mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Danish

De Forenede Stater anmodede den 14. januar 1999 i henhold til FTB’s artikel 22, stk. 2, DSB om tilladelse til at suspendere anvendelsen af toldindrømmelserne og forpligtelserne i henhold til den almindelige overenskomst om told og udenrigshandel (GATT) af 1994 og den almindelige overenskomst om handel med tjenesteydelser (GATS) over for Fællesskabet og dets medlemsstater, med et samlet beløb for samhandelen på 520 mio. amerikanske dollars (USD).
Under et møde, som blev afholdt fra den 25. januar til den 1. februar 1999, bestred Fællesskabet dette beløb med henvisning til, at det ikke svarede til omfanget af en annullering eller forringelse af De Forenede Staters fordele, og fastholdt, at de i FTB’s artikel 22, stk. 3, fastsatte principper og fremgangsmåder ikke var blevet overholdt. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "De Forenede Stater"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "DSB"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Fællesskabet"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "De Forenede Stater"->"anmodede 14/01/1999";
  "anmodede 14/01/1999"->"DSB";
  "anmodede 14/01/1999"->"anmodede den 14. januar 1999 i henhold til FTB’s artikel 22, stk. 2, DSB om tilladelse til at suspendere anvendelsen af toldindrømmelserne og forpligtelserne i henhold til den almindelige overenskomst om told og udenrigshandel (GATT) af 1994 og den almindelige overenskomst om handel med tjenesteydelser (GATS) over for Fællesskabet og dets medlemsstater."[dir=none];
  "anmodede den 14. januar 1999 i henhold til FTB’s artikel 22, stk. 2, DSB om tilladelse til at suspendere anvendelsen af toldindrømmelserne og forpligtelserne i henhold til den almindelige overenskomst om told og udenrigshandel (GATT) af 1994 og den almindelige overenskomst om handel med tjenesteydelser (GATS) over for Fællesskabet og dets medlemsstater."->"FTB’s artikel 22, stk. 2, DSB"[dir=none];
  "Fællesskabet"->"bestred Fællesskabet dette beløb";
  "bestred Fællesskabet dette beløb"->"anmodede 14/01/1999";
  "bestred Fællesskabet dette beløb"->"at det ikke svarede til omfanget af en annullering eller forringelse af De Forenede Staters fordele, og fastholdt, at de i FTB’s artikel 22, stk. 3, fastsatte principper og fremgangsmåder ikke var blevet overholdt.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Greek

Στις 14 Ιανουαρίου 1999, οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες Αμερικής ζήτησαν από το ΟΕΔ, δυνάμει του άρθρου 22, παράγραφος 2, του ΜΕΔ, τη χορήγηση αδείας για να αναστείλουν έναντι της Κοινότητας και των κρατών μελών της την εφαρμογή δασμολογικών παραχωρήσεων και συναφών υποχρεώσεων που απορρέουν από τη Γενική Συμφωνία Δασμών και Εμπορίου (GATT) του 1994 και από τη Γενική Συμφωνία για τις συναλλαγές στον τομέα των υπηρεσιών (GATS), για ποσό εμπορικών συναλλαγών 520 εκατομμυρίων αμερικανικών δολαρίων (USD).
Κατά τη συνεδρίαση του ΟΕΔ που διεξήχθη από τις 25 Ιανουαρίου 1999 έως την 1η Φεβρουαρίου 1999, η Κοινότητα αμφισβήτησε το ως άνω ποσό, για τον λόγο ότι δεν αντιστοιχούσε στο επίπεδο μερικής ή ολικής αναιρέσεως των οφελών την οποία υπέστησαν οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες Αμερικής και υποστήριξε ότι δεν τηρήθηκαν οι αρχές και οι διαδικασίες που καθορίζονται στο άρθρο 22, παράγραφος 3, του ΜΕΔ. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες Αμερικής"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ΟΕΔ"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "η Κοινότητα"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες Αμερικής"->"ζήτησαν 14/01/1999";
  "ζήτησαν 14/01/1999"->"ΟΕΔ";
  "ζήτησαν 14/01/1999"->"τη χορήγηση αδείας για να αναστείλουν έναντι της Κοινότητας και των κρατών μελών της την εφαρμογή δασμολογικών παραχωρήσεων και συναφών υποχρεώσεων που απορρέουν από τη Γενική Συμφωνία Δασμών και Εμπορίου (GATT) του 1994 και από τη Γενική Συμφωνία για τις συναλλαγές στον τομέα των υπηρεσιών (GATS)."[dir=none];
  "τη χορήγηση αδείας για να αναστείλουν έναντι της Κοινότητας και των κρατών μελών της την εφαρμογή δασμολογικών παραχωρήσεων και συναφών υποχρεώσεων που απορρέουν από τη Γενική Συμφωνία Δασμών και Εμπορίου (GATT) του 1994 και από τη Γενική Συμφωνία για τις συναλλαγές στον τομέα των υπηρεσιών (GATS)."->"του άρθρου 22, παράγραφος 2, του ΜΕΔ"[dir=none];
  "η Κοινότητα"->"αμφισβήτησε το ως άνω ποσό";
  "αμφισβήτησε το ως άνω ποσό"->"ζήτησαν 14/01/1999";
  "αμφισβήτησε το ως άνω ποσό"->"δεν αντιστοιχούσε στο επίπεδο μερικής ή ολικής αναιρέσεως των οφελών την οποία υπέστησαν οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες Αμερικής και υποστήριξε ότι δεν τηρήθηκαν οι αρχές και οι διαδικασίες που καθορίζονται στο άρθρο 22, παράγραφος 3, του ΜΕΔ.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: French

Le 14 janvier 1999, les États-Unis d’Amérique ont demandé à l’ORD, en vertu de l’article 22, paragraphe 2, du MRD, l’autorisation de suspendre l’application à la Communauté et à ses États membres de concessions tarifaires et d’obligations connexes au titre de l’accord général sur les tarifs douaniers et le commerce (GATT) de 1994 et de l’accord général sur le commerce des services (GATS), à raison d’un montant d’échanges commerciaux de 520 millions de dollars américains (USD).
Au cours d’une réunion de l’ORD qui s’est tenue du 25 janvier au 1er février 1999, la Communauté a contesté ce montant, au motif qu’il ne correspondait pas au niveau de l’annulation ou de la réduction des avantages subie par les États-Unis d’Amérique et a soutenu que les principes et les procédures définis par l’article 22, paragraphe 3, du MRD n’avaient pas été respectés. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "États-Unis d’Amérique"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ORD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la Communauté"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "États-Unis d’Amérique"->"ont demandé à l’ORD 14/01/1999";
  "ont demandé à l’ORD 14/01/1999"->"ORD";
  "ont demandé à l’ORD 14/01/1999"->"l'autorisation de suspendre l’application à la Communauté et à ses États membres de concessions tarifaires et d’obligations connexes au titre de l’accord général sur les tarifs douaniers et le commerce (GATT) de 1994 et de l’accord général sur le commerce des services (GATS)."[dir=none];
  "l'autorisation de suspendre l’application à la Communauté et à ses États membres de concessions tarifaires et d’obligations connexes au titre de l’accord général sur les tarifs douaniers et le commerce (GATT) de 1994 et de l’accord général sur le commerce des services (GATS)."->"l’article 22, paragraphe 2, du MRD"[dir=none];
  "la Communauté"->"a contesté ce montant";
  "a contesté ce montant"->"ont demandé à l’ORD 14/01/1999";
  "a contesté ce montant"->"qu’il ne correspondait pas au niveau de l’annulation ou de la réduction des avantages subie par les États-Unis d’Amérique et a soutenu que les principes et les procédures définis par l’article 22, paragraphe 3, du MRD n’avaient pas été respectés.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Italian

Il 14 gennaio 1999 gli Stati Uniti hanno chiesto all’ORC, ai sensi dell’art. 22, n. 2, dell’IRC, l’autorizzazione a sospendere l’applicazione alla Comunità e ai suoi Stati membri di concessioni tariffarie e di obblighi connessi a titolo dell’Accordo generale sulle tariffe doganali e sul commercio (GATT) del 1994 e dell’Accordo generale sul commercio dei servizi (GATS), per un importo di scambi commerciali pari a dollari americani (USD) 520 milioni.
Durante una riunione dell’ORC tenutasi dal 25 gennaio al 1° febbraio 1999 la Comunità ha contestato tale importo, in quanto esso non corrispondeva al grado di annullamento o di riduzione dei vantaggi subito dagli Stati Uniti ed ha sostenuto che i principi e le procedure stabiliti dall’art. 22, n. 3, dell’IRC non erano stati rispettati. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Stati Uniti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ORC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la Comunità"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Stati Uniti"->"hanno chiesto 14/01/1999";
  "hanno chiesto 14/01/1999"->"ORC";
  "hanno chiesto 14/01/1999"->"l'autorizzazione a sospendere l’applicazione alla Comunità e ai suoi Stati membri di concessioni tariffarie e di obblighi connessi a titolo dell’Accordo generale sulle tariffe doganali e sul commercio (GATT) del 1994 e dell’Accordo generale sul commercio dei servizi (GATS)."[dir=none];
  "l'autorizzazione a sospendere l’applicazione alla Comunità e ai suoi Stati membri di concessioni tariffarie e di obblighi connessi a titolo dell’Accordo generale sulle tariffe doganali e sul commercio (GATT) del 1994 e dell’Accordo generale sul commercio dei servizi (GATS)."->"art. 22, n. 2, dell’IRC"[dir=none];
  "la Comunità"->"ha contestato tale importo";
  "ha contestato tale importo"->"hanno chiesto 14/01/1999";
  "ha contestato tale importo"->"esso non corrispondeva al grado di annullamento o di riduzione dei vantaggi subito dagli Stati Uniti ed ha sostenuto che i principi e le procedure stabiliti dall’art. 22, n. 3, dell’IRC non erano stati rispettati.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Maltese

Fl-14 ta' Jannar 1999, l-Istati Uniti ta' l-Amerika talbu lid-DSB, skond l-Artikolu 22(2) tad-DSU, li jiġu awtorizzati jissospendu, fir-rigward tal-Komunità u ta' l-Istati Membri tagħha, l-applikazzjoni ta' konċessjonijiet ta' tariffi u ta' obbligi relatati skond il-Ftehim Ġenerali dwar it-Tariffi u l-Kummerċ (GATT) ta' l-1994 u l-Ftehim Ġenerali tal-Kummerċ fis-Servizzi (GATS), għall-kummerċ li jammonta għal 520 miljun dollaru Amerikan (USD).
Waqt laqgħa tad-DSB li saret bejn il-25 ta' Jannar u l-1 ta' Frar 1999, il-Komunità kkontestat dan l-ammont minħabba li ma kienx jikkorrispondi għall-livell tat-tixjin jew tat-tnaqqis tal-benefiċċji li sofrew l-Istati Uniti ta' l-Amerika u sostniet li l-prinċipji u l-proċeduri stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 22(3) tad-DSU ma kinux ġew rispettati. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "l-Istati Uniti ta' l-Amerika"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "DSB"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "il-Komunità"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "l-Istati Uniti ta' l-Amerika"->"talbu lid-DSB 14/01/1999";
  "talbu lid-DSB 14/01/1999"->"DSB";
  "talbu lid-DSB 14/01/1999"->"jiġu awtorizzati jissospendu, fir-rigward tal-Komunità u ta' l-Istati Membri tagħha, l-applikazzjoni ta' konċessjonijiet ta' tariffi u ta' obbligi relatati skond il-Ftehim Ġenerali dwar it-Tariffi u l-Kummerċ (GATT) ta' l-1994 u l-Ftehim Ġenerali tal-Kummerċ fis-Servizzi (GATS)."[dir=none];
  "jiġu awtorizzati jissospendu, fir-rigward tal-Komunità u ta' l-Istati Membri tagħha, l-applikazzjoni ta' konċessjonijiet ta' tariffi u ta' obbligi relatati skond il-Ftehim Ġenerali dwar it-Tariffi u l-Kummerċ (GATT) ta' l-1994 u l-Ftehim Ġenerali tal-Kummerċ fis-Servizzi (GATS)."->"l-Artikolu 22(2) tad-DSU"[dir=none];
  "il-Komunità"->"kkontestat dan l-ammont";
  "kkontestat dan l-ammont"->"talbu lid-DSB 14/01/1999";
  "kkontestat dan l-ammont"->"ma kienx jikkorrispondi għall-livell tat-tixjin jew tat-tnaqqis tal-benefiċċji li sofrew l-Istati Uniti ta' l-Amerika u sostniet li l-prinċipji u l-proċeduri stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 22(3) tad-DSU ma kinux ġew rispettati.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Dutch

Op 14 januari 1999 hebben de Verenigde Staten van Amerika het DSB overeenkomstig artikel 22, lid 2, DSU om een machtiging verzocht om ten aanzien van de Gemeenschap en haar lidstaten voor een handelsvolume van 520 miljoen Amerikaanse dollar (USD) de toepassing te schorsen van tariefconcessies en daarmee samenhangende verplichtingen ingevolge de Algemene Overeenkomst inzake tarieven en handel (GATT) van 1994 en de Algemene Overeenkomst inzake de handel in diensten (GATS).
Tijdens een bijeenkomst van het DSB van 25 januari tot en met 1 februari 1999 heeft de Gemeenschap dit bedrag betwist, op grond dat het niet overeenkwam met de mate waarin de voordelen van de Verenigde Staten van Amerika waren tenietgedaan of uitgehold, en heeft zij gesteld dat de beginselen en procedures van artikel 22, lid 3, DSU niet in acht waren genomen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Verenigde Staten van Amerika"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "het DSB"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de Gemeenschap"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Verenigde Staten van Amerika"->"om een machtiging verzocht 14/01/1999";
  "om een machtiging verzocht 14/01/1999"->"het DSB";
  "om een machtiging verzocht 14/01/1999"->"om ten aanzien van de Gemeenschap en haar lidstaten voor een handelsvolume van 520 miljoen Amerikaanse dollar (USD) de toepassing te schorsen van tariefconcessies en daarmee samenhangende verplichtingen ingevolge de Algemene Overeenkomst inzake tarieven en handel (GATT) van 1994 en de Algemene Overeenkomst inzake de handel in diensten (GATS).."[dir=none];
  "om ten aanzien van de Gemeenschap en haar lidstaten voor een handelsvolume van 520 miljoen Amerikaanse dollar (USD) de toepassing te schorsen van tariefconcessies en daarmee samenhangende verplichtingen ingevolge de Algemene Overeenkomst inzake tarieven en handel (GATT) van 1994 en de Algemene Overeenkomst inzake de handel in diensten (GATS).."->"artikel 22, lid 2, DSU"[dir=none];
  "de Gemeenschap"->"heeft de Gemeenschap dit bedrag betwist";
  "heeft de Gemeenschap dit bedrag betwist"->"om een machtiging verzocht 14/01/1999";
  "heeft de Gemeenschap dit bedrag betwist"->"het niet overeenkwam met de mate waarin de voordelen van de Verenigde Staten van Amerika waren tenietgedaan of uitgehold, en heeft zij gesteld dat de beginselen en procedures van artikel 22, lid 3, DSU niet in acht waren genomen.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Polish

W dniu 14 stycznia 1999 r. Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki złożyły do DSB, na podstawie art. 22 ust. 2 uzgodnienia, wniosek o upoważnienie ich do zawieszenia w stosunku do Wspólnoty i jej państw członkowskich koncesji i innych zobowiązań wynikających z Układu ogólnego w sprawie taryf celnych i handlu (GATT) 1994 oraz Układu ogólnego w sprawie handlu usługami (GATS), w odniesieniu do wymiany handlowej o wartości 520 milionów USD.
W toku posiedzenia DSB odbywającego się od 25 stycznia do 1 lutego 1999 r. Wspólnota zakwestionowała wysokość tej kwoty, utrzymując, że nie odpowiadała ona skali zniweczenia lub naruszenia korzyści, którego doznały Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki, oraz podniosła, że zasady i procedury określone w art. 22 ust. 3 uzgodnienia nie były poszanowane. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "DSB"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Wspólnota"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki"->"wniosek 14/01/1999";
  "wniosek 14/01/1999"->"DSB";
  "wniosek 14/01/1999"->"upoważnienie ich do zawieszenia w stosunku do Wspólnoty i jej państw członkowskich koncesji i innych zobowiązań wynikających z Układu ogólnego w sprawie taryf celnych i handlu (GATT) 1994 oraz Układu ogólnego w sprawie handlu usługami (GATS)."[dir=none];
  "upoważnienie ich do zawieszenia w stosunku do Wspólnoty i jej państw członkowskich koncesji i innych zobowiązań wynikających z Układu ogólnego w sprawie taryf celnych i handlu (GATT) 1994 oraz Układu ogólnego w sprawie handlu usługami (GATS)."->"art. 22 ust. 2 uzgodnienia"[dir=none];
  "Wspólnota"->"zakwestionowała wysokość tej kwoty";
  "zakwestionowała wysokość tej kwoty"->"wniosek 14/01/1999";
  "zakwestionowała wysokość tej kwoty"->"nie odpowiadała ona skali zniweczenia lub naruszenia korzyści, którego doznały Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki, oraz podniosła, że zasady i procedury określone w art. 22 ust. 3 uzgodnienia nie były poszanowane.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Portuguese

Em 14 de Janeiro de 1999, os Estados Unidos da América pediram autorização ao ORL, ao abrigo do artigo 22.°, n.° 2, do MRD, para suspender a aplicação à Comunidade e aos seus Estados‑Membros de concessões tarifárias e de obrigações conexas a título do Acordo Geral sobre Tarifas e Comércio (GATT) de 1994 e do Acordo Geral sobre o Comércio de Serviços (GATS), à razão de um montante de trocas comerciais de 520 milhões de dólares americanos (USD).
No decurso de uma reunião do ORL que teve lugar de 25 de Janeiro a 1 de Fevereiro de 1999, a Comunidade contestou esse montante, pelo facto de não corresponder ao nível da anulação ou redução de vantagens sofrido pelos Estados Unidos da América, e sustentou que os princípios e procedimentos definidos pelo artigo 22.°, n.° 3, do MRD não foram observados. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Estados Unidos da América"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ORL"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "a Comunidade"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Estados Unidos da América"->"os Estados Unidos da América pediram autorização ao ORL 14/01/1999";
  "os Estados Unidos da América pediram autorização ao ORL 14/01/1999"->"ORL";
  "os Estados Unidos da América pediram autorização ao ORL 14/01/1999"->"pediram autorização ao ORL, ao abrigo do artigo 22.°, n.° 2, do MRD, para suspender a aplicação à Comunidade e aos seus Estados‑Membros de concessões tarifárias e de obrigações conexas a título do Acordo Geral sobre Tarifas e Comércio (GATT) de 1994 e do Acordo Geral sobre o Comércio de Serviços (GATS)."[dir=none];
  "pediram autorização ao ORL, ao abrigo do artigo 22.°, n.° 2, do MRD, para suspender a aplicação à Comunidade e aos seus Estados‑Membros de concessões tarifárias e de obrigações conexas a título do Acordo Geral sobre Tarifas e Comércio (GATT) de 1994 e do Acordo Geral sobre o Comércio de Serviços (GATS)."->"artigo 22.°, n.° 2, do MRD"[dir=none];
  "a Comunidade"->"contestou esse montante";
  "contestou esse montante"->"os Estados Unidos da América pediram autorização ao ORL 14/01/1999";
  "contestou esse montante"->"pelo facto de não corresponder ao nível da anulação ou redução de vantagens sofrido pelos Estados Unidos da América, e sustentou que os princípios e procedimentos definidos pelo artigo 22.°, n.° 3, do MRD não foram observados.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Swedish

Den 14 januari 1999 begärde Amerikas förenta stater i enlighet med artikel 22.2 i överenskommelsen bemyndigande från DSB att upphäva medgivanden gentemot gemenskapen och dess medlemsstater och därmed sammanhängande skyldigheter enligt Allmänna tull- och handelsavtalet (GATT) från 1994 och Allmänna tjänstehandelsavtalet (GATS) motsvarande ett handelsbelopp på 520 miljoner US-dollar (USD).
Under ett möte i DSB som hölls från den 25 januari till den 1 februari 1999 bestred gemenskapen detta belopp med motiveringen att det inte motsvarade omfattningen av de upphävda eller minskade förmåner som drabbat Amerikas förenta stater och gjorde gällande att de principer och förfaranden som anges i artikel 22.3 i överenskommelsen inte hade iakttagits. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Amerikas förenta stater"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "DSB"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "gemenskapen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Amerikas förenta stater"->"begärde 14/01/1999";
  "begärde 14/01/1999"->"DSB";
  "begärde 14/01/1999"->"bemyndigande från DSB att upphäva medgivanden gentemot gemenskapen och dess medlemsstater och därmed sammanhängande skyldigheter enligt Allmänna tull- och handelsavtalet (GATT) från 1994 och Allmänna tjänstehandelsavtalet (GATS)."[dir=none];
  "bemyndigande från DSB att upphäva medgivanden gentemot gemenskapen och dess medlemsstater och därmed sammanhängande skyldigheter enligt Allmänna tull- och handelsavtalet (GATT) från 1994 och Allmänna tjänstehandelsavtalet (GATS)."->"artikel 22.2 i överenskommelsen"[dir=none];
  "gemenskapen"->"bestred gemenskapen detta belopp";
  "bestred gemenskapen detta belopp"->"begärde 14/01/1999";
  "bestred gemenskapen detta belopp"->"det inte motsvarade omfattningen av de upphävda eller minskade förmåner som drabbat Amerikas förenta stater och gjorde gällande att de principer och förfaranden som anges i artikel 22.3 i överenskommelsen inte hade iakttagits.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: English

On 29 January 1999 the DSB decided, at the request of the Community, to refer this matter for arbitration by the original panel, on the basis of Article 22(6) of the DSU, and deferred a decision on the United States of America’s request for authorisation pending determination of the permitted amount of duty to be levied by way of retaliatory measure. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The arbitrators"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "DSB"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The Community"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "The Community"->"DSB"[label="Request"];
   "DSB"->"Refer this matter for arbitration 29/01/1999";
   "Refer this matter for arbitration 29/01/1999"->"The arbitrators";
   "Refer this matter for arbitration 29/01/1999"->"Article 22(6) of the DSU"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Spanish

El 29 de enero de 1999, el OSD, a petición de la Comunidad, decidió someter esta cuestión al arbitraje del grupo especial que había conocido del asunto inicialmente, con arreglo al artículo 22, apartado 6, del ESD, y suspendió la solicitud de autorización de los Estados Unidos de América hasta que se determinara el importe admisible de derechos que podían exigirse como medida de retorsión. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "el grupo especial"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "OSD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la Comunidad"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "la Comunidad"->"OSD"[label="Request"];
  "OSD"->"someter esta cuestión al arbitraje 29/01/1999";
  "someter esta cuestión al arbitraje 29/01/1999"->"el grupo especial";
  "someter esta cuestión al arbitraje 29/01/1999"->"artículo 22, apartado 6, del ESD"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Czech

Dne 29. ledna 1999 DSB rozhodl na žádost Společenství předložit tuto otázku rozhodčímu řízení provedenému původní skupinou odborníků na základě čl. 22 odst. 6 UŘS a suspendoval žádost Spojených států amerických o povolení až do doby určení povolené částky cla na základě odvetného opatření. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "rozhodčímu řízení"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "DSB"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Společenství"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Společenství"->"DSB"[label="Request"];
  "DSB"->"předložit tuto otázku rozhodčímu řízení 29/01/1999";
  "předložit tuto otázku rozhodčímu řízení 29/01/1999"->"rozhodčímu řízení";
  "předložit tuto otázku rozhodčímu řízení 29/01/1999"->"čl. 22 odst. 6 UŘS"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Danish

DSB besluttede den 29. januar 1999 efter anmodning fra Fællesskabet at indbringe spørgsmålet til voldgift ved det oprindelige panel i henhold til FTB’s artikel 22, stk. 6. DSB suspenderede også De Forenede Staters anmodning om tilladelse, indtil den tilladte størrelse af den told, der skulle opkræves som gengældelsesforanstaltning, blev fastsat.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "det oprindelige panel"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "DSB besluttede den 29. januar 1999 efter anmodning fra Fællesskabet at indbringe spørgsmålet til voldgift ved det oprindelige panel i henhold til FTB’s artikel 22, stk. 6. DSB suspenderede også De Forenede Staters anmodning om tilladelse, indtil den tilladte størrelse af den told, der skulle opkræves som gengældelsesforanstaltning, blev fastsat."[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Fællesskabet"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Fællesskabet"->"DSB besluttede den 29. januar 1999 efter anmodning fra Fællesskabet at indbringe spørgsmålet til voldgift ved det oprindelige panel i henhold til FTB’s artikel 22, stk. 6. DSB suspenderede også De Forenede Staters anmodning om tilladelse, indtil den tilladte størrelse af den told, der skulle opkræves som gengældelsesforanstaltning, blev fastsat."[label="Request"];
  "DSB besluttede den 29. januar 1999 efter anmodning fra Fællesskabet at indbringe spørgsmålet til voldgift ved det oprindelige panel i henhold til FTB’s artikel 22, stk. 6. DSB suspenderede også De Forenede Staters anmodning om tilladelse, indtil den tilladte størrelse af den told, der skulle opkræves som gengældelsesforanstaltning, blev fastsat."->"indbringe spørgsmålet til voldgift 29/01/1999";
  "indbringe spørgsmålet til voldgift 29/01/1999"->"det oprindelige panel";
  "indbringe spørgsmålet til voldgift 29/01/1999"->"FTB’s artikel 22, stk. 6"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: German

Am 29. Januar 1999 beschloss das DSB auf Antrag der Gemeinschaft, diese Frage dem ursprünglichen Panel im Schiedsverfahren auf der Grundlage des Artikels 22 Absatz 6 DSU vorzulegen, und setzte die Entscheidung über den Genehmigungsantrag der Vereinigten Staaten bis zur Bestimmung der zulässigen Höhe der als Vergeltungsmaßnahme zu erhebenden Zölle aus.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Schiedsverfahren"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "das DSB"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "die Gemeinschaft"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "die Gemeinschaft"->"das DSB"[label="Request"];
  "das DSB"->"diese Frage dem ursprünglichen Panel im Schiedsverfahren vorzulegen 29/01/1999";
  "diese Frage dem ursprünglichen Panel im Schiedsverfahren vorzulegen 29/01/1999"->"Schiedsverfahren";
  "diese Frage dem ursprünglichen Panel im Schiedsverfahren vorzulegen 29/01/1999"->"Artikels 22 Absatz 6 DSU"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Estonian

29. jaanuaril 1999 otsustas VLO ühenduse taotlusel suunata see küsimus VLK artikli 22 lõike 6 alusel algse vaekogu vahekohtule ja peatas Ameerika Ühendriikide loataotluse kuni vastuabinõuna kohaldatava lubatud maksusumma kindlaksmääramiseni.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "vahekohtule"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "VLO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ühenduse"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "ühenduse"->"VLO"[label="Request"];
  "VLO"->"suunata see küsimus vahekohtule 29/01/1999";
  "suunata see küsimus vahekohtule 29/01/1999"->"vahekohtule";
  "suunata see küsimus vahekohtule 29/01/1999"->"VLK artikli 22 lõike 6"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Greek

Στις 29 Ιανουαρίου 1999, το ΟΕΔ αποφάσισε, κατόπιν αιτήσεως της Κοινότητας, να παραπέμψει το ανωτέρω ζήτημα στη διαιτησία της αρχικής ειδικής ομάδας, βάσει του άρθρου 22, παράγραφος 6, του ΜΕΔ, και ανέστειλε την αίτηση των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών Αμερικής για τη χορήγηση αδείας έως τον προσδιορισμό του εγκεκριμένου ποσού των δασμών που επρόκειτο να επιβληθούν ως αντίποινα. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "η διαιτησία"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ΟΕΔ"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "της Κοινότητας"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "της Κοινότητας"->"ΟΕΔ"[label="Request"];
  "ΟΕΔ"->"να παραπέμψει το ανωτέρω ζήτημα στη διαιτησία 29/01/1999";
  "να παραπέμψει το ανωτέρω ζήτημα στη διαιτησία 29/01/1999"->"η διαιτησία";
  "να παραπέμψει το ανωτέρω ζήτημα στη διαιτησία 29/01/1999"->"του άρθρου 22, παράγραφος 6, του ΜΕΔ"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: French

Le 29 janvier 1999, l’ORD a décidé, à la demande de la Communauté, de soumettre cette question à l’arbitrage du groupe spécial initial, sur le fondement de l’article 22, paragraphe 6, du MRD, et a suspendu la demande d’autorisation des États-Unis d’Amérique jusqu’à la détermination du montant autorisé des droits à prélever à titre de mesure de rétorsion. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "l’arbitrage du groupe spécial initial"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ORD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la Communauté"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "la Communauté"->"ORD"[label="Request"];
  "ORD"->"soumettre cette question à l’arbitrage 29/01/1999";
  "soumettre cette question à l’arbitrage 29/01/1999"->"l’arbitrage du groupe spécial initial";
  "soumettre cette question à l’arbitrage 29/01/1999"->"l’article 22, paragraphe 6, du MRD"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Italian

Il 29 gennaio 1999 l’ORC ha deciso, su richiesta della Comunità, di sottoporre tale questione all’arbitrato del panel originario, a norma dell’art. 22, n. 6, dell’IRC, e ha sospeso la domanda di autorizzazione degli Stati Uniti fino alla determinazione dell’importo autorizzato dei dazi da prelevare a titolo di misura di ritorsione.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "l’arbitrato del panel originario"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ORC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "della Comunità"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "della Comunità"->"ORC"[label="Request"];
  "ORC"->"sottoporre tale questione all’arbitrato 29/01/1999";
  "sottoporre tale questione all’arbitrato 29/01/1999"->"l’arbitrato del panel originario";
  "sottoporre tale questione all’arbitrato 29/01/1999"->"art. 22, n. 6, dell’IRC"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Latvian

1999. gada 29. janvārī pēc Kopienas lūguma SNI nolēma iesniegt šo jautājumu sākotnējās komisijas arbitrāžai, pamatojoties uz VSN 22. panta 6. punktu, un apturēja ASV pieteikuma par atļaujas piešķiršanu izskatīšanu līdz brīdim, kad tiks noteikta summa, ko var atskaitīt kā pretpasākumu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "sākotnējās komisijas arbitrāžai"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "SNI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kopienas"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Kopienas"->"SNI"[label="Request"];
  "SNI"->"iesniegt šo jautājumu sākotnējās komisijas arbitrāžai 29/01/1999";
  "iesniegt šo jautājumu sākotnējās komisijas arbitrāžai 29/01/1999"->"sākotnējās komisijas arbitrāžai";
  "iesniegt šo jautājumu sākotnējās komisijas arbitrāžai 29/01/1999"->"VSN 22. panta 6. punkts"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Lithuanian

1999 m. sausio 29 d. GST pagal Bendrijos prašymą nusprendė pateikti šį klausimą pirminės kolegijos arbitražui, remdamasi SGS 22 straipsnio 6 dalimi, ir sustabdė Jungtinių Amerikos Valstijų prašymo suteikti leidimą nagrinėjimą, kol bus nustatytas leidžiamo muito, kaip atsakomosios priemonės, dydis. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "pirminės kolegijos arbitražui"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "GST"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Bendrijos"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Bendrijos"->"GST"[label="Request"];
  "GST"->"pateikti šį klausimą pirminės kolegijos arbitražui 29/01/1999";
  "pateikti šį klausimą pirminės kolegijos arbitražui 29/01/1999"->"pirminės kolegijos arbitražui";
  "pateikti šį klausimą pirminės kolegijos arbitražui 29/01/1999"->"SGS 22 straipsnio 6 dalimi"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Hungarian

Az DSB 1999. január 29-én a Közösség kérelmére úgy határozott, hogy a vitarendezési egyetértés 22. cikkének 6. pontja alapján e kérdést választottbírósági eljárás lefolytatása céljából az eredeti vizsgálóbizottság elé utalja, és felfüggesztette az Amerikai Egyesült Államok felhatalmazás iránti kérelmét a megtorló intézkedésként kivethető vám engedélyezett mértékének meghatározásáig. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "választottbírósági eljárás"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "DSB"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "a Közösség"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "a Közösség"->"DSB"[label="Request"];
  "DSB"->"e kérdést választottbírósági eljárás lefolytatása céljából 29/01/1999";
  "e kérdést választottbírósági eljárás lefolytatása céljából 29/01/1999"->"választottbírósági eljárás";
  "e kérdést választottbírósági eljárás lefolytatása céljából 29/01/1999"->"a vitarendezési egyetértés 22. cikkének 6. pontja"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Maltese

Fid-29 ta' Jannar 1999, id-DSB iddeċieda, fuq talba tal-Komunità, li jissottometti din il-kwistjoni għall-arbitraġġ mill-grupp speċjali oriġinali, abbażi ta' l-Artikolu 22(6) tad-DSU, u ssospenda t-talba għal awtorizzazzjoni mressqa mill-Istati Uniti ta' l-Amerika sakemm ikun deċiż x'ammont ta' dazju kellu jkun awtorizzat biex jiġi impost bħala miżura ta' ritaljazzjoni. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "grupp speċjali oriġinali"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "id-DSB"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "il-Komunità"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "il-Komunità"->"id-DSB"[label="Request"];
  "id-DSB"->"jissottometti din il-kwistjoni għall-arbitraġġ 29/01/1999";
  "jissottometti din il-kwistjoni għall-arbitraġġ 29/01/1999"->"grupp speċjali oriġinali";
  "jissottometti din il-kwistjoni għall-arbitraġġ 29/01/1999"->"l-Artikolu 22(6) tad-DSU"[dir=none];
}