mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 27 de febrero de 2017, la High Court (Tribunal Superior) declaró que el Fiscal General de Lituania era una «autoridad judicial», en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584, y ordenó la entrega de PF.
Mediante sentencia de 20 de octubre de 2017, la Court of Appeal (Tribunal de Apelación, Irlanda) desestimó el recurso interpuesto por PF contra la sentencia de la High Court (Tribunal Superior) y confirmó que el Fiscal General de Lituania era una «autoridad judicial», en el sentido de esa disposición.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Irlanda)"->"PF"[label="sentencia de 20 de octubre de 2017, la Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Tribunal de Apelación, Irlanda) desestimó el recurso interpuesto por PF"];
  "PF"->"Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Irlanda)"[label="Tribunal de Apelación"];
  "High Court"->"El 27 de febrero de 2017, la High Court (Tribunal Superior) declaró que el Fiscal General de Lituania era una «autoridad judicial», en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584, y ordenó la entrega de PF.";
  "El 27 de febrero de 2017, la High Court (Tribunal Superior) declaró que el Fiscal General de Lituania era una «autoridad judicial», en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584, y ordenó la entrega de PF."->"PF";
  "El 27 de febrero de 2017, la High Court (Tribunal Superior) declaró que el Fiscal General de Lituania era una «autoridad judicial», en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584, y ordenó la entrega de PF."->"el Fiscal General de Lituania era una «autoridad judicial», en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dne 27. února 2017 High Court (Vrchní soud) rozhodl, že nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy je „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584, a nařídil předání PF.
Rozsudkem ze dne 20. října 2017 Court of Appeal (Odvolací soud, Irsko) zamítl odvolání PF proti rozsudku High Court (Vrchní soud) a potvrdil, že nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy je „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu uvedeného ustanovení.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Odvolací soud (Irsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Odvolací soud (Irsko)"->"PF"[label="Rozsudkem ze dne 20. října 2017"];
  "PF"->"Court of Odvolací soud (Irsko)"[label="Odvolací soud"];
  "High Court"->"Dne 27. února 2017 High Court (Vrchní soud) rozhodl, že nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy je „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584, a nařídil předání PF.";
  "Dne 27. února 2017 High Court (Vrchní soud) rozhodl, že nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy je „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584, a nařídil předání PF."->"PF";
  "Dne 27. února 2017 High Court (Vrchní soud) rozhodl, že nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy je „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584, a nařídil předání PF."->"nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy je „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den 27. februar 2017 fastslog High Court (ret i første instans), at Litauens øverste anklager er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584, og traf afgørelse om overgivelse af PF.
Ved dom af 20. oktober 2017 forkastede Court of Appeal (appeldomstol, Irland) PF’s appel af dommen fra High Court (ret i første instans) og bekræftede, at Litauens øverste anklager er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i denne bestemmelse.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of appel (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of appel (Irland)"->"PF"[label="Ved dom af 20. oktober 2017 forkastede Court of appel"];
  "PF"->"Court of appel (Irland)"[label="appel"];
  "High Court"->"Den 27. februar 2017 fastslog High Court (ret i første instans), at Litauens øverste anklager er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584, og traf afgørelse om overgivelse af PF.";
  "Den 27. februar 2017 fastslog High Court (ret i første instans), at Litauens øverste anklager er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584, og traf afgørelse om overgivelse af PF."->"PF";
  "Den 27. februar 2017 fastslog High Court (ret i første instans), at Litauens øverste anklager er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584, og traf afgørelse om overgivelse af PF."->"Litauens øverste anklager er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: German

Am 27. Februar 2017 entschied der High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof), dass der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen eine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 sei, und ordnete die Übergabe von PF an.
Mit Urteil vom 20. Oktober 2017 wies der Court of Appeal (Berufungsgerichtshof, Irland) das Rechtsmittel von PF gegen das Urteil des High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) zurück und bestätigte, dass der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen eine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne der genannten Bestimmung sei.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Irland)"->"PF"[label="Mit Urteil vom 20. Oktober 2017 wies der Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Berufungsgerichtshof, Irland) das Rechtsmittel von PF gegen das Urteil des High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) zurück"];
  "PF"->"Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Irland)"[label="Berufungsgerichtshof"];
  "High Court"->"Am 27. Februar 2017 entschied der High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof), dass der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen eine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 sei, und ordnete die Übergabe von PF an.";
  "Am 27. Februar 2017 entschied der High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof), dass der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen eine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 sei, und ordnete die Übergabe von PF an."->"PF";
  "Am 27. Februar 2017 entschied der High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof), dass der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen eine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 sei, und ordnete die Übergabe von PF an."->"dass der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen eine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 sei"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

High Court (kõrge kohus) otsustas 27. veebruaril 2017, et Leedu peaprokurör on „õigusasutus“ raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses ning määras PF-i üleandmise.
Court of Appeal (apellatsioonikohus, Iirimaa) jättis 20. oktoobri 2017. aasta otsusega rahuldamata kaebuse, mille PF oli esitanud High Courti (kõrge kohus) otsuse peale, ning kinnitas, et Leedu peaprokurör on „õigusasutus“ selle sätte tähenduses.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of apellatsioonikohus (Iirimaa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of apellatsioonikohus (Iirimaa)"->"PF"[label="20. oktoobri 2017. aasta otsusega rahuldamata"];
  "PF"->"Court of apellatsioonikohus (Iirimaa)"[label="apellatsioonikohus"];
  "High Court"->"otsustas 27. veebruaril 2017";
  "otsustas 27. veebruaril 2017"->"PF";
  "otsustas 27. veebruaril 2017"->"Leedu peaprokurör on „õigusasutus“ raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 27 Φεβρουαρίου 2017, το High Court (ανώτερο δικαστήριο) έκρινε ότι ο γενικός εισαγγελέας της Λιθουανίας αποτελεί «δικαστική αρχή» κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584 και διέταξε την παράδοση του PF.
Με απόφαση της 20ής Οκτωβρίου 2017, το Court of Appeal (εφετείο, Ιρλανδία) απέρριψε την έφεση του PF κατά της αποφάσεως του High Court (ανώτερου δικαστηρίου) και επιβεβαίωσε ότι ο γενικός εισαγγελέας της Λιθουανίας αποτελεί «δικαστική αρχή» κατά την έννοια της διατάξεως αυτής.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of εφετείο (Ιρλανδία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of εφετείο (Ιρλανδία)"->"PF"[label="Με απόφαση της 20ής Οκτωβρίου 2017, το Court of εφετείο (εφετείο, Ιρλανδία) απέρριψε την έφεση του PF"];
  "PF"->"Court of εφετείο (Ιρλανδία)"[label="εφετείο"];
  "High Court"->"Στις 27 Φεβρουαρίου 2017";
  "Στις 27 Φεβρουαρίου 2017"->"PF";
  "Στις 27 Φεβρουαρίου 2017"->"ο γενικός εισαγγελέας της Λιθουανίας αποτελεί «δικαστική αρχή» κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: French

Le 27 février 2017, la High Court (Haute Cour) a jugé que le procureur général de Lituanie était une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584, et a ordonné la remise de PF.
Par un arrêt du 20 octobre 2017, la Court of Appeal (Cour d’appel, Irlande) a rejeté le recours de PF contre le jugement de la High Court (Haute Cour) et a confirmé que le procureur général de Lituanie est une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de cette disposition.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Cour d’appel (Irlande)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Cour d’appel (Irlande)"->"PF"[label="Par un arrêt du 20 octobre 2017, la Court of Cour d’appel (Cour d’appel, Irlande) a rejeté le recours de PF"];
  "PF"->"Court of Cour d’appel (Irlande)"[label="Cour d’appel"];
  "High Court"->"Le 27 février 2017, la High Court (Haute Cour) a jugé que le procureur général de Lituanie était une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584, et a ordonné la remise de PF.";
  "Le 27 février 2017, la High Court (Haute Cour) a jugé que le procureur général de Lituanie était une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584, et a ordonné la remise de PF."->"PF";
  "Le 27 février 2017, la High Court (Haute Cour) a jugé que le procureur général de Lituanie était une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584, et a ordonné la remise de PF."->"le procureur général de Lituanie est une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

High Court (Visoki sud) je 27. veljače 2017. presudio da je Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve „pravosudno tijelo” u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. Okvirne odluke 2002/584 te je odredio predaju osobe PF.
Court of Appeal (Žalbeni sud, Irska) presudom od 20. listopada 2017. odbio je žalbu osobe PF protiv presude High Courta (Visoki sud) te je potvrdio da je Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve „pravosudno tijelo” u smislu te odredbe.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Žalbeni sud (Irska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Žalbeni sud (Irska)"->"PF"[label="odbio je žalbu osobe PF protiv presude High Courta (Visoki sud) 20. listopada 2017."];
  "PF"->"Court of Žalbeni sud (Irska)"[label="Žalbeni sud"];
  "High Court"->"Visoki sud je 27. veljače 2017. presudio";
  "Visoki sud je 27. veljače 2017. presudio"->"PF";
  "Visoki sud je 27. veljače 2017. presudio"->"Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve „pravosudno tijelo” u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. Okvirne odluke 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 27 febbraio 2017, la High Court (Alta Corte) ha dichiarato che il procuratore generale di Lituania era un’«autorità giudiziaria», ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584, e ha ordinato la consegna di PF.
Con sentenza del 20 ottobre 2017, la Court of Appeal (Corte d’appello, Irlanda) ha respinto il ricorso di PF avverso la sentenza della High Court (Alta Corte) e ha confermato che il procuratore generale di Lituania è un’«autorità giudiziaria» ai sensi della suddetta disposizione.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Corte d’appello (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Corte d’appello (Irlanda)"->"PF"[label="Con sentenza del 20 ottobre 2017, la Court of Corte d’appello (Corte d’appello, Irlanda) ha respinto il ricorso di PF avverso la sentenza della High Court (Alta Corte)"];
  "PF"->"Court of Corte d’appello (Irlanda)"[label="Corte d’appello"];
  "High Court"->"Il 27 febbraio 2017, la High Court (Alta Corte) ha dichiarato che il procuratore generale di Lituania era un’«autorità giudiziaria», ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584, e ha ordinato la consegna di PF.";
  "Il 27 febbraio 2017, la High Court (Alta Corte) ha dichiarato che il procuratore generale di Lituania era un’«autorità giudiziaria», ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584, e ha ordinato la consegna di PF."->"PF";
  "Il 27 febbraio 2017, la High Court (Alta Corte) ha dichiarato che il procuratore generale di Lituania era un’«autorità giudiziaria», ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584, e ha ordinato la consegna di PF."->"il procuratore generale di Lituania è un’«autorità giudiziaria» ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

2017. gada 27. februārī High Court (Augstā tiesa) nosprieda, ka Lietuvas ģenerālprokurors ir “tiesu iestāde” Pamatlēmuma 2002/584 6. panta 1. punkta izpratnē un uzdeva veikt PF nodošanu.
Ar 2017. gada 20. oktobra spriedumu Court of Appeal (Apelācijas tiesa, Īrija) noraidīja PF apelācijas sūdzību par High Court (Augstā tiesa) spriedumu un apstiprināja, ka Lietuvas ģenerālprokurors ir “tiesu iestāde” minētās tiesību normas izpratnē.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Apelācijas tiesa (Īrija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Apelācijas tiesa (Īrija)"->"PF"[label="2017. gada 20. oktobra spriedumu Court of Apelācijas tiesa (Apelācijas tiesa, Īrija) noraidīja"];
  "PF"->"Court of Apelācijas tiesa (Īrija)"[label="Apelācijas tiesa"];
  "High Court"->"2017. gada 27. februārī";
  "2017. gada 27. februārī"->"PF";
  "2017. gada 27. februārī"->"Lietuvas ģenerālprokurors ir “tiesu iestāde” Pamatlēmuma 2002/584 6. panta 1. punkta izpratnē"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2017 m. vasario 27 d.High Court (Aukštasis teismas) nusprendė, kad Lietuvos generalinis prokuroras yra „teisminė institucija“, kaip tai suprantama pagal Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 6 straipsnio 1 dalį, ir nurodė perduoti PF Lietuvai.
2017 m. spalio 20 d. sprendimu Court of Appeal (Apeliacinis teismas, Airija) atmetė PF skundą dėl High Court (Aukštasis teismas) sprendimo ir patvirtino, kad Lietuvos generalinis prokuroras yra „teisminė institucija“, kaip tai suprantama pagal minėtą nuostatą.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Apeliacinis teismas (Airija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Apeliacinis teismas (Airija)"->"PF"[label="2017 m. spalio 20 d. sprendimu Court of Apeliacinis teismas (Apeliacinis teismas, Airija) atmetė"];
  "PF"->"Court of Apeliacinis teismas (Airija)"[label="Apeliacinis teismas"];
  "High Court"->"2017 m. vasario 27 d.";
  "2017 m. vasario 27 d."->"PF";
  "2017 m. vasario 27 d."->"Lietuvos generalinis prokuroras yra „teisminė institucija“, kaip tai suprantama pagal Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 6 straipsnio 1 dalį"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2017. február 27‑én a High Court (felsőbíróság) kimondta, hogy Litvánia főügyésze a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése szerinti „igazságügyi hatóság”, és elrendelte PF átadását.
2017. október 20‑i ítéletében a Court of Appeal (fellebbviteli bíróság, Írország) elutasította PF‑nek a High Court (felsőbíróság) ítéletével szemben benyújtott fellebbezését, és megerősítette, hogy Litvánia főügyésze e rendelkezés szerinti „igazságügyi hatóság”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of fellebbezését (Írország)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of fellebbezését (Írország)"->"PF"[label="2017. október 20‑i ítéletében a Court of fellebbezését (fellebbviteli bíróság, Írország) elutasította PF‑nek a High Court (felsőbíróság) ítéletével szemben benyújtott fellebbezését"];
  "PF"->"Court of fellebbezését (Írország)"[label="fellebbezését"];
  "High Court"->"2017. február 27‑én a High Court (felsőbíróság) kimondta, hogy Litvánia főügyésze a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése szerinti „igazságügyi hatóság”, és elrendelte PF átadását.";
  "2017. február 27‑én a High Court (felsőbíróság) kimondta, hogy Litvánia főügyésze a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése szerinti „igazságügyi hatóság”, és elrendelte PF átadását."->"PF";
  "2017. február 27‑én a High Court (felsőbíróság) kimondta, hogy Litvánia főügyésze a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése szerinti „igazságügyi hatóság”, és elrendelte PF átadását."->"Litvánia főügyésze a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése szerinti „igazságügyi hatóság”"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fis-27 ta’ Frar 2017, il-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) sostniet li l-Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja kien “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584 u ordnat il-konsenja ta’ PF.
Permezz tas-sentenza tal-20 ta’ Ottubru 2017, il-Court of Appeal (il-Qorti tal-Appell, l-Irlanda) ċaħdet l-appell ta’ PF mis-sentenza tal-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) u kkonfermat li l-Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja huwa “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira ta’ dik id-dispożizzjoni.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Appell (l-Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Appell (l-Irlanda)"->"PF"[label="Permezz tas-sentenza tal-20 ta’ Ottubru 2017"];
  "PF"->"Court of Appell (l-Irlanda)"[label="Appell"];
  "High Court"->"Fis-27 ta’ Frar 2017, il-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) sostniet li l-Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja kien “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584 u ordnat il-konsenja ta’ PF.";
  "Fis-27 ta’ Frar 2017, il-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) sostniet li l-Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja kien “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584 u ordnat il-konsenja ta’ PF."->"PF";
  "Fis-27 ta’ Frar 2017, il-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) sostniet li l-Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja kien “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584 u ordnat il-konsenja ta’ PF."->"l-Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja huwa “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira ta’ dik id-dispożizzjoni."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 27 februari 2017 heeft de High Court geoordeeld dat de procureur-generaal van Litouwen een „rechterlijke autoriteit” in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 is en heeft hij de overlevering van PF bevolen.
In een arrest van 20 oktober 2017 heeft de Court of Appeal (rechter in tweede aanleg, Ierland) het hoger beroep van PF tegen het vonnis van de High Court verworpen en bevestigd dat de procureur-generaal van Litouwen een „rechterlijke autoriteit” is in de zin van die bepaling.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of hoger beroep (Ierland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of hoger beroep (Ierland)"->"PF"[label="In een arrest van 20 oktober 2017 heeft de Court of hoger beroep (rechter in tweede aanleg, Ierland) het hoger beroep van PF tegen het vonnis van de High Court verworpen"];
  "PF"->"Court of hoger beroep (Ierland)"[label="hoger beroep"];
  "High Court"->"Op 27 februari 2017 heeft de High Court geoordeeld dat de procureur-generaal van Litouwen een „rechterlijke autoriteit” in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 is en heeft hij de overlevering van PF bevolen.";
  "Op 27 februari 2017 heeft de High Court geoordeeld dat de procureur-generaal van Litouwen een „rechterlijke autoriteit” in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 is en heeft hij de overlevering van PF bevolen."->"PF";
  "Op 27 februari 2017 heeft de High Court geoordeeld dat de procureur-generaal van Litouwen een „rechterlijke autoriteit” in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 is en heeft hij de overlevering van PF bevolen."->"de procureur-generaal van Litouwen een „rechterlijke autoriteit” in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 is"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 27 lutego 2017 r. High Court (wysoki trybunał) orzekł, że prokurator generalny Litwy jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584 i zarządził przekazanie PF.
Wyrokiem z dnia 20 października 2017 r. Court of Appeal (sąd apelacyjny, Irlandia) oddalił odwołanie PF od wyroku High Court (wysokiego trybunału) i potwierdził, że prokurator generalny Litwy jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu tego przepisu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of odwołanie (Irlandia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of odwołanie (Irlandia)"->"PF"[label="Wyrokiem z dnia 20 października 2017 r. Court of odwołanie (sąd apelacyjny, Irlandia) oddalił odwołanie PF"];
  "PF"->"Court of odwołanie (Irlandia)"[label="odwołanie"];
  "High Court"->"W dniu 27 lutego 2017 r. High Court (wysoki trybunał) orzekł, że prokurator generalny Litwy jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584 i zarządził przekazanie PF.";
  "W dniu 27 lutego 2017 r. High Court (wysoki trybunał) orzekł, że prokurator generalny Litwy jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584 i zarządził przekazanie PF."->"PF";
  "W dniu 27 lutego 2017 r. High Court (wysoki trybunał) orzekł, że prokurator generalny Litwy jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584 i zarządził przekazanie PF."->"prokurator generalny Litwy jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 27 de fevereiro de 2017, a High Court (Tribunal Superior) declarou que o Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia era uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584, e ordenou a entrega de PF.
Por Acórdão de 20 de outubro de 2017, a Court of Appeal (Tribunal de Recurso, Irlanda) negou provimento ao recurso de PF contra a decisão da High Court (Tribunal Superior) e confirmou que o Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia é uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção desta disposição.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Recurso (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Recurso (Irlanda)"->"PF"[label="Por Acórdão de 20 de outubro de 2017"];
  "PF"->"Court of Recurso (Irlanda)"[label="Recurso"];
  "High Court"->"Em 27 de fevereiro de 2017, a High Court (Tribunal Superior) declarou que o Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia era uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584, e ordenou a entrega de PF.";
  "Em 27 de fevereiro de 2017, a High Court (Tribunal Superior) declarou que o Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia era uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584, e ordenou a entrega de PF."->"PF";
  "Em 27 de fevereiro de 2017, a High Court (Tribunal Superior) declarou que o Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia era uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584, e ordenou a entrega de PF."->"o Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia era uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 27 februarie 2017, High Court (Înalta Curte) a statuat că procurorul general al Lituaniei era o „autoritate judiciară”, în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584, și a dispus predarea lui PF.
Printr‑o hotărâre din 20 octombrie 2017, Court of Appeal (Curtea de Apel, Irlanda) a respins acțiunea lui PF împotriva hotărârii High Court (Înalta Curte) și a confirmat că procurorul general al Lituaniei este o „autoritate judiciară” în sensul acestei dispoziții.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Apel (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Apel (Irlanda)"->"PF"[label="Printr‑o hotărâre din 20 octombrie 2017, Court of Apel (Curtea de Apel, Irlanda) a respins acțiunea lui PF"];
  "PF"->"Court of Apel (Irlanda)"[label="Apel"];
  "High Court"->"La 27 februarie 2017, High Court (Înalta Curte) a statuat că procurorul general al Lituaniei era o „autoritate judiciară”, în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584, și a dispus predarea lui PF.";
  "La 27 februarie 2017, High Court (Înalta Curte) a statuat că procurorul general al Lituaniei era o „autoritate judiciară”, în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584, și a dispus predarea lui PF."->"PF";
  "La 27 februarie 2017, High Court (Înalta Curte) a statuat că procurorul general al Lituaniei era o „autoritate judiciară”, în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584, și a dispus predarea lui PF."->"procurorul general al Lituaniei era o „autoritate judiciară”, în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 27. februára 2017 High Court (Vyšší súd) rozhodol, že Generálna prokuratúra Litvy je „súdny orgán“ v zmysle článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584, a nariadil odovzdanie PF.
Rozsudkom z 20. októbra 2017 Court of Appeal (Odvolací súd, Írsko) zamietol odvolanie PF proti rozsudku High Court (Vyšší súd) a potvrdil, že Generálna prokuratúra Litvy je „súdny orgán“ v zmysle tohto ustanovenia.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Odvolací súd (Írsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Odvolací súd (Írsko)"->"PF"[label="Rozsudkom z 20. októbra 2017 Court of Odvolací súd (Odvolací súd, Írsko) zamietol"];
  "PF"->"Court of Odvolací súd (Írsko)"[label="Odvolací súd"];
  "High Court"->"Dňa 27. februára 2017 High Court (Vyšší súd) rozhodol";
  "Dňa 27. februára 2017 High Court (Vyšší súd) rozhodol"->"PF";
  "Dňa 27. februára 2017 High Court (Vyšší súd) rozhodol"->"Generálna prokuratúra Litvy je „súdny orgán“ v zmysle článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

High Court (višje sodišče) je 27. februarja 2017 razsodilo, da je generalni državni tožilec Litve „pravosodni organ“ v smislu člena 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584 in je odredilo predajo PF.
Court of Appeal (pritožbeno sodišče, Irska) je s sodbo z dne 20. oktobra 2017 zavrnilo pritožbo PF zoper sodbo High Court (višje sodišče) in potrdilo, da je generalni državni tožilec Litve „pravosodni organ“ v smislu te določbe.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of pritožbeno sodišče (Irska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of pritožbeno sodišče (Irska)"->"PF"[label="s sodbo z dne 20. oktobra 2017 zavrnilo pritožbo PF"];
  "PF"->"Court of pritožbeno sodišče (Irska)"[label="pritožbeno sodišče"];
  "High Court"->"27. februarja 2017";
  "27. februarja 2017"->"PF";
  "27. februarja 2017"->"generalni državni tožilec Litve je „pravosodni organ“ v smislu člena 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

High Court katsoi 27.2.2017 antamassaan ratkaisussa, että Liettuan syyttäjäviranomainen oli puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen, ja määräsi PF:n luovutettavaksi.
Court of Appeal (ylioikeus, Irlanti) hylkäsi 20.10.2017 antamallaan ratkaisulla PF:n valituksen High Courtin ratkaisusta ja vahvisti kannan, jonka mukaan Liettuan syyttäjäviranomainen on mainitussa säännöksessä tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of valituksen (Irlanti)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of valituksen (Irlanti)"->"PF"[label="hylkäsi 20.10.2017"];
  "PF"->"Court of valituksen (Irlanti)"[label="valituksen"];
  "High Court"->"High Court katsoi 27.2.2017 antamassaan ratkaisussa";
  "High Court katsoi 27.2.2017 antamassaan ratkaisussa"->"PF";
  "High Court katsoi 27.2.2017 antamassaan ratkaisussa"->"Liettuan syyttäjäviranomainen oli puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål) fann den 27 februari 2017 att Litauens riksåklagare är en ”rättslig myndighet” i den mening som avses i artikel 6.1 i rambeslut 2002/584, och förordnade att PF skulle överlämnas.
PF överklagade domen från High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål) till Court of Appeal (Appellationsdomstolen, Irland) som avslog överklagandet den 20 oktober 2017. Court of Appeal slog fast att Litauens riksåklagare är en ”rättslig myndighet” i den mening som avses i denna bestämmelse.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of överklagandet (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of överklagandet (Irland)"->"PF"[label="avslog överklagandet den 20 oktober 2017."];
  "PF"->"Court of överklagandet (Irland)"[label="överklagandet"];
  "High Court"->"den 27 februari 2017";
  "den 27 februari 2017"->"PF";
  "den 27 februari 2017"->"Litauens riksåklagare är en ”rättslig myndighet” i den mening som avses i artikel 6.1 i rambeslut 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: English

In a judgment of 20 October 2017, the Court of Appeal (Ireland) dismissed PF’s appeal against the judgment of the High Court and held that the Prosecutor General of Lithuania is a ‘judicial authority’ within the meaning of that provision.
The referring court, the Supreme Court (Ireland), granted leave to appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Court of Appeal (Ireland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
   "The Court of Appeal (Ireland)"->"PF"[label="Dismiss 20/10/2017"];
   "PF"->"The Court of Appeal (Ireland)"[label="Appeal"];
   "The High Court"->"PF"[label="Granted to appealagainst the judgement of the Court of Appeal 27/02/2017"];
   "PF"->"The High Court"[label="Appeal"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

С решение от 20 октомври 2017 г. Court of Appeal (Апелативен съд, Ирландия) отхвърля жалбата на PF срещу решението на High Court (Висш съд) и потвърждава, че главният прокурор на Литва е съдебен орган по смисъла на тази разпоредба.
Запитващата юрисдикция, Supreme Court (Върховен съд, Ирландия), допуска подаването на жалба срещу решението на Court of Appeal (Апелативен съд).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Апелативен съд (Ирландия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Апелативен съд (Ирландия)"->"PF"[label="решение от 20 октомври 2017 г. Court of Апелативен съд (Апелативен съд, Ирландия) отхвърля"];
  "PF"->"Court of Апелативен съд (Ирландия)"[label="Апелативен съд"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="допуска подаването на жалба срещу решението на Court of Апелативен съд (Апелативен съд) 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Апелативен съд"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

Mediante sentencia de 20 de octubre de 2017, la Court of Appeal (Tribunal de Apelación, Irlanda) desestimó el recurso interpuesto por PF contra la sentencia de la High Court (Tribunal Superior) y confirmó que el Fiscal General de Lituania era una «autoridad judicial», en el sentido de esa disposición.
El órgano jurisdiccional remitente, la Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo, Irlanda) autorizó la interposición de recurso contra la sentencia de la Court of Appeal (Tribunal de Apelación).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Irlanda)"->"PF"[label="sentencia de 20 de octubre de 2017, desestimó"];
  "PF"->"Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Irlanda)"[label="Tribunal de Apelación"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="autorizó la interposición de recurso contra la sentencia de la Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Tribunal de Apelación) 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Tribunal de Apelación"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Rozsudkem ze dne 20. října 2017 Court of Appeal (Odvolací soud, Irsko) zamítl odvolání PF proti rozsudku High Court (Vrchní soud) a potvrdil, že nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy je „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu uvedeného ustanovení.
Předkládající soud, Supreme Court (Nejvyšší soud, Irsko), povolil podání opravného prostředku proti rozsudku Court of Appeal (Odvolací soud).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Odvolací soud (Irsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Odvolací soud (Irsko)"->"PF"[label="Rozsudkem ze dne 20. října 2017 Court of Odvolací soud (Odvolací soud, Irsko) zamítl odvolání PF"];
  "PF"->"Court of Odvolací soud (Irsko)"[label="Odvolací soud"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="povolil podání opravného prostředku proti rozsudku Court of Odvolací soud (Odvolací soud) 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Odvolací soud"];
    
}