Newsgroup: it.fan.startrek
Titolo: The look of Archer's Enterprise

(alt.startrek)
"I'm tired of this "Archer's Enterprise looks like an Akira, and is
too
advanced looking to pre-date Kirk's Enterprise". The argument
doesn't
hold water. Besides, what do your nit-pickers expect? A ship that
looks
like it was designed in the 60's? Should comunicators look less
advanced
than Kirk's (with dials and blinking LED lights), when current cell
phones
have LCD displays, and look far more advanced? Backdating the look
of
Enterprise to a pre TOS look would be downright silly. It would look
as
fake as an episode of Captain Proton (or Flash Gordon)! The look of
Enterprise (Sets, models, uniforms, and props) looks more realistic
than anything even seen in Trek!
Given a chance, this show could be the best series yet. Too bad the
nitpickers can't get past the simple fact that another 24th century
show would be more boring than Voyager was, and that doing
a prequel is the freshest idea TPTB have come up with since DS-9.
The reality is, the only way Star Trek can survive, is to push the
reset button a little, and ignore past mistakes and errors to canon.
It's now 2001, Star Trek has been around for 35 years. There was no
Eugenics Wars in the 90's. There were no lauches of DY-100 class
ships in the late 1990s. So what? Just because Berman and Co. choose
to ignore certain DATED aspects of the previous series (I.E. TOS),
doesn't
take away anything for Trek as a whole. It just up-dates it a bit.
Nit-picking
about it won't change the fact that TOS is very dated, and
historically
inaccurate. The re-set button HAD TO BE HIT!"

 inaccurate. The re-set button HAD TO BE HIT!"
ctrl+alt+canc va bene lo stesso? ^_______^
ciao :)
--
Sat'Rain
e-mail: sat.rain()
genie.it

 ctrl+alt+canc va bene lo stesso? ^_______^
Oh no: ctrl+alt+DEL.   ;PPPP
--
Melora  aka Vedek Elalas (OLB)   :«))
"We often go off on wild tangents" (alt.startrek)

ships in the late 1990s. So what? Just because Berman and Co. choose
Non scelgono di ignorare! Dimenticano perche' non ci capiscono un cazzo! 
-- 
"Unix is user friendly, it's just selective 
about who its friends are."

 inaccurate. The re-set button HAD TO BE HIT!"
Ma chi č sto coglione? Nessuno gli ha detto che quando vedeva TOS non
stava guardando il TG ma un telefilm????
-- 
       Morgan Chane, Lupo dei Cieli
  "Tenutario" del sito ufficiale di IFST
 
http://digilander.iol.it/ifst
"Let your concepts flow unconstrained!" ŽZC

 stava guardando il TG ma un telefilm????
IMVHO non ha mai nemmeno *guardato* TOS, forse lo ha visto.
Resta il fatto che come detto piu' volte il mio cell ha l'aria piu'
moderna del comunicatore, per non parlare del computer da cui sto
scrivendo. Bah, te l'ho detto, fai finta che non c'entri niente con
ST e divertiti se riesci, io faro' cosi'.
^^____-


 like it was designed in the 60's?
[snip]
Ma chi e' che ha scritto 'ste fesserie?
L'Enterprise DEVE avere un design piu' "retro'" rispetto alle altre
astronavi. Pazienza se la tecnologia sembri piu' vecchia di quella
attuale, purche' il tutto abbia una consistenza all'interno del ciclo di
ST.
Rispetto agli anni '60 ci si puo' differenziare con effetti speciali
migliori e migliori riprese (l'Enterprise di Kirk che orbitava sembrava
davvero piu' un modellino che un'astronave. Oggi si puo' far di meglio).
Mulo