Newsgroup: it.politica
Titolo: Il procuratore generale autorizza indagini "per frode elettorale"

Barr ha autorizzato il Dipartimento di giustizia a indagare su "accuse
 rilevanti " di frode elettorale
 
Tutto questo nonostante non ci siano prove a sostegno delle accuse di frode.
 
La campagna di Donald Trump ha fatto causa al segretario di stato della
 Pennsylvania, Kathy Boockvar, con l'accusa che il sistema di conteggio dei
 voti per posta è stato meno rigoroso di quello dei voti in persona. Un
 "doppio standard" che rappresenta una "violazione costituzionale".
 
Insomma un seguito alle elezioni senza precedenti.
 
Le speranze di Trump sono pressoché Zero.
 
Trump minaccia ed è pronto a vendicarsi licenziando i funzionari facendo
 pressioni indebite.
 
L'audio rubato: chi molla rischia il posto
 
Le elezioni non sono finite: chi abbandona la barca ora rischia il posto di
 lavoro e il suo futuro professionale. Sarebbe l'avvertimento che alti
 funzionari dell'amministrazione Trump in queste ore vanno ripetendo a tutto
 il personale del governo federale americano. Lo riportano il sito Axios e
 il Washington Free Beacon, spiegando come questa direttiva emerge
 chiaramente da un audio rubato durante una conference call con lo staff
 dell'Usaid, l'agenzia federale per lo sviluppo internazionale.
 
Insomma qui potrebbe aprirsi un fronte giudiziario nei Trump per le
 pressioni e le minacce.
 
Tutto questo finirà a metà Dicembre e Trump dovrà rassegnarsi a riconoscere
 la sconfitta. 

Il 10/11/20 07:26, Lo Scopritore /_- ha scritto:

Forse, una settimana, i giudici e gli eventuali procuratori che aprono
un fascicolo, lo decidono in un ora. Come hai già visto dagli altri stati
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/09/politics/election-trump-court-push-claims/index.html
 
davvero qualche ora (!)


Se non ci sono prove evidenti, come sembra, si va verso un'archiviazione. 

Il 10/11/20 08:27, Lo Scopritore /_- ha scritto:

Penso che vengano dibattute tutte, ma davvero in un ora, qualcuna anche
respinta, ti ho evidenziato gli stati con gli *asterischi*...
(dalla CNN
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/06/politics/trump-and-gop-lawsuits-to-challenge-election-flail-in-court/index.html
)
 
 (CNN)The Trump campaign and President Donald Trump peppered Thursday
with tweets and news conferences boasting of success in courts as states
continue to count ballots, but the legal efforts repeatedly failed to
gain traction or affect significant enough numbers of votes, if any, in
key states.
Several of the active cases centered on Pennsylvania and Philadelphia,
specifically, where vote counters throughout the day continued to tally
numbers of absentee ballots that cut Trump's lead in the state dramatically.
Biden eyes 270 as he gains on Trump in Pennsylvania and Georgia
Biden eyes 270 as he gains on Trump in Pennsylvania and Georgia
Trump's few wins in court have largely been on procedural measures on
issues that could affect minuscule numbers of ballots, or like in one
Pennsylvania case, about relatively inconsequential issues such as
allowing campaign canvass observers to stand slightly closer to ballot
processers. In several courts in recent days, judges have been
exasperated with the Trump campaign and Republicans' arguments.
 
In one case the Trump campaign filed in federal court on Thursday in
*Pennsylvania*, Judge Paul Diamond, a George W. Bush appointee, set a
tone almost immediately with sarcasm, telling the Trump campaign lawyer,
"Well, you have your hearing."
By the end of the hearing, the Trump campaign lawyer had admitted,
contrary to his initial complaint, that observers for the campaign were
in the room to watch ballot canvassing in Philadelphia.
The judge asked Philadelphia city officials to confirm Democrats and
Republicans were being treated fairly to watch the ballot-counting and
that they were allowed to watch the counting in the city from 6 feet
away. He noted the case appeared to be an appeal of a state issue --
making it completely out of place for a federal court to handle.
When the Trump campaign lawyer spoke up to say he had "another problem"
with the ballot observation, Diamond, the judge, cut him off, asking,
"Length and width? Time and place?"
When the judge pressed the Trump campaign lawyer on if there were
observers in the room from the campaign, the lawyer, Jerome Marcus,
said: "There's a non-zero number of people in the room."
At another point, when Marcus handed the judge a hand-drawn map of the
ballot counting room, Diamond cracked that the lawyer should keep his
day job.
 
It wasn't the first sketch of a map introduced this week. In a *Nevada*
Supreme Court case filed on Election Day, lawyers representing the Trump
campaign similarly submitted a hand-drawn map of a ballot processing
room as evidence -- an unusual approach in any case.
Election lawsuits filed on Election Day often have some air of
informality, given the need for quick action. But several election law
experts have been critical of the lack of serious legal arguments that
representatives of the Trump campaign are making in recent days -- with
some court filings not even containing evidence or assertions of fact at
all.
 
In other states where the vote was still close, judges dismissed new
Trump or Republican cases quickly on Thursday.
*Georgia* Judge James F. Bass on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit filed a
day earlier by state Republicans to prevent the "unlawful counting of
ballots received after the election" in Savannah, after a poll watcher
for the party allegedly viewed unprocessed absentee ballots mixed in
with absentee ballots that were set to be tabulated.
And in *Michigan*, a state court judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit
brought by the Trump campaign that asked for an immediate halt to the
vote counting until its representatives had "meaningful" access to
ballot counting and adjudication.
Judge Cynthia Stephens was highly skeptical throughout the virtual
hearing about the lack of admissible evidence in the case and whether
the campaign had sued the right party, the secretary of state.
 
"What I have is, at best, a hearsay affidavit that addresses a harm that
would be significant," said Stephens. "We've got an affidavit that is
not firsthand knowledge."
She said she was not convinced the campaign's claims could succeed in
court.
 
Qualcuna dibattuta, e qualcuna "dismissed", *respinta*, come puoi notare
l'hanno già fatto, negli stati dove ci potevano essere dei dubbi, adesso
gli rimane solo la Corte Suprema ed anche li, penso oggi, questo
pomeriggio, ora italiana, gli andrà male in un oretta, questo di nuovo
per la Pennsylvania.
Poi, sta facendo del terrorismo psicologico sui funzionari di stato, ma
vedriai che tutto per la fine di questa settimana sarà risolto (!)
 
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/29/politics/mail-in-ballots-supreme-court-pennsylvania-wisconsin-north-carolina/index.html
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/07/us/politics/the-supreme-court-hands-trump-a-small-victory-in-pennsylvanias-vote-count.html
 


Finira' sconfitto, lo e' gia', e pure disonorato.
