mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

OG yra Lietuvos pilietis, gyvenantis Airijoje. 2016 m. gegužės 13 d. jį paprašyta perduoti pagal Liubeko prokuratūros išduotą Europos arešto orderį, siekiant vykdyti baudžiamąjį persekiojimą dėl, kaip įtariama, 1995 m. OG padarytų veikų, kurias ši prokuratūra kvalifikavo kaip „nužudymą ir sunkų kūno sužalojimą“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Liubeko prokuratūros"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Airijoje"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europos arešto orderis"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "Liubeko prokuratūros"->"Europos arešto orderis"[label="išduotą Europos arešto orderį 13/05/2016"];
  "Europos arešto orderis"->"Airijoje"[label="paprašyta perduoti OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

OG írországi lakcímen tartózkodó litván állampolgár. 2016. május 13‑án a lübecki ügyészség által kibocsátott európai elfogatóparancs alapján kérték OG átadását az elfogása és az általa állítólagosan 1995‑ben elkövetett, ezen ügyészség által „szándékos emberölésnek és súlyos testi sértésnek” minősített cselekmények miatti büntetőeljárás lefolytatása céljából.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "lübecki ügyészség"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Írországi"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európai elfogatóparancs"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "lübecki ügyészség"->"európai elfogatóparancs"[label="2016. május 13‑án a lübecki ügyészség által kibocsátott európai elfogatóparancs 13/05/2016"];
  "európai elfogatóparancs"->"Írországi"[label="kérték OG átadását OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Og huwa ċittadin Litwan residenti fl-Irlanda. Fit-13 ta’ Mejju 2016, il-konsenja tiegħu ntalbet skont mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew maħruġ milll-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Lübeck għall-finijiet ta’ prosekuzzjoni kriminali għal fatti li OG allegatament wettaq matul l-1995, u li dan l-uffiċċju tal-prosekutur ikklassifika bħala “omiċidju volontarju, offiża gravi fuq persuna”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Lübeck"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irlanda"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Lübeck"->"mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[label="mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew 13/05/2016"];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"->"Irlanda"[label="il-konsenja tiegħu ntalbet OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

OG is een in Ierland verblijvende Litouws staatsburger. Op 13 mei 2016 is zijn overlevering gevraagd op grond van een door het openbaar ministerie van Lübeck uitgevaardigd Europees aanhoudingsbevel met het oog op strafvervolging voor feiten die OG in de loop van 1995 zou hebben gepleegd en die door het openbaar ministerie zijn gekwalificeerd als „moord en doodslag, zware mishandeling”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "het openbaar ministerie van Lübeck"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Ierland"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "het openbaar ministerie van Lübeck"->"Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[label="Europees aanhoudingsbevel 13/05/2016"];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"->"Ierland"[label="is zijn overlevering gevraagd OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

OG jest obywatelem Litwy mieszkającym w Irlandii. W dniu 13 maja 2016 r. został złożony wniosek o jego przekazanie na podstawie europejskiego nakazu aresztowania wydanego przez prokuraturę w Lubece, w celu przeprowadzenia postępowania karnego w związku z czynami, których OG miał się dopuścić w 1995 r. i które prokuratura ta zakwalifikowała jako „zabójstwo, ciężkie uszkodzenie ciała”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "prokuraturę w Lubece"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irlandii"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europejskiego nakazu aresztowania"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "prokuraturę w Lubece"->"europejskiego nakazu aresztowania"[label="wniosek o jego przekazanie na podstawie europejskiego nakazu aresztowania wydanego przez prokuraturę w Lubece, w celu przeprowadzenia postępowania karnego w związku z czynami, których OG miał się dopuścić w 1995 r. i które prokuratura ta zakwalifikowała jako „zabójstwo, ciężkie uszkodzenie ciała”. 13/05/2016"];
  "europejskiego nakazu aresztowania"->"Irlandii"[label="wniosek o jego przekazanie OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

OG é um nacional lituano que reside na Irlanda. Em 13 de maio de 2016, foi pedida a sua entrega em aplicação de um mandado de detenção europeu emitido pela Procuradoria de Lübeck para efeitos de procedimentos penais por factos que OG alegadamente cometera em 1995 e que esta procuradoria qualificou de «homicídio voluntário, ofensas corporais graves».

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Procuradoria de Lübeck"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irlanda"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "Procuradoria de Lübeck"->"mandado de detenção europeu"[label="mandado de detenção europeu emitido pela Procuradoria de Lübeck 13/05/2016"];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"->"Irlanda"[label="foi pedida a sua entrega OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

OG este un resortisant lituanian cu reședința în Irlanda. La 13 mai 2016, a fost solicitată predarea sa în temeiul unui mandat european de arestare emis de Parchetul din Lübeck în scopul urmăririi penale pentru fapte pe care OG le‑ar fi săvârșit în cursul anului 1995 și pe care acest parchet le‑a calificat drept „omor și vătămare corporală gravă”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Parchetul din Lübeck"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irlanda"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat european de arestare"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "Parchetul din Lübeck"->"mandat european de arestare"[label="mandat european de arestare emis de Parchetul din Lübeck 13/05/2016"];
  "mandat european de arestare"->"Irlanda"[label="a fost solicitată predarea sa OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

OG je litovským štátnym príslušníkom s bydliskom v Írsku. Dňa 13. mája 2016 prokuratúra v Lübecku vydala európsky zatykač, ktorým požiadala o odovzdanie OG na účely trestného stíhania za skutky, ktorých sa mal dopustiť v roku 1995 a ktoré uvedená prokuratúra kvalifikovala ako „vražda, ťažké ublíženie na zdraví“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "prokuratúra v Lübecku"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Írsku"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európsky zatykač"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "prokuratúra v Lübecku"->"európsky zatykač"[label="Dňa 13. mája 2016 prokuratúra v Lübecku vydala európsky zatykač 13/05/2016"];
  "európsky zatykač"->"Írsku"[label="požiadala o odovzdanie OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

OG je litovski državljan, ki prebiva na Irskem. Na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje, ki ga je izdalo državno tožilstvo v Lübecku zaradi kazenskega pregona zaradi dejanj, ki naj bi jih OG storil v letu 1995 in ki jih je to državno tožilstvo opredelilo kot „umor in povzročitev hudih telesnih poškodb“, je bila 13. maja 2016 zahtevana njegova predaja.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "državno tožilstvo v Lübecku"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irskem"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "evropskega naloga za prijetje"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "državno tožilstvo v Lübecku"->"evropskega naloga za prijetje"[label="izdalo 13/05/2016"];
  "evropskega naloga za prijetje"->"Irskem"[label="zahtevana njegova predaja. OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

OG on Liettuan kansalainen ja oleskelee Irlannissa. Hänen luovuttamistaan pyydettiin 13.5.2016 Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomaisen antaman eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen nojalla rikosoikeudellista menettelyä varten sellaisten tekojen perusteella, joihin hänen väitettiin syyllistyneen vuonna 1995 ja jotka täyttivät syyttäjän mukaan tapon ja vakavan ruumiinvamman tuottamisen tunnusmerkistön.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomaisen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irlannissa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomaisen"->"eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[label="Hänen luovuttamistaan pyydettiin 13.5.2016 Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomaisen antaman eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen nojalla rikosoikeudellista menettelyä varten sellaisten tekojen perusteella, joihin hänen väitettiin syyllistyneen vuonna 1995 ja jotka täyttivät syyttäjän mukaan tapon ja vakavan ruumiinvamman tuottamisen tunnusmerkistön. 13/05/2016"];
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"->"Irlannissa"[label="Hänen luovuttamistaan pyydettiin OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

OG är litauisk medborgare och vistas i Irland. Den 13 maj 2016 framställdes en begäran om att han skulle överlämnas med tillämpning av en europeisk arresteringsorder utfärdad av åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck. Arresteringsordern hade utfärdats för att OG skulle kunna lagföras för gärningar som han ska ha begått under år 1995 och som åklagaren har kvalificerat som ”mord och grov misshandel”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irland"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europeisk arresteringsorder"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck"->"europeisk arresteringsorder"[label="utfärdad 13/05/2016"];
  "europeisk arresteringsorder"->"Irland"[label="begäran om att han skulle överlämnas OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

OG brought an action before the High Court challenging the validity of that European arrest warrant, on the ground, inter alia, that the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Lübeck is not a ‘judicial authority’ within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

   "OG"->"Brought an action";
   "Brought an action"->"The High Court";
   "The Public Prosecutor’s Office in Lübeck is not a ‘judicial authority’ within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584"->"Brought an action"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

OG подава пред High Court (Висш съд) жалба, с която оспорва валидността на тази европейска заповед за арест, като по-специално изтъква факта, че прокуратурата на Любек не е съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"подава пред High Court (Висш съд) жалба";
  "подава пред High Court (Висш съд) жалба"->"High Court";
  "прокуратурата на Любек не е съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584"->"подава пред High Court (Висш съд) жалба"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Mediante recurso interpuesto ante la High Court (Tribunal Superior), OG impugnó la validez de dicha orden de detención europea, alegando, en particular, que la Fiscalía de Lübeck no es una «autoridad judicial» en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"Mediante recurso interpuesto";
  "Mediante recurso interpuesto"->"High Court";
  "la Fiscalía de Lübeck no es una «autoridad judicial» en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584"->"Mediante recurso interpuesto"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

OG podal u High Court (Vrchní soud) žalobu, kterou zpochybňoval platnost tohoto evropského zatýkacího rozkazu, přičemž se dovolával zejména skutečnosti, že státní zastupitelství v Lübecku není „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"podal u High Court (Vrchní soud) žalobu";
  "podal u High Court (Vrchní soud) žalobu"->"High Court";
  "státní zastupitelství v Lübecku není „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584"->"podal u High Court (Vrchní soud) žalobu"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

OG anlagde sag ved High Court (ret i første instans) med henblik på at anfægte gyldigheden af den europæiske arrestordre, idet OG bl.a. påberåbte sig den omstændighed, at anklagemyndigheden i Lübeck ikke er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"anlagde sag";
  "anlagde sag"->"High Court";
  "anklagemyndigheden i Lübeck ikke er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584"->"anlagde sag"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

OG erhob vor dem High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) Klage und stellte die Gültigkeit des Europäischen Haftbefehls u. a. mit dem Einwand in Abrede, dass die Staatsanwaltschaft Lübeck keine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 sei.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"erhob vor dem High Court Klage";
  "erhob vor dem High Court Klage"->"High Court";
  "die Staatsanwaltschaft Lübeck keine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584"->"erhob vor dem High Court Klage"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

OG vaidlustas Euroopa vahistamismääruse kehtivuse High Courtis (kõrge kohus), tuginedes eelkõige asjaolule, et Lübecki prokuratuur ei ole raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses „õigusasutus“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"vaidlustas";
  "vaidlustas"->"High Court";
  "Lübecki prokuratuur ei ole raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses „õigusasutus“. 2002/584"->"vaidlustas"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Ο OG προσέφυγε ενώπιον του High Court (ανώτερου δικαστηρίου) αμφισβητώντας την εγκυρότητα αυτού του ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως και προβάλλοντας, μεταξύ άλλων, ότι η εισαγγελία του Lübeck δεν είναι «δικαστική αρχή» κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"προσέφυγε";
  "προσέφυγε"->"High Court";
  "ότι η εισαγγελία του Lübeck δεν είναι «δικαστική αρχή» κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584. 2002/584"->"προσέφυγε"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

OG a saisi la High Court (Haute Cour) d’un recours tendant à contester la validité de ce mandat d’arrêt européen, en invoquant, notamment, le fait que le parquet de Lübeck n’est pas une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"a saisi la High Court d’un recours";
  "a saisi la High Court d’un recours"->"High Court";
  "le parquet de Lübeck n’est pas une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584"->"a saisi la High Court d’un recours"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

OG je pred High Courtom (Visoki sud) osporio valjanost tog europskog uhidbenog naloga pozivajući se, osobito, na činjenicu da Državno odvjetništvo u Lübecku nije „pravosudno tijelo” u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. Okvirne odluke 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"osporio valjanost";
  "osporio valjanost"->"High Court";
  "Državno odvjetništvo u Lübecku nije „pravosudno tijelo” u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. Okvirne odluke 2002/584"->"osporio valjanost"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

OG ha proposto ricorso dinanzi alla High Court (Alta Corte, Irlanda) per contestare la validità di tale mandato d’arresto europeo, sostenendo, segnatamente, che la procura di Lubecca non è un’«autorità giudiziaria», ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"ha proposto ricorso";
  "ha proposto ricorso"->"High Court";
  "la procura di Lubecca non è un’«autorità giudiziaria», ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584"->"ha proposto ricorso"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

OG cēla prasību High Court (Augstā tiesa), apstrīdot šī Eiropas apcietināšanas ordera spēkā esamību, tostarp norādot, ka Lībekas prokuratūra nav “tiesu iestāde” Pamatlēmuma 2002/584 6. panta 1. punkta izpratnē.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"cēla prasību";
  "cēla prasību"->"High Court";
  "Lībekas prokuratūra nav “tiesu iestāde” Pamatlēmuma 2002/584 6. panta 1. punkta izpratnē. 2002/584"->"cēla prasību"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

OG High Court (Aukštasis teismas) pateikė skundą, juo siekė užginčyti šio Europos arešto orderio galiojimą, be kita ko, remdamasis tuo, kad Liubeko prokuratūra nėra „teisminė institucija“, kaip tai suprantama pagal Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 6 straipsnio 1 dalį.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"pateikė skundą";
  "pateikė skundą"->"High Court";
  "Liubeko prokuratūra nėra „teisminė institucija“, kaip tai suprantama pagal Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 6 straipsnio 1 dalį. 2002/584"->"pateikė skundą"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

OG keresetet indított a High Court (felsőbíróság, Írország) előtt ezen európai elfogatóparancs érvényességének vitatása céljából, többek között arra hivatkozva, hogy a lübecki ügyészség nem a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése értelmében vett „igazságügyi hatóság”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"keresetet indított";
  "keresetet indított"->"High Court";
  "a lübecki ügyészség nem a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése értelmében vett „igazságügyi hatóság”. 2002/584"->"keresetet indított"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

OG adixxa lill-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) b’rikors li huwa intiż li jikkontesta l-validità ta’ dak il-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew, filwaqt li invoka b’mod partikolari l-fatt li l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Lübeck ma huwiex “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"adixxa lill-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) b’rikors";
  "adixxa lill-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) b’rikors"->"High Court";
  "l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Lübeck ma huwiex “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584"->"adixxa lill-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) b’rikors"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

OG stelde bij de High Court beroep in ter betwisting van de geldigheid van het Europees aanhoudingsbevel, waarbij hij onder meer betoogde dat het openbaar ministerie van Lübeck geen „rechterlijke autoriteit” is in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"stelde bij de High Court beroep in";
  "stelde bij de High Court beroep in"->"High Court";
  "het openbaar ministerie van Lübeck geen „rechterlijke autoriteit” is in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584. 2002/584"->"stelde bij de High Court beroep in"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

OG wniósł do High Court (wysokiego trybunału, Irlandia) skargę w celu podważenia ważności europejskiego nakazu aresztowania, powołując się w szczególności na fakt, że prokuratura w Lubece nie jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"wniósł do High Court skargę";
  "wniósł do High Court skargę"->"High Court";
  "prokuratura w Lubece nie jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584"->"wniósł do High Court skargę"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

OG interpôs na High Court (Tribunal Superior, Irlanda) um recurso destinado a contestar a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu, invocando, nomeadamente, o facto de a Procuradoria de Lübeck não ser uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"interpôs na High Court (Tribunal Superior, Irlanda) um recurso";
  "interpôs na High Court (Tribunal Superior, Irlanda) um recurso"->"High Court";
  "a Procuradoria de Lübeck não ser uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584"->"interpôs na High Court (Tribunal Superior, Irlanda) um recurso"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

OG a sesizat High Court (Înalta Curte) cu o acțiune prin care urmărea contestarea validității acestui mandat european de arestare, invocând în special faptul că Parchetul din Lübeck nu este o „autoritate judiciară” în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"a sesizat High Court (Înalta Curte) cu o acțiune";
  "a sesizat High Court (Înalta Curte) cu o acțiune"->"High Court";
  "Parchetul din Lübeck nu este o „autoritate judiciară” în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584. 2002/584"->"a sesizat High Court (Înalta Curte) cu o acțiune"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

OG podal na High Court (Vyšší súd) žalobu, ktorou namietal platnosť tohto európskeho zatykača, pričom predovšetkým uviedol, že prokuratúra v Lübecku nie je „súdnym orgánom“ v zmysle článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"podal na High Court (Vyšší súd) žalobu";
  "podal na High Court (Vyšší súd) žalobu"->"High Court";
  "že prokuratúra v Lübecku nie je „súdnym orgánom“ v zmysle článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584"->"podal na High Court (Vyšší súd) žalobu"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

OG je vložil tožbo pri High Court (višje sodišče, Irska), s katero izpodbija veljavnost tega evropskega naloga za prijetje in v kateri med drugim navaja, da državno tožilstvo v Lübecku ni „pravosodni organ“ v smislu člena 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"je vložil tožbo";
  "je vložil tožbo"->"High Court";
  "državno tožilstvo v Lübecku ni „pravosodni organ“ v smislu člena 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584"->"je vložil tožbo"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

OG kiisti High Courtissa tämän eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen pätevyyden vetoamalla muun muassa siihen, ettei Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomainen ollut puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "OG"->"kiisti High Courtissa";
  "kiisti High Courtissa"->"High Court";
  "Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomainen ei ollut puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen. 2002/584"->"kiisti High Courtissa"[dir=none];
}