mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Greek

Στις 17 Νοεμβρίου 1997, τα καταγγέλλοντα κράτη ζήτησαν, κατ’ εφαρμογήν του άρθρου 21, παράγραφος 3, στοιχείο γ΄, του ΜΕΔ, να καθοριστεί μέσω υποχρεωτικής διαιτησίας το εύλογο χρονικό διάστημα εντός του οποίου η Κοινότητα όφειλε να συμμορφωθεί προς τις υποχρεώσεις της.
Με διαιτητική απόφαση που δημοσιεύθηκε στις 7 Ιανουαρίου 1998, ο διαιτητής που επελήφθη του σχετικού ζητήματος δέχθηκε ότι το ως άνω εύλογο χρονικό διάστημα αφορά την περίοδο μεταξύ της 25ης Σεπτεμβρίου 1997 και της 1ης Ιανουαρίου 1999. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "ΜΕΔ"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "τα καταγγέλλοντα κράτη"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "η Κοινότητα"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ο διαιτητής"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "τα καταγγέλλοντα κράτη"->"ζήτησαν, κατ’ εφαρμογήν του άρθρου 21, παράγραφος 3, στοιχείο γ΄, του ΜΕΔ, να καθοριστεί μέσω υποχρεωτικής διαιτησίας το εύλογο χρονικό διάστημα εντός του οποίου η Κοινότητα όφειλε να συμμορφωθεί προς τις υποχρεώσεις της. 17/11/1997";
  "ζήτησαν, κατ’ εφαρμογήν του άρθρου 21, παράγραφος 3, στοιχείο γ΄, του ΜΕΔ, να καθοριστεί μέσω υποχρεωτικής διαιτησίας το εύλογο χρονικό διάστημα εντός του οποίου η Κοινότητα όφειλε να συμμορφωθεί προς τις υποχρεώσεις της. 17/11/1997"->"ΜΕΔ";
  "ζήτησαν, κατ’ εφαρμογήν του άρθρου 21, παράγραφος 3, στοιχείο γ΄, του ΜΕΔ, να καθοριστεί μέσω υποχρεωτικής διαιτησίας το εύλογο χρονικό διάστημα εντός του οποίου η Κοινότητα όφειλε να συμμορφωθεί προς τις υποχρεώσεις της. 17/11/1997"->"του άρθρου 21, παράγραφος 3, στοιχείο γ΄, του ΜΕΔ"[dir=none];
  "ο διαιτητής"->"δημοσιεύθηκε 07/01/1998";
  "δημοσιεύθηκε 07/01/1998"->"η Κοινότητα";
  "δημοσιεύθηκε 07/01/1998"->"την περίοδο μεταξύ της 25ης Σεπτεμβρίου 1997 και της 1ης Ιανουαρίου 1999"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: French

Le 17 novembre 1997, les États plaignants ont demandé, en application de l’article 21, paragraphe 3, sous c), du MRD, qu’un arbitrage contraignant fixe le délai raisonnable dans lequel la Communauté devrait se conformer à ses obligations.
Par sentence arbitrale publiée le 7 janvier 1998, l’arbitre saisi a retenu à cet effet la période comprise entre le 25 septembre 1997 et le 1er janvier 1999. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "MRD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "les États plaignants"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la Communauté"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l’arbitre saisi"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "les États plaignants"->"les États plaignants ont demandé, en application de l’article 21, paragraphe 3, sous c), du MRD, qu’un arbitrage contraignant fixe le délai raisonnable dans lequel la Communauté devrait se conformer à ses obligations. 17/11/1997";
  "les États plaignants ont demandé, en application de l’article 21, paragraphe 3, sous c), du MRD, qu’un arbitrage contraignant fixe le délai raisonnable dans lequel la Communauté devrait se conformer à ses obligations. 17/11/1997"->"MRD";
  "les États plaignants ont demandé, en application de l’article 21, paragraphe 3, sous c), du MRD, qu’un arbitrage contraignant fixe le délai raisonnable dans lequel la Communauté devrait se conformer à ses obligations. 17/11/1997"->"l’article 21, paragraphe 3, sous c), du MRD"[dir=none];
  "l’arbitre saisi"->"publiée 07/01/1998";
  "publiée 07/01/1998"->"la Communauté";
  "publiée 07/01/1998"->"la période comprise entre le 25 septembre 1997 et le 1er janvier 1999"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Italian

Il 17 novembre 1997 gli Stati che avevano presentato denuncia hanno chiesto, in applicazione dell’art. 21, n. 3, lett. c), dell’IRC, che un arbitrato vincolante stabilisse il termine ragionevole entro cui la Comunità avrebbe dovuto conformarsi ai suoi obblighi.
Con lodo arbitrale pubblicato il 7 gennaio 1998, l’arbitro adito ha stabilito a tal fine il periodo compreso tra il 25 settembre 1997 e il 1° gennaio 1999. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "IRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "gli Stati che avevano presentato denuncia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la Comunità"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l’arbitro"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "gli Stati che avevano presentato denuncia"->"hanno chiesto, in applicazione dell’art. 21, n. 3, lett. c), dell’IRC, che un arbitrato vincolante stabilisse il termine ragionevole entro cui la Comunità avrebbe dovuto conformarsi ai suoi obblighi. 17/11/1997";
  "hanno chiesto, in applicazione dell’art. 21, n. 3, lett. c), dell’IRC, che un arbitrato vincolante stabilisse il termine ragionevole entro cui la Comunità avrebbe dovuto conformarsi ai suoi obblighi. 17/11/1997"->"IRC";
  "hanno chiesto, in applicazione dell’art. 21, n. 3, lett. c), dell’IRC, che un arbitrato vincolante stabilisse il termine ragionevole entro cui la Comunità avrebbe dovuto conformarsi ai suoi obblighi. 17/11/1997"->"art. 21, n. 3, lett. c), dell’IRC"[dir=none];
  "l’arbitro"->"pubblicato 07/01/1998";
  "pubblicato 07/01/1998"->"la Comunità";
  "pubblicato 07/01/1998"->"il periodo compreso tra il 25 settembre 1997 e il 1° gennaio 1999"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Latvian

1997. gada 17. novembrī sūdzētājas valstis, piemērojot VSN 21. panta 3. punkta c) apakšpunktu, lūdza saistošajai arbitrāžai noteikt saprātīgu termiņu Kopienas pienākumu izpildei.
Ar arbitrāžas spriedumu, kas publicēts 1998. gada 7. janvārī, saistošā arbitrāža noteica, ka šis laika periods ir no 1997. gada 25. septembra līdz 1999. gada 1. janvārim. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "VSN"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sūdzētājas valstis"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kopienas"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "saistošā arbitrāža"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "sūdzētājas valstis"->"sūdzētājas valstis, piemērojot VSN 21. panta 3. punkta c) apakšpunktu, lūdza saistošajai arbitrāžai noteikt saprātīgu termiņu Kopienas pienākumu izpildei. 17/11/1997";
  "sūdzētājas valstis, piemērojot VSN 21. panta 3. punkta c) apakšpunktu, lūdza saistošajai arbitrāžai noteikt saprātīgu termiņu Kopienas pienākumu izpildei. 17/11/1997"->"VSN";
  "sūdzētājas valstis, piemērojot VSN 21. panta 3. punkta c) apakšpunktu, lūdza saistošajai arbitrāžai noteikt saprātīgu termiņu Kopienas pienākumu izpildei. 17/11/1997"->"VSN 21. panta 3. punkta c) apakšpunktu"[dir=none];
  "saistošā arbitrāža"->"publicēts 07/01/1998";
  "publicēts 07/01/1998"->"Kopienas";
  "publicēts 07/01/1998"->"Šis laika periods ir no 1997. gada 25. septembra līdz 1999. gada 1. janvārim."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Lithuanian

1997 m. lapkričio 17 d. skundą pateikusios šalys, taikydamos SGS 21 straipsnio 3 dalies c punktą, pareikalavo, kad privalomas arbitražas nustatytų pagrįstą laikotarpį, per kurį Bendrija turėtų įvykdyti savo įsipareigojimus.
1998 m. sausio 7 d. paskelbtame arbitražo sprendime arbitras tuo tikslu nustatė laikotarpį nuo 1997 m. rugsėjo 25 d. iki 1999 m. sausio 1 dienos. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "SGS"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "skundą pateikusios šalys"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Bendrija"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "arbitras"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "skundą pateikusios šalys"->"pareikalavo, kad privalomas arbitražas nustatytų pagrįstą laikotarpį, per kurį Bendrija turėtų įvykdyti savo įsipareigojimus. 17/11/1997";
  "pareikalavo, kad privalomas arbitražas nustatytų pagrįstą laikotarpį, per kurį Bendrija turėtų įvykdyti savo įsipareigojimus. 17/11/1997"->"SGS";
  "pareikalavo, kad privalomas arbitražas nustatytų pagrįstą laikotarpį, per kurį Bendrija turėtų įvykdyti savo įsipareigojimus. 17/11/1997"->"SGS 21 straipsnio 3 dalies c punktą"[dir=none];
  "arbitras"->"paskelbtame 07/01/1998";
  "paskelbtame 07/01/1998"->"Bendrija";
  "paskelbtame 07/01/1998"->"laikotarpį nuo 1997 m. rugsėjo 25 d. iki 1999 m. sausio 1 dienos"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Hungarian

A panaszos államok 1997. november 17‑én kérték a vitarendezési egyetértés 21. cikke 3. pontjának c) alpontja alapján, hogy választottbíróság határozza meg az ésszerű határidőt, amelyen belül a Közösség köteles megfelelni kötelezettségeinek.
Az 1998. január 7‑én kihirdetett választottbírósági határozattal a kijelölt választottbíróság az 1997. szeptember 25. és 1999. január 1. közötti időszakot jelölte ki. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "A kifejezés (DSB) nem szerepel a szövegben."[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "A panaszos államok"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "a Közösség"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "választottbíróság"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "A panaszos államok"->"A panaszos államok 1997. november 17‑én kérték a vitarendezési egyetértés 21. cikke 3. pontjának c) alpontja alapján, hogy választottbíróság határozza meg az ésszerű határidőt, amelyen belül a Közösség köteles megfelelni kötelezettségeinek. 17/11/1997";
  "A panaszos államok 1997. november 17‑én kérték a vitarendezési egyetértés 21. cikke 3. pontjának c) alpontja alapján, hogy választottbíróság határozza meg az ésszerű határidőt, amelyen belül a Közösség köteles megfelelni kötelezettségeinek. 17/11/1997"->"A kifejezés (DSB) nem szerepel a szövegben.";
  "A panaszos államok 1997. november 17‑én kérték a vitarendezési egyetértés 21. cikke 3. pontjának c) alpontja alapján, hogy választottbíróság határozza meg az ésszerű határidőt, amelyen belül a Közösség köteles megfelelni kötelezettségeinek. 17/11/1997"->"A vitarendezési egyetértés 21. cikke 3. pontjának c) alpontja"[dir=none];
  "választottbíróság"->"kihirdetett 07/01/1998";
  "kihirdetett 07/01/1998"->"a Közösség";
  "kihirdetett 07/01/1998"->"az 1997. szeptember 25. és 1999. január 1. közötti időszakot"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Maltese

Fis-17 ta' Novembru 1997, l-Istati li ressqu l-ilment talbu, b'applikazzjoni ta' l-Artikolu 21(3)(c) tad-DSU, li, permezz ta' arbitraġġ vinkolanti, jiġi stabbilit terminu raġonevoli li fih il-Komunità tkun marbuta li tikkonforma ruħha ma' l-obbligi tagħha.
Permezz ta' sentenza arbitrali ppubblikata fis-7 ta' Jannar 1998, l-arbitru stabbilixxa l-perijodu bejn il-25 ta' Settembru 1997 u l-1 ta' Jannar 1999 għal dan l-iskop. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "DSU"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l-Istati li ressqu l-ilment"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "il-Komunità"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l-arbitru"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "l-Istati li ressqu l-ilment"->"Fis-17 ta' Novembru 1997, l-Istati li ressqu l-ilment talbu, b'applikazzjoni ta' l-Artikolu 21(3)(c) tad-DSU, li, permezz ta' arbitraġġ vinkolanti, jiġi stabbilit terminu raġonevoli li fih il-Komunità tkun marbuta li tikkonforma ruħha ma' l-obbligi tagħha. 17/11/1997";
  "Fis-17 ta' Novembru 1997, l-Istati li ressqu l-ilment talbu, b'applikazzjoni ta' l-Artikolu 21(3)(c) tad-DSU, li, permezz ta' arbitraġġ vinkolanti, jiġi stabbilit terminu raġonevoli li fih il-Komunità tkun marbuta li tikkonforma ruħha ma' l-obbligi tagħha. 17/11/1997"->"DSU";
  "Fis-17 ta' Novembru 1997, l-Istati li ressqu l-ilment talbu, b'applikazzjoni ta' l-Artikolu 21(3)(c) tad-DSU, li, permezz ta' arbitraġġ vinkolanti, jiġi stabbilit terminu raġonevoli li fih il-Komunità tkun marbuta li tikkonforma ruħha ma' l-obbligi tagħha. 17/11/1997"->"l-Artikolu 21(3)(c) tad-DSU"[dir=none];
  "l-arbitru"->"ppubblikata 07/01/1998";
  "ppubblikata 07/01/1998"->"il-Komunità";
  "ppubblikata 07/01/1998"->"l-perijodu bejn il-25 ta' Settembru 1997 u l-1 ta' Jannar 1999"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Dutch

Op 17 november 1997 hebben de klagende staten overeenkomstig artikel 21, lid 3, sub c, DSU verzocht dat bij bindende arbitrage een redelijke termijn wordt vastgesteld waarbinnen de Gemeenschap aan haar verplichtingen moet voldoen.
Bij op 7 januari 1998 bekendgemaakte arbitrage-uitspraak heeft de aangezochte arbiter deze bepaald op de periode van 25 september 1997 tot en met 1 januari 1999.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "DSU"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de klagende staten"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de Gemeenschap"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de aangezochte arbiter"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "de klagende staten"->"verzocht dat bij bindende arbitrage een redelijke termijn wordt vastgesteld waarbinnen de Gemeenschap aan haar verplichtingen moet voldoen 17/11/1997";
  "verzocht dat bij bindende arbitrage een redelijke termijn wordt vastgesteld waarbinnen de Gemeenschap aan haar verplichtingen moet voldoen 17/11/1997"->"DSU";
  "verzocht dat bij bindende arbitrage een redelijke termijn wordt vastgesteld waarbinnen de Gemeenschap aan haar verplichtingen moet voldoen 17/11/1997"->"artikel 21, lid 3, sub c, DSU"[dir=none];
  "de aangezochte arbiter"->"bekendgemaakte 07/01/1998";
  "bekendgemaakte 07/01/1998"->"de Gemeenschap";
  "bekendgemaakte 07/01/1998"->"de periode van 25 september 1997 tot en met 1 januari 1999"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Polish

W dniu 17 listopada 1997 r. skarżące państwa wniosły, na podstawie art. 21 ust. 3 lit. c) uzgodnienia, o wyznaczenie przez wiążący arbitraż rozsądnego terminu, w którym Wspólnota miała zadośćuczynić swym zobowiązaniom.
Postanowieniem arbitrażowym opublikowanym w dniu 7 stycznia 1998 r. arbiter powołany do rozstrzygnięcia tej kwestii wyznaczył okres od 25 września 1997 r. do 1 stycznia 1999 r. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "DSU"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "skarżące państwa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Wspólnota"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "arbiter"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "skarżące państwa"->"Wniosły, na podstawie art. 21 ust. 3 lit. c) uzgodnienia, o wyznaczenie przez wiążący arbitraż rozsądnego terminu, w którym Wspólnota miała zadośćuczynić swym zobowiązaniom. 17/11/1997";
  "Wniosły, na podstawie art. 21 ust. 3 lit. c) uzgodnienia, o wyznaczenie przez wiążący arbitraż rozsądnego terminu, w którym Wspólnota miała zadośćuczynić swym zobowiązaniom. 17/11/1997"->"DSU";
  "Wniosły, na podstawie art. 21 ust. 3 lit. c) uzgodnienia, o wyznaczenie przez wiążący arbitraż rozsądnego terminu, w którym Wspólnota miała zadośćuczynić swym zobowiązaniom. 17/11/1997"->"art. 21 ust. 3 lit. c) uzgodnienia"[dir=none];
  "arbiter"->"opublikowanym 07/01/1998";
  "opublikowanym 07/01/1998"->"Wspólnota";
  "opublikowanym 07/01/1998"->"okres od 25 września 1997 r. do 1 stycznia 1999 r."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Portuguese

Em 17 de Novembro de 1997, os Estados queixosos requereram, nos termos do artigo 21.°, n.° 3, alínea c), do MRD, que o prazo razoável dentro do qual a Comunidade devia dar cumprimento às suas obrigações fosse fixado por uma arbitragem vinculativa.
Por sentença arbitral publicada em 7 de Janeiro de 1998, foi fixado um prazo correspondente ao período compreendido entre 25 de Setembro de 1997 e 1 de Janeiro de 1999. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "MRD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "os Estados queixosos"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "a Comunidade"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sentença arbitral"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "os Estados queixosos"->"os Estados queixosos requereram, nos termos do artigo 21.°, n.° 3, alínea c), do MRD, que o prazo razoável dentro do qual a Comunidade devia dar cumprimento às suas obrigações fosse fixado por uma arbitragem vinculativa. 17/11/1997";
  "os Estados queixosos requereram, nos termos do artigo 21.°, n.° 3, alínea c), do MRD, que o prazo razoável dentro do qual a Comunidade devia dar cumprimento às suas obrigações fosse fixado por uma arbitragem vinculativa. 17/11/1997"->"MRD";
  "os Estados queixosos requereram, nos termos do artigo 21.°, n.° 3, alínea c), do MRD, que o prazo razoável dentro do qual a Comunidade devia dar cumprimento às suas obrigações fosse fixado por uma arbitragem vinculativa. 17/11/1997"->"artigo 21.°, n.° 3, alínea c), do MRD"[dir=none];
  "sentença arbitral"->"publicada 07/01/1998";
  "publicada 07/01/1998"->"a Comunidade";
  "publicada 07/01/1998"->"o período compreendido entre 25 de Setembro de 1997 e 1 de Janeiro de 1999"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 17. novembra 1997 štáty sťažovatelia v súlade s článkom 21 ods. 3 písm. c) DUS navrhli, aby sa primeraná lehota, v ktorej Spoločenstvo musí dosiahnuť súlad so svojimi záväzkami, určila záväzným rozhodcovským konaním.
Rozhodcovským rozsudkom uverejneným 7. januára 1998 rozhodca konajúci vo veci určil na tento účel obdobie medzi 25. septembrom 1997 a 1. januárom 1999. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "DUS"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "štáty sťažovatelia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Spoločenstvo"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "rozhodca"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "štáty sťažovatelia"->"navrhli, aby sa primeraná lehota, v ktorej Spoločenstvo musí dosiahnuť súlad so svojimi záväzkami, určila záväzným rozhodcovským konaním. 17/11/1997";
  "navrhli, aby sa primeraná lehota, v ktorej Spoločenstvo musí dosiahnuť súlad so svojimi záväzkami, určila záväzným rozhodcovským konaním. 17/11/1997"->"DUS";
  "navrhli, aby sa primeraná lehota, v ktorej Spoločenstvo musí dosiahnuť súlad so svojimi záväzkami, určila záväzným rozhodcovským konaním. 17/11/1997"->"článkom 21 ods. 3 písm. c) DUS"[dir=none];
  "rozhodca"->"uverejneným 07/01/1998";
  "uverejneným 07/01/1998"->"Spoločenstvo";
  "uverejneným 07/01/1998"->"obdobie medzi 25. septembrom 1997 a 1. januárom 1999."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Slovenian

Države pritožnice so 17. novembra 1997 na podlagi člena 21(3)(c) DPPRS predlagale, naj zavezujoča arbitraža določi razumno obdobje, v katerem bi morala Skupnost izpolniti svoje obveznosti.
Z arbitražno odločbo, objavljeno 7. januarja 1998, je razsodnik, ki mu je bila zadeva predložena, v ta namen določil obdobje med 25. septembrom 1997 in 1. januarjem 1999. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "DPPRS"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Države pritožnice"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Skupnost"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "razsodnik"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Države pritožnice"->"Države pritožnice so 17. novembra 1997 na podlagi člena 21(3)(c) DPPRS predlagale, naj zavezujoča arbitraža določi razumno obdobje, v katerem bi morala Skupnost izpolniti svoje obveznosti. 17/11/1997";
  "Države pritožnice so 17. novembra 1997 na podlagi člena 21(3)(c) DPPRS predlagale, naj zavezujoča arbitraža določi razumno obdobje, v katerem bi morala Skupnost izpolniti svoje obveznosti. 17/11/1997"->"DPPRS";
  "Države pritožnice so 17. novembra 1997 na podlagi člena 21(3)(c) DPPRS predlagale, naj zavezujoča arbitraža določi razumno obdobje, v katerem bi morala Skupnost izpolniti svoje obveznosti. 17/11/1997"->"člena 21(3)(c) DPPRS"[dir=none];
  "razsodnik"->"objavljeno 07/01/1998";
  "objavljeno 07/01/1998"->"Skupnost";
  "objavljeno 07/01/1998"->"obdobje med 25. septembrom 1997 in 1. januarjem 1999"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Finnish

Kantelut tehneet valtiot vaativat 17.11.1997 DSU:n 21 artiklan 3 kohdan c alakohdan nojalla, että sitovassa välimiesmenettelyssä asetetaan kohtuullinen määräaika, jonka kuluessa yhteisön olisi noudatettava velvoitteitaan.
Välitystuomiossa, joka julkaistiin 7.1.1998, kohtuulliseksi määräajaksi asetettiin 25.9.1997–1.1.1999.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "DSU"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kantelut tehneet valtiot"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "yhteisön"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Välitystuomiossa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Kantelut tehneet valtiot"->"Kantelut tehneet valtiot vaativat 17.11.1997 DSU:n 21 artiklan 3 kohdan c alakohdan nojalla, että sitovassa välimiesmenettelyssä asetetaan kohtuullinen määräaika, jonka kuluessa yhteisön olisi noudatettava velvoitteitaan. 17/11/1997";
  "Kantelut tehneet valtiot vaativat 17.11.1997 DSU:n 21 artiklan 3 kohdan c alakohdan nojalla, että sitovassa välimiesmenettelyssä asetetaan kohtuullinen määräaika, jonka kuluessa yhteisön olisi noudatettava velvoitteitaan. 17/11/1997"->"DSU";
  "Kantelut tehneet valtiot vaativat 17.11.1997 DSU:n 21 artiklan 3 kohdan c alakohdan nojalla, että sitovassa välimiesmenettelyssä asetetaan kohtuullinen määräaika, jonka kuluessa yhteisön olisi noudatettava velvoitteitaan. 17/11/1997"->"DSU:n 21 artiklan 3 kohdan c alakohdan"[dir=none];
  "Välitystuomiossa"->"julkaistiin 07/01/1998";
  "julkaistiin 07/01/1998"->"yhteisön";
  "julkaistiin 07/01/1998"->"25.9.1997–1.1.1999"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Swedish

Den 17 november 1997 begärde de klagande staterna, med stöd av artikel 21.3 c i överenskommelsen, att en rimlig tidsfrist inom vilken gemenskapen skulle uppfylla sina skyldigheter skulle fastställas genom bindande skiljedom.
Genom skiljedom som offentliggjordes den 7 januari 1998 fastställdes för detta ändamål en tidsperiod avseende tiden från den 25 september 1997 till den 1 januari 1999. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Förståelse för tvistlösning"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de klagande staterna"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "gemenskapen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "skiljedom"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "de klagande staterna"->"begärde de klagande staterna, med stöd av artikel 21.3 c i överenskommelsen, att en rimlig tidsfrist inom vilken gemenskapen skulle uppfylla sina skyldigheter skulle fastställas genom bindande skiljedom. 17/11/1997";
  "begärde de klagande staterna, med stöd av artikel 21.3 c i överenskommelsen, att en rimlig tidsfrist inom vilken gemenskapen skulle uppfylla sina skyldigheter skulle fastställas genom bindande skiljedom. 17/11/1997"->"Förståelse för tvistlösning";
  "begärde de klagande staterna, med stöd av artikel 21.3 c i överenskommelsen, att en rimlig tidsfrist inom vilken gemenskapen skulle uppfylla sina skyldigheter skulle fastställas genom bindande skiljedom. 17/11/1997"->"artikel 21.3 c i överenskommelsen"[dir=none];
  "skiljedom"->"offentliggjordes 07/01/1998";
  "offentliggjordes 07/01/1998"->"gemenskapen";
  "offentliggjordes 07/01/1998"->"tiden från den 25 september 1997 till den 1 januari 1999"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: English

By adopting Regulation (EC) No 1637/98 of 20 July 1998 amending Regulation No 404/93 (OJ 1998 L 210, p. 28), the Council amended the regime governing trade in bananas with third countries.
The preamble to Regulation No 1637/98 states:
‘(1) … a number of changes are required in the provisions on trade with third countries contained in Title IV of Regulation … No 404/93;
(2) … the Community’s international commitments under the [WTO] and to the other signatories of the Fourth ACP-EC Convention should be met, whilst achieving at the same time the purposes of the [COM for bananas];
…
(9) … operation of this Regulation should be reviewed at the end of an adequate trial period;

…’
On 28 October 1998 the Commission adopted Regulation (EC) No 2362/98 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation No 404/93 regarding imports of bananas into the Community (OJ 1998 L 293, p. 32). This regulation contains the body of provisions necessary for implementation of the new regime governing trade in bananas with third countries, including the transitional measures justified by the imminence of the entry into force of its implementing rules. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "Regulation (EC) No 1637/98"[shape=trapezium];
   "Regulation (EC) No 2362/98"[shape=trapezium];
   "The Community"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "The Community"->"Regulation (EC) No 1637/98"[label="Adopt 20/07/1998"];
   "Regulation (EC) No 1637/98"->"Amending Regulation No 404/93 the regime governing trade in bananas with third countries."[dir=none];
   "The Community"->"Regulation (EC) No 2362/98"[label="Adopt 28/10/1998"];
   "Regulation (EC) No 2362/98"->"This regulation contains the body of provisions necessary for implementation of the new regime governing trade in bananas with third countries, including the transitional measures justified by the imminence of the entry into force of its implementing rules."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Spanish

Mediante la adopción del Reglamento (CE) nº 1637/98, de 20 de julio de 1998, que modifica el Reglamento nº 404/93 (DO L 210, p. 28), el Consejo enmendó el régimen de intercambios de plátanos con países terceros.
La exposición de motivos del Reglamento nº 1637/98 indica:
«1)      […] es necesario realizar una serie de modificaciones del régimen de intercambios con terceros países instaurado por el título IV del Reglamento […] nº 404/93;
2)      […] es conveniente cumplir los compromisos internacionales suscritos por la Comunidad en el ámbito de la [OMC] y los compromisos contraídos con las partes cosignatarias del IV Convenio ACP-CE garantizando al mismo tiempo el cumplimiento de los objetivos de la [OCM del plátano];
[…]
9)      […] conviene examinar el funcionamiento del presente Reglamento al cabo de un período de prueba suficiente;
[…]»
El 28 de octubre de 1998, la Comisión adoptó el Reglamento (CE) nº 2362/98, por el que se establecen disposiciones de aplicación del Reglamento nº 404/93 en lo relativo al régimen de importación de plátanos en la Comunidad (DO L 293, p. 32). Esta norma comprende el conjunto de disposiciones necesarias para la ejecución del nuevo régimen de intercambios de plátanos con países terceros, incluidas las medidas transitorias justificadas por la muy pronta entrada en vigor de sus disposiciones de aplicación. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Reglamento (CE) No 1637/98"[shape=trapezium];
  "Reglamento (CE) No 2362/98"[shape=trapezium];
  "la Comunidad"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "la Comunidad"->"Reglamento (CE) No 1637/98"[label="Mediante la adopción del Reglamento 20/07/1998"];
  "Reglamento (CE) No 1637/98"->"Mediante la adopción del Reglamento (CE) nº 1637/98, de 20 de julio de 1998, que modifica el Reglamento nº 404/93, el Consejo enmendó el régimen de intercambios de plátanos con países terceros.."[dir=none];
  "la Comunidad"->"Reglamento (CE) No 2362/98"[label="Mediante la adopción del Reglamento 28/10/1998"];
  "Reglamento (CE) No 2362/98"->"Esta norma comprende el conjunto de disposiciones necesarias para la ejecución del nuevo régimen de intercambios de plátanos con países terceros, incluidas las medidas transitorias justificadas por la muy pronta entrada en vigor de sus disposiciones de aplicación.."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Czech

Přijetím nařízení (ES) č. 1637/98 ze dne 10. července 1998, kterým se mění nařízení (EHS) č. 404/93 (Úř. věst. L 210, s. 28; Zvl. vyd. 03/23, s. 304), Rada pozměnila režim obchodu s banány s třetími zeměmi.
Preambule nařízení č. 1637/98 uvádí:
„(1)      […] režim obchodu s třetími zeměmi zavedený hlavou IV nařízení […] č. 404/934 je třeba v různých ohledech změnit;
(2) […] je třeba plnit mezinárodní závazky učiněné Společenstvím v rámci [WTO] a závazky vůči ostatním signatářům čtvrté úmluvy AKT-ES a současně zajistit dosahování cílů [SOT s banány];
[…]
(9) […] fungování tohoto nařízení je třeba posoudit po uplynutí přiměřeného zkušebního období;
[…]“
Dne 28. října 1998 přijala Komise nařízení (ES) č. 2362/98, kterým se stanoví prováděcí pravidla k nařízení č. 404/93 o dovozu banánů do Společenství (Úř. věst. L 293, s. 32). Tento předpis obsahuje veškerá nezbytná ustanovení pro provádění nového režimu obchodu s banány s třetími zeměmi, včetně přechodných opatření odůvodněných vstupem v platnost jeho prováděcích pravidel v brzké budoucnosti. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "nařízení (ES) No 1637/98"[shape=trapezium];
  "nařízení (ES) No 2362/98"[shape=trapezium];
  "Společenství"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Společenství"->"nařízení (ES) No 1637/98"[label="Přijetím 20/07/1998"];
  "nařízení (ES) No 1637/98"->"Pozměnění nařízení č. 404/93 režimu obchodu s banány s třetími zeměmi.."[dir=none];
  "Společenství"->"nařízení (ES) No 2362/98"[label="Přijetím 28/10/1998"];
  "nařízení (ES) No 2362/98"->"Tento předpis obsahuje veškerá nezbytná ustanovení pro provádění nového režimu obchodu s banány s třetími zeměmi, včetně přechodných opatření odůvodněných vstupem v platnost jeho prováděcích pravidel v brzké budoucnosti.."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: Danish

Rådet ændrede markedsordningen for samhandelen med bananer med tredjelande ved at vedtage forordning (EF) nr. 1637/98 af 20. juli 1998 om ændring af forordning nr. 404/93 (EFT L 210, s. 28).
Det anføres i præamblen til forordning nr. 1637/98:
»(1) Der bør foretages en række ændringer af den ordning for samhandelen med tredjelande, der findes i afsnit IV i forordning […] nr. 404/93.
(2) Fællesskabets internationale forpligtelser under [WTO], og over for medundertegnerne af fjerde AVS/EF-konvention, bør overholdes, samtidig med at gennemførelsen af målsætningerne for den fælles markedsordning for bananer sikres.
[…]
(9) Der bør efter en tilstrækkelig lang forsøgsperiode foretages en undersøgelse af, hvorledes anvendelsen af denne forordning fungerer.
[…]«
Den 28. oktober 1998 udstedte Kommissionen forordning (EF) nr. 2362/98 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser til forordning nr. 404/93 for så vidt angår ordningen for indførsel af bananer til Fællesskabet (EFT L 293, s. 32). Forordningen indeholder alle de nødvendige bestemmelser for at gennemføre den nye ordning for samhandelen med bananer fra tredjelande, herunder midlertidige foranstaltninger, der er begrundet i den snarlige ikrafttræden af gennemførelsesbestemmelserne. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "forordning (EF) No 1637/98"[shape=trapezium];
  "forordning (EF) No 2362/98"[shape=trapezium];
  "Fællesskabet"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Fællesskabet"->"forordning (EF) No 1637/98"[label="ved at vedtage 20/07/1998"];
  "forordning (EF) No 1637/98"->"Rådet ændrede markedsordningen for samhandelen med bananer med tredjelande ved at vedtage forordning (EF) nr. 1637/98 af 20. juli 1998 om ændring af forordning nr. 404/93."[dir=none];
  "Fællesskabet"->"forordning (EF) No 2362/98"[label="ved at vedtage 28/10/1998"];
  "forordning (EF) No 2362/98"->"Forordningen indeholder alle de nødvendige bestemmelser for at gennemføre den nye ordning for samhandelen med bananer fra tredjelande, herunder midlertidige foranstaltninger, der er begrundet i den snarlige ikrafttræden af gennemførelsesbestemmelserne.."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2005.
Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.
Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage.
Case T-383/00. (2005)
Language: German

Durch den Erlass der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1637/98 vom 20. Juli 1998 zur Änderung der Verordnung Nr. 404/93 (ABl. L 210, S. 28) änderte der Rat die Regelung für den Bananenhandel mit dritten Ländern.
In der Präambel der Verordnung Nr. 1637/98 heißt es:
„(1)      Die Regelung für den Handel mit dritten Ländern gemäß Titel IV der Verordnung … Nr. 404/93 ist in Bezug auf verschiedene Aspekte zu ändern.
(2)      Die von der Gemeinschaft im Rahmen der [WTO] eingegangenen internationalen Verpflichtungen sowie die Verpflichtungen gegenüber den anderen Unterzeichnern des Vierten AKP–EG-Abkommens müssen eingehalten werden; gleichzeitig müssen die Ziele der [Bananenmarktordnung] weiter verfolgt werden.
…
(9)      Die Funktionsweise der mit dieser Verordnung eingeführten Vorschriften [ist] nach einem angemessenen Versuchszeitraum zu prüfen.
…“
Am 28. Oktober 1998 erließ die Kommission die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2362/98 mit Durchführungsvorschriften zur Verordnung Nr. 404/93 betreffend die Einfuhrregelung für Bananen in die Gemeinschaft (ABl. L 293, S. 32). Sie enthält alle zur Durchführung der Neuregelung des Bananenhandels mit dritten Ländern erforderlichen Bestimmungen einschließlich der durch das baldige Inkrafttreten ihrer Durchführungsvorschriften gerechtfertigten Übergangsmaßnahmen. 

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Verordnung (EG) No 1637/98"[shape=trapezium];
  "Verordnung (EG) No 2362/98"[shape=trapezium];
  "die Gemeinschaft"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "die Gemeinschaft"->"Verordnung (EG) No 1637/98"[label="erließ 20/07/1998"];
  "Verordnung (EG) No 1637/98"->"Durch den Erlass der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1637/98 vom 20. Juli 1998 zur Änderung der Verordnung Nr. 404/93 änderte der Rat die Regelung für den Bananenhandel mit dritten Ländern.."[dir=none];
  "die Gemeinschaft"->"Verordnung (EG) No 2362/98"[label="erließ 28/10/1998"];
  "Verordnung (EG) No 2362/98"->"Sie enthält alle zur Durchführung der Neuregelung des Bananenhandels mit dritten Ländern erforderlichen Bestimmungen einschließlich der durch das baldige Inkrafttreten ihrer Durchführungsvorschriften gerechtfertigten Übergangsmaßnahmen.."[dir=none];
}