Newsgroup: it.politica
Titolo: Non nasciamo "tabula rasa": leggere IL GENE AGILE per sapere a che punto è la ricerca in questo campo


--------------------------------
Inviato via 
http://arianna.libero.it/usenet/

 ernesto


www.amazon.co.uk/God-Delusion-Richard-Dawkins/dp/0593055489
Who wrote Richard Dawkins's new book?
This past Tuesday, Richard Dawkins spoke at DC's famous Politics &
Prose bookstore, reading from his new book "The God Delusion." One
philosophically astute questioner, American Enterprise Institute's Joe
Manzari, had the following exchange with Dr. Dawkins:
    Manzari: Dr. Dawkins thank you for your comments. The thing I have
appreciated most about your comments is your consistency in the things
I've seen you've written. One of the areas that I wanted to ask you
about, and the place where I think there is an inconsistency, and I
hoped you would clarify, is that in what I've read you seem to take a
position of a strong determinist who says that what we see around us
is the product of physical laws playing themselves out; but on the
other hand it would seem that you would do things like taking credit
for writing this book and things like that. But it would seem, and
this isn't to be funny, that the consistent position would be that
necessarily the authoring of this book, from the initial conditions of
the big bang, it was set that this would be the product of what we see
today. I would take it that that would be the consistent position but
I wanted to know what you thought about that.
    Dawkins: The philosophical question of determinism is a very
difficult question. It's not one I discuss in this book, indeed in any
other book that I've ever talked about. Now an extreme determinist, as
the questioner says, might say that everything we do, everything we
think, everything that we write has been determined from the beginning
of time in which case the very idea of taking credit for anything
doesn't seem to make any sense. Now I don't actually know what I
actually think about that...
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2006/10/who_wrote_richard_dawkinss_new.html
Luciano
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
 The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 ha scritto:

Ah, Lucià ma non capisci manco l'inglese?
Il determinismo oggi in Fisica è una STRONZATA, visto che è straprovato
l'INDETERMINISMO di YHeisenberg! ma tu sai di Ohe parlo? Ne dubito assai! In
ogni modo sappi che l'universo nelle sue particelle fodnmentali è talmente
indeterminato che se pure esistesse un dio non potrebbe sapere nulla sul
futuro dle mondo.
Infatti se Einstein fosse ancora vivo dovrebbe ricredersi: non solo "dio"
gioca a dadi, ma bara continuamente..." (anche se la meccanica Quantistica
ha leggi ben precise e ben dimostrate, ma chi ci si avvicina avverte un
senso di vcertigine....
MA TU NON SAI DI CHE PARLO.
In ogni modo ci sono molti libri da leggere, molto belli, sull'evoluzione
"IL RACCONTO DELL'ANTENATO "(The Ancestor's Tale" ) sempre di Dawkins e un
fantastico "IL PROGRAMMA DELL'UNIVERSO ("Programmin the Univers. A Quantum
Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos) di Seth Lloyd.
Temo che la tua preparazione in merito sia troppo carente pe queste letture
per quanto semplici.
In ogni modo vale per gli altri che eventualmente ci leggessero.
Ernesto.


 Ein Dorf in der Sonne


MA TU NON SAI DI CHE PARLO.
Il punto e' imbecille, che non lo sai nemmeno tu.
