mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

T. Vandenbon trabalhava para a WTG Retail como gerente de uma das lojas de vestuário exploradas por essa empresa. Nessa qualidade, em 24 de junho de 2015, T. Vandenbon fez uma entrevista de recrutamento a J. Hakelbracht, para um lugar de vendedora, a prover a partir de 1 agosto de 2015. Nessa entrevista, J. Hakelbracht informou que estava grávida de três meses.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="trabalhava para a WTG Retail como gerente de uma das lojas de vestuário exploradas por essa empresa. Nessa qualidade, em 24 de junho de 2015, T. Vandenbon fez uma entrevista de recrutamento a J. Hakelbracht, para um lugar de vendedora, a prover a partir de 1 agosto de 2015."dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[label="entrevista de recrutamento"];
  "T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"grávida de três meses"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Doamna Vandenbon era angajată de WTG Retail în calitate de administratoare a unuia dintre magazinele de îmbrăcăminte exploatate de această întreprindere. În această calitate, la 24 iunie 2015, doamna Vandenbon a ținut un interviu de angajare cu doamna Hakelbracht pentru un post de vânzătoare care urma să fie ocupat începând de la 1 august 2015. În cadrul acestui interviu, doamna Hakelbracht a menționat că era gravidă în luna a treia.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Doamna Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Doamna Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"Doamna Vandenbon"[label="angajare"dir=none];
  "Doamna Vandenbon"->"Doamna Hakelbracht"[label="interviu de angajare"];
  "Doamna Hakelbracht"->"gravidă în luna a treia"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Pani Vandenbonová bola zamestnaná vo WTG Retail ako manažérka jedného z obchodov s oblečením prevádzkovaných touto spoločnosťou. V tomto postavení pani Vandenbonová 24. júna 2015 uskutočnila prijímací pohovor s pani Hakelbrachtovou na pozíciu predavačky od 1. augusta 2015. Počas tohto pohovoru pani Hakelbrachtová uviedla, že je v treťom mesiaci tehotenstva.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Pani Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Pani Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"Pani Vandenbon"[label="zamestnaná vo WTG Retail"dir=none];
  "Pani Vandenbon"->"Pani Hakelbracht"[label="prijímací pohovor"];
  "Pani Hakelbracht"->"v treťom mesiaci tehotenstva"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

T. Vandenbon je bila pri WTG Retail zaposlena kot poslovodja ene od trgovin z oblačili, ki jih upravlja ta družba. V tej vlogi je T. Vandenbon 24. junija 2015 z J. Hakelbracht opravila razgovor za delovno mesto prodajalke od 1. avgusta 2015 dalje. Med tem razgovorom je J. Hakelbracht navedla, da je noseča tri mesece.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="zaposlena kot poslovodja"dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[label="razgovor za delovno mesto"];
  "T. Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"noseča tri mesece"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Vandenbon työskenteli WTG Retailin palveluksessa myymälänhoitajana yhdessä kyseisen yrityksen vaatemyymälöistä. Tässä ominaisuudessaan Vandenbon teki 24.6.2015 Hakelbrachtin kanssa työhönottohaastattelun, joka koski 1.8.2015 alkaen täytettävää myyjän tehtävää. Tässä haastattelussa Hakelbracht ilmoitti olevansa kolmannella kuulla raskaana.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="palveluksessa"dir=none];
  "Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[label="työhönottohaastattelun"];
  "Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"kolmannella kuulla raskaana"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Tine Vandenbon var anställd av WTG Retail i egenskap av föreståndare för en av de klädesbutiker som företaget driver. I denna egenskap höll Tine Vandenbon den 24 juni 2015 en anställningsintervju med Jamina Hakelbracht för en tjänst som försäljerska. Tjänsten skulle tillsättas från och med den 1 augusti 2015. Vid intervjun berättade Jamina Hakelbracht att hon var gravid i tredje månaden.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="anställningsintervju"dir=none];
  "Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"[label="anställningsintervju"];
  "Tine Vandenbon Hakelbracht"->"gravid i tredje månaden"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: English

On 5 July 2015, Ms Vandenbon informed WTG Retail that she had found a suitable candidate in the person of Ms Hakelbracht. However, the human resources manager of that company informed her, by email of 6 July 2015, that it did not want to hire Ms Hakelbracht because of her pregnancy.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Ms Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "WTG Retail"->"Email of 06/07/2015";
   "Email of 06/07/2015"->"Ms Vandenbon";
   "Email of 06/07/2015"->"It did not want to hire Ms Hakelbracht because of her pregnancy."[dir=none];
   "Ms Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="Informed a suitable candidate was Ms Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 5 юли 2015 г. г‑жа Vandenbon уведомява WTG Retail, че е намерила подходящ кандидат в лицето на г‑жа Hakelbracht. С имейл от 6 юли 2015 г. отговорникът за човешките ресурси на това предприятие обаче я уведомява, че не желае да наеме на работа г‑жа Hakelbracht поради бременността ѝ.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "г‑жа Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"имейл от 06/07/2015";
  "имейл от 06/07/2015"->"г‑жа Vandenbon";
  "имейл от 06/07/2015"->"не желае да наеме на работа г‑жа Hakelbracht поради бременността ѝ.."[dir=none];
  "г‑жа Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="уведомява WTG Retail, че е намерила подходящ кандидат в лицето на г‑жа Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 5 de julio de 2015, la Sra. Vandenbon informó a WTG Retail de que había encontrado una candidata adecuada en la persona de la Sra. Hakelbracht. No obstante, la responsable de recursos humanos de esa empresa le hizo saber, mediante correo electrónico de 6 de julio de 2015, su intención de no contratar a la Sra. Hakelbracht debido a su embarazo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sra. Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"correo electrónico de 06/07/2015";
  "correo electrónico de 06/07/2015"->"Sra. Vandenbon";
  "correo electrónico de 06/07/2015"->"su intención de no contratar a la Sra. Hakelbracht debido a su embarazo.."[dir=none];
  "Sra. Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dne 5. července 2015 informovala T. Vandenbon společnost WTG Retail, že v osobě J. Hakelbracht našla vhodnou uchazečku. Odpovědná pracovnice oddělení lidských zdrojů tohoto podniku jí však elektronickou poštou ze dne 6. července 2015 sdělila, že nechce J. Hakelbracht zaměstnat z důvodu jejího těhotenství.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"elektronickou poštu ze dne 6. července 2015 06/07/2015";
  "elektronickou poštu ze dne 6. července 2015 06/07/2015"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "elektronickou poštu ze dne 6. července 2015 06/07/2015"->"že nechce J. Hakelbracht zaměstnat z důvodu jejího těhotenství.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="Dne 5. července 2015 informovala T. Vandenbon společnost WTG Retail, že v osobě J. Hakelbracht našla vhodnou uchazečku. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den 5. juli 2015 informerede Tine Vandenbon WTG Retail om, at Jamina Hakelbracht var en passende ansøger til stillingen. Den ansvarlige for menneskelige ressourcer i denne virksomhed fortalte hende imidlertid ved e-mail af 6. juli 2015, at Jamina Hakelbracht ikke skulle ansættes på grund af hendes graviditet.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"e-mail af 6. juli 2015 06/07/2015";
  "e-mail af 6. juli 2015 06/07/2015"->"Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "e-mail af 6. juli 2015 06/07/2015"->"Jamina Hakelbracht ikke skulle ansættes på grund af hendes graviditet.."[dir=none];
  "Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="Jamina Hakelbracht var en passende ansøger Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: German

Am 5. Juli 2015 informierte Frau Vandenbon WTG Retail darüber, dass sie in der Person von Frau Hakelbracht eine geeignete Kandidatin gefunden habe. Die für Personal Verantwortliche dieses Unternehmens ließ sie mit E‑Mail vom 6. Juli 2015 aber wissen, dass sie Frau Hakelbracht wegen deren Schwangerschaft nicht einstellen wolle.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Frau Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"E‑Mail vom 6. Juli 2015 06/07/2015";
  "E‑Mail vom 6. Juli 2015 06/07/2015"->"Frau Vandenbon";
  "E‑Mail vom 6. Juli 2015 06/07/2015"->"dass sie Frau Hakelbracht wegen deren Schwangerschaft nicht einstellen wolle.."[dir=none];
  "Frau Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="Frau Hakelbracht eine geeignete Kandidatin Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

T. Vandenbon teatas 5. juulil 2015 WTG Retailile, et on J. Hakelbrachti näol leidnud sobiva kandidaadi. Selle äriühingu personalihalduse eest vastutav töötaja andis talle 6. juuli 2015. aasta elektronkirjaga sellegipoolest teada, et ei soovi J. Hakelbrachti tööle võtta, sest viimane on rase.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"6. juuli 2015. aasta elektronkirjaga 06/07/2015";
  "6. juuli 2015. aasta elektronkirjaga 06/07/2015"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "6. juuli 2015. aasta elektronkirjaga 06/07/2015"->"ei soovi J. Hakelbrachti tööle võtta, sest viimane on rase.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="J. Hakelbrachti näol leidnud sobiva kandidaadi. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 5 Ιουλίου 2015, η Τ. Vandenbon γνωστοποίησε στη WTG Retail ότι θεωρούσε την J. Hakelbracht κατάλληλη υποψήφια. Ωστόσο, η υπεύθυνη ανθρώπινου δυναμικού της επιχείρησης αυτής την ενημέρωσε, με μήνυμα ηλεκτρονικού ταχυδρομείου της 6ης Ιουλίου 2015, ότι δεν ήθελε να προσλάβει την J. Hakelbracht λόγω της εγκυμοσύνης της.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Τ. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"6ης Ιουλίου 2015 06/07/2015";
  "6ης Ιουλίου 2015 06/07/2015"->"Τ. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "6ης Ιουλίου 2015 06/07/2015"->"δεν ήθελε να προσλάβει την J. Hakelbracht λόγω της εγκυμοσύνης της.."[dir=none];
  "Τ. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="Τ. Vandenbon γνωστοποίησε στη WTG Retail ότι θεωρούσε την J. Hakelbracht κατάλληλη υποψήφια. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: French

Le 5 juillet 2015, Mme Vandenbon a informé WTG Retail qu’elle avait trouvé une candidate appropriée en la personne de Mme Hakelbracht. Toutefois, la responsable des ressources humaines de cette entreprise lui a fait savoir, par courrier électronique du 6 juillet 2015, ne pas vouloir engager Mme Hakelbracht en raison de sa grossesse.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Mme Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"courrier électronique du 6 juillet 2015 06/07/2015";
  "courrier électronique du 6 juillet 2015 06/07/2015"->"Mme Vandenbon";
  "courrier électronique du 6 juillet 2015 06/07/2015"->"ne pas vouloir engager Mme Hakelbracht en raison de sa grossesse.."[dir=none];
  "Mme Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="a informé qu'elle avait trouvé une candidate appropriée en la personne de Mme Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

T. Vandenbon 5. srpnja 2015. priopćila je društvu WTG Retail da je J. Hakelbracht prikladna kandidatkinja. Međutim, elektroničkom poštom od 6. srpnja 2015. voditeljica ljudskih potencijala tog poduzeća povratno je obavijestila T. Vandenbon da ne želi zaposliti J. Hakelbracht zbog njezine trudnoće.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"elektroničkom poštom od 6. srpnja 2015. 06/07/2015";
  "elektroničkom poštom od 6. srpnja 2015. 06/07/2015"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "elektroničkom poštom od 6. srpnja 2015. 06/07/2015"->"ne želi zaposliti J. Hakelbracht zbog njezine trudnoće.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="J. Hakelbracht prikladna kandidatkinja. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 5 luglio 2015 la sig.ra Vandenbon ha informato la WTG Retail di aver trovato una candidata idonea nella persona della sig.ra Hakelbracht. Tuttavia, la responsabile delle risorse umane di tale impresa le ha comunicato, con messaggio di posta elettronica del 6 luglio 2015, di non voler assumere la sig.ra Hakelbracht a causa della sua gravidanza.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sig.ra Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"messaggio di posta elettronica 06/07/2015";
  "messaggio di posta elettronica 06/07/2015"->"sig.ra Vandenbon";
  "messaggio di posta elettronica 06/07/2015"->"di non voler assumere la sig.ra Hakelbracht a causa della sua gravidanza.."[dir=none];
  "sig.ra Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="ha informato la WTG Retail di aver trovato una candidata idonea nella persona della sig.ra Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

2015. gada 5. jūlijāT. Vandenbon informēja WTG Retail, ka viņa ir atradusi piemērotu kandidāti, proti, J. Hakelbracht. Taču šī uzņēmuma personāldaļas vadītājs ar 2015. gada 6. jūlija e‑pasta vēstuli viņai paziņoja, ka nevēlas pieņemt darbā J. Hakelbracht grūtniecības dēļ.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"2015. gada 6. jūlija e‑pasta vēstuli 06/07/2015";
  "2015. gada 6. jūlija e‑pasta vēstuli 06/07/2015"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "2015. gada 6. jūlija e‑pasta vēstuli 06/07/2015"->"nevēlas pieņemt darbā J. Hakelbracht grūtniecības dēļ.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="T. Vandenbon informēja WTG Retail, ka viņa ir atradusi piemērotu kandidāti, proti, J. Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2015 m. liepos 5 d. T. Vandenbon informavo WTG Retail, kad rado tinkamą kandidatę – J. Hakelbracht. Tačiau už žmogiškuosius išteklius šioje įmonėje atsakingas asmuo ją 2015 m. liepos 6 d. elektroniniu laišku informavo, kad nepageidauja įdarbinti J. Hakelbracht dėl jos nėštumo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"elektroniniu laišku 06/07/2015";
  "elektroniniu laišku 06/07/2015"->"J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon";
  "elektroniniu laišku 06/07/2015"->"Nepageidauja įdarbinti J. Hakelbracht dėl jos nėštumo.."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="Informavo, kad rado tinkamą kandidatę – J. Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2015. július 5‑én T. Vandenbon arról tájékoztatta a WTG Retailt, hogy J. Hakelbracht személyében megfelelő pályázót talált. Mindazonáltal e vállalkozás személyzeti ügyekért felelőse 2015. július 6‑i elektronikus levelében tudatta vele, hogy J. Hakelbrachtot terhessége miatt nem kívánja alkalmazni.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"2015. július 6‑i elektronikus levelében 06/07/2015";
  "2015. július 6‑i elektronikus levelében 06/07/2015"->"J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon";
  "2015. július 6‑i elektronikus levelében 06/07/2015"->"J. Hakelbrachtot terhessége miatt nem kívánja alkalmazni.."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="T. Vandenbon arról tájékoztatta a WTG Retailt, hogy J. Hakelbracht személyében megfelelő pályázót talált. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fil-5 ta’ Lulju 2015, T. Vandenbon għarrfet lil WTG Retail li kienet sabet kandidata xierqa fil-persuna ta’ J. Hakelbracht. Madankollu, il-kap tar-riżorsi umani ta’ din l-impriża informaha, b’posta elettronika tas-6 ta’ Lulju 2015, li ma riedx jimpjega lil J. Hakelbracht minħabba t-tqala tagħha.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"posta elettronika 06/07/2015";
  "posta elettronika 06/07/2015"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "posta elettronika 06/07/2015"->"ma riedx jimpjega lil J. Hakelbracht minħabba t-tqala tagħha.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="T. Vandenbon għarrfet lil WTG Retail li kienet sabet kandidata xierqa fil-persuna ta’ J. Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 5 juli 2015 stelde Vandenbon WTG Retail ervan in kennis dat zij in de persoon van Hakelbracht een geschikte sollicitante had gevonden. Het hoofd personeelszaken van die onderneming deelde haar bij e‑mail van 6 juli 2015 evenwel mee dat zij Hakelbracht wegens haar zwangerschap niet in dienst wilde nemen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"e‑mail van 6 juli 2015 06/07/2015";
  "e‑mail van 6 juli 2015 06/07/2015"->"Hakelbracht Vandenbon";
  "e‑mail van 6 juli 2015 06/07/2015"->"zij Hakelbracht wegens haar zwangerschap niet in dienst wilde nemen.."[dir=none];
  "Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="Hakelbracht een geschikte sollicitante had gevonden Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 5 lipca 2015 r. T. Vandenbon poinformowała WTG Retail, że znalazła odpowiednią kandydatkę w osobie J. Hakelbracht. Jednakże pocztą elektroniczną z dnia 6 lipca 2015 r kierowniczka ds. zasobów ludzkich w tym przedsiębiorstwie powiadomiła T. Vandenbon, że nie chce zatrudnić H. Hakelbracht ze względu na jej ciążę.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"pocztą elektroniczną z dnia 6 lipca 2015 r 06/07/2015";
  "pocztą elektroniczną z dnia 6 lipca 2015 r 06/07/2015"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "pocztą elektroniczną z dnia 6 lipca 2015 r 06/07/2015"->"nie chce zatrudnić H. Hakelbracht ze względu na jej ciążę.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="znalazła odpowiednią kandydatkę w osobie J. Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 5 de julho de 2015, T. Vandenbon informou a WTG Retail de que encontrara uma candidata adequada na pessoa de J. Hakelbracht. Todavia, a responsável pelos recursos humanos dessa empresa deu‑lhe conhecimento, por correio eletrónico de 6 de julho de 2015, de que não pretendia contratar J. Hakelbracht devido à sua gravidez.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"6 de julho de 2015 06/07/2015";
  "6 de julho de 2015 06/07/2015"->"J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon";
  "6 de julho de 2015 06/07/2015"->"não pretendia contratar J. Hakelbracht devido à sua gravidez.."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="informou a WTG Retail de que encontrara uma candidata adequada na pessoa de J. Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 5 iulie 2015, doamna Vandenbon a informat WTG Retail că a găsit o candidată corespunzătoare în persoana doamnei Hakelbracht. Cu toate acestea, inspectoarea de resurse umane din această întreprindere i‑a comunicat, prin e‑mailul din 6 iulie 2015, că nu dorea să o angajeze pe doamna Hakelbracht ca urmare a sarcinii sale.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "doamna Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"6 iulie 2015 06/07/2015";
  "6 iulie 2015 06/07/2015"->"doamna Vandenbon";
  "6 iulie 2015 06/07/2015"->"nu dorea să o angajeze pe doamna Hakelbracht ca urmare a sarcinii sale.."[dir=none];
  "doamna Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="Doamna Vandenbon a informat WTG Retail că a găsit o candidată corespunzătoare în persoana doamnei Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 5. júla 2015 pani Vandenbonová informovala WTG Retail, že našla vhodnú kandidátku v osobe pani Hakelbrachtovej. Vedúca oddelenia ľudských zdrojov tejto spoločnosti jej však e‑mailom zo 6. júla 2015 oznámila, že pani Hakelbrachtovú nechce zamestnať z dôvodu jej tehotenstva.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "pani Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"e‑mailom zo 6. júla 2015 06/07/2015";
  "e‑mailom zo 6. júla 2015 06/07/2015"->"pani Vandenbon";
  "e‑mailom zo 6. júla 2015 06/07/2015"->"že pani Hakelbrachtovú nechce zamestnať z dôvodu jej tehotenstva.."[dir=none];
  "pani Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="Našla vhodnú kandidátku v osobe pani Hakelbrachtovej. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

T. Vandenbon je družbo WTG Retail 5. julija 2015 obvestila, da je J. Hakelbracht primerna kandidatka. Vendar jo je vodja službe za človeške vire te družbe 6. julija 2015 po elektronski pošti obvestil, da J. Hakelbracht zaradi nosečnosti ne želi zaposliti.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"elektronski pošti 06/07/2015";
  "elektronski pošti 06/07/2015"->"J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon";
  "elektronski pošti 06/07/2015"->"J. Hakelbracht zaradi nosečnosti ne želi zaposliti.."[dir=none];
  "J. Hakelbracht Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="J. Hakelbracht primerna kandidatka. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Vandenbon ilmoitti 5.7.2015 WTG Retailille löytäneensä Hakelbrachtista tehtävään soveltuvan hakijan. Kyseisen yrityksen henkilöstöosaston vastaava ilmoitti kuitenkin hänelle sähköpostilla 6.7.2015, ettei Hakelbrachtia haluta ottaa palvelukseen tämän raskauden takia.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"sähköpostilla 06/07/2015";
  "sähköpostilla 06/07/2015"->"Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "sähköpostilla 06/07/2015"->"ettei Hakelbrachtia haluta ottaa palvelukseen tämän raskauden takia.."[dir=none];
  "Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="Vandenbon ilmoitti 5.7.2015 WTG Retailille löytäneensä Hakelbrachtista tehtävään soveltuvan hakijan. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Den 5 juli 2015 informerade Tine Vandenbon WTG Retail om att hon hade hittat en lämplig kandidat i Jamina Hakelbracht. Företagets personalchef meddelade dock, i e-postmeddelande av den 6 juli 2015, att hon inte önskade anställa Jamina Hakelbracht på grund av att hon var gravid.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"e-postmeddelande av den 6 juli 2015 06/07/2015";
  "e-postmeddelande av den 6 juli 2015 06/07/2015"->"Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "e-postmeddelande av den 6 juli 2015 06/07/2015"->"hon inte önskade anställa Jamina Hakelbracht på grund av att hon var gravid.."[dir=none];
  "Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="informerade Tine Vandenbon WTG Retail om att hon hade hittat en lämplig kandidat i Jamina Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: English

On 5 July 2015, Ms Vandenbon informed WTG Retail that she had found a suitable candidate in the person of Ms Hakelbracht. However, the human resources manager of that company informed her, by email of 6 July 2015, that it did not want to hire Ms Hakelbracht because of her pregnancy.
By email dated 7 July 2015, Ms Vandenbon replied to WTG Retail that such a refusal to hire due to pregnancy was prohibited by law. However, on 12 August 2015, she learned that WTG Retail confirmed the refusal to recruit Ms Hakelbracht for that same reason.
On the same day, Ms Vandenbon informed Ms Hakelbracht that her candidacy had not been accepted because of her pregnancy.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Ms Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "WTG Retail"->"Email of 06/07/2015";
   "Email of 06/07/2015"->"Ms Vandenbon";
   "Email of 06/07/2015"->"It did not want to hire Ms Hakelbracht because of her pregnancy."[dir=none];
   "Ms Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="Informed a suitable candidate was Ms Hakelbracht"];
   "Ms Vandenbon"->"Email 05/07/2015";
   "Email 05/07/2015"->"WTG Retail";
   "Email 05/07/2015"->"A refusal to hire due to pregnancy was prohibited by law."[dir=none];
   "WTG Retail"->"Ms Vandenbon"[label="Refusal to recruit Ms Hakelbracht for pregnancy 12/08/2015"];
   "Ms Vandenbon"->"Ms Hakelbracht"[lable="Informed that she was not accepted because of her pregnancy."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 5 юли 2015 г. г‑жа Vandenbon уведомява WTG Retail, че е намерила подходящ кандидат в лицето на г‑жа Hakelbracht. С имейл от 6 юли 2015 г. отговорникът за човешките ресурси на това предприятие обаче я уведомява, че не желае да наеме на работа г‑жа Hakelbracht поради бременността ѝ.
С имейл от 7 юли 2015 г. г‑жа Vandenbon съобщава на WTG Retail, че подобен отказ за назначаване поради бременност е забранен от закона. На 12 август 2015 г. обаче тя разбира, че WTG Retail потвърждава отказа г‑жа Hakelbracht да бъде назначена поради същата причина.
На същия ден г‑жа Vandenbon уведомява г‑жа Hakelbracht, че кандидатурата ѝ е отхвърлена поради нейната бременност.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "г‑жа Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"6 юли 2015 г. 06/07/2015";
  "6 юли 2015 г. 06/07/2015"->"г‑жа Vandenbon";
  "6 юли 2015 г. 06/07/2015"->"не желае да наеме на работа г‑жа Hakelbracht поради бременността ѝ.."[dir=none];
  "г‑жа Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="е намерила подходящ кандидат в лицето на г‑жа Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
  "г‑жа Vandenbon"->"Email 05/07/2015";
  "Email 05/07/2015"->"WTG Retail";
  "Email 05/07/2015"->"отказ за назначаване поради бременност е забранен от закона.."[dir=none];
  "WTG Retail"->"г‑жа Vandenbon"[label="Refusal to recruit г‑жа Hakelbracht for pregnancy 12/08/2015"];
  "г‑жа Vandenbon"->"г‑жа Hakelbracht"[lable="уведомява г‑жа Hakelbracht, че кандидатурата ѝ е отхвърлена поради нейната бременност.."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 5 de julio de 2015, la Sra. Vandenbon informó a WTG Retail de que había encontrado una candidata adecuada en la persona de la Sra. Hakelbracht. No obstante, la responsable de recursos humanos de esa empresa le hizo saber, mediante correo electrónico de 6 de julio de 2015, su intención de no contratar a la Sra. Hakelbracht debido a su embarazo.
Mediante correo electrónico de 7 de julio de 2015, la Sra. Vandenbon indicó a WTG Retail que la ley prohibía que se rechazara la contratación por razón de embarazo. No obstante, el 12 de agosto de 2015, supo que WTG Retail confirmaba la negativa a contratar a la Sra. Hakelbracht por el mismo motivo.
El mismo día, la Sra. Vandenbon informó a la Sra. Hakelbracht de que su candidatura no había sido seleccionada debido a su embarazo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sra. Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"correo electrónico de 06/07/2015";
  "correo electrónico de 06/07/2015"->"Sra. Vandenbon";
  "correo electrónico de 06/07/2015"->"No contratar a la Sra. Hakelbracht debido a su embarazo.."[dir=none];
  "Sra. Vandenbon"->"WTG Retail"[label="la Sra. Vandenbon informó a WTG Retail de que había encontrado una candidata adecuada en la persona de la Sra. Hakelbracht. Hakelbracht"];
  "Sra. Vandenbon"->"Email 05/07/2015";
  "Email 05/07/2015"->"WTG Retail";
  "Email 05/07/2015"->"la ley prohibía que se rechazara la contratación por razón de embarazo.."[dir=none];
  "WTG Retail"->"Sra. Vandenbon"[label="Refusal to recruit Sra. Hakelbracht for pregnancy 12/08/2015"];
  "Sra. Vandenbon"->"Sra. Hakelbracht"[lable="la Sra. Vandenbon informó a la Sra. Hakelbracht de que su candidatura no había sido seleccionada debido a su embarazo.."];
    
}