mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: French

Le 30 septembre 2011, RE a saisi le conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (France) pour contester son licenciement et en formant diverses demandes, notamment en paiement des sommes de 941,15 euros, au titre d’un rappel de l’indemnité de licenciement, et de 1423,79 euros, au titre d’un rappel de l’allocation de congé de reclassement.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (France))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"a saisi le conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (France) pour contester son licenciement 30/09/2011";
  "a saisi le conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (France) pour contester son licenciement 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (France))";
  "a saisi le conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (France) pour contester son licenciement 30/09/2011"->"en paiement des sommes de 941,15 euros, au titre d’un rappel de l’indemnité de licenciement, et de 1423,79 euros, au titre d’un rappel de l’allocation de congé de reclassement.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Dana 30. rujna 2011. pokrenula je postupak pred conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Radni sud u Toulouseu, Francuska) kako bi osporila svoj otkaz te je podnijela različite zahtjeve, među ostalim, onaj za isplatu iznosa od 941,15 eura na ime nadoplate otpremnine i iznosa od 1423,79 eura na ime nadoplate doplatka za dopust radi prekvalifikacije.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Radni sud u Toulouseu, Francuska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"pokrenula je postupak 30/09/2011";
  "pokrenula je postupak 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Radni sud u Toulouseu, Francuska)";
  "pokrenula je postupak 30/09/2011"->"isplatu iznosa od 941,15 eura na ime nadoplate otpremnine i iznosa od 1423,79 eura na ime nadoplate doplatka za dopust radi prekvalifikacije.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 30 settembre 2011, RE ha adito il conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunale del lavoro di Tolosa, Francia) contestando il licenziamento e proponendo varie domande, in particolare per ottenere il pagamento di EUR 941,15 a titolo di integrazione dell’indennità di licenziamento ed EUR 1423,79 a titolo di integrazione dell’assegno per congedo di riqualificazione.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunale del lavoro di Tolosa, Francia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"ha adito 30/09/2011";
  "ha adito 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunale del lavoro di Tolosa, Francia)";
  "ha adito 30/09/2011"->"il pagamento di EUR 941,15 a titolo di integrazione dell’indennità di licenziamento ed EUR 1423,79 a titolo di integrazione dell’assegno per congedo di riqualificazione.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

2011. gada 30. septembrī RE vērsās conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse [Tulūzas Darba strīdu padomē] (Francija), pārsūdzot savu atlaišanu un izvirzot vairākus prasījumus, it īpaši par 941,15 EUR atlaišanas pabalsta papildinājumu un 1423,79 EUR pārkvalifikācijas atvaļinājuma pabalsta papildinājumu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzas Darba strīdu padome, Francija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"vērsās 30/09/2011";
  "vērsās 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzas Darba strīdu padome, Francija)";
  "vērsās 30/09/2011"->"941,15 EUR atlaišanas pabalsta papildinājumu un 1423,79 EUR pārkvalifikācijas atvaļinājuma pabalsta papildinājumu.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2011 m. rugsėjo 30 d. RE kreipėsi į conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas, Prancūzija), norėdama užginčyti atleidimą iš darbo, ir pateikė įvairių prašymų, be kita ko, reikalaudama sumokėti 941,15 EUR išeitinę kompensaciją ir 1423,79 EUR kvalifikacijos keitimo išmoką.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas, Prancūzija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"kreipėsi į conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas, Prancūzija), norėdama užginčyti atleidimą iš darbo 30/09/2011";
  "kreipėsi į conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas, Prancūzija), norėdama užginčyti atleidimą iš darbo 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas, Prancūzija)";
  "kreipėsi į conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas, Prancūzija), norėdama užginčyti atleidimą iš darbo 30/09/2011"->"sumokėti 941,15 EUR išeitinę kompensaciją ir 1423,79 EUR kvalifikacijos keitimo išmoką.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2011. szeptember 30‑án RE a conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse‑hoz (toulouse‑i munkaügyi bíróság, Franciaország) fordult az elbocsátásának megtámadása céljából, és különböző kérelmeket terjesztett elő, többek között 941,15 euró összegű hátralékos végkielégítés, valamint 1423,79 euró összegű hátralékos, átképzési szabadság alatti támogatás megfizetése érdekében.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (toulouse‑i munkaügyi bíróság, Franciaország)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"az elbocsátásának megtámadása céljából 30/09/2011";
  "az elbocsátásának megtámadása céljából 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (toulouse‑i munkaügyi bíróság, Franciaország)";
  "az elbocsátásának megtámadása céljából 30/09/2011"->"941,15 euró összegű hátralékos végkielégítés, valamint 1423,79 euró összegű hátralékos, átképzési szabadság alatti támogatás megfizetése."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fit-30 ta’ Settembru 2011, RE adixxiet lill-Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (il-Qorti Industrijali ta’ Toulouse, Franza) sabiex tikkontesta t-tkeċċija tagħha u billi għamlet diversi talbiet, b’mod partikolari għall-ħlas tas-somom ta’ EUR 941.15, bħala ħlas b’lura tal-allowance ta’ tkeċċija, u ta’ EUR 1 423.79, bħala ħlas b’lura tal-allowance ta’ leave ta’ klassifikazzjoni mill-ġdid.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (il-Qorti Industrijali ta’ Toulouse, Franza)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"adixxiet 30/09/2011";
  "adixxiet 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (il-Qorti Industrijali ta’ Toulouse, Franza)";
  "adixxiet 30/09/2011"->"ħlas tas-somom ta’ EUR 941.15, bħala ħlas b’lura tal-allowance ta’ tkeċċija, u ta’ EUR 1 423.79, bħala ħlas b’lura tal-allowance ta’ leave ta’ klassifikazzjoni mill-ġdid.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 30 september 2011 heeft RE zich tot de conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbeidsrechter Toulouse, Frankrijk) gewend om haar ontslag aan te vechten en verschillende verzoeken in te dienen, met name tot betaling van een achterstallige ontslagvergoeding van 941,15 EUR en van een achterstallige re‑integratieverlofuitkering van 1423,79 EUR.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbeidsrechter Toulouse, Frankrijk)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"gewend om haar ontslag aan te vechten en verschillende verzoeken in te dienen 30/09/2011";
  "gewend om haar ontslag aan te vechten en verschillende verzoeken in te dienen 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbeidsrechter Toulouse, Frankrijk)";
  "gewend om haar ontslag aan te vechten en verschillende verzoeken in te dienen 30/09/2011"->"betaling van een achterstallige ontslagvergoeding van 941,15 EUR en van een achterstallige re‑integratieverlofuitkering van 1423,79 EUR.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 30 września 2011 r. RE wniosła powództwo do conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (sądu pracy w Tuluzie, Francja), kwestionując zwolnienie i zgłaszając różne roszczenia, w szczególności roszczenie o zapłatę kwoty 941,15 EUR tytułem zaległej odprawy z tytułu rozwiązania stosunku pracy oraz kwoty 1423,79 EUR tytułem zaległego zasiłku wypłacanego w związku z urlopem na przekwalifikowanie.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (sądu pracy w Tuluzie, Francja)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"wniosła powództwo 30/09/2011";
  "wniosła powództwo 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (sądu pracy w Tuluzie, Francja)";
  "wniosła powództwo 30/09/2011"->"zapłatę kwoty 941,15 EUR tytułem zaległej odprawy z tytułu rozwiązania stosunku pracy oraz kwoty 1423,79 EUR tytułem zaległego zasiłku wypłacanego w związku z urlopem na przekwalifikowanie.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 30 de setembro de 2011, RE recorreu ao conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal do Trabalho de Toulouse, França) para impugnar o seu despedimento e apresentar diversos pedidos, nomeadamente o pagamento dos montantes de 941,15 euros a título de complemento da indemnização por despedimento, e de 1423,79 euros, a título de complemento do subsídio de licença de requalificação.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal do Trabalho de Toulouse, França)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"recorreu ao conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal do Trabalho de Toulouse, França) para impugnar o seu despedimento e apresentar diversos pedidos 30/09/2011";
  "recorreu ao conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal do Trabalho de Toulouse, França) para impugnar o seu despedimento e apresentar diversos pedidos 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal do Trabalho de Toulouse, França)";
  "recorreu ao conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal do Trabalho de Toulouse, França) para impugnar o seu despedimento e apresentar diversos pedidos 30/09/2011"->"o pagamento dos montantes de 941,15 euros a título de complemento da indemnização por despedimento, e de 1423,79 euros, a título de complemento do subsídio de licença de requalificação.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 30 septembrie 2011, RE a sesizat conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunalul Muncii din Toulouse, Franța) pentru a contesta concedierea sa, formulând diverse cereri, printre care și una de plată a sumei de 941,15 euro, cu titlu de indemnizație restantă de concediere, și a sumei de 1423,79 euro, cu titlu de alocație restantă pentru concediul de reorientare profesională.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunalul Muncii din Toulouse, Franța)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"a sesizat conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse 30/09/2011";
  "a sesizat conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunalul Muncii din Toulouse, Franța)";
  "a sesizat conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse 30/09/2011"->"plată a sumei de 941,15 euro, cu titlu de indemnizație restantă de concediere, și a sumei de 1423,79 euro, cu titlu de alocație restantă pentru concediul de reorientare profesională.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

RE sa 30. septembra 2011 obrátila na Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Pracovný súd Toulouse, Francúzsko), pričom spochybnila svoje prepustenie a podala viacero návrhov, a to najmä na zaplatenie sumy 941,15 eura ako doplatku k odstupnému a 1423,79 eura ako dodatočného príspevku počas prípravného rekvalifikačného voľna.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Pracovný súd Toulouse, Francúzsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"obrátila na Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Pracovný súd Toulouse, Francúzsko), pričom spochybnila svoje prepustenie a podala viacero návrhov 30/09/2011";
  "obrátila na Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Pracovný súd Toulouse, Francúzsko), pričom spochybnila svoje prepustenie a podala viacero návrhov 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Pracovný súd Toulouse, Francúzsko)";
  "obrátila na Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Pracovný súd Toulouse, Francúzsko), pričom spochybnila svoje prepustenie a podala viacero návrhov 30/09/2011"->"zaplatenie sumy 941,15 eura ako doplatku k odstupnému a 1423,79 eura ako dodatočného príspevku počas prípravného rekvalifikačného voľna.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

RE je 30. septembra 2011 vložila tožbo pri conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (delovno sodišče v Toulousu, Francija), s katero je izpodbijala odpoved pogodbe o zaposlitvi ter vložila več zahtevkov, med drugim za plačilo zneska v višini 941,15 EUR iz naslova neplačane odpravnine in zneska v višini 1423,79 EUR iz naslova neplačanega nadomestila za prezaposlovanje.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (delovno sodišče v Toulousu, Francija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"vložila tožbo 30/09/2011";
  "vložila tožbo 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (delovno sodišče v Toulousu, Francija)";
  "vložila tožbo 30/09/2011"->"plačilo zneska v višini 941,15 EUR iz naslova neplačane odpravnine in zneska v višini 1423,79 EUR iz naslova neplačanega nadomestila za prezaposlovanje.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

RE nosti 30.9.2011 conseil de prud’hommes de Toulousessa (Toulousen työtuomioistuin, Ranska) kanteen, jolla hän riitautti irtisanomisensa ja esitti kahdeksan erilaista vaatimusta, jotka koskivat muun muassa 941,15 euron maksamista maksamattomana irtisanomiskorvauksena ja 1423,79 euron maksamista maksamattomana uudelleentyöllistymisvapaalta maksettavana avustuksena.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Toulousen työtuomioistuin, Ranska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"nosti kanteen 30/09/2011";
  "nosti kanteen 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Toulousen työtuomioistuin, Ranska)";
  "nosti kanteen 30/09/2011"->"941,15 euron maksamista maksamattomana irtisanomiskorvauksena ja 1423,79 euron maksamista maksamattomana uudelleentyöllistymisvapaalta maksettavana avustuksena.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Den 30 september 2011 väckte hon talan vid conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbetsdomstolen i Toulouse, Frankrike) varvid hon bestred uppsägningen och framställde olika yrkanden, bland annat om ersättning med 941,15 euro för uteblivet avgångsvederlag och 1423,79 euro för uteblivet omskolningsbidrag.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbetsdomstolen i Toulouse, Frankrike)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "RE"->"väckte hon talan 30/09/2011";
  "väckte hon talan 30/09/2011"->"conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbetsdomstolen i Toulouse, Frankrike)";
  "väckte hon talan 30/09/2011"->"ersättning med 941,15 euro för uteblivet avgångsvederlag och 1423,79 euro för uteblivet omskolningsbidrag.."[dir=none];

}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: English

On 30 September 2011, RE brought proceedings before the conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Labour Tribunal, Toulouse, France) to contest her dismissal and made several claims, in particular, for the payment of EUR 941.15 in respect of outstanding redundancy pay and of EUR 1 423.79 in respect of outstanding redeployment leave allowance.
By judgment of 12 September 2013, that court dismissed RE’s two claims.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Labour Tribunal, Toulouse, France)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "The conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Labour Tribunal, Toulouse, France)"->"Judgement 12/09/2013";
   "Judgement 12/09/2013"->"RE";
   "Judgement 12/09/2013"->"Dismiss 2 claims"[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 30 септември 2011 г. RE обжалва уволнението си пред Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза, Франция), като предявява две искания, а именно за плащане на дължима към обезщетението ѝ при уволнение сума от 941,15 EUR и за плащане на дължима към обезщетението ѝ при отпуск за преквалификация сума от 1423,79 EUR.
Двете искания на RE са отхвърлени от съда с решение от 12 септември 2013 г.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза, Франция)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Съд по трудови спорове Тулуза, Франция)"->"решение от 12 септември 2013 г. 12/09/2013";
  "решение от 12 септември 2013 г. 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "решение от 12 септември 2013 г. 12/09/2013"->"Двете искания на RE са отхвърлени от съда"[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 30 de septiembre de 2011, RE acudió al conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal Laboral Paritario de Toulouse, Francia) para impugnar su despido y formular diversas pretensiones, en particular el abono de 941,15 euros en concepto de atrasos de la indemnización por despido y de 1423,79 euros en concepto de atrasos del subsidio por permiso de recolocación.
Mediante sentencia de 12 de septiembre de 2013, dicho órgano jurisdiccional desestimó estas dos pretensiones de RE.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal Laboral Paritario de Toulouse, Francia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunal Laboral Paritario de Toulouse, Francia)"->"sentencia de 12 de septiembre de 2013 12/09/2013";
  "sentencia de 12 de septiembre de 2013 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "sentencia de 12 de septiembre de 2013 12/09/2013"->"desestimó estas dos pretensiones"[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dne 30. září 2011 se obrátila na conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (pracovní soud v Toulouse, Francie) a své propuštění zpochybnila, přičemž podala několik návrhů, a to zejména návrh na zaplacení částky 941,15 eur z titulu neuhrazeného odstupného při propuštění a částky 1423,79 eur z titulu neuhrazeného příspěvku po dobu rekvalifikačního volna.
Rozsudkem ze dne 12. září 2013 uvedený soud tyto dva návrhy RE zamítl.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (pracovní soud v Toulouse, Francie)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (pracovní soud v Toulouse, Francie)"->"Rozsudkem 12/09/2013";
  "Rozsudkem 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "Rozsudkem 12/09/2013"->"tyto dva návrhy RE zamítl."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den 30. september 2011 anlagde RE sag ved conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbejdsretten i Toulouse, Frankrig) for at anfægte sin afskedigelse og nedlagde forskellige påstande, bl.a. om betaling af et beløb på 941,15 EUR for udestående fratrædelsesgodtgørelse og et beløb på 1423,79 EUR for udestående ydelse under omskolingsorlov.
Ved dom af 12. september 2013 frifandt denne ret Praxair MRC med hensyn til disse to påstande, som RE havde nedlagt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbejdsretten i Toulouse, Frankrig)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (arbejdsretten i Toulouse, Frankrig)"->"dom af 12. september 2013 12/09/2013";
  "dom af 12. september 2013 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "dom af 12. september 2013 12/09/2013"->"frifandt denne ret Praxair MRC med hensyn til disse to påstande"[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: German

Am 30. September 2011 rief RE den Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Arbeitsgericht Toulouse, Frankreich) an, um ihre Entlassung anzufechten, und stellte verschiedene Anträge, u. a. auf Zahlung eines Betrags von 941,15 Euro im Rahmen einer Neuberechnung der Entlassungsentschädigung und eines Betrags von 1423,79 Euro im Rahmen einer Neuberechnung der Zuwendung für einen Wiedereingliederungsurlaub.
Mit Urteil vom 12. September 2013 wies dieses Gericht diese beiden Anträge von RE ab.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Arbeitsgericht Toulouse, Frankreich)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Arbeitsgericht Toulouse, Frankreich)"->"Urteil vom 12. September 2013 12/09/2013";
  "Urteil vom 12. September 2013 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "Urteil vom 12. September 2013 12/09/2013"->"wies dieses Gericht diese beiden Anträge von RE ab."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

RE pöördus 30. septembril 2011 Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse’i (töövaidluskohus, Prantsusmaa), vaidlustades oma koondamise ning esitades erinevad nõuded, eelkõige nõude maksta 941,15 eurot maksmata koondamishüvitist ning 1423,79 eurot maksmata ümberpaigutamispuhkuse toetust.
Conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse’i (Toulouse’i töövaidluskomisjon) 12. septembri 2013. aasta otsusega jäeti need kaks RE nõuet rahuldamata.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (töövaidluskohus, Prantsusmaa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (töövaidluskohus, Prantsusmaa)"->"12. septembri 2013. aasta otsus 12/09/2013";
  "12. septembri 2013. aasta otsus 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "12. septembri 2013. aasta otsus 12/09/2013"->"jäeti need kaks RE nõuet rahuldamata."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 30 Σεπτεμβρίου 2011, η RE προσέφυγε στο conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Τουλούζης, Γαλλία), προσβάλλοντας την απόλυσή της και προβάλλοντας διάφορα αιτήματα, μεταξύ των οποίων αίτημα καταβολής ποσού 941,15 ευρώ, λόγω οφειλόμενης αποζημίωσης απόλυσης, και αίτημα καταβολής ποσού 1 423,79 ευρώ, λόγω οφειλόμενου επιδόματος άδειας επανένταξης.
Με αποφάσεις της 12ης Σεπτεμβρίου 2013, το εν λόγω δικαστήριο απέρριψε τα δύο αυτά αιτήματα της RE.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Τουλούζης, Γαλλία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (δικαστήριο εργατικών διαφορών Τουλούζης, Γαλλία)"->"αποφάσεις 12/09/2013";
  "αποφάσεις 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "αποφάσεις 12/09/2013"->"απέρριψε τα δύο αυτά αιτήματα της RE."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: French

Le 30 septembre 2011, RE a saisi le conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (France) pour contester son licenciement et en formant diverses demandes, notamment en paiement des sommes de 941,15 euros, au titre d’un rappel de l’indemnité de licenciement, et de 1423,79 euros, au titre d’un rappel de l’allocation de congé de reclassement.
Par jugement du 12 septembre 2013, cette juridiction a rejeté ces deux demandes de RE.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (France))"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (France))"->"Par jugement du 12 septembre 2013 12/09/2013";
  "Par jugement du 12 septembre 2013 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "Par jugement du 12 septembre 2013 12/09/2013"->"a rejeté ces deux demandes de RE."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Dana 30. rujna 2011. pokrenula je postupak pred conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Radni sud u Toulouseu, Francuska) kako bi osporila svoj otkaz te je podnijela različite zahtjeve, među ostalim, onaj za isplatu iznosa od 941,15 eura na ime nadoplate otpremnine i iznosa od 1423,79 eura na ime nadoplate doplatka za dopust radi prekvalifikacije.
Taj je sud presudom od 12. rujna 2013. odbio ta dva zahtjeva osobe RE.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Radni sud u Toulouseu, Francuska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Radni sud u Toulouseu, Francuska)"->"presudom 12/09/2013";
  "presudom 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "presudom 12/09/2013"->"odbio ta dva zahtjeva"[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 30 settembre 2011, RE ha adito il conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunale del lavoro di Tolosa, Francia) contestando il licenziamento e proponendo varie domande, in particolare per ottenere il pagamento di EUR 941,15 a titolo di integrazione dell’indennità di licenziamento ed EUR 1423,79 a titolo di integrazione dell’assegno per congedo di riqualificazione.
Con decisione del 12 settembre 2013, detto giudice ha respinto le due domande di RE.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunale del lavoro di Tolosa, Francia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tribunale del lavoro di Tolosa, Francia)"->"decisione del 12 settembre 2013 12/09/2013";
  "decisione del 12 settembre 2013 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "decisione del 12 settembre 2013 12/09/2013"->"ha respinto le due domande di RE."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

2011. gada 30. septembrī RE vērsās conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse [Tulūzas Darba strīdu padomē] (Francija), pārsūdzot savu atlaišanu un izvirzot vairākus prasījumus, it īpaši par 941,15 EUR atlaišanas pabalsta papildinājumu un 1423,79 EUR pārkvalifikācijas atvaļinājuma pabalsta papildinājumu.
Ar 2013. gada 12. septembra spriedumu šī tiesa noraidīja šos RE prasījumus.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzas Darba strīdu padome, Francija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzas Darba strīdu padome, Francija)"->"2013. gada 12. septembra spriedumu 12/09/2013";
  "2013. gada 12. septembra spriedumu 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "2013. gada 12. septembra spriedumu 12/09/2013"->"noraidīja šos RE prasījumus."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2011 m. rugsėjo 30 d. RE kreipėsi į conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas, Prancūzija), norėdama užginčyti atleidimą iš darbo, ir pateikė įvairių prašymų, be kita ko, reikalaudama sumokėti 941,15 EUR išeitinę kompensaciją ir 1423,79 EUR kvalifikacijos keitimo išmoką.
2013 m. rugsėjo 12 d. sprendimu tas teismas atmetė abu šiuos RE prašymus.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas, Prancūzija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (Tulūzos darbo ginčų teismas, Prancūzija)"->"sprendimu 12/09/2013";
  "sprendimu 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "sprendimu 12/09/2013"->"atmetė abu šiuos RE prašymus."[dir=none];
        
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2011. szeptember 30‑án RE a conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse‑hoz (toulouse‑i munkaügyi bíróság, Franciaország) fordult az elbocsátásának megtámadása céljából, és különböző kérelmeket terjesztett elő, többek között 941,15 euró összegű hátralékos végkielégítés, valamint 1423,79 euró összegű hátralékos, átképzési szabadság alatti támogatás megfizetése érdekében.
A 2013. szeptember 12‑i ítéletével ez a bíróság RE e két kérelmét elutasította.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (toulouse‑i munkaügyi bíróság, Franciaország)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "conseil de prud’hommes de Toulouse (toulouse‑i munkaügyi bíróság, Franciaország)"->"2013. szeptember 12‑i ítéletével 12/09/2013";
  "2013. szeptember 12‑i ítéletével 12/09/2013"->"RE";
  "2013. szeptember 12‑i ítéletével 12/09/2013"->"RE e két kérelmét elutasította."[dir=none];
        
}