Newsgroup: it.politica
Titolo: Due coglioni di Trump presi a pesci in faccia dal giudice federale (repubblicano) della Pa.

Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit
 
  (CNN)A federal judge dealt a death blow to the Trump campaign's effort 
to overturn President-elect Joe Biden's win of the presidency on 
Saturday, by dismissing a closely watched lawsuit that sought to
invalidate millions of Pennsylvania votes.
 
"IT IS NOT IN THE POWER OF THIS COURT TO VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION" Judge 
Matthew Brann of the US District Court in the Middle District of 
Pennsylvania wrote on Saturday in a withering decision, hours after the 
final round of filings in the case came in. The judge wholeheartedly 
rejected the Trump campaign's attempt to throw out the Pennsylvania 
vote, noting that Biden has won the state and results will be certified 
by state officials on Monday. Biden has a margin of more than 81,000 
votes in the state.
 
"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the 
disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its 
sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand 
more," the judge wrote. "At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their 
burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."
 
Though the case was always extremely unlikely to succeed, President 
Donald Trump's backers and legal team -- and particularly his personal 
attorney Rudy Giuliani -- had pinned their hopes on the federal judge in 
Pennsylvania giving some credibility to their suspicions of fraud and 
entertaining Trump's attempt to overturn the popular vote for Biden.
But Brann, a longtime and well-known Republican in Pennsylvania, refused.
Shortly after the decision came down, Republican Sen. Pat Toomey of 
Pennsylvania congratulated Biden as the President-elect, breaking from 
party leaders and a vast majority of congressional Republicans who 
continue to back Trump's efforts to challenge the results.
 
The two voters in the lawsuit said that in their counties, they were not 
allowed to "cure" their ballots, and thus had their ballots rejected, 
while other counties, like heavily Democratic Philadelphia County, 
allowed voters to "cure" absentee ballots. That discrepancy, they 
claimed, meant that Pennsylvania's election results in their entirety 
should be blocked by court order, which theoretically, could deprive 
Biden of the state's 20 Electoral College votes.
 
Brann called the legal reasoning behind the Trump campaign's Equal 
Protection claim "Frankenstein's Monster."
"The answer to invalidated ballots is not to invalidate millions more," 
Brann wrote.
Brann also admonished the Trump campaign for presenting no factual proof 
of voter fraud or other allegations -- evidence that Giuliani and 
Trump's supporters have repeatedly said is in the works but has never 
materialized. Elections officials in multiple states as well as judges 
have said there was no widespread fraud in the 2020 election.
 
"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a 
plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments 
and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have 
no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief 
despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That 
has not happened," Brann added. "Instead, this Court has been presented 
with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, 
unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."
 
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/21/politics/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-pennsylvania-lawsuit/index.html
 
 
bogie
-- 
Membro del Luigino fans club
 
"Chi non ha nemmeno una cultura, come può tollerarne due o tre diverse?"
 
-- 
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
 
 


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
When we called the scavengers scavengers and not ecological operators, Trump's lawyers would have been  OLD SHITS, today let's call them more elegantly COPROLITES.