Newsgroup: it.politica
Titolo: ¡UNIOS! Info #79en/es: 6/11 Lucha en el CIE, 1994 -

Louis Godena
It's the manner of doing things, for Chris' sake, comrade Louis!
See also a declaration which I just posted.
*You* signed a statement last spring, and so did *I*.
*Now*, a communique appears, one of August '96, in which some of 
those organizations appear as signatories which likewise endor-
sed that statement, but your name, for instance, is *not* on it,
nor is mine. I suppose you haven't been asked beforehand about 
whether you wanted to sign it either? I at any rate was not.
Then what *is* this? Are not we two (and Charlotte Kates, who 
also endorsed the Call for a WMC as an individual) in practice 
made into "unpersons" here? Why were we not asked?
It's *not* unimportant to inform the public *correctly* on *who* 
are the endorsers of the Call for the WMC!
This is not done here, is it?
True enough, that committee which I understand you belong to ap-
pears as a signatory. Has it really held a meeting to endorse
an *August 1996* statement? NB it's *not* exactly the same
statement as the Call either, but something mysteriously called
a "Communique No 1".
The IEC group I'm in, the group here in Malmoe, figures as a 
signatory. It certainly has *not* been asked to sign.
If you personally don't mind being made into an unperson, I cer-
tainly do. And I do mind people pretending certain organizations
have signed things, when in fact they have not. Even if, as in 
this case, I would wish that this was the case.
Doesn't the suspicion arise here that "IEC - Malmoe - Sweden" is
being used as a "substitute" for my name. But I and that group 
are bloody well not the same thing, dammit!
And this here thing is being done by comrades in which until now 
I had trust. Do you think that, because of that, we should swal-
low it, or what? *De ninguna maniera*, on my part at least.
In my case, at least - I don't know about you, but I hold the 
same principle must apply to you too - I occupy a certain posi-
tion in international political life, since some time back too.
 
True, I am only an individual, a microbe if you want, but the 
thing is, I've consistently represented and advocated a certain 
political line, namely, that of Marx, Lenin and Mao Zedong, for 
a couple of decades within Sweden, for a couple of years visibly
internationally too. I don't accept things being described as if
I were not, as an individual, one of the endorsers of the WMC.
And this is not the only thing that's completely impermissible 
about this "comminique".
It hints, not least, at there already existing a WMC, doesn't 
it? Though this is not clear either. So we have confusion. And 
if there already were a WMC - would you accept its formation 
without us co-endorsers being as much as consulted in the least
way beforehand? I think you shouldn't.
Do you really not see that things must *not* be allowed to be 
presented in such a manner?
I'll certainly *not* "calm down" on this, you can rely on that!
"600 posts on this between now and All Saints Day"? You said it
Louis, I do think the comrades need to get 6000, so perhaps 
they'll understand how *not* to do things!
I hope the other WMC endorsers who likewise are on the Swoons
Collection Marxism list see this too.
Rolf M.
[Continued in part 7/11]




[Continued from part 5/11]













More on this later!
Rolf M.











Rolf M.





"WORLD MOBILISATION COMMISSION (WMC)
COMMUNIQUE No. 1",
dated "Brussels, August 1996"

I hereby declare that 
























Louis G.,
You wrote:












And this here thing is being done by comrades in whom until now 
