mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Ezt követően az MSC megállapította, hogy 2010 májusa és 2013 szeptembere között ugyanezen vitatott engedély alapján, 8226,03 euró összegben beszedéseket teljesítettek a számlájáról (a továbbiakban: vitatott beszedések). A 2016. augusztus 3‑i levélben kérte a BCP‑bankot, hogy ezt az összeget is térítse vissza neki, amit e bank megtagadott.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "BCP Bank" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "2016. augusztus 3‑i levél 03/08/2016";
    "2016. augusztus 3‑i levél 03/08/2016"-> "BCP Bank";
    "2016. augusztus 3‑i levél 03/08/2016"-> "A 2016. augusztus 3‑i levélben kérte a BCP‑bankot, hogy ezt az összeget is térítse vissza neki"[dir=none];
    "BCP Bank"->"MSC" [label="e bank megtagadott."];
    "MSC"->"2010 májusa és 2013 szeptembere között ugyanezen vitatott engedély alapján, 8226,03 euró összegben beszedéseket teljesítettek a számlájáról 09/2013" [dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Sussegwentement, MSC ikkonstatat li, bejn ix-xahar ta’ Mejju 2010 u x-xahar ta’ Settembru 2013, kienu saru debiti diretti mill-kont tagħha abbażi tal-istess awtorizzazzjoni kontenzjuża għal ammont totali ta’ EUR 8 226.03 (iktar ’il quddiem id-“debiti diretti kontenzjużi”). B’ittra tat-3 ta’ Awwissu 2016, hija talbet lill-bank BCP iħallasha lura wkoll din is-somma, u dan tal-aħħar irrifjuta li jagħmel dan.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "BCP Bank" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "Ittra tat-3 ta’ Awwissu 2016 03/08/2016";
    "Ittra tat-3 ta’ Awwissu 2016 03/08/2016"-> "BCP Bank";
    "Ittra tat-3 ta’ Awwissu 2016 03/08/2016"-> "B’ittra tat-3 ta’ Awwissu 2016, hija talbet lill-bank BCP iħallasha lura wkoll din is-somma"[dir=none];
    "BCP Bank"->"MSC" [label="Irrifjuta li jagħmel dan"];
    "MSC"->"09/2013 09/2013" [dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

MSC heeft vervolgens vastgesteld dat in de periode van mei 2010 tot september 2013 op basis van dezelfde litigieuze instemming automatische afschrijvingen van haar rekening waren gebeurd voor in totaal 8226,03 EUR (hierna: „litigieuze automatische afschrijvingen”). Bij brief van 3 augustus 2016 heeft zij de bank BCP verzocht om haar ook dat bedrag terug te betalen, wat deze heeft geweigerd.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "BCP Bank" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "Bij brief van 3 augustus 2016 heeft zij de bank BCP verzocht om haar ook dat bedrag terug te betalen, wat deze heeft geweigerd. 03/08/2016";
    "Bij brief van 3 augustus 2016 heeft zij de bank BCP verzocht om haar ook dat bedrag terug te betalen, wat deze heeft geweigerd. 03/08/2016"-> "BCP Bank";
    "Bij brief van 3 augustus 2016 heeft zij de bank BCP verzocht om haar ook dat bedrag terug te betalen, wat deze heeft geweigerd. 03/08/2016"-> "Bij brief van 3 augustus 2016 heeft zij de bank BCP verzocht om haar ook dat bedrag terug te betalen"[dir=none];
    "BCP Bank"->"MSC" [label="wat deze heeft geweigerd."];
    "MSC"->"09/2013 09/2013" [dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Następnie MSC stwierdził, że w okresie od maja 2010 r. do września 2013 r. zrealizowano polecenia zapłaty obciążające jej rachunek na podstawie tej samej spornej autoryzacji na łączną kwotę 8226,03 EUR (zwane dalej „spornymi poleceniami zapłaty”). Pismem z dnia 3 sierpnia 2016 r. spółka zażądała od banku BCP zwrotu również tej kwoty, czego bank odmówił.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "BCP Bank" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "Pismem z dnia 3 sierpnia 2016 r. 03/08/2016";
    "Pismem z dnia 3 sierpnia 2016 r. 03/08/2016"-> "BCP Bank";
    "Pismem z dnia 3 sierpnia 2016 r. 03/08/2016"-> "Spółka zażądała od banku BCP zwrotu również tej kwoty"[dir=none];
    "BCP Bank"->"MSC" [label="bank odmówił"];
    "MSC"->"Następnie MSC stwierdził, że w okresie od maja 2010 r. do września 2013 r. zrealizowano polecenia zapłaty obciążające jej rachunek na podstawie tej samej spornej autoryzacji na łączną kwotę 8226,03 EUR 09/2013" [dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Posteriormente, a MSC apurou que, entre maio de 2010 e setembro de 2013, tinham sido realizados débitos diretos na sua conta, com base na mesma autorização controvertida, no valor de 8226,03 euros (a seguir «débitos controvertidos»). Por carta de 3 de agosto de 2016, a recorrente pediu igualmente ao banco BCP a devolução desta quantia, o que este recusou.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "BCP Bank" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "Por carta de 3 de agosto de 2016 03/08/2016";
    "Por carta de 3 de agosto de 2016 03/08/2016"-> "BCP Bank";
    "Por carta de 3 de agosto de 2016 03/08/2016"-> "a recorrente pediu igualmente ao banco BCP a devolução desta quantia"[dir=none];
    "BCP Bank"->"MSC" [label="o que este recusou."];
    "MSC"->"tinham sido realizados débitos diretos na sua conta, com base na mesma autorização controvertida, no valor de 8226,03 euros entre maio de 2010 e setembro de 2013 09/2013" [dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Ulterior, MSC a constatat că, între luna mai 2010 și luna septembrie 2013, fuseseră efectuate debitări din contul său pe baza aceleiași autorizații în litigiu, în cuantum total de 8226,03 euro (denumite în continuare „debitările în litigiu”). Printr‑o scrisoare din 3 august 2016, ea a solicitat băncii BCP să îi ramburseze și această sumă, ceea ce aceasta a refuzat.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "BCP Bank" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "Printr‑o scrisoare din 3 august 2016 03/08/2016";
    "Printr‑o scrisoare din 3 august 2016 03/08/2016"-> "BCP Bank";
    "Printr‑o scrisoare din 3 august 2016 03/08/2016"-> "Printr‑o scrisoare din 3 august 2016, ea a solicitat băncii BCP să îi ramburseze și această sumă"[dir=none];
    "BCP Bank"->"MSC" [label="cea ce aceasta a refuzat."];
    "MSC"->"Ulterior, MSC a constatat că, între luna mai 2010 și luna septembrie 2013, fuseseră efectuate debitări din contul său pe baza aceleiași autorizații în litigiu, în cuantum total de 8226,03 euro 09/2013" [dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Následne MSC zistila, že v období od mája 2010 do septembra 2013 boli z jej účtu odpísané sumy inkasa na základe toho istého sporného súhlasu s inkasom v celkovej výške 8226,03 eura (ďalej len „sporné inkaso“). Listom z 3. augusta 2016 požiadala banku BCP o vrátenie tejto sumy, čo táto banka odmietla.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "BCP Bank" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "Listom z 3. augusta 2016 03/08/2016";
    "Listom z 3. augusta 2016 03/08/2016"-> "BCP Bank";
    "Listom z 3. augusta 2016 03/08/2016"-> "Listom z 3. augusta 2016 požiadala banku BCP o vrátenie tejto sumy"[dir=none];
    "BCP Bank"->"MSC" [label="odmietla"];
    "MSC"->"v období od mája 2010 do septembra 2013 boli z jej účtu odpísané sumy inkasa na základe toho istého sporného súhlasu s inkasom v celkovej výške 8226,03 eura 09/2013" [dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Družba MSC je nato ugotovila, da so bile med majem 2010 in septembrom 2013 izvršene direktne bremenitve z njenega računa na podlagi iste sporne odobritve v skupnem znesku 8226,03 EUR (v nadaljevanju: sporne direktne bremenitve). Z dopisom z dne 3. avgusta 2016 je od banke BCP zahtevala, naj ji povrne tudi ta znesek, kar pa je slednja zavrnila.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "BCP Bank" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "Dopisom z dne 3. avgusta 2016 03/08/2016";
    "Dopisom z dne 3. avgusta 2016 03/08/2016"-> "BCP Bank";
    "Dopisom z dne 3. avgusta 2016 03/08/2016"-> "Z dopisom z dne 3. avgusta 2016 je od banke BCP zahtevala, naj ji povrne tudi ta znesek"[dir=none];
    "BCP Bank"->"MSC" [label="zavrnila"];
    "MSC"->"Med majem 2010 in septembrom 2013 so bile izvršene direktne bremenitve z njenega računa na podlagi iste sporne odobritve v skupnem znesku 8226,03 EUR 09/2013" [dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Tämän jälkeen MSC totesi, että vuoden 2010 toukokuun ja vuoden 2013 syyskuun välillä sen tililtä oli saman riidanalaisen hyväksynnän perusteella tehty suoraveloituksia, joiden kokonaismäärä oli 8226,03 euroa (jäljempänä riidanalaiset suoraveloitukset). Se vaati 3.8.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellä BCP-pankkia palauttamaan sille myös tämän summan, mistä viimeksi mainittu kieltäytyi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "BCP Bank" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "3.8.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellä 03/08/2016";
    "3.8.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellä 03/08/2016"-> "BCP Bank";
    "3.8.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellä 03/08/2016"-> "Se vaati 3.8.2016 päivätyllä kirjeellä BCP-pankkia palauttamaan sille myös tämän summan"[dir=none];
    "BCP Bank"->"MSC" [label="viimeksi mainittu kieltäytyi."];
    "MSC"->"Vuoden 2010 toukokuun ja vuoden 2013 syyskuun välillä sen tililtä oli saman riidanalaisen hyväksynnän perusteella tehty suoraveloituksia, joiden kokonaismäärä oli 8226,03 euroa 09/2013" [dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

MSC konstaterade därefter att autogireringar hade genomförts från dess konto på grundval av samma omtvistade auktorisering mellan maj månad 2010 och september månad 2013. Totalbeloppet av dessa autogireringar uppgick till 8226,03 euro (nedan kallade de omtvistade autogireringarna). Genom skrivelse av den 3 augusti 2016 begärde MSC att BCP-banken även skulle återbetala det beloppet, vilket banken vägrade.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "BCP Bank" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "skrivelse 03/08/2016";
    "skrivelse 03/08/2016"-> "BCP Bank";
    "skrivelse 03/08/2016"-> "Genom skrivelse av den 3 augusti 2016 begärde MSC att BCP-banken även skulle återbetala det beloppet"[dir=none];
    "BCP Bank"->"MSC" [label="vilket banken vägrade."];
    "MSC"->"Autogireringar hade genomförts från dess konto på grundval av samma omtvistade auktorisering mellan maj månad 2010 och september månad 2013. Totalbeloppet av dessa autogireringar uppgick till 8226,03 euro 09/2013" [dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: English

MSC then brought an action before the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (District Court, Oporto, Portugal) for an order that BCP Bank repay to MSC the sum corresponding to those direct debits. Since that action — in which BCP Bank summonsed the principal’s bank so as to ensure the possibility of bringing an action for redress — was dismissed as unfounded, MSC brought an appeal before the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Court of Appeal, Oporto), the referring court.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (District Court, Oporto, Portugal)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Court of Appeal, Oporto)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "Brought an action";
    "Brought an action"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (District Court, Oporto, Portugal)";
    "Brought an action"-> "For an order that BCP Bank repay to MSC the sum corresponding to those direct debits."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (District Court, Oporto, Portugal)"->"MSC" [label="Dismissed as unfounded"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Court of Appeal, Oporto)" [label="Brought an action"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

MSC сезира Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Районен съд Порто, Португалия) с искане за осъждането на банка BCP да върне сумата, съответстваща на тези директни дебити. Тъй като посоченият иск — в хода на който банката BCP привлича банката на наредителя, за да гарантира възможността си да предяви регресен иск — отхвърлен като неоснователен, MSC подава въззивна жалба пред Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Апелативен съд Порто), запитващата юрисдикция.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Районен съд Порто, Португалия)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Апелативен съд Порто)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "сезира";
    "сезира"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Районен съд Порто, Португалия)";
    "сезира"-> "с искане за осъждането на банка BCP да върне сумата, съответстваща на тези директни дебити."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Районен съд Порто, Португалия)"->"MSC" [label="отхвърлен като неоснователен"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Апелативен съд Порто)" [label="сезира"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

MSC presentó demanda ante el Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunal de Primera Instancia de Oporto, Portugal) con el objeto de que se condenara al banco BCP a devolverle el importe correspondiente a los adeudos controvertidos. Al haberse desestimado la demanda —en cuyo marco el banco BCP solicitó que se llamara al proceso al banco del ordenante para garantizar la posibilidad de ejercitar una acción de repetición—, MSC interpuso recurso de apelación ante el Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Audiencia de Oporto), que es el órgano jurisdiccional remitente.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunal de Primera Instancia de Oporto, Portugal)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Audiencia de Oporto))" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "presentó demanda";
    "presentó demanda"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunal de Primera Instancia de Oporto, Portugal)";
    "presentó demanda"-> "para que se condenara al banco BCP a devolverle el importe correspondiente a los adeudos controvertidos."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunal de Primera Instancia de Oporto, Portugal)"->"MSC" [label="Al haberse desestimado la demanda"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Audiencia de Oporto))" [label="presentó demanda"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Společnost MSC tedy podala žalobu k Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Okresní soud v Portu, Portugalsko), v níž požadovala, aby byla bance BCP uložena povinnost vrátit jí částku odpovídající těmto odepsaným částkám inkasa. Vzhledem k tomu, že tato žaloba – v souvislosti s níž banka BCP podala žalobu proti bance příkazce, aby si tak zajistila možnost uplatnit regresní nárok – byla zamítnuta jako neopodstatněná, společnost MSC podala odvolání k Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Odvolací soud v Portu), který je předkládajícím soudem.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Okresní soud v Portu, Portugalsko)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Odvolací soud v Portu)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "podala žalobu";
    "podala žalobu"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Okresní soud v Portu, Portugalsko)";
    "podala žalobu"-> "aby byla bance BCP uložena povinnost vrátit jí částku odpovídající těmto odepsaným částkám inkasa."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Okresní soud v Portu, Portugalsko)"->"MSC" [label="zamítnuta jako neopodstatněná"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Odvolací soud v Portu)" [label="podala žalobu"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

MSC anlagde dernæst sag ved Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (ret i første instans i Porto, Portugal) med påstand om, at BCP-banken skulle tilpligtes at tilbagebetale et beløb svarende til disse debiteringer til MSC. MSC fik ikke medhold i dette søgsmål, under hvilket BCP-banken adciterede ordregiverens bank for at sikre sig muligheden for at kunne anlægge et regressøgsmål, og MSC iværksatte derfor appel til Tribunal da Relação do Porto (appeldomstolen i Porto), dvs. den forelæggende ret.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Tribunal da Relação do Porto)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "anlagde dernæst sag";
    "anlagde dernæst sag"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto)";
    "anlagde dernæst sag"-> "Med påstand om, at BCP-banken skulle tilpligtes at tilbagebetale et beløb svarende til disse debiteringer til MSC."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto)"->"MSC" [label="MSC fik ikke medhold i dette søgsmål"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Tribunal da Relação do Porto)" [label="anlagde dernæst sag"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: German

MSC erhob dann beim Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Bezirksgericht Porto, Portugal) Klage auf Ersatz des diesen Lastschriften entsprechenden Betrags durch die Bank BCP. Nachdem diese Klage – in deren Rahmen die Bank BCP der Bank des Auftraggebers den Streit verkündete, damit ihr die Möglichkeit einer Regressklage garantiert bliebe – als unbegründet abgewiesen worden war, legte MSC Berufung zum Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Berufungsgericht Porto), dem vorlegenden Gericht, ein.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Bezirksgericht Porto, Portugal)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Berufungsgericht Porto)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "erhob dann beim Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Bezirksgericht Porto, Portugal) Klage";
    "erhob dann beim Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Bezirksgericht Porto, Portugal) Klage"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Bezirksgericht Porto, Portugal)";
    "erhob dann beim Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Bezirksgericht Porto, Portugal) Klage"-> "Klage auf Ersatz des diesen Lastschriften entsprechenden Betrags durch die Bank BCP."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Bezirksgericht Porto, Portugal)"->"MSC" [label="als unbegründet abgewiesen"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Berufungsgericht Porto)" [label="erhob dann beim Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Bezirksgericht Porto, Portugal) Klage"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

MSC esitas seejärel hagi Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Portole (Porto piirkondlik kohus, Portugal) nõudes, et BCP pangalt mõistetaks tema kasuks välja nendele otsearveldustele vastav summa. Kuna see hagi – mille raames BCP pank esitas hagi maksekäsundi andja panga vastu, et kindlustada endale võimalus tagasinõude esitamiseks – jäeti põhjendamatuse tõttu rahuldamata, esitas MSC apellatsioonkaebuse Tribunal da Relação do Portole (Porto apellatsioonikohus) – eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohtule.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto piirkondlik kohus, Portugal)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Porto apellatsioonikohus)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "Esitas seejärel hagi";
    "Esitas seejärel hagi"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto piirkondlik kohus, Portugal)";
    "Esitas seejärel hagi"-> "nõudes, et BCP pangalt mõistetaks tema kasuks välja nendele otsearveldustele vastav summa."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto piirkondlik kohus, Portugal)"->"MSC" [label="Jäeti põhjendamatuse tõttu rahuldamata"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Porto apellatsioonikohus)" [label="Esitas seejärel hagi"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Η MSC άσκησε τότε αγωγή ενώπιον του Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (πρωτοδικείου Πόρτο, Πορτογαλία) με αίτημα να υποχρεωθεί η τράπεζα BCP να της επιστρέψει το ποσό που αντιστοιχούσε στις ανωτέρω άμεσες χρεώσεις. Η αγωγή αυτή –στο πλαίσιο της οποίας η τράπεζα BCP προσεπικάλεσε την τράπεζα του εντολέα για να εξασφαλίσει τη δυνατότητα να ασκήσει αγωγή εξ αναγωγής– απορρίφθηκε ως αβάσιμη, οπότε η MSC άσκησε έφεση ενώπιον του Tribunal da Relação do Porto (εφετείου Πόρτο), ήτοι του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (πρωτοδικείου Πόρτο, Πορτογαλία)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (εφετείου Πόρτο)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "άσκησε τότε αγωγή";
    "άσκησε τότε αγωγή"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (πρωτοδικείου Πόρτο, Πορτογαλία)";
    "άσκησε τότε αγωγή"-> "με αίτημα να υποχρεωθεί η τράπεζα BCP να της επιστρέψει το ποσό που αντιστοιχούσε στις ανωτέρω άμεσες χρεώσεις."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (πρωτοδικείου Πόρτο, Πορτογαλία)"->"MSC" [label="απορρίφθηκε ως αβάσιμη"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (εφετείου Πόρτο)" [label="άσκησε τότε αγωγή"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: French

MSC a alors saisi le Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (tribunal d’arrondissement de Porto, Portugal) d’un recours tendant à ce que la banque BCP soit condamnée à lui restituer le montant correspondant à ces prélèvements. Ce recours – dans le cadre duquel la banque BCP a fait citer la banque du donneur d’ordre pour se garantir la possibilité d’intenter une action récursoire – ayant été rejeté comme étant non fondé, MSC a interjeté appel devant le Tribunal da Relação do Porto (cour d’appel de Porto), la juridiction de renvoi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Cour d'appel de Porto)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "a saisi le Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto d’un recours";
    "a saisi le Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto d’un recours"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto)";
    "a saisi le Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto d’un recours"-> "Recours tendant à ce que la banque BCP soit condamnée à lui restituer le montant correspondant à ces prélèvements."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto)"->"MSC" [label="Rejeté comme étant non fondé"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Cour d'appel de Porto)" [label="a saisi le Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto d’un recours"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Društvo MSC potom je podnijelo tužbu pred Tribunalom Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Sud sudskog okruga Porto, Portugal) zahtijevajući da se banci BCP naloži povrat iznosa koji odgovaraju tim izravnim terećenjima. Ta tužba – u okviru koje je banka BCP pozvala u parnicu banku davatelja naloga kako bi si osigurala mogućnost podnošenja regresnog zahtjeva – odbijena je kao neosnovana te je društvo MSC podnijelo žalbu pred Tribunalom da Relação do Porto (Žalbeni sud u Portu), sudom koji je uputio zahtjev.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Sud sudskog okruga Porto, Portugal)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Žalbeni sud u Portu)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "podnijelo tužbu";
    "podnijelo tužbu"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Sud sudskog okruga Porto, Portugal)";
    "podnijelo tužbu"-> "Zahtijevajući da se banci BCP naloži povrat iznosa koji odgovaraju tim izravnim terećenjima."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Sud sudskog okruga Porto, Portugal)"->"MSC" [label="Odbijena je kao neosnovana"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Žalbeni sud u Portu)" [label="podnijelo tužbu"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

La MSC proponeva quindi ricorso dinanzi al Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunale circondariale di Porto, Portogallo) chiedendo che la banca BCP fosse condannata a restituirle l’importo corrispondente a detti ordini di addebito. Dato che questo ricorso – nel contesto del quale la banca BCP faceva citare la banca dell’ordinante per assicurarsi la possibilità di intentare un’azione di regresso – veniva respinto in quanto infondato, la MSC interponeva appello dinanzi al Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Corte d’appello di Porto), giudice del rinvio.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunale circondariale di Porto, Portogallo)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Corte d’appello di Porto)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "proponeva quindi ricorso";
    "proponeva quindi ricorso"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunale circondariale di Porto, Portogallo)";
    "proponeva quindi ricorso"-> "chiedendo che la banca BCP fosse condannata a restituirle l’importo corrispondente a detti ordini di addebito."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Tribunale circondariale di Porto, Portogallo)"->"MSC" [label="Respinso in quanto infondato"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Corte d’appello di Porto)" [label="proponeva quindi ricorso"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Tad MSC vērsās Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto pirmās instances tiesa, Portugāle), lūdzot, lai bankai BCP tiktu piespriests tai atmaksāt summu, kas atbilst šiem tiešā debeta maksājumiem. Tā kā šī prasība – kuras ietvaros banka BCP, lai nodrošinātu sev iespēju celt regresa prasību, lūdza pieaicināt maksājuma uzdevuma devēja banku – tika noraidīta kā nepamatota, MSC iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību iesniedzējtiesā – Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Porto apelācijas tiesa).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto pirmās instances tiesa, Portugāle)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Porto apelācijas tiesa)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "vērsās Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto pirmās instances tiesa, Portugāle), lūdzot, lai bankai BCP tiktu piespriests tai atmaksāt summu, kas atbilst šiem tiešā debeta maksājumiem.";
    "vērsās Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto pirmās instances tiesa, Portugāle), lūdzot, lai bankai BCP tiktu piespriests tai atmaksāt summu, kas atbilst šiem tiešā debeta maksājumiem."-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto pirmās instances tiesa, Portugāle)";
    "vērsās Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto pirmās instances tiesa, Portugāle), lūdzot, lai bankai BCP tiktu piespriests tai atmaksāt summu, kas atbilst šiem tiešā debeta maksājumiem."-> "lūdzot, lai bankai BCP tiktu piespriests tai atmaksāt summu, kas atbilst šiem tiešā debeta maksājumiem."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto pirmās instances tiesa, Portugāle)"->"MSC" [label="Tika noraidīta kā nepamatota"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Porto apelācijas tiesa)" [label="vērsās Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto pirmās instances tiesa, Portugāle), lūdzot, lai bankai BCP tiktu piespriests tai atmaksāt summu, kas atbilst šiem tiešā debeta maksājumiem."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Taigi MSC pateikė Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto apylinkės teismas, Portugalija) ieškinį, jame prašė nurodyti BCP bankui grąžinti jai sumą, prarastą atliekant minėtus tiesioginio debeto pervedimus. Šis ieškinys, kurį nagrinėjant BCP bankas, siekdamas užsitikrinti teisę pareikšti regresinį ieškinį, paprašė į bylą įtraukti mokėjimo užsakovo banką, buvo atmestas kaip nepagrįstas, todėl MSC pateikė apeliacinį skundą Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Porto apeliacinis teismas, Portugalija), prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikusiam teismui.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto apylinkės teismas, Portugalija)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Porto apeliacinis teismas)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "pateikė ieškinį";
    "pateikė ieškinį"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto apylinkės teismas, Portugalija)";
    "pateikė ieškinį"-> "nurodyti BCP bankui grąžinti jai sumą, prarastą atliekant minėtus tiesioginio debeto pervedimus."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Porto apylinkės teismas, Portugalija)"->"MSC" [label="Atmestas kaip nepagrįstas"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Porto apeliacinis teismas)" [label="pateikė ieškinį"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.
Case C-295/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Az MSC ekkor keresetet indított a Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (portói kerületi bíróság, Portugália) előtt annak érdekében, hogy a BCP‑bankot kötelezzék arra, hogy térítse vissza neki az e beszedéseknek megfelelő összeget. Mivel e keresetet – amelynek keretében a BCP‑bank perbe hívta a megbízó bankját annak érdekében, hogy biztosítsa magának a lehetőséget megtérítési igény érvényesítésére – megalapozatlanként elutasították, az MSC fellebbezéssel élt a Tribunal da Relação do Porto (portói fellebbviteli bíróság), vagyis a kérdést előterjesztő bíróság előtt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (portói kerületi bíróság, Portugália)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "MSC" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Tribunal da Relação do Porto)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "MSC" -> "keresetet indított";
    "keresetet indított"-> "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (portói kerületi bíróság, Portugália)";
    "keresetet indított"-> "Hogy a BCP‑bankot kötelezzék arra, hogy térítse vissza neki az e beszedéseknek megfelelő összeget."[dir=none];
    "Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (portói kerületi bíróság, Portugália)"->"MSC" [label="megalapozatlanként elutasították"];
    "MSC"->"Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Tribunal da Relação do Porto)" [label="keresetet indított"];
    
}