mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Genom särskild handling, som inkom till domstolens kansli den 2 oktober 2018, ingav kommissionen en ansökan om interimistiska åtgärder enligt artikel 279 FEUF och artikel 160.2 i domstolens rättegångsregler. Kommissionen yrkade därvid att domstolen skulle förplikta Republiken Polen att, fram till dess att domstolen meddelar dom i sak,

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Kommissionen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "domstolens kansli"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artikel 279 FEUF och artikel 160.2 i domstolens rättegångsregler"[shape=trapezium];


  "Kommissionen"->"ansökan om interimistiska åtgärder";
  "ansökan om interimistiska åtgärder"->"domstolens kansli";
  "ansökan om interimistiska åtgärder"->"artikel 279 FEUF och artikel 160.2 i domstolens rättegångsregler"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: English

By her order of 19 October 2018, Commission v Poland (C‑619/18 R, not published, EU:C:2018:852), the Vice-President of the Court provisionally granted that latter request pending the adoption of an order terminating the proceedings for interim measures.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Court of Justice"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Commission v Poland"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

   "The Court of Justice"->"Commission v Poland"[label="Order 19/10/2018"];
   "Commission v Poland"->"Provisionally granted that latter request pending the adoption of an order terminating the proceedings for interim measures."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

С определение от 19 октомври 2018 г., Комисия/Полша (C‑619/18 R, непубликувано, EU:C:2018:852), заместник-председателят на Съда временно уважава последното искане до постановяването на определение, слагащо край на производството по постановяване на временни мерки.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Съда"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Комисия/Полша"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Съда"->"Комисия/Полша"[label="определение от 19 октомври 2018 г."];
  "Комисия/Полша"->"временно уважава последното искане до постановяването на определение, слагащо край на производството по постановяване на временни мерки.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Mediante auto de 19 de octubre de 2018, Comisión/Polonia (C‑619/18 R, no publicado, EU:C:2018:852), la Vicepresidenta del Tribunal de Justicia estimó con carácter provisional esta solicitud hasta que se dictara auto que pusiera fin al procedimiento sobre medidas provisionales.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal de Justicia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comisión/Polonia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Tribunal de Justicia"->"Comisión/Polonia"[label="auto de 19 de octubre de 2018"];
  "Comisión/Polonia"->"Estimó con carácter provisional esta solicitud hasta que se dictara auto que pusiera fin al procedimiento sobre medidas provisionales.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Usnesením ze dne 19. října 2018, Komise v. Polsko (C‑619/18 R, nezveřejněné, EU:C:2018:852), místopředsedkyně Soudního dvora prozatímně vyhověla tomuto návrhu až do vydání usnesení, kterým bude ukončeno řízení o předběžných opatřeních.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Soudního dvora"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komise v. Polsko"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Soudního dvora"->"Komise v. Polsko"[label="Usnesením ze dne 19. října 2018"];
  "Komise v. Polsko"->"místopředsedkyně Soudního dvora prozatímně vyhověla tomuto návrhu až do vydání usnesení, kterým bude ukončeno řízení o předběžných opatřeních.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Ved kendelse af 19. oktober 2018, Kommissionen mod Polen (C-619/18 R, ikke trykt i Sml., EU:C:2018:852), tog Domstolens vicepræsident midlertidigt denne sidstnævnte anmodning til følge, indtil der blev afsagt endelig kendelse i sagen om foreløbige forholdsregler.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Domstolens"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kommissionen mod Polen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Domstolens"->"Kommissionen mod Polen"[label="Ved kendelse af 19. oktober 2018"];
  "Kommissionen mod Polen"->"tog Domstolens vicepræsident midlertidigt denne sidstnævnte anmodning til følge, indtil der blev afsagt endelig kendelse i sagen om foreløbige forholdsregler.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: German

Mit Beschluss vom 19. Oktober 2018, Kommission/Polen (C‑619/18 R, nicht veröffentlicht, EU:C:2018:852), hat die Vizepräsidentin des Gerichtshofs dem letztgenannten Antrag vorläufig bis zum Erlass des Beschlusses stattgegeben, mit dem das Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes beendet wird.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "des Gerichtshofs"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kommission/Polen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "des Gerichtshofs"->"Kommission/Polen"[label="Beschluss vom 19. Oktober 2018"];
  "Kommission/Polen"->"dem letztgenannten Antrag vorläufig bis zum Erlass des Beschlusses stattgegeben, mit dem das Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes beendet wird.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Euroopa Kohtu asepresident rahuldas 19. oktoobri 2018. aasta määrusega komisjon vs. Poola (C‑619/18 R, ei avaldata, EU:C:2018:852) viimati nimetatud taotluse ajutiselt kuni ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise menetlust lõpetava kohtumääruse tegemiseni.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Euroopa Kohtu"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "komisjon vs. Poola"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Euroopa Kohtu"->"komisjon vs. Poola"[label="19. oktoobri 2018. aasta määrusega"];
  "komisjon vs. Poola"->"Rahuldas viimati nimetatud taotluse ajutiselt kuni ajutiste meetmete kohaldamise menetlust lõpetava kohtumääruse tegemiseni.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Με διάταξη της 19ης Οκτωβρίου 2018, Επιτροπή κατά Πολωνίας (C‑619/18 R, μη δημοσιευθείσα, EU:C:2018:852), η Αντιπρόεδρος του Δικαστηρίου δέχθηκε προσωρινά την ως άνω αίτηση λήψεως προσωρινών μέτρων μέχρι να εκδοθεί η διάταξη που θα περάτωνε τη διαδικασία των ασφαλιστικών μέτρων.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "του Δικαστηρίου"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Επιτροπή κατά Πολωνίας"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "του Δικαστηρίου"->"Επιτροπή κατά Πολωνίας"[label="διάταξη της 19ης Οκτωβρίου 2018"];
  "Επιτροπή κατά Πολωνίας"->"δέχθηκε προσωρινά την ως άνω αίτηση λήψεως προσωρινών μέτρων μέχρι να εκδοθεί η διάταξη που θα περάτωνε τη διαδικασία των ασφαλιστικών μέτρων.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: French

Par son ordonnance du 19 octobre 2018, Commission/Pologne (C‑619/18 R, non publiée, EU:C:2018:852), la vice-présidente de la Cour a provisoirement fait droit à cette dernière demande jusqu’au prononcé de l’ordonnance qui mettrait fin à la procédure de référé.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la Cour"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Commission/Pologne"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "la Cour"->"Commission/Pologne"[label="ordonnance du 19 octobre 2018"];
  "Commission/Pologne"->"a provisoirement fait droit à cette dernière demande jusqu’au prononcé de l’ordonnance qui mettrait fin à la procédure de référé.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Rješenjem od 19. listopada 2018., Komisija/Poljska (C‑619/18 R, neobjavljeno, EU:C:2018:852) potpredsjednica Suda privremeno je prihvatila taj zahtjev do objave rješenja kojim se završava postupak privremene pravne zaštite.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Sud"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisija/Poljska"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Sud"->"Komisija/Poljska"[label="Rješenjem od 19. listopada 2018."];
  "Komisija/Poljska"->"Privremeno je prihvatila taj zahtjev do objave rješenja kojim se završava postupak privremene pravne zaštite.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Con ordinanza del 19 ottobre 2018, Commissione/Polonia (C‑619/18 R, non pubblicata, EU:C:2018:852), la vicepresidente della Corte ha accolto provvisoriamente detta domanda fino alla pronuncia dell’ordinanza di chiusura del procedimento sommario.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la Corte"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Commissione/Polonia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "la Corte"->"Commissione/Polonia"[label="ordinanza del 19 ottobre 2018"];
  "Commissione/Polonia"->"ha accolto provvisoriamente detta domanda fino alla pronuncia dell’ordinanza di chiusura del procedimento sommario.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Ar 2018. gada 19. oktobra rīkojumu Komisija/Polija (C‑619/18 R, nav publicēts, EU:C:2018:852) Tiesas priekšsēdētāja vietnieks apmierināja šo pēdējo lūgumu uz laiku līdz galīgā rīkojuma pieņemšanai šajā pagaidu noregulējuma tiesvedībā.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tiesas"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisija/Polija"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Tiesas"->"Komisija/Polija"[label="2018. gada 19. oktobra rīkojumu"];
  "Komisija/Polija"->"apmierināja šo pēdējo lūgumu uz laiku līdz galīgā rīkojuma pieņemšanai šajā pagaidu noregulējuma tiesvedībā.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2018 m. spalio 19 d. Nutartimi Komisija / Lenkija (C‑619/18 R, nepaskelbta Rink., EU:C:2018:852) Teisingumo Teismo pirmininko pavaduotoja preliminariai patenkino pastarąjį prašymą, kol bus priimta nutartis, kuria bus baigta laikinųjų apsaugos priemonių taikymo procedūra.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Teisingumo Teismas"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisija / Lenkija"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Teisingumo Teismas"->"Komisija / Lenkija"[label="2018 m. spalio 19 d. Nutartimi"];
  "Komisija / Lenkija"->"preliminariai patenkino pastarąjį prašymą, kol bus priimta nutartis, kuria bus baigta laikinųjų apsaugos priemonių taikymo procedūra.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

A 2018. október 19‑iBizottság kontra Lengyelország végzésében (C‑619/18 R, nem tették közzé, EU:C:2018:852) a Bíróság elnökhelyettese ideiglenesen, az ideiglenes intézkedés iránti eljárást befejező végzés meghozataláig helyt adott ez utóbbi kérelemnek.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "a Bíróság"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Bizottság kontra Lengyelország"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "a Bíróság"->"Bizottság kontra Lengyelország"[label="2018. október 19‑iBizottság kontra Lengyelország végzésében"];
  "Bizottság kontra Lengyelország"->"Ideiglenesen, az ideiglenes intézkedés iránti eljárást befejező végzés meghozataláig helyt adott ez utóbbi kérelemnek.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Permezz tad-digriet tiegħu tad‑19 ta’ Ottubru 2018, Il‑Kummissjoni vs Il‑Polonja (C‑619/18 R, mhux ippubblikat, EU:C:2018:852), il-Viċi President tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja laqa’ b’mod provviżorju din it-talba tal-aħħar sal-għoti tad-digriet li jagħlaq il-proċeduri għal miżuri provviżorji.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Qorti tal-Ġustizzja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Il‑Kummissjoni vs Il‑Polonja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Qorti tal-Ġustizzja"->"Il‑Kummissjoni vs Il‑Polonja"[label="digriet tiegħu tad‑19 ta’ Ottubru 2018"];
  "Il‑Kummissjoni vs Il‑Polonja"->"laqa’ b’mod provviżorju din it-talba tal-aħħar sal-għoti tad-digriet li jagħlaq il-proċeduri għal miżuri provviżorji.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Bij beschikking van 19 oktober 2018, Commissie/Polen (C‑619/18 R, niet gepubliceerd, EU:C:2018:852), heeft de vicepresident van het Hof dit verzoek voorlopig toegewezen totdat de beschikking zou worden gegeven waarbij de kortgedingprocedure zou worden beëindigd.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "het Hof"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Commissie/Polen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "het Hof"->"Commissie/Polen"[label="beschikking van 19 oktober 2018"];
  "Commissie/Polen"->"heeft de vicepresident van het Hof dit verzoek voorlopig toegewezen totdat de beschikking zou worden gegeven waarbij de kortgedingprocedure zou worden beëindigd.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Postanowieniem z dnia 19 października 2018 r., Komisja/Polska (C‑619/18 R, niepublikowanym, EU:C:2018:852) wiceprezes Trybunału tymczasowo uwzględnił ten ostatni wniosek do czasu wydania postanowienia kończącego postępowanie w przedmiocie środków tymczasowych.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Trybunał"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisja/Polska"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Trybunał"->"Komisja/Polska"[label="Postanowieniem z dnia 19 października 2018 r."];
  "Komisja/Polska"->"tymczasowo uwzględnił ten ostatni wniosek do czasu wydania postanowienia kończącego postępowanie w przedmiocie środków tymczasowych.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Por Despacho de 19 de outubro de 2018, Comissão/Polónia (C‑619/18 R, não publicado, EU:C:2018:852), a vice‑presidente do Tribunal de Justiça deferiu provisoriamente este último pedido até à prolação do despacho que poria termo ao processo de medidas provisórias.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal de Justiça"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comissão/Polónia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Tribunal de Justiça"->"Comissão/Polónia"[label="Despacho de 19 de outubro de 2018"];
  "Comissão/Polónia"->"Deferiu provisoriamente este último pedido até à prolação do despacho que poria termo ao processo de medidas provisórias.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Prin Ordonanța din 19 octombrie 2018, Comisia/Polonia (C‑619/18 R, nepublicată, EU:C:2018:852), vicepreședinta Curții a admis în mod provizoriu această ultimă cerere până la adoptarea ordonanței care urma să finalizeze procedura privind măsurile provizorii.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Curții"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comisia/Polonia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Curții"->"Comisia/Polonia"[label="Ordonanța din 19 octombrie 2018"];
  "Comisia/Polonia"->"a admis în mod provizoriu această ultimă cerere până la adoptarea ordonanței care urma să finalizeze procedura privind măsurile provizorii.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Uznesením z 19. októbra 2018, Komisia/Poľsko (C‑619/18 R, neuverejnené, EU:C:2018:852), podpredsedníčka Súdneho dvora predbežne vyhovela tomuto návrhu až do prijatia uznesenia, ktorým sa skončí konanie o nariadení predbežných opatrení.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Súdneho dvora"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisia/Poľsko"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Súdneho dvora"->"Komisia/Poľsko"[label="Uznesením z 19. októbra 2018"];
  "Komisia/Poľsko"->"predbežne vyhovela tomuto návrhu až do prijatia uznesenia, ktorým sa skončí konanie o nariadení predbežných opatrení.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Podpredsednica Sodišča je s sklepom z dne 19. oktobra 2018, Komisija/Poljska (C‑619/18 R, neobjavljen, EU:C:2018:852), začasno ugodila zadnjenavedenemu predlogu do izdaje sklepa, s katerim bo končan postopek za izdajo začasne odredbe.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Sodišča"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisija/Poljska"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Sodišča"->"Komisija/Poljska"[label="sklepom z dne 19. oktobra 2018"];
  "Komisija/Poljska"->"Začasno ugodila zadnjenavedenemu predlogu do izdaje sklepa, s katerim bo končan postopek za izdajo začasne odredbe.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Unionin tuomioistuimen varapresidentti hyväksyi 19.10.2018 antamallaan määräyksellä komissio v. Puola (C‑619/18 R, ei julkaistu, EU:C:2018:852) viimeksi mainitun pyynnön väliaikaisesti siihen saakka, kunnes annetaan määräys, jolla välitoimimenettely päätetään.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Unionin tuomioistuimen varapresidentti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "komissio v. Puola"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Unionin tuomioistuimen varapresidentti"->"komissio v. Puola"[label="19.10.2018"];
  "komissio v. Puola"->"viimeksi mainitun pyynnön väliaikaisesti siihen saakka, kunnes annetaan määräys, jolla välitoimimenettely päätetään.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Genom beslut av den 19 oktober 2018, kommissionen/Polen (C‑619/18 R, ej publicerat, EU:C:2018:852) biföll domstolens vice ordförande interimistiskt sistnämnda yrkande i avvaktan på antagandet av det beslut som skulle avsluta det interimistiska förfarandet.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "domstolens"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "kommissionen/Polen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "domstolens"->"kommissionen/Polen"[label="19 oktober 2018"];
  "kommissionen/Polen"->"biföll domstolens vice ordförande interimistiskt sistnämnda yrkande i avvaktan på antagandet av det beslut som skulle avsluta det interimistiska förfarandet.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: English

On 23 October 2018, the Vice-President of the Court, in accordance with Article 161(1) of the Rules of Procedure, referred the application for interim measures to the Court which, having regard to its importance, assigned it to the Grand Chamber in accordance with Article 60(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Vice-President of the Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The Court of Justice"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Article 60(1) of the Rules of Procedure"[shape=trapezium];
   "Article 161(1) of the Rules of Procedure"[shape=trapezium];
    

   "The Vice-President of the Court"->"Application for interim measures 23/10/2018";
   "Application for interim measures 23/10/2018"->"The Court of Justice";
   "Application for interim measures 23/10/2018"->"Article 60(1) of the Rules of Procedure"[dir=none];
   "Application for interim measures 23/10/2018"->"Article 161(1) of the Rules of Procedure"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 23 октомври 2018 г. на основание на член 161, параграф 1 от Процедурния правилник заместник-председателят на Съда отнася молбата пред Съда, който предвид нейното значение я разпределя на голям състав в съответствие с член 60, параграф 1 от този правилник.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "заместник-председателят на Съда"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Съда"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "член 60, параграф 1 от този правилник."[shape=trapezium];
  "член 161, параграф 1 от Процедурния правилник"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "заместник-председателят на Съда"->"молбата 23/10/2018";
  "молбата 23/10/2018"->"Съда";
  "молбата 23/10/2018"->"член 60, параграф 1 от този правилник."[dir=none];
  "молбата 23/10/2018"->"член 161, параграф 1 от Процедурния правилник"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 23 de octubre de 2018, la Vicepresidenta del Tribunal de Justicia, con arreglo a lo dispuesto en el artículo 161, apartado 1, del Reglamento de Procedimiento, dio traslado de la demanda sobre medidas provisionales al Tribunal de Justicia, que, en vista de su importancia, la atribuyó a la Gran Sala, conforme al artículo 60, apartado 1, del Reglamento de Procedimiento.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la Vicepresidenta del Tribunal de Justicia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "el Tribunal de Justicia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artículo 60, apartado 1, del Reglamento de Procedimiento"[shape=trapezium];
  "artículo 161, apartado 1, del Reglamento de Procedimiento"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "la Vicepresidenta del Tribunal de Justicia"->"demanda sobre medidas provisionales 23/10/2018";
  "demanda sobre medidas provisionales 23/10/2018"->"el Tribunal de Justicia";
  "demanda sobre medidas provisionales 23/10/2018"->"artículo 60, apartado 1, del Reglamento de Procedimiento"[dir=none];
  "demanda sobre medidas provisionales 23/10/2018"->"artículo 161, apartado 1, del Reglamento de Procedimiento"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dne 23. října 2018 místopředsedkyně Soudního dvora v souladu s čl. 161 odst. 1 jednacího řádu předala tento návrh k rozhodnutí Soudnímu dvoru, který jej s ohledem na jeho význam přidělil v souladu s čl. 60 odst. 1 jednacího řádu k rozhodnutí velkému senátu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "místopředsedkyně Soudního dvora"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Soudního dvora"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "čl. 60 odst. 1 jednacího řádu"[shape=trapezium];
  "čl. 161 odst. 1 jednacího řádu"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "místopředsedkyně Soudního dvora"->"Návrh na vydání předběžného opatření 23/10/2018";
  "Návrh na vydání předběžného opatření 23/10/2018"->"Soudního dvora";
  "Návrh na vydání předběžného opatření 23/10/2018"->"čl. 60 odst. 1 jednacího řádu"[dir=none];
  "Návrh na vydání předběžného opatření 23/10/2018"->"čl. 161 odst. 1 jednacího řádu"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den 23. oktober 2018 henviste Domstolens vicepræsident i henhold til procesreglementets artikel 161, stk. 1, anmodningen om foreløbige forholdsregler til Domstolen, som, henset til betydningen heraf, henviste sagen til Store Afdeling, jf. procesreglementets artikel 60, stk. 1.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Domstolens vicepræsident"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Domstolen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "procesreglementets artikel 60, stk. 1."[shape=trapezium];
  "procesreglementets artikel 161, stk. 1"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "Domstolens vicepræsident"->"anmodningen om foreløbige forholdsregler 23/10/2018";
  "anmodningen om foreløbige forholdsregler 23/10/2018"->"Domstolen";
  "anmodningen om foreløbige forholdsregler 23/10/2018"->"procesreglementets artikel 60, stk. 1."[dir=none];
  "anmodningen om foreløbige forholdsregler 23/10/2018"->"procesreglementets artikel 161, stk. 1"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: German

Am 23. Oktober 2018 hat die Vizepräsidentin des Gerichtshofs das Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes gemäß Art. 161 Abs. 1 der Verfahrensordnung dem Gerichtshof übertragen, der es in Anbetracht seiner Bedeutung gemäß Art. 60 Abs. 1 der Verfahrensordnung an die Große Kammer verwiesen hat.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "die Vizepräsidentin des Gerichtshofs"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "der Gerichtshof"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Art. 60 Abs. 1 der Verfahrensordnung"[shape=trapezium];
  "Art. 161 Abs. 1 der Verfahrensordnung"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "die Vizepräsidentin des Gerichtshofs"->"Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes 23/10/2018";
  "Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes 23/10/2018"->"der Gerichtshof";
  "Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes 23/10/2018"->"Art. 60 Abs. 1 der Verfahrensordnung"[dir=none];
  "Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes 23/10/2018"->"Art. 161 Abs. 1 der Verfahrensordnung"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Euroopa Kohtu asepresident andis 23. oktoobril 2018 kodukorra artikli 161 lõike 1 alusel selle taotluse lahendamiseks Euroopa Kohtule, kes taotluse tähtsust arvestades määras selle kodukorra artikli 60 lõike 1 alusel suurkojale.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Euroopa Kohtu asepresident"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Euroopa Kohtu"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "kodukorra artikli 60 lõike 1"[shape=trapezium];
  "kodukorra artikli 161 lõike 1"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "Euroopa Kohtu asepresident"->"selle taotluse lahendamiseks 23/10/2018";
  "selle taotluse lahendamiseks 23/10/2018"->"Euroopa Kohtu";
  "selle taotluse lahendamiseks 23/10/2018"->"kodukorra artikli 60 lõike 1"[dir=none];
  "selle taotluse lahendamiseks 23/10/2018"->"kodukorra artikli 161 lõike 1"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 23 Οκτωβρίου 2018 η Αντιπρόεδρος του Δικαστηρίου, κατ’ εφαρμογήν του άρθρου 161, παράγραφος 1, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας, παρέπεμψε την αίτηση αυτή στο Δικαστήριο το οποίο, λαμβάνοντας υπόψη τη σημασία της, την ανέθεσε στο τμήμα μείζονος συνθέσεως, σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 60, παράγραφος 1, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "η Αντιπρόεδρος του Δικαστηρίου"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "το Δικαστήριο"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "το άρθρο 60, παράγραφος 1, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας"[shape=trapezium];
  "του άρθρου 161, παράγραφος 1, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "η Αντιπρόεδρος του Δικαστηρίου"->"αίτηση αυτή 23/10/2018";
  "αίτηση αυτή 23/10/2018"->"το Δικαστήριο";
  "αίτηση αυτή 23/10/2018"->"το άρθρο 60, παράγραφος 1, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας"[dir=none];
  "αίτηση αυτή 23/10/2018"->"του άρθρου 161, παράγραφος 1, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: French

Le 23 octobre 2018, la vice-présidente de la Cour a, en application de l’article 161, paragraphe 1, du règlement de procédure, déféré cette demande à la Cour qui, compte tenu de l’importance de ladite demande, a attribué son traitement à la grande chambre, conformément à l’article 60, paragraphe 1, de ce règlement.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la vice-présidente de la Cour"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la Cour"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l’article 60, paragraphe 1, du règlement de procédure"[shape=trapezium];
  "l’article 161, paragraphe 1, du règlement de procédure"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "la vice-présidente de la Cour"->"Demande de mesures provisoires 23/10/2018";
  "Demande de mesures provisoires 23/10/2018"->"la Cour";
  "Demande de mesures provisoires 23/10/2018"->"l’article 60, paragraphe 1, du règlement de procédure"[dir=none];
  "Demande de mesures provisoires 23/10/2018"->"l’article 161, paragraphe 1, du règlement de procédure"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Potpredsjednica Suda je 23. listopada 2018., primjenom članka 161. stavka 1. Poslovnika, uputila taj zahtjev Sudu koji je, uzimajući u obzir njegovu važnost, dodijelio predmet velikom vijeću, u skladu s člankom 60. stavkom 1. tog poslovnika.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Potpredsjednica Suda"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sud"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "člankom 60. stavkom 1. tog poslovnika."[shape=trapezium];
  "članka 161. stavka 1. Poslovnika"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "Potpredsjednica Suda"->"taj zahtjev 23/10/2018";
  "taj zahtjev 23/10/2018"->"Sud";
  "taj zahtjev 23/10/2018"->"člankom 60. stavkom 1. tog poslovnika."[dir=none];
  "taj zahtjev 23/10/2018"->"članka 161. stavka 1. Poslovnika"[dir=none];
    
}