mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

RE ha beneficiato di un primo congedo di maternità per il periodo dal 4 febbraio al 19 agosto 2001, seguito da un congedo parentale per l’educazione dei figli dal 6 settembre 2001 al 6 settembre 2003. Successivamente, ha fruito di un secondo congedo di maternità per il periodo dal 6 novembre 2007 al6 giugno 2008, seguito da un congedo parentale per l’educazione dei figli a far data dal 1o agosto 2008, in forma di riduzione pari a un quinto del suo orario di lavoro. Quest’ultimo congedo doveva terminare il 29 gennaio 2011.
Il 6 dicembre 2010, RE è stata licenziata nel contesto di una procedura di licenziamento collettivo per motivi economici ed ha accettato un congedo di riqualificazione di una durata di nove mesi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="licenziata nel contesto di una procedura di licenziamento collettivo per motivi economici 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="ha accettato un congedo di riqualificazione di una durata di nove mesi."];
  "RE"->"RE ha beneficiato di un primo congedo di maternità per il periodo dal 4 febbraio al 19 agosto 2001, seguito da un congedo parentale per l’educazione dei figli dal 6 settembre 2001 al 6 settembre 2003. Successivamente, ha fruito di un secondo congedo di maternità per il periodo dal 6 novembre 2007 al6 giugno 2008, seguito da un congedo parentale per l’educazione dei figli a far data dal 1o agosto 2008."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

RE izmantoja pirmo grūtniecības un dzemdību atvaļinājumu laikposmā no 2001. gada 4. februāra līdz 19. augustam, kam sekoja vecāku atvaļinājums mācībām no 2001. gada 6. septembra līdz 2003. gada 6. septembrim. Pēc tam viņa izmantoja otro grūtniecības un dzemdību atvaļinājumu laikposmā no 2007. gada 6. novembra līdz 2008. gada 6. jūnijam, kam sekoja vecāku atvaļinājums mācībām no 2008. gada 1. augusta, kurš izpaudās kā darba laika samazinājums par vienu piekto daļu. Šim pēdējām minētajam atvaļinājumam bija jāizbeidzas 2011. gada 29. janvārī.
2010. gada 6. decembrī RE tika atlaista no darba ekonomisku apsvērumu dēļ kolektīvas atlaišanas procedūrā. Viņa piekrita deviņu mēnešu ilgam pārkvalifikācijas atvaļinājumam.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="atlaista no darba ekonomisku apsvērumu dēļ kolektīvas atlaišanas procedūrā 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Viņa piekrita deviņu mēnešu ilgam pārkvalifikācijas atvaļinājumam."];
  "RE"->"RE izmantoja pirmo grūtniecības un dzemdību atvaļinājumu laikposmā no 2001. gada 4. februāra līdz 19. augustam, kam sekoja vecāku atvaļinājums mācībām no 2001. gada 6. septembra līdz 2003. gada 6. septembrim. Pēc tam viņa izmantoja otro grūtniecības un dzemdību atvaļinājumu laikposmā no 2007. gada 6. novembra līdz 2008. gada 6. jūnijam, kam sekoja vecāku atvaļinājums mācībām no 2008. gada 1. augusta, kurš izpaudās kā darba laika samazinājums par vienu piekto daļu."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

RE išėjo pirmųjų motinystės atostogų nuo 2001 m. vasario 4 d. iki 2001 m. rugpjūčio 19 d., vėliau – vaiko priežiūros atostogų nuo 2001 m. rugsėjo 6 d. iki 2003 m. rugsėjo 6 d. Ji antrą kartą išėjo motinystės atostogų, kurios truko nuo 2007 m. lapkričio 6 d. iki 2008 m. birželio 6 d., ir vaiko priežiūros atostogų nuo 2008 m. rugpjūčio 1 d., per kurias jai buvo taikomas darbo laiko sumažinimas 1/5 dalimi. Šios vaiko priežiūros atostogos turėjo pasibaigti 2011 m. sausio 29 d.
2010 m. gruodžio 6 d. RE buvo atleista iš darbo dėl ekonominių priežasčių, vykdant kolektyvinį atleidimą. Ji pareiškė sutinkanti su devynių mėnesių trukmės kvalifikacijos keitimo atostogomis.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Atleista iš darbo dėl ekonominių priežasčių, vykdant kolektyvinį atleidimą 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="sutinkanti su devynių mėnesių trukmės kvalifikacijos keitimo atostogomis."];
  "RE"->"RE išėjo pirmųjų motinystės atostogų nuo 2001 m. vasario 4 d. iki 2001 m. rugpjūčio 19 d., vėliau – vaiko priežiūros atostogų nuo 2001 m. rugsėjo 6 d. iki 2003 m. rugsėjo 6 d. Ji antrą kartą išėjo motinystės atostogų, kurios truko nuo 2007 m. lapkričio 6 d. iki 2008 m. birželio 6 d., ir vaiko priežiūros atostogų nuo 2008 m. rugpjūčio 1 d., per kurias jai buvo taikomas darbo laiko sumažinimas 1/5 dalimi. Šios vaiko priežiūros atostogos turėjo pasibaigti 2011 m. sausio 29 d."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

RE először a 2001. február 4. és augusztus 19. közötti időszakban volt szülői szabadságon, majd a 2001. szeptember 6. és 2003. szeptember 6. közötti időszakban gyermeknevelési célú szülői szabadságon volt. Ezt követően a 2007. november 6. és 2008. június 6. közötti időszakban másodszor is szülői szabadságon volt, majd 2008. augusztus 1‑jétől a gyermeknevelési célú szülői szabadságot abban a formában vette igénybe, hogy a munkaideje az egyötödével csökkent. Ez az utóbbi szabadság 2011. január 29‑én járt volna le.
RE‑t 2010. december 6‑án gazdasági okból, csoportos létszámcsökkentés keretében elbocsátották. RE kilenc hónap időtartamú átképzési szabadságban részesült.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="2010. december 6‑án gazdasági okból, csoportos létszámcsökkentés keretében elbocsátották. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="RE kilenc hónap időtartamú átképzési szabadságban részesült."];
  "RE"->"RE először a 2001. február 4. és augusztus 19. közötti időszakban volt szülői szabadságon, majd a 2001. szeptember 6. és 2003. szeptember 6. közötti időszakban gyermeknevelési célú szülői szabadságon volt. Ezt követően a 2007. november 6. és 2008. június 6. közötti időszakban másodszor is szülői szabadságon volt, majd 2008. augusztus 1‑jétől a gyermeknevelési célú szülői szabadságot abban a formában vette igénybe, hogy a munkaideje az egyötödével csökkent."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

RE bbenefikat minn leave tal-maternità għall-ewwel darba, għall-perijodu bejn l‑4 ta’ Frar u d-19 ta’ Awwissu 2001, segwit minn leave parentali ta’ edukazzjoni, bejn is-6 ta’ Settembru 2001 u s-6 ta’ Settembru 2003. Imbagħad hija bbenefikat mit-tieni leave tal-maternità, għall-perijodu bejn is-6 ta’ Novembru 2007 u s-6 ta’ Ġunju 2008, segwit minn leave parentali ta’ edukazzjoni mill-1 ta’ Awwissu 2008, fil-forma ta’ tnaqqis b’wieħed mill-ħamsa tal-ħin tax-xogħol. Dan il-leave msemmi l-aħħar kellu jintemm fid-29 ta’ Jannar 2011.
Fis-6 ta’ Diċembru 2010, RE tkeċċiet fil-kuntest ta’ proċedura ta’ tkeċċija kollettiva għal raġuni ekonomika. Hija aċċettat leave ta’ klassifikazzjoni mill-ġdid ta’ tul ta’ żmien ta’ disa’ xhur.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="tkeċċiet fil-kuntest ta’ proċedura ta’ tkeċċija kollettiva għal raġuni ekonomika 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="aċċettat leave ta’ klassifikazzjoni mill-ġdid ta’ tul ta’ żmien ta’ disa’ xhur."];
  "RE"->"bbenefikat minn leave tal-maternità għall-ewwel darba, għall-perijodu bejn l‑4 ta’ Frar u d-19 ta’ Awwissu 2001, segwit minn leave parentali ta’ edukazzjoni, bejn is-6 ta’ Settembru 2001 u s-6 ta’ Settembru 2003. Imbagħad hija bbenefikat mit-tieni leave tal-maternità, għall-perijodu bejn is-6 ta’ Novembru 2007 u s-6 ta’ Ġunju 2008, segwit minn leave parentali ta’ edukazzjoni mill-1 ta’ Awwissu 2008, fil-forma ta’ tnaqqis b’wieħed mill-ħamsa tal-ħin tax-xogħol."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Na een eerste zwangerschaps‑ en bevallingsverlof van 4 februari 2001 tot en met 19 augustus 2001, gevolgd door ouderschapsverlof van 6 september 2001 tot en met 6 september 2003, heeft RE voor een tweede keer zwangerschaps‑ en bevallingsverlof opgenomen van 6 november 2007 tot en met 6 juni 2008, gevolgd door ouderschapsverlof vanaf 1 augustus 2008 in de vorm van arbeidstijdverkorting met een vijfde. Laatstgenoemd verlof zou normaal eindigen op 29 januari 2011.
Op 6 december 2010 is RE in het kader van een collectieve ontslagprocedure ontslagen om economische redenen. Zij heeft ingestemd met negen maanden re‑integratieverlof.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Op 6 december 2010 is RE in het kader van een collectieve ontslagprocedure ontslagen om economische redenen. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Zij heeft ingestemd met negen maanden re‑integratieverlof."];
  "RE"->"Na een eerste zwangerschaps‑ en bevallingsverlof van 4 februari 2001 tot en met 19 augustus 2001, gevolgd door ouderschapsverlof van 6 september 2001 tot en met 6 september 2003, heeft RE voor een tweede keer zwangerschaps‑ en bevallingsverlof opgenomen van 6 november 2007 tot en met 6 juni 2008, gevolgd door ouderschapsverlof vanaf 1 augustus 2008 in de vorm van arbeidstijdverkorting met een vijfde."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W okresie od 4 lutego do 19 sierpnia 2001 r. RE przebywała na pierwszym urlopie macierzyńskim, a następnie w okresie od 6 września 2001 r. do 6 września 2003 r. na urlopie rodzicielskim. Później RE skorzystała z kolejnego urlopu macierzyńskiego w okresie od 6 listopada 2007 r. do 6 czerwca 2008 r., po czym od dnia 1 sierpnia 2008 r. przebywała na urlopie rodzicielskim, który łączyła ze świadczeniem pracy w obniżonym o jedną piątą wymiarze czasu pracy. Ten ostatni urlop miał zakończyć się w dniu 29 stycznia 2011 r.
W dniu 6 grudnia 2010 r. RE została zwolniona z przyczyn ekonomicznych, w ramach zwolnień grupowych. Zgodziła się na skorzystanie z dziewięciomiesięcznego urlopu na przekwalifikowanie.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="zwolniona z przyczyn ekonomicznych, w ramach zwolnień grupowych. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Zgodziła się na skorzystanie z dziewięciomiesięcznego urlopu na przekwalifikowanie."];
  "RE"->"W okresie od 4 lutego do 19 sierpnia 2001 r. RE przebywała na pierwszym urlopie macierzyńskim, a następnie w okresie od 6 września 2001 r. do 6 września 2003 r. na urlopie rodzicielskim. Później RE skorzystała z kolejnego urlopu macierzyńskiego w okresie od 6 listopada 2007 r. do 6 czerwca 2008 r., po czym od dnia 1 sierpnia 2008 r. przebywała na urlopie rodzicielskim."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

RE gozou uma primeira licença de maternidade, pelo período entre 4 de fevereiro e 19 de agosto de 2001, seguida de uma licença parental para assistência aos filhos, entre 6 de setembro de 2001 e 6 de setembro de 2003. Em seguida, gozou uma segunda licença de maternidade, entre 6 de novembro de 2007 e 6 de junho de 2008, seguida de uma licença parental para assistência aos filhos a partir de 1 de agosto de 2008, sob a forma de redução de um quinto do tempo de trabalho. Esta última licença devia terminar em 29 de janeiro de 2011.
Em 6 de dezembro de 2010, RE foi despedida no âmbito de um processo de despedimento coletivo por motivos económicos. Aceitou uma licença de requalificação com uma duração de nove meses.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="despedida no âmbito de um processo de despedimento coletivo por motivos económicos 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Aceitou uma licença de requalificação com uma duração de nove meses."];
  "RE"->"RE gozou uma primeira licença de maternidade, pelo período entre 4 de fevereiro e 19 de agosto de 2001, seguida de uma licença parental para assistência aos filhos, entre 6 de setembro de 2001 e 6 de setembro de 2003. Em seguida, gozou uma segunda licença de maternidade, entre 6 de novembro de 2007 e 6 de junho de 2008, seguida de uma licença parental para assistência aos filhos a partir de 1 de agosto de 2008."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

RE a beneficiat de un prim concediu de maternitate pentru perioada cuprinsă între 4 februarie și 19 august 2001, urmat de un concediu pentru creșterea copilului de la 6 septembrie 2001 până la 6 septembrie 2003. În continuare, ea a beneficiat de un al doilea concediu de maternitate pentru perioada cuprinsă între 6 noiembrie 2007 și 6 iunie 2008, urmat de un concediu pentru creșterea copilului începând cu 1 august 2008, sub forma unei reduceri cu o cincime a timpului de lucru. Acest din urmă concediu trebuia să se încheie la 29 ianuarie 2011.
La 6 decembrie 2010, RE a fost concediată în cadrul unei proceduri de concediere colectivă pentru motive economice. Ea a acceptat un concediu de reorientare profesională cu o durată de nouă luni.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="RE a fost concediată în cadrul unei proceduri de concediere colectivă pentru motive economice. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="A acceptat un concediu de reorientare profesională cu o durată de nouă luni."];
  "RE"->"RE a beneficiat de un prim concediu de maternitate pentru perioada cuprinsă între 4 februarie și 19 august 2001, urmat de un concediu pentru creșterea copilului de la 6 septembrie 2001 până la 6 septembrie 2003. În continuare, ea a beneficiat de un al doilea concediu de maternitate pentru perioada cuprinsă între 6 noiembrie 2007 și 6 iunie 2008, urmat de un concediu pentru creșterea copilului începând cu 1 august 2008."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

RE čerpala od 4. februára do 19. augusta 2001 prvú materskú dovolenku a od 6. septembra 2001 do 6. septembra 2003 rodičovskú dovolenku na výchovu dieťaťa. Následne od 6. novembra 2007 do 6. júna 2008 čerpala druhú materskú dovolenku, po ktorej nasledovala rodičovská dovolenka na výchovu dieťaťa od 1. augusta 2008, a to vo forme zníženia pracovného úväzku o jednu pätinu. Táto posledná uvedená rodičovská dovolenka mala byť ukončená 29. januára 2011.
Dňa 6. decembra 2010 bola RE prepustená v rámci hromadného prepúšťania z ekonomických dôvodov. Súhlasila s prípravným rekvalifikačným voľnom v dĺžke deväť mesiacov.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Dňa 6. decembra 2010 bola RE prepustená v rámci hromadného prepúšťania z ekonomických dôvodov. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Súhlasila s prípravným rekvalifikačným voľnom v dĺžke deväť mesiacov."];
  "RE"->"RE čerpala od 4. februára do 19. augusta 2001 prvú materskú dovolenku a od 6. septembra 2001 do 6. septembra 2003 rodičovskú dovolenku na výchovu dieťaťa. Následne od 6. novembra 2007 do 6. júna 2008 čerpala druhú materskú dovolenku, po ktorej nasledovala rodičovská dovolenka na výchovu dieťaťa od 1. augusta 2008, a to vo forme zníženia pracovného úväzku o jednu pätinu."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

RE je v obdobju od 4. februarja do 19. avgusta 2001 koristila prvi porodniški dopust, nato pa od 6. septembra 2001 do 6. septembra 2003 še starševski dopust. Dalje, v obdobju od 6. novembra 2007 do 6. junija 2008 je koristila drugi porodniški dopust, ter od 1. avgusta 2008 starševski dopust v obliki petine krajšega delovnega časa. Zadnji starševski dopust bi se moral končati 29. januarja 2011.
RE je bila 6. decembra 2010 v okviru kolektivnih odpustov iz poslovnih razlogov odpovedana pogodba o zaposlitvi. RE je sprejela devetmesečni dopust za prezaposlovanje.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="6. decembra 2010 v okviru kolektivnih odpustov iz poslovnih razlogov odpovedana pogodba o zaposlitvi. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="RE je sprejela devetmesečni dopust za prezaposlovanje."];
  "RE"->"RE je v obdobju od 4. februarja do 19. avgusta 2001 koristila prvi porodniški dopust, nato pa od 6. septembra 2001 do 6. septembra 2003 še starševski dopust. Dalje, v obdobju od 6. novembra 2007 do 6. junija 2008 je koristila drugi porodniški dopust, ter od 1. avgusta 2008 starševski dopust v obliki petine krajšega delovnega časa. Zadnji starševski dopust bi se moral končati 29. januarja 2011."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

RE oli ensimmäisen kerran äitiysvapaalla 4.2.–19.8.2001, ja sen jälkeen hoitovapaalla 6.9.2001–6.9.2003. Tämän jälkeen hän oli toisen kerran äitiysvapaalla 6.11.2007–6.6.2008, ja sen jälkeen 1.8.2008 alkaen hoitovapaalla siten, että hänen työaikaansa vähennettiin viidenneksellä. Viimeksi mainitun vapaan oli tarkoitus päättyä 29.1.2011.
RE irtisanottiin 6.12.2010 taloudellisilla perusteilla toteutetun joukkoirtisanomisen yhteydessä. Hän hyväksyi yhdeksän kuukauden kestoisen uudelleentyöllistymisvapaan.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="RE irtisanottiin 6.12.2010 taloudellisilla perusteilla toteutetun joukkoirtisanomisen yhteydessä. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Hän hyväksyi yhdeksän kuukauden kestoisen uudelleentyöllistymisvapaan."];
  "RE"->"RE oli ensimmäisen kerran äitiysvapaalla 4.2.–19.8.2001, ja sen jälkeen hoitovapaalla 6.9.2001–6.9.2003. Tämän jälkeen hän oli toisen kerran äitiysvapaalla 6.11.2007–6.6.2008, ja sen jälkeen 1.8.2008 alkaen hoitovapaalla siten, että hänen työaikaansa vähennettiin viidenneksellä."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

RE var mammaledig en första gång från den 4 februari till den 19 augusti 2001. Denna ledighet följdes av föräldraledighet från den 6 september 2001 till den 6 september 2003. Hon var därefter mammaledig en andra gång från den 6 november 2007 till den 6 juni 2008, och därefter föräldraledig från den 1 augusti 2008, i form av en nedsättning av arbetstiden med 20 procent. Sistnämnda ledighet skulle avslutas den 29 januari 2011.
Den 6 december 2010 sades RE upp inom ramen för ett kollektivt uppsägningsförfarande av ekonomiska skäl. Hon godtog en ledighet för omplaceringsåtgärder om nio månader.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Sades RE upp inom ramen för ett kollektivt uppsägningsförfarande av ekonomiska skäl. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Hon godtog en ledighet för omplaceringsåtgärder om nio månader."];
  "RE"->"RE var mammaledig en första gång från den 4 februari till den 19 augusti 2001. Denna ledighet följdes av föräldraledighet från den 6 september 2001 till den 6 september 2003. Hon var därefter mammaledig en andra gång från den 6 november 2007 till den 6 juni 2008, och därefter föräldraledig från den 1 augusti 2008, i form av en nedsättning av arbetstiden med 20 procent. Sistnämnda ledighet skulle avslutas den 29 januari 2011."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: English

RE took a first period of maternity leave from 4 February 2001 to 19 August 2001, followed by a period of childcare leave from 6 September 2001 to 6 September 2003. She then took a second period of maternity leave from 6 November 2007 to 6 June 2008, followed by a period of childcare leave from 1 August 2008, in the form of her working hours being reduced by one fifth. That last period of childcare leave was supposed to end on 29 January 2011.
On 6 December 2010, RE was made redundant as part of a collective redundancy on economic grounds. She accepted redeployment leave for a period of 9 months.
After having relinquished the right to a reduction in her working hours with effect from 1 January 2011, RE left Praxair MRC on 7 September 2011.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Redundant as part of a collective redundancy on economic grounds 06/12/2010"];
   "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Accepted redeployment leave 9 month"];
   "RE"->"Took maternity leave and childcare leave for a long period"[dir=none];
   "RE"->"Relinquish the right to a reduction from 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
   "RE"->"Left on 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

RE ползва първо отпуск по майчинство от 4 февруари до 19 август 2001 г., а след това и отпуск за отглеждане на дете от 6 септември 2001 г. до 6 септември 2003 г. По-късно тя ползва втори отпуск по майчинство от 6 ноември 2007 г. до 6 юни 2008 г., а след това, считано от 1 август 2008 г., и отпуск за отглеждане на дете под формата на намалено с една пета работно време. Последният отпуск е трябвало да приключи на 29 януари 2011 г.
На 6 декември 2010 г. RE е уволнена при колективни уволнения по икономически причини. Тя приема да ползва отпуск за преквалификация с продължителност от девет месеца.
След като, считано от 1 януари 2011 г., се отказва от намаленото работно време, на 7 септември 2011 г. RE напуска окончателно Praxair MRC.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="уволнена при колективни уволнения по икономически причини 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="приема да ползва отпуск за преквалификация с продължителност от девет месеца."];
  "RE"->"RE ползва първо отпуск по майчинство от 4 февруари до 19 август 2001 г., а след това и отпуск за отглеждане на дете от 6 септември 2001 г. до 6 септември 2003 г. По-късно тя ползва втори отпуск по майчинство от 6 ноември 2007 г. до 6 юни 2008 г., а след това, считано от 1 август 2008 г., и отпуск за отглеждане на дете под формата на намалено с една пета работно време."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"се отказва от намаленото работно време 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"напуска окончателно 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

RE čerpala od 4. února do 19. srpna 2001 první mateřskou dovolenou a od 6. září 2001 do 6. září 2003 rodičovskou dovolenou na výchovu dítěte. Následně čerpala od 6. listopadu 2007 do 6. června 2008 druhou mateřskou dovolenou, po níž od 1. srpna 2008 následovala rodičovská dovolená na výchovu dítěte, a to ve formě pracovního úvazku zkráceného o jednu pětinu. Posledně uvedená rodičovská dovolená měla být ukončena ke dni 29. ledna 2011.
Dne 6. prosince 2010 byla RE propuštěna v rámci hromadného propouštění z hospodářských důvodů. Souhlasila s rekvalifikačním volnem v délce devíti měsíců.
Poté, co si RE od 1. ledna 2011 zkrácený pracovní úvazek zrušila, dne 7. září 2011 ze společnosti Praxair MRC definitivně odešla.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="byla RE propuštěna v rámci hromadného propouštění z hospodářských důvodů 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Souhlasila s rekvalifikačním volnem v délce devíti měsíců."];
  "RE"->"RE čerpala od 4. února do 19. srpna 2001 první mateřskou dovolenou a od 6. září 2001 do 6. září 2003 rodičovskou dovolenou na výchovu dítěte. Následně čerpala od 6. listopadu 2007 do 6. června 2008 druhou mateřskou dovolenou, po níž od 1. srpna 2008 následovala rodičovská dovolená na výchovu dítěte."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"si RE od 1. ledna 2011 zkrácený pracovní úvazek zrušila 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"7. září 2011 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

RE holdt barselsorlov første gang i perioden fra den 4. februar til den 19. august 2001, efterfulgt af forældreorlov fra den 6. september 2001 til den 6. september 2003. Hun holdt herefter barselsorlov anden gang i perioden fra den 6. november 2007 til den 6. juni 2008, efterfulgt af forældreorlov fra den 1. august 2008 i form af nedsættelse af arbejdstiden med en femtedel. Denne sidstnævnte orlov skulle ophøre den 29. januar 2011.
Den 6. december 2010 blev RE afskediget af økonomiske grunde i forbindelse med en procedure om kollektiv afskedigelse. Hun accepterede en omskolingsorlov af en varighed på ni måneder.
Efter fra den 1. januar 2011 at have givet afkald på sin nedsættelse af arbejdstiden, forlod RE endegyldigt Praxair MRC den 7. september 2011.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="RE blev afskediget af økonomiske grunde i forbindelse med en procedure om kollektiv afskedigelse. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Hun accepterede en omskolingsorlov af en varighed på ni måneder."];
  "RE"->"RE holdt barselsorlov første gang i perioden fra den 4. februar til den 19. august 2001, efterfulgt af forældreorlov fra den 6. september 2001 til den 6. september 2003. Hun holdt herefter barselsorlov anden gang i perioden fra den 6. november 2007 til den 6. juni 2008, efterfulgt af forældreorlov fra den 1. august 2008 i form af nedsættelse af arbejdstiden med en femtedel."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"at have givet afkald på sin nedsættelse af arbejdstiden 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"forlod RE endegyldigt Praxair MRC den 7. september 2011. 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: German

RE nahm einen ersten Mutterschaftsurlaub im Zeitraum vom 4. Februar bis zum 19. August 2001 in Anspruch, an den sich ein Erziehungsurlaub vom 6. September 2001 bis zum 6. September 2003 anschloss. Einen zweiten Mutterschaftsurlaub nahm sie im Zeitraum vom 6. November 2007 bis zum6. Juni 2008 in Anspruch, an den sich ab 1. August 2008 ein Erziehungsurlaub in Form einer Reduzierung ihrer Arbeitszeit um ein Fünftel anschloss. Dieser Erziehungsurlaub sollte am 29. Januar 2011 enden.
Am 6. Dezember 2010 wurde RE aus wirtschaftlichen Gründen im Rahmen einer Massenentlassung gekündigt. Sie erklärte sich mit einem neunmonatigen Wiedereingliederungsurlaub einverstanden.
Mit Wirkung vom 1. Januar 2011 verzichtete RE auf die Reduzierung ihrer Arbeitszeit und verließ das Unternehmen am 7. September 2011 endgültig.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="aus wirtschaftlichen Gründen im Rahmen einer Massenentlassung gekündigt. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Sie erklärte sich mit einem neunmonatigen Wiedereingliederungsurlaub einverstanden."];
  "RE"->"RE nahm einen ersten Mutterschaftsurlaub im Zeitraum vom 4. Februar bis zum 19. August 2001 in Anspruch, an den sich ein Erziehungsurlaub vom 6. September 2001 bis zum 6. September 2003 anschloss. Einen zweiten Mutterschaftsurlaub nahm sie im Zeitraum vom 6. November 2007 bis zum6. Juni 2008 in Anspruch, an den sich ab 1. August 2008 ein Erziehungsurlaub in Form einer Reduzierung ihrer Arbeitszeit um ein Fünftel anschloss."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"Mit Wirkung vom 1. Januar 2011 verzichtete RE auf die Reduzierung ihrer Arbeitszeit 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"7. September 2011 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

RE oli esimest korda rasedus- ja sünnituspuhkusel 4. veebruarist kuni 19. augustini 2001, millele järgnes lapsehoolduspuhkus 6. septembrist 2001 kuni 6. septembrini 2003. Seejärel läks RE teist korda rasedus- ja sünnituspuhkusele 6. novembrist 2007 kuni 6. juunini 2008, millele järgnes lapsehoolduspuhkus alates 1. augustist 2008, mis oli korraldatud tema tööaja viiendiku võrra vähendamise teel. Lapsehoolduspuhkus pidi lõppema 29. jaanuaril 2011.
RE koondati 6. detsembril 2010 majanduslikel põhjustel toimunud koondamise raames. Ta nõustus võtma üheksakuulise ümberpaigutamispuhkuse.
Alates 1. jaanuarist 2011 loobus RE oma tööaja vähendamisest ja lahkus Praxair MRCst lõplikult 7. septembril 2011.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="RE koondati 6. detsembril 2010 majanduslikel põhjustel toimunud koondamise raames. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="nõustus võtma üheksakuulise ümberpaigutamispuhkuse."];
  "RE"->"RE oli esimest korda rasedus- ja sünnituspuhkusel 4. veebruarist kuni 19. augustini 2001, millele järgnes lapsehoolduspuhkus 6. septembrist 2001 kuni 6. septembrini 2003. Seejärel läks RE teist korda rasedus- ja sünnituspuhkusele 6. novembrist 2007 kuni 6. juunini 2008, millele järgnes lapsehoolduspuhkus alates 1. augustist 2008"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"Alates 1. jaanuarist 2011 loobus RE oma tööaja vähendamisest 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"lahkus 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Η RE έλαβε αρχικώς άδεια μητρότητας από τις 4 Φεβρουαρίου 2001 έως τις 19 Αυγούστου 2001 και, κατόπιν, γονική άδεια ανατροφής τέκνου από τις 6 Σεπτεμβρίου 2001 έως τις 6 Σεπτεμβρίου 2003. Εν συνεχεία, έλαβε δεύτερη άδεια μητρότητας από τις 6 Νοεμβρίου 2007 έως τις 6 Ιουνίου 2008 και, κατόπιν, γονική άδεια ανατροφής τέκνου από την 1η Αυγούστου 2008, υπό μορφή μείωσης του χρόνου εργασίας κατά το ένα πέμπτο. Η άδεια αυτή επρόκειτο να λήξει στις 29 Ιανουαρίου 2011.
Στις 6 Δεκεμβρίου 2010, η RE απολύθηκε στο πλαίσιο διαδικασίας ομαδικών απολύσεων για οικονομικούς λόγους. Δέχθηκε να λάβει άδεια επανένταξης διάρκειας εννέα μηνών.
Την 1η Ιανουαρίου 2011, η RE ανακάλεσε τη γονική άδεια υπό μορφή μείωσης του χρόνου εργασίας και στις 7 Σεπτεμβρίου 2011 αποχώρησε οριστικά από την Praxair MRC.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="απολύθηκε στο πλαίσιο διαδικασίας ομαδικών απολύσεων για οικονομικούς λόγους 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Δέχθηκε να λάβει άδεια επανένταξης διάρκειας εννέα μηνών."];
  "RE"->"Η RE έλαβε αρχικώς άδεια μητρότητας από τις 4 Φεβρουαρίου 2001 έως τις 19 Αυγούστου 2001 και, κατόπιν, γονική άδεια ανατροφής τέκνου από τις 6 Σεπτεμβρίου 2001 έως τις 6 Σεπτεμβρίου 2003. Εν συνεχεία, έλαβε δεύτερη άδεια μητρότητας από τις 6 Νοεμβρίου 2007 έως τις 6 Ιουνίου 2008 και, κατόπιν, γονική άδεια ανατροφής τέκνου από την 1η Αυγούστου 2008,"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"η RE ανακάλεσε τη γονική άδεια υπό μορφή μείωσης του χρόνου εργασίας 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"7 Σεπτεμβρίου 2011 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: French

RE a bénéficié d’un premier congé de maternité, pour la période allant du 4 février au 19 août 2001, suivi par un congé parental d’éducation, allant du 6 septembre 2001 au 6 septembre 2003. Elle a ensuite bénéficié d’un second congé de maternité, pour la période allant du 6 novembre 2007 au 6 juin 2008, suivi d’un congé parental d’éducation à compter du 1er août 2008, sous la forme d’une réduction d’un cinquième du temps de travail. Ce dernier congé devait se terminer le 29 janvier 2011.
Le 6 décembre 2010, RE a été licenciée dans le cadre d’une procédure de licenciement collectif pour motif économique. Elle a accepté un congé de reclassement d’une durée de neuf mois.
Après avoir renoncé à compter du 1er janvier 2011 à la réduction de son temps de travail, RE a quitté définitivement Praxair MRC le 7 septembre 2011.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="licenciée dans le cadre d’une procédure de licenciement collectif pour motif économique 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Elle a accepté un congé de reclassement d’une durée de neuf mois."];
  "RE"->"RE a bénéficié d’un premier congé de maternité, pour la période allant du 4 février au 19 août 2001, suivi par un congé parental d’éducation, allant du 6 septembre 2001 au 6 septembre 2003. Elle a ensuite bénéficié d’un second congé de maternité, pour la période allant du 6 novembre 2007 au 6 juin 2008, suivi d’un congé parental d’éducation à compter du 1er août 2008, sous la forme d’une réduction d’un cinquième du temps de travail."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"Après avoir renoncé à compter du 1er janvier 2011 à la réduction de son temps de travail 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"a quitté définitivement Praxair MRC le 7 septembre 2011. 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}