mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Jamina Hakelbracht kontaktade därefter WTG Retail angående beslutet att inte anställa henne och meddelade att hon hade för avsikt att framställa klagomål mot företaget hos institutet. Eftersom WTG Retail därefter inte ändrade sin inställning inkom Jamina Hakelbracht med sitt klagomål och informerade företaget härom den 26 september 2015.
Den 5 oktober 2015 hade Tine Vandenbon ett samtal med personalchefen på WTG Retail om beslutet att inte ge Jamina Hakelbracht tjänsten. Under mötet anklagades Tine Vandenbon för att vara anledningen till klagomålet.
Den 12 november 2015 informerade institutet WTG Retail om att man tagit emot Jamina Hakelbrachts klagomål. I e-postmeddelande som skickades till institutet den 11 december 2015 bestred företaget formellt att man nekat Jamina Hakelbracht anställning på grund av hennes graviditet.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "institutet"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Jamina Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"WTG Retail"[label="informerade företaget 26/09/2015"];
  "Jamina Hakelbracht Hakelbracht"->"institutet"[label="framställa klagomål mot företaget"];
  "institutet"->"WTG Retail"[label="I e-postmeddelande som skickades till institutet den 11 december 2015 bestred företaget formellt att man nekat Jamina Hakelbracht anställning på grund av hennes graviditet.."];
  "WTG Retail"->"e-postmeddelande 11/12/2015";
  "e-postmeddelande 11/12/2015"->"institutet";
  "e-postmeddelande 11/12/2015"->"I e-postmeddelande som skickades till institutet den 11 december 2015 bestred företaget formellt att man nekat Jamina Hakelbracht anställning på grund av hennes graviditet.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: English

On 6 April 2016, WTG Retail terminated Ms Vandenbon’s contract of employment. On 13 April 2016, Ms Vandenbon lodged a complaint with the Institute. Having been questioned by Ms Vandenbon on the reasons for her dismissal, WTG Retail communicated them to her in a detailed manner by letter of 10 June 2016. Those reasons included, in particular, defective performance of assigned duties, lack of respect for safety regulations, inadequate maintenance of the shop and lack of order. The trade union to which Ms Vandenbon was affiliated challenged those reasons.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Ms Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Institute"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The trade union"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "WTG Retail"->"Ms Vandenbon"[label="Terminated contract of employment 06/04/2016"];
   "WTG Retail"->"Letter 10/06/2016";
   "Letter 10/06/2016"->"Ms Vandenbon";
   "Letter 10/06/2016"->"Reasons included, in particular, defective performance of assigned duties, lack of respect for safety regulations, inadequate maintenance of the shop and lack of order."[dir=none];
   "Ms Vandenbon"->"Institute"[label="Lodged a complaint 13/04/2016"];
   "The trade union"->"WTG Retail"[label="Challenged dismissal reasons."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 6 април 2016 г. WTG Retail прекратява трудовия договор на г‑жа Vandenbon. На 13 април 2016 г. тя подава жалба до Института. След като получава запитване от г‑жа Vandenbon за мотивите за нейното уволнение, WTG Retail ѝ ги съобщава обстоятелствено с писмо от 10 юни 2016 г. Те включват по-специално неточно изпълнение на възложените задачи, неспазване на правилата за безопасност, недостатъчна поддръжка на магазина и липса на ред. Синдикатът, в който членува г‑жа Vandenbon, оспорва тези мотиви.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "г‑жа Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Института"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Синдикатът"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"г‑жа Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="прекратява трудовия договор 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"писмо от 10 юни 2016 г. 10/06/2016";
  "писмо от 10 юни 2016 г. 10/06/2016"->"г‑жа Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "писмо от 10 юни 2016 г. 10/06/2016"->"Те включват по-специално неточно изпълнение на възложените задачи, неспазване на правилата за безопасност, недостатъчна поддръжка на магазина и липса на ред.."[dir=none];
  "г‑жа Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Института"[label="тя подава жалба 13/04/2016"];
  "Синдикатът"->"WTG Retail"[label="оспорва тези мотиви."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 6 de abril de 2016, WTG Retail rescindió el contrato de trabajo de la Sra. Vandenbon. El 13 de abril de 2016, esta presentó una reclamación ante el Instituto. Al ser preguntada por la Sra. Vandenbon acerca de los motivos de su despido, WTG Retail se los comunicó de manera pormenorizada mediante escrito de 10 de junio de 2016. Entre esos motivos figuraban, en particular, la ejecución incorrecta de las tareas confiadas, el incumplimiento de las consignas de seguridad, el mantenimiento insuficiente de la tienda y la falta de orden. El sindicato al que estaba afiliada la Sra. Vandenbon impugnó esos motivos.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sra. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Instituto"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "El sindicato"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"Sra. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="rescindió el contrato de trabajo 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"escrito de 10 de junio de 2016 10/06/2016";
  "escrito de 10 de junio de 2016 10/06/2016"->"Sra. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "escrito de 10 de junio de 2016 10/06/2016"->"Entre esos motivos figuraban, en particular, la ejecución incorrecta de las tareas confiadas, el incumplimiento de las consignas de seguridad, el mantenimiento insuficiente de la tienda y la falta de orden.."[dir=none];
  "Sra. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Instituto"[label="presentó una reclamación 13/04/2016"];
  "El sindicato"->"WTG Retail"[label="El sindicato al que estaba afiliada la Sra. Vandenbon impugnó esos motivos.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dne 6. dubna 2016 vypověděla společnost WTG Retail pracovní smlouvu uzavřenou s T. Vandenbon. Posledně uvedená podala dne 13. dubna 2016 stížnost u Institutu. Když se T. Vandenbon dotázala na důvody svého propuštění, sdělila jí je společnost WTG Retail podrobně v dopise ze dne 10. června 2016. Tyto důvody zahrnovaly zejména chybné plnění svěřených úkolů, nedodržování bezpečnostních pokynů, nedostatečnou údržbu obchodu a nepořádnost. Odbory, jejichž členkou byla T. Vandenbon, uvedené důvody zpochybnily.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Institutu"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Odbory"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="vypověděla společnost WTG Retail pracovní smlouvu 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"dopise ze dne 10. června 2016. 10/06/2016";
  "dopise ze dne 10. června 2016. 10/06/2016"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "dopise ze dne 10. června 2016. 10/06/2016"->"Tyto důvody zahrnovaly zejména chybné plnění svěřených úkolů, nedodržování bezpečnostních pokynů, nedostatečnou údržbu obchodu a nepořádnost.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Institutu"[label="podala dne 13. dubna 2016 stížnost 13/04/2016"];
  "Odbory"->"WTG Retail"[label="uvedené důvody zpochybnily.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den 6. april 2016 opsagde WTG Retail Tine Vandenbons ansættelseskontrakt. Den 13. april 2016 indgav sidstnævnte en klage til instituttet. Efter at Tine Vandenbon havde anmodet om at få oplyst grundene til afskedigelsen, meddelte WTG Retail hende disse udførligt ved skrivelse af 10. juni 2016. Disse grunde omfattede bl.a. forkert udførelse af betroede opgaver, tilsidesættelse af sikkerhedsforskrifter, utilstrækkelig vedligeholdelse af butikken og mangel på orden. Tine Vandenbons fagforening anfægtede de nævnte grunde.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "instituttet"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tine Vandenbons fagforening"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="opsagde WTG Retail Tine Vandenbons ansættelseskontrakt. 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"skrivelse af 10. juni 2016 10/06/2016";
  "skrivelse af 10. juni 2016 10/06/2016"->"Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "skrivelse af 10. juni 2016 10/06/2016"->"Disse grunde omfattede bl.a. forkert udførelse af betroede opgaver, tilsidesættelse af sikkerhedsforskrifter, utilstrækkelig vedligeholdelse af butikken og mangel på orden.."[dir=none];
  "Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"instituttet"[label="indgav sidstnævnte en klage 13/04/2016"];
  "Tine Vandenbons fagforening"->"WTG Retail"[label="anfægtede de nævnte grunde.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: German

Am 6. April 2016 beendete WTG Retail den Arbeitsvertrag von Frau Vandenbon. Am 13. April 2016 reichte Frau Vandenbon Beschwerde beim Institut ein. Auf Anfrage von Frau Vandenbon nach den Gründen für ihre Kündigung übermittelte WTG Retail ihr diese ausführlich mit einem Schreiben vom 10. Juni 2016. Als Gründe wurden u. a. die mangelhafte Ausführung übertragener Aufgaben, die Nichtbefolgung von Sicherheitsvorschriften, die unzureichende Instandhaltung des Geschäfts und fehlende Ordnung angeführt. Die Gewerkschaft, deren Mitglied Frau Vandenbon war, bestritt diese Gründe.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Frau Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Institut"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Die Gewerkschaft"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"Frau Vandenbon"[label="beendete WTG Retail den Arbeitsvertrag von Frau Vandenbon. 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"einem Schreiben vom 10. Juni 2016. 10/06/2016";
  "einem Schreiben vom 10. Juni 2016. 10/06/2016"->"Frau Vandenbon";
  "einem Schreiben vom 10. Juni 2016. 10/06/2016"->"Als Gründe wurden u. a. die mangelhafte Ausführung übertragener Aufgaben, die Nichtbefolgung von Sicherheitsvorschriften, die unzureichende Instandhaltung des Geschäfts und fehlende Ordnung angeführt.."[dir=none];
  "Frau Vandenbon"->"Institut"[label="reichte Frau Vandenbon Beschwerde beim Institut ein. 13/04/2016"];
  "Die Gewerkschaft"->"WTG Retail"[label="bestritt diese Gründe.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

6. aprillil 2016 ütles WTG Retail T. Vandenboni töölepingu üles. Viimane esitas 13. aprillil 2016 Instituudile kaebuse. WTG Retail, kellelt T. Vandenbon töölepingu ülesütlemise põhjuste kohta päris, põhjendas ülesütlemist üksikasjalikult 10. juuni 2016. aasta kirjas. Põhjenduste hulgas oli eelkõige esile toodud tööülesannete mittenõuetekohane täitmine, turvanõuete järgimata jätmine, kaupluse ebapiisav korrashoid ja korra puudumine. Ametiühing, kuhu T. Vandenbon kuulus, seadis need põhjendused kahtluse alla.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Instituudile"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Ametiühing"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="ütles WTG Retail T. Vandenboni töölepingu üles. 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"10. juuni 2016. aasta kiri 10/06/2016";
  "10. juuni 2016. aasta kiri 10/06/2016"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "10. juuni 2016. aasta kiri 10/06/2016"->"Põhjenduste hulgas oli eelkõige esile toodud tööülesannete mittenõuetekohane täitmine, turvanõuete järgimata jätmine, kaupluse ebapiisav korrashoid ja korra puudumine.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Instituudile"[label="esitas kaebuse 13/04/2016"];
  "Ametiühing"->"WTG Retail"[label="Ametiühing, kuhu T. Vandenbon kuulus, seadis need põhjendused kahtluse alla.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 6 Απριλίου 2016, η WTG Retail κατήγγειλε τη σύμβαση εργασίας της Τ. Vandenbon. Στις 13 Απριλίου 2016, η τελευταία υπέβαλε καταγγελία στο Ινστιτούτο. Ερωτηθείσα από την Τ. Vandenbon σχετικά με τους λόγους της απόλυσής της, η WTG Retail της γνωστοποίησε λεπτομερώς τους λόγους αυτούς με επιστολή της 10ης Ιουνίου 2016. Σε αυτούς περιλαμβάνονταν, μεταξύ άλλων, η πλημμελής εκτέλεση των ανατιθέμενων καθηκόντων, η μη συμμόρφωση με τις οδηγίες ασφαλείας, η ανεπαρκής συντήρηση του καταστήματος και η έλλειψη τάξης. Το συνδικάτο του οποίου ήταν μέλος η Τ. Vandenbon αμφισβήτησε τους ως άνω λόγους.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Τ. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Ινστιτούτο"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Το συνδικάτο"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"Τ. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="κατήγγειλε τη σύμβαση εργασίας 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"επιστολή 10/06/2016";
  "επιστολή 10/06/2016"->"Τ. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "επιστολή 10/06/2016"->"Σε αυτούς περιλαμβάνονταν, μεταξύ άλλων, η πλημμελής εκτέλεση των ανατιθέμενων καθηκόντων, η μη συμμόρφωση με τις οδηγίες ασφαλείας, η ανεπαρκής συντήρηση του καταστήματος και η έλλειψη τάξης.."[dir=none];
  "Τ. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Ινστιτούτο"[label="υπέβαλε καταγγελία 13/04/2016"];
  "Το συνδικάτο"->"WTG Retail"[label="αμφισβήτησε τους ως άνω λόγους."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: French

Le 6 avril 2016, WTG Retail a résilié le contrat de travail de Mme Vandenbon. Le 13 avril 2016, cette dernière a déposé plainte auprès de l’Institut. Ayant été interrogée par Mme Vandenbon sur les motifs de son licenciement, WTG Retail les lui a communiqués de manière circonstanciée par courrier du 10 juin 2016. Ces motifs comprenaient, notamment, l’exécution incorrecte des tâches confiées, le non-respect des consignes de sécurité, l’entretien insuffisant du magasin et un manque d’ordre. Le syndicat auquel était affiliée Mme Vandenbon a contesté lesdits motifs.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Mme Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l’Institut"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Le syndicat"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"Mme Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="a résilié le contrat de travail 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"courrier du 10 juin 2016 10/06/2016";
  "courrier du 10 juin 2016 10/06/2016"->"Mme Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "courrier du 10 juin 2016 10/06/2016"->"Ces motifs comprenaient, notamment, l’exécution incorrecte des tâches confiées, le non-respect des consignes de sécurité, l’entretien insuffisant du magasin et un manque d’ordre.."[dir=none];
  "Mme Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"l’Institut"[label="a déposé plainte 13/04/2016"];
  "Le syndicat"->"WTG Retail"[label="Le syndicat auquel était affiliée Mme Vandenbon a contesté lesdits motifs.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Dana 6. travnja 2016. društvo WTG Retail raskinulo je ugovor o radu T. Vandenbon. Dana 13. travnja 2016. ona je podnijela pritužbu Institutu. Na upit T. Vandenbon o razlozima njezina otpuštanja, društvo WTG Retail odgovorilo joj je obrazloženjem priopćenim dopisom od 10. lipnja 2016. Ti su razlozi, među ostalim, obuhvaćali nepravilno obavljanje povjerenih zadataka, nepoštovanje sigurnosnih uputa, nedovoljno održavanje dućana i nedostatak reda. Sindikat čiji je član bila T. Vandenbon osporavalo je navedene razloge.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Institutu"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sindikat"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="raskinulo je ugovor o radu 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"dopisom od 10. lipnja 2016. 10/06/2016";
  "dopisom od 10. lipnja 2016. 10/06/2016"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "dopisom od 10. lipnja 2016. 10/06/2016"->"Ti su razlozi, među ostalim, obuhvaćali nepravilno obavljanje povjerenih zadataka, nepoštovanje sigurnosnih uputa, nedovoljno održavanje dućana i nedostatak reda.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Institutu"[label="podnijela pritužbu 13/04/2016"];
  "Sindikat"->"WTG Retail"[label="Sindikat čiji je član bila T. Vandenbon osporavalo je navedene razloge.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 6 aprile 2016, la WTG Retail ha risolto il contratto di lavoro della sig.ra Vandenbon. Il 13 aprile 2016 quest’ultima ha presentato reclamo dinanzi all’Istituto. Interrogata dalla sig.ra Vandenbon sui motivi del suo licenziamento, la WTG Retail glieli ha comunicati in modo circostanziato con lettera del 10 giugno 2016. Tali motivi comprendevano, in particolare, lo svolgimento carente dei compiti affidati, l’inosservanza delle norme di sicurezza, l’insufficiente manutenzione del negozio e una mancanza di ordine. Il sindacato al quale la sig.ra Vandenbon era iscritta ha contestato detti motivi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "sig.ra Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Istituto"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Il sindacato"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"sig.ra Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="risolto il contratto di lavoro 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"lettera del 10 giugno 2016 10/06/2016";
  "lettera del 10 giugno 2016 10/06/2016"->"sig.ra Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "lettera del 10 giugno 2016 10/06/2016"->"Tali motivi comprendevano, in particolare, lo svolgimento carente dei compiti affidati, l’inosservanza delle norme di sicurezza, l’insufficiente manutenzione del negozio e una mancanza di ordine.."[dir=none];
  "sig.ra Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Istituto"[label="ha presentato reclamo 13/04/2016"];
  "Il sindacato"->"WTG Retail"[label="Il sindacato al quale la sig.ra Vandenbon era iscritta ha contestato detti motivi.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

WTG Retail2016. gada 6. aprīlī izbeidza darba līgumu ar T. Vandenbon. 2016. gada 13. aprīlī pēdējā minētā iesniedza sūdzību institūtā. Tā kā T. Vandenbon vaicāja par viņas atlaišanas iemesliem, WTG Retail tos viņai detalizēti izklāstīja 2016. gada 10. jūnija vēstulē. Šo iemelsu vidū tostarp bija minēta uzticēto pienākumu nepienācīga izpilde, drošības instrukciju neievērošana, veikala nepietiekama uzturēšana un kārtības trūkums. Arodbiedrība, kurai bija piesaistīta T. Vandenbon, apstrīdēja minētos iemeslus.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "institūtā"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Arodbiedrība"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="izbeidza darba līgumu 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"2016. gada 10. jūnija vēstulē. 10/06/2016";
  "2016. gada 10. jūnija vēstulē. 10/06/2016"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "2016. gada 10. jūnija vēstulē. 10/06/2016"->"Iemeslu vidū tostarp bija minēta uzticēto pienākumu nepienācīga izpilde, drošības instrukciju neievērošana, veikala nepietiekama uzturēšana un kārtības trūkums.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"institūtā"[label="iesniedza sūdzību 13/04/2016"];
  "Arodbiedrība"->"WTG Retail"[label="apstrīdēja minētos iemeslus.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2016 m. balandžio 6 d.WTG Retail nutraukė T. Vandenbon darbo sutartį. 2016 m. balandžio 13 d. ši pateikė skundą Institutui. Gavusi T. Vandenbon klausimą dėl jos atleidimo iš darbo priežasčių, WTG Retail jas išsamiai išdėstė 2016 m. birželio 10 d. laiške. Tarp tų priežasčių, be kita ko, buvo netinkamas patikėtų užduočių vykdymas, saugos reikalavimų nesilaikymas, prasta parduotuvės priežiūra ir tvarkos trūkumas. Profesinė sąjunga, kuriai priklausė T. Vandenbon, ginčijo šias priežastis.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Institutui"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Profesinė sąjunga"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="nutraukė T. Vandenbon darbo sutartį. 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"2016 m. birželio 10 d. laiške. 10/06/2016";
  "2016 m. birželio 10 d. laiške. 10/06/2016"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "2016 m. birželio 10 d. laiške. 10/06/2016"->"Tarp tų priežasčių, be kita ko, buvo netinkamas patikėtų užduočių vykdymas, saugos reikalavimų nesilaikymas, prasta parduotuvės priežiūra ir tvarkos trūkumas.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Institutui"[label="pateikė skundą 13/04/2016"];
  "Profesinė sąjunga"->"WTG Retail"[label="ginčijo šias priežastis."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2016. április 6‑án a WTG Retail megszüntette T. Vandenbon munkaszerződését. 2016. április 13‑án ez utóbbi az Intézetnél panaszt nyújtott be. Miután T. Vandenbon elbocsátásának indokai iránt érdeklődött, a WTG Retail 2016. június 10‑i levelében részletesen közölte azokat vele. Ezek az indokok magukban foglalták többek között a rá bízott feladatok nem megfelelő végrehajtását, a biztonsági előírások betartásának a hiányát, az üzlet fenntartásával kapcsolatos elégtelenségeket és a rend hiányát. Az a szakszervezet, amelyhez T. Vandenbon tartozott, vitatta az említett indokokat.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Intézetnél"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Az a szakszervezet"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="megszüntette T. Vandenbon munkaszerződését 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"2016. június 10‑i levél 10/06/2016";
  "2016. június 10‑i levél 10/06/2016"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "2016. június 10‑i levél 10/06/2016"->"Ezek az indokok magukban foglalták többek között a rá bízott feladatok nem megfelelő végrehajtását, a biztonsági előírások betartásának a hiányát, az üzlet fenntartásával kapcsolatos elégtelenségeket és a rend hiányát.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Intézetnél"[label="panaszt nyújtott be 13/04/2016"];
  "Az a szakszervezet"->"WTG Retail"[label="vitatatta az említett indokokat."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fis-6 ta’ April 2016, WTG Retail temmet il-kuntratt tax-xogħol ta’ T. Vandenbon. Fit-13 ta’ April 2016, din tal-aħħar ressqet ilment quddiem l-Istitut. Mitluba minn T. Vandenbon tindika r-raġunijiet tat-tkeċċija tagħha, WTG Retail bagħtitilha informazzjoni ddettaljata dwar dawn ir-raġunijiet b’ittra datata l-10 ta’ Ġunju 2016. Dawn ir-raġunijiet kienu jinkludu, b’mod partikolari, l-implimentazzjoni mhux korretta tal-kompiti fdati lilha, in-nuqqas ta’ konformità mal-istruzzjonijiet ta’ sigurtà, il-ġestjoni insuffiċjenti tal-ħanut u n-nuqqas ta’ ordni. Is-sindakat li miegħu kienet affiljata T. Vandenbon ikkontesta l-imsemmija raġunijiet.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l-Istitut"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Is-sindakat"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="temmet il-kuntratt tax-xogħol ta’ T. Vandenbon. 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"ittra datata l-10 ta’ Ġunju 2016 10/06/2016";
  "ittra datata l-10 ta’ Ġunju 2016 10/06/2016"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "ittra datata l-10 ta’ Ġunju 2016 10/06/2016"->"Dawn ir-raġunijiet kienu jinkludu, b’mod partikolari, l-implimentazzjoni mhux korretta tal-kompiti fdati lilha, in-nuqqas ta’ konformità mal-istruzzjonijiet ta’ sigurtà, il-ġestjoni insuffiċjenti tal-ħanut u n-nuqqas ta’ ordni.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"l-Istitut"[label="ressqet ilment 13/04/2016"];
  "Is-sindakat"->"WTG Retail"[label="ikkontesta l-imsemmija raġunijiet.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 6 april 2016 ontbond WTG Retail de arbeidsovereenkomst met Vandenbon. Op 13 april 2016 heeft Vandenbon een klacht ingediend bij het Instituut. WTG Retail heeft de redenen voor het ontslag van Vandenbon, waarom deze had gevraagd, bij brief van 10 juni 2016 omstandig uiteengezet. Die redenen bestonden met name in de onjuiste uitvoering van de toevertrouwde taken, niet-inachtneming van de veiligheidsvoorschriften, ontoereikend onderhoud van de winkel en gebrek aan orde. De vakorganisatie waarbij Vandenbon was aangesloten betwistte die redenen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Mevrouw Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Instituut"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "De vakorganisatie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"Mevrouw Vandenbon"[label="ontbond WTG Retail de arbeidsovereenkomst met Vandenbon 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"brief van 10 juni 2016 10/06/2016";
  "brief van 10 juni 2016 10/06/2016"->"Mevrouw Vandenbon";
  "brief van 10 juni 2016 10/06/2016"->"Die redenen bestonden met name in de onjuiste uitvoering van de toevertrouwde taken, niet-inachtneming van de veiligheidsvoorschriften, ontoereikend onderhoud van de winkel en gebrek aan orde.."[dir=none];
  "Mevrouw Vandenbon"->"Instituut"[label="een klacht ingediend 13/04/2016"];
  "De vakorganisatie"->"WTG Retail"[label="De vakorganisatie waarbij Vandenbon was aangesloten betwistte die redenen.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 6 kwietnia 2016 r. WTG Retail rozwiązało umowę o pracę z T. Vandenbon. W dniu 13 kwietnia 2016 r. T. Vandenbon złożyła skargę do instytutu. W odpowiedzi na pytanie T. Vandenbon dotyczące powodów jej zwolnienia WTG Retail szczegółowo przedstawiło je pismem z dnia 10 czerwca 2016 r. Wśród wspomnianych powodów wymieniono między innymi niezadowalające wykonywanie powierzonych jej obowiązków, brak poszanowania zasad bezpieczeństwa, utrzymanie sklepu w stanie poniżej normy oraz brak porządku. Powody te zostały zakwestionowane przez związek zawodowy, do którego należała T. Vandenbon.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "instytutu"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "związek zawodowy"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="rozwiązało umowę o pracę 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"pismem z dnia 10 czerwca 2016 r. 10/06/2016";
  "pismem z dnia 10 czerwca 2016 r. 10/06/2016"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "pismem z dnia 10 czerwca 2016 r. 10/06/2016"->"Wśród wspomnianych powodów wymieniono między innymi niezadowalające wykonywanie powierzonych jej obowiązków, brak poszanowania zasad bezpieczeństwa, utrzymanie sklepu w stanie poniżej normy oraz brak porządku.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"instytutu"[label="złożyła skargę 13/04/2016"];
  "związek zawodowy"->"WTG Retail"[label="Powody te zostały zakwestionowane przez związek zawodowy, do którego należała T. Vandenbon.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 6 de abril de 2016, a WTG Retail resolveu o contrato de trabalho de T. Vandenbon. Em 13 de abril de 2016, esta apresentou queixa ao Instituto. A WTG Retail, após ter sido interrogada por T. Vandenbon sobre os motivos do seu despedimento, comunicou‑lhos circunstanciadamente por carta de 10 de junho de 2016. Esses motivos compreendiam, nomeadamente, a execução incorreta das tarefas confiadas, o desrespeito das instruções de segurança, a manutenção insuficiente da loja e falta de ordem. O sindicato em que T. Vandenbon estava filiada contestou os referidos fundamentos.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Instituto"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "O sindicato"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="resolveu o contrato de trabalho 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"carta de 10 de junho de 2016 10/06/2016";
  "carta de 10 de junho de 2016 10/06/2016"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "carta de 10 de junho de 2016 10/06/2016"->"Esses motivos compreendiam, nomeadamente, a execução incorreta das tarefas confiadas, o desrespeito das instruções de segurança, a manutenção insuficiente da loja e falta de ordem.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Instituto"[label="apresentou queixa 13/04/2016"];
  "O sindicato"->"WTG Retail"[label="O sindicato em que T. Vandenbon estava filiada contestou os referidos fundamentos.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 6 aprilie 2016, WTG Retail a reziliat contractul de muncă al doamnei Vandenbon. La 13 aprilie 2016, aceasta din urmă a depus plângere la institut. Fiind întrebată de doamna Vandenbon cu privire la motivele concedierii sale, WTG Retail i le‑a comunicat acesteia în mod detaliat prin scrisoarea din 10 iunie 2016. Aceste motive includeau, printre altele, executarea incorectă a sarcinilor încredințate, nerespectarea instrucțiunilor de securitate, întreținerea insuficientă a magazinului și o lipsă de ordine. Sindicatul la care era afiliată doamna Vandenbon a contestat motivele menționate.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "doamnei Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "institut"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sindicatul"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"doamnei Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="a reziliat contractul de muncă 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"scrisoarea din 10 iunie 2016. 10/06/2016";
  "scrisoarea din 10 iunie 2016. 10/06/2016"->"doamnei Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "scrisoarea din 10 iunie 2016. 10/06/2016"->"Aceste motive includeau, printre altele, executarea incorectă a sarcinilor încredințate, nerespectarea instrucțiunilor de securitate, întreținerea insuficientă a magazinului și o lipsă de ordine.."[dir=none];
  "doamnei Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"institut"[label="a depus plângere 13/04/2016"];
  "Sindicatul"->"WTG Retail"[label="Sindicatul la care era afiliată doamna Vandenbon a contestat motivele menționate.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 6. apríla 2016 WTG Retail vypovedala pracovnú zmluvu pani Vandenbonovej. Dňa 13. apríla 2016 pani Vandenbonová podala sťažnosť na Inštitút. Keď sa pani Vandenbonová pýtala na dôvody jej prepustenia, WTG Retail jej ich podrobne oznámila listom z 10. júna 2016. Tieto dôvody zahŕňali najmä nesprávne vykonávanie zverených úloh, nedodržiavanie bezpečnostných pokynov, nedostatočnú údržbu obchodu a nedbalosť. Odborové združenie, ktorého bola pani Vandenbonová členom, spochybnilo uvedené dôvody.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "pani Vandenbonová Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Inštitút"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Odborové združenie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"pani Vandenbonová Vandenbon"[label="vypovedala pracovnú zmluvu 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"listom z 10. júna 2016. 10/06/2016";
  "listom z 10. júna 2016. 10/06/2016"->"pani Vandenbonová Vandenbon";
  "listom z 10. júna 2016. 10/06/2016"->"Tieto dôvody zahŕňali najmä nesprávne vykonávanie zverených úloh, nedodržiavanie bezpečnostných pokynov, nedostatočnú údržbu obchodu a nedbalosť.."[dir=none];
  "pani Vandenbonová Vandenbon"->"Inštitút"[label="Dňa 13. apríla 2016 pani Vandenbonová podala sťažnosť na Inštitút. 13/04/2016"];
  "Odborové združenie"->"WTG Retail"[label="spochybnilo uvedené dôvody.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Družba WTG Retail je 6. aprila 2016 odpovedala pogodbo o zaposlitvi T. Vandenbon. Slednja je 13. aprila 2016 pri Inštitutu vložila pritožbo. Družba WTG Retail, ki jo je T. Vandenbon vprašala o razlogih za odpoved njene pogodbe o zaposlitvi, ji je te izčrpno sporočila z dopisom dne 10. junija 2016. Ti razlogi so vključevali zlasti nepravilno izvajanje zaupanih nalog, neupoštevanje varnostnih navodil, nezadostno vzdrževanje skladišča in pomanjkanje reda. Sindikat, v katerega je bila včlanjena T. Vandenbon, je navedene razloge izpodbijal.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Inštitut"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sindikat"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="odpovedala pogodbo o zaposlitvi 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"dopisom dne 10. junija 2016 10/06/2016";
  "dopisom dne 10. junija 2016 10/06/2016"->"T. Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "dopisom dne 10. junija 2016 10/06/2016"->"Ti razlogi so vključevali zlasti nepravilno izvajanje zaupanih nalog, neupoštevanje varnostnih navodil, nezadostno vzdrževanje skladišča in pomanjkanje reda.."[dir=none];
  "T. Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"Inštitut"[label="vložila pritožbo 13/04/2016"];
  "Sindikat"->"WTG Retail"[label="Navedene razloge izpodbijal.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

WTG irtisanoi 6.4.2016 Vandenbonin työsopimuksen. Viimeksi mainittu teki 13.4.2016 valituksen virastoon. Vandenbonin tiedusteltua syitä irtisanomiselleen WTG Retail antoi ne hänelle tiedoksi yksityiskohtaisesti 10.6.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellä. Näihin syihin sisältyi muun muassa hänelle uskottujen tehtävien virheellinen suorittaminen, turvallisuusmääräysten noudattamatta jättäminen, myymälän riittämätön kunnossapito ja järjestyksen puute. Ammattijärjestö, johon Vandenbon kuului, kiisti nämä syyt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "virastoon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Ammattijärjestö"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="WTG irtisanoi 6.4.2016 Vandenbonin työsopimuksen. 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"10.6.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellä. 10/06/2016";
  "10.6.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellä. 10/06/2016"->"Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "10.6.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellä. 10/06/2016"->"Näihin syihin sisältyi muun muassa hänelle uskottujen tehtävien virheellinen suorittaminen, turvallisuusmääräysten noudattamatta jättäminen, myymälän riittämätön kunnossapito ja järjestyksen puute.."[dir=none];
  "Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"virastoon"[label="teki valituksen 13/04/2016"];
  "Ammattijärjestö"->"WTG Retail"[label="Ammattijärjestö, johon Vandenbon kuului, kiisti nämä syyt.."];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.
Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.
Case C-404/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Den 6 april 2016 sade WTG upp anställningsavtalet med Tine Vandenbon. Den 13 april 2016 framställde även Tine Vandenbon klagomål till institutet. Sedan Tine Vandenbon frågat om skälen till sin uppsägning informerade WTG Retail henne om dem på ett omständligt sätt i ett brev av den 10 juni 2016. Som skäl angavs bland annat att hon brustit i utförandet av sina arbetsuppgifter, visat bristande respekt för säkerhetsföreskrifterna, städat butiken bristfälligt och visat brist på ordning. Den fackförening som Tine Vandenbon var ansluten till har bestridit skälen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "WTG Retail"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "institutet"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Den fackförening"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "WTG Retail"->"Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"[label="sade WTG upp anställningsavtalet med Tine Vandenbon. 06/04/2016"];
  "WTG Retail"->"brev av den 10 juni 2016 10/06/2016";
  "brev av den 10 juni 2016 10/06/2016"->"Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon";
  "brev av den 10 juni 2016 10/06/2016"->"Som skäl angavs bland annat att hon brustit i utförandet av sina arbetsuppgifter, visat bristande respekt för säkerhetsföreskrifterna, städat butiken bristfälligt och visat brist på ordning.."[dir=none];
  "Tine Vandenbon Vandenbon"->"institutet"[label="framställde även Tine Vandenbon klagomål till institutet. 13/04/2016"];
  "Den fackförening"->"WTG Retail"[label="bestridit skälen."];
    
    
}