mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

F’dawn iċ-ċirkustanzi, il-Cour d’Appel (il-Qorti tal-Appell) iddeċidiet li tissospendi l-proċeduri quddiemha u li tagħmel lill-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja d-domanda preliminari li ġejja:

“Il-Prosekutur Pubbliku Franċiż fil-qorti istruttorja jew fil-qorti li għandha tagħti deċiżjoni, li huwa kompetenti fi Franza taħt id-dritt ta’ dan l-Istat, għall-ħruġ ta’ mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew, jista’ jiġi kkunsidrat li huwa awtorità ġudizzjarja emittenti, fis-sens awtonomu msemmi fl-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas [2002/584], f’ċirkustanzi fejn, filwaqt li jivverifika l-osservanza tal-kundizzjonijiet neċessarji għall-ħruġ ta’ mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew u jeżamina n-natura proporzjonata tiegħu fid-dawl tal-fatti tal-fajl kriminali, huwa fl-istess ħin l-awtorità responsabbli għat-tressiq ta’ proċeduri kriminali fl-istess kawża?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Cour d’appel Qorti tal-Appell"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Cour d’appel Qorti tal-Appell"->"d-domanda preliminari";
  "d-domanda preliminari"->"Court";
  "Cour d’appel Qorti tal-Appell"->"tissospendi l-proċeduri";
  "Il-Prosekutur Pubbliku Franċiż fil-qorti istruttorja jew fil-qorti li għandha tagħti deċiżjoni, li huwa kompetenti fi Franza taħt id-dritt ta’ dan l-Istat, għall-ħruġ ta’ mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew, jista’ jiġi kkunsidrat li huwa awtorità ġudizzjarja emittenti, fis-sens awtonomu msemmi fl-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas [2002/584], f’ċirkustanzi fejn, filwaqt li jivverifika l-osservanza tal-kundizzjonijiet neċessarji għall-ħruġ ta’ mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew u jeżamina n-natura proporzjonata tiegħu fid-dawl tal-fatti tal-fajl kriminali, huwa fl-istess ħin l-awtorità responsabbli għat-tressiq ta’ proċeduri kriminali fl-istess kawża?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Daarop heeft de Cour d’appel de behandeling van de zaak geschorst en het Hof verzocht om een prejudiciële beslissing over de volgende vraag:

„Kan het Franse openbaar ministerie bij de onderzoeks- of vonnisrechter, dat in Frankrijk krachtens het recht van die staat bevoegd is om een Europees aanhoudingsbevel uit te vaardigen, worden beschouwd als een uitvaardigende rechterlijke autoriteit in de autonome betekenis bedoeld in artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit [2002/584], wanneer deze autoriteit, die de naleving van de voor de uitvaardiging van een Europees aanhoudingsbevel noodzakelijke voorwaarden dient te controleren en de evenredigheid ervan aan de omstandigheden van de strafzaak dient te toetsen, tegelijkertijd in dezelfde zaak de met de strafvervolging belaste instantie is?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Cour d’appel Cour d’appel"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Cour d’appel Cour d’appel"->"prejudiciële beslissing";
  "prejudiciële beslissing"->"Court";
  "Cour d’appel Cour d’appel"->"de behandeling van de zaak geschorst";
  "Kan het Franse openbaar ministerie bij de onderzoeks- of vonnisrechter, dat in Frankrijk krachtens het recht van die staat bevoegd is om een Europees aanhoudingsbevel uit te vaardigen, worden beschouwd als een uitvaardigende rechterlijke autoriteit in de autonome betekenis bedoeld in artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit [2002/584], wanneer deze autoriteit, die de naleving van de voor de uitvaardiging van een Europees aanhoudingsbevel noodzakelijke voorwaarden dient te controleren en de evenredigheid ervan aan de omstandigheden van de strafzaak dient te toetsen, tegelijkertijd in dezelfde zaak de met de strafvervolging belaste instantie is?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

W tych okolicznościach Cour d’appel (sąd apelacyjny) postanowił zawiesić postępowanie i skierować do Trybunału następujące pytanie prejudycjalne:

„Czy francuska prokuratura przy sądzie śledczym lub orzekającym, właściwa we Francji na podstawie prawa tego państwa do wydania europejskiego nakazu aresztowania, może być uznana za wydający nakaz organ sądowy zgodnie z autonomicznym znaczeniem wynikającym z art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej [2002/584], w sytuacji gdy będąc uznana za właściwą do kontroli, czy spełnione są przesłanki wymagane do wydania europejskiego nakazu aresztowania, oraz właściwą do zbadania, czy jest ono proporcjonalne z uwagi na okoliczności wynikające z akt postępowania karnego, stanowi ona jednocześnie organ właściwy do prowadzenia postępowania karnego w tej samej sprawie?”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Cour d’appel sąd apelacyjny"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Cour d’appel sąd apelacyjny"->"pytanie prejudycjalne";
  "pytanie prejudycjalne"->"Court";
  "Cour d’appel sąd apelacyjny"->"zawiesić postępowanie";
  "Czy francuska prokuratura przy sądzie śledczym lub orzekającym, właściwa we Francji na podstawie prawa tego państwa do wydania europejskiego nakazu aresztowania, może być uznana za wydający nakaz organ sądowy zgodnie z autonomicznym znaczeniem wynikającym z art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej [2002/584], w sytuacji gdy będąc uznana za właściwą do kontroli, czy spełnione są przesłanki wymagane do wydania europejskiego nakazu aresztowania, oraz właściwą do zbadania, czy jest ono proporcjonalne z uwagi na okoliczności wynikające z akt postępowania karnego, stanowi ona jednocześnie organ właściwy do prowadzenia postępowania karnego w tej samej sprawie?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Neste contexto, a Cour d’appel (Tribunal de Recurso) decidiu suspender a instância e submeter ao Tribunal de Justiça a seguinte questão prejudicial:

«Pode o Ministério Público francês junto do tribunal de instrução ou de julgamento, competente para a emissão de um mandado de detenção europeu ao abrigo do direito francês, ser considerado uma autoridade judiciária de emissão, na aceção autónoma referida no artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro [2002/584], no caso em que, além de dever verificar o cumprimento dos requisitos necessários para a emissão de um [mandado de detenção europeu] e examinar a sua proporcionalidade à luz das circunstâncias do processo penal, seja simultaneamente a autoridade responsável pela ação penal no mesmo processo?»

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Cour d’appel Tribunal de Recurso"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Cour d’appel Tribunal de Recurso"->"questão prejudicial";
  "questão prejudicial"->"Court";
  "Cour d’appel Tribunal de Recurso"->"suspender a instância";
  "Pode o Ministério Público francês junto do tribunal de instrução ou de julgamento, competente para a emissão de um mandado de detenção europeu ao abrigo do direito francês, ser considerado uma autoridade judiciária de emissão, na aceção autónoma referida no artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro [2002/584], no caso em que, além de dever verificar o cumprimento dos requisitos necessários para a emissão de um [mandado de detenção europeu] e examinar a sua proporcionalidade à luz das circunstâncias do processo penal, seja simultaneamente a autoridade responsável pela ação penal no mesmo processo?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

În aceste condiții, Cour d’appel (Curtea de Apel) a hotărât să suspende judecarea cauzei și să adreseze Curții următoarea întrebare preliminară:

„Ministerul Public francez de pe lângă instanța de instrucție sau de judecată, care are competența în Franța să emită un mandat de arestare european în temeiul dreptului acestui stat, poate fi considerat o autoritate judiciară emitentă, în sensul autonom vizat la articolul 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru [2002/584], în ipoteza în care acesta trebuie să verifice respectarea condițiilor necesare pentru emiterea unui mandat european de arestare și să analizeze proporționalitatea acestuia având în vedere circumstanțele dosarului de urmărire penală, fiind în același timp autoritatea responsabilă cu efectuarea urmăririi penale în aceeași cauză?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Cour d’appel Curtea de Apel"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Cour d’appel Curtea de Apel"->"următoarea întrebare preliminară:";
  "următoarea întrebare preliminară:"->"Court";
  "Cour d’appel Curtea de Apel"->"să suspende judecarea cauzei";
  "Ministerul Public francez de pe lângă instanța de instrucție sau de judecată, care are competența în Franța să emită un mandat de arestare european în temeiul dreptului acestui stat, poate fi considerat o autoritate judiciară emitentă, în sensul autonom vizat la articolul 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru [2002/584], în ipoteza în care acesta trebuie să verifice respectarea condițiilor necesare pentru emiterea unui mandat european de arestare și să analizeze proporționalitatea acestuia având în vedere circumstanțele dosarului de urmărire penală, fiind în același timp autoritatea responsabilă cu efectuarea urmăririi penale în aceeași cauză?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Za týchto okolností Cour d’appel (Odvolací súd) rozhodol prerušiť konanie a položiť Súdnemu dvoru túto prejudiciálnu otázku:

„Je možné francúzsku prokuratúru pri súde vykonávajúcom vyšetrovanie alebo rozhodujúcom vo veci, ktorá má vo Francúzsku na základe práva tohto štátu právomoc na vydávanie európskych zatykačov, považovať za súdny orgán vydávajúci zatykač v autonómnom zmysle podľa článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia [2002/584], pokiaľ má za úlohu kontrolovať dodržiavanie podmienok nevyhnutných na vydanie európskeho zatykača a skúmať jeho primeranosť vo vzťahu k okolnostiam trestnej veci a zároveň je orgánom činným v trestnom konaní v tej istej veci?“

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Cour d’appel Odvolací súd"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Cour d’appel Odvolací súd"->"prejudiciálnu otázku";
  "prejudiciálnu otázku"->"Court";
  "Cour d’appel Odvolací súd"->"prerušiť konanie";
  "Je možné francúzsku prokuratúru pri súde vykonávajúcom vyšetrovanie alebo rozhodujúcom vo veci, ktorá má vo Francúzsku na základe práva tohto štátu právomoc na vydávanie európskych zatykačov, považovať za súdny orgán vydávajúci zatykač v autonómnom zmysle podľa článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia [2002/584], pokiaľ má za úlohu kontrolovať dodržiavanie podmienok nevyhnutných na vydanie európskeho zatykača a skúmať jeho primeranosť vo vzťahu k okolnostiam trestnej veci a zároveň je orgánom činným v trestnom konaní v tej istej veci?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Tässä tilanteessa Cour d’appel päätti lykätä asian käsittelyä ja esittää unionin tuomioistuimelle seuraavan ennakkoratkaisukysymyksen:

”Voidaanko Ranskan virallista syyttäjää, joka toimii tutkinnasta tai tuomion antamisesta vastaavassa tuomioistuimessa ja joka on Ranskan lain nojalla kyseisessä valtiossa toimivaltainen antamaan eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen, pitää – – puitepäätöksen [2002/584] 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitetussa itsenäisessä merkityksessä pidätysmääräyksen antaneena oikeusviranomaisena siinä tapauksessa, että vaikka hänen edellytetään valvovan eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen antamisen välttämättömien edellytysten noudattamista ja tutkivan sen oikeasuhteisuuden rikosasiaan liittyvät olosuhteet huomioon ottaen, hän on samaan aikaan syytteen nostamisesta vastaava viranomainen samassa asiassa?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Cour d’appel Cour d’appel"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Cour d’appel Cour d’appel"->"Ennakkoratkaisukysymyksen";
  "Ennakkoratkaisukysymyksen"->"Court";
  "Cour d’appel Cour d’appel"->"lykätä asian käsittelyä";
  "Voidaanko Ranskan virallista syyttäjää, joka toimii tutkinnasta tai tuomion antamisesta vastaavassa tuomioistuimessa ja joka on Ranskan lain nojalla kyseisessä valtiossa toimivaltainen antamaan eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen, pitää – – puitepäätöksen [2002/584] 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitetussa itsenäisessä merkityksessä pidätysmääräyksen antaneena oikeusviranomaisena siinä tapauksessa, että vaikka hänen edellytetään valvovan eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen antamisen välttämättömien edellytysten noudattamista ja tutkivan sen oikeasuhteisuuden rikosasiaan liittyvät olosuhteet huomioon ottaen, hän on samaan aikaan syytteen nostamisesta vastaava viranomainen samassa asiassa?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Mot denna bakgrund beslutade Cour d’appel (Appellationsdomstolen) att vilandeförklara målet och ställa följande fråga till EU-domstolen:

”Kan den allmänna franska åklagarmyndigheten vid en förundersökningsdomstol eller en dömande domstol, som enligt medlemsstatens rätt är behörig i Frankrike att utfärda en europeisk arresteringsorder, betraktas som en utfärdande rättslig myndighet, i den självständiga betydelse som avses i artikel 6.1 i rambeslut nr 2002/584, för det fall den allmänna åklagarmyndigheten, som ska kontrollera att erforderliga villkor för att utfärda en europeisk arresteringsorder är uppfyllda och pröva om utfärdandet är proportionerlig mot bakgrund av handlingarna i det straffrättsliga ärendet, samtidigt ansvarar för lagföring i samma ärende?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Cour d’appel (Appellationsdomstolen)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Cour d’appel (Appellationsdomstolen)"->"följande fråga till EU-domstolen";
  "följande fråga till EU-domstolen"->"Court";
  "Cour d’appel (Appellationsdomstolen)"->"vilandeförklara målet";
  "Kan den allmänna franska åklagarmyndigheten vid en förundersökningsdomstol eller en dömande domstol, som enligt medlemsstatens rätt är behörig i Frankrike att utfärda en europeisk arresteringsorder, betraktas som en utfärdande rättslig myndighet, i den självständiga betydelse som avses i artikel 6.1 i rambeslut nr 2002/584, för det fall den allmänna åklagarmyndigheten, som ska kontrollera att erforderliga villkor för att utfärda en europeisk arresteringsorder är uppfyllda och pröva om utfärdandet är proportionerlig mot bakgrund av handlingarna i det straffrättsliga ärendet, samtidigt ansvarar för lagföring i samma ärende?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

On 27 March 2019, the public prosecutor at the tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Regional Court, Tours) issued a European arrest warrant in connection with criminal proceedings in respect of YC, suspected of having participated in an armed robbery in France.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The public prosecutor at the tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Regional Court, Tours)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "European arrest warrant"[shape=trapezium];
    
   "The public prosecutor at the tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Regional Court, Tours)"->"European arrest warrant"[label="Issue 27/03/2019"];
   "European arrest warrant"->"Criminal proceedings in respect of YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 27 март 2019 г. прокурорът на Републиката към Tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Окръжен съд Тур, Франция) издава европейска заповед за арест за целите на наказателното преследване срещу YC, заподозрян, че е участвал във въоръжено нападение във Франция.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "прокурорът на Републиката към tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Окръжен съд Тур, Франция)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "европейска заповед за арест"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "прокурорът на Републиката към tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Окръжен съд Тур, Франция)"->"европейска заповед за арест"[label="издава 27/03/2019"];
  "европейска заповед за арест"->"наказателното преследване срещу YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 27 de marzo de 2019, el fiscal del tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Tribunal de Primera Instancia de Tours) emitió una orden de detención europea para el ejercicio de acciones penales contra YC, sospechoso de haber participado en Francia en un atraco a mano armada.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "el fiscal del tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours el tribunal de grande instance de Tours"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "orden de detención europea"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "el fiscal del tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours el tribunal de grande instance de Tours"->"orden de detención europea"[label="emitió una orden 27/03/2019"];
  "orden de detención europea"->"acciones penales contra YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dne 27. března 2019 vydal státní zástupce při tribunal de grande instance de Tours (soud prvního stupně v Tours, Francie) evropský zatýkací rozkaz za účelem trestního stíhání zahájeného proti YC podezřelému z účasti na ozbrojené loupeži ve Francii.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "státní zástupce při tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours soud prvního stupně v Tours, Francie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "evropský zatýkací rozkaz"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "státní zástupce při tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours soud prvního stupně v Tours, Francie"->"evropský zatýkací rozkaz"[label="vydal 27/03/2019"];
  "evropský zatýkací rozkaz"->"trestního stíhání zahájeného proti YC YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den 27. marts 2019 udstedte den offentlige anklager ved tribunal de grande instance de Tours (retten i første instans i Tours, Frankrig) en europæisk arrestordre med henblik på retsforfølgning indledt mod YC, som mistænkes for at have deltaget i et væbnet angreb i Frankrig.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours retten i første instans i Tours"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europæisk arrestordre"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours retten i første instans i Tours"->"europæisk arrestordre"[label="udstedte 27/03/2019"];
  "europæisk arrestordre"->"retsforfølgning indledt mod YC YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

Am 27. März 2019 erließ der Procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Leiter der Staatsanwaltschaft beim Regionalgericht Tours, Frankreich) einen Europäischen Haftbefehl zur Strafverfolgung von YC, der verdächtigt wurde, in Frankreich an einem bewaffneten Überfall beteiligt gewesen zu sein.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Leiter der Staatsanwaltschaft beim Regionalgericht Tours, Frankreich tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Regionalgericht Tours, Frankreich)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europäischen Haftbefehl"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Leiter der Staatsanwaltschaft beim Regionalgericht Tours, Frankreich tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Regionalgericht Tours, Frankreich)"->"Europäischen Haftbefehl"[label="erließ 27/03/2019"];
  "Europäischen Haftbefehl"->"Strafverfolgung von YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

27. märtsil 2019 tegi Tribunal de grande instance de Toursi (Toursi esimese astme kohus) juures tegutsev vabariigi prokurör Euroopa vahistamismääruse kriminaalmenetluse algatamiseks YC vastu, keda kahtlustati Prantsusmaal relvastatud röövis.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal de grande instance de Toursi (Toursi esimese astme kohus) juures tegutsev vabariigi prokurör tribunal de grande instance de Tours Tribunal de grande instance de Toursi (Toursi esimese astme kohus)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Tribunal de grande instance de Toursi (Toursi esimese astme kohus) juures tegutsev vabariigi prokurör tribunal de grande instance de Tours Tribunal de grande instance de Toursi (Toursi esimese astme kohus)"->"Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[label="algatamiseks 27/03/2019"];
  "Euroopa vahistamismääruse"->"kriminaalmenetluse algatamiseks YC vastu YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 27 Μαρτίου 2019, ο procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours (εισαγγελέας πλημμελειοδικών Tours, Γαλλία) εξέδωσε ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως στο πλαίσιο ποινικής διώξεως κατά του YC, υπόπτου για συμμετοχή σε ένοπλη ληστεία στη Γαλλία.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "εισαγγελέας πλημμελειοδικών Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours (εισαγγελέας πλημμελειοδικών Tours, Γαλλία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "εισαγγελέας πλημμελειοδικών Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours (εισαγγελέας πλημμελειοδικών Tours, Γαλλία)"->"ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως"[label="εξέδωσε 27/03/2019"];
  "ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως"->"ποινικής διώξεως κατά του YC YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

Le 27 mars 2019, le procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours a émis un mandat d’arrêt européen aux fins de poursuites pénales engagées à l’encontre de YC, soupçonné d’avoir participé en France à une attaque à main armée.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "le procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "le procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours"->"mandat d’arrêt européen"[label="a émis un mandat d’arrêt européen 27/03/2019"];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"->"poursuites pénales engagées à l’encontre de YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Državni odvjetnik pri tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Okružni sudu u Toursu) 27. ožujka 2019. protiv osobe YC, osumnjičene za sudjelovanje u kaznenom djelu razbojništva u Francuskoj izdao je europski uhidbeni nalog radi kaznenog progona.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Državni odvjetnik pri tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Okružni sudu u Toursu) tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Okružni sudu u Toursu)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europski uhidbeni nalog"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Državni odvjetnik pri tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Okružni sudu u Toursu) tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Okružni sudu u Toursu)"->"europski uhidbeni nalog"[label="izdao je 27/03/2019"];
  "europski uhidbeni nalog"->"sudjelovanje u kaznenom djelu razbojništva u Francuskoj YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 27 marzo 2019 il procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours (procuratore della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di primo grado di Tours) ha emesso un mandato d’arresto europeo ai fini dell’esercizio di un’azione penale promossa nei confronti di YC, sospettato di aver partecipato in Francia a un attacco a mano armata.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "procuratore della Repubblica presso il tribunal de grande instance de Tours Tribunale di primo grado di Tours"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "procuratore della Repubblica presso il tribunal de grande instance de Tours Tribunale di primo grado di Tours"->"mandato d’arresto europeo"[label="ha emesso 27/03/2019"];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"->"un’azione penale promossa nei confronti di YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

2019. gada 27. martāprocureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours izdeva Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi, lai veiktu kriminālvajāšanu pret YC, kurš tiek turēts aizdomās par piedalīšanos bruņotā uzbrukumā Francijā.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours"->"Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi"[label="izdeva 27/03/2019"];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi"->"kriminālvajāšanu pret YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2019 m. kovo 27 d. Respublikos prokuroras prie Tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Tūro apygardos teismas, Prancūzija) išdavė Europos arešto orderį, kad būtų vykdomas YC, įtariamo Prancūzijoje dalyvavus ginkluotame užpuolime, baudžiamasis persekiojimas.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Respublikos prokuroras prie Tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Tūro apygardos teismas, Prancūzija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europos arešto orderis"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Respublikos prokuroras prie Tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Tūro apygardos teismas, Prancūzija)"->"Europos arešto orderis"[label="išdavė 27/03/2019"];
  "Europos arešto orderis"->"baudžiamasis persekiojimas YC YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2019. március 27‑én a tribunal de grande instance de Tours (tours‑i általános hatáskörű elsőfokú bíróság, Franciaország) mellett működő államügyész európai elfogatóparancsot bocsátott ki YC ellen büntetőeljárás lefolytatása céljából, akit azzal gyanúsítanak, hogy Franciaországban részt vett egy fegyveres rablásban.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "az államügyész tribunal de grande instance de Tours tours‑i általános hatáskörű elsőfokú bíróság"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európai elfogatóparancsot"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "az államügyész tribunal de grande instance de Tours tours‑i általános hatáskörű elsőfokú bíróság"->"európai elfogatóparancsot"[label="bocsátott ki 27/03/2019"];
  "európai elfogatóparancsot"->"büntetőeljárás lefolytatása céljából YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fis‑27 ta’ Marzu 2019, il-Prosekutur tar-Repubblika fi ħdan it-tribunal de grande instance de Tours (il-Qorti Reġjonali ta’ Tours, Franza) ħareġ mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew għall-finijiet ta’ proċeduri kriminali mibdija kontra YC, issuspettat li kien ipparteċipa f’serqa bil-vjolenza fi Franza.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "il-Prosekutur tar-Repubblika tribunal de grande instance de Tours (il-Qorti Reġjonali ta’ Tours, Franza)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "il-Prosekutur tar-Repubblika tribunal de grande instance de Tours (il-Qorti Reġjonali ta’ Tours, Franza)"->"mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[label="ipparteċipa f’serqa bil-vjolenza fi Franza 27/03/2019"];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"->"proċeduri kriminali mibdija kontra YC YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 27 maart 2019 heeft de officier van justitie bij de tribunal de grande instance de Tours (rechter in eerste aanleg Tours, Frankrijk) een Europees aanhoudingsbevel uitgevaardigd met het oog op strafvervolging tegen YC, die ervan wordt verdacht in Frankrijk te hebben deelgenomen aan een gewapende overval.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "officier van justitie bij de tribunal de grande instance de Tours rechter in eerste aanleg Tours"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "officier van justitie bij de tribunal de grande instance de Tours rechter in eerste aanleg Tours"->"Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[label="uitgevaardigd 27/03/2019"];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"->"strafvervolging tegen YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 27 marca 2019 r. procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours (prokurator Republiki przy sądzie pierwszej instancji w Tours) wydał europejski nakaz aresztowania w celu przeprowadzenia postępowania karnego wszczętego przeciwko YC, podejrzanemu o udział w rozboju we Francji.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "prokurator Republiki przy sądzie pierwszej instancji w Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours sądzie pierwszej instancji w Tours"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europejski nakaz aresztowania"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "prokurator Republiki przy sądzie pierwszej instancji w Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours sądzie pierwszej instancji w Tours"->"europejski nakaz aresztowania"[label="wydał 27/03/2019"];
  "europejski nakaz aresztowania"->"postępowania karnego wszczętego przeciwko YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 27 de março de 2019, o procurador da República junto do tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Tours) emitiu um mandado de detenção europeu para efeitos de procedimento penal contra YC, suspeito de ter participado num ataque à mão armada em França.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "o procurador da República junto do tribunal tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Tours)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "o procurador da República junto do tribunal tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Tours)"->"mandado de detenção europeu"[label="emitiu 27/03/2019"];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"->"procedimento penal contra YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La data de 27 martie 2019, procurorul Republicii de pe lângă tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Tribunalul de Mare Instanță din Tours) a emis un mandat european de arestare pentru efectuarea urmăririi penale inițiate împotriva lui YC, bănuit că a participat în Franța la un atac armat.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "procurorul Republicii de pe lângă tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Tribunalul de Mare Instanță din Tours)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat european de arestare"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "procurorul Republicii de pe lângă tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Tribunalul de Mare Instanță din Tours)"->"mandat european de arestare"[label="a emis 27/03/2019"];
  "mandat european de arestare"->"urmăririi penale inițiate împotriva lui YC"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 27. marca 2019 prokurátor republiky pri Tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Prvostupňový súd Tours, Francúzsko) vydal európsky zatykač na účely trestného stíhania začatého proti YC, ktorý je vo Francúzsku podozrivý z účasti na ozbrojenom útoku.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "prokurátor republiky pri Tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Prvostupňový súd Tours, Francúzsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európsky zatykač"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "prokurátor republiky pri Tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Tours (Prvostupňový súd Tours, Francúzsko)"->"európsky zatykač"[label="vydal 27/03/2019"];
  "európsky zatykač"->"trestného stíhania začatého proti YC YC"[dir=none];
    
}