mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

NJ has been placed in provisional detention in Berlin, Germany, since 14 May 2019, in connection with criminal proceedings against him in Germany for theft. According to the referring court, NJ, when questioned on 24 May 2019, did not consent to simplified extradition.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The referring court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

   "NJ"->"The referring court"[label="No consent for simplified extradition 24/05/2019"];
   "NJ"->"Provisional detention in Berlin, Germany 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

От 14 май 2019 г. NJ е задържан под стража в Берлин (Германия) в рамките на наказателно производство за кражба, образувано срещу него в Германия. Според запитващата юрисдикция на проведения на 24 май 2019 г. разпит NJ е отказал опростената екстрадиция.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "запитващата юрисдикция"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"запитващата юрисдикция"[label="е отказал опростената екстрадиция 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"задържан под стража в Берлин (Германия) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

NJ se encuentra en prisión provisional en Berlín (Alemania) desde el 14 de mayo de 2019, en relación con un proceso penal por robo que se sigue contra él en Alemania. Según el tribunal remitente, al ser interrogado el 24 de mayo de 2019, NJ se opuso a la extradición simplificada.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "el tribunal remitente"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"el tribunal remitente"[label="NJ se opuso a la extradición simplificada. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"en prisión provisional en Berlín (Alemania) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

NJ je v rámci trestního řízení pro krádež, které proti němu bylo zahájeno v Německu, od 14. května 2019 ve vazbě v Berlíně (Německo). Podle předkládajícího soudu NJ při svém výslechu dne 24. května 2019 odmítl zjednodušené vydání.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "předkládajícího soudu"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"předkládajícího soudu"[label="odmítl zjednodušené vydání 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"ve vazbě v Berlíně (Německo) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

NJ har siden den 14. maj 2019 været varetægtsfængslet i Berlin (Tyskland) i forbindelse med en straffesag, der er indledt mod ham for tyveri i Tyskland. Ifølge den forelæggende ret nægtede NJ under afhøringen af ham den 24. maj 2019 at erklære sig indforstået med en forenklet udlevering.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "den forelæggende ret"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"den forelæggende ret"[label="nægtede NJ under afhøringen af ham den 24. maj 2019 at erklære sig indforstået med en forenklet udlevering. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"varetægtsfængslet i Berlin (Tyskland) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

NJ befindet sich seit dem 14. Mai 2019 in Berlin (Deutschland) im Rahmen eines in Deutschland gegen ihn eingeleiteten Strafverfahrens wegen Diebstahls in Untersuchungshaft. Nach den Angaben des vorlegenden Gerichts hat er bei seiner am 24. Mai 2019 durchgeführten Vernehmung erklärt, dass er der vereinfachten Übergabe nicht zustimme.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "das vorlegende Gericht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"das vorlegende Gericht"[label="er der vereinfachten Übergabe nicht zustimme. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"Untersuchungshaft in Berlin (Deutschland) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

NJ vahistati 14. mail 2019 Berliinis (Saksamaa) kriminaalmenetluse raames, mis oli Saksamaal tema suhtes algatatud varguse tõttu. Eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohtu sõnul teatas NJ ülekuulamisel 24. mail 2019, et ta ei nõustu lihtsustatud korras üleandmisega.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"Eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus"[label="ei nõustu lihtsustatud korras üleandmisega. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"vahistati 14. mail 2019 Berliinis (Saksamaa) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Ο NJ τέθηκε υπό προσωρινή κράτηση στο Βερολίνο (Γερμανία) από τις 14 Μαΐου 2019, στο πλαίσιο ποινικής διαδικασίας που κινήθηκε κατ’ αυτού στη Γερμανία λόγω κλοπής. Κατά το αιτούν δικαστήριο, ο NJ αρνήθηκε, κατά την εξέτασή του στις 24 Μαΐου 2019, την εφαρμογή της απλοποιημένης διαδικασίας εκδόσεως.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "το αιτούν δικαστήριο"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"το αιτούν δικαστήριο"[label="αρνήθηκε την εφαρμογή της απλοποιημένης διαδικασίας εκδόσεως 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"υπό προσωρινή κράτηση στο Βερολίνο (Γερμανία) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

NJ est placé en détention provisoire à Berlin (Allemagne) depuis le 14 mai 2019, dans le cadre d’une procédure pénale pour vol, engagée contre lui en Allemagne. Selon la juridiction de renvoi, NJ a, lors de son interrogatoire du 24 mai 2019, refusé l’extradition simplifiée.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la juridiction de renvoi"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"la juridiction de renvoi"[label="refusé l’extradition simplifiée. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"en détention provisoire à Berlin (Allemagne) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Osoba NJ od 14. svibnja 2019. smještena je, u okviru kaznenog postupka zbog kaznenog djela krađe koji je protiv nje pokrenut u Njemačkoj, u pritvor u Berlinu (Njemačka). Prema mišljenju suda koji je uputio zahtjev, osoba NJ je tijekom svojeg ispitivanja 24. svibnja 2019. odbila pojednostavljenu predaju.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "sud koji je uputio zahtjev"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"sud koji je uputio zahtjev"[label="odbila pojednostavljenu predaju. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"pritvor u Berlinu (Njemačka) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

NJ è stato sottoposto a custodia cautelare a Berlino (Germania) dal 14 maggio 2019 nell’ambito di un procedimento penale per furto promosso nei suoi confronti in Germania. Secondo il giudice del rinvio, NJ, nel corso dell’interrogatorio del 24 maggio 2019, ha rifiutato l’estradizione semplificata.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "il giudice del rinvio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"il giudice del rinvio"[label="ha rifiutato l’estradizione semplificata. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"custodia cautelare a Berlino (Germania) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Kopš 2019. gada 14. maija, ņemot vērā kriminālprocesu saistībā ar zādzību, kas pret NJ ir uzsākts Vācijā, viņš atrodas apcietinājumā Berlīnē (Vācija). Iesniedzējtiesa uzskata, ka NJ 2019. gada 24. maija nopratināšanas laikā atteicās no vienkāršotas izdošanas.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Iesniedzējtiesa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"Iesniedzējtiesa"[label="atteicās no vienkāršotas izdošanas. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"apcietinājumā Berlīnē (Vācija) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

NJ Berlyne (Vokietija) nuo 2019 m. gegužės 14 d. taikomas suėmimas Vokietijoje pradėtame baudžiamajame procese dėl vagystės. Prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas nurodo, kad per 2019 m. gegužės 24 d. apklausą NJ nesutiko, kad jam būtų taikoma supaprastintos ekstradicijos tvarka.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"Prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas"[label="NJ nesutiko, kad jam būtų taikoma supaprastintos ekstradicijos tvarka. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"NJ Berlyne (Vokietija) nuo 2019 m. gegužės 14 d. taikomas suėmimas 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

NJ a Németországban vele szemben lopás miatt indult büntetőeljárás keretében 2019. május 14. óta előzetes letartóztatásban van Berlinben (Németország). A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság szerint NJ a 2019. május 24‑én tartott kihallgatásán az egyszerűsített kiadatást elutasította.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság"[label="az egyszerűsített kiadatást elutasította. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"előzetes letartóztatásban van Berlinben (Németország) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

NJ inżamm f’arrest preventiv f’Berlin (il-Ġermanja) mill-14 ta’ Mejju 2019, fil-kuntest ta’ proċeduri kriminali minħabba serq, li nfetħu kontrih fil-Ġermanja. Skont il-qorti tar-rinviju, fl-interrogatorju tiegħu tal-24 ta’ Mejju 2019, NJ irrifjuta l-estradizzjoni ssemplifikata.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "il-qorti tar-rinviju"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"il-qorti tar-rinviju"[label="NJ irrifjuta l-estradizzjoni ssemplifikata. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"inżamm f’arrest preventiv f’Berlin (il-Ġermanja) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Sinds 14 mei 2019 is NJ in Berlijn in voorlopige hechtenis geplaatst in verband met in Duitsland tegen hem ingestelde strafvervolging wegens diefstal. Volgens de verwijzende rechter heeft NJ tijdens zijn verhoor op 24 mei 2019 geweigerd in te stemmen met een vereenvoudigde uitlevering.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "de verwijzende rechter"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"de verwijzende rechter"[label="geweigerd in te stemmen met een vereenvoudigde uitlevering. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"Voorlopige hechtenis in Berlijn 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

NJ jest od dnia 14 maja 2019 r. tymczasowo aresztowany w Berlinie (Niemcy) w związku z wszczętym przeciwko niemu w Niemczech postępowaniem karnym o kradzież. Według sądu odsyłającego NJ w trakcie przesłuchania w dniu 24 maja 2019 r. odmówił zgody na uproszczoną ekstradycję.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "sąd odsyłający"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"sąd odsyłający"[label="Brak zgody na uproszczoną ekstradycję 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"tymczasowo aresztowany w Berlinie (Niemcy) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

NJ encontra‑se em prisão preventiva em Berlim (Alemanha), desde 14 de maio de 2019, no âmbito de um processo penal por furto, instaurado contra ele na Alemanha. Segundo o órgão jurisdicional de reenvio, durante o seu interrogatório em 24 de maio de 2019, NJ recusou a extradição simplificada.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "o órgão jurisdicional de reenvio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"o órgão jurisdicional de reenvio"[label="NJ recusou a extradição simplificada. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"prisão preventiva em Berlim (Alemanha) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

NJ se află în arest preventiv la Berlin (Germania) de la data de 14 mai 2019, în cadrul unei proceduri penale pentru furt, declanșate împotriva sa în Germania. Potrivit instanței de trimitere, NJ a refuzat, în cadrul audierii sale din 24 mai 2019, predarea simplificată.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "instanței de trimitere"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"instanței de trimitere"[label="a refuzat, în cadrul audierii sale din 24 mai 2019, predarea simplificată. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"arest preventiv la Berlin (Germania) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

NJ je od 14. mája 2019 vo vyšetrovacej väzbe v Berlíne (Nemecko) v rámci trestného stíhania pre krádež, ktoré bolo začaté proti nemu v Nemecku. Podľa vnútroštátneho súdu NJ počas svojho výsluchu 24. mája 2019 odmietol zjednodušený postup odovzdania.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "vnútroštátny súd"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"vnútroštátny súd"[label="odmietol zjednodušený postup odovzdania. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"vo vyšetrovacej väzbe v Berlíne (Nemecko) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Oseba NJ je od 14. maja 2019 priprta v Berlinu (Nemčija) v okviru kazenskega postopka zaradi tatvine, ki je bil zoper njo začet v Nemčiji. Predložitveno sodišče navaja, da je oseba NJ na zaslišanju 24. maja 2019 zavrnila poenostavljeno izročitev.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Predložitveno sodišče"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"Predložitveno sodišče"[label="zavrnila poenostavljeno izročitev 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"priprta v Berlinu (Nemčija) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

NJ on 14.5.2019 lähtien ollut varkaudesta epäiltynä tutkintavankeudessa Berliinissä (Saksa) häntä vastaan Saksassa vireille pannun rikosoikeudellisen menettelyn yhteydessä. Ennakkoratkaisua pyytäneen tuomioistuimen mukaan NJ kieltäytyi 24.5.2019 kuulustelussa yksinkertaistetusta luovutuksesta.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Ennakkoratkaisua pyytäneen tuomioistuimen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"Ennakkoratkaisua pyytäneen tuomioistuimen"[label="NJ kieltäytyi 24.5.2019 kuulustelussa yksinkertaistetusta luovutuksesta. 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"tutkintavankeudessa Berliinissä (Saksa) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

NJ är sedan den 14 maj 2019 häktad i Berlin (Tyskland) inom ramen för ett straffrättsligt förfarande angående stöld i Tyskland. Enligt den hänskjutande domstolen motsatte sig NJ förenklad utlämning vid ett förhör med honom den 24 maj 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "den hänskjutande domstolen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "NJ"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "NJ"->"den hänskjutande domstolen"[label="motsatte sig NJ förenklad utlämning 24/05/2019"];
  "NJ"->"häktad i Berlin (Tyskland) 14/05/2019"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

In those circumstances, the Kammergericht Berlin (Higher Regional Court, Berlin, Germany) decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:
‘Does the fact that a public prosecutor’s office is required to act on instruction preclude it from effectively issuing a European arrest warrant even in the case where that decision is subject to a comprehensive judicial review prior to the execution of the European arrest warrant?’

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Kammergericht Berlin (Higher Regional Court, Berlin, Germany)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The Court of Justice"[shape=doubleoctagon];

   "The Kammergericht Berlin (Higher Regional Court, Berlin, Germany)"->"Question for a preliminary ruling";
   "Question for a preliminary ruling"->"The Court of Justice";
   "Question for a preliminary ruling"->"Does the fact that a public prosecutor’s office is required to act on instruction preclude it from effectively issuing a European arrest warrant even in the case where that decision is subject to a comprehensive judicial review prior to the execution of the European arrest warrant?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

При тези обстоятелства Kammergericht Berlin (Висш областен съд Берлин, Германия) решава да спре производството и да постави на Съда следния преюдициален въпрос:

„Възпрепятствана ли е прокуратурата от указанията, които я обвързват, да издава валидно европейска заповед за арест дори когато преди изпълнението на европейската заповед за арест това решение подлежи на пълен съдебен контрол?“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The Kammergericht Berlin (Висш областен съд Берлин, Германия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Съда"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The Kammergericht Berlin (Висш областен съд Берлин, Германия)"->"преюдициален въпрос";
  "преюдициален въпрос"->"Съда";
  "преюдициален въпрос"->"Възпрепятствана ли е прокуратурата от указанията, които я обвързват, да издава валидно европейска заповед за арест дори когато преди изпълнението на европейската заповед за арест това решение подлежи на пълен съдебен контрол?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Dadas estas circunstancias, el Kammergericht Berlin (Tribunal Superior Regional de lo Civil y Penal de Berlín, Alemania) decidió suspender el procedimiento y plantear al Tribunal de Justicia la siguiente cuestión prejudicial:

«¿Se opone a la emisión válida de una orden de detención europea por parte de una fiscalía el hecho de que esta se encuentre sometida a instrucciones obligatorias, aunque su decisión esté sujeta a un control jurisdiccional exhaustivo antes de la ejecución de la orden de detención europea?»

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The Kammergericht Berlin (Tribunal Superior Regional de lo Civil y Penal de Berlín, Alemania)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tribunal de Justicia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The Kammergericht Berlin (Tribunal Superior Regional de lo Civil y Penal de Berlín, Alemania)"->"la siguiente cuestión prejudicial";
  "la siguiente cuestión prejudicial"->"Tribunal de Justicia";
  "la siguiente cuestión prejudicial"->"¿Se opone a la emisión válida de una orden de detención europea por parte de una fiscalía el hecho de que esta se encuentre sometida a instrucciones obligatorias, aunque su decisión esté sujeta a un control jurisdiccional exhaustivo antes de la ejecución de la orden de detención europea?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

Za těchto podmínek se Kammergericht Berlin (vrchní zemský soud v Berlíně, Německo) rozhodl přerušit řízení a položit Soudnímu dvoru následující předběžnou otázku:

„Brání státnímu zastupitelství skutečnost, že je vázáno pokyny, v tom, aby platně vydalo evropský zatýkací rozkaz, i když toto rozhodnutí podléhá úplnému soudnímu přezkumu před vykonáním evropského zatýkacího rozkazu?“

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The Kammergericht Berlin (vrchní zemský soud v Berlíně, Německo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Soudnímu dvoru"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The Kammergericht Berlin (vrchní zemský soud v Berlíně, Německo)"->"„Brání státnímu zastupitelství skutečnost, že je vázáno pokyny, v tom, aby platně vydalo evropský zatýkací rozkaz, i když toto rozhodnutí podléhá úplnému soudnímu přezkumu před vykonáním evropského zatýkacího rozkazu?“";
  "„Brání státnímu zastupitelství skutečnost, že je vázáno pokyny, v tom, aby platně vydalo evropský zatýkací rozkaz, i když toto rozhodnutí podléhá úplnému soudnímu přezkumu před vykonáním evropského zatýkacího rozkazu?“"->"Soudnímu dvoru";
  "„Brání státnímu zastupitelství skutečnost, že je vázáno pokyny, v tom, aby platně vydalo evropský zatýkací rozkaz, i když toto rozhodnutí podléhá úplnému soudnímu přezkumu před vykonáním evropského zatýkacího rozkazu?“"->"Brání státnímu zastupitelství skutečnost, že je vázáno pokyny, v tom, aby platně vydalo evropský zatýkací rozkaz, i když toto rozhodnutí podléhá úplnému soudnímu přezkumu před vykonáním evropského zatýkacího rozkazu?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

På denne baggrund har Kammergericht Berlin (den regionale ret i første instans i Berlin, Tyskland) besluttet at udsætte sagen og forelægge Domstolen følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål:

»Er en anklagemyndigheds afhængighed af instruktioner til hinder for, at den gyldigt kan udstede en europæisk arrestordre, også i tilfælde, hvor denne afgørelse er underlagt en omfattende domstolsprøvelse forud for fuldbyrdelsen af den europæiske arrestordre?«

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The Kammergericht Berlin (Kammergericht Berlin (den regionale ret i første instans i Berlin, Tyskland))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Domstolen"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The Kammergericht Berlin (Kammergericht Berlin (den regionale ret i første instans i Berlin, Tyskland))"->"følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål";
  "følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål"->"Domstolen";
  "følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål"->"Er en anklagemyndigheds afhængighed af instruktioner til hinder for, at den gyldigt kan udstede en europæisk arrestordre, også i tilfælde, hvor denne afgørelse er underlagt en omfattende domstolsprøvelse forud for fuldbyrdelsen af den europæiske arrestordre?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

Unter diesen Umständen hat das Kammergericht Berlin (Deutschland) beschlossen, das Verfahren auszusetzen und dem Gerichtshof folgende Frage zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen:

Hindert die Weisungsabhängigkeit einer Staatsanwaltschaft die wirksame Ausstellung eines Europäischen Haftbefehls durch sie auch dann, wenn diese Entscheidung einer umfassenden gerichtlichen Überprüfung vor Vollstreckung des Europäischen Haftbefehls unterliegt?

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The Kammergericht Berlin (Kammergericht Berlin (Deutschland))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "der Gerichtshof"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The Kammergericht Berlin (Kammergericht Berlin (Deutschland))"->"Frage zur Vorabentscheidung";
  "Frage zur Vorabentscheidung"->"der Gerichtshof";
  "Frage zur Vorabentscheidung"->"Hindert die Weisungsabhängigkeit einer Staatsanwaltschaft die wirksame Ausstellung eines Europäischen Haftbefehls durch sie auch dann, wenn diese Entscheidung einer umfassenden gerichtlichen Überprüfung vor Vollstreckung des Europäischen Haftbefehls unterliegt?"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019.
NJ.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.
Case C-489/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Neil asjaoludel otsustas Kammergericht Berlin (Berliini liidumaa kõrgeim üldkohus, Saksamaa) menetluse peatada ja esitada Euroopa Kohtule järgmise eelotsuse küsimuse:

„Kas prokuratuuri seotus antavate juhistega takistab kehtiva Euroopa vahistamismääruse tegemist tema poolt ka siis, kui Euroopa vahistamismääruse täitmisele eelneb vahistamismääruse tegemise otsuse ulatuslik kohtulik kontroll?“

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The Kammergericht Berlin (Berliini liidumaa kõrgeim üldkohus, Saksamaa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Euroopa Kohus"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The Kammergericht Berlin (Berliini liidumaa kõrgeim üldkohus, Saksamaa)"->"„Kas prokuratuuri seotus antavate juhistega takistab kehtiva Euroopa vahistamismääruse tegemist tema poolt ka siis, kui Euroopa vahistamismääruse täitmisele eelneb vahistamismääruse tegemise otsuse ulatuslik kohtulik kontroll?“";
  "„Kas prokuratuuri seotus antavate juhistega takistab kehtiva Euroopa vahistamismääruse tegemist tema poolt ka siis, kui Euroopa vahistamismääruse täitmisele eelneb vahistamismääruse tegemise otsuse ulatuslik kohtulik kontroll?“"->"Euroopa Kohus";
  "„Kas prokuratuuri seotus antavate juhistega takistab kehtiva Euroopa vahistamismääruse tegemist tema poolt ka siis, kui Euroopa vahistamismääruse täitmisele eelneb vahistamismääruse tegemise otsuse ulatuslik kohtulik kontroll?“"->"Kas prokuratuuri seotus antavate juhistega takistab kehtiva Euroopa vahistamismääruse tegemist tema poolt ka siis, kui Euroopa vahistamismääruse täitmisele eelneb vahistamismääruse tegemise otsuse ulatuslik kohtulik kontroll?"[dir=none];
}