mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Sodišče je s sklepom z dne 17. decembra 2018, Komisija/Poljska (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), ugodilo predlogu Komisije za izdajo začasnih odredb do razglasitve končne sodbe v zadevi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Sodišče"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisija/Poljska"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Sodišče"->"sklepom z dne 17. decembra 2018";
  "sklepom z dne 17. decembra 2018"->"Komisija/Poljska";
  "sklepom z dne 17. decembra 2018"->"Sodišče je s sklepom z dne 17. decembra 2018, Komisija/Poljska (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), ugodilo predlogu Komisije za izdajo začasnih odredb do razglasitve končne sodbe v zadevi.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Unionin tuomioistuin hyväksyi 17.12.2018 annetulla määräyksellä komissio v. Puola (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021) komission välitoimihakemuksen siihen asti, kunnes annetaan tuomio, jolla nyt esillä olevan asian käsittely päätetään.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Unionin tuomioistuin"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "komissio v. Puola"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Unionin tuomioistuin"->"17.12.2018 annetulla määräyksellä";
  "17.12.2018 annetulla määräyksellä"->"komissio v. Puola";
  "17.12.2018 annetulla määräyksellä"->"Unionin tuomioistuin hyväksyi 17.12.2018 annetulla määräyksellä komissio v. Puola (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021) komission välitoimihakemuksen siihen asti, kunnes annetaan tuomio, jolla nyt esillä olevan asian käsittely päätetään.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Genom beslut av den 17 december 2018, kommissionen/Polen (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:1021), biföll domstolen kommissionens ansökan om interimistiska åtgärder fram till dess att slutlig dom meddelas i förevarande mål.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "domstolen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "kommissionen/Polen"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "domstolen"->"beslut av den 17 december 2018";
  "beslut av den 17 december 2018"->"kommissionen/Polen";
  "beslut av den 17 december 2018"->"Domstolen biföll kommissionens ansökan om interimistiska åtgärder fram till dess att slutlig dom meddelas i förevarande mål.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: English

In addition, by his order of 15 November 2018, Commission v Poland (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), the President of the Court, at the request of the Commission, decided that the present case was to be determined under the expedited procedure provided for in Article 23a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 133 of the Rules of Procedure.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Court of Justice"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Commission v Poland"[shape=doubleoctagon];

   "The Court of Justice"->"Order 15/11/2018";
   "Order 15/11/2018"->"Commission v Poland";
   "Order 15/11/2018"->"The present case was to be determined under the expedited procedure provided for in Article 23a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 133 of the Rules of Procedure."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

Освен това с определение от 15 ноември 2018 г., Комисия/Полша (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), по искане на Комисията председателят на Съда решава настоящото дело бъде разгледано по реда на бързото производство, предвидено в член 23а от Статута на Съда на Европейския съюз и в член 133 от Процедурния правилник на Съда.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Съда на Европейския съюз"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Комисия/Полша"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Съда на Европейския съюз"->"определение от 15 ноември 2018 г.";
  "определение от 15 ноември 2018 г."->"Комисия/Полша";
  "определение от 15 ноември 2018 г."->"настоящото дело бъде разгледано по реда на бързото производство, предвидено в член 23а от Статута на Съда на Европейския съюз и в член 133 от Процедурния правилник на Съда.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Por otra parte, mediante auto de 15 de noviembre de 2018, Comisión/Polonia (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), el Presidente del Tribunal de Justicia decidió, a instancias de la Comisión, que el presente asunto se tramitara por el procedimiento acelerado previsto en el artículo 23 bis del Estatuto del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea y en el artículo 133 del Reglamento de Procedimiento.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal de Justicia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comisión/Polonia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Tribunal de Justicia"->"auto de 15 de noviembre de 2018";
  "auto de 15 de noviembre de 2018"->"Comisión/Polonia";
  "auto de 15 de noviembre de 2018"->"el presente asunto se tramitara por el procedimiento acelerado previsto en el artículo 23 bis del Estatuto del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea y en el artículo 133 del Reglamento de Procedimiento.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Kromě toho usnesením ze dne 15. listopadu 2018, Komise v. Polsko (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), předseda Soudního dvora na návrh Komise rozhodl, že tato věc bude projednána ve zrychleném řízení podle článku 23a statutu Soudního dvora Evropské unie a článku 133 jednacího řádu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Soudního dvora"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komise v. Polsko"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Soudního dvora"->"usnesením ze dne 15. listopadu 2018";
  "usnesením ze dne 15. listopadu 2018"->"Komise v. Polsko";
  "usnesením ze dne 15. listopadu 2018"->"tato věc bude projednána ve zrychleném řízení podle článku 23a statutu Soudního dvora Evropské unie a článku 133 jednacího řádu.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Ved kendelse af 15. november 2018, Kommissionen mod Polen (C-619/18, EU:C:2018:910), besluttede Domstolens præsident endvidere efter anmodning fra Kommissionen at undergive den foreliggende sag den fremskyndede procedure som omhandlet i artikel 23a i statutten for Den Europæiske Unions Domstol og procesreglementets artikel 133.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Den Europæiske Unions Domstol"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kommissionen mod Polen"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Den Europæiske Unions Domstol"->"kendelse af 15. november 2018";
  "kendelse af 15. november 2018"->"Kommissionen mod Polen";
  "kendelse af 15. november 2018"->"den foreliggende sag den fremskyndede procedure som omhandlet i artikel 23a i statutten for Den Europæiske Unions Domstol og procesreglementets artikel 133.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: German

Ferner hat der Präsident des Gerichtshofs mit Beschluss vom 15. November 2018, Kommission/Polen (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), auf Antrag der Kommission entschieden, die vorliegende Rechtssache gemäß Art. 23a der Satzung des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Union und Art. 133 der Verfahrensordnung dem beschleunigten Verfahren zu unterwerfen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "der Gerichtshof"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kommission/Polen"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "der Gerichtshof"->"Beschluss vom 15. November 2018";
  "Beschluss vom 15. November 2018"->"Kommission/Polen";
  "Beschluss vom 15. November 2018"->"die vorliegende Rechtssache gemäß Art. 23a der Satzung des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Union und Art. 133 der Verfahrensordnung dem beschleunigten Verfahren zu unterwerfen.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Lisaks otsustas Euroopa Kohtu president 15. novembri 2018. aasta määrusega komisjon vs. Poola (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910) komisjoni taotlusel kohaldada käesolevas kohtuasjas kiirendatud menetlust, mis on ette nähtud Euroopa Liidu Kohtu põhikirja artiklis 23a ja kodukorra artiklis 133.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Euroopa Kohtu"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "komisjon vs. Poola"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Euroopa Kohtu"->"15. novembri 2018. aasta määrusega";
  "15. novembri 2018. aasta määrusega"->"komisjon vs. Poola";
  "15. novembri 2018. aasta määrusega"->"käesolevas kohtuasjas kiirendatud menetlust, mis on ette nähtud Euroopa Liidu Kohtu põhikirja artiklis 23a ja kodukorra artiklis 133.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Επιπλέον, με διάταξή του της 15ης Νοεμβρίου 2018, Επιτροπή κατά Πολωνίας (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), ο Πρόεδρος του Δικαστηρίου αποφάσισε, κατόπιν αιτήματος της Επιτροπής, να υπαχθεί η υπό κρίση υπόθεση στην ταχεία διαδικασία η οποία προβλέπεται στο άρθρο 23α του Οργανισμού του Δικαστηρίου της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και στο άρθρο 133 του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Δικαστηρίου"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Επιτροπή κατά Πολωνίας"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Δικαστηρίου"->"διάταξή του της 15ης Νοεμβρίου 2018";
  "διάταξή του της 15ης Νοεμβρίου 2018"->"Επιτροπή κατά Πολωνίας";
  "διάταξή του της 15ης Νοεμβρίου 2018"->"η υπό κρίση υπόθεση στην ταχεία διαδικασία η οποία προβλέπεται στο άρθρο 23α του Οργανισμού του Δικαστηρίου της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και στο άρθρο 133 του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: French

Par ailleurs, par son ordonnance du 15 novembre 2018, Commission/Pologne (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), le président de la Cour a, à la demande de la Commission, décidé de soumettre la présente affaire à la procédure accélérée prévue à l’article 23 bis du statut de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne et à l’article 133 du règlement de procédure.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la Cour de justice"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Commission/Pologne"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "la Cour de justice"->"ordonnance du 15 novembre 2018";
  "ordonnance du 15 novembre 2018"->"Commission/Pologne";
  "ordonnance du 15 novembre 2018"->"la présente affaire à la procédure accélérée prévue à l’article 23 bis du statut de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne et à l’article 133 du règlement de procédure.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Nadalje, rješenjem od 15. studenoga 2018., Komisija/Poljska (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910) predsjednik Suda je na zahtjev Komisije odlučio da se ovaj predmet vodi po ubrzanom postupku predviđenom u članku 23.a Statuta Suda Europske unije i u članku 133. Poslovnika.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Suda Europske unije"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisija/Poljska"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Suda Europske unije"->"rješenjem od 15. studenoga 2018.";
  "rješenjem od 15. studenoga 2018."->"Komisija/Poljska";
  "rješenjem od 15. studenoga 2018."->"Ovaj predmet vodi po ubrzanom postupku predviđenom u članku 23.a Statuta Suda Europske unije i u članku 133. Poslovnika.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Inoltre, con ordinanza del 15 novembre 2018, Commissione/Polonia (C‑619/18, non pubblicata, EU:C:2018:910), il presidente della Corte, su istanza della Commissione, ha deciso di trattare la presente causa con procedimento accelerato ai sensi dell’articolo 23 bis dello Statuto della Corte di giustizia dell’Unione europea e dell’articolo 133 del regolamento di procedura.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Corte di giustizia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Commissione/Polonia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Corte di giustizia"->"ordinanza del 15 novembre 2018";
  "ordinanza del 15 novembre 2018"->"Commissione/Polonia";
  "ordinanza del 15 novembre 2018"->"ha deciso di trattare la presente causa con procedimento accelerato ai sensi dell’articolo 23 bis dello Statuto della Corte di giustizia dell’Unione europea e dell’articolo 133 del regolamento di procedura.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Turklāt ar 2018. gada 15. novembra rīkojumu lietā Komisija/Polija (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910) Tiesas priekšsēdētājs pēc Komisijas pieprasījuma šo lietu nolēma izskatīt paātrinātā tiesvedībā, kas ir paredzēta Eiropas Savienības Tiesas statūtu 23.a pantā un Reglamenta 133. pantā.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tiesas"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisija/Polija"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Tiesas"->"2018. gada 15. novembra rīkojumu";
  "2018. gada 15. novembra rīkojumu"->"Komisija/Polija";
  "2018. gada 15. novembra rīkojumu"->"Šo lietu nolēma izskatīt paātrinātā tiesvedībā, kas ir paredzēta Eiropas Savienības Tiesas statūtu 23.a pantā un Reglamenta 133. pantā.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Be to, 2018 m. lapkričio 15 d. Nutartimi Komisija / Lenkija (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910) Teisingumo Teismo pirmininkas Komisijos prašymu nutarė nagrinėti šią bylą pagal pagreitintą procedūrą, numatytą Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo statuto 23a straipsnyje ir Procedūros reglamento 133 straipsnyje.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Teisingumo Teismo"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisija / Lenkija"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Teisingumo Teismo"->"2018 m. lapkričio 15 d. Nutartimi";
  "2018 m. lapkričio 15 d. Nutartimi"->"Komisija / Lenkija";
  "2018 m. lapkričio 15 d. Nutartimi"->"Šią bylą pagal pagreitintą procedūrą, numatytą Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo statuto 23a straipsnyje ir Procedūros reglamento 133 straipsnyje.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Egyébiránt a 2018. november 15‑iBizottság kontra Lengyelország végzésében (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910) a Bíróság elnöke a Bizottság kérelmére úgy határozott, hogy a jelen ügyet az Európai Unió Bírósága alapokmányának 23a. cikkében, valamint az eljárási szabályzat 133. cikkében foglalt gyorsított eljárásban bírálja el.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Európai Unió Bírósága"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Bizottság kontra Lengyelország"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Európai Unió Bírósága"->"2018. november 15‑iBizottság kontra Lengyelország végzésében";
  "2018. november 15‑iBizottság kontra Lengyelország végzésében"->"Bizottság kontra Lengyelország";
  "2018. november 15‑iBizottság kontra Lengyelország végzésében"->"a jelen ügyet az Európai Unió Bírósága alapokmányának 23a. cikkében, valamint az eljárási szabályzat 133. cikkében foglalt gyorsított eljárásban bírálja el.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Barra minn hekk, permezz tad-digriet tiegħu tal‑15 ta’ Novembru 2018, Il‑Kummissjoni vs Il‑Polonja (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), il-President tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja ddeċieda, fuq talba tal-Kummissjoni, li jissuġġetta din il-kawża għall-proċedura mħaffa prevista fl-Artikolu 23a tal-Istatut tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja tal-Unjoni Ewropea u fl-Artikolu 133 tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Qorti tal-Ġustizzja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Il‑Kummissjoni vs Il‑Polonja"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Qorti tal-Ġustizzja"->"digriet tiegħu tal‑15 ta’ Novembru 2018";
  "digriet tiegħu tal‑15 ta’ Novembru 2018"->"Il‑Kummissjoni vs Il‑Polonja";
  "digriet tiegħu tal‑15 ta’ Novembru 2018"->"din il-kawża għall-proċedura mħaffa prevista fl-Artikolu 23a tal-Istatut tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja tal-Unjoni Ewropea u fl-Artikolu 133 tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Voorts heeft de president van het Hof bij beschikking van 15 november 2018, Commissie/Polen (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), op verzoek van de Commissie beslist om deze zaak te behandelen volgens de versnelde procedure in de zin van artikel 23 bis van het Statuut van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie en van artikel 133 van het Reglement voor de procesvoering.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "het Hof van Justitie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Commissie/Polen"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "het Hof van Justitie"->"beschikking van 15 november 2018";
  "beschikking van 15 november 2018"->"Commissie/Polen";
  "beschikking van 15 november 2018"->"deze zaak te behandelen volgens de versnelde procedure in de zin van artikel 23 bis van het Statuut van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie en van artikel 133 van het Reglement voor de procesvoering.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Ponadto postanowieniem z dnia 15 listopada 2018 r., Komisja/Polska (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), prezes Trybunału, na wniosek Komisji, zdecydował o objęciu niniejszej sprawy trybem przyspieszonym przewidzianym w art. 23a statutu Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej i w art. 133 regulaminu postępowania.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisja/Polska"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej"->"postanowieniem z dnia 15 listopada 2018 r.";
  "postanowieniem z dnia 15 listopada 2018 r."->"Komisja/Polska";
  "postanowieniem z dnia 15 listopada 2018 r."->"Objęciu niniejszej sprawy trybem przyspieszonym przewidzianym w art. 23a statutu Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej i w art. 133 regulaminu postępowania.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Por outro lado, por Despacho de 15 de novembro de 2018, Comissão/Polónia (C‑619/18 R, EU:C:2018:910), o presidente do Tribunal de Justiça, a pedido da Comissão, submeteu o presente processo à tramitação acelerada prevista no artigo 23.o‑A do Estatuto do Tribunal de Justiça da União Europeia e no artigo 133.o do Regulamento de Processo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal de Justiça"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comissão/Polónia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Tribunal de Justiça"->"Despacho de 15 de novembro de 2018";
  "Despacho de 15 de novembro de 2018"->"Comissão/Polónia";
  "Despacho de 15 de novembro de 2018"->"o presente processo à tramitação acelerada prevista no artigo 23.o‑A do Estatuto do Tribunal de Justiça da União Europeia e no artigo 133.o do Regulamento de Processo.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Pe de altă parte, prin Ordonanța din 15 noiembrie 2018, Comisia/Polonia (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), președintele Curții a decis, la solicitarea Comisiei, judecarea prezentei cauze potrivit procedurii accelerate prevăzute la articolul 23a din Statutul Curții de Justiție a Uniunii Europene și la articolul 133 din Regulamentul de procedură.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Curții de Justiție"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comisia/Polonia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Curții de Justiție"->"Ordonanța din 15 noiembrie 2018";
  "Ordonanța din 15 noiembrie 2018"->"Comisia/Polonia";
  "Ordonanța din 15 noiembrie 2018"->"Judecarea prezentei cauze potrivit procedurii accelerate prevăzute la articolul 23a din Statutul Curții de Justiție a Uniunii Europene și la articolul 133 din Regulamentul de procedură.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Okrem toho uznesením z 15. novembra 2018, Komisia/Poľsko (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), predseda Súdneho dvora na návrh Komisie rozhodol, že táto vec bude prejednaná v skrátenom konaní podľa článku 23a Štatútu Súdneho dvora Európskej únie a článku 133 rokovacieho poriadku.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Súdneho dvora"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisia/Poľsko"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Súdneho dvora"->"uznesením z 15. novembra 2018";
  "uznesením z 15. novembra 2018"->"Komisia/Poľsko";
  "uznesením z 15. novembra 2018"->"táto vec bude prejednaná v skrátenom konaní podľa článku 23a Štatútu Súdneho dvora Európskej únie a článku 133 rokovacieho poriadku.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Poleg tega je predsednik Sodišča s sklepom z dne 15. novembra 2018, Komisija/Poljska (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), na predlog Komisije odločil, da se ta zadeva obravnava po hitrem postopku, ki je določen v člena 23a Statuta Sodišča Evropske unije in členu 133 Poslovnika.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Sodišča Evropske unije"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komisija/Poljska"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Sodišča Evropske unije"->"sklepom z dne 15. novembra 2018";
  "sklepom z dne 15. novembra 2018"->"Komisija/Poljska";
  "sklepom z dne 15. novembra 2018"->"Ta zadeva se obravnava po hitrem postopku, ki je določen v člena 23a Statuta Sodišča Evropske unije in členu 133 Poslovnika.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Unionin tuomioistuimen presidentti päätti lisäksi komission pyynnöstä 15.11.2018 antamallaan määräyksellä komissio v. Puola (C-619/18, EU:C:2018:910) käsitellä nyt esillä olevan asian Euroopan unionin tuomioistuimen perussäännön 23 a artiklassa ja työjärjestyksen 133 artiklassa määrätyssä nopeutetussa menettelyssä.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Unionin tuomioistuimen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "komissio v. Puola"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Unionin tuomioistuimen"->"15.11.2018 antamallaan määräyksellä";
  "15.11.2018 antamallaan määräyksellä"->"komissio v. Puola";
  "15.11.2018 antamallaan määräyksellä"->"nyt esillä olevan asian käsitellä Euroopan unionin tuomioistuimen perussäännön 23 a artiklassa ja työjärjestyksen 133 artiklassa määrätyssä nopeutetussa menettelyssä.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.
European Commission v Republic of Poland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.
Case C-619/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Genom beslut av den 15 november 2018, kommissionen/Polen (C‑619/18, EU:C:2018:910), beslutade domstolens ordförande – efter att kommissionen framställt yrkande därom – att målet skulle handläggas skyndsamt enligt artikel 23a i stadgan för Europeiska unionens domstol och artikel 133 i rättegångsreglerna.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Europeiska unionens domstol"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "kommissionen/Polen"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Europeiska unionens domstol"->"beslut av den 15 november 2018";
  "beslut av den 15 november 2018"->"kommissionen/Polen";
  "beslut av den 15 november 2018"->"målet skulle handläggas skyndsamt enligt artikel 23a i stadgan för Europeiska unionens domstol och artikel 133 i rättegångsreglerna.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: English

By inter partes judgment of the hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Court of Appeal, Antwerp, Belgium) of 1 February 2013, IK, a Belgian national, was sentenced to a primary custodial sentence of three years for the sexual assault of a minor under 16 years old without violence or threat (‘the primary sentence’). In the same judgment, and for that same offence, he was also subject to an additional sentence of release conditional to placement at the disposal of the strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Court for the enforcement of custodial sentences) for a 10-year period (‘the additional sentence’). In accordance with Belgian law, that sentence takes effect after the expiry of the main sentence and, for the purposes of its enforcement, the strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Court for the enforcement of custodial sentences) is to decide, before the expiry of the main sentence, either in favour of deprivation of liberty or in favour of release conditional to placement of the person convicted at the disposal of that court.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Court of Appeal, Antwerp, Belgium)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

   "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Court of Appeal, Antwerp, Belgium)"->"Judgement 01/02/2013";
   "Judgement 01/02/2013"->"IK";
   "IK"->"A primary custodial sentence of three years for the sexual assault of a minor under 16 years old without violence or threat (‘the primary sentence’)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Bulgarian

С присъда, постановена в състезателно производство от Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Апелативен съд Антверпен, Белгия) на 1 февруари 2013 г., белгийският гражданин IK е осъден за деяние, съставляващо блудство с непълнолетно лице на възраст под 16 години, извършено без насилие или заплахи, и му е наложено основно наказание лишаване от свобода за срок от три години (наричано по-нататък „основното наказание“). Със същото решение и за същото престъпление, като допълващо наказание, той е и оставен на разположение на strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (съда по изпълнението на наказанията) за срок от 10 години. Съгласно белгийското право това наказание започва да се изпълнява след изтичането на срока на основното наказание, а за целите на изпълнението му strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (съдът по изпълнението на наказанията) решава, преди да изтече основното наказание, дали да лиши от свобода, или да освободи под наблюдение оставеното на разположение осъдено лице.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Апелативен съд Антверпен, Белгия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Апелативен съд Антверпен, Белгия)"->"1 февруари 2013 г.";
  "1 февруари 2013 г."->"IK";
  "IK"->"основно наказание лишаване от свобода за срок от три години за деяние, съставляващо блудство с непълнолетно лице на възраст под 16 години, извършено без насилие или заплахи (наричано по-нататък „основното наказание“)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Spanish

Mediante sentencia dictada por el hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Tribunal de Apelación de Amberes, Bélgica) en procedimiento contradictorio el 1 de febrero de 2013, IK, de nacionalidad belga, fue condenado a una pena principal de tres años de prisión por un delito de abusos sexuales sin violencia ni amenazas contra un menor de edad inferior a 16 años (en lo sucesivo, «pena principal»). Mediante la misma sentencia, y por ese mismo delito, también se le impuso, como pena accesoria, la puesta a disposición del strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (tribunal de vigilancia penitenciaria) durante un período de diez años (en lo sucesivo, «pena accesoria»). Conforme al Derecho belga, esta pena comienza con la expiración de la pena principal y, a efectos de su ejecución, el strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (tribunal de vigilancia penitenciaria) decide, antes de la expiración de dicha pena principal, o bien privar de libertad o bien poner en libertad bajo vigilancia al condenado puesto a disposición.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Tribunal de Apelación de Amberes, Bélgica)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Tribunal de Apelación de Amberes, Bélgica)"->"sentencia dictada por el hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Tribunal de Apelación de Amberes, Bélgica) el 1 de febrero de 2013";
  "sentencia dictada por el hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Tribunal de Apelación de Amberes, Bélgica) el 1 de febrero de 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"una pena principal de tres años de prisión por un delito de abusos sexuales sin violencia ni amenazas contra un menor de edad inferior a 16 años (en lo sucesivo, «pena principal»)"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Czech

Na základě rozsudku vyneseného v kontradiktorním řízení hof van beroep Antwerpen (odvolací soud v Antverpách, Belgie) ze dne 1. února 2013 byl IK, belgickému státnímu příslušníkovi, uložen hlavní trest odnětí svobody v délce trvání tří let za trestný čin sexuálního obtěžování bez použití násilí či výhrůžek vůči nezletilé osobě mladší šestnácti let (dále jen „hlavní trest“). Týmž rozsudkem a z důvodu téhož trestného činu byl dále uložen doplňující trest, a to podřízení odsouzeného moci strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (soud pro výkon trestů) na dobu deseti let (dále jen „doplňující trest“). Podle belgického práva tento trest počíná běžet odpykáním hlavního trestu a strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (soud pro výkon trestů) před odpykáním hlavního trestu rozhodne o tom, zda odsouzený, který byl podřízen jeho moci, bude zbaven osobní svobody, nebo bude propuštěn s uložením soudního dohledu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen odvolací soud v Antverpách, Belgie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The hof van beroep te Antwerpen odvolací soud v Antverpách, Belgie"->"1. února 2013";
  "1. února 2013"->"IK";
  "IK"->"hlavní trest odnětí svobody v délce trvání tří let za trestný čin sexuálního obtěžování bez použití násilí či výhrůžek vůči nezletilé osobě mladší šestnácti let (dále jen „hlavní trest“)"[dir=none];
    
}