Consumer complaint received 08/13/2017 about Debt collection (I do not know) with GC Services Limited Partnership (CA).
Issue: False statements or representation
Sub-issue: Impersonated attorney, law enforcement, or government official

Complaint: This is in reference to complaint XXXX, XXXX. After being notified that there was a response from the GG Services debt collector and the California Franchise board said it was GC Services that made the illegal levy said they dont know who made a execution of levy. Unauthorized stole money out of my bank account I responded in time and was deceptively lied to. One side it was GC Services the other side saying it was the Franchise board. Somebody did it. I filled out the documents disputed the money the was stolen brought the documents to the place of business and had the documents to submit it there and was the only reason going down there to the XXXX  Superior court were these GC Services are hiding at. They are both lying. CFPB told me they have already sent the pertinent details to the other side at the franchise board. I receive this email XX/XX/XXXX. While waiting all this time for the GC Services/ Franchise Board to return the money because of hardships and also GC services and has not heard back until now and seeing that they put the second sending of the complaint as repeat. Only for it to be labeled as duplicate. This is not acceptable because they were to return the money already because GC Services is using illegal deceptive tactics to collect a supposed debt I was never aware of. I dont know what is going on I do know the California Franchise Tax Board has a pattern of acting with oppression, fraud, or malice. That if the just go and levy accounts when a company such as GC Services Limited Partnership known for losing lawsuits for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ) in the course of its debt collection efforts with consumers. For unlawfully misrepresented the rights of consumers to dispute the alleged debt over legally harrassing debt notices, using deceptive language. see XXXX XXXX v GC Services Limited Partnership ... XXXX Any how doesnt California FTB collect taxes, so how would they have jurisdiction to this matter?? I filled out This is in reference to complaint XXXX, XXXX. After being notified that there was a response from the GG Services debt collector and the California Franchise board said it was GC Services that made the illegal levy said they dont know who made a execution of levy. Unauthorized stole money out of my bank account I responded in time and was deceptively lied to. One side it was GC Services the other side saying it was the Franchise board. Somebody did it. I filled out the documents disputed the money the was stolen brought the documents to the place of business and had the documents to submit it there and was the only reason going down there to the XXXX Superior court were these GC Services are hiding at. They are both lying. CFPB told me they have already sent the pertinent details to the other side at the franchise board. I receive this email XX/XX/XXXX. While waiting all this time for the GC Services/ Franchise Board to return the money because of hardships and also GC services and has not heard back until now and seeing that they put the second sending of the complaint as repeat. Only for it to be labeled as duplicate. This is not acceptable because they were to return the money already because GC Services is using illegal deceptive tactics to collect a supposed debt I was never aware of. I dont know what is going on I do know the California Franchise Tax Board has a pattern of acting with oppression, fraud, or malice. That if the just go and levy accounts when a company such as GC Services Limited Partnership known for losing lawsuits for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ) in the course of its debt collection efforts with consumers. For unlawfully misrepresented the rights of consumers to dispute the alleged debt over legally harrassing debt notices, using deceptive language. see XXXX XXXX v GC Services Limited Partnership ... XXXX Any how doesnt California FTB collect taxes, so how would they have jurisdiction to this matter?? I filled out Forms XXXX Request for a Collection Due Process or Equivalent Hearing signed and dated XX/XX/XXXX according to the Taxpayers ' Rights Advocate to receive my funds back according to Law with Cease and Desist letter when I went down to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX California, XXXX XX/XX/XXXX and submitted this with ceist and desist included material from 42 USC section 1983 United States Code civil action for deprivation of rights : 26 U.S Code 6330- Notice and  opportunity for hearing before levy. The Bank was to send a levy and didnt this is a due process violation. That the FTB is involved in theft stole over {$380000.00} in fake tax refunds embezzlement. XXXX XXXX of XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, and 43 accomplices used state computers since XX/XX/XXXX to embezzle state funds. Board of Equalization had misallocated XXXX XXXX in tax revenue-according to State Controller XXXX XXXX proposal. Buying $ XXXX furniture for one chair. Is this why they are stealing money out of bank account simply because a debt collection told them to and. This is acceptable. I have hardships. I had to take the bus and train down to courthouse I dont even have enough money to buy a older car. This doenst make any sense. This is oppression, fraud, and malice. The Federal Tort Claims Act, States Tort Claims Act says this is not correct behavior. see XXXX v Six Unknown named Agents. according to the Taxpayers ' Rights Advocate to receive my funds back according to Law with Cease and Desist letter when I went down to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX California, XXXX XX/XX/XXXX and submitted this with ceist and desist included material from 42 USC section 1983 United States Code civil action for deprivation of rights : 26 U.S Code 6330- Notice and opportunity for hearing before levy. The Bank was to send a levy and didnt this is a due process violation. That the FTB is involved in theft stole over {$380000.00} in fake tax refunds embezzlement. XXXX XXXX of XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, and 43 accomplices used state computers since XX/XX/XXXX to embezzle state funds. Board of Equalization had misallocated XXXX  XXXX in tax revenue-according to State Controller XXXX XXXX proposal. Buying $ XXXX furniture for one chair. The Calfornia has so many more things that they do illegally with hard eraned money of tax payers it is unreal. Is this why they are stealing money out of bank accounts unlawfully simply because a debt collector such as GC Services who lost multiple lawsuits all across the board for illegal activities told them to. This is unacceptable. I have hardships. I had to take the bus and train down to this courthouse I dont even have enough money to buy a older car. This doesnt make any sense. This is oppression, fraud, and malice. The Federal Tort Claims Act, States Tort Claims Act says this is not correct behavior. see XXXX v Six Unknown named Agents. I have much more to add..

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation