Newsgroup: it.politica
Titolo: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition

 wtc2 = cascadeTime 417 110 77

what's that , it looks american 

 L. Raymond
oh , one of those , i hate that

 what's that , it looks american 
It's funny that it's posted to an Italian group and a Polish group then.
-- 
 -slunky

 wrote in message
news:slrnfildnj...@evo.zero...

y'all look a same ta us canooks

 near free fall speed.
So one is left to wonder, if we grant that the towers behaved in the fashion 
of a controlled demolition, why they were deliberately made to look like a 
controlled demolition. Where the people trying so hard to make it look like 
planes knocked the towers down just being STUPID?
It's like the moon landing deniers. They insist there should be stars 
visible in the background of scenes exposed for raw sunlight. If stars 
should have been visible, wouldn't it be incredibly stupid to just FORGET to 
include them? All the scientific genius that went into the supposed fake 
moon landing, and they forget to include the stars? I can only imagine that 
the deniers think that when they mentioned it, the scientists involved in 
the cover-up smacked their foreheads and said "Shit! We forgot the stars!" 
Yeah, right.
-- 
Denis Loubet
dlo...@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
 

 wrote in message
news:kbednYM5oIpyJbfa...@io.com...


 dlou...@io.comhttp://
www.io.com/~dloubethttp://www.ashenempires.com

>> near free fall speed.
Of course it was a controlled demo job, very
skillfull.
I remember watching it happen.
Whether US GovCo knew or not ....


 wrapped around a nearby dome interior.
So rather than deal with the difficulty of achieveing such an effect with 
billions of dollars available, they left them out entirely? Wouldn't that be 
the bigger blunder?
Of course, it's moot since we know that stars wouldn't show up anyway at the 
exposures they were using.


towers.
The reduction is tensile strength of the support steel due to the hot fire is a
perfect explanation for the collapse top-down. 
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

 It's funny that it's posted to an Italian group and a Polish group then.
Not *that* funny, btw. We do speak english, both in Italy and Poland,
and we've been touched by that tragedy as well...so, i found the post
pretty interesting. At least, one tries a scientific approach to the
issue.
Cya
neurino

 perfect explanation for the collapse top-down.
Sorry dude, but shouldn't fire head upward due to combustion and, if
it's the case, flow downward with fuel?
I guess you're referring to the second scenario. But the steel
supports seem to melt far before any fire reach them.
But, if it's a matter of faith, then i surrender to the Pope.
neurino

 supports seem to melt far before any fire reach them.
No. They didn't melt.
They just got so hot that they could no longer support the load and
buckled
After 2 or 3 floors  there was such a load on the damaged surviving
floor that the whole lot gave way and began the fall seen on  the
videos of the collapse

 perfect explanation for the collapse top-down.
Yes.  But shoenfeld would rather believe that it was controlled
demolition and that it was sheer COINCIDENCE that the buildings just
happened to have been hit by aircraft shortly before their collapse.

But, if it's a matter of faith, then i surrender to the Pope.
The initial collapse happened exactly where the planes hit.  With the reduction
of tensile strength at the impact level, the higher stories collapsed as a unit
and downward on top of  lower floors not stressed for vertical impact load.




30 minutes before the collapse?  And at the exact floor level?


 dlou...@io.comhttp://
www.io.com/~dloubethttp://www.ashenempires.com
For such a Jewish group of silly naysayers, you folks certainly are
funny about excluding evidence and using those highly conditional laws
of physics.
Do all such lying Yids (aka pretend atheists) not go to hell?
BTW, Venus isn't a star.
- Brad Guth -

 and downward on top of  lower floors not stressed for vertical impact load.
This is straightforward. Nevertheless, it'd be clear that, until we'll
not have any comprehensive explanation of the crash we can't head
neither to one nor to the opposite direction.
The great amount of conspiracy theories emerges exactly bc the
political response, the way the collapses have been managed with
respects to media/scientints/public opinions is far from being clear
and cristalline.
Personally, i'm not that into this suspicious mind, but i truly
believe that some dark spots shall be made clear, as soon as possible,
before everything will be lost (last but not the least the awareness
of living in a exploited world as exploited people).
neurino

neurino
