Consumer complaint received 05/28/2017 about Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports (Credit reporting) with LEXISNEXIS (CA).
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Investigation took more than 30 days

Complaint: LexisNexis Consumer Service shows a Tax Lien on my credit report. I do not have ANY Tax Lien. I DISPUTED the information with LexisNexis Consumer Service on XXXX XXXX, 2017 via USPS certified mail return receipt. Asking them to VALIDATE the information in accordance with the Fair Debt Reporting Act. I have not heard from LexisNexis Consumer Service, nor did they mark this information ad DISPUTED. I sent another letter dated XXXX XXXX, 2017 via USPS certified mail return receipt. informing LexisNexis Consumer Service by not responding to my original letter dated XXXX XXXX, 2017 LexisNexis Consumer Service have not only violated federal law, but they have failed to  provide me with a copy of any viable evidence, bearing my signature, showing the account is being reported accurately.
Given that I believe you are acting in bad faith, and have not complied with the Federal Trade Commission ( 15 USC 41, et seq. ), I will filed a Small Claims lawsuit against you for failure to validate Lien/ Judgment on consumer report. ( FCRA Section 611 Part ( A ) ( 1 ) I have maintained careful records of your company actions, and you WILL BE required to appear at Superior Court of California , XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX California XX/XX/XXXX if the said information is not removed from my consumer report IMMEDIATELY. I will be seeking {$3500.00} in damages for : 1. ) Defamation, 2. ) Negligent Enablement of Identity Fraud 3. ) Violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act LexisNexis Consumer Service. Has failed to validate said Liens/ Judgment Failure to remove item off consumer report. Fail to provide proof of item. Deformation. Violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Negligent Establishment of Identify Fraud. Based on your response to the FCPB will determine my next actions. Information also needs to be updated with XXXX and XXXX. Verification according to XXXX  's Law Dictionary is " ... averment that the party pleading is ready to establish the truth of what he has set forth. '' Also, it goes on to say, " The examination of a writing for the purpose of ascertaining its truth ; or a certificate or affidavit that it is true. '' The court said " Confirmation of the correctness, truth, or authenticity of a pleading, account, or other paper, by an affidavit, oath, or deposition. '' XXXX v. XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. ; and XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX. ( XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX ; and XXXX v. XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX.
To break it down into language you can understand, verification is sworn testimony. It can be testimony in a deposition or in court or an affidavit. The only testimony that is admissible is testimony from a witness with First Hand knowledge. A court clerk does not have firsthand knowledge nor does the county recorder, nor does anyone at the credit bureaus, nor does Lexis Nexus, the main public records source for the credit bureaus. If someone verifies but they do n't have first-hand knowledge, then its not verification, its Hearsay. And hearsay is inadmissible and the court says its incompetent.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation