mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: German

Da IK Belgien verlassen hatte, stellte die zuständige ausstellende Justizbehörde Belgiens am 27. August 2014 einen Europäischen Haftbefehl zum Zweck der Strafvollstreckung gegen ihn aus. Darin wurden die Hauptstrafe, die Art und rechtliche Würdigung der Straftaten sowie die anwendbaren Gesetzesvorschriften angegeben und kurz der Sachverhalt geschildert. Nicht erwähnt wurde die zusätzliche Strafe, zu der der Betroffene ebenfalls verurteilt worden war.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "zuständige ausstellende Justizbehörde Belgiens"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europäischen Haftbefehl"[shape=trapezium];

  "zuständige ausstellende Justizbehörde Belgiens"->"27. August 2014";
  "27. August 2014"->"Europäischen Haftbefehl";
  "Europäischen Haftbefehl"->"Nicht erwähnt wurde die zusätzliche Strafe, zu der der Betroffene ebenfalls verurteilt worden war. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Estonian

Kuna IK lahkus Belgiast, tegi vahistamismääruse tegemiseks pädev Belgia õigusasutus IK‑le mõistetud karistuse täideviimiseks tema suhtes 27. augustil 2014 Euroopa vahistamismääruse. Euroopa vahistamismääruses mainiti põhikaristust, süütegude olemust ja õiguslikku kvalifikatsiooni ning kohaldatavaid õigusnorme ja kirjeldati faktilisi asjaolusid. Selles ei mainitud lisakaristust, mis asjasse puutuvale isikule samuti oli määratud.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "pädev Belgia õigusasutus"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[shape=trapezium];

  "pädev Belgia õigusasutus"->"27. augustil 2014";
  "27. augustil 2014"->"Euroopa vahistamismääruse";
  "Euroopa vahistamismääruse"->"Selles ei mainitud lisakaristust, mis asjasse puutuvale isikule samuti oli määratud. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Greek

Επειδή ο IK έφυγε από το Βέλγιο, η αρμόδια βελγική δικαστική αρχή έκδοσης εντάλματος εξέδωσε, στις 27 Αυγούστου 2014, ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα σύλληψης του ΙΚ για την εκτέλεση της ποινής. Στο ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα σύλληψης αναγράφονταν η κύρια ποινή, η φύση και ο νομικός χαρακτηρισμός των αδικημάτων καθώς και οι εφαρμοστέες νομικές διατάξεις, και εκτίθεντο τα πραγματικά περιστατικά. Δεν γινόταν μνεία της παρεπόμενης ποινής που είχε επίσης επιβληθεί στον ενδιαφερόμενο.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "αρμόδια βελγική δικαστική αρχή έκδοσης"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα σύλληψης"[shape=trapezium];

  "αρμόδια βελγική δικαστική αρχή έκδοσης"->"27 Αυγούστου 2014";
  "27 Αυγούστου 2014"->"ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα σύλληψης";
  "ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα σύλληψης"->"Δεν γινόταν μνεία της παρεπόμενης ποινής που είχε επίσης επιβληθεί στον ενδιαφερόμενο. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: French

IK ayant quitté la Belgique, l’autorité judiciaire d’émission belge compétente a émis, le 27 août 2014, un mandat d’arrêt européen à l’encontre de ce dernier pour l’exécution de la peine. Le mandat d’arrêt européen mentionnait la peine principale, la nature et la qualification légale des infractions ainsi que les dispositions légales applicables, et il contenait un exposé des faits. Il ne faisait pas état de la peine complémentaire à laquelle l’intéressé avait également été condamné.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "l’autorité judiciaire d’émission belge compétente"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"[shape=trapezium];

  "l’autorité judiciaire d’émission belge compétente"->"émis, le 27 août 2014,";
  "émis, le 27 août 2014,"->"mandat d’arrêt européen";
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"->"Il ne faisait pas état de la peine complémentaire à laquelle l’intéressé avait également été condamné. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Croatian

Budući da je osoba IK napustila Belgiju, belgijsko nadležno pravosudno tijelo izdalo je 27. kolovoza 2014. protiv nje europski uhidbeni nalog radi izvršenja kazne. U njemu su navedeni glavna kazna, priroda i pravni opis kaznenih djela, primjenjive pravne odredbe i prikaz činjenica. U nalogu nije navedena dodatna kazna koja je također izrečena osobi o kojoj je riječ.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "belgijsko nadležno pravosudno tijelo"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europski uhidbeni nalog"[shape=trapezium];

  "belgijsko nadležno pravosudno tijelo"->"27. kolovoza 2014.";
  "27. kolovoza 2014."->"europski uhidbeni nalog";
  "europski uhidbeni nalog"->"U nalogu nije navedena dodatna kazna koja je također izrečena osobi o kojoj je riječ. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Italian

Poiché IK ha lasciato il Belgio, l’autorità giudiziaria emittente belga competente, il 27 agosto 2014, ha emesso un mandato d’arresto europeo nei confronti di quest’ultimo per l’esecuzione della pena. Il mandato d’arresto europeo menzionava la pena principale, la natura e la qualificazione giuridica dei reati nonché le disposizioni normative applicabili, e conteneva un’esposizione dei fatti. Esso non menzionava la pena accessoria alla quale l’interessato era stato parimenti condannato.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "l’autorità giudiziaria emittente belga"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"[shape=trapezium];

  "l’autorità giudiziaria emittente belga"->"27 agosto 2014";
  "27 agosto 2014"->"mandato d’arresto europeo";
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"->"Esso non menzionava la pena accessoria alla quale l’interessato era stato parimenti condannato. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Latvian

Tā kā IK izceļoja no Beļģijas, kompetentā Beļģijas izsniegšanas tiesu iestāde 2014. gada 27. augustā izdeva attiecībā uz viņu Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi soda izpildei. Eiropas apcietināšanas orderī bija minēts pamatsods, noziedzīgo nodarījumu raksturs un juridiskā kvalifikācija, kā arī piemērojamās tiesību normas, un tajā bija iekļauts faktu izklāsts. Tajā netika norādīts papildsods, kas tāpat tika piespriests attiecīgajai personai.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "kompetentā Beļģijas izsniegšanas tiesu iestāde"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[shape=trapezium];

  "kompetentā Beļģijas izsniegšanas tiesu iestāde"->"2014. gada 27. augustā";
  "2014. gada 27. augustā"->"Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis";
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"->"Tajā netika norādīts papildsods, kas tāpat tika piespriests attiecīgajai personai. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Lithuanian

Kadangi IK išvyko iš Belgijos, 2014 m. rugpjūčio 27 d. kompetentinga Belgijos išduodančioji teisminė institucija, siekdama įvykdyti bausmę, dėl jo išdavė Europos arešto orderį. Europos arešto orderyje buvo nurodyta pagrindinė bausmė, nusikalstamų veikų pobūdis ir teisinis kvalifikavimas, taikomos teisės nuostatos ir pateikta faktinių aplinkybių santrauka. Jame nebuvo nurodyta nuteistajam paskirta papildoma bausmė.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Belgijos išduodančioji teisminė institucija"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europos arešto orderis"[shape=trapezium];

  "Belgijos išduodančioji teisminė institucija"->"2014 m. rugpjūčio 27 d.";
  "2014 m. rugpjūčio 27 d."->"Europos arešto orderis";
  "Europos arešto orderis"->"Jame nebuvo nurodyta nuteistajam paskirta papildoma bausmė. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Hungarian

Mivel IK elhagyta Belgiumot, az illetékes belga kibocsátó igazságügyi hatóság a büntetés végrehajtása céljából 2014. augusztus 27‑én európai elfogatóparancsot bocsátott ki ellene. Az európai elfogatóparancs tartalmazta a főbüntetést, a bűncselekmény jellegét és jogi minősítését, az alkalmazandó jogszabályi rendelkezéseket, továbbá a tényállás ismertetését. Nem tartalmazta az érintettel szemben szintén kiszabott mellékbüntetést.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "illetékes belga kibocsátó igazságügyi hatóság"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európai elfogatóparancsot"[shape=trapezium];

  "illetékes belga kibocsátó igazságügyi hatóság"->"2014. augusztus 27‑én";
  "2014. augusztus 27‑én"->"európai elfogatóparancsot";
  "európai elfogatóparancsot"->"Nem tartalmazta az érintettel szemben szintén kiszabott mellékbüntetést. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Maltese

Peress li IK kien telaq mill-Belġju, l-awtorità ġudizzjarja emittenti Belġjana kompetenti ħarġet, fis-27 ta’ Awwissu 2014, mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew fil-konfront ta’ dan tal-aħħar għall-eżekuzzjoni tal-piena. Il-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew kien isemmi l-piena prinċipali, in-natura u l-klassifikazzjoni legali tar-reati kif ukoll id-dispożizzjonijiet legali applikabbli, u kien jinkludi espożizzjoni tal-fatti. Ma kienx isemmi l-piena addizzjonali li għaliha kienet ġiet ukoll ikkundannata l-persuna kkonċernata.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "l-awtorità ġudizzjarja emittenti Belġjana"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[shape=trapezium];

  "l-awtorità ġudizzjarja emittenti Belġjana"->"fis-27 ta’ Awwissu 2014";
  "fis-27 ta’ Awwissu 2014"->"mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew";
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"->"Ma kienx isemmi l-piena addizzjonali li għaliha kienet ġiet ukoll ikkundannata l-persuna kkonċernata. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Dutch

Daar IK België had verlaten, heeft de Belgische bevoegde uitvaardigende rechterlijke autoriteit op 27 augustus 2014 een Europees aanhoudingsbevel tegen hem uitgevaardigd voor de uitvoering van de straf. Het Europees aanhoudingsbevel vermeldde de hoofdstraf, de aard en de wettelijke kwalificatie van de strafbare feiten alsmede de toepasselijke wetsbepalingen en het bevatte een uiteenzetting van de feiten. Daarin werd geen melding gemaakt van de bijkomende straf waartoe de betrokkene ook was veroordeeld.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Belgische bevoegde uitvaardigende rechterlijke autoriteit"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[shape=trapezium];

  "Belgische bevoegde uitvaardigende rechterlijke autoriteit"->"27 augustus 2014";
  "27 augustus 2014"->"Europees aanhoudingsbevel";
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"->"Daarin werd geen melding gemaakt van de bijkomende straf waartoe de betrokkene ook was veroordeeld. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Polish

Ponieważ IK opuścił Belgię, w dniu 27 sierpnia 2014 r. właściwy belgijski wydający nakaz organ sądowy wydał wobec IK europejski nakaz aresztowania w celu wykonania kary. W europejskim nakazie aresztowania zawarto informację o karze zasadniczej, jej rodzaju i kwalifikacji prawnej przestępstw, a także mających zastosowanie przepisach. Przedstawiono w nim także stan faktyczny. Nie zwarto w nim informacji na temat kary dodatkowej, na którą zainteresowany został także skazany.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "właściwy belgijski wydający nakaz organ sądowy"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europejski nakaz aresztowania"[shape=trapezium];

  "właściwy belgijski wydający nakaz organ sądowy"->"27 sierpnia 2014 r.";
  "27 sierpnia 2014 r."->"europejski nakaz aresztowania";
  "europejski nakaz aresztowania"->"Nie zwarto w nim informacji na temat kary dodatkowej, na którą zainteresowany został także skazany. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Portuguese

Tendo IK deixado a Bélgica, a autoridade judiciária de emissão competente belga emitiu, em 27 de agosto de 2014, um mandado de detenção europeu contra ele, para execução da pena. O mandado de detenção europeu mencionava a pena principal, a natureza e a qualificação legal das infrações, bem como as disposições legais aplicáveis, e continha uma exposição dos factos. Não mencionava a pena acessória a que o interessado tinha sido igualmente condenado.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "autoridade judiciária de emissão competente belga"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"[shape=trapezium];

  "autoridade judiciária de emissão competente belga"->"emitiu, em 27 de agosto de 2014,";
  "emitiu, em 27 de agosto de 2014,"->"mandado de detenção europeu";
  "mandado de detenção europeu"->"Não mencionava a pena acessória a que o interessado tinha sido igualmente condenado. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Romanian

Întrucât IK a părăsit Belgia, autoritatea judiciară emitentă competentă din Belgia a emis, la 27 august 2014, un mandat european de arestare împotriva acestuia din urmă pentru executarea pedepsei. Mandatul european de arestare menționa pedeapsa principală, natura și încadrarea juridică a infracțiunilor, precum și dispozițiile legale aplicabile și conținea o expunere a faptelor. Acesta nu menționa pedeapsa complementară la care persoana interesată fusese de asemenea condamnată.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "autoritatea judiciară emitentă competentă din Belgia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat european de arestare"[shape=trapezium];

  "autoritatea judiciară emitentă competentă din Belgia"->"27 august 2014";
  "27 august 2014"->"mandat european de arestare";
  "mandat european de arestare"->"Acesta nu menționa pedeapsa complementară la care persoana interesată fusese de asemenea condamnată. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Slovak

Keďže IK opustil Belgicko, vydal príslušný belgický vydávajúci súdny orgán na túto osobu 27. augusta 2014 európsky zatykač. Európsky zatykač uvádzal hlavný trest, povahu a právnu kvalifikáciu trestných činov, ako aj príslušné právne ustanovenia a popis skutkových okolností. Neuvádzal však doplňujúci trest, na ktorý bola dotknutá osoba tiež odsúdená.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "belgický vydávajúci súdny orgán"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európsky zatykač"[shape=trapezium];

  "belgický vydávajúci súdny orgán"->"27. augusta 2014";
  "27. augusta 2014"->"európsky zatykač";
  "európsky zatykač"->"Neuvádzal však doplňujúci trest, na ktorý bola dotknutá osoba tiež odsúdená. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Slovenian

Ker je oseba IK zapustila Belgijo, je pristojni belgijski odreditveni pravosodni organ 27. avgusta 2014 zoper njo izdal evropski nalog za prijetje zaradi izvršitve kazni. V evropskem nalogu za prijetje je bila navedena glavna kazen, zakonska označba kaznivih dejanj, zakonske določbe, ki se uporabljajo, in dejansko stanje. V njem ni bila navedena dodatna kazen, na katero je bila zadevna oseba prav tako obsojena.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "pristojni belgijski odreditveni pravosodni organ"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "evropski nalog za prijetje"[shape=trapezium];

  "pristojni belgijski odreditveni pravosodni organ"->"27. avgusta 2014";
  "27. avgusta 2014"->"evropski nalog za prijetje";
  "evropski nalog za prijetje"->"V njem ni bila navedena dodatna kazen, na katero je bila zadevna oseba prav tako obsojena. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Finnish

Koska IK oli poistunut Belgiasta, toimivaltainen belgialainen pidätysmääräyksen antanut oikeusviranomainen antoi hänestä 27.8.2014 eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen rangaistuksen täytäntöönpanoa varten. Eurooppalaisessa pidätysmääräyksessä mainittiin päärangaistus, rangaistavien tekojen luonne, niiden oikeudellinen luokittelu ja sovellettavat lainsäännökset sekä selostettiin tosiseikat. Siinä ei mainittu oheisseuraamusta, joka asianomaiselle myös oli määrätty.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "toimivaltainen belgialainen pidätysmääräyksen antanut oikeusviranomainen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[shape=trapezium];

  "toimivaltainen belgialainen pidätysmääräyksen antanut oikeusviranomainen"->"27.8.2014";
  "27.8.2014"->"eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen";
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"->"Siinä ei mainittu oheisseuraamusta, joka asianomaiselle myös oli määrätty. IK."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Swedish

IK lämnade Belgien, varpå den behöriga rättsliga myndigheten där den 27 augusti 2014 utfärdade en europeisk arresteringsorder mot honom för verkställighet av straffet. Den europeiska arresteringsordern angav det huvudsakliga straffet, brottens beskaffenhet och brottsrubricering samt tillämpliga bestämmelser och innehöll en redogörelse för de faktiska omständigheterna. Däremot nämndes inte den kompletterande påföljd som IK också hade dömts till.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "den behöriga rättsliga myndigheten där"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europeisk arresteringsorder"[shape=trapezium];

  "den behöriga rättsliga myndigheten där"->"den 27 augusti 2014";
  "den 27 augusti 2014"->"europeisk arresteringsorder";
  "europeisk arresteringsorder"->"Däremot nämndes inte den kompletterande påföljd som IK också hade dömts till. IK."[dir=none];
    
}