Newsgroup: it.comp.giochi.sportivi.hattrick
Titolo: Secondo me molto interessante...

ATTACK: THE NEW MIDFIELD???
With this being the season that sees the new sets of tactics fully 
implemented, there are many variations on tactics, which sees numerous 
complaints from many people, numerous shock results, including some very 
extreme cases, but is it now the beginning of the end for the playmaking 
trainers? Here is my own personal view, from what I have noticed from 
results in my own league.
I play in a strong level IV division in England. My team has a strong 
defence, one of, if not the strongest midfield, yet a poor attack. Until 
last Sunday I found myself sitting in 7th place, and 5th after a good 
win, following the purchases of two good attacking wingers.
There have been results on a couple of occasions, that I was absolutely 
disgusted with. Games where I held at least two or three levels of 
midfield (Magnificent vs Formidable, Outstanding vs Solid), yet I was to 
lose by a small margin, 2-1 and 2-0. In these games, I was to, 
obviously, hold the majority of possession, and create the majority of 
chances, yet would be totally unable to find the back of the net. In 
previous seasons, I would have been almost certain to have won these 
games by at least a couple of goals, yet now, I find myself lingering 
towards the bottom of my series, despite being thought of as one of the 
stronger sides.
The reason? Entirely attack. Whilst a lot of people have been switching 
to defence training (which, in England, is now practically as popular as 
playmaking training), I do not see this as the way to go. Even the 
strongest of defences are struggling without a well-rounded side, for 
example, take a look at Kung Fuu in the English Division III.10, who 
have an okay midfield, a dire attack, but a divine central defence. They 
find themselves last in their division. Whilst I, like many others train 
playmaking, I refuse to throw away my long term training plan, as I 
believe in the long run, my dominant midfield will help considerably, 
but I am looking to change to wing training in the future to give myself 
a dominant side attack. I'm looking at wing training as I believe it is 
possibly the best way to advance your side, should you have a dominant 
midfield, as it is very quick, and you can still train 4 wingers a week, 
at pace, and another 4 wing backs to add to your side attack ratings. 
Whilst scoring training is productive, it is also relatively slow, and 
you are only able to train a maximum of 6 players per week.
My point? Why are there so many defence trainers, when defence does not 
appear to be overly dominant? Is counter-attacking really a viable 
tactic? It may well be the most profitable training plan currently, but 
I do not believe that it is worthwhile as a means to advance your side. 
I see wing and scoring training as the way forward, as an overly strong 
midfield is no longer guaranteeing results. I would expect to see a 
sharp increase in scoring and wing trainees in the not too distant 
future, as team strive to improve their attacks in their on-going quest 
for goals and results.
-- 
Convolvulaceo, actually on: ICCP - ICGA - FISD - FISE - FIB - ICGSH
Console possedute: PS2 e fra poco Gamecube :-P
[HT] *F.C. Catania 2003* V.5 (#Id: 239389)
http://www.ht-arena.com/F.C.Catania2003/
ICQ: 338305510     C6: Convolvulaceo, 19NiceGuy85
Mailto: 
Il_Mio_Nick_...@tin.it

 ...............
Mi raccomando.... Niente babelfish!!!!!
Gio
--
Betis Giovanni f.c. (50984)
Italia , 1° in V.129

convolvulaceo(
Il_Mio_Nick_...@tin.it
), Dio m'ha detto che sei un fesso.
Hai da obiettare?
Ma ti sei cambiato il nick su hattrick :)
Pero' per molti sara' dura decifrare cuneoveraceo....
-- 
     Nicola *Nikok* Fornasier - From Quartu S.E. (CA) - #ICQ *60047807*
             Now in AFIAD - ICCP - ISCE - ICGSH - ISC - ICD
   [HT] *Nikok Team*, IV.13 (#Id 50897) - Membro IHNF - #015 Club Mille
       Founder di #afiad e #nikok @ in #warezzomani, #kaiba, #iccp
 
http://www.ht-arena.com/nikokteam
           --->-->-> Attenzione, sono un *troll* <-<--<---

Mi trova molto d'accordo. L'attacco (ma insieme al centrocampo) fa la
differenza. Prendiamo il caso in cui si gioca contro una squadra che fa il
contropiede. Se noi abbiamo un attacco non in forma e/o debole, sono
dolori, si rischia grosso anche se si ha un centrocampo di valore. Io ho
un allenatore difensivista, il giorno in cui mi calera' di livello
prendero' un offensivista. E sul mercato e' in genere piu' facile trovare
bravi difensori che bravi attaccanti a prezzi accettabili. 
Ciao
Plissken
Electra Roma FC, IV.20
-- 
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 ha scritto nel messaggio
news:bs557p$358$1...@news.newsland.it...
