mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Danish

Ved dom afsagt efter kontradiktorisk sagsbehandling af hof van beroep te Antwerpen (appeldomstolen i Antwerpen) den 1. februar 2013 blev IK, som er belgisk statsborger, idømt en hovedstraf på tre års fængsel for blufærdighedskrænkelse uden anvendelse af vold eller trusler begået mod en mindreårig person under 16 år (herefter »hovedstraffen«). Ved samme dom og for samme lovovertrædelse blev han desuden som tillægsstraf undergivet tilsyn ved strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (ret i sager vedrørende strafafsoning) i en periode på ti år (herefter »tillægsstraffen«). I henhold til belgisk ret påbegyndes denne straf ved udløbet af hovedstraffen, og med henblik på fuldbyrdelsen heraf afgør strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (ret i sager vedrørende strafafsoning) inden udløbet af hovedstraffen, om den tilsynsdømte skal frihedsberøves eller være underlagt tilsyn uden frihedsberøvelse.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen appeldomstolen i Antwerpen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen appeldomstolen i Antwerpen"->"1. februar 2013";
  "1. februar 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"en hovedstraf på tre års fængsel for blufærdighedskrænkelse uden anvendelse af vold eller trusler begået mod en mindreårig person under 16 år (herefter »hovedstraffen«)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: German

Durch ein im kontradiktorischen Verfahren erlassenes Urteil des Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Berufungsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien) vom 1. Februar 2013 wurde IK, ein belgischer Staatsangehöriger, zu einer Hauptfreiheitsstrafe von drei Jahren wegen eines ohne Gewaltanwendung oder Drohung begangenen sexuellen Übergriffs gegenüber einer Minderjährigen unter 16 Jahren verurteilt (im Folgenden: Hauptstrafe). Mit demselben Urteil wurde er für dieselbe Tat außerdem als zusätzliche Strafe für einen Zeitraum von zehn Jahren an die Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Strafvollstreckungsgericht) überantwortet (im Folgenden: zusätzliche Strafe). Nach belgischem Recht beginnt diese Strafe nach Ablauf der Hauptstrafe. Die Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Strafvollstreckungsgericht) entscheidet zu Vollstreckungszwecken vor Ablauf dieser Hauptstrafe, ob dem überantworteten Verurteilten die Freiheit entzogen wird oder ob er unter Aufsicht freigelassen wird.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Berufungsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Berufungsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien)"->"Urteil des Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Berufungsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien) vom 1. Februar 2013";
  "Urteil des Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Berufungsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien) vom 1. Februar 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"eine Hauptfreiheitsstrafe von drei Jahren wegen eines ohne Gewaltanwendung oder Drohung begangenen sexuellen Übergriffs gegenüber einer Minderjährigen unter 16 Jahren (im Folgenden: Hauptstrafe)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Estonian

Võistlevas menetluses hof van beroep te Antwerpeni (Antwerpeni apellatsioonikohus, Belgia) 1. veebruaril 2013 tehtud kohtuotsusega määrati Belgia kodanikule IK‑le põhikaristusena kolmeaastane vangistus sugulise iseloomuga teo eest, mis pandi toime ilma vägivalla või ähvardamiseta noorema kui 16aastase alaealise isiku suhtes (edaspidi „põhikaristus“). Sama kohtuotsusega anti ta sama süüteo eest lisakaristusena ka kümneks aastaks strafuitvoeringsrechtbanki (täitmiskohus) järelevalve alla (edaspidi „lisakaristus“). Belgia õiguse kohaselt algab selle karistuse täitmine põhikaristuse täitmise lõppemisel ja selle täitmiseks otsustab strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (täitmiskohus) enne põhikaristuse lõppemist, kas võtta järelevalve alla antud süüdimõistetult vabadus või vabastada ta käitumiskontrollile allutades.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Antwerpeni apellatsioonikohus, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Antwerpeni apellatsioonikohus, Belgia)"->"1. veebruaril 2013 tehtud kohtuotsusega";
  "1. veebruaril 2013 tehtud kohtuotsusega"->"IK";
  "IK"->"põhikaristusena kolmeaastane vangistus sugulise iseloomuga teo eest, mis pandi toime ilma vägivalla või ähvardamiseta noorema kui 16aastase alaealise isiku suhtes (edaspidi „põhikaristus“)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Greek

Με κατ’ αντιμωλία απόφαση του hof van beroep te Antwerpen (εφετείου Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο), της 1ης Φεβρουαρίου 2013, ο ΙΚ, Βέλγος υπήκοος, καταδικάστηκε σε κύρια ποινή φυλάκισης τριών ετών λόγω προσβολής της γενετήσιας αξιοπρέπειας ανηλίκου κάτω των δεκαέξι ετών χωρίς τη χρήση βίας ή απειλών (στο εξής: κύρια ποινή). Επιπλέον, με την ίδια απόφαση και για την ίδια αξιόποινη πράξη, ως παρεπόμενη ποινή, τέθηκε στη διάθεση του strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (αρμόδιου για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστηρίου) για διάρκεια δέκα ετών (στο εξής: παρεπόμενη ποινή). Κατά το βελγικό δίκαιο, η ποινή αυτή αρχίζει να εκτίεται μετά τη λήξη της κύριας ποινής και, για την εκτέλεσή της, το strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο) αποφασίζει, πριν από τη λήξη της κύριας ποινής, είτε τη στέρηση της ελευθερίας είτε την υπό επιτήρηση ελευθέρωση του τεθέντος στη διάθεση του δικαστηρίου αυτού.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen εφετείου Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen εφετείου Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο"->"1ης Φεβρουαρίου 2013";
  "1ης Φεβρουαρίου 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"κύρια ποινή φυλάκισης τριών ετών λόγω προσβολής της γενετήσιας αξιοπρέπειας ανηλίκου κάτω των δεκαέξι ετών χωρίς τη χρήση βίας ή απειλών (στο εξής: κύρια ποινή)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: French

Par arrêt contradictoire du hof van beroep te Antwerpen (cour d’appel d’Anvers, Belgique), du 1er février 2013, IK, un ressortissant belge, a été condamné à une peine principale de trois ans d’emprisonnement du chef d’attentat à la pudeur commis sans violences ni menaces à l’encontre d’un mineur âgé de moins de seize ans (ci-après la « peine principale »). Par le même arrêt, et pour cette même infraction, il a en outre été, à titre de peine complémentaire, mis à disposition du strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (tribunal de l’application des peines) pour une durée de dix ans (ci-après la « peine complémentaire »). Conformément au droit belge, cette peine prend cours à l’expiration de la peine principale et, aux fins de son exécution, le strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (tribunal de l’application des peines) décide, préalablement à l’expiration de cette peine principale, soit de priver de liberté, soit de libérer sous surveillance le condamné mis à disposition.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen cour d’appel d’Anvers, Belgique"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen cour d’appel d’Anvers, Belgique"->"1er février 2013";
  "1er février 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"une peine principale de trois ans d’emprisonnement du chef d’attentat à la pudeur commis sans violences ni menaces à l’encontre d’un mineur âgé de moins de seize ans (ci-après la « peine principale »)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Croatian

Presudom koju je hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Žalbeni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija) donio 1. veljače 2013. u kontradiktornom postupku osoba IK, belgijski državljanin, osuđena je na glavnu kaznu od tri godine zatvora zbog kaznenog djela nenasilne i neprisilne spolne zlouporabe djeteta mlađeg od šesnaest godina (u daljnjem tekstu: glavna kazna). Toj je osobi istom presudom za isto kazneno djelo izrečena dodatna kazna upućivanja strafuitvoeringsrechtbanku (Sud izvršenja kazne) u trajanju od deset godina (u daljnjem tekstu: dodatna kazna). U skladu s belgijskim pravom, ta kazna stupa na snagu nakon isteka glavne kazne i, u svrhu njezina izvršenja, strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Sud izvršenja kazne) prije isteka spomenute glavne kazne odlučuje hoće li osuđeniku kojemu je izrečena dodatna kazna upućivanja oduzeti slobodu ili ga pustiti na slobodu uz nadzor.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Žalbeni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Žalbeni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija)"->"Presudom koju je hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Žalbeni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija) donio 1. veljače 2013.";
  "Presudom koju je hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Žalbeni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija) donio 1. veljače 2013."->"IK";
  "IK"->"Primarna zatvorska kazna od tri godine za seksualni napad na maloljetnika mlađeg od 16 godina bez nasilja ili prijetnje (‘primarna kazna’)."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Italian

Con sentenza pronunciata in contraddittorio dallo hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Corte d’appello di Anversa, Belgio), del 1o febbraio 2013, IK, un cittadino belga, è stato condannato a una pena principale di tre anni di reclusione per un reato di attentato al pudore commesso senza violenza né minacce nei confronti di una persona minorenne di età inferiore a sedici anni (in prosieguo: la «pena principale»). Con la stessa sentenza e per il medesimo reato egli è stato inoltre messo a disposizione dello strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (tribunale dell’esecuzione penale), a titolo di pena accessoria, per un periodo di dieci anni (in prosieguo: la «pena accessoria»). Conformemente al diritto belga, tale pena ha inizio alla scadenza della pena principale e, ai fini della sua esecuzione, lo strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (tribunale dell’esecuzione penale) decide, prima della scadenza di tale pena principale, o la privazione della libertà, o la liberazione sotto sorveglianza, del condannato messo a disposizione.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Corte d’appello di Anversa, Belgio)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Corte d’appello di Anversa, Belgio)"->"sentenza pronunciata [...] del 1o febbraio 2013";
  "sentenza pronunciata [...] del 1o febbraio 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"è stato condannato a una pena principale di tre anni di reclusione per un reato di attentato al pudore commesso senza violenza né minacce nei confronti di una persona minorenne di età inferiore a sedici anni (in prosieguo: la «pena principale»)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Latvian

Ar hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Antverpenes apelācijas tiesa, Beļģija) 2013. gada 1. februāra uz sacīkstes principu balstītā tiesvedībā pasludinātu spriedumu IK, Beļģijas valstspiederīgajam, tika piespriests trīs gadu brīvības atņemšanas pamatsods par seksuāla rakstura darbībām, nelietojot vardarbību vai draudus, pret nepilngadīgo, kas jaunāks par sešpadsmit gadiem (turpmāk tekstā – “pamatsods”). Ar šo pašu spriedumu un par šo pašu noziedzīgo nodarījumu kā papildsodu viņš uz desmit gadiem tika nodots strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Kriminālsodu izpildes tiesa) uzraudzībā (turpmāk tekstā – “papildsods”). Atbilstoši Beļģijas tiesībām šis sods sākas, beidzoties pamatsodam, un saistībā ar to strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Kriminālsodu izpildes tiesa) pirms šā pamatsoda termiņa beigām izlemj vai nu par Kriminālsodu izpildes tiesas uzraudzībā nodotā notiesātā brīvības atņemšanu, vai atbrīvošanu ar uzraudzību.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Antverpenes apelācijas tiesa, Beļģija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Antverpenes apelācijas tiesa, Beļģija)"->"2013. gada 1. februāra";
  "2013. gada 1. februāra"->"IK";
  "IK"->"Trīs gadu brīvības atņemšanas pamatsods par seksuāla rakstura darbībām, nelietojot vardarbību vai draudus, pret nepilngadīgo, kas jaunāks par sešpadsmit gadiem (turpmāk tekstā – “pamatsods”)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Lithuanian

2013 m. vasario 1 d.hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Antverpeno apeliacinis teismas, Belgija) per rungimosi principu grindžiamą procesą priimtu nuosprendžiu nuteisė Belgijos pilietį IK pagrindine trejų metų laisvės atėmimo bausme už jaunesnio nei šešiolikos metų nepilnamečio tvirkinimą, nenaudojant prievartos ir grasinimų (toliau – pagrindinė bausmė). Tuo pačiu nuosprendžiu už tą pačią nusikalstamą veiką jam buvo nustatyta papildoma bausmė, dėl kurios skyrimo dešimties metų laikotarpiui turėjo spręsti strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (bausmių skyrimo teismas) (toliau – papildoma bausmė). Pagal Belgijos teisę ši bausmė pradedama vykdyti pasibaigus pagrindinei bausmei ir tam, kad ji būtų įvykdyta, strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (bausmių skyrimo teismas) prieš baigiant vykdyti pagrindinę bausmę sprendžia, ar nuteistajam, kuriam buvo skirta tokia papildoma bausmė, toliau taikyti laisvės atėmimo bausmę, ar paleisti jį į laisvę ir vykdyti jo priežiūrą.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Antverpeno apeliacinis teismas, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Antverpeno apeliacinis teismas, Belgija)"->"2013 m. vasario 1 d.";
  "2013 m. vasario 1 d."->"IK";
  "IK"->"Pagrindinė trejų metų laisvės atėmimo bausmė už jaunesnio nei 16 metų amžiaus nepilnamečio seksualinį prievartavimą be smurto ar grasinimo (toliau - pagrindinė bausmė)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Hungarian

A hof van beroep te Antwerpen (antwerpeni fellebbviteli bíróság, Belgium) 2013. február 1‑jei kontradiktórius eljárásban hozott ítéletével IK‑t, egy belga állampolgárt három év szabadságvesztés főbüntetésre ítélte visszaesőként erőszak és fenyegetés nélkül tizenhat év alatti kiskorú sérelmére elkövetett szeméremsértés miatt (a továbbiakban: főbüntetés). Ugyanezen ítélet ugyanezen bűncselekmény miatt tízéves időtartamra mellékbüntetésként a strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (büntetés‑végrehajtási bíróság) mérlegelési jogkörében fogva tarthatónak nyilvánította IK‑t (a továbbiakban: mellékbüntetés). A belga jog értelmében e büntetés a főbüntetés leteltekor kezdődik, és a végrehajtása céljából a strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (a büntetés‑végrehajtási bíróság) – a főbüntetés leteltét megelőzően – dönt a fogva tarthatónak nyilvánítható elítélt szabadságelvonásáról vagy felügyelet melletti szabadságra bocsátásáról.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen antwerpeni fellebbviteli bíróság, Belgium"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen antwerpeni fellebbviteli bíróság, Belgium"->"2013. február 1‑jei kontradiktórius eljárásban hozott ítéletével";
  "2013. február 1‑jei kontradiktórius eljárásban hozott ítéletével"->"IK";
  "IK"->"Három év szabadságvesztés főbüntetésre ítélte visszaesőként erőszak és fenyegetés nélkül tizenhat év alatti kiskorú sérelmére elkövetett szeméremsértés miatt (a továbbiakban: főbüntetés)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Maltese

Permezz ta’ sentenza kontradittorja tal-hof van beroep te Antwerpen (il-Qorti tal-Appell ta’ Anvers, il-Belġju), tal-1 ta’ Frar 2013, IK, ċittadin Belġjan, ġie kkundannat għal piena prinċipali ta’ tliet snin ta’ priġunerija fuq l-akkuża ta’ attentat għall-pudur imwettaq mingħajr vjolenza jew theddid kontra minuri ta’ inqas minn sittax il-sena (iktar ’il quddiem il-“piena prinċipali”). Permezz tal-istess sentenza, u għal dan l-istess reat, huwa ġie barra minn hekk, bħala piena addizzjonali, imqiegħed għad-dispożizzjoni tas-strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (il-Qorti Penitenzjarja) għal perijodu ta’ għaxar snin (iktar ’il quddiem il-“piena addizzjonali”). Konformement għad-dritt Belġjan, din il-piena tibda tidekkorri hekk kif tintemm il-piena prinċipali u, għall-finijiet tal-eżekuzzjoni tagħha, l-istrafuitvoeringsrechtbank (il-Qorti Penitenzjarja) tiddeċiedi, qabel tintemm il-piena prinċipali, jew li ċċaħħad mil-libertà, jew li tillibera taħt sorveljanza lill-ikkundannat imqiegħed għad-dispożizzjoni.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (il-Qorti tal-Appell ta’ Anvers, il-Belġju)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (il-Qorti tal-Appell ta’ Anvers, il-Belġju)"->"1 ta’ Frar 2013";
  "1 ta’ Frar 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"Sentenza primarja ta' tlett snin ħabs għall-attakk sesswali fuq minorenni ta' taħt is-16-il sena mingħajr vjolenza jew theddida (‘is-sentenza primarja’)."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Dutch

Bij op tegenspraak gewezen arrest van 1 februari 2013 van het hof van beroep Antwerpen (België) werd IK, Belgisch staatsburger, veroordeeld tot een hoofdgevangenisstraf van drie jaar wegens aanranding van de eerbaarheid zonder geweld of bedreiging op een minderjarige jonger dan zestien jaar (hierna: „hoofdstraf”). Bij datzelfde arrest werd hij voor hetzelfde strafbare feit tevens ter beschikking gesteld van de strafuitvoeringsrechtbank voor een periode van tien jaar (hierna: „bijkomende straf”). Overeenkomstig het Belgische recht neemt deze straf een aanvang bij het verstrijken van de hoofdstraf en voor de uitvoering ervan beslist de strafuitvoeringsrechtbank voorafgaand aan het verstrijken van die hoofdstraf hetzij tot vrijheidsbeneming, hetzij tot invrijheidstelling onder toezicht van de ter beschikking gestelde veroordeelde.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen het hof van beroep Antwerpen (België)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen het hof van beroep Antwerpen (België)"->"arrest van 1 februari 2013";
  "arrest van 1 februari 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"een hoofdgevangenisstraf van drie jaar wegens aanranding van de eerbaarheid zonder geweld of bedreiging op een minderjarige jonger dan zestien jaar (hierna: „hoofdstraf”)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Polish

Wydanym w obecności stron wyrokiem hof van beroep te Antwerpen (sądu apelacyjnego w Antwerpii, Belgia) z dnia 1 lutego 2013 r. IK, obywatel belgijski, został skazany na karę zasadniczą trzech lat pozbawienia wolności za czyn polegający na wykorzystaniu seksualnym małoletniego poniżej 16 roku życia bez użycia przemocy lub groźby jej użycia. Tym samym wyrokiem i za to samo przestępstwo został on poza tym, tytułem kary dodatkowej, oddany do dyspozycji strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (sądu penitencjarnego) na okres dziesięciu lat (kara zwana dalej „kara dodatkową”). Zgodnie z prawem belgijskim kara ta rozpoczyna się po zakończeniu kary zasadniczej i do celów jej wykonania przed zakończeniem kary zasadniczej strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (sąd penitencjarny) orzeka albo o dalszym pozbawieniu wolności, albo o zwolnieniu oddanego do dyspozycji skazanego w warunkach dozoru.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (sądu apelacyjnego w Antwerpii, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (sądu apelacyjnego w Antwerpii, Belgia)"->"wyrokiem z dnia 1 lutego 2013 r.";
  "wyrokiem z dnia 1 lutego 2013 r."->"IK";
  "IK"->"Podstawowa kara pozbawienia wolności w wymiarze trzech lat za napaść na tle seksualnym na osobę małoletnią poniżej 16 roku życia bez użycia przemocy lub groźby („kara podstawowa”)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Portuguese

Por acórdão contraditório do hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Tribunal de Recurso de Antuérpia, Bélgica), de 1 de fevereiro de 2013, IK, nacional belga, foi condenado numa pena de prisão principal de três anos, por um crime de atentado ao pudor de um menor de menos de dezasseis anos, sem violência nem ameaças (a seguir «pena principal»). No mesmo acórdão, e pela mesma infração, foi ainda, a título de pena acessória, colocado à ordem do strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Tribunal de Execução das Penas), por um período de dez anos (a seguir «pena acessória»). Em conformidade com o direito belga, essa pena tem início após a extinção da pena principal e, para efeitos da sua execução, o strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Tribunal de Execução das Penas) decide, antes de extinta essa pena principal, se o condenado colocado à ordem do tribunal continua privado de liberdade ou fica em liberdade sob vigilância.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Tribunal de Recurso de Antuérpia, Bélgica)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Tribunal de Recurso de Antuérpia, Bélgica)"->"Por acórdão contraditório do hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Tribunal de Recurso de Antuérpia, Bélgica), de 1 de fevereiro de 2013";
  "Por acórdão contraditório do hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Tribunal de Recurso de Antuérpia, Bélgica), de 1 de fevereiro de 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"condenado numa pena de prisão principal de três anos, por um crime de atentado ao pudor de um menor de menos de dezasseis anos, sem violência nem ameaças (a seguir «pena principal»)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Romanian

Prin hotărârea hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Curtea de Apel din Antwerpen, Belgia) din 1 februarie 2013, pronunțată în cadrul unei proceduri contradictorii, IK, resortisant belgian, a fost condamnat la o pedeapsă principală de trei ani de închisoare pentru atentat la pudoare, fără violență sau amenințări, asupra unui minor cu vârsta sub 16 ani (denumită în continuare „pedeapsa principală”). De asemenea, prin aceeași hotărâre și pentru aceeași infracțiune, IK a fost pus la dispoziția strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Tribunalul pentru Aplicarea Pedepselor), ca pedeapsă complementară, pentru o perioadă de zece ani (denumită în continuare „pedeapsa complementară”). În conformitate cu dreptul belgian, această pedeapsă intră în vigoare după expirarea pedepsei principale și, în vederea executării sale, strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Tribunalul pentru Aplicarea Pedepselor) decide, înainte de expirarea acestei pedepse principale, fie privarea de libertate, fie liberarea sub supraveghere a condamnatului pus la dispoziție.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Curtea de Apel din Antwerpen, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Curtea de Apel din Antwerpen, Belgia)"->"hotărârea din 1 februarie 2013";
  "hotărârea din 1 februarie 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"a fost condamnat la o pedeapsă principală de trei ani de închisoare pentru atentat la pudoare, fără violență sau amenințări, asupra unui minor cu vârsta sub 16 ani (denumită în continuare „pedeapsa principală”)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Slovak

Kontradiktórnym rozsudkom Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Odvolací súd Antverpy, Belgicko) z 1. februára 2013 bol IK, belgický štátny príslušník, odsúdený na hlavný trest odňatia slobody vo výške troch rokov za sexuálne zneužitie maloletej osoby mladšej ako 16 rokov bez násilia a hrozieb (ďalej len „hlavný trest“). Za tento trestný čin mu bol tým istým rozsudkom ďalej uložený doplňujúci trest dohľadu uskutočňovaný strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (súd pre výkon trestov) v trvaní desať rokov (ďalej len „doplňujúci trest“). Podľa belgického práva začína tento trest plynúť po skončení hlavného trestu a strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (súd pre výkon trestov) pred uplynutím tohto hlavného trestu rozhodne buď o pozbavení osobnej slobody odsúdeného k trestu dohľadu, alebo o jeho prepustení s ochranným dohľadom.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Odvolací súd Antverpy, Belgicko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Odvolací súd Antverpy, Belgicko)"->"1. februára 2013";
  "1. februára 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"Hlavný trest odňatia slobody vo výške troch rokov za sexuálne zneužitie maloletej osoby mladšej ako 16 rokov bez násilia a hrozieb (ďalej len „hlavný trest“)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Slovenian

S sodbo hof van Beroep te Antwerpen (višje sodišče v Antwerpnu, Belgija) z dne 1. februarja 2013, izdano v kontradiktornem postopku, je bila oseba IK, belgijski državljan, obsojena na glavno kazen treh let zapora zaradi kaznivega dejanja napada na spolno nedotakljivost mladoletnika, mlajšega od 16 let, brez uporabe nasilja ali grožnje (v nadaljevanju: glavna kazen). Z isto sodbo ji je bila za to kaznivo dejanje izrečena tudi dodatna kazen, izročitev v obravnavo strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (sodišče, pristojno za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij), v trajanju deset let (v nadaljevanju: dodatna kazen). V skladu z belgijskim pravom ta kazen nastopi, ko se izteče glavna kazen in za njeno izvršitev strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (sodišče, pristojno za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij) pred iztekom prestajanja te glavne kazni odloči bodisi o odvzemu prostosti bodisi o pogojnem odpustu obsojenca, izročenega v obravnavo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (višje sodišče v Antwerpnu, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (višje sodišče v Antwerpnu, Belgija)"->"Sodbo z dne 1. februarja 2013";
  "Sodbo z dne 1. februarja 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"glavno kazen treh let zapora zaradi kaznivega dejanja napada na spolno nedotakljivost mladoletnika, mlajšega od 16 let, brez uporabe nasilja ali grožnje (v nadaljevanju: glavna kazen)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Finnish

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Antwerpenin ylioikeus, Belgia) tuomitsi IK:n, joka on Belgian kansalainen, kontradiktorisessa menettelyssä 1.2.2013 annetulla tuomiolla päärangaistukseen, joka oli kolme vuotta vankeutta ilman väkivaltaa tai uhkausta tehdystä alle 16-vuotiaan alaikäisen seksuaalisesta hyväksikäytöstä (jäljempänä päärangaistus). Hänet määrättiin tästä teosta samassa tuomiossa oheisseuraamukseen eli rangaistusten täytäntöönpanotuomioistuimen (strafuitvoeringsrechtbank) valvontaan kymmeneksi vuodeksi (jäljempänä oheisseuraamus). Belgian lainsäädännön mukaan tämä rangaistus alkaa päärangaistuksen päätyttyä ja strafuitvoeringsrechtbank päättää sen täytäntöönpanoa varten ennen päärangaistuksen päättymistä joko vapaudenriistosta tai tuomitun vapauttamisesta valvonnan alaisena.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen Antwerpenin ylioikeus, Belgia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen Antwerpenin ylioikeus, Belgia"->"1.2.2013 annetulla tuomiolla";
  "1.2.2013 annetulla tuomiolla"->"IK";
  "IK"->"Päärangaistukseen, joka oli kolme vuotta vankeutta ilman väkivaltaa tai uhkausta tehdystä alle 16-vuotiaan alaikäisen seksuaalisesta hyväksikäytöstä (jäljempänä päärangaistus)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Swedish

Genom dom av den 1 februari 2013 av Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Appellationsdomstolen i Antwerpen, Belgien) dömdes IK, som är belgisk medborgare, till tre års fängelse för sexuellt utnyttjande, utan våld eller hot, mot en underårig yngre än 16 år (nedan kallat det huvudsakliga straffet). Genom denna dom, och med anledning av samma brott, beslutade rätten också att han skulle stå till förfogande för strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (domstolen för straffverkställighet) under tio år (nedan kallat den kompletterande påföljden). Enligt belgisk rätt inträffar den påföljden när det huvudsakliga straffet har avtjänats. Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (domstolen för straffverkställighet) beslutar, innan det huvudsakliga straffet har avtjänats helt, om antingen frihetsberövande eller frigivning under övervakning för den dömde.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Appellationsdomstolen i Antwerpen, Belgien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Appellationsdomstolen i Antwerpen, Belgien)"->"dom av den 1 februari 2013";
  "dom av den 1 februari 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"En primär frihetsberövande påföljd på tre år för sexuella övergrepp på en minderårig under 16 år utan våld eller hot (”den primära påföljden”)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: English

Since IK had left Belgium, on 27 August 2014, the Belgian issuing judicial authority issued a European arrest warrant against him for enforcement of the sentence. The European arrest warrant indicated the main sentence, the nature and legal classification of the offences and the relevant legal provisions, and set out an outline of the facts. No mention was made of the additional sentence imposed on IK.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "Belgian issuing judicial authority"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "European arrest warrant"[shape=trapezium];

   "Belgian issuing judicial authority"->"Issue 27/08/2014";
   "Issue 27/08/2014"->"European arrest warrant";
   "European arrest warrant"->"No mention was made of the additional sentence imposed on IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Bulgarian

След като IK напуска Белгия, на 27 август 2014 г. компетентният белгийски съдебен орган издава европейска заповед за арест по отношение на това лице с оглед изпълнението на наказанието. Европейската заповед за арест съдържа данни за основното наказание, за характера и правната квалификация на престъпленията, както и за приложимите правни норми, а също и изложение на фактите. В нея не се упоменава допълващото наказание, също наложено на това лице.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "компетентният белгийски съдебен орган"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "европейска заповед за арест"[shape=trapezium];

  "компетентният белгийски съдебен орган"->"27 август 2014 г.";
  "27 август 2014 г."->"европейска заповед за арест";
  "европейска заповед за арест"->"В нея не се упоменава допълващото наказание, също наложено на това лице. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Spanish

Al haber abandonado IK Bélgica, la autoridad judicial emisora belga competente emitió, el 27 de agosto de 2014, una orden de detención europea contra él para la ejecución de la pena. La orden de detención europea mencionaba la pena principal, la naturaleza y la tipificación jurídica de los delitos y las disposiciones legales aplicables, y contenía una exposición de los hechos. No indicaba la pena accesoria a la que también había sido condenado el interesado.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la autoridad judicial emisora belga"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "orden de detención europea"[shape=trapezium];

  "la autoridad judicial emisora belga"->"el 27 de agosto de 2014";
  "el 27 de agosto de 2014"->"orden de detención europea";
  "orden de detención europea"->"No indicaba la pena accesoria a la que también había sido condenado el interesado. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Czech

Vzhledem k tomu, že IK opustil Belgii, vydal příslušný belgický vystavující justiční orgán proti této osobě dne 27. srpna 2014 evropský zatýkací rozkaz za účelem dodání do výkonu trestu. Evropský zatýkací rozkaz uváděl hlavní trest, povahu a právní kvalifikaci trestných činů, jakož i použitelná právní ustanovení, a obsahoval shrnutí skutkového stavu. Neuváděl však doplňující trest, který byl dotčené osobě rovněž uložen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "příslušný belgický vystavující justiční orgán"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "evropský zatýkací rozkaz"[shape=trapezium];

  "příslušný belgický vystavující justiční orgán"->"27. srpna 2014";
  "27. srpna 2014"->"evropský zatýkací rozkaz";
  "evropský zatýkací rozkaz"->"Neuváděl však doplňující trest, který byl dotčené osobě rovněž uložen. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Danish

Da IK havde forladt Belgien, udstedte den kompetente udstedende judicielle myndighed i Belgien den 27. august 2014 en europæisk arrestordre mod IK med henblik på fuldbyrdelse af straffen. I den europæiske arrestordre var hovedstraffen, lovovertrædelsens karakter og retlige beskrivelse samt de gældende lovbestemmelser angivet, ligesom den indeholdt en beskrivelse af de faktiske omstændigheder. Den tillægsstraf, som den pågældende også var blevet idømt, blev ikke nævnt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "den kompetente udstedende judicielle myndighed i Belgien"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europæisk arrestordre"[shape=trapezium];

  "den kompetente udstedende judicielle myndighed i Belgien"->"den 27. august 2014";
  "den 27. august 2014"->"europæisk arrestordre";
  "europæisk arrestordre"->"Den tillægsstraf, som den pågældende også var blevet idømt, blev ikke nævnt. IK."[dir=none];
    
}