mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Ved dom af 20. oktober 2017 forkastede Court of Appeal (appeldomstol, Irland) PF’s appel af dommen fra High Court (ret i første instans) og bekræftede, at Litauens øverste anklager er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i denne bestemmelse.
Den forelæggende ret, Supreme Court (øverste domstol, Irland), gav tilladelse til iværksættelse af appel af dommen afsagt af Court of Appeal (appeldomstol).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of appel (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of appel (Irland)"->"PF"[label="Ved dom af 20. oktober 2017 forkastede"];
  "PF"->"Court of appel (Irland)"[label="appel"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="gav tilladelse til iværksættelse af appel af dommen afsagt af Court of appel 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="appel"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: German

Mit Urteil vom 20. Oktober 2017 wies der Court of Appeal (Berufungsgerichtshof, Irland) das Rechtsmittel von PF gegen das Urteil des High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) zurück und bestätigte, dass der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen eine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne der genannten Bestimmung sei.
Das vorlegende Gericht – der Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof, Irland) – ließ die Einlegung eines Rechtsmittels gegen das Urteil des Court of Appeal (Berufungsgerichtshof) zu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Irland)"->"PF"[label="Mit Urteil vom 20. Oktober 2017 wies der Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Berufungsgerichtshof, Irland) das Rechtsmittel von PF gegen das Urteil des High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) zurück"];
  "PF"->"Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Irland)"[label="Berufungsgerichtshof"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="ließ die Einlegung eines Rechtsmittels gegen das Urteil des Court of Berufungsgerichtshof (Berufungsgerichtshof) zu. 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Berufungsgerichtshof"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

Court of Appeal (apellatsioonikohus, Iirimaa) jättis 20. oktoobri 2017. aasta otsusega rahuldamata kaebuse, mille PF oli esitanud High Courti (kõrge kohus) otsuse peale, ning kinnitas, et Leedu peaprokurör on „õigusasutus“ selle sätte tähenduses.
Eelotsusetaotluse esitanud Supreme Court (Iirimaa kõrgeim kohus) andis loa esitada Court of Appeali (apellatsioonikohus) otsuse peale kassatsioonkaebus.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of apellatsioonikohus (Iirimaa)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of apellatsioonikohus (Iirimaa)"->"PF"[label="jättis 20. oktoobri 2017. aasta otsusega rahuldamata"];
  "PF"->"Court of apellatsioonikohus (Iirimaa)"[label="apellatsioonikohus"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="andas loa esitada Court of Appeali (apellatsioonikohus) otsuse peale kassatsioonkaebus. 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="apellatsioonikohus"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Με απόφαση της 20ής Οκτωβρίου 2017, το Court of Appeal (εφετείο, Ιρλανδία) απέρριψε την έφεση του PF κατά της αποφάσεως του High Court (ανώτερου δικαστηρίου) και επιβεβαίωσε ότι ο γενικός εισαγγελέας της Λιθουανίας αποτελεί «δικαστική αρχή» κατά την έννοια της διατάξεως αυτής.
Το αιτούν δικαστήριο, Supreme Court (Ανώτατο Δικαστήριο, Ιρλανδία), επέτρεψε την άσκηση αναιρέσεως κατά της αποφάσεως του Court of Appeal (εφετείου).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of εφετείο (Ιρλανδία)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of εφετείο (Ιρλανδία)"->"PF"[label="Με απόφαση της 20ής Οκτωβρίου 2017"];
  "PF"->"Court of εφετείο (Ιρλανδία)"[label="εφετείο"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="επέτρεψε την άσκηση αναιρέσεως κατά της αποφάσεως του Court of εφετείο (εφετείου) 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="εφετείο"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: French

Par un arrêt du 20 octobre 2017, la Court of Appeal (Cour d’appel, Irlande) a rejeté le recours de PF contre le jugement de la High Court (Haute Cour) et a confirmé que le procureur général de Lituanie est une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de cette disposition.
La juridiction de renvoi, la Supreme Court (Cour suprême, Irlande), a autorisé l’introduction d’un recours contre l’arrêt de la Court of Appeal (Cour d’appel).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Cour d’appel (Irlande)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Cour d’appel (Irlande)"->"PF"[label="Par un arrêt du 20 octobre 2017"];
  "PF"->"Court of Cour d’appel (Irlande)"[label="Cour d’appel"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="a autorisé l’introduction d’un recours contre l’arrêt de la Court of Cour d’appel (Cour d’appel) 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Cour d’appel"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Court of Appeal (Žalbeni sud, Irska) presudom od 20. listopada 2017. odbio je žalbu osobe PF protiv presude High Courta (Visoki sud) te je potvrdio da je Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve „pravosudno tijelo” u smislu te odredbe.
Supreme Court (Vrhovni sud, Irska), odnosno sud koji je uputio zahtjev, odobrio je podnošenje revizije protiv presude Court of Appeala (Žalbeni sud).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Žalbeni sud (Irska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Žalbeni sud (Irska)"->"PF"[label="presudom od 20. listopada 2017. odbio je"];
  "PF"->"Court of Žalbeni sud (Irska)"[label="Žalbeni sud"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="odobrio je podnošenje revizije protiv presude Court of Appeala (Žalbeni sud) 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Žalbeni sud"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Con sentenza del 20 ottobre 2017, la Court of Appeal (Corte d’appello, Irlanda) ha respinto il ricorso di PF avverso la sentenza della High Court (Alta Corte) e ha confermato che il procuratore generale di Lituania è un’«autorità giudiziaria» ai sensi della suddetta disposizione.
La Supreme Court (Corte suprema, Irlanda), giudice del rinvio, ha autorizzato la presentazione di un ricorso avverso la sentenza della Court of Appeal (Corte d’appello).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Corte d’appello (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Corte d’appello (Irlanda)"->"PF"[label="Con sentenza del 20 ottobre 2017, la Court of Corte d’appello (Corte d’appello, Irlanda) ha respinto il ricorso di PF avverso la sentenza della High Court (Alta Corte)"];
  "PF"->"Court of Corte d’appello (Irlanda)"[label="Corte d’appello"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="ha autorizzato la presentazione di un ricorso avverso la sentenza della Court of Corte d’appello (Corte d’appello) 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Corte d’appello"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

Ar 2017. gada 20. oktobra spriedumu Court of Appeal (Apelācijas tiesa, Īrija) noraidīja PF apelācijas sūdzību par High Court (Augstā tiesa) spriedumu un apstiprināja, ka Lietuvas ģenerālprokurors ir “tiesu iestāde” minētās tiesību normas izpratnē.
Iesniedzējtiesa, Supreme Court (Augstākā tiesa, Īrija), atļāva pārsūdzēt Court of Appeal (Apelācijas tiesa) spriedumu.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Apelācijas (Īrija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Apelācijas (Īrija)"->"PF"[label="noraidīja"];
  "PF"->"Court of Apelācijas (Īrija)"[label="Apelācijas"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="Atļāva pārsūdzēt Court of Apelācijas (Apelācijas tiesa) spriedumu. 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Apelācijas"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2017 m. spalio 20 d. sprendimu Court of Appeal (Apeliacinis teismas, Airija) atmetė PF skundą dėl High Court (Aukštasis teismas) sprendimo ir patvirtino, kad Lietuvos generalinis prokuroras yra „teisminė institucija“, kaip tai suprantama pagal minėtą nuostatą.
Supreme Court (Aukščiausiasis Teismas, Airija), prašymą priimti prejudicinį sprendimą pateikęs teismas, leido paduoti skundą dėl Court of Appeal (Apeliacinis teismas) sprendimo.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Apeliacinis teismas (Airija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Apeliacinis teismas (Airija)"->"PF"[label="2017 m. spalio 20 d. sprendimu Court of Apeliacinis teismas (Apeliacinis teismas, Airija) atmetė PF skundą"];
  "PF"->"Court of Apeliacinis teismas (Airija)"[label="Apeliacinis teismas"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="leido paduoti skundą dėl Court of Apeliacinis teismas (Apeliacinis teismas) sprendimo. 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Apeliacinis teismas"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2017. október 20‑i ítéletében a Court of Appeal (fellebbviteli bíróság, Írország) elutasította PF‑nek a High Court (felsőbíróság) ítéletével szemben benyújtott fellebbezését, és megerősítette, hogy Litvánia főügyésze e rendelkezés szerinti „igazságügyi hatóság”.
A kérdést előterjesztő bíróság, a Supreme Court (legfelsőbb bíróság, Írország) engedélyezte jogorvoslat előterjesztését a Court of Appeal (fellebbviteli bíróság) ítélete ellen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of fellebbezését (Írország)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of fellebbezését (Írország)"->"PF"[label="2017. október 20‑i ítéletében a Court of fellebbezését (fellebbviteli bíróság, Írország) elutasította"];
  "PF"->"Court of fellebbezését (Írország)"[label="fellebbezését"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="Jogorvoslat előterjesztését a Court of fellebbezését (fellebbviteli bíróság) ítélete ellen. 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="fellebbezését"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Permezz tas-sentenza tal-20 ta’ Ottubru 2017, il-Court of Appeal (il-Qorti tal-Appell, l-Irlanda) ċaħdet l-appell ta’ PF mis-sentenza tal-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) u kkonfermat li l-Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja huwa “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira ta’ dik id-dispożizzjoni.
Il-qorti tar-rinviju, is-Supreme Court (il-Qorti Suprema, l-Irlanda) awtorizzat it-tressiq ta’ appell kontra s-sentenza tal-Court of Appeal (il-Qorti tal-Appell).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Appell (l-Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Appell (l-Irlanda)"->"PF"[label="Permezz tas-sentenza tal-20 ta’ Ottubru 2017, il-Court of Appell (il-Qorti tal-Appell, l-Irlanda) ċaħdet l-appell"];
  "PF"->"Court of Appell (l-Irlanda)"[label="Appell"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="awtorizzat it-tressiq ta’ appell kontra s-sentenza tal-Court of Appell 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Appell"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

In een arrest van 20 oktober 2017 heeft de Court of Appeal (rechter in tweede aanleg, Ierland) het hoger beroep van PF tegen het vonnis van de High Court verworpen en bevestigd dat de procureur-generaal van Litouwen een „rechterlijke autoriteit” is in de zin van die bepaling.
De verwijzende rechter, de Supreme Court (hoogste rechterlijke instantie, Ierland), heeft toestemming gegeven om hoger beroep in te stellen tegen het arrest van de Court of Appeal.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of beroep (Ierland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of beroep (Ierland)"->"PF"[label="In een arrest van 20 oktober 2017 heeft de Court of beroep (rechter in tweede aanleg, Ierland) het hoger beroep van PF tegen het vonnis van de High Court verworpen"];
  "PF"->"Court of beroep (Ierland)"[label="beroep"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="heeft toestemming gegeven om hoger beroep in te stellen tegen het arrest van de Court of beroep. 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="beroep"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

Wyrokiem z dnia 20 października 2017 r. Court of Appeal (sąd apelacyjny, Irlandia) oddalił odwołanie PF od wyroku High Court (wysokiego trybunału) i potwierdził, że prokurator generalny Litwy jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu tego przepisu.
Sąd odsyłający, Supreme Court (sąd najwyższy, Irlandia), zezwolił na wniesienie odwołania od wyroku Court of Appeal (sądu apelacyjnego).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of odwołania (Irlandia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of odwołania (Irlandia)"->"PF"[label="Wyrokiem z dnia 20 października 2017 r. Court of odwołania (sąd apelacyjny, Irlandia) oddalił odwołanie PF"];
  "PF"->"Court of odwołania (Irlandia)"[label="odwołania"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="Zezwolił na wniesienie odwołania od wyroku Court of odwołania (sądu apelacyjnego). 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="odwołania"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Por Acórdão de 20 de outubro de 2017, a Court of Appeal (Tribunal de Recurso, Irlanda) negou provimento ao recurso de PF contra a decisão da High Court (Tribunal Superior) e confirmou que o Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia é uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção desta disposição.
O órgão jurisdicional de reenvio, a Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal, Irlanda), autorizou a interposição de um recurso do acórdão da Court of Appeal (Tribunal de Recurso).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Tribunal de Recurso (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Tribunal de Recurso (Irlanda)"->"PF"[label="Acórdão de 20 de outubro de 2017"];
  "PF"->"Court of Tribunal de Recurso (Irlanda)"[label="Tribunal de Recurso"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="autorizou a interposição de um recurso do acórdão da Court of Tribunal de Recurso 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Tribunal de Recurso"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

Printr‑o hotărâre din 20 octombrie 2017, Court of Appeal (Curtea de Apel, Irlanda) a respins acțiunea lui PF împotriva hotărârii High Court (Înalta Curte) și a confirmat că procurorul general al Lituaniei este o „autoritate judiciară” în sensul acestei dispoziții.
Instanța de trimitere, Supreme Court (Curtea Supremă, Irlanda), a autorizat introducerea unui recurs împotriva Hotărârii Court of Appeal (Curtea de Apel).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Apel (Irlanda)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Apel (Irlanda)"->"PF"[label="hotărâre din 20 octombrie 2017"];
  "PF"->"Court of Apel (Irlanda)"[label="Apel"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="a autorizat introducerea unui recurs împotriva Hotărârii Court of Apel (Curtea de Apel) 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Apel"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Rozsudkom z 20. októbra 2017 Court of Appeal (Odvolací súd, Írsko) zamietol odvolanie PF proti rozsudku High Court (Vyšší súd) a potvrdil, že Generálna prokuratúra Litvy je „súdny orgán“ v zmysle tohto ustanovenia.
Supreme Court (Najvyšší súd, Írsko), ktorý položil prejudiciálne otázky, povolil podanie opravného prostriedku proti rozsudku Court of Appeal (Odvolací súd).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Odvolací súd (Írsko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Odvolací súd (Írsko)"->"PF"[label="zamietol"];
  "PF"->"Court of Odvolací súd (Írsko)"[label="Odvolací súd"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="povolil podanie opravného prostriedku proti rozsudku Court of Odvolací súd (Odvolací súd) 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Odvolací súd"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

Court of Appeal (pritožbeno sodišče, Irska) je s sodbo z dne 20. oktobra 2017 zavrnilo pritožbo PF zoper sodbo High Court (višje sodišče) in potrdilo, da je generalni državni tožilec Litve „pravosodni organ“ v smislu te določbe.
Predložitveno sodišče, Supreme Court (vrhovno sodišče, Irska), je dopustilo pritožbo zoper sodbo Court of Appeal (pritožbeno sodišče).

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of pritožbo (Irska)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of pritožbo (Irska)"->"PF"[label="z dne 20. oktobra 2017 zavrnilo"];
  "PF"->"Court of pritožbo (Irska)"[label="pritožbo"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="je dopustilo pritožbo zoper sodbo Court of pritožbo (pritožbeno sodišče) 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="pritožbo"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

Court of Appeal (ylioikeus, Irlanti) hylkäsi 20.10.2017 antamallaan ratkaisulla PF:n valituksen High Courtin ratkaisusta ja vahvisti kannan, jonka mukaan Liettuan syyttäjäviranomainen on mainitussa säännöksessä tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen.
Ennakkoratkaisua pyytänyt tuomioistuin, Supreme Court (ylin tuomioistuin, Irlanti) antoi luvan valittaa Court of Appealin ratkaisusta.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of Court of Appeal (Irlanti)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of Court of Appeal (Irlanti)"->"PF"[label="hylkäsi 20.10.2017"];
  "PF"->"Court of Court of Appeal (Irlanti)"[label="Court of Appeal"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="Antoi luvan valittaa Court of Appealin ratkaisusta. 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="Court of Appeal"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

PF överklagade domen från High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål) till Court of Appeal (Appellationsdomstolen, Irland) som avslog överklagandet den 20 oktober 2017. Court of Appeal slog fast att Litauens riksåklagare är en ”rättslig myndighet” i den mening som avses i denna bestämmelse.
Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen, Irland), som är den domstol som begärt förhandsavgörande från EU-domstolen, meddelade prövningstillstånd och förordnade att domen från Court of Appeal (Appellationsdomstolen) fick överklagas.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Court of överklagade (Irland)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   
  "Court of överklagade (Irland)"->"PF"[label="avslog överklagandet den 20 oktober 2017"];
  "PF"->"Court of överklagade (Irland)"[label="överklagade"];
  "High Court"->"PF"[label="förordnade att domen från Court of överklagade (Appellationsdomstolen) fick överklagas 27/02/2017"];
  "PF"->"High Court"[label="överklagade"];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: English

OG is a Lithuanian national residing in Ireland. On 13 May 2016 his surrender was sought pursuant to a European arrest warrant issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Lübeck for the prosecution of a criminal offence which OG allegedly committed in 1995 which that public prosecutor’s office identifies as ‘murder, grievous bodily injury’.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "Public Prosecutor’s Office in Lübeck"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Ireland"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "European arrest warrant"[shape=trapezium];
   
   "Public Prosecutor’s Office in Lübeck"->"European arrest warrant"[label="Issue 13/05/2016"];
   "European arrest warrant"->"Ireland"[label="Seek surrender of OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

OG е литовски гражданин, пребиваващ в Ирландия. На 13 май 2016 г. е поискано той да бъде предаден в изпълнение на европейска заповед за арест, издадена от прокуратурата на Любек за целите на наказателно преследване за деяния, които OG е извършил през 1995 г. и които посочената прокуратура квалифицира като „убийство, тежка телесна повреда“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "прокуратурата на Любек"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Ирландия"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "европейска заповед за арест"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "прокуратурата на Любек"->"европейска заповед за арест"[label="издадена от прокуратурата на Любек 13/05/2016"];
  "европейска заповед за арест"->"Ирландия"[label="поискано той да бъде предаден OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Spanish

OG es un nacional lituano que reside en Irlanda. El 13 de mayo de 2016 se solicitó su entrega en virtud de una orden de detención europea emitida por la Fiscalía de Lübeck para enjuiciarlo por unos hechos presuntamente cometidos por OG en 1995 y que esta califica de «homicidio voluntario, agresión con lesiones graves».

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Fiscalía de Lübeck"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irlanda"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "orden de detención europea"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "Fiscalía de Lübeck"->"orden de detención europea"[label="orden de detención europea emitida 13/05/2016"];
  "orden de detención europea"->"Irlanda"[label="se solicitó su entrega OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Czech

OG je litevským státním příslušníkem s bydlištěm v Irsku. Dne 13. května 2016 bylo jeho předání požadováno v rámci výkonu evropského zatýkacího rozkazu, který vydalo státní zastupitelství v Lübecku za účelem trestního stíhání činu, který OG údajně spáchal v roce 1995 a toto státní zastupitelství jej kvalifikovalo jako „vražda, těžké ublížení na zdraví“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "státní zastupitelství v Lübecku"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irsku"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "evropského zatýkacího rozkazu"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "státní zastupitelství v Lübecku"->"evropského zatýkacího rozkazu"[label="Dne 13. května 2016 bylo jeho předání požadováno v rámci výkonu evropského zatýkacího rozkazu, který vydalo státní zastupitelství v Lübecku za účelem trestního stíhání činu, který OG údajně spáchal v roce 1995 a toto státní zastupitelství jej kvalifikovalo jako „vražda, těžké ublížení na zdraví“. 13/05/2016"];
  "evropského zatýkacího rozkazu"->"Irsku"[label="bylo jeho předání požadováno OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Danish

OG er litauisk statsborger med bopæl i Irland. Den 13. maj 2016 blev den pågældende begæret overgivet i henhold til en europæisk arrestordre udstedt af anklagemyndigheden i Lübeck med henblik på strafferetlig forfølgning for gerninger, som OG angiveligt havde begået i 1995, og som anklagemyndigheden kvalificerede som »forsætligt manddrab og grov legemsbeskadigelse«.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "anklagemyndigheden i Lübeck"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irland"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europæisk arrestordre"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "anklagemyndigheden i Lübeck"->"europæisk arrestordre"[label="overgivet i henhold til en europæisk arrestordre udstedt af anklagemyndigheden i Lübeck 13/05/2016"];
  "europæisk arrestordre"->"Irland"[label="begæret overgivet OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: German

OG ist ein litauischer Staatsangehöriger mit Wohnsitz in Irland. Am 13. Mai 2016 erließ die Staatsanwaltschaft Lübeck einen Europäischen Haftbefehl, um seine Übergabe zur Strafverfolgung wegen einer Tat zu erwirken, die OG im Jahr 1995 begangen haben soll und die von der Staatsanwaltschaft als „vorsätzliche Tötung, schwere Körperverletzung“ qualifiziert wird.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Staatsanwaltschaft Lübeck"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irland"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europäischen Haftbefehl"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "Staatsanwaltschaft Lübeck"->"Europäischen Haftbefehl"[label="erließ 13/05/2016"];
  "Europäischen Haftbefehl"->"Irland"[label="Übergabe zur Strafverfolgung erwirken OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Estonian

OG on Leedu kodanik, kelle elukoht on Iirimaal. 13. mail 2016 taotleti Lübecki prokuratuuri tehtud Euroopa vahistamismääruse alusel tema üleandmist kriminaalmenetluse raames kohtu alla andmiseks seoses OG poolt väidetavalt 1995. aastal toime pandud kuriteoga, mille prokurör kvalifitseeris „tahtlikuks tapmiseks, raske kehavigastuse tekitamiseks“.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Lübecki prokuratuur"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Iirimaal"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "Lübecki prokuratuur"->"Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[label="13. mail 2016 taotleti Lübecki prokuratuuri tehtud Euroopa vahistamismääruse alusel tema üleandmist kriminaalmenetluse raames kohtu alla andmiseks seoses OG poolt väidetavalt 1995. aastal toime pandud kuriteoga 13/05/2016"];
  "Euroopa vahistamismääruse"->"Iirimaal"[label="tema üleandmist kriminaalmenetluse raames kohtu alla andmiseks OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Greek

Ο OG είναι Λιθουανός υπήκοος που διαμένει στην Ιρλανδία. Στις 13 Μαΐου 2016 ζητήθηκε η παράδοσή του σε εκτέλεση ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως το οποίο είχε εκδοθεί από την εισαγγελία του Lübeck, στο πλαίσιο ποινικής διώξεως εις βάρος του OG για πράξεις που φέρεται να τέλεσε το έτος 1995, οι οποίες χαρακτηρίστηκαν από την εν λόγω εισαγγελία ως «ανθρωποκτονία εκ προθέσεως και βαριές σωματικές βλάβες».

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "εισαγγελία του Lübeck"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Ιρλανδία"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "εισαγγελία του Lübeck"->"ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως"[label="ποινικής διώξεως 13/05/2016"];
  "ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως"->"Ιρλανδία"[label="ζητήθηκε η παράδοσή του OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: French

OG est un ressortissant lituanien séjournant en Irlande. Le 13 mai 2016, sa remise a été demandée en application d’un mandat d’arrêt européen émis par le parquet de Lübeck aux fins de poursuites pénales pour des faits que OG aurait commis au cours de l’année 1995 et que ce parquet a qualifiés d’« homicide volontaire, coups et blessures graves ».

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "le parquet de Lübeck"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irlande"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "le parquet de Lübeck"->"mandat d’arrêt européen"[label="émis 13/05/2016"];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"->"Irlande"[label="sa remise a été demandée OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Croatian

OG je litavski državljanin koji boravi u Irskoj. Dana 13. svibnja 2016. zatražena je njegova predaja u okviru izvršenja europskog uhidbenog naloga koji je izdalo Državno odvjetništvo u Lübecku, radi kaznenog progona zbog kaznenog djela koje je OG navodno počinio tijekom 1995., a koje je to državno odvjetništvo okvalificiralo kao „ubojstvo počinjeno s namjerom i nanošenje teških tjelesnih ozljeda”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Državno odvjetništvo u Lübecku"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irskoj"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europskog uhidbenog naloga"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "Državno odvjetništvo u Lübecku"->"europskog uhidbenog naloga"[label="izvršenja europskog uhidbenog naloga 13/05/2016"];
  "europskog uhidbenog naloga"->"Irskoj"[label="zatražena je njegova predaja OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Italian

OG è un cittadino lituano residente in Irlanda. Il 13 maggio 2016 è stata richiesta la sua consegna in applicazione di un mandato d’arresto europeo emesso dalla procura di Lubecca ai fini dell’esercizio di un’azione penale per fatti che OG avrebbe commesso nel 1995 e che tale procura ha qualificato come «omicidio volontario, lesioni personali gravi».

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "procura di Lubecca"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Irlanda"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "procura di Lubecca"->"mandato d’arresto europeo"[label="mandato d’arresto europeo 13/05/2016"];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"->"Irlanda"[label="è stata richiesta la sua consegna OG 13/05/2016"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
OG and PI.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court and High Court (Ireland).
References for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by a public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Legal position — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Ministry of Justice to issue an instruction in a specific case — No guarantee of independence.
Joined Cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU. (2019)
Language: Latvian

OG ir Lietuvas pilsonis, kurš uzturas Īrijā. 2016. gada 13. maijā atbilstoši Lībekas apgabaltiesas prokuratūras izsniegtam Eiropas apcietināšanas orderim tika lūgta viņa nodošana kriminālvajāšanai par noziedzīgiem nodarījumiem, ko OG esot izdarījis 1995. gadā un ko minētā prokuratūra bija kvalificējusi kā “slepkavību un smagus miesas bojājumus”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "Lībekas apgabaltiesas prokuratūra"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Īrijā"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[shape=trapezium];
   
  "Lībekas apgabaltiesas prokuratūra"->"Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[label="2016. gada 13. maijā atbilstoši Lībekas apgabaltiesas prokuratūras izsniegtam Eiropas apcietināšanas orderim tika lūgta viņa nodošana kriminālvajāšanai par noziedzīgiem nodarījumiem, ko OG esot izdarījis 1995. gadā un ko minētā prokuratūra bija kvalificējusi kā “slepkavību un smagus miesas bojājumus”. 13/05/2016"];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"->"Īrijā"[label="lūgta viņa nodošana OG 13/05/2016"];
}