mizuumi1/LegalViz huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Hungarian

2018. június 21‑én és július 19‑én a strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (antwerpeni büntetés‑végrehajtási bíróság, Belgium) IK fogva tarthatónak nyilváníthatóságáról határozott. Ezen eljárás során az érintett úgy érvelt, hogy a holland hatóságok által engedélyezett átadás nem vonatkozhatott mellékbüntetésre, valamint hogy e bíróság nem rendelhet el szabadságelvonást e büntetés végrehajtása céljából, mivel a belga hatóságok által kibocsátott európai elfogatóparancs nem tartalmazta azt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen antwerpeni büntetés‑végrehajtási bíróság, Belgium"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen antwerpeni büntetés‑végrehajtási bíróság, Belgium"->"2018. június 21, 19/07/2018";
  "2018. június 21, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "2018. június 21, 19/07/2018"->"IK fogva tarthatónak nyilváníthatóságáról"[dir=none];
  "IK fogva tarthatónak nyilváníthatóságáról"->"Az érintett úgy érvelt, hogy a holland hatóságok által engedélyezett átadás nem vonatkozhatott mellékbüntetésre, valamint hogy e bíróság nem rendelhet el szabadságelvonást e büntetés végrehajtása céljából, mivel a belga hatóságok által kibocsátott európai elfogatóparancs nem tartalmazta azt.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Maltese

Fil-21 ta’ Ġunju u fid-19 ta’ Lulju 2018, l-istrafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (il-Qorti Penitenzjarja ta’ Anvers, il-Belġju) iddeċidiet dwar it-tqegħid għad-dispożizzjoni ta’ IK. Matul din il-proċedura, il-persuna kkonċernata sostniet li l-konsenja mill-awtoritajiet Olandiżi ma tistax tkun tikkonċerna l-piena addizzjonali u li dik il-qorti ma setgħetx tordna t-tiċħid tal-libertà għall-eżekuzzjoni ta’ din il-piena, peress li l-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew maħruġ mill-awtoritajiet Belġjani ma kienx isemmiha.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen l-istrafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (il-Qorti Penitenzjarja ta’ Anvers, il-Belġju)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen l-istrafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (il-Qorti Penitenzjarja ta’ Anvers, il-Belġju)"->"Fil-21 ta’ Ġunju 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "Fil-21 ta’ Ġunju 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Fil-21 ta’ Ġunju 2018, 19/07/2018"->"it-tqegħid għad-dispożizzjoni ta’ IK"[dir=none];
  "it-tqegħid għad-dispożizzjoni ta’ IK"->"Il-persuna kkonċernata sostniet li l-konsenja mill-awtoritajiet Olandiżi ma tistax tkun tikkonċerna l-piena addizzjonali u li dik il-qorti ma setgħetx tordna t-tiċħid tal-libertà għall-eżekuzzjoni ta’ din il-piena, peress li l-mandat ta’ arrest Ewropew maħruġ mill-awtoritajiet Belġjani ma kienx isemmiha.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Dutch

Op 21 juni en 19 juli 2018 heeft de strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (België) zich uitgesproken over de TBS van IK. Tijdens deze procedure heeft de betrokkene aangevoerd dat de overlevering door de Nederlandse autoriteiten geen betrekking kon hebben op de bijkomende straf en dat deze rechterlijke instantie geen vrijheidsbeneming ter uitvoering van deze straf kon bevelen, omdat het door de Belgische autoriteiten uitgevaardigde Europees aanhoudingsbevel geen melding maakte van deze straf.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (België)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (België)"->"Op 21 juni, 19/07/2018";
  "Op 21 juni, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Op 21 juni, 19/07/2018"->"TBS van IK"[dir=none];
  "TBS van IK"->"De betrokkene heeft aangevoerd dat de overlevering door de Nederlandse autoriteiten geen betrekking kon hebben op de bijkomende straf en dat deze rechterlijke instantie geen vrijheidsbeneming ter uitvoering van deze straf kon bevelen, omdat het door de Belgische autoriteiten uitgevaardigde Europees aanhoudingsbevel geen melding maakte van deze straf.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Polish

W dniu 21 czerwca i 19 lipca 2018 r. strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (sąd penitencjarny w Antwerpii, Belgia) orzekł w przedmiocie oddania IK do dyspozycji. W toku tego postępowania zainteresowany podniósł, że przekazanie przez organy niderlandzkie nie może dotyczyć kary dodatkowej i że sąd ten nie może zarządzić pozbawienia wolności w wykonaniu tej kary, biorąc pod uwagę, że wydany przez organy belgijskie europejski nakaz aresztowania nie zawierał informacji o karze dodatkowej.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (sąd penitencjarny w Antwerpii, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (sąd penitencjarny w Antwerpii, Belgia)"->"W dniu 21 czerwca, 19/07/2018";
  "W dniu 21 czerwca, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "W dniu 21 czerwca, 19/07/2018"->"oddania IK do dyspozycji"[dir=none];
  "oddania IK do dyspozycji"->"przekazanie przez organy niderlandzkie nie może dotyczyć kary dodatkowej i że sąd ten nie może zarządzić pozbawienia wolności w wykonaniu tej kary, biorąc pod uwagę, że wydany przez organy belgijskie europejski nakaz aresztowania nie zawierał informacji o karze dodatkowej.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Portuguese

Em 21 de junho e 19 de julho de 2018, o strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de Execução das Penas de Antuérpia, Bélgica) pronunciou‑se sobre a colocação à ordem do tribunal de IK. Nesse processo, o interessado alegou que a entrega pelas autoridades neerlandesas não podia incidir sobre a pena acessória e que esse órgão jurisdicional não podia ordenar a privação de liberdade para efeitos de execução dessa pena, dado que o mandado de detenção europeu emitido pelas autoridades belgas não a mencionava.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de Execução das Penas de Antuérpia, Bélgica)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de Execução das Penas de Antuérpia, Bélgica)"->"21 de junho de 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "21 de junho de 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21 de junho de 2018, 19/07/2018"->"colocação à ordem do tribunal de IK"[dir=none];
  "colocação à ordem do tribunal de IK"->"O interessado alegou que a entrega pelas autoridades neerlandesas não podia incidir sobre a pena acessória e que esse órgão jurisdicional não podia ordenar a privação de liberdade para efeitos de execução dessa pena, dado que o mandado de detenção europeu emitido pelas autoridades belgas não a mencionava.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Romanian

La 21 iunie și la 19 iulie 2018, strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Aplicarea Pedepselor din Antwerpen, Belgia) s‑a pronunțat cu privire la punerea la dispoziție a lui IK. În cadrul acestei proceduri, persoana interesată a susținut că predarea de către Țările de Jos nu putea avea legătură cu pedeapsa complementară și că această instanță nu putea dispune privarea de libertate în vederea executării acestei pedepse, întrucât mandatul european de arestare emis de autoritățile belgiene nu menționa această pedeapsă.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Aplicarea Pedepselor din Antwerpen, Belgia)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunalul pentru Aplicarea Pedepselor din Antwerpen, Belgia)"->"21 iunie 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "21 iunie 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21 iunie 2018, 19/07/2018"->"Punerea la dispoziție a lui IK."[dir=none];
  "Punerea la dispoziție a lui IK."->"Predarea de către Țările de Jos nu putea avea legătură cu pedeapsa complementară și că această instanță nu putea dispune privarea de libertate în vederea executării acestei pedepse, întrucât mandatul european de arestare emis de autoritățile belgiene nu menționa această pedeapsă.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Slovak

Dňa 21. júna a 19. júla 2018 rozhodoval Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Súd pre výkon trestov Antverpy, Belgicko) o treste dohľadu pre IK. V priebehu tohto konania IK tvrdil, že odovzdanie zo strany holandských orgánov sa netýkalo doplňujúceho trestu a že tento súd nemôže na účely výkonu tohto trestu nariadiť odňatie slobody, keďže európsky zatykač vydaný belgickými orgánmi tento trest neuvádzal.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Súd pre výkon trestov Antverpy, Belgicko)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Súd pre výkon trestov Antverpy, Belgicko)"->"Dňa 21. júna 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "Dňa 21. júna 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Dňa 21. júna 2018, 19/07/2018"->"treste dohľadu pre IK"[dir=none];
  "treste dohľadu pre IK"->"Odovzdanie zo strany holandských orgánov sa netýkalo doplňujúceho trestu a že tento súd nemôže nariadiť odňatie slobody, keďže európsky zatykač vydaný belgickými orgánmi tento trest neuvádzal.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Slovenian

Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (sodišče, pristojno za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij, v Antwerpnu, Belgija) je 21. junija in 19. julija 2018 odločalo o izročitvi osebe IK v obravnavo. V tem postopku je zadevna oseba zatrjevala, da se predaja, ki so jo opravili nizozemski organi, ne more nanašati na dodatno kazen in da to sodišče za izvršitev te kazni ne sme odrediti odvzema prostosti, ker v evropskem nalogu za prijetje, ki so ga izdali belgijski organi, ta kazen ni bila navedena.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (sodišče, pristojno za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij, v Antwerpnu, Belgija)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (sodišče, pristojno za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij, v Antwerpnu, Belgija)"->"21. junija 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "21. junija 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21. junija 2018, 19/07/2018"->"Pogojni izpust IK"[dir=none];
  "Pogojni izpust IK"->"Predaja, ki so jo opravili nizozemski organi, ne more nanašati na dodatno kazen in da to sodišče za izvršitev te kazni ne sme odrediti odvzema prostosti, ker v evropskem nalogu za prijetje, ki so ga izdali belgijski organi, ta kazen ni bila navedena.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Finnish

Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpenin rangaistusten täytäntöönpanosta vastaava tuomioistuin, Belgia) käsitteli kysymystä IK:n valvontaan määräämisestä 21.6. ja 19.7.2018. Tässä menettelyssä asianomainen väitti, että kun otetaan huomioon, ettei Belgian viranomaisten antamassa eurooppalaisessa pidätysmääräyksessä lainkaan mainita oheisseuraamusta, Alankomaiden viranomaisten suorittama luovutus ei voi koskea sitä, eikä kyseinen tuomioistuin voi määrätä vapaudenriistoa sen täytäntöönpanemiseksi.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Antwerpenin rangaistusten täytäntöönpanosta vastaava tuomioistuin, Belgia"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Antwerpenin rangaistusten täytäntöönpanosta vastaava tuomioistuin, Belgia"->"21.6. määräys, 19/07/2018";
  "21.6. määräys, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21.6. määräys, 19/07/2018"->"IK:n valvontaan määräämisestä"[dir=none];
  "IK:n valvontaan määräämisestä"->"Kun otetaan huomioon, ettei Belgian viranomaisten antamassa eurooppalaisessa pidätysmääräyksessä lainkaan mainita oheisseuraamusta, Alankomaiden viranomaisten suorittama luovutus ei voi koskea sitä, eikä kyseinen tuomioistuin voi määrätä vapaudenriistoa sen täytäntöönpanemiseksi.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Swedish

Den 21 juni och 19 juli 2018 prövade Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Domstolen för straffverkställighet i Antwerpen, Belgien) IK:s fall. I det förfarandet anförde IK att de nederländska myndigheternas överlämnande inte kunde omfatta den kompletterande påföljden och att den domstolen inte kunde besluta om frihetsberövande som verkställighet av den påföljden, eftersom den inte nämndes i den europeiska arresteringsorder som de belgiska myndigheterna utfärdat.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Domstolen för straffverkställighet i Antwerpen, Belgien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Domstolen för straffverkställighet i Antwerpen, Belgien)"->"Den 21 juni 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "Den 21 juni 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Den 21 juni 2018, 19/07/2018"->"Villkorlig frigivning av IK"[dir=none];
  "Villkorlig frigivning av IK"->"IK att de nederländska myndigheternas överlämnande inte kunde omfatta den kompletterande påföljden och att den domstolen inte kunde besluta om frihetsberövande som verkställighet av den påföljden, eftersom den inte nämndes i den europeiska arresteringsorder som de belgiska myndigheterna utfärdat.."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: English

IK was then surrendered to the Belgian authorities and deprived of liberty. Deprivation of liberty was based on the main sentence, the end of which had been set for 12 August 2018, as well as the additional sentence, namely his conditional release for a 10-year period.
On 21 June and 19 July 2018, the strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Court for the enforcement of custodial sentences, Antwerp, Belgium) sentenced IK to conditional release at its disposal. In those proceedings, IK claimed that it was not lawful for the surrender by Dutch authorities to be based on the additional sentence and that the court could not order deprivation of liberty pursuant to that sentence given that the European arrest warrant issued by the Belgian authorities did not mention it.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
   "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Court for the enforcement of custodial sentences, Antwerp, Belgium)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
   "The Belgian authorities"[shape=doubleoctagon];

   "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Court for the enforcement of custodial sentences, Antwerp, Belgium)"->"Order 21/06/2018, 19/07/2018";
   "Order 21/06/2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
   "Order 21/06/2018, 19/07/2018"->"Conditional release of IK"[dir=none];
   "Conditional release of IK"->"It was not lawful for the surrender by Dutch authorities to be based on the additional sentence and that the court could not order deprivation of liberty pursuant to that sentence given that the European arrest warrant issued by the Belgian authorities did not mention it.";
   "The Belgian authorities"->"Deprived of liberty";
   "Deprived of liberty"->"IK";
   "Deprived of liberty"->"Based on the main sentence, the end of which had been set for 12 August 2018, as well as the additional sentence, namely his conditional release for a 10-year period"[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Bulgarian

След това IK е предаден на белгийските органи и лишен от свобода. Лишаването му от свобода съставлява изпълнение на основното наказание със срок до 12 август 2018 г., както и на допълващото наказание оставяне на разположение за срок от десет години.
На 21 юни и на 19 юли 2018 г. strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (съдът по изпълнението на наказанията Антверпен, Белгия) се произнася по оставянето на разположение на IK. В това производство IK поддържа, че предаването от нидерландските органи няма как да се отнася до допълващото наказание и че посоченият съд не може да постанови лишаване от свобода в изпълнение на това наказание, тъй като европейската заповед за арест, издадена от белгийските органи, не го упоменава.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (съдът по изпълнението на наказанията Антверпен, Белгия)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "белгийските органи"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (съдът по изпълнението на наказанията Антверпен, Белгия)"->"На 21 юни 2018 г., 19/07/2018";
  "На 21 юни 2018 г., 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "На 21 юни 2018 г., 19/07/2018"->"Условно освобождаване на IK"[dir=none];
  "Условно освобождаване на IK"->"IK поддържа, че предаването от нидерландските органи няма как да се отнася до допълващото наказание и че посоченият съд не може да постанови лишаване от свобода в изпълнение на това наказание, тъй като европейската заповед за арест, издадена от белгийските органи, не го упоменава..";
  "белгийските органи"->"лишен от свобода";
  "лишен от свобода"->"IK";
  "лишен от свобода"->"изпълнение на основното наказание със срок до 12 август 2018 г., както и на допълващото наказание оставяне на разположение за срок от десет години."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Spanish

A continuación, el interesado fue entregado a las autoridades belgas e ingresó en prisión. Su privación de libertad se basaba en la condena a la pena principal, que finalizaba el 12 de agosto de 2018, y a la pena accesoria, es decir, la puesta a disposición durante diez años.
Los días 21 de junio y 19 de julio de 2018, el strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de Vigilancia Penitenciaria de Amberes, Bélgica) resolvió sobre la puesta a disposición de IK. En este procedimiento, el interesado alegó que la entrega por las autoridades neerlandesas no podía referirse a la pena accesoria y que ese órgano jurisdiccional no podía ordenar una privación de libertad en ejecución de dicha pena, dado que la orden de detención europea emitida por las autoridades belgas no la mencionaba.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de Vigilancia Penitenciaria de Amberes, Bélgica)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "las autoridades belgas"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de Vigilancia Penitenciaria de Amberes, Bélgica)"->"Los días 21 de junio y 19 de julio de 2018, el strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de Vigilancia Penitenciaria de Amberes, Bélgica) resolvió sobre la puesta a disposición de IK., 19/07/2018";
  "Los días 21 de junio y 19 de julio de 2018, el strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de Vigilancia Penitenciaria de Amberes, Bélgica) resolvió sobre la puesta a disposición de IK., 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Los días 21 de junio y 19 de julio de 2018, el strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Tribunal de Vigilancia Penitenciaria de Amberes, Bélgica) resolvió sobre la puesta a disposición de IK., 19/07/2018"->"Liberación condicional de IK"[dir=none];
  "Liberación condicional de IK"->"El interesado alegó que la entrega por las autoridades neerlandesas no podía referirse a la pena accesoria y que ese órgano jurisdiccional no podía ordenar una privación de libertad en ejecución de dicha pena, dado que la orden de detención europea emitida por las autoridades belgas no la mencionaba..";
  "las autoridades belgas"->"privación de libertad";
  "privación de libertad"->"IK";
  "privación de libertad"->"Se basaba en la condena a la pena principal, que finalizaba el 12 de agosto de 2018, y a la pena accesoria, es decir, la puesta a disposición durante diez años."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Czech

Dotčená osoba byla následně předána belgickým orgánům a vzata do vazby. Toto držení ve vazbě bylo založeno na jejím odsouzení k hlavnímu trestu, jehož konec výkonu byl stanoven na 12. srpna 2018, jakož i k doplňujícímu trestu, který spočíval v podřízení této osoby moci soudu pro výkon trestů na dobu deseti let.
Dne 21. června a 19. července 2018 rozhodl strafuitvoeringsrechtbank te Antwerpen (soud pro výkon trestů v Antverpách, Belgie) o podřízení IK jeho moci. V průběhu tohoto řízení IK tvrdil, že se předání ze strany nizozemských orgánů nemůže vztahovat k doplňkovému trestu a že tento soud nemůže za účelem výkonu tohoto trestu nařídit zbavení osobní svobody, neboť evropský zatýkací rozkaz vydaný belgickými orgány se o něm nezmiňuje.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen soud pro výkon trestů v Antverpách, Belgie"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "belgickým orgánům"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen soud pro výkon trestů v Antverpách, Belgie"->"Dne 21. června 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "Dne 21. června 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Dne 21. června 2018, 19/07/2018"->"Podmíněné uvolnění IK"[dir=none];
  "Podmíněné uvolnění IK"->"Ze strany nizozemských orgánů nemůže vztahovat k doplňkovému trestu a že tento soud nemůže za účelem výkonu tohoto trestu nařídit zbavení osobní svobody, neboť evropský zatýkací rozkaz vydaný belgickými orgány se o něm nezmiňuje..";
  "belgickým orgánům"->"zbavení osobní svobody";
  "zbavení osobní svobody"->"IK";
  "zbavení osobní svobody"->"založeno na jejím odsouzení k hlavnímu trestu, jehož konec výkonu byl stanoven na 12. srpna 2018, jakož i k doplňujícímu trestu, který spočíval v podřízení této osoby moci soudu pro výkon trestů na dobu deseti let."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Danish

Den pågældende blev følgelig overgivet til Belgien og fængslet. Fængslingen skete på grundlag af den idømte hovedstraf, hvis udløb var fastsat til den 12. august 2018, og tillægsstraf, dvs. tilsynet i en periode på ti år.
Den 21. juni og den 19. juli 2018 traf strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (retten i sager vedrørende strafafsoning i Antwerpen, Belgien) afgørelse vedrørende tilsynet med IK. Under denne sag gjorde IK gældende, at den af de nederlandske myndigheder gennemførte overgivelse ikke kunne vedrøre tillægsstraffen, og at retten ikke kunne træffe bestemmelse om frihedsberøvelse med henblik på fuldbyrdelse af denne straf, eftersom den ikke var angivet i den europæiske arrestordre, som de belgiske myndigheder havde udstedt.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (retten i sager vedrørende strafafsoning i Antwerpen, Belgien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "de belgiske myndigheder"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (retten i sager vedrørende strafafsoning i Antwerpen, Belgien)"->"21. juni 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "21. juni 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21. juni 2018, 19/07/2018"->"Betinget frigivelse af IK"[dir=none];
  "Betinget frigivelse af IK"->"Den af de nederlandske myndigheder gennemførte overgivelse ikke kunne vedrøre tillægsstraffen, og at retten ikke kunne træffe bestemmelse om frihedsberøvelse med henblik på fuldbyrdelse af denne straf, eftersom den ikke var angivet i den europæiske arrestordre, som de belgiske myndigheder havde udstedt..";
  "de belgiske myndigheder"->"frihedsberøvelse";
  "frihedsberøvelse"->"IK";
  "frihedsberøvelse"->"På grundlag af den idømte hovedstraf, hvis udløb var fastsat til den 12. august 2018, og tillægsstraf, dvs. tilsynet i en periode på ti år."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: German

IK wurde daraufhin an die belgischen Behörden übergeben und in Haft genommen. Die Inhaftierung beruhte auf seiner Verurteilung zu der Hauptstrafe, deren Ende auf den 12. August 2018 festgesetzt wurde, sowie zu der zusätzlichen Strafe, also seiner Überantwortung an das Strafvollstreckungsgericht für einen Zeitraum von zehn Jahren.
Am 21. Juni und 19. Juli 2018 verhandelte die Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Strafvollstreckungsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien) in der Sache der Überantwortung von IK an das Strafvollstreckungsgericht. IK machte in diesem Verfahren geltend, dass sich die Übergabe durch die niederländischen Behörden nicht auf die zusätzliche Strafe habe beziehen können und die Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Strafvollstreckungsgericht) keinen Freiheitsentzug zur Vollstreckung dieser Strafe anordnen dürfe, da in dem von den belgischen Behörden ausgestellten Europäischen Haftbefehl von der zusätzlichen Strafe keine Rede sei.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Strafvollstreckungsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "die belgischen Behörden"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Strafvollstreckungsgericht Antwerpen, Belgien)"->"Am 21. Juni und 19. Juli 2018 verhandelte die Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen, 19/07/2018";
  "Am 21. Juni und 19. Juli 2018 verhandelte die Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Am 21. Juni und 19. Juli 2018 verhandelte die Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen, 19/07/2018"->"Bedingte Freigabe von IK"[dir=none];
  "Bedingte Freigabe von IK"->"IK machte in diesem Verfahren geltend, dass sich die Übergabe durch die niederländischen Behörden nicht auf die zusätzliche Strafe habe beziehen können und die Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank (Strafvollstreckungsgericht) keinen Freiheitsentzug zur Vollstreckung dieser Strafe anordnen dürfe, da in dem von den belgischen Behörden ausgestellten Europäischen Haftbefehl von der zusätzlichen Strafe keine Rede sei..";
  "die belgischen Behörden"->"Freiheitsentzug";
  "Freiheitsentzug"->"IK";
  "Freiheitsentzug"->"Die Inhaftierung beruhte auf seiner Verurteilung zu der Hauptstrafe, deren Ende auf den 12. August 2018 festgesetzt wurde, sowie zu der zusätzlichen Strafe, also seiner Überantwortung an das Strafvollstreckungsgericht für einen Zeitraum von zehn Jahren."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Estonian

Asjasse puutuv isik anti seejärel üle Belgia ametiasutustele ja ta paigutati kinnipidamisasutusse. Kinnipidamisasutusse paigutamine põhines põhikaristusel, mille täitmine pidi lõppema 12. augustil 2018, kui ka lisakaristusel ehk kümneks aastaks järelevalve alla andmisel.
Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Antwerpeni täitmiskohus) tegi 21. juunil ja 19. juulil 2018 otsuse IK järelevalve alla andmise kohta. Selles menetluses väitis asjasse puutuv isik sisuliselt, et üleandmine Madalmaade ametiasutuste poolt ei saa hõlmata lisakaristust ning et eespool nimetatud kohus ei saanud määrata selle karistuse täideviimist vabaduse võtmise teel, sest Belgia ametiasutuste tehtud Euroopa vahistamismääruses ei olnud seda nimetatud.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Antwerpeni täitmiskohus"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "Belgia ametiasutused"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Antwerpeni täitmiskohus"->"21. juunil, 19/07/2018";
  "21. juunil, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21. juunil, 19/07/2018"->"IK järelevalve alla andmise"[dir=none];
  "IK järelevalve alla andmise"->"Üleandmine Madalmaade ametiasutuste poolt ei saa hõlmata lisakaristust ning et eespool nimetatud kohus ei saanud määrata selle karistuse täideviimist vabaduse võtmise teel, sest Belgia ametiasutuste tehtud Euroopa vahistamismääruses ei olnud seda nimetatud..";
  "Belgia ametiasutused"->"vabaduse võtmise teel";
  "vabaduse võtmise teel"->"IK";
  "vabaduse võtmise teel"->"Kinnipidamisasutusse paigutamine põhines põhikaristusel, mille täitmine pidi lõppema 12. augustil 2018, kui ka lisakaristusel ehk kümneks aastaks järelevalve alla andmisel."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Greek

Στη συνέχεια, ο ενδιαφερόμενος παραδόθηκε στις βελγικές αρχές και ετέθη υπό κράτηση. Η κράτηση αυτή στηριζόταν στην καταδίκη του στην κύρια ποινή, η λήξη της οποίας είχε καθορισθεί στις 12 Αυγούστου 2018, και στην παρεπόμενη ποινή, ήτοι τη θέση του ενδιαφερομένου στη διάθεση του αρμόδιου για την εκτέλεση ποινών δικαστηρίου για διάρκεια δέκα ετών.
Στις 21 Ιουνίου και στις 19 Ιουλίου 2018, το strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο) αποφάνθηκε επί της θέσεως του ΙΚ στη διάθεση του εν λόγω δικαστηρίου. Κατά τη διαδικασία αυτή, ο ενδιαφερόμενος ισχυρίστηκε ότι η παράδοση από τις ολλανδικές αρχές δεν αφορούσε την παρεπόμενη ποινή και ότι το strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας) δεν μπορούσε να επιβάλει στέρηση της ελευθερίας προς εκτέλεση της εν λόγω ποινής, δεδομένου ότι η ποινή αυτή δεν αναγραφόταν στο εκδοθέν από τις βελγικές αρχές ευρωπαϊκό ένταλμα σύλληψης.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο)"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "βελγικές αρχές"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας, Βέλγιο)"->"Στις 21 Ιουνίου 2018, 19/07/2018";
  "Στις 21 Ιουνίου 2018, 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Στις 21 Ιουνίου 2018, 19/07/2018"->"Απελευθέρωση υπό όρους του IK"[dir=none];
  "Απελευθέρωση υπό όρους του IK"->"ο ενδιαφερόμενος ισχυρίστηκε ότι η παράδοση από τις ολλανδικές αρχές δεν αφορούσε την παρεπόμενη ποινή και ότι το strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (αρμόδιο για την εκτέλεση των ποινών δικαστήριο Αμβέρσας) δεν μπορούσε να επιβάλει στέρηση της ελευθερίας προς εκτέλεση της εν λόγω ποινής, δεδομένου ότι η ποινή αυτή δεν αναγραφόταν στο εκδοθέν από τις βελγικές αρχές.";
  "βελγικές αρχές"->"στέρηση της ελευθερίας";
  "στέρηση της ελευθερίας"->"IK";
  "στέρηση της ελευθερίας"->"Η κράτηση αυτή στηριζόταν στην καταδίκη του στην κύρια ποινή, η λήξη της οποίας είχε καθορισθεί στις 12 Αυγούστου 2018, και στην παρεπόμενη ποινή, ήτοι τη θέση του ενδιαφερομένου στη διάθεση του αρμόδιου για την εκτέλεση ποινών δικαστηρίου για διάρκεια δέκα ετών."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: French

L’intéressé a ensuite été remis aux autorités belges et mis en détention. Cette détention était fondée sur sa condamnation à la peine principale, le terme de celle-ci ayant été fixé au 12 août 2018, ainsi qu’à la peine complémentaire, soit sa mise à disposition pour une durée de dix ans.
Les 21 juin et 19 juillet 2018, le strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal de l’application des peines d’Anvers, Belgique) a statué sur la mise à disposition d’IK. Lors de cette procédure, l’intéressé a fait valoir que la remise par les autorités néerlandaises ne pouvait pas porter sur la peine complémentaire et que cette juridiction ne pouvait pas ordonner une privation de liberté en exécution de cette peine, étant donné que le mandat d’arrêt européen émis par les autorités belges ne la mentionnait pas.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen tribunal de l’application des peines d’Anvers, Belgique"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "les autorités belges"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen tribunal de l’application des peines d’Anvers, Belgique"->"Les 21 juin et 19 juillet 2018, le strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal de l’application des peines d’Anvers, Belgique) a statué sur la mise à disposition d’IK., 19/07/2018";
  "Les 21 juin et 19 juillet 2018, le strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal de l’application des peines d’Anvers, Belgique) a statué sur la mise à disposition d’IK., 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "Les 21 juin et 19 juillet 2018, le strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (tribunal de l’application des peines d’Anvers, Belgique) a statué sur la mise à disposition d’IK., 19/07/2018"->"Libération conditionnelle de l'IK"[dir=none];
  "Libération conditionnelle de l'IK"->"L’intéressé a fait valoir que la remise par les autorités néerlandaises ne pouvait pas porter sur la peine complémentaire et que cette juridiction ne pouvait pas ordonner une privation de liberté en exécution de cette peine, étant donné que le mandat d’arrêt européen émis par les autorités belges ne la mentionnait pas..";
  "les autorités belges"->"privation de liberté";
  "privation de liberté"->"IK";
  "privation de liberté"->"Cette détention était fondée sur sa condamnation à la peine principale, le terme de celle-ci ayant été fixé au 12 août 2018, ainsi qu’à la peine complémentaire, soit sa mise à disposition pour une durée de dix ans."[dir=none];
    
}
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2018.
IK.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Hof van Cassatie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a custodial sentence — Substance and form — Article 8(1)(f) — Failure to refer to an additional sentence — Validity — Consequences — Effect on detention.
Case C-551/18 PPU. (2018)
Language: Croatian

Osoba o kojoj je riječ zatim je predana belgijskim tijelima te je smještena u pritvor. Taj se pritvor temeljio na osudi na glavnu kaznu, čiji je predviđeni istek bio 12. kolovoza 2018., kao i na dodatnu kaznu upućivanja u trajanju od deset godina.
Strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen (Sud izvršenja kazne, Antwerpen) odlučivao je 21. lipnja i 19. srpnja 2018. o upućivanju osobe IK. Tijekom tog postupka osoba o kojoj je riječ istaknula je da se predaja nizozemskih tijela ne može odnositi na dodatnu kaznu i da taj sud ne može odrediti oduzimanje slobode radi izvršenja te kazne s obzirom na to da ona nije navedena u europskom uhidbenom nalogu koji su izdala belgijska tijela.

Legal relationship diagram (Graphviz):
digraph {
    rankdir=LR;
    node [shape=box];
    
  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Sud izvršenja kazne, Antwerpen"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "IK"[shape=doubleoctagon];
  "belgijskim tijelima"[shape=doubleoctagon];

  "The strafuitvoeringsrechtbank Antwerpen Sud izvršenja kazne, Antwerpen"->"21. lipnja 2018., 19/07/2018";
  "21. lipnja 2018., 19/07/2018"->"IK";
  "21. lipnja 2018., 19/07/2018"->"Uvjetno puštanje IK"[dir=none];
  "Uvjetno puštanje IK"->"Predaja nizozemskih tijela ne može se odnositi na dodatnu kaznu i da taj sud ne može odrediti oduzimanje slobode radi izvršenja te kazne s obzirom na to da ona nije navedena u europskom uhidbenom nalogu koji su izdala belgijska tijela..";
  "belgijskim tijelima"->"oduzimanje slobode";
  "oduzimanje slobode"->"IK";
  "oduzimanje slobode"->"Temeljio na osudi na glavnu kaznu, čiji je predviđeni istek bio 12. kolovoza 2018., kao i na dodatnu kaznu upućivanja u trajanju od deset godina."[dir=none];
    
}