Newsgroup: it.politica
Titolo: Global Warming Theory Has Failed

Global Warming Theory Has Failed
 
(1) Warming not 'global'. It is shown in satellite data to be northern
hemisphere only
 
(2) It is now not warming. Warming (global mean and northern hemisphere)
stopped in the 1990s
 
(3) Models suggest atmosphere should warm 20% faster than surface but
surface warming was 33% faster during the time satellites and surface
observations used. This suggests GHG theory wrong, and surface temperature
contaminated.
 
 
(4) Temperatures longer term have been modified to enhance warming trend and
minimize cyclical appearance. Station dropout, missing data, change of local
siting, urbanization, instrumentation contaminate the record, producing
exaggerating warming. The GAO scolded NOAA for poor compliance with siting
standards.
 
...................
 
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/05/global-warming-theory-has-failed-all-tests-so-alarmists-return-to-the-97-consensus-hoax/
 
 
 
 

 Global Warming Theory Has Failed
 
Cazzo te ne frega del global warming?
Se la terra si scaldasse troppo tu sei l'unico fortunato che puo' 
svignarsela usando la mitica astronave PNNN.
 
Mi ci porti a fare un giro?
 
 
-- 
"Contro la stupiditï¿œ, neanche gli dei possono lottare."
[Friedrich von Schiller - "Giovanna d'Arco", Atto III, Scena 6]

 
 
È abbottonatissimo!
Che siamo veramente alla vigilia della rivoluzione copernicana della PNNN
e laureti si stia preparando per un clamoroso expoit?

 e laureti si stia preparando per un clamoroso expoit?
 
Secondo me bluffa: la foto che ti ha postato e' vecchissima e sembra 
piu' la pubblicita' di una marca di condom che un prototipo di astronave.
 
L'alternativa e' che abbia firmato l'esclusiva per la pubblicazione 
delle foto con Gente Motori e che debba pagare delle penali se fa 
trapelare qualche anteprima...
 
 
-- 
"Contro la stupidit�, neanche gli dei possono lottare."


 Secondo me bluffa:
 
From N.A. n.138
 
...........
 
Thank you for your e-mail of December 5, 2013 to NASA.
 
 
 
Under Federal regulation, NASA is authorized to accept technical proposals
for evaluation only under one of two conditions:  ............
Your interest in NASA and America's space program is greatly appreciated.
 
............
 
 
http://www.asps.it/vol33.htm
 
 
 
 

 Your interest in NASA and America's space program is greatly appreciated.
 
Grande!
Ho una domanda per te: hai gia' scelto chi fara' il catering quando 
inizieranno i voli di linea?
 
 
-- 
"Contro la stupiditï¿œ, neanche gli dei possono lottare."


 
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/05/global-warming-theory-has-failed-
 
all-tests-so-alarmists-return-to-the-97-consensus-hoax/
 
Ormai il riscaldamento globale dovuto a attivitï¿œ umane ï¿œ diventato una 
religione.
 
La frase piï¿œ significativa dell'articolo ï¿œ questa, di Michael Crichton:
 
ï¿œHistorically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of 
scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is 
already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on 
something or other, reach for your wallet, because youï¿œre being had. 
Letï¿œs be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with 
consensus. Consensus is the business of politics.ï¿œ Michael Crichton 17 
January 2003 speech at the California Institute of Technology
 
-- 
questo messaggio ï¿œ frutto di fantasia e non riferito a 
personaggi reali. Serve solo per riflettere.
PADANIA LIBERA.
 

Il giorno mercoledì 15 gennaio 2014 13:04:02 UTC+1, el_gato ha scritto:
 
Nonostante la citazione inglese, è una STRONZATA.
 
La SCIENZA si basa cul consenso, ma sul consenso di scienziati che provano e riprovano per dimostrare che sbagli. 
Se non ci riescono ecco che hai il CONSENSO. Fino a che qualcuno non provi che sbagli, se mai ci riuscirà.
 
Milioni di scienziati lavorano in questo modo, per questo oggi la scienza è l'unica lingua universale del pianeta. Unisce tutti coloo CHE SANNO e lasciano da parte le frange di ignoranti, fanatici, e CREDULONI CREDENTI.

 ha scritto nel messaggio 
news:08502b44-2ce7-460c...@googlegroups.com...
Il giorno mercoled� 15 gennaio 2014 13:04:02 UTC+1, el_gato ha scritto:
 
Nonostante
 
tu sia un ciarlatano e imbecille integrale
 
 
Dr Richard Feynman, Cornell Physicist in a lecture explained how theorys
that failed the test of data or experiment are falsified ("wrong") and must
be discarded.
 
Global Warming Theory Has Failed
 
(1) Warming not 'global'. It is shown in satellite data to be northern
hemisphere only
 
(2) It is now not warming. Warming (global mean and northern hemisphere)
stopped in the 1990s
 
(3) Models suggest atmosphere should warm 20% faster than surface but
surface warming was 33% faster during the time satellites and surface
observations used. This suggests GHG theory wrong, and surface temperature
contaminated.
 
 
(4) Temperatures longer term have been modified to enhance warming trend and
minimize cyclical appearance. Station dropout, missing data, change of local
siting, urbanization, instrumentation contaminate the record, producing
exaggerating warming. The GAO scolded NOAA for poor compliance with siting
standards.
 
(5) Those who create the temperature records have been shown in analysis and
emails to take steps to eliminate inconvenient temperature trends like the
Medieval Warm Period, the 1940s warm blip and cooling since 1998. Steps have
included removal of the urban heat island adjustment and as Wigley suggested
in a climategate email, introduce 0.15C of artificial cooling of global
ocean temperatures near 1940.
 
(6) Forecast models have failed with temperature trends below even the
assumed zero emission control scenarios
 
(7) Climate models all have a strong hot spot in the mid to high troposphere
in the tropical regions. Weather balloons and satellite show no warming in
this region the last 30 years.
 
(8) Ocean heat content was forecast to increase and was said to be the
canary in the coal mine. It too has stalled according to NOAA PMEL. The
warming was to be strongest in the tropics where the models were warming the
atmosphere the most. No warming has been shown in the top 300 meters in the
tropical Pacific back to the 1950s.
 
(9) Alarmists had predicted permanent El Nino but the last decade has
featured 7 La Nina and just 3 El Nino years. This is related to the PDO and
was predicted by those who look at natural factors.
 
(10) Alarmists had predicted much lower frequency of the negative modes of
the AO and NAO due to warming. The trend has been the opposite with a record
negative AO/NAO in 2009/10
 
(11) Alarmists predicted an increase in hurricane frequency and strength
globally but the global activity had diminished after 2005 to a 30+ year
low. The U.S. has gone seven consecutive years without a landfalling major
hurricane, the longest stretch since the 1860s
 
(12) Alarmists have predicted a significant increase in heat records but
despite heat last two summers, the 1930s to 1950s still greatly dominated
the heat records. Even in Texas at the center of the 2011 heat wave, the
long term (since 1895) trends in both temperature and precipitation are
flat. And when stations with over 80 years of temperature data were
considered, the number of heat records last July were not extraordinary
relative to past hot summers.
 
(13) Extremes of rainfall and drought were predicted to increase but except
during periods of strong El Nino and La Nina, no trends are seen
 
(14) Alarmists indicated winter would become warmer and short. The last 15
years has seen a decline in winter temperatures in all regions. In places
winter have been the coldest and longest in decades and even centuries.
 
(15) Alarmists had indicated snow would become increasingly rare in middle
latitudes especially in the big cities where warming would be greatest. All
time snow records were set in virtually all the major cities and northern
hemisphere snow coverage in winter has increased with 4 of the top 5 years
since 2007/08. Also among the east coast high impact snowstorms tracked by
NOAA (NESIS), 11 of the 46 have occurred since 2009.
 
(16) Alarmists had indicated a decline of Antarctic ice due to warming.  The
upward trends since 1979 continues.
 
(17) Alarmists had indicated Greenland and arctic ice melt would accelerate.
The arctic ice tracks with the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation and the
IARC shows the ice cover was similarly reduced in the 1950s when the
Atlantic was last in a similar warm mode. In Greenland, the warmth of the
1930s and 1940s still dominates the records and longer term temperatures
have declined.
 
(18) Sea level rise was to accelerate upward due to melting ice and warming.
Sea levels actually slowed in the late 20th century and have declined or
flattened the last few years. Manipulation of data (adjustment for land
rises following the last glaciation) has been applied to hide this from the
public.
 
(19) Alarmists claimed that drought western snowpack would diminish and
forest fires would increase in summer. Snowpack and water equivalent were at
or near record levels in recent winters from Alaska to the Pacific Northwest
and Northern Rockies. Glaciers are advancing.  Fires have declined.
 
(20) Alaska was said to be warming with retreating glaciers. But that
warming is tied intimately to the PDO and thr North Pacific pattern NP and
happens instantly with the flips from cold to warm and warm to cold. Two of
the coldest and snowiest winters on records occurred since the PDO/NP
flipped cold again (2007/08 and 2011/12). January 2012 was the coldest on
record in many towns and cities and snowfall was running 160 inches above
normal in parts of the south. Anchorage Alaska set an all time record for
seasonal snow in 2011/12. In 2007/08, glaciers all advanced for the first
time since the Little Ice Age. In 2011/12, the Bering Sea ice set a new high
in the satellite era. Latest ever ice out date records were set in May 2013.
 
(21) Mt. Kilimanjaro glacier was to disappear due to global warming.
Temperatures show no warming in recent decades. The reduction in glacial ice
was due to deforestation near the base and the state of the AMO. The
glaciers have advanced again in recent years
 
(22) Polar bears were claimed to be threatened. Polar bear populations
instead have increased to record levels and threaten the populace.
 
(23) Australian drought was forecast to become permanent. Steps to protect
against floods were defunded. Major flooding did major damage and rainfall
has been abundant in recent years tied to the PDO and La Nina as predicted
by honest scientists in Australia. All years with La Nina and cold PDO
composited show this rainfall. Drought was associated with El Ninos and warm
PDO fro 1977 to 1998
 
(24) The office of the Inspector General report found that the EPA cut
corners and short-circuited the required peer review process for its
December 2009 endangerment finding, which is the foundation for EPA's plan
to regulate greenhouse gases. The Government Accountability Office (GAO)
report confirmed that EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)
program-which EPA acknowledges is the "scientific foundation for
decisions" - is flawed, echoing previous concerns from the National Academy
of Sciences (NAS) that the agency is basing its decisions on shoddy
scientific work.
 
(25) Of 18,531 citations in the 2007 IPCC Assessment Report, 5,587 or 30%
were non-peer-reviewed material, including activist tracts, press releases,
and in one amazing case, "Version One" of a Draft. In important instances,
IPCC lead authors chose non-peer-reviewed material, or papers of low
credibility, favoring their argument, in the face of prolific peer-reviewed
material to the contrary. Instances include alleged climate relevance to
malaria, hurricanes, species extinction, and sea levels
 
 
 
...................
 
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/05/global-warming-theory-has-failed-all-tests-so-alarmists-return-to-the-97-consensus-hoax/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 questo messaggio � frutto di fantasia e non riferito a



Quindi gli hai scritto, e ti hanno rimbalzato con la classica formula 
"Si, molto bello, purtroppo a causa della supercazzola non possiamo 
considerarla, ma grazie per l'interesse, nel caso ci faremo sentire noi eh?"
 
Grande risultato.
 
saluti
mm
 


 
No, credo che sia impegnato ad integrare la "timone del signore" con 
l'E-Cat, in una sinergia tutta italiana.
 
saluti
mm

 stopped in the 1990s
 
ROTFL!