Newsgroup: it.politica
Titolo: Et tu Russia: 'Fitzgerald: The Muslim population of Russia, and the future'

The Muslim population of Russia has gone up 40% since 1989. Meanwhile the
Russian population of Russia has gone down. There are now 25 million Muslims
in Russia. And the Central and East European Affairs editor of The Economist
has suggested in print that by 2015, 40% of the Russian army may be Muslim.
What do the Russians intend to do about this? Anything? Nothing?
And what do the Americans intend to do in their conversations with the
Russians? Will they not mention this? Will they not try to emphasize that
common ground should be found against a common threat -- that of the
worldwide Jihad? Will they not explain to the Russians that whatever the
Russian government does to deal with a potential Muslim threat will get no
quarrel from us? And it should get no quarrel from us, because we are, or
should be, much more fearful of a Russian military under Muslim control --
by 2040, 2050? -- than of one under the control of the Russians themselves.
After all, the Russians are rational actors, though they are far too given
to conspiracy theories about the West and especially about America (which
has hardly been paying the kind of attention to "encircling Russia" that
many Russians apparently are convinced it has).
A poster at Jihad Watch recently asserted that "Russia and the majority of
Middle Eastern powers are natural allies." And certainly many people believe
this to be the case. But in fact, Russia and the majority of Middle Eastern
powers are not natural allies, even if shortsighted Russian leaders may
think they are. Any country that relies on oil for its main source of wealth
has a stake in the disruption of oil supplies elsewhere. Russia should not
wish Iran or Saudi Arabia well. This is principally because they are its
economic competitors, supplying the same goods it supplies: oil and natural
gas in the case of Iran, oil in the case of Saudi Arabia.
Furthermore, the Russians should be worried far more than they seem to be
about demographic changes, and about the possibility of Muslims taking over
parts of the military in a decade or two or three. They appear as heedless
of this problem as the American government has appeared heedless of the
texts and tenets of Islam. The American government remains convinced that
the "best way" to deal with the situation is to pour money and men and
materiel into Iraq or, for some (choose your poison), into Afghanistan, when
the desired results will never come. They will never come, but this will be
to the everlasting surprise of the American government, because the nature
of Islam, and the threat of Islam, has not been understood.
Many Russians are consumed with conspiracy theories about America. And these
conspiracy theories gain credibility from the maladroit American
presentation of those policies, and American officials' seeming inability to
explain them in a way that Russians would find palatable. They do not even
seem capable of explaining, or perhaps of understanding themselves, that
Russia and America share the same potential threats and need to collaborate,
rather than cling to or reassert hostile attitudes. Russians, meanwhile,
seem to assume that Muslims in Russia will continue to be
"Muslims-for-identification-purposes-only" Muslims just like those their
parents grew up with. They somehow think that "our" (nashi) Muslims are
"different." The same complacent thought is often uttered these days by
Americans: the Muslims in America are "quite different" -- better educated,
more prosperous -- we are constantly told, and therefore "not a threat," as
are the Muslims in Western Europe. Whistling in the dark.
The Russians are not factoring in the renewed appeal of Islam for some
Muslims in Russia, especially in the Caucasus but also in Moscow itself, and
the effect of Saudi-financed mosques and propaganda all over the place. The
effects of the long-ago anti-religious campaign in the Soviet Union, and the
crushing of the revolt by Central Asian Muslims who were opposed to this
policy in the 1930s, are held by some Russians even today to represent a
permanent end to the internal Muslim threat. They are wrong. And they are
betting a lot, far too much, on that notion.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/022251.php#more
-- 
Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism ideology
enforced upon the white world against the will of its peoples, leading to
mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + pol-corr = lethal mixture
for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle all
surveillance technology.

 has suggested in print that by 2015, 40% of the Russian army may be Muslim.
And then?
You would want to exterminate them  ?
-- 
Nessuno si apetta l’Inquisizione spagnola.

 The Muslim population of Russia has gone up 40% since 1989.  .......
And  another of the evils of the world is the anglosaxon superbia.



Le tue domande sembrano tanto poco intelligenti che non invitano a 
risponderti.


 risponderti.
Ma tu sei tanto stupido da farlo   :-P
Venendo alla questione: allora cosa vorresti fare sterminare tutti gli 
islamici ?
Gli USA soffiano sul pericolo islamico per attaccare chi è una minaccia 
per il proprio dominio del mondo.
