mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Orașul Euskirchen este o autoritate competentă, în sensul articolului 2 litera (b) din Regulamentul nr. 1370/2007.
La 8 decembrie 2016, în conformitate cu articolul 7 alineatul (2) din acest regulament, orașul Euskirchen a publicat în suplimentul la Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene un anunț de intenție referitor la un proiect de atribuire directă a unui contract de servicii publice de transport de călători cu autobuzul și cu alte vehicule care nu avea forma unui contract de concesiune de servicii, în aplicarea articolului 5 alineatul (2) din regulamentul menționat.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Orașul Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Suplimentul la Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Article 7(2) of that regulation" [shape=trapezium];
    "Article 5(2) of that regulation" [shape=trapezium];
    
    "Orașul Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"A competent authority within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Regulation No 1370/2007" [dir=none];
    "Orașul Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"A publicat în suplimentul la Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene un anunț de intenție";
    "A publicat în suplimentul la Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene un anunț de intenție"->"Suplimentul la Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene";
    "A publicat în suplimentul la Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene un anunț de intenție"->"Article 7(2) of that regulation"[dir=none];
    "Suplimentul la Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene"->"Anunț de intenție referitor la un proiect de atribuire directă a unui contract de servicii publice de transport de călători cu autobuzul și cu alte vehicule care nu avea forma unui contract de concesiune de servicii"[dir=none];
    "Anunț de intenție referitor la un proiect de atribuire directă a unui contract de servicii publice de transport de călători cu autobuzul și cu alte vehicule care nu avea forma unui contract de concesiune de servicii"->"Article 5(2) of that regulation."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Mesto Euskirchen je príslušným orgánom v zmysle článku 2 písm. b) nariadenia č. 1370/2007.
Dňa 8. decembra 2016 mesto Euskirchen uverejnilo podľa článku 7 ods. 2 tohto nariadenia v dodatku k Úradnému vestníku Európskej únie oznam s predbežnými informáciami týkajúcimi sa zamýšľaného priameho zadania zmluvy o službe vo verejnom záujme v osobnej autobusovej doprave a osobnej doprave inými vozidlami, ktorá nemá formu koncesnej zmluvy na služby v súlade s článkom 5 ods. 2 uvedeného nariadenia.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Mesto Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "dodatku k Úradnému vestníku Európskej únie" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Article 7(2) of that regulation" [shape=trapezium];
    "Article 5(2) of that regulation" [shape=trapezium];
    
    "Mesto Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"A competent authority within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Regulation No 1370/2007" [dir=none];
    "Mesto Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"Dňa 8. decembra 2016 mesto Euskirchen uverejnilo podľa článku 7 ods. 2 tohto nariadenia v dodatku k Úradnému vestníku Európskej únie oznam s predbežnými informáciami";
    "Dňa 8. decembra 2016 mesto Euskirchen uverejnilo podľa článku 7 ods. 2 tohto nariadenia v dodatku k Úradnému vestníku Európskej únie oznam s predbežnými informáciami"->"dodatku k Úradnému vestníku Európskej únie";
    "Dňa 8. decembra 2016 mesto Euskirchen uverejnilo podľa článku 7 ods. 2 tohto nariadenia v dodatku k Úradnému vestníku Európskej únie oznam s predbežnými informáciami"->"Article 7(2) of that regulation"[dir=none];
    "dodatku k Úradnému vestníku Európskej únie"->"Oznam s predbežnými informáciami týkajúcimi sa zamýšľaného priameho zadania zmluvy o službe vo verejnom záujme v osobnej autobusovej doprave a osobnej doprave inými vozidlami, ktorá nemá formu koncesnej zmluvy na služby"[dir=none];
    "Oznam s predbežnými informáciami týkajúcimi sa zamýšľaného priameho zadania zmluvy o službe vo verejnom záujme v osobnej autobusovej doprave a osobnej doprave inými vozidlami, ktorá nemá formu koncesnej zmluvy na služby"->"Article 5(2) of that regulation."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Mesto Euskirchen je pristojni organ v smislu člena 2(b) Uredbe št. 1370/2007.
Mesto Euskirchen je 8. decembra 2016 v skladu s členom 7(2) te uredbe v dodatku k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije objavilo predhodno informativno obvestilo o nameravani neposredni sklenitvi pogodbe za naročilo javne službe potniškega prevoza z avtobusom in drugimi vozili, ki nima oblike koncesijske pogodbe za storitve, v skladu s členom 5(2) navedene uredbe.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Mesto Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Dodatku k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Article 7(2) of that regulation" [shape=trapezium];
    "Article 5(2) of that regulation" [shape=trapezium];
    
    "Mesto Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"A competent authority within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Regulation No 1370/2007" [dir=none];
    "Mesto Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"Objavilo predhodno informativno obvestilo v dodatku k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije";
    "Objavilo predhodno informativno obvestilo v dodatku k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije"->"Dodatku k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije";
    "Objavilo predhodno informativno obvestilo v dodatku k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije"->"Article 7(2) of that regulation"[dir=none];
    "Dodatku k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije"->"Predhodno informativno obvestilo o nameravani neposredni sklenitvi pogodbe za naročilo javne službe potniškega prevoza z avtobusom in drugimi vozili, ki nima oblike koncesijske pogodbe za storitve"[dir=none];
    "Predhodno informativno obvestilo o nameravani neposredni sklenitvi pogodbe za naročilo javne službe potniškega prevoza z avtobusom in drugimi vozili, ki nima oblike koncesijske pogodbe za storitve"->"Article 5(2) of that regulation."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Euskirchenin kaupunki on asetuksen N:o 1370/2007 2 artiklan b alakohdassa tarkoitettu toimivaltainen viranomainen.
Euskirchenin kaupunki on kyseisen asetuksen 7 artiklan 2 kohdan mukaisesti julkaissut 8.12.2016 Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden täydennysosassa ennakkoilmoituksen aikomuksesta valita suoraan sopimuspuoli linja-autoilla ja muilla ajoneuvoilla suoritettavia julkisia henkilöliikennepalveluja koskevalle hankintasopimukselle, joka ei ole mainitun asetuksen 5 artiklan 2 kohdassa tarkoitettu palveluja koskeva konsessiosopimus.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Euskirchenin kaupunki Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden täydennysosa" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Article 7(2) of that regulation" [shape=trapezium];
    "Article 5(2) of that regulation" [shape=trapezium];
    
    "Euskirchenin kaupunki Euskirchen"->"A competent authority within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Regulation No 1370/2007" [dir=none];
    "Euskirchenin kaupunki Euskirchen"->"Notice on 8.12.2016: Julkaissut 8.12.2016 Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden täydennysosassa ennakkoilmoituksen";
    "Notice on 8.12.2016: Julkaissut 8.12.2016 Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden täydennysosassa ennakkoilmoituksen"->"Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden täydennysosa";
    "Notice on 8.12.2016: Julkaissut 8.12.2016 Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden täydennysosassa ennakkoilmoituksen"->"Article 7(2) of that regulation"[dir=none];
    "Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden täydennysosa"->"Ennakkoilmoitus aikomuksesta valita suoraan sopimuspuoli linja-autoilla ja muilla ajoneuvoilla suoritettavia julkisia henkilöliikennepalveluja koskevalle hankintasopimukselle, joka ei ole mainitun asetuksen 5 artiklan 2 kohdassa tarkoitettu palveluja koskeva konsessiosopimus."[dir=none];
    "Ennakkoilmoitus aikomuksesta valita suoraan sopimuspuoli linja-autoilla ja muilla ajoneuvoilla suoritettavia julkisia henkilöliikennepalveluja koskevalle hankintasopimukselle, joka ei ole mainitun asetuksen 5 artiklan 2 kohdassa tarkoitettu palveluja koskeva konsessiosopimus."->"Article 5(2) of that regulation."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Staden Euskirchen är en behörig myndighet i den mening som avses i artikel 2 b i förordning nr 1370/2007.
I enlighet med artikel 7.2 i den förordningen offentliggjorde staden Euskirchen den 8 december 2016, i tillägget till Europeiska unionens officiella tidning, ett förhandsmeddelande om direkttilldelning av ett avtal avseende kollektivtrafik med buss och andra motorfordon som inte tilldelades i form av en koncession om tjänster enligt artikel 5.2 i förordningen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Staden Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Tillägget till Europeiska unionens officiella tidning" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Article 7(2) of that regulation" [shape=trapezium];
    "Article 5(2) of that regulation" [shape=trapezium];
    
    "Staden Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"A competent authority within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Regulation No 1370/2007" [dir=none];
    "Staden Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"Offentliggjorde staden Euskirchen den 8 december 2016, i tillägget till Europeiska unionens officiella tidning, ett förhandsmeddelande";
    "Offentliggjorde staden Euskirchen den 8 december 2016, i tillägget till Europeiska unionens officiella tidning, ett förhandsmeddelande"->"Tillägget till Europeiska unionens officiella tidning";
    "Offentliggjorde staden Euskirchen den 8 december 2016, i tillägget till Europeiska unionens officiella tidning, ett förhandsmeddelande"->"Article 7(2) of that regulation"[dir=none];
    "Tillägget till Europeiska unionens officiella tidning"->"Ett förhandsmeddelande om direkttilldelning av ett avtal avseende kollektivtrafik med buss och andra motorfordon som inte tilldelades i form av en koncession om tjänster"[dir=none];
    "Ett förhandsmeddelande om direkttilldelning av ett avtal avseende kollektivtrafik med buss och andra motorfordon som inte tilldelades i form av en koncession om tjänster"->"Article 5(2) of that regulation."[dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: English

In terms of that prior information notice, that contract, which covered an annual distance of more than a million kilometres, was to be awarded to SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (‘SVE’), a company wholly owned by the City of Euskirchen, for a period of 120 months from 1 January 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "City of Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "City of Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"The contract will be awarded to SVE"[dir=none];
    "City of Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="Awarded contract"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

Съгласно това обявление за предварителна информация тази поръчка, чийто предмет е изпълнението на транспортни услуги за повече от един милион километра годишно, трябва да бъде възложена за срок от 120 месеца, считано от 1 януари 2019 г., на SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (наричано по-нататък „SVE“) — дружество, чийто капитал е собственост изцяло на град Ойскирхен.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "град Ойскирхен Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "град Ойскирхен Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"поръчката трябва да бъде възложена на SVE"[dir=none];
    "град Ойскирхен Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="възложена за срок от 120 месеца"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

A tenor de dicho anuncio de información previa, dicho contrato, que tenía por objeto la realización anual de más de un millón de kilómetros, debía adjudicarse a SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (en lo sucesivo, «SVE»), sociedad perteneciente en su totalidad al Ayuntamiento de Euskirchen, para un período de 120 meses a partir del 1 de enero de 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"debía adjudicarse a SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="debía adjudicarse a SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Podle tohoto předběžného oznámení měla být uvedená zakázka, která se týkala roční provozu nad milion kilometrů ročně, zadána na dobu 120 měsíců ode dne 1. ledna 2019 společnosti SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (dále jen „SVE“), kterou plně vlastnilo město Euskirchen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "město Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "město Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"Zakázka měla být zadána společnosti SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "město Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="zadána zakázka"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

I henhold til denne forhåndsmeddelelse skulle den nævnte kontrakt, som vedrørte den årlige gennemførelse af mere end 1 mio. km, indgås med SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (herefter »SVE«), som var et selskab, der var helejet af Stadt Euskirchen, for 120 måneder fra den 1. januar 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Stadt Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Stadt Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"kontrakten skulle indgås med SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "Stadt Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="den nævnte kontrakt"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: German

Nach dieser Vorabinformation sollte der genannte Auftrag über die jährliche Erbringung von mehr als einer Million Kilometern für eine Dauer von 120 Monaten ab dem 1. Januar 2019 an die SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (im Folgenden: SVE) vergeben werden, ein Unternehmen, das gänzlich von der Stadt Euskirchen gehalten wird.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Stadt Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Stadt Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"der genannte Auftrag sollte an die SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH vergeben werden SVE"[dir=none];
    "Stadt Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="vergeben werden"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Eelteate kohaselt pidi nimetatud leping, mille maht oli üle ühe miljoni kilomeetri aastas, sõlmitama äriühinguga SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (edaspidi „SVE“), kelle kogu kapital kuulub Euskircheni linnale, 120 kalendrikuuks alates 1. jaanuarist 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Euskircheni linnale Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Euskircheni linnale Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"leping, mille maht oli üle ühe miljoni kilomeetri aastas, sõlmitama äriühinguga SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "Euskircheni linnale Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="nimetatud leping"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Σύμφωνα με την ως άνω προκήρυξη προκαταρκτικής ενημέρωσης, η εν λόγω σύμβαση, η οποία αφορούσε την πραγματοποίηση άνω του ενός εκατομμυρίου χιλιομέτρων ανά έτος, επρόκειτο να ανατεθεί στη SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (στο εξής: SVE), εταιρία ανήκουσα εξ ολοκλήρου στην πόλη του Euskirchen, για διάρκεια 120 μηνών από την 1η Ιανουαρίου 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "πόλη του Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "πόλη του Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"επρόκειτο να ανατεθεί στη SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "πόλη του Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="να ανατεθεί στη SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: French

Aux termes de cet avis de préinformation, ledit marché, qui portait sur l’exécution annuelle de plus d’un million de kilomètres, devait être attribué à SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (ci-après « SVE »), société détenue en totalité par la ville d’Euskirchen, pour une durée de 120 mois à compter du 1er janvier 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "ville d’Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "ville d’Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"le marché devait être attribué à SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "ville d’Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="devait être attribué à SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

U skladu s tom prethodnom informacijskom obavijesti, navedeni ugovor o javnoj nabavi koji se odnosio na pokrivanje više od milijun kilometara godišnje, trebao je biti dodijeljen SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchenu GmbH (u daljnjem tekstu: SVE), društvu čiji je jedini vlasnik grad Euskirchen, u trajanju od 120 mjeseci od 1. siječnja 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"Ugovor bi trebao biti dodijeljen SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchenu GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="dodijeljen ugovor o javnoj nabavi"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

In base a tale avviso di preinformazione, il suddetto appalto, che riguardava l’esecuzione annuale di oltre un milione di chilometri, doveva essere attribuito alla SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (in prosieugo: la «SVE»), società interamente di proprietà della città di Euskirchen, per un periodo di 120 mesi a decorrere dal 1o gennaio 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "città di Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "città di Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"l'appalto doveva essere attribuito alla SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "città di Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="attribuito alla SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Atbilstoši šim sākotnējās informācijas paziņojumam minētais līgums, kurš attiecās uz ikgadēju vairāk nekā miljonu kilometru veikšanu, bija jāpiešķir SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (turpmāk tekstā – “SVE”), sabiedrībai kura pilnībā pieder Eiskirhenes pilsētai, uz 120 mēnešu laikposmu, no 2019. gada 1. janvāra.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Eiskirhenes pilsētai Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Eiskirhenes pilsētai Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"Līgums bija jāpiešķir SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "Eiskirhenes pilsētai Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="bija jāpiešķir"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

Šiame išankstiniame informaciniame skelbime buvo nurodyta, kad minėta sutartis, susijusi su daugiau nei 1 mln. kilometrų nuvažiavimu per metus, turėjo būti sudaryta su SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (toliau – SVE), Oiskircheno miestui visiškai priklausančia bendrove, 120 mėnesių laikotarpiui nuo 2019 m. sausio 1 d.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Oiskircheno miestui Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Oiskircheno miestui Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"Sutartis turėjo būti sudaryta su SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "Oiskircheno miestui Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="minėta sutartis"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

Ezen előzetes tájékoztató hirdetmény értelmében az említett szerződést, amely évente több mint egymillió kilométer teljesítésére vonatkozott, a 2019. január 1‑jétől kezdődő 120 hónapos időtartamra teljes egészében az Euskirchen városa tulajdonában álló SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (a továbbiakban: SVE) részére tervezték odaítélni.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Euskirchen városa Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Euskirchen városa Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"A szerződést az Euskirchen városa tulajdonában álló SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (a továbbiakban: SVE) részére tervezték odaítélni. SVE"[dir=none];
    "Euskirchen városa Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="odaítélni"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Skont dan l-avviż ta’ informazzjoni minn qabel, l-imsemmi kuntratt, li kien jirrigwarda l-eżekuzzjoni ta’ miljun kilometru fis-sena, kellu jingħata lil SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (iktar ’il quddiem “SVE”), li hija kumpannija miżmuma kollha kemm hi mill-belt ta’ Euskirchen, għal tul ta’ 120 xahar sa mill-1 ta’ Jannar 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"l-imsemmi kuntratt, kellu jingħata lil SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="l-imsemmi kuntratt, li kien jirrigwarda l-eżekuzzjoni ta’ miljun kilometru fis-sena, kellu jingħata lil SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Volgens deze vooraankondiging moest die opdracht, die betrekking had op de levering van meer dan een miljoen vervoerskilometers per jaar, met ingang van 1 januari 2019 voor 120 maanden worden gegund aan SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (hierna: „SVE”), een onderneming die voor 100 % in handen is van de stad Euskirchen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "stad Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "stad Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"de opdracht wordt gegund aan SVE"[dir=none];
    "stad Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="worden gegund"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Zgodnie ze wspomnianym wstępnym ogłoszeniem informacyjnym zamówienie to, które dotyczyło wykonania przejazdów na trasach o łącznej długości ponad miliona kilometrów rocznie, miało zostać udzielone spółce SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (zwanej dalej „SVE”), należącej w całości do miasta Euskirchen, na okres 120 miesięcy, począwszy od dnia 1 stycznia 2019 r.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"zamówienie to miało zostać udzielone spółce SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="udzielone zamówienie"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Nos termos deste anúncio de informação prévia, o referido contrato, que tinha por objeto a execução anual de mais de um milhão de quilómetros, devia ser adjudicado à SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (a seguir «SVE»), sociedade totalmente detida pela cidade de Euskirchen, por uma duração de 120 meses a partir de 1 de janeiro de 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "cidade de Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "cidade de Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"o contrato devia ser adjudicado à SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "cidade de Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="adjudicado à SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Potrivit acestui anunț de intenție, contractul respectiv, care privea efectuarea anuală a peste un milion de kilometri, urma să fie atribuit societății SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (denumită în continuare „SVE”), societate deținută în întregime de orașul Euskirchen, pentru o perioadă de 120 de luni, începând cu 1 ianuarie 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "orașul Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "orașul Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"Contractul urma să fie atribuit societății SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "orașul Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="contractul respectiv"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Podľa tohto oznámenia o predbežných informáciách mala byť uvedená zmluva, v ktorej išlo o ročné plnenie viac ako jeden milión kilometrov, zadaná spoločnosti SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (ďalej len „SVE“), ktorá je v úplnom vlastníctve mesta Euskirchen, na obdobie 120 mesiacov od 1. januára 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"Zmluva mala byť zadaná spoločnosti SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="zadaná zmluva"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

V skladu s tem predhodnim informativnim obvestilom bi moralo biti to naročilo, ki se je nanašalo na izvedbo več kot milijona kilometrov letno, za obdobje 120 mesecev od 1. januarja 2019 oddano SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (v nadaljevanju: SVE), ki je družba, ki je v celoti v lasti mesta Euskirchen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"naročilo bi moralo biti oddano SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="oddano SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Ennakkoilmoituksen mukaan tämän hankintasopimuksen, jonka kohteena oli yli miljoonan kilometrin liikennöinti vuosittain, sopimuspuoleksi oli tarkoitus valita SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (jäljempänä SVE), joka on Euskirchenin kaupungin kokonaan omistama yhtiö, 120 kuukaudeksi 1.1.2019 alkaen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Euskirchenin kaupungin Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "Euskirchenin kaupungin Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"Sopimuspuoleksi oli tarkoitus valita SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "Euskirchenin kaupungin Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="hankintasopimuksen"]
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.
Case C-253/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Enligt lydelsen i detta förhandsmeddelande skulle avtalet, som avsåg transporttjänster på mer än 1 miljon kilometer årligen, tilldelas det av staden Euskirchen helägda bolaget SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH (nedan kallat SVE), för en period på 120 månader från och med den 1 januari 2019.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "staden Euskirchen Euskirchen" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "staden Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [dir=none];
    "SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"->"avtalet skulle tilldelas det av staden Euskirchen helägda bolaget SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH SVE"[dir=none];
    "staden Euskirchen Euskirchen"->"SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH" [label="tilldelas det av staden Euskirchen helägda bolaget SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH"]
    
    
}
Van Gend en Loos v Administratie der Belastingen 
C-26/62 (1963)
Language: English

5. On 20 September 1960 Van Gend & Loos lodged an objection with the Inspector of Customs and Excise at Zaandam against the application of this duty in the present case. The company put forward in particular the following arguments:
On 1 January 1958, the date on which the EEC Treaty entered into force, aminoplasts in emulsion were classified under heading 279-a-2 of the tariff in the 'Tariefbesluit' of 1947, and charged with an ad valorem import duty of 3%. In the 'Tariefbesluit' which entered into force on 1 March 1960, heading 279-a-2 was replaced by heading 39.01-a. Instead of applying, in respect Instead of applying, in respect of intra-Community trade, an import duty of 3% uniformly to all products under the old heading 279-a-2, a sub-division was created: 39.01-a-l, which contained only aminoplasts in aqueous emulsions, dispersions or solutions, and in respect of which import duty was fixed at 8%. For the other products in heading 39.01-a, which also had been included in the old heading 279-a-2, the import duty of 3;% applied on 1 January 1958 was maintained. By thus increasing the import duty on the product in question after the entry into force of the EEC Treaty, the Dutch Government infringed Article 12 of that Treaty, which provides that Member States shall refrain from introducing between themselves any new customs duties on imports or exports or any charges having equivalent effect, and from increasing those which they already apply in their trade with each other.
6. The objection of Van Gend & Loos was dismissed on 6 March 1961 by the Inspector of Customs and Excise at Zaandam on the ground of inadmissibility, because it was not directed against the actual application of the tariff but against the rate.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];

   "the Inspector of Customs and Excise at Zaandam"->"Van Gend & Loos"[label="Dismissed on the ground of inadmissibility 06/03/1961"];
   "Van Gend & Loos"->"the Inspector of Customs and Excise at Zaandam"[label="lodged an objection 20/09/1960"];

}
Van Gend en Loos v Administratie der Belastingen 
C-26/62 (1963)
Language: German

5. Am 20. September 1960 hat die Firma Van Gend & Loos bei dem Inspekteur der Einfuhrzölle und Verbrauchssteuern in Zaandam Beschwerde gegen die Anwendung dieses Zollsatzes im vorliegenden Fall erhoben.
Sie hat insbesondere folgende Gründe vorgebracht:
Am 1. Januar 1958, dem Zeitpunkt des Inkrafttretens des EWG-Vertrages, seien die Aminoplaste in Emulsionen unter Tarifnummer 279-a-2 des zum Tariefbesluit von 1947 gehören den Tarifs eingeordnet und mit einem Einfuhrwertzoll von 3% belastet gewesen. In dem am 1. März 1960 in Kraft getretenen Tariefbesluit sei die Tarifnummer 39.01-a an die Stelle der Tarifnummer 279-a-2 getreten. Anstatt für den Warenaustausch innerhalb der Gemein schaft auf die Erzeugnisse der früheren Tarifnummer 279-a-2 einheitlich einen Einfuhrzollsatz von 3 % anzuwenden, habe man eine Untereinteilung vorgenommen: Für die Tarifnummer 39.01-a-1, die ausschließlich die Aminoplaste in wäßriger Emulsion, in wäßriger Dispersion oder in wäßriger Lösung enthalte, sei der Einfuhrzoll auf 8 % festgesetzt worden, während für die anderen Erzeugnisse der Tarifnummer 39.01-a, die früher ebenfalls zu der Tarifnummer 279-a-2 gehört hätten, der am 1. Januar 1958 geltende Einfuhrzollsatz von 3 % beibehalten worden sei.
Mit der Erhöhung des Einfuhrzolls für das in Rede stehende Erzeugnis nach dem Inkrafttreten des EWG-Vertrages habe die niederländische Regierung gegen Artikel 12 dieses Vertrages verstoßen, wonach die Mitgliedstaaten untereinander weder neue Einfuhr- oder Ausfuhrzölle oder Abgaben gleicher Wirkung einführen, noch die in ihren gegenseitigen Handels beziehungen angewandten erhöhen dürften.
6. Die Beschwerde der Firma Van Gend & Loos ist am 6. März durch den Inspekteur der Einfuhrzölle und Verbrauchs steuern in Zaandam als unzulässig verworfen worden, da sie nicht gegen die eigentliche Anwendung des Tarifs, sondern gegen die Höhe seines Zollsatzes gerichtet sei.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];

   "dem Inspekteur der Einfuhrzölle und Verbrauchssteuern in Zaandam"->"Van Gend & Loos"[label="Abgewiesen wegen Unzulässigkeit 06/03/1961"];
   "Van Gend & Loos"->"dem Inspekteur der Einfuhrzölle und Verbrauchssteuern in Zaandam"[label="legte Einspruch ein 20/09/1960"];

}