mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Greek

Στη συνέχεια, ο ενδιαφερόμενος παραδόθηκε στις βελγικές αρχές και ετέθη υπό κράτηση. Η κράτηση αυτή στηριζόταν στην καταδίκη του στην κύρια ποινή, η λήξη της οποίας είχε καθορισθεί στις 12 Αυγούστου 2018, και στην παρεπόμενη ποινή, ήτοι τη θέση του ενδιαφερομένου στη διάθεση του αρμόδιου για την εκτέλεση ποινών δικαστηρίου για διάρκεια δέκα ετών.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "βελγικές αρχές"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "βελγικές αρχές"->"υπό κράτηση";
  "υπό κράτηση"->"IK";
  "υπό κράτηση"->"στην καταδίκη του στην κύρια ποινή, η λήξη της οποίας είχε καθορισθεί στις 12 Αυγούστου 2018, και στην παρεπόμενη ποινή, ήτοι τη θέση του ενδιαφερομένου στη διάθεση του αρμόδιου για την εκτέλεση ποινών δικαστηρίου για διάρκεια δέκα ετών.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: French

L’intéressé a ensuite été remis aux autorités belges et mis en détention. Cette détention était fondée sur sa condamnation à la peine principale, le terme de celle-ci ayant été fixé au 12 août 2018, ainsi qu’à la peine complémentaire, soit sa mise à disposition pour une durée de dix ans.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "aux autorités belges"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "aux autorités belges"->"mis en détention";
  "mis en détention"->"IK";
  "mis en détention"->"fondée sur sa condamnation à la peine principale, le terme de celle-ci ayant été fixé au 12 août 2018, ainsi qu’à la peine complémentaire, soit sa mise à disposition pour une durée de dix ans.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Croatian

Osoba o kojoj je riječ zatim je predana belgijskim tijelima te je smještena u pritvor. Taj se pritvor temeljio na osudi na glavnu kaznu, čiji je predviđeni istek bio 12. kolovoza 2018., kao i na dodatnu kaznu upućivanja u trajanju od deset godina.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "belgijskim tijelima"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "belgijskim tijelima"->"smještena u pritvor";
  "smještena u pritvor"->"IK";
  "smještena u pritvor"->"Temeljio na osudi na glavnu kaznu, čiji je predviđeni istek bio 12. kolovoza 2018., kao i na dodatnu kaznu upućivanja u trajanju od deset godina.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Italian

L’interessato è stato poi consegnato alle autorità belghe e posto in stato di detenzione. Tale detenzione era basata sulla sua condanna alla pena principale, la cui scadenza era stata fissata al 12 agosto 2018, nonché alla pena accessoria, ovvero la sua messa a disposizione per un periodo di dieci anni.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "alle autorità belghe"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "alle autorità belghe"->"posto in stato di detenzione";
  "posto in stato di detenzione"->"IK";
  "posto in stato di detenzione"->"Basata sulla sua condanna alla pena principale, la cui scadenza era stata fissata al 12 agosto 2018, nonché alla pena accessoria, ovvero la sua messa a disposizione per un periodo di dieci anni.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Latvian

Pēc tam ieinteresētā persona tika nodota Beļģijas iestādēm un ievietota apcietinājumā. Šis apcietinājums bija balstīts uz piespriesto pamatsodu, kura termiņš bija noteikts līdz 2018. gada 12. augustam, kā arī uz papildsodu – nodošanu Kriminālsodu izpildes tiesas uzraudzībā uz desmit gadiem.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Beļģijas iestādēm"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Beļģijas iestādēm"->"apcietinājumā";
  "apcietinājumā"->"IK";
  "apcietinājumā"->"Balstīts uz piespriesto pamatsodu, kura termiņš bija noteikts līdz 2018. gada 12. augustam, kā arī uz papildsodu – nodošanu Kriminālsodu izpildes tiesas uzraudzībā uz desmit gadiem.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Lithuanian

Tada atitinkamas asmuo buvo perduotas Belgijos institucijoms ir įkalintas. Šis įkalinimas buvo pagrįstas nuosprendžiu dėl pagrindinės bausmės (buvo nustatyta, kad jis pasibaigs 2018 m. rugpjūčio 12 d.) ir papildomos bausmės, t. y. bausmių skyrimo teismo diskrecijos dešimties metų laikotarpiu skirti papildomą bausmę.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Belgijos institucijoms"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Belgijos institucijoms"->"įkalintas";
  "įkalintas"->"IK";
  "įkalintas"->"Pagrįstas nuosprendžiu dėl pagrindinės bausmės (buvo nustatyta, kad jis pasibaigs 2018 m. rugpjūčio 12 d.) ir papildomos bausmės, t. y. bausmių skyrimo teismo diskrecijos dešimties metų laikotarpiu skirti papildomą bausmę.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Hungarian

Az érintettet ezt követően átadták a belga hatóságoknak, és őrizetbe vették. Ezen őrizet a főbüntetésen, amely leteltének időpontja 2018. augusztus 12., és a mellékbüntetésen, azaz a tíz év tartamú fogva tarthatónak nyilváníthatóságon alapult.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "a belga hatóságoknak"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "a belga hatóságoknak"->"őrizetbe vették";
  "őrizetbe vették"->"IK";
  "őrizetbe vették"->"Ezen őrizet a főbüntetésen, amely leteltének időpontja 2018. augusztus 12., és a mellékbüntetésen, azaz a tíz év tartamú fogva tarthatónak nyilváníthatóságon alapult.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Maltese

Sussegwentement il-persuna kkonċernata ġiet ikkonsenjata lill-awtoritajiet Belġjani u mqiegħda f’detenzjoni. Din id-detenzjoni kienet ibbażata fuq il-kundanna tagħha għall-piena prinċipali, li t-terminu tagħha ġie stabbilit għat-12 ta’ Awwissu 2018, kif ukoll għall-piena addizzjonali, jiġifieri t-tqegħid għad-dispożizzjoni tagħha għal perijodu ta’ għaxar snin.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "l-awtoritajiet Belġjani"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "l-awtoritajiet Belġjani"->"mqiegħda f’detenzjoni";
  "mqiegħda f’detenzjoni"->"IK";
  "mqiegħda f’detenzjoni"->"Ibbażata fuq il-kundanna prinċipali, li t-terminu tagħha ġie stabbilit għat-12 ta’ Awwissu 2018, kif ukoll għall-piena addizzjonali, jiġifieri t-tqegħid għad-dispożizzjoni tagħha għal perijodu ta’ għaxar snin.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Dutch

De betrokkene is vervolgens overgeleverd aan de Belgische autoriteiten en in detentie geplaatst. Deze detentie was gegrond op de veroordeling tot de hoofdstraf, waarvoor het strafeinde was bepaald op 12 augustus 2018, alsook op de veroordeling tot de bijkomende straf, te weten TBS voor een periode van tien jaar.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "de Belgische autoriteiten"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "de Belgische autoriteiten"->"in detentie geplaatst";
  "in detentie geplaatst"->"IK";
  "in detentie geplaatst"->"Gegrond op de veroordeling tot de hoofdstraf, waarvoor het strafeinde was bepaald op 12 augustus 2018, alsook op de veroordeling tot de bijkomende straf, te weten TBS voor een periode van tien jaar.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Polish

Zainteresowany został następnie przekazany organom belgijskim i umieszczony w zakładzie karnym. To umieszczenie w zakładzie karnym było oparte na skazaniu IK na karę zasadniczą, której zakończenie zostało określone na dzień 12 sierpnia 2018 r., a także na karę dodatkową polegającą na oddaniu do dyspozycji na okres dziesięciu lat.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "organom belgijskim"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "organom belgijskim"->"umieszczony w zakładzie karnym";
  "umieszczony w zakładzie karnym"->"IK";
  "umieszczony w zakładzie karnym"->"Oparte na skazaniu IK na karę zasadniczą, której zakończenie zostało określone na dzień 12 sierpnia 2018 r., a także na karę dodatkową polegającą na oddaniu do dyspozycji na okres dziesięciu lat.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Portuguese

Em seguida, o interessado foi entregue às autoridades belgas e colocado em detenção. Essa detenção era fundada na sua condenação na pena principal, cujo termo foi fixado em 12 de agosto de 2018, bem como na pena acessória, ou seja, a sua colocação à ordem do tribunal por um período de dez anos.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "às autoridades belgas"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "às autoridades belgas"->"colocado em detenção";
  "colocado em detenção"->"IK";
  "colocado em detenção"->"Fundada na sua condenação na pena principal, cujo termo foi fixado em 12 de agosto de 2018, bem como na pena acessória, ou seja, a sua colocação à ordem do tribunal por um período de dez anos.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Romanian

Ulterior, persoana interesată a fost predată autorităților belgiene și încarcerată. Această detenție era întemeiată pe condamnarea la pedeapsa principală, al cărei termen a fost stabilit la 12 august 2018, precum și pe pedeapsa complementară, respectiv punerea la dispoziție pentru o perioadă de 10 ani.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "autorităților belgiene"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "autorităților belgiene"->"încarcerată";
  "încarcerată"->"IK";
  "încarcerată"->"pe condamnarea la pedeapsa principală, al cărei termen a fost stabilit la 12 august 2018, precum și pe pedeapsa complementară, respectiv punerea la dispoziție pentru o perioadă de 10 ani.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Slovak

Dotknutá osoba bola následne odovzdaná belgickým orgánom a vzatá do väzby. Táto väzba vychádzala z jej odsúdenia na hlavný trest, ktorého koniec bol stanovený na 12. augusta 2018, ako aj na doplňujúci trest, ktorý spočíval v treste dohľadu v trvaní desať rokov.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "belgickým orgánom"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "belgickým orgánom"->"vzatá do väzby";
  "vzatá do väzby"->"IK";
  "vzatá do väzby"->"Táto väzba vychádzala z jej odsúdenia na hlavný trest, ktorého koniec bol stanovený na 12. augusta 2018, ako aj na doplňujúci trest, ktorý spočíval v treste dohľadu v trvaní desať rokov.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Slovenian

Zadevna oseba je bila nato predana belgijskim organom in zaprta. Ta zapor je temeljil na njeni obsodbi na glavno kazen, katere konec prestajanja je bil določen na 12. avgust 2018, in na dodatno kazen, to je na izročitev v obravnavo, za obdobje desetih let.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "belgijskim organom"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "belgijskim organom"->"zaprtа";
  "zaprtа"->"IK";
  "zaprtа"->"Temeljil na njeni obsodbi na glavno kazen, katere konec prestajanja je bil določen na 12. avgust 2018, in na dodatno kazen, to je na izročitev v obravnavo, za obdobje desetih let.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Finnish

Asianomainen luovutettiin tämän jälkeen Belgian viranomaisille ja vangittiin. Tämä vankeus perustui hänelle tuomittuun päärangaistukseen, jonka oli määrä päättyä 12.8.2018, sekä oheisseuraamukseen eli hänen kymmeneksi vuodeksi valvontaan määräämiseensä.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Belgian viranomaisille"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "Belgian viranomaisille"->"vangittiin";
  "vangittiin"->"IK";
  "vangittiin"->"perustui hänelle tuomittuun päärangaistukseen, jonka oli määrä päättyä 12.8.2018, sekä oheisseuraamukseen eli hänen kymmeneksi vuodeksi valvontaan määräämiseensä.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Swedish

IK överlämnades därefter till de belgiska myndigheterna och frihetsberövades. Det frihetsberövandet grundade sig på att han ådömts det huvudsakliga straffet, som skulle vara avtjänat den 12 augusti 2018, plus den kompletterande påföljden, det vill säga att han skulle stå till domstols förfogande och vara underkastad övervakning under tio år.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "de belgiska myndigheterna"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "de belgiska myndigheterna"->"frihetsberövades";
  "frihetsberövades"->"IK";
  "frihetsberövades"->"Det frihetsberövandet grundade sig på att han ådömts det huvudsakliga straffet, som skulle vara avtjänat den 12 augusti 2018, plus den kompletterande påföljden, det vill säga att han skulle stå till domstols förfogande och vara underkastad övervakning under tio år.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: English

On 21 June and 19 July 2018, the strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Court for the enforcement of custodial sentences, Antwerp, Belgium) sentenced IK to conditional release at its disposal. In those proceedings, IK claimed that it was not lawful for the surrender by Dutch authorities to be based on the additional sentence and that the court could not order deprivation of liberty pursuant to that sentence given that the European arrest warrant issued by the Belgian authorities did not mention it.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Court for the enforcement of custodial sentences, Antwerp, Belgium)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

   "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Court for the enforcement of custodial sentences, Antwerp, Belgium)"->"Order 21/06/2018, 19/07/2018";
   "Order 21/06/2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
   "Order 21/06/2018, 19/07/2018"->"Conditional release of IK"[dir=none];
   "Conditional release of IK"->"It was not lawful for the surrender by Dutch authorities to be based on the additional sentence and that the court could not order deprivation of liberty pursuant to that sentence given that the European arrest warrant issued by the Belgian authorities did not mention it."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Bulgarian

На 21 юни и на 19 юли 2018 г. strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (съдът по изпълнението на наказанията Антверпен, Белгия) се произнася по оставянето на разположение на IK. В това производство IK поддържа, че предаването от нидерландските органи няма как да се отнася до допълващото наказание и че посоченият съд не може да постанови лишаване от свобода в изпълнение на това наказание, тъй като европейската заповед за арест, издадена от белгийските органи, не го упоменава.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen съдът по изпълнението на наказанията Антверпен, Белгия"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen съдът по изпълнението на наказанията Антверпен, Белгия"->"21 юни 2018 г., 19/07/2018";
  "21 юни 2018 г., 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21 юни 2018 г., 19/07/2018"->"оставянето на разположение на IK"[dir=none];
  "оставянето на разположение на IK"->"предаването от нидерландските органи няма как да се отнася до допълващото наказание и че посоченият съд не може да постанови лишаване от свобода в изпълнение на това наказание, тъй като европейската заповед за арест, издадена от белгийските органи, не го упоменава.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Spanish

Los días 21 de junio y 19 de julio de 2018, el strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de Vigilancia Penitenciaria de Amberes, Bélgica) resolvió sobre la puesta a disposición de IK. En este procedimiento, el interesado alegó que la entrega por las autoridades neerlandesas no podía referirse a la pena accesoria y que ese órgano jurisdiccional no podía ordenar una privación de libertad en ejecución de dicha pena, dado que la orden de detención europea emitida por las autoridades belgas no la mencionaba.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Tribunal de Vigilancia Penitenciaria de Amberes, Bélgica"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Tribunal de Vigilancia Penitenciaria de Amberes, Bélgica"->"Los días 21 de junio, 19/07/2018";
  "Los días 21 de junio, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Los días 21 de junio, 19/07/2018"->"la puesta a disposición de IK"[dir=none];
  "la puesta a disposición de IK"->"La entrega por las autoridades neerlandesas no podía referirse a la pena accesoria y que ese órgano jurisdiccional no podía ordenar una privación de libertad en ejecución de dicha pena, dado que la orden de detención europea emitida por las autoridades belgas no la mencionaba.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Czech

Dne 21. června a 19. července 2018 rozhodl strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (soud pro výkon trestů v Antverpách, Belgie) o podřízení IK jeho moci. V průběhu tohoto řízení IK tvrdil, že se předání ze strany nizozemských orgánů nemůže vztahovat k doplňkovému trestu a že tento soud nemůže za účelem výkonu tohoto trestu nařídit zbavení osobní svobody, neboť evropský zatýkací rozkaz vydaný belgickými orgány se o něm nezmiňuje.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (soud pro výkon trestů v Antverpách, Belgie)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (soud pro výkon trestů v Antverpách, Belgie)"->"Dne 21. června 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "Dne 21. června 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Dne 21. června 2018, 19/07/2018"->"Podmíněné uvolnění IK"[dir=none];
  "Podmíněné uvolnění IK"->"Předání ze strany nizozemských orgánů nemůže vztahovat k doplňkovému trestu a tento soud nemůže za účelem výkonu tohoto trestu nařídit zbavení osobní svobody, neboť evropský zatýkací rozkaz vydaný belgickými orgány se o něm nezmiňuje.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Danish

Den 21. juni og den 19. juli 2018 traf strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (retten i sager vedrørende strafafsoning i Antwerpen, Belgien) afgørelse vedrørende tilsynet med IK. Under denne sag gjorde IK gældende, at den af de nederlandske myndigheder gennemførte overgivelse ikke kunne vedrøre tillægsstraffen, og at retten ikke kunne træffe bestemmelse om frihedsberøvelse med henblik på fuldbyrdelse af denne straf, eftersom den ikke var angivet i den europæiske arrestordre, som de belgiske myndigheder havde udstedt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen retten i sager vedrørende strafafsoning i Antwerpen, Belgien"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen retten i sager vedrørende strafafsoning i Antwerpen, Belgien"->"21. juni 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "21. juni 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21. juni 2018, 19/07/2018"->"Betinget frigivelse af IK"[dir=none];
  "Betinget frigivelse af IK"->"Den af de nederlandske myndigheder gennemførte overgivelse ikke kunne vedrøre tillægsstraffen, og at retten ikke kunne træffe bestemmelse om frihedsberøvelse med henblik på fuldbyrdelse af denne straf, eftersom den ikke var angivet i den europæiske arrestordre, som de belgiske myndigheder havde udstedt.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: German

Am 21. Juni und 19. Juli 2018 verhandelte die Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Strafvollstreckungsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien) in der Sache der Überantwortung von IK an das Strafvollstreckungsgericht. IK machte in diesem Verfahren geltend, dass sich die Übergabe durch die niederländischen Behörden nicht auf die zusätzliche Strafe habe beziehen können und die Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Strafvollstreckungsgericht) keinen Freiheitsentzug zur Vollstreckung dieser Strafe anordnen dürfe, da in dem von den belgischen Behörden ausgestellten Europäischen Haftbefehl von der zusätzlichen Strafe keine Rede sei.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Strafvollstreckungsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Strafvollstreckungsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien)"->"21. Juni 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "21. Juni 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21. Juni 2018, 19/07/2018"->"Bedingte Freigabe von IK"[dir=none];
  "Bedingte Freigabe von IK"->"IK machte in diesem Verfahren geltend, dass sich die Übergabe durch die niederländischen Behörden nicht auf die zusätzliche Strafe habe beziehen können und die Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Strafvollstreckungsgericht) keinen Freiheitsentzug zur Vollstreckung dieser Strafe anordnen dürfe, da in dem von den belgischen Behörden ausgestellten Europäischen Haftbefehl von der zusätzlichen Strafe keine Rede sei.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Estonian

Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpeni täitmiskohus) tegi 21. juunil ja 19. juulil 2018 otsuse IK järelevalve alla andmise kohta. Selles menetluses väitis asjasse puutuv isik sisuliselt, et üleandmine Madalmaade ametiasutuste poolt ei saa hõlmata lisakaristust ning et eespool nimetatud kohus ei saanud määrata selle karistuse täideviimist vabaduse võtmise teel, sest Belgia ametiasutuste tehtud Euroopa vahistamismääruses ei olnud seda nimetatud.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Antwerpeni täitmiskohus"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Antwerpeni täitmiskohus"->"21. juunil 2018 otsuse, 19/07/2018";
  "21. juunil 2018 otsuse, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21. juunil 2018 otsuse, 19/07/2018"->"IK järelevalve alla andmise kohta"[dir=none];
  "IK järelevalve alla andmise kohta"->"Üleandmine Madalmaade ametiasutuste poolt ei saa hõlmata lisakaristust ning et eespool nimetatud kohus ei saanud määrata selle karistuse täideviimist vabaduse võtmise teel, sest Belgia ametiasutuste tehtud Euroopa vahistamismääruses ei olnud seda nimetatud.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Greek

Στις 21 Ιουνίου και στις 19 Ιουλίου 2018, το strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο) αποφάνθηκε επί της θέσεως του ΙΚ στη διάθεση του εν λόγω δικαστηρίου. Κατά τη διαδικασία αυτή, ο ενδιαφερόμενος ισχυρίστηκε ότι η παράδοση από τις ολλανδικές αρχές δεν αφορούσε την παρεπόμενη ποινή και ότι το strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας) δεν μπορούσε να επιβάλει στέρηση της ελευθερίας προς εκτέλεση της εν λόγω ποινής, δεδομένου ότι η ποινή αυτή δεν αναγραφόταν στο εκδοθέν από τις βελγικές αρχές ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα σύλληψης.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο)"->"21 Ιουνίου 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "21 Ιουνίου 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21 Ιουνίου 2018, 19/07/2018"->"Απελευθέρωση υπό όρους του IK"[dir=none];
  "Απελευθέρωση υπό όρους του IK"->"Η παράδοση από τις ολλανδικές αρχές δεν αφορούσε την παρεπόμενη ποινή και ότι το strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας) δεν μπορούσε να επιβάλει στέρηση της ελευθερίας προς εκτέλεση της εν λόγω ποινής, δεδομένου ότι η ποινή αυτή δεν αναγραφόταν στο εκδοθέν από τις βελγικές αρχές ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα σύλληψης.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: French

Les 21 juin et 19 juillet 2018, le strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal de l’application des peines d’Anvers, Belgique) a statué sur la mise à disposition d’IK. Lors de cette procédure, l’intéressé a fait valoir que la remise par les autorités néerlandaises ne pouvait pas porter sur la peine complémentaire et que cette juridiction ne pouvait pas ordonner une privation de liberté en exécution de cette peine, étant donné que le mandat d’arrêt européen émis par les autorités belges ne la mentionnait pas.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal de l’application des peines d’Anvers, Belgique)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal de l’application des peines d’Anvers, Belgique)"->"Les 21 juin, 19/07/2018";
  "Les 21 juin, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Les 21 juin, 19/07/2018"->"mise à disposition d’IK"[dir=none];
  "mise à disposition d’IK"->"La remise par les autorités néerlandaises ne pouvait pas porter sur la peine complémentaire et que cette juridiction ne pouvait pas ordonner une privation de liberté en exécution de cette peine, étant donné que le mandat d’arrêt européen émis par les autorités belges ne la mentionnait pas.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Croatian

Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Sud izvršenja kazne, Antwerpen) odlučivao je 21. lipnja i 19. srpnja 2018. o upućivanju osobe IK. Tijekom tog postupka osoba o kojoj je riječ istaknula je da se predaja nizozemskih tijela ne može odnositi na dodatnu kaznu i da taj sud ne može odrediti oduzimanje slobode radi izvršenja te kazne s obzirom na to da ona nije navedena u europskom uhidbenom nalogu koji su izdala belgijska tijela.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Sud izvršenja kazne, Antwerpen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Sud izvršenja kazne, Antwerpen"->"21. lipnja 2018., 19/07/2018";
  "21. lipnja 2018., 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21. lipnja 2018., 19/07/2018"->"The text provided doesn't contain the Croatian equivalent of the phrase"Conditional release of IK"."[dir=none];
  "The text provided doesn't contain the Croatian equivalent of the phrase"Conditional release of IK"."->"Predaja nizozemskih tijela ne može se odnositi na dodatnu kaznu i taj sud ne može odrediti oduzimanje slobode radi izvršenja te kazne s obzirom na to da ona nije navedena u europskom uhidbenom nalogu koji su izdala belgijska tijela.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Italian

Il 21 giugno e il 19 luglio 2018, lo strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale dell’esecuzione penale di Anversa, Belgio) ha statuito sulla messa a disposizione di IK. Durante tale procedimento, l’interessato ha fatto valere che la consegna da parte delle autorità dei Paesi Bassi non poteva riguardare la pena accessoria e che tale giudice non poteva disporre la privazione della libertà in esecuzione di tale pena posto che il mandato di arresto europeo emesso dalle autorità belghe non ne faceva menzione.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale dell’esecuzione penale di Anversa, Belgio)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunale dell’esecuzione penale di Anversa, Belgio)"->"Il 21 giugno, 19/07/2018";
  "Il 21 giugno, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Il 21 giugno, 19/07/2018"->"messa a disposizione di IK"[dir=none];
  "messa a disposizione di IK"->"l’interessato ha fatto valere che la consegna da parte delle autorità dei Paesi Bassi non poteva riguardare la pena accessoria e che tale giudice non poteva disporre la privazione della libertà in esecuzione di tale pena posto che il mandato di arresto europeo emesso dalle autorità belghe non ne faceva menzione.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Latvian

2018. gada 21. jūnijā un 19. jūlijā strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpenes Kriminālsodu izpildes tiesa, Beļģija) lēma par IK nodošanu kriminālsodu izpildes tiesas rīcībā. Šajā procedūrā ieinteresētā persona apgalvoja, ka Nīderlandes iestāžu atļautā nodošana nevarēja attiekties uz papildsodu un ka šī tiesa nevarēja piespriest brīvības atņemšanu, izpildot šo sodu, jo Eiropas apcietināšanas orderī, ko bija izdevušas Beļģijas iestādes, tas nebija minēts.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Antverpenes Kriminālsodu izpildes tiesa, Beļģija"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Antverpenes Kriminālsodu izpildes tiesa, Beļģija"->"2018. gada 21. jūnijā, 19/07/2018";
  "2018. gada 21. jūnijā, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "2018. gada 21. jūnijā, 19/07/2018"->"IK nodošanu kriminālsodu izpildes tiesas rīcībā"[dir=none];
  "IK nodošanu kriminālsodu izpildes tiesas rīcībā"->"Nīderlandes iestāžu atļautā nodošana nevarēja attiekties uz papildsodu un ka šī tiesa nevarēja piespriest brīvības atņemšanu, izpildot šo sodu, jo Eiropas apcietināšanas orderī, ko bija izdevušas Beļģijas iestādes, tas nebija minēts.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Lithuanian

2018 m. birželio 21 d. ir liepos 19 d.strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (Antverpeno bausmių skyrimo teismas, Belgija) sprendė dėl papildomos bausmės IK skyrimo. Vykstant šiam procesui, suinteresuotasis asmuo teigė, kad Nyderlandų institucijos negalėjo jo perduoti, kad jam būtų vykdoma papildoma bausmė, ir kad tas teismas, vykdydamas šią bausmę, negalėjo nuspręsti taikyti laisvės atėmimo bausmės, nes Belgijos institucijų išduotame Europos arešto orderyje to nebuvo nurodyta.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpeno bausmių skyrimo teismas, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antverpeno bausmių skyrimo teismas, Belgija)"->"2018 m. birželio 21 d., 19/07/2018";
  "2018 m. birželio 21 d., 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "2018 m. birželio 21 d., 19/07/2018"->"Sąlyginis IK paleidimas"[dir=none];
  "Sąlyginis IK paleidimas"->"Nyderlandų institucijos negalėjo jo perduoti, kad jam būtų vykdoma papildoma bausmė, ir kad tas teismas, vykdydamas šią bausmę, negalėjo nuspręsti taikyti laisvės atėmimo bausmės, nes Belgijos institucijų išduotame Europos arešto orderyje to nebuvo nurodyta.."[dir=none];
    
}