Newsgroup: it.cultura.linguistica.inglese
Titolo: Blanck?

Salve a tutti.
Su una bottiglia di colorante per capelli che usa mia nonna ho trovato
scritto:
"lustruous blanck".
Dalle scritte nelle altre lingue ("zwart", "noir", "nero") ho capito che
quel misterioso "blanck", che non ho trovato su nessun dizionario, dovrebbe
stare per "black".
Il colorante è di fabbricazione irlandese (Dublino): "blanck" è quindi una
forma dialettale irlandese?
Ciao,
Paolo

 forma dialettale irlandese?
Mi sembra che sia uno sbaglio tipografico.
Ciao,
Ron
USA

No, no, Lucio, this is another mistake. Do I have to give you another basic
lesson in creative writing? You have already beat the "fool" theme to death
under the name Ow Ouch. When you try to create a different character like Ondra,
you have to not only change the style of writing but also the mindset.
Otherwise, with so many similar patterns between Ow Ouch and Ondra, people will
begin to suspect that the same person is writing under both names.
----------------------------------------------
Ron....I've wasted enough time on ya !!!!
I'm aware you're Italian....
it's just to be wished that , all the guys
here got that by now !!!!
Only if there was some way I might prove that.
I just wanna point your stupid fake posts out
and dredge your childish-italian errors up !!!!!
Emphasize em !!!!!
 
Ron wrote...
No , no lucio "this" is another
( THAT'S ) ignoramus....
you're talking about above mentioned "mistake o' mines"
Ron wrote....
Do I have to give you ....
Are you brain dead ???
Whatzits ????!!!!!
( Shall I give you ) .... or
( I gotta give you )
Ron wrote ..
( Under the name...)
What the hell are you talking about ??
You've been pretending to be Briton or Yankee ???!!!!
U.S.A. = ( by the name ) 
Ron wrote : 
You have already beat.....
Hey...numskull !!!!
Guess what ?? 
Beat the theme DOESN'T MAKE SENSE AT ALL !!!!!!
It's not slang either !!!!!!!!
You should have written ( BEAT THE TOPIC TO DEATH )
and if you was Yankee you would've written : 
YOU HAVE ALREADY BEATEN
Already ...doesn't mean always surely ( GIA ) ...
As well as IN FACT doesn't mean ( INFATTI ) at all
Speaking of wich....
You wrote :
What is the deal with you ? 
In fact you english is atrocious..
Uh...Uh...
As eager as you're to hoax everyone...with your 
stunts , you can't overlook the fact that you're
Italian and you've gotta do away with your
literally Italia-mind attitude....
Well...it turns out that ... 
IN FACT = ANZI .....  not ( INFATTI )
Example....
I don't hate you . In fact , quite the opposite.
or......
He's not gonna be a problem. In fact , he will be
very helpful .
INFATTI = AS MATTER OF FACT
You sound hungry...
Ayuh , as matter of fact I didn't get even a nosh .
As for your stupid post...
You wrote..
You have already beat the theme...
Nope , nope , 
You should have written : 
You beat the theme before....
BEFORE = GIA ( as for concerns about that post )
....
As for the rest...
Your post is stupid..... NOT INCORRECT
I've once give you a reason to think I'm Ow ouch whatever.....????
You would stoop any to any low level
to have them have faith on your fairy tales....!!!!
Even retreating to your pointless feeling of
mistrust and distrust....
You're a jester...!!!!!!!!!
Get a life !!!
Don't you have nothing better to do with your time.
Aren't you suppose to have your nappy changed ??
YOU HAVE ALREADY BEAT THE THEME
doesn't make sense willy nilly !!!
You can't use already like that !!!!
GIA = ALREADY , BY NOW , BEFORE , YET
ALREADY...
You gotta usa already when something went on even before expected..
EXAMPLE ......
He had already gone !!!!
That means that you're surprised to find out that he was not home
when you arrived...because you expected she'd be still there.
AS MATTER OF FACT....it doesn't mean : 
THAT HE HASN'T BEEN STAYING HOME FORMERLY AND SEVERAL TIMES...
you'd use " HE HAD GONE BEFORE ( like this ) " otherwise..
QUESTA COME DIFERENZA
He had already gone = Lui e gia andato ( io pensavi che era ancora qui )
He had gone before ( like this ) = Lui e gia andato via ( in questa modo )
Altre volte ( o una soltanto ) lui gia era andato via prima che te..
THAT MEANS...
"already" doesn't mean at all :
SOMETHING THAT CAME ABOUT FORMERLY.
BY NOW...
You gotta use "BY NOW" when something should have come about before..
always be accostumed with ( SHOULD , WOULD , OUGHT TO , SUPPOSED TO + have )
EXAMPLE : 
 
He should have come back by now . 
LUI DOVEVA ( GIA ) ESERE TORNATO
YET = ( used only in questions ) 
Have you seen your sister yet ?
TU HAI ( GIA ) VISTO LA TUA SORELLA ?
BEFORE...
You gotta use BEFORE when something came about formerly or several times.
EXAMPLE
I'VE TOLD YOU BEFORE.
TI HO GIA DETTO...
or....
YOU HAVE BEAT THE THEME BEFORE.
That's why...
YOU CAN'T SAY : 
YOU HAVE ALREADY BEAT ....
If you was Yankee...you wouldn't've mistake this one.
SAYING : YOU HAVE ALREADY BEAT
is as good as SAYING that : 
you're surprised to find out that I beat the theme so soon..
because you expected me to make it LATER..
LIKE THIS..
YOU HAVE BEAT THE THEME BEFORE 
TU HAI GIA ( IN PRECEDENZA ) USATO IL TEMA..
YOU HAVE ALREADY BEAT THE THEME
HAI USATO COMPLETAMENTE IL TEMA DI GIA ( COSI PRESTO)
....PENSAVO CHE FACEVI QUESTO PIU TARDI
You can check that out in your dictionary eejit !!!
Now, you have no excuse !!!!! Own up !!!!
So to me , you're :
 either an ITALIAN JESTER or an ILLITERATE AMERICAN
Suit yourself !!!!
_____________________________________________________________
Help Yourself - Promote Your Site ---> 
http://www.MainE-Services.com
-- 
Posted from [151.21.182.166] by way of 
sitemail.everyone.net
 [216.200.145.35] 
via Mailgate.ORG Server - 
http://www.Mailgate.ORG