mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål) avslog den 20 mars 2017 OG:s argument om att åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck inte är en ”rättslig myndighet” i den mening som avses i artikel 6.1 i rambeslut 2002/584. Domen från High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål) överklagades till Court of Appeal (Appellationsdomstolen, Irland). Court of Appeal fastställde domen från High Court.
Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen, Irland), som är den domstol som begärt förhandsavgörande från EU-domstolen, meddelade prövningstillstånd och förordnade att domen från Court of Appeal (Appellationsdomstolen) fick överklagas.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "OG"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Court of överklagades (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Supreme Court (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "OG"->"Court of överklagades (Irland)"[label="överklagades"];
  "Court of överklagades (Irland)"->"High Court"[label="fastställde domen från High Court. High Court domen"];
  "High Court"->"avslog 20/03/2017";
  "avslog 20/03/2017"->"OG";
  "avslog 20/03/2017"->"åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck inte är en ”rättslig myndighet”"[dir=none];
  "åklagarmyndigheten i Lübeck inte är en ”rättslig myndighet”"->"artikel 6.1 i rambeslut 2002/584 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "OG"->"Supreme Court (Irland)"[label="överklagades"]
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

On 15 March 2018, PI, a Romanian national, was the subject of a European arrest warrant issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Zwickau (Germany) for the prosecution of a criminal offence identified as ‘organised or armed robbery’. That arrest warrant was endorsed for execution by the referring court, the High Court, on 12 September 2018. PI was arrested on 15 October 2018 pursuant to that arrest warrant and has remained in custody since that date.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Public Prosecutor’s Office in Zwickau (Germany)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "European arrest warrant"[shape=trapezium];
    
   "The Public Prosecutor’s Office in Zwickau (Germany)"->"European arrest warrant"[label="Issue 15/03/2018"];
   "European arrest warrant"->"The High Court"[label="Endorsed 12/09/2018"];
   "The High Court"->"PI"[label="Arrest 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 15 март 2018 г. срещу румънския гражданин PI е издадена европейска заповед за арест от прокуратурата на Цвикау (Германия) за предаването му за целите на наказателно преследване за деяния, квалифицирани като „организиран или въоръжен грабеж“. На 12 септември 2018 г. запитващата юрисдикция High Court (Висш съд) потвърждава тази заповед. PI е арестуван на 15 октомври 2018 г. въз основа на посочената заповед за арест и от тази дата е задържан.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "прокуратурата на Цвикау (Германия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "европейска заповед за арест"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "прокуратурата на Цвикау (Германия)"->"европейска заповед за арест"[label="На 15 март 2018 г."];
  "европейска заповед за арест"->"High Court"[label="потвърждава 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="арестуван 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 15 de marzo de 2018 la Fiscalía de Zwickau (Alemania) emitió una orden de detención europea contra PI, de nacionalidad rumana, al objeto de que se procediera a su entrega para enjuiciarlo por hechos calificados de «robo organizado o a mano armada». Esa orden fue ratificada a efectos de su ejecución por el órgano jurisdiccional remitente, la High Court (Tribunal Superior), el 12 de septiembre de 2018. PI fue detenido el 15 de octubre de 2018 en cumplimiento de dicha orden y se encuentra privado de libertad desde entonces.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la Fiscalía de Zwickau (Alemania)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "orden de detención europea"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "la Fiscalía de Zwickau (Alemania)"->"orden de detención europea"[label="El 15 de marzo de 2018"];
  "orden de detención europea"->"High Court"[label="ratificada 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="detención 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dne 15. března 2018 vydalo státní zastupitelství ve Cvikově (Německo) evropský zatýkací rozkaz na PI, rumunského státního příslušníka, za účelem jeho předání k trestnímu stíhání pro čin kvalifikovaný jako „organizovaná nebo ozbrojená loupež“. Předkládající soud, High Court (Vrchní soud), schválil dne 12. září 2018 vykonatelnost tohoto zatýkacího rozkazu. PI byl na základě uvedeného zatýkacího rozkazu zatčen dne 15. října 2018 a od tohoto data je ve vazbě.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "státní zastupitelství ve Cvikově (Německo)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "evropský zatýkací rozkaz"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "státní zastupitelství ve Cvikově (Německo)"->"evropský zatýkací rozkaz"[label="Dne 15. března 2018"];
  "evropský zatýkací rozkaz"->"High Court"[label="schválil 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="zatčen 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den 15. marts 2018 udstedte anklagemyndigheden i Zwickau (Tyskland) en europæisk arrestordre mod den rumænske statsborger PI med henblik på dennes overgivelse til strafferetlig forfølgning for gerninger kvalificeret som »organiseret eller væbnet røveri«. Den 12. september 2018 blev arrestordren påtegnet af High Court (ret i første instans) med henblik på fuldbyrdelse. PI blev anholdt på grundlag af arrestordren den 15. oktober 2018 og har siden været varetægtsfængslet.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "anklagemyndigheden i Zwickau (Tyskland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europæisk arrestordre"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "anklagemyndigheden i Zwickau (Tyskland)"->"europæisk arrestordre"[label="Den 15. marts 2018"];
  "europæisk arrestordre"->"High Court"[label="påtegnet 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="arrestordren 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

Am 15. März 2018 erließ die Staatsanwaltschaft Zwickau (Deutschland) einen Europäischen Haftbefehl gegen PI, einen rumänischen Staatsangehörigen, um seine Übergabe zur Strafverfolgung wegen Straftaten zu erwirken, die als „Bandenraub oder Raub mit Waffen“ qualifiziert wurden. Der Haftbefehl wurde vom vorlegenden Gericht – dem High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) – am 12. September 2018 für vollstreckbar erklärt. PI wurde am 15. Oktober 2018 auf der Grundlage dieses Haftbefehls festgenommen und befindet sich seitdem in Haft.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "die Staatsanwaltschaft Zwickau (Deutschland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europäischen Haftbefehl"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "die Staatsanwaltschaft Zwickau (Deutschland)"->"Europäischen Haftbefehl"[label="Am 15. März 2018"];
  "Europäischen Haftbefehl"->"High Court"[label="für vollstreckbar erklärt 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="festgenommen 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Zwickau prokuratuur (Saksamaa) tegi Rumeenia kodaniku PI suhtes 15. märtsil 2018 Euroopa vahistamismääruse, et ta antaks üle kriminaalmenetluse raames kohtu alla andmiseks seoses kuriteoga, mis kvalifitseeriti „organiseeritud või relvastatud röövimiseks“. Eelotsusetaotluse esitanud kohus High Court (kõrge kohus) andis 12. septembril 2018 loa vahistamismääruse täitmiseks. PI peeti selle vahistamismääruse alusel 15. oktoobril 2018 kinni ning on alates sellest ajast vahi all.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Zwickau prokuratuur (Saksamaa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Zwickau prokuratuur (Saksamaa)"->"Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[label="15. märtsil 2018"];
  "Euroopa vahistamismääruse"->"High Court"[label="täitmiseks 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="vahistamismääruse 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 15 Μαρτίου 2018, η εισαγγελία του Zwickau (Γερμανία) εξέδωσε σε βάρος του PI, Ρουμάνου υπηκόου, ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως, με σκοπό την παράδοσή του στο πλαίσιο ποινικής διώξεως για τα αδικήματα της «οργανωμένης ή ένοπλης ληστείας». Το αιτούν δικαστήριο, High Court (ανώτερο δικαστήριο), αποφάσισε στις 12 Σεπτεμβρίου 2018 να εκτελέσει το ένταλμα αυτό. Ο PI συνελήφθη στις 15 Οκτωβρίου 2018 βάσει του εν λόγω εντάλματος και τελεί έκτοτε υπό κράτηση.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "η εισαγγελία του Zwickau (Γερμανία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "η εισαγγελία του Zwickau (Γερμανία)"->"ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως"[label="Στις 15 Μαρτίου 2018"];
  "ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως"->"High Court"[label="Εγκρίθηκε 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="συλλήψεως 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

Le 15 mars 2018, PI, un ressortissant roumain, a fait l’objet d’un mandat d’arrêt européen émis par le parquet de Zwickau (Allemagne) en vue de sa remise aux fins de poursuites pénales pour des faits qualifiés de « vol organisé ou vol à main armée ». Ce mandat a été contresigné par la juridiction de renvoi, la High Court (Haute Cour), le 12 septembre 2018 pour exécution. PI a été arrêté le 15 octobre 2018 sur le fondement dudit mandat et se trouve en détention depuis cette date.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "le parquet de Zwickau (Allemagne)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "le parquet de Zwickau (Allemagne)"->"mandat d’arrêt européen"[label="Le 15 mars 2018"];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"->"High Court"[label="contresigné 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="arrêté 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Državno odvjetništvo u Zwickauu (Njemačka) izdalo je 15. ožujka 2018. europski uhidbeni nalog protiv osobe PI, rumunjskog državljanina, radi njegove predaje u svrhu kaznenog progona zbog kaznenog djela „organizirane krađe ili oružane krađe”. Izvršenje tog naloga odredio je 12. rujna 2018. High Court (Visoki sud), odnosno sud koji je uputio zahtjev. PI je 15. listopada 2018. uhićen na temelju tog naloga te mu je od tog datuma oduzeta sloboda.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Državno odvjetništvo u Zwickauu (Njemačka)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europski uhidbeni nalog"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Državno odvjetništvo u Zwickauu (Njemačka)"->"europski uhidbeni nalog"[label="15. ožujka 2018."];
  "europski uhidbeni nalog"->"High Court"[label="Izvršenje 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="uhićen 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 15 marzo 2018 PI, cittadino rumeno, è stato oggetto di un mandato d’arresto europeo emesso dalla procura di Zwickau (Germania) ai fini della sua consegna per l’esercizio di un’azione penale per fatti qualificati come «furto organizzato o rapina a mano armata». Tale mandato è stato controfirmato dal giudice del rinvio, la High Court (Alta Corte), il 12 settembre 2018, per l’esecuzione. PI è stato arrestato il 15 ottobre 2018 sulla base di detto mandato e si trova in stato di detenzione a partire da tale data.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "la procura di Zwickau (Germania)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "la procura di Zwickau (Germania)"->"mandato d’arresto europeo"[label="Il 15 marzo 2018"];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"->"High Court"[label="controfirmato 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="arrestato 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

2018. gada 15. martā Cvikavas prokuratūra (Vācija) izsniedza Eiropas apcietināšanas orderi attiecībā uz Rumānijas pilsoni PI, lai panāktu viņa nodošanu kriminālvajāšanai par noziedzīgiem nodarījumiem, kas kvalificēti kā “organizēta vai bruņota laupīšana”. 2018. gada 12. septembrīHigh Court (Augstā tiesa) apstiprināja šī ordera izpildi. Pamatojoties uz minēto orderi, PI 2018. gada 15. oktobrī tika apcietināts un no tā laika atrodas apcietinājumā.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cvikavas prokuratūra (Vācija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Cvikavas prokuratūra (Vācija)"->"Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[label="2018. gada 15. martā"];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"->"High Court"[label="apstiprināja 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="apcietināts 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2018 m. kovo 15 d. Cvikau (Vokietija) prokuratūra išdavė Europos arešto orderį dėl Rumunijos piliečio PI, siekdama, kad jis būtų perduotas baudžiamojo persekiojimo tikslais dėl veikų, kvalifikuotinų kaip „plėšimas organizuotoje grupėje arba plėšimas panaudojant šaunamąjį ginklą“. 2018 m. rugsėjo 12 d. prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas High Court (Aukštasis teismas) pritarė šio orderio vykdymui. Remiantis minėtu arešto orderiu, PI buvo laikinai sulaikytas 2018 m. spalio 15 d. ir nuo tos dienos yra suimtas.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Cvikau (Vokietija) prokuratūra"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europos arešto orderis"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Cvikau (Vokietija) prokuratūra"->"Europos arešto orderis"[label="2018 m. kovo 15 d."];
  "Europos arešto orderis"->"High Court"[label="pritariė šio orderio vykdymui 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="Areštas 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2018. március 15‑én a zwickaui (Németország) ügyészség által kibocsátott európai elfogatóparancs alapján kérték a román állampolgárságú PI átadását „szervezett vagy fegyveres rablásnak” minősített cselekmények miatti büntetőeljárás lefolytatása céljából. Ezt az elfogatóparancsot a High Court (felsőbíróság, Írország) 2018. szeptember 12‑én végrehajthatóvá nyilvánította. PI‑t az említett elfogatóparancs alapján 2018. október 15‑én tartóztatták le, és ezen időpont óta fogva tartják.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "a zwickaui (Németország) ügyészség"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európai elfogatóparancs"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "a zwickaui (Németország) ügyészség"->"európai elfogatóparancs"[label="2018. március 15-én"];
  "európai elfogatóparancs"->"High Court"[label="végrehajthatóvá nyilvánította 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="tartóztatták le 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fil-15 ta’ Marzu 2018, PI, ċittadin Rumen, kien is-suġġett ta’ mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew maħruġ mill-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Zwickau (il-Ġermanja) fid-dawl tal-konsenja tiegħu għall-finijiet ta’ proċeduri kriminali għal atti kklassifikati bħala “serq organizzat jew bl-użu ta’ armi”. Dan il-mandat kien kontroffirmat mill-qorti tar-rinviju, il-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja), fit-12 ta’ Settembru 2018 għall-eżekuzzjoni. PI ġie arrestat fil-15 ta’ Ottubru 2018 abbażi tal-imsemmi mandat u ilu f’detenzjoni minn dik id-data.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Zwickau (il-Ġermanja)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "l-Uffiċċju tal-Prosekutur ta’ Zwickau (il-Ġermanja)"->"mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[label="Fil-15 ta’ Marzu 2018"];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"->"High Court"[label="kontroffirmat 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 15 maart 2018 heeft het openbaar ministerie van Zwickau (Duitsland) een Europees aanhoudingsbevel uitgevaardigd tegen PI, een Roemeens staatsburger, met het oog op zijn overlevering voor strafvervolging wegens feiten die werden aangemerkt als „georganiseerde of gewapende diefstal”. Dit bevel werd op 12 september 2018 ter uitvoering bekrachtigd door de verwijzende rechter, de High Court. PI werd op grond van dit bevel op 15 oktober 2018 gearresteerd en bevindt zich sinds die datum in hechtenis.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "het openbaar ministerie van Zwickau (Duitsland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "het openbaar ministerie van Zwickau (Duitsland)"->"Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[label="Op 15 maart 2018"];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"->"High Court"[label="bekrachtigd 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="gearresteerd 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 15 marca 2018 r. wobec PI, obywatela rumuńskiego, został wydany europejski nakaz aresztowania przez prokuraturę w Zwickau (Niemcy) w celu przekazania go do celów przeprowadzenia postępowania karnego w związku z popełnieniem czynów zakwalifikowanych jako „kradzież zorganizowana oraz kradzież z bronią w ręku”. Nakaz ten został podpisany przez sąd odsyłający, High Court (wysoki trybunał) w dniu 12 września 2018 r. w celu wykonania. PI został zatrzymany w dniu 15 października 2018 r. na podstawie wspomnianego nakazu i od tego dnia przebywa w zakładzie karnym.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "prokuraturę w Zwickau (Niemcy)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europejski nakaz aresztowania"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "prokuraturę w Zwickau (Niemcy)"->"europejski nakaz aresztowania"[label="15 marca 2018 r."];
  "europejski nakaz aresztowania"->"High Court"[label="podpisany 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="aresztowania 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 15 de março de 2018, PI, nacional romeno, foi alvo de um mandado de detenção europeu pelo Ministério Público de Zwickau (Alemanha) com vista à sua entrega para efeitos da ação penal por atos qualificados como «roubo organizado ou roubo à mão armada». Esse mandado foi aprovado pelo órgão jurisdicional de reenvio, a High Court (Tribunal Superior), em 12 de setembro de 2018, para execução. PI foi preso em 15 de outubro de 2018 com base no referido mandado e encontra‑se detido desde então.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Ministério Público de Zwickau (Alemanha)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Ministério Público de Zwickau (Alemanha)"->"mandado de detenção europeu"[label="15 de março de 2018"];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"->"High Court"[label="aprovado 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="preso 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 15 martie 2018, PI, resortisant român, a făcut obiectul unui mandat european de arestare emis de Parchetul din Zwickau (Germania) în vederea predării sale în scopul urmăririi penale pentru fapte calificate drept „jaf organizat sau armat”. Acest mandat a fost contrasemnat la 12 septembrie 2018 de instanța de trimitere, High Court (Înalta Curte), pentru executare. PI a fost arestat la 15 octombrie 2018 în temeiul mandatului menționat și se află în detenție de la această dată.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Parchetul din Zwickau (Germania)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat european de arestare"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Parchetul din Zwickau (Germania)"->"mandat european de arestare"[label="15 martie 2018"];
  "mandat european de arestare"->"High Court"[label="contrasemnat 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="arestat 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 15. marca 2018 vydala prokuratúra v Zwickau (Nemecko) európsky zatykač na rumunského štátneho príslušníka PI, ktorým požiadala o jeho vydanie na účely trestného stíhania za skutky kvalifikované ako „organizovaná lúpež alebo ozbrojená lúpež“. Vykonateľnosť tohto zatykača schválil High Court (Vyšší súd) 12. septembra 2018. Dňa 15. októbra 2018 bol PI na základe uvedeného zatykača zadržaný a od tohto dátumu sa nachádza vo väzbe.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "prokuratúra v Zwickau (Nemecko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európsky zatykač"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "prokuratúra v Zwickau (Nemecko)"->"európsky zatykač"[label="Dňa 15. marca 2018"];
  "európsky zatykač"->"High Court"[label="schválil 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="zadržaný 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Državno tožilstvo v Zwickauu (Nemčija) je 15. marca 2018 zoper PI, romunskega državljana, izdalo evropski nalog za prijetje zaradi njegove predaje za uvedbo kazenskega postopka zaradi dejanj, opredeljenih kot „organiziran ali oborožen rop“. High Court (višje sodišče) je 12. septembra 2018 odobrilo izvršitev tega naloga. PI je bil 15. oktobra 2018 prijet na podlagi navedenega naloga in je od tedaj v priporu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Državno tožilstvo v Zwickauu (Nemčija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "evropski nalog za prijetje"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Državno tožilstvo v Zwickauu (Nemčija)"->"evropski nalog za prijetje"[label="15. marca 2018"];
  "evropski nalog za prijetje"->"High Court"[label="odobrilo izvršitev tega naloga 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="prijetje 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Zwickaun syyttäjäviranomainen antoi 15.3.2018 Romanian kansalaisesta PI:stä eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen, jotta hänet luovutettaisiin rikosoikeudellista menettelyä varten sellaisten tekojen perusteella, joiden tunnusmerkistö oli ryöstö rikollisryhmän jäsenenä tai aseellinen ryöstö. Ennakkoratkaisua pyytänyt tuomioistuin High Court vahvisti pidätysmääräyksen 12.9.2018 sen täytäntöönpanoa varten. PI otettiin kiinni 15.10.2018 ja hän on ollut siitä alkaen säilössä.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Zwickaun syyttäjäviranomainen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Zwickaun syyttäjäviranomainen"->"eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[label="15.3.2018"];
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"->"High Court"[label="vahvisti 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="pidätysmääräyksen 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

PI, som är rumänsk medborgare, blev den 15 mars 2018 föremål för en europeisk arresteringsorder utfärdad av åklagarmyndigheten i Zwickau (Tyskland). Syftet med arresteringsordern var att få PI överlämnad för lagföring för gärningar som kvalificerats som ”organiserad stöld eller väpnat rån”. Arresteringsorden kontrasignerades av den hänskjutande domstolen, High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål), den 12 september 2018 för verkställighet. PI greps den 15 oktober 2018 med stöd av nämnda arresteringsorder och är sedan dess frihetsberövad.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "åklagarmyndigheten i Zwickau (Tyskland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europeisk arresteringsorder"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "åklagarmyndigheten i Zwickau (Tyskland)"->"europeisk arresteringsorder"[label="15 mars 2018"];
  "europeisk arresteringsorder"->"High Court"[label="kontrasignerades 12/09/2018"];
  "High Court"->"PI"[label="arresteringsorder 15/10/2018"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

PI objected to his surrender in execution of the European arrest warrant issued in respect of him on the ground, inter alia, that the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Zwickau is not a ‘judicial authority’, within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584, which is competent to issue such a European arrest warrant.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
   "PI"->"Objected that the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Zwickau is not a ‘judicial authority’, within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584";
   "Objected that the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Zwickau is not a ‘judicial authority’, within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584"->"The Court";
   "Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584"->"Objected that the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Zwickau is not a ‘judicial authority’, within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

PI оспорва предаването му в изпълнение на свързаната с него европейска заповед за арест, като по-специално изтъква факта, че прокуратурата на Цвикау не е съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584, компетентен да издаде такава европейска заповед за арест.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "съдебен орган"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PI"->"оспорва предаването му в изпълнение на свързаната с него европейска заповед за арест, като по-специално изтъква факта, че прокуратурата на Цвикау не е съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584";
  "оспорва предаването му в изпълнение на свързаната с него европейска заповед за арест, като по-специално изтъква факта, че прокуратурата на Цвикау не е съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584"->"съдебен орган";
  "член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584"->"оспорва предаването му в изпълнение на свързаната с него европейска заповед за арест, като по-специално изтъква факта, че прокуратурата на Цвикау не е съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

PI se opuso a su entrega en virtud de la orden de detención europea dictada contra él, alegando, en particular, que la Fiscalía de Zwickau no es una «autoridad judicial», en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584, competente para emitir órdenes de detención europea.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "El Tribunal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PI"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PI"->"se opuso a su entrega en virtud de la orden de detención europea dictada contra él, alegando, en particular, que la Fiscalía de Zwickau no es una «autoridad judicial», en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584";
  "se opuso a su entrega en virtud de la orden de detención europea dictada contra él, alegando, en particular, que la Fiscalía de Zwickau no es una «autoridad judicial», en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584"->"El Tribunal";
  "artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584"->"se opuso a su entrega en virtud de la orden de detención europea dictada contra él, alegando, en particular, que la Fiscalía de Zwickau no es una «autoridad judicial», en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}