mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

TC, der er genstand for den omhandlede europæiske arrestordre, er en britisk statsborger, som er bosiddende i Spanien, og som er mistænkt for som øverste ansvarlige i en kriminel organisation at have medvirket til import, distribution og salg af hårde stoffer, bl.a. 300 kg kokain. Den maksimale straf for en sådan forbrydelse er efter lovgivningen i Det Forenede Kongerige en frihedsstraf på livstid.
TC blev den 4. april 2018 anholdt i Nederlandene. På denne dato begyndte fristen på 60 dage for at træffe afgørelse om fuldbyrdelse af den omhandlede europæiske arrestordre i henhold til OLW’s artikel 22, stk. 1, og artikel 17, stk. 3, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584 at løbe.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "europæiske arrestordre"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "OLW’s artikel 22, stk. 1, og artikel 17, stk. 3, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "europæiske arrestordre"->"anholdt 04/04/2018";
  "anholdt 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "anholdt 04/04/2018"->"På denne dato begyndte fristen på 60 dage for at træffe afgørelse om fuldbyrdelse af den omhandlede europæiske arrestordre 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "På denne dato begyndte fristen på 60 dage for at træffe afgørelse om fuldbyrdelse af den omhandlede europæiske arrestordre 04/04/2018"->"OLW’s artikel 22, stk. 1, og artikel 17, stk. 3, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

TC, gegen den der in Rede stehende Europäische Haftbefehl ausgestellt wurde, ist ein britischer Staatsangehöriger mit Wohnsitz in Spanien. Er wird verdächtigt, als ranghohes Mitglied einer kriminellen Vereinigung an der Einfuhr, dem Vertrieb und dem Verkauf harter Drogen, insbesondere von 300 kg Kokain, beteiligt gewesen zu sein. Für diese Straftat sieht das Recht des Vereinigen Königreichs als Höchststrafe eine lebenslange Freiheitsstrafe vor.
TC wurde am 4. April 2018 in den Niederlanden festgenommen. An diesem Tag begann die in Art. 22 Abs. 1 OLW und Art. 17 Abs. 3 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 vorgesehene Frist von 60 Tagen für den Erlass einer Entscheidung über die Vollstreckung des in Rede stehenden Europäischen Haftbefehls zu laufen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Europäische Haftbefehl"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Art. 22 Abs. 1 OLW und Art. 17 Abs. 3 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Europäische Haftbefehl"->"festgenommen 04/04/2018";
  "festgenommen 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "festgenommen 04/04/2018"->"diesem Tag begann die in Art. 22 Abs. 1 OLW und Art. 17 Abs. 3 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 vorgesehene Frist von 60 Tagen für den Erlass einer Entscheidung über die Vollstreckung des in Rede stehenden Europäischen Haftbefehls zu laufen. 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "diesem Tag begann die in Art. 22 Abs. 1 OLW und Art. 17 Abs. 3 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 vorgesehene Frist von 60 Tagen für den Erlass einer Entscheidung über die Vollstreckung des in Rede stehenden Europäischen Haftbefehls zu laufen. 04/04/2018"->"Art. 22 Abs. 1 OLW und Art. 17 Abs. 3 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

TC, kelle suhtes on kõnealune vahistamismäärus tehtud, on Hispaanias elav Briti kodanik, keda kahtlustatakse selles, et ta osales organiseeritud kuritegeliku ühenduse prominentse liikmena tugeva toimega narkootikumide (sealhulgas 300 kilogrammi kokaiini) importimises, laialiveos ja müügis. Selle teo eest Ühendkuningriigi õiguses ette nähtud maksimaalne karistus on eluaegne vangistus.
TC vahistati Madalmaades 4. aprillil 2018. OLW artikli 22 lõikes 1 ja raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 17 lõikes 3 ette nähtud 60‑päevane kõnealuse Euroopa vahistamismääruse täitmise otsuse tegemise tähtaeg hakkas kulgema sellest kuupäevast.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Euroopa vahistamismäärus"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "OLW artikli 22 lõikes 1 ja raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 17 lõikes 3 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Euroopa vahistamismäärus"->"vahistati 04/04/2018";
  "vahistati 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "vahistati 04/04/2018"->"sellest kuupäevast. 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "sellest kuupäevast. 04/04/2018"->"OLW artikli 22 lõikes 1 ja raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 17 lõikes 3 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Ο TC, εις βάρος του οποίου εκδόθηκε το επίμαχο ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως, είναι Βρετανός υπήκοος που κατοικεί στην Ισπανία και φέρεται ότι, ως εγκέφαλος εγκληματικής οργανώσεως, μετείχε στην εισαγωγή, διακίνηση και πώληση σκληρών ναρκωτικών, συγκεκριμένα 300 κιλών κοκαΐνης. Η μέγιστη ποινή που προβλέπεται στο δίκαιο του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου για το αδίκημα αυτό είναι η ισόβια κάθειρξη.
Ο TC συνελήφθη στις Κάτω Χώρες στις 4 Απριλίου 2018. Από την ημέρα εκείνη άρχισε να τρέχει η προβλεπόμενη στο άρθρο 22, παράγραφος 1, του OLW και στο άρθρο 17, παράγραφος 3, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584 προθεσμία των εξήντα ημερών για την έκδοση αποφάσεως περί εκτελέσεως του επίμαχου ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "άρθρο 22, παράγραφος 1, του OLW και στο άρθρο 17, παράγραφος 3, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα συλλήψεως"->"συνελήφθη 04/04/2018";
  "συνελήφθη 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "συνελήφθη 04/04/2018"->"Από την ημέρα εκείνη άρχισε να τρέχει η προβλεπόμενη στο άρθρο 22, παράγραφος 1, του OLW και στο άρθρο 17, παράγραφος 3, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584 προθεσμία των εξήντα ημερών 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "Από την ημέρα εκείνη άρχισε να τρέχει η προβλεπόμενη στο άρθρο 22, παράγραφος 1, του OLW και στο άρθρο 17, παράγραφος 3, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584 προθεσμία των εξήντα ημερών 04/04/2018"->"άρθρο 22, παράγραφος 1, του OLW και στο άρθρο 17, παράγραφος 3, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

TC, qui fait l’objet du mandat d’arrêt européen en cause, est un ressortissant britannique qui réside en Espagne et qui est soupçonné d’avoir, en tant que haut responsable d’une organisation criminelle, participé à l’importation, la distribution et la vente de drogues dures, notamment de 300 kg de cocaïne. Pour un tel crime, la peine maximale prévue par le droit du Royaume-Uni est la réclusion à perpétuité.
TC a été arrêté aux Pays-Bas le 4 avril 2018. Le délai de soixante jours pour l’adoption de la décision d’exécution du mandat d’arrêt européen en cause, prévu à l’article 22, paragraphe 1, de l’OLW et à l’article 17, paragraphe 3, de la décision-cadre 2002/584, a commencé à courir à compter de cette date.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "l’article 22, paragraphe 1, de l’OLW et à l’article 17, paragraphe 3, de la décision-cadre 2002/584 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"->"a été arrêté 04/04/2018";
  "a été arrêté 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "a été arrêté 04/04/2018"->"a commencé à courir à compter de cette date. 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "a commencé à courir à compter de cette date. 04/04/2018"->"l’article 22, paragraphe 1, de l’OLW et à l’article 17, paragraphe 3, de la décision-cadre 2002/584 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

TC, protiv kojeg je izdan predmetni europski uhidbeni nalog, britanski je državljanin s prebivalištem u Španjolskoj koji je osumnjičen da je kao vrlo važan član zločinačkog udruženja sudjelovao u uvozu, distribuciji i prodaji teških droga, uključujući 300 kg kokaina. Za to je kazneno djelo maksimalna kazna predviđena pravom Ujedinjene Kraljevine doživotni zatvor.
TC je uhićen u Nizozemskoj 4. travnja 2018. Rok od šezdeset dana za donošenje odluke o izvršenju predmetnog europskog uhidbenog naloga, propisan člankom 22. stavkom 1. OLW‑a i člankom 17. stavkom 3. Okvirne odluke 2002/584, počeo je teći tog dana.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "europski uhidbeni nalog"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "člankom 22. stavkom 1. OLW‑a i člankom 17. stavkom 3. Okvirne odluke 2002/584 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "europski uhidbeni nalog"->"uhićen 04/04/2018";
  "uhićen 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "uhićen 04/04/2018"->"Rok od šezdeset dana za donošenje odluke o izvršenju predmetnog europskog uhidbenog naloga, počeo je teći tog dana. 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "Rok od šezdeset dana za donošenje odluke o izvršenju predmetnog europskog uhidbenog naloga, počeo je teći tog dana. 04/04/2018"->"člankom 22. stavkom 1. OLW‑a i člankom 17. stavkom 3. Okvirne odluke 2002/584 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

TC, che è oggetto del mandato d’arresto europeo in questione, è un cittadino britannico residente in Spagna, sospettato di aver partecipato, quale membro di spicco di un’organizzazione criminale, all’importazione, alla distribuzione e alla vendita di droghe pesanti, in particolare di 300 kg di cocaina. Per un simile reato, la pena massima prevista dal diritto del Regno Unito è l’ergastolo.
TC è stato arrestato nei Paesi Bassi il 4 aprile 2018. Il termine di sessanta giorni per l’adozione della decisione di esecuzione del mandato d’arresto europeo in questione, previsto all’articolo 22, paragrafo 1, dell’OLW e all’articolo 17, paragrafo 3, della decisione quadro 2002/584, ha iniziato a decorrere dalla stessa data.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "articolo 22, paragrafo 1, dell’OLW e all’articolo 17, paragrafo 3, della decisione quadro 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"->"arrestato 04/04/2018";
  "arrestato 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "arrestato 04/04/2018"->"Il termine di sessanta giorni per l’adozione della decisione di esecuzione del mandato d’arresto europeo in questione, ha iniziato a decorrere dalla stessa data. 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "Il termine di sessanta giorni per l’adozione della decisione di esecuzione del mandato d’arresto europeo in questione, ha iniziato a decorrere dalla stessa data. 04/04/2018"->"articolo 22, paragrafo 1, dell’OLW e all’articolo 17, paragrafo 3, della decisione quadro 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

TC, attiecībā uz kuru izdots attiecīgais Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis, ir Lielbritānijas pilsonis, kurš dzīvo Spānijā un kā noziedzīgas organizācijas augsta ranga dalībnieks tiek turēts aizdomās par dalību smago narkotiku, it īpaši 300 kg kokaīna, ievešanu, izplatīšanu un tirdzniecību. Par šādu noziegumu Apvienotās Karalistes tiesībās paredzētais maksimālais sods ir mūža ieslodzījums.
TC tika aizturēts Nīderlandes Karalistē 2018. gada 4. aprīlī. OLW 22. panta 1. punktā un Pamatlēmuma 2002/584/TI 17. panta 3. punktā paredzētais sešdesmit dienu termiņš lēmuma par Eiropas apcietināšanas ordera izpildi pieņemšanai sākas šajā datumā.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "OLW 22. panta 1. punktā un Pamatlēmuma 2002/584/TI 17. panta 3. punktā 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"->"aizturēts 04/04/2018";
  "aizturēts 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "aizturēts 04/04/2018"->"šajā datumā. 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "šajā datumā. 04/04/2018"->"OLW 22. panta 1. punktā un Pamatlēmuma 2002/584/TI 17. panta 3. punktā 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

TC, dėl kurio išduotas nagrinėjamas Europos arešto orderis, yra Ispanijoje nuolat gyvenantis Didžiosios Britanijos pilietis, įtariamas tuo, kad būdamas nusikalstamo susivienijimo aukšto rango narys dalyvavo įvežant, platinant ir parduodant stiprius narkotikus, be kita ko, 300 kg kokaino. Pagal Jungtinės Karalystės teisę didžiausia už tokį nusikaltimą numatyta bausmė yra laisvės atėmimas iki gyvos galvos.
2018 m. balandžio 4 d. TC buvo sulaikytas Nyderlanduose. Tą dieną pradėtas skaičiuoti OLW 22 straipsnio 1 dalyje ir Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 17 straipsnio 3 dalyje nustatytas 60 dienų terminas, per kurį turėjo būti priimtas sprendimas dėl nagrinėjamo Europos arešto orderio vykdymo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Europos arešto orderis"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "OLW 22 straipsnio 1 dalyje ir Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 17 straipsnio 3 dalyje 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Europos arešto orderis"->"sulaikytas 04/04/2018";
  "sulaikytas 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "sulaikytas 04/04/2018"->"Tą dieną pradėtas skaičiuoti OLW 22 straipsnio 1 dalyje ir Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 17 straipsnio 3 dalyje nustatytas 60 dienų terminas 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "Tą dieną pradėtas skaičiuoti OLW 22 straipsnio 1 dalyje ir Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 17 straipsnio 3 dalyje nustatytas 60 dienų terminas 04/04/2018"->"OLW 22 straipsnio 1 dalyje ir Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 17 straipsnio 3 dalyje 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

TC‑t, akivel szemben a szóban forgó európai elfogatóparancsot kibocsátották, Spanyolországban lakóhellyel rendelkező brit állampolgár, akit egy bűnszervezet irányítójaként kemény kábítószer, nevezetesen 300 kg kokain behozatalával, terjesztésével és értékesítésével gyanúsítanak. E bűncselekmény miatt az Egyesült Királyság joga szerint az életfogytig tartó szabadságvesztés a maximálisan kiszabható büntetés.
TC‑t Hollandiában 2018. április 4‑én fogták el. A határozathozatalra az OLW 22. cikkének (1) bekezdésében és a 2002/584 kerethatározat 17. cikkének (3) bekezdésében előírt 60 napos határidő ezen időpontban kezdődött el.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Európai elfogatóparancs"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "OLW 22. cikkének (1) bekezdésében és a 2002/584 kerethatározat 17. cikkének (3) bekezdésében 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Európai elfogatóparancs"->"fogták el 04/04/2018";
  "fogták el 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "fogták el 04/04/2018"->"Ezen időpontban kezdődött el. 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "Ezen időpontban kezdődött el. 04/04/2018"->"OLW 22. cikkének (1) bekezdésében és a 2002/584 kerethatározat 17. cikkének (3) bekezdésében 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Maltese

TC, li huwa s-suġġett tal-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew inkwistjoni, huwa ċittadin Brittaniku residenti fi Spanja u li huwa ssuspettat li, bħala membru b’responsabbiltà għolja ta’ organizzazzjoni kriminali, ipparteċipa fl-importazzjoni, fid-distribuzzjoni u l-bejgħ ta’ drogi qawwija, b’mod partikolari ta’ 300 kg kokaina. Il-piena massima prevista mid-dritt tar-Renju Unit għal tali reat hija ta’ għomor il-ħabs.
Fl‑4 ta’ April 2018, TC kien ġie arrestat fil-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi. It-terminu ta’ 60 jum għall-adozzjoni tad-deċiżjoni ta’ eżekuzzjoni tal-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew inkwistjoni, previst fl-Artikolu 22(1) tal-OLW u fl-Artikolu 17(3) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584, beda jiddekorri minn din id-data.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Artikolu 22(1) tal-OLW u fl-Artikolu 17(3) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"->"Ġie arrestat 04/04/2018";
  "Ġie arrestat 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "Ġie arrestat 04/04/2018"->"It-terminu ta’ 60 jum għall-adozzjoni tad-deċiżjoni ta’ eżekuzzjoni tal-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew inkwistjoni, previst fl-Artikolu 22(1) tal-OLW u fl-Artikolu 17(3) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584, beda jiddekorri minn din id-data. 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "It-terminu ta’ 60 jum għall-adozzjoni tad-deċiżjoni ta’ eżekuzzjoni tal-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew inkwistjoni, previst fl-Artikolu 22(1) tal-OLW u fl-Artikolu 17(3) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584, beda jiddekorri minn din id-data. 04/04/2018"->"Artikolu 22(1) tal-OLW u fl-Artikolu 17(3) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Dutch

TC, tegen wie het Europees aanhoudingsbevel in kwestie is uitgevaardigd, is Brits onderdaan en woont in Spanje. Hij wordt ervan verdacht als prominent lid van een criminele organisatie te zijn betrokken bij de invoer, het verstrekken en het verkopen van harddrugs, onder meer 300 kg cocaïne. Op een dergelijk ernstig misdrijf is naar het recht van het Verenigd Koninkrijk maximaal een levenslange vrijheidsstraf gesteld.
TC is op 4 april 2018 in Nederland aangehouden. Op die dag is de in artikel 22, lid 1, OLW en artikel 17, lid 3, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 vastgestelde termijn van 60 dagen voor het nemen van de beslissing over de tenuitvoerlegging van het Europees aanhoudingsbevel in kwestie ingegaan.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artikel 22, lid 1, OLW en artikel 17, lid 3, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"->"aangehouden 04/04/2018";
  "aangehouden 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "aangehouden 04/04/2018"->"Op die dag is de in artikel 22, lid 1, OLW en artikel 17, lid 3, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 vastgestelde termijn van 60 dagen voor het nemen van de beslissing over de tenuitvoerlegging van het Europees aanhoudingsbevel in kwestie ingegaan. 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "Op die dag is de in artikel 22, lid 1, OLW en artikel 17, lid 3, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 vastgestelde termijn van 60 dagen voor het nemen van de beslissing over de tenuitvoerlegging van het Europees aanhoudingsbevel in kwestie ingegaan. 04/04/2018"->"artikel 22, lid 1, OLW en artikel 17, lid 3, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Polish

Rozpatrywany europejski nakaz aresztowania został wydany wobec TC, obywatela brytyjskiego zamieszkującego w Hiszpanii podejrzanego o udział, jako wysokiej rangi członek grupy przestępczej, w przywozie, rozprowadzaniu i sprzedaży twardych narkotyków, w tym 300 kg kokainy. Zgodnie z prawem Zjednoczonego Królestwa wspomniane wyżej przestępstwo jest zagrożone maksymalnie karą dożywotniego pozbawienia wolności.
W dniu 4 kwietnia 2018 r. TC został zatrzymany w Niderlandach. Tego też dnia rozpoczął się bieg 60-dniowego terminu, o którym mowa w art. 22 ust. 1 OLW i art. 17 ust. 3 decyzji ramowej 2002/584, na wydanie decyzji w sprawie wykonania europejskiego nakazu aresztowania.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "europejski nakaz aresztowania"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "art. 22 ust. 1 OLW i art. 17 ust. 3 decyzji ramowej 2002/584 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "europejski nakaz aresztowania"->"zatrzymany 04/04/2018";
  "zatrzymany 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "zatrzymany 04/04/2018"->"Tego też dnia rozpoczął się bieg 60-dniowego terminu 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "Tego też dnia rozpoczął się bieg 60-dniowego terminu 04/04/2018"->"art. 22 ust. 1 OLW i art. 17 ust. 3 decyzji ramowej 2002/584 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

TC, que é objeto do mandado de detenção europeu em causa, é um cidadão britânico residente em Espanha suspeito de ter participado, enquanto alto responsável de uma organização criminosa, na importação, distribuição e venda de drogas duras, designadamente de 300 kg de cocaína. Para este crime está prevista pelo direito do Reino Unido a pena máxima de prisão perpétua.
TC foi detido nos Países Baixos em 4 de abril de 2018. O prazo de 60 dias para a adoção da decisão de execução de um mandado de detenção europeu, previsto no artigo 22.o, n.o 1, da OLW e no artigo 17.o, n.o 3, da decisão‑quadro 2002/584, começou a correr nessa data.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "mandado de detenção europeu"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artigo 22.o, n.o 1, da OLW e no artigo 17.o, n.o 3, da decisão‑quadro 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "mandado de detenção europeu"->"detido 04/04/2018";
  "detido 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "detido 04/04/2018"->"O prazo de 60 dias para a adoção da decisão de execução de um mandado de detenção europeu, começou a correr nessa data. 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "O prazo de 60 dias para a adoção da decisão de execução de um mandado de detenção europeu, começou a correr nessa data. 04/04/2018"->"artigo 22.o, n.o 1, da OLW e no artigo 17.o, n.o 3, da decisão‑quadro 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Romanian

TC, împotriva căruia a fost emis mandatul european de arestare în cauză, este un resortisant britanic cu reședința în Spania și care este suspectat că a participat, în calitate de înalt responsabil al unei organizații criminale, la importul, la distribuția și la vânzarea de droguri tari, în special a 300 kg de cocaină. Pentru o asemenea infracțiune, pedeapsa maximă prevăzută de dreptul Regatului Unit este detențiunea pe viață.
TC a fost arestat în Țările de Jos la 4 aprilie 2018. Termenul de șaizeci de zile pentru adoptarea deciziei de executare a mandatului european de arestare prevăzut la articolul 22 alineatul 1 din OLW și la articolul 17 alineatul (3) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584 a început să curgă începând de la acea dată.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "mandatul european de arestare"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "articolul 22 alineatul 1 din OLW și la articolul 17 alineatul (3) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "mandatul european de arestare"->"a fost arestat 04/04/2018";
  "a fost arestat 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "a fost arestat 04/04/2018"->"Termenul de șaizeci de zile pentru adoptarea deciziei de executare a mandatului european de arestare a început să curgă începând de la 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "Termenul de șaizeci de zile pentru adoptarea deciziei de executare a mandatului european de arestare a început să curgă începând de la 04/04/2018"->"articolul 22 alineatul 1 din OLW și la articolul 17 alineatul (3) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovak

TC, voči ktorému bol vydaný predmetný európsky zatykač, je britský štátny príslušník, ktorý má bydlisko v Španielsku a je podozrivý, že sa ako vedúci predstaviteľ zločineckej organizácie podieľal na dovoze, distribúcii a predaji tvrdých drog, najmä 300 kg kokaínu. Za tento trestný čin je podľa práva Spojeného kráľovstva najvyšším možným trestom trest odňatia slobody na doživotie.
TC bol zatknutý v Holandsku 4. apríla 2018. Lehota šesťdesiat dní na prijatie rozhodnutia o vykonaní dotknutého európskeho zatykača upravená v § 22 ods. 1 OLW a v článku 17 ods. 3 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584 začala plynúť v tento deň.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "európsky zatykač"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "§ 22 ods. 1 OLW a v článku 17 ods. 3 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "európsky zatykač"->"zatknutý 04/04/2018";
  "zatknutý 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "zatknutý 04/04/2018"->"Lehota šesťdesiat dní začala plynúť v tento deň. 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "Lehota šesťdesiat dní začala plynúť v tento deň. 04/04/2018"->"§ 22 ods. 1 OLW a v článku 17 ods. 3 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

TC, zoper katerega je bil izdan zadevni evropski nalog za prijetje, je britanski državljan s prebivališčem v Španiji, ki je osumljen, da je kot eden od vodilnih v kriminalni organizaciji sodeloval pri uvozu, distribuciji in prodaji trdih drog, med drugim 300 kilogramov kokaina. Za to kaznivo dejanje je najvišja zagrožena kazen po pravu Združenega kraljestva kazen dosmrtnega zapora.
TC je bil 4. aprila 2018 prijet na Nizozemskem. Tega dne je začel teči 60-dnevni rok za sprejetje odločitve o izvršitvi zadevnega evropskega naloga za prijetje iz člena 22(1) OLW in člena 17(3) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "evropski nalog za prijetje"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "člena 22(1) OLW in člena 17(3) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584. 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "evropski nalog za prijetje"->"prijet 04/04/2018";
  "prijet 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "prijet 04/04/2018"->"Tega dne je začel teči 60-dnevni rok 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "Tega dne je začel teči 60-dnevni rok 04/04/2018"->"člena 22(1) OLW in člena 17(3) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584. 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Kyseessä olevan eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen kohteena oleva TC on Ison-Britannian kansalainen, joka asuu Espanjassa ja jonka epäillään erään rikollisjärjestön ylemmän tason johtajana osallistuneen kovien huumeiden, ja etenkin 300 kg:n suruisen kokaiinierän, tuontiin, jakeluun ja myyntiin. Tällaisesta rikoksesta Yhdistyneen kuningaskunnan oikeudessa säädetty enimmäisrangaistus on elinkautinen vankeus.
TC otettiin 4.4.2018 kiinni Alankomaissa. Kyseisestä päivästä alkoi kulua OLW:n 22 §:n 1 momentin ja puitepäätöksen 2002/584 17 artiklan 3 kohdan mukainen 60 päivän määräaika kyseessä olevan eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen täytäntöönpanoa koskevan päätöksen tekemiselle.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "OLW:n 22 §:n 1 momentin ja puitepäätöksen 2002/584 17 artiklan 3 kohdan 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen"->"otettiin kiinni 04/04/2018";
  "otettiin kiinni 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "otettiin kiinni 04/04/2018"->"Kyseisestä päivästä alkoi kulua 60 päivän määräaika 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "Kyseisestä päivästä alkoi kulua 60 päivän määräaika 04/04/2018"->"OLW:n 22 §:n 1 momentin ja puitepäätöksen 2002/584 17 artiklan 3 kohdan 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Swedish

TC, som är föremål för den aktuella europeiska arresteringsordern, är brittisk medborgare med hemvist i Spanien. Han är misstänkt för att i egenskap av ledare för en kriminell organisation ha deltagit i införsel, distribution och försäljning av tung narkotika, bland annat 300 kg kokain. För ett sådant brott är det längsta straff som föreskrivs i den nationella rätten i Förenade kungariket fängelse på livstid.
TC greps i Nederländerna den 4 april 2018. Den frist på 60 dagar för att verkställa den europeiska arresteringsordern som föreskrivs i artikel 22.1 OLW och i artikel 17.3 i rambeslut 2002/584/RIF började löpa från och med denna dag.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "europeiska arresteringsordern"[shape=trapezium];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "artikel 22.1 OLW och i artikel 17.3 i rambeslut 2002/584/RIF 2002/584"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "europeiska arresteringsordern"->"greps 04/04/2018";
  "greps 04/04/2018"->"TC";
  "greps 04/04/2018"->"Den frist på 60 dagar började löpa från och med denna dag. 04/04/2018"[dir=none];
  "Den frist på 60 dagar började löpa från och med denna dag. 04/04/2018"->"artikel 22.1 OLW och i artikel 17.3 i rambeslut 2002/584/RIF 2002/584"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

The referring court, the rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court, Amsterdam, Netherlands), examined the European arrest warrant at issue at the hearing on 31 May 2018. At the end of that hearing, it ordered that TC be kept in detention and extended the time limit for taking a decision on the execution of the European arrest warrant at issue by 30 days. By interim decision of 14 June 2018, the referring court reopened the investigation, stayed the proceedings pending the reply by the Court of Justice to the request for a preliminary ruling made on 17 May 2018 in the case that has since resulted in the judgment of 19 September 2018, RO (C‑327/18 PPU, EU:C:2018:733), and stated that the decision period was to be suspended from 14 June 2018 until delivery of the judgment in that case.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court, Amsterdam, Netherlands)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Court of Justice"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "The rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court, Amsterdam, Netherlands)"->"Interim decision 14/06/2018";
   "Interim decision 14/06/2018"->"TC";
   "Interim decision 14/06/2018"->"The decision period was to be suspended from 14/06/2018 until delivery of the judgment."[dir=none];
   "The rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court, Amsterdam, Netherlands)"->"Court of Justice"[label="Request for a preliminary ruling made on 17/05/2018"];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.
TC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.
Case C-492/18 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

В съдебно заседание на 31 май 2018 г. запитващата юрисдикция Rechtbank Amsterdam (Първоинстанционен съд, Амстердам, Нидерландия) е разгледала посочената европейска заповед за арест. Във връзка с това тя е разпоредила продължаване на задържането на TC и е удължила с тридесет дни срока за постановяване на решението за изпълнение на разглежданата европейска заповед за арест. С междинно решение от 14 юни 2018 г. посочената юрисдикция възобновява устните състезания, спира производството по делото до получаване на отговор от Съда по преюдициално запитване, отправено на 17 май 2018 г. по делото, по което междувременно е постановено решение от 19 септември 2018 г., RO (C‑327/18 PPU, EU:C:2018:733), и уточнява, че срокът за постановяване на решението се спира, считано от 14 юни 2018 г., до датата на постановяване на последно посоченото решение.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "rechtbank Amsterdam (Първоинстанционен съд, Амстердам, Нидерландия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "TC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Съда"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "rechtbank Amsterdam (Първоинстанционен съд, Амстердам, Нидерландия)"->"междинно решение 14/06/2018";
  "междинно решение 14/06/2018"->"TC";
  "междинно решение 14/06/2018"->"срокът за постановяване на решението се спира, считано от 14 юни 2018 г., до датата на постановяване на последно посоченото решение.."[dir=none];
  "rechtbank Amsterdam (Първоинстанционен съд, Амстердам, Нидерландия)"->"Съда"[label="преюдициално запитване, отправено на 17/05/2018"];
}