Newsgroup: it.cultura.militare
Titolo: Who Won? Who Lost and Why?

Who Won? Who Lost and Why?
For anyone confused about the results of the war in Lebanon, what with both
For anyone confused about the results of the war in Lebanon, what with
both Israel and the Hezbollah claiming victory, the following rule of
thumb should be helpful. Those claiming an Israeli victory and a
Hezbollah defeat are basing themselves on things that are supposedly going
to happen in the future. George W. is the most prestigious representative
of the ?Israel won? school of thought. He said this. ?How can Hezbollah
claim victory when they are going to be replaced?? Georgie, losing still
another battle with the English language, must have meant ?displaced.?
Experts on GWB explain that he quite often confuses things that he wants
to happen with things that are actually happening.
Those, who state that Israel lost and Hezbollah won, base themselves on
what happened, and this is of course, the only reliable basis for
analysis.
The extent of the loss and the significance of the Israeli defeat are, of
course, open to discussion.
And now, I have to make a confession. A few days back I wrote an article
for our Hebrew website, ?Hagada Ha?smolit? [Left Bank]. Pained and
disgusted at the war and the steady stream of the official lies, I said
some very unpleasant things about the state of Israeli society. The key
motif of that article was that even the most consistent opponents of
Israeli policy over the years could not have known the depths to which
Israeli society had sunken. The blistering indictment that I presented
there is so severe as to pose the question as to whether there are still
some redeeming features in Israeli society. Fearing to be misunderstood
on so critical an issue, I wanted to rewrite the English text, though I
knew that, eventually, I would have to come clean and write the sad and
bitter truth for my English readers. I had simply hoped that I could find
a way to balance the indictment by finding a few just people and events in
Sodom. If you have not noticed we are in Sodom and Gomorrah.
Three items in the news yesterday showed me that I was silly and naïve.
Item one revealed that Dan Halutz, the IDF Chief of Staff had called his
bank at 12:00, three hours after the July 12 incident, in order to sell
all his stocks. The Attorney- General decided that very morning to file
charges against Ha?negbi, one of the leaders of Kadima and the present
chair of the powerful Knesset committee on Security and Foreign Affairs,
for handing out civil service jobs to party hacks. On the same morning,
the police requested the Attorney-General to file charges against Haim
Ramon, the Minister of Justice (!), for sexual harassment.
Of course, these gentlemen richly deserve the anguish and humiliation that
they should be feeling (but do not be certain they do feel anything of the
sort). Moreover, this is just one more instance of some flotsam and
jetsam being expunged from dark and deep currents.
The plain fact of the matter is that, even as consistent political and
moral opponents of the Israeli regime, we did not and could not have known
that the rot and the decay in the interstices of Israeli society had
proceeded to a level that challenges the imagination.
Of course, we are not concerned with the peccadilloes of this or that
politician or general. We are concerned with the recent formation of a
national consensus enthusiastically supporting a war that should have been
seen immediately as a wild and irresponsible project launched by
irresponsible politicians and arrogant generals. There is no need to
repeat here all the aspects of this debacle, recognized as such by almost
every part of Israeli society. The details of the disaster are becoming
clearer day by day. But it our duty to ask the more basic question of WHY
this happened! There is a sickness in this land and those who cherish the
land and its people, those who see it as their homeland, cannot avoid
facing the whole truth.
Root Causes ? Real Ones
These, in broad outline, are the root causes of the deep and abiding
crisis in Israeli society.
One: Israeli politics have been thoroughly militarized to the point that
all major issues are analyzed exclusively in military terms and the
employment of brute power. The military and its thought patterns has
permeated the body politic and the civilian echelon rendering civilian
control of the armed forces a sad joke.
The public is led to believe that all problems and difficulties can be
resolved only through the use of force. The assumption is that the IDF,
were it released from moralistic considerations and political wimps
could take care of business. Thus, the persistence of unresolved
difficulties is understood by public as a result of lack of will on the
part of the civilian echelon. In times of tension or military operations,
the first concern of the government is to convince the public that it has
given the military a free hand. The politicians are in mortal fear that
any general accuse the government that prevented the army from reaping the
fruits of victory. All the government has to do is to ?Let the IDF win!?
Two: The pre-existing special alliance between the United States and
Israel has been upgraded. Israel has become a full scale operational
partner in the ?war on terror? and has been assigned specific targets in
the crusade of the Bush administration against the axis of evil. Most
Israelis are convinced that they are receiving fantastic diplomatic,
military and logistical support for doing something that they would have
to do anyway. Indeed, how could Israel not respond with a deep sense of
gratitude and solidarity when the only major superpower deepens the
special alliance and converts it to a mutual interest in battling
?Islamo-Fascism.? Israel believes that, with the security of the U.S.
commitment, its existential problems are over.
The political and military elites, including the intellectuals, who should
know something about the reliability of the United States, have enrolled
Israel in a project that might well end in a major catastrophe. Israel is
quite satisfied with itself about lining up with Bush, though it does not
have the faintest idea of the objectives and the chances of reaching them.
Three: It is impossible to oppress an entire people for 40 years and not
to succumb to the ultimate rationalization for such action. Anti-Arab
racism is endemic in Israeli society. This racism is so pervasive that it
covers the political landscape like a cloud and infects all the thinking
and the attitudes of the overwhelming majority of Israelis. There are
endless variations on the never ending litany of the faults of the Arabs ?
some more sophisticated for the more educated strata and more vocal and
vicious for the masses.
Four: In a society busily engaged in privatizing its very soul, the
concept of dedicated public service becomes anachronistic. Everyone is
involved in his/her own career, looking out for advancement and pursuing
more monetary reward. If you are smart, you understand the value of
public relations. If you want recognition you will find your way to the
media. Truth is irrelevant, and everyone knows that what counts is what
gets to the media.
These broad and far reaching developments: rampant militarism, abject
subservience to Washington, deep seated racism and careerism are the
deeper reasons why Israel embarked on the recent adventure in Lebanon.
Despite the tremendous sigh of relief all over the country after the cease
fire went into place, the hawks, the generals and their stooges are
already explaining that the next round is inevitable and it won?t take
long in coming.
The Risks of Leadership
With a slight nuance here and there, the Zionist left rallied to the flag
of national unity when Olmert and Peretz blew the bugle. However, from the
very beginning there were some brave souls who disassociated themselves
from their leadership by showing up at the demos by thousands of the
militant left which opposed the war from day one.
At a meeting of Peace Now activists on July 24, 2006, there was a clear
division between supporters and opponents of the war. Supporters of the
war rejected a suggestion that Peace Now, at the least, come out in
support of a cease fire. The movement leadership argued that its
supporters would not understand such a position and that it was impossible
to know whether the demand for a cease fire might not help Hezbollah.(!?)
Public opinion counted Peace Now with those sections of the left who had
seen the light and returned to the fold of the nation. But as the war
dragged on and there were signs that victory would be evasive or not be
achieved at all, three central figures of the Zionist left (Amos Oz, A.B.
Yehushua and David Grossman) came out in support of a cease fire on
Sunday, August 6. In parallel development, Peace Now and MERETZ activists
called, in open defiance of their leaderships, for a demonstration on
Thursday, August 11, supporting the demand for a cease-fire. As the week
went on, pressure was building on the recalcitrant leaderships to take a
position. By Thursday morning, the break away, grass roots initiative had
been adopted by both leaderships as an official movement activity calling
for quick end to the war .
During the week, there were insistent rumors that Israel was going to
launch a mass land offensive drive to the Litani River, any minute. This
had the effect of uniting all sections of the Zionist left, which
recognized the move as nothing more that a costly attempt by the IDF to
bolster its sagging prestige.
There are two ways to respond to these events in the peace movement.
One could say, well, better late than never. Another way of looking at
this is to ask what kind of leadership has to be dragged by its rank and
file to the street in order to protest against a government that is
blatantly ignoring the human
There are two ways to respond to these events in the peace movement.
One could say, well, better late than never. Another way of looking at
this is to ask what kind of leadership has to be dragged by its rank and
file to the street in order to protest against a government that is
blatantly ignoring the human costs of an imbecilic war? 
da 
http://www.reuvenkaminer.com/english/
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
http://cubainforma.interfree.it/
il film sul 9/11 : 
http://www.loosechange911.com/
http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/Berlin.jpg
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

articolo interessante, ma mi viene da aggiungere che una società come
la nostra divisa anche sulla logica elementare (come chi vince e chi
perde una guerra) fa abbastanza ridere, speriamo vivamente che lo
stadio attuale dell'umanità venga superato da una successiva
evoluzione o dallo sviluppo di macchine pensanti.