mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

Con decisione del 2 novembre 2017, la High Court (Alta Corte, Irlanda), dopo aver esaminato le asserzioni di RO relative al trattamento che avrebbe potuto subire in Irlanda del Nord, ha dichiarato che, sulla base di informazioni specifiche e aggiornate riguardanti le condizioni di detenzione nella prigione di Maghaberry, si poteva temere che RO, in ragione dei suoi problemi di salute, rischiasse concretamente di subire trattamenti inumani e degradanti. Essa ha ritenuto necessario, alla luce della sentenza del 5 aprile 2016, Aranyosi e Căldăraru (C‑404/15 e C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), chiedere chiarimenti alle autorità del Regno Unito sulle condizioni di detenzione di RO in caso di consegna.
Il 16 aprile 2018 l’autorità giudiziaria che aveva emesso i mandati d’arresto europei in questione, il Laganside Court in Belfast (Tribunale di Laganside a Belfast, Regno Unito), ha fornito informazioni su come l’amministrazione penitenziaria dell’Irlanda del Nord avrebbe affrontato il rischio che RO fosse sottoposto a trattamenti inumani o degradanti in Irlanda del Nord.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irlanda)"->"ha ritenuto necessario, alla luce della sentenza del 5 aprile 2016, Aranyosi e Căldăraru (C‑404/15 e C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), chiedere chiarimenti alle autorità del Regno Unito"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irlanda)"->"decisione del 2 novembre 2017 02/11/2017";
  "decisione del 2 novembre 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "decisione del 2 novembre 2017 02/11/2017"->"si poteva temere che RO, in ragione dei suoi problemi di salute, rischiasse concretamente di subire trattamenti inumani e degradanti. Regno Unito."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Irlanda)"[label="ha fornito informazioni"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Ar 2017. gada 2. novembra lēmumu High Court (Augstā tiesa, Īrija), izvērtējusi RO apgalvojumus saistībā ar izturēšanos, kas pret viņu varētu tikt vērsta Ziemeļīrijā, atzina, ka atbilstoši precīzai un aktuālai informācijai par ieslodzījuma apstākļiem Magaberijas cietumā var uzskatīt, ka pastāv faktisks risks, ka RO sava vārguma dēļ varētu piedzīvot necilvēcīgu vai pazemojošu izturēšanos. Tā uzskatīja par nepieciešamu, ņemot vērā 2016. gada 5. aprīļa spriedumu Aranyosi un Căldăraru (C‑404/15 un C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), lūgt Apvienotās Karalistes skaidrojumus par RO apcietinājuma apstākļiem viņa nodošanas gadījumā.
2018. gada 16. aprīlī Eiropas apcietināšanas orderu izsniegšanas tiesu iestāde Laganside Court in Belfast (Leigansaidas tiesa Belfāstā, Apvienotā Karaliste) sniedza informāciju par to, kā Ziemeļīrijas Ieslodzījuma vietu pārvalde novērsīs risku, ka pret RO varētu tikt īstenota necilvēcīga vai pazemojoša izturēšanās Ziemeļīrijā.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Īrija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Īrija)"->"Tā uzskatīja par nepieciešamu, lūgt Apvienotās Karalistes skaidrojumus par RO apcietinājuma apstākļiem viņa nodošanas gadījumā."[dir=none];
  "High Court (Īrija)"->"2017. gada 2. novembra lēmumu 02/11/2017";
  "2017. gada 2. novembra lēmumu 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "2017. gada 2. novembra lēmumu 02/11/2017"->"pastāv faktisks risks, ka RO sava vārguma dēļ varētu piedzīvot necilvēcīgu vai pazemojošu izturēšanos. Apvienotā Karaliste."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Īrija)"[label="sniedza informāciju"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2017 m. lapkričio 2 d. sprendime išnagrinėjęs RO teiginius dėl elgesio, kurį jis galėtų patirti Šiaurės Airijoje, High Court (Aukštasis teismas, Airija) nusprendė, kad, remiantis tiksliais ir atnaujintais duomenimis dėl laisvės atėmimo sąlygų Maghaberry kalėjime, yra pagrindas manyti, jog kyla realus pavojus, kad RO dėl savo pažeidžiamumo patirs nežmonišką ar žeminantį elgesį. Atsižvelgdamas į 2016 m. balandžio 5 d. Sprendimą Aranyosi ir Căldăraru (C‑404/15 ir C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), jis manė, jog būtina paprašyti Jungtinės Karalystės institucijų pateikti papildomos informacijos dėl RO laisvės atėmimo sąlygų perdavimo atveju.
2018 m. balandžio 16 d. nagrinėjamus Europos arešto orderius išdavusi teisminė institucija – Laganside Court in Belfast (Belfasto Laganside teismas, Jungtinė Karalystė) pateikė informacijos apie tai, kaip Šiaurės Airijos kalėjimų administracija užtikrins, kad RO nekiltų pavojus patirti nežmonišką ar žeminantį elgesį Šiaurės Airijoje.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Airija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Airija)"->"būtina paprašyti Jungtinės Karalystės institucijų pateikti papildomos informacijos"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Airija)"->"2017 m. lapkričio 2 d. sprendimas
2016 m. balandžio 5 d. Sprendimą Aranyosi ir Căldăraru (C‑404/15 ir C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198) 02/11/2017";
  "2017 m. lapkričio 2 d. sprendimas
2016 m. balandžio 5 d. Sprendimą Aranyosi ir Căldăraru (C‑404/15 ir C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198) 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "2017 m. lapkričio 2 d. sprendimas
2016 m. balandžio 5 d. Sprendimą Aranyosi ir Căldăraru (C‑404/15 ir C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198) 02/11/2017"->"Yra pagrindas manyti, jog kyla realus pavojus, kad RO dėl savo pažeidžiamumo patirs nežmonišką ar žeminantį elgesį. Jungtinės Karalystės."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Airija)"[label="pateikė informacijos apie tai, kaip Šiaurės Airijos kalėjimų administracija užtikrins, kad RO nekiltų pavojus patirti nežmonišką ar žeminantį elgesį Šiaurės Airijoje."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

A High Court (felsőbíróság, Írország), miután megvizsgálta RO‑nak az Észak‑Írországban esetlegesen elszenvedett bánásmódra vonatkozó állításait, egy 2017. november 2‑i határozatban megállapította, hogy a Maghaberry börtönben való fogva tartás körülményeire vonatkozó pontos és aktuális információk alapján feltételezhető, hogy RO a sebezhetősége miatt ténylegesen embertelen vagy megalázó bánásmódnak lesz kitéve. E bíróság a 2016. április 5‑iAranyosi és Căldăraru ítéletre (C‑404/15 és C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198) tekintettel szükségesnek tartotta, hogy további információkat kérjen azon körülmények tekintetében, amelyek között RO‑t átadása esetében fogva fogják tartani.
2018. április 16‑án a szóban forgó európai elfogatóparancsokat kibocsátó igazságügyi hatóság, a belfasti Laganside Court (belfasti laganside‑i bíróság, Egyesült Királyság) tájékoztatást adott arra vonatkozóan, hogy az észak‑írországi büntetés‑végrehajtási szolgálat miként fogja kezelni annak veszélyét, hogy RO Észak‑Írországban embertelen vagy megalázó bánásmódnak lesz kitéve.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Írország)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Írország)"->"szükségesnek tartotta, hogy további információkat kérjen azon körülmények tekintetében"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Írország)"->"2017. november 2‑i határozatban 02/11/2017";
  "2017. november 2‑i határozatban 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "2017. november 2‑i határozatban 02/11/2017"->"RO a sebezhetősége miatt ténylegesen embertelen vagy megalázó bánásmódnak lesz kitéve. Egyesült Királyság."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Írország)"[label="tájékoztatást adott"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Permezz ta’ deċiżjoni tat-2 ta’ Novembru 2017, il-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja, l-Irlanda), wara li eżaminat l-allegazzjonijiet ta’ RO dwar it-trattament li jista’ jkun suġġett għalih fl-Irlanda ta’ Fuq, qieset li, skont informazzjoni preċiża u reċenti dwar il-kundizzjonijiet ta’ detenzjoni fil-ħabs ta’ Maghaberry, kien hemm riskju li minħabba l-vulnerabbiltà tiegħu RO jkun suġġett għal trattament inuman jew degradanti. Hija qieset neċessarju li, fid-dawl tas-sentenza tal-5 ta’ April 2016, Aranyosi u Căldăraru (C-404/15 u C-659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), tintalab kjarifika mill-awtoritajiet tar-Renju Unit dwar il-kundizzjonijiet ta’ detenzjoni ta’ RO fil-każ ta’ konsenja.
Fis-16 ta’ April 2018, l-awtorità ġudizzjarja li ħarġet il-mandati ta’ arrest Ewropej inkwistjoni, il-Laganside Court in Belfast (il-Qorti Laganside f’Belfast, ir-Renju Unit), ikkommunikat informazzjoni dwar kif l-amministrazzjoni penitenzjarja tal-Irlanda ta’ Fuq ser tindirizza r-riskju li RO jkun suġġett għal trattament inuman jew degradanti fl-Irlanda ta’ Fuq.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irlanda)"->"neċessarju li, fid-dawl tas-sentenza tal-5 ta’ April 2016, Aranyosi u Căldăraru (C-404/15 u C-659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), tintalab kjarifika mill-awtoritajiet tar-Renju Unit"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irlanda)"->"deċiżjoni 02/11/2017";
  "deċiżjoni 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "deċiżjoni 02/11/2017"->"kien hemm riskju li minħabba l-vulnerabbiltà tiegħu RO jkun suġġett għal trattament inuman jew degradanti. ir-Renju Unit."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Irlanda)"[label="ikkommunikat informazzjoni"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Nadat de High Court (rechter in eerste aanleg, Ierland) de beweringen van RO over de behandeling die hij mogelijkerwijs zou ondergaan in Noord-Ierland had onderzocht, heeft deze rechterlijke instantie bij beslissing van 2 november 2017 geoordeeld dat op grond van precieze en actuele informatie over de detentieomstandigheden in de gevangenis van Maghaberry kon worden aangenomen dat RO vanwege zijn kwetsbaarheid daadwerkelijk gevaar liep onmenselijke of vernederende behandelingen te ondergaan. Gelet op het arrest van 5 april 2016, Aranyosi en Căldăraru (C‑404/15 en C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), heeft de High Court het nodig geacht de autoriteiten van het Verenigd Koninkrijk te verzoeken om te verduidelijken in welke omstandigheden RO zou worden gedetineerd als hij zou worden overgeleverd.
Op 16 april 2018 heeft de rechterlijke autoriteit die de Europese aanhoudingsbevelen in kwestie heeft uitgevaardigd – de Laganside Court in Belfast (rechtbank van Laganside, Belfast, Verenigd Koninkrijk) – inlichtingen verstrekt over de manier waarop het Noord-Ierse gevangeniswezen het gevaar zou aanpakken dat RO in Noord-Ierland onmenselijke of vernederende behandelingen zou ondergaan.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Ierland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Ierland)"->"het nodig geacht de autoriteiten van het Verenigd Koninkrijk te verzoeken om te verduidelijken"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Ierland)"->"beslissing van 2 november 2017 02/11/2017";
  "beslissing van 2 november 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "beslissing van 2 november 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO vanwege zijn kwetsbaarheid daadwerkelijk gevaar liep onmenselijke of vernederende behandelingen te ondergaan. Verenigd Koninkrijk."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Ierland)"[label="inlichtingen verstrekt"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

W postanowieniu z dnia 2 listopada 2017 r. High Court (wysoki trybunał, Irlandia), po zbadaniu zarzutów RO dotyczących traktowania, którego mógłby on doświadczyć w Irlandii Północnej, stwierdził, że w oparciu o precyzyjne i aktualne informacje o warunkach osadzenia w zakładzie karnym w Maghaberry uzasadnione jest przypuszczenie, że RO, ze względu na jego podatność na zagrożenia, rzeczywiście mógłby doznać nieludzkiego lub poniżającego traktowania. W świetle wyroku z dnia 5 kwietnia 2016 r., Aranyosi i Căldăraru (C‑404/15 i C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), sąd ten uznał za konieczne wystąpienie o wyjaśnienia do władz Zjednoczonego Królestwa w przedmiocie warunków osadzenia RO w razie jego przekazania.
W dniu 16 kwietnia 2018 r. wydający nakaz organ sądowy, czyli Laganside Court in Belfast (sąd Laganside w Belfaście, Zjednoczone Królestwo), przekazał informacje na temat sposobu reagowania służb więziennych Irlandii Północnej na ryzyko narażenia RO na nieludzkie lub poniżające traktowanie w Irlandii Północnej.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irlandia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irlandia)"->"za konieczne wystąpienie o wyjaśnienia do władz Zjednoczonego Królestwa"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irlandia)"->"postanowieniu 02/11/2017";
  "postanowieniu 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "postanowieniu 02/11/2017"->"RO, ze względu na jego podatność na zagrożenia, rzeczywiście mógłby doznać nieludzkiego lub poniżającego traktowania. Zjednoczone Królestwo."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Irlandia)"[label="przekazał informacje"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Por decisão de 2 de novembro de 2017, a High Court (Tribunal Superior, Irlanda), após ter examinado as alegações de RO relativas ao tratamento que poderia sofrer na Irlanda do Norte, considerou que, na sequência de informações precisas e recentes sobre as condições de detenção na prisão de Maghaberry, se podia pensar que, em razão da sua fragilidade, RO correria realmente o risco de sofrer tratamentos desumanos ou degradantes. À luz do Acórdão de 5 de abril de 2016, Aranyosi e Căldăraru (C‑404/15 e C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), considerou necessário pedir esclarecimentos às autoridades do Reino Unido sobre as condições de detenção de RO em caso de entrega.
Em 16 de abril de 2018, a autoridade judiciária de emissão dos mandados de detenção europeus em causa, o Laganside Court in Belfast (Tribunal de Laganside, Belfast, Irlanda do Norte), prestou informações sobre a forma como a administração penitenciária da Irlanda do Norte geriria o risco de RO sofrer tratamentos desumanos ou degradantes na Irlanda do Norte.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irlanda)"->"necessário pedir esclarecimentos às autoridades do Reino Unido"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irlanda)"->"decisão de 2 de novembro de 2017 02/11/2017";
  "decisão de 2 de novembro de 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "decisão de 2 de novembro de 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO correria realmente o risco de sofrer tratamentos desumanos ou degradantes. Reino Unido."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Irlanda)"[label="prestou informações"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Printr‑o decizie din 2 noiembrie 2017, High Court (Înalta Curte, Irlanda), după ce a examinat susținerile lui RO referitoare la tratamentul pe care l‑ar putea suferi în Irlanda de Nord, a considerat că, potrivit unor informații precise și recente cu privire la condițiile de detenție din închisoarea din Maghaberry, se putea considera că, din cauza fragilității sale, RO risca în mod real să sufere tratamente inumane sau degradante. Aceasta a considerat necesar, în lumina Hotărârii din 5 aprilie 2016, Aranyosi și Căldăraru (C‑404/15 și C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), să solicite clarificări din partea autorităților din Regatul Unit cu privire la condițiile de detenție a lui RO în cazul predării.
La 16 aprilie 2018, autoritatea judiciară emitentă a mandatelor europene de arestare în cauză, Laganside Court in Belfast (Tribunalul din Laganside, Belfast, Regatul Unit), a comunicat informații cu privire la modul în care administrația penitenciarelor din Irlanda de Nord ar gestiona riscul ca RO să sufere tratamente inumane sau degradante în Irlanda de Nord.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irlanda)"->"a considerat necesar, să solicite clarificări din partea autorităților din Regatul Unit"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irlanda)"->"decizie din 2 noiembrie 2017 02/11/2017";
  "decizie din 2 noiembrie 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "decizie din 2 noiembrie 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO risca în mod real să sufere tratamente inumane sau degradante. Regatul Unit."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Irlanda)"[label="a comunicat informații"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Rozhodnutím z 2. novembra 2017 High Court (Vyšší súd, Írsko) po preskúmaní tvrdení RO týkajúcich sa zaobchádzania, ktorému by mohol byť vystavený v Severnom Írsku, dospel k záveru, že podľa presných a nedávnych informácií o podmienkach výkonu trestu odňatia slobody vo väznici v Maghaberry sa možno domnievať, že z dôvodu jeho zraniteľnosti existuje reálne riziko, že RO bude vystavený neľudskému alebo ponižujúcemu zaobchádzaniu. Vzhľadom na rozsudok z 5. apríla 2016, Aranyosi a Căldăraru (C‑404/15 a C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), považoval za nevyhnutné požiadať orgány Spojeného kráľovstva o objasnenie podmienok výkonu trestu odňatia slobody RO v prípade jeho odovzdania.
Dňa 16. apríla 2018 súdny orgán, ktorý vydal dotknuté európske zatykače, Laganside Court in Belfast (Laganside súd v Belfaste, Spojené kráľovstvo), oznámil informácie o spôsobe, akým bude Väzenská služba Severného Írska riešiť hrozby neľudského alebo ponižujúceho zaobchádzania s RO v Severnom Írsku.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Írsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Írsko)"->"nevyhnutné požiadať orgány Spojeného kráľovstva o objasnenie"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Írsko)"->"Rozhodnutím z 2. novembra 2017 High Court (Vyšší súd, Írsko) 02/11/2017";
  "Rozhodnutím z 2. novembra 2017 High Court (Vyšší súd, Írsko) 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "Rozhodnutím z 2. novembra 2017 High Court (Vyšší súd, Írsko) 02/11/2017"->"že z dôvodu jeho zraniteľnosti existuje reálne riziko, že RO bude vystavený neľudskému alebo ponižujúcemu zaobchádzaniu. Spojené kráľovstvo."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Írsko)"[label="oznámil informácie"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

V odločbi z dne 2. novembra 2017 je High Court (višje sodišče, Irska), potem ko je preučilo trditve osebe RO v zvezi z obravnavanjem, ki bi ga lahko bila deležna na Severnem Irskem, ugotovilo, da se zaradi konkretnih in ažurnih informacij glede razmer v zaporu Maghaberry, lahko domneva, da obstaja dejansko tveganje, da bo oseba RO zaradi svoje ranljivosti izpostavljena nečloveškemu in ponižujočemu ravnanju. Menilo je, da je treba ob upoštevanju sodbe z dne 5. aprila 2016, Aranyosi in Căldăraru (C‑404/15 in C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), od organov Združenega kraljestva zahtevati pojasnila glede razmer za zadržanje osebe RO, če bi bila predana.
Odreditveni pravosodni organ, Laganside Court in Belfast (sodišče Laganside v Belfastu, Združeno kraljestvo), ki je izdalo zadevna evropska naloga za prijetje, je 16. aprila 2018 predložilo informacije o tem, kako bo uprava Severne Irske za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij obvladovala tveganje, da bo oseba RO izpostavljena nečloveškemu in ponižujočemu ravnanju na Severnem Irskem.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irska)"->"da je treba ob upoštevanju sodbe z dne 5. aprila 2016, Aranyosi in Căldăraru (C‑404/15 in C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), od organov Združenega kraljestva zahtevati pojasnila glede razmer za zadržanje osebe RO, če bi bila predana."[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irska)"->"odločbi z dne 2. novembra 2017 02/11/2017";
  "odločbi z dne 2. novembra 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "odločbi z dne 2. novembra 2017 02/11/2017"->"Dejansko tveganje, da bo oseba RO zaradi svoje ranljivosti izpostavljena nečloveškemu in ponižujočemu ravnanju. Združeno kraljestvo."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Irska)"[label="16. aprila 2018 predložilo informacije o tem, kako bo uprava Severne Irske za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij obvladovala tveganje, da bo oseba RO izpostavljena nečloveškemu in ponižujočemu ravnanju na Severnem Irskem."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Tutkittuaan RO:n väitteet kohtelusta, jota hän voisi joutua kokemaan Pohjois-Irlannissa, High Court (ylempi piirituomioistuin, Irlanti) totesi 2.11.2017 antamassaan ratkaisussa, että Maghaberryn vankilaolosuhteita koskevien täsmällisten ja päivitettyjen tietojen perusteella oli olemassa todellinen vaara, että haavoittuvuutensa johdosta RO voisi joutua kokemaan epäinhimillistä tai halventavaa kohtelua. Se piti 5.4.2016 annetun tuomion Aranyosi ja Căldăraru (C‑404/15 ja C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198) valossa tarpeellisena pyytää Yhdistyneen kuningaskunnan viranomaisilta lisätietoja RO:n vankilaoloista, mikäli hänet luovutetaan.
Laganside Court in Belfast (Lagansiden tuomioistuin Belfastissa, Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta), joka on kyseessä olevat eurooppalaiset pidätysmääräykset antanut oikeusviranomainen, toimitti 16.4.2018 tietoja siitä, miten Pohjois-Irlannin vankeinhoitolaitoksessa otettaisiin huomioon vaara, että RO:hon kohdistuu Pohjois-Irlannissa epäinhimillistä tai halventavaa kohtelua.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irlanti)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irlanti)"->"tarpeellisena pyytää Yhdistyneen kuningaskunnan viranomaisilta lisätietoja"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irlanti)"->"2.11.2017 antamassaan ratkaisussa 02/11/2017";
  "2.11.2017 antamassaan ratkaisussa 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "2.11.2017 antamassaan ratkaisussa 02/11/2017"->"Oli olemassa todellinen vaara, että haavoittuvuutensa johdosta RO voisi joutua kokemaan epäinhimillistä tai halventavaa kohtelua. Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Irlanti)"[label="toimitti 16.4.2018 tietoja"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Minister for Justice and Equality v RO.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Grounds for non-execution — Article 50 TEU — Warrant issued by the judicial authorities of a Member State that has initiated the procedure for withdrawal from the European Union — Uncertainty as to the law applicable to the relationship between that State and the Union following withdrawal.
Case C-327/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Efter att ha undersökt RO:s påståenden rörande den behandling han eventuellt kunde komma att utsättas för i Nordirland slog High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål, Irland), i beslut av den 2 november 2017, fast att det, på grundval av specifika och aktuella uppgifter om förhållandena i Maghaberry-fängelset, kunde anses att det fanns en verklig risk för att RO, på grund av sin sårbarhet, skulle utsättas för omänsklig eller förnedrande behandling. Den domstolen ansåg det nödvändigt, mot bakgrund av dom av den 5 april 2016, Aranyosi och Căldăraru (C‑404/15 och C‑659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198), att begära förtydliganden från myndigheterna i Förenade kungariket om de förhållanden under vilka RO skulle hållas frihetsberövad om han överlämnades.
Den 16 april 2018 lämnade den rättsliga myndighet som utfärdat de europeiska arresteringsorderna, Laganside Court in Belfast (domstol i första instans i Belfast, Förenade kungariket), information om hur kriminalvårdsförvaltningen i Nordirland hade för avsikt att hantera risken för att RO utsattes för omänsklig eller förnedrande behandling i Nordirland.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RO"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "High Court (Irland)"->"nödvändigt, att begära förtydliganden från myndigheterna i Förenade kungariket"[dir=none];
  "High Court (Irland)"->"beslut av den 2 november 2017 02/11/2017";
  "beslut av den 2 november 2017 02/11/2017"->"RO";
  "beslut av den 2 november 2017 02/11/2017"->"det fanns en verklig risk för att RO, på grund av sin sårbarhet, skulle utsättas för omänsklig eller förnedrande behandling. Förenade kungariket."[dir=none];
  "Laganside Court in Belfast (United Kingdom)"->"High Court (Irland)"[label="lämnade information"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Hampshire County Council v C.E. and N.E.
References for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility — International child abduction — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 11 — Application for return — Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 — Application for a declaration of enforceability — Appeal — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Time limit for bringing the appeal — Order authorising enforcement — Enforcement prior to service of the order.
Joined Cases C-325/18 PPU and C-375/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

Родителите по настоящото дело, които са с британско гражданство, сключили са брак и са живели съвместно в Обединеното кралство, пристигат с ферибот в Ирландия на 5 септември 2017 г. с трите деца, едното от които е родено два дни по-рано. Г‑жа E. е майка на трите деца, а г‑н E. е баща само на най-малкото от тях.
През юни 2017 г. в Обединеното кралство за двете по-големи деца са взети решения за временно настаняване. Всъщност HCC вече е изразявал опасения по отношение на това семейство, по-специално относно хигиенните стандарти в дома, способността на родителите да се справят с поведението на децата, домашното насилие в предишни връзки и злоупотребата с наркотични вещества. Оказва се също, че едно от децата е претърпяло нараняване, което не се дължи на случаен инцидент, и не може да се изключи вероятността да е причинено от г‑н E.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Г‑жа E. E"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "г-н E. E"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "деца 1"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "деца 2"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "деца 3"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Г‑жа E. E"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"г-н E. E"[dir=none style=vold];
  ""->"деца 3"[dir=none style=bold];
  "Г‑жа E. E"->"деца 2"[dir=none style=bold];
  "Г‑жа E. E"->"деца 1"[dir=none style=bold];
  "решения за временно настаняване"->"деца 1";
  "решения за временно настаняване"->"деца 2";
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Hampshire County Council v C.E. and N.E.
References for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility — International child abduction — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 11 — Application for return — Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 — Application for a declaration of enforceability — Appeal — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Time limit for bringing the appeal — Order authorising enforcement — Enforcement prior to service of the order.
Joined Cases C-325/18 PPU and C-375/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Los progenitores afectados tienen nacionalidad británica, están casados y han vivido juntos en el Reino Unido. El 5 de septiembre de 2017 llegaron en transbordador a Irlanda con los tres menores, uno de los cuales había nacido dos días antes. La Sra. E. es la madre de los tres menores y el Sr. E. solo es el padre del de menor edad.
En junio de 2017 se habían adoptado en el Reino Unido resoluciones tutelares provisionales respecto de los dos hijos de mayor edad. En efecto, el HCC ya había expresado su inquietud respecto de esta familia, sobre todo en lo tocante al nivel de higiene en el hogar, la capacidad de los progenitores para controlar el comportamiento de sus hijos, la violencia doméstica en relaciones de pareja anteriores y problemas de drogodependencia. Además, uno de los menores había resultado herido de manera no accidental y no podía excluirse que el Sr. E. fuera su agresor.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Sra. E. E"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Sr. E. E"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "menores 1"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "menores 2"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "menores 3"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Sra. E. E"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"Sr. E. E"[dir=none style=vold];
  ""->"menores 3"[dir=none style=bold];
  "Sra. E. E"->"menores 2"[dir=none style=bold];
  "Sra. E. E"->"menores 1"[dir=none style=bold];
  "resoluciones tutelares provisionales"->"menores 1";
  "resoluciones tutelares provisionales"->"menores 2";
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Hampshire County Council v C.E. and N.E.
References for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility — International child abduction — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 11 — Application for return — Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 — Application for a declaration of enforceability — Appeal — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Time limit for bringing the appeal — Order authorising enforcement — Enforcement prior to service of the order.
Joined Cases C-325/18 PPU and C-375/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dotčení rodiče, kteří jsou britskými státními příslušníky, jsou sezdaní a žili společně ve Spojeném království, přicestovali do Irska dne 5. září 2017 trajektem se třemi dětmi, přičemž jedno z nich se narodilo dva dny předtím. Paní E. je matkou tří dětí a pan E. je otcem pouze nejmladšího ze tří dětí.
Na dvě starší děti se vztahovala rozhodnutí o přechodné péči vydaná ve Spojeném království v červnu roku 2017. HCC již ve vztahu k této rodině vyjádřila obavy týkající se zejména úrovně hygieny v domácnosti, schopnosti rodičů zvládat chování svých dětí, domácího násilí v předchozích partnerských vztazích a problémy spojené se zneužíváním návykových látek. Vyšlo rovněž najevo, že jedno z dětí utrpělo zranění, které nebylo způsobeno náhodou, a nebylo možné vyloučit, že toto zranění způsobil pan E.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Paní E. E"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "pan E. E"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dětí 1"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dětí 2"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "dětí 3"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Paní E. E"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"pan E. E"[dir=none style=vold];
  ""->"dětí 3"[dir=none style=bold];
  "Paní E. E"->"dětí 2"[dir=none style=bold];
  "Paní E. E"->"dětí 1"[dir=none style=bold];
  "rozhodnutí o přechodné péči"->"dětí 1";
  "rozhodnutí o přechodné péči"->"dětí 2";
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Hampshire County Council v C.E. and N.E.
References for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility — International child abduction — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 11 — Application for return — Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 — Application for a declaration of enforceability — Appeal — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Time limit for bringing the appeal — Order authorising enforcement — Enforcement prior to service of the order.
Joined Cases C-325/18 PPU and C-375/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

De pågældende forældre – der er britiske statsborgere, er gift og har boet sammen i Det Forenede Kongerige – ankom med færge til Irland den 5. september 2017 sammen med de tre børn, hvoraf det ene var født to dage forinden. Fru E. er moder til de tre børn, mens hr. E. kun er fader til det yngste af de tre børn.
De to ældste børn havde været genstand for afgørelser om midlertidig anbringelse, som var truffet i Det Forenede Kongerige i juni 2017. HCC havde således udtrykt bekymring vedrørende familien, bl.a. med hensyn til hygiejnestandarden i hjemmet, forældrenes evne til at styre deres børns opførsel, vold i hjemmet i tidligere forhold og problemer med stofmisbrug. Det viste sig også, at et af børnene havde pådraget sig en skade, der ikke var forårsaget af en hændelig ulykke, og muligheden for, at hr. E var gerningsmanden, kunne ikke udelukkes.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Fru E. E"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "hr. E. E"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "børn 1"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "børn 2"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "børn 3"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Fru E. E"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"hr. E. E"[dir=none style=vold];
  ""->"børn 3"[dir=none style=bold];
  "Fru E. E"->"børn 2"[dir=none style=bold];
  "Fru E. E"->"børn 1"[dir=none style=bold];
  "afgørelser om midlertidig anbringelse"->"børn 1";
  "afgørelser om midlertidig anbringelse"->"børn 2";
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Hampshire County Council v C.E. and N.E.
References for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility — International child abduction — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 11 — Application for return — Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 — Application for a declaration of enforceability — Appeal — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Time limit for bringing the appeal — Order authorising enforcement — Enforcement prior to service of the order.
Joined Cases C-325/18 PPU and C-375/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

Die betroffenen Eltern, die die britische Staatsangehörigkeit besitzen, miteinander verheiratet sind und zusammen im Vereinigten Königreich lebten, kamen am 5. September 2017 mit den drei Kindern, von denen eines zwei Tage zuvor zur Welt gekommen war, mit der Fähre in Irland an. Frau E. ist die Mutter der drei Kinder, und Herr E. ist der Vater des jüngsten der drei Kinder.
Für die beiden älteren Kinder waren im Juni 2017 im Vereinigten Königreich Anordnungen zur vorläufigen Unterbringung ergangen. Der HCC hatte nämlich bereits Bedenken hinsichtlich der Familie geäußert, u. a. wegen des Standards der häuslichen Hygiene, der Fähigkeit der Eltern zur Erziehung ihrer Kinder, häuslicher Gewalt in früheren Beziehungen sowie Drogenmissbrauchs. Wie sich außerdem herausstellte, hatte eines der Kinder eine Verletzung erlitten, die nicht auf einen Unfall zurückzuführen war und für die eine Täterschaft von Herrn E. nicht ausgeschlossen werden konnte.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Frau E. E"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Herr E. E"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kinder 1"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kinder 2"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Kinder 3"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Frau E. E"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"Herr E. E"[dir=none style=vold];
  ""->"Kinder 3"[dir=none style=bold];
  "Frau E. E"->"Kinder 2"[dir=none style=bold];
  "Frau E. E"->"Kinder 1"[dir=none style=bold];
  "Anordnungen zur vorläufigen Unterbringung"->"Kinder 1";
  "Anordnungen zur vorläufigen Unterbringung"->"Kinder 2";
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2018.
Hampshire County Council v C.E. and N.E.
References for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (Ireland).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility — International child abduction — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 11 — Application for return — Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 — Application for a declaration of enforceability — Appeal — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Time limit for bringing the appeal — Order authorising enforcement — Enforcement prior to service of the order.
Joined Cases C-325/18 PPU and C-375/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Briti kodanikest asjaomased vanemad, kes on abielus ja elanud koos Ühendkuningriigis, saabusid 5. septembril 2017 koos oma kolme lapsega, kellest üks oli sündinud kaks päeva varem, praamiga Iirimaale. C.E. on kõigi kolme lapse ema ja N.E. on kolmest lapsest ainult kõige noorema lapse isa.
Kahe vanema lapse suhtes olid 2017. aasta juunis tehtud Ühendkuningriigis otsused ajutisele asendushooldusele paigutamise kohta. HCC oli ka varem selle perega seoses muret väljendanud, eelkõige mis puudutab kodust hügieenistandardit, vanemate suutlikkust laste käitumist juhtida, koduvägivalda varasemates suhetes ja keelatud ainete kuritarvitamist. Samuti tuli ilmsiks, et üks laps oli saanud vigastuse, mis ei olnud põhjustatud õnnetusjuhtumist, ning ei ole välistatud, et selle võis põhjustada N.E.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "C.E. E"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "N.E. E"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "laps 1"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "laps 2"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "laps 3"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "C.E. E"->""[dir=none style=bold];
  ""->"N.E. E"[dir=none style=vold];
  ""->"laps 3"[dir=none style=bold];
  "C.E. E"->"laps 2"[dir=none style=bold];
  "C.E. E"->"laps 1"[dir=none style=bold];
  "ajutisele asendushooldusele paigutamise kohta."->"laps 1";
  "ajutisele asendushooldusele paigutamise kohta."->"laps 2";
    
}