mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

No segundo processo, que se refere à direção de uma associação criminosa, constituída com o objetivo de cometer roubos, no âmbito da qual BP é também a principal testemunha de acusação, informa que E. Milev esteve preso de 24 de novembro de 2013 a 9 de janeiro de 2018, data em que foi absolvido de todas as acusações contra ele deduzidas, pelo facto de as declarações de BP não terem sido consideradas credíveis pelo órgão jurisdicional búlgaro. No entanto, não foi posto em liberdade.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):

digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "órgão jurisdicional búlgaro" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "órgão jurisdicional búlgaro" -> "No entanto, não foi posto em liberdade.";
    "No entanto, não foi posto em liberdade." -> "O primeiro caso de assalto a um banco com violência";
    "No entanto, não foi posto em liberdade." -> "as declarações de BP não terem sido consideradas credíveis" [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

În prima dintre aceste cauze, referitoare la tâlhăria dintr‑o bancă, ea arată că o instanță bulgară a refuzat plasarea domnului Milev în arest preventiv, pentru motivul că depozițiile principalului martor al acuzării, domnul BP, nu erau credibile. Nicio hotărâre judecătorească pe fond nu a fost încă pronunțată în cauza menționată.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "instanță bulgară" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "instanță bulgară" -> "a refuzat plasarea domnului Milev în arest preventiv";
    "a refuzat plasarea domnului Milev în arest preventiv" -> "În prima dintre aceste cauze, referitoare la tâlhăria dintr‑o bancă";
    "a refuzat plasarea domnului Milev în arest preventiv" -> "Depozițiile principalului martor al acuzării, domnul BP, nu erau credibile." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

V prvej z týchto vecí týkajúcej sa bankovej lúpeže vnútroštátny súd uvádza, že bulharský súd odmietol vziať pána Mileva do väzby z dôvodu, že výpovede hlavného svedka v jeho neprospech, pána BP, neboli vierohodné. Nijaké súdne rozhodnutie vo veci samej ešte nebolo v uvedenej veci vydané.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "bulharský súd" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "bulharský súd" -> "odmietol vziať pána Mileva do väzby";
    "odmietol vziať pána Mileva do väzby" -> "V prvej z týchto vecí týkajúcej sa bankovej lúpeže";
    "odmietol vziať pána Mileva do väzby" -> "Výpovede hlavného svedka v jeho neprospech, pána BP, neboli vierohodné." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

V prvem od teh postopkov, ki se nanaša na rop banke, predložitveno sodišče navaja, da je bolgarsko sodišče zavrnilo odreditev pripora E. Mileva, ker izpovedbe glavne obremenilne priče, osebe BP, niso bile verodostojne. V navedenem postopku še ni bila izdana nobena meritorna sodna odločba.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "bolgarsko sodišče" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "bolgarsko sodišče" -> "bolgarsko sodišče zavrnilo odreditev pripora E. Mileva";
    "bolgarsko sodišče zavrnilo odreditev pripora E. Mileva" -> "V prvem od teh postopkov, ki se nanaša na rop banke";
    "bolgarsko sodišče zavrnilo odreditev pripora E. Mileva" -> "Izpovedbe glavne obremenilne priče, osebe BP, niso bile verodostojne." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Ennakkoratkaisua pyytänyt tuomioistuin toteaa, että näistä ensimmäisessä, joka koskee pankkiryöstöä, bulgarialainen tuomioistuin on kieltäytynyt määräämästä Mileviä tutkintavankeuteen sillä perusteella, etteivät Mileviä vastaan todistaneen päätodistajan BP:n todistajanlausunnot olleet uskottavia. Mainitussa asiassa ei ole annettu vielä mitään tuomioistuinratkaisua asiakysymyksestä.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "bulgarialainen tuomioistuin" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "bulgarialainen tuomioistuin" -> "on kieltäytynyt määräämästä Mileviä tutkintavankeuteen";
    "on kieltäytynyt määräämästä Mileviä tutkintavankeuteen" -> "Ensimmäisessä, joka koskee pankkiryöstöä";
    "on kieltäytynyt määräämästä Mileviä tutkintavankeuteen" -> "Mileviä vastaan todistaneen päätodistajan BP:n todistajanlausunnot eivät olleet uskottavia." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Avseende det första av dessa mål, som rör ett bankrån, har den hänskjutande domstolen angett att en bulgarisk domstol beslutade att inte häkta Emil Milev med motiveringen att uppgifterna från huvudvittnet, BP, inte var tillförlitliga. Ännu har inget domstolsavgörande i sak meddelats i nämnda mål.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "bulgarisk domstol" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "bulgarisk domstol" -> "beslutade att inte häkta Emil Milev";
    "beslutade att inte häkta Emil Milev" -> "det första av dessa mål, som rör ett bankrån";
    "beslutade att inte häkta Emil Milev" -> "Uppgifterna från huvudvittnet, BP, inte var tillförlitliga." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

In the second case, which concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence, in the context of which Mr BP is again the main prosecution witness, the referring court states that Mr Milev was detained from 24 November 2013 to 9 January 2018, when he was acquitted of all charges against him on the ground that the statements of Mr BP were not deemed credible by the Bulgarian court. Mr Milev was not, however, released.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Bulgarian court" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Bulgarian court" -> "Mr Milev was acquitted of all charges against him on the ground that the statements of Mr BP were not deemed credible.";
    "Mr Milev was acquitted of all charges against him on the ground that the statements of Mr BP were not deemed credible." -> "The second case concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence";
    "The second case concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence" -> "Mr BP is again the main prosecution witness" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

Във връзка с второто дело, което е за ръководене на организирана престъпна група за извършване на грабежи, по което основен свидетел на обвинението отново е г‑н ВР, тя отбелязва, че г‑н Милев е задържан под стража от 24 ноември 2013 г. до 9 януари 2018 г., когато е оправдан по всички обвинения, тъй като българският съд не приема показанията на г‑н ВР за достоверни. Г‑н Милев обаче не е освободен.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "българският съд" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "българският съд" -> "г-н Милев е оправдан по всички обвинения, тъй като българският съд не приема показанията на г-н ВР за достоверни.";
    "г-н Милев е оправдан по всички обвинения, тъй като българският съд не приема показанията на г-н ВР за достоверни." -> "второто дело, което е за ръководене на организирана престъпна група за извършване на грабежи";
    "второто дело, което е за ръководене на организирана престъпна група за извършване на грабежи" -> "г-н ВР отново е основен свидетел на обвинението" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

En el segundo proceso, relativo a la dirección de un grupo criminal organizado para cometer robos con violencia, en el que el principal testigo de cargo también es el Sr. BP, el órgano jurisdiccional remitente explica que el Sr. Milev estuvo privado de libertad entre el 24 de noviembre de 2013 y el 9 de enero de 2018, fecha en la que fue absuelto de todos los delitos que se le imputaban, al considerar el tribunal que el testimonio del Sr. BP no era creíble. No obstante, el Sr. Milev no fue puesto en libertad.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "tribunal" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "tribunal" -> "El Sr. Milev fue absuelto de todos los delitos que se le imputaban, al considerar el tribunal que el testimonio del Sr. BP no era creíble.";
    "El Sr. Milev fue absuelto de todos los delitos que se le imputaban, al considerar el tribunal que el testimonio del Sr. BP no era creíble." -> "En el segundo proceso, relativo a la dirección de un grupo criminal organizado para cometer robos con violencia";
    "En el segundo proceso, relativo a la dirección de un grupo criminal organizado para cometer robos con violencia" -> "el principal testigo de cargo también es el Sr. BP" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

Pokud jde o druhé řízení, které se týká vedení organizované zločinecké skupiny vytvořené s cílem spáchat loupeže a v jehož rámci je hlavním svědkem opět BP, předkládající soud uvádí, že E. Milev byl ve vazbě od 24. listopadu 2013 do 9. ledna 2018, kdy byl v plném rozsahu zproštěn obžaloby z důvodu, že bulharský soud nepovažoval výpověď BP za věrohodnou. Na svobodu však E. Milev propuštěn nebyl.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "bulharský soud" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "bulharský soud" -> "E. Milev byl v plném rozsahu zproštěn obžaloby z důvodu, že bulharský soud nepovažoval výpověď BP za věrohodnou.";
    "E. Milev byl v plném rozsahu zproštěn obžaloby z důvodu, že bulharský soud nepovažoval výpověď BP za věrohodnou." -> "Druhé řízení, které se týká vedení organizované zločinecké skupiny vytvořené s cílem spáchat loupeže";
    "Druhé řízení, které se týká vedení organizované zločinecké skupiny vytvořené s cílem spáchat loupeže" -> "hlavním svědkem je opět BP" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

I den anden sag, som omhandler ledelsen af en organiseret og bevæbnet kriminel gruppe med henblik på at begå røverier, inden for rammerne af hvilken BP ligeledes er anklagemyndighedens hovedvidne, har den forelæggende ret forklaret, at Emil Milev var fængslet den 24. november 2013 til den 9. januar 2018, hvor han blev frifundet for alle anklager mod ham, fordi BP’s vidneudsagn ikke blev betragtet som troværdige af den bulgarske ret. Han blev dog ikke løsladt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "den bulgarske ret" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "den bulgarske ret" -> "Emil Milev blev frifundet for alle anklager mod ham, fordi BP’s vidneudsagn ikke blev betragtet som troværdige.";
    "Emil Milev blev frifundet for alle anklager mod ham, fordi BP’s vidneudsagn ikke blev betragtet som troværdige." -> "Den anden sag, som omhandler ledelsen af en organiseret og bevæbnet kriminel gruppe med henblik på at begå røverier";
    "Den anden sag, som omhandler ledelsen af en organiseret og bevæbnet kriminel gruppe med henblik på at begå røverier" -> "BP ligeledes er anklagemyndighedens hovedvidne" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

Im zweiten Verfahren, das die Anführung einer zur Begehung von Raubüberfällen gegründeten Bande betreffe und in dem ebenfalls Herr BP der Hauptbelastungszeuge sei, habe sich Herr Milev vom 24. November 2013 bis zum 9. Januar 2018 in Untersuchungshaft befunden. An letzterem Tag sei er in allen Anklagepunkten freigesprochen worden, weil das bulgarische Gericht die Aussage des Zeugen BP für nicht glaubhaft gehalten habe. Er sei allerdings nicht freigelassen worden.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "bulgarische Gericht" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "bulgarische Gericht" -> "Er sei an letzterem Tag in allen Anklagepunkten freigesprochen worden, weil das bulgarische Gericht die Aussage des Zeugen BP für nicht glaubhaft gehalten habe.";
    "Er sei an letzterem Tag in allen Anklagepunkten freigesprochen worden, weil das bulgarische Gericht die Aussage des Zeugen BP für nicht glaubhaft gehalten habe." -> "Im zweiten Verfahren, das die Anführung einer zur Begehung von Raubüberfällen gegründeten Bande betreffe";
    "Im zweiten Verfahren, das die Anführung einer zur Begehung von Raubüberfällen gegründeten Bande betreffe" -> "Herr BP sei ebenfalls der Hauptbelastungszeuge" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Teise kriminaalasja kohta, mis puudutab röövimiste toimepanemise eesmärgil tegutseva kuritegeliku ühenduse juhtimist ning milles BP on samuti põhitunnistaja, märgib eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus, et E. Milevit peeti vahi all 24. novembrist 2013 kuni 9. jaanuarini 2018: kuupäevani, mil ta mõisteti kõikides talle esitatud süüdistuse punktides õigeks, kuna Bulgaaria kohus leidis, et BP ütlused ei ole usaldusväärsed. E. Milevit siiski vahi alt ei vabastatud.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Bulgaaria kohus" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Bulgaaria kohus" -> "E. Milevit mõisteti kõikides talle esitatud süüdistuse punktides õigeks, kuna Bulgaaria kohus leidis, et BP ütlused ei ole usaldusväärsed.";
    "E. Milevit mõisteti kõikides talle esitatud süüdistuse punktides õigeks, kuna Bulgaaria kohus leidis, et BP ütlused ei ole usaldusväärsed." -> "Teise kriminaalasja kohta, mis puudutab röövimiste toimepanemise eesmärgil tegutseva kuritegeliku ühenduse juhtimist";
    "Teise kriminaalasja kohta, mis puudutab röövimiste toimepanemise eesmärgil tegutseva kuritegeliku ühenduse juhtimist" -> "BP on samuti põhitunnistaja" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στο πλαίσιο της δεύτερης διαδικασίας, η οποία αφορά τη διεύθυνση μιας εγκληματικής οργανώσεως με σκοπό τη διάπραξη ληστειών με χρήση βίας και στην οποία ο BP είναι, επίσης, ο βασικός μάρτυρας κατηγορίας, το αιτούν δικαστήριο εκθέτει ότι ο E. Milev τέθηκε υπό κράτηση από τις 24 Νοεμβρίου 2013 έως τις 9 Ιανουαρίου 2018, ημερομηνία κατά την οποία απηλλάγη από όλες τις κατηγορίες εναντίον του για τον λόγο ότι οι δηλώσεις του BP δεν κρίθηκαν αξιόπιστες από το βουλγαρικό δικαστήριο. Εντούτοις, δεν αφέθηκε ελεύθερος.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "βουλγαρικό δικαστήριο" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "βουλγαρικό δικαστήριο" -> "ο E. Milev απηλλάγη από όλες τις κατηγορίες εναντίον του για τον λόγο ότι οι δηλώσεις του BP δεν κρίθηκαν αξιόπιστες";
    "ο E. Milev απηλλάγη από όλες τις κατηγορίες εναντίον του για τον λόγο ότι οι δηλώσεις του BP δεν κρίθηκαν αξιόπιστες" -> "Στο πλαίσιο της δεύτερης διαδικασίας, η οποία αφορά τη διεύθυνση μιας εγκληματικής οργανώσεως με σκοπό τη διάπραξη ληστειών με χρήση βίας";
    "Στο πλαίσιο της δεύτερης διαδικασίας, η οποία αφορά τη διεύθυνση μιας εγκληματικής οργανώσεως με σκοπό τη διάπραξη ληστειών με χρήση βίας" -> "ο BP είναι, επίσης, ο βασικός μάρτυρας κατηγορίας" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

Dans la deuxième affaire, qui concerne la direction d’un groupe criminel organisé afin de commettre des vols avec violence, dans le cadre de laquelle M. BP est également le principal témoin à charge, elle expose que M. Milev a été détenu du 24 novembre 2013 au 9 janvier 2018, date à laquelle il a été acquitté de toutes les charges retenues contre lui au motif que les dépositions de M. BP n’ont pas été considérées comme étant crédibles par la juridiction bulgare. Il n’a cependant pas été remis en liberté.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "juridiction bulgare" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "juridiction bulgare" -> "M. Milev a été acquitté de toutes les charges retenues contre lui au motif que les dépositions de M. BP n’ont pas été considérées comme étant crédibles.";
    "M. Milev a été acquitté de toutes les charges retenues contre lui au motif que les dépositions de M. BP n’ont pas été considérées comme étant crédibles." -> "The second case concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence";
    "The second case concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence" -> "M. BP est également le principal témoin à charge" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Sud koji je uputio zahtjev navodi da je u drugom predmetu, koji se odnosi na vođenje zločinačkog udruženja kojemu je cilj počinjenje razbojništvâ, u kojemu je BP također glavni svjedok optužbe, E. Milev bio u istražnom zatvoru od 24. studenoga 2013. do 9. siječnja 2018., datuma kada je oslobođen svih optužbi zato što je bugarski sud smatrao BP‑ove iskaze nevjerodostojnima. Međutim, E. Milev nije bio pušten na slobodu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "bugarski sud" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "bugarski sud" -> "E. Milev je oslobođen svih optužbi zato što je bugarski sud smatrao BP‑ove iskaze nevjerodostojnima.";
    "E. Milev je oslobođen svih optužbi zato što je bugarski sud smatrao BP‑ove iskaze nevjerodostojnima." -> "The second case concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence";
    "The second case concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence" -> "BP je ponovno glavni svjedok optužbe" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

Nell’ambito del secondo procedimento, concernente la direzione di un’associazione a delinquere con il fine di compiere rapine, in cui il sig. BP è parimenti il principale testimone a carico, il giudice del rinvio riferisce che il sig. Milev è stato trattenuto dal 24 novembre 2013 al 9 gennaio 2018, data in cui è stato assolto da tutti i capi d’accusa nei suoi confronti in quanto il giudice bulgaro non ha considerato credibile la deposizione del sig. BP. Il sig. Milev tuttavia non è stato rimesso in libertà.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "giudice bulgaro" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "giudice bulgaro" -> "Il sig. Milev è stato assolto da tutti i capi d’accusa nei suoi confronti in quanto il giudice bulgaro non ha considerato credibile la deposizione del sig. BP.";
    "Il sig. Milev è stato assolto da tutti i capi d’accusa nei suoi confronti in quanto il giudice bulgaro non ha considerato credibile la deposizione del sig. BP." -> "Nell’ambito del secondo procedimento, concernente la direzione di un’associazione a delinquere con il fine di compiere rapine";
    "Nell’ambito del secondo procedimento, concernente la direzione di un’associazione a delinquere con il fine di compiere rapine" -> "il sig. BP è parimenti il principale testimone a carico" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Attiecībā uz otro lietu saistībā ar organizētas noziedzīgas grupas vadīšanu, lai veiktu laupīšanas, kurā BP arī ir galvenais apsūdzības liecinieks, tā paskaidro, ka E. Milev ir atradies apcietinājumā no 2013. gada 24. novembra līdz 2018. gada 9. janvārim, proti, datumam, kurā viņš tika attaisnots visās pret viņu celtajās apsūdzībās, pamatojoties uz to, ka Bulgārijas tiesa neuzskatīja BP liecības par ticamām. Tomēr viņš netika atbrīvots no apcietinājuma.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Bulgārijas tiesa" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Bulgārijas tiesa" -> "E. Milev tika attaisnots visās pret viņu celtajās apsūdzībās, pamatojoties uz to, ka Bulgārijas tiesa neuzskatīja BP liecības par ticamām.";
    "E. Milev tika attaisnots visās pret viņu celtajās apsūdzībās, pamatojoties uz to, ka Bulgārijas tiesa neuzskatīja BP liecības par ticamām." -> "The second case concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence";
    "The second case concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence" -> "BP arī ir galvenais apsūdzības liecinieks" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Dėl antros baudžiamosios bylos, kurioje pagrindinis liudytojas taip pat yra BP ir kuri susijusi su vadovavimu plėšimus vykdžiusiam nusikalstamam susivienijimui, šis teismas nurodo, kad E. Milev buvo suimtas nuo 2013 m. lapkričio 24 d. iki 2018 m. sausio 9 d., t. y. nuo momento, kai buvo išteisintas dėl visų jam pareikštų kaltinimų, nes Bulgarijos teismas nusprendė, kad liudytojo BP parodymai nepatikimi. Tačiau E. Milev nebuvo paleistas.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Bulgarijos teismas" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Bulgarijos teismas" -> "E. Milev buvo išteisintas dėl visų jam pareikštų kaltinimų, nes Bulgarijos teismas nusprendė, kad liudytojo BP parodymai nepatikimi.";
    "E. Milev buvo išteisintas dėl visų jam pareikštų kaltinimų, nes Bulgarijos teismas nusprendė, kad liudytojo BP parodymai nepatikimi." -> "Antros baudžiamosios bylos, kurioje pagrindinis liudytojas taip pat yra BP ir kuri susijusi su vadovavimu plėšimus vykdžiusiam nusikalstamam susivienijimui";
    "Antros baudžiamosios bylos, kurioje pagrindinis liudytojas taip pat yra BP ir kuri susijusi su vadovavimu plėšimus vykdžiusiam nusikalstamam susivienijimui" -> "Pagrindinis liudytojas taip pat yra BP" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Ami a második – rablások elkövetése céljából létrehozott bűnszervezet irányítására vonatkozó – ügyet illeti, amelyben szintén BP az elsődleges terhelő tanú, a kérdést előterjesztő bíróság jelzi, hogy E. Milevet 2013. november 24‑től 2018. január 9‑ig fogva tartották, amikor is valamennyi vádpont alól felmentették, mivel BP tanúvallomásait a bolgár bíróság nem tekintette hitelesnek. E. Milevet azonban nem engedték szabadon.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "bolgár bíróság" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "bolgár bíróság" -> "E. Milevet valamennyi vádpont alól felmentették, mivel BP tanúvallomásait a bolgár bíróság nem tekintette hitelesnek.";
    "E. Milevet valamennyi vádpont alól felmentették, mivel BP tanúvallomásait a bolgár bíróság nem tekintette hitelesnek." -> "A második ügy a rablások elkövetése céljából létrehozott bűnszervezet irányítására vonatkozik.";
    "A második ügy a rablások elkövetése céljából létrehozott bűnszervezet irányítására vonatkozik." -> "BP az elsődleges terhelő tanú" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fit-tieni kawża, li tikkonċerna t-tmexxija ta’ grupp kriminali organizzat sabiex jitwettaq is-serq bi vjolenza, li fil-kuntest tagħha BP huwa wkoll ix-xhud prinċipali, din tesponi li E. Milev ġie arrestat mill-24 ta’ Novembru 2013 sad-9 ta’ Jannar 2018, data li fiha huwa nħeles mill-akkużi kollha miġjuba kontrih minħabba li x-xhieda ta’ BP ma kinitx meqjusa bħala kredibbli mill-qorti Bulgara. Madankollu, dan ma kienx inħeles.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "qorti Bulgara" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "qorti Bulgara" -> "E. Milev ġie arrestat mill-24 ta’ Novembru 2013 sad-9 ta’ Jannar 2018, data li fiha huwa nħeles mill-akkużi kollha miġjuba kontrih minħabba li x-xhieda ta’ BP ma kinitx meqjusa bħala kredibbli mill-qorti Bulgara.";
    "E. Milev ġie arrestat mill-24 ta’ Novembru 2013 sad-9 ta’ Jannar 2018, data li fiha huwa nħeles mill-akkużi kollha miġjuba kontrih minħabba li x-xhieda ta’ BP ma kinitx meqjusa bħala kredibbli mill-qorti Bulgara." -> "Fit-tieni kawża, li tikkonċerna t-tmexxija ta’ grupp kriminali organizzat sabiex jitwettaq is-serq bi vjolenza";
    "Fit-tieni kawża, li tikkonċerna t-tmexxija ta’ grupp kriminali organizzat sabiex jitwettaq is-serq bi vjolenza" -> "BP huwa wkoll ix-xhud prinċipali" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

In de tweede zaak, waarin het gaat over de leiding van een georganiseerde criminele groep voor het plegen van diefstallen met geweld en waarbij BP eveneens de belangrijkste getuige à charge is, zet de verwijzende rechter uiteen dat Milev was gedetineerd van 24 november 2013 tot 9 januari 2018, de dag waarop hij van alle aanklachten tegen hem is vrijgesproken omdat de Bulgaarse rechter de verklaringen van BP niet geloofwaardig achtte. Hij is echter niet vrijgelaten.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Bulgaarse rechter" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Bulgaarse rechter" -> "Milev was van alle aanklachten tegen hem vrijgesproken omdat de Bulgaarse rechter de verklaringen van BP niet geloofwaardig achtte.";
    "Milev was van alle aanklachten tegen hem vrijgesproken omdat de Bulgaarse rechter de verklaringen van BP niet geloofwaardig achtte." -> "In de tweede zaak, waarin het gaat over de leiding van een georganiseerde criminele groep voor het plegen van diefstallen met geweld";
    "In de tweede zaak, waarin het gaat over de leiding van een georganiseerde criminele groep voor het plegen van diefstallen met geweld" -> "BP eveneens de belangrijkste getuige à charge" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

W drugiej sprawie, dotyczącej kierowania zorganizowaną grupą przestępczą w celu dokonywania rozbojów, w której BP jest również głównym świadkiem oskarżenia, sąd odsyłający wyjaśnia, że E. Milev był tymczasowo aresztowany w okresie od 24 listopada 2013 r. do 9 stycznia 2018 r., kiedy to został uniewinniony ze wszystkich stawianych mu zarzutów, ponieważ zeznania BP nie zostały przez sąd bułgarski uznane za wiarygodne. Nie został on jednak zwolniony.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "sąd bułgarski" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "sąd bułgarski" -> "E. Milev został uniewinniony ze wszystkich stawianych mu zarzutów, ponieważ zeznania BP nie zostały przez sąd bułgarski uznane za wiarygodne.";
    "E. Milev został uniewinniony ze wszystkich stawianych mu zarzutów, ponieważ zeznania BP nie zostały przez sąd bułgarski uznane za wiarygodne." -> "The second case concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence";
    "The second case concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence" -> "BP jest również głównym świadkiem oskarżenia" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

No segundo processo, que se refere à direção de uma associação criminosa, constituída com o objetivo de cometer roubos, no âmbito da qual BP é também a principal testemunha de acusação, informa que E. Milev esteve preso de 24 de novembro de 2013 a 9 de janeiro de 2018, data em que foi absolvido de todas as acusações contra ele deduzidas, pelo facto de as declarações de BP não terem sido consideradas credíveis pelo órgão jurisdicional búlgaro. No entanto, não foi posto em liberdade.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "órgão jurisdicional búlgaro" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "órgão jurisdicional búlgaro" -> "E. Milev foi absolvido de todas as acusações contra ele deduzidas, pelo facto de as declarações de BP não terem sido consideradas credíveis.";
    "E. Milev foi absolvido de todas as acusações contra ele deduzidas, pelo facto de as declarações de BP não terem sido consideradas credíveis." -> "No segundo processo, que se refere à direção de uma associação criminosa, constituída com o objetivo de cometer roubos";
    "No segundo processo, que se refere à direção de uma associação criminosa, constituída com o objetivo de cometer roubos" -> "BP é também a principal testemunha de acusação" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

În cea de a doua cauză, care privește conducerea unui grup infracțional organizat în scopul săvârșirii unor tâlhării, în cadrul căreia domnul BP este de asemenea principalul martor al acuzării, aceasta arată că domnul Milev a fost deținut de la 24 noiembrie 2013 până la 9 ianuarie 2018, dată la care a fost achitat de toate învinuirile reținute împotriva sa pentru motivul că depozițiile domnului BP nu au fost considerate credibile de instanța bulgară. Cu toate acestea, el nu a fost repus în libertate.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "instanța bulgară" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "instanța bulgară" -> "Domnul Milev a fost achitat de toate învinuirile reținute împotriva sa pentru motivul că depozițiile domnului BP nu au fost considerate credibile.";
    "Domnul Milev a fost achitat de toate învinuirile reținute împotriva sa pentru motivul că depozițiile domnului BP nu au fost considerate credibile." -> "În cea de a doua cauză, care privește conducerea unui grup infracțional organizat în scopul săvârșirii unor tâlhării";
    "În cea de a doua cauză, care privește conducerea unui grup infracțional organizat în scopul săvârșirii unor tâlhării" -> "domnul BP este de asemenea principalul martor al acuzării" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

V druhom prípade, ktorý sa týka vedenia organizovanej zločineckej skupiny s cieľom páchať lúpeže, v rámci ktorého je pán BP tiež hlavným svedkom, vnútroštátny súd uvádza, že pán Milev bol vo väzbe od 24. novembra 2013 do 9. januára 2018, do dňa, kedy bol oslobodený spod všetkých bodov obžaloby z dôvodu, že výpovede pána BP neboli bulharským súdom považované za dôveryhodné. Nebol však prepustený z väzby.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "bulharským súdom" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "bulharským súdom" -> "pán Milev bol oslobodený spod všetkých bodov obžaloby z dôvodu, že výpovede pána BP neboli bulharským súdom považované za dôveryhodné.";
    "pán Milev bol oslobodený spod všetkých bodov obžaloby z dôvodu, že výpovede pána BP neboli bulharským súdom považované za dôveryhodné." -> "The second case concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence";
    "The second case concerns the control of a criminal organisation set up to commit robberies with violence" -> "pán BP je opäť hlavným svedkom obžaloby" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

V drugem postopku, ki se nanaša na vodenje hudodelske združbe, katere cilj je izvajanje ropov in v okviru katere je oseba BP prav tako obremenilna priča, predložitveno sodišče navaja, da je bil E. Milev pridržan od 24. novembra 2013 do 9. januarja 2018, ko je bil oproščen vseh obtožb, ker bolgarsko sodišče izpovedb osebe BP ni štelo za verodostojne. Ni pa bil izpuščen na prostost.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "bolgarsko sodišče" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "bolgarsko sodišče" -> "E. Milev je bil oproščen vseh obtožb, ker bolgarsko sodišče izpovedb osebe BP ni štelo za verodostojne.";
    "E. Milev je bil oproščen vseh obtožb, ker bolgarsko sodišče izpovedb osebe BP ni štelo za verodostojne." -> "V drugem postopku, ki se nanaša na vodenje hudodelske združbe, katere cilj je izvajanje ropov";
    "V drugem postopku, ki se nanaša na vodenje hudodelske združbe, katere cilj je izvajanje ropov" -> "oseba BP prav tako obremenilna priča" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Ennakkoratkaisua pyytänyt tuomioistuin esittää, että toisessa asiassa, joka koskee järjestäytyneen rikollisryhmän johtamista ryöstöjen suorittamista varten ja jonka yhteydessä BP on myös Mileviä vastaan todistava päätodistaja, Milev on ollut vangittuna 24.11.2013–9.1.2018, jolloin hänet vapautettiin kaikista häntä vastaan nostetuista syytteistä sillä perusteella, ettei bulgarialainen tuomioistuin pitänyt BP:n todistajanlausuntoja uskottavina. Mileviä ei kuitenkaan päästetty vapaaksi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "bulgarialainen tuomioistuin" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "bulgarialainen tuomioistuin" -> "Milev vapautettiin kaikista häntä vastaan nostetuista syytteistä sillä perusteella, ettei bulgarialainen tuomioistuin pitänyt BP:n todistajanlausuntoja uskottavina.";
    "Milev vapautettiin kaikista häntä vastaan nostetuista syytteistä sillä perusteella, ettei bulgarialainen tuomioistuin pitänyt BP:n todistajanlausuntoja uskottavina." -> "Toisessa asiassa, joka koskee järjestäytyneen rikollisryhmän johtamista ryöstöjen suorittamista varten";
    "Toisessa asiassa, joka koskee järjestäytyneen rikollisryhmän johtamista ryöstöjen suorittamista varten" -> "BP on myös Mileviä vastaan todistava päätodistaja" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Angående det andra målet, som avser ledningen av en kriminell grupp som bildats i syfte att begå rån, i vilket BP också är huvudvittnet, har den hänskjutande domstolen angett att Emil Milev var frihetsberövad från den 24 november 2013 till den 9 januari 2018, då han friades från alla anklagelser på grund av att den bulgariska domstolen bedömde att BP:s uppgifter inte var tillförlitliga. Han släpptes emellertid inte på fri fot.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "den bulgariska domstolen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "den bulgariska domstolen" -> "Emil Milev friades från alla anklagelser på grund av att den bulgariska domstolen bedömde att BP:s uppgifter inte var tillförlitliga.";
    "Emil Milev friades från alla anklagelser på grund av att den bulgariska domstolen bedömde att BP:s uppgifter inte var tillförlitliga." -> "Angående det andra målet, som avser ledningen av en kriminell grupp som bildats i syfte att begå rån";
    "Angående det andra målet, som avser ledningen av en kriminell grupp som bildats i syfte att begå rån" -> "BP också är huvudvittnet" [dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of tenderer where those costs were not listed separately in the tender — Principle of proportionality.
Case C-309/18. (2019)
Language: English

By a notice of 29 September 2017, the municipality of Montelanico published an open tender procedure with a contract value exceeding the threshold in Article 4 of Directive 2014/24. That notice did not expressly refer to the obligation on operators, under Article 95(10) of the Code of Public Contracts, to list labour costs in their financial tenders.
Six tenderers, which included Gea Srl and Lavorgna, submitted tenders.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
    "The municipality of Montelanico" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Article 4 of Directive 2014/24" [shape=trapezium];
    
    "The municipality of Montelanico" -> "Notice 29/09/2017";
    "Notice 29/09/2017" -> "Published an open tender procedure with a contract value exceeding the threshold." [dir=none];
    "Published an open tender procedure with a contract value exceeding the threshold." -> "Article 4 of Directive 2014/24" [dir=none];
    "Six tenderers" -> "The municipality of Montelanico";
}