mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Greek

Οι εκκαλούντες της κύριας δίκης άσκησαν έφεση κατά της απόφασης αυτής ενώπιον του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Οι εκκαλούντες"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Οι εκκαλούντες"->"του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου"[label="έφεση"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: French

Les requérants au principal ont interjeté appel de cette décision devant la juridiction de renvoi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Les requérants au principal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la juridiction de renvoi"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Les requérants au principal"->"la juridiction de renvoi"[label="interjeté appel"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Croatian

Tužitelji u glavnom postupku podnijeli su žalbu protiv te odluke sudu koji je uputio zahtjev.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tužitelji"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sudu koji je uputio zahtjev"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Tužitelji"->"sudu koji je uputio zahtjev"[label="žalbu"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Italian

I ricorrenti nel procedimento principale hanno proposto appello avverso la succitata sentenza dinanzi al giudice del rinvio.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "I ricorrenti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "il giudice del rinvio"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "I ricorrenti"->"il giudice del rinvio"[label="hanno proposto appello"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Latvian

Prasītāji pamatlietā par šo nolēmumu iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību iesniedzējtiesā.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Prasītāji"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "iesniedzējtiesā"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Prasītāji"->"iesniedzējtiesā"[label="apelācijas sūdzību"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Lithuanian

Ieškovai pagrindinėje byloje dėl šio sprendimo pateikė apeliacinį skundą prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikusiam teismui.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Ieškovai"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "pateikusiam teismui"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Ieškovai"->"pateikusiam teismui"[label="apeliacinį skundą"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Hungarian

Az alapeljárás felperesei fellebbezést nyújtottak be e határozat ellen a kérdést előterjesztő bíróságnál.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "felperesei"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "a kérdést előterjesztő bíróságnál"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "felperesei"->"a kérdést előterjesztő bíróságnál"[label="fellebbezést"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Maltese

Ir-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali appellaw minn din id-deċiżjoni quddiem il-qorti tar-rinviju.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Ir-rikorrenti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Il-qorti tar-rinviju"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Ir-rikorrenti"->"Il-qorti tar-rinviju"[label="appellaw"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Dutch

Tegen die beschikking hebben verzoekers in het hoofdgeding hoger beroep ingesteld bij de verwijzende rechter.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "verzoekers"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de verwijzende rechter"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "verzoekers"->"de verwijzende rechter"[label="hoger beroep"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Polish

Powodowie w postępowaniu głównym wnieśli apelację od tego orzeczenia do sądu odsyłającego.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Powodowie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sądu odsyłającego"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Powodowie"->"sądu odsyłającego"[label="apelację"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Portuguese

Os recorrentes no processo principal interpuseram recurso dessa decisão para o órgão jurisdicional de reenvio.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Os recorrentes"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "o órgão jurisdicional de reenvio"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Os recorrentes"->"o órgão jurisdicional de reenvio"[label="recurso"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Romanian

Reclamanții din litigiul principal au formulat apel împotriva acestei decizii la instanța de trimitere.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Reclamanții"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "instanța de trimitere"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Reclamanții"->"instanța de trimitere"[label="apel"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Slovak

Navrhovatelia vo veci samej sa proti tomuto rozhodnutiu odvolali na vnútroštátny súd, ktorý podal návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Navrhovatelia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "vnútroštátny súd"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Navrhovatelia"->"vnútroštátny súd"[label="odvolali"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Slovenian

Pritožniki iz postopka v glavni stvari so zoper navedeno odločbo vložili pritožbo pri predložitvenem sodišču.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Pritožniki"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "predložitvenem sodišču."[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Pritožniki"->"predložitvenem sodišču."[label="pritožbo"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Finnish

Pääasian hakijat valittivat tästä päätöksestä ennakkoratkaisua pyytäneeseen tuomioistuimeen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Pääasian hakijat"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ennakkoratkaisua pyytäneeseen tuomioistuimeen"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Pääasian hakijat"->"ennakkoratkaisua pyytäneeseen tuomioistuimeen"[label="valittivat"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Swedish

Kärandena överklagade beslutet till den hänskjutande domstolen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Kärandena"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "den hänskjutande domstolen"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Kärandena"->"den hänskjutande domstolen"[label="överklagade"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: English

By order of 21 September 2018, the referring court allowed the appeal against the decision of the Lord Ordinary and granted the request of the petitioners in the main proceedings that a reference for a preliminary ruling be made under Article 267 TFEU. The referring court considers that it is neither academic nor premature to ask the Court of Justice whether it is legally possible, for a Member State, to revoke unilaterally the notification made under Article 50(2) TEU and to remain in the European Union. It considers that the matter is uncertain and that the answer given by the Court of Justice will have the effect of clarifying the options open to the Members of the House of Commons when they cast their votes on any agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union. In particular, that answer would allow them to ascertain whether there are not two options, but three, namely withdrawal from the European Union without an agreement, withdrawal from the European Union with the agreement that has been laid before them, or revocation of the notification of the intention to withdraw and the United Kingdom’s remaining in the European Union.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "Applicants"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The referring court"[shape=doubleoctagon];


   "The referring court"->"Order 21/09/2018";
   "Order 21/09/2018"->"Applicants";
   "Order 21/09/2018"->"Allow the appeak against the decision of the Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Bulgarian

С определение от 21 септември 2018 г. запитващата юрисдикция уважава жалбата против решението на Lord Ordinary (първоинстанционен състав от един съдия) и уважава искането на жалбоподателите в главното производство за отправяне на преюдициално запитване на основание член 267 ДФЕС. Запитващата юрисдикция приема, че нито е академично, нито преждевременно да се отправи запитване до Съда дали държавата членка има правна възможност едностранно да оттегли нотификацията по член 50, параграф 2 ДЕС и да остане в Съюза. Посочената юрисдикция приема, че е налице съмнение по този въпрос и че отговорът на Съда ще изясни вариантите, с които разполагат членовете на Камарата на общините, когато гласуват по евентуалното споразумение между Обединеното кралство и Съюза. По-конкретно, въз основа на този отговор те ще знаят дали разполагат не с два, а с три варианта, а именно излизане от Съюза без споразумение, излизане от Съюза с представеното пред тях споразумение или оттегляне на нотификацията и оставане на Обединеното кралство в Съюза.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "жалбоподателите"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Запитващата юрисдикция"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Запитващата юрисдикция"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"жалбоподателите";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"уважава жалбата против решението на Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Spanish

Mediante auto de 21 de septiembre de 2018, el órgano jurisdiccional remitente admitió el recurso de apelación interpuesto contra la decisión del Lord Ordinary (Magistrado en funciones de primera instancia) y acogió la solicitud presentada por los demandantes del litigio principal al objeto de que se presentara una petición de decisión prejudicial conforme al artículo 267 TFUE. El órgano jurisdiccional remitente considera que no es prematuro ni teórico preguntar al Tribunal de Justicia si un Estado miembro podría revocar lícitamente de modo unilateral la notificación efectuada con arreglo al artículo 50 TUE, apartado 2, y permanecer en la Unión. Resalta la incertidumbre que rodea esta materia y entiende que la respuesta del Tribunal de Justicia permitirá que los miembros de la Cámara de los Comunes que deban pronunciarse sobre el eventual acuerdo alcanzado entre el Reino Unido y la Unión se hagan una idea cabal de las opciones disponibles. En particular, les permitirá saber si existen ya no dos, sino tres opciones: la retirada de la Unión sin acuerdo, la retirada de la Unión con el acuerdo que se haya sometido a su consideración o la revocación de la notificación de la intención de retirada y la permanencia del Reino Unido en la Unión.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "los demandantes del litigio principal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "El órgano jurisdiccional remitente"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "El órgano jurisdiccional remitente"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"los demandantes del litigio principal";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"órgano jurisdiccional remitente admitió el recurso de apelación interpuesto contra la decisión del Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Czech

Usnesením ze dne 21. září 2018 připustil předkládající soud odvolání podané proti rozhodnutí Lord Ordinary (soudce rozhodující v prvním stupni) a vyhověl návrhu navrhovatelů v původním řízení na předložení žádosti o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce na základě článku 267 SFEU. Předkládající soud má za to, že položení otázky, zda z hlediska práva může členský stát jednostranně odvolat oznámení učiněné podle čl. 50 odst. 2 SEU a setrvat v Unii, Soudnímu dvoru není ani akademické, ani předčasné. Má za to, že v tomto ohledu existuje pochybnost a že odpověď Soudního dvora umožní získat jasnou představu o možnostech dostupných členům Dolní sněmovny v době, kdy budou rozhodovat o případné dohodě mezi Spojeným královstvím a Unií. Konkrétně budou na základě takové odpovědi vědět, zda existují nikoli dvě, nýbrž tři možnosti, a sice vystoupení z Unie bez dohody, vystoupení z Unie s dohodou, která jim bude předložena, nebo odvolání oznámení záměru vystoupit a setrvání Spojeného království v Unii.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "navrhovatelů"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Předkládající soud"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Předkládající soud"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"navrhovatelů";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"Lord Ordinary (soudce rozhodující v prvním stupni) Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Danish

Ved kendelse af 21. september 2018 gav den forelæggende ret tilladelse til appel af den af Lord Ordinary (dommer i første instans) trufne afgørelse og tog den af sagsøgerne i hovedsagen fremsatte begæring om indgivelse af en anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse i henhold til artikel 267 TEUF til følge. Den forelæggende ret er af den opfattelse, at det hverken er akademisk eller for tidligt at forelægge Domstolen spørgsmålet, om det i retlig henseende er muligt for en medlemsstat ensidigt at tilbagekalde meddelelsen i henhold til artikel 50, stk. 2, TEU og at forblive i Unionen. Denne ret finder, at der foreligger tvivl med hensyn til dette spørgsmål, og at Domstolens svar vil indebære en afklaring af, hvilke valgmuligheder medlemmerne af underhuset har, når de skal tage stilling til en eventuel aftale mellem Det Forenede Kongerige og Unionen. Navnlig vil et sådant svar indebære, at de får afklaret, om der er ikke to, men tre valgmuligheder, nemlig udtræden af Unionen uden en aftale, udtræden af Unionen med den aftale, som er blevet forelagt dem, eller tilbagekaldelse af meddelelsen om beslutningen om at udtræde og dermed Det Forenede Kongeriges forbliven i Unionen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "sagsøgerne"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Den forelæggende ret"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Den forelæggende ret"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"sagsøgerne";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"tilladelse til appel af den af Lord Ordinary (dommer i første instans) trufne afgørelse Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: German

Mit Beschluss vom 21. September 2018 gab das vorlegende Gericht der Berufung gegen die Entscheidung des Lord Ordinary (erstinstanzlicher Richter) und dem Antrag der Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens auf ein Vorabentscheidungsersuchen gemäß Art. 267 AEUV statt. Das vorlegende Gericht hält es weder für akademisch noch für verfrüht, den Gerichtshof zu befragen, ob eine einseitige Rücknahme der Mitteilung gemäß Art. 50 Abs. 2 EUV und ein Verbleib in der Union für einen Mitgliedstaat rechtlich möglich seien. Dies sei ungewiss, und die Antwort des Gerichtshofs werde klarstellen, welche Optionen die Mitglieder des House of Commons bei der Abstimmung über ein etwaiges Abkommen zwischen dem Vereinigten Königreich und der Union hätten. Die Antwort werde ihnen insbesondere Klarheit darüber verschaffen, ob es nicht zwei, sondern drei Optionen gebe, und zwar den Austritt aus der Union ohne Abkommen, den Austritt aus der Union mit dem ihnen unterbreiteten Abkommen oder die Rücknahme der Mitteilung der Austrittsabsicht und den Verbleib des Vereinigten Königreichs in der Union.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "das vorlegende Gericht"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "das vorlegende Gericht"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"Lord Ordinary (erstinstanzlicher Richter) Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Estonian

21. septembri 2018. aasta kohtumäärusega rahuldas eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus Lord Ordinary (esimese astme kohtunik) otsuse peale esitatud apellatsioonkaebuse ja põhikohtuasja avaldajate nõude esitada ELTL artikli 267 alusel eelotsusetaotlus. Eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus leiab, et ei saa pidada akadeemiliseks ega ennatlikuks Euroopa Kohtule esitatavat küsimust, kas õiguslikult on liikmesriigil võimalik ELL artikli 50 lõike 2 alusel esitatud teade ühepoolselt tagasi võtta ja liitu jääda. Eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus on seisukohal, et selles küsimuses esineb kahtlusi ja et Euroopa Kohtu vastus teeks selgeks, millised valikuvõimalused on alamkoja liikmetel, kui nad peavad Ühendkuningriigi ja liidu vahel saavutatud võimaliku lepingu suhtes seisukoha võtma. Täpsemalt võimaldab niisugune vastus teada saada, kas ei ole olemas mitte kaks, vaid kolm valikuvõimalust – liidust väljaastumine ilma lepinguta, liidust väljaastumine lepinguga, mis on alamkojale esitatud, või väljaastumise kavatsuse kohta esitatud teate tagasivõtmine ja Ühendkuningriigi jäämine liitu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "põhikohtuasja avaldajate"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"põhikohtuasja avaldajate";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"Lord Ordinary (esimese astme kohtunik) otsuse peale esitatud apellatsioonkaebuse Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Greek

Με διάταξη της 21ης Σεπτεμβρίου 2018, το αιτούν δικαστήριο δέχθηκε την έφεση που ασκήθηκε κατά της απόφασης του Lord Ordinary (δικαστή του πρώτου βαθμού) και έκανε επίσης δεκτό το αίτημα των εκκαλούντων της κύριας δίκης για την υποβολή αίτησης προδικαστικής αποφάσεως δυνάμει του άρθρου 267 ΣΛΕΕ. Το αιτούν δικαστήριο εκτιμά ότι δεν πρόκειται απλώς για θεωρητικό ζήτημα, ούτε είναι πρώιμο να ερωτηθεί το Δικαστήριο αν ένα κράτος μέλος μπορεί νομίμως να ανακαλέσει μονομερώς τη γνωστοποίηση την οποία έχει πραγματοποιήσει βάσει του άρθρου 50, παράγραφος 2, ΣΕΕ και να παραμείνει στην Ένωση. Το δικαστήριο αυτό κρίνει ότι υφίστανται αμφιβολίες ως προς το συγκεκριμένο ζήτημα και ότι η απάντηση του Δικαστηρίου θα αποσαφηνίσει τις επιλογές που θα έχουν στη διάθεσή τους τα μέλη της Βουλής των Κοινοτήτων, όταν θα κληθούν να αποφασίσουν επί της συμφωνίας στην οποία θα έχουν τυχόν καταλήξει το Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο και η Ένωση. Ειδικότερα, η απάντηση του Δικαστηρίου θα τους δώσει τη δυνατότητα να γνωρίζουν αν υπάρχουν όχι δύο, αλλά τρεις επιλογές, ήτοι αποχώρηση από την Ένωση χωρίς συμφωνία, αποχώρηση από την Ένωση με συμφωνία ή ανάκληση της γνωστοποίησης της πρόθεσης αποχώρησης και παραμονή του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου στην Ένωση.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "εκκαλούντων"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "το αιτούν δικαστήριο"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "το αιτούν δικαστήριο"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"εκκαλούντων";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"έφεση που ασκήθηκε κατά της απόφασης του Lord Ordinary Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: French

Par ordonnance du 21 septembre 2018, la juridiction de renvoi a accueilli l’appel interjeté contre la décision du Lord Ordinary (juge de première instance) et a fait droit à la demande des requérants au principal tendant à ce que soit introduite une demande de décision préjudicielle en vertu de l’article 267 TFUE. La juridiction de renvoi estime qu’il n’est ni académique ni prématuré de demander à la Cour s’il est possible en droit, pour un État membre, de révoquer unilatéralement la notification effectuée au titre de l’article 50, paragraphe 2, TUE et de rester dans l’Union. Ladite juridiction considère qu’il existe un doute à ce sujet et que la réponse de la Cour clarifiera les options dont disposent les membres de la Chambre des Communes lorsqu’ils auront à se prononcer sur l’éventuel accord intervenu entre le Royaume-Uni et l’Union. En particulier, une telle réponse leur permettra de savoir s’il existe non pas deux, mais trois options, à savoir le retrait de l’Union sans accord, le retrait de l’Union avec l’accord qui leur aura été soumis, ou la révocation de la notification de l’intention de retrait et le maintien du Royaume-Uni dans l’Union.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "des requérants"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "La juridiction de renvoi"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "La juridiction de renvoi"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"des requérants";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"Lord Ordinary (juge de première instance) et a fait droit à la demande des requérants au principal tendant à ce que soit introduite une demande de décision préjudicielle en vertu de l’article 267 TFUE. Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Croatian

Rješenjem od 21. rujna 2018. sud koji je uputio zahtjev dopustio je žalbu podnesenu protiv odluke koju je donio Lord Ordinary (sudac Vanjskog odjela) te je prihvatio prijedlog tužiteljâ u glavnom postupku za upućivanje zahtjeva za prethodnu odluku na temelju članka 267. UFEU‑a. Sud koji je uputio zahtjev ocjenjuje da pitanje upućeno Sudu u vezi s time je li državi članici pravno dopušteno jednostrano opozvati obavijest dostavljenu na temelju članka 50. stavka 2. UEU‑a i ostati u Uniji nije ni teoretsko ni preuranjeno. Navedeni sud smatra da postoji dvojba u vezi s time i da će odgovor Suda pojasniti mogućnosti koje imaju zastupnici u Zastupničkom domu kada će odlučivati o eventualno postignutom sporazumu između Ujedinjene Kraljevine i Unije. Točnije, takav će im odgovor omogućiti da znaju postoje li dvije ili ipak tri mogućnosti, to jest povlačenje iz Unije bez sporazuma, povlačenje iz Unije sa sporazumom koji će se pred njih iznijeti ili opoziv obavijesti o namjeri povlačenja i ostanak Ujedinjene Kraljevine u Uniji.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "tužiteljâ"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sud koji je uputio zahtjev"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Sud koji je uputio zahtjev"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"tužiteljâ";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"žalbu podnesenu protiv odluke Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Italian

Con ordinanza del 21 settembre 2018 il giudice del rinvio ha ammesso l’appello interposto contro la decisione del Lord Ordinary (giudice di primo grado) e ha accolto la richiesta dei ricorrenti nel procedimento principale di presentare una domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale ai sensi dell’articolo 267 TFUE. Il giudice del rinvio ritiene che non sia né accademico né prematuro chiedere alla Corte se sia giuridicamente possibile, per uno Stato membro, revocare unilateralmente la notifica effettuata ai sensi dell’articolo 50, paragrafo 2, TUE e rimanere nell’Unione. Detto giudice considera che la materia sia incerta e che la risposta della Corte avrà l’effetto di chiarire le opzioni disponibili per i membri della Camera dei Comuni al momento di pronunciarsi sull’eventuale accordo intervenuto tra il Regno Unito e l’Unione. In particolare, tale risposta consentirà loro di sapere se esistano non due, ma tre opzioni, vale a dire il recesso dall’Unione senza accordo, il recesso dall’Unione con l’accordo che sarà loro sottoposto, o la revoca della notifica dell’intenzione di recedere e la permanenza del Regno Unito nell’Unione.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "i ricorrenti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Il giudice del rinvio"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Il giudice del rinvio"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"i ricorrenti";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"Lord Ordinary (giudice di primo grado) Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Latvian

Ar 2018. gada 21. septembra rīkojumu iesniedzējtiesa apmierināja apelācijas sūdzību par Lord Ordinary (pirmās instances tiesnesis) nolēmumu un apmierināja prasītāju pamatlietā pieteikumu iesniegt lūgumu sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu saskaņā ar LESD 267. pantu. Iesniedzējtiesa uzskata, ka nav nedz akadēmiski, nedz pāragri uzdot Tiesai jautājumu, vai dalībvalsts ir tiesīga vienpusēji atsaukt atbilstoši LES 50. panta 2. punktam veikto paziņojumu un palikt Savienībā. Šī tiesa uzskata, ka pastāv šaubas par šo jautājumu un Tiesas atbilde izskaidrotu Pārstāvju palātas deputātiem pieejamās iespējas, kad viņiem būs jālemj par eventuālo līgumu starp Apvienoto Karalisti un Savienību. Konkrēti, šāda atbilde tiem ļautu uzzināt, vai pastāv nevis divas, bet gan trīs iespējas, proti, izstāšanās no Savienības bez līguma, izstāšanās no Savienības ar līgumu, kurš tiem būtu iesniegts, vai paziņojuma par nodomu izstāties atsaukšana un Apvienotās Karalistes palikšana Savienībā.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Iesniedzējtiesa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Iesniedzējtiesa"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Iesniedzējtiesa"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"Iesniedzējtiesa";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"pirmās instances tiesnesis) nolēmumu Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Lithuanian

2018 m. rugsėjo 21 d. nutartimi prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas patenkino apeliacinį skundą dėl Lord Ordinary (pirmosios instancijos teisėjas) sprendimo ir patenkino ieškovų pagrindinėje byloje prašymą pateikti prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pagal SESV 267 straipsnį. Prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas mano, kad klausimas Teisingumo Teismui, ar teisiškai įmanoma valstybei narei vienašališkai atšaukti pagal ESS 50 straipsnio 2 dalį pateiktą pranešimą ir likti Sąjungoje, nėra nei teorinis, nei keliamas pernelyg anksti. Šis teismas mano, kad šiuo klausimu kyla abejonių ir kad Teisingumo Teismo atsakymas leis Bendruomenių rūmų nariams žinoti, kokias pasirinkimo galimybes jie turės balsuodami dėl galimo Jungtinės Karalystės ir Sąjungos susitarimo. Konkrečiai kalbant, šis atsakymas jiems leis žinoti, ar egzistuoja ne dvi, o trys pasirinkimo galimybės, t. y. išstoti iš Sąjungos be susitarimo, išstoti iš Sąjungos sudarius jiems pateiktą susitarimą arba atšaukti pranešimą apie ketinimą išstoti, kad Jungtinė Karalystė liktų Sąjungoje.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "ieškovų"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"ieškovų";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"Lord Ordinary (pirmosios instancijos teisėjas) sprendimo Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Hungarian

A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság 2018. szeptember 21‑i végzésében megengedte a Lord Ordinary (első fokon eljáró bíró) határozatával szembeni fellebbezést, és helyt adott a felperesek azon kérelmének, hogy az EUMSZ 267. cikk alapján előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem előterjesztésére kerüljön sor. A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság úgy véli, hogy nem elméleti jellegű és nem is idő előtti azt a kérdést feltenni a Bíróságnak, hogy jogilag lehetséges‑e, hogy valamely tagállam egyoldalúan visszavonja az EUSZ 50. cikk (2) bekezdése alapján tett bejelentést, és az Unió tagja maradjon. Az említett bíróság álláspontja szerint a kérdés nem egyértelmű, és a Bíróság válasza tisztázni fogja az Egyesült Királyság és az Unió között létrejött esetleges megállapodásról való szavazás során az alsóházi képviselők rendelkezésére álló lehetőségeket. E válasz különösen lehetővé tenné számukra annak megállapítását, hogy nem kettő, hanem három lehetőség van: nevezetesen az Unióból való megállapodás nélküli kilépés, az Unióból a parlament elé terjesztendő megállapodással való kilépés, vagy a kilépési szándék bejelentésének visszavonása és az Egyesült Királyság Unióban maradása.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "felperesek"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"felperesek";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"Lord Ordinary (első fokon eljáró bíró) határozatával szembeni fellebbezést, és helyt adott a felperesek azon kérelmének Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Maltese

Permezz ta’ digriet tal-21 ta’ Settembru 2018, il-qorti tar-rinviju laqgħet l-appell ippreżentat kontra d-deċiżjoni tal-Lord Ordinary (l-Imħallef tal-Ewwel Istanza) u laqgħet it-talba tar-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali għat-tressiq ta’ talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari skont l-Artikolu 267 TFUE. Il-qorti tar-rinviju tqis li la huwa akkademiku u lanqas prematur li ssir domanda lill-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja dwar jekk id-dritt jippermettix lil Stat Membru jirrevoka unilateralment in-notifika mwettqa taħt l-Artikolu 50(2) TUE u jibqa’ fl-Unjoni. L-imsemmija qorti tqis li hemm dubju dwar dan il-punt u li r-risposta tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja ser tikkjarifika l-għażliet disponibbli għall-Membri tal-House of Commons meta jiġu sabiex jivvotaw dwar l-eventwali ftehim milħuq bejn ir-Renju Unit u l-Unjoni. B’mod partikolari, tali risposta ser tippermettilhom jifhmu li ma hemmx żewġ għażliet iżda tlieta, jiġifieri l-ħruġ mill-Unjoni mingħajr ftehim, il-ħruġ mill-Unjoni bil-ftehim li jkun tressaq quddiemhom, jew ir-revoka tan-notifika tal-intenzjoni ta’ ħruġ u l-kontinwazzjoni tar-Renju Unit fl-Unjoni.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "tar-rikorrenti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "il-qorti tar-rinviju"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "il-qorti tar-rinviju"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"tar-rikorrenti";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"Lord Ordinary (l-Imħallef tal-Ewwel Istanza) Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Dutch

Bij beschikking van 21 september 2018 heeft de verwijzende rechter het hoger beroep tegen de beschikking van de Lord Ordinary in behandeling genomen en het verzoek van verzoekers in het hoofdgeding om krachtens artikel 267 VWEU een prejudiciële vraag te stellen toegewezen. De verwijzende rechter overweegt dat het noch academisch, noch prematuur is om het Hof te vragen of een lidstaat de uit hoofde van artikel 50, lid 2, VEU gedane kennisgeving rechtens eenzijdig kan herroepen en in de Unie kan blijven. Hij is van oordeel dat er onzekerheid is en dat het antwoord van het Hof de opties zal verduidelijken waarover de leden van het Lagerhuis beschikken bij de stemming over het akkoord dat mogelijk is gesloten tussen het Verenigd Koninkrijk en de Unie. Met dat antwoord zullen zij in het bijzonder te weten komen of er misschien niet twee, maar drie opties openstaan, namelijk terugtrekking uit de Unie zonder akkoord, terugtrekking uit de Unie met het akkoord dat hun is voorgelegd, of intrekking van de kennisgeving van het voornemen tot terugtrekking van het Verenigd Koninkrijk en lid blijven van de Unie.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "verzoekers"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de verwijzende rechter"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "de verwijzende rechter"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"verzoekers";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"Bij beschikking van 21 september 2018 heeft de verwijzende rechter het hoger beroep tegen de beschikking van de Lord Ordinary in behandeling genomen Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 10 December 2018.
Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Inner House, First Division (Scotland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 50 TEU — Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union — Consequences of the notification — Right of unilateral revocation of the notification — Conditions.
Case C-621/18. (2018)
Language: Polish

Postanowieniem z dnia 21 września 2018 r. sąd odsyłający uwzględnił apelację od orzeczenia Lord Ordinary (sędziego pierwszej instancji) oraz przychylił się do wniosku powodów w postępowaniu głównym o wystąpienie z wnioskiem o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym na podstawie art. 267 TFUE. Sąd odsyłający uważa, że zwrócenie się do Trybunału z pytaniem, czy istnieje prawna możliwość jednostronnego wycofania przez państwo członkowskie notyfikacji dokonanej na podstawie art. 50 ust. 2 TUE oraz pozostania w Unii, nie jest ani natury akademickiej, ani przedwczesne. Rzeczony sąd uważa, że istnieje w tej kwestii wątpliwość oraz że odpowiedź Trybunału wyjaśni, jakie możliwości będą mieć członkowie izby gmin w chwili, gdy będą musieli zająć stanowisko w przedmiocie ewentualnej umowy między Zjednoczonym Królestwem a Unią. W szczególności odpowiedź taka sprawi, że będą oni wiedzieć, czy istnieją nie dwie, lecz trzy opcje, a mianowicie: wystąpienie z Unii bez umowy, wystąpienie z Unii z umową, która zostanie im przedłożona, lub wycofanie notyfikacji zamiaru wystąpienia i pozostanie Zjednoczonego Królestwa w Unii.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "powodów"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sąd odsyłający"[shape=doubleoctagon];


  "Sąd odsyłający"->"Order 21/09/2018";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"powodów";
  "Order 21/09/2018"->"uwzględnił apelację od orzeczenia Lord Ordinary 21/09/2018"[dir=none];
    
}