mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

High Court hylkäsi 20.3.2017 OG:n väitteen siitä, ettei Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomainen ole puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen. Court of Appeal (ylioikeus, Irlanti) sai käsiteltäväkseen valituksen tästä High Courtin ratkaisusta, jonka se vahvisti.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of valituksen (Irlanti)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of valituksen (Irlanti)"[label="valituksen"];
  "Court of valituksen (Irlanti)"->"High Court"[label="vahvisti High Court High Courtin ratkaisusta"];
  "High Court"->"hylkäsi 20/03/2017";
  "hylkäsi 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "hylkäsi 20/03/2017"->"Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomainen on puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen."[dir=none];
  "Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomainen on puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen."->"puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål) avslog den 20 mars 2017 OG:s argument om att åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck inte är en ”rättslig myndighet” i den mening som avses i artikel 6.1 i rambeslut 2002/584. Domen från High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål) överklagades till Court of Appeal (Appellationsdomstolen, Irland). Court of Appeal fastställde domen från High Court.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appellationsdomstolen, Irland (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Appellationsdomstolen, Irland (Irland)"[label="Appellationsdomstolen, Irland"];
  "Court of Appellationsdomstolen, Irland (Irland)"->"High Court"[label="fastställde domen från High Court. High Court Domen"];
  "High Court"->"avslog 20/03/2017";
  "avslog 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "avslog 20/03/2017"->"åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck är en ”rättslig myndighet”"[dir=none];
  "åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck är en ”rättslig myndighet”"->"artikel 6.1 i rambeslut 2002/584 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

On 20 March 2017 the High Court rejected OG’s submission that the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Lübeck is not a ‘judicial authority’ within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584. In an appeal brought before the Court of Appeal (Ireland), the judgment of the High Court was upheld.
The referring court, the Supreme Court (Ireland), granted leave to appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Court of Appeal (Ireland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Supreme Court (Ireland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "OG"->"Court of Appeal (Ireland)"[label="Appeal"];
   "Court of Appeal (Ireland)"->"The High Court"[label="Uphold the High Court decision"];
   "The High Court"->"Rejected 20/03/2017";
   "Rejected 20/03/2017"->"OG";
   "Rejected 20/03/2017"->"The Public Prosecutor’s Office in Lübeck is a ‘judicial authority’"[dir=none];
   "The Public Prosecutor’s Office in Lübeck is a ‘judicial authority’"->"Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584"[dir=none];
   "OG"->"Supreme Court (Ireland)"[label="Appeal"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 20 март 2017 г. High Court (Висш съд) отхвърля доводите на OG, изведени от факта, че прокуратурата на Любек не е съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584. Пред Court of Appeal (Апелативен съд, Ирландия) е подадена жалба срещу решението на High Court (Висш съд), която той потвърждава.
Запитващата юрисдикция, Supreme Court (Върховен съд, Ирландия), допуска подаването на жалба срещу решението на Court of Appeal (Апелативен съд).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Апелативен съд (Ирландия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Ирландия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Апелативен съд (Ирландия)"[label="Апелативен съд"];
  "Court of Апелативен съд (Ирландия)"->"High Court"[label="потвърждава High Court решението"];
  "High Court"->"отхвърля 20/03/2017";
  "отхвърля 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "отхвърля 20/03/2017"->"прокуратурата на Любек не е съдебен орган"[dir=none];
  "прокуратурата на Любек не е съдебен орган"->"член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Ирландия)"[label="Апелативен съд"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 20 de marzo de 2017, la High Court (Tribunal Superior) desestimó la alegación de OG de que la Fiscalía de Lübeck no era una «autoridad judicial» en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584. Esta sentencia de la High Court (Tribunal Superior) fue recurrida ante la Court of Appeal (Tribunal de Apelación, Irlanda), que la confirmó.
El órgano jurisdiccional remitente, la Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo, Irlanda), autorizó la interposición de recurso contra la sentencia de la Court of Appeal (Tribunal de Apelación).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Irlanda)"[label="Tribunal de Apelación"];
  "Court of Tribunal de Apelación (Irlanda)"->"High Court"[label="la confirmó High Court Decisión Marco 2002/584"];
  "High Court"->"desestimó 20/03/2017";
  "desestimó 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "desestimó 20/03/2017"->"la Fiscalía de Lübeck es una «autoridad judicial»"[dir=none];
  "la Fiscalía de Lübeck es una «autoridad judicial»"->"artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irlanda)"[label="Tribunal de Apelación"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dne 20. března 2017 High Court (Vrchní soud) odmítl argument OG, že státní zastupitelství v Lübecku není „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584. Proti tomuto rozsudku High Court (Vrchní soud) bylo podáno odvolání ke Court of Appeal (Odvolací soud, Irsko), který uvedený rozsudek potvrdil.
Předkládající soud, Supreme Court (Nejvyšší soud, Irsko), povolil podání opravného prostředku proti rozsudku Court of Appeal (Odvolací soud).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Odvolací soud (Irsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Odvolací soud (Irsko)"[label="Odvolací soud"];
  "Court of Odvolací soud (Irsko)"->"High Court"[label="rozsudek potvrdil High Court rozsudek"];
  "High Court"->"odmítl 20/03/2017";
  "odmítl 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "odmítl 20/03/2017"->"státní zastupitelství v Lübecku je"justiční orgánem"[dir=none];
  "státní zastupitelství v Lübecku je"justiční orgánem"->"čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irsko)"[label="Odvolací soud"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den 20. marts 2017 forkastede High Court (ret i første instans) OG’s anbringende om, at anklagemyndigheden i Lübeck ikke er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584. Court of Appeal (appeldomstol, Irland) behandlede appellen af denne dom afsagt af High Court (ret i første instans), som den stadfæstede.
Den forelæggende ret, Supreme Court (øverste domstol, Irland), gav tilladelse til iværksættelse af appel til prøvelse af dommen afsagt af Court of Appeal (appeldomstolen).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of appel (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of appel (Irland)"[label="appel"];
  "Court of appel (Irland)"->"High Court"[label="som den stadfæstede. High Court dommen"];
  "High Court"->"forkastede 20/03/2017";
  "forkastede 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "forkastede 20/03/2017"->"Anklagemyndigheden i Lübeck er en »judiciel myndighed«"[dir=none];
  "Anklagemyndigheden i Lübeck er en »judiciel myndighed«"->"artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irland)"[label="appel"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

Am 20. März 2017 wies der High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) das Vorbringen von OG zurück, dass die Staatsanwaltschaft Lübeck keine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 sei. Der Court of Appeal (Berufungsgerichtshof, Irland), bei dem ein Rechtsmittel gegen das Urteil des High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) eingelegt wurde, bestätigte dessen Urteil.
Das vorlegende Gericht – der Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof, Irland) – ließ die Einlegung eines Rechtsmittels gegen das Urteil des Court of Appeal (Berufungsgerichtshof) zu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Irland)"[label="Berufungsgerichtshof"];
  "Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Irland)"->"High Court"[label="bestätigte dessen Urteil. High Court Urteil"];
  "High Court"->"wies zurück 20/03/2017";
  "wies zurück 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "wies zurück 20/03/2017"->"die Staatsanwaltschaft Lübeck keine „Justizbehörde“"[dir=none];
  "die Staatsanwaltschaft Lübeck keine „Justizbehörde“"->"Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irland)"[label="Berufungsgerichtshof"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

High Court (kõrge kohus) lükkas 20. märtsil 2017 tagasi OG argmendi, mille kohaselt ei ole Lübecki prokuratuur raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses „õigusasutus“. Court of Appealile (apellatsioonikohus, Iirimaa) esitati High Courti (kõrge kohus) otsuse peale apellatsioonkaebus, mille ta jättis rahuldamata.
Eelotsusetaotluse esitanud Supreme Court (Iirimaa kõrgeim kohus) andis loa esitada Court of Appeali (apellatsioonikohus) otsuse peale kassatsioonkaebus.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of apellatsioon (Iirimaa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Iirimaa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of apellatsioon (Iirimaa)"[label="apellatsioon"];
  "Court of apellatsioon (Iirimaa)"->"High Court"[label="jättis rahuldamata. High Court otsuse"];
  "High Court"->"jättis rahuldamata 20/03/2017";
  "jättis rahuldamata 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "jättis rahuldamata 20/03/2017"->"Lübecki prokuratuur raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses „õigusasutus“"[dir=none];
  "Lübecki prokuratuur raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses „õigusasutus“"->"raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Iirimaa)"[label="apellatsioon"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 20 Μαρτίου 2017, το High Court (ανώτερο δικαστήριο) απέρριψε το επιχείρημα του OG ότι η εισαγγελία του Lübeck δεν είναι «δικαστική αρχή» κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584. Το Court of Appeal (εφετείο, Ιρλανδία) επιλήφθηκε εφέσεως η οποία ασκήθηκε κατά της ως άνω αποφάσεως του High Court (ανώτερου δικαστηρίου) την οποία επικύρωσε.
Το αιτούν δικαστήριο, Supreme Court (Ανώτατο Δικαστήριο, Ιρλανδία), επέτρεψε την άσκηση αναιρέσεως κατά της αποφάσεως του Court of Appeal (εφετείου).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of εφετείο (Ιρλανδία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Ιρλανδία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of εφετείο (Ιρλανδία)"[label="εφετείο"];
  "Court of εφετείο (Ιρλανδία)"->"High Court"[label="επικύρωσε High Court αποφάσεως"];
  "High Court"->"απέρριψε 20/03/2017";
  "απέρριψε 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "απέρριψε 20/03/2017"->"η εισαγγελία του Lübeck είναι «δικαστική αρχή»"[dir=none];
  "η εισαγγελία του Lübeck είναι «δικαστική αρχή»"->"άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Ιρλανδία)"[label="εφετείο"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

Le 20 mars 2017, la High Court (Haute Cour) a rejeté l’argument d’OG tiré du fait que le parquet de Lübeck n’est pas une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584. La Court of Appeal (Cour d’appel, Irlande) a été saisie d’un recours contre cet arrêt de la High Court (Haute Cour), qu’elle a confirmé.
La juridiction de renvoi, la Supreme Court (Cour suprême, Irlande), a autorisé l’introduction d’un recours contre l’arrêt de la Court of Appeal (Cour d’appel).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Cour d’appel (Irlande)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irlande)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Cour d’appel (Irlande)"[label="Cour d’appel"];
  "Court of Cour d’appel (Irlande)"->"High Court"[label="a confirmé High Court décision-cadre 2002/584"];
  "High Court"->"a rejeté 20/03/2017";
  "a rejeté 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "a rejeté 20/03/2017"->"le parquet de Lübeck est une « autorité judiciaire »"[dir=none];
  "le parquet de Lübeck est une « autorité judiciaire »"->"l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irlande)"[label="Cour d’appel"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

High Court (Visoki sud) je 20. ožujka 2017. odbacio argument osobe OG o tome da Državno odvjetništvo u Lübecku nije „pravosudno tijelo” u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. Okvirne odluke 2002/584. Protiv te presude High Courta (Visoki sud) podnesena je žalba Court of Appealu (Žalbeni sud, Irska), koji je potvrdio predmetnu presudu.
Supreme Court (Vrhovni sud), odnosno sud koji je uputio zahtjev, odobrio je podnošenje revizije protiv presude Court of Appeala (Žalbeni sud).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Žalba (Irska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Žalba (Irska)"[label="Žalba"];
  "Court of Žalba (Irska)"->"High Court"[label="potvrdio predmetnu presudu. High Court presudu"];
  "High Court"->"odbacio 20/03/2017";
  "odbacio 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "odbacio 20/03/2017"->"Državno odvjetništvo u Lübecku je „pravosudno tijelo”"[dir=none];
  "Državno odvjetništvo u Lübecku je „pravosudno tijelo”"->"članka 6. stavka 1. Okvirne odluke 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irska)"[label="Žalba"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 20 marzo 2017 la High Court (Alta Corte) ha respinto l’argomento di OG vertente sul fatto che la procura di Lubecca non è un’«autorità giudiziaria», ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584. La Court of Appeal (Corte d’appello, Irlanda), adita con ricorso avverso la sentenza della High Court (Alta Corte), ha confermato detta sentenza.
La Supreme Court (Corte Suprema, Irlanda), giudice del rinvio, ha autorizzato la presentazione di un ricorso avverso la sentenza della Court of Appeal (Corte d’appello).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Corte d’appello (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Corte d’appello (Irlanda)"[label="Corte d’appello"];
  "Court of Corte d’appello (Irlanda)"->"High Court"[label="ha confermato detta sentenza. High Court decisione"];
  "High Court"->"ha respinto 20/03/2017";
  "ha respinto 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "ha respinto 20/03/2017"->"la procura di Lubecca è un’«autorità giudiziaria»"[dir=none];
  "la procura di Lubecca è un’«autorità giudiziaria»"->"articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irlanda)"[label="Corte d’appello"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

2017. gada 20. martāHigh Court (Augstā tiesa) noraidīja OG argumentu par to, ka Lībekas prokuratūra nav “tiesu iestāde” Pamatlēmuma 2002/584 6. panta 1. punkta izpratnē. Par šo High Court (Augstā tiesa) spriedumu tika iesniegta apelācijas sūdzība Court of Appeal (Apelācijas tiesa, Īrija), kura apstiprināja minēto spriedumu.
Iesniedzējtiesa, Supreme Court (Augstākā tiesa, Īrija), atļāva pārsūdzēt Court of Appeal (Apelācijas tiesa) spriedumu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Apelācijas tiesa (Īrija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Īrija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Apelācijas tiesa (Īrija)"[label="Apelācijas tiesa"];
  "Court of Apelācijas tiesa (Īrija)"->"High Court"[label="apstiprināja minēto spriedumu. High Court spriedumu"];
  "High Court"->"noraidīja 20/03/2017";
  "noraidīja 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "noraidīja 20/03/2017"->"Lībekas prokuratūra ir “tiesu iestāde”"[dir=none];
  "Lībekas prokuratūra ir “tiesu iestāde”"->"Pamatlēmuma 2002/584 6. panta 1. punkta 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Īrija)"[label="Apelācijas tiesa"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2017 m. kovo 20 d.High Court (Aukštasis teismas) atmetė OG argumentą, kad Liubeko prokuratūra nėra „teisminė institucija“, kaip tai suprantama pagal Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 6 straipsnio 1 dalį. Court of Appeal (Apeliacinis teismas, Airija), kuriam dėl šio High Court (Aukštasis teismas) sprendimo pateiktas apeliacinis skundas, patvirtino teismo sprendimą.
Supreme Court (Aukščiausiasis Teismas, Airija), prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas, leido pateikti kasacinį skundą dėl Court of Appeal (Apeliacinis teismas) sprendimo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Apeliacinis (Airija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Airija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Apeliacinis (Airija)"[label="Apeliacinis"];
  "Court of Apeliacinis (Airija)"->"High Court"[label="patvirtino teismo sprendimą. High Court sprendimo"];
  "High Court"->"atmetė 20/03/2017";
  "atmetė 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "atmetė 20/03/2017"->"Liubeko prokuratūra yra „teisminė institucija“"[dir=none];
  "Liubeko prokuratūra yra „teisminė institucija“"->"Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 6 straipsnio 1 dalį. 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Airija)"[label="Apeliacinis"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2017. március 20‑án a High Court (felsőbíróság) elutasította OG arra vonatkozó érvét, hogy a lübecki ügyészség nem a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése értelmében vett „igazságügyi hatóság”. OG fellebbezést terjesztett a Court of Appeal (fellebbviteli bíróság, Írország) elé a High Court (felsőbíróság) ezen ítélete ellen, amelyet a Court of Appeal helybenhagyott.
A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság, a Supreme Court (legfelsőbb bíróság, Írország) engedélyezte jogorvoslat előterjesztését a Court of Appeal (fellebbviteli bíróság) ítélete ellen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of fellebbviteli bíróság (Írország)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Írország)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of fellebbviteli bíróság (Írország)"[label="fellebbviteli bíróság"];
  "Court of fellebbviteli bíróság (Írország)"->"High Court"[label="helybenhagyott High Court ítélete"];
  "High Court"->"elutasította 20/03/2017";
  "elutasította 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "elutasította 20/03/2017"->"a lübecki ügyészség nem a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése értelmében vett „igazságügyi hatóság”"[dir=none];
  "a lübecki ügyészség nem a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése értelmében vett „igazságügyi hatóság”"->"2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Írország)"[label="fellebbviteli bíróság"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fl-20 ta’ Marzu 2017, il-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) ċaħdet l-argument ta’ OG ibbażat fuq il-fatt li l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Lübeck ma huwiex “awtorità ġudizzjarja” fis-sens tal-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584. Il-Court of Appeal (il-Qorti tal-Appell, l-Irlanda) ġiet adita b’appell minn din is-sentenza tal-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja), li hija kkonfermat.
Il-qorti tar-rinviju, is-Supreme Court (il-Qorti Suprema, l-Irlanda), awtorizzat il-preżentata ta’ azzjoni kontra s-sentenza tal-Court of Appeal (il-Qorti tal-Appell).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Appell (l-Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (l-Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Appell (l-Irlanda)"[label="Appell"];
  "Court of Appell (l-Irlanda)"->"High Court"[label="kkonfermat High Court Deċiżjoni"];
  "High Court"->"ċaħdet 20/03/2017";
  "ċaħdet 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "ċaħdet 20/03/2017"->"l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Lübeck ma huwiex “awtorità ġudizzjarja”"[dir=none];
  "l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Lübeck ma huwiex “awtorità ġudizzjarja”"->"Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (l-Irlanda)"[label="Appell"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

De High Court verwierp op 20 maart 2017 het argument van OG dat het openbaar ministerie van Lübeck niet als „rechterlijke autoriteit” kan worden aangemerkt in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584. De Court of Appeal (rechter in tweede aanleg, Ierland), waarbij hoger beroep aanhangig is gemaakt, heeft het vonnis van de High Court bevestigd.
De verwijzende rechter, de Supreme Court (hoogste rechterlijke instantie, Ierland), heeft toestemming gegeven om hoger beroep in te stellen tegen het arrest van de Court of Appeal.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of beroep (Ierland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Ierland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of beroep (Ierland)"[label="beroep"];
  "Court of beroep (Ierland)"->"High Court"[label="heeft het vonnis van de High Court bevestigd. High Court het vonnis"];
  "High Court"->"verwierp 20/03/2017";
  "verwierp 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "verwierp 20/03/2017"->"het openbaar ministerie van Lübeck niet als „rechterlijke autoriteit” kan worden aangemerkt"[dir=none];
  "het openbaar ministerie van Lübeck niet als „rechterlijke autoriteit” kan worden aangemerkt"->"artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Ierland)"[label="beroep"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 20 marca 2017 r. High Court (wysoki trybunał) oddalił argument OG dotyczący okoliczności, że prokuratura w Lubece nie jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584. Od tego wyroku High Court (wysokiego trybunału, Irlandia) zostało złożone odwołanie do Court of Appeal (sądu apelacyjnego, Irlandia), który utrzymał wspomniany wyrok w mocy.
Sąd odsyłający, Supreme Court (sąd najwyższy, Irlandia), zezwolił na wniesienie odwołania od wyroku Court of Appeal (sądu apelacyjnego).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of odwołanie (Irlandia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irlandia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of odwołanie (Irlandia)"[label="odwołanie"];
  "Court of odwołanie (Irlandia)"->"High Court"[label="utrzymał wspomniany wyrok w mocy High Court wyrok"];
  "High Court"->"oddalił 20/03/2017";
  "oddalił 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "oddalił 20/03/2017"->"prokuratura w Lubece jest „organem sądowym”"[dir=none];
  "prokuratura w Lubece jest „organem sądowym”"->"art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irlandia)"[label="odwołanie"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 20 de março de 2017, a High Court (Tribunal Superior) rejeitou o argumento de OG relativo ao facto de a Procuradoria de Lübeck não ser uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584. Foi interposto recurso dessa decisão da High Court (Tribunal Superior) na Court of Appeal (Tribunal de Recurso, Irlanda), que esta confirmou.
O órgão jurisdicional de reenvio, a Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal, Irlanda), autorizou a interposição de um recurso do acórdão da Court of Appeal (Tribunal de Recurso).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of recurso (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of recurso (Irlanda)"[label="recurso"];
  "Court of recurso (Irlanda)"->"High Court"[label="confirmou High Court decisão"];
  "High Court"->"rejeitou 20/03/2017";
  "rejeitou 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "rejeitou 20/03/2017"->"a Procuradoria de Lübeck não ser uma «autoridade judiciária»"[dir=none];
  "a Procuradoria de Lübeck não ser uma «autoridade judiciária»"->"artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irlanda)"[label="recurso"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 20 martie 2017, High Court (Înalta Curte) a respins argumentul lui OG care se întemeia pe faptul că Parchetul din Lübeck nu este o „autoritate judiciară” în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584. Court of Appeal (Curtea de Apel, Irlanda) a fost sesizată cu o cale de atac împotriva acestei hotărâri a High Court (Înalta Curte), pe care a confirmat‑o.
Instanța de trimitere, Supreme Court (Curtea Supremă, Irlanda), a autorizat introducerea unei căi de atac împotriva hotărârii Court of Appeal (Curtea de Apel).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Apel (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Apel (Irlanda)"[label="Apel"];
  "Court of Apel (Irlanda)"->"High Court"[label="a confirmat-o High Court hotărârii"];
  "High Court"->"a respins 20/03/2017";
  "a respins 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "a respins 20/03/2017"->"Parchetul din Lübeck nu este o „autoritate judiciară”"[dir=none];
  "Parchetul din Lübeck nu este o „autoritate judiciară”"->"articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irlanda)"[label="Apel"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 20. marca 2017 High Court (Vyšší súd) odmietol tvrdenie OG, že prokuratúra v Lübecku nie je „súdnym orgánom“ v zmysle článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584. Court of Appeal (Odvolací súd, Írsko) rozhodoval o odvolaní, ktoré bolo podané proti tomuto rozsudku High Court (Vyšší súd), pričom rozsudok potvrdil.
Supreme Court (Najvyšší súd, Írsko), ktorý položil prejudiciálne otázky, povolil podanie opravného prostriedku proti rozsudku Court of Appeal (Odvolací súd).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Odvolací súd (Írsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Írsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Odvolací súd (Írsko)"[label="Odvolací súd"];
  "Court of Odvolací súd (Írsko)"->"High Court"[label="rozsudok potvrdil High Court rozsudok"];
  "High Court"->"odmietol 20/03/2017";
  "odmietol 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "odmietol 20/03/2017"->"prokuratúra v Lübecku je „súdnym orgánom“"[dir=none];
  "prokuratúra v Lübecku je „súdnym orgánom“"->"článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Írsko)"[label="Odvolací súd"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

High Court (višje sodišče) je 20. marca 2017 zavrnilo trditev OG, da državno tožilstvo v Lübecku ni „pravosodni organ“ v smislu člena 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584. Court of Appeal (pritožbeno sodišče, Irska) je 20. marca 2017 prejelo pritožbo zoper to sodbo High Court (višje sodišče), ki jo je potrdilo.
Predložitveno sodišče, Supreme Court (vrhovno sodišče, Irska), je dopustilo pritožbo zoper sodbo Court of Appeal (pritožbeno sodišče).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of pritožbo (Irska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of pritožbo (Irska)"[label="pritožbo"];
  "Court of pritožbo (Irska)"->"High Court"[label="ki jo je potrdilo High Court sodbo"];
  "High Court"->"zavrnilo 20/03/2017";
  "zavrnilo 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "zavrnilo 20/03/2017"->"državno tožilstvo v Lübecku je"pravosodni organ"[dir=none];
  "državno tožilstvo v Lübecku je"pravosodni organ"->"člena 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irska)"[label="pritožbo"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

High Court hylkäsi 20.3.2017 OG:n väitteen siitä, ettei Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomainen ole puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen. Court of Appeal (ylioikeus, Irlanti) sai käsiteltäväkseen valituksen tästä High Courtin ratkaisusta, jonka se vahvisti.
Ennakkoratkaisua pyytänyt tuomioistuin Supreme Court (ylin tuomioistuin, Irlanti) myönsi luvan valittaa Court of Appealin ratkaisusta.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of Valittaa (Irlanti)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irlanti)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of Valittaa (Irlanti)"[label="Valittaa"];
  "Court of Valittaa (Irlanti)"->"High Court"[label="vahvisti High Court ratkaisusta"];
  "High Court"->"hylkäsi 20/03/2017";
  "hylkäsi 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "hylkäsi 20/03/2017"->"Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomainen on puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen."[dir=none];
  "Lyypekin syyttäjäviranomainen on puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen."->"puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irlanti)"[label="Valittaa"]
}