mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

O Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Bacău) deu provimento parcial ao recurso, condenando a Blue Air a pagar a cada um dos recorrentes no processo principal 400 euros a título de reparação dos danos morais e julgando improcedentes os outros pedidos que estes apresentaram.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "os recorrentes"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Bacău)"->"O Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Bacău) deu provimento parcial ao recurso, condenando a Blue Air a pagar a cada um dos recorrentes no processo principal 400 euros a título de reparação dos danos morais e julgando improcedentes os outros pedidos que estes apresentaram.";
  "O Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Bacău) deu provimento parcial ao recurso, condenando a Blue Air a pagar a cada um dos recorrentes no processo principal 400 euros a título de reparação dos danos morais e julgando improcedentes os outros pedidos que estes apresentaram."->"Blue Air";
  "O Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Bacău) deu provimento parcial ao recurso, condenando a Blue Air a pagar a cada um dos recorrentes no processo principal 400 euros a título de reparação dos danos morais e julgando improcedentes os outros pedidos que estes apresentaram."->"os recorrentes";
  "O Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Bacău) deu provimento parcial ao recurso, condenando a Blue Air a pagar a cada um dos recorrentes no processo principal 400 euros a título de reparação dos danos morais e julgando improcedentes os outros pedidos que estes apresentaram."->"EUR 400 as compensation for non-material damage."[dir=none];
  "O Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Bacău) deu provimento parcial ao recurso, condenando a Blue Air a pagar a cada um dos recorrentes no processo principal 400 euros a título de reparação dos danos morais e julgando improcedentes os outros pedidos que estes apresentaram."->"julgando improcedentes os outros pedidos que estes apresentaram.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Judecătoria Bacău a admis în parte cererea, obligând Blue Air să achite fiecăruia dintre reclamanții din litigiul principal 400 de euro reprezentând daune morale și respingând restul pretențiilor acestora.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Judecătoria Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "reclamanții"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Judecătoria Bacău)"->"obligând Blue Air să achite fiecăruia dintre reclamanții din litigiul principal 400 de euro reprezentând daune morale";
  "obligând Blue Air să achite fiecăruia dintre reclamanții din litigiul principal 400 de euro reprezentând daune morale"->"Blue Air";
  "obligând Blue Air să achite fiecăruia dintre reclamanții din litigiul principal 400 de euro reprezentând daune morale"->"reclamanții";
  "obligând Blue Air să achite fiecăruia dintre reclamanții din litigiul principal 400 de euro reprezentând daune morale"->"EUR 400 as compensation for non-material damage."[dir=none];
  "obligând Blue Air să achite fiecăruia dintre reclamanții din litigiul principal 400 de euro reprezentând daune morale"->"respingând restul pretențiilor acestora.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Judecătoria Bacău (Súd prvého stupňa Bacău) čiastočne vyhovel žalobe, pričom uložil spoločnosti Blue Air povinnosť zaplatiť každému zo žalobcov vo veci samej sumu 400 eur ako náhradu nemajetkovej ujmy a zamietol ostatné návrhy predložené týmito žalobcami.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Súd prvého stupňa Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "žalobcov"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Súd prvého stupňa Bacău)"->"uložil spoločnosti Blue Air povinnosť zaplatiť každému zo žalobcov vo veci samej sumu 400 eur ako náhradu nemajetkovej ujmy a zamietol ostatné návrhy predložené týmito žalobcami.";
  "uložil spoločnosti Blue Air povinnosť zaplatiť každému zo žalobcov vo veci samej sumu 400 eur ako náhradu nemajetkovej ujmy a zamietol ostatné návrhy predložené týmito žalobcami."->"Blue Air";
  "uložil spoločnosti Blue Air povinnosť zaplatiť každému zo žalobcov vo veci samej sumu 400 eur ako náhradu nemajetkovej ujmy a zamietol ostatné návrhy predložené týmito žalobcami."->"žalobcov";
  "uložil spoločnosti Blue Air povinnosť zaplatiť každému zo žalobcov vo veci samej sumu 400 eur ako náhradu nemajetkovej ujmy a zamietol ostatné návrhy predložené týmito žalobcami."->"EUR 400 as compensation for non-material damage."[dir=none];
  "uložil spoločnosti Blue Air povinnosť zaplatiť každému zo žalobcov vo veci samej sumu 400 eur ako náhradu nemajetkovej ujmy a zamietol ostatné návrhy predložené týmito žalobcami."->"a zamietol ostatné návrhy predložené týmito žalobcami.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Judecătoria Bacău (prvostopenjsko sodišče v Bacăuu) je delno ugodilo tožbi in družbi Blue Air naložilo plačilo odškodnine v višini 400 EUR vsaki od tožečih strank iz postopka v glavni stvari iz naslova nepremoženjske škode ter zavrnilo njune ostale zahtevke.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Judecătoria Bacău (prvostopenjsko sodišče v Bacăuu))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "tožeče stranke"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Judecătoria Bacău (prvostopenjsko sodišče v Bacăuu))"->"naložilo plačilo odškodnine v višini 400 EUR vsaki od tožečih strank iz postopka v glavni stvari iz naslova nepremoženjske škode ter zavrnilo njune ostale zahtevke.";
  "naložilo plačilo odškodnine v višini 400 EUR vsaki od tožečih strank iz postopka v glavni stvari iz naslova nepremoženjske škode ter zavrnilo njune ostale zahtevke."->"Blue Air";
  "naložilo plačilo odškodnine v višini 400 EUR vsaki od tožečih strank iz postopka v glavni stvari iz naslova nepremoženjske škode ter zavrnilo njune ostale zahtevke."->"tožeče stranke";
  "naložilo plačilo odškodnine v višini 400 EUR vsaki od tožečih strank iz postopka v glavni stvari iz naslova nepremoženjske škode ter zavrnilo njune ostale zahtevke."->"EUR 400 as compensation for non-material damage."[dir=none];
  "naložilo plačilo odškodnine v višini 400 EUR vsaki od tožečih strank iz postopka v glavni stvari iz naslova nepremoženjske škode ter zavrnilo njune ostale zahtevke."->"zavrnilo njune ostale zahtevke."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Judecătoria Bacău hyväksyi kanteen osittain eli siten, että se velvoitti Blue Airin maksamaan kummallekin pääasian kantajalle 400 euroa korvaukseksi aineettomasta vahingosta mutta hylkäsi heidän esittämänsä muut vaatimukset.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Judecătoria Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "pääasian kantajalle"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Judecătoria Bacău)"->"hyväksyi kanteen osittain eli siten, että se velvoitti Blue Airin maksamaan kummallekin pääasian kantajalle 400 euroa korvaukseksi aineettomasta vahingosta mutta hylkäsi heidän esittämänsä muut vaatimukset.";
  "hyväksyi kanteen osittain eli siten, että se velvoitti Blue Airin maksamaan kummallekin pääasian kantajalle 400 euroa korvaukseksi aineettomasta vahingosta mutta hylkäsi heidän esittämänsä muut vaatimukset."->"Blue Air";
  "hyväksyi kanteen osittain eli siten, että se velvoitti Blue Airin maksamaan kummallekin pääasian kantajalle 400 euroa korvaukseksi aineettomasta vahingosta mutta hylkäsi heidän esittämänsä muut vaatimukset."->"pääasian kantajalle";
  "hyväksyi kanteen osittain eli siten, että se velvoitti Blue Airin maksamaan kummallekin pääasian kantajalle 400 euroa korvaukseksi aineettomasta vahingosta mutta hylkäsi heidän esittämänsä muut vaatimukset."->"EUR 400 as compensation for non-material damage."[dir=none];
  "hyväksyi kanteen osittain eli siten, että se velvoitti Blue Airin maksamaan kummallekin pääasian kantajalle 400 euroa korvaukseksi aineettomasta vahingosta mutta hylkäsi heidän esittämänsä muut vaatimukset."->"hylkäsi heidän esittämänsä muut vaatimukset.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Judecătoria Bacău (domstolen i första instans i Bacău) biföll delvis talan genom att Blue Air förpliktades att till var och en av klagandena betala 400 euro i skadestånd för den ideella skadan och genom att avslå övriga yrkanden.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (domstolen i första instans i Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "klagandena"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (domstolen i första instans i Bacău)"->"biföll delvis talan";
  "biföll delvis talan"->"Blue Air";
  "biföll delvis talan"->"klagandena";
  "biföll delvis talan"->"EUR 400 as compensation for non-material damage."[dir=none];
  "biföll delvis talan"->"avslå övriga yrkanden.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

Както ищците в главното производство, така и Blue Air подават въззивни жалби срещу решението на Judecătoria Bacău (Първоинстанционен съд Бакъу) до запитващата юрисдикция, която счита, че е необходимо да се изяснят някои аспекти във връзка с тълкуването на членове 4, 7, 8 и 12 от Регламент № 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):

digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "ищците"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"подават въззивни жалби";
  "подават въззивни жалби"->"The referring court";
  "ищците"->"подават въззивни жалби";
  "подават въззивни жалби"->"да се изяснят някои аспекти във връзка с тълкуването на членове 4, 7, 8 и 12 от Регламент № 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Tanto los demandantes del litigio principal como Blue Air interpusieron recurso de apelación contra la resolución de la Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunal de Primera Instancia de Bacău) ante el órgano jurisdiccional remitente, que estima necesario aclarar algunos aspectos relacionados con la interpretación de los artículos 4, 7, 8 y 12 del Reglamento n.o 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):

digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "los demandantes del litigio principal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"interpusieron recurso de apelación";
  "interpusieron recurso de apelación"->"The referring court";
  "los demandantes del litigio principal"->"interpusieron recurso de apelación";
  "interpusieron recurso de apelación"->"aclarar algunos aspectos relacionados con la interpretación de los artículos 4, 7, 8 y 12 del Reglamento n.o 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Žalobci v původním řízení i společnost Blue Air podali proti rozhodnutí Judecătoria Bacău (soud prvního stupně v Bacău) odvolání k předkládajícímu soudu, který považuje za nutné objasnit některé aspekty související s výkladem článků 4, 7, 8 a 12 nařízení č. 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (soud prvního stupně v Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Žalobci"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"podali proti rozhodnutí odvolání";
  "podali proti rozhodnutí odvolání"->"The referring court";
  "Žalobci"->"podali proti rozhodnutí odvolání";
  "podali proti rozhodnutí odvolání"->"Objasnit některé aspekty související s výkladem článků 4, 7, 8 a 12 nařízení č. 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Såvel sagsøgerne i hovedsagen som Blue Air iværksatte appel til prøvelse af den afgørelse, som Judecătoria Bacău (retten i første instans i Bacău) havde afsagt, ved den forelæggende ret, som er af den opfattelse, at der er behov for at afklare visse aspekter af fortolkningen af artikel 4, 7, 8 og 12 i forordning nr. 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (retten i første instans i Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sagsøgerne"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"iværksatte appel";
  "iværksatte appel"->"The referring court";
  "sagsøgerne"->"iværksatte appel";
  "iværksatte appel"->"at afklare visse aspekter af fortolkningen af artikel 4, 7, 8 og 12 i forordning nr. 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: German

Sowohl die Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens als auch Blue Air legten gegen die Entscheidung der Judecătoria Bacău (Amtsgericht Bacău) Berufung beim vorlegenden Gericht ein, das die Klarstellung einiger Aspekte im Zusammenhang mit der Auslegung der Art. 4, 7, 8 und 12 der Verordnung Nr. 261/2004 für erforderlich hält.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Amtsgericht Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "die Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"legten gegen die Entscheidung der Judecătoria Bacău (Amtsgericht Bacău) Berufung ein";
  "legten gegen die Entscheidung der Judecătoria Bacău (Amtsgericht Bacău) Berufung ein"->"The referring court";
  "die Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens"->"legten gegen die Entscheidung der Judecătoria Bacău (Amtsgericht Bacău) Berufung ein";
  "legten gegen die Entscheidung der Judecătoria Bacău (Amtsgericht Bacău) Berufung ein"->"die Klarstellung einiger Aspekte im Zusammenhang mit der Auslegung der Art. 4, 7, 8 und 12 der Verordnung Nr. 261/2004."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Nii põhikohtuasja apellandid kui ka Blue Air kaebasid Judecătoria Bacău (Bacău esimese astme kohus) otsuse edasi eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohtusse, kes pidas vajalikuks selgitada mõningaid määruse nr 261/2004 artiklite 4, 7, 8 ja 12 tõlgendamisega seotud aspekte.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Bacău esimese astme kohus)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "põhikohtuasja apellandid"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"kaebasid";
  "kaebasid"->"The referring court";
  "põhikohtuasja apellandid"->"kaebasid";
  "kaebasid"->"Selgitada mõningaid määruse nr 261/2004 artiklite 4, 7, 8 ja 12 tõlgendamisega seotud aspekte.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Τόσο οι ενάγοντες της κύριας δίκης όσο και η Blue Air άσκησαν έφεση κατά της αποφάσεως του Judecătoria Bacău (μονομελούς πρωτοδικείου Μπακάου) ενώπιον του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου, το οποίο κρίνει αναγκαίο να διευκρινιστούν ορισμένες πτυχές της ερμηνείας των άρθρων 4, 7, 8 και 12 του κανονισμού 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (πρωτοδικείου Μπακάου)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "οι ενάγοντες"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"άσκησαν έφεση";
  "άσκησαν έφεση"->"The referring court";
  "οι ενάγοντες"->"άσκησαν έφεση";
  "άσκησαν έφεση"->"να διευκρινιστούν ορισμένες πτυχές της ερμηνείας των άρθρων 4, 7, 8 και 12 του κανονισμού 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: French

Tant les requérants au principal que Blue Air ont formé un appel contre la décision de la Judecătoria Bacău (tribunal de première instance de Bacău) devant la juridiction de renvoi, qui estime nécessaire de clarifier certains aspects liés à l’interprétation des articles 4, 7, 8 et 12 du règlement no 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (tribunal de première instance de Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "les requérants"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"ont formé un appel";
  "ont formé un appel"->"The referring court";
  "les requérants"->"ont formé un appel";
  "ont formé un appel"->"de clarifier certains aspects liés à l’interprétation des articles 4, 7, 8 et 12 du règlement no 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Tužitelji u glavnom postupku i društvo Blue Air podnijeli su žalbu protiv odluke Judecătoria Bacău (Prvostupanjski sud u Bacăuu) sudu koji je uputio zahtjev koji smatra da je potrebno pojasniti određene aspekte u vezi s tumačenjem članaka 4., 7., 8. i 12. Uredbe br. 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Prvostupanjski sud u Bacăuu)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tužitelji"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"podnijeli su žalbu";
  "podnijeli su žalbu"->"The referring court";
  "Tužitelji"->"podnijeli su žalbu";
  "podnijeli su žalbu"->"pojasniti određene aspekte u vezi s tumačenjem članaka 4., 7., 8. i 12. Uredbe br. 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Tanto i ricorrenti nel procedimento principale quanto la Blue Air hanno presentato appello avverso la decisione della Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunale di primo grado di Bacău) presso il giudice del rinvio, che ritiene necessario chiarire determinati aspetti legati all’interpretazione degli articoli 4, 7, 8 e 12 del regolamento n. 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunale di primo grado di Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "i ricorrenti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"hanno presentato appello";
  "hanno presentato appello"->"The referring court";
  "i ricorrenti"->"hanno presentato appello";
  "hanno presentato appello"->"Chiarire determinati aspetti legati all’interpretazione degli articoli 4, 7, 8 e 12 del regolamento n. 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Gan prasītāji pamatlietā, gan Blue Air iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību par Judecătoria Bacău (Bakeu pirmās instances tiesa) nolēmumu iesniedzējtiesā, kas uzskatīja par nepieciešamu noskaidrot konkrētus aspektus saistībā ar Regulas Nr. 261/2004 4., 7., 8. un 12. panta interpretāciju.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Bakeu pirmās instances tiesa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "prasītāji"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību";
  "iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību"->"The referring court";
  "prasītāji"->"iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību";
  "iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību"->"noskaidrot konkrētus aspektus saistībā ar Regulas Nr. 261/2004 4., 7., 8. un 12. panta interpretāciju.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Tiek ieškovai pagrindinėje byloje, tiek „Blue Air“ apskundė Judecătoria Bacău (Bakeu apylinkės teismas) sprendimą prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikusiam teismui; šis mano, kad būtinas tam tikrų aspektų, susijusių su Reglamento Nr. 261/2004 4, 7, 8 ir 12 straipsniais, aiškinimas.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Bakeu apylinkės teismas)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ieškovai"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"apskundė";
  "apskundė"->"The referring court";
  "ieškovai"->"apskundė";
  "apskundė"->"tam tikrų aspektų, susijusių su Reglamento Nr. 261/2004 4, 7, 8 ir 12 straipsniais, aiškinimas.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Mind az alapeljárás felperesei, mind a Blue Air fellebbezést nyújtott be a Judecătoria Bacău (bákói helyi bíróság) határozatával szemben a kérdést előterjesztő bíróság előtt, amely szükségesnek tartja a 261/2004 rendelet 4., 7., 8. és 12. cikkének értelmezésével kapcsolatos egyes szempontok tisztázását.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Judecătoria Bacău (bákói helyi bíróság))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "az alapeljárás felperesei"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"fellebbezést nyújtott be";
  "fellebbezést nyújtott be"->"The referring court";
  "az alapeljárás felperesei"->"fellebbezést nyújtott be";
  "fellebbezést nyújtott be"->"a 261/2004 rendelet 4., 7., 8. és 12. cikkének értelmezésével kapcsolatos egyes szempontok tisztázását.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Kemm ir-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali kif ukoll Blue Air ippreżentaw appell kontra d-deċiżjoni tal-Judecătoria Bacău (il-Qorti tal-Ewwel Istanza ta’ Bacău) quddiem il-qorti tar-rinviju, li tqis li huwa neċessarju li jiġu kkjarifikati ċerti aspetti marbuta mal-interpretazzjoni tal-Artikoli 4, 7, 8 u 12 tar-Regolament Nru 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Qorti tal-Ewwel Istanza ta’ Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ir-rikorrenti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"ippreżentaw appell";
  "ippreżentaw appell"->"The referring court";
  "ir-rikorrenti"->"ippreżentaw appell";
  "ippreżentaw appell"->"jiġu kkjarifikati ċerti aspetti marbuta mal-interpretazzjoni tal-Artikoli 4, 7, 8 u 12 tar-Regolament Nru 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Zowel verzoekers in het hoofdgeding als Blue Air hebben beroep ingesteld tegen de beslissing van de Judecătorie Bacău bij de verwijzende rechter, die het noodzakelijk acht om enkele aspecten die verband houden met de uitlegging van de artikelen 4, 7, 8 en 12 van verordening nr. 261/2004 te verhelderen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Judecătorie Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "verzoekers in het hoofdgeding"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"beroep ingesteld";
  "beroep ingesteld"->"The referring court";
  "verzoekers in het hoofdgeding"->"beroep ingesteld";
  "beroep ingesteld"->"om enkele aspecten die verband houden met de uitlegging van de artikelen 4, 7, 8 en 12 van verordening nr. 261/2004 te verhelderen.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Zarówno powodowie w postępowaniu głównym, jak i Blue Air wnieśli apelację od tego wyroku Judecătoria Bacău (sądu pierwszej instancji w Bacău) do sądu odsyłającego, który uznał za konieczne wyjaśnienie niektórych aspektów związanych z wykładnią art. 4, 7, 8 i 12 rozporządzenia nr 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (sądu pierwszej instancji w Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "powodowie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"wnieśli apelację";
  "wnieśli apelację"->"The referring court";
  "powodowie"->"wnieśli apelację";
  "wnieśli apelację"->"Wyjaśnienie niektórych aspektów związanych z wykładnią art. 4, 7, 8 i 12 rozporządzenia nr 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Tanto os recorrentes no processo principal como a Blue Air interpuseram recurso da decisão do Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Bacău) perante o órgão jurisdicional de reenvio, que considera necessário esclarecer alguns aspetos relacionados com a interpretação dos artigos 4.o, 7.o, 8.o e 12.o do Regulamento n.o 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Tribunal de Primeira Instância de Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "os recorrentes no processo principal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"interpuseram recurso";
  "interpuseram recurso"->"The referring court";
  "os recorrentes no processo principal"->"interpuseram recurso";
  "interpuseram recurso"->"esclarecer alguns aspetos relacionados com a interpretação dos artigos 4.o, 7.o, 8.o e 12.o do Regulamento n.o 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Atât reclamanții din litigiul principal, cât și Blue Air au formulat apel împotriva deciziei Judecătoriei Bacău în fața instanței de trimitere, care consideră necesară clarificarea anumitor aspecte legate de interpretarea articolelor 4, 7, 8 și 12 din Regulamentul nr. 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Judecătoriei Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "reclamanții"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"au formulat apel";
  "au formulat apel"->"The referring court";
  "reclamanții"->"au formulat apel";
  "au formulat apel"->"clarificarea anumitor aspecte legate de interpretarea articolelor 4, 7, 8 și 12 din Regulamentul nr. 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Tak žalobcovia vo veci samej, ako aj Blue Air podali proti rozhodnutiu Judecătoria Bacău (Súd prvého stupňa Bacău) odvolanie na vnútroštátny súd, ktorý podal návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania a ktorý považuje za potrebné objasniť niektoré aspekty súvisiace s výkladom článkov 4, 7, 8 a 12 nariadenia č. 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Súd prvého stupňa Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "žalobcovia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"podali proti rozhodnutiu odvolanie";
  "podali proti rozhodnutiu odvolanie"->"The referring court";
  "žalobcovia"->"podali proti rozhodnutiu odvolanie";
  "podali proti rozhodnutiu odvolanie"->"objasniť niektoré aspekty súvisiace s výkladom článkov 4, 7, 8 a 12 nariadenia č. 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Zoper sodbo Judecătoria Bacău (prvostopenjsko sodišče v Bacăuu) so tako tožeči stranki iz postopka v glavni stvari kot tudi družba Blue Air vložile pritožbo na predložitveno sodišče, ki meni, da je treba razjasniti nekatere vidike v zvezi z razlago členov 4, 7, 8 in 12 Uredbe št. 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Judecătoria Bacău (prvostopenjsko sodišče v Bacăuu))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "tožeči stranki"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"vložile pritožbo";
  "vložile pritožbo"->"The referring court";
  "tožeči stranki"->"vložile pritožbo";
  "vložile pritožbo"->"Da je treba razjasniti nekatere vidike v zvezi z razlago členov 4, 7, 8 in 12 Uredbe št. 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Sekä pääasian kantajat että Blue Air valittivat Judecătoria Bacăun ratkaisusta ennakkoratkaisua pyytäneeseen tuomioistuimeen, joka pitää tarpeellisena selventää tiettyjä asetuksen N:o 261/2004 4, 7, 8 ja 12 artiklan tulkintaan liittyviä näkökohtia.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (Judecătoria Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "pääasian kantajat"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"valittivat";
  "valittivat"->"The referring court";
  "pääasian kantajat"->"valittivat";
  "valittivat"->"Selventää tiettyjä asetuksen N:o 261/2004 4, 7, 8 ja 12 artiklan tulkintaan liittyviä näkökohtia.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.
Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.
Case C-354/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Såväl klagandena i det nationella målet som Blue Air överklagade beslutet av Judecătoria Bacău (domstolen i första instans i Bacău) till den hänskjutande domstolen, som anser det nödvändigt att klargöra vissa frågor avseende tolkningen av artiklarna 4, 7, 8 och 12 i förordning nr 261/2004.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Judecătoria Bacău (domstolen i första instans i Bacău)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "klagandena"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Blue Air"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    

  "Blue Air"->"överklagade beslutet";
  "överklagade beslutet"->"The referring court";
  "klagandena"->"överklagade beslutet";
  "överklagade beslutet"->"att klargöra vissa frågor avseende tolkningen av artiklarna 4, 7, 8 och 12 i förordning nr 261/2004.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

Жалбоподателят в главното производство управлява млекопроизводително стопанство. През периода от 1 април 2000 г. до 31 март 2001 г. той превишава индивидуалното референтно количество, с което разполага.
С решение от 26 юли 2001 г., озаглавено „Режим на млечните квоти — Национално изравняване, период 2000/2001“, AGEA уведомява производителите за свръхколичествата им и за резултата от изравнителните мерки. Съгласно това решение неизползваните индивидуални референтни количества се преразпределят по предвиден в приложимото законодателство критерий за приоритет по категории. Жалбоподателят в главното производство не е сред лицата с право на преразпределение.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "AGEA"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Жалбоподателят"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "С решение от 26 юли 2001 г. 26/07/2001"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "AGEA"->"уведомява производителите за свръхколичествата им и за резултата от изравнителните мерки..";
  "уведомява производителите за свръхколичествата им и за резултата от изравнителните мерки.."->"С решение от 26 юли 2001 г. 26/07/2001"[dir=none];
  "С решение от 26 юли 2001 г. 26/07/2001"->"„Режим на млечните квоти — Национално изравняване, период 2000/2001“"[dir=none];
  "уведомява производителите за свръхколичествата им и за резултата от изравнителните мерки.."->"Жалбоподателят";
  "Жалбоподателят"->"той превишава индивидуалното референтно количество 01/04/2000 - 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
   
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

La recurrente en el litigio principal gestiona una empresa agrícola productora de leche. Durante el período comprendido entre el 1 de abril de 2000 y el 31 de marzo de 2001, sobrepasó la cantidad de referencia individual de la que disponía.
Mediante resolución de 26 de julio de 2001, titulada «Régimen de cuotas lácteas — Distribución nacional, período 2000/2001», la AGEA comunicó a los productores sus excedentes de producción y el resultado de las operaciones de distribución. En virtud de dicha resolución, las cantidades de referencia individuales no utilizadas fueron reasignadas según un criterio de prioridad por categorías, previsto por la normativa aplicable. La recurrente en el litigio principal no figuraba entre los beneficiarios de dichas reasignaciones.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "AGEA"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "La recurrente en el litigio principal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "resolución de 26 de julio de 2001 26/07/2001"[shape=trapezium];
    

  "AGEA"->"comunicó a los productores sus excedentes de producción y el resultado de las operaciones de distribución..";
  "comunicó a los productores sus excedentes de producción y el resultado de las operaciones de distribución.."->"resolución de 26 de julio de 2001 26/07/2001"[dir=none];
  "resolución de 26 de julio de 2001 26/07/2001"->"Régimen de cuotas lácteas — Distribución nacional, período 2000/2001"[dir=none];
  "comunicó a los productores sus excedentes de producción y el resultado de las operaciones de distribución.."->"La recurrente en el litigio principal";
  "La recurrente en el litigio principal"->"sobrepasó la cantidad de referencia individual de la que disponía. 01/04/2000 - 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
   
}