mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

PF a sesizat High Court (Înalta Curte) cu o acțiune prin care contestă validitatea acestui mandat european de arestare invocând printre altele faptul că procurorul general al Lituaniei nu este o „autoritate judiciară” în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"a sesizat High Court (Înalta Curte) cu o acțiune";
  "a sesizat High Court (Înalta Curte) cu o acțiune"->"The High Court";
  "a sesizat High Court (Înalta Curte) cu o acțiune"->"validitatea acestui mandat european de arestare"[dir=none];
  "validitatea acestui mandat european de arestare"->"procurorul general al Lituaniei nu este o „autoritate judiciară” în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584. 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

PF podal na High Court (Vyšší súd) žalobu, ktorou namietal platnosť tohto európskeho zatykača, pričom predovšetkým uviedol, že Generálna prokuratúra Litvy nie je „súdny orgán“ v zmysle článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"podal na High Court (Vyšší súd) žalobu";
  "podal na High Court (Vyšší súd) žalobu"->"The High Court";
  "podal na High Court (Vyšší súd) žalobu"->"platnosť tohto európskeho zatykača"[dir=none];
  "platnosť tohto európskeho zatykača"->"že Generálna prokuratúra Litvy nie je „súdny orgán“ v zmysle článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Slovenian

PF je vložil tožbo pri High Court (višje sodišče), s katero izpodbija veljavnost evropskega naloga za prijetje in med drugim navaja, da generalni državni tožilec Litve ni „pravosodni organ“ v smislu člena 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"je vložil tožbo";
  "je vložil tožbo"->"The High Court";
  "je vložil tožbo"->"veljavnost evropskega naloga za prijetje"[dir=none];
  "veljavnost evropskega naloga za prijetje"->"da generalni državni tožilec Litve ni „pravosodni organ“ v smislu člena 6(1) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Finnish

PF kiisti High Courtissa kyseisen eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen pätevyyden vetoamalla muun muassa siihen, ettei Liettuan yleinen syyttäjä ole puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"Kiisti High Courtissa";
  "Kiisti High Courtissa"->"The High Court";
  "Kiisti High Courtissa"->"kyseisen eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen pätevyyden"[dir=none];
  "kyseisen eurooppalaisen pidätysmääräyksen pätevyyden"->"Liettuan yleinen syyttäjä ei ole puitepäätöksen 2002/584 6 artiklan 1 kohdassa tarkoitettu oikeusviranomainen. 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Swedish

PF överklagade till High Court (Överdomstolen i brottmål) och gjorde gällande att den europeiska arresteringsordern inte var giltig. Han gjorde därvid bland annat gällande att Litauens riksåklagare inte är en ”rättslig myndighet” i den mening som avses i artikel 6.1 i rambeslut 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
    
  "PF"->"överklagade till High Court";
  "överklagade till High Court"->"The High Court";
  "överklagade till High Court"->"den europeiska arresteringsordern inte var giltig"[dir=none];
  "den europeiska arresteringsordern inte var giltig"->"Litauens riksåklagare inte är en ”rättslig myndighet” i den mening som avses i artikel 6.1 i rambeslut 2002/584. 2002/584"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: English

On 18 April 2014, the surrender of PF, a Lithuanian national, was sought pursuant to a European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of Lithuania for the prosecution of a criminal offence which PF allegedly committed in 2012 and which, according to the public prosecutor, must be identified as ‘armed robbery’.
PF brought an action before the High Court challenging the validity of that European arrest warrant, on the ground, inter alia, that the Prosecutor General of Lithuania is not a ‘judicial authority’ within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "Lithuanian national"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The Prosecutor General of Lithuania"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "European arrest warrant"[shape=trapezium];
    
   "PF"->"Bring an action";
   "Bring an action"->"The High Court";
   "Bring an action"->"The validity of that European arrest warrant"[dir=none];
   "The validity of that European arrest warrant"->"The Prosecutor General of Lithuania is not a ‘judicial authority’ within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584"[dir=none];
   "Lithuanian national"->"Surrender 18/04/2014";
   "Surrender 18/04/2014"->"PF";
   "Surrender 18/04/2014"->"European arrest warrant";
   "The Prosecutor General of Lithuania"->"European arrest warrant"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Bulgarian

На 18 април 2014 г. е поискано PF, литовски гражданин, да бъде предаден в изпълнение на европейска заповед за арест, издадена от генералния прокурор на Литва за целите на наказателно преследване за деяния, които PF е извършил през 2012 г. и които посоченият прокурор квалифицира като въоръжен грабеж.
PF подава пред High Court (Висш съд) жалба, с която оспорва валидността на тази европейска заповед за арест, като по-специално изтъква факта, че главният прокурор на Литва не е съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "литовски гражданин"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "генералния прокурор на Литва"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "европейска заповед за арест"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"подава пред High Court (Висш съд) жалба";
  "подава пред High Court (Висш съд) жалба"->"The High Court";
  "подава пред High Court (Висш съд) жалба"->"валидността на тази европейска заповед за арест"[dir=none];
  "валидността на тази европейска заповед за арест"->"главният прокурор на Литва не е съдебен орган по смисъла на член 6, параграф 1 от Рамково решение 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "литовски гражданин"->"На 18 април 2014 г. е поискано PF, литовски гражданин, да бъде предаден";
  "На 18 април 2014 г. е поискано PF, литовски гражданин, да бъде предаден"->"PF";
  "На 18 април 2014 г. е поискано PF, литовски гражданин, да бъде предаден"->"европейска заповед за арест";
  "генералния прокурор на Литва"->"европейска заповед за арест"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Spanish

El 18 de abril de 2014 se solicitó la entrega de PF, de nacionalidad lituana, en virtud de una orden de detención europea emitida por el Fiscal General de Lituania para enjuiciarlo por unos hechos presuntamente cometidos en 2012 y que según el citado Fiscal deben calificarse de «robo a mano armada».
PF interpuso recurso ante la High Court (Tribunal Superior) mediante el que impugnó la validez de dicha orden de detención europea, alegando en particular que el Fiscal General de Lituania no es una «autoridad judicial» en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de nacionalidad lituana"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "el Fiscal General de Lituania"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "orden de detención europea"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"interpuso recurso";
  "interpuso recurso"->"The High Court";
  "interpuso recurso"->"la validez de dicha orden de detención europea"[dir=none];
  "la validez de dicha orden de detención europea"->"el Fiscal General de Lituania no es una «autoridad judicial» en el sentido del artículo 6, apartado 1, de la Decisión Marco 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "de nacionalidad lituana"->"El 18 de abril de 2014 se solicitó la entrega de PF";
  "El 18 de abril de 2014 se solicitó la entrega de PF"->"PF";
  "El 18 de abril de 2014 se solicitó la entrega de PF"->"orden de detención europea";
  "el Fiscal General de Lituania"->"orden de detención europea"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Czech

Dne 18. dubna 2014 bylo požádáno o předání PF, litevského státního příslušníka, na základě evropského zatýkacího rozkazu vydaného nejvyšším státním zástupcem Litvy pro účely trestního stíhání činu údajně spáchaného PF v roce 2012, který musí být podle tohoto státního zástupce kvalifikován jako „ozbrojená loupež“.
PF podal k High Court (Vrchní soud) žalobu směřující ke zpochybnění platnosti tohoto evropského zatýkacího rozkazu, přičemž se dovolával zejména toho, že nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy není „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "litevského státního příslušníka"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "evropského zatýkacího rozkazu"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"podal žalobu";
  "podal žalobu"->"The High Court";
  "podal žalobu"->"platnosti tohoto evropského zatýkacího rozkazu"[dir=none];
  "platnosti tohoto evropského zatýkacího rozkazu"->"že nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy není „justičním orgánem“ ve smyslu čl. 6 odst. 1 rámcového rozhodnutí 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "litevského státního příslušníka"->"Dne 18. dubna 2014 bylo požádáno o předání PF,";
  "Dne 18. dubna 2014 bylo požádáno o předání PF,"->"PF";
  "Dne 18. dubna 2014 bylo požádáno o předání PF,"->"evropského zatýkacího rozkazu";
  "nejvyšší státní zástupce Litvy"->"evropského zatýkacího rozkazu"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Danish

Den 18. april 2014 blev den litauiske statsborger PF begæret overgivet i henhold til en europæisk arrestordre udstedt af Litauens øverste anklager med henblik på strafferetlig forfølgning for gerninger, som PF angiveligt har begået i 2012, og som ifølge denne anklager skal kvalificeres som »væbnet røveri«.
PF anlagde sag ved High Court (ret i første instans) med henblik på at anfægte gyldigheden af den europæiske arrestordre, idet PF bl.a. påberåbte sig den omstændighed, at Litauens øverste anklager ikke er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "den litauiske statsborger"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Litauens øverste anklager"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europæiske arrestordre"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"anlagde sag";
  "anlagde sag"->"The High Court";
  "anlagde sag"->"gyldigheden af den europæiske arrestordre"[dir=none];
  "gyldigheden af den europæiske arrestordre"->"Litauens øverste anklager ikke er en »judiciel myndighed« som omhandlet i artikel 6, stk. 1, i rammeafgørelse 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "den litauiske statsborger"->"Den 18. april 2014 blev den litauiske statsborger PF begæret overgivet";
  "Den 18. april 2014 blev den litauiske statsborger PF begæret overgivet"->"PF";
  "Den 18. april 2014 blev den litauiske statsborger PF begæret overgivet"->"europæiske arrestordre";
  "Litauens øverste anklager"->"europæiske arrestordre"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: German

Am 18. April 2014 erließ der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen einen Europäischen Haftbefehl, um die Übergabe von PF, eines litauischen Staatsangehörigen, zur Strafverfolgung wegen einer Tat zu erwirken, die PF im Jahr 2012 begangen haben soll und die vom Generalstaatsanwalt als „Diebstahl mit Waffen“ qualifiziert wird.
PF erhob vor dem High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) Klage und stellte die Gültigkeit des Europäischen Haftbefehls u. a. mit dem Einwand in Abrede, dass der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen keine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584 sei.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "eines litauischen Staatsangehörigen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europäischen Haftbefehl"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"erhob vor dem High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) Klage";
  "erhob vor dem High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) Klage"->"The High Court";
  "erhob vor dem High Court (Hoher Gerichtshof) Klage"->"die Gültigkeit des Europäischen Haftbefehls"[dir=none];
  "die Gültigkeit des Europäischen Haftbefehls"->"der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen keine „Justizbehörde“ im Sinne von Art. 6 Abs. 1 des Rahmenbeschlusses 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "eines litauischen Staatsangehörigen"->"Am 18. April 2014";
  "Am 18. April 2014"->"PF";
  "Am 18. April 2014"->"Europäischen Haftbefehl";
  "der Generalstaatsanwalt von Litauen"->"Europäischen Haftbefehl"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Estonian

18. aprillil 2014 taotleti Leedu kodaniku PF üleandmist Leedu peaprokuröri tehtud Euroopa vahistamismääruse alusel kriminaalmenetluse raames kohtu alla andmiseks seoses PF-i poolt väidetavalt 2012. aastal toime pandud kuriteoga, mis peaprokuröri kinnitusel tuleb kvalifitseerida „relvastatud röövimiseks“.
PF esitas High Courtile (kõrge kohus) kaebuse, millega vaidlustas selle Euroopa vahistamismääruse kehtivuse, tuginedes eelkõige asjaolule, et Leedu peaprokurör ei ole „õigusasutus“ raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Leedu kodaniku"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Leedu peaprokurör"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"esitas kaebuse";
  "esitas kaebuse"->"The High Court";
  "esitas kaebuse"->"selle Euroopa vahistamismääruse kehtivuse"[dir=none];
  "selle Euroopa vahistamismääruse kehtivuse"->"Leedu peaprokurör ei ole „õigusasutus“ raamotsuse 2002/584 artikli 6 lõike 1 tähenduses. 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "Leedu kodaniku"->"18. aprillil 2014 taotleti Leedu kodaniku PF üleandmist";
  "18. aprillil 2014 taotleti Leedu kodaniku PF üleandmist"->"PF";
  "18. aprillil 2014 taotleti Leedu kodaniku PF üleandmist"->"Euroopa vahistamismääruse";
  "Leedu peaprokurör"->"Euroopa vahistamismääruse"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Greek

Στις 18 Απριλίου 2014 ζητήθηκε η παράδοση του PF, Λιθουανού υπηκόου, σε εκτέλεση ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως το οποίο είχε εκδοθεί από τον γενικό εισαγγελέα της Λιθουανίας, στο πλαίσιο ποινικής διώξεως σε βάρος του PF για πράξεις που φέρεται να τέλεσε το έτος 2012, οι οποίες χαρακτηρίστηκαν από τον εν λόγω εισαγγελέα ως «ένοπλη ληστεία».
Ο PF προσέφυγε ενώπιον του High Court (ανώτερου δικαστηρίου) αμφισβητώντας την εγκυρότητα αυτού του ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως και προβάλλοντας, μεταξύ άλλων, ότι ο γενικός εισαγγελέας της Λιθουανίας δεν είναι «δικαστική αρχή» κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Λιθουανού υπηκόου"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ο γενικός εισαγγελέας της Λιθουανίας"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"προσέφυγε";
  "προσέφυγε"->"The High Court";
  "προσέφυγε"->"την εγκυρότητα αυτού του ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως"[dir=none];
  "την εγκυρότητα αυτού του ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως"->"ότι ο γενικός εισαγγελέας της Λιθουανίας δεν είναι «δικαστική αρχή» κατά την έννοια του άρθρου 6, παράγραφος 1, της αποφάσεως-πλαισίου 2002/584. 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "Λιθουανού υπηκόου"->"Στις 18 Απριλίου 2014 ζητήθηκε η παράδοση";
  "Στις 18 Απριλίου 2014 ζητήθηκε η παράδοση"->"PF";
  "Στις 18 Απριλίου 2014 ζητήθηκε η παράδοση"->"ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως";
  "ο γενικός εισαγγελέας της Λιθουανίας"->"ευρωπαϊκού εντάλματος συλλήψεως"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: French

Le 18 avril 2014, la remise de PF, un ressortissant lituanien, a été demandée en application d’un mandat d’arrêt européen émis par le procureur général de Lituanie, aux fins de poursuites pénales pour des faits que PF aurait commis au cours de l’année 2012 et qui, selon ce procureur, doivent être qualifiés de « vol à main armée ».
PF a saisi la High Court (Haute Cour) d’un recours tendant à contester la validité de ce mandat d’arrêt européen en invoquant, notamment, le fait que le procureur général de Lituanie n’est pas une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "un ressortissant lituanien"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "le procureur général de Lituanie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat d’arrêt européen"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"d’un recours";
  "d’un recours"->"The High Court";
  "d’un recours"->"la validité de ce mandat d’arrêt européen"[dir=none];
  "la validité de ce mandat d’arrêt européen"->"le procureur général de Lituanie n’est pas une « autorité judiciaire », au sens de l’article 6, paragraphe 1, de la décision-cadre 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "un ressortissant lituanien"->"Le 18 avril 2014, la remise de PF";
  "Le 18 avril 2014, la remise de PF"->"PF";
  "Le 18 avril 2014, la remise de PF"->"mandat d’arrêt européen";
  "le procureur général de Lituanie"->"mandat d’arrêt européen"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Croatian

Dana 18. travnja 2014. zatražena je predaja osobe PF, litavskog državljanina, u okviru izvršenja europskog uhidbenog naloga koji je izdao Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve radi provedbe kaznenog postupka zbog kaznenog djela koje je PF navodno počinio tijekom 2012., a koje je taj državni odvjetnik okvalificirao kao „oružanu krađu”.
PF je pred High Courtom (Visoki sud) osporavao valjanost tog europskog uhidbenog naloga pozivajući se, osobito, na činjenicu da Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve nije „pravosudno tijelo” u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. Okvirne odluke 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "litavskog državljanina"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europskog uhidbenog naloga"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"osporavao valjanost";
  "osporavao valjanost"->"The High Court";
  "osporavao valjanost"->"valjanost tog europskog uhidbenog naloga"[dir=none];
  "valjanost tog europskog uhidbenog naloga"->"Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve nije „pravosudno tijelo” u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. Okvirne odluke 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "litavskog državljanina"->"Dana 18. travnja 2014. zatražena je predaja osobe PF, litavskog državljanina";
  "Dana 18. travnja 2014. zatražena je predaja osobe PF, litavskog državljanina"->"PF";
  "Dana 18. travnja 2014. zatražena je predaja osobe PF, litavskog državljanina"->"europskog uhidbenog naloga";
  "Glavni državni odvjetnik Litve"->"europskog uhidbenog naloga"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Italian

Il 18 aprile 2014 è stata richiesta la consegna di PF, cittadino lituano, in applicazione di un mandato d’arresto europeo emesso dal procuratore generale di Lituania ai fini dell’esercizio di un’azione penale per fatti che PF avrebbe commesso nel corso del 2012 e che, secondo tale procuratore, devono essere qualificati come «rapina a mano armata».
PF ha proposto dinanzi alla High Court (Alta Corte) un ricorso volto a contestare la validità di tale mandato d’arresto europeo, sostenendo, segnatamente, che il procuratore generale di Lituania non è un’«autorità giudiziaria», ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "cittadino lituano"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "il procuratore generale di Lituania"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandato d’arresto europeo"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"esercizio di un’azione penale";
  "esercizio di un’azione penale"->"The High Court";
  "esercizio di un’azione penale"->"la validità di tale mandato d’arresto europeo"[dir=none];
  "la validità di tale mandato d’arresto europeo"->"il procuratore generale di Lituania non è un’«autorità giudiziaria», ai sensi dell’articolo 6, paragrafo 1, della decisione quadro 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "cittadino lituano"->"Il 18 aprile 2014 è stata richiesta la consegna";
  "Il 18 aprile 2014 è stata richiesta la consegna"->"PF";
  "Il 18 aprile 2014 è stata richiesta la consegna"->"mandato d’arresto europeo";
  "il procuratore generale di Lituania"->"mandato d’arresto europeo"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Latvian

2014. gada 18. aprīlī atbilstoši Lietuvas ģenerālprokurora izsniegtam Eiropas apcietināšanas orderim tika lūgta Lietuvas pilsoņa PF nodošana kriminālvajāšanai par noziedzīgiem nodarījumiem, ko PF esot izdarījis 2012. gadā un kas minētā prokurora ieskatā kvalificējami kā “bruņota laupīšana”.
PF cēla prasību High Court (Augstā tiesa), apstrīdot šī Eiropas apcietināšanas ordera spēkā esamību, tostarp norādot, ka Lietuvas ģenerālprokurors nav “tiesu iestāde” Pamatlēmuma 2002/584 6. panta 1. punkta izpratnē.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Lietuvas pilsoņa"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Lietuvas ģenerālprokurors"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"cēla prasību";
  "cēla prasību"->"The High Court";
  "cēla prasību"->"šī Eiropas apcietināšanas ordera spēkā esamību"[dir=none];
  "šī Eiropas apcietināšanas ordera spēkā esamību"->"Lietuvas ģenerālprokurors nav “tiesu iestāde” Pamatlēmuma 2002/584 6. panta 1. punkta izpratnē. 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "Lietuvas pilsoņa"->"2014. gada 18. aprīlī";
  "2014. gada 18. aprīlī"->"PF";
  "2014. gada 18. aprīlī"->"Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis";
  "Lietuvas ģenerālprokurors"->"Eiropas apcietināšanas orderis"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Lithuanian

2014 m. balandžio 18 d. remiantis Lietuvos generalinio prokuroro išduotu Europos arešto orderiu buvo paprašyta perduoti PF, Lietuvos pilietį, siekiant vykdyti baudžiamąjį persekiojimą dėl 2012 m. PF padarytų veikų, kurios, šio prokuroro teigimu, turi būti kvalifikuojamos kaip „plėšimas panaudojant šaunamąjį ginklą“.
PF High Court (Aukštasis teismas) pateikė skundą, juo siekė užginčyti šio Europos arešto orderio galiojimą, visų pirma remdamasis tuo, kad Lietuvos generalinis prokuroras nėra „teisminė institucija“, kaip tai suprantama pagal Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 6 straipsnio 1 dalį.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Lietuvos pilietį"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Lietuvos generalinis prokuroras"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europos arešto orderis"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"pateikė skundą";
  "pateikė skundą"->"The High Court";
  "pateikė skundą"->"šio Europos arešto orderio galiojimą"[dir=none];
  "šio Europos arešto orderio galiojimą"->"Lietuvos generalinis prokuroras nėra „teisminė institucija“, kaip tai suprantama pagal Pagrindų sprendimo 2002/584 6 straipsnio 1 dalį. 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "Lietuvos pilietį"->"2014 m. balandžio 18 d.";
  "2014 m. balandžio 18 d."->"PF";
  "2014 m. balandžio 18 d."->"Europos arešto orderis";
  "Lietuvos generalinis prokuroras"->"Europos arešto orderis"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Hungarian

2014. április 18‑án a Litvánia főügyésze által kibocsátott európai elfogatóparancs alapján kérték PF átadását az általa állítólagosan 2012‑ben elkövetett, ezen ügyész által „fegyveres rablásnak” minősített cselekmények miatti büntetőeljárás lefolytatása céljából.
PF keresetet indított a High Court (felsőbíróság) előtt ezen európai elfogatóparancs érvényességének vitatása céljából, többek között arra hivatkozva, hogy Litvánia főügyésze nem a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése értelmében vett „igazságügyi hatóság”.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Litvánia főügyésze"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "a Litvánia főügyésze"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európai elfogatóparancs"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"keresetet indított";
  "keresetet indított"->"The High Court";
  "keresetet indított"->"ezen európai elfogatóparancs érvényességének"[dir=none];
  "ezen európai elfogatóparancs érvényességének"->"Litvánia főügyésze nem a 2002/584 kerethatározat 6. cikkének (1) bekezdése értelmében vett „igazságügyi hatóság”. 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "Litvánia főügyésze"->"2014. április 18";
  "2014. április 18"->"PF";
  "2014. április 18"->"európai elfogatóparancs";
  "a Litvánia főügyésze"->"európai elfogatóparancs"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Maltese

Fit-18 ta’ April 2014, intalbet il-konsenja ta’ PF, ċittadin Litwan, taħt mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew maħruġ mill-Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja għall-finijiet ta’ prosekuzzjoni kriminali għal fatti li PF allegatament wettaq matul l-2012 u li, skont dan il-Prosekutur, għandhom jiġu kklassifikati bħala “serqa bl-użu ta’ armi”.
PF ressaq rikors quddiem il-High Court (il-Qorti Għolja) biex jikkontesta l-validità ta’ dak il-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew, b’riferiment b’mod partikolari għall-fatt li l-Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja ma huwiex “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "ċittadin Litwan"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"ressaq rikors";
  "ressaq rikors"->"The High Court";
  "ressaq rikors"->"l-validità ta’ dak il-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[dir=none];
  "l-validità ta’ dak il-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"->"l-Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja ma huwiex “awtorità ġudizzjarja” skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 6(1) tad-Deċiżjoni Qafas 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "ċittadin Litwan"->"Fit-18 ta’ April 2014";
  "Fit-18 ta’ April 2014"->"PF";
  "Fit-18 ta’ April 2014"->"mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew";
  "Prosekutur Ġenerali tal-Litwanja"->"mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Dutch

Op 18 april 2014 werd de overlevering gevraagd van PF, een Litouws staatsburger, op grond van een door de procureur-generaal van Litouwen uitgevaardigd Europees aanhoudingsbevel met het oog op strafvervolging voor feiten die PF in de loop van 2012 zou hebben begaan en die volgens die procureur als „gewapende overval” moeten worden aangemerkt.
PF heeft bij de High Court beroep ingesteld ter betwisting van de geldigheid van dit Europees aanhoudingsbevel, waarbij hij onder meer betoogde dat de procureur-generaal van Litouwen geen „rechterlijke autoriteit” in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584 is.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "een Litouws staatsburger"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de procureur-generaal van Litouwen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"beroep ingesteld";
  "beroep ingesteld"->"The High Court";
  "beroep ingesteld"->"de geldigheid van dit Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[dir=none];
  "de geldigheid van dit Europees aanhoudingsbevel"->"de procureur-generaal van Litouwen geen „rechterlijke autoriteit” in de zin van artikel 6, lid 1, van kaderbesluit 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "een Litouws staatsburger"->"Op 18 april 2014 werd de overlevering gevraagd";
  "Op 18 april 2014 werd de overlevering gevraagd"->"PF";
  "Op 18 april 2014 werd de overlevering gevraagd"->"Europees aanhoudingsbevel";
  "de procureur-generaal van Litouwen"->"Europees aanhoudingsbevel"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Polish

W dniu 18 kwietnia 2014 r. prokurator generalny Litwy złożył wniosek o przekazanie PF, obywatela litewskiego, na podstawie europejskiego nakazu aresztowania wydanego w celu przeprowadzenia postępowania karnego w związku z czynami, jakie PF miał popełnić w 2012 r. i które według tego prokuratora należy zakwalifikować jako „kradzież z bronią w ręku”.
PF wniósł do High Court (wysokiego trybunału) skargę w celu podważenia ważności tego europejskiego nakazu aresztowania, powołując się w szczególności na fakt, że prokurator generalny Litwy nie jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "obywatela litewskiego"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "prokurator generalny Litwy"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "europejskiego nakazu aresztowania"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"złożył wniosek";
  "złożył wniosek"->"The High Court";
  "złożył wniosek"->"ważności tego europejskiego nakazu aresztowania"[dir=none];
  "ważności tego europejskiego nakazu aresztowania"->"prokurator generalny Litwy nie jest „organem sądowym” w rozumieniu art. 6 ust. 1 decyzji ramowej 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "obywatela litewskiego"->"18 kwietnia 2014 r.";
  "18 kwietnia 2014 r."->"PF";
  "18 kwietnia 2014 r."->"europejskiego nakazu aresztowania";
  "prokurator generalny Litwy"->"europejskiego nakazu aresztowania"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Portuguese

Em 18 de abril de 2014, foi pedida a entrega de PF, um nacional lituano, em aplicação de um mandado de detenção europeu emitido pelo Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia, para efeitos de procedimentos penais por atos que PF terá cometido durante 2012 e que, segundo esse procurador, devem ser qualificados de «roubo à mão armada».
PF recorreu à High Court (Tribunal Superior) no sentido de contestar a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu invocando, nomeadamente, o facto de o Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia não ser uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "um nacional lituano"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandado de detenção europeu"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"recorreu à High Court (Tribunal Superior) no sentido de contestar a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu";
  "recorreu à High Court (Tribunal Superior) no sentido de contestar a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu"->"The High Court";
  "recorreu à High Court (Tribunal Superior) no sentido de contestar a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu"->"a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu"[dir=none];
  "a validade desse mandado de detenção europeu"->"o Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia não ser uma «autoridade judiciária», na aceção do artigo 6.o, n.o 1, da Decisão‑Quadro 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "um nacional lituano"->"foi pedida a entrega de PF, um nacional lituano, em 18 de abril de 2014";
  "foi pedida a entrega de PF, um nacional lituano, em 18 de abril de 2014"->"PF";
  "foi pedida a entrega de PF, um nacional lituano, em 18 de abril de 2014"->"mandado de detenção europeu";
  "Procurador‑Geral da Lituânia"->"mandado de detenção europeu"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Romanian

La 18 aprilie 2014 a fost solicitată predarea lui PF, resortisant lituanian, în temeiul unui mandat european de arestare emis de procurorul general al Lituaniei pentru efectuarea urmăririi penale pentru fapte pe care PF le‑ar fi comis în cursul anului 2012 și care, potrivit acestui procuror, trebuie să fie calificate drept „jaf armat”.
PF a sesizat High Court (Înalta Curte) cu o acțiune prin care contestă validitatea acestui mandat european de arestare invocând printre altele faptul că procurorul general al Lituaniei nu este o „autoritate judiciară” în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "resortisant lituanian"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "procurorul general al Lituaniei"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "mandat european de arestare"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"a sesizat High Court (Înalta Curte) cu o acțiune";
  "a sesizat High Court (Înalta Curte) cu o acțiune"->"The High Court";
  "a sesizat High Court (Înalta Curte) cu o acțiune"->"validitatea acestui mandat european de arestare"[dir=none];
  "validitatea acestui mandat european de arestare"->"Procurorul general al Lituaniei nu este o „autoritate judiciară” în sensul articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Decizia‑cadru 2002/584. 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "resortisant lituanian"->"La 18 aprilie 2014 a fost solicitată predarea lui PF";
  "La 18 aprilie 2014 a fost solicitată predarea lui PF"->"PF";
  "La 18 aprilie 2014 a fost solicitată predarea lui PF"->"mandat european de arestare";
  "procurorul general al Lituaniei"->"mandat european de arestare"[label="Issue"];
}
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 May 2019.
Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the Prosecutor General of a Member State — Legal position — Guarantee of independence.
Case C-509/18. (2019)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 18. apríla 2014 Generálna prokuratúra Litvy vydala európsky zatykač, ktorým požiadala o odovzdanie PF, litovského štátneho príslušníka, na účely vedenia trestného stíhania za skutky, ktorých sa PF mal dopustiť v priebehu roka 2012 a ktoré sa podľa uvedenej prokuratúry majú kvalifikovať ako „ozbrojená lúpež“.
PF podal na High Court (Vyšší súd) žalobu, ktorou namietal platnosť tohto európskeho zatykača, pričom predovšetkým uviedol, že Generálna prokuratúra Litvy nie je „súdny orgán“ v zmysle článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The High Court"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "PF"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "litovského štátneho príslušníka"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Generálna prokuratúra Litvy"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "európsky zatykač"[shape=trapezium];
    
  "PF"->"podal žalobu";
  "podal žalobu"->"The High Court";
  "podal žalobu"->"platnosť tohto európskeho zatykača"[dir=none];
  "platnosť tohto európskeho zatykača"->"Generálna prokuratúra Litvy nie je „súdny orgán“ v zmysle článku 6 ods. 1 rámcového rozhodnutia 2002/584"[dir=none];
  "litovského štátneho príslušníka"->"Dňa 18. apríla 2014 Generálna prokuratúra Litvy vydala európsky zatykač, ktorým požiadala o odovzdanie PF";
  "Dňa 18. apríla 2014 Generálna prokuratúra Litvy vydala európsky zatykač, ktorým požiadala o odovzdanie PF"->"PF";
  "Dňa 18. apríla 2014 Generálna prokuratúra Litvy vydala európsky zatykač, ktorým požiadala o odovzdanie PF"->"európsky zatykač";
  "Generálna prokuratúra Litvy"->"európsky zatykač"[label="Issue"];
}