mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 23 ottobre 2018, in applicazione dell’articolo 161, paragrafo 1, del regolamento di procedura, la vicepresidente della Corte ha deferito tale domanda alla Corte, che, alla luce della sua importanza, ne ha attribuito l’esame alla Grande Sezione, conformemente all’articolo 60, paragrafo 1, di detto regolamento.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la vicepresidente della Corte"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la Corte"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "articolo 60, paragrafo 1, di detto regolamento."[shape=trapezium];
  "articolo 161, paragrafo 1, del regolamento di procedura"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "la vicepresidente della Corte"->"domanda 23/10/2018";
  "domanda 23/10/2018"->"la Corte";
  "domanda 23/10/2018"->"articolo 60, paragrafo 1, di detto regolamento."[dir=none];
  "domanda 23/10/2018"->"articolo 161, paragrafo 1, del regolamento di procedura"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

2018. gada 23. oktobrī Tiesas priekšsēdētāja vietnieks saskaņā ar Reglamenta 161. panta 1. punktu nodeva Tiesai šo pieteikumu, un Tiesa, ņemot vērā minētā pieteikuma nozīmīgumu, saskaņā ar Reglamenta 60. panta 1. punktu tā izskatīšanu nodeva Virspalātai.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tiesas priekšsēdētāja vietnieks"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tiesa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Reglamenta 60. panta 1. punktu"[shape=trapezium];
  "Reglamenta 161. panta 1. punktu"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "Tiesas priekšsēdētāja vietnieks"->"šo pieteikumu 23/10/2018";
  "šo pieteikumu 23/10/2018"->"Tiesa";
  "šo pieteikumu 23/10/2018"->"Reglamenta 60. panta 1. punktu"[dir=none];
  "šo pieteikumu 23/10/2018"->"Reglamenta 161. panta 1. punktu"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2018 m. spalio 23 d. Teisingumo Teismo pirmininko pavaduotoja pagal Procedūros reglamento 161 straipsnio 1 dalį perdavė šį prašymą Teisingumo Teismui; šis, atsižvelgdamas į jo svarbą, paskyrė jį nagrinėti didžiajai kolegijai pagal šio reglamento 60 straipsnio 1 dalį.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Teisingumo Teismo pirmininko pavaduotoja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Teisingumo Teismui"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "šio reglamento 60 straipsnio 1 dalį"[shape=trapezium];
  "Procedūros reglamento 161 straipsnio 1 dalį"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "Teisingumo Teismo pirmininko pavaduotoja"->"šį prašymą 23/10/2018";
  "šį prašymą 23/10/2018"->"Teisingumo Teismui";
  "šį prašymą 23/10/2018"->"šio reglamento 60 straipsnio 1 dalį"[dir=none];
  "šį prašymą 23/10/2018"->"Procedūros reglamento 161 straipsnio 1 dalį"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2018. október 23‑án a Bíróság elnökhelyettese az eljárási szabályzat 161. cikkének (1) bekezdése alapján e kérelmet a Bíróság elé utalta, amely az említett kérelem jelentőségére tekintettel e szabályzat 60. cikke (1) bekezdésének megfelelően a nagytanács elé utalta azt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "a Bíróság elnökhelyettese"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Bíróság"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "a szabályzat 60. cikke (1) bekezdésének"[shape=trapezium];
  "az eljárási szabályzat 161. cikkének (1) bekezdése"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "a Bíróság elnökhelyettese"->"e kérelmet 23/10/2018";
  "e kérelmet 23/10/2018"->"Bíróság";
  "e kérelmet 23/10/2018"->"a szabályzat 60. cikke (1) bekezdésének"[dir=none];
  "e kérelmet 23/10/2018"->"az eljárási szabályzat 161. cikkének (1) bekezdése"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fit‑23 ta’ Ottubru 2018, skont l-Artikolu 161(1) tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura, il-Viċi President tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja rrefera din it-talba lill-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja, li, fid-dawl tal-importanza ta’ din it-talba, allokat it-trattament tagħha lill-Awla Manja konformement mal-Artikolu 60(1) ta’ dawn ir-regoli.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "il-Viċi President tal-Qorti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Qorti tal-Ġustizzja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l-Artikolu 60(1) ta’ dawn ir-regoli"[shape=trapezium];
  "l-Artikolu 161(1) tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "il-Viċi President tal-Qorti"->"din it-talba 23/10/2018";
  "din it-talba 23/10/2018"->"Qorti tal-Ġustizzja";
  "din it-talba 23/10/2018"->"l-Artikolu 60(1) ta’ dawn ir-regoli"[dir=none];
  "din it-talba 23/10/2018"->"l-Artikolu 161(1) tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 23 oktober 2018 heeft de vicepresident van het Hof het verzoek om voorlopige maatregelen overeenkomstig artikel 161, lid 1, van het Reglement voor de procesvoering verwezen naar het Hof, dat de behandeling van dit verzoek, gelet op het belang ervan, overeenkomstig artikel 60, lid 1, van dit Reglement heeft toegewezen aan de Grote kamer.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "de vicepresident van het Hof"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "het Hof"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artikel 60, lid 1, van dit Reglement"[shape=trapezium];
  "artikel 161, lid 1, van het Reglement voor de procesvoering"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "de vicepresident van het Hof"->"verzoek om voorlopige maatregelen 23/10/2018";
  "verzoek om voorlopige maatregelen 23/10/2018"->"het Hof";
  "verzoek om voorlopige maatregelen 23/10/2018"->"artikel 60, lid 1, van dit Reglement"[dir=none];
  "verzoek om voorlopige maatregelen 23/10/2018"->"artikel 161, lid 1, van het Reglement voor de procesvoering"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 23 października 2018 r. wiceprezes Trybunału, zgodnie z art. 161 § 1 regulaminu postępowania, przekazał wniosek o zastosowanie środków tymczasowych Trybunałowi, który zważywszy na jego doniosłość, przydzielił go wielkiej izbie, zgodnie z art. 60 § 1 regulaminu postępowania.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "wiceprezes Trybunału"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Trybunał"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "art. 60 § 1 regulaminu postępowania"[shape=trapezium];
  "art. 161 § 1 regulaminu postępowania"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "wiceprezes Trybunału"->"wniosek o zastosowanie środków tymczasowych 23/10/2018";
  "wniosek o zastosowanie środków tymczasowych 23/10/2018"->"Trybunał";
  "wniosek o zastosowanie środków tymczasowych 23/10/2018"->"art. 60 § 1 regulaminu postępowania"[dir=none];
  "wniosek o zastosowanie środków tymczasowych 23/10/2018"->"art. 161 § 1 regulaminu postępowania"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 23 de outubro de 2018, a vice‑presidente do Tribunal de Justiça, em aplicação do artigo 161.o, n.o 1, do Regulamento de Processo, submeteu esse pedido a decisão do Tribunal de Justiça que, atendendo à sua importância, o remeteu à Grande Secção, em conformidade com o artigo 60.o, n.o 1, deste regulamento.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "a vice‑presidente do Tribunal de Justiça"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "O Tribunal de Justiça"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artigo 60.o, n.o 1, deste regulamento."[shape=trapezium];
  "artigo 161.o, n.o 1, do Regulamento de Processo"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "a vice‑presidente do Tribunal de Justiça"->"aplicação do artigo 161.o, n.o 1, do Regulamento de Processo 23/10/2018";
  "aplicação do artigo 161.o, n.o 1, do Regulamento de Processo 23/10/2018"->"O Tribunal de Justiça";
  "aplicação do artigo 161.o, n.o 1, do Regulamento de Processo 23/10/2018"->"artigo 60.o, n.o 1, deste regulamento."[dir=none];
  "aplicação do artigo 161.o, n.o 1, do Regulamento de Processo 23/10/2018"->"artigo 161.o, n.o 1, do Regulamento de Processo"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 23 octombrie 2018, vicepreședinta Curții, în conformitate cu articolul 161 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul de procedură, a înaintat această cerere Curții, care, având în vedere importanța sa, a atribuit‑o pentru soluționare Marii Camere, în conformitate cu articolul 60 alineatul (1) din acest regulament.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "vicepreședinta Curții"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Curții"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "articolul 60 alineatul (1) din acest regulament"[shape=trapezium];
  "articolul 161 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul de procedură"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "vicepreședinta Curții"->"Cerere de măsuri provizorii 23/10/2018";
  "Cerere de măsuri provizorii 23/10/2018"->"Curții";
  "Cerere de măsuri provizorii 23/10/2018"->"articolul 60 alineatul (1) din acest regulament"[dir=none];
  "Cerere de măsuri provizorii 23/10/2018"->"articolul 161 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul de procedură"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 23. októbra 2018 podpredsedníčka Súdneho dvora v súlade s článkom 161 ods. 1 rokovacieho poriadku predložila tento návrh Súdnemu dvoru, ktorý ho vzhľadom na jeho význam pridelil veľkej komore v súlade s článkom 60 ods. 1 tohto rokovacieho poriadku.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "podpredsedníčka Súdneho dvora"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Súdny dvor"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "článkom 60 ods. 1 tohto rokovacieho poriadku."[shape=trapezium];
  "článkom 161 ods. 1 rokovacieho poriadku"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "podpredsedníčka Súdneho dvora"->"Návrh na vydanie predbežného opatrenia 23/10/2018";
  "Návrh na vydanie predbežného opatrenia 23/10/2018"->"Súdny dvor";
  "Návrh na vydanie predbežného opatrenia 23/10/2018"->"článkom 60 ods. 1 tohto rokovacieho poriadku."[dir=none];
  "Návrh na vydanie predbežného opatrenia 23/10/2018"->"článkom 161 ods. 1 rokovacieho poriadku"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Podpredsednica Sodišča je 23. oktobra 2018 na podlagi člena 161(1) Poslovnika ta predlog odstopila Sodišču, ki ga je ob upoštevanju njegove pomembnosti dodelilo velikemu senatu v skladu s členom 60(1) Poslovnika.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Podpredsednica Sodišča"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sodišča"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "členom 60(1) Poslovnika"[shape=trapezium];
  "člena 161(1) Poslovnika"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "Podpredsednica Sodišča"->"The text provided does not include a Slovenian translation for the phrase"Application for interim measures". 23/10/2018";
  "The text provided does not include a Slovenian translation for the phrase"Application for interim measures". 23/10/2018"->"Sodišča";
  "The text provided does not include a Slovenian translation for the phrase"Application for interim measures". 23/10/2018"->"členom 60(1) Poslovnika"[dir=none];
  "The text provided does not include a Slovenian translation for the phrase"Application for interim measures". 23/10/2018"->"člena 161(1) Poslovnika"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Unionin tuomioistuimen varapresidentti siirsi 23.10.2018 välitoimihakemuksen työjärjestyksen 161 artiklan 1 kohdan nojalla unionin tuomioistuimelle, joka ottaen huomioon mainitun hakemuksen merkityksen päätti työjärjestyksen 60 artiklan 1 kohdan nojalla antaa sen suuren jaoston käsiteltäväksi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Unionin tuomioistuimen varapresidentti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Unionin tuomioistuimelle"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "työjärjestyksen 60 artiklan 1 kohdan"[shape=trapezium];
  "työjärjestyksen 161 artiklan 1 kohdan"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "Unionin tuomioistuimen varapresidentti"->"välitoimihakemuksen 23/10/2018";
  "välitoimihakemuksen 23/10/2018"->"Unionin tuomioistuimelle";
  "välitoimihakemuksen 23/10/2018"->"työjärjestyksen 60 artiklan 1 kohdan"[dir=none];
  "välitoimihakemuksen 23/10/2018"->"työjärjestyksen 161 artiklan 1 kohdan"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Den 23 oktober 2018 beslutade domstolens vice ordförande, i enlighet med artikel 161.1 i rättegångsreglerna, att hänskjuta ansökan om interimistiska åtgärder till domstolen, vilken med hänsyn till ansökans betydelse hänsköt den till stora avdelningen i enlighet med artikel 60.1 i rättegångsreglerna.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "domstolens vice ordförande"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "domstolen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artikel 60.1 i rättegångsreglerna"[shape=trapezium];
  "artikel 161.1 i rättegångsreglerna"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "domstolens vice ordförande"->"ansökan om interimistiska åtgärder 23/10/2018";
  "ansökan om interimistiska åtgärder 23/10/2018"->"domstolen";
  "ansökan om interimistiska åtgärder 23/10/2018"->"artikel 60.1 i rättegångsreglerna"[dir=none];
  "ansökan om interimistiska åtgärder 23/10/2018"->"artikel 161.1 i rättegångsreglerna"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: English

By order of 17 December 2018, Commission v Poland (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), the Court granted the Commission’s application for interim measures until delivery of the final judgment in the present case.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Court of Justice"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Commission v Poland"[shape=doubleoctagon];

   "The Court of Justice"->"Order 17/12/2018";
   "Order 17/12/2018"->"Commission v Poland";
   "Order 17/12/2018"->"The Court granted the Commission’s application for interim measures until delivery of the final judgment in the present case."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

С определение от 17 декември 2018 г., Комисия/Полша (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), Съдът уважава изцяло молбата на Комисията за постановяване на временни мерки до произнасяне на решението по настоящото дело.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Съдът"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Комисия/Полша"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Съдът"->"с определение от 17 декември 2018 г.";
  "с определение от 17 декември 2018 г."->"Комисия/Полша";
  "с определение от 17 декември 2018 г."->"Съдът уважава изцяло молбата на Комисията за постановяване на временни мерки до произнасяне на решението по настоящото дело.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Mediante auto de 17 de diciembre de 2018, Comisión/Polonia (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), el Tribunal de Justicia estimó la demanda sobre medidas provisionales hasta que se dictara sentencia definitiva en el presente asunto.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "el Tribunal de Justicia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comisión/Polonia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "el Tribunal de Justicia"->"auto de 17 de diciembre de 2018";
  "auto de 17 de diciembre de 2018"->"Comisión/Polonia";
  "auto de 17 de diciembre de 2018"->"el Tribunal de Justicia estimó la demanda sobre medidas provisionales hasta que se dictara sentencia definitiva en el presente asunto.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Usnesením ze dne 17. prosince 2018, Komise v. Polsko (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), Soudní dvůr vyhověl návrhu Komise na nařízení předběžných opatření až do vyhlášení rozsudku, kterým bude ukončeno řízení v projednávané věci.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Soudní dvůr"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komise v. Polsko"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Soudní dvůr"->"Usnesením ze dne 17. prosince 2018";
  "Usnesením ze dne 17. prosince 2018"->"Komise v. Polsko";
  "Usnesením ze dne 17. prosince 2018"->"Soudní dvůr vyhověl návrhu Komise na nařízení předběžných opatření až do vyhlášení rozsudku, kterým bude ukončeno řízení v projednávané věci.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Ved kendelse af 17. december 2018, Kommissionen mod Polen (C-619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), tog Domstolen Kommissionens anmodning om foreløbige forholdsregler til følge indtil afsigelse af endelig dom i denne sag.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Domstolen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kommissionen mod Polen"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Domstolen"->"kendelse af 17. december 2018";
  "kendelse af 17. december 2018"->"Kommissionen mod Polen";
  "kendelse af 17. december 2018"->"Domstolen tog Kommissionens anmodning om foreløbige forholdsregler til følge indtil afsigelse af endelig dom i denne sag.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: German

Mit Beschluss vom 17. Dezember 2018, Kommission/Polen (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), hat der Gerichtshof dem Antrag der Kommission auf einstweilige Anordnungen bis zur Verkündung des die vorliegende Rechtssache beendenden Urteils stattgegeben.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "der Gerichtshof"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kommission/Polen"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "der Gerichtshof"->"Beschluss vom 17. Dezember 2018";
  "Beschluss vom 17. Dezember 2018"->"Kommission/Polen";
  "Beschluss vom 17. Dezember 2018"->"der Gerichtshof dem Antrag der Kommission auf einstweilige Anordnungen bis zur Verkündung des die vorliegende Rechtssache beendenden Urteils stattgegeben.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Euroopa Kohus rahuldas 17. detsembri 2018. aasta määrusega komisjon vs. Poola (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021) komisjoni ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise taotluse kuni selle kohtuotsuse kuulutamiseni, millega lõpetatakse menetlus käesolevas kohtuasjas.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Euroopa Kohus"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "komisjon vs. Poola"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Euroopa Kohus"->"17. detsembri 2018. aasta määrusega";
  "17. detsembri 2018. aasta määrusega"->"komisjon vs. Poola";
  "17. detsembri 2018. aasta määrusega"->"Euroopa Kohus rahuldas 17. detsembri 2018. aasta määrusega komisjon vs. Poola (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021) komisjoni ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise taotluse kuni selle kohtuotsuse kuulutamiseni, millega lõpetatakse menetlus käesolevas kohtuasjas.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Με διάταξη της 17ης Δεκεμβρίου 2018, Επιτροπή κατά Πολωνίας (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), το Δικαστήριο δέχθηκε την αίτηση λήψεως προσωρινών μέτρων που είχε υποβάλει η Επιτροπή, έως την έκδοση αποφάσεως που περατώνει την εκδίκαση της υπό κρίση υποθέσεως.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Δικαστήριο"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Επιτροπή κατά Πολωνίας"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Δικαστήριο"->"διάταξη της 17ης Δεκεμβρίου 2018";
  "διάταξη της 17ης Δεκεμβρίου 2018"->"Επιτροπή κατά Πολωνίας";
  "διάταξη της 17ης Δεκεμβρίου 2018"->"το Δικαστήριο δέχθηκε την αίτηση λήψεως προσωρινών μέτρων που είχε υποβάλει η Επιτροπή, έως την έκδοση αποφάσεως που περατώνει την εκδίκαση της υπό κρίση υποθέσεως.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: French

Par ordonnance du 17 décembre 2018, Commission/Pologne (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), la Cour a fait droit à la demande de mesures provisoires de la Commission, jusqu’au prononcé de l’arrêt mettant fin à la présente affaire.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la Cour"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Commission/Pologne"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "la Cour"->"ordonnance du 17 décembre 2018";
  "ordonnance du 17 décembre 2018"->"Commission/Pologne";
  "ordonnance du 17 décembre 2018"->"La Cour a fait droit à la demande de mesures provisoires de la Commission, jusqu’au prononcé de l’arrêt mettant fin à la présente affaire.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Rješenjem od 17. prosinca 2018., Komisija/Poljska (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), Sud je prihvatio Komisijin zahtjev za određivanje privremenih mjera do objave presude kojom se okončava ovaj postupak.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Sud"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisija/Poljska"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Sud"->"Rješenjem od 17. prosinca 2018.";
  "Rješenjem od 17. prosinca 2018."->"Komisija/Poljska";
  "Rješenjem od 17. prosinca 2018."->"Sud je prihvatio Komisijin zahtjev za određivanje privremenih mjera do objave presude kojom se okončava ovaj postupak.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Con ordinanza del 17 dicembre 2018, Commissione/Polonia (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), la Corte ha accolto in toto la domanda di provvedimenti provvisori della Commissione sino alla pronuncia della sentenza definitiva nella presente causa.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la Corte"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Commissione/Polonia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "la Corte"->"ordinanza del 17 dicembre 2018";
  "ordinanza del 17 dicembre 2018"->"Commissione/Polonia";
  "ordinanza del 17 dicembre 2018"->"la Corte ha accolto in toto la domanda di provvedimenti provvisori della Commissione sino alla pronuncia della sentenza definitiva nella presente causa.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Ar 2018. gada 17. decembra rīkojumu Komisija/Polija (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021) Tiesa pilnībā apmierināja Komisijas pieteikumu par pagaidu pasākumu noteikšanu līdz galīgā sprieduma pasludināšanai šajā lietā.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tiesa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisija/Polija"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Tiesa"->"2018. gada 17. decembra rīkojumu";
  "2018. gada 17. decembra rīkojumu"->"Komisija/Polija";
  "2018. gada 17. decembra rīkojumu"->"Tiesa pilnībā apmierināja Komisijas pieteikumu par pagaidu pasākumu noteikšanu līdz galīgā sprieduma pasludināšanai šajā lietā.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2018 m. gruodžio 17 d. Nutartimi Komisija / Lenkija (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021) Teisingumo Teismas patenkino Komisijos prašymą dėl laikinųjų apsaugos priemonių taikymo iki galutinio sprendimo priėmimo šioje byloje.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Teisingumo Teismas"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisija / Lenkija"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Teisingumo Teismas"->"2018 m. gruodžio 17 d. Nutartimi";
  "2018 m. gruodžio 17 d. Nutartimi"->"Komisija / Lenkija";
  "2018 m. gruodžio 17 d. Nutartimi"->"Teisingumo Teismas patenkino Komisijos prašymą dėl laikinųjų apsaugos priemonių taikymo iki galutinio sprendimo priėmimo šioje byloje.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

A 2018. december 17‑iBizottság kontra Lengyelország végzésben (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021) a Bíróság az ügy érdemében történő ítélethozatalig helyt adott a Bizottság ideiglenes intézkedés iránti kérelmének.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "a Bíróság"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Bizottság kontra Lengyelország"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "a Bíróság"->"2018. december 17-iBizottság kontra Lengyelország végzésben";
  "2018. december 17-iBizottság kontra Lengyelország végzésben"->"Bizottság kontra Lengyelország";
  "2018. december 17-iBizottság kontra Lengyelország végzésben"->"A Bíróság az ügy érdemében történő ítélethozatalig helyt adott a Bizottság ideiglenes intézkedés iránti kérelmének.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Permezz ta’ digriet tas‑17 ta’ Diċembru 2018, Il‑Kummissjoni vs Il‑Polonja (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja laqgħet it-talba għal miżuri provviżorji tal-Kummissjoni sakemm tingħata s-sentenza li tagħlaq din il-kawża.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Il‑Kummissjoni vs Il‑Polonja"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja"->"digriet tas‑17 ta’ Diċembru 2018";
  "digriet tas‑17 ta’ Diċembru 2018"->"Il‑Kummissjoni vs Il‑Polonja";
  "digriet tas‑17 ta’ Diċembru 2018"->"il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja laqgħet it-talba għal miżuri provviżorji tal-Kummissjoni sakemm tingħata s-sentenza li tagħlaq din il-kawża.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Bij beschikking van 17 december 2018, Commissie/Polen (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), heeft het Hof het verzoek om voorlopige maatregelen van de Commissie toegewezen totdat het arrest wordt gewezen waarbij in de onderhavige zaak een definitieve uitspraak wordt gedaan.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "het Hof"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Commissie/Polen"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "het Hof"->"beschikking van 17 december 2018";
  "beschikking van 17 december 2018"->"Commissie/Polen";
  "beschikking van 17 december 2018"->"heeft het Hof het verzoek om voorlopige maatregelen van de Commissie toegewezen totdat het arrest wordt gewezen waarbij in de onderhavige zaak een definitieve uitspraak wordt gedaan.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Postanowieniem z dnia 17 grudnia 2018 r., Komisja/Polska (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021) Trybunał przychylił się do wniosku Komisji o zastosowanie środków tymczasowych do czasu wydania ostatecznego wyroku w niniejszej sprawie.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Trybunał"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisja/Polska"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Trybunał"->"Postanowieniem z dnia 17 grudnia 2018 r.";
  "Postanowieniem z dnia 17 grudnia 2018 r."->"Komisja/Polska";
  "Postanowieniem z dnia 17 grudnia 2018 r."->"Trybunał przychylił się do wniosku Komisji o zastosowanie środków tymczasowych do czasu wydania ostatecznego wyroku w niniejszej sprawie.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Por Despacho de 17 de dezembro de 2018, Comissão/Polónia (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), o Tribunal de Justiça deferiu o pedido de medidas provisórias da Comissão até à prolação do acórdão que porá termo ao presente processo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "o Tribunal de Justiça"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comissão/Polónia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "o Tribunal de Justiça"->"Despacho de 17 de dezembro de 2018";
  "Despacho de 17 de dezembro de 2018"->"Comissão/Polónia";
  "Despacho de 17 de dezembro de 2018"->"O Tribunal de Justiça deferiu o pedido de medidas provisórias da Comissão até à prolação do acórdão que porá termo ao presente processo.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Prin Ordonanța din 17 decembrie 2018, Comisia/Polonia (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), Curtea a admis cererea de măsuri provizorii a Comisiei până la pronunțarea unei hotărâri definitive în prezenta cauză.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Curtea"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comisia/Polonia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Curtea"->"Ordonanța din 17 decembrie 2018";
  "Ordonanța din 17 decembrie 2018"->"Comisia/Polonia";
  "Ordonanța din 17 decembrie 2018"->"Curtea a admis cererea de măsuri provizorii a Comisiei până la pronunțarea unei hotărâri definitive în prezenta cauză.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Uznesením zo 17. decembra 2018, Komisia/Poľsko (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), Súdny dvor vyhovel návrhu Komisie na nariadenie predbežných opatrení až do vyhlásenia rozsudku, ktorým bude rozhodnuté vo veci samej.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Súdny dvor"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisia/Poľsko"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Súdny dvor"->"Uznesením zo 17. decembra 2018";
  "Uznesením zo 17. decembra 2018"->"Komisia/Poľsko";
  "Uznesením zo 17. decembra 2018"->"Súdny dvor vyhovel návrhu Komisie na nariadenie predbežných opatrení až do vyhlásenia rozsudku, ktorým bude rozhodnuté vo veci samej.."[dir=none];
    
}