mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Osoba RE koristila je prvi rodiljni dopust od 4. veljače do 19. kolovoza 2001., a potom roditeljski dopust za odgoj djeteta od 6. rujna 2001. do 6. rujna 2003. Zatim je koristila drugi rodiljni dopust od 6. studenoga 2007. do 6. lipnja 2008. i potom roditeljski dopust za odgoj djeteta od 1. kolovoza 2008. u obliku radnog vremena skraćenog za jednu petinu. Taj posljednji dopust trebao je isteći 29. siječnja 2011.
Osoba RE je 6. prosinca 2010. u sklopu kolektivnog otkazivanja dobila poslovno uvjetovani otkaz te je prihvatila dopust radi prekvalifikacije u trajanju od devet mjeseci.
Osoba RE je, nakon što je od 1. siječnja 2011. odustala od korištenja skraćenog radnog vremena, 7. rujna 2011. trajno napustila društvo Praxair MRC.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="6. prosinca 2010. u sklopu kolektivnog otkazivanja dobila poslovno uvjetovani otkaz 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="prihvatila dopust radi prekvalifikacije u trajanju od devet mjeseci."];
  "RE"->"Osoba RE koristila je prvi rodiljni dopust od 4. veljače do 19. kolovoza 2001., a potom roditeljski dopust za odgoj djeteta od 6. rujna 2001. do 6. rujna 2003. Zatim je koristila drugi rodiljni dopust od 6. studenoga 2007. do 6. lipnja 2008. i potom roditeljski dopust za odgoj djeteta od 1. kolovoza 2008."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"odustala od korištenja skraćenog radnog vremena 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"trajno napustila 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

RE ha beneficiato di un primo congedo di maternità per il periodo dal 4 febbraio al 19 agosto 2001, seguito da un congedo parentale per l’educazione dei figli dal 6 settembre 2001 al 6 settembre 2003. Successivamente, ha fruito di un secondo congedo di maternità per il periodo dal 6 novembre 2007 al6 giugno 2008, seguito da un congedo parentale per l’educazione dei figli a far data dal 1o agosto 2008, in forma di riduzione pari a un quinto del suo orario di lavoro. Quest’ultimo congedo doveva terminare il 29 gennaio 2011.
Il 6 dicembre 2010, RE è stata licenziata nel contesto di una procedura di licenziamento collettivo per motivi economici ed ha accettato un congedo di riqualificazione di una durata di nove mesi.
Dopo aver rinunciato alla riduzione dell’orario di lavoro a decorrere dal 1o gennaio 2011, RE ha definitivamente lasciato Praxair MRC in data 7 settembre 2011.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="RE è stata licenziata nel contesto di una procedura di licenziamento collettivo per motivi economici 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="ha accettato un congedo di riqualificazione di una durata di nove mesi."];
  "RE"->"RE ha beneficiato di un primo congedo di maternità per il periodo dal 4 febbraio al 19 agosto 2001, seguito da un congedo parentale per l’educazione dei figli dal 6 settembre 2001 al 6 settembre 2003. Successivamente, ha fruito di un secondo congedo di maternità per il periodo dal 6 novembre 2007 al6 giugno 2008, seguito da un congedo parentale per l’educazione dei figli a far data dal 1o agosto 2008."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"Dopo aver rinunciato alla riduzione dell’orario di lavoro 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"definitivamente lasciato Praxair MRC in data 7 settembre 2011. 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

RE izmantoja pirmo grūtniecības un dzemdību atvaļinājumu laikposmā no 2001. gada 4. februāra līdz 19. augustam, kam sekoja vecāku atvaļinājums mācībām no 2001. gada 6. septembra līdz 2003. gada 6. septembrim. Pēc tam viņa izmantoja otro grūtniecības un dzemdību atvaļinājumu laikposmā no 2007. gada 6. novembra līdz 2008. gada 6. jūnijam, kam sekoja vecāku atvaļinājums mācībām no 2008. gada 1. augusta, kurš izpaudās kā darba laika samazinājums par vienu piekto daļu. Šim pēdējām minētajam atvaļinājumam bija jāizbeidzas 2011. gada 29. janvārī.
2010. gada 6. decembrī RE tika atlaista no darba ekonomisku apsvērumu dēļ kolektīvas atlaišanas procedūrā. Viņa piekrita deviņu mēnešu ilgam pārkvalifikācijas atvaļinājumam.
Nepiekrītot sava darba laika samazinājumam no 2011. gada 1. janvāra, RE 2011. gada 7. septembrī pilnībā izbeidza darba attiecības ar Praxair MRC.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="2010. gada 6. decembrī RE tika atlaista no darba ekonomisku apsvērumu dēļ kolektīvas atlaišanas procedūrā. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Viņa piekrita deviņu mēnešu ilgam pārkvalifikācijas atvaļinājumam."];
  "RE"->"RE izmantoja pirmo grūtniecības un dzemdību atvaļinājumu laikposmā no 2001. gada 4. februāra līdz 19. augustam, kam sekoja vecāku atvaļinājums mācībām no 2001. gada 6. septembra līdz 2003. gada 6. septembrim. Pēc tam viņa izmantoja otro grūtniecības un dzemdību atvaļinājumu laikposmā no 2007. gada 6. novembra līdz 2008. gada 6. jūnijam, kam sekoja vecāku atvaļinājums mācībām no 2008. gada 1. augusta, kurš izpaudās kā darba laika samazinājums par vienu piekto daļu."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"sava darba laika samazinājumam 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"tika atlaista no darba 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

RE išėjo pirmųjų motinystės atostogų nuo 2001 m. vasario 4 d. iki 2001 m. rugpjūčio 19 d., vėliau – vaiko priežiūros atostogų nuo 2001 m. rugsėjo 6 d. iki 2003 m. rugsėjo 6 d. Ji antrą kartą išėjo motinystės atostogų, kurios truko nuo 2007 m. lapkričio 6 d. iki 2008 m. birželio 6 d., ir vaiko priežiūros atostogų nuo 2008 m. rugpjūčio 1 d., per kurias jai buvo taikomas darbo laiko sumažinimas 1/5 dalimi. Šios vaiko priežiūros atostogos turėjo pasibaigti 2011 m. sausio 29 d.
2010 m. gruodžio 6 d. RE buvo atleista iš darbo dėl ekonominių priežasčių, vykdant kolektyvinį atleidimą. Ji pareiškė sutinkanti su devynių mėnesių trukmės kvalifikacijos keitimo atostogomis.
Atsisakiusi, kad nuo 2011 m. sausio 1 d. jai toliau būtų taikomas darbo laiko sumažinimas, RE iš Praxair MRC galutinai išėjo 2011 m. rugsėjo 7 d.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Atleista iš darbo dėl ekonominių priežasčių, vykdant kolektyvinį atleidimą 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="sutinkanti su devynių mėnesių trukmės kvalifikacijos keitimo atostogomis."];
  "RE"->"išėjo pirmųjų motinystės atostogų nuo 2001 m. vasario 4 d. iki 2001 m. rugpjūčio 19 d., vėliau – vaiko priežiūros atostogų nuo 2001 m. rugsėjo 6 d. iki 2003 m. rugsėjo 6 d. Ji antrą kartą išėjo motinystės atostogų, kurios truko nuo 2007 m. lapkričio 6 d. iki 2008 m. birželio 6 d., ir vaiko priežiūros atostogų nuo 2008 m. rugpjūčio 1 d., per kurias jai buvo taikomas darbo laiko sumažinimas 1/5 dalimi. Šios vaiko priežiūros atostogos turėjo pasibaigti 2011 m. sausio 29 d."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"Atsisakiusi, kad nuo 2011 m. sausio 1 d. jai toliau būtų taikomas darbo laiko sumažinimas 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"išėjo 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

RE először a 2001. február 4. és augusztus 19. közötti időszakban volt szülői szabadságon, majd a 2001. szeptember 6. és 2003. szeptember 6. közötti időszakban gyermeknevelési célú szülői szabadságon volt. Ezt követően a 2007. november 6. és 2008. június 6. közötti időszakban másodszor is szülői szabadságon volt, majd 2008. augusztus 1‑jétől a gyermeknevelési célú szülői szabadságot abban a formában vette igénybe, hogy a munkaideje az egyötödével csökkent. Ez az utóbbi szabadság 2011. január 29‑én járt volna le.
RE‑t 2010. december 6‑án gazdasági okból, csoportos létszámcsökkentés keretében elbocsátották. RE kilenc hónap időtartamú átképzési szabadságban részesült.
RE 2011. január 1‑jei hatállyal lemondott a csökkentett munkaidőről, majd 2011. szeptember 7‑én véglegesen kilépett a Praxair MRC‑től.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="2010. december 6‑án gazdasági okból, csoportos létszámcsökkentés keretében elbocsátották. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="kilenc hónap időtartamú átképzési szabadságban részesült."];
  "RE"->"RE először a 2001. február 4. és augusztus 19. közötti időszakban volt szülői szabadságon, majd a 2001. szeptember 6. és 2003. szeptember 6. közötti időszakban gyermeknevelési célú szülői szabadságon volt. Ezt követően a 2007. november 6. és 2008. június 6. közötti időszakban másodszor is szülői szabadságon volt, majd 2008. augusztus 1‑jétől a gyermeknevelési célú szülői szabadságot abban a formában vette igénybe, hogy a munkaideje az egyötödével csökkent."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"RE 2011. január 1‑jei hatállyal lemondott a csökkentett munkaidőről 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"véglegesen kilépett a Praxair MRC‑től. 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

RE bbenefikat minn leave tal-maternità għall-ewwel darba, għall-perijodu bejn l‑4 ta’ Frar u d-19 ta’ Awwissu 2001, segwit minn leave parentali ta’ edukazzjoni, bejn is-6 ta’ Settembru 2001 u s-6 ta’ Settembru 2003. Imbagħad hija bbenefikat mit-tieni leave tal-maternità, għall-perijodu bejn is-6 ta’ Novembru 2007 u s-6 ta’ Ġunju 2008, segwit minn leave parentali ta’ edukazzjoni mill-1 ta’ Awwissu 2008, fil-forma ta’ tnaqqis b’wieħed mill-ħamsa tal-ħin tax-xogħol. Dan il-leave msemmi l-aħħar kellu jintemm fid-29 ta’ Jannar 2011.
Fis-6 ta’ Diċembru 2010, RE tkeċċiet fil-kuntest ta’ proċedura ta’ tkeċċija kollettiva għal raġuni ekonomika. Hija aċċettat leave ta’ klassifikazzjoni mill-ġdid ta’ tul ta’ żmien ta’ disa’ xhur.
Wara li rrinunzjat mill-1 ta’ Jannar 2011 għat-tnaqqis tal-ħin tax-xogħol tagħha, RE telqet b’mod definittiv minn Praxair MRC fis-7 ta’ Settembru 2011.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="tkeċċiet fil-kuntest ta’ proċedura ta’ tkeċċija kollettiva għal raġuni ekonomika 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="aċċettat leave ta’ klassifikazzjoni mill-ġdid ta’ tul ta’ żmien ta’ disa’ xhur."];
  "RE"->"bbenefikat minn leave tal-maternità għall-ewwel darba, għall-perijodu bejn l‑4 ta’ Frar u d-19 ta’ Awwissu 2001, segwit minn leave parentali ta’ edukazzjoni, bejn is-6 ta’ Settembru 2001 u s-6 ta’ Settembru 2003. Imbagħad hija bbenefikat mit-tieni leave tal-maternità, għall-perijodu bejn is-6 ta’ Novembru 2007 u s-6 ta’ Ġunju 2008, segwit minn leave parentali ta’ edukazzjoni mill-1 ta’ Awwissu 2008, fil-forma ta’ tnaqqis b’wieħed mill-ħamsa tal-ħin tax-xogħol."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"Wara li rrinunzjat mill-1 ta’ Jannar 2011 għat-tnaqqis tal-ħin tax-xogħol tagħha 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"telqet b’mod definittiv minn Praxair MRC fis-7 ta’ Settembru 2011. 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Na een eerste zwangerschaps‑ en bevallingsverlof van 4 februari 2001 tot en met 19 augustus 2001, gevolgd door ouderschapsverlof van 6 september 2001 tot en met 6 september 2003, heeft RE voor een tweede keer zwangerschaps‑ en bevallingsverlof opgenomen van 6 november 2007 tot en met 6 juni 2008, gevolgd door ouderschapsverlof vanaf 1 augustus 2008 in de vorm van arbeidstijdverkorting met een vijfde. Laatstgenoemd verlof zou normaal eindigen op 29 januari 2011.
Op 6 december 2010 is RE in het kader van een collectieve ontslagprocedure ontslagen om economische redenen. Zij heeft ingestemd met negen maanden re‑integratieverlof.
Vanaf 1 januari 2011 heeft RE afgezien van de verkorting van haar arbeidstijd, en op 7 september 2011 heeft zij Praxair MRC definitief verlaten.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="ontslagen om economische redenen 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Zij heeft ingestemd met negen maanden re‑integratieverlof."];
  "RE"->"Na een eerste zwangerschaps‑ en bevallingsverlof van 4 februari 2001 tot en met 19 augustus 2001, gevolgd door ouderschapsverlof van 6 september 2001 tot en met 6 september 2003, heeft RE voor een tweede keer zwangerschaps‑ en bevallingsverlof opgenomen van 6 november 2007 tot en met 6 juni 2008, gevolgd door ouderschapsverlof vanaf 1 augustus 2008"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"afgezien van de verkorting van haar arbeidstijd 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"7 september 2011 heeft zij Praxair MRC definitief verlaten. 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W okresie od 4 lutego do 19 sierpnia 2001 r. RE przebywała na pierwszym urlopie macierzyńskim, a następnie w okresie od 6 września 2001 r. do 6 września 2003 r. na urlopie rodzicielskim. Później RE skorzystała z kolejnego urlopu macierzyńskiego w okresie od 6 listopada 2007 r. do 6 czerwca 2008 r., po czym od dnia 1 sierpnia 2008 r. przebywała na urlopie rodzicielskim, który łączyła ze świadczeniem pracy w obniżonym o jedną piątą wymiarze czasu pracy. Ten ostatni urlop miał zakończyć się w dniu 29 stycznia 2011 r.
W dniu 6 grudnia 2010 r. RE została zwolniona z przyczyn ekonomicznych, w ramach zwolnień grupowych. Zgodziła się na skorzystanie z dziewięciomiesięcznego urlopu na przekwalifikowanie.
Począwszy od dnia 1 stycznia 2011 r. RE zrezygnowała z obniżenia wymiaru czasu pracy, a w dniu 7 września 2011 r. jej stosunek pracy z Praxair MRC uległ ostatecznie rozwiązaniu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="została zwolniona z przyczyn ekonomicznych, w ramach zwolnień grupowych. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Zgodziła się na skorzystanie z dziewięciomiesięcznego urlopu na przekwalifikowanie."];
  "RE"->"W okresie od 4 lutego do 19 sierpnia 2001 r. RE przebywała na pierwszym urlopie macierzyńskim, a następnie w okresie od 6 września 2001 r. do 6 września 2003 r. na urlopie rodzicielskim. Później RE skorzystała z kolejnego urlopu macierzyńskiego w okresie od 6 listopada 2007 r. do 6 czerwca 2008 r., po czym od dnia 1 sierpnia 2008 r. przebywała na urlopie rodzicielskim."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"zrezygnowała z obniżenia wymiaru czasu pracy 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"zrezygnowała z 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

RE gozou uma primeira licença de maternidade, pelo período entre 4 de fevereiro e 19 de agosto de 2001, seguida de uma licença parental para assistência aos filhos, entre 6 de setembro de 2001 e 6 de setembro de 2003. Em seguida, gozou uma segunda licença de maternidade, entre 6 de novembro de 2007 e 6 de junho de 2008, seguida de uma licença parental para assistência aos filhos a partir de 1 de agosto de 2008, sob a forma de redução de um quinto do tempo de trabalho. Esta última licença devia terminar em 29 de janeiro de 2011.
Em 6 de dezembro de 2010, RE foi despedida no âmbito de um processo de despedimento coletivo por motivos económicos. Aceitou uma licença de requalificação com uma duração de nove meses.
Após ter renunciado à redução do tempo de trabalho a partir de 1 de janeiro de 2011, RE deixou definitivamente a Praxair MRC em 7 de setembro de 2011.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Despedida no âmbito de um processo de despedimento coletivo por motivos económicos 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Aceitou uma licença de requalificação com uma duração de nove meses."];
  "RE"->"RE gozou uma primeira licença de maternidade, pelo período entre 4 de fevereiro e 19 de agosto de 2001, seguida de uma licença parental para assistência aos filhos, entre 6 de setembro de 2001 e 6 de setembro de 2003. Em seguida, gozou uma segunda licença de maternidade, entre 6 de novembro de 2007 e 6 de junho de 2008, seguida de uma licença parental para assistência aos filhos a partir de 1 de agosto de 2008, sob a forma de redução de um quinto do tempo de trabalho. Esta última licença devia terminar em 29 de janeiro de 2011."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"ter renunciado à redução do tempo de trabalho a partir de 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"deixou definitivamente a Praxair MRC em 7 de setembro de 2011. 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

RE a beneficiat de un prim concediu de maternitate pentru perioada cuprinsă între 4 februarie și 19 august 2001, urmat de un concediu pentru creșterea copilului de la 6 septembrie 2001 până la 6 septembrie 2003. În continuare, ea a beneficiat de un al doilea concediu de maternitate pentru perioada cuprinsă între 6 noiembrie 2007 și 6 iunie 2008, urmat de un concediu pentru creșterea copilului începând cu 1 august 2008, sub forma unei reduceri cu o cincime a timpului de lucru. Acest din urmă concediu trebuia să se încheie la 29 ianuarie 2011.
La 6 decembrie 2010, RE a fost concediată în cadrul unei proceduri de concediere colectivă pentru motive economice. Ea a acceptat un concediu de reorientare profesională cu o durată de nouă luni.
După ce a renunțat, începând cu 1 ianuarie 2011, la reducerea timpului său de muncă, RE a părăsit definitiv Praxair MRC la 7 septembrie 2011.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="a fost concediată în cadrul unei proceduri de concediere colectivă pentru motive economice. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="a acceptat un concediu de reorientare profesională cu o durată de nouă luni."];
  "RE"->"RE a beneficiat de un prim concediu de maternitate pentru perioada cuprinsă între 4 februarie și 19 august 2001, urmat de un concediu pentru creșterea copilului de la 6 septembrie 2001 până la 6 septembrie 2003. În continuare, ea a beneficiat de un al doilea concediu de maternitate pentru perioada cuprinsă între 6 noiembrie 2007 și 6 iunie 2008, urmat de un concediu pentru creșterea copilului începând cu 1 august 2008."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"După ce a renunțat, începând cu 1 ianuarie 2011, la reducerea timpului său de muncă 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"a părăsit definitiv Praxair MRC la 7 septembrie 2011. 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

RE čerpala od 4. februára do 19. augusta 2001 prvú materskú dovolenku a od 6. septembra 2001 do 6. septembra 2003 rodičovskú dovolenku na výchovu dieťaťa. Následne od 6. novembra 2007 do 6. júna 2008 čerpala druhú materskú dovolenku, po ktorej nasledovala rodičovská dovolenka na výchovu dieťaťa od 1. augusta 2008, a to vo forme zníženia pracovného úväzku o jednu pätinu. Táto posledná uvedená rodičovská dovolenka mala byť ukončená 29. januára 2011.
Dňa 6. decembra 2010 bola RE prepustená v rámci hromadného prepúšťania z ekonomických dôvodov. Súhlasila s prípravným rekvalifikačným voľnom v dĺžke deväť mesiacov.
RE po tom, čo odmietla skrátenie svojho pracovného času od 1. januára 2011, definitívne odišla 7. septembra 2011 zo spoločnosti Praxair MRC.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Dňa 6. decembra 2010 bola RE prepustená v rámci hromadného prepúšťania z ekonomických dôvodov. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Súhlasila s prípravným rekvalifikačným voľnom v dĺžke deväť mesiacov."];
  "RE"->"RE čerpala od 4. februára do 19. augusta 2001 prvú materskú dovolenku a od 6. septembra 2001 do 6. septembra 2003 rodičovskú dovolenku na výchovu dieťaťa. Následne od 6. novembra 2007 do 6. júna 2008 čerpala druhú materskú dovolenku, po ktorej nasledovala rodičovská dovolenka na výchovu dieťaťa od 1. augusta 2008, a to vo forme zníženia pracovného úväzku o jednu pätinu."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"odmietla skrátenie 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"definitívne odišla 7. septembra 2011 zo spoločnosti Praxair MRC. 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

RE je v obdobju od 4. februarja do 19. avgusta 2001 koristila prvi porodniški dopust, nato pa od 6. septembra 2001 do 6. septembra 2003 še starševski dopust. Dalje, v obdobju od 6. novembra 2007 do 6. junija 2008 je koristila drugi porodniški dopust, ter od 1. avgusta 2008 starševski dopust v obliki petine krajšega delovnega časa. Zadnji starševski dopust bi se moral končati 29. januarja 2011.
RE je bila 6. decembra 2010 v okviru kolektivnih odpustov iz poslovnih razlogov odpovedana pogodba o zaposlitvi. RE je sprejela devetmesečni dopust za prezaposlovanje.
Po tem, ko se je z učinkom od 1. januarja 2011 odpovedala pravici do dela s krajšim delovnim časom, je RE 7. septembra 2011 dokončno zapustila Praxair MRC.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="6. decembra 2010 v okviru kolektivnih odpustov iz poslovnih razlogov odpovedana pogodba o zaposlitvi. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="sprejela devetmesečni dopust za prezaposlovanje"];
  "RE"->"RE je v obdobju od 4. februarja do 19. avgusta 2001 koristila prvi porodniški dopust, nato pa od 6. septembra 2001 do 6. septembra 2003 še starševski dopust. Dalje, v obdobju od 6. novembra 2007 do 6. junija 2008 je koristila drugi porodniški dopust, ter od 1. avgusta 2008 starševski dopust v obliki petine krajšega delovnega časa."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"odpovedala pravici do dela s krajšim delovnim časom 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"7. septembra 2011 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

RE oli ensimmäisen kerran äitiysvapaalla 4.2.–19.8.2001, ja sen jälkeen hoitovapaalla 6.9.2001–6.9.2003. Tämän jälkeen hän oli toisen kerran äitiysvapaalla 6.11.2007–6.6.2008, ja sen jälkeen 1.8.2008 alkaen hoitovapaalla siten, että hänen työaikaansa vähennettiin viidenneksellä. Viimeksi mainitun vapaan oli tarkoitus päättyä 29.1.2011.
RE irtisanottiin 6.12.2010 taloudellisilla perusteilla toteutetun joukkoirtisanomisen yhteydessä. Hän hyväksyi yhdeksän kuukauden kestoisen uudelleentyöllistymisvapaan.
RE luopui lyhennetystä työajastaan 1.1.2011, ja hän jätti Praxair MRC:n lopullisesti 7.9.2011.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="irtisanottiin 6.12.2010 taloudellisilla perusteilla toteutetun joukkoirtisanomisen yhteydessä. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Hän hyväksyi yhdeksän kuukauden kestoisen uudelleentyöllistymisvapaan."];
  "RE"->"RE oli ensimmäisen kerran äitiysvapaalla 4.2.–19.8.2001, ja sen jälkeen hoitovapaalla 6.9.2001–6.9.2003. Tämän jälkeen hän oli toisen kerran äitiysvapaalla 6.11.2007–6.6.2008, ja sen jälkeen 1.8.2008 alkaen hoitovapaalla siten, että hänen työaikaansa vähennettiin viidenneksellä."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"RE luopui lyhennetystä työajastaan 1.1.2011 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"jätti 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

RE var mammaledig en första gång från den 4 februari till den 19 augusti 2001. Denna ledighet följdes av föräldraledighet från den 6 september 2001 till den 6 september 2003. Hon var därefter mammaledig en andra gång från den 6 november 2007 till den 6 juni 2008, och därefter föräldraledig från den 1 augusti 2008, i form av en nedsättning av arbetstiden med 20 procent. Sistnämnda ledighet skulle avslutas den 29 januari 2011.
Den 6 december 2010 sades RE upp inom ramen för ett kollektivt uppsägningsförfarande av ekonomiska skäl. Hon godtog en ledighet för omplaceringsåtgärder om nio månader.
Med verkan från och med den 1 januari 2011 avstod RE från sin nedsättning av arbetstiden för att den 7 september 2011 lämna företaget för gott.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Sades RE upp inom ramen för ett kollektivt uppsägningsförfarande av ekonomiska skäl. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="godtog en ledighet för omplaceringsåtgärder om nio månader."];
  "RE"->"RE var mammaledig en första gång från den 4 februari till den 19 augusti 2001. Denna ledighet följdes av föräldraledighet från den 6 september 2001 till den 6 september 2003. Hon var därefter mammaledig en andra gång från den 6 november 2007 till den 6 juni 2008, och därefter föräldraledig från den 1 augusti 2008, i form av en nedsättning av arbetstiden med 20 procent."[dir=none];
  "RE"->"Med verkan från och med den 1 januari 2011 avstod RE från sin nedsättning av arbetstiden 01/01/2011"[dir=none];
  "RE"->"lämna företaget för gott. 07/09/2011"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: English

On 30 September 2011, RE brought proceedings before the conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Labour Tribunal, Toulouse, France) to contest her dismissal and made several claims, in particular, for the payment of EUR 941.15 in respect of outstanding redundancy pay and of EUR 1 423.79 in respect of outstanding redeployment leave allowance.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Labour Tribunal, Toulouse, France)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "RE"->"Bring proceedings 30/09/2011";
   "Bring proceedings 30/09/2011"->"The conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Labour Tribunal, Toulouse, France)";
   "Bring proceedings 30/09/2011"->"The payment of EUR 941.15 in respect of outstanding redundancy pay and of EUR 1 423.79 in respect of outstanding redeployment leave allowance."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 30 септември 2011 г. RE обжалва уволнението си пред Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза, Франция), като предявява две искания, а именно за плащане на дължима към обезщетението ѝ при уволнение сума от 941,15 EUR и за плащане на дължима към обезщетението ѝ при отпуск за преквалификация сума от 1423,79 EUR.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза, Франция)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"обжалва уволнението си пред Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза, Франция), като предявява две искания 30/09/2011";
  "обжалва уволнението си пред Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза, Франция), като предявява две искания 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза, Франция)";
  "обжалва уволнението си пред Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза, Франция), като предявява две искания 30/09/2011"->"плащане на дължима към обезщетението ѝ при уволнение сума от 941,15 EUR и за плащане на дължима към обезщетението ѝ при отпуск за преквалификация сума от 1423,79 EUR."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 30 de septiembre de 2011, RE acudió al conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal Laboral Paritario de Toulouse, Francia) para impugnar su despido y formular diversas pretensiones, en particular el abono de 941,15 euros en concepto de atrasos de la indemnización por despido y de 1423,79 euros en concepto de atrasos del subsidio por permiso de recolocación.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal Laboral Paritario de Toulouse, Francia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"impugnar su despido y formular diversas pretensiones 30/09/2011";
  "impugnar su despido y formular diversas pretensiones 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal Laboral Paritario de Toulouse, Francia)";
  "impugnar su despido y formular diversas pretensiones 30/09/2011"->"el abono de 941,15 euros en concepto de atrasos de la indemnización por despido y de 1423,79 euros en concepto de atrasos del subsidio por permiso de recolocación.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dne 30. září 2011 se obrátila na conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (pracovní soud v Toulouse, Francie) a své propuštění zpochybnila, přičemž podala několik návrhů, a to zejména návrh na zaplacení částky 941,15 eur z titulu neuhrazeného odstupného při propuštění a částky 1423,79 eur z titulu neuhrazeného příspěvku po dobu rekvalifikačního volna.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (pracovní soud v Toulouse, Francie)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"obrátila 30/09/2011";
  "obrátila 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (pracovní soud v Toulouse, Francie)";
  "obrátila 30/09/2011"->"návrh na zaplacení částky 941,15 eur z titulu neuhrazeného odstupného při propuštění a částky 1423,79 eur z titulu neuhrazeného příspěvku po dobu rekvalifikačního volna.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den 30. september 2011 anlagde RE sag ved conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbejdsretten i Toulouse, Frankrig) for at anfægte sin afskedigelse og nedlagde forskellige påstande, bl.a. om betaling af et beløb på 941,15 EUR for udestående fratrædelsesgodtgørelse og et beløb på 1423,79 EUR for udestående ydelse under omskolingsorlov.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbejdsretten i Toulouse, Frankrig)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"anlagde RE sag 30/09/2011";
  "anlagde RE sag 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbejdsretten i Toulouse, Frankrig)";
  "anlagde RE sag 30/09/2011"->"betaling af et beløb på 941,15 EUR for udestående fratrædelsesgodtgørelse og et beløb på 1423,79 EUR for udestående ydelse under omskolingsorlov.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: German

Am 30. September 2011 rief RE den Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Arbeitsgericht Toulouse, Frankreich) an, um ihre Entlassung anzufechten, und stellte verschiedene Anträge, u. a. auf Zahlung eines Betrags von 941,15 Euro im Rahmen einer Neuberechnung der Entlassungsentschädigung und eines Betrags von 1423,79 Euro im Rahmen einer Neuberechnung der Zuwendung für einen Wiedereingliederungsurlaub.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Arbeitsgericht Toulouse, Frankreich)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"rief an 30/09/2011";
  "rief an 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Arbeitsgericht Toulouse, Frankreich)";
  "rief an 30/09/2011"->"Zahlung eines Betrags von 941,15 Euro im Rahmen einer Neuberechnung der Entlassungsentschädigung und eines Betrags von 1423,79 Euro im Rahmen einer Neuberechnung der Zuwendung für einen Wiedereingliederungsurlaub.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

RE pöördus 30. septembril 2011 Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse’i (töövaidluskohus, Prantsusmaa), vaidlustades oma koondamise ning esitades erinevad nõuded, eelkõige nõude maksta 941,15 eurot maksmata koondamishüvitist ning 1423,79 eurot maksmata ümberpaigutamispuhkuse toetust.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (töövaidluskohus, Prantsusmaa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"pöördus 30/09/2011";
  "pöördus 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (töövaidluskohus, Prantsusmaa)";
  "pöördus 30/09/2011"->"maksta 941,15 eurot maksmata koondamishüvitist ning 1423,79 eurot maksmata ümberpaigutamispuhkuse toetust.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 30 Σεπτεμβρίου 2011, η RE προσέφυγε στο conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Τουλούζης, Γαλλία), προσβάλλοντας την απόλυσή της και προβάλλοντας διάφορα αιτήματα, μεταξύ των οποίων αίτημα καταβολής ποσού 941,15 ευρώ, λόγω οφειλόμενης αποζημίωσης απόλυσης, και αίτημα καταβολής ποσού 1 423,79 ευρώ, λόγω οφειλόμενου επιδόματος άδειας επανένταξης.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Τουλούζης, Γαλλία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"προσέφυγε 30/09/2011";
  "προσέφυγε 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Τουλούζης, Γαλλία)";
  "προσέφυγε 30/09/2011"->"καταβολής ποσού 941,15 ευρώ, λόγω οφειλόμενης αποζημίωσης απόλυσης, και αίτημα καταβολής ποσού 1 423,79 ευρώ, λόγω οφειλόμενου επιδόματος άδειας επανένταξης.."[dir=none];

}