milesbutler/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 05/16/2015 about Credit reporting () with Experian Information Solutions Inc. (NJ).
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Account status

Complaint: I recently received my FICO score from Experian. It stated that a person 's score can either go up or down with this new FICO system. I looked down at my score ... .it went from XXXX down to XXXX ... XXXX POINTS! I called Experian. They told me that my recent charge of {$8000.00} on my XXXX caused it. I told them that I had paid the whole amount in full, and that my total credit allowance is {$30000.00} anyway. I only used up XXXX % of my credit limit, paid it in full, and now I am being penalized for it! I have never in all my years paid ANY bill late. Please tell me how to proceed to get my score back up to where it should be ... XXXX. As you can see above, Experian 's response was " final ''. I spoke to many people there, and no one ( even supervisors ) would help me rectify this situation. Your help would be so much appreciated. I am a XXXX widow ; I know if my husband were still alive, he would be reeling on his heels right now! He was a bank representative and very professional. He would never have treated his clients this way. 
Thanking you in advance.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 12/22/2015 about Mortgage (Other mortgage) with SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. (CA).
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Complaint: By failing to adhere to both California law and the rules under CFPB, The party ( ies ) complained of in my initial complaint are not compliant with rules regarding dual tracking. The Parties are " covered '' under both California Homeowner 's Bill of Rights and the CFPB 's strict guidelines. 

I have a valid and complete loan modification package that has been acknowledged as received and no notice of deficiency of documentation has been received by me. I just received another Notice of Trustee during the pendency of my application. 

The Parties have also failed to respond to the initial complaint with competent and reliable evidence that supports all facts contained within all recorded title documents that were used against my contract rights. Specifically, the assignment ( s ) of deed of trust to an un-verified entity, Notice of Default, Notice of Trustee Sale. No authenticated evidence has been offered by the offending Parties by any person with personal, first-hand knowledge of those facts. I am not in default to an unknown, un-authenticated party that is currently in my chain of title without competent evidence to support the beneficial interest.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 06/21/2016 about Debt collection (Mortgage) with SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. (GA).
Issue: Taking/threatening an illegal action
Sub-issue: Seized/Attempted to seize property

Complaint: RE : previous complaint # XXXX 1. This Complaint is filed pursuant XXXX - Unfair Practices, and is directed specifically at non-compliance by XXXX. and Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. hereafter SPS Inc.. 

2. This complaint is related to a previous compliant recently filed with the CFPB, complaint # XXXX on XXXX XXXX, 2016. The complaint was submitted by the CFPB to XXXX. and SPS Inc. on XXXX XXXX, 2016. I receive notification on XXXX XXXX, 2016 that the parties had in fact received notification or communications form CFPB on my behalf. However, XXXX. and SPS Inc. failed to immediately stop all collection actions as required by FDCPA statute. 

3. Whereas, A non-judicial foreclosure advertisement of a SALE UNDER POWER of our property had already been schedule for XXXX XXXX, 2016, as reported in previous CFPB complaint # XXXX on XXXX XXXX, 2016 and was recorded and published with XXXX XXXX Georgia XXXX ( Daily Report Public Notice paper ) on XXXX XXXX, 2016 by XXXX. at the request of SPS Inc. See EXHIBIT-A. 

4. Please be advised that XXXX. and SPS Inc. is violating the FDCPA by failing to cancel or otherwise stop all collection action after receipt of the complaint from CFPB, including any pending non-judicial foreclosure scale action. they have failed to give the required good faith and fair dealing notification of cancellation as required. 

5. XXXX. and SPS after receiving affirmative communications form CFPB on my behalf, they are continuing to communicating with us regarding a debt by post card through third parties urging us to modify a purported loan. 

6. XXXX and SPS, after receiving affirmative communications form CFPB on my behalf is continuing to make threats through XXXX Mail to take action that can not legally be taken. 

Conculsion I now ask this agency to issue an administrative DEMAND, compelling SPS Inc. and XXXX to comply with FDCPA requirement to cease collection in accordance with the Statute. and provide evidence thereof.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 11/25/2016 about Credit card () with U.S. BANCORP (MA).
Issue: Rewards

Complaint: BAIT AND SWITCH CREDIT CARD OFFER BY Fidelity Investments & Elan Financial Services Took advantage of a Visa card offer on Fidelity web site noting a 2 % rewards credit card, coupled with a XXXX point ( {$100.00} value ). Account opened without issue, card received, but never received the XXXX bonus. Several attempts to correct via written correspondence and two telephone calls with Elan Financial pushes everything back to a 'live ' phone call. Final call made on XX/XX/2016 to Elan Fin @ XXXX, spoke with a supervisor named XXXX, and she noted as their was no promotional code attached by the system with my account opening, I would not be receiving the promotional offer. The offer, if still up on the Fidelity investments website, is at this URL : XXXX. I was still active as of XX/XX/2016 @ XXXX. When asked why they ca n't research what promotional offer was actively run on the Fidelity Investments web site at the time the account was open, the rep kept referring to the account opening code statement ... I also know that apparently other customers are having a similar issue with not getting the appropriate credit ... This is a classic example of Bait and Switch if I 've ever seen one.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 03-11-2016 about Bank account or service (Checking account) with First Data Corporation (OH).
Issue: Making/receiving payments, sending money

Complaint: Over a period of several years, I have made many purchases at an office supply retailer, mostly paying for them with a credit card. On XXXX XXXX, 2016 I made a purchase, costing a little more than {$150.00}, using a personal check. To my great surprise the cashier advised me that my check was " denied '' and gave me no explanation. There was plenty more in my checking account to cover the cost and I have never written a bad check. I used a credit card and the transaction went through without a problem. The next day, out of great concern for why my check was denied, I returned to the retailer and spoke to the assistant manager. He was very professional and immediately offered to look into it. He made a phone call, asked me a number of questions and I answered them. He was advised that my check was " referred, '' not " denied, and was advised to tell me to call an XXXX number to learn why my check was " referred. '' Anxious to learn about my " problem, '' I returned home and called the number. The company was TeleCheck, unfortunately, a recorded voice answered and proceeded to ask me a number of personal questions, including the dollar amount of my purchase, date of the purchase, and entire line of data at the bottom of my check. After repeating this process at least three times, I was told that someone would be with me in a moment. Following about 10 minutes of silence, I got a busy signal and I hung up. I re-dialed, and went through the process again. The voice finally advised with words I believe were : " ... ( a few short words I do not recall followed by : ) sorry for the inconvenience. '' and disconnected. I had no opportunity to speak to a human being and was left wondering about my checking account, my credit rating, etc. I then XXXX " TeleCheck '' and learned from numerous, written, customer " complaints '' that they are a fraud. I made copies to pass on to the retailer and my banker, both of whom thanked me for the information. My big concern is that I have not been told why my check was " declined, '' initially, and then was " referred. '' Another big concern has to do with the company, TeleCheck. This is a company that has been in the security business a long time and is now regarded by many innocent customers as being a fraud. From what has happened to me ... providing the recorded voice with some very personal information about me and my checking account ... I am extremely suspect as to TeleCheck 's intentions. I can not help but believe that this is an attempt by TeleCheck to steal my identity information and make it available to others at a profit to themselves. After a long history of customer abuse, I do not understand why this company is allowed to continue doing business! I trust that you will look into this matter as soon as possible and will get back to me regarding the next step in this complaint by me. Thank you very much.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 02/15/2016 about Mortgage (Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)) with JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. (FL).
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Complaint: I am very sorry but I could not locate how to reopen a claim. This is claim # XXXX. The last regular transaction was speaking on the phone with XXXX XXXX in the Executive Offices when she assured me that the loan was a charge off. I am now being called almost daily to on this and they say they do not see the charge off occurred. I do not feel I should have to start over with this process when Chase has clearly stated that my house qualifies for no other option due to condition and value. 
My computer completely crashed and I lost dates, etc that I was keeping track of the phone calls so I am at a loss as to my next step. Please help me, if you can. 
Thank you, XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 08/13/2015 about Credit reporting () with TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC. (IA).
Issue: Credit monitoring or identity protection
Sub-issue: Billing dispute

Complaint: On XXXX/XXXX/2015, I utilized the trial membership that Transunion offered for a seven day period. I notified Transunion through email that I am not interested in utilizing there product. I also notified Transunion verbally on XXXX/XXXX/2015 that I am not interested in this product due to information was not reporting accurately or being updated in a timely manner. In which I received email confirmation on XXXX/XXXX/2015 and XXXX/XXXX/2015. That the cancellation was received. on XXXX/XXXX/2015, a charge for XXXX was drafted from my checking account. In which I contacted Transunion on XXXX/XXXX/2015 or XXXX/XXXX/2015 and requested a refund. ( the reason for the delay in noticing this matter is My job transferred and I moved XXXX hours away ) So my focus was on packing and moving. So on XXXX/XXXX/2015 or XXXX/XXXX/2015, I called and spoke with a representative regarding my concerns. The representative stated that the proceeds would be credited back to my account within 5 business days. I contacted Transunion on XXXX/XXXX/2015 regarding the same issue, and the representative ( XXXX? ) was rude, unprofessional, and argumentative. I immediately escalated this matter to a manager. The manager advised me that it takes XXXX days for my proceeds to be refunded and acknowledged that I did submit my cancellation. I advised the manager today is XXXX/XXXX/2015, I believe the 30 day window has passed. The manager stated that I should contact my bank, I advised the manager that I will be filing a complaint, because it not the issue of XXXX, its the matter of me complying with the terms and conditions of the trial period and Transunion took it upon themselves to take money out of my checking account after it was communicated in writing that no authorization has been granted to take money out of my account. Also that Transunion acknowledged the cancellation and proceeded to withdraw proceeds out of my account. This is not a banking issue, this is just wrong.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 12/13/2016 about Consumer Loan (Vehicle loan) with GENERAL MOTORS FINANCIAL COMPANY, INC. (AP).
Issue: Managing the loan or lease

Complaint: First I am a retired XXXX XXXX XXXX, I am a XXXX. I have worked XXXX government. Currently I am at XXXX.My wife and I bought a XXXX financed through GM Financial.. In XXXX we requested a release letter to ship our car to XXXX. We have another car that we shipped, financed by XXXX. We shipped this car. GM refused to give us clearance authorization to ship XXXX out of country even though we have afull coverage.insurance through XXXX. GM denied our request. Currently our XXXX is in our garage at our house in XXXX. I have tried many times to get them to authorize shipping car. e are in good standing with payments, we are ahead in payments auto bank draft. Please help

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 07-11-2016 about Student loan (Non-federal student loan) with Navient Solutions, LLC. (CA).
Issue: Dealing with my lender or servicer
Sub-issue: Having problems with customer service

Complaint: I was first informed to set up an account with XXXX XXXX and my parents were paying a monthly loan to them on my account. We have been paying them since XXXX XXXX XXXX. We were not given any monthly request but we continued to send money to my account. When I called in after 2 years of paying the monthly payments, XXXX XXXX said that they no longer do student loans and have transferred that over to Navient. We were not notified of this at all. 

The worse thing is, that they somehow link my account to another person 's account. Thus, I no longer have an account and have been paying this other person 's account. I called in asking for a refund. We faxed our bank statements to Navient in order to verify and support our refund. We submitted the fax papers on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. We were given a refund back but not the entire amount. Navient 's claim was that they did not know where the rest of the money went. They held off our refund request. I called in continuously asking what is going on, their response was, " our research team is still doing work on this issue. '' They claimed that they would call back after a certain amount of days in order to inform me of the situation, but they did not. 

This company is lacking in its customer service. I was on the phone for about an 1 hour and 40 minutes. I always have to explain my issue to the recipient because they would not give me a direct line to a manager/supervisor. That wastes another 20 minutes or more of my time. 

They claim that they will give the rest of the refund by this Thursday, XXXX XXXX XXXX. I do not believe it. But we will see. 

I am complaining about their customer service, their productivity, switching my accounts, and their lack of communication.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 10-07-2017 about Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports (Credit reporting) with Experian Information Solutions Inc. (FL).
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account status incorrect

Complaint: I have duplicate XXXX XXXX accounts reporting on my XXXX and experian reports, these have been deleted by XXXX XXXX with XXXX per XXXX XXXX request but are still showing on other 2 credit reporting agencies, please delete. I am.no longer liable for these accounts and do not have a contract with XXXX XXXX, attached deleted records and you will see the XXXX XXXX account numbers also. XXXX XXXX account numbers are attached also. Please delete asap

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 12-01-2016 about Credit reporting () with TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC. (CA).
Issue: Credit reporting company's investigation
Sub-issue: No notice of investigation status/result

Complaint: I am filing this complaint because Transunion has ignored my request to provide me with the documents that their company supposedly has on file that was used to verify the accounts and inquiries that I have disputed. Being that they have now gone 30 days and STILL can not verify these under accounts or inquiries under Section 611 ( 5 ) ( A ) of the FCRA they are required to promptly delete ALL information which can not be verified that I have disputed. Please resolve this matter as soon as possible as I am prepared to take legal action if this is not resolved.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 03/27/2015 about Credit card () with CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION (NY).
Issue: Delinquent account

Complaint: Capital One keeps reporting a charge off that is not mine to the XXXX credit bureaus.The credit bureaus respond to my disputes that the item has been verified.I conacted Capital One directly and asked them to provide with proof that the charged off account was indeed mine.They have failed to respond with any proof of the validity of the debt andare not in compliance with the fair credit reporting laws.So what do I do to resolve this issue.This mistake is affecting my credit score for almost 7 years and stopping me getting a car loan and a mortgage.The payments would be too high.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 10-07-2015 about Debt collection (Mortgage) with BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (MD).
Issue: Taking/threatening an illegal action
Sub-issue: Seized/Attempted to seize property

Complaint: I have recently found information that XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX as individuals and Representative ( s ) or Agent ( s ) of XXXX XXXX XXXX have submitting false evidence under the penalty of perjury into the Circuit Court of XXXX XXXX County. XXXX XXXX XXXX has foreclosed on the subject property in XX/XX/XXXX using the name of the original XXXX and a license number that expired in XX/XX/XXXX.XXXX XXXX XXXX of XXXX under the penalty of perjury affirmed that the purchase of the subject property was fairly sold and bought at a fair price. The subject property was purchased by XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX and auctioned by Auctioneer XXXX XXXX XXXX for XXXX. I have reason to believe the bidding and auction of the subject property were rigged by XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX of XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX. Sworn Affidavits filed in case number XXXX to also include the Assignment of Deed of Trust, the Deed of Appointment of Substitute Trustee and the Writ of Possession and Eviction filed by the Defendant XXXX XXXX XXXX of XXXX are in fact willful and deceptive violations of 15 U.S.C. 1692e ( 13 ), 15 U.S.C. 1692f ( 6 ), 15 U.S.C. 1692e ( 4 ) and 18 U.S.C. 1621. There are many irregularities in the assignment of DEED OF TRUST and the process in which such DEED OF TRUST was allegedly transferred, conveyed, assigned, sold, recorded, etc. As asserted, these defects left the foreclosing entities without authenticating documentation to the property and without the authority to foreclose.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 06-06-2016 about Payday loan () with CURO Intermediate Holdings (TN).
Issue: Can't contact lender

Complaint: Speedy Cash made a hard inquiry on my credit report with XXXX. 
I did not authorized anyone employed by XXXX XXXX to make an inquiry and view my credit report. They have violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act Section 1681b ( c ). They are not legally entitled to make the inquiry. This is a serious breach of my privacy rights.

Company response to consumer: Closed
Consumer complaint received 06/26/2017 about Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports (Credit reporting) with Navient Solutions, LLC. (FL).
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account information incorrect

Complaint: My student loan creditor, NAVIENT is reporting multiple periods of late payments for student loan accounts that were placed in forbearance retroactively, but were never updated to CRAs as required by The Fair Credit Report Act Section 623 ( a ) ( 2 ). <P/>The US Department of Education states that retroactive forbearance acknowledges a period where no payments are due. Therefore negative credit history must be removed/updated. This duty to update extends to all student loan accounts reported to CRAs, regardless of whether they were accurate at one point. The Fair Credit Report Act Section 623 ( a ) ( 2 ) requires that the furnisher both update and correct information submitted to the CRA. Reporting is to be updated on my credit report to reflect a forbearance status for the months indicated below. <P/>( 8 accounts ) Loans were placed in forbearance on XX/XX/XXXX and retroactively backdated to cover the past due month of XX/XX/XXXX. <P/>Loans were placed in forbearance on XX/XX/XXXX and retroactively backdated to cover past due periods of XX/XX/XXXX - XX/XX/XXXX. <P/>Loans were placed in forbearance on XX/XX/XXXXand retroactively backdated to cover past due periods of XX/XX/XXXX - XX/XX/XXXX.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 09/14/2016 about Debt collection (Medical) with GLA Collection Company, Inc. (IN).
Issue: Disclosure verification of debt
Sub-issue: Not given enough info to verify debt

Complaint: GLA Collection Service added debts to my credit report in which I had no clue what they were for until I called them. I also called the original creditor, XXXX XXXX in which they refused to give me printouts of the original debts and when they occurred, what the insurance paid ( or if ), stating it was against the law for them to give me that information and that they forwarded everything to GLA. I know that is an outright farce because they are required to keep billing information for no less than ten years. XXXX XXXX also sent me bills for a XXXX XXXX XXXX and at the time I was XXXX XXXX XXXX. They are refusing to cooperate with me and my insurance. My insurance actually sent GLA a letter stating that XXXX is investigating the debts and that GLA needs to " forebear '' any debts until the investigation is complete. 

The address for GLA is : GLA XXXX XXXX XXXXT XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX The address for XXXX is : XXXX XXXX BILLING DEPARTMENT XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation