Newsgroup: it.salute
Titolo: LO STAFF COMUNICA : scientific review paper about candida.

 
scientific review paper:
 
An abstract trend of evolution is only understood well, if one comes
to understand its necessity, meaning to be able to predict the trend
in hindsight. As such, the properties of fungi are predicted in this
paper. Beside animals and plants, fungi are the third branch of
multicellular eukaryotic life forms. Having neither mouth, nor
chlorophyll, they are usually saprofytic in the soil. However, they
can establish themselves parasitically in animals and plants.
Next to that, they are more succesful parasites than bacteria:
 
Because they generate 18 times more energy, as they have mitochondria
that generate 18 times more ATP molecules from one sugar molecule than
bacteria do.
Because they evolve much faster than bacteria, as they can reproduce
sexually.
Because they can pull back food, cytoplasm and DNA out of threatened
areas, as they are multicellular.
Because they have the ability to be unicellular, i.e. a fungus�s cells
can separate themselves, only to regroup afterward.
 
Evolutionary speed does not depend on sexual reproduction only, but
also on the size of a population of cells and their lifespan; the
number of good mutations is proportional to the size of the population
of cells and the speed of selection is inversely proportional to their
lifespan. A unicellular organism�s lifespan, e.g. an hour, fits
24*365*30=262,800 times into ours. This means their speed of selection
is 262,800 times the rate of ours. At a diameter of 4�m per fungal
cell with a total volume of 4mm�, its population shall have exceeded 1
billion already. A little more fungus shall yield a population the
size of mankind. The single multicellular fungus individual evolves in
our bodies just as mankind as a whole does, but it does that 262,800
times our rate. It does that at a bigger rate than any other life form
known to mankind. N.B. unicellular eukaryotes have a similar speed of
selection, but have no sizable, coherent population.
 
In conclusion to the preceding, fungi are undoubtedly the perfect
parasites. They have the following features:
 
Bacteria can live solitarily in the blood stream. Fungus cannot live
in the blood stream, because it needs to live within a coherent
network. Therefore, fungus lives outside of the blood stream. It lives
in unstructured connective tissue, so it does not live in structured
tissue, such as muscles and nerves.
In the blood stream, bacteria are fully visible to the immune system.
It defends the body by reacting with fever. Living outside of the
blood stream, fungus is hard to detect. Therefore, the immune system
does not respond with fever.
Bacteria, contrary to fungus, are fully detectable by conducting a
blood test on a patient.
Fungus tries to shield itself as a coherent structure, thus forming a
tumor.
 
Fungus, however, is able to disperse itself undetectably by emanating
single unicellular parts (in the form of minuscule, untouchable
spores). It is thereby traveling through the blood stream to other
parts of the body, creating metastases.
 
The aforesaid features describing fungus as an (internal) parasite,
have been deduced. These features are all of the 5 features of cancer.
However, cancer has not been defined by the understanding of what it
actually is. In contrast, it has been defined by an as yet
misunderstood complex of precisely these 5 features. The understood
fungus realizes precisely the misunderstood complex of symptoms, which
are caused by cancer.
 
Therefore, cancer is almost certainly a kind of fungus, which is the
thesis that Dr. Simoncini has posited. This thesis has been confirmed
yet more, because his therapy against fungus (using sodium
bicarbonate) appears to work efficiently against cancer.
 
Fungus evolved in (acid) forest soil, so it needs an acid environment.
As a consequence, fungus cannot handle basic sodium bicarbonate. Yet
again, this process is understood when dealing with fungus, but only
observed when dealing with cancer.
 
Cancer is currently explained as being mutated body cells growing
uncontrollably, thus forming a tumor, after which some of those cells
split off and form another tumor elsewhere. This process is fully
compatible with the growth of fungus: during uncontrollable cell
proliferation unstructured tissue is formed, in which fungus
immediately establishes itself. Alternately, it could be that fungus
induces body cells to mutate, growing uncontrollably, because this
increases the amount of unstructured tissue, in which cancer thrives.
 
In a column of NRC�s science special (newspaper), dated 1st of June
2013, Piet Borst M.D., Ph.D. wrote of immunotherapy to combat cancer.
In 1983, he was appointed director at Nederlands Kanker
Instituut-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek. In said column, he explains the
surface of tumor cells has receptors that absorb passing molecules
from the blood stream. A tumor needs those molecules for growth.
Immunotherapy, as applied in case of cancer, slows the growth of
cancer down, by stimulating the production of antibodies. It is also
explained the immune system contains T-cells. Those are white blood
cells that recognize and kill invasive cells.
However, it appears that cancer cells can hide well their abnormal
properties from the immune system. Nonetheless, some kinds of T-cells
can penetrate a tumor to attack it from within. Immunotherapy is used
to isolate, multiply and deploy those T-cells, yet they are
aggressive. As a consequence, they are dangerous to the body.
Moreover, they are restricted by way of ingenious regulatory systems
to prevent auto-immune disease. Tumor cells skillfully exploit these
systems to repel the attack of the aggressive T-cells.
 
Three times, tumor has been described as an independent organism,
efficiently taking care of its own survival. Firstly, it gets the
nourishment it needs; secondly, it hides from the attacking T-cells;
thirdly, it repels their attack. The genetical explanation of cancer
may be acceptable insofar it is possible that animal evolution has not
been able to prevent cell proliferation arising from mutations. On the
contrary, it seems highly unlikely that co�ncidental cell
proliferation systematically shall result in an organism that
efficiently turns on its host by using a plethora of tactics.
Through natural selection, evolution incessantly causes the
advancement of organisms that are better adapted to their environment,
as they are more likely to survive competitors. Evolution does not
produce organisms that systematically destroy their own existence.
Being an independent organism and taking care of its own survival,
tumor is alien to the body. This proves it evolved outside of the
body. Next to that, it may be obvious that it is a fungus. A fungus
evolves incredibly fast, so it can defend its tumor with ingenious
tactics. Cancer Is A Fungus shall be recognized in the future by every
discovery proving the way a tumor or a seperate cancer cell
systematically ensures its survival.
 
Recently, a group of oncologists optimistically declared they will be
better able to map the genes that supposedly cause cancer. In this
way, they will be able to develop separate therapies, in accordance
with the requirements of each gen. Thereby, cancer should be pushed
back drastically. They presume all of those genes to be able to
produce the same tumor, which is deadly and adaptive. That is nonsense
in my opinion. The more fitting explanation is that the one fungus has
evolved in such a way, that it understands the weak genes and
manipulates them. That oncological research should not be attacked in
a frontal assault, but convinced to research the genetical and
molecular mechanisms of that fungus. In this unexplored area, Nobel
Prizes are to be expected.
 
This insight is sufficiently reasonable to rehabilitate Simoncini,
which opens up the way for him to be awarded the Nobel Prize. However,
I believe it is much more important � especially for him � that his
therapy should be commonly applied to the treatment of cancer
patients, so that millions may survive. To that goal, I can nor am
willing to dedicate myself. I consider it my job to acquire repeatedly
such fundamental insights in different areas.
 
 
http://www.curenaturalicancro.com
 
 
 
-- 
LO Staff - 
www.zapcandida.com
 
consulenze...@consultant.com
 


Anche questo non � male come umorisimo, il bicarbonato
che guarisce il cancro che sarebbe un fungo.
 
Sotto i funghi vivono i puffi, veri responsabili del
cancro.
Non l'avevano arrestato Simoncini?
 
 
 

 Non l'avevano arrestato Simoncini?
 
Non possono. Chi lo laure� con 30 e lode � troppo potente.
 
Bye,
 
   *GB*

 Non possono. Chi lo laure� con 30 e lode � troppo potente.
 
110 e lode, volevo dire. Ma chiss� che non abbia fatto un solo esame
e gli altri tutti abbuonati sulla fiducia.
 
Bye,
 
   *GB*


  No, e' scappato anche dall'Albania, ora vola verso 
  un remoto pianeta:
 
 
http://i48.tinypic.com/ndsntj.jpg