Consumer complaint received 06/16/2016 about Mortgage (Conventional fixed mortgage) with SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. (CA).
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Complaint: SPS I am requesting a complete breakdown of all fees and cost and any forced policy - A complete transaction history. 

Again SPS is not clear XXXX - SPS there were no options to deal with XXXX? 
I will have transaction history checked by a professional once received. Again SPS originally told me over the phone it was over by more than XXXX dollars and would not confirm amount with XXXX. However it is now being confirmed the amount was only XXXX - appears some game is going on at SPS. If SPS really wanted to assist me in keeping my home - an option would have been presented. 

SPS wrote : Denial of XXXX In your inquiry you state the amount to reinstate your account was below the XXXX amount of {$100000.00} when SPS denied you for the assistance. At the time the account was reviewed for XXXX the amount to reinstate the account was {$100000.00}. 

SPS received the assistance request regarding a principal reduction recast program from XXXX on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. The purpose of the XXXX recast assistance is to have funds applied to the principal balance of the account, resulting in a lowered monthly payment. Because the account exceeded the program allowable assistance, SPS is unable to proceed. The total amount is broken down as follows : Past due payments XXXX XXXX, XXXX to XXXX XXXX, XXXX {$91000.00} XXXX XXXX, XXXX payment {$3200.00} Loan Level Advances {$1600.00} Escrow Advance {$3900.00} Reinstatement Amount {$100000.00} I wrote : The income does not appear to be the challenge regarding modification option XXXX Tier XXXX. Appears SPS focus is on the EQUITY in my home. My family has stated indirectly and directly to SPS they can assist me finantially. No matter what my income is SPS will not assist because of Equity as was told to me today by XXXX and SPS representative - SPS just say that instead of making up income that I never gave you at no time. 

SPS is conveniently over by XXXX - to not except XXXX SPS seems surprised that after SPS denied assisting me XXXX approved me SPS told me to allow them to assist first and then SPS can receive additional funds from XXXX However XXXX confirmed yes a dual-program does exist however SPS should have not told you that as SPS is not signed up for that program at the moment- SPS can however currently they are not. 
SPS representative told me on the same day - SPS is concerned if they except XXXX funds I would not be able to make my payments. 
SPS statement do not show a breakdown of amount due I believe on purpose - when XXXX XXXX XXXX transferred the loan my statements had a breakdown of fees in XXXX. 

If SPS states its because of the bankruptcy - SPS should stop reporting to all XXXX credit bureaus every month impacting my credit. 

SPS statements originally had a breakdown - and then nothing. I have no way of tracking alleged total due. 

Also I requested the investor ADDRESS - not SPS address the alleged servicer - whom appear to have more involvement that disclosing.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation