mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: English

The decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities on 18 February 1998. By letter of 17 March 1998, the applicant — the Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’ (‘the Committee’), an association which brings together the principal organisations of industry and commerce in Venice and which was formed following the initiation of the abovementioned formal investigation procedure in order to coordinate action intended to remedy the disadvantageous situation of traders located in Venice — submitted its comments and a report, accompanied by a study carried out by the Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (‘COSES’) (Consortium for Research and Training) dated March 1998 concerning the difficulties encountered by undertakings operating in the area of the lagoon as compared with those located on the mainland. On 18 May 1998, the City of Venice also submitted comments, accompanied by an earlier study carried out by COSES on the same subject, dated February 1998. In its observations, the City of Venice explained that municipal undertakings providing public services of general economic interest were also beneficiaries of the scheme. It requested the application of Article 86(2) EC in favour of those undertakings. All of those comments were forwarded to the Italian Republic.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "Italian authorities"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The City of Venice"[shape=doubleoctagon];

   "The City of Venice"->"Submitted comments 18/05/1998";
   "Submitted comments 18/05/1998"->"Italian authorities";
   "Submitted comments 18/05/1998"->"It requested the application of Article 86(2) EC in favour of those undertakings."[dir=none];
   "The Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’"->"Italian authorities"[label="Submit comments and  reports 03/17/1998"];
   "Italian authorities"->"the scheme for relief from social security contributions under consideration"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Bulgarian

Решението за започване на процедурата е публикувано в Официален вестник на Европейските общности от 18 февруари 1998 г. С писмо от 17 март 1998 г. жалбоподателят Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“ (по-нататък наричан „коми-тетът“ — сдружение, което обединява основните организации на промишлените и търговските оператори във Венеция и е учредено вследствие на започването на горепосочената официална процедура по разследване, за да координира действията, целящи да се сложи край на неблагоприятното положение на установените във Венеция оператори — представя становището си и изпраща доклад, като прилага проучване от март 1998 г., което е осъществено от Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSES, Консорциум за развойна и научноизследо- вателска дейност) и се отнася до затрудненията, които имат осъществяващите дейност на територията на лагуната предприятия, за разлика от тези, установени в континенталната част. На 18 май 1998 г. Община Венеция също представя становище, като прилага първоначално проучване от февруари 1998 г., което е осъществено от COSES по същия въпрос. В становището си общината подчертава, че кръгът на получателите включва общинските предприятия, натоварени с предоставянето на услуга от общ икономически интерес. Тя иска прилагане на член 86, параграф 2 ЕО в тяхна полза. Всички тези становища са изпратени на Италианската република.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Италианската република"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "жалбоподателят Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Община Венеция"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Община Венеция"->"представя становище 18/05/1998";
  "представя становище 18/05/1998"->"Италианската република";
  "представя становище 18/05/1998"->"Тя иска прилагане на член 86, параграф 2 ЕО в тяхна полза.."[dir=none];
  "жалбоподателят Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“"->"Италианската република"[label="представя становището си и изпраща доклад 03/17/1998"];
  "Италианската република"->"разглежданата схема за освобождаване от социалноосигурителни вноски"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Spanish

La decisión de incoar el procedimiento fue publicada en el Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas de 18 de febrero de 1998. El demandante, el Comitato «Venezia vuole vivere» (Comité «Venecia quiere vivir»; en lo sucesivo, «Comité»), asociación que agrupa a las principales organizaciones de empresas industriales y comerciales venecianas, creada tras la apertura de este procedimiento de investigación formal con objeto de coordinar las acciones destinadas a remediar la desventajosa situación de las empresas situadas en Venecia, presentó sus observaciones mediante un escrito de 17 de marzo de 1998, acompañado de un estudio efectuado por el Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSES — Consorcio para la investigación y la formación), fechado en marzo de 1998, sobre las dificultades a que se enfrentan las empresas que operan en el territorio de la laguna, comparadas con las situadas en tierra firme. El 18 de mayo de 1998, el Ayuntamiento de Venecia presentó también sus observaciones, acompañadas de un primer estudio efectuado por el COSES sobre el mismo tema, fechado en febrero de 1998. En sus observaciones, el Ayuntamiento puso de de relieve que entre los beneficiarios figuraban empresas municipales encargadas de la gestión de un servicio de interés económico general y solicitó que se les aplicase el artículo 86 CE, apartado 2. La Comisión remitió a la República Italiana todas estas observaciones.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la República Italiana"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "El demandante, el Comitato «Venezia vuole vivere»"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "el Ayuntamiento de Venecia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "el Ayuntamiento de Venecia"->"presentó sus observaciones 18/05/1998";
  "presentó sus observaciones 18/05/1998"->"la República Italiana";
  "presentó sus observaciones 18/05/1998"->"y solicitó que se les aplicase el artículo 86 CE, apartado 2.."[dir=none];
  "El demandante, el Comitato «Venezia vuole vivere»"->"la República Italiana"[label="presentó sus observaciones 03/17/1998"];
  "la República Italiana"->"el régimen de desgravación de las cotizaciones a la seguridad social examinado"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Czech

Rozhodnutí zahájit řízení bylo zveřejněno v Úředním věstníku Evropských společenství ze dne 18. února 1998. Dopisem ze dne 17. března 1998 předložil Comiato „Venezia vuole vivere“ (dále jen „výbor“), sdružení seskupující nejvýznamnější organizace průmyslových a obchodních subjektů v Benátkách, které vzniklo po zahájení formálního vyšetřovacího řízení uvedeného výše za účelem zkoordinovat činnosti potřebné k nápravě nevýhodné situace hospodářských subjektů usazených v Benátkách, svá vyjádření a předal zprávu doplněnou studií uskutečněnou Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSES, Konsorcium pro výzkum a vzdělávání) pocházející ze září 1998, která se týká obtíží, se kterými se setkaly podniky působící v oblasti laguny, ve vztahu k podnikům usazeným na pevnině. Dne 18. května 1998 předložilo město Benátky rovněž vyjádření doplněné o první studii uskutečněnou COSES týkající se téhož předmětu, která pochází z února 1998. V těchto vyjádřeních zdůraznilo, že mezi příjemce patřily i obecní podniky, které jsou pověřeny poskytováním služby obecného hospodářského zájmu. Město Benátky v jejich prospěch uplatnilo použití čl. 86 odst. 2 ES. Všechna tato vyjádření byla předána Italské republice.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Italské republice."[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comiato „Venezia vuole vivere“"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Město Benátky"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Město Benátky"->"svá vyjádření 18/05/1998";
  "svá vyjádření 18/05/1998"->"Italské republice.";
  "svá vyjádření 18/05/1998"->"Město Benátky v jejich prospěch uplatnilo použití čl. 86 odst. 2 ES.."[dir=none];
  "Comiato „Venezia vuole vivere“"->"Italské republice."[label="předložil svá vyjádření a předal zprávu 03/17/1998"];
  "Italské republice."->"posuzovaný režim úlev na příspěvcích na sociální zabezpečení"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Danish

Beslutningen om at indlede proceduren blev offentliggjort i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende af 18. februar 1998. Sagsøgeren, Comitato »Venezia vuole vivere« (herefter »komitéen«), der er en sammenslutning af de væsentligste industri- og handelsorganisationer i Venedig, og som blev etableret, efter at den ovennævnte formelle undersøgelsesprocedure var blevet indledt med henblik på at koordinere tiltag med det formål at afhjælpe den vanskelige situation for de erhvervsdrivende i Venedig, fremsatte bemærkninger ved skrivelse af 17. marts 1998 og fremsendte en rapport, der var ledsaget af en undersøgelse, som var foretaget af Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (konsortium for forskning og uddannelse, herefter »COSES«), der var dateret i marts 1998 og omhandlede vanskelighederne for de virksomheder, der er aktive på lagunens område, i forhold til dem, der er beliggende på fastlandet. Den 18. maj 1998 fremsatte Venedig kommune ligeledes bemærkninger, der var ledsaget af en første undersøgelse foretaget af COSES vedrørende samme emne, som var dateret februar 1998. I bemærkningerne fremhævede den, at der blandt støttemodtagerne bl.a. optrådte kommunale virksomheder, der har fået overdraget at udføre tjenesteydelser af almindelig økonomisk interesse. Kommunen påberåbte sig anvendelse af artikel 86, stk. 2, EF i deres favør. Alle disse bemærkninger blev fremsendt til Den Italienske Republik.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Den Italienske Republik"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comitato »Venezia vuole vivere«"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Venedig kommune"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Venedig kommune"->"fremsatte bemærkninger 18/05/1998";
  "fremsatte bemærkninger 18/05/1998"->"Den Italienske Republik";
  "fremsatte bemærkninger 18/05/1998"->"Kommunen påberåbte sig anvendelse af artikel 86, stk. 2, EF i deres favør.."[dir=none];
  "Comitato »Venezia vuole vivere«"->"Den Italienske Republik"[label="fremsatte bemærkninger og fremsendte en rapport 03/17/1998"];
  "Den Italienske Republik"->"den pågældende ordning for fritagelse for sociale bidrag"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: German

Die Entscheidung über die Verfahrenseröffnung wurde im Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften vom 18. Februar 1998 veröffentlicht. Mit Schreiben vom 17. März 1998 äußerte sich der Kläger Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“ (im Folgenden: Comitato), eine Vereinigung, in der die wichtigsten Organisationen industrieller und gewerblicher Marktteilnehmer von Venedig zusammengeschlossen sind und die im Anschluss an die Eröffnung des genannten förmlichen Prüfverfahrens gegründet wurde, um die Aktionen zur Behebung der nachteiligen Situation der in Venedig ansässigen Wirtschaftsteilnehmer zu koordinieren, und reichte einen Bericht ein, dem eine Untersuchung des Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSES, Konsortium für Forschung und Ausbildung) vom März 1998 beigefügt war, der die Schwierigkeiten betraf, denen die im Gebiet der Lagune tätigen Unternehmen im Verhältnis zu den auf dem Festland ansässigen Unternehmen begegneten. Mit Schreiben vom 18. Mai 1998 reichte auch die Stadt Venedig eine Stellungnahme ein, der eine erste Untersuchung des COSES vom Februar 1998 zum gleichen Thema beigefügt war. Die Stadt Venedig hob in ihrer Stellungnahme hervor, dass sich unter den Beihilfeempfängern städtische Unternehmen befänden, die mit der Erbringung einer Dienstleistung von allgemeinem wirtschaftlichem Interesse betraut seien. Zugunsten dieser Unternehmen berief sie sich auf Art. 86 Abs. 2 EG. Alle diese Stellungnahmen wurden der Italienischen Republik übermittelt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Italienischen Republik"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "der Kläger Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Die Stadt Venedig"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Die Stadt Venedig"->"reichte einen Bericht ein 18/05/1998";
  "reichte einen Bericht ein 18/05/1998"->"Italienischen Republik";
  "reichte einen Bericht ein 18/05/1998"->"Zugunsten dieser Unternehmen berief sie sich auf Art. 86 Abs. 2 EG.."[dir=none];
  "der Kläger Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“"->"Italienischen Republik"[label="reichte einen Bericht ein 03/17/1998"];
  "Italienischen Republik"->"die zu prüfende Regelung zur Befreiung von Sozialversicherungsbeiträgen"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Estonian

Otsus alustada menetlust avaldati 18. veebruaril 1998 Euroopa Ühenduste Teatajas. Hageja Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere” (edaspidi „komitee”) – ühendus, millesse kuuluvad Venezia tööstus- ja kaubandusettevõtjate peamised organisatsioonid ja mis loodi pärast eespool mainitud ametliku uurimismenetluse algatamist selleks, et koordineerida hagisid, mille eesmärk on Venezias tegutsevate ettevõtjate ebasoodsa olukorra parandamine – esitas 17. märtsi 1998. aasta kirjas oma märkused ja edastas aruande, millele oli lisatud Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSES, uurimis- ja koolitusühing) poolt läbi viidud uurimus, mis pärines märtsist 1998 ja käsitles laguuni territooriumil tegutsevate ettevõtjate raskusi võrreldes mandril asuvate ettevõtjatega. 18. mail 1998 esitas ka Venezia kohalik omavalitsusüksus oma märkused, millele oli lisatud esimene COSES-i uurimus samal teemal, mis pärines veebruarist 1998. Oma märkustes rõhutas ta, et abi saajate hulgas on üldist majandushuvi esindava teenuse osutamiseks kohustatud kohaliku omavalitsusüksuse osalusega äriühingud. Ta tugines nende kasuks EÜ artikli 86 lõikele 2. Kõik need märkused edastati Itaalia Vabariigile.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Itaalia Vabariigile."[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Hageja Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere” (edaspidi „komitee”)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Venezia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Venezia"->"esitas oma märkused 18/05/1998";
  "esitas oma märkused 18/05/1998"->"Itaalia Vabariigile.";
  "esitas oma märkused 18/05/1998"->"Ta tugines nende kasuks EÜ artikli 86 lõikele 2.."[dir=none];
  "Hageja Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere” (edaspidi „komitee”)"->"Itaalia Vabariigile."[label="esitas oma märkused ja edastas aruande 03/17/1998"];
  "Itaalia Vabariigile."->"The given English phrase is not found in the provided Estonian legal text."[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Greek

Η απόφαση περί κινήσεως της διαδικασίας δημοσιεύθηκε στην Επίσημη Εφημερίδα των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων της 18ης Φεβρουαρίου 1998. Με επιστολή της 17ης Μαρτίου 1998, η προσφεύγουσα, η Comitato «Venezia vuole vivere» (στο εξής: επιτροπή), ένωση της οποίας μέλη είναι οι σημαντικότερες οργανώσεις βιομηχανικών και εμπορικών φορέων της Βενετίας και η οποία συστάθηκε μετά την κίνηση της προαναφερθείσας επίσημης διαδικασίας έρευνας, με σκοπό να συντονίσει τις ενέργειες για την αντιμετώπιση της δυσμενούς για τους φορείς της Βενετίας καταστάσεως, υπέβαλε τις παρατηρήσεις της και διαβίβασε έκθεση συνοδευόμενη από μία μελέτη, με ημερομηνία Μάρτιος του 1998, που συνέταξε ο Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSES, όμιλος για την έρευνα και την κατάρτιση), σχετικά με τις δυσχέρειες που αντιμετωπίζουν οι επιχειρήσεις που λειτουργούν στη λιμνοθάλασσα της Βενετίας σε σύγκριση με τις επιχειρήσεις που λειτουργούν στην ηπειρωτική χώρα. Στις 18 Μαΐου 1998, ο Δήμος Βενετίας υπέβαλε, επίσης, παρατηρήσεις, συνοδευόμενες από μια πρώτη μελέτη, με ημερομηνία Φεβρουάριος του 1998, που πραγματοποίησε ο COSES για το ίδιο θέμα. Με τις παρατηρήσεις του, ο Δήμος Βενετίας υπογράμμισε ότι, μεταξύ των δικαιούχων, περιλαμβάνονταν οι δημοτικές επιχειρήσεις στις οποίες έχει ανατεθεί η παροχή δημοσίων υπηρεσιών γενικού οικονομικού συμφέροντος. Υπέρ των επιχειρήσεων αυτών, επικαλέστηκε την εφαρμογή του άρθρου 86, παράγραφος 2, ΕΚ. Όλες οι ανωτέρω παρατηρήσεις διαβιβάστηκαν στην Ιταλική Δημοκρατία.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Ιταλική Δημοκρατία"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "η Comitato «Venezia vuole vivere»"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ο Δήμος Βενετίας"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "ο Δήμος Βενετίας"->"υπέβαλε τις παρατηρήσεις της 18/05/1998";
  "υπέβαλε τις παρατηρήσεις της 18/05/1998"->"Ιταλική Δημοκρατία";
  "υπέβαλε τις παρατηρήσεις της 18/05/1998"->"Υπέρ των επιχειρήσεων αυτών, επικαλέστηκε την εφαρμογή του άρθρου 86, παράγραφος 2, ΕΚ.."[dir=none];
  "η Comitato «Venezia vuole vivere»"->"Ιταλική Δημοκρατία"[label="υπέβαλε τις παρατηρήσεις της και διαβίβασε έκθεση 03/17/1998"];
  "Ιταλική Δημοκρατία"->"το υπό εξέταση καθεστώς απαλλαγής από τις εισφορές κοινωνικής ασφάλισης"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: French

La décision d’ouvrir la procédure a été publiée au Journal officiel des Communautés européennes du 18 février 1998. Par lettre du 17 mars 1998, le requérant, le Comitato « Venezia vuole vivere » (ci-après le « comité »), une association qui regroupe les principales organisations d’opérateurs industriels et commerciaux de Venise et qui a été constituée à la suite de l’ouverture de la procédure formelle d’examen susvisée afin de coordonner les actions visant à remédier à la situation désavantageuse des opérateurs implantés à Venise, a présenté ses observations et a transmis un rapport, accompagné d’une étude réalisée par le Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSES, consortium pour la recherche et la formation, datée du mois de mars 1998 et portant sur les difficultés rencontrées par les entreprises opérant sur le territoire de la lagune, par rapport à celles implantées sur la terre ferme. Le 18 mai 1998, la municipalité de Venise a également présenté des observations, accompagnées d’une première étude effectuée par le COSES sur le même sujet, datée du mois de février 1998. Dans ses observations, elle a souligné que parmi les bénéficiaires figuraient les entreprises municipales chargées de la prestation d’un service d’intérêt économique général. Elle invoquait en leur faveur l’application de l’article 86, paragraphe 2, CE. L’ensemble de ces observations a été transmis à la République italienne.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la République italienne"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "le Comitato « Venezia vuole vivere »"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "la municipalité de Venise"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "la municipalité de Venise"->"a présenté ses observations 18/05/1998";
  "a présenté ses observations 18/05/1998"->"la République italienne";
  "a présenté ses observations 18/05/1998"->"Elle invoquait en leur faveur l’application de l’article 86, paragraphe 2, CE.."[dir=none];
  "le Comitato « Venezia vuole vivere »"->"la République italienne"[label="a présenté ses observations et a transmis un rapport 03/17/1998"];
  "la République italienne"->"le régime d'allègement des charges sociales à l'étude"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Italian

La decisione di avviare il procedimento è stata pubblicata sulla Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europee del 18 febbraio 1998. Il comitato «Venezia vuole vivere» (in prosieguo: il «comitato»), ricorrente, un’associazione che raggruppa le principali organizzazioni di operatori industriali e commerciali di Venezia e che è stato costituito a seguito dell’avvio del summenzionato procedimento d’indagine formale, per coordinare le azioni dirette a rimediare alla situazione svantaggiosa degli operatori stabiliti a Venezia, ha presentato le sue osservazioni con lettera del 17 marzo 1998 e ha fornito una memoria, corredata di uno studio effettuato dal COSES (Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione), datato marzo 1998, concernente le difficoltà incontrate dalle imprese operanti nella laguna rispetto alle imprese situate sulla terraferma. Il 18 maggio 1998 anche il Comune di Venezia ha presentato una serie di osservazioni, corredate di un primo studio elaborato dal COSES sul medesimo argomento, datato febbraio 1998. Nelle sue osservazioni, il citato Comune ha sottolineato che, tra i beneficiari, vi erano anche le imprese municipalizzate, incaricate della prestazione di un servizio pubblico di interesse generale. Il comune invocava a loro favore l’applicazione dell’art. 86, n. 2, CE. Tutte queste osservazioni sono state inviate alla Repubblica italiana.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Repubblica italiana"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Il comitato «Venezia vuole vivere»"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "il Comune di Venezia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "il Comune di Venezia"->"ha presentato le sue osservazioni 18/05/1998";
  "ha presentato le sue osservazioni 18/05/1998"->"Repubblica italiana";
  "ha presentato le sue osservazioni 18/05/1998"->"Il comune invocava a loro favore l’applicazione dell’art. 86, n. 2, CE.."[dir=none];
  "Il comitato «Venezia vuole vivere»"->"Repubblica italiana"[label="ha presentato le sue osservazioni 03/17/1998"];
  "Repubblica italiana"->"il regime di sgravi contributivi in esame"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Latvian

Lēmums par procedūras uzsākšanu tika publicēts 1998. gada 18. februāraEiropas Kopienu Oficiālajā Vēstnesī. Ar 1998. gada 17. marta vēstuli prasītājs Comitato “Venezia vuole vivere” (turpmāk tekstā — “komiteja”), asociācija, kas apvieno Venēcijas galvenās ražošanas un komerciālās organizācijas un kas tika izveidota pēc iepriekš minētās formālās izmeklēšanas procedūras uzsākšanas, lai koordinētu darbības ar mērķi novērst Venēcijā reģistrēto tirgus dalībnieku nelabvēlīgo situāciju, iesniedza savus apsvērumus un nosūtīja ziņojumu, ko papildināja Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSES; Pētniecības un mācību konsorcijs) pētījums, kas datēts ar 1998. gada martu un attiecās uz grūtībām, ar kurām saskaras uzņēmumi, kas darbojas lagūnas teritorijā, salīdzinājumā ar uzņēmumiem, kas darbojas uz cietzemes. 1998. gada 18. maijā Venēcijas pašvaldība arī iesniedza savus apsvērumus, ko papildināja COSES veikts pētījums par šo pašu tēmu, kas datēts ar 1998. gada februāri. Savos apsvērumos tā uzsvēra, ka arī pašvaldības uzņēmumi, kas sniedza vispārējas ekonomiskās intereses pakalpojumus, bija atbalsta saņēmēji. Tā lūdza tiem piemērot EKL 86. panta 2. punktu. Visi šie apsvērumi tika nosūtīti Itālijas Republikai.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Itālijas Republika"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comitato “Venezia vuole vivere”"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Venēcijas pašvaldība"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Venēcijas pašvaldība"->"iesniedza savus apsvērumus 18/05/1998";
  "iesniedza savus apsvērumus 18/05/1998"->"Itālijas Republika";
  "iesniedza savus apsvērumus 18/05/1998"->"Tā lūdza tiem piemērot EKL 86. panta 2. punktu.."[dir=none];
  "Comitato “Venezia vuole vivere”"->"Itālijas Republika"[label="iesniedza savus apsvērumus un nosūtīja ziņojumu 03/17/1998"];
  "Itālijas Republika"->"aplūkojamā sociālā nodrošinājuma iemaksu atvieglojumu shēma"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Lithuanian

Sprendimas pradėti procedūrą buvo paskelbtas 1998 m. vasario 18 d.Europos Bendrijų oficialiajame leidinyje. 1998 m. kovo 17 d. laišku ieškovas, Comitato„Venezia vuole vivere“ (toliau – komitetas), pagrindines Venecijos pramonės ir prekybos organizacijas jungianti asociacija, įsteigta pradėjus minėtą formalią tyrimo procedūrą, siekiant koordinuoti veiksmus gerinant Venecijoje įsteigtų ūkio subjektų nepalankią padėtį, pateikė savo pastabas ir ataskaitą kartu su 1998 m. kovo mėn. Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSES – Mokslo ir tyrimų konsorciumas) atlikta studija dėl sunkumų, su kuriais susiduria lagūnoje veikiančios įmonės, palyginti su įsteigtomis sausumoje. 1998 m. gegužės 18 d. Venecijos savivaldybė taip pat pateikė pastabas kartu su pirmąja 1998 m. vasario mėn. COSES studija, nagrinėjančia tą patį klausimą. Savo pastabose ji teigė, kad tarp gavėjų yra bendros ekonominės svarbos paslaugas teikiančios savivaldybės įmonės. Ji nurodė, kad šių įmonių atžvilgiu turi būti taikoma EB 86 straipsnio 2 dalis. Visos šios pastabos buvo perduotos Italijos Respublikai.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Italijos Respublikai"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comitato„Venezia vuole vivere“"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Venecijos savivaldybė"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Venecijos savivaldybė"->"pateikė savo pastabas 18/05/1998";
  "pateikė savo pastabas 18/05/1998"->"Italijos Respublikai";
  "pateikė savo pastabas 18/05/1998"->"Ji nurodė, kad šių įmonių atžvilgiu turi būti taikoma EB 86 straipsnio 2 dalis.."[dir=none];
  "Comitato„Venezia vuole vivere“"->"Italijos Respublikai"[label="pateikė savo pastabas ir ataskaitą 03/17/1998"];
  "Italijos Respublikai"->"nagrinėjama atleidimo nuo socialinio draudimo įmokų schema"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Hungarian

Az eljárás megindításáról szóló határozatot 1998. február 18-án tették közzé az Európai Közösségek Hivatalos Lapjában. A Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere” – olyan egyesület, amely az ipar és a kereskedelem területén tevékenykedő gazdasági szereplők legfontosabb szervezeteit tömöríti Velencében, és amelyet a fent említett hivatalos vizsgálati eljárás megindítását követően hoztak létre abból a célból, hogy a Velence területén letelepedett gazdasági szereplők hátrányos helyzetének javítására irányuló cselekvéseket koordinálja (a továbbiakban: egyesület) – 1998. március 17-i levelében észrevételeket terjesztett elő, továbbá benyújtott egy jelentést, amelyhez a Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSES, kutatási és képzési konzorcium) által készített, 1998. márciusi keltezésű tanulmányt csatolt, amely arra vonatkozott, hogy a lagúna területén működő vállalkozásoknak a szárazföldön letelepedett vállalkozásokhoz képest milyen nehézségekkel kell szembenézniük. 1998. május 18-án Velence önkormányzata is észrevételeket terjesztett elő, amelyekhez csatolta a COSES által ugyanezen tárgyban készített első, 1998. februári keltezésű tanulmányt. Az észrevételekben hangsúlyozta, hogy a kedvezményezettek között önkormányzati tulajdonú vállalkozások is vannak, amelyeket általános gazdasági érdekű szolgáltatási kötelezettség terhel. E vállalkozások érdekében az önkormányzat az EK 86. cikk (2) bekezdésére hivatkozott. Az észrevételek mindegyikét továbbították az Olasz Köztársaságnak.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Olasz Köztársaság"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere”"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Velence önkormányzata"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Velence önkormányzata"->"észrevételeket terjesztett elő 18/05/1998";
  "észrevételeket terjesztett elő 18/05/1998"->"Olasz Köztársaság";
  "észrevételeket terjesztett elő 18/05/1998"->"Az EK 86. cikk (2) bekezdésére hivatkozott.."[dir=none];
  "Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere”"->"Olasz Köztársaság"[label="észrevételeket terjesztett elő, továbbá benyújtott egy jelentést 03/17/1998"];
  "Olasz Köztársaság"->"a szóban forgó társadalombiztosítási járulékok alóli mentesség rendszere"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Maltese

Id-deċiżjoni li tinfetaħ il-proċedura ġiet ippubblikata fil-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Komunitajiet Ewropej tat-18 ta’ Frar 1998. B’ittra tas-17 ta’ Marzu 1998, ir-rikorrent, il-Comitato “Venezia vuole vivere” (iktar ’il quddiem “il-Kumitat”), assoċjazzjoni li tiġbor fiha l-organizzazzjonijiet prinċipali ta’ operaturi industrijali u kummerċjali ta’ Venezia, u li ġie ffurmat wara l-ftuħ tal-proċedura formali ta’ eżami msemmija iktar ’il fuq sabiex jikkoordina l-azzjonijiet intiżi sabiex tiġi rrimedjata s-sitwazzjoni żvantaġġuża tal-operaturi stabbiliti f’Venezia, ippreżenta l-osservazzjonijiet tiegħu u ttrażmetta rapport, flimkien ma’ studju mwettaq mill- Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSES, konsorzju għar-riċerka u għall-formazzjoni) bid-data tax-xahar ta’ Marzu 1998 u li jirrigwarda d-diffikultajiet li ltaqgħu magħhom l-impriżi li joperaw fit-territorju tal-laguna, meta mqabbla ma’ dawk stabbiliti fuq l-art. Fit-18 ta’ Mejju 1998, il-muniċipalità ta’ Venezia ppreżentat ukoll xi osservazzjonijiet, flimkien ma’ studju inizjali li sar mill-COSES dwar l-istess suġġett, bid-data tax-xahar ta’ Frar 1998. Fl-osservazzjonijiet tagħha, hija enfasizzat li, fost il-benefiċjarji, kien hemm l-impriżi muniċipali, inkarigati mill-provvista ta’ servizz ta’ interess ekonomiku ġenerali. Hija invokat favur tagħhom l-applikazzjoni tal-Artikolu 86(2) KE. Dawn l-osservazzjonijiet kollha ġew trażmessi lir-Repubblika Taljana.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Repubblika Taljana."[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "il-Comitato “Venezia vuole vivere”"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "il-muniċipalità ta’ Venezia"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "il-muniċipalità ta’ Venezia"->"ippreżenta l-osservazzjonijiet tiegħu 18/05/1998";
  "ippreżenta l-osservazzjonijiet tiegħu 18/05/1998"->"Repubblika Taljana.";
  "ippreżenta l-osservazzjonijiet tiegħu 18/05/1998"->"Hija invokat favur tagħhom l-applikazzjoni tal-Artikolu 86(2) KE.."[dir=none];
  "il-Comitato “Venezia vuole vivere”"->"Repubblika Taljana."[label="ippreżenta l-osservazzjonijiet tiegħu u ttrażmetta rapport 03/17/1998"];
  "Repubblika Taljana."->"l-iskema għall-eżenzjoni mill-kontribuzzjonijiet tas-sigurtà soċjali taħt konsiderazzjoni"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Dutch

De beslissing om de procedure in te leiden is bekendgemaakt in het Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen van 18 februari 1998. Bij brief van 17 maart 1998 heeft verzoeker, het comitato „Venezia vuole vivere” (hierna: „comité”), een vereniging waarin de belangrijkste organisaties van industriële marktdeelnemers en handelaren uit Venetië zijn verenigd, en die naar aanleiding van het inleiden van bovengenoemde formele onderzoeksprocedure is opgericht teneinde de acties om het hoofd te bieden aan de ongunstige situatie van de in Venetië gevestigde marktdeelnemers te coördineren, zijn opmerkingen ingediend en een rapport overgelegd, vergezeld van een uit maart 1998 daterende studie door het Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSES, consortium voor onderzoek en studie) over de moeilijkheden die in de lagune actieve ondernemingen ondervinden ten opzichte van ondernemingen op het vasteland. Op 18 mei 1998 heeft ook de gemeente Venetië haar opmerkingen ingediend, vergezeld van een eerste, uit februari 1998 daterende, studie van het COSES over hetzelfde onderwerp. In haar opmerkingen beklemtoont zij dat zich onder de begunstigden gemeentebedrijven bevinden, belast met het verrichten van een dienst van algemeen economisch belang. Zij beroept zich ten behoeve van hen op toepassing van artikel 86, lid 2, EG. Al deze opmerkingen zijn aan de Italiaanse Republiek gezonden.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Italiaanse Republiek"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "verzoeker, het comitato „Venezia vuole vivere”"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de gemeente Venetië"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "de gemeente Venetië"->"zijn opmerkingen ingediend 18/05/1998";
  "zijn opmerkingen ingediend 18/05/1998"->"Italiaanse Republiek";
  "zijn opmerkingen ingediend 18/05/1998"->"Zij beroept zich ten behoeve van hen op toepassing van artikel 86, lid 2, EG.."[dir=none];
  "verzoeker, het comitato „Venezia vuole vivere”"->"Italiaanse Republiek"[label="zijn opmerkingen ingediend en een rapport overgelegd, 03/17/1998"];
  "Italiaanse Republiek"->"de onderzochte regeling voor vrijstelling van sociale lasten"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 2008.
Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out - Admissibility - Individual concern - Conditions concerning effect on trade between Member States and competition - Derogations under Article 87(3)(b) to (e) EC and Article 87(2)(b) EC - Categorisation as new aid or as existing aid - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, equal treatment and proportionality - Duty to state reasons.
Joined cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00.
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 (2008)
Language: Polish

Decyzja o wszczęciu postępowania została opublikowana w dzienniku urzędowym Wspólnot Europejskich w dniu 18 lutego 1998 r. W dniu 17 marca 1998 r. skarżący, komitet „Venezia vuole vivere” (zwany dalej „komitetem”), stowarzyszenie, które skupia największe organizacje podmiotów gospodarczych prowadzących w Wenecji działalność w dziedzinach przemysłu i handlu i które zostało założone w następstwie wszczęcia ww. formalnego postępowania wyjaśniającego, aby koordynować działania mające na celu zaradzenie niekorzystnej sytuacji weneckich podmiotów gospodarczych, przedstawił swe uwagi na piśmie i przekazał sprawozdanie, do którego załączone zostały wyniki przeprowadzonego przez Consorzio per la ricerca e la formazione (COSEC, konsorcjum badawczo-edukacyjne) w marcu 1998 r. badania w przedmiocie trudności, jakim muszą stawić czoła przedsiębiorstwa prowadzące działalność na obszarze laguny, w porównaniu z przedsiębiorstwami znajdującymi się na stałym lądzie. W dniu 18 maja 1998 r. przedstawiła swe uwagi również gmina Wenecja, dołączając do nich wyniki pierwszego dokonanego przez COSEC w lutym 1998 r. badania na ten sam temat. W uwagach tych gmina Wenecja podkreśliła, że wśród beneficjentów pomocy znajdują się między innymi przedsiębiorstwa komunalne, na których spoczywa obowiązek świadczenia usług w ogólnym interesie gospodarczym. Powołała się ona na zastosowanie w ich przypadku art. 86 ust. 2 WE. Wszystkie te uwagi zostały także przekazane Republice Włoskiej.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Republika Włoska"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Komitet"Venezia vuole vivere"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "gmina Wenecja"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "gmina Wenecja"->"przedstawił swe uwagi 18/05/1998";
  "przedstawił swe uwagi 18/05/1998"->"Republika Włoska";
  "przedstawił swe uwagi 18/05/1998"->"Powołała się ona na zastosowanie w ich przypadku art. 86 ust. 2 WE.."[dir=none];
  "Komitet"Venezia vuole vivere"->"Republika Włoska"[label="przedstawił swe uwagi na piśmie i przekazał sprawozdanie 03/17/1998"];
  "Republika Włoska"->"rozważany system zwolnień ze składek na ubezpieczenie społeczne"[label="Suspend 01/12/1997"];
}