mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: English

Both Ms Hakelbracht and Ms Vandenbon gave WTG Retail formal notice, by letter of 10 October 2016, to pay them each a lump sum in damages amounting to 6 months’ salary. Failing conclusion of an agreement on that point, they requested the arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Labour Court of Antwerp, Belgium) to order that undertaking to pay those damages.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Ms Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Ms Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Labour Court of Antwerp, Belgium)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "Ms Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="Letter 10/10/2016"];
   "Ms Vandenbon"->"Letter 10/10/2016";
   "Letter 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
   "Letter 10/10/2016"->"Pay each a lump sum in damages amounting to 6 months’ salary."[dir=none];
   "Ms Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Labour Court of Antwerp, Belgium)"[label="Requested to order that undertaking to pay those damages."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

С писмо от 10 октомври 2016 г. както г‑жа Hakelbracht, така и г‑жа Vandenbon поканват WTG Retail да изплати на всяка от тях фиксирано обезщетение в размер на 6 месечни заплати. Тъй като не се споразумяват по този пункт, те молят Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (първоинстанционен съд по трудови дела Антверпен, Белгия) да осъди това предприятие да плати посоченото обезщетение.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "г-жа Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "г-жа Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (първоинстанционен съд по трудови дела Антверпен, Белгия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "г-жа Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="С писмо от 10 октомври 2016 г. 10/10/2016"];
  "г-жа Vandenbon"->"С писмо от 10 октомври 2016 г. 10/10/2016";
  "С писмо от 10 октомври 2016 г. 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "С писмо от 10 октомври 2016 г. 10/10/2016"->"изплати на всяка от тях фиксирано обезщетение в размер на 6 месечни заплати."[dir=none];
  "г-жа Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (първоинстанционен съд по трудови дела Антверпен, Белгия)"[label="молят Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen да осъди това предприятие да плати посоченото обезщетение.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Tanto la Sra. Hakelbracht como la Sra. Vandenbon intimaron a WTG Retail, mediante escrito de 10 de octubre de 2016, a abonarles una indemnización a tanto alzado correspondiente a seis meses de salario. Al no alcanzar un acuerdo sobre este punto, solicitaron al arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de lo Laboral de Amberes, Bélgica) que condenara a dicha empresa al pago de esa indemnización.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sra. Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sra. Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de lo Laboral de Amberes, Bélgica)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Sra. Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="escrito de 10 de octubre de 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "Sra. Vandenbon"->"escrito de 10 de octubre de 2016 10/10/2016";
  "escrito de 10 de octubre de 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "escrito de 10 de octubre de 2016 10/10/2016"->"abonarles una indemnización a tanto alzado correspondiente a seis meses de salario."[dir=none];
  "Sra. Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de lo Laboral de Amberes, Bélgica)"[label="solicitaron al arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de lo Laboral de Amberes, Bélgica) que condenara a dicha empresa al pago de esa indemnización.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Jak J. Hakelbracht, tak i T. Vandenbon vyzvaly dopisem ze dne 10. října 2016 společnost WTG Retail, aby každé z nich zaplatila paušální částku odpovídající šestiměsíční mzdě. Vzhledem k tomu, že v tomto ohledu nedospěly k dohodě, obrátily se na arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (pracovní soud v Antverpách, Belgie), u něhož se domáhaly, aby této společnosti uložil povinnost zaplatit tuto náhradu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (pracovní soud v Antverpách, Belgie)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="dopisem ze dne 10. října 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"dopisem ze dne 10. října 2016 10/10/2016";
  "dopisem ze dne 10. října 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "dopisem ze dne 10. října 2016 10/10/2016"->"každé z nich zaplatila paušální částku odpovídající šestiměsíční mzdě.."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (pracovní soud v Antverpách, Belgie)"[label="aby této společnosti uložil povinnost zaplatit tuto náhradu.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Både Jamina Hakelbracht og Tine Vandenbon opfordrede ved skrivelse af 10. oktober 2016 WTG Retail til at betale dem hver en fast godtgørelse på et beløb svarende til seks måneders løn. Da der ikke kunne opnås enighed på dette punkt, anlagde de sag ved arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbejdsretten i første instans i Antwerpen, Belgien) med påstand om, at denne virksomhed blev pålagt at betale denne erstatning.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbejdsretten i første instans i Antwerpen, Belgien))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="skrivelse af 10. oktober 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"skrivelse af 10. oktober 2016 10/10/2016";
  "skrivelse af 10. oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "skrivelse af 10. oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"betale dem hver en fast godtgørelse på et beløb svarende til seks måneders løn.."[dir=none];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbejdsretten i første instans i Antwerpen, Belgien))"[label="Påstand om, at denne virksomhed blev pålagt at betale denne erstatning.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: German

Frau Hakelbracht und Frau Vandenbon forderten WTG Retail mit Schreiben vom 10. Oktober 2016 auf, ihnen jeweils einen Pauschalbetrag in Höhe von sechs Monaten Lohn als Entschädigung zu zahlen. Mangels Einigung erhoben sie bei der Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Arbeitsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien) gegen dieses Unternehmen eine Klage auf Zahlung dieser Entschädigung.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Frau Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Frau Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Arbeitsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Frau Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="Schreiben vom 10. Oktober 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "Frau Vandenbon"->"Schreiben vom 10. Oktober 2016 10/10/2016";
  "Schreiben vom 10. Oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "Schreiben vom 10. Oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"ihnen jeweils einen Pauschalbetrag in Höhe von sechs Monaten Lohn als Entschädigung zu zahlen.."[dir=none];
  "Frau Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Arbeitsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien)"[label="forderten WTG Retail mit Schreiben vom 10. Oktober 2016 auf, ihnen jeweils einen Pauschalbetrag in Höhe von sechs Monaten Lohn als Entschädigung zu zahlen.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Nii J. Hakelbracht kui ka T. Vandenbon esitasid WTG Retailile 10. oktoobri 2016. aasta kirjaga võlanõude, milles kumbki nõudis, et talle makstaks kuue kuu töötasu suurune kindlasummaline hüvitis. Kuna selles osas kokkuleppele ei jõutud, esitasid nad arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpenile (Antwerpeni töökohus, Belgia) nõude sellelt ettevõtjalt mainitud hüvitise väljamõistmiseks.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpeni töökohus, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="10. oktoobri 2016. aasta kirjaga 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"10. oktoobri 2016. aasta kirjaga 10/10/2016";
  "10. oktoobri 2016. aasta kirjaga 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "10. oktoobri 2016. aasta kirjaga 10/10/2016"->"makstaks kuue kuu töötasu suurune kindlasummaline hüvitis."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpeni töökohus, Belgia)"[label="nõude sellelt ettevõtjalt mainitud hüvitise väljamõistmiseks.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Τόσο η J. Hakelbracht όσο και η Τ. Vandenbon όχλησαν τη WTG Retail, με έγγραφο της 10ης Οκτωβρίου 2016, ζητώντας να καταβληθεί σε καθεμία εξ αυτών κατ’ αποκοπήν αποζημίωση ποσού αντιστοιχούντος σε μισθούς έξι μηνών. Δεδομένου ότι δεν κατόρθωσαν να επιτύχουν συμφωνία επί του θέματος αυτού, ζήτησαν από το arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (πρωτοβάθμιο δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο) να υποχρεώσει την εν λόγω επιχείρηση να καταβάλει την αποζημίωση αυτήν.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Τ. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Τ. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (πρωτοβάθμιο δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Τ. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="έγγραφο 10/10/2016"];
  "Τ. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"έγγραφο 10/10/2016";
  "έγγραφο 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "έγγραφο 10/10/2016"->"καταβληθεί σε καθεμία εξ αυτών κατ’ αποκοπήν αποζημίωση ποσού αντιστοιχούντος σε μισθούς έξι μηνών."[dir=none];
  "Τ. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (πρωτοβάθμιο δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο)"[label="ζήτησαν από το arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (πρωτοβάθμιο δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο) να υποχρεώσει την εν λόγω επιχείρηση να καταβάλει την αποζημίωση αυτήν.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: French

Tant Mme Hakelbracht que Mme Vandenbon ont mis en demeure WTG Retail, par lettre du 10 octobre 2016, de leur verser à chacune une indemnité forfaitaire d’un montant correspondant à six mois de salaire. À défaut d’avoir pu conclure un accord sur ce point, elles ont demandé à l’arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal du travail d’Anvers, Belgique) de condamner cette entreprise au paiement de cette indemnité.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Mme Hakelbracht, Mme Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Mme Hakelbracht, Mme Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal du travail d’Anvers, Belgique)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Mme Hakelbracht, Mme Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="lettre du 10 octobre 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "Mme Hakelbracht, Mme Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"lettre du 10 octobre 2016 10/10/2016";
  "lettre du 10 octobre 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "lettre du 10 octobre 2016 10/10/2016"->"leur verser à chacune une indemnité forfaitaire d’un montant correspondant à six mois de salaire."[dir=none];
  "Mme Hakelbracht, Mme Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal du travail d’Anvers, Belgique)"[label="elles ont demandé à l’arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal du travail d’Anvers, Belgique) de condamner cette entreprise au paiement de cette indemnité.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

J. Hakelbracht i T. Vandenbon pismom opomene od 10. listopada 2016. zatražile su od društva WTG Retail da svakoj pojedinačno isplati paušalnu naknadu štete u iznosu od šest mjesečnih plaća. Budući da u tom smislu nije mogao biti postignut sporazum, one su zatražile od arbeidsrechtbanka Antwerpen (Radni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija) da tom poduzeću naloži plaćanje te naknade štete.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht i T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht i T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Radni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht i T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="pismom opomene od 10. listopada 2016. 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht i T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"pismom opomene od 10. listopada 2016. 10/10/2016";
  "pismom opomene od 10. listopada 2016. 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "pismom opomene od 10. listopada 2016. 10/10/2016"->"isplati paušalnu naknadu štete u iznosu od šest mjesečnih plaća."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht i T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Radni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija)"[label="Zatražile su od arbeidsrechtbanka Antwerpen (Radni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija) da tom poduzeću naloži plaćanje te naknade štete.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Sia la sig.ra Hakelbracht che la sig.ra Vandenbon hanno ingiunto alla WTG Retail, con lettera di diffida del 10 ottobre 2016, di pagare a ciascuna un’indennità di licenziamento forfettaria di importo pari a sei mesi di stipendio. Non essendo riuscite a giungere a un accordo su tale punto, esse hanno chiesto all’arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale del lavoro di Anversa, Belgio) di condannare tale impresa al pagamento di detta indennità.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sig.ra Hakelbracht, sig.ra Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sig.ra Hakelbracht, sig.ra Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale del lavoro di Anversa, Belgio)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "sig.ra Hakelbracht, sig.ra Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="lettera di diffida del 10 ottobre 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "sig.ra Hakelbracht, sig.ra Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"lettera di diffida del 10 ottobre 2016 10/10/2016";
  "lettera di diffida del 10 ottobre 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "lettera di diffida del 10 ottobre 2016 10/10/2016"->"pagare a ciascuna un’indennità di licenziamento forfettaria di importo pari a sei mesi di stipendio.."[dir=none];
  "sig.ra Hakelbracht, sig.ra Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale del lavoro di Anversa, Belgio)"[label="hanno chiesto all’arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale del lavoro di Anversa, Belgio) di condannare tale impresa al pagamento di detta indennità.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Gan J. Hakelbracht, gan T. Vandenbon ar 2016. gada 10. oktobra vēstuli aicināja WTG Retail pārskaitīt katrai no viņām vienreizēju kompensāciju, kas atbilst sešu mēnešu algai. Nespēdamas panāk vienošanos šajā jautājumā, viņas lūdza arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpenes Darba lietu tiesa, Beļģija) piespriest šim uzņēmumam izmaksāt minēto kompensāciju.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpenes Darba lietu tiesa, Beļģija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="2016. gada 10. oktobra vēstuli 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"2016. gada 10. oktobra vēstuli 10/10/2016";
  "2016. gada 10. oktobra vēstuli 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "2016. gada 10. oktobra vēstuli 10/10/2016"->"pārskaitīt katrai no viņām vienreizēju kompensāciju, kas atbilst sešu mēnešu algai."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpenes Darba lietu tiesa, Beļģija)"[label="lūdza arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpenes Darba lietu tiesa, Beļģija) piespriest šim uzņēmumam izmaksāt minēto kompensāciju.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2016 m. spalio 10 d. laišku J. Hakelbracht ir T. Vandenbon pareikalavo iš WTG Retail kiekvienai iš jų sumokėti vienkartinę šešių mėnesių darbo užmokesčio dydžio išmoką kaip žalos atlyginimą. Kadangi dėl šio klausimo nepavyko susitarti, jos paprašė Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpeno darbo teismas, Belgija) priteisti iš šios įmonės tą išmoką.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht ir T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht ir T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpeno darbo teismas, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht ir T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="laišku 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht ir T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"laišku 10/10/2016";
  "laišku 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "laišku 10/10/2016"->"kiekvienai iš jų sumokėti vienkartinę šešių mėnesių darbo užmokesčio dydžio išmoką kaip žalos atlyginimą."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht ir T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpeno darbo teismas, Belgija)"[label="paprašė Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpeno darbo teismas, Belgija) priteisti iš šios įmonės tą išmoką.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Mind J. Hakelbracht, mind pedig T. Vandenbon arra szólította fel a WTG Retailt a 2016. október 10‑i levélben, hogy az utóbbi mindegyikőjüknek fizessen hat havi munkabérnek megfelelő összegű átalány‑kártérítést. Mivel nem tudtak e tekintetben megállapodást kötni, azt kérték az arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpentől (antwerpeni munkaügyi bíróság, Belgium), hogy az említett vállalkozást kötelezze e kártérítés megfizetésére.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (antwerpeni munkaügyi bíróság, Belgium)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="2016. október 10‑i levélben 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"2016. október 10‑i levélben 10/10/2016";
  "2016. október 10‑i levélben 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "2016. október 10‑i levélben 10/10/2016"->"Mind J. Hakelbracht, mind pedig T. Vandenbon arra szólította fel a WTG Retailt a 2016. október 10‑i levélben, hogy az utóbbi mindegyikőjüknek fizessen hat havi munkabérnek megfelelő összegű átalány‑kártérítést.."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (antwerpeni munkaügyi bíróság, Belgium)"[label="azt kérték az arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpentől (antwerpeni munkaügyi bíróság, Belgium), hogy az említett vállalkozást kötelezze e kártérítés megfizetésére.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Kemm J. Hakelbracht kif ukoll T. Vandenbon intimaw lil WTG Retail, permezz ta’ ittra tal-10 ta’ Ottubru 2016, sabiex tħallashom rispettivament kumpens fiss f’ammont li jikkorrispondi għal salarju ta’ sitt xhur. Billi ma setgħux jikkonkludu ftehim dwar dan il-punt, huma talbu lill-arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (il-Qorti tax-Xogħol ta’ Antwerpen, il-Belġju) tikkundanna lil din l-impriża għall-ħlas ta’ dan il-kumpens.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The text doesn't seem to contain the Maltese equivalent for"Ms". Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The text doesn't seem to contain the Maltese equivalent for"Ms". Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (il-Qorti tax-Xogħol ta’ Antwerpen, il-Belġju)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The text doesn't seem to contain the Maltese equivalent for"Ms". Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="ittra 10/10/2016"];
  "The text doesn't seem to contain the Maltese equivalent for"Ms". Vandenbon"->"ittra 10/10/2016";
  "ittra 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "ittra 10/10/2016"->"tħallashom rispettivament kumpens fiss f’ammont li jikkorrispondi għal salarju ta’ sitt xhur."[dir=none];
  "The text doesn't seem to contain the Maltese equivalent for"Ms". Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (il-Qorti tax-Xogħol ta’ Antwerpen, il-Belġju)"[label="talbu lill-arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (il-Qorti tax-Xogħol ta’ Antwerpen, il-Belġju) tikkundanna lil din l-impriża għall-ħlas ta’ dan il-kumpens.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Zowel Hakelbracht als Vandenbon heeft bij brief van 10 oktober 2016 WTG Retail in gebreke gesteld om elk van hen een forfaitaire schadevergoeding te betalen gelijk aan zes maanden loon. Aangezien op dit punt geen akkoord kon worden bereikt, hebben zij de arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (België) verzocht die onderneming te veroordelen tot betaling van die schadevergoeding.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Mevrouw Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Mevrouw Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (België))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Mevrouw Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="brief van 10 oktober 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "Mevrouw Vandenbon"->"brief van 10 oktober 2016 10/10/2016";
  "brief van 10 oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "brief van 10 oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"om elk van hen een forfaitaire schadevergoeding te betalen gelijk aan zes maanden loon.."[dir=none];
  "Mevrouw Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (België))"[label="hebben zij de arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (België) verzocht die onderneming te veroordelen tot betaling van die schadevergoeding.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Pismem z dnia 10 października 2016 r. zarówno J. Hakelbracht, jak i T. Vandenbon wezwały WTG Retail do zapłaty ryczałtowego odszkodowania w wysokości równej 6-miesięcznemu wynagrodzeniu. Ponieważ strony nie zdołały osiągnąć porozumienia w tej kwestii, J. Hakelbracht i T. Vandenbon wniosły powództwo do arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (sądu pracy w Antwerpii, Belgia), domagając się zasądzenia od tego przedsiębiorstwa zapłaty odszkodowania na ich rzecz.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (sądu pracy w Antwerpii, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="Pismem z dnia 10 października 2016 r. 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Pismem z dnia 10 października 2016 r. 10/10/2016";
  "Pismem z dnia 10 października 2016 r. 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "Pismem z dnia 10 października 2016 r. 10/10/2016"->"zapłaty ryczałtowego odszkodowania w wysokości równej 6-miesięcznemu wynagrodzeniu."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (sądu pracy w Antwerpii, Belgia)"[label="Domagając się zasądzenia od tego przedsiębiorstwa zapłaty odszkodowania na ich rzecz.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Tanto J. Hakelbracht como T. Vandenbon interpelaram a WTG Retail, por carta de 10 de outubro de 2016, para pagar a cada uma delas uma indemnização fixa num montante correspondente a seis meses de remuneração. Não tendo chegado a acordo sobre este ponto, pediram ao arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal do Trabalho de Antuérpia, Bélgica) que condenasse essa empresa no pagamento dessa indemnização.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal do Trabalho de Antuérpia, Bélgica)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="carta de 10 de outubro de 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"carta de 10 de outubro de 2016 10/10/2016";
  "carta de 10 de outubro de 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "carta de 10 de outubro de 2016 10/10/2016"->"pagar a cada uma delas uma indemnização fixa num montante correspondente a seis meses de remuneração.."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal do Trabalho de Antuérpia, Bélgica)"[label="Pediram ao arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal do Trabalho de Antuérpia, Bélgica) que condenasse essa empresa no pagamento dessa indemnização.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Atât doamna Hakelbracht, cât și doamna Vandenbon au pus în întârziere WTG Retail, prin scrisoarea din 10 octombrie 2016, solicitând plata unei indemnizații forfetare într‑un cuantum egal cu salariul pe șase luni. Întrucât nu au putut încheia un acord cu privire la acest aspect, ele au solicitat arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Litigii de Muncă din Antwerpen, Belgia) obligarea acestei întreprinderi la plata acestei indemnizații.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "doamna Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "doamna Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Litigii de Muncă din Antwerpen, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "doamna Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="scrisoarea din 10 octombrie 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "doamna Vandenbon"->"scrisoarea din 10 octombrie 2016 10/10/2016";
  "scrisoarea din 10 octombrie 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "scrisoarea din 10 octombrie 2016 10/10/2016"->"plata unei indemnizații forfetare într‑un cuantum egal cu salariul pe șase luni."[dir=none];
  "doamna Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Litigii de Muncă din Antwerpen, Belgia)"[label="au solicitat arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Litigii de Muncă din Antwerpen, Belgia) obligarea acestei întreprinderi la plata acestei indemnizații.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Pani Hakelbrachtová, ako aj pani Vandenbonová vyzvali WTG Retail listom z 10. októbra 2016, aby každej z nich vyplatil paušálnu náhradu škody v sume zodpovedajúcej platu za šesť mesiacov. Keďže v tomto bode nemohli dospieť k dohode, žiadali Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Pracovný súd Antverpy, Belgicko), aby tejto spoločnosti uložil zaplatiť túto náhradu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Pani Hakelbrachtová, pani Vandenbonová Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Pani Hakelbrachtová, pani Vandenbonová Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Pracovný súd Antverpy, Belgicko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Pani Hakelbrachtová, pani Vandenbonová Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="listom 10/10/2016"];
  "Pani Hakelbrachtová, pani Vandenbonová Vandenbon"->"listom 10/10/2016";
  "listom 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "listom 10/10/2016"->"aby každej z nich vyplatil paušálnu náhradu škody v sume zodpovedajúcej platu za šesť mesiacov.."[dir=none];
  "Pani Hakelbrachtová, pani Vandenbonová Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Pracovný súd Antverpy, Belgicko)"[label="žiadali Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Pracovný súd Antverpy, Belgicko), aby tejto spoločnosti uložil zaplatiť túto náhradu.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Tako J. Hakelbracht kot T. Vandenbon sta od družbe WTG Retail z dopisom z dne 10. oktobra 2016 zahtevali, naj vsaki izplača pavšalno odškodnino v znesku, ki ustreza šestmesečni plači. Ker o tej točki niso sklenili dogovora, sta pri arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (delovno sodišče v Antwerpnu, Belgija) zahtevali, naj to sodišče tej družbi naloži plačilo odškodnine.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (delovno sodišče v Antwerpnu, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="dopisom 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"dopisom 10/10/2016";
  "dopisom 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "dopisom 10/10/2016"->"vsaki izplača pavšalno odškodnino v znesku, ki ustreza šestmesečni plači.."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (delovno sodišče v Antwerpnu, Belgija)"[label="Zahtevali, naj to sodišče tej družbi naloži plačilo odškodnine.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Sekä Hakelbracht että Vandenbon vaativat 10.10.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellään WTG Retailia maksamaan kummallekin kiinteämääräisen korvauksen, joka vastaa kuuden kuukauden palkkaa. Koska he eivät päässeet tältä osin sopimukseen, he vaativat arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpeniä (Antwerpenin työoikeudellisten asioiden alioikeus, Belgia) velvoittamaan kyseisen yrityksen maksamaan tämän korvauksen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpenin työoikeudellisten asioiden alioikeus, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="10.10.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellään 10/10/2016"];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"10.10.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellään 10/10/2016";
  "10.10.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellään 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "10.10.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellään 10/10/2016"->"maksamaan kummallekin kiinteämääräisen korvauksen, joka vastaa kuuden kuukauden palkkaa."[dir=none];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpenin työoikeudellisten asioiden alioikeus, Belgia)"[label="Vaativat arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpeniä (Antwerpenin työoikeudellisten asioiden alioikeus, Belgia) velvoittamaan kyseisen yrityksen maksamaan tämän korvauksen.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Såväl Jamina Hakelbracht som Tine Vandenbon förelade WTG Retail i skrivelse av den 10 oktober 2016 att utbetala ersättning till var och en av dem med ett engångsbelopp motsvarande sex månadslöner. Då någon överenskommelse inte nåddes väckte de talan vid arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbetsdomstolen i Antwerpen, Belgien) med yrkande att företaget skulle förpliktas att utge denna ersättning.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbetsdomstolen i Antwerpen, Belgien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="skrivelse 10/10/2016"];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"skrivelse 10/10/2016";
  "skrivelse 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "skrivelse 10/10/2016"->"utbetala ersättning till var och en av dem med ett engångsbelopp motsvarande sex månadslöner."[dir=none];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbetsdomstolen i Antwerpen, Belgien)"[label="med yrkande att företaget skulle förpliktas att utge denna ersättning.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: English

Both Ms Hakelbracht and Ms Vandenbon gave WTG Retail formal notice, by letter of 10 October 2016, to pay them each a lump sum in damages amounting to 6 months’ salary. Failing conclusion of an agreement on that point, they requested the arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Labour Court of Antwerp, Belgium) to order that undertaking to pay those damages.
As is apparent from the order for reference, it is common ground in the main proceedings that Ms Hakelbracht was indeed the victim of direct discrimination on grounds of sex, which is why the referring court awarded her damages on that basis.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Ms Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Ms Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Labour Court of Antwerp, Belgium)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "Ms Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="Letter 10/10/2016"];
   "Ms Vandenbon"->"Letter 10/10/2016";
   "Letter 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
   "Letter 10/10/2016"->"Pay each a lump sum in damages amounting to 6 months’ salary"[dir=none];
   "Ms Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Labour Court of Antwerp, Belgium)"[label="Requested to order that undertaking to pay those damages."];
   "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Labour Court of Antwerp, Belgium)"->"Ms Hakelbracht"[label="Awarded damages"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

С писмо от 10 октомври 2016 г. както г‑жа Hakelbracht, така и г‑жа Vandenbon поканват WTG Retail да изплати на всяка от тях фиксирано обезщетение в размер на 6 месечни заплати. Тъй като не се споразумяват по този пункт, те молят Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (първоинстанционен съд по трудови дела Антверпен, Белгия) да осъди това предприятие да плати посоченото обезщетение.
Видно от акта за преюдициално запитване, по делото в главното производство е безспорно, че г‑жа Hakelbracht действително е жертва на пряка дискриминация, основана на пола — причината, поради която запитващата юрисдикция ѝ е присъдила обезщетение на това основание.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "г‑жа Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "г‑жа Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (първоинстанционен съд по трудови дела Антверпен, Белгия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "г‑жа Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="С писмо от 10 октомври 2016 г. 10/10/2016"];
  "г‑жа Vandenbon"->"С писмо от 10 октомври 2016 г. 10/10/2016";
  "С писмо от 10 октомври 2016 г. 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "С писмо от 10 октомври 2016 г. 10/10/2016"->"да изплати на всяка от тях фиксирано обезщетение в размер на 6 месечни заплати"[dir=none];
  "г‑жа Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (първоинстанционен съд по трудови дела Антверпен, Белгия)"[label="молят Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (първоинстанционен съд по трудови дела Антверпен, Белгия) да осъди това предприятие да плати посоченото обезщетение.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (първоинстанционен съд по трудови дела Антверпен, Белгия)"->"г‑жа Hakelbracht"[label="присъдила обезщетение"];
}