# Upregulation of Immune Process-Associated Genes in RAW264.7 Macrophage Cells in Response toBurkholderia pseudomallei Infection

Authors: Dongmei Peng; Feng Pang; Ruiyong Cao; Shu Zhu; Xiaojian Yang; Xin Nie; Zhenxing Zhang; Baobao Li; Haifeng Huang; Yaying Li; Guohua Li; Li Du; Fengyang Wang
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Melioidosis is a severe and fatal tropical zoonosis, which is triggered byBurkholderia pseudomallei. To better understand the host’s response to infection ofB. pseudomallei, an RNA-Seq technology was used to confirm differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in RAW264.7 cells infected withB. pseudomallei. In total, 4668 DEGs were identified across three time points (4, 8, and 11 hours after infection). Short Time-Series Expression Miner (STEM) analysis revealed the temporal gene expression profiles and identified seven significant patterns in a total of 26 profiles. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) was utilized to confirm significantly enriched immune process-associated pathways, and 10 DEGs, includingCcl9, Ifnb1, Tnfα, Ptgs2, Tnfaip3, Zbp1, Ccl5, Ifi202b, Nfkbia, andNfkbie, were mapped to eight immune process-associated pathways. Subsequent quantitative real-time PCR assays confirmed that the 10 DEGs were all upregulated during infection. Overall, the results showed thatB. pseudomallei infection can initiate a time-series upregulation of immune process-associated DEGs in RAW264.7 macrophage cells. The discovery of this article helps us better understand the biological function of the immune process-associated genes duringB. pseudomallei infection and may aid in the development of prophylaxis and treatment protocols for melioidosis.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Melioidosis is a severe and fatal zoonosis most commonly found in tropical regions between the 20th parallels [1]. Melioidosis was first defined as a “glandular-like” disease by Alfred Whitmore and C.S Krishnaswami in 1911, but it was not until the latter half of 20th century that the importance of melioidosis to public health in Northern Australia and Southeast Asia was recognized [1, 2]. Latest research shows that the world is bearing a growing burden of melioidosis, with estimated 169,000 cases, around 50% mortality rate, across 34 countries each year [3]. Melioidosis is acquired via percutaneous inoculation, inhalation of aerosols, or ingestion of contaminated soil or water [4, 5]. The clinical syndromes of melioidosis include chronic abscesses, acute pneumonia, or septicemia [5, 6].B. pseudomallei is an aerobic, motile, non-spore-forming, intracellular, Gram-negative bacillus. It readily grows on common laboratory media at 37°C and resists unfavorable circumstances such as extreme temperature, poor nutrition, acidic and alkaline conditions, and dehydration [4, 7].B. pseudomallei can resist many generally used antimicrobial reagents, including aminoglycosides, penicillins, cephalosporins, and rifamycins [4, 7, 8].DuringB. pseudomallei infection, the bacteria utilize various virulence factors for survival and replication within both host macrophages and epithelial cells. The virulence factors identified to date inB. pseudomallei include capsule, lipopolysaccharide, flagella, pili, and effectors transported by type III, IV, and VI secretion systems [1, 9]. These virulence factors play important roles whenB. pseudomallei interacts with host innate immune cells.When invading into macrophage, bacteria can stimulate cell fusion and further induce the generation of multinucleated giant cells (MNGC). However, if intracellular bacterial reproduction reaches a key stage, the bacteria induce death of the host cells and are released to induce secondary infections [1, 10, 11].To better understand the molecular mechanisms of host-bacterial interactions duringB. pseudomallei infection, DNA microarray and transcriptome analyses have previously been performed usingB. pseudomallei-infected murine liver and spleen tissue. The results indicated that the Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 pathway has responsibility for initiating host defense responses toB. pseudomallei invasion, and the expression levels of genes encoding several other TLRs (TLR3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) were also modulated. Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (Nod) 1,Nod2, nucleotide-binding and leucine-rich repeat receptor family pyrin domain-containing (Nlrp) 2,Nlrp3, and class II transactivator (CIIta) were elevated upon infection. Dysregulation of these genes can activate caspase (Casp) cascades, inducing apoptosis and amplifying inflammatory responses to intracellular pathogens [12]. To identify host responses that are directly or indirectly regulated byBurkholderia invasion protein C (BipC), transcriptomic analysis of the liver and spleen tissues of infected mice was performed. The results demonstrated that BipC mainly targets cellular processes related pathways, which can modulate cellular trafficking [13].Although macrophages played a critical role in controlling bacterial replication in the early stage of infection, until now, our understanding about how macrophages respond toB. pseudomallei infection was still limited. In this study, we used an RNA-Seq based approach to carry out systemic analysis of changes in mRNA level of RAW264.7 cells infected withB. pseudomallei at 0, 4, 8, and 11 hours postinfection, hoping to find more useful details about the interaction betweenB. pseudomallei and its host.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Cell Culture andB. pseudomallei Infection

RAW264.7 cell line was purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China) and maintained as previously described [14]. TheB. pseudomallei strain used in this study, BPHN1, was isolated from a goat in Hainan Province, China. To carry out infection assays, RAW264.7 cell monolayers (~1 × 106 cells/well) in 6-well tissue culture plates were infected with the bacterial inoculum at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. After incubation for one hour at 37°C incubator, the cells were rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline, and 2 mL of fresh DMEM containing kanamycin (250 μg/mL) was added to each well. At 4, 8, or 11 hours postinfection, cells were rinsed three times with PBS and total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manuals. The collected RNA was then used for RNA-Seq and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis.


### 2.2. mRNA Library Construction and Sequencing

Construction of mRNA library and sequencing were performed as described previously [15]. Briefly, total mRNA was enriched using Oligo (dT) beads (Epicenter, Madison, WI, USA), fragmented, and reverse-transcribed. Second strand cDNA was obtained using DNA polymerase I, RNase H. Then the cDNA fragments were purified using a QIAQuick PCR Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and end-repaired; a poly(A) tail added and then ligated to Illumina sequencing adapters. The ligation products were finally sequenced using Illumina HiSeq TM2500 by Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co (Guangzhou, China).


### 2.3. Mapping and Normalization of Gene Expression Level

Clean reads were obtained by removing low quality raw reads following the basic filtering rules: removing reads containing adapters; removing reads containing more than 10% of unknown nucleotides (N); removing low quality reads containing more than 50% of low quality (Q-value ≤ 20) bases. Bowtie 2 was used to map reads to the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) database, to remove the rRNA-mapped reads [16]. The remaining reads for each sample were then mapped to the reference genome GRCm38.p4 (Ensembl release 84) using TopHat 2 (version 2.0.3.12) [17]. After mapping, Cufflinks was used to assemble transcripts, and Cuffmerge (part of the Cufflinks package) was used to merge the assembled transcripts with the reference annotation and track Cufflinks transcripts across multiple experimental groups [18]. FPKM method was used to normalize gene expression level [19].The edgeR package (http://www.r-project.org/) was used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across experimental groups [20]. And the selected standards for DEGs were fold change ≥ 2 and FDR (false discovery rate) < 0.05 in comparisons.


### 2.4. Short Time-Series Expression Miner (STEM) Analysis

STEM software could cluster, compare, and visualize gene expression trends during a short time series [21].The expression data of R0, R4, R8, and R11 sample were normalized to 0; then, log2 (R4/R0), log2 (R8/R0), and log2 (R11/R0) were clustered by STEM software as previously described [15, 21]. The clustered profiles with p value < 0.05 were considered as significant profiles.


### 2.5. KEGG Database Analysis

To identify significantly enriched signal pathways and better understand the biological functions of DEGs, the KEGG database was used for pathway annotation as Kanehisa described [22].


### 2.6. qRT-PCR Analysis of mRNA Expression

To validate the expression of DEGs, the total RNA isolated from different samples was used for qRT-PCR analysis with specific primers designed andGapdh was used as internal control as previously described [23].


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistically significant differences of each comparison were identified by Student’s t-test, and p value < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. KEGG pathways (hypergeometric p value ⩽ 0.05) were selected as the significant enrichment pathways among all DEGs.


## 2.1. Cell Culture andB. pseudomallei Infection

RAW264.7 cell line was purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China) and maintained as previously described [14]. TheB. pseudomallei strain used in this study, BPHN1, was isolated from a goat in Hainan Province, China. To carry out infection assays, RAW264.7 cell monolayers (~1 × 106 cells/well) in 6-well tissue culture plates were infected with the bacterial inoculum at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. After incubation for one hour at 37°C incubator, the cells were rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline, and 2 mL of fresh DMEM containing kanamycin (250 μg/mL) was added to each well. At 4, 8, or 11 hours postinfection, cells were rinsed three times with PBS and total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manuals. The collected RNA was then used for RNA-Seq and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis.


## 2.2. mRNA Library Construction and Sequencing

Construction of mRNA library and sequencing were performed as described previously [15]. Briefly, total mRNA was enriched using Oligo (dT) beads (Epicenter, Madison, WI, USA), fragmented, and reverse-transcribed. Second strand cDNA was obtained using DNA polymerase I, RNase H. Then the cDNA fragments were purified using a QIAQuick PCR Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and end-repaired; a poly(A) tail added and then ligated to Illumina sequencing adapters. The ligation products were finally sequenced using Illumina HiSeq TM2500 by Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co (Guangzhou, China).


## 2.3. Mapping and Normalization of Gene Expression Level

Clean reads were obtained by removing low quality raw reads following the basic filtering rules: removing reads containing adapters; removing reads containing more than 10% of unknown nucleotides (N); removing low quality reads containing more than 50% of low quality (Q-value ≤ 20) bases. Bowtie 2 was used to map reads to the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) database, to remove the rRNA-mapped reads [16]. The remaining reads for each sample were then mapped to the reference genome GRCm38.p4 (Ensembl release 84) using TopHat 2 (version 2.0.3.12) [17]. After mapping, Cufflinks was used to assemble transcripts, and Cuffmerge (part of the Cufflinks package) was used to merge the assembled transcripts with the reference annotation and track Cufflinks transcripts across multiple experimental groups [18]. FPKM method was used to normalize gene expression level [19].The edgeR package (http://www.r-project.org/) was used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across experimental groups [20]. And the selected standards for DEGs were fold change ≥ 2 and FDR (false discovery rate) < 0.05 in comparisons.


## 2.4. Short Time-Series Expression Miner (STEM) Analysis

STEM software could cluster, compare, and visualize gene expression trends during a short time series [21].The expression data of R0, R4, R8, and R11 sample were normalized to 0; then, log2 (R4/R0), log2 (R8/R0), and log2 (R11/R0) were clustered by STEM software as previously described [15, 21]. The clustered profiles with p value < 0.05 were considered as significant profiles.


## 2.5. KEGG Database Analysis

To identify significantly enriched signal pathways and better understand the biological functions of DEGs, the KEGG database was used for pathway annotation as Kanehisa described [22].


## 2.6. qRT-PCR Analysis of mRNA Expression

To validate the expression of DEGs, the total RNA isolated from different samples was used for qRT-PCR analysis with specific primers designed andGapdh was used as internal control as previously described [23].


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistically significant differences of each comparison were identified by Student’s t-test, and p value < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. KEGG pathways (hypergeometric p value ⩽ 0.05) were selected as the significant enrichment pathways among all DEGs.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Infection of RAW264.7 Cells byB. pseudomallei

RAW264.7 cells were infected byB. pseudomallei at MOI = 10. At 4h postinfection (h.p.i.); cell fusion and multinucleate giant cells (MNGC) occurred; At 8h.p.i and 11h.p.i, there were more cell fusion and MNGC formation observed (Figure 1).B. pseudomallei could survive and proliferate within the macrophage cells and protect itself from host defense because the formation of MNGC inhibited the phagocytic ability and cell division activities of the host. The total RNA of R0, R4, R8, and R11 samples were collected for RNA sequencing and further analysis with uninfected RAW264.7 cells (R0 sample) as the negative control.Figure 1
Cell fusion and formation of MNGC when the RAW264.7 cells were infected byB. pseudomallei (MOI = 10) at different time points. R0: RAW264.7 cells; R4: RAW264.7 cells at 4h.p.i; R8: RAW264.7 cells at 8h.p.i; R11: RAW264.7 cells at 11h.p.i. The black arrow showed the MNGC.


### 3.2. DEGs Statistics ofB. pseudomallei-Infected RAW264.7 Cells

The raw RNA-Seq data of four samples was deposited into Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) with the accession number SRP115993. An average of 32 million clean reads per sample were obtained after removing low quality reads. The Q20 score was all above 96% and the mapping rate to reference genome of each sample varies from 87.12% to 88.98% (Table1). All the data indicated that the quality of the RNA-Seq was excellent and could be used for further analysis.Table 1
Data summary of RNA-Seq experiments.
Sample Raw reads Clean reads Q20 Mapping rate to reference genome R0 33,995,054 33,755,316 97.15% 88.16% R4 32,631,376 32,415,278 97.23% 88.98% R8 31,079,714 30,803,170 96.85% 87.71% R11 31,307,946 31,058,640 97.03% 87.12%A total of 2448, 603, and 1722 DEGs were downregulated among comparisons of R4 versus R0, R8 versus R0, and R11 versus R0, while 935, 569, and 861 DEGs were upregulated, respectively. Obviously, the number of downregulated genes was far more than that of the upregulated genes in R4 versus R0 and R11 versus R0 groups (Figure2(a)). The results showed thatB. pseudomallei infection changed the expression level of a number of host genes.Figure 2
Large number of DEGs were induced byB. pseudomallei infection. (a) The graph showed the upregulated and downregulated DEGs from R4 versus R0, R8 versus R0, and R11 versus R0 comparisons, respectively. (b) The Venn diagram presented the number of DEGs from R4 versus R0, R8 versus R0, and R11 versus R0 comparisons.
(a) (b)


### 3.3. Identification of Upregulated Immune Process-Associated DEGs

The Venn diagram clearly identified a total of 4668 DEGs from R4 versus R0, R8 versus R0, and R11 versus R0 comparisons (Figure2(b)). STEM clustering was performed to determine the exact gene expression patterns of the DEGs across the three paired groups. As a result, 26 clustered profiles were determined and seven profiles (profiles 7, 6, 4, 3, 18, 16, and 25) were significantly enriched with hypergeometric p value < 0.05 (Figure 3). DEGs from profile 25 displayed a time gradient rising trend. KEGG cluster analysis for the 98 DEGs in profile 25 suggested that 49 DEGs with pathway annotation were mapped to 23 significant pathways (P < 0.05) (Figure 4), which included cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway, TNF signaling pathway, chemokine signaling pathway, NF-kappa B signaling pathway, Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, and NOD-like receptor signaling pathway. Among them, 16 DEGs were mapped to eight immune process-associated pathways (Table 2). After removing overlapping and low-expression DEGs (FPKM< 10 at all four time points), 10 DEGs were obtained.Table 2
DEGs from eight selected immune process-associated pathways in profile 25.
Pathway (Pathway ID) Symbol Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction (ko04060) Ccl5, Ccl9, Ccr1, Ccr2, Clcf1, Ifnb1, Il11, Osm, Tnfα, Vegfa Cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway (ko04623) Ccl5, Ifnb1, Ifi202b, Nfkbia, Zbp1 NOD-like receptor signaling pathway (ko04621) Ccl5, Nfkbia, Tnfα, Tnfaip3 TNF signaling pathway (ko04668) Ccl5, Nfkbia, Tnfα, Tnfaip3, Ptgs2 Chemokine signaling pathway (ko04062) Bcar1, Ccr1, Ccr2, Ccl5, Ccl9, Nfkbia NF-kappa B signaling pathway (ko04064) Nfkbia, Ptgs2, Tnfα, Tnfaip3 Toll-like receptor signaling pathway (ko04620) Ccl5, Ifnb1, Nfkbia, Tnfα T cell receptor signaling pathway (ko04660) Nfkbia, Nfkbie, TnfαFigure 3
Trend analysis of the 4668 DEGs by STEM. The graph showed the total of 26 gene expression patterns in which seven colored boxes represented significantly enriched profiles (p value < 0.05). The number of DEGs and p value assigned to each profile were shown.Figure 4
KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs in profile 25. Y-axis represented pathways, and X-axis represented rich factor (rich factor = the number of DEGs enriched in a pathway/the number of all genes annotated to the pathway).Color and size of each bubble represented enrichment significance and amount of DEGs enriched in a pathway, respectively.Specific primers for the 10 DEGs were designed (Supplementary Table1), and qRT-PCR were performed withGapdh as an internal control. The results indicated that the 10 DEGs, chemokine (C-C motif), ligand 9 (Ccl9), interferon beta 1, fibroblast (Ifnb1), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (Tnfα),prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (Ptgs2), tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3 (Tnfaip3),Z-DNA binding protein 1 (Zbp1), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 (Ccl5), interferon activated gene 202b (Ifi202b), nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells inhibitor, alpha (Nfkbia),and nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells inhibitor, epsilon (Nfkbie), were all upregulated (Figure 5 and Supplementary Tables 2–4). The results of qRT-PCR analysis corresponded to that of RNA-Seq screening.Figure 5
Validation of 10 DEGs by qRT-PCR. X-axis represented different time points postinfection. The left Y-axis represented the relative mRNA expression level of the DEGs by qRT-PCR, while the right Y-axis represented the FPKM of the DEGs from RNA-Seq. Data from qRT-PCR were means of three independent replicates and bars represented SD.


## 3.1. Infection of RAW264.7 Cells byB. pseudomallei

RAW264.7 cells were infected byB. pseudomallei at MOI = 10. At 4h postinfection (h.p.i.); cell fusion and multinucleate giant cells (MNGC) occurred; At 8h.p.i and 11h.p.i, there were more cell fusion and MNGC formation observed (Figure 1).B. pseudomallei could survive and proliferate within the macrophage cells and protect itself from host defense because the formation of MNGC inhibited the phagocytic ability and cell division activities of the host. The total RNA of R0, R4, R8, and R11 samples were collected for RNA sequencing and further analysis with uninfected RAW264.7 cells (R0 sample) as the negative control.Figure 1
Cell fusion and formation of MNGC when the RAW264.7 cells were infected byB. pseudomallei (MOI = 10) at different time points. R0: RAW264.7 cells; R4: RAW264.7 cells at 4h.p.i; R8: RAW264.7 cells at 8h.p.i; R11: RAW264.7 cells at 11h.p.i. The black arrow showed the MNGC.


## 3.2. DEGs Statistics ofB. pseudomallei-Infected RAW264.7 Cells

The raw RNA-Seq data of four samples was deposited into Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) with the accession number SRP115993. An average of 32 million clean reads per sample were obtained after removing low quality reads. The Q20 score was all above 96% and the mapping rate to reference genome of each sample varies from 87.12% to 88.98% (Table1). All the data indicated that the quality of the RNA-Seq was excellent and could be used for further analysis.Table 1
Data summary of RNA-Seq experiments.
Sample Raw reads Clean reads Q20 Mapping rate to reference genome R0 33,995,054 33,755,316 97.15% 88.16% R4 32,631,376 32,415,278 97.23% 88.98% R8 31,079,714 30,803,170 96.85% 87.71% R11 31,307,946 31,058,640 97.03% 87.12%A total of 2448, 603, and 1722 DEGs were downregulated among comparisons of R4 versus R0, R8 versus R0, and R11 versus R0, while 935, 569, and 861 DEGs were upregulated, respectively. Obviously, the number of downregulated genes was far more than that of the upregulated genes in R4 versus R0 and R11 versus R0 groups (Figure2(a)). The results showed thatB. pseudomallei infection changed the expression level of a number of host genes.Figure 2
Large number of DEGs were induced byB. pseudomallei infection. (a) The graph showed the upregulated and downregulated DEGs from R4 versus R0, R8 versus R0, and R11 versus R0 comparisons, respectively. (b) The Venn diagram presented the number of DEGs from R4 versus R0, R8 versus R0, and R11 versus R0 comparisons.
(a) (b)


## 3.3. Identification of Upregulated Immune Process-Associated DEGs

The Venn diagram clearly identified a total of 4668 DEGs from R4 versus R0, R8 versus R0, and R11 versus R0 comparisons (Figure2(b)). STEM clustering was performed to determine the exact gene expression patterns of the DEGs across the three paired groups. As a result, 26 clustered profiles were determined and seven profiles (profiles 7, 6, 4, 3, 18, 16, and 25) were significantly enriched with hypergeometric p value < 0.05 (Figure 3). DEGs from profile 25 displayed a time gradient rising trend. KEGG cluster analysis for the 98 DEGs in profile 25 suggested that 49 DEGs with pathway annotation were mapped to 23 significant pathways (P < 0.05) (Figure 4), which included cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway, TNF signaling pathway, chemokine signaling pathway, NF-kappa B signaling pathway, Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, and NOD-like receptor signaling pathway. Among them, 16 DEGs were mapped to eight immune process-associated pathways (Table 2). After removing overlapping and low-expression DEGs (FPKM< 10 at all four time points), 10 DEGs were obtained.Table 2
DEGs from eight selected immune process-associated pathways in profile 25.
Pathway (Pathway ID) Symbol Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction (ko04060) Ccl5, Ccl9, Ccr1, Ccr2, Clcf1, Ifnb1, Il11, Osm, Tnfα, Vegfa Cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway (ko04623) Ccl5, Ifnb1, Ifi202b, Nfkbia, Zbp1 NOD-like receptor signaling pathway (ko04621) Ccl5, Nfkbia, Tnfα, Tnfaip3 TNF signaling pathway (ko04668) Ccl5, Nfkbia, Tnfα, Tnfaip3, Ptgs2 Chemokine signaling pathway (ko04062) Bcar1, Ccr1, Ccr2, Ccl5, Ccl9, Nfkbia NF-kappa B signaling pathway (ko04064) Nfkbia, Ptgs2, Tnfα, Tnfaip3 Toll-like receptor signaling pathway (ko04620) Ccl5, Ifnb1, Nfkbia, Tnfα T cell receptor signaling pathway (ko04660) Nfkbia, Nfkbie, TnfαFigure 3
Trend analysis of the 4668 DEGs by STEM. The graph showed the total of 26 gene expression patterns in which seven colored boxes represented significantly enriched profiles (p value < 0.05). The number of DEGs and p value assigned to each profile were shown.Figure 4
KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs in profile 25. Y-axis represented pathways, and X-axis represented rich factor (rich factor = the number of DEGs enriched in a pathway/the number of all genes annotated to the pathway).Color and size of each bubble represented enrichment significance and amount of DEGs enriched in a pathway, respectively.Specific primers for the 10 DEGs were designed (Supplementary Table1), and qRT-PCR were performed withGapdh as an internal control. The results indicated that the 10 DEGs, chemokine (C-C motif), ligand 9 (Ccl9), interferon beta 1, fibroblast (Ifnb1), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (Tnfα),prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (Ptgs2), tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3 (Tnfaip3),Z-DNA binding protein 1 (Zbp1), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 (Ccl5), interferon activated gene 202b (Ifi202b), nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells inhibitor, alpha (Nfkbia),and nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells inhibitor, epsilon (Nfkbie), were all upregulated (Figure 5 and Supplementary Tables 2–4). The results of qRT-PCR analysis corresponded to that of RNA-Seq screening.Figure 5
Validation of 10 DEGs by qRT-PCR. X-axis represented different time points postinfection. The left Y-axis represented the relative mRNA expression level of the DEGs by qRT-PCR, while the right Y-axis represented the FPKM of the DEGs from RNA-Seq. Data from qRT-PCR were means of three independent replicates and bars represented SD.


## 4. Discussion

Common hosts ofB. pseudomallei include human, nonhuman primate, equid, goat, and rodent. Accumulating evidence indicated that melioidosis is transmitted by rodents including mouse [24]. In the study, RAW 264.7, a transformed murine macrophage cell line, was used as the infection modelin vitro. During the early phase ofB. pseudomallei infection, macrophages kill bacterial cells through the production of nitric oxide. This activity depends on INF-γ, which is originated from TCR-gamma delta T cells, CD8+ cells, and natural killer cells [25].STEM software can cluster, compare, and visualize gene expression datasets during a short time series and compare the expression trends of these genes under different experimental conditions [21]. KEGG integrates genomic, chemical, network information databases and associated software [22, 26, 27]. In the study, we identified 26 gene expression profiles using the STEM software. After KEGG pathway analysis, seven significant enrichment profiles were acquired. In profile 7, DEGs with pathway annotation were mainly mapped to pathways in cancer, HTLV-I infection, thyroid hormone signaling pathway, focal adhesion, and AMPK signaling pathway. In profile 6, DEGs with pathway annotation were mainly mapped to cell cycle, inositol phosphate metabolism, regulation of actin cytoskeleton, and phosphatidylinositol signaling system. In profile 4, DEGs with pathway annotation were mainly mapped to lysosome, endocytosis, calcium signaling pathway and phosphatidylinositol signaling system. In profile 3, DEGs with pathway annotation were mainly mapped to pathways in cancer, cell cycle, fanconi anemia pathway, and hepatitis B. In profile 18, DEGs with pathway annotation were mainly mapped to ribosome, oxidative phosphorylation, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In profile 16, DEGs with pathway annotation were mainly mapped to influenza A, hepatitis C, herpes simplex infection, and measles (Supplementary Figure 1). Differently, in profile 25, 49 DEGs with pathway annotation were mainly mapped to cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway, TNF signaling pathway, chemokine signaling pathway, NF-kappa B signaling pathway, Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, and NOD-like receptor signaling pathway. Compared to the other six gene profiles, profile 25 contained many immune-associated pathways, and that is why we select it for further research, as it can help us to improve the understanding about the interaction between host cells andB. pseudomallei. 10 genes from profile 25 were confirmed using qRT-PCR assays, which suggested that the research strategy was feasible and effective.Previous research ofB. pseudomallei infection reported the upregulation ofTnfα andPtgs2, two of the 10 DEGs identified in the current study [6, 28]. DuringB. pseudomallei infection, NF-κB is activated, leading to the translation of IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-10, IL-1β, keratinocyte chemoattractant (CXCL1), TNF-α, and other proinflammatory cytokines. Activation of macrophage byB. pseudomallei also leads to generation of TNF-α [6]. InB. pseudomallei-infected THP-1 human monocytic leukemia cells, the upregulation of various inflammatory genes, includingTnfα andPtgs2 (the corresponding protein of which is also known as cyclooxygenase, COX-2), was observed [28]. These proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, can enhance the systemic inflammatory response, often multiplied by inducing continuous generation of PGE2 as well as other prostaglandins. PGE2 can increase the transactivation of NF-κB and further increase the generation of proinflammatory cytokines via a positive feedback mechanism [29, 30]. It is an effective therapeutic strategy for melioidosis to subsequently reduce PGE2 production via COX-2 inhibition [31].Until now, there has been no direct experimental data to confirm that the expression ofTnfaip3,Zbp1,Ccl9,Ifnb1,Ccl5, andIfi202b is upregulated in macrophages infected withB. pseudomallei. However, studies using similar stimulation but in different cell lines demonstrated the upregulation of 6 of the 10 DEGs identified in the current study.Tnfaip3 (also calledA20) was first defined as aTnf-inducible gene in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, involved in inhibiting NF-κB signaling and inflammation, and it can protect cells fromTnfα-induced cytotoxicity [32, 33]. Overexpression ofA20 can inhibitTnfα-induced apoptosis and NF-κB activation [34]. ZBP1, the product of DEGZbp1, was originally described as a protein that was highly upregulated in response to lipopolysaccharide and IFN-γ stimulation in macrophages [35].During osteoclast differentiation of rat bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells,Ccl9 mRNA was highly upregulated. And under TNF superfamily member stimulation, the expression ofCcl9 mRNA was increased by over 100-fold [36–38]. Downregulation ofCcl9 chemokines by fusion protein BCR-ABL could help leukemic cells evade the immune system [39]. In primary microglia stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (10 ng/mL), the expression of inflammatory genes, includingTnfα andCcl5, was significantly upregulated [37]. In addition, the expression ofIfnb1 in the lymphocytes of melioidosis patients was upregulated compared with that in other sepsis cases [40].Ifi202b, a member of the interferon- (Ifn-) inducibleIfi200 gene family, encodes p202b, which isIfn-inducible, and differs from p202a with only 7 of 445 amino acids. Expression ofIfi202 mRNA can be detected in many kinds of adult mouse tissues [41]. Expression ofIfi202 is upregulated by both type I and II interferons viaIfn-responsive cis-elements, termedIfn-stimulated response elements, in the promoter region [42].There are few reports regarding the expression ofNfkbia andNfkbie during bacterial infection; however, genetic variations withinNfkbia andNfkbie have been shown to influence susceptibility to invasive pneumococcal disease [4]. In the study, 10 DEGs were validated by qRT-PCR, and these DEGs were all immune associated. However, further studies are necessary to propose the hypothesis that tries to include some/all of DEGs into the known molecular and transcriptomic network ofB. pseudomallei-infected macrophages.In the study, we found that the number of DEGs from R8 versus R0 comparison was much less than that of R4 versus R0 and R11 versus R0 comparison. Only one biological replicate at each time point may be responsible for this result because only one biological replicate will lead to poor sensitivity or specificity in differential expression testing. Multiple biological replicates not only can decrease the background differences among samples, but also can measure the degree of variation within the same group and eliminate intragroup errors. By calculating the correlation among the samples in the same group, abnormal samples can be found and excluded. To sum up, multiple biological replicates potentially improve the reliability of results and should be incorporated for future RNA-Seq studies. Despite the limitation, our RNA-Seq findings have largely been validated by qPCR, which can deepen the understanding of the interactive mechanism betweenB. pseudomallei and host cells.


## 5. Conclusions

In this study, we identified 4668 DEGs in RAW264.7 cells during the early course ofB. pseudomallei infection. After STEM clustering and KEGG enrichment analysis, 10 immune process-associated genes in RAW264.7 macrophage cells were shown to be upregulated in response toB. pseudomallei infection. Our findings can improve the understanding of the biological function of the ten immune process-associated genes duringB. pseudomallei infection and are valuable for the prophylaxis and treatment of melioidosis. However, further functional analysis of the ten immune process-associated genes is still required and warranted.



---

*Source: 1235097-2018-06-04.xml*