milesbutler/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 11/29/2016 about Mortgage (Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)) with SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. (GA).
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Complaint: I have spent months providing Select Portfolio Servicing with requested documentation pertaining to my deed of lieu we agreed upon. Today I have received a letter stating that my loan is to be restarted. They are requesting information I have already provided to them. Instead given me the answer to their decision regarding my deed of lieu. The process abruptly restarted all while I am communicating with them asking for more time to contact my daughter to get the new unexpected documentation. In the intervening period of time, I send the new requested documents on my behalf. This whole conversation has been recorded my both SPS and myself. 

XXXX XXXX, 2016, I received the first Mortgage Statement in a year, shortly I received another letter dated XXXX XXXX, 2016, stating " the mortgage servicer on the above- referenced account, received your inquiry regarding a possible mortgage workout plan. '' The whole statement above is a lie. I allowed Select Portfolio Servicing each time they requested to record our conversation so that I could put on my speaker phone on to record them as well. I have recorded our communication for the last year. I have dates, times, what was said according to our stated agreements XXXX XXXX, 2016, at XXXX I requested the status of my deed of lieu, I was told that my request was still being investigated for a ruling. 

Below are the dates and time I recorded my deed of lieu conversation recently with Select Portfolio Servicing. 
XXXX XXXX, 2016 ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX, 2016 ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX, 2016 ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX, 2016 ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX, 2016 ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX, 2016 ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX, 2016 ( XXXX )

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 05/16/2017 about Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports (Credit reporting) with EQUIFAX, INC. (MN).
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint: I Need to file a complaint on Equifax 8 times I have asked them to investigate credit inquires on my Equifax credit report they have refused to investigate the items listed below. they asked me to contact the companies below I did so and they failed to respond back to me Per the FCRA Equifax has 30 days to investigate if this issue is not resolved by Equifax I will file a lawsuit 
  XXXX   XXXX   XXXX   DATE   XXXX     XXXX   XXXX     XXXX     XXXX   XXXX     XXXX   XXXX   XXXX     XXXX   XXXX     XXXX   XXXX   XXXX  
IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO PROVIDE THE INFO THAT I'm asking for please remove these authorize inquires   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX     XXXX   XXXX   XXXX   
  XXXX   MN  XXXX 
 XX/XX/XXXX 
Social Security #  XXXX 

Equifax   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX    
Dear Credit Bureau Representative:

	I recently reviewed a copy of my credit report and noticed the following information regarding inquiries to be in error. The Fair Credit Reporting Act states that the only permissible purpose for pulling a persons credit report is (1) a firm offer of credit, (2) insurance, (3) an application for employment, or (4) a court order.

	The following inquiries are not related to one of the allowable purposes, as I have reiterated from The Fair Credit Reporting Act.

1.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 07/16/2015 about Credit reporting () with EQUIFAX, INC. (FL).
Issue: Unable to get credit report/credit score
Sub-issue: Problem getting report or credit score

Complaint: I subscribe to XXXX XXXX which is a joint venture of XXXX XXXX and Equifax. 
I am presently applying for a refinance mortgage on my primary residence with a local lender. 
The lender asked me, " what is your credit score ''? I pulled XXXX XXXX ( screen shot provided ) from my smart phone and I responded " XXXX and XXXX - XXXX XXXX and Equifax respectively ''. 
Lender pulls my credit and the scores are XXXX XXXX XXXX a XXXX point difference and XXXX Equifax a XXXX point difference. 
These companies are misleading consumers with incorrect credit scores which in the end impacts the pricing on my mortgage. 
By the way, both the screen shot and credit pull was done the same day - XXXX XXXX, 2015. 
Requiring accurate credit scores to be reported to the consumer without large differences should be an absolute requirement of the credit bureau repositories.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 11-06-2017 about Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports (Credit reporting) with EQUIFAX, INC. (CA).
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account status incorrect

Complaint: XXXX/XXXX/XXXX XXXX has listed all account status in collections on my. The accounts listed have been paid off in full. My most recent credit report shows the change, credit file number of XXXX. It list all accounts that can be viewed on report in collection status. XXXX also list accounts older then 7 years 15U.S.C. 1681c sub section ( a ) ( 5 ) and 15U.S.C. 1681c sub section ( c ) ( 1 ).
XXXX has listed accounts more then 7 years 15U.S.C. 1681c sub section ( a ) ( 5 ) and 15U.S.C. 1681c sub section ( c ) ( 1 ).
Equifax has listed accounts more then 7 years 15U.S.C. 1681c sub section ( a ) ( 5 ) and 15U.S.C. 1681c sub section ( c ) ( 1 ). 
XXXX is not giving me access to my credit report and I do pay a monthly payment to view, they also will not allow a dispute. Online access is jammed and phone calls turn bad do to naive behavior of employees that do n't understand the it problem associated with online dispute. Because I 'm given the option to use online or phone, this is how I 'd rather discuss it. Using mail requires to much time and I 'm not home during mail hours of operation. Thank You!

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 12/20/2017 about Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports (Credit reporting) with JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. (NC).
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account status incorrect

Complaint: I was a chase business credit card, card holder. 
I was suppose to receive cash back for my gas purchases. 
I was not receiving it. 
I Contacted chase. 
After several months of being reassured that the issue would be taken care of and being sent to different chase employees I was told that because the card was n't actually going in the fuel pump machine and the company I was purchasing the fuel from was charging once a week that chase would not being giving me my percentage on fuel purchases although it clearly stated the company as being an oil company. I felt as though chase owed me money and they were refusing to pay me so I refused to pay them. 
Chase started calling me trying to receive payment and it might have even be an outside agency that was calling me. After receiving threats on these calls I decided to contact a law firm that I found on the internet. ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ) This firm supposedly started dealing with chase but it was a long process and I eventually quit dealing with the firm because I felt they were just draining me for money. Today I contacted chase to try and receive information and maybe workout a resolution. I asked to speak to a manager and when I got to him I was told that he could not give me any information on the account because a lawyer was listed on the account information. 
I was recently told by someone that checked my credit report that chase had reported in XX/XX/XXXX a charge off. 
I also remember receiving a XXXX from chase that I sent to the lawyer regarding the charge off debt.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 07-09-2015 about Bank account or service (Savings account) with CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION (DE).
Issue: Account opening, closing, or management

Complaint: I received invitation from Bank to open Savings Account through XXXX mail. I applied Online for savings Account, I met with an error and it advised me to call them. When I called them, they denied the Account opening saying I do not have sufficient history from third party regarding my SSN. I asked them if they can send an email about denial or if I can send more documents, proof to satify requirements. They simply said No for everything and denied Account opening. They simply said we cant help. I have excellent credit rating and I am clueless about what happened.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 12/14/2017 about Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports (Credit reporting) with Experian Information Solutions Inc. (CA).
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Public record information inaccurate

Complaint: Previous complaint XXXX the response from the credit agency states the investigation will result in contacting a Vendor to verify the alleged negative item in my credit report. 

Verification from a vendor is not the actual source, which is the Court. The courts do not verify information so verification from a Vendor is not accurate reporting, it 's Hearsay. Please remove the alleged negative item from my credit report according to FCRA.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 10/26/2016 about Debt collection (Medical) with Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc. (FL).
Issue: Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt is not mine

Complaint: This is not and never was my account.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 04/26/2017 about Debt collection (I do not know) with Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc. (CA).
Issue: Communication tactics
Sub-issue: You told them to stop contacting you, but they keep trying

Complaint: I have communicated several times to  Professional Bureau Of Collections of Maryland representatives to DO NOT CONTACT me at work. This collection agency   has been requesting a copy of my credit report and I currently do not have a reported debt with this agency. I have NOT received any written notification of any debt that is owed, yet this company keeps calling from a multitude of different numbers on my office phone and is now going through the operator switch board.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 10-12-2016 about Mortgage (Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)) with Quality Loan Service Corporation (CA).
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Complaint: I have sent notification to this trustee who is attempting to wrongfully foreclose on my property. By their filing of instruments they are in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act ( codified at 15 U.S.C. 1691 et. Seq. ) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( codified at 15 U.S.C. 1681 ). Trustor is exercising his/her right to conclude and inform you that your NOD Instrument does not constitute Notice and is invalid under California Gov't Code 27201 et. Seq. Specifically, the legal sufficiency of the Filed Instrument is disputed and denied by Trustor. Because of this discovery we have demanded that the trustee cancel TS # : XXXX. To this date, and to our knowledge, they have failed to cancel the Trustee 's Sale. 
I believe that if any attempt is made to execute the Trustee Sale identified above, they will be acting with Notice of invalid Filed Instruments and of debt disputed by the Trustor. They have been so advised that, because of and consequent to this Notice of invalid Filed Instruments, " QLSC '' is exposed to full liability, jointly and severally, along with the Beneficiary ( s ) and/or affiliated entities for any damages that may, in the future, be awarded for filing false instruments, breach of contract, or wrongful foreclosure. 
A material defect in the NOD, such as gross misstatement of the amount in default, voids the sale, and the trustee may refuse to convey the trustee deed. XXXX v. Superior Court ( XX/XX/XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX. The court in City of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) also stated that : " the purposes of the Recording Statute is to provide Notice ... whether valid or invalid ... if invalid instrument is filed, no Notice is given. '' The Trustors ' rights under both the deed of trust and statute are being violated by QLSC. QLSC was never properly and legally substituted as trustee of the subject deed of trust, therefore, you are statutorily prohibited from asserting any such authority. It is in criminal violation of Cal. Penal Code 115.5, Filing False Instruments. The Filed Instruments identified herein are statutorily defective and false. They were demanded to immediately remove them from the public record permanently and to cause Public Notice of such remediation to be effected immediately. After receiving no response from Quality Loan Service Corp, we mailed them a Notice of Default notifying the company that they were in default on their obligation to rescind the Notice of Default as demanded by the Trustor and were in breach of contract.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 02-09-2016 about Credit card () with CITIBANK, N.A. (AP).
Issue: Late fee

Complaint: Received instant credit from Macy 's in-store and purchased items. Macey 's failed to deliver a bill, a card, or any method to check account or pay until AFTER the due date, but still assessed late fee. Immediately upon receiving bill I attempted to pay online, but their system remained down for a full day. Even though i paid the amount in full AND the inappropriately charged fee, they STILL assessed an additional interest fee. they agreed to close the acocunt. I am receiving this treatment as a direct result of my being XXXX address, and the company not getting initial card or bill to me in a reasonable amount of time before due date.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 04/17/2015 about Student loan (Non-federal student loan) with NELNET, INC. (TX).
Issue: Can't repay my loan
Sub-issue: Can't decrease my monthly payments

Complaint: In XXXX XXXX, I was contacted by First Mark Services concerning my private loan. I XXXX from XXXX school on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. Immediately after XXXX I requested a grace period of 6 months after XXXX to begin repayment. A representative, XXXX XXXX from First Mark Services indicated that their records reflected that I used the grace period during the period of XXXX XXXX through XXXX XXXX. However, during that time period I was enrolled in school and did not use that grace period for repayment as I was a XXXX student and not required to make payments on the loan during that time. At the time, I submitted the form to nelnet loan company it was accepted by the customer service in XXXX. 

I submitted the same form that during that time I was enrolled as a XXXX student in school ( XXXX in XXXX ). Upon submitted the form I found that without further evaluation or confirming my enrollment they denied my request via the indicated form. 

Desiring to resolve this matter I then requested to reduce my payment amount to {$50.00} a month since I am currently unemployed and preparing for resident matching this summer, XXXX. After several email exchanges with XXXX XXXX, it was concluded that I could make $ 50 monthly payments until I became employed and was able to make the full monthly payment amountIn my email I stated that I will be able to make {$50.00} now then 2 weeks later I will be able to make a payment of {$100.00}, then afterward I will make auto pay of {$50.00} a month. I made my XXXX payment of {$50.00} then he contacted me and indicated that I will need to start making full payments and denying that he agreed to reduce my payment to $ 50 monthly. 
I felt I was really misinformed and misguided by the company. At the same time, I felt I was robbed of my grace period. 
I am trying hard to work things out with the company while the company is not even doing the minimum to help me. They are not even meeting the minimum requirements as indicated by law to completely inform me. They are using short answers that have misguided me.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 11/27/2017 about Debt collection (I do not know) with Forest Recovery Services LLC (FL).
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt was result of identity theft

Complaint: XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX SEC # XXXX DOB XXXX/XXXX/XXXX ADDRESS XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX FL XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$120.00} Your company have violated FCRA 615 ( f ) ( 15 U.S.C. 1681m ( f ) ) ( f ) Prohibition on sale or transfer of debt caused by identity theft You have not responded to my request to provide me with an investigation report.

I need this resolve, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, these disputed items may not appear on my credit report if they can not be supported by any evidence ( 1 ) In general No person ( company ) shall sell, transfer for consideration, or place for collection a debt that such person has been notified under section 1681c-2 of this title has resulted from identity theft.

( 2 ) Applicability The prohibitions of this subsection shall apply to all persons collecting a debt described in paragraph ( 1 ) after the date of a notification under paragraph ( 1 ).

( 3 ) Rule of construction Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit -- ( A ) The repurchase of a debt in any case in which the assignee of the debt requires such repurchase because the debt has resulted from identity theft ; ( B ) the securitization of a debt or the pledging of a portfolio of debt as collateral in connection with a borrowing ; or ( C ) the transfer of debt as a result of a merger, acquisition, purchase and assumption transaction, or transfer of substantially all of the assets of an entity. 
A person that furnishes information to any consumer reporting agency shall have in place reasonable procedures to respond to any notification that it receives from a consumer reporting agency under section 1681c-2 of this title relating to information resulting from identity theft, to prevent that person from refurnishing such blocked  information. 
The reference items are listed below please take this matter very serious Forest Recovery Service {$120.00} I have report your company to consumerfinance.gov As a form of record and I am prepare to sue your company Example In re XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Litigation, Case No. XXXX, in the XXXX XXXX XXXX for the XXXX XXXX XXXX California Stop collection proceedings against me Signatures on applications and accounts Investigators report XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX SEC # XXXX DOB XXXX/XXXX/XXXX ADDRESS XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX FL XXXX

Company public response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 12/29/2016 about Bank account or service (Checking account) with BBVA COMPASS FINANCIAL CORPORATION (GA).
Issue: Account opening, closing, or management

Complaint: On XX/XX/XXXX, Simple Bank froze my account without telling me a reason why, but requesting bank statements for all external accounts linked to my account with them. As far as I was aware, the only linked account was the one from which the initial funding came, which was with XXXX, so I responded to their message with that information. After receiving no response, I looked again and noticed that there were two accounts I did not recognize that were showing up as linked to my account, so I sent another message stating so, and again received no response. I have called the customer support line multiple times trying to get any information about what is going on, if they need anything else from me, and to get an idea of when I could expect to be contacted or when the issue might be resolved. The customer service representatives claimed they were unable to provide any of this information and refused to transfer me to a supervisor or to provide contact information for anyone that could possibly answer my questions. I have been unable to access my funds for a week now, and Simple Bank is providing zero information to me. At this point, I have missed bill payments and have no money with which to buy groceries/gas/etc. and I have a rent payment coming up that I am afraid I will not be able to pay because my funds are inaccessible.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 03/26/2017 about Credit reporting () with TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC. (CA).
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Reinserted previously deleted info

Complaint: i recently received a letter from Transunion on XX/XX/2017 stating that the investigation of the dispute of credit error item had completed, and the item of error has been successfully deleted or removed from my credit report. So i checked my credit report online and the item was cleared then but somehow on XX/XX/2017 the item of error reappear on my credit report again as i recheck my credit online religiously. i have been discussed this matter with the credit grantor and it was settled in an agreement. In my humble request for the credit report agency to investigate what is happening with this matter and provide a best solution in regard of this item of error.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 06-06-2016 about Student loan (Non-federal student loan) with Navient Solutions, LLC. (NY).
Issue: Dealing with my lender or servicer
Sub-issue: Trouble with how payments are handled

Complaint: I am the co-signer of my Son 's student loan from Navient. My son applied for and was granted a reduced rate payment plan. However, Navient was still reporting past due payments. I contracted Navient and spoke to their agent XXXX XXXX where he discovered that the accounts were still reflecting the old rate not the reduced rate. I spent an hour on the phone with him as he corrected the accounts and got them up to date and paid in full. He said everything was corrected and no monies or further action was required on my part. Going forward Navient reported to all XXXX credit bureaus that the XXXX accounts in question where 60 days past due and all XXXX of my scores took a tremendous hit and went down close to XXXX points. I 've made numerous phone calls to Navient beginning in XXXX to explain and they conceded that made an error and would retract the 60 day late payments made to all three credit bureaus. I 've written them letters asking them to investigate as 60 days late is still showing on my credit reports. Friday XXXX XXXX, Navient sent me results of their investigation saying the 60 days late is accurate and will not remove it from my credit reports. Between the taped phone calls and typed phone transactions with several agents it will prove my version of events is true and accurate. I am appealing their decision once again, however, I fear they will give me the same results. I really need your assistance as I have no idea how to proceed to have their wrong righted on my credit reports

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief