Newsgroup: it.cultura.linguistica.inglese
Titolo: breve espressione da tradurre...

vorrei una mano per tradurre questa espressione (il contesto è sempre
l'analisi di formule matamatiche):
-procedendo come nel caso precedente, otteniamo...
Grazie e ciao

 -procedendo come nel caso precedente, otteniamo...
Perche' non ci dici le tue proposte per tutte queste frasi che
ci chiedi di tradurre?
-- 
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - 
http://www.Mailgate.ORG

 ci chiedi di tradurre?
Soprattutto dato che, due righe per volta, la traduzione se la sta 
facendo fare (gratis) da altri.
sq

 facendo fare (gratis) da altri.
sei forse preoccupato che mi stia facendo fare una traduzione gratis?...ti
tranquillizzo, con queste due righe non mi scrivo (purtroppo) il testo,
servono solo come piccolo (ma importante) aiuto.

 -procedendo come nel caso precedente, otteniamo...
-developing as /in the previous case/above/, we find...
-- 
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 ci chiedi di tradurre?
Aren't they set phrases? You know them or you don't.
Bye, FB
-- 
L'importante è che risplenda tu, sola primadonna e immarcescibile leggenda
del tuo pianerottolo.
(Lucangel su it.cultura.libri)

 Aren't they set phrases? You know them or you don't.
No; the sort of language used by English mathematicians is different
from the language used by Italian ones.
I'm no great expert in maths, but for example I don't think we use
phrases like "si ha" or "otteniamo" in English.
Personally I'd omit them altogether, but I should be interested to hear
the opinion of somebody who knows more about maths than I do.
-- 
Mary

 the opinion of somebody who knows more about maths than I do.
Omitting them altogether might be a bit grim.
Subsituting formula 5.4 in the expression for g(k) we see
that Wifflington's condition is satisfied by the Gruntle
operator of the left adjunct of the Nargle transform of X.
Thus, 
(formula)
and we obtain k=5.


 the opinion of somebody who knows more about maths than I do.
"I should be interested" doesn't surprise me at all. I'm just wondering how
you'd write the following sentence a the first person pronoun (singular or
plural):
"I think you would be interested in his life, even though you shouldn't".
That is: "I think I should be interested in his life, even though I...
<modal verb>".
Thanks.
Bye, FB
-- 
"Nasalization is just a part of life"
(Joey DoWop Dee on it.cultura.linguistica.inglese)

 a the first person pronoun


I shouldn't
It's the same.


 <modal verb>".
You could say "I think I should be interested in his life, even though I
ought not to be".
-- 
Mary

 ought not to be".
Oh, as simple as that. Thank you.


 It's the same.
Are you sure you can write:
"I think I should be interested in his life, even though I shouldn't"?
Because I'm not sure you can or, rather, I'm pretty sure you cannot.
If you are an anglophone, jut ignore this.
Bye, FB
-- 
Io ho deciso di rifiutarmi di vederlo: Ettore con la faccia di Eric Banana
mi fa venire i conati.
(commento sul film "Troy" su it.fan.scrittori.tolkien)

 ought not to be".
Is it possible to adopt the solution Anna has suggested, with two "should"?
I think you can't, for the second "should" would be interpreted as the
first, not as "ought not".
Bye, FB
-- 
Mrs. Palmer, in her way, was equally angry. 'She was determined to drop his
acquaintance immediately, and she was very thankful that she had never been
acquainted with him at all'. (Jane Austen)

 Bye, FB
Despite its oxymoronic nature, I could see someone using the sentence with
two "should", maybe for ironic or comic effect, but only for that. In
AmEng, the use of "should" indicates only obligation, not intention, so
it's a contradictory statement, and could be confusing.
-- 
If you feel the need to e-mail me, un-not my address first.

 first, not as "ought not".
As Joey says, there's nothing grammatically wrong with it, but nobody
would use it because it's ambiguous.
-- 
Mary

"I think I should be interested in his life, even though I shouldn't"?
Well, I don't know about Anna, but I am sure you can.  At least I am sure you
can where I am.
bye
ari



Although you wouldn't write "I should be interested", would you?
