then measured). Three replicates were analyzed for each sample and the average microbial loads calculated and reported as colony-forming units (cfu) per cm2. Aerobic mesophilic bacteria were enumerated on plate count agar (CM0325, Oxoid) incubated at 30°C for 2 to 3 days. Coliforms were determined on violet red bile agar plates (VRBA, CM0107, Oxoid) incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Round, purple-red colonies (0.5–2 mm diameter) surrounded by purple-red haloes on VRBA plates were counted as coliforms. The presence of Escherichia coli O157 among coliforms detected on VRBA plates was tested using the Escherichia coli O157 Latex Test (DR0620, Oxoid). Yeasts and molds were counted on potato dextrose agar plates (CM0139, Oxoid) incubated at 30°C for 3 days. Staphylococcus aureus was enumerated on Staphylococcus medium no. 110 (CM0145, Oxoid) incubated at 35–37°C for 24–48 hours (colonies with yellow orange pigment and clearing zone around them) and identified using the Staphylase Test (DR0595, Oxoid). Aspergillus flavus/parasiticus was detected and enumerated on Aspergillus flavus-parasiticus agar (CM0731, Oxoid) incubated at 30°C for 48 hours. Colonies that form bright orange-yellow pigments on the colony reverse were counted as Aspergillus flavus/parasiticus.


### 2.3. Statistical Analysis

A multiple comparison statistical procedure using Fisher's least significant difference test (SAS software, version 6.11) was used to determine the significance of differences amongrutab cultivars to microbial spoilage at significance levels of P≤0.05 [10].


## 2.1. Rutab Samples

Therutab samples were purchased from 10 different retail outlets in Al-Hofuf City and represented the most popular six date cultivars grown in the region: Khulas, Um-Ruhaim, Hilali, Shahal, Tiar,andMegnaz. A total of 60 samples were collected at weekly interval, 10 samples from each cultivar at each sampling time, and microbial analysis was carried out on the same day.


## 2.2. Microbiological Analysis

Four fruits from eachrutabsample were transferred into sterile stomacher bags, 50 mL sterile peptone water (CM0009, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) added, and the fruits washed manually for 2 minutes in this water, then aliquots (1.0 or 0.1 mL) were plated in duplicate as 10-fold dilutions in peptone water (surface area of the 4 fruits was then measured). Three replicates were analyzed for each sample and the average microbial loads calculated and reported as colony-forming units (cfu) per cm2. Aerobic mesophilic bacteria were enumerated on plate count agar (CM0325, Oxoid) incubated at 30°C for 2 to 3 days. Coliforms were determined on violet red bile agar plates (VRBA, CM0107, Oxoid) incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Round, purple-red colonies (0.5–2 mm diameter) surrounded by purple-red haloes on VRBA plates were counted as coliforms. The presence of Escherichia coli O157 among coliforms detected on VRBA plates was tested using the Escherichia coli O157 Latex Test (DR0620, Oxoid). Yeasts and molds were counted on potato dextrose agar plates (CM0139, Oxoid) incubated at 30°C for 3 days. Staphylococcus aureus was enumerated on Staphylococcus medium no. 110 (CM0145, Oxoid) incubated at 35–37°C for 24–48 hours (colonies with yellow orange pigment and clearing zone around them) and identified using the Staphylase Test (DR0595, Oxoid). Aspergillus flavus/parasiticus was detected and enumerated on Aspergillus flavus-parasiticus agar (CM0731, Oxoid) incubated at 30°C for 48 hours. Colonies that form bright orange-yellow pigments on the colony reverse were counted as Aspergillus flavus/parasiticus.


## 2.3. Statistical Analysis

A multiple comparison statistical procedure using Fisher's least significant difference test (SAS software, version 6.11) was used to determine the significance of differences amongrutab cultivars to microbial spoilage at significance levels of P≤0.05 [10].


## 3. Results and Discussion

Allrutab samples from the six date varieties tested were found contaminated with aerobic mesophilic bacteria at loads in the order 102 to 105 cfu/cm2 (Table 1). The levels of contamination with these microorganisms are indices of the general microbiological quality and give idea about the expected shelf lives of the foods concerned. The highest levels of contamination with these bacteria were found in Hilali. Five samples from this variety had loads of 1.6 × 105 to 2.3 × 105, one sample a load of 3.8 × 104, and 4 samples 2.9 × 103 to 6.9 × 103 cfu/cm2. Shahal samples had generally lower loads of contamination than Hilali, with one sample having 2.6 × 105, 6 samples 1.5 × 104 to 4.5 × 104, and 3 samples 1.5 × 103 to 9.1 × 103 cfu/cm2. The loads of the other 4 varieties were still lower and comparable to each other. Um Ruhaim had loads of 1.8 × 104 to 4.4 × 104 in 4 samples, and 1.3 × 103 to 5.6 × 103 in 6 samples, Khulas had 1.3 × 104 to 4.2 × 104 in 4 samples, and 1.5 × 103 to 4.3 × 103 cfu/cm2in 6 samples, Tiar had 1.0 × 105 in one sample, 2.6 × 104 in one sample, and 1.1 × 103 to 6.5 × 103 cfu/cm2 in 8 samples, while Megnazhad 1.1 × 104 to 1.9 × 104 in 3 samples and 1.1 × 103 to 8.0 × 103 cfu/cm2 in 7 samples. The level of Hilali contamination was significantly higher than that of Khulas, Um Ruhaim, Tiar,and Megnaz; it was also higher than the level of Shahal, but the difference was not significant. On the other hand, the level of contamination of Shahal was higher than that of Khulas,Um Ruhaim, Tiar, and Megnaz, but the difference was not significant. The levels of contamination of Khulas, Um-Ruhaim, Tiar and Megnaz were quite similar (Table 1). The differences in the levels of contamination with aerobic mesophilic bacteria among these rutab samples may be attributed to differences in environmental temperatures during rutab season. Khulas, Um Ruhaim, Tiar, and Megnaz are early maturing varieties and they were sampled and analyzed by the end of August where the temperatures in Saudi Arabia were above 40°C, thus the spread of mesophilic bacteria is expected to be limited. Shahal matures in mid-August and was sampled and analyzed mid-September, where the temperatures start to drop below 40°C, while Hilali is a late maturing variety and its samples in this study were collected and analyzed in October where the temperatures were in the thirties, and hence the mesophilic bacteria are supposed to dominate in the environment.Table 1
Counts of aerobic mesophilic bacteria contaminatingrutab samples (cfu/cm2).
SampleKhulasUm-RuhaimShahalHilaliTiarMegnaz11.3×1041.8×1044.5×1044.1×1034.3 × 1035.2 × 10322.2×1034.4×1043.8×1043.2×1033.0 × 1031.9 × 10433.2×1032.8×1031.5×1046.9×1036.5 × 1032.0 × 10341.5×1035.9×1031.8×1043.8×1041.1 × 1031.1 × 10454.2×1042.4×1041.5×1032.3×1053.4 × 1031.1 × 10367.3×1022.0×1032.6×1052.9×1032.6 × 1046.7 × 10374.3×1033.9×1033.7×1031.9×1055.2 × 1031.8 × 10482.0×1043.3×1049.1×1032.0×1055.0 × 1038.0 × 10394.2×1041.3×1032.6×1041.6×1051.5 × 1034.8 × 103103.7×1035.5×1031.6×1041.8×1051.0×1055.8 × 103Mean*3.77b3.88b4.24ab4.54a3.75b3.78b*log10; means with the same letter are not significantly different (P≤0.05).Almost all samples were contaminated with varying loads of molds and yeasts (Table2), which are generally spoilage organisms, although some of them could be pathogenic. Shahal and Hilali showed the highest levels of contaminations with molds and yeasts. One Shahal sample had 1.9 × 104, 2 samples 2.3 × 103 and 4.6 × 103, and 7 samples 1.7 × 102 to 7.8 × 102 cfu/cm2. One Hilali sample had 1.1 × 104, 3 samples 1.2 × 103 to 5.9 × 103, and 6 samples 1.1 × 102 to 4.7 × 102 cfu/cm2. Two Um Ruhaim samples had 1.8 × 103 and 2.0 × 103, and 8 samples 2.0 × 102 to 6.9 × 102, cfu/cm2, while 3 Khulas samples had 1.0 × 103 to 1.2 × 103, 6 samples 2.1 × 102 to 4.8 × 102 cfu/cm2, and one sample undetectable level.  In case of Tiar, only one sample showed a level of contamination of 1.5 × 103 and the contamination of the other 9 samples was in the range 1.3 × 102 to 3.3 × 102 cfu/cm2. The contamination of Megnazsamples was 1.4 × 103 in one sample and 1.3 × 102 to 5.2 × 102 cfu/cm2 in 9 samples. Contamination of Khulas, Um Ruhaim, Tiar, and Megnazwith molds and yeasts was generally lower than that of Hilaliand Shahal, but the differences were not significant (Table 2).Table 2
Counts of yeasts and molds contaminatingrutab samples (cfu/cm2).
SampleKhulasUm-RuhaimShahalHilaliTiarMegnaz14.8 × 1022.0 × 1037.8 × 1022.5 × 1022.6 × 1025.2 × 10223.3 × 1022.4 × 1021.9 × 1041.1 × 1042.3 × 1022.2 × 10232.1 × 1023.0 × 1021.7 × 1024.7 × 1022.2 × 1021.7 × 10241.2 × 1032.0 × 1023.7 × 1025.9 × 1031.5 × 1032.6 × 1025n.d.6.9 × 1022.2 × 1021.2 × 1031.3 × 1021.4 × 10261.1 × 1033.2 × 1024.6 × 1033.4 × 1023.3 × 1021.4 × 10372.1 × 1021.8 × 1032.3 × 1031.2 × 1032.2 × 1022.2 × 10284.5 × 1023.4 × 1025.2 × 1021.8 × 1022.6 × 1021.3 × 10292.1 × 1025.3 × 1023.3 × 1022.3 × 1021.5 × 1023.2 × 102101.0 × 1034.5 × 1023.9 × 1021.1 × 1021.7 × 1022.4 × 102Mean*2.39a2.70a2.92a2.82a2.41a2.43a*log10; means with the same letter are not significantly different (P≤0.05). n.d.: not detected.Microbial contaminations in the order 105 cfu/g·cm2·mLa can be regarded as high since signs of microbial spoilage start to appear in most foods at loads of about 106 cfu/g·cm2·mL [11]. Rutab with such high microbial contamination levels is expected to have a short shelf life if kept at room temperature. This high level of contamination was mainly found in Hilali where 5 of the 10 samples tested contained more than 105 cfu/cm2 (Table 1).With respect to pathogenic microorganisms, all samples ofKhulas, Um-Ruhaim, Shahal, Hilali,and Megnazand 7 samples of Tiarwere found contaminated with the potential food poisoning bacterium Staphylococcus aureus (Table 3). The highest level of contamination with this bacterium was in Shahal, followed by Um Ruhaim, then Khulas but the differences between the three were not significant. The level of contamination of Hilali and Megnaz was significantly lower than that of Shahal, Um Ruhaim, and Khulas and the level of contamination of Tiar was still lower than all other samples with significant difference from all of them (Table 3). Rutab in Saudi Arabia is harvested manually; thus it seems that contamination of the date fruits with this bacterium came mainly from workers, and differences in the degree of contamination may be attributed to differences in the hygienic status of these workers. Staphylococcus aureus can infect and grow in wounds on the hands of workers inevitably caused during harvesting by the sharp and strong ends of the leaves of the palm tree.Table 3
Counts ofStaphylococcus aureus contaminating rutab samples (cfu/cm2).
SampleKhulasUm-RuhaimShahalHilaliTiarMegnaz11.9 × 1021.5 × 1033.5 × 1024183921.2 × 1022.4 × 1023.0 × 10252nd8632.4 × 102271.6 × 103991524477643.8 × 1021.4 × 1025585582.6 × 1021.0 × 1034.5 × 102173061.5 × 1021.0 × 1034066861.3 × 10271.1 × 103283.3 × 1021.3 × 102132.2 × 10283.5 × 1022.7 × 1022.9 × 10345433294.0 × 1022.4 × 1024723nd2.0 × 102104.4 × 1021.9 × 1034525nd76Mean*2.3ab2.37ab2.47a1.85b0.87c1.83b*log10; means with the same letter are not significantly different (P≤0.05).Coliforms were found in 39 out of the 60 samples analyzed, that is, 65% of the samples studied (Table4). Their rate of occurrence was similar in 5 cultivars ranging between 6 and 8 contaminated samples, while in Khulas only 4 samples were found contaminated. The loads were relatively low reaching the range of 102 cfu/g in only 4 samples. The source of contamination was most likely the workers who harvested rutab manually. No Escherichia coli O157 was detected among these coliforms.Table 4
Counts of coliforms (cfu/cm2) contaminating rutab samples.
SampleKhulasUm RuhaimShahalHilaliTiarMegnaz1833937n.d.91992469.1 × 102431.7 × 102nd613n.d.n.d.n.d.7nd30447141942nd5n.d.2n.d.235866n.d.10202028nd73.0 × 102n.d.9n.d.nd328n.d.1.1 × 10241n.d.39939n.d.n.d.n.d.11nd1110n.d.2223710n.d. = not detected.The potential mycotoxin producing moldsA. flavusandA. parasiticus were found in 13 out of the 60 samples analyzed, that is, 21.7% contaminated samples (results not shown). They were detected in 2 Khulas, 3 Um-Ruhaim, 4 Shahal, and 4 Hilalibut none in Tiar or Megnaz samples. The loads were generally low; the highest was 60 cfu/cm2 in one sample. In spite of their low loads in the samples, if these molds find appropriate conditions for growth and mycotoxin production, the situation can be hazardous.Microbiological information on the quality of dates is limited, especially in the main countries of production. The level of contamination of mostrutab samples in this present study may be considered satisfactory in comparison to levels reported for other fruits such as grapes with 107 yeasts g−1, and strawberries, raspberries, and blackberries with 104 to 106 g−1 yeasts, up to 104 g−1 molds, and 105 to 106 g−1 bacteria [12]. The few reports on the microbiology of date fruits were mainly on tamr (Arabic name for fully mature date fruits). A study on the microbial spoilage of rutab showed that spoilage is mainly caused by lactic acid bacteria, yeasts, and molds [7], while the microbial spoilage of tamr is caused by yeasts, molds, and bacteria [8].Tamr with moisture level raised to 27–30%, inoculated with yeast suspensions, and incubated at 25°C was spoiled in 5 days [5]. Colony counts of soft dates in the tamr stage of the order 104 cfu/g lactic acid bacteria and 102 cfu/g yeasts were reported [9]. Loose dates were found contaminated with S. aureus and aerobic colony counts of 6.3 × 105 cfu/g [6]. Date (tamr) samples purchased in stores within Greater Glasgow were found contaminated with up to 104 cfu/g aerobic mesophilic bacteria, up to 3.4 × 103 cfu/g coliforms, and up to 6.9 × 104 cfu/g yeasts and molds [4]. These authors also detected A. flavus/parasiticus, Bacillus cereus, E. coli, and S. aureus in some samples. No published work on the microbial contamination of rutab was found in the literature cited.



---

*Source: 124892-2012-04-24.xml*