mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Polish

W tych właśnie okolicznościach Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland) (naczelny sąd cywilny, izba apelacyjna, pierwszy wydział, Szkocja, Zjednoczone Królestwo) postanowił zawiesić postępowanie i przedłożyć Trybunałowi następujące pytanie prejudycjalne:

„Czy w przypadku gdy zgodnie z art. 50 TUE państwo członkowskie notyfikowało Radzie Europejskiej zamiar wystąpienia z Unii Europejskiej, prawo Unii dopuszcza jednostronne wycofanie tej notyfikacji przez to państwo członkowskie; jeśli tak, to na jakich warunkach i z jakim skutkiem dla pozostania tego państwa członkowskiego w Unii Europejskiej?”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Trybunał"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"->"pytanie prejudycjalne";
  "pytanie prejudycjalne"->"Trybunał";
  "pytanie prejudycjalne"->"Czy w przypadku gdy zgodnie z art. 50 TUE państwo członkowskie notyfikowało Radzie Europejskiej zamiar wystąpienia z Unii Europejskiej, prawo Unii dopuszcza jednostronne wycofanie tej notyfikacji przez to państwo członkowskie; jeśli tak, to na jakich warunkach i z jakim skutkiem dla pozostania tego państwa członkowskiego w Unii Europejskiej?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Portuguese

Nestas condições, a Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland) [Tribunal de Sessão, decidindo em recurso, Secção Interna, Primeiro Juízo (Escócia), Reino Unido] decidiu suspender a instância e submeter ao Tribunal de Justiça a seguinte questão prejudicial:

«No caso de, em conformidade com o artigo 50.o [TUE], um Estado‑Membro ter notificado o Conselho Europeu da sua intenção de se retirar da União Europeia, o direito da [União] permite que essa notificação seja unilateralmente revogada pelo Estado‑Membro notificante e, na afirmativa, em que condições e com que efeitos no que respeita à permanência do Estado‑Membro na União Europeia?»

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tribunal de Justiça"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"->"questão prejudicial";
  "questão prejudicial"->"Tribunal de Justiça";
  "questão prejudicial"->"No caso de, em conformidade com o artigo 50.o [TUE], um Estado‑Membro ter notificado o Conselho Europeu da sua intenção de se retirar da União Europeia, o direito da [União] permite que essa notificação seja unilateralmente revogada pelo Estado‑Membro notificante e, na afirmativa, em que condições e com que efeitos no que respeita à permanência do Estado‑Membro na União Europeia?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Romanian

În aceste condiții, Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland) [Curtea Supremă Civilă, Inner House, Camera întâi (Scoția), Regatul Unit] a hotărât să suspende judecarea cauzei și să adreseze Curții următoarea întrebare preliminară:

„În cazul în care, în temeiul articolului 50 TUE, un stat membru a notificat Consiliului European intenția sa de a se retrage din Uniunea Europeană, dreptul Uniunii permite revocarea unilaterală a notificării de către statul care a efectuat notificarea și, în cazul unui răspuns afirmativ, în ce condiții și cu ce efecte în privința rămânerii statului membru în Uniunea Europeană?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Curții"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"->"următoarea întrebare preliminară";
  "următoarea întrebare preliminară"->"Curții";
  "următoarea întrebare preliminară"->"În cazul în care, în temeiul articolului 50 TUE, un stat membru a notificat Consiliului European intenția sa de a se retrage din Uniunea Europeană, dreptul Uniunii permite revocarea unilaterală a notificării de către statul care a efectuat notificarea și, în cazul unui răspuns afirmativ, în ce condiții și cu ce efecte în privința rămânerii statului membru în Uniunea Europeană?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Slovak

Za týchto podmienok Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland) [Vrchný súd, odvolací senát, prvé oddelenie (Škótsko), Spojené kráľovstvo] rozhodol prerušiť konanie a položiť Súdnemu dvoru túto prejudiciálnu otázku:

„V prípade, že členský štát oznámil Európskej rade v súlade s článkom 50 Zmluvy o fungovaní Európskej únie svoj úmysel vystúpiť z Európskej únie, umožňuje právo Únie, aby oznamujúci členský štát jednostranne odvolal uvedené oznámenie, a pokiaľ áno, za akých podmienok a s akými účinkami vo vzťahu k zotrvaniu členského štátu v Európskej únii?“

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Súdny dvor"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"->"túto prejudiciálnu otázku";
  "túto prejudiciálnu otázku"->"Súdny dvor";
  "túto prejudiciálnu otázku"->"V prípade, že členský štát oznámil Európskej rade v súlade s článkom 50 Zmluvy o fungovaní Európskej únie svoj úmysel vystúpiť z Európskej únie, umožňuje právo Únie, aby oznamujúci členský štát jednostranne odvolal uvedené oznámenie, a pokiaľ áno, za akých podmienok a s akými účinkami vo vzťahu k zotrvaniu členského štátu v Európskej únii?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Slovenian

V teh okoliščinah je Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland) (višje sodišče Škotske, pritožbeni oddelek, prvi senat, Združeno kraljestvo), prekinilo odločanje in Sodišču v predhodno odločanje predložilo to vprašanje:

„Če je država članica na podlagi člena 50 PEU Evropski svet uradno obvestila, da namerava izstopiti iz Evropske unije, ali pravo Unije dopušča, da ta država članica to uradno obvestilo enostransko prekliče, in če to dopušča, kateri so pogoji za preklic in katere so posledice glede neizstopa te države članice iz Evropske unije?“

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sodišču"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"->"v predhodno odločanje predložilo to vprašanje";
  "v predhodno odločanje predložilo to vprašanje"->"Sodišču";
  "v predhodno odločanje predložilo to vprašanje"->"Če je država članica na podlagi člena 50 PEU Evropski svet uradno obvestila, da namerava izstopiti iz Evropske unije, ali pravo Unije dopušča, da ta država članica to uradno obvestilo enostransko prekliče, in če to dopušča, kateri so pogoji za preklic in katere so posledice glede neizstopa te države članice iz Evropske unije?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Finnish

Tässä tilanteessa Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland) (ylin siviilituomioistuin muutoksenhakuasteena, ensimmäinen jaosto (Skotlanti), Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta) päätti lykätä asian käsittelyä ja esittää unionin tuomioistuimelle seuraavan ennakkoratkaisukysymyksen:

”Jos jäsenvaltio on [SEU] 50 artiklan mukaisesti ilmoittanut Eurooppa-neuvostolle aikomuksestaan erota Euroopan unionista, sallitaanko unionin oikeudessa se, että ilmoituksen tehnyt jäsenvaltio peruuttaa ilmoituksen yksipuolisesti, ja jos näin on, millä edellytyksin ja minkälaisin vaikutuksin siltä osin kuin on kyse jäsenvaltion jäämisestä Euroopan unioniin?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "unionin tuomioistuin"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"->"Jos jäsenvaltio on [SEU] 50 artiklan mukaisesti ilmoittanut Eurooppa-neuvostolle aikomuksestaan erota Euroopan unionista, sallitaanko unionin oikeudessa se, että ilmoituksen tehnyt jäsenvaltio peruuttaa ilmoituksen yksipuolisesti, ja jos näin on, millä edellytyksin ja minkälaisin vaikutuksin siltä osin kuin on kyse jäsenvaltion jäämisestä Euroopan unioniin?”";
  "Jos jäsenvaltio on [SEU] 50 artiklan mukaisesti ilmoittanut Eurooppa-neuvostolle aikomuksestaan erota Euroopan unionista, sallitaanko unionin oikeudessa se, että ilmoituksen tehnyt jäsenvaltio peruuttaa ilmoituksen yksipuolisesti, ja jos näin on, millä edellytyksin ja minkälaisin vaikutuksin siltä osin kuin on kyse jäsenvaltion jäämisestä Euroopan unioniin?”"->"unionin tuomioistuin";
  "Jos jäsenvaltio on [SEU] 50 artiklan mukaisesti ilmoittanut Eurooppa-neuvostolle aikomuksestaan erota Euroopan unionista, sallitaanko unionin oikeudessa se, että ilmoituksen tehnyt jäsenvaltio peruuttaa ilmoituksen yksipuolisesti, ja jos näin on, millä edellytyksin ja minkälaisin vaikutuksin siltä osin kuin on kyse jäsenvaltion jäämisestä Euroopan unioniin?”"->"Jos jäsenvaltio on [SEU] 50 artiklan mukaisesti ilmoittanut Eurooppa-neuvostolle aikomuksestaan erota Euroopan unionista, sallitaanko unionin oikeudessa se, että ilmoituksen tehnyt jäsenvaltio peruuttaa ilmoituksen yksipuolisesti, ja jos näin on, millä edellytyksin ja minkälaisin vaikutuksin siltä osin kuin on kyse jäsenvaltion jäämisestä Euroopan unioniin?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Swedish

Mot denna bakgrund beslutade Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland) (Överdomstolen i tvistemål, första avdelningen (Skottland), Förenade kungariket) att vilandeförklara målet och att ställa följande fråga till EU-domstolen:

”I ett fall där en medlemsstat i enlighet med artikel 50 i fördraget om Europeiska unionen har anmält sin avsikt att utträda ur Europeiska unionen till Europeiska rådet, tillåter unionsrätten att den anmälande medlemsstaten ensidigt återkallar sin anmälan, och om så är fallet, under vilka villkor och med vilken verkan avseende medlemsstatens fortsatta medlemskap i Europeiska unionen?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "EU-domstolen"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland)"->"följande fråga till EU-domstolen";
  "följande fråga till EU-domstolen"->"EU-domstolen";
  "följande fråga till EU-domstolen"->"I ett fall där en medlemsstat i enlighet med artikel 50 i fördraget om Europeiska unionen har anmält sin avsikt att utträda ur Europeiska unionen till Europeiska rådet, tillåter unionsrätten att den anmälande medlemsstaten ensidigt återkallar sin anmälan, och om så är fallet, under vilka villkor och med vilken verkan avseende medlemsstatens fortsatta medlemskap i Europeiska unionen?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: English

By separate document lodged at the Court Registry on 2 October 2018, the Commission lodged an application for interim measures under Article 279 TFEU and Article 160(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, seeking an order that the Republic of Poland was, pending the judgment of the Court in the main action:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Commission"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Court Registry"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Article 279 TFEU and Article 160(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice"[shape=trapezium];


   "The Commission"->"Application for interim measures";
   "Application for interim measures"->"Court Registry";
   "Application for interim measures"->"Article 279 TFEU and Article 160(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

С отделна молба, подадена в секретариата на Съда на 2 октомври 2018 г., Комисията подава искане за постановяване на временни мерки на основание член 279 ДФЕС и на член 160, параграф 2 от Процедурния правилник на Съда в очакване на решението на Съда по същество, изразяващи се в това да се разпореди на Република Полша:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Комисията"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "секретариата на Съда"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "член 279 ДФЕС и на член 160, параграф 2 от Процедурния правилник на Съда"[shape=trapezium];


  "Комисията"->"искане за постановяване на временни мерки";
  "искане за постановяване на временни мерки"->"секретариата на Съда";
  "искане за постановяване на временни мерки"->"член 279 ДФЕС и на член 160, параграф 2 от Процедурния правилник на Съда"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Mediante escrito separado, presentado en la Secretaría del Tribunal de Justicia el 2 de octubre de 2018, la Comisión formuló una demanda de medidas provisionales con arreglo al artículo 279 TFUE y al artículo 160, apartado 2, del Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal de Justicia, por la que solicitaba que, a la espera de que el Tribunal de Justicia dictara sentencia en la que zanjara la cuestión de fondo, ordenase a la República de Polonia:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la Comisión"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Secretaría del Tribunal de Justicia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artículo 279 TFUE y al artículo 160, apartado 2, del Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal de Justicia"[shape=trapezium];


  "la Comisión"->"una demanda de medidas provisionales";
  "una demanda de medidas provisionales"->"Secretaría del Tribunal de Justicia";
  "una demanda de medidas provisionales"->"artículo 279 TFUE y al artículo 160, apartado 2, del Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal de Justicia"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Samostatným podáním došlým soudní kanceláři Soudního dvora dne 2. října 2018 podala Komise návrh na nařízení předběžných opatření podle článku 279 SFEU a čl. 160 odst. 2 jednacího řádu Soudního dvora, kterým se domáhala, aby do vydání rozsudku Soudního dvora ve věci samé Soudní dvůr Polské republice nařídil:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Komise"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "soudní kanceláři"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "článku 279 SFEU a čl. 160 odst. 2 jednacího řádu Soudního dvora"[shape=trapezium];


  "Komise"->"návrh na nařízení předběžných opatření";
  "návrh na nařízení předběžných opatření"->"soudní kanceláři";
  "návrh na nařízení předběžných opatření"->"článku 279 SFEU a čl. 160 odst. 2 jednacího řádu Soudního dvora"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Ved særskilt dokument indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 2. oktober 2018 anmodede Kommissionen om foreløbige forholdsregler i henhold til artikel 279 TEUF og artikel 160, stk. 2, i Domstolens procesreglement med henblik på, at Republikken Polen, indtil Domstolen afsiger dom om sagens realitet, skulle pålægges

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Kommissionen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Domstolens Justitskontor"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artikel 279 TEUF og artikel 160, stk. 2, i Domstolens procesreglement"[shape=trapezium];


  "Kommissionen"->"anmodede Kommissionen om foreløbige forholdsregler";
  "anmodede Kommissionen om foreløbige forholdsregler"->"Domstolens Justitskontor";
  "anmodede Kommissionen om foreløbige forholdsregler"->"artikel 279 TEUF og artikel 160, stk. 2, i Domstolens procesreglement"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: German

Mit gesondertem Schriftsatz, der am 2. Oktober 2018 bei der Kanzlei des Gerichtshofs eingegangen ist, hat die Kommission einen Antrag auf einstweilige Anordnungen nach Art. 279 AEUV und Art. 160 Abs. 2 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs gestellt, mit denen der Republik Polen aufgegeben werden sollte, bis zum Erlass des Urteils in der Hauptsache

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "die Kommission"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kanzlei des Gerichtshofs"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Art. 279 AEUV und Art. 160 Abs. 2 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs"[shape=trapezium];


  "die Kommission"->"Antrag auf einstweilige Anordnungen";
  "Antrag auf einstweilige Anordnungen"->"Kanzlei des Gerichtshofs";
  "Antrag auf einstweilige Anordnungen"->"Art. 279 AEUV und Art. 160 Abs. 2 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Eraldi dokumendiga, mis saabus Euroopa Kohtu kantseleisse 2. oktoobril 2018, esitas komisjon ELTL artikli 279 ja Euroopa Kohtu kodukorra artikli 160 lõike 2 alusel ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise taotluse, milles palus kohustada Poola Vabariiki kuni Euroopa Kohtu sisulise otsuse tegemiseni:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "komisjon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Euroopa Kohtu kantseleisse"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ELTL artikli 279 ja Euroopa Kohtu kodukorra artikli 160 lõike 2"[shape=trapezium];


  "komisjon"->"ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise taotluse";
  "ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise taotluse"->"Euroopa Kohtu kantseleisse";
  "ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise taotluse"->"ELTL artikli 279 ja Euroopa Kohtu kodukorra artikli 160 lõike 2"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Με χωριστό δικόγραφο, το οποίο κατέθεσε στη Γραμματεία του Δικαστηρίου στις 2 Οκτωβρίου 2018, η Επιτροπή υπέβαλε αίτηση λήψεως προσωρινών μέτρων δυνάμει του άρθρου 279 ΣΛΕΕ και του άρθρου 160, παράγραφος 2, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας του Δικαστηρίου, προκειμένου το Δικαστήριο να υποχρεώσει τη Δημοκρατία της Πολωνίας, εν αναμονή της αποφάσεως του Δικαστηρίου επί της ουσίας της υποθέσεως:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "η Επιτροπή"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Γραμματεία του Δικαστηρίου"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "άρθρου 279 ΣΛΕΕ και του άρθρου 160, παράγραφος 2, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας του Δικαστηρίου"[shape=trapezium];


  "η Επιτροπή"->"αίτηση λήψεως προσωρινών μέτρων";
  "αίτηση λήψεως προσωρινών μέτρων"->"Γραμματεία του Δικαστηρίου";
  "αίτηση λήψεως προσωρινών μέτρων"->"άρθρου 279 ΣΛΕΕ και του άρθρου 160, παράγραφος 2, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας του Δικαστηρίου"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: French

Par acte séparé, déposé au greffe de la Cour le 2 octobre 2018, la Commission a introduit une demande de mesures provisoires au titre de l’article 279 TFUE et de l’article 160, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour, visant à ordonner à la République de Pologne, dans l’attente de l’arrêt de la Cour statuant sur le fond :

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la Commission"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "greffe de la Cour"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l’article 279 TFUE et de l’article 160, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour"[shape=trapezium];


  "la Commission"->"demande de mesures provisoires";
  "demande de mesures provisoires"->"greffe de la Cour";
  "demande de mesures provisoires"->"l’article 279 TFUE et de l’article 160, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Zasebnim aktom podnesenim tajništvu Suda 2. listopada 2018., Komisija je podnijela zahtjev za određivanje privremenih mjera na temelju članka 279. UFEU‑a i članka 160. stavka 2. Poslovnika Suda, kojim se traži da se Republici Poljskoj, dok Sud ne odluči o meritumu, naloži da:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Komisija"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "tajništvu Suda"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "članka 279. UFEU‑a i članka 160. stavka 2. Poslovnika Suda"[shape=trapezium];


  "Komisija"->"zahtjev za određivanje privremenih mjera";
  "zahtjev za određivanje privremenih mjera"->"tajništvu Suda";
  "zahtjev za određivanje privremenih mjera"->"članka 279. UFEU‑a i članka 160. stavka 2. Poslovnika Suda"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Con atto separato, depositato nella cancelleria della Corte il 2 ottobre 2018, la Commissione ha presentato una domanda di provvedimenti provvisori ai sensi dell’articolo 279 TFUE e dell’articolo 160, paragrafo 2, del regolamento di procedura della Corte, diretta a ordinare alla Repubblica di Polonia, in attesa della pronuncia della Corte sul merito:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la Commissione"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cancelleria della Corte"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "articolo 279 TFUE e dell’articolo 160, paragrafo 2, del regolamento di procedura della Corte"[shape=trapezium];


  "la Commissione"->"domanda di provvedimenti provvisori";
  "domanda di provvedimenti provvisori"->"cancelleria della Corte";
  "domanda di provvedimenti provvisori"->"articolo 279 TFUE e dell’articolo 160, paragrafo 2, del regolamento di procedura della Corte"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Ar atsevišķu dokumentu, kas Tiesas kancelejā iesniegts 2018. gada 2. oktobrī, Komisija iesniedza pieteikumu par pagaidu pasākumu noteikšanu saskaņā ar LESD 279. pantu un Tiesas Reglamenta 160. panta 2. punktu, lūdzot Tiesu, gaidot Tiesas spriedumu pēc būtības, piespriest Polijas Republikai:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Komisija"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tiesas kancelejā"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "LESD 279. pants un Tiesas Reglamenta 160. panta 2. punkts"[shape=trapezium];


  "Komisija"->"pieteikumu par pagaidu pasākumu noteikšanu";
  "pieteikumu par pagaidu pasākumu noteikšanu"->"Tiesas kancelejā";
  "pieteikumu par pagaidu pasākumu noteikšanu"->"LESD 279. pants un Tiesas Reglamenta 160. panta 2. punkts"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Atskiru dokumentu (jį Teisingumo Teismo kanceliarija gavo 2018 m. spalio 2 d.) Komisija pateikė prašymą dėl laikinųjų apsaugos priemonių taikymo pagal SESV 279 straipsnį ir Teisingumo Teismo procedūros reglamento 160 straipsnio 2 dalį; juo prašė įpareigoti Lenkijos Respubliką, kol Teisingumo Teismas priims sprendimą dėl esmės:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Komisija"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Teisingumo Teismo kanceliarija"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "SESV 279 straipsnį ir Teisingumo Teismo procedūros reglamento 160 straipsnio 2 dalį"[shape=trapezium];


  "Komisija"->"prašymą dėl laikinųjų apsaugos priemonių taikymo";
  "prašymą dėl laikinųjų apsaugos priemonių taikymo"->"Teisingumo Teismo kanceliarija";
  "prašymą dėl laikinųjų apsaugos priemonių taikymo"->"SESV 279 straipsnį ir Teisingumo Teismo procedūros reglamento 160 straipsnio 2 dalį"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

A Bizottság a 2018. október 2‑án benyújtott külön iratban az EUMSZ 279. cikk és a Bíróság eljárási szabályzata 160. cikkének (2) bekezdése alapján ideiglenes intézkedés iránti kérelmet nyújtott be, amelyben annak elrendelését kéri a Bíróságtól, hogy a Lengyel Köztársaság a Bíróságnak az ügy érdemében történő ítélethozataláig:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "A Bizottság"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Bírósági Hivatal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "EUMSZ 279. cikk és a Bíróság eljárási szabályzata 160. cikkének (2) bekezdése"[shape=trapezium];


  "A Bizottság"->"ideiglenes intézkedés iránti kérelmet";
  "ideiglenes intézkedés iránti kérelmet"->"Bírósági Hivatal";
  "ideiglenes intézkedés iránti kérelmet"->"EUMSZ 279. cikk és a Bíróság eljárási szabályzata 160. cikkének (2) bekezdése"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Permezz ta’ att separat, ippreżentat fir-Reġistru tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja fit‑2 ta’ Ottubru 2018, il-Kummissjoni ressqet talba għal miżuri provviżorji skont l-Artikolu 279 TFUE u l-Artikolu 160(2) tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja intiżi, sabiex sakemm tinqata’ s-sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja dwar il-mertu, ir-Repubblika tal-Polonja tiġi ordnata:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "il-Kummissjoni"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Reġistru tal-Qorti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l-Artikolu 279 TFUE u l-Artikolu 160(2) tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja"[shape=trapezium];


  "il-Kummissjoni"->"talba għal miżuri provviżorji";
  "talba għal miżuri provviżorji"->"Reġistru tal-Qorti";
  "talba għal miżuri provviżorji"->"l-Artikolu 279 TFUE u l-Artikolu 160(2) tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Bij afzonderlijke akte, neergelegd ter griffie van het Hof op 2 oktober 2018, heeft de Commissie krachtens artikel 279 VWEU en artikel 160, lid 2, van het Reglement voor de procesvoering van het Hof, verzocht om voorlopige maatregelen teneinde de Republiek Polen, in afwachting van het arrest van het Hof, ten gronde te gelasten:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "de Commissie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "griffie van het Hof"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artikel 279 VWEU en artikel 160, lid 2, van het Reglement voor de procesvoering van het Hof"[shape=trapezium];


  "de Commissie"->"verzocht om voorlopige maatregelen";
  "verzocht om voorlopige maatregelen"->"griffie van het Hof";
  "verzocht om voorlopige maatregelen"->"artikel 279 VWEU en artikel 160, lid 2, van het Reglement voor de procesvoering van het Hof"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Odrębnym aktem, złożonym w sekretariacie Trybunału w dniu 2 października 2018 r., Komisja wystąpiła także z wnioskiem o zastosowanie na podstawie art. 279 TFUE oraz art. 160 § 2 regulaminu postępowania przed Trybunałem środków tymczasowych mających na celu nakazanie Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w oczekiwaniu na wyrok Trybunału rozstrzygający sprawę co do istoty:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Komisja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sekretariacie Trybunału"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "art. 279 TFUE oraz art. 160 § 2 regulaminu postępowania przed Trybunałem"[shape=trapezium];


  "Komisja"->"wnioskiem o zastosowanie środków tymczasowych";
  "wnioskiem o zastosowanie środków tymczasowych"->"sekretariacie Trybunału";
  "wnioskiem o zastosowanie środków tymczasowych"->"art. 279 TFUE oraz art. 160 § 2 regulaminu postępowania przed Trybunałem"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Por requerimento separado, apresentado na Secretaria do Tribunal de Justiça em 2 de outubro de 2018, a Comissão apresentou um pedido de medidas provisórias ao abrigo do artigo 279.o TFUE e do artigo 160.o, n.o 2, do Regulamento de Processo do Tribunal de Justiça, requerendo que fosse ordenado à República da Polónia que, até à prolação do acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça sobre o mérito:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "a Comissão"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Secretaria do Tribunal de Justiça"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artigo 279.o TFUE e do artigo 160.o, n.o 2, do Regulamento de Processo do Tribunal de Justiça"[shape=trapezium];


  "a Comissão"->"pedido de medidas provisórias";
  "pedido de medidas provisórias"->"Secretaria do Tribunal de Justiça";
  "pedido de medidas provisórias"->"artigo 279.o TFUE e do artigo 160.o, n.o 2, do Regulamento de Processo do Tribunal de Justiça"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Prin act separat, depus la grefa Curții la 2 octombrie 2018, Comisia a introdus o cerere de măsuri provizorii în temeiul articolului 279 TFUE și al articolului 160 alineatul (2) din Regulamentul de procedură al Curții, solicitând Curții să dispună obligarea Republicii Polone, până la pronunțarea hotărârii pe fond:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Comisia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "grefa Curții"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "articolului 279 TFUE și al articolului 160 alineatul (2) din Regulamentul de procedură al Curții"[shape=trapezium];


  "Comisia"->"o cerere de măsuri provizorii";
  "o cerere de măsuri provizorii"->"grefa Curții";
  "o cerere de măsuri provizorii"->"articolului 279 TFUE și al articolului 160 alineatul (2) din Regulamentul de procedură al Curții"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Samostatným podaním doručeným do kancelárie Súdneho dvora 2. októbra 2018 Komisia podala návrh na nariadenie predbežných opatrení podľa článku 279 ZFEÚ a článku 160 ods. 2 Rokovacieho poriadku Súdneho dvora, v ktorom navrhovala, aby Súdny dvor ešte predtým, ako vydá konečné rozhodnutie vo veci samej, Poľskej republike nariadil:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Komisia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "kancelárie Súdneho dvora"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "článku 279 ZFEÚ a článku 160 ods. 2 Rokovacieho poriadku Súdneho dvora"[shape=trapezium];


  "Komisia"->"návrh na nariadenie predbežných opatrení";
  "návrh na nariadenie predbežných opatrení"->"kancelárie Súdneho dvora";
  "návrh na nariadenie predbežných opatrení"->"článku 279 ZFEÚ a článku 160 ods. 2 Rokovacieho poriadku Súdneho dvora"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Komisija je 2. oktobra 2018 v sodnem tajništvu Sodišča z ločeno vlogo vložila predlog za izdajo začasnih odredb na podlagi člena 279 PDEU in člena 160(2) Poslovnika Sodišča, s katerim je predlagala, naj se Republiki Poljski odredi, da do izdaje sodbe, s katero bo Sodišče vsebinsko odločilo o zadevi:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Komisija"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sodnem tajništvu Sodišča"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "člena 279 PDEU in člena 160(2) Poslovnika Sodišča"[shape=trapezium];


  "Komisija"->"predlog za izdajo začasnih odredb";
  "predlog za izdajo začasnih odredb"->"sodnem tajništvu Sodišča";
  "predlog za izdajo začasnih odredb"->"člena 279 PDEU in člena 160(2) Poslovnika Sodišča"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Komissio teki unionin tuomioistuimen kirjaamoon 2.10.2018 toimittamallaan erillisellä asiakirjalla SEUT 279 artiklaan ja unionin tuomioistuimen työjärjestyksen 160 artiklan 2 kohtaan perustuvan välitoimihakemuksen, jossa se vaati unionin tuomioistuinta määräämään, että siihen asti, kunnes unionin tuomioistuin on antanut tuomionsa pääasiassa, Puolan tasavalta

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Komissio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "unionin tuomioistuimen kirjaamoon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "SEUT 279 artiklaan ja unionin tuomioistuimen työjärjestyksen 160 artiklan 2 kohtaan"[shape=trapezium];


  "Komissio"->"välitoimihakemuksen";
  "välitoimihakemuksen"->"unionin tuomioistuimen kirjaamoon";
  "välitoimihakemuksen"->"SEUT 279 artiklaan ja unionin tuomioistuimen työjärjestyksen 160 artiklan 2 kohtaan"[dir=none];
    
}