Consumer complaint received 09/28/2015 about Consumer Loan (Vehicle lease) with ALLY FINANCIAL INC. (NC).
Issue: Managing the loan or lease

Complaint: I was leasing a vehicle through Ally financial and returned the vehicle to a dealership, as instructed by Ally, to end the lease in early XXXX. I signed an odometer disclosure and was instructed to wait for a final bill, which would include any remaining lease balance plus any excess wear and tear identified during the inspection. I was told not to continue making payments on the account and that I did not need to be concerned with the account becoming past due. I began receiving collection calls from Ally in early XXXX and was informed that my account was past due. I explained the situation multiple times and was informed that somehow between the dealership and Ally, the return was never recorded. I was told not to worry, this would get sorted out with the dealer and that my account would not be reflected as & gt ; 30 DPD and would not be reported to any of the credit bureaus. For an additional 1-2 weeks I continued to receive harassing collections calls, and returned at least XXXX of them to clarify that the account was properly noted as being in a " pending termination '' status. Each time I asked for, and received confirmation that the account would be reflected as such, that I did not need to do anything further, and that the account would not be reported as past due. Towards the end of this month ( XXXX ), the calls finally ceased, however I recently received a credit report that my account with Ally is & gt ; 30 DPD. This has been reflected on XXXX of the XXXX usual credit bureaus as of the day I am writing this complaint. I called Ally on the day I received the first notification and was again assured that the account was in fact now in a terminated status, was not identified as being past due, and my credit would not be affected. Based on their track record thus far, I am less than confident that the error committed by Ally in reporting my account incorrectly as past due will be corrected without any negative impacts. The time spent thus far to get Ally to correct their own mistakes has been unacceptable. This does not include the level of stressed placed on me as a consumer. To make matters worse, I was not afforded the opportunity to be present for the vehicle inspection, and as of today do not know if there will be any excess charges. Based on my own inspection, I do not anticipate there will be any, however because the vehicle sat for over 30 days outside of my possession before the inspection occurred, I have no way of knowing if any damage occurred. Further, I have been given no recourse in the event some damage is identified as I am only able to state, based on my word, that the damage did not exist when the vehicle was returned to the dealership. Their process is clearly flawed because it relies on mutual coordination between XXXX parties, excluding the consumer ( Ally and the dealership ). Last, the consumer is fully at the mercy of these XXXX parties in the event either of them makes any mistakes. I have never once in my life had such a bad experience with any business, big or small.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation