Consumer complaint received 06/18/2017 about Debt collection (I do not know) with NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE (CA).
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt was already discharged in bankruptcy and is no longer owed

Complaint: XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, CA XXXX THIS COMPANY HAS ENGAGED IN A SYSTEM OF RACKETEERING AND FRAUD WITH XXXX XXXX XXXX, AND XXXX XXXX. THE ARE SEEKING OUT UN-ENCUMBERED PROPERTIES THAT ARE PAID OFF THAT WERE INVOLVED WITH FRAUDULENT SECURITIES TO TRY TO STEAL THEM FROM THEIR RIGHTFUL OWNERS. THE PRESUMPTIVELY ARE GOING TO SELL THESE PROPERTIES AND POCKET THE FULL EQUITY VALUE AND NOT REPORT WHAT IS TRULY GOING ON TO THE IRS, PRACTICEING TAX EVASION. THEY HAVE CURRENTLY HIRED A LAWYER WHOM IS PRACTICING OR ORCHESTRATING THE FRAUD FOR THEM. <P/>This law firm XXXX XXXX XXXX SB # XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, # XXXX XXXX XXXX, CA XXXX telephone XXXX He is working with a company XXXX XXXX, XXXX to commit fraud on the XXXX FAMILY, this law firm and the above company is also working with a company named XXXX XXXX, and XXXX XXXX XXXX, whom XXXX had already wrote demand to validated the debt letters to, and letters disupting the debt. Even Though these letters were sent out the these entities XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX, and XXXX DEFAULT SERVICES, none every responded to XXXX which was their Article/Title 5 responsibility to do. Once the fraud was committed by XXXX XXXX, and XXXX XXXX XXXX, then XXXX XXXX, XXXX was also sent the letters from XXXX and also did not respond. Currently, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, is working with XXXX XXXX XXXX that is creating fake documents with XXXX XXXX, XXXX to steal the XXXX home and property. XXXX sent out documents to rebut all presumptions of XXXX XXXX, XXXX. XXXX were supposed to have a jury trial till a summary judgement for unlawful detainer was filed. Currently XXXX had a judgment not in their favor, even thought they showed a judge evidence that they have not debt to foreclose on. And own the Note and are in possession of the note that invalidates the deed of trust that they are trying to foreclose on. There are other evidence that show there is no debt like a report from the secretary of state on the UCC that shows there is no debt since XX/XX/XXXX and no current debt owed. I have filed over 15 reports about that same senario but different parties doing this to us over and over again. The XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX in this case was also trying to work for the Plaintiff and was rushing to judgment even though he did not look through the paperwork. Much of the paperwork prepared by XXXX XXXX XXXX was all manufactured fraudulent done by XXXX XXXX, XXXX. XXXX found out that the judge also has a pension based in mortgage backed securities and also retired back in XX/XX/XXXX. He has been out of active practice of law for 10 years, and XXXX asked him about certain cases he had no idea, not even knowledgable of IRC 860G and REMIC trusts so he was not qualified to judge this case. XXXX feel he acted prejudicail to XXXX XXXX, XXXX, since he was helping them craft arguments against XXXX. Each argument XXXX objection handled and diffused. Explaining that there was no mortgage to foreclose on, and that the Judgment listed in the count record was from court fees XXXX already paid through the court to the county comptroller. So there is no judgment or mortgage debt they could have purchased in a foreclosure auction. This is a new tactic since they did not respond to any of the other debt dispute letters/or demand for debt validation, any of the companies perpetrating this fraud were non-compliant to respond.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation