# The Effect of Season and Meteorological Conditions on Parasite Infection in Farm-Maintained Mouflons (Ovis aries Musimon)

Authors: B. Pilarczyk; A. Tomza-Marciniak; R. Pilarczyk; N. Sadowska; J. Udała; J. Kuba
Journal: Journal of Parasitology Research
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Due to their limited environment, farm animals are at greater risk of parasitic infection than free-living animals, which also have greater natural resistance to parasitic diseases. The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of season and meteorological conditions (temperature and humidity) on the species composition and dynamics of parasitic infections in farmed mouflons. The study was conducted in a herd of mouflon (n=40) in an extensive system: the animals remained on pasture all year round. The herd was dewormed twice per year with albendazole. Fecal samples were collected at monthly intervals over three years and tested. The prevalence of infection was defined based on coproscopic methods. For most of the studied protozoans (except for E. parva), a greater prevalence was recorded in spring and summer (i.w. from May to September). Regarding nematodes, Capillaria spp., Nematodirus sp., and the Trichostrongylidae demonstrated a much greater prevalence in winter (i.e., in January and December). Temperature and precipitation were found to be positively correlated with intensity of infection by protozoans. However, maximum air temperature was negatively correlated with infection intensity by some nematodes. The deworming practice used in the herd (selection of substance, date, and method of dosing) did not effectively protect the mouflons against parasitoses. Changes in the microclimate resulted in high extent and intensity of mouflon infection with gastrointestinal parasites. Understanding the dynamics of parasitic infections in mouflons during the year allows the development of an appropriate preventive programme.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The European mouflon (Ovis aries musimon Schreber, 1782) is a wild mountain sheep naturally occurring in Asia. The species first arrived in Poland at the beginning of the 20th century, mainly for the purpose of enriching the selection of game animals. However, the mouflon was not well suited to the Polish climate and is nowadays kept under farmed or semicaptive conditions [1].Even if kept under farm conditions, mouflons (Ovis aries musimon) are very vulnerable to different diseases, including parasitic infections; these negatively affect the welfare of the animals and the flock by causing in emaciation and weakness, or possibly even death [2, 3]. The most significant economic impacts are the indirect losses resulting from poor feed conversion, low body weight gain, reduced milk yield of nursing mothers, metabolic disorders, reduced immunity of animals, and the need for additional veterinarian care [4]. Such diseases clearly have a serious impact on animal’s health and the profitability of mouflon breeding.Free-living animals have some natural resistance to parasitic diseases. In addition, some naturally growing plant species, such as garlic (Allium sativum), wormwood (Artemisia absinthium), black walnut (Juglans nigra), mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris), or thyme (Thymus vulgaris) also show antiparasitic properties [5–7]. Furthermore, animals kept in a restricted environment, like a farm, are at much greater risk of parasitic infection [8].The prevalence of parasitic infection is governed by a range of factors, including breeding conditions, grazing system, and seasonality of microclimatic conditions. Additionally, a key role in the spread of parasitic infections is played by the state of pastures, because the eggs excreted with faeces hatch as larvae; under appropriate conditions (temperature and humidity), they can reach the invasive stage. Understanding the dynamics of parasitic infections in mouflons during the year allows the development of an appropriate preventive programme [9, 10]. As such, monitoring parasitic infections occurring on mouflon farms is an essential part of herd management.The aim of our present study was to determine the influence of season and meteorological conditions (temperature and humidity) on the species composition and dynamics of parasitic infections in farmed mouflons.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Animals

The coproscopy studies were performed on a farm located at the edge of Puszcza Notecka in the Lubuskie voivodeship, where mouflons are kept for hobby and educational purposes. The herd of mouflons (n=40) was kept in an extensive system where they remained on pasture all year round. The grazing system was determined by locating the animals in pastures, with the animals staying in each pasture for approximately six weeks. Throughout the year, the animals had unlimited access to freshwater and salt licks (NaCl: >95%, H2O: <0.5%, and components insoluble in water: <3%). In summer, pasture fodder was the primary source of feed. In addition, the animals received meadow hay and straw. In winter, however, in addition to straw and hay, the animals were fed carrots or fodder beets, crushed oats, corn, and sugar beet pomace. The animals also received a mineral-vitamin mixture.The herd was dewormed twice per year with albendazole (10 g/100 ml). Healthcare for the herd was provided by the owners, and the farm workers are directly responsible for the animals. The use of veterinary services was ad hoc, usually in response to animal health problems. There were no natural water reservoirs (artificial waterholes) in the pastures. The mouflons themselves were imported from the Czech Republic.


### 2.2. Meteorological Data

Data on precipitation and air temperature were obtained from the measurement and observation station of the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management-National Research Institute, located 14 km from the farm. The temperature and precipitation measurements taken during the three-year research period are given in Supplementary Table1.


### 2.3. Parasitological Tests

In total, 426 faecal samples were collected at monthly intervals during three years of sampling. The prevalence (proportion of host individuals infected with a particular parasite, %, [11]) and intensity of infection (number of individuals of a particular parasite species in a single host, [11]) were defined based on coproscopic studies performed with the Willis-Schlaf and McMaster methods [12]. The species composition of coccidia was established with Pellerdi’s key [13]. These tests were supplemented with oocyst cultures performed in a moist chamber at 24-26°C. A 2.5%-aqueous solution of potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) was used as a mould-prevention agent. The species composition of the gastrointestinal nematodes was determined based on cultures of larvae hatched from isolated eggs, according to the recommendations of Gundłach and Sadzikowski [14]. Fluke eggs were detected by the decantation method [15].


### 2.4. Statistical Analysis

The results were analysed with Statistica 13.3 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, USA). Theχ2 test was used to analyse the effect of season (year) on the prevalence, whereas the significant differences in parasite infections between the sampling seasons (years) were checked with the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. The correlation between climate variables and intensity of infection was determined by Spearman’s rank-order correlation, because the intensity of infection (number of parasites per gram of faeces) did not demonstrate a normal distribution for either protozoans or nematodes. The level of statistical significance was assumed at P≤0.05.


## 2.1. Animals

The coproscopy studies were performed on a farm located at the edge of Puszcza Notecka in the Lubuskie voivodeship, where mouflons are kept for hobby and educational purposes. The herd of mouflons (n=40) was kept in an extensive system where they remained on pasture all year round. The grazing system was determined by locating the animals in pastures, with the animals staying in each pasture for approximately six weeks. Throughout the year, the animals had unlimited access to freshwater and salt licks (NaCl: >95%, H2O: <0.5%, and components insoluble in water: <3%). In summer, pasture fodder was the primary source of feed. In addition, the animals received meadow hay and straw. In winter, however, in addition to straw and hay, the animals were fed carrots or fodder beets, crushed oats, corn, and sugar beet pomace. The animals also received a mineral-vitamin mixture.The herd was dewormed twice per year with albendazole (10 g/100 ml). Healthcare for the herd was provided by the owners, and the farm workers are directly responsible for the animals. The use of veterinary services was ad hoc, usually in response to animal health problems. There were no natural water reservoirs (artificial waterholes) in the pastures. The mouflons themselves were imported from the Czech Republic.


## 2.2. Meteorological Data

Data on precipitation and air temperature were obtained from the measurement and observation station of the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management-National Research Institute, located 14 km from the farm. The temperature and precipitation measurements taken during the three-year research period are given in Supplementary Table1.


## 2.3. Parasitological Tests

In total, 426 faecal samples were collected at monthly intervals during three years of sampling. The prevalence (proportion of host individuals infected with a particular parasite, %, [11]) and intensity of infection (number of individuals of a particular parasite species in a single host, [11]) were defined based on coproscopic studies performed with the Willis-Schlaf and McMaster methods [12]. The species composition of coccidia was established with Pellerdi’s key [13]. These tests were supplemented with oocyst cultures performed in a moist chamber at 24-26°C. A 2.5%-aqueous solution of potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) was used as a mould-prevention agent. The species composition of the gastrointestinal nematodes was determined based on cultures of larvae hatched from isolated eggs, according to the recommendations of Gundłach and Sadzikowski [14]. Fluke eggs were detected by the decantation method [15].


## 2.4. Statistical Analysis

The results were analysed with Statistica 13.3 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, USA). Theχ2 test was used to analyse the effect of season (year) on the prevalence, whereas the significant differences in parasite infections between the sampling seasons (years) were checked with the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. The correlation between climate variables and intensity of infection was determined by Spearman’s rank-order correlation, because the intensity of infection (number of parasites per gram of faeces) did not demonstrate a normal distribution for either protozoans or nematodes. The level of statistical significance was assumed at P≤0.05.


## 3. Results

The prevalence ofEimeria protozoans and gastrointestinal nematodes in mouflons in experimental period is presented in Table 1. Differences in prevalence were observed between different years in Eimeria bakuensis (χ2=17.8; P≤0.001), E. ovinoidalis (χ2=8.22;P≤0.02), Strongyloides spp. (χ2=34.65;P≤0.001), and Trichostrongylidae (χ2=31.03;P≤0.001). These resulted from a significantly higher prevalence of infections observed in the third year of the experiment. The mean infection intensity of Eimeria intricata, Strongyloides sp., Trichuris ovis, Nematodirus sp., Trichostrongylidae, and Chabertia ovina was significantly (P≤0.05) higher in the first year of the experiment (Table 2).Table 1
Prevalence (%) ofEimeria protozoans and gastrointestinal nematodes in mouflons in the experimental period.
ParasitesYear IYear IIYear IIIχ2P valueTotalni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)Eimeria parva45/17525.742/15227.634/9934.32.38P=0.30121/42628.4E. bakuensis (syn. E. ovina)69/17539.464/15242.164/9964.617.80P≤0.001197/42646.2E. crandalis48/17527.436/15223.725/9925.30.60P=0.74109/42625.6E. intricata42/17524.034/15222.420/9920.20.53P=0.7796/42622.5E. ovinoidalis70/17540.066/15243.457/9957.68.22P=0.02193/42645.3Total protozoans134/17576.0109/15271.777/9977.81.37P=0.50319/42674.9Strongyloides sp.60/17534.365/15242.870/9970.734.65P≤0.001195/42645.8Capillaria sp.42/17524.024/15215.824/9924.24.04P=0.1390/42621.18Trichuris ovis30/17517.123/15215.121/9921.21.55P=0.4674/42617.4Nematodirus sp.59/17533.727/15217.820/9920.212.58P=0.002106/42624.9Chabertia ovina42/17524.625/15216.427/9927.34.95P=0.0895/42622.3Trichostrongylidae71/17540.670/15246.174/9974.731.03P≤0.001215/42650.5Total nematodes122/17569.7110/15272.480/9980.84.06P=0.13312/42673.2ni/n: number of infected animals/number of tested animals.Table 2
Intensity of infection with protozoans (oocysts per gram (OPG)) and gastrointestinal nematodes (eggs per gram (EPG)) in mouflons.
ParasitesYear IYear IIYear IIIKruskal-Wallis testTotalMeanMeRangeMeanMeRangeMeanMeRangeMeanMeRangeEimeria protozoansE. parva995050-5001125050-50011210050-200H=4.4;P=0.111075050-500E. bakuensis (syn. E. ovina)34715050-120036720050-250027315050-1200H=2.2;P=0.3432920050-2500E. crandalis15510050-50020420050-80015210050-600H=4.2;P=0.1217110050-800E. intricata120a10050-30078b5050-400185a10050-800H=12.2;P=0.00211910050-800E. ovinoidalis39925050-140035425050-220039640050-1100H=1.5;P=0.4738330050-2200Total protozoans513a27550-2950560a30050-5100658b57550-2400H=10.5;P=0.00556430050-5100Gastrointestinal nematodesStrongyloides sp.323a22550-1300200b10050-1500195b10050-1000H=7.8;P=0.0223610050-1500Capillaria sp.19910050-8001025050-4501135050-500H=5.7;P=0.0615010050-800Trichuris ovis272a15050-800111ab10050-45067b5050-100H=12.3;P=0.00216410050-800Nematodirus sp.264a10050-2300115b10050-60095b10050-300H=8.4;P=0.0219410050-2300Chabertia ovina290a30050-800116b5050-60081b5050-300H=19.9;P≤0.00118510050-800Trichostrongylidae437a40050-1200189b100b50-1200374a10050-2600H=23.6;P≤0.00133410050-2600Total nematodes785a60050-3600335b20050-2600590a30050-3350H=45.3;P≤0.00157530050-3600For most of the studied protozoans (except forE. parva), an effect of season on the prevalence of infection was observed. A much higher prevalence of infection was found in the spring and summer seasons (Table 3). For gastrointestinal nematodes, the effect of season on the prevalence of infection was found only in Capillaria sp. and Nematodirus sp. A significantly greater prevalence of infection was noted in winter than in the other seasons (Table 3). Regarding infection intensity, all Eimeria protozoans demonstrated significantly (P≤0.05) higher mean intensity in spring and summer, while the nematodes were found to have significantly greater total mean infection intensity (P≤0.05) in winter than in spring (Table 4).Table 3
Prevalence (%) ofEimeria protozoans and gastrointestinal nematodes in mouflons in specific seasons.
ParasitesWinterSpringSummerAutumnχ2PTotalni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)Eimeria protozoansE. parva28/12422.634/12128.138/9938.421/8225.67.24P=0.06121/42628.4E. bakuensis (syn. E. ovina)46/12437.174/12161.252/9952.525/8230.524.76P≤0.001197/42646.2E. crandalis15/12412.139/12132.242/9942.413/8215.933.48P≤0.001109/42625.6E. intricata10/1248.130/12124.830/9930.326/8231.722.6P≤0.00196/42622.5E. ovinoidalis35/12428.275/12162.058/9958.625/8230.542.49P≤0.001193/42645.3Total protozoans68/12454.8102/12184.388/9988.961/8274.442.42P≤0.001319/42674.9Gastrointestinal nematodesStrongyloides sp.67/12454.049/12140.545/9945.534/8241.55.38P=0.14195/42645.8Capillaria sp.38/12430.620/12116.518/9918.214/8217.19.60P=0.0290/42621.18Trichuris ovis18/12414.520/12116.519/9919.217/8220.71.64P=0.6574/42617.4Nematodirus sp.48/12438.717/12114.023/9923.218/8222.020.8P≤0.001106/42624.9Chabertia ovina34/12427.425/12120.720/9920.216/8219.52.68P=0.4495/42622.3Trichostrongylidae59/12447.654/12144.655/9955.647/8257.34.52P=0.21215/42650.5Total nematodes95/12476.683/12168.673/9973.761/8274.42.12P=0.55312/42673.2ni/n: number of infected animals/number of tested animals.Table 4
Intensity of infection withEimeria protozoans (oocysts per gram (OPG)) and gastrointestinal nematodes (eggs per gram (EPG)) in mouflons in specific seasons.
ParasitesWinterSpringSummerAutumnKruskal-Wallis testMeanMeRangeMeanMeRangeMeanMeRangeMeanMeRangeEimeria protozoansE. parva71a5050-200132b10050-500128ab10050-50076a5050-200H=17.0;P<0.001E. bakuensis (syn. E. ovina)164a10050-800431b37550-1200410b25050-2500166a10050-600H=26.8;P<0.001E. crandalis120ab5050-400213200a50-600181a10050-80069b5050-200H=17.0;P<0.001E. intricata10510050-25016210050-8001075050-300885050-400H=3.6;P=0.30E. ovinoidalis197a10050-600490b45050-1200416bc30050-2200244ac20050-600H=23.5;P<0.001Total protozoans284a15050-1450830b75050-2450686c40050-5100247a20050-1050H=66.9;P<0.001Gastrointestinal nematodesStrongyloides sp.25115050-120018010050-130029315050-150021210050-850H=4.4;P=0.21Capillaria sp.12910050-5001385050-55019210050-8001717550-800H=1.0;P=0.81Trichuris ovis16910050-80010810050-3001975050-75018510050-750H=0.1;P=0.99Nematodirus sp.19110050-6502655050-230017410050-60016410050-700H=1.7;P=0.64Chabertia ovina19910050-6001425050-8001837550-60022510050-600H=4.7;P=0.19Trichostrongylidae44310050-260024310050-120033525050-120030310050-1200H=2.2;P=0.54Total nematodes696a42550-3350401b20050-3600636ab35050-2600559ab25050-2700H=14.0;P=0.003a,bDifferent lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences at P≤0.05.For most of the studied protozoans (except forE. parva), month affected the prevalence of their infection. A much greater prevalence was recorded from May to September. For nematodes, an effect of month on the prevalence was found for Capillaria sp., Nematodirus sp., and Trichostrongylidae. A much greater prevalence was recorded in January and December and in July and August than in the other months (Table 5, Figure 1).Table 5
Prevalence (%) ofEimeria protozoans and gastrointestinal nematodes in mouflons throughout the year.
(a)MonthEimeria protozoansE. parvaE. bakuensisE. crandalisE. intricataE. ovinoidalisTotal protozoansni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)January6/4214.313/4231.08/4219.05/4211.99/4221.421/4250.0February10/4422.719/4443.23/446.81/442.316/4436.427/4461.4March12/3831.614/3836.84/3810.54/3810.510/3826.320/3852.6April10/4124.420/4148.89/4122.08/4119.516/4139.029/4170.7May11/4126.829/4170.714/4134.18/4119.526/4163.437/4190.2June13/3933.325/3964.116/3941.014/3935.933/3984.636/3992.3July15/3938.522/3956.418/3946.214/3935.930/3976.935/3989.7August15/3641.716/3644.415/3641.77/3619.418/3650.029/3680.6September8/2433.314/2458.39/2437.59/2437.510/2441.724/24100.0October7/2924.18/2927.65/2917.28/2927.611/2937.921/2972.4November8/2729.66/2722.23/2711.110/2737.07/2725.920/2774.1December6/2623.111/2642.35/2619.28/2630.87/2626.920/2676.9χ2=11.83;P=0.38χ2=34.04;P≤0.001χ2=40.28;P≤0.001χ2=32.58;P≤0.001χ2=71.47;P≤0.001χ2=53.33;P≤0.001(b)MonthGastrointestinal nematodesStrongyloides sp.Capillaria sp.Trichuris ovisNematodirus sp.Chabertia ovinaTrichostrongylidaeTotal nematodesni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)ni/nE.I. (%)January24/4257.119/4245.27/4216.724/4257.114/4233.321/4250.039/4292.9February23/4452.39/4420.54/449.113/4429.510/4422.720/4445.532/4472.7March20/3852.610/3826.37/3818.411/3828.910/3826.318/3847.424/3863.2April16/4139.08/4119.56/4114.67/4117.18/4119.518/4143.927/4165.9May14/4134.17/4117.15/4112.26/4114.68/4119.517/4141.527/4165.9June19/3948.75/3912.89/3923.14/3910.39/3923.119/3948.729/3974.4July23/3959.08/3920.511/3928.211/3928.210/3925.627/3969.234/3987.2August15/3641.79/3625.07/3619.411/3630.610/3627.819/3652.825/3669.4September7/2429.21/244.21/244.21/244.20/240.09/2437.514/2458.3October7/2924.14/2913.84/2913.83/2910.33/2910.310/2934.515/2951.7November15/2755.63/2711.17/2725.98/2729.65/2718.518/2766.724/2788.9December12/2646.27/2626.96/2623.17/2626.98/2630.819/2673.122/2684.6χ2=18.94;P=0.06χ2=24.92;P=0.009χ2=12.45;P=0.33χ2=42.36;P≤0.001χ2=15.14;P=0.17χ2=20.88;P=0.03χ2=31.32;P≤0.001Figure 1
Prevalence and intensity of infection of mouflons withEimeria protozoans (a) and gastrointestinal nematodes (b) in annual cycle.
(a)(b)The average infection intensity ofEimeria protozoans in May, June, and August was significantly (P≤0.05) higher than that in January, February, March, November, and December and higher in April and July than in February, November, and December (Figure 1, Supplementary Table S2 and S3).The correlation analysis showed that the intensity of protozoan infection was significantly and positively correlated with temperature (r=0.43,P≤0.001) (Table 6). This correlation was found to be weak for E. parva and E. ovinoidalis, (r=0.25 and r=0.20, P≤0.01; respectively), but average for E. bakuensis and E. crandalis (r=0.36,P≤0.001). For the Chabertia ovina nematodes, a significant negative correlation (r=−0.21,P≤0.05) was found between the intensity of infection and the maximum temperature. The intensity of protozoan infection was also significantly positively correlated with precipitation; however, this correlation was weak (r=0.17,P≤0.0.01).Table 6
The results of the correlation analysis (Spearman’s rank-order test) between the intensity of infection and climatic parameters.
ParasitesNMean temp.Minimal temp.Maximal temp.Precipitationr valueE. parva1210.25∗∗0.24∗∗0.25∗∗0.19∗E. bakuensis (syn. E. ovina)1970.36∗∗∗0.33∗∗∗0.39∗∗∗0.14∗E. crandalis1090.36∗∗∗0.25∗∗0.36∗∗∗0.27∗∗E. intricata96nsnsnsnsE. ovinoidalis1930.20∗∗0.19∗∗0.24∗∗∗0.16∗Total protozoans3220.43∗∗∗0.39∗∗∗0.45∗∗∗0.17∗∗Strongyloides sp.195nsnsnsnsCapillaria sp.90nsnsnsnsTrichuris ovis74nsnsnsnsNematodirus sp.106nsnsnsnsChabertia ovina95nsns-0.21∗nsTrichostrongylidae215nsnsnsnsTotal nematodes316nsnsnsns∗P≤0.05, ∗∗P≤0.01, and ∗∗∗P≤0.001; ns: nonsignificant (P>0.05).


## 4. Discussion

Continuous parasitological monitoring has become an indispensable element of animal husbandry in recent years. Systematic control of parasites as well as the use of prevention programmes developed individually for a particular farm is now an obligatory activity. During the period of parasitological monitoring, the prevalence and intensity of mouflon infection with gastrointestinal parasites were found to vary with the seasons.Mature individuals not showing clinical signs but infected with a small number of parasites may constitute themselves as healthy hosts and reservoirs of parasitic stages for the environment. In natural habitats, mouflons often change their location and feeding grounds, resulting in “natural cleansing” of the environment from invasive forms of parasites, as they simply die without being able to find a host. In turn, animals kept in closed breeding facilities always remain in the same area, causing an accumulation of invasive parasites. Cabaret et al. [9] found a significantly higher prevalence (%) and mean intensity of coccidial infection (OPG) in captive mouflons (73.17% and 814.6 OPG, respectively) than in wild mouflons (36.73% and 112.7 OPG). In our study, the mean prevalence of infection of mouflons was found to be quite high: 75.91% with Eimeria protozoans and 72.93% with gastrointestinal nematodes. In addition, our findings also indicate an increase in extent over subsequent years (Table 1), which may be explained by the gathering of mouflons in a limited area and the accumulation of oocysts/eggs in the environment. Our findings are also higher than the prevalence of coccidial infection identified in previous studies. Ferraro et al. [16] showed a lower prevalence of coccidial infection in mouflons in Italy (53.33%) than that in our study. Similar results were also obtained by Verin et al. [17] in mouflons from Apuane Alps Park (58.2%) and by Magi et al. [18] in mouflons living in Monti Livornesi Park (67%). In addition, the prevalence of infection in free-ranging mouflons from Lower Silesia (Poland) was found to be 58.27% for gastrointestinal nematodes and 44.6% for coccidia [2].In most cases, mouflons experience multiple infections with coccidia. Correlation analysis showed that the intensity of protozoan infection was significantly and positively correlated with the ambient temperature. This may be related with the dispersal strategy of the parasite. Oocysts are excreted into the environment with the faeces, but are not yet invasive. Only under the effect of favourable environmental conditions, such as the presence of oxygen and sufficient temperature and humidity, do oocysts turn infective (sporocysts). Infective sporulated oocysts show high resistance to unfavourable conditions in the external environment (they can survive for several months). The factors that favour the survival of coccidial oocysts are high humidity and favourable temperatures. A low temperature inhibits the sporogony phase and lowers the ability of sporulation under optimal conditions. Studies have found that only 10% of the oocysts reached the sporoblast stage after 14 days of storage at 4°C, and most of the remaining unsporulated oocysts degenerated, even after placing them in an area with a favourable temperature (30°C) [11, 19–21]. In our study, a significant increase in the prevalence of infection with Eimeria protozoans was observed from May to September and in the intensity of infection from May to August (Figure 1), which may indicate the weather conditions favourable for the development of parasites at that time. However, the impact of local climate on external parasite stages should be confirmed with further research. Sheep are closely related to mouflons, and thus, the species of coccidia typical in sheep are also found in mouflons. Antoszek and Balicka-Ramisz [22] showed the highest prevalence of infection in sheep from July to September. This shift in the prevalence and intensity of infection may well be due to climate change (warming).In pastures, infected mouflons shed faeces, increasing the risk of parasite infection. For gastrointestinal nematodes, the process of larval development occurs in the external environment and depends primarily on air temperature, soil humidity, and oxygen access. Under favourable climatic conditions, the risk of contamination increases rapidly [16, 23, 24].At higher temperatures in summer, larvae move quickly and hence consume more nutrients. When there are no longer nutrients, the larvae stop moving and die. This process is accelerated by water loss, which evaporates more quickly from the environment and from the body of larvae during warm periods. In colder seasons, the larvae are not very mobile, curl into a spiral, and are able to survive for a long period of time [23, 24].In the present study, a significant negative correlation was found between the intensity of infection and maximum environmental temperature forChabertia ovina nematodes. Paciejewski [23] suggests that drought inhibits the hatching of larvae in some gastrointestinal nematodes, which may result in a lower intensity of invasion. Under favourable conditions (20-25°C) and high air humidity, the larvae leave their eggshells after 16-30 days. Other authors mention that the development of larvae depends mainly on temperature.In our study, a significant increase in the prevalence of infection with gastrointestinal nematodes was observed in January, July and October. In addition, the intensity of infection peaked in March and again in August (Figure1). Undoubtedly, climatic conditions play a crucial role in spreading infection. The presence of infective eggs depends on weather conditions. The high prevalence of mouflon infection with gastrointestinal nematodes was noted in winter (January), suggesting that favourable microclimatic conditions occurred in that period. In addition, the risk of contamination may have been greatly increased by the concentration of many animals in a small area and the use of a pasture breeding system. Winter feeding could have been one of the reasons for the high extent of infection with gastrointestinal nematodes in January. The animals were fed with additional food: hay was put into the feeders, and the animals gathered around them. This feeding strategy required many individuals to gather together in one place, with a high concentration of excrement, trampling the ground that was often muddy. This could well have caused the observed increased prevalence of infection.


## 5. Conclusion

In general, the prophylactic procedures adopted on the farm (selection of substance, date and method of dosing) did not effectively protect the mouflons against parasitoses, as indicated by the high extent of infection (>70%). It was also found that the extent of infection was influenced by the season: nematodes were more prevalent in winter andEimeria in the spring and summer seasons.Microclimatic changes resulted in a high prevalence and intensity of mouflon infection with gastrointestinal parasites. Understanding the dynamics of parasitic infections in mouflons during the year can allow the development of an efficient strategic deworming programme.



---

*Source: 1165782-2022-01-25.xml*