mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Državno tožilstvo na Dunaju je začelo kazenski pregon zoper osebo NJ zaradi štirih dejanj, ki jih je predložitveno sodišče med drugim opredelilo kot tatvino v okviru opravljanja zaposlitve, za katero predložitveno sodišče navaja, da se v odreditveni državi članici kaznuje s kaznijo „najmanj treh let“ v smislu člena 2(2) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584. Navedeno sodišče ugotavlja, da je tako v odreditveni državi članici kot v zaprošeni državi članici za druga dejanja, ki se očitajo osebi NJ, kot je izsiljevanje, najvišja zagrožena kazen zapora vsaj dvanajst mesecev.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Državno tožilstvo na Dunaju"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "člena 2(2) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Državno tožilstvo na Dunaju"->"začelo kazenski pregon.";
  "začelo kazenski pregon"->"NJ";
  "začelo kazenski pregon"->"tatvino v okviru opravljanja zaposlitve."[dir=none];
  "tatvino v okviru opravljanja zaposlitve."->"člena 2(2) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Wienin syyttäjänviranomainen pani vireille rikosoikeudellisen menettelyn NJ:tä vastaan neljän teon perusteella, joita ennakkoratkaisua pyytänyt tuomioistuin pitää muun muassa ammattimaisesti tehtynä varkautena ja joista kyseisen tuomioistuimen mukaan voidaan määrätä pidätysmääräyksen antaneessa jäsenvaltiossa puitepäätöksen 2002/584 2 artiklan 2 kohdan mukaisesti rangaistus, jonka enimmäiskesto on vähintään kolme vuotta. Ennakkoratkaisua pyytänyt tuomioistuin katsoo, että muista teoista, joista NJ:tä syytetään, kuten pakottamisesta, voidaan sekä pidätysmääräyksen antaneessa että täytäntöönpanosta vastaavassa jäsenvaltiossa määrätä rangaistus, jonka enimmäiskesto on vähintään 12 kuukautta.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Wienin syyttäjänviranomainen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "puitepäätöksen 2002/584 2 artiklan 2 kohdan"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Wienin syyttäjänviranomainen"->"pani vireille rikosoikeudellisen menettelyn.";
  "pani vireille rikosoikeudellisen menettelyn"->"NJ";
  "pani vireille rikosoikeudellisen menettelyn"->"ammattimaisesti tehtynä varkautena."[dir=none];
  "ammattimaisesti tehtynä varkautena."->"puitepäätöksen 2002/584 2 artiklan 2 kohdan"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Åklagarmyndigheten i Wien inledde en förundersökning mot NJ avseende fyra gärningar, vilka den hänskjutande domstolen bland annat rubricerat som yrkesmässig stöld, vilket enligt den hänskjutande domstolen kan leda till fängelse ”i minst tre år” i den utfärdande medlemsstaten, i den mening som avses i artikel 2.2 i rambeslut 2002/584. Den hänskjutande domstolen anser att andra gärningar som NJ misstänks för, såsom olaga tvång, både i den utfärdande medlemsstaten och i den anmodade medlemsstaten kan leda till fängelse i minst tolv månader.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Åklagarmyndigheten i Wien"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artikel 2.2 i rambeslut 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Åklagarmyndigheten i Wien"->"inledde en förundersökning.";
  "inledde en förundersökning"->"NJ";
  "inledde en förundersökning"->"yrkesmässig stöld."[dir=none];
  "yrkesmässig stöld."->"artikel 2.2 i rambeslut 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

For the purpose of prosecuting those acts, the Public Prosecutor’s Office, Vienna, issued a European arrest warrant against NJ on 16 May 2019, which was endorsed, in accordance with the first sentence of Paragraph 29(1) of the EU-GJZ, on 20 May 2019, by the Landesgericht Wien (Regional Court, Vienna).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Public Prosecutor’s Office, Vienna"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Landesgericht Wien (Regional Court, Vienna)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "European arrest warrant"[shape=trapezium];
   "The first sentence of Paragraph 29(1) of the EU-GJZ"[shape=trapezium];
    
   "The Public Prosecutor’s Office, Vienna"->"European arrest warrant"[label="Issue 16/05/2019"];
   "Landesgericht Wien (Regional Court, Vienna)"->"Endorsed 20/05/2019";
   "Endorsed 20/05/2019"->"European arrest warrant";
   "Endorsed 20/05/2019"->"The first sentence of Paragraph 29(1) of the EU-GJZ"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

За провеждането на наказателното преследване на посочените деяния, на 16 май 2019 г. прокуратурата във Виена издава европейска заповед за арест срещу NJ, която е одобрена на 20 май 2019 г. от Landesgericht Wien (Областен съд Виена) в съответствие с член 29, параграф 1, първо изречение от Закона за съдебното сътрудничество по наказателноправни въпроси.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "прокуратурата във Виена"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Областен съд Виена)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "европейска заповед за арест"[shape=trapezium];
  "член 29, параграф 1, първо изречение от Закона за съдебното сътрудничество по наказателноправни въпроси"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "прокуратурата във Виена"->"европейска заповед за арест"[label="16 май 2019 г."];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Областен съд Виена)"->"одобрена на 20 май 2019 г.";
  "одобрена на 20 май 2019 г."->"европейска заповед за арест";
  "одобрена на 20 май 2019 г."->"член 29, параграф 1, първо изречение от Закона за съдебното сътрудничество по наказателноправни въпроси"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

 	

A fin de sancionar tales hechos, la Fiscalía de Viena emitió el 16 de mayo de 2019 una orden de detención europea contra NJ, que fue homologada el 20 de mayo de 2019 por el Landesgericht Wien (Tribunal Regional de Viena) con arreglo al artículo 29, apartado 1, primera frase, de la Ley de Cooperación Judicial en Materia Penal.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la Fiscalía de Viena"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Tribunal Regional de Viena)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "orden de detención europea"[shape=trapezium];
  "artículo 29, apartado 1, primera frase, de la Ley de Cooperación Judicial en Materia Penal."[shape=trapezium];
    
  "la Fiscalía de Viena"->"orden de detención europea"[label="el 16 de mayo de 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Tribunal Regional de Viena)"->"homologada el 20 de mayo de 2019";
  "homologada el 20 de mayo de 2019"->"orden de detención europea";
  "homologada el 20 de mayo de 2019"->"artículo 29, apartado 1, primera frase, de la Ley de Cooperación Judicial en Materia Penal."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

Pro účely stíhání za uvedené skutky vydalo státní zastupitelství ve Vídni dne 16. května 2019 evropský zatýkací rozkaz proti NJ, který byl podle první věty § 29 odst. 1 zákona o justiční spolupráci v trestních věcech schválen dne 20. května 2019 Landesgericht Wien (zemský soud ve Vídni).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "státní zastupitelství ve Vídni"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien (zemský soud ve Vídni))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "evropský zatýkací rozkaz"[shape=trapezium];
  "první věty § 29 odst. 1 zákona o justiční spolupráci v trestních věcech"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "státní zastupitelství ve Vídni"->"evropský zatýkací rozkaz"[label="16. května 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien (zemský soud ve Vídni))"->"schválen dne 20. května 2019";
  "schválen dne 20. května 2019"->"evropský zatýkací rozkaz";
  "schválen dne 20. května 2019"->"první věty § 29 odst. 1 zákona o justiční spolupráci v trestních věcech"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

Med henblik på at forfølge disse forhold udstedte anklagemyndigheden i Wien den 16. maj 2019 en europæisk arrestordre mod NJ, som den 20. maj 2019 blev bevilget af Landesgericht Wien (den regionale domstol i Wien) i henhold til § 29, stk. 1, i lov om det retslige samarbejde i straffesager.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "anklagemyndigheden i Wien"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europæisk arrestordre"[shape=trapezium];
  "§ 29, stk. 1, i lov om det retslige samarbejde i straffesager"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "anklagemyndigheden i Wien"->"europæisk arrestordre"[label="16. maj 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien)"->"bevilget den 20. maj 2019";
  "bevilget den 20. maj 2019"->"europæisk arrestordre";
  "bevilget den 20. maj 2019"->"§ 29, stk. 1, i lov om det retslige samarbejde i straffesager"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

 	

Zur Verfolgung dieser Taten erließ die Staatsanwaltschaft Wien am 16. Mai 2019 einen Europäischen Haftbefehl gegen NJ, der im Einklang mit § 29 Abs. 1 Satz 1 des Gesetzes über die Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen am 20. Mai 2019 vom Landesgericht Wien bewilligt wurde.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "die Staatsanwaltschaft Wien"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europäischen Haftbefehl"[shape=trapezium];
  "§ 29 Abs. 1 Satz 1 des Gesetzes über die Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "die Staatsanwaltschaft Wien"->"Europäischen Haftbefehl"[label="16. Mai 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien)"->"20. Mai 2019";
  "20. Mai 2019"->"Europäischen Haftbefehl";
  "20. Mai 2019"->"§ 29 Abs. 1 Satz 1 des Gesetzes über die Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Nende tegude eest kohtu alla andmiseks tegi Viini prokuratuur 16. mail 2019 NJ-i suhtes Euroopa vahistamismääruse, millele Landesgericht Wien (liidumaa kohus Viinis) andis 20. mail 2019 loa vastavalt kriminaalasjades tehtavat õigusalast koostööd käsitleva seaduse § 29 lõike 1 esimesele lausele.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Viini prokuratuur"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[shape=trapezium];
  "kriminaalasjades tehtavat õigusalast koostööd käsitleva seaduse § 29 lõike 1 esimesele lausele."[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Viini prokuratuur"->"Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[label="16. mail 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien)"->"20. mail 2019";
  "20. mail 2019"->"Euroopa vahistamismääruse";
  "20. mail 2019"->"kriminaalasjades tehtavat õigusalast koostööd käsitleva seaduse § 29 lõike 1 esimesele lausele."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Για την ποινική δίωξη των εν λόγω πράξεων, η Εισαγγελία της Βιέννης εξέδωσε, στις 16 Μαΐου 2019, ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως κατά του NJ, το οποίο επικυρώθηκε στις 20 Μαΐου 2019 από το Landesgericht Wien (περιφερειακό δικαστήριο Βιέννης), σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 29, παράγραφος 1, πρώτη περίοδος, του νόμου περί δικαστικής συνεργασίας σε ποινικές υποθέσεις.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Εισαγγελία της Βιέννης"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (περιφερειακό δικαστήριο Βιέννης)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως"[shape=trapezium];
  "άρθρο 29, παράγραφος 1, πρώτη περίοδος, του νόμου περί δικαστικής συνεργασίας σε ποινικές υποθέσεις"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Εισαγγελία της Βιέννης"->"ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως"[label="στις 16 Μαΐου 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (περιφερειακό δικαστήριο Βιέννης)"->"επικυρώθηκε στις 20 Μαΐου 2019";
  "επικυρώθηκε στις 20 Μαΐου 2019"->"ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως";
  "επικυρώθηκε στις 20 Μαΐου 2019"->"άρθρο 29, παράγραφος 1, πρώτη περίοδος, του νόμου περί δικαστικής συνεργασίας σε ποινικές υποθέσεις"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

Aux fins de la poursuite desdits faits, le parquet de Vienne a émis, le 16 mai 2019, un mandat d’arrêt européen à l’encontre de NJ, qui a été homologué, conformément à l’article 29, paragraphe 1, première phrase, de la loi sur la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale, le 20 mai 2019, par le Landesgericht Wien (tribunal régional de Vienne).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "le parquet de Vienne"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (tribunal régional de Vienne)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"[shape=trapezium];
  "l’article 29, paragraphe 1, première phrase, de la loi sur la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "le parquet de Vienne"->"mandat d’arrêt européen"[label="le 16 mai 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (tribunal régional de Vienne)"->"homologué, le 20 mai 2019";
  "homologué, le 20 mai 2019"->"mandat d’arrêt européen";
  "homologué, le 20 mai 2019"->"l’article 29, paragraphe 1, première phrase, de la loi sur la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

U svrhu kaznenog progona zbog tih kaznena djela državno odvjetništvo u Beču izdalo je 16. svibnja 2019. europski uhidbeni nalog protiv osobe NJ, koji je, u skladu s člankom 29. stavkom 1. prvom rečenicom Zakona o pravosudnoj suradnji u kaznenim stvarima, 20. svibnja 2019. potvrdio Landesgericht Wien (Zemaljski sud u Beču).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "državno odvjetništvo u Beču"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Zemaljski sud u Beču)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europski uhidbeni nalog"[shape=trapezium];
  "člankom 29. stavkom 1. prvom rečenicom Zakona o pravosudnoj suradnji u kaznenim stvarima"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "državno odvjetništvo u Beču"->"europski uhidbeni nalog"[label="16. svibnja 2019."];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Zemaljski sud u Beču)"->"20. svibnja 2019. potvrdio";
  "20. svibnja 2019. potvrdio"->"europski uhidbeni nalog";
  "20. svibnja 2019. potvrdio"->"člankom 29. stavkom 1. prvom rečenicom Zakona o pravosudnoj suradnji u kaznenim stvarima"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

Ai fini dell’esercizio dell’azione penale per tali fatti, il 16 maggio 2019 la procura di Vienna ha emesso nei confronti di NJ un mandato d’arresto europeo che, il 20 maggio 2019, è stato convalidato dal Landesgericht Wien (Tribunale del Land, Vienna), conformemente all’articolo 29, paragrafo 1, prima frase, della legge sulla cooperazione giudiziaria in materia penale.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la procura di Vienna"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Tribunale del Land, Vienna)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"[shape=trapezium];
  "articolo 29, paragrafo 1, prima frase"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "la procura di Vienna"->"mandato d’arresto europeo"[label="16 maggio 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Tribunale del Land, Vienna)"->"il 20 maggio 2019, è stato convalidato";
  "il 20 maggio 2019, è stato convalidato"->"mandato d’arresto europeo";
  "il 20 maggio 2019, è stato convalidato"->"articolo 29, paragrafo 1, prima frase"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Lai attiecībā uz minētajiem faktiem sāktu kriminālvajāšanu, Vīnes prokuratūra 2019. gada 16. maijā attiecībā uz NJ izdeva Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi, ko 2019. gada 20. maijā saskaņā ar Likuma par tiesu iestāžu sadarbību krimināllietās 29. panta 1. punkta pirmo teikumu apstiprināja Landesgericht Wien (Vīnes apgabaltiesa).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Vīnes prokuratūra"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Vīnes apgabaltiesa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi"[shape=trapezium];
  "Likuma par tiesu iestāžu sadarbību krimināllietās 29. panta 1. punkta pirmo teikumu"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Vīnes prokuratūra"->"Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi"[label="2019. gada 16. maijā"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Vīnes apgabaltiesa)"->"2019. gada 20. maijā";
  "2019. gada 20. maijā"->"Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi";
  "2019. gada 20. maijā"->"Likuma par tiesu iestāžu sadarbību krimināllietās 29. panta 1. punkta pirmo teikumu"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Nusprendusi vykdyti baudžiamąjį persekiojimą dėl šių veikų Vienos prokuratūra 2019 m. gegužės 16 d. išdavė Europos arešto orderį dėl NJ; šį orderį Landesgericht Wien (Vienos apygardos teismas) patvirtino 2019 m. gegužės 20 d., vadovaudamasis Įstatymo dėl teismų bendradarbiavimo baudžiamosiose bylose 29 straipsnio 1 dalies pirmu sakiniu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Vienos prokuratūra"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Vienos apygardos teismas)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europos arešto orderis"[shape=trapezium];
  "Įstatymo dėl teismų bendradarbiavimo baudžiamosiose bylose 29 straipsnio 1 dalies pirmu sakiniu."[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Vienos prokuratūra"->"Europos arešto orderis"[label="2019 m. gegužės 16 d. išdavė"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Vienos apygardos teismas)"->"patvirtino 2019 m. gegužės 20 d.";
  "patvirtino 2019 m. gegužės 20 d."->"Europos arešto orderis";
  "patvirtino 2019 m. gegužės 20 d."->"Įstatymo dėl teismų bendradarbiavimo baudžiamosiose bylose 29 straipsnio 1 dalies pirmu sakiniu."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Az említett cselekmények miatti büntetőeljárás lefolytatása érdekében a bécsi ügyészség 2019. május 16‑án NJ ellen európai elfogatóparancsot bocsátott ki, amelyet a büntetőügyekben folytatott igazságügyi együttműködésről szóló törvény 29. §‑a (1) bekezdése első mondatának megfelelően a Landesgericht Wien (bécsi regionális bíróság) 2019. május 20‑án jóváhagyott.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "a bécsi ügyészség"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (bécsi regionális bíróság)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európai elfogatóparancsot"[shape=trapezium];
  "a büntetőügyekben folytatott igazságügyi együttműködésről szóló törvény 29. §‑a (1) bekezdése első mondatának"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "a bécsi ügyészség"->"európai elfogatóparancsot"[label="2019. május 16‑án"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (bécsi regionális bíróság)"->"2019. május 20-án jóváhagyott.";
  "2019. május 20-án jóváhagyott."->"európai elfogatóparancsot";
  "2019. május 20-án jóváhagyott."->"a büntetőügyekben folytatott igazságügyi együttműködésről szóló törvény 29. §‑a (1) bekezdése első mondatának"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Għall-finijiet tal-prosekuzzjoni tal-imsemmija fatti, l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Vjenna ħareġ, fis-16 ta’ Mejju 2019, mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew kontra NJ, li ġie approvat, konformement mal-ewwel sentenza tal-Artikolu 29(1) tal-Liġi dwar il-Kooperazzjoni Ġudizzjarja f’Materji Kriminali, fl-20 ta’ Mejju 2019, mil-Landesgericht Wien (il-Qorti Reġjonali ta’ Vjenna).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Vjenna"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Qorti Reġjonali ta’ Vjenna)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[shape=trapezium];
  "l-ewwel sentenza tal-Artikolu 29(1) tal-Liġi dwar il-Kooperazzjoni Ġudizzjarja f’Materji Kriminali"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Vjenna"->"mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[label="fis-16 ta’ Mejju 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Qorti Reġjonali ta’ Vjenna)"->"fl-20 ta’ Mejju 2019";
  "fl-20 ta’ Mejju 2019"->"mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew";
  "fl-20 ta’ Mejju 2019"->"l-ewwel sentenza tal-Artikolu 29(1) tal-Liġi dwar il-Kooperazzjoni Ġudizzjarja f’Materji Kriminali"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Ten behoeve van de vervolging van deze feiten heeft het openbaar ministerie Wenen op 16 mei 2019 een Europees aanhoudingsbevel uitgevaardigd tegen NJ dat op 20 mei 2019 overeenkomstig § 29, lid 1, eerste volzin, EU‑JZG is goedgekeurd door het Landesgericht Wien.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "het openbaar ministerie Wenen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[shape=trapezium];
  "de eerste volzin, EU‑JZG"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "het openbaar ministerie Wenen"->"Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[label="16 mei 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien)"->"dat op 20 mei 2019";
  "dat op 20 mei 2019"->"Europees aanhoudingsbevel";
  "dat op 20 mei 2019"->"de eerste volzin, EU‑JZG"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

W celu ścigania tych czynów prokuratura w Wiedniu wydała w dniu 16 maja 2019 r. europejski nakaz aresztowania NJ, który, zgodnie z § 29 ust. 1 zdanie pierwsze ustawy o współpracy sądowej w sprawach karnych, został zatwierdzony przez Landesgericht Wien (sąd okręgowy w Wiedniu), co nastąpiło w dniu 20 maja 2019 r.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "prokuratura w Wiedniu"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (sąd okręgowy w Wiedniu)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europejski nakaz aresztowania"[shape=trapezium];
  "§ 29 ust. 1 zdanie pierwsze ustawy o współpracy sądowej w sprawach karnych"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "prokuratura w Wiedniu"->"europejski nakaz aresztowania"[label="w dniu 16 maja 2019 r."];
  "Landesgericht Wien (sąd okręgowy w Wiedniu)"->"w dniu 20 maja 2019 r.";
  "w dniu 20 maja 2019 r."->"europejski nakaz aresztowania";
  "w dniu 20 maja 2019 r."->"§ 29 ust. 1 zdanie pierwsze ustawy o współpracy sądowej w sprawach karnych"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Para efeitos do processo penal, a Procuradoria de Viena emitiu, em 16 de maio de 2019, um mandado de detenção europeu contra NJ, que foi homologado, em conformidade com o § 29, n.o 1, primeiro período, da Lei Relativa à Cooperação Judiciária em Matéria Penal, em 20 de maio de 2019, pelo Landesgericht Wien (Tribunal Regional de Viena).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "a Procuradoria de Viena"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Tribunal Regional de Viena)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"[shape=trapezium];
  "o § 29, n.o 1, primeiro período, da Lei Relativa à Cooperação Judiciária em Matéria Penal"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "a Procuradoria de Viena"->"mandado de detenção europeu"[label="emitiu, em 16 de maio de 2019,"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Tribunal Regional de Viena)"->"em 20 de maio de 2019";
  "em 20 de maio de 2019"->"mandado de detenção europeu";
  "em 20 de maio de 2019"->"o § 29, n.o 1, primeiro período, da Lei Relativa à Cooperação Judiciária em Matéria Penal"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

În scopul urmăririi penale, Parchetul din Viena a emis, la 16 mai 2019, un mandat european de arestare împotriva lui NJ, care a fost confirmat, conform articolului 29 alineatul (1) prima teză din Legea privind cooperarea judiciară în materie penală, la 20 mai 2019 de Landesgericht Wien (Tribunalul Regional din Viena).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Parchetul din Viena"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Tribunalul Regional din Viena)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat european de arestare"[shape=trapezium];
  "articolului 29 alineatul (1) prima teză din Legea privind cooperarea judiciară în materie penală"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Parchetul din Viena"->"mandat european de arestare"[label="a emis, la 16 mai 2019,"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Tribunalul Regional din Viena)"->"la 20 mai 2019";
  "la 20 mai 2019"->"mandat european de arestare";
  "la 20 mai 2019"->"articolului 29 alineatul (1) prima teză din Legea privind cooperarea judiciară în materie penală"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Na účely stíhania uvedených skutkov prokuratúra vo Viedni vydala 16. mája 2019 na NJ európsky zatykač, ktorý 20. mája 2019 schválil Landesgericht Wien (Krajinský súd Viedeň) v súlade s § 29 ods. 1 prvou vetou zákona o justičnej spolupráci v trestných veciach.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "prokuratúra vo Viedni"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Krajinský súd Viedeň)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európsky zatykač"[shape=trapezium];
  "§ 29 ods. 1 prvou vetou zákona o justičnej spolupráci v trestných veciach."[shape=trapezium];
    
  "prokuratúra vo Viedni"->"európsky zatykač"[label="vydala 16. mája 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Krajinský súd Viedeň)"->"20. mája 2019 schválil";
  "20. mája 2019 schválil"->"európsky zatykač";
  "20. mája 2019 schválil"->"§ 29 ods. 1 prvou vetou zákona o justičnej spolupráci v trestných veciach."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Državno tožilstvo na Dunaju je 16. maja 2019 v okviru pregona zaradi navedenih dejanj za osebo NJ izdalo evropski nalog za prijetje, ki ga je Landesgericht Wien (deželno sodišče na Dunaju) odobrilo 20. maja 2019 v skladu s členom 29(1), prvi stavek, zakona o pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Državno tožilstvo na Dunaju"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (deželno sodišče na Dunaju)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "evropski nalog za prijetje"[shape=trapezium];
  "členom 29(1), prvi stavek, zakona o pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Državno tožilstvo na Dunaju"->"evropski nalog za prijetje"[label="16. maja 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (deželno sodišče na Dunaju)"->"odobrilo 20. maja 2019";
  "odobrilo 20. maja 2019"->"evropski nalog za prijetje";
  "odobrilo 20. maja 2019"->"členom 29(1), prvi stavek, zakona o pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Näitä tekoja koskevaa rikosoikeudellista menettelyä varten Wienin syyttäjäviranomainen antoi 16.5.2019 NJ:stä eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen, jonka Landesgericht Wien hyväksyi 20.5.2019 oikeudellisesta yhteistyöstä rikosasioissa annetun lain 29 §:n 1 momentin ensimmäisen virkkeen mukaisesti.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Wienin syyttäjäviranomainen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[shape=trapezium];
  "lain 29 §:n 1 momentin ensimmäisen virkkeen"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Wienin syyttäjäviranomainen"->"eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[label="antoi 16.5.2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien)"->"hyväksyi 20.5.2019";
  "hyväksyi 20.5.2019"->"eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen";
  "hyväksyi 20.5.2019"->"lain 29 §:n 1 momentin ensimmäisen virkkeen"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Med anledning av förundersökningen utfärdade åklagarmyndigheten i Wien den 16 maj 2019 en europeisk arresteringsorder avseende NJ i enlighet med 29 § stycke 1 första meningen lagen om straffrättsligt samarbete. Arresteringsordern godkändes den 20 maj 2019 av Landesgericht Wien (Regionala domstolen i Wien).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "åklagarmyndigheten i Wien"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europeisk arresteringsorder"[shape=trapezium];
  "29 § stycke 1 första meningen lagen om straffrättsligt samarbete"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "åklagarmyndigheten i Wien"->"europeisk arresteringsorder"[label="den 16 maj 2019"];
  "Landesgericht Wien (Landesgericht Wien)"->"godkändes den 20 maj 2019";
  "godkändes den 20 maj 2019"->"europeisk arresteringsorder";
  "godkändes den 20 maj 2019"->"29 § stycke 1 första meningen lagen om straffrättsligt samarbete"[dir=none];
}