mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

Le 24 avril 2019, le procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Lyon a émis un mandat d’arrêt européen aux fins de poursuites pénales engagées à l’encontre de JR, soupçonné d’avoir été impliqué dans des infractions liées à une organisation criminelle.
Ce mandat était émis en exécution d’un mandat d’arrêt national décerné le même jour par le juge d’instruction du tribunal de grande instance de Lyon.
Ce même 24 avril 2019, JR a été arrêté au Luxembourg sur la base du mandat d’arrêt européen. Toutefois, le 25 avril 2019, le juge d’instruction du tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Luxembourg) auquel JR avait été présenté a remis ce dernier en liberté, après avoir considéré que la description des faits figurant dans ledit mandat d’arrêt européen était très succincte et ne lui permettait pas de comprendre la nature des infractions reprochées à JR.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "le procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"[shape=trapezium];
  "mandat d’arrêt national"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Luxembourg)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "le procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon"->"mandat d’arrêt européen"[label="Le 24 avril 2019"];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon"->"mandat d’arrêt national"[label="Le 24 avril 2019"];
  "mandat d’arrêt national"->"mandat d’arrêt européen"[dir=none];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"->"JR"[label="24 avril 2019"];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Luxembourg)"->"JR"[label="le 25 avril 2019, le juge d’instruction du tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Luxembourg) auquel JR avait été présenté a remis ce dernier en liberté"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Državni odvjetnik pri tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Okružni sud u Lyonu) 24. travnja 2019. protiv osobe JR, osumnjičene za sudjelovanje u kaznenim djelima povezanim sa zločinačkim udruženjem, izdao je europski uhidbeni nalog radi kaznenog progona.
Taj je nalog izdan slijedom izvršenja nacionalnog uhidbenog naloga koji je istoga dana izdao istražni sudac tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Okružni sud u Lyonu).
Na temelju europskog uhidbenog naloga, osoba JR je istoga dana, 24. travnja 2019., uhićena u Luksemburgu. Međutim, 25. travnja 2019. istražni sudac tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Okružni sud u Luxembourgu, Luksemburg), kojemu je osoba JR dovedena, pustio je na slobodu, zaključivši da je činjenični opis iz tog europskog uhidbenog naloga štur te da na temelju njega nije u mogućnosti shvatiti prirodu kaznenih djela koja se osobi JR stavljaju na teret.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Državni odvjetnik pri tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Okružni sud u Lyonu) tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Okružni sud u Lyonu)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Okružni sud u Lyonu)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europski uhidbeni nalog"[shape=trapezium];
  "nacionalnog uhidbenog naloga"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg Okružni sud u Luxembourgu, Luksemburg"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Državni odvjetnik pri tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Okružni sud u Lyonu) tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Okružni sud u Lyonu)"->"europski uhidbeni nalog"[label="24. travnja 2019."];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Okružni sud u Lyonu)"->"nacionalnog uhidbenog naloga"[label="24. travnja 2019."];
  "nacionalnog uhidbenog naloga"->"europski uhidbeni nalog"[dir=none];
  "europski uhidbeni nalog"->"JR"[label="24. travnja 2019."];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg Okružni sud u Luxembourgu, Luksemburg"->"JR"[label="25. travnja 2019. istražni sudac tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Okružni sud u Luxembourgu, Luksemburg), kojemu je osoba JR dovedena, pustio je na slobodu"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 24 aprile 2019 il procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (procuratore della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di primo grado di Lione) ha emesso un mandato d’arresto europeo ai fini dell’esercizio di un’azione penale promossa nei confronti di JR, sospettato di essere stato coinvolto in reati connessi a un’organizzazione criminale.
Tale mandato è stato emesso in esecuzione di un mandato d’arresto nazionale emesso lo stesso giorno dal giudice istruttore del tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Tribunale di primo grado di Lione).
Lo stesso 24 aprile 2019, JR è stato arrestato a Lussemburgo in base al mandato d’arresto europeo. Tuttavia, il 25 aprile 2019, il giudice istruttore del tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Tribunale circoscrizionale di Lussemburgo, Lussemburgo), al quale era stato presentato, ha rimesso quest’ultimo in libertà, dopo aver considerato che la descrizione dei fatti che figurava in detto mandato d’arresto europeo era molto succinta e non gli consentiva di comprendere la natura dei reati contestati a JR.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Procuratore della Repubblica tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Tribunale di primo grado di Lione"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Tribunale di primo grado di Lione"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"[shape=trapezium];
  "mandato d’arresto nazionale"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg Tribunale circoscrizionale di Lussemburgo"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Procuratore della Repubblica tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Tribunale di primo grado di Lione"->"mandato d’arresto europeo"[label="Il 24 aprile 2019"];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Tribunale di primo grado di Lione"->"mandato d’arresto nazionale"[label="Il 24 aprile 2019"];
  "mandato d’arresto nazionale"->"mandato d’arresto europeo"[dir=none];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"->"JR"[label="24 aprile 2019"];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg Tribunale circoscrizionale di Lussemburgo"->"JR"[label="25 aprile 2019"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

2019. gada 27. martāprocureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours izdeva Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi, lai veiktu kriminālvajāšanu pret YC, kurš tiek turēts aizdomās par piedalīšanos bruņotā uzbrukumā Francijā.
Ar šo orderi tika īstenots valsts apcietināšanas orderis, ko tajā pašā dienā bija izdevis tribunal de grande instance de Tours izmeklētājtiesnesis.
Šajā pašā 2019. gada 24. aprīlī JR tika apcietināts Luksemburgā, pamatojoties uz Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi. Tomēr 2019. gada 25. aprīlītribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg [Luksemburgas apgabaltiesas] (Luksemburga) izmeklētājtiesnesis, kura priekšā tika stādīts JR, atbrīvoja nupat minēto, jo uzskatīja, ka faktu apraksts minētajā Eiropas apcietināšanas orderī bijis ļoti īss un neļāva viņam saprast, kādi noziedzīgi nodarījumi tiek pārmesti JR.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Lionas apgabaltiesa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Lionas apgabaltiesa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[shape=trapezium];
  "valsts apcietināšanas orderis"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Luksemburgas apgabaltiesas) (Luksemburga)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Tours tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Lionas apgabaltiesa"->"Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[label="2019. gada 24. aprīlī"];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Lionas apgabaltiesa"->"valsts apcietināšanas orderis"[label="2019. gada 24. aprīlī"];
  "valsts apcietināšanas orderis"->"Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[dir=none];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"->"JR"[label="2019. gada 24. aprīlī JR tika apcietināts Luksemburgā"];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Luksemburgas apgabaltiesas) (Luksemburga)"->"JR"[label="2019. gada 25. aprīlī"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2019 m. balandžio 24 d. Respublikos prokuroras prie Tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Liono apygardos teismas) išdavė Europos arešto orderį, kad būtų vykdomas JR, įtariamo dalyvavimu darant nusikaltimus, susijusius su nusikalstamu susivienijimu, baudžiamasis persekiojimas.
Šis orderis buvo išduotas vykdant nutartį skirti suėmimą, kurią tą pačią dieną priėmė Tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Liono apygardos teismas) ikiteisminio tyrimo teisėjas.
Remiantis Europos arešto orderiu, 2019 m. balandžio 24 d. JR buvo suimtas Liuksemburge. Tačiau 2019 m. balandžio 25 d.Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Liuksemburgo apygardos teismas, Liuksemburgas) ikiteisminio tyrimo teisėjas, kuriam JR buvo pristatytas, paleido jį, nes manė, kad faktinės aplinkybės Europos arešto orderyje nurodytos labai glaustai ir neleidžia jam suprasti JR inkriminuojamų nusikalstamų veikų pobūdžio.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Respublikos prokuroras tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Liono apygardos teismas)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Liono apygardos teismas)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europos arešto orderis"[shape=trapezium];
  "Nacionalinis arešto orderis"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Liuksemburgo apygardos teismas, Liuksemburgas)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Respublikos prokuroras tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Liono apygardos teismas)"->"Europos arešto orderis"[label="2019 m. balandžio 24 d."];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Liono apygardos teismas)"->"Nacionalinis arešto orderis"[label="2019 m. balandžio 24 d."];
  "Nacionalinis arešto orderis"->"Europos arešto orderis"[dir=none];
  "Europos arešto orderis"->"JR"[label="2019 m. balandžio 24 d."];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Liuksemburgo apygardos teismas, Liuksemburgas)"->"JR"[label="2019 m. balandžio 25 d."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2019. április 24‑én a tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (lyoni általános hatáskörű elsőfokú bíróság) mellett működő államügyész európai elfogatóparancsot bocsátott ki JR ellen bűnszervezethez kapcsolódó bűncselekmények elkövetésében való részvétel gyanúja alapján indítandó büntetőeljárások lefolytatása céljából.
Ezt az elfogatóparancsot a tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (lyoni általános hatáskörű elsőfokú bíróság) vizsgálóbírója által ugyanazon a napon kibocsátott nemzeti elfogatóparancs végrehajtása keretében bocsátották ki.
Ugyanezen a napon, 2019. április 24‑én Luxemburgban elfogták JR‑t az európai elfogatóparancs alapján. 2019. április 25‑én azonban a tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (luxembourgi kerületi bíróság, Luxemburg) vizsgálóbírója, aki elé JR‑t állították, JR‑t szabadon bocsátotta, mivel úgy értékelte, hogy az európai elfogatóparancsban szereplő tényállás túlságosan rövid, ezért nem teszi lehetővé, hogy megértse a JR‑nek felrótt bűncselekmény jellegét.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (lyoni általános hatáskörű elsőfokú bíróság) mellett működő államügyész tribunal de grande instance de Lyon lyoni általános hatáskörű elsőfokú bíróság"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon lyoni általános hatáskörű elsőfokú bíróság"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európai elfogatóparancsot"[shape=trapezium];
  "nemzeti elfogatóparancs"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (luxembourgi kerületi bíróság, Luxemburg)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (lyoni általános hatáskörű elsőfokú bíróság) mellett működő államügyész tribunal de grande instance de Lyon lyoni általános hatáskörű elsőfokú bíróság"->"európai elfogatóparancsot"[label="2019. április 24‑én"];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon lyoni általános hatáskörű elsőfokú bíróság"->"nemzeti elfogatóparancs"[label="2019. április 24‑én"];
  "nemzeti elfogatóparancs"->"európai elfogatóparancsot"[dir=none];
  "európai elfogatóparancsot"->"JR"[label="2019. április 24‑én"];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (luxembourgi kerületi bíróság, Luxemburg)"->"JR"[label="2019. április 25‑én azonban a tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (luxembourgi kerületi bíróság, Luxemburg) vizsgálóbírója, aki elé JR‑t állították, JR‑t szabadon bocsátotta"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fl‑24 ta’ April 2019, il-Prosekutur tar-Repubblika fi ħdan it-tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (il-Qorti Reġjonali ta’ Lyon) ħareġ mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew għall-finijiet ta’ proċeduri kriminali kontra JR, issuspettat li kien involut fi ksur relatat ma’ organizzazzjoni kriminali.
Dan il-mandat kien inħareġ b’eżekuzzjoni ta’ mandat ta’ arrest nazzjonali maħruġ fl-istess ġurnata mill-Qorti Istruttorja tat-tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (il-Qorti Reġjonali ta’ Lyon).
Fl‑istess 24 ta’ April 2019, JR ġie arrestat fil-Lussemburgu abbażi tal-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew. Madankollu, fil‑25 ta’ April 2019, il-Qorti Istruttorja tat-tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (il-Qorti Distrettwali tal-Lussemburgu) fejn kien tressaq JR, ħelsitu wara li kkunsidra li d-deskrizzjoni tal-fatti li jinsabu fl-imsemmi mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew kienu qosra ħafna u ma kinux jippermettulha tifhem in-natura tal-ksur ikkontestat lil JR.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Prosekutur tar-Repubblika tribunal de grande instance de Lyon il-Qorti Reġjonali ta’ Lyon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon il-Qorti Reġjonali ta’ Lyon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[shape=trapezium];
  "mandat ta’ arrest nazzjonali"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (il-Qorti Distrettwali tal-Lussemburgu)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Prosekutur tar-Repubblika tribunal de grande instance de Lyon il-Qorti Reġjonali ta’ Lyon"->"mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[label="24 ta’ April 2019"];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon il-Qorti Reġjonali ta’ Lyon"->"mandat ta’ arrest nazzjonali"[label="24 ta’ April 2019"];
  "mandat ta’ arrest nazzjonali"->"mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[dir=none];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"->"JR"[label="24 ta’ April 2019"];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (il-Qorti Distrettwali tal-Lussemburgu)"->"JR"[label="25 ta’ April 2019, il-Qorti Istruttorja tat-tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (il-Qorti Distrettwali tal-Lussemburgu) fejn kien tressaq JR, ħelsitu"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 24 april 2019 heeft de officier van justitie bij de tribunal de grande instance de Lyon een Europees aanhoudingsbevel uitgevaardigd met het oog op strafvervolging tegen JR, die verdacht wordt van betrokkenheid bij strafbare feiten in het kader van een criminele organisatie.
Dit bevel was uitgevaardigd ter uitvoering van een nationaal aanhoudingsbevel dat diezelfde dag was verstrekt door de rechter-commissaris van de tribunal de grande instance de Lyon.
Op dezelfde datum, 24 april 2019, is JR in Luxemburg aangehouden op basis van het Europees aanhoudingsbevel. Op 25 april 2019 heeft de rechter-commissaris van de tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (rechter in eerste aanleg, Luxemburg) aan wie JR was voorgeleid, hem echter in vrijheid gesteld, na te hebben geoordeeld dat de omschrijving van de feiten in dat Europees aanhoudingsbevel uiterst beknopt was en hem niet in staat stelde te begrijpen wat de aard van de aan JR verweten strafbare feiten was.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "officier van justitie bij de tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[shape=trapezium];
  "nationaal aanhoudingsbevel"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "officier van justitie bij de tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon"->"Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[label="Op 24 april 2019"];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon"->"nationaal aanhoudingsbevel"[label="Op 24 april 2019"];
  "nationaal aanhoudingsbevel"->"Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[dir=none];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"->"JR"[label="Op dezelfde datum, 24 april 2019, is JR in Luxemburg aangehouden op basis van het Europees aanhoudingsbevel."];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg"->"JR"[label="Op 25 april 2019 heeft de rechter-commissaris van de tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (rechter in eerste aanleg, Luxemburg) aan wie JR was voorgeleid, hem echter in vrijheid gesteld"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 24 kwietnia 2019 r. procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (prokurator Republiki przy sądzie pierwszej instancji w Lyonie) wydał europejski nakaz aresztowania w celu przeprowadzenia postępowania karnego wszczętego przeciwko JR, podejrzanemu o udział w przestępstwach związanych z organizacją przestępczą.
Nakaz ten został wydany w wykonaniu krajowego nakazu aresztowania wydanego w tym samym dniu przez sędziego śledczego tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (sądu pierwszej instancji w Lyonie).
W tym samym dniu, tj. 24 kwietnia 2019 r., JR został zatrzymany w Luksemburgu na podstawie europejskiego nakazu aresztowania. Jednakże w dniu 25 kwietnia 2019 r. sędzia śledczy tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (sądu rejonowego w Luksemburgu, Luksemburg), przed którym JR został postawiony, zwolnił tego ostatniego, uznawszy, że opis stanu faktycznego zawarty we wspomnianym europejskim nakazie aresztowania był bardzo zwięzły i nie pozwalał mu na zrozumienie rodzaju zarzucanych JR przestępstw.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "prokurator Republiki przy sądzie pierwszej instancji w Lyonie tribunal de grande instance de Lyon sąd pierwszej instancji w Lyonie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon sąd pierwszej instancji w Lyonie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europejski nakaz aresztowania"[shape=trapezium];
  "krajowy nakaz aresztowania"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg sądu rejonowego w Luksemburgu, Luksemburg"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "prokurator Republiki przy sądzie pierwszej instancji w Lyonie tribunal de grande instance de Lyon sąd pierwszej instancji w Lyonie"->"europejski nakaz aresztowania"[label="24 kwietnia 2019 r."];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon sąd pierwszej instancji w Lyonie"->"krajowy nakaz aresztowania"[label="24 kwietnia 2019 r."];
  "krajowy nakaz aresztowania"->"europejski nakaz aresztowania"[dir=none];
  "europejski nakaz aresztowania"->"JR"[label="24 kwietnia 2019 r."];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg sądu rejonowego w Luksemburgu, Luksemburg"->"JR"[label="zwolnił tego ostatniego, uznawszy, że opis stanu faktycznego zawarty we wspomnianym europejskim nakazie aresztowania był bardzo zwięzły i nie pozwalał mu na zrozumienie rodzaju zarzucanych JR przestępstw."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 24 de abril de 2019, o procurador da República junto do tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Lyon) emitiu um mandado de detenção europeu para efeitos de procedimento penal contra JR, suspeito de ter participado em infrações praticadas por uma organização criminosa.
Este mandado foi emitido em execução de um mandado de detenção nacional emitido no mesmo dia pelo juiz de instrução do tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Lyon).
Também em 24 de abril de 2019, JR foi detido no Luxemburgo, com base no mandado de detenção europeu. No entanto, em 25 de abril de 2019, o juiz de instrução do tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Tribunal de Primeira Instância do Luxemburgo, Luxemburgo), ao qual JR tinha sido presente, colocou‑o em liberdade, após ter considerado que a descrição dos factos constante do referido mandado de detenção europeu era demasiado sucinta e não lhe permitia compreender a natureza das infrações imputadas a JR.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "o procurador da República junto do tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Lyon) tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Lyon)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Lyon)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"[shape=trapezium];
  "mandado de detenção nacional"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg Tribunal de Primeira Instância do Luxemburgo"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "o procurador da República junto do tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Lyon) tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Lyon)"->"mandado de detenção europeu"[label="Em 24 de abril de 2019"];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Lyon)"->"mandado de detenção nacional"[label="Em 24 de abril de 2019"];
  "mandado de detenção nacional"->"mandado de detenção europeu"[dir=none];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"->"JR"[label="24 de abril de 2019"];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg Tribunal de Primeira Instância do Luxemburgo"->"JR"[label="em liberdade, após ter considerado que a descrição dos factos constante do referido mandado de detenção europeu era demasiado sucinta e não lhe permitia compreender a natureza das infrações imputadas a JR."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La data de 24 aprilie 2019, procurorul Republicii de pe lângă tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Tribunalul de Mare Instanță din Lyon) a emis un mandat european de arestare pentru efectuarea urmăririi penale inițiate împotriva lui JR, bănuit că ar fi fost implicat în săvârșirea unor infracțiuni de criminalitate organizată.
Acest mandat a fost emis pentru executarea unui mandat de arestare național emis în aceeași zi de judecătorul de instrucție din cadrul tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Tribunalul de Mare Instanță din Lyon).
În aceeași zi, JR a fost arestat în Luxemburg pe baza mandatului european de arestare. Cu toate acestea, la data de 25 aprilie 2019, judecătorul de instrucție din cadrul tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Tribunalul Districtual din Luxemburg), la care fusese prezentat JR, l‑a pus pe acesta în libertate, considerând că descrierea faptelor din mandatul european de arestare menționat era foarte succintă și nu îi permitea să înțeleagă natura infracțiunilor imputate lui JR.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "procurorul Republicii de pe lângă tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Tribunalul de Mare Instanță din Lyon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Tribunalul de Mare Instanță din Lyon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat european de arestare"[shape=trapezium];
  "mandat de arestare național"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg Tribunalul Districtual din Luxemburg"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "procurorul Republicii de pe lângă tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Tribunalul de Mare Instanță din Lyon"->"mandat european de arestare"[label="La data de 24 aprilie 2019"];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Tribunalul de Mare Instanță din Lyon"->"mandat de arestare național"[label="La data de 24 aprilie 2019"];
  "mandat de arestare național"->"mandat european de arestare"[dir=none];
  "mandat european de arestare"->"JR"[label="La data de 24 aprilie 2019"];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg Tribunalul Districtual din Luxemburg"->"JR"[label="la data de 25 aprilie 2019"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 24. apríla 2019 prokurátor republiky pri Tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Prvostupňový súd Lyon, Francúzsko) vydal európsky zatykač na účely trestného stíhania začatého proti JR, ktorý je podozrivý z účasti na spáchaní trestných činov súvisiacich so zločineckou organizáciou.
Tento zatykač bol vydaný na základe vnútroštátneho zatykača, ktorý vydal v ten istý deň vyšetrovací sudca na Tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Prvostupňový súd Lyon).
Ešte v ten istý deň, t. j. 24. apríla 2019, bol JR zadržaný v Luxembursku na základe európskeho zatykača. Dňa 25. apríla 2019 však vyšetrovací sudca na Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Okresný súd Luxemburg, Luxembursko), pred ktorého bol JR predvedený, prepustil JR na slobodu, lebo sa domnieval, že opis skutkov v európskom zatykači je príliš stručný a neumožňuje mu pochopiť povahu trestných činov, zo spáchania ktorých je JR podozrivý.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "prokurátor republiky pri Tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Prvostupňový súd Lyon, Francúzsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Prvostupňový súd Lyon, Francúzsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európsky zatykač"[shape=trapezium];
  "vnútroštátny zatykač"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg Okresný súd Luxemburg, Luxembursko"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "prokurátor republiky pri Tribunal de grande instance de Lyon tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Prvostupňový súd Lyon, Francúzsko)"->"európsky zatykač"[label="Dňa 24. apríla 2019"];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Prvostupňový súd Lyon, Francúzsko)"->"vnútroštátny zatykač"[label="Dňa 24. apríla 2019"];
  "vnútroštátny zatykač"->"európsky zatykač"[dir=none];
  "európsky zatykač"->"JR"[label="24. apríla 2019"];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg Okresný súd Luxemburg, Luxembursko"->"JR"[label="Dňa 25. apríla 2019 však vyšetrovací sudca na Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Okresný súd Luxemburg, Luxembursko), pred ktorého bol JR predvedený, prepustil JR na slobodu"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Procureur de la République (državni tožilec) pri tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (okrožno sodišče v Lyonu) je 24. aprila 2019 izdal evropski nalog za prijetje zaradi kazenskega pregona zoper osebo JR, ki je osumljena, da je bila vpletena v kazniva dejanja, povezana s hudodelsko združbo.
Ta nalog je bil izdan na podlagi nacionalnega naloga za prijetje, ki ga je istega dne izdal preiskovalni sodnik pri tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (okrožno sodišče v Lyonu).
Oseba JR je bila 24. aprila 2019, torej istega dne, prijeta v Luksemburgu na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje. Vendar je preiskovalni sodnik pri tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (okrožno sodišče v Luxembourgu, Luksemburg), pred katerega je bila privedena oseba JR, 25. aprila 2019 odredil njeno izpustitev, ker je menil, da je opis dejstev v navedenem evropskem nalogu za prijetje zelo jedrnat in da na podlagi tega opisa ni mogoče razbrati narave kaznivih dejanj, ki se očitajo osebi JR.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Procureur de la République (državni tožilec) pri tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (okrožno sodišče v Lyonu) tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (okrožno sodišče v Lyonu)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (okrožno sodišče v Lyonu)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "evropski nalog za prijetje"[shape=trapezium];
  "nacionalnega naloga za prijetje"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (okrožno sodišče v Luxembourgu, Luksemburg)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Procureur de la République (državni tožilec) pri tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (okrožno sodišče v Lyonu) tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (okrožno sodišče v Lyonu)"->"evropski nalog za prijetje"[label="24. aprila 2019"];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (okrožno sodišče v Lyonu)"->"nacionalnega naloga za prijetje"[label="24. aprila 2019"];
  "nacionalnega naloga za prijetje"->"evropski nalog za prijetje"[dir=none];
  "evropski nalog za prijetje"->"JR"[label="24. aprila 2019"];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (okrožno sodišče v Luxembourgu, Luksemburg)"->"JR"[label="25. aprila 2019 odredil njeno izpustitev"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Tribunal de grande instance de Lyonin syyttäjäviranomainen antoi 24.4.2019 eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen JR:ään, jonka epäiltiin osallistuneen erääseen rikollisjärjestöön liittyviin rikoksiin, kohdistuvia syytetoimenpiteitä varten.
Tämä pidätysmääräys annettiin tribunal de grande instance de Lyonin tutkintatuomarin samana päivänä antaman kansallisen pidätysmääräyksen perusteella.
JR pidätettiin samana päivänä 24.4.2019 Luxemburgissa eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen perusteella. Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourgin (piirituomioistuin, Luxemburg), jonka eteen JR oli toimitettu, tutkintatuomari kuitenkin vapautti hänet 25.4.2019 katsottuaan, että eurooppalaisessa pidätysmääräyksessä esitetty tosiseikkojen kuvaus oli hyvin suppea, eikä hän voinut sen perusteella päätellä, mihin rikoksiin JR:n epäiltiin syyllistyneen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal de grande instance de Lyonin syyttäjäviranomainen tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Tribunal de grande instance de Lyonin"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Tribunal de grande instance de Lyonin"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[shape=trapezium];
  "kansallisen pidätysmääräyksen"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (piirituomioistuin, Luxemburg)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Tribunal de grande instance de Lyonin syyttäjäviranomainen tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Tribunal de grande instance de Lyonin"->"eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[label="24.4.2019"];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon Tribunal de grande instance de Lyonin"->"kansallisen pidätysmääräyksen"[label="24.4.2019"];
  "kansallisen pidätysmääräyksen"->"eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[dir=none];
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"->"JR"[label="24.4.2019"];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (piirituomioistuin, Luxemburg)"->"JR"[label="vapautti hänet 25.4.2019"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Den 24 april 2019 utfärdade åklagaren vid Tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Förstainstansdomstolen i Lyon) en europeisk arresteringsorder för lagföring av JR, som misstänktes för att ha varit inblandad i brott som kunde kopplas till en kriminell organisation.
Denna order utfärdades för att verkställa en nationell arresteringsorder som meddelats samma dag av förundersökningsdomaren vid Tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Förstainstansdomstolen i Lyon).
Samma dag, den 24 april 2019, greps JR i Luxemburg med stöd av den europeiska arresteringsordern. Förundersökningsdomaren vid tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Distriktsdomstolen i Luxemburg, Luxemburg), som JR ställdes inför, släppte emellertid JR den 25 april 2019, med motiveringen att beskrivningen av de faktiska omständigheterna i den europeiska arresteringsordern var mycket kortfattad och inte gjorde det möjligt att förstå arten av de brott som JR misstänktes för.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "åklagaren vid tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Förstainstansdomstolen i Lyon)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Förstainstansdomstolen i Lyon)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europeisk arresteringsorder"[shape=trapezium];
  "nationell arresteringsorder"[shape=trapezium];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Distriktsdomstolen i Luxemburg, Luxemburg)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "JR"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "åklagaren vid tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Förstainstansdomstolen i Lyon)"->"europeisk arresteringsorder"[label="Den 24 april 2019"];
  "The tribunal de grande instance de Lyon (Förstainstansdomstolen i Lyon)"->"nationell arresteringsorder"[label="Den 24 april 2019"];
  "nationell arresteringsorder"->"europeisk arresteringsorder"[dir=none];
  "europeisk arresteringsorder"->"JR"[label="24 april 2019"];
  "The tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Distriktsdomstolen i Luxemburg, Luxemburg)"->"JR"[label="släppte emellertid JR den 25 april 2019"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

On 28 May 2019, the procureur d’État du Luxembourg (State Prosecutor, Luxembourg) requested that the chambre du conseil du tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Investigation Chamber of the District Court, Luxembourg) declare that JR should be surrendered to the French authorities.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The procureur d’État du Luxembourg (State Prosecutor, Luxembourg)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The chambre du conseil du tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Investigation Chamber of the District Court, Luxembourg)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

    
   "The procureur d’État du Luxembourg (State Prosecutor, Luxembourg)"->"Request 28/05/2019";
   "Request 28/05/2019"->"The chambre du conseil du tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Investigation Chamber of the District Court, Luxembourg)";
   "Request 28/05/2019"->"To declare that JR should be surrendered to the French authorities."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 28 май 2019 г. прокурорът на Люксембург (Люксембург) прави искане пред апелативния съдебен състав към Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Окръжен съд Люксембург), пред който се обжалва европейската заповед за арест, да бъде прието, че са налице основания JR да бъде предаден на френските органи.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "прокурорът на Люксембург (Люксембург)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The chambre du conseil du tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg апелативния съдебен състав към Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Окръжен съд Люксембург)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

    
  "прокурорът на Люксембург (Люксембург)"->"На 28 май 2019 г. прокурорът на Люксембург (Люксембург) прави искане";
  "На 28 май 2019 г. прокурорът на Люксембург (Люксембург) прави искане"->"The chambre du conseil du tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg апелативния съдебен състав към Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Окръжен съд Люксембург)";
  "На 28 май 2019 г. прокурорът на Люксембург (Люксембург) прави искане"->"да бъде прието, че са налице основания JR да бъде предаден на френските органи.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.
JR and YC.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel (Luxembourg) and Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Definition of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Criteria — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purpose of criminal proceedings.
Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 28 de mayo de 2019, el Procureur de l’État du Luxembourg (Fiscal General de Luxemburgo) solicitó a la Chambre du Conseil del tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Sala a puerta cerrada del Tribunal de Distrito de Luxemburgo) que declarara que JR debía ser entregado a las autoridades francesas.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Procureur de l’État du Luxembourg (Fiscal General de Luxemburgo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The chambre du conseil du tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Sala a puerta cerrada del Tribunal de Distrito de Luxemburgo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

    
  "Procureur de l’État du Luxembourg (Fiscal General de Luxemburgo)"->"El 28 de mayo de 2019, el Procureur de l’État du Luxembourg (Fiscal General de Luxemburgo) solicitó";
  "El 28 de mayo de 2019, el Procureur de l’État du Luxembourg (Fiscal General de Luxemburgo) solicitó"->"The chambre du conseil du tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Sala a puerta cerrada del Tribunal de Distrito de Luxemburgo)";
  "El 28 de mayo de 2019, el Procureur de l’État du Luxembourg (Fiscal General de Luxemburgo) solicitó"->"que declarara que JR debía ser entregado a las autoridades francesas.."[dir=none];
    
}