Newsgroup: it.politica
Titolo: Bill Lind BLASTS Political Correctness (2/3)

*Message and author protected by the 1st amendment (free speech) and similar
constitutional provisions. Violations of this provision through actions by
judiciary and other government criminals will be prosecuted as soon as
conditions permit.*
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATEkMUygPdU
But the parallels are not accidents. The parallels did not come from 
nothing. The fact of the matter is that Political Correctness has a history, 
a history that is much longer than many people are aware of outside a small 
group of academics who have studied this. And the history goes back, as I 
said, to World War I, as do so many of the pathologies that are today 
bringing our society, and indeed our culture, down.
Marxist theory said that when the general European war came (as it did come 
in Europe in 1914), the working class throughout Europe would rise up and 
overthrow their governments - the bourgeois governments - because the 
workers had more in common with each other across the national boundaries 
than they had in common with the bourgeoisie and the ruling class in their 
own country. Well, 1914 came and it didn't happen. Throughout Europe, 
workers rallied to their flag and happily marched off to fight each other. 
The Kaiser shook hands with the leaders of the Marxist Social Democratic 
Party in Germany and said there are no parties now, there are only Germans. 
And this happened in every country in Europe. So something was wrong.
Marxists knew by definition it couldn't be the theory. In 1917, they finally 
got a Marxist coup in Russia and it looked like the theory was working, but 
it stalled again. It didn't spread and when attempts were made to spread 
immediately after the war, with the Spartacist uprising in Berlin, with the 
Bela Kun government in Hungary, with the Munich Soviet, the workers didn't 
support them.
So the Marxists' had a problem. And two Marxist theorists went to work on 
it: Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg Lukacs in Hungary. Gramsci said the 
workers will never see their true class interests, as defined by Marxism, 
until they are freed from Western culture, and particularly from the 
Christian religion - that they are blinded by culture and religion to their 
true class interests. Lukacs, who was considered the most brilliant Marxist 
theorist since Marx himself, said in 1919, "Who will save us from Western 
Civilization?" He also theorized that the great obstacle to the creation of 
a Marxist paradise was the culture: Western civilization itself.
Lukacs gets a chance to put his ideas into practice, because when the home 
grown Bolshevik Bela Kun government is established in Hungary in 1919, he 
becomes deputy commissar for culture, and the first thing he did was 
introduce sex education into the Hungarian schools. This ensured that the 
workers would not support the Bela Kun government, because the Hungarian 
people looked at this aghast, workers as well as everyone else. But he had 
already made the connection that today many of us are still surprised by, 
that we would consider the "latest thing."
In 1923 in Germany, a think-tank is established that takes on the role of 
translating Marxism from economic into cultural terms, that creates 
Political Correctness as we know it today, and essentially it has created 
the basis for it by the end of the 1930s. This comes about because the very 
wealthy young son of a millionaire German trader by the name of Felix Weil 
has become a Marxist and has lots of money to spend. He is disturbed by the 
divisions among the Marxists, so he sponsors something called the First 
Marxist Work Week, where he brings Lukacs and many of the key German 
thinkers together for a week, working on the differences of Marxism.
And he says, "What we need is a think-tank." Washington is full of think 
tanks and we think of them as very modern. In fact they go back quite a 
ways. He endows an institute, associated with Frankfurt University, 
established in 1923, that was originally supposed to be known as the 
Institute for Marxism. But the people behind it decided at the beginning 
that it was not to their advantage to be openly identified as Marxist. The 
last thing Political Correctness wants is for people to figure out it's a 
form of Marxism. So instead they decide to name it the Institute for Social 
Research.
Weil is very clear about his goals. In 1971, he wrote to Martin Jay the 
author of a principle book on the Frankfurt School, as the Institute for 
Social Research soon becomes known informally, and he said, "I wanted the 
institute to become known, perhaps famous, due to its contributions to 
Marxism." Well, he was successful. The first director of the Institute, Carl 
Grunberg, an Austrian economist, concluded his opening address, according to 
Martin Jay, "by clearly stating his personal allegiance to Marxism as a 
scientific methodology." Marxism, he said, would be the ruling principle at 
the Institute, and that never changed.?The initial work at the Institute was 
rather conventional, but in 1930 it acquired a new director named Max 
Horkheimer, and Horkheimer's views were very different. He was very much a 
Marxist renegade. The people who create and form the Frankfurt School are 
renegade Marxists. They're still very much Marxist in their thinking, but 
they're effectively run out of the party. Moscow looks at what they are 
doing and says, "Hey, this isn't us, and we're not going to bless this."
Horkheimer's initial heresy is that he is very interested in Freud, and the 
key to making the translation of Marxism from economic into cultural terms 
is essentially that he combined it with Freudism. Again, Martin Jay writes, 
"If it can be said that in the early years of its history, the Institute 
concerned itself primarily with an analysis of bourgeois society's 
socio-economic sub-structure," - and I point out that Jay is very 
sympathetic to the Frankfurt School, I'm not reading from a critic here - 
"in the years after 1930 its primary interests lay in its cultural 
superstructure. Indeed the traditional Marxist formula regarding the 
relationship between the two was brought into question by Critical Theory."
-- 
Unter blinden ist der ein ugige k nig.   >.)
Jews have paralysed our societies through the enforcement of PC (
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6j6vr94
 ) and MC (
http://preview.tinyurl.com/46j2gzn
 ). Chieftain Netanyahu: Break the spell
by publicly admitting your tribe's responsibility! And dump your mad dog
Martin van Creveld ( 
http://preview.tinyurl.com/5vutnfl
 ).

"Michael Laudahn eOpposition" <nuke.is...@your.earliest.conv> ha 
scritto
cut
gheddafy ci protegge dal terorismo islamico! grazie gheddy