mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

Následující den, a sice 29. května 2019, Openbaar Ministerie (státní zastupitelství, Nizozemsko) na základě článku 23 Overleveringswet (zákon o předávání osob) ze dne 29. dubna 2004, ve znění použitelném ve věci v původním řízení, předložilo věc rechtbank Amsterdam (soud v Amsterodamu, Nizozemsko) za účelem přezkumu uvedeného evropského zatýkacího rozkazu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Openbaar Ministerie, Nizozemsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (soud v Amsterodamu, Nizozemsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "článku 23 Overleveringswet (zákon o předávání osob) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Openbaar Ministerie, Nizozemsko)"->"předložilo věc za účelem přezkumu uvedeného evropského zatýkacího rozkazu. 29/05/2019";
  "předložilo věc za účelem přezkumu uvedeného evropského zatýkacího rozkazu. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (soud v Amsterodamu, Nizozemsko)";
  "předložilo věc za účelem přezkumu uvedeného evropského zatýkacího rozkazu. 29/05/2019"->"článku 23 Overleveringswet (zákon o předávání osob) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den følgende dag, den 29. maj 2019, indbragte Openbaar Ministerie (anklagemyndigheden, Nederlandene) i medfør af artikel 23 i Overleveringswet (lov om overgivelse) af 29. april 2004 i den udgave, der finder anvendelse på hovedsagen, sagen for rechtbank Amsterdam (retten i første instans i Amsterdam, Nederlandene) med henblik på prøvelse af nævnte europæiske arrestordre.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (anklagemyndigheden, Nederlandene)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam retten i første instans i Amsterdam, Nederlandene"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artikel 23 i Overleveringswet (lov om overgivelse) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (anklagemyndigheden, Nederlandene)"->"indbragte Openbaar Ministerie (anklagemyndigheden, Nederlandene) i medfør af artikel 23 i Overleveringswet (lov om overgivelse) af 29. april 2004 i den udgave, der finder anvendelse på hovedsagen, sagen for rechtbank Amsterdam (retten i første instans i Amsterdam, Nederlandene) med henblik på prøvelse af nævnte europæiske arrestordre. 29/05/2019";
  "indbragte Openbaar Ministerie (anklagemyndigheden, Nederlandene) i medfør af artikel 23 i Overleveringswet (lov om overgivelse) af 29. april 2004 i den udgave, der finder anvendelse på hovedsagen, sagen for rechtbank Amsterdam (retten i første instans i Amsterdam, Nederlandene) med henblik på prøvelse af nævnte europæiske arrestordre. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam retten i første instans i Amsterdam, Nederlandene";
  "indbragte Openbaar Ministerie (anklagemyndigheden, Nederlandene) i medfør af artikel 23 i Overleveringswet (lov om overgivelse) af 29. april 2004 i den udgave, der finder anvendelse på hovedsagen, sagen for rechtbank Amsterdam (retten i første instans i Amsterdam, Nederlandene) med henblik på prøvelse af nævnte europæiske arrestordre. 29/05/2019"->"artikel 23 i Overleveringswet (lov om overgivelse) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

Am Tag darauf, dem 29. Mai 2019, legte das Openbaar Ministerie (Staatsanwaltschaft, Niederlande) gemäß Art. 23 der Overleveringswet (Übergabegesetz) vom 29. April 2004 in seiner auf das Ausgangsverfahren anwendbaren Fassung der Rechtbank Amsterdam (erstinstanzliches Gericht Amsterdam, Niederlande) diesen Europäischen Haftbefehl zur Prüfung vor.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Staatsanwaltschaft, Niederlande)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (erstinstanzliches Gericht Amsterdam, Niederlande)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Art. 23 der Overleveringswet (Übergabegesetz) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Staatsanwaltschaft, Niederlande)"->"legte diesen Europäischen Haftbefehl zur Prüfung vor. 29/05/2019";
  "legte diesen Europäischen Haftbefehl zur Prüfung vor. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (erstinstanzliches Gericht Amsterdam, Niederlande)";
  "legte diesen Europäischen Haftbefehl zur Prüfung vor. 29/05/2019"->"Art. 23 der Overleveringswet (Übergabegesetz) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Openbaar Ministerie (prokuratuur, Madalmaad) esitas järgmisel päeval, st 29. mail 201929. aprilli 2004. aasta üleandmisseaduse (Overleveringswet) põhikohtuasja suhtes kohaldamisele kuuluva redaktsiooni artikli 23 alusel Rechtbank Amsterdamile (Amsterdami esimese astme kohus, Madalmaad) taotluse Euroopa vahistamismääruse kontrollimiseks.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Openbaar Ministerie, Madalmaad)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdami esimese astme kohus, Madalmaad)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Overleveringswet'i (üleandmisseadus) artikkel 23 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Openbaar Ministerie, Madalmaad)"->"esitas taotluse Euroopa vahistamismääruse kontrollimiseks. 29/05/2019";
  "esitas taotluse Euroopa vahistamismääruse kontrollimiseks. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdami esimese astme kohus, Madalmaad)";
  "esitas taotluse Euroopa vahistamismääruse kontrollimiseks. 29/05/2019"->"Overleveringswet'i (üleandmisseadus) artikkel 23 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Τη μεθεπομένη, ήτοι στις 29 Μαΐου 2019, η Openbaar Ministerie (εισαγγελική αρχή, Κάτω Χώρες) ζήτησε, κατ’ εφαρμογήν του άρθρου 23 του Overleveringswet (νόμου περί παραδόσεως), της 29ης Απριλίου 2004, όπως ίσχυε κατά τον χρόνο των πραγματικών περιστατικών της υποθέσεως της κύριας δίκης, από το rechtbank Amsterdam (πλημμελειοδικείο Άμστερνταμ, Κάτω Χώρες) την εξέταση του εν λόγω ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie Openbaar Ministerie (εισαγγελική αρχή, Κάτω Χώρες)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (πλημμελειοδικείο Άμστερνταμ, Κάτω Χώρες)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "του άρθρου 23 του Overleveringswet (νόμου περί παραδόσεως) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie Openbaar Ministerie (εισαγγελική αρχή, Κάτω Χώρες)"->"ζήτησε, κατ’ εφαρμογήν του άρθρου 23 του Overleveringswet (νόμου περί παραδόσεως), της 29ης Απριλίου 2004, την εξέταση του εν λόγω ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως. 29/05/2019";
  "ζήτησε, κατ’ εφαρμογήν του άρθρου 23 του Overleveringswet (νόμου περί παραδόσεως), της 29ης Απριλίου 2004, την εξέταση του εν λόγω ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (πλημμελειοδικείο Άμστερνταμ, Κάτω Χώρες)";
  "ζήτησε, κατ’ εφαρμογήν του άρθρου 23 του Overleveringswet (νόμου περί παραδόσεως), της 29ης Απριλίου 2004, την εξέταση του εν λόγω ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως. 29/05/2019"->"του άρθρου 23 του Overleveringswet (νόμου περί παραδόσεως) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

Le jour suivant, soit le 29 mai 2019, l’Openbaar Ministerie (ministère public, Pays-Bas) a, en application de l’article 23 de l’Overleveringswet (loi relative à la remise), du 29 avril 2004, dans sa version applicable à l’affaire au principal, saisi le rechtbank Amsterdam (tribunal d’Amsterdam, Pays-Bas) pour examen dudit mandat d’arrêt européen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie Openbaar Ministerie (ministère public, Pays-Bas)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (tribunal d’Amsterdam, Pays-Bas)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l’article 23 de l’Overleveringswet (loi relative à la remise) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie Openbaar Ministerie (ministère public, Pays-Bas)"->"a, en application de l’article 23 de l’Overleveringswet (loi relative à la remise), du 29 avril 2004, dans sa version applicable à l’affaire au principal, saisi le rechtbank Amsterdam (tribunal d’Amsterdam, Pays-Bas) pour examen dudit mandat d’arrêt européen. 29/05/2019";
  "a, en application de l’article 23 de l’Overleveringswet (loi relative à la remise), du 29 avril 2004, dans sa version applicable à l’affaire au principal, saisi le rechtbank Amsterdam (tribunal d’Amsterdam, Pays-Bas) pour examen dudit mandat d’arrêt européen. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (tribunal d’Amsterdam, Pays-Bas)";
  "a, en application de l’article 23 de l’Overleveringswet (loi relative à la remise), du 29 avril 2004, dans sa version applicable à l’affaire au principal, saisi le rechtbank Amsterdam (tribunal d’Amsterdam, Pays-Bas) pour examen dudit mandat d’arrêt européen. 29/05/2019"->"l’article 23 de l’Overleveringswet (loi relative à la remise) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Sljedećeg je dana, 29. svibnja 2019., Openbaar Ministerie (Državno odvjetništvo, Nizozemska), u skladu s člankom 23. Overleveringsweta (Zakon o predaji), od 29. travnja 2004., u verziji koja se primjenjuje u glavnom postupku, pokrenuo pred rechtbank Amsterdam (Sud u Amsterdamu, Nizozemska) postupak ispitivanja navedenog europskog uhidbenog naloga.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Državno odvjetništvo, Nizozemska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Sud u Amsterdamu, Nizozemska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "člankom 23. Overleveringsweta (Zakon o predaji) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Državno odvjetništvo, Nizozemska)"->"pokrenuo postupak ispitivanja navedenog europskog uhidbenog naloga 29/05/2019";
  "pokrenuo postupak ispitivanja navedenog europskog uhidbenog naloga 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Sud u Amsterdamu, Nizozemska)";
  "pokrenuo postupak ispitivanja navedenog europskog uhidbenog naloga 29/05/2019"->"člankom 23. Overleveringsweta (Zakon o predaji) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il giorno successivo, ossia il 29 maggio 2019, l’Openbaar Ministerie (pubblico ministero, Paesi Bassi), conformemente all’articolo 23 dell’Overleveringswet (legge sulla consegna), del 29 aprile 2004, nella versione applicabile al procedimento principale, ha sottoposto al rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunale di Amsterdam, Paesi Bassi) l’esame del suddetto mandato d’arresto europeo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (pubblico ministero, Paesi Bassi)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunale di Amsterdam, Paesi Bassi)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "articolo 23 dell’Overleveringswet (legge sulla consegna) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (pubblico ministero, Paesi Bassi)"->"ha sottoposto al rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunale di Amsterdam, Paesi Bassi) l’esame del suddetto mandato d’arresto europeo. 29/05/2019";
  "ha sottoposto al rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunale di Amsterdam, Paesi Bassi) l’esame del suddetto mandato d’arresto europeo. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunale di Amsterdam, Paesi Bassi)";
  "ha sottoposto al rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunale di Amsterdam, Paesi Bassi) l’esame del suddetto mandato d’arresto europeo. 29/05/2019"->"articolo 23 dell’Overleveringswet (legge sulla consegna) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Dienu vēlāk, 2019. gada 29. maijā, Openbaar Ministerie (prokuratūra, Nīderlande), piemērojot 2004. gada 29. aprīļaOverleveringswet (Likums par personu nodošanu) 23. pantu, redakcijā, kas ir piemērojama pamatlietā, vērsās rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdamas tiesa, Nīderlande), lūdzot izvērtēt minēto Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Prokuratūra, Nīderlande)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdamas tiesa, Nīderlande)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "2004. gada 29. aprīļaOverleveringswet (Likums par personu nodošanu) 23. pants 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Prokuratūra, Nīderlande)"->"lūdzot izvērtēt minēto Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi. 29/05/2019";
  "lūdzot izvērtēt minēto Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdamas tiesa, Nīderlande)";
  "lūdzot izvērtēt minēto Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi. 29/05/2019"->"2004. gada 29. aprīļaOverleveringswet (Likums par personu nodošanu) 23. pants 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Dar kitą dieną, 2019 m. gegužės 29 d., Openbaar Ministerie (prokuratūra, Nyderlandai) pagal pagrindinėje byloje taikomos redakcijos 2004 m. balandžio 29 d.Overleveringswet (Įstatymas dėl perdavimo) 23 straipsnį kreipėsi į Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdamo teismas, Nyderlandai) dėl minėto Europos arešto orderio nagrinėjimo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (prokuratūra, Nyderlandai)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdamo teismas, Nyderlandai)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Overleveringswet (Įstatymas dėl perdavimo) 23 straipsnį 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (prokuratūra, Nyderlandai)"->"kreipėsi į Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdamo teismas, Nyderlandai) dėl minėto Europos arešto orderio nagrinėjimo. 29/05/2019";
  "kreipėsi į Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdamo teismas, Nyderlandai) dėl minėto Europos arešto orderio nagrinėjimo. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdamo teismas, Nyderlandai)";
  "kreipėsi į Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdamo teismas, Nyderlandai) dėl minėto Europos arešto orderio nagrinėjimo. 29/05/2019"->"Overleveringswet (Įstatymas dėl perdavimo) 23 straipsnį 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Az azt követő napon, 2019. május 29‑én az Openbaar Ministerie (ügyészség, Hollandia) az Overleveringswet (az átadásról szóló törvény) alapügyben alkalmazandó változatának 23. cikke alapján az említett európai elfogatóparancs vizsgálata céljából a rechtbank Amsterdamhoz (amszterdami bíróság, Hollandia) fordult.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (ügyészség, Hollandia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (amszterdami bíróság, Hollandia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "az Overleveringswet (az átadásról szóló törvény) alapügyben alkalmazandó változatának 23. cikke 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (ügyészség, Hollandia)"->"az említett európai elfogatóparancs vizsgálata céljából a rechtbank Amsterdamhoz (amszterdami bíróság, Hollandia) fordult. 29/05/2019";
  "az említett európai elfogatóparancs vizsgálata céljából a rechtbank Amsterdamhoz (amszterdami bíróság, Hollandia) fordult. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (amszterdami bíróság, Hollandia)";
  "az említett európai elfogatóparancs vizsgálata céljából a rechtbank Amsterdamhoz (amszterdami bíróság, Hollandia) fordult. 29/05/2019"->"az Overleveringswet (az átadásról szóló törvény) alapügyben alkalmazandó változatának 23. cikke 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fil-jum ta’ wara, id‑29 ta’ Mejju 2019, l-Openbaar Ministerie (l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur, il-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi), skont l-Artikolu 23 tal-Overleveringswet (il-Liġi dwar il-Konsenja) tad‑29 ta’ April 2004 fil-verżjoni tiegħu applikabbli għall-kawża prinċipali, adixxa lir-rechtbank Amsterdam (il-Qorti Distrettwali ta’ Amsterdam, il-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi) sabiex teżamina l-imsemmi mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Openbaar Ministerie, il-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (il-Qorti Distrettwali ta’ Amsterdam, il-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Artikolu 23 tal-Overleveringswet (il-Liġi dwar il-Konsenja) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Openbaar Ministerie, il-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi)"->"adixxa lir-rechtbank Amsterdam (il-Qorti Distrettwali ta’ Amsterdam, il-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi) sabiex teżamina l-imsemmi mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew. 29/05/2019";
  "adixxa lir-rechtbank Amsterdam (il-Qorti Distrettwali ta’ Amsterdam, il-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi) sabiex teżamina l-imsemmi mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (il-Qorti Distrettwali ta’ Amsterdam, il-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi)";
  "adixxa lir-rechtbank Amsterdam (il-Qorti Distrettwali ta’ Amsterdam, il-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi) sabiex teżamina l-imsemmi mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew. 29/05/2019"->"Artikolu 23 tal-Overleveringswet (il-Liġi dwar il-Konsenja) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

De dag daarop, op 29 mei 2019, heeft het Openbaar Ministerie (Nederland) overeenkomstig artikel 23 van de Overleveringswet van 29 april 2004, in de op het hoofdgeding toepasselijke versie, de rechtbank Amsterdam (Nederland) aangezocht voor de toetsing van dat Europees aanhoudingsbevel.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie Openbaar Ministerie (Nederland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam rechtbank Amsterdam (Nederland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artikel 23 van de Overleveringswet 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie Openbaar Ministerie (Nederland)"->"aangezocht voor de toetsing van dat Europees aanhoudingsbevel 29/05/2019";
  "aangezocht voor de toetsing van dat Europees aanhoudingsbevel 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam rechtbank Amsterdam (Nederland)";
  "aangezocht voor de toetsing van dat Europees aanhoudingsbevel 29/05/2019"->"artikel 23 van de Overleveringswet 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

Kolejnego dnia, tj. 29 maja 2019 r., Openbaar Ministerie (prokuratura, Niderlandy) na podstawie art. 23 Overleveringswet (ustawy o przekazywaniu osób) z dnia 29 kwietnia 2004 r., w jej brzmieniu mającym zastosowanie do sprawy rozpatrywanej w postępowaniu głównym, zwróciła się do rechtbank Amsterdam (sądu rejonowego w Amsterdamie, Niderlandy) o rozpatrzenie przedmiotowego europejskiego nakazu aresztowania.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie Openbaar Ministerie (prokuratura, Niderlandy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (sądu rejonowego w Amsterdamie, Niderlandy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "art. 23 Overleveringswet (ustawy o przekazywaniu osób) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie Openbaar Ministerie (prokuratura, Niderlandy)"->"zwróciła się do rechtbank Amsterdam (sądu rejonowego w Amsterdamie, Niderlandy) o rozpatrzenie przedmiotowego europejskiego nakazu aresztowania. 29/05/2019";
  "zwróciła się do rechtbank Amsterdam (sądu rejonowego w Amsterdamie, Niderlandy) o rozpatrzenie przedmiotowego europejskiego nakazu aresztowania. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (sądu rejonowego w Amsterdamie, Niderlandy)";
  "zwróciła się do rechtbank Amsterdam (sądu rejonowego w Amsterdamie, Niderlandy) o rozpatrzenie przedmiotowego europejskiego nakazu aresztowania. 29/05/2019"->"art. 23 Overleveringswet (ustawy o przekazywaniu osób) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

No dia a seguir, 29 de maio de 2019, o Openbaar Ministerie (Ministério Público, Países Baixos), em aplicação do artigo 23.o da Overleveringswet (Lei Relativa à Entrega), de 29 de abril de 2004, na sua versão aplicável ao processo principal, apresentou no rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Amesterdão, Países Baixos) um pedido de apreciação do referido mandado de detenção europeu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Ministério Público, Países Baixos)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Amesterdão, Países Baixos)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artigo 23.o da Overleveringswet (Lei Relativa à Entrega) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Ministério Público, Países Baixos)"->"apresentou no rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Amesterdão, Países Baixos) um pedido de apreciação do referido mandado de detenção europeu. 29/05/2019";
  "apresentou no rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Amesterdão, Países Baixos) um pedido de apreciação do referido mandado de detenção europeu. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Amesterdão, Países Baixos)";
  "apresentou no rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Amesterdão, Países Baixos) um pedido de apreciação do referido mandado de detenção europeu. 29/05/2019"->"artigo 23.o da Overleveringswet (Lei Relativa à Entrega) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

În ziua următoare, pe data de 29 mai 2019, Openbaar Ministerie (Ministerul Public, Țările de Jos) a sesizat rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunalul din Amsterdam, Țările de Jos) în temeiul articolului 23 din Overleveringswet (Legea privind predarea) din 29 aprilie 2004, pentru examinarea mandatului european de arestare sus‑menționat.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Ministerul Public, Țările de Jos)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunalul din Amsterdam, Țările de Jos)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "articolului 23 din Overleveringswet (Legea privind predarea) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (Ministerul Public, Țările de Jos)"->"a sesizat rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunalul din Amsterdam, Țările de Jos) în temeiul articolului 23 din Overleveringswet (Legea privind predarea) din 29 aprilie 2004, pentru examinarea mandatului european de arestare sus‑menționat. 29/05/2019";
  "a sesizat rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunalul din Amsterdam, Țările de Jos) în temeiul articolului 23 din Overleveringswet (Legea privind predarea) din 29 aprilie 2004, pentru examinarea mandatului european de arestare sus‑menționat. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunalul din Amsterdam, Țările de Jos)";
  "a sesizat rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunalul din Amsterdam, Țările de Jos) în temeiul articolului 23 din Overleveringswet (Legea privind predarea) din 29 aprilie 2004, pentru examinarea mandatului european de arestare sus‑menționat. 29/05/2019"->"articolului 23 din Overleveringswet (Legea privind predarea) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Nasledujúci deň, t. j. 29. mája 2019, Openbaar Ministerie (prokuratúra, Holandsko) na základe § 23 Overleveringswet (zákon o vydávaní osôb) z 29. apríla 2004 v znení uplatniteľnom na spor vo veci samej podal na Rechtbank Amsterdam (súd v Amsterdame, Holandsko) návrh na preskúmanie uvedeného európskeho zatykača.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie Openbaar Ministerie (prokuratúra, Holandsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (súd v Amsterdame, Holandsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "§ 23 Overleveringswet (zákon o vydávaní osôb) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie Openbaar Ministerie (prokuratúra, Holandsko)"->"podal na Rechtbank Amsterdam (súd v Amsterdame, Holandsko) návrh na preskúmanie uvedeného európskeho zatykača. 29/05/2019";
  "podal na Rechtbank Amsterdam (súd v Amsterdame, Holandsko) návrh na preskúmanie uvedeného európskeho zatykača. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (súd v Amsterdame, Holandsko)";
  "podal na Rechtbank Amsterdam (súd v Amsterdame, Holandsko) návrh na preskúmanie uvedeného európskeho zatykača. 29/05/2019"->"§ 23 Overleveringswet (zákon o vydávaní osôb) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Openbaar Ministerie (državno tožilstvo, Nizozemska) je naslednji dan, torej 29. maja 2019, na podlagi člena 23 Overleveringswet (zakon o predaji) z dne 29. aprila 2004 v različici, ki se uporablja v postopku v glavni stvari, pri rechtbank Amsterdam (prvostopenjsko sodišče v Amsterdamu, Nizozemska) začelo postopek za preizkus navedenega evropskega naloga za prijetje.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (državno tožilstvo, Nizozemska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (prvostopenjsko sodišče v Amsterdamu, Nizozemska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "člena 23 Overleveringswet (zakon o predaji) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (državno tožilstvo, Nizozemska)"->"začelo postopek za preizkus navedenega evropskega naloga za prijetje 29/05/2019";
  "začelo postopek za preizkus navedenega evropskega naloga za prijetje 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (prvostopenjsko sodišče v Amsterdamu, Nizozemska)";
  "začelo postopek za preizkus navedenega evropskega naloga za prijetje 29/05/2019"->"člena 23 Overleveringswet (zakon o predaji) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Openbaar Ministerie (syyttäjäviranomainen, Alankomaat) saattoi mainitun eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen seuraavana päivänä eli 29.5.2019 rechtbank Amsterdamin (Amsterdamin alioikeus, Alankomaat) tutkittavaksi 29.4.2004 annetun luovuttamislain (Overleveringswet), sellaisena kuin sitä sovelletaan pääasiassa, 23 §:n nojalla.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (syyttäjäviranomainen, Alankomaat)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdamin alioikeus, Alankomaat)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "23 §:n nojalla. 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie (syyttäjäviranomainen, Alankomaat)"->"saattoi mainitun eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen seuraavana päivänä tutkittavaksi 29/05/2019";
  "saattoi mainitun eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen seuraavana päivänä tutkittavaksi 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdamin alioikeus, Alankomaat)";
  "saattoi mainitun eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen seuraavana päivänä tutkittavaksi 29/05/2019"->"23 §:n nojalla. 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Dagen därpå, den 29 maj 2019, vände sig Openbaar Ministerie (åklagarmyndigheten, Nederländerna) med tillämpning av artikel 23 i Overleveringswet (lag om överlämnande) av den 29 april 2004, i den lydelse som är tillämplig i det nationella målet, till Rechtbank Amsterdam (Domstolen i Amsterdam, Nederländerna) för en prövning av nämnda europeiska arresteringsorder.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie Openbaar Ministerie (åklagarmyndigheten, Nederländerna)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Domstolen i Amsterdam, Nederländerna)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artikel 23 i Overleveringswet (lag om överlämnande) 29/04/2004"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Openbaar Ministerie Openbaar Ministerie (åklagarmyndigheten, Nederländerna)"->"vände sig Openbaar Ministerie (åklagarmyndigheten, Nederländerna) med tillämpning av artikel 23 i Overleveringswet (lag om överlämnande) av den 29 april 2004, i den lydelse som är tillämplig i det nationella målet, till Rechtbank Amsterdam (Domstolen i Amsterdam, Nederländerna) för en prövning av nämnda europeiska arresteringsorder. 29/05/2019";
  "vände sig Openbaar Ministerie (åklagarmyndigheten, Nederländerna) med tillämpning av artikel 23 i Overleveringswet (lag om överlämnande) av den 29 april 2004, i den lydelse som är tillämplig i det nationella målet, till Rechtbank Amsterdam (Domstolen i Amsterdam, Nederländerna) för en prövning av nämnda europeiska arresteringsorder. 29/05/2019"->"The Rechtbank Amsterdam (Domstolen i Amsterdam, Nederländerna)";
  "vände sig Openbaar Ministerie (åklagarmyndigheten, Nederländerna) med tillämpning av artikel 23 i Overleveringswet (lag om överlämnande) av den 29 april 2004, i den lydelse som är tillämplig i det nationella målet, till Rechtbank Amsterdam (Domstolen i Amsterdam, Nederländerna) för en prövning av nämnda europeiska arresteringsorder. 29/05/2019"->"artikel 23 i Overleveringswet (lag om överlämnande) 29/04/2004"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

In those circumstances, the Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court, Amsterdam) decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling:

‘Can a Public Prosecutor who participates in the administration of justice in the issuing Member State, who acts independently in the execution of those of his responsibilities which are inherent in the issuing of a European arrest warrant, and who has issued an European arrest warrant, be regarded as an issuing judicial authority within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision [2002/584] if a judge in the issuing Member State has assessed the conditions for issuing a European arrest warrant and, in particular, its proportionality, prior to the actual decision of that Public Prosecutor to issue the EAW?’

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court, Amsterdam, Netherlands)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "The Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court, Amsterdam, Netherlands)"->"Question to the Court for a preliminary ruling";
   "Question to the Court for a preliminary ruling"->"The Court";
   "Question to the Court for a preliminary ruling"->"Stay the proceedings";
   "Question to the Court for a preliminary ruling"->"Can a Public Prosecutor who participates in the administration of justice in the issuing Member State, who acts independently in the execution of those of his responsibilities which are inherent in the issuing of a European arrest warrant, and who has issued an European arrest warrant, be regarded as an issuing judicial authority within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision [2002/584] if a judge in the issuing Member State has assessed the conditions for issuing a European arrest warrant and, in particular, its proportionality, prior to the actual decision of that Public Prosecutor to issue the EAW?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

При тези условия Rechtbank Amsterdam (Първоинстанционен съд Амстердам, Нидерландия) решава да спре производството по делото и да постави на Съда следния преюдициален въпрос:

„Трябва ли прокурорът, който участва в правораздаването в издаващата държава членка, действа независимо при изпълнение на задълженията си, непосредствено свързани с издаването на европейска заповед за арест, и е издал такава заповед, да се смята за издаващ съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение [2002/584], ако преди фактическото му решение за издаване на ЕЗА предпоставките за това издаване, и по-специално неговият пропорционален характер, са били проверени от съд в издаващата държава членка?“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Първоинстанционен съд Амстердам"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam Първоинстанционен съд Амстердам, Нидерландия"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam Първоинстанционен съд Амстердам, Нидерландия"->"преюдициален въпрос";
  "преюдициален въпрос"->"Първоинстанционен съд Амстердам";
  "преюдициален въпрос"->"спре производството по делото";
  "Трябва ли прокурорът, който участва в правораздаването в издаващата държава членка, действа независимо при изпълнение на задълженията си, непосредствено свързани с издаването на европейска заповед за арест, и е издал такава заповед, да се смята за издаващ съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение [2002/584], ако преди фактическото му решение за издаване на ЕЗА предпоставките за това издаване, и по-специално неговият пропорционален характер, са били проверени от съд в издаващата държава членка?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Dadas estas circunstancias, el rechtbank Amsterdam (Tribunal de Primera Instancia de Ámsterdam) decidió suspender el procedimiento y plantear al Tribunal de Justicia la cuestión prejudicial siguiente:

«¿Puede ser considerado autoridad judicial emisora en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584 un fiscal que participa en la administración de justicia en el Estado miembro emisor, que actúa de forma independiente en el ejercicio de sus tareas inherentemente vinculadas a la emisión de una orden de detención europea y que ha emitido una orden de detención europea, si un órgano jurisdiccional del Estado miembro emisor ha examinado los requisitos de la emisión de una orden de detención europea y, en particular, la proporcionalidad de esta, con anterioridad a la decisión efectiva del Fiscal de dictar la orden de detención europea?»

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal de Justicia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam Tribunal de Primera Instancia de Ámsterdam"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam Tribunal de Primera Instancia de Ámsterdam"->"la cuestión prejudicial siguiente:";
  "la cuestión prejudicial siguiente:"->"Tribunal de Justicia";
  "la cuestión prejudicial siguiente:"->"suspender el procedimiento";
  "¿Puede ser considerado autoridad judicial emisora en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584 un fiscal que participa en la administración de justicia en el Estado miembro emisor, que actúa de forma independiente en el ejercicio de sus tareas inherentemente vinculadas a la emisión de una orden de detención europea y que ha emitido una orden de detención europea, si un órgano jurisdiccional del Estado miembro emisor ha examinado los requisitos de la emisión de una orden de detención europea y, en particular, la proporcionalidad de esta, con anterioridad a la decisión efectiva del Fiscal de dictar la orden de detención europea?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
XD.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(1) – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Criteria – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Case C-625/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

På denne baggrund har rechtbank Amsterdam (retten i første instans i Amsterdam) besluttet at udsætte sagen og forelægge Domstolen følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål:

»Kan en anklagemyndighed, som deltager i forvaltningen af retsplejen i den udstedende medlemsstat, som handler uafhængigt ved udøvelsen af sine opgaver i direkte forbindelse med udstedelsen af en europæisk arrestordre, og som har udstedt en europæisk arrestordre, anses for udstedende judiciel myndighed som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584/RIA, når en dommer i den udstedende medlemsstat har prøvet betingelserne for at udstede en europæisk arrestordre og navnlig dennes forholdsmæssighed forud for denne anklagemyndigheds faktiske afgørelse om at udstede den europæiske arrestordre?«

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Domstolen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam rechtbank Amsterdam (retten i første instans i Amsterdam)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Rechtbank Amsterdam rechtbank Amsterdam (retten i første instans i Amsterdam)"->"følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål";
  "følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål"->"Domstolen";
  "følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål"->"udsætte sagen";
  "Kan en anklagemyndighed, som deltager i forvaltningen af retsplejen i den udstedende medlemsstat, som handler uafhængigt ved udøvelsen af sine opgaver i direkte forbindelse med udstedelsen af en europæisk arrestordre, og som har udstedt en europæisk arrestordre, anses for udstedende judiciel myndighed som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584/RIA, når en dommer i den udstedende medlemsstat har prøvet betingelserne for at udstede en europæisk arrestordre og navnlig dennes forholdsmæssighed forud for denne anklagemyndigheds faktiske afgørelse om at udstede den europæiske arrestordre?"[dir=none];
    
}