mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: German

Die Klägerin des Ausgangsverfahrens stellte vor dem Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Regionales Verwaltungsgericht Latium – Rom, Italien) die Rechtmäßigkeit dieser Entscheidung sowie die Rechtmäßigkeit der nach Art. 1 Abs. 5 des Decreto-legge Nr. 8/2000 ergangenen Entscheidung der AGEA über die innerstaatliche Verrechnung für den Vermarktungszeitraum für Milch und Milcherzeugnisse vom 1. April 2000 bis 31. März 2001 in Frage.
Nachdem ihre Klage abgewiesen worden war, legte die Klägerin des Ausgangsverfahrens ein Rechtsmittel beim Consiglio di Stato (Staatsrat, Italien) ein.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Die Klägerin"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (Staatsrat, Italien))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Die Klägerin"->"stellte vor dem Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Regionales Verwaltungsgericht Latium – Rom, Italien) die Rechtmäßigkeit dieser Entscheidung in Frage.";
  "stellte vor dem Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Regionales Verwaltungsgericht Latium – Rom, Italien) die Rechtmäßigkeit dieser Entscheidung in Frage."->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "stellte vor dem Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Regionales Verwaltungsgericht Latium – Rom, Italien) die Rechtmäßigkeit dieser Entscheidung in Frage."->"die innerstaatliche Verrechnung für den Vermarktungszeitraum für Milch und Milcherzeugnisse 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Die Klägerin"[label="abgewiesen"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (Staatsrat, Italien))"[label="Rechtsmittel"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Põhikohtuasja kaebuse esitaja esitas Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Romale (Lazio maakonna halduskohus, Rooma kohtumaja, Itaalia) kaebuse selle otsuse, samuti AGEA poolt dekreetseaduse nr 8/2000 artikli 1 lõike 5 alusel vastu võetud otsuse, mis käsitles riigisisest tasakaalustamist piima ja piimatoodete turustamisperioodil 1. aprillist 2000 kuni 31. märtsini 2001, seaduslikkuse vaidlustamiseks.
Kuna kaebus jäeti rahuldamata, kaebas põhikohtuasja kaebuse esitaja selle peale edasi Consiglio di Statole (Itaalia kõrgeima halduskohtuna tegutsev riiginõukogu).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "kaebuse esitaja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Statole)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "kaebuse esitaja"->"seaduslikkuse vaidlustamiseks.";
  "seaduslikkuse vaidlustamiseks."->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "seaduslikkuse vaidlustamiseks."->"riigisisest tasakaalustamist piima ja piimatoodete turustamisperioodil 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"kaebuse esitaja"[label="kaebus jäeti rahuldamata"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Statole)"[label="kaebus"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Η εκκαλούσα της κύριας δίκης αμφισβήτησε ενώπιον του Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (περιφερειακού διοικητικού πρωτοδικείου Λατίου – εδρεύον στη Ρώμη, Ιταλία), τη νομιμότητα της απόφασης αυτής καθώς και της απόφασης της AGEA, η οποία είχε εκδοθεί δυνάμει του άρθρου 1, παράγραφος 5, του κυβερνητικού διατάγματος 8/2000, σχετικά με την εθνική ανακατανομή για την περίοδο εμπορίας γάλακτος και γαλακτοκομικών προϊόντων από 1ης Απριλίου 2000 έως 31 Μαρτίου 2001.
Δεδομένου ότι η προσφυγή της απορρίφθηκε, η εκκαλούσα της κύριας δίκης άσκησε έφεση ενώπιον του Consiglio di Stato (Συμβούλιου της Επικρατείας, Ιταλία).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Η εκκαλούσα της κύριας δίκης"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Συμβούλιου της Επικρατείας, Ιταλία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Η εκκαλούσα της κύριας δίκης"->"αμφισβήτησε τη νομιμότητα της απόφασης";
  "αμφισβήτησε τη νομιμότητα της απόφασης"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "αμφισβήτησε τη νομιμότητα της απόφασης"->"εθνική ανακατανομή για την περίοδο εμπορίας γάλακτος και γαλακτοκομικών προϊόντων 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Η εκκαλούσα της κύριας δίκης"[label="απορρίφθηκε"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Συμβούλιου της Επικρατείας, Ιταλία)"[label="έφεση"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: French

La requérante au principal a contesté devant le Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (tribunal administratif régional du Latium – siège de Rome, Italie) la légalité de cette décision ainsi que de la décision de l’AGEA, adoptée au titre de l’article 1er, paragraphe 5, du décret-loi no 8/2000, ayant pour objet la péréquation nationale pour la période de commercialisation du lait et des produits laitiers allant du 1er avril 2000 au 31 mars 2001.
Son recours ayant été rejeté, la requérante au principal a interjeté appel devant le Consiglio di Stato (Conseil d’État, Italie).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "La requérante au principal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Conseil d’État, Italie)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "La requérante au principal"->"a contesté devant le Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (tribunal administratif régional du Latium – siège de Rome, Italie) la légalité de cette décision";
  "a contesté devant le Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (tribunal administratif régional du Latium – siège de Rome, Italie) la légalité de cette décision"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "a contesté devant le Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (tribunal administratif régional du Latium – siège de Rome, Italie) la légalité de cette décision"->"la péréquation nationale pour la période de commercialisation du lait et des produits laitiers 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"La requérante au principal"[label="rejeté"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Conseil d’État, Italie)"[label="appel"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Tužitelj u glavnom postupku je pred Tribunalom amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Okružni upravni sud u Laciju – sjedište u Rimu, Italija) osporio zakonitost te odluke kao i zakonitost AGEA‑ine odluke, donesene na temelju članka 1. stavka 5. Uredbe sa zakonskom snagom br. 8/2000 o nacionalnom izjednačavanju za razdoblje stavljanja na tržište mlijeka i mliječnih proizvoda od 1. travnja 2000. do 31. ožujka 2001.
Nakon što je njegova tužba odbijena, tužitelj u glavnom postupku podnio je žalbu Consigliu di Stato (Državno vijeće, Italija).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tužitelj"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Državno vijeće, Italija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Tužitelj"->"osporio zakonitost te odluke";
  "osporio zakonitost te odluke"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "osporio zakonitost te odluke"->"nacionalnom izjednačavanju za razdoblje stavljanja na tržište mlijeka i mliječnih proizvoda 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Tužitelj"[label="odbijena"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Državno vijeće, Italija)"[label="žalbu"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

La ricorrente di cui al procedimento principale ha contestato dinanzi al Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Italia) la legittimità della decisione suddetta, nonché quella della decisione dell’AGEA, adottata ai sensi dell’articolo 1, comma 5, del decreto‑legge n. 8/2000, avente ad oggetto la compensazione nazionale per il periodo di commercializzazione del latte e dei prodotti lattiero-caseari che va dal 1o aprile 2000 al 31 marzo 2001.
A seguito del rigetto del ricorso da essa proposto, la ricorrente di cui al procedimento principale ha interposto appello dinanzi al Consiglio di Stato (Italia).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "La ricorrente"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (Italia))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "La ricorrente"->"ha contestato dinanzi al Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Italia) la legittimità della decisione suddetta";
  "ha contestato dinanzi al Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Italia) la legittimità della decisione suddetta"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "ha contestato dinanzi al Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Italia) la legittimità della decisione suddetta"->"la compensazione nazionale per il periodo di commercializzazione del latte e dei prodotti lattiero-caseari 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"La ricorrente"[label="rigetto del ricorso"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (Italia))"[label="appello"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Prasītāja pamatlietā ir apstrīdējusi Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Lacio Reģionālā administratīvā tiesa Romā, Itālija) šī lēmuma, kā arī AGEA lēmuma, kas pieņemts saskaņā ar Dekrētlikuma Nr. 8/2000 1. panta 5. punktu, par piena kvotu izlīdzināšanu valsts līmenī piena un piena produktu tirdzniecības laikposmā no 2000. gada 1. aprīļa līdz 2001. gada 31. martam tiesiskumu.
Tā kā prasītājas pamatlietā prasība tika noraidīta, tā iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību Consiglio di Stato (Valsts padome, Itālija).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Prasītāja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Valsts padome, Itālija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Prasītāja"->"apstrīdējusi Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Lacio Reģionālā administratīvā tiesa Romā, Itālija) šī lēmuma tiesiskumu";
  "apstrīdējusi Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Lacio Reģionālā administratīvā tiesa Romā, Itālija) šī lēmuma tiesiskumu"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "apstrīdējusi Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Lacio Reģionālā administratīvā tiesa Romā, Itālija) šī lēmuma tiesiskumu"->"piena kvotu izlīdzināšanu valsts līmenī piena un piena produktu tirdzniecības 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Prasītāja"[label="noraidīta"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Valsts padome, Itālija)"[label="apelācijas sūdzību"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Pareiškėja pagrindinėje byloje užginčijo šio sprendimo ir AGEA sprendimo, priimto pagal Dekreto įstatymo Nr. 8/2000 dėl pieno kvotų tarpuskaitos laikotarpiu nuo 2000 m. balandžio 1 d. iki 2001 m. kovo 31 d. pieno ir pieno gaminių prekybos laikotarpiu 1 straipsnio 5 dalį, teisėtumą Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Lacijaus regiono administracinis teismas, Romos būstinė, Italija).
Kadangi jos skundas buvo atmestas, pareiškėja pagrindinėje byloje pateikė apeliacinį skundą Consiglio di Stato (Valstybės Taryba, Italija).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Pareiškėja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Valstybės Taryba, Italija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Pareiškėja"->"užginčijo šio sprendimo ir AGEA sprendimo, priimto pagal Dekreto įstatymo Nr. 8/2000 dėl pieno kvotų tarpuskaitos laikotarpiu nuo 2000 m. balandžio 1 d. iki 2001 m. kovo 31 d. pieno ir pieno gaminių prekybos laikotarpiu 1 straipsnio 5 dalį, teisėtumą";
  "užginčijo šio sprendimo ir AGEA sprendimo, priimto pagal Dekreto įstatymo Nr. 8/2000 dėl pieno kvotų tarpuskaitos laikotarpiu nuo 2000 m. balandžio 1 d. iki 2001 m. kovo 31 d. pieno ir pieno gaminių prekybos laikotarpiu 1 straipsnio 5 dalį, teisėtumą"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "užginčijo šio sprendimo ir AGEA sprendimo, priimto pagal Dekreto įstatymo Nr. 8/2000 dėl pieno kvotų tarpuskaitos laikotarpiu nuo 2000 m. balandžio 1 d. iki 2001 m. kovo 31 d. pieno ir pieno gaminių prekybos laikotarpiu 1 straipsnio 5 dalį, teisėtumą"->"pieno ir pieno gaminių prekybos laikotarpiu 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Pareiškėja"[label="atmestas"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Valstybės Taryba, Italija)"[label="apeliacinį skundą"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Az alapeljárás felperese a Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Lazio tartomány római székhelyű közigazgatási bírósága, Olaszország) – előtt vitatta e határozat, valamint az AEGA által a 8/2000. sz. rendkívüli törvényerejű rendelet 1. cikkének (5) bekezdése alapján a tej és a tejtermékek 2000. április 1‑jétől 2001. március 31‑ig tartó forgalmazási időszakára vonatkozó nemzeti elszámolás tárgyában hozott határozatot.
Mivel a bíróság elutasította a keresetét, az alapeljárás felperese fellebbezést nyújtott be a Consiglio di Statohoz (államtanács, Olaszország).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Az alapeljárás felperese"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (államtanács, Olaszország))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Az alapeljárás felperese"->"vitatta e határozat";
  "vitatta e határozat"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "vitatta e határozat"->"a tej és a tejtermékek 2000. április 1‑jétől 2001. március 31‑ig tartó forgalmazási időszakára vonatkozó nemzeti elszámolás 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Az alapeljárás felperese"[label="elutasította"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (államtanács, Olaszország))"[label="fellebbezést nyújtott be"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Ir-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali kkontestat quddiem it-Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (il-Qorti Amministrattiva Reġjonali ta’ Lazio – sede ta’ Ruma, l-Italja) il-legalità ta’ din id-deċiżjoni kif ukoll tad-deċiżjoni tal-AGEA, adottata skont l-Artikolu 1(5) tad-Digriet Leġiżlattiv Nru 8/2000, li għandha bħala suġġett l-aġġustament nazzjonali għall-perijodu ta’ kummerċjalizzazzjoni tal-ħalib u tal-prodotti tal-ħalib ta’ bejn l‑1 ta’ April 2000 u l‑31 ta’ Marzu 2001.
Peress li r-rikors tagħha ġie miċħud, ir-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali appellat quddiem il-Consiglio di Stato (il-Kunsill tal-Istat, l-Italja).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Ir-rikorrenti"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (il-Consiglio di Stato (il-Kunsill tal-Istat, l-Italja))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Ir-rikorrenti"->"Ir-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali kkontestat quddiem it-Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (il-Qorti Amministrattiva Reġjonali ta’ Lazio – sede ta’ Ruma, l-Italja) il-legalità ta’ din id-deċiżjoni";
  "Ir-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali kkontestat quddiem it-Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (il-Qorti Amministrattiva Reġjonali ta’ Lazio – sede ta’ Ruma, l-Italja) il-legalità ta’ din id-deċiżjoni"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "Ir-rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali kkontestat quddiem it-Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (il-Qorti Amministrattiva Reġjonali ta’ Lazio – sede ta’ Ruma, l-Italja) il-legalità ta’ din id-deċiżjoni"->"l-aġġustament nazzjonali għall-perijodu ta’ kummerċjalizzazzjoni tal-ħalib u tal-prodotti tal-ħalib 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Ir-rikorrenti"[label="miċħud"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (il-Consiglio di Stato (il-Kunsill tal-Istat, l-Italja))"[label="appellat"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding heeft bij de Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (bestuursrechter in eerste aanleg voor de regio Latium – locatie Rome, Italië) de wettigheid betwist van dit besluit en van het door AGEA krachtens artikel 1, lid 5, van voorlopig wetsbesluit nr. 8/2000 vastgesteld besluit betreffende de nationale compensatie voor melk en zuivelproducten die in het verkoopseizoen van 1 april 2000 tot en met 31 maart 2001 op de markt zijn gebracht.
Nadat haar beroep is verworpen, heeft verzoekster in het hoofdgeding hoger beroep ingesteld bij de Consiglio di Stato (hoogste bestuursrechter, Italië).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (hoogste bestuursrechter, Italië))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding"->"de wettigheid betwist van dit besluit";
  "de wettigheid betwist van dit besluit"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "de wettigheid betwist van dit besluit"->"de nationale compensatie voor melk en zuivelproducten 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Verzoekster in het hoofdgeding"[label="beroep is verworpen"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (hoogste bestuursrechter, Italië))"[label="hoger beroep"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Skarżąca w postępowaniu głównym zakwestionowała przed Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (regionalnym sądem administracyjnym dla Lacjum – z siedzibą w Rzymie, Włochy) zgodność z prawem tej decyzji, a także decyzji AGEA przyjętej na podstawie art. 1 ust. 5 rozporządzenia z mocą ustawy nr 8/2000, której przedmiotem jest wyrównanie krajowe za okresu sprzedaży mleka i produktów mlecznych od dnia 1 kwietnia 2000 r. do dnia 31 marca 2001 r.
W związku z tym, że jej skarga została oddalona, skarżąca w postępowaniu głównym wniosła odwołanie do Consiglio di Stato (rady stanu, Włochy).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Skarżąca"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (rady stanu, Włochy))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Skarżąca"->"zakwestionowała przed Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (regionalnym sądem administracyjnym dla Lacjum – z siedzibą w Rzymie, Włochy) zgodność z prawem tej decyzji";
  "zakwestionowała przed Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (regionalnym sądem administracyjnym dla Lacjum – z siedzibą w Rzymie, Włochy) zgodność z prawem tej decyzji"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "zakwestionowała przed Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (regionalnym sądem administracyjnym dla Lacjum – z siedzibą w Rzymie, Włochy) zgodność z prawem tej decyzji"->"wyrównanie krajowe za okresu sprzedaży mleka i produktów mlecznych 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Skarżąca"[label="oddalona"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (rady stanu, Włochy))"[label="odwołanie"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

A recorrente no processo principal impugnou no Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio — sede di Roma (Tribunal Administrativo Regional do Lácio — Roma, Itália) a legalidade desta decisão e da decisão da AGEA, adotada ao abrigo do artigo 1.o, n.o 5, do Decreto‑Lei n.o 8/2000, que tinha por objeto a perequação nacional para o período de comercialização do leite e dos produtos lácteos entre 1 de abril de 2000 e 31 de março de 2001.
Tendo sido negado provimento ao seu recurso, a recorrente no processo principal recorreu para o Consiglio di Stato (Conselho de Estado, em formação jurisdicional, Itália).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "A recorrente"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Conselho de Estado, Itália)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "A recorrente"->"Impugnou no Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio — sede di Roma (Tribunal Administrativo Regional do Lácio — Roma, Itália) a legalidade desta decisão";
  "Impugnou no Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio — sede di Roma (Tribunal Administrativo Regional do Lácio — Roma, Itália) a legalidade desta decisão"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "Impugnou no Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio — sede di Roma (Tribunal Administrativo Regional do Lácio — Roma, Itália) a legalidade desta decisão"->"a perequação nacional para o período de comercialização do leite e dos produtos lácteos 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"A recorrente"[label="negado provimento"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Conselho de Estado, Itália)"[label="recurso"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Reclamanta din litigiul principal a contestat în fața Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Tribunalul Administrativ Regional din Lazio – sediul din Roma, Italia) legalitatea acestei decizii, precum și a deciziei AGEA, adoptată în temeiul articolului 1 alineatul 5 din Decretul‑lege nr. 8/2000, având ca obiect egalizarea națională pentru perioada de comercializare a laptelui și a produselor lactate cuprinsă între 1 aprilie 2000 și 31 martie 2001.
Întrucât acțiunea sa a fost respinsă, reclamanta din litigiul principal a declarat apel la Consiglio di Stato (Consiliul de Stat, Italia).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Reclamanta"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiliul de Stat, Italia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Reclamanta"->"a contestat în fața Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Tribunalul Administrativ Regional din Lazio – sediul din Roma, Italia) legalitatea acestei decizii";
  "a contestat în fața Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Tribunalul Administrativ Regional din Lazio – sediul din Roma, Italia) legalitatea acestei decizii"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "a contestat în fața Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Tribunalul Administrativ Regional din Lazio – sediul din Roma, Italia) legalitatea acestei decizii"->"egalizarea națională pentru perioada de comercializare a laptelui și a produselor lactate 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Reclamanta"[label="respinsă"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiliul de Stat, Italia)"[label="apel"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Odvolateľka vo veci samej spochybnila pred Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Regionálny správny súd Lazio – sídlo v Ríme, Taliansko) zákonnosť tohto rozhodnutia, ako aj rozhodnutia AGEA prijatého na základe článku 1 ods. 5 zákonného dekrétu č. 8/2000, ktorého cieľom bolo vyrovnanie na národnej úrovni za obdobie predaja mlieka a mliečnych výrobkov od 1. apríla 2000 do 31. marca 2001.
Keďže jej žaloba bola zamietnutá, odvolateľka vo veci samej sa odvolala na Consiglio di Stato (Štátna rada, Taliansko).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Odvolateľka vo veci samej"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Štátna rada, Taliansko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Odvolateľka vo veci samej"->"spochybnila zákonnosť tohto rozhodnutia";
  "spochybnila zákonnosť tohto rozhodnutia"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "spochybnila zákonnosť tohto rozhodnutia"->"vyrovnanie na národnej úrovni za obdobie predaja mlieka a mliečnych výrobkov 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Odvolateľka vo veci samej"[label="zamietnutá"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Štátna rada, Taliansko)"[label="odvolala"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Tožeča stranka v postopku v glavni stvari je pred Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (deželno upravno sodišče v Laciju – sedež v Rimu, Italija) izpodbijala zakonitost te odločbe ter zakonitost odločbe, ki jo je AGEA sprejela v skladu s členom 1(5) uredbe-zakona št. 8/2000 o državnem nadomestilu za trženje mleka in mlečnih izdelkov v obdobju med 1. aprilom 2000 in 31. marcem 2001.
Ker je bila njena tožba zavrnjena, je tožeča stranka v postopku v glavni stvari vložila pritožbo pri Consiglio di Stato (državni svet, Italija).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tožeča stranka"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (državni svet, Italija))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Tožeča stranka"->"izpodbijala zakonitost te odločbe";
  "izpodbijala zakonitost te odločbe"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "izpodbijala zakonitost te odločbe"->"državnem nadomestilu za trženje mleka in mlečnih izdelkov 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Tožeča stranka"[label="zavrnjena"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (državni svet, Italija))"[label="pritožbo"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Pääasian kantaja riitautti Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Romassa (Lazion alueellinen hallintotuomioistuin, Rooman toimipaikka, Italia) kyseisen päätöksen laillisuuden; se riitautti myös maidon ja maitotuotteiden markkinointijakson 1.4.2000–31.3.2001 osalta suoritettavasta kansallisesta tasaamisesta AGEA:n asetuksen nro 8/2000 1 §:n 5 momentin nojalla tekemän päätöksen laillisuuden.
Pääasian kantajan kanne hylättiin, ja se haki ratkaisuun muutosta Consiglio di Statolta (ylin hallintotuomioistuin, Italia).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Pääasian kantaja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (ylin hallintotuomioistuin, Italia))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Pääasian kantaja"->"riitautti kyseisen päätöksen laillisuuden";
  "riitautti kyseisen päätöksen laillisuuden"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "riitautti kyseisen päätöksen laillisuuden"->"maidon ja maitotuotteiden markkinointijakson 1.4.2000–31.3.2001 osalta suoritettavasta kansallisesta tasaamisesta 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Pääasian kantaja"[label="kanne hylättiin"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (ylin hallintotuomioistuin, Italia))"[label="haki ratkaisuun muutosta"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Klaganden i det nationella målet överklagade det beslutet och bestred dess lagenlighet, samt AGEA:s beslut som antagits enligt artikel 1.5 i lagdekret nr 8/2000, om den nationella kompensationsordningen för mjölkkvoter, för regleringsperioden 1 april 2000–31 mars 2001 för mjölk och mjölkprodukter till Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio – sede di Roma (Regionala förvaltningsdomstolen i Lazio – avdelningen i Rom, Italien).
Nämnda domstol ogillade det överklagandet. Klaganden i det nationella målet överklagade därför till Consiglio di Stato (Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Italien).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Klaganden"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Italien))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Klaganden"->"bestred dess lagenlighet";
  "bestred dess lagenlighet"->"Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio";
  "bestred dess lagenlighet"->"den nationella kompensationsordningen för mjölkkvoter, för regleringsperioden 1 april 2000–31 mars 2001 för mjölk och mjölkprodukter 01/04/2000 – 31/03/2001"[dir=none];
  "Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio"->"Klaganden"[label="ogillade"];
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consiglio di Stato (Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Italien))"[label="överklagade"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

Тъй като жалбата му е отхвърлена, жалбоподателят в главното производство обжалва по въззивен ред пред Consiglio di Stato (Държавен съвет, Италия).
Жалбоподателят в главното производство смята, че законовите разпоредби, които съдържат приложените спрямо него правила за преразпределяне, и в частност член 1, параграф 8 от Наредба-закон № 43/1999 и член 1, параграф 5 от Наредба-закон № 8/2000, са в противоречие с регламенти № 3950/92 и № 536/93. Всъщност, като предвидил, че размерът на допълнителната такса се определя след преразпределяне на неизползваните референтни количества по приоритетни категории, италианският законодател действал в нарушение на член 2, параграф 1 от Регламент № 3950/92, който задължавал държавите членки, когато решат да преразпределят неизползваните референтни количества, да прилагат паритетен и пропорционален критерий без никакво изключение.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Жалбоподателят"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Държавен съвет, Италия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Държавен съвет, Италия)"[label="жалбата"];
  "Жалбоподателят"->"член 1, параграф 8 от Наредба-закон № 43/1999 и член 1, параграф 5 от Наредба-закон № 8/2000, са в противоречие с регламенти № 3950/92 и № 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Tras la desestimación de su recurso, la recurrente en el litigio principal interpuso recurso de apelación ante el Consiglio di Stato (Consejo de Estado, Italia).
La recurrente en el litigio principal considera que las disposiciones legales que establecen las modalidades de redistribución que le fueron aplicadas, entre otros el artículo 1, apartado 8, del Decreto-ley n.o 43/1999 y el artículo 1, apartado 5, del Decreto-ley n.o 8/2000, son contrarios a los Reglamentos n.os 3950/92 y 536/93. En efecto, a su juicio, al establecer que la tasa suplementaria se determina tras reasignar las cantidades de referencia no utilizadas según las categorías prioritarias, el legislador italiano vulneró el artículo 2, apartado 1, del Reglamento n.o 3950/92, que —en su opinión— impone, en caso de que los Estados miembros opten por reasignar las cantidades de referencia no utilizadas, un criterio paritario y proporcional que no admite ninguna excepción.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "La recurrente en el litigio principal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Consejo de Estado, Italia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Consejo de Estado, Italia)"[label="recurso de apelación"];
  "La recurrente en el litigio principal"->"las disposiciones legales que establecen las modalidades de redistribución que le fueron aplicadas, entre otros el artículo 1, apartado 8, del Decreto-ley n.o 43/1999 y el artículo 1, apartado 5, del Decreto-ley n.o 8/2000, son contrarios a los Reglamentos n.os 3950/92 y 536/93."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.
Case C-348/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Vzhledem k tomu, že její žaloba byla zamítnuta, žalobkyně ve věci v původním řízení podala odvolání u Consiglio di Stato (Státní rada, Itálie).
Žalobkyně ve věci v původním řízení má za to, že právní ustanovení stanovící podmínky přerozdělení, která byla vůči ní použita, zejména čl. 1 odst. 8 nařízení vlády s mocí zákona č. 43/1999 a čl. 1 odst. 5 nařízení vlády s mocí zákona č. 8/2000, jsou v rozporu s nařízeními č. 3950/92 a č. 536/93. Italský zákonodárce totiž tím, že stanovil, že se doplňková dávka vyčíslí až po přerozdělení nevyužitých referenčních množství podle prioritních kategorií, podle ní porušil čl. 2 odst. 1 nařízení č. 3950/92, který ukládá v případě, že se členské státy rozhodnou přerozdělit nevyužitá referenční množství, rovnocenné a proporcionální kritérium, od něhož se nelze nikterak odchýlit.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Žalobkyně"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Consiglio di Stato (Státní rada, Itálie)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Applicant"->"Consiglio di Stato (Státní rada, Itálie)"[label="odvolání"];
  "Žalobkyně"->"čl. 1 odst. 8 nařízení vlády s mocí zákona č. 43/1999 a čl. 1 odst. 5 nařízení vlády s mocí zákona č. 8/2000, jsou v rozporu s nařízeními č. 3950/92 a č. 536/93."[dir=none];
}