mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: English

Following the judgment of the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Court of Appeal, Amsterdam), the applicant in the main proceedings brought an appeal in cassation before the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands), claiming that the displays at issue should be classified under subheading 85285100 of the CN, on the ground that they had characteristics and properties making them particularly suitable for displaying information from an automatic data-processing machine in large public spaces. Such a classification is supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’), approved by Council Decision 97/359/EC of 24 March 1997 concerning the elimination of duties on information technology products (OJ 1997 L 155, p. 1).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Applicant" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "Applicant"->"Brought an appeal in cassation";
    "Brought an appeal in cassation"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands)";
    "Brought an appeal in cassation"->"The displays at issue should be classified under subheading 85285100 of the CN, on the ground that they had characteristics and properties making them particularly suitable for displaying information from an automatic data-processing machine in large public spaces."[dir=none];
    "The displays at issue should be classified under subheading 85285100 of the CN, on the ground that they had characteristics and properties making them particularly suitable for displaying information from an automatic data-processing machine in large public spaces."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

След решението на Gerechtshof Amsterdam (апелативен съд Амстердам) жалбоподателят по главното производство подава касационна жалба пред Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Върховен съд, Нидерландия), като поддържа, че спорните екрани е трябвало да бъдат класирани в подпозиция 85285100 от КН, защото имат характеристики и свойства, които ги правят особено подходящи за показването в големи публични пространства на информация, постъпваща от автоматични машини за обработка на информация. Такова класиране било подкрепено от задълженията, произтичащи от Споразумението от 13 декември 1996 година за търговията с продукти на информационните технологии (наричано по-нататък „СИТ“), одобрено с Решение 97/359/ЕО на Съвета от 24 март 1997 година относно премахването на митата за продуктите на информационните технологии (ОВ L 155, 1997 г., стр. 1; Специално издание на български език, 2007 г., глава 11, том 14, стр. 186).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Върховен съд, Нидерландия)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "жалбоподателят по главното производство" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "жалбоподателят по главното производство"->"подава касационна жалба";
    "подава касационна жалба"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Върховен съд, Нидерландия)";
    "подава касационна жалба"->"Спорните екрани е трябвало да бъдат класирани в подпозиция 85285100 от КН, защото имат характеристики и свойства, които ги правят особено подходящи за показването в големи публични пространства на информация, постъпваща от автоматични машини за обработка на информация."[dir=none];
    "Спорните екрани е трябвало да бъдат класирани в подпозиция 85285100 от КН, защото имат характеристики и свойства, които ги правят особено подходящи за показването в големи публични пространства на информация, постъпваща от автоматични машини за обработка на информация."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

A raíz de la sentencia dictada por el gerechtshof Amsterdam (Tribunal de Apelación de Ámsterdam), la demandante en el litigio principal interpuso recurso de casación ante el Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Tribunal Supremo de los Países Bajos), en el que sostenía que las pantallas controvertidas debían clasificarse en la subpartida 85285100 de la NC, debido a que disponen de características y propiedades que las capacitan, en particular, para mostrar en grandes espacios públicos datos procedentes de máquinas automáticas para tratamiento o procesamiento de datos. Consideraba que tal clasificación viene confirmada por las obligaciones que derivan del Acuerdo de 13 de diciembre de 1996 sobre el Comercio de Productos de Tecnología de la Información (en lo sucesivo, «ATI»), aprobado mediante la Decisión 97/359/CE del Consejo, de 24 de marzo de 1997, relativa a la eliminación de los derechos relativos a los productos de tecnología de la información (DO 1997, L 155, p. 1).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "la demandante en el litigio principal" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "la demandante en el litigio principal"->"Interpuso recurso de casación";
    "Interpuso recurso de casación"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)";
    "Interpuso recurso de casación"->"Las pantallas controvertidas debían clasificarse en la subpartida 85285100 de la NC, debido a que disponen de características y propiedades que las capacitan, en particular, para mostrar en grandes espacios públicos datos procedentes de máquinas automáticas para tratamiento o procesamiento de datos."[dir=none];
    "Las pantallas controvertidas debían clasificarse en la subpartida 85285100 de la NC, debido a que disponen de características y propiedades que las capacitan, en particular, para mostrar en grandes espacios públicos datos procedentes de máquinas automáticas para tratamiento o procesamiento de datos."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

V návaznosti na vydání rozsudku Gerechtshof Amsterdam (odvolací soud v Amsterodamu) podala žalobkyně v původním řízení kasační opravný prostředek k Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Nejvyšší soud Nizozemska), v němž tvrdila, že sporné obrazovky mají být zařazeny do podpoložky 85285100 KN z důvodu, že se vyznačují charakteristikami a vlastnostmi, které je činí obzvláště vhodné k zobrazování informací ze zařízení pro automatizované zpracování dat ve velkých veřejných prostorách. Toto zařazení podporují závazky vyplývající z Dohody o obchodu s produkty informačních technologií ze dne 13. prosince 1996 (dále jen „ITA“), schválené rozhodnutím Rady 97/359/ES ze dne 24. března 1997 o odstranění cel pro produkty informačních technologií (Úř. věst. 1997, L 155, s. 1; Zvl. vyd. 11/26, s. 3).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Nejvyšší soud Nizozemska)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "žalobkyně" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "žalobkyně"->"podala žalobkyně v původním řízení kasační opravný prostředek";
    "podala žalobkyně v původním řízení kasační opravný prostředek"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Nejvyšší soud Nizozemska)";
    "podala žalobkyně v původním řízení kasační opravný prostředek"->"Sporné obrazovky mají být zařazeny do podpoložky 85285100 KN z důvodu, že se vyznačují charakteristikami a vlastnostmi, které je činí obzvláště vhodné k zobrazování informací ze zařízení pro automatizované zpracování dat ve velkých veřejných prostorách."[dir=none];
    "Sporné obrazovky mají být zařazeny do podpoložky 85285100 KN z důvodu, že se vyznačují charakteristikami a vlastnostmi, které je činí obzvláště vhodné k zobrazování informací ze zařízení pro automatizované zpracování dat ve velkých veřejných prostorách."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Efter Gerechtshof Amsterdams (appeldomstolen i Amsterdam) dom iværksatte sagsøgeren i hovedsagen kassationsappel ved Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Nederlandenes øverste domstol) med påstand om, at de omtvistede skærme skulle tariferes i underposition 85285100 i KN, eftersom de havde kendetegn og egenskaber, der gjorde dem særligt egnet til i store offentlige lokaler at vise informationer, der kommer fra en automatisk databehandlingsmaskine. En sådan tarifering finder støtte i de forpligtelser, der følger af overenskomsten af 13. december 1996 om informationsteknologiprodukter (herefter »ITA«), som blev godkendt ved Rådets afgørelse 97/359/EF af 24. marts 1997 om fjernelse af told på informationsteknologiprodukter (EUT 1997, L 155, s. 1).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "sagsøgeren" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "sagsøgeren"->"iværksatte sagsøgeren i hovedsagen kassationsappel";
    "iværksatte sagsøgeren i hovedsagen kassationsappel"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)";
    "iværksatte sagsøgeren i hovedsagen kassationsappel"->"de omtvistede skærme skulle tariferes i underposition 85285100 i KN, eftersom de havde kendetegn og egenskaber, der gjorde dem særligt egnet til i store offentlige lokaler at vise informationer, der kommer fra en automatisk databehandlingsmaskine."[dir=none];
    "de omtvistede skærme skulle tariferes i underposition 85285100 i KN, eftersom de havde kendetegn og egenskaber, der gjorde dem særligt egnet til i store offentlige lokaler at vise informationer, der kommer fra en automatisk databehandlingsmaskine."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: German

Gegen das Urteil des Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Gerichtshof Amsterdam) legte die X BV Kassationsbeschwerde beim Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Oberster Gerichtshof der Niederlande) ein und machte geltend, dass die streitigen Bildschirme in die KN‑Unterposition 85285100 einzureihen seien, weil sie über Merkmale und Eigenschaften verfügten, aufgrund deren sie sich besonders gut für die Anzeige von Informationen aus einer automatischen Datenverarbeitungsmaschine in großen öffentlichen Räumen eigneten. Für diese Einreihung sprächen auch die Verpflichtungen aus dem mit Beschluss 97/359/EG des Rates vom 24. März 1997 über die Beseitigung der Zölle auf Waren der Informationstechnologie (ABl. 1997, L 155, S. 1) genehmigten Übereinkommen vom 13. Dezember 1996 über den Handel mit Waren der Informationstechnologie (Information Technology Agreement, im Folgenden: ITA).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Oberster Gerichtshof der Niederlande)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "X BV" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "X BV"->"legte die X BV Kassationsbeschwerde ein";
    "legte die X BV Kassationsbeschwerde ein"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Oberster Gerichtshof der Niederlande)";
    "legte die X BV Kassationsbeschwerde ein"->"Die streitigen Bildschirme sollten in die KN‑Unterposition 85285100 einzureihen sein, weil sie über Merkmale und Eigenschaften verfügten, die sie besonders gut für die Anzeige von Informationen aus einer automatischen Datenverarbeitungsmaschine in großen öffentlichen Räumen geeignet machten."[dir=none];
    "Die streitigen Bildschirme sollten in die KN‑Unterposition 85285100 einzureihen sein, weil sie über Merkmale und Eigenschaften verfügten, die sie besonders gut für die Anzeige von Informationen aus einer automatischen Datenverarbeitungsmaschine in großen öffentlichen Räumen geeignet machten."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Pärast Gerechtshof Amsterdami (Amsterdami apellatsioonikohus) otsust esitas põhikohtuasja kaebaja kassatsioonkaebuse Hoge Raad der Nederlandenile (Madalmaade kõrgeim kohus), väites, et vaidlusalused monitorid tuleb klassifitseerida KNi alamrubriiki 85285100, kuna nad on oma omaduste ja tunnuste poolest eriti sobivad selleks, et kuvada automaatsest andmetöötlusseadmest pärinevat teavet suurtes avalikes ruumides. Sellist klassifikatsiooni kinnitavad tema sõnul kohustused, mis on sätestatud 13. detsembri 1996. aasta infotehnoloogiatoodetega kauplemise lepingus (edaspidi „ITA“), mis on heaks kiidetud nõukogu 24. märtsi 1997. aasta otsusega 97/359/EÜ infotehnoloogiatoodete tollimaksude kaotamise kohta (EÜT 1997, L 155, lk 1, ELT eriväljaanne 11/26, lk 3).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Hoge Raad der Nederlandenile (Madalmaade kõrgeim kohus))" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "põhikohtuasja kaebaja" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "põhikohtuasja kaebaja"->"Esitas põhikohtuasja kaebaja kassatsioonkaebuse";
    "Esitas põhikohtuasja kaebaja kassatsioonkaebuse"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Hoge Raad der Nederlandenile (Madalmaade kõrgeim kohus))";
    "Esitas põhikohtuasja kaebaja kassatsioonkaebuse"->"Vaidlusalused monitorid tuleb klassifitseerida KNi alamrubriiki 85285100, kuna nad on oma omaduste ja tunnuste poolest eriti sobivad selleks, et kuvada automaatsest andmetöötlusseadmest pärinevat teavet suurtes avalikes ruumides."[dir=none];
    "Vaidlusalused monitorid tuleb klassifitseerida KNi alamrubriiki 85285100, kuna nad on oma omaduste ja tunnuste poolest eriti sobivad selleks, et kuvada automaatsest andmetöötlusseadmest pärinevat teavet suurtes avalikes ruumides."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Κατόπιν της απόφασης που εξέδωσε το Gerechtshof Amsterdam (εφετείο Άμστερνταμ), η αναιρεσείουσα της κύριας δίκης άσκησε αναίρεση ενώπιον του Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Ανώτατου Δικαστηρίου των Κάτω Χωρών), υποστηρίζοντας ότι οι επίμαχες οθόνες έπρεπε να καταταγούν στη διάκριση 85285100 της ΣΟ, διότι διαθέτουν χαρακτηριστικά και ιδιότητες που τις καθιστούν κατάλληλες ιδίως για την εμφάνιση, σε μεγάλους δημόσιους χώρους, πληροφοριών προερχόμενων από αυτόματη μηχανή επεξεργασίας πληροφοριών. Υπέρ της κατάταξης στη διάκριση αυτή συνηγορούν οι υποχρεώσεις που απορρέουν από τη συμφωνία της 13ης Δεκεμβρίου 1996 για το εμπόριο προϊόντων της τεχνολογίας πληροφοριών (στο εξής: ΣΤΠ), η οποία εγκρίθηκε με την απόφαση 97/359/ΕΚ του Συμβουλίου, της 24ης Μαρτίου 1997, για την κατάργηση των δασμών που επιβάλλονται σε ορισμένα προϊόντα της τεχνολογίας πληροφοριών (ΕΕ 1997, L 155, σ. 1).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Ανώτατου Δικαστηρίου των Κάτω Χωρών)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "αναιρεσείουσα" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "αναιρεσείουσα"->"άσκησε αναίρεση";
    "άσκησε αναίρεση"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Ανώτατου Δικαστηρίου των Κάτω Χωρών)";
    "άσκησε αναίρεση"->"οι επίμαχες οθόνες έπρεπε να καταταγούν στη διάκριση 85285100 της ΣΟ, διότι διαθέτουν χαρακτηριστικά και ιδιότητες που τις καθιστούν κατάλληλες ιδίως για την εμφάνιση, σε μεγάλους δημόσιους χώρους, πληροφοριών προερχόμενων από αυτόματη μηχανή επεξεργασίας πληροφοριών."[dir=none];
    "οι επίμαχες οθόνες έπρεπε να καταταγούν στη διάκριση 85285100 της ΣΟ, διότι διαθέτουν χαρακτηριστικά και ιδιότητες που τις καθιστούν κατάλληλες ιδίως για την εμφάνιση, σε μεγάλους δημόσιους χώρους, πληροφοριών προερχόμενων από αυτόματη μηχανή επεξεργασίας πληροφοριών."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: French

À la suite de l’arrêt rendu par le Gerechtshof Amsterdam (cour d’appel d’Amsterdam), la requérante au principal a introduit un pourvoi en cassation devant le Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Cour suprême des Pays-Bas), soutenant que les écrans litigieux devaient être classés dans la sous-position 85285100 de la NC, au motif qu’ils disposent de caractéristiques et de propriétés qui les rendent en particulier aptes à afficher dans de vastes espaces publics des informations provenant d’une machine automatique de traitement de l’information. Un tel classement serait corroboré par les obligations découlant de l’accord du 13 décembre 1996 sur le commerce des produits des technologies de l’information (ci-après l’« ATI »), approuvé par la décision 97/359/CE du Conseil, du 24 mars 1997, concernant l’élimination des droits de douane sur les produits des technologies de l’information (JO 1997, L 155, p. 1).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Cour suprême des Pays-Bas)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "la requérante au principal" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "la requérante au principal"->"a introduit un pourvoi en cassation";
    "a introduit un pourvoi en cassation"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Cour suprême des Pays-Bas)";
    "a introduit un pourvoi en cassation"->"Les écrans litigieux devaient être classés dans la sous-position 85285100 de la NC, au motif qu’ils disposent de caractéristiques et de propriétés qui les rendent en particulier aptes à afficher dans de vastes espaces publics des informations provenant d’une machine automatique de traitement de l’information."[dir=none];
    "Les écrans litigieux devaient être classés dans la sous-position 85285100 de la NC, au motif qu’ils disposent de caractéristiques et de propriétés qui les rendent en particulier aptes à afficher dans de vastes espaces publics des informations provenant d’une machine automatique de traitement de l’information."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Nakon što je Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Žalbeni sud u Amsterdamu) donio presudu, tužitelj u glavnom postupku podnio je žalbu u kasacijskom postupku Hoge Raadu der Nederlanden (Vrhovni sud Nizozemske), tvrdeći da se sporni zasloni moraju razvrstati u podbroj 85285100 KN‑a jer imaju obilježja i svojstva koja ih čine osobito pogodnima za to da u velikim javnim prostorima reproduciraju podatke iz stroja za automatsku obradu podataka. Takvo razvrstavanje temelji se, prema njegovu mišljenju, na obvezama iz Sporazuma od 13. prosinca 1996. o trgovini proizvodima informacijske tehnologije (u daljnjem tekstu: ITA) koji je odobren Odlukom Vijeća 97/359/EZ od 24. ožujka 1997. o ukidanju carina na proizvode informacijske tehnologije (SL 1997., L 155, str. 1.) (SL, posebno izdanje na hrvatskom jeziku, poglavlje 11., svezak 37., str. 72.).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Vrhovni sud Nizozemske)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "tužitelj u glavnom postupku" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "tužitelj u glavnom postupku"->"Podnio je žalbu u kasacijskom postupku";
    "Podnio je žalbu u kasacijskom postupku"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Vrhovni sud Nizozemske)";
    "Podnio je žalbu u kasacijskom postupku"->"Sporni zasloni moraju se razvrstati u podbroj 85285100 KN‑a jer imaju obilježja i svojstva koja ih čine osobito pogodnima za to da u velikim javnim prostorima reproduciraju podatke iz stroja za automatsku obradu podataka."[dir=none];
    "Sporni zasloni moraju se razvrstati u podbroj 85285100 KN‑a jer imaju obilježja i svojstva koja ih čine osobito pogodnima za to da u velikim javnim prostorima reproduciraju podatke iz stroja za automatsku obradu podataka."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

A seguito della sentenza pronunciata dal Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Corte d’appello di Amsterdam), il ricorrente nel procedimento principale ha proposto un ricorso per cassazione dinanzi allo Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Corte suprema dei Paesi Bassi), sostenendo che gli schermi di cui trattasi dovevano essere classificati nella sottovoce 85285100 della NC, perché hanno caratteristiche e proprietà che li rendono in particolare idonei a visualizzare in ampi spazi pubblici informazioni provenienti da una macchina automatica per l’elaborazione dell’informazione. Una simile classificazione sarebbe confermata dagli obblighi derivanti dall’Accordo del 13 dicembre 1996 sul commercio dei prodotti delle tecnologie dell’informazione (in prosieguo: l’«ITA»), approvato dalla decisione 97/359/CE del Consiglio, del 24 marzo 1997, relativa all’abolizione dei dazi doganali sui prodotti delle tecnologie dell’informazione (GU 1997, L 155, pag. 1).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Corte suprema dei Paesi Bassi)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "il ricorrente" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "il ricorrente"->"ha proposto un ricorso per cassazione";
    "ha proposto un ricorso per cassazione"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Corte suprema dei Paesi Bassi)";
    "ha proposto un ricorso per cassazione"->"Gli schermi di cui trattasi dovevano essere classificati nella sottovoce 85285100 della NC, perché hanno caratteristiche e proprietà che li rendono in particolare idonei a visualizzare in ampi spazi pubblici informazioni provenienti da una macchina automatica per l’elaborazione dell’informazione."[dir=none];
    "Gli schermi di cui trattasi dovevano essere classificati nella sottovoce 85285100 della NC, perché hanno caratteristiche e proprietà che li rendono in particolare idonei a visualizzare in ampi spazi pubblici informazioni provenienti da una macchina automatica per l’elaborazione dell’informazione."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Pēc Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Amsterdamas apelācijas tiesa) sprieduma pasludināšanas prasītāja pamatlietā iesniedza kasācijas sūdzību Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Nīderlandes Augstākā tiesa), apgalvojot, ka strīdīgie ekrāni bija jāklasificē KN pozīcijā 85285100, pamatojoties uz to, ka tiem piemīt īpašības un pazīmes, kuru dēļ tie ir it īpaši piemēroti, lai tos izmantotu informācijas no automātiskās datu apstrādes iekārtas parādīšanai lielās publiskās telpās. Šāda klasifikācija esot apstiprināta ar pienākumiem, kādi izriet no 1996. gada 13. decembra Nolīguma par tirdzniecību ar informācijas tehnoloģiju produktiem (turpmāk tekstā – “NTI”), kas ir ticis apstiprināts ar Padomes Lēmumu 97/359/EEK (1997. gada 24. marts) par nodokļu atcelšanu informācijas tehnoloģiju produktiem (OV 1997, L 155, 1. lpp.).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Nīderlandes Augstākā tiesa)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "prasītāja" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "prasītāja"->"iesniedza kasācijas sūdzību";
    "iesniedza kasācijas sūdzību"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Nīderlandes Augstākā tiesa)";
    "iesniedza kasācijas sūdzību"->"Strīdīgie ekrāni bija jāklasificē KN pozīcijā 85285100, pamatojoties uz to, ka tiem piemīt īpašības un pazīmes, kuru dēļ tie ir it īpaši piemēroti, lai tos izmantotu informācijas no automātiskās datu apstrādes iekārtas parādīšanai lielās publiskās telpās."[dir=none];
    "Strīdīgie ekrāni bija jāklasificē KN pozīcijā 85285100, pamatojoties uz to, ka tiem piemīt īpašības un pazīmes, kuru dēļ tie ir it īpaši piemēroti, lai tos izmantotu informācijas no automātiskās datu apstrādes iekārtas parādīšanai lielās publiskās telpās."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Amsterdamo apeliacinis teismas) priėmus sprendimą, kasatorė pagrindinėje byloje padavė kasacinį skundą Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Nyderlandų Aukščiausiasis Teismas) ir tvirtino, kad aptariami ekranai turi būti priskirti prie KN 85285100 subpozicijos, nes dėl savo požymių ir savybių jie ypač tinka iš automatinio duomenų apdorojimo mašinos gautai informacijai rodyti didelėse viešose patalpose. Tokį klasifikavimą pagrindžia pareigos, nustatytos 1996 m. gruodžio 13 d. Susitarime dėl prekybos informacijos technologijų produktais (toliau – SIT), kuris buvo patvirtintas 1997 m. kovo 24 d. Tarybos sprendimu 97/359/EB dėl informacinių technologijų produktams taikomų mokesčių panaikinimo (OL L 155, 1997, p. 1; 2004 m. specialusis leidimas lietuvių k., 11 sk., 26 t., p. 3).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Nyderlandų Aukščiausiasis Teismas)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "kasatorė" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "kasatorė"->"padavė kasacinį skundą";
    "padavė kasacinį skundą"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Nyderlandų Aukščiausiasis Teismas)";
    "padavė kasacinį skundą"->"Aptariami ekranai turi būti priskirti prie KN 85285100 subpozicijos, nes dėl savo požymių ir savybių jie ypač tinka iš automatinio duomenų apdorojimo mašinos gautai informacijai rodyti didelėse viešose patalpose."[dir=none];
    "Aptariami ekranai turi būti priskirti prie KN 85285100 subpozicijos, nes dėl savo požymių ir savybių jie ypač tinka iš automatinio duomenų apdorojimo mašinos gautai informacijai rodyti didelėse viešose patalpose."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

A Gerechtshof Amsterdam (amszterdami fellebbviteli bíróság) ítéletét követően az alapügy felperese felülvizsgálat iránti kérelmet nyújtott be a Hoge Raad der Nederlandenhez (Hollandia legfelsőbb bírósága), azt állítva, hogy a vitatott kijelzőket a KN 85285100 vámtarifaalszám alá kell besorolni, mivel rendelkeznek azokkal a jellemzőkkel és tulajdonságokkal, amelyek különösen alkalmassá teszik azokat arra, hogy egy automatikus adatfeldolgozó gépből származó információkat tüntessenek fel nagy méretű nyilvános helyeken. Ezt a besorolást az információtechnológiai termékek vámjainak megszüntetéséről szóló, 1997. március 24‑i 97/359/EK tanácsi határozattal (HL L 155., 1. o.; magyar nyelvű különkiadás 11. fejezet, 26. kötet, 3. o.) jóváhagyott, az információtechnológiai termékek kereskedelméről szóló, 1996. december 13‑i megállapodásból (a továbbiakban: ITA) eredő kötelezettségek is megerősítik.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "alapügy felperese" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "alapügy felperese"->"felülvizsgálat iránti kérelmet nyújtott be";
    "felülvizsgálat iránti kérelmet nyújtott be"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)";
    "felülvizsgálat iránti kérelmet nyújtott be"->"A vitatott kijelzőket a KN 85285100 vámtarifaalszám alá kell besorolni, mivel rendelkeznek azokkal a jellemzőkkel és tulajdonságokkal, amelyek különösen alkalmassá teszik azokat arra, hogy egy automatikus adatfeldolgozó gépből származó információkat tüntessenek fel nagy méretű nyilvános helyeken."[dir=none];
    "A vitatott kijelzőket a KN 85285100 vámtarifaalszám alá kell besorolni, mivel rendelkeznek azokkal a jellemzőkkel és tulajdonságokkal, amelyek különösen alkalmassá teszik azokat arra, hogy egy automatikus adatfeldolgozó gépből származó információkat tüntessenek fel nagy méretű nyilvános helyeken."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Wara s-sentenza mogħtija mill-Gerechtshof Amsterdam (il-Qorti tal-Appell ta’ Amsterdam), ir-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali ppreżentat appell ta’ kassazzjoni quddiem il-Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (il-Qorti Suprema tal-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi), billi sostniet li l-iskrins inkwistjoni kellhom jiġu kklassifikati fis-subintestatura 85285100 tan-NM, u dan għar-raġuni li dawn għandhom karatteristiċi u attributi li jagħmluhom partikolarment adatti biex juru, fi spazji pubbliċi kbar, informazzjoni li toriġina minn magna awtomatika tal-ipproċessar ta’ data. Tali klassifikazzjoni hija kkorroborata mill-obbligi li jirriżultaw mill-Ftehim tat-13 ta’ Diċembru 1996 dwar il-kummerċ tal-prodotti teknoloġiċi tal-informatika (iktar ’il quddiem il-“FTI”), approvat permezz tad-Deċiżjoni tal-Kunsill 97/359/KE tal-24 ta’ Marzu 1997 li tirrigwarda l-eliminazzjoni ta’ dazji minn fuq prodotti tekonoloġiċi ta’ l-informatika (ĠU Edizzjoni Speċjali bil-Malti, Kapitolu 11, Vol. 26, p. 3).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (il-Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "ir-rikorrenti" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "ir-rikorrenti"->"ppreżentat appell ta’ kassazzjoni";
    "ppreżentat appell ta’ kassazzjoni"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (il-Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)";
    "ppreżentat appell ta’ kassazzjoni"->"L-iskrins inkwistjoni kellhom jiġu kklassifikati fis-subintestatura 85285100 tan-NM, u dan għar-raġuni li dawn għandhom karatteristiċi u attributi li jagħmluhom partikolarment adatti biex juru, fi spazji pubbliċi kbar, informazzjoni li toriġina minn magna awtomatika tal-ipproċessar ta’ data."[dir=none];
    "L-iskrins inkwistjoni kellhom jiġu kklassifikati fis-subintestatura 85285100 tan-NM, u dan għar-raġuni li dawn għandhom karatteristiċi u attributi li jagħmluhom partikolarment adatti biex juru, fi spazji pubbliċi kbar, informazzjoni li toriġina minn magna awtomatika tal-ipproċessar ta’ data."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding heeft, nadat het arrest van het Gerechtshof Amsterdam was gewezen, cassatieberoep ingesteld bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden. Zij stelde dat de litigieuze beeldschermen moesten worden ingedeeld in postonderverdeling 85285100 van de GN, omdat deze over kenmerken en eigenschappen beschikken die deze in het bijzonder geschikt maken om in grote openbare ruimten informatie weer te geven die afkomstig is van een automatische gegevensverwerkende machine. Een dergelijke indeling zou worden gestaafd door de verplichtingen die voortvloeien uit de overeenkomst van 13 december 1996 inzake de handel in informatietechnologieproducten (Information Technology Agreement; hierna: „ITA”), goedgekeurd bij besluit 97/359/EG van de Raad van 24 maart 1997 betreffende afschaffing van de rechten op informatietechnologieproducten (PB 1997, L 155, blz. 1).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding"->"cassatieberoep ingesteld";
    "cassatieberoep ingesteld"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)";
    "cassatieberoep ingesteld"->"De litigieuze beeldschermen moesten worden ingedeeld in postonderverdeling 85285100 van de GN, omdat deze over kenmerken en eigenschappen beschikken die deze in het bijzonder geschikt maken om in grote openbare ruimten informatie weer te geven die afkomstig is van een automatische gegevensverwerkende machine."[dir=none];
    "De litigieuze beeldschermen moesten worden ingedeeld in postonderverdeling 85285100 van de GN, omdat deze over kenmerken en eigenschappen beschikken die deze in het bijzonder geschikt maken om in grote openbare ruimten informatie weer te geven die afkomstig is van een automatische gegevensverwerkende machine."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W następstwie wyroku wydanego przez Gerechtshof Amsterdam (sąd apelacyjny w Amsterdamie), skarżąca w postępowaniu głównym wniosła skargę kasacyjną do Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (sądu najwyższego w Niderlandach), podnosząc, że sporne ekrany powinny zostać sklasyfikowane w ramach podpozycji CN 85285100 ze względu na to, że posiadają cechy i właściwości, które sprawiają, że są one w szczególności właściwe do wyświetlania w dużych przestrzeniach publicznych danych pochodzących z maszyny do automatycznego przetwarzania danych. Klasyfikacja ta jest potwierdzona zobowiązaniami wynikającymi z porozumienia z dnia 13 grudnia 1996 r. w sprawie handlu produktami technologii informacyjnej (zwanego dalej „ITA”), zatwierdzonego decyzją Rady 97/359/WE z dnia 24 marca 1997 r. dotyczącą zniesienia ceł na produkty technologii informacyjnej (Dz.U. 1997, L 155, s. 1 – wyd. spec. w jęz. polskim, rozdz. 11, t. 26, s. 3).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "skarżąca" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "skarżąca"->"wniosła skargę kasacyjną";
    "wniosła skargę kasacyjną"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)";
    "wniosła skargę kasacyjną"->"Sporne ekrany powinny zostać sklasyfikowane w ramach podpozycji CN 85285100 ze względu na to, że posiadają cechy i właściwości, które sprawiają, że są one w szczególności właściwe do wyświetlania w dużych przestrzeniach publicznych danych pochodzących z maszyny do automatycznego przetwarzania danych."[dir=none];
    "Sporne ekrany powinny zostać sklasyfikowane w ramach podpozycji CN 85285100 ze względu na to, że posiadają cechy i właściwości, które sprawiają, że są one w szczególności właściwe do wyświetlania w dużych przestrzeniach publicznych danych pochodzących z maszyny do automatycznego przetwarzania danych."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.
Case C-288/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Na sequência do acórdão proferido pelo Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Tribunal de Recurso de Amesterdão), a recorrente no processo principal interpôs recurso de cassação para o Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supremo Tribunal dos Países Baixos), sustentando que os ecrãs em causa deviam ser classificados na subposição 85285100 da NC, com o fundamento de que têm características e propriedades que os tornam particularmente aptos a apresentar em grandes espaços públicos dados provenientes de uma máquina automática para processamento de dados. Essa classificação seria corroborada pelas obrigações decorrentes do Acordo sobre o Comércio de Produtos das Tecnologias da Informação (a seguir «ATI»), de 13 de dezembro de 1996, aprovado pela Decisão 97/359/CE do Conselho, de 24 de março de 1997, relativa à eliminação dos direitos aplicáveis aos produtos das tecnologias da informação (JO 1997, L 155, p. 1).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supremo Tribunal dos Países Baixos)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "a recorrente no processo principal" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)" [shape=trapezium];

    "a recorrente no processo principal"->"interpôs recurso de cassação";
    "interpôs recurso de cassação"->"Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supremo Tribunal dos Países Baixos)";
    "interpôs recurso de cassação"->"Os ecrãs em causa deviam ser classificados na subposição 85285100 da NC, com o fundamento de que têm características e propriedades que os tornam particularmente aptos a apresentar em grandes espaços públicos dados provenientes de uma máquina automática para processamento de dados."[dir=none];
    "Os ecrãs em causa deviam ser classificados na subposição 85285100 da NC, com o fundamento de que têm características e propriedades que os tornam particularmente aptos a apresentar em grandes espaços públicos dados provenientes de uma máquina automática para processamento de dados."->"Supported by the obligations arising under the Agreement of 13 December 1996 on trade in information technology products (‘the ITA’)"[dir=none];
}