Consumer complaint received 04-04-2016 about Mortgage (Other mortgage) with Aldridge Pite, LLP (CA).
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Complaint: This firm caused me to file bankruptcy by filing a false recorded Notice of Default ; and continued threats of Trustee Sale Date - claiming they were assigned Trustee. Failed to review documents that contain blatant fraud ; they are trying to " Collect on a Debt '' that does not link to them. Broken Chain of Title by wrong parties has misrepresented roles claiming " Solely '' work for client XXXX and then at same time represented " False Claims of some Power of Attorney '' by XXXX acting as " Investor/Beneficiary/crto have given them rights and or assign this " Debt '' by no valid proof provided and that 'only '' items provided showed more fraud of notaries from XXXX acting to execute false signors that are non compliant under XXXX Sec of STATE laws. Violating the " NMS '' Agreement stating, No More Fraud ; Forgery ; and Fake Documents on County or Courts in this event : XXXX XXXX XXXX acted and presented false documents TO FEDERAL COURT : False and Fake Assignments ; and representations of " Altered Notes '' that another party at the same time held another claim of holding the Note ; and was informed that the documents and Notary Journals reviewed contained non compliant under " Mandatory '' requirements under XXXX State 's Laws. XXXX XXXX XXXX stated different representations of " who '' they represented ; Stating they represented the " owner-Investor-Benefiiary-creditor '' and claimed that " XXXX '' in a MFR was in fact working on behalf of a Trust named : XXXX As Trustee. There is no evidence of this and this would not be possible. XXXX XXXX has also filed defective Notice of Default ; and then " after '' sent a debt validation which was disputed : During a dispute of the Debt they continued to move forward NO pre-foreclosure efforts attached a false affidavit ; Stated MUST Only follow their Clients orders Client being Servicer only and forgetting their own due diligence under XXXX HBOR Laws. Filed a Notice of Default the same claimed Investor was in a lawsuit against XXXX XXXX XXXX for XXXX 's XX/XX/XXXX-XX/XX/XXXX ' Loans that included borrower 's origination of a loan that was given by illegal scheme and had no possibility to perform ; During this window of filing they hired a non compliant Notary : XXXX XXXX who 's journals have been reviewed and are non compliant. Continued Notary fraud to assist in false claims ; All assignments of record were reviewed and found FAKE ASSIGNMENTS by non compliant and illegal claims by Notaries in Felony Acts ; XXXX XXXX was informed and stated their only client is XXXX XXXX XXXX who hired them. The alleged XXXX as Trustee stated they are Not the Investor/Creditor/Beneficiary and could not possible be. False and Fake Claims ; Forged documents ; Intimidation tactics that have caused severe hospitalizations for stress induced ; Forced into a BK by faulty claims ; and then presented fake assignments to the Federal Courts in XX/XX/XXXX ' Filed a Sale Date of XXXX/XXXX/XXXX during a time in which written evidences of " alternative options '' being offered ; XXXX intentionally and maliciously sent off exactly planned service release ; vs keeping written promises to borrower ; and both parties failed to make good and again violating HBOR and Unfair Business Practices ; Collect on a Debt for more than the Note Value when it was " Defaulted in XXXX '' Called Due by Acceleration of the Note : Expired at 6 years and then Year 7 " AFTER '' removed from credit ; and expired under XXXX Section : 882.030 ; CCP 2911 : and UCC 3-118 ; 3-108 ; Filed a faulty NOD " After Time Barred '' disregards all laws ; Filed XXXX distinct Sale Dates while " Dual Tracking '' and instead of reviewing solid facts of " letters dated '' of proof ; instead allowed XXXX to " Omit '' Evidences that would prove she was " in '' an open review and backed XXXX up when facts are contrary ; See attached explanations : Continued Intimidation tactics and false convoluted claims made Fraud onto Federal Ct

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation