mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 22 novembre 1999, RE è stata assunta da Materials Research Corporation, divenuta Praxair MRC, in qualità di assistente commerciale, nel contesto di un contratto di lavoro a tempo determinato e in regime di tempo pieno. Con un’appendice del 21 luglio 2000, questo contratto di lavoro è stato trasformato in un contratto in regime di tempo pieno a tempo indeterminato, a far data dal 1o agosto 2000.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Il 22 novembre 1999, RE è stata assunta da Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999";
  "Il 22 novembre 1999, RE è stata assunta da Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "Il 22 novembre 1999, RE è stata assunta da Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999"->"contratto di lavoro a tempo determinato e in regime di tempo pieno"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"un’appendice 21/07/2000";
  "un’appendice 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "un’appendice 21/07/2000"->"1o agosto 2000 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

1999. gada 22. novembrī RE tika pieņemta darbā par tirdzniecības asistenti sabiedrībā Material Research, tagad – sabiedrība Praxair MRC, atbilstoši darba līgumam uz noteiktu laiku un pilnu darba laiku. Ar 2000. gada 21. jūlija papildvienošanos viņas darba līgums kopš 2000. gada 1. augusta ir kļuvis par darba līgumu uz nenoteiktu laiku un pilnu darba laiku.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"tika pieņemta darbā 22/11/1999";
  "tika pieņemta darbā 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "tika pieņemta darbā 22/11/1999"->"darba līgumam uz noteiktu laiku un pilnu darba laiku."[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"The phrase"Attendum"is not found in the provided legal text. 21/07/2000";
  "The phrase"Attendum"is not found in the provided legal text. 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "The phrase"Attendum"is not found in the provided legal text. 21/07/2000"->"kopš 2000. gada 1. augusta ir kļuvis par darba līgumu uz nenoteiktu laiku un pilnu darba laiku. 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

1999 m. lapkričio 22 d. RE buvo įdarbinta Materials Research Corporation, kuri tapo Praxair MRC, į prekybos padėjėjos pareigas pagal terminuotą darbo sutartį dėl darbo visą dieną. 2000 m. liepos 21 d. pakeitimu ši darbo sutartis nuo 2000 m. rugpjūčio 1 d. buvo pakeista į neterminuotą darbo sutartį dėl darbo visą dieną.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"buvo įdarbinta 22/11/1999";
  "buvo įdarbinta 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "buvo įdarbinta 22/11/1999"->"Terminuotą darbo sutartį dėl darbo visą dieną"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Attendum 21/07/2000";
  "Attendum 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "Attendum 21/07/2000"->"nuo 2000 m. rugpjūčio 1 d. buvo pakeista į neterminuotą darbo sutartį dėl darbo visą dieną. 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

RE 1999. november 22‑től a Materials Research Corporation – jelenleg Praxair MRC – alkalmazásában állt mint kereskedelmi asszisztens, teljes munkaidőben, határozott idejű munkaszerződéssel. A 2000. július 21‑i módosítás ezt a munkaszerződést 2000. augusztus 1‑jétől teljes munkaidőre szóló, határozatlan idejű munkaszerződéssé alakította át.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"alkalmazásában állt mint kereskedelmi asszisztens, teljes munkaidőben, határozott idejű munkaszerződéssel. 22/11/1999";
  "alkalmazásában állt mint kereskedelmi asszisztens, teljes munkaidőben, határozott idejű munkaszerződéssel. 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "alkalmazásában állt mint kereskedelmi asszisztens, teljes munkaidőben, határozott idejű munkaszerződéssel. 22/11/1999"->"határozott idejű munkaszerződéssel"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Attendum 21/07/2000";
  "Attendum 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "Attendum 21/07/2000"->"2000. augusztus 1‑jétől teljes munkaidőre szóló, határozatlan idejű munkaszerződéssé 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fit-22 ta’ Novembru 1999, RE ġiet irreklutata minn Materials Research Corporation, li saret Praxair MRC, fil-kwalità ta’ assistent kummerċjali, fil‑kuntest ta’ kuntratt ta’ xogħol għal żmien determinat u full‑time. B’emenda tal‑21 ta’ Lulju 2000, dan il-kuntratt ta’ xogħol ġie mibdul f’kuntratt full‑time għal żmien indeterminat, mill-1 ta’ Awwissu 2000.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Fit-22 ta’ Novembru 1999, RE ġiet irreklutata minn Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999";
  "Fit-22 ta’ Novembru 1999, RE ġiet irreklutata minn Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "Fit-22 ta’ Novembru 1999, RE ġiet irreklutata minn Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999"->"kuntratt ta’ xogħol għal żmien determinat u full‑time"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"B’emenda tal‑21 ta’ Lulju 2000 21/07/2000";
  "B’emenda tal‑21 ta’ Lulju 2000 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "B’emenda tal‑21 ta’ Lulju 2000 21/07/2000"->"full‑time għal żmien indeterminat, mill-1 ta’ Awwissu 2000. 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

RE is op 22 november 1999 in dienst getreden van Materials Research Corporation, thans Praxair MRC, als verkoopassistente met een voltijdse arbeidsovereenkomst voor bepaalde tijd. Met een aanhangsel van 21 juli 2000 is deze arbeidsovereenkomst vanaf 1 augustus 2000 omgezet in een voltijdse overeenkomst voor onbepaalde tijd.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"is op 22 november 1999 in dienst getreden van Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999";
  "is op 22 november 1999 in dienst getreden van Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "is op 22 november 1999 in dienst getreden van Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999"->"voltijdse arbeidsovereenkomst voor bepaalde tijd"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"aanhangsel 21/07/2000";
  "aanhangsel 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "aanhangsel 21/07/2000"->"1 augustus 2000 omgezet in een voltijdse overeenkomst voor onbepaalde tijd. 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 22 listopada 1999 r. RE została zatrudniona przez spółkę Materials Research Corporation, obecnie spółkę Praxair MRC, na stanowisku asystentki handlowej, na podstawie umowy o pracę na czas określony, w pełnym wymiarze czasu pracy. Aneksem z dnia 21 lipca 2000 r. ta umowa o pracę została z dniem 1 sierpnia 2000 r. przekształcona w umowę na czas nieokreślony, w pełnym wymiarze czasu pracy.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"W dniu 22 listopada 1999 r. RE została zatrudniona przez spółkę Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999";
  "W dniu 22 listopada 1999 r. RE została zatrudniona przez spółkę Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "W dniu 22 listopada 1999 r. RE została zatrudniona przez spółkę Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999"->"umowy o pracę na czas określony, w pełnym wymiarze czasu pracy"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Aneksem 21/07/2000";
  "Aneksem 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "Aneksem 21/07/2000"->"na czas nieokreślony, w pełnym wymiarze czasu pracy z dniem 1 sierpnia 2000 r. 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 22 de novembro de 1999, RE foi contratada pela Materials Research Corporation, atual Praxair MRC, na qualidade de assistente comercial, no âmbito de um contrato de trabalho a termo e a tempo inteiro. Através de um aditamento de 21 de julho de 2000, esse contrato de trabalho foi convertido num contrato a tempo inteiro por tempo indeterminado, a partir de 1 de agosto de 2000.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Em 22 de novembro de 1999, RE foi contratada pela Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999";
  "Em 22 de novembro de 1999, RE foi contratada pela Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "Em 22 de novembro de 1999, RE foi contratada pela Materials Research Corporation 22/11/1999"->"contrato de trabalho a termo e a tempo inteiro"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"aditamento 21/07/2000";
  "aditamento 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "aditamento 21/07/2000"->"contrato a tempo inteiro por tempo indeterminado, a partir de 1 de agosto de 2000. 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 22 noiembrie 1999, RE a fost angajată de Materials Research Corporation, devenită Praxair MRC, în calitate de asistent comercial, în cadrul unui contract de muncă pe perioadă determinată și cu normă întreagă. Printr‑un act adițional din 21 iulie 2000, acest contract de muncă a fost transformat într‑un contract cu normă întreagă pe durată nedeterminată începând cu 1 august 2000.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"La 22 noiembrie 1999, RE a fost angajată de Materials Research Corporation, devenită Praxair MRC, în calitate de asistent comercial, în cadrul unui contract de muncă pe perioadă determinată și cu normă întreagă. 22/11/1999";
  "La 22 noiembrie 1999, RE a fost angajată de Materials Research Corporation, devenită Praxair MRC, în calitate de asistent comercial, în cadrul unui contract de muncă pe perioadă determinată și cu normă întreagă. 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "La 22 noiembrie 1999, RE a fost angajată de Materials Research Corporation, devenită Praxair MRC, în calitate de asistent comercial, în cadrul unui contract de muncă pe perioadă determinată și cu normă întreagă. 22/11/1999"->"contract de muncă pe perioadă determinată și cu normă întreagă"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"act adițional 21/07/2000";
  "act adițional 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "act adițional 21/07/2000"->"1 august 2000. 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 22. novembra 1999 bola RE zamestnaná v spoločnosti Materials Research Corporation, neskôr Praxair MRC, ako obchodná asistentka na základe pracovnej zmluvy na dobu určitú a na plný úväzok. Dodatkom k zmluve z 21. júla 2000 bola jej pracovná zmluva zmenená na zmluvu na dobu neurčitú na plný úväzok s účinnosťou od 1. augusta 2000.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Dňa 22. novembra 1999 bola RE zamestnaná v spoločnosti Materials Research Corporation, neskôr Praxair MRC, ako obchodná asistentka na základe pracovnej zmluvy na dobu určitú a na plný úväzok. 22/11/1999";
  "Dňa 22. novembra 1999 bola RE zamestnaná v spoločnosti Materials Research Corporation, neskôr Praxair MRC, ako obchodná asistentka na základe pracovnej zmluvy na dobu určitú a na plný úväzok. 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "Dňa 22. novembra 1999 bola RE zamestnaná v spoločnosti Materials Research Corporation, neskôr Praxair MRC, ako obchodná asistentka na základe pracovnej zmluvy na dobu určitú a na plný úväzok. 22/11/1999"->"pracovnej zmluvy na dobu určitú a na plný úväzok"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Attendum 21/07/2000";
  "Attendum 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "Attendum 21/07/2000"->"zmluvu na dobu neurčitú na plný úväzok s účinnosťou od 1. augusta 2000. 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Družba Materials Research Corporation, ki je postala družba Praxair MRC, je RE 22. novembra 1999 zaposlila s pogodbo o zaposlitvi za določen čas s polnim delovnim časom na delovno mesto trgovinske pomočnice. Z aneksom z dne 21. julija 2000 je bila ta pogodba s 1. avgustom 2000 spremenjena v pogodbo o zaposlitvi za nedoločen čas s polnim delovnim časom.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"22. novembra 1999 zaposlila s pogodbo o zaposlitvi za določen čas s polnim delovnim časom na delovno mesto trgovinske pomočnice. 22/11/1999";
  "22. novembra 1999 zaposlila s pogodbo o zaposlitvi za določen čas s polnim delovnim časom na delovno mesto trgovinske pomočnice. 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "22. novembra 1999 zaposlila s pogodbo o zaposlitvi za določen čas s polnim delovnim časom na delovno mesto trgovinske pomočnice. 22/11/1999"->"pogodbo o zaposlitvi za določen čas s polnim delovnim časom"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"aneksom 21/07/2000";
  "aneksom 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "aneksom 21/07/2000"->"1. avgustom 2000 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Materials Research Corporation, josta on tullut Praxair MRC, otti RE:n palvelukseensa 22.11.1999 kaupalliseksi avustajaksi määräaikaisella ja täysipäiväisellä työsopimuksella. Työsuhde muutettiin 1.8.2000 lähtien täysipäiväiseksi toistaiseksi voimassa olevaksi 21.7.2000 tehdyllä lisäsopimuksella.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"otti RE:n palvelukseensa 22.11.1999 22/11/1999";
  "otti RE:n palvelukseensa 22.11.1999 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "otti RE:n palvelukseensa 22.11.1999 22/11/1999"->"määräaikaisella ja täysipäiväisellä työsopimuksella"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Attendum 21/07/2000";
  "Attendum 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "Attendum 21/07/2000"->"1.8.2000 lähtien täysipäiväiseksi toistaiseksi voimassa olevaksi 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

Den 22 november 1999 anställdes RE genom ett avtal om visstidsanställning på heltid som säljassistent av Materials Research Corporation, numera Praxair MRC. Genom ett tilläggsavtal av den 21 juli 2000 omvandlades detta anställningsavtal till ett avtal om tillsvidareanställning på heltid, från och med den 1 augusti 2000.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Den 22 november 1999 anställdes RE genom ett avtal om visstidsanställning på heltid som säljassistent av Materials Research Corporation, numera Praxair MRC. 22/11/1999";
  "Den 22 november 1999 anställdes RE genom ett avtal om visstidsanställning på heltid som säljassistent av Materials Research Corporation, numera Praxair MRC. 22/11/1999"->"RE";
  "Den 22 november 1999 anställdes RE genom ett avtal om visstidsanställning på heltid som säljassistent av Materials Research Corporation, numera Praxair MRC. 22/11/1999"->"avtal om visstidsanställning på heltid"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"tilläggsavtal 21/07/2000";
  "tilläggsavtal 21/07/2000"->"RE";
  "tilläggsavtal 21/07/2000"->"tillsvidareanställning på heltid, från och med den 1 augusti 2000. 01/08/2000"[dir=none];
  "Materials Research Corporation"->"Praxair MRC";
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: English

RE took a first period of maternity leave from 4 February 2001 to 19 August 2001, followed by a period of childcare leave from 6 September 2001 to 6 September 2003. She then took a second period of maternity leave from 6 November 2007 to 6 June 2008, followed by a period of childcare leave from 1 August 2008, in the form of her working hours being reduced by one fifth. That last period of childcare leave was supposed to end on 29 January 2011.
On 6 December 2010, RE was made redundant as part of a collective redundancy on economic grounds. She accepted redeployment leave for a period of 9 months.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
   "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Redundant as part of a collective redundancy on economic grounds 06/12/2010"];
   "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Accepted redeployment leave 9 month"];
   "RE"->"Took maternity leave and childcare leave for a long period"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

RE ползва първо отпуск по майчинство от 4 февруари до 19 август 2001 г., а след това и отпуск за отглеждане на дете от 6 септември 2001 г. до 6 септември 2003 г. По-късно тя ползва втори отпуск по майчинство от 6 ноември 2007 г. до 6 юни 2008 г., а след това, считано от 1 август 2008 г., и отпуск за отглеждане на дете под формата на намалено с една пета работно време. Последният отпуск е трябвало да приключи на 29 януари 2011 г.
На 6 декември 2010 г. RE е уволнена при колективни уволнения по икономически причини. Тя приема да ползва отпуск за преквалификация с продължителност от девет месеца.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="уволнена при колективни уволнения по икономически причини 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="приема да ползва отпуск за преквалификация с продължителност от девет месеца."];
  "RE"->"RE ползва първо отпуск по майчинство от 4 февруари до 19 август 2001 г., а след това и отпуск за отглеждане на дете от 6 септември 2001 г. до 6 септември 2003 г. По-късно тя ползва втори отпуск по майчинство от 6 ноември 2007 г. до 6 юни 2008 г., а след това, считано от 1 август 2008 г., и отпуск за отглеждане на дете под формата на намалено с една пета работно време."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

RE disfrutó de un primer permiso de maternidad durante el período comprendido entre el 4 de febrero y el 19 de agosto de 2001, seguido de un permiso parental por cuidado de hijos desde el 6 de septiembre de 2001 al 6 de septiembre de 2003. Posteriormente disfrutó de un segundo permiso de maternidad durante el período comprendido entre el 6 de noviembre de 2007 y el 6 de junio de 2008, seguido de un permiso parental por cuidado de hijos, a partir del 1 de agosto de 2008, en forma de reducción en una quinta parte de su jornada laboral. Este último permiso debía finalizar el 29 de enero de 2011.
El 6 de diciembre de 2010, RE fue despedida en el marco de un procedimiento de despido colectivo por causas económicas. Aceptó un permiso de recolocación de nueve meses de duración.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Despedida en el marco de un procedimiento de despido colectivo por causas económicas. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Aceptó un permiso de recolocación de nueve meses de duración."];
  "RE"->"RE disfrutó de un primer permiso de maternidad durante el período comprendido entre el 4 de febrero y el 19 de agosto de 2001, seguido de un permiso parental por cuidado de hijos desde el 6 de septiembre de 2001 al 6 de septiembre de 2003. Posteriormente disfrutó de un segundo permiso de maternidad durante el período comprendido entre el 6 de noviembre de 2007 y el 6 de junio de 2008, seguido de un permiso parental por cuidado de hijos, a partir del 1 de agosto de 2008, en forma de reducción en una quinta parte de su jornada laboral. Este último permiso debía finalizar el 29 de enero de 2011."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

RE čerpala od 4. února do 19. srpna 2001 první mateřskou dovolenou a od 6. září 2001 do 6. září 2003 rodičovskou dovolenou na výchovu dítěte. Následně čerpala od 6. listopadu 2007 do 6. června 2008 druhou mateřskou dovolenou, po níž od 1. srpna 2008 následovala rodičovská dovolená na výchovu dítěte, a to ve formě pracovního úvazku zkráceného o jednu pětinu. Posledně uvedená rodičovská dovolená měla být ukončena ke dni 29. ledna 2011.
Dne 6. prosince 2010 byla RE propuštěna v rámci hromadného propouštění z hospodářských důvodů. Souhlasila s rekvalifikačním volnem v délce devíti měsíců.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Byla RE propuštěna v rámci hromadného propouštění z hospodářských důvodů. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Souhlasila s rekvalifikačním volnem v délce devíti měsíců."];
  "RE"->"čerpala od 4. února do 19. srpna 2001 první mateřskou dovolenou a od 6. září 2001 do 6. září 2003 rodičovskou dovolenou na výchovu dítěte. Následně čerpala od 6. listopadu 2007 do 6. června 2008 druhou mateřskou dovolenou, po níž od 1. srpna 2008 následovala rodičovská dovolená na výchovu dítěte, a to ve formě pracovního úvazku zkráceného o jednu pětinu."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

RE holdt barselsorlov første gang i perioden fra den 4. februar til den 19. august 2001, efterfulgt af forældreorlov fra den 6. september 2001 til den 6. september 2003. Hun holdt herefter barselsorlov anden gang i perioden fra den 6. november 2007 til den 6. juni 2008, efterfulgt af forældreorlov fra den 1. august 2008 i form af nedsættelse af arbejdstiden med en femtedel. Denne sidstnævnte orlov skulle ophøre den 29. januar 2011.
Den 6. december 2010 blev RE afskediget af økonomiske grunde i forbindelse med en procedure om kollektiv afskedigelse. Hun accepterede en omskolingsorlov af en varighed på ni måneder.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="RE afskediget af økonomiske grunde i forbindelse med en procedure om kollektiv afskedigelse. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Hun accepterede en omskolingsorlov af en varighed på ni måneder."];
  "RE"->"RE holdt barselsorlov første gang i perioden fra den 4. februar til den 19. august 2001, efterfulgt af forældreorlov fra den 6. september 2001 til den 6. september 2003. Hun holdt herefter barselsorlov anden gang i perioden fra den 6. november 2007 til den 6. juni 2008, efterfulgt af forældreorlov fra den 1. august 2008 i form af nedsættelse af arbejdstiden med en femtedel. Denne sidstnævnte orlov skulle ophøre den 29. januar 2011."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: German

RE nahm einen ersten Mutterschaftsurlaub im Zeitraum vom 4. Februar bis zum 19. August 2001 in Anspruch, an den sich ein Erziehungsurlaub vom 6. September 2001 bis zum 6. September 2003 anschloss. Einen zweiten Mutterschaftsurlaub nahm sie im Zeitraum vom 6. November 2007 bis zum6. Juni 2008 in Anspruch, an den sich ab 1. August 2008 ein Erziehungsurlaub in Form einer Reduzierung ihrer Arbeitszeit um ein Fünftel anschloss. Dieser Erziehungsurlaub sollte am 29. Januar 2011 enden.
Am 6. Dezember 2010 wurde RE aus wirtschaftlichen Gründen im Rahmen einer Massenentlassung gekündigt. Sie erklärte sich mit einem neunmonatigen Wiedereingliederungsurlaub einverstanden.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="aus wirtschaftlichen Gründen im Rahmen einer Massenentlassung gekündigt 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Sie erklärte sich mit einem neunmonatigen Wiedereingliederungsurlaub einverstanden."];
  "RE"->"RE nahm einen ersten Mutterschaftsurlaub im Zeitraum vom 4. Februar bis zum 19. August 2001 in Anspruch, an den sich ein Erziehungsurlaub vom 6. September 2001 bis zum 6. September 2003 anschloss. Einen zweiten Mutterschaftsurlaub nahm sie im Zeitraum vom 6. November 2007 bis zum6. Juni 2008 in Anspruch, an den sich ab 1. August 2008 ein Erziehungsurlaub in Form einer Reduzierung ihrer Arbeitszeit um ein Fünftel anschloss."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

RE oli esimest korda rasedus- ja sünnituspuhkusel 4. veebruarist kuni 19. augustini 2001, millele järgnes lapsehoolduspuhkus 6. septembrist 2001 kuni 6. septembrini 2003. Seejärel läks RE teist korda rasedus- ja sünnituspuhkusele 6. novembrist 2007 kuni 6. juunini 2008, millele järgnes lapsehoolduspuhkus alates 1. augustist 2008, mis oli korraldatud tema tööaja viiendiku võrra vähendamise teel. Lapsehoolduspuhkus pidi lõppema 29. jaanuaril 2011.
RE koondati 6. detsembril 2010 majanduslikel põhjustel toimunud koondamise raames. Ta nõustus võtma üheksakuulise ümberpaigutamispuhkuse.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="RE koondati 6. detsembril 2010 majanduslikel põhjustel toimunud koondamise raames. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Ta nõustus võtma üheksakuulise ümberpaigutamispuhkuse."];
  "RE"->"RE oli esimest korda rasedus- ja sünnituspuhkusel 4. veebruarist kuni 19. augustini 2001, millele järgnes lapsehoolduspuhkus 6. septembrist 2001 kuni 6. septembrini 2003. Seejärel läks RE teist korda rasedus- ja sünnituspuhkusele 6. novembrist 2007 kuni 6. juunini 2008, millele järgnes lapsehoolduspuhkus alates 1. augustist 2008, mis oli korraldatud tema tööaja viiendiku võrra vähendamise teel. Lapsehoolduspuhkus pidi lõppema 29. jaanuaril 2011."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Η RE έλαβε αρχικώς άδεια μητρότητας από τις 4 Φεβρουαρίου 2001 έως τις 19 Αυγούστου 2001 και, κατόπιν, γονική άδεια ανατροφής τέκνου από τις 6 Σεπτεμβρίου 2001 έως τις 6 Σεπτεμβρίου 2003. Εν συνεχεία, έλαβε δεύτερη άδεια μητρότητας από τις 6 Νοεμβρίου 2007 έως τις 6 Ιουνίου 2008 και, κατόπιν, γονική άδεια ανατροφής τέκνου από την 1η Αυγούστου 2008, υπό μορφή μείωσης του χρόνου εργασίας κατά το ένα πέμπτο. Η άδεια αυτή επρόκειτο να λήξει στις 29 Ιανουαρίου 2011.
Στις 6 Δεκεμβρίου 2010, η RE απολύθηκε στο πλαίσιο διαδικασίας ομαδικών απολύσεων για οικονομικούς λόγους. Δέχθηκε να λάβει άδεια επανένταξης διάρκειας εννέα μηνών.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Η RE απολύθηκε στο πλαίσιο διαδικασίας ομαδικών απολύσεων για οικονομικούς λόγους. 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Δέχθηκε να λάβει άδεια επανένταξης διάρκειας εννέα μηνών."];
  "RE"->"Η RE έλαβε αρχικώς άδεια μητρότητας από τις 4 Φεβρουαρίου 2001 έως τις 19 Αυγούστου 2001 και, κατόπιν, γονική άδεια ανατροφής τέκνου από τις 6 Σεπτεμβρίου 2001 έως τις 6 Σεπτεμβρίου 2003. Εν συνεχεία, έλαβε δεύτερη άδεια μητρότητας από τις 6 Νοεμβρίου 2007 έως τις 6 Ιουνίου 2008 και, κατόπιν, γονική άδεια ανατροφής τέκνου από την 1η Αυγούστου 2008,"[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: French

RE a bénéficié d’un premier congé de maternité, pour la période allant du 4 février au 19 août 2001, suivi par un congé parental d’éducation, allant du 6 septembre 2001 au 6 septembre 2003. Elle a ensuite bénéficié d’un second congé de maternité, pour la période allant du 6 novembre 2007 au 6 juin 2008, suivi d’un congé parental d’éducation à compter du 1er août 2008, sous la forme d’une réduction d’un cinquième du temps de travail. Ce dernier congé devait se terminer le 29 janvier 2011.
Le 6 décembre 2010, RE a été licenciée dans le cadre d’une procédure de licenciement collectif pour motif économique. Elle a accepté un congé de reclassement d’une durée de neuf mois.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="Licenciée dans le cadre d'une procédure de licenciement collectif pour motif économique 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="Elle a accepté un congé de reclassement d’une durée de neuf mois."];
  "RE"->"RE a bénéficié d’un premier congé de maternité, pour la période allant du 4 février au 19 août 2001, suivi par un congé parental d’éducation, allant du 6 septembre 2001 au 6 septembre 2003. Elle a ensuite bénéficié d’un second congé de maternité, pour la période allant du 6 novembre 2007 au 6 juin 2008, suivi d’un congé parental d’éducation à compter du 1er août 2008, sous la forme d’une réduction d’un cinquième du temps de travail."[dir=none];
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
RE v Praxair MRC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.
Case C-486/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Osoba RE koristila je prvi rodiljni dopust od 4. veljače do 19. kolovoza 2001., a potom roditeljski dopust za odgoj djeteta od 6. rujna 2001. do 6. rujna 2003. Zatim je koristila drugi rodiljni dopust od 6. studenoga 2007. do 6. lipnja 2008. i potom roditeljski dopust za odgoj djeteta od 1. kolovoza 2008. u obliku radnog vremena skraćenog za jednu petinu. Taj posljednji dopust trebao je isteći 29. siječnja 2011.
Osoba RE je 6. prosinca 2010. u sklopu kolektivnog otkazivanja dobila poslovno uvjetovani otkaz te je prihvatila dopust radi prekvalifikacije u trajanju od devet mjeseci.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "RE"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Praxair MRC"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "Praxair MRC"->"RE"[label="6. prosinca 2010. u sklopu kolektivnog otkazivanja dobila poslovno uvjetovani otkaz 06/12/2010"];
  "RE"->"Praxair MRC"[label="prihvatila dopust radi prekvalifikacije u trajanju od devet mjeseci."];
  "RE"->"Osoba RE koristila je prvi rodiljni dopust od 4. veljače do 19. kolovoza 2001., a potom roditeljski dopust za odgoj djeteta od 6. rujna 2001. do 6. rujna 2003. Zatim je koristila drugi rodiljni dopust od 6. studenoga 2007. do 6. lipnja 2008. i potom roditeljski dopust za odgoj djeteta od 1. kolovoza 2008. u obliku radnog vremena skraćenog za jednu petinu. Taj posljednji dopust trebao je isteći 29. siječnja 2011."[dir=none];
}