mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/31 (2019)
Language: Hungarian

A luxemburgi hatóságok 2014. november 5‑én az N. Aubriet által a strasbourgi felsőfokú tanulmányokra vonatkozóan előterjesztett pénzügyi támogatás iránti kérelmet elutasították a 2014. július 24‑i törvény 3. cikke (5) bekezdésének b) pontja alapján, azzal az indokkal, hogy B. Aubriet nem végzett szakmai tevékenységet a Luxemburgi Nagyhercegségben a pénzügyi támogatás iránti kérelem benyújtásának időpontjától, azaz 2014. szeptember 29‑től visszamenőlegesen számított hétéves referencia‑időszak folyamán legalább öt évig.
N. Aubriet 2015. május 6‑án keresetet indított ezen elutasító határozattal szemben a Tribunal administratif de Luxembourg (luxemburgi közigazgatási bíróság) előtt. Ezen eljárást a 2016. december 14‑i Bragança Linares Verruga és társai ítélet (C‑238/15, EU:C:2016:949) alapjául szolgáló ügyben előterjesztett előzetes döntéshozatalra utalást követően felfüggesztették.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (luxemburgi közigazgatási bíróság)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "N. Aubriet Aubriet junior"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "2014. július 24‑i törvény 3. cikke (5) bekezdésének b) pontja 2014"[shape=trapezium];
  "A luxemburgi hatóságok"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "A luxemburgi hatóságok"->"kérelmet elutasították 05/11/2014";
  "kérelmet elutasították 05/11/2014"->"N. Aubriet Aubriet junior";
  "kérelmet elutasították 05/11/2014"->"N. Aubriet Aubriet B. Aubriet nem végzett szakmai tevékenységet a Luxemburgi Nagyhercegségben a pénzügyi támogatás iránti kérelem benyújtásának időpontjától, azaz 2014. szeptember 29‑től visszamenőlegesen számított hétéves referencia‑időszak folyamán legalább öt évig."[dir=none];
  "kérelmet elutasították 05/11/2014"->"2014. július 24‑i törvény 3. cikke (5) bekezdésének b) pontja 2014"[dir=none];
  "N. Aubriet Aubriet junior"->"Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (luxemburgi közigazgatási bíróság)"[label="keresetet indított 06/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/32 (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fil-5 ta’ Novembru 2014, l-awtoritajiet Lussemburgiżi rrifjutaw it-talba ta’ Aubriet l-iben intiża li jikseb għajnuna finanzjarja biex isegwi l-edukazzjoni ogħla tiegħu fi Strasbourg, fuq il-bażi tal-Artikolu 3(5)(b) tal-Liġi tal-24 ta’ Lulju 2014, minħabba li Aubriet il-missier ma kienx eżerċita attività professjonali fil-Lussemburgu għal mill-inqas ħames snin fuq perijodu ta’ riferiment ta’ seba’ snin, ikkalkolat b’mod retroattiv mid-29 ta’ Settembru 2014, id-data tat-tressiq tat-talba għall-għajnuna finanzjarja.
Fis-6 ta’ Mejju 2015, Aubriet l-iben ippreżenta rikors kontra dan ir-rifjut quddiem it-Tribunal administratif (it-Tribunal Amministrattiv, il-Lussemburgu). Dan ir-rikors ġie sospiż wara li intervjena rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari fil-kawża li tat lok għas-sentenza tal-14 ta’ Diċembru 2016, Bragança Linares Verruga et (C‑238/15, EU:C:2016:949).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (Tribunal Amministrattiv, il-Lussemburgu)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Aubriet l-iben Aubriet l-iben"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Artikolu 3(5)(b) tal-Liġi tal-24 ta’ Lulju 2014 2014"[shape=trapezium];
  "l-awtoritajiet Lussemburgiżi"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "l-awtoritajiet Lussemburgiżi"->"rrifjutaw it-talba 05/11/2014";
  "rrifjutaw it-talba 05/11/2014"->"Aubriet l-iben Aubriet l-iben";
  "rrifjutaw it-talba 05/11/2014"->"Aubriet l-iben Aubriet Aubriet il-missier ma kienx eżerċita attività professjonali fil-Lussemburgu għal mill-inqas ħames snin fuq perijodu ta’ riferiment ta’ seba’ snin"[dir=none];
  "rrifjutaw it-talba 05/11/2014"->"Artikolu 3(5)(b) tal-Liġi tal-24 ta’ Lulju 2014 2014"[dir=none];
  "Aubriet l-iben Aubriet l-iben"->"Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (Tribunal Amministrattiv, il-Lussemburgu)"[label="ippreżenta rikors 06/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/34 (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 5 listopada 2014 r. władze luksemburskie odrzuciły wniosek N. Aubrieta o przyznanie pomocy finansowej na naukę w szkole wyższej w Strasburgu na podstawie art. 3 ust. 5 lit. b) ustawy z dnia 24 lipca 2014 r., uzasadniając to tym, że B. Aubriet nie wykonywał działalności zawodowej w Luksemburgu przez co najmniej pięć lat w trakcie siedmioletniego okresu odniesienia, liczonego wstecz od dnia 29 września 2014 r., tj. daty złożenia wniosku o pomoc finansową.
W dniu 6 maja 2015 r. N. Aubriet wniósł skargę na tę decyzję odmowną do Tribunal administratif (sądu administracyjnego, Luksemburg). Postępowanie w przedmiocie skargi zostało zawieszone w następstwie odesłania prejudycjalnego w sprawie zakończonej wyrokiem z dnia 14 grudnia 2016 r., Bragança Linares Verruga i in. (C‑238/15, EU:C:2016:949).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (sądu administracyjnego, Luksemburg)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "N. Aubriet Aubriet junior"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "art. 3 ust. 5 lit. b) ustawy z dnia 24 lipca 2014 r. 2014"[shape=trapezium];
  "władze luksemburskie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "władze luksemburskie"->"odrzuciły wniosek 05/11/2014";
  "odrzuciły wniosek 05/11/2014"->"N. Aubriet Aubriet junior";
  "odrzuciły wniosek 05/11/2014"->"N. Aubriet Aubriet B. Aubriet nie wykonywał działalności zawodowej w Luksemburgu przez co najmniej pięć lat w trakcie siedmioletniego okresu odniesienia"[dir=none];
  "odrzuciły wniosek 05/11/2014"->"art. 3 ust. 5 lit. b) ustawy z dnia 24 lipca 2014 r. 2014"[dir=none];
  "N. Aubriet Aubriet junior"->"Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (sądu administracyjnego, Luksemburg)"[label="N. Aubriet wniósł skargę 06/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/35 (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 5 de novembro de 2014, as autoridades luxemburguesas indeferiram o pedido de Aubriet‑filho destinado a obter um auxílio financeiro para prosseguir os seus estudos superiores em Estrasburgo, com base no artigo 3.o, n.o 5, alínea b), da Lei de 24 de julho de 2014, pelo facto de Aubriet‑pai não ter exercido uma atividade profissional no Luxemburgo durante pelo menos cinco anos no decurso de um período de referência de sete anos calculado retroativamente a partir de 29 de setembro de 2014, data da apresentação do pedido de auxílio financeiro.
Em 6 de maio de 2015, Aubriet‑filho intentou uma ação contra este indeferimento no Tribunal administratif (Tribunal Administrativo, Luxemburgo). Esta ação foi suspensa na sequência do reenvio prejudicial no processo que deu origem ao Acórdão de 14 de dezembro de 2016, Bragança Linares Verruga e o. (C‑238/15, EU:C:2016:949).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (Tribunal Administrativo, Luxemburgo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Aubriet‑filho Aubriet Aubriet‑filho"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artigo 3.o, n.o 5, alínea b), da Lei de 24 de julho de 2014 2014"[shape=trapezium];
  "as autoridades luxemburguesas"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "as autoridades luxemburguesas"->"indeferiram o pedido 05/11/2014";
  "indeferiram o pedido 05/11/2014"->"Aubriet‑filho Aubriet Aubriet‑filho";
  "indeferiram o pedido 05/11/2014"->"Aubriet‑filho Aubriet Aubriet‑pai não ter exercido uma atividade profissional no Luxemburgo durante pelo menos cinco anos no decurso de um período de referência de sete anos"[dir=none];
  "indeferiram o pedido 05/11/2014"->"artigo 3.o, n.o 5, alínea b), da Lei de 24 de julho de 2014 2014"[dir=none];
  "Aubriet‑filho Aubriet Aubriet‑filho"->"Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (Tribunal Administrativo, Luxemburgo)"[label="intentou uma ação 06/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/36 (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 5 noiembrie 2014, autoritățile luxemburgheze au respins cererea domnului Aubriet fiul privind obținerea unui ajutor financiar pentru a‑și urma studiile superioare la Strasbourg în temeiul articolului 3 alineatul (5) litera (b) din Legea din 24 iulie 2014, pentru motivul că domnul Aubriet tatăl nu desfășurase în Luxemburg o activitate profesională timp de cel puțin cinci ani într‑o perioadă de referință de șapte ani, calculată retroactiv începând de la 29 septembrie 2014, data formulării cererii de ajutor financiar.
La 6 mai 2015, domnul Aubriet fiul a introdus o acțiune împotriva acestui refuz la Tribunal administratif (Luxembourg) (Tribunalul Administrativ, Luxemburg). Această acțiune a fost suspendată ca urmare a trimiterii preliminare intervenite în cauza în care s‑a pronunțat Hotărârea din 14 decembrie 2016, Bragança Linares Verruga și alții (C‑238/15, EU:C:2016:949).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (Tribunalul Administrativ, Luxemburg)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "domnul Aubriet domnul Aubriet fiul"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "articolului 3 alineatul (5) litera (b) din Legea din 24 iulie 2014 2014"[shape=trapezium];
  "autoritățile luxemburgheze"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "autoritățile luxemburgheze"->"au respins cererea 05/11/2014";
  "au respins cererea 05/11/2014"->"domnul Aubriet domnul Aubriet fiul";
  "au respins cererea 05/11/2014"->"domnul Aubriet domnul Aubriet tatăl nu desfășurase în Luxemburg o activitate profesională timp de cel puțin cinci ani într‑o perioadă de referință de șapte ani"[dir=none];
  "au respins cererea 05/11/2014"->"articolului 3 alineatul (5) litera (b) din Legea din 24 iulie 2014 2014"[dir=none];
  "domnul Aubriet domnul Aubriet fiul"->"Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (Tribunalul Administrativ, Luxemburg)"[label="a introdus o acțiune 06/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/37 (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 5. novembra 2014 luxemburské orgány zamietli žiadosť pána Aubrieta mladšieho o získanie finančnej pomoci na jeho vyššie odborné štúdium v Štrasburgu na základe článku 3 ods. 5 písm. b) zákona z 24. júla 2014 z toho dôvodu, že pán Aubriet starší nevykonával v Luxembursku pracovnú činnosť najmenej päť rokov v rámci referenčného obdobia siedmich rokov, ktoré sa ráta spätne od 29. septembra 2014, dňa podania žiadosti o poskytnutie finančnej podpory na vyššie odborné štúdium.
Dňa 6. mája 2015 podal pán Aubriet mladší žalobu proti tomuto zamietnutiu na Tribunal administratif (Luxembourg) (Správny súd, Luxembursko). Toto konanie bolo prerušené po podaní návrhu na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý viedol k rozsudku zo 14. decembra 2016, Bragança Linares Verruga a i. (C‑238/15, EU:C:2016:949).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (Správny súd, Luxembursko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "pán Aubriet mladší"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "článku 3 ods. 5 písm. b) zákona z 24. júla 2014 2014"[shape=trapezium];
  "luxemburské orgány"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "luxemburské orgány"->"orgány zamietli žiadosť pána Aubrieta mladšieho o získanie finančnej pomoci na jeho vyššie odborné štúdium v Štrasburgu 05/11/2014";
  "orgány zamietli žiadosť pána Aubrieta mladšieho o získanie finančnej pomoci na jeho vyššie odborné štúdium v Štrasburgu 05/11/2014"->"pán Aubriet mladší";
  "orgány zamietli žiadosť pána Aubrieta mladšieho o získanie finančnej pomoci na jeho vyššie odborné štúdium v Štrasburgu 05/11/2014"->"pán Aubriet pán Aubriet starší nevykonával v Luxembursku pracovnú činnosť najmenej päť rokov v rámci referenčného obdobia siedmich rokov"[dir=none];
  "orgány zamietli žiadosť pána Aubrieta mladšieho o získanie finančnej pomoci na jeho vyššie odborné štúdium v Štrasburgu 05/11/2014"->"článku 3 ods. 5 písm. b) zákona z 24. júla 2014 2014"[dir=none];
  "pán Aubriet mladší"->"Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (Správny súd, Luxembursko)"[label="podal pán Aubriet mladší žalobu 06/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/38 (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Luksemburški organi so 5. novembra 2014 prošnjo N. Aubrieta (sin) za finančno pomoč za visokošolski študij v Strasbourgu na podlagi člena 3(5)(b) zakona z dne 24. julija 2014 zavrnili, pri čemer so kot razlog navedli, da B. Aubriet (oče) ni opravljal poklicne dejavnosti v Luksemburgu vsaj pet let v sedemletnem referenčnem obdobju, izračunanem retroaktivno od 29. septembra 2014, ko je bila vložena prošnja za finančno pomoč.
N. Aubriet (sin) je 6. maja 2015 zoper to zavrnitev vložil tožbo pri Tribunal administratif (upravno sodišče, Luksemburg). Postopek s to tožbo je bil po vložitvi predloga za sprejetje predhodne odločbe v zadevi, v kateri je bila izdana sodba z dne 14. decembra 2016, Bragança Linares Verruga in drugi (C‑238/15, EU:C:2016:949), prekinjen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (upravno sodišče, Luksemburg)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "N. Aubriet (sin) Aubriet N. Aubriet (sin)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "člena 3(5)(b) zakona z dne 24. julija 2014 2014"[shape=trapezium];
  "Luksemburški organi"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Luksemburški organi"->"zavrnili prošnjo 05/11/2014";
  "zavrnili prošnjo 05/11/2014"->"N. Aubriet (sin) Aubriet N. Aubriet (sin)";
  "zavrnili prošnjo 05/11/2014"->"N. Aubriet (sin) Aubriet B. Aubriet (oče) ni opravljal poklicne dejavnosti v Luksemburgu vsaj pet let v sedemletnem referenčnem obdobju"[dir=none];
  "zavrnili prošnjo 05/11/2014"->"člena 3(5)(b) zakona z dne 24. julija 2014 2014"[dir=none];
  "N. Aubriet (sin) Aubriet N. Aubriet (sin)"->"Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (upravno sodišče, Luksemburg)"[label="je 6. maja 2015 zoper to zavrnitev vložil tožbo 06/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/39 (2019)
Language: Finnish

Luxemburgin viranomaiset hylkäsivät 5.11.2014 hakemuksen, jonka Nicolas Aubriet oli jättänyt saadakseen 24.7.2014 annetun lain 3 §:n 5 momentin b kohdan nojalla taloudellista tukea korkeakouluopintoihinsa Strasbourgissa, sillä perusteella, että Bruno Aubriet ei ollut työskennellyt Luxemburgissa vähintään viittä vuotta sinä seitsemän vuoden viitekautena, joka laskettiin taannehtivasti 29.9.2014 alkaen eli siitä päivästä alkaen, jona hakemus taloudellista tuesta oli jätetty.
Nicolas Aubriet haki 6.5.2015 tuen epäämiseen muutosta Tribunal administratifilta (hallintotuomioistuin, Luxemburg). Muutoksenhaun käsittelyä lykättiin sen ennakkoratkaisupyynnön seurauksena, joka esitettiin 14.12.2016 annettuun tuomioon Bragança Linares Verruga ym. (C‑238/15, EU:C:2016:949) johtaneessa asiassa.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (hallintotuomioistuin, Luxemburg)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Nicolas Aubriet Aubriet junior"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "24.7.2014 annetun lain 3 §:n 5 momentin b kohdan 2014"[shape=trapezium];
  "Luxemburgin viranomaiset"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Luxemburgin viranomaiset"->"hylkäsivät 5.11.2014 hakemuksen 05/11/2014";
  "hylkäsivät 5.11.2014 hakemuksen 05/11/2014"->"Nicolas Aubriet Aubriet junior";
  "hylkäsivät 5.11.2014 hakemuksen 05/11/2014"->"Nicolas Aubriet Aubriet Bruno Aubriet ei ollut työskennellyt Luxemburgissa vähintään viittä vuotta sinä seitsemän vuoden viitekautena"[dir=none];
  "hylkäsivät 5.11.2014 hakemuksen 05/11/2014"->"24.7.2014 annetun lain 3 §:n 5 momentin b kohdan 2014"[dir=none];
  "Nicolas Aubriet Aubriet junior"->"Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (hallintotuomioistuin, Luxemburg)"[label="haki ... muutosta Tribunal administratifilta 06/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/40 (2019)
Language: Swedish

Den 5 november 2014 avslog luxemburgska myndigheter sonen Aubriets ansökan om att beviljas studiemedel för att fullfölja sin högre utbildning i Strasbourg. Avslagsbeslutet grundades på artikel 3.5 b i lagen av den 24 juli 2014 och motiverades med att fadern Aubriet inte hade utövat yrkesverksamhet i Luxemburg under minst fem år under en sjuårig referensperiod, retroaktivt beräknad från och med den 29 september 2014, vilket är dagen då studiemedelsansökan lämnades in.
Den 6 maj 2015 väckte sonen Aubriet talan mot avslagsbeslutet vid Tribunal administratif de Luxembourg (Förvaltningsrätten i Luxemburg). Målet vilandeförklarades på grund av den begäran om förhandsavgörande som framställts i det mål som avgjordes genom dom av den 14 december 2016, Bragança Linares Verruga m.fl., (C‑238/15, EU:C:2016:949).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (Förvaltningsrätten i Luxemburg)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Aubriet Aubriet sonen Aubriet"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artikel 3.5 b i lagen av den 24 juli 2014 2014"[shape=trapezium];
  "luxemburgska myndigheter"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "luxemburgska myndigheter"->"Avslog luxemburgska myndigheter sonen Aubriets ansökan 05/11/2014";
  "Avslog luxemburgska myndigheter sonen Aubriets ansökan 05/11/2014"->"Aubriet Aubriet sonen Aubriet";
  "Avslog luxemburgska myndigheter sonen Aubriets ansökan 05/11/2014"->"Aubriet Aubriet fadern Aubriet inte hade utövat yrkesverksamhet i Luxemburg under minst fem år under en sjuårig referensperiod"[dir=none];
  "Avslog luxemburgska myndigheter sonen Aubriets ansökan 05/11/2014"->"artikel 3.5 b i lagen av den 24 juli 2014 2014"[dir=none];
  "Aubriet Aubriet sonen Aubriet"->"Tribunal Administratif, Luxembourg (Förvaltningsrätten i Luxemburg)"[label="väckte sonen Aubriet talan 06/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/18 (2019)
Language: English

In those circumstances the Tribunal administratif (Administrative Court), decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:
‘Is the condition imposed on students not residing in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg by Article 3(5)(b) of the Law of 24 July 2014, which does not take into account any other connecting factor, that is to say, the condition that they must be the children of workers who have been employed or have carried out their activity in Luxembourg for a period of at least five years in the course of a reference period of seven years at the time at which the application for financial aid is made, necessary in order to attain the objective put forward by the Luxembourg legislature, namely that of bringing about an increase in the proportion of persons with a higher education degree?’

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Luxembourg authorities"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The Court of Justice"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "The Luxembourg authorities"->"Question for a preliminary ruling";
   "Question for a preliminary ruling"->"The Court of Justice";
   "The Luxembourg authorities"->"Stay the proceedings"[dir=none];
   "Question for a preliminary ruling"->"Is the condition imposed on students not residing in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg by Article 3(5)(b) of the Law of 24 July 2014, which does not take into account any other connecting factor, that is to say, the condition that they must be the children of workers who have been employed or have carried out their activity in Luxembourg for a period of at least five years in the course of a reference period of seven years at the time at which the application for financial aid is made, necessary in order to attain the objective put forward by the Luxembourg legislature, namely that of bringing about an increase in the proportion of persons with a higher education degree?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/19 (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

При тези обстоятелства Tribunal administratif (Административен съд) решава да спре производството и да отправи до Съда следния преюдициален въпрос:
„Необходимо ли е, за да се постигне обявената от люксембургския законодател цел да се насърчи увеличаването на дела на завършилите висше образование, предвиденото в член 3[, параграф] 5, буква b) от Закона от 24 юли 2014 г. условие за получаване от студентите, които не пребивават във Великото херцогство Люксембург, на финансова помощ от държавата за висше образование, а именно да са деца на наети лица или на лица, упражнявали дейността си в Люксембург за период от най-малко пет години в рамките на референтен период от седем години към датата на подаване на молбата за финансова помощ, като се изключва прилагането на какъвто и да било друг критерий за връзка?“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "люксембургския законодател"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Административен съд"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "люксембургския законодател"->"преюдициален въпрос";
  "преюдициален въпрос"->"Административен съд";
  "люксембургския законодател"->"спре производството"[dir=none];
  "преюдициален въпрос"->"Необходимо ли е, за да се постигне обявената от люксембургския законодател цел да се насърчи увеличаването на дела на завършилите висше образование, предвиденото в член 3[, параграф] 5, буква b) от Закона от 24 юли 2014 г. условие за получаване от студентите, които не пребивават във Великото херцогство Люксембург, на финансова помощ от държавата за висше образование, а именно да са деца на наети лица или на лица, упражнявали дейността си в Люксембург за период от най-малко пет години в рамките на референтен период от седем години към датата на подаване на молбата за финансова помощ, като се изключва прилагането на какъвто и да било друг критерий за връзка?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/20 (2019)
Language: Spanish

En tales circunstancias, el tribunal administratif (Tribunal de lo Contencioso-Administrativo) decidió suspender el procedimiento y plantear al Tribunal de Justicia la siguiente cuestión prejudicial:
«El requisito impuesto a los estudiantes que no residen en el Gran Ducado de Luxemburgo por el artículo 3, punto 5, letra b), de la Ley de 24 de julio de 2014, que no tiene en cuenta ningún otro criterio de conexión, y que consiste en que sean hijos de un trabajador que, en el momento de solicitarse la ayuda económica, lleve empleado o ejerciendo su actividad en Luxemburgo durante al menos 5 años en un período referencia de 7 años, ¿es necesario para alcanzar el objetivo establecido por el legislador luxemburgués, a saber, tratar de fomentar el incremento de la proporción de personas que posean un título de enseñanza superior?»

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The Luxembourg authorities doesn't appear in the Spanish text provided."[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tribunal de Justicia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The Luxembourg authorities doesn't appear in the Spanish text provided."->"la siguiente cuestión prejudicial";
  "la siguiente cuestión prejudicial"->"Tribunal de Justicia";
  "The Luxembourg authorities doesn't appear in the Spanish text provided."->"suspender el procedimiento"[dir=none];
  "la siguiente cuestión prejudicial"->"El requisito impuesto a los estudiantes que no residen en el Gran Ducado de Luxemburgo por el artículo 3, punto 5, letra b), de la Ley de 24 de julio de 2014, que no tiene en cuenta ningún otro criterio de conexión, y que consiste en que sean hijos de un trabajador que, en el momento de solicitarse la ayuda económica, lleve empleado o ejerciendo su actividad en Luxemburgo durante al menos 5 años en un período referencia de 7 años, ¿es necesario para alcanzar el objetivo establecido por el legislador luxemburgués, a saber, tratar de fomentar el incremento de la proporción de personas que posean un título de enseñanza superior?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/22 (2019)
Language: Danish

På denne baggrund har Tribunal administratif (forvaltningsdomstolen i Luxembourg) besluttet at udsætte sagen og forelægge Domstolen følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål:
»Er den betingelse, som pålægges studerende, der ikke er bosiddende i Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg, ved artikel 3[, stk.] 5[, litra] b), i […] lov af 24. juli 2014 […], nemlig at ansøgeren er barn af en arbejdstager eller selvstændig erhvervsdrivende, som har haft lønnet beskæftigelse eller har udøvet selvstændig erhvervsvirksomhed i Luxembourg i en periode på mindst fem år i løbet af en referenceperiode på syv år på det tidspunkt, hvor den studerende ansøger om økonomisk støtte, idet der ikke tages hensyn til andre tilknytningskriterier, nødvendig for at nå det af den luxembourgske lovgiver anførte mål, nemlig at søge at øge andelen af personer, der har afsluttet en videregående uddannelse?«

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "den luxembourgske lovgiver"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Domstolen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "den luxembourgske lovgiver"->"følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål";
  "følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål"->"Domstolen";
  "den luxembourgske lovgiver"->"udsætte sagen"[dir=none];
  "følgende præjudicielle spørgsmål"->"Er den betingelse, som pålægges studerende, der ikke er bosiddende i Storhertugdømmet Luxembourg, ved artikel 3[, stk.] 5[, litra] b), i […] lov af 24. juli 2014 […], nemlig at ansøgeren er barn af en arbejdstager eller selvstændig erhvervsdrivende, som har haft lønnet beskæftigelse eller har udøvet selvstændig erhvervsvirksomhed i Luxembourg i en periode på mindst fem år i løbet af en referenceperiode på syv år på det tidspunkt, hvor den studerende ansøger om økonomisk støtte, idet der ikke tages hensyn til andre tilknytningskriterier, nødvendig for at nå det af den luxembourgske lovgiver anførte mål, nemlig at søge at øge andelen af personer, der har afsluttet en videregående uddannelse?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/23 (2019)
Language: German

Unter diesen Umständen hat das Tribunal administratif (Verwaltungsgericht) beschlossen, das Verfahren auszusetzen und dem Gerichtshof folgende Frage zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen:
Ist die in Art. 3 Nr. 5 Buchst. b des Gesetzes vom 24. Juli 2014 für Studierende ohne Wohnsitz im Großherzogtum Luxemburg unter Ausschluss der Berücksichtigung jedes anderen Anknüpfungskriteriums aufgestellte Voraussetzung, dass sie das Kind eines Erwerbstätigen sein müssen, der zum Zeitpunkt der Beantragung der Beihilfe innerhalb eines Referenzzeitraums von sieben Jahren mindestens fünf Jahre lang in Luxemburg als Arbeitnehmer oder als Selbständiger tätig war, erforderlich, um das vom luxemburgischen Gesetzgeber angeführte Ziel zu erreichen, das darin besteht, eine Erhöhung des Anteils von Personen mit Studienabschluss anzustreben?

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The text does not include an equivalent phrase for"The Luxembourg authorities"."[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Gerichtshof"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "The text does not include an equivalent phrase for"The Luxembourg authorities"."->"folgende Frage zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen:";
  "folgende Frage zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen:"->"Gerichtshof";
  "The text does not include an equivalent phrase for"The Luxembourg authorities"."->"das Verfahren auszusetzen"[dir=none];
  "folgende Frage zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen:"->"Ist die in Art. 3 Nr. 5 Buchst. b des Gesetzes vom 24. Juli 2014 für Studierende ohne Wohnsitz im Großherzogtum Luxemburg unter Ausschluss der Berücksichtigung jedes anderen Anknüpfungskriteriums aufgestellte Voraussetzung, dass sie das Kind eines Erwerbstätigen sein müssen, der zum Zeitpunkt der Beantragung der Beihilfe innerhalb eines Referenzzeitraums von sieben Jahren mindestens fünf Jahre lang in Luxemburg als Arbeitnehmer oder als Selbständiger tätig war, erforderlich, um das vom luxemburgischen Gesetzgeber angeführte Ziel zu erreichen, das darin besteht, eine Erhöhung des Anteils von Personen mit Studienabschluss anzustreben?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/25 (2019)
Language: Greek

Υπό τις συνθήκες αυτές, το Tribunal administratif (πρωτοβάθμιο διοικητικό δικαστήριο) αποφάσισε να αναστείλει την ενώπιόν του διαδικασία και να υποβάλει στο Δικαστήριο το ακόλουθο προδικαστικό ερώτημα:
«Είναι αναγκαία, προκειμένου να επιτευχθεί ο σκοπός τον οποίον επιδιώκει ο νομοθέτης του Λουξεμβούργου, δηλαδή η προσπάθεια αύξησης του ποσοστού των προσώπων που είναι πτυχιούχοι ανώτατης και μεταλυκειακής εκπαίδευσης, η προϋπόθεση η οποία επιβάλλεται στους σπουδαστές που δεν διαμένουν στο Μεγάλο Δουκάτο του Λουξεμβούργου με το άρθρο 3, [παράγραφος] 5, [στοιχείο] b, του νόμου της 24ης Ιουλίου 2014, δηλαδή το να είναι οι ενδιαφερόμενοι τέκνα εργαζομένων που έχουν απασχοληθεί ή ασκήσει τη δραστηριότητά τους στο Λουξεμβούργο επί χρονικό διάστημα τουλάχιστον πέντε ετών εντός περιόδου αναφοράς επτά ετών κατά τον χρόνο υποβολής της αίτησης για χορήγηση οικονομικού βοηθήματος, αποκλειομένης της συνεκτιμήσεως κάθε άλλου κριτηρίου συνδέσεως;»

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "ο νομοθέτης του Λουξεμβούργου"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Το Δικαστήριο"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "ο νομοθέτης του Λουξεμβούργου"->"προδικαστικό ερώτημα";
  "προδικαστικό ερώτημα"->"Το Δικαστήριο";
  "ο νομοθέτης του Λουξεμβούργου"->"αναστείλει την ενώπιόν του διαδικασία"[dir=none];
  "προδικαστικό ερώτημα"->"Είναι αναγκαία, προκειμένου να επιτευχθεί ο σκοπός τον οποίον επιδιώκει ο νομοθέτης του Λουξεμβούργου, δηλαδή η προσπάθεια αύξησης του ποσοστού των προσώπων που είναι πτυχιούχοι ανώτατης και μεταλυκειακής εκπαίδευσης, η προϋπόθεση η οποία επιβάλλεται στους σπουδαστές που δεν διαμένουν στο Μεγάλο Δουκάτο του Λουξεμβούργου με το άρθρο 3, [παράγραφος] 5, [στοιχείο] b, του νόμου της 24ης Ιουλίου 2014, δηλαδή το να είναι οι ενδιαφερόμενοι τέκνα εργαζομένων που έχουν απασχοληθεί ή ασκήσει τη δραστηριότητά τους στο Λουξεμβούργο επί χρονικό διάστημα τουλάχιστον πέντε ετών εντός περιόδου αναφοράς επτά ετών κατά τον χρόνο υποβολής της αίτησης για χορήγηση οικονομικού βοηθήματος, αποκλειομένης της συνεκτιμήσεως κάθε άλλου κριτηρίου συνδέσεως;"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/26 (2019)
Language: French

Dans ces conditions, le Tribunal administratif a décidé de surseoir à statuer et de poser à la Cour la question préjudicielle suivante :
« La condition imposée aux étudiants ne résidant pas au Grand-Duché de Luxembourg par l’article 3[, paragraphe] 5[, sous] b), de la loi du 24 juillet 2014, à l’exclusion de la prise en compte de tout autre critère de rattachement, à savoir d’être enfants de travailleurs ayant été employés ou ayant exercé leur activité au Luxembourg pendant une durée d’au moins cinq ans au cours d’une période de référence de sept ans à la date de la demande de l’aide financière, est-elle nécessaire afin d’atteindre l’objectif avancé par le législateur luxembourgeois, à savoir chercher à encourager l’augmentation de la proportion des personnes titulaires d’un diplôme d’enseignement supérieur ? »

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "le législateur luxembourgeois"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tribunal administratif"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "le législateur luxembourgeois"->"la question préjudicielle suivante";
  "la question préjudicielle suivante"->"Tribunal administratif";
  "le législateur luxembourgeois"->"surseoir à statuer"[dir=none];
  "la question préjudicielle suivante"->"La condition imposée aux étudiants ne résidant pas au Grand-Duché de Luxembourg par l’article 3[, paragraphe] 5[, sous] b), de la loi du 24 juillet 2014, à l’exclusion de la prise en compte de tout autre critère de rattachement, à savoir d’être enfants de travailleurs ayant été employés ou ayant exercé leur activité au Luxembourg pendant une durée d’au moins cinq ans au cours d’une période de référence de sept ans à la date de la demande de l’aide financière, est-elle nécessaire afin d’atteindre l’objectif avancé par le législateur luxembourgeois, à savoir chercher à encourager l’augmentation de la proportion des personnes titulaires d’un diplôme d’enseignement supérieur ?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/27 (2019)
Language: Croatian

U tim je okolnostima Tribunal administratif (Upravni sud, Luksemburg) odlučio prekinuti postupak i uputiti Sudu sljedeće prethodno pitanje:
„Je li uvjet propisan za studente koji nemaju boravište u Velikom Vojvodstvu Luksemburgu člankom 3. stavkom 5. točkom (b) Zakona od 24. srpnja 2014., kojim se isključuje uzimanje u obzir ijedne druge poveznice, odnosno uvjet da moraju biti djeca radnika koji su bili zaposleni ili su obavljali svoju djelatnost u Luksemburgu u razdoblju od najmanje pet godina tijekom referentnog razdoblja od sedam godina na datum podnošenja zahtjeva za novčanu pomoć, nužan kako bi se ostvario cilj luksemburškog zakonodavca, a to je nastojati potaknuti povećanje udjela nositelja diplome o visokoškolskom obrazovanju?”

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "luksemburškog zakonodavca"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Upravni sud"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "luksemburškog zakonodavca"->"sljedeće prethodno pitanje";
  "sljedeće prethodno pitanje"->"Upravni sud";
  "luksemburškog zakonodavca"->"prekinuti postupak"[dir=none];
  "sljedeće prethodno pitanje"->"Je li uvjet propisan za studente koji nemaju boravište u Velikom Vojvodstvu Luksemburgu člankom 3. stavkom 5. točkom (b) Zakona od 24. srpnja 2014., kojim se isključuje uzimanje u obzir ijedne druge poveznice, odnosno uvjet da moraju biti djeca radnika koji su bili zaposleni ili su obavljali svoju djelatnost u Luksemburgu u razdoblju od najmanje pet godina tijekom referentnog razdoblja od sedam godina na datum podnošenja zahtjeva za novčanu pomoć, nužan kako bi se ostvario cilj luksemburškog zakonodavca, a to je nastojati potaknuti povećanje udjela nositelja diplome o visokoškolskom obrazovanju?"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019
Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Financial aid for higher education studies — Non-resident students — Condition connected with the period of their parents’ working time on national territory — Minimum period of five years — Reference period of seven years — Method of calculation of the reference period — Date of the application for financial aid — Indirect discrimination — Justification — Proportionality
Case C-410/28 (2019)
Language: Italian

In tali circostanze il Tribunal administratif (Tribunale amministrativo) ha deciso di sospendere il procedimento e di sottoporre alla Corte la seguente questione pregiudiziale:
«Se il requisito imposto agli studenti non residenti nel Granducato di Lussemburgo dall’articolo 3[, punto] 5[, lettera] b), della legge del 24 luglio 2014, ad esclusione di altri criteri di collegamento, ossia essere figli di lavoratori che siano stati occupati o abbiano esercitato attività lavorativa in Lussemburgo per almeno cinque anni nel corso di un periodo di riferimento di sette anni al momento della presentazione della domanda di sussidio economico sia necessario per il conseguimento dell’obiettivo indicato dal legislatore lussemburghese, ossia cercare di promuovere l’aumento della percentuale di persone titolari di un diploma di istruzione superiore».

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "il legislatore lussemburghese"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Tribunal administratif (Tribunale amministrativo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "il legislatore lussemburghese"->"La seguente questione pregiudiziale";
  "La seguente questione pregiudiziale"->"Tribunal administratif (Tribunale amministrativo)";
  "il legislatore lussemburghese"->"sospendere il procedimento"[dir=none];
  "La seguente questione pregiudiziale"->"Se il requisito imposto agli studenti non residenti nel Granducato di Lussemburgo dall’articolo 3[, punto] 5[, lettera] b), della legge del 24 luglio 2014, ad esclusione di altri criteri di collegamento, ossia essere figli di lavoratori che siano stati occupati o abbiano esercitato attività lavorativa in Lussemburgo per almeno cinque anni nel corso di un periodo di riferimento di sette anni al momento della presentazione della domanda di sussidio economico sia necessario per il conseguimento dell’obiettivo indicato dal legislatore lussemburghese, ossia cercare di promuovere l’aumento della percentuale di persone titolari di un diploma di istruzione superiore"[dir=none];
    
}