mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Tanto la Sra. Hakelbracht como la Sra. Vandenbon intimaron a WTG Retail, mediante escrito de 10 de octubre de 2016, a abonarles una indemnización a tanto alzado correspondiente a seis meses de salario. Al no alcanzar un acuerdo sobre este punto, solicitaron al arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de lo Laboral de Amberes, Bélgica) que condenara a dicha empresa al pago de esa indemnización.
Como se desprende de la resolución de remisión, en el asunto principal ha quedado acreditado que la Sra. Hakelbracht fue efectivamente víctima de una discriminación directa por razón de sexo, por lo cual el órgano jurisdiccional remitente le concedió una indemnización por tal motivo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sra. Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sra. Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de lo Laboral de Amberes, Bélgica)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Sra. Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="escrito de 10 de octubre de 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "Sra. Vandenbon"->"escrito de 10 de octubre de 2016 10/10/2016";
  "escrito de 10 de octubre de 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "escrito de 10 de octubre de 2016 10/10/2016"->"abonarles una indemnización a tanto alzado correspondiente a seis meses de salario."[dir=none];
  "Sra. Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de lo Laboral de Amberes, Bélgica)"[label="solicitaron al arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de lo Laboral de Amberes, Bélgica) que condenara a dicha empresa al pago de esa indemnización.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de lo Laboral de Amberes, Bélgica)"->"Sra. Hakelbracht"[label="le concedió una indemnización"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Jak J. Hakelbracht, tak i T. Vandenbon vyzvaly dopisem ze dne 10. října 2016 společnost WTG Retail, aby každé z nich zaplatila paušální částku odpovídající šestiměsíční mzdě. Vzhledem k tomu, že v tomto ohledu nedospěly k dohodě, obrátily se na arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (pracovní soud v Antverpách, Belgie), u něhož se domáhaly, aby této společnosti uložil povinnost zaplatit tuto náhradu.
Jak vyplývá z předkládacího rozhodnutí, ve věci v původním řízení je nesporné, že J. Hakelbracht se skutečně stala obětí přímé diskriminace na základě pohlaví, což je důvod, proč jí předkládající soud přiznal z tohoto titulu náhradu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (pracovní soud v Antverpách, Belgie)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="dopisem ze dne 10. října 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"dopisem ze dne 10. října 2016 10/10/2016";
  "dopisem ze dne 10. října 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "dopisem ze dne 10. října 2016 10/10/2016"->"každé z nich zaplatila paušální částku odpovídající šestiměsíční mzdě."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (pracovní soud v Antverpách, Belgie)"[label="Domáhaly, aby této společnosti uložil povinnost zaplatit tuto náhradu.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (pracovní soud v Antverpách, Belgie)"->"J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[label="přiznal z tohoto titulu náhradu."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Både Jamina Hakelbracht og Tine Vandenbon opfordrede ved skrivelse af 10. oktober 2016 WTG Retail til at betale dem hver en fast godtgørelse på et beløb svarende til seks måneders løn. Da der ikke kunne opnås enighed på dette punkt, anlagde de sag ved arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbejdsretten i første instans i Antwerpen, Belgien) med påstand om, at denne virksomhed blev pålagt at betale denne erstatning.
Som det fremgår af forelæggelsesafgørelsen, er der i hovedsagen enighed om, at Jamina Hakelbracht faktisk var offer for en direkte forskelsbehandling på grund af køn, hvorfor den forelæggende ret har tilkendt hende en erstatning herfor.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht og Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht og Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbejdsretten i første instans i Antwerpen, Belgien))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Jamina Hakelbracht og Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="skrivelse af 10. oktober 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht og Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"skrivelse af 10. oktober 2016 10/10/2016";
  "skrivelse af 10. oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "skrivelse af 10. oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"betale dem hver en fast godtgørelse på et beløb svarende til seks måneders løn."[dir=none];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht og Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbejdsretten i første instans i Antwerpen, Belgien))"[label="med påstand om, at denne virksomhed blev pålagt at betale denne erstatning.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbejdsretten i første instans i Antwerpen, Belgien))"->"Jamina Hakelbracht og Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[label="tilkendt hende en erstatning"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: German

Frau Hakelbracht und Frau Vandenbon forderten WTG Retail mit Schreiben vom 10. Oktober 2016 auf, ihnen jeweils einen Pauschalbetrag in Höhe von sechs Monaten Lohn als Entschädigung zu zahlen. Mangels Einigung erhoben sie bei der Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Arbeitsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien) gegen dieses Unternehmen eine Klage auf Zahlung dieser Entschädigung.
Wie aus der Vorlageentscheidung hervorgeht, steht im Ausgangsverfahren fest, dass Frau Hakelbracht tatsächlich unmittelbar aufgrund ihres Geschlechts diskriminiert worden ist, weshalb das vorlegende Gericht ihr Schadensersatz zugesprochen hat.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Frau Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Frau Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Arbeitsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Frau Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="Schreiben vom 10. Oktober 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "Frau Vandenbon"->"Schreiben vom 10. Oktober 2016 10/10/2016";
  "Schreiben vom 10. Oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "Schreiben vom 10. Oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"ihnen jeweils einen Pauschalbetrag in Höhe von sechs Monaten Lohn als Entschädigung zu zahlen."[dir=none];
  "Frau Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Arbeitsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien)"[label="forderten WTG Retail mit Schreiben vom 10. Oktober 2016 auf, ihnen jeweils einen Pauschalbetrag in Höhe von sechs Monaten Lohn als Entschädigung zu zahlen.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Arbeitsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien)"->"Frau Hakelbracht"[label="Schadensersatz zugesprochen hat."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Nii J. Hakelbracht kui ka T. Vandenbon esitasid WTG Retailile 10. oktoobri 2016. aasta kirjaga võlanõude, milles kumbki nõudis, et talle makstaks kuue kuu töötasu suurune kindlasummaline hüvitis. Kuna selles osas kokkuleppele ei jõutud, esitasid nad arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpenile (Antwerpeni töökohus, Belgia) nõude sellelt ettevõtjalt mainitud hüvitise väljamõistmiseks.
Eelotsusetaotlusest nähtub, et põhikohtuasjas on selge, et J. Hakelbrachti diskrimineeriti tõepoolest otseselt soo alusel, mistõttu eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus mõistis talle selle eest välja hüvitise.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpeni töökohus, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="10. oktoobri 2016. aasta kirjaga 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"10. oktoobri 2016. aasta kirjaga 10/10/2016";
  "10. oktoobri 2016. aasta kirjaga 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "10. oktoobri 2016. aasta kirjaga 10/10/2016"->"et talle makstaks kuue kuu töötasu suurune kindlasummaline hüvitis."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpeni töökohus, Belgia)"[label="nõude sellelt ettevõtjalt mainitud hüvitise väljamõistmiseks.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpeni töökohus, Belgia)"->"J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[label="mõistis talle selle eest välja hüvitise."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Τόσο η J. Hakelbracht όσο και η Τ. Vandenbon όχλησαν τη WTG Retail, με έγγραφο της 10ης Οκτωβρίου 2016, ζητώντας να καταβληθεί σε καθεμία εξ αυτών κατ’ αποκοπήν αποζημίωση ποσού αντιστοιχούντος σε μισθούς έξι μηνών. Δεδομένου ότι δεν κατόρθωσαν να επιτύχουν συμφωνία επί του θέματος αυτού, ζήτησαν από το arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (πρωτοβάθμιο δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο) να υποχρεώσει την εν λόγω επιχείρηση να καταβάλει την αποζημίωση αυτήν.
Όπως προκύπτει από την απόφαση περί παραπομπής, δεν αμφισβητείται στην υπόθεση της κύριας δίκης ότι η J. Hakelbracht υπέστη πράγματι άμεση διάκριση λόγω φύλου και, για τον λόγο αυτόν, το αιτούν δικαστήριο της επιδίκασε τη σχετική αποζημίωση.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "κύριας Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "κύριας Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (πρωτοβάθμιο δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "κύριας Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="έγγραφο 10/10/2016"];
  "κύριας Vandenbon"->"έγγραφο 10/10/2016";
  "έγγραφο 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "έγγραφο 10/10/2016"->"να καταβληθεί σε καθεμία εξ αυτών κατ’ αποκοπήν αποζημίωση ποσού αντιστοιχούντος σε μισθούς έξι μηνών"[dir=none];
  "κύριας Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (πρωτοβάθμιο δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο)"[label="ζήτησαν από το arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (πρωτοβάθμιο δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο) να υποχρεώσει την εν λόγω επιχείρηση να καταβάλει την αποζημίωση αυτήν."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (πρωτοβάθμιο δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο)"->"κύριας Hakelbracht"[label="επιδίκασε τη σχετική αποζημίωση"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: French

Tant Mme Hakelbracht que Mme Vandenbon ont mis en demeure WTG Retail, par lettre du 10 octobre 2016, de leur verser à chacune une indemnité forfaitaire d’un montant correspondant à six mois de salaire. À défaut d’avoir pu conclure un accord sur ce point, elles ont demandé à l’arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal du travail d’Anvers, Belgique) de condamner cette entreprise au paiement de cette indemnité.
Ainsi qu’il ressort de la décision de renvoi, il est constant dans l’affaire au principal que Mme Hakelbracht a effectivement été victime d’une discrimination directe fondée sur le sexe, raison pour laquelle la juridiction de renvoi lui a accordé une indemnisation à ce titre.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Mme Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Mme Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal du travail d'Anvers, Belgique)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Mme Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="lettre du 10 octobre 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "Mme Vandenbon"->"lettre du 10 octobre 2016 10/10/2016";
  "lettre du 10 octobre 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "lettre du 10 octobre 2016 10/10/2016"->"leur verser à chacune une indemnité forfaitaire d’un montant correspondant à six mois de salaire."[dir=none];
  "Mme Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal du travail d'Anvers, Belgique)"[label="elles ont demandé à l’arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal du travail d’Anvers, Belgique) de condamner cette entreprise au paiement de cette indemnité.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal du travail d'Anvers, Belgique)"->"Mme Hakelbracht"[label="a accordé une indemnisation"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

J. Hakelbracht i T. Vandenbon pismom opomene od 10. listopada 2016. zatražile su od društva WTG Retail da svakoj pojedinačno isplati paušalnu naknadu štete u iznosu od šest mjesečnih plaća. Budući da u tom smislu nije mogao biti postignut sporazum, one su zatražile od arbeidsrechtbanka Antwerpen (Radni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija) da tom poduzeću naloži plaćanje te naknade štete.
Kao što to proizlazi iz odluke kojom se upućuje zahtjev, u glavnom je postupku nesporno da je J. Hakelbracht zaista bila žrtva izravne diskriminacije na temelju spola zbog čega joj je sud koji je uputio zahtjev s te osnove odobrio naknadu štete.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Radni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="pismom opomene 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"pismom opomene 10/10/2016";
  "pismom opomene 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "pismom opomene 10/10/2016"->"svakoj pojedinačno isplati paušalnu naknadu štete u iznosu od šest mjesečnih plaća."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Radni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija)"[label="da tom poduzeću naloži plaćanje te naknade štete.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Radni sud u Antwerpenu, Belgija)"->"J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[label="odobrio naknadu štete."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Sia la sig.ra Hakelbracht che la sig.ra Vandenbon hanno ingiunto alla WTG Retail, con lettera di diffida del 10 ottobre 2016, di pagare a ciascuna un’indennità di licenziamento forfettaria di importo pari a sei mesi di stipendio. Non essendo riuscite a giungere a un accordo su tale punto, esse hanno chiesto all’arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale del lavoro di Anversa, Belgio) di condannare tale impresa al pagamento di detta indennità.
Come risulta dalla decisione di rinvio, è pacifico procedimento principale che la sig.ra Hakelbracht è stata effettivamente vittima di una discriminazione diretta fondata sul sesso, ragion per cui il giudice del rinvio le ha concesso un risarcimento a tale titolo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sig.ra Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sig.ra Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale del lavoro di Anversa, Belgio)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "sig.ra Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="lettera di diffida del 10 ottobre 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "sig.ra Vandenbon"->"lettera di diffida del 10 ottobre 2016 10/10/2016";
  "lettera di diffida del 10 ottobre 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "lettera di diffida del 10 ottobre 2016 10/10/2016"->"pagare a ciascuna un’indennità di licenziamento forfettaria di importo pari a sei mesi di stipendio"[dir=none];
  "sig.ra Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale del lavoro di Anversa, Belgio)"[label="hanno chiesto all’arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale del lavoro di Anversa, Belgio) di condannare tale impresa al pagamento di detta indennità.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale del lavoro di Anversa, Belgio)"->"sig.ra Hakelbracht"[label="concesso un risarcimento"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Gan J. Hakelbracht, gan T. Vandenbon ar 2016. gada 10. oktobra vēstuli aicināja WTG Retail pārskaitīt katrai no viņām vienreizēju kompensāciju, kas atbilst sešu mēnešu algai. Nespēdamas panāk vienošanos šajā jautājumā, viņas lūdza arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpenes Darba lietu tiesa, Beļģija) piespriest šim uzņēmumam izmaksāt minēto kompensāciju.
Kā izriet no iesniedzējtiesas nolēmuma, ir skaidrs, ka pamatlietā J. Hakelbracht patiesi bija cietusi no tiešas diskriminācijas dzimuma dēļ, kas bija iemesls, kādēļ iesniedzējtiesa piešķīra viņai kompensāciju šajā ziņā.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpenes Darba lietu tiesa, Beļģija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="2016. gada 10. oktobra vēstuli 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"2016. gada 10. oktobra vēstuli 10/10/2016";
  "2016. gada 10. oktobra vēstuli 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "2016. gada 10. oktobra vēstuli 10/10/2016"->"pārskaitīt katrai no viņām vienreizēju kompensāciju, kas atbilst sešu mēnešu algai."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpenes Darba lietu tiesa, Beļģija)"[label="lūdza arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpenes Darba lietu tiesa, Beļģija) piespriest šim uzņēmumam izmaksāt minēto kompensāciju.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpenes Darba lietu tiesa, Beļģija)"->"J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[label="piešķīra viņai kompensāciju"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2016 m. spalio 10 d. laišku J. Hakelbracht ir T. Vandenbon pareikalavo iš WTG Retail kiekvienai iš jų sumokėti vienkartinę šešių mėnesių darbo užmokesčio dydžio išmoką kaip žalos atlyginimą. Kadangi dėl šio klausimo nepavyko susitarti, jos paprašė Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpeno darbo teismas, Belgija) priteisti iš šios įmonės tą išmoką.
Kaip matyti iš nutarties dėl prašymo priimti prejudicinį sprendimą, pagrindinėje byloje neginčijama, kad J. Hakelbracht iš tikrųjų buvo tiesiogiai diskriminuojama dėl lyties, todėl prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas tuo pagrindu jai priteisė minėtą išmoką.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpeno darbo teismas, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="laišku 10/10/2016"];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"laišku 10/10/2016";
  "laišku 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "laišku 10/10/2016"->"kiekvienai iš jų sumokėti vienkartinę šešių mėnesių darbo užmokesčio dydžio išmoką kaip žalos atlyginimą."[dir=none];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpeno darbo teismas, Belgija)"[label="pareikalavo iš WTG Retail kiekvienai iš jų sumokėti vienkartinę šešių mėnesių darbo užmokesčio dydžio išmoką kaip žalos atlyginimą.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpeno darbo teismas, Belgija)"->"Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[label="priteisė minėtą išmoką."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Mind J. Hakelbracht, mind pedig T. Vandenbon arra szólította fel a WTG Retailt a 2016. október 10‑i levélben, hogy az utóbbi mindegyikőjüknek fizessen hat havi munkabérnek megfelelő összegű átalány‑kártérítést. Mivel nem tudtak e tekintetben megállapodást kötni, azt kérték az arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpentől (antwerpeni munkaügyi bíróság, Belgium), hogy az említett vállalkozást kötelezze e kártérítés megfizetésére.
Amint az az előzetes döntéshozatalra utaló határozatból kitűnik, az alapügyben nem vitatott, hogy J. Hakelbracht ténylegesen nemen alapuló közvetlen hátrányos megkülönböztetés áldozata lett, amely indokból a kérdést előterjesztő bíróság e tekintetben kártérítést ítélt meg számára.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (antwerpeni munkaügyi bíróság, Belgium)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="2016. október 10‑i levélben 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"2016. október 10‑i levélben 10/10/2016";
  "2016. október 10‑i levélben 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "2016. október 10‑i levélben 10/10/2016"->"mindegyikőjüknek fizessen hat havi munkabérnek megfelelő összegű átalány‑kártérítést."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (antwerpeni munkaügyi bíróság, Belgium)"[label="azt kérték az arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpentől (antwerpeni munkaügyi bíróság, Belgium), hogy az említett vállalkozást kötelezze e kártérítés megfizetésére.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (antwerpeni munkaügyi bíróság, Belgium)"->"J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[label="kártérítést ítélt meg"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Kemm J. Hakelbracht kif ukoll T. Vandenbon intimaw lil WTG Retail, permezz ta’ ittra tal-10 ta’ Ottubru 2016, sabiex tħallashom rispettivament kumpens fiss f’ammont li jikkorrispondi għal salarju ta’ sitt xhur. Billi ma setgħux jikkonkludu ftehim dwar dan il-punt, huma talbu lill-arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (il-Qorti tax-Xogħol ta’ Antwerpen, il-Belġju) tikkundanna lil din l-impriża għall-ħlas ta’ dan il-kumpens.
Kif jirriżulta mid-digriet tar-rinviju, huwa stabbilit fil-kawża prinċipali li J. Hakelbracht kienet fil-fatt vittma ta’ diskriminazzjoni diretta bbażata fuq is-sess, li hija r-raġuni li fuq il-bażi tagħha l-qorti tar-rinviju tatha kumpens.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen, il-Belġju)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="ittra 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"ittra 10/10/2016";
  "ittra 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "ittra 10/10/2016"->"tħallashom rispettivament kumpens fiss f’ammont li jikkorrispondi għal salarju ta’ sitt xhur."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen, il-Belġju)"[label="tikkkundanna lil din l-impriża għall-ħlas ta’ dan il-kumpens.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen, il-Belġju)"->"J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[label="tatha kumpens."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Zowel Hakelbracht als Vandenbon heeft bij brief van 10 oktober 2016 WTG Retail in gebreke gesteld om elk van hen een forfaitaire schadevergoeding te betalen gelijk aan zes maanden loon. Aangezien op dit punt geen akkoord kon worden bereikt, hebben zij de arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (België) verzocht die onderneming te veroordelen tot betaling van die schadevergoeding.
Blijkens de verwijzingsbeslissing staat in het hoofdgeding vast dat Hakelbracht daadwerkelijk slachtoffer is geweest van directe discriminatie op grond van geslacht, en om die reden heeft de verwijzende rechter haar schadevergoeding uit dien hoofde toegekend.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (België))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="bij brief van 10 oktober 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"bij brief van 10 oktober 2016 10/10/2016";
  "bij brief van 10 oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "bij brief van 10 oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"elk van hen een forfaitaire schadevergoeding te betalen gelijk aan zes maanden loon."[dir=none];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (België))"[label="hebben zij de arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (België) verzocht die onderneming te veroordelen tot betaling van die schadevergoeding.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (België))"->"Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[label="schadevergoeding toegekend"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Pismem z dnia 10 października 2016 r. zarówno J. Hakelbracht, jak i T. Vandenbon wezwały WTG Retail do zapłaty ryczałtowego odszkodowania w wysokości równej 6-miesięcznemu wynagrodzeniu. Ponieważ strony nie zdołały osiągnąć porozumienia w tej kwestii, J. Hakelbracht i T. Vandenbon wniosły powództwo do arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (sądu pracy w Antwerpii, Belgia), domagając się zasądzenia od tego przedsiębiorstwa zapłaty odszkodowania na ich rzecz.
Jak wynika z postanowienia odsyłającego, w sprawie rozpatrywanej w postępowaniu głównym jest bezsporne, że J. Hakelbracht faktycznie padła ofiarą bezpośredniej dyskryminacji ze względu na płeć, w związku z czym sąd odsyłający przyznał jej odszkodowanie z tego tytułu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (sądu pracy w Antwerpii, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="Pismem z dnia 10 października 2016 r. 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Pismem z dnia 10 października 2016 r. 10/10/2016";
  "Pismem z dnia 10 października 2016 r. 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "Pismem z dnia 10 października 2016 r. 10/10/2016"->"zapłaty ryczałtowego odszkodowania w wysokości równej 6-miesięcznemu wynagrodzeniu"[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (sądu pracy w Antwerpii, Belgia)"[label="domagając się zasądzenia od tego przedsiębiorstwa zapłaty odszkodowania na ich rzecz.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (sądu pracy w Antwerpii, Belgia)"->"J. Hakelbracht, T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[label="przyznał jej odszkodowanie"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Tanto J. Hakelbracht como T. Vandenbon interpelaram a WTG Retail, por carta de 10 de outubro de 2016, para pagar a cada uma delas uma indemnização fixa num montante correspondente a seis meses de remuneração. Não tendo chegado a acordo sobre este ponto, pediram ao arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal do Trabalho de Antuérpia, Bélgica) que condenasse essa empresa no pagamento dessa indemnização.
Como resulta da decisão de reenvio, é pacífico no processo principal que J. Hakelbracht foi efetivamente vítima de uma discriminação direta em razão do sexo, razão pela qual o órgão jurisdicional de reenvio lhe atribuiu uma indemnização a esse título.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal do Trabalho de Antuérpia, Bélgica)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="carta de 10 de outubro de 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"carta de 10 de outubro de 2016 10/10/2016";
  "carta de 10 de outubro de 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "carta de 10 de outubro de 2016 10/10/2016"->"pagar a cada uma delas uma indemnização fixa num montante correspondente a seis meses de remuneração."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal do Trabalho de Antuérpia, Bélgica)"[label="pediram ao arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal do Trabalho de Antuérpia, Bélgica) que condenasse essa empresa no pagamento dessa indemnização.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal do Trabalho de Antuérpia, Bélgica)"->"J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[label="atribuiu uma indemnização"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Atât doamna Hakelbracht, cât și doamna Vandenbon au pus în întârziere WTG Retail, prin scrisoarea din 10 octombrie 2016, solicitând plata unei indemnizații forfetare într‑un cuantum egal cu salariul pe șase luni. Întrucât nu au putut încheia un acord cu privire la acest aspect, ele au solicitat arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Litigii de Muncă din Antwerpen, Belgia) obligarea acestei întreprinderi la plata acestei indemnizații.
Astfel cum reiese din decizia de trimitere, este cert că, în cauza principală, doamna Hakelbracht a fost în mod efectiv victima unei discriminări directe pe criterii de sex, motiv pentru care instanța de trimitere i‑a acordat o despăgubire în acest temei.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "doamna Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "doamna Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Litigii de Muncă din Antwerpen, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "doamna Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="scrisoarea din 10 octombrie 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "doamna Vandenbon"->"scrisoarea din 10 octombrie 2016 10/10/2016";
  "scrisoarea din 10 octombrie 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "scrisoarea din 10 octombrie 2016 10/10/2016"->"plata unei indemnizații forfetare într‑un cuantum egal cu salariul pe șase luni."[dir=none];
  "doamna Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Litigii de Muncă din Antwerpen, Belgia)"[label="Au solicitat arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Litigii de Muncă din Antwerpen, Belgia) obligarea acestei întreprinderi la plata acestei indemnizații.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Litigii de Muncă din Antwerpen, Belgia)"->"doamna Hakelbracht"[label="a acordat o despăgubire"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Pani Hakelbrachtová, ako aj pani Vandenbonová vyzvali WTG Retail listom z 10. októbra 2016, aby každej z nich vyplatil paušálnu náhradu škody v sume zodpovedajúcej platu za šesť mesiacov. Keďže v tomto bode nemohli dospieť k dohode, žiadali Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Pracovný súd Antverpy, Belgicko), aby tejto spoločnosti uložil zaplatiť túto náhradu.
Ako vyplýva z návrhu na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, v konaní vo veci samej je nesporné, že pani Hakelbrachtová bola skutočne obeťou priamej diskriminácie na základe pohlavia, čo je dôvod, pre ktorý jej vnútroštátny súd priznal náhradu škody z tohto titulu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Pani Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Pani Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Pracovný súd Antverpy, Belgicko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Pani Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="listom 10/10/2016"];
  "Pani Vandenbon"->"listom 10/10/2016";
  "listom 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "listom 10/10/2016"->"aby každej z nich vyplatil paušálnu náhradu škody v sume zodpovedajúcej platu za šesť mesiacov."[dir=none];
  "Pani Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Pracovný súd Antverpy, Belgicko)"[label="žiadali Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Pracovný súd Antverpy, Belgicko), aby tejto spoločnosti uložil zaplatiť túto náhradu.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Pracovný súd Antverpy, Belgicko)"->"Pani Hakelbracht"[label="náhradu škody"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Tako J. Hakelbracht kot T. Vandenbon sta od družbe WTG Retail z dopisom z dne 10. oktobra 2016 zahtevali, naj vsaki izplača pavšalno odškodnino v znesku, ki ustreza šestmesečni plači. Ker o tej točki niso sklenili dogovora, sta pri arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (delovno sodišče v Antwerpnu, Belgija) zahtevali, naj to sodišče tej družbi naloži plačilo odškodnine.
Kot izhaja iz predložitvene odločbe, v postopku v glavni stvari ni sporno, da je bila J. Hakelbracht dejansko žrtev neposredne diskriminacije zaradi spola, zaradi česar ji je predložitveno sodišče iz tega naslova dodelilo odškodnino.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (delovno sodišče v Antwerpnu, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="dopisom 10/10/2016"];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"dopisom 10/10/2016";
  "dopisom 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "dopisom 10/10/2016"->"vsaki izplača pavšalno odškodnino v znesku, ki ustreza šestmesečni plači."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (delovno sodišče v Antwerpnu, Belgija)"[label="zahtevali, naj to sodišče tej družbi naloži plačilo odškodnine.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (delovno sodišče v Antwerpnu, Belgija)"->"J. Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[label="dodelilo odškodnino."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Sekä Hakelbracht että Vandenbon vaativat 10.10.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellään WTG Retailia maksamaan kummallekin kiinteämääräisen korvauksen, joka vastaa kuuden kuukauden palkkaa. Koska he eivät päässeet tältä osin sopimukseen, he vaativat arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpeniä (Antwerpenin työoikeudellisten asioiden alioikeus, Belgia) velvoittamaan kyseisen yrityksen maksamaan tämän korvauksen.
Kuten ennakkoratkaisupyynnöstä ilmenee, pääasiassa on selvää, että Hakelbracht joutui sukupuoleen perustuvan välittömän syrjinnän kohteeksi, minkä vuoksi ennakkoratkaisua pyytänyt tuomioistuin myönsi hänelle tätä koskevan vahingonkorvauksen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpeniä (Antwerpenin työoikeudellisten asioiden alioikeus, Belgia))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="10.10.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellään 10/10/2016"];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"10.10.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellään 10/10/2016";
  "10.10.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellään 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "10.10.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellään 10/10/2016"->"maksamaan kummallekin kiinteämääräisen korvauksen, joka vastaa kuuden kuukauden palkkaa."[dir=none];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpeniä (Antwerpenin työoikeudellisten asioiden alioikeus, Belgia))"[label="velvoittamaan kyseisen yrityksen maksamaan tämän korvauksen.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpeniä (Antwerpenin työoikeudellisten asioiden alioikeus, Belgia))"->"Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[label="myönsi hänelle tätä koskevan vahingonkorvauksen."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Såväl Jamina Hakelbracht som Tine Vandenbon förelade WTG Retail i skrivelse av den 10 oktober 2016 att utbetala ersättning till var och en av dem med ett engångsbelopp motsvarande sex månadslöner. Då någon överenskommelse inte nåddes väckte de talan vid arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbetsdomstolen i Antwerpen, Belgien) med yrkande att företaget skulle förpliktas att utge denna ersättning.
Såsom framgår av begäran om förhandsavgörande är det utrett i det nationella målet att Jamina Hakelbracht utsatts för direkt diskriminering på grund av kön, varför nämnda domstol tillerkänt henne ersättning på den grunden.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbetsdomstolen i Antwerpen, Belgien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="skrivelse av den 10 oktober 2016 10/10/2016"];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"skrivelse av den 10 oktober 2016 10/10/2016";
  "skrivelse av den 10 oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"WTG Retail";
  "skrivelse av den 10 oktober 2016 10/10/2016"->"utbetala ersättning till var och en av dem med ett engångsbelopp motsvarande sex månadslöner"[dir=none];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbetsdomstolen i Antwerpen, Belgien)"[label="yrkande att företaget skulle förpliktas att utge denna ersättning.."];
  "The arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (arbetsdomstolen i Antwerpen, Belgien)"->"Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[label="tillerkänt henne ersättning"];
}