Newsgroup: it.cultura.linguistica.inglese
Titolo: Uso dell'ausiliari do e did

Chi mi spiega in quali frasi interrogative non si usa l'ausiliare?
 
Giovanni
 

 Chi mi spiega in quali frasi interrogative non si usa l'ausiliare?
 
Tali ausiliari non si usano
- se c'è già un altro ausiliare:
     Could you please move out of my way?
     Have you got any children?
     What are you looking at?
     Shouldn't you be working at your new project?
     Had you ever gone to space before?
- se il termine 'Wh' è soggetto della frase:
     Who stole my car?
     Which one of you saved me?
     What caused all this commotion?
(I hope my sentences are correct.)
 
Kiuhnm

 ha scritto:

Grazie mille
 
Giovanni
 

 ha scritto nel messaggio 
news:4f8746b2$0$1384$4faf...@reader1.news.tin.it...

Aggiungerei solo che non si usano con "to be" anche quando non è impiegato 
come ausiliare ma come verbo a sé stante, .
Is it not? :)
 
 
 

 (I hope my sentences are correct.)
 
What do you know! [sic] I learned something. Oh oh. Maybe not.
 
Be careful of sentences like that, where the subject (you) isn't so obvious, 
and the use of 'do' is normal.
 
-- 
Joey from New York
Among those whom I like or admire, I can find no common denominator,
but among those whom I love, I can: all of them make me laugh.
   -- WH Auden
 

 What do you know! [sic] I learned something. Oh oh. Maybe not.
 
That's not a question and, besides, "what" is not a subject!
 
Kiuhnm

):

Yes, that's exactly what I was pointing out, simply as a caveat not to 
mistake that situation.


 Is it not? :)
 
 
Anche "to have"?
 
 
-- 
"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell
people what they do not want to hear."
                -- George Orwell
 

 Anche "to have"?
 
Mi pare di no.
Riesco soltanto a pensare a "Do you have...?", "Have you got...?" e 
"Have you?", ma in quest'ultimo caso mi pare che "have" sia ancora 
ausiliare del verbo principale che però è sottinteso.
 
Kiuhnm

 Anche "to have"?
 
No, it is used with the verb "to have."
 
Do you have any money? -- Yes, I do. (or Yes I have.)
Do you have any money to lend me? -- No, I don't. (or No, I really don't have 
any money to lend you.


No, it is used with the verb "to have."
 
Do you have any money? -- Yes, I do. (or Yes I have.)
Do you have any money to lend me? -- No, I don't. (or No, I really don't 
have
any money to lend you.
 
Ma si dice "Have you got any brothers or sisters?", no?
 
Per quel che so, va fatta una distinzione tra have nel senso di possesso, e 
have nelle espressioni tipo have breakfast, lunch, a shower ecc. che 
vogliono l'ausiliare "do" nelle domande. Ma forse nell'inglese contemporaneo 
questa distinzione tende a perdersi.
Giuseppe 
 

 Ma si dice "Have you got any brothers or sisters?", no?
 
Il verbo principale è "get".
 
Kiuhnm

 ausiliare del verbo principale che però è sottinteso.
 
Have you any idea how angry this makes your father?
 
 

 Ma si dice "Have you got any brothers or sisters?", no?
 
Just as common, IMO, is "Do you have any brothers or sisters."
 
I don't understand what you mean by the distinction between "have" in the 
sense of possession and in the sense of "have breakfast," etc.


> I don't understand what you mean by the distinction between "have" in the
sense of possession and in the sense of "have breakfast," etc.
 
Intendevo questo:
I have got a pen. Have you got a pen?
I have breakfast at 7. Do you have breakfast at 7?
 
Comunque vedo che ormai sono intercambiabili:
I have a house in the country.
I have got a house in the country.
I don’t have any brothers or sisters.
I haven’t got any brothers or sisters.
Do you have a cold?
Have you got a cold?
 
http://www.proz.com/forum/italian/19177-have_you_got_o_do_you_have.html