mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v Akvilė Jarmuškienė.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Special scheme for small enterprises — Articles 282 to 292 — VAT exemption for small enterprises whose annual turnover is below the fixed threshold — Simultaneous supply of two items of immovable property in a single transaction — Annual turnover limit exceeded in view of the sale price of one of the two items of property — Obligation to pay tax on the total value of the transaction.
Case C-265/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

A Autoridade Tributária Central do Estado intentou uma ação relativa à Decisão da CLF de 9 de maio de 2016, alegando que A. Jarmuškienė, através da operação em causa, tinha efetuado uma única entrega de bens, dado que os bens em questão não podiam ser entregues separadamente, estavam intrinsecamente ligados e constituíam um todo de um ponto de vista económico.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):

digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "O tribunal de primeira instância" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Autoridade Tributária Central do Estado" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Autoridade Tributária Central do Estado"->"intentou uma ação relativa à Decisão da CLF de 9 de maio de 2016";
    "intentou uma ação relativa à Decisão da CLF de 9 de maio de 2016"->"O tribunal de primeira instância";
    "intentou uma ação relativa à Decisão da CLF de 9 de maio de 2016"->"A. Jarmuškienė, através da operação em causa, tinha efetuado uma única entrega de bens, dado que os bens em questão não podiam ser entregues separadamente, estavam intrinsecamente ligados e constituíam um todo de um ponto de vista económico." [dir=none];
    "O tribunal de primeira instância" -> "Autoridade Tributária Central do Estado" [label="Indeferido"];


}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v Akvilė Jarmuškienė.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Special scheme for small enterprises — Articles 282 to 292 — VAT exemption for small enterprises whose annual turnover is below the fixed threshold — Simultaneous supply of two items of immovable property in a single transaction — Annual turnover limit exceeded in view of the sale price of one of the two items of property — Obligation to pay tax on the total value of the transaction.
Case C-265/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Direcția națională a impozitelor a introdus o acțiune în justiție împotriva deciziei CLF din 9 mai 2016, susținând că doamna Jarmuškienė realizase, prin operațiunea în cauză, o singură livrare de bunuri, dat fiind că bunurile în discuție nu puteau fi livrate separat, erau legate în mod intrinsec între ele și constituiau un întreg din punct de vedere economic.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):

digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Instanța de prim grad de jurisdicție" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Direcția națională a impozitelor" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Direcția națională a impozitelor"->"a introdus o acțiune în justiție împotriva deciziei CLF din 9 mai 2016";
    "a introdus o acțiune în justiție împotriva deciziei CLF din 9 mai 2016"->"Instanța de prim grad de jurisdicție";
    "a introdus o acțiune în justiție împotriva deciziei CLF din 9 mai 2016"->"Doamna Jarmuškienė realizase, prin operațiunea în cauză, o singură livrare de bunuri, dat fiind că bunurile în discuție nu puteau fi livrate separat, erau legate în mod intrinsec între ele și constituiau un întreg din punct de vedere economic." [dir=none];
    "Instanța de prim grad de jurisdicție" -> "Direcția națională a impozitelor" [label="Respins"];


}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v Akvilė Jarmuškienė.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Special scheme for small enterprises — Articles 282 to 292 — VAT exemption for small enterprises whose annual turnover is below the fixed threshold — Simultaneous supply of two items of immovable property in a single transaction — Annual turnover limit exceeded in view of the sale price of one of the two items of property — Obligation to pay tax on the total value of the transaction.
Case C-265/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Štátna daňová inšpekcia podala proti rozhodnutiu KDS z 9. mája 2016 žalobu, pričom uviedla, že pani Jarmuškienėová spornou transakciou uskutočnila jedno dodanie tovaru, keďže veci v uvedenom prípade nemohli byť dodané oddelene, boli navzájom prepojené a z ekonomického hľadiska predstavovali jeden celok.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):

digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Prvostupňový súd" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Štátna daňová inšpekcia" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Štátna daňová inšpekcia"->"podala proti rozhodnutiu KDS z 9. mája 2016 žalobu";
    "podala proti rozhodnutiu KDS z 9. mája 2016 žalobu"->"Prvostupňový súd";
    "podala proti rozhodnutiu KDS z 9. mája 2016 žalobu"->"Pani Jarmuškienėová uskutočnila jedno dodanie tovaru, boli navzájom prepojené a z ekonomického hľadiska predstavovali jeden celok." [dir=none];
    "Prvostupňový súd" -> "Štátna daňová inšpekcia" [label="Prepustené"];


}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v Akvilė Jarmuškienė.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Special scheme for small enterprises — Articles 282 to 292 — VAT exemption for small enterprises whose annual turnover is below the fixed threshold — Simultaneous supply of two items of immovable property in a single transaction — Annual turnover limit exceeded in view of the sale price of one of the two items of property — Obligation to pay tax on the total value of the transaction.
Case C-265/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Nacionalni davčni inšpektorat je zoper odločbo KDS z dne 9. maja 2016 vložil tožbo pred sodiščem in zatrjeval, da je A. Jarmuškienė z zadevno transakcijo izvedla eno samo dobavo blaga, ker zadevno blago ni moglo biti dobavljeno ločeno, saj je neločljivo povezano in z ekonomskega vidika pomeni celoto.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):

digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Prvostopenjsko sodišče" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Nacionalni davčni inšpektorat" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Nacionalni davčni inšpektorat"->"je zoper odločbo KDS z dne 9. maja 2016 vložil tožbo pred sodiščem";
    "je zoper odločbo KDS z dne 9. maja 2016 vložil tožbo pred sodiščem"->"Prvostopenjsko sodišče";
    "je zoper odločbo KDS z dne 9. maja 2016 vložil tožbo pred sodiščem"->"A. Jarmuškienė z zadevno transakcijo izvedla eno samo dobavo blaga, ker zadevno blago ni moglo biti dobavljeno ločeno, saj je neločljivo povezano in z ekonomskega vidika pomeni celoto." [dir=none];
    "Prvostopenjsko sodišče" -> "Nacionalni davčni inšpektorat" [label="Zavrnjeno"];


}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v Akvilė Jarmuškienė.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Special scheme for small enterprises — Articles 282 to 292 — VAT exemption for small enterprises whose annual turnover is below the fixed threshold — Simultaneous supply of two items of immovable property in a single transaction — Annual turnover limit exceeded in view of the sale price of one of the two items of property — Obligation to pay tax on the total value of the transaction.
Case C-265/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Valtakunnallinen veroviranomainen nosti veroriitalautakunnan 9.5.2016 antamasta päätöksestä tuomioistuimessa kanteen, jossa se vetosi siihen, että Jarmuškienė oli tehnyt kyseessä olevalla liiketoimella vain yhden omaisuuserien luovutuksen, koska kyseessä olleita omaisuuseriä ei ollut mahdollista luovuttaa erikseen, ne liittyivät erottamattomasti toisiinsa ja muodostivat taloudellisen kokonaisuuden.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):

digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Ensimmäisen oikeusasteen tuomioistuin" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Valtakunnallinen veroviranomainen" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Valtakunnallinen veroviranomainen"->"Nosti veroriitalautakunnan 9.5.2016 antamasta päätöksestä tuomioistuimessa kanteen";
    "Nosti veroriitalautakunnan 9.5.2016 antamasta päätöksestä tuomioistuimessa kanteen"->"Ensimmäisen oikeusasteen tuomioistuin";
    "Nosti veroriitalautakunnan 9.5.2016 antamasta päätöksestä tuomioistuimessa kanteen"->"Jarmuškienė oli tehnyt kyseessä olevalla liiketoimella vain yhden omaisuuserien luovutuksen, koska kyseessä olleita omaisuuseriä ei ollut mahdollista luovuttaa erikseen, ne liittyivät erottamattomasti toisiinsa ja muodostivat taloudellisen kokonaisuuden." [dir=none];
    "Ensimmäisen oikeusasteen tuomioistuin" -> "Valtakunnallinen veroviranomainen" [label="Vapautettu"];


}
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.
Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v Akvilė Jarmuškienė.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Special scheme for small enterprises — Articles 282 to 292 — VAT exemption for small enterprises whose annual turnover is below the fixed threshold — Simultaneous supply of two items of immovable property in a single transaction — Annual turnover limit exceeded in view of the sale price of one of the two items of property — Obligation to pay tax on the total value of the transaction.
Case C-265/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Nationella skatteinspektionen överklagade CLF:s beslut av den 9 maj 2016 och gjorde gällande att Akvilė Jarmuškienė genom den aktuella transaktionen hade genomfört en enda leverans av varor, eftersom de ifrågavarande varorna inte kunde levereras separat, var oupplösligt förbundna med varandra och utgjorde en helhet från ekonomisk synpunkt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):

digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Domstol i första instans" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "Nationella skatteinspektionen" [shape=doubleoctagon];

    "Nationella skatteinspektionen"->"Nationella skatteinspektionen överklagade CLF:s beslut av den 9 maj 2016";
    "Nationella skatteinspektionen överklagade CLF:s beslut av den 9 maj 2016"->"Domstol i första instans";
    "Nationella skatteinspektionen överklagade CLF:s beslut av den 9 maj 2016"->"Akvilė Jarmuškienė genom den aktuella transaktionen hade genomfört en enda leverans av varor, eftersom de ifrågavarande varorna inte kunde levereras separat, var oupplösligt förbundna med varandra och utgjorde en helhet från ekonomisk synpunkt." [dir=none];
    "Domstol i första instans" -> "Nationella skatteinspektionen" [label="Avslås"];

}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: English

On 16 January 2017, P. M., N. G.d.M. and P. V.d.S., the applicants in the main proceedings, brought an action for annulment before the referring court, the Grondwettelijk Hof (Constitutional Court, Belgium), against the provisions of the Law on public contracts, which excludes certain legal services and certain arbitration and conciliation services from the scope of application of that law.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Constitutional Court, Belgium)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"Brought an action for annulment";
    "P. V.d.S"->"Brought an action for annulment";
    "N. G.d.M"->"Brought an action for annulment";
    "Brought an action for annulment"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Constitutional Court, Belgium)";
    "Brought an action for annulment"->"The provisions of the Law on public contracts, which excludes certain legal services and certain arbitration and conciliation services from the scope of application of that law." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 16 януари 2017 г. жалбоподателите в главното производство P. M., N. G.d.M. и P. V.d.S, които са адвокати и юристи, предявяват искане до Grondwetelijk Hof (Конституционен съд, Белгия) за отмяна на разпоредбите от Закона за обществените поръчки, които изключват от приложното му поле някои правни, арбитражни и помирителни услуги.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Конституционен съд, Белгия)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"предявяват искане за отмяна";
    "P. V.d.S"->"предявяват искане за отмяна";
    "N. G.d.M"->"предявяват искане за отмяна";
    "предявяват искане за отмяна"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Конституционен съд, Белгия)";
    "предявяват искане за отмяна"->"Разпоредбите от Закона за обществените поръчки, които изключват от приложното му поле някои правни, арбитражни и помирителни услуги." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 16 de enero de 2017, P. M., N. G.d.M. y P. V.d.S., partes demandantes en el litigio principal, abogados y juristas de formación, interpusieron ante el órgano jurisdiccional remitente, el Grondwettelijk Hof (Tribunal Constitucional, Bélgica), un recurso de anulación contra las disposiciones de la Ley de contratos públicos, que excluyen determinados servicios jurídicos y determinados servicios de arbitraje y conciliación del ámbito de aplicación de la citada Ley.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Tribunal Constitucional, Bélgica)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"Interpusieron ante el órgano jurisdiccional remitente, un recurso de anulación";
    "P. V.d.S"->"Interpusieron ante el órgano jurisdiccional remitente, un recurso de anulación";
    "N. G.d.M"->"Interpusieron ante el órgano jurisdiccional remitente, un recurso de anulación";
    "Interpusieron ante el órgano jurisdiccional remitente, un recurso de anulación"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Tribunal Constitucional, Bélgica)";
    "Interpusieron ante el órgano jurisdiccional remitente, un recurso de anulación"->"Las disposiciones de la Ley de contratos públicos, que excluyen determinados servicios jurídicos y determinados servicios de arbitraje y conciliación del ámbito de aplicación de la citada Ley." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dne 16. ledna 2017 P. M., N. G.d.M. a P. V.d.S., žalobci v původním řízení, advokáti a osoby s ukončeným právním vzděláním, podali u předkládajícího soudu Grondwettelijk Hof (Ústavní soud, Belgie) žalobu na neplatnost proti ustanovením zákona o veřejných zakázkách, která vylučují určité právní služby, jakož i některé rozhodčí a smírčí služby z působnosti uvedeného zákona.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Ústavní soud, Belgie)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"podali žalobu na neplatnost";
    "P. V.d.S"->"podali žalobu na neplatnost";
    "N. G.d.M"->"podali žalobu na neplatnost";
    "podali žalobu na neplatnost"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Ústavní soud, Belgie)";
    "podali žalobu na neplatnost"->"Ustanovení zákona o veřejných zakázkách, která vylučují určité právní služby, jakož i některé rozhodčí a smírčí služby z působnosti uvedeného zákona." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den 16. januar 2017 indgav sagsøgerne i hovedsagen, P. M., N. G.d.M. og P. V.d.S., som er uddannet advokater og jurister, et søgsmål til den forelæggende ret, Grondwettelijk Hof (forfatningsdomstol, Belgien), med påstand om annullation af bestemmelserne i lov om offentlige kontrakter, som udelukker visse juridiske tjenesteydelser og visse voldgifts- og mæglingstjenesteydelser fra lovens anvendelsesområde.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Forfatningsdomstol, Belgien)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"med påstand om annullation";
    "P. V.d.S"->"med påstand om annullation";
    "N. G.d.M"->"med påstand om annullation";
    "med påstand om annullation"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Forfatningsdomstol, Belgien)";
    "med påstand om annullation"->"Bestemmelserne i lov om offentlige kontrakter, som udelukker visse juridiske tjenesteydelser og visse voldgifts- og mæglingstjenesteydelser fra lovens anvendelsesområde." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: German

Am 16. Januar 2017 erhoben die Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens, die ausgebildeten Juristen und Rechtsanwälte P. M., N. G.d.M. und P. V.d.S., Nichtigkeitsklage beim vorlegenden Gericht, dem Grondwettelijk Hof (Verfassungsgerichtshof, Belgien), gegen jene Bestimmungen des Gesetzes über die öffentliche Auftragsvergabe, die bestimmte Rechtsdienstleistungen sowie bestimmte Schiedsgerichts- und Schlichtungsdienstleistungen von seinem Anwendungsbereich ausschließen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Verfassungsgerichtshof, Belgien)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"erhoben die Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens, Nichtigkeitsklage";
    "P. V.d.S"->"erhoben die Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens, Nichtigkeitsklage";
    "N. G.d.M"->"erhoben die Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens, Nichtigkeitsklage";
    "erhoben die Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens, Nichtigkeitsklage"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Verfassungsgerichtshof, Belgien)";
    "erhoben die Kläger des Ausgangsverfahrens, Nichtigkeitsklage"->"jene Bestimmungen des Gesetzes über die öffentliche Auftragsvergabe, die bestimmte Rechtsdienstleistungen sowie bestimmte Schiedsgerichts- und Schlichtungsdienstleistungen von seinem Anwendungsbereich ausschließen." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Põhikohtuasja kaebajad P. M., N. G. d. M. ja P. V. d. S., kes on hariduselt juristid ja advokaadid, esitasid 16. jaanuaril 2017 eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohtule Grondwettelijk Hofi (konstitutsioonikohus, Belgia) kaebuse, milles palusid tühistada need riigihankeseaduse sätted, millega on teatud õigusteenused ja teatud vahekohtu- ja lepitamisteenused jäetud välja selle seaduse kohaldamisalast.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Konstitutsioonikohus, Belgia)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"palusid tühistada";
    "P. V.d.S"->"palusid tühistada";
    "N. G.d.M"->"palusid tühistada";
    "palusid tühistada"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Konstitutsioonikohus, Belgia)";
    "palusid tühistada"->"Need riigihankeseaduse sätted, millega on teatud õigusteenused ja teatud vahekohtu- ja lepitamisteenused jäetud välja selle seaduse kohaldamisalast." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 16 Ιανουαρίου 2017 οι P. M., N. G.d.M. και P. V.d.S., προσφεύγοντες της κύριας δίκης, δικηγόροι και νομικοί, άσκησαν προσφυγή ενώπιον του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου, ήτοι του Grondwettelijk Hof (Συνταγματικού Δικαστηρίου, Βέλγιο), ζητώντας την ακύρωση των διατάξεων του νόμου περί δημοσίων συμβάσεων οι οποίες εξαιρούν ορισμένες νομικές υπηρεσίες, καθώς και ορισμένες υπηρεσίες διαιτησίας και συμβιβασμού, από το πεδίο εφαρμογής του εν λόγω νόμου.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Συνταγματικού Δικαστηρίου, Βέλγιο)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"Άσκησαν προσφυγή ενώπιον του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου";
    "P. V.d.S"->"Άσκησαν προσφυγή ενώπιον του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου";
    "N. G.d.M"->"Άσκησαν προσφυγή ενώπιον του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου";
    "Άσκησαν προσφυγή ενώπιον του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Συνταγματικού Δικαστηρίου, Βέλγιο)";
    "Άσκησαν προσφυγή ενώπιον του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου"->"των διατάξεων του νόμου περί δημοσίων συμβάσεων οι οποίες εξαιρούν ορισμένες νομικές υπηρεσίες, καθώς και ορισμένες υπηρεσίες διαιτησίας και συμβιβασμού, από το πεδίο εφαρμογής του εν λόγω νόμου." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: French

Le 16 janvier 2017, P. M., N. G.d.M. et P. V.d.S., parties requérantes au principal, avocats et juristes de formation, ont saisi la juridiction de renvoi, le Grondwettelijk Hof (Cour constitutionnelle, Belgique), d’un recours en annulation visant les dispositions de la loi relative aux marchés publics, qui excluent certains services juridiques, ainsi que certains services d’arbitrage et de conciliation, du champ d’application de ladite loi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Cour constitutionnelle, Belgique)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"ont saisi la juridiction de renvoi, d’un recours en annulation";
    "P. V.d.S"->"ont saisi la juridiction de renvoi, d’un recours en annulation";
    "N. G.d.M"->"ont saisi la juridiction de renvoi, d’un recours en annulation";
    "ont saisi la juridiction de renvoi, d’un recours en annulation"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Cour constitutionnelle, Belgique)";
    "ont saisi la juridiction de renvoi, d’un recours en annulation"->"les dispositions de la loi relative aux marchés publics, qui excluent certains services juridiques, ainsi que certains services d’arbitrage et de conciliation, du champ d’application de ladite loi." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

P. M., N. G.d.M. i P. V.d.S., tužitelji iz glavnog postupka, odvjetnici i pravnici, 16. siječnja 2017. pokrenuli su pred sudom koji je uputio zahtjev, Grodwettelijk Hofom (Ustavni sud, Belgija), postupak za poništenje odredaba Zakona o javnoj nabavi kojima se određene pravne usluge, kao i određene usluge arbitraže i mirenja, isključuju iz područja primjene navedenog zakona.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Ustavni sud, Belgija)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"pokrenuli su postupak za poništenje";
    "P. V.d.S"->"pokrenuli su postupak za poništenje";
    "N. G.d.M"->"pokrenuli su postupak za poništenje";
    "pokrenuli su postupak za poništenje"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Ustavni sud, Belgija)";
    "pokrenuli su postupak za poništenje"->"Odredbe Zakona o javnoj nabavi kojima se određene pravne usluge, kao i određene usluge arbitraže i mirenja, isključuju iz područja primjene navedenog zakona." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 16 gennaio 2017, P.M., N.G.d.M. e P.V.d.S., ricorrenti nel procedimento principale, avvocati e soggetti con una formazione giuridica, hanno adito il giudice del rinvio, il Grondwettelijk Hof (Corte costituzionale, Belgio), con un ricorso di annullamento delle disposizioni della legge sugli appalti pubblici, che escludono determinati servizi legali, nonché determinati servizi di arbitrato e di conciliazione, dall’ambito di applicazione di detta legge.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Corte costituzionale, Belgio)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"hanno adito il giudice del rinvio, il Grondwettelijk Hof (Corte costituzionale, Belgio), con un ricorso di annullamento";
    "P. V.d.S"->"hanno adito il giudice del rinvio, il Grondwettelijk Hof (Corte costituzionale, Belgio), con un ricorso di annullamento";
    "N. G.d.M"->"hanno adito il giudice del rinvio, il Grondwettelijk Hof (Corte costituzionale, Belgio), con un ricorso di annullamento";
    "hanno adito il giudice del rinvio, il Grondwettelijk Hof (Corte costituzionale, Belgio), con un ricorso di annullamento"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Corte costituzionale, Belgio)";
    "hanno adito il giudice del rinvio, il Grondwettelijk Hof (Corte costituzionale, Belgio), con un ricorso di annullamento"->"Le disposizioni della legge sugli appalti pubblici, che escludono determinati servizi legali, nonché determinati servizi di arbitrato e di conciliazione, dall’ambito di applicazione di detta legge." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

2017. gada 16. janvārī P. M., N. G.d.M. un P. V.d.S. – prasītāji pamatlietā – advokāti un kvalificēti tiesību speciālisti, vērsās iesniedzējtiesā, Grondwettelijk Hof (Konstitucionālā tiesa, Beļģija), ar prasību atcelt tiesību aktu, kas bija vērsta pret Publisko iepirkumu likuma normām, ar kurām no šī likuma piemērošanas jomas tiek izslēgti noteikti juridiskie pakalpojumi, kā arī noteikti šķīrējtiesas un samierināšanas pakalpojumi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Konstitucionālā tiesa, Beļģija)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"ar prasību atcelt tiesību aktu";
    "P. V.d.S"->"ar prasību atcelt tiesību aktu";
    "N. G.d.M"->"ar prasību atcelt tiesību aktu";
    "ar prasību atcelt tiesību aktu"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Konstitucionālā tiesa, Beļģija)";
    "ar prasību atcelt tiesību aktu"->"Publisko iepirkumu likuma normām, ar kurām no šī likuma piemērošanas jomas tiek izslēgti noteikti juridiskie pakalpojumi, kā arī noteikti šķīrējtiesas un samierināšanas pakalpojumi." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2017 m. sausio 16 d. pareiškėjai pagrindinėje byloje P. M., N. G.d.M. ir P. V.d.S., kurie yra advokatai ir diplomuoti teisininkai, kreipėsi į Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgijos Konstitucinis Teismas) su prašymu pripažinti negaliojančiomis Viešųjų pirkimų įstatymo nuostatas, kuriomis į šio įstatymo taikymo sritį neįtraukiamos tam tikros teisinės, arbitražo ir taikinimo paslaugos.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgijos Konstitucinis Teismas)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"kreipėsi į Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgijos Konstitucinis Teismas) su prašymu pripažinti negaliojančiomis Viešųjų pirkimų įstatymo nuostatas";
    "P. V.d.S"->"kreipėsi į Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgijos Konstitucinis Teismas) su prašymu pripažinti negaliojančiomis Viešųjų pirkimų įstatymo nuostatas";
    "N. G.d.M"->"kreipėsi į Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgijos Konstitucinis Teismas) su prašymu pripažinti negaliojančiomis Viešųjų pirkimų įstatymo nuostatas";
    "kreipėsi į Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgijos Konstitucinis Teismas) su prašymu pripažinti negaliojančiomis Viešųjų pirkimų įstatymo nuostatas"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgijos Konstitucinis Teismas)";
    "kreipėsi į Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgijos Konstitucinis Teismas) su prašymu pripažinti negaliojančiomis Viešųjų pirkimų įstatymo nuostatas"->"Viešųjų pirkimų įstatymo nuostatas, kuriomis į šio įstatymo taikymo sritį neįtraukiamos tam tikros teisinės, arbitražo ir taikinimo paslaugos." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2017. január 16‑án P. M., N. G.d.M. és P. V.d.S., az alapeljárás felperesei – akik ügyvédek és jogászok – a kérdést előterjesztő bírósághoz, a Grondwettelijk Hofhoz (alkotmánybíróság, Belgium) fordultak a közbeszerzésekről szóló törvény rendelkezéseinek megsemmisítése iránt, amelyek bizonyos jogi szolgáltatásokat, valamint bizonyos választottbírói és békéltetési szolgáltatásokat kizárnak az említett törvény hatálya alól.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (alkotmánybíróság, Belgium)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"a közbeszerzésekről szóló törvény rendelkezéseinek megsemmisítése iránt";
    "P. V.d.S"->"a közbeszerzésekről szóló törvény rendelkezéseinek megsemmisítése iránt";
    "N. G.d.M"->"a közbeszerzésekről szóló törvény rendelkezéseinek megsemmisítése iránt";
    "a közbeszerzésekről szóló törvény rendelkezéseinek megsemmisítése iránt"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (alkotmánybíróság, Belgium)";
    "a közbeszerzésekről szóló törvény rendelkezéseinek megsemmisítése iránt"->"a közbeszerzésekről szóló törvény rendelkezéseinek megsemmisítése iránt, amelyek bizonyos jogi szolgáltatásokat, valamint bizonyos választottbírói és békéltetési szolgáltatásokat kizárnak az említett törvény hatálya alól." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fis-16 ta’ Jannar 2017, P. M., N. G.d.M. u P. V.d.S., rikorrenti fil-kawża prinċipali, avukati u avukati tat-taħriġ, ressqu quddiem il-qorti tar-rinviju, il-Grondwetelijk Hof (il-Qorti Kostituzzjonali, il-Belġju), rikors għal annullament intiż għad-dispożizzjonijiet tal-Liġi dwar il-Kuntratti Pubbliċi, li teskludi ċerti servizzi legali, kif ukoll ċerti servizzi ta’ arbitraġġ u konċiljazzjoni, mill-kamp ta’ applikazzjoni ta’ dik il-liġi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Qorti Kostituzzjonali, il-Belġju)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"Rikors għal annullament";
    "P. V.d.S"->"Rikors għal annullament";
    "N. G.d.M"->"Rikors għal annullament";
    "Rikors għal annullament"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Qorti Kostituzzjonali, il-Belġju)";
    "Rikors għal annullament"->"Dispożizzjonijiet tal-Liġi dwar il-Kuntratti Pubbliċi, li teskludi ċerti servizzi legali, kif ukoll ċerti servizzi ta’ arbitraġġ u konċiljazzjoni, mill-kamp ta’ applikazzjoni ta’ dik il-liġi." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 16 januari 2017 hebben P. M., P. V.d.S. en N. G.d.M., verzoekende partijen in het hoofdgeding, advocaten en geschoolde juristen, bij de verwijzende rechter, het Grondwettelijk Hof (België), een beroep tot nietigverklaring ingesteld dat betrekking heeft op de bepalingen van de wet inzake overheidsopdrachten waarbij bepaalde rechtskundige diensten en bepaalde arbitrage- en bemiddelingsdiensten van de werkingssfeer van die wet worden uitgesloten.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Grondwettelijk Hof (België))" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"een beroep tot nietigverklaring ingesteld";
    "P. V.d.S"->"een beroep tot nietigverklaring ingesteld";
    "N. G.d.M"->"een beroep tot nietigverklaring ingesteld";
    "een beroep tot nietigverklaring ingesteld"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Grondwettelijk Hof (België))";
    "een beroep tot nietigverklaring ingesteld"->"De bepalingen van de wet inzake overheidsopdrachten waarbij bepaalde rechtskundige diensten en bepaalde arbitrage- en bemiddelingsdiensten van de werkingssfeer van die wet worden uitgesloten." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 16 stycznia 2017 r. P.M., N.G.d.M. i P.V.d.S., skarżący w postępowaniu głównym, będący adwokatami i osobami posiadającymi wykształcenie prawnicze wnieśli do sądu odsyłającego, Grondwettelijk Hof (trybunału konstytucyjnego, Belgia), skargę o stwierdzenie nieważności przepisów ustawy o zamówieniach publicznych, które wykluczają niektóre usługi prawne, jak również niektóre usługi arbitrażowe i pojednawcze z zakresu stosowania tej ustawy.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Trybunał Konstytucyjny, Belgia)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"wnieśli do sądu skargę o stwierdzenie nieważności";
    "P. V.d.S"->"wnieśli do sądu skargę o stwierdzenie nieważności";
    "N. G.d.M"->"wnieśli do sądu skargę o stwierdzenie nieważności";
    "wnieśli do sądu skargę o stwierdzenie nieważności"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Trybunał Konstytucyjny, Belgia)";
    "wnieśli do sądu skargę o stwierdzenie nieważności"->"Przepisy ustawy o zamówieniach publicznych, które wykluczają niektóre usługi prawne, jak również niektóre usługi arbitrażowe i pojednawcze z zakresu stosowania tej ustawy." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 16 de janeiro de 2017, P. M., N. G.d.M. e P. V.d.S., recorrentes no processo principal, advogados e juristas de formação, interpuseram no órgão jurisdicional de reenvio, o Grondwettelijk Hof (Tribunal Constitucional, Bélgica), um recurso de anulação das disposições da Lei dos contratos públicos, que excluem certos serviços jurídicos, bem como certos serviços de arbitragem e conciliação, do âmbito de aplicação da referida lei.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Tribunal Constitucional, Bélgica)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"interpuseram um recurso de anulação";
    "P. V.d.S"->"interpuseram um recurso de anulação";
    "N. G.d.M"->"interpuseram um recurso de anulação";
    "interpuseram um recurso de anulação"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Tribunal Constitucional, Bélgica)";
    "interpuseram um recurso de anulação"->"as disposições da Lei dos contratos públicos, que excluem certos serviços jurídicos, bem como certos serviços de arbitragem e conciliação, do âmbito de aplicação da referida lei." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 16 ianuarie 2017, P. M., N. G.d.M. și P. V.d.S., reclamanți în litigiul principal, avocați și juriști de profesie, au sesizat instanța de trimitere, Grondwtellijk Hof (Curtea Constituțională, Belgia), cu o acțiune în anulare având ca obiect dispozițiile Legii privind contractele de achiziții publice care exclud anumite servicii juridice, precum și anumite servicii de arbitraj și de conciliere din domeniul de aplicare al legii menționate.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Curtea Constituțională, Belgia)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"au sesizat instanța de trimitere, Grondwtellijk Hof (Curtea Constituțională, Belgia), cu o acțiune în anulare";
    "P. V.d.S"->"au sesizat instanța de trimitere, Grondwtellijk Hof (Curtea Constituțională, Belgia), cu o acțiune în anulare";
    "N. G.d.M"->"au sesizat instanța de trimitere, Grondwtellijk Hof (Curtea Constituțională, Belgia), cu o acțiune în anulare";
    "au sesizat instanța de trimitere, Grondwtellijk Hof (Curtea Constituțională, Belgia), cu o acțiune în anulare"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Curtea Constituțională, Belgia)";
    "au sesizat instanța de trimitere, Grondwtellijk Hof (Curtea Constituțională, Belgia), cu o acțiune în anulare"->"Dispozițiile Legii privind contractele de achiziții publice care exclud anumite servicii juridice, precum și anumite servicii de arbitraj și de conciliere din domeniul de aplicare al legii menționate." [dir=none];
    
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.
P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.
Case C-264/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 16. januára 2017, P. M., N. G.d.M. a P. V. d.S., žalobcovia vo veci samej, advokáti a právnici v odbornej príprave, podali na vnútroštátny súd, Grondwettelijk Hof (Ústavný súd, Belgicko), žalobu o neplatnosť ustanovení zákona o verejnom obstarávaní, ktorými sa z pôsobnosti uvedeného zákona vylučujú určité právne služby, ako aj niektoré rozhodcovské a zmierovacie služby.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    node [shape=box];
    
    "Grondwettelijk Hof (Ústavný súd, Belgicko)" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "N. G.d.M" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    "P. V.d.S" [shape=doubleoctagon];
    
    "P.M"->"podali žalobu o neplatnosť";
    "P. V.d.S"->"podali žalobu o neplatnosť";
    "N. G.d.M"->"podali žalobu o neplatnosť";
    "podali žalobu o neplatnosť"->"Grondwettelijk Hof (Ústavný súd, Belgicko)";
    "podali žalobu o neplatnosť"->"Ustanovení zákona o verejnom obstarávaní, ktorými sa z pôsobnosti uvedeného zákona vylučujú určité právne služby, ako aj niektoré rozhodcovské a zmierovacie služby." [dir=none];
    
    
}