Newsgroup: it.fan.tv.buffy
Titolo: Buffy the vampire slayers: il reboot

Permettetemi un tarantinismo: butt' de sang! :-(
http://www.mymovies.it/cinemanews/2009/8759/
Il nuovo film di Buffy non sarï¿½ collegato alla serie televisiva, nï¿½ userï¿½ i
popolari personaggi secondari come Angel, Willow, Xander o Spike. La
Vertigo e Kazui vogliono riavviare la storia senza calpestare l'universo
creato da Whedon, creando qualcosa di simile al reboot di Star Trek.
http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/05/new-buffy-movie.html?xid=rss-feed-todayslatest-%27Buffy%27+without+Joss+Whedon%3F+NO
!
A Joss Whedon-less 'Buffy' movie: Worst idea ever of the year
According to the Hollywood Reporter, the rights holders of Buffy the
Vampire Slayer -- which began as the 1992 crapmound film starring Kristy
Swanson and was later transformed by writer Joss Whedon into one of the
touchstone TV series of the last 25 years -- are planning a
remake/relaunch. Now, fans of the Buffyverse have been clamoring for a
feature extension ever since the show's end in 2003; and they've made the
Whedon-overseen comic books best sellers. Whedon has long been the hand on
the wheel of the Buffy franchise, and his cultish fanbase are legion.
That raucous sound you hear is that fanbase currently consulting an
engineer to figure out exactly how to support all of the hell they're gonna
raise. Because -- get this -- Whedon isn't involved. AT ALL.
According to the news item, the producers aren't against the idea of
Whedon's involvement, but they haven't "reached out to him." What's more,
this new "film" would have no connection with the TV series, nor would it
feature any of the show's robust supporting cast. In other words, they'd be
jettisoning everything and everyone that made Buffy work. I swear,
sometimes it's as if Hollywood sets out with "failure" plugged right into
the GPS.
The only reason that Buffy remains a viable franchise is because of the
rabid, happy-to-purchase fanbase. And the only reason that fanbase exists
is because of Joss Whedon. (There are actually t-shirts out there with
"Joss Whedon is my master now" printed on them.) Why leave all that money
on the table simply to make a shoddy Twilight-lite? Because there's no way
those fans would turn out if Whedon wasn't involved -- what's more, they'd
actively work to undermine it in every way possible.
Clearly, Joss has more Buffy stories to tell. Why not let him? Would you go
see this film without Joss Whedon at the helm? Vote in our poll. Sound off
in the comments section.
-- 
Jolan Tru
Filippo "Hytok" Simone
http://perestroika.iobloggo.com/

 Permettetemi un tarantinismo: butt' de sang! :-(
Se così fosse .... :-(
Nooooooooooooooo
Ciao
valentina

 Permettetemi un tarantinismo: butt' de sang! :-(
ma Buffy almeno ci sar�?
Altrimenti fanno prima a chiamarlo
Peppiniella the Vampire Slayer
e si tolgono ogni problema...
o vogliono sfruttare solo il logo?
Buffy ha il fandom pi� accanito, non credo che perdonerebbero una cosa del
genere.
-- 
Costruisci il tuo villaggio, crea la tua alleanza
e combatti contro altri villaggi:
Travian - 
http://www.travian.it/?uc=it4_4434

A Joss Whedon-less 'Buffy' movie: Worst idea ever of the year
questo e' quello che penso anche io -_-
-- 
Fabio Cavallin
a.k.a. Dottor Divago
«[...]And then the day come when cylons decided to kill their masters»

 del genere.
Non e' quello piu' accanito:)  Non conosci la fanbase del Dottore :D

 o vogliono sfruttare solo il logo?
Il logo sicuramente no, perché non è loro, è della Fox ^^;
Mentre il nome "Buffy", apparentemente no...
--
Laz

 Mentre il nome "Buffy", apparentemente no...
Intendevo il marchio "Buffy", come nome :)
mi sono espresso male


 Intendevo il marchio "Buffy", come nome :)
"brand", "franchise" :-D
Daniele