mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

RO tika aizturēts un viņam tika piemērots pirmstiesas apcietinājums Īrijā 2016. gada 3. februārī. No šī datuma viņš atrodas pirmstiesas apcietinājumā šajā dalībvalstī, pamatojoties uz diviem Eiropas apcietināšanas orderiem, kuri pieņemti attiecībā uz viņu.
RO cēla iebildumus par viņa izdošanu Apvienotajai Karalistei, pamatojoties it īpaši uz šīs dalībvalsts izstāšanos no Savienības un uz 1950. gada 4. novembrī parakstītās Eiropas Cilvēktiesību un pamatbrīvību konvencijas 3. pantu (turpmāk tekstā – “ECPAK”), apgalvojot, ka pret viņu varētu tikt īstenota necilvēcīga un pazemojoša izturēšanās, ja viņš tiktu turēts ieslodzījumā Magaberijas [Maghaberry] cietumā Ziemeļīrijā.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "diviem Eiropas apcietināšanas orderiem"[shape=trapezium];
  "šīs dalībvalsts izstāšanos no Savienības un uz 1950. gada 4. novembrī parakstītās Eiropas Cilvēktiesību un pamatbrīvību konvencijas 3. pantu"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "diviem Eiropas apcietināšanas orderiem"->"tika aizturēts un viņam tika piemērots pirmstiesas apcietinājums 03/02/2016";
  "tika aizturēts un viņam tika piemērots pirmstiesas apcietinājums 03/02/2016"->"RO";
  "RO"->"RO cēla iebildumus par viņa izdošanu Apvienotajai Karalistei"[dir=none];
  "RO cēla iebildumus par viņa izdošanu Apvienotajai Karalistei"->"šīs dalībvalsts izstāšanos no Savienības un uz 1950. gada 4. novembrī parakstītās Eiropas Cilvēktiesību un pamatbrīvību konvencijas 3. pantu"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2016 m. vasario 3 d. RO buvo sulaikytas ir suimtas Airijoje. Nuo tos dienos jis tebėra suimtas šioje valstybėje narėje remiantis dviem dėl jo išduotais Europos arešto orderiais.
RO pateikė prieštaravimus dėl jo perdavimo Jungtinei Karalystei, grįsdamas juos visų pirma šios valstybės narės išstojimu iš Sąjungos ir Europos žmogaus teisių ir pagrindinių laisvių apsaugos konvencijos, pasirašytos Romoje 1950 m. lapkričio 4 d. (toliau – EŽTK), 3 straipsniu, ir tvirtino, kad galėtų patirti nežmonišką ir žeminantį elgesį, jeigu būtų kalinamas Maghaberry kalėjime Šiaurės Airijoje.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dviem dėl jo išduotais Europos arešto orderiais"[shape=trapezium];
  "šios valstybės narės išstojimu iš Sąjungos ir Europos žmogaus teisių ir pagrindinių laisvių apsaugos konvencijos, pasirašytos Romoje 1950 m. lapkričio 4 d. (toliau – EŽTK), 3 straipsniu"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "dviem dėl jo išduotais Europos arešto orderiais"->"sulaikytas ir suimtas 03/02/2016";
  "sulaikytas ir suimtas 03/02/2016"->"RO";
  "RO"->"pateikė prieštaravimus dėl jo perdavimo Jungtinei Karalystei"[dir=none];
  "pateikė prieštaravimus dėl jo perdavimo Jungtinei Karalystei"->"šios valstybės narės išstojimu iš Sąjungos ir Europos žmogaus teisių ir pagrindinių laisvių apsaugos konvencijos, pasirašytos Romoje 1950 m. lapkričio 4 d. (toliau – EŽTK), 3 straipsniu"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

RO‑t 2016. február 3‑án Írországban előzetes letartóztatásba helyezték. Ezen időpont óta továbbra is előzetes letartóztatásban van e tagállamban az ellene kibocsátott két európai elfogatóparancs alapján.
RO kifogásokat terjesztett elő az Egyesült Királyságba történő átadásával szemben, melyeket többek között az említett tagállamnak az Európai Unióból való kilépésére, valamint az emberi jogok és alapvető szabadságok védelméről szóló, 1950. november 4‑én Rómában aláírt európai egyezmény (kihirdette: az 1993. évi XXXI. tv.; a továbbiakban: EJEE) 3. cikkére alapított, arra hivatkozva, hogy abban az esetben, ha az észak‑írországi Maghaberry börtönben kerül fogva tartásra, embertelen és megalázó bánásmódnak lehet kitéve.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "két európai elfogatóparancs"[shape=trapezium];
  "az említett tagállamnak az Európai Unióból való kilépésére, valamint az emberi jogok és alapvető szabadságok védelméről szóló, 1950. november 4‑én Rómában aláírt európai egyezmény 3. cikkére"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "két európai elfogatóparancs"->"előzetes letartóztatásba helyezték 03/02/2016";
  "előzetes letartóztatásba helyezték 03/02/2016"->"RO";
  "RO"->"RO kifogásokat terjesztett elő az Egyesült Királyságba történő átadásával szemben,"[dir=none];
  "RO kifogásokat terjesztett elő az Egyesült Királyságba történő átadásával szemben,"->"az említett tagállamnak az Európai Unióból való kilépésére, valamint az emberi jogok és alapvető szabadságok védelméről szóló, 1950. november 4‑én Rómában aláírt európai egyezmény 3. cikkére"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

RO ġie arrestat u tqiegħed taħt arrest preventiv fl-Irlanda fit-3 ta’ Frar 2016. Sa minn dakinhar, huwa għadu taħt arrest preventiv f’dan l-Istat Membru, taħt żewġ mandati ta’ arrest Ewropej adottati kontrih.
RO qajjem oġġezzjonijet fir-rigward tal-konsenja tiegħu lir-Renju Unit ibbażati, b’mod partikolari, fuq l-irtirar ta’ dan l-Istat Membru mill-Unjoni u fuq l-Artikolu 3 tal-Konvenzjoni Ewropea għall-Protezzjoni tad-Drittijiet tal-Bniedem u tal-Libertajiet Fundamentali, iffirmata f’Ruma fl-4 ta’ Novembru 1950 (iktar ’il quddiem il-“KEDB”), billi allega li jista’ jkun suġġett għal trattament inuman u degradanti jekk jintbagħat il-ħabs ta’ Maghaberry fl-Irlanda ta’ Fuq.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "żewġ mandati ta’ arrest Ewropej"[shape=trapezium];
  "l-irtirar ta’ dan l-Istat Membru mill-Unjoni u fuq l-Artikolu 3 tal-Konvenzjoni Ewropea għall-Protezzjoni tad-Drittijiet tal-Bniedem u tal-Libertajiet Fundamentali"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "żewġ mandati ta’ arrest Ewropej"->"ġie arrestat u tqiegħed taħt arrest preventiv 03/02/2016";
  "ġie arrestat u tqiegħed taħt arrest preventiv 03/02/2016"->"RO";
  "RO"->"qajjem oġġezzjonijet fir-rigward tal-konsenja tiegħu lir-Renju Unit"[dir=none];
  "qajjem oġġezzjonijet fir-rigward tal-konsenja tiegħu lir-Renju Unit"->"l-irtirar ta’ dan l-Istat Membru mill-Unjoni u fuq l-Artikolu 3 tal-Konvenzjoni Ewropea għall-Protezzjoni tad-Drittijiet tal-Bniedem u tal-Libertajiet Fundamentali"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 3 februari 2016 is RO in Ierland aangehouden en in voorlopige hechtenis genomen. Sindsdien is hij in deze lidstaat in voorlopige hechtenis gebleven op basis van de twee Europese aanhoudingsbevelen die tegen hem zijn uitgevaardigd.
RO heeft tegen zijn overlevering aan het Verenigd Koninkrijk bezwaar gemaakt, onder meer op basis van de terugtrekking van deze lidstaat uit de Unie en artikel 3 van het op 4 november 1950 te Rome ondertekende Europees Verdrag tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens en de fundamentele vrijheden (hierna: „EVRM”). Daarbij voerde hij aan dat hij mogelijkerwijs onmenselijke en vernederende behandelingen zou ondergaan indien hij zou worden opgesloten in de gevangenis van Maghaberry in Noord-Ierland.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "twee Europese aanhoudingsbevelen"[shape=trapezium];
  "de terugtrekking van deze lidstaat uit de Unie en artikel 3 van het Europees Verdrag tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens en de fundamentele vrijheden"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "twee Europese aanhoudingsbevelen"->"aangehouden en in voorlopige hechtenis genomen 03/02/2016";
  "aangehouden en in voorlopige hechtenis genomen 03/02/2016"->"RO";
  "RO"->"RO heeft tegen zijn overlevering aan het Verenigd Koninkrijk bezwaar gemaakt"[dir=none];
  "RO heeft tegen zijn overlevering aan het Verenigd Koninkrijk bezwaar gemaakt"->"de terugtrekking van deze lidstaat uit de Unie en artikel 3 van het Europees Verdrag tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens en de fundamentele vrijheden"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

RO został zatrzymany i tymczasowo aresztowany w Irlandii w dniu 3 lutego 2016 r. Od tamtej pory przebywa on w tym państwie członkowskim w areszcie śledczym na podstawie wydanych wobec niego dwóch europejskich nakazów aresztowania.
W odniesieniu do przekazania go Zjednoczonemu Królestwu RO podniósł zarzuty dotyczące w szczególności wystąpienia tego państwa z Unii oraz art. 3 europejskiej Konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności, podpisanej w Rzymie w dniu 4 listopada 1950 r. (zwanej dalej „EKPC”), wskazując, że mógłby zostać poddany nieludzkiemu i poniżającemu traktowaniu, gdyby został osadzony w zakładzie karnym w Maghaberry w Irlandii Północnej.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dwa europejskie nakazy aresztowania"[shape=trapezium];
  "wystąpienia tego państwa z Unii oraz art. 3 europejskiej Konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "dwa europejskie nakazy aresztowania"->"został zatrzymany i tymczasowo aresztowany 03/02/2016";
  "został zatrzymany i tymczasowo aresztowany 03/02/2016"->"RO";
  "RO"->"Podniósł zarzuty dotyczące przekazania go Zjednoczonemu Królestwu"[dir=none];
  "Podniósł zarzuty dotyczące przekazania go Zjednoczonemu Królestwu"->"wystąpienia tego państwa z Unii oraz art. 3 europejskiej Konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

RO foi detido e ficou em prisão preventiva na Irlanda, em 3 de fevereiro de 2016. Desde essa data, continua em prisão preventiva neste Estado‑Membro, ao abrigo dos dois mandados de detenção europeus emitidos contra ele.
RO apresentou objeções à sua entrega ao Reino Unido, com base, designadamente, na saída deste Estado‑Membro da União e no artigo 3.o da Convenção Europeia para a Proteção dos Direitos do Homem e das Liberdades Fundamentais, assinada em Roma, em 4 de novembro de 1950 (a seguir «CEDH»), alegando que poderia sofrer tratamentos desumanos ou degradantes se ficasse detido na prisão de Maghaberry, na Irlanda do Norte.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dois mandados de detenção europeus"[shape=trapezium];
  "a saída deste Estado‑Membro da União e no artigo 3.o da Convenção Europeia para a Proteção dos Direitos do Homem e das Liberdades Fundamentais"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "dois mandados de detenção europeus"->"FOI detido e ficou em prisão preventiva 03/02/2016";
  "FOI detido e ficou em prisão preventiva 03/02/2016"->"RO";
  "RO"->"apresentou objeções à sua entrega ao Reino Unido"[dir=none];
  "apresentou objeções à sua entrega ao Reino Unido"->"a saída deste Estado‑Membro da União e no artigo 3.o da Convenção Europeia para a Proteção dos Direitos do Homem e das Liberdades Fundamentais"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

RO a fost arestat și a fost plasat în arest preventiv în Irlanda la 3 februarie 2016. De la această dată, el a rămas în arest preventiv în acest stat membru, în temeiul celor două mandate europene de arestare adoptate împotriva sa.
RO a ridicat obiecții cu privire la predarea sa în Regatul Unit întemeiate printre altele pe retragerea acestui stat membru din Uniune și pe articolul 3 din Convenția europeană pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, semnată la Roma la 4 noiembrie 1950 (denumită în continuare „CEDO”), susținând că ar putea suferi tratamente inumane și degradante dacă ar fi încarcerat în închisoarea din Maghaberry în Irlanda de Nord.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cele două mandate europene de arestare"[shape=trapezium];
  "retragerea acestui stat membru din Uniune și pe articolul 3 din Convenția europeană pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "cele două mandate europene de arestare"->"a fost arestat și a fost plasat în arest preventiv 03/02/2016";
  "a fost arestat și a fost plasat în arest preventiv 03/02/2016"->"RO";
  "RO"->"a ridicat obiecții cu privire la predarea sa în Regatul Unit"[dir=none];
  "a ridicat obiecții cu privire la predarea sa în Regatul Unit"->"retragerea acestui stat membru din Uniune și pe articolul 3 din Convenția europeană pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

RO bol zadržaný a vzatý do väzby v Írsku 3. februára 2016. Od tohto dňa je naďalej vo väzbe v tomto členskom štáte na základe dvoch európskych zatykačov, ktoré naňho boli vydané.
RO vzniesol námietky proti svojmu odovzdaniu do Spojeného kráľovstva založené najmä na vystúpení tohto členského štátu z Únie a na článku 3 Európskeho dohovoru o ochrane ľudských práv a základných slobôd, podpísaného v Ríme 4. novembra 1950 (ďalej len „EDĽP“) a uviedol, že by mohol byť vystavený neľudskému a ponižujúcemu zaobchádzaniu, ak by bol uväznený vo väznici v Maghaberry v Severnom Írsku.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dvoch európskych zatykačov"[shape=trapezium];
  "vystúpení tohto členského štátu z Únie a na článku 3 Európskeho dohovoru o ochrane ľudských práv a základných slobôd"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "dvoch európskych zatykačov"->"bol zadržaný a vzatý do väzby 03/02/2016";
  "bol zadržaný a vzatý do väzby 03/02/2016"->"RO";
  "RO"->"RO vzniesol námietky proti svojmu odovzdaniu do Spojeného kráľovstva"[dir=none];
  "RO vzniesol námietky proti svojmu odovzdaniu do Spojeného kráľovstva"->"vystúpení tohto členského štátu z Únie a na článku 3 Európskeho dohovoru o ochrane ľudských práv a základných slobôd"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Osebi RO je bila 3. februarja 2016 odvzeta prostost in odrejen pripor na Irskem. Od takrat je v priporu v tej državi članici na podlagi dveh evropskih nalogov za prijetje, izdanih zoper njo.
Oseba RO je ugovore zoper svojo predajo Združenemu kraljestvu utemeljila med drugim z izstopom te države članice iz Unije in s členom 3 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, podpisane v Rimu 4. novembra 1950 (v nadaljevanju: EKČP), in trdila, da bi lahko bila izpostavljena nečloveškemu in ponižujočemu ravnanju, če bi bila zaprta v zaporu Maghaberry na Severnem Irskem.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dveh evropskih nalogov za prijetje"[shape=trapezium];
  "izstopom te države članice iz Unije in s členom 3 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "dveh evropskih nalogov za prijetje"->"Odvzeta prostost in odrejen pripor 03/02/2016";
  "Odvzeta prostost in odrejen pripor 03/02/2016"->"RO";
  "RO"->"Oseba RO je ugovore zoper svojo predajo Združenemu kraljestvu utemeljila med drugim z izstopom te države članice iz Unije in s členom 3 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, podpisane v Rimu 4. novembra 1950 (v nadaljevanju: EKČP), in trdila, da bi lahko bila izpostavljena nečloveškemu in ponižujočemu ravnanju, če bi bila zaprta v zaporu Maghaberry na Severnem Irskem."[dir=none];
  "Oseba RO je ugovore zoper svojo predajo Združenemu kraljestvu utemeljila med drugim z izstopom te države članice iz Unije in s členom 3 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, podpisane v Rimu 4. novembra 1950 (v nadaljevanju: EKČP), in trdila, da bi lahko bila izpostavljena nečloveškemu in ponižujočemu ravnanju, če bi bila zaprta v zaporu Maghaberry na Severnem Irskem."->"izstopom te države članice iz Unije in s členom 3 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

RO otettiin kiinni ja säilöön Irlannissa 3.2.2016. Hän on ollut tästä ajankohdasta lähtien säilöön otettuna kyseisessä jäsenvaltiossa kahden hänestä annetun eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen perusteella.
RO on vastustanut luovuttamistaan Yhdistyneeseen kuningaskuntaan muun muassa tämän jäsenvaltion unionista eroamisen sekä ihmisoikeuksien ja perusvapauksien suojaamiseksi tehdyn Roomassa 4.11.1950 allekirjoitetun yleissopimuksen (jäljempänä Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimus) 3 artiklan perusteella ja väittänyt voivansa joutua kokemaan epäinhimillistä ja halventavaa kohtelua, jos hänet suljettaisiin Maghaberryn vankilaan Pohjois-Irlannissa.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "kahden hänestä annetun eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[shape=trapezium];
  "Yhdistyneeseen kuningaskuntaan muun muassa tämän jäsenvaltion unionista eroamisen sekä ihmisoikeuksien ja perusvapauksien suojaamiseksi tehdyn Roomassa 4.11.1950 allekirjoitetun yleissopimuksen (jäljempänä Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimus) 3 artiklan perusteella"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "kahden hänestä annetun eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"->"Otettiin kiinni ja säilöön 03/02/2016";
  "Otettiin kiinni ja säilöön 03/02/2016"->"RO";
  "RO"->"RO on vastustanut luovuttamistaan Yhdistyneeseen kuningaskuntaan"[dir=none];
  "RO on vastustanut luovuttamistaan Yhdistyneeseen kuningaskuntaan"->"Yhdistyneeseen kuningaskuntaan muun muassa tämän jäsenvaltion unionista eroamisen sekä ihmisoikeuksien ja perusvapauksien suojaamiseksi tehdyn Roomassa 4.11.1950 allekirjoitetun yleissopimuksen (jäljempänä Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimus) 3 artiklan perusteella"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

RO greps och häktades i Irland den 3 februari 2016. Han hålls sedan detta datum häktad i den medlemsstaten med stöd av de två europeiska arresteringsorder som utfärdats för honom.
RO motsatte sig ett överlämnande till Förenade kungariket, och åberopade därvid bland annat denna medlemsstats utträde ur unionen samt artikel 3 i Europeiska konventionen om skydd för de mänskliga rättigheterna och de grundläggande friheterna, som undertecknades i Rom den 4 november 1950 (nedan kallad Europakonventionen). Han hävdade att han skulle kunna utsättas för omänsklig och förnedrande behandling om han placerades i fängelset Maghaberry på Nordirland.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de två europeiska arresteringsorder"[shape=trapezium];
  "denna medlemsstats utträde ur unionen samt artikel 3 i Europeiska konventionen om skydd för de mänskliga rättigheterna och de grundläggande friheterna"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "de två europeiska arresteringsorder"->"grep och häktades 03/02/2016";
  "grep och häktades 03/02/2016"->"RO";
  "RO"->"RO motsatte sig ett överlämnande till Förenade kungariket"[dir=none];
  "RO motsatte sig ett överlämnande till Förenade kungariket"->"denna medlemsstats utträde ur unionen samt artikel 3 i Europeiska konventionen om skydd för de mänskliga rättigheterna och de grundläggande friheterna"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

След като разглежда твърденията на RO за отношението, на което може да бъде подложен в Северна Ирландия, с решение от 2 ноември 2017 г. High Court (Висш съд) приема, че е налице точна и актуална информация за условията на задържане в затвора „Мъгабри“, въз основа на която може да се смята, че поради уязвимото състояние на RO съществува реална опасност той да бъде подложен на нечовешко и унизително отношение. High Court (Висш съд) счита за необходимо с оглед на решение от 5 април 2016 г., Aranyosi и Căldăraru (C‑404/15 и C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), да поиска разяснения от органите на Обединеното кралство относно условията за задържане на RO, в случай че той бъде предаден.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Северна Ирландия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Северна Ирландия)"->"необходимо с оглед на решение от 5 април 2016 г., Aranyosi и Căldăraru (C‑404/15 и C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), да поиска разяснения от органите на Обединеното кралство"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Северна Ирландия)"->"решение от 2 ноември 2017 г. 02/11/2017";
  "решение от 2 ноември 2017 г. 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "решение от 2 ноември 2017 г. 02/11/2017"->"че поради уязвимото състояние на RO съществува реална опасност той да бъде подложен на нечовешко и унизително отношение.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Mediante su resolución de 2 de noviembre de 2017, la High Court (Tribunal Superior, Irlanda), tras examinar las alegaciones de RO relativas al trato al que podría verse sometido en Irlanda del Norte, consideró que existía información detallada y actualizada sobre las condiciones de internamiento en la prisión de Maghaberry que sustentaba el temor de que RO, por razón de su vulnerabilidad, fuera sometido efectivamente a tratos inhumanos o degradantes. Consideró necesario, a la luz de la sentencia de 5 de abril de 2016, Aranyosi y Căldăraru (C‑404/15 y C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), solicitar aclaraciones a las autoridades del Reino Unido en cuanto a las condiciones de internamiento de RO en caso de ser entregado.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irlanda)"->"Consideró necesario, solicitar aclaraciones a las autoridades del Reino Unido"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irlanda)"->"resolución de 2 de noviembre de 2017 02/11/2017";
  "resolución de 2 de noviembre de 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "resolución de 2 de noviembre de 2017 02/11/2017"->"existía información detallada y actualizada sobre las condiciones de internamiento en la prisión de Maghaberry que sustentaba el temor de que RO, por razón de su vulnerabilidad, fuera sometido efectivamente a tratos inhumanos o degradantes.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

Rozhodnutím ze dne 2. listopadu 2017 High Court (Vrchní soud, Irsko) nejprve přezkoumal tvrzení RO ohledně zacházení, jemuž by mohl být podroben v Severním Irsku, a dospěl k závěru, že na základě přesných a aktuálních informací o podmínkách ve věznici v Maghaberry existují důvody k domněnce, že by RO z důvodu jeho zranitelnosti skutečně hrozilo, že bude podroben nelidskému či ponižujícímu zacházení. S ohledem na rozsudek ze dne 5. dubna 2016, Aranyosi a Căldăraru (C‑404/15 a C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), považoval tento soud za nutné požádat orgány Spojeného království o doplňující informace o podmínkách věznění RO v případě jeho předání.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irsko)"->"nutné požádat orgány Spojeného království o doplňující informace"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irsko)"->"Rozhodnutím ze dne 2. listopadu 2017 High Court (Vrchní soud, Irsko) 02/11/2017";
  "Rozhodnutím ze dne 2. listopadu 2017 High Court (Vrchní soud, Irsko) 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "Rozhodnutím ze dne 2. listopadu 2017 High Court (Vrchní soud, Irsko) 02/11/2017"->"že by RO z důvodu jeho zranitelnosti skutečně hrozilo, že bude podroben nelidskému či ponižujícímu zacházení.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

Efter at have behandlet RO’s indsigelser vedrørende den behandling, som han ville kunne blive udsat for i Nordirland, fandt High Court (ret i første instans, Irland) ved afgørelse af 2. november 2017, at det i henhold til præcise og nylige oplysninger om forholdene under frihedsberøvelse i fængslet i Maghaberry var rimeligt at antage, at han pga. sin skrøbelighed løb en reel risiko for at blive udsat for umenneskelig og nedværdigende behandling. Den fandt det i lyset af dom af 5. april 2016, Aranyosi og Căldăraru (C-404/15 og C-659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), nødvendigt at anmode Det Forenede Kongeriges myndigheder om yderligere oplysninger vedrørende forholdene under RO’s frihedsberøvelse i tilfælde af overgivelse.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irland)"->"nødvendigt at anmode Det Forenede Kongeriges myndigheder om yderligere oplysninger"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irland)"->"afgørelse af 2. november 2017 02/11/2017";
  "afgørelse af 2. november 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "afgørelse af 2. november 2017 02/11/2017"->"han pga. sin skrøbelighed løb en reel risiko for at blive udsat for umenneskelig og nedværdigende behandling.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

In einer Entscheidung vom 2. November 2017 vertrat der High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof, Irland), nachdem er das Vorbringen von RO zu der ihm in Nordirland potenziell drohenden Behandlung geprüft hatte, die Ansicht, dass konkrete und aktuelle Informationen über die Haftbedingungen im Maghaberry-Gefängnis die Vermutung zuließen, dass RO wegen seines Gesundheitszustands Gefahr laufe, tatsächlich einer unmenschlichen oder erniedrigenden Behandlung ausgesetzt zu sein. Der High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) erachtete es angesichts des Urteils vom 5. April 2016, Aranyosi und Căldăraru (C‑404/15 und C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), für erforderlich, bei den Behörden des Vereinigten Königreichs um Aufklärung über die Haftbedingungen von RO im Fall der Übergabe zu ersuchen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irland)"->"für erforderlich, bei den Behörden des Vereinigten Königreichs um Aufklärung über die Haftbedingungen von RO im Fall der Übergabe zu ersuchen."[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irland)"->"Entscheidung vom 2. November 2017 02/11/2017";
  "Entscheidung vom 2. November 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "Entscheidung vom 2. November 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO wegen seines Gesundheitszustands Gefahr laufe, tatsächlich einer unmenschlichen oder erniedrigenden Behandlung ausgesetzt zu sein.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

High Court (kõrge kohus, Iirimaa), olles analüüsinud RO väiteid, et teda võib Põhja-Iirimaal ees oodata ebainimlik ja väärikust alandav kohtlemine, tegi 2. novembril 2017 otsuse, milles leidis, et konkreetse ja ajakohase teabe kohaselt Maghaberry vangla kinnipidamistingimuste kohta on alust arvata, et RO-l on oma nõrgestatud seisundi tõttu reaalne risk sattuda ebainimliku ja väärikust alandava kohtlemise ohvriks. High Court (kõrge kohus), arvestades 5. aprilli 2016. aasta kohtuotsust Aranyosi ja Căldăraru (C‑404/15 ja C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), pidas vajalikuks paluda Ühendkuningriigi ametivõimudelt selgitusi RO kinnipidamistingimuste kohta tema üleandmise korral.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Iirimaa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Iirimaa)"->"pidas vajalikuks paluda Ühendkuningriigi ametivõimudelt selgitusi RO kinnipidamistingimuste kohta"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Iirimaa)"->"2. novembril 2017 otsuse 02/11/2017";
  "2. novembril 2017 otsuse 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "2. novembril 2017 otsuse 02/11/2017"->"RO-l on oma nõrgestatud seisundi tõttu reaalne risk sattuda ebainimliku ja väärikust alandava kohtlemise ohvriks.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Με απόφαση της 2ας Νοεμβρίου 2017 το High Court (ανώτερο δικαστήριο, Ιρλανδία), αφού εξέτασε τους ισχυρισμούς του RO σχετικά με τη μεταχείριση που ενδεχομένως θα του επιφυλασσόταν στη Βόρεια Ιρλανδία, έκρινε ότι βάσει συγκεκριμένων και πρόσφατων πληροφοριών για τις συνθήκες κράτησης στη φυλακή του Maghaberry, θα μπορούσε ευλόγως να θεωρηθεί ότι λόγω της ευπάθειάς του ο RO διέτρεχε πραγματικό κίνδυνο να υποστεί απάνθρωπη ή εξευτελιστική μεταχείριση. Υπό το πρίσμα της απόφασης της 5ης Απριλίου 2016, Aranyosi και Căldăraru (C-404/15 και C-659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), το δικαστήριο αυτό έκρινε σκόπιμο να ζητήσει διευκρινίσεις από τις αρχές του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου σχετικά με τις συνθήκες κράτησης στις οποίες θα υποβαλλόταν ο RO σε περίπτωση παράδοσής του.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Ιρλανδία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Ιρλανδία)"->"σκόπιμο να ζητήσει διευκρινίσεις από τις αρχές του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Ιρλανδία)"->"απόφαση 02/11/2017";
  "απόφαση 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "απόφαση 02/11/2017"->"λόγω της ευπάθειάς του ο RO διέτρεχε πραγματικό κίνδυνο να υποστεί απάνθρωπη ή εξευτελιστική μεταχείριση.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

Par une décision du 2 novembre 2017, la High Court (Haute Cour, Irlande), après avoir examiné les allégations de RO relatives au traitement qu’il pourrait subir en Irlande du Nord, a considéré que, suivant des informations précises et récentes sur les conditions de détention dans la prison de Maghaberry, il était permis de penser que, en raison de sa fragilité, RO risquait réellement de subir des traitements inhumains ou dégradants. Elle a estimé nécessaire, à la lumière de l’arrêt du 5 avril 2016, Aranyosi et Căldăraru (C‑404/15 et C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), de demander des éclaircissements aux autorités du Royaume‑Uni sur les conditions de détention de RO en cas de remise.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irlande)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irlande)"->"nécessaire, de demander des éclaircissements aux autorités du Royaume‑Uni"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irlande)"->"une décision du 2 novembre 2017 02/11/2017";
  "une décision du 2 novembre 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "une décision du 2 novembre 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO risquait réellement de subir des traitements inhumains ou dégradants en raison de sa fragilité.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

U presudi od 2. studenoga 2017. High Court (Visoki sud, Irska), nakon što je razmotrio tvrdnje osobe R. O. u vezi s postupanjem kojem bi mogla biti izložena u Sjevernoj Irskoj, zaključio je na temelju konkretnih i ažuriranih informacija o pritvorskim uvjetima u zatvoru Maghaberry da se zbog njezine ranjivosti može pretpostaviti stvarna opasnost da bi osoba R. O. bila izložena nečovječnom ili ponižavajućem postupanju. Procijenio je da je s obzirom na presudu od 5. travnja 2016., Aranyosi i Căldăraru (C‑404/15 i C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), nužno zahtijevati pojašnjenja od tijela Ujedinjene Kraljevine o uvjetima pritvora osobe R. O. u slučaju predaje.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irska)"->"nužno zahtijevati pojašnjenja od tijela Ujedinjene Kraljevine"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irska)"->"presudi od 2. studenoga 2017. 02/11/2017";
  "presudi od 2. studenoga 2017. 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "presudi od 2. studenoga 2017. 02/11/2017"->"Zbog njezine ranjivosti može pretpostaviti stvarna opasnost da bi osoba R. O. bila izložena nečovječnom ili ponižavajućem postupanju.."[dir=none];

    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

Con decisione del 2 novembre 2017, la High Court (Alta Corte, Irlanda), dopo aver esaminato le asserzioni di RO relative al trattamento che avrebbe potuto subire in Irlanda del Nord, ha dichiarato che, sulla base di informazioni specifiche e aggiornate riguardanti le condizioni di detenzione nella prigione di Maghaberry, si poteva temere che RO, in ragione dei suoi problemi di salute, rischiasse concretamente di subire trattamenti inumani e degradanti. Essa ha ritenuto necessario, alla luce della sentenza del 5 aprile 2016, Aranyosi e Căldăraru (C‑404/15 e C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), chiedere chiarimenti alle autorità del Regno Unito sulle condizioni di detenzione di RO in caso di consegna.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irlanda)"->"chiedere chiarimenti alle autorità del Regno Unito"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irlanda)"->"decisione del 2 novembre 2017 02/11/2017";
  "decisione del 2 novembre 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "decisione del 2 novembre 2017 02/11/2017"->"si poteva temere che RO, in ragione dei suoi problemi di salute, rischiasse concretamente di subire trattamenti inumani e degradanti.."[dir=none];

    
}