mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

18. aprillil 2014 taotleti Leedu kodaniku PF üleandmist Leedu peaprokuröri tehtud Euroopa vahistamismääruse alusel kriminaalmenetluse raames kohtu alla andmiseks seoses PF-i poolt väidetavalt 2012. aastal toime pandud kuriteoga, mis peaprokuröri kinnitusel tuleb kvalifitseerida „relvastatud röövimiseks“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Leedu kodaniku"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Leedu peaprokuröri"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Leedu kodaniku"->"18. aprillil 2014 taotleti Leedu kodaniku PF üleandmist";
  "18. aprillil 2014 taotleti Leedu kodaniku PF üleandmist"->"PF";
  "Leedu peaprokuröri"->"Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[label="kuriteoga"];
  "Euroopa vahistamismääruse"->"18. aprillil 2014 taotleti Leedu kodaniku PF üleandmist"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 18 Απριλίου 2014 ζητήθηκε η παράδοση του PF, Λιθουανού υπηκόου, σε εκτέλεση ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως το οποίο είχε εκδοθεί από τον γενικό εισαγγελέα της Λιθουανίας, στο πλαίσιο ποινικής διώξεως σε βάρος του PF για πράξεις που φέρεται να τέλεσε το έτος 2012, οι οποίες χαρακτηρίστηκαν από τον εν λόγω εισαγγελέα ως «ένοπλη ληστεία».

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Λιθουανού υπηκόου"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "γενικό εισαγγελέα της Λιθουανίας"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Λιθουανού υπηκόου"->"Στις 18 Απριλίου 2014 ζητήθηκε η παράδοση";
  "Στις 18 Απριλίου 2014 ζητήθηκε η παράδοση"->"PF";
  "γενικό εισαγγελέα της Λιθουανίας"->"ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως"[label="εκδοθεί"];
  "ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως"->"Στις 18 Απριλίου 2014 ζητήθηκε η παράδοση"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: French

Le 18 avril 2014, la remise de PF, un ressortissant lituanien, a été demandée en application d’un mandat d’arrêt européen émis par le procureur général de Lituanie, aux fins de poursuites pénales pour des faits que PF aurait commis au cours de l’année 2012 et qui, selon ce procureur, doivent être qualifiés de « vol à main armée ».

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "un ressortissant lituanien"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "le procureur général de Lituanie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "un ressortissant lituanien"->"Le 18 avril 2014, la remise de PF";
  "Le 18 avril 2014, la remise de PF"->"PF";
  "le procureur général de Lituanie"->"mandat d’arrêt européen"[label="émis"];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"->"Le 18 avril 2014, la remise de PF"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Dana 18. travnja 2014. zatražena je predaja osobe PF, litavskog državljanina, u okviru izvršenja europskog uhidbenog naloga koji je izdao Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve radi provedbe kaznenog postupka zbog kaznenog djela koje je PF navodno počinio tijekom 2012., a koje je taj državni odvjetnik okvalificirao kao „oružanu krađu”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "litavskog državljanina"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europskog uhidbenog naloga"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "litavskog državljanina"->"Dana 18. travnja 2014. zatražena je predaja";
  "Dana 18. travnja 2014. zatražena je predaja"->"PF";
  "Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve"->"europskog uhidbenog naloga"[label="izdao"];
  "europskog uhidbenog naloga"->"Dana 18. travnja 2014. zatražena je predaja"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 18 aprile 2014 è stata richiesta la consegna di PF, cittadino lituano, in applicazione di un mandato d’arresto europeo emesso dal procuratore generale di Lituania ai fini dell’esercizio di un’azione penale per fatti che PF avrebbe commesso nel corso del 2012 e che, secondo tale procuratore, devono essere qualificati come «rapina a mano armata».

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "cittadino lituano"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "il procuratore generale di Lituania"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "cittadino lituano"->"Il 18 aprile 2014 è stata richiesta la consegna";
  "Il 18 aprile 2014 è stata richiesta la consegna"->"PF";
  "il procuratore generale di Lituania"->"mandato d’arresto europeo"[label="mandato d’arresto europeo emesso"];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"->"Il 18 aprile 2014 è stata richiesta la consegna"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

2014. gada 18. aprīlī atbilstoši Lietuvas ģenerālprokurora izsniegtam Eiropas apcietināšanas orderim tika lūgta Lietuvas pilsoņa PF nodošana kriminālvajāšanai par noziedzīgiem nodarījumiem, ko PF esot izdarījis 2012. gadā un kas minētā prokurora ieskatā kvalificējami kā “bruņota laupīšana”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Lietuvas pilsoņa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Lietuvas ģenerālprokurora"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Lietuvas pilsoņa"->"2014. gada 18. aprīlī";
  "2014. gada 18. aprīlī"->"PF";
  "Lietuvas ģenerālprokurora"->"Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[label="2014. gada 18. aprīlī"];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"->"2014. gada 18. aprīlī"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2014 m. balandžio 18 d. remiantis Lietuvos generalinio prokuroro išduotu Europos arešto orderiu buvo paprašyta perduoti PF, Lietuvos pilietį, siekiant vykdyti baudžiamąjį persekiojimą dėl 2012 m. PF padarytų veikų, kurios, šio prokuroro teigimu, turi būti kvalifikuojamos kaip „plėšimas panaudojant šaunamąjį ginklą“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Lietuvos pilietį"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Lietuvos generalinio prokuroro"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europos arešto orderis"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Lietuvos pilietį"->"2014 m. balandžio 18 d.";
  "2014 m. balandžio 18 d."->"PF";
  "Lietuvos generalinio prokuroro"->"Europos arešto orderis"[label="išduotu"];
  "Europos arešto orderis"->"2014 m. balandžio 18 d."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2014. április 18‑án a Litvánia főügyésze által kibocsátott európai elfogatóparancs alapján kérték PF átadását az általa állítólagosan 2012‑ben elkövetett, ezen ügyész által „fegyveres rablásnak” minősített cselekmények miatti büntetőeljárás lefolytatása céljából.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Litvánia főügyésze"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "a Litvánia főügyésze"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európai elfogatóparancs"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Litvánia főügyésze"->"2014. április 18";
  "2014. április 18"->"PF";
  "a Litvánia főügyésze"->"európai elfogatóparancs"[label="2014. április 18‑án a Litvánia főügyésze által kibocsátott európai elfogatóparancs"];
  "európai elfogatóparancs"->"2014. április 18"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fit-18 ta’ April 2014, intalbet il-konsenja ta’ PF, ċittadin Litwan, taħt mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew maħruġ mill-Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja għall-finijiet ta’ prosekuzzjoni kriminali għal fatti li PF allegatament wettaq matul l-2012 u li, skont dan il-Prosekutur, għandhom jiġu kklassifikati bħala “serqa bl-użu ta’ armi”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "ċittadin Litwan"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "ċittadin Litwan"->"Fit-18 ta’ April 2014";
  "Fit-18 ta’ April 2014"->"PF";
  "Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja"->"mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[label="18 ta’ April 2014"];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"->"Fit-18 ta’ April 2014"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 18 april 2014 werd de overlevering gevraagd van PF, een Litouws staatsburger, op grond van een door de procureur-generaal van Litouwen uitgevaardigd Europees aanhoudingsbevel met het oog op strafvervolging voor feiten die PF in de loop van 2012 zou hebben begaan en die volgens die procureur als „gewapende overval” moeten worden aangemerkt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "een Litouws staatsburger"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de procureur-generaal van Litouwen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "een Litouws staatsburger"->"Op 18 april 2014 werd de overlevering gevraagd";
  "Op 18 april 2014 werd de overlevering gevraagd"->"PF";
  "de procureur-generaal van Litouwen"->"Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[label="uitgevaardigd"];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"->"Op 18 april 2014 werd de overlevering gevraagd"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 18 kwietnia 2014 r. prokurator generalny Litwy złożył wniosek o przekazanie PF, obywatela litewskiego, na podstawie europejskiego nakazu aresztowania wydanego w celu przeprowadzenia postępowania karnego w związku z czynami, jakie PF miał popełnić w 2012 r. i które według tego prokuratora należy zakwalifikować jako „kradzież z bronią w ręku”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "obywatela litewskiego"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "prokurator generalny Litwy"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europejskiego nakazu aresztowania"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "obywatela litewskiego"->"18 kwietnia 2014 r.";
  "18 kwietnia 2014 r."->"PF";
  "prokurator generalny Litwy"->"europejskiego nakazu aresztowania"[label="wydanego"];
  "europejskiego nakazu aresztowania"->"18 kwietnia 2014 r."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 18 de abril de 2014, foi pedida a entrega de PF, um nacional lituano, em aplicação de um mandado de detenção europeu emitido pelo Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia, para efeitos de procedimentos penais por atos que PF terá cometido durante 2012 e que, segundo esse procurador, devem ser qualificados de «roubo à mão armada».

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "um nacional lituano"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "um nacional lituano"->"Em 18 de abril de 2014, foi pedida a entrega de PF";
  "Em 18 de abril de 2014, foi pedida a entrega de PF"->"PF";
  "Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia"->"mandado de detenção europeu"[label="emitido"];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"->"Em 18 de abril de 2014, foi pedida a entrega de PF"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 18 aprilie 2014 a fost solicitată predarea lui PF, resortisant lituanian, în temeiul unui mandat european de arestare emis de procurorul general al Lituaniei pentru efectuarea urmăririi penale pentru fapte pe care PF le‑ar fi comis în cursul anului 2012 și care, potrivit acestui procuror, trebuie să fie calificate drept „jaf armat”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "resortisant lituanian"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "procurorul general al Lituaniei"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat european de arestare"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "resortisant lituanian"->"La 18 aprilie 2014 a fost solicitată predarea lui PF";
  "La 18 aprilie 2014 a fost solicitată predarea lui PF"->"PF";
  "procurorul general al Lituaniei"->"mandat european de arestare"[label="emis de procurorul general al Lituaniei"];
  "mandat european de arestare"->"La 18 aprilie 2014 a fost solicitată predarea lui PF"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 18. apríla 2014 Generálna prokuratúra Litvy vydala európsky zatykač, ktorým požiadala o odovzdanie PF, litovského štátneho príslušníka, na účely vedenia trestného stíhania za skutky, ktorých sa PF mal dopustiť v priebehu roka 2012 a ktoré sa podľa uvedenej prokuratúry majú kvalifikovať ako „ozbrojená lúpež“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "litovského štátneho príslušníka"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Generálna prokuratúra Litvy"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európsky zatykač"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "litovského štátneho príslušníka"->"Dňa 18. apríla 2014 Generálna prokuratúra Litvy vydala európsky zatykač, ktorým požiadala o odovzdanie PF";
  "Dňa 18. apríla 2014 Generálna prokuratúra Litvy vydala európsky zatykač, ktorým požiadala o odovzdanie PF"->"PF";
  "Generálna prokuratúra Litvy"->"európsky zatykač"[label="vydala"];
  "európsky zatykač"->"Dňa 18. apríla 2014 Generálna prokuratúra Litvy vydala európsky zatykač, ktorým požiadala o odovzdanie PF"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Generalni državni tožilec Litve je 18. aprila 2014 na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje zahteval predajo PF, litovskega državljana, zaradi kazenskega pregona zaradi dejanj, ki naj bi jih PF storil leta 2012 in ki jih je to državno tožilstvo opredelilo kot „oborožen rop“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "litovskega državljana"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Generalni državni tožilec Litve"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "evropskega naloga za prijetje"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "litovskega državljana"->"18. aprila 2014";
  "18. aprila 2014"->"PF";
  "Generalni državni tožilec Litve"->"evropskega naloga za prijetje"[label="oborožen rop"];
  "evropskega naloga za prijetje"->"18. aprila 2014"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Liettuan kansalaisen PF:n luovuttamista pyydettiin Liettuan yleisen syyttäjän 18.4.2014 antaman eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen nojalla rikosoikeudellista menettelyä varten sellaisten tekojen perusteella, joihin PF:n epäiltiin syyllistyneen vuonna 2012 ja jotka täyttävät yleisen syyttäjän mukaan aseellisen ryöstön tunnusmerkistön.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Liettuan kansalaisen PF:n"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Liettuan yleisen syyttäjän"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Liettuan kansalaisen PF:n"->"18.4.2014";
  "18.4.2014"->"PF";
  "Liettuan yleisen syyttäjän"->"eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[label="18.4.2014 antaman eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"];
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"->"18.4.2014"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Den 18 april 2014 framställdes en begäran om att PF, som är litauisk medborgare, skulle överlämnas med stöd av en europeisk arresteringsorder som utfärdats av Litauens riksåklagare. Begäran framställdes för att PF skulle kunna lagföras för gärningar som han ska ha begått under år 2012 och som enligt åklagaren ska kvalificeras som ”väpnat rån”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "litauisk medborgare"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Litauens riksåklagare"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europeisk arresteringsorder"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "litauisk medborgare"->"Den 18 april 2014";
  "Den 18 april 2014"->"PF";
  "Litauens riksåklagare"->"europeisk arresteringsorder"[label="18 april 2014"];
  "europeisk arresteringsorder"->"Den 18 april 2014"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: English

PF brought an action before the High Court challenging the validity of that European arrest warrant, on the ground, inter alia, that the Prosecutor General of Lithuania is not a ‘judicial authority’ within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "PF"->"Bring an action";
   "Bring an action"->"The High Court";
   "Bring an action"->"The validity of that European arrest warrant"[dir=none];
   "The validity of that European arrest warrant"->"The Prosecutor General of Lithuania is not a ‘judicial authority’ within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

PF подава пред High Court (Висш съд) жалба, с която оспорва валидността на тази европейска заповед за арест, като по-специално изтъква факта, че главният прокурор на Литва не е съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"подава пред High Court (Висш съд) жалба";
  "подава пред High Court (Висш съд) жалба"->"The High Court";
  "подава пред High Court (Висш съд) жалба"->"валидността на тази европейска заповед за арест"[dir=none];
  "валидността на тази европейска заповед за арест"->"главният прокурор на Литва не е съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

PF interpuso recurso ante la High Court (Tribunal Superior) mediante el que impugnó la validez de dicha orden de detención europea, alegando en particular que el Fiscal General de Lituania no es una «autoridad judicial» en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"interpuso recurso";
  "interpuso recurso"->"The High Court";
  "interpuso recurso"->"la validez de dicha orden de detención europea"[dir=none];
  "la validez de dicha orden de detención europea"->"el Fiscal General de Lituania no es una «autoridad judicial» en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

PF podal k High Court (Vrchní soud) žalobu směřující ke zpochybnění platnosti tohoto evropského zatýkacího rozkazu, přičemž se dovolával zejména toho, že nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy není „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"podal žalobu";
  "podal žalobu"->"The High Court";
  "podal žalobu"->"platnosti tohoto evropského zatýkacího rozkazu"[dir=none];
  "platnosti tohoto evropského zatýkacího rozkazu"->"nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy není „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

PF anlagde sag ved High Court (ret i første instans) med henblik på at anfægte gyldigheden af den europæiske arrestordre, idet PF bl.a. påberåbte sig den omstændighed, at Litauens øverste anklager ikke er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"anlagde sag";
  "anlagde sag"->"The High Court";
  "anlagde sag"->"gyldigheden af den europæiske arrestordre"[dir=none];
  "gyldigheden af den europæiske arrestordre"->"Litauens øverste anklager ikke er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584. 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: German

PF erhob vor dem High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) Klage und stellte die Gültigkeit des Europäischen Haftbefehls u. a. mit dem Einwand in Abrede, dass der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen keine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 sei.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"erhob vor dem High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) Klage";
  "erhob vor dem High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) Klage"->"The High Court";
  "erhob vor dem High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) Klage"->"die Gültigkeit des Europäischen Haftbefehls"[dir=none];
  "die Gültigkeit des Europäischen Haftbefehls"->"dass der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen keine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

PF esitas High Courtile (kõrge kohus) kaebuse, millega vaidlustas selle Euroopa vahistamismääruse kehtivuse, tuginedes eelkõige asjaolule, et Leedu peaprokurör ei ole „õigusasutus“ raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"esitas kaebuse";
  "esitas kaebuse"->"The High Court";
  "esitas kaebuse"->"selle Euroopa vahistamismääruse kehtivus"[dir=none];
  "selle Euroopa vahistamismääruse kehtivus"->"Leedu peaprokurör ei ole „õigusasutus“ raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses. 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Ο PF προσέφυγε ενώπιον του High Court (ανώτερου δικαστηρίου) αμφισβητώντας την εγκυρότητα αυτού του ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως και προβάλλοντας, μεταξύ άλλων, ότι ο γενικός εισαγγελέας της Λιθουανίας δεν είναι «δικαστική αρχή» κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"προσέφυγε";
  "προσέφυγε"->"The High Court";
  "προσέφυγε"->"την εγκυρότητα αυτού του ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως"[dir=none];
  "την εγκυρότητα αυτού του ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως"->"ότι ο γενικός εισαγγελέας της Λιθουανίας δεν είναι «δικαστική αρχή» κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584. 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: French

PF a saisi la High Court (Haute Cour) d’un recours tendant à contester la validité de ce mandat d’arrêt européen en invoquant, notamment, le fait que le procureur général de Lituanie n’est pas une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"d'un recours";
  "d'un recours"->"The High Court";
  "d'un recours"->"la validité de ce mandat d’arrêt européen"[dir=none];
  "la validité de ce mandat d’arrêt européen"->"le fait que le procureur général de Lituanie n’est pas une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

PF je pred High Courtom (Visoki sud) osporavao valjanost tog europskog uhidbenog naloga pozivajući se, osobito, na činjenicu da Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve nije „pravosudno tijelo” u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. Okvirne odluke 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"osporavao valjanost";
  "osporavao valjanost"->"The High Court";
  "osporavao valjanost"->"valjanost tog europskog uhidbenog naloga"[dir=none];
  "valjanost tog europskog uhidbenog naloga"->"Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve nije „pravosudno tijelo” u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. Okvirne odluke 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

PF ha proposto dinanzi alla High Court (Alta Corte) un ricorso volto a contestare la validità di tale mandato d’arresto europeo, sostenendo, segnatamente, che il procuratore generale di Lituania non è un’«autorità giudiziaria», ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"ha proposto dinanzi alla High Court (Alta Corte) un ricorso volto a contestare la validità di tale mandato d’arresto europeo";
  "ha proposto dinanzi alla High Court (Alta Corte) un ricorso volto a contestare la validità di tale mandato d’arresto europeo"->"The High Court";
  "ha proposto dinanzi alla High Court (Alta Corte) un ricorso volto a contestare la validità di tale mandato d’arresto europeo"->"la validità di tale mandato d’arresto europeo"[dir=none];
  "la validità di tale mandato d’arresto europeo"->"che il procuratore generale di Lituania non è un’«autorità giudiziaria», ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

PF cēla prasību High Court (Augstā tiesa), apstrīdot šī Eiropas apcietināšanas ordera spēkā esamību, tostarp norādot, ka Lietuvas ģenerālprokurors nav “tiesu iestāde” Pamatlēmuma 2002/584 6. panta 1. punkta izpratnē.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"cēla prasību";
  "cēla prasību"->"The High Court";
  "cēla prasību"->"šī Eiropas apcietināšanas ordera spēkā esamību"[dir=none];
  "šī Eiropas apcietināšanas ordera spēkā esamību"->"Lietuvas ģenerālprokurors nav “tiesu iestāde” Pamatlēmuma 2002/584 6. panta 1. punkta izpratnē. 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

PF High Court (Aukštasis teismas) pateikė skundą, juo siekė užginčyti šio Europos arešto orderio galiojimą, visų pirma remdamasis tuo, kad Lietuvos generalinis prokuroras nėra „teisminė institucija“, kaip tai suprantama pagal Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 6 straipsnio 1 dalį.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"pateikė skundą";
  "pateikė skundą"->"The High Court";
  "pateikė skundą"->"šio Europos arešto orderio galiojimą"[dir=none];
  "šio Europos arešto orderio galiojimą"->"Lietuvos generalinis prokuroras nėra „teisminė institucija“, kaip tai suprantama pagal Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 6 straipsnio 1 dalį. 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

PF keresetet indított a High Court (felsőbíróság) előtt ezen európai elfogatóparancs érvényességének vitatása céljából, többek között arra hivatkozva, hogy Litvánia főügyésze nem a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése értelmében vett „igazságügyi hatóság”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"keresetet indított";
  "keresetet indított"->"The High Court";
  "keresetet indított"->"ezen európai elfogatóparancs érvényességének"[dir=none];
  "ezen európai elfogatóparancs érvényességének"->"Litvánia főügyésze nem a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése értelmében vett „igazságügyi hatóság”. 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

PF ressaq rikors quddiem il-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) biex jikkontesta l-validità ta’ dak il-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew, b’riferiment b’mod partikolari għall-fatt li l-Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja ma huwiex “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"ressaq rikors";
  "ressaq rikors"->"The High Court";
  "ressaq rikors"->"l-validità ta’ dak il-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[dir=none];
  "l-validità ta’ dak il-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"->"Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja ma huwiex “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

PF heeft bij de High Court beroep ingesteld ter betwisting van de geldigheid van dit Europees aanhoudingsbevel, waarbij hij onder meer betoogde dat de procureur-generaal van Litouwen geen „rechterlijke autoriteit” in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 is.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"beroep ingesteld";
  "beroep ingesteld"->"The High Court";
  "beroep ingesteld"->"de geldigheid van dit Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[dir=none];
  "de geldigheid van dit Europees aanhoudingsbevel"->"de procureur-generaal van Litouwen geen „rechterlijke autoriteit” in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 is. 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

PF wniósł do High Court (wysokiego trybunału) skargę w celu podważenia ważności tego europejskiego nakazu aresztowania, powołując się w szczególności na fakt, że prokurator generalny Litwy nie jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"wniósł do High Court skargę";
  "wniósł do High Court skargę"->"The High Court";
  "wniósł do High Court skargę"->"ważności tego europejskiego nakazu aresztowania"[dir=none];
  "ważności tego europejskiego nakazu aresztowania"->"Prokurator generalny Litwy nie jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

PF recorreu à High Court (Tribunal Superior) no sentido de contestar a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu invocando, nomeadamente, o facto de o Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia não ser uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"recorreu à High Court (Tribunal Superior) no sentido de contestar a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu";
  "recorreu à High Court (Tribunal Superior) no sentido de contestar a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu"->"The High Court";
  "recorreu à High Court (Tribunal Superior) no sentido de contestar a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu"->"a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu"[dir=none];
  "a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu"->"o Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia não ser uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}