mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fit-30 ta’ Settembru 2011, RE adixxiet lill-Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (il-Qorti Industrijali ta’ Toulouse, Franza) sabiex tikkontesta t-tkeċċija tagħha u billi għamlet diversi talbiet, b’mod partikolari għall-ħlas tas-somom ta’ EUR 941.15, bħala ħlas b’lura tal-allowance ta’ tkeċċija, u ta’ EUR 1 423.79, bħala ħlas b’lura tal-allowance ta’ leave ta’ klassifikazzjoni mill-ġdid.
B’sentenza tat-12 ta’ Settembru 2013, din il-qorti ċaħdet dawn iż-żewġ talbiet ta’ RE.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (il-Qorti Industrijali ta’ Toulouse, Franza)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (il-Qorti Industrijali ta’ Toulouse, Franza)"->"sentenza 12/09/2013";
  "sentenza 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "sentenza 12/09/2013"->"ċaħdet dawn iż-żewġ talbiet ta’ RE."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 30 september 2011 heeft RE zich tot de conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbeidsrechter Toulouse, Frankrijk) gewend om haar ontslag aan te vechten en verschillende verzoeken in te dienen, met name tot betaling van een achterstallige ontslagvergoeding van 941,15 EUR en van een achterstallige re‑integratieverlofuitkering van 1423,79 EUR.
Bij vonnis van 12 september 2013 heeft die rechter de twee verzoeken van RE afgewezen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbeidsrechter Toulouse, Frankrijk)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbeidsrechter Toulouse, Frankrijk)"->"vonnis 12/09/2013";
  "vonnis 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "vonnis 12/09/2013"->"heeft die rechter de twee verzoeken van RE afgewezen."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 30 września 2011 r. RE wniosła powództwo do conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (sądu pracy w Tuluzie, Francja), kwestionując zwolnienie i zgłaszając różne roszczenia, w szczególności roszczenie o zapłatę kwoty 941,15 EUR tytułem zaległej odprawy z tytułu rozwiązania stosunku pracy oraz kwoty 1423,79 EUR tytułem zaległego zasiłku wypłacanego w związku z urlopem na przekwalifikowanie.
Wyrokiem sądu pracy w Tuluzie z dnia 12 września 2013 r. obydwa roszczenia RE zostały oddalone.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (sądu pracy w Tuluzie, Francja)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (sądu pracy w Tuluzie, Francja)"->"Wyrokiem sądu pracy w Tuluzie z dnia 12 września 2013 r. obydwa roszczenia RE zostały oddalone. 12/09/2013";
  "Wyrokiem sądu pracy w Tuluzie z dnia 12 września 2013 r. obydwa roszczenia RE zostały oddalone. 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "Wyrokiem sądu pracy w Tuluzie z dnia 12 września 2013 r. obydwa roszczenia RE zostały oddalone. 12/09/2013"->"obydwa roszczenia RE zostały oddalone."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 30 de setembro de 2011, RE recorreu ao conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal do Trabalho de Toulouse, França) para impugnar o seu despedimento e apresentar diversos pedidos, nomeadamente o pagamento dos montantes de 941,15 euros a título de complemento da indemnização por despedimento, e de 1423,79 euros, a título de complemento do subsídio de licença de requalificação.
Por Sentença de 12 de setembro de 2013, aquele órgão jurisdicional julgou improcedentes estes dois pedidos de RE.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal do Trabalho de Toulouse, França)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal do Trabalho de Toulouse, França)"->"Sentença 12/09/2013";
  "Sentença 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "Sentença 12/09/2013"->"julgou improcedentes estes dois pedidos de RE."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 30 septembrie 2011, RE a sesizat conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunalul Muncii din Toulouse, Franța) pentru a contesta concedierea sa, formulând diverse cereri, printre care și una de plată a sumei de 941,15 euro, cu titlu de indemnizație restantă de concediere, și a sumei de 1423,79 euro, cu titlu de alocație restantă pentru concediul de reorientare profesională.
Prin hotărârea din 12 septembrie 2013, această instanță a respins aceste două cereri ale RE.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunalul Muncii din Toulouse, Franța)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunalul Muncii din Toulouse, Franța)"->"hotărârea din 12 septembrie 2013 12/09/2013";
  "hotărârea din 12 septembrie 2013 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "hotărârea din 12 septembrie 2013 12/09/2013"->"a respins aceste două cereri ale RE."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

RE sa 30. septembra 2011 obrátila na Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Pracovný súd Toulouse, Francúzsko), pričom spochybnila svoje prepustenie a podala viacero návrhov, a to najmä na zaplatenie sumy 941,15 eura ako doplatku k odstupnému a 1423,79 eura ako dodatočného príspevku počas prípravného rekvalifikačného voľna.
Rozsudkom z 12. septembra 2013 uvedený súd zamietol tieto dva návrhy RE.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Pracovný súd Toulouse, Francúzsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Pracovný súd Toulouse, Francúzsko)"->"Rozsudkom z 12. septembra 2013 12/09/2013";
  "Rozsudkom z 12. septembra 2013 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "Rozsudkom z 12. septembra 2013 12/09/2013"->"zamietol tieto dva návrhy RE."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

RE je 30. septembra 2011 vložila tožbo pri conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (delovno sodišče v Toulousu, Francija), s katero je izpodbijala odpoved pogodbe o zaposlitvi ter vložila več zahtevkov, med drugim za plačilo zneska v višini 941,15 EUR iz naslova neplačane odpravnine in zneska v višini 1423,79 EUR iz naslova neplačanega nadomestila za prezaposlovanje.
To sodišče je s sodbo z dne 12. septembra 2013 oba navedena zahtevka RE zavrnilo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (delovno sodišče v Toulousu, Francija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (delovno sodišče v Toulousu, Francija)"->"sodbo 12/09/2013";
  "sodbo 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "sodbo 12/09/2013"->"oba navedena zahtevka RE zavrnilo."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

RE nosti 30.9.2011 conseil de prud’hommes de Toulousessa (Toulousen työtuomioistuin, Ranska) kanteen, jolla hän riitautti irtisanomisensa ja esitti kahdeksan erilaista vaatimusta, jotka koskivat muun muassa 941,15 euron maksamista maksamattomana irtisanomiskorvauksena ja 1423,79 euron maksamista maksamattomana uudelleentyöllistymisvapaalta maksettavana avustuksena.
Mainittu tuomioistuin hylkäsi nämä kaksi RE:n vaatimusta 12.9.2013 antamallaan tuomiolla.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Toulousen työtuomioistuin, Ranska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Toulousen työtuomioistuin, Ranska)"->"12.9.2013 antamallaan tuomiolla. 12/09/2013";
  "12.9.2013 antamallaan tuomiolla. 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "12.9.2013 antamallaan tuomiolla. 12/09/2013"->"Hylkäsi nämä kaksi RE:n vaatimusta"[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Den 30 september 2011 väckte hon talan vid conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbetsdomstolen i Toulouse, Frankrike) varvid hon bestred uppsägningen och framställde olika yrkanden, bland annat om ersättning med 941,15 euro för uteblivet avgångsvederlag och 1423,79 euro för uteblivet omskolningsbidrag.
Genom dom av den 12 september 2013 avslog nämnda domstol dessa två av RE:s yrkanden.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbetsdomstolen i Toulouse, Frankrike)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbetsdomstolen i Toulouse, Frankrike)"->"dom av den 12 september 2013 12/09/2013";
  "dom av den 12 september 2013 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "dom av den 12 september 2013 12/09/2013"->"avslog nämnda domstol dessa två av RE:s yrkanden."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: English

By judgment of 12 September 2013, that court dismissed RE’s two claims.
By judgment of 14 October 2016, the cour d’appel de Toulouse (Court of Appeal, Toulouse, France) upheld the dismissal of those claims by RE before the conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Labour Tribunal, Toulouse).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Labour Tribunal, Toulouse, France)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The cour d’appel de Toulouse (Court of Appeal, Toulouse, France)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "The conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Labour Tribunal, Toulouse, France)"->"Judgement 12/09/2013";
   "Judgement 12/09/2013"->"RE";
   "Judgement 12/09/2013"->"Dismiss 2 claims"[dir=none];
   "The cour d’appel de Toulouse (Court of Appeal, Toulouse, France)"->"Judgement 14/10/2016";
   "Judgement 14/10/2016"->"RE";
   "Judgement 14/10/2016"->"Upheld the dismissal of those claims by RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

С решение от 14 октомври 2016 г. Cour d’appel de Toulouse (Апелативен съд Тулуза, Франция) потвърждава решението на Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза) за отхвърляне на исканията на RE.
На 14 декември 2016 г. RE подава касационна жалба срещу решението, като твърди, че Cour d’appel de Toulouse (Апелативен съд Тулуза) е нарушил клауза 2, точка 6 от Рамковото споразумение за родителския отпуск.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза, Франция)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Апелативен съд Тулуза, Франция)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза, Франция)"->"решение 12/09/2013";
  "решение 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "решение 12/09/2013"->"отхвърляне на исканията"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Апелативен съд Тулуза, Франция)"->"решение 14/10/2016";
  "решение 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "решение 14/10/2016"->"потвърждава решението на Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза) за отхвърляне на исканията на RE. RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Mediante sentencia de 14 de octubre de 2016, la cour d’appel de Toulouse (Tribunal de Apelación de Toulouse, Francia) confirmó la desestimación de las pretensiones formuladas por RE ante el conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal Laboral Paritario de Toulouse).
El 14 de diciembre de 2016, RE interpuso un recurso de casación contra dicha sentencia, alegando que la cour d’appel de Toulouse (Tribunal de Apelación de Toulouse) había infringido la cláusula 2, apartado 6, del Acuerdo Marco sobre el permiso parental.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal Laboral Paritario de Toulouse, Francia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Tribunal de Apelación de Toulouse, Francia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal Laboral Paritario de Toulouse, Francia)"->"sentencia 12/09/2013";
  "sentencia 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "sentencia 12/09/2013"->"confirmó la desestimación de las pretensiones formuladas"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Tribunal de Apelación de Toulouse, Francia)"->"sentencia 14/10/2016";
  "sentencia 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "sentencia 14/10/2016"->"confirmó la desestimación de las pretensiones formuladas por RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Rozsudkem ze dne 14. října 2016 cour d’appel de Toulouse (odvolací soud v Toulouse, Francie) rozhodnutí o zamítnutí uvedených návrhů, které podala RE u conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (pracovní soud v Toulouse), potvrdil.
Dne 14. prosince 2016 podala RE proti uvedenému rozsudku kasační opravný prostředek, přičemž tvrdila, že cour d’appel de Toulouse (odvolací soud v Toulouse) porušil ustanovení 2 bod 6 rámcové dohody o rodičovské dovolené.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (pracovní soud v Toulouse, Francie)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (odvolací soud v Toulouse, Francie)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (pracovní soud v Toulouse, Francie)"->"Rozsudkem 12/09/2013";
  "Rozsudkem 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "Rozsudkem 12/09/2013"->"rozhodnutí o zamítnutí uvedených návrhů"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (odvolací soud v Toulouse, Francie)"->"Rozsudkem 14/10/2016";
  "Rozsudkem 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "Rozsudkem 14/10/2016"->"rozhodnutí o zamítnutí uvedených návrhů, potvrdil. RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Ved dom af 14. oktober 2016 stadfæstede cour d’appel de Toulouse (appeldomstolen i Toulouse, Frankrig) frifindelsen med hensyn til de nævnte påstande, som RE havde nedlagt ved conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbejdsretten i Toulouse).
Den 14. december 2016 iværksatte RE kassationsanke til prøvelse af den nævnte dom, idet hun gjorde gældende, at cour d’appel de Toulouse (appeldomstolen i Toulouse) havde tilsidesat § 2, stk. 6, i rammeaftalen vedrørende forældreorlov.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbejdsretten i Toulouse, Frankrig)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (appeldomstolen i Toulouse, Frankrig)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbejdsretten i Toulouse, Frankrig)"->"dom af 14. oktober 2016 12/09/2013";
  "dom af 14. oktober 2016 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "dom af 14. oktober 2016 12/09/2013"->"frifindelsen med hensyn til de nævnte påstande"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (appeldomstolen i Toulouse, Frankrig)"->"dom af 14. oktober 2016 14/10/2016";
  "dom af 14. oktober 2016 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "dom af 14. oktober 2016 14/10/2016"->"ved dom af 14. oktober 2016 stadfæstede cour d’appel de Toulouse (appeldomstolen i Toulouse, Frankrig) frifindelsen med hensyn til de nævnte påstande RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: German

Mit Urteil vom 14. Oktober 2016 bestätigte die Cour d’appel de Toulouse (Berufungsgericht Toulouse, Frankreich) die Zurückweisung der von RE beim Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Arbeitsgericht Toulouse) gestellten Anträge.
Am 14. Dezember 2016 hat RE Kassationsbeschwerde gegen dieses Urteil eingelegt und geltend gemacht, die Cour d’appel de Toulouse (Berufungsgericht Toulouse) habe gegen Paragraf 2 Nr. 6 der Rahmenvereinbarung über den Elternurlaub verstoßen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Arbeitsgericht Toulouse, Frankreich)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Berufungsgericht Toulouse, Frankreich)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Arbeitsgericht Toulouse, Frankreich)"->"Urteil 12/09/2013";
  "Urteil 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "Urteil 12/09/2013"->"Zurückweisung der von RE beim Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Arbeitsgericht Toulouse) gestellten Anträge."[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Berufungsgericht Toulouse, Frankreich)"->"Urteil 14/10/2016";
  "Urteil 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "Urteil 14/10/2016"->"bestätigte die Zurückweisung der von RE gestellten Anträge RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Cour d’appel de Toulouse (Toulouse’i apellatsioonikohus, Prantsusmaa) jättis 14. oktoobri 2016. aasta otsusega Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse’ile RE esitatud nõuete rahuldamata jätmise otsuse muutmata.
RE esitas 14. detsembril 2016 selle kohtuotsuse peale kassatsioonkaebuse, väites, et Cour d’appel de Toulouse (Toulouse’i apellatsioonikohus) rikkus lapsehoolduspuhkuse raamkokkuleppe klausli 2 punkti 6.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Toulouse’i apellatsioonikohus, Prantsusmaa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse)"->"kohtuotsuse 12/09/2013";
  "kohtuotsuse 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "kohtuotsuse 12/09/2013"->"nõuete rahuldamata jätmise otsuse muutmata."[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Toulouse’i apellatsioonikohus, Prantsusmaa)"->"kohtuotsuse 14/10/2016";
  "kohtuotsuse 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "kohtuotsuse 14/10/2016"->"RE esitatud nõuete rahuldamata jätmise otsuse muutmata. RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Με απόφαση της 14ης Οκτωβρίου 2016, το cour d’appel de Toulouse (εφετείο Τουλούζης, Γαλλία) επικύρωσε την απόρριψη των εν λόγω αιτημάτων που είχε προβάλει η RE ενώπιον του conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (δικαστηρίου εργατικών διαφορών Τουλούζης).
Στις 14 Δεκεμβρίου 2016, η RE άσκησε αναίρεση κατά της εν λόγω απόφασης, υποστηρίζοντας ότι το cour d’appel de Toulouse (εφετείο Τουλούζης) είχε παραβεί τη ρήτρα 2, σημείο 6, της συμφωνίας‑πλαισίου για τη γονική άδεια.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (δικαστηρίου εργατικών διαφορών Τουλούζης, Γαλλία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (εφετείο Τουλούζης, Γαλλία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (δικαστηρίου εργατικών διαφορών Τουλούζης, Γαλλία)"->"απόφαση 12/09/2013";
  "απόφαση 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "απόφαση 12/09/2013"->"απόρριψη των εν λόγω αιτημάτων"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (εφετείο Τουλούζης, Γαλλία)"->"απόφαση 14/10/2016";
  "απόφαση 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "απόφαση 14/10/2016"->"επικύρωσε την απόρριψη των εν λόγω αιτημάτων RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: French

Par arrêt du 14 octobre 2016, la cour d’appel de Toulouse (France) a confirmé le rejet desdites demandes formées par RE devant le conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse.
Le 14 décembre 2016, RE a formé un pourvoi en cassation contre ledit arrêt, en soutenant que la cour d’appel de Toulouse avait violé la clause 2, point 6, de l’accord-cadre sur le congé parental.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (France))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (la cour d’appel de Toulouse (France))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (France))"->"arrêt 12/09/2013";
  "arrêt 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "arrêt 12/09/2013"->"confirmé le rejet desdites demandes"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (la cour d’appel de Toulouse (France))"->"arrêt 14/10/2016";
  "arrêt 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "arrêt 14/10/2016"->"a confirmé le rejet desdites demandes formées par RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Presudom od 14. listopada 2016. cour d’appel de Toulouse (Žalbeni sud u Toulouseu, Francuska) potvrdio je odbijanje navedenih zahtjeva koje je osoba RE podnijela conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Radni sud u Toulouseu).
Osoba RE je 14. prosinca 2016. protiv navedene presude podnijela žalbu u kasacijskom postupku tvrdeći da je cour d’appel de Toulouse (Žalbeni sud u Toulouseu) povrijedio klauzulu 2. točku 6. Okvirnog sporazuma o roditeljskom dopustu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Radni sud u Toulouseu, Francuska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Žalbeni sud u Toulouseu, Francuska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Radni sud u Toulouseu, Francuska)"->"Presudom od 14. listopada 2016. 12/09/2013";
  "Presudom od 14. listopada 2016. 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "Presudom od 14. listopada 2016. 12/09/2013"->"odbijanje navedenih zahtjeva"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Žalbeni sud u Toulouseu, Francuska)"->"Presudom od 14. listopada 2016. 14/10/2016";
  "Presudom od 14. listopada 2016. 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "Presudom od 14. listopada 2016. 14/10/2016"->"potvrdio je odbijanje navedenih zahtjeva koje RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Con sentenza del 14 ottobre 2016, la cour d’appel de Toulouse (Corte d’appello di Tolosa, Francia) ha confermato il rigetto di dette domande proposte da RE dinanzi al conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunale del lavoro di Tolosa).
Il 14 dicembre 2016, RE ha proposto ricorso in cassazione avverso detta sentenza, sostenendo che la cour d’appel de Toulouse (Corte d’appello di Tolosa) aveva violato la clausola 2, punto 6, dell’accordo quadro sul congedo parentale.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunale del lavoro di Tolosa, Francia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Corte d’appello di Tolosa, Francia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunale del lavoro di Tolosa, Francia)"->"sentenza 12/09/2013";
  "sentenza 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "sentenza 12/09/2013"->"rigetto di dette domande"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Corte d’appello di Tolosa, Francia)"->"sentenza 14/10/2016";
  "sentenza 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "sentenza 14/10/2016"->"ha confermato il rigetto di dette domande RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Ar 2016. gada 14. oktobra spriedumu cour d’appel de Toulouse [Tulūzas apelācijas tiesa] (Francija) atstāja negrozītu conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse nolēmumu, ar kuru noraidīti attiecīgie RE prasījumi.
2016. gada 14. decembrī RE iesniedza kasācijas sūdzību par šo spriedumu, apgalvojot, ka cour d’appel de Toulouse esot pārkāpusi pamatnolīguma par bērna kopšanas atvaļinājumu 2. noteikuma 6. punktu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (cour d’appel de Toulouse [Tulūzas apelācijas tiesa] (Francija))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (cour d’appel de Toulouse [Tulūzas apelācijas tiesa] (Francija))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (cour d’appel de Toulouse [Tulūzas apelācijas tiesa] (Francija))"->"spriedumu 12/09/2013";
  "spriedumu 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "spriedumu 12/09/2013"->"noraidīti attiecīgie RE prasījumi"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (cour d’appel de Toulouse [Tulūzas apelācijas tiesa] (Francija))"->"spriedumu 14/10/2016";
  "spriedumu 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "spriedumu 14/10/2016"->"atsāja negrozītu conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse nolēmumu, ar kuru noraidīti attiecīgie RE prasījumi. RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2016 m. spalio 14 d. sprendimu cour d’appel de Toulouse (Tulūzos apeliacinis teismas, Prancūzija) patvirtino šių RE prašymų, pateiktų conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas), atmetimą.
2016 m. gruodžio 14 d. RE pateikė kasacinį skundą dėl minėto sprendimo, teigdama, kad cour d’appel de Toulouse (Tulūzos apeliacinis teismas) pažeidė Bendrojo susitarimo dėl vaiko priežiūros atostogų 2 straipsnio 6 dalį.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Tulūzos apeliacinis teismas, Prancūzija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas)"->"sprendimu 12/09/2013";
  "sprendimu 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "sprendimu 12/09/2013"->"atmetimą"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (Tulūzos apeliacinis teismas, Prancūzija)"->"sprendimu 14/10/2016";
  "sprendimu 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "sprendimu 14/10/2016"->"patvirtino šių RE prašymų, pateiktų conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas), atmetimą. RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

A 2016. október 14‑i ítéletével a cour d’appel de Toulouse (toulouse‑i fellebbviteli bíróság, Franciaország) helybenhagyta az RE által a conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (toulouse‑i munkaügyi bíróság) elé terjesztett említett kérelmek elutasítását.
2016. december 14‑én RE felülvizsgálati kérelmet terjesztett elő az említett ítélettel szemben, azt állítva, hogy a cour d’appel de Toulouse (toulouse‑i fellebbviteli bíróság) megsértette a szülői szabadságról szóló keretmegállapodás 2. szakaszának 6. pontját.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (toulouse-i munkaügyi bíróság, Franciaország)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (toulouse‑i fellebbviteli bíróság, Franciaország)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (toulouse-i munkaügyi bíróság, Franciaország)"->"2016. október 14‑i ítéletével 12/09/2013";
  "2016. október 14‑i ítéletével 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "2016. október 14‑i ítéletével 12/09/2013"->"elutasítását"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (toulouse‑i fellebbviteli bíróság, Franciaország)"->"2016. október 14‑i ítéletével 14/10/2016";
  "2016. október 14‑i ítéletével 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "2016. október 14‑i ítéletével 14/10/2016"->"helybenhagyta az RE által a conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (toulouse‑i munkaügyi bíróság) elé terjesztett említett kérelmek elutasítását. RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

B’sentenza tal-14 ta’ Ottubru 2016, il-Cour d’appel de Toulouse (il-Qorti tal-Appell ta’ Toulouse, Franza) ikkonfermat iċ-ċaħda tal-imsemmija talbiet magħmula minn RE quddiem il-conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (il-Qorti Industrijali ta’ Toulouse).
Fl-14 ta’ Diċembru 2016, RE ppreżentat appell ta’ kassazzjoni mill-imsemmija sentenza, billi sostniet li l-cour d’appel de Toulouse (il-Qorti tal-Appell ta’ Toulouse) kienet kisret il-punt 6 tal-Klawżola 2 tal-Ftehim qafas dwar il-leave parentali.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (il-Qorti Industrijali ta’ Toulouse, Franza)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (il-Qorti tal-Appell ta’ Toulouse, Franza)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (il-Qorti Industrijali ta’ Toulouse, Franza)"->"sentenza 12/09/2013";
  "sentenza 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "sentenza 12/09/2013"->"ikkonfermat iċ-ċaħda tal-imsemmija talbiet"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (il-Qorti tal-Appell ta’ Toulouse, Franza)"->"sentenza 14/10/2016";
  "sentenza 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "sentenza 14/10/2016"->"ikkonfermat iċ-ċaħda tal-imsemmija talbiet magħmula minn RE RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Bij arrest van 14 oktober 2016 heeft de cour d’appel de Toulouse (rechter in tweede aanleg Toulouse, Frankrijk) de afwijzing van de door RE bij de conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse ingediende verzoeken bevestigd.
Op 14 december 2016 heeft RE cassatieberoep ingesteld tegen dat arrest, op grond dat de cour d’appel de Toulouse clausule 2, punt 6, van de raamovereenkomst inzake ouderschapsverlof had geschonden.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (rechter in tweede aanleg Toulouse, Frankrijk)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (cour d’appel de Toulouse)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (rechter in tweede aanleg Toulouse, Frankrijk)"->"arrest van 14 oktober 2016 12/09/2013";
  "arrest van 14 oktober 2016 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "arrest van 14 oktober 2016 12/09/2013"->"de afwijzing van de door RE bij de conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse ingediende verzoeken bevestigd."[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (cour d’appel de Toulouse)"->"arrest van 14 oktober 2016 14/10/2016";
  "arrest van 14 oktober 2016 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "arrest van 14 oktober 2016 14/10/2016"->"de afwijzing van de door RE bij de conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse ingediende verzoeken bevestigd. RE"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Wyrokiem z dnia 14 października 2016 r. cour d’appel de Toulouse (sąd apelacyjny w Tuluzie, Francja) utrzymał w mocy wyrok oddalający powództwo RE.
W dniu 14 grudnia 2016 r. RE wniosła skargę kasacyjną od tego wyroku, w której podniosła, że cour d’appel de Toulouse (sąd apelacyjny w Tuluzie) naruszył klauzulę 2 pkt 6 porozumienia ramowego dotyczącego urlopu rodzicielskiego.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (sąd apelacyjny w Tuluzie, Francja)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (sąd apelacyjny w Tuluzie, Francja)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (sąd apelacyjny w Tuluzie, Francja)"->"Wyrokiem 12/09/2013";
  "Wyrokiem 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "Wyrokiem 12/09/2013"->"wyrok oddalający powództwo RE"[dir=none];
  "cour d’appel de Toulouse (sąd apelacyjny w Tuluzie, Francja)"->"Wyrokiem 14/10/2016";
  "Wyrokiem 14/10/2016"->"RE";
  "Wyrokiem 14/10/2016"->"utrzymał w mocy wyrok oddalający powództwo RE"[dir=none];
    
}