mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: English

On 19 December 2017, a petition for judicial review was lodged in the Court of Session (Scotland, United Kingdom), in which the petitioners in the main proceedings — including one member of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, two members of the Scottish Parliament, and three members of the European Parliament — seek a declarator specifying whether, when and how that notification can unilaterally be revoked. Those petitioners, in support of whom two other Members of the United Kingdom Parliament intervened, wish to know whether the notification referred to in Article 50 TEU can unilaterally be revoked before the expiry of the two-year period laid down in that article, with the effect that, if the notification made by the United Kingdom were revoked, that Member State would remain in the European Union. They asked the Court of Session (Scotland) to refer a question on that issue to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling. In response, the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union argued that the question was hypothetical and academic, in view of the United Kingdom Government’s stated position that the notification would not be revoked.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "Court of Session (Scotland, United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Member of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, two members of the Scottish Parliament, and three members of the European Parliament."[shape=doubleoctagon];


   "Member of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, two members of the Scottish Parliament, and three members of the European Parliament."->"Loged 19/12/2017";
   "Loged 19/12/2017"->"Court of Session (Scotland, United Kingdom)";
   "Loged 19/12/2017"->"Whether the notification referred to in Article 50 TEU can unilaterally be revoked before the expiry of the two-year period."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Bulgarian

На 19 декември 2017 г. по реда за упражняване на съдебен контрол върху действията на администрацията („judicial review“) жалбоподателите, които включват един член на Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (парламент на Обединено кралство Великобритания и Северна Ирландия, наричан по-нататък „парламентът на Обединеното кралство“), двама членове на Scottish Parliament (парламент на Шотландия, Обединеното кралство) и трима членове на Европейския парламент, подават до Court of Session (Scotland) (Висш граждански съд, Шотландия, Обединеното кралство) искане за постановяване на установително решение („declarator“), с което да се определи дали, кога и как може едностранно да бъде оттеглена посочената нотификация. Жалбоподателите, подпомагани от още двама встъпили по делото членове на парламента на Обединеното кралство, искат да се установи дали нотификацията по член 50 ДЕС може да се оттегли едностранно преди изтичането на двугодишния срок по този член и дали като последица от оттеглянето на направената от Обединеното кралство нотификация тази държава членка би останала в Съюза. Те подават искане пред Court of Session (Scotland) (Висш граждански съд, Шотландия) да отправи преюдициално запитване до Съда по този въпрос. Ответникът — държавният секретар за излизането от Европейския съюз, поддържа, че въпросът е хипотетичен и академичен, тъй като позицията на правителството на Обединеното кралство е, че нотификацията няма да бъде оттеглена.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Обединеното кралство)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "член на Parliament of the Обединеното кралство of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, двама членове на Scottish Parliament (парламент на Шотландия, Обединеното кралство) и трима членове на Европейския парламент."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "член на Parliament of the Обединеното кралство of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, двама членове на Scottish Parliament (парламент на Шотландия, Обединеното кралство) и трима членове на Европейския парламент."->"19 декември 2017 г.";
  "19 декември 2017 г."->"Court of Session (Scotland, Обединеното кралство)";
  "19 декември 2017 г."->"дали нотификацията по член 50 ДЕС може да се оттегли едностранно преди изтичането на двугодишния срок по този член."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Czech

Dne 19. prosince 2017 navrhovatelé v původním řízení – mezi které patří jeden člen Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Parlament Spojeného království Velké Británie a Severního Irska, dále jen „Parlament Spojeného království“), dva členové Scottish Parliament (Skotský parlament, Spojené království) a tři členové Evropského parlamentu – podali ke Court of Session (Scotland) (Vrchní soud pro Skotsko, Spojené království) návrh na soudní přezkum (judicial review) směřující k vydání deklaratorního rozsudku (declarator), jímž se domáhali upřesnění, zda, kdy a jak lze uvedené oznámení jednostranně odvolat. Tito navrhovatelé, na jejichž podporu vstoupili do řízení jako vedlejší účastníci dva další členové Parlamentu Spojeného království, se tážou, zda lze oznámení podle článku 50 SEU jednostranně odvolat před uplynutím lhůty dvou let stanovené v tomto článku s tím důsledkem, že kdyby bylo oznámení učiněné Spojeným královstvím odvoláno, setrval by tento členský stát v Unii. Court of Session (Scotland) (Vrchní soud pro Skotsko) navrhli, aby v tomto ohledu položil Soudnímu dvoru předběžnou otázku. Státní tajemník pro vystoupení z Evropské unie v odpovědi na tento návrh namítl, že tato otázka je vzhledem k postoji zastávanému vládou Spojeného království, totiž že oznámení nebude odvoláno, hypotetická a akademická.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Spojeného království)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "člen Parliament of the Spojeného království of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, dva členové Scottish Parliament (Skotský parlament, Spojené království) a tři členové Evropského parlamentu."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "člen Parliament of the Spojeného království of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, dva členové Scottish Parliament (Skotský parlament, Spojené království) a tři členové Evropského parlamentu."->"Dne 19. prosince 2017";
  "Dne 19. prosince 2017"->"Court of Session (Scotland, Spojeného království)";
  "Dne 19. prosince 2017"->"Zda lze oznámení podle článku 50 SEU jednostranně odvolat před uplynutím lhůty dvou let.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Danish

Den 19. december 2017 indledte sagsøgerne i hovedsagen, som indbefatter et medlem af Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Det Forenede Kongerige Storbritannien og Nordirlands parlament, herefter »Det Forenede Kongeriges parlament«), to medlemmer af Scottish Parliament (det skotske parlament, Det Forenede Kongerige) og tre medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet, et søgsmål med henblik på domstolsprøvelse (judicial review) ved Court of Session (Scotland) (øverste domstol i civile sager (Skotland), Det Forenede Kongerige) for at opnå en konstaterende kendelse (declarator), hvorved det præciseres, om, hvornår og hvordan den nævnte meddelelse kan tilbagekaldes ensidigt. Disse sagsøgere, til støtte for hvem yderligere to medlemmer af Det Forenede Kongeriges parlament er indtrådt i sagen, ønsker oplyst, om den i artikel 50 TEU omhandlede meddelelse kan tilbagekaldes ensidigt før udløbet af fristen på to år i henhold til denne artikel med den virkning, at Det Forenede Kongerige, hvis denne medlemsstats meddelelse blev trukket tilbage, ville forblive i Unionen. De har anmodet Court of Session (Scotland) (øverste domstol i civile sager (Skotland)) om at forelægge Domstolen et spørgsmål herom til præjudiciel afgørelse. Heroverfor har ministeren for udtræden af Den Europæiske Union gjort gældende, at spørgsmålet er hypotetisk og akademisk, henset til, at det er Det Forenede Kongeriges regerings standpunkt, at meddelelsen ikke vil blive tilbagekaldt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Det Forenede Kongerige)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "medlem af Parliament of the Det Forenede Kongerige of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, to medlemmer af Scottish Parliament (det skotske parlament, Det Forenede Kongerige) og tre medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "medlem af Parliament of the Det Forenede Kongerige of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, to medlemmer af Scottish Parliament (det skotske parlament, Det Forenede Kongerige) og tre medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet."->"Den 19. december 2017";
  "Den 19. december 2017"->"Court of Session (Scotland, Det Forenede Kongerige)";
  "Den 19. december 2017"->"om den i artikel 50 TEU omhandlede meddelelse kan tilbagekaldes ensidigt før udløbet af fristen på to år."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: German

Am 19. Dezember 2017 stellten die Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens, zu denen ein Mitglied des Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Parlament des Vereinigten Königreichs Großbritannien und Nordirland, im Folgenden: Parlament des Vereinigten Königreichs), zwei Mitglieder des Scottish Parliament (Schottisches Parlament, Vereinigtes Königreich) und drei Mitglieder des Europäischen Parlaments gehören, beim Court of Session (Scotland) (Oberstes Gericht [Schottland], Vereinigtes Königreich) einen Antrag auf gerichtliche Überprüfung (judicial review), mit dem sie die Feststellung (declarator) begehren, ob, wann und wie die genannte Mitteilung einseitig zurückgenommen werden kann. Die Kläger, zu deren Unterstützung zwei weitere Mitglieder des Parlaments des Vereinigten Königreichs dem Rechtsstreit beigetreten sind, möchten wissen, ob die in Art. 50 EUV vorgesehene Mitteilung vor Ablauf des dort genannten Zweijahreszeitraums einseitig zurückgenommen werden kann, mit der Folge, dass das Vereinigte Königreich bei einer Rücknahme seiner Mitteilung in der Europäischen Union verbliebe. Sie forderten den Court of Session (Scotland) (Oberstes Gericht [Schottland]) auf, dem Gerichtshof hierzu eine Frage zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen. Der Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union hielt dem entgegen, dass die Frage angesichts des Standpunkts der Regierung des Vereinigten Königreichs, dass es keine Rücknahme der Mitteilung geben werde, hypothetisch und akademisch sei.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Vereinigtes Königreich)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Mitglied des Parliament of the Vereinigtes Königreich of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, zwei Mitglieder des Scottish Parliament (Schottisches Parlament, Vereinigtes Königreich) und drei Mitglieder des Europäischen Parlaments."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Mitglied des Parliament of the Vereinigtes Königreich of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, zwei Mitglieder des Scottish Parliament (Schottisches Parlament, Vereinigtes Königreich) und drei Mitglieder des Europäischen Parlaments."->"Am 19. Dezember 2017";
  "Am 19. Dezember 2017"->"Court of Session (Scotland, Vereinigtes Königreich)";
  "Am 19. Dezember 2017"->"ob die in Art. 50 EUV vorgesehene Mitteilung vor Ablauf des dort genannten Zweijahreszeitraums einseitig zurückgenommen werden kann."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Estonian

Põhikohtuasja avaldajad, kelle hulgas on üks Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Irelandi (Suurbritannia ja Põhja-Iiri Ühendkuningriigi parlament, edaspidi „Ühendkuningriigi parlament“) liige, kaks Scottish Parliamenti (Šoti parlament, Ühendkuningriik) liiget ja kolm Euroopa Parlamendi liiget, esitasid 19. detsembril 2017 Court of Sessionile (Scotland) (kõrge tsiviilkohus (Šotimaa), Ühendkuningriik) kohtuliku kontrolli avalduse (judicial review) tuvastusotsuse (declarator) tegemise nõudes, et kohus täpsustaks, kas, millal ja kuidas on võimalik kõnealust teadet ühepoolselt tagasi võtta. Avaldajad, kelle toetuseks astusid menetlusse veel kaks Ühendkuningriigi parlamendi liiget, soovivad teada saada, kas ELL artiklis 50 sätestatud teate võib enne selles artiklis ette nähtud kaheaastase perioodi möödumist ühepoolselt tagasi võtta, nii et juhul, kui Ühendkuningriigi esitatud teade tagasi võetaks, jääks see liikmesriik liitu. Nad palusid Court of Sessionil (Scotland) (kõrge tsiviilkohus (Šotimaa)) esitada selle kohta eelotsuse küsimus Euroopa Kohtule. Euroopa Liidust väljaastumise eest vastutav riigisekretär väitis vastu, et küsimus on hüpoteetiline ja akadeemiline, arvestades Ühendkuningriigi valitsuse seisukohta, et teadet ei võeta tagasi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Ühendkuningriik)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Irelandi (Suurbritannia ja Põhja-Iiri Ühendkuningriigi parlament, edaspidi „Ühendkuningriigi parlament“) liige, kaks Scottish Parliamenti (Šoti parlament, Ühendkuningriik) liiget ja kolm Euroopa Parlamendi liiget Parliament of the Ühendkuningriik of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, kaks Scottish Parliamenti (Šoti parlament, Ühendkuningriik) liiget ja kolm Euroopa Parlamendi liiget."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Irelandi (Suurbritannia ja Põhja-Iiri Ühendkuningriigi parlament, edaspidi „Ühendkuningriigi parlament“) liige, kaks Scottish Parliamenti (Šoti parlament, Ühendkuningriik) liiget ja kolm Euroopa Parlamendi liiget Parliament of the Ühendkuningriik of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, kaks Scottish Parliamenti (Šoti parlament, Ühendkuningriik) liiget ja kolm Euroopa Parlamendi liiget."->"esitasid 19. detsembril 2017";
  "esitasid 19. detsembril 2017"->"Court of Session (Scotland, Ühendkuningriik)";
  "esitasid 19. detsembril 2017"->"kas ELL artiklis 50 sätestatud teate võib enne selles artiklis ette nähtud kaheaastase perioodi möödumist ühepoolselt tagasi võtta."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Greek

Στις 19 Δεκεμβρίου 2017 οι εκκαλούντες της κύριας δίκης, μεταξύ των οποίων ένα μέλος του Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Κοινοβουλίου του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου της Μεγάλης Βρετανίας και της Βόρειας Ιρλανδίας, στο εξής: Κοινοβούλιο του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου), δύο μέλη του Scottish Parliament (Κοινοβουλίου της Σκωτίας, Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο) και τρία μέλη του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου, άσκησαν ενώπιον του Court of Session (Scotland) [ανώτερου δικαστηρίου (Σκωτία), Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο] προσφυγή για δικαστικό έλεγχο της νομιμότητας (judicial review), με αίτημα την έκδοση αναγνωριστικής απόφασης (declarator), προκειμένου να αποσαφηνιστεί αν, πότε και πώς θα μπορούσε να ανακληθεί μονομερώς η ως άνω γνωστοποίηση. Οι εκκαλούντες της κύριας δίκης, υπέρ των οποίων παρενέβησαν δύο ακόμη μέλη του Κοινοβουλίου του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου, ζητούν να διευκρινιστεί αν η γνωστοποίηση στην οποία αναφέρεται το άρθρο 50 ΣΕΕ μπορεί να ανακληθεί μονομερώς πριν από την παρέλευση της διετούς προθεσμίας που προβλέπεται στο άρθρο αυτό, ούτως ώστε, εφόσον η γνωστοποίηση εκ μέρους του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου ανακληθεί, να παραμείνει το εν λόγω κράτος μέλος στην Ένωση. Ζήτησαν δε από το Court of Session (Scotland) [ανώτερο δικαστήριο (Σκωτία)] να απευθύνει στο Δικαστήριο προδικαστικό ερώτημα επί του συγκεκριμένου ζητήματος. Προς αντίκρουσή τους, ο αρμόδιος Υπουργός για την αποχώρηση από την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση ισχυρίστηκε ότι το ερώτημα ήταν απλώς υποθετικό και θεωρητικό, δεδομένης της θέσης που έλαβε η Κυβέρνηση του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου ότι η γνωστοποίηση δεν πρόκειται να ανακληθεί.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Μέλος του Parliament of the Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, δύο μέλη του Scottish Parliament (Κοινοβουλίου της Σκωτίας, Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο) και τρία μέλη του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Μέλος του Parliament of the Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, δύο μέλη του Scottish Parliament (Κοινοβουλίου της Σκωτίας, Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο) και τρία μέλη του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου."->"Στις 19 Δεκεμβρίου 2017";
  "Στις 19 Δεκεμβρίου 2017"->"Court of Session (Scotland, Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου)";
  "Στις 19 Δεκεμβρίου 2017"->"Ζητούν να διευκρινιστεί αν η γνωστοποίηση στην οποία αναφέρεται το άρθρο 50 ΣΕΕ μπορεί να ανακληθεί μονομερώς πριν από την παρέλευση της διετούς προθεσμίας που προβλέπεται στο άρθρο αυτό."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: French

Le 19 décembre 2017, un recours en contrôle juridictionnel (judicial review) visant à obtenir un jugement déclaratoire (declarator) a été formé devant la Court of Session (Scotland) [cour de session (Écosse), Royaume-Uni] par les requérants au principal, au nombre desquels figurent un membre du Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Parlement du Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord, ci-après le « Parlement du Royaume-Uni »), deux membres du Scottish Parliament (Parlement écossais, Royaume‑Uni) et trois membres du Parlement européen, afin de voir préciser si, quand et comment ladite notification pouvait être unilatéralement révoquée. Ces requérants, au soutien desquels sont intervenus deux autres membres du Parlement du Royaume-Uni, souhaitent savoir si la notification visée à l’article 50 TUE peut être unilatéralement révoquée avant l’expiration de la période de deux ans prévue à cet article avec pour effet que, si la notification effectuée par le Royaume-Uni était révoquée, cet État membre resterait dans l’Union. Ils ont invité la Court of Session (Scotland) [cour de session (Écosse)] à adresser à la Cour une question préjudicielle sur ce point. En défense, le secrétaire d’État chargé du retrait de l’Union européenne a fait valoir que la question était hypothétique et académique, compte tenu de la prise de position du gouvernement du Royaume-Uni selon laquelle la notification ne serait pas révoquée.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Royaume-Uni)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Parlement du Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord Parliament of the Royaume-Uni of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, deux membres du Parlement écossais, Royaume‑Uni et trois membres du Parlement européen."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Parlement du Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord Parliament of the Royaume-Uni of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, deux membres du Parlement écossais, Royaume‑Uni et trois membres du Parlement européen."->"Le 19 décembre 2017";
  "Le 19 décembre 2017"->"Court of Session (Scotland, Royaume-Uni)";
  "Le 19 décembre 2017"->"si la notification visée à l’article 50 TUE peut être unilatéralement révoquée avant l’expiration de la période de deux ans."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Croatian

Tužitelji 19. prosinca 2017. u glavnom postupku, među kojima su jedan zastupnik u Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Parlament Ujedinjene Kraljevine Velike Britanije i Sjeverne Irske, u daljnjem tekstu: parlament Ujedinjene Kraljevine), dva zastupnika u Scottish Parliament (škotski parlament, Ujedinjena Kraljevina) i tri zastupnika u Europskom parlamentu, podnijeli su Court of Session (Scotland) (Vrhovni građanski sud, Škotska, Ujedinjena Kraljevina) zahtjev za preispitivanje zakonitosti (judicial review) radi donošenja deklaratorne presude (declarator) kojom bi se pojasnilo može li se, kada i kako navedena obavijest jednostrano opozvati. Ti tužitelji, u čiju su potporu intervenirala druga dvojica zastupnika u parlamentu Ujedinjene Kraljevine, žele znati može li se obavijest iz članka 50. UEU‑s jednostrano opozvati prije isteka roka od dvije godine propisanog tim člankom, a što bi imalo za učinak to da bi Ujedinjena Kraljevina, ako opozove dostavljenu obavijest, ostala u Uniji. Zatražili su od Court of Session (Scotland) (Vrhovni građanski sud, Škotska) da u vezi s time uputi Sudu prethodno pitanje. Državni tajnik za izlazak iz Europske unije u odgovoru je istaknuo da je pitanje hipotetsko i teoretsko, s obzirom na to da je vlada Ujedinjene Kraljevine izrazila stajalište da neće opozvati obavijest.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Ujedinjena Kraljevina)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Parlament Ujedinjene Kraljevine Velike Britanije i Sjeverne Irske, u daljnjem tekstu: parlament Ujedinjene Kraljevine) Parliament of the Ujedinjena Kraljevina of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, dva zastupnika u Scottish Parliament (škotski parlament, Ujedinjena Kraljevina) i tri zastupnika u Europskom parlamentu."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Parlament Ujedinjene Kraljevine Velike Britanije i Sjeverne Irske, u daljnjem tekstu: parlament Ujedinjene Kraljevine) Parliament of the Ujedinjena Kraljevina of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, dva zastupnika u Scottish Parliament (škotski parlament, Ujedinjena Kraljevina) i tri zastupnika u Europskom parlamentu."->"Tužitelji 19. prosinca 2017.";
  "Tužitelji 19. prosinca 2017."->"Court of Session (Scotland, Ujedinjena Kraljevina)";
  "Tužitelji 19. prosinca 2017."->"može li se obavijest iz članka 50. UEU‑s jednostrano opozvati prije isteka roka od dvije godine propisanog tim člankom."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Italian

Il 19 dicembre 2017 è stato presentato alla Court of Session [Corte per le cause civili (Scozia), Regno Unito], da parte dei ricorrenti nel procedimento principale, tra i quali figurano un membro del Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Parlamento del Regno Unito di Gran Bretagna e Irlanda del Nord; in prosieguo: il «Parlamento del Regno Unito»), due membri dello Scottish Parliament (Parlamento scozzese, Regno Unito) e tre membri del Parlamento europeo, un ricorso giurisdizionale (judicial review) diretto a ottenere una sentenza declaratoria (declarator) con cui si precisi se, quando e come detta notifica possa essere unilateralmente revocata. Tali ricorrenti, a sostegno dei quali sono intervenuti altri due membri del Parlamento del Regno Unito, chiedono se la notifica di cui all’articolo 50 TUE possa essere unilateralmente revocata prima della scadenza del periodo di due anni previsto in detta disposizione con la conseguenza che, laddove la notifica effettuata dal Regno Unito fosse revocata, tale Stato membro rimarrebbe nell’Unione. Essi hanno invitato la Court of Session (Scotland) [Corte per le cause civili (Scozia)] a sottoporre alla Corte una questione pregiudiziale al riguardo. Nel controricorso, il Ministro per l’uscita dall’Unione europea ha sostenuto che la questione era ipotetica e accademica, alla luce del fatto che la posizione dichiarata del governo del Regno Unito era che la notifica non sarebbe stata revocata.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Regno Unito)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "membro del Parliament of the Regno Unito of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, due membri dello Scottish Parliament (Parlamento scozzese, Regno Unito) e tre membri del Parlamento europeo."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "membro del Parliament of the Regno Unito of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, due membri dello Scottish Parliament (Parlamento scozzese, Regno Unito) e tre membri del Parlamento europeo."->"Il 19 dicembre 2017";
  "Il 19 dicembre 2017"->"Court of Session (Scotland, Regno Unito)";
  "Il 19 dicembre 2017"->"Se la notifica di cui all’articolo 50 TUE possa essere unilateralmente revocata prima della scadenza del periodo di due anni."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Lithuanian

2017 m. gruodžio 19 d. ieškovai pagrindinėje byloje, tarp kurių yra vienas Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Jungtinės Didžiosios Britanijos ir Šiaurės Airijos Karalystės parlamentas, toliau – Jungtinės Karalystės parlamentas) narys, du Scottish Parliament (Škotijos parlamentas, Jungtinė Karalystė) nariai ir trys Europos Parlamento nariai, pateikė Court of Session (Scotland) (Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Škotija)) ieškinį dėl teisminės peržiūros (judicial review), kad būtų priimtas sprendimas dėl pripažinimo (declarator), ar, kada ir kaip galima vienašališkai atšaukti minėtą pranešimą. Šie ieškovai, kurių palaikyti į bylą įstojo kiti du Jungtinės Karalystės parlamento nariai, siekia išsiaiškinti, ar ESS 50 straipsnyje nurodytą pranešimą galima vienašališkai atšaukti prieš pasibaigiant šiame straipsnyje numatytam dvejų metų terminui, todėl, jei Jungtinės Karalystės pateiktas pranešimas būtų atšauktas, ši valstybė narė liktų Sąjungoje. Jie paragino Court of Session (Scotland) (Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Škotija)) kreiptis į Teisingumo Teismą su prašymu priimti prejudicinį sprendimą šiuo klausimu. Atsikirsdamas išstojimo iš Europos Sąjungos reikalų valstybės sekretorius tvirtino, kad klausimas yra hipotetinis ir teorinis, atsižvelgiant į Jungtinės Karalystės vyriausybės pareikštą poziciją, kad šis pranešimas nebus atšauktas.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Jungtinė Karalystė)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Jungtinės Didžiosios Britanijos ir Šiaurės Airijos Karalystės parlamentas, toliau – Jungtinės Karalystės parlamentas) narys Parliament of the Jungtinė Karalystė of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, du Scottish Parliament (Škotijos parlamentas, Jungtinė Karalystė) nariai ir trys Europos Parlamento nariai."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Jungtinės Didžiosios Britanijos ir Šiaurės Airijos Karalystės parlamentas, toliau – Jungtinės Karalystės parlamentas) narys Parliament of the Jungtinė Karalystė of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, du Scottish Parliament (Škotijos parlamentas, Jungtinė Karalystė) nariai ir trys Europos Parlamento nariai."->"2017 m. gruodžio 19 d.";
  "2017 m. gruodžio 19 d."->"Court of Session (Scotland, Jungtinė Karalystė)";
  "2017 m. gruodžio 19 d."->"Ar ESS 50 straipsnyje nurodytą pranešimą galima vienašališkai atšaukti prieš pasibaigiant šiame straipsnyje numatytam dvejų metų terminui.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Maltese

Fid-19 ta’ Diċembru 2017, rikors għal stħarriġ ġudizzjarju (“judicial review”) intiż sabiex tinkiseb sentenza dikjaratorja (“declarator”) ġie ppreżentat quddiem il-Court of Session (Scotland) (il-Qorti Suprema Ċivili, l-Iskozja, ir-Renju Unit) mir-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali, li jinkludu Membru tal-Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (il-Parlament tar-Renju Unit tal-Gran Brittanja u tal-Irlanda ta’ Fuq, iktar ’il quddiem il-“Parlament tar-Renju Unit”), żewġ Membri tal-iScottish Parliament (il-Parlament Skoċċiż, ir-Renju Unit) u tliet Membri tal-Parlament Ewropew, bil-għan li jiġi speċifikat jekk, meta u kif l-imsemmija notifika setgħet tiġi rrevokata unilateralment. Dawn ir-rikorrenti, li insostenn tagħhom intervenew żewġ Membri oħra tal-Parlament tar-Renju Unit, xtaqu jkunu jafu jekk in-notifika prevista fl-Artikolu 50 TUE tistax tiġi rrevokata unilateralment qabel l-iskadenza tal-perijodu ta’ sentejn previst f’dan l-artikolu bil-konsegwenza li, fil-każ li n-notifika mwettqa mir-Renju Unit tiġi rrevokata, dan l-Istat Membru jibqa’ fl-Unjoni. Huma stiednu lill-Court of Session (Scotland) (il-Qorti Suprema Ċivili, l-Iskozja) tagħmel lill-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja domanda preliminari dwar dan il-punt. Fid-difiża tiegħu, is-Segretarju tal-Istat għall-Ħruġ mill-Unjoni Ewropea sostna li d-domanda kienet ipotetika u akkademika fid-dawl tal-pożizzjoni meħuda mill-Gvern tar-Renju Unit li n-notifika ma kinitx ser tiġi rrevokata.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Renju Unit)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Membru tal-Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Parliament of the Renju Unit of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, żewġ Membri tal-iScottish Parliament (il-Parlament Skoċċiż, ir-Renju Unit) u tliet Membri tal-Parlament Ewropew."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Membru tal-Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Parliament of the Renju Unit of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, żewġ Membri tal-iScottish Parliament (il-Parlament Skoċċiż, ir-Renju Unit) u tliet Membri tal-Parlament Ewropew."->"Fid-19 ta’ Diċembru 2017";
  "Fid-19 ta’ Diċembru 2017"->"Court of Session (Scotland, Renju Unit)";
  "Fid-19 ta’ Diċembru 2017"->"Jekk in-notifika prevista fl-Artikolu 50 TUE tistax tiġi rrevokata unilateralment qabel l-iskadenza tal-perijodu ta’ sentejn.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Dutch

Op 19 december 2017 dienden verzoekers in het hoofdgeding, onder wie een lid van het parlement van het Verenigd Koninkrijk van Groot-Brittannië en Noord-Ierland, twee leden van het Schotse parlement en drie leden van het Europees Parlement, bij de Court of Session (Scotland) (hoogste rechter van Schotland, Verenigd Koninkrijk) een verzoek tot rechterlijke toetsing (judicial review) ter verkrijging van een declaratoir vonnis (declarator) in, met als doel te vernemen of, wanneer en hoe die kennisgeving eenzijdig kan worden ingetrokken. Verzoekers, aan wier zijde twee andere leden van het parlement van het Verenigd Koninkrijk hebben geïntervenieerd, willen weten of de kennisgeving als bedoeld in artikel 50 VEU eenzijdig kan worden herroepen voordat de in dat artikel gestelde termijn van twee jaar is verstreken, zodat het Verenigd Koninkrijk, als de door deze lidstaat gedane kennisgeving wordt herroepen, in de Unie blijft. Zij hebben de Court of Session (Scotland) verzocht om het Hof hierover een prejudiciële vraag te stellen. De minister die verantwoordelijk is voor de terugtrekking uit de Europese Unie, stelde daartegenover dat de vraag hypothetisch en academisch was, gelet op het standpunt van de regering van het Verenigd Koninkrijk dat de kennisgeving niet zou worden ingetrokken.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Verenigd Koninkrijk)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "lid van het parlement Parliament of the Verenigd Koninkrijk of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, twee leden van het Schotse parlement en drie leden van het Europees Parlement."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "lid van het parlement Parliament of the Verenigd Koninkrijk of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, twee leden van het Schotse parlement en drie leden van het Europees Parlement."->"Op 19 december 2017";
  "Op 19 december 2017"->"Court of Session (Scotland, Verenigd Koninkrijk)";
  "Op 19 december 2017"->"Of de kennisgeving als bedoeld in artikel 50 VEU eenzijdig kan worden herroepen voordat de in dat artikel gestelde termijn van twee jaar is verstreken.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Polish

W dniu 19 grudnia 2017 r. powodowie w postępowaniu głównym, wśród nich członek Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (parlamentu Zjednoczonego Królestwa Wielkiej Brytanii i Irlandii Północnej, zwanego dalej „parlamentem Zjednoczonego Królestwa”), dwoje członków Scottish Parliament (parlamentu szkockiego, Zjednoczone Królestwo) oraz troje członków Parlamentu Europejskiego wnieśli do Court of Session (Scotland) [naczelnego sądu cywilnego (Szkocja) (Zjednoczone Królestwo)] powództwo w trybie kontroli sądowej („judicial review”) w celu uzyskania wyroku ustalającego („declarator”). Powodowie ci, po których stronie przystąpiło do sporu dwóch innych członków parlamentu Zjednoczonego Królestwa, chcieli ustalić, czy notyfikacja, o której mowa w art. 50 TUE, może zostać jednostronnie wycofana przed upływem przewidzianego w tym artykule okresu dwóch lat z takim skutkiem, że jeżeli notyfikacja dokonana przez Zjednoczone Królestwo zostałaby wycofana, rzeczone państwo członkowskie pozostałoby w Unii. Zwrócili się oni do Court of Session (Scotland) [naczelnego sądu cywilnego (Szkocja)] z wnioskiem, by sąd ten skierował do Trybunału pytanie prejudycjalne w tej kwestii. Minister ds. wyjścia z Unii Europejskiej podnosił w odpowiedzi, że w świetle stanowiska rządu Zjednoczonego Królestwa, zgodnie z którym notyfikacja nie zostanie wycofana, pytanie to jest natury hipotetycznej i akademickiej.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Zjednoczone Królestwo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "członek Parliament of the Zjednoczone Królestwo of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, dwoje członków Scottish Parliament (parlamentu szkockiego, Zjednoczone Królestwo) oraz troje członków Parlamentu Europejskiego."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "członek Parliament of the Zjednoczone Królestwo of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, dwoje członków Scottish Parliament (parlamentu szkockiego, Zjednoczone Królestwo) oraz troje członków Parlamentu Europejskiego."->"19 grudnia 2017 r.";
  "19 grudnia 2017 r."->"Court of Session (Scotland, Zjednoczone Królestwo)";
  "19 grudnia 2017 r."->"czy notyfikacja, o której mowa w art. 50 TUE, może zostać jednostronnie wycofana przed upływem przewidzianego w tym artykule okresu dwóch lat."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Portuguese

Em 19 de dezembro de 2017, os recorrentes no processo principal, entre os quais figuram um membro do Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Parlamento do Reino Unido da Grã‑Bretanha e da Irlanda do Norte, a seguir «Parlamento do Reino Unido»), dois membros do Scottish Parliament (Parlamento escocês, Reino Unido) e três membros do Parlamento Europeu, interpuseram na Court of Session (Scotland) [Tribunal de Sessão (Escócia) Reino Unido] um recurso de fiscalização jurisdicional da legalidade (judicial review) com vista à prolação de uma sentença declarativa (declarator) que esclarecesse se, quando e como essa notificação podia ser unilateralmente revogada. Esses recorrentes, em apoio dos quais intervieram dois outros membros do Parlamento do Reino Unido, pretendem saber se a notificação a que se refere o artigo 50.o TUE pode ser unilateralmente revogada antes do termo do período de dois anos previsto nesse artigo, com o efeito de, se a notificação efetuada pelo Reino Unido for revogada, esse Estado‑Membro permanecer na União. Convidaram a Court of Session (Scotland) [Tribunal de Sessão (Escócia)] a submeter ao Tribunal de Justiça uma questão prejudicial sobre este problema. Contestando, o secretário de Estado encarregado da retirada da União Europeia alegou que a questão era hipotética e académica, tendo em conta a posição do Governo do Reino Unido de que a notificação não seria revogada.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Reino Unido)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Parlamento do Reino Unido Parliament of the Reino Unido of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, , dois membros do Scottish Parliament (Parlamento escocês, Reino Unido) e três membros do Parlamento Europeu."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Parlamento do Reino Unido Parliament of the Reino Unido of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, , dois membros do Scottish Parliament (Parlamento escocês, Reino Unido) e três membros do Parlamento Europeu."->"Em 19 de dezembro de 2017";
  "Em 19 de dezembro de 2017"->"Court of Session (Scotland, Reino Unido)";
  "Em 19 de dezembro de 2017"->"Se a notificação a que se refere o artigo 50.o TUE pode ser unilateralmente revogada antes do termo do período de dois anos.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Romanian

La 19 decembrie 2017, o acțiune în control jurisdicțional (judicial review) prin care se urmărea obținerea unei hotărâri declaratorii (declarator) a fost introdusă la Court of Session (Scotland) [Curtea Supremă Civilă (Scoția), Regatul Unit] de reclamanții din litigiul principal, printre care se numără un membru al Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Parlamentul Regatului Unit al Marii Britanii și Irlandei de Nord, denumit în continuare „Parlamentul Regatului Unit”), doi membri ai Scottish Parliament (Parlamentul Scoțian, Regatul Unit) și trei membri ai Parlamentului European, pentru a se preciza dacă, când și cum poate fi revocată unilateral respectiva notificare. Acești reclamanți, în susținerea cărora au intervenit alți doi membri ai Parlamentului Regatului Unit, doresc să știe dacă notificarea prevăzută la articolul 50 TUE poate fi revocată unilateral înainte de expirarea perioadei de doi ani prevăzută de acest articol, ceea ce ar avea ca efect că, în cazul în care notificarea efectuată de Regatul Unit ar fi revocată, acest stat membru ar rămâne în Uniune. Aceștia au invitat Court of Session (Scotland) [Curtea Supremă Civilă (Scoția)] să adreseze Curții o întrebare preliminară cu privire la acest aspect. În apărare, secretarul de stat pentru ieșirea din Uniunea Europeană a susținut că întrebarea era ipotetică și teoretică, ținând seama de luarea de poziție a guvernului Regatului Unit potrivit căreia notificarea nu va fi revocată.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session (Scotland, Regatul Unit)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Parlamentul Regatului Unit Parliament of the Regatul Unit of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, doi membri ai Scottish Parliament (Parlamentul Scoțian, Regatul Unit) și trei membri ai Parlamentului European."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Parlamentul Regatului Unit Parliament of the Regatul Unit of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, doi membri ai Scottish Parliament (Parlamentul Scoțian, Regatul Unit) și trei membri ai Parlamentului European."->"19 decembrie 2017";
  "19 decembrie 2017"->"Court of Session (Scotland, Regatul Unit)";
  "19 decembrie 2017"->"Dacă notificarea prevăzută la articolul 50 TUE poate fi revocată unilateral înainte de expirarea perioadei de doi ani.."[dir=none];
    
}