mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

L’università di Cambridge contestava la decisione di detta amministrazione dinanzi al First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [Tribunale di primo grado (sezione tributaria), Regno Unito]. Tale giudice, considerando che i compensi relativi alla gestione del fondo di cui trattasi costituivano spese sostenute per le esigenze delle attività economiche dell’università di Cambridge e che, per tale motivo, facevano parte delle spese generali di quest’ultima, accoglieva la domanda dell’università di Cambridge. Poiché tale valutazione era stata confermata dall’Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) [Tribunale superiore (sezione tributaria e del pubblico registro e della cancelleria, Regno Unito)], l’amministrazione tributaria interponeva appello contro la decisione di quest’ultimo giudice dinanzi alla Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) [Corte d’appello (Inghilterra e Galles) (sezione civile), Regno Unito].

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "amministrazione tributaria"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (sezione tributaria) (Regno Unito)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (Tribunale superiore (sezione tributaria e del pubblico registro e della cancelleria, Regno Unito)) (Regno Unito)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (Inghilterra e Galles) (sezione civile) (Regno Unito)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (sezione tributaria) (Regno Unito)"[label="contestava la decisione di detta amministrazione"];
  "First-tier Tribunal (sezione tributaria) (Regno Unito)"->"accolgieva la domanda";
  "accolgieva la domanda"->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (Tribunale superiore (sezione tributaria e del pubblico registro e della cancelleria, Regno Unito)) (Regno Unito)"->"accolgieva la domanda"[label="accolgieva la domanda"];
  "accolgieva la domanda"->"I compensi relativi alla gestione del fondo di cui trattasi costituivano spese sostenute per le esigenze delle attività economiche dell’università di Cambridge e che, per tale motivo, facevano parte delle spese generali di quest’ultima.."[dir=none];
  "amministrazione tributaria"->"Court of Appeal (Inghilterra e Galles) (sezione civile) (Regno Unito)"[label="interponeva appello contro la decisione"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Par minētās administrācijas lēmumu Kembridžas Universitāte cēla prasību First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (Administratīvā pirmās instances tiesa (Nodokļu lietu palāta), Apvienotā Karaliste). Šī tiesa, uzskatīdama, ka komisijas maksas, kas saistītas ar attiecīgā fonda pārvaldību, ir izdevumi, kuri izdarīti Kembridžas Universitātes saimnieciskajai darbībai, un ka šajā ziņā tās esot pēdējās minētās pieskaitāmo izmaksu daļa, apmierināja Kembridžas Universitātes prasību. Tā kā šo vērtējumu apstiprināja Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (Administratīvā virstiesa (Nodokļu un kanclera kompetences lietu palāta), Apvienotā Karaliste), nodokļu administrācija iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību par šīs pēdējās minētās tiesas nolēmumu Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (Apelācijas tiesa (Anglija un Velsa) (Civillietu palāta), Apvienotā Karaliste).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "nodokļu administrācija"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (Nodokļu lietu palāta) (Apvienotā Karaliste)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (Nodokļu un kanclera kompetences lietu palāta) (Apvienotā Karaliste)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (Anglija un Velsa) (Civillietu palāta) (Apvienotā Karaliste)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (Nodokļu lietu palāta) (Apvienotā Karaliste)"[label="cēla prasību"];
  "First-tier Tribunal (Nodokļu lietu palāta) (Apvienotā Karaliste)"->"apmierināja Kembridžas Universitātes prasību.";
  "apmierināja Kembridžas Universitātes prasību."->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (Nodokļu un kanclera kompetences lietu palāta) (Apvienotā Karaliste)"->"apmierināja Kembridžas Universitātes prasību."[label="apstiprināja"];
  "apmierināja Kembridžas Universitātes prasību."->"Komisijas maksas, kas saistītas ar attiecīgā fonda pārvaldību, ir izdevumi, kuri izdarīti Kembridžas Universitātes saimnieciskajai darbībai, un ka šajā ziņā tās esot pēdējās minētās pieskaitāmo izmaksu daļa.."[dir=none];
  "nodokļu administrācija"->"Court of Appeal (Anglija un Velsa) (Civillietu palāta) (Apvienotā Karaliste)"[label="iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību par šīs pēdējās minētās tiesas nolēmumu"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Kembridžo universitetas apskundė minėtą sprendimą First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (Pirmosios instancijos teismas (mokesčių bylų skyrius), Jungtinė Karalystė). Šis teismas, atsižvelgdamas į tai, kad komisiniai mokesčiai už atitinkamo fondo valdymą sudarė išlaidas, kurios patirtos Kembridžo universiteto ekonominės veiklos tikslais, ir kad jie sudarė dalį Kembridžo universiteto bendrųjų išlaidų, patenkino Kembridžo universiteto prašymą. Kadangi šį vertinimą patvirtino Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (Aukštesnysis teismas (Mokesčių ir lordo kanclerio skyrius), Jungtinė Karalystė), mokesčių administratorius pateikė apeliacinį skundą dėl šio teismo sprendimo Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (Apeliacinis teismas (Anglija ir Velsas) (Civilinių bylų skyrius), Jungtinė Karalystė).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mokesčių administratorius"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (mokesčių bylų skyrius) (Jungtinė Karalystė)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (Mokesčių ir lordo kanclerio skyrius) (Jungtinė Karalystė)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (Anglija ir Velsas) (Civilinių bylų skyrius) (Jungtinė Karalystė)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (mokesčių bylų skyrius) (Jungtinė Karalystė)"[label="apskundė minėtą sprendimą"];
  "First-tier Tribunal (mokesčių bylų skyrius) (Jungtinė Karalystė)"->"patenkino Kembridžo universiteto prašymą";
  "patenkino Kembridžo universiteto prašymą"->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (Mokesčių ir lordo kanclerio skyrius) (Jungtinė Karalystė)"->"patenkino Kembridžo universiteto prašymą"[label="patvirtino"];
  "patenkino Kembridžo universiteto prašymą"->"Komisiniai mokesčiai už atitinkamo fondo valdymą sudarė išlaidas, kurios patirtos Kembridžo universiteto ekonominės veiklos tikslais, ir kad jie sudarė dalį Kembridžo universiteto bendrųjų išlaidų.."[dir=none];
  "mokesčių administratorius"->"Court of Appeal (Anglija ir Velsas) (Civilinių bylų skyrius) (Jungtinė Karalystė)"[label="apskundė minėtą sprendimą"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

A cambridge‑i egyetem a First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (elsőfokú bíróság [adójogi tanács], Egyesült Királyság) előtt vitatta az említett adóhatóság határozatát. E bíróság, miután megállapította, hogy az érintett alap kezeléséhez kapcsolódó díjak a cambridge‑i egyetem gazdasági tevékenységeinek szükségletei körében felmerült kiadásoknak minősülnek, és hogy azok e címen ez utóbbi általános költségeinek minősülnek, helyt adott a cambridge‑i egyetem kérelmének. Mivel az Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (másodfokú bíróság [adóügyi és kancelláriai tanács], Egyesült Királyság) helybenhagyta ezt az értékelést, az adóhatóság fellebbezést nyújtott be ez utóbbi bíróság határozatával szemben a Court of Appealhez (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (fellebbviteli bíróság [Anglia és Wales] [polgári kollégium], Egyesült Királyság).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "adóhatóság"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (adójogi tanács) (Egyesült Királyság)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (adóügyi és kancelláriai tanács) (Egyesült Királyság)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (Anglia és Wales) (polgári kollégium) (Egyesült Királyság)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (adójogi tanács) (Egyesült Királyság)"[label="vitatta az említett adóhatóság határozatát."];
  "First-tier Tribunal (adójogi tanács) (Egyesült Királyság)"->"helyt adott a cambridge‑i egyetem kérelmének.";
  "helyt adott a cambridge‑i egyetem kérelmének."->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (adóügyi és kancelláriai tanács) (Egyesült Királyság)"->"helyt adott a cambridge‑i egyetem kérelmének."[label="helybenhagyta"];
  "helyt adott a cambridge‑i egyetem kérelmének."->"Az érintett alap kezeléséhez kapcsolódó díjak a cambridge‑i egyetem gazdasági tevékenységeinek szükségletei körében felmerült kiadásoknak minősülnek, és hogy azok e címen ez utóbbi általános költségeinek minősülnek.."[dir=none];
  "adóhatóság"->"Court of Appeal (Anglia és Wales) (polgári kollégium) (Egyesült Királyság)"[label="fellebbezést nyújtott be ez utóbbi bíróság határozatával szemben"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

L-Università ta’ Cambridge ikkontestat id-deċiżjoni tal-imsemmija amministrazzjoni quddiem il-First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (il-Qorti tal-Ewwel Istanza (Awla Fiskali), ir-Renju Unit). Din il-qorti, peress li qieset li l-kummissjonijiet għall-ġestjoni tal-fond ikkonċernat kienu jikkostitwixxu spejjeż sostnuti għall-bżonnijiet tal-attivitajiet ekonomiċi tal-Università ta’ Cambridge u li, bħala tali, huma kienu jiffurmaw parti mill-ispejjeż ġenerali ta’ din tal-aħħar, laqgħet it-talba tal-Università ta’ Cambridge. Peress li din l-evalwazzjoni ġiet ikkonfermata mill-Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (il-Qorti Superjuri (Awla tat-Taxxa u tal-Ekwità, ir-Renju Unit)), l-amministrazzjoni fiskali appellat mid-deċiżjoni ta’ din l-aħħar qorti quddiem il-Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (il-Qorti tal-Appell (Ingilterra u Wales) (Sezzjoni Ċivili), ir-Renju Unit).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l-amministrazzjoni"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (Awla Fiskali) (Renju Unit)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (il-Qorti Superjuri (Awla tat-Taxxa u tal-Ekwità, ir-Renju Unit)) (Renju Unit)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (Ingilterra u Wales) (Sezzjoni Ċivili) (Renju Unit)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (Awla Fiskali) (Renju Unit)"[label="Ikkontestat id-deċiżjoni tal-imsemmija amministrazzjoni"];
  "First-tier Tribunal (Awla Fiskali) (Renju Unit)"->"laqgħet it-talba tal-Università ta’ Cambridge";
  "laqgħet it-talba tal-Università ta’ Cambridge"->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (il-Qorti Superjuri (Awla tat-Taxxa u tal-Ekwità, ir-Renju Unit)) (Renju Unit)"->"laqgħet it-talba tal-Università ta’ Cambridge"[label="laqgħet it-talba tal-Università ta’ Cambridge."];
  "laqgħet it-talba tal-Università ta’ Cambridge"->"Il-kummissjonijiet għall-ġestjoni tal-fond ikkonċernat kienu jikkostitwixxu spejjeż sostnuti għall-bżonnijiet tal-attivitajiet ekonomiċi tal-Università ta’ Cambridge u li, bħala tali, huma kienu jiffurmaw parti mill-ispejjeż ġenerali ta’ din tal-aħħar.."[dir=none];
  "l-amministrazzjoni"->"Court of Appeal (Ingilterra u Wales) (Sezzjoni Ċivili) (Renju Unit)"[label="appellat mid-deċiżjoni ta’"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

De universiteit van Cambridge heeft de beslissing van die dienst aangevochten bij de First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [belastingrechter in eerste aanleg, Verenigd Koninkrijk]. Die rechter heeft de vordering van de universiteit van Cambridge toegewezen en heeft geoordeeld dat de beheersvergoedingen voor het betrokken fonds uitgaven waren die voor de universiteit waren opgekomen ten behoeve van haar economische activiteiten en derhalve deel uitmaakten van haar algemene kosten. Deze beoordeling is door de Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) [belastingrechter in tweede aanleg, Verenigd Koninkrijk] bevestigd, waarna de belastingdienst hoger beroep heeft ingesteld bij de Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) [rechter in tweede aanleg in burgerlijke zaken, Engeland en Wales, Verenigd Koninkrijk].

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "belastingdienst"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (belastingrechter) (Verenigd Koninkrijk)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (belastingrechter in tweede aanleg) (Verenigd Koninkrijk)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (Engeland en Wales) (rechter in tweede aanleg in burgerlijke zaken) (Verenigd Koninkrijk)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (belastingrechter) (Verenigd Koninkrijk)"[label="heeft de beslissing van die dienst aangevochten"];
  "First-tier Tribunal (belastingrechter) (Verenigd Koninkrijk)"->"heeft de vordering van de universiteit van Cambridge toegewezen";
  "heeft de vordering van de universiteit van Cambridge toegewezen"->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (belastingrechter in tweede aanleg) (Verenigd Koninkrijk)"->"heeft de vordering van de universiteit van Cambridge toegewezen"[label="bevestigd"];
  "heeft de vordering van de universiteit van Cambridge toegewezen"->"De beheersvergoedingen voor het betrokken fonds uitgaven waren die voor de universiteit waren opgekomen ten behoeve van haar economische activiteiten en derhalve deel uitmaakten van haar algemene kosten.."[dir=none];
  "belastingdienst"->"Court of Appeal (Engeland en Wales) (rechter in tweede aanleg in burgerlijke zaken) (Verenigd Koninkrijk)"[label="heeft de beslissing van die dienst aangevochten"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Uniwersytet w Cambridge zaskarżył decyzję tego organu do First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [sądu pierwszej instancji (izby podatkowej), Zjednoczone Królestwo]. Sąd ten, uznając, że opłaty za zarządzanie funduszem stanowiły wydatki poniesione na potrzeby działalności gospodarczej uniwersytetu w Cambridge oraz że z tego tytułu były częścią jego kosztów ogólnych, uwzględnił żądanie uniwersytetu w Cambridge. Ponieważ stanowisko to zostało potwierdzone przez Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) [sąd wyższej instancji (izbę podatkową i kanclerską, Zjednoczone Królestwo)], organ podatkowy wniósł odwołanie od orzeczenia tegoż sądu do Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) [sądu apelacyjnego (Anglia i Walia) (wydziału cywilnego), Zjednoczone Królestwo].

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "organ podatkowy"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (izby podatkowej) (Zjednoczone Królestwo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (izbę podatkową i kanclerską) (Zjednoczone Królestwo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (Anglia i Walia) (wydziału cywilnego) (Zjednoczone Królestwo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (izby podatkowej) (Zjednoczone Królestwo)"[label="Uniwersytet w Cambridge zaskarżył decyzję tego organu"];
  "First-tier Tribunal (izby podatkowej) (Zjednoczone Królestwo)"->"uwzględnił żądanie uniwersytetu w Cambridge.";
  "uwzględnił żądanie uniwersytetu w Cambridge."->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (izbę podatkową i kanclerską) (Zjednoczone Królestwo)"->"uwzględnił żądanie uniwersytetu w Cambridge."[label="uwzględnił"];
  "uwzględnił żądanie uniwersytetu w Cambridge."->"Opłaty za zarządzanie funduszem stanowiły wydatki poniesione na potrzeby działalności gospodarczej uniwersytetu w Cambridge oraz że z tego tytułu były częścią jego kosztów ogólnych.."[dir=none];
  "organ podatkowy"->"Court of Appeal (Anglia i Walia) (wydziału cywilnego) (Zjednoczone Królestwo)"[label="zaskarżył decyzję"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

A Universidade de Cambridge impugnou a decisão da Administração Fiscal no First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [Tribunal de Primeira Instância (Secção Tributária), Reino Unido]. Este tribunal, considerando que as comissões de gestão do fundo em causa constituíam despesas realizadas para a realização das atividades económicas da Universidade de Cambridge e que, a este título, fazem parte dos seus custos gerais, deu provimento ao recurso da Universidade de Cambridge. Este entendimento foi confirmado por decisão do Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) [Tribunal Superior (Secção Tributária e da Chancelaria), Reino Unido], da qual a Administração Fiscal interpôs recurso para a Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) [Tribunal de Recurso (Inglaterra e País de Gales) (Secção Cível), Reino Unido].

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Administração Fiscal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (Secção Tributária) (Reino Unido)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (Secção Tributária e da Chancelaria) (Reino Unido)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (Inglaterra e País de Gales) (Secção Cível) (Reino Unido)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (Secção Tributária) (Reino Unido)"[label="impugnou a decisão da Administração Fiscal"];
  "First-tier Tribunal (Secção Tributária) (Reino Unido)"->"deu provimento ao recurso";
  "deu provimento ao recurso"->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (Secção Tributária e da Chancelaria) (Reino Unido)"->"deu provimento ao recurso"[label="deu provimento ao recurso"];
  "deu provimento ao recurso"->"as comissões de gestão do fundo em causa constituíam despesas realizadas para a realização das atividades económicas da Universidade de Cambridge e que, a este título, fazem parte dos seus custos gerais."[dir=none];
  "Administração Fiscal"->"Court of Appeal (Inglaterra e País de Gales) (Secção Cível) (Reino Unido)"[label="impugnou a decisão"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Universitatea din Cambridge a contestat decizia respectivei administrații la First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [Tribunalul de Primă Instanță (Camera fiscală), Regatul Unit]. Această instanță, considerând că comisioanele referitoare la administrarea fondului în cauză constituiau cheltuieli suportate pentru nevoile activităților economice ale Universității din Cambridge și că, în această calitate, ele făceau parte din cheltuielile generale ale acesteia din urmă, a admis cererea Universității din Cambridge. Întrucât această apreciere a fost confirmată de Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) [Tribunalul Superior (Camera fiscală și a cancelariei), Regatul Unit], administrația fiscală a declarat apel împotriva deciziei acestei din urmă instanțe în fața Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) [Curtea de Apel (Anglia și Țara Galilor) (Secția civilă), Regatul Unit].

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "comisioanele referitoare"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (Camera fiscală) (Regatul Unit)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (Camera fiscală și a cancelariei) (Regatul Unit)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (Anglia și Țara Galilor) (Secția civilă) (Regatul Unit)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (Camera fiscală) (Regatul Unit)"[label="a contestat decizia respectivei administrații"];
  "First-tier Tribunal (Camera fiscală) (Regatul Unit)"->"a admis cererea Universității din Cambridge.";
  "a admis cererea Universității din Cambridge."->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (Camera fiscală și a cancelariei) (Regatul Unit)"->"a admis cererea Universității din Cambridge."[label="a admis cererea Universității din Cambridge"];
  "a admis cererea Universității din Cambridge."->"Comisioanele referitoare la administrarea fondului în cauză constituiau cheltuieli suportate pentru nevoile activităților economice ale Universității din Cambridge și că, în această calitate, ele făceau parte din cheltuielile generale ale acesteia din urmă.."[dir=none];
  "comisioanele referitoare"->"Court of Appeal (Anglia și Țara Galilor) (Secția civilă) (Regatul Unit)"[label="a declarat apel împotriva deciziei"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Univerzita v Cambridge napadla rozhodnutie uvedeného úradu na First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [prvostupňový súd (daňový senát), Spojené kráľovstvo]. Tento súd, ktorý zastával názor, že poplatky za správu príslušného fondu predstavujú výdavky vynaložené pre potreby hospodárskej činnosti univerzity v Cambridge a ako také sú súčasťou všeobecných výdavkov tejto univerzity, návrhu tejto univerzity vyhovel. Keďže toto posúdenie potvrdil aj Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) [druhostupňový súd (oddelenie pre daňové a majetkové spory), Spojené kráľovstvo], daňový úrad podal odvolanie proti rozsudku tohto súdu na Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) [Odvolací súd (Anglicko a Wales) (občianskoprávny senát), Spojené kráľovstvo].

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "daňový úrad"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (daňový senát) (Spojené kráľovstvo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (daňové a majetkové spory) (Spojené kráľovstvo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (Anglicko a Wales) (občianskoprávny senát) (Spojené kráľovstvo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (daňový senát) (Spojené kráľovstvo)"[label="Univerzita v Cambridge napadla rozhodnutie uvedeného úradu"];
  "First-tier Tribunal (daňový senát) (Spojené kráľovstvo)"->"návrhu tejto univerzity vyhovel.";
  "návrhu tejto univerzity vyhovel."->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (daňové a majetkové spory) (Spojené kráľovstvo)"->"návrhu tejto univerzity vyhovel."[label="vyhovel"];
  "návrhu tejto univerzity vyhovel."->"Poplatky za správu príslušného fondu predstavujú výdavky vynaložené pre potreby hospodárskej činnosti univerzity v Cambridge a ako také sú súčasťou všeobecných výdavkov tejto univerzity.."[dir=none];
  "daňový úrad"->"Court of Appeal (Anglicko a Wales) (občianskoprávny senát) (Spojené kráľovstvo)"[label="napadla rozhodnutie"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Univerza v Cambridgeu je odločbo te uprave izpodbijala pri First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (prvostopenjsko sodišče (davčni oddelek), Združeno kraljestvo). To sodišče je ocenilo, da so bile provizije v zvezi z upravljanjem zadevnega sklada stroški za potrebe ekonomskih dejavnosti univerze v Cambridgeu in da so bili iz tega naslova del splošnih stroškov te univerze ter ugodilo zahtevku univerze v Cambridgeu. To presojo je potrdilo Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (višje sodišče, oddelek za davčne in gospodarske spore, Združeno kraljestvo)), zato je davčna uprava zoper odločbo tega sodišča vložila pritožbo pri Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (pritožbeno sodišče (Anglija in Wales) (civilni oddelek), Združeno kraljestvo).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "davčna uprava"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (davčni oddelek) (Združeno kraljestvo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (oddelek za davčne in gospodarske spore) (Združeno kraljestvo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (Anglija in Wales) (civilni oddelek) (Združeno kraljestvo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (davčni oddelek) (Združeno kraljestvo)"[label="Univerza v Cambridgeu je odločbo te uprave izpodbijala pri First-tier Tribunal (davčni oddelek)"];
  "First-tier Tribunal (davčni oddelek) (Združeno kraljestvo)"->"ugodilo zahtevku";
  "ugodilo zahtevku"->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (oddelek za davčne in gospodarske spore) (Združeno kraljestvo)"->"ugodilo zahtevku"[label="ugodilo zahtevku"];
  "ugodilo zahtevku"->"Da so bile provizije v zvezi z upravljanjem zadevnega sklada stroški za potrebe ekonomskih dejavnosti univerze v Cambridgeu in da so bili iz tega naslova del splošnih stroškov te univerze.."[dir=none];
  "davčna uprava"->"Court of Appeal (Anglija in Wales) (civilni oddelek) (Združeno kraljestvo)"[label="je odločbo te uprave izpodbijala"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Cambridgen yliopisto riitautti tämän päätöksen First-tier Tribunalissa (Tax Chamber) (alioikeus, verojaosto; Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta). Kyseinen tuomioistuin katsoi, että mainitun rahaston hoidosta aiheutuneet maksut olivat Cambridgen yliopiston liiketoimintaan liittyviä tarpeita koskevia kuluja ja että tällä perusteella ne olivat osa yliopiston yleiskustannuksia, ja hyväksyi Cambridgen yliopiston vaatimuksen. Koska Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (ylioikeus, vero- ja sosiaalijaosto; Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta) vahvisti tämän kannan, verohallinto valitti kyseisen tuomioistuimen ratkaisusta Court of Appealiin (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (Englannin ja Walesin ylioikeus (siviiliasioiden osasto), Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "verohallinto"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (verojaosto) (Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (vero- ja sosiaalijaosto) (Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (Englannin ja Walesin) (siviiliasioiden osasto) (Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (verojaosto) (Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta)"[label="riitautti tämän päätöksen"];
  "First-tier Tribunal (verojaosto) (Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta)"->"Hyväksyi Cambridgen yliopiston vaatimuksen.";
  "Hyväksyi Cambridgen yliopiston vaatimuksen."->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (vero- ja sosiaalijaosto) (Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta)"->"Hyväksyi Cambridgen yliopiston vaatimuksen."[label="vahvisti"];
  "Hyväksyi Cambridgen yliopiston vaatimuksen."->"Kyseinen tuomioistuin katsoi, että mainitun rahaston hoidosta aiheutuneet maksut olivat Cambridgen yliopiston liiketoimintaan liittyviä tarpeita koskevia kuluja ja että tällä perusteella ne olivat osa yliopiston yleiskustannuksia.."[dir=none];
  "verohallinto"->"Court of Appeal (Englannin ja Walesin) (siviiliasioiden osasto) (Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta)"[label="Cambridgen yliopisto riitautti tämän päätöksen"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Management costs of an endowment fund that makes investments with the aim of financing the whole of the taxable person’s output transactions — Overheads.
Case C-316/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Universitetet i Cambridge överklagade skattemyndighetens beslut till First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (förstainstansdomstolen (skatteavdelningen), Förenade kungariket). Då förstainstansdomstolen fann att avgifterna för förvaltningen av den berörda fonden utgjorde kostnader för den ekonomiska verksamheten vid universitetet i Cambridge, och att de i denna egenskap utgjorde en del av universitetets allmänna omkostnader, slog den fast att universitetet i Cambridge skulle medges det yrkade avdraget. Efter det att Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (Överdomstolen (skatte- och finansavdelningen, Förenade kungariket)) fastställt denna bedömning överklagade skattemyndigheten avgörandet från den sistnämnda domstolen till Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (Appellationsdomstolen (för England och Wales) (avdelningen för tvistemål och förvaltningsmål), Förenade kungariket).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "University of Cambridge"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "skattemyndigheten"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "First-tier Tribunal (skatteavdelningen) (Förenade kungariket)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upper Tribunal (Överdomstolen (skatte- och finansavdelningen, Förenade kungariket)) (Förenade kungariket)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appeal (England och Wales) (avdelningen för tvistemål och förvaltningsmål) (Förenade kungariket)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "University of Cambridge"->"First-tier Tribunal (skatteavdelningen) (Förenade kungariket)"[label="Universitetet i Cambridge överklagade skattemyndighetens beslut"];
  "First-tier Tribunal (skatteavdelningen) (Förenade kungariket)"->"medges det yrkade avdraget";
  "medges det yrkade avdraget"->"University of Cambridge";
  "Upper Tribunal (Överdomstolen (skatte- och finansavdelningen, Förenade kungariket)) (Förenade kungariket)"->"medges det yrkade avdraget"[label="fastställt"];
  "medges det yrkade avdraget"->"Avgifterna för förvaltningen av den berörda fonden utgjorde kostnader för den ekonomiska verksamheten vid universitetet i Cambridge, och att de i denna egenskap utgjorde en del av universitetets allmänna omkostnader.."[dir=none];
  "skattemyndigheten"->"Court of Appeal (England och Wales) (avdelningen för tvistemål och förvaltningsmål) (Förenade kungariket)"[label="överklagade skattemyndighetens beslut"];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

Във връзка с първото от тях за участие в грабеж на банка тя посочва, че българският съд отказва да задържи под стража г‑н Милев, тъй като показанията на основния свидетел на обвинението, г‑н BP, са недостоверни. Все още не е постановен акт по същество по това дело.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "българският съд"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "българският съд"->"отказва да задържи под стража г‑н Милев";
  "отказва да задържи под стража г‑н Милев"->"първото от тях за участие в грабеж на банка";
  "отказва да задържи под стража г‑н Милев"->"Показанията на основния свидетел на обвинението, г‑н BP, са недостоверни.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Dicho órgano jurisdiccional indica que, en el primero de ellos, referido a un robo con violencia a un banco, un tribunal búlgaro rechazó decretar el ingreso en prisión preventiva del Sr. Milev, dada la falta de credibilidad del testimonio prestado por el principal testigo de cargo, el Sr. BP. Aún no ha recaído ninguna resolución judicial sobre el fondo en este asunto.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "tribunal búlgaro"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "tribunal búlgaro"->"un tribunal búlgaro rechazó decretar el ingreso en prisión preventiva del Sr. Milev";
  "un tribunal búlgaro rechazó decretar el ingreso en prisión preventiva del Sr. Milev"->"en el primero de ellos, referido a un robo con violencia a un banco";
  "un tribunal búlgaro rechazó decretar el ingreso en prisión preventiva del Sr. Milev"->"la falta de credibilidad del testimonio prestado por el principal testigo de cargo, el Sr. BP.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

Ohledně prvního z těchto řízení, jež se týká loupeže v bance, předkládající soud uvádí, že bulharský soud odmítl vzít E. Mileva do vazby vzhledem k tomu, že výpověď hlavního svědka, BP, nebyla věrohodná. V této věci zatím nebylo vydáno žádné meritorní soudní rozhodnutí.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "bulharský soud"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "bulharský soud"->"odmítl vzít E. Mileva do vazby";
  "odmítl vzít E. Mileva do vazby"->"prvního z těchto řízení, jež se týká loupeže v bance";
  "odmítl vzít E. Mileva do vazby"->"výpověď hlavního svědka, BP, nebyla věrohodná.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

I den første af disse sager vedrørende et røveri af en bank har den forelæggende ret anført, at en bulgarsk ret afslog at varetægtsfængsle Emil Milev, fordi vidneudsagnene fra anklagemyndighedens hovedvidne, BP, ikke var troværdige. Der er endnu ikke blevet truffet nogen retslig afgørelse om realiteten i den nævnte sag.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "en bulgarsk ret"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "en bulgarsk ret"->"afslog at varetægtsfængsle Emil Milev";
  "afslog at varetægtsfængsle Emil Milev"->"I den første af disse sager vedrørende et røveri af en bank";
  "afslog at varetægtsfængsle Emil Milev"->"Vidneudsagnene fra anklagemyndighedens hovedvidne, BP, ikke var troværdige.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

Im ersten dieser Verfahren, das einen Bankraub betreffe, habe ein bulgarisches Gericht die Anordnung von Untersuchungshaft gegen Herrn Milev mit der Begründung abgelehnt, dass die Aussage des Hauptbelastungszeugen, Herrn BP, nicht glaubhaft sei. Eine gerichtliche Entscheidung in der Sache sei in diesem Verfahren noch nicht ergangen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "bulgarisches Gericht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "bulgarisches Gericht"->"die Anordnung von Untersuchungshaft gegen Herrn Milev mit der Begründung abgelehnt";
  "die Anordnung von Untersuchungshaft gegen Herrn Milev mit der Begründung abgelehnt"->"Im ersten dieser Verfahren, das einen Bankraub betreffe";
  "die Anordnung von Untersuchungshaft gegen Herrn Milev mit der Begründung abgelehnt"->"die Aussage des Hauptbelastungszeugen, Herrn BP, nicht glaubhaft sei.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Esimese kriminaalasja kohta, mis puudutab pangaröövi, täheldab ta, et Bulgaaria kohus keeldus E. Milevit vahistamast põhjusel, et põhitunnistaja BP ütlused ei olnud usaldusväärsed. Selles kohtuasjas ei ole veel tehtud mingit sisulist otsust.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Bulgaaria kohus"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Bulgaaria kohus"->"keeldus E. Milevit vahistamast";
  "keeldus E. Milevit vahistamast"->"Esimese kriminaalasja kohta, mis puudutab pangaröövi";
  "keeldus E. Milevit vahistamast"->"põhitunnistaja BP ütlused ei olnud usaldusväärsed.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στο πλαίσιο της πρώτης από τις διαδικασίες αυτές, η οποία αφορά ληστεία τράπεζας με χρήση βίας, το αιτούν δικαστήριο αρνήθηκε να θέσει τον ο E. Milev υπό προσωρινή κράτηση, για τον λόγο ότι οι καταθέσεις του BP, βασικού μάρτυρα κατηγορίας, δεν ήταν αξιόπιστες. Στην εν λόγω υπόθεση δεν έχει ακόμη εκδοθεί δικαστική απόφαση επί της ουσίας.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "δικαστήριο"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "δικαστήριο"->"το αιτούν δικαστήριο αρνήθηκε να θέσει τον ο E. Milev υπό προσωρινή κράτηση";
  "το αιτούν δικαστήριο αρνήθηκε να θέσει τον ο E. Milev υπό προσωρινή κράτηση"->"η πρώτης από τις διαδικασίες αυτές, η οποία αφορά ληστεία τράπεζας με χρήση βίας";
  "το αιτούν δικαστήριο αρνήθηκε να θέσει τον ο E. Milev υπό προσωρινή κράτηση"->"οι καταθέσεις του BP, βασικού μάρτυρα κατηγορίας, δεν ήταν αξιόπιστες.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

Dans la première de ces affaires, relative au vol avec violence d’une banque, elle indique qu’une juridiction bulgare a refusé de placer M. Milev en détention provisoire, au motif que les dépositions du principal témoin à charge, M. BP, n’étaient pas crédibles. Aucune décision juridictionnelle sur le fond n’a encore été rendue dans ladite affaire.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "juridiction bulgare"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "juridiction bulgare"->"a refusé de placer M. Milev en détention provisoire";
  "a refusé de placer M. Milev en détention provisoire"->"Dans la première de ces affaires, relative au vol avec violence d’une banque";
  "a refusé de placer M. Milev en détention provisoire"->"les dépositions du principal témoin à charge, M. BP, n’étaient pas crédibles.."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of pre-trial detention.
Case C-310/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

On navodi da je u prvom od tih predmeta, koji se odnosi na razbojništvo banke, bugarski sud odbio E. Milevu odrediti istražni zatvor s obrazloženjem da iskazi glavnog svjedoka optužbe, BP‑a, nisu vjerodostojni. U navedenom predmetu još nije donesena nikakva sudska odluka o meritumu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "bugarski sud"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "bugarski sud"->"odbio E. Milevu odrediti istražni zatvor";
  "odbio E. Milevu odrediti istražni zatvor"->"U prvom od tih predmeta, koji se odnosi na razbojništvo banke";
  "odbio E. Milevu odrediti istražni zatvor"->"iskazi glavnog svjedoka optužbe, BP‑a, nisu vjerodostojni.."[dir=none];
    
    
}