milesbutler/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 01/28/2017 about Credit card () with CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION (ID).
Issue: Other

Complaint: After making arrangements with other cards ; I went to the account that I hv filed regarding both Capital One cards ( XXXX ) with you already. I saw that Capital One has not responded yet. After calling them on XXXX XXXX, XXXX and speaking to XXXX ( Collections Manager in Virginia ) did not respond to allow my account to be charged off. Let me explain : I spoke to XXXX in the collections to set up payment arrangements and she documented my account and stated I can pay {$20.00} month starting on XXXX XXXX, XXXX via mail, bill pay, XXXX XXXX, or XXXX. I was transferred to XXXX ( Collections Manager ) to speak about why they have not responded on here. XXXX saw the notes on my account to set up a payment arrangement and he stated that if I did not pay {$25.00} in eights days ; the account will be charged off. I explained I already set up payment arrangements in this department with XXXX and he stated I am unable to wait until XXXX XXXX. I explained to him that I called Capital One starting in XXXX XXXX, I mailed a letter XXXX XXXX, XXXX and Capital One has yet to enroll me in a hardship program like I asked. I explained to him that I could mail {$20.00} preferably but I can mail {$25.00} on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. XXXX stated my payment wo n't make it in time and the account will be charged off. I am requesting your department to investigate Capital One for purposely not enrolling me in a hardship program ( which would have allowed me to make low montly payments, prevented my account from being charged off, and I would have been on a regular monthly payment plan to pay off my cards ) I am also requesting that your office investigate Capital One for not responding to my original complaint ( Case number : XXXX ) so that my account can go in charge off status to lower my credit score. Capital One did this out of retaliation because I filed with you. They should not be allowed to prevent any consumer to make payment arrangements under hardship reasons ( I would qualify ) especially when I called before it was delinquent. When I called Capital One ; I was less than 2 months late.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 10/31/2016 about Credit reporting () with Experian Information Solutions Inc. (CA).
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Account status

Complaint: The credit reporting agencies will eliminate the reporting of debts that did not arise from a contract or agreement by the consumer to pay, such as tickets or fines, '' XXXX director XXXX XXXX XXXX wrote. " Experian has already submitted a cease and desist notification to XXXX for all credit reporting transactions listed as unacceptable data ... Examples include, but are not limited to : towing charges, vehicle storage fees, parking and traffic tickets/fines, toll road fines/fees. '' In XXXX, the XXXX credit reporting agencies informed debt collectors like XXXX that they were to stop sending notices of unpaid red light camera citations by XXXX XXXX, 2016. 

" Do not report debt that did not arise from a contract or agreement to pay, including, but not limited to, certain fines, tickets and other assessments, '' the credit reporting agency document explained. " For example, library fees or fines, parking tickets, speeding tickets, and court fees or fines. '' Motorists with existing red light camera, speed camera or parking ticket debt on their credit report can expect that their records will be cleared. Under the legal settlement, consumers have new rights to dispute incorrect items on their report. 

I have XXXX paid parking tickets on my experience credit report that should be removed.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 08/18/2016 about Bank account or service (Checking account) with REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION (FL).
Issue: Problems caused by my funds being low

Complaint: Last weekend I went to visit my wife and child in VA. While I was there I rented a car. The rental company put a " hold '' on {$100.00} in my bank account. I had the car from late Friday night ( XXXX ) until early Monday morning ( XXXX ). Over the weekend I used my debit card several times for smaller items, most under {$10.00}. On Monday when I returned the car, the company put all the money back in the account except for {$37.00}. On Monday and the Tuesday following, I was hit with several overdraft charges even though when the charges came through there was money in the bank to cover the purchases. In total I was hit with XXXX overdraft charges totaling {$280.00} even though when the bills hit my account there was money in my account to cover the debits. 
The bank 's justification for charging me the overdrafts was that at the moment the card was ran the money was n't in the account. 
My question is how is it legal for the bank to charge overdrafts on me when there is money in the account when the debit comes in? I just want to be clear, there was no check deposit or anything like that, it was just a release of money the car rental was not using back into my account.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 03-04-2018 about Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports (Credit reporting) with TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC. (FL).
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account information incorrect

Complaint: This account is paid and needs to be removed

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 04/24/2016 about Credit reporting () with TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC. (NY).
Issue: Improper use of my credit report
Sub-issue: Received marketing offer after opted out

Complaint: I only allowed XXXX authorization to pull hard inquiry, not XXXX or XXXX. Please remove these XXXX inquiries.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 11-10-2017 about Debt collection (Federal student loan debt) with Navient Solutions, LLC. (PA).
Issue: Communication tactics
Sub-issue: Frequent or repeated calls

Complaint: I have consolidated my student debt with the XXXX XXXX XXXX. I have notified Navient, and XXXX XXXX that I have consolidated, and they continue to call me an average of XXXX times per day. I have XXXX asked that they stop calling me, but the calling will not stop.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 08/15/2017 about Credit card or prepaid card (Store credit card) with CITIBANK, N.A. (OH).
Issue: Fees or interest
Sub-issue: Problem with fees

Complaint: I have a sears credit card. I canceled the account XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX. I have had the account XXXX XXXX since XX/XX/XXXX. I asked for a refund but no answer back from them. It is provided by Citibank N.A. I have canceled account care with other credit cards and received credit on my accounts. I was never told that if I canceled account XXXX with Citibank I would not receive credit on my account. Thank you XXXX XXXX at XXXX.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 10/28/2015 about Debt collection (Other (i.e. phone, health club, etc.)) with First Advantage LNS Inc. (OH).
Issue: Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt is not mine

Complaint: I received a final bill from XXXX XXXX that was not correct. I disputed the charges and after almost 2 weeks of email correspondences with their collections manager, I finally received notification from their accounting department stating that they found their error and they would be sending a refund check on XXXX/XXXX/15. Included in this email was a notice from the accountant to the collection manager to remove my name from their collection agency. On Friday, XXXX XXXX I received a phone call from the National Credit Audit Corporation threatening to report my disputed balance if full payment was n't received by XXXX/XXXX/15. I tried to explain the situation and that I had an email confirming that this had been resolved to which he responded that unless he received something directly from XXXX XXXX he would pursue collections. XXXX properties collections department, who I was directly reporting to, is closed on Fridays so I emailed them explaining the situation and then have tried to call them repeatedly on Monday XXXX XXXX XXXX and Tuesday ( XXXX ) and can not get a response even after leaving multiple messages to multiple staff. When I could n't get a hold of XXXX XXXX, I contacted the collection agency to update them on my actions and at that time the representative working my account implied that I was being untruthful and again threatened to pursue collection if I did n't pay the account balance immediately. I feel that this has been turned over to collection in error. My final bill from XXXX XXXX that I was originally disputing was n't due until XXXX/XXXX/15 so even if I did n't have an email from them telling me that they found their error, I still would n't be delinquent to the point of being turned over for collection and having it reported to the credit bureau. As of this date, I have not received any mail correspondence from the collection agency which I feel does n't qualify as proper notification of a debt due. If XXXX XXXX would respond to my emails and numerous phone messages I feel this would be resolved quickly and easily by a call to the collection agency informing them that I have a zero balance due.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 05/30/2015 about Credit reporting () with EQUIFAX, INC. (MN).
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Information is not mine

Complaint: I am a victim of identity theft and have fraudulent accounts listed on my Equifax credit report that do not belong to me. I have sent numerous letters and police reports to Equifax disputing the inaccurate information listed on my report and I received numerous letters from Equifax informing the disputed information is accurate. I want the following fraudulent accounts listed on my Equifax credit report removed immediately from my credit report : XXXX XXXX XXXX, Account Number : # XXXX XXXX, Account Number : # XXXX XXXX XXXX, Account Number : # XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Account Number : # XXXX XXXX Account Number : # XXXX XXXX, Account Number : # XXXX Collection XXXX, Account Number : # XXXX Of XXXX, Account Number : # XXXX XXXX XXXX Account Number : # XXXX XXXX Bank USA XXXX XXXX Account Number : # XXXX BankXXXX XXXX XXXX Account Number : # XXXX XXXX XXXX, Account Number : # XXXX Loan XXXX XXXX XXXX Account Number : # XXXX Bank/GLELSI, Account Number : # XXXX Bank, Account Number : # XXXX XXXX, Account XXXX : # XXXX XXXX. XXXX, Account Number : # XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 10-12-2015 about Credit reporting () with TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC. (GA).
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Account status

Complaint: I have made all payments on time to XXXX XXXX XXXX. However, this month when reported my credit score dropped XXXX points as a result of late payment. When reviewing the payment history, all sections are in good standing, however, it says I am 39-50 days late in that section as well. I am current with all payments, I have NOT missed or been late on a payment.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 12/16/2016 about Debt collection (Medical) with ProCollect, Inc (TX).
Issue: Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt is not mine

Complaint: I have no knowledge of this account

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 10-04-2017 about Mortgage (Conventional home mortgage) with Specialized Loan Servicing LLC (IL).
Issue: Trouble during payment process

Complaint: I have been trying to have a PMI payment cancelled with XXXX, after my mortgage was resold to them at the beginning of the year. Currently, PMI is still being taken out of escrow despite my mortgage now at 76 % XXXX. When at 80 %, they required a {$500.00} appraisal on the property when we had refinanced 6 months earlier. This itself is ridiculous as a quick mls search in area within the last XXXX mos is sufficient to see the value of home had not declined. A full reappraisal in such a short time period is absurd, and an abuse of fair reading of the law. 

As the appraisal cost was more than continuing PMI payments until reaching 78 %, I waited. We received a letter in XXXX saying PMI would be cancelled automatically, as required by law, at 78 %. When I realized PMI was still being charged after hitting 78 % i called XXXX, only to have a representative try and tell me I had to hit 78 % of the balance of the loan when refinanced, not the value of the loan, a ridiculous lie. 

XXXX minutes of phone arguing eventually had them tell me I must submit a written request to remove PMI XXXX despite this in explicit violation of the law ). I did. XXXX months later, I am still trying to get the PMI payments halted.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 04/18/2016 about Debt collection (Other (i.e. phone, health club, etc.)) with Diversified Consultants, Inc. (FL).
Issue: Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt was paid

Complaint: They say that I had a contract with XXXX which I had taken care of my obligation. I keep telling them to send me a signed contract which there is none. I cancelled my service after over 12 years of service. They call me everday and several times a day.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 12/23/2016 about Credit reporting () with EQUIFAX, INC. (GA).
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Public record

Complaint: I had outstanding state taxes due to the Georgia XXXX I ( through my attorney ) did an offer and compromise to settle all of my outstanding taxes. I received a stamped release from the XXXX. The Equifax credit bureau is telling me they do n't take off tax liens even if they were paid. I 'm attaching the Georgia State Tax Lien XXXX stamped, signed, and date XXXX XXXX, 2016, stating the {$1500.00}, has been paid, satisfied and ordered cancelled from record. I 'm attaching my Equifax Credit Report for you to see it is still being reported. When I spoke with them, I was told nothing can be done.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 03/13/2017 about Mortgage (Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)) with MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC (NV).
Issue: Application, originator, mortgage broker

Complaint: Both the trustee of my mortgage and the investor/holder of my mortgage have committed numerous mortgage related violations, some criminal and have both reached settlements with the Department of Justice for such. Even though both have consent agreements mandating homeowner relief with modifications, both have refused to allow a modification. 
XXXX is the trustee of my mortgage note for the Master servicer Morgan Stanley via XXXX XXXX. 
Both XXXX and Morgan Stanley have entered into agreements with the Department of Justice and various other federal and state regulatory bodies to settle and plea guilty to their criminal actions for various mortgage related crimes. 

In XX/XX/XXXX the Department of Justice announced that XXXX entered a guilty plea for XXXX 's criminal actions in manipulating the Libor rate. 
The Libor rate was used to establish the interest rate on my mortgage. This in and of itself should make my loan, " the fruit of illegal activity '' null and void. 

In XX/XX/XXXX the Department of Justice announced that Morgan Stanly was settling claims against them in the amount of XXXX dollars for mortgage related/issues and fraud. 

On XX/XX/XXXX The Department of justice announced that XXXX was entering into a civil agreement of XXXX dollars, of which XXXX is for relief to aid consumers harmed by its unlawful conduct ; specifically XXXX will provide loan modifications, including loan forgiveness and forbearance to distressed and underwater homeowners throughout the country. I am one of the consumers mentioned above! 

Morgan Stanley and XXXX through their sub servicer XXXX have refused to allow me to modify my mortgage even though the mortgage is predicated on XXXX 's and Morgan Stanley 's criminal and illegal behavior that both have pled guilty to paying XXXX of dollars in fines and both have been mandated and agreed to offer consumer relief through loan modification. 

On XX/XX/XXXX, just three days after XXXX entered into the agreement with the DOJ, XXXX filed for foreclosure on my mortgage even though I have been trying to modify my mortgage for many years and have been repeatedly told that " the investor does not allow modification for my loan ''. Considering their guilty plea for their criminal actions, can they even continue to manage this trust? 
I want XXXX and Morgan Stanley to abide by the respective agreements that they entered into with the DOJ and various other federal and state regulatory bodies and fulfill their obligation to offer consumer relief. 
Please modify my illegal loan.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 07-07-2015 about Mortgage (Conventional fixed mortgage) with TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC. (PA).
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Complaint: This complaint is against TransUnion Credit Bureau and related to complaint # XXXX. TransUnion is reporting from my mortgage servicing company XXXX XXXX XXXX a Derogatory status. This is inaccurate and seriously wrong status. My loan has never been delinquent or not in current status with XXXX XXXX XXXX. I have submitted documentation with complaint XXXX. This inaccurate status has impacted my credit report and caused me harm. Additionally, it is violation of the CFPB laws.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 09-07-2017 about Mortgage (Conventional home mortgage) with QUICKEN LOANS, INC. (TX).
Issue: Closing on a mortgage

Complaint: I applied for a cash out refinance on X/X/17. I stated my home was worth {$200000.00}, but the appraisal came back at {$190000.00}. Originally, the loan amount would have been {$160000.00} and we were going to pay off four credit cards in the amounts of {$9100.00}, {$6500.00}, {$5300.00}, and {$4700.00} and receive {$2900.00} in cash back. After the low appraisal, the amount was changed to {$150000.00} and only three credit cards to be paid off. I spoke to XXXX, loan officer, after the appraisal was received. He stated not to worry because I would be getting an escrow refund for around {$3500.00}. When the redisclosure package was uploaded it showed the three credit cards being paid off and {$5800.00} in cash back. I spoke with XXXX, who said I would get {$5800.00} cash back and then a refund a couple weeks later for escrow in the amount of {$3700.00}. I asked if he was sure ... ..he restated it. When I got a call to set up closing, I asked about the numbers again. The agent on the phone said that I was not getting an escrow refund, because it was used to pay down the amount owed on the home. I called XXXX  again. He told me " not to worry '' and he " did n't know what they were talking about '' and that he was looking at it on his screen. He said he would get it fixed. When I got another call to close, I was told I was getting {$2100.00} cash back and an escrow refund. I called XXXX  again. He emphatically apologized and told me he would get his director to fix this issue. He again stated I would get {$5800.00} cash back and an escrow refund in the amount of {$3700.00}. XXXX called me on X/X/17 and said that he was wrong and apologized. I asked him to make this right and he said that he would have his manager call me. Today, I got a call from the escalation department ( XXXX ). When I explained the issue, and asked to make it right and issue a credit in the amount of {$3700.00}. He said that Quicken was not a used car lot and that a credit in that amount " would not happen ''. I asked to speak with her supervisor and am waiting on a call back. XXXX was very rude and his tone quickly changed when speaking with me. I really doubt that Quicken will go bankrupt if they issue a credit to make this right. I am not in the wrong. I explained everything every step of the way and was mis-led during this process. This is not right.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 01-05-2018 about Vehicle loan or lease (Loan) with American Credit Acceptance, LLC (WV).
Issue: Struggling to pay your loan
Sub-issue: Lender trying to repossess or disable the vehicle

Complaint: American Credit Acceptance is the loan company. First problem is the interest rate was 25 % and the issue is i bought the vehicle from XXXX with ACA as the lender with {$1000.00} down. The vehicle broke down within a month and I had to put over {$1500.00} into the truck to get a new rear end in the vehicle. After that I had the payments for the truck I spoke to them about it got a 3 month break, yet I found out a few months after that back in XX/XX/XXXX that the truck would not pass inspection without getting a new bed of the truck which cost $ 1500- {$3000.00}. On top of the repair bill, the monthly truck payment, as well as trying to get it to be pass state inspection I was struggling. I spoke to a lady at ACA about trading the vehicle in so i was told to wait on making the payment after XXXX. So today XX/XX/XXXX they Repoed the truck and told me I needed {$1400.00} to get it back along with storage fees, etc. Also, if i could not afford to get the vehicle back I was informed that if the truck sales at the auction I would still have to pay the difference even though I paid over {$2000.00} to get the trucked fixed to get it to run due to being sold a lemon from XXXX and the ACA. When I went to trade the vehicle in i was told I needed to have {$2000.00} down in order to get loan with trading in the vehicle.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation