mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Tras la desestimación de su reclamación previa presentada el 11 de enero de 2017 contra dicha resolución, Onlineshop presentó, el 2 de agosto de 2017, una demanda ante el órgano jurisdiccional remitente.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "el órgano jurisdiccional remitente" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="su reclamación previa"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="desestimación 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"el órgano jurisdiccional remitente" [label="presentó una demanda 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Po zamítnutí předchozí námitky podané dne 11. ledna 2017 proti uvedenému rozhodnutí podala společnost Onlineshop dne 2. srpna 2017 žalobu k předkládajícímu soudu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "předkládající soud" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="předchozí námitky"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="zamítnutí 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"předkládající soud" [label="podala žalobu 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Efter at have fået afslag på sin indledende klage af 11. januar 2017 over denne afgørelse, anlagde Onlineshop den 2. august 2017 sag ved den forelæggende ret.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "den forelæggende ret" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="sin indledende klage"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="afslag 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"den forelæggende ret" [label="anlagde Onlineshop den 2. august 2017 sag 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: German

Nachdem sein am 11. Januar 2017 eingelegter Einspruch gegen die genannte Entscheidung zurückgewiesen worden war, erhob Onlineshop am 2. August 2017 beim vorlegenden Gericht Klage.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "das vorlegende Gericht" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="sein am 11. Januar 2017 eingelegter Einspruch gegen die genannte Entscheidung"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="zurückgewiesen 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"das vorlegende Gericht" [label="erhob Onlineshop am 2. August 2017 beim vorlegenden Gericht Klage. 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Onlineshop esitas selle otsuse peale 11. jaanuaril 2017 vaide, mis jäeti rahuldamata; seejärel esitas ta 2. augustil 2017 eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohtule kaebuse.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="eelotsusetaotluse"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="rahuldamata 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus" [label="esitas ta 2. augustil 2017 eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohtule kaebuse. 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Μετά την απόρριψη της προηγούμενης διοικητικής προσφυγής της που ασκήθηκε στις 11 Ιανουαρίου 2017 κατά της εν λόγω αποφάσεως, η Onlineshop άσκησε, στις 2 Αυγούστου 2017, ένδικη προσφυγή ενώπιον του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "αιτούντος δικαστηρίου" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="προηγούμενης διοικητικής προσφυγής"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="απόρριψη 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"αιτούντος δικαστηρίου" [label="άσκησε, στις 2 Αυγούστου 2017, ένδικη προσφυγή 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: French

Après le rejet de sa réclamation préalable introduite le 11 janvier 2017 contre ladite décision, Onlineshop a, le 2 août 2017, saisi la juridiction de renvoi d’un recours.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "la juridiction de renvoi" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="sa réclamation préalable"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="rejet 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"la juridiction de renvoi" [label="saisi la juridiction de renvoi d’un recours 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Nakon što je odbijen njegov prethodni prigovor protiv navedene odluke, podnesen 11. siječnja 2017., Onlineshop je 2. kolovoza 2017. podnio tužbu pred sudom koji je uputio zahtjev.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "sud koji je uputio zahtjev" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="njegov prethodni prigovor"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="odbijen 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"sud koji je uputio zahtjev" [label="podnio tužbu 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Successivamente al rigetto del suo previo reclamo proposto l’11 gennaio 2017 avverso detta decisione, la Onlineshop, il 2 agosto 2017, ha presentato un ricorso dinanzi al giudice del rinvio.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "il giudice del rinvio" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="il suo previo reclamo"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="rigetto 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"il giudice del rinvio" [label="ha presentato un ricorso 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Pēc sākotnējās sūdzības, kura par minēto lēmumu tika iesniegta 2017. gada 11. janvārī, Onlineshop2017. gada 2. augustā cēla prasību iesniedzējtiesā.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):

digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "iesniedzējtiesā" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="sākotnējās sūdzības"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="Atteikums 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"iesniedzējtiesā" [label="cēla prasību 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Po to, kai buvo atmestas Onlineshop išankstinis skundas, 2017 m. sausio 11 d. pateiktas dėl minėto sprendimo, 2017 m. rugpjūčio 2 d.Onlineshop kreipėsi į prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikusį teismą.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "pateikusį teismą" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="išankstinis skundas"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="atmestas 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"pateikusį teismą" [label="kreipėsi į prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Miután az említett határozattal szemben 2017. január 11‑én benyújtott előzetes panaszát elutasították, az Onlineshop 2017. augusztus 2‑án keresetet indított a kérdést előterjesztő bíróságnál.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "a kérdést előterjesztő bíróságnál" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="előzetes panaszát"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="elutasították 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"a kérdést előterjesztő bíróságnál" [label="keresetet indított 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Wara ċ-ċaħda tal-ilment preċedenti tagħha ppreżentat fil-11 ta’ Jannar 2017 kontra din id-deċiżjoni, fit-2 ta’ Awwissu 2017 Onlineshop adixxiet lill-qorti tar-rinviju b’rikors.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "lill-qorti tar-rinviju" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="ċ-ċaħda tal-ilment preċedenti"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="ċ-ċaħda 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"lill-qorti tar-rinviju" [label="adixxiet lill-qorti tar-rinviju b’rikors. 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Na de afwijzing van haar op 11 januari 2017 ingediende voorafgaande bezwaar, heeft Onlineshop op 2 augustus 2017 beroep ingesteld bij de verwijzende rechter.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "de verwijzende rechter" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="voorafgaande bezwaar"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="afwijzing 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"de verwijzende rechter" [label="beroep ingesteld 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Po oddaleniu odwołania wniesionego na tę decyzję w dniu 11 stycznia 2017 r. spółka Onlineshop wniosła w dniu 2 sierpnia 2017 r. skargę do sądu odsyłającego.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "sąd odsyłający" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="odwołania"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="oddaleniu 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"sąd odsyłający" [label="wniosła skargę 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Após o indeferimento da sua reclamação prévia apresentada em 11 de janeiro de 2017 contra a referida decisão, a Onlineshop, em 2 de agosto de 2017, interpôs recurso no órgão jurisdicional de reenvio.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "órgão jurisdicional de reenvio" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="a sua reclamação prévia"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="indeferimento 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"órgão jurisdicional de reenvio" [label="interpôs recurso 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

După respingerea plângerii sale prealabile introduse la 11 ianuarie 2017 împotriva deciziei respective, Onlineshop a sesizat cu o acțiune, la 2 august 2017, instanța de trimitere.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "instanța de trimitere" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="plângerii sale prealabile"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="respingerea 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"instanța de trimitere" [label="a sesizat cu o acțiune 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Onlineshop najprv podala 11. januára 2017 proti uvedenému rozhodnutiu sťažnosť, ktorá bola zamietnutá, a následne podala 2. augusta 2017 žalobu na vnútroštátny súd.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "vnútroštátny súd" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="Onlineshop najprv podala 11. januára 2017 proti uvedenému rozhodnutiu sťažnosť"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="zamietnutá 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"vnútroštátny súd" [label="podala žalobu 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Družba Onlineshop je 2. avgusta 2017 po zavrnitvi njenega ugovora zoper navedeno odločbo, vloženega 11. januarja 2017, pri predložitvenem sodišču vložila tožbo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "predložitvenem sodišču" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="ugovora zoper navedeno odločbo"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="zavrnitvi 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"predložitvenem sodišču" [label="vložila tožbo 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Kun Onlineshopin 11.1.2017 tekemä oikaisuvaatimus mainitusta päätöksestä hylättiin, se nosti 2.8.2017 kanteen ennakkoratkaisua pyytäneessä tuomioistuimessa.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ennakkoratkaisua pyytäneessä tuomioistuimessa." [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="oikaisuvaatimus"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="hylättiin 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"ennakkoratkaisua pyytäneessä tuomioistuimessa." [label="nosti kanteen 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Onlineshop har den 2 augusti 2017, efter avslag på sin begäran om omprövning av detta beslut, vilken ingavs den 11 januari 2017, överklagat till den hänskjutande domstolen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "den hänskjutande domstolen" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"ANAF-DGV" [label="begäran om omprövning av detta beslut"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Onlineshop" [label="avslag 11/01/2017"];
    "Onlineshop"->"den hänskjutande domstolen" [label="överklagat till den hänskjutande domstolen. 02/08/2017"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: English

That court observes that Onlineshop claims, in support of its request for the apparatus at issue in the main proceedings to be classified under subheading 85269120 of the CN, that the principal function performed by the apparatus is GPS navigation through two pre-installed navigation applications, while the ANAF-DGV contends that none of the functions of the apparatus gives it its essential character and that the apparatus must therefore be classified under the heading which occurs last in numerical order among those which equally merit consideration, namely heading 8528, which corresponds to its function as a monitor for video reproduction.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "The referring court" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"The referring court" [label="The apparatus should be classified under subheading 85269120 of the CN since the principal function performed by the apparatus is GPS navigation through two pre-installed navigation applications"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"The referring court" [label="None of the functions of the apparatus gives it its essential character and that the apparatus must therefore be classified under the heading which occurs last in numerical order among those which equally merit consideration, namely heading 8528."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

Тази юрисдикция посочва, че в подкрепа на искането си за класиране на разглеждания апарат в подпозиция 85269120 от КН Onlineshop твърди, че основната функция на апарата е GPS навигация посредством две предварително инсталирани навигационни приложения, а ANAF-DGV поддържа, че нито една от функциите на този апарат не определя основния му характер и че следователно той трябва да бъде класиран в последната по ред на номериране позиция от тези, които могат да се вземат предвид, а именно позиция 8528, която съответства на функцията му на монитор за видеовъзпроизвеждане.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Тази юрисдикция" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"Тази юрисдикция" [label="искането си за класиране на разглеждания апарат в подпозиция 85269120 от КН Onlineshop твърди, че основната функция на апарата е GPS навигация посредством две предварително инсталирани навигационни приложения"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Тази юрисдикция" [label="че нито една от функциите на този апарат не определя основния му характер и че следователно той трябва да бъде класиран в последната по ред на номериране позиция от тези, които могат да се вземат предвид, а именно позиция 8528."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Dicho órgano jurisdiccional señala que Onlineshop alega, en apoyo de su pretensión de clasificación del aparato de que se trata en el litigio principal en la subpartida 85269120 de la NC, que la función principal del mismo es la navegación GPS a través de dos aplicaciones de navegación preinstaladas, mientras que ANAF-DGV afirma que ninguna de las funciones de dicho aparato le confiere su carácter esencial y que, en consecuencia, debe clasificarse en la última partida por orden de numeración entre las susceptibles de tenerse razonablemente en cuenta, a saber, la partida 8528, que corresponde a su función de monitor para la reproducción de vídeo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Dicho órgano jurisdiccional" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"Dicho órgano jurisdiccional" [label="Onlineshop alega, en apoyo de su pretensión de clasificación del aparato de que se trata en el litigio principal en la subpartida 85269120 de la NC, que la función principal del mismo es la navegación GPS a través de dos aplicaciones de navegación preinstaladas."];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Dicho órgano jurisdiccional" [label="ANAF-DGV afirma que ninguna de las funciones de dicho aparato le confiere su carácter esencial y que, en consecuencia, debe clasificarse en la última partida por orden de numeración entre las susceptibles de tenerse razonablemente en cuenta, a saber, la partida 8528."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Tento soud uvádí, že společnost Onlineshop na podporu své žádosti o zařazení přístroje dotčeného v původním řízení do podpoložky 85269120 KN tvrdí, že jeho hlavní funkcí je GPS navigace prostřednictvím dvou předinstalovaných navigačních aplikací, zatímco ANAF-DGV tvrdí, že žádná z funkcí tohoto přístroje mu nepropůjčuje jeho podstatný charakter, a že musí být proto zařazen do posledního z čísel, která podle pořadí přicházejí stejnou měrou v úvahu, a sice do čísla 8528, které odpovídá jeho funkci monitoru pro reprodukci videozáznamu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tento soud" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"Tento soud" [label="Společnost Onlineshop na podporu své žádosti o zařazení přístroje dotčeného v původním řízení do podpoložky 85269120 KN tvrdí, že jeho hlavní funkcí je GPS navigace prostřednictvím dvou předinstalovaných navigačních aplikací."];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Tento soud" [label="že žádná z funkcí tohoto přístroje mu nepropůjčuje jeho podstatný charakter, a že musí být proto zařazen do posledního z čísel, která podle pořadí přicházejí stejnou měrou v úvahu, a sice do čísla 8528."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den forelæggende ret har anført, at Onlineshop til støtte for sin påstand om, at det i hovedsagen omhandlede apparat skal tariferes i KN-underposition 85269120, har gjort gældende, at apparatets hovedfunktion er GPS-navigering ved hjælp af to forhåndsinstallerede navigeringsapplikationer, mens ANAF-DGV har gjort gældende, at ingen af apparatets funktioner er karaktergivende, og at dette følgelig skal tariferes i den position, som har det højeste nummer blandt de positioner, der i lige grad kan komme i betragtning, dvs. position 8528 svarende til dets funktion som monitor til videogengivelse.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Den forelæggende ret" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"Den forelæggende ret" [label="Onlineshop til støtte for sin påstand om, at det i hovedsagen omhandlede apparat skal tariferes i KN-underposition 85269120, har gjort gældende, at apparatets hovedfunktion er GPS-navigering ved hjælp af to forhåndsinstallerede navigeringsapplikationer"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Den forelæggende ret" [label="Ingen af apparatets funktioner er karaktergivende, og at dette følgelig skal tariferes i den position, som har det højeste nummer blandt de positioner, der i lige grad kan komme i betragtning, dvs. position 8528."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: German

Das vorlegende Gericht weist darauf hin, dass Onlineshop zur Stützung seines Antrags auf Einreihung des im Ausgangsverfahren in Rede stehenden Geräts in die Unterposition 85269120 der KN geltend mache, dass die Hauptfunktion dieses Geräts die GPS-Navigation mittels zweier vorinstallierter Navigationsanwendungen sei, während die ANAF‑DGV geltend mache, dass keine der Funktionen des Geräts diesem seinen wesentlichen Charakter verleihe und es folglich in die Position einzureihen sei, die unter den in Betracht kommenden Positionen an letzter Stelle stehe, nämlich die Position 8528, die ihrer Funktion als Monitor für die Videowiedergabe entspreche.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Das vorlegende Gericht" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"Das vorlegende Gericht" [label="Onlineshop zur Stützung seines Antrags auf Einreihung des im Ausgangsverfahren in Rede stehenden Geräts in die Unterposition 85269120 der KN geltend mache, dass die Hauptfunktion dieses Geräts die GPS-Navigation mittels zweier vorinstallierter Navigationsanwendungen sei."];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Das vorlegende Gericht" [label="Keine der Funktionen des Geräts diesem seinen wesentlichen Charakter verleihe und es folglich in die Position einzureihen sei, die unter den in Betracht kommenden Positionen an letzter Stelle stehe, nämlich die Position 8528."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

See kohus märgib, et Onlineshop väidab – põhistamaks oma taotlust klassifitseerida põhikohtuasjas kõne all olev seade KNi alamrubriiki 85269120 –, et seadme põhifunktsioon on GPS navigatsioon kahe eelnevalt installeeritud navigeerimisrakenduse abil; ANAF-DGV väidab omakorda, et ükski selle seadme funktsioonidest ei anna selle põhiomadusi, mistõttu see tuleb klassifitseerida rubriiki, mis on seda võrdsel määral kirjeldavate rubriikide numbrilises järjestuses kõige viimane, see tähendab rubriiki 8528, mis vastab seadme video taasesitamise monitori funktsioonile.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "See kohus" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"See kohus" [label="Onlineshop väidab – põhistamaks oma taotlust klassifitseerida põhikohtuasjas kõne all olev seade KNi alamrubriiki 85269120 –, et seadme põhifunktsioon on GPS navigatsioon kahe eelnevalt installeeritud navigeerimisrakenduse abil."];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"See kohus" [label="ükski selle seadme funktsioonidest ei anna selle põhiomadusi, mistõttu see tuleb klassifitseerida rubriiki, mis on seda võrdsel määral kirjeldavate rubriikide numbrilises järjestuses kõige viimane, see tähendab rubriiki 8528."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Το εν λόγω δικαστήριο επισημαίνει ότι η Onlineshop διατείνεται, προς στήριξη της αιτήσεώς της για την κατάταξη της επίμαχης στην υπόθεση της κύριας δίκης συσκευής στη διάκριση 85269120 της ΣΟ, ότι η κύρια λειτουργία της είναι η πλοήγηση GPS μέσω δύο προεγκατεστημένων εφαρμογών πλοήγησης, ενώ η ANAF‑DGV υποστηρίζει ότι καμία από τις λειτουργίες της εν λόγω συσκευής δεν της προσδίδει τον ουσιώδη χαρακτήρα της και ότι, ως εκ τούτου, η εν λόγω συσκευή πρέπει να καταταχθεί στην τελευταία κατά σειρά αρίθμησης κλάση μεταξύ εκείνων που μπορούν βασίμως να ληφθούν υπόψη, δηλαδή στην κλάση 8528, η οποία αντιστοιχεί στη λειτουργία της ως οθόνης απεικόνισης για την αναπαραγωγή εικόνας βίντεο.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Το εν λόγω δικαστήριο" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"Το εν λόγω δικαστήριο" [label="Το εν λόγω δικαστήριο επισημαίνει ότι η Onlineshop διατείνεται, προς στήριξη της αιτήσεώς της για την κατάταξη της επίμαχης στην υπόθεση της κύριας δίκης συσκευής στη διάκριση 85269120 της ΣΟ, ότι η κύρια λειτουργία της είναι η πλοήγηση GPS μέσω δύο προεγκατεστημένων εφαρμογών πλοήγησης"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Το εν λόγω δικαστήριο" [label="καμία από τις λειτουργίες της εν λόγω συσκευής δεν της προσδίδει τον ουσιώδη χαρακτήρα της και ότι, ως εκ τούτου, η εν λόγω συσκευή πρέπει να καταταχθεί στην τελευταία κατά σειρά αρίθμησης κλάση μεταξύ εκείνων που μπορούν βασίμως να ληφθούν υπόψη, δηλαδή στην κλάση 8528."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: French

Cette juridiction relève qu’Onlineshop allègue, au soutien de sa demande de classement de l’appareil en cause au principal dans la sous-position 85269120 de la NC, que la fonction principale de ce dernier est la navigation GPS au moyen de deux applications de navigation préinstallées, tandis que l’ANAF-DGV soutient qu’aucune des fonctions de cet appareil ne lui confère son caractère essentiel et que, par suite, celui-ci doit être classé dans la position placée la dernière par ordre de numérotation parmi celles susceptibles d’être valablement prises en considération, à savoir la position 8528, qui correspond à sa fonction de moniteur pour la reproduction vidéo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Cette juridiction" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"Cette juridiction" [label="Onlineshop allègue, au soutien de sa demande de classement de l’appareil en cause au principal dans la sous-position 85269120 de la NC, que la fonction principale de ce dernier est la navigation GPS au moyen de deux applications de navigation préinstallées"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Cette juridiction" [label="aucune des fonctions de cet appareil ne lui confère son caractère essentiel et que, par suite, celui-ci doit être classé dans la position placée la dernière par ordre de numérotation parmi celles susceptibles d’être valablement prises en considération, à savoir la position 8528."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Taj sud iznosi da Onlineshop navodi, u prilog svojem zahtjevu za razvrstavanje uređaja koji je predmet glavnog postupka u podbroj 85269120 KN‑a, da je njegova glavna funkcija GPS navigacija putem dviju prethodno ugrađenih aplikacija, dok ANAF‑DGV navodi da nijedna od funkcija tog uređaja proizvodu ne daje temeljno obilježje i da on posljedično mora biti razvrstan pod broj koji dolazi posljednji po redu od onih tarifnih brojeva koji mogu doći u obzir, to jest broj 8528 koji odgovara funkciji monitora za reprodukciju videozapisa.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Taj sud" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"Taj sud" [label="Onlineshop navodi, u prilog svojem zahtjevu za razvrstavanje uređaja koji je predmet glavnog postupka u podbroj 85269120 KN‑a, da je njegova glavna funkcija GPS navigacija putem dviju prethodno ugrađenih aplikacija"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Taj sud" [label="ANAF‑DGV navodi da nijedna od funkcija tog uređaja proizvodu ne daje temeljno obilježje i da on posljedično mora biti razvrstan pod broj koji dolazi posljednji po redu od onih tarifnih brojeva koji mogu doći u obzir, to jest broj 8528 koji odgovara funkciji monitora za reprodukciju videozapisa."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Detto giudice rileva che la Onlineshop afferma, a sostegno della sua domanda di classificazione dell’apparecchio in discussione nel procedimento principale nella sottovoce 85269120 della NC, che la funzione principale del medesimo è la navigazione GPS mediante due applicazioni di navigazione preinstallate, mentre l’ANAF‑DGV sostiene che nessuna delle funzioni di tale apparecchio gli conferisce il suo carattere essenziale e che, di conseguenza, esso deve essere classificato nella voce che, in ordine di numerazione, è posta per ultima tra quelle suscettibili di essere validamente prese in considerazione, vale a dire la voce 8528, corrispondente alla funzione di monitor per la riproduzione video.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Detto giudice" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"Detto giudice" [label="La Onlineshop afferma, a sostegno della sua domanda di classificazione dell’apparecchio in discussione nel procedimento principale nella sottovoce 85269120 della NC, che la funzione principale del medesimo è la navigazione GPS mediante due applicazioni di navigazione preinstallate."];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Detto giudice" [label="Nessuna delle funzioni di tale apparecchio gli conferisce il suo carattere essenziale e che, di conseguenza, esso deve essere classificato nella voce che, in ordine di numerazione, è posta per ultima tra quelle suscettibili di essere validamente prese in considerazione, vale a dire la voce 8528."];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Atbilstoši šīs tiesas norādītajam Onlineshop, lai pamatotu savu prasību pamatlietā aplūkoto ierīci klasificēt KN apakšpozīcijā 85269120, apgalvo, ka tās galvenā funkcija ir GPS navigācija, izmantojot divas iepriekš instalētas lietojumprogrammas, savukārt ANAF‑DGV apgalvo, ka neviena no šīs ierīces funkcijām tai nepiešķir pamatīpašības un līdz ar to tā ir jāklasificē pozīcijā ar lielāko kārtas numuru no vienlīdz pieļaujamām pozīcijām, proti, pozīcijā 8528, kas atbilst tās kā monitora video reproducēšanai funkcijai.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "šīs tiesas" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"šīs tiesas" [label="Lai pamatotu savu prasību pamatlietā aplūkoto ierīci klasificēt KN apakšpozīcijā 85269120, apgalvo, ka tās galvenā funkcija ir GPS navigācija, izmantojot divas iepriekš instalētas lietojumprogrammas"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"šīs tiesas" [label="neviena no šīs ierīces funkcijām tai nepiešķir pamatīpašības un līdz ar to tā ir jāklasificē pozīcijā ar lielāko kārtas numuru no vienlīdz pieļaujamām pozīcijām, proti, pozīcijā 8528"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Šis teismas nurodo, kad Onlineshop savo prašymą dėl nagrinėjamo įrenginio klasifikavimo KN 85269120 subpozicijoje grindžia tuo, kad pagrindinė šio įrenginio funkcija yra GPS navigacija naudojantis dviem iš anksto įdiegtomis navigacijos aplikacijomis, o ANAF-DGV tvirtina, kad nė viena šio įrenginio funkcijų nesuteikia jam esminio pobūdžio, todėl jis turi būti klasifikuojamas pozicijoje, pagal numeraciją užimančioje paskutinę vietą tarp pozicijų, į kurias gali būti pagrįstai atsižvelgiama, t. y. 8528 pozicijoje, kuri atitinka jo, kaip monitoriaus, skirto atkurti vaizdui, funkciją.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Šis teismas" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"Šis teismas" [label="Onlineshop savo prašymą dėl nagrinėjamo įrenginio klasifikavimo KN 85269120 subpozicijoje grindžia tuo, kad pagrindinė šio įrenginio funkcija yra GPS navigacija naudojantis dviem iš anksto įdiegtomis navigacijos aplikacijomis"];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"Šis teismas" [label="nė viena šio įrenginio funkcijų nesuteikia jam esminio pobūdžio, todėl jis turi būti klasifikuojamas pozicijoje, pagal numeraciją užimančioje paskutinę vietą tarp pozicijų, į kurias gali būti pagrįstai atsižvelgiama, t. y. 8528 pozicijoje"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală a Vămilor.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 8526 91 20 and 8528 59 00 — Multi-functional GPS navigation system.
Case C-268/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

E bíróság megjegyzi, hogy az Onlineshop azon kérelmének az alátámasztása céljából, hogy az alapügyben szóban forgó készüléket a KN 85269120 vámtarifaalszáma alá sorolják be, azt állítja, hogy ez utóbbi fő funkciója az előre telepített két navigációs alkalmazás révén a GPS‑navigáció, míg az ANAF‑DGV azt állítja, hogy e készülék egyik funkciója sem kölcsönzi annak elsődleges jellegét, ennélfogva pedig azt az egyaránt szóba jöhető vámtarifaszámok közül számsorrendben az utolsó, vagyis a 8528 vámtarifaszám alá kell besorolni, amely e készüléknek a videó lejátszására szolgáló monitor funkciójának felel meg.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Onlineshop" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ANAF-DGV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "E bíróság" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Onlineshop"->"E bíróság" [label="Az alapügyben szóban forgó készüléket a KN 85269120 vámtarifaalszáma alá sorolják be, azt állítja, hogy ez utóbbi fő funkciója az előre telepített két navigációs alkalmazás révén a GPS‑navigáció."];
    "ANAF-DGV"->"E bíróság" [label="E készülék egyik funkciója sem kölcsönzi annak elsődleges jellegét, ennélfogva pedig azt az egyaránt szóba jöhető vámtarifaszámok közül számsorrendben az utolsó, vagyis a 8528 vámtarifaszám alá kell besorolni."];
}