mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Efter at denne ret forkastede søgsmålet, har appellanten i hovedsagen iværksat appel for Consiglio di Stato (øverste domstol i forvaltningsretlige sager, Italien).
Ifølge appellanten i hovedsagen er de lovbestemmelser om reglerne for omfordeling, som er blevet anvendt i forhold til selskabet, navnlig artikel 1, stk. 8, i lovdekret nr. 43/1999 og artikel 1, stk. 5 i lovdekret nr. 8/2000, i strid med forordning nr. 3950/92 og forordning nr. 536/93. Ved at bestemme, at tillægsafgiften skal opgøres efter en omfordeling af de uudnyttede referencemængder ud fra prioriterede kategorier, tilsidesatte den italienske lovgiver således artikel 2, stk. 1, i forordning nr. 3950/92, som foreskrev, at der, såfremt medlemsstaterne valgte at omfordele de uudnyttede referencemængder, skulle anvendes et ufravigeligt kriterium om lighed og proportionalitet.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "appellanten"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (øverste domstol i forvaltningsretlige sager, Italien))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (øverste domstol i forvaltningsretlige sager, Italien))"[label="appel"];
  "appellanten"->"artikel 1, stk. 8, i lovdekret nr. 43/1999 og artikel 1, stk. 5 i lovdekret nr. 8/2000, i strid med forordning nr. 3950/92 og forordning nr. 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: German

Nachdem ihre Klage abgewiesen worden war, legte die Klägerin des Ausgangsverfahrens ein Rechtsmittel beim Consiglio di Stato (Staatsrat, Italien) ein.
Die Klägerin des Ausgangsverfahrens vertritt die Auffassung, dass die auf sie angewandten Rechtsvorschriften über die Modalitäten der Neuverteilung, insbesondere Art. 1 Abs. 8 des Decreto-legge Nr. 43/1999 und Art. 1 Abs. 5 des Decreto-legge Nr. 8/2000 gegen die Verordnungen Nrn. 3950/92 und 536/93 verstießen. Der italienische Gesetzgeber habe nämlich dadurch, dass er die quantitative Erfassung der Zusatzabgabe nach Neuzuweisung der ungenutzten Referenzmengen nach vorrangigen Gruppen vorsehe, gegen Art. 2 Abs. 1 der Verordnung Nr. 3950/92 verstoßen, der in dem Fall, dass die Mitgliedstaaten eine Neuzuweisung der ungenutzten Referenzmengen beschlössen, eine paritätische und anteilsmäßige Verteilung vorschreibe, die nicht abbedungen werden könne.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Die Klägerin des Ausgangsverfahrens"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (Staatsrat, Italien))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (Staatsrat, Italien))"[label="Rechtsmittel"];
  "Die Klägerin des Ausgangsverfahrens"->"Art. 1 Abs. 8 des Decreto-legge Nr. 43/1999 und Art. 1 Abs. 5 des Decreto-legge Nr. 8/2000 gegen die Verordnungen Nrn. 3950/92 und 536/93 verstießen."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Kuna kaebus jäeti rahuldamata, kaebas põhikohtuasja kaebuse esitaja selle peale edasi Consiglio di Statole (Itaalia kõrgeima halduskohtuna tegutsev riiginõukogu).
Põhikohtuasja kaebuse esitaja hinnangul on ümberjaotamismeetodit käsitlevad seadusesätted, mida tema suhtes kohaldati, nimelt dekreetseaduse nr 43/1999 artikli 1 lõige 8 ja dekreetseaduse nr 8/2000 artikli 1 lõige 5, vastuolus määrusega nr 3950/92 ja määrusega nr 536/93. Kuna Itaalia seadusandja nägi nimelt ette, et täiendava tasu suurus määratakse kindlaks pärast kasutamata jäänud individuaalsete kvootide ümberjaotamist eelistatud tootjate rühmadest lähtuvalt, siis on ta rikkunud määruse nr 3950/92 artikli 2 lõiget 1, mis juhuks, kui liikmesriigid on otsustanud kasutamata kvoodid ümber jaotada, kehtestab võrdsel ja proportsionaalsel alusel kriteeriumi, millest ei tehta ühtki erandit.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Põhikohtuasja kaebuse esitaja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Statole (Itaalia kõrgeima halduskohtuna tegutsev riiginõukogu))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Statole (Itaalia kõrgeima halduskohtuna tegutsev riiginõukogu))"[label="kaebus"];
  "Põhikohtuasja kaebuse esitaja"->"dekreetseaduse nr 43/1999 artikli 1 lõige 8 ja dekreetseaduse nr 8/2000 artikli 1 lõige 5, vastuolus määrusega nr 3950/92 ja määrusega nr 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Δεδομένου ότι η προσφυγή της απορρίφθηκε, η εκκαλούσα της κύριας δίκης άσκησε έφεση ενώπιον του Consiglio di Stato (Συμβούλιου της Επικρατείας, Ιταλία).
Υποστηρίζει ότι οι νομικές διατάξεις περί των τρόπων ανακατανομής που εφαρμόστηκαν στην περίπτωσή της, μεταξύ άλλων, το άρθρο 1, παράγραφος 8, του νομοθετικού διατάγματος 43/1999 και το άρθρο 1, παράγραφος 5, του νομοθετικού διατάγματος 8/2000, προσκρούουν στους κανονισμούς 3950/92 και 536/93. Συγκεκριμένα, προβλέποντας ότι η συμπληρωματική εισφορά καθορίζεται ποσοτικώς μετά την ανακατανομή των μη χρησιμοποιηθεισών ποσοτήτων αναφοράς με βάση κατηγορίες προτεραιότητας, ο Ιταλός νομοθέτης παρέβη το άρθρο 2, παράγραφος 1, του κανονισμού 3950/92, το οποίο, σε περίπτωση που τα κράτη μέλη επιλέξουν να ανακατανείμουν τις μη χρησιμοποιηθείσες ποσότητες αναφοράς, επιβάλλει ισότιμο και αναλογικό κριτήριο χωρίς καμία εξαίρεση.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "η εκκαλούσα"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Συμβούλιου της Επικρατείας, Ιταλία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Συμβούλιου της Επικρατείας, Ιταλία)"[label="έφεση"];
  "η εκκαλούσα"->"το άρθρο 1, παράγραφος 8, του νομοθετικού διατάγματος 43/1999 και το άρθρο 1, παράγραφος 5, του νομοθετικού διατάγματος 8/2000, προσκρούουν στους κανονισμούς 3950/92 και 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: French

Son recours ayant été rejeté, la requérante au principal a interjeté appel devant le Consiglio di Stato (Conseil d’État, Italie).
La requérante au principal estime que les dispositions légales prévoyant les modalités de redistribution qui lui ont été appliquées, notamment l’article 1er, paragraphe 8, du décret-loi no 43/1999 et l’article 1er, paragraphe 5, du décret-loi no 8/2000, sont contraires aux règlements nos 3950/92 et 536/93. En effet, en prévoyant que le prélèvement supplémentaire est quantifié après réallocation des quantités de référence inutilisées selon des catégories prioritaires, le législateur italien aurait violé l’article 2, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 3950/92 qui imposerait, dans le cas où les États membres choisissent de réallouer les quantités de référence inutilisées, un critère paritaire et proportionnel ne souffrant aucune dérogation.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "La requérante au principal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Conseil d’État, Italie)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Conseil d’État, Italie)"[label="interjeté appel"];
  "La requérante au principal"->"l’article 1er, paragraphe 8, du décret-loi no 43/1999 et l’article 1er, paragraphe 5, du décret-loi no 8/2000, sont contraires aux règlements nos 3950/92 et 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Nakon što je njegova tužba odbijena, tužitelj u glavnom postupku podnio je žalbu Consigliu di Stato (Državno vijeće, Italija).
Tužitelj u glavnom postupku smatra da su zakonske odredbe kojima se predviđaju modaliteti ponovne raspodjele koji su na njega bili primijenjeni, osobito članak 1. stavak 8. Uredbe sa zakonskom snagom br. 43/1999 i članak 1. stavak 5. Uredbe sa zakonskom snagom br. 8/2000, protivne Uredbama br. 3950/92 i 536/93. Naime, talijanski zakonodavac je propisivanjem da se dodatna pristojba utvrđuje nakon ponovne raspodjele neiskorištenih referentnih količina po prioritetnim kategorijama prekršio članak 2. stavak 1. Uredbe br. 3950/92, kojim se, u slučaju kada države članice odluče ponovno raspodijeliti neiskorištene referentne količine, propisuje mjerilo jednakosti i razmjernosti od kojeg nije moguće odstupiti.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tužitelj"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Državno vijeće, Italija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Državno vijeće, Italija)"[label="žalbu"];
  "Tužitelj"->"članak 1. stavak 8. Uredbe sa zakonskom snagom br. 43/1999 i članak 1. stavak 5. Uredbe sa zakonskom snagom br. 8/2000, protivne Uredbama br. 3950/92 i 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

A seguito del rigetto del ricorso da essa proposto, la ricorrente di cui al procedimento principale ha interposto appello dinanzi al Consiglio di Stato (Italia).
La ricorrente di cui al procedimento principale ritiene che le disposizioni di legge che prevedono le modalità di ridistribuzione che le sono state applicate, e segnatamente l’articolo 1, comma 8, del decreto‑legge n. 43/1999 e l’articolo 1, comma 5, del decreto‑legge n. 8/2000, siano contrarie ai regolamenti n. 3950/92 e n. 536/93. Infatti, prevedendo che il prelievo supplementare venga quantificato dopo la riassegnazione dei quantitativi di riferimento inutilizzati eseguita per categorie prioritarie, il legislatore italiano avrebbe violato l’articolo 2, paragrafo 1, del regolamento n. 3950/92, il quale imporrebbe, per il caso in cui gli Stati membri scelgano di riassegnare i quantitativi di riferimento inutilizzati, di applicare un criterio paritario e proporzionale non suscettibile di alcuna deroga.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "La ricorrente"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (Italia))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (Italia))"[label="appello"];
  "La ricorrente"->"l’articolo 1, comma 8, del decreto‑legge n. 43/1999 e l’articolo 1, comma 5, del decreto‑legge n. 8/2000, siano contrarie ai regolamenti n. 3950/92 e n. 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Tā kā prasītājas pamatlietā prasība tika noraidīta, tā iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību Consiglio di Stato (Valsts padome, Itālija).
Prasītāja pamatlietā uzskata, ka tiesību normas, ar kurām ir paredzēta pārdales kārtība, kas tai ir tikusi piemērota, it īpaši Dekrētlikuma Nr. 43/1999 1. panta 8. punkts un Dekrētlikuma Nr. 8/2000 1. panta 5. punkts, neatbilst Regulām Nr. 3950/92 un Nr. 536/93. Itālijas likumdevējs, paredzot, ka papildmaksājums tiek aprēķināts pēc neizmantoto references daudzumu pārdalījuma atbilstoši prioritārajām kategorijām, esot pārkāpis Regulas Nr. 3950/92 2. panta 1. punktu, kurā esot noteikts, ka gadījumā, ja dalībvalstis izvēlas pārdalīt neizmantotos references daudzumus, nenotiek nekāda atkāpšanās no vienlīdzīgas un samērīguma kritērija.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Prasītāja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Valsts padome, Itālija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Valsts padome, Itālija)"[label="Apelācijas sūdzību"];
  "Prasītāja"->"Dekrētlikuma Nr. 43/1999 1. panta 8. punkts un Dekrētlikuma Nr. 8/2000 1. panta 5. punkts, neatbilst Regulām Nr. 3950/92 un Nr. 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Kadangi jos skundas buvo atmestas, pareiškėja pagrindinėje byloje pateikė apeliacinį skundą Consiglio di Stato (Valstybės Taryba, Italija).
Pareiškėja pagrindinėje byloje mano, kad teisinės nuostatos, numatančios perskirstymo tvarką, kuri jam buvo taikoma, būtent Įstatyminio dekreto Nr. 43/1999 1 straipsnio 8 dalis ir Dekreto įstatymo Nr. 8/2000 1 straipsnio 5 dalis, prieštarauja reglamentams Nr. 3950/92 ir Nr. 536/93. Iš tiesų Italijos teisės akte numatant, kad papildomas mokestis apskaičiuojamas po nepanaudoto nacionalinio referencinio kiekio perskaičiavimo atsižvelgiant į pirmenybines kategorijas, juo buvo pažeista Reglamento Nr. 3950/92 2 straipsnio 1 dalis, įpareigojanti tais atvejais, kai valstybės narės nusprendžia perskirstyti nepanaudotus referencinius kiekius, vadovautis kriterijumi, pagal kurį negalima nukrypti nuo vienodo požiūrio ir proporcingumo principų.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Pareiškėja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Valstybės Taryba, Italija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Valstybės Taryba, Italija)"[label="apeliacinį skundą"];
  "Pareiškėja"->"Įstatyminio dekreto Nr. 43/1999 1 straipsnio 8 dalis ir Dekreto įstatymo Nr. 8/2000 1 straipsnio 5 dalis, prieštarauja reglamentams Nr. 3950/92 ir Nr. 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Mivel a bíróság elutasította a keresetét, az alapeljárás felperese fellebbezést nyújtott be a Consiglio di Statohoz (államtanács, Olaszország).
Az alapeljárás felperese úgy véli, hogy az újrakiosztás az esetében alkalmazott módját előíró jogszabályi rendelkezések, és különösen a 43/1999. sz. rendkívüli törvényerejű rendelet 1. cikkének (8) bekezdése és a 8/2000. sz. rendkívüli törvényerejű rendelet 1. cikkének (5) bekezdése ellentétesek a 3950/92 rendelettel és az 536/93 rendelettel. Ugyanis annak előírásával, hogy a kiegészítő illeték számszerűsítésére a fel nem használt referenciamennyiségek elsőbbségi kategóriák szerinti újrafelosztását követően kerül sor, az olasz jogalkotó megsértette a 3950/92 rendelet 2. cikkének (1) bekezdését, amely amennyiben a tagállamok a fel nem használt referenciamennyiségek újrakiosztása mellett döntenek, olyan egyenlő és arányos kritériumot állapít meg, amelytől nem lehet eltérni.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Az alapeljárás felperese"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Statohoz (államtanács, Olaszország))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Statohoz (államtanács, Olaszország))"[label="fellebbezést"];
  "Az alapeljárás felperese"->"A 43/1999. sz. rendkívüli törvényerejű rendelet 1. cikkének (8) bekezdése és a 8/2000. sz. rendkívüli törvényerejű rendelet 1. cikkének (5) bekezdése ellentétesek a 3950/92 rendelettel és az 536/93 rendelettel."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Peress li r-rikors tagħha ġie miċħud, ir-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali appellat quddiem il-Consiglio di Stato (il-Kunsill tal-Istat, l-Italja).
Ir-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali tqis li d-dispożizzjonijiet legali li jipprevedu l-modalitajiet ta’ distribuzzjoni mill-ġdid li ġew applikati għaliha, b’mod partikolari l-Artikolu 1(8) tad-Digriet Leġiżlattiv Nru 43/1999 u l-Artikolu 1(5) tad-Digriet Leġiżlattiv Nru 8/2000, huma kuntrarji għar-Regolamenti Nri 3950/92 u 536/93. Fil-fatt, billi ppreveda li l-imposta addizzjonali hija kkwantifikata wara allokazzjoni mill-ġdid tal-kwantitajiet ta’ referenza mhux użati skont kategoriji prijoritarji, il-leġiżlatur Taljan kiser l-Artikolu 2(1) tar-Regolament Nru 3950/92 li jimponi, fil-każ li l-Istati Membri jagħżlu li jallokaw mill-ġdid il-kwantitajiet ta’ referenza mhux użati, kriterju ta’ parità u proporzjonat li ma jista’ jkun suġġett għal ebda deroga.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "ir-rikorrenti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (il-Kunsill tal-Istat, l-Italja))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (il-Kunsill tal-Istat, l-Italja))"[label="appellat"];
  "ir-rikorrenti"->"l-Artikolu 1(8) tad-Digriet Leġiżlattiv Nru 43/1999 u l-Artikolu 1(5) tad-Digriet Leġiżlattiv Nru 8/2000, huma kuntrarji għar-Regolamenti Nri 3950/92 u 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Nadat haar beroep is verworpen, heeft verzoekster in het hoofdgeding hoger beroep ingesteld bij de Consiglio di Stato (hoogste bestuursrechter, Italië).
Volgens verzoekster in het hoofdgeding zijn de op haar toegepaste wettelijke bepalingen betreffende de herverdeling – met name artikel 1, lid 8, van voorlopig wetsbesluit nr. 43/1999 en artikel 1, lid 5, van voorlopig wetsbesluit nr. 8/2000 – in strijd met de verordeningen nr. 3950/92 en nr. 536/93. Door te bepalen dat de hoogte van de extra heffing wordt vastgesteld nadat de ongebruikte referentiehoeveelheden worden herverdeeld volgens prioritaire categorieën, heeft de Italiaanse wetgever immers artikel 2, lid 1, van verordening nr. 3950/92 geschonden. Volgens laatstgenoemde bepaling moeten lidstaten die ervoor kiezen om ongebruikte referentiehoeveelheden te herverdelen, een criterium van gelijkheid en evenredigheid hanteren waarvan niet kan worden afgeweken.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "verzoekster"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato, Italië)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato, Italië)"[label="hoger beroep"];
  "verzoekster"->"Artikel 1, lid 8, van voorlopig wetsbesluit nr. 43/1999 en artikel 1, lid 5, van voorlopig wetsbesluit nr. 8/2000 – in strijd met de verordeningen nr. 3950/92 en nr. 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W związku z tym, że jej skarga została oddalona, skarżąca w postępowaniu głównym wniosła odwołanie do Consiglio di Stato (rady stanu, Włochy).
Skarżąca w postępowaniu głównym uważa, że przepisy prawa przewidujące zasady redystrybucji, które zostały wobec niej zastosowane, w szczególności art. 1 ust. 8 dekretu z mocą ustawy nr 43/1999 i art. 1 ust. 5 dekretu z mocą ustawy nr 8/2000 są niezgodne z rozporządzeniami nr 3950/92 i nr 536/93. Jej zdaniem włoski ustawodawca, przewidując, że dodatkowa opłata wyrównawcza zostanie określona ilościowo po ponownym przydzieleniu niewykorzystanych ilości referencyjnych według kategorii priorytetowych, naruszył art. 2 ust. 1 rozporządzenia nr 3950/92, który w przypadku gdy państwa członkowskie zdecydują się na ponowne przydzielenie niewykorzystanych ilości referencyjnych, ustanawia parytetowe i proporcjonalne kryterium niepodlegające żadnemu odstępstwu

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Skarżąca"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (rady stanu, Włochy))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (rady stanu, Włochy))"[label="odwołanie"];
  "Skarżąca"->"art. 1 ust. 8 dekretu z mocą ustawy nr 43/1999 i art. 1 ust. 5 dekretu z mocą ustawy nr 8/2000 są niezgodne z rozporządzeniami nr 3950/92 i nr 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Tendo sido negado provimento ao seu recurso, a recorrente no processo principal recorreu para o Consiglio di Stato (Conselho de Estado, em formação jurisdicional, Itália).
A recorrente no processo principal considera que as disposições legais que preveem as modalidades de redistribuição que lhe foram aplicadas, designadamente o artigo 1.o, n.o 8, do Decreto‑Lei n.o 43/1999 e o artigo 1.o, n.o 5, do Decreto‑Lei n.o 8/2000, são contrárias aos Regulamentos n.os 3950/92 e 536/93. Com efeito, ao prever que a imposição suplementar é quantificada após a reatribuição das quantidades de referência não utilizadas segundo categorias prioritárias, o legislador italiano violou o artigo 2.o, n.o 1, do Regulamento n.o 3950/92 que impunha, no caso de os Estados‑Membros escolherem reatribuir as quantidades de referência não utilizadas, um critério paritário e proporcional que não admite nenhuma derrogação.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "A recorrente no processo principal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Conselho de Estado, Itália)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Conselho de Estado, Itália)"[label="recurso"];
  "A recorrente no processo principal"->"o artigo 1.o, n.o 8, do Decreto‑Lei n.o 43/1999 e o artigo 1.o, n.o 5, do Decreto‑Lei n.o 8/2000, são contrárias aos Regulamentos n.os 3950/92 e 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Întrucât acțiunea sa a fost respinsă, reclamanta din litigiul principal a declarat apel la Consiglio di Stato (Consiliul de Stat, Italia).
Reclamanta din litigiul principal consideră că dispozițiile legale care prevăd modalitățile de redistribuire care i‑au fost aplicate, în special articolul 1 alineatul 8 din Decretul‑lege nr. 43/1999 și articolul 1 alineatul 5 din Decretul‑lege nr. 8/2000, sunt contrare Regulamentelor nr. 3950/92 și nr. 536/93. Astfel, prin prevederea că prelevarea suplimentară este cuantificată ulterior realocării cantităților de referință neutilizate conform categoriilor prioritare, legiuitorul italian ar fi încălcat articolul 2 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul nr. 3950/92 care ar impune, în cazul în care statele membre aleg să realoce cantitățile de referință neutilizate, un criteriu paritar și proporțional care nu suferă nicio derogare.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Reclamanta din litigiul principal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiliul de Stat, Italia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiliul de Stat, Italia)"[label="apel"];
  "Reclamanta din litigiul principal"->"articolul 1 alineatul 8 din Decretul‑lege nr. 43/1999 și articolul 1 alineatul 5 din Decretul‑lege nr. 8/2000, sunt contrare Regulamentelor nr. 3950/92 și nr. 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Keďže jej žaloba bola zamietnutá, odvolateľka vo veci samej sa odvolala na Consiglio di Stato (Štátna rada, Taliansko).
Odvolateľka vo veci samej sa domnieva, že zákonné ustanovenia upravujúce pravidlá prerozdeľovania, ktoré sa voči nej uplatnili, najmä článok 1 ods. 8 zákonného dekrétu č. 43/1999 a článok 1 ods. 5 zákonného dekrétu č. 8/2000, sú v rozpore s nariadeniami č. 3950/92 a 536/93. Taliansky zákonodarca totiž tým, že stanovil, že dodatočný poplatok sa vyčísli po vykonaní opätovného pridelenia nevyužitých referenčných množstiev na základe prioritných kategórií, porušil článok 2 ods. 1 nariadenia č. 3950/92, ktorý v prípade, že sa členské štáty rozhodnú opätovne prideliť nevyužité referenčné množstvá, stanovuje kritérium založené na rovnosti a pomernosti, od ktorého sa nemožno odchýliť.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Odvolateľka"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Štátna rada, Taliansko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Štátna rada, Taliansko)"[label="odvolala"];
  "Odvolateľka"->"článok 1 ods. 8 zákonného dekrétu č. 43/1999 a článok 1 ods. 5 zákonného dekrétu č. 8/2000, sú v rozpore s nariadeniami č. 3950/92 a 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Ker je bila njena tožba zavrnjena, je tožeča stranka v postopku v glavni stvari vložila pritožbo pri Consiglio di Stato (državni svet, Italija).
Tožeča stranka v postopku v glavni stvari meni, da so zakonske določbe, ki urejajo postopke prerazporeditve, ki so bile uporabljene zanjo, zlasti člen 1(8) uredbe-zakona št. 43/1999 in člen 1(5) uredbe-zakona št. 8/2000, v nasprotju z uredbama št. 3950/92 in 536/93. Italijanski zakonodajalec naj bi namreč s tem, da je določil, da se dodatna dajatev določi po prerazporeditvi neuporabljenih referenčnih količin po prednostnih kategorijah, kršil člen 2(1) Uredbe št. 3950/92, ki naj bi v primerih, kadar se države članice odločijo prerazporediti neuporabljene referenčne količine, določal merilo enakosti in sorazmernosti, od katerih ni mogoče odstopati.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tožeča stranka"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (državni svet, Italija))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (državni svet, Italija))"[label="pritožbo"];
  "Tožeča stranka"->"Člen 1(8) uredbe-zakona št. 43/1999 in člen 1(5) uredbe-zakona št. 8/2000, v nasprotju z uredbama št. 3950/92 in 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Pääasian kantajan kanne hylättiin, ja se haki ratkaisuun muutosta Consiglio di Statolta (ylin hallintotuomioistuin, Italia).
Pääasian kantaja katsoo, että siihen sovelletut säännökset, joissa annetaan uudelleenjakoa koskevat yksityiskohtaiset säännöt, eli asetuksen nro 43/1999 1 §:n 8 momentti ja asetuksen nro 8/2000 1 §:n 5 momentti ovat asetuksen N:o 3950/92 ja N:o 536/93 vastaisia. Italian lainsäätäjä on nimittäin säätäessään käyttämättömien viitemäärien uudelleenjakamisen jälkeen suoritettavasta lisämaksun määrän määrittämisestä luokkakohtaisten etuoikeuksien mukaan rikkonut asetuksen N:o 3950/92 2 artiklan 1 kohtaa, jossa jäsenvaltiot velvoitetaan soveltamaan siinä tapauksessa, että ne ovat valinneet käyttämättömien viitemäärien uudelleenjakamisen, tasapuolista ja suhteellista jakamisperustetta, josta ei saada poiketa.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Pääasian kantaja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Statolta (ylin hallintotuomioistuin, Italia))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Statolta (ylin hallintotuomioistuin, Italia))"[label="muutosta"];
  "Pääasian kantaja"->"asetuksen nro 43/1999 1 §:n 8 momentti ja asetuksen nro 8/2000 1 §:n 5 momentti ovat asetuksen N:o 3950/92 ja N:o 536/93 vastaisia."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Nämnda domstol ogillade det överklagandet. Klaganden i det nationella målet överklagade därför till Consiglio di Stato (Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Italien).
Klaganden i det nationella målet anser att de lagbestämmelser som fastställer de omfördelningsregler som har tillämpats på klaganden, bland annat artikel 1.8 i lagdekret nr 43/1999 och artikel 1.5 i lagdekret nr 8/2000, strider mot förordning nr 3950/92 och förordning nr 536/93. Den italienska lagstiftaren har nämligen genom att föreskriva att tilläggsavgiften ska fastställas efter omfördelning av de outnyttjade referenskvantiteterna enligt de prioriterade kategorierna åsidosatt artikel 2.1 i förordning nr 3950/92, i vilken det – i de fall då medlemsstaterna väljer att omfördela outnyttjade referenskvantiteter – föreskrivs ett undantagslöst likhets- och proportionalitetskriterium.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Klaganden"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Italien))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Italien))"[label="överklagandet, överklagade"];
  "Klaganden"->"artikel 1.8 i lagdekret nr 43/1999 och artikel 1.5 i lagdekret nr 8/2000, strider mot förordning nr 3950/92 och förordning nr 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

Съдилищата на Обединеното кралство са издали две европейски заповеди за арест по отношение на RO, отправени към Ирландия.
Първата, издадена на 27 януари 2016 г., се отнася за убийство и палеж, за които се посочва, че са извършени на 2 август 2015 г. Втората, издадена на 4 май 2016 г., се отнася за изнасилване, за което се посочва, че е извършено на 30 декември 2003 г. За всяко от тези деяния се предвижда наказание доживотен затвор.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Съдилищата на Обединеното кралство"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "две европейски заповеди за арест"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Съдилищата на Обединеното кралство"->"две европейски заповеди за арест"[label="Issue"];
  "две европейски заповеди за арест"->"издадена 27/01/2016 се отнася за убийство и палеж"[dir=none];
  "две европейски заповеди за арест"->"издадена 04/05/2016 се отнася за изнасилване"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Las autoridades judiciales del Reino Unido emitieron dos órdenes de detención europeas dirigidas a Irlanda para la entrega de RO.
La primera, fechada el 27 de enero de 2016, se refiere a un asesinato y a un incendio intencionado supuestamente cometidos el 2 de agosto de 2015. La segunda, emitida el 4 de mayo de 2016, guarda relación con una violación supuestamente cometida el 30 de diciembre de 2003. Cada uno de estos comportamientos puede ser castigado con cadena perpetua.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Las autoridades judiciales del Reino Unido"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dos órdenes de detención europeas"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Las autoridades judiciales del Reino Unido"->"dos órdenes de detención europeas"[label="Issue"];
  "dos órdenes de detención europeas"->"emitieron 27/01/2016 se refiere a un asesinato y a un incendio intencionado"[dir=none];
  "dos órdenes de detención europeas"->"emitieron 04/05/2016 se refiere a la violación"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

Soudy Spojeného království vydaly na RO dva evropské zatýkací rozkazy adresované Irsku.
První evropský zatýkací rozkaz, vydaný dne 27. ledna 2016, se týká trestných činů vraždy a žhářství, jež byly údajně spáchány dne 2. srpna 2015. Druhý evropský zatýkací rozkaz, vydaný dne 4. května 2016, se týká trestného činu znásilnění, který byl údajně spáchán dne 30. prosince 2003. Za každý z těchto trestných činů lze uložit trest odnětí svobody na doživotí.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Soudy Spojeného království"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dva evropské zatýkací rozkazy"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Soudy Spojeného království"->"dva evropské zatýkací rozkazy"[label="Issue"];
  "dva evropské zatýkací rozkazy"->"vydaný 27/01/2016 se týká trestných činů vraždy a žhářství"[dir=none];
  "dva evropské zatýkací rozkazy"->"vydaný 04/05/2016 se týká trestného činu znásilnění"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

RO er genstand for to europæiske arrestordrer, som retterne i Det Forenede Kongerige har udstedt til Irland.
Den første, som blev udstedt den 27. januar 2016, vedrører et mord og forsætlig brandstiftelse, der angiveligt blev begået den 2. august 2015. Den anden, som blev udstedt den 4. maj 2016, vedrører en voldtægt, der angiveligt blev begået den 30. december 2003. Begge disse lovovertrædelser kan straffes med fængsel på livstid.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "retterne i Det Forenede Kongerige"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "to europæiske arrestordrer"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "retterne i Det Forenede Kongerige"->"to europæiske arrestordrer"[label="Issue"];
  "to europæiske arrestordrer"->"udstedt 27/01/2016 vedrører et mord og forsætlig brandstiftelse"[dir=none];
  "to europæiske arrestordrer"->"udstedt 04/05/2016 vedrører en voldtægt"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

Die Gerichte des Vereinigten Königreichs erließen zwei Europäische Haftbefehle gegen RO und übersandten diese an Irland.
Der erste Europäische Haftbefehl, der am 27. Januar 2016 ausgestellt wurde, erging wegen Totschlags und Brandstiftung, die mutmaßlich am 2. August 2015 verübt wurden. Der zweite, am 4. Mai 2016 ausgestellte Europäische Haftbefehl erging wegen Vergewaltigung, die mutmaßlich am 30. Dezember 2003 begangen wurde. Jede dieser Taten ist mit lebenslanger Freiheitsstrafe bedroht.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Die Gerichte des Vereinigten Königreichs"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "zwei Europäische Haftbefehle"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Die Gerichte des Vereinigten Königreichs"->"zwei Europäische Haftbefehle"[label="Issue"];
  "zwei Europäische Haftbefehle"->"ausgestellt 27/01/2016 steht im Zusammenhang mit Mord und Brandstiftung"[dir=none];
  "zwei Europäische Haftbefehle"->"ausgestellt 04/05/2016 bezieht sich auf Vergewaltigung"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Ühendkuningriigi kohtud tegid RO suhtes kaks Euroopa vahistamismäärust, mille nad edastasid Iirimaale.
Esimene määrus, mis tehti 27. jaanuaril 2016, puudutab mõrva ja süütamist, mis väidetavalt pandi toime 2. augustil 2015. Teine määrus, mis anti välja 4. mail 2016, puudutab vägistamist, mis väidetavalt pandi toime 30. detsembril 2003. Iga nimetatud kuriteo eest võib mõista eluaegse vangistuse.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Ühendkuningriigi kohtud"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RO suhtes kaks Euroopa vahistamismäärust"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Ühendkuningriigi kohtud"->"RO suhtes kaks Euroopa vahistamismäärust"[label="Issue"];
  "RO suhtes kaks Euroopa vahistamismäärust"->"anti välja 27/01/2016 puudutab mõrva ja süütamist"[dir=none];
  "RO suhtes kaks Euroopa vahistamismäärust"->"anti välja 04/05/2016 puudutab vägistamist"[dir=none];
}