mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Estonian

Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (Antwerpeni täitmiskohus) lükkas 31. juuli 2018. aasta otsusega IK argumendid tagasi ja jättis tema vabadusekaotuse muutmata. IK esitas 3. augustil 2018 selle kohtuotsuse peale kassatsioonkaebuse eelotsusetaotluse esitanud Hof van Cassatiele (Belgia kassatsioonikohus).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpeni täitmiskohus)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Belgia kassatsioonikohus)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpeni täitmiskohus)"->"31. juuli 2018. aasta otsusega";
  "31. juuli 2018. aasta otsusega"->"IK";
  "31. juuli 2018. aasta otsusega"->"jättis tema vabadusekaotuse muutmata."[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Belgia kassatsioonikohus)"[label="3. augustil 2018 selle kohtuotsuse peale kassatsioonkaebuse"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Greek

Με απόφαση της 31ης Ιουλίου 2018, το strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας) απέρριψε την επιχειρηματολογία του IK και αποφάσισε να διατηρήσει τη στέρηση της ελευθερίας του. Στις 3 Αυγούστου 2018, ο IK άσκησε αναίρεση κατά της απόφασης αυτής ενώπιον του αιτούντος δικαστηρίου, του Hof van Cassatie (Ανώτατου Ακυρωτικού Δικαστηρίου, Βέλγιο).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Ανώτατου Ακυρωτικού Δικαστηρίου, Βέλγιο)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας)"->"απόφαση της 31ης Ιουλίου 2018";
  "απόφαση της 31ης Ιουλίου 2018"->"IK";
  "απόφαση της 31ης Ιουλίου 2018"->"αποφάσισε να διατηρήσει τη στέρηση της ελευθερίας του"[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Ανώτατου Ακυρωτικού Δικαστηρίου, Βέλγιο)"[label="Στις 3 Αυγούστου 2018, ο IK άσκησε αναίρεση"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: French

Par un jugement du 31 juillet 2018, le strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (tribunal de l’application des peines d’Anvers) a rejeté l’argumentation d’IK et a décidé de maintenir sa privation de liberté. Le 3 août 2018, IK a formé un pourvoi contre ce jugement devant la juridiction de renvoi, le Hof van Cassatie (Cour de cassation, Belgique).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal de l’application des peines d’Anvers)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Cour de cassation, Belgique)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal de l’application des peines d’Anvers)"->"un jugement du 31 juillet 2018";
  "un jugement du 31 juillet 2018"->"IK";
  "un jugement du 31 juillet 2018"->"a décidé de maintenir sa privation de liberté."[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Cour de cassation, Belgique)"[label="Le 3 août 2018, IK a formé un pourvoi"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Croatian

Presudom od 31. srpnja 2018. strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (Sud izvršenja kazne, Antwerpen) odbio je argumente osobe IK i odlučio održati na snazi odluku o njezinu oduzimanju slobode. Osoba IK je 3. kolovoza 2018. podnijela žalbu protiv te presude sudu koji je uputio zahtjev, odnosno Hof van Cassatie (Kasacijski sud).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Sud izvršenja kazne, Antwerpen)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Kasacijski sud)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Sud izvršenja kazne, Antwerpen)"->"Presudom od 31. srpnja 2018.";
  "Presudom od 31. srpnja 2018."->"IK";
  "Presudom od 31. srpnja 2018."->"odlučio održati na snazi odluku o njezinu oduzimanju slobode."[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Kasacijski sud)"[label="3. kolovoza 2018. podnijela žalbu"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Italian

Con sentenza del 31 luglio 2018, lo strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (Tribunale dell’esecuzione penale di Anversa) ha respinto l’argomento di IK e ha deciso di mantenerlo in stato di detenzione. Il 3 agosto 2018, IK ha proposto ricorso per cassazione contro tale sentenza dinanzi al giudice del rinvio, lo Hof van Cassatie (Corte di cassazione, Belgio).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale dell’esecuzione penale di Anversa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Corte di cassazione, Belgio)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale dell’esecuzione penale di Anversa)"->"sentenza del 31 luglio 2018";
  "sentenza del 31 luglio 2018"->"IK";
  "sentenza del 31 luglio 2018"->"ha deciso di mantenerlo in stato di detenzione"[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Corte di cassazione, Belgio)"[label="Il 3 agosto 2018, IK ha proposto ricorso per cassazione"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Latvian

Ar 2018. gada 31. jūlija spriedumu strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (Antverpenes Kriminālsodu izpildes tiesa) noraidīja IK argumentus un nolēma paturēt viņu ieslodzījumā. 2018. gada 3. augustā IK iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību par šo spriedumu iesniedzējtiesā, Hof van Cassatie (Kasācijas tiesa, Beļģija).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpenes Kriminālsodu izpildes tiesa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Kasācijas tiesa, Beļģija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpenes Kriminālsodu izpildes tiesa)"->"2018. gada 31. jūlija spriedumu";
  "2018. gada 31. jūlija spriedumu"->"IK";
  "2018. gada 31. jūlija spriedumu"->"nolēma paturēt viņu ieslodzījumā"[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Kasācijas tiesa, Beļģija)"[label="2018. gada 3. augustā IK iesniedza apelācijas sūdzību"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Lithuanian

2018 m. liepos 31 d. nuosprendžiu strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (Antverpeno bausmių skyrimo teismas) atmetė IK argumentus ir nusprendė palikti jį įkalintą. 2018 m. rugpjūčio 3 d. IK šį nuosprendį apskundė kasacine tvarka prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikusiam teismui – Hof van Cassatie (Kasacinis teismas, Belgija).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpeno bausmių skyrimo teismas)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Kasacinis teismas, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpeno bausmių skyrimo teismas)"->"2018 m. liepos 31 d. nuosprendžiu";
  "2018 m. liepos 31 d. nuosprendžiu"->"IK";
  "2018 m. liepos 31 d. nuosprendžiu"->"nusprendė palikti jį įkalintą."[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Kasacinis teismas, Belgija)"[label="2018 m. rugpjūčio 3 d. IK šį nuosprendį apskundė kasacine tvarka"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Hungarian

2018. július 31‑i ítéletével a strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (antwerpeni büntetés‑végrehajtási bíróság) IK érvelését elutasította, és a szabadságvesztés fenntartásáról határozott. 2018. augusztus 3 án IK felülvizsgálati kérelmet terjesztett elő ezen ítélettel szemben a Hof van cassatie (semmítőszék, Belgium) előtt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (antwerpeni büntetés‑végrehajtási bíróság)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Hof van cassatie (semmítőszék, Belgium))"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (antwerpeni büntetés‑végrehajtási bíróság)"->"2018. július 31‑i ítéletével";
  "2018. július 31‑i ítéletével"->"IK";
  "2018. július 31‑i ítéletével"->"a szabadságvesztés fenntartásáról határozott."[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Hof van cassatie (semmítőszék, Belgium))"[label="2018. augusztus 3 án IK felülvizsgálati kérelmet terjesztett elő"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Maltese

Permezz ta’ deċiżjoni tal-31 ta’ Lulju 2018, l-istrafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (il-Qorti Penitenzjarja ta’ Anvers) ċaħdet l-argument ta’ IK u ddeċidiet li żżomm it-tiċħid tal-libertà tiegħu. Fit-3 ta’ Awwissu 2018, IK appella minn din is-sentenza quddiem il-qorti tar-rinviju, il-Hof van Cassatie (il-Qorti tal-Kassazzjoni, il-Belġju).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (istrafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Hof van Cassatie (il-Qorti tal-Kassazzjoni, il-Belġju))"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (istrafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen)"->"deċiżjoni tal-31 ta’ Lulju 2018";
  "deċiżjoni tal-31 ta’ Lulju 2018"->"IK";
  "deċiżjoni tal-31 ta’ Lulju 2018"->"Ddeċidiet li żżomm it-tiċħid tal-libertà tiegħu"[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Hof van Cassatie (il-Qorti tal-Kassazzjoni, il-Belġju))"[label="Fit-3 ta’ Awwissu 2018, IK appella"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Dutch

Bij vonnis van 31 juli 2018 heeft de strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen de redenering van IK afgewezen en beslist tot handhaving van zijn detentie. Op 3 augustus 2018 heeft IK tegen dit vonnis een hogere voorziening ingesteld bij de verwijzende rechter, het Hof van Cassatie (België).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Hof van Cassatie (België))"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen)"->"vonnis van 31 juli 2018";
  "vonnis van 31 juli 2018"->"IK";
  "vonnis van 31 juli 2018"->"beslist tot handhaving van zijn detentie."[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Hof van Cassatie (België))"[label="3 augustus 2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Polish

Wyrokiem z dnia 31 lipca 2018 r. strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (sąd penitencjarny w Antwerpii) oddalił argumentację IK i orzekł o przedłużeniu wobec niego pozbawienia wolności. W dniu 3 sierpnia 2018 r. IK złożył od tego wyroku skargę kasacyjną do sądu odsyłającego, Hof van Cassatie (sadu kasacyjnego, Belgia).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (sąd penitencjarny w Antwerpii)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (sądu kasacyjnego, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (sąd penitencjarny w Antwerpii)"->"Wyrokiem z dnia 31 lipca 2018 r.";
  "Wyrokiem z dnia 31 lipca 2018 r."->"IK";
  "Wyrokiem z dnia 31 lipca 2018 r."->"orzekł o przedłużeniu wobec niego pozbawienia wolności."[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (sądu kasacyjnego, Belgia)"[label="3 sierpnia 2018 r."];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Portuguese

Por sentença de 31 de julho de 2018, o strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (Tribunal de Execução das Penas de Antuérpia) rejeitou a argumentação de IK e decidiu manter a sua privação de liberdade. Em 3 de agosto de 2018, IK interpôs recurso dessa sentença no órgão jurisdicional de reenvio, o Hof van Cassatie (Tribunal de Cassação, Bélgica).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de Execução das Penas de Antuérpia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Tribunal de Cassação, Bélgica)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de Execução das Penas de Antuérpia)"->"sentença de 31 de julho de 2018";
  "sentença de 31 de julho de 2018"->"IK";
  "sentença de 31 de julho de 2018"->"decidiu manter a sua privação de liberdade"[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Tribunal de Cassação, Bélgica)"[label="3 de agosto de 2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Romanian

Printr‑o hotărâre din 31 iulie 2018, strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Aplicarea Pedepselor din Antwerpen) a respins argumentația lui IK și a decis să mențină privarea sa de libertate. La 3 august 2018, IK a formulat recurs împotriva acestei hotărâri în fața instanței de trimitere, Hof van Cassatie (Curtea de Casație, Belgia).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Aplicarea Pedepselor din Antwerpen)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Curtea de Casație, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Aplicarea Pedepselor din Antwerpen)"->"hotărâre din 31 iulie 2018";
  "hotărâre din 31 iulie 2018"->"IK";
  "hotărâre din 31 iulie 2018"->"a decis să mențină privarea sa de libertate."[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Curtea de Casație, Belgia)"[label="3 august 2018, IK a formulat recurs"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Slovak

Rozsudkom z 31. júla 2018 Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (Súd pre výkon trestov Antverpy) zamietol argumentáciu IK a rozhodol o pokračovaní jeho väzby. Dňa 3. augusta 2018 sa IK proti tomuto rozsudku odvolal na Hof van Cassatie (Kasačný súd, Belgicko), vnútroštátny súd, ktorý podal tento návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Súd pre výkon trestov Antverpy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Kasačný súd, Belgicko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Súd pre výkon trestov Antverpy)"->"Rozsudkom z 31. júla 2018";
  "Rozsudkom z 31. júla 2018"->"IK";
  "Rozsudkom z 31. júla 2018"->"rozhodol o pokračovaní jeho väzby"[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Kasačný súd, Belgicko)"[label="Dňa 3. augusta 2018 sa IK proti tomuto rozsudku odvolal"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Slovenian

Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (sodišče, pristojno za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij, v Antwerpnu) je s sodbo z dne 31. julija 2018 zavrnilo trditve osebe IK in odločilo, da ostaja v zaporu. Oseba IK je 3. avgusta 2018 zoper to sodbo pri predložitvenemu sodišču, Hof van Cassatie (kasacijsko sodišče, Belgija), vložila pritožbo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (sodišče, pristojno za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij, v Antwerpnu)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (kasacijsko sodišče, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (sodišče, pristojno za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij, v Antwerpnu)"->"sodbo z dne 31. julija 2018";
  "sodbo z dne 31. julija 2018"->"IK";
  "sodbo z dne 31. julija 2018"->"odločilo, da ostaja v zaporu."[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (kasacijsko sodišče, Belgija)"[label="3. avgusta 2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Finnish

Antwerpenin strafuitvoeringsrechtbank hylkäsi 31.7.2018 antamallaan ratkaisulla IK:n väitteet ja päätti jatkaa hänen vapaudenriistoaan. IK valitti tästä ratkaisusta 3.8.2018 ennakkoratkaisua pyytäneeseen tuomioistuimeen eli Hof van Cassatieen (ylin tuomioistuin, Belgia).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpenin strafuitvoeringsrechtbank)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Hof van Cassatieen (ylin tuomioistuin, Belgia))"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpenin strafuitvoeringsrechtbank)"->"31.7.2018";
  "31.7.2018"->"IK";
  "31.7.2018"->"päätti jatkaa hänen vapaudenriistoaan."[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Hof van Cassatieen (ylin tuomioistuin, Belgia))"[label="3.8.2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Swedish

I dom av den 31 juli 2018 underkände Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (Domstolen för straffverkställighet i Antwerpen) IK:s argument och beslutade att han skulle hållas fortsatt frihetsberövad. Den 3 augusti 2018 överklagade IK den domen till den hänskjutande domstolen, Hof van Cassatie (Högsta domstolen, Belgien).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Domstolen för straffverkställighet i Antwerpen)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "The Hof van Cassatie (Högsta domstolen, Belgien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Domstolen för straffverkställighet i Antwerpen)"->"dom av den 31 juli 2018";
  "dom av den 31 juli 2018"->"IK";
  "dom av den 31 juli 2018"->"beslutade att han skulle hållas fortsatt frihetsberövad."[dir=none];
  "IK"->"The Hof van Cassatie (Högsta domstolen, Belgien)"[label="Den 3 augusti 2018 överklagade IK den domen"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: German

Unter diesen Umständen hat der Hof van Cassatie (Kassationshof) beschlossen, das Verfahren auszusetzen und dem Gerichtshof folgende Fragen zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen:

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The Hof van Cassatie Hof van Cassatie (Kassationshof)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "der Gerichtshof"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The Hof van Cassatie Hof van Cassatie (Kassationshof)"->"Fragen zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen";
  "Fragen zur Vorabentscheidung vorzulegen"->"der Gerichtshof";
   
}
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
RD v SC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Certification of a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order — Minimum standards applicable to uncontested claims procedures — Defendant without a known address who did not appear at the hearing.
Case C-518/18. (2019)
Language: English

By an action brought before the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (District Court, České Budějovice), RD applied for payment by SC of the sum of 6600 Czech koruny (CZK) (approximately EUR 250), together with late payment interest, on the ground that, under the terms of a lease agreement concluded on 23 July 2008 which became effective on 1 August 2008, SC had the use of an apartment in České Budějovice and became contractually liable to pay rent of CZK 5600 and provisional charges of CZK 1000, making a total sum of CZK 6600 per month. On 28 September 2008, SC drafted an acknowledgement of debt and undertook to pay that debt before 30 September 2008, which she did not do.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (District Court, České Budějovice)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "RD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "SC"[shape=doubleoctagon];

   "RD"->"SC"[label="Lease agreement concluded on 23/07/2008, effective on 01/08/2008"dir=none];
   "SC"->"RD"[label="Pay that debt before 30/09/2008"style=dashed];
   "SC"->"The use of an apartment in České Budějovice. Pay rent of CZK 5600 and provisional charges of CZK 1000"[dir=none];
   "SC"->"Drafted an acknowledgement of debt 28/09/2008"[dir=none];
   "RD"->"The Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (District Court, České Budějovice)"[label="Bring an action"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
RD v SC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Certification of a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order — Minimum standards applicable to uncontested claims procedures — Defendant without a known address who did not appear at the hearing.
Case C-518/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

С иск, предявен пред Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Районен съд Ческе Будейовице, Чешка република), RD претендира от SC заплащането на сумата от 6600 CZK (чешки крони) (около 250 EUR) заедно с лихви за забава с мотива, че по силата на договор за наем, сключен на 23 юли 2008 г. и влязъл в сила на 1 август 2008 г., SC е използвала апартамент в Ческе Будейовице и в договора се е задължила да заплаща наем от 5600 CZK, както и сумата от 1000 CZK авансово за режийни разноски, или общо 6600 CZK месечно. На 28 септември 2008 г. SC признава дълга си писмено и се задължава да го погаси до 30 септември 2008 г. — нещо, което не прави.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Районен съд, České Budějovice)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "SC"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "RD"->"SC"[label="договор за наем, сключен на 23 юли 2008 г. и влязъл в сила на 1 август 2008 г. 01/08/2008"dir=none];
  "SC"->"RD"[label="да го погаси до 30 септември 2008 г. 30/09/2008"style=dashed];
  "SC"->"SC е използвала апартамент в Ческе Будейовице и в договора се е задължила да заплаща наем от 5600 CZK, както и сумата от 1000 CZK авансово за режийни разноски"[dir=none];
  "SC"->"На 28 септември 2008 г. SC признава дълга си писмено 28/09/2008"[dir=none];
  "RD"->"Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Районен съд, České Budějovice)"[label="С иск, предявен пред"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
RD v SC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Certification of a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order — Minimum standards applicable to uncontested claims procedures — Defendant without a known address who did not appear at the hearing.
Case C-518/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Mediante demanda presentada ante el Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Tribunal Comarcal de České Budějovice, República Checa), RD solicitó que se condenase a SC al pago de 6600 coronas checas (CZK) (250 euros aproximadamente) junto con los intereses de demora, basándose en que, en virtud de las estipulaciones de un contrato de arrendamiento celebrado el 23 de julio de 2008, con efectos desde el 1 de agosto de 2008, SC tenía el uso y disfrute de un apartamento sito en České Budějovice y se había obligado contractualmente a pagar por el alquiler del apartamento una renta de 5600 CZK y los gastos correspondientes, calculados con carácter provisional en 1000 CZK, es decir, una cantidad total de 6600 CZK mensuales. El 28 de septiembre de 2008, SC reconoció su deuda por escrito y se comprometió a pagarla antes del 30 de septiembre de 2008, cosa que no hizo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Tribunal Comarcal, České Budějovice)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "SC"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "RD"->"SC"[label="un contrato de arrendamiento celebrado el 23 de julio de 2008, con efectos desde el 1 de agosto de 2008 01/08/2008"dir=none];
  "SC"->"RD"[label="pagarla antes del 30 de septiembre de 2008 30/09/2008"style=dashed];
  "SC"->"El uso y disfrute de un apartamento sito en České Budějovice. Pagar por el alquiler del apartamento una renta de 5600 CZK y los gastos correspondientes, calculados con carácter provisional en 1000 CZK."[dir=none];
  "SC"->"El 28 de septiembre de 2008, SC reconoció su deuda por escrito 28/09/2008"[dir=none];
  "RD"->"Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Tribunal Comarcal, České Budějovice)"[label="Mediante demanda presentada"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
RD v SC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Certification of a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order — Minimum standards applicable to uncontested claims procedures — Defendant without a known address who did not appear at the hearing.
Case C-518/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Žalobou podanou k Okresnímu soudu v Českých Budějovicích (Česká republika) se RD domáhala proti SC zaplacení částky 6600 korun českých (Kč) (přibližně 250 eur) s poplatkem z prodlení s odůvodněním, že podle nájemní smlouvy ze dne 23. července 2008, která nabyla účinnosti dnem 1. srpna 2008, užívala SC byt v Českých Budějovicích a zavázala se ve smlouvě platit nájemné ve výši 5600 Kč a zálohy za úhrady spojené s užíváním bytu ve výši 1000 Kč, celkem tedy částku 6600 Kč měsíčně. Dne 28. září 2008 SC uznala písemně svůj dluh a zavázala se jej zaplatit do 30. září 2008, což neučinila.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Okresnímu soudu, České Budějovice)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "SC"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "RD"->"SC"[label="nájemní smlouvy ze dne 23. července 2008, která nabyla účinnosti dnem 1. srpna 2008 01/08/2008"dir=none];
  "SC"->"RD"[label="zaplatit do 30/09/2008"style=dashed];
  "SC"->"užívala SC byt v Českých Budějovicích a zavázala se ve smlouvě platit nájemné ve výši 5600 Kč a zálohy za úhrady spojené s užíváním bytu ve výši 1000 Kč"[dir=none];
  "SC"->"Dne 28. září 2008 SC uznala písemně svůj dluh 28/09/2008"[dir=none];
  "RD"->"Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Okresnímu soudu, České Budějovice)"[label="Žalobou podanou k Okresnímu soudu v Českých Budějovicích (Česká republika) se RD domáhala proti SC zaplacení částky 6600 korun českých (Kč) (přibližně 250 eur) s poplatkem z prodlení s odůvodněním"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
RD v SC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Certification of a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order — Minimum standards applicable to uncontested claims procedures — Defendant without a known address who did not appear at the hearing.
Case C-518/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

RD anlagde sag mod SC ved Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (kredsdomstolen i České Budějovice, Den Tjekkiske Republik) med påstand om betaling af et beløb på 6600 tjekkiske koruna (CZK) (ca. 250 EUR) med tillæg af renter for forsinket betaling med den begrundelse, at SC i henhold til en lejeaftale af 23. juli 2008, der trådte i kraft den 1. august 2008, havde rådighed over en bolig i České Budějovice og i aftalen havde forpligtet sig til at betale en husleje på 5600 CZK og et acontobeløb til dækning af udgifter forbundet med brug af boligen på 1000 CZK, hvilket vil sige et samlet månedligt beløb på 6600 CZK. Den 28. september 2008 anerkendte SC skriftligt sin gæld og forpligtede sig til at betale gælden senest den 30. september 2008, hvilket hun ikke gjorde.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Okresní soud, České Budějovice)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "SC"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "RD"->"SC"[label="01/08/2008: lejeaftale af 23. juli 2008, der trådte i kraft den 1. august 2008 01/08/2008"dir=none];
  "SC"->"RD"[label="betale gælden senest den 30. september 2008, 30/09/2008"style=dashed];
  "SC"->"SC i henhold til en lejeaftale af 23. juli 2008, der trådte i kraft den 1. august 2008, havde rådighed over en bolig i České Budějovice og i aftalen havde forpligtet sig til at betale en husleje på 5600 CZK og et acontobeløb til dækning af udgifter forbundet med brug af boligen på 1000 CZK"[dir=none];
  "SC"->"Den 28. september 2008 anerkendte SC skriftligt sin gæld 28/09/2008"[dir=none];
  "RD"->"Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Okresní soud, České Budějovice)"[label="RD anlagde sag mod SC"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
RD v SC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Certification of a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order — Minimum standards applicable to uncontested claims procedures — Defendant without a known address who did not appear at the hearing.
Case C-518/18. (2019)
Language: German

Mit vor dem Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Bezirksgericht Budweis, Tschechische Republik) erhobener Klage begehrte RD von SC die Zahlung eines Betrags in Höhe von 6600 tschechischen Kronen (CZK) (etwa 250 Euro) samt Verzugszinsen, weil SC gemäß einem Mietvertrag vom 23. Juli 2008, der ab dem 1. August 2008 wirksam geworden sei, eine Wohnung in Budweis genutzt und sich vertraglich zur Zahlung eines Mietzinses in Höhe von 5600 CZK sowie einer Vorauszahlung für laufende Kosten im Zusammenhang mit der Benutzung der Wohnung in Höhe von 1000 CZK, insgesamt somit eines monatlichen Betrags in Höhe von 6600 CZK, verpflichtet habe. Am 28. September 2008 habe SC ihre Schuld schriftlich anerkannt und sich zu deren Begleichung bis zum 30. September 2008 verpflichtet, was sie jedoch unterlassen habe.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Bezirksgericht, České Budějovice)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "SC"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "RD"->"SC"[label="Mietvertrag vom 23. Juli 2008, der ab dem 1. August 2008 wirksam geworden sei 01/08/2008"dir=none];
  "SC"->"RD"[label="sich zu deren Begleichung bis zum 30. September 2008 verpflichtet 30/09/2008"style=dashed];
  "SC"->"eine Wohnung in Budweis genutzt und sich vertraglich zur Zahlung eines Mietzinses in Höhe von 5600 CZK sowie einer Vorauszahlung für laufende Kosten im Zusammenhang mit der Benutzung der Wohnung in Höhe von 1000 CZK"[dir=none];
  "SC"->"Am 28. September 2008 habe SC ihre Schuld schriftlich anerkannt 28/09/2008"[dir=none];
  "RD"->"Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Bezirksgericht, České Budějovice)"[label="erhobener Klage"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
RD v SC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Certification of a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order — Minimum standards applicable to uncontested claims procedures — Defendant without a known address who did not appear at the hearing.
Case C-518/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicíchile (České Budějovice piirkondlik kohus, Tšehhi Vabariik) esitatud hagiavalduses palus RD, et SC‑lt mõistetaks välja 6600 Tšehhi krooni suurune summa (umbes 250 eurot) koos viivisintressiga sellest tulenevalt, et 23. juulil 2008 sõlmitud ja 1. augustil 2008 jõustunud üürilepingu alusel oli SC kasutuses eluruum České Budějovices ning ta oli lepinguga kohustunud maksma üüri 5600 Tšehhi krooni ja kandma korteri kasutamisega seotud kõrvalkulusid 1000 Tšehhi krooni, mis teeb kokku 6600 Tšehhi krooni kuus. SC tunnustas 28. septembril 2008 oma võlga kirjalikult ning kohustus selle 30. septembriks 2008 tasuma, mida ta ei teinud.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (České Budějovice piirkondlik kohus, České Budějovice)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "SC"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "RD"->"SC"[label="23. juulil 2008 sõlmitud ja 1. augustil 2008 jõustunud üürilepingu 01/08/2008"dir=none];
  "SC"->"RD"[label="30. septembriks 2008 tasuma 30/09/2008"style=dashed];
  "SC"->"SC kasutuses oli eluruum České Budějovices ning ta oli lepinguga kohustatud maksma üüri 5600 Tšehhi krooni ja kandma korteri kasutamisega seotud kõrvalkulusid 1000 Tšehhi krooni."[dir=none];
  "SC"->"SC tunnustas 28. septembril 2008 oma võlga kirjalikult 28/09/2008"[dir=none];
  "RD"->"Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (České Budějovice piirkondlik kohus, České Budějovice)"[label="esitatud hagiavalduses palus RD, et SC‑lt mõistetaks välja 6600 Tšehhi krooni suurune summa"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
RD v SC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Certification of a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order — Minimum standards applicable to uncontested claims procedures — Defendant without a known address who did not appear at the hearing.
Case C-518/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Με αγωγή που κατέθεσε ενώπιον του Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (ειρηνοδικείου České Budějovice, Τσεχική Δημοκρατία), η RD ζήτησε να υποχρεωθεί η SC να της καταβάλει το ποσό των 6600 τσεχικών κορώνων (CZK) (περίπου 250 ευρώ) πλέον τόκων υπερημερίας, για τον λόγο ότι δυνάμει σύμβασης μίσθωσης η οποία συνήφθη στις 23 Ιουλίου 2008 και τέθηκε σε ισχύ την 1η Αυγούστου 2008, η SC απέκτησε τη χρήση ενός διαμερίσματος στο České Budějovice και ανέλαβε συμβατικώς την υποχρέωση να καταβάλλει ως μίσθωμα το ποσό των 5600 CZK καθώς και ως προκαταβολή για κοινόχρηστες και άλλες δαπάνες, το ποσό των 1000 CZK, ήτοι, να καταβάλλει συνολικώς, το ποσό των 6600 CZK μηνιαίως. Στις 28 Σεπτεμβρίου 2008, η SC αναγνώρισε εγγράφως την οφειλή της και ανέλαβε την υποχρέωση να την εξοφλήσει έως τις 30 Σεπτεμβρίου 2008, κάτι το οποίο δεν έπραξε.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Okresní soud, České Budějovice)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "SC"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "RD"->"SC"[label="σύμβασης μίσθωσης η οποία συνήφθη στις 23 Ιουλίου 2008 και τέθηκε σε ισχύ την 1η Αυγούστου 2008 01/08/2008"dir=none];
  "SC"->"RD"[label="να την εξοφλήσει έως τις 30 Σεπτεμβρίου 2008 30/09/2008"style=dashed];
  "SC"->"η SC απέκτησε τη χρήση ενός διαμερίσματος στο České Budějovice και ανέλαβε συμβατικώς την υποχρέωση να καταβάλλει ως μίσθωμα το ποσό των 5600 CZK καθώς και ως προκαταβολή για κοινόχρηστες και άλλες δαπάνες, το ποσό των 1000 CZK"[dir=none];
  "SC"->"αναγνώρισε εγγράφως την οφειλή της 28/09/2008"[dir=none];
  "RD"->"Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Okresní soud, České Budějovice)"[label="Με αγωγή"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.
RD v SC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Certification of a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order — Minimum standards applicable to uncontested claims procedures — Defendant without a known address who did not appear at the hearing.
Case C-518/18. (2019)
Language: French

Par un recours introduit devant l’Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (tribunal de district de České Budějovice, République tchèque), RD a demandé le paiement, par SC, d’une somme de 6600 couronnes tchèques (CZK) (environ 250 euros) assortie de pénalités de retard, au motif que, en vertu des stipulations d’un contrat de bail conclu le 23 juillet 2008 et devenu effectif le 1er août 2008, SC avait la jouissance d’un appartement sis à České Budějovice et qu’elle s’était contractuellement engagée à payer un loyer de 5600 CZK ainsi que des charges provisionnelles de 1000 CZK, soit une somme totale de 6600 CZK par mois. Le 28 septembre 2008, SC a rédigé une reconnaissance de dette et s’est engagée à régler cette dette avant le 30 septembre 2008, ce qu’elle n’a pas fait.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (tribunal de district, České Budějovice)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RD"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "SC"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "RD"->"SC"[label="1er août 2008 01/08/2008"dir=none];
  "SC"->"RD"[label="régler cette dette avant le 30 septembre 2008 30/09/2008"style=dashed];
  "SC"->"la jouissance d’un appartement sis à České Budějovice et qu’elle s’était contractuellement engagée à payer un loyer de 5600 CZK ainsi que des charges provisionnelles de 1000 CZK"[dir=none];
  "SC"->"a rédigé une reconnaissance de dette 28/09/2008"[dir=none];
  "RD"->"Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (tribunal de district, České Budějovice)"[label="Par un recours introduit devant l’Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích"];
}