mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/39 (2019)
Language: Finnish

Puolisot Dreyer ovat Ranskan kansalaisia, jotka asuvat Ranskassa ja joiden verotuksellinen kotipaikka on siellä. Nykyisin eläkkeellä oleva Raymond Dreyer teki koko työuransa Sveitsissä ja sekä hän että hänen puolisonsa kuuluvat Sveitsin sosiaaliturvajärjestelmään.
Ranskan verohallinto antoi 31.10.2016 maksuunpanopäätöksen, joka vahvistettiin 6.12.2016 tehdyllä päätöksellä, ja jonka mukaan puolisoiden Dreyer oli maksettava Ranskassa vuonna 2015 pääomatulojen muodossa saamiensa omaisuustulojen perusteella yleinen sosiaalimaksu, sosiaaliturvavelan lyhentämiseksi kannettava maksu, sosiaalimaksu ja sosiaalimaksun lisämaksu sekä solidaarisuusmaksu (jäljempänä yhdessä kyseiset maksut). Viimeksi mainituilla rahoitetaan kolmea Ranskan elintä, joita ovat vanhusten avustusrahasto (fonds de solidarité vieillesse; jäljempänä FSV), sosiaaliturvavelan lyhentämisestä huolehtiva elin (caisse d’amortissement de la dette sociale; jäljempänä CADES) ja itsenäistä selviytymistä tukeva kansallinen yhteisvastuuelin (caisse nationale de solidarité pour l’autonomie; jäljempänä CNSA).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Dreyer Dreyer"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Ranskan verohallinto"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Ranskan verohallinto"->"maksuunpanopäätöksen 31/10/2016";
  "maksuunpanopäätöksen 31/10/2016"->"Dreyer Dreyer";
  "asuvat Ranskassa ja joiden verotuksellinen kotipaikka on siellä.."->"Dreyer Dreyer"[dir=none];
  "kuuluvat Sveitsin sosiaaliturvajärjestelmään."->"Dreyer Dreyer"[dir=none];
  "31.10.2016 maksuunpanopäätöksen, joka vahvistettiin 6.12.2016 tehdyllä päätöksellä 06/12/2016"->"maksuunpanopäätöksen 31/10/2016"[dir=none];
  "Puolisoiden Dreyer oli maksettava Ranskassa vuonna 2015 pääomatulojen muodossa saamiensa omaisuustulojen perusteella yleinen sosiaalimaksu, sosiaaliturvavelan lyhentämiseksi kannettava maksu, sosiaalimaksu ja sosiaalimaksun lisämaksu sekä solidaarisuusmaksu.."->"Ranskan verohallinto"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/40 (2019)
Language: Swedish

Makarna Dreyer är franska medborgare och är bosatta och har skatterättslig hemvist i Frankrike. Raymond Dreyer, som i dag är pensionerad, arbetade under hela sitt yrkesliv i Schweiz och han och hans maka omfattas av systemet för social trygghet i Schweiz.
Genom omprövningsbeslut av den 31 oktober 2016, vilket fastställdes genom beslut av den 6 december 2016, beslutade den franska skattemyndigheten att makarna Dreyer för kapitalinkomster de haft i Frankrike under år 2015 i form av inkomst av värdepapper skulle betala en allmän social avgift, en amorteringsavgift för sociala avgifter, en social avgift, en tilläggsavgift och ett solidaritetstillägg (nedan kallade de aktuella pålagorna). Dessa pålagor bidrar till att finansiera tre franska organ, nämligen Fonds de solidarité vieillesse (solidaritetsfonden för ålderdom) (nedan kallad FSV), Caisse d’amortissement de la dette sociale (kassan för sociala avgifter) (nedan kallad CADES) och Caisse nationale de solidarité pour l’autonomie (nationella solidaritetskassan för självständighet) (nedan kallad CNSA).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Makarna Dreyer"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "den franska skattemyndigheten"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "den franska skattemyndigheten"->"omprövningsbeslut 31/10/2016";
  "omprövningsbeslut 31/10/2016"->"Makarna Dreyer";
  "är bosatta och har skatterättslig hemvist i Frankrike.."->"Makarna Dreyer"[dir=none];
  "omfattas av systemet för social trygghet i Schweiz."->"Makarna Dreyer"[dir=none];
  "beslut 06/12/2016"->"omprövningsbeslut 31/10/2016"[dir=none];
  "Makarna Dreyer för kapitalinkomster de haft i Frankrike under år 2015 i form av inkomst av värdepapper skulle betala en allmän social avgift, en amorteringsavgift för sociala avgifter, en social avgift, en tilläggsavgift och ett solidaritetstillägg.."->"den franska skattemyndigheten"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/19 (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

При тези условия Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Апелативен административен съд Нанси) решава да спре производството и да постави на Съда следния преюдициален въпрос:
„Имат ли удръжките, предназначени за [CNSA], които допринасят за финансирането на [ПОС и КОУ], пряка и достатъчно релевантна връзка с някои клонове на социалната сигурност, изброени в член 3 от Регламент [№ 883/2004], и вследствие на това попадат ли в приложното поле на този регламент поради самия факт, че тези обезщетения са свързани с някой от рисковете, изброени в посочения член 3, и се предоставят без каквато и да било възможност за дискреционна преценка въз основа на законово определено положение?“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Апелативен административен съд Нанси)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Апелативен административен съд Нанси"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Апелативен административен съд Нанси)"->"преюдициален въпрос";
  "преюдициален въпрос"->"Апелативен административен съд Нанси";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Апелативен административен съд Нанси)"->"спре производството"[dir=none];
  "преюдициален въпрос"->"Имат ли удръжките, предназначени за [CNSA], които допринасят за финансирането на [ПОС и КОУ], пряка и достатъчно релевантна връзка с някои клонове на социалната сигурност, изброени в член 3 от Регламент [№ 883/2004], и вследствие на това попадат ли в приложното поле на този регламент поради самия факт, че тези обезщетения са свързани с някой от рисковете, изброени в посочения член 3, и се предоставят без каквато и да било възможност за дискреционна преценка въз основа на законово определено положение?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/22 (2019)
Language: Danish

Under disse omstændigheder har cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (appeldomstolen i forvaltningsretlige sager i Nancy) besluttet at udsætte sagen og forelægge Domstolen følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål:
»Har de bidrag, der skal henføres til [CNSA] til finansieringen af [APA og PCH] en direkte og tilstrækkelig relevant sammenhæng med visse af de sociale sikringsgrene, der er opregnet i artikel 3 i forordning [nr. 883/2004], og er de derfor omfattet af denne forordnings anvendelsesområde, alene fordi disse ydelser vedrører en af de risici, der er nævnt i artikel 3, og skal tildeles uden skønsmæssig bedømmelse på grundlag af en ved lov fastlagt situation?«

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (cour administrative d’appel de Nancy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Domstolen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (cour administrative d’appel de Nancy)"->"præjudicielle spørgsmål";
  "præjudicielle spørgsmål"->"Domstolen";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (cour administrative d’appel de Nancy)"->"udsætte sagen"[dir=none];
  "præjudicielle spørgsmål"->"Har de bidrag, der skal henføres til [CNSA] til finansieringen af [APA og PCH] en direkte og tilstrækkelig relevant sammenhæng med visse af de sociale sikringsgrene, der er opregnet i artikel 3 i forordning [nr. 883/2004], og er de derfor omfattet af denne forordnings anvendelsesområde, alene fordi disse ydelser vedrører en af de risici, der er nævnt i artikel 3, og skal tildeles uden skønsmæssig bedømmelse på grundlag af en ved lov fastlagt situation?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/23 (2019)
Language: German

Unter diesen Umständen hat die Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Verwaltungsberufungsgericht Nancy) beschlossen, das Verfahren auszusetzen und dem Gerichtshof folgende Frage zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen:
Weisen die in der CNSA verwendeten Abgaben, die zur Finanzierung der APA und der PCH beitragen, eine unmittelbare und hinreichend relevante Verbindung zu bestimmten in Art. 3 der Verordnung Nr. 883/2004 aufgezählten Zweigen der sozialen Sicherheit auf, und fallen sie folglich allein deswegen in den Geltungsbereich dieser Verordnung, weil sich diese Leistungen auf eines der in diesem Art. 3 aufgezählten Risiken beziehen und ohne jede im Ermessen liegende Prüfung aufgrund eines gesetzlich umschriebenen Tatbestands gewährt werden?

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Verwaltungsberufungsgericht Nancy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "der Gerichtshof"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Verwaltungsberufungsgericht Nancy)"->"folgende Frage zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen";
  "folgende Frage zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen"->"der Gerichtshof";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Verwaltungsberufungsgericht Nancy)"->"das Verfahren auszusetzen"[dir=none];
  "folgende Frage zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen"->"Weisen die in der CNSA verwendeten Abgaben, die zur Finanzierung der APA und der PCH beitragen, eine unmittelbare und hinreichend relevante Verbindung zu bestimmten in Art. 3 der Verordnung Nr. 883/2004 aufgezählten Zweigen der sozialen Sicherheit auf, und fallen sie folglich allein deswegen in den Geltungsbereich dieser Verordnung, weil sich diese Leistungen auf eines der in diesem Art. 3 aufgezählten Risiken beziehen und ohne jede im Ermessen liegende Prüfung aufgrund eines gesetzlich umschriebenen Tatbestands gewährt werden?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/25 (2019)
Language: Greek

Υπό τις συνθήκες αυτές, το cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (διοικητικό εφετείο Νανσύ) αποφάσισε να αναστείλει την ενώπιόν του διαδικασία και να υποβάλει στο Δικαστήριο το ακόλουθο προδικαστικό ερώτημα:
«Ερωτάται αν οι επιβαρύνσεις υπέρ του [CNSA], οι οποίες συμβάλλουν στη χρηματοδότηση [του APA και της PCH], συνδέονται άμεσα και αρκούντως με ορισμένους από τους κλάδους κοινωνικής ασφάλισης που απαριθμούνται στο άρθρο 3 του κανονισμού [883/2004] και, επομένως, εμπίπτουν στο πεδίο εφαρμογής του κανονισμού αυτού, απλώς και μόνο διότι οι παροχές αυτές συνδέονται με κάποιον από τους απαριθμούμενους στο εν λόγω άρθρο 3 κινδύνους και χορηγούνται χωρίς καμία διακριτική ευχέρεια, βάσει καταστάσεως καθοριζομένης από τον νόμο.»

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (διοικητικό εφετείο Νανσύ)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Δικαστήριο"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (διοικητικό εφετείο Νανσύ)"->"προδικαστικό ερώτημα";
  "προδικαστικό ερώτημα"->"Δικαστήριο";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (διοικητικό εφετείο Νανσύ)"->"να αναστείλει την ενώπιόν του διαδικασία"[dir=none];
  "προδικαστικό ερώτημα"->"Ερωτάται αν οι επιβαρύνσεις υπέρ του [CNSA], οι οποίες συμβάλλουν στη χρηματοδότηση [του APA και της PCH], συνδέονται άμεσα και αρκούντως με ορισμένους από τους κλάδους κοινωνικής ασφάλισης που απαριθμούνται στο άρθρο 3 του κανονισμού [883/2004] και, επομένως, εμπίπτουν στο πεδίο εφαρμογής του κανονισμού αυτού, απλώς και μόνο διότι οι παροχές αυτές συνδέονται με κάποιον από τους απαριθμούμενους στο εν λόγω άρθρο 3 κινδύνους και χορηγούνται χωρίς καμία διακριτική ευχέρεια, βάσει καταστάσεως καθοριζομένης από τον νόμο."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/26 (2019)
Language: French

Dans ces conditions, la cour administrative d’appel de Nancy a décidé de surseoir à statuer et de poser à la Cour la question préjudicielle suivante :
« Les prélèvements affectés à la [CNSA], qui contribuent au financement [de l’APA et de la PCH], présentent-ils un lien direct et suffisamment pertinent avec certaines branches de la sécurité sociale énumérées à l’article 3 du règlement [no 883/2004] et entrent-ils par suite dans le champ d’application de ce règlement du seul fait que ces prestations se rapportent à l’un des risques énumérés audit article 3 et sont octroyées en dehors de toute appréciation discrétionnaire sur la base d’une situation légalement définie ? »

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (la cour administrative d’appel de Nancy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la Cour"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (la cour administrative d’appel de Nancy)"->"la question préjudicielle suivante";
  "la question préjudicielle suivante"->"la Cour";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (la cour administrative d’appel de Nancy)"->"surseoir à statuer"[dir=none];
  "la question préjudicielle suivante"->"Les prélèvements affectés à la [CNSA], qui contribuent au financement [de l’APA et de la PCH], présentent-ils un lien direct et suffisamment pertinent avec certaines branches de la sécurité sociale énumérées à l’article 3 du règlement [no 883/2004] et entrent-ils par suite dans le champ d’application de ce règlement du seul fait que ces prestations se rapportent à l’un des risques énumérés audit article 3 et sont octroyées en dehors de toute appréciation discrétionnaire sur la base d’une situation légalement définie ?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/28 (2019)
Language: Italian

In tale contesto, la cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Corte d’appello amministrativa di Nancy) ha deciso di sospendere il procedimento e di sottoporre alla Corte la seguente questione pregiudiziale:
«Se le somme versate alla [CNSA], che contribuiscono al finanziamento [dell’APA e della PCH], presentino un nesso diretto e sufficientemente rilevante con determinati settori della sicurezza sociale, elencati all’articolo 3 del regolamento [n. 883/2004], e rientrino di conseguenza nell’ambito di applicazione di tale regolamento per il solo fatto che tali prestazioni facciano riferimento a uno dei rischi elencati in detto articolo 3 e siano concesse al di fuori di ogni valutazione discrezionale, sulla base di una situazione legalmente definita».

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Corte d’appello amministrativa di Nancy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Corte d’appello amministrativa di Nancy"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Corte d’appello amministrativa di Nancy)"->"La seguente questione pregiudiziale";
  "La seguente questione pregiudiziale"->"Corte d’appello amministrativa di Nancy";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Corte d’appello amministrativa di Nancy)"->"sospendere il procedimento"[dir=none];
  "La seguente questione pregiudiziale"->"Se le somme versate alla [CNSA], che contribuiscono al finanziamento [dell’APA e della PCH], presentino un nesso diretto e sufficientemente rilevante con determinati settori della sicurezza sociale, elencati all’articolo 3 del regolamento [n. 883/2004], e rientrino di conseguenza nell’ambito di applicazione di tale regolamento per il solo fatto che tali prestazioni facciano riferimento a uno dei rischi elencati in detto articolo 3 e siano concesse al di fuori di ogni valutazione discrezionale, sulla base di una situazione legalmente definita"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/29 (2019)
Language: Latvian

Šādos apstākļos cour administrative d’appel de Nancy nolēma apturēt tiesvedību un uzdot Tiesai šādu prejudiciālu jautājumu:
“Vai iemaksas [CNSA], no kurām tiek daļēji finansēti [APA un PCH], ir uzskatāmas par tādām, kurām ir tieša un pietiekami atbilstoša saikne ar kādu no Regulas [Nr. 883/2004] 3. pantā uzskaitītajām sociālā nodrošinājuma jomām, un vai tās ietilpst šīs regulas tvērumā tādēļ vien, ka šie pabalsti atbilst kādam no minētajā 3. pantā uzskaitītajiem riskiem un tiek piešķirti likumā noteiktā gadījumā bez jebkāda diskrecionāra izvērtējuma?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (cour administrative d’appel de Nancy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tiesai"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (cour administrative d’appel de Nancy)"->"un uzdot Tiesai šādu prejudiciālu jautājumu";
  "un uzdot Tiesai šādu prejudiciālu jautājumu"->"Tiesai";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (cour administrative d’appel de Nancy)"->"apturēt tiesvedību"[dir=none];
  "un uzdot Tiesai šādu prejudiciālu jautājumu"->"Vai iemaksas [CNSA], no kurām tiek daļēji finansēti [APA un PCH], ir uzskatāmas par tādām, kurām ir tieša un pietiekami atbilstoša saikne ar kādu no Regulas [Nr. 883/2004] 3. pantā uzskaitītajām sociālā nodrošinājuma jomām, un vai tās ietilpst šīs regulas tvērumā tādēļ vien, ka šie pabalsti atbilst kādam no minētajā 3. pantā uzskaitītajiem riskiem un tiek piešķirti likumā noteiktā gadījumā bez jebkāda diskrecionāra izvērtējuma?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/30 (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Šiomis aplinkybėmis Cour administrative d’appel de Nantes (Nansi administracinis apeliacinis teismas, Prancūzija) nusprendė sustabdyti bylos nagrinėjimą ir pateikti Teisingumo Teismui šį prejudicinį klausimą:
„Ar įmokos į [CNSA], kuriomis iš dalies finansuojamos [APA ir PCH], turi tiesioginį ir pakankamai svarbų ryšį su tam tikromis socialinio draudimo sritimis, išvardytomis [Reglamento Nr. 883/2004] 3 straipsnyje, todėl joms taikomas šis reglamentas vien dėl to, kad šios išmokos susijusios su viena iš minėtame 3 straipsnyje išvardytų sričių ir skiriamos neatsižvelgiant į diskrecinį asmeninių poreikių vertinimą remiantis teisės aktuose apibrėžta situacija?“

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Nansi administracinis apeliacinis teismas, Prancūzija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Teisingumo Teismui"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Nansi administracinis apeliacinis teismas, Prancūzija)"->"Teisingumo Teismui šį prejudicinį klausimą";
  "Teisingumo Teismui šį prejudicinį klausimą"->"Teisingumo Teismui";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Nansi administracinis apeliacinis teismas, Prancūzija)"->"sustabdyti bylos nagrinėjimą"[dir=none];
  "Teisingumo Teismui šį prejudicinį klausimą"->"Ar įmokos į [CNSA], kuriomis iš dalies finansuojamos [APA ir PCH], turi tiesioginį ir pakankamai svarbų ryšį su tam tikromis socialinio draudimo sritimis, išvardytomis [Reglamento Nr. 883/2004] 3 straipsnyje, todėl joms taikomas šis reglamentas vien dėl to, kad šios išmokos susijusios su viena iš minėtame 3 straipsnyje išvardytų sričių ir skiriamos neatsižvelgiant į diskrecinį asmeninių poreikių vertinimą remiantis teisės aktuose apibrėžta situacija?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/32 (2019)
Language: Maltese

F’dawn iċ-ċirkustanzi, il-cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (il-Qorti Amministrattiva tal-Appell ta’ Nancy) iddeċidiet li tissospendi l-proċeduri u li tagħmel lill-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja d-domanda preliminari li ġejja:
“Il-kontribuzzjonijiet allokati lill-[CNSA], li jikkontribwixxu għall-finanzjament [tal-APA u tal-PCH], għandhom rabta diretta u suffiċjentement rilevanti ma’ ċerti fergħat tas-sigurtà soċjali elenkati fl-Artikolu 3 tar-Regolament [Nru 883/2004] u għalhekk jaqgħu fil-kamp ta’ applikazzjoni ta’ dan ir-regolament sempliċement minħabba li dawn is-servizzi jirrelataw ma’ wieħed mir-riskji elenkati fl-imsemmi Artikolu 3 u jingħataw mingħajr ebda evalwazzjoni diskrezzjonali abbażi ta’ sitwazzjoni ddefinita legalment?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Qorti Amministrattiva tal-Appell ta’ Nancy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Qorti tal-Ġustizzja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Qorti Amministrattiva tal-Appell ta’ Nancy)"->"Il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja d-domanda preliminari";
  "Il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja d-domanda preliminari"->"Qorti tal-Ġustizzja";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Qorti Amministrattiva tal-Appell ta’ Nancy)"->"tissospendi l-proċeduri"[dir=none];
  "Il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja d-domanda preliminari"->"Il-kontribuzzjonijiet allokati lill-[CNSA], li jikkontribwixxu għall-finanzjament [tal-APA u tal-PCH], għandhom rabta diretta u suffiċjentement rilevanti ma’ ċerti fergħat tas-sigurtà soċjali elenkati fl-Artikolu 3 tar-Regolament [Nru 883/2004] u għalhekk jaqgħu fil-kamp ta’ applikazzjoni ta’ dan ir-regolament sempliċement minħabba li dawn is-servizzi jirrelataw ma’ wieħed mir-riskji elenkati fl-imsemmi Artikolu 3 u jingħataw mingħajr ebda evalwazzjoni diskrezzjonali abbażi ta’ sitwazzjoni ddefinita legalment?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/33 (2019)
Language: Dutch

Daarop heeft de Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy de behandeling van de zaak geschorst en het Hof de volgende prejudiciële vraag gesteld:
„Vertonen heffingen die zijn bestemd voor de [CNSA], waarmee wordt bijgedragen aan de financiering [van de APA en de PCH], een rechtstreekse en voldoende relevante samenhang met bepaalde takken van sociale zekerheid zoals genoemd in artikel 3 van verordening [nr. 883/2004] en vallen deze bijgevolg binnen de werkingssfeer van deze verordening, louter vanwege het feit dat deze uitkeringen betrekking hebben op een van de in artikel 3 vermelde eventualiteiten en worden toegekend zonder een discretionaire beoordeling op grond van een wettelijk omschreven situatie?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy)"->"de volgende prejudiciële vraag gesteld";
  "de volgende prejudiciële vraag gesteld"->"Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy)"->"de behandeling van de zaak geschorst"[dir=none];
  "de volgende prejudiciële vraag gesteld"->"Vertonen heffingen die zijn bestemd voor de [CNSA], waarmee wordt bijgedragen aan de financiering [van de APA en de PCH], een rechtstreekse en voldoende relevante samenhang met bepaalde takken van sociale zekerheid zoals genoemd in artikel 3 van verordening [nr. 883/2004] en vallen deze bijgevolg binnen de werkingssfeer van deze verordening, louter vanwege het feit dat deze uitkeringen betrekking hebben op een van de in artikel 3 vermelde eventualiteiten en worden toegekend zonder een discretionaire beoordeling op grond van een wettelijk omschreven situatie?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/34 (2019)
Language: Polish

W tych okolicznościach cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (apelacyjny sąd administracyjny w Nancy) postanowił zawiesić postępowanie i zwrócić się do Trybunału z następującym pytaniem prejudycjalnym:
„Czy składki przeznaczone na [CNSA], które przyczyniają się do finansowania [APA i PCH], mają bezpośredni i wystarczająco istotny związek z niektórymi działami zabezpieczenia społecznego wymienionymi w art. 3 rozporządzenia [nr 883/2004], a wobec tego wchodzą w zakres stosowania tego rozporządzenia z tego tylko względu, że odnoszą się do jednego z rodzajów ryzyka wymienionych w art. 3 i są przyznawane bez jakiejkolwiek uznaniowości na podstawie prawnie określonej sytuacji?”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (apelacyjny sąd administracyjny w Nancy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Trybunału"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (apelacyjny sąd administracyjny w Nancy)"->"pytaniem prejudycjalnym";
  "pytaniem prejudycjalnym"->"Trybunału";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (apelacyjny sąd administracyjny w Nancy)"->"zawiesić postępowanie"[dir=none];
  "pytaniem prejudycjalnym"->"Czy składki przeznaczone na [CNSA], które przyczyniają się do finansowania [APA i PCH], mają bezpośredni i wystarczająco istotny związek z niektórymi działami zabezpieczenia społecznego wymienionymi w art. 3 rozporządzenia [nr 883/2004], a wobec tego wchodzą w zakres stosowania tego rozporządzenia z tego tylko względu, że odnoszą się do jednego z rodzajów ryzyka wymienionych w art. 3 i są przyznawane bez jakiejkolwiek uznaniowości na podstawie prawnie określonej sytuacji?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/35 (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Nestas condições, a cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Tribunal Administrativo de Recurso de Nancy) decidiu suspender a instância e submeter ao Tribunal de Justiça a seguinte questão prejudicial:
«As contribuições afetadas à [CNSA], que contribuem para o financiamento [do APA e da PCH], apresentam um nexo direto e suficientemente pertinente com certos ramos da segurança social enumerados no artigo 3.o do [Regulamento n.o 883/2004] e são, por conseguinte, abrangidas pelo âmbito de aplicação deste regulamento pelo simples facto de estas prestações estarem relacionadas com um dos riscos enumerados no referido artigo 3.o e serem concedidas sem qualquer apreciação discricionária e com base numa situação legalmente definida?»

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Tribunal Administrativo de Recurso de Nancy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tribunal de Justiça"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Tribunal Administrativo de Recurso de Nancy)"->"a seguinte questão prejudicial";
  "a seguinte questão prejudicial"->"Tribunal de Justiça";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Tribunal Administrativo de Recurso de Nancy)"->"suspender a instância"[dir=none];
  "a seguinte questão prejudicial"->"As contribuições afetadas à [CNSA], que contribuem para o financiamento [do APA e da PCH], apresentam um nexo direto e suficientemente pertinente com certos ramos da segurança social enumerados no artigo 3.o do [Regulamento n.o 883/2004] e são, por conseguinte, abrangidas pelo âmbito de aplicação deste regulamento pelo simples facto de estas prestações estarem relacionadas com um dos riscos enumerados no referido artigo 3.o e serem concedidas sem qualquer apreciação discricionária e com base numa situação legalmente definida?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/36 (2019)
Language: Romanian

În aceste condiții, cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Curtea Administrativă de Apel din Nancy) (Franța) a hotărât să suspende judecarea cauzei și să adreseze Curții următoarea întrebare preliminară:
„Prelevările alocate [CNSA], care contribuie la finanțarea [APA și a PCH], au o legătură directă și suficient de relevantă cu anumite ramuri de securitate socială enumerate la articolul 3 din Regulamentul [nr. 883/2004] și, în consecință, intră în domeniul de aplicare al acestui regulament pentru simplul motiv că prestațiile respective se raportează la unul dintre riscurile enumerate la articolul 3 menționat și sunt acordate pe baza unei situații definite legal, independent de orice apreciere discreționară?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Curtea Administrativă de Apel din Nancy (Franța))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Curții"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Curtea Administrativă de Apel din Nancy (Franța))"->"următoarea întrebare preliminară";
  "următoarea întrebare preliminară"->"Curții";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Curtea Administrativă de Apel din Nancy (Franța))"->"a hotărât să suspende judecarea cauzei"[dir=none];
  "următoarea întrebare preliminară"->"Prelevările alocate [CNSA], care contribuie la finanțarea [APA și a PCH], au o legătură directă și suficient de relevantă cu anumite ramuri de securitate socială enumerate la articolul 3 din Regulamentul [nr. 883/2004] și, în consecință, intră în domeniul de aplicare al acestui regulament pentru simplul motiv că prestațiile respective se raportează la unul dintre riscurile enumerate la articolul 3 menționat și sunt acordate pe baza unei situații definite legal, independent de orice apreciere discreționară?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.
Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Nancy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Levies on income from assets charged to a French resident insured under the Swiss social security scheme — Levies apportioned for the funding of two benefits administered by the French National Solidarity Fund for Independent Living — Direct and sufficiently relevant link with certain branches of social security — Definition of ‘social security benefit’ — Individual assessment of an applicant’s personal needs — Taking into account the applicant’s resources in calculating the amount of the benefits.
Case C-372/40 (2019)
Language: Swedish

Mot denna bakgrund beslutade den hänskjutande domstolen att vilandeförklara målet och ställa följande fråga till domstolen:
”Har de uttagna avgifterna som används för finansiering av [CNSA] och som bidrar till att finansiera [APA och PCH] ett direkt och tillräckligt relevant samband med någon eller några av de grenar av den sociala tryggheten som räknas upp i artikel 3 i förordning [nr 883/2004] och omfattas avgifterna därmed av denna förordnings tillämpningsområde enbart på den grunden att dessa förmåner avser en av de risker som räknas upp i den nämnda artikel 3 och att de beviljas utan skönmässig bedömning på grundval av en situation som definieras i lag?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Kammarrätten i Nancy, Frankrike)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "domstolen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
     
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Kammarrätten i Nancy, Frankrike)"->"fråga till domstolen";
  "fråga till domstolen"->"domstolen";
  "Cour administrative d’appel de Nancy (Kammarrätten i Nancy, Frankrike)"->"vilandeförklara målet"[dir=none];
  "fråga till domstolen"->"Har de uttagna avgifterna som används för finansiering av [CNSA] och som bidrar till att finansiera [APA och PCH] ett direkt och tillräckligt relevant samband med någon eller några av de grenar av den sociala tryggheten som räknas upp i artikel 3 i förordning [nr 883/2004] och omfattas avgifterna därmed av denna förordnings tillämpningsområde enbart på den grunden att dessa förmåner avser en av de risker som räknas upp i den nämnda artikel 3 och att de beviljas utan skönmässig bedömning på grundval av en situation som definieras i lag?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
Ágnes Weil v Géza Gulácsi.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szekszárdi Járásbíróság.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 66 — Temporal scope — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Material scope — Civil and commercial matters — Article 1(1) and (2)(a) — Matters excluded — Rights in property arising out of a matrimonial relationship — Article 54 — Application for the certificate certifying that the judgment given by the court of origin is enforceable — Judgment given concerning a debt stemming from the settlement of rights in property arising out of an unregistered non-marital partnership.
Case C-361/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

В периода от февруари 2002 г. до октомври 2006 г. г‑жа Weil и г‑н Gulácsi са живеели съвместно в нерегистрирано фактическо съпружеско съжителство по смисъла на член 685/A от Гражданския кодекс.
С решение на Szekszárdi Városi Bíróság (районен съд Szekszárd, Унгария), станало окончателно и изпълняемо на 23 април 2009 г., г‑н Gulácsi е осъден да заплати на г‑жа Weil сумата от 665133 унгарски форинта (HUF) (около 2060 EUR) заедно със съответните лихви за забава, поради прекратяването на режима на имуществени отношения, произтичащ от връзката им на партньори във фактическо съпружеско съжителство.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Mr Gulácsi"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Ms Weil"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Szekszárdi Városi Bíróság (районен съд Szekszárd, Унгария)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Mr Gulácsi"->"нерегистрирано фактическо съпружеско съжителство"[dir=none, style=bold];
  "нерегистрирано фактическо съпружеско съжителство"->"Ms Weil"[dir=none, style=bold];
  "нерегистрирано фактическо съпружеско съжителство"->"член 685/A от Гражданския кодекс"[dir=none];
  "Szekszárdi Városi Bíróság (районен съд Szekszárd, Унгария)"->"решение на Szekszárdi Városi Bíróság 23/04/2009";
  "решение на Szekszárdi Városi Bíróság 23/04/2009"->"Mr Gulácsi";
  "решение на Szekszárdi Városi Bíróság 23/04/2009"->"г-н Gulácsi е осъден да заплати на г-жа Weil сумата от 665133 унгарски форинта (HUF) (около 2060 EUR) 2060)"[dir=none];
}