mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Na podporu tohto tvrdenia sa OG opieral o právne stanovisko vypracované jedným nemeckým advokátom, z ktorého predovšetkým vyplývalo, že podľa nemeckého práva nemá prokuratúra postavenie samostatného alebo nezávislého súdu, ale je súčasťou administratívnej hierarchie, na ktorej čele sa nachádza minister spravodlivosti, takže existuje riziko politického zasahovania do konania o odovzdávaní osôb. Okrem toho prokuratúra podľa nemeckého práva nie je súdnym orgánom, ktorý by mal právomoc nariadiť zadržanie alebo zatknutie osoby v Nemecku, s výnimkou mimoriadnych okolností. Táto právomoc prislúcha výlučne sudcom a súdom. Prokuratúra má však právomoc vykonať vnútroštátny zatykač, ktorý vydal sudca alebo súd, a to prípadne prostredníctvom vydania európskeho zatykača. V dôsledku toho európsky zatykač na OG nevydal „súdny orgán“ v zmysle článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584.
Za týchto okolností sa High Court (Vyšší súd) prostredníctvom írskeho ústredného orgánu obrátil na prokuratúru v Lübecku s cieľom získať dodatočné informácie v súvislosti s dôkazmi predloženými OG, pokiaľ ide o postavenie tejto prokuratúry ako „súdneho orgánu“ s ohľadom najmä na rozsudky z 10. novembra 2016, Poltorak (C‑452/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:858), a z 10. novembra 2016, Özçelik (C‑453/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:860).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "írskeho ústredného orgánu"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Vyšší súd"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "prokuratúru v Lübecku"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "prokuratúru v Lübecku"->"Vyšší súd"[label="High Court (Vyšší súd) prostredníctvom írskeho ústredného orgánu obrátil na prokuratúru v Lübecku s cieľom získať dodatočné informácie v súvislosti s dôkazmi predloženými OG, pokiaľ ide o postavenie tejto prokuratúry ako „súdneho orgánu“ s ohľadom najmä na rozsudky z 10. novembra 2016, Poltorak (C‑452/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:858), a z 10. novembra 2016, Özçelik (C‑453/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:860). 08/12/2016"];
  "írskeho ústredného orgánu"->"prokuratúru v Lübecku";
  "Vyšší súd"->"s cieľom získať dodatočné informácie";
  "s cieľom získať dodatočné informácie"->"írskeho ústredného orgánu";
  "s cieľom získať dodatočné informácie"->"pokiaľ ide o postavenie tejto prokuratúry ako „súdneho orgánu“ s ohľadom najmä na rozsudky z 10. novembra 2016, Poltorak, a z 10. novembra 2016, Özçelik, Özçelik"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

V podporo tej trditvi se je OG oprl na pravno mnenje, ki ga je sestavil nemški odvetnik, in iz katerega je zlasti izhajalo, da po nemškem pravu državno tožilstvo ne uživa samostojnega ali neodvisnega statusa sodišča, pač pa spada v upravno hierarhijo, ki jo vodi ministrstvo za pravosodje, tako da obstaja tveganje političnega poseganja v postopke predaje. Poleg tega naj državno tožilstvo ne bi bilo pravosodni organ s pristojnostjo odrejanja pripora ali odvzema prostosti kogar koli, razen v izjemnih okoliščinah. To pristojnost naj bi imel le sodnik ali sodišče. Državno tožilstvo naj bi bilo pristojno za izvršitev nacionalnega naloga za prijetje, ki ga izda sodnik ali sodišče, po potrebi z izdajo evropskega naloga za prijetje. Zato naj noben „pravosodni organ“ v smislu člena 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584 ne bi bil udeležen pri izdaji evropskega naloga za prijetje zoper OG.
V teh okoliščinah se je High Court (višje sodišče) preko centralnega irskega organa obrnilo na državno tožilstvo v Lübecku, da bi pridobilo dodatne informacije o dokazih, ki jih je predložil OG v zvezi z opredelitvijo tega državnega tožilstva kot „pravosodnega organa“, zlasti glede na sodbe z dne 10. novembra 2016, Poltorak (C‑452/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:858), in z dne 10. novembra 2016, Özçelik (C‑453/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:860).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "centralnega irskega organa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (višje sodišče)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "državno tožilstvo v Lübecku"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "državno tožilstvo v Lübecku"->"High Court (višje sodišče)"[label="Odgovor 08/12/2016"];
  "centralnega irskega organa"->"državno tožilstvo v Lübecku";
  "High Court (višje sodišče)"->"pridobilo dodatne informacije";
  "pridobilo dodatne informacije"->"centralnega irskega organa";
  "pridobilo dodatne informacije"->"Opredelitev tega državnega tožilstva kot „pravosodnega organa“, zlasti glede na sodbe z dne 10. novembra 2016, Poltorak, in z dne 10. novembra 2016, Özçelik"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Väitteensä tueksi OG esitti saksalaisen asianajajan antaman asiantuntijalausunnon, jonka mukaan syyttäjäviranomaisella ei ole Saksan oikeudessa tuomioistuimen kaltaista riippumatonta tai itsenäistä asemaa, vaan se kuuluu oikeusministerin alaiseen hallintohierarkiaan, mikä tarkoittaa sitä, että on olemassa vaara siitä, että luovutusmenettelyihin puututaan poliittisin perustein. Lausunnon mukaan virallinen syyttäjä ei ole myöskään sellainen oikeusviranomainen, jolla on toimivalta määrätä henkilön vangitsemisesta tai pidättämisestä, poikkeustapauksia lukuun ottamatta. Vain tuomarilla tai tuomioistuimella on tämä toimivalta. Virallisella syyttäjällä on sen sijaan toimivalta panna täytäntöön tuomarin tai tuomioistuimen antama kansallinen pidätysmääräys antamalla tarvittaessa eurooppalainen pidätysmääräys. Mikään puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen ei siis ole osallistunut OG:tä koskevan eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen antamiseen.
High Court kääntyi näin ollen Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomaisen puoleen Irlannin valtion keskusviranomaisen välityksellä saadakseen lisätietoja niistä seikoista, jotka OG oli ilmoittanut tämän syyttäjäviranomaisen asemasta oikeusviranomaisena, erityisesti 10.11.2016 annetun tuomion Poltorak (C‑452/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:858) ja 10.11.2016 annetun tuomion Özçelik (C‑453/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:860) kannalta tarkasteltuna.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Irlannin valtion keskusviranomaisen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomaisen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomaisen"->"High Court"[label="Väitteensä tueksi OG esitti saksalaisen asianajajan antaman asiantuntijalausunnon 08/12/2016"];
  "Irlannin valtion keskusviranomaisen"->"Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomaisen";
  "High Court"->"saadakseen lisätietoja";
  "saadakseen lisätietoja"->"Irlannin valtion keskusviranomaisen";
  "saadakseen lisätietoja"->"OG oli ilmoittanut tämän syyttäjäviranomaisen asemasta oikeusviranomaisena, erityisesti 10.11.2016 annetun tuomion Poltorak (C‑452/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:858) ja 10.11.2016 annetun tuomion Özçelik (C‑453/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:860) kannalta tarkasteltuna., Özçelik"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Till stöd för sin sak åberopade OG ett rättsutlåtande som hade upprättats av en tysk advokat. Detta rättsutlåtande ger enligt OG bland annat vid handen att enligt tysk rätt har åklagarmyndigheten inte någon självständig eller oavhängig ställning såsom domstol, utan omfattas av en administrativ hierarkisk ordning under ledning av justitieministern. Detta innebär att det finns en risk för politisk inblandning i överlämningsförfarandena. Enligt tysk rätt är åklagarmyndigheten dessutom inte en rättslig myndighet med behörighet att förordna om att ta personer i förvar eller häkta en person, utom i särskilda undantagsfall. Det är endast en domstol som har denna behörighet. Åklagarmyndigheten är å sin sida behörig att verkställa en nationell arresteringsorder som utfärdats av domstol, i förekommande fall genom att utfärda en europeisk arresteringsorder. Således har ingen ”rättslig myndighet” i den mening som avses i artikel 6.1 i rambeslut 2002/584 deltagit i handläggningen då den europeiska arresteringsordern utfärdades gentemot OG.
Mot denna bakgrund vände sig High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål) till åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck via den irländska centralmyndigheten med begäran om ytterligare upplysningar angående det som OG anfört om åklagarmyndighetens ställning såsom ”rättslig myndighet”, särskilt mot bakgrund av vad som slagits fast i dom av den 10 november 2016, Poltorak (C‑452/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:858), och dom av den 10 november 2016, Özçelik (C‑453/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:860).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "den irländska centralmyndigheten"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck"->"High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål)"[label="svar 08/12/2016"];
  "den irländska centralmyndigheten"->"åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck";
  "High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål)"->"begäran om ytterligare upplysningar";
  "begäran om ytterligare upplysningar"->"den irländska centralmyndigheten";
  "begäran om ytterligare upplysningar"->"åklagarmyndighetens ställning såsom ”rättslig myndighet”, särskilt mot bakgrund av vad som slagits fast i dom av den 10 november 2016, Poltorak (C‑452/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:858), och dom av den 10 november 2016, Özçelik (C‑453/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:860)., Özçelik"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

On 20 March 2017 the High Court rejected OG’s submission that the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Lübeck is not a ‘judicial authority’ within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584. In an appeal brought before the Court of Appeal (Ireland), the judgment of the High Court was upheld.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Court of Appeal (Ireland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "OG"->"Court of Appeal (Ireland)"[label="Appeal"];
   "Court of Appeal (Ireland)"->"The High Court"[label="Uphold the High Court decision"];
   "The High Court"->"Rejected 20/03/2017";
   "Rejected 20/03/2017"->"OG";
   "Rejected 20/03/2017"->"The Public Prosecutor’s Office in Lübeck is a ‘judicial authority’"[dir=none];
   "The Public Prosecutor’s Office in Lübeck is a ‘judicial authority’"->"Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 20 март 2017 г. High Court (Висш съд) отхвърля доводите на OG, изведени от факта, че прокуратурата на Любек не е съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584. Пред Court of Appeal (Апелативен съд, Ирландия) е подадена жалба срещу решението на High Court (Висш съд), която той потвърждава.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Апелативен съд (Ирландия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Апелативен съд (Ирландия)"[label="Апелативен съд"];
  "Court of Апелативен съд (Ирландия)"->"High Court"[label="потвърждава High Court решението"];
  "High Court"->"отхвърля 20/03/2017";
  "отхвърля 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "отхвърля 20/03/2017"->"прокуратурата на Любек е съдебен орган"[dir=none];
  "прокуратурата на Любек е съдебен орган"->"член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 20 de marzo de 2017, la High Court (Tribunal Superior) desestimó la alegación de OG de que la Fiscalía de Lübeck no era una «autoridad judicial» en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584. Esta sentencia de la High Court (Tribunal Superior) fue recurrida ante la Court of Appeal (Tribunal de Apelación, Irlanda), que la confirmó.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Irlanda)"[label="Tribunal de Apelación"];
  "Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Irlanda)"->"High Court"[label="confirmó High Court Decisión Marco 2002/584"];
  "High Court"->"desestimó 20/03/2017";
  "desestimó 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "desestimó 20/03/2017"->"la Fiscalía de Lübeck era una «autoridad judicial»"[dir=none];
  "la Fiscalía de Lübeck era una «autoridad judicial»"->"artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dne 20. března 2017 High Court (Vrchní soud) odmítl argument OG, že státní zastupitelství v Lübecku není „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584. Proti tomuto rozsudku High Court (Vrchní soud) bylo podáno odvolání ke Court of Appeal (Odvolací soud, Irsko), který uvedený rozsudek potvrdil.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Odvolací soud (Irsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Odvolací soud (Irsko)"[label="Odvolací soud"];
  "Court of Odvolací soud (Irsko)"->"High Court"[label="rozsudek potvrdil High Court rozsudek"];
  "High Court"->"odmítl 20/03/2017";
  "odmítl 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "odmítl 20/03/2017"->"státní zastupitelství v Lübecku není „justičním orgánem“"[dir=none];
  "státní zastupitelství v Lübecku není „justičním orgánem“"->"čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den 20. marts 2017 forkastede High Court (ret i første instans) OG’s anbringende om, at anklagemyndigheden i Lübeck ikke er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584. Court of Appeal (appeldomstol, Irland) behandlede appellen af denne dom afsagt af High Court (ret i første instans), som den stadfæstede.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of appellen (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of appellen (Irland)"[label="appellen"];
  "Court of appellen (Irland)"->"High Court"[label="som den stadfæstede. High Court dom"];
  "High Court"->"forkastede 20/03/2017";
  "forkastede 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "forkastede 20/03/2017"->"anklagemyndigheden i Lübeck er en »judiciel myndighed«"[dir=none];
  "anklagemyndigheden i Lübeck er en »judiciel myndighed«"->"artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

Am 20. März 2017 wies der High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) das Vorbringen von OG zurück, dass die Staatsanwaltschaft Lübeck keine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 sei. Der Court of Appeal (Berufungsgerichtshof, Irland), bei dem ein Rechtsmittel gegen das Urteil des High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) eingelegt wurde, bestätigte dessen Urteil.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Irland)"[label="Berufungsgerichtshof"];
  "Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Irland)"->"High Court"[label="Urteil bestätigte High Court Urteil"];
  "High Court"->"wies das Vorbringen von OG zurück 20/03/2017";
  "wies das Vorbringen von OG zurück 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "wies das Vorbringen von OG zurück 20/03/2017"->"die Staatsanwaltschaft Lübeck keine „Justizbehörde“"[dir=none];
  "die Staatsanwaltschaft Lübeck keine „Justizbehörde“"->"Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

High Court (kõrge kohus) lükkas 20. märtsil 2017 tagasi OG argmendi, mille kohaselt ei ole Lübecki prokuratuur raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses „õigusasutus“. Court of Appealile (apellatsioonikohus, Iirimaa) esitati High Courti (kõrge kohus) otsuse peale apellatsioonkaebus, mille ta jättis rahuldamata.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of apellatsioonkaebus (Iirimaa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of apellatsioonkaebus (Iirimaa)"[label="apellatsioonkaebus"];
  "Court of apellatsioonkaebus (Iirimaa)"->"High Court"[label="jättis rahuldamata. High Court otsuse"];
  "High Court"->"lükkas tagasi 20/03/2017";
  "lükkas tagasi 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "lükkas tagasi 20/03/2017"->"Lübecki prokuratuur on raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses „õigusasutus“"[dir=none];
  "Lübecki prokuratuur on raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses „õigusasutus“"->"raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 20 Μαρτίου 2017, το High Court (ανώτερο δικαστήριο) απέρριψε το επιχείρημα του OG ότι η εισαγγελία του Lübeck δεν είναι «δικαστική αρχή» κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584. Το Court of Appeal (εφετείο, Ιρλανδία) επιλήφθηκε εφέσεως η οποία ασκήθηκε κατά της ως άνω αποφάσεως του High Court (ανώτερου δικαστηρίου) την οποία επικύρωσε.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of εφετείο (Ιρλανδία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of εφετείο (Ιρλανδία)"[label="εφετείο"];
  "Court of εφετείο (Ιρλανδία)"->"High Court"[label="επικύρωσε High Court αποφάσεως"];
  "High Court"->"απέρριψε 20/03/2017";
  "απέρριψε 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "απέρριψε 20/03/2017"->"η εισαγγελία του Lübeck δεν είναι «δικαστική αρχή»"[dir=none];
  "η εισαγγελία του Lübeck δεν είναι «δικαστική αρχή»"->"άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

Le 20 mars 2017, la High Court (Haute Cour) a rejeté l’argument d’OG tiré du fait que le parquet de Lübeck n’est pas une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584. La Court of Appeal (Cour d’appel, Irlande) a été saisie d’un recours contre cet arrêt de la High Court (Haute Cour), qu’elle a confirmé.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Cour d’appel (Irlande)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Cour d’appel (Irlande)"[label="Cour d’appel"];
  "Court of Cour d’appel (Irlande)"->"High Court"[label="a confirmé High Court décision-cadre 2002/584"];
  "High Court"->"a rejeté 20/03/2017";
  "a rejeté 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "a rejeté 20/03/2017"->"le parquet de Lübeck est une « autorité judiciaire »"[dir=none];
  "le parquet de Lübeck est une « autorité judiciaire »"->"l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584. 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

High Court (Visoki sud) je 20. ožujka 2017. odbacio argument osobe OG o tome da Državno odvjetništvo u Lübecku nije „pravosudno tijelo” u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. Okvirne odluke 2002/584. Protiv te presude High Courta (Visoki sud) podnesena je žalba Court of Appealu (Žalbeni sud, Irska), koji je potvrdio predmetnu presudu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Žalba (Irska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Žalba (Irska)"[label="Žalba"];
  "Court of Žalba (Irska)"->"High Court"[label="potvrdio predmetnu presudu. High Court presuda"];
  "High Court"->"odbacio 20/03/2017";
  "odbacio 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "odbacio 20/03/2017"->"Državno odvjetništvo u Lübecku je „pravosudno tijelo”"[dir=none];
  "Državno odvjetništvo u Lübecku je „pravosudno tijelo”"->"članka 6. stavka 1. Okvirne odluke 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 20 marzo 2017 la High Court (Alta Corte) ha respinto l’argomento di OG vertente sul fatto che la procura di Lubecca non è un’«autorità giudiziaria», ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584. La Court of Appeal (Corte d’appello, Irlanda), adita con ricorso avverso la sentenza della High Court (Alta Corte), ha confermato detta sentenza.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Corte d’appello (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Corte d’appello (Irlanda)"[label="Corte d’appello"];
  "Court of Corte d’appello (Irlanda)"->"High Court"[label="ha confermato detta sentenza. High Court decisione"];
  "High Court"->"ha respinto 20/03/2017";
  "ha respinto 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "ha respinto 20/03/2017"->"la procura di Lubecca è un’«autorità giudiziaria»"[dir=none];
  "la procura di Lubecca è un’«autorità giudiziaria»"->"articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

 	

2017. gada 20. martāHigh Court (Augstā tiesa) noraidīja OG argumentu par to, ka Lībekas prokuratūra nav “tiesu iestāde” Pamatlēmuma 2002/584 6. panta 1. punkta izpratnē. Par šo High Court (Augstā tiesa) spriedumu tika iesniegta apelācijas sūdzība Court of Appeal (Apelācijas tiesa, Īrija), kura apstiprināja minēto spriedumu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of apelācijas sūdzība Court of Appeal (Īrija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of apelācijas sūdzība Court of Appeal (Īrija)"[label="apelācijas sūdzība Court of Appeal"];
  "Court of apelācijas sūdzība Court of Appeal (Īrija)"->"High Court"[label="apstiprināja minēto spriedumu. High Court spriedumu"];
  "High Court"->"noraidīja 20/03/2017";
  "noraidīja 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "noraidīja 20/03/2017"->"Lībekas prokuratūra ir “tiesu iestāde”"[dir=none];
  "Lībekas prokuratūra ir “tiesu iestāde”"->"Pamatlēmuma 2002/584 6. panta 1. punkta 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2017 m. kovo 20 d.High Court (Aukštasis teismas) atmetė OG argumentą, kad Liubeko prokuratūra nėra „teisminė institucija“, kaip tai suprantama pagal Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 6 straipsnio 1 dalį. Court of Appeal (Apeliacinis teismas, Airija), kuriam dėl šio High Court (Aukštasis teismas) sprendimo pateiktas apeliacinis skundas, patvirtino teismo sprendimą.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Apeliacinis (Airija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Apeliacinis (Airija)"[label="Apeliacinis"];
  "Court of Apeliacinis (Airija)"->"High Court"[label="patvirtino teismo sprendimą. High Court sprendimas"];
  "High Court"->"atmetė 20/03/2017";
  "atmetė 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "atmetė 20/03/2017"->"Liubeko prokuratūra yra „teisminė institucija“"[dir=none];
  "Liubeko prokuratūra yra „teisminė institucija“"->"Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 6 straipsnio 1 dalį. 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2017. március 20‑án a High Court (felsőbíróság) elutasította OG arra vonatkozó érvét, hogy a lübecki ügyészség nem a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése értelmében vett „igazságügyi hatóság”. OG fellebbezést terjesztett a Court of Appeal (fellebbviteli bíróság, Írország) elé a High Court (felsőbíróság) ezen ítélete ellen, amelyet a Court of Appeal helybenhagyott.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of fellebbezést (Írország)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of fellebbezést (Írország)"[label="fellebbezést"];
  "Court of fellebbezést (Írország)"->"High Court"[label="helybenhagyott. High Court ítélete"];
  "High Court"->"elutasította 20/03/2017";
  "elutasította 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "elutasította 20/03/2017"->"a lübecki ügyészség „igazságügyi hatóság”"[dir=none];
  "a lübecki ügyészség „igazságügyi hatóság”"->"2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fl-20 ta’ Marzu 2017, il-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) ċaħdet l-argument ta’ OG ibbażat fuq il-fatt li l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Lübeck ma huwiex “awtorità ġudizzjarja” fis-sens tal-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584. Il-Court of Appeal (il-Qorti tal-Appell, l-Irlanda) ġiet adita b’appell minn din is-sentenza tal-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja), li hija kkonfermat.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appell (l-Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Appell (l-Irlanda)"[label="Appell"];
  "Court of Appell (l-Irlanda)"->"High Court"[label="kkonfermat High Court Deċiżjoni"];
  "High Court"->"ċaħdet 20/03/2017";
  "ċaħdet 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "ċaħdet 20/03/2017"->"l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Lübeck ma huwiex “awtorità ġudizzjarja”"[dir=none];
  "l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Lübeck ma huwiex “awtorità ġudizzjarja”"->"Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

De High Court verwierp op 20 maart 2017 het argument van OG dat het openbaar ministerie van Lübeck niet als „rechterlijke autoriteit” kan worden aangemerkt in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584. De Court of Appeal (rechter in tweede aanleg, Ierland), waarbij hoger beroep aanhangig is gemaakt, heeft het vonnis van de High Court bevestigd.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Hoger beroep (Ierland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Hoger beroep (Ierland)"[label="Hoger beroep"];
  "Court of Hoger beroep (Ierland)"->"High Court"[label="heeft het vonnis van de High Court bevestigd. High Court het vonnis van de High Court"];
  "High Court"->"verwierp 20/03/2017";
  "verwierp 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "verwierp 20/03/2017"->"het openbaar ministerie van Lübeck als „rechterlijke autoriteit” kan worden aangemerkt"[dir=none];
  "het openbaar ministerie van Lübeck als „rechterlijke autoriteit” kan worden aangemerkt"->"artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 20 marca 2017 r. High Court (wysoki trybunał) oddalił argument OG dotyczący okoliczności, że prokuratura w Lubece nie jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584. Od tego wyroku High Court (wysokiego trybunału, Irlandia) zostało złożone odwołanie do Court of Appeal (sądu apelacyjnego, Irlandia), który utrzymał wspomniany wyrok w mocy.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of odwołanie (Irlandia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of odwołanie (Irlandia)"[label="odwołanie"];
  "Court of odwołanie (Irlandia)"->"High Court"[label="utrzymał wspomniany wyrok w mocy. High Court wyrok"];
  "High Court"->"oddalił 20/03/2017";
  "oddalił 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "oddalił 20/03/2017"->"prokuratura w Lubece jest „organem sądowym”"[dir=none];
  "prokuratura w Lubece jest „organem sądowym”"->"art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 20 de março de 2017, a High Court (Tribunal Superior) rejeitou o argumento de OG relativo ao facto de a Procuradoria de Lübeck não ser uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584. Foi interposto recurso dessa decisão da High Court (Tribunal Superior) na Court of Appeal (Tribunal de Recurso, Irlanda), que esta confirmou.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of recurso (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of recurso (Irlanda)"[label="recurso"];
  "Court of recurso (Irlanda)"->"High Court"[label="que esta confirmou. High Court decisão"];
  "High Court"->"rejeitou 20/03/2017";
  "rejeitou 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "rejeitou 20/03/2017"->"a Procuradoria de Lübeck é uma «autoridade judiciária»"[dir=none];
  "a Procuradoria de Lübeck é uma «autoridade judiciária»"->"artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 20 martie 2017, High Court (Înalta Curte) a respins argumentul lui OG care se întemeia pe faptul că Parchetul din Lübeck nu este o „autoritate judiciară” în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584. Court of Appeal (Curtea de Apel, Irlanda) a fost sesizată cu o cale de atac împotriva acestei hotărâri a High Court (Înalta Curte), pe care a confirmat‑o.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Curtea de Apel (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Curtea de Apel (Irlanda)"[label="Curtea de Apel"];
  "Court of Curtea de Apel (Irlanda)"->"High Court"[label="a confirmat-o High Court hotărâri"];
  "High Court"->"a respins 20/03/2017";
  "a respins 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "a respins 20/03/2017"->"Parchetul din Lübeck este o „autoritate judiciară”"[dir=none];
  "Parchetul din Lübeck este o „autoritate judiciară”"->"articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decisia‑cadru 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 20. marca 2017 High Court (Vyšší súd) odmietol tvrdenie OG, že prokuratúra v Lübecku nie je „súdnym orgánom“ v zmysle článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584. Court of Appeal (Odvolací súd, Írsko) rozhodoval o odvolaní, ktoré bolo podané proti tomuto rozsudku High Court (Vyšší súd), pričom rozsudok potvrdil.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Odvolací súd (Írsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Odvolací súd (Írsko)"[label="Odvolací súd"];
  "Court of Odvolací súd (Írsko)"->"High Court"[label="rozsudok potvrdil High Court rozsudok"];
  "High Court"->"odmietol 20/03/2017";
  "odmietol 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "odmietol 20/03/2017"->"prokuratúra v Lübecku je „súdnym orgánom“"[dir=none];
  "prokuratúra v Lübecku je „súdnym orgánom“"->"článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

High Court (višje sodišče) je 20. marca 2017 zavrnilo trditev OG, da državno tožilstvo v Lübecku ni „pravosodni organ“ v smislu člena 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584. Court of Appeal (pritožbeno sodišče, Irska) je 20. marca 2017 prejelo pritožbo zoper to sodbo High Court (višje sodišče), ki jo je potrdilo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of pritožbo (Irska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of pritožbo (Irska)"[label="pritožbo"];
  "Court of pritožbo (Irska)"->"High Court"[label="ki jo je potrdilo. High Court sodbo"];
  "High Court"->"zavrnilo 20/03/2017";
  "zavrnilo 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "zavrnilo 20/03/2017"->"državno tožilstvo v Lübecku je"pravosodni organ"[dir=none];
  "državno tožilstvo v Lübecku je"pravosodni organ"->"člena 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584"[dir=none];
}