Newsgroup: it.politica
Titolo: OBAMA il GRANDE e il BOOM ECONOMICO USA

Ricordate come i laidi BUSH lasciarono gli Stati Uniti? Sull'orlo del DEFAULT, con una mano davanti e una dietro!
 
Ora gli USA sono in pieno BOOM ECONOMICO grazie a una Presidenza quasi miracolosa. 
Fa bene il premio Nobel per l'Economia PAUL KRUGMAN, reputato genio da tutto il mondo, a dire che Obama e fra i 3 migliori Presidenti mai avuti dagli Stati Uniti!
 
E oggi Papa Francesco, ripetendo le parole di Gesù, ha confermato la visione di pace e di aiuto ai più poveri di Obama il Grande.
 
BELLISSISMO!
 
e
 
PS: Un pensierino a Putino, isolato dalle sanzioni, hitlerino del terzo millennio protettore dei criminali come Assad che ha messo nella merda il suo paese ma lui ha una montagna di miliardi di dollari nelle banche estere!

 Ora gli USA sono in pieno BOOM ECONOMICO grazie a una Presidenza quasi miracolosa
 
Molti dicono che le paghe stanno ferme e il numero di quelli che cercano 
lavoro è al minimo dagli anni settanta. In pratica quello che sta 
avvenendo è la smentita, almeno in queste condizioni, della teoria della 
marea che alza tutte le barche, piccole grandi e medie. Quasi tutto 
questo boom cioè sta andando a una ristrettissima elitè
 


All'inizio fu così, poi l'economia ha preso forza e ora le paghe sono in aumento (nonostante l'opposizione del Congresso dei capezzatori NaziRep) per via dei referendum fatti da molti Stati e il PIL vola a un + 4%, riportando gli Usa a essere la locomotiva economica del pianeta.
 
e
 


http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/in-defense-of-obama-20141008?page=2
 
 
In Defense of Obama: parla il genuio dell'economia PAUL KRUGMAN!!!!!!!!!!
===================================================================
The Nobel Prize-winning economist, once one of the president's most notable critics, on why Obama is a historic success
By Paul Krugman October 8, 2014
 
    Share
    Tweet
    Share
    Comment
    Email
 
President Obama signing the Affordable Care Act. In our new cover story, Paul Krugman explores the president's successes. Win McNamee/Getty
 
When it comes to Barack Obama, I've always been out of sync. Back in 2008, when many liberals were wildly enthusiastic about his candidacy and his press was strongly favorable, I was skeptical. I worried that he was naive, that his talk about transcending the political divide was a dangerous illusion given the unyielding extremism of the modern American right. Furthermore, it seemed clear to me that, far from being the transformational figure his supporters imagined, he was rather conventional-minded: Even before taking office, he showed signs of paying far too much attention to what some of us would later take to calling Very Serious People, people who regarded cutting budget deficits and a willingness to slash Social Security as the very essence of political virtue.
Sidebar
President Barack Obama
Hope and Change Index: 6 Years of Progress, By the Numbers >>
 
And I wasn't wrong. Obama was indeed naive: He faced scorched-earth Republican opposition from Day One, and it took him years to start dealing with that opposition realistically. Furthermore, he came perilously close to doing terrible things to the U.S. safety net in pursuit of a budget Grand Bargain; we were saved from significant cuts to Social Security and a rise in the Medicare age only by Republican greed, the GOP's unwillingness to make even token concessions.
 
But now the shoe is on the other foot: Obama faces trash talk left, right and center - literally - and doesn't deserve it. Despite bitter opposition, despite having come close to self-inflicted disaster, Obama has emerged as one of the most consequential and, yes, successful presidents in American history. His health reform is imperfect but still a huge step forward - and it's working better than anyone expected. Financial reform fell far short of what should have happened, but it's much more effective than you'd think. Economic management has been half-crippled by Republican obstruction, but has nonetheless been much better than in other advanced countries. And environmental policy is starting to look like it could be a major legacy.
 
I'll go through those achievements shortly. First, however, let's take a moment to talk about the current wave of Obama-bashing. All Obama-bashing can be divided into three types. One, a constant of his time in office, is the onslaught from the right, which has never stopped portraying him as an Islamic atheist Marxist Kenyan. Nothing has changed on that front, and nothing will.
president obama
Sean Gallup/Getty
 
There's a different story on the left, where you now find a significant number of critics decrying Obama as, to quote Cornel West, someone who ''posed as a progressive and turned out to be counterfeit.'' They're outraged that Wall Street hasn't been punished, that income inequality remains so high, that ''neoliberal'' economic policies are still in place. All of this seems to rest on the belief that if only Obama had put his eloquence behind a radical economic agenda, he could somehow have gotten that agenda past all the political barriers that have con- strained even his much more modest efforts. It's hard to take such claims seriously.
 
Finally, there's the constant belittling of Obama from mainstream pundits and talking heads. Turn on cable news (although I wouldn't advise it) and you'll hear endless talk about a rudderless, stalled administration, maybe even about a failed presidency. Such talk is often buttressed by polls showing that Obama does, indeed, have an approval rating that is very low by historical standards.
 
But this bashing is misguided even in its own terms - and in any case, it's focused on the wrong thing. 
 
Yes, Obama has a low approval rating compared with earlier presidents. But there are a number of reasons to believe that presidential approval doesn't mean the same thing that it used to: There is much more party-sorting (in which Republicans never, ever have a good word for a Democratic president, and vice versa), the public is negative on politicians in general, and so on. Obviously the midterm election hasn't happened yet, but in a year when Republicans have a huge structural advantage - Democrats are defending a disproportionate number of Senate seats in deep-red states - most analyses suggest that control of the Senate is in doubt, with Democrats doing considerably better than they were supposed to. This isn't what you'd expect to see if a failing president were dragging his party down.
 
More important, however, polls - or even elections - are not the measure of a president. High office shouldn't be about putting points on the electoral scoreboard, it should be about changing the country for the better. Has Obama done that? Do his achievements look likely to endure? The answer to both questions is yes.

 In Defense of Obama: parla il genuio dell'economia PAUL KRUGMAN!!!!!!!!!!
 
Però l'indice di approvazione di Obama Magno è sul 48% le paghe non si 
alzano e il numero di quelli che cercano lavoro è ai minimi dagli anni 
70. Cigliena sulla torta la favolosa notizia di due giorni fa che negli 
USA c'era un grande boom economico è già sparita da tutte le testate
 


Evidentemente alla maggioranza degli americani non frega niente dell'
opinione di Paul Krugman :)
 
 
--
I think, therefore I question.


vuoi SAPERNE PIù DEL GRANDE KRUGMAN, premio nobel per l'economia?

 vuoi SAPERNE PIù DEL GRANDE KRUGMAN, premio nobel per l'economia?
 
Stiamo messi male se sono questi gli argomenti e cmq si, ne so più di 
Krugman, contento?
 
 


Contentisismo per te: ti aggiungo alla lista.
 
e