Newsgroup: it.politica
Titolo: Putin al Valday sputtana gli ebrei che hanno distrutto la Russia classica

Sempre interessante Vladimir
La Russia era un paese vergine e con enormi potenzialita' di sviluppo
Qualcuno ci ha messo sopra gli occhie e diverse volte ha temtato
Aprofittando della guerra han messo in pratica i protocolli dei savi di 
Sion
Qua si apre una domanda, son stati gli ebrei autonomamente, o son stati 
gli ebrei usati dal mondo anglosassone ?
Oppure .........
 
A scandal arose this week as President Putin took some time to denounce 
the Bolshevik Revolution at the Valdai Discussion Club saying:
 
“Just over a century ago, Russia objectively faced serious problems… 
Russia could have dealt with its problems gradually and in a civilised 
manner. But revolutionary shocks led to the collapse and disintegration 
of a great power… These examples from our history allow us to say that 
revolutions are not a way to settle a crisis but a way to aggravate it. 
No revolution was worth the damage it did to the human potential.”
 
How could a statesman so critical of the abuses of capitalism, and so 
masterful in combatting structures of modern imperialism, bemoan the 
Bolshevik revolution which gave rise to Soviet Russia? Doesn’t Putin 
respect Soviet Russian accomplishments including the sacrifices made to 
put down Hitler? How could Putin be a true anti-imperialist if he is an 
anti-revolutionary?
 
To do my part in resolving this paradox, let me begin by saying: it 
isn’t a paradox.
 
The fact is that Vladimir Putin is both an anti-imperialist, and also a 
revolutionary, just not in the way you might imagine. To understand 
what I mean, a certain lesson into recent history is in order.
 
Aborting a System of Win-Win Cooperation
 
The sad fact is that neither the Bolsheviks nor Mensheviks which 
emerged onto the stage of history at the turn of the 20th century were 
organically arising “peoples’ movements”.
 
Upon deeper analysis conducted by historians like Anthony Sutton, Kerry 
Bolton, and Robert Cowley, both organizations which eventually merged 
into a singular force, enjoyed vast financial patronage of western 
imperial powerhouses such as Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff (head of Kuhn, 
Loeb & co.) and even Lord Alfred Milner- head of the newly formed Round 
Table Movement.
 
These characters bankrolled much of the Bolshevik movement as early as 
1905 in order to destroy a truly revolutionary process that was 
spreading across much of the world in the wake of the Civil War.
 
One of the leading champions of this revolutionary process was 
Lincoln’s former bodyguard and the first Governor of Colorado William 
Gilpin. Governor Gilpin envisioned a world of sovereign nation states 
united by rail lines stretching through the Bering Strait and bringing 
all the continents and cultures into harmonious co-existence. In his 
famous 1890 ‘Cosmopolitan Railway’ Gilpin stated:
 
“The cosmopolitan railway will make the whole world one community. It 
will reduce the separate nations to families of our great nation… From 
extended intercommunication will arise a wider intercourse of human 
ideas and as the result, logical and philosophical reciprocities, which 
will become the germs for innumerable new developments; for in the 
track of intercommunication, enterprise and invention invariably follow 
and whatever facilitates one stimulates every other agency of 
progress.”
 
Why Putin Criticized the Bolshevik Counter Revolution: Trotsky, Parvus 
and the War on Civilization
 
Describing the obvious brotherhood of Russia and the USA in 
spearheading this project, Gilpin wrote:
 
“It is a simple and plain proposition, that Russia and the United 
States, each having broad, uninhabited areas and limitless undeveloped 
resources, would by the expenditure of two or three hundred millions 
apiece for a highway of the nations through their now waste places, add 
a hundred fold to their wealth and power and influence. Nations which 
can spend in war their thousands of lives- the lives of the best and 
bravest of their sons and citizens- can surely afford a little of their 
surplus wealth and energy for such a work as this.” [p.35]

Scriveva Arturo Friday, 11/5/2021:

The American System Goes Global
 
Gilpin was not alone in this vision.
 
In fact, he represented a network of statesmen spread all across the 
globe who recognized that the only way to break out of the endless 
cycle of wars, usury and corruption which the Hobbesian structures of 
the British Empire maintained globally was through the adoption of an 
anti-Free Trade system known as “The American System of Political 
Economy”. This was a very different concept of “America” than the Pax 
Americana which has run roughshod over the world since WWII.
 
In Russia, this process found its champion in the figure of Sergei 
Witte (Finance Minister and Minister of Transportation from 1892-1903) 
who led a faction of the Russian intelligentsia in a struggle for 
progress and cooperation both internally and with allied nations 
against powerful forces committed to feudalism both within the Russian 
oligarchy and externally. The regressive forces which Witte had to 
contend with included powerful reactionary traditionalist forces who 
yearned for the good old days before Czar Alexander II freed the serfs 
and on the other extreme, the emergence of vast clusters of anarchist 
movements threatening to burn down the state in a replication of the 
Jacobin frenzy of the French revolution.
 
As Martin Sieff has demonstrated through his many writings on Prince 
Kropotkin, many of these anarchist networks enjoyed the patronage of 
powerful forces that cared little for the plight of the working class.
 
The international spread of the American System between 1876-1905 took 
the form of large-scale industrialisation and railroads. The funding 
mechanism was located in a practice that has fallen out of favor in the 
west (although has made a powerful comeback in China in recent years) 
called ‘dirigisme’- the emission of productive credit from state banks.
 
Why Putin Criticized the Bolshevik Counter Revolution: Trotsky, Parvus 
and the War on Civilization
 
It was Witte who had spearheaded the Trans Siberian railway’s 
construction between 1890-1905 with plans to extend rail lines to China 
and beyond utilizing state directed capital and a blend of private 
enterprise. A fuller exposition of Witte’s fight will be unveiled in 
the next installment.
 
The British Empire which always relied on keeping nations divided, 
underdeveloped and dependent on the use of maritime shipping was not 
amused.
 
By controlling the international maritime choke points, the tiny island 
was able to exert its influence across the globe. Through the vigorous 
enforcement of laissez-faire doctrines of free trade, nations were 
blocked from protecting themselves from the financial warfare launched 
by the city of London against victim states (speculative volatility, 
usury, cheap dumping, cash cropping and drug running). Anyone wishing 
to engage in long term planning in the building up of the land-based 
transport corridors via rail, roads and industry would be easily 
sabotaged if the British System were shaping their world.
 
The international movement to break this system of evil was the only 
real revolutionary process animating the world during this time.
 
The Bolshevik Counter-Revolution: An Anglo-American Fraud
 
In 1905, Wall Street financier Jacob Schiff had given $200 million to 
the Japanese to assist their victory against the Russians during the 
1904-05 Russo Japanese war. This generosity ultimately earned the 
banker the Medal of the Rising Sun in the in the Meiji Palace in 1907.
 
After crippling the Russian state and military (it’s navy was wiped out 
during the war), Schiff turned his attention to financing revolutionary 
activities within Russia itself. How money was spent by Schiff was 
difficult to say until 1949, when Schiff’s grandson John Schiff bragged 
to the New York Journal that his grandfather had given $20 million “for 
the triumph of communism in Russia.”
 
American journalist, and Schiff asset George Kennan played an 
instrumental role as perception manager of the revolution and bragged 
that he had converted 52,000 Russian soldiers imprisoned in Japan into 
Bolshevik revolutionaries. A March 24, 1917 interview recorded in the 
New York Times celebrating the revolution read:
 
“Mr. Kennan told of the work of the Friends of Russian Freedom in the 
revolution. He said that during the Russian-Japanese war he was in 
Tokyo, and that he was permitted to make visits among the 12,000 
Russian prisoners in Japanese hands at the end of the first year of the 
war. He had conceived the idea of putting revolutionary propaganda into 
the hands of the Russian army.
 
The Japanese authorities favoured it and gave him permission. After 
which he sent to America for all the Russian revolutionary literature 
to be had…
 
‘The movement was financed by a New York banker you all know and love,’ 
he said, referring to Mr Schiff, ‘and soon we received a ton and a half 
of Russian revolutionary propaganda. At the end of the war 50,000 
Russian officers and men went back to their country ardent 
revolutionists. The Friends of Russian Freedom had sowed 50,000 seeds 
of liberty in 100 Russian regiments. I do not know how many of these 
officers and men were in the Petrograd fortress last week, but we do 
know what part the army took in the revolution.’ “
 
Schiff himself jubilantly stated to the New York Times, March 18, 1917:
 
“May I through your columns give expression to my joy that the Russian 
nation, a great and good people, have at last effected their 
deliverance from centuries of autocratic oppression and through an 
almost bloodless revolution have now come into their own. Praised be 
God on high!”
 
Historian Kerry Bolton wrote of New York Federal Reserve director 
William Boyce Thompson who had been installed as head of the American 
Red Cross during the 1917 revolution and was largely recognized as the 
true U.S. ambassador to the government, saying:
 
“Thompson set himself up in royal manner in Petrograd reporting 
directly to Pres. Wilson and bypassing U.S. Ambassador Francis. 
Thompson provided funds from his own money, first to the Social 
Revolutionaries, to whom he gave one million rubles, and shortly after 
$1,000,000 to the Bolsheviks to spread their propaganda to Germany and 
Austria.”
 
Writing in 1962, historian Arsene de Goulevitch who experienced the 
events of 1917 firsthand wrote:
 
“In private interviews, I have been told that over 21 million rubles 
were spent by Lord Alfred Milner in financing the Russian Revolution… 
The financier just mentioned was by no means alone among the British to 
support the Russian revolution with large financial donations.” (1)
 
According to his own accounts, during the four months Leon Trotsky 
spent in New York in 1917, much of it was spent hobnobbing with the 
upper crust of Wall Street and being driven around in limousines (2).


Il 11/5/2021, Arturo ha detto :

Leon Trotsky’s Immortal Treachery
 
Leon Trotsky, who Lord Milner, Schiff, Paul Warburg etc always intended 
to be the leader of the movement that would take control over the dead 
bodies of the Romanovs, was fortunately ousted by the saner forces 
around Joseph Stalin in 1927.
 
As historian Grover Furr masterfully documents using recently 
declassified material, testimonies and other evidence from archives in 
the USA and Russia, Leon Trotsky made several attempts to return to 
power in Russia after his expulsion. He didn’t do this alone however, 
but largely with the help of fascist forces in Britain, Japan, Ukraine, 
and Germany all the way until the moment he met his untimely end in 
1940. This will be the subject of a future review of Grover Furr’s work 
(3).
 
For all of Lenin’s many problems, he differed from Trotsky on two 
interconnected points of 1) a general belief in voluntarism and 2) a 
rejection of the theory of permanent revolution.
 
Where Lenin believed that productive labor could be channeled towards 
the improvement of productive forces of society, Trotsky believed that 
any such effort at peaceful productive improvement would lead only to 
decadence. Permanent revolution was thus needed to keep workers from 
falling into sloth amidst the eternal striving for global class 
struggle. In 1914, a frustrated Lenin spoke of Trotsky’s fetish saying: 
“he [Trotsky] deserted the Mensheviks and occupied a vacillating 
position, now co-operating with Martynov (the economist), now 
proclaiming his absurdly Left ‘permanent revolution’ theory.”
 
Another point of conflict between Lenin on the one side and Trotsky on 
the other centered on whether or not Russia should continue to 
participate in WWI.
 
Where Lenin wanted to bring Russia out of the insane conflict in the 
first moments of their coup in 1917, Trotsky and his close ally 
Bukharin demanded that Russia stay in the war with the aim of 
converting it into a total pan European (and ultimately global) 
revolution. Trotsky’s commitment to global socialist revolution vs 
Stalin’s commitment to “socialism in one country” was at the heart of 
an unbridgeable divide between the two revolutionaries throughout the 
years.
 
Parvus and the Pan-European Union
 
Trotsky’s close association with Alexander Israel Helphand (aka: 
Parvus) throughout the revolution of 1905 and beyond is also suspicious 
and should be considered in the context of a much broader imperial 
geopolitical strategy.
 
Parvus’ association with the Pan-European Union founded by Count 
Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi in 1923 is another relevant anomaly that 
takes us into the deeper power structures lurking below the surface 
waves of history (4).
 
Other members of Coudenhove-Kalergi’s institution included likes of 
Benito Mussolini, Walter Lippman, Nazi finance minister Hjalmar Schacht 
and Nazi geopolitician Karl Haushofer, while financiers Max Warburg, 
Louis de Rothschild openly bankrolled the organization.
 
In 1932, Kalergi delivered a speech celebrating the great restoration 
of order that would emerge in the unified pan-European effort to put 
down Bolshevik anarchism saying: “This eternal war can end only with 
the constitution of a world republic…. The only way left to save the 
peace seems to be a politic of peaceful strength, on the model of the 
Roman Empire, that succeeded in having the longest period of peace in 
the west thanks to the supremacy of his legions.”
 
This group played a much greater role in history than many realize and 
set the stage for the European Union. Parvus’ close association with 
Vladimir Jabotinsky set the stage for the most fascist elements of 
Zionism to emerge in the wake of WWII, and Parvus’ work as propagandist 
and arms dealer for the leadership of the Young Turk movement (deployed 
to set a weakened Ottoman Empire on fire and provoke what became the 
Balkan Wars of 1912-13) can still be felt across the Turkish world to 
this day.
 
Why Putin Criticized the Bolshevik Counter Revolution: Trotsky, Parvus 
and the War on Civilization
 
It is also noteworthy that none other than Otto von Hapsburg himself 
had run this organization for over 30 years and also created a sister 
organization called Dignitae Humanae Institute to ‘united the right of 
the world” under a gnostic Catholic veneer with a Clash of 
Civilizations rebranding for the alt right. As the ultra-liberalized 
dissolution of society proceeds expectedly apace under the moral mush 
of LBGTXYZ gobbledygook, pagan Gaia worship, and critical race theory, 
it is obvious that a knee jerk leap into radical conservativism will 
accelerate. Hence, a net has been cast to catch conservative fish.
 
Located in an 800 year old monastery in Trisulti, Otto Hapsburg’s 
organization has found a useful frontman in the form of a Jesuitical 
fascist right-wing priest of the American alt-right by the name of… 
Steve Bannon. (5) Per gli amici Banny

 Sion 
 
I protocolli dei Savi di Sion, :-) come no! ROTFL
Peccato che Robert Gilpin di cui tu scopiazzi qualcosa senza capire,
non abbia scritto le fregnacce sui Savi di Sion o che "gli ebrei hanno distrutto 
la Russia classica".
La "Russia classica" ROTFL.
Ignorantello orecchiante, che d'è?
 
Ma non lo dice nemmeno Vladimir Putin.
 
Se tu capissi il russo, testolina d'uccello, potresti comprendere qualcosa
dalle tre ore e mezzo d'intervento del 20 ottobre di Vladimir Putin al Valdai 
Discussion Club meeting.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTm-YfBLpr8
 
 
Che non tratta, cazzaro, dei savi di Sion o degli ebrei.
Questi sono unicamente il risultato della tua paranoia delirante.
 
Cazzaro, un suggerimento: limitati alle sciocchezze del gobbo e 
fregnacce simili.
 
brif

Arturo scriveva il 11/5/2021 :

Porello l'ebreo meticcio, e' preoccupato.
 
Trotskyites Mutate into Neocons
 
I say this here and now just to draw a parallel in the reader’s mind to 
the strange transmogrification which leading Trotskyists took in the 
USA once their leader’s life was snuffed out in 1940. Trotsky’s body 
wasn’t even cold before such devotees as James Burnham, Max Schachtman, 
Albert Wohlsetter and Irving Kristol abandoned Trotskyite socialism and 
adopted a new rabidly right-wing paradigm, which came to be known as 
‘neo-conservativism’.
 
This poisonous movement grew quickly throughout the Cold War and took 
over the USA over the dead bodies of JFK and his brother while 
unleashing a new global dis-order ‘clash of civilizations’ 
each-against-all logic onto the globe under the watch of the Trilateral 
Commission of Kissinger, Brzezinski and David Rockefeller.
 
I think we can intimate what Trotsky ultimately saw as the final 
destination for his aims of a global revolution of the masses, and 
willingness to collaborate with Nazis to achieve his ends by 
considering the writings of former Trotskyite James Burnham.
 
As Cynthia Chung pointed out in her recent article on the topic, 
Burnham, (Trotsky’s former personal assistant and a man known to many 
as the father of the neocons), saw the resolution to the Manichean 
problem of class struggle and Cold War in a one world fascist 
government. Right before Trotsky’s 1940 death, Burnham wrote an essay 
renouncing Dialectic Materialism in favor of the superior philosophy of 
Bertrand Russell as outlined in the 1913 Principia Scientifica, and 
hence his rebirth as a neocon was ensured (6).
 
The question now sits before us: Was Burnham’s conversion to Russell’s 
worldview inconsistent with the actual goals and mission of Leon 
Trotsky?
 
It is too often forgotten that Leon Trotsky, acting as chairman Of the 
technical and scientific board of industry, quite literally controlled 
all science policy of Russia from 1924-25. During this time, he wrote a 
1924 pamphlet outlining his pro-eugenics vision of the future global 
order that would be brought into existence through the forces of 
Darwinian natural selection saying:
 
“The human species will once more enter into a state of radical 
transformation, and in his own hands, will become an object of the most 
complicated methods of artificial selection and mass psycho-physical 
training. This is entirely in accord with evolution… man will make his 
purpose to master his own feelings, to raise his instincts to a higher 
consciousness… to create a higher social biological type, or if you 
please, a superman.”
 
Whether we consider Trotsky’s relentless efforts to integrate Darwinism 
with Marxist Dialectic Materialism or the Neoconservative commitment to 
a Darwinian survival of the fittest ethic merged with a gnostic 
Christian end times doctrine, the effects are largely identical: Global 
chaos with a supposed point of rapture/synthesis to resolve the chaos 
of the material world. Getting to this destination, whereby a new order 
and new Nietzschean human being were to emerge, simply required a 
cleansing experience.
 
In this sense, Trotsky could be compared to a Russian version of his 
contemporary Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. Where Chardin was 
tasked with merging Darwin’s theory of natural selection into 
Christianity, Trotsky was tasked with merging Darwin’s theory into the 
state religion of Marxist dialectic materialism in Russia. The end 
result in either case was identical.
 
The Frankfurt School Global Revolution
 
That cleansing experience would take the form of ritualistic climax of 
purgative violence which would usher in a state of total despair and 
thus a new scientific priesthood managing the slaves of the other under 
a renewed form of technocratic feudalism. But how would society be 
brought to such a state of despair such that the masses would clamor 
for a new age to be imposed upon them in the form of a one world 
technocratic government?
 
When Christianity, nationalism, and respect for family values still 
governed society, such a state of nihilistic despair requisite to 
achieve this breaking point was more than a little difficult to 
achieve.
 
Here the role of Trotsky’s associates Georg Lukacs, and Willi 
Munzenberg play an important role.
 
Both men were not only radical Bolsheviks but also founders of a new 
organization founded in 1923 known as the Institute for Social research 
founded in Frankfurt Germany, otherwise known as “The Frankfurt 
School”.
 
This group and their role in steering mass education, and culture over 
the ensuing century will be the topic of a future report.

 Porello l'ebreo meticcio, e' preoccupato. 
 
Crei, nonnetto paranoico, che fai, svicoli?
Scrivi la cazzata e poi ti nascondi come un coniglio.
 
A che punto del Valdai Putin avrebbe "sputtanato 
gli ebrei che hanno distrutto la Russia classica"?
E a che punto ha parlato dei protocolli dei Savi di Sion?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTm-YfBLpr8
 
 
Coglionazzo, accetta il suggerimento: curati.
Anche se il tuo è un disturbo delirante piuttosto pesante,
 
 
brif


Post-Script: A Final Word from Putin
 
In the midst of Putin’s Valdai Club speech, the Russian leader (who is 
a revolutionary although he is certainly no Marxist-Leninist) called 
out the social engineers masquerading as revolutionaries and social 
reformers today driving a parallel to the destructive ideology of the 
Bolsheviks of 1917:
 
“The advocates of so-called ‘social progress’ believe they are 
introducing humanity to some kind of a new and better consciousness. 
Godspeed, hoist the flags as we say, go right ahead. The only thing 
that I want to say now is that their prescriptions are not new at all. 
It may come as a surprise to some people, but Russia has been there 
already. After the 1917 revolution, the Bolsheviks, relying on the 
dogmas of Marx and Engels, also said that they would change existing 
ways and customs and not just political and economic ones, but the very 
notion of human morality and the foundations of a healthy society. The 
destruction of age-old values, religion and relations between people, 
up to and including the total rejection of family (we had that, too), 
encouragement to inform on loved ones – all this was proclaimed 
progress and, by the way, was widely supported around the world back 
then and was quite fashionable, same as today. By the way, the 
Bolsheviks were absolutely intolerant of opinions other than theirs.”
 
In the next article, we will explore the fight of Sergei Witte, Dimitry 
Mendeleyev and compare their vision for a world of win-win cooperation 
against the perversion of science and culture envisioned by Trotsky and 
his international imperial co-thinkers.
 
The author recently delivered a lecture on this topic which can be 
viewed here:
 
 
 
Why Putin Criticized the Bolshevik Counter Revolution: Trotsky, Parvus 
and the War on CivilizationNotes
 
(1) Czarism and Revolution, published by Omni Publications in 
Hawthorne, 1962 French edition, pp. 224, 230)
(2) Leon Trotsky: My Life, New York publisher: Scribner’s, 1930, p. 277
(3) One of the best and more recent among Furr’s pioneering writing on 
this topic can be found in his New Evidence of Trotsky’s Conspiracy, 
Erythos Press, 2020. Furr’s website is also an invaluable resource.
(4) Parvus’s association with the Pan European Union and broader 
fascist operations across Turkey and the Middle East is laid out in 
Jeffrey Steinberg’s 2005 report “Cheney Revives Parvus’ Permanent War 
Madness”
(5) This fact gives new meaning to Bannon’s self-characterization as a 
Leninist. In an August 22, 2016 Daily Beast article, journalist Ronald 
Radosh described a conversation he had with Bannon two years earlier 
saying “we had a long talk about his approach to politics. He never 
called himself a “populist” or an “American nationalist,” as so many 
think of him today. “I’m a Leninist,” Bannon proudly proclaimed. 
Shocked, I asked him what he meant.
“Lenin,” he answered, “wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal 
too. I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of 
today’s establishment.”
(6) In his Feb 1940 ‘Science and Style’, Burnham wrote: “Do you wish me 
to prepare a reading list, Comrade Trotsky? It would be long, ranging 
from the work of the brilliant mathematicians and logicians of the 
middle of the last century to one climax in the monumental Principia 
Mathematica of Russell and Whitehead (the historic turning point in 
modern logic), and then spreading out in many directions – one of the 
most fruitful represented by the scientists, mathematicians and 
logicians now cooperating in the new Encyclopedia of Unified Science.”

 In the midst of Putin’s Valdai Club speech,
 
Crei, coglionazzo, invece di continuare a fare chilometrici c&i mi dici 
a quale minuto dello speech Vladimir Putin afferma che "gli ebrei hanno 
distrutto la Russia classica" e  a quale minuto ha parlato dei protocolli 
dei Savi di Sion?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTm-YfBLpr8
 
 
Cmq lo speech del Valdai lo trovi nel web anche in inglese.
Ammesso che tu conosca l'inglese
 
Sei tu che apri un thread dal titolo "Putin al Valday sputtana gli ebrei che
hanno distrutto la Russia classica".
 
Dai Crei, datti da fare.
Oppure preferisci tacere e confermare che sei un cazzaro divorato
da disturbi deliranti sugli ebrei?
 
brif


BEH NON LO DICE CHIARAMENTE,, PUTIN NON è UN CRETINO COME TE, E LO DIMOSTRA IL FATTO CHE SI è SCELTO UN MINISTRO DEGLI ESTERI CHE è SENZA DUBBIO NUMERO UNO DEL PIANETA NEL SUO RUOLO,
MA IL SENSO DI TUTTO IL DISCORSO PORTA UN Pò A QUELLO.
TU LO SAI MA ESSENDO UN UNIVERSALMENTE RICONOSCIUTO FDP, FINGI DI NON CAPIRE, E SPOSTI IL TIRO PER MANDARLA IN VACCA.
E' CLASSICO DEI FDP.
NATURALMENTE NON FREGA UN CAZZO A NESSUNO, TANTOMENO A ME, INDIPERCUI ORA VADO A CORRERE IN MONTAGNA, SPLENDIDA GELIDA MATTINATA!
 
L'IMMORTALE

Scriveva Eugenio Salvini Sunday, 11/7/2021:

Mi piace studiare gli FDP ebrei
 
Tu parli di motocicli e donne.
Loro pensano solo a sputtanarti, di default.
 
Proprio una conformazione mentale alla Dobermann, tu li chiami 
amichevolmente, loro azzannano.
 
Dicono dipenda dalla conformazione del cranio, troppo stretto.
Cervello malato.

 Sempre interessante Vladimir 
 
specie quando avvelenta gli avversari.
 
L'antico gioco di indicare una qualche minoranza
colpevole di ogni sciagura è antico quanto il mondo.
 
Già nel paleolitico lo sciamano era usa indicare un capro espiatrorio
per qualucnque calamitò.
 
STORIA VECCHISSIMA.

 BEH NON LO DICE CHIARAMENTE,, 
 
:-)
Questo ipocritone di Vladimir Putin che anni fa all'inaugurazione della grande Moschea 
di Mosca ebbe a dichiarare che "i terroristi bestemmiano la grande religione dell'Islam" e 
adesso pensa, ma non lo dice, che "gli ebrei hanno distrutto la Russia classica (con) i protocolli 
dei Savi di Sion".
 
Lascia perdere, inferiore, torna con le api e i porci.
Lo sai che quando ti allarghi sui vaccini o adesso sulla Russia ti auto-ricopri di merda?
Sìììì, che lo sai.
D'altra parte con la terza media - forse - fare il bulletto provoca soltanto ilarità.
 
brif


apri la boccuccia........
PLOP!
FA CON CALMA, MASTICA LENTAMENTE E POI BUTTA GIà, FDP..
TI FARà BENE.
 
L'IMMORTALE