mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Bulgarian

Ищец в главното производство е майката на детето (наричана по-нататък „майката“), която е гражданин на Бангладеш и през 2013 г. сключва в Бангладеш брак с ответника в главното производство и баща на детето (наричан по-нататък „бащата“), който е британски гражданин.
През юни или юли 2016 г. майката се установява в Обединеното кралство, за да живее там с бащата. Издадена ѝ е виза като чуждестранен съпруг от United Kingdom Home Office (Министерство на вътрешните работи на Обединеното кралство) с валидност от 1 юли 2016 г. до 1 април 2019 г.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Ищец"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "бащата"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "детето"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Ищец"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"бащата"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"детето"[dir=none];
  "Ищец"->"гражданин на Бангладеш"[dir=none];
  "бащата"->"британски гражданин"[dir=none];
  "Ищец"->"През юни или юли 2016 г. майката се установява в Обединеното кралство, за да живее там с бащата. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Ищец"->"виза като чуждестранен съпруг от United Kingdom Home Office (Министерство на вътрешните работи на Обединеното кралство) с валидност от 1 юли 2016 г. до 1 април 2019 г. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Spanish

La demandante en el litigio principal, madre de la menor (en lo sucesivo, «madre»), es nacional de Bangladés, y contrajo matrimonio en 2013, en ese mismo país, con el demandado en el litigio principal, de nacionalidad británica, padre de la menor (en lo sucesivo, «padre»).
En junio o julio de 2016 la madre se estableció en el Reino Unido con el fin de residir en dicho Estado miembro con el padre. Obtuvo un visado para cónyuge extranjero expedido por el United Kingdom Home Office (Ministerio del Interior del Reino Unido), válido desde el 1 de julio de 2016 hasta el 1 de abril de 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "La demandante"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "padre"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la menor"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "La demandante"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"padre"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"la menor"[dir=none];
  "La demandante"->"nacional de Bangladés"[dir=none];
  "padre"->"de nacionalidad británica"[dir=none];
  "La demandante"->"En junio o julio de 2016 la madre se estableció en el Reino Unido con el fin de residir en dicho Estado miembro con el padre. 2016"[dir=none];
  "La demandante"->"un visado para cónyuge extranjero expedido por el United Kingdom Home Office (Ministerio del Interior del Reino Unido), válido desde el 1 de julio de 2016 hasta el 1 de abril de 2019. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Czech

Žalobkyně v původním řízení, matka dítěte (dále jen „matka“), je bangladéšská státní příslušnice, která v roce 2013 uzavřela v Bangladéši manželství s žalovaným v původním řízení, britským státním příslušníkem, který je otcem dítěte (dále jen „otec“).
V červnu nebo červenci 2016 matka přicestovala do Spojeného království, aby tam žila společně s otcem svého budoucího dítěte. United Kingdom Home Office (Ministerstvo vnitra Spojeného království) jí udělilo manželské vízum pro občanku třetí země, platné od 1. července 2016 do 1. dubna 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Žalobkyně"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "otec"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dítěte"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Žalobkyně"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"otec"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"dítěte"[dir=none];
  "Žalobkyně"->"bangladéšská státní příslušnice"[dir=none];
  "otec"->"britským státním příslušníkem"[dir=none];
  "Žalobkyně"->"V červnu nebo červenci 2016 matka přicestovala do Spojeného království, aby tam žila společně s otcem svého budoucího dítěte. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Žalobkyně"->"manželské vízum pro občanku třetí země, platné od 1. července 2016 do 1. dubna 2019. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Danish

Sagsøgeren i hovedsagen, der er mor til barnet (herefter »moderen«), er en bangladeshisk statsborger, som indgik et ægteskab i Bangladesh i 2013 med sagsøgte i hovedsagen, der er britisk statsborger og far til barnet (herefter »faderen«).
I juni eller juli 2016 indrejste moderen i Det Forenede Kongerige for at bo dér med faderen. Hun fik udstedt et visum som udenlandsk ægtefælle af United Kingdom Home Office (Det Forenede Kongeriges indenrigsministerium), som er gyldigt fra den 1. juli 2016 til den 1. april 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Sagsøgeren i hovedsagen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "faderen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "barnet"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Sagsøgeren i hovedsagen"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"faderen"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"barnet"[dir=none];
  "Sagsøgeren i hovedsagen"->"bangladeshisk statsborger"[dir=none];
  "faderen"->"britisk statsborger"[dir=none];
  "Sagsøgeren i hovedsagen"->"I juni eller juli 2016 indrejste moderen i Det Forenede Kongerige for at bo dér med faderen. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Sagsøgeren i hovedsagen"->"et visum som udenlandsk ægtefælle af United Kingdom Home Office (Det Forenede Kongeriges indenrigsministerium), som er gyldigt fra den 1. juli 2016 til den 1. april 2019. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: German

Die Klägerin des Ausgangsverfahrens, die Mutter des Kindes (im Folgenden: Mutter), ist eine bangladeschische Staatsangehörige, die im Jahr 2013 mit dem Beklagten des Ausgangsverfahrens, einem britischen Staatsangehörigen, der der Vater des Kindes ist (im Folgenden: Vater), eine Ehe geschlossen hat.
Im Juni oder Juli 2016 ließ sich die Mutter im Vereinigten Königreich nieder, um dort mit dem Vater zu leben. Ihr wurde vom United Kingdom Home Office (Innenministerium des Vereinigten Königreichs) ein Ehegattenvisum mit einer Gültigkeitsdauer vom 1. Juli 2016 bis 1. April 2019 erteilt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Die Klägerin des Ausgangsverfahrens"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "der Vater"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kindes"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Die Klägerin des Ausgangsverfahrens"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"der Vater"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"Kindes"[dir=none];
  "Die Klägerin des Ausgangsverfahrens"->"bangladeschische Staatsangehörige"[dir=none];
  "der Vater"->"britischen Staatsangehörigen"[dir=none];
  "Die Klägerin des Ausgangsverfahrens"->"Im Juni oder Juli 2016 ließ sich die Mutter im Vereinigten Königreich nieder, um dort mit dem Vater zu leben. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Die Klägerin des Ausgangsverfahrens"->"Ehegattenvisum vom United Kingdom Home Office (Innenministerium des Vereinigten Königreichs) mit einer Gültigkeitsdauer vom 1. Juli 2016 bis 1. April 2019 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Estonian

Põhikohtuasja hageja, kes on lapse ema (edaspidi „ema“), on Bangladeshi kodanik, kes sõlmis 2013. aastal Bangladeshis abielu põhikohtuasja kostjaga, kes on Briti kodanik ja lapse isa (edaspidi „isa“).
2016. aasta juunis või juulis sõitis ema Ühendkuningriiki, et seal isaga koos elada. Ema sai United Kingdom Home Office’ilt (Ühendkuningriigi siseministeerium) välismaalasest abikaasa viisa kehtivusega 1. juuli 2016 kuni 1. aprill 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Põhikohtuasja hageja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "isa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "lapse"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Põhikohtuasja hageja"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"isa"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"lapse"[dir=none];
  "Põhikohtuasja hageja"->"Bangladeshi kodanik"[dir=none];
  "isa"->"Briti kodanik"[dir=none];
  "Põhikohtuasja hageja"->"2016. aasta juunis või juulis sõitis ema Ühendkuningriiki, et seal isaga koos elada. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Põhikohtuasja hageja"->"United Kingdom Home Office’ilt (Ühendkuningriigi siseministeerium) välismaalasest abikaasa viisa kehtivusega 1. juuli 2016 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Greek

Η ενάγουσα της κύριας δίκης, μητέρα του παιδιού (στο εξής: μητέρα), είναι υπήκοος Μπανγκλαντές και το 2013 συνήψε στο Μπανγκλαντές γάμο με τον εναγόμενο της κύριας δίκης, βρετανικής ιθαγενείας, ο οποίος είναι ο πατέρας του παιδιού (στο εξής: πατέρας).        
Τον Ιούνιο ή τον Ιούλιο του 2016, η μητέρα εγκαταστάθηκε στο Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο προκειμένου να ζήσει εκεί μαζί με τον πατέρα. Το United Kingdom Home Office (Υπουργείο Εσωτερικών του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου) της χορήγησε θεώρηση αλλοδαπού συζύγου με ισχύ από την 1η Ιουλίου 2016 έως την 1η Απριλίου 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Η ενάγουσα της κύριας δίκης"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ο πατέρας"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "παιδιού"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Η ενάγουσα της κύριας δίκης"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"ο πατέρας"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"παιδιού"[dir=none];
  "Η ενάγουσα της κύριας δίκης"->"υπήκοος Μπανγκλαντές"[dir=none];
  "ο πατέρας"->"βρετανικής ιθαγενείας"[dir=none];
  "Η ενάγουσα της κύριας δίκης"->"Τον Ιούνιο ή τον Ιούλιο του 2016, η μητέρα εγκαταστάθηκε στο Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο προκειμένου να ζήσει εκεί μαζί με τον πατέρα. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Η ενάγουσα της κύριας δίκης"->"θεώρηση αλλοδαπού συζύγου από το United Kingdom Home Office (Υπουργείο Εσωτερικών του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου) με ισχύ από την 1η Ιουλίου 2016 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: French

La requérante au principal, mère de l’enfant (ci-après la « mère »), est une ressortissante bangladaise qui a contracté un mariage en 2013, au Bangladesh, avec le défendeur au principal, de nationalité britannique, qui est le père de l’enfant (ci-après le « père »).
Au mois de juin ou au mois de juillet 2016, la mère s’est établie au Royaume-Uni pour y vivre avec le père. Elle a bénéficié d’un visa pour conjoint étranger délivré par l’United Kingdom Home Office (ministère de l’Intérieur du Royaume-Uni), valable du 1er juillet 2016 au 1er avril 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "La requérante"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "le père"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l’enfant"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "La requérante"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"le père"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"l’enfant"[dir=none];
  "La requérante"->"ressortissante bangladaise"[dir=none];
  "le père"->"de nationalité britannique"[dir=none];
  "La requérante"->"Au mois de juin ou au mois de juillet 2016, la mère s’est établie au Royaume-Uni pour y vivre avec le père. 2016"[dir=none];
  "La requérante"->"un visa pour conjoint étranger délivré par l’United Kingdom Home Office (ministère de l’Intérieur du Royaume-Uni), valable du 1er juillet 2016 au 1er avril 2019 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Croatian

Tužiteljica u glavnom postupku, majka djeteta (u daljnjem tekstu: majka), bangladeška je državljanka koja je 2013. sklopila brak u Bangladešu s tuženikom u glavnom postupku, britanskim državljaninom koji je otac djeteta (u daljnjem tekstu: otac).
U lipnju ili srpnju 2016. majka se nastanila u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini kako bi tamo živjela s ocem. United Kingdom Home Office (Ministarstvo unutarnjih poslova Ujedinjene Kraljevine) izdao joj je vizu za inozemnog bračnog druga koja vrijedi od 1. srpnja 2016. do 1. travnja 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tužiteljica"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "otac"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "djeteta"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Tužiteljica"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"otac"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"djeteta"[dir=none];
  "Tužiteljica"->"bangladeška je državljanka"[dir=none];
  "otac"->"britanskim državljaninom"[dir=none];
  "Tužiteljica"->"U lipnju ili srpnju 2016. majka se nastanila u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini kako bi tamo živjela s ocem. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Tužiteljica"->"Vizu za inozemnog bračnog druga koja vrijedi od 1. srpnja 2016. do 1. travnja 2019. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Italian

La ricorrente nel procedimento principale, madre della minore (in prosieguo: la «madre»), è una cittadina bengalese che nel 2013 si è unita in matrimonio, in Bangladesh, con il convenuto nel procedimento principale, cittadino britannico, che è il padre della minore (in prosieguo: il «padre»).
Nel mese di giugno o di luglio 2016, la madre si è stabilita nel Regno Unito per viverci con il padre. Essa ha beneficiato di un visto per coniuge straniero rilasciato dall’United Kingdom Home Office (Ministero dell’Interno del Regno Unito), valido dal 1o luglio 2016 al 1o aprile 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "La ricorrente"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "il «padre»"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la minore"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "La ricorrente"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"il «padre»"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"la minore"[dir=none];
  "La ricorrente"->"una cittadina bengalese"[dir=none];
  "il «padre»"->"cittadino britannico"[dir=none];
  "La ricorrente"->"Nel mese di giugno o di luglio 2016, la madre si è stabilita nel Regno Unito per viverci con il padre. 2016"[dir=none];
  "La ricorrente"->"visto per coniuge straniero rilasciato dall’United Kingdom Home Office valido dal 1o luglio 2016 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Latvian

Prasītāja pamatlietā, bērna māte (turpmāk tekstā – “māte”), ir Bangladešas pilsone, kura 2013. gadā Bangladešā ir stājusies laulībā ar atbildētāju pamatlietā – Apvienotās Karalistes pilsoni, kurš ir bērna tēvs (turpmāk tekstā – “tēvs”).
2016. gada jūnijā vai jūlijā māte ir ieradusies un iekārtojusies uz dzīvi Apvienotajā Karalistē, lai dzīvotu kopā ar tēvu. United Kingdom Home Office (Apvienotās Karalistes Iekšlietu ministrija) viņai izsniedza ārvalstu laulātā vīzu, kas ir spēkā no 2016. gada 1. jūlijam līdz 2019. gada 1. aprīlim.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Prasītāja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "bērna tēvs"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "bērna"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Prasītāja"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"bērna tēvs"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"bērna"[dir=none];
  "Prasītāja"->"Bangladešas pilsone"[dir=none];
  "bērna tēvs"->"Apvienotās Karalistes pilsoni"[dir=none];
  "Prasītāja"->"2016. gada jūnijā vai jūlijā māte ir ieradusies un iekārtojusies uz dzīvi Apvienotajā Karalistē, lai dzīvotu kopā ar tēvu. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Prasītāja"->"ārvalstu laulātā vīzu, kas ir spēkā no 2016. gada 1. jūlijam līdz 2019. gada 1. aprīlim. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Lithuanian

Ieškovė pagrindinėje byloje, vaiko motina (toliau – motina), yra Bangladešo pilietė, ji 2013 m. Bangladeše susituokė su atsakovu pagrindinėje byloje, Didžiosios Britanijos piliečiu, kuris yra vaiko tėvas (toliau – tėvas).
2016 m. birželio ar liepos mėnesį motina atvyko į Jungtinę Karalystę gyventi su tėvu. Jungtinės Karalystės Home Office (Jungtinės Karalystės vidaus reikalų ministerija) jai išdavė sutuoktinės vizą, galiojančią nuo 2016 m. liepos 1 d. iki 2019 m. balandžio 1 d.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Ieškovė"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "tėvas"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "vaiko"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Ieškovė"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"tėvas"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"vaiko"[dir=none];
  "Ieškovė"->"Bangladešo pilietė"[dir=none];
  "tėvas"->"Didžiosios Britanijos pilietis"[dir=none];
  "Ieškovė"->"2016 m. birželio ar liepos mėnesį motina atvyko į Jungtinę Karalystę gyventi su tėvu. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Ieškovė"->"Sutuoktinės vizą, galiojančią nuo 2016 m. liepos 1 d. iki 2019 m. balandžio 1 d. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Hungarian

Az alapeljárás felperese, a gyermek édesanyja (a továbbiakban: anya) bangladesi állampolgár, aki 2013‑ban Bangladesben házasságra lépett az alapeljárás alperesével, aki brit állampolgár és a gyermek édesapja (a továbbiakban: apa).
2016 júniusában vagy júliusában az anya az Egyesült Királyságban telepedett le, hogy ott az apával éljen. Az anyának a United Kingdom Home Office (az Egyesült Királyság belügyminisztériuma) külföldi házastársnak szóló vízumot állított ki, amely 2016. július 1‑jétől 2019. április 1‑jéig érvényes.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Az alapeljárás felperese"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "a gyermek édesapja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "gyermek"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Az alapeljárás felperese"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"a gyermek édesapja"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"gyermek"[dir=none];
  "Az alapeljárás felperese"->"bangladesi állampolgár"[dir=none];
  "a gyermek édesapja"->"brit állampolgár"[dir=none];
  "Az alapeljárás felperese"->"2016 júniusában vagy júliusában az anya az Egyesült Királyságban telepedett le, hogy ott az apával éljen. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Az alapeljárás felperese"->"United Kingdom Home Office (az Egyesült Királyság belügyminisztériuma) külföldi házastársnak szóló vízumot állított ki, amely 2016. július 1‑jétől 2019. április 1‑jéig érvényes. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Maltese

Ir-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali, l-omm tal-wild (iktar ‘il quddiem l- “omm”), hija ċittadina tal-Bangladexx li żżewġet fl-2013, fil-Bangladexx, mal-konvenut fil-kawża prinċipali, ta’ nazzjonalità Brittanika, li huwa missier il-wild (iktar ‘il quddiem il-“missier”).
Fix-xahar ta’ Ġunju jew fix-xahar ta’ Lulju 2016, l-omm stabbilixxiet ruħha fir-Renju Unit biex tgħix hemmhekk mal-missier. Hija bbenefikat minn viża għal konjuġi barrani maħruġ mill-United Kingdom Home Office (il-Ministeru tal-Intern tar-Renju Unit), validu mill-1 ta’ Lulju 2016 sal-1 ta’ April 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Ir-rikorrenti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "huwa missier"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "wild"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Ir-rikorrenti"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"huwa missier"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"wild"[dir=none];
  "Ir-rikorrenti"->"ċittadina tal-Bangladexx"[dir=none];
  "huwa missier"->"nazzjonalità Brittanika"[dir=none];
  "Ir-rikorrenti"->"Fix-xahar ta’ Ġunju jew fix-xahar ta’ Lulju 2016, l-omm stabbilixxiet ruħha fir-Renju Unit biex tgħix hemmhekk mal-missier. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Ir-rikorrenti"->"viża għal konjuġi barrani maħruġ mill-United Kingdom Home Office (il-Ministeru tal-Intern tar-Renju Unit), validu mill-1 ta’ Lulju 2016 sal-1 ta’ April 2019. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Dutch

Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding, de moeder van het kind (hierna: „de moeder”), is staatsburger van Bangladesh en is in 2013 in Bangladesh gehuwd met verweerder in het hoofdgeding, die de Britse nationaliteit heeft en de vader van het kind is (hierna: „de vader”).
In juni of juli 2016 heeft de moeder zich in het Verenigd Koninkrijk gevestigd om daar bij de vader te wonen. Haar werd een visum voor buitenlandse echtgenoten verleend door de United Kingdom Home Office (ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken van het Verenigd Koninkrijk), dat geldig was van 1 juli 2016 tot 1 april 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de vader"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "het kind"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"de vader"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"het kind"[dir=none];
  "Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding"->"staatsburger van Bangladesh"[dir=none];
  "de vader"->"die de Britse nationaliteit heeft"[dir=none];
  "Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding"->"In juni of juli 2016 heeft de moeder zich in het Verenigd Koninkrijk gevestigd om daar bij de vader te wonen. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding"->"een visum voor buitenlandse echtgenoten verleend door de United Kingdom Home Office (ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken van het Verenigd Koninkrijk), dat geldig was van 1 juli 2016 tot 1 april 2019. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Polish

Powódka w postępowaniu głównym, matka dziecka (zwana dalej „matką”), jest obywatelką Bangladeszu, która w 2013 r. zawarła związek małżeński w Bangladeszu z pozwanym w postępowaniu głównym, obywatelem Zjednoczonego Królestwa, który jest ojcem dziecka (zwany dalej „ojcem”).
W czerwcu lub w lipcu 2016 r. matka przyjechała do Zjednoczonego Królestwa, aby zamieszkać tam z ojcem. Posiadała wizę dla małżonka będącego cudzoziemcem wydaną przez United Kingdom Home Office (ministerstwo spraw wewnętrznych Zjednoczonego Królestwa), ważną od dnia 1 lipca 2016 r. do dnia 1 kwietnia 2019 r.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Powódka"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ojcem"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dziecka"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Powódka"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"ojcem"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"dziecka"[dir=none];
  "Powódka"->"obywatelką Bangladeszu"[dir=none];
  "ojcem"->"obywatelem Zjednoczonego Królestwa"[dir=none];
  "Powódka"->"W czerwcu lub w lipcu 2016 r. matka przyjechała do Zjednoczonego Królestwa, aby zamieszkać tam z ojcem. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Powódka"->"wizę dla małżonka będącego cudzoziemcem wydaną przez United Kingdom Home Office (ministerstwo spraw wewnętrznych Zjednoczonego Królestwa), ważną od dnia 1 lipca 2016 r. do dnia 1 kwietnia 2019 r. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Portuguese

A recorrente no processo principal, mãe da criança (a seguir «mãe»), é uma nacional do Bangladesh que contraiu casamento em 2013, no Bangladesh, com o recorrido no processo principal, de nacionalidade britânica, que é o pai da criança (a seguir «pai»).
No mês de junho ou no mês de julho de 2016, a mãe estabeleceu‑se no Reino Unido para aí viver com o pai. Obteve um visto para cônjuge estrangeiro emitido pelo United Kingdom Home Office (Ministério do Interior do Reino Unido), válido entre 1 de julho de 2016 e 1 de abril de 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "A recorrente"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "o pai"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "criança"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "A recorrente"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"o pai"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"criança"[dir=none];
  "A recorrente"->"nacional do Bangladesh"[dir=none];
  "o pai"->"de nacionalidade britânica"[dir=none];
  "A recorrente"->"No mês de junho ou no mês de julho de 2016, a mãe estabeleceu‑se no Reino Unido para aí viver com o pai. 2016"[dir=none];
  "A recorrente"->"um visto para cônjuge estrangeiro emitido pelo United Kingdom Home Office (Ministério do Interior do Reino Unido), válido entre 1 de julho de 2016 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Romanian

Reclamanta din litigiul principal, mama copilului (denumită în continuare „mama”), este un resortisant din Bangladesh care a încheiat o căsătorie în 2013, în Bangladesh, cu pârâtul din litigiul principal, de naționalitate britanică, care este tatăl copilului (denumit în continuare „tatăl”).
În luna iunie sau în luna iulie 2016, mama s‑a stabilit în Regatul Unit, pentru a trăi pe acest teritoriu alături de tată. Aceasta a beneficiat de o viză pentru soț străin acordată de United Kingdom Home Office (Ministerul de Interne al Regatului Unit), valabilă de la 1 iulie 2016 la 1 aprilie 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Reclamanta"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "tatăl"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "copilului"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Reclamanta"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"tatăl"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"copilului"[dir=none];
  "Reclamanta"->"resortisant din Bangladesh"[dir=none];
  "tatăl"->"de naționalitate britanică"[dir=none];
  "Reclamanta"->"În luna iunie sau în luna iulie 2016, mama s‑a stabilit în Regatul Unit, pentru a trăi pe acest teritoriu alături de tată. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Reclamanta"->"o viză pentru soț străin acordată de United Kingdom Home Office (Ministerul de Interne al Regatului Unit), valabilă de la 1 iulie 2016 la 1 aprilie 2019. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Slovak

Žalobkyňa v konaní vo veci samej, matka dieťaťa (ďalej len „matka“), je bangladéšskou štátnou príslušníčkou, ktorá uzatvorila v roku 2013 v Bangladéši manželstvo so žalovaným vo veci samej, britským štátnym príslušníkom, ktorý je otcom dieťaťa (ďalej len „otec“).
V júni alebo júli 2016 sa matka usadila v Spojenom kráľovstve, aby tam žila s otcom. Využila víza určené manželskému partnerovi z cudziny udelené United Kingdom Home Office (Ministerstvo vnútra Spojeného kráľovstva) platné od 1. júla 2016 do 1. apríla 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Žalobkyňa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "otec"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dieťaťa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Žalobkyňa"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"otec"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"dieťaťa"[dir=none];
  "Žalobkyňa"->"bangladéšskou štátnou príslušníčkou"[dir=none];
  "otec"->"britským štátnym príslušníkom"[dir=none];
  "Žalobkyňa"->"V júni alebo júli 2016 sa matka usadila v Spojenom kráľovstve, aby tam žila s otcom. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Žalobkyňa"->"víza určené manželskému partnerovi z cudziny udelené United Kingdom Home Office (Ministerstvo vnútra Spojeného kráľovstva) platné od 1. júla 2016 do 1. apríla 2019. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Slovenian

Tožeča stranka v postopku v glavni stvari, mati deklice (v nadaljevanju: mati), je državljanka Bangladeša, ki je leta 2013 v Bangladešu sklenila zakonsko zvezo s toženo stranko v postopku v glavni stvari, ki ima britansko državljanstvo in je oče deklice (v nadaljevanju: oče).
Mati se je junija oziroma julija 2016 preselila v Združeno kraljestvo, da bi živela z očetom. United Kingdom Home Office (ministrstvo za notranje zadeve Združenega kraljestva) ji je odobrilo vizum za tujega zakonca z veljavnostjo od 1. julija 2016 do 1. aprila 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tožeča stranka"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "oče"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "deklice"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Tožeča stranka"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"oče"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"deklice"[dir=none];
  "Tožeča stranka"->"državljanka Bangladeša"[dir=none];
  "oče"->"britansko državljanstvo"[dir=none];
  "Tožeča stranka"->"Mati se je junija oziroma julija 2016 preselila v Združeno kraljestvo, da bi živela z očetom. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Tožeča stranka"->"vizum za tujega zakonca z veljavnostjo od 1. julija 2016 do 1. aprila 2019. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Finnish

Pääasian kantaja, lapsen äiti (jäljempänä äiti), on Bangladeshin kansalainen, joka meni Bangladeshissa vuonna 2013 naimisiin pääasian vastaajan kanssa, joka on Ison-Britannian kansalainen ja lapsen isä (jäljempänä isä).
Vuoden 2016 kesä-heinäkuussa äiti saapui Yhdistyneeseen kuningaskuntaan asuakseen siellä isän kanssa. Äidillä oli United Kingdom Home Officen (Yhdistyneen kuningaskunnan sisäasiainministeriö) myöntämä ulkomaalaisen puolison viisumi, jonka voimassaoloaika oli 1.7.2016–1.4.2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Pääasian kantaja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "isä"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "lapsen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Pääasian kantaja"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"isä"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"lapsen"[dir=none];
  "Pääasian kantaja"->"Bangladeshin kansalainen"[dir=none];
  "isä"->"Ison-Britannian kansalainen"[dir=none];
  "Pääasian kantaja"->"Vuoden 2016 kesä-heinäkuussa äiti saapui Yhdistyneeseen kuningaskuntaan asuakseen siellä isän kanssa. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Pääasian kantaja"->"United Kingdom Home Officen (Yhdistyneen kuningaskunnan sisäasiainministeriö) myöntämä ulkomaalaisen puolison viisumi, jonka voimassaoloaika oli 1.7.2016–1.4.2019. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Swedish

Klaganden i det nationella målet, barnets mor (nedan kallad modern), är en bangladeshisk medborgare som år 2013 ingick äktenskap i Bangladesh med motparten i det nationella målet som är far till barnet och har brittiskt medborgarskap (nedan kallad fadern).
I juni eller juli månad 2016 flyttade modern till Förenade kungariket för att leva där tillsammans med fadern. Hon beviljades i egenskap av utländsk maka en visering av United Kingdom Home Office (Förenade kungarikets inrikesministerium) som var giltig från den 1 juli 2016 till den 1 april 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Klaganden"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "fadern"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "barnet"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Klaganden"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"fadern"[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"barnet"[dir=none];
  "Klaganden"->"bangladeshisk medborgare"[dir=none];
  "fadern"->"har brittiskt medborgarskap"[dir=none];
  "Klaganden"->"I juni eller juli månad 2016 flyttade modern till Förenade kungariket för att leva där tillsammans med fadern. 2016"[dir=none];
  "Klaganden"->"visering av United Kingdom Home Office (Förenade kungarikets inrikesministerium) som var giltig från den 1 juli 2016 till den 1 april 2019. 01/04/2019"[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: English

On 20 March 2018, the mother commenced proceedings in the referring court for an order that the child be made a ward of that court and an order that the mother and the child return to the United Kingdom in order to participate in the proceedings before that court. The mother submits that the referring court has jurisdiction to determine the dispute in the main proceedings. In that regard the mother claims, in particular, that, on the date she brought the matter before the referring court, the child was habitually resident in the United Kingdom. For his part, the father contests the jurisdiction of that court to make any decision with regard to the child.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The applicant"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The father"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The referring court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "The applicant"->"The father"[dir=none style=bold];
   "The applicant"->"Commenced proceedings 20/03/2018";
   "Commenced proceedings 20/03/2018"->"The referring court";
   "The father"->"The referring court"[label="Contests the jurisdiction of that court to make any decision with regard to the child"];
   "Commenced proceedings 20/03/2018"->"For an order that the child be made a ward of that court and an order that the mother and the child return to the United Kingdom"[dir=none];
   "Commenced proceedings 20/03/2018"->"The child was habitually resident in the United Kingdom"[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2018.
UD v XB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 8(1) — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Concept of ‘habitual residence of the child’ — Requirement of physical presence — Detention of the mother and child in a third country against the will of the mother — Infringement of the fundamental rights of the mother and child.
Case C-393/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Bulgarian

На 20 март 2018 г. майката предявява иск пред запитващата юрисдикция с цел детето да бъде поставено под закрилата на тази юрисдикция и да бъде разпоредено тя и детето да се върнат в Обединеното кралство, за да участват в производството пред същата юрисдикция. Майката твърди, че тази юрисдикция е компетентна да разреши спора в главното производство. В това отношение майката по-специално твърди, че към датата, на която е сезирала запитващата юрисдикция, обичайното местопребиваване на детето е било в Обединеното кралство. От своя страна бащата оспорва компетентността на запитващата юрисдикция да постановява каквито и да било решения относно детето.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "запитващата юрисдикция"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "бащата"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "запитващата юрисдикция"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "запитващата юрисдикция"->"бащата"[dir=none style=bold];
  "запитващата юрисдикция"->"предявява иск 20/03/2018";
  "предявява иск 20/03/2018"->"запитващата юрисдикция";
  "бащата"->"запитващата юрисдикция"[label="бащата оспорва компетентността на запитващата юрисдикция да постановява каквито и да било решения относно детето."];
  "предявява иск 20/03/2018"->"с цел детето да бъде поставено под закрилата на тази юрисдикция и да бъде разпоредено тя и детето да се върнат в Обединеното кралство"[dir=none];
  "предявява иск 20/03/2018"->"обичайното местопребиваване на детето е било в Обединеното кралство."[dir=none];
    
    
}