Newsgroup: it.politica
Titolo: World War Two was not a war between Germany and the Allies

Hitler had been doing phenomenally well in turning his country around
economically ever since he came to power.  He did this by breaking
with the Jewish international bankers, and trading by barter, thus
bartering the surplus of goods Germany had, with the surplus of goods
Germany needed that another country had, without debts being incurred
on either side.
He, like Abraham Lincoln before him, simply issued what money was
needed on the authority of the German Government, which was backed by
the productivity of the German labour force, and not the empty
promises of Jewish international bankers, who in a country without
debt, could not function.
As a result of this policy, Germany was able to regenerate the social
and spiritual life of all its citizens.
As a result of a Germany being run for the benefit of the Germans as
oppose to for the benefit of Jewish bankers, the citizens of Germany
were able to make Germany the most powerful and prosperous state in
Europe in only a seven year period.
The Jews could not let this continue as they knew that it would spell
the death of their debt driven money system and so World War 2 starts
this year, in earnest.  This war is about one thing, which money
system would survive.  This is not a war between Germany and the
Allies, it is a war between Germany and the Jewish money power who are
in control of the Allied leadership and use them and their media to
propagandize the Allied populous into hatred of the Germans.
Following the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, there are now only
five nations on the world left without a Rothschild owned central
bank: Iran; North Korea; Sudan; Cuba; and Libya. Interestingly the
satellite state of Israel, more commonly known as the United States
government chooses to refer to these countries as, "rogue nations."
One of the fundamental causes of this war has been the unrelaxing
efforts of Germany since 1918 to secure wide enough foreign markets to
straighten her finances at the very time when all her competitors were
forced by their own debts to adopt exactly the same course. Continuous
friction was inevitable. Germany adopted a new monetary policy ...
after which Germany ceased to experience any financial difficulty.
In England the people suffer the burdens of heavy and increasing
taxation, but in Germany, the Times reports:
"Nothing is ever heard of the necessity of increasing tax- ation,
compulsory savings, or the issue of enormous public war loans. Quite
the contrary. Recently an important tax was abolished. Public savings
bank deposits touch new monthly records again and again. Money is so
plentiful that the interest rate on Reich loans could recently be
reduced from 4-1/2 to 4 per cent.
These changes may well call for drastic readjustments in our
established conventions. A hidebound persistence in methods and
doctrines which were sound fifty years ago may easily prove as costly
in the financial and ecomomic field as actual war. It might not lose
the war; it would certainly lose the peace."
(London Times, October 11 and 12 and November 13, 1940).
Germany was trying to break the credit ring of the money monopolists
by the force of economic sanity and that was un- forgivable. She was
acting like a worker who went on strike against system which deprived
him of adequate food supplies though he as quite willing to exchange
his labor to pay for them.
"In 1937 Hitler wrote:
'Germany will enter into no obligations to pay for her im- ports than
she is capable of fulfilling. The German Government thus takes the
standpoint of the respectable merchant who keeps his orders in harmony
with his power to pay. We laugh at the time when our national
economists held the view that the value of a currency is regulated by
the gold and securities lying in the vaults of a State Bank; and more
especially we laugh at the theory that its value was guaranteed
thereby. We have instead come to learn that the value of a currency
lies in the productive capacity of a nation. '
The world financial monopoly stood aghast. If Germany succeeded in her
plan of economic penetration, other nations might follow per example.
The whole world would then exchange goods for goods in a basis of
equality and good fellowship. No one would want to borrow and the
financial pyramid of debt, from the apex of which Almighty Finance
ruled the world, would collapse. Humanity would be well fed, but the
financiers would lose their power.
If the German monetary experiment had been allowed to develop on the
basis of a friendly exchange of goods it would have provided the world
with useful information to assist it in solving its commercial
problems.
What was a laudable effort on the part of Germany has become a world
war -- a war of ideas in which Hitler strives to form a European
economic monopoly opposed to the financial monopolies of the world.
Statesmen began to prepare the public mind for war. No mention was
made of the real causes of the crisis -- the bitter scramble for world
markets, the trickery and inhuman methods used to obtain spheres of
influence for surplus investments and for increasing the burden of
world debt. Statesmen again were preparing to sacrifice the youth of
their country on the bloody alter of Mammon.
"As in peace, so in war. Humanity must be sacrificed to save a
worthless economic system."
"Once again the peoples were told that if they destroyed the leader of
the German nation all would be well with the world. Germany worshipped
its leader. Britain trusted its Government. Both peoples believed
their leaders would save the world. It was a tragedy of faith in men.
One nation has to fight for a new economic and political system the
other to preserve the old ones.
Source: AMERICAN MANIFEST DESTINY AND THE HOLOCAUSTS, BY CONRAD GRIEB
(Liberty Bell, 1978), pp 233-236
It is a dangerous game to place people above profits. Like Abe Lincoln
and President John F. Kennedy, not long after he defied the interests
of international finance Adolf Hitler was dead.
The death of Twenty to Fifty Million gentiles is nothing to the jewish
criminal bankers when it comes to protecting their rackets.
Russia proves you can beat the banker. Since the fall of jewish
international banking in Russia in 1991 (700,000 Jews left Russia for
Israel after the collapse of communist rule), bartering has made up up
to 80% of the economy in some places. You can imagine how Russia has
slipped off the Christmas card list of the western countries still in
the grip of the Jewish international bankers!
The Synagogue of Satan The Secret History of Jewish World Domination:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Andrew.Carrington.Hitchcock/Synagogue.of.Satan/1936-1948.htm

 
http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Andrew.Carrington.Hitchcock/Synagogue.of.Satan/1936-1948.htm
scusi lei, come si chiama?
Synagogue of satan?
Sappi allora, che per noi creazionisti, i soldi valgono da tutto il 
malloppo, fino all'ultimo centesimo di millesimo
http://my.telegraph.co.uk/rimuda/

 The Synagogue of Satan The Secret History of Jewish World Domination:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Andrew.Carrington.Hitchcock/Synago.
..
I guess you didn't majored in either Economics or in History, did you?